IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM MONDAY, THE 19TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 28TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 10251 of 2010(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- GOPAKUMAR P.V., S/O.VIJAYAN PILLAI, PULINCHOTTIL HOUSE, CHENGAMANAD P.O., ALUVA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.SREEJITH S.NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALUVA RURAL. 2. THE ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ALUVA. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER CHENGAMANAD POLICE STATION. 4. R.V.JAYAKUMAR, S/O.VISWANATHAN MULLEPALLAPARAMBIL HOUSE, PUTHENVELIKKARA VILLAGE, CHERUKADAPURAM KARA, KANAKANKADAVU, PATTAM. 5. R.V.BABU, S/O.VISWANATHAN, MULLEPALLAPARAMBIL HOUSE, PUTHENVELIKKARA VILLAGE, CHERUKADAPURAM KARA, KANAKANKADAVU, PATTAM. 6. BINOY @ GILLAPY BINOY S/O.VARKEY, VALLATHUKARAN HOUSE, THURUTHISSERY, ATHANI, KARIYAD. ADV. SRI.N.NAGARESH FOR R4,5 SRI.T.V.VINU FOR R4,5 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPIN DAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No.10251 OF 2010 ------------------------ Dated this the 19th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking directions for police protection, the stand taken by the police is that this petition is the result of a dispute between two fractions of the BJP. The learned counsel for the respondents 4 and 5 submitted that those respondents have absolutely nothing to do with the above dispute. The learned counsel submitted that the respondents 4 and 5, who are not at all involved, have no intention whatsoever to cause any danger to the life of the petitioner. No representation for the petitioner. We notice that though this writ petition was admitted way back on 25/3/2010, this court did not become inclined to pass any interim order. In other words, the petitioner's life has been safe even without any interim order by this court. WPC NO.10251/2010 .2. We dispose of this writ petition recording the submissions made on behalf of respondents 4 and 5 and directing the 3rd respondent to keep vigil and ensure that dispute between the petitioner and the 6th respondent if any does not give rise to any law and order situation. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE. dpk