IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2011 / 26TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 7066 of 2011(G) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- SRI.SAJI VARGHESE, PLANT MANAGER, MRF LIMITED, VADAVATHOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 010. BY ADV. SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR SRI.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS SRI.P.GOPINATH RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. MRF EMPLOYEES SANGH (BMS), HOUSE NO.401/D, NSS BUILDING, VADAVATHOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 010, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOTTAYAM-686 002. 3. DY.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KANJIRAPPALLY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 507. 4. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAMPADY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 502. 5. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANARCADU, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 019. R1 BY ADV. SRI.S.MANU R2 TO R5 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.C.M.CHARISMA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.7066/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE NOTICE EXHIBITED BY THE IST RESPONDENT UNION IN THEIR NOTICE BOARD. P2:- COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD. 6.3.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. *********************** W.P(C) No.7066 of 2011 ***************************** Dated this the 17th day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT BASANT, J. Petition for police protection. Interim order was issued on 07.03.2011. The 1st respondent, ie. the sole party respondent, has entered appearance. The learned counsel for the 1st respondent submits that at the moment, there is absolutely no law and order situation. The 1st respondent has no objection against the interim order dated 07.03.2011 being made absolute. On 07.03.2011, the following interim direction was issued by this Court. “Interim direction is issued to respondents 2 to 5 to ensure that there is no blockade in front of the main gate, administrative office, the building or any way within the premises of the company, by which, willing workers, officials and customers of the company and their vehicles are obstructed by respondent No.1 or its members from having ingress and egress to the building. We make it W.P(C) No.7066 of 2011 2 clear that this shall not affect the rights of the 1st respondent to carry on peaceful demonstrations outside the gate of the establishment.” 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays, the learned counsel for the contesting respondent does not oppose and the learned Government Pleader accepts that the interim order dated 07.03.2011 can be made absolute and this proceedings can be closed. 3. In the result: a) This Writ Petition is allowed; b) The interim order dated 07.03.2011 extracted above is made absolute. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE) rtr/