IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15322 of 2011 Manoj Kumar Singh S/O Sri Hare Ram Singh R/O Village- Nawadera, P.S.- Purana Bhojpur, P.S.- Dumara, District- Buxar ---Petitioner Versus 1. The Union Of India Through Addl. Secretary Home Affairs Govt., Of India, New Delhi 2. The Addl. Secretary Home Affairs, Govt. Of India, New Delhi 3. The Director General Of Police, C.R.P.F., C.G.O. Complex, New Delhi 4. Inspector General Of Police, C.R.P.F. Southern Sector, Hyderabad. 5. Deputy Inspector General Of Police, Group Centre, C.R.P.F., Yelahanka, Bangalore,64 ---Respondents. ---------------------------------- 03 08.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Solicitor General for the respondent-Union of India and its official. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner which is taken on record. Petitioner was an applicant for the post of Constable (Tradesmen) in the Central Reserve Police Force (for short ‘CRPF’). It is the case of the petitioner that a nationwide advertisement was published for recruitment of constable by the CRPF. The respondent permitted him to participate in open recruitment rally held at Group Centre, Yelahanka, Karnataka. Petitioner participated therein for his recruitment as Constable (Fitter). He was declared successful in the trade test whereafter he was summoned for being subjected to medical fitness test. He presented himself for such test whereafter he was declared medically unfit/unsuitable for the reasons that he was having hydrocele. Petitioner was at liberty to file appeal thereagainst. It is the case of the petitioner that he got himself medically 2 examinedby the Chief Medical Officer, Sadar Hospital, Buxar who after such examination found him fit for the service/job. Armed with the aforesaid fitness certificate, he filed appeal. It is further the case of the petitioner that he reported for his Review Medical Test before the authority whereafter only his signature was taken on certain paper and it was conveyed to him that he has been held medically fit. However, no appointment letter was issued to him, which propelled him to approach this Court. Learned counsel relying on Annexure-4, which is certificate of fitness issued by the Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Patna Medical College Hospital, Patna and Annexure 4/1 which is the previous medical certificate contended that the authorities could have subjected him to Review Medical Board consisting of doctors of the CRPF as well as doctors of Medical College Hospital duly recognized by the Medical Council of India. It is contended that in several matters this Court has granted the aforesaid relief. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if he is permitted to file a detailed representation in this regard before the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, CRPF, Yelahanka, Bangalore (respondent no.5) who, in turn, be directed to consider and dispose of the said representation in accordance with law. To buttress the aforesaid submission, he has placed reliance on an order dated 04.08.2011, passed by this Court in CWJC No. 12642 of 2011 (Annexure-8). Learned counsel for the respondent, on the other hand, submitted that the medical certificate issued by the Chief Medical Officer, Sadar Hospital, Buxar (Annexure-4/1) does not disclose that 3 petitioner is not suffering from hydrocele. However, considering the stand taken by the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondent submits that this Court may dispose of the matter in the aforesaid terms. Having heard the parties and on perusal of materials on record including the documents placed at Annexures 4, 4/1 and 8, this court is satisfied that the present application be disposed of by the following order:- Let petitioner file a detailed representation in this regard before the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, CRPF, Yelahanka, Bangalore (respondent no.5) within a period of 03 weeks from today along with a copy of the present order whereafter the said respondent shall consider and dispose of his representation in accordance with law by a reasoned order under intimation to this Court within a period of 04 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation in the manner indicated above. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)