HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.9850 of 2006 Date : 10-6-2011 Between : Lanka Gopalam and others .. Petitioner And The District Collector, East Godavari District and others .. Respondent Counsel for petitioners : Sri N.Chandrasekhar for Sri C.V.R. Rudra Prasad Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 : A.G.P. for Revenue Counsel for respondent No.3 : A.G.P. for Endowments Counsel for respondent No.4 : None appeared Counsel for respondent Nos. 5 : Sri V.T.M. Prasad, Standing Counsel The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief : “….to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of mandamus declaring the land acquisition notifications in Ref/G3/1901/2006 and Ref/G3/1904/2006 dated 2-5- 2006 issued by respondent No.1 seeking to acquire land in Sy.No.771/2, admeasuring Ac.8-96 cents, Sy.No.612 admeasuring Ac.8-06 cents and Sy.No.605 admeasuring Ac.2-17 cents owned by respondent Nos.4 and 5 and possessed by the petitioners by invoking urgency clause and dispensing with the procedure contemplated under Section 5-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as illegal, arbitrary, colourable exercise of power, contrary to the Judgements of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct respondent Nos.1 and 2 to drop all further proceedings including the impugned notification….” At the hearing, Sri N.Chandra Shekar, learned counsel representing Sri C.V.R. Rudra Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, interim order dated 9-5-2006 in WPMP No.12461/2006 is vacated, WVMP Nos.4180/2010 and 3704/2010 are disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy Date : 10-6-2011 AM