In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Revision No. 1118 of 2004 (O&M) Date of decision: May 01, 2009 Jaswant Singh .. Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Praduman Yadav, DAG, Haryana. A.N. Jindal, J Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pehowa, vide its judgment dated 1.2.2000, convicted and sentenced the accused-petitioner (herein referred as 'the petitioner') to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months and to pay fine of Rs.250/-, for violation of provisions of Rule 32 sub clause © and Rule 42 (zzz) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1955. On appeal, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Tract Court, Kurukshetra, dismissed the appeal with the modification in the sentence to reduced to simple imprisonment for one month without alteration in the sentence of fine. The judgment of conviction has not been assailed and only leniency was sought to be taken. The offence in this case took place in the year 1991. The petitioner is said to be 85 years of age at the time of commission of the offence and now he must be more than 100 years of age. He has further informed me that the petitioner has undergone 25 days of the substantive sentence. Under these circumstances, this revision petition is dismissed with the modification in the sentence to that of already undergone by him without alteration in the sentence of fine. Bail bond and surety bond furnished by him stand discharged. May 01, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge