1 wp1478.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1478 OF 2011 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. Prashant Nagargoje holding for Mr. P.R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for petitioner. Mrs. A.N. Ansari, Advocate for respondent. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 7TH APRIL, 2011 Heard Advocates Mr. Nagargoje holding for Mr. Katneshwarkar for petitioner-original plaintiff and Mrs. Ansari for respondent-defendant. Appellate Court has during pendency of appeal preferred by the respondent stayed the judgment and decree passed by trial Court. Appellate Court has not found that the present petitioner is not in possession of the suit property. The contention of petitioner that his possession is being threatened by present respondent is therefore misconceived. I do not find any jurisdictional error or perversity. However, in the interest of justice, the proceedings in Regular Civil Suit No. 36 of 2009 are expedited. Present respondent shall file a private paper book within two months from today and trial Court shall attempt to decide the Suit itself on merits within eight months thereafter. 2 wp1478.11 2. With these directions, the present Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE gas/wp1478.11