1 390.05-cr.revn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 390 OF 2005 Sou.Renuka Kishor Dhumale and another. ... Petitioners. V/s. Shri Kishor Raghunath Dhumale and another. ... Respondents. P.M.Arjunwadkar for the petitioners. Niranjan Mundargi for respondent No.1. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATED : 14th September 2011. P.C. : It is informed that the petitioner- wife and the respondent- husband have settled their differences and terms of settlement are presented in Hindu Marriage Petition No.32/2009. It is also informed that both petitioner- wife and and respondent- husband have also remarried and their matrimonial relations have already came to an end. With the consent of parties, the matrimonial relations between petitioner- wife and respondent- husband have been dissolved and the decree of divorce has been passed in the aforesaid Hindu Marriage Petition. So far as payment of maintenance is concerned, it is stated in the terms of settlement that the wife has accepted a sum of Rs.65,000/- towards full and final settlement for the maintenance of her daughter Vaishnavi. She has also undertaken not to claim maintenance amount 2 390.05-cr.revn in future. Copy of the terms of settlement tendered by the parties is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. 2. In view of settlement between the parties, nothing survives for consideration in this revision application. Criminal revision application, accordingly, stands disposed of. Rule stands discharged. 3. Pending criminal application, if any, also stands disposed of. (R.M.BORDE, J.)