MWL, S‘NGLE BENCH 1/ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (c.G) w.P.(S)No. H4éL OF 2011 PETlTlONER Kunwar Lal Sinha, aged about 52 years, S/o Hatoi Lal Sinha, Head Master, Government Primary School Paragaonkala, Dongergarh, Block Dongergarh, DisttV Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS ESPONDENTS :1. State of Chhattisgarh through. R Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.Sv Bhawan, Raipur (C-G-l Director, Public Instructions, Raipur (CVG.) The Collector, Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Dongergarh, Distt.’ Rajnandgaon (co) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA (7)\ HIGH COURT OF CHHA’ITISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 4762 of 2011 PETITIONER : Kunwar Lal Sinha. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri K.S.Pawar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 19 day of August, 201 1) §Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, working as Assistant Teacher, was promoted as Head Master, vide order dated 04.03.2011 (Annexure P/2) and posted at Government Primary School, Paragaonkalai Therealter, by impugled order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P/l), the petitioner has been transferred to Primary School, Bhursatola, Dongargarh, on administrative grounds. Shri Pawar further submits that clause 4 of the circular dated 21.06.2011 (Annexure P/5), issued by the State Government, prescribes that the newly appointed/promoted Head Master and Principal: should not be transferred in any case before completion of one year. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents does not controvert the submission made by leamed counsel for the petitioner and submits that there is a complete ban on transfer of the newly promoted/appointed Head Master and Principal before completion of a period of one year. 3. In View of the above, the impug1ed order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P/ 1) in respect ofthe petitioner is quashed. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. No order asto costs. Sd/— SATISH K. ANGNIHORI Judge