IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No : 21364 of 2002 Between: M/s.Kapila Polymers Rep. by its Proprietor, K.Rambabu, S/o.K.Ramaiah, R/o.Plot No.105, Amarjothi Colony, New Bowenapally, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 M/s.Vasavi Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd., Rep. by its Branch Manager, Malakept Branch, Sri Krupa Agricultural Market, Malakpet, Hyderabad. 2 The Dy.Registrar of Co-Operative Societies Officer Special Duty. The Vasavi Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd., Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue pass an order or a direction are writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent Bank to adopt the guidelines of Reserve Bank of India which directs the Banks to adopt one time settlement of waiving the total interest from the date of non-performance of the Petitioner Company on the non-performing account and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.Y.VISWESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 21364 of 2002 O R D E R: Since the learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Y.Visweswara Rao, died, in compliance with the order of this Court dated 18-02-2008, administrative notice was sent to the petitioner. As per the office note, the said notice was returned un-served with the postal endorsement “no such addressee”. The registry also states that no other learned counsel has filed vakalath on behalf of the petitioner so far. When the matter is called today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 28-11-2008 KLP