1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO.113 OF 2003 Anjuman Tousheed-Ul-Muslimeen & Ors. .... Petitioners Vs. State of Goa & Ors. .... Respondents Sri M.S. Sonak for the Petitioners. Sri S.R. Rivankar, GA, for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2. CORAM: SRI R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & SRI S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATED: JULY 30, 2008 P.C: The learned counsel for the petitioners states that pursuant to the order dated 18-3-2005 passed in this petition, the respondents have already passed the order and thereby have rejected the proposal submitted by the petitioners. In view thereof, the petitioners want to challenge the same. He has also further submitted that the petitioners have already taken out an application for amendment of the present petition being Misc. Civil Application No.563 of 2008. However, in our considered opinion, we find that the petitioners can very well challenge the said order by a fresh petition and there is no question of 2 grant of any amendment to the present petition. Leaving that liberty to the petitioners, nothing survives in the present petition and, therefore, the petition is disposed of. It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on any of the points sought to be raised on merits in the matter and all the issues are kept open. Rule stands discharged with no order as to costs. Sd/- Sd/- (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/WP113.3