FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD PIL NO. 78 OF 2011 "Shivaji Ganpat Darandale and another Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. B.R. Warma, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.K. Tambe, AGP for respondents. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 12TH OCTOBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] The prayer sought in the present petition is exclusively within the domain of the executive. While establishing the office of the Registrar, the State is required to take into consideration various factors like suitability of the place, availability of infrastructure, availability of funds etc. 2] We are, therefore, not inclined to entertain the present petition. The same is rejected. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to pursue the matter with the respondent No. 1, and if such a demand is made by the present petitioners, the dismissal of the present petition, would not come in their way. [M.T. JOSHI,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-