1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1278 OF 2007 Vithabai Rajaram Patil & Anr. .. Petitioners Versus Shremabai Maruti Magadum & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Hiten Vegegaonkar for petitioners Mr.S.S.Shah for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 14th January 2008 P.C. . The trial court and lower appellate court have concurred and recorded a prima facie finding that the description of the suit property in the 2 plaint by the petitioner plaintiff is vague. The lower appellate court has assigned reasons as to why it terms the description vague, even at the prima facie stage. It does not appear to me that the observations at para 8 and 10 of the lower appellate court’s order are based on no material or can be termed as perverse, soas to call for interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition dismissed. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)