IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 26 OF 2010 SANGAPPA V. TENGINAKAI ... Petitioner Versus THE STATE ... Respondent Applicant in person, present. Shri C. A. Ferreira, Public Prosecutor for the Respondent. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 10th August, 2010 P.C.:- Heard the applicant in person. According to the applicant, in a complaint filed by him he was directed to pay bhatta charges for issuance of summons to the accused, against which he filed a revision petition to the Court of Sessions. Before the Court of Sessions, it appears that the applicant sought a warrant to be issued to the Respondents but the said request of the applicant came to be rejected with an observation that since the Respondents were not served there was no question of issuing a warrant. In my view, the observation of the learned Sessions Judge cannot be faulted. The applicant would be required to serve the Respondents with copy of the revision petition and in case they are served, and they do not appear, the question of issuing warrant may arise. There is no merit in this application and the same is dismissed. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.