MC 2042/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C. UPADHYAY Heard Ms. B. Gogoi, learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner, and Mr. C. Bar uah, learned Standing Counsel, IAAD. By making this application, the applicant has sought for restoration of the conn ected Cont. Cas(C) No.85 of 2011, which was dismissed for non-prosecution, on 27 .06.2011 due to absence of the engaged counsel of the applicant-petitioner. Learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner has explained the reasons for dismi ssal of the connected contempt petition on 27.06.2011 in paragraph 3 of the pres ent application. Learned counsel for the respondents has raised no objection to the prayer of the applicant-petitioner. Upon due consideration of the matter, accepting the reasons given in the applica tion, the prayer for restoration of the connected Cont.Cas(C) No.85 of 2011, is hereby allowed. Accordingly, the order, dated 27.06.2011 aforementioned, is hereby set aside and the connected Cont.Cas(C) No.85 of 2011, is hereby restored to file. This Misc. case shall accordingly stand disposed of.