IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 5744 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.4.2009 Tule Ram ....Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr.L.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL J **** Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to consider the legal notice served by the petitioner objecting to the recovery of Rs. 2,11,058/- from his death-cum-retirement gratuity on account of alleged excess payment earlier. Considering the prayer to be innocuous, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2 to consider the legal notice dated June 20, 2008, served by the petitioner by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The Civil Writ Petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) 17.4.2009 JUDGE Reema