1 APPW434.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.434 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3650 OF 2010 KJ Anil @ Raju Namdeo Patil )..Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra )..Respondents ---- Mr.D.A.Nalawade for Union-territory of Div & Daman. Mrs. A.S.Pai APP for respondent/State. ---- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR & P.D.KODE, JJ DATE : 13th October, 2011 PC 1 The grievance in this petition is that furlough leave application preferred by the petitioner has not been considered by the appropriate authority so far. Pursuant to notice, Mr.Nalawade for the Union territory of Div & Daman, has invited our attention to the order dated 26.7.2011 and submits that the petitioner has 2 APPW434.11.sxw filed fresh application by providing the same surety referred to in paragraph-2 of the said order. However the authority has not verified whether the said surety is now willing to accept the petitioner’s surety. If there is changed circumstances, we find no reason why the appropriate authority cannot process the furlough leave application in respect of the same surety. Mr.Nalawade appearing for the Union territory submits that in that case, appropriate authority will make necessary inquiry and process the petitioner’s application in accordance with law. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of on the basis of the above assurance. 2 Copy of the order be forwarded to the petitioner for information who is presently in jail. The appropriate authority shall decide the proposal as expeditiously as possible preferably within eight weeks from today. (P.D.KODE,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) 3 APPW434.11.sxw