IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 23RD JULY 2009 / 1ST SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 20671 of 2009(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ N.SALIM, S/O.NARAYANAN, AGED 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT MAMBAEKKATTIL HOUSE, CHEVAYUR, KOZHIKODE-17. PRESENTLY WORKING AS MANAGER, CALICUT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., F953, CORPORATION OFFICE, CALICUT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE CALICUT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.F953, CORPORATION OFFICE, CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE ASST.REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KOZHIKODE. 3. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 20671 OF 2009 (D) ===================== Dated this the 23rd day of July, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that as a result of registration of Crime No.218/05 by the Aranmula Police Station in relation to the death of his wife, he was placed under suspension in contemplation of disciplinary action. However, subsequently he has been reinstated and is now continuing in service as Manager of the Society. 2. According to the petitioner on account of the suspension, even now he is being paid only the basic wages that is payable. It is stated that on investigation, he has been deleted from the array of accused and by Ext.P8, the 2nd respondent has issued necessary intimation to the 1st respondent also. Despite this, considering Ext.P8, orders have not been passed, as a result of which, the period during which he was kept under suspension has not been regularised and he is continuing to be paid only basic salary. 3. Taking into account the aforesaid grievance, the only direction that is called for at this stage is to direct the 1st WPC 20671/09 :2 : respondent to consider Ext.P8 and pass consequential orders. This the 1st respondent shall do, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp