c - r?--1<3 ^ %°^', .?-:'yTA...' v°^^- -....- -,-5-^-T^^'" •¥"1^<~s \5>"" .c-a't1" /•'** ^w ^^ taRsos BEiPEHDffl^S Waaii^aai ^o about 27 yeai-s, RjRt ^fflage •^- ^itKaf, -TaKSal KtBtuAt ^ttetrijCt Q m (L^- OQi^F^ETEK The pefifioaer aaost liuanb^? amd respectfeiBy t»e^to pE»n< As stated in cause -ti8e AsstatedalxWE'i&Gatl^Stle. ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (227) No. 988 of2011 PETITIONER : ChampaLal VERSUS RESPOITOENTS : State ofChhattisgarh&another WMT EETmON UNDER ARTICLE 227 QF THE CONSTTTOTION OFINDIA fSB: Hon'Ue Mr. NJC Asarwal.J^ ^Present ; Shn SK Dadsena, Advocatefer the petitkuer. SlmGD'Waswaai.Govt.AdvocatefbrtfaeState. ORAI.GffilDEB (Passeden 21.82.2etl) The mstant petition is directed agamst Ae oider dated Q8.08.2008, passed by Civil Judge Class II, Kwud, Distt. Dhamtm-i in Civil Suit No. 26-A/2008. The order impu^ed is passed on 08.08.2008, wliercas Ae instaat petition has beea filed on 15.02.2011 i.e. aftCT delay of about2.5years. The petitioser has slept over his rights since2008 tifl the filiag ofthis petition. Tlielaehes and delay in ap(woaclung Ais Court hasnot been explamed bythe petitioner. In view of above, the petition deserves to be and is hereby dismissed on Ae ground of delay and lasbes. No order asto costs. Sd//- N.K. Agrawal Judge