1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 306/2010 Mrs. Pranita Mahesh Revanwar vs. Mr. Mahesh Shrikantrao Revanwar =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-== Mrs. Vaishali Kadekar, Counsel for Applicant C ORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 8th JUNE, 2010. Mr. A. Kulkarni, counsel for the respondent files power and reply to the transfer petition. Heard. 3) The unfortunate feud and bickering between the couple is, the husband filed matrimonial proceedings for divorce at Pune. The wife/petitioner resides at Nagpur, claims to be a practicing lawyer, while husband is Software Engineer and naturally in service. The wife by the present application urged to transfer the divorce proceedings being HMP NO. 88/2010, pending before the learned C.J.S.D., Pune, to Nagpur. 4) Though the wear-tear in the life has turned into seeking divorce, however, the travel of wife/petitioner from Nagpur to Pune can well be compensated by 2 directing the husband to make remittance for such travel undertaken by the wife and also an escort whenever the matter is fixed at the Court at Pune. 5) Normally if a transfer is sought, the convenience of wife is to be looked upon. However, in the fact situation, as the wife claiming to be a practicing lawyer can accommodate her schedule, while husband being a employed person, will not get any accommodation from his employer. The difficulties for husband would be far reaching, even adversely affecting his job. 6) Considering ground realities, the application seeking transfer is rejected. However, the wife shall be entitled to claim transport charges and also lodging/boarding charges and escort, which she will assess and communicate to the learned C.J.S.D. and upon such communication, the husband will ensure to make remittance of the same on or before the next date of hearing of said HMP pending before the Court at Pune. Application dismissed. No costs. (K.U.Chandiwal) JUDGE. Rvjalit