BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twentieth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13403 of 2011 1 NAGARAJ 2 MEENAKSHI 3 SENTHIL @ SENTHIL KUMAR 4 SAMPATH 5 SARAVANAN 6 SELVI 7 POOCHELVI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 to 7 Vs state: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ILAYANGUDI POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DIST IN CR.NO. 229/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.KANNAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for offences under Sections 147, 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.229 of 2011, the petitioners are before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case prosecution, due to some motive, it is alleged that the petitioners had thrown acid on the de-facto complainant and also criminally intimidated. 3. During the earlier hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that acid was never thrown and the said allegation is also false. In order to verify the same, this Court directed the learned Additional Public Prosecutor to get further instruction from the Inspector of Police, Ilayankudi Police Station. 4. Today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced a letter from the Inspector of Police, Ilayankudi Police Station, where, it is stated that during investigation, it could not be found out whether what was thrown is acide or any other substance. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Having regard to the above fact I am of the view that a prima facie case has been made out for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ilayankudi, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.PC. scrupulously. sd/- 20/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ILAYANKUDI, SIVAGANGAI DIST 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SIVAGANGAI 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ILAYANGUDI POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DIST +1. CC to M/S. V.KANNAN Advocate SR.No.36387 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13403 of 2011 Date :20/10/2011 SMA/21.10.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/