[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVN.APPLN.NO.173 OF 2008 IN APPEAL NO.254 OF 2003 IN COMPLAINT NO.318 OF 2000 Mr.Deepak Vedprakash Sahani ..Applicant Vs. Hari Enterprises & Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.A.P.Mundargi counsel and Ms. L.A.Munim advocate i/b M/s.Rajesh Kothari & Co.for applicant Mr. A.P.Vanarse Adv. for Respondent No.1 Mr.S.S.Pednekar A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 18, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 18, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 18, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant-original accused, learned advocate for the respondent no.1-original complainant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The original complainant who is partner of the firm and the applicant are present in Court. 2. By judgment and order dated 3.9.2003, the learned Judicial Magistrate F.C. Court No.1 Pune [-2-] convicted the applicant under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act in SCC No. 318 of 2008. The appeal preferred by the applicant came to be dismissed, hence, this revision. 3. During the pendency of this revision, the parties have amicably settled the dispute among themselves and they have tendered consent terms which are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. In view of the consent terms, the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act is compounded and the applicant is acquitted thereunder. Bail bonds of the applicant shall stand cancelled. Liberty is granted to the complainant to withdraw the amount of Rs.1,60,000/- deposited by the applicant in this Court as well as Rs.20,000/- in the trial Court. Revision Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]