:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO.291 OF 2006 IN C.P.NO.686/1996 WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.797 OF 2005 BIFR 50 OF 1997 Sicom Limited. ..Applicants. Vs. Official Liquidator of Consolidated Containers (India) Ltd. (in liquidation). ..Company. Mr. Prakash Punjabi i/by Prakash Punjabi & Co. for the Applicants. Mrs. Shaikh i/by S.K. Srivastav for the Respondent. Ms. K.V.Gautam, Dy. O.L. present. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE,J. DATED : 24/8/2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. In this application prayer (a), (b) and (c) have already been granted. As regards the prayer (d), Official Liquidator states that the police complaint has been filed regarding the theft. On the point of question of fixing the responsibility, Official Liquidator to make a report as to the progress made in relation to the complaint and setting out the persons to whom the Official Liquidator thinks fit to be made responsible. . As far as prayer clause (e) is concerned, I have :2: perused the affidavit in reply passed by the Official Liquidator. It appears that before monies can be appropriated by the secured creditors, the existing dues of workmen and sales tax dues also required to be paid. Therefore, prayer (e) cannot be granted. Application is therefore, disposed off. Official Liquidator is at liberty to make a report regarding the monies which are lying with the applicants. (R. S. MOHITE, J.)