FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10399 OF 2010 “ Sameer Abdulgafar Shaikh and others Vs. State of Maharashtra and others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. S.S. Thombre, Advocate for the petitioner Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 Mr. V.C. Patil, Advocate holding for Mr. U.B. Bondar, Advocate for respondent No.4. CORAM :- D.B. BHOSALE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 18th April, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2] By this writ petition, the petitioners are seeking direction to respondent No.4 to issue appointment order in pursuance of their selection made by the District Selection Committee, Beed. It appears that though the petitioners were selected, appointment letters were not issued in view of the Govt. Resolution dated 5/6/2010 ( Exhibit `E'). By this Govt. Resolution, the Government imposed ban for a period of one year in making such appointments. 3] Learned Assistant Government Pleader has placed on record another Govt. Resolution dated 29th November, 2010 and submitted that in view of this resolution, it would be open to the FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10399 OF 2010 “ Sameer Abdulgafar Shaikh and others Vs. State of Maharashtra and others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 respondent Zilla Parishad to make appointments to Group C and D posts, on the basis of the select list. 4] Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 4 and 5 submits that after the period of one year gets over and if the Government permits them, they will make appointments on the basis of the select list already prepared by the District Selection Committee, Beed. The statements made by learned AGP and learned counsel for respondent Nos. 4 and 5 are accepted. 5] In view of of the statements made by learned AGP and learned counsel for respondent Nos. 4 and 5, learned counsel for petitioners does not press the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as not pressed. However, all contentions of the petitioners are kept open. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] grt/-