IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.82 of 2008 ANIL KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 10.12.2008 In the instant writ application the petitioner submits that he has been falsely implicated in this case by the Police of Industrial Area. He submits that he is the owner of Cinema Hall, namely, Shankar Talkies, as well as market in which there are substantial shops. It is submitted that as he has not been able to fulfill the demand of the respondents, local police including Industrial Area Police have instituted case against him. The learned counsel for the State submits that petitioner is accused in some other case also. The petitioner has always been behaving in a high handed manner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is accused in 4 – 5 cases and has been acquitted in one case. He had been made accused in Industrial P.S. Case No.292/89 under section 392 of I.P.C. also in which charge sheet has been submitted. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties this Court is not inclined to pass any positive order in this case. In case petitioner has any grievance in relation to investigation or acts of police, it would be open for him to represent to superior officers. With the aforesaid observation, this writ application is disposed of. Anilksinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.) 2