CW 7339/09 (1) In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan At Jaipur Bench, Jaipur O R D E R In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7339/2009 Bajrang Lal and others Vs. The Civil Judge (Junior Division), Khetri and another Date of Order :: 29th July,2009 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jitendra Ray Goyal Mr. Arvind Kumar Pareek, for petitioners. ....... By the Court :- This writ petition under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned order dated 1/5/2009 passed by the Executing Court by which the application filed by the petitioner-judgment debtor under section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short CPC) seeking amendment in the orders dated 28/8/2008 and 3/9/2008 has been dismissed. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. It was inter alia contended that the application filed by the decree holder-respondent for further clarification in regard to the decree which was passed on the basis of compromise was dismissed by the Executing Court on 19/5/2005 and the writ petition filed by the decree holder against the said order has also been dismissed by this Court, hence, the CW 7339/09 (2) Executing Court was not competent to pass the order in regard of clarifying the terms of decree and therefore the petitioner rightly moved the application for amending the said orders which was wrongly dismissed. 4. I have considered the submissions in the light of the impugned order and other relevant orders placed on the record. It is not disputed that a decree was passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Khetri in Civil Suit No.97/88 on 20/9/2000 on the basis of compromise arrived at in between the parties. From the perusal of different orders passed by the Executing Court, it appears that trial court is not exercising its powers beyond its scope and jurisdiction but only executing decree passed by the trial court which is final in nature. The objection filed by the judgment debtor under section 47 of CPC has already been dismissed and that order was also upheld by this Court. I do not find any illegality or perversity in the impugned order passed by the Executing Court on the application filed under section 151 of CPC which is virtually an application seeking review of the orders of the Executing Court dated 28/8/2008 and 3/9/2008. 5. Consequently, this writ petition is dismissed. (J.R. Goyal),J. VS Shekhawat/- Jr. P.A. D39