IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15758 of 2010 Between: Raziya Begum ... PETITIONER a n d The State of A.P. rep. by its Superintendent of Police, Guntur district and others … RESPONDENTS ORDER: This writ petition has been filed by Raziya Begum represented by her father Moulali assailing the action of the second respondent in pressurizing her to withdraw the report submitted by her against respondents 3 to 9. 2. The petitioner claims to be a victim in the hands of respondents 3 to 9. She presented a report before the Station House Officer, Dachepalli Police Station, which formed the basis of registering a case in Crime No.67 of 2010 for the offences under Sections 366, 354, 506, 509 r/w. Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the Station House Officer, Dachepalli - second respondent is insisting her to withdraw the report. 3. When the writ petition came up for admission, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. 5. As seen from the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the petitioner presented a report against respondents 3 to 9 with regard to the incident said to have been taken place on 28-02- 2010. Thereupon the Station House Officer, Dachepalli Police Station registered a case in Crime No.67 of 2010 for the offences under Sections 366, 354, 506, 509 r/w. Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 6. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the second respondent is insisting her to withdraw the report. The petitioner submitted representation to the Superintendent of Police – first respondent about the in action of the Sub-Inspector of Police, Dachepalli. In that view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the first respondent to consider the grievance of the petitioner and issue appropriate instructions to the second respondent. The first respondent may also consider for change of Investigating Officer, if his enquiry reveals that the acquisition made against the second respondent is well founded within a period of three (3) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________________ B. SESHASAYANA REDDY, J July 06, 2010. Note: Furnish C.C. in three (3) days. B/o.PN THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15758 of 2010 July 06, 2010 Note: Furnish C.C. in three (3) days. B/o.PN