IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20740 of 2010 1. SHAMBHU YADAV @ SHAMBHU KUMAR YADAV, S/o Dilchand Yadav. 2. Dilchand Yadav, S/o Late Jhingo Yadav. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 17.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the fact that the petitioners are not named in the First Information Report but suspected to have committed this occurrence on account of earlier dispute about three months back with the deceased, let the petitioners above named who are in custody since 31.03.2010 and have no criminal antecedents be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Rupouli (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 4 of 2010 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy 2 as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)