// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Revision Petition No.65/2008 Khemchand S/o Shri Gaurishankar Versus Uada S/o Kanhaiya Lal Date of Order ::: 22.08.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Sanjay Singhal, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The plaintiff-petitioner filed a suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.8,000/- against the defendant-non-petitioner for damages in respect of his so-called malicious prosecution. The trial court as well as the appellate court, both, have dismissed the suit. The second appeal is barred as the valuation of the present case is less than Rs.25,000/-, therefore, the petitioner has preferred this revision petition. I have examined the impugned order passed by both the courts below in the light of submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and, after considering the same, I find that there is concurrent finding of fact // 2 // by both the courts below in the present case, which cannot be interfered with by this Court in revisional jurisdiction. There is no illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error in the impugned order so as to interfere with the same. There is no merit in this revision petition and the same is accordingly dismissed in limine. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//