1 Writ Petition No.10755 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Writ Petition No.10755 OF 2010 With Civil Application No.2174 Of 2011 Late Tulsaaie Bahu-uddeshiya Mahila Mandal, Vitner, Taluka Chopda. ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra And Others. ... Respondents. -------- Shri. Vinod Pl. Patil, Advocate for petitioner. Shri. N.R. Shaikh, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri. S.R. Patil, for applicant in CA No.2174 of 2011. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE: 11th FEBRUARY 2011 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.4338 of 2009 challenging the judgment and order passed in 2 Writ Petition No.10755 of 2010 Complaint ULP No.80 of 2002. By an order dated 4th December 2009 the learned Single Judge admitted the petition and granted interim relief in terms of prayer clause D as prayed in the said petition. Under the interim order the effect and operation of the impugned judgment and order of the Industrial Court passed in Complaint ULP No.80 of 2002 was stayed. 3) The earlier management Kisan Bahuudeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal filed Writ Petition No.4440 of 2009 challenging the same judgment and order passed by the Industrial Court. The said petition came to be admitted on 4th December 2009 and it was directed to be heard along with Writ Petition No.4338 of 2009. 4) In the present writ petition, filing of those two writ petitions is not disclosed by the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw this petition in view of the fact that two writ petitions filed earlier have been admitted. It is expected that, the petitioner in fairness had disclosed these facts. 3 Writ Petition No.10755 of 2010 5) Leave is granted. The writ petition is disposed as withdrawn. Civil Application No.2174 of 2011 is dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl