IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11730 of 2005 MD. ADIL HUSSAIN S/O OF MD. MOINUDDIN R/O VILL- PURANI BAZAR, WARD NO.5, PS & DISTT MADHEPURA------------------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, MADHEPURA 3. UMESH RAM S/O SUDARSHAN RAM POSTED AS CAR DRIVER OF CIVIL COURT, MUNGER 4. NAGENDER SORAIN S/O THAKUR SORAIN R/O VILL-JORGAMA, PS- MURLIGANJ, DISTT- MADHEPURA-----RESPONDENTS. ----------- For the Petitioner: Mr. P. K. Agrawal, Advocate For the State: Mr. S.K.Singh, SC-22, & Mr. Shailendra Kr.Singh AC to SC-22. ---------- 3 1.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. There is no averment or assertion in the writ application to show that the petitioner is a claimant for appointment to the post of drivers which were reserved for schedule caste and scheduled tribe candidates. Appointments have come to be made on the basis of a newspaper advertisement inviting applications from S.C. & S.T. candidates for the post of drivers in the Civil Court as it was reserved for S.C. & S.T. category only. If the petitioner does not belong to that category he has no right to challenge the appointments of respondent nos. 3 and 4 as they came to be appointed to the said posts which were specially reserved for S.C. & S.T. category, to which the petitioner does not belong. This writ application has no merit and it is dismissed RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)