IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41750 of 2010 MD.JUNED ALAM @ JUNED & ANR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and for the State. Alleging false implication in a Police Case under Sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 307, 504, 379, 354 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, it is submitted that earlier there was more litigation between the parties. In view of the nature of the allegations with regard to the use of an iron rod, insertion of the same into the body of the informant coupled with the medical report as noticed at paragraph-5 of the impugned order of rejection from the case diary, the Court is not persuaded that the present is a fit case for the privilege of anticipatory bail. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioners shall be considered on its own merit. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)