IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 4TH APRIL 2008 / 15TH CHAITHRA 1930 RP.No. 356 of 2008() -------------------- (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN MACA. NO.788/2003 DT. 16.10.2007) REVIEW PETITIONER : APPELLANT ------------------------ VARGHESE S/O.THOMAS, KONNAMPILLY HOUSE PERAMBRA KODAKARA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.T.N.MANOJ RESPONDENTS: ------------- THE MANAGER UNITED INDIA INSURNCE CO.LTD KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SMT.P.A.RAZIYA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------- R.P.No.356 of 2008 ------------------------------- Dated this the 4th April, 2008. J U D G M E N T Heard both sides. Advocate Smt.P.A.Raziya takes notice for the respondent No.3. 2. It is pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that this Court has found that the Tribunal went wrong in fixing Rs.1000/= as income, after admitting Ext.A10 in evidence. It is also pointed out that this court found that the Tribunal ought to have taken 5% as disability. It is also submitted that in all cases, courts are granting 7.5 % as interest. Though I have found that the Tribunal is not justified in taking Rs.1000/= as income, it is not stated as to what amount should be taken as income. Though I have found 5% disability to be taken, that was also not quantified. All these errors are apparent on the face of records. So, the final judgment rendered by me on 16.10.2007 in M.A.C.A. No.788/2003 is reviewed and MACA is restored to file for re-hearing . Review petition is accordingly allowed. Post the MACA for re-hearing. K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, JUDGE nj.