I_n the Honble High Court 0_f Chhattishggrh a_t Bilaspur (C. G.) Wy. No ..............1 4'65............... 200g Petitioner ................ Aeman Jain aged 35 years son of Shri / Daulatram Jain, Assistant Teacher, Government Middle School, Golekumadha Post-Charama, District—Kanker (C.G.‘) Versus Respondents ............. 1. The State Government of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.KIS., Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Q. Tribal Development, Kanker (C.G.) $ . oy$§Writ _ kw petition under Articles - 226/227 , g the Constitution o_f India for . the issuance _0_f, writ i_n the nature o_f mandamus certiorari, prohibition and for other suitable writ/writs: order/orders: and direction/directions. ‘ ,t e 3'15 HIGH QQURT OF GHHATTEGARH AT B!LA§PUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’$LE MR. 5ATI$H K. AGNHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITION NO.1463 OF 2006 Petitioner : Aeman Jain Versus The sate Govemment of Chhattisgarh and another Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner; By this patltlon under Articles 2261227 of the Constitution of India, the petitionef seeks a direction to the respondents to pay the [incremenis and seniority on the basis of the date of his initial appointment in the light o'f the decisian rendered by the learned State Administrative Tribunal, Jabaipur in Originai Appiication No.1452 of 1998 (Han'sh Chand Singh and others vs, State of HP. and others) dated 31-1-2000. Oriinal Application No.802 of 1998 (Akhilesh Mishra and others vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others) and Original Application No.99! of 1998 (Ramayan Prasad Dwivedi and others vs. State of M.P. and others). ”55 2. Learned counsel appearing for the pe‘itioner has mad a copy of the order dated 6-4-2005 (Annexure P-3) passed by this court in Writ Petition No.1331 of 2005 (Dharam Raj Mandavi vs. Staie of Chhattisgarh and anathel) and submits that tha petitioner is similariy situated, therefore, he should be given parity. 3. The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as Teacher in the School Education Depaxtment on probation for a period of two years with the fixed salary. However, later on. after completion of two years' probation, the petitioner was regularized. but, he was not given the regular pay-scale. Other similarly situated teachers moved the State Administrative Tribunal, Jabaipur for regular pa’y~scale. wherein teamed Tribunal, vide order dated 31-1-20m, allowed the , same. The petitioner made several representations to accord the same > treatment as he is also similarly situated teacher. but, the respondents have not paid any heed. Thus, this petition. r 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submis that the petitioner may be allowed to make a representation to respondent No.1 «XV yin r to give similar treatment to the petitioner and the same pay~scale which has been sanctioned to other similarly situated teachers on account of the order of the State Administrative Tribunal dated 314—2090. to which learned counsel for the respondents/State has no objection. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case. in die opinion of this Court. the limited prayer made by learned counsel for me petitioner appears to be reasonable. Therefore, the petitioner is allowed to make {17D a representation within a period of two weeks from today to respondent No.1. raising all his grievances and, in tum. respondent No.1 shall decide the said representation in an objective manner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of such representation. after considering ail the points raised by the petitioner and taking into account the order dated 31-1-2000 passed by the learned $tate Administrative Tribunal in Original Application No.1452 ‘of 1998, and if the petitioner stands on the same footings, as the petitioners in the Original Application No.1452 of 1998, then he be also sanctioned the same pay-scale and seniority. 6. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid direction. No order as to costs Sd/— ‘ ‘ Satish K. Agnihotrl g Judge 7‘“”‘ ‘e