IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-12258 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 28, 2010 Hardeep Kaur and another .....Petitioners v. State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.J.S.Lalli, Advocate for the petitioners. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to respondent nos.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent nos.6 to 11. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied if respondent no.3, i.e., Senior Superintendent of Police, Khanna, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 24.4.2010, Annexure P2, already made to him by petitioner no.1, in this regard. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.3, i.e.,Senior Superintendent of Police, Khanna, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 24.4.2010, Annexure P2, already stated to have been moved to him by petitioner no.1. 28.4.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge