IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13766 of 2009 VACHASPATI TIWARI, SON OF LATE ANUKA TIWARI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST OFFICE-GORARI, POLICE STATION KARAKAT (GORARI), DISTRICT ROHTAS. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION BIHAR AT PATNA. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ROHTAS AT SASARAM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR CONSOLIDATION, ROHTAS AT SASARAM. 4. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND REFORMS, BIKRAMGANJ DISTRICT ROHTAS. 5. THE CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, KARAKAT, POLICE STATION KARAKAT (GORARI), DISTRICT ROHTAS. 6. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, GORARI, POLICE STATION KARAKAT (GORARI), DISTRICT ROHTAS. 7. BINOD KUMAR GUPTA, SON OF LATE JAGDISH PRASAD 8. PRAMOD KUMAR GUPTA, SON OF LATE JAGDISH PRASAD. 9. ALAKH NIRANJAN PRASAD, SON OF LATE SAHDEO SAH 10. KUBER PRASAD, SON OF LATE LSAHDEO SAH. 11. KRISHNA CHAND PRASAD, SON OF LATE SAHDEO SAH. RESPONDENT NOS. 7 TO 11 ARE RESIDENT OF VILL- AGE AND POST OFFICE GORARI, POLICE STATION KARAKAT (GORARI), DISTRICT ROHTAS. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 26.10.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner has filed this writ application asserting that the Anchaladhikari, Karakat, respondent no.6 is going ahead with his proceedings to mutate the land in question in favour of private respondents on the basis of the order passed by the Chakbandi authorities in Case Nos.363/364 of 1997 as contained in Annexures 1 and 2 and while doing so he is ignoring the - 2 - N.H./ mutation order already made in regard to the lands in question in favour of the father of the petitioner and such fact has already been brought to the notice of the Anchaladhikari, Karakat, respondent no.6 vide petition dated 23.9.2008 (Annexure-7) and 30.6.2009 (Annexure-9). Having heard counsel for the petitioner,State I direct the petitioner to file fresh copy of the aforesaid two petitions (Annexures 7 and 9) before the Anchaladhikari, respondent no.6 annexing a copy of the mutation order of the lands in question made in favour of his father whereafter the Anchaladhikari (Respondent No.6) should pass appropriate order in accordance with law. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. ( V.N. Sinha,J.)