(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 621 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9386 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 9386 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 9386 OF 2004 Sandeep Arun Narke ...Petitioner Versus Vinay Vilasrao Kore & Ors. ...Respondents ..... Mr. Y.S. Jahagirdar with T.D. Deshmukh, counsel for Petitioner Mr. S.S. Patwardhan, counsel for Respondent No.1. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 11TH MARCH, 2005 DATED: 11TH MARCH, 2005 DATED: 11TH MARCH, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard. 2. This is an application for restoration of writ petition No.9386 of 2004 which came to be dismissed in default on account of the conditional order dated 17.1.2005. 3. As per the office note, the application is beyond time by 31 days. 4. Delay condoned subject to payment of cost quantified at Rs.1,000/-. (-2-) 5. Writ petition No. 9386 of 2004 is restored to file and the application is disposed of accordingly. 6. However, so far as the interim relief in writ petition No. 9386 of 2004 is concerned, Mr. Patwardhan, the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submitted that on account of dismissal of the petition in default, the order passed in Election petition has already operated and therefore, he wants to file reply opposing the prayer for interim relief. Time granted. 7. List the petition No. 9386 of 2004 on 18.3.2005 for orders on interim relief.