1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 418 OF 2008 Madhukar s/o Kondiram Tidke .. PETITIONER VERSUS Sau. Vandana w/o Madhukar Tidke .. RESPONDENT A.S. Shinde, Advocate for the petitioner. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 6 th July, 2009. PER COURT : 1 This court in view of order passed on 8-5-2009 directed the petitioner to deposit an amount of Rs.30,000/- towards arrears of maintenance within a period of eight weeks from the date of passing of the order. However, it is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not willing to deposit the amount as directed. 2 Petitioner is raising exception to the order passed by the courts below directing him to pay maintenance allowance to his wife at the rate of Rs. 1,000/- per month from the date of the application. The date of presentation of the application is 24-2-2004. The petitioner is in arrears of payment of maintenance to his wife. The courts below have concurrently held that the petitioner is liable to pay the amount of maintenance. Considering the concurrent findings recorded by the courts below and considering the 2 reluctance on the part of the petitioner to deposit part of the arrears of maintenance in this court, no interference is required to be caused in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Writ petition therefore stands rejected. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/cwp418.08.odt