HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD Criminal Petition No.7565 of 2009 Dated : 17.09.2009 Between : S.Naga Ramchandra Murthy and others ….. Petitioners a n d 1) Smt.S.Madhavi 2) The State of A.P. ….. Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD Criminal Petition No.7565 of 2009 ORDER: Heard Sri B.S.S.Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri A.Ramesh, learned counsel representing the learned Public Prosecutor for the second respondent. No notice is being ordered to the first respondent as the matter is being disposed of at the stage of admission. The petitioners are facing prosecution in C.C.No.477 of 2009 on the file of the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri, for the alleged offences punishable under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The Police after investigation into crime No.52 of 2009 found ex facie reason to believe the committal of the said offence by the petitioners and the matter is yet to be tried on merits by the trial Court. What the petitioners contend herein is that they are falsely implicated and that it was the conduct of the defacto complainant as detailed by them in the criminal petition that led to the filing of O.P. No.1255 of 2008 by the first petitioner for dissolution of the marriage after which this private complaint was filed as a counter blast. The truth or otherwise of the claims of either the first respondent or the petitioners concerning the causes that led to the marital discomfort have to be enquired into and decided on merits by the trial Court on the oral and documentary evidence to be placed before it during trial, but not by this Court in a restricted summary enquiry under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The inherent jurisdiction is available only in rarest of rare cases and this Court cannot be a forum for any deep probe into disputed questions of fact. Therefore, it is not a fit case where the request for quashing of the proceedings can be entertained. In the result, the criminal petition is dismissed. ______________________ G.BHAVANI PRASAD, J 17th September, 2009 SUR