WP(C) 3509/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE T VAIPHEI Heard Mr J Payeng, the learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the respondents despite proper service of notic e upon them. The petitioner in this writ petition is aggrieved by the non-pay ment of the bill amounting to Rs.2 lakhs submitted by him for supply of 200 (two hundred) nos. of pig units at the rate of Rs.1000/- only per unit. In the year 2007, the Deori Autonomous District Council, Narayanpur (respondent No.1) invite d tender for supply of the aforesaid pig units to the Council. In response to th is, he submitted his quotation, which was finally accepted, and supply order in connection thereto issued in his favour at the rate of Rs.1000/- only per unit. According to the petitioner, he has completed supply of the whole items to the r espondent authorities, which is evident from the Certificate dated 21.02.2007 is sued by the respondent No.2. The Certificate is at Annexure-’C’ to the writ peti tion. Despite repeated representations made by him for payment of the bill, the respondent authorities have refused to pay the same. This prompted him to file t his writ petition for appropriate direction. As the respondent authorities have chosen not to contest the writ petition, I have no alternative but to hold that the case as projected by the petitioner is true. Every allegations of fact in a writ petition, if not denied, specifically or by necessary implication, shall be taken to be admitted except as against a person under dis-ability. As the respo ndent authorities by their omission are deemed to have admitted the allegation o f the petitioner, he is entitled to the relief claim. In the result, this writ petition is allowed. The respondent authorities are directed to release the outstandi ng dues i.e. Rs 2 lakhs to the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order.