THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.C.No.216 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner was appointed as a Technical Assistant in the NREG Scheme at Narpal Mandal, Anantapur District, was removed from service through proceedings, dated 09.07.2009. He filed W.P.No.10436 of 2010. The writ petition was disposed of, in terms of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.14121 of 2009, prescribing the procedure to be followed for termination. This contempt case is filed stating that the respondent did not comply with the directions. The respondent filed counter-affidavit. It is stated that after the disposal of the writ petition, the petitioner was reinstated into service, even while the enquiry was in progress. It is further stated that after conducting enquiry, the Project Director, issued proceedings, dated 30.06.2011 withdrawing the contract of appointment of petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj. This Court indicated the procedure to be followed by the respondent, in the disciplinary proceedings instituted against the petitioner. Though it is alleged that the procedure was not followed, the respondent has stated that as many as four notices of enquiry were issued, and ultimately, after conducting the enquiry, the petitioner was removed through order, dated 30.06.2011, on the ground of misappropriation. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by the said order, he has to institute separate proceedings. The Contempt Case is accordingly closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dated: 21.07.2011 GJ