1 S. B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2737/2008 DIPENDRA SINGH & OTHERS V. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. DATE OF ORDER ::: 02-05-2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI Mr.Sudheer Sharma, for Petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though on earlier occasion, a direction was given by this Court to the respondents to decide their application within a period of four months from the date of placing a certified copy of the order of the Court, but nothing has been done by the respondents. It is contended that the petitioner was waiting for the outcome of the application, but, when no order was passed, despite of the Court's order, he is left with no option but to prefer this writ petition again for seeking appropriate effective direction. The learned counsel fairly conceded that no contempt petition was filed for seeking compliance of the order dated 01.03.2005, in view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. The fact remains that necessary order has already been passed by this Court, on the respondents for deciding the matter within a period of four months, no 2 further direction is required to be passed in the writ petition, except to see that the order dated 01.03.2005 is complied with. In view of the above, while the writ petition is not entertained at this stage, the respondents are directed to undertake necessary exercise and pass necessary orders as directed earlier by this Court on 01.03.2005. It is expected from the respondents that necessary order would be passed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, so that it may avoid initiation of contempt proceedings against them. It is made clear that this order will come in effect, if necessary compliance of the order dated 01.03.2005 is not made by the respondents. The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. (M. N. BHANDARI), J. scd