IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CWP No.1855 of 1991 (O&M) Dated: 4th August, 2011 Balbir Singh and another … Petitioners Versus The State of Punjab and others … Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present: Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pawar, Addl. AG, Punjab, for respondents No.1 to 3. None for respondent No.5. ***** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? YES/NO 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? YES/NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? YES/NO K. KANNAN, J. (Oral) 1. The impugned order was subject of challenge at the instance of some other persons bunch cases in CWP No.11714 of 1989. The said petitioners incidentally were the fifth and sixth respondents in the above said writ petition. As per the decision in CWP No.11714 of 1989, the present case is remitted to the Director, Panchayat, Punjab for consideration in the light of observations made in CWP No.11714 of 1989 decided on 02.12.2010. 2. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 2.August 04, 2011 ( K. KANNAN ) Rajan JUDGE