1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY & ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1752 OF 2009 Futarmal Acjalaji Shah. ... Plaintiff. V/s. Ramesh Vitthal Shetty & Anr. ... Defendants. Mr. Sohanraj Chopda for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 4th DECEMBER 2009. P.C. :- The Suit is filed on a dishonored cheque and the acknowledgment of the liability. It is stated in the plaint that the Plaintiff lent and advanced a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- to the Defendant. That amount, receipt of which is not disputed, was sought to be repaid by a cheque drawn in favour of the Plaintiff. However, the cheque on presentation came to be dishonored by the Bank. There is an Advocate’s letter/notice which is also received. The cheque amount is claimed in the Summary Suit. The claim is clearly within limitation. This Court has jurisdiction to entertain and try the Suit inasmuch as the Defendants reside and/or work at Mumbai. The cheque was drawn at Mumbai. This Court has jurisdiction to entertain and try the Suit. The Writ of Summons is duly served but none appears on behalf of the Defendants. There is no denial or dispute of the liability. When the Suit is maintainable as a 2 Summary Suit and no steps are taken by the Defendants, then the consequences are that the Plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed. 2. Accordingly, there will be a decree as prayed. Advocates costs shall be computed as per Rules. Refund of Court fees shall also be permissible as per Rules. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)