: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.380 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.380 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.380 OF 2007 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.311 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.311 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.311 OF 2007 Gangadhar Aadappa Bandichode ...Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. Shri Shekhar Ingawale, adv. for the Applicant. Smt.M.M.Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 2nd April, 2007. DATE : 2nd April, 2007. DATE : 2nd April, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr.Ingawale, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mrs.Deshmukh, the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 7 and under Sections 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and he is sentenced to suffer R.I. for 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- on each count. He has preferred an appeal challenging the conviction and sentence. Appeal is admitted. By this application, he seeks bail pending the appeal. 3. Applicant was on bail during the trial and after conviction also, the trial Court had suspended the : 2 : execution of sentence under Section 389 of the Cr.P.C. Therefore, the applicant is granted bail on same terms and conditions as before the trial Court subject to his furnishing fresh bail bonds and depositing fine amount. 4. Request for suspension of conviction stands rejected. 5. Application stands disposed off. (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.) : 3 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.311 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.311 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.311 OF 2007 Gangadhar Aadappa Bandichode ...Appellant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. Shri Shekhar Ingawale, adv. for the Applicant. Smt.M.M.Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 2nd April, 2007. DATE : 2nd April, 2007. DATE : 2nd April, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr.Ingawale, the learned counsel for the appellant and Mrs.Deshmukh, the learned APP for the State. 2. Admit. (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.)