THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO.883 OF 2010 DATED: 01-02- 2011. Between Vemuri Bujji. … Appellant And 1.The Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Department, Guntur and another …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO.883 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: This appeal is filed against the award, dated 16-08-2010, in O.A.No.77 of 2006 on the file of the A.P. Endowments Tribunal at Hyderabad, whereunder and whereby the O.A. filed by the respondents herein was allowed directing the appellant herein to vacate and handover the schedule premises to the respondents, else to vacate him with police aid and deliver possession of the same to the 2nd respondent herein. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant contended that by virtue of Ex.R1, the appellant is in possession of the property and therefore, he cannot be evicted. 3. No document is filed to show that in what capacity the appellant is in possession and enjoyment of the property. Ex.R1-bunch of electricity bills and Municipal Tax receipts at best would go to show that he is in possession of the property. A categorical finding has been recorded by the Endowments Tribunal basing on the evidence of P.W.1 coupled with Exs.P3 to P9 that temple is the owner of the property and the said finding is not shown to be perverse or incorrect. As a matter of fact, the appellant herein also gave an undertaking letter as long back as in the year 1991 to vacate the petition schedule property, but he has not done so. Therefore, he has no right or title to remain in the property of the temple and squat on the property as he likes. The trial Court rightly allowed the application and absolutely, there are no grounds to interfere with the same. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. -------------------- K.C.BHANU, J DATED:01-02- 2011 Hsd