IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-12642 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.05.2011 Roshni ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Surender Saini, Advocate, for the petitioners. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Petitioner is facing trial for the offences punishable under Sections 304-B, 498-A read with Section 34 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly stated that out of 15 prosecution witnesses 10 have already been examined. There seems to be no undue delay in the trial. First application moved by the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn on 14.5.2010. No good ground and subsequent event is brought on record justifying second bail application. Dismissed. (Alok Singh) Judge May 02, 2011 R.S.