IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14351 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 08, 2011 Sunil Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.J.S.Dahiya, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The father of the petitioner died in the year 1994. He had moved the application for compassionate appointment in the year 2004. The petitioner claims to have been offered compassionate assistance of ` 2.50 lacs. The petitioner served a legal notice in the year 2008 for appointment and did not accept this offer. If that be so, the petitioner may represent to the respondents, who should consider his case sympathetically as his father was lowly placed Mali. If earlier this offer was made to the petitioner for grant of compassionate assistance, the same may be considered in that light and assistance allowed, if otherwise permissible under law. The writ petition is disposed of. August 08, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE