IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20822 of 2010 RAJENDRA CHOUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 4/ 20.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner’s name appeared in the statement of vehicle owner as driver of the vehicle but while the raid was conducted, he was not found on the vehicle rather two others with fire arms. There is no document to show that petitioner was driver of the vehicle. Further according to the learned counsel, only to make a defence owner of the vehicle named this petitioner as driver of the vehicle. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No. 17 of 2001 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Nawada subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)