IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 4739 of 2011 along with CWPs No. 4445, 4647, 4649, 4650, 4680, 4681, 4681, 4684, 4685, 4686, 4689, 4690, 4691, 4692, 4693, 4697, 4698, 4699, 4700, 4701, 4702, 4703, 4704, 4705, 4706, 4707, 4708, 4709, 4710, 4711, 4712, 4713, 4717 and 4725 of 2011. Decided on: 22.6.2011. __________________________________________________________ 1. Gaytri Devi versus State of H.P. and others. 2. Vivek Modgil versus State of H.P. and others. 3. Shiv Kumar and ors. versus State of H.P. and another. 4. Prem Lal & others. versus State of H.P. and another. 5. Rajiv Kumar versus State of H.P. and another. 6. Shashi Pal versus State of H.P. and others. 7. Pawan Kumar & Ors. versus State of H.P. and others. 8. Arvind Om Parkash & anr. Vs. State of H.P. and others. 9. Naresh Kumar & Ors. versus State of H.P. and others. 10. Anju Kumari versus State of H.P. and others. 11. Jaspal & others versus State of H.p. and others. 12. Satnam Singh versus State of H.P. and others. 13. Alka Devi versus State of H.P. and others. 14. Sardar Singh Thakur versus State of H.P. and others. 15. Arti Sharma & ors. Versus State of H.P. and others. 16. Richa Sharma versus State of H.P. and o thers. 17. Satish Kumar Negi versus State of H.P. and others. 18. Babita Mahajan versus State of H.P. and others. 19. Kamni Bala versus State of H.P. and others. 20. Kartar Chand versus State of H.P. and others. 21. Davinder Kumar & ors. Versus State of H.P. and others. 22. Nardev Singh & anr. Versus State of H.P. and others. 23. Sunita Kumari versus State of H.P. and others. 24. Shikha Mahajan versus State of H.P. and others. 25. Desh Raj versus State of H.P. and others. 26. Anjana Kumari versus State of H.P. and others. 27. Tek Chand & ors. Versus State of H.P. and others. 2 28. Jagdish Chand s/o Dittu Ram vs. State of H.P. and others. 29. Jagdish Chand /so Abal Ram vs. State of H.P. and others. 30. Gian Chand versus State of H.P. and others. 31. Tarlok Kumar versus State of H.P. and others. 32. Chander Shekhar Sharma vs. State of H.P. and another. 33. Anita Devi & ors. Versus State of H.P. and others. 34. Lalit Kumar & ors. Versus State of H.P. and others. 35. Rajinder Paul & ors. Versus State of H.P. and others. __________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner(s) : M/s Anup Rattan, Avnish Bhardwaj, Surinder P. Sharma, Lavnish Kanwar, Rajinder Thakur, K.B. Khajuria, R.K. Negi, Ashwani Sharma and Mr. Madan Sharma vice Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocates. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State. ___________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral). The petitioners are contract teachers/para teachers. They claim salary for the vacation. That issue is now covered in favour of the petitioners by the decision of this Court in Baldev Singh versus State of H.P. and others and the judgment has become final. Therefore, there will be a direction to 2nd respondent/competent authority to release the due and admissible vacation salary to the petitioners, in case the same has not been granted so far, within a period of four months from the date of production of copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment referred to above. If the amounts are not disbursed as above, the petitioners will be entitled to interest at the rate of 10% per annum and the erring officers will be personally liable for the same. 3 2. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. (Justice V.K. Sharma) June 22, 2011. Judge. (cr/cs)