1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10247 OF 2009 Kay Iron Works Pvt. Ltd. ....Petitioner V/s. Hasnain A. Rupani & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.S.S. Kanetkar for the Petitioner. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 25TH FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C. :- 1. This application before the trial Court was pre-mature. The Petitioner ought on the facts alleged first to have made an ad-interim application for the appointment of a Court Receiver initially for the purpose of making a report as to the state of the flat and the identity of the occupants as well as whether the flat had been dealt with in a manner contrary to the ad-interim order dated 3.11.2007. Depending upon the report, the contentions of the parties based thereon and the conduct of the parties, the Petitioner would have been entitled to make an application for police protection to implement the order. 2. An application for the appointment of a Court Receiver is pending. It is necessary that that application or even an ad-interim application therein be decided first. It is only after the report of the Court Receiver and hearing any third party that an application for police protection would be warranted. In fact considering the nature of the 2 allegations, an ad-interim application ought to be made first at least for the purpose of a Court Receiver inspecting the flat and making a report as stated above. 3. With the above clarification, the Writ Petition is disposed of.