CRM-M No.37040 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CRM-M No.37040 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.02.2011 Shankar Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Ms. Amita Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana for the State. ... Alok Singh, J (Oral). This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.212 dated 24.12.2009 under Sections 381 IPC and under Section 43(B)/ 66(D) of Information Technology Act, P.S. DLF Phase-1, Gurgaon. Learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, states that the Investigating Officer was away to Bombay in connection with investigation of another case, hence petitioner could not be released on bail pursuant to the order dated 24.12.2010. He further states on the instructions of Mr. CRM-M No.37040 of 2010 2 Harminder Singh, Investigating Officer, that let petitioner appear before the Investigating Officer, he shall be released on bail pursuant to the order dated 24.12.2010 passed by this Court. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. Order dated 24.12.2010 is made absolute, subject to the limitations provided under Section 438(2) of the Code. Petitioner – accused shall participate in the investigation as and when he is required. However, it is clarified that if the petitioner fails to join investigation, the Investigating Officer shall be at liberty to move appropriate application for cancellation of bail. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 09.02.2011 sk.