IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7459 of 2009 VIDYA BHUSHAN ROY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 06.07.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner prays for direction to the respondents to make payment of admitted dues amounting to Rs. 72,621/- against the works executed by him. The petitioner submits that his claim has been rejected by the impugned order dated 2.2.2009 considering that this court had rejected its claim. He further submits that it would appear from annexure 4 that this court had held that writ for directing respondents to make the payment of admitted dues is not maintainable, as such, same was dismissed on that score only. The petitioner states that the Executive Engineer too verified and found Rs. 72,621/- payable to the petitioner. The State submits that the petitioner had earlier filed writ for payment of dues vide CWJC no. 7725 of 2008 which was held not to be maintainable. According to the petitioner, his claim has been rejected misconstruing the order passed by the court that the writ petition has been dismissed on merit. The instant writ petition is disposed of with observation that it would be open for the petitioner to represent before the authorities that the writ petition had not been dismissed on merit. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J).