‘d'iiz‘ou V ‘ K ' ‘ ' PETITIONER Amaranth Vaghakar S/o V ‘ L Shri Inlfda’l‘ Vaghakar about ‘WR'IT PETITrdN ‘(si 'N‘o’; '3‘} ‘50 Yeafrsr occupation Head 1 w gMaster: Middle School 5i \Sighali, Block Katghora I ‘ L ‘ ‘ istt;1j<orb‘a(C.G;) VERSUS / : ' 1. State of Chhattisgarh _ c y a Through ' Secretary; r Tribal ‘Welfaré r V DepOrtment, D'.K.S.“ Bhawan,' Raipur, (C.G.) ' a 2. Commissionerx Tribal L Welfare Department, I Raipur Disrict * (C.G.) / . . 3. Ass1stant Comm1ss1or1er,‘ Tribal Welfare Department, Korba ‘ {District Korba . 4. Joint Director, Treasury,acc01,1nts, pension, _ Bilasu istri-ilas (C .G .) Rfoiw'DETs p EsrN: Raipur V wR§IT tINDER'ARjiIcLE 226:0F‘THE ‘CONSTITUTION OF ‘ I ’ 'A ‘ D i 1" / t . (CG.) pr DctBpur WWWW mmw?@M3Q@ 200 mam (Wu) Mmi‘awia; 3911mm mmm WWW13WW SB Hon ble Shn Mamndra Mohar Shrlvastavaa’lPTm “a“ 24=96-?91" Shn Amit Sharma} counsei for ihe petmqners. _ , ShriAyShridhar, Panei Lamar forthe State. Heard on admission. Learned c6unsel appearing for the petitioner submits thai the petitioner is entitied to‘gria'ntbf regular pay scale irom the initial date of appointment in View of circular dated 5i01'i2d11(Annexure Pf2), Issued by the State Government and In View of order passed by the iVIad a Pradesn State Administrative inbunal Jabalpur in 0 A No 2745189 (Madhu nt Yadu and 56 others v State of M P & others) which tater on attained matity as S L P against the same was dismissed oy the’bupreme Court Learned counsel for the petitioner Submits that the respondents may e directed to consider the case of the petitioner. On the other hand, iearned co nsei for the respondents submits that if the petitioner claims beneft of Circular d ted 5/1/2011‘ the petitioner ought to have frst approached the respondents clai mg such beneft Taking into consideration the ubmissions made by the parties and also taking into consideration that orders have been passed in numoer of cases petitioner is granted iiberty to approa h respondent authorities claiming beneft based on circular dated o/1i2u11 lf the petitioner stands on the ame footings as per order passed by the SAT in iifiadhukant Yaciu (Supra) an subsequently confimied by the Supreme Court in Spemal Leave Petition (CiVil) No 0834/93 the petitioner may be entitled to same relief With the aforesaid observation ,the petition stands finally disposed off. Sd/— mndra Mohan Shrlvas Judge 7 a ta