'?Y.. ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.^efNo. ' 3 73^<%:'\\ PEtLTIQNER y Yamini Vaidya, D/o Yashwant Khaparde aged about 25 years, R/o Near Old Power House Gate, CSEB Colony, Antagarh, Kanker (C.G). VE^RSUS RESmNDENTS g1 '^yyy ^j- w^ll":.^°'>^ ^c^'y'' AD /;' //' ::^ ii -3 1€?^ ' S ii3> /^%'"j/ ^/ ^'/*^ •^ 1. Caste Certificate High Level Scrutiny Comiiuttee, Scheduled Caste and Trainmg Institute, Pfc Ravishankar Shukla University Canapus, Raipur :(c.q;,. "•,;..' ;::'.' f^ 2. State pf Chhatdsgarh, thrbugh its Secretary, Department ofHome Afiairs, Mantralay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur •(c.e.): v.: •\ • : : . ^ 3. DireGtor (ReseaTch), Caste Certifieate High Leyel Scrutiny Committee, Scheduled Caste and Trainuig Institute, Pf. Ravishankar Shukla University Campus, Raipur (C.G) IH WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTIC3-E 226 OF THE CONSTTTUnOliTOF INDIA , : , : 1- : : :-.- . : : /.: The Petitioner named above most respectfully submits asunder; - 1. PARTICULAR OFTHE PETmONER: As shown in the cause title. ^j ^ v^ E sg H1GH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH OT BILASPUR WRITPETITIONfSt N0.3 OF 2011 Pet'rtioner Versus Respondents Yamini Vaidya Caste Certificate High Level Scrutiny Committee & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THECONSTITUTION OFINDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K.Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Vaibhav Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Dy. Advocate Qeneral & Shri Sushil Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on 05th day of January, 201 1) 1. Learned counsel appeanng for the petitioner submits that the respondent committee is not providing an application form for verification of the caste certificate issued in hls favour by the competent authority. Thus, this petition. 2. Shri Thakur, learned Dy. Advocate General appearing for the respondents submits that after the decision of this Court in Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria v. State of Chhattisgarh and others and other connected matters, there is no question of refusing to supplyan application form on demand. Accordingly, if the petitioner approaches the authorities for application form or makes an application for verificatipn of the caste certificate, the same shall be considered and decidedwithin a period of 8 weeks, inaccordance with law, as laid down by the Supreme Court and this Court in various decisions. 3. In view of foregoing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for adjudication in this matter. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. ;— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok 'WP (S) No.3338.af 2007 (decidedon 19-8-20103 ^t, ww^x f-'-^^^-x"??^-^-