THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 568 of 2010. Smt. Shakuntala Negi W/O Sri Vikram Singh Negi … Petitioner. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and two others. …Respondents. Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K.C.Tiwari, Brief Holder, learned counsel for the respondents-State. Date July 23, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No. 3 to decide the representation dated 21-6-2010 (contained as Annexure-3 to the writ petition), wherein prayer has been made by the petitioner to permit her in the Special B.T.C. training course. A perusal of the record shows that the petitioner applied for Special B.T.C. course in the year 2006-07 and her counselling was also conducted. According to the petitioner she was selected for Special B.T.C. training course in the year 2007, but after counselling she was never called for such training. The petitioner made representation dated 21-6-2010 for inclusion of her name to the Special B.T.C. training programme, but the same is still pending before respondent no.3. According to the petitioner, she was selected for Special Training Course to be conducted in the year 2007. Since then more than three years have already elapsed. At this stage, no direction can be given to the respondent no. 3 to decide the representation of the petitioner pertaining to the Special B.T.C. course 2007. The writ petition being devoid of any merit is dismissed outright. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP