IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No.1322 M of 2010 Date of decision: 05.03.2010 Nishan Singh ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent (s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Jasdeep Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is not even named in the FIR. Subsequently, the co-accused of the petitioner during interrogation made a disclosure that the opium in question was to be delivered to the present petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 06.11.2009. Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab on instructions from ASI Sahib Singh states that on raiding the premises of the petitioner, no recovery of opium was effected from him. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM, Patiala. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge March 05, 2010 mohan