IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2501 of 2010 SARVESH CHOUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 23.03.2010 Heard Mr. Sumant Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rajnish Kant, leanred counsel for the informant and Mr. Ramesh Chandra, learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sadar P.S.Case No.383 of 2008 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 447, 379, 307, 324, 323, 427 and 506 of the I.P.C. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there are a case and counter case from both sides. He further submits that both sides have sustained injuries on their person, and in fact, petitioner was himself injured and land dispute is going on between the parties. Even title suit is also pending. Learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. He submits that there is allegation of assault against the petitioner. Be that at it may, in view of the fact that there are 2 case and counter case and both sides have sustained injuries, let the petitioner abovenamed, in the even of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks from today be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.383 of 2008 subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. V.K. Pandey (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)