. { 4 . $4 mnn Van» mpmmMHWwww‘mmF «”3. m mmwwQ { 4 HWN.xnuGnww s arm.Ewwmém‘. HEm , “H. ”U5m1; 3E. u n: , Esmiwmzu 3% Mam.“ “5 x“.:h,..6r w. 3; M i." mfg. 3w Ew m?“‘w mg .n MAwwmwa. m mad nb< Haaw nW{%w #4awwmpmxv, mm wmwunwqé w L.$‘... §m§ r n1“ “J 2w ~L$3E$7n n gum/mug w. mm» wGamma rwm£m$m w r w mwa%£wm: m . XI-HC-22 Wm mm mw 17.1;2001 Heard shri, A10}: Aradh counsel for the petitioner and Shri N.K, Shukla. Dyo .G. for the respondents. WAs regards the same matter writ petitian was fi in ,the Madhya Pradesh High . Court. at Jabalpur and ordgr was; passed by the Cqurt 9n _ll°5_;2000 in the followirg; 4manne r § ‘, ¥ W" HaVLng heard iearned co‘ for the partles, I deem expedient that the Exc; e Commisslener conslders the representation of t petitioner and takesg decision in accordance With law expeditiously preferably Within a perlod of 6 weeks from production of a copy of this order. I direct accordingly. " ‘In-gthe’ meantime during pendency of the representat'onvw/ before the Excise Commissio er 1 ?w mse’l .{ it lei r W The pet} ra } nerT ~f cad o " Le the date of communicatn. n/ at Gwalior, the High Court f I e >‘ c' m ‘ o WWW(W>~ aawm W WQW m$m WW§§¢3W“ %me§r&? aw:WWW §Nair/* Chhattisgarh came into existence” at Bilaspur a petition by the petitioner before ,this § Hence the fi.Ling of fresh Court” It is submitte§i that similar direction woulé. suffice inerthe. present circums tances .7 After hearing £he c‘ounsel for the Let a fresh representatimbe nowrmaée before K/vz‘V‘; the Excise " Commissioner On race; t of the sald representatioh. the Exc se Commlssiotwer shall examine andld’isp e of the represen- tation on merit after rectlng ndtice to espondent no.5 M/s Pri e Liquors, within a period of, five we ro the of e m date Hreceipt of this order. 1 at Ralpur, res- pendent no . 2 . partles, the prgler 1s lloweda c.C. (todayo V) ‘w‘ M GRPRJ—FS/4—4/99—20.000 . caw