IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37474 of 2010 NARESH PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 09.02.2011 Learned Counsel is permitted to make correction in the prayer portion of the application. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected earlier on 9.9.2009 in Cr. Misc. No. 31795 of 2009 and again on 10.2.2010 in Cr. Misc. No. 3098 of 2010 noticing from paragraph 28 of the case diary that the petitioner was riding pillion while co-accused Raushan was driving the motorcycle and the victim was seen sitting in between. Renewing the prayer for bail learned Counsel submits that Raushan has been granted bail in Cr. Misc. No. 34538 of 2010 on 5.1.2011. The petitioner being similarly situated also deserves bail. It appears that attention of the Court was not adequately drawn to paragraph 28 of the case diary when the order dated 5.1.2011 came to be passed. Nonetheless since litigant perceives the High Court as an institution, on principles of consistency this Court finds it difficult to deny bail to the petitioner. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on similar terms and conditions as incorporated in the aforesaid order on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Bipin Bihari Pandey, Additional Sessions Judge I, Muzaffarpur in Sessions Trial No. 211 of 2010 arising out of Bela PS Case No. 20 of 2008. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)