IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 19TH DECEMBER 2008 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 27878 of 2008(R) -------------------------------------------- IN IA 1679/07 IN OS.811/2000 of PRL.SUB COURT,THRISSUR .................... PETITIONER: K.PRAKASH, S/O.SREEDEVI AMMA, RATNA VIHAR, PUTHUSSERI DESAM, CHERUTHURUTHY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR RESPONDENTS: 1. PRASANNA, W/O.MADHAVAN, NIRVRUTHI, OLAVAKKODE DESOM, VILLAGE, PALAKKAD TALUK. 2. RATNAKUMARI, W/O.KRISHNARAJ AND D/O.CHENNALATH GOVINDAN NAIR, RESIDING AT RAJEEVAM, NEAR CHINMAYA BALABHAVAN, THALIPPU VILLAGE, DESAM, KANNUR TALUK. 3. PRABHAVATHY, D/O.CHENNALATH, GOVINDAN NAIR AND W/O.SREEDHARAN, RESIDING AT SUPPUKUTTY MENON ROAD, PUDUSSERY DESOM, CHERUTHURUTHY VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK. 4. PRADEEP, S/O.CHENNALATH GOVINDAN NAIR, RESIDING AT RATNA VIHAR, PUDUSSERY DESAM, CHERUTHURUTHY VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK. 5. IBRAHIM, S/O.KARAPPAMVEETTIL MUHAMMED, ARIKANNIYUR DESOM, KANDANISSERY VILLAGE, THALAPPALLY TALUK. 6. RADHAMMA, S/O.KARAPPAMVEETTIL MUHAMMED, ARIKANNIYUR DESOM, KANDANISSERY VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK. 7. INDIRA, D/O.CHENNALATHVEETTIL KALLAZHI, RADHAMMA, ARIKANNIYUR DESOM, KANDANISSERY VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK. 8. AJITH, S/O.CHENNALATH VEETTIL, KALLAZHI RADHAMMA, ARIKANNIYUR DESOM, KANDANISSERY VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK. 9. MOHAN, S/O.CHENNALATHVEETTIL, KALLAZHI RADHAMMA, ARIKANNIYUR DESOM, KANDANISSERY VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK. ADV. SRI.V.V.ASOKAN FOR R2 SMT.S.AMINA FOR R2 SRI.P.RAMACHANDRAN FOR R5 SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.P. Balachandran, J. -------------------------- W.P.(C)No.27878 of 2008 R -------------------------- JUDGMENT Heard counsel for the petitioner. The letter of the District Judge dated 4.10.2008 shows that the will called for is in safe custody before that court in O.P.No.24/75. The said original will has necessarily to be got down for the purpose of evidence on behalf of the fourth defendant in O.S. No.811/00. Exhibit P2 order of the court below directing the petitioner to produce certified copy of the will will not suffice in the circumstances of the case. The original will, which may be got down from the District Court in O.P.No.24/75, shall be returned to the District Court after retaining a true certified photostat copy thereof at the expense of the petitioner. This writ petition is, thus, allowed. 19th December, 2008 (K.P.Balachandran, Judge) tkv