IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17785 of 2010 NAGENDRA SINGH, SON OF LATE RAMADHAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 09.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that even though the petitioner is said to have murdered his wife but there are materials to suggest that the deceased was in fact, not living with the petitioner before her death rather she was living in her sister-in- law’s house. It has also been submitted that it is not a case under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, so there is no question of any presumption against the in-laws of the deceased. The entire case is based merely on suspicion on account of a vague motive. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 6.2.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 99 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the 2 petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)