IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRL.P.NO.3944 OF 2010. Date:30.04.2010 Between:- Sama Parameswara Reddy and others ..Petitioners And State of Andhra Pradesh, through Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and another. .. Respondents ORDER:- The petitioners 1 to 5/A-1 to A-5 are accused of offences punishable under Sections 448, 325 and 506 I.P.C. in C.C.No.810 of 2009 on the file of XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Lalbahadur Nagar, Cyberabad. No doubt, even as per the allegations in the charge sheet, the present case occurred as consequence of earlier case filed under Section 498-A I.P.C. It is contended that this case is filed falsely with a view to wreck vengeance against family members of the petitioners and as an arm twist device. It is also contended that except against A-1, no serious allegations are made against the other accused. Truth or falsity of the case and allegations mentioned in the case cannot be gone into and decided by this Court in this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. It is a matter for trial in the lower Court during which evidence will be let in by both the parties and the lower Court will decide the case on merits on the evidence let in in that Court. As per allegations in the charge sheet, all the accused Nos.1 to 5 came in a car to house of the defacto complainant/second respondent and trespassed into house, slapped servant maid-G.Alivelu and that A-2 threw the complainant’s father into sofa, kicked him on his right shoulder and snatched away cell phones from all the inmates restraining them from making telephone to others and that Kiranmai also slapped and abused the second respondent in filthy language and that in the process, the second respondent also suffered fracture injuries. It is contended that fracture injuries suffered by the second respondent might be in some other transaction and that taking advantage of the same, this false case is foisted. This contention has to be decided only after trial by the lower Court. I see no merits in this petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed. _​_________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J 30th April 2010 AMD