IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 21ST MAY 2009 / 31ST VAISAKHA 1931 WP(C).No. 10702 of 2009(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- VELLANGOTTU KORACHAN, VELLANGOTTU HOUSE, MANNATHI POYIL P.O., ARAKKAMPOYIL, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.SAJU.S.A RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM. CIVIL STATION, MALAPPURAM. 2. R.D.O. PERINTHALMANNA, OFFICE OF R.D.O., PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM. 3. THE SECRETARY, KARULAYI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KARULAYI, NILAMBUR. 4. INDIA TELECOM INFRSTRUCTURAL LTD., KAKKANAD, KOCHI. BY GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ....................... W.P.(C).10702/2009 ....................... Dated this the 21st day of May, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner, a resident of Arakkampoyil in Karulai Grama panchayat, submits that the residents in the locality are aggrieved by the construction of a mobile tower in the residential area. They have brought this to the notice of the second respondent vide Ext.P2. They seek a direction to the second respondent to look into Ext.P2 and to take appropriate action thereon. I heard learned Government Pleader also. In the circumstances, writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to look into Ext.P2 and take appropriate action thereon, after conducting an enquiry, in accordance with law. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs