:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.493 OF 2005 Ali Saheb Husain Dhamaskar ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr. H.A. Solkar, for the Applicant. Mr. R.Y. Mirza, A.P.P., for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 2nd February 2005 P.C.: . Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. The complaint as filed appears to be false as the claim set up therein is belied by the document, Exhibit C, dated 21st September 2004, which clearly presupposes that the complainant was provided employment as per the agreement, but, later on, his services have been terminated for the reasons mentioned in the said letter. If it is so, the Applicant deserves to :2: be granted anticipatory bail. (A) Accordingly, the Applicant is granted anticipatory bail in connection with CR.No. 2/2005 registered with Sangmeshwar Police Station on executing personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with one local surety in the like amount. (B) The Applicant shall abide by the conditions stipulated in section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as applicable to the State of Maharashtra. . Application disposed of on the above terms. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)