IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 235 OF 2011 M/S GKB OPTOLAB PVT. LTD., REP. BY SHRI YOGESH PATHAK., ... Petitioner Versus GOA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (GIDC)., ... Respondent Mr. N. Sardessai, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A. D. Bhobe, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE & SMT. R. P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. Date:- 28th September, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. Sardessai, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bhobe, learned Counsel for the respondent. 2. Mr. Sardessai, learned Counsel for the petitioner states that liberty be granted to the petitioner to make representation to the respondent and the respondent may consider the same on its own merits. Mr. Sardessai further states that the petitioner will make representation to the respondent within one week from today. 3. Mr. Bhobe, learned Counsel for the respondent states that in case the petitioner makes the representation within one week, the respondent shall decide the same within four weeks. 4. In view of the above statements made by the learned Counsel for the parties, the petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make representation within one week to the respondent. If such representation is made, the respondent to decide the same on its own merits within four weeks thereafter. All the contentions of the parties are kept open. 5. The respondent shall not allot the plot allotted to the petitioner to any third person for a period of six weeks. Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMT. R. P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. SMA