IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-22114 of 2009 Date of decision:18.12.2009. Arun Tomar and others ...Petitioners Versus U.T., Chandigarh and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. K.S.Gogia, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Ashima Mor, Advocate, for the U.T., Chandigarh. Respondent No.2 Sonia Rana in person. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The parties to the impugned prosecution i.e. petitioners and respondent No.2 have compounded the offences and have placed on record documented compromise, which may be read as Annexure P-2. Petitioners and respondent No.2 are present in the Court and are identified by the learned counsel for the petitioners. They own up the compounding. They further state that presently there is no dispute subsisting between them. Their joint statement is also recorded separately. In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.106 dated 08.05.2009, under Sections 406 & 498-A IPC, P.S. Sector-26, Chandigarh (Annexure P-1) shall stand quashed on account of compounding. December 18, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE