^Sing!& Beach \CTa\ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, CHHATTISTGARH at BILASPUR. WRIT PETITIONfS) N0.^6fo / 2006. \ PETITIONER \J^ ..••» ^ov/<^ y.-- ^... '.^••15 ^•""...•••""- ..••••"CbK^..-•'"' ...-•"" :^^'.--"" ^>""^"1 —9>^"""' ^^ ^6°-'' ^^•••' RESPONDENTS Praveen Kumar Barwe ^ . S/o Shri. Sahadeo Barwe Aged around 29 years, Unemployed. Residing at: Qr. No.21/B Street-MPR Road, Sector No. 1 1 Khursipar, Zone-I, BBHLAI - 490001 Tehsil and Dist.: Durg (CG). VERSUS 1. 2. The Managing Director (S^B^, Bhilai Steel Plant, ^ Ispat Bhawan, BfflLAl - 490001 District: Durg(CG). The Deputy Manager, (Personnel-Recruitment) Bhilai Steel Plant, BfflLAI-490001 District: Durg CCG) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER AND DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY. MANDAMUS ETC. XI-HC-78 3^ •<ll^lcl<l, 8'Tfly'IS, («l<11+fy D »Wv\\*<-li* •<<^-t^y--^-'»'••.•^ 200 € 3il^l yafi (yft^qqiT)- 3n^TERrR-fi+ traT3TI^Tsbli<ti ?T<tTW;ETt?a'3n^T =hi*<T<n'41'i HP^ff' ^' tecet <[^i^<,i< ^srf^iTsn^r ../ <-• Ss'oma 30.S-2006 Heard Mr. B.P. Rao, counsel|forthe petitioner. By the instant writ petition uifider Artfcle 226/227 of the Constltution of India, the petitioner tias prayed that the r^spondents be directed to consider the case of the petitioner for compassionate afjipointment on aocount of the retirement of the petitioner's father on medical groun^ The case of the petitioner i^ Chargeman-cum-Master Operator for the job by the Medical Board of ^ father was dischaiged from service| that the father of the petitioner was employed in S-10 Grade and posted in Heating & Regulation Section of CO & CCD qepartment of Bhitai Steei Plant. Subeequently, on medical ground the father of the ||)etitionerwas declared Permanent Medioal Unfit hilai Steel Plant. Based on that, the petitioner's vide order dated 31-8-1998 and on that basis, the petitioner submitted a represeititation for eompassionate appointment. Even after the tapse of 6-7 years, the re^porrients have not considered the case of the petitioner for compassionate appoinl|ment. Learned counsel for the peti|ttoner submitted that on simllar ground number of pereons have been appointed on jsompassionate appointment, whereas, the case of the petitioner is not being oonsid^red. Therefore, the respondents be directed to consider the representation of the matter. Having heard leamed coun^el for the petitioner and having perused the petition and the documents, the pr^yer made by learned counsel is Just, fair and reasonable. Therefore, respondent the apptication considering the appointment, in accordancewith the With the direction aforesaid, I Parties are entitled for certifi^d copy of this order. petitioner and pass appropriate order in the No.2 is directed to scrutintze the representation submitted by the petitioner for comitassionate appoirtment and pass finat order on |case bf the petitioner for compassionate poltey of respondent No.1. ihe petition stands disposed of. SdJ- 1..G.1 '^.