IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1125 of 2004 (M/B) 1. Arya Samaj Mandir Shrawan Nath Nagar, Haridwar through its Manager. 2. Virendra Panwar s/o Shri Shyam Singh, Manager, Arya Samaj Mandir, Sharawan Nath Nagar, Haridwar, District Haridwa …… Petitioners Versus 1. The State of U.P. through Secretary (Home), U.P. Govt. Lucknow. 2. Superintendent of Police, Haridwar. 3. Station House Officer, Police Station, Kotwali, District Haridwar. 4. Mahak Singh, Inspector Kotwali, District Haridwar. 5. Chairman, Human Rights Commission, Patel House, Sansad Marg, New Delhi. 6. District Magistrate, Haridwar …… Respondents ………… None for the petitioners. Sri Subhash Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 3 and 6. None for respondents 4 and 5. Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Petitioners’ counsel absent. Sri Subhash Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 3 and 6. None for respondents 4 and 5. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 05.06.2006 05.06.2006 A