:'fsSE ^->- RR.N.......£1^^.,........- Pre8entBdby8hl?..^^.<?^t!.a&^1'1 d«ted.^..-Sl£^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. AT - BILASPUR W. P. No. 2-2,S( QF 2006 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS /^ G.S.MAKKAD AGED-43YEARS, SON OF LATE R. 5. MAKKAD POSTEO AS - UPPER DIVISION TEACHER, AT - S. S.KALIBADI HR. SEC. SCHOOL, KALIBADI, RAIPUR, DISTRICT - RAIPUR (C. G.) R/0 H. N0.14/169, NAHAR PARA, RAIPUR DISTRICT-RAIPURIC.G.) VERSUS : 1. 2. 3. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH - THE SECRFTARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, MANTRALAYA D. K. 5. BHAWAN, RAIPUR THE DIRECTOR, PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, CHHATTISGARH, HEAD QUARTER AT - RAIPUR THE GOVERN1NG BODY OF KALIBADI SHIKSA SAMITI. THROUGH - ITS SCHOOL SECRETARY, S. S. KALI BADI HR. SEC. SCHOOL, KALIBADI, RAIPUR (C. G.) WRIT PETmON U/A - 226 &227 of ConstHution of Indja DADTII-1 kF TLJF nn-IT-1/M, HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. 2351 of 2006 Petitioner G. S. MaKkad Versus Respondents State of Chhatdsgarh & ofhera 8B: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. AgaUiotri, J Shri R. K. Kesharwaru, Advocate for tfae peritioner. Shri SushU Dubey, Govt Advocate for fhe respoiidents No. l & 2. Shri Ashok Soni, Advocate for fhe reapondent no.3. O R D E R (Passed on. fhis 21rt day ofFebruaiy, 2007) 1. Leamed couiisel appearing for the petitioner submits fhat the petitioner was appoiuted on fhe post of Upper Division Teacher (UDT) vide order dated 14.7.1986 m the respondent No.3 schooL The school is a non-^venunental aided educatioDaI instit'utlon and aEBliated wifh. fhe ChhattisgaA Board of Secondaiy Education. The serv'ices of the petitioner as well as ofher staff of fhc school are goveraed by fhe Chhattisgarh Ashaskiya Sikahaa Saustha (Adhyapakoa. Tatha Anya Karmcharyon Ke Vetano Ka Sandaya) Adhia.yain. 1978. Though the school is a pri»'ateiastitution but it is getting 100% grauts-ta-akl fi'osa. the govenuneut. 2. Leacaed couusel for fhe petitioD.er submits that tlie issue involved in fhis petition. is, asto whether fhe teachera working iu private schools, receiviag fuU grants in aid, are entitled to revisioa ofpay scale as per the recoiniaeudation. ofthe Fifth Pay Commission or not, This issue was decided by fhis Court iu. W.P.No. 4108/2005 (Smt. A. LaU Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & ottiers) and other coTinected mattcrs vide order dated fi'31 Pebruary, 2007 and the caae of the petitioner is aquarely covei'ed by tliis decision. 3. Leanied counsel appeariag for fhe respondents/State concedes and does not dispute the subnussiion. made by learued counsel for fhe pettiioner. 4. In view of the foregouig, this petition is aUowed iu terms of the order dated passed ia W.P.No. 4108/2005 (supra). No order as to costs, Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge