IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44001 of 2009 1. BINAY MAHTO @ VINAY MAHTON S/O RAMASHISH MAHTON @ KAMO MAHTON R/O VILL.- RAJOPUR, P.S.- BIND, DISTT.- NALANDA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The bail application of the petitioner was disposed with an observation that he may be enlarged on bail after completing like period of custody as co-accused Pannu Yadav. Learned counsel for the petitioner in this application for modification seeks to persuade this Court that in the nature of the allegation against the petitioner, the Court should reconsider the period of custody of the petitioner. The application for modification is rejected. The application of the petitioner has to be considered with reference to the date on which co-accused Pannu Yadav was granted bail and not any subsequent date on which the co-accused opted to furnish his bail bonds. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)