IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9890 of 2008 Ashok Kumar, son of Sri Ramotar Yadav, resident of village and P.O. Kedli, Block and P.S. Nauhatta, District- Saharsa. ………….. Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.The District Magistrate, Saharsa 3.The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saharsa 4.The District Superintendent of Education, Saharsa 5.The Block Development Officer, Nauhatta Block, District- Saharsa 6.The Block Education Extension Officer, Block Nauhatta, District- Saharsa 7.The Mukhiya, Panchayat Raj Haati, Block Nauhatta, District- Saharsa 8.The Panchayat Secretary, Panchayat Raj Haati, Block Nauhatta, District- Saharsa 9.Sri Ram Kumar Yadav, son of Sri Chandeshwari Prasad Yadav, resident of village Aaurai, P.O. Chipti, via Panchgachia, District- Madhepura. ………… Respondents ---------------------------------- 2. 30/08/2011 Petitioner is aggrieved by non- consideration of his case for appointment as Panchayat Teacher. He has filed his representation before the Block Development Officer. But, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no final decision has been taken by the authorities in the matter. In the circumstances, this writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the 2 concerned statutory Appellate Authority within four weeks from today, If he does so, the Appellate Authority shall issue notice to the concerned parties giving them opportunity to be heard, shall call for the original records, if necessary, and shall decide the matter on merits, without being swayed away or influenced by any order passed by the Block Development Officer, positively within two months from the date of filing of appeal by the petitioner. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)