IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19728 of 2011 KAUSHALYA DEVI, W/O SRI PRAMOD NARAYAN SINGH, R/O SHIVPUR COLONY, G.T. ROAD MOHANIA, AT PRESENT MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RATWAR-3, P.S. MOHANIA, DISTRICT-KAIMUR, AT BHABUA ……….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, H.R.D. DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, VIKAS BHAWAN, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA-15 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KAIMUR, (BHABUA) 4. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SADAR, BHABUA 5. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, KAIMUR, BHABUA 6. DISTRICT TEACHERS EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KAIMUR, BHABUA 7. PRAKHAND VIKAS PADADHIKARI, BHABUA, DISTRICT- KAIMUR 8. ANITA KUMARI W/O ABHISHEK KUMAR, R/O VILLAGE- SHEOPUR, MOHANIA, P.S. MOHANIA, DISTRICT- KAIMUR, BHABUA 9. UMA SHANKAR RAM, S/O RAMAWTAR RAM, R/O VILLAGE- BHARIGAMA BARI, DISTRICT- ROHTAS ………….Respondents ----------- 2. 16.11.2011 The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 16.5.2011 passed in Appeal No. 60 of 2011 and order dated 29.06.2011 passed in Appeal No. 102 of 2011. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the Tribunal has passed the order of appointment in favour of the respondent nos. 8 & 9 wrongly treating it to be a case falling under the second category as enumerated in the letter of the Human Resources and Development Department as contained in Annexure-4 to the writ petition. Learned counsel for the State is present and has been heard. In the opinion of this Court, the present writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate, Kaimur (Respondent no.3) to take expeditious steps to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 13.09.2011 pending before him (Annexure no. 8 to the writ petition), wherein the petitioner has narrated his grievances. Needless to say such representation shall be disposed of after hearing the parties and by a speaking order in accordance with law. It is also expected that no coercive action will be taken against the petitioner until disposal of the representation as aforesaid. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Fahad. ( Vikash Jain, J. )