-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 557 OF 2010 Mahadev Maruti Nirmal. ..Appellant. Versus Sou. Suman Mahadev Nirmal. ..Respondent. Mr. V. B. Tapkir for the appellant. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : July 1, 2011. P. C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. The respondent filed Marriage Petition No.259 of 2005 for declaration that the marriage between herself and the appellant is null and void on the ground that the appellant was already married to some other woman at the time of their marriage. This marriage petition was allowed by the trial Court. The appeal preferred by the appellant before the first appellate Court was dismissed and therefore the present Second Appeal. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant does not dispute that the appellant was already married to some other woman at the time of his marriage with the respondent. He submitted that the said marriage was nullity and therefore there was no need for the respondent to ask for declaration. The submission is devoid of srp -: 2 :- merit. The respondent can always approach the competent court for declaration to that effect. No question of law, much less the substantial question of law is raised. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant further submitted that in view of the impugned order, services of the appellant are terminated. The remedy of the appellant would be to challenge the said order of termination of services before the appropriate forum/Court. Learned counsel submitted that in fact the appellant has already challenged the termination before the competent authority. In my view, termination of services cannot be ground to entertain this second appeal. 4. In the light of above discussion, Second Appeal is dismissed. 5. In view of the disposal of the appeal, nothing survives for consideration in C.A. No. 856 of 2009 and same is also disposed of accordingly. (RANJIT MORE, J.)