THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1244 of 2004 ORDER The petitioner filed a complaint against respondent Nos.2 to 4 herein and the same was registered as Cr.No.243 of 1997 under Section 304-B IPC. After investigation, the police concerned filed a charge sheet against the accused and the same was taken on file as P.R.C.No.23 of 1998 on the file of the V Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur. After following the procedure contemplated under the law, the learned Magistrate committed the case to the Court of Sessions and the same was numbered as S.C.No.57 of 1999 on the file of the VII Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur. During the course of trial, P.Ws.1 to 11 were examined and Exs.P1 to P12 were marked on behalf of the complainant. No evidence was adduced on behalf of the accused, but Exs.D1 to D3 were marked. The learned Sessions Judge having considered the said oral and documentary evidence came to the conclusion that the prosecution has miserably failed to prove the case against the accused and accordingly, acquitted them of the said charges. 2. The State, which filed the said Sessions Case before the Court below, has not chosen to challenge the order of acquittal of the accused passed by the Court below and hence, the de facto complainant, who was examined as P.W-1, filed this Revision invoking the jurisdiction of the Court under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. 3. It should be remembered that it is a Revision against the order of acquittal of the accused, where the scope of Revision is very much restricted. Even if this Court ultimately holds that respondent Nos.2 to 3 herein are guilty of the offences with which they were charged, this Court can only remand the matter to the Court below for fresh disposal of the matter, but cannot convert the said finding of acquittal into conviction. Further, though the Revision was admitted as early as on 17.09.2004, notices are not served on the unofficial respondents. As this is a Revision against the acquittal of the accused and the notices are not served on respondent Nos.2 to 4, this Court finds no merits in this Revision and accordingly, the revision is dismissed. ____________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J Date:03.02.2011 sj