IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14615 of 2005 1. GANESH PRASAD CHOUDHARY. 2. RAMANAND CHOUDHARY. 3. MANOJ KUMAR CHOUDHARY ALL ARE SONS OF LATE PHULO DEVI AND LATE SATRUGHAN PRASAD CHOUDHARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GHANGHOUR, P.S. BASUBARHI, DISTRICT MADHUBANI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY FAMILY WELFARE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. DIRECTOR-IN-CHIEF HEALTH SERVICE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. CIVIL SURGEON-CUM-CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER DARBHNAGA. 4. DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, MADHUBANI. 5. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR PATNA ----------- 08. 09.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State as also the Accountant General. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the father of the petitioners has retired on 31st of December 1999 while working on the post of Basic Health Worker in the Primary Health Centre, Kewati, Darbhanga under the respondent no. 3. Later on, father of the petitioner died on 27th of January 2005. It is further submitted that after the retirement of his father, he was paid the provisional pension till May 2002. Later on again the payment of provisional pension re-started in the month of August 2004 and as such, for the intervening period no pension was paid. It is further 2 submitted that the case of the petitioner is that after the death of his father, mother started receiving the family pension, however, she died on 07.02.2008 without receiving full pension. Learned counsel for the State on the other hand submits that the averments made in the writ application are not clear. Counsel for the Accountant General submits that it has not been brought on the record in detail as to what is the amount which was received by the father and mother of the petitioners as a retiral dues. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 3 with a copy to respondent nos. 4 and 5. In view of the above, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled and admitted dues may 3 also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. However, upon consideration if any of the claims or part of the claims are not being paid the same shall be informed to the petitioners with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)