WP(C) 2684/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N.SARMA Heard Mr. R. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner. The subject matter of challenge in this writ petition is a NIT dated 11-5-09 iss ued by the President, Barpeta Zilla Parishad and the Chief Executive officer in viting tender, amongst others, for settlement of Kadong Beki Parghat falling und er the Mandia Anchalik Panchayat for the year 2008-2009. It is submitted that in terms of the decision rendered by the Full Bench of this Court reported in 2009 (2) GLT 561( Harez Ali vs. State of Assam ), the Mandia Anchalik Panchayat is not vested with the jurisdictional authority to issue the NIT in question. The learned State Counsel as well as the counsel for the private respondent who got himself impleaded, has no objection in allowing this writ petition by settin g aside the impugned NIT. In view of the principle of law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court refer red to above, the impugned NIT dated 11-5-2009, issued jointly by the President and the Chief Executive Officer of Barpeta Zilla Parishad, stands set aside and quashed. The NIT so issued by the Anchalik Panchayat shall hold the filed and a fter completion of necessary formalities the tender documents along with relevan t records shall be forwarded to the Barpeta Zilla Parishad for necessary settlem ent, inasmuch as, the value of the Parghat is beyond the permissible limit of An chalik Panchayat. This shall be done as early s possible preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. In view of the impugned order of settlement dated 24-6-2009 mad e in favour of the private respondent No. 7, the same stands set aside and quash ed. Writ petition stands disposed of.