1 cp576,577.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 576 OF 2010 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.577 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. Rajeev K. Pandey i/by PRS Legal for the Petitioner. --- CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATE : 16th DECEMBER 2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner. The breach alleged is of clause No.9 of order dated 22nd October, 2010 passed by this Court. 2. The grievance made in the petition is that notwithstanding the aforesaid order, the Court Bailiff alongwith the Police officers and a 2 cp576,577.10 representative of the respondent visited the suit premises and started taking measurements for the purpose of execution. In paragraph 18 of the petitions it is stated that after the officer of the petitioner pointed our the order of the stay passed by this Court, no further steps were taken by the Court Bailiff. There is no specific averment that the decree was executed by the Court Bailiff. 3. In the circumstances, this is not a fit case where action can be initiated under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Petitions are disposed of. JUDGE