CRM-M No. 22020 of 2011 **** Mamta Kumari vs. State of Punjab Present: Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Gill, DAG, Punjab. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 21 dated 11.02.2011, under Sections 420/34 IPC registered at Police Station Dina Nagar, Tehsil Pathankot, District Gurdaspur. On the last date the following contention was noticed:- “ Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the allegation if any are against the husband of the petitioner who is a house wife and has two minor children. He has further argued that her name has been involved only to create pressure.” Learned DAG, on instructions from SI Satinder Pal Singh, has accepted this factual assertion but has denied the allegation of false implication. In the circumstances I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In case she is arrested, she shall be released on bail by the investigating officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE August 23, 2011 reena