IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19259 of 2010 AMARDEEP SHARMA @ LUCHO SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 02.07.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the petition. Petitioner is languishing in jail in connection with a case registered under Sections 363, 366A of the I.P.C. In the F.I.R., it is alleged that Raja Kumar took the informant’s daughter. It is also alleged that the petitioner and one Chandan Kumar assisted Raja in committing offence. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that Raja and the victim girl, due to the love affairs eloped somewhere and the petitioner was deliberately been named in the case because he knew Raja Kumar. It is further submitted that in 164 Cr.P.C. statement, the victim girl has not named the petitioner as the person who forcefully took her but alleged that petitioner was standing near the Auto rickshaw. It is further submitted that the victim in 164 Cr.P.C. statement has named Amarjeet Sharma whereas petitioner’s name is Amardeep Sharma. 2 Learned counsel for the State has submitted that specific allegation is against Raja Kumar and the petitioner is alleged to have been found to be standing near the Auto rickshaw stand. It is further submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the fact that there is specific allegation against Raja Kumar and petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner namely Amardeep Sharma @ Lucho Sharma, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Begusarai Muffasil P.S. Case No. 430 of 2009. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)