EiiGii CQURT U}? CEEATHSGA? ' »§a EILéSPER Writ Petiiion {(3) N0. 5&9’7 @f 2ii{}’7 0% ?ETETEONERS . Paddm Smgh ”andei «011 of Smi Jinipa} ainbl- Cyauuu} agm» dbULt § }ua1S bywdEui 0f Q 10, GIEcD Bamdise Vimai Nagzu Ralpu: Byemua Su'igh Chandel son of Shrl Brupal Sulgh Lnpnaei aged about 4w yean resldent of O 18 (Jzeen Paiadme Vnha1 wag“; Raiyu; §mt Veena Smgh Wife oi iayenx ra bmbh Chandei apexi abOm 6o yea” ‘esxdem cf L1 Agroha Jagat, Rmb Road m0 1 Ramm 4. Sim Us} Smgn mfL of $1111 Jaawaut $11161, agud about a0 years rasment 01 Q 18 breen Pmadlae Vmhal Nagar p ' Ralpar Uh Asmsh Smgh son oi Snn Nmelldra §mgh Gautam avyd \_ 34 yeara, lemue‘it o L 1 Agioha . aval Ring Road \0 LRaipur. V’E§{SUS (Jamal Bank 03‘ Indm a bankmv conmany dulv mpolyomted 111mm *he lelwant piovmom 0t Bankmv uompamm xAuquisi‘uon ami Iaqsfer 01 vndertakmgs) Ad 198“ hav111g mar-aha amomst othei brauyhex a bramh oime at Roma, though me Bianch Mcmager, K’Gllui‘u B'hm, xmba (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTECLE 226 OF AriL COI\fS'1'i‘1'UTION OF INDIA) (5b ,HGn"iEie Mr. Satish K A§niho€ii J.) n eseuit : Mm Asmuz bhaima, Advocaie for ‘ihe psiitioners. None for the yespcmient - RESFONBENT {TQAL UrwEk {Pawed en 15‘“ day 9i Desemhexg 2§§§} Leamed coum‘el appearing for the petitioners, 011 insmlctian, saeks pamnssion 0f this Comt to wxulmav tins petmon Wun. 1ibei‘ty t0 ‘iake recourse to ouuar "Wuon 10mm that may be ax aliabia to 111m under me provisisns 0f3aw. I: is Owered 2. The petition is accoréingly (iismissed as withdrawn with the above stated libeny. NO order as to costs U) Consequently, pendirxg applications, ii‘any, stands disposeo of. Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sahu