(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. Civil Application No. 15066 of 2010 (In Writ Petition No. 2084 of 2009) Jitendra Chatarsing Rajput, Age : 21 years, Occupation : Education, .. Applicant R/o. Garkheda, Taluka : Jamner, (Original petitioner) District : Jalgaon. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary of the Department of Social Welfare, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32. 2. The Regional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, through Member Secretary, Nashik Division No.2, Head Office, Dhule, Kasturi Towers 10, Badgujar Plot, Parola Road, Dhule. 3. Admission Control Committee, through Chairman, 305, 3rd floor, Government Politechnique Building, 49, Kherwadi, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. (2) 4. North Maharashtra University, through its Registrar, Jalgaon. 5. Kai Yashodabai Dagadu Saraf Charitable Trust, through Principal, Sakegaon, Taluka : Bhusawal, District : Jalgaon. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. S.P. Deshmukh, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. V.H. Dighe, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr. M.V. Deshpande, Advocate, for respondent no.3 (Absent). None for respondent no.4. Mr. V.D. Hon, Advocate, for respondent no.5 (Absent). ........................ CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE : 16TH NOVEMBER 2010 (3) COURT'S ORDER (Per B.R. Gavai, J.) : 1. By way of present application, the applicant is seeking a direction to the respondents, to permit him to appear for 3rd year B. Pharmacy course examination scheduled in November 2010. 2. Taking into consideration the merits of the matter, this Court, vide order dated 15th April 2009, had granted ad interim relief in terms of prayer clauses "F" and "G". Subsequently, vide order dated 30th September 2009, rule has also been issued. 3. Perusal of prayer clauses "F" and "G" would reveal that the petitioner had sought stay to the effect and operation of the order impugned dated 17th February 2009, and an order of restraint against the respondents, from taking any action in pursuance to the order dated 17th February 2009. 4. In that view of the matter, we find that the petitioner is entitled to the reliefs claimed in the Civil Application. 5. The Civil Application is, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clause "B". Needless to state, that if the result of the petitioner's performance in the earlier examination has not yet been declared, the same shall be declared. It is further clarified (4) that after appearance of the petitioner for 3rd year B. Pharmacy course examination, the result of his performance at the said examination shall also be declared by respondent nos.4 and 5. ( R.M. BORDE ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/ca15066