IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 30TH JUNE 2011 / 9TH ASHADHA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 5052 of 2011() ----------------------------- CRMP.949/2011 of D.C. & SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM CRIME NO.213/2011 OF PUTHENCRUZ POLICE STATION .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 ------------------------------ ELDHO GEORGE, AGED 39, S/O.GEORGE, CHALAKKATTUKUDIYIL VEEDU, PANCODE KARA, AIKKARANADU NORTH VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.SHAJI THANKAPPAN SRI.PRAMOD KOCHUTHOMMEN.E. RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT -------------------------- 1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUTHENCRUZ POLICE STATION. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. --------------------------- Bail Appln.No.5052 of 2011 --------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of June, 2011 ORDER Petitioner, who is accused No.1 in Crime No.213 of 2011 of Puthencruz Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 381, 454, 461, 411 & 34 I.P.C., seeks his enlargement on bail. The petitioner was arrested on 04/06/2011. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioner and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. Dated this the 30th day of June, 2011. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. skj