:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3209 OF 2004 OF MOTION NO.3209 OF 2004 OF MOTION NO.3209 OF 2004 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (L) NO. 685 OF 2004 (L) NO. 685 OF 2004 (L) NO. 685 OF 2004 IN IN IN ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO PETITION NO PETITION NO.257 OF 2004 257 OF 2004 257 OF 2004 Shri.Sai Enterprises .. Applicant V/s Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. & Anr.. Respondents ----- CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 10TH MARCH, 2006. : 10TH MARCH, 2006. : 10TH MARCH, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. By this Notice of Motion, the Applicant is seeking condonation of 15 days delay. Perused the Notice of Motion and the affidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)