:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2470 OF 2005 Sachin @ Pappu Aburao Dudhane. ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent ... Mr.Kuldeep Patil with Mr.Santosh Patil h/f Deepak Girme, for the Applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 25TH APRIL, 2005 P.C.: 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. The learned APP on instruction concedes that the role of the present applicant and that of original Accused No.3 and 4 who have been already released by the Lower court is similar. If it is so, the applicant is entitled for bail :2: on parity, as no other antecedents against the applicant. Accordingly, this application is allowed on the following conditions. (i) The applicant is directed to be enlarged on bail, in connection with the C.R.No.234 of 2004, registered with Haveli Police Station, on executing personal bond in sum of Rs.15,000/- with two local sureties in like amount. (ii) The applicant shall not influence the prosecution witnesses nor tamper prosecution evidence in any manner, whatsoever. (iii) The applicant shall co-operate for early disposal of the trial as condition for bail. In the event, the trial court is of the opinion that the applicant is responsible for delay in trial, the same fact be recorded in roznama and that can be the basis for cancellation of bail.