THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.13993 OF 2011 ORDER:- This petition is filed to quash the order of the Special Judge for CBI Cases at Nampally, Hyderabad, in S.R.No.3882 of 2011. 2. The petitioner, who is an Advocate, filed a private complaint before the Special Judge for CBI Cases at Nampally, Hyderabad to take cognizance of the offences under Sections 120-B read with Section 166, 167, 409 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13(1)(c) (d), 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against some of the Ministers and also the Secretaries of the Government. His contention is that all these people have abused their power and committed acts of irregularities. The reason for this complaint to be initiated is the fact that in a Public Interest Litigation in W.P.No.794 of 2011 and connected batch, the High Court has directed to investigate into some of the allegations alleged in that complaint. In that case, the Division Bench has directed the CBI to enquire into the particulars of the allegations. It is not in dispute that the investigation is still in progress. The apprehension, apparently, of the petitioner is that the persons against whom he proposed to file the private complaint may not be questioned or their acts will not be considered. At this stage, it is very difficult to accept this apprehension. Further-more, the private complaint is filed against the respondents on the ground that they have committed corrupt practices by using their position and this fact is linked with the investigation ordered by the Division Bench to be conducted by the CBI. Therefore, there cannot be any parallel enquiry to be taken up by the CBI Court. If there are any deficiencies in the investigation taken up by the CBI, which wanted to be projected in the complaint, he can approach the Division Bench in the above Public Interest Litigation for necessary directions. But, however, the presentation of this complaint at this stage is not warranted and it being premature and the allegations there being not established by any evidence supported by the complainant. Section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code at this stage has no application. Therefore, the private complaint has been rightly rejected by the lower Court. But, however, the right of the petitioner to approach the Division Bench or to initiate any complaint after the investigation done by the CBI in case he has got any right to proceed can be considered. With the above observation, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. ___________________________ JUSTICE N.R.L. NAGESWARA RAO Date: 29-12-2011 Note: Issue C.C. today. (B/o). INL/MR