IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 917 of 2008 Pradeep Kumar and Others … Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others … Respondents Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No. 3. 2. After due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; the contents of the F.I.R.; statements against the petitioners; and the fact that the F.I.R discloses prima-facie case against the present petitioners, I find that the petitioners are not entitled for any relief which they have sought in the writ petition, as such, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in limine. 4. CLMA No. 7776 of 2008 stands disposed of accordingly. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 12.12.2008 Shiv