IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7888 of 2011 NIRMALA PRASAD, WIFE OF LATE SRIRAM PRASAD, RESIDENT OF FLAT NO.DRAUPADI APARTMENT, SHASTRI NAGAR, PATNA, P.S. SHASTRI NAGAR, DISTT. PATNA. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAGADH UNIVERSITY, LBODH-GAYA, GAYA. 4. THE REGISTRAR, MAGADH UNIVERSITY, BODH GAYA, GAYA. 5. THE FINANCE OFFICER, MAGADH UNIVERSITY, BODH GAYA,GAYA. 6. THE PRINCIPAL, GAYA COLLEGE, GAYA. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 3. 9.5.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/State and also respondent/Magadh University. The petitioner has made a prayer to direct the respondents to make payment of interest on family pension, merger of D.A. on family pension besides other reliefs. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner, for the relief sought for in the present writ petition, has also filed representation before respondent no.3/Vice Chancellor, Magadh University and same has not been disposed of till date. Accordingly, it was prayed that 2 writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to file a fresh representation before respondent no.3. The payer made by learned counsel for the petitioner has not been refuted by learned counsel for the University. In view of the stand taken by the parties, there is no need to further keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.3/Vice Chancellor, Magadh University within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, it is expected that respondent no.3 will examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law preferable within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If he considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass appropriate order for clearing all the admitted dues within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.3 is required to pass a speaking order within aforesaid 3 time. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)