IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48826 of 2008 Uma Kant Pandey, son of Sri Satya Narayan Pandey, Resident of village- Raghunathpur, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur ….. Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar ….. Opp. Party ----------- 02 16.02.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is the Public Distribution System, dealer. Allegation against him is that, at the time of inspection by the B.D.O., the shop was closed, petitioner was absent, as such inquiry could not be done on account of non-production of stock register, distribution register, cash memo and other documents. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the B.D.O. was not authorized to make any inspection or inquiry. It is also stated that the Mukhiya and other concerned authorities have certified that the shop of the petitioner used to remain open at the relevant time. Considering these facts, prayer on behalf of petitioner, namely, Uma Kant Pandey, for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, the petitioner are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, West, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 121 of 2006, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. P.K. (Mridula Mishra, J.)