IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 26246 of 2008 Between: 1 Islamiah Education Society, IslaMIAH complex, Monda Market, Secunderabad,rep.by its Vice President Zafar Javed 2 Zafar Javed S/o.Late Amjad Ali Khan R/o.Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Government of AP., School Education Department rep.by its principal SEcretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The District Collector-cum-Magistrate, Hyderabad District Hyderabad 3 The District Educational Officer, Hyderabad 4 The Revenue Divisonal Officer, Secunderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction one more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the orders of the 2nd respondent made in proceedings Rc.No.866/C5/2006-7 dated 20.9.2007 and the subsequent action of the 1st respondent in not considering the petitioners revision and allowing the same as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and set aside the said orders of the 2nd respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No. 26246 of 2008 ORDER: 1 According to the petitioner, which is a minority educational institution, the 2nd respondent herein passed an order on 20.09.2007 suspending the Managing Committee of the petitioner institution and handed over the management to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Secunderabad and immediately thereafter questioning the said order, the petitioner preferred a statutory revision before the first respondent and no orders have yet been passed. Hence the petitioner approached this Court and filed the present Writ Petition. 2 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. 3 As the revision preferred by the petitioner before the competent authority i.e. the first respondent is pending, this Court is of the view that without going into the merits of the case this Writ Petition can be disposed of. 4 Accordingly the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to decide the revision said to have been preferred by the petitioner on 15.11.2007 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs. ------------------------- SRI T.G.K, J. 15.12.2008 C.C. in two days B/o kvsn