HIGH cOURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 5259 OF 2007 PETITIONER Dr. Shashi Bhushan Sac, Slo Late Shri Prabhu Ram $ao, aged about 50 years, presentiy working as Medical Officer, Employees State tnsuranea'- Corporation, ESIC Hospital, Raipur, R/o Shanti Nagar, Raipur (CG). Versus w, 1. State of M.P., through Secretary, Labour Department, Valiabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP). 2. Regionat Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation, Nanda Nagar, M.P. Region, Indore (MP). 3. State of C.G., through Secretary, Labour Department, D.K.S. Bhawan. Raipur (CG). Regional Director, Directorate Employees State insurance Corporation, Ministry of Labour, Chhattisgarh Region, Tagore Nagar, Raipur (CG). (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri N.K. Vyas, counsel for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State of Chhattisgarh. None for other respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 9‘“ day of September, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the servioe reoord of the petitioner is pending with the respondents No.1 & 2. The petitioner has made a representation before the respondent No.2 on 19-$-2006 (Annexure—PI1 5). The petitioner restricts his prayer that the respondent No.2 may be directed to consider and decide his representation dated 199-2006 (Annexure-P/15), in accordance with law, on its own merits, within the stipulated time. 2) Since the service records of the petitioner are lying with the respondents No.1 & 2, the respondents No.3 & 4 cannot take any decision on the issue involved in the case. 3) Despite servi¢e of notice, the respondent No.2 has chosen not to appear before the Court. Thus‘ in the light of pending representation dated 19-9-2006 (Annexure-Pl15), it is ordered that the respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4) ln view of the foregoing, according to leamed counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication. 5) Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. 6) Consequently, pending applications, if any, also stand disposed . Eowri Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotrt Judge