1 ao130 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.130 OF 2005 Rajashree Rajaram Jadhav ...Appellant vs. Maharashtra Housing And Area Development Authority ...Respondent Mr.R.D.Soni i/b M/s.Ram & Co. for the appellant Mr.A.R.Patil, A.G.P for the respondent CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : FEBRUARY 25,2011 ORAL JUDGMENT: 1 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent. By this Appeal from Order, the appellant-original plaintiff has taken an exception to the Judgment and Order passed by the trial Court on 20 th April 2002 in a notice of motion taken out by her. A suit was filed by the appellant-plaintiff for declaration that the defendant has no right to revoke allotment of the suit premises allegedly made to the appellant and to evict the appellant. The trial Court by the impugned Judgment and order dismissed the notice of motion. Ad-interim relief granted earlier was continued by this Court. 2 The learned counsel for the appellant states that the suit is still pending. The suit is of the year 2001. Ad-interim relief granted by this Court on 25 th June 2002 was ordered to be continued till the disposal of the appeal. Thus, for a period of nine years, the appellant has been protected. Now, the suit itself can be disposed of. 2 ao130 3 Considering the nature of the controversy, the Appeal from Order is disposed of by passing the following order : i) Ad-interim relief granted by this Court on 25th June 2002 which was continued by order dated 29 th March 2005 will continue to operate till the disposal of the suit. ii)Hearing of the suit is expedited. iii)All contentions of the parties on merits of the suit are kept open. iv)Civil application no.662 of 2002 does not survive and the same is disposed of. JUDGE