CWP (T) No. 7401 of 2008. 31.08.2009 Present: Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents. The petitioner is seeking regularization from an anterior date. A bare perusal of the instructions issued by the State of Himachal Pradesh pursuant to the judgment in ‘Mool Raj Upadhyay Vs. State of H.P. 1994 Supplement 2 SCC 316’ pre-supposes that there should be vacancies. In the present case, it is specifically stated in the reply that no vacancies were available in the year, 1995. The petitioner was regularized after creation of vacancies in the year, 1997. There is no illegality in the order whereby the petitioner has been regularized in the year, 1997. In view of the observation made hereinabove, the petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge August 31, 2009. bhupender