In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh C.W.P. No. 978 of 2007 Date of Decision: 22.01.2007 Narender Singh and others …Petitioners Versus Haryana Financial Corporation …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA PRESENT: Mr. I.B. Bhandari, Advocate, for the petitioners. JUDGMENT M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral) The challenge in this petition is to the notice of sale, dated 25.12.2006 (P-1). The argument raised is that Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, is not attracted to the case of a guarantor. The question aforementioned is not res-integra as it has been authoritatively held by a Full Bench of this Court in the case of Paramjit Singh Ahuja v. Punjab State Financial Industrial Development Corporation Limited and others (C.W.P. No. 5397 of 2003, decided on 18.10.2006) that Section 29 would be attracted and applicable to the case of mortgaged property of a guarantor. In view of the above, the instant writ petition fails and the same is dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (VINOD K. SHARMA) January 22, 2007 JUDGE Pkapoor