.a ”J 3fagh 3mm?! IN TEE HIGH COURT OF JUPICATURE AT BILASPUR(CaGo) Cw. Miw. a. petition No. [g] OF 2'006 (Petition Under aecticn 482 of Criminal Procedure Code) TIONERs a 1. Radha Raman Gupta,son of shri Ram Narayan Gupta,aged about ‘ 45 years,resident of quarter No.7, Hukmi Colony,Gharghoda Dis trict-Raigarh( Co G.) smt.‘ Meana Gupta,daughter of Raman Gupta,aged about 4i years resioent of Quarter No.7,Hukmi C olony ,Gharghoda ,Distr ict- Raigarh(C.G.) VERSUS u The st&e of Chhattisgarh Through the DiStrict Magistrate, RaigarmcoGo) RONDENT ESP TION UNDER SECTION 48 ‘OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PETI MA. M ' ‘ gETI XI—HC-78 WW,W,W mm ‘ .Q.M2I9.:.J§.L.fzm UOG 200 .\ WW(W> anéimrm wmm WW§WW wwwm éxwm j 15.02.2007 Shri Sunil Sahu, Counsel for the peiitioners. Shri G.K. Beriwal, Dy. Advocate General for the State. Heard on admission. This petition is directed inst the order dated 14.3.2005 passed in Criminal Revision No.192/2004 y the Second Additional Sessions Judge, geigarh. The aforesaid Criminal Revision was med against-the order dated 19.7.2004 passed in Criminal C se No.240l2002 by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gharghoda. i ll appears that by the sa order dated 19/7/2004, while dismissing the application’tor taking specim n signatures of accusedipetitioner No.2 -— Smt. Meena Gupta. the lear Magistrate directed for collecting her specimen signatures from the oncerned official records of the period, during which, the ofl’ence is said o have been committed, for the purpose of comparison with the disputed d ument. Being aggrieved with the said g tiled, which was dismissed by the‘ ’ s order, the aforesaid revision Revisiona'l Court. There appears to be no ill gality in the steps taken by the Magistrate from the official records of petitioner No.2, sent for comparison were not found to be > sumcient by the expen and th expert had directs?! for sending fresh specimen signatures. l do not iind any illegality r irregularity in the orders passed by the 2 Courts wananting interference u der Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petition has not merit nd the same is dismissed in limine. / §W= Semi Kuma g“ S‘E'tdmga was? a n