WPCRL No. 117 of 2010 With Stay App. No. 782 / 10 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Anil Dabral, Advocate present for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State present for respondent No. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Brief Holder for respondent No. 1. By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing of the first information report dated 02.02.2010, registered with Naib Tehsildar, Dhari, District Nainital, as Crime No. 03 of 2010, relating to offences punishable under Section 394, 457, 504, 506, 323 of I.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. He is a contractor, and has no reason to commit robbery as alleged in the first information report, lodged against him. It is further pointed out that the petitioner’s brother himself has got lodged a first information report against the son of the present complainant (respondent No. 2). Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, since this Court in its writ jurisdiction, cannot enter into the factual dispute, as such, not inclined to interfere with the impugned first information report. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed summarily with the observation that if the petitioner surrenders before the court concerned, and moves application for bail, his bail application shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay. (Stay Application No. 782 of 2010 also stands dismissed). (P.C. P., J.) 19.02.2010 HN