,.s€maa%. s. ,.s-a> '4 y&cs^ "TS? '^ll'ill'rt'y, s?ti1<H'is, rs«niyy,< W<IP(I a>*iien 3^1 '<^v (1pf3^?) an^(qi[1%;lN? •renwBftBSii^i W.P. (s) PETITIONER RESPONbENTS (Petition U/A 226 Smt. Aja^ 42 years, Superintet Circle: (C£)Pin:4t Versus 1. State Secre1( Mantn 2. The Eri Resourl (C6) 3. The Deparl Shanko 4. The Projed Bastar Present: Mr. N. Naha Roy, Adv.for the petitio Mr. A. Sao, 6ovt. Advocate for the 29.09.2008 q;raf?pfrT iipraf'? 1^A'rf^n ^sifimaii^ii o.5459/2008 Constitution of India) ti Nag, W/o Shri K.R. Nag, aged about working as Assistant Srade-III, O/o iding Engineer Indrawati Project, mharpara, Jagdalpur, t5istt: Bastar •4001 of Chhattisgarh, through : the tary, Department of Water Resources, lay, tS.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C6) ^ineer-in-Chief, Department of Water :es, Sihava Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur fhief Engineer, Mahanadi, Project, |nent of Water Resources, SRP Chowk, Nagar Road, Raipur (C6) iuperintending Engineer, ~ Indrawati Circle Kumharpara, Jagdalpur, Distt. tC6) ler. ate. 3Tm^r?^r T, rRITCWT —FS/)t)7—3Q008 —40,000. -^. ^ i Fi ^y SD^I W ftlif •(PITSII^TsOTTO *-u ais^s»l -ysf ^lAjld'4, ESTfly'lii, ^cll'My '*n*i<ni (nii'w STI^T T^? ('pla'i^) 3(1^1 +wf<'l<i)-1 ^WdTtfft'^'rf3!^" •^aifgiT 3(1^1 ^'sinre^ite iner is praying for a direction to the respondents to consider and r41ease the annual increments of the petitioner w.e.f. 10.7.1991 i.e. one ^ear after her joining. Learned counsel for the pe^itioner submits that he is not pressing this petition at this stage, howeve^, the petitioner may be given liberty to make detailed representation tjefore the competent authority of respondent No.l for r-edr-essal of lijer grievances, to which lear-ned counsel for the respondents has no objecti^n. In view of the above submis^ion of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of i^/ith liberty to the petitioner to make a detailed representation raising all her grievances raised in this petiti'on along with copy of this order ^efore the competent authority of respondent No.l within 15 days fr^m today and on sych representation being made, the competent authorify of respondent No.l shall decide the same on its own merits in accordaitce uvith law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months) from the date of receipt of the representation. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge aiBifiq ^S gCTTcBT, tmRTTiiT —F.S/197—3/2008 —40,000.