1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION No. 1431/2011. Santosh Motiram Nanote -VERSUS- State Bank of India and another. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : JULY 21, 2011. Heard Shri U.N. Vyas, learned Counsel for petitioner and Shri Gupta, learned Counsel for respondents. Prayer is, to direct respondents to consider one time settlement proposal submitted by the petitioner. Reliance is being placed upon a communication dated 03.09.2005 issued by the Chief General Manager to all Public Sector Banks containing guidelines. It is urged that last date for receipt of such applications was earlier 31.03.2006, which was later 2 on revised to 22.09.2009. The matter was heard on 07.07.2011 and was adjourned to enable the Counsel for respondent to find out whether there are any revised norms in this respect. Upon instructions Shri Gupta, learned counsel makes a statement that there are no such revised norms or circular. He relies upon the reply affidavit as filed to urge that after 31.03.2006 no such scheme is in force. Shri Vyas, learned Counsel has then contended that the alternative prayer of petitioner to grant him installments should be considered by this Court. Respondents are opposing grant of any such installments. It is, therefore, apparent that as there is no material before this Court to show entitlement enabling the petitioner to claim installment, no relief can be granted. We are not in a position to consider such grant of installment in the light of above arguments. Petition is, therefore, rejected. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Rgd 3