Crl.M. No. M- 32834 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M- 32834 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 2.12.2010 ... Gurbachan Singh ................Petitioner vs. State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Raj Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner Sh. Sudhir Nehra, Additional Advocate General, Punjab ... K.C. Puri, J. As per allegation of the prosecution, the petitioner is a marginal witness of Power of Attorney of Piare Lal, which is stated to have been obtained by taking his signatures on blank paper. The name of the petitioner does not appear in the FIR. He is stated to be of 80 years. The signatures of Piare Lal are stated to appear on the Power of Attorney. So, without going into the merits, it is a fit case to allow the concession of anticipatory bail, to petitioner- Gurbachan Singh. Accordingly the application for anticipatory bail stands allowed subject to the following conditions:- Crl.M. No. M- 32834 of 2010 -2- i) that the petitioner shall join the investigation, as and when required by the police. ii)that the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence; and iii)that the petitioner shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. ( K.C. Puri ) 2.12.2010 Judge chugh