IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.7408 of 2011 Saurav Kumar, S/o Rajni Ranjan Chodhary. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Kashyap, Adv. For the State : Mr. R.B. Roy “Raman”, APP. ------------- 05. 15.09.2011 Supplementary-affidavit filed today be kept on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 396 was added. The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 25.11.2010 since he had been seen fleeing away from the place of occurrence. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail on the ground that five witnesses have been examined and none of them had named the petitioner. It has been submitted by learned APP that in fact it was the injured/deceased who had disclosed the name of the petitioner as one of the participants of the crime. Considering the same, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is once again rejected. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)