mst FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.212 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1091 OF 2010 Sachin Prabhakar Vichare and others Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr.N.G.Bane for the applicant. Mr.P.A.Pol, P.P. for the State. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 5th July 2010 PC :- 1. The criminal application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.) mst FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1091 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr.N.G.Bane for the petitioner. Mr.P.A.Pol, P.P. for the State. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 5th July 2010 PC :- 1. In view of order passed in Criminal Application No.212 of 2010 today, the petition memo in Writ Petition No.1091 of 2010 be amended accordingly within one week. Learned APP to file reply before next date. Stand over for two weeks. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)