Writ Petition (S) No. 2S01 of 2007 Petitioners 1. 2. Respondents Versus 1. 2. Muralidhar Rathiya S/o Shri Madhram Rathiya, aged about 39 years, Working as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Auramuda, Biock Gharghoda, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) Lakhan Lal Nishad S/o Shri Kursoram Nishad, aged about 38 years, Working as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Karichhapar, Block Gharghoda, Dist. Raigarh $C.G.) State of Chhattlsgarh Through the Seoretary, Department ofTribat Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Weifare Department, Raigarh, Tahsil and Distriot (C.G.) WRST PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTION Hon'ble Justice Shri Satish K._^nlhotri Present: Mr. Santosh K. Twari, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vinay Pandey, Panel lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on this 9 day of IVIay, 2007) 1. The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay soaie w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the daie of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petrtionere as welt as for the State/respondents jointly submit that ihe facts and question of lavv involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in W.P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushi! Tiwan and others Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), which was aliowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. 3. in view of the above submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition is aliowed in the same terms. No order as to oosts. ^ B/- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge