THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.99 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner filed W.P.No.27318 of 2009 expressing the grievance that the respondent did not communicate the result of the election held for choosing the office bearers of the Union on 25.11.2009. The Writ Petition was disposed of on 15.12.2009 directing that the respondent shall communicate the result of the election of the petitioner within four weeks to the various District Units of the Department. This Contempt Case is filed alleging that the respondent did not comply with the said direction. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the respondent. The petitioner has enclosed a copy of the proceedings dated 05.01.2010 issued by the respondent. A detailed mention is made to O.S.No.5028 of 2009 in the Court of X Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad and the order passed in I.A.No.1099 of 2009. On the basis of those orders, the respondent opined that the election of a different body was affirmed by the Civil Court. In that view of the matter, it is not possible to recognize the election of the petitioner. In case, the petitioner feels aggrieved by the communication of the respondent, it can certainly pursue proper remedies. Hence, the Contempt Case is closed leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue the remedies vis-à-vis the proceedings dated 05.01.2010 or the order passed by the Civil Court. __________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Date.09.02.2011 Usd