IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-26524 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 15, 2011 Anshuman Bajaj. …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Gurbachan Singh Bhatia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State. Mr. Surjit Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jagdev Singh, Advocate, for the complainant.. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This is a petition seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 752 dated 22.11.2008, under Section 498A, 406, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Central, Faridabad. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has been enlarged on bail pursuant to the CRM M-26524 of 2009 directions issued by this Court dated 23.09.2009 and he has joined the investigation. Learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, on the instructions of ASI Satbir Singh, states that the petitioner has joined the investigation. Learned counsel for the complainant has opposed the bail application. He states that dowry articles have not been recovered, hence, custodial interrogation is must. There is a dispute about the dowry articles. As to how much dowry was given can not be decided at the stage of investigation. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. Order dated 23.09.2009 is made absolute, subject to the limitations provided under Section 438(2) of the Code. Petitioner-accused shall participate in the investigation as and when he is required. February 15, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2