1 CP-22-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 22 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8072 OF 2010 Amrish Kilachand & Anr. ... Petitioners Vs. Tanil Kolachand & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Kari Tamborly i/b. Ms. Natash Bopaish i/b. Bharucha & Partners, Advocates, for the petitioners. Ms.Reena Salunkhe, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 & 3. Ms. V.C.Khatri,Advocate for the respondent No.4. Mr. Dhiraj Mhetre, i/b. Desai & Diwanji, Advocates, for respondent Nos. 19 to 22. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 29th June, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners. 2. It appears that inspite of the order passed by this Court to implead the petitioners as parties in the suit, the respondent No.1 had not impleaded them and obtained certain orders. The orders were not against the petitioners, but against other respondents and that order is also challenged by the concerned respondents. This Contempt Petition is filed only because the petitioners were not impleaded in the suit. 2 CP-22-11.sxw 3. In my opinion, no case is made out to take action for contempt. If the petitioners are aggrieved y any order, they may take appropriate steps for recalling the order. Petition stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)