CWP No.3781 of 2008 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.3781 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision : 24-4-2009 Ajay Jagga ....Petitioner VERSUS Union Territory, Chandigarh and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.S. KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA NATH SINGH Present: Mr. Mansoor Ali, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Lisa Gill, Advocate, for the respondents. J.S. KHEHAR, J. CM Nos.7376-77 of 2009 CM is allowed. Reply filed by respondents No.1 and 2 as well annexure appended thereto are taken on record subject to all just exceptions. CWP No.3781 of 2008 The primary grievance raised by the petitioner in the instant writ petition relates to movement of vehicles on public roads. Insofar as the aforesaid grievance is concerned in almost all the locations to which specific reference has been made in the instant writ petition, adequate remedial steps have been taken, as is apparent from the reply filed by respondents No.1 and 2. In some cases, it is not possible for allowing movement of vehicles, as the CWP No.3781 of 2008 (O&M) -2- same will infringe the rights of the contractors who have been assigned parking lots in the area concerned. It is, therefore, apparent that primarily the issue canvassed at the hands of the petitioner has been acknowledged and remedied by the respondents as far as possible. In view of the above, we are accordingly satisfied that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. The same is accordingly disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. While commending the initiation of the action at the hands of the petitioner through the instant writ petition, we allow liberty to the petitioner to make similar representations if the occasion so arises, making suggestions to the respondents where free vehicular traffic can continue along side parking areas. (J.S. KHEHAR) JUDGE (UMA NATH SINGH) JUDGE April 24, 2009 manju