IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2078 OF 2006 PETITION NO.2078 OF 2006 PETITION NO.2078 OF 2006 Baisunisa Irshad Ahmed Shaikh ..Petitioner Vs. S.R.A. & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Dilip Rai, for the Petitioner Mr. G.D. Utangale, for Respondent No.1. Mr. M.M. Vashi, for Respondent No.4. Mrs. A.K. Savla, for Respondent No.2. Mr. M. More, AGP for Respondent No.3. CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. V.MOHTA, JJ. V.MOHTA, JJ. DATE: DATE: DATE: 18TH AUGUST,2006 18TH AUGUST,2006 18TH AUGUST,2006 P.C. . There is a S.R.A. Scheme. Annexure II has been issued as also LOI. The case of the petitioner is that the application has been rejected as ineligible. At the highest, therefore, what the petitioner can do is to prefer an Appeal against rejection of his claim. Considering that, this would not be a fit case for this Court to exercise its extra ordinary jurisdiction at the instance of the petitioner who at the highest can claim a right in the scheme. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.). V.MOHTA, J.). V.MOHTA, J.).