• $-31 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. M.C. No.2379/2010 VIJAYKUMAR STATE&ANR. CORAM: ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Suman, Advocate. versus ..... Respondents Through: Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for the State. JUSTICE SHIV NARA YAN DHINGRA ORDER % 27.07.2010 This petition has been under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed for quashing of F.l.R. No.100 of 2010 under Section 354 IPC lodged by one party and quashing of complaint under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. lodged by the other party. The complainant in the F.l.R. under Section 354 IPC alleged that she was molested by her employer and employer lodged a complaint that she had committed cheating and theft. Now both of them have entered into a compromise and want that F .LR. should be quashed. It is obvious that both of them have used criminal justice as a tool to grind their personal grudge. If no offence had been committed, there was no reason for the parties to lodge F .LR. and if offence had been committed, I find no reason to allow this petition. Let the parties file application for compounding of offence or application for plea bargaining before trial court. There is no reason for quashing of F .I.Rs. The petition is hereby dismissed. JULY 27, 2010 'AA' SHIV NARAY,,DHINGRA, J. { Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified