IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9161 of 2010 Ramu Mandal @ Ramanand Mandal, son of Fedru Mandal, Resident of Villqage-Dhamna-Dithora, P.S. Sikty, District- Araria. ………………………………………….Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar …………………………Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 15. 03. 2010. Heard the parties. The petitioner is an accused in a case instituted under Section 457/380 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that even in the F.I.R. merely suspicion has been raised against the petitioner that he might have stolen two she- buffalos. It is also submitted that stolen she buffaloes have not been recovered from the custody of the petitioner and one Laxman Sharma produced the aforesaid stolen buffalos before the Police. It is further submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 13. 12. 2009. Learned counsel for the State has pointed out that petitioner is an accused in other criminal case also. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, namely, Ramu Mandal @ Ramanand Mandal is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in connection with Sikty Police Station Case No. 80 of 2009, subject to conditions (a) that one of the bailors must be Govt. Servant or close family members 2 of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner, (b) if the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the informant/prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned and (c) the petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fails to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. m.p. (Birendra Prasad Verma,J.)