hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLEATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 549 OF 2011 The State of Maharasthra ... Applicant Versus Kiran Ashok Bhosale ... Respondent Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATED : JULY 22, 2011 P.C. Heard perused record. The deceased Sushma was wife of respondent Kiran Bhosale. The respondent was prosecuted and charged for the offences punishable under section 498A and 306 of I.P.C. The deceased died due to 84% burn injuries. The defence of respondent was that he too tried to save his wife and suffered 40% burn injuries. The trial court after consideration of the evidence, acquitted the accused/respondent. After perusal of the evidence on record and the defence taken by the respondent, we find that the view adopted by the trial court does not call for interference by this court. The conclusions reached by the trial court are reasonable and proper. The view adopted by the trial court is a possible view of the matter. There is no infirmity in the same. There is no merit in the appeal. Leave refused. Application rejected. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.)