HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO. 308 OF 2004 Between: A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Society and one another ………….Appellants AND V. Seshacharyulu and thirteen others ………….Respondents JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This Appeal is directed against the order dated 16.10.2003 rendered by the learned Single Judge in Review WPMP No. 30918 of 2002 in W.P.No. 20455 of 1999 instituted by the appellant herein. When the matter is taken up for disposal, it is submitted that the subject matter of this Writ Appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in M. BHASHINI A. VS. M.D., A.P. WOMEN’S CO-OP FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED[1], wherein the Supreme Court at paragraph 43 observed as under: “43. In the result, the appeals filed by the employees (C.A. Nos.3702, 3703, 3704, 3705, 3706, 3707, 3709, 3710, 3721, 3733, 3734, 3737, 3742, 3744, 3748, 3749 and 3751 of 2006) are dismissed and those filed by the State Government and agencies/instrumentalities of the State (C.A. Nos.3685, 3712, 3713, 3714, 3715, 3716, 3717, 3718, 3723, 3724, 3726, 3727, 3728, 3729, 3730, 3731, 3732, 3750, 3752,3753, 3754 and 3755 of 2006) are allowed. The declaration made by the Division Bench that the ban on regularisation will be effective from 19.8.1998 i.e. the date on which Act No.27 of 1998 came into force and that all persons who have completed 5 years service as on that date would be entitled to be considered for regularisation of service is set aside. It is, however, made clear that the daily wage employees and others who are covered by Section 7 of the 1994 Act (amended) and whose services have not been regularised so far, shall be entitled to be considered for regularisation and their services shall be regularised subject to fulfillment of the conditions enumerated in G.O. dated 22.4.1994. With a view to obviate further litigation on this issue, we direct the Government of Andhra Pradesh, its officers and agencies/instrumentalities of the State to complete the exercise for regularisation of the services of eligible employees within four months of the receipt/production of copy of this order, without being influenced by the fact that the application, writ petition or appeal filed by any such employee may have been dismissed by the Tribunal or High Court or this Court. Since some of the appeals decided by this order relate to part time employees, we direct that similar exercise be undertaken in their cases and completed within four months keeping in view the conditions enumerated in G.O.(P). No.112 dated 23.7.1997.” Following the above judgment of the Supreme Court, this Writ Appeal is also allowed subject to the same terms and conditions, which contained therein. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J ________________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J DATE: 07.12.2011 KA ... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. 2 CD copies. [1] 2009 (4) LLJ 57 (SC)