IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 429 of 2009 Km. Anamika Sharma …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and another …… Respondent …….. Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C. J. After hearing Mr. Vivek Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and upon perusal of the material placed on record, I am fully convinced that no interference by this Court in exercise of jurisdiction U/s 482 Cr.P.C. is warranted. The petition deserves to be dismissed. The petition is dismissed in limine. (V. K. Gupta, C.J.) 24.06.2009 A 2