IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30411 of 2011 1.Ranjit Yadav 2.Ajit Yadav, Both Sons of Ram Saran Yadav. 3.Ram Saran Yadav, Son of Ram Saroof Yadav. All resident of Village Chhoti Koriyan, P.S. Asarganj, District Munger. 4.Sinku Devi, Wife of Ramanuj Yadav. 5.Ramanuj Yadav, Son of Sikl Yadav. Both are resident of Village Choti Makanpur, P.S. Akbarnagar, District Bhagalpur. -------Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party ----------------- 03/- 17/11/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon/xerox copy of the case diary up to paragraph – 143 dated 30.09.2009 All the five petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this case being husband and in-laws of deceased daughter of the informant, who died under unnatural circumstance. Submission is that the victim died of illness during treatment and though her parents also participated in the crimination, but got the case instituted with otherwise intention. The police after investigation submitted final form; however, taking a different view cognizance has been taken. Petitioner no. 1, undisputedly is in service in army. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger, in connection with Asarganj P.S. Case No. 65 of 2008, G.R. No. 1404 of 2008, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition to petitioner nos. 1, 2, 3 & 5 (male members) to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for three years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in case of failure on four consecutive dates with respect to petitioner no. 1 and two consecutive dates with respect to rest petitioners, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)