1 FARAD CONSTITUTION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4099/2009 (Purushottam Ramlu Komawar ..vs.. Vasant Rajaram Komawar and others) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM:- B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE:- DECEMBER 03, 2009 Heard. The challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 22/7/2009. Perusal of said order shows that the respondent No.4 Superintendent of Land Records has found that as the matter was pending before higher authority i.e. respondent No.5, he could not have granted any interim relief. In these circumstances, learned Advocate Shri De for petitioner has in the alternative contended that if respondent No.5 is directed to decide the pending Revision before it within reasonable time, the situation can be taken care of. Learned Advocate Shri Bhide for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 states that if no interim orders are being passed, these respondents have no objection to a direction to 2 respondent No.5 to decide the matter in accordance with law. He however, states that those proceedings are not legally maintainable. Learned AGP Shri Khubalkar states that if only direction to decide the matter expeditiously is to be issued, the writ petition must be placed before the appropriate Division Bench. In view of the other prayers made and the fact that the substantive challenge is to the order dated 22/7/2009 as also the order arise out of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, it is clear that the cognizance thereof can be taken by the Single Judge of this court. Keeping the issue of maintainability of Revision as filed before respondent No.5 open, the respondent No.5 is directed to decide the same as early as possible and in any case by 28th February, 2010. With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE Diwale.