@ L3 HMENDED PETITIGN" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 263 of 2003 Petitioner M/s. Pancha Raghu Taank Ramnivas Sarda & Co. A Regd. Partnership Firm Through Pattner Smt. Shakuntaia Devi Sarda, G.E. Road, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS Respondents (1) Collector (Nazui Branch) Rajnandgaon (C.G.) (2) Municipal Corporation, Through Commissioner, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) (-3) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Public Housing Town Planning & Development, D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 1 & 2 I 227 OF THE 65‘ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR A WRIT IN THE NATURE"OF O CERTIORARI I MANDAMUS PROHIBITION ETC. The petition of the petitioner above named most respectfully a» , sheweth: - 4k; HEGH COURT OF CHHATTISEvARH AT BILASPUR Singie Eench: Hon'bie. Mr. (myrice $a‘rish K. Agnéhcw’i Wrh‘ Pafmon No. 263 of 2003 D : afi Jrioner M/sPamha Raghu Taank §cxmmvas Sarda & Cd. Versus Qesponcéams Cal§ecwr (Nazui Brunch) §ajnandgaen & afhers Shri 3hqshank Dubey, 5enior Counsei wh‘h Neeiab Dubey, counsel for 'f’na pefifioner. Shri AS. Kachhawaha, Governmenf Advocate itor fhz respondems No. 1 and 3/5‘fafe. Shri Amnd Shukla, counse! for The respondem No.2. ORDER. (Passed on 10* of November, 2006) The pe?§?i0nar Regisfered Parmership Firm has fiied fhis pa‘fifion impugning ’rhe order \damd 16.09.2001 (Annexur‘e W6) w§1ereby we pmi‘rioner was direa’reé f0 hand over 15% Le. 12272 Square fee? of “rhe {and in respecf of p!of No. 239/1 in favour of fhe Municipal Corporafion, Rajnangdaon. . This Court by order daféd 04.02.2004, gramed inferim order noT f0 dis—possess ‘rhe perifioner from The Rand in ques’?ion. The §efifioner accordingiy confirmed in possession of ‘rhe disputed land. . During pendency of fhis pa'i'i‘i’ion Ruiz 10 of The ChMi'fisgarh Nagar Paiiku (Regisfraiion of Colonizér, Terms wad Comiifions} Ruiesi 1998 4 . k) y? was qmend'ecf by no’rifica’rior: dated 14.07.2006. The nc’rificafiou reads as under. “1. Af’rer sub—wig (1) of The fomawing proviso, shal! be inserted, mmaiy :- “Provided any icmd reserved for ‘fhe persms belanging 1‘0 acanomicaHy wgaker secfions which had beey) handad aver fa i‘he Municiwi Carpom‘i'iory/Municipai CounciVNagar‘ Panchaya’r, im accordance wifh app€§cabie ru§e a? fhm' .Tima by a coéonizér‘ far whid‘; 'me cos? haa‘ bm‘ haan paid 1'0 "‘rha cobnizer by fhe mumcipaH‘ry and which iqnd is vacan‘? may be releasad by “the mumdpaHfy in favour of a‘he colcnizer m1 depoa‘h‘ of shaker fee a? “fhe mfes prescribed above." 2. in sub—ruie 17 nf mie 10 ‘riqe foiiowing ska” be subsii‘mTed, acmeiy :- “The Commissioner‘i’Chief Muhicipai Officer of ihe concerned municipqiiiy s'naii coiled” fhe shaker fee for fhe municipai m‘eo whioh‘shoii be éeposifed'by ogem‘ng a eeperm‘e occoun'i’ which ' Sinai! be under ‘ihe municipaiii‘y concerned anci for The area cu? side 'Hrae muraicipai area bm‘ iocm‘ed wii'hin The pia'nning area of ‘rim concerned fown, The Coiiecfor shali coiieci sheiier fee which snail be deposifed by opening a separcd‘e accoun‘l' which snail be under fhe Coiiecfor. The funds deposi'i'ed Mine said accounTs shuii be ufiiized in accordance wifh The insfrucfions iséued by f’ne Sm‘re i 4m Governmen? from Time To Time." In View of fhe amended rules, The pe‘ri‘rioner undermkes Tmieposi? sheh‘er fee a? The mks prgscribed under ‘rhe Rmes. .v Shri Anand Shukia, learned counsei appearing for The Municipal Corporafion agres wi'fh ’rhe submission made by Ieamed counsel appearing for The pe‘ri'rioner and submi‘rs #hcd' ‘Hnz Municipai Corporm'ion has no objection if Tina pefi‘rion is disposed of wi‘ih i‘rie direciion Tina? fhe pefifioner To deposii’ The sheH’er fee a'r fhe ra'i'e of fine above prescribed rules. , In View of fine above—sm‘ied facTs and submission made by The parfies, ‘fhe pefi‘rioner is permi‘H‘ed f0 deposif ‘i’he sheh‘er‘ fee cw ihe mfe prescribed under amended Ruies, 1998, wi'ihin a period of four weeks. Learned counsel appearing for 'rhe Municipal Corporation, Rajnondgoon and Sfa‘fe submi? The? f‘ne warranf of possession shall no? be execuied in view of fhe-subsequem"development and in case of deposif of shei'rer fee. . As a resul‘l' and foregoing reasons, fhis pe‘ri‘rion sfands disposed of. There shall be no order as 1'0 cos'rs. / Sd/- er ] saukh K. Agmhom l Judge %bm