IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32410 of 2009 KANHAIYA RAM, S/o Sri Nathuni Ram, resident of village-Mahdah, P.S.- Buxar (M), District-Buxar. ………..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ……….Opp. Party. ----------- 2/ 06.11.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is alleged to be the husband of the complainant and the case has been instituted under Sections 323, 498 ‘A’ of the IPC and section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a false allegation has been made against the petitioner and he is not the husband of the complainant. Complainant has solemnized her re-marriage with Bhagwan Ram. So, section 498 ‘A’ of IPC is not attracted. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of above named petitioner is allowed. He is directed to be released on bail on his surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, in connection with Complaint Case No. 433 (C)/2007 subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)