IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 102 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 28 OF 2008 SHRI. VAMAN JANU VELIP PRESENTLY IN JAIL THROUGH SHIVANAND VELIP ... Applicant Versus SHRI. ARVIND PURANIK AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. P. A. Kamat, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Neelesh Takkekar, Advocate for respondent No.1. Coram:- S.A. BOBDE, J. Date:- 24th April, 2008 P.C. It appears that the parties have settled the dispute between them while the applicant was in prison. 2. The applicant has, in pursuance of the settlement, filed this application for compounding the offence. The learned Counsel for respondent No.1 i.e. the complainant, does not dispute the contents of this application. The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that in pursuance of an agreement drawn between the parties, the amount has been paid to his client and he has has no objection to the offence being compounded. Hence, this application for compounding is allowed. The orders of conviction by the Courts below are, hereby, set aside and the applicant-accused is directed to be released forthwith from the Sub-Jail, Sada, Vasco da Gama, if not wanted in any other case. Application disposed of. S.A. BOBDE, J. ssm.