1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 5/4/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN Writ Petition (MD)No.4000 of 2011 R.Vaithianathasamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1. Union of India rep. By the Chief Security Commissioner Railway Protection Force VI Floor, MMC, Chennai 3. 2. The Divisional Security Commissioner Railway Protection Force Tiruchirapalli Division Southern Railways, Tiruchirapalli 3. Senior Divisional Financial Manager Tiruchirapalli Division Southern Railway, Tiruchirapalli. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus praying to direct the respondents (i) to revise and refix the time scale of pay of the petitioner from i.e., Rs.4000-6000 to Rs.5500-175-9000 with effect from 1/10/1999 (ii) To grant the arrears of salary, arrears of settlement payments consequent upon the re-fixation of pay with effect from 1/10/1999 (iii) To sanction the retirement pension on the basis of re- fixation of pay and to pay the arrears of pension etc from 1/9/2008 and (iv) To grant such other suitable relief or directions that may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Banumathy For Respondents : Mr.S.Manohar O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing fort he petitioner and Mr.S.Manohar for the respondents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition praying to revise and refix the time scale of pay of the petitioner from i.e., Rs.5500-175-9000 with effect from 1/10/1999; to grant the arrears of salary, arrears of settlement payments consequent upon the re-fixation of pay with effect from 1/10/1999 and to sanction the retirement pension on the basis of re-fixation of pay and to pay the arrears of pension etc from 1/9/2008. 4. learned counsel appearing for the respondents state that a representation should have been given to the second respondent and not to the first respondent. 5. In view of the above stated position, I direct the petitioner to send a copy of the representation to the second respondent within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on receipt of the same, the second respondent is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks thereafter. 6. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Chief Security Commissioner Union of India, Railway Protection Force VI Floor, MMC, Chennai 3. 2. The Divisional Security Commissioner Railway Protection Force, Tiruchirapalli Division, Southern Railways, Tiruchirapalli. 3. The Senior Divisional Financial Manager Tiruchirapalli Division Southern Railway, Tiruchirapalli. +1 CC to M/s.T.Banumathy, Advocate (SR.No.12682) +1 CC to Mr.S.Manohar, Advocate (SR.No.12797) W.P.(MD)No.4000 of 2011 5.4.2011 mvs NSV/9.4.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/