IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO. 105 OF 2006 NO. 105 OF 2006 NO. 105 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 243 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 243 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 243 OF 2006 Mahadev Ramchandra Sutar. ] .. Appellant (Ori.Petitioner) Versus 1. Tata Memorial Centre & 2 ors. ] .. Respondents (Ori.Respondents) Ms. Shobhana Gopal for the appellant. Mr. J.P. Cama, senior counsel with Mr. S.V. Uttam i/b M/s. Mulla & Mulla and Cragie Blunt & Caroe for the respondents. CORAM: R.M. LODHA & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 02ND MARCH, 2006 P.C. : . The learned senior counsel and the counsel appearing for the parties agree that looking to the controversy involved in the Writ Petition, it would be in fitness of things if Writ Petition itself is heard at an early date by the learned Single Judge. They submit that hearing of the Writ Petition may be expedited and they will apply to the learned Single Judge for fixing the date of hearing. : 2 : 2. In the light of the submissions, we request the learned Single Judge to hear and decide the Writ Petition as early as possible and preferably within six months from today. 3. Appeal is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]