HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W. P. No. 7069 of 2009 FRIDAY THE 21ST DAYOF AUGUST, 2009 Between: Mutha Satyavathi And another ..... PETITIONERS AND The Mandal RevenueOfficer, Visakhapatnam Rural And two others .....RESPONDENT(S) W. P. No. 15637 of 2009 Between: Kuna Yashodha And another .. Petitioner And The Building Inspector And two others .. Respondents COMMON ORDER:- As the point involved in these two writ petitions is one and the same, they are taken up together and are being disposed of by this common order. The main grievance of the petitioners is that the official respondents, without issuing any notice and without following the due process of law, and in collusion with some anti-social elements, are threatening to demolish their houses in question and dispossess them from their properties. Hence, the petitioners have filed these two writ petitioners seeking appropriate directions. The 3rd respondent-Building Inspector, who is the 1st respondent in W.P.No.15637 of 2009, has filed counter affidavit in W.P. No.7069 of 2009 inter alia denying the averments made in the affidavits filed in support of the writ petitions and stated that on enquiry and physical inspection of the sites in question, it was noticed that the houses claimed by the petitioners are in occupation of different persons and the respondent-Corporation never interfered with the possession of petitioners over the properties nor posed any threat of demolition of their houses and eviction of the petitioners from their properties. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Government Pleader for Revenue and the learned Standing Counsel for Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation. In view of the specific denials made in the counter affidavit and having regard to the stand taken by the learned Standing Counsel for G.V.M.C. that they are not interfering with the petitioners’ properties nor posing any threat of demolition of their houses and eviction of the petitioners from their properties, no orders need be passed in the writ petitions, and the same are accordingly closed. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 21st August, 2009 bcj