APPP. 670-10 - 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 670 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 182 OF 2010 Dilip Kanal & Anr. ... Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondents Mr. A. H. H. Ponda, for the Applicants. None for the Respondent State. Mr. A. P. Mundargi, Sr. Counsel a/w C. K. Pendse, Faisal Sayyed & Mayur Bhojwani i/b M/s. M. K. Ambalal, for Respondent No.2. CORAM: V. M. KANADE J. DATE : MAY 5, 2011 P.C. 1. A precipe is moved by respondent No. 2 for ‘Speaking to the Minutes’ of the order dated 27th April, 2011. It is submitted that in paragraph 2 while recording submissions of the applicant, it is stated as under- “It is the case of the complainant that personal guarantee has been given as a guarantor.” It is submitted that instead of work ‘complainant’, the word ‘applicants’ may be substituted. 2. Secondly, it is submitted that while extending the period in paragraph 5, it is stated in line No. 5 from the bottom, it is stated that- APPP. 670-10 - 2 - “ ... the accused and his family members will have to be relieved from the said undertaking after a period of 8 weeks from today.” It is submitted that said period was extended upto 30th June, 2011. 3. The counsel for the applicants has no objection if the above two modifications are made. Hence, in paragraph 2 in the above referred sentence the word ‘complainant’ is substituted by the word ‘applicants’. So also in paragraph 5, in the above referred sentence the words “after a period of 8 weeks from today’ is substituted by words ‘from 30th June, 2011’. The said sentence now will read as under “ ... the accused and his family members will have to be relieved from the said undertaking from 30th June, 2011.” . Order is accordingly, modified. [ V. M. KANADE J.]