IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1973 of 2008 RAMESHWAR SAH & ANR Versus HEERA SAH & ORS ----------- 2 1/12/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioners. In the opinion of this Court whatever amendments were sought by the defendants-opposite parties in the written statement were at best explanatory in nature in continuation to the stand taken in paragraph nos. 12 and 16 of the written statement. Submission of Mr. Srivastava that proposed amendment would taken away certain admission made in the original written statement is wholly misconceived. As a matter of fact in paragraph 16 of the written statement there is clear indication that whatever alienations were made by the plaintiffs were beyond their share. In that view of the matter, if certain more explanation in this regard have been only sought to be given in the proposed amendment in written statement that by itself cannot be said to be impermissible in law. Consequently, this Court does not 2 find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order. Accordingly, this Civil Revision application being misconceived is hereby dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar