1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR . CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 256 OF 2009. M/S WARDHAMAN TRADING COMPANY VS LAXMI PROVISION AND ANOTHER ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri D.M. Upadhye Advocate for applicant. Coram : A.H. JOSHI, J. Date : 28th JUNE, 2010. 1. Heard Learned Advocate Mr. D. M. Upadhye for the applicant and perused the impugned judgment. 2. Learned trial Court held that :- (a) It was positively proved that the cheques were not delivered across sale or supply. (b) Cheques were got completed by the complainant. (c) Transactions and dues on account allegedly due did not tally. 3. In the result, learned Magistrate found 2 that accused had rebutted the burden. 4. The Judgment of acquittal is not shown to be contrary to facts on record or any provision of law. 5. Appeal has no merit and is dismissed. Judge |mule|