PETITIONER :— Sapan alias Munna son of Uday Bhan / Singh, raged about 4O years, R/o Chingrajpara, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District Biiaspur [C.G.] NON-CLAIMANT( NON APPLICANT VERSUS RESPONDENT :~ d; Jivrakhan Yadav S/o late Dujram Yadav, aged about 26 years, R/o Village~ Nirtu, {Tim P.S. Sarkancja, i’qrtsidm Di (rgéme'r rict Biiaspur Lqsow [C.G. Cow-LE” . , ‘1’ m2 CLAIMANT PPLICAN-rwwmqwoiwia ‘ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227/ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE. OF APPROPRIATE WRITISI ORDERISL DIRECTIONISI TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER By way of this writ petition med under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has chattenged the legality, validity and propriety of the order dated 6.10.2006 passed in Case o. 215NV.C.A/04 pending before the Labour Court, Bilaspur. By the aforesaid order, th Labour Court has denied to receive the document on record tiled by the pettioner/non-claimant saying that he had entered into an agreement to sell the dairy orm to another person. A copy of document has been shown to me also. The document is not a registered document. The Labour Court has said that this do ument is not relevant for the purpose of claim tiled by the respondent. Admittedly, the respondent h s tiled the petition for compensation under the provisions of Workmen's Compen ation Act, 1923 and he alleged that he was working in the dairy—form of the pet ioner. The petitioner has denied about having any such dairy form in Para- 2 & 3 of his written statement but no categorical denial is there that he was holdi g the ownership of the said dairy form at a particular time and ultimately on a articular day he transferred/agreed to sell the same to some other person. ln ab ence of pleadings to such effect, the Labour Court has rightly refused to accept the aforesaid document on record tiled by the petitioner. There appears to be no ille ality in the order passed by the Labour Court The petition has no merits the same is dismissed in limin a e. XI—HC—22 3aW, Wm,W Wm kmco Mo. 5973 2mg; m E 200 m 311W ah‘r m 311%:1 m Hf’z'a m mm? 111% Wm:W £r‘WW a:Wm K 10.1 1 .2006 Shri M.K. Bhaduri, counsel f r the petitioner. Heard on admission.