( 1 ) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETN. NO.155/2009 (Subhash Chandra S/o Ramraj Singh -vs- Khandelwal Kamgar Audhyogik Credit Coop.& oths.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Tambe, counsel for the petitioner. Shri K.V. Thomas for respondents No.1 and 2. Mrs.Wandile, A.G.P. for respondent No.3. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : DECEMBER 11, 2009. 1) Heard Shri Tambe, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri K.V. Thomas, learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 and also heard Mrs. Wandile, learned A.G.P. for respondent No.3. 2) On hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the impugned order passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar on 28/07/2008, it appears that the Divisional Joint Registrar did not commit any error in dismissing the revision application filed by the petitioner and confirming the recovery certificate issued against the petitioner. The Divisional Joint Commissioner considered each and every aspect of the matter and adverted its mind to the facts of the case before recording finding that the recovery ( 2 ) certificate was not liable to be set aside. Since the findings recorded by the Divisional Joint Registrar, are pure finding of facts based on a proper appreciation of the material on record, they call for no interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction. 3) In the result the writ petition fails and is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE KHUNTE