FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION No. 9892 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 19146 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION No. 10798 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 19150 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION No. 10797 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 19140 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION No. 10798 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 19150 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION No. 9894 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 19148 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION No. 10799 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 19152 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. R.C. Patil, Advocate for applicants in all Civil Applications Mrs. R.K. Ladda, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 in all Civil Applications Mrs. Chaitali Kutti, Advocate for respondent No. 3 bin all Civil Applications ............................. CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 8th October, 2010 PER COURT : 1. These are the applications filed by the claimants for condonation of delay. The claimants had filed reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, which came to be partly allowed. It is the contention of the claimants / present applicants that they are laborers, they were not residing in the town and they had to move from one place to another for their livelihood. Even they had to go to forest for collecting the forest produce and selling them. As they were required to move from one place to another, they could not get knowledge about the Judgment and Decree passed by the Reference Court and because of the same, delay has been caused. Though the respondents have opposed the application, but there is no affidavit denying the contentions raised by the defendants. Taking into account, the reasons stated in the application the delay is condoned. The Civil Applications are allowed. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE SDM 9892.09CA