CRP 308/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Dhar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. GN Sahewalla, l earned senior counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 3 to 7 as well as Mr. Se n Deka, learned State counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Dhar, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that since t here are lots of mistakes in the application filed under Section 10 of CPC seeki ng stay of further proceeding in Title Suit No. 16/2000 pending in the court of the Civil Judge, Hailakandi, he may be allowed to file a fresh application and a s such the revision petition be disposed of with the direction to the learned co urt below to decide the said application afresh in the event of filing the same. Mr. Sahewalla, learned senior counsel has submitted that the respondents have no objection in that regard. In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the respectiv e pleas raised in the present revision petition, the same is disposed of with li berty to the petitioners to file a fresh application under Section 10 of the CPC and in the event of filing the same, the learned Civil Judge shall consider the same and pass necessary orders in accordance with law.