XI—HC-22/ , m W:wm‘"'WI‘P".‘"‘1‘0"7972®§ 260 ma mm -' ' mmuaiwm sxw $3TF-atrm W \ 692001: Shrl K A.Ansar1 for the petltionerg Shrl Gautam Bhadu J. for the respondents. Heard .i r Thé petitioner is aggrievedjoy the order of termihationi‘ofrher. se‘r’vic ras’Urdu'Teacher at Barela rPrifmary’School byvorder d .- 20,6.200l. It may be stated ‘ e that the petitioner was a péinted in 1996’ for one academic " seesion as Urdu Teacher of om July 1996 to 30.4.97. On completiorx of single sess omemployment she was given‘ another academic year's a pointment for the academic session‘1997-98‘. Thereaft r; byran order issued on 18.3.99 the pe‘titioher and’severa other'persons were given appoint— ‘ e ment as Shiksh‘a'xarmLin he scale of pay of Rs. 800 — 20 - 1200 per‘ monthuln the:’sa d order the name of the writ petitioner appeared at S. 0.83. She was given regular appointment as Urdu Teach r at the said school. Thereafter, the impugned order of ter ination came to be issued by the .R Chief Executive Officer , anpad Panchayat,Munge1i on 20.6¢200\ terminating the services f the writ petitioner on the ground that when she was initial y employed as Shiksha Karmi ( as Urdu Teacher ) for s ngle session in the year 1996—97 i she Q x r‘ did not have the req isite qualification. it is contende¢ ' ..... [dew , W W W in service without any bf 4 is entitled to—receive ba eke. Accordingly she v W Ckwag/e§g[3——‘ 4 A ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ . \, 745..“ \ Sdl- Chief Justice XI-HCv22' W m m lag: .m m 200 ma aTr§¥rat7r mwewm Waném WWHfé‘d ' '3 ' ‘ mimm afa ammm with and she shall be treated to have continued