: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.672 OF 2009 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.841 OF 2009 Anil Darekar .. Appellant V/s. Parth Developers & Anr. .. Respondents AND APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.673 OF 2009 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.842 OF 2009 Shyam Bhiku Pawar .. Appellants V/s. Parth Developers & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. Ditendra Mishra for the Appellants. Mr. Dhananjay Shukla i/b. Mr. M.U. Pandey for Respondent No.1. Mr. J.G. Reddy for Respondent No.2. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 8 TH DECEMBER, 2009. P.C.: 1. The learned Advocate for the appellants has no instructions in the matter. In fact, on 15th July, 2009, he had sought an adjournment in order to withdraw his appearance. In view of the fact that the learned Advocate has no instructions in the : 2 : matter, the Appeals from Orders are dismissed for non-prosecution. 2. The learned Advocate for respondent No.1 states that the suit structures in both the Appeals have been demolished by respondent No.2 after giving a hearing to the appellants. 3. In view of the above, Civil Applications pending in both the Appeals from Orders do not survive and the same are dismissed. .......