IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15984 of 2009 1. SATYENDRA SHARMA S/O LATE RAMADHIN SHARMA R/O VILL- CHANDRA NAGAR, P.O- KOSHI COLLEGE, KHAGARIA, P.S- MUFFASIL, DISTT- KHAGARIA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, VISHWASHERAIYA BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA-1 3. ENGINEER IN CHIEF, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, VISHWASHERAIYA BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 4. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DIVISION (CIRCLE), LAHERIASARAI, DISTT- DARBHANGA 5. CHIEF ENGINEER (MECHANICAL) VISHWASHARAIYA BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MECHANICAL DIVISION, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DIVISION, KHAGARIA 7. SRI PARMESHWAR PANDIT (FOREMAN) S/O NOT KNOWN OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MECHANICAL DIVISION ROAD CONSTRUCTION DIVISION (MECHANICAL) BHAGALPUR 8. SRI RANA KIRAN KUMAR SINGH, FOREMAN S/O NOT KNOWN OFFICE OF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CENTRAL WORK SHOP, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DIVISION (MECHANICAL) SHEIKHPURA, PATNA-14 ----------- 2. 24.12.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner claims appointment under the work charge establishment and subsequent induction into a regular establishment in February 1981. While his juniors have been granted promotion to the post of Foreman, notwithstanding certain recommendations in his favour also for such promotion he alleges discrimination. His representations having evoked no response he was compelled to approach under the Right to Information Act which furnished information that there is no provision for promotion of an employee who has worked under work charged establishment without dealing his claim for regularisation and recommendation he alleges in his favour. This Court is not satisfied to dismiss the writ application on the basis of information furnished to the petitioner on 25.2.2008 under the Right to Information Act. On the submission of the petitioner the order dated 25.2.2008 raises more question than it answers. The writ application is disposed with a liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed fresh representation urging all grounds of fact as presently placed before this Court and which is required to be disposed by a reasoned and speaking order on all grounds that the petitioner raises in support of his claim as also the charges of discrimination. Let the same be done within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)