1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4688 OF 2009 Office notes, office memoranda of Corum, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s Judge’s orders. Mr. M.P. Kale , Counsel for Petitioner. Mr. U.K. Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent – State. [ CORAM : K.K.TATED, J. ] DATE : 21/07/2009 1. Heard Mr. M.P.Kale, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner and Mr. U.K. Patil, learned A.G.P. appearing on behalf of Respondent no. 1 – State. 2 2. By this Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner is challenging the Order dated 1/8/2006 passed by the Respondent no. 1 in Appeal preferred by the petitioner challenging the Order dated 29/9/2005 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad. Without going into the merit of the present case, the Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay and latches. The impugned Order is passed by the Respondent no. 1 on 1/8/2006 and the same was received by the petitioner. The present petition is filed on 11/6/2009 i.e. after 2 years and 10 months. There is no explanation in the petition for said delay. 3. In any case, because of delay on the part of the petitioner, rights are created in favour of other party. Once right are created in favour of party, it is not proper to entertain the petition which is filed after inordinate delay of 2 years and 3 10 months. Writ Petition dismissed on the ground of delay and latches. [ K. K. TATED ] JUDGE knp/WP4688.09 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12