IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 11425 of 2008. Decided on: 22.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Purshottam Chand Sharma and others. … Petitioners. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh. … Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners : Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous with the passage of time. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 22, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?