WP 6465/11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6465/2011 Deepali Sureshi Ahire V/s The State & others. _______________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | Shri A.G. Talhar, Advocate for petitioner. Shri V.D. Rakh, AGP for respondent nos.1 & 4. Shri P.P. More, Advocate for respondent no.2. Shri A.B. Girase, Advocate for respondent no.3. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. Date: 15.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has approached this Court praying for direction to respondent nos. 3 & 4 to declare the result of the petitioner of First Year Engineering Computer Science course. The petitioner had earlier approached this Court by filing Writ Petition No.6808/2010. This Court vide order dated 26.4.2011 directed the respondent no.2 – committee to decide the tribal claim of the WP 6465/11 2 petitioner within eight weeks from the date of passing the order by the Court. The respondent – University was also directed to declare the result of the petitioner of First Year Engineering (Computer course) examination, which was held in November / December, 2010. It appears that the respondent no.2 – committee has not decided the claim of the petitioner. During the intervening period, the petitioner has appeared for First Year in April, 2011, however, the said result is not yet declared. As such the petitioner has approached this Court. The petitioner cannot be faulted with on account of delay on the part of the respondent no.2 in not deciding the claim of the petitioner. We, therefore, allow the petition in the following terms. The respondent nos.3 & 4 shall continue to declare the result of the petitioner and permit the petitioner to prosecute further WP 6465/11 3 studies till the decision of the respondent no. 2 – committee on the claim of the petitioner. In the event, the decision of the respondent no.2 – committee is adverse to the interest of the petitioner, the same shall not be given effect to for a further period of four weeks from the date of communication of the decision to the petitioner. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. No order as to costs. (M.T. Joshi, J.) (B.R. Gavai, J.) Dt/- 15.09.2011 ndk/c1591117