1 wp5688 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET WRIT PETITION NO.5688 OF 2011 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.Drupad Patil for the Petitioner None for the respondent CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : AUGUST 5,2011 P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is the original plaintiff. The learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the decision of the Apex Court in case of Nabab Singh Vs. Indrajit Kaur in Civil Appeal no.2735 of 1999. 2 The suit is at the stage of recording of evidence. The order impugned is purely interlocutory. Hence, at this stage no interference can be made in a petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India. In the event, the decision in the 2 wp5688 suit is adverse to the petitioner, it will be always open for the petitioner to challenge the impugned order while preferring an appeal against the decree. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE