^ Single 3ench ^r IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITSON N0. 4-^- OF 2005 PETITIONER: ^^ w- RESPONDENTS: Kailash Chandra Das, aged about 41 years, son of Shri Janardan Das, presently posted and working as Sub Inspector, Reserve Police - Bijapur, Distt. Dantewada (Chhattisgarh) - Versus - State of Chhattisgarh, through : the Secretary, Department of Home, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Director General of Police, Police Head Quart:er, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Inspector General of Police, Bastar Range/ Distt. Bastar (Chhattisgarh). The Superintendent of Police, Distt. Dantewada (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLES 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^2. XI-HC—78 -STI^T^Tf^W 'c[^T3TR^T $h^sct) ^ ^1*<^11 <bNT^ 'S'ST "MNM^, ^Tll'H^Ko, f®!<r)m^< ^^...M:£.:./y..o^ RW^"""X""""""""""""'""^-T-^200 ^?T-'q'5RT ( ^cjf^^) ^^HW ^rf^T 3?1^T 25^)1-2005 ShriS.R.J. Jaiswal, counse Heard. By this petition the petitjon| for transfer from Bijapur to som^ therefore, a direction may be representations submitted by the <^i^?<yt^1'i ^H<nT "^ fest <rst^i< ^3?fma^r for the petitioner. T^r has ciajmed a reiiefthat his representation other place is not being considered and jissued to the respondents to decide the pttitioner in this regard. The transfer has been sou? at Bijapur for iast 15-16 years whic^i counset for the petitioner the pet there is no proper medical facj respondents ought to have considj transfer from Bijapur to some otheij Learned counsel for the p^ served if petitioner Is given iiberty forhis transfer outside Bijapur t^ stjpulatedperiod. After hearina counsel for ^vtf^- would be just and proper to rii?@^' respondents within ten days fromj such representation being mad^ |ht on the ground that the petitioner is ser^ing is a Naxaiite affected area. According to the Itioner is suffering from various ailments and ility avaiiable at Bijapur and therefore the sred the representation ofthe petitjonerfor his p!ace.-t®^?uw^t<"Al<^"4^ i^<4'<^\ ^e^v^l ' rtitioner submits that ends of justice wouid be o make representation before the respondents be considered by the respondents within a |ne peti^ioner this Court Is ofthe opinion that it the/petitioner to make representation to the |today, for his transfer outside Bijapur and on to the respondents, the same should be "3^ XI-HC—78 ^ii^i'^y Rt-tioh ?12H 3T?^T^Rte •< ^ '^ MWWl ^W^ 755T ^PTT^R, ^ti1y^(o,;fs|(yll^*4,< _^_M^f -^200 3^?r XR^ (i^t^<^) ^rmw 1Rft1cT ^H^T '2-- considered by them within a p^ representation is received by them. Ordered accordingly. With the obsen/ations made] in view of this order M.W.I disposed of. <=h}^t^l€?llT?PTOf ^ 'feTst <f^^K ^3f?N'3:?i^r riod of three months from the date the above the petition is disposed of. ^.No. 54/2005 and I.A. No. 161/2005stand Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge '^ ^