Criminal Revision No. 2247 of 2008(O&M) -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 2247 of 2008(O&M) Date of decision : 17.11.2009 Parveen Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Ajit Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Pattar, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana Mr. K.S.Dhaliwal, Advocate for respondent no.2. S. D. ANAND, J. Criminal Misc. No.49435 of 2008 For the affidavit-supported reasons indicated in the application, the Criminal Misc. application is allowed and the delay of 32 days in fling the appeal is condoned. Criminal Revision No.2247 of 2008 Respondent no.2 was convicted by the learned Trial Judge, for offences under Section 377 and 506 IPC, and was sentenced to undergo RI for a period two years under Section 377 IPC and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-. In default of payment of fine, the appellant was directed to undergo further RI for a period of two months. For the offence under Section 506 IPC, the respondent was sentenced to undergo RI for a period three months. In appeal, the learned Additional Sessions Judge affirmed the finding of conviction but reduced the sentence to one year from two years. Criminal Revision No. 2247 of 2008(O&M) -2- **** The present plea filed by the complainant for enhancement of the sentence awarded to respondent-accused by the learned Additional Sessions Judge has to be necessarily dismissed as infructuous in view of the presently conceded position that an appeal against conviction filed by the respondent-accused was allowed by a Coordinate Bench (T.P.S.Mann, J.) of this Court vide order dated 28.8.2008. Infact, it is apparent from the record that plea for enhancement came to be filed on 25.9.2008, though the appeal against conviction had already been allowed on 28.8.2008. Ordered accordingly. November 17, 2009 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE