HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.4740 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.09.2011 **** Bimla Devi & Ors. . . . . Petitioners VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. RK Arora, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG Punjab **** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioners who are working on different posts in the Education Department, Government of Punjab seek protection of the Boarder House Rent Allowance in terms of the Government instructions dated 12.09.2007 (Annexure P11) along with consequential benefits. (2). During the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions states that the petitioners have been found entitled to the benefit of protection of the Border House Rent Allowance and the consequential arrears have been/are being paid to them. (3). That being so, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. (4). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 09.09.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge