HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.3696 of 2011 Date: 11-11-2011 Between Doli Rama Swamy and 4 others … Petitioners/Defendants 1 & 3 to 6 and Kachwal Rameshwarlal Sharma and 10 others … Respondents/Plaintiffs Doli Pullaiah (Died) and 5 others … Respondents/Defendants 2 & 7 to 11 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.3696 of 2011 Order: Heard Sri S.Chalapathi Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Namavarapu Rajeswara Rao, learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 11. 2. This civil revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the defendants 1 and 3 to 6 in the suit in O.S.No.30 of 1999 aggrieved by the order dated 08-7-2011 passed in I.A.No.384 of 2010 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubabad, Warangal district. 3. The suit is filed for specific performance of agreement of sale dated 14-3-1981. The petitioners-defendants 1 and 3 to 6 have disputed the signatures on the said document. In view of the dispute raised by them, the respondents 1 to 11-plaintiffs have filed I.A.No.384 of 2010 for sending the documents for handwriting and finger print expert for comparison of the admitted signatures and thumb impressions of the defendants 1, 3 and 4 along with the disputed documents dated 30-11- 1998 to have an opinion on the said signatures. 4. In this civil revision petition, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners-defendants 1 and 3 to 6 that though there are no contemporaneous signatures, the impugned order is passed by the trial Court for sending the documents for opinion. 5. I have closely perused the impugned order in detail and valid and sound reasons have been recorded by the trial Court for allowing the application filed by the respondents-plaintiffs. In view of the reasons assigned by the trial Court in the impugned order, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case to interfere with the impugned order in exercise of powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 6. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is devoid of merits and the same is liable to be dismissed. As much as the suit is of the year 1999, I deem it appropriate to direct the trial Court to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 6 (six) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. Subject to the above directions, the civil revision petition is disposed of, at the stage of admission, confirming the order under revision. No costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J. 11th November, 2011. Ak HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.3696 of 2011 11th November, 2011. (Ak)