IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16842 of 2011 Satyendra Sharma @ Rahul Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 30.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner, complainant and Mr. Birendra Kumar, learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of demand of dowry and torture. The petitioner denies the fact that ever any marriage took place rather due to some money dispute the false case has been lodged which has been controverted by the learned counsel for the complainant. The rival contentions of the parties in view of this court can be considered by the learned court below while considering the regular bail of the petitioner and try to dispose off the same if possible on the same day, if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. 2 With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned J.M. Biharshariff (Nalanda)in connection with complaint case no. 439C of 2010 at the cost of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)