IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 10200 of 1998 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 17, 2011 Dharampal and others. ….Petitioners Versus The Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Hisar and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr. L.N. Verma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana, for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. None for respondent Nos. 5 to 16. 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Alok Singh, J. (Oral) As per Mr. L.N. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Gaurav Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, the only controversy involved in the present case is As to whether Civil Court or Revenue Court has jurisdiction to grant occupancy right under the Punjab Occupancy Tenants (Vesting of Proprietary Rights) Act, 1953. CWP No.10200 of 1998 Mr. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners, as well as, Mr. Dhir, learned State Counsel fairly state that now controversy has already been decided by the Full Bench of this Court in the matter of Shiv Charan vs. The Financial Commissioner, Revenue Department, Haryana and others reported in (2004-3) The Punjab Law Reporter, 569, therefore, present petition be disposed of in the same terms. Present petition stands disposed of in terms of Shiv Charan’s case (supra). Order impugned stands set aside. Parties shall be at liberty to approach Civil Court as per the ratio of Full Bench judgment. August 17, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2