IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.17659 of 2011 Shanti Devi wife of Kameshwar Thakur Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 4/ 27.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is the mother-in-law of the deceased and during investigation some witnesses stated that the deceased had died on account of bursting of Appendix. In view of such, in the event of surrender of the petitioner, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in connection with Khanpur P.S. Case No.43 of 2010, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C., and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner shall undertake to be represented on the first date after cognizance if the investigation in the case is still pending and in case he fails to do so, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date and be present 2 on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)