HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO.28184 OF 2011 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to declare the action of the respondents in trying to make constructions of culvert towards the house of the petitioner situated in plot No.89, Sri Venkateswara House Building Society, Thuglam, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to construct culvert in front of the petitioners house which is situated in plot No.89, Sri Venkateswara House Building Society in Sy.No.102/2D and 103 of Thuglam, Visakhapatnam pending disposal of the present writ petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the 1st respondent. 3. It is stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition that the petitioner purchased an extent of 400 sq. yards plot bearing No.89, situated in Sri Venkateswara House Building Society in Sy.No.102/2D and 103 of Thuglam, Visakhapatnam vide a registered sale deed dated 3.9.1979 from her vendor Appalanaidu and subsequently she constructed R.C.C slabbed house in the said premises and since then she has been in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same. There are two roads existing towards East and Northern side of the property and the 1st respondent constructed drainage lines towards Eastern side of the property and constructed parallel drainages upto the plot No.170 and thereafter a culvert was constructed at the end of plot No.170 and therefore, the drainage was merged to the other end drainage and the same was done by the 1st respondent without following the norms and as a result of which, the sullage water is not flowing freely and it is stagnating and hence, the petitioner has got issued a legal notice on 17.9.2011, to the respondents to take necessary steps for construction of drainage in parallel manner of both sides of the road and stop the illegal proposal of construction of culvert towards her house. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that even though the petitioner has got issued a legal notice dated 17.9.2011 to the respondents to rectify the defect, no action has been taken by them so far and hence he prays to allow the writ petition. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, especially in view of the pendency of the notice dated 17.9.2011 got issued by the petitioner, the 1st respondent is directed to take appropriate decision on the notice dated 17.9.2011 of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and thereafter communicate the same to the petitioner. 6. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU,J. 01.11.2011, Gk. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO.28184 OF 2011 Date:01.11.2011 Gk.