IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 26327 of 2007 Between: P.Surya Rao, s/o Sri Adaiah, Presently working as Assistant Prohibition & Excise Superintendent. Y.Junction, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 K.Prakash Rao, S/o Late Prakasam, Prohibition & Excise Inspector, Avanigadadda, Krishna District. 2 The Government of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Prohibition and Excise) Department, A.P.Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 4 The Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 5 G.Kutumba Rao, Proh.& Excise Inspector, Bhavanipuram, Bijayawada. 6 Y.Anji Reddy, Excise officer (Industrial) Balanagar, Hyderabad. 7 D.Narsimha Reddy, Proh.& Excise Inspector, O/o Asst.Commissioner, Enforcement, Eluru, West Godavari District. 8 Y.Bheem Reddy, Proh.& excise Inspector, S.H.O., Kanchika Cherla, Krishna District. 9 R.Nagender Rao, Proh., & Excise Inspector, S.T.F.Hyderabad. 10 P.Tyagaraju, Proh., & Excise Inspector, S.H.O., Mylavaram, Krishna District. 11 Y.Srinivas Chowdary, Proh., & Excise Inspector, Tuni, East Godavari District. 12 K.Chitti Babu, Proh., & Excise Inspector, Kovvuru, West Godavari District. (respondents 5 to 12 are not necessary parties to this writ petition.) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, to declare the impugned common orders passed in O.A.No.7264/2005 in O.A.No.5375/2006 dt.24/07/2007 of the Hon'ble A.P.Administrative Tribunal as the one passed without properly examining the facts and law involved in the case to the extent of petitioner herein and set aside the same as such to the extent of petitioner herein. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.RAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Mr. M. Surender Rao Counsel for the respondents 2 to 4: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Smt. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRIAH W.P. No. 26327 of 2007 O R D E R: (Per THE HON’BLE Smt. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI) This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the impugned common orders passed in O.A. Nos. 7264 of 2005 and 5375 of 2006 dated 24.7.2007 on the file of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal as the one passed without properly examining the facts and law involved in the case to the extent of the petitioner and to set aside the same as such to the extent of the petitioner. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by Mr. M. Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1, that this matter is covered by the order dated 12.10.2007 passed by this Court in W.P. Nos. 19236 of 2007 and 20484 of 2007 wherein this Court dismissed the said writ petitions. He has also produced a copy of the said order dated 12.10.2007 passed in W.P. Nos. 19236 of 2007 and 20484 of 2007. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel, this writ petition is dismissed in terms of the order dated 12.10.2007 passed by this Court in W.P. Nos. 19236 of 2007 and 20484 of 2007. T. MEENA KUMARI, J. G. CHANDRAIAH, J. Date: 12-03-2008. MVB.