5F= PageNo. (<y) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR §^9Bench- C. R. N0. 77^-72006 PETITIONER Claimant Prahlad Sharma S/o Rajaram Sharma, aged about 38 year, Occupation - Buseness R/o Takiya Road, Ambikapur, District - Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS RESPQjmENT Isfon- Applicants 1. Chhabada Bus Service, Through:- Proprietor Sardar Mahendra Singh Chhabada S/o Agyat (unknown), R/o Ring Road Namanakala, Nagar, P.8. & Tahsil Ambikapur, District - Surguja (C.G.) 2. The Oriental Insurance Company, ^ Shakha- Ambikapur near of State Bank, Sadar Road, Ambikapur, Nagar, P.S. 85 Tahsil- Amikapur, District - Surguja (C.G.) 3., Mohammad Shafif @ Anul Hasan S/o Manjoor Khan, aged 38 years Occupation- Driver, R/o Mominpura, Nagar P.S. & Tahsil Ambikapur, District - Surguja (C.G.) CIVIL REVLSIONUNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CODE OF PRQCEDURE XI-HC-78 3TTS/T^TfN^ cWJTT^?T$h^ich +ll*lCTt<Sh*l|ch 3^T rqi^ld^, ^Tn^^Ko, f^dl^y ri^.d.-.^^J;/^^/. ^[200 ^ 3T1^?T^ra? (yt^q^) ?^TTW^1N^ST 08.11.2006 PetJtioner-Prohlad Sharmo|by Shri Subhash Yadav, Advocate. ofjan order dated 07.09.2006 passed This revision arjses out by the 3rd Addittonat Motor Acc|< Oist. Surgqja in M.J.C.No.20 of 2p06. The petittoner herein ha^ respondents herein before th® aw<»-dfor Rs.8,01,380/- wos pas^ed ' petitroner. In compliance of tfi|e have dready deposited the amo^nt Tribunal. The petitioner had fi te|i Rs.4,50j000/~ from the amount fittiry of Endolite below knee an<( the leamed Claims Tribund. passing the impugned order disbursement of onty Rs,20j000/-| Shri Subhash Yadav, contends -ttiat he presses the Civ| disbursement of Rs.65,350/- whj Endolite below the knee prosthe^is, Prosthetfc & Orthotic Centre, fil^d not on the ground of requirement cbl^td41-l ^ll^dT ^ te^t <^l^l< ^3Tf^T3TT^T lents Claims Tribunal, Ambikapur1, filed a cldm case <g<iinst the learrwid CtaintS TribunaJ in which on 18.03.2004 in favour of the award, the respondents herem awarded in the teamed Ctalms an appljcation for withdrcwd of |eposjted by the respondents foi* olso for business pur(x>se before leamed Claims Tribund while 07.09.2006 permitted the Ifor treatment. counsel for the petitioner Revteion only on the question of |ch te required for fittiry of an ^is, as per quotation of Endotite before the Claims Tribunal and for business purposes. Tfie d<kted learined XI-HC-78 ^n^T^rf^TT^ ^^TI^T5h^|cb 3^r '*ii^i<n^, ^ftwra:, f^rray *11*<^l S»»*TT^» ^200 (?T ^^T (lic'Ucl<^) ?^TTW ^rfgcf 3TI^T ^ z. In Ihis view of the mfltte|r, dispos®of the Cwil Revision with^ut to order that the leamed Claims| of Rs.65,350/- djrectly to the| Centre by a Oemand Oraft on| Claimant/PetJtioner herein. With the above observatfon, passed by the tearned Claims Tri|?unal Revision is disposed of. Certified copy os per rute4 ^raf^frr w^ff^'te^^£K ^3:rf^T3TT^T ^, it appears just and proper to notice to the respondents and Tribunal shall dfeburse an amount Endotite Prosthetic A Orthotic fumishing requisite bitl by the on, the order dated 07.09.2006 stands modified and 1+ie Civil Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge