1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9340 OF 2007 Suchitra S. Sankhe ..Petitioner. Vs. The Mumbai Suburban Education Society and others ..Respondents. ..... Ms. A.K. Bairagdar i/b M/s. M.P. Vashi & Associates for the Petitioner. Mr. V.R. Walawalkar i/b M/s. B. Amin & Co. for Respondents 1 and 2. Mr. A.P. Vanarase, AGP for Respondent No.3. ..... CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 21st April, 2008. P.C. : The Petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on probation. Her services were brought to an end on the ground that the Education Officer had granted his approval only upto 30th April, 2000. The Tribunal has considered the service record of the Petitioner and has found that the management was justified in terminating the probationary appointment on account of the quality of work not being found to be satisfactory. The Tribunal has assessed the material in paragraph 7 of the impugned order. The assessment made by the Tribunal cannot be regarded as suffering 2 from any infirmity so as to warrant any interference by this Court in the exercise of the writ jurisdiction. Though the order of termination does not refer to the unsatisfactory nature of the services of the Petitioner, it is well settled that it is open to the management while considering the question as to whether the services of the Petitioner should be confirmed to assess the quality of work and performance. Such an assessment does not by its very nature amount to a stigma. In view of the fact that the Tribunal has come to the conclusion that the services were terminated for a justifiable reason, no case for interference has been made out. The Petition is accordingly dismissed. *****