IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 1375 of 2010 Between: Kethiri Sudarshan Reddy, S/o. Narsimha Reddy, R/o. H.No. 5-11-186, Naimnagar, Hanamkonda, District Warangal ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, through Pubilc Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad 2 The Sub Inspector of Police , PS Eturnagaram, District Warangal .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased toto quash the Crime No.98/2009 of P.S Eturnagaram Warangal District and on the file of the Hon'ble III Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate at Warangal The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.PURNACHANDRA RAO, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER PSR, J. Crl.P.No. 1375 of 2010 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. The accusation against petitioner (A-3) is that he has sent an amount of Rs.60.00 Lakhs through A-1 and A-2 for being paid to extremists for organizing unlawful activities. When the police, on information went, they found several extremists, who, on noticing the police, disappeared into the forest and A-1 and A-2 were caught with the said amount of Rs.60.00 Lakhs. It is the further case that A-1 and A-2 allegedly confessed that the said money was sent by the present petitioner for being paid to the extremists. The police seized the amount. There appears to be no dispute about the police seizing the money. It is not clear as to whether A-1 and A-2 are admitting about the money being recovered from them. As far as the petitioner (A-3) is concerned, his contention is that he never sent that money through A-1 and A-2. As of now, the material available against the petitioner is obviously only the alleged confession of A-1 and A-2 recorded by the Police. 3. In the circumstances of the case, it is directed that the petitioner shall not be arrested till filing of the charge sheet if any. However, the investigation into the case and consequential proceedings based on the result of the investigation shall go on. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. February 19, 2010. *BVS