+ ^) XI-HG—78 T5T '<<Ni<n4|, attl'M'is, fq<ni-kilj,< '^Wd Petitioner ResiDondents rc-ii 1. 2. 3. 5. Mr. Puait Ruparel, couitse Mr. Shashank Thakul-, PL| 'qpRTI' if 'fWt <r<l^l< ^affiwsn^i o.11860f2009 Umar I<haa, aged about 15 years, beiug minor fhrough his Natural Guardian, Muiutaj Khan, ageii about .48 years, S/o Late Moh. HanifKhan, R/o Calcutta Samaj Dhaba, Villa^e Bhaupuri, Post Penderi, Tahsil and Distt. Rajnaadgaou. ^ersus- The State ofChhattisgarh, ta:oiigh its Secretaiy Education Department, Raipur. Distt. Education Rajnaudgaon. Officer, Navia. High School, fhrough its Pruicipal, Bhanpuri, Raja Bhanpuri, Distt. Rajnandgaon. Siut, ShobhaajaU Shrivastava, Priticipal Navia High School, Bhanpuri, Raja Bhaapuri, Distt. Rajnaadgaon. Chhattisgarh Board of Secondary Education, fhrough its Secretary, Peusion Bada, Raipur. ^J for the petitioner, br fhe State. I-HG—78 ^ 7=! •^w\v\<i, ®ti1-kf<i(o,fs«niyy Sf^V •5BI WM 3- Miaor Uniar Khaii has natural guardiaii Mumtaj Kh^ui respondents No. 3 & 4 to allotv examination of Class-9th to be Ke] Grievance of the petitio^iei Class-8ttl examination from. K| Navada (Bihar). On the basi^ issued by fhe said iustitution, Naviu High School, Raja Bhai^ allowed to attend fhe classes Dista-ict Education Of&cer, Dis 17.11.2008 (Aiinexure P/3),a(j School, Bhanpuri, drrected tl^ attend.the classes aiid accordntis as the regular stadent. There^ Prmcipal, Govt. H^her Secon) on fh.e coiuplairtt of the petij enquiiy report fhaf respondeti| period of one aad half m.ont}i adnussion of fhe petitioner. anj Distnct Education Of&cer, Rj which deiaonstrates iaaction oi Leamed couasel for fhel was entitled for admissioa to CI *iifc(41'f iwraf'? fyzt <F!(<T;I< ^ pled the iiistaiit petition fhrough his and prayed for direction to the fhe petitioner to appear in fhe final |eld ia tiie month of March, 2009. |ier is that, the petitioner passed his [ajkiya Buiuyadi Vidyalaya, Kensarai, of laark-sheet aud other docuuients |fhe petitioner applied for admission ia |.puri, Distt, Rajnaadgaon aud he was ^f Class-9th as a regular student. The |tt. Rajnaadgaon vide his nienio dated ^dressed to the Pmicipal of Navin. High principal to allow the petitioner to igly, fhe petitioner attended fhe classes tfter, an euquiry was conducted by the laiy School, Surgi, Distt. Rajnaadgaon ioner, who has also obsei-ved in his No.3 did not take aay decision for a tiU 30th September, 2008 regardkis; i thcreafter, sought guidance froin the ijnaudgaon only after fhree nionths, fhe part ofthe respondent No.3. petitioner subinits that the petitioner ass-9th as lie h.as ah~?ady cleared Class- ^' 75T "t(l'lllCl*l, ®ti1-H<l<o,faiyiyy STI^TT^T 1^1 gw? j ^. qii<<[<i<i'ii 'wrcff if ie'^s <ra)<^i< ^TaiRpT cilrcu oaer tUe 8th examia.ati.on froia Navadi classes of Class-9t11 in Naviu However, the respondeuts are| the final honie examinatiou MaiTch, 2009. In these directed to aBow fhe petitioi]|f Class-9th. Heard leanied coiinsel After soing through therewith, considering fhat Class-9'11 by the Disti-ict Edu^ of Class-8th certificate issued 2 & 3 are directed to allowl examiuation of Class-9ul to However, it shaB be open to| regarding veracity of the ascertaiii th.at he passed Claj Vidyalaya, Kensarai, Navada The petition is, accordi|i, Consequently, IA No.O: (Bihar). He was atlowed to atteud the |High School, Bhanpuri/respondent No.3. not permittmg the petitiouer to appear ia bf Class-9t11 to be held ia fhe monfh of 1-cLLmstances, the respondents inay be to appear iu flie final examiaation of for the petitioner. petition aad fhe docum.ents annexed jthe petitioner was permitted to attend ;atiou Officer, Rajnaudgaon on fhe basis Ifroni Navada (Biliar), the respondents No. fhe petitioner to appear ia fhe annual |be held iu. fhe month of March, 2009. the respondents to couduct an}r euquiry' ci^rtificates produced by the petitioner to >s-8t11 examiaation froni Rajkiya Buniyadi [Bfliar). lijigly, disposed of also staiids disposed of. _^^ Sd/- , \ ^teendraMi^a