CRM No. M-22031 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. M-22031 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 24.8.2009 Lakhwinder Passi ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. GPS Bal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Rajan Gupta, J. This is a petition praying for pre-arrest bail in a case likely to be registered against the petitioner. She apprehends her false implication. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that marriage of petitioner's son had taken place with one Baljit Kaur. However, their relations became strained thereafter. The petitioner apprehends that she may be implicated in some false case at the behest of father-in-law of her son. Learned counsel has, therefore, prayed that concession of pre-arrest bail be extended to the petitioner. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and given careful thought to the facts of the case. The petitioner also earlier moved the court of Sessions Judge, Amritsar for the same relief. However, the plea for pre-arrest bail was dismissed as infructuous as the police reported that neither any CRM No. M-22031 of 2009 2 FIR had been registered against the petitioner nor any complaint had been received by the police. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to point out any change in circumstances thereafter. In case no complaint is pending with the police against the petitioner at present, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is misconceived. The petition has been filed merely on the basis of an apprehension in the mind of the petitioner. I, thus, find no ground to extend the concession of blanket bail to the petitioner. The petition is hereby dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE August 24, 2009 'rajpal'