1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6500 OF 1998 Yeshwant A Mane .. Petitioner. -versus Ramrao Adik Institute of Technology & ors .. Respondents. Mr. S. M. Oak, for the petitioner. Mr. H.D. Rayrikar, AGP for the respondent. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED: 30th March, 2010 P.C. 1. The matter called out from final hearing. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 2nd July, passed by the Presiding Officer, University & College Tribunal, Mumbai whereby claimed for back wages with effect from 28th February, 1997 to l6th April, l998 with interest. 2. While granting of the reinstatement, the Tribunal ordered to pay back wages with effect from l7th April, 1998 by providing detailed and sufficient reasons. The reasons so recorded and the facts and circumstances, and as this Court has not granted interim relief while admitting the petition, and as the petitioner has absorbed in the services in view of the order so passed, there is no 2 reason to interfere with the impugned order, as the order is made within the frame work of law and the record. 3. The learned Tribunal has condoned the delay in filing the appeal in the interest of justice and based upon that the restricted back wages with effect from l7th April, l998 instead of dismissing the appeal on the ground of delay itself, as the order of termination was of 28th February, 1997. However, an appeal was filed on l7th September, l998. In this background to grant of back wages from the date of filing of the appeal is just cannot be stated to be bad and unjust. Resultantly the petition is dismissed with liberty. Rule discharged. No costs. ( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)