IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 15TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 25586 of 2005(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ SHEEBA V.N., SHEEBA SADAN, KANNETTUMUKKU, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-14. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR SRI.K.P.SUDHEER RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE DISTRICT OFFICER, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. M.P. SREEKRISHNAN. BY ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS,SC,KPSC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC. 25586/2005. APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT. P1 : TRUE EXTRACT OF LIST PUBLISHED BY PSC IN RESPECT OF THE SELECTION TO THE POST OF LPSA/UPSA (MALAYALAM) IN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No.25586 of 2005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of February, 2008 JUDGMENT Prayers in the writ petition are for a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to report all the vacancies of LPSA/UPSA arising in Government Schools and Panchayat Schools in Thiruvananthapuram District to the Public Service Commission before 16.9.2005 and to direct respondents 3 and 4 to take effective steps for maintaining the proportion in communal reservation in accordance with law and to advise candidates proportionately from the list of Latin Catholics with that of other OBCs. 2. I heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Service Commission. 3. In the counter affidavit it is stated inter alia that 53 vacancies were reported. Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vacancies were remaining to be advised and only 30 were advised. But this was countered by the learned counsel for the Public Service Commission by pointing out that after advising 30 candidates, the main list expired and in the light of the declaration of the law by the Apex Court no further advise can be made from the existing list. In the light of this stand, no relief can be granted to the petitioner. WPC.25586/2005. 2 Accordingly, the writ petition fails and it is dismissed. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb