IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH MARCH 2011 / 25TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 8248 of 2011(E) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- T.RADHIKA, D/O.T.JANAKI, AGED 44 YEARS, LAKSHMI NAGAR, HOSDURG VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, LAW AND ORDER, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, LAW AND ORDER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KASARAGOD, PIN-671 121. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEELESHWAR, PIN-673 572. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEELESHWAR, PIN-673 572. 5. KARIMBIL BALACHANDRAN, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.RAGHAVAN, CHENNALAM, KARINTHALAM VILLAGE AND POST, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN-671 315. 6. CHANDRIKA, AGED 34 YEARS, W/O.BALACHANDRAN, CHENNALAM, KARINTHALAM VILLAGE AND POST, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN-671 315. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. T.K. VIPINDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: SMT R. BASANT & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.8248 of 2011-E ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT Basant,J. The petitioner owns property adjacent to the property of respondents 5 and 6. There evidently is a dispute regarding the property between the petitioner and respondents 5 and 6. The petitioner is already before the civil court and has secured Ext.P1 interim order of injunction. The crux of the grievance of the petitioner is that notwithstanding Ext.P1 order, there is interference with her peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property by respondents 5 and 6. 2. The petitioner must complain to the civil court which has passed Ext.P1 order about its violation. The petitioner can seek assistance of the civil court for enforcement of the order of injunction. Without and before doing that, the petitioner is not W.P.(C) No.8248 of 2011 -: 2 :- entitled to come to this Court and seek issue of directions under Art.226 of the Constitution claiming police protection. We are not persuaded to invoke our extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction. 3. This writ petition is, in these circumstances, dismissed with the above observations. Sd/- R. BASANT (Judge) Sd/- K. SURENDRA MOHAN (Judge) Nan/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge