IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4619 of 2011 Vinod Prasad Poddar, son of late Sukhdeo Poddar, resident of Mohalla – Chamru Godown Lane, Burha Nath Road, P S – Khaligabag, District- Bhagalpur Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary to the Government, Department of Science and Technology, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director, Department of Science and Technology, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bailey Road, Patna. ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Sarvan Kumar. For the BPSC: M/S. Md. Nadim Seraj & Satish Kr. Sinha. For the State : Mr. Binod Kumar, AC to SC 16. ----- 02. 21.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Annexure-4 is the communication made by the BPSC rejecting the application of the petitioner for consideration of appointment on the post of a lecturer in Engineering Colleges of the State of Bihar. Annexure-2 is the advertisement where the terms and conditions including the eligibility have been indicated. For the post of lecturer the minimum qualification required is 60% marks. Admitted position is that petitioner does not have that requisite percentage but he says that it can be compensated by experience because he has a long experience in that capacity as a part time lecturer. The terms and conditions with regard to eligibility are laid down in the advertisement itself. If there is no provision that experience has to be given weightage despite less mark, then the minimum marks laid down will be required to be met. 2 Decision of the BPSC to reject the application of the petitioner and not to call him for interview will not be termed as violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. No case therefore is made out for direction or interference with Annexure-4. Annexure-4 is in consonance with the requirements notified in the advertisement. Writ is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)