1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 445/2010 (SHANKAR KANHU JADHAV VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. F.T.Mirza, Advocate, for petitioner. Mrs.T.D.Khade, AGP for Respondents CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 08, 2010. Heard. Though the challenge in writ petition is to orders passed in September 207 and November, 2007, limited grievance made by Advocate Mirza is revision filed by petitioner against those orders and pending before the State Government has not been so far decided. He points out that in Writ Petition No. 4447/2009 and connected matters, this court has on 11th November, 2009, directed the Government to decide those revisions in time bound manner. Advocate Mirza makes a statement that those revisions are also yet not decided and hence revision of the present petitioner can be easily taken up along with those 2 revisions and decide accordingly. Mrs. Khade, learned AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 states that she is not aware whether revision of petitioner is still pending or not. If it is pending, the same can be disposed of along with the connected revisions. In view of this position, the revision filed by the present petitioner vide Annexure-E with this Petition on 11.2.2008 is directed to be decided along with other similar matters expedited by this Court vide its earlier order dated 11th November, 2009. Rule accordingly. No costs. JUDGE Rvjalit.