IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.14343 of 2009 Between: Sri Munaga Guravarjuna Rao S/o.Ramulu Shop No.1 and 2, R/o.Main Bazar, Darsi Town, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Collector (CS Wing), Prakasam District, Ongole. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur, Prakasam District. 3 The Tahsildar, Darsi Mandal, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.GUTTAPALEM VIJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents:AGP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner questioned the purported delay on the part of respondent No.1 in disposing of his stay application. The petitioner claimed to have filed stay application along with the appeal before respondent No.1 on 15.07.2009 against order, dated 13.07.2009 passed by respondent No.2 suspending his fair price shop authorization. After waiting for one day, he filed the present writ petition complaining of non-disposal of the stay application by respondent No.1. The fact that the petitioner filed the writ petition without giving reasonable time to respondent No.1 to consider and dispose of his stay application shows his undue anxiety. Be that as it may, since the petitioner claimed to have filed stay application in the appeal filed against the order of respondent No.2, respondent No.1 is directed to dispose of the same, if filed, within a period of one (1) week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is accordingly, disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.18803 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 17th JULY, 2009. kvni