IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13448 of 2011 SUNIL YADAV @ SUNIL KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hayaghat P.S. Case No. 45 of 2010 registered under Sections 420, 406,341, 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that at the house of Arun Yadav this petitioner being his maternal brother alongwith one other person came with Motor Cycle which was sold to the informant for Rs. 10,000/-. Out of which Rs. 7,000/- was paid and balance of Rs. 3,000/- was not paid for which assault was made. It is alleged that the motor cycle was stolen property. It is submitted that Arun Kumar has been granted regular bail. I see no reason for the learned court below not to give the same privilege to the petitioner if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. 2 With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned court below at the cost of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)