1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. REVIEW PETITION (LODG.) NO.64 OF 2009 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.769 OF 2009 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.187 OF 2004 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.3835 OF 2003 Emkay Exports and others ..Petitioners. Vs. Madhusudan Srikrishna ..Respondent. .... Mr. H.N. Thakore i/b Thakore Jariwala & Associates for the Petitioners. Mr. N.D. Jaywant for the Respondent. .... CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 6th November, 2009. P.C. : 1. Upon the delay being condoned, the Review Petition is taken on Board by consent and is called out for hearing. 2. In ground (c) of the Review Petition, it has been stated that 2 the affidavit in reply was served on 8th July, 2009 and a sufficient opportunity was not given to the Petitioners to file a rejoinder. The statement which is made in the Review Petition is baseless. When the Chamber Summons was argued, no application for adjournment whatsoever was made before the Court to file a rejoinder. In fact, counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff – decree holder states that a copy of the reply had been served on 6th July, 2009 and not 8th July, 2009 as stated in ground (c) of the Review Petition. At the hearing of the Review Petition, learned counsel has submitted that this Court had dismissed the Chamber Summons by observing, in paragraph 3 of the judgment that the period of two years which was required to pay the decreetal amount was manifestly unreasonable. Learned counsel states that an effort was made to resolve the dispute with the decree holder by finding a reasonable solution, but that has not been possible. No ground whatsoever for the exercise of the jurisdiction in review under Order 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure is made out. The Review Petition stands dismissed. *****