1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5686 OF 2010 (Dilip Vinayak Bende & Ors. vs. Anandrao Gangaram Barai & Ors.) with WRIT PETITION NO. 5688 OF 2010 (Ajabrao Khushalrao Musale & Anr. vs. Anandrao Gangaram Barai & Ors.) with WRIT PETITION NO. 5689 OF 2010 (Manohar Tulsiram Dahake vs. Anandrao Gangaram Barai & Ors.) with WRIT PETITION NO. 5690 OF 2010 (Gunwant Nagorao Kohale vs. Anandrao Gangaram Barai & Ors.) with Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. NOVEMBER 24, 2010. Heard Shri Choube, learned counsel for the petitioners. In the suit filed in the year 2000, the petitioners – defendants moved application for amendment on 14.12.2009 contending that on 09.10.2009 he got knowledge from the Ex- President of the Society and one Member that in lieu of 0.69 Acre of land, two plots i.e. plots bearing No. 12 and 23 and some other land was allotted to the plaintiffs. That application has been rejected by the trial Court after noticing that it was moved after the matter was posted for argument and judgment. Both the parties had filed written notes of arguments. With the assistance of learned counsel, I have perused the impugned order. The suit no doubt is filed prior to amendment of Order 6, Rule 17 of Civil 2 Procedure Code but then the trial Court has looked into all relevant consideration and exercised its discretion. I am not inclined to interfere in the matter in this jurisdiction. Writ Petition is, therefore, rejected with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the impugned order if occasion therefor arises after the suit is finally decided. JUDGE *GS.