^ \ 0^J. 6^gteBench S.B. (Service Matteri IN_THE_HJGH CQUM' QF_CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) . WRITPETITION fS) N0.'2?^ /2009. PETITIONER: Kalaber Kerketta, son ofJoseph Kerketta, aged about 42 years, Asst.Teacher,Primary School, Jokari (Nanhesar), Block Bagicha, District Jashpur, Chhatdsgarh. versus Respondents ,^A^ /^>'y.^" 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal welfare Department Ministry D.K.S.Bhawan.Raipur, C.G. 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Block Education PfBcer, Block Bagicha, District Jashpur, Chhaftisgarh. 4. Joint Director, Accoiints, TreasLff^ and Pension, BUaspur, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTIGLE 2260F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA J—i ^tf. —78 3»I^I^l R-)i* wn sf^v *H\* tTyn A<-.! WKWI SlHKS 3'5T -4i<41<yl'4, 8>Tllwi<o, fqWWy ^...^^.^.^^^. 3T[^?r'sra^T (ytyS?) TCiiwafOTsn^ *l<<i<-l<fl-1 -EITOif 4 ^tS TfW?R ^sifiptsi'^n Shri C.J.K. Rao counsel f| Sbri'Shashank Thakur PL| At'ffie out^set counsei for {{ie petitioner submits that he wants to withdFaw this peStion with liberty jnake a representation to the authority concerned. He also seeks a dir decidingA^-,r^^sentafion of the State counse! submits tha the order passed in aforementioneij if the petitioner makes a representj same shail be decided sSricUy in ac] Accordingly, the petition is | .aforesaid. !f the petitioner make| a period of one of this order, the same is expected| sr the oetitii ;for the respondents/State. sction to the concemed'authorify for sefitioner at an early date as according to him case of the petitioner is squ^reiy covered with the order passed by this Court in the matter of Yash'a(fant Kumar Bharadwaj v. MunEcips Corporation Durg and another re^orted in 2006 (I!) MPJR CG 96. S at this stage he can not make any statement befcre this Court wheth^r case ofthe petitioner is covered witi :^E^ writ petition. However, he submits that ation to the concsrned respondent, the ;ordance wsth law. jismissed as withdrawn wifh liberty as » a representation to the concerned month from the date of receipt of copy to be decided v/ithin a further period of two months from the date of its rec^ipt. it is made c!ear that this Co(irt has not commented on the merits of the case and the authorities boncemed are free to decide the representation of the petitioner stric]tiy in accordance with law. ^ SA!:^^C v^s^ ^