SBCMA No.2545/07 .Devi Lal Vs. Shyam Lal & Anr. -{1}- SBCMA No.2545/07 Devi Lal Vs. Shyam Lal & Anr. DATE OF ORDER : - 12.9.2008 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. Sandeep Saruparia, for the appellant. Mr. Deepak Menariya ] Mr. Mukul Singhvi ], for the respondents. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. The appellant is aggrieved against the award dated 5th Jan, 2007 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Udaipur. Vide award dated 5.1.2007, according to learned counsel for the appellant, the tribunal has not considered the disability certificate Ex.11 while assessing the compensation for payment. It is also submitted that the medical certificate clearly shows that the appellant suffered 10% disability. I considered the submissions of learned counsel for SBCMA No.2545/07 .Devi Lal Vs. Shyam Lal & Anr. -{2}- the parties and perused the record as well as the disability certificate Ex.11. Ex.11 has been considered by the tribunal while deciding the loss caused to the appellant due to the accident with reference to the disability certificate Ex.11. Un-disputedly, the appellant suffered one fracture in the leg and looking to his working which he is doing and looking to the total quantum awarded to the appellant amounting to Rs.23,000/-, I do not find that the tribunal has committed any error in awarding the compensation or the compensation is low one. In view of the above, there is no merit in this appeal and the same is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-