liNtai RFNfil Ufc-i IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P.tSlNo. f^9l QF2011. PETITIONERS <^.. ^•^.'y/r A^-^^y ^ •'yA^' j>/ i?~ ^-y .'^^ F^y /'2' '' .^\v11'' ••' .^ :1. Ram Pyare Sahu, S/o. Shri Ramadhar Sahu, aged about 61 years, Head Master, Govt. Primary School Ganiyari, Block Tilda, District Raipuir (C. G.), Kritnath Sahu, S/o. Shri Jeewarakhan Sahu, aged about 59 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Ghiwara, Block Tilda, District Raipur (C. G.) 3. Lakhan Lal Sahu, S/o. Shri Shambhu Ram Sahu, aged about 58 years, Govt. Girls Middle School Kharora, Block TUda, District Raipur (C. G.) 4. Chinta Ram Verma, S/o. Shri Ram Charan Verma, aged about 59 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Moora, Block Tilda, District Raipur (C. G.) ^ ^ t '— fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B: Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra Writ Petition (S) No. 1991/2Q11 PETITIONERS : Ram Pyare Sahuand ofliers Versus RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh and others Appearance: Shri Somkant Venna, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govemment Advocate for the State/respondents. WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmJTION OF INDIA ORAL ORDER (15.04.2011) The petitioners were initially appointed as Deputy Teacher on a fixed pay ofRs.100/-. After completion ofprobation period, they were granted regular pay seale. (2) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the ease is as to whether, the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or after completion ofprobation period. (3) The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Mddhukant Yadu and56 others Vs. State ofM.P. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitied to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. '6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme 2.- ^ Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to tfae effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entided to regular pay scale fi-om date ofinitial appointment. (4) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners also submits that this court, while considering the same issue in Amar Scd Ram & others Vs. State ofChhattisgaHt <fe others [W.P. (S) No. 4725/2006] by order dated 01.09.2006, allowed the petitioaers to make a representation along with copy ofthe petition-and annexures within a period of ten days, raising all their grievances and in tum the concemed respondent was directed to decide the representation in an objective manner within a period 30 days from the date ofreceipt of the representation. (5) Accordiagly, the petitioners are granted liberty to make a representation raising all their grievances and in tum, the concemed respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date ofreceipt ofthe representation. (6) In view ofthe foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- PrashantKumarMishra Judge ^'.^>-