WP(C) 2244/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA. Heard Mr. A. Matin, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B .K. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Social Welfare Department. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the appoin tment of the Respondent No.7 as Anganwadi Worker in the centre called 470 No. Ku warichuk Anganwadi Centre. As per own showing of the petitioner that in the sele ction, she had secured 56 marks as against 62.2 percent secured by the Responden t No.7. According to the petitioner, she being H.S.S.L.C. examination passed and the Respondent No.7 only being H.S.L.C. examination passed, she should have bee n given more marks. The minimum qualification required for appointment of Anganwadi Worker i s H.S.L.C. examination passed, which the Respondent No.7 conforms. Depending upo n the marks secured under different heads, the said respondent having secured 62 .2% marks, she stood first in the selection. There is another candidate, who st ood second by securing 59.6% marks. The position of the petitioner is third hav ing secured 56. In view of the above, no direction can be issued to the respondents to a ppoint the petitioner as Anganwadi Worker as a selected candidate. Writ petition is dismissed.