IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37511 of 2008 1. Makeshwar Thakur @ Manna Thakur. 2. Kamla Kant Thakur 3. Kala Kant Thakur @ Bilesh Thakur 4. Arun Kumar Thakur, All sons of Jay Narayan Thakur @ Lalo Thakur 5. Jay Narayan Thakur @ Lalo Thakur, Son of late Samoli Thakur All resident of Village Maharathpur, PS Mufasil, District Begusarai. ---- Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Ram Kumar Thakur, Son of Binoy Kumar Thakur, Resident of Village Baharathpur, PS Mufassil, District Begusarai ---- Opposite Parties For the State : Mr. Gauri Shanker Gupta, A.P.P. ----------- 2 21.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 28.3.2008 passed in Cr. Revision No. 491 of 2005 by which the Court has rejected the discharge application of the petitioners and found them prima facie guilty of the offences under Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the case diary, the injury report does not indicate that the injury was grievous in nature rather it has been said that final report would be given after X-ray. The Court below has relied on the photo copy of the supplementary injury report which perhaps is not in the case diary, because it has been mentioned that the photo copy of the supplementary injury report was filed along with the protest petition. Cognizance was taken on the basis of the protest petition. In the circumstances aforesaid, I find no reason to interfere with the order impugned. This application is dismissed. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)