IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 7938 of 2008 Between: K. Varalakshmi, W/o. K. Venkata Ravi, R/o. Ramayanam Vari Street, Patamata, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its District Collector, Guntur District, Guntur. 2 The Joint Collector, Guntur District, Guntur. 3 The Tahsildar, Mangalagiri Mandal, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the ownership and possession of the petitioner over house plots admeasuring 238 square yards and 159.18 square yards situated in Sy.No. 774/4C of Nouluru Village, Yarrabalem Gram Panchayat, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District without following any due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Art. 14 and 300 A of the Constitution of India and consequenty to direct the respondents not to interfere with the ownership and peaceful possession of the petitioner over house plots admesuring 238 square yards and 159.18 square yards situated in Sy.No. 774/4C of Nouluru Village, Yarrablem Gram Panchayat, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.SUDHIR KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 7938 of 2008 Order: The petitioner claims to be purchaser of House Plots admeasuring 238 Sq. Yards and 159.18 Sq. yards, situated in Survey No. 774/4C of Nouluru village, Yarrabalem Gram Panchayat, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District, under different registered sale deeds. Now the grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents, without following the due process of law, are trying to evict her from the plots in question. Hence, she filed the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: In the event the respondents intend to evict the petitioner from the plots in question, they shall do so only after following the due process of law. Till then the respondents shall not evict the petitioner from the plots in question. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 23.04.2008 Ksr/Nsr