( 1 ) cria4826.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4826 OF 2010 Vitthal Rambhau Bodkhe & Anr. .. Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondent Mr. S.S. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. N.H. Borade, A.P.P. for the respondents. CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR,J. DATED : 16.12.2010 P.C. :- 1. Heard. The application is for anticipatory bail. The offence alleged against the applicants is punishable under Section 384 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. The F.I.R. prima facie shows that the truck vehicle was driven away from near S.T. stand of Shirdi. It is argued that the averment in the private complaint case and the F.I.R. is discrepant. My attention is invited to the report ( 2 ) cria4826.10 submitted by the Police Inspector of Shirdi Police Station. In this application, there is no blaring discrepancy in the private complaint and the F.I.R. The investigation is directed under Section 156 (3) of the Cr.P.C. The applicants have not produced any tangible material to prima facie make out a case regarding their partnership business with the original complainant i.e. owner of the truck vehicle in question. It appears that applicant No.1 lodged a counter F.I.R., wherein such averment was made for the first time, but same is without support of any corroborative evidence. Considering the allegations, involvement of the applicants is required to be ascertained after due investigation. 3. No merits. Dismissed. [V.R. KINGAONKAR,J.] snk/2010/DEC10/cria4826.10