1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 3122 of 2009 Wasu v. State of Maharashtra ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr D.S.Shrimali, Adv for applicant Mr D.P. Thakare, APP for State Coram: A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 29th September 2009 1. Accusations against applicants are serious in nature. Learned counsel for applicant contends that name of applicant did not figure in the FIR and there is no eye witness of the incident. He contends that accusing fingure is pointed towards applicant merely on the suspicion and that he has settled scores against deceased. 2. Learned APP, on the other hand, submits that there was quarrel between applicant and deceased on account of kite flying in the past and there was old enmity between the two. He submits that material collected on record shows that it was applicant who inflicted knife blows on the person of applicant. 3. There is material placed on record showing that applicant is involved in the offences like the ones under Sections 324, 506, 323, 336 of the Indian Penal Code. There are statements recorded by investigating 2 agency that old enmity existed between applicant and deceased. It is possible that in order to take revenge, applicant may have assaulted deceased. Looking to the criminal antecedents attached to applicant, it would be risky to release him on bail. Application is rejected. However, learned trial Court is expected to expedite trial. Judge. hsj