1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6226 OF 2009 Amit Spinning Industries Limited ..Petitioner Vs Shahu Soot Kapad Kamgar Sangh ..Respondents ­­­­ Mr.M.S.Topkar for the petitioner. Ms.Nayana Buch with Shailesh More for the respondents. ­­­­ Coram : R.S.MOHITE,J Date : 17th November, 2009. PC 1 This is a petition filed by the employer impugning an order dated 2.5.2009 passed by the Industrial Court No.2, Kolhapur, whereby the Industrial Court has held that the respondents have committed an unfair labour practice under item­9 of schedule­IV of MRTU & PULP Act and directed the respondents to put up the notice board at an easily accessible place inside the factory for display of the notices. The petitioner correctly argued that the operative part of the order is improperly framed and the words “respondents are directed” should have been read as “respondents are directed to permit the complainant to put up the notice board”. Learned Advocate on behalf of the respondents states that respondents will put up a single notice board in accordance with rule­30 in front of time keepers’ office. The statement is accepted. Advocate for the petitioner states that if the single notice board is put up in such a manner, then the petitioner has no objection. In this view of the matter, no further interference is required in the petition and the petition is disposed off accordingly. (R.S.MOHITE,J) 2 3