1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5306 OF 2006 Dattaji s/o Venkatrao Patil, Age: 30 years, Occ: Advicate R/o. at Post Davanihipparga, Tq. Devani, Dist. Latur. .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2. The Collector, Latur, Dist. Latur. 3. The Chief Officer, Udgir Municipal Council, Udgir, Tq. Udgir Dist.Latur. 4. Usha d/o Manohar Kamble, Age: 32 years, Occ: Social work & President of Municipal Council, Udgir, Tq. Udgir, Dist.Latur. 5. Kamble Bhanudas Kishan. 6. Kamble Baliram Kishan. 7. Kamble Shivdas Kishan. 8. Kamble Manohar KIshan. (Notices to be served through..Respondents Chief Officer, Udgir) 2 ... Mr. R.D. Biradar, Advocate for petitioner. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. P.S. Shendurnikar, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 and 4. Mr. N.B. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent Nos. 5 to 8. ... CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 11TH JANUARY, 2010 PER COURT : Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, petition is taken up for final hearing at admission stage. 2. Heard Counsel for the parties. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed as under. "(A) Rule may kindly be issued. 3 (B) The Record and Proceedings be called. (C) The Respondent No. 2 may kindly be directed to make an enquiry in the corruption in allotment of houses under the 'Walmiki Ambedkar Awas Yojna' in Taluka Udgir, Dist. Latur and to take appropriate action against the guilty persons. (D) The Respondent No. 2 may kindly be directed to make an enquiry and to take appropriate action in the matter of purchasing of oil and diesel for vehicles belonging to Municipal Council, Udgir from the Petrol Pump of the Respondent No. 4. (E) Any other appropriate relief in the eyes of justice may kindly be granted in favour of the petitioner." 3. The affidavit of respondent No. 2 dated 11-01-2010 refers to the fact that the inquiry in respect of both the issues raised by the petitioner have been undertaken by an Officer, no less than the Collector, Latur. The report of the Collector, Latur is also placed on record. We are in agreement with the stand 4 taken by the respondents that the Collector has inquired into both the aspects raised by the petitioner and specifically referred to in the relief clauses of the Writ Petition. In that sense, the petition is worked out. No further directions have been claimed in the present petition. In the circumstances, this petition is disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to pursue such other remedy as may be available in law. All questions are kept open to be considered on its own merit. 4. Rule discharged. ( S.S. SHINDE, J. ) ( A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.) sut/JAN10/wp5306.06