IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43808 of 2009 SHAMSUL HAQUE Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 11.12.2009 Heard. The petitioner was granted bail in a case under Railway Properties (Unlawful possession) Act and he absented himself for a period of five and half years. During that period he indulged in similar offence and now the petitioner prays for bail again. Considering that the petitioner had absented himself with specific purpose of grabbing the railway property, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail is rejected. The Railway Judicial Magistrate, Katihar is directed to ensure that the trial of the two cases in which the present petitioner is in custody should be taken up with all ado and disposed of within a period of one year from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of the present order. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J ) BTiwary/