IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23161 of 2007 RAVIKESH PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4. 8.9.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as well as opposite party no.2. The petitioner is an accused for an offence under sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is to the effect that the complainant gave him a sum of Rs.59,000/- on the assurance that the said money would be invested for the purchase of medicine and after having good return, it would be returned. The same having not been done, the complainant demanded his money on which a cheque of Rs.59,000/- is alleged to have been given by the petitioner to the complainant. However, the same was dishonoured for want of money in the account of the petitioner. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 submits that the petitioner intentionally gave the aforesaid cheque knowing fully well that there is no money in his account in order 2 to cheat the complainant. Learned counsel for the State submits that the offence as alleged is made out against the petitioner. Considering the allegation made in the complaint and the submissions as noticed above, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The application is, accordingly, dismissed. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)