THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH W.P.NO.5322 OF 2006 Between: Tunuguntla Venkateswarlu and others …Petitioners And The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and others …Respondents ORDER: Petitioners question the action of the respondents in proposing to allot the land in between the petitioners’ land of an extent of Ac.0.28 cents in Sy.No.1/3B of Vaddavalli Village i.e., strip of land in between the petitioners’ land of an extent of Ac.3.40 cent in Sy.No.369 of Sattenapalli and the road margin as illegal and arbitrary. It is stated that the petitioners herein along with others jointly purchased land to an extent of Ac.3.40 cents of land in Sy.No.369 of Sattenapalli Village, Guntur District under two different sale deeds document nos.3199/84, dt.26.6.1984 and 4023/84 dt.17.7.1984 and thereafter they have divided into equal shares and each of them got 0.48½ cents. It is stated that the said lands of the petitioners are abutting to Guntur – Macherla Road and their respective shares of land are facing the road and they are cultivating the said small strip of land. To reach the main road leading from Guntur to Macherla, there is a small strip of Government land to an extent of 0.28 cents in Sy.No.1/3B of Vaddavalli village. It is stated that the said small extent of 0.28 cents is sought to be assigned by the respondents in favour of private parties on the market value. It is the case of the petitioners that the said land is made use for ingress and egress by the petitioners, they are ready to pay the market value of the said land and without considering their claim the respondents are proposing to allot the said small strip of land to third parties. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader on behalf of the respondents. Petitioners have not made any representation before the respondents seeking for allotment of the said small strip of land in their favour on payment of market value. Without their being any demand or request made before the respondents, the petitioners are not entitled for any relief in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to file application before the authorities seeking the said relief. No order as to costs. __________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. March 18, 2006. kpr