IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-28205 of 2011 Date of decision:- 14.11.2011 Ajju and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI Present: Mr. Rajender Sorout, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Shalini Attri, D.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Ashok Kaushik, Advocate for the complainant. M.M.S. Bedi, J.(Oral) The petitioners as a members of unlawful assembly armed with iron rods had allegedly inflicted injury on the hand of Sandeep. In routine, the petitioner could have been granted the concession of pre-arrest bail. In view of the fact that after commission of alleged offence in the present case, the petitioners have again committed the similar offence of assault and they have been arrested in FIR No.838 of 13.08.2011 at Police Station, Central Faridabad. For the said reasons, application for pre-arrest bail cannot be allowed, therefore, the same is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to seek concession of regular bail in accordance with law. 14.11. 2011 (M.M.S. BEDI) Jyoti 1 JUDGE