IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 04.10.2010 C.R.No.6437 of 2010 (O&M) Asha Rani ...Petitioner Versus Chand Rani ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. A.S.Sivia, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present revision petition is to an order passed by the learned Executing Court on 15.03.2008 and the order in appeal dated 29.05.2010, whereby the petitioner was directed to pay ` 15,000/- as compensation to the decree-holder for non-production of the articles released to the petitioner as sapurdar. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks a weeks’ time to deposit the amount, as directed by the learned Executing Court. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the orders passed by the Courts below. However, as per the request made by the petitioner, the petitioner may deposit the amount of ` 15,000/- on or before 15.10.2010. Disposed of. 04.10.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE