IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36795 of 2007 ENAMUL HAQUE @ MD.ENAMUL HAQUE Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 7 09.12.2009. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The instant application is directed against order taking cognizance dated 19.8.2006, passed by Judicial Magistrate, Ara in Complaint case no. 910C of 2006/Tr No. 2428 of 2006, under sections 387,506 and 509 of the I.P.C. on the allegation that petitioner used to talk with complainant’s wife on telephone against his/her wishes. Furthermore, the petitioner who is Sergeant in the Indian Air force threatened complainant’s wife that if she did not come to meet him, he will defame her in presence of his family as she had relationship with him before marriage. The petitioner submits that there is a chance of compromise between the parties. From perusal of records, it appears that complainant examined five witnesses in support of his allegation against petitioner. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara after examining the complainant on solemn affirmation took cognizance of the offence under the aforesaid sections of the Penal Code. The cr. misc. case is disposed of with observation that in case any compromise petition is filed by the parties in the court below, the learned trial court in seisin of the case will dispose of the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the same in terms of compromise petition. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)