IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 5691 of 1995 Between: Anu Giri W/o. Giri, C/o. 'House of Labour' King Koti Road, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Presiding Officer Labour Court-I Hyderabad 2 The Principal, Noble School, Jubilee Hills, Road No.9, Hyderabad. (RR 2&3 dismissed for default vide C.O. dt: 27/11/2000 3 President of the Trust, Noble School, 80 Jubilee Hills, Road No.9, Hyderabad. (RR 2&3 dismissed for default vide C.O. dt: 27/11/2000 .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for the records and quash the award in I.D.NO.19/1994 on the file of Labour Court, Hyderabad and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service with full back wages continuity of service and other attendant benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.G.VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for Respondents 2 and 3: (Dismissed for default) The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed against the Award of the Labour Court, Hyderabad in ID.No.19 of 1994, dated 19.11.1994. 2. The petitioner was working as House Mother in the 2nd respondent-Noble School, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. When her services were terminated, an application, under Section 2(A)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, was filed by the petitioner against the Principal, Noble School and the President of the Trust of the Noble School, who were arrayed as respondents 2 and 3 in this Writ Petition, the 1st respondent being the Presiding Officer, Labour Court-I, Hyderabad, who has been held, in a catena of decisions, as not even a necessary or a proper party to the Writ Petition. Aggrieved by the Award passed by the Labour Court, this Writ Petition is filed. 3. Since the Writ Petition has been dismissed for default against respondents 2 and 3 by an order of this Court dated 27.11.2000, the Writ Petition is pending only against the 1st respondent. In the absence of respondents 2 and 3, the Writ Petition cannot be examined on merits. Since the Writ Petition has been dismissed against respondents 2 and 3 for default on 27.11.2000, the Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed against the 1st respondent also. 5. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. -------------------------------- 11.07.2005 SSR To 1 The Presiding Officer Labour Court-I Hyderabad. 2 2 CCs to G.P. for Labour, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad. (OUT) 3 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{LOBIS}