IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39025 of 2009 SHIV NATH MAHTO, S/o Visheshwar Mahto Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 10.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 307, 326 and 387/34 and later on Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the occurrence took place on account of non-fulfilment of demand of rangdari, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. It appears that the petitioner is in custody since 01.06.2008 so the trial court is directed to conclude the trial within a reasonable time. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)