IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.12966 of 2009 YOGESH TRIPATHI, son of Sri Kedar Nath Tripathi, Resident of village- Bharandua, Police Station- Chenari, District- Rohtas ….Petitoner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ….O. P. ----------- 2/ 21.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case instituted under sections 325, 326, 329, 386, 307 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only two persons have been named in the FIR, whereas, this petitioner has not been identified and named in the FIR. Subsequently, his name transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused. The court below has observed in the impugned order that the confessional statement merely states that the petitioner was present and watching the situation while the occurrence was taking place. Considering this aspect, petitioner named above is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court IVth, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Sessions Trial No.63 of 2009 arising out of Chenari P.S. case no. 16 of 2008, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors should be the father of the petitioner. JA/- (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)