IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4362 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4362 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4362 OF 2006 IN IN IN REVIEW PETITION LODGING NO.29 OF 2006 REVIEW PETITION LODGING NO.29 OF 2006 REVIEW PETITION LODGING NO.29 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL NO.240 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.240 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.240 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.2175 OF 2002 WRIT PETITION NO.2175 OF 2002 WRIT PETITION NO.2175 OF 2002 Mrs.Dhanashri Dashrath Apraj .. Petitioner V/s M/s.Padmarag Co-op.Hsg.Soc.Ltd. & Ors. .. Respondents Petitioner in person present. Ms.Mugdha Jadhav, AGP for Respondent Nos.3 to 5. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 4th September, 2007. DATE : 4th September, 2007. DATE : 4th September, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Petitioner in person and the learned AGP for Respondent Nos.3, 4 & 5. By this Notice of Motion, the Petitioner is seeking condonation of 90 days’ delay in filing the Review Petition. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Petitioner. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)