IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12773 of 2006 SHIV NARAIN YADAV,SON OF LATE DUKHI PRASAD YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-SINGION, P.S.GMHARIYA,DISTRICT-MADHEPURA. …………………PETITIONER. Versus 1.THE B.N.MANDAL UNIVERSITY,MADHEPURA, THROUGHT ITS REGISTRAR. 2.THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA, DISTRICT-MADHEPURA. 3.SHRI T.K. GHOSH, COMMISSIONER, KOSHI DIVISION, SAHARSA CUM-VICE-CHANCELLOR, B.N.MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA. 4.SHRI BADRI PRASAD YADAV (BIPRA), REGISTRAR, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA, DISTRICT- MADHEPURA. 5. DR. SHAILENDRA MISHRA, LECTURER, SAHARSA COLLEGE, SAHARSA, DISTRICT- SAHARSA. ………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 03.11.2010 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the B.N.Mandal University as with regard to the following reliefs:- “That this is an application for calling upon respondent nos. 1 to 4 to produce the order along with the file of respondent no.5 by which a decision has been taken for posting/ appointing respondent no.5 as Principal of R.M.College, Saharsa (hereinafter referred to as “the College”) and quash the same. The petitioner further prays for issuance of appropriate writ/order/direction directing the respondents not to disturb the petitioner from the post of principal of the College and/or for issuance of any appropriate writ/writs which may be found appropriate in the facts of the present case” 2 this Court is of the opinion that now when the petitioner has already retired from service, any adjudication pertaining to his grievance of being ignored in course of so called elevation of respondent no.5 on the post of Professor In-charge /Principal of R.M. College, Saharsa, will serve no fruitful purpose. It is however, made clear that though the writ application has become infructuous on account of retirement of the petitioner but then the disposal of the writ application will not mean that this Court has approved the appointment of respondent No.5 on the post of Principal /Professor in-charge and if and when such an issue is raised by any other aggrieved person the same shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. With the aforementioned observation this writ application is disposed of. Devendra/ ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)