IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND SIX : PRESENT : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE: J.CHELAMESWAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE: D.APPA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 11453 of 2006 Between: Borroth Sham Rao, S/o. Borroth Bhavani. ..... Petitioner AND 1. The Station House Officer, Moinabad Police Station, Moinabad Post, R.R.District. 2. Navarkhele Gandi, S/o. N.Seetaram, R/o. Aziz Nagar Village in Gudusuloo Moinabad Mandal, R.R.District. 3. Navarkhela Sitaram, S/o. Late Shivaji, R/o. Aziz Nagar Village in Gudusuloo Moinabad Mandal, R.R.District. 4. Navarkhela Siddhu Bai, W/o. N.Sitaram, R/o. Aziz Nagar Village in Gudusuloo Moinabad Mandal, R.R.District. 5. Navarkhela Mahankali, S/o. N.Sitaram, R/o. Aziz Nagar Village in Gudusuloo Moinabad Mandal, R.R.District. 6. Navarakhela Laxmi Bai, W/o. N.Mahankali, R/o. Aziz Nagar Village in Gudusuloo Moinabad Mandal, R.R.District. Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas corpus directing the Respondent No.1 herein to produce Mrs. Navarkhela Renuka, W/o. Navarkhele Gandi before this Hon’ble Court from wrongful confinement and illegal confinement in the house of Respondents 2 to 6 herein and set her free forthwith. The Petition coming on for admission upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed herein and the order of the High Court dated. 19-06-2006 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Nazir Ahmed Khan, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Advocate General on behalf of the Respondents. The Court made the following ORDER: “ By an order dated. 03-07-2006 we directed the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District to submit a report in the present case on the various aspects indicated in the order. The learned District Judge by a letter dated. 09-08-2006 communicated to the Registrar (Judicial) explained the reasons for which the report could not be placed before the court within the stipulated time. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Advocate General. In the circumstances, we are of the opinion that the time stipulated earlier by this court in the order dated. 03-07-2006 is enlarged and the learned District Judge is directed to submit the report within a period of three weeks from today. ..2.. Post the matter after receipt of the report.” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District. (By Speed Post) 2. The Registrar Judicial, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (for kind perusal) 3. The Station House Officer, Moinabad Police Station, Moinabad Post, R.R.District. 4. Navarkhele Gandi, S/o. N.Seetaram, R/o. Aziz Nagar Village in Gudusuloo Moinabad Mandal, R.R.District. 5. Navarkhela Sitaram, S/o. Late Shivaji, R/o. Aziz Nagar Village in Gudusuloo Moinabad Mandal, R.R.District. 6. Navarkhela Siddhu Bai, W/o. N.Sitaram, R/o. Aziz Nagar Village in Gudusuloo Moinabad Mandal, R.R.District. 7. Navarkhela Mahankali, S/o. N.Sitaram, R/o. Aziz Nagar Village in Gudusuloo Moinabad Mandal, R.R.District. 8. Navarakhela Laxmi Bai, W/o. N.Mahankali, R/o. Aziz Nagar Village in Gudusuloo Moinabad Mandal, R.R.District. 9. The Section Officer, Writ Filing Section, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 10. Two CCs to the Advocate General, High Court of A.P.Hyd(OUT) 11. One CC to Sri Nazir Ahmed Khan, Advocate(OPUC) 12. Two spare copies. SAH HIGH COURT JCJ & DARJ DATED: 11-08-2006 NOTE: POST THE MATTER AFTER RECEIPT OF THE REPORT ORDER WP.NO. 11453 OF 2006 DIRECTION DRAFTED BY: SAH APPROVED BY: DRAFTED ON: 14-08-2006 HIGH COURT JCJ & DARJ DATED: 11-08-2006 NOTE: POST THE MATTER AFTER RECEIPT OF THE REPORT ORDER WP.NO. 11453 OF 2006 DIRECTION