IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.No.69076 of 2011 & Criminal Misc.-M No.37479 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 20, 2011 Sheenam Sharma & another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr.P.S.Jammu, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Criminal Misc.No.69076 of 2011 Affidavit has now been filed by the Priest to say that he has performed this marriage and he is aware of all the Mantras. Taken on record. Application disposed of. Criminal Misc.-M No.37479 of 2011 The petitioners are seeking protection for their life and liberty as they have married against the wishes of their parents. The couple is present in the court. The petition is disposed of with a direction to the Superintendent of Police, Sirsa to look into the complaint of the petitioners and in case he finds that there is any threat to their life and liberty, he will take appropriate action on the said complaint. Superintendent of Police, Sirsa would be at liberty to ask the petitioners to reimburse the cost of protection in case it is required to be provided to the petitioners. The present order, however, shall not be deemed to be proof qua the factum/validity of their matrimonial alliance. December 20, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE