THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU Crl.P.No. 8714 of 2010 ORDER Petitioners 1 to 3/A1 to A3 are accused of offences punishable under Section 498-A/34 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. A1 is husband and A2 and A3 are parents-in-law of the second respondent/de facto complainant. The marriage between A1 and the second respondent took place on 15.05.2009. It is alleged that the petitioners received dowry of Rs.15,00,000/-, 80 sovereigns of gold, Acs.12.00 of land from parents of the second respondent. It is further alleged that the first petitioner with the support of petitioner Nos.2 and 3 was harassing the second respondent for the sake of additional dowry. It is contended by the petitioners’ counsel that on the nuptial day, the second respondent did not allow A1 to have cohabitation with her and behaved in a wild manner as a psycho and that without informing nature of the second respondent, her parents performed her marriage with A1 and that when questioned, mother of the second respondent apologized for not disclosing the said psychic nature of the second respondent and that therefore, there is separation between the parties. This is defence version pleaded by the petitioners in this petition. This Court while sitting under Section 482 Cr.P.C., cannot consider independent defence version put forwarded by the accused. It is a matter of proof on the basis of evidence furnished by the accused before the Investigating Officer or the trial Court. On reading of allegations in FIR, this Court finds that necessary ingredients in respect of the offences for which FIR was issued, are made out therein. Hence, the petition is dismissed. ______________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J Date:30.08.2010 sj