IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2917 OF 2006 PETITION (L) NO. 2917 OF 2006 PETITION (L) NO. 2917 OF 2006 Sadanand Rewale & Ors. ... Petitioners V/s. SRA & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. S.M. Sakhardande i/b. Sadhana Salvi for the petitioner. Mr. Abhijeet Wagh i/b. Utangale & Co. for respondent No.1. Mr. Pradeep jadhav, AGP for respondent No. 2. Mr. S.M. Sabrad for respondent No. 3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 21st December, 2006 : 21st December, 2006 : 21st December, 2006 P.C. . The petitioners claim that they have purchased the premises from the persons who have been allotted premises under SRA Scheme. They now seek protection. In our opinion, considering the SRA Scheme and the Conditions, the person who has been given or allotted tenement under SRA Scheme, cannot transfer or sell the premises under the provisions of The Slum Rehabilitation Act and Conditions of the scheme. In the light of that, the petitioners have no legal right. Hence, petition disposed of. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]