HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR FB-stAttBeal(Misc.)No.l7ofa009 APPELLANT: (Or^mal Respondea^ Siirblut Dileep Barla Versus 'ga RESPONDBNT: (Original Peti.tk>neij Smt. Dhara SurbUt Barla JUDQMBNT FOR CONSIDBRATION (~i Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge HON*BU»NR.JUSTICa; RJI. CTBANTOAKAR ^f. ^^y^- R.N. Chandrakar Judge -^ POST POR JUDOMENT CiNAg APRIL. 2009 Sd/- Dhu-endra Mishra Judge fr' '^•: \- 9iSSSSS9SSiSiaSCS:y yS!^iyV^^ © •<"> r" mGH COURT <W CHHATTBBGARH AT BILABPim Fu-stAoBeaKMisc.) No.l7of2009 APPBbLANT: (Origin^Respoiidea^ Surbhit DIteep Barla, Soa ofDileep Siagh Barla, Age(?? 33 years, Presentty residn^; at 15, MiAti 9, Samart Nagar, Naahik (Maharashte^ - 422005 Versus RESPONDENT: (Origiaal Petitioiiet) Smt Dhara Surbbit Barte, Age29 ycars, Residing at 29, Nayjeevan Society, Near Pachpedi Naka, Raipur (Chfaattisgarh) 492001 (Appeal under Section 19 ofthe Faauty Courts Act, 1984) Present; Shri Vibhor Dilecp Barla, coiinscl for the appelteuit. Dlvtetea Ben«dt:Hoa'bto Ettri DMiendra Mtetea •sHfta'tete 8IutR.Il. ca»aadndtaur.JJ. JUDGMBItT (Dclivered on5^'l'Apnl. 2009) ~ The foUowiag judgment of fhe Court was deHvcred by DIitrendra Midua, J. 1. This First Appcal (MiSccUaBeous) w duwrted ^ainst the oa?der dated 27-11-2008 passed in CivU Sult No.85-A/2007 wBcBeby teamcd 1" Additiotial Principal Judge, Fanaily Coiirt, Raipur has wjccted the ^ application ofl^he eqppeUsatt uader Section 24 read wifh Oader 7 Rute 11 (d), Sections 25 and 151 offhc C.P.C.. 2. Briefly stated facts of thc case are tteat fhe appcllant had flled aa applteation uader Scction 13 (l)(ia) of the Hiadu Mmriagp Act, 1955 (for short 'the Acf) m the Court of CvritJudge, Setuor Diviaion, N^drik, State of Mahaaashtoca on 13th Juty 2007 whereas, the respondent wtfe filed a civfl suit N0.85-A/2007 on 10A May 2007 beforc the Famity Cotirt Rayur. The Hon'blc Supreme Court allowing fhe appMeation of fhe respondeat under x \. ^. <---v ^< <.:, Section 25 of the C.P.C> tratisfeiTed the divorce caae pending at Nasik, ' State of Maharashtra to the Famity Coiut, Raipur, wtthin the State of Chhatdsgarh. The appcBant applied for dMmissal af Civfl Sult No.SS- •A/2007 vide his application ofAanexure-A/2 on the grouml that a vfeiy of the onlcr offhe Supreiac Court, fhe earlicrsuifrinstltuted by fhe appeMant stands teausferred to the Fainily Court, Raipur and, tfaeiribBe, siitoseqncat suit canaot continue simulteaeousty wifh fhe afbresaid teansfea"red stiit oa the same grouad ofcruelty under Section 13 offheAct. Learaed Fana^- Court rejccted fhe above appUcatlon with aa obser»ationthat bofh. fhe suits have been fited under Section 13 ofthe Act Sincc thc sultofwife was filed earMer as per the provteions of Scctkin 21 (2)(b) ofllte Act, fheie &s no legal impediment ia procceding wlfh fhc suit, as Scction 21 (2)(b) clcarty • eavisages fhatifthe petitfons arc presentedia two dlfitorerrt Distrk-t Courts, fhe petitfon presented later shaU be transfctred to the Distrtct Court in which earHer petition -was presented and bofh the petitioas shafl bc heatd and disposed of together by fbe district court in which earlier petitioa was prescnted. 3. After heariag lcamed counsel fi»rthe appeBaat aad after goii^ ttuough fhe anpugaed order passed by the teamed Famity Coiut, we are of fhe opinion that tearaed Pamity Court has righffy rqected tfae apiriicatk>n of the appellaat for disinissal offhesuit aad fhere is ao iUegaUty jn 'Sw ordcr. 4. The appeal beit^; devoid of sitbstaacc desetves to be dismissed and is accordit^fy dismisscd. N0 orders as to costs. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge R.N. Chandrakar Judge Barve