HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Writ Petition (S| No. 5749 of 2007 ^ PBTITIONER RESPONDENT8 Chamrurani Jaiswal Son of Shri Kalharam. Jaiswal, aged about 38 years, Resident of VUlage Kansari, ViU^e Panchayat Darwaja, Jaapad Panchayat Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ycrsus 1 State of Chliattisgarh, Tbrough: The Secretaiy, Panchayat aud Social Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 The CoUector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ' 3 The Mission Director, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Bilaspur, Distnct Bflaspur (C.G.) 4 The Chief Executive Officer, Jaapad Panchayat Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 The Block Education Officer, Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 The Gram Panchayat Darwaja, Through: The Sarpaach, Graai Panchayat Darwaja, Jaapad Panchayat Lormi, District Bilaspur(C.G.) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THB CON8TITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri P.P. Sahu and Shri S.P. Sahu, Advocates for the petitioner. Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Govt. Advocate for the State on advaace copy. W.P.fS) N0,5749 of 2007 ORAL ORDER (01.10.2007) SimiLKUMAR 8INHA, J. Heard. Learned counsel for fhe petitioner submits that fhe petitioner was appointed on the post of Guruji under Education Guarantee Scheme vide order dated 31.3.99 (Annexure-P/2) and he worked on the said post for reasonably long period but by impugned orderdated 20.1.2000 (Aimexure-P/1), his appoiutmeut was canceUed. It has beeii inentioned iu fhe impugned order fhat siace the appoiatment was made contrary to fhe nile, therefore, it has been canceUed. He further submits fhat fhis petition may be dlsposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to ffle a detaUed representation and with a direction to fhe concemed authority to decide fhe representation filed by the petitioner because fhe order is non-speaking order and it does not show fhat what was fhe irregularily ia fhe appoiatment of the petitioner. This Umited prayer inade by the leamed counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the leamed counsel for the State. The same is aUowed. Ifso advised, titie petitioner may ffle a detailed representation before fhe concemed authority along with copy of this order and copy of writ petition withia a period of 3 weeks fioin today aad if such a representation is filed, the same shaU be disposed ofby the concerued aufhority at the earliest by passing a reasoned order. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti