BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16470 of 2011 1 IBRAHIM PITCHAI 2 MOHAMMED ALI 3 JAMAL ALI MASTHAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.3,4&6 Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY CRIME BRANCH(CCB) TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.60 OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.AJMAL KHAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.R.RAMACHANDRAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 419 and 420 of I.P.C., in Crime No.60 of 2011 and seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been arrayed as A.3, A.4 and A.6 and they have been falsely implicated in the case on the allegation that the petitioners/A.3 and A.4 attested the document said to have been fabricated by the other accused and sold the property to the defacto complainant and the petitioner/A6 was only the mediator in the transaction 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the allegation against petitioners is that they were involved in selling a property by fabricating a false document and the investigation is pending. 4. It is seen that even according to the prosecution the petitioners 2 and 3 are only the attesters and the first petitioner acted as a mediator in the transaction. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are having apprehension of arrest as they have been called for interrogation by the respondent police frequently, this Court is constrained to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tirunelveli, on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police for a period of three weeks daily at 5.30 p.m. and thereafter, they shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 20/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, TIRUNELVELI 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY CRIME BRANCH(CCB) TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. M.AJMAL KHAN Advocate SR.No.45186 rl/6c – 22.12.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16470 of 2011 Date :20/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/