M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS§ARH AT BILASPUR wms) Na. 3213 of 2mg Pe‘ri‘rianer Ji+endm Kumm" Prnmd, S/n. Shri Ishwar Prasad, aged abour 47 years, presently posted and working as In-charge Black Educa‘fion Officer Tammr, Districf Rcigarh ((26,). Versus Respandem-s 1. Sfa'fe of Chha‘hisgarh, Thraugh The Secrefcr'y, SC/ST Deveiopmem Deparfmenf, D.K.$. Building, Monfmlaya, Raipur, Chhaffisgarh Depufy Secre‘rar'y, SC/ST Developmenf Deparfmen'r D.K.5. Building, Manfmiaya, Raipur Chhaf‘tisgarh ' Commissioner, C/ST Déveiopmenf Depar’i’menf 0K5. Buiiding, Monmiaya. Roipur; Chhamsgorh The Assn Commissioner T/W.D. Tribal Welfare Depar'hnen'l' Rnignrh, Chhaftisgarh. WRIT PETITIOg UNDER ARTICLE 226 W TH§ CEéTITm‘Igg OF 1&DIA $8: Han'bie Mr. Jusfice Salish KY Agniho‘l'ri. J Shri B. D. Guru, Advoca're for the pefifioner. ShPi Yashwuvri Singh Thakur, bepufy Advam'l'z General for iha responden'rs. ORAL ORDER (puma on fins 26*“ day of June, zoos) 1. The nefi'fianer has filed 'l'his pe‘l’i'tion being aggrieved by 'lhe irmsfer order da'fed 20.6.2008 (Annexur'e P11), whereby ‘H-ie pefi+ibner, who was wnrking as Incbarge Black Eduaa'l'ian Officer, Tamnar, District \e\ , , S \ Ni «"1- Rnigarh has haefi msfarrad as Lecturer, Govt éiFls Higher .Seaandary School, Dhamixjnignrh, Dis‘tricf Rnigarh. Learned counsel appearirig far ‘H'Ie pe‘fi'tionar submifs *ha'f The pafi'tionar was appoin'fad as Inchargz Block Educafian Officer. Tamnar vide arder dai'ed 30.7.2007 (Annexure P/4). Thereafter, hy ‘H1e impugned arder da'red 20.6.2908 (Annexure P/l) wi'rhin a Show? span fhe pe‘ri‘l'ioner has been fmnsferred as Lecfurer in 60W. GMs Higher Secondary $dmoi,‘ Dharmjaigarh, Dis'h‘ic‘t Raigarh. Learned 'caungi appearing for 1'he pe1'i1‘ioner fur1'her submi'rs tha'l’ fhe fransfer has been dane in an arbi‘rrary marmer wi'l'h malafide in'I'en'fian, an fl'he graund 'Hmi' fhe pefifianer has beer. fransferred wi'rhin a periad of ane year. The +ransfer af an emplayee wifhin a period af one year parficularly +9 his ariginai pas? canna't be held as arbitrary or malafide. The avermen‘l' af learned counsel for The pefi'naner fa fha‘!’ effect deserves fa be rejected as na. case has been made au‘t 'to estabiish \ the malafide and arbitrariness. It is a simple order appears ‘to be with good purpose to send the teacher to a sehooi for teaching, na‘t 'to do the administrative work. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, perused the pleadings and documents appended thereto, it is not a case which warrants interference with the transfer order. The petitioner is basically a teacher working as Lecturer in Mathematics. The petitioner was sent as Incharge Block Education Officer, Tamnar to \ \ \. ”34 look after #12 adminis+m+ive work. The pefifioner as Lecturer has adminis‘fmfiva exigenty. +ransfer ordar no‘t heihg in confarmiiy wi'l'h 1412 rules and raguia+ions None af fhg above grounds are availabie m #12 pe‘fifa'orler. . In view of +512 foregoing, fhis peti'rinn is dismissed, summariiy. Na Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge order as 1‘0 cos-rs. a, J. f':tr«,. ,V . A,.3 I