/iC IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA 111/2008 RAJESH KUMAR Appellant Through: Mr.Jagdish Kunnar Solanki, Adv. I versus CANARA BANK & ORS. Respondent Through + RSA 112/2008 I. i I SRI BHAGWAN ..... Appellant ; Through: Mr.Jagdish Kunnar Solanki, Adv. ! versus • I i ! CANARA BANK & ORS. Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG ORDER % 19.05.2008 1. No substantial question of law arises for consideration in the above captioned Regular Second Appeals. i 2. ' The appellants had sought financial assistance from 1, a nationalized bank. They-had submitted a proposal to set up units. After processing the applications the bank: came to the conclusion that the proposals were not economically viable and i . Page 1 of 2 Signing Date:26.07.2024 17:32:56 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified hence did not disburse the financial assistance prayed for. 3. It is settled law that no nnandatory injunction can be issued to compel a party to enter into a contract. 4. I have considered the plea urged at the hearing today that the banks were oblige to render assistance under the Prime Minister Rozgar Yojna. 5. I have repeatedly asked learned counsel for the appellants whether any nodal officer was appointed under the scheme and if yes, what is the procedure under the scheme and which provision of the scheme casts a mandate on a bank to disburse the loan if applied for under the scheme. 6. Learned counsel for the appellants has given no answer whatsoever. 7. It is unfortunate that the 2 appeals are being argued by the counsel without even a copy of the scheme with him. 8. The appeals are dismissed in limine. 9. No costs. May 19, 2008 PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. dk Page 2 of 2