-: 1 :- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITON NO. 255 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLIATION NO. 13 OF 2010 IN CONTEMPT PETITON NO. 255 OF 2008 Freny K. Sirwalla. ..Petitioner. Versus Mrs. Veera Darayus Mundroina. ..Respondent. Mr. C. N. Chavan for the petitioner. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : March 4, 2010. P. C. : 1. Heard Mr. Chavan, learned counsel for the applicant / petitioner. None appears for the respondent despite service. 2. The petitioner is a landlady of the premises more appropriately described in prayer clause (a) of the plaint in RAE &R Suit No. 3388 of 1985. The trial Court passed decree of eviction in favour of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide requirement which decree is confirmed upto the High Court. The respondent obstructed the execution by filing objections before the executing Court. The objections were also dismissed by a speaking order by the executing Court and this order is also confirmed upto the High Court in Writ Petition No. 10129 of 2009. 4. The petitioner has filed the above contempt petition as the respondent tried to defeat and frustrate the eviction decree passed in her favour. By the order dated 18th November 2009, the Court Receiver, High -: 2 :- Court, Bombay was appointed as a receiver in respect of the suit premises. This order was challenged in Contempt Appeal No. 2 of 2009. The said appeal was also dismissed by the Division Bench on 8th February 2010. Thereafter the Court Receiver has taken forcible possession of the suit premises from the respondent and handed over to the petitioner. In these facts and circumstances the present application is preferred to discharge the Court Receiver. Since the petitioner has got possession of the suit premises, her purpose is served and therefore nothing survives in the Contempt petition. Civil application and contempt petition accordingly stand disposed of. 5. The Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay is discharged without passing any accounts. The Court Receiver is directed to refund the balance amount deposited by the petitioner after deducting their usual cost, charges and expenses. (R.V. MORE, J.)