IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1557 of 2011 Ravi Kumar, son of Rajesh Sharma, resident of Mohalla- Nauwagarhi, P.S.- Civil Lines, District- Gaya. ……..Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ………Opposite Party ---------------------------------- 2. 21.12.2011 The accused petitioner has preferred this revision application under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 against the order dated 17.11.2011 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, IV, Gaya in Cr. Appeal (Juvenile) No.46/2011/73/2011 by which the order dated 23.09.2011 passed by the learned Juvenile Justice Board, Gaya in Misc. Case No.18/2011 arising out of Civil Lines P.S. Case No.405/2010 under Sections 364A, 120 B and 302/201 of the I.P.C. has been confirmed and the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail has been dismissed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been declared a juvenile by the learned Juvenile Justice Board. His prayer for bail was rejected by the Juvenile Justice Board vide order dated 23.09.2011. Against the said order, the petitioner 2 preferred Cr. Appeal (Juvenile) No.46/2011/73/2011, which has been dismissed by the impugned order on the ground that if the petitioner is released, there is every possibility to mix with known criminal. He has further submitted that there is no material on record to draw such inference. He further submits that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.01.2011. Mrs. I.B. Pandey, learned counsel for the State could not controvert the contention of the petitioner while opposing the prayer of the petitioner. After hearing the learned counsel for both the parties and on perusal of the materials on record, it appears that the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is correct. Considering the facts and circumstances stated above, in my opinion, the impugned order is not fit to be sustained. The impugned order is set aside. The petitioner above-named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Juvenile Justice Board, Gaya in Misc. Case No.18/2011 arising out of Civil Lines P.S. Case No.405/2010 on the following terms and 3 conditions : (i) One of the bailors will be the father of the petitioner. (ii) Father of the petitioner will produce the petitioner in the court if and when required. (iii) The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence. (iv) In case of his absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the learned Juvenile Justice Board and he will be taken into custody. In the result, this application is allowed. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)