^^ ^' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATJ^fLASPUR W.P. No^L\ of 2003 ^ CHANDRAKANT MAHESHWARI SON OF LATE RADHEY SHYAM MAHESHWAM AGED 45 YEARS RESIDENT OF RAMADHIN MARG, RAJNANDGAON. ^ 1. STATE OF C.G. THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, DAU KALYAN SINGH BHAWAN, RAIPUR. 2. THE TOWN INSPECTOR, POLICE STATION, DURG. ^ 3. SMT. SARLA MAHESHWARI WIDOW OF LATE NAND KISHORE MAHESHWARI AGED 34 YEARS, RESIDENT OF 45, VIKAS NAGAR, LAKHOLI, DISIRICT- RAJNANDGAON. ^ 4. DEOKARAN RATHI SON OF ISHWARDAS RATHI AGED 57 YEARS, RESIDENT OF 45, VIKAS NAGAR, LAKHOLI, / DISTRICT-RAJNANDGAON. ^ 5. JUGUAL KISHORE RATHI ^ SON OF ISHWARDAS RATHI AgED 49 YEARS R, SSIDENT OF 45, VIKAS 1, LAKHOLI, ^? DISTRICT-RAJNANDGAON. ^6. THE UCO BANK, THROUGH Pr THE BRANCH MANAGER, SECTOR-1, BHILAI, DISTRICT-DURG. PETITIONER VERSUS ^ •""^^...••*" ..^^- ^^x,^ '^" ^ ^^ RESPQNDENTS i^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 22^ AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUA^CE OF WRITS IN_THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORABI AND/OR ORDERfS). ^ND/OR DIRECTION(S) IN THE NATURE t)F WRITS HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION N0. 754 OF 2003 Chandrakant Maheshwari Versus StateofC.G. & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 & 227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- None for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri P.R. Patankar and Shri Ashish Surana, Advocates for the respondent No.6. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 20th day of October, 2010) 1. The matter is called for hearing. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2. l In view of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Arun