SLE Bk^n ^- <n- C)^ y-^^. IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C c '> ,. „ „ WRIT PETITION ^o. ^^li'9 /2QQ6 PETITIONER '/ .^^^r ^^/y> ^^^ ..-••If'Pi'' ..-•"" ^••"^ .!:>-""- ^:^^ ^-""'' y^' RESPONDENTS Shiv Kumar Lahre, Son of Bhukhau age about 35 years, resiaent of Vfllage - Lalpur, Police Station-Lalpur, T'ahasil- Lorrui, Disfrict-Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUy y ^&^1 ^0' 1. State of Chhattisgarh fhrough Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Social Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The CoUector, BUaspur J "(c.G^r—""' """ 3. The ViUage Panchayat, Lalpur, -TahasU-Lormi, District Bilaspur, through its Sarpanch. ^ 4. Phoolchand, Son of Tirith Ram, age 65 years, resident of Village-Lalpur, Police Station-Lalpur, Tahasil- Lormi, District-Bilaspur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FORJSSUANCE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARY, PROHIBITIQfN, OUO WARRANTO AND ANY OTHER WRIT/ORDER/DIRECTION ON THE SAME NATURE IN THE CIRCUMSTCANCES OF THE CASE. < •0'1'd f' •ssiyed eqpojl^ }ou SAeq 80!]od aL|( }nq 'UORB^ 80i|0d e|L|} eqi '9}seo pe|npeqo3 e Buieq qo'uedj B Ul IOU Sl ^-ON }U9puodss.i 'sjojsjeqi luepuodss.! teiji Moqs qoi^A p3]y uesq SA^I Aq pe}noexo poop 9|es eq} OS|B se jy'ON eteoyiijeo 'etBoyii.iso BUIABSI [ooqos se }UM siji p yoddns u] ''ijouedjBg se psiosj pa|npet)39 e se Jiesiuitj 6uiMoi|s pue SIB^! pejnpsqog B si pe^ ui 'equi ps|npsi|og e ji 'equi ps|npeqog sq} 0} Bui6uo|9q suosje^ ijg qouedjeg ^o }sod 94} yBnoiii ueAe leqi s| ^ pap9|a sem f'o[s| }uspuodssj 'sjojsjsql) ysiy o^ uosjed jaq^o ou 'si ejeq} se pu^ sjsded uojieuiiuou siq p8|y t?'ON tuepuod^s-i (sod sq} joj p|eij suoips|8 sq) u| 'squi p^ jo,} psAjessj useq sey jndfe^ :s6e||!A jo uo o}uejje onbjo {UMB p eouenss! JQJ '^ sfOjtJV -ispun uoiissd )UM 514) psiy SBI| '.ind) :uo!)e}g soi|0d 'jnd|e-| :eBB|i!A y> (U8pisej| S»U9pUOdS8J/S}6}99l|t JO^ |BJ8U9Q S}e30Ap|^ •jsuoiijisd eqi i^i l^Uey^te^ >17+ltj'> piS] h J^tllh ^V»Ujfc.|tb isunoo psujes] pjesq 8Aeq | •UOtpB AUB U9>|B} uj tUiB|dtuoo e speiu JsuoiiBed leg jo isod sq} P]OI| o} uoiiisod •9}seo jLueu}e9 0} sBuojsq ^'ON ?L| jeqie.t siq pue ^••ON }uepuodssj ^puodsej jo uos jo S}SBO Suip.ieBsj ^ons s}ueuinoop uiepso 'uo!}i}©d 9 ®q0} |n.}ss90ons ueeq sei| squi lyiyso psBjoj Suiftiiuqns Aq 'stseo &u si oqw uisjei) (^'ON luspuodssj 9L|( joj pSAjesej si jnd|e-| :8Be||iA I jauoi}!ied eqi p SOUBASUO •pasoddoun '}sod pies sq} .ioj UO!}BUIUJOU ?sod pies 94} uo Bui}S8}uoo joj 'gOOZ Jes^ 941 U! Mouedjeg linpsqos 0} BuiSuoisq suosjsd si|i |jed.ies to }sod eij} )eqi punoj6 eqi |ipu| ^ uosntffsuoo eijuo ^.sz/9Z2 ^e|ig :p!4S!Q 'ILUJO-I :|!sqei 'jndje^ SL|} si oqM 'jsuoffipd 841 •Adoo soueApe uo 'g y (•'°N AtndsQ 'ieMBjBv 'X'N 'W issunoo 'sea usSABJd 'W 9002-8-f i. U^U££S^lfelBiS 'feUiigl^UelbB ^jhyiAi^ue (^i'&bPjlA) tbKh lA^lte lili ./,.......,.......... ttolht<5 ll^hlh r^9^'^'A'CT"~m '^ftlPbJ 'Blfftyi®' h.1-11h.lh- tap 8Z.-3H-IX XI-HC-78 *11M^tl artfTqi '3^ '<iiqin<i, arflti'is, Rt<niyy,< * L^—/t^ < 3TI^?T4aqi ('i^I^^ff) sTi^r^f^iTW cm3tT^Tit)Hi<ti ^ Soma. ^ ^5 ^ 'f) SRTTE5K (rf?(T SH^T 2- Appropriate authority in fr passing any order, the first requ whether respondent No.4 does investigation in the light of the jud Kumari Madhuri Patil and ani Development and others appropriate that in the first in representation/complaint before r^ the notice of respondent No.2. Accordingly, the petitioner complaint before respondent No.2 annexing a copy of this writ petiti respondent No.2 shall get the Committee constituted in pursuan| Kumari Madhuri Patil's case abi thereafter pass appropriate order, No.4 is holding the post of Sarpai justice that the enquiry is conduc' taken in accordance with law withir receipt of the representation/comi; conducted and order should be pa respondent No.4 and the petitioner With the directions aforesaid Consequently, iVI.(W.)P.No.; Parties are entitled for certifii |e matter is respondent No.2. Before frement is to verify and ascertain as to (^ot belong to ST caste, which requires jud^ment of the Apex Court in the matter of t>ther v. Addt. Commissioner, Tribal report^d in AtR 1995 SC 94. Therefore, it is ^tance, the petitioner should make a jspondent No.2 bringing this anomaly to ilTOfe^T WRTf ff fe^t'Tf^RZK ^; srf^Er 3n^?r is atlowed to make a representation/ within a period of-15 days frpm today i]on along with its annexures and in turn, n|iatter enquired from the caste Scrutiny |;e of the judgment of the Apex Court in {>ut the caste of respondent No.4 and in accordance with law. As respondent jich, it is expedient and in the interest df fed expeditiously and appropriate step is a period of three months from the date of (laint. Of course, the enquiry should be ijssed after affording proper opportunity to las well. i the writ petition stands disposed of. p11/2006 also stands disposed of. ^d copy of this order. Sd7 LJ Judge P.T.O.