SCA/2847220/2007 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 28472 of 2007 With SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8113 of 2007 With SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 9617 of 2007 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= APOLLO TYRES LIMITED - Petitioner(s) Versus COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR & 1 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR KIRAN C RAVAL for Petitioner(s) : 1, Mr. Krunal D. Pandya, Asstt.GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent(s) : 1, NOTICE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 1, MR MS MANSURI for Respondent(s) : 2, ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT Date : 08/09/2008 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Both the learned Counsel have requested jointly that three matters could be disposed of as there is consensus between SCA/2847220/2007 2/2 JUDGMENT the Counsel and parties with regard to final disposal of these matters. Issues raised in Special Civil Application No.28472 of 2007 can be kept open to be decided by the Tribunal, viz., with regard to wages, etc. on merits and all the grounds available to the parties would be open to be urged by both the parties. With regard to issue of appearance raised in Special Civil Application No.8113 of 2007 and Special Civil Application No.9617 of 2007, the counsels have stated at bar that they will not object to each other's appearance or their appointed advocates before Industrial Tribunal in Reference (IT) No.29/2006. 2. In view of this, Industrial Tribunal, Vadodara, is directed to proceed with Reference (IT) No.29/2006 and the same shall be heard as expeditiously as possible. 3. With these observations, the petitions are disposed of. Rule discharged. Interim stay granted stands vacated. No costs. (S. R. Brahmbhatt, J.) vijay*