IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CONTEMPT PETITION (MAIN) NO. 41 OF 2011 MR. SUDIP TAMANKAR ., ... Petitioner Versus SHRI RAMESH GAONKAR, THE POLICE INSPECTOR, PANJIM POLICE STATION, PANJIM - GOA ... Respondent . Mr. C. A. Ferreira, Public Prosecutor for the Respondent. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 9th December, 2011 P.C. None for the Appellant. It is found that the Appellant was not present also on earlier occasions. When the matter was called out yesterday, the matter was posted today to give an opportunity to the Appellant to remain present. But, however, none appeared for the Appellant today as well. 2. I have perused the application as well as the reply filed by the Respondent. At para 7 of the affidavit filed by the Respondent, it is stated therein that a communication dated 25.10.2011 was made by the Respondent to the Appellant stating, inter alia, that no cognizable offence is made out after preliminary investigations. As such, the Appellant is always at liberty to challenge the said communication if so advised in accordance with law. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I find that no case is made out to initiate any contempt proceedings against the Respondent and the allegations made in the application do not warrant any initiation of contempt proceedings. 4. Hence, the application stands dismissed. F. M. REIS, J. arp/*