FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPEALATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2002 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders. of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Amit Date i/by S.V.Sadavarte for the Applicants. Mr.Rajesh More, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 09th July,2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is an application for leave to file appeal. By the impugned order the complaint was dismissed for default. On perusal of the roznama, it is clear that the complaint is of the year 2001. The roznama indicates that on 13.12.2006 the complainant was absent but the advocate was present, the matter was adjourned to 2.2.2007 as a matter of last chance. On 2.2.2007 both Advocate and the complainant were absent and the matter was adjourned to 24.10.2007. Thereafter on 24.10.2007 the Advocate and the complainant were absent and the matter was adjourned to 20.11.2007. On 20.11.2007 both were absent and the matter was adjourned to 28.12.2007. On 28.12.2007 the complainant was absent though his advocate was present and the matter was adjourned to 30.1.2008. On 30.1.2008 both complainant and advocate were absent and the matter was adjourned to 27.4.2008. On that day both were absent when the complaint was dismissed. The roznama indicates that from 2.2.2007 i.e. for more than one year the complainant and his advocates were absent. In the circumstances, the order cannot be faulted. Hence, the application is dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPEALATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2003 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders. of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Amit Date i/by S.V.Sadavarte for the Applicants. Mrs. M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 09th July,2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is an application for leave to file appeal. By the impugned order the complaint was dismissed for default. On perusal of the roznama, it is clear that the complaint is of the year 2001. The roznama indicates that on 13.12.2006 the complainant was absent but the advocate was present, the matter was adjourned to 2.2.2007 as a matter of last chance. On 2.2.2007 both Advocate and the complainant were absent and the matter was adjourned to 24.10.2007. Thereafter on 24.10.2007 the Advocate and the complainant were absent and the matter was adjourned to 20.11.2007. On 20.11.2007 both were absent and the matter was adjourned to 28.12.2007. On 28.12.2007 the complainant was absent though his advocate was present and the matter was adjourned to 30.1.2008. On :4: 30.1.2008 both complainant and advocate were absent and the matter was adjourned to 27.4.2008. On that day both were absent when the complaint was dismissed. The roznama indicates that from 2.2.2007 i.e. for more than one year the complainant and his advocates were absent. In the circumstances, the order cannot be faulted. Hence, the application is dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) :5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPEALATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2004 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders. of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Amit Date i/by S.V.Sadavarte for the Applicants. Mrs. A.S.More, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 09th July,2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is an application for leave to file appeal. By the impugned order the complaint was dismissed for default. On perusal of the roznama, it is clear that the complaint is of the year 2001. The roznama indicates that on 13.12.2006 the complainant was absent but the advocate was present, the matter was adjourned to 2.2.2007 as a matter of last chance. On 2.2.2007 both Advocate and the complainant were absent and the matter was adjourned to 24.10.2007. Thereafter on 24.10.2007 the Advocate and the complainant were absent and the matter was adjourned to 20.11.2007. On 20.11.2007 both were absent and the matter was adjourned to 28.12.2007. On 28.12.2007 the complainant was absent though his advocate was present and the :6: matter was adjourned to 30.1.2008. On 30.1.2008 both complainant and advocate were absent and the matter was adjourned to 27.4.2008. On that day both were absent when the complaint was dismissed. The roznama indicates that from 2.2.2007 i.e. for more than one year the complainant and his advocates were absent. In the circumstances, the order cannot be faulted. Hence, the application is dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) :7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPEALATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2005 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders. of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Amit Date i/by S.V.Sadavarte for the Applicants. Mrs. R.M. Gadhavi,A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 09th July,2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is an application for leave to file appeal. By the impugned order the complaint was dismissed for default. On perusal of the roznama, it is clear that the complaint is of the year 2001. The roznama indicates that on 13.12.2006 the complainant was absent but the advocate was present, the matter was adjourned to 2.2.2007 as a matter of last chance. On 2.2.2007 both Advocate and the complainant were absent and the matter was adjourned to 24.10.2007. Thereafter on 24.10.2007 the Advocate and the complainant were absent and the matter was adjourned to 20.11.2007. On 20.11.2007 both were absent and the matter was adjourned to 28.12.2007. On :8: 28.12.2007 the complainant was absent though his advocate was present and the matter was adjourned to 30.1.2008. On 30.1.2008 both complainant and advocate were absent and the matter was adjourned to 27.4.2008. On that day both were absent when the complaint was dismissed. The roznama indicates that from 2.2.2007 i.e. for more than one year the complainant and his advocates were absent. In the circumstances, the order cannot be faulted. Hence, the application is dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.)