IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 47 of 1985 with CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 48 of 1985 Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- M/S THAKKAR DEVCHAND KUBERDAS & BROS Versus RANA VASANTLAL RANCHHODLAL -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MC SHAH for Petitioners MR KC SHAH for Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 11/02/2000 COMMON ORAL JUDGEMENT Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the disputes between the parties have been settled outside court, but written instructions are awaited. This, however, is not sufficient reason for adjourning the present matters which are on a specially fixed board today Friday, the 11th February 2000 as directed by the Hon'ble Chief Justice. These revisions are accordingly disposed of and rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Liberty to apply in case of difficulty. ********