IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.667 of 2011 MD. SIDDHU @ SUDHU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 28.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with K. Nagar P.S. Case No.214 of 2010 registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Admittedly, informant got a message that his brother met an accident and having got the aforesaid message he went at the place of occurrence where he found his brother in unconscious state, and while his brother was being taken to hospital he succumbed to his injuries. It is stated that in course of noticing the injury the informant observed that the injury has been caused by sharp edged weapon on the head of his brother, and accordingly, he doubted that his brother had been killed by petitioner and other persons with whom there was some inimical terms on account of tenancy dispute. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that not a single witness of place of occurrence has claimed to have seen the killing of the deceased, rather almost all the witnesses have stated that deceased had met an accident. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor concedes the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Md. Siddhu @ Sudhu be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnia in connection with K. Nagar P.S. Case No.214 of 2010. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)