IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 36501 of 2010 Date of decision:21.12.2010 Raja @ Raj Kumar Petitioner vs. State of Haryana Respondent Present: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate. Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Hry M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioner seeks the concession of pre-arrest bail in a case, registered at the instance of Devi Rani alleging that the petitioner had forcibly taken the complainant to his house, misbehaved with her and on resistance being offered by the complainant, the petitioner allegedly gave beating to the complainant by catching hold of her hair. The complainant being unable to bear the insult, consumed sleeping pills and thereafter insecticides on the next date. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had been helping the complainant, she being not financially sound and that it was her husband, who had given beating to her suspecting her relations with the petitioner. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. No doubt all the offences are bailable except offence u/s 506 IPC. A perusal of the police file indicates that the sufficient material has been gathered by the investigating agency indicating that the complainant had been threatened by the petitioner. On inquiry, conducted by DSP, the allegations have been found to be correct. The circumstances warrant the grant of regular bail but no extra ordinary exceptional circumstances exist for the grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. Nothing mentioned in the order will prejudice the right of the petitioner to seek regular bail by surrendering before the Illaqa Magistrate. December ,2010 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE