IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12539 of 2009 Between: Toddy Tappers Cooperative Society, Tandoor village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, rep.by its President Shoban Babu ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Prl. Secretary Revenue (Excise -II) Department Secretariat Buildings, At Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner of Proh & Excise,Government of Andhra Pradesh At Excise bhavan,Hyderabad 3 The Superintendent of Proh & Excise,Rajendranagar at Excise Station,J.N.road,Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.SAI RAM GOUD Counsel for the Respondents:AGP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representation dated 18.6.2009 for granting of Toddy Group Licenses shop Nos.1,2,3 and Depot Licenses for the present excise year from 1.10.2008 to 30.9.2013 in respect of Toddy Group, Tandoor village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 18.6.2009 of the petitioner.” At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise submitted that respondent No.2 vide his order, dated 08.07.2009 rejected the petitioner’s representation for granting a fresh license. Sri B.Sai Ram Goud, learned counsel for the petitioner sought for permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition questioning the said order. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, WPMP.No.16224 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 13th JULY, 2009. kvni