IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.431 of 2009 1. Sidhe Ram. 2. Dhari Ram. Both sons of late Karu Ram, resident of village- Pathraura, P.S. Atari in the district of Gaya. ……Intervenor……Petitioners. Versus 1. Awadhesh Singh, son of late Udit Singh. 2. Balmati Devi, wife of Awadhesh Singh. 3. Nandkishore Singh. 4. Upendra Singh. 5. Gajendra Singh. 6. Dilip Singh. 7. Naveen Singh. All sons of late Vidya Singh. 8. Jaimurat Devi, wife of late Vidya Singh. All residents of village- Pathraura, P.S. Atari, in the district of Gaya. ….Plaintiff…Opp. Party. 9. Surendra Singh, son of late Alakhdeo Singh. 10. Bijay Singh. 11. Binay Singh Both sons of late Kamla Singh. All residents of village- Pathraura, P.S. Atari in the district of Gaya. …..Defendant….Opp. Party. 12. Munurika Singh, son of late Udit Singh, resident of village- Pathraura, P.S. Atari in the district of Gaya. ….Proforma defendant…Opposite party ----------- 05- 22.11.2011 Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar No.1 for the petitioners, and Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh for opposite party nos.1 to 8. This civil revision application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against the order dated 6.2.2009, passed by the learned Munsif 2nd Court, Gaya, in Title Suit No.32 of 2007, whereby their application to be impleaded as party 2 defendants in the suit has been rejected on the ground that his case is beyond the frame of the suit. 2. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties. It appears to us that the present petitioners base their claim to right, title and interest to the suit property on the ground of long-standing possession. Law is well settled that the plaintiff alone determines the frame of the suit. The case of the present petitioners seems to be beyond the frame of the suit. Thirdly, the case of the present petitioners based as it is on the basis of alleged long-standing possession, cannot get declaration in the present suit. We, therefore, agree with the impugned order. 3. This civil revision application is dismissed. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/