Sarju Ram Vernsa, S/o Shri Shri Nohar Singh Vernia, aged 56 years, Head Master,. Guivernment Middle School Ziya Block Bemetara District Durg (C.G) The State Govt. of Chhattishgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Rajipur (C.G.j (2) ' District Education OfEcer, Bemetara Durg, Dislrict Durg C.G. 5 ./ 0 picse"- ^^ ttA>,ed--" (-^^^^_ •7 /- 2 9. W.P. (S) No.....?..".'. ^.."......2011 e- \^ y^ ^3 HTOH COURTOF CHHATTISOARH AT BILASPUR aB:HOirBl,ESHRIJUSTICBPRI'nHIUlRMWAKBR PBTITIONBR RB8PONDBNTS W.P.tSI N0. 3628/2011 Sarju Ram Venna ^rsus StateofC.G. & Ofhers WRIT PETn-ION UNDBR ARTICLB 226/227 OF TKB COB8TITUTl(»tW INDIA AoBearance: Shri Soaateaat Verma, couasel for fhe petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, P.L. for ftie Stete. ORALORMSR (08.07.2011) With the conscat offhe partics, ttae matter ia heatd QiiaQy. The petitioner was iiittiaUy appoiated as Assistant Tcacher on a fixed pay of Rs. 100. After completi.an of his probation period, he was granted regular pay scale of Rs. 169-300. Leamed counsel for tfae petitioner aubxnits that the above issue has been considered by fhe M.P. State Adinltustradye Tribwnal, Jabalpur ia O.A. No. 2745/89 between Madhulcant Yadu aiKt 56 others Vs. Stete of M.P. and ofhers, wherein it was held that siaularty situated teachers are eatitled to regular pay scsSe wlth efifect fiont the date ®fiaitial appomtment The mattcr was tafeen up to the Hon'ble Supremc Gourt. The appeal was disnussed by the Honl&te Supreine Court upholding the decision of the Tnbunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistent Teachers are entitted to regular pay scale fioia fhe date of mitial appoiatonent. It is furfher subaiutted fhat this Court while considering the same issue in W.P. (S) So. 4725/2006 between Amar Sai Rcan St Others Vs. Sfate ofChhattisgcah and. Others by ordcr dated 01.09.06 aUowed the petitioiijers to makc a representation wifhin a period ofteu days, laising all ttie gnevances. Acconlit^ty &e pctitioner fa graited Uberty to Bttake a representation raising aU hia grievaaces in the Hght of thc aforesaid judgment aad fhe circular dated 05.01.2011 (Annexure P/5), aad in tura the concemed respoadent is directed to decide the represcntation, if any, in accordem.cK with law, on tts own merite, wifhin a period of e^ht weeks fi?oni fhe date of receipt of fhe represcntation subject to verificatioa ofthe facts. In view of the foregoitig, fhls petition is disposed o£No oider as to costs. -— Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge