IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10060 of 2010 YOGENDRA SINGH @ YOGENDRA PRASAD SINGH, S/o Kapildeo Singh. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 31.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 302, 307 and 324/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not the assailant of the deceased and he is said to be merely an order giver. It has been submitted that final report had been submitted against the petitioner and thereafter cognizance was taken disagreeing with the same. In the meanwhile the co-accused were put on trial and they were convicted for the offences under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code only. In view of such and also that the petitioner is a government servant, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Naya Ram 2 Nagar P.S. Case No. 184 of 2004 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)