IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2512 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:23.05.2011. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. ...Petitioner Versus Raghavinder Dass ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. V. Ramswaroop, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for the respondent. ***** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed against order dated 23.02.2010 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Ambala Cantt. by which application filed by the petitioner/tenant for adjourning the eviction petition filed by the landlord sine die on the ground that an Interpleader Suit filed by them to know as to who is the owner of the demised property is pending adjudication, has been declined. Learned counsel for the petitioner/tenant has brought to the notice of the Court that the said Interpleader Civil Suit No.35 of 2002, which was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company Limited against Smt. Savita Dass, Mrs. Deepa Pratap Dass, Shri R.K.Dass and Shri Vijeyander Dass has already been decreed on 15.10.2010 holding defendant No.1 (Smt. Savita Dass) to be the owner of the suit property in accordance with Will dated 11.08.1999 and she has been held entitled to recover the rent amount from the plaintiff. In view thereof, once it is decided by the Civil Court that Smt. Savita Dass is the owner and also the landlord, who has been held entitled to receive the rent, the application for adjourning the case sine die has no value and has rightly been dismissed by the learned Rent Controller. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the present revision petition and as such, the same is hereby dismissed, however, without any order as to costs. May 23, 2011. (Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge