IN THE H3N%ia.iB HISH, CBURT OP ®aHATTXS<3ARH Aa'. B33jASPlTR W*p< N0. 3^_^Z.y200S PETITIONER ' "g;^ .^x/^^ ^^'^.., / • t-~ D-tnesb &uinar Rafeade son of Jagdh.i.sh- ••'r~\ ' - ~ ~ . ,-'\vy ^. Ram Ratade, aged_a3sout 23 years, ^ .•'/Q^^f' Resident ti£ villagsBar'&aiada, ^f7/ .* •• •: • ' • '•• '• ',:• Bistrlct Raipur CG*G«)|*- ^.^^- VERSHS .^s 'eiSENTS ^^5' /* ^!^ ^>J/^^t' ^y\ /si^ ..^iy^ o- /.> ^' ^^v ^ ^' <y :- /^D' The Sfeate o£•ehJaat.'fe.SLsgaEh fiarough - Tbe Seeretary. Degartment c£ Sehool Edueat ion Bepartment, O^K.S* Bhavan, Raipur (C.S.)t 2) The DAreator, 1»®KShikshan Sanahanayaa.ay, Raipur (e*G.).s s~3) The Bistrict Eduosfcien Offleer, Raipur (c.G.)'g WSX'E .PETITION. BNDERMTiatE 226 OP THE.,G®SSTITUTI0N©B'INDIA SOR ISSOANGE OE- WKETCS), OBE)ER(S) ANBIBIKEOTION(S) TO B© ' JVSTICEINTHEaaT'EER. . •' HIQH COURT OF GHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ PetitionNo. 4647 of2QQ5 Petitioner; Dinesh Kumai-Ratade Versus Respondents: The State of Chhattisgarh and othcrs -^ SIa^e Beach: Hon'ble Mr, Justiee Satfah K. Agnlhotri. \ • • • • . . .' • ' Shri M. K. Bbadun, Advocate for thc pctitioacr. Sint. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the Respondents. OEDER (K& November, 2006) The followiug order ofthe Court is passed by Satlsh K. A@>ihotei, J. 1. The father of fhe petitioner naiaely Shri Jagdish Ram Ratade, whfle worfcing as Head Master in Chataudh Primaiy School, Raipur, died in hamess oa 4.10.2000. The petitioner, beiag son i.e. dependent and legal heir, made an application for compassionate appointment on 27.11.2001 (Annexure P/2}. Accordtng to the petitibner, liis case for compassionate appouitaient was not cousidered ou account ofthe fact ttiat the death of his father occurred before creation of the new State of Chhattisgarh. 2. Receiitfy the State Goveinnient has issued citsidar dated 2.2.2006 to eoasider fhe eases of dependeat- legal hei^ of deceasedeinployeeson-coiapassioBatebasis-w;hfiFeAedceeased employee died durmg theperiodfrom 1.11.1997 to 31.10.2000. This Court has also passed orier dated 20.12.2005 in W. P. No. 1322/2002 and otherconnected niatters, in regard to fhe inatters relatuig to coiapassionate appointinents. 3. In view of the above, the State Govenunent is directed to consider the case of the petitioner as per its own GinE'ular dated 2.2.2006 and also ia view of the orderdafed 20.13.2006, passed by this Gourt in W. P. Wo. 1332/3002 aad ©thea'-^-o.aaeeted inattera oa its ow@ merit, in ace<wdaace'<wiffi tew." 4. Pe>r the reasons stated-above, llie writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Thakur Sd/- SatishK.Agnaatri judge