IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8034 of 2011 NAKUL YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 05.04.2011 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 419, 420, 467 & 468 of the I.P.C. The accusation against the petitioner is that his brother appeared in the physical test in the recruitment of constable in the year 1989 when the petitioner was appointed. It appears that now the petitioner’s appointment has been cancelled but it appears surprising that the appointment was made on 1989 but the F.I.R. was lodged in 2006. This Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail only on the ground that the petitioner has filed anticipatory bail after five years of institution of the case. Let learned court-below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. With the above observation, this application is disposed off. Mkr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)