HON’BLE SHRI G.S. SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI Writ Petition No. 23303 of 2006 Between: Andhra Pradesh Marine Fishermen’s Protection Committee, Rep. by its President V.Chittibabu, Mulapet, Nellore. … Petitioner and The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Chief Secretary, Hyderabad & others ... Respondents :: O R D E R :: Counsel for the petitioner : None 29th October, 2007 Per G. S. Singhvi, CJ In this petition, the petitioner has made the following substantive prayer: “ It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the inaction of the official respondents 2 to 5 in taking action against 6th and 7th respondents on the complaints made by the petitioner and victims into the brutal incident of attacking, looting, destructing, fining, ex-communicating and attempting on the life of 13 fishermen namely 1. Pralaya Kaveri Ramulu S/o Chinnaiah (35 years), 2. Chinni Ramalingaiah, S/o Pitchaiah (43 years), 3. Kuninagari Subramanyam, S/o Chinna Subbaiah (40 years), 4. Chinna Pothaiah, S/o Ramalingaiah (30 years), 5. Konduru Seenaiah, S/o Yanadaiah (26 years), 6. Buchimgari yedukondalu, S/o Govindaiah (25 years), 7. Kunasi Mangamma, W/o Kondaiah (45 years), 8. Komari Munaiah, S/o Venkateswarlu (27 years), 9. Komari Venkateswarlu, S/o Atchaiah (52 years), 10. Komari Rosaiah, S/o For all the facts and circumstances stated above, I pray that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents as illegal, arbitrary, violative of the petitioner’s legal and fundamental rights, and consequently direct the respondents to open the lock of flat No.125 Jamuna Towers, Malakpet, Hyderabad and to hand over the furniture, court files, type writer, CPU with colour monitor and the advocates uniform and all other stating and belongings under petitioner’s acknowledgment at his flat no.125, Jamuna Towers, Malakpet, Hyderabad and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” Since no one has appeared for the petitioner, it is reasonable to presume that it is not interested in pursuing its cause. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed in default. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition in default, W.P.M.P.Nos. 29678 and 29679 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for interim relief are also dismissed. G.S. SINGHVI, CJ G. ROHINI, J Date: 29.10.2007 ksld