IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 7606 of 2011. Decided on: 18.10.2011 Kanchan Kapoor …Petitioner. Versus State of HP & Ors. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No. For the petitioner : Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. AG for the respondents No. 1 & 2. Mr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. G.R. Palsra, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the petition, in order to enable his client to make a representation to the second respondent for the redressal of his grievance. It shall be open to the petitioner to make a representation within a period of two weeks' from today and thereafter, the same shall be considered by the respondent No.2 in accordance with law. The respondent No.2 while deciding the representation shall also take into consideration that one post according to the petitioner is lying vacant at Tan Janer, where he can be suitably accommodated. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. : 2 : In view of the aforesaid observations/ directions, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 18, 2011. (Krn Guleria)