Civil Revision No.4561 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No.4561 of 2010 Date of Decision: 13.8.2010 Surinder Tamna …Petitioner Versus Satpal …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. N.S. Rapri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Chauhan, Advocate for the respondent. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner/landlord submits that ejectment petition under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, was filed by the petitioner/landlord, who is a Non Resident Indian, on the ground of personal necessity. He further submits that grave error has been committed by the Rent Controller, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar, by granting leave to contest the ejectment petition in favour of the respondent/tenant. Learned counsel for the respondent/tenant has submitted that the discretion has been validly exercised by the Rent Controller and the Revisional Court ought to be hesitant to substitute its opinion, in case the opinion formulated by the Rent Controller, on the facts of the case, is justifiable. Civil Revision No.4561 of 2010 2 At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner/landlord submits that in case the eviction petition is decided within a stipulated period, by affording three effective opportunities for leading evidence to both the parties, he will not press the present revision petition. Learned counsel for the respondent/petitioner has no objection to the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner/tenant. Accordingly, the present revision petition is disposed of by directing the Rent Controller to decide the eviction petition, within a period of six months, from the next date of hearing, fixed by the trial Court, by affording three equal opportunities to both the parties to lead their evidence. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge August 13, 2010 “DK”