IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.1825 of 2008 1. Lalan Prasad, son of late Jagnarayan Thakur 2. Fulmati Devi, wife of late Jagnarayan Thakur 3. Madan Prasad, son of late Jagnarayan Thakur 4. Dadan Kumar, son of late Jagnarayan Thakur 5. Shakuntala Devi, D/O late Jagnarayan Thakur 6. Kanchan Devi, D/O late Jagnarayan Thakur 7. Shatrughan Prasad, son of late Jagnarayan Thakur, resident of Hajiyapur, P.O. Gopalganj, P.S. Gopalganj, Ward no.8, District-Gopalganj ---- Petitioners. Versus Shiv Balak Thakur, son of late Mahadeo Thakur, resident of Hajiyapur, P.S. Gopalganj, Ward No.8, District- Gopalganj. ---- Opposite Party. ---------------------------------- 7. 11.11.2011 Heard Mr. Shambhu Sharan Singh for the petitioners. Opposite party no.1 of Misc. Case No. 18 of 2007 (Shiv Balak Thakur Vrs. Jag Narayan Thakur) has filed this civil revision application under the provisions of Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and is directed against the order dated 10.7.2008, whereby the learned Sub-Ordinate Judge Ist Court, Gopalganj, has rejected the application filed by him and has refused to recall the order dated 22.11.2007, whereby a Pleader Commissioner had been appointed. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Title Suit No. 156 of 1993 is pending before 2 the learned civil court at Gopalganj. During pendency of the suit, the learned trial court directed for appointment of a Pleader Commissioner by order dated 22.11.2007. Thereafter the petitioner herein filed an application for recall of this order on the ground that the learned trial court had made reference to the Pleader Commissioner which are beyond the suit properties. The application for recall of the order dated 22.11.2007 has been rejected. We agree with the impugned order for the reason that a Pleader Commissioner report is subject to the objection of the parties, and is subject to final orders of the court concerned. In other words, even if the learned trial court has incorporated properties beyond the suit properties in his reference to the Pleader Commissioner, it will be open to the parties to file objection to the Pleader Commissioner report in accordance with law which shall be subject to the final orders of the Court. The civil revision application is dismissed. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar, J.)