[1] CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION 68/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 68/2009 IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3945/2007 ARYA SAMAJ PAHADI ZILA BHARATPUR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. Date: 27.03.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE Mr. Satish Khandelwal, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner. **** Heard on the application moved on behalf of the petitioner. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that while dismissing the writ petition vide order dated 10.08.2007, this Court has observed that it is for the respondents to consider the representation and the same has not been considered, therefore, this application has been filed for seeking direction to consider the same. In the order dated 10.08.2007 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3945/2007, it was made clear that the writ petition is premature but the respondents are at liberty to consider the representation and if the same has not been considered, then in such eventuality, the petitioner has remedy to redress his grievance before appropriate forum, but at this stage, no direction [2] CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION 68/2009 for consideration of the representation can be passed on this application. Consequently, the application fails being devoid of merit and the same is hereby rejected. (K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/