1 Lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1521 OF 2010 Shri Nalin Kapadia : Petitioner versus The Institute of Actuaries of India and ors. : Respondents. Mr. Kirit Hakani for the Petitioner Ms. S K Shrivastava i/by M/s.Consulta Juris for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : A M KHANWILKAR & R M SAVANT, JJ DATED : 08th April 2010 P.C. 1. The principal grievance in this Petition is that although the disciplinary proceedings have been commenced as back as in the year 2009 against the Respondent No.4, the same are not taken to its logical end so far. 2. In response to this grievance, the Respondent No.1 has filed affidavit stating that Respondent No.3 has already submitted his report to the Disciplinary Authority. It is now for the Disciplinary Authority to take appropriate decision as may be advised in the matter. 2 3. If it is so, we would dispose of this Petition with directions to the Disciplinary Authority to expeditiously conclude the proceedings and pass final order as may be advised. That be done not later than three months from today. 4. In view of this, the Petitioner does not press other grounds amongst others relating to the appointment of Respondent No.3 as Inquiry Officer at this stage and seeks liberty to raise those grounds at the appropriate stage if and when the occasion arises. 5. In the circumstances, Petition is disposed of on the above terms with liberty to the Petitioner as prayed for. (R M SAVANT, J.) (A M KHANWILKAR, J)