IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19612 of 2010 PUROSHOTTAM PRASAD . Versus BRAHMDEO PRASAD . ----------- 2/ 10/01/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 21.8.2010 passed by the Execution Munsif, Gaya in Execution Case No.15/07 rejecting the application dated 27.7.2010 filed under Section-151 Cr.P.C. for a direction to the decree holder to hand over the articles mentioned in Schedule-A of the petition. The petitioner is stated to have been a tenant who had also installed certain machineries in the premises. An eviction suit was filed and he was forcefully dispossessed. The possession was restored by compromise during the pendency of the proceedings wherein eviction has finally been ordered. An objection has been taken in the execution case that at the initial time when he was forcefully dispossessed and his machineries removed, have not been returned. It is fairly acknowledged that the petitioner had filed a similar application earlier on 14.7.2009 which was replied to the decree holder on 10.8.2009. It was rejected by the Execution Munsif, Gaya on 12.11.2009. That order has - 2 - not been questioned and has attained finality. If that order has attained finality, the petitioner cannot be permitted to reopen that issue again by merely filing a repeat application for restoration of machinaries. The writ application is dismissed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)