((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.688 OF 2005 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.320 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1030 OF 2004 M/s.Vinsons Appellant versus Bhimrao D. Kamble & anr. Respondents Mr.Talsania i/by K.P.Anilkumar for appellant. Mr.Mohan Bir Singh for respondent no.1. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE : 19th September 2005 PC : 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the respondents. By this appeal the appellant is challenging the order dated 20th July 2005 passed in Notice of Motion No.320 of 2005. Especially for the reasons stated in paragraph no.4 of the said order and also in view of the fact that appellant’s advocate has not disputed that there is an award passed for reinstatement of the respondents, and that the award has been ((-2-)) challenged in this Court by way of Writ Petition No.1030 of 2004 and also there is no dispute that the respondent is not gainfully employed any where during pendency of the said proceedings, we do not find any ground made out for interference in the impugned order. Appeal stands dismissed. 2. However, we expedite the hearing of the above writ petition and grant liberty to the learned counsel to move the learned Single Judge for fixing an early date of hearing. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) ((-3-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2364 OF 2005 IN APPEAL NO.688 OF 2005 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.320 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1030 OF 2004 M/s.Vinsons Appellant versus Bhimrao D. Kamble & anr. Respondents Mr.Talsania i/by K.P.Anilkumar for appellant. Mr.Mohan Bir Singh for respondent no.1. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE : 19th September 2005 PC : 1. In view of dismissal of Appeal No.2364 of 2005, present Notice of Motion does not survive. It stands dismissed as such. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)