1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR . CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.APPA 216 OF 2010. ULHAS S/O PRABHAKAR CHINCHNIKAR VS RAJNIKANT K. MANDVIYA ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri S. D. Harode Advocate for the applicant. Shri A. N. Vastani, Advocate for respondent State. Coram : A.H. JOSHI, J. Date : 30th March, 2010. 1. Perused the judgment. 2. It is seen that the learned trial Judge has held that dishonour memo was not proved because it did not bear signature and stamp of the Bank. 3. It is seen that the complainant has not made any efforts to prove dishonour by bringing any other evidence. The fact of dishonour being an essential ingredient of the case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, the order of acquittal cannot be said to be erroneous or contrary to record. 2 4. The application has no merit. Application and appeal are rejected. Judge |mule|