1 wp-10345.11.sxw lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10345 OF 2011 Changdev Maruti Chavan & ors. : Petitioners versus Changdev Ganpat Landage & Anr. : Respondents Mr. V S Tadke for the Petitioners. CORAM : R M SAVANT, J. DATE : 09th December 2011 P.C. 1 The above Petition takes exception to the order dated 20/1/2010 passed by the learned IInd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Malshiras by which order the Application Exhibit 80 for amendment of plaint came to be rejected. The said rejection is on the ground that the said amendment was sought to be moved after the trial has began and there are no sufficient reasons mentioned in the said Application as to why the said amendment could not move earlier, as also on the ground that if the amendment is allowed to be introduced, the issue which falls within the domain of the Revenue Authority under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act would be incorporated by way of the amendment in the Suit. 2 In my view, the reasons mentioned by the trial Court are unexceptional and do not merit interdiction at the hands of this Court in its writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The above Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. [R.M.SAVANT, J]