IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 12686 of 2009 Between: Sri Rajarajeshwari Transport Company, Having office at H.No.2-3-64/8, Flat No.202, Saipurna Apartments, Tirumala Nagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad, rep.by its Managing Partner, Mada Nagaraju, S/o. Rajesham, Aged 32 Yrs, H.No.2-10-123, Jyothinagar, Karimnagar. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Andhra Pradesh State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Regd. Office at 6-3-655/1/A, C.S. Bhavan, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, rep. by its Vice Chairman & Managing Director. 2 The Joint Collector & Ex-Officio Executive Director (EOED), Andhra Pradesh State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Office at D.No.14-200, Shadnagar, Khailashnagar, Adilabad District, Adilabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.RAVINDER Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue an appropriate order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the impugned action of the respondents in not considering the price bid quoted by the petitioner for transport of levy sugar from sugar factories to MLS points in Adilabad District by comparing all six slabs while assessing the relative comparison of participant tenderers in the tender process in pursuance of tender notification issued vide proceedings No.PDS.1/Movt (Sugar) 5 (1)/2009- 10, dt. 24.02.2009 is illegal, void, arbitrary and contrary to the Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents to consider the award of contract by taking into consideration the price bid quoted by the tenderers for all the slabs including 6th slab in the tender process in the interest of justice and equity.” At the hearing, Sri A.Ravinder, learned Counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to avail its remedy at appropriate stage. The request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is accepted. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.No.16412 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. .______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 29th June, 2009 lur