IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.856 of 2009 ***** Hafiz Md. Sanaullah, s/o Md. Noor Ullah, r/o Village-Mahua Tola Sohsarai, P.S.- Sohsarai, Distt.-Nalanda. …. …. Petitioner-Appellant. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Bihar at Patna. …. …. Respondents-Respondents ----------- For the Appellant : Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For Respondent no.1: Mr. Md. Anis Akhtar, Assistant Counsel to Additional Advocate General-X For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Sunil Kumar Mandal, Advocate For Respondent NCTE: Mr. S.N.Pathak, Advocate ----------- 2. 22.01.2010. The appellant, if we allow ourselves to say so, has an indefatigable attitude to prosecute a cause as if the cause he sanguinely feels to exist must come to a logical end, though, the logic, as conceived by the appellant, does not remotely appear to be in existence. To put it succinctly, he has sought the result of the examination, namely, Primary Teachers Training Examination which he had undertaken in January, 1988 and, claimed to have passed, though declared to have been failed. What could have been done at that point of time cannot be done in presenti as the time, the greatest enemy of humanity, destroys causes in its glory. - 2 - Be it noted, the initial attempt was after a ‘Yug’, possibly thinking an action can survive for a period of 12 years. But in the factual scenario the same has to pave the path of dismissal. The untiring spirit of the appellant may be welcome in the individual realm but when it comes to the adjudication arena, it has to pale into insignificance. Hence, we perceive no merit in this appeal and accordingly the same stands dismissed in limine. Pawan/- (Dipak Misra, CJ) (Shiva Kirti Singh, J)