IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ No.803 of 2011 Usha Devi Versus The State Of Bihar & Anrs. ---------------------------------- 3. 18.10.2011 Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State which has been taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as counsel for the State. From para-6 of the counter affidavit, it is evident that State had categorically stated that no seizure of bus was made for procurement of attendance of accused Kundan Singh rather buses which were lying at bus stand was taken care of only for its protection and it was handed over to Anil Kumar, son-in-law of the petitioner. When there happens to be clear cut disclosure on behalf of the State that the buses were not seized in connection with any case then the instant petition filed on behalf of the petitioner claiming release of the bus, does not arise. Therefore, the petition is found to be devoid of merit and is accordingly, rejected. However, as per para-7 the buses were given to the custody by the police, therefore, the concerned police official will ensure proper handing over of the buses to the petitioner at the earliest. Ravi/- (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)