IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6788 of 2011 MADHABI DEVI, wife of Shambhu Sah, resident of vill.-Bhitea, P.S.- Fullidumar, Distt.-Banka---------------Petitionmer. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, Banka. 5. The District Superintendent of Education, Banka. 6. The Block Development Officer, Fullidumar, District-Banka(Bihar) 7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Fullidumar, District-Banka 8. The Mukhiya, gram Panchayat Raj Bhitia Block-Fullidumar, Distt.- Banka(Bihar). 9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Bhitia, Block Fullidumar, Distt.-Banka.--------------------------------------------------------Respondents. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. N. K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Vijay Anand, Advocate For the State : Mr. R. Raman, G.P.-23 Mr. Sunil Kumar, A.C. to G.P.-23 ---------- 2. 20.4.2011 This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner against the inaction of the respondents-authorities for not issuing appointment letter to the petitioner for the post of Panchayat Teacher under backward category in Bhitia Panchayat under the District Banka in terms of orders passed by the District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Banka, Bihar. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Banka, had given a direction to the respondent nos.6,7,8 and 9 to examine whether any other person has been appointed as Panchayat Teacher having obtained lesser marks than the petitioner herein. Operative portion of the direction of the District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Banka, is extracted below : 2 Þvr%muksDr rF;ksa ds vkyksd esa fu;kstu bdkbZ xzke iapk;r &fHkfr;k dks funsZ” fn;k tkrk gS fd jathr dqekj dk fu;kstu voS/k <ax ls QthZ izek.k i= ds vk/kkj ij fd;k x;k FkkA vr% budk fu;kstujn~n fd;k tkrk gS ftyk f”{kk v/kh{kd] ckadk ds i=kad 1674 fnukad 30-8-08 ls Li"V gksrk gS fd iq:"kksre dqekj iIiw dk fu;kstu vukjf{kr in ij fd;k tkrk FkkA vr% iq:"kksre dqekj iIiw dk jathr dqekj ;kno ds LFkku ij dkWmUlsfyax dj ,oa dkxtkrksa dh tkWp dj fu;kstu dh tk; ,oa euksjatu dqekj dk dkmUlsfyx dj fu;kstu iq:"kksre dqekj ds LFkku ij fd;k tk;A lkFk gh fu;kstu bdkbZ xzke iapk;r fHkfr;k dks funsZ” fn;k tkrk gS fd ek/koh nsoh dk vkosnu Nku&chu dj izkir djsaA izkir vkosnu ds QyLo:i ;fn buls de es/kk vad okys dk fu;kstu fd;k x;k gks rks vkosfndk ek/koh nsoh dk dkmUlsfyax dj lHkh dkxtkrksa dh tkWp dj fu;kstu fd;k tk;AÞ According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, direction has not been acted upon by respondent nos.6,7,8 and 9. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, it would suffice if a direction is issued to the respondent nos.6.7.8 and 9 to consider the case of the petitioner in terms of the direction issued by the District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Banka. This Court orders accordingly. With the above observation this writ petition is disposed of. Sudip ( T. Meena Kumari, J.)