IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION (SS) No. 36 of 2011 Smt. Kamlesh Shahi ……Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …Respondents. Present: Ms. Pushpa Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to transfer the services of the petitioner in any nearby native place of petitioner at Rishikesh, district Dehradun. 3. The contention of the petitioner is that she has made a representation before the Director, Education on 22.8.2010, which is still pending for disposal. 4. Be that as it may, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move a fresh representation for redressal of her grievance. If such a representation is made, the same shall be decided by a reasoned order, expeditiously within a period of four weeks from the date of making such representation 5. With the aforesaid directions, the instant writ petition is disposed of. 6. All the pending applications stand disposed of. (B.S. Verma, J.) Vacation Judge 11.1.2011 Rathour