"•%. ^i ^ . v:::;^^^~'-\ B llte^ip-'^l 1 ^y J, J '%^ ~^^^^^ ^ PETITIONERS/: (Applicants) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Writ Petition (Art. 2271 No.3878 of 2011 1. Visambhar Sahu, aged70 years 2. Lekhram Sahu, aged 48 years 3. Netram Sahu, aged 35 years 4. Bisahin Bai, aged 60 years, 5. Bisantin Bai, aged 58 years, 6. Shanti Bai, aged 56 years, 7. Godawari Bai/aged 32 years All sons and daughters of late Kejaoo Ram Sahu and R/o Tatibandh, Raipur (C.G.) 8. Khubiram Sahu, aged 45 years, S/o Shri Visambhar Sahu, R/o Tatibandh, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS/: (Non-applicants) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Collector Rajpur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Additional Collector and Competent Authority Urban Land Ceiling, Raipur (C.G.) {Writ petition underArtide 227 ofthe Constitution of India} Present: Mr. H.B. Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sareena Khan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sushil Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents. Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma. J ORAL ORDER (21-7-2011) 1. By this writ petition underArticle 227 ofthe Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged legality and propriety ofthe order dated 24-5-2011 passed by the competent authority in Ceiling Case No.770/A/90C(1) 78-79, whereby the competent authority has dismissed the application filed on behalf of the petitioners herein on the ground that possession of land under the provisions of Section 10 (3) ofthe Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short 'the Act') has already been taken over on 29-3-1981. 2. After arguing for some time, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the order passed by the competent authority is ':vyy '^,^ Soma appealable in terms of Section 33 ofthe Act and, therefore, the petitioners are having exhaustive remedy. Learned Senior Advocate seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the appellate forum. 3. The petition is dismissed aswithdrawn with liberty aforesaid. No order as to costs. Certified copy of the order impugned be returned to counsel for the petitioners on his submittjng the duly attested Photostat copy of the same. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge