c^ ^OTSZ- ssp^^ FMf^ ^^l^llt BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P fS) No. ^8 /2010 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS ^^ :1 Ishwar Prasad Patel, S/o. Late Shri Chandrapal Patel, aged about 40 years, Caste-Aghariya, Waterman, Govt. Middle School Jharana, Block Development- Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.) 2. Lakeshwar Dansena, S/o.Damodar Dansena, aged about 38 years, Peon, Govt. Middle School, Darri, Block Development-Kharsiya, District Raigarh VERSUS :1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) ,.^ .A.C- ^ay ^y /'^w .^v^' -€/: V ^ 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 3.' The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Kharsiya, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. XI-HC—78 W^fT^ W\^ ^n-sn^T^HbF ^ /- *ii*i^r ^»<irai ^5)' •<ii^i<n^, y1iil'Hli<o, [®tdiy^< ^^^^..^.•...^^/..t 200 3;TI^TT?^ ((^1^4^) WTOT 1Rf^T 3TT^T S.B-.HON'BLEJUSTJCEjVSR.PRST 01-09-2010: Shri Ramakant Pandey, coun^ei Smt. Smitha Ghai, PL forthe ^ei for the petitloners. pltate/respondents. Grievances of the petltioner^ reguiar pay scale by the respondent^ Counsel for the petitioners petitioners (Annexure P-4) Is pendir|g same has not been decided and th^ petitioners are permltted to fiie fresll raising al! their grievances which and in turn the respondents representatlon expeditlously in acco| The petitipn is disposed of eventuaiity of fillng any such respondents raising ail their concerned to decide the same conl of the case as expedltiously as pos^i !t is made cSear that thls C^i merits of the case and the authorityj the representatlon ofthe petltloners| '^TSrf<?Tzft?T TTH:T^f ^* fe^ ipai^K '^ 3fRTH3rTT^T LNKERDIWAKER are that they have not been granted ^ubmlts that the representation of the before the authoritles but tll! date the ends of justice would be served if the representatlon before the respondents been raised in the present petition be directed to decide the said I'dance wlth law. with. the aforesaid dlrection. In the by the petitioners before the >< it.is expected from the authority ^idering all the factual and lega! aspect lible. ^urt has not expressed any opinion on concerned would be at libetly to decide strictiy In accordance wlth law, hfeve mpiy repr^sentation gneva|rices Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge +