IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 109 OF 2009 MINGUELINA FERNANDES @ MINGUELINA BARRETO AND 2 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Ryan Menezes, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. A. Kamat, Addl. Government Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- P. B. MAJMUDAR & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 2nd March, 2009 P.C. Learned Addl. Government Advocate has submitted that in Writ Petition no. 655/08, the very same notification was challenged and statement was also made on behalf of the State Government that the Government does not wish to acquire the lands by applying urgency clause and that opportunity would be given to the petitioners to lodge their objections as envisaged by Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act. It is submitted that similar statement was also made in Writ Petition no.738/08. 2. Considering the said aforesaid aspect, now, the urgency clause is treated to be withdrawn. 3. It is pointed out that the petitioner has already lodged his objections under Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act. If the petitioner wants to submit any additional representation, the same may be made within a period of three weeks from today. The Land Acquisition officer, shall thereafter, proceed further, in accordance with law, in the matter of submitting his report to the State Government. 4. The Petition is, accordingly, disposed off subject to what is stated hereinabove. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. U. D. SALVI, J. arp/*