IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5268 of 2010 Kumar Devendra Dixit, son of Late Keshav Chandra Dixit and husband of Late Kumari Indu Mishra, resident of village Kilpur, P.O. Kabirpur, P.s. Nawatan, District- Siwan (Bihar). …………. Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar 2.Mr.Ashutosh Kumar, the Director, Primary Education, Department of Human Resources Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.Mr. Niwas Chandra Tiwari, the Regional Deputy Director of Education, Department of Human Resources Development, Govt. of Bihar, Saran Division, Chapra 4.Mr. Lokesh Kumar, the District Magistrate-cum- Chairman, District Level Compassionate Committee, Siwan, District- Siwan 5.Mr.Bashistha Narain Jha, the District Superintendent of Education, Siwan, District- Siwan. ………… Opp.Parties ---------------------------------- 4. 20/10/2011 By order dated 9.7.2010 writ application of the petitioner, namely, C.W.J.C.No.935 of 2007 was allowed with a direction to the respondents to take final decision and pass appropriate orders for appointment of the petitioner in terms of the resolution of the District Compassionate Committee within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the order. The said order was produced by the petitioner before the authorities on 2.8.2010. No final order having been passed, petitioner filed this contempt application on 22.12.2010. When the matter was taken up on 9.2.2011, 2 opposite parties were allowed four weeks time to file their show cause. In compliance to the said order, a show cause has been filed by the opposite parties. Along with the show cause, letter no.2955 dated 22.6.2009 issued by the Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms has been annexed as Annexure-A. From this letter it appears that all the departments were directed to make appointment on compassionate grounds as per the provisions of Rule 10 of 2006 Rules. Hence, by letter dated 30.8.2010 petitioner was asked to submit his consent for his appointment on the post of Prakhand Teacher on a fixed pay in terms of 2006 Rules and Government instructions. Admittedly, petitioner has not furnished his consent to the authorities till now. Hence, no appointment letter has been issued to the petitioner. In the above facts and circumstances, this Court does not find that a case of contempt is made out. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)