HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 21st October, 2008 Bail Application No. 461 of 2008 Order on the bail application of the accused. Arshad S/o Khalid ……. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ……. Opposite Party ____________________________________________________________ Case Crime No. 87 of 2006 U/s 2/3 U.P. Gangster & Antisocial Activities Prohibition Act Police Station Clamntown District Dehradun Hon’ble J. C. S. Rawat, J. Heard Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the applicant; Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for the State; and perused the record. I have gone through the averments made in para 4 to 17 of the bail petition as well as paragraph Nos. 7 to 16 of the counter affidavit. Either the accused has been granted bail during the investigation or after conviction or the final report has been filed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case in totality; I find that it is a fit case for bail. Let the accused/applicant be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat,, J.) Dated 21.10.2008 Shiv