IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6145 of 2009 PRABHAKAR MAHTO, SON OF LATE JAGANNATH MAHTO, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA – HASANPUR SURAT, POLICE STATION PATORY, DISTRICT - SAMASTIPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA 4. THE REGISTRAR, L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA ----------- 2. 15.05.2009 The grievance of the petitioner is that although the petitioner is retired as Reader from the service of the respondent- University on 31st of May 2005, he has not received retiral dues and difference of salary on account of revision of pay as yet. Learned counsel for the University submits, that the grievance of the petitioner shall be looked into without delay. In this view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner proposes to file representation before the respondent no. 3, highlighting his grievance regarding payment of retiral dues with statutory interest thereon which has not been redressed as yet. In case such representation is filed within a period of four weeks - 2 - alongwith certified copy of the present order, the respondent no. 3. shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)