1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 127 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 561 OF 2010 IN L.C. SUIT NO. 6073 OF 2004 Kaushal Kumar Parasnath Singh ).. Appellant Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ).. Respondent Mr. S.R. Rajguru with Mr. M.S. Bhardwaj and Mr. J.B.Mishra for MSB Legal for the Appellant. CORAM : J.N. PATEL, ACTING C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 6TH MAY 2010 P.C. This Letters Patent Appeal challenges an order passed by the learned Single Judge in First Appeal No. 561 of 2010 along with Civil Application No.1333 of 2010. 2. The First Appeal challenged the judgment and decree of the trial Court dated 24th February 2010 in L.C. Suit No.6073 of 2004. The Appellant is the original Plaintiff in the Suit. 2 3. The Appeal preferred before the learned Single Judge was invoking Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as amended in 2002. 4. When the present Letters Patent Appeal was placed before us for admission, we invited the attention of Mr.Rajguru, learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant to Section 100-A of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 which has been introduced from 1st July 2002. In terms of this statutory provision, no Letters Patent Appeal would lie against a judgment and decree of a Single Judge of this Court. In terms of this clear prohibition in law, this Letters Patent Appeal is not maintainable. It is accordingly dismissed. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.