IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 16726 of 2008. Decided on: 07.09.2010. __________________________________________________________ Sharb Chhopel. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening events. Consequently, the same is dismissed as infructuous, so also the pending application (s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 07, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?