IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8938 of 2009 1. SADANAND MEHTA, SON OF JAGDEO MEHTA 2. VIDYANAND MEHTA, SON OF JAGDEO MEHTA 3. SURESH MEHTA, SON OF JAGDEO MEHTA 4. NARESH MEHTA, SON OF JAGDEO MEHTA 5. DINESH MEHTA, SON OF JAGDEO MEHTA 6. BHOLA MEHTA @ BHOLA PRASAD MEHTA, SON OF LATE SANT LAL MEHTA 7. SHYAM MEHTA @ SHYAM SUNDAR MEHTA, SON OF BANTER MEHTA ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE – TONHA, P.S. BHARGAMA, DISTT. ARARIA. --------- PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MAHENDRA PASWAN, SON OF RAM KISHUN PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – TONHA, P.S. BHARGAMA, DISTT. ARARIA. --------- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 01.09.2010 Heard the parties. It has been submitted that the petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 4.8.2000 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in G.R. No. 1131 of 1999 corresponding to Bhargama P.S. Case No. 81 of 1999 by which he has taken cognizance under Section 436 of the Indian Penal Code differing with the final report submitted in the matter The petitioners had filed a revision application bearing Cr. Revision No. 463 of 2000 which was dismissed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Purnea, even though he had filed notices for the Opposite Party No. 2. However, considering that the order of cognizance is completely valid, this Court refuses to interfere in the matter. 2 The application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)