IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9806 of 2010 BINOD KUMAR @ BINOD PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 07.04.2010 This is the second attempt of the petitioner seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Section 304(B) of the Penal Code. Earlier his prayer for bail was considered and rejected by this Court vide order dated 30.11.2009 (Annexure-1). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation is attributed against the husband only. Considering this aspect of the matter one of the co-accuseds, similarly placed, has since been released on anticipatory bail by this Court. Be that as it may, regard being had to the fact that petitioner’s earlier application for anticipatory bail was rejected by this Court and since then he is evading arrest, this Court is not inclined to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail. However, I am persuaded to observe that the learned Court below, while considering his application for regular bail, shall also take into account that one of the co-accuseds has since been privileged with anticipatory bail. The application stands disposed of. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)