IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1856 of 2006 USHA DEVI Versus MANJOO DEVI & ANR ----------- 3 19.05.2009 This case has been listed under the heading “To Be Mentioned” at the instance of learned counsel for the petitioner. He points out that in the order dated 23.4.2009 disposing of the civil revision application the party position has been wrongly mentioned by mistake. He submits that the petitioner was defendant in the suit who had filed petition which was registered as Misc. Case No. 12 of 2002 and was disposed of by order dated 23.8.2006 by the court below. After perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the word plaintiff mentioned in paragraph nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 have been wrongly mentioned. It should be defendant. Similarly word defendant mentioned in paragraph no.2 has been wrongly mentioned. It should be plaintiff. The order dated 23.4.2009 is therefore modified to the extent that the word plaintiff mentioned in the order in various paragraphs should be read as defendant and word defendant mentioned in the order should be read as plaintiff. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)