XI-HC-22 "rq -ilWM'4, Bfll'y'is, faoi'Hy snit^T'iRra? *<I*<CTI aiiich""" """""""""'"^ 2<l® •ftre^T"""""""""" sn^r^iT R'li.'b sniSw ?ti^l<ft ^l[stT ^Ffl^T sKir^R yfsff St'ngle Bench; Hon'ble M W.P. rsi (Petition U/A 226 |f Constitution of India) Petitioners q'^[<n'tlll *1HflT'^ fe^ ^fat^.l< '^'^T^FTSn^T ^Justice bhirendra Mishra) No.7017/08 1. LaxtTJari Singh S/o Shpi Ankaluram Halb{i, aged about 38 years, Disg. Sanghien. P.W.b. 5ub Division No.l, Baloijl, r/p Villdge- burgitola, P.0 Rengfadabri, Tehsil Dondilohara, District Durg|(C6) 2. Soktjl Ram; S/o Kali Ram Halba, aged abou|t' 41 yedrs, t>tsg. Sangman, P.W.D. Sub |C)iviSi6n No.l, Bdlod, r/o Village- t)UFg|itolo, P.0 Rengadabri, Tehsil Doncjilohara, District Durg (C6) 3. Ankc|lu Ram, S/o Shri Birjhu Ram Halba, agecfl about 41 years, bisg. Sangman, P.W.|3. Sub Division No.l, Balod, r/o Villa^e- Durgitola, P.0 Rengadabri, Teh^il bondilohara, District Durg (C6) 4. Ramlt>han Lal, S/o Shri Klavilash Sinha, agedj about 55 years, Disg. Gangman, P.W.O. Sub bivision No.l, Balod, r/o Villafee- Durgitola, P.0 Rengadabri, Teh^il Dondilohara, bistrict burg (C6) 5. Oau4-Ram, S/o Ram Prasad Kenwat, aged aboi(t 55 years, Disg. Gdngman, P.W.t). Sub|bivision No.l, Balod, r/o Vitiage- Dur^itola, P.0 Rengadabri, Tehsil Dontfilohara, District Durg (C6) - . 6: Sanlju Ram, S/o Shri Laxman Halba,*aged aboijt 38 years, Disg. (Sangmah, P.W.D. Sub| bivision No.l, Bo.\od,r/o Village- ^ XI-HC-22 T°? 'tlllldl, an1<H<is, iq<lii«i< ^n^r IR^? •<1*1<11 g)i|jq,-"————————•——•'g^ 200 "iw^r an^CT^r (<•<['* 3D^?F sti+ii'o yfefl i- 311^1 gWIW^lfw z.- Vs Respondents Present: » . Mr: Satyendra Sdhu, Advocate for Mr. P. Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer fo 17.12.2008 \Heard. The petitioners have filed the respondents to regularize thei| on regular pay scale by complyir|g CM<iI<li<ni *ii*^if^ f^t<ii <P*i^i< ^? aiBgii aii^i Kairl^itta, P.0 ftengadabri, Tehsil Dondflohara, bistr-ict burg (C6) 7. Hari |Ram, S/o Shri Mehter Ram Halba, aged| about 38 years, Disg. Sangman, P.W.I|>. Sub Division No.l, Balod, r/o Villa^e-Kair'katta, P.0 Rengadabri, Tehsil Doncflohara, District Durg (C6) 1. The Sj^dte of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secre^ary, Department of Public Works, Mantr-^lay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) 2, Engine^r-in-Chief, Public Works bepar'l'ment, Civil LIne, Raipur (C.6.) 3. Superi|ntending Engineer, Public Works Depar'l'ment, Durg Circle, Durg (C6) 4. The (xecutive Engineer, Public Works bepartment, Balod Division, District Durg (C6) hepetitioners. the State. he instant petition for a dipjection to services in theregular establishment with the orders of the Tndustrial f XI-HC-22 sn^[q;[ [<;-fi<ti SV^S »i+iicft.-ylia [i- 'S^ -^IWId^, 9fl1+i*i<o, facii^y an^?i 'tra^ *<11CTI g,^jq,—•——•——————•——-^F^ 200 ""ft^a' 3T1^T ?«ii<a<-yf?a ^ tribiinal Dor Tribunal of Ahnexure P-1 <& P-2 P-3 <& P-4. LeQrned counsel for the peti this petition at this stage, how| representafion before the respond raised in this petition and the same^ within th? specified period in th^ Government dnd orders of the Learned counsel appearing objection if the petition is disposecf In view of the above submisdi the instant petitidn is disposed of detailed representation before th| grievances raised in this pel'iti^oh representation being made, the r| same in accordance with law on itt within a period of three'monthj representation. Certified copy as per rules. anjl in light of the circulars of Annexure ^ioners submits that he is not pressing ^ver, he prays for liberty to make ^nt concerned raising all the grievances may be decided in accordance with law light of the circulars of the State <t>i<ll<'l<ilt 'RTR^f ^ fs1^ <Pq<^l< ^T apin aii^r the State submits that he has no of in the aforesaid terms. jions of learned counsel for the parties, ^vith liberty to the petitioners to make ^respondent concerned raising all the with copy of tHis or'der and on such ^spondent concerned shall decide the ^'own merits expeditiously, preferably ^' from the date of receipt of the SdA -:-, DhirendraMishra Judge I- ?7 R