vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6431 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.6431 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.6431 OF 2007 Kolhapur Ditrict Central Co-op. Bank Ltd., Kolhapur ... Petitioner V/s. Tanaji Shankar Patil ... Respondent Mr.M.L. Patil for Petitioner Mr.M.S. Topkar for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. DATED: SEPTEMBER 10, 2007 SEPTEMBER 10, 2007 SEPTEMBER 10, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The Labour Court and the Industrial Court in revision have held that the Petitioner bank had committed unfair labour practices under Item 1 (b), (d) and (f) of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act. The petitioner bank had alleged that the respondent had defalcated certain amounts. The Labour Court has found that this defalcation occurred after the respondent workman was transferred to another branch and, therefore, he had nothing to do with the charge levelled against him. In my view, there is no need to interfere with the concurrent findings of fact of both the Courts below. Petition rejected.