1 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 218 OF 2010 TATA Capital Ltd. . ..Petitioner. Vs. Vishalkumar Kanubhai Khatri ...Respondent. ---- Mr. Nikhil Mehta i/b KMC Legal Venture, for the Petitioner. None for Respondent. ---- CORAM: R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 31st MARCH, 2010 P.C. 1. Affidavit of service is filed. Perused the same. Respondent is absent though served. 2. The Petitioners claim that they had advanced personal loan to the Respondent. According to Petitioners the said loan has not been repaid by the Respondent. I have heard learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioners in regard to various prayers and in my view as of today the Respondent can be directed to file a statement in the form of an affidavit disclosing therein various movable and immovable properties held by him. In my view no other relief can be granted though diverse reliefs have been claimed in regard to the property described in Exhibit (c). This is so because the Petitioners have not made out prima facie case that the Respondent is the owner of the property in regard to Exhibit (c). 2 Hence, I pass the following order disposing of the Petition. ORDER Respondent is directed to file a statement in the form of an affidavit before the Arbitrator disclosing the movable and immovable properties owned by him. Such statement/affidavit must be filed before the Arbitrator within three weeks from today. The Petition stands disposed of in terms of above order with no order as to costs. (R.Y. GANOO, J.)