IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.627 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.03.2011 Samunder Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner was earlier discharged by the Court, however, later on summoned to face trial under Section 319 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that order summoning the accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C., who has been earlier discharged by the Court, is under challenge in Criminal Revision No.3173 of 2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the pendency of the revision, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition to raise all the points in the pending revision in the light of judgment of this Court in the matter of Raj Narain Yadav V/s The State of Haryana and others, CRR No.2801 of 2010 decided on 10.2.2011. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (Alok Singh) Judge March 16, 2011 R.S.