IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH JULY 2008 / 18TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 15946 of 2008(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- P.K.JANARDHANAN, S/O.SANKUNNI MENON, 4/73, KANDANCHEMMARATH HOUSE, AYINKALAM P.O., THAVANOOR, MALAPPURAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT: ---------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.V.MANOJ KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.15946/08 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF the RTA, MALAPPURAM DT 23.9.2006 GRANTING VARIATION OF PERMIT TO THE PETITIONER. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 15946 OF 2008 W ==================== Dated this the 9th day of July, 2008 J U D G M E N T What is sought for by the petitioner is to convene a timing conference in pursuance to Ext.P1. 2. Ext.P1 is the proceedings of the RTA, granting variation of permit subject to settlement of timings. This proceedings was issued as early as on 23/9/06. It is stated that despite long lapse of time, timing conference has not been convened as a result of which, varied permit has not been issued. The basic premise that led to the filing of this writ petition is that the respondent has overlooked priority and granted permit to the subsequent grantees. On instructions, learned Government Pleader informs that this averment is incorrect and that priority has not been overlooked. The writ petition is therefore disposed of directing that the timing shall be settled in pursuant to Ext.P1 on an expeditious basis and following the priority which is now maintained by the respondent. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp