WP(C) 2660/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Mr. Khan, learned Counsel for the petitioner, on a perusal of th e order dated 12/8/2010 of the Director of Elementary Education, Assam, reinstat ing him (petitioner) in his original place of posting submits that the impositio n of penalty of dropping of one annual increment is not sustainable in law. As the challenge laid in the instant proceeding relates to the p etitioner’s suspension vide the order dated 7/7/2009 (Annexure 4 to the writ pet ition) this Court is not inclined to examine this aspect of his grievance herein . The petitioner is left at liberty to challenge the imposition of penalty in a separate proceeding as contemplated in law. This petition is thus closed in the above terms. A copy of the order dated 12/8/2010 would form a part of the record s. Mr. Goswami, learned Standing counsel, Education Department, is present.