FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2089/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4472/2008 SR.DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER, S.E.CENTRAL RAILWAYS ..VERSUS.. GENERAL SECRETARY, PARCEL PORTER SANGHATANA --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or Directions Court's or Judge's Orders. And Registrar's Orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri A.M.Gordey, Adv. for petitioner Shri A.S.Jaiswal, Advocate, for Respondent. CORAM : A.B.CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 5 th OCTOBER, 2009. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This is an application filed by the petitioner Railways for taking two documents on record, which are already filed at Page 69 & 76 of the record. This application has been opposed by Mr.Jaiswal, learned counsel for the respondent Union on the ground that these documents were never filed before the tribunal and the respondent Union cannot be put to surprise, that too at such a late stage. Having heard learned counsel for the rival parties, these documents were required to be in fact filed before the tribunal, in order to allow the tribunal to take proper view of the matter. Document No.4, dated 19.4.1995 in fact is a list of Persons and being a vital document, the same will have to be allowed to be taken on record subject to its test by cross examination. Further, another document i.e. letter dated 28th July, 1995, issued by D.R.M. is an intra-official letter and actually speaking make no difference if it is filed or not, but since it is intra- departmental communication, the same may be allowed. This civil application is, therefore, allowed. The documents are taken on record. Civil application stands disposed of. JUDGE Rvjalit