IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 187 of 2005 Dr. Teeka Ram Joshi …Petitioner. Versus State of Uttaranchal and others …Respondents. Mr. Alok Mehra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J, (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous and the same be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 2. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 21.6.2010 Avneet