IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1289 of 2006 MD.MADNI Versus MD.ZAKIR & ORS ----------- 3. 7.11.2008 Surendra/ No one appears for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the reasons weighing upon the court below in rejecting the belated application seeking amendment in the plaint cannot be said to be based on any jurisdictional error. The court below has noted the attitude of the plaintiff petitioner in delaying disposal of the suit, inasmuch as even when the evidence was led by both the parties and arguments were completed, the plaintiff came out with an amendment application which was allowed by an order dated 6.4.2006. Thereafter in stead of completing the arguments and allowing the court to pronounce the judgment the petitioner came out with another amendment application which has been rejected by the impugned order. In that view of the matter, this Court would not find any error in the impugned order and accordingly, this civil revision application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)