IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37634 of 2009 ASHOK CHOUDHARY SON OF LATE MUKTINATH CHOUDHARY, RESIDENT OF SIMRAHI HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, P.S. RAGHOPUR, DISTT. SUPAUL. ------- PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14/12/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case under Sections 302/34 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case is merely on the basis of suspicion. In support of his argument, learned counsel has produced several documents to show that the communication between petitioner and the informant’s daughter-in-law had ceased much before the occurrence. All these aspects should be considered and may be a good ground for grant of regular bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and allegation in the F.I.R., I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. S.Ali (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)