-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.5363 OF 2004 NO.5363 OF 2004 NO.5363 OF 2004 Suresh R. Kulkarni and ors. ... Petitioners v/s Pandurang D. Kulkarni ... Respondents Ms Lina Patil i/b Mr P.M. Pradhan for Petitioners. Mr N.V. Gangal for Respondents. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 29TH JUNE 2005. -2- P.C. :- 1. By this petition, the petitioners challenge concurrent order made by both the Courts below holding that the plaintiff is entitled for temporary injunction. Both the Courts below, on the basis of the documents on record, mainly deed of partition and the affidavits of persons, have come to the prima facie conclusion that the plaintiff is in possession of the property. I have heard learned counsel for the plaintiff. I do not find any patent error of law in the order impugned. Petition is rejected. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Personal Secretary of this Court as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. --------------------