18i .y:...^'-1-!:^. i' !,yrete^s^ i ''<B@iaa g HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATJB1LASPUR D.B.: HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR SINHA& HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE RADHE SHYAM SHAS^SA FII^TAPPEAL N0,144/2004 APPJELLANTS 1 2.b. 2c 4 Aeltemesh Rein, AA/ocate, aged about 55 years (I child of Appellant),S/o Late Mohammad Murtaza Rayee,R/o 107, Natraj Apartment, 67-1P Exla, Delhi- 92 Mrs. Noor Jahaz Rayee, aged about 49 yeare, wMaw of late Yaar Muzzamlll Rayye (2nd child of Appellant) Cto Aeltemesh Advocate, R/o 107, Natraj Apartment, 67-1P Exta,Delhi 92. Shakooh Azam Rayeen, aged about 26 years, S/o Late Yaar Muzzamlll Rayeen aged C/o Aletemesh Rein, Advoate, R/o 107, Natraj Apartment, 67-1P Exta,Delhi92 Miss Alfia Rayeen aged about 22 yeare, D/o Late YaarMuzzamill Rayeen, C/o Aeltemesh Rein, Advociate R/o107,Natraj Apartment, 67-1P Exta, Dethi 92 Shahan Iqbal Rayeen, aged about 49 years (3rd child of appeltant) S/o Late Mohammad Murtaza Rayeen, R/o Ghaeala Niwas, Near Shastri Govt. Hospitat, Ward Supela,Bhilal, Distrlct Dwg (C.G.) Mrs. Mussarat, aged about 47 yeare,{4th chitd of appellant)W/o Nlshat Anwar Rayeen.R/o Rayean Cottage^ Shams Lane, Purab Sari Road.Mungliyer, gNlal FIRSTAPPEAL N0.144/2004 '} 8 9 RESPONDENTS 1 Nasir Jamia Rayeen aged aboufr 44 years (5th child of appellant) S/o late Mohammad Murtaza Rayeen, R/o 0/01 Altemesh Raln, Advocate, R/o 107, Natraj Apartment, 67 IP Extn, Delhi-92 Budruddpja Rayeen, aged about -C years (6ttl child of appellant) S/o Late Mohammad Murtaza Rayeen R/o Block No. 4 L, Cross Street-3, Sector-6, Bhitai District, Durg (C.G.) Mrs. tshrat.aged about 42 yeare (7th" child of appellant)W/o IVIr.Qutubuddin, Advocate, R/o 903, Sector-8, Panchkhula (Haryana) Anwar Saeed Ra^en aged about 40 yeare (8th child of Appelant)S/o Late Mohammad Murtaza Rayeen, R/o 404, Sector - 11 ,Panchkulal(Haryana) Mrs. Zeenat, agedabeut 38 years(9th child of AppeBarrf) W/o Kuwar Narender Singh Rathore, R/o 184S C Ruabanda Sector, BhHai, District Durg (C.G.) (All the ^peHants substituted by Court Order dated 26.08.2004 Versus The Hindustan Steel Ltd. (Now Steel Authority of tndta LtA), BhilaiSteet Plant, Bhilai Ispath Bhawan, Bhilai, District Durg (CG) Through its Managir^ Director Tjie Estate Offlcer, BSP BWIal Town Adminl^ratton Bulklir^, Civic Center, Bhilai Townshlp.Bhilai, Distrtet Durg (C.G.) FIRSTJkPPEALNO. 144/20Q4 ^ State of M.P.( Now Chhattisgarh, Through the Collector, Durg (C.G.) Aopearance: Nonefortheappellant. Mr. Gautam Bhaduri, Advocate for respondents 1 & 2. Mr. U.N.S. Deo, Govemment Adyocate for respondent No.3. ORALORDER (25.07.2011) The foNowing order of the Court was passed by Sunil Kumar Sinha. J. This matter is listed today along withW.P.No.3537/2004 and MCC No.137/2004. Lastty, itwas listed on 17.11.2008, on which date, the apRellantappearecl in perwn and prayed fpr and was granted 8 weeks time to flte properiy eonstituted application under Order 44 Rule 1 read with Order 33 Rules 2& 3 C.P.C. S.P.C. for llstjngthe case tpday was issued to the petitioner/appetlant Nq.1 in W.P.No.3537/2004. Even after all this, there is no represeiitation on behalf of the appellants. Since there is no representatlon on behalf of the appellants, even in two rounds, we are teft with no other option except to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. Accordlngly, theappeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- i Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/- R.S. Sharma Judge