IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40680 of 2008 SANJEEV MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.10.2008 Heard Sri Rajani Kant Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. There is absolutely no discussion of any material which could justify the rejection order passed by the Sessions Judge, Kaimur at Bhabua of the prayer for bail of the petitioner except that the name of the petitioner was disclosed by the co-accused in his confession before the police. The contention is that the petitioner disputes his participation and it would have been proper and appropriate that the petitioner who is in custody since 28.9.2007 should have been put on test identification parade for establishing his identity. The Sessions Judge has dismissed the prayer for bail keeping in view the serious nature of the offence and complicity of the petitioner. For justifying the complicity, this court also feels that there was no sufficient material against the petitioner. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Kaimur at Bhabua in Kudara P.S.Case No.52 of 2006. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )