1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. C.A. No. 2827 of 2010 Indrajit v. Sau Sonali _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Mr R.J. Mirza, Advocate for applicant Mr A.P. Tathod, Adv for respondent CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A. P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : 19th September 2011 1. Heard Mr Mirza, learned counsel for applicant/appellant and Mr Tathod, learned counsel for respondent-wife. Prayer is to condone delay of 61 days in filing First Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act. 2. Mr Mirza contends that because of confusion prevailing on account of Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, parties were of the impression that the limitation is of 90 days ad hence, delay has occurred. Mr Tathod is strongly opposing the prayer for condonation of delay. 3. We have perused the affidavit and as we do not see any malafides in the matter, we condone the 2 delay. Office to take further steps accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE joshi