IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.20396 of 2010 Vijay Kumar Singh Versus The Union Of India & Ors ----------- For the Petitioner :M/s Sanjay Kumar Verma & Vijay Bihari Sinha, Advocates For the CBSE :Mr.Vijay Krishna Tripathi, Advocate ---- 2. 22.07.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the CBSE. The petitioner’s son Kumar Gaurav (hereinafter called ‘the student’) was a student of AVN English School at Patna affiliated to CBSE. He appeared successfully at the Secondary School Examination conducted in the year 2006 and the Senior Secondary School Examination in the year 2008. He has now secured admission in the University College of Engineering, Rajasthan Technical University, Kota in the State of Rajasthan. His admission in the University is at stake because of certain discrepancy in his parentage as mentioned in the Secondary School results and the Senior Secondary School results. His photograph in the Admit Card for the two examinations were different including a difference of three days in the date of birth between the two. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the parentage and other details were wrongly entered for no fault of the student at the Secondary examination stage. Subsequently the School furnished the correct details whereafter the CBSE made correct entries at the Senior Secondary stage. The petitioner is being unnecessarily harassed for corrections in the former. The School has already furnished the necessary details to the CBSE. There is no rival claimant or any other dispute. Shri Tripathy appearing for the CBSE has placed the original list of candidates furnished by the School to the CBSE for the Secondary 2 School Examination in 2006. He submits that the errors were not on the part of CBSE but in the details furnished by the School initialed by the student. The Court has perused the list of candidates. They are all filled up in one handwriting though ink is not discernable as the Xerox copy of the same is in black and white. The details were obviously filled by the School staff. The student trusted them to make correct entries of details. The Court at this stage will not like to go into a fault finding exercise or a blame game. At stake is the academic career of the student. The CBSE as on 8.6.2010 required relevant information/documents from the school in accordance with its own procedure. The communication sent by the School on 24.9.2006 appended to the writ application does not appear to be in consonance with the requirement of the CBSE. The orders of the Court are required to be complied with by every person to whose attention it is brought unless there be valid explanation for the same. From the facts noticed above, no useful purpose is going to be served by directing issuance of notice to AVN School and keeping the writ petition pending which will only further put in peril the University admission of the student. Directions are therefore issued to the AVN School that within seven days from the date that the petitioner appears before the Principal along with a copy of the present order, necessary information in terms of the request of the CBSE dated 8.6.2010 shall be forwarded by the School on the seventh day to the CBSE. This period shall naturally be regulated by such information that the School may desire from the petitioner when it shall be computed from the date that the petitioner submits the same to the School. Shri Tripathi appearing for the CBSE fairly submits that within seven days from the date that the relevant informations in terms of the letter dated 3 8.6.2010 is submitted to the CBSE it shall issue the corrected documents of the Secondary School Examination 2006 of the student. Let Mr. Tripathy furnish a Xerox copy of the letter dated 8.6.2010 to the Counsel for the petitioner during course of the day for the needful. In the facts of the case, the Court considers it proper that Column 8 of the letter dated 8.6.2010 shall not operate to the prejudice of the student and the CBSE cannot decline to issue necessary corrected documents on that ground. The Court hopes and trusts that keeping in mind the academic career of the young student, the University shall provide adequate bufferage time to him so that his admission is not put to peril for no fault of his. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)