IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20160 of 2008 SAHJANAND SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The prayer of the petitioner is for quashing of the first information report vide Punpun P.S. Case No. 24 of 2007 for the alleged offence under sections 409, 406, 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case for ulterior purposes on absolutely false allegation. Learned counsel for the State submits that the truthfulness or otherwise of the allegations levelled in the first information report cannot be tested at this stage. Considering the rival submissions of the parties, it is expedient in the interest of justice that in case the investigation of the aforesaid police case is still pending the same be completed expeditiously without unnecessary delay and upon completion of investigation police report be submitted forthwith. It goes without saying that in case upon investigation petitioner is charge-sheeted and cognizance is taken thereon, it will be open for the petitioner to take appropriate action against the order taking cognizance in accordance with law. The application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)