IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 12694 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: May 28, 2010. Nasib and another ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mrs. Baljit Mann, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S.Goripuria, D.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.69 dated 21.04.2010, under Sections 354/506 IPC, registered at Police Station Badshahpur, District Gurgaon. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 03.05.2010 passed the following order:- “Crl.M.No.22797 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRM No.M-12694 of 2010 Crl.M.No.M-12694 of 2010 Argues that main allegations against petitioners are for offence under Section 354 IPC, which is bailable one. Further argues that no offence under Section 506 IPC is made out against petitioners and more over co-accused against whom offence under Section 506 IPC is made out, have already been granted benefit of anticipatory bail by learned Sessions Judge, Gurgaon. Further argues that due to dispute between the two communities in the village, petitioners have been falsely implicated and they are ready to join the investigation. Notice of motion for 28.5.2010. However, petitioners are directed to join the investigation and in case they are arrested, they shall be released on interim bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have already joined the investigation pursuant to said order dated 03.05.2010. It has also been stated by learned counsel for the State that petitioners have joined the investigation and that they are no more required for any custodial interrogation. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of Nasib and Farid is accepted and order dated 03.05.2010 granting interim bail in favour of the petitioners is, hereby, made absolute subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. 2 CRM No.M-12694 of 2010 The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) May 28, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 3