1 WPNo.2294.11 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2294 OF 2011 Amesh Chandar More ... Petitioner v/s The Sr. Commandant Central Industrial Securty Force & ors. ... Respondents Mr.R.L.Majgaonkar for the petitioner. Mr.Rajeev Chavan along with Karan Bhosale for respondents. CORAM: A. M. KHANWILKAR & R. Y. GANOO, JJ. DATED: 15TH JULY, 2011 P.C.: 1. Preliminary objection is raised by the counsel for the respondents about the maintainability of this petition. We are in agreement with the preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy by way of revision under Rule 54 of the Central Industrial Security Force Rules. In the circumstances, we decline to exercise writ jurisdiction and instead give liberty to the petitioner to exhaust the remedy of revision under Rule 54, if so advised. 2 WPNo.2294.11 All questions raised in the petition are kept open for consideration on merits, at the appropriate stage. 2. Writ petition disposed of. ( R. Y. GANOO, J. ) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.) 3 WPNo.2294.11