IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19054 of 2010 SAKET YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------------ 03/ 20.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Manpur P.S. Case no. 10 of 2010 registered under sections 25(i-b) a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that recovery has been made from a ditch and on suspicion the petitioner has been roped in the present case. The seizure list does not depict the name of the petitioner. I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner merely because the case relates to seizure of illegal arms but considering the materials on record it appears that recovery has not been made from the petitioner which is good ground for regular bail. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is dismissed. Let the learned court below consider regular bail of the petitioner in view of the observations made above and may dispose off regular bail application of the petitioner, if possible, on the same day. shahid (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)