IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1042 of 2009 TILA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 3.9.2010 KHAN The petitioner submits that her husband Brahmchari Mandal was brutally killed by the accused persons for which Kharik P.S.Case No.142 of 2008 was instituted under section 302/34 of the Penal Code. The grievance of the petitioner is that the statement of the eye witnesses were not taken and the statement of only such person were taken who were closely related to the accused persons. The petitioner submits that the police conducted the investigation unfairly under influence of the accused persons and submitted final form in favour of the accused persons and charge-sheeted two new persons who are not even suspected by the informant. Counsel for the State submits that the police conducted the investigation fairly. The petitioner claims herself to be an eye witness of the occurrence. It appears that a protest cum complaint has been filed by the petitioner. In the circumstances, it would be open to the petitioner to pursue her protest cum complaint before the learned Magistrate, who would dispose of the same at an early date. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ application stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J) 2