Kg g-iiéH COURT GF C§v3HATTI$GARH: BaLA$PUR Writ Petitioua (SLNO. 237‘? of 2W8 Fet§tion9r Ra} Kumar Sam S/o Shri Fu§sai Sahu aged abcut 35 years, R/b. ViHage Harethikalé Tah' Sakti, Di$t JanjgEr—Champa {CG}. Versus Chairman Csai indie Ltd.. ”Hi6. Netaii Sumas‘n Road, Kaékata (WE). 2} Directcvr (Pig HQ), (toa‘ inCfEa Ltd, m. Netaéi Subhash Road, Kmkata (WB). 3) Member $ecretaw, J’acc —VI (Jcim Biparties fn h, ResgondeMs W r T §ndu¢ryi (Sea? md§a RUad, f\m&at& (‘v’ygl 4) Cha§rman—cum-Managing Directcr, 8.E.C.L‘ Head Qtr. Seepat Read, BHaspur (GG). Chief Generai Manager, SECL, Area Knrba, n f* Kcrbn ’N‘)‘ LL.“ , mmaji cUutm‘at C‘ k w i .J.a..h. ..‘ \L’WJ U1 a; (Writ Petition undsr Articie 226 of the Canstituticn of india) $8: Hcn’bae 3W. Saiish K. £graihctri, J. Present: Shri Rahui Mishra, counsel for the petiticher. Sm? Vivek $harma, Advecate with Shri Praa'een Das, saunas! f0! the respanden’cs Na. 4 and 5. GRIXL QwQ’ER {Fagserg en. 23’3“ :gay 9f Agni; gm} With consent of bath ihe parties. the matter is heave finaiiy. 2‘: Learned counsei aepearmg for 30th the earties icinizv submit i‘nat the petitioner is simisariy situated {o mat of the resinoridents in the matter cf Chairman. Central Ccaifieids Ltd. & Gihers Vs Jivendra Prasaci Tiwari & Gihei’e (Civéi Aspeai Noe ”x714 of 203.7), which was diseased 0f vide Order dated 29‘“ March, 2GQZ passed by the Hon’bie Supreme Cour? 4 Learned counsei further submit that thie case may aiso be Raj u i i + 7 Judge at; disposed of in the same terms. 3) in view of the above, the petition stands dispesed sf in the same terms. No erder aeio costs i I \ i Sci/— if V Satish‘K Agnihngyi / L