y Gowri HSGHCOURTQFCHHATTJSGARH:B(LASPUR WRIT PETITiON N0.1257 OF 2004 PETSTSONER RESPONDENTS 2. Vieky @ Naresh, S/o Siddhu, Sweeper, R/o vlllage Atama Nagar, P,S, Bango, DistrictKorba(CG). Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector, District Magistrate, Korba, District Korba (CG). Superintendent of Pollce, Distrjct Korba (CG). (Writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of !ndja) Single Bench : Hon'b!e Shri S.atish K. Agnihotri, J, Present:- Shri Ravish Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vinay Harit, Dy. Advocate General for the State ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 6"* day of Movember, 2008) 8y this petition, the petitioner seeks t6 challenge the iegaiity and validity of the show cause notice dated 6-4-2004 (Annexure- P/1) issued by the District Magistrate, Korba, calling upon the petitioner to submjt his response as to why the petitioner may not be externed for a period of one year from District Korba and other contiguoiis distnots. 2) After having examined the case, this Court by order dated 10-5-2004 ordered to proceed with the case, but no fjnal order may be passed tilj the next of hearing. 3) Section 7 of the Chhattisgarh Suraksha AdhJniyam, 1990 (for short •The Adhinsyam, 1990") provides for passjng of an externment order for sych a period as may be therejn, byt In no the shouid exceed a period of one year of the date from which jt was mad© 4) The facts available in the year 2004 ie at the time of issue of show cause notice may not be relevant today. Thus, it is not necessary to adiji^dicate on the facts as available in the year 2004. 5) In view of the foregoing, this petition Js disposect of. However, the State i3 at iiberty to take any steps, if so advised, in accordance with the law 8) Consequently, M.OA^.).P.No.1128/2004 aiso stands disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotrl Judge