IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 6TH ASWINA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 3298 of 2011() (SC.1037/2010 OF ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, ABKARI ACT CASES, NEYYATTINKARA) ......................... PETITIONER: 6TH ACCUSED ----------------------- SAJI, S/O MANIYANPILLA, AGED 37 KEDARAM, OORUTTUKALA, MANALLOOR DESOM NEYYATTINKARA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI. R.T.PRADEEP RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT ----------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. B. JAYASURYA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: BKA ...2 Crl.MC.No. 3298 of 2011() APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE-1: TRUE COPY OF ORDER OF SUSPENSION DATED 22.12.04. ANNEXURE-2: TRUE COPY OF ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE BKA N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.3298 of 2011 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of September 2011 O R D E R Petitioner is the 6th accused in S.C.No.1037/2010 pending before Addl. Sessions Judge for the trial of Abkari Act cases, Neyyattinkara. There are other accused also. The offences alleged against him are under Secs.120(b), 379 and 34 IPC and also Sec.8(1) and (2) of Kerala Abkari Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while the offence was detected, he was a driver in the police department having the designation of Police Constable. The incident occurred on 1.12.2004, it is alleged. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the case has not been disposed of so far, his probation in the service has not been declared and it is causing much hardship to him. It is stated that A1 is no more and A2 is absconding. Other accused including the petitioner are Crl.M.C. No.3298 of 2011 -: 2 :- regularly appearing before the court. In these circumstances, the learned counsel submits that the trial judge may be directed to dispose of the case within a time frame. There may be so many old cases pending before that court. Hence, I am not fixing any time frame. The learned Addl. Sessions Judge will try to see that the case is disposed of at the earliest. The case is now reported to be posted on 27.5.2012. The learned Addl. Sessions Judge can after hearing prepone the hearing date and issue summons to the witnesses and dispose of the case but only in accordance with law. Petitioner can produce a copy of the order before the learned Addl. Sessions Judge and make a request for that purpose. This Crl.M.C. is disposed of as stated above. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Jvt