$-3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1424/2010 RAM AVTAR Petitioner Through Mr. S.K. Sethi, Adv. versus STATEOF NCT OF DELHI Respondent Through Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing counsel with Ms. Laxmi Chaudhaiy, Adv. with Mr. Somil Shanna, SI, PS Gokul Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER % 26.05.2011 By this petition the Petitioner seeks parole for filing SLP and to re establish ties with his family. A status report was filed on the last date wherein it was stated that the Petitioner was granted interim bail with effect from 1988 and was re-arrested in 2009 after non-bailable warrants were issued. Since the status report was contrary to the nominal roll, further nominal roll and verification was asked for. Now a status report has been filed along with the report of Superintendent Tihar Jail stating that the Petitioner was never released on W.P.(CRL) 1424/2010 page 1 of 2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Signature Not Verified interim bail but was released on 30"" September, 1998 on regular bail pursuantto the orderdated20^' May, 1997 passedby this Courtin Criminal Appeal No. 165/97. Since the Petitioner did not appear at the time of hearing of appeal, non-bailable warrants were issued against him. Further status report has been filed stating that the Petitioner's wife along with her two daughters reside at a Jhuggi in Wazirpur, Ashok Vihar and her eldest daughter is mamed and is residing in Faridabad. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that he has taken instructions from the Petitioner on video conferencing that no SLP has been filed by him in the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The Petitioner is in custody since 8^^ November, 2009. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case. Petitioner is directed to be released on parole for a period of four weeks on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the Learned Trial Court/ CMM/ Duty Magistrate. Petition is disposed of Order be communicated to the Petitioner through Superintendent Tihar Jail. MUKTA GUPTA,J MAY 26, 2011/'ga' W.P.(CRL) 1424/2010 page 2 of2 S II fl" 28# * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI -I- W.P.(CRL) 1424/2010 RAM AVTAR Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Sethi, Advocate. Petitioner in custody. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Respondent Through: Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Advocate for Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel with SI Somil Sharma, PS Gokalpuri, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER % 24.10.2011 CrI. M.A. No. 8171/2011 (modification of order dated 26^''May, 2011) By this application the Petitioner seeks reduction in the personal bond and the suretyamountas directedvide orderdated26''^May, 2011. On a notice being issued a status report has been field which shows that the Petitioner's family comprises of his wife and three daughters. The Petitioner was a rickshaw puller and was living in a house as a tenant where his wife continues to live. The wife of the Petitioner works as a maid to earn her and her daughter's livelihood. In view of the facts stated in the status report, in the interest of justice, orderdated26"' May, 2011 is modified. It is therefore,directedthat the Petitioner be released on parole for a period of four weeks on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/CMM/Duty Magistrate. Application disposed of Copy of the order be communicated to the Petitioner through Superintendent, Tihar Jail. "MUKTA GUPTA, J. OCTOBER 24, 2011/'vn' II