IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 16974 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 9.8.2011 Manpreet Kumar @ Manna .. Petitioner v. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K. S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ... Rajesh Bindal J. In terms of the order passed by this court on 2.6.2011, the petitioner had joined investigation. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from Head Constable-Jagir Singh, submitted that during interrogation, the petitioner admitted that he had committed the theft. Part of the amount was lost by him in gambling and part of that was used in consuming liquor or in household expenses. He has no money at present. Considering the aforesaid material, which was revealed by the petitioner during investigation, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 9.8.2011 mk