IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 4TH OCTOBER 2007 / 12TH ASWINA 1929 WP(C).No. 18349 of 2007(H) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------ 1. SHIHABUDDHIN, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. SALI RAWTHER, THONDALIL HOUSE, POORUVAZHI P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. SAJEETHA BEEVI, AGED 38 YEARS, W/O. SHIHABUDDIN, THONDALIL HOUSE, POORUVAZHI P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF SRI.BIJUMON E.A. RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOLLAM. 3. DIRECTOR OF SURVEY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. SUPERINTENDENT, OFFICE OF SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, KOTTARAKKARA. 5. TAHSILDAR, KUNNATHOOR TALUK, SASTHAMCOTTA P.O. 6. VILLAGE OFFICER, POORUVAZHI, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 18349 OF 2007 --------------------- Dated this the 4th day of October, 2007 J U D G M E N T Grievance of the petitioners is that although they owned one acre of land by virtue of Ext.P1 title deed, in the resurvey that was conducted, some mistakes had crept in. According to them, this mistake resulted in reduction of the extend of land to less than one acre. Therefore petitioners filed Ext.P3 objection before the 4th respondent. 2. According to them, no action has been taken on Ext.P3. However, in the meanwhile an attempt was made to evict them and therefore they filed this writ petition. 3. Learned Government Pleader on instructions submit that presently no action has been taken against the petitioners for forceful eviction. This is recorded. If Ext.P3 objection filed by the petitioners has been received and is pending before the 4th respondent, the 4th respondent shall take up the same and pass appropriate orders thereon, with notice to the petitioners, within four weeks of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Until orders are passed as above, the status quo as on today shall be maintained till then. The writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE vps