IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH MAY 2010 / 29TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 13084 of 2010(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MIDHULA.K.C, W/O. VALSARAJ, UP SCHOOL ASSISTANT, VIM HIGH SCHOOL, P.O. PALLASSANA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. (RESIDING AT PULLIYALA NILAYAM, P.P. PALAYAM, KOLLENGODE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT) BY ADV. SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K. SRI.LIJU. M.P RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD. 3. THE MANAGER, VIM HIGH SCHOOL, PALLASSANA.P.O, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.DILIP MOHAN-R1,R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 13084 OF 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of May, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is presently working as U.P.School Assistant in VIM High School, Pallasana in Palakkad District. As per Ext.P1 order dated 01.06.2009, the petitioner was appointed against a resultant vacancy occurred in the post of U.P.S.A pursuant to the availing of Leave Without Allowance by Smt.S.Anitha kumari, who is a High School Assistant, for a period from 12.1.2008 to 11.1.2013. In fact, as against the said consequential vacancy, the senior most qualified U.P.School Teacher was promoted and in the resultant vacancy in the category of U.P.School Assistant fresh appointment was made. While so, one H.S.A in the school retired from service and against the said vacancy one U.P.S.A namely P.Sreelatha was promoted and appointed. Consequently, one Divya who was holding the post occurred consequent to the availing of L.W.A by Anitha Kumari, was accommodated against the said regular vacancy of U.P.S.A and the petitioner was appointed in the resultant W.P.(C) NO.13084/2010 2 vacancy. However, the second respondent declined to approve the appointment of the petitioner made as per Ext.P1 order. On being aggrieved by the said order viz., Ext.P2, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P3 Revision Petition before the first respondent under Rule 92 of Chapter XIV A of Kerala Education Rules (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules' only) . So far, no orders have been passed by the first respondent on Ext.P3 Revision Petition. It is in the said circumstances that this Writ Petition has been filed. 2. Considering the fact that Ext.P3 is a statutory Revision Petition filed under Rule 92 of Chapter XIV A of the Rules and the same is pending before the first respondent, I am inclined to dispose of this Writ Petition with a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 revision petition submitted by the petitioner, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of, accordingly. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc W.P.(C) NO.13084/2010 3 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. W.P.(C). NO. 13084 /2010 JUDGMENT 19th May, 2010