WPSS No. 231/2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala J. Mr. B. P. Nautiyal, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, the learned brief holder for the State. The petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider his case for appointment on the post of Shiksha Mitra. In my opinion, such direction cannot be issued by this court. It has been stated that the petitioner is claiming appointment on the basis of advertisement dated 1st October, 2005. Even though a copy of the advertisement has not been brought on record,the contents thereof were read out by the learned counsel for the petitioner, which clearly indicates that the appointments on contract basis was only for the end of the academic session. Such academic session has expired since long. Therefore, in the absence of a fresh advertisement, no direction can be issued to the petitioner to consider his appointment for the post of Shiksha Mitra or to consider his representation by the authority concerned. The writ petition is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated: 7.4.2010 Nishant