IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11774 of 2011 SAVITRI DEVI, WIFE OF GOPAL SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Umanath Mishra, A.P.P. --------- 2. 11.4.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code and 33/44 of the Electricity Act. It is alleged against one Shanti Devi, who has consumed the electricity illegally, the loss has been calculated to the tune of Rs.80,000/-. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is Savitri Devi and she has different consumer number and has paid up-to-date electricity bill. It appears absurd that the informant, who was an Assistant Engineer of the Electricity Department, the police officer and the learned Magistrate are not aware about the present Electricity Act, 2003 as the case has been registered under a reported Act the F.I.R. has been lodged without mentioning the consumer number. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below 2 within a period of 12 weeks from today in connection with Bikramganj P.S. case No.210 of 2010 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. S.Ali/Narendra ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. )