IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 14531 of 2010 Date of Decision : August 17, 2010. Bhupinder Kaur ...... Petitioner Versus. The State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH. Present:- Mr. Rajnish Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. JASBIR SINGH, J. (ORAL). By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has laid challenge to the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short ‘the Act’) dated 26.09.2007 (Annexure-P-5), proposing to acquire a vast track of land including the land of the petitioner. Further challenge is to declaration issued under Section 6 of the Act on 25.09.2008 (Annexure-P-6). It is an admitted fact that the petitioner, within the stipulated period, after issuance of notice under Section 4 of the Act, failed to file any objection under Section 5-A of the Act. If that is so, in terms of ratio of the judgments of Hon’ble the Supreme Court in the cases of Star Wire (India) Ltd. v. State of Haryana, (1996) 11 SCC 698; Municipal Council Ahmednagar v. Shah Hyder Beig, (2000) 2 SCC 48; C. Padma v. Dy. Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, (1997) 2 SCC 627; and M/s Swaika Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, JT 2008 (2) SC 280, petitioner’s writ petition cannot be entertained. Dismissed. (JASBIR SINGH) JUDGE (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) JUDGE August 17, 2010. sjks.