wp1137.11 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1137 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 102 OF 2002 (DECIDED) Haridas Yaduba Jadhav ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ..... Mrs. A. V. Gondhalekar, APP for respondent ..... CORAM : S. B. DESHMUKH AND A.M. THIPSAY, JJ. DATED : 20TH DECEMBER, 2011 P. C. :- 1 The Registry of this Court has received a letter from the petitioner/prisoner dated 28.11.2011, which is registered as criminal writ petition. From the said letter/petition, it appears that he has sought extension in parole leave. 2 Since the communication is received by the Registry of this court, it appears that there is no order passed by the respondents. The learned APP received a copy of this communication. She makes a wp1137.11 -2- statement, on instructions, that the respondents shall decide the application of the petitioner/prisoner in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from today. The statement is accepted and taken on record. In view of this statement, as of today, nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition. However, in case of any adverse order passed by the respondents against the petitioner, the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the said order by filing appropriate proceeding. 3 The writ petition stands disposed of in the light of the statement made by the learned APP. ( A. M. THIPSAY, J.) (S. B. DESHMUKH, J.) rlj/