THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY C.R.P.No.4278 and 4282 of 2008 Date of Order: 25-2-2011 CRP No.4278/2008: Between: K. Ushasri ..Petitioner And K.V. Subba Rao ..Respondent The Court made the following Order: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY C.R.P.No.4278 and 4282 of 2008 Common order: Since the parties in both the revision petitions are one and the same, they are being heard together and disposed of by this common order. For the sake of convenience, the revision petitioner herein will hereinafter refereed to as “the wife” and the respondent herein will hereinafter referred to as “the husband”. The husband filed OP No.259/2006 against the wife before the Honourable Judge, Family Court, Vijayawada, seeking dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty and desertion. After husband himself examining as P.W.1, the wife filed two IAs., namely IA No.573/2008 under Order 18 rule 17 CPC to recall P.W.1 for the purpose of his further cross examination with reference to the material and information published in a newspaper and IA No.574/2008 to reopen the case for further evidence, stating that she came to know that the husband describing himself as a divorced husband got his personal details and family details registered with M/s. Jandhyala Matrimonials, an organization engaged in arranging alliances and also having web-site net work and the said organization published a news column in the local daily Telugu newspaper under the heading “Jandhyala Matrimonials” and to confront the husband with the information and details published in the news paper and also in the printout of the web site of M/s. Jandyala Matrminonials, she has to cross-examine P.W.1. The trial court dismissed both the applications by the impugned orders dt. 9-12-2008 separately. Questioning the same, the present revision petitions have been filed. Even assuming that in the publication/web site, the husband was described as a divorced husband, it is not a relevant fact to decide the issue involved in the divorce OP filed by the husband, unless the wife pleads that husband himself was cruel to her; she has not deserted herself and unable to bear the torture she left the house, and subsequent events after filing OP. The impugned orders passed by the trial court do not suffer from any illegality warranting interference by this court. Both the Civil Revision Petitions are accordingly dismissed. No costs. _________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J. Dt.25-2-2011 kmr