IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.17851 of 2010 Date of Decision : October 01, 2010. M.P.S.Dhillon .....Petitioner versus Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Gurcharan Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks quashing of the charge-sheet dated 22.12.2009 (Annexure P-2), primarily, on the plea that much before its issuance, the Chairman of the Corporation had taken a conscious decision that instead of charge-sheeting, the petitioner be advised to be careful in future. It is stated that not-withstanding the said decision, the impugned charge-sheet has been issued. The afore-stated stand has been taken by the petitioner in his reply to the charge-sheet, dated 7.9.2010 (Annexure P-4) also. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered view that no case to quash the impugned charge-sheet is made at this stage as the competent authority is yet to consider the petitioner's C.W.P.No .17851 of 2010 2 reply to the charge-sheet and take an appropriate decision as to whether or not the disciplinary proceedings are to proceed against the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the Disciplinary Authority to take a decision on the petitioner's reply to the charge-sheet, within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. October 01, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE