,\oa d 1N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION fl^'SCS—/2005 I'ETITIONER smstss /' -.'~>. ^ .^5 'A^/'' .. ^^y ..•••'' . •^4'y/ 0^"<^-/ XXaN-1 •^'.^'r^' .••^..^'y '^'^ '•'"..^ KRSPONDENTS ^'\ /K^ ^}v<^~ '<^y 0-" •^-- %°^s^ ^ v%^^!^ '^^..•-.:^. ':S£t%SS Rajesh Kumar Pandit aged about 47 years S/o. Mohan Lal Pandit Range Offlcer (Forest), Belgahana, R/o. Belgahana, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS ^l. State of Chhattisgarh, through Special Secretary, Forest Oepartment, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 2. Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Areinya Bhavan, Jail Road, Raipur. -3. Shri R.C.Raigar, Inquiry Officer, Chief Conservator (Forest) OfGcial . address - Aranya Bhavan, Jail Roacl, Raipur. 4. Shri , Harihar Narayan Singh, C/o. Inquiry Officer, Shri R.C.Raigar, Office of the Chief Conservator (Forest) Aranya Bhavan, Jall Road, Raipur. WRIT.F'ETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA PQR ISSUANCE OF AP!:)EOPRIATE WRIT/ORDER OR DIRECTION. •f nr r XI-HC-78 HW<^\ ^mq? \.}x,Ti"qi«Trt<(,u>-nl»(i<i<B,Rrti'i-iy'; . .Lv.fp..^.'.:.. '^.^.i..la.y.. STI^ST iraq? ('3crfgcl%) sn^CTwf^titR aaiTan^STipire l.l^s5S-'^:S:^^s^. s^arsR^ifla aT^?T 21.9.2005 Shri Uttam Pandey.counsel 5hn Sandeep Dybey, 5ovt. 8y this writ petition the Officer in *he Forest DeporTmeht, for quashment of the Order da-j respondent No.l-the Special Sej Chhattisgarh has asked respond^nt made in tha compiaint doted 23.1[ enquire into the ailegations mad^ da+ed 10.8.2005 (Annexure P-6). Lesrned counsei for the p^- is not aware abouT the contenTs besn entrustsd to respondsr.t N] enquiry. Further- argument of rsspondsnt No.3 is no+ conducti(ig has threatened the petitioner snquiry, he will suspend him. Havinq heard lecrned |fop1tiepetitjoner. lAdv. for the Sta-te. petitioner, who is working aa fosnge ^, State of Chhatrisgarh, has prayed ^ed 13.4.2005 (Annexure P-1) whereby Forest Department, State of No.3 to enquire into the aiiegations '005 and to direct ressondent No.2 to So far, a preliminary enq| No.3 and whatever noticss ars 'ni<i(w<I1i iiinV^'fs'd '(Rrl'tdl'f ^srt^rsn^CT by tl Detitioner herein in his letrer i+itioner submitted that -riie petitiQner ;f cbmplainT-dated 23.1.2005, which has o.3-5hri ft.C. ftci'ciG!- for conductinq the counsel for' the petitioner is that the enquiry i" a fair mannsr snd he Lhat if he wiii nat co-operate in 1+ie coui|isel for the petitioner, I have perused liry is being conducted by respondent idsued, ths peti+ionsr is at liberty to letl 'S XI-HC-78 \dCTi'«i<<irt<i,U-CT|'M<K», Rlril<!+y'< *ii*i«ia?qTqp 3I1^?T tRq? (ijclijd^) aiAsr^i R«|i<b aziTan^sTditii'b f.^.^.,..-.- ..^ .-:..^^ ^ei&lo^./r ^SE^^-. "^t" ^RITW^lfeTStftCT -2. repiy of those notices and ther< is found then he will be at liber stags. However, at the stage of| for -riiis Court +o quash the extra-ordinar'y Jurisdiction u"d^ undefr- jafter, if sny irre9ula>-ity in the enquiry irfv to raise the same at the appropriate preliminary enquin? it is not appropriats si|iquiry or stay the enquiry by invokin< Article 226 of "riie ConsTitution of Therefore, the petition accordingiy, dismissed. Consequently, M.(W.)P. ^ <pii[CT<Tli ii*<nV^"fs><) •<R|'WI'< ^aif^rail^aT is liable to be dismissed and it i.s, o.3652/05'and I.A, No.8080/05 also Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge