HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2057 of 2007 Dated:06.02.2007 Between: Syed Mohammad Ali. …Petitioner. and The Chief Engineer, Hyderabad and others. …Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2057 of 2007 ORDER: The petitioner claims to have undertaken 5 items of works of diﬀerent categories, mentioned in the aﬃdavit. His grievance is that the bills for items 1, 2 and 4 were paid, whereas bills for items 3 and 5 (c and e) were not paid. On an earlier occasion, the petitioner ﬁled W.P.No.2008 of 2006 before this Court. The writ petition was disposed on 02.02.2006, directing the respondents to take necessary steps within two months from the date of receipt of the order. The grievance of the petitioner is that no action has been taken, in spite of the representations having been made. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings. The petitioner states that he did not receive any communication from the respondents, after this Court passed orders in W.P.No.2008 of 2006. Learned Government Pleader, however, placed a copy of the proceedings, dated 09.10.2006, indicating that the petitioner was paid the bills for the works done by him already, whereas he did not execute the items of works at serial numbers 3 and 5. Though it is stressed on behalf of the petitioner that such works were done by him, this Court cannot undertake any enquiry into such disputed questions of fact, in a writ petition. The respondents are directed to communicate the copy of the proceedings, dated 09.10.2006, to the petitioner and it shall be open to him to work out the remedies in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ Dt.06.02.2007 L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Note:Furnish C.C. in one week. (B/o) GJ