COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT DIVISION : HON^BLE .GUPTA, C.J. & HOM'BLE SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Stateof Chhattisgarh, Throuah: Secretar^, Gpvernment of Chhattisgarh, Generai Administratlon Department, <x D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The Cojjector, District Janjglr Champa, Chhattisgarh Versus Sanat Kumsr Kashyap, S/o. Shri Kapll Nath Kashyap, Aged about 40 years, R/o, Viliage Konargarh, TahslS Pamgarh, Dlstrict Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh ^ m w.p. Present: Shri N.K. Agrawai, learned Deputy A.dvocate GeneraE fbr the petitjoners. OR D E R (10tn Septemb.er, 2008) Tr The following order of the Court was passed by C.J.: ^-. Shri N.K. Agrawai; learned Deputy Advocate Genera! for the petltioners is heard on !Vi.(C).P.No.165/2004, a petition for cpndonation of deiay in fiiing the petition for review / modlflcation of the order datsd 25.08.2003 passed in W.P. No.2212/2003. 2) On due consideration, we are satisfied that the petitioners have succeeded In showing sufficient eause for the deiay In filing the petition for revievtf / modificatlon. :~^l k -> ..^'•^^Si '^ ''^ . < }..:.-\'"Y 3) M. (C.) PNo.165/2004, therefore, is ailowed and the deiay in flting the petition for review/modification is hereby condoned. 4) Shrl N.K. Agrawai; learned Deputy Advocate General is heard on petltion for review / modification. 5) The petitloners are seeking review / modlfjcatlon of the order dated 25.08.2003 passed in W.P. No.2212/2003, whereby the writ petition flled by the respondent was disposed of in the followjng terms: !n view of th& abov.e directlons given by the Hon'bSe Apex Court, the Government of Chhattisgam may aiso consider for absorbing the surplus employees who had worked under the Census Department in the iight of the dtrection given by the Hon'ble Apex Court and th8 petitioner is at liberty to approach the Govemment for absorptlon and on his moving, the Government of Chhattisgarh, the Department of Gsnera! Admlnistratlon may conslder hls representatlon appropriately. In vlew of this order, . M(W.)P. No.1999/2003 and i.A. No.6792/2003 stand dlsposeo' of. Wlth these observations, the wrlt petltjon Is disposed of." 6) On due consideration of the submisslons of iearned Deputy y^- . Advocate Generai, we do not flnd any ground warranting revlew/ modificatlon-of the order dated 25.08.2003. 7) The petltion for review / modiflcation, therefore, fails and Is hereby dismlssed. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- . , Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge padma r—~~