IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.535 of 2009 Jagdish Chauhan, son of Late Deonath Chouhan, resident of village Umraon Bigha, P.S. Hisua, District- Nawada …………. Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar 2.The Secretary, Department of Home (Police), Govt. of Bihar 3.The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna 4.The Deputy Inspector of Police, Magadh Division 5.The Superintendent of Police, Nawada 6.The Officer-in-charge, Narhat (Sitamarhi) Police Station, Nawada …………Respondents ----------- 2. 22/03/2010 Petitioner has raised a grievance in this case that the accused persons of Narhat P.S.Case No.88 of 2008 registered under section 302 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code are not being arrested by the police inspite of sufficient materials against them available in the records of the case. A counter affidavit has been filed and it is stated that out of five accused persons, two were arrested and have been allowed bail by the competent court and their trial is going on. With regard to rest of the three accused, it is stated that they are absconding. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that other three accused are freely moving and are not being identified as accused persons. - 2 - In the circumstances, petitioner is given liberty to assist the police and report the whereabouts of other accused by filing a petition before the Superintendent of Police, Nawada. As and when such a petition is filed by the petitioner giving whereabouts of the accused, the Superintendent of Police, Nawada shall issue necessary orders to the concerned police personnel to make a raid and arrest the accused persons. The writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh, J.)