IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.340 of 2010 1. NAVIN KUMAR MANDAL SON OF BINAY KUMAR MANDAL 2. DHANESHWAR MANDAL SON OF LATE MOTI MANDAL 3. MAHENDRA YADAV SON OF LATE MANGAN YADAV. ALL RESIDENT OF VILAGE NAYANAND GOLA, P.S. TIKAPATTI, DISTRICT, PURNEA. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COLLECTOR, PURNEA. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PURNEA. 4. THE SUB- DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DHAMDHA, PURNEA. 5. THE OFFICER INCHARGE, TIKAPATTI, POLICE STATION, PURNEA. 6. MD. SAFIQUE SON OF LATE CHHEDI MAIN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAYANAND TOLA, POLICE STATION TIKAPATTI, DISTRICT PURNEA. ----------- 2 16.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Mr. Bhola Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer of the petitioner is that the private respondents should be restrained from interfering with the possession of the property in question. Although, respondent no. 4 has passed an order in a proceeding under Section 144 Cr.P.C. on 21st of January 2010, but, respondent no. 6 is violating the order of the S.D.O. However, it will be open for the petitioner to approach the respondent no. 4 to take appropriate action in the proceeding. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ application stands disposed of. Amrendra/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)