HK3H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WraTPEnTIONYSlNo.3230of2i or PETtTIONER RESPONDENTS Arun Kumar Pandey, S/o Shri Ram Kumar Pandey, aged about 41 yeare. R/o Aamagohan, P.0. Khogswa, Bitepur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of ChhaUsgarh, Through Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director of Public Pensionbada. Raipur (C.G.) Instruction, Bablu WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CCTMSTITUTICTj OF INDIA SingleBench : Hon'ble Mr. JiKtice Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Mr. Kumaresh Tiwari, Advoeate for Sie petifioner. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel lawyer forthe respondente/State. ORDER passed on 1?" day bf June, M07) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the prtitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact and questton of taw involved In the present writ peUtion are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96), which has been dlsposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Leam«l cou»»el appearing /for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. 2. Accordingly, the writ petltton is allowed in temas of the order passed bi the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mwiicipal Corporatlon, Durg and another (Supra), subject to veriflcaUon of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed. Exaraination Certificate on his own expenses s®per the clrculaBs dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and (urther whether he has been paid two advsnce increments or not. No order as to costs. I ' Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge