HIGH GOURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. & HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Writ Appeal No.38S of 2009 Appellant Petitioner Respondents PK Sharma, S/o Rajaram Sharma, Executive Officer, Presently working in Antyavyavasayi Cooperative, Flnance and Development, Bilaspur, aged about 52 years, R/o Civil Lines, Rajanandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon Versus 1 Chhattisgarh State Antyavyavasayi Cooperative, Finance and Devetopment Corporation, Raipur, through its Managing Director 2 Collector-cum-President, Distrtet Antyavyavasayi Cooperative, FJnance and Development Corporatlon, Durg 3 Superintendent of Police, Durg, CG 4 Town Inspector, Durg, CG Writ Appeal under Section 2 (11 of the Chhattisaarh Hlah Court (Appeal to Divislon BencM Act. 2006 Present : Shri TK Tiwari, counsel for the appellant. Judament (2etn February, 2010) The following judgment of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri TK Tiwari, learned counsel for the appellant is heard on admission. 'ii^V^V.^Wh.^W ^ 2) Appellant, PK Sharma has fited this writ appeal against the impugned order dated 01.1 2.2009. passed in WP (Cr) No.7030/2009. 3) The appellant /petitioner in his writ petition was aeeking a direction to respondent No.1 to consider the letter (Annexure P/7) dated 15.09.2009 and further direction to respondent No.4 to make enquiry as per the directions issued by this Court and not to file charge-sheet against the petitioner. 4) The learned Single Judge, on a thorough consideration of the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner and in view of the fact that in the appellant's earlier writ petition it was observed that prima facie case has been made out to initiate criminal case against the petitioner, declined to interfere and dismissed the appellant's writ petition vide impugned order dated 01.12.2009. 5) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the appellant. we do not find any inflrmity in the impugned order which may warrant interference by this Court In this intra Court appeal. 6) The writ appeal, therefore, is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. subbu Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge