IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22615 of 2010 SHANKAR YADAV Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SATISH KR. SINHA -------------------OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 2 21.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This Court is not a forum to realise any due. Admittedly earlier a complaint case was lodged for non-payment of Rs. 2,80,000/-. A case also was filed on behalf of the petitioner and in both the cases there was compromise. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, only on assurance of payment for which a document was also executed for that only above observation is made. Once a case is lodged, criminal liability is made out that is compromised. Refusal of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not justified. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in Katihar Complaint Case No. C.A. 93/2010, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)