1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3992 OF 2009 Annapurna Co-op. Consumer Society, Mumbai ... Petitioners V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. B.A. Walimbe for the Petitioners. Mr. R.M. Patne, AGP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. Mukesh V. Aiya for Respondent No.6. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATE : 7TH MAY, 2009. P.C. : 1. The petitioner-Society is aggrieved by the order passed by the Hon’ble Minister, Food and Civil Supplies Consumer Protection, on 27th February, 2009 by which the Revision Application filed by respondent No.6 has been allowed and 2 the authorized Ration Shop of respondent No.6 is directed to be attached with additional units after the shop was shifted at Gautam Nagar, Mankhurd, Ghatkopar. 2. The petitioner-Society is aggrieved by this order. It is the contention of the petitioner-Society that respondent No.2 had no power vested in him to pass such an order of transfer of the place of the shop. Apart from this, it is submitted that no hearing was given to the petitioner-Society before the impugned order was passed, affecting the rights of the petitioner-Society. The units available for the Petitioner- Society have been reduced as a consequence. 3. In my view, the Petition can be disposed of by directing respondent No.2 to hear the Revision filed by respondent No.6 afresh. The impugned order is quashed and set aside. It will be open for the petitioner-Society to contend before respondent No.2 that there is no power vested in him to 3 decide such a Revision. The respondent No.2 will consider all contentions raised by the parties i.e. both by the petitioner as well as respondent No.6 and dispose of the Revision Application within a period of four weeks from today. 4. In case an order adverse to the petitioner-Society is passed, it will not be acted upon for a period of two weeks therefrom. .......