AB 2117/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE H. BARUAH Heard Mr. H.R.A Choudhury, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Mr. I. A. Hazarika le arned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. K. Munir, learned Addl. P.P for the St ate of Assam. Petitioners herein are all in-laws of Musstt. Abida Khatun, the complainant/info rmant of Barpeta P.S Case No. 622 of 2011(G.R. Case No. 1324 of 2011) registered under Section 498(A). They all together filed an application under Section 438 Cr. PC to provide them privilege of pre arrest bail in the case as indicated abo ve. This court on 29-07-2011 while taking up the application for bail, was pleas ed to provide interim bail after consideration of the facts and circumstances ap pearing in the face of the record and directed the learned P.P to place the case diary for final disposal of the bail application. Today the Case Diary has been placed. The court has meticulously gone through the same including the statement of the witnesses so far recorded by the I.O under Section 161 Cr. P C. It would also ap pear to us that the Investigating Officer also examined the first informant Muss tt. Abida Khatun under Section 498A IPC. From the perusal of her statement, it a ppears to us that she married Md. Imdadul Hussain being fell in love with him an d at the time of marriage with the said Md. Imdadul Hussain, she was carrying pr egnancy. She also stated in her statement that Md. Imdadul Hussain with the assi stance of others caused miscarriage of her pregnancy against her will. We have a lso considered the allegations made in the First Information Report, wherein she has also stated regarding her miscarriage. But it appears to us that the case a s indicated above was being registered under Section 498A, this court on meticul ous perusal of the materials available on record does not find any materials so as to show complicity of the petitioners in connection with the case. It appears to this court that this court by order dated 20-7-2011 rightly provided interim bail to all the petitioners. In view of the materials so far available in the case diary, this court finds no ground to reject the application of the petitioners. Accordingly, interim provi ded by this court vide order dated 20-07-2011is made absolute in favour of the p etitioners. Application stands disposed of.