IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3132 of 2009 1. Chandradev Singh S/O Late Ramsagar Singh Vill.- Kujlahi Gram Panchayat & P.O.- Parsa, P.S. & Block- Manjhaulia, Distt.- West Champaran At Betiah 2. Tarun Kumar Singh S/O Sri Basist Narayant Singh Vill And Gram Panchayat P.S. Sunuria, P.S. And Block- Manjhaulia, Distt.- West Champaran At Betiah Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Dr. Deepak Prasad The Principal Secretary, The Department Of Panchayati Raj, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 3. Sri Baidyanath Prasad The Director The Directorate Of Panchayati Raj, Govt. Of Bihar Patna 4. S.M.Raju The Commissioner Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur 5. Dilip Kumar The District Magistrate, West Champaran, Betiah 6. Ghanshyam Prasad Deputy Development Commissioner, West Champaran, Betiah 7. Vijay Kumar Prabhat Null The District Panchayat Officer, West Champaran, Betiah 8. Amrendra Narayan Singh The Chairman/Secretary, Bihar State Selection Commissioner, P.O. Vetenery College, Patna ----------- 02. 05.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The issue in this case was with respect to the appointment of the petitioners on the post of Panchayat Sachiv from the category of Dalpatis. Petitioners approach this court through this contempt application against the order passed in C.W.J.C. No. 1750 of 2001 disposed of on 7th of August 2006. The aforesaid writ application was disposed of with the above observations and directions that in the event, in future posts of Panchayat Sevaks are created and it is decided that such Sevaks shall be appointed from Dalpatis, the case of the petitioners as well as their selection be taken into account. A show cause and supplementary show cause has been filed on behalf of the State stating therein that the case of the petitioners was taken into consideration and upon consideration the same was rejected. Since the order of this court has been complied with this contempt application need not proceed further. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the decision has been taken against the petitioners is not in accordance with law and as such, petitioners propose to assail the same in accordance with law. In this view of the matter, this contempt application stands disposed of. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)