1 ao915-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 915 OF 2010 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. OF 2010 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1124 OF 2010 Smt. Jayshree S. Parekh .. Appellant v/s. Smt. Dhanlaxmi J. Shah & Ors. .. Respondents .... Mr. S. M. Gorwadkar for the Appellant. Mr. A. R. Pande for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Ms. Geeta Joglekar for Respondent No.3. .... CORAM : J. H. BHATIA, J. DATE : OCTOBER 18, 2010. P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. According to the Appellant she is the landlady. The Plaintiffs / Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are the tenants. Respondents filed Suit No. 1481 of 2010 against Respondent No. 3, the Municipal Corporation, seeking to challenge the notice issued under Section 354 A of the Municipal Corporation Act, without impleading the landlady as a party and 2 ao915-10 obtained ad- interim order of status quo on 22nd June, 2010. This order is challenged in the present Appeal. 3. Now, it is admitted that recently Chamber Summons taken out by the present Appellant has been allowed and she is impleaded as a party in the suit; and thus, she gets the right to contest the Notice of Motion. In view of these circumstances, in my opinion, following directions will meet the ends of justice :- i. The appellant shall be allowed to file reply to the Notice of Motion as well as written statement in the suit. ii. The trial Court shall expedite the hearing and dispose of the Notice of Motion as early as possible, and preferably within eight weeks from the receipt of this order. 4. Appeal and Civil Application are disposed of accordingly. [ J. H. BHATIA, J. ]