1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.10.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.1283 and 1284 of 2011 and MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.1 of 2011 Dhandapani .. Petitioner in both C.R.Ps. Vs. 1.Bommaya Raju Subbaiyan (died) Muthuraj (died) 2.Vanaja 3.Ramesh 4.Jegannathan 5.Mallika @ Mallammal 6.Pugalendhi 7.Vasudevan 8.Kala 9.A.Angamuthu 10.Subramani 11.Annadurai @ Mallayan 12.Ravichandran .. Respondents in both C.R.Ps. Civil Revision Petitions have been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the petition and orders dated 27.06.2011 passed in unnumbered Interlocutory Application Nos.- of 2011 in Original Suit No.219 of 1996 by the Principal Sub Court, Karur. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramesh in both C.R.Ps. For Respondents : Mr.S.Anand Chandrasekar 1,11 and 12 in for M/s.Sarvabhauman both C.R.Ps. Associates. COMMON ORDER These Civil Revision Petitions have been preferred against the orders of return dated 27.06.2011 passed in unnumbered Interlocutory Application Nos.- of 2011 filed in Original Suit No.219 of 1996 by the Principal Sub Court, Karur. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2. The revision petitioner herein as plaintiff has filed Original Suit No.219 of 1996 on the file of the Court below for the reliefs of partition and separate possession of his share, wherein the present respondents have been shown as defendants. In Original Suit No.219 of 1996, the first defendant therein has been examined as D.W.1 and he filed a will dated 10.08.1966 alleged to have been executed by his father viz., Macha Naicker and in order to compare the signature found therein with the admitted signature of the executant, these petitions have been filed for the purpose of reopening the case on the side of the petitioner/plaintiff and also for the purpose of sending the will dated 10.08.1966 to Forensic Science Department. The Court below has returned both the petitions stating as to how these petitions are maintainable at this stage. Against the orders of return passed by the Court below, these Civil Revision Petitions have been preferred. 3. Considering the fact that in both the petitions, the Court below has not passed any final orders and also considering that these petitions have been filed so as to reopen Original Suit No.219 of 1996 on the side of the petitioner/plaintiff and also to send the will dated 10.08.1966 to Forensic Science Department, the petitioner is entitled to file these petitions and therefore the revision petitioner/ petitioner can be directed to represent the petitions in question. 4. In fine, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed without costs and the revision petitioner/petitioner/plaintiff is directed to represent the petitions in question before the Court below and the Court below is directed to number the petitions in question, if it is in order and also dispose on merits as early as possible. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.Side) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The Principal Sub Court, Karur. +1cc to Mr.V.Ragavachari, Advocate Sr.No.36347 +1cc to Mr.Sarvabhuman Associates, Advocate Sr.No.36262 smn ssk/08.11.2011 /4c-2p/- COMMON ORDER MADE IN C.R.P(NPD)(MD)Nos.1283 and 1284 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 19.10.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/