CRM No. M-9922 of 2009 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-9922 of 2009 Date of Decision: 02.07.2009 Bohar Singh .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .....Respondent AND CRM No. M-10594 of 2009 Date of Decision: 02.07.2009 Sham Singh and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab .....Respondent Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. C. Puri Present:- Mr.O. P. Kamboj , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sudhir Nehra, Addl. A. G. Punjab. K. C. Puri, J (Oral) By this common order, I intend to dispose of CRM No. M- 9922 of 2009, titled Bohar Singh v. State of Punjab and CRM No. M-10594 of 2009, titled Sham Singh and another v. State of Punjab as both arise from the same FIR. Petitioners Bohar Singh, Sham Singh and Mohinder Singh have applied for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 52 dated 27.3.2009, under Sections 420, 468, 471 IPC, P. S. Jalalabad City, District Ferozepur. As per allegations of the prosecution, the petitioner Bohar Singh entered into an agreement to sell his land in the name of complainant Surjit Kaur and Surjit Kaur paid the full consideration of Rs.15,18,281/- and Bohar Singh executed general power of attorney in favour of daughter-in- law of Surjit Singh namely Sarabjit Kaur. It is further alleged that Bohar Singh petitioner got cancelled power of attorney and had sold the above said land to Kulwinder Singh son of Mohinder Singh. CRM No. M-9922 of 2009 2 It is further alleged that the land allotted to Bohar Singh could not be sold for 20 years but petitioner Sham Singh and Mohinder Singh procured the jamabandi in which there is no note to the said effect. Lateron, the period of 20 years was reduced to 10 years and after reducing the period, the land was alleged to have been sold in favour of Kulwinder Singh son of Mohinder Singh. As per report of the Tehsildar, Sham Singh and Mohinder Singh in connivance with Bohar Singh have made the above said transactions. The complainant has been deprived of a huge amount. The gravity of offence does not made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail. Therefore, both the petitions stands dismissed. July 02, 2009 ( K. C. Puri ) mamta Judge