\sk- n'isv IN THE HIGH COURT QF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Criminal Revision No. ..bLb.^j..../20_n APPLICANT NON-APPLICANT .^^s^ ^y^" .^' ^' .-^'^ Shanker Das S/o Amrit Das Vaishnav, Aged about 26 years, Occupation: F'rivate Service, Resident of Rambhafha, Ward No.3, Tah & Distt Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS NON-APPLICANT APPLICANT Minor Khenicharan S/o Shanker Das, aged about 2 years 3 month fhrough guardian mofher Smt Revti Bai W/o Shanker Das, Caste, Bawa, R/o MahapaUi, TahsU & District Raigarh (C.G.) 2^'^RIMINAL REVISION UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURT ACT 1984 vvr wn snw **<!* 'A <yvw^H 7^ "41<11<n'4, ®xi1y'|i»,fi|dl'HIJ,< ^^....C^..<...^..-....^.6.1I.^IL "^ 200 sn^i 'T^T ('pt^ivf) TOIIW ^itor sii^i SB: HON'BLE SHRI MANINDM the 21.11.2011 Shri Manoj Jaiswal, cou(isel Learned counsel for appticant wants to take up settlement wlth the respondent|through Taklng into consideratlor|i counsel for the applicant, this It is made clear that disjl in the way while taking recou|r proceedings beforethe Court ttelow. for theapplicant. |the appiicant submits that the proceedings for some kind of his natural guardian. the submissions made by learned ^etition is disposed of. ^osal of this petitlon may not come rse by the applicant in settlement chl<l[CT^1l 'RPI^ff ^f 1feT^ <Pq^.K ^siRinsii^i MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA.J. M—Ssh"vasuva Slltl-fll flflfl >I!;"I]<KI, tW-IW'll*—FS/140—2/2011—1,50,000. '-p r^