^^ I»THE V3.GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR [.A. N0. /2^3 APPELLANT CtAIMANT Smt. Krishna Singh wife of Tribhuvan, aged about 36 years, occupation service, R/o vilalge Latori PoU.ee station, Jainagar, Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) RE&FONDENTS t-APPLICANTS ,/ ^\\^"s^^" ^ ^* -•••^A^-"-...- ^^^•"" 1) Dashrath, S/o Narbada Puri, aged about 25 years, occupation Driver, R/o Village Parshurampur, Distt. Rainanujnagar, Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. Sui^uja (C.G.) pmvER) Mohd. Rafi, S/o AbdulHafeez, Aged about 35 years, occupation Business, R/o Surajpur, police station and Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. through Braneh Manager, Branch office Sadar Road, near Rani Mandir Ambikapur, Distt. Suiyya (C.G.) UNDBR SECTION 173 OF THB MOTOR VBmCLE ACT 1988 7^ Appeal-'raluedinsumof ; Rs. 1,00,000=00^" Courtfeepaid : Rs. 15/-only.w*"^' w- Amoiint claimed in sum of: Rs. 4,00,000=< in thc Claim.s Tribunal —--•~ t- WK^ ^ip-ll '••S?<(i ' Xi!-HC—78 .4- t ^ST '<<|A||CI<(, 0Tfly'i|^, f^'Rry f^, ft. (^o. 2-'2-p, •51-1. 'J V.WW-111"TOT 'CI TSV.I T.FSKff< ^3tfgt[3n^r S.B. Hon'bte Shri Justice N.Kl Agarwal Shri Ashok Kumar Shuki^i, counsel for the appeiiant. Heard on admission. This is a claimant's appe^i arising out of fhe award dated 04- 02-2003 passed by Sixth Addjti^nal Motor Accident Claims Tribunai (F.T.C.), Surajpur, Sarguja (io!\ short 'the Tribunal') in Claim Case No.35/2002 whereby the claim J5etition has been dismtssed. Brief fac?s of the case ss^ that on 16-08-1998, the appellam claimant was travei'ing on Mirjibus bearing registration No .M.P. 27/B 1682. On account of K]e accident of the Msnibus, certain persons sustained injuries butj the appellant dld not sustain any injury. Even then, the appellanjt/claimant preferred a claim petition daiming compensation to the t Lsne of Rs.4,00,000/- for the injuaes sustained by her. ! Learned Tribuna.l on a ^lose scrutiny of the evidence and material placed on record, recc^-ded a finding that the applteant did not sustain any injury and dismitsed the claim petition. Shri Shukia, learned coutise! for e appeilant wouid submit that some amount should bejawarded as compensation to the appeliant/claimant. <jfn»' "«9^:. /'.^ "% I i ..««•?.,l 1 'ssP^ 1 %. '"i^ .// 'tt:. '^fy •t»._^,^Si' ;'(I-HC—78 ^TC?iI °?! •RFIN; 11S1 3TlS-(" aWN; I T ;, l'si<r!!'M1< yVV./\. Mu. "2-^-o •^rafeTite •WR?I it fezt . ^3iRn3iit?i Having heard perused the record, appeilant/ciaimant did therefore, the iearned earned c^unsel for the appellant and having am of (he considered opinion that not susj:aln any injury in the said Tribun^! has rtghtly dismissed ccident claim In view of the ab(|>ve, the appeai fited by the lanVciaimant has not mer|t and the same deserves to be and hereby dismissed at motlon ^Sate. - - -- - _ __. SdA - N.K. Agrawal Judge