SINGLE BENCH ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR W.P.No. 4oi^ /2005 y PETITIONER ./ ^' ./°'^' ^ ^^ ^A2\^ ^^"y ^' / Kabeer Das S/o Late Lal Das aged about 52 years, R/o Rajeev Vihar, Rampur, Korba Distt. Korba (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS /' 0?'1 GO ^^^ ^\^ 1,. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- Its Secretary Department of Public Works D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralay, RABPUR (C.G.) 2/ Department of Public Works Through :- Its Chief Engineer P.W.D, RAIPUR (C.G.) 7 3^ Sub Divisional Officer, Department of PubUc Works Korba Sub- Division, Distt. KORBA (C.G.) <<WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA" ^^i(^^.*<»^ TPTcCT^HT^P \J^T< ^l^l^, U>-^1^<1<?, RlOW^ ..^.:..P.;....<L^(C. 3Tl^9T q^P (ljc|i^6|c£;) ^200 6" 3n^5T95TRTli<fr ?PTT3n^'$Tff?+li<p Sarma ?TcTTW?^rf^T3n^^T <Shl^fc641v1 WraT^f f^^KRl^-ci^ ^^ri^ran^^T 21.09.2005 Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, learhed counsel for the petitioner. | Mr. Vivek Sharma, leahed Panel Lawyer for the State of Chhattisgarfl Heard. 4. Learned counsel for th submits that the petitioner was Gangman in the Public Works petitioner working as iDepartment. The petitioner had been retired oi|i completion of 30 years of service. He further|submits that the dispute involved in the pre^ent case is squarely covered by the o^-der dated 15.09.2005 passed by this Court ii| of 2005 and other connected mattel Learned counsel appeari] respondents does not dispute the| present case is covered by the 15.09.2005 as stated above. In view of the foregoing, th| allowed in terms ofthe order datecj passed in W.P.No. 93 of 200^ connected matters. No order as to Consequently, all pending also stand disposed of. 1 W.P.No.93 ig for the fact that the order dated e petition is 15.09.2005 and other t?osts. lapplications Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge SP-T-"S/2005-20.000 ^