HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI. MADAN B.LOKUR AND HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED WRIT APPEAL NO.526 OF 2010 16th November, 2011. Between: THALLA SANJEEVA REDDY .. APPELLANT AND STATE OF A.P. REP. BY ITS SECRETARY(REV) REVENUE DEPT.,SECRETARIAT HYDERABAD AND OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI. MADAN B.LOKUR AND HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED WRIT APPEAL NO.526 OF 2010 O R D E R: (PER HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI Madan B.Lokur) The appellant is aggrieved by order dated 29.3.2010 passed by the learned single Judge in W.P.No.6933 of 2010. 2. The appellant claims to be the owner of land admeasuring Ac.4.29 guntas in Sy.No.299 situate of Pudur Village, Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The appellant entered into an agreement of sale with 5th respondent- M/s.Narne Estates Private Limited and also executed a General Power of Attorney in favour of the vendee. 3. It appears that M/s.Narne Estates Private Limited then sold the property to M/s.Srikul Estates Private Limited. 4. On the basis of the above, M/s.Srikul Estates Private Limited moved an application for mutation of the land in its favour. The mutation was granted and thereafter the appellant moved an application for recalling the order of mutation on the ground that it was not given a hearing in the case. The application was allowed by the primary authority against which an appeal was filed and that appeal was allowed on the ground that the primary authority did not have competence or jurisdiction to recall the order of mutation once it was passed. A revision petition was then filed by the appellant but that was rejected. 5. Feeling aggrieved by the consequent upholding of the mutation, the appellant preferred a writ petition which came to be dismissed by the learned single Judge resulting in this appeal. 6. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the entire transaction which resulted in mutation was a fraud inasmuch as the General Power of Attorney granted in favour of M/s. Narne Estates Private Limited had been cancelled. 7. Learned single Judge noted, and this is confirmed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of M/s.Srikul Estates Private Limited, that the appellant had preferred a civil suit being O.S.No.490 of 2006 before the II Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District for cancellation of the sale deed and consequential permanent injunction. The appellant had made both M/s. Srikul Estates Private Limited and M/s.Narne Estates Private Limited as parties to the civil suit. 8. We are further told by learned counsel for 5th respondent- M/s.Srikul Estates Private Limited that the suit was dismissed by a judgment and decree dated 1.12.2010 and the appellant has preferred an appeal in the matter. 9. Under these circumstances, we are of the view that since the appellant has already taken recourse to proceedings before a civil Court, the learned single Judge committed no error in rejecting the writ petition. 10. There is no merit in the writ appeal. 11. Dismissed along with interlocutory applications. ( MADAN B.LOKUR, CJ ) 16th November, 2011. ( GHULAM MOHAMMED, J ) Nagesh Babu HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI. MADAN B.LOKUR AND HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED WRIT APPEAL NO.526 OF 2010 O R D E R: (PER HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B.LOKUR) 16TH November, 2011.