: 1 : wp.6397.2011 vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6397 OF 2011 Sudhir R. Gore & anr. .. Petitioners V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.V.S. Talkute for the Petitioners Mr.Vijay Patil, GPfor the Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 3 CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED: SEPTEMBER 7, 2011 P.C.: 1. We have heard Mr.Talkute, the learned Counsel for the petitioner. By the impugned communication dated 3.3.2010 addressed to the Headmaster, the Special District Social Welfare Officer, Satara District has only called for the record and after the exercise is completed for fixation of the payscale, the petitioner’s liberty to challenge the same is not taken away if they are aggrieved and it is expected that the District Social Welfare Officer will complete the exercise expeditiously. We do no find any case to show our indulgence at this stage despite the fact that our attention has been invited to an order passed by this Court on 3.5.2011 in a group of writ petitions. 2. Writ petition is rejected as premature. (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.)