c^'^ 6 (^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.No.rz>540QF 2003. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS \°.?<:'^? ^t? ^.^^^"" ^^\^y t^>- .^^^- Smt. Kamlesh Kumari Rai, W/o Shri Maniklal Rai, Aged about 43 years, R/o Village Kumhari, Tahsil Marwahi, District Bilaspur, (C.G.). VER S U S 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Mahila Bal Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.). 2. Janpad Panchayat, Marwahi, Through: The Chief Executive Officer, Marwahi, District Bilaspur, (C.G.). 3. Project Officer, Mahila Bal Vikas Vibhag, Marwahi, District Bilaspur, (C.G.). 4. Gram Panchayat, Gullidand, Through: The Secretary, Tahsil Marwahi, District Bilaspur, (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE COJiS^TITUTION OF INDIA sS&S. XI-HC-22 '^"sr ^II^H^ '^^^<o, l^<ni<4^< r 3T?^T^T 1^1TO3TrS¥[ ^RW^t?? ^A^- y \^~ 3ff3p?T "cra^ WH^TWt{ra» U->/f^(<^Q • ^S^^/03 •^ 200 'fN^ar* ^I^T'^rr^R ^T^T D.^.^iXJ^T Petitioner by Shri Rahul qirthaiya, Advocate, State by Shri Praveen Da4 Panel leEwyer. Tbe petitioner has prcfi ^FPlfer3ft;T 'RFT^f ^ fest <[^^l< ^ ^qrf^R 3^^[ rrcd tius writ petition uiider Article 226/227 of the CtonstitatK^a of India chaBengmg the order dt. 3.10.2003 passed by fhe Resjpondent No.2 whereby the appointtnent of the petitioner on fhe post of] without givii^ any opportunily Aaganbadi Worker bas been canceUed |of hearing, Thereforc, fhe action of the Leanied counsel for tihil occasion fhe petitioner was te Ead Hioved to fhe Labour Court tenmnation order and the pe^ again the petitioner has now b^ has fifcd fhis petition ^ainst Respondent No.2 is arbitraiy, d|iscrimiaatory aiid violative ofArticle 14 and 16 offhe Constitution ofln<lia. petitiorier submite tibiat on earUer ited on 7,12.1993 against whfch she the Labour Court had quashai that )iier joiaed tihe services. Thereafter terminated; therefore the petitibDner order (rftennination dt 3.10.2003. The petitfo&er has got eqi| iDy eflBcacious rcmaly avaflable, as on the earMer occ^ion she had 4PP]rosi<:;tled llie Labour Court and got relief, tiiereforc she shoirid ha^e approacfaed fhe Lsdtour Courfc Morc over leanied couxisel for the Stajte submits that tfae order passed by the Respondent No,2 ^ appelabte b^forc the CoUector. In vicw offUe above, this ^etition is diaixdssed on the giound that altemative and equatty eflBcacio^ls remedy fe avaflable to the pstitioner, Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [^^ ~^3^