IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.1549 of 2001 Date of decision: 16.02.2011 Darshan Singh ....Petitioner Versus State (UT Chandigarh) ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Sunil Chadha, Advocate, for Mr. Satinder Khanna, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Pal Verma, Advocate, for Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for UT Chandigarh. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that revision of the co-accused being Cr. Revision No.1524 of 2001 was decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.3.2009, copy of which is handed over in the Court, which is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that present petition be disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in Cr. Revision No.1524 of 2001 titled “Charanjit Singh Vs. State (U.T. Chandigarh). Disposed of in terms of the order passed in Cr. Revision No.1524 of 2001 titled “Charanjit Singh Vs. State (U.T. Chandigarh). (Alok Singh) Judge February 16, 2011 R.S.