IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 11976 of 2009 Decided on: 29.12.2010 Krishan Kumar and others. …Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioners : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. None for respondents No. 3 and 4. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The petitioners were engaged in Kandi Project, which was founded by World Bank. This project has come to an end on 31.3.2005. Since, the Project has come to an end, the petitioners can not seek continuation/absorption. 2. This question is no more res-integra in view of the judgment rendered by their Lordships of Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Himachal Pradesh versus Ashwani Kumar and others, AIR,1997 SC 352. Accordingly, no directions can be issued to the respondent/State either to continue or absorb the petitioners. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 29, 2010 K. attri 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No