IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17187 of 2010 1. YOGENDRA GANESH S/O SRI RAM PRASAD GANESH R/O VILL.- HALDIBARI, P.S.- POTHIYA, DISTT.- KISHANGANJ 2. BIMAL CHANDRA SINGH S/O LATE BHOLA NATH SINGH R/O VILL.- BARHARIYA, P.S.- TAIYABPUR, DISTT.- KISHANGANJ-PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PURNEA 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION-CUM-SUB- DIVISIONAL EDUCATION OFFICER, KISHANGANJ 4. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, KISHANGANJ 5. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, PICHHALA (KISHANGANJ) 6. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, PICHHALA, KISHANGANJ-----------------------RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 17.5.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Despite indulgence shown to the petitioners vide order dated 11.5.2011 they have failed to produce any material which includes any judicial order or notification which in any way can support the claim of the petitioners that their one year training as teachers obtained by them years ago is as good as two years training which is required in terms of the Panchayat Teachers Appointment Rule 2006. If the basic eligibility for appointment as teacher as per the Rule is two years of training and if one year training is not equivalent in any manner, then obviously the contention of the petitioners remains a contention not supported by any authority. In view of the same no interference is called for with the decision in question or for a direction to allow the petitioners to continue on the post when they came to be appointed with only one year training at the time of their initial appointments. This writ application has no merit and it is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)