rr' -HC—78 ^n^^f'f^i^ ^^T ^7y^¥? 5^*41^ i.te).u-.,A,.-W,,.;.-,fB;-itS;..^,.;-;':>,, ^llp^^ V"" «<i<t?trapn^ '?5c? ^i^i<rt<4, ^^•M<I(O, ^^r'tf^ —....E.±'*.:....s.slo6.... ^NI^R ^Ft2©0 ^¥TTR^(^^^) ^^??^R °^ft^S^^ HIGHCOURTOF ^1€<(^1^1'ETR^ff ^ fe^ Tf^j^K CHHATTISGARH AT ^TlS^PE^F Coram : Hon'ble Shri Dhirehdra Hon'ble Shri Dilip Mishra and Raosaheb Deshmukh, JJ. First Appeal t\ Appellant Plaintiff Manishj Kumar Nimani, Aged 28 years, S/o Pr^kash Chand Nimani, R/o 47/210, Hanum^n Mandir, Gali Brahaman Para, IDistrictRaipur(CG) Raipur, Versus Respondent Defendant Bharti VV/o Manish Kumar Nimani, Aged about ^6 years, R/o Kailash Chand Baid, Baid Blectronics Mahavir Chowk Main Road, palaghat (M.P.) First Appeal under Section 19(1 Present: Shri Manoj Paranjpe, coun Shri Devendra Patel, couni ORAL ORDER (Passed on divorce, the respondent got married. permanent alimony till the marriage of| Since the respondent is alread^ o.880f2006 of the Familv Courts Act, 1984 >el for the appellant. >el for the respondent 9.01.2009) The following oral order of t|he Court was passed by Dhirendra Mishra, J. Shri Manoj Paranjpe, learned (j:ounsel for the appellant submits that he has instructions from the appellarjit that after passing of the decree of "he appeal is only against the grant of respondent. married, the appellant does not want to press this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is disnriissed as not pressed. In view ofthe above, M.(C).P.r^o.743/2006 stands disposed of. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Sd/- DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge i9?5te^^'^.^B-i%<!«'u"?^:<W"?*