© <-\r\< c' IN THE HON*BLE HIGH COURT OF CE2HATTISGARH AT BILASPUR< PETITIONER APPELLANT" WRIT PETITION N0. 5^15' /2004 - Lalji son of Mohar Sai, Resident of village Bhathari TahsU Mungeli, Disfct< Bilaspur (c,Gt)^ VERSUS ^ RESPONDEI'H'S NON-APPLICANTS ^' ^y^v .^^•y ^O' ^A ^•^'J.' <?^ .^ ^ l* Prabhu Dayal son of Timothi R/o<» Village Bhathari, Tahsil Mungeli Distt^ Bilaspur (C^G*) , 2< The Revenue Board Chhafctisgarh Bilaspur (C.G.)» 3< The Naib Tahsildar, Mungeli, District Bilaspur (c^G^), 4^ The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenua) R Mungeli, District Bilaspur (C<G<|)^ ..^;- ' ^ ^RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONTITIffTION OF INDIA s/ s^ ^•FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS. ORDERS. DIRECPIONS TO DO ^f •3TUSTZCE IN THE MATTER. ^ ^ .^.\7_^^ ^f- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.515 OF 2004 PETITIONER Lalji Versus RESPONDENTS Prabhu Dayal & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- None for the petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 9th day of February, 2011) The matter is called for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. 2) In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. '•^ci Q / Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge