CWP(T) No. 12221/2008 19.11.2009 Present: Mr. Narinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 3. The petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No. 4. The suitability of the petitioner and respondent No. 4 was adjudged by a duly constituted Selection Committee. The petitioner has secured 48.77 marks and respondent No. 4 has secured 48.96 marks. The petitioner and respondent No. 4 have been allowed marks on the basis of experience. The appointment was made on a contract basis. Since the suitability has been adjudged by a duly constituted Selection committee, this Court cannot reassess the merits of the candidates afresh. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (R.B. Misra), Acting Chief Justice (Rajiv Sharma), Judge November 19,2009. *awasthi*