IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37932 of 2010 BIRCHHA MANJHI, SON OF LATE LANGAR @ LAGARH MANJHI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 08.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 447, 323, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 10.5.2010 vide Cr. Misc. 14728 of 2010 stating therein that it has been rejected at this stage. It has been submitted that now charge has been framed and the petitioner is in custody since 15.2.2010. In case charges have been framed against the petitioner he would be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of A.D.J. IIIrd, Jamui, in Sessions Trial No. 101 of 2010 arising out of Barhat (Malaypur) P.S. Case No. 27 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other 2 case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)