IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45286 of 2009 SUNAINA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04 15.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned counsel for informant as well as learned P.P. for the State. Admittedly, petitioner is mother-in-law of deceased whose marriage had taken place in the year 2003 and subsequently she died in mysterious circumstance on 07.06.2009. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the parties have compromised this case and, as a matter of fact, deceased died on account of ailment. The aforesaid submission is seconded by learned counsel for the informant. Considering this aspect of the matter that the husband of the petitioner had already been granted regular bail and the informant has demolished the prosecution case, I think it proper to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to petitioner. Accordingly, petitioner, namely, Sunaina Devi, in the event of his arrest/surrender within thirty days from the date of communication of this order to the concerned court in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 140 of 2009, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Saran (Chapra) subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)