ia.,..-rto.f mG\s c^-\-^t^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETmON (S) N0. W^^ OF 2006 PETITIONER .V °t".^ ^^ ^^•^•;... <?$^1' A<s' •'>•-•' R^SPONDENTS : / 1. ^%% Babulal Rajwade, Son of Shri Gulsai, aged about 43 years, Presently working as Upper Division Teacher, Middle School Sakalpur, Block Pratappur, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of School Education D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). /2. The Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 3. The Commissioner, Tribal Development, Raipur (C.G.). , 4. The Collector, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 5. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner most respectfully states as under:- XI-HC-78 <ii»i?irajKrai 3"5T^Trai?PT, WTn'M'Ko, (s|ftl«y ^^^:.L1S?l/^ 3^ V^ 200 sn^rTgq? (^gigg^sr) sn^T^rf^.iR; (rarsn^TCTW g^RRgf?(f37I^T °hl'i|t(-l41-l TORTf ^' ts^S (^RZTC ^73TRtIT311^T 18.8.2006 Smt. Mala Dubey, Advocate f^r the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahiy'a, &y. ffovt. A<jivocate for the Stffte on advance copy. Heard. By the instant petition, the order dated 30.6.2006 (Annexur^ petitioner has challenged his •i'rcnsfer P-1) made under the Rationalization Scheme,2006. The main grievance of the ^etitioner is that without following the provisions of the scheme the petitioi^ Clause-7 of the scheme provi<| as such, the petitioner has equaily, efficacious, aiternative remedy to redress his grieyance, therefore, the petstioi) of Ciause-7 of the scheme in order instance, the petition is not maintain^ibte and same is dismissed. Learned counsel for the peti'f'ioner submitted that the petitioner has already made representotion to re^pondent No.4 regardin9 the oforesaid gnevance. Respondent No.4 moy also petitioner and pass appropriate orde The time taken by the petitM shali be condoned by the appellotri appeal os per c!ause-7 of th®schem4 Consequentiy, M.(W.)P. No.34p0/06 atso stands dismissed. er hos been transferred. es for an appeal^tyian a99rieved taacher, isr, if so odvised, moy avai! the provisions to redress his 9rievance and in the first consider the representation of the •s. ner in filing this patition till its disposa! authority, if the petitioner prsfers an ^ ^'<^ SdA L.C. Bhadbo Judge P.T.O.