IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.8396 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 11, 2011. Amarjit Singh and others .....Petitioners versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners seek a mandamus for the benefits of adhoc service rendered by them, towards the qualifying service for the purpose of pensionary benefits. The above stated claim is sought on the basis of the order dated 24.3.2009 passed by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.2208 of 1989 (Lekh Raj Khera and others versus State of Punjab and another (Annexure P-4). The petitioners have also represented the respondent- authorities vide representation dated 5.7.2009 (Annexure P-5) to which no response has been received by them so far. CWP No.8396 of 2011 [2] In these circumstances and without expressing any views on the entitlement of the petitioners, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the claim of the petitioners as contained in the afore-mentioned representation dated 5.7.2009 in the light of the decision of this Court in Lekh Raj Khera's case (supra), within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 11, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE