IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12749 of 2009 UMESH PANDIT & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 19-May-09 Heard the parties. It has been submitted that petitioner No.1, Umesh Pandit has been taken into custody. In that view of the matter, his prayer for anticipatory bail is dismissed as infructuous. From the impugned order it appears that after investigation the case under Section 304B has been found true by the police. Considering the relationship and responsibility of petitioners No.2 and 3 as senior members of the family being father-in-law and mother-in-law of the victim, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. This order shall not prejudice their case if they surrender and seek regular bail on all the grounds available to them. Considering that petitioner No.4 is a junior member being Devar and petitioner No.5 is a married Nanad of the victim lady, their prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks, let petitioners No.4, Kameshwar Pandit and 5, Meena Devi be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, 2 Muzaffarpur in Shiwaipatti P.S. Case No.85 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ.)