IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA THURSDAY, THE 17TH JUNE 2010 / 27TH JYAISTHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 3630 of 2010() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.251/10 OF KATTAKKADA POLICE STATION (S): PETITIONER:FIRST ACCUSED IN CRIME NO: 251 OF 2010 --------------------------------------------------------------------- SYAMLAL @ PAKKU, S/O SASI, PALELI MAMOODU VEEDU, THOTTAMBRA MURI, VEERANAKKAVU VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.P.SHINOD SRI.RAM MOHAN.G. RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT IN CRIME NO: 251 OF 2010 --------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AT THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.HEMA, J. ---------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.3630 of 2010 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 17th June, 2010. O R D E R This petition is for bail. 2. The alleged offence is under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. According to prosecution, at the instance of accused nos.1 to 3, the other accused (accused nos.4 to 6) committed robbery of Rs.2,04,000/- from the possession of defacto complainant, after causing hurt to him. Petitioner is the first accused. The incident happened on 3.5.2010 at about 10.50 p.m. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner was arrested on 5.5.2010 and he is in custody for the past 42 days. Even as per the case of prosecution, petitioner was not present at the scene and he was not involved in theft. The allegation is that he “co-ordinated” the commission of offence. Petitioner is aged only 19 years. Petitioner is not involved in any other crime. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that it was at the instance of petitioner and two others that the offence was committed. Taking into consideration the stage of investigation, he has no objection in granting bail. It is also conceded that BA NO.3630/10 2 petitioner is not involved in any other offence. 5. On hearing both sides, I am satisfied that bail can be granted to petitioner on conditions. Hence, the following order is passed : Petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court concerned, on the following conditions : (i) Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer on every Monday and Thursday between 10 a.m. and 1 p.m. until further orders. (ii) Petitioner shall not influence or intimidate any witness or tamper with evidence. (iii) In case the petitioner is involved in any offence of similar nature, his bail is liable to be cancelled. Petition is allowed. K.HEMA, JUDGE. tgs