1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 64/2010 MEHRAJ BEGUM W/O SYED YASIN VERSUS SYED YASIN S/O SYED LADDU _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________ Smt. K.H. Mujawar, Advocate for applicant. Mr. A.S. Deshpande, Advocate for respondent sole. Date : 6th September, 2010 1 This revision is challenging the order passed by the learned judge of Family Court, Aurangabad that the applicant was not entitled to maintenance from respondent / her husband. Her application for maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. was rejected mainly on the ground that the applicant did not disclose in her application and in her examination in chief that she was working as Anganwadi teacher but in the cross examination, she admitted this. The learned judge accepted the evidence of the respondent / husband that her income from the job was Rs.1,800/- per month. The learned judge held that the amount of salary earned by the applicant was 2 sufficient to maintain her. The learned advocate appearing for the applicant now tells me that her client’s job is lost and that she does not have any source of income. In such situation, the applicant certainly has a new cause of action to file another application under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. against the respondent. 2 The revision application stands disposed of. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] ts k/