^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.No. 433 of 2007 Petitioner 6. 7. 8. Respondents 10. 11. 12. Versus 1. Usha Kiran Mahobe W/o P.K.Mahobe, aged about 30 years at Mahendranagar, Lalbag Housing Board Colony, Rajnandgaon. Pratibha Sahu D/o Ramkrishna Sahu, aged about 25 years, at Jailor Chal Chikhli, Ward No.8 Rajnandgaoh. Ajay Hazare S/o Deodas Hazare, aged about 25 years, at Sadhu Chal Tulsi, Rajnandgaon. Rajkumar Kakkad, S/o Bhupendra Kumar Kakkad, Aged about 29 years, at Janta colony, Lakhotil, Rajnandgaon. Prawin Kumar Awsankar S/o M.D.Awasankar, Aged about 30 years at Balderbag, Shuklachal Board No. 14, Rajnandgaon. Aswani Mohalya S/o Manharan Lal Mohalya, Aged about 28 years, at new Civil Line Qr. No. H-18 Rajnandgaon. Yashwant Dewangan S/o Pradep Dewangan, Aged about 24 years at Labarchal, Chikhali, Rajnandgaon. Lomesh Kumar Jaiswal, S/o R.C.Jaiswal, Aged about 23 years, at New Hospital Colony Rajnandgaon. Anurag Chandrakar S/o Thanendra Kumar Chandrakar aged about 27 years, . Manendranagar, Housing Board, Rajnandgaon. Tumanlal Dewangan, S/o Prakash Dewangan, Aged about 23 years at Labourchal Ward No.8 Rajnandgaon. Suresh Kumar Yadav, S/o Jagatram Yadav, Aged about 26 years at Manendranagar, Ward No.19 Rajnandgaon. Basant Kumar Verma, S/o Ghasia Verma, Aged about 36 years at Chikhali Ward No.3 Rajnandgaon. State Government of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Urban Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Chhattisgarh. District Urban Development Authority, (DUDA) Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. The Municipal Corporation, Through the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. Single Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Shri S. L. Kurmi, Advocate for the applicants. Shri Arvrind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents No. 1 85 2. ORDER (Passed on this 13th Day ofNovember, 2007) 1. I.A.No.l, application for condonation of delay in filing the application for restoration of W.P.(C) No. 2433/2007 (Usha Kiran Mahobe and others Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh & others). For the reasons stated in the application, it is ordered as prayed for. The delay in filing M.C.C. No. 433/2007 is condoned. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the counsel for the petitioners could not appear on account of bonafide mistake, therefore W.P.(C) No. 2433/2007, which was dismissed on 20.4.2007, be restored to its file. 3. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. W.P.(C) No. 2433/2007 be restored to the original file, subject to payment of a cost of Rs. 2000/- by the applicants, to the High Court Legal Aid Committee. . 4. A copy of this order be placed on record of W.P.(C) No. 2433/2007 and the same be listed for hearing. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur