INTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATCHHATTtSGARH: BItASPUR » \ CP.M.e.No. PETmONERS/APPLICANT 0€ 72006 1. Sint. Hemalata Chandrakar, W/o Shri Lalji Chandrakar, aged about35 years, ,J)2. Praveen Kumar,S/oLalji Chandrakar, aged about 12 ..^ »c t^--"r .ff t^ed sp""^>'. 's1-'*" .. ^'"T^? years, both arc R/oVillage- ^c^> •••- ^^ -^\^<| '" ;.;; . . _ : ., ,.••••"'" ~^v"y,it.kM Randariya,Road,^Nearwater —•"" ^ ! ~ y^isfiv'" ';';-:":—'.;'^.:: :-. .-: tank,^i.ingeli, P.S. Miingell, • "'Districst. Bilaspul-^ C.G.^s.^S'^ ^.:": ^^ : ^tia^^-;^ •:^^t^'^c^ct^^ ' VERSUS' '*^:''11^ \^<^c''i^^^^t'^^^^ RESPONDENT/ NON-APPLICANT Lalji ehandrakar S/o ^ ' " S.L.ehandrakar,aged39.;' years; oecupation- cierk, R/o - Nagar PancliayatpPandariya, - TahsII-;Panclaiiya;DiSti-ict- Kawai-dha,CG. CRIMINALREVISION UNDERSECTION-4g2 OFTHE CODE CRIMINXLPRGCEDURE. 1/^3/<% .1 .1 • 1 1 XI-HC-78 *<1*1WI Sh<fl^» 3^'^mRra', »-rfl*i'i6,IsKnwy \:.^.r.:.£ylp^ H^ 200 3n^TwR-4i+ cT^TT an^T st)4-| ic^ 3TT^?r<4acn (yi(^q<,iiT) 5TTOKgf?(T3n^T 14.12.2006 Shri O.P. Yadav: Coun! Heard on. adinissioiL Bv wav of ttus petition Crimiaal Procedure, fhe validity and nroririety of ti|ie order dated 8/5/2006 passed m Crimiaal Revision No.157/ (FTQ. MimeeU.-Distnct - Bflfcspur (C.G.), bv which, a Revision filed afiainst the order dated EO-06-2005 passed bv the Judicial Maeisteate First Class. MutieeU in MisceBaueous CruDinal Case No.57/2004 for alteration d fhe Code of Criminal Pro inonthly maintenance on titie eround that now the i Class-I in the year 1999^is| exoenses are reautred for y the salary ofthe respondenf <tii<<Ici41.i *<it<c]T ff te<A<Ri«i< ^sri^R'sn^T ,el for the apolicants. ffled under Section 482 of the Code of olicants have chaUeneed fhe leeality, 005 bv II Additional Sessions Judee f the ajnount of Biaintenaace under Section 127 offhe Code ofCtimiDal Procedure has been disratesed. The brief facts are thajt ia a proceediae under Section 125 of •edure filed throueh Cruninal Case No.88/98, fhe Judicial Maalistrate First Class, Munaeli gianted a suin ofRs.1000/- and Rs.5QO/- to the ariroUcants as fhe ainount of '31/1/1999 under Section 125 of the Code of Crimiual Procedukc. It appears that thereafter, fhe appUcauts ffled aa appUcatton under Section 127 of the Code of Cruninal Proceduic for enlibiiceinent of fhe aforesaid amount on. etitioner No.2. who was studvin.e in studvine in Cass VII and some more Is studies and there has been rise in orices also in the lone iateih/al of 5 years aud durmig this period, has also uicreased froin Rs.4000/- to Rs.7000/-, fherefore. the auiount ofmonfhlv maiiitenance may be ^——^^ '' i 1. XI-HC-78 an^T^rf^R) craTST^Tshi-jich c^^f ^'.^ '^;/<^' •'A' tll+l^fTShHlcb 3^'^ipn?Fr, ®Tnw'i6,l«fdiy^< **»•***•»****»•*»*» */• 200 • OT^T "ra^ (1^3^Er) ?RITW flf?cT SII^T ZJ ly maaiteiji^.n. enhaaced to Rs.3000/- petition.er No.2. The leamed tri.al disinissed the aforesaid amount of inonthlv asainst the aforesaid order the revision on ttie erounft uetitioner No. 1 was holdinrt doiae aericultural work ia| additioa to the amount of| Mauv ofher grounds were coTifinnation ofthe order I have sone fhrouetl Revisional Court filed After eoine through counsel for the applicant, I ^a weU as Revisional Gourt hs|s which mav warraat interfer^ni the Code of Crimiual This netition ffled Procedure has no inerit andl However. fhis order w|iU to file anv subseauent action at a later staee. t^ petitioner No.l aad Rs.2000/- to ludee after con.ductuia fhe enquiry Ipplication ffled for alteration of the palssed aloncptFith interfertnce Proce^ure. undler »hi<<t<'i<(l-f *<i*«iTffte(3'<Ri+<ii< ^srf^Tsn^r iji^.nce. Thereafter, a revision was ffled dcnd fhe Revisional Court also dismissed that it com.es in fhe evidence that 1.78 acres of irriffated laad aad was the sald land aud this was in mauitenaace eranted in their favour. yso taken by the Revisional Court for bv fhe tnal Court. the mipugned order passed by the tbis petition. the order aad after heanaa leamed ton of the ooinion that the tri.al Court as not coiiunitted aay such irreeularity, bv this Court under Section 482 of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal the same is disinissed. not come in fhe way of fhe appUcantS on anv subsequent cause of aptiUcation Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge P.T.O. ^