IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.27458-M of 2010 Date of Decision:29.3.2011 Vipin Kumar Jain .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, D.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.324 dated 21.7.2003 registered under Sections 3,4 of the Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 at Police Station City Jind. No one was present on behalf of the petitioner on 7.12.2010. Accordingly, the matter was adjourned for arguments for today i.e. 29.3.2011. Today also no one is present on behalf of the petitioner. Reply has been filed on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2/State. As per para 3 of the preliminary submission, the petitioner had earlier filed similar Crl. M. No.33340-M of 2003. The said petition was disposed of vide order dated 23.5.2008 with liberty to the petitioner that in case report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. is filed against him, his personal appearance shall remain stayed and the trial Court shall conclude the trial of the case within six months after receipt of the certified copy of order of this Court. It is pointed out that the challan has been filed and the charges Crl. M. No.27458-M of 2010 -2- have been framed. It is also submitted that five prosecution witnesses have already been examined. In view of the above, the present petition on the same cause of action is not maintainable and the same is dismissed accordingly. 29.3.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE