IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 15809 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 7th October, 2010. M/s Madhur Fiber Product Petitioner through Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner claims that the Municipal Council, Sangrur has wrongly held that the industrial unit of the petitioner is in urban area. It is urged that all the industrial units installed in the area of Focal Point Industrial Area of village Ram Nagar Sibia have been treated as the units set up in 'rural area' and have been granted margin money/subsidy. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the fact that the issues sought to be raised are disputed questions of fact in which no interference by this Court is called for at this stage, I dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation along with necessary certificates from the Municipal Council, Sangrur as well as the Gram Panchayat of the village concerned, if any, in support of its aforementioned claim and on receipt of such a representation, the respondents are directed to re-verify the facts, if so required, and take appropriate decision as per their policy/rules for the grant of margin money/subsidy within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is received. Disposed of. Dasti. October 07, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE