IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 8542 of 2005 Between: Vatram Sambasiva Rao S/o.V.Raghavaiah R/o.D.No.24-323, Lotukunta, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Superintendent of Police, Guntur. 2 Station House Officer Arundalpet Police Station Guntur. 3 V.Venkateswar Rao, S/o.Raghavaiah R/o.H.No.25-1/1-4, Opp.Rajiva Partk, Ahoknagar, Eluru West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ or direction preferably writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent police in interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and 3rd respondent by issuing notice under seciton 160 Cr.P>C., as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent No.2 and his subordinates not to interfere in the civil disputes in any manner, and pass such other or further orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.KOWTURU VINAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.8542 of 2005 ORDER: This writ petition has been filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent by issuing notice under Section 160 Cr.P.C., as illegal and arbitrary. A counter has been filed stating that basing on the complaint filed by the 3rd respondent on 26-03-2005 making certain allegations against the petitioner, so as to verify the contents of the complaint only, the notice was issued. But, however, the petitioner was not at all called to the police station and the respondents never interfered with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent. In view of denial of all the allegations made in the writ affidavit, I am of the opinion that no orders are required to be passed in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 30-04-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MPL}