IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 300 of 2009 Date of Decision: January 09, 2009 Ram Chander and others ...... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.H.N. Khanduja, Advocate for the petitioners. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. Learned counsel has argued that after the adoption of the Haryana Civil Service Rules, 1978, letter Annexure P-4 was written whereby it was stipulated that those language teachers who have the necessary qualifications as those possessed by Masters and are senior enough could be given current duty charge of Head Master/Head Teacher of High Schools as well as of Middle Schools and that consequently the petitioners were given such charge but subsequently after one year letter Annexure P-6 was issued mentioning that the earlier letter was under reconsideration and the same should not be implemented. It is the contention of the learned counsel that after the issuance of subsequent letter the petitioners would be automatically reverted. In my opinion this is not so. What has been mentioned in the subsequent letter CWP No. 300 of 2009 -2- Annexure P-6 is that the earlier letter is under reconsideration and that the said letter should not be implemented in future. In the circumstances it is clarified that till such time as reconsideration process is over the petitioners shall not be reverted on the ground of issuance of letter Annexure P-6. With these observations this writ petition is disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE January 09, 2009 sunita