IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH MARCH 2008 / 29TH PHALGUNA 1929 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 868 of 2008() ----------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20/06/2006 IN CMP. 2267 /2006 IN CMP.2262/2006 of ADDL.CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ERNAKULAM .................... REVN. PETITIONER: COMPLAINANT ----------------------------- M.V.HARIDAS,S/O. THILOTHAMA, MAKKOSSERIL HOUSE, PANANGAD DESOM, KUMBALAM VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW ABRAHAM RESPONDENTS: ACCUSED -------------------- 1. K.M.NOUSHAD, S/O. MUHAMMED, KILINTHRA, PANANGAD. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. K.S. SIVAKUMAR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl. R.P. NO. 868 of 2008 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 19-03-2008 ORDER Petitioner who is the complainant in a prosecution under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam filed the complaint with a petition to condone the delay. The delay was condoned on the condition of payment of cost of Rs. 500/-. Since the cost was not paid within the time allowed by the court below, the delay petition was dismissed and consequently the complaint was closed. 2. The petitioner is given one weeks time from today to deposit the cost ordered by the Magistrate. In case, the petitioner deposits the cost within one week from today, C.M.P. No. 2262 of 2006 filed before the court below shall stand allowed. Crl. R.P. is accordingly disposed of. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani.