1 D.B.Civil Special Appeal(Writ) No.401/2009 Jethu Singh Kachhawaha V/s State of Raj. & ors. 23.4.2009 Hon'ble the Chief Justice Mr.Deepak Verma Hon'ble Mr.Justice Prakash Tatia Mr.M.S.Singhvi for the appellant. Mr.R.S.Saluja for the respondents no.2 to 4. Mr.Amit Mehta for Mr.M.R.Singhvi for respondent no.5. With consent arguments heard. Admittedly, appellant was not party to S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1740/08 Daulat Raj Bhandari V/s State of Rajasthan & ors. decided by learned Single Judge on 22.12.2008. According to appellant, the impugned order passed by learned Single Judge was adversely affecting his interest. Thus, he filed this appeal, after seeking leave of the court, which was granted to him on 18.3.2009. On 13.4.2009 while hearing the matter, Division Bench was pleased to direct the respondent-Municipal Corporation to recall meeting of Building Committee and to consider sanction of maps, which were earlier sanctioned by a Committee, which was headed by appellant. We have been given to understand that the said sanction has already been accorded to appellant on 20th April, 2009, which has been placed on record. It is also no more in dispute that appellant has already deposited the conversion charges. Thus, for all practical purposes, this appeal has rendered infructuous. However, learned counsel for appellant contended that on account of certain observations, having been made against the 2 appellant in the impugned order, the same are causing great hardship to him. We have been taken through the said observations made by learned Single Judge. It is also true that pursuant to the order passed by learned Single Judge, another Committee of Municipal Corporation has once again examined the sanctioned maps of the appellant and came to the conclusion that the same are in consonance with the Regulations of 2001 and required set back, which was required to be left open and parking space, was available. In other words, the maps, which were sanctioned earlier by a Committee, which was headed by appellant himself, have once again been sanctioned by another Committee and the same has been found to be in order and in accordance with law. It is also not in dispute that appellant was not given any opportunity of hearing before any alleged remarks were made against him by learned Single Judge. That being the position, if any observations made by learned Single Judge are coming in the way of appellant, the same shall be deemed to have been expunged. Thus, this appeal, for all practical purposes, has rendered infructuous. Therefore, it stands disposed of. Parties to bear their respective costs. (Prakash Tatia)J. (Deepak Verma)CJ Parmar