IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI TUESDAY, THE 8TH JULY 2008 / 17TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 19665 of 2008(N) --------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. TOMY, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O. AUGUSTIN, VALU PURAYIDOM, NOW RESIDING AT RANI VILASAM, PADAPPAKKARA, KOLLAM. 2. VANAJA, AGED 27 YEARS, W/O. TOMY, VALU PURAYIDOM, NOW RESIDING AT RANI VILASAM, PADAPPAKKARA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.L.SURESH KUMAR. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNDARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNDARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM. 4. SOBHA, AGED 32 YEARS, W/O. GEORGE, TEENA BHAVAN, VATTATHARA JUNCTION, PERANCHERRY, KADAPPAKARA DESOM, MULAVANA VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 5. GEORGE, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O. NEPPOLIAN, TEENA BHAVAN, VATTATHARA JUNCTION, PERANCHERRY, KADAPPAKARA DESOM, MULAVANA VILLAGE, KOLLAM. SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. BENJAMIN PAUL FOR R1 TO R3, ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL FOR R4 & R5. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/07/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.19665/2008-N: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBIT: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 12/06/2008 CRL.M.P. 1635/2008 OF SESSIONS COURT, KOLLAM. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// prv. K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C. HARI RANI,JJ ============================== W.P.(C)NO. 19665 OF 2008 ============================ DATED THIS THE 8th day of July 2008 JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair,J. The petitioners have approached this Court alleging that they are being harassed by the respondents 2 and 3, who are police officials. The learned Government Pleader, upon instructions, submitted that respondents 4 and 5 have filed a complaint against the petitioners and they were summoned to the police station to enquire about the same, but they did not appear. The learned Government Pleader further submitted that a civil suit is pending between the petitioners and respondents 4 and 5. The dispute in that suit was the subject matter of the petition field before the police. Therefore, the parties were advised to move the civil court for appropriate reliefs. The learned Government Pleader also submitted that the police have no intention to harass the petitioners. This submission is recorded and the writ petition is closed. K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE M.C. HARI RANI JUDGE ks. ks.