1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10043 OF 2010 Satish s/o Babanrao Deshmukh & others .. PETITIONERS VERSUS S.T. Gunjal & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. A.N. Nagargoje, advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, AGP for the State. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 28 th OCTOBER, 2010. PER COURT : 1 The grievance made in the petition is in respect of cross examination of the witness at the instance of the petitioners. The petitioners have made complaint that the Presiding Officer is not permitting the petitioners to put questions to the witness during cross examination and as such their right to cross examine the witness is adversely affected. Learned AGP states that the Presiding Officer is present in the court and he has assured to permit the petitioners to put the questions to the witness during the course of cross examination. 2 2 If the Presiding Officer is of the opinion that the questions are irrelevant or inadmissible he may record the question as well as the answer given by the witness in that behalf and may consider the effect thereof while passing final order. With these observations the petition stands disposed of. 3 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp10043.10.odt