IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2008 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 35594 of 2008(K) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LTD., HDFC HOUSE, RAVIPURAM JN., RAVIPURAM, COCHIN-15., REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL OFFICER, NISHAD AHAMED. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.GEORGE(ONAKKOOR) SRI.REJI GEORGE SRI.S.K.MOHAMED SAJEER RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR/DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KOLLAM 2. ALEXANDER.G., MELEVITA PUTHEN VEEDU, AMBALAKARA PO., VALAKOM, KOTTARAKKARA, PIN-691532. 3. LATHIKA.R., MANGALATHU VEEDU, EDAKKADOM PO., EZHUKONE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM-691505. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) NO.35594 OF 2008 (K) ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2008 J U D G M E N T Exhibit P1 application and Exhibit P2 application, the disposal of which are sought for, are with regard to two different transactions. They provided two different and wholly independent causes of action, for the petitioner to sue respondents 2 and 3. This, therefore, needs two writ petitions to be filed. Even for consideration of this writ petition as one, consolidating the two causes of action, the court fee paid is only relatable to one. Only an amount of Rs.100/- is paid. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the initiation of a fresh matter, if necessary. The judgment will gain the attention of the Court Fee Examiner for further guidance. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE skr/9/12