1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4925 OF 2010 Anand Pratishathan Latur, Through its Secretary, Mohanrao S/o Dadarao Hake, Age : Major, Occu. : Secretary, R/o Latur, Tq. & Dist. Latur. .. .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, School Education and Sports Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2. The Director of Education (School Education), M. S. Mumbai. 3. The Deputy Director of Education, Latur. 4. The Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Latur. .. .. Respondents Shri Ganesh V. Mohekar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri N. B. Khandare, Govt. Pleader for the Respondents No. 1 to 3. 2 CORAM : P. V. HARDAS AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 09TH JUNE, 2010. ORAL JUDGMENT [Per P. V. HARDAS, J. ] : 01. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 02. The grievance of the petition in this petition is that the proposal submitted by the petitioner for opening a primary school (Urdu Medium) is pending consideration with the respondents. 03. In that light of the matter, therefore, we deem it appropriate to decide this petition finally at this stage. We have heard Mr. Mohekar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Khandare, learned Government Pleader who accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Mohekar seeks leave to delete respondent No. 4 as no relief is claimed against the respondent No. 4. Leave granted at the risk of the petitioner. 04. Since the proposal is said to be pending, we allow this 3 petition and direct the respondents to decide the proposal submitted by the petitioner, if pending, in accordance with law, within a period of two months from today and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioner. 04. Rule is thus made absolute on the above terms with no order as to costs. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [ P. V. HARDAS, J.] bsb/June 10