a’ IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 09” DAY OF NOVEMBER 2011 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTiCE V. JAGANNATHAN CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11339/2011 BETWEEN: RAMANGOUDA i RAMESH Sb. SHIVANGOUDA PATIL AGE. 26 YEARS, 0CC. AGRI., RIO. BADNUR, TQ. MUDHOL, DISTRICT BAGALKOT. PETITIONER (BY SF11 N.L. BATAKURKI, ADV.) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY PSI LOKAPUR P.S. DISTRICT BAGALKOT, REP BY S.P.P. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH, DHARWAD. RESPONDENT (BY SRI VINAYAK S. KULKARNI, H.C.G.P.) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 438 CR.P.C. SEEKING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN LOKAPUR P.S. CRIME NO. 103/2011 REGISTERED ON 12.09.2011 FOR THE ‘1 ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 323, 324, 307, 504 R W. SECTION 34 OF I.P.C. BY ALLOWLNG TIlE PETITION. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS I)AY. THE COURT MADE THE FOLWWING: ORDER Heard the learned counsel for petitioner. Sri N.L. Batakurki and also the learned High Court (ioiernment Pleader for the State, Sri Vinayak S. Kulkanii and also furnished the statement of objections filed by State. 2. The petitioner, who is accused No.1 seeks antic ipator3 bail as the case is registered against hint and se end others in Crime No. 103/201 1 for the vilenets punishable under Sections 323. 324, 307, 504 r ‘w. Section 34 of l.P.C. 3. The case of the prosecution is that, the complainant adtised the petitioner not to cause an3 nuisance under the ellen of alcohol and this is said to be the reason for the accused to have assaulted the complainant on 11 .09.2011 and the allegation is that the petitioner has assaulted Surcsh with axe on hip and accused No.2 assaulted Suresh with hands and threw him on the road and both the accused tried to kill the said Suresh. 4. In the light of the aforesaid complaint allegations and the investigation is still in progress. the petitioner is directed to move before Trial Court for regular bail and if the bail Petition is filed within 5 days from the date of this Order’s receipt, the same shall he considered in accordance with law. Petitioner is directed to furnish personal bond for 25,000/- with one surety for the likesum to the satisfaction of the Arresting Police Officer and shall co-operate with the Investigating Officer during investigation. Sd! JUDGE hnm CRL.P,NO, 1339/2011 VJJ: 16/11/2011 ORDER ON ‘BEING SPOKEN TO’ Heard both sides and it is clarified that the bond to be executed by the petitioner is in respect of he being released on bail, in the event of his arrest. Name of Sri. Srinivas B. Naik he shown as the counsel for the petitioner in the cause title. Sd/ JUDGE Dvr: