1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2353 OF 2008 IN L.P.A.ST.NO.4671 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4473 OF 2003. (ANIL CHAMPALAL CHOUDHARY & OTH. Vs DAMODHARDAS K. RATHI & OTH.) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Shri M.R.Joharapurkar, Advocate for Applicant. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR & R.C.CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : APRIL 25, 2008. 1. Shri Paliwal appears for Respondent No.1. None appears for respondent No.2, though served. No reply has been filed by any of the respondents to contravene the assertions made in the application. 2. The learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that he may be given time to file reply to this application. That request is rejected, as we are of the opinion that respondent No.1 had sufficient time to file reply as he was served 2 sufficiently in advance. Besides this delay is of 166 days, as computed by the office. As sufficient cause has been made out, the application is made absolute in terms of the prayer clause (1). JUDGE JUDGE RR.