IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14415 of 2009 ABINASH KUMAR @ AVINASH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6 18.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Every allegation is made in the complaint petition regarding demand of dowry and torture for its non-fulfilment. There could be some reality than only skill but development in course of attempt to resolve the differences and hear the parties, accompanied with assertion made in paragraph- 5 of the complaint petition, demolishes the reality and it appears that it is only skill as in paragraph-5 it is given that after ousting the complainant, petitioner-husband went to complainant’s parent and requested to accompany him. If torture was only due to non-fulfilment of demand, such request was not possible. Further in attempt to reconcile, the complainant went to the house of petitioner and without disposal of the bail petition as it was kept pending, every torture would be committed is not believable because of the reason that no one would give 2 opportunity to create further torture. These are the reasons while it is observed that it is only skill which never can be taken to refuse anticipatory bail. In the circumstances, prayer for bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa (Nalanda), in Complaint Case No. 221 ©/2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)