IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10251 of 2010 1. SUBOL RAI S/O GHINA RAI R/O VILL MARHI (CHOLLAHAR), P.S.AZAMNAGAR, DISTT- KATIHAR – Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COLLECTOR DISTT-KATIHAR 3. THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR (LAND CEILING) DISTT-KATIHAR 4. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND REFORM DISTT-KATIHAR 5. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER BARSOI AT KATIHAR 6. THE CIRCLE OFFICER AZAMNAGAR, DISTT-KATIHAR 7. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR AZAMNAGAR, DISTT-KATIHAR 8. THE CIRCLE AMIN AZAMNAGAR, DISTT-KATIHAR – Respondents. ----------- 2 9.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner claims that he was settled .14 acres of land vide Basgit Case No. 33/1970-71 out of total area of .86 acres in the year 1990. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that the Amin has given a wrong report on measurement of the land in question. The stand of the petitioner is that he should not be disturbed from possession of .14 acres of land of Mauza Marhi, Thana No. 529, Khata No. 43, Khesra No. 318. The petitioner would be at liberty to move the appropriate authority against the report of the Amin. If the appropriate authority on re- measurement finds that in fact the land in question is not available on the said plot and the land is smaller than the area for which Basgit Parcha was granted, appropriate steps should be taken by the authority by correction of the Parcha issued to the petitioner. The matter may be disposed of if the petitioner takes steps to file an application within a period of six months from the filing of the said application / representation. This writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)