IN M.A.(C) N0 OF JUBICATORe ^l ;BIIASPUR OF 200^?' €• '^rl- i •.L APPELIANT : : Salim Quraishi APPI.ICANT . aged 34 yrs .*i» \ ^aW s/o Shri Sbiekh Nazeer ^W f\ . -alCttf'-' . . ^. r/o Jarhabhata Camp, Near'- ...^•^T',.«ri9i)w..^ Jhulelal Mandtr c(-dlS" Bilasou ;a ^^^ Bilaspur Distt-Bilaspur CG sA--" VERSUS - RESPONDENTS NON-APPLICftNTS 1. Brijlal Vardaria aged 34 yrs s/o Shri Kasiram Vardaria r/o : Bhatapara : Chakarbhata,:Tah-Bilha Distt-Bilaspur CG 2. Saheblsl • aged 24 yrs s/o Shri Dwarika Prasad r/o : Bhatapara : Chakarbhata, Tah-Bilha Distt-Btlaspur CG Hakim Quraishi aged 24 yrs , y;,—s;'>».' a?k-t, ^e.^.w; MBh,i^.«^- r/Q Jarhabhat-a Camp, Cho <<»y-fe4, ci^, C-'M^ Near Jhulelal Mandi-r ,TTi*i:; v;l hf Bilaspur •Distt—Bilaspur CG 'S^ Bajaj Alliance Gener-al Insurance Company Limifed T'hrough : Br^atieh Manager Branch-Raipuy,Chouhan Complex Near 'Rajkumar College : . . • Rad-pur CG ! - APPEftI. FOR ENHaNCEMENT OF AW!U(D ONDER SECTION 173 OE MQTCaVEHieLEACT 1988 CXAIM IN APPEA1 VALUED AI RS 3,92,000=00 CattY :«*., •^"y ^a^. :A'?1-^ a ....<.)./: HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH Coram HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J, & HON'BLE SHRI T.P. SHARMA, J. M.A. 10 ^to. 211 of 2809 APPELLANT/ Applicant Salim Quraishi, aged 34 yrs, s/o Shri Shiekh Nazeer: r/o Jarhabhata Camp, Near Jhulelal Mandlr, Biiaspur, Distt - Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS Non-Applicants VERSUS 1 Brijlal Vardaria, aged 34 yrs, s/o Shri Kasiram Vardaria, r/o : Bhatapara: Chakarbhata, Tah- Bilha, Distt - Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Saheblal, aged 24 yrs, s/o Shri Dwarika Prasad, r/o : Bhatapara : Chakarbhata, Tah - Bilha, Dtett - Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Hakim Quraishi, aged 24 yrs., s/o Shri Sheikh Nazir Mohammad, r/o Chakarbhata Camp,Near Jhulelai Mandir, Tah: Bllha, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Company Limited Through : Branch Manager, Branch - Raipur, Chouhan Comptex, Near Rajkumar Coll^e: Raipur (C.G.) APPEAL FOR ENHANCEMENT OF AWARD UNDER SECTION 173 OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT. 1988 Present: Shri Anurag Dayal Shrivastava, learned counsel for the appellant. ^ ORDER ith (20m February, 2009) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: Shri Anurag Dayal Shrivastava, learned counsel for the appellant is heard oh-admission. 2) Appellant - Salim Qyraishi has filed this appeal for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Sixth Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur (for short the Tribunal') vide award dated 19.09.2008, pa^ed in Claim Case No.108/2007. 3) As against the compensation of Rs.9,15,000/- claimed by appellant/claimant - Salmi Quraishi, by filing a claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, for the injurtes sustained by him in the motor accident on 17.08.2005, the Tribunal awarded a totat sum of Rs.8,000/- as compensatton. 4) Shri Anurag Dayal Shrivastava, leamed counsel for the appellant vehemently argued that thecompensation of Rs. 8,000/- awarded by the Tribunal is too low in comparison to theserious nature of the multiple injuries sustained by the appellant/claimant in the motor accident. 5) For the reasons best known to the appeilant/claimarrt, no doctorwas examined before the Tribunal to establish the nature of the injuries sustained by the appellant/claimant in the motor accident and the fact that those injuries resulted in any permanent disability. 6) In this state of evidence, we do not find any scope for enhancement ofthe compensation awarded by the Tribunal. 7) The appeal filed by the appeltant/claimant for enhancement of the compensation, therefore, is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissal summarily. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- T.P. Sharma judge ^' ry..