IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.438 of 2009 PRABHU DAYAL AGRAWAL, Son of Late Mohan Lal Agrawal, having Maniyari Shop in the Shop Katra of Kesharwani Market, Machharhatta, P.S. Khajekalan, P.O. – Jhauganj, Distt. – Patna…..Defendant / Petitioner Versus 1. SMT.LEELAWATI DEVI, wife of Sri Bhairo Nath Kesri, and 2. Amit Kumar Keshri, Son of Sri Bhairo Nath Kesri, both are residents of Mohalla – Machharhatta, P.S. – Khajekalan, P.O. – Jhauganj, Distt. – Patna……………………………….Plaintiffs….Opposite Parties. ----------- 2. 20.03.2009. Heard Mr. Abhay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner. The defendant – petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 23.01.2009, passed by the Munsif, Patnacity, Patna in Title Eviction Suit No. 11/2008, whereby he has been directed to deposit the arrears of rent as well as current and future rents under Section 15 of the Bihar Building (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control, Act, 1982. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that actually the rents for the months of December, 2005 to May, 2008 were paid by the defendant and, therefore, no order should have been passed requiring the defendant to deposit the arrears of rent. The trial court after due consideration of the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties has come 2 to the conclusion that the defendant could not prove that he had paid the aforesaid rents and, as such, has y passed the order impugned. The relationship of landlord and tenant between the plaintiffs and the defendant as well as the rate of rental for the months aforementioned having been admitted by the petitioner, I do not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order. As a result, this Civil Revision is dismissed. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )