GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4017 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 4017 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 4017 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRI. CRI. CRI. APPEAL NO. 600 OF 2005 APPEAL NO. 600 OF 2005 APPEAL NO. 600 OF 2005 Mohd. Majlum Dost Mohd. Miya Ansari ...Applicant versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Neville D.Deboo for Abhay Bhoir for the applicant. ShriA.M.Shringarpure APP for State CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & R.C. R.C. R.C. CHAVAN, JJ. CHAVAN, JJ. CHAVAN, JJ. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 14TH JULY, 2005 14TH JULY, 2005 14TH JULY, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. In this appeal, the judgment and order dated 29th April 2004 is questioned and the application is filed for condonation of delay which occured in filing of the appeal. The circumstances, in which the delay has occured are serious. Advocate Shri Ahmed who appeared in the trial for the accused is alleged to have taken the certified copy for filing the appeal before this court and did not do so. Primafacie this may in given cirfumstances amounts to misconduct. In our opinion such negligent conduct of the matter is on the increase. We therefore feel that a copy of this order along with the copy of the Criminal Application No.4017 of 2005 be sent to the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa. 2. We, therefore, condone the delay. Heard the learned counsel on merit of the appeal. Appeal admitted. Taking into consideration the fact that the accused is convicted under sec. 302 of IPC, we see no reason to grant bail. Bail application is dismissed. ...