xN THE HIGH CWRT 0? JUDICATUHE A2 BIMS?UR x?“ (C.G;)\f mm PETImoN No. W4 ow.» 2003 / Erma ‘ 14’ Mann nai we mupat aatnani, agea about 47 yeaxs. miaent of Giaha uri No 1. alock Pallari. District; Raipur { Ex Presi ant ,Sxhrn Jayanti Pathar méaih ‘Januna Lal 3/0 Pun-an age& abeut 53 years, by caste wasiyaa Ex. Secretary, swarn"Jayanti Pathar maaan; g” r/a Village Giéhaimri. No.1, Block Pallari, District RaiFu: (CG). > ‘3 "Jsz: “9c;\9?’»"‘<&§§§ Key Qeéw. “if 4,.» r3“{V ‘0 .. v4 \Qgg". iazq" pmmoww AND $‘ «‘ , ¥ n Q Qvf- kg The stata af mhattisgarh,through the Secretary ' Department‘ef Mining ( Mines ana Minerals) Mantralaih‘i n.x.s.mi1ding, naipur (0G). The callector (Mines ana Mineral Manch) Raipur (CG). &1a Panchayat, Raipur. rmrough its ’mief Executive Officer, Raipur. ‘%va‘6g1 Ram mae. aged abeut 33 years, 3/0 Ram Prasaa Mehar. r/o village am mat aimapuu nlock ?allar.i, DistdCt Raipur (cg), magirathi. ageé about 35 years S/o shri mvlal Mézar, r/g Districta%aipur vim e ana Post (CG). Giahapuri mock Pallari. .Jogmdra Parmey, sarpanch. Gram Panchayat giahapuri, P.S. and Tehail Pallari, District Raipur (CG) . .x’ " x/(f RESPGNDWTS f /, I-r Pmmxon mom ARTICLES 226/237 i0? firm: conwmivrmg g? mun 1¢ Particulars cf the petitioners AS stated in the cause title above. w 2. Particulars o£ the respenaents As stated in the cause title above. X R HlGii COURgI‘GF CHHAT'X‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR w WRIT PETI'I‘ION No. 1947 of2003 PE'l‘ITIONER_§ : Manki Bai & Another. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : The Sm ofChhattisgarh & (Mixers. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE§ 226/227 OELFHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Present: None for the petitioners. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. l and 2. Ms. Shashi Bareth, Advocate appealing on behalf of p Shri Rajeev Smi‘v‘amva, Advacate fo'rthe resondem No. 4 to 6. ORDER QORAL) (Passed on 3O day of Navcmbar, 2010) The matter is called for hearing None appears nor is any representan'on made on behalf of the petitioners. The petitionem may net be interested in pursying the matter. In view of the above, the matfer is dismissed for want ef prosecution. / / Sd— ‘ Satish K. Agnihtri 7 Judg p ‘ e