: 1 : APPW-315-331-11 Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.315 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2392 OF 2010 Ramkumar Bramhadatta Agarwal ... Applicant V/s. The Department of Home Affairs, Mantralaya, Mumbai & Ors. ... Respondents ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.331 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2396 OF 2010 Ravindra N. Sakla ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra, Thru’ State CID, Pune Branch Sangam Bridge, Pune & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Niranjan Mundargi for the Applicant in Cr. Appln./315/2011. Mr. Mahesh Jethmalani, Sr. Counsel, i/b. Rohit Mahadik and Prashant Pawar, for the Applicant in Cr. Appln./331/2011. Dr. F.R. Shaikh, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM: V.M. KANADE & A.M. THIPSAY, JJ. DATED : 8 TH SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. These are the applications for fixing an early date of hearing of the Criminal Writ Petition Nos.2392 of 2010 and 2396 of 2010. This Court has, : 2 : APPW-315-331-11 by order dated 19th November, 2010, granted Rule only in respect of prayer clauses (c) and (d). The grievance of the Applicant in Criminal Application No.315 of 2011 and the Applicant in Criminal Application No.331 of 2011 is that the Respondent No.4 and Respondent No.5 therein, respectively, illegally detained the Applicants in the Police Station, though the summonses which were issued to appear before it in offences were purely bailable offences. Since this is a short point involved, in our view, main Petitions can be heard expeditiously. 3. Criminal Applications, accordingly, are allowed. 4. Place the Criminal Writ Petition Nos.2392 of 2010 and 2396 of 2010 on the final hearing board on 3rd October, 2011. 5. The Respondents to file their reply within three weeks from today and serve a copy of the reply on the Petitioners. 6. The Criminal Applications, accordingly, are disposed of. (A.M. THIPSAY, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)