IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 316 of 2011 Smt. Narmada Devi and another. … Petitioners. Versus Smt. Shakuntla Devi W/O Late Sri Joot Singh Ranawat. … Respondent. Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioners. Date February 23, 2011. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ petition has been preferred for a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Dehradun to expedite the disposal of O.S. No. 46 of 2009 Smt. Shakuntala Devi Vs. Smt. Narmada Devi and another pending in that court within a time bound period. O.S. No. 46 of 2009 for a decree of permanent injunction has been filed against the petitioners, who filed their written statement and also filed objection against the temporary injunction application. The grievance of the petitioners is that the application for temporary injunction has not yet been disposed of finally on merits, though the plaintiff had obtained an ex parte temporary injunction. Learned counsel for the petitioners in the course of arguments has urged that the ends of justice would be served if a direction is issued to the court concerned to decide the suit as well as the application for temporary injunction on merits within a time bound period. Prayer is innocuous. The Civil Judge (Junior Division) Dehradun is directed to decide the aforesaid suit, pending in that court, on merits expeditiously as far as possible. It is further directed that in case the temporary injunction application (paper no. 6-C2) of the plaintiff-respondent has not yet been disposed of finally on merits, the same shall be disposed of expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. All pending applications stand disposed of. (B.S.Verma, J.) RCP