IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.30635 OF 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 12, 2011 Ruman Devi & another ...Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr.S.P.Tyagi, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The counsel has placed before the Court original of Annexure P-3 for perusal. The same is returned to the counsel after perusal. The petitioners are seeking protection for their life and liberty as they have married against the wishes of their parents. The couple is present in the court. The petition is disposed of with a direction to the Superintendent of Police, Sonepat to look into the complaint of the petitioners and in case he finds that there is any threat to their life and liberty, he will take appropriate action on the said complaint. Superintendent of Police, Sonepat would be at liberty to ask the petitioners to reimburse the cost of protection in case it is required to be provided to the petitioners. The present order, however, shall not be deemed to be proof qua the factum/validity of their matrimonial alliance. October 12, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE