IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 2ND NOVEMBER 2009 / 11TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 16591 of 2009(T) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- K.P.SULEKHA,AGED 44 YEARS,W/O.USMAN, 'BAITTUL AJAB',PATTAR VAYAL,CHOKLI POST, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.C.R.SIVAKUMAR. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REP.BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY,SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY,DEPARTMENT OF LAND REVENUE THRISSUR. 3. THE SECRETARY,DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,COLLECTORATE KANNUR. 5. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR,OFFICE OF LAND ACQUISITION,THALASSERY. 6. THE SECRETARY,CHOKLI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, CHOKLI,KANNUR DISTRICT. 7. THE CHOKLI GRAMA PANCHAYATH,REP.BY ITS SECRETARY,PANCHAYATH OFFICE CHOCKLI. 8. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,VILLAGE OFFICE, CHOKLI VILLAGE. R1 TO R5 & R8 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR. V. MANU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/11/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.16591/2009-T: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE SALE DEED DTD. 18/06/05. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE ROUGH SKETCH IN SY.NO.85/4. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION LETTER DTD. 19/05/09. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DTD. 30/07/01. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE INTIMATION LETTER DTD. 03/06/05. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.16591 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT The application of the petitioner for building permit was not finally decided on ground that the land in question was required for a proposed bus stand complex. The petitioner relies on Ext.P5 to show that such proposal no more survives. Whatever be the reason, the 6th respondent shall pass final orders on Ext.P3, in accordance with law, within one month. All other issues on merits are left open. If the decision is against the interest of the petitioner, the reasons thereof shall also be stated so that the petitioner would be entitled to seek statutory remedies from other jurisdiction. This writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.3/11.