XI—HC 78 mmm WWW S.B. Hon’ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra, J 23.9.2008 Mr. Yashwant Singh, Dy. 1 Mr. Anil Gulati, counsel fc By this petition, the appli time to decide the matter pertai of the respondent No. 1 as the se of six months, as directed by 1] passed in W.P.No.3878/ 2006. For the reasons indicatc opposed by learned counsel for and the applicant/State is dire( grant of lease within a period of :d in this annlication. which is not the respondent, the prayer is allowed :ted to decide the matter pertaining to The petition is, aocordinglj six months nom today. i//, \G for the State] applicant. r the respondent No. 1. cant] State has prayed for extension of Ding to grant of lease of land in favour une could not be decided with a period 1is Court vide order dated 27.10.2006 / Sdl r, disposed of. Mishra Dh‘iiendia Midge APPLICANT fate of Chhattisgarh, Through : The RESPONDENT crctary, Dcpartmcnt of Urban NO.1 ministan'on 85 Development DKS Ehawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Versus RESPONDENT ' 1. Rakesh Kumar Shukla, Aged about 68 N0. 1IPETiTlQNER years, S/o. Late Shn' Ramswaroop Slhukla, R/o. Ganj Bans Tall, Behind Eeshbandu English . School, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENT 2. Chief Municipal O§icer, Municipal N02 Corporation, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.