IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.12232 of 2011 Date of Decision : July 25, 2011. Pritam Kaur .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Jagjeet Singh Dod, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Charu Tuli, Sr.DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Ms.Charu Tuli, learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 13.5.2011 as well as the letter dated 21.4.2009 vide which the benefit of three increments is sought to be withdrawn. He also seeks fixation of his pay after granting three advance increments on the basis of the Giani qualification. This relief is founded upon a decision of this Court dated CWP No.12232 of 2011 [2] 8.3.2010 rendered in a bunch of writ petitions including CWP No.8701 of 2009 (Dalbir Singh and others versus State of Punjab and others) (Annexure P-15). Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the above mentioned claim of the petitioner by passing a speaking order in the light of the decision dated 8.3.2010 passed in Dalbir Singh's case (supra). The needful shall be done within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Dasti. July 25, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE