IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 10142 of 2008. Decided on: 09.12.2010. _________________________________________________________ Domneshwar Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. K.C. Sankhyan, Advocate vice Mr. T.C. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J.(Oral): It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the present lis is covered by the judgments rendered by this Court in Paras Ram versus State of H.P. and others, Latest HLJ 2009 (HP) 887 and Sita Ram versus State of H.P. and another, LPA No.36 of 2010, decided on 15th July, 2010. 2. Consequently, the petition is allowed. Respondents are directed to count the period of ad hoc service rendered by the petitioner followed by regularization for the purpose of increments and pensionary benefits, within a period of two months after the production of certified 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - copy of the judgment. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 09, 2010. (sck).