FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.2168 OF 2007 -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Mr.M.L.Patil i/b Mr.M.L.More for the petitioners. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 12TH FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED: 12TH FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED: 12TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The petitioners have taken exception to an order dated 2nd February, 2006 by which their application at Exhibit-318 has been rejected for the reasons stated in the said order. I perused the application at Exhibit-318 so also other relevant documents placed on record with the assistance of learned counsel for the petitioners. In my opinion, the impugned order cannot be faulted and warrants no interference in writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In my opinion, dismissal of the writ petition shall not preclude the petitioners from making an application for their impleadment in Darkhast No.30 of 1990 so also for clubbing said Darkhast with Darkhast No.55 of 2003 filed by the petitioners. If such an application is filed same may be considered on merits in accordance with law. It is needless to express that the court below shall consider the application, if filed, by the petitioner as indicated above uninfluenced by the observations made in the impugned order. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)