© HISH^QURB^EiSMI-UiTI'ISeaRia^'PBlLASPyR ^Wi-itlPdafioiaNffiSe&ofSOO'l <»RAM^T:;':::Mc|f'bJiS^|S:.R3Na^tea^-^^^ ::'" 1;;: •; & 1-ton'ble Stiri Oillp Raosaheb Deshmukti, J. PETITIONER 11 RESPONDENTS Ku. Sushma Pandey, daughter of Shri Kanhai^a t-at f'andey,. novi/ Smt. ^jSushma Ghoubeywif <5fShnSanihft;h8tibfey,aged abwrt^yeats.reactentofSarkan^ andDistrietSifasByr, Chhattisgarh; VerSus 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the trinGipal Secreteuy, Department ofEducaS&n^ ^aipur. 2. State^MadKya Pradesb ttirougttP'rincipal, SieereteiFSf, Ij^su'tment of EckieaBon.^yalfabh Bhawari, BllgRat, M.P. 3, ©onimissionef.Publiclnstructtens Madhya; F'TS^I^^ N^ar, BhopaI^M.P. | 4. Eiriictor, Pi.ibliic^nstt'uctijons, ? Maidhya l^ctesh, Satpura, ©hetak^^® MsF'.Nagar^BBopal.M.P. ; 5 M.p.St^ Sdro Jabalpur,MiF>; 6^ D^My ;i Dwe^r EducaCon.^^^^ ^ Ofihattisgarh. ShriVinayHarif.jtearrredDy.AdvQGaiteKSeneFallfoFtheState. ORA1.0REER ;ff>asseyon3ltstA(l®ust,2008) The fbllowing orat order of the^ourt was passed by •S.R.NAYAK, G.J. When th^ case was called oiit for motfon hearing aofse appe^l nor any representatioR wasmaclelorrbehalfsfpetitioner. 2. Ift the circumstance, the^writ petition No; 860/2001 isaismilssedtWr non-prosecution; - Sd/- Chief Jiistice Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge