IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5432 of 2010 ABDUL RAHMAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR -- -----a---- 2 23.2.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the informant. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under secitons341,323,325,307,504,506 and 302/34 of the I.P.C. Taking into consideration the fact that there is counter version of the occurrence in which the petitioner is the informant who also sustained injury in the transaction and the deceased died later on in the hospital during course of treatment and in facts no offence under section 302 of I.P.C. is made out, let the petitioner, above named, who is in custody since 1.9.2009 having no criminal antecedent be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Pupri at Sitamarhi, in Nanpur P.S. Case No.105/09 subject to the conditions that (a) one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (b) the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and 2 (c) the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. AnilKr.Sinha (Anjana Prakash,J.)