1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 1696 OF 2010. Municipal Council, Risod. -: versus :- Aasaram Bhagaji Gite. WRIT PETITION No. 1697 OF 2010. Municipal Council, Risod. -: versus :- Sk. Nyaju Mohd. Sk. Musa. WRIT PETITION No. 1698 OF 2010. Municipal Council, Risod. -: versus :- Gajanan Nivrutti Walke WRIT PETITION No. 1699 OF 2010. Municipal Council, Risod. -: versus :- Ku. Rajani Dyandev Ingole WRIT PETITION No. 1700 OF 2010. Municipal Council, Risod. -: versus :- Ashok Athawale WRIT PETITION No. 1701 OF 2010. Municipal Council, Risod. -: versus :- Umesh Janrao Sarnaik WRIT PETITION No. 1702 OF 2010. Municipal Council, Risod. -: versus :- Sk. Kalim Sk. Amir WRIT PETITION No. 1703 OF 2010. Municipal Council, Risod. -: versus :- Sudhirkumar Ramchandra More WRIT PETITION No. 1704 OF 2010. Municipal Council, Risod. -: versus :- Bhanudas Bhaguji Gite. WRIT PETITION No. 1705 OF 2010. Municipal Council, Risod. -: versus :- Nitesh Ganpat Sawalkar WRIT PETITION No. 1706 OF 2010. Municipal Council, Risod. -: versus :- Sau. Charushila P. Natha Chaudhari WRIT PETITION No. 1707 OF 2010. Municipal Council, Risod. -: versus :- Manojkumar Ramchandra More. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : OCTOBER 11, 2010. Heard Mrs. Anjali Joshi, learned Counsel for Petitioner and Shri N.B. Kalwaghe, learned Counsel for respective respondents in all matters. He is seeking time to file reply, however, I find that the learned Member of the 2 Industrial Court has granted interim reinstatement as stop- gap arrangement and expedited the ULPA Complaints filed by the respective respondents before the Labour Court. The common order passed by the Industrial Court shows that petitioner Municipal Council is directed to allow the respondents to work with it as daily wagers. It is apparent that the Municipal Council is under obligation to provide work to them on daily wages as and when work is available and as and when the employee reports for duty. I, therefore, do not find any prejudice caused to the petitioner because of the interim orders. ULPA Complaints are already expedited. Hence, Writ Petitions are disposed of with above observations and directions. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.