IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.97 of 2009 RAM PRIT RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 30.01.2009. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that predecessor trial court vide order dated 3.9.2008, passed by Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Fast Track Court No. V, Chapra in Sessions Trial No. no. 253 of 2007, find it expedient to consider the supervision note for just disposal of application under section 227 of the Cr.P.C. but on the other hand the successor judge observed that there is no necessity of perusal of supervision note for disposal of the aforesaid same application. I may have interfered with the aforesaid order had not the trial judge seen the supervision note, as such, the question whether it was necessary or not, becomes redundant. In the circumstances, I do not find any merit in the revision application. It is rejected as such. Shashi. (S.P.Singh,J)