IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1019 of 2008 1. Rajeshwar Prasad son of Mohan Sah, resident of village Jamunia, Barai Tola, P.O. Ahwar Sheikh, P.S.Nautan, District. West Champaran. 2. Hira Sah son of Mohan Sah, resident of village Jamunia, Barai Tola, P.O. Ahwar Sheikh, P.S.Nautan, District. West Champaran. ..Appellants Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Agriculture and Land Reforms. Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Consolidation, Bihar,Patna. 4. The Deputy Director, Consolidation, West Champaran, Bettiah 5. The Consolidation Officer, Nautan, District West Champaran, Bettiah. 6. Deepak Kumar, son of Awadhesh Prasad Verma, resident of Mohalla Kila, Ward No.II, through his father (natural guardian) P.O. & P.S. Bettiah, District West Champaran. .. …. Respondents. ----------- For Appellants : Mr.Y.V.Giri, Senior Advocate Mr.V.R.Bharti, Advocate. For the State : Mr.Shashi Bhushan Kumar, SC 7 (Resp.No.1 to 5) ------ 8 19.09.2011 Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the averments made in the limitation petition (I.A.No.7672 of 2008), the delay in filing of this appeal is condoned. The present appeal has been filed against the order dated 16.09.2008 passed in CWJC No.10397 of 2001 wherein the appellants have chosen to question the order passed by the Director, Consolidation as contained in Annexure-1. However, as disputed question of facts are involved in the writ petition with regard to purchase of land by the appellants by virtue of sale deed dated 4.5.1983 on the face of another sale deed executed by one Satyadeo Prasad, we are of the opinion that this Court is not inclined to delve on the disputed question of fact. But, however, in 2 view of the fact that the disputed facts have to be agitated before an appropriate forum, the learned counsel for the appellants sought liberty of the Court available to him under law. The learned counsel for the appellants sought liberty of this Court to avail the remedy available to him under law before the appropriate forum, accordingly, such liberty is granted. With the aforesaid observation this appeal stands disposed of. Chandran (T. Meena Kumari, J.) (Vikash Jain, J.)