IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 9433 of 2008. Decided on 9th December, 2010. _____________________________________________________ B.R. Khoshiya. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : None. For the respondents. : Mr. R.P. Singh & Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate Generals. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner was appointed only for a period of six months as per Annexure A-1, dated 23rd November, 1998. However, his services were terminated vide Annexure A-6, dated 9th May, 2003. It has come in the reply that initially the post against which the petitioner was appointed, was funded by the State Government and subsequently, there was no financial provision for this post. Since the petitioner has been appointed only for a period of six months and the funds were not available with the respondent, there is no illegality in the action of the respondents in terminating the services of the petitioner. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 09, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - - 3 - `