1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 3426 OF 2006 Sau.Vaishali w/o Kundan Chawre v. Smt.Ramakantha w/o Sukhdeo Waghmare . _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders Mr.A.J.Khan Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.R.Ahmed Advocate for Respondent. .... CORAM: A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 1st NOVEMBER, 2007. Heard Mr.Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner. The only ground of challenge in the present writ petition is that the appeal that was filed by the respondent before the District Judge is incompetent and the same should not have been accepted by the District Judge. According to Mr.Khan, the appeal lies to High Court and not before District Judge. However, in view of the decision of this Court in Vitthal Ramchandra Mali v. Smt. Laxmi Ganpati Mali – AIR 2006 Bom. 298, 2 delivered by Justice Oka, particularly paragraphs 7, 8 & 9 with which I respectfully agree, this writ petition is dismissed. JUDGE /TA/