1 Ash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 282 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4864 OF 2003 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri Girish Pariyani for the Applicant. Ms Shama Mulla i/by Tejash Dande for the Respondent. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 9TH APRIL, 2010 P.C.: . The respondent in the Writ Petition has preferred this Civil Application for injunction restraining the Petitioner in the Writ Petitioner from disposing of the property bearing Plot No.5, Survey No.128/2 situate at Kothrud, Pune, and in the alternative for appointment of a Court Receiver. The record shows that the said applicant (Respondent in the Writ Petition ) had filed the Civil Application No.2315 of 2004 praying for attachment of the same property. In the present Civil Application, now it is sought to be contended that an attempt has 2 been made by the Petitioner in the Writ Petition to create third party interests. The earlier application being Civil Application No.2315 of 2004 was rejected as misconceived on the ground that there is no averment to the effect that the Respondent ( Petitioner in the Writ Petition ) was likely to dispose of the property. 2. While filing the present Civil Application, the fact of filing the earlier Civil Application has not been disclosed. Therefore, no case is made out for grant of equitable relief. There is a bald assertion made in the Civil Application alleging that the Petitioner in the Writ Petition is likely to create a third party interest. 3. The Civil Application is rejected. (A.S.OKA, J)