94¢ km? y/ mmw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH w.P. s No. M2 12011 / PETITI0NER : Smt. Pushpa Joshi W/o Shri Ramesh Joshi, Aged about 43 years, Occupation — Lecturer, Pt. J. L. N. Govt. Higher Secondary School New Khursipar Bhilai Distt. Durg (CG). VERSUS / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through — The Secretary, Schoo! Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. / Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ........ .... .. HIGH COURT OF CHHATI’ISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION S NO.429 OF 2011 PETITIONER Smt. Pushpa Joshi Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shn Vipin Tiwari, , Satish K. Agnihotri M Judge 1 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59 Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. _.. _-- O_RDER {ORAL} (Passed on this 17‘ day of March, 201 1) Heard Iearned counsel for the parties. Learned counset appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to benefit of two advance increments on account of having passed B.Ed. examination examination on 14-74990 before her appointment i.e. on 6~7-1993 at her own cost. It is submitted that the issue involved in the present petition is petition is no longer res integra, as the same has been finally settled by the by Supreme Court in Asha Saxena v. State ofMP. a Ors. 1. It is further submitted that this Court has aiso taken a similar view in its order dated 64-2009 passed in WP. (S) No.6257 of 2008. Learned counsel further submits that the order dated 29-4-2010 passed in W.A.No.124 of 2009 wherein reiying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena (supra)'and the order passed by this Court in another W.A.No.87 of of 2009, directions have been issued for consideration of the case for grant of two advance. increments as per the circular dated 21-9-1974 issued issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of the facts 4. pleaded in the petition. Learned ocunsel appearing for the State submits that the case of the petitioner would also be considered 5. on the same tines. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to decide the claim of the petitioner for grant of two advance increments as the per circular dated 21-9-1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after verification of the facts pleaded in the petition within a period of 8 weeks from today. Gowri Sd/—'