Q'w HIGH CGURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 370 of 2009 PETITIONER : Smt Nirmala Tirkey‘D/o Late Sushi} Tirkey, aged about 41 years, AsstTeacher, Govt. Primary School Navapara, No1th Ambikapur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS :1. Staie of Chhattisgarh= Through Secretary School Education Depamnent Ministry D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2. The District Education Officer, Ambikapur, District Ambikapur (Sarguj a) Chhattisgarh. ‘3. The Block Education Ogicer, Ambikapur, District Ambikapur (Sarguga), Chhattisgarh. WRW PFTYTTON {NDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Prasent: Shri C..Iayant K Rao, Advocate for the petitioner. VERSUS Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondents. GRAL ORDER (Passed on 16d; day of February, 2009) With the consent of learned counsei appearing for the garties, the matter is heard finally. IA. No. 2. This is an application for taking documents on record. The application is ordered as prayed for. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to grant of two increments as she has obtained DEd. certificate. on her own expenses during the service period. Learned counsei further submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation to the authorities for grant of two increments pursuant to the judgment and order passed by this Court in the matter of Yashwam‘ Kamar Bharadwaj v. Municipal? Corporation, Durg and anotherl and W.?.(S.) No.4}30 of 2005, Gopesli Kumar Verma vs. The State Govt. qfChkattz‘sgarh cznciiaaothei‘. ,/ 1 2006 (n) warn CG 96 @é The State Government is under an obligation to foilow the law setiled by this Court and it is not necessary to approach this Court by each and every employee when the law has already been settled by this Court. The employees, who are similarly situated and have not approached the Court, may he treated at par with other employees, who have approached this Conn. lt is not necessary to approach this Court for similar order. In View of the foregoing reasons, this petition stands disposed of with liberty reserved to the petitioner, on the request of learned oounsei, to make a representation. Ifthe representation is filed by the petitioner, the same may be considered and decided, in accordance with law on its own merit as expeditiously as possible: preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date ofreceipt ofthe representation i t Sd/- y Satish K. Agnihotri Judge U!