IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- RSA no. 2688 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.08.2008 U.H.B.V.N.L and others .......Appellants Versus Smt. Savitri Nagpal .......Respondents Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Present: Mr. K S Malik,Advocate for the appellants -.- NIRMALJIT KAUR , J. The plaintiff filed suit for seeking declaration to the effect that the plaintiff is entitled to get her work charge services with effect from 20.10.1970 to 11.05.1976 regularised in view of the instructions issued by the defendants for the purposes of pension, gratuity, leave encashment and other retiral benefits. The suit was decreed. The appeal preferred by the defendants against the judgement and decree dated 06.08.2007 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Karnal, has been dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the defendants have filed the present regular second appeal. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellants. Nothing has been shown to take a contrary view to the one taken by both the Courts below. It cannot be said that the concurrent findings returned by both the Courts below are, either perverse or based on misreading of evidence. No question of law, much less substantial questions of law, arises for determination in the instant appeal. Resultantly, the regular second appeal is dismissed. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) JUDGE August 20, 2008 Mohan [NIRMALJIT KAUR] JUDGE July 31, 2008 mohan