IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14009 of 2009 RAJENDRA YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 23.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant as also learned APP for the State. Petitioner is in custody in relation to Ghoshwari P.S. Case No. 13 of 2002 for the offence under several sections of the Indian Penal Code including 302, 307, 380 read with section 27 of the Arms Act. As per the allegation made in the F.I.R. petitioner is one of the persons who shot dead Tuneshwar Yadav @ Vijay Yadav. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the occurrence is said to be of night and there is nothing indicated the source of light for identification, more so, there being a land dispute between the parties and implication of this petitioner in the case is false one. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the petitioner is the main assailant whose name has been stated in the FIR. During the course of investigation the fact has been corroborated which is reflected in the case diary. Not only this, the petitioner is also involved in many other similar cases of murder and absconding from law after institution of the present case in the year 2002. It is only after much efforts by the police, the petitioner had surrendered and granting bail to the petitioner will jeopardize - 2 - the trial of the case. Keeping in view of the above submission and materials, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail is rejected. Since the matter relates to the year, 2002 it is in interest of justice or society that the trial of the petitioner may be expedited. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)