THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.25898 OF 1995 ORAL ORDER: Mrs . Krishenaveni, Advocate, representing Sri M. Chandrasekhara Rao, the learned counsel for petitioners, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive, and therefore, no further adjudication is necessary. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs ______________ (G. ROHINI, J.) 17th January, 2007. Kgr THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.25898 OF 1995 17th January, 2007. Between: T. Pratap Reddy and others. .. Petitioners. And Government of A.P., represented by its Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and another. .. Respondents.