IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 9282 of 2011 (O&M) Charanjit Kaur .. Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. P. S. Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J. S. Brar, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the only evidence relied upon by the prosecution in the challan is extra-judicial confession of the accused made before Vinod Kumar and Sajjan Ram, as it is a case of blind murder. Both have been examined in court as PW-1 and PW-2 respectively and they have denied having made any statement to the police regarding extra judicial confession of the accused made before them. In fact, they have turned hostile. In the absence of any other evidence, the petitioner deserves concession of bail. Learned counsel for the State did not dispute the fact that except the extra-judicial confession made by the accused before the aforesaid two witnesses, there is no evidence to link the petitioner with the crime. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts stated before the court, in my opinion, the petitioner deserves concession of bail. She is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Sangrur. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 30.8.2011/mk