IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.26884 of 2001 Between: M/s. Gagan Electricals, EWS 1102, Rep. by its Proprietor G.Dasarath, S/o. Hanumaiah, HPHB Colony, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Principal, Osmania Medical College, Koti, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent, Rural Health Centre, Patancheru, Medak District. 3 The Executive Engineer, (R&B), Electrical Rural Division, Balkampet, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more especially in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in not arranging the payment following the Proceedings of the 3rd Respondent vide Lr.No.AE/EE/Elec./R&B/Rd/Hyd/est/2001-2002/469, dated 28.11.2001 for the work executed by the petitioner under agreement dated 8.1.2001 as illegal, arbitrary and unjustiﬁed and consequently direct the 1st respondent to make the ﬁnal bill payment forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.UDAYA BHASKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.26884 of 2001 ORDER: This writ petition has been ﬁled seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not arranging the payment to be made to the petitioner for the work executed by it under the agreement, dated 08-01-2001, as illegal and arbitrary. When the matter has been taken up for hearing on 29-07- 2008, none appeared for the petitioner and therefore, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption “for dismissal”. Today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing, neither learned counsel for the petitioner is present not is there any representation on its behalf. In fact, learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that no amounts are due and payable to the petitioner and in fact, an amount of Rs.28,631/- payable to the petitioner was already paid through cheque No.846848, dated 13- 02-2002, drawn on the State Bank of Hyderabad. If that be so, I am of the opinion that no cause of action survives in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 05-08-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MADHURI}