IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21457 of 2011 Ajai Pandit @ Ajay Pandit Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/- 21/07/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named accused in this case being husband of the informant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. However, as submitted, he still intends to resume and continue the matrimonial relationship with the informant with an offer to pay a sum of Rs. 500/- (five hundred only) per month to the informant by way of interim maintenance, subject to any order on the point by the competent authority. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on the event of filing an application before the court below clearly stating such intentions as stated above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the petitioner, namely, Ajai Pandit @ Ajay Pandit, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 85 of 2010, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in 2 case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation or even on single default in payment, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)