HON’BLE SHRI G.S.SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26141 OF 2006 Between: P. Suresh Kumar …Petitioner AND The District Consumer Forum, Visakhapatnam, Rep., by its Secretary and two others ...Respondents : O R D E R : Counsel for the petitioner : Shri O. Manohar Reddy 15th December, 2006 Per G.S.SINGHVI, C.J. In this petition, the petitioner has made the following substantive prayer: “For the aforementioned reasons, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the order of the 1st Respondent in issuing the arrest warrant on the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act and consequently set aside the same and pass such other order or others as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case”. After arguing the case for sometime, Shri O. Manohar Reddy made a request that his client may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh petition on the same cause and also to challenge the order passed by District Consumer Forum, Visakhapatnam under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn, WPMP No. 33570 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed. G.S. SINGHVI, C.J. December 15, 2006 C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J. ks