AB 185/2011 BEFORE HON\BLE MR JUSTICE B D AGARWAL Both the applications are being disposed of by this common order. Heard Mr. DP Chaliha, learned senior counsel for the accused petitioners and Mr. B S Sinha, leanred Addl.P.P. for the State.Also perused the case diary. The petitioners are husband and sister of the prosecutrix. The allegation agains t them are that within one year of the marriage, they demanded dowry. At the sam e time, there is another allegation that the husband was found maintaining illic it relationship with his sister-in-law and when it was protested, the petitioner s poured kerosene on her person and burnt her. The fact of sustaining burn injury by the prosecutrix has not been denied. It is the case of the petitioners that it was accidental fire. However, sketch map d oes not support the theory of accidental fire.Be that as it may, independent wit ness have also stated that after one month of the accident , when they went to p ut back the informant in her in-laws house they were presented and rebukes. These facts also ruled out the theory of accidental fire and the claims of the p etitioner about cordial marital relation . Hence, it is not a fit case wherein anticipatory bail can be granted. Accordingly, prayer for pre-arrest bails are rejected. Interim protection granted on 21.01.2011 is hereby withdrawn. Bail applications stands disposed of.