THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1261 of 2010. Mahendra Prasad Jakhmola, S/O Late Shri Vachaspati Jakhmola. … Petitioner. Vs. Presiding Officer Labour Court, Haridwar, Uttarakhand and two others. …Respondents. Mr. M.C.Pant, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K.C.Tiwari, Brief Holder for the State-respondent no.1. Mr. Mohd. Matlub, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. B.P.Nautiyal, Advocate, for the respondent nos. 2 and 3. Date July 23, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the proceedings in Misc. Case No. 549 of 2010, B.H.E.L. Vs. M.P. Jakhmola along with notice dated 13-7-2010 issued by respondent no.1 and further to hold the review application filed by the respondent nos. 2 and 3 for reviewing the award as not tenable in the eye of law. The grievance of the petitioner is that the award was made in his favour on 1-11-2009. Under the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 after 30 days of the publication of the award, the Labour Court has become functus officio and the Labour Court has no power to entertain such type of review application. By a perusal of the notice dated 13-7-2010 (Annexure-1 to the petition) issued to the petitioner, it reveals that some application was filed for review of the award dated 1-11-2009 before the Labour Court. Notice was issued by the Labour Court fixing 31-7-2010 to file objection against the application. 2 The petitioner may raise all the objections before the Labour Court, which have been taken in the present writ petition including the jurisdiction of the labour court and the labour court before taking decision on merit on the review application shall decide the issue of maintainability as well as jurisdiction to entertain the review application first. With the above observations and direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP