- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.492 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.1198 OF 2003 Thakordas Jekisondas Randeria ...Plaintiff vs. 1.Laliben Kanchanlal Randeria and others. ...Defendants and 1.Jayeshkumar D.Shukharamwala and others. ...Respondents --- Mr.H.M.Mehta i/b. Akshay Vani, for Plaintiff. None for Defendants and Respondents. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED: 21st MARCH,2009. DATED: 21st MARCH,2009. DATED: 21st MARCH,2009. P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. This is a chamber summons taken out to bring the legal heirs of defendant nos.11 to 13 and 19 on record. It was stated on the last occasion that the - 2 - proposed defendants could not be served. Thereafter, time was sought to serve them. Accordingly all the parties are now duly served as is evidenced from the affidavit proving service. There is no reply affidavit. The statements made in the affidavit in support are, thus, undisputed. Further, the details of the heirs and the legal representatives are provided by the surviving defendants themselves. In these circumstances, there is no impediment in making the chamber summons absolute as prayed. 2. Chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) to (c). 3. Amendment be carried out within a period of four weeks from today. Amended plaint be served within a period of four weeks thereafter. 4. Additional written statement, if any, be filed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of amended plaint. 5. No order as to costs. - 3 - (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.)