HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petitioii^io. 1112 of2008 PETITTONER : Jairaj Smgli Nagwanshi aged about 61 years, S/o Late Jitendra Smgh retired collection Supei-visor office of Dy. Milk Conmiissioner Integrated Dairy Development Project Kawardha (CG) R/o Ward No< 3, Gangi Para., Khairagarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG). ^'ERSUS IE.SPQNDENTS : 1. The State ofCG, Tlirougli the Secretaty Vetermary & Dairy Mmistry^ DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. Director Vetenar)7 & Diary Deptt. C.G Raipur 3< Dy. Milk Commissioner, Integrated Dairy Development Project Kabirdham (CG). 4. Asstt. Director, (PR) Treasury, Accounts and Pension, Raipur (CG). (WRTT PETTTION IJNDER .WTICTE 226 OF THE CONSTmmON OF INDIA) (SB: Hoii'ble Mr. K. Agiiiliotn., .1.) Preseiit : Shi'i Somkaitit Veiiiia, Advocate fbr the petitioner Shii A.S. Kacmiwaha, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on 21st ofFe'omary, 2WSS) 1. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State ofChliattisgarh and others) and other comiected matters, directed the Conmiittee to consider the matter of the retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were iiivolved. The Committee was constitiited by the State Goverimieiit, pursuant to the order 19.06.1006 passed iii W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keia Bai C.handrAffl- Vs. State Govenmient and others) and order dated 15.02.2008 passed in W.P. No. 1323/2006 (Navin Kumar Bisariya Vs. State of Cliliattisgarh and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covei-ed by the judgment and order dated 31st of Januaiy, 2008 passed m W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baynath Mandal Vs. The State of CMiattisgarh and others) and other comiected matters, as submitted by the leamed coimsel appearmg for the parties. 2. Tliis petitioii is accordmgly disposed ofin the same temis i.e. the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Coniiiiittee, within ^ ^ i^s-y •\ a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order» Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner aiid the officers concenied, within a fiirther period of 15 da-ys, The Coimiiittee shall consider and pass order, in accordaiice with law, affordiiig proper opportumty of hearing to the petitioiier The petitioiier aiid th@ offieers coiicenied may file additional documeiits, ifnecessary. The entire exercise, including paymesit of retira! dues, if any, to the petitioner, be completed withm a period of four months fi'om the date of receipt of a copy of this orcler. Oiie extra copy ofthe papers ofthe petition shall be supplied by the leamed comi^el appearmg for the petitioner to Slm A.8. Kachliwaha, Deputy Advocate General, for onward transmissioii to the conmiittee. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sahu