IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15993 of 2010 Bhim Singh & others Vs. State of Haryana & another Present: Mr.Neeraj Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioners are seeking appointment in terms of the directions issued by this court vide Annexure P-7. This court, while deciding the writ petition, had issued the following directions:- “These petitions are, accordingly, disposed of with a direction to the respondents to appoint the petitioners against 12 E.S.M. Category vacancies on the basis of their inter se merit from the merit list dated 15.10.1989. The first 12 meritorious petitioners would be appointed against these vacancies irrespective of the category within a period of two months.” There is, thus, a direction to offer appointment to the persons in merit irrespective of the category to which they belong. No material is placed on record of this case to show that there are some vacancies available against which any other person can be so appointed. The petitioners, if had any grouse, were required to seek relief in the said writ petition either by becoming a party or otherwise. In case the petitioners are interested in pursuing any remedy apart from those 12 vacancies, they are required to show that there would still be vacancies available against which they can be appointed as per their merits, which information is not forthcoming. Counsel seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition to move an appropriate application in CWP No.3429 of 2009, which has been disposed of on 3.8.2010. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. September 08, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE