IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 10625 of 1994 Between: P.Doraswami Reddy, S/o. P.Venkat Reddy, Volunteer/Attender, T.T.D., Tirupathi ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirumala, Tirupathi. 2 Joint Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirumala, Tirupathi. 3 Radhakrishna, Assistant, Ayurvedic College, T.T.D., Tirupathi .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents in not considering the claim for the post of Assistant on par with juniors as illegal, untenable, discriminatory, and further direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Assistant in the existing vacancy on par with juniors with all consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.SRINIVASULU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: MR.G.VENUGOPAL RAO Counsel for respondent No.3: Mr.V.JAGAPATHI The Court made the following: WRIT PETITION NO.10625 of 1994 ORAL ORDER: Mr.P.Srinivasulu, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ------------------------------ 14.06.2005 SSR To 1 The Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirumala, Tirupathi. 2 The Joint Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirumala, Tirupathi. 3 2 CCs to G.P. for Endowments, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad. (OUT) 4 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{PRASAD}