IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14161 of 2010 ANJIT KUMAR @ BHINDA, SON OF LATE RAM CHANDRA PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 14.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 498(A), 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that in the First Information Report itself it has been stated that it was the petitioner who had given information about the death of his wife to the Informant. The further submission is that there is material in the case diary to suggest that in fact, the deceased had jumped into the well and died on account of it. However, on going through the case diary and the post mortem examination report, it appears that there were ante mortem injuries on the person of the deceased and death was not on account of drowning. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)