1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 1197 of 2008 [V.R. Kulkarni Vs. G.T. Agrawal & another] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. Padhye, Advocate holding for Mr. A.S. Jaiswal, Adv., for petitioner. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 28th March,2008. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by impugned order at Annexure-G [page 32] of the Writ Petition Paper-book. 3. Though evidence was closed, Trial Court has allowed the landlords' application to frame additional issue and reverted the trial back to the stage of evidence. 4. The question of alternate and suitable accommodation being available to the landlord touches the jurisdictional issue. Such issue has a direct bearing on the satisfaction of the Rent Controller. Whether eviction could be ordered would have a direct bearing on the comparative hardship as well. 2 5. Allowing framing of such issue and directing the parties to lead evidence, therefore, would not amount to permitting the parties to correct the mistakes and lapses or lacunae in the trial of suit. Therefore, impugned order does not suffer from any illegality or error of jurisdiction. 6. In the circumstances, no interference is called for. Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. Judge |Hedau|