IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28570 of 2008 DHARMENDRA KUMAR GUPTA S/O SRI RAMESHWAR PRASAD GUPTA. ----PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. VINOD KUMAR GUPTA S/O BANGALI LAL GUPTA 3. SUNITA DEVI W/O VINOD KUMAR GUPTA. ---- OPP. PARTIES. ----------- 03 23.08.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks cancellation of anticipatory bail granted in favour of opposite party nos. 2 and 3 who are facing charge(s) punishable under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Sections 498A and 306 of the Penal Code. Opposite party nos. 2 and 3 are bhaisur (elder brother) and wife of the elder brother of the husband of the victim. Learned Court below while granting the bail observed as under:- “....Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are Bhaisur and Gotni of the informant nothing specific has been alleged against the petitioners, specific allegation is made against the husband of the informant due to which informant herself set fire on her body, after her death due to burn injury section 306 IPC was added, but the petitioners are not responsible for the same and as such, under the circumstances, arrest of the petitioners can not be justified.....” Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was certain suppression of fact on behalf of the petitioner. This Court is not satisfied that a case for cancellation of bail is made out. There is no merit in this application. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)