IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2756 of 2003 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- PARMAR JITENDRA DHANABHAI Versus GUJARAT ELECTRICITY BOARD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 2756 of 2003 MR TR MISHRA for Petitioner No. 1-10 MR SP HASURKAR for Respondent No. 1 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI Date of decision: 24/09/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT Learned Advocate Mr. T.R. Mishra appearing for the petitioners submits that the respondents, since filing of the petition, have already appointed all except one. He submits that the respondents have, through oversight, not given the same treatment to one of the petitioners. It is provided that the said left out petitioner shall make a representation to the respondents for being given treatment similar to other petitioners. In case his case is found on all points identical to other petitioners, the respondents shall examine his case and it is expected that he will also be given the same treatment. With these observations and directions, the petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. (Akil Kureshi, J.) */Mohandas