IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1081 of 2007 Raj Kumar Khetan son of late Ramswaroop Khetan, Malpur, P.S. Gogri, Dist. Khagaria ---Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Amar Sinha son of late Kameshwar Prasad Sinha, r/o mohalla Fart, P.S. kotwali, Dist. Munger. --- Opp.Parties. For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mrs. Veena Rani Prasad, APP For the O.P. : Mr. Manoj Kumar Ambastha, Advocate. ----------- 04 06.07.2010 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsels for the State and opposite no.2 are present. This criminal revision application is directed against the order dated 11.07.2007, passed by learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court no.5, Khagaria, in Cr. Revision no. 36 of 2007, whereby the same has been allowed and the notice dated 02.04.2007, issued by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been set aside. It may be mentioned here that opposite parties herein had preferred the aforesaid revision application challenging the notice. Learned revisional Court found in paragraph no.5 as under:- “5. mHk; i{kksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa dks lquk rFkk rdksZ dk ,oa lafpdk dk euu fd;kA tSlk fd iqujh{k.kdrkZ dk dFku gS fd ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; ls fMdzh ua0 1162@1919 ,oa mDr HkwLokeh }kjk fodz; ds i'pkr os bl Hkw[k.M dks izkIr fd;s gSa vkSj pwafd Hkw[k.M ij dCtk iqfyl ds lkFk&lkFk vU; izfrosnu ls Hkh iqujh{k.kdrkZ ds i{k esa gS] blfy, dCtk lgh ikus ds ckn mls csn[ky djus dk gd dsoy nhokuh U;k;ky;ksa }kjk 2 gS u fd n.Mkf/kdkjh }kjk /kkjk 144 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds v/khuA iqfyl izfrosnu Hkh Li"V djrk gS fd iqujh{k.kdrkZ Hkw[k.M ij nks o"kksZ ls vf/kd ls yxkrkj dCtk cuk, gS vkSj Qly Hkh yxk, gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa /kkjk 144 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh dk;Zokgh turk njckj ds vk[; ds vk/kkj ij djuk fuf'pr rkSj ij fof/k ds izko/kkuksa ds fo:} gSA ;gkWa rd U;k;ky; dk er gS fd ,d vfrpkjh dks Hkh Hkw[k.M ls fof/k ds vuqlkj gh dCts ls gVk;k tk ldrk gS u fd vU;Fkk fLFkfr esa] tgkW Lo;a dCtk Li"V gSA blfy, n.Mkf/kdkjh dk lUrqf"Vdj.k ds vk/kkj ij /kkjk 144 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dk uksfVl djus dk vkns'k Lor% fof/k vkSj rF;ksa ds izfrdwy gks tkrk gSA iqujh{k.kdrkZ ds iqujh{k.k esa cy ik jgk gWw vkSj foi{khx.k ;fn fdlh LoRo ;k iSnkb'k }kjk viuh Hkwfe izkIr djuk pkgs rks fof/k ds vuqdwy dk;Zokgh dj ldrs gSa u fd /kkjk 144 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds v/khuA** This Court finds absolutely no infirmity in the consideration of the matter by the learned revisional Court meriting any interference. The application has no merit. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)