IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1739 of 2009 JAI KANT PD.NIRAJ Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 4/2/2009 Heard Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh, counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. In this case order of transfer of the petitioner dated 30th June, 2008 has been set aside by the Government on the ground that his earlier posting at Gopalganj was for a very short period. On being asked, counsel for the petitioner could not explain as to what was the earlier period of posting at Gopalganj and in the writ petition also there is no averment to that effect. The net position, therefore, emerges that the Project Coordinator has issued certain order of transfer in favour of the petitioner on 30th June, 2008 which according to the petitioner was also implemented, but the Government ultimately found that such order of transfer was bad. Exercise of power by the Government to review the order of subordinate authority cannot be faulted with. 2 The next question is that if the petitioner has certain grievance with regard to joining at the earlier post of posting in view of his retirement in the month of August, 2009, the petitioner may always represent his case before the Secretary of the Minor Irrigation Department who is expected to pass order in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. This would dispose of this writ application. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar