IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.474 of 2010 (M/S) Balram Yadav ….Petitioner Versus Bhagat Singh & others … Respondents Mr. Lalit Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Arvind Vashistha, learned counsel for the respondents. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the order dated 26.03.2010 passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun in O.S. No.120 of 2010. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner is the resident of village Arkediya Grant (Baniyawala), Post Office Prem Nagar, District Dehradun. On 08.02.2010 respondent no.10- Madan Lal Sharma executed an agreement to sale in favour of petitioner in respect of land Khatauni no.151, Khasra no.400, 401 and 402 with measurement of 0.2544 hectare. On 19.03.2010 respondent nos.1 to 6 executed a new power of attorney in favour of respondent no.9-Vikas Goyal. When sale deed was not executed in favour of the petitioner, a notice was given to the respondents on 23.03.2010. By the said notice the petitioner requested the respondents 1 to 6 to remain present in office of Sub Registrar on 25.03.2010 for executing the sale deed but neither respondents 1 to 6 nor their power of attorney holder came forward on the said date for executing sale deed in favour of the petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner came to know that power of attorney executed in favour of respondent no.10-Madan Lal Sharma was cancelled by respondents 1 to 6 and another power of attorney was executed in favour of respondent no.9-Vikas Goyal. Feeling aggrieved on 26.03.2010 the petitioner preferred Original Suit No.120 of 2010 in the court of learned Civil Judge, (Senior Division), Dehradun alongwith an application no.6-C2 in which an interim injunction was prayed for restraining the respondents and their agents from raising any construction over the land in question or from creating any third party interest. In the said suit summons were issued for filing written statement. However, learned Civil Judge posted the application no.6-C2 for disposal on 08.04.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner confined his prayer that the respondents may not create any third party interest as there is registered agreement to sale in favour of the petitioner and petitioner has paid Rs.1,50,000/-to the respondents. He further submitted that application no.6-C2 pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun may be decided expeditiously. Learned counsel for the respondent does not have any objection if direction is issued for expeditious disposal of 6- C2 application. In view of aforesaid discussion, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to Civil Judge (Sr. Div), Dehradun to decide the application no.6-C2 of the petitioner in O.S. No.120 of 2010 within a period of three weeks from the date of production of certified copy of the order. (Interim relief application no.2211 of 2010 also stands disposed of.) (V.K.Bist. J,) 16.04.2010 Arti