2. IN THE HIGH COUKT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRrrPETITION (Sl N0..<^ ^ /2011. PETITIONER: / ResBondents .-•^ ^>%>-/ .^^" ^>^y y.^'a^' Chitranjan Singh, son of Jeevrakhan Singh, aged about 50 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Jamnipali, N.T.P.C. Korba, Chhattisgarh. versys 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary Tribal welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhatdsgarh. / 2. Asst.Cominissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Korba, Chhattisgarh. 3. Block Education Officer, Korba, Chhattisgarh. 4. Joint Director, Treasury and Accounts, Korba, Chhattisgarh. WRLT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDJA •vZ^ ;-' HfGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH : BSLASPUj WRIT PETiTiON (S) N0.2235 OF 2Q11 PETiTIONER Chitranjan Sinflh RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & OShers Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of li Single Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri C.J.K. Rao, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur. Depuw Advocate Generai for the State. ORDER S'ORAU (Passed on this 2S ' day or April, 2011) 1. Heard iearned counset for the partles. 2. The petitioner was ininaSfy is.' od. the oet •oost of Assi year 1979. 'eacher on a fixed pav' of completion of the probation peri payscaleRs.169-300. 3. Learned counsel aDoearina for the Detitioner submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether. .the Dstitioner is entitled to reautar oav scaSe w.e.f. the dat® of inioai apDolntment or after compistion of probation period. The issue invoiyed. herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunat, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & others), wherein it was hetd that the simiiariv situated teachers were entitled to regutar pav scale w.e.f. the date of initia! aooointment. The matter was taken up to the Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Ctvil) No. S892/93. The sald petition was dismlssed &y the Supreme Court UDholdlna the decision of the Tribunai to the effect that the Teachers/ Assistant Teachers are entltied to refluiar oav scaie from date of initial appointment. WtiBtei, 5. Learned counsel appearina for the petitioner aiso submits that this Court, while considering fhe same issue in Amar Ssi Ram & off?ers v. State of Chhattisgarh & offiers |W.P. (S) No.4725/2006] by order dated 01.09.2006, aiiowed the Detitioner to make a reoresentation within a oeriod often davs, raising ali theli' Qrievances. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation raisina ail the arisvances in liaht of the aforestated judament and the circular dated 13.01.2009 and in turn, the concerned resoondent is dlrected to decide ths reDresentation. if anv, in accordance with law and the aforestated decisions. on sts own merits. within a oeriod of 8 weeks from the date or recelpt of the representation, subject to verification ofthe facts. 7. !n view of the foreaoina. this oetition is disoosed or. No order asto costs. Satish K. Agi Judge Arun