.}' ^. ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRrTPETmONfQ No. 4001 of2009 Sadmddin Tharani S/o Hasam Bhai Tharani, aged aboirt 69 years, R/o Old Bus Stand, Durg, Tahsil& Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretaty, Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Commissioner, Durg Division, Tahsil & Distt. Durg (C.G.) 3. The Nazul Officer, Durg, Talisil & Distt. Durg (C.G.) WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTmiON OF INDIA SB: Hon'bIeShri Satish K.Asnihotri, J. Present: Shri Gautam Bhaduri, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, GoveniiTient Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDERrORAL) (Passed on 31st day of July, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on mstructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits, however, the respondent authorites may kindly be directed to consider and decide his represeritatioii, expeditiously. 2. Shri Sao, leamed counsel appearmg forthe State/respondents submits fhat in the event, a iresh representatiorfis filed by the petitioner before the authorities concemed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period ofsix weeks fromthe date ofreceipt ofthe representation. 3. In view ofthe foregoing, accordingto Stoi Bhaduri, nothing sur^ives for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, fhe petition staads disposed of |i Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Aimt