(-/'r-cr^ LN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (Cl N0^7^^/2006 PETITIONER 6^ ^ -\y •* w/ ,fc^T/ y ^ . . f\y Rajesh Rathi S/o. Shri Govind Lal Ji Rathi Age about 39 years, Proprietor: Rathi Associates, Civil Contractors, 20, Lakhe School Complex, Gandhi Chowk, Opp. Rang Mandir, Raipur (C.G.) RESPOlQ^T Versus /1. '^^^l^ 2. Union of India Through: Director General (Works), Central Public Works Department, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi. The Executive Engineer, O/o. the Executive Engineer, Raipur Central Division, Central Public Works Department, C-D Block, 3fd floor, Room No. 304-305, Central Excise and Customs Office Building, Tikrapara, Raipur (C.G.) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 /2^'OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -^ 'lo^ XI-HC-22 3^ -^WIcl^, OTflti'is, Iqciwy <45l<h 111CTI Shlltft sn^r .U;£^i..4^/2o,^ R<>«d""""""""" 3t1^TW R-fi°k3I1^T ?h*<i'=i> ^ifer ?h*)l'=l> 3n^?T CTareTflfer <+wlfi41-< imiiT¥tet^<Ri^i< °|73)1^T:31I^T '9T 16.01.2007 Shri Siuaesh Bajaj, coiins^ Shri S.K.Beriwal, Counsel Leained counsel for the refc enunciated by the Honble Ap(ax 1 for die petitioner. Ebr respoudents No. 1 & 2. ipondents fraiLkly concedes that "the law Court in Neu> Horvtorss Lintited Sa Others repoi-ted ui (1993)1 Suprenw Ceurt Cases 478 squarely covei acquires experience as a nienibe so acquu-ed, for his individu.al pi the iiistaiit case wbereby a person who ^ of airy partiiership finn, his experience jrticipation caiinot be ig-tiored. Execunve Engineer, Raipu^' Departineat, Raipui' vide ineiao dated 18.11.2006 refused to ac<| hiui while workiiig as active p| feelitig aggiieved flie iastaiit peti.1 ^- Centt-al Division, Cenn-al Public Works No. 54 (47)/RCD/06-07/1257 Raipur, 'ept credential of petitioner acquired bv jartiier of M/s. •Siagliailia Entei-ilrises. jion for foUowitig substaiitial islief ; That the impugni Anuexure -P/9 , ps be set aside ia tl Respoiideiits be credentials subini peiiuit him to proceediiigs. |:d orier dated 18.11.2006, (.ssed by ftie Respondent No.2, [e interest of justice aiid the directed to consider ttie jtted by the petitioner aild take jiart ia the teader (ift^^PT) XI-HC-22 3^ •^l41cl<<, ©xflwis,ficiiuy qsltfi *iT*«'na>iit»> OT^?T ..y;.6..c^).^.^y2oo6 RM""""""""""" 3t1^T%T f^ITOSTI^TT stiira gf?tT a>nw afi^i^wwflfer -2-. Adiaittedly petitioner w] Entei-prises doing busin.ess of were not considered by the resp Hon'ble fhe Apex Coiul y Unioii of India Sa Others, (Si as below ; the partners ef the °bi'!if<'i41-< <<Wc<TffiWl'<Ri«i< ^sri^irsii^T is active pai-tiier of M/'s. Singha.ilia ;ivil contract but petitiouer's credentials >naents. pra) at Page No.492 ia Pai-a 23 observed e earlier escperience of one of "^ *ri -'('^^ ). \^" XI-HC-22 sn^r^r R-li'kSD^T t. aifw NlHfB? c. 6\\ z 3^ •<<l<<lcl<<, siTfld'ls, Rcfiyy 3T1^T qa^ W<dl Sff*nq>^...^(i?.4Q...^/200?S fe^s""""""""" iee tn u ^h^rf^ 5*ir w in its naine lacks. skrsons with extierien.ee. The und iyitsre the offer o| 'sy Havuig Gonsidered Uie lati adniission of learued counsel f4r an.fi circiiiD.staiices of flie eaj substantial reUef as m.entioned petition is disposed of. 1...^.^^.^^^^^ Sd/- V.K-Shrivastava Judge ^ ^^ /)^)'* ^^ •=i>i<it<'i<fli iwci'i"ffte(^l'<Rit<i< ^srf^ifgt^r rioi ni inay be a. split in. a ter a has experieiice in its neune w •w laid down by Hon"ole the Apex Coiu-t the respondent as weB. as all the facts >e fhe petitioner's pi-ayer for graiit of ibove is allowed and accordhiglv the writ Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge (^y^) B