1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.24 OF 2008 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.23 OF 2008 Siddharth Devchand Bhika .. Petitioner Versus Mrs.K.K.Mhatre .. Respondent Mr.A.R.Mishra for petitioner Mr.S.C.Prabhu for respondent CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 4th April 2008 P.C. . This chamber summons is misconceived and not maintainable, inasmuch as, the letters of administration are yet to be issued and merely because the same are applied for does not mean that the share of the respondent is in any way denied. Apart from that, the respondent has remedies intact to assert her right, title and 2 share in the properties of the deceased. 2. Mr.Mishra states that the petitioner has no intention of depriving his sister/ respondent of her share and entitlement in the property. For all these reasons the chamber summons is dismissed. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)