IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 16.07.2010 C.R.No.3894 of 2010 Rajesh ...Petitioner Versus Haryana Organics ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the learned first Appellate Court on 05.06.2010, whereby an application for grant of ad interim injunction seeking restrain order against the defendant to supply the liquor to the petitioner in terms of the contract, was dismissed. Such contract is not specifically enforceable and therefore, the remedy of the petitioner is to seek damages even if such contract has been violated. In view of the above, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the order passed by the learned first Appellate Court, which may warrant any interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Dismissed. 16.07.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE