HIGHCOURtOFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR Division Bench Coram : Hon'ble Shri Jagdish Bhalta, Acting C.J. & t-lon'ble Shri Dilip RaosahebDeshmukh, J. Writ ADpeai (P.R.) No.2194 of 2007 Apftellants Petitioners ...:^/1^'.;., l!;.—-u-—-' ' Respondents versus 1. .-^- .^' IU 1. . Milind Gupta, sprT~of Dr. Vijay Singh Gupta, aged about 30 years 2. - Skandli Gupta, son of Dr. Vijay Singh^ Gypta, aged about 28 years. 3. Dr. Vijay Singh Gupta, son of late Bahadur Singh, aged about 66 years All are residents of Kutchehri Road, Apapura, Durg: District- Durg(CG) Ajit Singh Gupta, son of tate Bahadur Singh Gupta, aged about 71 years, resident of Kutehehri Road, Apapura, Durg, District-Durg (CG) 2. Ajay Singh Gupta, son of late Bahadur Singh Gupta, aged aboyt 64 y6ars,resident of Irani Dera Utai Road, Durg, District- Durg(CG) MemdofWritADDealuhderSeetion2(iyoftheChhattisflarhHiah CourttADDeal to Division Bench) Act. 2006. , Present : Shri Sunil Sahu, counsel for the appellants/petitioners. ~?" ORAL ORDER (Passed on 5th of July, 2007) The following oral order of the Court was passed by Jagdish Bhatla, Acting ChiefJustice : This appeal has arisen from the order d9ted06.02.2007 passed byHon'bleSingleJudgeinWritPetition(CONo-.166of2007fil8dunder Article 227 oftheConstitutionoflndia. ^ <L- Learned eounsel for the appellants concedes that Section 2 of the Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006 clearly provides that no appeal shall lie against an interlocutoryorder or against an order passed in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 ofthe Constitution of India. In the light of above, no interference is warranted by this Court. The appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. Acting^Chief^usiace , Ollie'<ju^ s Sopal ^:y ^ ^