IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50528 of 2008 1. KAILASH PASWAN 2. Munshi Paswan 3. Hari Paswan 4. Bhuneshwar Paswan 5. Bal Mukend Paswan 6. Ashok Paswan 7. Rohit Paswan 8. Sudama Paswan 9. Bachchu Paswan 10. Upendra Paswan 11. Pradip Paswan 12. Sanjay Paswan 13. Rajiya Devi………………………….. Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.12.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioners who are family members of the husband apprehend arrest in a Police case under Sections 302/201 of the Penal Code. The defence is that it is the husband alone who has been chargesheeted. During life time of the deceased there was no allegation against the petitioners. Petitioners 2 to 12 are the uncles of the husband and his family members. The deceased has died in one and half years of marriage. Her dead body was found abandoned with signs of assault. That the husband may have been chargesheeted when the mother of the deceased during investigation has made further accusation, does not persuade this Court to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to father and mother in-laws i.e. petitioners 1 and 13. The application is rejected in so far as they are concerned. Considering that the petitioners 2 to 12 are not immediate family members of the husband with generalised allegations let the petitioners 2 to 12, above named, surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Alok Raj, Judicial Magistrate, lst Class, Gaya in Fatehpur PS Case No. 158 of 2004, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)