-"^ k IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) No.^A4 /2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^•::':". 1^^^ . ...->PV1V;^':" ^'y^<^>^ ^..--"^' Dilip Singh Jagat S/o Sri Salgam Singh, Aged about 46 years, R/o I.T.I. Routpura, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar-(C.G.) VERSUS 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through : Secretary Technical Education, Jan Shakti Niyojan, Science 85 Technology, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2) Collector, Jagdalpur, District Jagdalpur-(C.G.) 3) Principal, Industa-ial Training Institute, Jagdalpur, Distt. Jagdalpur-fC.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRFT PETmON <S} No. 7606 of2011 Dilip Sineh Jaeat. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisearh &. Others. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUHON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shn Satish ICAgnihofai, J. Present: Shri Sunil Otwani, Advocate for the petitioner Shri Arun Sao, Govemment Advoeate for the State/respondents ORDER (Passed on 14th day ofDecember, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 27.09.2011 (Armexure P/l), fhe petitioner, workina as Trainmg Superintendent Industrial Traming Iristimte, Jagdalpur, has been transferred to Industrial Trainins Itistitute- Mahasamund, on his own request. However, the petitioner has not vet been relieved to join the new place of postme. Shri Otwani further submits that once the order oftransfer has been passed, it is for the govemment to ensure tfaat it is complied with immediately. He- relies on a decision ofthe Supreme Court in Sreedam Chandra Ghosh v. State ofAssam & others^, m support of his contention that ifthe order is not comolied with, a direction can be issued for enforcement thereof. 2. Leamed counsel appearmg for the State/respondents submits that that ifthe transfer order dated 27.09.2011 (Annexure P/l) is still in existence and has not been complied with; appropriate steps would be taken to complv with the order. 3. Iffhe aforesaid transfer order is still in existence and no other order has been passed in respect of the petitioner. the soverament is under an obligation to compiy with the same at once. It is accordinelv directed that the transfer order shall be comolied with forthwith, within aperiod oftwo weeks. — 4. Aceordinely, this petition is disposed of J j §(]/. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge (1^6)10SCCS67