IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1344 of 2008 CHANDRADEO GIRI …PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. LAL BABU YADAV 3. RUPESH YADAV 4. CHANDRAKESH YADAV 5. JITENDRA YADAV 6. SATTAN YADAV 7. BHAGAT YADAV 8. SYED BABU AHMAD …OPPOSITE PARTIES. For the petitioner :Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the o.ps. :Mr.Anil Kumar & :Mr.Madanjeet Kumar For the State :Mr.Gopesh Kumar,APP ----------- 05. 08.10.2010 Heard counsel for the parties. Informant raises a grievance with regard to legality/sustainability of the judgment and order dated 11.08.2008 passed in Trial No.1951 of 2008, whereby on a consideration of materials available on record, learned trial court has acquitted the accuseds (o.p.nos.2 to 8 herein) of the charge(s) punishable under sections 147,323,427,504 and 149 IPC. On perusal of paragraphs 13 and 14 of the judgment impugned, this Court finds that a possible view based on appraisal of evidence has been taken by learned court below. This Court does not find any patent illegality and/or perversity in the order meriting interference. The application is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )