1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MCA NO. 160 OF 2007 WITH STAMP NUMBER (APPLN) NO.2718 OF 2006 IN W.P. NO.191/2001 Suryakant Naik .. Applicant. Versus Suryaji Narayan Amonkar & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. Sudin Usgaonkar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. P. S. Lotlikar,Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4. CORAM :- U. D. SALVI, J. DATE : 26 th February, 2010. P.C. : Heard. Perused application. It appears that the applicant/ petitioner did approach his Advocate to inform about the death of the respondent. However, the communication gap remained between the two as he could not meet his Advocate on the date of his visit for communicating the demise of the respondent and the fact remained to be communicated on account of loss of memory thereafter. Ends of Justice would be served, if the permission is granted to bring L.Rs. of the deceased respondent No.2 on record. Delay is condoned. Abatement of Writ petition is set 2 aside. Permission is granted to bring L.Rs. of the deceased respondent No.2 on record. Cause title of the petition be amended accordingly. M.C.A. No.160/2007 and Stamp Number Application 2718/2006 are disposed of accordingly. U. D. SALVI, J. SMA