IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15833 of 2011 Rajeev Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar Through C.B ----------- 03/ 4th July 2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the C.B.I. Petitioner, once upon a time, being unsuccessful in getting his privilege recognized at the lower court level, agitated the matter before this Court. There happens to be an allegation to the effect that he along with other employees of the Insurance Company got fake insurance policy under so many heads and then made false claim and got the cheques issued in their name. It has been contended on behalf of the petitioner that no specific allegation subsists against him save and except having an omnibus nature. It has also been submitted that the real fact is that his letter pad has been used fraudulently by other co-accused and that happens to be the reason behind his implication in this case. It has further been contended that charge- 2 sheet has been submitted but the court is yet to take cognizance, although, non bailable warrant of arrest has been issued. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the C.B.I. opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that by having charge-sheet against him for the present, there happens to be sufficient material. He also submits that the conduct of the petitioner that he evaded himself from his appearance since 2006 and it should also to be noted down. Taking into account the allegation in consonance with the conduct of the petitioner, I do not see it a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer is refused. It is further directed that petitioner should surrender before the lower court within a fortnight with a prayer for regular bail which should be disposed of on the same day. perwez (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)