^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J Applicants Appellants Respondents M.C.C.No. 875 of 2011 1. Daymati W/o Late Banshi Yadav, aged about 38 years, R/o Bastar, Tahsil Jagdalpur, District-Bastar (C.G.) 2. Basant KumarjS/o Late Banshi Yadav, aged about 24 years, R/o Bastar, Tahsil-Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) 3. Sukhchand S/o Late Banshi Yadav, aged about 16 years, R/o Bastar, Tahsil-Jagdalpur, District-Bastar (C.G.) minor through natural guardian mother Smt. Daymati, appellant No.1 Versus 1 Bhajjiram @ Bhajram Jena S/o Srinath Jena, occupation-Driver, Behind Atithi Lodge, Jagdalpur, District-Bastar (C.G.) Vehicle Driver 2 Jitendra Singh Tomar S/o Keshav Singh Tomar, R/o Shantinagar Ward Jagdalpur, District-Bastar (C.G.) Vehicle Owner 3. Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Limited, Upper of the Central Bank Jagdalpur, District-Bastar (C.G.) Insurance Company ApDlication for restoration of Misc. Appeal (C) No.749 of 201 O Present : Shri Subhash Yadav, counsel for the petitioners. ORDER (18th December, 2011) ^<^: 1 ?~TsffllJ Y ^-y "•-ss^ssg^^ M.C.C.No. 875 of 2011 '<>.' subbu The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri Subhash Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners is heard on the restoration petition. 2) The petitioners are seeking restoration of M.A.C. No.749 of 2010 which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide orderdated 14.11.2011. 3) On due consideration of fhe submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, we are satisfied that the absence of the petitioners' / appellants' counsel on 14.11.2011, when M.A.C. No. 749 of 2010 was taken up for hearing was based on bona fide grounds. 4) M.C.C. No. 875 of 2011, therefore, is allowed and M.A.C. No.749 of 2010 is restored to its original number. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- R.N.Chandrakar Judge