:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 860 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO. 860 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO. 860 OF 2009 Bhagwan Balkrishna Banger ..Petitioner versus M/s. Liberty Oil Mills Ltd. & ..Respondents Mr. Y. M. Pendse for the Petitioner. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. DATE : 29TH JANUARY, 2009. DATE : 29TH JANUARY, 2009. DATE : 29TH JANUARY, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner has challenged the Order of the Industrial Court dated 10.3.2008. 3. By the impugned order, the Industrial Court has reversed the Order of the Labour Court granting interim relief to the petitioner. The petitioner was terminated from service interalia on the ground of absence without leave by the respondent. He has challenged his termination in Complaint under Schedule IV item 1 of the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. According to the petitioner his leave was justified :2: since he had met with an accident. Having regard to this fact, the Labour Court granted the petitioner an uncommon interim relief of reinstatement. 4. The respondent challenged the interim order before the Industrial Court in Revision. The Industrial Court has on the application of settled principles reversed the Order of the Labour Court. 5. The Industrial Court is right in observing that the Labour Court has granted final relief to the petitioner, which was not necessary because if the petitioner is found to have been terminated illegally, he would be entitled to full relief including backwages. There is no reason to interfere with this Order which does not suffer from any error of law apparent on the face of the record. The petition is dismissed. The Complaint may be decided as expeditiously as possible. (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.)