IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.10412 of 1998 Between: K. Venkataramanachari S/o Peddachari Naguravandlapalli , Gundlacheruvu, Nooliveedu Post, Galiveedu Mandal, Cuddapah District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Executive Engineer, Panchayatraj Division II, Cuddapah 2 The Deputy Executive Engineer Panchayatraj, Lakkireddipalli -II Cuddapah District 3 N.Siva Reddy Group Leader, Aulareddygaripalli Galiveddu Mandal, Cuddapah District ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 1st respondent in awarding the same contract in favour of 3rd respondent in agreement NIL/97-98 dated 31/03/1998 as illegal arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent to permit the petitioner to complete the work as per the agreement No.44/94-95, dt. 6/12/1994. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. O.MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT. Counsel for the Respondent No.3: None appeared The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. _______________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 10.03.2005 Nsr ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Executive Engineer, Panchayatraj Division II, Cuddapah 2 The Deputy Executive Engineer Panchayatraj, Lakkireddipalli -II Cuddapah District 3 Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, High Court of AP, Hyderabad (OUT) 4 Two CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KRD}