IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44494 of 2009 1. SUCHIT RANA S/O LATE RAMDHARI RANA R/O BHATAULIA, P.S.MINAPUR, DISTT-MUZAFFARPUR 2. KASHI NATH RANA S/O SUCHIT RANA R/O BHATAULIA, P.S.MINAPUR, DISTT- MUZAFFARPUR 3. LAKHAN DEO RANA S/O LATE RAMDHARI RANA R/O BHATAULIA, P.S.MINAPUR, DISTT-MUZAFFARPUR 4. SANJEEV KUMAR RANA @BASKIT RANA S/O LAKHANDEO RANA R/O BHATAULIA, P.S.MINAPUR, DISTT-MUZAFFARPUR---------------------------Petitioners. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR ---------------- 2. 23.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is land dispute in between the parties. Allegation of theft is super-addition and no case under section 327 of the Indian Penal Code is made out which could be non-bailable also. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of communication of this order the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Complaint Case no.1907 of 2001 , subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J. )