T '-HC—7S 'S^ ^ww^, ©nl^'is,fs|<yii'Mli,< *<1*1CTI ^iNl^a WI, 200 sw^y w l<;-i WISII^T *li<ti sv^V 'TSV (xpf3^T) TCiiwaferaHi^r et>Nfd^l'1 HIH<^* "^f Is^l <F<l-t$K ^Tsifinafi^l ite-i SINGLE BENCH: HONtt-E MR. JUSTTCE DHIRENDRA MISHRA W.P. tel N0.26968008 (Petition under Artict^ 226 ofthe Constttution of India) PETITI(»IER RESPONDENTS Vs A.R. J^ry, S/o Trtlochan Jery, Aged about 42 years, |R/o House No.G-8, Irrigatiw Colony, Near IV(arine Drive School, Ambikapur (CG) 1. Stat^ of Chhattisgarh- through the Secretafy, Wafc Rai^ 2.The| 3. Smt. AmU 09.08.2W8 Mr. P. DhAfakar, Sr. Adw; the petiUoner. Mr. Satish Gupta, Govt. Heard. Grievance of e petitil accommodatton when he was d Subsequently, he vras s| ir Resources Department, DKS Bhavan, iir(C.G) Sotlector, Surgi^a, Ambikapur (C.G.) Urmila Gupta, First Ch/U Judge, Class-11, teapur (CG) cate with Mr. P.R. Patankar, Ach/ocate fbr ^dvocate for the State. >ner is ttiat he was aBotted govemment osted at Ambikapur. 'nt on deputation to Kusmi. He did not shift his family as his children wer^ pureuing their ^udies at Ambikapur and Kusmi is naxaHite effected aresl; The respondente have |allott«jthe above accommodation to the respondent No.3 and the pe|Ht!oner has been diret^d to vacate the accommodation in question The accommodatfon in question is T" ssfisy^,, ^••~"sii 'i!k t€" ~;s ^ ^s-^.. 1 ^iSEjS-., 1 •'"WSc^, j t J i^ ^i^ fs .^-sssf-" e^ !'?5;si'?-Si-HC—78 sv^s w h-v'* ^V 3TI^T sii+iich ^/ s ~3^ ^ww^, ynly'is, fs|diy^< H11CTI g,^|q,"-"- ••••—•••—•••—•- ••••^^200 3n^TT^P (lici^«i<':T) T^nwafet sii^i ^z excluswely for officere/employ^< same could not be atotted to On the ofter hand, W submits that after posting of th^ no legal right to retain the al] instant petition is not malntainat>li At this juncture, leamejd petittoner may be permitted authorities for allowing him to r^t some time, so ttiat he may| accommodaBon at Ambikapur 1|or Taking Into consideratioti the instant petition is dispos^d petitioner to make representati( the petitfoner yays for some| enabte him to arrange for may be considered sympathetif Certified copy as per rul^s cr>i<i[ci<fti ^iTR^ff ^f fst3t <f<i'^.i< ^aifin sii^i y^w of e trrigation Department and the r^spondent No^3. 4amed counsel for the respondentfState i^ petiUoner on deputatton at Kusmi, he has lotted accommodation, and therefore, ttie nat>le. counsel for the petftioner submHs that (o make repr^entation to Nie concemed r^tain the disputed Govt. accommodation for be abte to arrange suitabte atternative lorest area. the facts and circumstences ofthe case, as not msrintainrtrfe vnth liberiy to the frn to Ifte concemed authoriUes. However, if 1 time for vacating the aaommodation to suitabte accommodaflon, tte same sally by the concemed authorities. altetnat'ive Sd/- \ i DhirendraMishra Judge Iffll'1"