IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2008 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 36809 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- R.BABU SURESH , S/O. M.RAMAKRISHNA MENON, AGED 38 YEARS GOKULAM, MANKAVU, KALVAKULAM, PALAKKAD TALUK & DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION REGISTRATION DEPARRTMENT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR OFFICE OF OTHE DISTRICT REGISTRAR,PALAKKAD. 3. THE SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, PALAKKAD. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).36809/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 15th day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner, who is a qualified document writer and scribe, filed Ext.P3 representation before the Inspector General of Registration. Writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to hear the petitioner before any action is proposed to be taken by way of suspension or cancellation/revision of Exts.P1 and P2 licenses. 2. In my view, the writ petition is premature. If the respondents take any action and the same is not in conformity with law, he always has a remedy either under the statute or by seeking judicial review before this Court. 3. In the result, writ petition is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to take appropriate action in that regard. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs