FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4485 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.___ OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2009 [ V/S.] _____________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court s orders : ’ or directions and Registrar s’ : Court s or Judge s orders ’ ’ orders : _____________________________________________________________________________________ Mr.Bharat Vaishnawa for petitioner Mr.Basant Trilokani i/b. Jhangiani Narla & Associates for respondents S.V.Gajre APP CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 8th JANUARY, 2010. PC :- 1. Heard Mr.Vaishnav for applicant and Mr.Trilokani for original accused. Mr.Trilokani contends that there is a delay of 3 years and 251 days in making the present application, seeking leave to appeal against an order dated 4th October 2005. He submits that the applicant has not been able to point out anything much less a bonafide reason for not being able to approach this Court earlier. In these circumstances, he submits that the application be dismissed. 2. On the other hand, Mr.Vaishnav points out that in the application it has been pointed out as to how the applicant has been prevented from approaching this Court earlier. After a perusal of the entire application and more particularly the cause set out in paras 6 to 9 thereof, I am satisfied that sufficient cause has been made out for condoning the delay in preferring this application. The delay is, therefore, condoned. Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Let the main Criminal Application be now numbered by the Registry and placed for admission in due course. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.)