IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9773 of 2010 1. BHUNA SINGH 2. Bhushan Singh @ Chandra Bhushan Singh 3. Anshu Kumar Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 25.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that final form was submitted in the case exonerating all the accused persons except husband finding no corroboration which is vehemently opposed on behalf of the learned counsel for the informant, who was assisting the state that witnesses are there to state the demand and torture after killing in corroboration of F.I.R. but F.I.R. in itself is mentioning vague allegation for demand against all the family members and specific occasion is shown that at a point of time Rs. 40,000/- was given by the informant along with uncle to mother-in-law of the deceased which she thrown any how she along with her husband accepted the same and threatening was given by both to eliminate the deceased. Petitioner no.2 is cousin of the husband and petitioner no.3, younger brother. Death is said un-natural within seven years of the marriage in matrimonial house 2 followed by torture for non-fulfillment of the demand soon before the death. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner no.1 is rejected and at the same time, prayer of the petitioners no. 2 and 3 is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Maranchi (Panch Mahla) O.P. P.S. Case No. 32 of 2009, above named petitioners no.2 and 3 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)