IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.262 of 2010 AWADH BIHARI SINGH SON OF LATE BHUPATI SINGH RESIDENTY OF VILLAGE – NAUKATOLA, P.S. VIJAIPUR, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GOPALGANJ. 3. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE VIJAIPUR, P.S. GOPALGANJ. 4. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGEM KATEYA P.S. GOPALGANJ 5. AMARJIT KUSHWAHA SON OF KRISHNA B HAGAT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MEHITOLA BAIRIYA, O.S. KATEYA, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. 6. RAJENDRA SINGH. 7. RAJMANGAL SINGH BOTH ARE SONS OF LATE KAILASH SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAUKATOLA, P.S. VIJAIPUR, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. 8. BHUPNATH MISHRA SON OF LATE BINDESHWARI MISHRA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – MEHIA, P.S. KATEYA, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. ----------- 03. 14.12.2010 Heard the parties. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievance as highlighted in the writ application, petitioner proposes to bring it to the notice of relevant information by way of representation to the respondent no. 2 for taking appropriate action against the accused persons as the petitioner has information that accused persons is freely moving on account of their non arrest and due to non producing before the concerned criminal court, the case could not be proceeded. In case such representation is filed within a period of six weeks, the respondent no. 2 shall take notice to the relevant information, if any, and proceed accordingly, in accordance with law. The writ application stands disposed of. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)