IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 7TH MARCH 2011 / 16TH PHALGUNA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 86 of 2011(S) ------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.22906/2008 Dated 28/01/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- BINDU THOMAS, AGED 37 YEARS, W/O. K.P.ANILKUMAR, TECHINICIALN GRADE-I, MODEL POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, MALA, KALLETTUMKARA, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAMESH BABU RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- PROF. V.SUBRAMANI, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, EMPLOYED AS DIRECTOR, I.H.R.D., REVENUE TOWERS, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SHRI M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS,SC,IHRD THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------ Con.Case(C).No.86 of 2011 ------------------------------ Dated this the 7th day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT As per the order dated 28th January, 2009, in WP(C) No.22906 of 2008, interim stay was extended staying the recovery of the excess salary allegedly drawn by the petitioner. Later, as per Annexure-A3 communication was issued by the respondent to the Principal of the College, requesting the latter not to sanction further increment to the petitioner, until the interim stay is vacated by the High Court. According to the petitioner, Annexure-3 amounts to contempt of court and violation of the interim order dated 28th January, 2009. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that subsequently Annexure-3 has been challenged by the petitioner in a Writ Petition and therefore, it is not necessary to prosecute the Contempt Case. The Contempt Case is, accordingly, closed. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE. cms