Sinia ‘Bgnah _ )M /@@ m Preaem‘m; _ ; w xm‘Vqfml’ \ datad.m{mzz:r..:.n,.T..,.1...Twannwum IN THE HIGH COURT OF !UDEQATURE AT 3ILASI’UR CHHATTISGARH WRNO. if; 1:1 {2%@% 3 Dr. Gajendra Kunmr Saxena, Aged about 52 years, 5/0. Late Dr. HP. Saxena R/O. Commumiy Eeaiih Ce‘n’ter, Koma, District Dantewada (Bastar) PETETIONER J} State of Chhath‘sgarh ’/ Through: th Secyeh’try, Health & Medicai Services, D.KS. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) Director, Health & Medical Services, Raipur (CG) Chief Medical and Health Officer, v District Hospital, Dantewada, Distt. Dantewada, (CG) VJRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IDI NA g ., w mF / VERSUS g z RESPONDENTS . x “‘9‘ §.:A..H.q.;1’ .9. %‘i ’ 200 mm (mama) mmm WWW1§wW $3§fcmm 1$m1i2005 Shri Mano] Paraniape: counsei forthe petitioner, Shri Bha$kar Payasi. P.L. for the State5respondents. Heard on LA. No. Q797/2 004 for urgent hearing. It is allowed, The instant petition has) been filed by the petitioner, who is a Senior Doctor, to iosue a direction to tt e respondents to consider his prayer with regard to his posting on the ground that his mother aged 75 years old, is suffering from throat oanoer and in his presert place of posting ire, at Dantewada there is no cancer hospttal to treat his moth'er. Learned counsel for t e petitioner further submitted that his earlier representation for allocation w s allowed by the Union of lndta on the same ground that his mother is suffer rig from cancer and that she ts getting treatment at Bhilai hospitat and certain va ancies are avaitable in Bhiiai and Raipur and the representation is made purely o humanitarian grounds, Learned counset for the petitioner submits that though [e has made representation vide Annexure P42 t t been considered and no order has been passed and P43 but the same has not by the respondents on his repre entation. I Learned counsel for t State/respondents have no objection if it is directed that the representatio of the petitioner for the reiief which has been ciaimed by the instant petitio is made to the respondents and directed to consider the representation wit i have heard learned cojunsel for the parties and l am of the opinion that i the prayer of the petitioner des rves to be allowed on humanitarian ground and the representations submitted y the petitioner vide Annexure P42 and P43 i in a specified period. 4 .W, XI—HC-78 WW, @é Q1 é‘, W Hal-[[egi 200 maféam WW§§$W %a‘1’a’qm respondents. The respondents are directed to deserves coneideratiom of the consider the representations cf Annexure P42 and P43 submitted by the petitioner within twc months from the production of this order and they shail decide the same and inform the With the aforesaid directi \io. 5182004 and LA. Nos 9798/2004 and 9/ i DIMENDRA MISHRA Judge Consequently} MWP. 9797/2004 stand disposed of. mm (W52) aetitioner about their decision. on, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- i