1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Contempt Petition No. 108 of 2007 IN Writ Petition No.2914 of 2002 [decided] [Ku. K.P. Borkar & ors. Vs. Smt. K.A. Rajedhar] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Ms. P.D. Rane, Advocate for the petitioners. Mrs. Ambulkar, Advocate, holding for Mr. S.P. Bhandarkar, Adv., for the respondent sole. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 30th November,2007. 1. Heard. 2. Perused the contents of petition, annexures and reply filed by the respondent. 3. The affidavit of the respondent has gone unchallenged. 4. Petitioners have failed to make out a case of willful act of disobedience of the order of this Court. 5. Even otherwise, order states that If the petitioners are in the employment..... . 2 This suggests that a positive finding of fact about petitioners being in the employment was not recorded. Even an unambiguous direction to pay salary is not given by this Court. 6. Therefore, it is not possible from facts on record to conclude and hold that willful disobedience of order of this Court has occurred. 7. Petition is, therefore, disposed of. Judge |Hedau|