IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5784 of 1991 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? ------------------------------------------------------------ -- BHOLABHAI ISHWARBHAI JOSHI Versus PANDIT SUKHLALJI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 5784 of 1991 MR BG JANI for Petitioner No. 1 MS HANSA B PUNANI for Respondent No. 1 MR YOGESH S LAKHANI for Respondent No. 1 MR ND GOHIL for Respondent No. 2-3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI Date of decision: 04/07/2003 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Mr. Devnani for Mr. Y.S. Lakhani, learned advocate for respondent no.1 has placed on record the communication dated 2-7-2003 along with letter dated 4-11-1993 and the muster roll received from respondent No.1. After having gone through the above referred documents produced by Mr. Devnani, it is stated by Mr. B.G. Jani, learned advocate for the petitioner that, he has no instruction in this regard. 2. There is no reason to doubt the papers as above produced by Mr. Devnani and the petition appears to have become infructuous. For the above reasons the petition is dismissed as infructuous. Ad-interim relief granted earlier stands vacated. Rule discharged. No costs. Dt: 4-7-2003 ( N.G. Nandi, J ) /vgn