IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9605 of 2008. Decided on: 23.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Sita Ram Chauhan. … Petitioner. Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. K.C. Sankhyan, Advocate vice M/s Bhuvnesh Sharma and Ramakant Sharma, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he has been overlooked for promotion to the post of Superintendent Grade-II. According to him, certain persons junior to him have been promoted as Superintendent Grade-II. It has come in the reply that no person junior to the petitioner has been promoted to the post of Superintendent Grade-II and promotions have been made strictly as per seniority assigned to every official on the basis of instructions issued by the State Government. Consequently, there is no merit in this petition and the 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - same is accordingly dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 23, 2010. (sck).