IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37047 of 2010 RANJAY KUMAR @ RANJAY SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04/ 13.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case no. 32/2003 registered under section 302 of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act. Petitioner is named in the first information report with allegation that on the alleged date of occurrence, he went at the house of the deceased and left the house with the deceased as well as one Munna Sharma. Subsequently, murder of the deceased took place. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the statement of above stated Munna Sharma was recorded by the police but he has not stated this fact that the deceased had left his house in the company of this petitioner. Moreover, in course of investigation one so-called eye witness namely Mukesh Sharma, claimed to have seen the occurrence and he stated that deceased was killed by some other persons including one Anil Kumar. Except the above stated so-called eye witness, none of the person had come forward to claim himself as eye witness of the alleged occurrence. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, petitioner Ranjay Kumar @ Ranjay Sharma is directed to be released on bail in connection with Belaganj - 2 - P.S. Case no. 32/ 2003 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)