""'s^^ '3~£T'*INId<l, 8>Ti1'H<16, 'fN^TRTy ^ITRi wnsii^igmw •S^iwafta aii^f (Sjngle Bench; Hon'ble Mr Writ Petition [s (Petition under Art.226 PETTTIONER ; Prem Pra( Aged abojit charge) (C6) j?f Constitution of India) |<ash Arjariya, S/o Late Shri JP. Arjariya, 57 years, Sub Divisional Officer' (current ^<&M, F.O.M. Sub Division, W.R.&. Bilaspur RESPONbENTS 1. State of Water Resl D.K.S. Bhail 2. Shri S.L. bivision, Chhattisga( 3. Shr-i Harisll S.R. Bhatiit E.&M H.E.1^1 6ovt. of 21.01.2009 Mr. V.G. Tamaskar, Advoca1j( AAr. Arun Sao, Govt. Advoco(te Heard. This petition is directed agjiinst dated 6.7.2007 (Annexure P-10) been posted in place of the petiti< ^ti^lf<4i'l HW^ ^ 1^st <i<'rt$i< ^r 3ff?pT SH^T Justice^Dhirendra ^ishra) .4276/2007 rsus ((hhattisgarh, Through: Principal Secretary, i^urces Depar'tment, 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh, ^an, Mantralaya, Raipur (C6) ^chariya, Executive Engineer, E&M, H.E.M. IVater Resources bepar-tment, 6ovt. of 'h, Bjkispur (C.6.). isjh Bhatia, Aged about 60 years, S/o Shri /Issistant Engineer & Attached Officer t5ivision, Water Resources Department, CFjhattisgar-h, Bilaspur (C.6.). e for the petitionerr for the State. the impugned transfer order d/hereby the respondent No.l has ner. ^N %^1!<?^ ff^ffyit^"—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000. /. , ^ ~i ti s antgwRt-ti* '^'dti^l Sft*li«st) Pathak/- "S'ST '^TRRTT, @'aly<i<o, IsRTRTy WWf TOiiwgftasB^? Goverjiment orlder Mr, Sao, learned submits that by virtue of interiijn Court, the impugned transfer even after lapse of more thar| circumstances, the transfer ord( redundant and meaningless with| submits that he has no objection order impugned is set aside wi| appropriate orders in the matt^ under the administrative exigenc)) In vjew of aboye submissiort the instant petition is allowed Annexure P-10 dated 6.07.2001 petitioner, is hereby set aside. liberty to pass appropriate ordev\s petitioner in the event of adminis-l Certifiedcopy as per rules. anU •Bl'ilEs'i^-il-t WRft'^ ft%t <I«]<-{K ^ Advocate for the State order dated 24.07.2007 of this could not be given effect to one & half year and in these :r of Annexure P-10 has become the lapse of time. He further if the petition is allowed and the h liberty to the State to pass r of transfer of the petitioner of learned counsel for the State, the impugned transfer order of ', so far as it relates to the However, the State"shall be at with regard to transfer of the rative exigency. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ma<aT*ilraggTORTira:iT7ii<f—FS/9S—11/2008—i,oo,ooo.