21.12.2009 Present: Mr. K.D.Sood counsel for the appellants. RSA No. 592 of 2009. The only question involved in this case is that which party is owner in possession of the suit land. The appellants-defendants have taken a specific plea that they have become owners by way of adverse possession of the suit land; thereby admitting the ownership of the plaintiff over the suit. In fact the other plea taken by the defendant was that the suit was bad for mis-joinder of parties, since the other co- owners had not been joined in the suit. This also shows that the defendants admitted the ownership of the plaintiff on the suit land. The question as to whether it is the plaintiff or the defendant who is in possession of the suit land is a pure question of law and no question of law much less a substantial question of law is involved in the present appeal. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed in limine. 21st December, 2009 ( Deepak Gupta ) ™ Judge