IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 24TH JULY 2007 / 2ND SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 16111 of 2007(R) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- ADV.P.K.FAIZAL, S/O.MOIDEEN.P.K., GENERAL SECRETARY, I.U.M.L. COMMITTEE, NEERUTTICKAL, KUZHIMANNA P.O., MALAPPURAM, RESIDING AT BABU MANZIL, NEERUTTICKAL, KUZHIMANNA P.O., MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.ARUN KUMAR RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM. 3. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, ERANADU TALUK OFFICE, MANJERY, MALAPPURAM. 4. VILLAGE OFFICER, KUZHIMANNA VILLAGE, MALAPPURAM. 5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. M.R.SABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C)NO.16111 OF 2007 -------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 24th DAY OF JULY, 2007 JUDGMENT The petitioner claims to be the Secretary of Indian Union Muslim League Committee, Neeruttickal Unit in Malappuram District. The Committee wants to construct a committee office in 2.02 cents of property purchased by the Committee. However, by Ext.P9 order the construction has been stopped on the ground that the petitioner has violated the conditions of the permit issued under the Kerala Land Utilisation Order. The petitioner has filed Ext.P10 before the 1st respondent in this respect. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P10 in the light of Exts.P7 and P8. 2. I have heard the learned Government pleader also. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there would be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P10 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall be afforded an opportunity of being heard also. It would be open to the petitioner to rely on Exts.P7 and P8 or any other document, which according to W.P.(c)No.16111/07 2 the petitioner is favourable to him. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd