IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5732 of 2011 RAJIYA BEGAM, WIFE OF LATE ASAGAR ALI, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA ROAD NO.3, SECTOR – 3, HARUNNAGAR COLONY, ANISHABAD, POLICE STATION GARDANIBAGH, DISTRICT PATNA. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE JOINT SECRETARY (MANAGEMENT CELL), WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 5. THE UNDER SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 6. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, HYDROLOGY, PLANNING & MONITORING, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, 2ND FLOOR, ANISHABAD, PATNA- 2. 7. JOINT DIRECTOR, HYDROLOGY DIRECTORATE, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, PATNA-2. 8. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 30.3.2011. Heard Shri Satish Chandra Jha-3, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Gopal Krishna, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 6 and also learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Accountant General. The writ petition has been filed with a prayer to direct the respondents to revise retiral benefit of the husband of the petitioner Late Asagar Ali, who retired with effect from 31.8.2003 as Assistant Engineer under the control of Hydrology Directorate, Water Resources Department, 2 Government of Bihar, Anisabad, Patna and subsequently died on 8.6.2004. The petitioner has further prayed for revision of her family pension. It was submitted that petitioner has already filed a detailed representation before respondent no.2, the Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. However, no decision has been taken till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner for filing fresh representation before respondent no.7. The writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before respondent no.7 within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, it is expected that respondent no.7 will examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. In case of refusal, respondent no.7 is directed to 3 pass a speaking order within aforesaid time. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)