IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.8 of 2006 (M/B) Shankar s/o Shri Pardeshi, Village Puranpur, Post Officer Naugawan Thaggu, Tehsil Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar, Uttaranchal …………. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Collector/District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar, Uttaranchal 2. Tehsildar Khatima, Udham Singh Nagar, Uttaranchal 3. The Uttar Pradesh Sahkari Gram Vikash Bank Ltd. Through its Branch Manager, Khatima Branch, Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar, Uttaranchal. ………. Respondents Petitioner’s counsel absent. Sri N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no.3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner’s counsel absent. Sri N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no.3. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. Consequently, the interim order dated 12.01.2006 stands vacated automatically. 5. With the above order, dated, CLMA Nos.46 of 2006 and 47 of 2006 also stands disposed of. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 05.07.2006 05.07.2006 A