IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 10TH JULY 2008 / 19TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 20843 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- S.JAYAKUMAR , S/O,SADANANDAN, MANIPUZHA VEETTIL, KOMALAPURAM VILLAGE AMBALAPPUZHA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SARIN SRI.M.R.SASITH RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY K.S.E BOARD VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER K.S.E.B OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER ELECTRICAL SECTION, KATTANAM, MAVELIKARA. 3. THE SUB ENGINEER ELECTRICAL SECTION, KATTANAM , MAVELIKKARA. BY SC SRI. P.P. THAJUDEEN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No. 20843 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 10th day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT The only prayer pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the objection, Ext.P5, filed by the petitioner against Ext.P4 may be directed to be considered by the second respondent. 2. Learned Standing Counsel does not dispute the fact that Ext.P4 is a notice accompanied by the provisional bill issued under Section 126 of the Electricity Act. In such circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of as follows: There will be a direction to the second respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P5 in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such time as a decision is taken, there will be no disconnection pursuant to Ext.P4. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb