IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 28 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 83 OF 2002 RAMASWAMI SYPAIYYA VENUGOPAL ... Applicant Versus UNION OF INDIA THROUGH COMMISSIONER CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. S. P. Kanuza, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. J. Vaz, Central Government Standing Counsel for the Respondents. Coram:- A. P. DESHPANDE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 16th December, 2008 P.C. This Review Application has been filed seeking review of a Judgment of this Court dated 14.11.2008. 2. The main contention raised by the learned Counsel for the applicant is that the Judgment proceeds on an assumption that the adjudication Order passed by the Commissioner has attained finality whereas, according to him, an appeal is pending with the Customs Excise and Service Tax and Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench, Mumbai. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents points out that in the first place the appeal is not at the behest of the present applicant and the same is filed by some other party. No appeal has been filed by the present applicant. Even otherwise, we are of the view, that pendency of the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal does not affect the conclusions arrived at in the Judgment. 3. In the result, there being no merit, the Review Application is rejected. A. P. DESHPANDE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. arp/*