IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20930 of 2011 Sandeep Kumar Singh @ Chhotu Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 19.07.2011 It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that initially, case was registered under section 394 of the IPC but after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been submitted under sections 395, 397 and 412 of the IPC and the petitioner may be permitted to implead aforesaid facts in his petition. Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in his petition within the course of day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was juvenile at the time of alleged occurrence and the aforesaid plea was taken before the learned Addl. Sessions Judge but he refused to accept the same. Accordingly, he prays to remit the matter before the trial court for declaration of the petitioner as juvenile. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, this criminal miscellaneous case stands disposed of with direction to the trial court to send the case of the petitioner who is accused in Barhara P.S. Case no. 300 of 2010 to the concerned Juvenile Justice Board for taking steps in accordance with law. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)