IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5741 of 2010 SUDAMA YADAV, Son Of Rikhideo Yadav, Resident Of Village Ram Fal Ke Dera, P.S. Barahara (Khawashpur Out Post), District- Bhojpur At Arrah ……….. Petitioner Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ……………. Opp.Party ----------- 2. 26/02/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case is under sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against petitioner is of having stolen away certain articles from the house of the informant in the dead of night. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is enmity between the parties and petitioner is having his land just next to the house of the informant on which informant throws his waste materials which was earlier objected by the petitioner. It is submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedents and he is in jail since 28.11.2009. Considering the above submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, this application is allowed. Let petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the - 2 - satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arrah at Bhojpur in Barahara (Khawaspur) P.S.Case No.82 of 2008 with conditions as laid down in Sub-Section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh, J.)