IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 16117 of 2008 Decided on: 23.6.2011 Lal Bahadur …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate . General with Mr. R.P.Singh, Assistant . Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : It is not in dispute that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment dated 17.3.2010 rendered by this Court in Phool Maya Versus State of H.P. & Others, CWP(T) No. 10220 of 2008 (O.A. No. 240 of 2004). 2. Consequently, the present petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization, in view of the principles laid down in the judgment cited hereinabove, within a period of 8 weeks from today after production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge June 23, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No