1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9467 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Mr.S.D.Patil for the petitioner. Mr.Amol P. Mhatre for the respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 3rd March 2010. P.C.: . By the impugned order application made by the petitioner for de-exhibiting a document has been rejected. The order is purely interlocutory in nature which is capable of being challenged in the appeal which may be preferred by the petitioner against decree passed in the suit if the same be adverse to the petitioner. Even if the document is marked as exhibit, all issues relating to the proof of contents of the documents and evidentiary value thereof always remain open. Subject to what is observed above, writ petition is not entertained and the same is rejected. (A.S.OKA,J)