IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.53271 of 2007 AMIT ANAND @ AMIT SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 15.5.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner is apprehending arrest in Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 60/04 for the offence under Section 302 of the I.P.C. Based on the statement made by the father of the deceased case of murder against unknown person was registered. This was in the month of June 2004. Matter had been under investigation for a long time and nothing substantial seems to have emerged in the said investigation in so far as the present petitioner is concerned. It is only recently that Dy. S.P. in his supervision note has tried to attribute motive to the petitioner and, therefore, as one of the suspects in the case because some altercation with regard to handing over of the chirkut of a land for which some considerations had been exchanged. But then there are other stories linked with the said incident which has emerged both in the investigation and also find reflection in the order of the learned Sessions Judge. Looking at the overall facts and situation that the police has not been able to pin down and identity the persona involved in the crime but are basically going on bits and piece of hearsay statements, let the petitioner, namely, Amit Anand @ Amit Singh, who also happens to be in public employment, in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail 2 bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties in the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Triveniganj P.S.Case No.60/04, subject to conditions under Section 438(II) of the Cr.P.C. Petitioner shall not misuse his privilege of bail in any manner. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)