IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35981 of 2009 TARUN KUMAR YADAV @ TARUN PRASAD YADAV S/O DEO NANDAN PRASAD, VILL-CHAK JOHARA,P.S-HILSA,DISTT- NALANDA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.10.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. Considering the nature of allegation and the petitioner’s period under custody for an offence u/s 379 I.P.C., this Court would direct for his release on bail on the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall henceforth report on every first Monday of the month before the Officer In-charge who will record his attendance and submit it in court regularly. It is made clear that even a single day’s failure to remain present before the Officer In-charge would entail the consequence of cancellation of bail. (ii) The bail of the petitioner in this case would remain subject to his not being made accused now onwards in any case of similar nature relating to theft of electrical wire. In other words, if the petitioner again is made an accused in any case of this nature, his present bail shall 2 stand cancelled. (iii) One of the bailors will be either of his parents or his wife. (iv) The petitioner shall remain present in course of trial on day to day basis and his absence during the course of trial on two consecutive dates shall automatically entail the consequence of cancellation of this bail. Subject to the aforementioned conditions, the abovenamed petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bihar Sharif in Rajgir P.S.Case No.141/2008. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/