HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.510 OF 2004 JUDGMENT: This Criminal Revision Case is preferred by the petitioner- accused against the judgment, dated 22-03-2004, rendered in Criminal Appeal No.393 of 2003 by the Special Judge for Economic Offences-cum-VIII Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad. 2. The petitioner-accused was prosecuted in C.C. No.32 of 2001 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. After due trial, the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad convicted the petitioner for the offence punishable under section 138 of N.I. Act, 1881 and accordingly sentenced him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for two months, vide judgment, dated 09-10-2003. 3. As against the said conviction, the petitioner filed Criminal Appeal No.393 of 2003 on the file of the Special Judge for Economic Offences-cum-VIII Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad, and the learned Sessions Judge, having gone through both the oral and documentary evidence, dismissed the Criminal Appeal while confirming the judgment passed by the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad vide judgment, dated 22-03-2004. Challenging the same, the petitioner preferred this revision. 4. Even though the matter is posted to today under the caption “For Orders” there is no representation on either side. 5. The point for consideration is whether both the Courts below have properly examined and decided the matter and the punishment imposed against the petitioner is tenable or not? 6. It is pertinent to note here that both the Courts below upheld the claim of the complainant on the basis of the evidence adduced which is quite cogent and acceptable. Therefore, there is absolutely no reason to interfere with the conviction and sentence imposed by both the Courts below and ultimately the Criminal Revision Case reserves to be dismissed. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. __________________________ G. KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY, J 14th June, 2011. Dsh