In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Misc. No. 12219/CI of 2008 and RFA No. 5679 of 2008 (O&M) Union Territory, Chandigarh ..... Appellant versus Yashwinder Singh ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Advocate for Mr. Rajesh Garg, Advocate, for the appellant. Rajesh Bindal J. The Union Territory, Chandigarh has filed the present appeal against the award dated 20.11.2007 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh. Along with the present appeal, an application for condonation of delay of 51 days in filing the appeal has also been filed. Briefly, the facts of the case are that vide notification dated 3.8.1999 issued under Section 4 of the Act, Union Territory, Chandigarh, acquired the land along with superstructures, fruit/non-fruit bearing trees situated in revenue estates of Villages Kajheri, Badheri, and Palsora, U.T Chandigarh, for development of third phase Sectors 53, 54 and 55 Chandigarh. The Land Acquisition Collector awarded compensation. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the landowners filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below determined the market value of the superstructures, fruit/ non-fruit bearing trees. It is this award which is impugned in the present appeal. Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant submitted that the claim made by the appellant in the present appeal is squarely covered against them in terms of judgment of this court in RFA No. 2804 of 2008 – Joginder Singh vs Union Territory, Chandigarh, decided on 10.3.2010. For the reasons stated in the aforesaid case, the present appeal is dismissed. As there is no merit in the main appeal, even the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal is also dismissed. 18.3.2010 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge