IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45071 of 2010 1. BACHCHU SAW son of Hareshwar Saw 2. Chano Devi @ Chando Devi w/o Bachchu Saw 3. Pramod Saw son of Bachchu Saw. All resident of village- Mangaruadih, P.S. Sono, District- Jamui. … Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the State. Considering the fact that the allegation under Section 498 A is against husband Prakash Saw and three petitioners before this Court are father-in-law, mother-in- law as also Dewar and that the similarly situated persons Upendra Sao and Musho Devi have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court by order dated 26.8.2010 in Cr. Misc. No. 26762 of 2010 and order dated 7.7.2010 in Cr. Misc. No. 17388 of 2010 respectively, this Court would direct for release of the petitioners, namely, Bachchu Saw, Chano Devi @ Chando Devi and Pramod Saw on bail in the event they would surrender within a period of four weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Jamui in connection with Complaint Case No. 994C/08, subject 2 to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to the following conditions:- (i) The two bail bonds will be furnished, one by the Government servant and the other by a close family relative. (ii) The petitioners will remain present in course of trial on each and every day and their absence even for a single day would automatically entail the consequences of cancellation of their bail. (iii) The petitioners in case are now made accused in any other criminal case, that would itself lead to cancellation of their bail. Subject to the aforementioned conditions, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)