IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 28TH DECEMBER 2010 / 7TH POUSHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 8763 of 2010() ------------------------------------------- SC.NO.471/2004 OF ADDL.SESSIONS COURT FAST TRACK COURT NO.II , PALAKKAD. ..... (CRIME NO.170/2003 OF ALATHUR POLICE STATION,PALAKKAD DISTRICT) ..... APPLICANT:ACCUSED: ----------------------------------- RAJEEV, S/O.RAMANKUTTY, KUNDUTHODU VEEDU, KAZHANI, PADOOR P.O., PALAKKAD. BY SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU, SENIOR ADVOCATE, BY ADV. SRI. M.REVIKRISHNAN, SRI.UNNI SEBASTIAN KAPPAN. RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTING THE S.I.OF POLICE, ALATHUR POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. ================================== Bail Application No.8763 of 2010 ================================== Dated this the 28 th day of December, 2010. ORDER Petitioner, who is the accused in S.C.No.471 of 2004 on the file of Addl. Sessions Court, Fast Track - II, Palakkad, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.Admittedly non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Court below and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the court below and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of, preferably, on the same date on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioner. This Bail Application is, accordingly, disposed of. V. RAMKUMAR,JUDGE. rv