IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2372 of 2011 Date of decision: 21.04.2011 Yadvinder Sharma …. Petitioner Versus The State of H.P. and others …. Respondents Coram : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Abhyendra Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankus Dass Sood, Addl. Advocate General and Mr. J.K.Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.(Oral): The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:- (i) That the respondents may be ordered to regularize the services of the petitioner from the due date in accordance with the policy in this behalf alonwith other consequential benefits.” 2. It is for the petitioner to represent his grievance before the second respondent, in which case, the said authority will get an opportunity to look into the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of as follows: In the event of the petitioner filing appropriate representation before the second respondent, the matter shall be duly 2 considered by the said respondent and appropriate action in the matter in accordance with law will be taken within four months. 3. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice ( V.K. Ahuja ), April 21, 2011 Judge (bss/Tilak) 3