- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.6455 OF 2002 Mr.N.R. Bubna for the Petitioner. Ms.Pragna Gala for Respondent No.1. ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ ¦ ¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. ¦ DATED: 13TH APRIL,2005 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. He submits that some of the grounds which were raised by him in the memo of revision were not considered by the Revisional Authority while passing impugned order. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is not able to point out to me from the memo of revision as to which ground raised by him in the memo of revision has not been considered by the Revisional Authority while passing - 2 - the impugned order. 2. I find from the petition that the grievance of the Petitioner was that some amounts were payable by the society to the Petitioner and therefore while working out the amounts that are payable by the Petitioner to the society, the amounts payable by the society to the Petitioner have not been taken into consideration. In my opinion, in such situation if the society is not giving credit to the Petitioner, the remedy of the Petitioner is to institute proceedings against the society for recovery of those amounts and not to claim credit in the revisional proceedings. Petition disposed of. Any ad-interim order that may be operating is vacated. ...