IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10833 of 2011 1. RAKESH KUMAR SINGH @ RAKESH KUMAR 2. RAVI KUMAR SINGH. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. PUNAM RAI. ----------- 2 25.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner no.1 being elder brother of the husband and petitioner no.2 being husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 406 and 313 of the Indian Penal Code. Though, there is accusation of demand of dowry and torture, but it is submitted that the marriage was performed in the year 2003. The restitution case was filed on 29.10.2009 when the present complaint was filed on 30.04.2010. The husband is still ready to keep the informant as wife with full dignity and honour. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner no.1, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned 2 Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Hathua P.S. Case No. 20/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Let the petitioner no.2 be released on provisional anticipatory bail for six months, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Hathua P.S. Case No. 20/10, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Let the learned court below issue notice to the informant when the petitioner no.2 will take the informant back to her matrimonial house to keep her as wife with full dignity and honour. 3 The provisional anticipatory bail of the petitioner no.2 will be confirmed in two eventualities (i) if the matrimonial harmony is substantially restored or (ii) if the informant deliberately refuses to reside with the petitioner no.2. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)