1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.18 OF 2009 Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. Shivgovind V. Singh & ors. ...Respondents. Mrs. Priya Crasto for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 17th JUNE, 2009. P.C.- 1 None appears for the respondents. 2 Considering the averments made and as there is no dispute and denial to the averments made in the present petition with regard to the vehicle involved in the matter, this makes position of the petitioner very clear that the respondents failed to make payment regularly and they are defaulter. 3 This court has granted ad-interim relief in terms of prayer (c) 2 except bracketed portion by order dated 1st October, 2008. 4 The learned counsel for the petitioners makes statement that inspite of all steps taken they are not in a position to trace out the vehicle in question till this date. Neither the respondents are disclosing the same. 5 The matter is pending before the Arbitral Tribunal also. 6 This court has already appointed Receiver in terms of prayer (c). 7 In view of this, I am inclined to allow this petition as prayed. The interim order in terms of prayer (c) already granted shall continie till further orders and or the order, if any passed by the Tribunal on the application moved by the petitioner. 8 The petition is accordingly allowed with liberty to the respondents including to furnish security to the extent of amount involved and/or to settle the matter. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)