IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 18TH AUGUST 2009 / 27TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 22456 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M/S.SABILA PHARMACEUTICALS, NECHIPUZHOOR P.O., PALA, REPRESENTED BY MANAGING PARTNER, T.R.ARAVINDAKSHAN NAIR. BY ADV. SRI.T.O.XAVIER RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, RAMAPURAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PALA. 3. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. 4. ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR, KOTTAYAM. ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B FOR R1 TO4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.22456 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 18th day of August, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner submits that by application made on 29/11/2007, they have applied for refixing the contract demand, reducing the same. It is stated that although the 2nd respondent has already inspected their premises, orders on the application for reduction of the contract demand have not been passed, as a result of which, they are continuing to pay on the basis of the original contract demand. It is on these circumstances, this writ petition is filed. 2. Taking into account the case of the petitioner that his application for reduction of contract amount is kept pending even now, I dispose of the writ petition directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on the application made by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg