HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH : WRITPETmQNJSlNO^^^^ RESPONDENTS 1. Parmanand ChQudhary. S/o Shri Shankar Lal Choudhary, aged about 48 years, R/o vijjage Banslya, Post Tarkela, Tahsli & District Raigarh (CG). 2. Manjuiaia Slngh, D/o Pratap Singh, aged about 47 years, R/o Dhimrapur, First Bridge Near Suzuki Show Room, Ralgarh, District Raigarh (CG). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The District Education Officer. Raigarh, (Writ petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Slngie Bench: Hon'bie Shri Satlsh K. AgnihoSri, J. Present:- Shri Somkant Verma. counsel for the petitioners. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Advocate General forthe State. Gowri ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 25tn day of February, 2009) Shri Y.S. Thakur, learned Dy. Advocate Genera! appearing for the subm'rts that the impugned order dated 15-9-2008 (Annexure-P/2) has admittedly been passed without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Shri Thakur further submits that the State shall recajl the order and the State may be granted liberty to take appropriate steps after issuing show cause notice and affording an opportunity of hearing to the petltioners, in accordance with iaw. In view of the above categoricat statement made by the iearned Dy. Advocate General. according to learned counsei for the petitioners nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the petition stands dssposed of with the aforesaid iiberiy. Consequently. interim order passed eariier stands discharged and the pending appSications, if any, also stand disposed of. Sd/- . . SatishK.Ag"'110*" Judge