@ HWH COUH? OF CHHATTISC-‘&RH A? EELASPUR CLMP. No.1 11 of 2011 1n . 3y this petition under Section 482 of the Code ot' Criminai Procedure. 1973 (for shmt ‘Code’), the petitianer has’ chailenged lega!ity and propriety of the arder dared 5.2.2011 pa$sed by the Judicia! Magistrate Firsi Class. Mahasamund in Criminai Case No.2ngi2910, whereby en the basie 9f appiication med on behaif of era-accused Sheeiai Dhruv the ma! Court ‘afier considering the evidence of Ashck Chandrakar and Dhaneeh Sahu has impieaded the preseng petiiisner as an accused. Heard on i.A,No.D2 for raking document en recerd. On due consideraiion, LANQGZ is aiiowed. Decumeni is iaken an recerd. Heard an edmissicn. The praeent petitioner has directly fried petitien under Secricn 432 0f the Code againsr the order passed by the Judiciai Magistrate First Class, Mahasamund having atternative remedy of revision. in the tight of evidence of Ashok Chandrakar (PWn’t) and Dhanseh Sahu (WV-2). prime fecie the iriai Court has noi committed any iiiegeiity warranting interference in exercise of extraordinary inherent jurisdiction in terms of Section 432 of the Code. Consequently, the petition is dismissed in timine, subject to payment oi cest of Rs.3OOG/- to respondent No.1!State within to days from today before the triai Court. .i § (Petiticn undar Section 482 of the Cr.F’.C.) (SB: Han’bie Mr. T.P. $harma, J.) Mr.Suni! Sahu, cnmsei for ihe petiiioner. Mr.Sumeet Jhanwar, Pane! Lawyer far ihe Siate/respondeni Nari, .0..-— ORBEE§ QRAL (Passed an 15 March, 2M1) {nbwk)-i Sd/— T.P. Sharma Judge Petitione: Pawan Chandrakar Sic Léiwhar Prasad Chandrakar; aged about a$ yearS, Rio Viilage Kuieia, P.S.-Pa!ar§, DistL—Raipur (CG) VemuS iiespondent State of Chhatiisgar'h; through Distn‘ci Magi$trate Mahasamund, Districi~ Mahasamund (653.) Accused 2. Sheeia! Dhruw, Sin Tijau Ram Dhruw, aged about 40 years. R/e Achanakpur, P.S.-Tumgaon at preseni ward m5 Nayapara, Mahasamund, DistiMahasamund (6.3.)