IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2009 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 36623 of 2009 (W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- ANNAKUTTY, AGED 60 YEARS, W/O. LATE MARKOSE, MUKLEL PUTHANPURAYIL, PAMPAKKUDA.P.O., MEMMURI VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.EGY.N.ELIAS SRI.GEORGE SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAMAMMANGALAM POLICE STATION, RAMAMANGALAM. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUTHENCRUZ POLICE STATION, PUTHENCRUZ. 3. T.D.RAJU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O. UNNIYTHI, KOLPARA, PAMPAKKUDA.P.O., NORTH PIRAMADAM, SECRETARY, TIMBER & GENERAL WORKERS UNION INTUC. 4. M.S. ONAPPAN, AGED ABOUT 60, S/O. SCARIA MANAKKAKALAYIL, SOUTH PIRAMADAM, PAMBAKKUDA, SECRETARY, TIMVER & GENERAL WORKERS UNION, CITU. 5. BENNY.V.U. AGED ABOUT 44, S/O. ULAHANNAN, VETTICHUVATTIL SOUTH PIRAMADOM, PAMPAKKUDA, SECRETARY, TIMBER & GENERAL WORKERS UNION, KTUC. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS ADV. SRI.K.S.ARUN KUMAR FOR R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 36623 of 2009 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: A TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT NO.4753780 ISSUED FROM MEMMURY VILLAGE OFFICE EXT.P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 11/12/2009 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 1/12/2009 IN W.P.(C).NO.33919/2009 /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T.RAVIKUMAR,JJ ------------------------------------------ W.P.(C). No.36623 of 2009 -------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December,2009 JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph.J The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “Issue a writ of mandamus appropriate writ or direction directing the respondents 1 and 2 to afford necessary police protection to life and property of petitioner and her workers and to afford necessary protection to cut and remove the rubber trees from the property having an extent of 1 Acre in Sy.No.933/2 of memmury Village”. As far as head load works are concerned, petitioner submits that she is prepared to engage workers attached to the unions in the locality. 2. Therefore the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to afford necessary protection to the petitioner to carry out the work of cutting trees with her own workers and for engaging workers offered by the respondents 3 to 5 for the head load works. In case no sufficient workers are available with the unions, it will be open to the petitioner to engage her own workers. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE C.T.RAVIKUMAR,JUDGE ssn