THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Tr.C.M.P.No.108 of 2010 ORDER: The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent took place on 05.02.2007. Soon thereafter, they started living separately, on account of the differences or misunderstandings. The respondent filed O.P.No.45 of 2009 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Sircilla, against the petitioner, for divorce. It is stated that the petitioner has also instituted proceedings under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and under Section 125 Cr.P.C., in the Courts at Nizamabad. She filed this Tr.C.M.P. with a prayer to transfer O.P.No.45 of 2009 to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Nizamabad. The petitioner contends that she is residing with her brother at Nizamabad and it would be difficult for her to attend the Court at Sircilla. The respondent, on the other hand, states that he is a very low paid employee in a Temple and that he cannot afford to prosecute the proceedings at Nizamabad. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent. It is rather unfortunate that the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent suffered a set back within a short time. Though the numbers of the proceedings are not furnished, the petitioner states that she filed a maintenance case and O.P. for restitution of conjugal rights against the respondent. The convenience of a woman spouse becomes relevant. The hardship that is caused to the respondent can be mitigated by directing that the Court at Nizamabad shall conclude the proceedings as early as possible, without insisting on appearance of the respondent on every date of hearing. Hence, the Tr.C.M.P. is allowed and the O.P.No.45 of 2009 pending on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Sircilla, is transferred to the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Nizamabad. On such transfer, the learned Senior Civil Judge, shall conclude the proceedings within three months from the date of receipt of the record. He shall not insist on appearance of the respondent, except where it is needed for his evidence or reconciliation. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dated:05.07.2010 GJ