IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 117 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 05/11/2008 in WP NO : 10504 OF 2001 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 N.Devidas, S/o Subramanyam Iyer, H.No. 1-12-45 & 46, Jambikunta, Medak. 2 R.Vijaya Reddy, S/o Narsimha Reddy, H.No. 1-12-47, Jambikunta, Medak. ..... APPELLANTS AND 1 The Nagar Panchayat, Rep. by its Commissioner, Medak. 2 Mandal Revenue Officer, Medak Mandal, Medak. 3 Surender Goud, S/o. Not known Medak. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.K.V.BHANU PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari ) When this Writ Appeal is taken up for admission, learned counsel for the appellant, sought permission of the court to withdraw the Writ Appeal with a liberty to pursue the remedies with the Collector, Medak District, more particularly in view of the letter LR No.E1/4918/08 dated 18.7.2008 written from the office of the District Collector, Medak to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Medak. While according permission, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with a liberty to pursue the remedies pursuant to the letter dated 18.7.2008 written from the office of the District Collector, Medak at Sangareddy to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Medak, suggesting to allot the land encroached to the encroachers on market value in terms of Resolution No. 59 dated 28.10.1997 passed by the Narga Panchayath. No order as to costs. _____________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari _________________________ Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy February 6, 2009 MAS