IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13200 of 2010 KRISHNANDAN MAHTO @ FUCHO MAHTO, S/o Late Dhanik Mahto. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 24.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 302, 149, 307, 147 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 and 5 of the Explosive Substance Act and Sections 25 (1-B) A and 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner is not named in the First Information Report but during investigation he was also suspected to have had complicity in the occurrence. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named who is in custody since 10.04.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of I/c 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Begusarai in connection with S.Tr. No. 945 of 2009 arising out of Birpur P.S. Case No. 455 of 2000 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the 2 petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the son of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)