Crl. Misc. No. M-32119 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-32119 of 2011 Date of Decision : December 22, 2011 Preeto Bai @ Raj Rani and others .... Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. S. C. Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Bishan Chand, states that pursuant to interim order of this Court, petitioners no.2 to 4 have since joined investigation. It is also stated that petitioners no.2 and 3 are aunt and uncle of the boy, with whom the girl is said to have been eloped, whereas petitioner no.4 is cousin brother of the said boy. It is also stated that the girl has since been recovered. In view of the aforesaid, without meaning to express any opinion on merits of the case, the instant petition for anticipatory bail qua Crl. Misc. No. M-32119 of 2011 2 petitioners no.2 to 4 is allowed, whereas the instant petition qua petitioner no.1 already stands dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 20.10.2011. Interim order dated 20.10.2011 qua petitioners no.2 to 4 is made absolute. Disposed of accordingly. December 22, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE