IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19244 of 2010 RAJDEO SINGH @ RAJDEO RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 27.05.2010 Let the petitioner make correction in the prayer portion of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail since 30.01.2010 in a case registered under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that the informant was informed by Shri Bhagwan Mahto about murder of Yogendra Mahto. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that Shri Bhagwan Mahto informed the informant that in his presence the victim was killed, but the said informer did not name the petitioner and petitioner’s name subsequently came during the investigation. Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner’s name appeared subsequently during the investigation but it appears that the impugned order does not reflect the actual material in those paragraphs of the case diary. Considering the aforesaid submissions that the petitioner was not initially named and subsequently only - 2 - suspicion has been raised against him, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court no.3, Chapra in connection with S.Tr. No. 207 of 2010, arising out of Bheldi P.S.Case No. 3 of 2010. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) BTiwary/