IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16313 of 2010 1. RAM SAGAR MAHTO 2. RAM BABU MAHTO 3. RAM KARAN MAHTO ALL SONS OF LATE BASUDEO MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MADHOPUR RAUSHAN @ BHISA, P.S. DUMRA, DISTRICT SITAMARHI. ---- PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAM DEO RAI, SON OF LATE SIBAN RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MADHOPUR RAUSHAN @ BHISA, P.S. DUMRA, DISTRICT SITAMARHI. ---- OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 2 6.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners have challenged the order of discharge dated 19.4.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are the bond fide purchasers of the land in question and therefore, the allegation that they had cut a branch of a mango tree is frivolous and malafide. It is also submitted that a title suit has been filed by the opposite party in the Court below. All these aspects will be considered by the Court while hearing the parties during trial. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)