IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40168 of 2009 RABO CHOUDHARY @ RASO CHOUDHARY @ RAVINDRA CHOUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 12.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Two injuries allegedly caused, one by means of Katta by co-accused Ayodhya Mandal and another by shot firing by this petitioner. Doubt is cast as which of the injuries was reason for the death but I find no relevancy at the stage to consider such point neither it was raised in the court of Sessions Judge where probability of remaining of custody was there. Once it appears that firing was there and use of Katta was there, further its result for considering for bail does not arise otherwise also considering allegations, petitioner’s prayer for bail has earlier been rejected by this Court. Another wrong is committed by this petitioner can be taken to harass this Court only as after earlier rejection order on 13.2.2009 he again directly approached this Court before approaching the Sessions Judge. This much of the act is always to be taken into consideration by Courts while considering his bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is again rejected. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)