HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRIMINAL PETITION No.3013 of 2010 ORDER: This criminal petition is filed under section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing further proceedings against the petitioners in Cr.No.270 of 2010 of Kukatpally PS. 2. Heard both sides. 3. On a complaint given by the 2nd respondent, police registered the above case against the petitioners-A.1 & A.2 for the offences under Section 452, 506 and 363-A IPC. According to the complainant, she is the Matron of the Rescue Home. While herself and one Lakshmi Narasamma, night watch women, were on duty, on 04.02.2010, at about 7.30 p.m. some people came to the rescue home, knocked the door and as the doors were not opened, 7 or 8 persons jumped into the premises over the wall and they were armed with knives and stones and threatened the Matron to open the locks of the gate or else, they would destroy the rescue home by throwing bombs and that they forcibly snatched the keys of the gate and they also took away the 2nd petitioner from the home forcibly and threw stones on the complainant and others to prevent them from following them. 4. It is stated that previously, father of the 2nd petitioner gave complaint to the police in Cr.No.22 of 2010, which is registered as ‘girl missing’ by Mancherial Police and subsequently the girl was traced and produced before the Magistrate on 28.01.2010 and the parents also appeared before the Magistrate and the 2nd petitioner gave statement to the effect that she does not want to go with the parents and stated that she would go with the first petitioner, whom she had married and that as the girl was found to be a minor, she was directed to be kept in the rescue home at Hyderabad by orders dated 28.01.2010 issued by the Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Mancherial. Thus, the girl was lodged in the rescue home of which the 2nd respondent- complainant is the Matron. While the girl was in such custody of the rescue home by virtue of the judicial orders passed by the Court, it is alleged that the first petitioner rushed into the rescue home and forcibly took away the 2nd petitioner from the custody of the rescue home. 5. Having regard to the gravity of the nature of the offences alleged and the serious allegations made in the complaint, which require thorough investigation, it is considered not a fit case to invoke the inherent powers of the Court under section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash further proceedings in FIR No.270 of 2010. There are absolutely no valid or sufficient grounds to quash further proceedings. 6. In the result, the criminal petition is dismissed. __________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J Date: 20.10.2011 bss