IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10336 of 2008 SHEO NANDAN PRASAD son of Late Laxchuman Mahto, resident of Village Gudaru, Tola Bhuiya Bigha P.S.Guraru, District Gaya. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.Joint Director Consolidation, Gaya. 3.Consolidation Officer, Paraiya,Dist.Gayaa 4.Rajendra Prasad son of Late Jhago Mahto, resident of village Gudaru Tola Bhuiya Bigha P.S.Guraru Dist. Gaya. ----------- 2 30.4.2009. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner has filed this application for quashing the order dated 16.4.2008, passed by Joint Director, Consolidation, Gaya in Revision case no.211 of 2007 whereby the revision filed by respondent no.4 has been allowed and the name of the petitioner has been ordered to be recorded over Chak Khata no.428 Chak Khesra No.869 having an area of 0.09 decimals. On perusal of the impugned order I find that it has not been disputed by the petitioner before the revisional court (as respondent) that Rajendra Prasad has also got right title and interest with respect to the disputed land. His case is that Rajendra Prasad had relinquished his right and now he can not claim it. The impugned order shows that no such document showing relinquishment by the private respondent no.4 was brought by the present petitioner before the revisional court. All other points has duly been discussed by the revisional court and reasoned finding has been recorded which needs no interference. Accordingly this application is dismissed. Sss/- (Mridula Mishra, J)