IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 5TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 16TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 16181 of 2007(B) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ SIBI.K.J., S/O JOSEPH, AGED 38 YEARS, KADUTHANATH HOUSE, ANAKKAMPOYIL P.O., THIRUVAMPADY, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.P.P.JACOB SRI.N.T.SATHYAVAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. ANAKKAMPOYIL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGHAM, APCOS NO.D 55D, ANAKKAMPOYIL, KOZHIKODE, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. BOARD OF DIRECTOR/ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, ANAKKAMPOYIL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGHAM, APCOS NO.D 55D, ANAKKAMPOYIL, KOZHIKODE, REP. BY ITS CONVENER. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIARY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN SRI.Y.M.BALAGOPAL R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.K.PUSHPALATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.16181/2007 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY FIRST RESPONDENT DT. 31.1.94. EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY LIC TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT DT. NIL. EXT.P3:- COPY OF THE WORK ALLOTMENT ORDER ISSUED BY FIRST RESPONDENT DT. 31.7.06. TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P4:- COPY OF THE REPRESNTATION SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DT. 23.2.07. EXT.P5:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.6721/07 DT. 1.3.07. EXT.P6:- COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT DT. 20.4.07. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE tss THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W.P.(C) No. 16181 of 2007-B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dated this the 5th day of February, 2008 J U D G M E N T The complaint of the petitioner was that the demand made as per Ext.P6 is likely to be considered by the administrative committee. With the passage of time, the elected committee has come into force. In the circumstances, the learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner confines his submissions to a request that the writ petition may be closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to raise his contentions pursuant to Ext.P6 order before appropriate authority. Writ petition is accordingly closed. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge ms