IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14050 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 04, 2011 Puneet Sagar & another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Dr.Pankaj Nanhera, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioners claim similar benefits of pay fixation as has been given to some other similarly situated employees. For the same cause, the petitioners have filed number of representations. Without going into the merits of the claim made, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the pending representations of the petitioners. The petitioners, if so advised, may supplement said representations by filing a fresh one within a period of two weeks from today. The necessary orders on the representation be passed within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. August 04, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE