1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Miscellaneous Civil Application (Review) No. 288/2008 (Navnath Kashinath Pawar VERSUS Hon'ble Secretary, Shri Vasant Naik Education Society & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.S. Saoji h/f Shri Anand Parchure, counsel for the applicant. Shri F.T. Mirza, counsel for the R-1 & 2. Shri Y.B. Mandpe, Assistant Government Pleader for the R-4. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 4, 2009. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By the present application, the applicant seeks a review of the judgment dated 23.06.2004 in Writ Petition No.1801/1991. It is the case of the applicant that the respondent management had received the arrears payable to the petitioner for having worked on the post of Headmaster but, the same were not paid to the petitioner by the management. Shri Mandpe, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions from 2 respondent no.4, makes a statement that the respondent no.4 had not paid the arrears according to the scales payable under the 4th and the 5th Pay Commission, to the management. It appears from the reading of the judgment dated 23.06.2004 that the petitioner had restricted his claim in Writ Petition No.1801/1991 only in so far as the recovery was concerned. This Court had quashed and set aside the orders seeking recovery dated 02.01.1986 and 09.07.1991. Rule was made absolute by this Court only to that effect. No ground has been made out for reviewing the judgment passed by this Court on 23.06.2004 in Writ Petition No.18.01.1991. The review application is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE APTE