f- ©lA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.No. So^) /2011 Sln '^y. ^ r\ ^ s'te' APPLICANTS ^ .<\r'.»* ^ »/ ?f ^' ^' "y/,^ ^^ ^ / RESPONDENTS: 1) Chetan S/o Shri Dohan Aged about 49 years, 2) Mulobai D/o Nabbar, aged about 80 years, 3) Mahesh Prasad S/o Ramvilas aged about 18 years, 4) Suraj F>rasad S/o RainvUas, aged about 13 years, 5) Biraj S/o Ranivilas, aged'about 15 years, 6) Shakunti Wd/o Ramnlas, aged about 45 years, 7) Atwari Wd/o RamvUas aged about 40 years, The appUcant No.4 & 5 through their natural guardiaa appeUant No. Chetan S/o Dohan (Grand Father) AU resident of viUage Suvarpara, Tahsil Sitapur, Distnct Sarguja (C.G.) -'^AppUcants in review petition before learaed Board of Revenue) VERSUS 1) Pitar Bada,aged about 45 years, S/o Late Marsel Bada i + •iw^-.,....S-' Xi-HC—78 an^wfeN? wi ans?! wnq; &<(~I^ '3~er'^l'qicW, ^itftWT®,f»<cll'Mll< _-..-.M/L^.^5.5.. b sn^! ^raq? (T4t3^9) TOnwHfta-w^ Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kiunar <*il''<f<'f41-f tfPRfl'? fsIZI :rf5R?TC ^sfRmarRRi Mishra.J. 10.08.2011 Miss. Sudha Agrawal, coujnsel for the applicants. Shri Pradeep Smgh, PL fo}- the State. ! Heard on I.A. No.l for jcondonation of delay in filing the restoration application. For the reasons assigned n application, this court is satisfied that Ihe applicant has been abl^ to explain the delay in filing the 1 restoration application. I.A. No.l for condonation^ifdelay is allowed. Also heard on applicat(on for restoration of W.P.(227) No.4993/2008, which was disrfiissed for want of prosecution on 26/08/2010. On due consideration an<i for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, this MCC] is allowed. The order dated 26/08/201i0 is recalled. W.P.(227) No.4993/2008 <s restored to its original number. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge ^