1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.4518/2009. : : Dheeraj Peshwani Vs. University of Rajasthan & Anr. : : Date of Order 22.4.2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. Anant Bhandari for the petitioner. Mr. Y. C. Sharma for the respondent-University. Issue notice. Dr. Y. C. Sharma has appeared for University of Rajasthan accepts notices. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved by action of respondents in not issuing correct mark sheet to him. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that internal theory and external practical marks of the petitioner in various subjects have not been correctly added and this happened due to mistake on the part of respondent No.2. The respondent-college has sent a communication to Controller of Examination, University of Rajasthan on 7.11.2008 in which they admitted that marks obtained by 2 Dheeraj Peshwani (Roll No.8621117) i.e. the petitioner, have been wrongly shown as secrued by Dheeraj Anand (Roll No.8621118) whereas the marks of Dheeraj Anand have been shown as secured by Dheeraj Peshwani and statement of correct marks of the aforesaid students of that college was sent to University. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite repeated requests, no heed has been paid by the University to issue correct mark-sheet. Shri Y. C. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent-University has opposed the writ petiton and submitted that so long as candidates do not deposit the original mark-sheet, it cannot be revised. A perusal of communication dated 7.11.2008 sent by respondent-College to the University indicates that original mark-sheet of both the candidates namely; Dheeraj Peshwani and Dheeraj Anand were enclosed with the said communication. The premise on which University is refusing to correct the mark-sheet, therefore, cannot be accepted. 3 In the result, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to University to issue revised mark-sheet to both the candidates in terms of letter dated 7.11.2008 within a period of forthnight from the date copy of this judgment is produced before it. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/- Item No.84.