1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 943 OF 2010 Dnyaneshwar /so Pandurang Jorle .. PETITIONER VERSUS Pandurang s/o BAlaram Jorle & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. M.R. Andhale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. C.K. Shinde, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 23rd MARCH, 2010 PER COURT : 1 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that as the trial court has decided the suit itself, the petition is rendered infructuous. Hence, the petition stands rejected. The petitioner may have liberty to raise the point involved in the petition at appellate stage. 2 In view of dismissal of petition, pending civil application, if any, stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp943.10.odt