IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 39 OF 2006 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1587 OF 2003 IN SUIT NO. 785 OF 1991 Madhava Commercial Premises Co-op. Society Ltd. ... Petitioner (Orig. Respodnent) Vs. United Health Care Limited & Ors. Respondents Orig.Defendants/ Contemnors. Ms. Sweta Doshi for the petitioner. Ms. Vandana Mishra for Respondents. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. DATE : 14th July,2006 DATE : 14th July,2006 DATE : 14th July,2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The Contempt Petition is taken out by the Respondents of the orders dated 1.9.2004 and 25.1.2005. The learned Counsel on both sides admit the position that demand for the outgoings was made by the Petitioner against the Respondents after the Court directed to issue demand in favour of the Respondents in the name of the Respondents. The Respondents have paid all the outgoings. The dispute is with regard to the interest i.e. the liability of the Respondents to pay interest. That aspect cannot be gone into in the Contempt Petition. Since the payment of the outgoings in respect of the premises having been made, there is no contempt. The Contempt Petition stands disposed of. --- (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.)