IN THE HIGHE COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR gg^^ CONTEMPT CASE (C) N0. Ai° I OF 2011 PETITONER RESPONDENTES CONTEMNORS : 1 P^MO. ^^s^ Da2°-"\( ......•-^ ^^?^"" ..^--rr'^T 2. o^-°vf^t\-l| Smt. Krishnawati Singh., wife of Shri Vijay Prakash Pandey, aged about 40 years, U.D.T., Vinoba Aadiwasi Kanya Aashram, Jaisakarra (charama) Distt. Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS Netrapal Singh, Secretary, Mata Rukhmini Sewa Sansthan, Dimrapal, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) Vijay Prakash Ojha, Director, Vinoba Aadiwasi Kanya Aashram jaisakarra (charama), Distt. Kanker (C.G.) ^ Contempt petition under section 2 (A) (B) and 12 of the contempt of court Act. 1971 Read with section (215 of constitution of India f ^ ^%r -%n5^--P7, ^^TT<?, f^c?TRT°^ ~. (A4)^0 ^•A^/'/ ">( "^200 3TT^rr1qiW(1i<Nf3sf^T) 3qfi^Twt-<^ 'CTI W^ST ^?N? •^RR8(?.?^cT3^ SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra IVSohan 21^11-2011 compii^nce ^ Jalsakra Shri Anupam Dubey, counseS Learned counseJ for the petiti^ 21/06/2010 (Annexure C/1) was ass^ which the interim order was passed operatlon of the impugned ordershaii is submitted that though in aiiowed to continue at the present Vinoba Aadiwasi Kanya Aashram, paid which is in dear vioiation of the i| draws attention of the Court to the ci stayed in which It has been written from the piace to which the petitioneri effect of this order was aiso stayed, l comply with the order of the Courtl petjtioner to continue at her present p| the petitioner is continuousiy working ^ The order, ihe effect and opei salaiy offhe petltloner shaij be'drawn transferred. As effect and operation the interim order, the petjtioner is not o? posting but aiso to get saiary. It. misconstrusd the order ofthe Court. f<t>r the petjtioner. •cFRfeRh -WR^f ^ %%t •^•^11 ^' ^fH <?TT^| Shrivastava. <J. tNat tner submlts that the order of transfer dated jiled by the petifioner by fiiing writ petition in bn 1/9/2010 to the effect that the effect and [remain stayed tiil the next date of hearing, It of the order, the petitioner has been ^iace of posting as Upper Division Teacher, (Charama) but the saiary Is not being (iterim order passed by the Court. He further Irder, the effect and operation of which was the salary of the petitioner shail be drawn jis being transferred. He submits that as the fhe respondents were under an obJigation to in its true spirit by not only aliowlng the lace of posting but to pay the saiary because ^n the sajd post by virtue of the interim order. (•atjon of which v/as stayed records that the from the place where the petitioner Is bejng pf the sald order was stayed, In the spirit of ^nfy entltied to continue at her present place aj^pears that the respondents have completejy ^^T^TI^—FS/J40—2/20t1—3,50,000. •-••<-XVv.-^'L--^-^^ T -3~ia. ^ivw^., ^-fft-.KFR-, fsr^T^ .^^.;...fl^.:...(^..c..©..l/u5:^^ i%%•••••'^'•^-••^-•^•'••^"••"••••'^l'OO S^ 1q^T ('rt^T) ^n^Twf^^w 'CTl W^Y ^Tlt^ ^ Deepil Ns. ^ ip^T^^f^^n^ -^ Accordingiy, it is directed that recelpt of copy ofthis order, the enti} which,contempt proceedings wouid against the respondents for wiilfui dis|3 Wlth the aforesaid observationis •^N^^f^nwff ^ 'fe1(zt ^f^i^ ^ ^f?T 3?r^i Iwithin a period of one month from the date of 1-e saiary shaii be paid to the petitloner faiiing |)e jnitiated and serious action wouid be taken disbbedience ofthe order ofthe Court. »,the petition is llnaliy disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^r^^r ?NN ^T^^T, ^r^-^Ti^—FS/?40—2/201\— 3,50,000. w