IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No 310 of 1994 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- VANITABEN P AJMERI Versus PRAKASHKUMAR P AJMERI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR YATIN SONI for Petitioner MR NILESH A PANDYA for Respondent No. 1 MRS. VALIKARIMWALA, LD.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE Date of decision: 15/04/96 ORAL JUDGEMENT Present Criminal Revision Application arises out of the orders in maintenance proceedings. The petitioner wife Smt. Vanitaben Ajmeri had succeeded in the Trial Court, who was awarded the maintenance. Those orders came to be reversed by the Sessions Court at Jamnagar. Therefore petitioner Vanitaben has presented the present Criminal Revision Application. When the matter is being called out today the parties are present along with their learned counsels. They present the consent terms. The parties admit their signatures on the consent terms. The consent terms are also signed by the respective counsels of the parties. In view of this consent terms, present Criminal Revision Application requires to be disposed of and the same is hereby accordingly disposed of. Consent terms be taken on record. Rule shall stand discharged. According to the consent terms every dispute has been brought to an end and the parties are to obtain the divorce by consent in the matrimonial proceedings which are pending before the learned District Judge, Vadodara. The husband is required to deposit an amount of Rs.50,000-00 (Rs. Fifty thousand only) before this Court. The same should be deposited by a demand draft in the name of Registrar of the Court. On the realisation of the draft, Smt. Vanitaben Ajmeri - the petitioner shall be entitled to withdraw the above said entire amount as the full & final settlement regarding her dues for the maintenance. The consent terms say that the remaining amount of Rs.3200-00 is also being paid in cash by the husband to the wife. The parties agree to act according to the consent terms. In view of this, the present Criminal Revision Application as indicated above stands disposed of. The consent terms be taken on record. --------