angke ganch BEFORE THE HON‘BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (227) No. Q1“ ./20I1 f,— PETITIONFR Pooja Lahre, W/o Nand Ram Lahre, aged aboLn‘ 38 year‘s, R/o Bhafgaon, Koshir, Sarangarh, DisT. Rgigar'h (6.6). ‘ VERSUS REsPONDENTs 1. ’ Sta'ré of Chhm‘fisgarh, ' Through The Secrefary, Deparfmenf of Transport D.K.S. Bhuwan, Manfmlaya, Rai'pur' (CG). 2./ The STaTe Transporf AppellaTe Tribunal Raipur‘ Regién, Raipur- (CG) 3. ’K’ The Secrefar'y, Regional TransporT AuThoriTy, Bilaspur Region, Bilaspur' (CG) / 4 Rumpukar Singh S/o Devnandan Singh aged abouT kno‘r know R/o KondaTarai Dist Raigarh (CG). N WRIT PETI'HON UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSUTUTION OF INDIA ‘ raw S K HEGH COURT OF CHHA‘é‘TISGARH : BILASPUR WRET PETETIGN (227‘; NO. 22H OF 2m '1 PETH"£ONER Pooia Lame Versus RE$PONDENTS State of Shhattésgarh 8: 0thefs {Writ Petiiion under Amcie 2270f the Ccnstitutmn of imEa‘; Singie Benah : Horfb§e Sim Sat%sh K. Aanihotri, J. 1 Presents ShriAniiS.Pandey,Acivocate forthe petftioners. I Shri Ajay Dwivedi. Depuky {Sqvemmeni Advocam far me State. GREER {6RAL‘} (Paased on this 3rd day 9f May, 2m 1) i i. 1. Heard Ieamed counsel for‘khe {)arfies. 2. Chaiiwge in ihis petitha is it) the ordef dateé $6‘G420’M (Armexure Fri) passeci by the $iaie Transpmt Ame§ate “Hibunai (by shei't “the SEW“), in Revisim'I Ne. 5832G$9 €8r1mpukar Singh v. Regioriai Tramsvort ALs‘thoritv & {3x3}. 3. Learneci caunsei appearing ?‘<>r the mimwer subm§t5 :hat the peiitbner being a bus opefaior moved an apwica‘imw for grant of permanent permit for i‘ne mute of Jashpur to Khag’siya and i’eium irip‘ The wiwe has beea granted by the Regioea? ‘H’anepoz‘t Au‘ieerity {fer Shm’E “the RTA"3 on few“ May, 2009 (Aanexus’e PJ2}. escerdmg ta the petitionen wh§!e passing the pei‘mk! the respondem authaiities foiiowed the due process c?” iaw by iavmng ebgeciiens from omer bus ooeratore am‘ afier hearieg the earties. passed :he oeder. At the? eme, ihe reseondeet No.4 had riot ra§sed any objectioa before ihe RTA, hewever. ‘He prefermd a revision before iihe STAT ihai Witheu‘i reisieg a ground affmding an oeeortuiniiy of heea‘ing ie the respcneeni No.4 herein. gamed permit i0 ihe oe'iiiienei. i On the besis of ihe said. obiee’iiee. ii7e STAT aiiew‘ed the revisiora if; er: iiiegai arid ei‘biii’erv manner, ”i’hue. ihis petition ab On perusai of the pieadings and; the documents appended théreio, ii appeai’s 'that Ehe STAT has rightiy passed the mpugned Owen Even the petiiéoner has faiied to es€ab§ish the fact a$ta whetherfhe rau‘te from g Jashpur to Khafsiya has been approved by the State Government or no? ) Whiie aibwing the {ewsiem the STA? has'c¥ea§'!y mentioned ai para S‘O‘f its order thai the mime has no: been aeproved by the State f3ovemment m View of the provisions of the ?§;‘:ot0r \lehieie Act. Thus, the pefmit granted in favour of €he peiieonef, is net m accemame with ¥aw, Fer the feasone menimned hereinabove, the writ petition is devoid of meri‘z end is hereby dismissed. $1; sd/ 2A“; ) Sat‘lsh K. Agnihotri 5‘ ; Judge