C482 911/2011 Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Mr. Pramod Bahuguna, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Arvind Vashistha, Advocate, for the C.B.I. Having heard learned Counsel for the parties, it comes out that chargesheet has been filed against the applicant for the offence of Section 419, 420, 468, 467, 471, 120B IPC. Though learned Counsel for the applicant argued that the role of the applicant, being an Advocate on the panel of the bank, was limited only to issue a non- encumbrances certificate of the property. But the entire investigation reveals that the applicant was involved in a criminal conspiracy because documents of the property, in question, were forged. This Court does not find any cogent reason to admit the petition, and the same is dismissed at the threshold. (Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) 30.9.2011 Prabodh