IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36258 of 2009 1. RANJEET KUMAR SINGH @ RANJEET SINGH S/O BAIJNATH SINGH VILL- LOHANIPUR, P.S. TEKARI, DISTT. GAYA 2. BAIJNATH SINGH @ BAIDYANATH SINGH S/O LATE DUDHESHWAR SINGH VILL- LOHANIPUR, P.S. TEKARI, DISTT. GAYA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. KUMARI MAMTA @ MAMTA @ MAMTA SINGH W/O RANJEET KUMAR SINGH D/O RAM PUKAR SINGH R/V LOHANIPUR, P.S. TEKARI, DISTT. GAYA AHD SHIBU COLONY, RAMGARH CANT. HAZARIBAGH, AT PRESENT RESIDENT OF MOHALLA BADKI DELHA, DULARGANJ, P.S. DELHA, DISTT. GAYA ----------- 2. 9.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are husband and the father-in-law apprehending arrest in a complaint case under Sections 307, 343, 323, 346, 498A and 504/34 of the Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Considering the submission of generalized allegations in a five years old marriage, let the petitioner no. 2 namely, Baijnath Singh @ Baidyanath Singh surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 1055/06. Let petitioner no. 1, stated to be the husband surrender within like period when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail for a period of six months only. 2 If during this period of six months or thereafter, the petitioner appears physically before the Court below and prays for regular bail, his application shall be considered on its own merits in light of the intervening development and respective attitude of the parties, without being prejudiced by the present order. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)