IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41207 of 2008 UPENDRA MAHTO SON OF SRI SARJUG MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- POKHRAIRA, P.S.-MUFASSIL, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.10.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is named accused of a case which has been registered under sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently section 409 of the Indian Penal Code was added. The allegation is that the petitioner and another co-accused involved themselves in misappropriating government money and in course of inspection it was found that money showing fake working days was misappropriated by the petitioner and another co-accused. The submission is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated by the B.D.O. who in collusion with local leaders had conspired to implicate the petitioner and another co-accused on fake allegation that labourers were not paid due wages. Eleven labourers gave written petition in which they stated that they have been paid their due wages. Be that at it may, petitioner, Upendra Mahto, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Samastipur Town (Mufassil) P.S.Case No.62 of 2008. Md.S. (Shyam Kishore Sharma,J.)