IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6703 of 2010 1. SEEMA KUMARI W/O SRI SANTOSH KUMAR R/O VILL.- SAIDPUR, P.O.+P.S. HILSA, DISTT.- NALANDA AT BIHARSHARIF Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, NALANDA AT BIHARSHARIF 4. THE DISTRICT TEACHERS EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, NALANDA AT BIHARSHARIF 5. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NAGAR PANCHAYAT, HILSA (NALANDA) 6. SRI DIGVIJAY KUMAR S/O SRI SURESH PRASAD R/O VILL.- SABCHAK, P.O. WAHAPUR, P.S. KARAIPUR SURAJ, DISTT.- NALANDA ----------- 2 17/01/2011 Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner vehemently argues before this Court that the petitioner was neither heard nor noticed before annexure-1 came to be issued by the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Nalanda at Biharsharif which is dated 9.6.2009. If what has been stated at the Bar is correct based on the assertion made in the writ application, then obviously, there is violation of the principles of natural justice because any person who is going to be affected by such a decision specially a decision by a quasi judicial - 2 - authority must be passed after hearing the parties to the dispute. In view of the above, this matter is remitted back to the Appellate Authority with a direction that they will verify the position with regard to the impleadment of the parties and notice to her on the issue before passing of the impugned order. If the fact is otherwise correct, then the matter will be re-heard and a fresh order would be required to be passed and if it is not correct, then annexure-1 will remain. This exercise must be completed within a period of two months from the date the petitioner appears before the Appellate Authority with a copy of this order. This writ application stands disposed of with the direction aforesaid. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)