1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 4036 OF 2004 (Shri Ramdeobaba Smarak Sarvajanik Samiti and another .v. State of Mah and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri Bhangde, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri J.B. Jaiswal, AGP for the respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri J.B. Kasat, Advocate for the respondent No.3. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 18TH NOVEMBER, 2008 Heard. The respondent No.3 has filed a pursis dated which states thus :- “That, the respondent No.3, Samiti is ready to reconsider the aspects raised by the petitioners as per the Samiti's policy decisions which are followed in all other cases uniformly by affording opportunity of hearing to the parties. Hence this pursis.” It is obvious from what has been stated in the pursis quoted above that the respondent No.3 is willing to reconsider the case of the petitioners. In view of this pursis, the orders passed by the respondent No.3 impugned in the petition are set aside. 2 The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.3 states that the Committee will take fresh decision within a period of three months from today. Statement is accepted. Writ Petition is disposed of as such. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.