”I . I! $INGLE BEEWH @ 003 BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH E AT BILASPUR w.P. No. 4%9 2005 x.‘ Narendra Pal Singh Late Darshan Singh, Aged about— 35 yaars, R/o. Maolipara, Telibandha, Raipur (C.G.)7 Through : Power of Attorney Holder— Amarjeet Singh S/o Shri Dalbirsingh, Aged about— 38 years, R/o. M‘I.G.— 11/234, Hudeo— Bhilai, Tahsil and District— Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ; /‘1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Transport Secretary, D.K.S. Bhawan—Raipur (C.G.). d2 Regional Transport Authority, Raipur (C.G.). x WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA " {)15 snésmthaim amméam 19.9.2005 Shri Ajay Shrivasfava co'un l for the petitioner Shrl Yashwam' Smgh Thaku Govt Adv for me Sra‘re his bus deparwre 11mmg from D the petitioners permit One anot r permit on the some route has been granted to Saddam Travels and timing of said permut is also sane Therefore there is every possibil ty of accident as such the petitioner timing in the Permit No.15/05 along but that application is not being moved an apphcahon for change wi'rh' requisi're fee of Rs.1,000/-‘, considered and decided by respond Counsei for: The pefi'rioner hm N02. submitted that respondent No.2 be directed to decide the application of the petitioner, to which learned counsel for the responden?s ha no objection. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and having regard the case, respondent No.2 is directed tioner in accordance with lam. the petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. 1o 1‘he fads and circumsfmces of to decide the application of the pe With the direction oforesoi if. Sdl- L.C.BHAD00 Judge SP/FS/2005 - 20,000 The case of the. petitioner is that he h$ been granted a regulw, permit on the route Raipur to Durg vide Permit No.15/2005 and departure timing of bus from Durg is 9 17 m The grievanceof the petitioner is that another permit has been gr ted to one Shri Jivanlal Tamrakw and is 9.15 a.m. i.e. two minutes ahead of 'v n 1 ‘- u e