^ ^l IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) ^@ g, Second Appeal No. ^t? ^ 72005 u^w^s ^ APPELLANTS / Plaintiffs ^9} 1. Laxmi Narayan, aged 33 Years, S/o Bali Ram Dhemar 2,- Laxmi Bai, aged 58 years, / wd/o Bali Ram Dhemar, Both R/o Salhevarpara, Dhamtari Tahsil & Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) ^y <^- ^" RESPQ^ND^ENTS Defendants /j ^3-^2 :G;^^oa 3 VERSUS Kartikram, aged 63 years S/o Pituram Gond, R/o Danitola Dhamtari Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) Aasi Bai aged 50 years, Wd/o Kanhaiyalal Sethia 3. Mulchand aged about 32 years, S/o Kanhaiyalal Sethia 4. Dara aged about 30 years, S/o Kanhaiyalal Sethia 5, Madan aged 28 years /' S/o Kanhaiyalal Sethia 6, Mohan aged about 26 years S/o Kanhaiyalal Sethia 7. Inder aged about 24 years S/o Kanhaiyalal Sethia 8. Motilat aged 22 years S/o Kanhaiyalal Sethia (2) 9. Manoj aged 20 years / S/o Kanhaiyalal Sethia All R/o of Sadar Bazar, Dhamtari Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) 10, Revenue Inspector R.I.Circle Dhamtari (C.G.) •11. Tahsildar Tahsil Dhamtari Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) 12. State of C.G. Through Collector Dhamtari (C.G.) ^'_ SECOND APPEALU/S.'IOO OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE r ^, XI-HC-22 3^?T^T R^i<=b3TT^T ^TW^cT »•^^ .^ Y '^^ 3:ST ^I^K-I^, ^Tfi<141(o, R<^11^^< 3TT^T ^IIHC^I Sh^lcb^.fi..-:.^..^ fd^ ^ 200 3T1^T ^RTTW ^N 29,082006 1A No 2724/2006 Shri b.N. Prajapoti, Counjsel for the appellants. Heord. Thjs is an opplicQtion for <=hl^fd41-l W^ff^te1^"<^^l< ^3Tf^T3TT^T withdrowal of the oppeal Lfiomed counsel for the |3ppellantfi aibmits that fiince th& relief, which was cfaim&d by ^he appellants ho<s alr&ady b&en fulfilled, the appelbnts do nojt want to prosecute thijg Qppeal This flpplication for wi|+idrttw<3l is supporhad with an offjdovit of Laywt Nflrayan^ wk^) is orroyed as <ypticont NoA. The application te allowe<|. Second Appesal No.46pp./2(X)5 stonds dismissed as withdrflwn. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge (<^^f^)