'v . ^••u''^^•^.•^^S^W/^^^s^V^'^T*-^-1^' 3N THB H3QH GOOffl* OP MWBk \^.P. Ife ft&SSfff 1994 fep ^li y ^- ll.t.l;3; -^' i 1.? AMtd %tSta,S^ lateStei. ANul Saai, aged atsoa-t 45 years, Seyems SuperiHfe®dent (Bsase Tax Sec-fctOB) , Kaaieipal C@rB»r<ttoa, Baipup.' 2? Ollip Baaar ©hakrsnrorty,S^ late BF? Lalit 'KBnar ©bakra- var-fey, aged aloat 4gi yeaps, (Mark®ti%Sectioa), Manlelpal Sorr&ra-fcion, aaipur (M»P.) 3¥ RajSBdraTJ^ari, aged aboat Q years, Moharir, MayUslpal Qarparattaa, BajEps' (M.P.) VaFsas 11 Sta-feeofMadhya ttaE'augh Seorefcgpy, of Laoal S®l;eQev^'aaeat, GQvywieQt Qt Maahya P2*adesh, Btopal (W.P.) 2'i> Muniej.f&l G$rp®?atl®B» SaI.SHt* 1?h2?oagh eaaniss:i®ner,BixalsiBall GoFieratl.oa, BaiEW (M*P.) AR'BSKB 2215/227 fS'ESVESSdK '*StK!SXt XI-HC-78 ^E^T '-«i<4irt«,y-ci1'(-i<id, firtK-iy^ TPT5?T®HT^.W.;P...^fti.-S'.fc^.(:7./..?.tr 3n^?TCR<P(ljc|i'jc|^) ^200 3fl^CT!Rrfcl'tit|>, tTSlT3IRSTsR'n<R "\.- Sarma SraTtR^Tf^T an^ST 14.07.2005 None appears fpr the petitioher. Mr. Arun Sao, leamed respondentNo.1. (piitn'ili *iwwY^''fet<il '(RIWK ^3Tf^T3II^S7 ' Py. Govemment Advocate for None appears for the respoi|ident No.2. The present petltion, filecj Constitutlon of India, challengl 27.07.1994 whereby transferring | Revenue Inspector from Municipal| Corporation, Sagar, Satna and Dfjrg rsspedively. White issuing flotices on 09.08.1994, the High C|ourt of Madhya Pradesh directed that if the petitioners were not re posting, the operation of the imppgned order (Annexure P-12) of their transfers was stayed until fui|ther orders. The services of the petitioners were stayed and as sj under Article 226/227 of the 3s the transfer order dated the petittoners to the post of Corporation, Raipurto Municipat ieved from the present place of Lich relief claimed in the petition has been grantedby way of interii^ order. The employer is always free to transfer the employee within the area except in case of malafide exercise of power etc. /l<fter a periodof 11 years, it is not necessary to interfere with the otder dated 27.07.1994 when the said order was stayed. , The petitioner has becom petition is dismissed. e infruetuous and as such the Sd/- SatisfaK.Aanihofri Judge ^ ^' -s-acnaaffi..;;