IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 27TH JUNE 2008 / 6TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 24869 of 2005(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- K.SAVITHRI, "RATHI" HOUSE, PALAKKADA ROAD, PUTHIYANGADI P.O., KOZHIKODE-26. BY ADV. SRI.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR (PANAMPALLI NAGAR) SRI.T.A.RAJAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(GENERAL), KOZHIKODE. 2. VELOM PANCHAYATH SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., CHERUPURAM P.O., KAKKATTIL, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.NOBLE MATHEW FOR R1. ADV. SRI.V.KRISHNA MENON FOR R2 SMT.P.VIJAYAMMA FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- Ext.P1: Copy of the mutually agreed settlement dtd.13.5.1996 entered between the second respondent and the petitioner. Ext.P2: Copy of the judgment dtd.5.4.2002 in OP.No.11655/01 passed by this Hon'ble Court. Ext.P3: Copy of the representation dtd.3.9.2002 submitted by the petitioner to the first respondent. Ext.P4: Copy of the order No.AEL/2276/01/LDis. Dtd.14.2.2003 of the first respondent. Ext.P5: Copy of the order bearing No.G.O.(Rt.)No.497/2004/ Co-op dated 8.9.2004. Ext.P6: Copy of the representation dtd.25.2.2004 submitted by the petitioner to the first respondent. Ext.P7: Copy of the statement for the period from 1.12.74 to 19.3.84. Ext.P8: Copy of the order No.CRP(2) 1379/04 dtd.13.5.2005 issued by the first respondent. Ext.P9: Copy of the judgment dtd.11.2.2005 in WP(C).No. 26224/03(V) passed by this Hon'ble Court. Ext.P10: Copy of the order No.PB/W.P/No.26244/03. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL. ( TRUE COPY ) PS TO JUDGE. kvs/- KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.24869 of 2005 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT In the matter of difference in pay Ext.P6 representation filed by the petitioner was rejected. According to the petitioner the reasons stated for the rejection is not correct and moreover the same is passed without notice to the petitioner also. There is no counter affidavit. I quash Ext.P8. There will be a direction to the first respondent to consider Ext.P6 afresh with notice to the petitioner and the second respondent and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law adverting to the contentions taken by the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) ahg. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------- W.P(C).No.24869 of 2005 ----------------------------------- JUDGMENT 27th June, 2008