IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17591 of 2011 Indal Mahto & Anr. Versus The State Of Bihar -------- 03 24.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Petitioners are named in a case registered under section 302 of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act. According to the prosecution case itself, none has seen the actual killing of the deceased and the informant has only claimed to have seen the petitioners fleeing from the place of the occurrence and at that time, petitioner no.1 was carrying fire arms in his hand. It would appear from annexure 2 that there is partition dispute between the parties and much prior to the present case, petitioners and one Rajendra Mahto had filed Partition suit no. 211/2004 against the informant of the present case and others. Considering the facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, Indal Mahto and Indrajeet Mahto, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Gaunaha P.S. Case No. 4 of 2011. Shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)