IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3573 of 2007 LALAN KUMAR SINGH, S/O BHARAT PRASAD SINGH, R/O VILLAGE+POST OFFICE-SUKKI, VIA-KHAJAULI, POLICE STATION-KHAJAULI, DISTRICT-MADHUBANI. ……………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD, PATNA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MADHUBANI. 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, DISTRICT-MADHUBANI. 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KHAJAULI, DISTRICT-MADHUBANI. 6. THE SUKKI GRAM PANCHAYAT, BLOCK-KHAJAULI, DISTRICT-MADHUBANI THROUGH ITS SECRETARY. 7. MR. VIDYANAND SINGH, S/O SUKHDEV SINGH, EX MUKHIYA OF SUKKI GRAM PANCHAYAT OF KHAJAULI BLOCK DISTRICT-MADHUBANI, R/O VILLAGE+P.O.-SUKKI VIA, KHAJAULI, P.S.- KHAJAULI, DISTRICT-MADHUBANI. 8. MR. BANSHI MISHRA, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, EX-PANCHAYAT SECRETARY OF SUKKI GRAM PANCHAYAT OF KHAJAULI BLOCK DISTRICT-MADHUBANI, R/O VILLAGE+P.O.-SUKKI VIA, KHAJAULI, P.S.-KHAJAULI, DISTRICT- MADHUBANI. 9. MR. UMESH SHAFI, S/O GHOGAN SHAFI, MUKHIYA OF SUKKI GRAM PANCHAYAT OF KHAJAULI BLOCK DISTRICT-MADHUBANI, R/O VILLAGE+P.O.-SUKKI VIA, KHAJAULI, P.S.-KHAJAULI, DISTRICT- MADHUBANI. 10. GANESHI MARHA, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PANCHAYAT SECRETARY OF SUKKI GRAM PANCHAYAT OF KHAJAULI BLOCK DISTRICT- MADHUBANI, R/O VILLAGE+P.O.-SUKKI VIA, KHAJAULI, P.S.-KHAJAULI, DISTRICT- MADHUBANI. 11. MR. DHAYANI SINGH, S/O BANGALI SINGH, R/O VILLAGE+P.O.-SUKKI VIA, KHAJAULI, P.S.- KHAJAULI, DISTRICT-MADHUBANI. ……………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 25.11.2009 This writ application was filed for 2 challenging the appointment of respondent no. 11 as Shiksha Mitra. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now the certificates of respondent no. 11 have already been cancelled by the Board. Therefore, he may be allowed to move the Appellate Authority for consideration of his case for appointment as they submit that now the Appellate Authorities constituted by the State Government under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Prarambhik Shikshak (Niyojan Avam Seva Sart) Niyamvali, 2006 (as amended by Amendment Act, 2008) are functional and are now efficacious alternative forums available to the petitioner and other for consideration of their grievances. In view of the submissions of the learned counsels and in view of the availability of the efficacious alternative forum for consideration of matters relating to employment of Shiksha Mitra/Panchayat Shikshak, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the concerned Appellate Authority, if not already filed, for redressal of his grievance. In case such an application is filed by the petitioner, 3 the Appellate Authority shall consider the same and all documents enclosed including orders of this Court in identical matters, if produced therewith and make all endeavours to dispose of the same on its own merits after hearing the parties concerned by a speaking order preferably within the time prescribed under the Rules for the purpose without going into the question of limitation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioner. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)