HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 246/2010 (S/S) Rajendra Singh and others. …Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …Respondents. Shri Hari Mohan Bhatia, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri R.C. Arya, learned Brief Holder for the State/respondent nos. 1 to 3. Shri Sudhir Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.4. Dated: April 15, 2010 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners have filed the present writ petition praying that a writ of mandamus be issued to the respondents to consider the petitioner’s application for appointment on the post of L.T. (TGT) Teacher in Physical Education on the basis of the advertisement issued in the year 2002 for Kumaon Division and the advertisement issued in the year 2004 for Kumaon as well as Garhwal Divisions. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that a writ no.95(S/S)/2009 was filed praying for similar relief, in which Special Appeal no.240/2009 was also filed and both the writ petition and Special Appeal were decided by an order dated 8th March, 2010 holding that the petitioners in the said writ petition were eligible for consideration against the advertised post in L.T. grade teacher in Physical Education. The petitioners in the present writ petition have therefore, prayed that a similar relief may also be granted to them. Learned counsel for the petitioners prayed that petition be disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners in the light of 2 judgment passed in Special Appeal No. 240/2009. Learned Brief Holder does not have any objection if such an order is passed. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the petitioners would move an appropriate application before the authority concerned for consideration of their applications in terms of the judgment dated 08.03.2010 passed in the case of Prakash Bhatt and another Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others in Special Appeal no.240/2009. If such an application is filed enclosing the judgment and claiming similarity and parity with the said judgment, the authority concerned will consider and decide the same within two weeks by reasoned and speaking order and if the petitioners are found to be eligible, their applications would be considered as per the advertisement. Interim relief application also stands disposed of. Let certified copy of the order be supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioners today itself on payment of usual charged. (V.K. Bist, J.) 15.04.2010 NCM: