HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 3913 of 2010 DATED: 22.02.2010 Between: Himayethunnisa Begum .. Petitioner And 1. Govt. of A.P. rep. By District Collector 2. Govt. of A.P. rep. By its Tahsildar .. Respondents O R D E R:- The petitioner asserts that herself and the members of her family are the owners and possessors of the land admeasuring Ac.15.15 guntas in Sy.Nos.3 & 4 situated at Ghansimiyaguda village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, by virtue of the Allotment Order dated 01.02.2005 passed by this Court in Appl.No.690 of 2005 in C.S. No.14 of 1958 and as per the report of the Receiver-cum- Commissioner, who was appointed by this Court in C.S. No.14 of 1958. While so, the petitioner states that herself and the members of her family made an application requesting the 2nd respondent for mutation of their names in revenue records to the extent of the land allotted by the Receiver–cum-Commissioner, but the 2nd respondent, vide Memo dated 14.10.2009, rejected the claim of the petitioner on the ground that she has not submitted any valuable documents for grant of succession/mutation. Then, the petitioner made another representation, dated 25.01.2010 by enclosing all the certified copies of relevant documents for reconsideration of the earlier application, but no orders have been passed thereon. Now, it is the grievance of the petitioner that the 2nd respondent has neither passed any orders on his representation dated 25.01.2010 nor effected mutation in the revenue records, so far. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking appropriate directions. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents and perused the material placed on record. Inasmuch as the representation dated 25.01.2010 said to have been made by the petitioner is pending consideration before the 2nd respondent, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, is inclined to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: “The 2nd respondent-Tahsildar is directed to consider the representation dated 25.01.2010 said to have been made by the petitioner and the members of her family, and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, and communicate the same to the petitioner.” With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________ C.V. RAMULU, J 22nd February, 2010 bcj