HI6H COURT OF CHHATHS6ARH AT BIUSPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 2972 of 2009 1. 2. Dinesh Kumar S/o Tirathraj, Aged about 25 years, R/o Viilage Obari, Police Station Bal-an-ipu", Oistrict Surguja (C.G.~) Pankaj Kumar (Supta, S/o Dev Prasad Supta, Aged abouf 25 years, R/o Vii'age Bhanora, Police S+ation Bflirampur, bistrict Surguja (C.&.) Versus |T< ']/ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Panchayat &. Gra.m'm Vikas Vibhsg, O.K.S. Bhawan, Rdpur, bistrict Raipur (C.G.) 2. Coilector, Syrguja, District Surguja (C.6.5 3. Janpad Panchayat, Balrampur through its Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Bolrampur, District Surguja (C.6.) 4. i-hief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Ambikapur, Surguja, bistrict Surguja (C.G.) 5. Commissioner, Rojgar Suarantee Yojna, Office of beyelopment Commissioner, ftojgar &jarantee Yojna, Raipur, Gistrict Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTEQN OF INDIA Single Bench: Hon'bleMr. Justice Satish K.Agnihotri. Present: Shri Mtmoj Paranjape, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur.Dy. A.S.with Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer fpr the State/respondents. 4. ORDERfORALy (Passed on 25th Day of June, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, submits thdt the petitioner does not want to contest this matter on merits, at this stage. Howeyer, learned counsel appearing for the petitionerseeks liberty of this Court to make a representation afresh before respondent No.5 for consideration of this case on merits, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within astipulated period. 2. Shri yashwant Singh Thakur, by. A.6. with Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondentssubmits that in the event, the petitionep^files a fresh representation before respondent No.@, the sameshdll be considered and decided in accordance with !dw; on its own merifs as expeditiously as possible preferably withjn a period of four weeks from the date of receiptof the repr'esentation. 4. In yiew of foregoing, dccording to ledrned counsel appearing for ttie petitioner, nothing survivesin this matter for adjudication. Without expressing anyopinion on merits of the case, 1+ie writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge