WP(C) 3947/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTIC B P KATAKEY Heard Mr AR Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitoners and Mrs HM Phukan, learne d state counsel appearing for the respondent nos.1, 2 and 3. The grievance raised in the present petition is that the Deputy Commissi oner(DC), Lakhimpur, in the list of beneficiaries entitled to receive compensati on pursuant to the scheme prepared by the Government of Assam, has included the names of the respondent nos.5 to 35, though they are not entitled to be. The pet itioner, therefore, has prayed for setting aside such list in so far as those pr ivate respondents are concerned and also for a direction to the respondents to e xtend the benefit of such scheme to the deserving beneficiaries only. Though the petitioners claimed that the respondent nos.5 to 35 are not e ntitled to the benefit and their names were wrongly included in the list prepare d by the Deputy Commissioner, they are yet to approach the DC for ventilating th eir grievances. That being the position, the present writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the Deputy Commissioner, Lakhimpur for v entilating their grievances by way of a representation which, if filed, shall de finitely be considered and disposed of by the said authority within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of the same. Needless to say, while disposing o f such representation, all the interested parties, including the present private respondent nos.5 to 35 shall be heard. The petitioners shall produce the certified copy of this order before th e Deputy Commissioner, Lakhimpur along with the representation to be filed. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.