^y SS' PETITiONER (insurer) RESPONDENTS (Ciaimar.ts) HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR WriLPetition(22UNa5_172of2Q08 Manager, the Orientat insurance Coropany Limited, Near fo Adarsh Bai Vsdya Mandi', Dhamteri, Tahsil & District Dhamtari (CG). Versus 1. Rupa Bai @ Satrupa Bai Husband Puranik Ram Sahu, age 50ysre. 2.. PuraniR Ram S/o. Pachkaud Sahu, age 60 years. Both the resident of village Purur, Thana & Tahssi - Gurur, Distt. Durg, CG. Driver 3. Kaiiash Kumar Sahu, S/o. Hemu Ram Sahu, Age 26 years, rssident of village Purur, Thana & Tahsii - Gyrur, Distt. Duig (CG). Owner 4. Hemu Ram Sahu, S/o. Ram Prasad Sahu, age 50 years, reskient Purur, Thana & Tahsil - Gurur, Distt. Durg, CG. (Writ Petition under Articie 227 of the Constitutfon of India) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Mr. Sudhir Agrawai, counsel tor the petifener, ORAL ORDER (Passedon th.'s 22nd dayofSeptember, 2008} Learned counsel appearing for ttie petitioner submits that by order dated 25-2-2008 (Annexure P/1) passed by the Additional Motor Accident Ciaims Tribunat (FTC), Dhamtari, the award of sum of Rs.2000/- granted to the respondents on aecount of injury is bad in iaw, ih view of the fact that the vehicie i.e., Maruti Van No. CG 17-C/0403) involved in the accident was insured for personal use. The said vehicle was used for commercial purpose. Thus, the same amounts to breach of policy. 2) At this stage, in view of thefact that a petty amount of Rs.2000/- was jranted to the respondents, it is not necessary to examine the queStlon of iaw h^u Raiu s^ % in this petition. The question of law remains open and may fae chaltenged in the appropriate case. 3) Looking from all angles particularly, the quantum of the amount, this petition is dismissed. Consequently, pending applieations, if any, stand disposed of. f§?^,;^ :^^Sd/-;' ^;1,,^ ] Satjsh^.^Lgnihotri ^ ^,,,.:^:; ;Judge !' .'1 1.,^