SSK/916 1 WP/3877.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3877 OF 2011 Sou Shobha Chandrashekhar Jadhav & Anr. ....Petitioners Versus Shri Surendra Bhanudas Chavan ...Respondent Mr. P. S. Dani i/b. Mr. M. S. Topkar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Madhav Jamdar, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 24th August, 2011. P.C.: Mr. Dani and Mr.Jamdar, learned counsel appearing for the respective parties agrees for setting aside of the impugned order and remand the matter back to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati Sub- Division, Baramati with liberty to the respondent to make an application for condonation of delay. In view of the concession, reasons need not be given for quashing the impugned order. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of by passing the following order : 1. The impugned order dated 10th January, 2011 condoning the delay in RTS Appeal No.90 of 2010 is quashed and set- aside, and the matter is remanded back to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati Sub-Division, Baramati. SSK/916 2 WP/3877.11 2. The respondent is at liberty to file an application for condonation of delay occurred in filing RTS Appeal No.90 of 2010. In the event, such an application is filed within a period of three weeks from today, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati Sub-Division, Baramati, shall decide the same after hearing both the sides as expeditiously as possible and, in any case, within a period of two months from the date of filing thereof. 3. All the points and contentions of the respective parties are expressly kept open to be agitated before the appellate authority. (RANJIT MORE, J.)