IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40784 of 2009 RAMADHAR JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 8.1.2010. Heard. The petitioner came to the office of the Circle Officer, Mushahari with a receipt for getting the seal of his office put over it. A candidate, peon produced the document before the C.O. who grew suspicious and got enquiry conducted and it was found as per the report of the Halka Karamchari that no such receipt had been issued by him and that the document was forged and fabricated. This is how the FIR was lodged under various Sections of the IPC. The contention is that such documents are too easily available in the market and that no benefit was obtained by creating the documents. The next contention was that if at all the petitioner had to get a seal of the C.O. put over the document, he could very well have created the seal also. The contentions of the petitioner could indicate as to what could be the propensity of a criminal mind in forging the document of the nature as alleged and to what shameless extent a forgerer could go. Considering the above, I refuse the prayer for anticipatory bail, the same is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )