1 S. B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2787/2008 AALAM KHAN V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & OTHERS. DATE OF ORDER ::: 01-05-2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI Mr. Vikram Purohit, for Petitioner (s). This writ petition has been filed raising the grievance which was earlier raised by the petitioner by maintaining Writ Petition No. 1887/2008. This Court gave a direction to the petitioner to make a representation and also gave a direction to the Collector to decide the said representation within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order. Though the representation was submitted by the petitioner, but it is not clear as to whether the same was decided or not and if not, then what action was taken by the petitioner, because it otherwise becomes a case of non- compliance of the order passed by this Court, more so, when an order pursuant to the representation can otherwise focus as to what was the justification with the respondents for not taking up the grievance raised by the petitioner. In view of the above, the petitioner ought to 2 have taken steps for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for compliance of the order dated 19.03.2008, otherwise the fact position remained the same as was existing at the stage when first writ petition was filed. In view of the above, the writ petition cannot be maintained at this stage. The same is dismissed. However, the petitioner is given liberty to pursue his case for initiation of contempt proceedings if the order dated 09.03.2008 is not complied with and, in view of the order dated 09.03.2008, the petitioner is otherwise given liberty to take legal recourse , in case any adverse order is passed. Thus, obvious, the outcome of the order dated 09.03.2008 is to give liberty to the petitioner for taking legal recourse on passing an order on representation. The present writ petition is dismissed in view of the observation made above, however, with liberty to the petitioner for initiation of contempt proceedings for compliance of the order dated 09.03.2008, if not complied with and a further liberty to take legal recourse, if adverse order is passed. (M. N. BHANDARI), J. scd