IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.7128 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 6.12.2010 Balbir Singh ....Petitioner Versus Surinder Singh and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Ajit Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. C.M.Nos.27665 and 31069-CII of 2010 Allowed as prayed for. C.R.No.7128 of 2010 There is no legal infirmity in the impugned order. The zimni orders reveal that the petitioner has been extremely callous in prosecuting his case. Number of opportunities had been given to the petitioner to lead his evidence in rebuttal which he failed to avail of. Thereafter he moved this application for leading additional evidence which has now been declined. In view of the fact that the petitioner has been given sufficient opportunities which he did not avail of, there is no justifiable reason to grant the prayer which has been made in the petition. The trial Court was thus right in appreciating the facts in right perspective. In the absence of any jurisdictional error no C.R.No.7128 of 2010 (O&M) -2- interference is warranted. Dismissed. 6.12.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss