IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21381 of 2009 ARJUN YADAV @ ARJUN PRASAD @ ARJUN PD.YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 18.08.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking bail in a case instituted under sections 302/34 IPC. The informant has alleged that his father was done to death by the petitioner and his son.It appears that the informant raised the said suspicion on the basis that his father was living with the petitioner and few days prior to occurrence a sale was effected respecting some agricultural land in favour of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner, referring to the statement of Kailash Yadav(brother of the informant) submitted that he accepted that part of consideration amount was paid to the deceased and some money was also paid to him. It is further contended that apart from this, there is no tangible material on record to connect him with the alleged offence. It is further highlighted that the post-mortem report does not indicate any internal/external injury on the body of the deceased. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner abovenamed be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Nawada in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No. 23/2009. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )