IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10203 of 2011-A. Decided on: 2nd December, 2011. Fafan Devi. … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. P.C. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG, for respondents No.1 to 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is essentially aggrieved by the selection and appointment of the private respondent as Anganwari worker. According to the petitioner, the private respondent’s income is far above the prescribed income limit. Pursuant to the direction issued by this Court, it is seen that the Tehsildar, Hamirpur has made an assessment of the income of the private respondent, which is reported to Rs.7800/-. If that be so, the private respondent was eligible and entitled for appointment as Anganwari worker under the third respondent. We find that this crucial and relevant aspect of the matter has been considered by the Deputy Commissioner. We do not find any legal infirmity in the stand taken by the Deputy Commissioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 2nd December, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr/kck) Judge.