IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No.11148 of 2011 Date of Decision:30.8.2011 Yogender Sharma .... Petitioner Versus Food Corporation of India and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Kamal Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.K. Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to proceed with the enquiry pertaining to Memorandum dated 22.10.2010 (P-2) till conclusion of criminal trial. Learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record the copy of letter dated 21.6.2011 received from the enquiry officer submitting therein that the regular hearing in the case has been postponed due to administrative reasons till further orders. Learned counsel for the respondents has also stated at the bar that the department shall not proceed with the enquiry till the evidence is complete before the trial Court. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, the present petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. 30.8.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE