IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH MAY 2007 / 9TH JYAISHTA 1929 WA.No. 990 of 2007() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.27219/2000 Dated 21/11/2006 .................... APPELLANTS: PETITIONERS --------------------------------------- 1. CENTRE FOR WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT (CWRDM), EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, REPRESENTED BY K.R.PRASANNAKUMAR, WORKING PRESIDENT, KUNNAMANGALAM, KOZHIKODE-673 571. 2. K.R.PRASANNAKUMAR, TECHNICAL OFFICER (GRADE II), CENTRE FOR WATER RESOURCES MUSEUM, CWRDM, KUNNAMANGALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE-673 571. 3. SREEVALLABHAN S., TECHNICAL OFFICER (GRADE-II), GROUND WATER DIVISION, CWRDM, KUNNAMANGALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE-673 571. 4. M.K.RADHAKRISHNAN, TECHNICAL ASSISTANT (GRADE IV), GROUND WATER DIVISION, CWRDM, KUNNAMANGALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE-673 571. 5. C.K.GOPINATHAN, TECHNICAL ASSISTANT (GRADE III), MOS UNIT, CWRDM, KUNNAMANGALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE-673 571. BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. WA 990/2007 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CENTRE FOR WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT, KUNNAMANGALAM, KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. 4. COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH, (CSIR), REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, CSIR HEAD QUARTERS, ANUSANDHAN BHAVAN, RAFI MARG, NEW DELHI. BY ADV. SRI.D.SOMASUNDARAM FOR R3 AND R4 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SANDESH RAJA THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/05/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANTONY DOMINIC, JJ. =============================== W.A. NO. 990 OF 2007 ====================== Dated this the 30th day of May, 2007 J U D G M E N T Radhakrishnan, J. Contentions urged in the Writ Appeal are not seen raised before the learned Single Judge. Appellants/Petitioners sought permission to file a review petition before the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, this writ appeal is disposed of with liberty to the appellants to file a review petition before the learned Single Judge. K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp