IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 26105 of 2011 Munni Lal Paswan @ Muniya Paswan, S/o Ras Lal Paswan. Versus The State of Bihar ------------- 03. 22.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 412 IPC was added. The petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and subsequently he was arrested when his complicity was traced to one of the looted mobile phones which was subsequently recovered from under the bed of the petitioner and identified in the test identification parade. Considering the nature of allegations and his antecedents, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge if his case is not bifurcated for purposes of commitment or charge. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)