IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16785 of 2007 SATYA NARAYAN RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2/ 4/7/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In view of the statement made in paragraph-15 of the writ application that the petitioner has already availed his statutory alternative remedy before the statutory authority in terms of Rule-18 of the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teachers (Appointment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2006 any interference by this Court at this stage under Article-226 of the Constitution is clearly premature. The writ application is disposed with directions to the statutory authority to decide the representation of the petitioner after hearing all concerned, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )