IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 23RD OCTOBER 2009 / 1ST KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 30007 of 2009(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ATTUPURAM JAYARAJAN NAMBOODIRI S/O.NARAYANAN NAMBOODIRI, AGED 37 YEARS, KANHIRAPOYIL POST, VIA NILESHWAR, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA SRI.ANEESH JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD CALICUT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD,CALICUT . 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD,NILESHWAR, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 4. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER SREE PILICODE RAYRAMANGALAM BHAGAVATHY TEMPLE VIA TRIKKARIPUR, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 5. THE TRUSTEE BOARD, SREE PILICODE RAYRAMANGALAM BHAGAVATHY TEMPLE VIA TRIKKARIPUR, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 6. SRI.PULIM PAYILLATH SURESH NAMBOODIRI MELSANTHI, SREE PILICODE RAYRAMANGALAM BHAGAVATHY TEMPLE, VIA TRIKKARIPUR, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN,SC,MALABAR DEVASWOM FOR R1 TO 3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.30007 OF 2009 (U) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner is regarding the appointment of the 6th respondent as Melsanthi under the 5th respondent on a permanent basis. Though the appointment was made as early as in 2003, petitioner submits that prior to that he was working under the 5th respondent on a temporary basis and that the appointment of the 6th respondent was without issuing any notification or selection process. It is seen that the petitioner has filed Ext.P4 complaint before the 2nd respondent. 2 Although several complaints on merits on the validity of appointment of the 6th respondent has been raised in this writ petition, having regard to the pendency of Ext.P4 before the 2nd respondent who has also revisional power under the Act, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P4 with notice to the petitioner and respondents 5 and 6, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 3 months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. It is clarified that it WPC .No.30007/09 :2 : will be open to the petitioner to make supplementary representation before the 2nd respondent. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/