1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2007 OF 2005 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2008 OF 2005 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2009 OF 2005 M/s.Scan Organics Ltd. & Ors. ..Petitioners. V/s. Mega Fin (India) Ltd. & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr.N.R.Shah for Mr.Ajay Rao for petitioners. Mrs.M.H.Mhatre, APP for State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J A.M.KHANWILKAR,J A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE DATE DATE : DECEMBER 14, 2005. : DECEMBER 14, 2005. : DECEMBER 14, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. Heard. The grounds raised before this Court can be effectively answered by the Revisional Court. 2. As alternative efficacious remedy is available to the petitioners by way of revision before the Sessions Court in view of the decision of this Court in the case of V.K.Jain & Ors. vs. V.K.Jain & Ors. vs. V.K.Jain & Ors. vs. Pratap Pratap Pratap V.Padode reported in 2005(3) Mh.L.J. 778, V.Padode reported in 2005(3) Mh.L.J. 778, V.Padode reported in 2005(3) Mh.L.J. 778, no interference is warranted. 3. These petitions are disposed of with liberty to take recourse to remedy of revision, if so advised. All questions are left open. 2 4. The petitioners to file such Revision Application within four weeks from today. Till such time, no precipitative action be taken against the Petitioners. Revision Application, if filed within four weeks from today, be considered on its own merits in accordance with law. 5. In case, there is delay in filing Revision Application, Court will take into account the fact that the petitioners had first approached this Court, which period may be excused in computing delay. 6. Petitions disposed of on the above terms.