IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8443 of 2010 1. NAWAL KISHORE PANDEY S/O LATE BISHU DUTT PANDEY R/O VILL.- MANIKA, P.S. MADANPUR, DISTT.- AURANGABAD. 2. ARUN KUMAR CHAUDHARY S/O SRI AMRIT CHAUDHARY R/O JAY PRAKASH NAGAR, P.S. AND DISTT.- AURANGABAD …………… PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE SECRETARY BOARD OF REVENUE, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER MAGADH DIVISION, GAYA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, AURANGABAD …….RESPONDENTS ----------- 3. 17/03/2011 Petitioner has filed this writ application for a direction to the respondents to consider their cases for appointment against vacant sanctioned posts of Class IV under Aurangabad Collectorate. Learned counsel for the petitioners relies upon two orders of this Court dated 12.10.2009 and 29.1.2010, copies whereof are annexed as Annexures-5 and 5/A. From these orders it appears that an advertisement had been published in the district of Aurangabad in December, 2009 inviting applications for regular appointment on Class IV posts. Petitioners claim that they have been working on daily wages with the respondents since long and they have already applied against the said advertisement. In the circumstances, in natural course, 2 cases of the petitioners have to be considered by the respondents in accordance with law. The writ application is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondents that if the petitioners have applied against December, 2009 advertisement, their cases should be considered for regular appointment in accordance with law. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)