Civil Revision No. 1181 of 2010 -1- *** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1181 of 2010 Date of decision : 23.2.2010 Gurnam Saini ....Petitioner Versus Master Amar Singh Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Sushil Saini, Advocate for the petitioner S. D. ANAND, J. Though the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is not in a position to dispute that the petitioner herein did avail of four opportunities for filing of the pleadings, the only request presently made is for grant of one final opportunity in the relevant behalf. The essential purpose of administration of justice is to prefer adjudication of a controversy on merits thereof. It is not that the petitioner had not been accountable for dereliction in not having filed the pleadings in time, this Court also cannot for unmindful of the fact that grave injustice would be caused to the petitioner herein if he was not allowed to file the pleadings at the trial. The petition shall stand allowed in limine. The disposal of this petition in limine with a view to expedite the disposal of the proceedings, proceeds on an assumption that there is no factual inaccuracy in the averment on behalf of the petitioner. If it transpires, at any subsequent point of time that this order had been obtained on the basis of any incorrect Civil Revision No. 1181 of 2010 -2- *** averment, it (order of this Court) would be liable to be reviewed. The petitioner herein shall file the pleadings before the learned Rent Controller on 12.3.2010 subject to payment of Rs.3000/- as costs. If the costs are not paid the learned Trial Court shall not have the pleadings on record. February 23, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE