1 caw-1601-09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1601 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2668 OF2008 Mr.Amar Singh Tomar and Ors. ..Applicants Vs. Union of India and Anr. ..Respondents .... Mr. Nitin A.Kulkarni Adv. for Applicants Mr. T.J.Pandian Adv. for Respondent/petitioner in writ petition. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : AUGUST 4th , 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants. 2. This application has been preferred by the applicants in Writ Petition No. 2668 of 2008 wherein the applicants are respondents. In the present application, it is prayed that the applicants be allowed to sell food items on platform nos.1 to 4 of Pune Railway Station by purchasing food items from outside agency. It is seen that the main petition is pending. In the said petition, while granting rule by order 2 caw-1601-09 dated 22nd September, 2008, this Court has observed that the respondents i.e. the present applicants shall be permitted to work on the same terms and conditions as they are working on the date of the order. Thus, it is seen that the respondents have not been precluded from working provided that they work on the same terms and conditions on which they were working on the date of the order. 3. The learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that it is not permissible to purchase food items from outside agency and sell the same on the platforms. In my opinion, it is not necessary to enter into this controversy and it would be appropriate that instead the main Writ Petition i.e. W.P.No. 2668 of 2008 is fixed for final hearing at the earliest. In view of the above, Writ Petition No. 2668 of 2008 be placed on the final hearing board in the week commencing from 22nd September, 2009. 4. In view of the fact that the writ petition is placed for final hearing, at this stage, I am not inclined to consider the prayer in this application. Accordingly, the application is disposed of. [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]