IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.89 of 2011 NEYAZ AHMAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. ----------- 2 06.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner prays for quashing of the order dated 21.10.2010 passed in Criminal Control Case No. 112 of 2010 by the respondent no.4, the District Magistrate, Gopalganj, whereby the petitioner has been directed to remove himself outside the District of Gopalganj between the period 25.10.2010 to 30.10.2010 vide Annexure-4. It is submitted that the aforesaid order was passed in view of the Bihar Assembly Election, 2010. Learned counsel submits that the order contained in Annexure-4 is absolutely illegal for the very reason that the petitioner is not an ante-social element. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, supports the aforesaid order, however, he submits that since the period for which the petitioner was directed to remain outside the State has elapsed, the order does not subsists now and as such this writ application has become infructuous. In view of the above, the writ application is dismissed as infructuous. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)