IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.9311 of 2005 Between: Smt. Pokala Ratna Kumari W/o Bhavannarayana R/o D. No. 26-39-129/203/A, Extension of A.T. AGraharam, Guntur ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Circle Inspector of Police, Guntur II Town Circle, Guntur District 2 The Station House Officer, nagarapalem P.S., Nagarapalem Guntur District 3 Smt. Butla Sita Mahalakshmi @ Machamma W/o Sambasiva Rao R/o 10th Lane, Chaitanya nagar, AT Agrahram Guntur-4 .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRit fo Mandmaus, to declare the action of the Respondnet police in interfering with the Civil disptes between the petitioner and Respondnet No.3 and summning the petitioenr to the police station time and again and threatening with dire consequences, is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unjust and violative of ARticles 19 and 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondnet police not to interfer with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.NAGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.9311 of 2005 ORDER: Petitioner seeks to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent and summoning the petitioner to the police station time and again and threatening with dire consequences as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct them not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner. This court while admitting the writ petition on 26-04-2005 directed respondents 1 and 2 not to summon or interfere with the personal life and liberty to the petitioner. However, this order does not preclude the respondents to investigate, in case, any prima facie is found, but not to summon or interfere with the liberty of the petitioner. A counter has been filed stating that police never interfered with the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent and they never summoned the petitioner to the police station at any point of time. As no case is registered against the petitioner, the question of summoning the petitioner to the police station does not arise. In view of the denial of all the allegations made in the writ affidavit, I am of the opinion that no orders are required to be passed in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 24-04-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRT}