IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 1752 of 2008 Date of Decision: 20. 10. 2008 Municipal Corporation, Patiala .....Appellant Versus M/s Iron Jain Store Patiala ...... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Parminder Singh-I, Advocate for the appellant. **** Ajay Tewari, J. This appeal has been filed against the concurrent findings of the Courts below whereby suit filed by the respondent for recovery of its bills has been decreed. It has been found as a fact by the Courts below that goods were actually purchased for the appellant. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the said goods were purchased without observing the necessary formalities. Be that as it may, it has not been disputed even before me that in fact the goods were purchased for the use of the appellant-Corporation. In this view of the matter the questions proposed do not arise in this appeal. As regards the argument that the purchases were unauthorised, it would be open to the Corporation to initiate action against its officials if circumstances so warrant. Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE October 20, 2008 sunita