1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 519 OF 2008 DIST.: PUNE Arjun Dhondiba Sapkal ...Petitioner Versus Ganpatlal Zumberlal Varma ...Respondent. Mr. S.M. Gorwadkar for the Petitioner Mr. Jayesh B. Kocheta for the Respondent. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI, J. DATE: OCTOBER 7, 2008 P.C.:- A decree for specific performance has been passed by the trial Court. An application under Section 47 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 was made, requesting the Court to hold that the decree passed was not capabel of execution, as it was a nullity. 2. It was contended before the Court that a decree was passed to execute a sale-deed, and the sale-deed could not have been executed in view of bar which made such an alienation void. This was a 2 question which should have been raised in the suit during the trial, and, in any case, during the process of execution, the executin Court cannot go beyond the decree, which is the settled positon of law. 3. For these reasons, I do not find merit in this Civil Revision Application. It is accordingly dismissed. BILAL NAZKI, J.