IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3722 of 2008 Pratima Kumari, daughter of Sanjeev Kumar, resident of Village Sheoganj, P.S. Madanpur, District Aurangabad………………………….………Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. District Magistrate, Aurangabad. 3. Child Development Project Officer, Madanpur Block, District Aurangabad. 4. Sharda Devi, Mukhia, Erki Kala Gram Panchayat, Block Madanpur, District Aurangabad. 5. Madan Mohan Pd. Panchayat Sevak, Erki Kala Gram Panchayat, Block Madanpur, District Aurangabad. 6. Sunita Kumari, Wife of Sri Kedar Sao, resident of Village Shivganj, P.S. Madanpur, District Aurangabad…………………..…Respondents ----------- 2 11.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is aggrieved by engagement of respondent no.6 on the ground that though she being higher in the panel was wrongly denied engagement. Admittedly petitioner has not availed alternative remedy before the Collector and the Commissioner, as provided under the guidelines. Therefore, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy before the Collector and the Commissioner in accordance with law. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)