IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3487 of 2009 Lokesh Kumar . Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors . ----------- 3/ 14/07/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. After some argument learned counsel for the petitioner moulds the prayer to submit that considering his past services as a daily-wager, if the respondents propose to advertise and make regular appointments on the post of Amin and if he applies, they should consider his case in accordance with law by due age relaxation and weightage for his past work experience. The Court finds the prayer to be reasonable and expects the respondents to consider the same appropriately. The second contention is that the petitioner has worked on daily-wages which has not been paid in full for appropriately 180 days. Learned counsel for the State from the counter affidavit contended that the petitioner has not worked after 25.12.2000. Whether the petitioner has worked or not is primarily a question of fact. If the petitioner represents and satisfies the respondents that he has worked for certain periods for which daily-wages have not been 2 paid, it is expected that the respondents shall consider his grievances and if any arrears are found payable, the same shall be paid to the petitioner. Let the second part of this order be complied with within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt/production of submission of such representation by the petitioner along with a copy the present order. The writ application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)