1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4416 OF 2009 Mangalatai Manohar Jadhav ... Petitioner V/s. Shripal Bhau Chavan & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. V.B. Rajure for the Petitioner. Mr. T.S. Ingle for Respondent Nos.1 to 6. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATE : 7TH MAY, 2009. P.C. : 1. This Petition can be conveniently disposed of at the stage of admission as respondent Nos.1 to 6 are represented by Mr. Ingle. Mr. Rajure appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to delete respondent Nos.7, 8 and 9. Leave granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2 2. The petitioner’s grievance is that her request to the Trial Court to grant her some time for depositing Rs.15 lacs has been refused by the Trial Court. The petitioner has filed a suit for specific performance against the respondents. Since the respondents filed their written statement contending that they were willing o execute the contract, the trial court by an order dated 6th February, 2009 directed the petitioner to deposit an amount of Rs.15 lacs, which was the balance consideration by 8th March, 2009. On 6th March, 2009 the petitioner preferred an application seeking extension of the time to deposit the amount. That application was rejected by an order dated 1st April, 2009. While doing so, the trial court permitted the petitioner to deposit the amount by 8th April, 2009. This order has been challenged in the present petition. 3. It is urged on behalf of the petitioner that some indulgence be shown to her so that she could deposit the amount of 3 Rs.15 lacs within a reasonable time. 4. Although in my opinion sufficient time has been granted to the petitioner to deposit the amount, it would be appropriate to extend the time in the facts and circumstances of this case. Accordingly the period is extended upto 10th June, 2009. In case the amount of Rs.15 lacs is not deposited by the petitioner within that period, the consequences will follow. 5. The Petition is disposed of. .......