IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO.479 OF 1996 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.54 OF 1995 CONNECTED WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.168 OF 1994 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.101 OF 1989 Canara Bank ...Applicant Versus V.C.Kumaran ...Petitioner ...... Ms.Yamini Chandran i/b M/s.Umesh Shetty & Co. for Applicant. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. FEBRUARY 1, 2008. FEBRUARY 1, 2008. FEBRUARY 1, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Inspite of opportunity given to the Applicant to ascertain as to whether the Application survives for consideration, Counsel for the Applicant submits that no instructions could be obtained as the Applicant was not contactable. 2. I have already noted in my order dated : 2 : 25th January 2008 that the Scheme has been propounded as back as in the year 1996 and in absence of stay, the same must have been acted upon by all concerned. At this distance of time, it is not possible to reverse that position. Hence, this Application is dismissed. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.