IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7969 OF 2008 Ashok Nivrutti Walasane ..Petitioner versus Mandangad Taluka Vikas Mandal Mumbai & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Santosh Narwade i/b. M/s. M. P. Vashi & Associates for Petitioner. Mr. S. A. Rajeshirke for Respondent No. 2. CORAM : D. D. SINHA & A. A. SAYED , JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 02, 2010. P.C. : Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. In writ petition No. 7969 of 2008, it is brought to the notice of this Court that by Order dated 18th January 2010 the said writ petition came to be disposed of. However, in the said Order this Court has observed that respondent No. 2 though served remained absent, though the learned counsel for respondent No. 2 Mr. S. A. Rajeshirke was present at the time of hearing of the writ petition. In the circumstances the words in line 2 of paragraph 1 “Respondent No.2, though served remained absent” be substituted by the words “Respondent No.1 and 3 though served remained absent.” The words in lines 9 and 10 of paragraph 2 “Respondent No. 2” be substituted by the words “Respondent No. 1 and 3.” The words in line 3 of paragraph 5 “Respondent Management” be substituted by words “Respondent No.1 Management” Order stands corrected accordingly. (D. D. SINHA, J.) ( A. A. SAYED, J.)