IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 12892 of 2006 Between: 1 Y. Rudra Goud S/o. Late Y.C. Veerabadra Goud, Hindu Kurnool District, And Ex-Market Yard President Shakti Nivas, Yemmignur, Kurnool DIstrict. 2 Y. Devendra Goud S/o. Y. Gadilinganna Goud, Hindu Emmignur Town TDP President, R/o. Yemmignur, Kurnool DIstrict. 3 Y. Purushotham Goud S/o. Y.C. Veerabadra Goud, Hindu Yemmignur Mandal R/o. Gudekal Village, Yemmignur Mandal , Kurnool DIstrict. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The State Commission, Rep. by its Secretary, O/o. State Election Commission, Budda Bhavan,Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 3 The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 4 The Inspector of Police, Yemmignur Police Station, Yemmigunr Town, Kurnol District. ..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. PERUMALLA VENKAT RAO FOR MR.C.V.BHASKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : --- The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No.3 and 4 for not allowing the petitioners to participate in the election campaign in the local body elections in Yemmiganur Constituency, Kurnool District as illegal, arbitrary, un-constitutional and violative of the Article 19 and 21 of The Constitution of India and consequentially direct the 4th Respondent not to harass and interfere with the election campaign of the petitioners and further direct the respondents 1 and 2 to conduct free and fair elections scheduled to held on 28th June, 2006.” At the hearing, Sri Perumalla Venkat Rao, learned counsel representing Sri C.V.Bhaskar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 1st July, 2009 vrn