1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 5875/07 (Banshi Lal and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 07/12/2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. P.S.Chundawat for the petitioners. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and challan papers and police investigation diary. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the bail application filed by petitioners NO.1 Banshi Lal and petitioner NO.2 Shanker Lal at this stage. The bail application filed by the petitioners No.1 Banshi Lal and petitioner No.2 Shanker Lal is therefore, dismissed as not pressed. However, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that no specific injury has been assigned to petitioner NO.3 Lasu, and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner No.3 Lasu on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. filed by petitioner NO.3 Lasu is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Lasu S/o Shri Jeeva Ahari be released on bail in FIR No. 307/07 P.S. 2 Bicchiwara, district Dungarpur, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP