HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S.APPA RAO Civil Revision Petition No.3109 of 2004 Date: 27-8-2011 Between Habeeb Bee and 6 others … Petitioners/Appellants/ Plaintiffs and Mekala Hanumantha Rao and 7 others … Respondents/Respondents/ Defendants HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S.APPA RAO Civil Revision Petition No.3109 of 2004 Order: This civil revision petition is filed being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 20-11-2003 in C.M.A.No.41 of 2002 on the file of the II Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Khammam, confirming the order and decree dated 01-10-2002 in I.A.No.1034 of 2002 in O.S.No.533 of 2002 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Khammam. 2. The revision petitioners herein are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.533 of 2002. They filed I.A.No.1034 of 2002 in the said suit under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of C.P.C., for temporary injunction restraining the respondents-defendants and their men from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the petition schedule property. After due enquiry, the trial Court as well as the lower appellate Court negatived the contentions of the petitioners. Being aggrieved, the present civil revision petition is filed. 3. The concurrent finding of both the Courts below is that unless there is a full-pledged trial in O.S.No.69 of 1996 determining the rights of the parties, injunction cannot be granted in favour of the petitioners. 4. As seen from the impugned judgment, the petition schedule property is only Ac.0-30 guntas in Survey No.88/C, situated at Pakabanda Bazar, Khammam and as per Exs.A-6 and A-7, the total extent is Ac.2-27 gts. It is an admitted fact that the land in Survey No.88/C was originally belonged to one late Shaik Khaja Miya and a suit was filed in the year 1996 and the same is pending for consideration. It is also a fact that the respondents are claiming that they are in possession and enjoyment of the petition schedule property under registered sale deeds obtained from one Ponnam Murali, General Power of Attorney Holder of the said Khaja Miya. 5. In view of the concurrent finding of both the Courts below and as rightly requested by the learned counsel for the petitioners and in view of long pendency of the suit, it is a fit case where a direction is to be given to the trial Court for expeditious disposal of the suit. 6. In the result, the civil revision petition is disposed of, directing the trial Court to dispose of the suit O.S.No.533 of 2002 in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, after giving an opportunity to both the parties. No costs. ___________________ K.S.APPA RAO, J. 27th August, 2011. Ak HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S.APPA RAO Civil Revision Petition No.3109 of 2004 27th August, 2011. (Ak)