IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24580 of 2011 Umesh Singh, son of Shambhu Singh, R/O Vill- Takanpura, P.S.- Surajpura, Distt- Rohtas. …..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar … Opposite Party. ----------- 2 09.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Surajpura P.S. Case No. 69 of 2010 for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 406 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj (Rohtas), is named accused in this case being husband of daughter of the informant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. after being blessed with a female child now aged about 12 years. Submission is that the daughter resides with the petitioner, he still intends to resume and continue the matrimonial relationship with the daughter of the informant, who is his one and only wife. He further strengthen his intention an offer is being made to pay a sum of Rs. 1000/- (One thousand only) per month to the daughter of the informant by way of interim maintenance, subject to any order on the point by the competent Court. 2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on the event of filing of an application before the court below stating such intentions as stated above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas, in connection with Surajpura P.S. Case No. 69 of 2010, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years of till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation or even on single default in payment, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Bhardwaj (Akhilesh Chandra, J)