CS(OS) No.703/2007 Page 1 of 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) No.703/2007 % Date of Decision: 18.03.2009 M/s.S.K.Polymers …. Plaintiff Through Mr.Ajay Singh, Advocate. Versus M/s.Icon Cables Ltd …. Defendant Through Mr.Vikas Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR 1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? YES 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NO ANIL KUMAR, J. * IA No.3653/2009 This is an application by the parties, plaintiff and the defendant for passing a decree in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties. Under the settlement the defendant has paid a sum of Rs.4 lakhs by banker’s cheque No.047758 dated 6th March, 2009 drawn on HDFC Bank, New Friends Colony, New Delhi which cheque has since been encashed. The learned counsel for the plaintiff on instructions states that the banker’s cheque has since been encashed and the plaintiff company has received Rs.4 lakhs. The said amount of Rs.4 lakhs has been paid in full and final settlement of all the claims of the plaintiff in CS(OS) No.703/2007 Page 2 of 2 the suit. The learned counsel for the defendant also states that on receipt of Rs.4 lakhs in full and final settlement of all the claims of the plaintiff, no amount is due from defendant to the plaintiff. The application is signed by plaintiff and on behalf of defendant company and is also supported by the affidavit of Sh.Karanjit Juneja, partner of the plaintiff and Sh.P.K.Raizada, authorized signatory of the defendant company. The application is also signed by the respective counsel for the parties. There does not seem to be any impediment in allowing the application. Consequently, the application is allowed. CS(OS) No.703/2007 The parties have settled the dispute and in the settlement of dispute an amount of Rs.4 lakhs has been paid by the defendant to the plaintiff in full and final settlement of all the claims of the plaintiff against the defendant company. Consequently, the suit of the plaintiff stands satisfied. The suit is disposed of as satisfied. Parties are left to bear their own cost. All the pending applications are also disposed of. MARCH 18, 2009 ANIL KUMAR, J. “K”