1 INTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2239 OF 2009 Ranjana Jagannath Gholap ...Petitioner V/s. Maharashtra Slum Rehabilitation Authority & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. P.G. Lad i/by Ms. Aparna Muralidharan for the Petitioner Mr. G.D. Utangale i/by M/s. Utangale & Co. for Respondent No. 1 Ms. G.S Joglekar for Respondent No. 2 Mr. P.Y. Shankar for Respondent No. 3 Mr. K.D. Juvekar for Respondent No. 4. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, AG. C.J., AND S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE: MAY 06, 2010 P. C.:- The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to include her name in Annexure II prepared for a Scheme framed by respondents No. 1 and 2. 2 2. Mr. Lad, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, states that the petitioner has now obtained certain documents, including Electricity Bill, etc., which would evidence that she was residing in the structure, and the structure was existing on the cut-off date. The correctness of the statement made by Mr. Lad is not admitted by the contesting respondents. 3. Mr. Lad states that the petitioner would approach respondent No.2 – Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai / Competent Authority - who has prepared Annexure II, and satisfy the authorities with regard to the existence of the structure and the entitlement of the petitioner for benefits under the Scheme. If the petitioner approaches the said authority/officer in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, it/he shall consider her case, and pass appropriate orders within a period of three months from the date the petitioner makes the necessary application to the authority/officer, and pass a speaking order on the application. 4. With this direction to the authority, the petition is disposed of. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.