—r . Wm.- i smaLE aggw ‘ 6/,10 y IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR- WRIT PETITION N0. /93/ OF 2006 f, ETITIONER : D.N. Shukla, son of Shri P Hariman Shukla, A&C1&t,&é}’m of 566, Priyadarshini Nagar, Ring Road No.2, Raipur. resident RESPONDENT : / Priyadarshini Grih Nirmaan Sahkari Samiti, Raipur, through its Presiden Shri Rajesh Shrivastava, resident of 445 , Priyadarshini Nagar, Raipur. / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 85 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIAVFOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS [CERTIORARI ETC OR DIRECTION(S) I ORDER(S) IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. t HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH ' BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH: HON’BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, C.J. PETITIONER Versus W.P. No.1 429 OF 2006 Yashwant Singh, son of Late Rameshwar Dayal Singh, aged 66 years, .resident of R-6‘ Priyadarshini Nagar. Raipur. RESPONDENT PETITIONER Priyadarshini Grih Nirmaan Sahkari Samiti, Raipur, through its President Shri Rajesh Shriv‘astava, resident of 445, Priyadarshini Nagar, Raipur. Arun Kumar Saxena, son of Late Leeladhar Saxena, aged 55 years, resident of 504B. Priyadarshini Nagar, Raipur. W.P. NO.1430 OF 2006 Versus RESPONDENT PETITIONER ’Priyadarshini Grih Nirmaan Sahkari Samiti, Raipur, through its President Shri Rajesh Shrivastava, resident of 445, Priyadarshini Nagar, Raipur. W.P. NO.1 431 OF 2006 D.N. Shukia, son of Shri Hariman Shukia, aged 46 years, resident of 566, Priyadarshini Nagar, Ring Road No.2 Raipur. Priyadarshini Grih Nirmaan Sahkari Samiti, Raipur, through its President Shri Rajesh Shrivastava, resident of 445, Priyadarshini Nagar, Raipur. RESPONDENT Versus PETITIONER Nanakram Wadhwani, son of Late Sukhuram Wadhwani, aged about 41 years, resident of D-‘t7, Priyadarshini Nagar, Raipur. W.P. NO.1432 OF 2006 Versus RESEWOWNQENJ Priyadarshini Grih Nirmaan Sahkari Samiti, Raipur, through its President Shri Rajesh Shrivastava, resident of 445, Priyadarshini Nagar, Raipur. Shri BP. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners Shri Bhishma Kinger, learned counsel for the respondent. Present (ORAL ORDER) (Passed on 23'“ March, 2006) lnthe light of the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in WP. No.1417/2006, these writ petitions are liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed. No costs, Sdl- Chief Justice