IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18543 of 2011 Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Munshi, S/O-Bhola Vishwakarma Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03 04.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 17.01.2011 in connection with Baroon P.S. Case No. 13 of 2011 registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is named in the first information report and some witnesses also claimed to have identified the petitioner committing the alleged crime. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is Munshi at the brickkiln of one Sunil Singh who had some dispute with his partner namely, Kuldip Singh and, as a matter of fact, the name of this petitioner has been dragged in this case at the behest of aforesaid Kuldip Singh. It is further contended by him that petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent which has specifically been averred in Para-9 of this petition. No doubt, informant as well as some witnesses claimed to have identified the petitioner at the time of the alleged occurrence and it is an admitted position that petitioner was well-known to the informant and other witnesses prior to the alleged occurrence but it is surprising enough that a known person had gone to commit theft without covering his face. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as 2 well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Baroon P.S. Case No. 13 of 2011. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)