IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35601 of 2010 RANJAN KUMAR @ CHUNNU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 21.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The prayer for anticipatory bail is made by the petitioner who is an accused in Jakanpur P.S. Case No. 88 of 2005 under sections 395/412 of Indian Penal Code. On perusal of the order of learned Sessions Judge it emerges that there is clear evidence and material to link the petitioner with the crime and he has been identified by many witnesses. In that view of the matter and looking at the nature of the crime the benefit of anticipatory bail cannot be extended to him. The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected, more over chargesheet has already been submitted and case is not under investigation. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)