1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2545 OF 2008 Chandrakant Bhikaji Chipkar & Ors. ... Petitioners Vs. NOCIL Provident Fund Trust & Ors. ... Respondents Ms. Gyatri Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. P.A.Savant i/b. Vigil Juris, Advocates, for the respondent No.1. Mrs. S.V.Bharucha, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 2 & 3. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 15th February, 2010. P.C. 1. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. In view of the affidavit reply filed by respondent Nos. 2 and 3 saying that they have no objection to the amount being distributed, the Consent Terms signed by the petitioners and the respondent No.1 are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. We make it clear that this order will not bind respondent No.4. Rule made absolute in terms of the Consent Terms. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)