1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Revision Application No.101/2010 [Haricharan Sitaram Soni .vrs. State of Maharashtra] ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : R.G. KETKAR, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 30, 2010. Heard Mr. V.D. Kinge, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. D.M. Kale, learned APP for the non- applicant/State. This matter was listed for orders as the applicant did not surrender to the police after he was convicted by the learned Sessions Court. Mr. Kale, learned APP has submitted report dated 30.9.2010 of Tahsil Police Station, wherein it has been set out that the applicant was arrested at 6.30 p.m. on 28.9.2010 and he was produced before the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Court No.4, Nagpur City on 29.9.2010. The report further sets out that the applicant is sent to Central Prison, Nagpur City. The report dated 30.9.2010 is marked ‘X’ and is taken on record. By consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for admission. 2 Admit. Call for record and proceeding of the case. Criminal Application (APPR) No.144/2010 Heard Mr. V.D. Kinge, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. D.M. Kale, learned APP for the non- applicant/State. By this application, the prayer is made for enlarging the applicant on bail, subject to furnishing his personal bond. In paragraph nos.3 and 4 of the application, it is contended that during the course of the trial, the applicant was enlarged on personal bond and during the pendency of the appeal before the learned Sessions Judge, he was enlarged on bail by executing personal bond. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is a rickshaw-puller and has no immovable property within the local area of Nagpur. He is also unable to furnish solvent surety for his release. He, therefore, prayed that the applicant may be released on his executing personal bond. The learned APP for the non-applicant submitted that the applicant may be directed to attend the Court at the time of final hearing of the matter. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and having further due regard to the fact that the applicant was released on his 3 executing personal bond, I am of the opinion that interest of justice would be served by releasing the applicant on bail on his executing personal bond. Hence the order. ORDER The applicant is enlarged subject to his executing personal bond as was executed in the courts below and further subject to condition that he shall attend the court when the case is listed for final hearing. The application stands disposed of. Hamdast permitted. Pursis St. No.1546/2010 Advocate S.K. Bansod has filed pursis dated 2.7.2010 stating therein that he has issued notice to the applicant asking him to make alternate arrangement as he wishes to withdraw from the case. Since Advocate V.D. Kinge represents the applicant and has also filed power, Advocate S.K. Bansod stands discharged from this case. JUDGE Gulande