IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Cr.Misc. NO. M 5951 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION 15.5.2009 Rajan Dhir ......PETITIONER VERSUS State of UT and another ......RESPONDENTS PRESENT: Mr. Atul Lakhanpal,Sr.Advocate with Mr. RS Chahal, Advocate. Mr. PK Khindria, Advocate for UT Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Advocate . M.M.S.BEDI,J. Learned counsel for Central Excise Commissionerate informs that though the petitioner has joined the proceedings but relevant record i.e. CENVAT credit record has not been produced. Shri Jasvinder Singh, Superintendent ( Central Excise) Chandigarh is present in the court . He has stated that at present the petitioner is not required to be arrested u/s 13 read with Section 19 of the Central Excise Act but he is only required to cooperate in the inquiry. In view of the above said circumstances, this petition is disposed of with a direction that in case he is to be arrested u/s 13 and 19 of the above said Act, he will be given a notice of seven days in writing to enable him to avail any legal remedy available to him. However, it is directed that the petitioner will continue to join any inquiry pending against him or his company and will produce the relevant record, in accordance with law. In case of non compliance of any of the above said conditions,it will be open to the representative of respondent No.2 to seek cancellation of pre-arrest bail granted to the petitioner. May 15 ,2009 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE