WP(C) 667/2011 BEFORE HON\BLE MR JUSTICE B D AGARWAL Heard Mr. S Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. MK Mishra, learned counsel for the State respondents. This application has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Const itution of India, praying for a direction to the Respondents to consider the wri t petitioner to appoint him in a suitable post against 10% quota, reserved for t he sons and unmarried daughters of retired school teachers from Primary to Secon dary School level. Apparently , the father of the petitioner retired on 31.03.2001 and the petition er applied for a job for the first time in 10.11.2008.Be that as it may, there i s no averments in the writ petition that the Government and the school authorit y has advertised any post. Hence, the writ petition is disposed with observation that as and when any post is advertisement, the petitioner shall be entitle to apply for his appointment a nd on such application the concerned authority shall consider the candidature vi s-à-vis his merit. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.