IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.98 OF 2008 Amarjit Rajaram Patil ... Petitioner Vs Pandharpur Municipal Council and others .. Respondents Mr. Machindra Patil for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader for the State. Mr. Sarang Aradhya for the respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 31ST JULY , 2008 P.C.: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. We do not find this PIL satisfies the basic ingredients of the Public Interest Litigation. The cause of action, in the facts and circumstances of the case, would be available to an individual from whom demand is raised. Even otherwise, the resolution is said to be passed in the year 1992- 93. Patently, the PIL itself would be liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay and laches. 2. Be that as it may, we are not prepared to entertain this petition as PIL. Dismissed with no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE A.P. DESHPANDE, J.