IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44791 of 2010 LAXMAN RAVIDAS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 18.01.2011 The matter has come up at the instance of the petitioner for modification of the last portion of the order dated 22.12.2010 where it has been recorded S.D.J.M., Gaya instead of S.D.J.M. Sherghati at Gaya. This fact perpetuated in the order since it was wrongly recorded by the petitioner in the prayer portion of the petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion. Let the second last line of the order dated 22.12.2010 be read as ‘to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Sherghati at Gaya’. Let the present order and the order dated 22.12.2010 be sent to the S.D.J.M., Sherghati at Gaya through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. The order dated 22.12.2010 accordingly stands modified. Fahad. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. )