IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 6703 of 1999 Between: Seelam Jayanthi, D/o. Late Talluri Satya Mani (W/o. S.C.Paul) R/o. 13-9-13, Dandubazar Down, Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Director of Medical Education, A.P. Hyderabad-500 001. 2 The Superintendet, Government T.B. and I.D. Hospital, Visakhapatnam-530 001. 3 The Accountant General (A&E), A.P. Saifabad, Hyderabad-500 004. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more appropriately in te nature of the Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents in with holding the D.C.R.G. amounting to Rs.65,000/- arbitrary, without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents to release the D.C.R.G. amounting to Rs.65,000/- together with interest at 24% per annum from the date on which the said amount feel due for payment till its payment, forthwith and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:DR.P.B.VIJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FAMI.WELFARE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO. 6703 OF 1999 ORDER: Since none appeared for the petitioner on 26.3.2008, the writ petition was directed to be posted “for dismissal”. Today though the writ petition is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither is the counsel for the petitioner present nor is there any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as costs. _______________________________ Date: 09.04.2008 RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J MRKR