IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11888 of 2006 Abhimanyu Ram, son of late Ramchhatri Ram, resident of village Siswaniya, Pokhra, P.S. Ramgarhwa, District East Champaran … Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. District Superintendent of Education, East Champaran, Motihari 3. Director, Primary Education, Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna … Respondents ----------- 2. 30.6.2011 Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into account that the petitioner had played fraud by making a false declaration at the time of seeking his appointment that he was not accused in any criminal case and that later on it could be discovered that he was accused in two criminal cases, this Court would find that the impugned order of termination of his service would not require any interference from this Court, inasmuch as the Government policy contained in the circular of compassionate appointment dated 5.10.1991 strictly prohibits appointment of a person on compassionate ground who is facing criminal prosecution for an offence punishable for a period of seven years or more rigorous imprisonment. 2 The prescribed proforma of application of compassionate appointment also contains a declaration that if any of the information given by the applicant and/or the documents furnished by him is found to be false or incorrect, the services of such person will be terminated after giving a show cause notice. The respondents have also produced the prescribed proforma signed by the petitioner in the aforementioned terms. In that view of the matter, this Court would not find any merit in the submission of Mr. Sandeep Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, that subsequently out of two criminal cases the petitioner has been exonerated in one of them or that the petitioner could not have maintained his family members. The fact remains that the petitioner still is an accused in one more criminal case and definitely was not eligible for being appointed on compassionate ground in view of the specific prohibition made in the policy of compassionate appointment. 3 That being so, this application is wholly misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/