Cg [90 /$i§m§3 ww ’@ , / (D RESPONDENTS IN THE HON’BLE HIGH couR'r OF crG. AT BILAsmR W3. (e) No. ) $019 7/2008 PETITIONER .M/rs Shree Bhawani Rice Mill, Through: Its Pafritn " er Narsing Das Bhéotda, S/o Late Shri Madan Lal Ji Bhabtda, raged about 48 years, Registered Office rat ChaHdrakhuri, District-Burg (C.G.) VERSUS / 1. Central Bankofilndia‘ A Bedy Corporate, ’Consti’tu'ted Under the Booking Comp’aririe’s (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act 1970, Through The Managing Director, Head Office at Chandramukhi, Nanman Point Mumbai {Maharashtra) The Regional Mahager, Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Raifpu’r :(CG). 3. Branch Manager Central Bank of India, Branch Durg at Rungta Bhawan, GE District—Durg Road, Durg, ’(C.G.) RIT PETITION U A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The following is most respectfully submitted on behalf of the, petitioner: maamur ,. , W HEQH {IGUI‘lT G? CEHATTEGARH AT BILASPUR Writ i3£titi0n (C? N0. 1S6”? 0i’23i)8 PETITEONER M/s Shri Bhawani Rice Mm, Through: Its Palmer Narsing Das BhOO‘Lda. S/o Late Shri Madam Lal Ji Bhootda, aged about 48 years, Registered Oiiice at Chandrakhuri, District Burg (CG). VERSUS RE§PONDENT . Cemral Bank of India A company corporate, Constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undeitaking) Act, 197G, Tln‘ough The Managing Director, Head Otiice at Chandramuklii. Narirnan Point Mumbai (Maharashtra). The Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, Regional NJ Oiiice, Raipur (CG). bi Branch Manager Centrai Bank of India, Branch Durg at Rungta Bhawan, GE Road, Durg, District Chhattisgarh (CG). (WRIT PE‘I‘lTlON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONS‘I‘ITUHON OF LNDIA) (SB: Eion’bie Mr. Batish K. Agninoti'i, J.) Brescnt : Shri Prateci; Shanna with Shri RR. ?ata1mar, Advocates for the / petitioner. None for the respondents. (Bassed on 5th day of December, mgg) 1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition on 20.03.2008 against the notice ' dated 14.02.08 (Annemre 13/3), issued by the responcient Bank, under Section 13 (2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of- Financial Assets and Elnorcement of Security interest Act, 2692 (for short "the Act 2002’). for recoveiy ofduex I TLearned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the instant petition was tiied on the ground that no Presiéing Qtticer in Dehts Recovery Tribunai M I Sahu . . It is brougiit to the notice ofthi‘s Couit that Vida notiiication dated 12.11.2008 (Annexure-A), Shri Narendra Kumar, Fresirjmg Oificer, Debts Recmiery Tribunal, Lucknow, has been auihorized to discharge the iimetions o ‘?3‘esidi:1 Officer, Debts Recevery Tribunal, Jabaipur, in adclition to his own charge, with immediate etfect. I( r1 Wyn/amt fawn: Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that since the petitloner wrap-ram " I» k has alreaéy preferred ank(appea$§and now the Presiding Otfrcer is available to hear the matters at Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jabalpui‘, this petition may be disposed ofwith liberty to the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy. . Having heard learneri counsel appearing for the parties and keeping in View of the facts that statutory appeal is available under the provisions of Section 17 of (x we; u (Iliad/3611M m g£€iQLFtLfTOI tiie . ct 4002, and further that the etitionen has already tiled aim which I \ I% is pending consideration before the DRT: Jabaipur, this petition is disposed of [. cl/‘intt‘tairs’m " reserving liberty to the petitioner to pursue the pendingbel'ore the DRT, A Ilabaipur, for proper retiressai/acijudication ot‘the matter. No order asto costs. 13onsequently, pending applications, it‘any, stands disposed of. O\ Sd/— Satish K.Agniimtri I Judge t: ..