IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.1769-M of 2010 Date of Decision:16.3.2010 Smt. Balwinder Kaur .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab. .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. J.B.S. Gill, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. The petitioner is stated to have inflicted brick injury at the back of the head of the deceased whereas from the FIR, another co-accused also gave datar blow on the head of the deceased hitting behind the right ear. However, there is only one injury on the head. The said injury is described as injury No.3. The entire family of the petitioner has been enroped in. The husband of the petitioner namely Makhan Singh has also been arrested and the petitioner is one of the lady members of the family. She is in custody since 7.5.2009. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hoshiarpur. 16.3.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE