1 S.B. Civil writ petition No. 2248/2010 Brijendra Kumar Solanki & Ors. vs State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of Order : 10.3.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. Deelip Kawadia, for the petitioners. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioners' contention is that they have been appointed on the post of Education Extension Officer and no final seniority list has yet been published. The respondents are going to fill up the post of Principal which is promotional post and for that purpose issued order dated 16.10.2009 (Annex.7). The petitioner may have have been appointed on the post of Education Extension Officer and may have their claim for consideration for the post of Principal, but Annex.7 is not the process for promotion departmentally and it is an advertisement issued for giving 6 months' ad hoc appointment on the post of Principal, therefore, if the respondents will decide to give promotion to the post of Principal, they may follow the procedure, but so far as giving appointment in the manner in which it is sought to be given by Annex.7, the petitioners cannot have any grievance. So far as contention of the petitioners' that they have submitted representation to the respondents, then naturally, the same will be considered and decided by the 2 respondents in reasonable time. Therefore, I do not find any reason to entertain the writ petition of the petitioner as there is no merit in the writ petition. Hence, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed. However, decision on the petitioners' representation shall be communicated to the petitioner expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from today. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. cpgoyal/-