1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10451 of 2010 Kailas s/o. Dhondiram Mhaske and another. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents Mr. Vinod P. Patil, Advocate for petitioners Mr. S.K. Kadam, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 5. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE M.T. JOSHI,JJ. DATE : 24th March, 2011. PER COURT : 1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the concerned authorities to take appropriate action against respondent Nos. 22 to 24, for carrying out illegal/unauthorized construction and to remove the encroachment. 2] Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners would be satisfied, if they are allowed to make representation for appropriate relief/action against these respondents (Respondent Nos. 22 to 24) with further direction to decide their representation, within time frame. 3] We have perused the writ petition and we are satisfied this petition can be conveniently disposed of by the following order :- 2 O R D E R "It is open to the petitioners to make appropriate representation/application to the concerned authority, for seeking appropriate action against the alleged illegal construction carried out by respondent Nos. 22 to 24, and/or, to remove the encroachment. If any such representation is made, same may be considered and decided on merits, in accordance with law. If the alleged construction is found to be illegal, the concerned authority shall take appropriate action against said respondents, by following due procedure of law, immediately thereafter.” With these observations, writ petition is disposed of. [M.T. JOSHI,J] [D.B. BHOSALE,J.] grt/wp