Crl.M. No. M-2107 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-2107 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 9.2.2011 ... Mohinder Pal ................Petitioner vs. State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. D.S. Pheruman, Advocate for the petitioner Sh. A.S. Rai, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. ... K.C. Puri, J. Petitioner - Mohinder Pal s/o Shital Parkash has applied for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 156 dated 15.9.2010, under Sections 419, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Patti, District Tarn Taran. The allegation against the petitioner is that he got the sale deed in his favour from Hakam Singh The matter regarding death certificate of Hakam Singh, was dealt with by the Collector, Amritsar vide order dated 28.2.2006 (Annexure P-3). In the revenue record Hakam Singh has been recorded as owner. The son of Hakam Singh has also given an affidavit that sale deed is correct. In the Jamabandi's Crl.M. No. M-2107 of 2011 -2- for the year 1993-94 also the name of Hakam Singh has been recorded as owner to the extent of ½ share. The civil suit is stated to be pending since 2004 raising controversy regarding the death of Hakam Singh in the year 1984. The possession according to the FIR is also stated to be that of petitioner. So, without going into the controversy regarding the death of Hakam Singh, in my view, it is a fit case to allow the concession of anticipatory bail. Consequently, the petition stands accepted. In the event of arrest, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail to the satisfaction of the trial court on complying with the following conditions:- i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation, as and when required, by the police; ii)that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and iii)that the petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. ( K.C. Puri ) 9.2.2011 Judge chugh