IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22570 of 2010 BANDELAL MEHTA, SON OF LATE LAL BAHADUR MEHTA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution case is that when the Informant learnt about the murder of his son, he went there and found him dead on account of Fire Arms injuries. He suspected the petitioner and his family of having committed this occurrence on account of land dispute. However, there appears to be no eye witness to the occurrence and the entire case is based only on suspicion. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 6.5.2010 and has no criminal antecedents, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in Sour Bazar P.S. Case No. 17 of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the 2 petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)