IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2011 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 34893 of 2008(D) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- JOE I MANGALY, MANAGING PARTNER, MANGALY TIMBER & FURNITURE WORKS (PET BOTTLE DIVISION) B.O.C.COLLEGE BYE PASS ROAD, PALAKKAD-14. BY ADVS. SRI.P.J.MATHEW SRI.K.B.ARUNKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDUTHY BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, PALAKKAD-14. 3. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, A.P.T.S., PAPAKKAD. 4. ASSISTASNT ENGINEER, KSEB, OLAVAKKODE. 5. OMBUDSMAN, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1-4 BY ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.34893 of 2008 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th March, 2011 JUDGMENT It appears the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had represented before the Registrar (Judicial) on 18.3.2011 that the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition has thus come up for hearing before me today. When the writ petition was called on for hearing today, none appeared for the petitioner. There was also no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner. In such circumstances the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge. ahg. P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- W.P(C).No.34893 of 2008 ---------------------------- JUDGMENT 25th March, 2011