B.^^^^fi^Bsaji3^^E^^S^i^i^^^ k^: T'^-' 6. 11 'T-' SibglB-Bencft ^) INTHEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. <S) ,., \ WMT PETITION No. ^t^^6 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER .--'^'.."' \^-^prx c^^-^- ..-" ^^ ^y y RESPONDENTS // >•< ('iyfc .-s,-" '^ A<p Bhola Shankar Tiwari, S/o, late Shri Heera Lal Tiwari , aged' about 46 years, R/o. Saraipali, Tahsil Saraipali, District- Mahasamund (C.G.), VERSUS 1) State of Chhattisgarh, Actin^ through Secretaiy, School Education, Department, DKS Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2) Collector-' Dista-ict^Mahasamund 3) District Education Officer, Mahasamund (C.G.) 4) Head Master, Government Primary School, Lukapara, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) •.t^'S^CSi'K^KsiiS^Sg^Ba .^ 2 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS. ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS etc. XI-HC-78 «Wttia»*<i<sfi 3^'qFIRTq', «t(1u'IS,Rlf11«y ^.^f.-.^?r?^J.t'.b. ^TTSF ••?•••••••••.•(•••"••• ^200 <z gn^?r iraw (yit^aii^aT) sn^TwR-ii* (raT3[I^Tsl?H v '£. ST<nwflf?cT3n^T 14-8-2006 Shri M.K. Smha, coimsel Siat. Anju Ahuja, Depi^ respondents, on advance copy. Heard bofh the counsel. By the instant petition, ttansfer order Aanexure-P/3 petitioner has been Bokaramudakhurd, Bagh. The luain grievaaGe of traasferred showing that the request of the petitioner requested for his transfer, transferred on wrong ground. Leamed counsel for petitioner niay be aUowed to nj anonialy to the notice of respc| decide fhe same, to which coi objection. Havio^ heard tearaed to the facts aad circumstaiices any opiuion on the inerit of make a detailed representation and annexiires to respondent N1 today and ia tum, respondent of the petitioner within a period thle «til'i|ff1'lfl-ft<|t|d1'ft'fWI'(l»l'%l(, ^sri^TTsn^T - for fhe petitioner. <y Govt. Advocate for the State/ [fhc petitioner has challenged tus dated 7-7-2006 whereby the tr4asferred fioia Saraipali to t|ie petitioner is that he Iias been traasfer has been made on tlie w4ereas, the pctitioner had never fl|ierefore, the petitioner has been t4e pctitioner submitted fhat the (ake a representation bringmg ttiis ipcjndent No.l and hc be directed to jinsel for fhe respondents Iias no coijinsel for fhe pardes, having regard \>t the case, and wifhout expressing case, the petitioner is allowed to along wifh a copy of ttus petition \>. 1 wifhia a period of 10 days &oai ). 1 shall decide the representation of30 days fioin the date ofreceipt P.T.O. llTo B£ IS^'^. «ra XI-HC-78 3'c^^fraTcra', ssTnu'is, Ri'iiuy *TTH^n Sfi^lcfr Wf. 200 3TI^?T'ra3T ('^rf3g^8T) sn^r w R-iicb (WT sn^?r st>Hi* Barve ^ ^s. ^ t3 ®RIRR^f?<T3fI^r -^ of fhe representatioa, after con; petitioiier, ia accordance with In the meaatime, fhe efR order in respect of fhe petitic representation ofthe petitioner Wifti fhe direction aforesa Consequently, M.(W.)P. of. Parties are entitled for L^idering all the points raised by the Nw. (ct and operation of fhe impugned (^ner shaU Bemain staycd, tiB the i|s decided. .a^d, the petition stands disposed of, .3283/2006 also stands disposed Nb cerjified copy ofthis order. +iii?cf4)-) wRft' ff r.sifl <iai<^i< ^ta^HSTI^W ^°° ^y^ P.T.O. .'o'"