CWP (T) No. 8675/2008 26.02.2011 Present: Mr. D. P. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate, for respondent No.1 Matter was heard for some time. Essentially it is the grievance of the petitioners that persons junior to them were given promotion, contrary to the R & P Rules, as Circle Superintendent and subsequently as Under Secretary. This contention is seriously disputed by the respondents. According to them, private respondents had legitimate claim of promotion over and above the present petitioners. 2. Faced with this situation, Mr. Gupta prayed that petitioners be permitted to make a representation to respondent No.1. Liberty granted. Respondent No.1 shall decide any representation made by the petitioners within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt thereof. Needless to add, respondent No.1 shall take into account the factum of petitioners being placed above the private respondents in the final seniority list pertaining to Head Clerks circulated by respondent No.1. 2. With the aforesaid observations, petition stands disposed of. February 26, 2011 ( Sanjay Karol ), (rana) Judge.