PNP 1 WP48-23.8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.48 OF 2010 Yucca Bocarro, nee Yufa Tereza D’Almadia ..Petitioner. Vs. Raigad Military School Trust and others ..Respondents. .... Mr.A.A. Kumbhakoni with Mr. M.A.Narvekar for the Petitioner. Mr.Vinay Bhate for Respondents 1 to 9. Mr. G.W.Mattos, AGP for Respondents 10 to 12, 14 to 16 and 20. Ms. V.S.Garpure for the BMC. ..... CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C. J. & DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. 23rd August 2010. P.C. : 1. Mr. Mattos, Learned AGP appearing on behalf of Respondents 10 to 12, 14 to 16 and 20 states that the Respondent authorities are carrying on negotiations with Respondent No.18 in respect of the land in question being Survey No.37, Hissa No.5 in Village Oshiwara, Taluka Andheri, Mumbai Suburban District under Section 44(2) of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976. It is further stated that the Respondent authorities shall endeavour to complete the negotiations within two months from today and in case the negotiations do not succeed, the State PNP 2 WP48-23.8 Government will issue the notification under Section 41(1) of the MHADA Act within two months thereafter, on the report being submitted by the MHADA to the State Government. 2. Learned AGP submits that the Petitioner has nothing to do with the land in question. The above stand taken by the Respondent authorities is disputed by counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner. However, in this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, this Court is not required to go into the question of title. 3. Subject to the above clarification, the Petition is disposed of after recording the above statements and submissions. CHIEF JUSTICE (DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)