IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 465 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 120 OF 2006 SHRI DASHRATH K.KAMBLI AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus THE GOA UNIVERSITY THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR, TALEIGAO PLATEAU-GOA & ANR ... Respondent Mr. D. J. Pangam, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. S. Vahidulla, Additional Government Advocate for the respondent no.2. Coram:- B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 29th June, 2009 P.C. Heard. Mr. Vahidulla, learned Additional Government Advocate is opposing the prayer for amendment. He is seeking time to obtain instructions. Considering the formal nature of the amendment, we allow the same. Necessary amendment be carried out by 13.07.2009. Liberty to the respondents to carry out consequential amendment, if any by 27.07.2009. B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. U. D. SALVI, J. lh/.