mamm (Wu) WW m zoo t mmm mm§fg€1m %3if?mm W.P. s (Pe‘rifi‘on U/A 226' PEI'ITIONERS 1. RESPONDENTS 1. Present: Mr. Ashish Shrivasmva , Adv. for1 Mr. Rakesh Pandey, Advocate for esponden’r No.3 & 4. 01 . 10 .2008 Smf. Shagu1 years, R/o (Chhumsgur Ku. Shabana R/o Pendra F Smf. Ruksan years, R/o Bilaspur (Chi Sm'r. Tarann years, R/o Bilaspur‘ (Chl Versus S‘l'aTe of d Administrafh Bhawan, Raip The Collecfox Nagar‘ Panch< Panchayat 6‘ 9f Consfh‘u‘rion of India) fa Parveen, W/o Mohd. Ayaz, Aged abouf 3O Pendra Road, Gaur‘ella, h). Begum, D/o Mohd. Isiam, Aged abou‘r 24 years, toad, GuureHa, Dis’rricf Bilaspur (Chhaffisgarh). 5 Ear‘ki, W/o Shri Parvez Ahmed, Aged abom‘ 31 Bunder Nagar, Pendra Road, Gaurella, Disiric’r hattisgarh). um Johan, W/o Shafiq Ahmed, Aged abouf 28 Tikar Kalan, Pendra Road, Gaurella, Dis’rricf Haf‘risgarh). mhaiiiSQarh, Through: the Secretary, Urban re Deparfmen‘r, Manfralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Jr' (Chhaf’risgar‘h). ', Disfr'icf Bilaspur (chhaffisgarh). lyaT, Through ifs Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar :ureiia, Dissrict Bilaspur (Chhaftisgarh). he peTHioner. Mr.Ajay Dwivedi, Govt. Advocafe or the 5mm. Disfr‘icf Bilaspur $Wu m gamma, W —Fsn97i3/2008 40,000, W (Single Bench; Hon'ble Mr. Jusfice Dhirendra Mishra) No.5550/2008 @ WW ....................................-...............m zoo 3€wawm$aawmmma%%wm§ WW (Waaqa) mama-i mmgfwmm WWW&%€IWR $aimm Y By This pefi‘rion The pe‘rifioner‘ has prayed for a direc‘rion fo fhe respondem‘s fo release ’rhe of The fhe salary pefifioners from fhe period 12.1.2006 fo 15.4.2008 along with inferes‘r af Th‘te market ra're. Learned counsel for ‘rhe petiti ners submi’rs fha’r fhe pefi‘rioners' services were illegally Terminated vide ord r da’red 12.1.2006 (Annexure P2). The pe’rifioners filed W.P. Nos.296/06, 2 5/06, 294/06, 293/06 againsf ’rheir order of ferminafion and This CourT vide daTed or er 5.3.2008 allowed The peTiTions of The peTiTioners and quashed The TerminaTion order of The peTiTioners. RespondenTs in compliance of The ord r passed This order of passed by CourT, passed an of Annexure P-6 and posted The peTi ioners in Their respecTive posTs in The concerned school as before. The Tioners ThereafTer pe approached respondenT No.3 vide Annexure P-7 and praye for salary for The period 12.1.2006‘To 15.4.2008, however, Their represen aTion for The back wages has noT been decided by respondenT No.3. /._ Learned counsel for responde T No.3. & 4 submiTs ThaT represenToTion of' The peTiTioners shall be decided by r spondenT No.3 & 4 wiThin a period of four weeks. In view of The above submissi n of learned counsel for respondenT No.3 & 4, The insTanT peTiTion is disposed of iTh a direcTion To respondenT No.3 To 4 To decide The represenTaTion of The p iTioner (Annexure P-7) wiThin a period of four weeks in accordance wiTh law. . soj— l ‘Vrrbzhirendra Misma 3‘ CerTified copy as per rules. Judge swift? Mu WWI. WW iiIS/i97m3/2ons —4o.ooo.