IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18655 of 2011 Suman Kumar son of Sri Pran Mohan Singh, resident of village- Laskara, Post-Khapra, P.S. Sangrampur (Tetiya Bumber), District- Munger. ………Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Joint Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5. The District Magistrate, Munger. 6. The District Education Officer, Munger. 7. The District Programme Officer, Establishment, Munger. 8. The Block Development Officer, Sangrampur, District-Munger 9. The Block Education Extension Officer, Sangrampur- District- Munger. 10. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Nonaji, Block-Tetiya Bumber, District-Munger. 11. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Nonaji, Block- Tetiya Bumber, District-Munger. 12. The Head Master, Middle School, Laskara, Block-Tetiya Bumber, District- Munger. …………..Respondents. ----------- 2. 21.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.C. to G.P.-8 for the respondents No. 1 to 9. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been forced to file the present writ application for a direction to make payment for the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra being held by the petitioner since 05.06.2005 in Middle School, Laskara under Gram Panchayat Raj 2 Nonajee in the district of Munger. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier also by letter No. 339 dated 24.04.2009, the District Superintendent of Education-cum-District Programme Co- Ordinator, Bihar Education Project, Munger to the Panchayat Secretary of Panchayat Noonajee, Tetiya Bumber, District Munger had directed for payment to the petitioner and in fact a cheque of Rs. 1,51,500/- (One Lac Fifty One Thousand and Five Hundred) was also sent alongwith the said letter for such payment. Learned counsel submits that inspite of that no payment has been made to the petitioner till date and for no fault or laches on his part, he is being illegally denied his legal dues, even though he has been discharging his duties without any complaint from any quarter. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court directs the respondents No. 6 and 7 to ensure that the petitioner is paid his dues for the period he has worked. Such dues should be paid to him within a period of two months from the date of production / receipt of a copy of this order upon the concerned respondents. This Court further directs that all the concerned 3 parties responsible for such payment shall also ensure that this order is complied with without any slackness. The writ petition stands disposed off. Saif/- (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)