Between: HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION NO: 5083 0F 1995 ... Petitione rs/petn rs Khaja Khaleemullah dief per LRs- 1. Khaja sadullah, s/o. Khaja Khareemuilah, H.No. 8-2-67714/3, Banjarahiils, Hyderabad. 2. Jammelunnisa Begum, Wo. Ir,4ir lMuneeruddin Alikhan, H.No. g-2-67612/8, Banjarahills, Hyderabad. AND 1 State of A.P., rep. by its Revenue Divisional Officer, Hydeabad, Opp: Annapurna Hotel, Nampally, Hyderabad. State of A.P., Rep. by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad. ln the special court under A.P. Land Grabbing Court Office Complex, Near Tank Bund, Hyderabad. ...Respondents/respts. Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more in the nature of writ of l\4andamus declaring the A.P. Land Grabbing (prohibition) Act, 1982 as illegal arbitrary and ultravires and u nco nstitutional and consequenfly set aside the and declare the order of the special court, A.p. Land Grabbing (prohibition) Act, Hyderabad in LGC.No.73191 dated 2SlO1l1995 as unenforceable. 2 126711 PRESENT Petition under Se( stated n the affdavt,,;:T ::1,:::nff:ffij:lJ",.,ff ::,J,il:: pleased to stay of all furth in pursua nce "r,h" " d",'::? ;'j:::::, :JJJ: j::,?:t:::Hr::H* (Prohibition) Act' Hvderabad in L.G.c.No.73rg1 , dated 25r01r1995 pending disposal of the above Writ petition. WPI\4P. NO: 6278 OF 1995 WPMP .NO:22637 0F 2013 Kha1a Sadullah Hyderabad. S/o. Khaja Khaleemullah, H.No. 8_2-677/A/3, Banjarahills. AND 1 ...Petitioner/petitioner 8-2-676/2/8, State of Andhra pradesh. R opp: Rnnapuirl u"tl, ili,,?rirl hf"::;::" Divisionar orricer, Hydeabad, ;i1t3r:lxJln,, Pradesh, Represented by irs chief secrerary, secretariat, Jl;.:,,rylx;?:[ under A.P. Land Grabbing courr office comptex, Near Tank g:fT,.?',l,1l:::irotfg[Ta *^ Mir r\.4uneeruddin Arikhan, H.No (R4 not necessary party) ... Respondents/Respondents Petition under Sec stated n the arrdavt, ":T:::,:::n:T:[:j:::J"rff ::,ffT:: preased to reopen the writ petition No. 50g3 0f 1gg5 to enabre the petitioners to prosecute the same fu rthe r. Counset for the petition". lyo.l, :I! T S PRAVEEN KUMAR counsel for the petitioner N.o..f : SRI M. V. KRISHNA RAO uounset for the Responr":l ltor, ., a i,'cb.'idil,[r."r. counsel for the Respondent No.3: -_-_--_-- 2 3 4 The Court made the following: ORDER Between: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION. No. 5O83 of 199s In view of the above, thc Writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No orcler as to costs ORDER: (per the Hon'ble Si Justice ,f.Vinod Kumar) Despite the matter being listed under the caption of Tor dismissat' none appeared for the petitioner, which indicates that the petitioner is t-rot in lglgsted in pursuing the matter any further 2 3. Consequently, shall stand closecl. miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, //TRUE COPY// EN/. P PADMANABHA REDDY "-' ibsrsraNr REGISTRAR \: -\\ SECTiON OFFICER To, GJ 1. One CC to Sri T S Praveen Kumar' Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri M V Krishna Rao' Advocate IOPUC] 3TwoCCstoGPforRevenue,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat HYderabad [OUT] 4. Two CD CoPies / HIGH COURT DATED:1 511112022 , -'< J ,.: +J s c tr-AN F. \= C L! i: : ] ORDER WP.No.5083 of 1995 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS as I I o --f- >6\\)- -\7 4 -z I ,-