IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2020 of 2009 BHUWAN BHUSHAN BHARTIYA SON OF LATE SIDDESHWAR PRASAD RESIDENT OF MOHALLA SLUM-132 KANKARBBAGH, COLONY, PATNA-20 P.S. KANKARBAGH, DISTRICT PATNA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR SECRETARY MR. DIPAK KUMAR, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. MR. K. SANTHIL, COMMISSIONER-CUM-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BUDHA MARG, PATNA. 3. MR. RAM SANKAR JHA, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM THE CHIEF ACCOUNT OFFICER, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BUDHA MARG, PATNA. ----------- 3. 10.2.2010. N.H./ In view of the statement and the calculation, which is the payment made to the petitioner contained in Annexure-A, the contempt application now stands disposed of and learned counsel representing the petitioner states that he has been informed that he has not been paid a sum of Rs.13,000/- and odd, which is entitled to. This being disputed by the counsel for the Corporation. If the petitioner can demonstrate from the accounts that the D.A. component has not been included, he may claim the same and the respondents will give a satisfactory answer to him. The contempt application is dismissed. ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.) - 2 -