HIGHCpURTOFJUDJCATUf^AtBllj^PURiCilhjAT^ SSNGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, C.J. WRITPETJTION N0,5937 PF.^2^^^^ PETJTiONER RESPONDENTS Versus 1. 2. Prem Chand Jain, son of Shri IDhannalal Jain, aged about 65 j^ars, resident of A-14 Green Park jExtension, Behind Uphaar Cinema, ]New Delhi, Presently residing at jRaipur. jState of Chhattisgarh.through the secretary, Department of Town & Country Planning, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. Raipur Development Authority, Raipur, througlli the Chief Executive Officer, R.D.A. BuildJng, Shastri Chowk, Raipur. ^ Present: Shri Ajit Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Uttersh Verma, learned Dy. G.A. for the State, Shri Pankaj Agrawal, learned counsel for respondent No.2. (ORALORDER) (Passed on 31st July, 2006) Atthough, in the prayer, a direcfion is sought to the respondents to grant 'no objection certificate' for the use and enjoyment of the lease hold plots of the land, as mentionej in the lease deed (Annexure-P/1),; at the time of hearing, learned oounsd fbr the petitioner would confine the|relief to issuance of a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the representations of the petitioner marked as Ann^<ure-P/2 series. (2) Having heard tearned counsel for the parties, it dispose of the writ petition directing the second respondent to dispose of the above applications of the petitloner, ifnot aiready done, in accordancewith law, within a period ofone month from the date of receipt of a oopy of this order ,No oosts. Sd/- Chief Justice