1 Criminal Application No.362/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.362 OF 2011 Tukaram Marutrao Patil ... APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri Sachin Deshmukh, Advocate holding for Shri Manoj Shelke, Advocate for applicant Shri K.S. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent No.1. Shri S.R. Barlinge, Advocate for respondents 2 and 3 Shri B.N. Patil, Advocate for respondent No.4. Shri S.R. Bagal, Advocate for respondents 5 and 6 ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 25th April, 2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard finally. Mr. Sachin Deshmukh, holding for Mr. Manoj Shelke seeks accommodation, opposed by Mr. Barlinge, Mr. B.N. Patil and Mr. S.R. Bagal for respective respondents. My attention is invited to the prayers in the application, wherein undesired and unethical prayers are made, to terminate the bail, which is illustrated that Sessions Trial No.4/2011 is already disposed of on 31.8.2001, wherein respondent No.4 Chandrakant Sudam Ambhore and respondent 2 Criminal Application No.362/2011 No.5 Gyanoji Mahadji Shelke are acquitted. Still, cancellation is sought. So far as respondent Nos.2, 3 and 7 are concerned, the conviction in the said Sessions Trial No.4/2011 itself is stayed by this Court. 2. The applicant Tukaram Marotrao Patil was directed to remain present today, however absent. The falacity in the application seeking cancellation, making several prayers is itself an exercise in disguise to harass, humiliate the respondents in the present petition. Calculated move is made by the present application. Consequently, since the application itself lacks merits, dismissed. However, the applicant Tukaram Marotrao Patil shall pay an amount of Rs.2000/- (Rupees two thousand) to each of the respondents 2 to 7 in the application. Such amount to be paid up to 30th June 2011. Failure, necessary action would be taken against him. Application finally disposed of. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/cri362.11