ss^' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHArTISGARH ^F BILASPUR (C.G) WRIT PETITION SSo^ 30 S" _/2001 Petitlonexs Janki Prasad Sahu^ S/o Shri Pilabafcu Sahu ^pper Dlvlsion Clerk, Nagar Pallka, Shivri Narayan^ Tahsil and Disfct. Bilaspur (C.G) - Ver^JLs - Respondentss '^^ 1/StatEe of Chhattlsgarh through the Secretary Deparfcment of Urban .Mministration and Develop^ent ^ D^ K^s»Bhawan^ Mantralaya^ Ralpur^ 2, State of Madhya Pradesh through the Secretai'Y Deparfcmerafc. of Urban AcSrainlstration & Develop- raent^ Vallabh Bhawan^ Bhopal^ 3. Nagar Palika, <ailvri Narayan, through its Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Palika Shivrl Narayan Dlstt. Bj.laspur (C.G) 4, K^ar Palika^-ysd^ Dh^nnodh, through it^'funicipal Officer, Dhar^ Distt.Dhar (M.P) WRIT PSTITIpN U^OER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COHSTITUTION OF 1SD1A FOR ISSUANCE OF S^PROPRISSE ^RIT, NRITS, PRDSR,DIRECTION ETC ,,^r' <p^- ^ XI-HC-78 vdT'q'-qiqirt^, U>-al1<1«l<o, RrtW^< ^mc-ff^m^ .(^.:p.;..3.0^, CT^^T<PTR<iro ?CTW^^Trf>Hi|cb 3TT^?T q^^ (^^6|<^) ^2001 g^TWr^Tf^T3TT^^T 18.10.2005 W.P.No.905/2001 Shri Sanajy K* Agrawal, Shri Vivek Sharma, Pan| No. 1. None for respondents N< I.^.No.8833/2005 Thss is an application for Heard Shri Sanjay K. Shri Vivek Sharma, Panel Lawy| thisappiication. Learned counsei for thel has di'ed on 3.3.2002 leaving Deepak Sahu. He further petitioner, di! retiral benel representatives of the petition| In this view of the mati prays forwithdrawal ,of this pe| In support of the afort Deepak Sahu has aiready been This appiication is not o{ <PI^[c5<Tl^ 41!+1C^''^'f^l<)\Fj1'<-CI^ ^3lRiH3H^^T cjounsel for thepetitioner. in^l Lawyer for the State/respondents ^s. 2,3 <& 4. lappropriate order^- A^rawai, counsei for the petitioner and ^r for the State/respondents No, 1 on petitioner submits that the petitioner }iis wife Smt. Suraj Bai Sahu and son slibmits that after the death of the its have been paid to the lega! and no dispute is pending, |"er, learned counsei for the petitioner 'ition having become infructuous* ssaid application, an. affidavit of Shri |:iled. ){^osed by the State counsel< —- icn^r ^•uq -qiqioXI, U>-al<<1<l<», Rte)l<<1^'< ^PT^Tai'TT^ 3TT^$T^rR^icb ^CTOT^^Tg^m? g^lT^R^Rd 3TT^$T — 2^ ^ii^t ^¥ SP/FS/2005-20,000 3n^5Tq^ct?(4c|ij6|^) ^R,200 The same is aiiowedj The petition is per^mitted to be withdrawn, having become infructuous* It stands finalty dispj^sed of as withdrawn. ^ Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge <pi^io<nri ^MoT^'i^^i ^^i>( ^3r(^lT3II^?T