^ 4. ^ f /^T- IM ^IWIll IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) W.P. S. N0. ^ 8'^-l /2010 PETITONER RESPONDNETS VERSUS 1. .^^ ^' ^^/' s^y ^ Ramprasad Ratre aged about 41 years, S/o- Prem Lal Ratre, R/o- Village- Navagaon, Post- Aamandula, Tahsil- Malkharoda, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), Ex- ITI Apprentice (Electrician), ^South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Church Colliery, District- Korea (C.G.) Coal India Ltd. 10. Netaji Subhash Raod, Kolkata (W.B.) through its Chairman. Chairman-cum-Managing Director, S.E.C.L. Head Quarter, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) Director (Personal), South Eastern Coal fields Ltd. Seepat Raod Bilaspur (C.G) Dy. Chief Personal Manager (Labour), South Eastern Coalfields Ltd., Bilaspur (C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION 1^> ..'•' .••' y*l )°\^^ ^ ^..•^.••\^><' ko/>^^7 ^-6^^ 2. 3. 4. ^^^^ —78 33n^i ^T'f^tN? ?y8TT ^^ 9h^\^ .- Deyjjl' ^rmctT^w^i '3^r ^ii^i^q^ ^til^^i^, [^<ris^^< ..®...i^......^.. !.JJ^200 3TT^r T^EF (ijcrf^q) ^RTWHf^cT ^IT^T SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mon 28-07-2010 Shri F.S. Khare, counsei foi Heard. Leamed counsel for the qualified i.T.i. trained apprentice relaxation in the rnatter of appc Category-i. it is submitted that decided by the division bench passed in a batch of petitions, GO}: P/4. in view of the facts and appropriate to direct respondents the ijght of order passed by the dl in the case of the petitioner in acci Neediess to emphasize, if vyouid be open for the petitioner t^ avaiiabie to him under the iaw. With the aforesaid observalions <=M^t<n41i TnT^ff ^f 'feTst Tfsf^R ^37Rm3TT^T an Shrivastava, J. the petitloner. ^etitioner submits that the petitioner Is a |nd the petitioner is entitied to benefjt of age <jntment on the post of Generai Mazdoor t|ie issue invoived in this petition has been bf this Court vide order dated 29/4/2010 }y of which is placed on record as Annexure circumstances of the case, It wouid be (:o consider the c-ase of the petitlonef aiso in jvlsion bench and take appropriate declsjon <>rdance with iaw. Igrievance of the petjtioner stlil suivives, it |> take recourse to such remedy, as may be >, the petition is finaiiy disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge