THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5463 of 2010 September 16, 2011 Between: Smt. Manthina Rajeswari, W/o. Satyanarayana Murthy ... Petitioner And Gadhula Nageswara Rao, S/o. Nooka Raju And another ...Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5463 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.1219 of 2005 on the file of the Court of I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada. She filed the suit against the first respondent alleging that he is trying to interfere with her peaceful possession of ‘C D E F’ portion of plaint plan, which forms part of 40’ wide panchayat road. In the said suit, she filed I.A.No.273 of 2010 under Order I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to implead the second respondent as a party defendant. The same was dismissed by the Court below by impugned order dated 21.10.2010. In this civil revision petition, the Counsel for the petitioner vehemently contends that under Section 53 of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 all the public passages and roads shall vest in the Gram Panchayat and, therefore, when there is a threat of encroachment or impediment to the use of public road, the Gram Panchayat has to take necessary action. According to the Counsel, the Gram Panchayat is proper and necessary party to the suit. Admittedly, the dispute is between the petitioner and the first respondent. The petitioner alleges that the first respondent is trying to interfere with her peaceful passage of ‘C D E F’ portion of plaint plan which is part of 40’ wide road. There is no allegation made nor any relief is pleaded against the Gram panchayat. Therefore, this Court does not find any error in the order passed by the Court below. The civil revision petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. _________________ (V.V.S. RAO, J) September 16, 2011 YS