iN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATISGARH AT BILASUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 42—35 OF 2004. PETITTIONER. HEALTH EMPLOYEES UNION I I WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITIS) I ORDERISI I DIRECTI0N(§), ETC. . -,....... \Aq O.’ g {II a ALII / HROUGH 0P. SHARMA, PRESIDENT, 136, SUNDER NAGAR, RAIPUR w\.(M 0G. STATE. w _ “\ n II VERSUS T $owa€3 W RESPONDENTS. $9} Q Ta) Q‘gReaAxS 1) STATE OF CHHATISGARH THROUGH PRINCIPALSECRETARY, CQSSQKRS ‘ HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE DEPTT. S“ GOVT. OF CHHATTSGARH, ' DKS BHAWAN, K an a RAIPUR. “ . CG STATE 2) SECRETARY, GAD. ( GOVT. OF CHHATISGARH, OKs BHAWAN, RATPUR. (CG) S) UNDER SECRETARY, HEALTH & FAMTLY WELFARE DEPTT, GOVT. OF CHHATISGARH, DKS BHAWAN, RAIPUR. (CG) mam WWW pdhw’* 10-1—2005 Smt. Mala Dubsy, Counsel for the petitionc‘r. Shri Sandaap Dubey, Pan€1 Lawyer for thc Stata. CounSEl for the petitioner wants to withdraw the petition ancl submits that liberty may be given to the members of the petitioner-union to file individua] petitionS. The prayer is not opposed by the State counsel. In fact the State counsel contended that grievance being individual, individual persons should me separate petitions. In that View of the matter, the peu'tion is disposed of with liberty to the members of the petitioner-union that they may avail remedy available under law including tiling of individual petitions, if so desire. Consequently, M.W.P. No. 4602/2004 and LA. No. 5t fll r H m~~' Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge 8577] 2004 also stand disposed of. GRPRJ FS/350 12/2000~50,000,