Civil Revision No.4747 of 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4747 of 2008 Date of decision: September 04, 2008 Gurbax Singh …..Petitioner Versus Hans Raj …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE T.P.S.MANN PRESENT: Mr Rajeshwar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. T.P.S.MANN, J. Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell dated 20.2.1996 filed by Hans Raj-respondent against the petitioner was decreed on 13.8.2001. During the execution proceedings, the petitioner filed an application for impleading Ashok Kumar and Vinod Kumari, for the reason that they had also obtained an ejectment order dated 18.9.2001 passed by learned Rent Controller, Hoshiarpur and under the said order, he was required to hand-over the vacant possession of the suit property to said Ashok Kumar and Vinod Kumari. The execution of the civil Court decree was a matter between Hans Raj-decree holder and the petitioner, who is a judgment debtor thereunder. The execution of the decree could not be opposed or resisted on the ground that some other persons were also having interest in the suit property and therefore, they be impleaded. Those persons have not filed any application to implead them as party in the execution of the civil Court decree. It appears that the judgment debtor i.e. the Civil Revision No.4747 of 2008 -2- petitioner is intentionally trying to avoid execution of the decree. In view of the above, no illegality or infirmity could be found with the impugned order passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Hoshiarpur on 12.8.2008, whereby the application filed by the judgement debtor for impleading Ashok Kumar and Vinod Kumari in the execution proceedings was dismissed. The revision is without any merit and is, accordingly, dismissed. September 04, 2008 (T.P.S.MANN) Pds. JUDGE