NIGH COURT OF GHHATTISQARH AT BILASPUR DMSION BENGH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEBV ©UPTA,GJ & HON'BLE SHRI SUN1L KUMARSINHA, »1. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS: Writ PetiUon (PIU No. 749 of 2008 Puniram, S/o. Battulat Chouhan, aged about 25 yeare, Occupation Sarpanch Village Pandiayat Amaldeeha, BIwk Dabhra, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, ttirough Secretary, Pub!ic Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. BuikJing, Raipur (C.G.5 2. Engineer-in-Chief, C.G. Public W©Fks Department, Bridge Construdton, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Superirrtending Engineer, OG. Public Works Department Bridge Construction Circte, Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Executlve Engineer, C.O. Publlc Worte Department Bridge Construction Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Executive Engineer, C.G. Public Worte Department Bridge Construction Sub Division, Raigarh (C.G.) In response to droDDina the proiect of "Radhapur- Ghuahua" bridae over mand river and in its place startim construction of Hiah Leve! Bridae on mand river in km 2/4 of DhanaaonSahasDuri road. this PIL is submitted Present: Smt Hamida Siddique, teamed counsei for tte petitiawr. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, learned Aclditional Advooate General for the State/ respondents. ORDER (OSUI February, 2008) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, CJ. Smt. Hamicta Siddique, tearned counsel for the petitioner s^ks permission to withdraw the writ petition flled by petitioner- Puniram, styted as Public Interest Litigation with liberty of making a repr^entation to the ;?**%^?;-.,. '^, respondents with a view to convince them that the bridge over Mand river earlier proposed at Radhapur -Ghughua was more beneflcial to the viHagers of the nearby villages than the one now proposed at Dhangaon" Sahaspuri. (2) Permission granted. (3) With the above liberty, the writ petition <s dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Subbu \