IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1230 of 2006 DEVENDRA SINGH @ AMRENDRA SINGH & ORS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 21.7.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioners. This Court would not find any error in the impugned order refusing to implead the petitioners as party to the suit or substitute in place of the original plaintiff when a categorical finding has been arrived at by the Court below that the petitioners are not appropriate party. For arriving such findings, the Court below has gone into the averments made in the plaint and has also examined the rights emanating to the settlee and has come to a conclusion that such right was not available to the persons whose interest was sought to be represented by the petitioners. The approach of the Court below in fact cannot be faulted when the petitioners being the sons or brothers had not even disclosed the date of death of their father or brothers whom they wanted to substitute. In that view of the matter, this Court does not find any merit in this civil revision application and the same is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)