RFA Nos.149 of 1999 alongwith RFA Nos.128, 130, 150, 151, 152 of 1999 and RFA Nos.42 and 343 of 2000. RFA No.149 of 1999. 05.11.2009 Present: Shri R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for the appellants. Mr.Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate for the respondent. RFA No.128 of 1999. Shri R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for the appellants. Mr.Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate for the respondents. RFA No.130 of 1999. Shri R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for the appellants. Mr.Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate for the respondents. RFA No.150 of 1999. Shri R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for the appellants. . Mr.Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate for the respondent. RFA No.151 of 1999. Shri R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for the appellants. Mr.Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate for the respondent. RFA No.152 of 1999. Shri R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for the appellants. . Mr.Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate for the respondent. RFA No.149 of 1999. RFA No.42 of 2000. Shri R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for the appellants. Mr.Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate for respondents No.1(a) to 1(f), 2(a) and 2(b). RFA No.343 of 2000. Shri R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for the appellants. Mr.Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate for respondents No.1(a), 1(b), 2, 3(a) and 3(b). RFA Nos.149 of 1999 alongwith RFA Nos.128, 130, 150, 151, 152 of 1999 and RFA Nos.42 and 343 of 2000. The State is aggrieved by the order passed by learned Reference Court enhancing the compensation granted to the petitioner- claimant(s). It is undisputed before me that the award Ex.P-4, relied upon by the learned Reference Court, has since been upheld by this Court in RFA No.66 of 1999, titled: Collector, Land Acquisition, HPPWD, Kullu and Another vs. Machu @ Maghu and Others. This award i.e. Ext.P-4 being the basis for determining the compensation in these appeals also, I do not find any merit in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. The Registry is directed to place on record a copy of the judgment passed in RFA No.66 of 1999, titled: Collector, Land Acquisition, HPPWD, Kullu and Another vs. Machu @ Maghu and Others in each appeal. November 5, 2009 (Dev Darshan Sud) (aks) Judge.