IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.7773 of 2009 Between: Bellamkonda Narsimha Reddy, S/o. Raji Reddy, R/o. Godavarikhani, Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Collector (Civil Supplies), Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddpalli Division, Karimnagar District. 3 The Tahsildar, Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings No. D/2163/2007, dt. 6-9-2007 issued by the 2nd respondent whereby canceling the authorization issued in favour of the petitioner in respect of Shop No. 4526 of Godavari Khani Area, Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District, and also action of the 1st respondent in not disposing of the Appeal filed against the aforesaid order despite of the directions issued by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.27378 of 2007 dt. 20-12-2007 and W.P.No. 2654 of 2009 dt. 12-02-2009 as the same is illegal and consequently pass an order to set aside the proceedings No. D/2163/2007, dt. 6-9-2007 issued by the 2nd respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.7773 of 2009 ORDER: It appears, questioning the proceedings dated 06.09.2007 issued by the 2nd respondent- Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapalli Division, Karimnagar, whereunder his authorization as dealer of the fair price shop No.4526 of Godavarikhani Area, Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District, was cancelled, the petitioner filed an appeal before the 1st respondent- Joint Collector (Civil Supplies), Karimnagar, and, according to the petitioner, the said appeal has not been disposed of. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies appearing for the respondents submits that the appeal filed by the petitioner, against the proceedings of the 2nd respondent, was already disposed of by the 1st respondent on 21.02.2009. In view of the above, nothing survives in this writ petition for further adjudication and the same is liable to be closed. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No order as to costs. However, this order does not preclude the petitioner from challenging the orders passed by the 1st respondent, in accordance with law. _________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 24th April, 2009. IBL