w ^ l^. ^A Petjtioner Respondenis HiGH GOURT GF CHHATriSQARH: BiLASPUR I.. . -.;:- :• ' - WritPstition (S)iNo. 4028 of 2008 G/L. Kangan, aged 62 years. son of Shri Kirit ^ Ram, resident of C-40, Rajaswa Coiony, - Sarkanda,;TahsI! Sc Distt. Bjiaspur (CG). Versys .1^ 1) Accountart General, Chnattisaarh, Raipur 2) CoiJector (Eiection Section}, Biiaspur (CG). 3) State of Ghhattisgarh through Djstrict Eiedlon officer, BJtaspur(CG). i tWrit Petition under Artlcje 226 of the Constitirtion of tndia) SB: Hon'bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Presersfc . Shri K.L,.Pandey,.counse!-forthepetitioner j Shri Ajay Baralk, Advocate appears on. behalf of Shri .S.K.' Beriwal " Standingcounsel.fbr Union ofindja. | Smt SmrtaGhai, Panei La\wer for theState. | 08ALORDER ' . •1 '. , -'i - • • (Passedon Shis 3QBl dayofJuly, 2008) With consent of iearned counsei appearing for the parties, tne matter is heard finaily. ..• '; . ;, . ^••..., • , ', ' ' ,. • \.^ . ' " ./ 2) This case pertains to grievance of non-grant of retlrai dues. 3) Thss Court, in the matter of VV.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandai Vs. The State of Chhattlsgarh & others) and. other conneded matters, directed the Commjttee to con&ider the matter of retriai dues as the disputed .qUestion of faote were invoived. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19-06-2006 passedinW.P.No.1961/20D6 (Smf. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and ,others), and order dated 13-3-2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh andothers Vs. Baijnatn Mandai and canother). Thus, this petrtion is sauareiy eovered by the judQment and order dated 31SS J^nuary, 2008 passed in W.P.No. 4642/2004 (Baljnath Mandai (supra) ) as submitted fc>y iearned counsei sppearing for the parties. • • •• ' ' . . •; • . '. .. ; . • ' • .: •:•. •i:'. .. •"•.•:. •"• F€ ^v' -fe^s. Raju -2 '^ 4) Thss petJtion is accordingiy disposedl of in the same terms i.e^ the office of the Advocate General is dlrected to send the case to the Committee, wjthln a period of 15 days from tne date of receipt of a copy of this order. Tbereafter, the Committee shail issue notice to the petitioner, officers concerned and respondent No.4 within a further periodof 15 days. Tl"ie Committee shaEi consider and pass order, in accordance with iaw, after affordjng proper opportunity of hearing to the petitloner. The petitloner and the officers concerned mayfiie additionaf documents, if necessary. The entire exercise; inciudingpaymentofretirai dues, if any, to the petitioner, be compieted within a period df four months from the date of r'eceipt of a copy of,this order. 5) The petitioner shaii suppiy one complete sefc of the;petition to the^State counsei as weii as counsel for Union af inaia fcr tran^ferring,, the same to the Commlttee. 6) In case of gnevance with regard to non-payment of penslonery dues, /jt Is noi: neoessary to fiie a writ petition before this Court directiy,\ : :r"he representation/appiicatjon can be moved before the Pension Commlttee as stated above. The Pension Committee snail, not refu&e to entertain tne representation/appilcatson, sf so fiied djrectly; Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge