:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.42 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.42 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.42 OF 2008 Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant. v. Harish Mewada & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.Vijay Thorat with Mr.A.Rao , advs. for the Appellant. Mr.P.Samlani with Mr.H.Kode , advs. for the Respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 30th January, 2008. DATE: 30th January, 2008. DATE: 30th January, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Parties. 2. In the notice of motion filed by the plaintiff/appellant, ad-interim relief was refused by the trial Court observing that the plaintiff could seek desired reliefs in the suit pending before the High Court in respect of suit property between the said parties. It appears that in the suit before the High Court the present plaintiff/appellant is defendant and possibly he can not get the reliefs, which he sought in the notice of motion filed before the City Civil Court. After some discussion at bar, I find that the appeal may be disposed off with the following directions: i. Respondents shall file their detailed reply to :2: the notice of motion within one week from this day and the trial Court shall hear the parties on notice of motion on its own merits and decide the same as far as possible within two weeks thereafter. The trial Court shall not be influenced by any observations made in the order dated 11-12-2007. This Court has not expressed any view on the merits of the case. 3. Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)