2604wp5525.09.odt 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5525 OF 2009 Deepak Shriram Lonkar Vs. C.E.O., Z. P., Buldana & others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Mr. S. N. Gaikwad, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Neeta Jog, Adv. for the respondents. CORAM: D. D. SINHA & F. M. REIS, JJ. DATED : 26/04/2010 Heard. The grievance of the petitioner is in respect of termination order dated 01/10/2009 on the ground that the petitioner failed to submit the requisite typing certificate from the competent authority as directed by the respondent. The following facts are not in dispute. : That, the petitioner was selected and appointed on the post of Programme Assistant (Data Entry Operator)vide order dated 21/5/2009 on the contract basis and the period of contract was for 12 months. That, the petitioner could not submit the requisite typing certificate and therefore the services of the petitioner came to be terminated vide order dated 01/10/2009 w.e.f. 01/10/2009 and the person who was 2604wp5525.09.odt 2/2 on waiting list No. 1 was appointed on the said post, who is discharging his duties at present. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the competent authority has issued the requisite certificate of typing to the petitioner, and therefore, seeking direction to the respondents to allow the petitioner to work on the post of Programme Assistant. In view of the above referred undisputed facts, it is evident that for want of submission of requisite certificate of typing, the services of the petitioner came to be terminated and the person who was on waiting list at serial No. 1 was appointed in place of the petitioner. Even otherwise, the contract was only for 12 months and that period is going to expire in the next month. In the circumstances, we do not want to show any indulgence in the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE wwl