IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17071 of 2011 Tunna Ansari Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03/ 13.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Admittedly, victim has returned to her home and her statement under section 164 of the Cr. P.C was recorded. In the aforesaid statement, she stated that the petitioner played a role of mediator between her and co-accessed Prince Pathak who subsequently, took her to Haryana and also committed rape on her. Admittedly, victim has been produced before the police by her parents and after that her statement under section 164 of the Cr. P.C was recorded. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that there was love affair between the victim and aforesaid Prince Pathak but subsequently, victim changed her stand. Moreover, Prince Pathak has already been granted bail by the learned Sessions Judge itself. Considering the aforesaid circumstances, let the petitioner, Tunna Ansari, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in Bishambharpur P.S. Case no. 56/2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)