IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2010 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 11214 of 2010(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- SANDHYA VIJAYAN, AATHIRA, T.C.6/2213, EDAVILAKAM LANE, ASOKA GARDENS, VALIYAVILA, VATTIYOORKAVU. BY ADV. SRI.A.ABDUL KHARIM SRI.LIJU.V.STEPHEN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 3. CHIEF TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF TOWN PLANNING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION. 4. CONCURRENCE COMMITTEE, TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA SRI.P.K.MANOJ KUMAR, SC FOR CORPN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 11214 OF 2010 (B) ===================== Dated this the 31st day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T Delay in considering Ext.P2 application made by the petitioner for a building permit is what is complained of. 2. From the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner and the learned senior counsel appearing for the Corporation, it is evident that Ext.P2 has been forwarded and is pending before the 4th respondent for their concurrence. It is also pointed out that only after concurrence of the 4th respondent is conveyed to the 2nd respondent, can the 2nd respondent pass final orders in the matter. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 4th respondent to consider Ext.P2 and pass orders thereon. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. If the 4th respondent concurs with the proposal, the 2nd respondent shall pass final orders in the matter within 3 weeks thereafter. WPC No. 11214/10 :2 : Petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before respondents 2 and 4 for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp