IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2010 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 11744 of 2010(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MR.BRISTOW ROSE JOSEPH, S/O.P.JOSEPH, AGED 26 YEARS, SURABHI (H), PEROLE, NILESWAR P.O., KASARGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.RAMKUMAR NAMBIAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, TENHIPALAM, KOZHIKODE. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, KOZHIKODE. SHRI P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.11744/2010-P ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 6th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a student of the Institute of Engineering and Technology, Calicut University. He joined the course in 2002 and was in the 2002-06 batch. Since he had not cleared all the papers in his fifth semester examination, he had applied for the supplementary Examination June, 2009 for the following papers:- i. Soft Engineering [M.E 2K 501] ii. Dynamics of Machinery [M.E 2K 502] iii. Heat and Mass Transfer [M.E 2K 504] 2. On publication of the results, it was found that the petitioner had failed in all the three papers. He thereafter submitted application for revaluation after remitting the prescribed fees. Ext.P2 is the copy of the application for revaluation and Ext.P3 is the copy of the chalan evidencing the payment of the prescribed fees. It is the case of the petitioner that in case the results are not in his favour, he will have to appear again for the supplementary examinations in June 2010, which is the last chance for the petitioner and, any delay in publication of W.P.(C). No.11744/2010 -:2:- the results would affect his future prospects. Seeking for a direction to the respondents to complete the process of revaluation and publish the results within a time frame, this writ petition has been filed. 3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the University. There will be a direction to the respondents to complete the process of revaluation of the answer papers of the petitioner, if the application for revaluation along with the requisite fee covered by the chalan have been received and are in order, and communicate the result thereof, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE