IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4670 of 2005 PRABHAKAR SHARMA Versus THE STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS For the petitioner : M/S Arun Kumar, Pramod Kumar, Advocates. For the Bank : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate. ----------- 5. 13.5.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for State Bank of India(hereinafter referred to” as Bank). 2. Petitioner asserts that he has served as a daily wage worker in the Sekhpura Branch of the Bank for the period between 13.2.1985 till 22.7.2004 and his case for regularization against Class-IV post was recommended by the Branch Manager concerned in the light of instruction issued by the Assistant General Manager Vide letter No. Gen/833 dated 6.9.1999, Annexure-2 and another instruction bearing No. 186 dated 22.5.2002, Annexure-4 and recommendations are dated 14.9.1999, Annexure-3 and 7.6.2002, Annexure-5. Petitioner in this connection has also represented before the authorities of the Bank and the representations are contained in Annexure-6 series which is dated 27.11.2004 and 10.7.1997. 3. From the counter affidavit of the Bank it does not appear that the recommendations 2 have been dealt with by the Assistant General Manager or his superior officer, in the circumstances this writ application is disposed of with direction to the Assistant General Manager, Bank Zonal Officer, Bhagalpur as also Deputy General Manager of the Bank at Bhagalpur to consider the recommendations of the Branch Manager as also representations of the petitioner submitted in regard to the regularization and pass appropriate order in the light of the policy of the Bank for regularization if any in accordance with law as early as possible, in any case, within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)