'•4 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT^ILASPUR W.P. LSLN_0^ t?'2-'^ _ 1 2007 Petitioner .-•'^ . \-^;A^ .^••'^M'..-" ^?:^^"" '..•••''•.Q^ •S.-1'" ^•••- J^ Shyara Bihari Yadav, S/o Shri Bhagwan Das Yadav, Aged about 50 years Working as Forestor, Forest Sub Range Karji, Forest Range (South) - Arabikapur, Distt. Sarguja- (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary Departraent of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, y Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) The Divisional Forest Officer, South Sarguja Division, ^- Ambikapur, Dist ; Sarguja-(C.G.) Range Officer, Forest Range - Ambikapur, South Sarguja, Distt. : Sarguja-(C.G.) Dharamjeet Patel, Working as Forestor (Special Duty) Ambikapur Range, South Sarguja, Distt. Sarguja-(C.G.). TOT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OP WRrTjN_NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI PROHIBITION ETC ¥- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUJ Sinale Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Justlce Pritjnker Diwaker PETITIONER Writ Petttlon (S) No. 8527 of 2007 Shvam Bihari Yadav Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisaarh & others. Shri R.P. Sinah, Advocate appears on behaif of Shri A. N. Panuey, counsei forthe petitioner. Shri Sumesh Baiaj, Govt. Advocate forthe State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTJCLE 226 OF THE C.QNSTSTUTSON OF iNDSA D/- /na n? '^ftrtQ's ^W.U/ .4^W^/ With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally. Challenae in the instant writ petition is to the order dated 31.8.2007(Annexure P-1) passed bv the State Govemment wherebv the respondent No. 4 -Dharmjeet Patel has been directed to be posted at the place of peUtioner i.e. Ranae Assistant; Sub Range Karii; Forest Range Ambikapur, according to the petitioner it fe in violation ofthe transfer policv This Court errtertaining the grievance ofthe petitloner had aranted stav jn his favour vide order dated 14.11 2007. In view of the fact that this petltion was filed on 25.10.2007 and stav was also aranted !n favour of the petitioner, the transfer order, so far as relates to the petitioner is herebv quashed- However, the State Government wouid be at ilberty to pass an order ifthe administrative exiaencv so warrant. With the above observation, the petition stands disposed of . .. .te- Sd/- '— Pritinker Diwakar Judge