IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.433 of 2009 ASHA DEVI WIFE OF MUNESHWAR TRIGUNAYAT, BLOCK- COLONY, BEHIND PRIMARY SCHOOL NEAR TARA BHAWAN, P.S.- AURANGABAD TOWN, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD. Versus MUNESHWAR TRIGUNAYAT SON OF LATE RAM CHANDRA TRIGUNAYAT, R/O- VILLAGE P SINGHADI, P.S.- GOH, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD AT PRESENT RESIDING AT C/O- DHARMENDRA TRIGUNAYAT, NEAR R.K. SINGH, ABHIYANTA BHAWAN, BLOCK COLONY, AURANGABAD, NEAR MANJIT KIRANA AND MANOJ KIRANA SHOP, P.S.- AURANGABAD, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD. For the petitioner : Mr. Fhulendra Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ----------- 2 29.10.2010 Petitioner is the applicant-wife and is aggrieved by order dated 8.12.2008 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Aurangabad in Misc. Case no. 68/07. It appears that on a consideration of the materials on record, it was found that the applicant was entitled to maintenance and husband was accordingly directed to pay a sum of Rs. 2,000/- per month to the wife as maintenance besides a sum of Rs. 500/- per month to his unmarried daughter. It is the grievance of the petitioner that amount of maintenance fixed under the impugned order is inadequate. On perusal of the order impugned, this Court does not find any patent illegality meriting interference. The application lacks merit. It is accordingly dismissed. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )