( 1 ) cp97.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 97 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1837 OF 2010 Chhaya Bhausaheb Nisargandh .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Shri S.J. Salunke, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.B. Ghadge, A.G.P. for respondent/State. CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATED : 25.03.2011 P.C. :- 1. This Court while disposing of Writ Petition No. 1837 of 2010 issued directions to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to consider representation of the petitioner on its own merits and in accordance with law expeditiously and in any case within three months from the date of communication of the order. An affidavit in reply is presented by the Tahsildar, Kaij, wherein it has been recorded that the representation tendered by the petitioner has been decided on 26.05.2010 and ( 2 ) cp97.11 the communication containing the reasons for rejection of the claim is also transmitted to the petitioner. 2. In this view of the matter, this Contempt Petition needs no consideration and the same stands rejected. It would be open for the petitioner to adopt appropriate remedy available in law for mitigating her grievances. [R.M. BORDE, J.] snk/2011/MAR11/cp97.11