BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Eighteenth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.14977 of 2011 1 ANNADURAI 2 VELLAISAMY ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 2 & 3 Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MELAVALAVOO POLICE STATION, MELUR, MADURAI DT. (CRIME NO.145 OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.MP.AMALAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 323, 506(i) and 379 (NP) of IPC and read with 4 of Woman Harassment Act in Crime No.145 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police. They have approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Heard Mr.S.MP.Amalan, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they did not committed any crime as stated in the complaint. He would submit that they have been falsely implicated in this case. He would also submit that they are also having permanent residence and therefore, he would request for the grant of anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the petitioners had looted 45 sovereigns of gold chain. He would further submit that the investigation is pending and suitable conditions may be passed in the event of grant anticipatory bail. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this Case and the petitioner have no previous cases this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to all the petitioners, of course, subject to certain stringent conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the Judicial Magistrate concerned on executing separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders for the purpose of interrogation. 7. The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 18/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MELUR 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MELAVALAVOO POLICE STATION, MELUR, MADURAI DT +1. CC to M/S. S.MP.AMALAN Advocate SR.No.40703 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14977 of 2011 Date :18/11/2011 SMA/22.11.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/