IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.870 of 2009 - - - - 1.THE M.D.,BIHAR INDUSTRIAL AREA DEELOPMENT AUTHORITY, PATNA.. 2. The Secretary, BIADA, Patna. 3.The Regional In charge, Industrial Growth Centre, District, Bhojpur, Ara . . . . . . .Respondent…Appellants. Versus 1.ANJANI KUMAR son of Gajadhar Prasad, Resident of village Bhawanpur P.S.Sadar, District Muzaffarpur. 2.The State of Bihar 3.The Industrial Development Commissioner, Department of industries, Govt. of Bihar. Patna. 4.The Director, Department of Industries, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. . . . . . . .Respondents.. Respondents. For the BIADA : Mr.Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate. Mr. Piyush Lall, adv. For the respondent ; Mr. Basant Kumasr Choudhary, Sr.Adv. Mr.V.K. Singh, Adv. 10 19.05.2011 This appeal was heard at the stage of admission and with the consent of parties, is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself. The present Letters Patent Appeal was filed by the respondent-appellants against the order dated 30.04.2009 passed by the learned single Judge in C.W.J.C.No.5522 of 2009 by which the writ application preferred by the writ-petitioner, respondent no.1 herein, was allowed and the order impugned was set aside by the learned single Judge, basing on the earlier order of this Court. Learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of appellants has contended that even though there is an allegation that the writ petitioner-respondent had misbehaved with some lady, without casing a stigma, his services have been terminated. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of writ-petitioner- 2 respondent argued that after 18 years of service, he has been terminated and it cannot be termed as termination simplicitor and the termination order is also stigmatic and punitive in nature. Having considered the merits of the case, we are of the opinion that there is no material placed before us to show that any departmental proceeding was initiated by the authority. If that be a case, we are of the view that the order of termination has to be set aside and we direct the appellants to reinstate the writ-petitioner respondent (respondent no.1 herein) in service. With regard to the back wages, we are of the opinion that liberty be given to the appellants to pass appropriate order in accordance with law, for which liberty is granted to the respondent no.1 herein to file a fresh show cause within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order in the light of show cause notice issued on 30th January 2008 and further liberty is granted to the official respondents to act upon it and complete the entire exercise within a period 6 weeks from the date of filing of fresh reply. With this observation, the L.P.A. is disposed of. Jay/ (T. Meena Kumari, J) (Akhilesh Chandra,J)