1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1434 0F 2010 *** Shri Balaji S/o Sitaram Punde Versus The State of Maharashtra and others *** 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner, learned A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 and learned counsel Mr. Ashtekar who appears for rest of the Respondents, except Respondent Nos.11, 16 and 17. 2. The present Petitioner was officiating as Sarpanch of the village Gram Panchayat concerned. Requisition for no confidence was moved by the Respondent/ members of the Gram Panchayat. Tahsildar concerned accordingly scheduled meeting for consideration of the no confidence motion against the present Petitioner. Record shows that notices were issued, meeting accordingly had taken place, minutes were prepared, no confidence motion has been passed by the appropriate majority. Petitioner, thus, has been removed from the position of Sarpanch of the Village Gram Panchayat concerned. This removal was challenged by filing Dispute Application under section 35 before the learned District Collector. The matter was entrusted to Additional District Collector. Learned 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. Additional Collector, after hearing the parties, uphold the order and dismissed the Dispute application filed by the present Petitioner. This order was carried in appeal before the learned Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad. Learned Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, after hearing the parties, dismissed the appeal. Copy of the order is on record. The learned counsel for the Petitioner assailed the order passed by the learned Divisional Commissioner in this writ petition. I have given due consideration to the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties. In my view, there is no case established for interference in extraordinary jurisdiction at the hands of this Court. 3. Writ petition stands dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.] Dated:18/02/2010. ans/1434