BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16408 of 2011 1. DHANALAKSHMI 2. NATARAJAN : PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1&2 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, IDAYAKOTTAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. (CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2011) : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.KARTHIC RAJAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr. K.S.DURAIPANDIAN Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as A1 and A2 and they apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 341, 427, 430 and 506(i) I.P.C and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Heard Mr.R.Karthic Rajan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that there is a civil dispute in between the petitioners and the de-facto complainant. He would further submit that the investigation is offing and the plea of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail may not be considered. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I could see that there is a civil dispute in between the petitioners and the de- facto complainant, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners on condition that the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.2,500/- (Rupees Two Thousand Five hundred only) in fixed deposit in their names respectively, in a nationalised bank for a period of one year initially to be renewed thereafter till the disposal of the case and the petitioners shall produce the same before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul for being kept in safe custody, after entering the same in FD Register and on receipt of the same, the petitioners are entitled to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. The said amount shall not be released without the order of this Court. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. Sd/- 15/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, IDAYAKOTTAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. R.KARTHIC RAJAN Advocate SR.No.43790 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16408 of 2011 NSV/21.12.11/2P/6C Date :15/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/