IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 184 of 2006 Abhishek Kumar ……… Petitioner. Versus Secretary, Cane Development and Sugar Industry Department, Uttarakhand and others .………. Respondents. Mr. Alok Mehra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 3. Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Date of Judgment: 16.06.2010 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous, and that, the same be dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 16.06.2010 16.06.2010 Amit