IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7823 of 2008 NOHBAT LAL @ NAHBAT LAL @ NAHBAT LAL HARIJAN & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 23.7.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. No one appears for the State. The petitioners pray for anticipatory bail in a complaint case under Sections 323 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegations are vague and general in nature. It is pointed out that the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are the father-in-law and mother-in-law respectively of the alleged victim girl-complainant whereas petitioner no. 3 is the husband’s sister of the complainant who is living separately in a different village. It is further submitted that although allegation has been made for snatching certain silver ornaments by petitioner no. 3 in the complaint petition but no cognizance has been taken under Section 379 by the Court below. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that the petitioners (1) Nohbat Lal @ Nahbat Lal @ Nahbat Lal Harijan, (2) Rupa Bati Devi and (3) Kaushalya Devi in the event of their arrest/surrender in the Court below within four weeks from today, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 7000/- (seven thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. 749 ( c) of 2007 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj subject to other applicable conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. P. Kumar (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)