(^ 'v^' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR W.P. 10 No. 1757 of 2009 Petitioners 1. 2. 3. Gauesh Ram Yadav, S/o Vishesar Thefhwar, aged about 35 years. Indram., S/o Gopal Rawat, ageil about 40 years. Devkuinari, D/o J^aiuiafh, aged about 35 years. AU above R/o Vfflage Semariya, Tahsfl Palari, District Raipur (CG) Versus Respondents 1. State of CIihatdsgarh fhrough CtiUector, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) Sub- Divisional OfiBcer (Revenue), Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (CG) Executi.ve Engirieer, Public Works Department, Division No.2, Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (CG) 2. 3. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OPTHE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnih.otri J.) Shri Maaoj Paranjpe, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Shashank Thakur, Paael Lawyer for the respondents. 2. (Passed on this 23rd Day ofApril, 2009) Leam.ed counsel appearing for the petitioner subinits that on 15.11.2006 fhe petitioners have prcferred au application under Section 18 of the Land Acquisitiou Act against the award dated 10.7.2006, which was referred to the Additional CoUector, Baloda Bazar, Distnct Raipur by order dated 18.2.2008 (Annexure P/6). Siace the appUcation dated 15.11.2006 is pending consideration and the same is not being decided expeditiously, fb.e petitioners would suffer irreparable injury as after acquisition of land the petitioners are entitled to proper compensation, as early as possible. Shri Shashaak Thakur, leamed Pauel Lawyer appearing for the respondents/State would submit fhat fhe pending appUcation -'^ •i- .«/ 5. Thnkur dated 15.11.2006 (Aiuiexure P/6) shaU be considered and decided by the concemed authorily, iu accordance wifh law, on its owii inerits, within a period of8 weeks fixiin tbe date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. lu view of the foregoing, accordiag to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners, nofhiug survives for adjudication. In view of fhe above, this petition staiids disposed of. No order asto costs. - satis(l K^^otri 'ge