IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 12406 of 2007 Date of Decision: 07.09.2011 Prem Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present : Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. **** SURYA KANT, J.(Oral) The petitioner retired as a Peon w.e.f. 30.04.2006. His bonafide impression regarding wrong fixation of his pension and non- payment of 'interest' on the delayed payments has led to initiation of this 2nd round of litigation. The respondents have filed their reply/affidavit clarifying that the pension of the petitioner has been correctly fixed @ ` 4134/- per month. They have further stated that a sum of ` 6774/- towards interest on the delayed payment of 'gratuity' has also been sent but the petitioner did not receive the same. CWP No. 12406 of 2007 [2] In view of the fact that due payments have already been made within a reasonable period, the respondents are directed to disburse the above mentioned amount of interest upto date, to the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. As the petitioner was a class-IV employee and was not well conversant with the provisions regarding fixation of pension etc. the respondents are directed to re-examine the same so that no injustice is done to the petitioner. The needful shall be done within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 07.09.2011 (SURYA KANT) 'ravinder' JUDGE