IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6280 of 2005 LAKHAN DAS, Son of Late Ram Charitar Ravidas, resident of Village- Khaira, P.O. Nagriyawan, P.S. Khizarsarai, District- Gaya……………………………………………….Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Gaya Municipal Corporation, through Chief Executive Officer, Gaya…………………………………………….Respndents. ----------- 5. 30.04.2009. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no.1 stating therein that the details of payment has been made to the petitioner on account of retiral dues as detailed in paragraph nos.7 ,8 and 9, copy of the counter affidavit has been served to the counsel for the petitioner. Considering the statements made in the counter-affidavit learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this application is not pressed, however, he seeks liberty to represent with regard to grievance which has remained unredressed as yet before the respondent no.1. The writ application is dismissed as not pressed with a liberty to the petitioner to file a representation within a period of six weeks alongwith the certified copy of the present order with regard to the grievance, if any, according to the petitioner has not been redressed as yet. The writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. U.K. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,j)