vl'|. :-~-:..i7{^. y?. ^,s ^sy^ s^? ^ u IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. fSlNO. ^)0 /2011 PETITIONER ^ . • ^ ^ RESPONDENTS ..>'^ ^F\n ^•""^^"\^ ^•••'" ^'r.. ^^" ^ s^ Pulin Mandal, S/o Sheetal Mandal, aged about 42 years, Assistant Teacher, Balak Ashram Orcha, District Narayanpur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. ' State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Backward Class Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2.<^ The Commissioner, Tribal Development, Raipur (C.G.) 3.-^ The Secretary, Mata Rukhmani Seva Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tahsil an District Jagdalpur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICB PRITWKBR DIWAKBR PETITIONER RBSPONDBNTs W.P.CSi.NO. 7710/2011 Pulin Mandal Versus State of Chhattisgarh 85 Others Shri Rahul Mishra, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, P.L. fortheState. WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (16.12.2011) With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the inatter is heard finally. Contenfion of the counsel for the petitioner is that iiumber of identical petitions have been decided by this Courtan.ci one such case is W.P. No. 4108/2005 (Smt. A.Lall Vs. State of C,G. 8s Othersj.He submits that his case 1s squarely covered with the abovementioned case and therefore at this stage he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file representation before respondent No.l. He however submits that direction may be issued for deciding his representation expeditiously. Counsel for the State submits that at this stage he cannot make any statement as to whether the case of the petitioner is covered with the order passed in aforementioned writ petition as relied upon by the petitioner. He further submits that if the petitioner will make a representation the same would be decided in accordance with law after scrutinizing the factual and legal position of the case. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. In the eventuality of filing any such representation by the petitioner within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, it is expected that the same would be decided within a further period oftwo months. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits ofthecase and the respondent No.3 would be at liberty to decide the representation strictly in accordance with law. | I Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge