IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 10554 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- ARVINDBHAI MANILAL PATEL Versus SS RAVAL AUTHORISED OFFICER & CO OP OFFICER -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 10554 of 1998 MR MUKESH R SHAH for Petitioner No. 1-4 MR SOMPURA, Ld. AGP for Respondent No. 1 MR PK JANI for Respondent No. 1 MR KS JHAVERI for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL Date of decision: 03/10/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr.K.S.Jhaveri, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 Market Committee, states that the election of the market committee is over and the term of the market committee is also over and, therefore, the petition has become infructuous. He states that he has conveyed to Mr.Shah, learned Counsel for the petitioners. In view of this, the petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule discharged. 3-10-2002 (Jayant Patel, J.) vinod