IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10636 of 2008 RAMESHWAR YADAV,S/O LATE JAGADISH YADAV, R/O VILLAGE AKALUPUR, P.S.DUMRAON, DISTRICT BUXAR. .............PETITIONER. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3.THE CHIEF ENGINEER, RURAL DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL RANGE, HARDING ROAD, BARAK NO. 2, PATNA. 4.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, HARDING ROAD, BARAK NO.2, PATNA. 5.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DIVISION-2, BUXAR. 6.THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BUXAR. 7.UPENDRA KUMAR, S/O LATE JAGADISH YADAV, R/O VILLAGE AKALUPUR,P.S. DUMRAON, DISTRICT BUXAR. ............RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02/ 03.05.2011 No one appears for the petitioner. Counsel for the State is present and has also filed the counter affidavit, copy of which whereof has been served on the counsel for the petitioner yesterday. The prayer of the petitioner, in this writ application in fact is to quash the appointment of his younger brother(respondent no. 7) who has been appointed on compassionate ground on 29.04.2008, in view of the recommendation made by the District Compassionate Appointment Committee in its meeting held on 22.04.2008. This court having perused the materials on record including the 2 aforementioned resolution of the District Compassionate Appointment Committee in the case of the petitioner find that such consideration made by the committee, does not suffer from any error. Wherein it had held as follows:- Ik=kad 90@ cDlj fnukad 23-01-08 Lskok esa] eq[; vfHk;ark xzkeh.k fodkl fo”ks’k iz{ks= iVuk A fo’k;%& Lo0 txnh”k ;kno] vuqlsod xzkeh.k fodkl fo”ks"k izeaMy la[;k 2 cDlj ds iq+= Jh misUnz ;kno dks vuqdEik ds vk/kkj ij fu;qfDr ds laca/k esa A izlax%& vki dk i=kad 1310 fnukad 07-12-2007 egk”k;] mi;qZDr fo’k;d ,oa izklafxd i= ds vkns”k ds vkyksd esa bl dk;kZy; ds i=kad 1075 fnukad 27-12-2007 ds }kjk fucaf/kr Mkd }kjk Lo0 txnh”k ;kno vuqlsod ds ifRu eks0 njoh nsoh ,oa iq= Jh jkes”oj ;kno] Jh ckcq/ku ;kno] misUnz ;kno ,oa izse dqekj dks lgefr izkIr djus gsrq fnukad 16-01-08 dks dk;kZy; dk;Z vof/k esa cqyk;k x;k fu/kkZfjr frfFk dks Lo0 ;kno vuqlsod ds ifRu eks0 njoh nsoh ,oa lHkh pkjksa HkkbZ v/kksgLRkk{kjh ds le{k mifLFkr gq, A Lo0 txnh”k ;kno ds ifRu eks0 njoh nsoh ,oa iq= okoq/ku ;kno] izse dqekj nkl v/kksgLrk{kjh ds le{k Jh misUnz ;kno dks vuqdEik ds vk/kkj ij fu;qfDr gsrq ekSf[kd ,oa fyf[kr :Ik ls lgefr trkbZ xbZ tks ewy esa layXu fd;k tk jgk gS A Jh jkes”oj ;kno }kjk ,d vkosnu i= ds lkFk Jh f”koth jk; lnL; fcgkj fo/kku lHkk dk i= izkIr gqvk gS A mldh Nk;k izfr layXu dh tk jgh gS A vuq0%& ;Fkkor~ A 1- eq0 njoh nsoh }kjk fyf[kr lgefr i= ewy esa A fo”oklHkktu 2- Jh ckcq/ku ,oa izse dqekj }kjk fyf[kr lgefr i= ewy esa A g0@&vLi’V 3- jkes”oj ;kno }kjk vkosnu i= ewy esa A dk;Zikyd vfHk;Urk 4- Jh f”koth jk;] lnL; fcgkj fo/kku lHkk dk i= xzkeh.k fodkl fo”ks’k izeaMy la0&2 dk Nk;k izfr A cDlj A Inasmuch as, the Compassionate Appointment Committee had considered the case of the petitioner as well but in view of the unanimity amongst all dependent family of the 3 deceased employee had chosen to recommend the case of respondent no. 7, would itself go to show that there was a conscious application of mind to the object of compassionate appointment while recommending and the appointment of respondent no. 7 in keeping with the provisions envisaged in the Government policy contained in circular dated 05.10.1991 as updated from time to time. Thus this Court would not interfere in the consequential appointment of respondent no. 7, but then it has to be made clear that the petitioner is also one of the dependent of the deceased employee and therefore, it will be the duty of respondent no. 7 to also support him. In the event, if no such financial support is given by the respondent no. 7 to the petitioner, he will have the liberty to approach the higher authorities for getting the appointment of respondent no. 7 cancelled on the ground of violation of the terms and conditions of such compassionate appointment. With the aforementioned observations and direction, this application is disposed of. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J) 4