IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.6231 of 2010 (O&M ) Date of Decision : 27.9.2010 R.D.Tagra ....Petitioner Versus Smt. Raj Mehta and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Hari Om Attri, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. There is no legal infirmity in the impugned order. The petitioner filed a suit for recovery in the first instance and now after a lapse of four years of its subsistence he chooses to make an application for converting the same into a suit for specific performance. The amendment has rightly been declined as it would alter the entire nature of the suit which is impermissible and, therefore, the trial court was right in declining the prayer. Dismissed. 27.9.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss