THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Revision Case No.1605 of 2009 Date:25th September, 2009 Between: Pudari Narahari …Petitioner and 1. Pudari Srilatha & Anr. …Respondents *** THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Revision Case No.1605 of 2009 JUDGMENT: This Criminal Revision Case is directed against the judgment dated 17.07.2009 passed in Crl. Appeal No.110 of 2008 on the file of III Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Asifabad, whereby and whereunder the learned Additional Sessions Judge confirmed the order dated 02.09.2008 passed in Crl.M.P.No.982 of 2008 in D.V.C.No.141 of 2008 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mancherial. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the order impugned in the revision. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a junior advocate and the income he gets is hardly sufficient to meet his both ends and there is no surplus income to provide maintenance to the 1st respondent herein. 4. The 1st respondent herein is the wife of the petitioner. She filed DVC No.141 of 2008 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mancherial, seeking certain reliefs. She also moved an application under Section 23(2) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short, ‘the Act’) seeking certain reliefs i.e., interim protection order under Section 18(1) and interim monetary relief of Rs.8,000/- p.m. under Section 20(d) of the Act. The learned Magistrate, on considering the material brought on record, proceeded to grant interim monetary relief under Section 20(d) of the Act directing the petitioner herein to pay an amount of Rs.3,000/- per month to the 1st respondent herein towards her monthly maintenance apart from prohibiting the petitioner herein from committing any act of domestic violence against the 1st respondent herein. The petitioner herein filed Crl. Appeal No.110 of 2008 on the file of III Addl. District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Asifabad, assailing the order dated 02.09.2008 passed in Crl.M.P.No.982 of 2008 in DVC No.141 of 2008. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, on reappraisal of the material brought on record, did not find any valid ground to interfere with the order dated 02.09.2008 passed in Crl.M.P.No.982 of 2008 and thereby proceeded to dismiss the appeal. Hence, this revision. 5. The revision arises out of the interlocutory application filed in DVC case. The relationship between the petitioner and 1st respondent is not in dispute. The learned Magistrate, after considering the material brought on record, proceeded to grant certain reliefs including the monetary relief to the 1st respondent herein. The appellate Court, on reappraisal of the evidence brought on record, dismissed the appeal confirming the order passed by the trial Court. I do not see any valid reason to interfere with the order passed by the trial Court and confirmed by the appellate Court. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed at the admission stage. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:25th September, 2009. Cs