IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.49900 of 2008 DINESH RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.12.2008 Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner, Sri Kamal Deo Sharma, Advocate for the Informant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The case is under Section 307 etc IPC and 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner is said to be the order giver upon which one Rajdeo Rai is said to have fired and caused injury to the informant. Whereafter there is a general and omnibus allegation against all accused persons of dealing blows with chura to the brother of the informant. The learned counsel appearing for the informant has resisted the prayer for bail submitting that it was a case of Rangdari that the petitioner had demanded a sum of Rs.1,000/- on the very day of the occurrence and the facts have been collected during the course of investigation but the order which was passed by the learned Sessions Judge was passed after having heard the matter on earlier day and thereafter passing the order after reserving the same because the first line of the order says - 2 - that the record was put up for orders before him on 22.11.2008. In spite of such long and deep brooding over the material and application of mind to the facts, the learned Sessions Judge has not pointed out to this Court as to what were the materials which were submitted by the learned counsel for the informant. Regard being had to the facts and the fact that the petitioner is the order giver, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.3,000/-(three thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in Brahmpur P.S.Case No.97 of 2008. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )