IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH MARCH 2008 / 29TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 9334 of 2008(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ FRANCO PAUL E.P, ERAMAKKATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, EN-HAKORE, RAMAKRISHNA IYYAR ROAD, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.MANSOOR.B.H. RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, THRISSUR. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICLER, VELOOKARA VILLAGE OFFICE, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 9334 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: MARCH 19, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that by Ext.P1, further development in the property purchased by the petitioner has been stopped. Aggrieved by Ext.P1 memo, petitioner has filed Ext.P4 representation before the 1st respondent. The complaint in this writ petition is regarding the inaction of the 1st respondent on Ext.P4. 2. If, as stated by the petitioner, Ext.P4 representation has been received and is pending before the 1st respondent, the 1st respondent shall take a decision on Ext.P4 with notice to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-