\ / .^, ^. 'f /- s s IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIALSPUR cHKATnsfiARH. gjngi^ Bench CivU Revision. No. ~(^ /20Q6. APPLICANTS: ^REVISIONISTS .M «F ....-:^F' ^yr ^^ / ^"' RESPONDENTS: N0N-APPLICANTS ^l. SURESH, S/o Ganesh Sahu, aged about 30 years, residence op Village Sarekha, P.0. Mahudambi, Tahsil Gunderdehi, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ^2. Thagiya Bai, W/o Khilawan Sahu, aged about 30 years, residence ot village Sarekha, Tahsil Gunderdehi, Distorict Durg, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS 1. Harakh Ram, S/o Gend Singh Sinha, aged about 55 years, residence of village Biretara, Tahsil Gunderdehi, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ^.Indal Ram , S/o Prem lal Sinha, aged about 52 years. ^3. Narad, S/o Indal Ram^Sinha, aged about 35 years. ^ / 4.Daan Singh, S/o Indal Ram Sinha, aged about 30 years. 5. Setrain/S/o Indal Rain Sinha, aged about 27 years. ^u^ 6. SmtJuth^Bai, W/o Indal Ram . v' All resident ofvillage Sarekha, Tahsil Gunderdehi, District Durg, Chhattisgrah. CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. XI-HC-78 <TTR^nsh*1|ch 3ST,^(PTR^T, ^rftOT?, tsKni'yy ^^...c.-^. <.€}^. .°* ^[ 200 ^n^T^Tf^ri^ ^[T3TT^T$b^lcti '^IK^ ^M 3T[^5T q^F (^gi^^r) ^Rfr^:^f?cT3^T 19.07.2006 Shri N.S. Dhurandhar, Civil Procedure agaiast tlie o chl^lld41^ HTRoff^fe^t <Rl<'^l< ^^rf^TOT^T Counsel for the appUcants. Heard on admission. This is a petition filed ^inder Section 115 ofthe Code of t-der dated 29/4/2006 passed in Execution Case No. 18 B/200^. It is stated fhat aa d under Order 21 Rule 58 andl the Executiag Court. Leamed counsel for fl somettme, prays for withdraw^l of the petition. The petition is dismissei »bjection taken by Uie Objector 59 of CPC has been rejected by ie appllcaiits, after arguiag for Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge 1 as withdrawn. y^ ''^ ^' P.T.O.