Crl. Misc. No. M-35732 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-35732 of 2011 Date of Decision : November 30, 2011 Barjinder Singh .... Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. S. P. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Accused Barjinder Singh has filed this petition for anticipatory bail in case FIR No.162 dated 14.09.2011, under Sections 307, 326, 452, 324, 323, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code (in short – IPC) (Sections 307 and 326 IPC deleted later on), registered at Police Station Guruharsahai, District Ferozepur. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the case file. Earlier petition for anticipatory bail moved by the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 04.10.2011 (Annexure P-3) Crl. Misc. No. M-35732 of 2011 2 when counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, sought to withdraw the said petition. Counsel for the petitioner contended that instant second petition has been moved because offences under Section 307 and 326 IPC have since been dropped by the prosecution. However, counsel for the petitioner is unable to tell as to whether the said offences were dropped after or prior to passing of order Annexure P-3. Moreover, admittedly, the injured suffered fracture of tibia with sharp weapon, which is attributed to the present petitioner. The same would come within the purview of Section 326 IPC. There is nothing on record to substantiate the contention of counsel for the petitioner that the said injury was self-suffered. Dismissed, without meaning to express any opinion on merits of the case. November 30, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE