IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27936 of 2009 1. TARKESHWAR YADAV 2. SETHO YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 13.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioners are accused in a case arising out of Sahebpur P.S. Case No. 41 of 2008 for offences under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is contended on behalf of the petitioners that the present case is an outcome of dowry dispute. It is further contended that although the occurrence even according to the informant took place on 3.3.2008, the complaint was instituted after inordinate delay of seven days on 10.3.2008 which was subsequently forwarded for registration under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure giving rise to the present case. It is further submitted that charge sheet has been submitted and the accusation under Section 364 has not been found to be true. It is further submitted that the petitioner no. 1 Tarkeshwar Yadav is in custody since 25.2.2009 and petitioner no. 2 Setho Yadav is in custody since 18.3.2009 for apparently no justified reason. It is further submitted that the victim boy returned his house on 4.3.2008 itself but the case was instituted after long delay which apparently shows that it is an afterthought. Having regard to the facts of the case, let the petitioners, namely, Tarkeshwar Yadav and Setho Yadav be released on bail upon each one of the petitioners individually furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Sahebpur P.S. Case No. 41 of 2008. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)