IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. 59572-M of 2006 Dated of decision January 22, 2008 State of Haryana .....Petitioner Versus Smt. Beenu Chawla and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Ajay Ghangas, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the petitioner. Mr. Sumeet Goyal, Advocate for respondent No. 1. **** RAJESH BINDAL, J. Challenge in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short “the Code”) is to the order dated February 20, 2006 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad dismissing the revision filed against the order dated May 30, 2002 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridabad whereby no charge was framed against the respondents in FIR No. 1413 dated October 27, 1999 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC at Police Station, Central Faridabad. Learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 at the very out set submitted that complainant in the present case is Haryana Financial Corporation. The impugned order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad was challenged by the Haryana Financial Corporation by filing Criminal Misc. 25652- M of 2007 in this Hon'ble Court and this Court vide order dated April 26, 2007 upheld the same. Once the impugned order has already been upheld by this Court in a petition filed by the complainant in the FIR, the issues raised in the present petition cannot be re-agitated again. Even otherwise second revision under the garb of petition under Section 482 of the Code is also not maintainable once the petitioner has already failed in revision before learned Additional Sessions Judge. As the impugned order has already been upheld by this Court, the present petition is dismissed. January 22, 2008 (Rajesh Bindal) Pka Judge