- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.279 OF 2007 IN CRI.APPEAL NO. 238 OF 2007 Bhausaheb Narsinha Sathe ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... None for applicant Mr.A.S.Gadkari APP for State ... CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : JULY 20, 2007 DATE : JULY 20, 2007 DATE : JULY 20, 2007 P.C. [PER SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]: P.C. [PER SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]: P.C. [PER SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]: 1. None appears for the applicant. Heard the learned APP for State. 2. Perused the application. In our opinion, sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of delay in filing the Appeal No. 238 of 2007. Hence, delay is condoned. 3. Office to appoint advocate from amicus curiae panel for the appellant. - 2 - 4. Office to inform this order to the appellant through jail authorities. 5. Application is disposed of. [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]