1 C.W.P. No. 4028 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH --- . Civil Writ Petition No 4028 2010 of : Date of Decision 19, 2010 April Manglam Multiplex Private Limited --- Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --- Respondents : CORAM . HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL *** PRESENT: . , Mr Ashwani Kumar Chopra Senior Advocate with . , Mr Vishal Gupta Advocate . for the petitioner --- , . AJAY KUMAR MITTAL J 226/227 In this petition filed under Articles of the , Constitution of India the petitioner has , inter alia prayed for , issuance of a writ in the nature of prohibition prohibiting the , , ( Director Town and Country Planning Haryana respondent 2 C.W.P. No. 4028 of 2010 .2) 3 No from granting licence under Section of the Haryana , 1975, Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act for / / setting up of Group Housing Colony IT Park Cyber Park or , .4 / Commercial Colony in favour of respondent No and or .3 124 , respondent No in respect of land measuring Kanals situated in the revenue estate of village Siwana Mauja , Dhorka Tehsil and District Gurgaon and also a writ of .2, mandamus directing respondent No to consider and allow , -4, petitioner’s application Annexure P for the grant of licence to set up a Group Housing Colony on the land measuring 15.54 , , acres situated in the revenue estate of village Dhorka 95, . Sector Tehsil and District Gurgaon , After arguing for some time learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition to enable him to file a detailed and comprehensive representation voicing the grievance raised , herein to the respondents with a direction to them for - . deciding the same within a fixed time frame 3 C.W.P. No. 4028 of 2010 After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and , perusing the record the writ petition is dismissed as . , , withdrawn It shall however be open to the petitioner to file a detailed and comprehensive representation to respondent .2, No voicing the grievance as raised in the writ petition and , if that is so done the same will be decided within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of , , this order after hearing the petitioner the private respondents , , and other affected persons if any by passing a speaking . order in accordance with law ( ) AJAY KUMAR MITTAL 19, 2010 April JUDGE * * RKMALIK