/^ -^ <7T57A IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S( No. (^,^ 2/ /2010 PETITIONER : Dineshwari Rawat, W/o. Chauhan Singh Rawat, Aged about 21 years, R/o. ViUage Podaguda, Block and TehsU Devbhog, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) s RESPONDEirtS yf y^ o^ ^•y/f ^^v^^o ^ ^^ '^•- <^ VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department of Woman and ChUd Development, D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur (C.'G.) 2. 3. /< 5< Coinmissioner-ciun Director, Directorate of Woraan and Child Development, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Directorate of Panchayat social Welfare Raipur (C.G.) CoUector, Raipur, (C.G.) District Rrogramme Officer, District Woman and Child Development Officer, Raipur (C.G.) Projecf OfGcer, Integrated Child Developnient Rroject Devbhog , Distt. Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITIOBr UW&ER ARTICLE 226 0V THE CONSTITCTIOir OF CTDIA 6. ^s38 ff^ '8. 1ft. HiHwr a»*<i«h ^ST'^TllRTiT, 'S'cftWTg', fi|<.1iy^< ..^.$?,...y>.3...$V?.:.6!S.2>.!j^ sn^i 'ti^? (ijcj^ai^q) an^iwft^w '^T£TT ^TT??T'3Ri^ TCIIW^lfelST^f <:bl<1^<frT lim^ff ^ 'fe^t Tf^T^TC ^3ffOT3II^?I 20.11.3010 SIiri Shashaak Thakur, Shri Vaibhav Goverd'iian., Grievance of fhe petitio: 4.9.2010 an advertisemenf (An fh.e respondent N0.6 iayitins Angan Badi Worker aud Clau specificaliv provides thgt a c; resident of the sam.e villa.ge ia sita-iated. Accordiag to fh.e resident of fhe viilage Podagud; in the tentative list and fhe oty said viUage, have been placed Counsel for the petitione may be permitted to wifhdraw| be issued to fhe responden] representation/objection dated| •J3unsel for the petitioner. |P.L. forfhe Siate/respondeats. ^ier ia this petition is ftiat on (lexure P/ 1) has been issued by |Uie appUcations for fhe post of »e 2 of the said advertiseineut fididate should be a penaanent wliich the Angaa Badi centi^ is ;titioner, she is a permaaent but has been placed at Sl. No.7 'r caadidates who are not of the head ofthe petitioner. |r subm.its fbat at this stage, he this peution aad. direction inay N0.6 to decide her peiidinj 21.10.2010 (Aimexure P/3). Stafe counsel represeatatioB/objecuon inade) is decided by the respondent N| Accordiagly, the petitio4 petition with a directi.GH to representation to the respond|s no objection if ttie by fhe petitioner (Annexure P/3) ;r is permitted to withdraw fb.is he Tietitioner to inake a fresh ;nt N0.6 withia a period of one \ '^ ^ ff ^"S-BE—JS Ni*(yii giwqi ~SST •^ww'f, ®t)|y'i<o,t^diy^ ..&...(-<>3..;.^.:6fc-&' 3n^?i'tpiqT (Tpf3^r) 3n^?iw R-ii'* ^T •3TT^?T ^RT^ ?WIW^tel3II^I week from. ttie date of receipt fhe same would be decided by fllrtlier period of one nionth. 1t is m.ade clear fhat thil opiaion on merits of fhe cas( would be at liberty to deci.de witb. law. t?>ii[<n<fli iTTR^ff tf 'fe^t <f^^R ^rsifinsn^B f copy of this otder arad in tum ^ie aufhority concemed within a ^ Court has not expressed any aiid the aufhority coacenied he sam.e stricfly in aecoid.aace Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge 7 "VW-1-' ^'<ft/ ?&Irf v<wn-J'