IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 86 of 2010 (S/B) Om Prakash Gupta …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others …Respondents Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, ACJ. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Sri Lok Pal Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Vinay Kumar, the learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1, 3 & 4. Smt. Beena Pande, the learned Standing Counsel (State of U.P.) for respondent No. 2. Office report dated 7th June, 2011 indicates that respondent No. 5 has been served. No one appears on behalf of respondent No. 5 till date. The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that relief no. 1 has already been granted to the petitioner, namely, that he has been paid his arrears of salary, but states that the amount relating to Group Insurance has not been released so far. Since respondent no. 5, i.e., the Committee of Management is not before the Court, we dispose of the writ petition with the direction that the petitioner may file an appropriate representation before the Committee of Management for release of his Group Insurance. If such a representation is made, the Committee of Management will decide the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order within six weeks thereafter. (V.K. Bist, J.) (Tarun Agarwala, ACJ.) 08-08-2011 Salim/