IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 72 OF 2002 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.743 OF 2001 Shaleena Sateesh Gothivaerkar & Anr. ... Plaintiffs Vs. Prashant Bipin Vachharajani ....Defendant ----- Mr.C.D. Patel i/b. Mr. A.I. Talegavkar i/b. Mr. Bhaishankar Kanga S. Ghirdharilal for Plaintiffs Ms. Sangeeta Mehta for the Defendant ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 4TH DECEMBER, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiffs and the Defendant. 2. This is an application for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 14th October, 2009. It is submitted that inadvertently the Plaintiffs did not add the name of the Second Defendant in the minutes of order though leave was granted by this Court. He, therefore, seeks liberty to add Second Defendant in the minutes of order. 3. Minutes of order is, accordingly, modified and the name of the Second Defendant shall be incorporated. The Second Defendant shall sign the minutes of order for the purpose of identification. It is further submitted that though the suit is disposed of in terms of the minutes of order, it is not mentioned that the order is passed in terms of minutes of order. Further, it is submitted that the Prothonotory and Senior Master may be directed to act on the ordinary copy of the minutes of order and copy of the Roznama authenticated by the Associate of the Court. 4. The order is, accordingly, modified by follwing sentence. "The minutes of order to be incorporated in the paragraph 2 of the said order and the Prothonotary is directed to act on the ordinary copy of the minutes of order and copy of the Roznama authenticated by the Associate". 5. Grant is expedited. (V.M. KANADE J.)