BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifteenth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12228 of 2011 1 JAWAHAR 2 B.SARAVANAN 3 KOUS 4 S.CHANDRASEKAR 5 MUSTHAFA 6 KADAR BATCHA 7 IBRAHIM 8 M.ANWAR 9 R.SHANMUGAM ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE FORT POLICE STATION, TRICHY CITY. CRIME NO.1069/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : M/S.S.MUTHUKRISHNAN ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MR.A.RAMAR ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC. 438 CR.P.C. ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- The petitioners/accused apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 448, 294(b), 324 and 506(II0 of IPC r/w Section 3 of PPD Act in Crime No.1069 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are arrayed as A13 to A21 and the petitioners are innocent persons and a false case has been foisted against them and the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 13.08.2011 and since the petitioners are load men, they raised the demand for wage increase and there was a dispute between the petitioners and the employer and A2 to A12 were already enlarged on bail and now the petitioners/A13 to A21 apprehend for arrest and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.Refuting the same, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the case has been registered against 21 persons and investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides, the petitioners are the load men and since they are raising the demand for increasing the wages, problem arose and they caused damage and the case has been registered on 13.08.2011 and A2 to A12 were already enlarged on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ bail and anticipatory bail and even though the petitioners were not arrested, they neither interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Trichy, and each of them executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-[Rupees Ten Thousand only] with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 15/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, TRICHY. 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY, 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, FORT POLICE STATION, TRICHY CITY. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC TO M/S.S.MUTHUKRISHNAN ADVOCATE SR.NO.31594. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12228 of 2011 Date :15/09/2011 2P/6C RPB 19.09.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/