THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU Tuesday, 21st day of November ,2006 W.P.No.9596 of 1996 Between : L. Samuel Niranjan … Petitioner and The Superintending Engineer, Handri Nava Sujala Sravanthi (HNSS) Circle, Cuddapah and another … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P.No.9596 of 1996 ORAL ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed seeking a Mandamus directing the respondents to continue the petitioner as Job Typist and treat him on par with his juniors in the same category and consider his case for absorption in any suitable post. It is the case of the petitioner that as and when there was job work of Typist in the Office of the Executive Engineer, Irrigation Department, Cuddapah Division, it was entrusted to him on daily wage basis since 1986. Pursuant to creation of new circle i.e. Handri Nava Sujala Sravanthi (HNSS), Cuddapah, he made an application on 25- 11-1991 for appointment as Typist in that circle. In pursuance of the same, the Superintending Engineer, HNSS Circle, Cuddapah allowed him to work as job typist on a consolidated pay of Rs.650/- per month and allotted to the Office of Executive Engineer, C.B.R.Division, Pulivendula (2nd respondent), through Proceedings dated 20-12- 1991. He reported at the Office of the 2nd respondent and continuously worked from 20-12-1991 to 31-10-1992, and thereafter continued by giving some artificial breaks of two days for every three months till 31- 7-1993. When regular vacancies arose in the same circle, he made a representation on 19-4-1993 to the District Collector to regularize his services against the said vacancy. The said representation was forwarded to the 1st respondent-Superintending Engineer for sympathetic consideration. In turn, the 1st respondent addressed a letter to the District Collector marking a copy to him stating that the posts of Junior Assistants and Typists will come under the purview of A.P. Public Service Commission and it is not possible to consider his case for absorption on regular basis. According to the petitioner, the 1st respondent has admitted the existence of vacancies of Typists. He worked for 6 years with some artificial breaks in the Irrigation Department; therefore, he is entitled for regularization as per G.O.Ms.No.193, dated 14-3-1990. Respondent No.1 filed a detailed counter affidavit denying the allegations made by the petitioner. However, it is asserted that the petitioner made a representation to the District Collector, Cuddapah for regularization of his services against the existing vacancies of Typists. Respondent No.1 reported to the District Collector on 22-7-1993 stating that the posts of Junior Assistants and Typists will come under the purview of APPSC and it is not possible to consider the case of the petitioner for absorption against the regular vacancies. The petitioner is no longer in service since 1-5-1993 and he is not working now in the Office of the 2nd respondent. The petitioner has no right whatsoever for claiming absorption in regular vacancies. Further, the petitioner approached the A.P. Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.6920 of 1993, wherein the 1st respondent herein was directed to verify whether the petitioner is working as on the date of the Order and whether he satisfied the requirements laid down in Act 2 of 1994 and G.O.Ms.No.212, Finance Department, dated 22-4-1994 and other Governmental Orders issued from time to time and if he is otherwise eligible and suitable for regularization, appropriate orders be passed as per the directions of the Supreme Court. In view of the above directions, the case of the petitioner was considered and he was informed by letter dated 30-6-1995 that he has not satisfied the requirements laid down in the Judgment of the Supreme Court, but directed to approach the 2nd respondent to attend for Job Typist work, if there is need for the same, on contract basis. It appears that in spite of such a direction from the 1st respondent, the petitioner did not attend the Office of the 2nd respondent for attending the job typist work, on contract basis. In the facts and circumstances of the case, firstly, I am of the view that the petitioner has no right whatsoever for claiming absorption in the regular vacancies. Secondly, the respondents have already considered the case of the petitioner in view of the Judgment in O.A.No.6920 of 1993 on the file of A.P. Administrative Tribunal. Further, the petitioner was directed to report before the Office of the 2nd respondent for the job typist work, but he did not report. It seems, the petitioner is not interested in continuing the job typist work. The Writ Petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. 22-11-2006 prk