IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6515 OF 2009 DATE OF DECISION: APRIL 20 ,2011 Sumer Singh .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. A. P. Bhandari, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Patter, DAG, Haryana, for the State. Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate, for respondent No.2. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. After arguing for sometime, counsel for the petitioner prays for an adjournment to file amended petition to challenge the vires of the provisions whereby reservation has been made for selected class. The petitioner may file a fresh petition to challenge the vires of the reservation on the conditions contained in the brochure on any ground that may be available. At the same time, counsel also prays that the respondents have unfairly forfeited the security deposited by the petitioner. Apparently, the order passed by the respondents to forfeit the security on the ground that he had applied in a wrong category, would not appear justified. In the meantime, the respondents would refund the forfeited amount. The present writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition on all the grounds that are available to him. April 20,2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE