IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35562 of 2010 SHIV PUJAN MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----- 03. 24.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. F.I.R. is to the effect that deceased was done to death for non-providing of a motorcycle in demand, missing torture, but other family members including father and wife of the informant appeared in course of investigation to state that torture was also there. In supervision, story of suffering of the deceased from jaundice after re-examining of the family members of the deceased, beside other persons finds no corroboration by medical evidence as jaundice has not been opined the reason for death. Viscera is kept preserved goes to show that death was not natural one and petitioner is father-in-law not entitled for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of petitioner for anticipatory bail stands rejected. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)