upa 1 rp-l-52-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (LODGING) NO. 52 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.1473 OF 2010 ALONG WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 270 OF 2010 IN REVIEW PETITION (LODGING) NO. 52 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO. 1473 OF 2010 Adhishree Gopalkrishnan ).. Petitioner Versus Vibgyor High School and others ).. Respondents Ms. Avisha K. Gopalkrishnan-Mother of the Petitioner- present in person. Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Sanjay Jain and Mr.Nankani i/b Nankani & Associates for Respondent No.1. Mr. Prateek Sakseria i/b L.J. Law for Respondent No.2. Ms. S.M. Dandekar, Assistant Government Pleader, for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. Mr. Anand Grover with Mr. Prakash L. Mahadik for the Applicant in Chamber Summons. CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. AND S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, , J. Monday, August 30, 2010 P. C. : This petition is filed for review of our order dated 7th July 2010 by which we had disposed of Writ Petition (Lodging) No.1473 of 2010 in which we had observed that taking an overall view of the matter, upa 2 rp-l-52-10 interference of this Court was not warranted in the facts and circumstances of the case. We had also made clear that we did not find it necessary to decide the issue of maintainability of the petition and the right of the management of an unaided private school in the matter of granting admission to students. 2. The mother of the child who has filed this review petition does not dispute the fact that Adhishree was already admitted to a new school on 8th July 2010. No ground for review is made out as review is not supposed to be rehearing which is the attempt sought to be made by the petitioner’s mother. 3. The petitioner’s mother has voiced an apprehension that the dismissal of the petition by the impugned order dated 7th July 2010 may be treated as a stigma by other schools. 4. We make it clear again, what we had already made clear in our order dated 7th July 2010, that we have not gone into any allegations or counter-allegations by the parents of the petitioner or by the school management. Hence, there can be no question of any stigma being attached to the petitioner on account of disposal of petition by our order dated 7th July 2010. 5. Except this clarification, review petition stands disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.