IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated : Nainital the 09th May, 2011 Order on the bail application of accused Fourth Bail Application No.3 of 2011 CRIMINAL SIDE Brijpal s/o Bhasso Singh Saini … Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand … Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No.156 of 2009 Under Sections 395, 397, 412 IPC P.S. Kotwali Laksar District Haridwar Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. Parikshit Saini, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. S. S. Adhikari, the learned A.G.A. for the State. This is the fourth bail application. The first bail application was dismissed as not pressed vide order dated 30.03.2010. The second bail application was dismissed on merit vide order dated 20.05.2010. Third bail application was rejected for want of prosecution vide order dated 16.08.2010. Fourth bail application has now been moved. The second bail application of the applicant was dismissed by the court on merit after taking into consideration that the applicant was involved in three dacoities on the same night and that cash & mobile phone was recovered from the possession of the applicant. In the light of the aforesaid, the court found that it was not a fit case to grant bail to the applicant. The present bail application has again been filed on the same ground and no new ground has been mentioned. Consequently, the court is not inclined to grant bail to the applicant. The fourth bail application is rejected. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 09.05.2011 LSR