IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 236 of 2008 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 128 of 2008 Ms Gopika Chandrabhushan Saran And Anr. ..Applicants. Vs. M/s XLO India Ltd & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr P.J. Thorat i/b Mr M. K. Kochrekar, Advocate for the Applicants. Ms M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. Mr A. M. Chimalkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. DATED : 23.06.2008. DATED : 23.06.2008. DATED : 23.06.2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.P.P. for Respondent-State and learned counsel for Respondent No.1. 2. Perused the application and material available on record. 3. The applicants are seeking extension of a period of eight weeks granted by this Court vide order dated 29.4.2008. Prayer is strongly opposed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.1 contending that there is no justification for grant of extension. 4. The strong objection taken by the learned counsel for Respondent No.1 cannot be said to be an objection for the sake of opposition. The impugned order was passed by this Court on 29.4.2008. The Summer Vacation for the Apex Court commenced on 15.5.2008. By that time, it was open for the applicants to approach the Apex Court on the basis of authenticated copy, as was obtained by learned counsel for Respondent No.1. Even, during vacation, the matter could have been moved before the Apex Court, since the Vacation Bench in the Apex Court was available taking the urgent matters. The Applicants did not take either of the steps to get the matter listed before the Supreme Court. I am told as yet even S.L.P. has not been filed. 5. On the above factual backdrop, the Applicants have, now, approached this Court to seek extension of time. 6. The applicants, during the course of hearing, have filed affidavit/undertaking of Mr Gaurav Gautam Thakkar. The same is taken on record. 7. Having heard both parties, having taken overall view of the matter, by way of last chance the period to vacate the residential premises alredy granted vide order dated 29.4.2008 is further extended by another two weeks from today. Needless to mention that no further extension would be granted. 8. Application stands disposed of in terms of this order. (V.C. DAGA,J.) (V.C. DAGA,J.) (V.C. DAGA,J.)