IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2010 / 13TH JYAISTHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 595 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN W.P. --------------------------------- BOBBY JOSEPH, S/O JOSEPH, AGED 35 YEARS, AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY TATA TELE SERVICES LTD., HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT TOWER 1, 10TH FLOOR, JEEVAN BHARATI, 124 CANNAUGHT CIRCUS, NEW DELHI AND LOCAL OFFICE AT SL PLAZA, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI. BY ADV. SRI.A.MOHAMED MUSTAQUE RESPONDENT(S): 1ST RESPONDENT IN WP ----------------------------------- SRI.RAJESH.V., FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED 40 YEARS, ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL SECTION, EATTUMANOOR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. SC SRI. K.S. ANIL THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- CO.C. NO.595 OF 2010 (S) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T Non-compliance of Annexure-A3 judgment in WP(c). No.19305/09 is alleged in this writ petition. Petitioner was served an invoice demanding Rs.2,92,109/-. That was challenged before this court relying on Ext.P5 classificatory order issued by the Board. Taking note of Ext.P5, this court by Annexure-A3 judgment directing the Board to reconsider the matter. Accordingly the Board reconsidered the matter and issued Annexure-A2 invoice demanding Rs.14,6,000/-. Petitioner's contention is that since the basis of quantification is not disclosed in Annexure-A2, there is non-compliance of the direction of this court in Annexure-A3 judgment of this court. 2. In Annexure A3 what was directed by this court is that the matter shall be reconsidered. Accordingly Ext.P5 invoice was set aside and as is the usual practice, the Board has issued a revised invoice. I am not satisfied that any willful disobediance warranting proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act has been made out. Still I feel that the petitioner is entitled to know the basis of COC.No.595 /2010 :2 : quantification in Annexure-A2.Therefore it is ordered that the basis on which the amount has been quantified as per Annexure-A2 shall be intimated to the petitioner within 2 weeks from today. Contempt is closed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/