THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED C.R.P. No. 1218 of 2009 ORDER: This revision is preferred aggrieved by the inaction of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Anakapalle in disposing E.A.No. 24 of 2007 in E.P.No.11 of 2006 in O.S.No.17 of 2003. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner herein is the auction purchaser. The second respondent, who is plaintiff, filed the suit for recovery of money basing on the Pronote against respondents 3 and 4 herein and obtained attachment before judgment. Subsequently the suit was decreed. The second respondent brought the attached property into court auction. The petitioner herein purchased the attached property in court auction. E.A. No.24 of 2007 is filed by a third party, who is first respondent herein to set-aside the auction sale dated 27.11.2006 conducted in E.P.No.11 of 2006. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner-auction purchaser contends that though there is urgency in the matter, the learned judge kept the E.A. pending for a long time and if the E.A. is not disposed of, the rights of the petitioner- auction purchaser will be defeated. 4. Heard the learned counsel and perused the record. The suit is of the year 2003. The petitioner-auction purchaser and the third respondent-judgment debtor No.1 filed their respective counters dated 12.03.2007 and 15.4.2008 in the E.A. Instead of keeping the E.A. pending for a long time, the learned judge ought to have disposed of the E.A. 5. In the circumstances, the C.R.P. is allowed. The learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Anakapalle, is directed to dispose of E.A.No.24 of 2007 in E.P.No.11 of 2006 in O.S.No.17 of 2003 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from today. No order as to costs. ____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED,J 30.10.2009 Stp