IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.32540 OF 2009 1. SIDHI VINAYAK JHA, SON OF LATE PANDIT MAHAVIR JHA 2. SATISH CHANDRA JHA, SON OF LATE SHRI NARAYAN JHA BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PREM NAGAR, POLICE STATION RUNNISAIDPUR, DISTRICT SITAMARHI …………………………………………………………………….PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. BARTI DEVI, WIFE OF LATE DOMA MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAE SUHNI, POLICE STATION DUMRA, DISTRICT SITAMARHI …………………………………………………………………..OPPOSITE PARTIES ******** 2 14/05/2010 Heard Counsel for the petitioners and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 09.07.2009 passed in Criminal Revision No. 14 of 2009 and the order dated 11.12.2008 passed in Complaint Case No. 645 of 2004. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that this case arises out of a land dispute and it is false and fabricated and therefore, the petitioners should be discharged for the offences allegedly committed in this case. The allegations and counter allegations can only be considered in a full fledge trial. I see no anomaly in the orders impugned. This application is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to bring on records any material he thinks fit and proper in order to prove their case. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)