IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34912 of 2010 RAM KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 19.01.2011 Vide order dated 22.12.2010, petitioner was granted bail wherein it was recorded “if the petitioner deposits the so called defalcated amount”, he shall be enlarged on bail. The present matter has been listed again under the heading “to be mentioned” because the court below is insisting on deposit of the defalcated amount though the same has been already deposited earlier. Let it be clarified that the Court directed the petitioner to only furnish the evidence of the deposit which has already made and not to insist on deposit afresh. With the above clarification the said matter is disposed of with the direction to the court below shall not to insist on deposit of fresh amount but only evidence of deposit as is being insisted upon by the court below, according to the petitioner. Let this order along with copy of the earlier 2 order dated 22.12.2010 be communicated to the concerned court by FAX. The time is further extended by four weeks. Anjani/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)