IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5451 OF 2004 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.162 OF 2004 Subhash Sadashiv Karkhanis ...Applicant Versus Dimple S.Kalyani & Anr. ...Respondents ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5452 OF 2004 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.163 OF 2004 Subhash Sadashiv Karkhanis ...Applicant Versus Mrs.Rupali S.Shah & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Chatuphule i/b Mr.G.S.Castelino for Applicant. Mr.Prakash Naik for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.R.Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DECEMBER 8, 2004. DECEMBER 8, 2004. DECEMBER 8, 2004. : 2 : P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. In view of the report of Mrs.M.R.Bhatkar, Registrar (Judicial), no further order is required. 2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. It is seen that against the order dated 15th March 2002, Applicant preferred appeal, which came to be dismissed on 5th November 2003. Immediately in January 2004, the Applicant was advised to file Writ Petition and accordingly, Writ Petition came to be filed being Criminal Writ Petition No.102 of 2004, which however, was withdrawn on 16th April 2004, as the proper remedy would have been Revision Application. This Court granted liberty to the Petitioner to take recourse to remedy of Revision Application. The present Revision Applications have been instituted on 27th April 2004. In the circumstances, the delay in filing the Revision Applications deserves to be condoned, as the Applicant preferred proceedings before the competent Court under wrong advise of his Advocate. Accordingly, delay in filing Criminal Revision : 3 : Applications is condoned. Criminal Revision Applications be placed for admission on 13th December 2004. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.