IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA SECOND APPEAL NO. 72 OF 2007 SHRI. XEC YACUB XEC ALI ... Appellant Versus ZAMATUL MUSLEMEN SOCIETY REPRESENTED BY SHAIKH IBRAHIM KADAR AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Sudin Usgaonkar, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. P. P. Singh, Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 23rd July, 2008 P.C.:- This is Plaintiff's Second Appeal arising from R.C.S. No.482/2000. Heard learned Counsel on behalf of both parties. The Plaintiff filed a suit claiming that S.No. 525/13 was part of a bigger property gifted to him by his aunt in the year 1964. The suit came to be dismissed by the trial Court and the appeal filed therefrom came to be dismissed by the first Appellate Court by Judgment dated 7-8-2006. In an earlier litigation between the parties, the Plaintiff had admitted that survey No.525/13 did not belong to the Plaintiff. In the survey records, survey No.525/13 was recorded in the name of the Defendants wherein they had even constructed a school building. An expert appointed by the Plaintiff was unable to identify that survey No.525/13 was part of the property gifted to the Plaintiff by the said Deed dated 13-1-1964. In the light of the above, the dismissal of the suit by the trial Court and the appeal by the first Appellate Court could not be faulted. There is no question of law much less a substantial question of law involved in this Second Appeal. Hence, the same is hereby dismissed. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.