IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45683 of 2009 SUNIL PANDEY, Son of Late Janki Pandey, resident of village Dhangai, P.S. Dhangai, District Bhojpur ……. Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ……… Opposite Party ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Prabhakr Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Pd. Singh, A.P.P. 4 18.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 366(A) and 372 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner had been falsely implicated and there is variation in the statement made in the first information report and the statement of victim girl recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. Petitioner is stated to be in custody since 12.7.2009. Learned counsel for the State submitted that the victim girl is the first information herself and she has given graphic account how she was abducted by the petitioner along with other co-accused persons and was kept under confinement. In the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. the girl has also 2 alleged that she has been raped by the petitioner. Having regards to the facts and circumstances and gravity of nature of the allegation made by the victim girl herself who is informant, this Court would not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. As a result this application is dismissed at this stage. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)