IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 5TH JULY 2011 / 14TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 17430 of 2011(C) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- M.RAJAN,MOTOR VEHICLES INSPECTOR, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE,PATHANAMTHITTA, RESIDING AT THEKKUPURATHU, T.B.ROAD, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. SRI.M.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, TRANSPORT BHAVAN,THIRVUANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. J.JERAD,MOTOR VEHICLES INSPECTOR, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE N.S, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SMITHA SUKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.17430/2011 C APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.A4/17/TC/2011 DTD. 15/06/2011. P2: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD. 29/06/2011. P3: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.G3/2405/TC/2011 DTD 18/02/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 17430 OF 2011 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT This Writ Petition has been filed challenging Ext.P1 order of transfer. Subsequent to the institution of this Writ Petition, the petitioner has filed I.A.No.10406/2011 with prayer to accept documents marked as Exts.P2 and P3. Thus, it is obvious that as against Ext.P1 order of transfer, the petitioner has already moved the government through Ext.P2. Since the petitioner has filed Ext.P2 before the first respondent, I am inclined to dispose of this Writ Petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observation regarding the merits of the contentions raised by the petitioner in this Writ Petition (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc W.P.(C) NO. 2 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. JUDGMENT September, 2010 W.P.(C) NO. 3