Applicant] WW? éViv?“ a‘.9.“ $w‘5xm Wyw .. Respondent] Petitioner Respondents[ Respondents No. 1 to '7 R. S. Sinha, S/o Shri Kamal Sinha, Aged about ig/years, R/o MLG. 1—19, M, P. Nagar (Extension), Korba (C.G.) Versus 1. Dr. Ramkeshwar Singh, S/o Shri Shankar (Prasad, aged about 43 years, R/o Kondagaon, Bastar, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG) State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Depaltment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) Director, Health & Family Welfare, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Purana Nurse Hostel, D.K.S. Premises, Raipur, District Raipur(CG)v Chief Medical and Health Ofdcer, Jagdalpur, Bastar, District Bastar (CG) Commissioner, Adimjati Tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikas, Ravishankar Vishwavidyalaya Parisar, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) Chhattisgarh Rajya Anusuchit Janjati Ayog, Raipur, Through: its Secretary, 61- Jalvihar Colony, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) Joint Director, Caste Certincate High-Level Scrutiny Committee, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) Director, Adimjati Anus'andhan Evum Prashikshan Sansthan, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla Vishwavidyalaya, Parisar, Raipur (CG) aRTr IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR M. C. c. No. 5 E6 /201o «LEE APPLICATOIN W FOR ADDITION OF THE NAME OF INTERVENER — R. S. SINHA IN THE ORDER DATED 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBEg 2010, PASSED BY HON’BLE SINGLE BENCH IN WRIT PETITION lSi NO. 6554 OF 2007 Eli HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR MCC No.556 OF 2010 Applicant R.S. Sinha‘ lntervener Versus Dr. Ramkeshwar Singh & Others espondents/ etitioner (Application for addition of the name of intervener in the order dated 7-9-2010 passed in W.P. (S) No.6554 of 2007) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. \v.\ Presentz- Shri Prashant Jaiswal, Sr. Advocaie with Shri Saif Khan, Advocate for the applicant. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State; ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 8t“ day of October, 2010) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the name of'the intervener (RS. Sinha) as well as the name of counsel appearing on behalf of him .vin W.P. (S) No.6554 of 2007 (Dr. Ramkeshwar Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) has not found place in the final order dated 7-9-2010 under the column of Advocates present in the matter. 3. lt is an admitted position that the intervention application was filed by the applicant herein (RS. Sinha), but no order has been passed in the said intervention application, as it was not pressed either by the intervener or his representative. Thus, it is not necessary to mention the name of counsel appearing for the intervener in Dr. Ramkeshwar Singh (supra). Accordingly, the application is dismissed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge R P ,