IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19752 of 2011 1. Shiv Kishore Thakur Son Of Sri Raj Nath Thakur Resident of Village + Post-Gaura, Police Station-Bihiya, District-Bhojpur (Arrah). 2. Pramod Kumar Upadhyay Son of Sri Shiv Darshan Upadhayay Resident of Mohalla- Station Road, Piro, Police Station-Piro, District-Bhojpur (Arrah). 3. Dharmendra Tripathi Son of Late Bankatesh Tripathi Resident of Village-Parasiya Thakurai, Police Station-Nasriganj, District-Rohtas. Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Secondary Education, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5. The Regional Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Patna Division, Patna. 6. The District Education Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram. 7. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Rohtas at Sasaram. 8. The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram. 9. The District Programme Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram. 10. The District Welfare Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram. 11. The Chairman, District Board Rohtas cum Chairman, District Appointment Committee, Rohtas. Respondents. ----------- For the petitioners - Mr.S.C.Jha-3, Advocate For the State - A.C. to AAG-6 02 16.11.2011 The petitioners seek a direction to the respondents to comply with the orders of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Rohtas at Sasaram by which a direction has been given for appointment of the petitioners to the posts of Teacher. It is stated that despite their success before the Tribunal in terms of its orders as contained in Annexure-1, against which a review petition filed by the State Respondents also having been rejected (Annexure-7 series), the petitioners are yet to be allowed to join their duties. Learned counsel for the State is present and is heard. 2 With the consent of the parties this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh representation before Respondent no.6 within a period of two weeks hereof and the same, if filed, shall be disposed of as expeditiously as possible after hearing the parties with a view to giving effect to the order of Tribunal (Annexure-1) if there are no disentitling reasons. With the above observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Chandran (Vikash Jain, J.)