8.1.2008 Present: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, counsel for the petitioners. The following dispute was referred for adjudication by the Labour Court under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act:- “Whether the termination of services of Shri Dalip Singh , S/o Sh. Partap Singh, w.e.f. 21.11.1999 by the Executive Engineer, H.P.S.E.B. Division, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P without complying the provisions of Section 25-G and Section 25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 whereas work and funds are available as alleged by workman, is proper and justified ? If not, what relief of service benefits the aggrieved workman is entitled to ?” The parties were permitted to lead evidence by the learned Labour Court and after hearing the matter, the learned Labour Court has come to the conclusion that the termination of the services of the workman was against the standing orders of the Electricity Board. He has directed that the respondent workman be reengaged in the same capacity. The learned Labour Court further ordered that break in service shall not affect the service of the respondents. No back wages have been granted in favour of the workman. The award of the learned Labour Court is based on appreciation of evidence and is a pure finding of fact. In writ jurisdiction, we cannot interfere with this finding of fact. The writ petition is accordingly rejected. ( Deepak Gupta ), J. January 8, 2008(K) ( V. K. Ahuja ), J.