1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.284 of 1999 (Dhanaji Vs. Vishnu) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:25/8/2009 ... P.C.: 1. The order of acquittal recorded on April 26th, 1999, by the learned Sessions Judge ( as then he was) is subject of challenge by the complainant. 2. The factual details indicate that there was controversy between the Advocate/applicant herein and his Clerk, which gave rise to proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and in the news item there was no reference to the caste of the present petitioner/original complainant. The learned Judge, considering the evidence found that no case for infraction of Section 3(1)(x) of Scheduled Castes and 2 Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, was made out against the accused. I do not see any infirmity in the order under challenge. No merit. Hence, Criminal Revision Application dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/284-99crra ...