(1) wp4692-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4692 OF 2011 Satish Ramdas Jathar PETITIONER VERSUS Union of India and another RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. K.S. Bhore, advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Alok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. ..... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 27th SEPTEMBER, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner for directions to the respondents to conduct his interview as per the application submitted by the petitioner. The petitioner has been found to be ineligible for being called for the interview on the ground that the Residence Certificate issued to him is not in the prescribed format. 2. It appears that a Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No. 2380/2010, vide order (2) wp4692-11 dated 29th April, 2010, has observed that the Petroleum Company must prescribe the format of the Residence Certificate in the advertisement itself to avoid any complications. Accordingly, in the advertisement itself, in the present case, Appendix-C provides for the format in so far as the Residence Certificate is concerned. We have perused the Residence Certificate granted in favour of the persons who have been short-listed. The said Certificate is in the prescribed format. Admittedly, the Residence Certificate issued in favour of the petitioner is not in the prescribed format. In that view of the matter, no case is made out to grant any relief in this petition. Hence, the petition is rejected. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] npj/wp4692-11