IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9206 of 2011 1. Shatrughan Thakur S/O Late Ram Ashish Thakur R/O Vill.- Madhaub, P.O.- Susta Madhopur, Bhaya, Ramna, P.S.- Kudhani, (O.P.Turki), Distt.- Muzaffarpur 2. Satya Narayan Thakur S/O Late Harkit Thakur R/O Vill.- Madhaub, P.O.- Susta Madhopur, Bhaya, Ramna, P.S.- Kudhani, (O.P.Turki), Distt.- Muzaffarpur Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur 2. The Additional Collector, Muzaffarpur 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, East, Muzaffarpur 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, West, Muzaffarpur 5. The District Sub- Registrar, Muzaffarpur 6. The Deputy Director Land Reform, East, Muzaffarpur 7. The Deputy Director Land Reform, West, Muzaffarpur 8. The Circle Officer, Kudhani, Muzaffarpur ---------------------------------- 2 14/10/2011. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners pray for a direction to respondents to consider their case along with others whose lands have been declared as residential grades, whereas their lands have been left out as Danhar and Bhikha land vide order of the District Magistrate Muzaffarpur dated 26.12.2009/11.02.2011 contained in Annexure 1, though there is no policy decision in this regard. The petitioners submit that their lands falling in Muzaffarpur district mentioned in map contained in Annexure 3 to the writ petition, have wrongly been marked for which they have already filed a detailed representation before respondent no.1. 2 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners as also the respondents, I am of the view that the petitioners should pursue their remedy/representation before respondent no.1. In case, the petitioners file representation(s) before respondent no.1, if not filed earlier, the same would be disposed of on its own merit. The writ petition stands disposed of. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)