IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 22ND JUNE 2010 / 1ST ASHADHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 618 of 2009(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.2822/2009 Dated 08/04/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- CHANDRAHASAN,S/O.LATE K.VASUDEVAN, AGED 63,KARUVELIPARAMBIL,KALOOR,KOCHI-682017. BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.S.SUJIN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. K.X.JOY KATTITHARA,S/O.LATE XAVIER, AGED 45 YEARS,RESIDING AT POLEKKATTIL HOUSE, NEAR PARUTHELI PALAM,TOLL JUNCTION, EDAPPALLY, PIN-682024. 2. SMT.MINI ANTONY,(AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)SECRETARY,CORPORATION OF COCHIN, COCHIN CORPORATION OFFICE,ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.L.GOPALAKRISHNAN POTTI FOR R1 SRI.A.DINESH RAO FOR R1 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, & P.S. GOPINATHAN, JJ. -------------------------------------------- Cont. of Court Case No. 618 of 2009 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of June, 2010 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. We do not find the action of the first respondent amounting to any contempt of court because first respondent constructed the shed only under orders issued by the Rent Control Court permitting him to construct the building which is on account of petitioner's failure to reconstruct the building pursuant to eviction order obtained in 1987. We therefore dismiss the Contempt Case. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge. (P.S. GOPINATHAN) Judge. kk 2