.h&' ?.,;1 ^J .(' ^ '^-{^ l^ in 1SE HiGH CQURT OF JijDICATURE AT BiLASPI]R CHHATTiSGARH W.P.fONO. /zeee PETITIONER : / Rajesh Kuniar Agrawal, Aged about 36 yrs, S/o. Oiiiprakash Agrawal.R/o, PaTuhiygpaK, ..•••^V' Baraujkela, District Raigaru (CG), Tlirougu: ..•':r&->'' /• its Power of Attoniey Holuer, Rajendra '/^y / -- .—-- -——^. ^-^^—., \^j^y ..••'" AgrdWa} S/o, Oillprakash, Agcd about 33 ^s^ ^/yt7 ^</ ""-y nawal S/o, Oiiiprakash, Agcd about 33 years, R/o. Sr. Office Sulida, Districi Bar^rh (Orissa) VERSUS T^'S?£<'I5'^kTfeT?\T?1^.PT(e( ^ KN 1S : .'l'v. /....... •.... ..... .. \ ^ ^- 'v sw.y fi^n 'p'4? ^w-fe.1 I -7^-// ..4. ' .^/ ^^aS^" 1] CImattisgarh State Electridty Board, KS /^t-—*—^—— t^uainiiau. Kaipur, District Raipur (CG) ^2] Assistant EiigiBeer, Ciuiattisgarh State! Electricity Boar<i, Baranikela, Taiisil Saran^ru, District Rai^ru (CG) rixecutive liugineer (Vigilauce} C'uiattisgafh Stote EIectrieiiy Board, Raigarii, Kstriet Rai^rh (CG) 'WSTT PETmON L7NDER ARTICLE 226 ^'F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDL4 FOR A WMT, ORDER OR ^3] c DIRECTiON EN THE NATURE OF CERTIGRARI OR ANi' OTHER APPROPRIATE ACTION THEREBY iTTASTTnvf^/sii'TTrivr; AgTnii' THIJ' TiwpTrrawB'n RrrT rti;" <-'^^KJAAAj.s<vXFUAl/jL Axi^^-B' rx^M^yMLi S.S.iSLt Aj.¥AA <j^Ji,^iAi/A? ASxA-fA-* ^LfA1 A^ £'!'» ^fio/ 'DATGTEPT^ 151.7' Ttm?f Z»TE?fe<T>Kr7kTfcmTTt-KTT'ef fWT A f^fff\vr»iSrTT1 KAisau t* z x ru!, itaar'ui'tuiiff'i i s uw AI/I-.UUI'S i ALLEGED TMErT OF K.NO.e314902/90/Ql/46514 INSTALLED AT PARDHIYAPAI BARATvIKELA, DISTT.RAIGAmi.CHATTISGARH XI-HC-78 ati^T^irf^iRi trarsn^TsbtiIqi 1 WH^I SfrWcb SST^IFIRPT, OTTIwiS, f°l<11«y . Vl.P.hto. L(^&7/^006 ^ 200 an^r <»3ra;(qqigg^r) ?T<nwgfer3n^T 22-1-2007 wniicii tfte yiui Mauoj Karaaipe, ShriA.S. Gaharwar, Heanl ou adinission. llie peunoner lias Bill of ftanexure P-3 Ks. 15,07,907/- on me basi^ Leamect counsel tor Uie inspecnon report ot 41 conducted in ftie preniisesl Aruiexure p-8. However, in^ second nispection report, Ul|( agamst ftnnexure f-3. Me representation to t&e Supei|t raisuig JQ.lS gnevances ags however, fhey are not decidu|i: On ttie otlier tiancl, CIihattlsgarh State Electricit^ Electriciw Regulatory Co] Electricity Regulaton' Con^ (Jonsuiaers ancl ustabii^. ODibudsinaa) RegiUations, 2f. inectianisni &as Deen consum.ers regarduig ttieir el{ i have heard leamed c<t> 4dvocate for the petitioner. for the respoudeuts. Advocate )initi Trlmi 2004 provi<)tecl q>l<lf<vl41-l IIIClTffte^l'iRlWK ^siRliTsn^r pri^ferred fhis petition agaia.st issuaace of &as been issuea tor a sum ot ot uispectton report ot Annexure r-2. peUtioner subinits Uiat subsequent to ^iuiexure V-2, aiiotlier inspecUon was ot t&e peuuoner on au-li-'^uua vitle ^tead ol takuig action m. pursiiaace ot responaents are uisistuig tor pa^inent ti|irttier subiaits tfi.at Iie Jiad. pi'eterred. a ig tingineer vicle Annexure P-13 aia|st the aforesaid act of the respondents du|ig &is representation. learaed counsel for fhe respondents/ ^ Board submits that Chhattisgarh State mijiission has framed Chhattisgarh State )H|inission tKedressat ot Unevances ot thinent of Fonun aad Electricity and as per Regulation 22, coiaplam.t for redressal of any dispute of fhe ictricitv bills. c<|>unsel tor Uie parties. . -- s'>upei|iatenanij agamlst XI-HC-78 HT*RfTa>*1|th 3^' •<ll<<ld'i<, aTfttf'is, R|c)M^< . CO- P- Mo. L't^ C7/66 W=[ 200 3l1^?TV^Sf; ('^3^81") 3n^T^TR-fi+ trarwwsTra STdTwgfersn^T In view ot tlie su&lius; pames, tne uistant peUtion responctents to declcle the attorcluig aa opportunity ot is unsatistied wiui uie urtcler Kegulanon 'z'z ol t&e The petition is accordir decisKtill s|ions made by counsel tbr respecti.ve tlie is disuosed of with a direction to fhe ^epresentation of Aiuiexure P-13 after qeanng to Uie peUUoner. It tlie petiUoner tte m.ay opt for t&e reiuedies avauable Kegulauons. u^gly clisposed ol. aftove i>i<<fc]<l1'i iiiciTffte'^t'^RifciH ^3if^iT3n^r Sd/- OhirendraMtetea Judge P.T.O.