1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8271 OF 2006 State of Maharashtra ....Petitioner. V/s. Mr. R.B. Sharma & Anr. ....Respondents. ---- Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni, Associate Advocate General with Mr. S.R. Nargolkar, Assistant Government Pleader for the Petitioner. CORAM: H.S. BEDI, C.J., & V.M.KANADE, J. DATE : December 19, 2006 P.C. Mr. Kumbhakoni, the learned Associate Advocate General, has vehemently argued that the part of the order regarding upgradation of the ACRs of the Respondent was a matter unknown to law and, as such, interference was called for. We are, however, of the opinion that on an over all appreciation of the order and the additional fact that the Respondent has been litigating for decades together, no 2 interference is called for in the matter, though the dismissal of this Petition should not be treated as an endorsement of the view of the tribunal with regard to the upgradation of ACRS. We further direct that the time granted by the Tribunal for compliance of its order be extended by a period of two months from today. The Petition is accordingly dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE V.M. KANADE, J.