1 caw1937 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1937 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5060 OF 2011 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.Raghavan Sarthy i/b Thodur Law Associates for the Applicant Ms Leena Patil, A.G.P for respondent nos.1,3 & 5 CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 14,2011 P.C.: . Not on board. Taken on board. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. The applicant is the respondent no.4 in the disposed of writ petition. As the grievance of the applicant is that bye-laws are not being followed, it is for the applicant to file appropriate proceedings in that behalf and no relief can be granted in a disposed of petition. Application is accordingly rejected by keeping the remedy of the applicant open. JUDGE