S.B. Criminal Misc.4th Bail Application No.1243/2010 Rajudin vs. State of Rajasthan Dated of order: 26.02.2010 HON'BLE MR. MAHESH BHAGWATI,J. Mr. M.F. Baig, for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Fauzdar, Public Prosecutor for the State. This order governs the disposal of fourth bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. by Mr. M.F. Baig Advocate on behalf of the applicant Rajudin pertaining to F.I.R. No. 493/2008 of Police Station Kotwali, District Alwar, in the offences under Sections 143, 148, 149, 323, 325 and 307 of IPC. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has canvassed that apart other witnesses the injured PW-14 Vijay and Medical Officers PW-10 Dr. Rajendra Juneja who is found to have medically examined the injured as also PW-11 Dr. Sanjeev Chopra who operated the injured have been examined by the prosecution but none of the Doctors have stated the injury sustained by Vijay to be dangerous to life. The petitioner has been in custody for the last more than a year and the trial of the case is likely to take time, hence, he may be granted indulgence of bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application on the ground that this is the fourth bail application filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner and there is no change in fact situation, as such, keeping in view the gravity of injuries, the petitioner should not be granted indulgence of bail. 5. Having reflected over the submissions made at the bar and scanned the relevant material available on record, it is noticed that the first bail petition was dismissed on 02.03.2009 by detailed order. It is tangible from the statements of injured PW-14 Vijay that he remained admitted in the Hospital for about 6-7 months and remained unconscious, hence, I do not find any good ground to change my earlier view, and the fourth bail petition filed on behalf of the petitioner Rajudin also stands dismissed for those very reasons which were enumerated in the first bail order. (MAHESH BHAGWATI),J. Mak/- s-5