In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Date : 05.04.2007 Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice P. SATHASIVAM and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. TAMILVANAN Writ Petition No: 5500 of 2007 and M.P.No. 1 of 2007 ...... Mrs. P. Andal ... Petitioner -vs- 1. The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Building, Chennai.3. 2.Mr. P. Ranganathan (Impleaded as per order dt. 5.4.2007 in M.P.No.2 of 2007 by PSJ & STJ) ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation dated 29.11.2006 given by the petitioner to the respondent. For petitioner : Mr. M. Jaikumar For respondents : Mr. Mohammed Ghouse(Corporation). M/s S. Ganesh C.S. Lenin - Proposed Respondent No.22 O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by P. SATHASIVAM,J.,) Considering the limited issue raised, the writ petition itself is taken up for disposal. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. The petitioner has approached this Court to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent – the Commissioner of Corporation of Chennai to consider her representation dated 29.11.2006 and pass appropriate orders. 3. Subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, the petitioner has filed M.P.No. 2 of 2007 seeking to implead one P. Ranganathan as respondent in the above writ petition. Mr. Ganesh, Advocate takes notice for the proposed respondent. 4. Learned counsel for the proposed respondent submitted that the building in question was consstructed on the basis of the approved plan and there is no merit in the complaint of the petitioner dated 29.11.2006. 5. The above statement is hereby recorded. However, in view of the grievance of the petitioner that her representation is still pending with the first respondent – Commissioner of Corporation of Chennai, we are of the view that ends of justice would be met by directing the first respondent – Commissioner of Corporation of Chennai to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 29.11.2006 in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. It is made clear that before passing any order, the Commissioner of Corporation of Chennai is directed to hear the petitioner as well as the second respondent viz., P. Ranganathan. 6. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, M.P. No. 1 of 2007 is closed. No costs. ra Sd/ Asst. Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar To 1. The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Building, Chennai.3. + One cc to the Mr. M. Jaikumar Advocate sr 21880 + One cc o M/s S. Ganesh Advocate sR 21733 + One cc to Mr. A. Mohammed Couse (Corporation) SR.No. 21719 MS (co) sg 16/4/07 W.P.No.5500 of 2007 Date: 05.4.2007 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/