IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33056 of 2009 UMESH KAHAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.9.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a Police case under Section 395 of the Penal Code registered against 22 to 25 unknown. While learned counsel for the petitioner urges false implication. Learned counsel for the State points out that the impugned order of rejection notices certain paragraph from the case diary for his ‘complicity’. In absence of any discussion or reasons in the impugned order of the nature of the complicity, this Court finds it difficult to direct continued custody affecting liberty, on surmises. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna in connection with Bhadaur P.S. Case No. 38 of 1992. Let a copy of the order be sent to the presiding officer who has passed the impugned order. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)