 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO: 265/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO:1994/2008 ( Aniruddha Umakant Sherkar vs. S.T. Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee and others) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. ................................................................................................................................... CORAM: D.D.SINHA & A. P. BHANGALE , JJ. DATED: 27th February, 2009. *** 1. Heard Mr R K Deshpande, learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner; Mr Tareeq M Zaheer, Adv.h/for Shri P B Patil for the Respondent No.1 and Mr Majumdar, learned AGP for State of Maharashtra. 2. Civil Application No. 265/2009 is moved by the petitioner seeking direction to the Respondent No.4-Institute as well as Respondent No.5 University to declare the result of the petitioner of B.E. First year (Computer Technology). Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Writ Petition No.1994/2008 is filed by the petitioner against the order passed by the Scrutiny Committee invalidating his caste claim as belonging to “Halbi” Scheduled Tribe. It is contended that the Scrutiny Committee primarily invalidated the tribe claim on the ground that the petitioner failed to establish affinity with the said  Scheduled Tribe. It is further contended that issue in this regard is considered by the full Bench and the matter is closed for judgment. However, the said judgment has not yet been pronounced by the Full Bench. In the circumstances, it is prayed that without prejudice to the rights of the parties, the direction as prayed for in the present Civil Application, may kindly be granted. 3. The above-referred aspects are not disputed. Similarly, since the respondents 2 and 3 considered the claim of the petitioner for grant of admission from the Scheduled Tribe category provisionally in view of the our interim order dated 20th June 2008, it will be appropriate to dispose of the present Application with direction to the Respondents 4 and 5 to declare the result of the petitioner. It is made clear that the declaration of the result shall not create any equity in favour of the petitioner and if the petition fails the petitioner shall not be entitled to claim any benefit on the basis of provisional admission a well as provisional declaration of the result of B.E. First year. 4. With the above observation and direction Civil Application is disposed of. Steno copy allowed. JUDGE JUDGE sahare