IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 205 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 318 OF 2004 DR.MARIANO GODINHO,MAJORDA-GOA. ....Applicants Versus SMT. CARMELINA DIAS AND 2 ORS., ....Respondents Shri A. F. Diniz, Advocate for the applicant. Shri C. A. Coutinho, Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri A. D. Bhobe, Advocate for respondent No.2. Shri S. R. Rivonkar, Govt. Advocate for respondent No.3. Coram:- S.S. PARKAR, J. Date:- 13th July, 2005 P.C. Respondent No.1, through his Advocate undertakes that he shall not carry out any construction work of any nature extending the house nor shall undertake construction of the compound wall during the pendency of this writ petition. The said undertaking is accepted. In view of the said undertaking, the learned Advocate for the applicant does not press prayer clause (a) of the application. The hearing of the writ petition is expedited. The Civil Application shall stand disposed of accordingly. S.S. PARKAR, J.