1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1367 & 1368 BOTH OF 2010 (Suresh Bhaurao Bharne and Munnalal Madavi and another vs. . State of Maharashtra) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. S.U.Bhuyar, Advocate for applicants Mr. J B Jaiswal, APP for Respondent CORAM : A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATED : 17 th September, 2010. Heard. 2. Learned Advocate for the applicants prayed for grant of bail in respect of Crime No. 73/2009 on the ground that charge-sheet is already filed and one of the co-accused by name Brijlal Patle has been released on bail in respect of the alleged murder case. 3. Learned APP strongly objected grant of bail on the ground that the learned Addl. Sessions Judge after considering the material collected during the investigation in the form of three eye witnesses, has already rejected plea for bail and there is no change in the circumstances. It appears that wife of the deceased is one of the main eye witness who had seen the incident and her statement was recorded on 16.10.2009 regarding the incident. The applicants have been specifically named with active role attributed to them in the murderous assault, by which the 2 deceased had suffered fracture of his skull and was murdered. It is also contended that it was a murder by unlawful assembly and specific role has been attributed to the assailants who are named by eye witness and, If released on bail, the applicants are likely to tamper with the prosecution evidence and considering the prima facie involvement if convicted, the offence may attract imprisonment for life or substantive sentence of imprisonment. Under these circumstances, the plea for bail has to be rejected and the same is rejected. The trial Court shall endeavour to dispose of the Sessions case No. 7/2010 as early as possible. Both applications stands rejected. JUDGE Sahare