IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7524 of 2010 GOPI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.03.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act is that the First Information Report is against unknown. His name has transpired on confession of co-accused Indrajit Kumar alias Chhotu. Counsel for the State submits that the bail of the latter has been rejected in Cr. Misc. No. 20294 of 2009. The order rejecting bail of Indrajit Kumar alias Chhotu notices confession of another co-accused present in the car that it was Abhinash and Mikki (Rickey) who assaulted and killed the deceased. In absence of any discussion in the impugned order from the case diary of an active role attributed to the petitioner in the confession at the time of assault, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJM Patna City in Agamkuan PS Case No. 34 of 2009. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)