IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No. 3095 of 2008 Date of Decision: 30.7.2009 Kusum and others ....Appellants. Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Ashish Sharma, DAG, Haryana, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Raghujeet Singh Madan, Advocate, for respondent No.3. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. This order shall dispose of two appeals bearing RFA No. 3095 and 3096 of 2008 as the same have arisen from the same award and relate to the same acquisition. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that against the same acquisition, some of the other claimants had also approached this Court for further enhancement of the compensation and the matter has already been remanded to the reference court vide order dated 5.12.2008 passed in RFA No.361 of 2007 (Jiwan Dass v. State of Haryana and another) for fresh consideration of the material placed on record by the parties. The present appeals have been filed by the claimants for enhancement of the amount of compensation awarded by RFA No. 3095 of 2008 -2- the reference court vide the same award. The parties are not at variance on the factual concept of the matter that the material on record of the present case had not been noticed by the reference court while passing the impugned award. In view thereof, the award is, therefore, set aside and the matter is remanded to the reference court for deciding the same afresh in terms of the order dated 5.12.2008 passed by this Court in RFA No. 361 of 2007 (Jiwan Dass v. State of Haryana and another) and other connected appeals. The appeals are disposed of accordingly. July 30, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No. 3096 of 2008 Date of Decision: 30.7.2009 Kirpal Singh ....Appellant. Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Ashish Sharma, DAG, Haryana, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Raghujeet Singh Madan, Advocate, for respondent No.3. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. This appeal is disposed of, remanding the matter to the reference court for deciding the same afresh. For reasons, see the judgment of even date recorded in RFA No. 3095 of 2008 (Kusum and others v. State of Haryana and others). July 30, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE