IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO : 1344 of 2001 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 25/07/2001 in WP NO : 3780 OF 1995 on the file of the High Court.) Between: P.Munemma W/o.A.Jayaram Reddy H.No.7-78/2, Muthyalreddypalle Tirupati-2, Chittoor District ..... APPELLANT AND 1 Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition TTD Administrative Building Tirupathi, Chittoor District 2 The Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam Tirupathi, Chittoor District 3 Government of Andhra Pradesh Revenue (Endts-IV), Secretariat, Hyderabad, rep.by Joint Secretary .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.O.MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondents.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO :1344 of 2001 JUDGMENT: ( Per the Honourable Smt.Justice T.Meenakumari) Aggrieved by the Order, in W.P.No.3780 of 1995 dated 25.7.2001, the writ petitioner-appellant has preferred this appeal. The appellant-writ petitioner ﬁled the above writ petition challenging the Notiﬁcation issued under Section 4(1) and declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, in A.P. Gazettee dated 5.2.1992 and Andhra Jyothi daily, dated 9.2.1993. On a submission made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner before the learned Single Judge that the interim stay was granted on 2.3.1995 in the writ petition and that the compensation was not received by the petitioner so far and that she may be permitted to ﬁle an application under Section 18 of the Act for reference to the Civil Court, the learned Single Judge having observed that the petitioner should be allowed to ﬁle an application for reference under section 18 of the Act to the Civil Court and on such application, the authorities shall take appropriate action for referring the matter, dismissed the writ petition. When this appeal has come up for hearing, the learned Government Pleader submitted that he received written instructions from the Special Deputy Collector (FAC), L.A., TTDs., Tirupathi, dated 1.9.2008, to the eﬀect that the matter was referred to the Civil Court under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act and on 10.10.2002, the writ petitioner had taken the compensation awarded vide Award No.3/94-95, dated 23.2.1995 and the enhanced compensation of Rs.42,089/- as ordered by the reference Court was deposited and the petitioner was given liberty to receive the same. Therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in this appeal. In view of the above submission, We feel that no further orders need be passed in this appeal in view of the fact that the matter was referred to the Civil Court. In the above facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the submission made by the learned G.P., this writ appeal is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this writ appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. _______________________ Justice T.Meenakumari ____________________________ Justice Ramesh Ranganathan Dated: 2.9.2008 Nn/gurc. HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO : 1344 of 2001 (Judgment of the Division Bench delivered by the Honourable Smt.Justice T.Meenakumari) 2nd September, 2008