IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA WRIT PETITION NO : 9975 of 1995 Between: A.Nagarathnamma, D/o.Subbarayudu, aged about 25 years, Additional Grama Sevika, Gooty, R/o. Gooty, Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1.The Commissioner of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Insurance Building, Tilak Road, Hyderabad. 2.The Project Director, District Rural Development Agency, Anantapur. 3.The District Collector & Chairman, District Rural Development Agency, Anantapur ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner in the cadre of Additional Grama Sevika fixing her pay in the time scale of pay as applicable to Grama Sevikas in Mandal Praja Parishads revised from time to time and pay arrears of salary fixing her pay in regular time scale of pay as applicable to Grama Sevikas in Mandal Praja Parishads. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.V.K.VISWANADHAM Counsel for the Respondents: G.P. FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT. The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard both sides. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that her services have not been regularized as Additional Grama Sevika in the District Rural Development Agency, Anantapur. 3. The learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj submits that the issue is pending before the Government to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22-04- 1992. 4. Whether the petitioner falls within the four corners of G.O.Ms.No.212 or not is a pure question of fact. 5. Hence, suffice it to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: “The respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, and communicate the same to the petitioners.” 6. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. ----------------------- D.S.R.VARMA, J 09TH SEPTEMBER 2004 KRK To: 1.The Commissioner of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Insurance Building, Tilak Road, Hyderabad. 2.The Project Director, District Rural Development Agency, Anantapur. 3.The District Collector & Chairman, District Rural Development Agency, Anantapur. 4.Two C.Cs to the Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development, High Court Buildings, A.P., Hyderabad (OUT). 5.Two C.D. Copies.