IC—78 3wT "i<i<iic<-i|, an{|y'i<o, Ri^l'yy ^l^dl *<41* V^ 200 ailt?T ;t|gq; (ijt<(^<ii<jg; aii^rw R;-fi+ ^T ^iTT^T sh*i ?^<iiw ^ifOT 3D^r FT^IS^ f^ir%'tT^fp fv^ r>i5ErAJ?ui*TO?s&'@?? .&Tt 'ES?T SS'OTTIE? .A^SSS^. %»r%^USK.i. A/i* ^/S'^AA^&I A £S3i^S^%£sk,&^^S>& ^siirf^ktSA'uS^ t^^r^^^w rhs3?s'sliff?^& & a.STSSS'n A I.^/E* s^n&^.aiiSMi^.?'^ x^sitsn^ >c A' Ai^ A ,& * A'^/jo'afi^jE.'^hfcJfl •a-'-- 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. r7 Satva Naravan. S/o Dubhu; aeed about45 vears IRamu, S/o Sameram. aged about60 vears Ipasant Bai, W/o Ram Singh, aged about 60 years Ipasanti Bai. D/o Pauthi Ram, aged about 30 years ipeniram, S/o Samaru; aged about 40 years ipaghunath, S/o Samaru, aged about 58 years pantram. S/o Dukhu, aged about4Q years P resident of ViUage MusvaTodhi. P.H.No.61/87, Tahsfl Baloda Bazar, District-Raipur SC.G.'i >WSSNTS 94,'02/200S Smt. Fouzia Mirza., Shri Pradeep Singh, Heard. The petitioners are c Thodhi, TahsiI-Balodabazd acquired for consti-uction Scheme. The award dated Acquisition Officer yide An] after the acquisition of the already been taken bv 1 Division- Balodabasiai' vidl <hi<il<n<fl*i flPmf ^1^T^ <P>I^I< ^sifimsiA?! [tlotl (Ct No.63g0 of 200S 3tate of Chbattisgarh, (hrough the Secretaiy, ?evenue Deoartaient. D.K.S Bhavi'an. Raipur r^ \ ..l-r.j •and Acquisition Officer, Raipur (C.G.) fhe CoBector. Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) afcunseS forthe petit.ioners. pv. Govt. Advocate for t.he State. >wners of the land situated at. v-illage Musva r, District-Raipiir. Their private land i»'as of main canal of Navaisara Lift Imgation l8& Januaiy 1993 was passed by the Land lexure P-1. It is aven-ed in the petition that land the possession of the disputed land has :he Sub-Di'visional OTficer(Imgation), Sub- Annexiire P-2. However the amount of ?!('; % '.'is^^^s®^? 3^r -^ww^, ^v'fs, Ri<?iiy^< Nltlflt **1)cb •^ 200 V. |?°HfiptW DK?I spll'* 5- sn^r'ro^; (ijcit^«i<{ti) TCITWlfet 3(I^( 2 v' compensatjon for which 11 distributed to them despite] them and the petitioners a.i, compensation for which thejj On 20.11.2006not.iccl the respondents. However, /objection to the petition. Leamed counsel for tj sent communication to the further two weeks' time to s^ Taking into consid^ documents annexed alongl considered opinion tha.t thi^ to respqndent authorities lt ra'ised in this petition witl receipt/production of coin'j accordance with law. The pfjf if the cause of action stiil sul The petition is acco.i-d|i Certified copy as per }• 'nnfCTlll t||>)<;t( 4.'fe%t tfal^K ^'3ffOT3ii^r he petitioners are entitled has not heen several oral and written reqiiest made by \e running froro piSlar to post for obtaining are lawfuHv entitled. b were directed t.o be issuRd by this Court to |the respondents have not Tiled their reply be respondents submits that he has aiready -espondents No. 1 & 3, however he prays for ek instnictions, Iration, the avennents in the case and •with thjs petition, this Court is of the petition may be disposed ofwith a direction o redress the grievances of the petitioners lin a period of 15 days from the date of of this order after necessary enquiiy in iitioners are at tiberty to appinach this Court •vives. ___, Liies, Sd/- Dhirednra Mishra Judge S:s!SS^S^y*'SS'SS!^