r E ww'" IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT WW QWIQKM/kgAn :,. as.P‘” (A A BILASPUR K WRIT PETITION (SI No.é3;i£a0F 2009 Appointing India, Per. 85 HRD (GM2) Section, Local Head Office, Post Box No. 6 Hoshangabad Road, Bhopal—46201 1 (M.P.) W, Regional Manager, State Bank of india,'R.B,O. — III, Indore (M.P.) Branch Manager, State Bank of India, t Bankin—Mongra Branch, Korba (C‘G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS: . I r?6w: I“ , . y, PETITIONER J.N. Nayak, S/o Shri K. Nayak, aged about 52 years, Occupation-Service, presently posted as Assistant Manager, State Bank of India, Collectorate Branch, Indore (M.P.) V E R S U S RESPONDENTS L/ State Bank of India, through its Chief General Manager, (Bhopal—Circle), Bhopal (M.P.) 2. / General Manager (NW—2) & ‘1 ? HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH z BxLASPUR Writ Petition LS) No. 6374 of 2009 Petitioner J. N. Nayak ' Versus Respondents State Bank of India 8t. others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri Ashish Shn'vastava, Advocate with Shli Harsh Wardhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sudeep Agaxwal, Advocate for the respondents. i; ORDE R‘oral} ( Passed on this 23rd day of Februaiy, 20 10) Heatd. By this petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge the notice dated 26.9.2009 (Annexure P] 1). Now, it is informed that the final cider has been passed, terminating the services of the petitioner. 2. Be that as it may, without’going into the merits of the case, in view of the subsequent development,this Wiit petiu'on has become inh‘uctuous. The petitioner is at h’berty to challenge the tinal termination order in a hesh writ petition, if so advised. 3. Accordingly, the {writ petition is dismissed as having become inn‘uctuous, with the above~stated liberty. No order asto costs. ‘6\~ J\ Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri 3. Judge Thakur