1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO. 2225 OF 2009 Shri Pankaj Vitthal Tate .. Applicant Vs State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Ms.Preeti B Walimbe for Mr Bhushan Walimbe, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. S.D.Shinde, APP, for the Respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 08/07/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No. 59 of 2009 of Islampur Police Station. The said crime has been registered against the applicant and four others for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under section 392 read with 34 of IPC. I perused the FIR. It appears that the incident occurred on 12.3.2009, while the FIR was lodged after one month on 13.4.2009. After having considered the nature of allegations against the T 2 present applicant and that the chargesheet has already been filed and that the applicant is hardly 18 years old boy having no criminal antecedents, I am inclined to enlarge him on bail. The applicant is directed to be enlarged on bail in the sum of Rs.5,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount, subject to the condition that the applicant shall report to the concerned police station on every alternate Saturday between 6 and 7 pm for a period of six months from today. While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. Application is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)