IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40627 of 2009 PRANAV KUMAR @ RAJAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that initially when Saharsa P.S. Case No. 193 of 2009 was lodged under sections 307/34 of Indian Penal Code there was no whisper against the petitioner in the FIR but much later some statement has been made by some witnesses about the petitioner which by itself make the whole thing suspicious because if the participation of the petitioner was there then at the first time his name should be in the FIR. This is a good ground for giving the benefit of doubt at this state. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Pranav Kumar @ Rajan Singh be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- (Rs. Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa P.S. Case No. 193 of 2009. One of the sureties to be executed by the father of the petitioner and other by the mother of the petitioner on due identification of the court below. Petitioner will cooperate in the trial by appearing on each and every date fixed in the case either by himself or by his counsel. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)