IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 25TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 6TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 6204 of 2010(A) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- GEORGE JOSEPH KURUVINAKUNNEL HOUSE, CHEMMALAMATTOM PO. BY ADV. SRI.SHAJI THOMAS PORKKATTIL SRI.BINU PAUL SRI.T.V.VINU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA CO-OPERTIVE TRIBUNAL PANDAEOTHOOPE LANE, SREEKANDESWARAM, FORT PO THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ERNAKULAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER ERNAKULAM. 3. THE SPECIAL SALE OFFICER ERNAKULAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, ERNAKULAM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO.6204 OF 2010 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is the appellant in AP No.83 of 2003 before the Kerala Co-operative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram. The appeal was filed against the order in ARC 13 of 2008 of the Joint Registrar of Co- operative Societies, Ernakulam. The bank had filed a case against the petitioner for recovery of amounts that were alleged to have been wrongly credited to his account. According to the petitioner, though the appeal was finally decided, no certified copy of the order has been issued to the petitioner. The petitioner contends that he has already submitted an application for the issue of a certified copy to him. At the same time, the second respondent Bank has been issued with a copy of the order and the bank is proceeding with the execution of the same. The petitioner therefore prays for appropriate directions to ensure that the certified copy is issued to him on an early date. 2. I have heard Adv.P.C.Surendranath, standing counsel for the second respondent as well as learned Government Pleader. Wpc 6204/2010 2 3. In view of the fact that the petitioner's application for issue of a certified copy of the order of the Tribunal is pending, the same can be directed to be disposed of on an early date. The petitioner wants to challenge the said order before the appropriate authority, which he is not able to do without a certified copy. 4. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to issue a certified copy of the final order in A.P.83 of 2003, if the same has not already been issued, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. In the meantime, the execution proceedings initiated against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance for a period of one month. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE lgk