IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5121 of 2009 BILAT JHA Versus BIHAR STATE WARE HOUSING CORPORATION & ANR. ----------- 2/ 23/04/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent Corporation. The prayer in the application is for direction to the respondents to consider the issue of enhancement of the age of retirement from 58 to 60 years and grant benefit of the same to the petitioner. Reliance is placed on an order of this Court in C.W.J.C. No.8670/08 wherein a similar issue has been decided. The basic foundation to invoke the writ jurisdiction is demand and refusal of relief. Recital in pargraph-10 in support of the claim of having moved the respondents is extremely vague and non-speaking when no copy of representation has been annexed. It appears that the petitioner wants to confront the respondents fully loaded and armed with the Court’s order. It is for the respondents to decide what is the effect of the order in C.W.J.C. No.8670/08 and whether it be applicable to the petitioners also or not. The writ application stands disposed. KC (Navin Sinha, J.)