IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 21147 of 2008 Between: 1 Raja Bahadur Venkata Rama Reddy Educational Society, Hanuman Tekdi,Abids, Hyderabad. Rep by its Secretary, Mr.G.Ramachandra Reddy. 2 Raja Bahadur Venkata Rama Reddy Institute of Technology, Hanuman Tekdi,Abids, Hyderabad. Rep by its Secretry, Mr.G.Ramachandra Reddy, 3 G.Ramachandra Reddy, S/o. Shankar Reddy, 24 B N Reddy Colony, Raod No.14, Banjara hills, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of A.P., Higher and Technical Education Department, Rep by its Principal Secreary, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabd. 2 AP State Council for Higher Education Rep by its Secretary, Masabtank, Hyderabad. 3 Commissioner & Directorate of Technical Educational, BRKR Buildings, Hyderabad. 4 Convener-I-CET-2008(Admissions), APHCE, Hyderabad, 5 Osmania University, Rep by its Registrar, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, order or direction, one more particualrly in thenature of a "Writ of Mandamus" declaring the actoin ofthe1st respondent in not recognising the approval granted by the AICTE in Fie No.07/05/AP/MCA/2002/028 Dated 4-9-2008 and in not including the 2nd petitioner institution in the list of aproved institutions by allotting student as being ilegal, arbitrary, uncostitutinal and cosnequently directthe rspondents to forthwith recognize the approval of the AICTE granted in favour of the 2nd petitioner institution and include the 2nd petitioner institution in the list of approved institutions by allotting students bygranting permissin or in the alternative permit the petitioners to fill up the seats and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI W.P NO.21147 OF 2008 ORDER It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. --------------- G.ROHINI,J 28th APRIL 2009 *TSNR