HiGH COURT OF CHHAmSSARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition (Si 2017 of 2(X® Petitioner Umesh Prasad Sahu, aged about 51 years, son of Sh" Sonesay Sahu, Assistant Teaoher, GoveFnment Primary Schoo! CertraL Workshop Korba (Tulsi Nagar), Distt. Korba c-r' Versus Respondents 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through Swretary, Department of Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2) The District Educstton Offleer, Distriot Korba 3) The Assistant Commissioner, Trinal; Welfare Deptt Korba, Distt. Korba (CG). (VVrit Petltion under Article 22S ofthe Constttutisn cS India) SB: Hon'bteMr. SaUsh K. Agnihotri, J. Presenfc Shri O.P. Yadav, counse! for the petitioner. Shri Aiok Baxshi, Govt. Advocate for the State. OftAL ORDER (Passed on 7-4-2008) With consait of iearned counsei sppearing for both the parties, the matter is heard finaliy. 2) The petitioner was in'itiaily appointed on 13-1-1981 as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay scale of Rs. 150/- fbr the period of two years. After completion of probatlon, the petitioner was granted regular pay scale of Rs.169-300/-. 3) The question of iaw invoiveci herein asto whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay soaie with effect from the date of initial aiyointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 4) Learned counsel appearing tor the petttioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the faots and question of law Involved in the petition are the same to that of Writ Petitlon (S) No.5976 of 200S (Sushil Tiwari & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others), which was ailowed vide order dated 7-11-2006. Learned counsel further subrait that this petition may be d'isposed of in the same teims. 5) In view of the above-stated submisslon made by iearned counset appearing for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same tenms i.e., the petitioner is entitlec! to regular pay scale with effeot from the date of initiai appointment, subject to verification of the fects. No order asto costs. ^api Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge