£%% (jg(W/ “\j "‘ ‘ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH’ WRIT PETI'fION No. 32 63 12003 // z b D PETITIONER Rajendra Prasad Gupta, aged ‘\ about 49 years, son of Late Laxmi Prasad Gupta, By caste— Confectionary, a occupation Assistant Teacher, / kg??abhari Q <§v Pradhan Pathak, government girls 9‘ Q; 0;. V Primary School, Rama-nujnagar, $""‘* 6‘“Q <3;‘>.z Tah. Surajpur, Distt. Surguja F x a" Q .5.° .‘x f. (Chhattisgarh) g‘ 'VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through: Secretary, Department of School Education Dau Kalyan Smgh Bhawan Mantralay, Ralpur (C.G.) 2. Sanchalak (Director), Lok Shikshan Department, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. The Collector; District Surguja i , (Chhattisgarh) District Education Officer, District Surguja (C.G.) 5. The Head Master, Government Girls Middle School Block Ramanujnagar, District — Surguja (Chhattisgarh) XI—HC-22 By this writ petition undem Article 226 / 227 of Con§titution of I ludia the petitioner has challe ‘ which th€ p€titioner who is working as Assistant Teacher in Government Girls Middie S 11001. Ramanujnagar has been transfened Eom Ramanujnagar o Baikunthpur, Distt. Koriya. Léaxnsd counsel for thé p Iitioner submits that the petitioner is an Assistant Tcacher and his seniority is maintained distn‘ct—wise, thcrcforc, thc pctitioncr cannot 116 transfcrred out of the distxict. / mspondcnts submits that tho trausfers which wem made on administrative exigency the seniority is not affected. Having hoard the lemed counsel for te parties and having h regaxd to the facts and cimumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that if the petitioner is raising all his grievances and tine same is decided by respondent no.2 that will meet the ends of j'rlstice. It is therefore, directed that 24. 1 1.2003 Shri Sushil Duhey, couns121 for the petitionen Ms. Shmn’n'la Smghai, Dy. Govt. Adv. for the State. Lcarncd counsel for tho ed the order dated 25.08.2003 by allowed to make a representation XI-HC-22 ~Z the peu'tioner is éllowai to make his grievances within m1: days i respondent no.2 m turn will objective manner considering a Wm w®w %a'aq1'Tman%¥r a detailed repxesentation raising all rom today to respondent‘noQ and decide the representation in an 11 the grievances of tg’gpetiticner with a masoned order. Meanwhile, if the petitioner is already not relieved, he should not be 1 ‘elieved till the decision of the representation. With the above direction, t1 1e petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M,W.P. No. also stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. 2982/2003 65 LA. No.96041'2003 [slew