1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4070 OF 2010 Rekha w/o Devidas Patil, Age : 36 years, Occu. Service, R/o at Dhule, Dist. Dhule ..PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra (in the Department of Sports and Youth Service Mantralaya Mumbai - 32) 2. Director, Sport and Youth Services, Pune, Dist. Pune ..RESPONDENTS Mrs S.T. Kazi, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr K.G. Patil, A.G.P. for the respondents. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ DATE : 4th May, 2010 ORAL JUDGMENT [ PER GANGAPURWALA , J ] Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties the petition is taken up for final hearing at the stage of admission. 2 2. By the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks direction against respondent no.2 to take a decision on the complaint submitted by the petitioner on 8.10.2007. 3. It is stated by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that in pursuance to the complaint against the District Sports Officer Inquiry Committee was constituted and a report has also been submitted to the respondent no.2 but the respondent no.2 has not taken any decision on the same. 4. In view of the limited relief claimed, we direct respondent no.2 to take a final decision on the complaint submitted by the petitioner, if not already decided, within a period of three months from today, in accordance with law and on its own merits and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioner. 5. Rule is made absolute on the above terms with no order as to costs. ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) ( P.V.HARDAS ) JUDGE JUDGE amj/wp4070.10