HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.274 OF 2008 DATE:21-12-2010 BETWEEN Koneru Kasi Visweswara Rao …Petitioner AND Inampudi Satyanarayana Murthy …Respondent THIS COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.274 OF 2008 ORDER: On allowing the amendment of plaint with regard to the name of the village where the suit pronote was executed and also the dates on the ground that the same were wrongly typed as 13.10.1994 instead of 1.10.1994; 5.9.1997 instead of 24.8.1997; and 18.5.2006 instead of 18.5.2000, the present revision is filed by the defendant to revise the order of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, dated 8.10.2007 passed in I.A.No.631 of 2007 in O.S.No.585 of 2006. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that after commencement of trial, no amendment can be allowed in view of proviso to Order VI Rule 17 C.P.C. and that the dates that were sought to be amended in the plaint are not in consistent with the suit pronote. The lower Court is not precluded from exercising the discretion in allowing the amendment to advance the justice. The discretion exercised by the lower Court in allowing the impugned I.A. does not suffer from any infirmity for the reason that if the suit is decided against the petitioner basing on the impugned amendment, ultimately, the same can be questioned in the appeal. Therefore, if the impugned order is allowed to stand, the same will not attain finality and the correctness of it can always be canvassed in appeal. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed granting liberty to the petitioner to assail the correctness of the order in the event the suit is decreed against the petitioner. No order as to costs. _______________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J. DECEMBER 21, 2010 Tsr.