991W 54v @ $1$§€§§£ Qwg’g IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISIGARH AT RILASPUR W.P.(S.1No. QfB 12010 1/. Smt. Madhuri Joshi W / o Dr. Madhav Devidas Joshi, Aged about 65 years, Retired Upper Division Teacher, R/o Joshi Gali, Kotra Road, Raigarh, Tahsil 85 District Raigarh (C.G.) PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1 State of Chhattisgarh Through : The, Secretary, School Education‘ Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Officer, District Education Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Joint Director Treasury Account 8t Pension Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur (63o) 4. Block Education Officer, Block Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE . OF MANDAIVIUS CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. The petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under : f HEG SQURW 91F SHHéTTI$GMQH cm J\ ‘F‘ if WRH PcTf £ gQN :3§ EM? 5&9: U? 2370 PET‘H’R‘3NEFQ‘ $mt. Madhuri Jcxfghi Vers‘w RESPUNDENTé; Séa‘ge 9f Shhatiiwzirh & Qthei’s {Whit PatEtEm’; um‘Eer iigiide 22§ 6F the {:9n3t{:utkm a?” india} Smg§e Bemk : Howbée SW $ati’sh K. Agm‘éwérL J. Preseni :- Shri DP FaiaL S’m’i N N Raw Pah=¢ La‘ww {wthg Sw’é'e—“ftewmqenia GRD‘ER (’QRAL} mwie fw %he graj'tianer. {PaSsad en this 5m d y af Febmas’y, 2Q? ?} The petiéionen whiie warkmg a3 Upper Bivéséen ”mama; ret§reci fmm service an 3W08J’2Q8? am a‘i‘é'ainmg me age 9f wpwannuaimn. The pemiener is aggr§eveti by £he order q’aéaa 24;?)21‘2MC} Q'Anmexm‘e W2), Whereundey a mm a)? Rs‘ 35,22??— has; beem dimmed it; he cieciucieai from the i‘ei‘riai dues: haiciing §t 2c: be amass paymen‘i maiée te he petiie'ener éurEng i’he couyse 0f hér sem‘ce. Acacrdmg o the $aamed caunse? aggeamg fa? i’ne peiimwr: Ehe impugmd {sacv‘éry has been marje wi‘chou? afavam‘ihg a1 ppertumty of hearing to me pe‘i§tieyaéa am‘ fuféhen m? issue 33m whethe? recawsrg of excess payme ’ Caz“? be made Wéthcu‘z ffV-iicwing prinaipIES 0f na‘auj‘aE jusiice i$ m %0f'sgei‘ res inkggra, ihe same has haw $siiiwi hy the Suweme Ccurt in 11%6 rmia'es' Qf Sahiks Riim v. Sfasie m” Haryax’m aand l\')_ giberSY and fLan’he: :fwmveai by ihi$ (3cm in We maiter (sf yiayadgéaer Fiwaxi I .The 8t§§e 9f chhafxésgam & Efmrs2 and iiiaiya $ham<ar Way: y, Smile a? MP. {ixjaw 31519 w’ Céhaégsgam} grand afhgns3 and thea’eafter Thés Cm,“ m RamcbaaQI'a Kwx 1/. Sfaa‘e cf :33 a;t Qfhers" am‘ cihar m ‘ e‘owec: .,m r severe} aecaswna . . ‘ xf p: ccnnectea‘ matiezsf §bsewed a3 uncief : “191% commar? ghre‘ad mmmg mtg) me abava de¢£$§cns of the $ugjreme Cam is “‘15? f6; {ecevery a?” wxcésa paymem‘ of emsiméawances‘ @am are twee S whersin 'ih€= amass gaymem may be recovered, name'w {D exaaw paymwf was made m gccmmt a? mgammmema‘zim or frauté r3 7 : 2&05 (1) Mpm“ 1G5;G;x 2 ‘- Bré €ir > _ {mamwmalrs} ’*‘ 2mg; {3:} {Gm La m 3 (m tha m ‘f me empiayee, m) the empby% had knameéga 221a t§~sa paymem yesehied was in excess, and (iii): ”me ez‘mr was cm W‘Led' wf‘thm a ghoré span 0? ‘iéme m" wrang payment ...... " Leameci counse§ agi-peai'mg ‘fm the Sta‘iefi'espiarideri'is dees mi comm/er: i‘qe subm§ssiws made by ieamed caamsaeé fm' the pe€i§onef am; submiis the}? ihis matter may be éisgwseti 0‘? in me same ierms. k1 View a‘f the ‘?<):'eg0§ng and a3 adm§i§ed by éearmd cwnsei apwaiiag fw ihe pamea fhi$ pe€§i§on §s dispwed m’ in the ierms of tha mder passevj in the nase of Ramvhaiydra Kump‘. £5. the impugned crder daied 241%} £20K? {Aanexwe Pf2§ regamimg recwea'y a? ameam 0’? Ra 35,227i— fmm “the fetyiai dues 9f ihe peiiiisner an aswufa’i {If excesa paymené, i$ h$a’eby quarshea“ Tha pe‘zitioner §$ er‘stiiieci i0 fLm penSiGn-r‘zry benefifai’gs'awéty amaum w§€h¢ui any ciemmimn‘. 5‘? ihe amaun’i ha$ beers {eccvemci the ge‘iiiizme? is.erati&§e¢é i0 me $aid axmm‘a: Mm inieas'east a‘i ime rate of 6% pa amum. However, it s open tr) the ,respméenée i0 ”iake irecauree £0 Ruie 3%} e? ihe Chhaii3sges’h C§3i§3 SeMces {Penséem Ewes, i§7a if 5G advised: 3’“ accordance w§"zh law, e§ier feimwieg basic emeimes of namreg justice. 2t ie fueher made ciear kh‘“: n khe evem befere fecevery 0‘? me aiiegee’ excess eaymer‘st was made; a shew cwee neifce was éseued am} {egEy wee fiied by €‘ne peéétiomer f0 the semeu We caee at" ii'ne getitionee' may“ mi ’ee ireated i0 be cavered hy the c‘ieeEsmn a? We {hurt m Ramchaifdra Kemp? Satish K. Agnihotiwi Judge g): Arum Sd/.