IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 11546 of 2011-E Date of Decision 29th December, 2011 ________________________________________________________ 1. Mikhail son of Shri Tempu presently working as Beldar in P.W.D. Division Rampur, Tehsil Rampur, District Shimla HP 2. Bahadur Braik, son of Sh. Jagjeet Braik, r/o village Dkolar, P.O. Shingla, Tehsil Rampur Bushehar, District Shimla HP 3. Munish, son of Mohana, r/o Sarla Parog, P.O. Khanneri, Tehsil Rampur, District Shimla HP 4. Sh. Paras Nath, son of Sorahi, r/o Dakolar, P.O. Shingla. 5. Smt. Birso, wife of Sh. Bendhe r/o HPPWD Part Bungalow, Rampur Bushehar. 6. Smt. Pushpa, w/o Sh. Sudershan, r/o Sarla Parog, P.O. Khanneri, Tehsil Rampur, District Shimla HP 7. Atva Urave, s/o Sh. Lachoo rave r/o village Ghaso Pul, P.O. Khanneri, Tehsil Rampur, District Shimla HP 8. Gobind Ram, s/o Joban Dass, r/o village Banthana, P.O. Kushva, Tehsil Nirmand, District Kullu HP 9. Guda son of Sh. Bir Sai, r/o Sarla Parog, P.O. Khanneri, Tehsil Rampur, Distt. Shimla HP 10. Sh. Anil s/o Sh. Jatiya r/o Sarla Parog, P.O. Khanneri, Tehsil Rampur, District Shimla HP. 11. Smt. Litrain, w/o Sh. Mishrkan r/o village Ropru, P.O. Khanneri, Tehsil Rampur, Distt. Shimla HP. ……..Petitioners. Vs. 1. State of H.P. through its Principal Secretary, Department of H.P.P.W.D. to the Govt. of H.P. Shimla-2 2. The Executive Engineer, 11th Circle H.P.P.W.D. Division Rampur Bushehar, District Shimla HP. …..Respondents _______________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, J. ________________________________________________________________ For the Petitioners: Mr. B.N. Mehta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass, Sood, Addl. Advocate General, Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General and 2 Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Asstt. Advocate General. __________________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (oral) The petitioners claim work charge status/regularization on completion of eight years of continuous service as daily waged debldars. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No. 2735 of 2010, titled as Rakesh Kumar versus State of H.P. and others, decided on 28.7.2010. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. We are informed that the State has filed an appeal against the above mentioned decision. Therefore, it is made clear that the implementation of the judgment referred to above would depend on the outcome of the decision of the Apex Court. The needful action, after verifying the facts will be taken within a period of two months from the date of the judgment of the Apex Court. The petitioners will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the Writ Petition before the third respondent/competent authority. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. December 29, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge