THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1769 OF 2010 DATED:29.07.2011 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is directed against the order, dated 22.06.2010, in Crl.M.P.No.179 of 2002 in M.C.No.73 of 2008 on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court, Vijayawada, wherein the said application filed by the respondents 2 and 3 under Section 125 Cr.P.C., seeking interim maintenance, was allowed awarding Rs.2000/- per month to each of the respondents 2 and 3. 2. Heard both sides. Perused the records. 3. 2nd respondent is the wife and the 3rd respondent is the daughter of the petitioner. Respondents 2 and 3 filed M.C.No.73 of 2008 against the petitioner for maintenance on the ground that the petitioner deserted them having got addicted to vices and is not providing any maintenance. According to the respondents, petitioner is doing real estate and money lending business earning Rs.25,000/- per month. Petitioner herein filed a counter contesting the Maintenance Case. The Maintenance Case is pending. The contentions of the parties, regarding the relevant assets and liabilities of the parties, will be considered by the learned Judge, Family Court during the enquiry in the Maintenance Case. 4. The trial Court granted interim maintenance of Rs.2000/- per month to the wife and the child. Petitioner contends that he is working as a clerk in a private company for a salary of Rs.5000/-, but he has not filed any salary certificate. Even according to the petitioner, he is owning a house at Vijayawada. Under those circumstances, having regard to the source of income of the petitioner and considering the fact that the respondents 2 and 3 have not been provided with any interim maintenance by him and taking into consideration the basic needs and requirements for a decent living, it is held that the ends of justice would be met by awarding interim maintenance of Rs.2000/- per month to the 2nd respondent-wife and Rs.1000/- per month to the 3rd respondent payable by the 10th of every succeeding month henceforth towards interim maintenance till the disposal of the Maintenance Case. 5. Having regard to the fact that the Maintenance Case is filed in the year, 2008, the learned Judge, Family Court, is directed to dispose of the same at an early date. 6. Criminal Revision Case is disposed of accordingly. _______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 29th July, 2011. Tsy