IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31318 of 2009 MUNNA CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 07. 11. 2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Allegation in the F.I.R. is that the petitioner along with others allegedly come to informant’s house to negotiate for compromise in a case filed by the son of the deceased which was refused. Thereafter, it is said that the petitioner and others took the deceased near a temple in side of a pond and provided him wine with poison resulting into his death, thereafter, his dead body was allegedly disposed by the petitioner and others. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner allegation of forcing the compromise and at the same time taking the deceased to take wine can not be believable for petitioner’s arrest at the moment. I also agree with this submission. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner , namely, Munna Chaudhary shall be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of communication of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Motihari, East Champaran, in connection 2 with Sangrampur Police Station Case No. 78 of 2007, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. m.p. (Mandhata Singh,J)