:'!•'?B Pi ?^'t iKa ^""s-'".'?^ ^. C.F\-^t IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT I. P. (S) No. ^^&l^ ^ PETrTCONER .-•^ /'^..-•' 'y^.--'ryr/ "y .-••'.a^S/'' ^?-' ^ ^. <<• about 39 years, Assistant Primary School - P. -Korba, bistt. - RESPONDENTS / 1. State of Chhattisgarh ^ ^ r°7 ^^/^^ \^' ^ <gy fr. o 2. The District Education Officer. 3. Assistant Commiss Tribal Welfare Korba (C.6.) 4. Block Education Distt. - Korba (C.G.) !^, WRIT PETETION UNDER ARTCCLE 226 NATURE OF MAN&AMUS. CERTIORARI OF WRIT OF LIKE NATURE The petitioner most humbly begs to submit as under:- »"" ^•. >7 Petitioner : Vijay Kumar Dwiyedi Versus ftespondents State of Chhattisgarh and others SB: Hon'bie AAr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Present: AAr. Amit Sharwa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sushi! Dubey, 6.A. for the respondents/State. (Passed on 21OT Day of February, 2007) 1. The petitioner was appointed on 5/9/1989 as Assistant Teacher on fixed pay scale of Rs. 300/-. After completion of two year probation, he was granted regular pay scale of Rs. 975-1650/-. 2. Learned counsel cppeoring for tiie petitioner submits that the issue involved in the case is as to whether, the petitioner is antitied to regular pay scaie w.e.f. •Hie date of initia! appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by the AAadhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabaipur in O.A.NO. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of fA.P. & others), wherein it was held that the similorly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken-up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leo.ve Petition (Ciyil) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble Suprewe Court upholding the decision of the Tribuna! to the effect that 1+ie Teachers/Assistwit Teachers are entitled to rsgular pay sca!e from c'ate of initia! appointment. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submits that this Court, while considering the same issue in Sushi! Tiwari & others Vs. State 6ovt. of Chhati-isgarh & others (W.P. (S) No.5976 of 2006) by or-der dated 7-11-2006, has granted regular pay scaie w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. 5. Lsarned counsei appearing for the parties jointiy submit that this case is squarely coyered by the decision of this Court in the case of Sushil Tiwcri & ol+iers Vs. Stste 6ovt. of Chhattisoarh & others ,^~ r (Supra). 6. In view of that this petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge