IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 5TH DECEMBER 2006 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 RP.No. 744 of 2006(W) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.17832/2006 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS ----------------------------------------------- 1. P.M.ABOOBACKER, S/O.MOIDEENKUTTY.P.K., AGED 57 YEARS, PULACKAL HOUSE, CHALISSERY.P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. SMT.E.V.KHADEEJA, W/O.P.M.ABOOBACKER, PULACKAL HOUSE, CHALISSERY.P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.T.BHASKARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, K.M.M.COMPLEX, KOKKALA, THRISSUR-211. 2. THE MANAGER, KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, K.M.M.COMPLEX, KOKKALA, THRISSUR-21. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHALISSERY, CHALISSERY.P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.LAKSHMI RANI R2 BYSRI.V.B.UNNIRAJ THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J ------------------------------------------- R.P.No.744 OF 2006 in W.P(C).No.17832 OF 2006 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of December, 2006 O R D E R When the writ petition came up for consideration on 18.7.2006, it was submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is a talk of settlement between the parties and that they may be permitted to withdraw the petition without prejudice to contentions. The writ petition was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. I do not find any ground to review the said judgment. The review petition is hence dismissed. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN Judge kkb.