IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.4416 OF 2010 Between:- Potnuru Srinivasa Rao …Petitioner A n d Devaguptapu Vijaya Rama Raju and another …Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.4416 of 2010 ORDER: This petition is filed against the return of EASR filed by the petitioner in E.P.No.144 of 2010 in R.C.C.No.2 of 2007, on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum- Rent Controller, Vizianagaram. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the record. 3. The petitioner herein is a third party claim petitioner before the executing Court. The first respondent herein filed E.P.No.144 of 2010 seeking to execute the decree for eviction passed against the second respondent in R.C.C.No.2 of 2007. The petitioner filed EASR seeking a direction not to pass any orders in respect of the schedule property as he is in possession of the same. 4. As seen from the docket proceedings of the Court below, the petition was returned with certain objections and the petitioner represented the same with an endorsement that all objections are complied with. The petition was, however, returned again and again for non- compliance with the objections and the petitioner has been re-submitting the same stating that the objections have been complied with. Ultimately, the petition was again returned on 04-08-2010 seeking compliance with the objections. Aggrieved by the same, the present civil revision petition is filed. 5. Whether or not the objections raised by the Court below are proper and whether or not the same have been complied with by the petitioner, does not fall for consideration by this Court. 6. If the petitioner feels that the office of the Court below has been returning the petition without valid reason in spite of compliance with the office objections, it is open to the petitioner to make a request that the matter be called at bench and seek an order from the Court. In fact, such a request appears to have been made by the petitioner while representing the petition on 30-07-2010. However, without the matter being called at bench, the petition was again returned on 04-08-2010. 7. In the circumstances, the petitioner is given liberty to approach the Court below and renew his request for the matter being called at bench and invite an order from the Court. On such request being made, the Court below shall consider and pass appropriate orders. 8. The civil revision petition is disposed of accordingly with a liberty as stated above. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 20th October, 2010. Note: Office to return the original petition to enable the petitioner to approach the Court below. B/o Lrkm