IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 3192 of 2005 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29th Sept.,2011. Shakuntla Devi ...Petitioner Versus Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Present: Mr.Jagbir Malik Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Mohnish Sharma Advocate for the respondents. * * * Nirmaljit Kaur, J.(Oral) This is a petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order (Annexure P-9) dated 11.02.2005 as well as to grant the family pension to the petitioner from the date of death of her husband along with interest. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the relief claimed by the petitioner is squarely covered by the ratio of the judgment rendered in CWP No.8873 of 2010 decided on 30.03.2011 titled as Daya Devi Vs. D.H.B.V.N. Etc. Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the said fact. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of in the same terms as CWP No.8873 of 2010 decided on 30.03.2011 with the direction to the respondents to reconsider the claim of the petitioner for grant of family pension and decide it within the period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. (Nirmaljit Kaur) 29th September, 2011. Judge Seema-II