IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8409 of 2011 S. Imteyaz Hassan & Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr ----------- 2/ 15th Sept 2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the O.P. No.2 as well as learned APP. Petitioner has prayed for quashing of order dated 21.08.2010 passed by SDJM, Gaya in Complaint Case No. 395 of 2010, Trial No. 173/2010 (Tarannum Nehal Vs. S. Imteyaz Hassan) whereby and whereunder petitioners have been summoned to face trial for an offence punishable under Section 498A IPC, ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. O.P. No.2 filed Complaint Case No. 395/2010 against the petitioners including others (not summoned) putting a narration of her woe which she met at her Sasural after having solemnization of marriage with S. Imetyaz Hassan on 31st March 2008 according to Hanafi Sect of Muslim Law. Fortunately, by the grace of God, the parties have entered into compromise and in token thereof so 2 many case having in between the parties got disposed of in terms thereof. Before this Court also learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the O.P.No.2 endorsed the same. In a decision reported in 2011 (3) PLJR 323 similar situation has been brought before the Bench wherein the order of cognizance was quashed in terms of compromise. Therefore, the order impugned is quashed. Consequent thereupon, the instant petition is allowed. perwez (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)