IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.647 of 2011 CHANDAN KUMAR @ CHANDAN MANDAL @ ABHISHEK MANDAL @ ABHISHEK KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.1.2011. Heard. I have already detailed the facts of the case and on that account the prayer for bail of the present petitioner by way of renewal could not be allowed. The same is dismissed. It appears from the rejection order that the doctor who was to attend the proceedings of the trial before the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, Bhagalpur in Sessions Case No.1247 of 2008 could not appear on account of his wife falling ill. It is expected that the doctor has now normal circumstances in his life and he had either appeared or he could appear in future for testifying to the part of the investigation which was carried by his assistance and further that the learned trial Judge winds up the proceedings of the trial quickly. Considering the part of the trial and its hearing which has to be taken up, the 2 court again fixes five months time for the court below for concluding it, which shall be counted either from the day on which a copy of the order is received by him or the same is produced by any one interested in the trial. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)