IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC (T) No. 69 of 2008 Decided on: 18th October, 2010 Ravinder Kumar Petitioner Versus Ashok Thakur and another Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh , Judge For the Petitioner: Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K.Vema, Dy. A.G. __________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The grievance of the petitioner is that there is no proper compliance of the order passed by the Tribunal on 25th April, 2003. The petitioner had approached the Tribunal seeking promotional avenues. While the matter was pending before the Tribunal, it was brought to the notice of the Tribunal that the department had made Annexure A-7 proposal. In that view of the matter, without going into the merits, the Tribunal disposed of the petition with a direction to the respondents to provide promotional avenues to the applicant by finalizing the proposal, as was proposed by the respondents, as per Annexure A-7. It is seen from the records that the department had moved for finalizing Annexure A-7.However, the Government rejected the proposal. Finally, Council of Ministers, in its meeting held on 28.8.2007 resolved that the percentage distribution would be monument supervisors 25%, senior monument attendants 25% and monument attendants 50%. There was also a decision to amend the R&P Rules accordingly. 2. In view of the above developments, we do not find any willful disobedience of the order passed by the Tribunal. We do not also hence find any contumacious conduct on the part of the respondents. Therefore the COPC is dismissed, without prejudice to the liberty to the petitioner, if so advised, to pursue his grievance in appropriate proceeding. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice ( Justice Kuldip Singh ), October 18, 2010(K) Judge