IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 2nd day of March 2005 Second Bail application no. 1078/2004 Order on the bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Shyam Singh S/o Gainda R/o Village- Rampur Raighati Police Station- Laksar, District Haridwar. ……Applicant. Versus State of Uttaranchal … Opposite Party. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arising out of case crime No. 127/2001 U/S 302 and 34 of I.P.C. P.S. Laksar District Haridwar By the Court Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. Heard Sh. Parikshit Saini learned counsel for the applicant, Sh. Diwakar Chamoli learned counsel for the complaint and Sh. G.S. Sandhu learnede AGA for the State. This is the 2nd bail application. The new ground taken is that there has been inordinate delay in conclusion of the trial. The submission can not be said to be without force. In view of it, will be just and proper to direct the Session Judge concerned to expedite the trial and conclude the same according to law. The Bail application is dismissed. The learned Session Judge, where the session trial no. 392 of 2001 is pending for disposal, is directed to dispose of the trial according to law, within a period of one month, from the date of the receipt of the copy of the order. It need to be impressed that for making the compliance of the order, the trial may be directed to proceed day to day, and if, necessary, coercive measure may be initiated against the prosecution witnesses. Dated:- 2-03-2005 (Justice Irshad Hussain) MK