IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 2111 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.8.2009 Kamlesh .. Petitioner v. State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Advocate for the petitioner. .. Rajesh Bindal J. The petitioner, who is accused in FIR No. 191 dated 12.2.2009, registered at Police Station, Sadar Hissar, under Sections 372, 373, 366, 376 IPC, has approached this court challenging the order dated 16.7.2009 framing charge against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that from a perusal of the material on record with the court including the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., no case is made out against the petitioner on the basis of which charge could be framed. A perusal of the impugned order shows that charge against the petitioner was framed under Section 372 IPC. If the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. is considered, there is a specific reference regarding the role of the petitioner being indulging in the trading of girls for immoral activities. At the time of framing of charge, only prima facie material was to be seen which, in my opinion, is available on record. The statement of the prosecutrix cannot be said to be of the co-accused on which much reliance is not placed. Accordingly, I do not find any merit in the present petition and the same is dismissed. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 26.8.2009 mk