IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.151 of 2008 PRAMOD VYAS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 28.7.2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that in the order of the Circle Officer, Bettiah dated 22.10.2005 there is no finding that the petitioner Pramod Vyas should also go to the Civil Court to get a declaration that he is adopted son of Kamala Devi. This Court at page 4 of the order dated 27.06.2008 passed in C. W. J. C. No. 9872 of 2007 had observed that the Circle Officer had come to a finding that Pramod Vyas should go to the civil court to get a declaration that he is adopted son of Kamala Devi. That sentence, namely, “The Circle Officer has also rejected the case, put forward by Pramod Vyas and has observed that Pramod Vyas may move the civil court to get a declaration that he is the adopted son of Kamala Devi.” may be deleted from the order sheet and should be read as “the Circle Officer has not passed any orders on the merits of the claim of Pramod Vyas.” This Court finds that the other errors pointed out in the order sheet are not tenable. The review application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)