'pnpojd 93iy ueujnueH /ieMej6v |e~l !L|3uefeL|>| 'o/s 'SJQSA Sl7 ^noqe ps6e /|eMej6v |e~l ue^ey •s •(•c)-3) ^.fn6Jns ^u^Sja 'jndfejns /||!N 93'y u-iO /|eM^J6v pi?sejd e>|ueMQ 'o/s 'sjesA SS ^noqe p96^ /|eMeJ6vJe^A^Lu^y '17 "('S'D) efn6jns pu^sja 'jndfejns /II!N 9^'y 6uejfeg /|eMBj6v pueueLieiAl 'o/s 'sjesA s£ ^noqe ps6e /|BMej6v JBLunx Ljsaje|\| •£ ,,^ "('D'D) efnB-ins PU^SIQ 'jndfejns 'pnpojd 93iy eA^LU^4eH /|eMej6v ueAejeuAjLis 94e~l 'o/s 'sjesA 09 ^noqe p969 /|eM^J6v |e-] ueqoH •z ../ •(•9'3) Efn6jns 43U4SJQ 'jndfejns 'pnpojcj oj6y dsspues jo^udojd '|eMej6v pUBLj39>|ei 346-1 -0/S 'SJBSA S^ 4noqe pa6e |£Mej6v-l^Lun>f pouiA 'T ..^ ^¥^^ 't'^S.. I '^V^i S <^t ll^S %?^s .-r ^i^' t^' ^}- ^'•-' Sy3NOIlI13d OTOZ/ ^ ^ ^ ^ON^ NOIlI13d IDdM HBV5SI11VHH3 ....b> .'...^ yndsviia iv a^nivDianrjo lynoo HSiH^Hn\fT v 'l^yi ir^) ^ RESPONDENTS Bishrampur, District Surguja (C.G.) 6. Neeraj Mittal, aged 30 years, S/o Pawan Kumar Agrawal, Mittal Rice Mill, Surajpur District ^ Surguja (C.G.) 7. Niraj Garg, aged about 32 years, S/o Shri G.D. GardgShri Ram Krishna Agro, Ambikapur, District . Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS 1.* State of Chhattisgarh through- Secretary, Food and Civil Suppliers, D.K.S. Bhawan, „ Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. B.R. Rathor, S.D.M. Ramanujganj, District Surguja (C.G.) 3. M.S. Tahkur, S.D.M. Wadrafnagar, District Surguja (C.G.) ^"" 4. The Collector, Food Department, Surguja (C.G.) 5. " P.L. Hansha, Asstt. Food Officer, Ramanujganj, District Surguja ^ (C.G.) 6. Santosh Kumar, Food Inspector, Wadrafnagar, District Surguja ^ (C'G>) 7. S.O. police Station, Basantpur, District Surguja (C.G.) i l^. ^ ^a'e litll^i WRIT PETmQNJJNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmJTIOM OF INDIA. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARM AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (Cr.) No. 4971 of2010 PETITIONER8 : Vinod Kumar Agrawal & Others. VERSU8 RESPONDENT8 : StateofChhattisgarh&Others. WRITpETIHQN,mDERAR'nCLE,226PFTHECON8TITUI10NOF^W^ 8B: Hon'ble Siiri Satish K. Agiuhotn, J, Present: 2. 3. 4. Shri D.R-Shamia, Senior Advocate with Smt. Ram Patiiak, Advocate fbr the petitioners. , 1:' Shii P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondcnt No. 1- 4 and 7. QHDER(QRAL) (Passed on 08th day of Septsmber, 2010) I^amed counsel appearing for the petitioners, 011 mstmctions, secks permission of ttiis Court to withdraw this petition "mth liberty to take appropriate steps that may be available to the petitioners under the provisions oflaw. Leamed counsel appearmg for other side has no objection. It is ordered accordmgly. Coiisequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the atbrestated liberty, ifso advised. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ainit