IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 704 of 2008 UDAILAL DANGI V/S STATE & ORS. Mr. ANISH AHMED for Mr. VINOD PUROHIT, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 13.8.2008 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI KISHAN SWAROOP CHAUDHARI,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel relied upon Annex.5 to claim the retire age to have been increased from 58 to 60 years, but then a look at Annex.5 shows that thereby amendment was made in Rule 56 of RSR, 1951, and admittedly the appellant's services are governed by Rajasthan Agriculture Produce Market (Market Committee Employees) Service Rules, 1975, and nothing has been shown, as to how the appellant is entitled to the benefit of said Annex.5. In that view of the matter, we do not find any force in the appeal. The same is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( KISHAN SWAROOP CHAUDHARI ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/