IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37327 of 2009 1. RINKU KUMARI @ RINKU DEVI 2. LALAN THAKUR 3. UMESH PRASAD ---- PETITIONERS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR --- OPP. PARTY. ----------- 02 23.11.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioners, who are married Nand, her husband and stranger to the family, have approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Sections 304B, 201/34 of the Penal Code. It is alleged that within one year of the marriage victim was done to death in the matrimonial home in a suspicious manner. The dead body seems to have been deserted at a lonely place. This Court finds from the impugned order that in course of investigation witnesses have supported the prosecution case. In that view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Let petitioners appear before the Court below and apply for regular bail which shall be considered and disposed of by the Court below on their own merit having regard to the attending facts and circumstances of the case uninfluenced by the present order passed by this Court in the present proceeding. The application is, accordingly, disposed of. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)