IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33661 of 2011 Guddu Kumar Son of Late Janardan Singh, resident of Village- Bandopur, Police Station- Karpi, District- Arwal -----------------Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ----------- Opposite Party ---------------------------- 2. 30.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. for the State The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Karpi P.S. Case No. 11 of 2010 for alleged offence under Section 304 (B) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR was lodged against the petitioner and his other family members by his father-in-law alleging that his daughter who was married about 9 months back to the petitioner was done to death by administering poison in her food. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in fact petitioner himself filed FIR in this connection alleging the incident to his family dispute. Learned A.P.P. submits that FIR lodged by the petitioner was untenable since it cannot be said by any stretch of imagination that if there was any dispute for partition between the brothers the wife would be killed. Further, if there was difference between the brothers then the sister-in-law and the brother could not 2 have gone to ask for dowry without the petitioner which is admitted in the FIR lodged by the petitioner himself. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. Anand Kr. ( Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)