IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.7749 of 1988 Date of decision : 10.9.2010 A.C.Luthra and others … Petitioners Versus Punjab University and others …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Ms.Justice Ritu Bahri Present: Mr.Arvind Galav, Advocate for Mr.Dinesh Kumar Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.K.S.Sandhu, Advocate for Mr.Anupam Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ritu Bahri, J. Petitioners in this writ petition were claiming benefits under Rule 4 sub clauses (ii) and (iii) of the Panjab University Calendar, Volume III, Edition 1985. They were claiming promotion vis-à-vis Personal Assistants in the ratio of 4:1 for the posts of Assistant Registrars. The writ petition is pending since the year 1989. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that all the petitioners have retired during the pendency of the writ petition. Nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. (Ritu Bahri) Judge 10.09.2010 sd