IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10928 of 2010 1.GIRI RANI @ GINI RANI @ GINI DEVI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAUTANAWA P.S. SHIKARPUR, DIST. WEST CHAMPARAN 2.SUNAINA DEVI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MATHIA, P.S. LAURIA, DIST. WEST CHAMPARAN. PETITIONERS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR…………………………………..O.P. ----------- 2 22.4.2010 Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar No.1, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Suraj Pd. Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Lauria P.S. case No. 83 of 2009 dated 1.8.2009 registered under sections 323, 325, 316, 341, 120B, 354, 448, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian penal Code According to the prosecution case these two petitioners are alleged to have assaulted by brick on chest and abdomen of the informant, who was carrying pregnancy. As a result of aforesaid assault, there has been miscarriage resulting into death of quick unborn child. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that all offences except offence under section 316 of the Indian Penal Code are bailable and the present case has been lodged because of previous enmity between the parties. It is further submitted that since there is no injury report on the record, therefore, petitioners may be extended the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the State has strongly opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail made on behalf of the petitioners and has submitted that there is specific and direct allegation against the petitioners for committing the crime punishable under section 316 I.P.C. In the aforesaid background, the prayer for anticipatory bail - 2 - made on behalf of the petitioners is rejected. They must surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and, if so advised, seek regular bail. If such a petition is filed, then the same may be disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) . M.Rahman