IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.955 of 2011 MD.ISHAQUE . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Shambhu Sharan Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, AC to AAG III ------ 2. 11.02.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the alleged illegal occupation of 30 dec. of his land situated on Plot No. 1820 (New 3740), Khata No. 2 (New 933), Mauza Rajpura, Circle Nasriganj in the District Rohtas. It is submitted that the lands are private raiyati lands held under valid title. The respondents without following the procedure established by law have cut and destroyed his standing crops for construction of Pump Chamber by Public Health & Engineering Department. Learned Counsel for the State points out that the petitioner appears to have sent a notice under Section 80 CPC on 11.6.2010. Treating the notice as a representation with liberty to supplement the same, if so advised, the application is disposed with a direction that if the petitioner files such an application before Respondent No. 6, the District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, within a period of four weeks from today, let the same be disposed off by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law after due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a maximum period of six weeks from the date of receipt and or presentation of a copy of such representation. If the stand taken by the petitioner raises serious questions of title requiring examination of documentary and oral evidence, the respondents are expected to keep in mind that in summary proceeding of the present manner, issues of title cannot be decided. Any construction made by the respondents in the meantime shall naturally remain subject to the final order that may be passed at any stage in the proceeding between the parties. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)