H cp{ 00 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION fCl N0. 5^3"s /2006 PETmONER ^ , ^..•••£^ b^Wc^ .€->• o'3^ }>••' RESPONDENT Indira Mahila Swa Sahayata Samoh- Through - Secretary- Smt Saroj Bai r/o Panchayat Pendri Talab (N) Development Block Lormi Post Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh - Through - Secretary Department of Civil Supplies, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, (C.G) tf'fc ^y. i\^^!^ • 2.Collector - Bilaspur C.G ^"y\g\ _^ •C^_ <6)^o.^> , 3.Sub Divisional Officer, Lormi, t"' \p Development Block Lormi Post o'' ^2!£^^ Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G) |/4.Indira Swa Sahayata Samoh- ^^y Through - Secretary - Panchayat Pendri Talab (N) Development Block Lormi, Post Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G) •e'ii' WRIT PnTTION UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^PSSS/ySS^S^S^SS^SsS^^^^^^^^s. ^^ ^^ ;" ^^^^iS'}::siS:'::^w'^^/!M^^^•^'S^.'^S^^•ss^;^;^;M''^'SS^|^^^s^^;^^^^^^^j:^^^^ HIGM COURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (0 N0.5230 OF .2006 Indira Mahila Swa Sahayata Samoh Versus State ofChhattisgarh & Others Gowri (Writ petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- None for the petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 6th day ofJuly, 2010) The matter is called. for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. 2) in view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. ' ——_. Sd/- I SatishK.Agnihotri Judge %^® •^:"si^ -b /'