IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 939 of 2011 Date of decision : 26.04.2011 Ranjit Singh ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Nemo for the petitioner. Mr. Palwinder Singh, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Tejinder Pal Singh, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. N.K. Verma, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned counsel for respondent No.4 stated that since Lachhman Singh son of Dalip Singh (respondent No.4) has expired, so the instant writ petition has become infructuous. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of, as having become infructuous on account of death of respondent No.4 April 26, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge