IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM MONDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2011 / 21ST CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 10864 of 2011(G) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. SEENATH. A, AGED 42, W/O ABDUL AZIZ, SEENAS, CHIRAKKARA, THALASSERY. 2. K.P. ABDUL AZEEZ, AGED 52, S/O.V.P. MOOSA, -DO- BY ADV. SRI.K.S.MADHUSOODANAN, SRI.T.V.JAYAKUMAR NAMBOODIRI, SRI.THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY, SRI.M.M.VINOD KUMAR, SRI.P.K.RAKESH KUMAR, SMT.M.A.RUXANA.. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. REGIONAL MANAGER, CANARA BANK, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 013. 2. CHIEF MANAGER, CANARA BANK, THALASSERY BRANCH, THALASSERY, PIN-670 102. R1 & R2 BY ADV. MR.N. RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/04/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs C.K.ABDUL REHIM,J. ------------------------------- WP(C).NO. 10864 of 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of April, 2011 JUDGMENT Challenge is only against Ext.P2 demand notice, which is issued under section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI Act) . The petitioner has got an effective remedy as provided under section 13(3A). Hence it is highly premature for this court to entertain this writ petition. However, it is made clear that if any objection/representation is filed, the 2nd respondent Bank will consider the same and take an appropriate decision. The writ petition is dismissed with the above observations. C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE pmn/ WP(C) .10133/2011 2