IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.8510 of 2011 1. Chhotelal Patel 2. Raj Kumar Patel Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3/ 11.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Informant’s daughter is said kidnapped by these petitioners for the purpose of marriage. Marriage is accepted but kidnapping by petitioners’ hand in the incident is denied. It is specifically said that informant’s daughter was in love of one Rupesh Kumar. Both left the house voluntarily and married. If it is not accepted then also co-accused, Rupesh Kumar is liable for the same. Having considered the same, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 98 of 2010. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)