IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15406 of 2004 Between: K. Siva Kumar & another. … Petitioners AND The District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District & another. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Smt. S.V. Bhuvaneshwari Counsel for the respondents: GP for Revenue This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15406 of 2004 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus to set aside notice in ROC.No.A/232/03 dated Nil-07-2004 of respondent No.2, wherein the petitioners were called upon to show cause why the land assigned to them shall not be resumed after cancelling pattas as the same is required for public purpose. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that the writ petition filed questioning the show cause notice cannot be entertained because the petitioners are given an opportunity of submitting their explanation and if they are eventually aggrieved by the adverse orders, if any, passed by respondent No.2, they shall always be at liberty to question the same. The writ petition is therefore disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to submit their explanations within three weeks from today. On receipt of the explanations, if any, respondent No.2 shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders. Till then, the petitioners shall not be dispossessed from the lands in question. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.19984 of 2004 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 14.07.2008 ES