1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.680 OF 2009 Kiran Sampatrao Patil and Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. Central Council of India, Medicines and Ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1308 OF 2009 Aisha Siddiqua Mominjamal Ahmed & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Ashish Gaikwar a/w Mr.Siddharth Karpe for the petitioner in Writ Petition No.680 of 2009 Mr.Amogh K. Karandikar i/b Mr.V.M.Thorat for the petitioner in Writ Petition No.1308 of 2009 Mr.V.P.Malvankar, A.G.P. For respondent nos.2, 4 and 5 in Writ Petition No.680 of 2009 and respondent nos.1 and 2 in Writ Petition Nos.1308 of 2009 CORAM: J.N. PATEL & Smt.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE: MAY 8, 200 9 P.C. 2 1. By these two petitioners, the petitioners have sought relief that they may be allowed to carry out the amendment in the body of the writ petition and the prayer clause that the respondents should be directed to consider that the admission of any Ayurvedic Medical Colleges against 1040 vacancies and the said vacancies which were available in the previous academic year i.e. 2008-09 be carried forward and be made available in the ensuing academic year 1009- 10. 2. Considering that the previous academic session is now over, the relief of the admission cannot be granted at this stage. Moreover, the students cannot be admitted to these courses without the requisite condition and the qualification and without appearing for C.E.T. for the academic year 2009-10. Hence, the oral application for the amendment in the writ petition and also the prayer clause stands rejected. 3. The relief sought in the present writ petitions and the prayer clauses are in respect of the admission for BAMS and BUMS courses for the previous academic year 2008-09 and so such reliefs cannot be granted as the admissions for the previous academic year are over and therefore the Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. (J.N. Patel, J.) 3 (Smt. Mridula Bhatkar, J.)