IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND FEBRUARY 2011 / 13TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 3441 of 2011(E) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- N.A.NAJEEB, PWD CONTRACTOR, TC 4/635(S), SREEVILAS LANE, KOWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.AJITH KRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PWD ROADS AND BRIDGES, PUBLIC OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033. 2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PWD ROADS AND BRIDGES, SOUTH CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P (C) No.3441 of 2011 -------------------------- Dated this the 2nd February, 2011 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, he completed 40% of the work of "Improvements to Chakrapanipuram-Ayyappankuzhy Pangode Road from KM 0/00 to 3/300" and the remaining work is going on. Meanwhile, on account of the facts pointed out in Ext.P3 representation, petitioner sought extension of time and renewal of rates. Ext.P3 representation is not considered and thereupon this writ petition is filed. 2. Taking note of the contentions raised, it is directed that if Ext.P3 has been received and is pending, the 2nd respondent will consider the same and pass orders thereon. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 2nd respondent, for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ma /True copy/ P.A to Judge