1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1887 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 1851 OF 2008 M/s.Raj Estate .... Plaintiff V/s. Flora M. D'Souza & Ors. .... Defendants And M/s. SGM Developers & Construction Pvt. Ltd. .... Respondents ..... Ms.Rasika Bagkar for the plaintiff. None for the defendants. Ms.Asha Bhuta i/by A.A.Law for the respondents. ..... CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATE : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the plaintiff and the respondents. 2. The Chamber Summons is taken out by the plaintiff for permission to join a a respondents as defendant nos. 4 to 7 to 2 the suit. Predecessor of defendant nos. 1 to 3, the original owners of the suit property agreed to sale the same to the plaintiff. Subsequently, even defendant nos. 1 to 3 confirmed the agreement of sale. 3. The present suit is for specific performance of the contract against defendant nos. 1 to 3. It is the contention of the plaintiff that defendant nos. 1 to 3 during the pendency of the suit, transferred the suit property to the respondents. The contention has not been denied by the respondents. 4. In that view of the matter, I am of the opinion that the respondents are necessary party. The Chamber Summons is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) (c). The necessary amendments shall be carried out within two weeks from today. Thereafter, within two weeks, the amended copy shall be served to the defendants. 3. Stand over to 17th March 2010. (R. V. MORE, J.) 3