IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 5101 of 2005 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 28, 2009 Santokh Singh ...Petitioner Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-II Ludhiana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA Present: Mr. Devinder Goyal, Advocate, for Mr. Pankaj Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Advocate, for the respondents. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. Learned counsel for the parties states that after admission of the petition, assessment has been framed and in pursuance to the assessment refund has also been paid to the petitioner-assessee. Accordingly, the parties are pursuing their departmental remedy provided by the Income-tax Act, 1961. The writ petition as such has been rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (H.S. BHALLA) April 28, 2009 JUDGE Pkapoor 2