IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2010 / 19TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 31116 of 2010(L) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- DEEGA AUGUSTINE, D/O.AUGUSTINE, KONUPARAMBAN HOUSE, ANNANAD P.O., CHALAKUDY VIA., THRISSUR-680 309. BY ADV. SRI.JIJO PAUL. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSINI HILLS P.O., KOTTAYAM, PIN-686 560. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENTRANCE EXAMINATION, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING COLLEGE, THRISSUR-680 008. R1 BY SRI. T.A. SHAJI, S.C, R2 & R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/10/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 31116 of 2010 L ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 11th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner has completed BCA Course from a College affiliated to the first respondent University. She did not pass one paper of the 3rd semester examination. She appeared in the re- examination and results are awaited. On the ground that she has completed the course, she applied for admission to MCA. Accordingly, the second respondent allotted the petitioner to the third respondent college. According to the petitioner, she has to produce the results of the re-examination before 13-10-2010. On that ground, this writ petition is filed, seeking a direction to the first respondent to publish her results and also to direct the second and third respondents not to cancel the allotment/admission. 2. In various cases of this nature filed by students like the petitioner, the University has informed this Court that they have already forwarded the answer scripts for valuation and WPC.31116/10 : 2 : that results are expected to be published by 15-12-2010. Therefore, no further directions in that regard is called for. 3. However, petitioner seeks a direction from this Court requiring respondents 2 and 3 not to cancel the allotment or admission, on the ground that the petitioner did not produce the results before the last date prescribed. 4. At present, the petitioner is not a qualified student. Therefore, this Court will not be justified in issuing any direction as sought for. Be that as it may, it is for the petitioner to approach respondents 2 and 3 and obtain appropriate orders to maintain her allotment and admission. Writ petition is disposed of. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks