AB 1086/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.K.MUSAHARY Heard Mr. S. Munir, learned counsel for the accused/petitioners as well as Mr. K .Munir, learned Addl. P.P.Assam. Heard also Mr. M.Khan, learned counsel for the informant-wife. The marriage between the accused/petitioner No.1 and the informant was s olemnized sometime in the month of September, 2010. Some misunderstanding has de veloped between them and the informant-wife has come out with allegation of dema nd for dowry torture. From the case diary, it appears that there are some allegations and counter allegations between the husband and wife and no such solid material is found that the accused/petitioner No.1, is actually demanding dowry and tortu ring the informant-wife abetted by the accused/petitioner No.1 and other accused /persons, who are mother, brother-in-law and sister of the accused/petitioner No .1. In view of the above, I direct that in the event of arrest of the petitioners, namely, Nurul Huda Ahmed(Kusum),Nurjahan Begum, Faizur Rahman, and Swapna Begum, they shall be enlarged on bail of Rs.15,000/- with one local surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority i n connection with Gauripur P.S.Case No. 142/2011, U/s. 498(A)/34 of IPC, subject to condition that they shall appear before the I.O. concerned within 7 days fro m today for interrogation and recording their statements as required under the l aw. It is further directed that the accused/petitioner No.1 shall bring back the informant-wife home with love and affection and live with her peacefully a nd he shall appear before the I.O. once in a week for a period of 3 months. The application stands disposed of.