[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1048 OF 2005 Raza Academy & Anr. .... Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents Shri Nitin Pradhan with Ms Shubhada Khot for the Petitioners. Shri B.H. Mehta, A.P.P., for the Respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & P.V. KAKADE, JJ. DATED: DATED: DATED: APRIL 21, 2005 P.C: P.C: P.C: Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioners and the A.P.P. The learned A.P.P. has placed before us certain documents pertaining to the policy decision as well as the communication between the concerned Departments which reveal details regarding the decision taken while rejecting the application of the petitioners for permission for taking out a religious procession on 22-4-2005. Various facts disclosed from those records, which were also revealed to the Advocate for the petitioners, evidently disclose justification for refusal of the permission. Apart from the fact that the permission has been refused in consonance with the policy decision, the facts revealed from those documents obviously justify the decision and therefore no [2] interference is called for in writ jurisdiction in the order dated 15-3-2005 passed by the respondent No.3 and which is sought to be challenged. Hence the petition is rejected. (R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.) (P.V. Kakade, J.)