IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKAHD AT NAINITAL Delay Condonation Application No. 7971 of 2009 IN Special Appeal No. 180 of 2009 Prem Vidhiyalaya Sabha Narsan … Appellant Vs Committee of Management Raja Mahendra Pratap … Respondents Sri Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the appellant Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 Sri J.P. Joshi, learned Chief Standing Counsel for the State/respondent Nos. 2 to 5 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, ACJ Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Heard Sri Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Ajay Veer Pundir, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2, Sri J.P. Joshi, learned Chief Standing Counsel for the State/respondent Nos. 2 to 5 on the delay condonation application and perused the affidavit filed in support thereto. 2. We find sufficient ground to condone the delay in filing the appeal. 3. Accordingly, the delay condonation application is allowed. The delay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. 4. By way of this appeal, the appellant has challenged the order dated 29.06.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No. 666 (M/S) of 2009, Committee of Management Raja Mahendra Pratap Prem Vidhiyalaya Vs State of Uttarakhand & others. 5. Learned Single Judge vide impugned order has granted last opportunity of three weeks time to file the counter 2 affidavit to the State Counsel and at the same time learned Single Judge has stayed the order of single operation dated 23.10.2008. 6. In case, against the interim order passed by the learned Single Judge in the writ petition the appellant has any grievance; he may move the stay vacation application before the Court concerned and place his arguments. 7. However, at this staged, we do not find any justification to interfere in the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge. 8. Accordingly, the special appeal is dismissed. (B.S. Verma, J.) (B.C. Kandpal, ACJ) 11.09.2009 ASWAL