1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7788 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.855 OF 2009 The Commissioner, Dhule Municipal Corporation and others .. Applicants Versus Khandu s/o Devla Mistri and others .. Respondents Shri S.P.Shah, Advocate for applicants Shri N.N.Jadhav, AGP for respondent No.3 and 4 Shri A.N.Nagargoje, Advocate for Respondent NO.1 (Original petitioner in Writ Petition) AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8670 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.855 OF 2009 Megha Enterprises, Ankaleshwar, Gujarat .. Applicant Versus Khandu s/o Devla Mistri and others .. Respondents Shri N.T.Tribhuwan, Advocate for applicant Shri N.N.Jadhav, AGP for respondent Nos.5 and 6 Shri A.N.Nagargoje, Advocate for respondent No.1 Shri S.P.Shah, Advocate for respondents 2, 3 and 4 in W.P. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE : 26h August 2009 2 PER COURT 1. Since both these civil applications seek recall of the part of the order dated 15.7.2009, imposing costs of Rs.10,000/- each on the respondents 1 to 4 for their failure to attend the hearing of the case on 15.7.2009, these applications are being decided by this common order. 2. Shri S.P.Shah, learned Counsel who appears on behalf of respondents 2 to 4 states that the costs of Rs.30,000/- has been deposited by the respondents. Shri Tribuwan, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 states that the costs of Rs.10,000/- would be deposited by the respondent No.1 today. 3. We have heard learned Counsel for the respondents 1 to 4 and for the reasons stated in the application, we recall part of the order dated 15.7.2009 imposing costs of Rs.10,000/- each on respondents 1 to 4. Since the costs have been deposited by the respondents, costs be refunded back to the respondents. 4. Civil Applications allowed accordingly. ( A.V.POTDAR, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) vvr/7788-9670.09ca