"I u-u*u'-^-u'~u"u''^~-u"^-^'-^.''V ^^ .^?pttf*t^ ijt^un ^ -\ 0 .^. i, ' '^ IN THE HON'BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (2271 No. f L/ 0 7 /2009 C(^ PETITIONE PCu^>^ 1. \>s ^^s^ fi^ ^\ ^^^y 2. ^^ffy ^t&^.^ ^^~ffl W!^ RESPONDENTS/1 !)e^^-^~' 1. ^' ft 2. 3. 4. Ripusudan Shrivas S/o Late Barmanlal Shrivas Aged about 59 years, Radha Krishna Shrivas S/o Late Barmanlal Shrivas Aged about 49 years, Both R/o Near Dam Beladula, Tahsil & Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Collector, Raigarh Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) Nazul Officer, Raigarh (C.G.) President Sikh Society Raigarh (C.G.) Anand Mohan Rabada S/o Late M.M. Rabana- R/o Gauri Shankar Mandir Road, Raigarh (C.G.) ^6l3{^ PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ F —78 ^-^et> y W1<»11 <t»l(eh '3~5ET ^I^IKrl^/ ^Tll^^Ko, [®l<yll<H^< ^^L^?.ll^o.?)... "^ 200 g a^?r Tr^7 (licli^<^) s^^r^TN' ^^,^^^jN7 ^TTW^ft^^nt^ S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Aaarwal 27.07.2009 Shri Devendra Patel, Advocjate forthe petitioners. Shri PK Bhaduri, Panel Lav^ The instant petition is di| 02.12.2008, whereby and where^nder the review appiication filed under Order 47 Rule 1 read with rejected which was filed against |the order 17.11,2007 (Annexure The brief facts of the case for declaration and permanent seeking the relief of injunction ag|ainst the defendant No. 1 & 2 to the effect that the suit jand shal the revenue case No. 8A 68/64-61 ^l^td^l'1 'RPR^it ^f 'fe^st <Rn^« i73TfiR37T^T yer for the State. •ected against the order dated Section 114 of CPC, has been P/8), passed by the llnd Addition^I District Judge (FTC), Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh. ^re that, the petitioner filed a suit (njunction before the triai court not be allotted without perusing , and to restrain the defendantto interfere in possession of the petit|oner over the suit property. The plaintiff filed an applic^tion under Order 11 Ruie 12 of CPC for discovery of the docume|its and the same was dismissed \-- ;«T ^''^^^:::: XI-^C—78 's^r ^ww^, fs-^w^, fsi<ni'y^< HW^l VhWQh •^20Q3 w^i Tr^5' (yit^^i) ^T^?^T^ ^^T^fl^f^.^W^ Sahu ^ ^^nw^f^? 3^1 by the trial court vide order dat| review petition was filed. The tr|; parties, dismissed the review petiti{ After hearing learned couns|el after perusing the record, 1 do not the order impugned leading to m| extra ordinary jurisdiction of this| Constitution of India. it is well settled principl|s exercise of its supervisory juriSG| Constitution of india, shouid refl'ain the order passed by the Court| where perversity, illegality, irre^ularity writ Jarge on the face of the rec<|) case. The petition deserves to b\ No order asto costs. ^)l^I<n<fll 'RR^f ^f 1^^ ^psi^K ^^tRmSTT^T 3d 17.11.2007. Against that,a a! court, after hearing both the )n. el appearing for the parties and Rnd and illegality or perversity in inifest injustice so as to invoke court under Article 227 of the 3 of law that this Court, in iction under Article 227 of the itself from interfering with below, except in such cases or jurisdictional error is >rd, which is not in the present ?and is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge /•J 1