IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.798 of 2008 DAYANAND SINGH S/O SRI NAWAL KISHROE SINGH, PROPRIETOR M/S ASIRWAD INTERPRISES N.H.31 BUS STAND BALIYA, R/O MOHALLA- STATION ROAD, BALIYA, PS-& BLOCK- BALIYA, DISTT- BEGUSARAI----------------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BEGUSARAI 3. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER BEGUSARAI 4. THE BDO, BALIYA DISTT-BEGUSARAI- RESPONDENT 1ST SET 5. MANISH KUMAR S/O NOT KNOWN TRAINU I.A.S THEN POSTED AS BDO- BALIYA DISTT- BEGUSARAI AT PRESENT POSTED AS S.D.O. SASARAM, DISTT- ROHTAS. 6. SURESH PASWAN THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, BALIYA BLOCK 7. SRI BINAY KUMAR S/O NOT KNOWN POSTED AS JUNIOR ENGINEER BALIYA BLOCK, DISTT- BEGUSASRAI---RESPONDENT 2ND SET. ----------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy, Advocate For the State: Mr. A. Amanullah SC-17 ----------- 2 29.3.2010 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State, this Court is of the opinion that the nature of dispute raised by the petitioner being such that it cannot be adjudicated upon in a writ jurisdiction. If the petitioner feels that he has enough material and evidence in his hands to bring home the allegations and charges that somebody has withdrawn money from public fund even for the work for which the materials were supplied free by the petitioner he can either bring the charges before the competent court or approach the superior authority in this regard who may enquire into the matter. In view of above no direction can be passed on the prayer made by the petitioner. This writ application is dismissed with the liberty aforesaid. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)