1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.N.NO.20 OF 2010 IN C.P.NO.246 of 2008 in W.P.No.3110 of 2008 (D) Dadarao Ramraoji Wadekar ..vs.. Shri Mithukrishnan Shankarnarayanan =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.Y.P.Kaslikar Adv. for the petitioner. Mr.M.Sable Adv. for the respondents. C ORAM : Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota,J. DATED : 8th February, 2010. This civil application is taken out for recalling of the order dated 14th of January, 2010. On 14/1/2010, the matter was shown under the caption of orders with a office note that the petitioner had not removed office objections. On that day, when the petition was called out, the petitioner and Advocate were absent. Despite the absence, time of two weeks was given to the petitioner to remove office objections with a further direction that if the office objections are not removed within that 2 period, the petition will stand dismissed without any further reference to the court. Mr.Kaslikar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the matter had appeared on the board wrongly for non-removal of office objection, as there were no office objections for the petitioner to remove. Perusal of the record confirms the statement. Hence, the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (1). The petitioner also prays for withdrawal of the Civil Application No.12 of 2010. That prayer is also granted. JUDGE. chute