1 ca9922.09 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9922 OF 2009 IN/WITH CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.21218 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 747 OF 2008 [Venubai Kondaji Gaikwad & Anr. vs. Bhimabai Jabaji Kolge & Ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. R.R. Mantri, Advocate for applicants. Mr. Pokharkar, Advocate for Resp. No.6. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 14TH NOVEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent No.6 vehemently opposed the civil application. 2. Perused the contents of the application. In the facts and circumstances of this case and in the light of contents 2 ca9922.09 in Para-p2 of the application, I am satisfied that delay deserves to be condoned. Delay stands condoned. 3. Civil Application is allowed and in terms of prayer clause (A) and (B) and stands disposed of. 4. Civil Application stamp No. 21218 of 2009 is also allowed. . Necessary amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/NOV11