IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO. 647 OF 2007 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 22.11.2006 in WP No. 26285 of 2005 on the file of the High Court.) Between: M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep. By its Chairman and Managing Director, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad – 4 and another ..... APPELLANT AND Guntapalli Krishna Rao and others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : ORAL JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) This writ appeal is filed by the Singareni Collieries Company Limited – Respondent in Writ Petition No. 26285 of 2005 aggrieved by the order dated 22.11.2006 passed by a learned Single Judge directing the appellant Company to consider the case of the writ petitioner –second respondent herein for payment of monthly monetary compensation in terms of the circular guidelines in lieu of compassionate appointment consequent upon the termination of first respondent - employee on medical grounds and further directed the appellant company to settle the retiral benefits payable to him pursuant to such termination who was declared medically unfit. When this writ appeal is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel for the appellants submitted that a cheque bearing No. 927190 dated 12.12.2009 drawn on State Bank of Hyderabad, Amrutah Hiils, Panjagutta, Hyderabad, for an amount of Rs.3,18,000/- (Rupees Three lakhs eighteen thousands only) drawn in favour of the second respondent towards the monthly monetary compensation, to which the respondents are entitled to, in full and final settlement, had been passed on to the respondents, as the second respondent had attained 60 years, the age of superannuaiton. Recording the said submission, the Writ Appeal is closed. However, the issues, which have been raised by the appellant Company are left open to be decided in an appropriate case. No order as to costs. ____________________ Justice T.Meena Kumari __________________ Justice Sanjay Kumar December 15, 2009 MAS.