(,{SJY / /‘ IN THE HIGH couuzT' OF JUDICATuRE AT BILAsPUR TAx CASE No éw /2m:e: gémm 3§M§ . , 7 &® IL APPELLANT (The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax] Circle-2(1), Ruipur‘ vs ’R SPON R71”) NQWJ-Jw‘hr‘i Ramkrvishna Kalash, ' ‘ § ‘ 5W Prop. M/s uni’red Engineering Works, Ovf‘ Moudhapar'ci, Raipur (j\ . 2:. ‘ V9 @ _ “on < ,s in APPEAL UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961 We . . § XI»HC—78 mmw ammm WWW D.B. Hon’bie Shri Satish K‘ Ag Hcn’ble Shr§ Radha Shya: 29.012011 Shri Sameer Shrivastava, Advocaté for the appeiiant. Heard. the default, as pointed out by 1 he office, failing which the appeal shaif stand dismissed for want of prosecution, without reference to the Court. Sd/— ' Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 ashok ' 1ihotri & n Shanna, JJ. Sd/— R.S. Sharma' Judge As requested, two weeks tiLne is granted ta make good §§£§ 3§§