IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. fC) No. 37&°) /2011 PETITIONER :^Smt. Rajkumari, W/o Late Maniram Goyal, aged about 66 years, R/o Jute Mill Road, Chatamuda, Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS /l) Municipal Corporation, Raigarh, Through its Commissioner Raigarh, ^^^" Di Raigarh (C'G') ^'^y^f^^\\ ^2) Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh ^.--'^.-•^^^ (C-G-) ^••^%^ ^'.^?^"<z/v •€^>" ^A',0*- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS. ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION /DIRECTIONS ETC. 1?< ^ HIGH CQURT QF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRTT PETmON (C) No. 3769 (rf2011 SmL Rajkumari. RESPONDENTS VERSUS Municipal Corporatioa, Raigarh & Anofher. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OFINDIA 8B: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agtnhotri, J. Present: SmL Hanrida Siddique, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri H.B.Agrawal, Semor Advocate wifli Smt. Meera Jaiswal, Advoeate for the respondent No. 1. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondentNo.2. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 14U day ofJuly, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for Ifae petitidner submits fliat the petitioner has not received any notice in respect of the petition seheduled land, however, Ihe proeess of demolition has already taken place by the respondent No. 1. 2. At ttus juncture, Shri Agrawal, leamed senior counsel appearing wifh Smt. Jaiswal, for the respondent No. 1 and Shri Bhaduri, learaed Panel Lawyer appearing for fhe State/respondent N6. 2 submit fhat ao demolition on Ae part ofthe respondent aulfaorities shall be taken without following tfae due process oflaw. 3. In view of the above, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in fhis petition for adjudieation at 1his stage. 4. Aceordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. SatishK.Agmhotri Judge Amit