IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH MARCH 2011 / 20TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 4880 of 2011(H) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. N.SARADA, W/O.RAVEENDRAN, SARADA MANDIRAM, MYLOMKULAM MURI, KULAKKADA VILLAGE,KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. THULASEEDHARAN PILLAI, S/O.NARAYANA PILLAI, GOKULAM, CHATHANAMKULAM MURI, KILIKOLLUR VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.B.MOHANLAL, SRI.SAIJU S., SRI.T.PRASAD. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, POLICE HEADQUARTERS KOLLAM-1. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SASTHAMKOTTA P.O.,KOLLAM DISTRICT,PIN-690 521. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SASTHAMKOTTA POLICE STATION, SASTHAMKOTTA, KOLLAM DISTRICT-PIN-690 521. 4. SRI.T.KRISHNAN, AREEKKAL VADAKKAETHIL, KUNNATHOOR EAST P.O.,KUNNATHOR,KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-690 520. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. T.K.VIPINDAS R4 BY ADV. SRI.SOORANAD S.SREEKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.4880/2011 H APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT FOR THE YEAR 2010-2011 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KUNNATHOOR. P2: COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DTD. 03/02/2011 ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE 1ST PETITIONER AND THE 2ND PETITIONER. P3: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD. 11/02/2011 FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: R4(A): COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE DEPUTY LABOUR OFFICER,KOLLAM. R4(B): COPY OF THE LETTER GIVEN BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE SON OF THE 1ST PETITIONER. /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss R. BASANT & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 4880 of 2011-H ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT Basant,J. This judgment must be read in continuation of the orders dated 24/2/2011 and 8/3/2011. 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners as also the learned Government Pleader submit that in the conciliation conference held on 10/3/11, the disputes between the petitioner and the 4th respondent have been settled and a conciliation settlement dated 10/3/11 has been entered into. A copy of the said conciliation settlement is furnished to this Court. There is no representation for the 4th respondent. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners prays that notwithstanding the settlement, directions for police protection W.P.(C) No. 4880 of 2011 -: 2 :- may be ordered. We are not persuaded to agree. In view of the settlement of the disputes between the parties as per conciliation settlement dated 10/3/11, we find absolutely no necessity to issue any directions under Art.226 of the Constitution. If there is any violation of the conciliation settlement, the learned Government Pleader submits that the police shall be taking necessary action. 4. This writ petition is, in these circumstances, dismissed after recording the fact that the disputes have been settled vide conciliation settlement dated 10/3/2011. Sd/- R. BASANT (Judge) Sd/- K. SURENDRA MOHAN (Judge) Nan/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge