1 CAW844.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.844 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7622 OF 2010 Samata Shaikshanik Samajik Bahuuddeshiya ) Sanstha )..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. )..Respondents ---- Mr.Sandeep Koregave for the applicant. Mr.C.R.Sonawane AGP for respondent nos.1 & 2. ---- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ DATE : 2/5/2011. PC 1 Although the explanation offered for condoning delay is vague and unacceptable, in the interest of justice, the application is allowed as the grievance of the applicant is a mistake of his former Advocate on record. Application is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clauses-(a) and (b) on a condition that the applicant shall pay cost quantified as Rs.1000/- to the High Court 2 CAW844.11.sxw Legal Aid Services. Payment of cost within one week is a condition precedent. Subject to above, writ petition be restored to its original number. Restored writ petition to be proceeded on 4.7.2011. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)