IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.36090 of 2010 RAJEEV KUMAR SINGH @ CHUNNU, Son of Mithilesh Prasad Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 02.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Arms Act. Allegation is that petitioner has brought arm in the house of Vineet Bhadani. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it has wrongly been stated that the arm resembles A.K. 47 rifle. He further submits that neither the butt number nor the manufacturing number nor company number has been inscribed on it. He further submits that the arm in question has been made of an old iron. He further submits that in these circumstances, it cannot be even said that this would be a proper rifle itself. The petitioner is in custody for more than six months and does not have any criminal antecedent. He further submits that co-accused Vineet Bhadani has already been granted bail. In the circumstances, petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, 2 Gaya in connection with Civil Lines P.S. case no. 127 of 2010, with the condition that the petitioner would report to nearby police station once every two months and will file an affidavit to this effect in the court below. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)