IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 636 OF 2010 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 30 OF 2010 MRS. MARIA SILVIA PINHO DE SOUZA ... Applicant Versus SHRI. MARIO CORNELIO FRANCISCO DE SOUZA; AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. T. D'Costa, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. J. E. Coelho Pereira, Senior Advocate with Mr. S. Karpe, Advocate for respondent no.3. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 18th February, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. D'Costa, learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr. Coelho Pereira, learned Senior Counsel for respondent no.3. 2. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 477 days in filing Appeal from Order against the order dated 18th October, 2008 passed by the trial Court in Inventory Proceedings. Although the application for condonation of delay is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the grounds stated in the application are grounds germane under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. 3. Perusal of the record discloses that the applicant has been prosecuting wrong proceedings against the impugned order. However, the same appears to have been done upon the advice of the Advocates for the applicant. Therefore, in my considered opinion, interest of justice demands that delay should be condoned. Respondent no.3 can be very well compensated by imposing the costs against the applicant. 4. In view of the above, delay of 477 days in filing Appeal from Order against the order dated 18th October, 2008 is condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs.2,500/- in favour of respondent no.3. 5. Mr. Coelho Pereira, learned Counsel for respondent no.3 states that the costs be deposited in favour of the Goa State Legal Services Authority, Panaji. Hence, the applicant to deposit costs within two weeks in favour of the Goa State Legal Services Authority, Panaji. The application stands disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA