IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC(T) No. 105 of 2008. Decided on: 5th October, 2010. Rajinder Bindra. …Petitioner. -Versus- Shri P.C. Kapoor and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, Advocate vice Mr. Madan Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents. : None. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): It has come in the reply that the representation has been decided by the competent authority on 9th May, 2008 (Annexure R/2). 2. Consequently, the petition is rendered infructuous. Disposed of as infructuous. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to assail the order dated 9th May, 2008 (Annexure R/2) before the appropriate Forum. The limitation will not come in the way of the petitioner. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge October 05, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?