HIGH COURT OF CHHATHS6ARH AT BILASPUR S.B. HON'BLE SHRI DHIRENDRA MISHRA. J ^€ W.P.frtNo.5684 of 2009 PETITIQNERS 1 2. Vs RESPON&ENTS : ^lK Shobha Sarkar, wife of Shri Din Bandhu Sarkar, aged about 38 years, residentof 18 Block, Ward No.9, Mana Camp, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Ramoni l-1aldor, son of Shri Narayon Chandra Kaldar, aged about 39 years, resident of House No.7/9, Block No.7, Mana Camp, Tehsjl Raipur, bistrict Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, &epartment of Urban Administration and Devetopment, t)KS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Roiipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Commissioner, t)epartmerit of Urban Administration and beyelopmsnt RDA Building, 1 Ftoor, Bajran9 Market, Raipur, District Koipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Collector, Raipur, Raipur, &istrict Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Present: Shri Amrito Das, learned counsel for the petitioviers. Shri Arun Sao, learned 6A for the State/respondents. j.j'.--,.^-i-irumsEiK ^^ ^^- ORALORDER (Passed on 5th October, 2009) Mirendra Mishra. J The petitioners by the instant petition have prayed for the following relief(s): "1. It is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pieased to call for the entire records conceming the reservation of President's post for Mana Camp Nagar Panchayat for its kind perusal. 2. This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ quashing and setting aside the order of reservation (Annexure P-l) to the extent whereby the post of President, Nagar Panchayat Mana Camp has been reserved for OBC candidate. 3. This Hon'ble Court may Rindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to de-notify the post of President of nagar Panchayat Mana Camp being reserved for a OBC candidate. 4. Any other relief/reliefs whichthis Hon'ble Court may think fit and proper in the facts oind the cjrcumstances of the case, with cost of the petition may also be pleased to be granted to the petitioner." Shri Das, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners haye already made a repressntation on 24.8.2009 vide Annexure P/6 before the State Sovernment, however, the State Sovernment has not taken any decision on their representation. He submits that he is not pressing this petition at this stage, however, he prays for direction to the respondent-State to decide the representation of Annexure P/6. Shri Sao, learned (3ovt. Adyocate for the State/respondents, submits ,that if the petitioners file fresh - representation before the respondent-State within a period of 10 days from today for redressal of their grieyance, the same shall be considered and decided on its own merits within a further period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. In view of above submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to file a fresh representation before the respondent-State raising their grievances raised in this petition within a period of 10 days from today. On such representation being made, the respondent-State shall consider ond decide the same on its own merits within a further period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation in accordance with law. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge r / ^v