iss-a*' w--'" .m*i .V''" <£> G.^.^ INLJTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR _j^^4^ CONTEMPTGASE.NO. -^ ^> ' OF 2008 y- PETITIONER: :^^^- lt6% <3 VERSUS Kamleshwar Prasad Mishra, Aged About- 58 S/o-Shri Chakodi Prasad Mishra, Occupation- Service (Forester-Vanpal), R/o- Village 8& Post-Baharashi Distt.-Korea (C.G.) 's.- RESPONDENT: S.P. Rajak, S/o- Not known to the petitioner, Divisional Forest Officer Forest Division- Manendragarh, Distt. Korea (C.G) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12/15 OFTHE CONTEMPTOF COURTS ACT. XI-HC-22 ^s? "iiwM'f, ^•rtly'iti. ftwi'yy w-iwr shii°h sn^r TRT^ !7. K»,53^71'% '^LOV-'(C^"W^ 200 I^^ST' sn^r^r h'IM Sf^S 5h*4ich •Htirl uespt) 311^1'FRTOT ^lftd 'bl^fcl'lil-f K|t<l'if'?feIZt tpil^K '^sif^nsn^i SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava. J. 27.04-2011 Shri Vinay Pandey, counsei for tl|ie petitioner. tinri h'awan snnvastava, counse At the outset, it is submitted bv 1 for the respondent. fcarned counsei for the parties that the order passed by this Court has been cohiplied with. in the return filed by the respc|ndent, it has been stated that order dated 20/08/08 was inadvertentiy issu^d but thereafter, the same has been corrected vide order dated 30/09/08 aihd ihe respondent has no intentlon to disobey the orders and proceedings of fie Court. Taking into consideration the s^ibmissions made by learned counsei for the parties and the repty of the resjsondent, i am not inclined to proceed furtherinthe maner. Accordingiy, the ru!e is discharg^d^ The petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge