IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Delay Condonation Application No.337 of 2008 In Criminal Revision No.88 of 2008 Vipin Kumar Nagaliya … Revisionist Versus State of Uttarakhand & three others … Respondents Dated: May 20, 2008 Sri Ashok Aggarwqal, learned counsel for the applicant/revisionist Sri Harish Pujari, learned Adll. G.A. for the State HON. DHARAM VEER, J. This criminal revision, preferred by the revisionist under Section 397/401 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as Cr.P.C.), is directed against the judgment and order dated 03.09.2001 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/FTC-I, Dehradun in S.T. No.189 of 1995, State vs. Brijesh & others. Sri Ashok Aggarwal, learned counsel for the revisionist stated at bar that he does not want to press his delay condonation application and the present revision and he may be permitted to withdraw the delay condonation application as well as the present revision. He further submitted that he may also be permitted to avail the appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum. In view of the above-said statement, the delay condonation application as well as the present criminal revision preferred by the revisionist, both are dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to the revisionist to seek appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum. (Dharam Veer, J.) Rajeev Dang