HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12178 of 2008 Date: 19.09.2011 Between: A.J.Hussain ..... Petitioner AND: The Hyderabad Urban Development Authority (Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Buildings), Secunderabad, Reptd by its Vice Chairman And two others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri N.Vijay Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sri M.Surender Rao Counsel for respondent No.2: AGP for Municipal Administration Counsel for respondent No.3: AGP for Revenue The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the letter No.11511/MP2/H/2006, dated 25.01.2008, insofar as requirement of NOC from respondent No.3-Revenue Divisional Officer for conversion of Agricultural land to Non-agricultural purpose as per the Andhra Pradesh Agricultural Land (Conversion for Non-Agricultural purposes) Rules, 2006, notified vide G.O.Ms.No.1537, MA, dated 19.10.2006, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents to release the final layout of the petitioner’s land forthwith.” At the hearing, Sri N.Vijay, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that after the filing of the present Writ Petition, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranga Reddy District, issued an order which was questioned in Writ Petition No.4245 of 2010 and which is pending. Learned counsel further submitted that in view of this later event, the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. He, therefore, sought for disposal of the Writ Petition as infructuous with liberty to his client to pursue the later writ petition. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner in terms of the prayer made. ______________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 19th September 2011 DR