: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.17424 OF 2008 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.504 OF 2007 Shri Pravinkumar Manikchand Pagariya & Ors. ..Applicants. Vs. Shri Gurulingappa Dagdappa Satbhai (D/H.) & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.P.B.Shah, Senior Counsel with Mr.Vivek Salunke for the Applicants. None for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 5TH AUGUST, 2008 DATED : 5TH AUGUST, 2008 DATED : 5TH AUGUST, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : There is no case for review. Mr.Shah does not dispute the claim of the Respondent landlord as far as the residential premises are concerned. 2. Thus, even assuming that the observation in paragraph 3 of the order sought to be reviewed viz. that the remaining son is a mere daily wage earner, is incorrect, it would in the end result make no difference. As far as the commercial premises are concerned, in respect whereof alone, Mr.Shah challenges the order, the case has been made out even otherwise. : 2 : 3. The Review Petition is therefore dismissed.