IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11533 of 2010 BADMIYAN WIFE OF SARYUG RESIDENT OF CHAKBINDA, BABU BAZAR, P.O. ANISABAD, P.S. GARDANIBAG, DISTRICT PATNA Versus 1. THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BUDH MARG, PATNA. 2. THE ADMINISTRATOR, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PATNA. 3. THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION. 4. THE Municipal COMMISSIONER, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PATNA. ----------- 02. 23.07.2010 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add the Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of her grievance as highlighted in the writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the newly added respondent no. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent – Corporation submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall be considered without further delay. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with 2 the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)