:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8295 OF 2006 Mandangad Taluka Vikas Mandal, ...Petitioners Versus Vithal Mahadev Gosavi and 2 Ors. ....Respondents Ms.Deepa Motwankar, Adv. for the petitioners. Ms.Ameya Tamhane Adv. for the respondents. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 17th January, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. The order passed by this court on 5.9.2005 in Writ petition No. 4396 of 2005 was during the pendency of the proceedings before the Assistant Charity Commissioner. The matter has been decided by the :2: :2: :2: Assistant Charity Commissioner and his order was also challenged before the Joint Charity Commissioner. Both proceedings have concluded. In such circumstances, the appointment of fit person by this court cannot continue and must come to an end. By its very nature, the order passed by this court shows that this court made some ad-hoc and interim arrangement. That cannot continue after the proceedings have come to an end. In such circumstances, in the peculiar facts of this case, the fit person appointed pursuant to the order by this court stands discharged. The petition is allowed in the above terms. Needless to state, that this order will not preclude the first respondent from raising appropriate pleas in the Appeal before the Joint Charity Commissioner. *******