HI§H €0URT OF €HHATTI$$ARH AT BILASPGR W. P.{5} N0. 1§31 of 260? Pefh‘mner Dqja Qam K%1are Aged wwf — 45 year‘s S/e. Shri Bamfr-am Khare, R/CL Kogir, P.G. Kosif, Tahsi! Sarangarh‘ Disft - Raigarh £615.) Vargas Qeiywdarxfs 1. Sfa’re af €hha?fisgarh Through:- 5ecr-efar'y, Schaai’ Educafimi Deparfmem, Man?ra!aya af D.K.$, Bhuwam Raipur (6.9) 2. Asst Commissioner Davelepmem‘ of TvShaS, Jnshpur, DisfT.-Jashpur- {Cafi} 5B: Hén’hla Mr. Jusfice Safésh K, Ags%iha+?i, J Present Mr. Ajif Singh, Advuca're for the peti‘rioner. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Pariel Law/2r fer 5+a‘re/Fesponden‘f. 0 R' D E R (Passzd on This 16"“ Day of March, 2007) 1. The pe‘i’i‘fimer' was appaiva‘fed vicie arder dwed 08.10.1986 (Amexure P/1) as Assiwafx'i’ Teacher an fExea pay scalé 6f Ra 300/—. A“F1’2F compie‘i‘im G‘f one year pmba‘fion, ha was gmrrtea' ragukxr pay $ccxRa of Rs. 975-i000f—. Learned Counsel appearing fér‘ ‘E’he pe‘H'Herier submifs *rha'i’ "the issue P)t invah/éd if} fhe arise is ash whefher‘, fhe pa‘fificper is ari‘i’ifkd + 5 reguhr‘ pay $cczle wzf. 'fhe dafe rrf ini‘i’ia! appoin‘fmen? w fr‘ém i‘ha uJai‘i'e 0f campk’riam of pr‘aba+iori period. K)R. 3. The issue inv:3§ved, harem was censicfered by 'E’he Madhya Pradash 5+a+2 Admiriis?ra'i’iva Tribuncd, Jabuipur' in QA. No. 2?45/89 (Médhukm‘rf Yadu arm! 56 ofhers Vs. Sh‘ta of MR & a+hers), whzreiri i'i' was he!d fha‘f ‘rhe simiiarly sifucx‘fad +2acher$ are eiifi‘Hed 1'6 regukxr' pay scale wzf. f'na dad'e of mii’iai appoifwmei‘ri’. The mafia? waS mkcaifl-up h ‘i‘he Hcn'bié Supreme Cam“? if: Specia! Leave Peirifkm (CWH) Ne. 5892/93. The said pefii’im wa$ dismisszd by fhe: Hm'hle Sufareme Caur‘i’ uphaiding +he decision of 'i'he Tvibuml +0 1'he Effecf Tiia‘i' ’i’he Teachers/Assisian‘i Teachér‘s we emi‘iiéd ‘ia reguiar pay smie fram ciai’é crf imi’iai gpfmii'i’rmen't o . Learned camsai apsaariag ”far The peiiiiemr fur’i'her submi‘i’s fhai’ iiiis CéLir‘i', whiig corisidering 'i'he same issue in Sushi! Tiwari oz cihérs Vs. Sfa‘i‘e 50v? sf Chhs‘i‘iisgarh i3: ofher‘s (WP‘ (5) N5. 5976 of 2006) by order éa‘i'ed 7—1E~2606, has granfad reguiar' pay swig wzif. iiie éo’i'e of irii‘i'ial sppoiri‘imerri’. Leariiad Counszi swearing for We par'iies joiofiy' submi'i iha‘r ihis csSé is squareiy covered by "ri’ie dzcision of ihis Couri is fhs case of 5usiiii Tiwnr‘i & oihars Vs. Siafe Govt oi Chimffisgarh & ofhers (Swami). L 1's View o‘F +i1ai 'i'his paiiiion is aiiowed iii 'ihe some “terms. No osdsi‘ as 1'9 cosis. W Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri J Judge M