IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.985 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.985 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.985 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (L) NO.901 OF 2005 (L) NO.901 OF 2005 (L) NO.901 OF 2005 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.845 OF PETITION NO.845 OF PETITION NO.845 OF 2004 2004 2004 Maharashtra Association of General Workers .. Applicant V/s M/s.Steelage Industries Ltd. & Ors. .. Respondents ----- Mrs.Neeta Joshi i/b. Mr.A.D.Shetty for the Applicant. Mr.Vinod Tayade for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 12TH APRIL, 2006. : 12TH APRIL, 2006. : 12TH APRIL, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Mentioned not on board. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Applicant is seeking condonation of 1 day delay. Perused the Notice of Motion and the affidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)