IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2010 / 8TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 16602 of 2010(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- KADEEJA.P., W/O.ABOOBAKKER, AGED 49 YRS., CHELAKKODAN VEEDU, ALANELLUR, PART TIME CASUAL SWEEPER, ALANELLUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PALAKKAD DIST. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.SREEJITH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, ALANELLUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, ALANELLUR, PALAKKAD DIST. 2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVT. LOCAL SELF GOVT. SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD. 4. THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT, TRIVANDRUM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. ARAVINDKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.16602 OF 2010 (A) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that she is a part time sweeper in the first respondent Panchayat. According to her, she is entitled to have the service regularized in terms of the provisions contained in GO(P). No.501/05 Fin. dated 25.11.2005. Claiming that she be regularized, she had approached this court by filing WP(c). No.34808/09. That writ petition was disposed of by Ext.P6 judgment directing the Panchayat to make necessary proposals for regularization of her service. It is submitted that in pursuance there of, Panchayat has made Ext.P5 proposal to the 4th respondent and the 4th respondent has not so far submitted the proposal to the second respondent for final orders. Complaining of delay on the part of the 4th respondent as above, the writ petition is filed. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, she is entitled to the benefit of regularization in terms of the provisions contained in GO(P). No.501/05 Fin. dated 25.11.2005, necessarily, the matter to be finalised. WPC.No.16602/2010 :2 : 3. From the pleadings it would appear that the Panchayat has already made a proposal to the 4th respondent. Therefore the 4th respondent has to submit the same to the 2nd respondent and it is for the 2nd respondent to pass final orders in the matter. Therefore I direct that on the production of a copy of this judgment, the 4th respondent shall process Ext.P5 proposal made by the Ist respondent and forward the same to the 2nd respondent for final orders. This shall be done by the 4th respondent within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment and on such receipt the 2nd respondent shall pass final orders in the matter within 8 weeks thereafter. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with copy of this writ petition before respondents 2 and 4 for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No.16602/2010 :3 :