Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.1292 of 2008. Dated of Decision: July 23, 2009. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rajinder Singh. ……… Petitioner. Versus H.R.T.C. and others. …….. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Adarsh Vashisth, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 4. None for respondent No.5. Deepak Gupta,J (oral) : By means of this writ petition, the petitioner, who is working as Chief Inspector has challenged the order dated 9th June, 2008, whereby he was transferred from Dharamshala to Rampur. On perusal of para 6(b) of the petition, we find that the petitioner after his appointment served only for three months at Shimla. Thereafter he was posted at Baijnath, which is not very far from Dharamshala. He spent only nine - 2 - months at Baijnath and was thereafter posted at Dharamshala and served there till 2006 when he was promoted and posted at Pathankot, which is also merely 60 K.Ms from Dharamshala. Thereafter on his request, he was again transferred to Dharamshala. The petitioner has managed to remain in Dharamshala virtually for his entire service career. No employee has a vested right to remain posted in one station for such a long period. Therefore, the petition is rejected. Stay order is vacated. All pending applications are accordingly disposed of. (Deepak Gupta) Judge (Surinder Singh) Judge July 23, 2009. (Pds)