1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.15 OF 2005. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.15 OF 2005. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.15 OF 2005. IN SUIT NO.41 OF 2003. Lal Bherumal Laungani & Anr. ...Plaintiffs. V/s. Max Cajetan Travasso & Ors. ...Defendants. Mr. Niranjan Lapavia i/b Niranjan & Co. for Plaintiffs. Mr.A.Y.Bookwala i/b Pankaj thathe for defendants. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : JUNE 6, 2005 DATE : JUNE 6, 2005 DATE : JUNE 6, 2005 P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Heard counsel for the parties. Defendants seek inspection of documents mentioned in Schedule as follows. (a) Receipts, vouchers, Bills and all documents in respect of alleged expenditure of Rs.4 Crores by the Plaintiff as claimed in the plaint. (b) Plaints in 180 Suits filed by the Plaintiff against the tenants of the Defendants in the court of Small Causes 2 at Bombay. 2. In so far as the documents mentioned in Item -(a), the counsel for the plaintiffs submits that inspection of all the relevant receipts, vouchers and bills and documents which were in possession of the plaintiffs, has already been given to the defendants and there are no further receipts, vouchers and bills or documents of which inspection is to be given to the defendants. This statement is accepted. According to the counsel for the defendants, however, the plaintiffs have given inspection of documents which do not pertain to expenditure of Rs.4 Crores. 3. In so far as inspection of documents, mentioned in the item-(b), the counsel for the plaintiffs assures to give inspection of the relevant documents within two weeks, from the date when the defendants would give intimation about the numbers of suits. 4. The Chamber summons is disposed of on the above terms.