IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.770 of 2008 RUBI MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02- 23.9.2008 Heard Mrs. Anju Jha for the petitioner, and learned junior counsel to Mr. Prasoon Sinha, Government Advocate No.3. According to the writ petition, the petitioner had functioned as a Shiksha Mitra in Pindaruch Gram Panchayat, within the district of Darbhanga and was also given extension. By order dated 30.5.2004 (Annexure-2), she was transferred to a different school which she did not carry out. It is further stated in the writ petition that she learnt from the communication dated 16.5.2005 (Annexure-6) from the local Mukhiya to the District Panchayat Raj Officer that the services of the petitioner had been dispensed with because she had not joined the school after transfer. 2. It appears to me on a perusal of the materials on record and consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties that the petitioner was transferred by order dated 30.5.2004 (Annexure-2), and has not till date joined the new place. Speaking mildly, this is an act of subversive of discipline and cannot be countenanced. Her services, has therefore, been rightly dispensed with. 3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/ 2