IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 5TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 14TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 24172 of 2011(V) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- MOHAMMED RASEEL T., S/O. ABDUL HAMEED T., ANUGRAHAM HOUSE, VACHUTHODI, KULATHUR, CALICUT AIRPORT P.O., KONDOTTY, MALAPPUARM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., PIN - 673 635, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THECOMMISSIONER FOR ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS, HOUSING BOARD BUILDINGS, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, VEDA VYASA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, PONNEMPDAM P.O., KARADPARAMBA, MALAPPUARM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC., UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 24712/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE HALL TICKET OF THE PETITIONER FOR THE FIRST SEMESTER EXAMINATION OF BTECH COURSE. P2: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT LODGED BY THE PETITIONER AND OTHERS. P3: COPY OF THE ADMIT CARD ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT. P4: COPY OF THE ALLOTMENT MEMO ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT. P5: COPY OF THE PRESS RELEASE OF THE SECOND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 24172 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of September, 2011 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner after completing his plus two course he joined B.Tech course in Sengunthar Engineering College in Tamil Nadu. At the time of joining the said college, petitioner has produced all the certificates in original. Subsequently he and other students came to know that the College did not have approval of the AICTE or the University and therefore he discontinued the course. In 2011 the petitioner applied for Engineering Entrance Examinations in response to the notification issued by the 2nd respondent and got selected and was eventually allotted to the 3rd respondent College. However the difficulty of the petitioner is that since original certificates are still retained by the College in Tamil Nadu he is unable to produce the original certificates at the time of joining. W.P.(C) No. 24172 OF 2011 :2 : It is stated that unless the certificates are produced the 3rd respondent will not admit him to the college and therefore this writ petition is filed with the following prayer. “A writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction to the respondents to admit the petitioner and allow to remit fee on the basis of the copy of the original certificates subject to the production and verification of the original certificates of the petitioner.” 2. If, as stated by the petitioner the said certificates are withheld by the Tamil Nadu College and a reasonable time is needed for production, I feel it is only fair that the petitioner is given such a facility, lest, he will be losing the seat which he has already secured. 3. Therefore I dispose of the writ petition with the direction that on the petitioner producing attested copies of all the certificates along with the undertaking to W.P.(C) No. 24172 OF 2011 :3 : produce the originals within one month, if the petitioner is otherwise eligible, the 3rd respondent will admit the petitioner. It is clarified that in the event the petitioner does not comply with any of the conditions for admission, the seat granted to the petitioner is liable to be withdrawn. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- Handover.