IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16878 of 2009 DR.JAINUL MIAN @ JAINUL ABEDIN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 11.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner along with co-accused has been alleged for hurling bomb upon the deceased resulting into his death. The defence of the petitioner is on two folds- firstly, the co-accused coming from Koeri caste were inimical to this petitioner and secondly, the witnesses were there to state remaining this petitioner at Garahawa from 4.30 PM of the day of the occurrence till next day that is the alibi. Petitioner is social worker having influence in the society for its welfare that is seen here in the court also as the learned APP appearing for the State also is aware of the statement made in his favour while statements of witnesses are there in paragraphs 3, 9 and 10 of the case diary though paragraph 3 of the case diary is further statement of the informant but paragraphs 9 and 10 of the case diary are the version of the prosecution - 2 - witnesses, may be from the family of the informant but there was no cause to falsely implicate this petitioner by these witnesses. Considering the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI