IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3321 of 1985 WITH SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3329 of 1985 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- UDHNA UDYOGNAGAR SAHAKARI SANGH LTD. Versus COLLECTOR -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: (In SCA No.3321 of 1985) None present for Petitioner MS SIDDHI TALATI for Respondent No. 1 (In SCA No.3329 of 1985) None present for Petitioner MR DP JOSHI for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 03/10/97 ORAL JUDGMENT #. The matter was called out for hearing in the first round, then in the second round in the first sitting and lastly in the third round in the second sitting, but none put appearance on behalf of the petitioner in both Special Civil Applications. Heard learned counsel for the respondents and perused the Special Civil Applications. #. Both these Special Civil Applications were ordered to be heard alongwith Special Civil Application No.2343 of 1985, which has already been decided by me on 25th September 1996. A copy of the judgment of this Court in the aforesaid petition is on record of these Special Civil Applications. After going through the contents of these Special Civil Applications and the judgment aforesaid, I am satisfied that these matters are identical to the Special Civil Application No.2343 of 1985 and as such, same are squarely covered by the said decision. In the result, for the reasons as given out in the judgment dated 25th September 1996 in Special Civil Application No.2343 of 1985, both these Special Civil Applications are dismissed. Rule discharged in both Special Civil Applications. Interim relief, if any, granted by this Court, stands vacated. No order as to costs. ....... (sunil)