BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Third day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15208 of 2011 1. SANKARALINGAM 2. S. RAJAMANICKAM 3. S. SUNDARALINGAM @ ANANDAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO. 1 TO 3 Vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAMPATTI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. CR NO. NOT KNOWN/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.THIRUMAL Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. According to their submissions, the offences said to have been committed by the petitioners are only under Sections 294(b) and 323 of I.P.C. There is no clubbing of 341 and 506(i) of I.P.C. Both the offences are bailable in nature. 3. Therefore the petition for anticipatory bail is not maintainable. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. sd/- 23/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NATHAMPATTI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. V.THIRUMAL Advocate SR.No.41202 SR : 24.11.2011 : 1P/4C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15208 of 2011 Date :23/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/