SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3218 OF 2010 Kamal N. Changani ..Applicant v/s M/s Jalaram Enterprises and Ors. ..Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3219 OF 2010 Rajini M. Changani ..Applicant. v/s. M/s Jalaram Enterprises and Ors. ..Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3220 OF 2010 Shobha Radhakishin ..Applicant. v/s. M/s Jalaram Enterprises and Ors. ..Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3221 OF 2010 Swati R. Changani ..Applicant. v/s. M/s. Jalaram Enterprises and Ors. ..Respondents. Ms Maya V. Udeshe i/by Shri L.P.Kamal ,advs. For the Applicants. Ms P.P.Shinde, APP For the Respondent/State. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 7, 2011. P.C. 1 Ms Maya V. Udeshe advocate appears and seeks adjournment on the ground that the learned counsel is not available to - 2 - argue the case and also that the matter is likely to be settled. 2 Record reveals that these applications were filed in June, 2010 seeking leave to prefer appeals and whenever the matters were listed, the advocate for the applicants out of turn made a mention and got the matter adjourned presumably because the applicants were not interested in prosecuting the same. On 13th July, 2011, the learned counsel for the applicants had actually stated that the parties have amicably settled the matter and they wanted time just to ensure that payments are made as per the settlement. Two months have passed thereafter. It appears that the matter is already settled between the parties and the applicants are only interested in keeping the matter pending before the Court for the purpose of recovery. 3 In view of the above, all these applications stand dismissed for want of prosecution. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)