IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 24TH JULY 2008 / 2ND SRAVANA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3796 of 2007() ------------------------------ CMP. NO. 3988 OF 2006 OF THE ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REVN. PETITIONER: ------------------ AJANTHA KUMARI,SRUTHI NILAYAM T.C. 19/131 (2) PUNNAKKA MUGHAL ARAMADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.GOPAKUMAR R.THALIYAL RESPONDENTS: ACCUSED & STATE ---------------------------- 1. VIJAYAKUMARI, T.C.19/17 VPS 427 THELIBHAGOM, VATTAVILA THIRUMALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.PRADEEP FOR R1 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.M. NAZAR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.R.P. No. 3796 of 2007 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 24th day of July 2008 ORDER Petitioner's private complaint alleging offences punishable under Sections 406, 408, 420, 467, 468 and 471 I.P.C. filed before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvananthapuram, has been dismissed under Sec. 203 Cr.P.C. Except producing the notice allegedly issued from the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Poojappura, no document was produced in support of her allegations regarding the non-return of the signed stamp paper . Hence, this Court sitting in revision will be loathe to interfere with the conclusions reached by the Magistrate. It is , however, made clear that this will not preclude the petitioner from filing a properly framed complaint with necessary documentary evidence to substantiate her case, if true. With the above observation, this Crl.R.P. is disposed of. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani. V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.R.P. No. 3796 of 2007 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 24th day of July 2008 ORDER