HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIONjS) Ngh6015 of 200g PETITIONER : Digambar Prasad Dansena S/o. Late ‘ Shri Ghasilal Dansena Aged about 45 years Post- Assistant Teacher R/o. Village ~ Tundri, Post— Tundri, Tahsil Dabhra District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through ' Secretary Department of Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Distn’ct Education Officer, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 3. Biock Education Omcer Block- Dabhra District Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA W S.B. : HON’BLE JUSTICE‘SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI Present: Shti Anil Mouiya, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Page! Lawyer for the State / respondents. ‘ ORDER (Passed on 2 In; day of April, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact and question of law involved in the present Wtit petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another {2006 (II) MPJR—CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.042006. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. 2. In subsequent cases, i.c., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005. (Gapesh Kumm' Verma vs. The State Govt. 0f Chhuttisgarh and another) and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 15- 12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-4-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Seoondaxy Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination. it was clarified that the nomenclature of the Basic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. . has been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in‘Wlit Petition (S.) No.4l30 of 2005’ (Gapesh Kumar Verma vs. The State Govt of Chhattisgarh and another) (Supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kunlar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired D.Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not, No order as to costs. u Sd/- l l Satish K. Agnihotri Amit