-1- W.P. 2203 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2203 OF 2009 Taloja CETP Co-op. Society Ltd. And another ... Petitioners vs. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Anand Grover, instructed b y Mr. P.M. Palshikar, for the petitioners. Mr. P.P. Chavan, instructed by M/s. Navdeep Vora and Associates, for the respondents. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATE: AUGUST 09, 2010. P.C. The challenge in this petition is in respect of the rights of the parties flowing from the agreements dated 8th March, 1996 and 3rd April , 1999. Looking to the nature of the dispute involved, the learned counsel for the petitioners has expressed a desire to file appropriate civil suit before the competent Court to agitate the grievance raised in this petition. He, however, submitted that looking to the issue involved in the matter, if any interim application is filed in the proposed suit as well as the suit, the same are required to be decided expeditiously. It is further submitted that the subject matter is in connection with the setting up of Common Effluent Plant at Taloja and it concerns more than 800 members, who are members of the first -2- W.P. 2203 of 2009 petitioner society. The learned counsel for the respondents states that he has no objection, if hearing of such civil suit is ordered to be expedited by the learned trial Judge. Considering the dispute involved in the matter, the petitioners are permitted to file appropriate civil suit before the competent court of law. Regarding the prayers made in this petition, if any interim injunction application is preferred, the learned trial Judge before whom the matter is assigned shall dispose of the same and in any case within six months from the date of filing of such an application. If any prayer for expediting the suit is preferred, the learned trial Judge may decide the said application accordingly. This aspect is left to the discretion of the learned trial Judge. Since the cause of action has arisen in the year 2008, the point of limitation no longer survives and it is also not going to be the stand of the respondents that the suit is beyond the period of limitation, provided the suit is filed within four weeks from today. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that such suit will be filed within four weeks from today. The said statement is accepted. Petition is disposed of in view of what is stated above. Notice discharged. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. R.M. SAVANT, J.