THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.19609 OF 2003 Dated 7th September, 2009 Between: M/s Kamal Wineries, Nandigama Village ….Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep. By its Principal Secretary to the Government and four others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : None appeared Counsel for respondents 1 to 4 : G.P for Prohibition & Excise The Court made the following O R D E R: As there was no representation for the petitioner, when the writ petition was called on 02.09.2009, it was ordered to be posted “for dismissal”. Today also, although the writ petition is posted under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J Dated 7th September, 2009 vrn