:1: :1: :1: HIGH HIGH HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2091 OF 2006. PETITION NO. 2091 OF 2006. PETITION NO. 2091 OF 2006. Mr. Ram Jagtiani and others. ..Petitioners. Versus. The Administrator, Bombay Market Apartment CHS Ltd. and others..Respondents. --- Smt. Nisha Valani for the Petitioners. Shri. Arun H. Palekar, AGP for the respondents- State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.B.MHASE, J. S.B.MHASE, J. S.B.MHASE, J. DATE DATE DATE : MARCH 27, 2006. : MARCH 27, 2006. : MARCH 27, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. Order passed under section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 is under challenge directly. However, as against the said order revision under section 154 of the said Act is permissible. There is statement made in the petition that the revision was filed. However, in view of the provision made in the said section to deposit 50% of the amount of the certificate that was not entertained. The deposit of 50% amount of the certificate is a legislative provision. Now the learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement that the petitioner will deposit the said amount. It is made clear that if the revision petition is filed, on deposit of 50% of amount of the certificate, the respondent - Registrar shall accept and consider the same. With these observations petition is disposed of. (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, J.) J.) J.)