IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38262 of 2009 RAJESH SAH & ORS . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 01-12-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission in a police case under sections 384, 386 and 427 of the Penal Code instituted on 24.03.2009 is of false implication because of a complaint case alleged to have been filed on 20.03.2009 against the informant and others in a land dispute. The allegations are of throwing bombs and signs of bomb explosion at the place of occurrence. The application states nothing of the antecedents of the petitioners and the impugned order of rejection notices nothing from the case diary with regard to the place of occurrence. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, namely, Rajesh Sah, Mukul Sah and Santosh Kumar, surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail provisionally, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in Ahiyapur, P.S. Case No. 88 of 2009, G.R. No. 823 of 2009, for a fixed period when report with regard - 2 - to their antecedents shall be called for. The court below shall simultaneously examine from the case diary whether the place of occurrence contains signs of explosion of bombs. If the petitioners have no antecedent and the case diary records no material of explosion of bomb at the place of occurrence, the court below shall proceed to confirm their provisional anticipatory bail. In the event of negative report with regard to either of two issues, the provisional anticipatory bail shall not be confirmed. The petitioners are required to be physically present on each date till the final acceptance of their bail bonds so that in the event the provisional anticipatory bail is not confirmed, they shall surrender on the same day and have to seek regular bail. ( Navin Sinha, J ) BTiwary/