1 SB Civil Writ Petition No.4768/2009 Dungarpur Central Cooperative Bank. vs. Employees Provident Fund Organisation & Anr. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4768/2009 Dungarpur Central Cooperative Bank. vs. Employees Provident Fund Organisation and another. Date : 15.5.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.PS Bhati, for the petitioner. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is aggrieved against the order dated 29.9.2008 passed by the respondents by which a demand of Rs.12,82,724/- has been raised against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though the order under challenge is appealable but the appeal is not an efficacious remedy in view of the fact that for preferring appeal, the petitioner is required to deposit 75% 2 SB Civil Writ Petition No.4768/2009 Dungarpur Central Cooperative Bank. vs. Employees Provident Fund Organisation & Anr. of the demand raised in the impugned order. Looking to the facts of the case and the contention raised by the petitioner that the persons who have been treated as petitioner's employees are not the employees of the petitioner, which is a question of fact, I do not find any reason to interfere in my writ jurisdiction when alternate remedy of appeal is available to the petitioner. The precondition of deposit of any amount itself will not be a reason for avoiding the alternate remedy. In view of the above, this writ petition is hereby dismissed. The petitioner may avail the alternate remedy. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya