,, y j'Y -3> (^' |M TUC (S's.: e ^ijtn r wn.6—i°t l irflfc-i-K? fC.G.1 I^E^S'RONER ^-"'^••' S^'^'fc^ -/> l^-:^?"^ ^yf^. '^^ VERSU; WA NO$Z/^5...J2003 ^ 1. Smt. Umat^utBansthiya Aged about ^C.yeaTs VVd/0 Late Shri Motichand Bandhiya R/OatPostl TasnilPathria District (Cfihaffiagarh) Through ©enerai the AeGouhtarit Raipur (Ghhattisgari^) 2. TEte Btock DeveSopment Cyffiieer 1-ormi, Djsft. Bilaspur (C.G;)] 'Clte Additional Assistar»f D|aiie!opFnent X2omn|)issi0n^" Lctrmi, DistS. Btiaspur{C.B S^tg of Cfehaffisgaith tti|QughlSecretwys ® tl • -'.isiiUHa .'i'-ii:l1;<k^'TS . •:^^-nil,?:S..y^; department.ofG.A.D. D.I^.S. Bhav3n,^tipur 3(§yi3tt!sgas1i) ;<"- -^/ ^22S@27 QF TNE CONSTiTUTiON JjF APPRQPRiATE WRSTS^lRiS R SSSOANCl OF JUSTlCEJN-FHEMATTeR; XI-HC-22 •gsg st|l*ll<!)*l,»-al'y<is,I°tfli'Ml< as 1. „) i^I R-li<* silfSl sti*flqi^n '^SK ;S'zf33/c5 tltCTI St><li<t)"""'""""""~"""""""""*(t;t 2<M ISre^sr aii?!(i <wwal%v 23.1.2004 Petitioaer by SUri Malay S^ Stete by Shd Ranbir Smg|i, Govt. Advocate. Hcaid. Thc niain grievaace of petition undcr Article 226/227 employee of the State of Madhj thc State and was retircd &oid Extenslon Officer on 28.2.] supcraimuati.on. At the time ol] <f>i^i^i^i;i ^Qv^ "^1%^ '^^1? ^TaipOTsii^r ihaduri, Advocate. fhe petitioiier raised in this writ of fhe Gonsti.tution of India, is fhat the petitioner is a widow of lat^ Shri Motichaad Budhiya who was DMtrict-Bilaspur. At the ttme i^f deaffi of peti.tioner's husband aa aniouat of Rs. l,60,006/- was the pctitioner is gcttiBg pcnsy>ij aforesaid G.P.F amount^ias] respondents No. 2 and 3 had] G.P.F. of fhe peti.tioner's hu^ fa. Pradesli before Reorganization of fhc post ofAssistant Dcvclopincnt 1997 OQ attaming fhe ay of relirement he was posted at Lonmu, ^yiag in the G.P.F; accoiuit. Though afler dcattt ofhcr husband but fhc not yet becu paid to her. The sent fhe details of (tic aiaount of iband to the Accountaat General, Madbya Pradesh vide Annexure^ P/1 aad P/2 but fhe fuU axid fiiial paynicnt of above G.P.F. am|ount has notibecn madc to thc petitioner. Therefore, teamed eojunset fer the petltfoner submits that fhe petitfoner may be atkwcd 1|o make a detaited reprcseutafion to tfae AcGOUittaut General, St^tte of Chliattisgariti, RaipuT^e. Respondent No.l and he be dn|ected to consider the represeritation of fhc pctitipiicr and makc fup and final pEymcxit of fhe Qi.P.F. tr^ XI-HC-22 3S';'B2)ia3,aai'8<is,fts"ss<, wini a»witi» •w. 200 1N^^ 3H^I^it ft-ii* sv^s Db*fi<* ^ili^ I^ 91Kff?igBg<: 'vSss <t>l<tf?i4-< w)A ^ift^'^N^K ^sfwssKs amozmt, for which teamed Sr, Sta|idmg Gouasel for Union of India has no objection. Having heard learaed coui^sel for ftie parties aad Iiaving regsud to thc facts and ciK:um.sta4ces of fhc casc the pctitfoucr is aUowed to matee a detailed represc4tetion withui a period of 10 days firem today to ffae Respondcut N<{ representation wittun a period of3$ days fixun the date ofreceiptof the reprcsentation ia aa objective .1 who in turu wiU decide the manner by 'passing a reasoaed ordcr about fhc claua of'tfac petitto^cr for Gr.P.F. amcninfc With tbfi abc^jobservations^ite pelitkm is disposed Offinatty. Parties are entitled for certifiejl copy ofttus_order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge •I Wl ll'il 1 IV i? v