^ ? 1^° ^ B@nc^ 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.rS)No. U^S^ of 2009. ^" PETITIONER : Beeju Singh, aged about 53 years, Son of Late Shri Jhirga Singh, .^\ f Residentof Raju Vihar Near Woman A'^- .'•'* Industrial Training Institute Korba ^,;\:?--" ..••'' ^> <SX.'}S.'..^^7\.-''' ^A ^y 'y (C.G.). VE R S US RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Secretary, Department of Schedule Caste, Back ward and Minority welfare D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.). ^ 2. Development Officer /Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayt Korba, (C.G.). •^w^iy r" 3. Assistant Commissioner, development ofSchedule Tribe, Korba, (C.G.). ^' 4. Prabhat Sharma, Assistant Clerk, Grade-2VikashkhandKorba, (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS "2 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition fS) No. 4235 of 2009 Petitioner Beeju Singh Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh 85 others . WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 8s 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri R. K. Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P. K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the respondents No. 1 to 3. O R D ER (Orall (Passed on this 19th day of March, 2010) 1: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been paid salaiy for the month of March, 2004, May, June, October and December, 2007, March, April, July and August, 2008, while he was working on the post of Peon in Janpad Panchayat Korba. 2. In response to the petition, an affidavit was field by the respondents N. 1 to 3, wherein it is clearly stated that the salary has been paid to the petitioner for the above stated period. In support of the submission the chart (Annexure R/l) has been filed. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though the payment of salary might have been sanctioned but no cheque has been deposited in the bank account of the petitioner. Thus, the payment has not actually been made to the petitioner. 4. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondents, to look into the grievance of the ^-.s.-^ ,^«^^% @ ^- petitioner and if payment of salaiy has yet not been made, the same may be released to the petitioner, as early as possible, preferably within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. No order asto costs. Thakur "L- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge