In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … COCP No. 1596 of 2009(O&M) Date of decision: November 4, 2009 M/s Shiva Construction and another .. Petitioner Versus Dr. Raghvender Tanwar ..Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr. Rajesh Arora, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.C.Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. V.S.Rana, Advocate for the respondent .. Rakesh Kumar Garg,J(Oral) Reply filed on behalf of the respondent in court is taken on the record. In view of the reply filed, learned counsel for the petitioners does not wish to press this petition. In the aforesaid reply, it has been specifically stated that the judgment passed by this court has been complied with by appointing a new Arbitrator. In view of the aforesaid fact, I am not inclined to proceed further in this petition. Rule discharged. November 4, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE