CRP 406/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.P.KATAKEY Heard Mr BC Das, learned senior counsel for the petitioners and Mr AK Goswami, l earned senior counsel for the respondents. As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself. At the outset, learned counsel for the parties submit that pursuant to t he order dated 4th October 2010 passed by this Court though an effort for out-of -court settlement of the dispute was made, no such settlement could be arrived a t. The petitioners, who are the respondents in Misc Appeal No.36/20010, by the present petition have challenged the interim order dated 27th September 2010 passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) No.2, Kamrup at Guwahati in Mis c (J)Case No.183/ 2010 arising out of the aforesaid appeal restraining the petit ioners from using banner of Naba Samannaya Mahila Samity , while performing the ensuing Durga Puja that starts from 13th October 2010. It appears that the dispute is relating to the use of the name Naba Sam annaya Mahila Samity . It is contended by learned senior counsel for the petitioners that contribution for performing the puja has been collected from the donors in the name of Naba Samannaya Mahila Samity and unless the said name is allowed to be used while pe rforming the puja, the petitioners would not be able to spend the amount so far collected in the name of the said Samity, thereby jeopardizing the performance o f the puja that starts from 13th October 2010. Learned senior counsel, therefore , submits that the exparte order of injunction granted by learned lower appellat e court be interfered with. Learned senior counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, submits t hat what has been injuncted is from using the banner namely Naba Samannaya Mahi la Samity and there is no injunction restraining the present petitioners from u tilizing the fund so far collected in the name of Naba Samannaya Mahila Samity . It appears from the ad-interim order dated 27th September 2010 passed by the learned lower appellate court that while admitting the appeal for hearing a nd fixing the matter on 12th October 2010, an ad-interim order was passed direct ing the petitioners to not use the banner namely Naba Samannaya Mahila Samity until further orders. There is no prohibition or injunction restraining the peti tioners from utilizing the fund so far collected or to be collected in the name of Naba Samannaya Mahila Samity , for performing the puja. That being the position, the petitioners may perform the ensuing Durga P uja by utilizing the fund so far collected or to be collected in the name of Na ba Samannaya Mahila Samity . However, they should maintain proper audited accoun t that will be produced before the learned court below, if ordained. The parties shall appear before the learned lower appellate court on the next date fixed, t hat is, on 12th October 2010. The learned lower appellate court, thereafter, sha ll fix a date in the last week of November 2010 for hearing and disposal of the appeal. The revision petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.