1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.716 OF 2004 Balasaheb Ambadas Kadam & Ors. ..Petitioners. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr.M.M.Vashi for the Petitioners. Mrs.M.P.Thakur, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 3. Mr.B.V.Phadnis h/f Mr.R.A.Rodrigues for Respondent No.2. ... CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : F.I.REBELLO, J. AND F.I.REBELLO, J. AND F.I.REBELLO, J. AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. J. J. 16th January, 2006. P.C. : The Respondents in the reply of Mr.S.N.Rankhambe, the Registrar of Respondent No.2 have filed a copy of the judgment of a Division 2 Bench of this Court in Writ Petition 6192 of 2003 in the case of Dildar Hussain s/o Asgar Hussain v. The State of Maharashtra and another decided on 16th October, 2003. The Learned Division Bench after considering the case of the Petitioner whose case is similar to that of the Petitioners held that the qualifications which the Petitioner possesses will not entitle him to be registered on the State Register. Counsel appearing for the Petitioners in all fairness has also drawn our attention to the judgment of the Apex Court in Dr.Ravinder Nath v. State of H.P. 1993 SC 408 wherein the Apex Court has set out which are the degrees which could be recognized after coming into force of the Second Schedule to the IMC Act of 1970. Considering the above, in our opinion there is no merit in this Petition which is accordingly rejected. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)