1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Thirtieth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15658 of 2011 NEPPOLIYAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.4 Vs STATE REP. BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE C.C.I.W.CID, THANJAVUR POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT CR NO. 7/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. B.JAMEELARASU Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as accused and he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 09.11.2011 for the alleged commission of offences under Sections 408, 409, 465, 467, 468, 471, 477(A) r/w. 109 I.P.C., in Crime No.7 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2.Heard Mr.B.Jameelarasu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is an innocent person. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for bail. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) would submit in his argument that the de-facto complainant is the Deputy Registrar of the a Society. He would further submit in his argument that the de-facto complainant conducted enquiry on the administration of the Society and submitted a report that the petitioner/accused and others created forged documents and records as if gold loan was sanctioned to the petitioner and misappropriated the Society funds. He would further submit in his argument that the investigation is still pending and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, suitable conditions may be imposed for the secured presence. 5.Considering the submission made on both sides, I could see that the petitioner is undergoing incarceration right from 09.11.2011, this Court https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on condition that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only)to the credit of Crime No.7 of 2011 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai and on receipt of the same, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. sd/- 30/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PATTUKOTTAI. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THANJAVUR AT KUMBAKONAM. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE C.C.I.W.CID, THANJAVUR POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 5. THE OFFICER IN-CHARGE, SUB JAIL, PATTUKKOTTAI. +1. CC to M/S. B.JAMEELARASU Advocate SR. No. 41978 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15658 of 2011 Date :30/11/2011 RJ/1.12.11 (IT) 2p/7c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/