1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8321 OF 2010 Jagdish Mannalal Agrawal & ors. ... PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri V.D. Hon, Advocate for the petitioner Shri K.J. Ghute Patil, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 3 ..... CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 11th October, 2010 PER COURT : 1. An order passed by the District Deputy Registrar, Co- operative Societies, Jalgaon, dated 26.8.2010, recommending initiation of action in accordance with Government Resolution dated 14.1.2008 is subjected to challenge in this writ petition. It is the contention of the petitioners that the Government has taken a policy decision which is reflected in Circular dated 6.5.2010. As per the policy decision taken by the State Government, a Committee is required to take decision as regards the permissibility or necessity of initiating criminal action against the defaulter office bearers of the Cooperative Society. It is the contention of the petitioners that the District Deputy Registrar has failed to adopt the procedure prescribed under the Government Circular dated 6.5.2010. The learned A.G.P. 2 appearing for the State submits that, the report of the Auditor along with the explanation tendered by the petitioners would be placed before the Committee and the Committee would take appropriate decision in the matter in accordance with the policy prescribed by the State reflected in the circular referred to above. A grievance is made by the learned A.G.P. that in spite of several requests, the petitioners have not tendered any record to the Auditor. Shri Hon, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners undertakes on instructions from his clients that the petitioners would tender relevant record before the Committee. The Committee would be free to call upon the petitioners to place relevant record for purposes of recording decision in the matter. In the event of failure of the petitioners to submit record, it would be open for the Committee to recommend initiation of appropriate action against the petitioners including the action as contemplated by the policy decision of the State Government reflected in Circular dated 6.5.2010. With the above observations, no interference is required to be caused in the petition. Writ Petition stands rejected. R.M. BORDE JUDGE fmp/wp8321.10 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12933 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8321 OF 2010 Namit Gopal Agrawal ... APPLICANT VERSUS Jagdish s/o Mannallal Agrawal & others ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri S.S. Kulkarni, Advocate for the applicant Shri V.D. Hon, Advocate for original writ petitioner Shri K.J. Ghute Patil, A.G.P. for respondent State ..... CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 11th October, 2010 PER COURT : 1. In view of disposal of the main Writ Petition, present Civil Application does not survive and hence, same stands disposed of. R.M. BORDE JUDGE fmp/wp8321.10