c,^ Ve-o-0 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.S No^\ /2011 PETITIONERS: / 1. Yashwant Singh Thakur, Aged about32 years, S/o Shri Khedan Singh, R/o Ward no. 17 Municipal Corporation Mahasamund, District - Mahasamund(C.G.) c/ ^ /^^ -^ ..< <li'.^^/ N' ^ ^^ ^•/y' ^. A ^ ^ ^^ <l- / 2. Ram Kumar Sahu, Aged about 41 years, S/o Shri Paras Ram Sahu, R/o Waid no. 6, Municipal Corporation Mahasamund, District -Mahasamund (C.G.) ,/ 3. Om Prakash Chandrakar, Aged about 31 years, S/o Shri Ramanand Chandrakar, R/o Ward no. 13, Miu-ucipal Corporation Mahasamund, Disfa-ict - Mahasamiind (C.G.) / 4. Devendra Kuinar Sahu, S/o Shri Jagdish Sahu, Aged about 28 years, R/o Ward no. 13, Municipal CorporationMahasamund, District - Mahasamund (C.G.) / 5. Hemsingh Dhruv, S/o Purshottam Singh Dhruv, Aged about 31 years, R/o Ward no. 18, Municipal Corporation Mahasamund, Dista'ict - Mahasamund (C.G.) ^ 6. Om Frakash Kesharwani, S/o Shri Udhoshayam Kesharwani, Aged about 32 years, R/o Ward No. 01, Municipal Corporation Mahasamund, Disfa-ict - Mahasamund (C.G.) 1 --yw- -—^sr.r*'' / 7. DUip Chouhan, S/o Shri Sanoram Chouhan, Aged about 30 years, R/o Ward No. 03, Miinicipal Corporation Mahasamiind District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ^ 8. Goverdhan Dhruv, S/o Shri Mehattar Dhruv, AgedaboutSl years, R/o Gram- Parsada, Mahasamund, Dista-ict - Mahasamiuid (C.G.) /9. NemmiBegum,D/oShriShekhAhmad, Aged about 40 years R/o Ward no. 05, Municipal Corporation Mahasamund, District - Mahasamund (C.G.) RESPONDENTS: 1. -10. Lakhan Yadav, S/o Late Shri Jodhan Yadav Aged aabout 50 years, R/o- Ward No.17, Municipal Corporation Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through the Prindpal Secretary Department of Urban Adnunistration and Development Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Under Secretary Department of Urban Admirdstration and Development Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) ifcer'"""' ^ocaw ^b -/3. Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Corporation, Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROFRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS Fwa»53~as..—_ .^ ^-^k^ <w^ »RITPETITION (S^ N0.17110F^011 Versus Yashwant Singh Thakur & Others State of Chhattisaarh & Others iT PETITION UNDER ARTSCLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTION OF INDiA (S3 : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) kresent:- Shri Saurabh Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the State. (Passed on 30'" day of March, 2011) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly and fairiy submit that the issue involved in the present petition as well as in Vlrendra Das Manikpuri & Others v. The State of Chha sgarti & Others whieh was cQnsideredand decided by this Court on 10.02.2011, are iderrtical. Thus, the instant petition is squarely co'/ered by the order passed by this court in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Othsrs . in view of the submissfon made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, this petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others . Satish K. Agnihotri ^ asnok W.P.(S) No. 7450 of 2010, declded on 10.02.2011