HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 684 of 2002 (SB) Kaloo s/o Sri Kakran Singh Rajkiya Pashu Prajanan Evam Dughdh Shala Prachetra, Kalsi, District Dehradun ......Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal 2. The deputy Director Animal Husbandary, Rishikesh, District Dehradun 3. Farm Manager, Rajkiya Pashu Prajanan Evam DughShala Prachhetra Kalsi, District Dehradun Sri P.C. Jhingan, Advocate for the petitioner Standing Counsel for the respondents. Dated: 20-03-2006 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By the present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularise the service of the petitioner from the date of his initial appointed. Briefly stated according to the petitioner he has been working with respondent no. 3 since February 1998 on daily wages. The duty of the petitioner is almost identical with the regularly appointed class IV employees in the Animal Husbandry Department of Uttaranchal Government. The petitioner made several representations to the respondents’ authorities but his service has not been regularised as yet. At the time of arguments, the counsel for the petitioner confined his prayer for disposal of the representation of the petitioner. In view of above, liberty is given to the petitioner to file afresh representation before the competent authority of the respondents within one month after obtaining the certified copy of this order, who shall decided the same within two months thereafter. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Dated: 20.03.2006 Rajesh Tandon, J. *Dhyani