IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 227 OF 2011 SMT. MARCELINA FERNANDES., ... Petitioner Versus CUNCOLIM MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER., ... Respondent Mr. V. P. Thali, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.D. Padiyar,advocate for the respondent. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 25th April, 2011 P.C: Heard Mr. Thali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Padiyar, learned cousnel for the respondent. 2. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged order dated 12/4/2011 passed by the Goa Municipalities First Appellate Tribunal by which the petitioner has been directed to maintain status quo in respect of construction of the house of the petitioner as it existed on that date. Notice has been issued to the respondents and made returnable on 26/4/2011, 3. According to Mr. Padiyar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, the Tribunal could not have passed the impugned order after having stayed the order dated 26/5/2010 passed by the respondent. 4. According to Mr. Padiyar, the petitioner is taking advantage of the interim order passed by the Tribunal and has proceeded with the illegal construction and therefore, the respondent was compelled to file application dated 12/4/2011 seeking interim relief. 5. Since the matter is fixed before the Tribunal on 26/4/2011, I do not deem it appropriate to go into the question as to the legality of the impugned order. The interest of justice would be served by directing the Tribunal to dispose of the application dated 12/4/2011 filed by the respondent expeditiously and in any case on or before 29/4/2011. The parties are directed to co operate with the Tribunal in early disposal of the application. 6. Parties to act upon a duly authenticated copy of this order. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ap/-