IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23815 of 2011 Sarjug Prasad @ Saryug Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 20.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Rahui Polilce Station Case No. 94 of 2011 registered under Sections 341,323,379,504,370,307,506 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel of the petitioner submitted that the daughter-in-law of the petitioner, namely, Kasal Bharati and the informant, Ashok Kumar, both were contesting in the panchayat Election for the post of Mukhiya. The supporter of the informant, namely, Mukesh Kumar, came at the door of the petitioner and started abusing and fired from his gun , as a result of which, one Manoj Kumar sustained gun shot injury in his hand and and brought to P.H.C Rahui for treatmentand Rahui P.S Case No. 95/11 under Sections 307,504, 506 of the Indian Penal code & 27 Arms Act has been lodged. Present case is only counter blast of that case The allegation against the petitioner is of making 2 firing twice out of which one hitted the informant causing injury. Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail stands rejected. However, it is made clear that the trial court will not be prejudiced by this order at the time of hearing of regular bail petition of the petitioner and the same shall be disposed of on its own merit taking into consideration the nature of injury. Namita ( Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)