IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-38162 of 2010 Date of decision : 19.4.2011 Sandeep @ Mann …. Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …. Respondent Present: Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. T.S. Salana, DAG, Punjab. *** S.S. SARON, J. Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered against him on 4.4.2010 for the offence under Sections 307, 324, 506, 427, 148 and 149 IPC. In the incident that occurred on 3.4.2010 at 2.30 p.m., it has been alleged by the complainant Ramandeep @ Raman Kumar that on 3.4.2010 at about 12 noon, he had come from his village Dhanal Kalan to village Khurla Kingra on his motorcycle for getting a hair cut. At about 2.30 p.m. he was returning to his village after getting a hair cut and on the way when he happened to reach Dharampura Abadi of village Khambra, at that time one white colour Maruti car came from behind which was brought parallel to the motorcycle of the complainant. The occupant of the Maruti car opened the window of the car and tried to hit the same in the motorcycle of the complainant. Out of fear, the complainant speeded up his motorcycle but the driver of the said Maruti car followed him. When the complainant reached near the turning of village Nangal Purdil and slowed down his motorcycle, the driver of the Maruti CRM No. M-38162 of 2010 [2] car hit his car in the motorcycle, as a result of which the complainant fell down from the motorcycle. In the meanwhile, the petitioner Sandeep @ Mann along with two un-identified persons all armed with ‘datar’ got down from the car. One of the accused namely Hans Raj @ Kaku raised a lalkara exhorting his co-accused not to spare the complainant and then all the accused including the petitioner caused injuries to the complainant. The petitioner gave a ‘datar’ blow on the head of the complainant Ramandeep @ Raman Kumar. As per the medical-report (Annexure P2), the complainant Ramandeep @ Raman Kumar received as many as 10 injuries. Injury No.7 is an incised wound over midline in the middle of parietal area of skull and injury No.8 is an incised wound on left parietal area of skull 5 cm behind injury No.7. X-ray of the skull was advised. As per the X-ray report (Annexure P3), there is no fracture seen in the X-ray of skull. The Orthopaedic opinion has been given to the effect that injuries No.1, 2 and 4 were declared grievous. The injury attributed to the petitioner is not stated to be grievous. The petitioner was arrested on 16.10.2010 and since then he is in custody. Ramandeep @ Raman Kumar has since been discharged from the hospital. It is submitted that a compromise has also been reduced into writing on 2.2.2011 between Sandeep @ Mann (petitioner), Gurmeet Ram @ Sonu and Hans Raj @ Kaku from the one side and Ramandeep @ Raman Kumar, complainant on the other side. In the facts and circumstances, the Crl. Misc. petition is allowed and the petitioner on his furnishing personal bond and surety to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalandhar shall be admitted to bail. (S.S. SARON) April 19, 2011 JUDGE amit