^'p f o-s> IN THK HIGH GOtJRTly OF ©HNAmSCrARHAT BIKASPUR Writ Petition N0. %49-S~ /2005 PETITIONER ^ ,^a^ .^n^^ 'f>?^y w -**' '^i"'} f)^y ^^ '^y ^' RESPONDENTS :1. /^.. .;<¥t'-.'',."a ^p^" l/ol ^^. c^c' •^ V &• r,.'s® ^^r.^:^. ^ ^^%fe^ 'ISl€t05 -rHAKURVUAYSlNGH Asst-SoiT^"?oi'"ar"''{tndia., 'CHHWri3GA WGIJ[ ^ HigtiCourtCampus,Bttaspun''ji 3. 5. 6. Ashok Kumar Soni Aged about 39 years S/p. Late Tularam Sbrii R/o. Village Silyari, Bloek- Dha.rsiva, District Raipur (C.G.}: ! :. ;, : •; • VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh : Through SeGretary De-partTnent of Education Man&aj.ay'D.K; S. BhaSvan Raipwfe^G.) Distrlct Educatibn Offieer Raipur (C.&.) Block Education Officer Gha.rsiva, Raipur (C.G.) The Princlpal Govt. Higher Secondary School Stlyari, District Raipur (C.G.) State of M.P. Through Secretary, • Departinent df Educatioh, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) Union of India TlU-QTigK Secrefary Departnien.t pf Public Cnrievajices Thtrd I;'lQor, Lo,k Nayak Bliawan, Kh.aii Markef New Dellii (2) WRIT PEyriTIONU/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA m XI-HC-22 sn^w^r ft'ii'hsn^ir shfroBfer ^ 3R? •^[ww, wiSww, Kwvy. ^.^^.^2^ ^ 200^ II*<CTI sn*)it»> (^•b<d sn^r WOIW flfer 7-7-2006 Mr. D.N. Prajapati, counsel Mr. A.S. Kachhawaha, Soyt. f|?r the petitioner. |idvocate for the State/respondents No.l to 4. Mr. S.K. Ben'wa!, Central No.6. Heard. By this writ petition, the respondents to consider the ca^e appointment. The case of the petitioner ij as Assistant Teacher in ©oyt.Prinxtr harness on 24-1-2000 while in .Annexure P-1 on 14-2-2000 for forworded a letter dated 4-8-; appointment to the petitioner. Officer, Raipur, sent a Istter to rs\ of the petitioner for compassionat^ documents and the Distr'ict Educatifcn petitioner to respondent No.l on 9-| The State 6overnment hasl appointment will be considered on| formation of the 5tate i.e. 1-11-2000 g^vt. Counsel for Union of India/respondent *i<if<'i<l1-< Hit«iT¥fei</l<Ri*tfi< ^FSgf^irsn^T serMce coiln -20(110 petitioner has prayed for directing the ^eof the petitioner for compassionote that father of the petitioner was working jiry School, Kuthrel, Dharsiwa and he died in s. The petitioner submitted application ipassionats appoinfment. Respondent No.4 to respondent No.2 •forcompassionate |0n 3rd Au9ust, 2001, Ci^trict Education ^pondent No.l for consideration of the case oppointment. The petitioner submitted all Officer forwarded the application of the ^0-2001. sto+ed +hat cpplication for compcssionate ^ in case where the employees died cfl-er and now the State ©overnmenthas taken C<»^^) XI-HC-22 3^''<<l<llcl<l, ®Tn+|'IS,RlcfUyi IIHCfTSniiqi 3ll^l "^sich _.^,^^7^/ w""""'""''"' ^ 200 5~ f^<)«d STI^TqiT fiaNisn^r StllW WH)^(T aii^ifi gwiwnfer a decision that deoendants of thos< are being considered for" compassioi Therefore, in view of the dirscted to consider the case of thi in accordance with the 6overnmenl months from the date of receipt of With ths direction aforesaid] Consequentiy, I.A.No.5691/2p05 Partles ore entitled for certi <tii<ifci<(1-< *fi*i<iTftfe<^<|5it<ii< ^qri^ran^T employees who died on or after 1-11-1997 |ate appointment. (Sovernment decision, respondent No.l is petitioner for compassionate appointment policy and decida the same within three ja copy of this order. the petition stands disposed of. also stands disposed of. ied copy of this order. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge (^y^) <.'