c f.l"01 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 36^6 /2005 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^^y Ku. Indrawati, D/o Ramkumar, aged 21 years, R/o village Govindpur, [Kenapara] Tah. Surajpur, District Surguja [C.G.J. VERSUS <? 1] State of Chhattisgarh, th ro u g h Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.] 2] The Chief Executive Officer, Janpand Panchayat, Ramanuj Nagar, Tah. Surajpur, District Surguja [C.G.]. 3] Block Education Officer, Ramanuj Nagar, District Surguja [C.G.]. 4] Pradhan Pathak, Shiksha Guarantee Shala, Kenapara, Govindpur, District Surguja [C.G.]. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/277 OF CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA l"ni>, f !». 'a-"1-''^" %^^XI.HC-78 ' sn^y w f?-ii%" W 3WI »1|i* *nwfT»Mi^» '3^ -*iw{w<i, 9v\w' , hwmy. ..^:£..Us,...3(&.lfij ••^2005 sn^Tira^ (yil^'sfq'i) TOnwnfeia^ S.B: Hpn'ble Justice Mr. Pritinlker Diwaker 30-06-2009: 1 &3. Mrs. Meena Shastri, coun Mr. Shashank Thakur, P. Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, c Counsel for the petitioi^er submits that she may be permitted to withdraw the pr^ent petition with liberty to file appeal before the Collector raisijig her grievances. Accordingly, the petltion liberty asaforesaid. In the eventuality of filing| decided on merits by the Collec the respective parties. It is expected that if the aj decided by the Collector withir^ receipt of such appeal. As this Court has granted| 10.8.2005, the interim protectid petitioner till the decision ofthe^pp tftiqfci^l W^ff "^ f6<^l ^T^K ^sffimaiifcCT sel for the petitioner. L. for the State/ respondents No. tiunsel for respondent No. 2. is dismissed as withdrawn with such appeal, the same would be ;tor by giving full opportunities to ppeal is filed, the same would be three months from the date of stay in favour of the petitioner on n will continue in favour of the Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge