IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 5TH MAY 2009 / 15TH VAISAKHA 1931 WP(C).No. 13203 of 2009(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- THE CORPORATE MANAGER, CENTRAL BOARD OF ANGLO INDIAN EDUCATION, PERUMANOOR, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682 018. BY ADV. MR. ABRAHAM VAKKANAL, SENIOR ADVOCATE MR. PAUL ABRAHAM VAKKANAL MR. BIJIMON C.CHERIAN MR. DIJO SEBASTIAN MR. SABU JOSE RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE AEO, VYPEEN, ERNAKULAM. 4. IVY LOUIS, H.M., E.P.S.ELAMKUNNAPUZHA, ERNAKULAM. 5. ROSE MARIE D'SLIVA, L.P.S.A. C.C.P.L.M.H.S., PERUMANOOR, COCHIN-682018. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. ANTONY MUKKATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) No. 13203 of 2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXHIBIT P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE GO (Rt) No. 4317/06/GE EXHIBIT P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. K. Dis. F5 90432/88 ISSUED BY D.P.I. EXHIBIT P3 : TRUE COPY OF APPOINTMENT ORDER GIVEN TO MS. IVY LUIZ EXHIBIT P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. C/1965/08/L DIS EXHIBIT P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. F5/78822/2008/DPI/K/DIS EXHIBIT P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION EXHIBIT P7 : TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL SCORE SHEET OF SELECTION EXHIBIT P8 : TRUE COPY OF THE FORWARDING LETTER /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P. (C) No. 13203 of 2009 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 5th day of May, 2009 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner who is the manager of a corporate institution is that the appointment of the fourth respondent as the H.M. invoking minority rights has not been approved by the second respondent, who rejected the request as per Ext.P8, which has been subjected to challenge by filing a Revision Petition before the first respondent as borne by Ext.P6. 2. After considering the entire facts and circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P6 Revision Petition in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of 2 months. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd