IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.917 of 2008 Angad Vithalrao Jadhav ..Applicant. Vs. Rajendra Devidas Jadhav & Anr ..Respondents. Ms Pranali Kakade, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr S. S. Pednekar, A.P.P. State/Respondent No.2. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. DATED : 28.04.2008. DATED : 28.04.2008. DATED : 28.04.2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Perused application and the material available on record. 3. No case is made out to interfere with the order dated 27.7.2006 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 304 of 2006 by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Pune. Apart from this, even the Revision Petition would not be maintainable since it is interlocutory order. (V.C.DAGA,J) (V.C.DAGA,J) (V.C.DAGA,J)