1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO: 1863/2003 IN FIRST APPEAL NO: 46/2003 (Vallabhdas s/o Mansukhdas Mundhada v Dead Through Lrs vs. Pritamsingh Hardarsingh and another) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders. .................................................................................................................................................................. Mr. Kalbande, Adv.for applicant CORAM: SMT. Vasanti A. Naik , J. DATED: 30th AUGUST, 2007. *** Shri Kalbande, learned Advocate for applicant submits that inspite of payment of Bhatta on number of occasions, Respondent No.1 could not be served. He then submits that the address of respondent no.1 was obtained from the concerned Police Station. It is further submitted on behalf of applicant that summons cannot be served on respondent no.1 by ordinary mode of service as respondent no.1 appears to have been purposely avoiding service of notice. The counsel for applicant then submits that applicant 2 is desirous of publishing notice in the daily newspaper “Jaihind” which is widely circulated in Rajkot (Gujarat) where respondent no.1 was known to have lastly resided For the reasons stated in the Civil Application and the submission made on behalf of the applicant, it is necessary to permit the applicant to serve respondent no.1 by substituted service, by publishing a notice in the daily newspaper “Jaihind” which is widely circulated in Rajkot (Gujarat). Necessary steps to serve respondent no.1 by substituted service should be taken within a period of three weeks from today. Civil Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of. JUDGE sahare