1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1622 OF 2004 SUMMONS NO. 1622 OF 2004 SUMMONS NO. 1622 OF 2004 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 96 OF 2002 IN ARBITRATION CASE NO. 19 OF 2000 Dinesh Shah ... Plaintiff Versus Ravi Sharma ... Defendant Mr. Chetan Kapadia i/by Harakchand & Co. for Plaintiff. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M. KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M. KHANWILKAR,J. DATED DATED DATED : JUNE 28, 2005 : JUNE 28, 2005 : JUNE 28, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard counsel for the Plaintiff. None appears for the defendant. No reply has been filed on behalf of the Defendants judgement debtor. Affidavit in support of the chamber summons has remained uncontroverted. For the nature of allegations chamber summons made absolute in terms of Prayer Clause (a). (A.M. (A.M. (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J.) KHANWILKAR,J.) KHANWILKAR,J.)