^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.} Writ Petition No. 1352/2004 PETITIONER Baliram Sahu, S/o Late Shri NUtram Sahu, aged about 63 years, R/0 Village : Dindouri, Gram Panchayat: Surajpura, Tahsil: Lormi, Distt. : Bilaspur. Versus RESPONDENTS ^^•f //^ /^ ^'.^N^" <tf}"" 7 ,^'^/ ^•^.?' sn /' .'S' .• w< / . y h.' 1. State ofChhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Home, DKS Bhawan, Govt.of C.G., Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 2. The Superintendent of Police, Bilaspur, Distt: Bilaspur(C.G.) ^ 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer (Police), Mungeli, Tahsil:IVIungeli, Distt.: Bilaspur(C.G.). 4. The Station House Officer, Police Station : Lalpur, Tahsil: Lormi, Distt.: Bilaspur(C.G.). 5. Shri Brij Bihari Sahu, Steno % the Suptd.of Police, Distt.: Bilaspur(C.G.). 6. Shri Shiv Kumar Sahu, S/0 Shri Santram Sahu, aged about 45 years, Assistant Jailer, Central Jail, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/ CEWIORARI ETC.ORDIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. ...,•.•;"? ^ HIGH COURT OS CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmQN N0.13S2 OF 2004 Petitioner BaliramSahu Versus Resoondents - SlateofChhattisgarh&Ottiere WR(T RETITION UNDERARTICLE 226Q77 OF THE CONSTn-UTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihofri, J.) Present:- Shri Rakesh Pandey, Advocate fer the petitloner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDERtORAI.l passed on ltfh day <rf ^igust, 2010) 1. The petitioner, by this petition, seeks a dlreGtion to close the history sheet and Surveillance Register maintained by the police against the petttioner and further to consicter the removal of his rame froni the Gunda (Habitual Offenders) List, published on 24/8/1996. 2. Shrt Thakur, teamed counsel a^aearing for fhe Sate resporKlents submits that the name of petitioner has never figured In the list of habituat offenders (Gunda) and so far as several cases reglstered under the provisions of Sections 107 and 116 of the Cr.P.C. under different crime numbers. Crime No.5/90 under Sectlon 110 of Cr.P.C. and offence under Section 324/294, 506-B and 336/34 of I.P.C. as welt as crime No. 50/^ under Section 107 & 116 of Cr.P.C. were closed. Thys, at thls ste®e,the petittpn has tocome infructuous and nothing survives for adjudication. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petifioner concure witti the submisston made by the State counsd. AccorcUngty; the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 4. No order asto costs. Sd/- satteh K. Agnlhotri Judge ashok