HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24850 of 2010 Date: 07.12.2011 Between: M.Bharathi ..... Petitioner AND The Government of A.P., Reptd by The Principal Secretary, Revenue (Excise) Department, Hyderabad And four others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: None appeared Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4: AGP for Prohibition and Excise The Court made the following: ORDER: The petitioner, who is objecting to the proposed renewal of A4 license in favour of respondent No.5, filed this Writ Petition for a Mandamus to direct respondent No.2 to consider her objections said to have been filed on 23.09.2010, before disposing of the application of respondent No.5 for renewal. At the hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise, representing respondent No.1 to 4, stated that according to the oral instructions given by the office of respondent No.3, the application of respondent No.5 for renewal of A-4 license was not accepted, as a result of which, the license in favour of respondent No.5 has not been renewed. The petitioner is not present in the Court to controvert the above submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.No.31790 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 07th December 2011 DR