( “ F / g a l @ A IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILAsPUR W.PsNo. I] 6'5 /200§« (3.3.) PETITIONER /&§Amavataar Tiwari, .S/o Shri Bhagvat Prasad Tiwari, aged about 48 years, R/o Tikari para Takhatpur,, Bilaspur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh , Through Secretary , Education Department , D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Director of public Instruction Pensionbada Raipur (C.G.) ; WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226OF THE N COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH coURT OF CHHAmsGARH AT mLASPUk w. P. (s) No. 1168 of 200/ Pe‘rifioner : Rnmnvnhar Tiwari Versus kespondenfs $1'a1’e of Chhaffisgarh & momm- Sivgl: Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Salish K. Agnihofr‘. Mr. Kumaresh Tiwari, Advocm'e for fha pafitioner. 5m1'. Anju Ahuja, Depufy Gavel-mum? Advom‘l'c far fhe Sh'l'e/responden'rs. O R D E R (Passed on 1his 28*” Day of February, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for The pcfi'rioner submifs mat fhz petitioner is working as Assistant Teacher/Lectumr. The petitionzr obtained B. Ed. Examination certificate on 14-7-1992, on his own expenses. ' Imrned counsei appearing for the petitioner suhmits that the question involved, herein asto whether the teacher, who obtained B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses is entitled to two advance increments. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwont Km Bhoradwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation. burg and another {2006 (n) MPJR—CG 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwant Kumor Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, burg and another (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examination Certificate on their own a, expenses, are covered by fhe circular dafed 24.12.98 icawd by fhe SfaTe Govemmenf of Madhya Pradesh. 4. Learned counsel for fhe pefi'rioner further submifs ‘rhn'r 'rhe facts and quesfion of law invoIVed in 1he prewnf cnqe are squarefy covered by decision of ‘Hnis Cour-t in fhe cm? of Yashwom Kunm- Bhomd’woj Vs. Municipal Corporation. burg and ano‘l'her (Supra), fo which learned counsel appearing for the respondeni's fairly concedes mid agrees wifh fhe avermen‘r mode by learned counsel appearing for flue peiifioner. 5. Accordingly, iine wrif pe'l'ifion is allowed in 'ierms of fhe order passed in inc case of Yoshwom Kumor Bhorodwaj Vs. Municipal Corporo‘i'ion, Durg and anofher (Supra), wbjeci io verification of 'rhe fac'r as fo whether ihe pe'rii'ioner has acquired B. Ed. Examination Cer'rifi'cafe on his own expenses as per fhe circulars daied 24.12.1998 di 1.3.1999 and furiher wheiher he has been paid 'iwo advance i i i l Satish K. Agnihotri I l Judge increments or not. No order as to costs. ‘ ‘ sw- f l 5ubhash