CRM-M No. 25600 of 2011 **** Jarnail Singh v. State of Haryana Present: Mr. K.K.Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Man Mohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 78 dated 26.04.2011, under Sections 285, 323, 379, 452, 506, 148 and 149 IPC registered at Police Station Sadar Tohana, District Fatehabad. On 25.08.2011 the following contention was noticed:- “ Learned counsel has argued that the dispute has arisen because the petitioner is a licenced wine contractor while the complainant is in the business of selling illicit liquor. Further that the petitioner was himself injured and was admitted in hospital.” Learned DAG, on instructions from ASI Charanjeet Singh, has accepted these factual assertions though he has stated that the injuries suffered by the petitioner were minor in nature. Be that as it may, at this stage I am inclined to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner appear before the investigating officer on 14.09.2011 between 10.00 a.m. and 4.00 p.m.and on any other date on which his presence is required by the investigating officer. The investigating officer shall, on his appearance, release him on bail to his satisfaction, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE September 06, 2011 sunita