IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-33614 of 2008 Date of Decision: December 19, 2008 Kiran Pal … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others. …Respondents. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND Present : Mr. Hari Om Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** S.D. Anand, J. The petitioner – prisoner is on parole and he is to surrender on 20.12.2008. The learned counsel for the petitioner-prisoner argues in favour of the grant of extension of parole period because petitioner-prisoner is required to be by the side of his wife who has delivered a child and is unwell. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. S.S. Mor, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Crl. Misc. No. M-33614 of 2008 After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, it is ordered that the parole period of the petitioner-prisoner shall stand extended for a period of four weeks. It will be for the learned State counsel to communicate the order to the Competent Authority. Copy of this order be given to the learned counsel for the parties under the signatures of the Court Secretary. December 19, 2008 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2