1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 4672 of 2011 Shakeel Ahmad Hafiz Sirajuddin. Vs. Central Information Commissioner, and others. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. D.C. Chahande, Adv. for the petitioner. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK J. DATE : 18 th November, 2011. Heard. It is the case of the petitioner that the relevant information sought by the petitioner under the Right to Information Act was not supplied to him. However, on a perusal of the application and the information supplied by the information officer, it is clear that the Information Officer had supplied the information as sought by the petitioner. The Central Information Commissioner rightly dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner by the impugned order dated 18.3.2011 as it was of the view that the information was duly supplied to the petitioner and merely because the information was not beneficial to the petitioner, it could not be said that the Information Officer had not duly supplied the information sought by the petitioner. As there is no merit in the writ petition, the same is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE Hirekhan.