IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 11989 of 2010 Date of Decision: 12.7.2010 M/s Surya Steel Industries ....Petitioner. Versus Commissioner, Central Excise, Chandigarh ...Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Gaurav Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This petition has been filed against the interim order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (in short “the Tribunal”) declining the prayer of the petitioner for waiver of interest and amount exceeding 25% of the penalty, for hearing the appeal. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. There are observations in the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) that the petitioner was party to evasion of duty. The Tribunal has recorded that no prima facie case was made out for stay of the order regarding payment of interest or the amount of penalty beyond 25%. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may not be liable for the penalty and the interest. He places reliance upon a judgment of this Court in Commissioner of Central CWP No. 11989 of 2010 -2- Excise, Delhi-III v. Maruti Udyog Limited, 2007 (214) ELT 173 (P&H). 5. We are unable to accept the submission. Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, this Court is not to weigh merits of the case in golden scales in a petition against interim order. The matter is pending before the Tribunal and is yet to be adjudicated on merits. There is no ground to interfere on the issue of waiver of interest or penalty beyond 25%. Order of this Court in Maruti Udyog is distinguishable being on individual facts when on appeal filed by the Department, this Court found that no substantial question of law arose in that case. 6. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE July 12, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE