THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2954 of 2008 Date: 14.02.2008 Between: B.K.Raghava Reddy and another … Petitioners AND The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and others … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2954 of 2008 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.1 and 2 in seeking to grant permission in favour of respondent No.3 for making constructions on land bearing Survey Nos.106(P), 79(P), 69(P) and 80/1(P) of Chandanagar Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Rangal Reddy District without considering the objections, dated 14.11.2007 filed by the petitioners as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioners also sought for a consequential direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider their objections before granting any permission in favour of respondent No.3. Heard Sri Sridhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Kodandarama Rao, learned counsel representing the learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 and Sri M.Dhananjay Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2. In the view, I am taking, there is no need to issue notices to respondent Nos.3 to 12 for the disposal of the writ petition. The only grievance of the petitioners as evident from the averments contained in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and as projected by the learned counsel during the hearing is that respondent No.1 is seeking to grant permission to construct a multistoried building by respondent No.3 without considering the representation sent by the petitioners through their lawyer on 14.11.2007. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that if a multistoried building is constructed as per the plan submitted by respondent No.3, the only way to the properties of the petitioners will be blocked. Since the petitioners claim that so far building permission is not granted by respondent No.1, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the objections of the petitioners before granting building permission to respondent No.3. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.3826 of 2008 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 14th FEBRUARY, 2008 Note: issue copy in three (3) days. B/o kvni