IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3475 of 2006 (O&M) Date of decision: January 15, 2009 Ramesh Bajaj .. Petitioner v. Paramjeet and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Kumar Jain, Advocate for respondent No.1. .. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 17.4.2006, passed by the learned court below, whereby the evidence of the petitioner- defendant has been closed by order of the court. The suit is pending since the year 1997, where the prayer is for injunction. As is noticed by the learned court below, vide order dated 3.4.2006, passed in the presence of counsel for the parties, one final opportunity was granted to the petitioner-defendant for completion of entire evidence at his own responsibility and it was made clear therein that failing which the evidence shall be closed by order of the court with no further opportunity. On failure of the petitioner to conclude the evidence on the date fixed, the learned court below closed the same. Keeping in view the fact that a simplicitor suit for injunction filed by tenant against the landlord is pending since 1997, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of any further opportunity for leading the evidence. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 15.1.2009 mk