IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8181 of 2009 1. SATTAR ANSARI 2. Nuraisha Khatoon Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 23.06.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law. They have been alleged for killing the deceased for demand of dowry and throwing the dead body on the Railway track. In such circumstances, submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that though differences were prevailing earlier for the burn injuries to the deceased in parents’ house for her treatment, husband provided Rs. 40,000/- and deceased was allowed to come to in-laws’ family where again allegations are made about demand, torture and cruelty. While the Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that it was a simple case of accident as deceased left in-laws’ house due to not allowing her to go to her parents house and in that course, she met the accident which is supported by witnesses of the locality where the incident took place as recorded in paragraph nos. 16, 17 and 18 and all injuries have been found ante- mortem which is possible by crossing of Railway Train. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Bhabhua (Sonhan) P.S. Case No. 321 2 of 2008, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Kaimur at Bhabhua subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)