CMPMO No.72 of 2008 27.3.2008 Present: Mr.Tara Singh Chauhan, counsel for the petitioner. This petition is directed against the order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur permitting the claimant to lead additional evidence. According to the averments made in the claim petition the claimant suffered injuries in an accident. To prove these injuries and the disability allegedly caused to the claimant, a Doctor was summoned. For some reason the Doctor was not examined and the evidence of the claimant was closed. Thereafter, when the arguments were being heard, an application was moved to summon the said doctor again to prove the disability certificate. This application has been allowed subject to payment of costs. In my considered view, the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal has passed the impugned order which he was within his jurisdiction to pass. There is no jurisdictional error in the order passed by him and the same cannot be said to be illegal or contrary to law. In view of the above, there is no merit in the petition which is dismissed. CMP No.167 of 2008: In view of the dismissal of the main petition, this application is also dismissed. March 27, 2008. (Deepak Gupta), PV Judge