IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18410 of 2009 SMT.JAYMURTI DEVI WIFE OF LATE JAY NANDAN YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KAMATA, P.S. PARASI, DISTRICT ARWAL. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COLLECTOR, GAYA, DISTRICT GAYA. 3. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, IMAMGANJ BLOCK DISTRICT GAYA. 4. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. 5. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER DISTRICT GAYA. ----------- 02. 24.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of arrears of family pension with effect from 18.06.2004, minus the amount already paid. Learned counsel for the State submits that on perusal of the letter no. 79 dated 23.01.2008 as contained in Annexure- 6, it would appear that the petitioner was required to submit the authorization for payment of the family pension and other related papers indicated in the said letter before the Block Development Officer, Imamganj from where the husband of the petitioner had retired from the post of Jan sewak. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of 2 her claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 3 enclosing the copy of the relevant documents if any, in support of such claim along with certified copy of the present order within a period of eight weeks from today. In case such representation is filed, the respondent no. 3 shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the pending claims of the petitioner could be settled with statutory interest without delay. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)