1. si"©ie 8©nch IN THE^HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISeARH_AT BILASPUR (C.G.) w.p. rs) NO. 7303 /2011 PETITIONER \^'''^.'"°"_. ^y'y--:'\} y-:''"/^' "--"'\'1/ ...'•''€^' ..••'\ \?N ^y^-4^ ^ ^'\...- ^'" ^^ RESPONDENTS 1. ^ 2. 3: 4. ^ 5: 6. / Jaisingh Khusaro, aged about 52 years, S/o SabalsingK Khusaro, Lecturer, Government Higher Secondary School Lakhram. Block Bilha, bistt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education bepartment D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) The Director Public Instructions Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) Block Education Officer Bilha, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) Joint Director, Treasury, Account Pension, Bilaspur. (C.G.) The Principle, Government Higher Secondary School Lakhram Post Ratanpur bistt. Bilaspur (C.G.) ^ CA/V^ WRIT PETITEON UNbER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTCTUION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OP CHHATTSSGARH AT BIL^^PUR ^B : HON?BLB MR. JU8TICE PRITINKER DIWAKER PETITIONBR RESPOEdDENTs W.P.1SLN0.7303J2011 Jaisiugh Khusaro versus State of Chhattisgarh &, Otliers Shri K.S.Pawar, coiinsel for fhe petitioner. ShriYashwant Singh Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the State. WRJT PETITION UNDERJJRTICLB226 OF THE CONSTITUTIOH OFINDSA ORDER (03.12.2011) Grievance of the petitioner ia fhe present petition is that tiie petitioner was appoiated as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay scale of Rs, 150 aiid after coxnpletion of probation^ he was graated regular payscaleofRs. 169-300. Contention of tiie counsel for the petitioner is fliat he is entiUed for regular pay scale with effect from the date of iaitial appointment aad his case is squarely covered wifh nuniber of decisions passed by this Court aiid also th.e judgnient rendered by ttie M,P. State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpiir in O.A. No. 2745/89 ^Scidhukan.t Ya&u & 56 Ofthers Vs. State ^fSS.P. & Whers^ where m it has been held tliat similarly placed teachers are entitled for regular pay scale froni the date of tlierr mitial appoinifcment. It is not disputed by botli the parties that tiie inatter was taken up by fhe State to fhe Apex Court but the appeal was also dismissed by the Apex Court upholdiag fhe decision ofthe Tribunal to the effect tliat tlie Teachers/Assistaiit Teachers are entitled for regular pay scale from. tlie da.te of their io.itial appointiiient. In view of fhe above subniission m-ade by the counsel for tiie parties, the petition is disposed of ia the same terms i.e, tlie petitioner is granted liberty to niake a representation, if so advised, i3i a§pnf J^BAIIQ ja^upuj i -/PS 'MB\ rpiM goxrepjooo^ ui Ap.ou^s uopK^uosojdoj Qip. spp^p o^ A^ioqii ^B sq PIUOM pQUjQOUoo A^uoq^ire oq^ pxre ss^o srp. jo s^uoia oq^ uo uoiindo Aiie pQSs^jdxs ^ou saq ^jnoo siip ^ip jeop opBio: ST ^.i 's^o^j sipjo Axipnjos onp jsya jspjo Q^qeiius ss^d o^ s^uoip.nB ^ya^Q ^q^ mojj p^oodx^ si ^j •^SUTpJOODB J9T[3J 3UT8S O^ pQ^T^UQ 3q ABUI jguoT^ad 3^ 'SB'lO'eO ps^P JspJO Aq G6/S689 "ON (llATO) uo^^3cJ 3A^3q ]BI03dg UI ^JUOQ 3Ill9J[dnS oq^ Aq poiRjgaoo A^uonbosqns pire (Bjdns) np^A lireyiqpBp^ in veunquj, SAiqiBj^siaiuipv ^^S oq^ Aq psssed jspjo j^d SB Sax^ooj Qicres srp uo spxrB^s j:3uop.p.9d OTP. JI •QAp.OQdsjQd S^T UT pIIB SllUQUI UMO S^T UO 3S^3 Jl^qi. JQplSUOO O^ pQ^OAHp S? ^UQpUOdsQJ p9UJ30U03 ^V^ 'UJll^ UI pire (£/j 3J:UX3UUV) II 05* T*S P^^P -reino-no ^ip pTie i.usmgpnf pres9joje oi^ jo iqSn ^q^ (£)