IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 26TH BHADRA 1931 LA.App..No. 638 of 2004(D) ----------------------------------- LAR.80/1997 of SUB COURT, MANJERI .................... APPELLANT(S): SUPPLEMENTAL 2ND RESPONDENT ------------------------ THE AIRPORT DIRECTOR, AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA, CALICUT AIRPORT, P.O.CALICUT AIRPORT. BY MR. N.SUGUNAPALAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANT AND 1ST RESPONDENT -------------------------- 1. PUTHIYAKATH SAIDALAVI, S/O. IBRAHIM, NEDIYIRUPPU, P.O.MELANGADI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM. R1 BY ADV. MR.BABU S. NAIR R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.BASANTH BALAJI THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/09/2009, ALONG WITH LAA. NO.1001 OF 2004 AND CONNECTED CASES THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON IA. NO.3080/2004 IN LAA. NO 638 /2004 DISMISSED 17/09/2009 SD/- PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE SD/- K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------------------ L.A.Appeal Nos. 638, 1001, 1002, 1003,1005 and 1008 of 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 17th day of September, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose,J. These appeals are preferred by the Calicut Airport. The percentage of enhancement granted under the impugned judgment is 44.59% over what was awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. We do not find any warrant for interference since it is brought to our notice that in other matters pertaining to the same acquisition, this Court has approved enhancement up to 45%. The appeals will stand dismissed. No costs. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE css/