IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1156 of 2009 The Man.Comm.Of Madarsa Islamia, Bochi Madarsa No.402, P.S. Tarabari, District Araria through its Secretary Sk. Taiyab … Appellant Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Special Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna 3. The Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Patna through its Chairman 4. The Chairman, the Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Patna 5. The Secretary, the Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Patna 6. The Managing Committee of Madarsa Islamia Bochi Madarsa No.402, P.S. Tarabari, District – Araria through its Secretary, Farooque Alam. …….. Respondents ----------- For the appellant: Mr. M.Z. Quamar, Advocate For the Madarsa Board: Mr. Rashid Alam, Advocate For the State: Mr. Indeshwari Pd. Mandal, AC to GA VIII 2 7/9/2009 Heard Mr. M.Z.Quamar, counsel for the appellant, Mr. Rashid Alam, counsel for respondent nos. 3 to 5 and Mr.Indeshwari Pd. Mandal, counsel for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Even though the matter has been listed for consideration of delay in filing the appeal, we deem it appropriate, for the reasons stated, to condone the delay in filing the appeal and dispose of the same at this stage. 2 The writ petition was filed by the present respondent no.6 making certain grievance and highlighting about filing of a representation as per Annexure- 3 to the writ petition. The learned single judge has simply passed the following order: “Let the Chairman of the Board consider the representation of the petitioner, Annexure - 3 after holding due inquiry and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.” The said direction is being questioned by the present Managing Committee. The order passed by the learned single judge does not purport to decide any issue and there is simply a direction for the Chairman of the Board to consider the representation, Annexure -3. We, therefore, see no scope for any grievance for the present appellant. Be that as it may, to allay any apprehension we make it clear that the order passed by the learned single judge should not be construed as expressing any opinion in the matter and the Chairman has to consider the representation by giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned. 3 With the above observation, the appeal is disposed of. Neyaz/ ( P.K.Misra, CJ.) (Anjana Prakash, J.)