SSRII ,^^ ^ &'iKE F y i^ £s ^ :?' ;: '^."iurW'ff F) IN THE HIGHCOURT OF 3UDICATUERE AT BILASPUR fC.G.) W.P.NO. ^-/32_ f2QQS PETmONER ^ / Smt. Phool Bai Yadav, Widow of , ^...^^ ...-^" .^f" ....••••"" R/o- Village -Kapan, District Janjgir- ^si^ ^y""' Narayan prasad, aged about 60 years, R/o- Village -Kapan, Champa (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS A. State of Chhattisgarh Through-the Secretary, Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) /l. Sub-Divisional OfPcer Public Works Department, Janjgir- Champa, District- Janjgir Champa (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER AR7ICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA. XI-HC-78 3^ •:iTpn?pT, ®Tflu'is,Ri<ni*fy __ k/.A )J(. -Z-7'3'2-^ *ll*4dl sh*<|ch •"••••••"••••••"•• ^- 200 s^ 3T1^?Tiatn (l^cli^'!<^!ST) sn^r^TfeNi gsn'sii^Tstiiiiqi Bablu ?^rrw(rf?cT3ii^T 8.1.20)7 . F.5. are ond Mr. petitioner's. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, ts. Witii the consent of lear^ied counsel for the parties, the matters are heard finatly ond di^osed of^ Order dictated in W.P. passed separately <t>i<<Fci<fl-i iii(iTfff&€l'<Rf+<;i< ^ai^rsn^r Anoop Mazumdar, Advocates for the ©ovemment Advocate for thi (s) No. 6004 of 2006 in open Court, Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge HI6H COURT OF OWATnSGAW AT BTLASKJPt W. P. (5) No. 6004 of 2006 Petitioner : Smt. Re^tam Bai Verais Respondents : Stnte of ChhcrttiS9arh ond onother W. P. (51 hto. 2732 of 2006 Petrtioner : Smt. Phool Bai Ydav Verais Respondents : StatB of Chhatt'isgar+i and another W. P. (51 No. 7281 of 2006 Petitioner : BetiuroBai Versus Respondents : State of ChhcrttiS9ar+i and onother And W. P. CS1 No. 7282 of 2006 Petitmner : Triveni Prasad Versus Respondents : State of Chhffttisgarh ond another SB: Honlite Mr. Justice Sa+ish K. ^gnihotri. J Mr. F.S. are ond Mr. Anoop Mazumdar, Adwcutes for Ihe petitioners. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Sovemment Advocate for the respondents/State. ORbEft (Po.ssed on -this 8th cfay of January, 2007) The following order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agniholri. J. 1. Laamed counsel appearing for •the petitioners as well as leamed Deputy Sovemment Advocate eypearing for the respondents/State jointly submit •that the •fticts of tfae ore»ntcaseare similar to that c of in Writ Petition 108 of 2005 (fiovind Vs. 5-ha-te of Chhattisgarh A others), which was disposed of vide order dated 4 doy of Jonuar^, 2007. They further submit that -ffie question of law involved is olso the same. 2. In view of the abpve stated aibmisaons made by teamed counsel for the parties, these petitions are allowed in terms of the order da-hsd 4 doy of January, 2007 passed by this Court in Writ Petition 108 of 2005. No order as to costs. 3. A, copy of this order be pfaced on record in other connected writ petitions. — Bablu Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge '•SSSS'ifffb'U2 lLlT lLiLl"" l i