1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.31 OF 2011 (Mrs. Ashwini Ashok Chole vs. Union of India and another) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 20, 2011 Heard Ms. Thakre, learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petition is directed against the communication dated 6/4/2010 issued by the respondent no.2 Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited whereby petitioner is informed that letter of intent cannot be issued to the petitioner in respect of LPG Distributorship at Lakhani, District Bhandara. We have considered the contentions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned communication dated 6/4/2010 issued by the respondent no.2. It is not in dispute that the 2 petitioner in the application has stated that she owns showroom property exclusively having clear marketable title and marks were allotted by the Selection Committee to the petitioner accordingly. However, on verification, it was noticed by the respondent no.2 that the petitioner was not the exclusive owner of the said property, but her close relatives were co-owners of the said property and hence, the petitioner was communicated by the impugned communication dated 6/4/2011 by the respondent no.2 that the letter of intent cannot be issued to her. Similarly, the representation made by the petitioner against the communication dated 6/4/2010 for the same relief has also been rejected by the respondent no.2. The action of the respondent no.2 is just and proper and no interference is called for. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE khj