THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3436 OF 2011 18.11.2011 Between: Saladi Suryanarayana …Petitioner AND Saladi Seethayya …Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3436 OF 2011 ORDER: The petitioner is plaintiff in O.S.No.193 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kothapeta, in East Godavari District. The suit was instituted for specific performance of agreement of sale dated 05.12.1996 and also for alternative relief of refund of advance amount paid with interest. In the said suit, the petitioner filed I.A.No.360 of 2011 under Order VII Rule 1(3) and Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) praying the lower Court to grant leave to the petitioner to file seven documents as mentioned in the petition. The application was opposed. The trial Court dismissed the application holding that those documents are not relevant for the purpose of disposal of the suit. Aggrieved by the order, the civil revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the petitioner would rely on the decision of this Court in M.Nagabhushanam v V.Suresh Kumar[1] and would contend that the question of relevancy cannot be gone into at the time of receiving the documents. The counsel for respondents opposed the civil revision petition. There is no dispute that the suit is filed for specific performance of agreement of sale dated 05.12.1996. The documents which are sought to be marked are in connection with some other property which the petitioner allegedly purchased jointly with the respondent and others. Therefore, these documents as held by the lower Court cannot be relevant. Further, if the documents are relevant, the petitioner can always mark them in the cross-examination by confronting the witnesses with those documents. In that view of the matter, this Court does not find any grave error apparent on the face of record. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 18.11.2011 Pln [1] 2010 (11) AP 550 (Lawyers Choice)