IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21555 of 2010 SUNIL JEE @ SUNIL KUMAR RAJAK @ BABAN BAITHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04/ 29.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. It appears from perusal of the record that two accused persons, who are suspected members of extremist group, were apprehended and in whose possession fire arms and ammunitions were recovered. The apprehended persons disclosed the names of his associates. In course of investigation name of the petitioner came in this case when he was arrested in connection with other case. The impugned order of the learned Sessions Judge reveals that petitioner carries criminal history and the concerned police station also corroborates the aforesaid fact. No doubt, petitioner carries criminal history of 13 cases and he is said to be an active member of extremist group but considering this aspect of the matter that the present case has been registered only under the provisions of Arms Act and 17 Criminal Law Amendment Act and for the aforesaid occurrence, petitioner has sufficiently been punished by remaining in judicial custody since 1.7.2008 and moreover, the apprehended accused persons have already been granted privilege of bail by another bench of this court which has been asserted by the petitioner in paragraph 15 of the bail petition. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of the petitioner, I direct the petitioner( Sunil Jee - 2 - @ Sunil Kumar Rajak @ Baban Baitha) to be released on bail in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case no. 127 of 2006 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000-/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri M.A. Karim, Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jamui subject to the condition that the petitioner shall present himself before the concerned police station on 15th of each month till the disposal of the above stated case and furthermore, he shall appear before the trial court on each and every date in person and if he makes absent himself from the court proceedings without any reasonable reason then, in that event, the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and furthermore, one of the sureties must be close relative of the petitioner and holder of the landed property shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J))