IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2879 of 2005 SACHCHIDANAND PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.2888 of 2005 RAMASHISH CHOUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.2885 of 2005 AMBIKA PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.2884 of 2005 BHUVANESHWAR PRASAD SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS --------------- 3 18.12.2009 All these writ applications involve post retiral benefits. So, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Heard Shri Ram Sevak Choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Manoj Kumar Jha, learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioners in these writ applications prayed for payment of post retiral benefits together with admissible interest to them. Counter affidavits have been filed in each of the writ applications showing the details of the payments made to the petitioners and with the statements made therein that the entire retiral benefits together with admissible interest has been paid to them. No rejoinder has been filed on behalf of the 2 petitioners controverting the statements made in the counter affidavits. In that view of the matter, no purpose will be served in keeping the writ applications pending. The petitioners are given liberty to file their representations, if any, before the appropriate authorities for any pending dues, who shall consider and dispose of the same by a speaking order within six weeks on receipt of such representations from the petitioners. If some amount is found due, the same may be paid to the petitioners within the period mentioned above in accordance with law. These writ applications stand disposed of with the aforementioned directions. SKBOSE (Jyoti Saran)