IN THE COURT OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Writ Petition No. 2.54 2004 PETITIONER - Kumari Sunita Paruthi aged about 22 years Daugh— ter of Satpal Paruthi and Late Smt. Sirveriya Paruthi f?! after second marriage the mother had changed its name of Smt. Suman Sharma wife of Mr. I .- . z > U.K.Sharma. Resident of By Mr. U.K. Sharma, ' "Kamala-Hospitai" near‘Mourya Taikies Bhiiai, District Durg (C.G.) Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227; of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ/writs in the nature of Mandamus/and/or certiorari/ and/or/prohibition/and/or other suitable writ/writs Direction/Directions, order/orders. 3 Versus RESPONDENTS - 1. State of Chhattisgarh through its secretary Medicai and heaith Services, Mantraiaya 453$ D.K.S. Bhavan Raipur (C.G.) la. 5W ‘ H Director, Medical and health Services C.G. Kb“- 3 a?) i ’WQ’V‘w StateRaipur (C.G.) ex Chief Medicai and health Officer, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) M State of M.P. through its Secretary Health ‘d and Medical Services Mantraiaya Ballabh C97} Bhavan, Bhopal (M.P.) Union of India through its secretary person- nel department New Delhi. XI—HC-22 3a W mWR; faaW mm U i3 . w‘f’mo.255‘g/0Lr mm Vi 2m; ma mr as: W 3m .‘.¥I‘%‘ri WmnMxWgém ammww mafa’wm 21 -1 2-2005 Petitioner by Shri XVYWL Whaley) Advocate Shri Vivek Sharma1 Panei Lawyer, for the State. Heard. This case relates to compassionate appointment consequent upon the death of an employee sewing in the State. Learned counsel for the petitionei categorically stated that in this case, the death of the employee has occurred on or after 1‘11 4997 and not earlier. It is further submitted that in batch of cases bearing WP. No. 1 322/2002 involving the same question orders have been passed by this Court on 20/1 2/2005. He‘ orays that similar orders may be passed in this case aiso. Learned counsel for the State does not dispute the above fact and state that the State of Chhattisgarh has taken a decisionito consider the cases of dependants of those employees who died on or after 1/1 1/19 7 strictly in accordance with the policy prevalent at thattime. in view of the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the m rits of the case; in the opinion ofthis Court. ends of justice will be served if a direction is giv n to the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities concerned to consider and decide the se of the petitioner in accordance with the policy prevalent at the time of death of the e ployee concerned. If the petitioner found eligible, appointment orders will be issued as e rly as possible on or before 30‘" April, 2006i The petitioner is also directed to render due c —operation to the authorities. it is made clear that if any grievance still remains, the petitio er may avail the remedy available under the law including filing of the petition-before this ourt. With the aforesaid observations. t is petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. Copy to the State counsel, wh will be obliged to communicate the order to the respondents for compliance. '(f Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge l New em... .»