IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU TUESDAY, THE 10TH APRIL 2007 / 20TH CHAITHRA 1929 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1557 of 2007() ------------------------------ CRA.119/2006 of SESSIONS COURT, THALASSERY CC.568/2001 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, MATTANNUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER: PETITIONER/ACCUSED. ----------------------------------------------------------- PUTHUPARAMBIL SISUPALAN, S/O.KUMARAN, AGED 30 YEARS, PUTHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHERIYAMATTINNI, VAYATHUR, ARABI P.O. BY ADV. SRI.P.NARAYANAN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT. ------------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.LATHA THANKAPPAN THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.R.UDAYABHANU, J --------------------------------------------- CRL.R.P.No.1557 of 2007 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of April, 2007 ORDER The revision petitioner stands convicted by the appellate court for the offence under Section 324 IPC and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one year. In the appeal filed for the application to condone the delay was allowed on payment of cost on or before 13.3.2006. He submitted that the amount could not be remitted within the period prescribed by the appellate court. It is submitted that it so happened on account of the lapse on the part of the clerk of the counsel for the petitioner. 2. In the circumstances, revision petitioner is allowed to remit the amount within two weeks from today onwards in which contingency the appellate court shall condone the delay. The appellate court shall take the matter into file and dispose of the same on merits. The criminal revision petition is disposed of as above. K.R.UDAYABHANU, JUDGE csl