IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.O.P.C. (T) No. 111 of 2008. Decided on: 1st October, 2010. Naresh Pal Guleria. …Petitioner. -Versus- Shri C. Balakrishan and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Vijay Vir Singh, Advocate vice Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): After going through the contents of the reply, the Court is of the considered opinion that the order dated 13.09.1999, passed in O.A. No. 1361 of 1999, has not been defied. Consequently, the petition is closed. However, in case the petitioner is still aggrieved, he can make a representation to the competent authority for the redressal of his grievance. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge October 01, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.