1909ao91.11.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. APPEAL AGAINST ORDER NO.91 OF 2011 Natthuji Raghoba Bahure and antoher VERSUS Pandurang Nagorao Shende and another ........................................................................................................................................................ ..... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................................ ..... CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 19. SEPTEMBER, 2011. The Trial Court has dismissed the suit for specific performance of contract filed by the respondents/plaintiffs. During the pendency of the suit the order of injunction was passed which was operating. There is no dispute that the respondents/plaintiffs are in possession of the property. The suit has been dismissed as barred by limitation. The appeal is pending to consider the said judgment and decree passed by the Trial Court. The Appellate Court has found that the respondents/plaintiffs are in possession of the suit property and hence, pending the decision of appeal, the order of injunction has been passed. In this factual background, no fault can be found with the order of injunction passed by the Appellate Court. The appeal is dismissed. Hearing of appeal is expedited. JUDGE 1909ao91.11.odt BrWankhede