IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8567 of 2011 Ram Shewak Singh …Petitioner Versus 1. The Administrator, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Birchand Patel Path, Pariwahan Bhawan, Patna, Bihar. 2. The Chief Administrator, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Birchand Patel Path, Pariwahan Bhawan, Patna, Bihar. 3. The Conducting Officer, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation 4. The Divisional Manager, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Purnea. …Respondents ----------- 03. 21.07.2011 Both sides present. No counter affidavit has been filed. Learned counsel for the Respondent-Bihar State Road Transport Corporation(for short ‘the Corporation’) submits that if the facts stated in the writ petition are correct, then the petitioner has a case as nobody can be punished twice for the same charge/allegation. He, however, submits that the route on which the petitioner was employed as Conductor, is a long route and there may be a case of two inspections at two different points. In his submission the matter requires to be examined by the respondents. Having heard the parties and on perusal of materials on record, this Court finds that prima facie the petitioner has been able to make out a case for interference as the petitioner was already proceeded against and awarded punishment for which he has again been suspended in contemplation of departmental proceeding. 2 In the light of submissions advanced on behalf of the parties and on going through materials on record, this Court disposes of the present application by the following order: Let the respondent concerned dispose of the representation filed by the petitioner (Annexure-5). Petitioner shall also produce copy of the aforesaid representation together with a copy of the present order before the said respondent within three weeks enabling the Respondent-Administrator to consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law. Till the representation of the petitioner is disposed of by the Respondent-Administrator, the order contained in Annexure-4 shall not be given effect to. In other words, the order contained in Annexure-4 shall abide by the order of the Respondent-Administrator to be passed on the representation of the petitioner. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )