IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 15TH JANUARY 2009 / 25TH POUSHA 1930 WA.No. 1606 of 2006() -------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.21545/2001 .................... APPELLANT(S): PETITIONER ------------------------ M/S.SIEMENS INFORMATION SYSTEMS LTD., 130, PADURANG BUDHKAR MARG, WORLI, MUMBAI-400 018, REP. BY P.V.VENUGOPAL, SENIOR MANAGER, INDIRECT TAXATION & AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER (IB), MATTANCHERRY, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (INT), COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALARIVATTOM, ERNAKULAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 3. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, MAHARASHTRA STATE MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI-400 032. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED RAFIQ (TAXES) THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.KOSHY, Ag.CJ & V.GIRI, J. =========================== W.A.No.1606 of 2006 =============================== Dated this the 15th day of January, 2009. J U D G M E N T Koshy, Ag.CJ. Questioning the order of penalty, appellant approached this Court. The learned Single Judge disposed of the writ petition noticing that there is a statutory remedy provided by way of revision. We see no ground to interfere in the decision of the learned Single Judge. In the writ appeal, stay was issued by another Division Bench of this Court. In the above circumstances, if the appellant files a statutory revision within three weeks from today, interim stay will continue till the disposal of the revision petition. Revisional authority should dispose of the matter within two months from the date of receipt of the revision application and appellant shall not ask for adjournment. J.B.KOSHY, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE. V.GIRI, JUDGE. bkn/-