1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3843 of 2010. Date of decision: 14.7.2010 Uma Dutt ….. Petitioner. Vs. State of H.P. and others …. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. L.N. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K.Sharma, Sr. Additional Advocate General, for the respondents. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner in this case is aggrieved since according to him the training period he had spent for JBT is not counted for the service benefits. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will represent his grievances before the Government and at this stage; this Court need not go into the merits of the cases. Therefore, without expressing any opinion as to the merits of the cases, this writ petition is disposed of as follows: There will be a direction to the first respondent to look into the grievances of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law treating the writ petition as representation. The needful shall be done within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition in each case. In case the petitioners seek for an opportunity of hearing, the same shall also be granted. 2 The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice July 14, 2010 (Justice Kuldip Singh), Judge. (sks/grs)