IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2921 of 2007 Date of decision: February 19, 2008. Smt. Krishna ...Petitioner(s) v. Dharam Singh & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest. Present: Shri Ashok Goel Barnala, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Raman B. Garg, Advocate for the respondents. ORDER Surya Kant, J. - This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 26.2.2007 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior division), Tohana whereby an application to lead additional evidence, moved by the petitioner – plaintiff, has been partly allowed. Notice of motion was issued and in response thereto, Learned Counsel for the parties have been heard and the impugned order has been perused. The petitioner had previously filed Civil Revision No.390 of 2007 challenging the order dated 22.12.2006 passed by the learned trial court declining her request to lead additional evidence. The said Revision Petition was allowed by this Court vide order dated 23.1.2007 to the extent that as per the petitioner's own stand, she was permitted to produce certified copies of the plaint and the order made in the Civil Suit No.617. It, however, appears that after passing of the aforesaid order, the petitioner – plaintiff came to know that yet another Civil Suit No.457-C of 1989 was also filed by the respondents against her which was later on dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner accordingly moved a fresh application to lead additional evidence so as to enable her to produce the records of the said civil suit also. The learned trial court though permitted the petitioner to summon and place the original records, which has since been produced by the Court Clerk, however, vide the impugned order, it has declined the request to summon the Advocates through whom the above stated suits were filed. After hearing Learned Counsel for the parties and having regard to the plea taken by the petitioner that the respondent – defendants had filed the above stated suits fraudulently behind her back, it appears expedient and in the interest of justice to give an opportunity to her to summon Sarv Shri Laxman Singh Bajia and R.S. Punia, Advocates, through whom the above stated civil suits were allegedly file and got withdrawn. The petitioner, however, shall produce both the witnesses at her own responsibility for which dasti notices may be issued and only one opportunity shall be granted to the petitioner for the said purpose, however, subject to payment of costs of Rs.3,000/- to the respondent – defendants. Dasti February 19, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge