IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 854 of 2008 Stay Application No. 7137/2008 Imran. …….. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. …... Respondents Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Bhuwanesh Joshi, Advocate for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Bhuwanesh Joshi, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. On due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; the contents of the F.I.R; the statement of the victim recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C; the fact that the petitioner is not entitle to get the relief claimed in this petition; and in the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any good ground to grant relief to the petitioner-Imran S/o Ali Hasan, as claimed in the petition. 4. I am refraining from commenting on the merits of the case lest it may adversely affect the petitioner’s case at the trial which is yet to start. 5. In view of above, the petition is dismissed in limine. Consequently, the stay application is also dismissed. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 25.11.2008 V.K