IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 6600 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 5.3.2009 Mukand Singh and another ....Petitioners Versus Ranjit Singh and another ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Sachin Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. RAJESH BINDAL J **** The challenge in the present petition is to the order passed by learned Court below whereby in an application filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC by the respondents/plaintiffs, the petitioners/defendants have been restrained from interfering in the possession of the respondents/plaintiffs and the petitioners/defendants have been restrained from alienating/dispossessing the suit property in any manner whatsoever. The respondents/plaintiffs filed a suit for permanent injunction claiming themselves to be co-owner in joint possession of the suit property. Interim stay was granted by the trial Court which was upheld by the learned Lower Appellate Court by recording a specific finding that in the Jamabandi for the year 2003-2004 and also Khasra Girdawari for the crop Sauni, 1999 to Harri 2004 the respondents/plaintiffs have been recorded to be in continuous possession of the land in dispute. It is on this basis that during the pendency of suit the possession of the respondents/plaintiffs had been directed to be protected. Considering the material on record I do not find any illegality or irregularity committed by learned Court below in granting interim injunction to the respondents/plaintiffs. The petition is dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 5.3.2009 JUDGE Reema