^.'rt.^ 'B l.a ";; I I:i HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH A'T BILASPUR WRIT PEI'ITION (S-S No. 5834of2008 PETmONER : Ga&or Mohainmad RAeem S/o Late Shaikh Raheem Ased about 68 vears Retired Head Master R/o Near Tili Bandha Makka Masjid. Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattissarii Department of School Edueation. Through its PrinciDal Secretar/- D.K.S. BhawaiL Raipur (C.G.) 2. Coirimissioner, Public Iiistructions, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Director. Public Instructioro, Raipur (C.G.) 4. District Educatiosi OfGcer. Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 5. Divisional Joint Director. Treasurv Accounts aiid Pension, Raipur (C.G.) WRH' PEnTIDN UNS3ER ARTICT£226Z22ZC)FJIffiCONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Asmliotri, J. Present: Shri A.S.Raiout Advocate forthe oetitioner. Slui M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Govenuiient Advocate forthc State/respondents. (Passed oniO!E-da7:rf-Ortober, 2008) 1. With tlie consent ofths parties, the raatter is taken up tor fmal heermg. 2. Learaed counsei appearins for the petitioner submits that the disputs involved in the present petition is asto whether the order for recoven' of some amount can. be passed after retirement of an employee, without alibrding any opporhmity ofhearing. He farther subiiiits that the cass of the peutioner is squarely covered by the judgment aiid order dated 2 May, 2008 passed by this'Court m W.P. No. 3293/2007. Shri Rajput farther submils fhat the petitioner has made a representation on 23.8.2008 (.Aruie^a-ire P/6) to the Principal of the institute. I-Ie farflier seeks oenaission offhis Court to make a fresh representation in lieht ofthe -7- 4. above-stated judsment and order to the authorities concemed, and in tum, the responde.nt authorities may be directed to coasider asd decide the same on its ovi'n merits, in accordance witli law, after affordmg an oppommity ofhearing. VT Sliri M.P.S. Bhatia, leamed Deputy Govemment Advocate appearing for the State/respondeats submits that the dispute involved in this petition is no longer res nova aiid fhe representation of the pstitioner shai' be considered and decided on its ow/n merits, preferably witjiin a period of 8 vveeks from the date of receipt of the representation; and appropriate orders shall be passed accordingly. In view of the foregoing, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing remains for adjudication. .ccordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd,/- SadshK.Agnihotri Judge