1 Cr.Appeal 1380/11 & 636/10 Tilak IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1380 of 2011 Pradeep Purushottam Ijawa ... Appellant versus State of Maharashtra ... Respondent AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.636 of 2010 Justin @ Sajju @ Pillay s/o Mathew Fernandes ... Appellant versus State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr. Aniket Vagal for the appellants Mr.P.S. Hingorani, APP for the respondent CORAM : V.M.KANADE AND P.D.KODE, JJ DATED : 12th March 2012. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. This is an application for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 14th December 2011. It is submitted that there is a 2 Cr.Appeal 1380/11 & 636/10 typographical error in paragraph no.9(3). It is submitted that accused nos.6 and 7 were also convicted for the offence punishable under section 120B r/w section 395 of the IPC and they were sentenced to suffer RI for 10 years. It is submitted that this offence is inadvertently not typed in the said paragraph. In our view, since there is a typographical error in the said paragraph, the said paragraph is modified and after the sentence “conviction of original Accused no.2 Dattaram, Accused no.5 Ganesh and Accused no.6 Pradeep Ijawa for the offence punishable under section 395 r/w 397 is confirmed and the conviction of Accused nos.6 and 7 for the offence punishable u/s.120B r/w 395 of the IPC is also confirmed. However, their sentence of RI for 10 years of the aforesaid offences is reduced to 7 years. Similarly, the default sentence for non payment of fine for the aforesaid offences is reduced from one year to six months. 3. Order is accordingly modified. (P.D.KODE, J) (V.M.KANADE,J)