IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 12263 of 2009 Between: 1 Narsing Rao, S/o. Late R.narayana Swamy, R/o. H.No.10-1-611/52, West Marredpally, Secunderabad. 2 K.Nagesh, S/o. late R.Narayana Swamy, R/o. H.no.10-1-611/52, West Marredpally, Secunderabad. 3 R.Andaloo, W/o. Late R.Anand, R/o. H.No.20-516, Ekalavyanagar Malkajgiri, Ranga Reddy District. 4 Smt. yadalaxmi, W/o. T.Rama Rao, R/o. 10-1-611/52, West Marredpally, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Commissioner, GHMC of Hyderabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Addl. Municipal Commissioenr, Secunderabad Division, Circle No.4, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction one more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring inaction of the respondents in mutating their names in the records passing orders on the representations made by the petitioner are illegal improper, violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents to mutate the names of the petitioners in all the records forth with and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.SRINIVASA SHARMA Counsel for the Respondent No.: R.RAMACHANDRA REDDY,SC FOR MCH 1,2,4&6 The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No : 12263 of 2009 O R D E R : The petitioners herein claim to be absolute owners and possessors of the property bearing House No.10-1-611/52 West Marredpally, Secunderabad. It is stated that their title has also been upheld by the judgment and decree dated 02.02.2007 passed by the Court of the I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad in a suit for partition in O.S.No.137 of 2005. Pursuant to the above said decree, the petitioners made applications dated 26.07.2007 requesting the second respondent herein for mutation of their names in the records enclosing all the relevant documents to substantiate the title acquired by them. However, in spite of several requests made by them, the respondents failed to consider their applications and the mutation has not been effected so far. Aggrieved by the said inaction on the part of the respondents, the present writ petition is filed. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri R.Ramachandra Reddy, learned standing counsel, who accepted notice on behalf of the respondents submitted that the applications of the petitioners for mutation would be considered in accordance with law. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to the title claimed by the petitioners, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioners dated 26.07.2007, received in the office of the respondents on 31.07.2007 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J Dated: 29-06-2009 KLP