.w a .qe £h IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) ‘15} /2005 WRIT PETITION NO. PETITIONER / 36 Shankar years, Lal son Pandey, of Motilal aged about Pandey, resident of Irrigation Collony, Janjgir, working as Helper, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (CG) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh through : the Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) RESPONDENTS The Chief Engineer, Department of Irrigation, Dau Kalyan Sing Bhawan, Raipur’ (CG) The Executiyte Engineer, Department of Irrigation, Janjgir— Champa (Chhattisgarh) The Sub *Divsional Officer I g(irrigation), Department o ~ f Irrigation, Janjgir Branch Canal Janjgir Hasdeo Project, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (CG) WRIT PETITIONIUNDER ARTICLE 226/ 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, §‘¢ K h i / XI-HC—22 54-ZOO§ ‘ Mr. v.3. Tfwari, counsel for Mr. sandeep Dubey. Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents. Heard both the counseL graduate. regumrisation “as per Rule 6 S the petitioner. Recruitment and Conditions of From the perusal‘of the made any representation to the spondents. ln the circumstances. learned counsel for the petitioner subm' that the petitioner may be allowed to make a representation to respondent o.2 raising his grievances and respondent same. To this submission, Mr. Dubey, No.2 be directed to decide teamed counsel for the State has Having heard learned cou sei for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is allowed to make a representation to respondent No By this writ petition, the petitioner has raised grievance that he was appointed on 1-9-1987 as daily wager. sinoe then he is working, he has also undergone training during the course of his employment. and he is a The petitioner’s services are not being considered for (1) of the Contingent Paid Employees ce Rules, 1977. ition it appears that the petitioner has never o obiection. raising all his grievances, and reepondent No.2 shall decide the same considering all the grievances raised by the petitioner vvithin a period of twp months fromithe date of receipt of the representation, in accordance with law. With the direction aforesaid, the petition stands‘disposed of. e Consequently, lA.No.2431 12005 also stands disposed of. Parties are entitled for cerh' fled copy of this order. ~ \ Soma ° t . i L-‘