The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.31664 of 2011 Date: 01-12-2011 Between: Yatham Moses Raju ..... Petitioner AND The Public Information Officer, The Tahsildar, Bapatla Mandal, Bapatla, Guntur District. .....Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.B.Thimothi Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for Revenue The Court made the following : Order: This Writ Petition is ﬁled for a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents, in not furnishing information along with copies of certain documents in pursuance of the petitioner’s RTI application, dated 14-09-2011, as illegal. At the hearing, Sri B.Thimothi, learned Counsel for the petitioner, fairly conceded that, against the inaction of the respondent, his client has a remedy of appeal under Section 19 (1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (for short ‘the Act’), and a further appeal under Section 19 (3) of the Act. In view of availability of the successive alternative remedies, I am not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition. The learned Counsel submitted that since the petitioner was not aware of existence of alternative remedies, he could not file the appeal in time. The petitioner is given liberty to ﬁle an appeal together with an application for condonation of delay and if such application is ﬁled, this Court has no reason to doubt that the appellate authority will consider the same and pass appropriate order thereon in accordance with law. Subject to the above observations, the Writ Petition is dismissed. As a sequel, WPMP.No.39292 of 2011, ﬁled by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 1st December, 2011 LUR