IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.63446-M of 2006 Trilok Chand ...PETITIONER VERSUS State of U.T.Chandigarh ...RESPONDENT Crl.Misc.No.63449-M of 2006 Gagandeep Singh ...PETITIONER VERSUS State of U.T.Chandigarh ...RESPONDENT DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 24, 2006 CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr.Kailash Chander, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Hemant Bassi, Standing Counsel for U.T.Chandigarh. ... This order shall dispose of two Crl.Misc.petitions bearing Crl.Misc.No.63446-M of 2006 filed by petitioner Trilok Chand and Crl.Misc.No.63449-M of 2006 filed by petitioner Gagandeep Singh under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.315 dated 25.8.2006 registered under Sections 420/120-B IPC at Police Station Sector 34, Chandigarh. I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR. Counsel for the respondent-State submitted that during the investigation, it was found that petitioner Trilok Chand posing himself to be Crl.Misc.No.63446-M of 2006 & anr. -2- Harminder Sharma and petitioner Gagandeep Singh posing himself to be Rocky, had cheated the complainant and others by charging an amount of Rs.5.82 lacs on the pretext that the said amount would be adjusted against the rent to be paid to those persons after installation of towers in their premises. Actually, no such towers were ever installed nor there was any such company got registered for the purpose. Keeping in view the nature of serious allegations against the petitioners and the material collected during the investigation against them, I am not inclined to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Dismissed. October 24, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE