IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8558 of 2011 DINANATH JAISWAL, S/O RAJESHWAR JAISWAL, R/O MOHALLA NAKHAS, POLICE STATION, HAJIPUR(TOWN)IN THE DISTRICT OF VAISHALI. …………………Petitioner. VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR. ……………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 05/ 03.08.2011 Perused the report of Superintendent of Police, Samastipur, at Flag-P and Flag- R. From the latest report dated 01.08.2011 at Flag-R, it is clear that the witnesses namely Ramprit Sahani, Umesh Sahani, Mantoon Sahani, Dr. Shobha Sinha and I.O. Raj Kumar Singh have already been examined. That being so, the fact of prosecution evidence is almost in sight. At this stage counsel for the petitioner would submit that two co accused persons whose bail application was earlier rejected by this Court were subsequently granted bail by order dated 20.04.2011 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3409 of 2011 and Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3615 of 2011 dated 13.05.2011, accordingly, the petitioner also deserves to be enlarged on bail. In the considered opinion of this Court, bail to such co accused persons were given at the point of time when the 2 prosecution had not produced the witnesses but today after this Court has found that almost all the prosecution witnesses have been examined, it would not find any reason to grant bail to the petitioner, inasmuch as, the trial of the petitioner is likely to be concluded. Thus this Court would reject the prayer for bail of the petitioner for the present. The trial Court is hereby directed to ensure that as the prosecution had already completed its evidence, it should record the defence version and pronounce the judgment preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)