1 Ash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 160 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1171 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri P.K. Dhakephalkar, Sr. Advocate along with Shri Firdous M. Pavri i/by M/s. Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt and Caroe for the Petitioners. Shri R.M. Patne, AGP for the State. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2010 P.C.: . The review petition was dismissed in the morning as the counsel who appeared declined to argue the matter. At the oral request of the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the review petitioners, the review petition is restored. 2. Heard learned Senior Counsel appearing for the review petitioners. In short, the contention raised by the review petitioners is that the judgment of this Court is 2 erroneous. This cannot be a ground for review. There is no error apparent on the face of record pointed out. Hence, the review petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA, J)