CWP (T) No.4634 of 2008 05.6.2009 Present: Mr. Anuj Nag, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Additional Advocate General for the respondents. The petitioner was appointed as Beldar. The precise case of the petitioner is that though he was appointed as Beldar, however, he was discharging the duties of Supervisor. The petitioner has failed to produce any tangible evidence to establish that he has been working as Supervisor. The averments made in the petition are emphatically denied by the respondent-State. The petitioner has not chosen to file any rejoinder to the reply filed by the respondent-State. Accordingly, there is no merit in the present petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. June 05, 2009. (rkv)