THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDARIAH REW.CMP.NO.7713 OF 2006 IN CRP.NO.4620 OF 2005, REW.CMP.NO.7714 OF 2006 IN CRP.NO.4988 OF 2005, REW.CMP.NO.7711 OF 2006 IN CRP.NO.4122 OF 2005 AND REW.CMP.NO.7712 OF 2006 IN CRP.NO.4253 OF 2005 COMMON ORDER As the subject matter is connected and this court disposed of C.R.P.Nos.4122 and 4253 of 2005 by common order dated 19.9.2006, and C.R.P. 4620 of 2005 and 4988 of 2005 by common order dated 19.9.2006 , these review petitions are also disposed by this common order for the sake of convenience. 2. The appeals filed by the review petitioners before the Joint Collector, Mahabubnagar for deletion of their names in the Tenancy Register over the lands in question, were allowed by the impugned order. Challenging the same, the purchasers of the land in dispute from the successors of the original pattadars and the land holders, filed respective revisions stating that they were not given opportunity and the original protected tenants were given alternative lands in lieu of surrender of lands over which the tenants were given P.T. rights. 3. This court by impugned common orders in the revisions found that though notices were served on the respondents they did not choose to appear and contest the revisions and further holding that as the revision petitioners were not given opportunity of being heard, set aside the impugned order passed by the Joint Collector and directed to dispose of the matters afresh in accordance with law after affording opportunities to all the parties. 4. The impugned orders are dated 19.9.2006 and this court did not grant any stay and further no error apparent on the face of the record or any other ground is pointed out for invoking the review jurisdiction under Order 47, Rule 1 of C.P.C. In these circumstances, I do not find any merit in the review petitions and they are dismissed. No costs. AVS ------------------------------- 25—02—2010