IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2614 OF 2005 Ashok Narayan Jiwani ...Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... None for Applicant. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DECEMBER 21, 2005. DECEMBER 21, 2005. DECEMBER 21, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. I am at a loss to understand why letter sent by the Applicant dated 27th December 2004 has been treated as Petition. All that the Applicant was interested in knowing was whether any criminal Appeal has been filed on his behalf on the Appellate Side against the order of conviction, and if so, the order passed therein and at whose instance the said appeal has been instituted (the name of Advocate on record) and whether he has filed Vakalatnama. Such queries can be answered on : 2 : the administrative side. None of these queries can be answered on the judicial side. 2. The Registrar shall take appropriate steps as may be advised. The matter be treated as closed and consigned to the record, except steps to be taken by the Registrar so as to respond to the queries of the Applicant. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.