THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL No.180 of 2010 June 21, 2010 Between: Syed Sirajuddin, S/o.Syed Ali … Appellant And The Superintendent of Police, Medak at Sangareddy And others ... Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL No.180 of 2010 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) The appellant is statedly owner of land admeasuring Acs.14.29 guntas comprised in various survey numbers situated at Kavali Village of Koheer Mandal in Medak District. It appears, there are suits being O.S.No.228 of 2005 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Sangareddy, and O.S.No.25 of 2009 on the file of the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Zaheerabad, pending between the appellant and respondents 3 to 6. It is also the case of appellant that he obtained interlocutory orders in these suits against the contesting respondents. In spite of the same, they are allegedly committing theft of crop. Therefore, appellant gave a report to the Station House Officer, P.S. Koheer, on 28.1.2010, in vain. He therefore filed writ petition being W.P.No.3316 of 2010 seeking a direction to second respondent to take action on the report/complaint. This Court by impugned order dismissed the writ petition observing that when two suits are pending, nothing prevents the appellant to move appropriate applications against the contempting respondent and even against third parties by filing necessary applications. After hearing the counsel for appellant, we are convinced that writ petition as alleged is not maintainable. When the suits are pending between the parties, intervention of Police is not ordinarily called for. All the rights and obligations have to be worked out in civil litigation. If there is any threat of dispossession by unlawful means or breach of interlocutory order, it is always open to appellant to invoke the incidental powers of Civil Court by filing appropriate applications under relevant provisions of Code of Civl Procedure, 1908. The writ appeal, with the above observations, is dismissed. ______________ (V.V.S. RAO, J) __________________________ (VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR, J) June 21, 2010 YS