:1: :1: :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.403 of 2007 Ramesh M.Agarwal .. Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.Girish Agarwal for the petitioner. Mr.A.I.Patel, AGP for the respondent-State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 20TH JANUARY, 2009. DATED : 20TH JANUARY, 2009. DATED : 20TH JANUARY, 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this petition the petitioner has prayed for holding respondent nos.4 and 5 guilty of committing civil contempt of disobeying the order dated 23.3.2007 passed by this court in Writ Petition No.8089 of 2006. The order dated 23rd March, 2007 reads thus: "1. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader on taking instructions from the respondent No.3 makes a statement that action under section 308 of Maharashtra Municipalities Act shall be taken within two weeks from today. The statement is accepted. 3. Rule is made absolute. No order as to costs." . Mr.Patel, learned A.G.P. has drawn my :2: :2: :2: attention to the affidavit filed by the Collector of Thane dated 21st February, 2008 wherein the Collector has specifically stated that as per the powers conferred upon him under the provisions of section 308(1) of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965, they have cancelled the resolution No.89 dated 19.12.2001, passed by the Palghar Municipal Council. By that resolution the council had unanimously decided that the fees of the petitioner in three matters may not be paid. In view of the statement made on affidavit nothing further survives in this petition. The petition is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)