FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9557 OF 2010 “Sandipan Gnyanoba Somwanshi Vs. State of Maharashtra and others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. M.K. Deshpande,Advocate for the petitioner Mr. U.S. Mote, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. K.G. Patil, AGP for respondent No.1. Mr. A.V. Patil, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE :- 7th December, 2010. PER COURT :- 1] The petitioner, by way of present petition, challenges the allotment of tenament under the 2% discretionary quota of the Honourable Chief Minister in the scheme of the Aurangabad Area Housing Development Authority. 2] It is the contention of the petitioner that though initially the petitioner was alloted the said tenament, the petitioner did not receive the communication. It is further submitted that the respondent No.3, though applied for the said tenament, the same to be allotted in favour of the respondent No. 3. 3] We are not inclined to pass any order disturbing the allotment in favour of the respondent No.3. However, the FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9557 OF 2010 “Sandipan Gnyanoba Somwanshi Vs. State of Maharashtra and others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 petitioner would be at liberty to make an application to the Honourable Chief Minister for allotment of another tenament in the scheme of the Housing Board. If such an application is made by the petitioner, the Honourable Chief Minister would consider the same in accordance with law. . With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. [R.M. BORDE, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-