IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16079 of 2006 SATYENDRA KUMAR PATHAK, S/O LATE SACHITANAND PATHAK, VILLAGE KARPI, P.S. KARPI, DISTRICT JEHANABAD. …………………………PETITIONER. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES AND DEVELOPMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2.THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3.THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MAGADH DIVISION, GAYA. 4.THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, JEHANABAD. 5.THE AREA EDUCATION OFFICER, ARWAL, DISTRICT JEHANABAD. 6.THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, ARWAL, JEHANABAD. 7.THE DRAWING AND DISBURSING OFFICER, CUM HEAD MASTER, MIDDLE SCHOOL, UMERABAD, ARWAL(DISTRICT). 8.KEDAR PRASAD HEAD MASTER MIDDLE SCHOOL UMERABAD. …………………….RESPONDENTS. ----------- 03/ 20.07.2011 Heard Counsel for the parties. The prayer of the petitioner for payment of salary having been fully covered and rejected by an earlier order of this Court dated 24.08.2000 in C.W.J.C NO. 945 of 2000 and its being affirmed in the order dated 28.09.2000 passed in L.P.A No. 1343 of 2000 would make learned counsel for the petitioner to realize that the petitioner has got no case on merits. She has accordingly sought leave of this Court to 2 withdraw this writ application. That being so, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. It is however made clear that if the petitioner now would again move this Court for the same cause of action as prayed for in this writ application, he may be saddled with a heavy cost which was earlier condoned by the division bench in L.P.A. No. 1343 of 2000 on humanitarian ground while modifying such order of award of costs passed by learned single judge in C.W.J.C. No. 945 of 2000. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)