IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 2840 of 1986 DATE OF DECISION : 07.09.2010 Surta Singh (Dead) through LRs .... PETITIONER Versus The Additional Director, Consolidation of Holdings, Punjab, Chandigarh and another ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amarjit Markan, Advocate, for respondent No.2. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. On August 13, 2010, on request made by leaned counsel for the petitioner, the matter was adjourned for today and the petitioner was directed to come present in the Court for amicable settlement. In this petition, the petitioner as well as respondent No.2 have expired and their legal representatives are present in the Court. In this petition, petitioner Surta Singh has challenged the order dated 25.4.1986 (Annexure P-1), passed by the Additional Director, Consolidation of Holdings, Punjab, Chandigarh, in exercise of his powers under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948. By the said order, on the petition CWP No. 2840 of 1986 -2- filed by respondent No.2 Bakhtawar Singh, the share of petitioner Surta Singh to the extent of 9/24th in land adjoining Mehal Chah was deleted and it was held that Surta Singh shall have a right in the Mehal Chah as a co- sharer and he will enjoy the same as such. It was further held that petitioner Surta Singh will continue to have access to the Mehal Chah from this land as before uninterruped and undisputedly. During the course of arguments, both the parties have agreed that let the order dated 25.4.1986 (Annexure P-1), passed by the Additional Director, Consolidation of Holdings, Punjab, Chandigarh, be upheld subject to the condition that legal representatives of petitioner Surta Singh can approach this Mehal Chah from two sides i.e. from Pahi bearing No. 419/1 and adjoining to Khasra No. 22//3/2 as well as from passage No. 419, which is situated opposite the said `Pahi', but without tractor and cart. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. September 07, 2010 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE