IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43222 of 2010 KALAWATI KUER, W/O LATE BRIJ NANDAN TIWARY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BISHUNPURA, P.S. UNAWANTNAGAR, DISTRICT BHOJPUR ----PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR----------------------------------------------------OPP.PARTY ----------- 2. 26.3.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No one appears for the State. The petitioner prays for anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is that she had connived with the Manager of the Bank and other State authorities in order to withdraw the term deposit of Rs.79,548/- made by late father of the informant in Behea Branch. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute in the family. It is further submitted that the alleged father of the informant had himself in two Title Suits made statement that he had no issue and hence the stand of the informant that she is the daughter of late Ram Naresh Tiwary appears to be false. It is further submitted that the petitioner is a widowed lady and further the Branch 2 Manager had already been granted anticipatory bail by learned Sessions Judge. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that the petitioner Kalawati Kuer, in the event of her arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arrah, in connection with Behea P.S.Case No. 78/09, subject to the other conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) Spal/