THE HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.15081 OF 1999 Dt.02.06.2010 Between: Manne Butchamma ……………Petitioner Vs. The Superintending Engineer, A.P.State Electricity Board, Operational Circle, Medak District and two others. ………………Respondents. O R D E R: This writ petition is filed seeking writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the quashing the of the order of the third respondent dated 30.04.1998 in I.D.No.100 of 1994 on the file of the Labour Court II, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and to quash the same being arbitrary and illegal. The writ petitioner filed I.D.No.100 of 1994 under Section 2-A (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act claiming that she was working as part time contingent staff in the Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board and was working in the Operation Circle at Siddipet on a consolidated pay. It is alleged that the second respondent by an order dated 07.06.1994 instructed the Assistant Engineers not to engage any part time contingent employees and to dispense with their service. Accordingly the petitioner was orally instructed not to attend the duty on 01.06.1994. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed I.D.No.100 of 1994 seeking a direction for reinstatement with continuity of service. Counter was filed on behalf of the respondents denying the allegations made by the petitioner and stating that there was no work to be attended to by the petitioner or anybody, because the departmental employees were posted to attend such work in different divisions. The petitioner got herself examined as W.W.1, however, no documents were marked on her behalf. On the basis of the pleadings, the following points were formulated by the Labour Court: 1) Whether any part time contingent employee posts were existing in the A.P.S.E.B. at any time? 2) Whether the petitioner worked as a contingent employee of the respondent at any time? 3) Whether the petitioner was illegally removed from service by the respondents? 4) To what relief? On appreciation of the material available on record, the Labour Court holding that the petitioner failed to prove that she worked under the respondents at any point of time and held against the petitioner and accordingly dismissed I.D.No.100 of 1994 by award dated 30.04.1998. I have carefully considered the material available on record and I do not find any reason to interfere with the findings of fact recorded by the Labour Court consequently the impugned order, in exercise of the powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ___________ G.ROHINI J., Dt.02.06.2010 tjs