... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1239 OF 2005 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER STAMP NO.24911 OF 2005 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri A.R. Patil, A.G.P.for the State. Shri S.S. Kanetkar h/f Shri G.S.Godbole for the Respondent No.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 20, 2006. : JUNE 20, 2006. : JUNE 20, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard counsel appearing for the parties. Perused the pleading including reply affidavit filed by the Respondent tendered across the bar. For the reasons mentioned in the Application, in my opinion sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay of 105 days as computed by the office in filing the Appeal. As the delay is essentially on account of procedural lapses as noted in the Application, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE