IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36829 of 2009 PRAMOD SINGH SON OF BAIDYANATH SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 09/12/2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that in the First Information Report itself, it is being stated that the Police had arrived at the house of the petitioner looking for his brother Ranjit Singh and then the recovery was made from the joint house, but not the conscious possession of the petitioner and even though, the petitioner had four cases pending against him, in two of them he has been acquitted or final report is being submitted and in the 2nd one another Pramod Singh is an accused and in 4th case a compromise petition has been filed between the parties, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 24.2.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Barauni P.S. Case No. 62 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall 2 also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)