:1: bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FERA APPEAL NO.95 OF 2006 The Union of India & Ors. ..Appellant Vs. Manhar V.Parekh ..Respondent WITH FERA APPEAL NO.96 OF 2006 The Union of India & Ors. ..Appellant Vs. Balkishan C.Wadia ..Respondent WITH FERA APPEAL NO.97 OF 2006 The Union of India & Ors. ..Appellant Vs. Pramod Khanna ..Respondent Mr.A.S.Rao for appellant. Mr.Anupam Surve i/b. Haresh Mehta & Co.for respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & S.J.KATHAWALLA,JJ. DATE :- 12TH AUGUST, 2010 P.C. Heard. Perused appeals. 2. In all, four appeals were filed against the impugned order. Out of four appeals, one appeal appears to have been dismissed on 22th November, 1994. The Revenue has not taken any steps to get over this order of dismissal. Under these circumstances, the order of dismissal of the appeal has become final and conclusive. Consequently, the impugned order also becomes final and conclusive. In view of the law laid down by this Court in Sheela wd/o Vijay Vs. Central Bank 1998(1) MH.L.J.928, there cannot be two inconsistent orders in the same litigation. With the result, all these remaining appeals are liable to be dismissed for the reasons recorded. In the result, all these appeals stand dismissed with no order as to costs. (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)