HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1246 of 2010 Dated: 29-01-2010 Between: B. Srinivas & another. … Petitioners And Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Commissioner & others. … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1246 of 2010 ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioners have questioned the action of respondents 1 and 2 in receiving the applications under B.P.S. scheme, submitted by respondents 3 and 4 in respect of pent-houses in Flat Nos.601 and 602 of Pranav’s Surya Planet Apartment in Survey No.56 of Kondapur village in Ranga Reddy District, as illegal and arbitrary, and sought for consequential directions to the respondents to remove such unauthorised structures. 2. The petitioners are purchasers of flats in the aforesaid apartment complex. In this writ petition, it is alleged that in the 6th floor of the said complex, two pent-houses bearing flat Nos.601 and 602 have been constructed by respondents 3 and 4 without any permission from the competent authority. It is also the case of the petitioners that such constructions are not entitled for regularisation as per the B.P.S. scheme notified by the Government. 3. On instructions, it is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 1 and 2 that the applications filed by respondents 3 and 4 for regularisation of pent-houses bearing flat Nos.601 and 602 are still pending consideration, and in that view of the matter, the petitioners can very well approach the competent authority and place their objections. 4. Whether respondents 3 and 4 are entitled to have the benefit of scheme for regularisation of pent-houses in Flat Nos.601 and 602 or not, is a matter to be considered by the competent authority. As much as the B.P.S. scheme has already been upheld by this Court, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, directing the petitioners to put forth their objections before respondents 1 and 2 within a period of four weeks from today, with regard to regularisation of pent-houses bearing flat Nos.601 and 602, and Respondents 1 and 2 shall take such objections into consideration, before passing appropriate orders on the applications filed by respondents 3 and 4 for regularisation. 5. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 29th January 2010 ajr