V W k9 ”V sljgGLE 5mm (y q/ ‘ 6‘\QO.‘/ 'W: C IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISQARH AT BILASPUR (CG) WRIT PETITION N0. I, $4—4—/2005 PETITIONER / J.P. Gupta, aged about 55 years, son of Shri N.K. Gupta, working as Divisional Engineer (Telephone), Department of Bharat Sancha Nigam Limited, C.G. Circle, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS / 1. The Cief General Manager, Telecom, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Lilnited, C.G. Circle, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. The General Manager, Telecom, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, C.G. Circle, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Union of India, through — the Secretary, Department of Telecom, New Dehli. 'WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF OWRIT IN FORM OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER § APPROPRIATE FORM/ ORDER/ DIRECTION i UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE r h / / XI—HC-22 25.4.2005 Mr. KR. Nair, counsel for t Mr, V.V.S‘ Murthy, Standir‘ Mr‘ R‘ Pradhan, Standingi Heard. The main grievance of the 1 Raipur to Bastar in violation of t1 ‘can be made unless he comple petitioner is that his wife is $11 necessary for him to be atNRaipur Learned conned for the allowed to make a repreeentatioi petition raising all his grievances repreeefltation, to which counsel i Having heard learned c0111 and circumstances of the ca: representation along with copy of today to respondent No.1 raising 1' is directed ,to decide the represe month from the date of receipt J after considering all the grievanci law. it is directed that the petitioi is decided, if already not relieved. With the direction aforesai Consequently, M.W.P. No. stand disposed of. Certified copy as per rules he petitioner, Lg Counsel for respondent No.1 85 2. )ounsel for Union of India / respondent No.3, )etitioner is that he has been transferred from 1e transfer policy which says that no transfer tes the station tenure. Further case of the ffering'from depression problem and as for specialized doctor’s advice. petitioner submits that petitioner my be 1 to respondent No.1 along with copy of this and respondent No. 1 be directed to decide his or the respondents have no objection. lsel for the parties and having regard to facts ie, the petitioner is allowed to me a this petition Within a period of one week from 111 his grievances and in turn respondent o 1 ntation of the petitioner within anothr one 31” the representation in an objective manner s raised by the petitioner in accordance ith 1er shall not be relieved till the represtation ‘t i, the petition stands disposed of. 1203/05 8r LA. Nos.3010/05 & 3011/05 also Sd/- L. C.Bhadoa Judge (detleél' W x I it w a ak N. e w en