WP(C) 3772/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. Ali, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Mary G ogoi, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department. For the order, which I pro pose to pass, it is not necessary to go into the factual details. Suffice it to mention that the petitioner claims to have been ap pointed as Assistant Teacher in different L.P. Schools of the State after their selection therefor. Her grievance is that though she is in service, she has not been paid his salary for the period May 1993 to August 2005. As his repeated req uests for payment of his salary has not evoked any result, he is before this cou rt for redress. After hearing the learned Counsels for the parties and noticing that the issue pertains to nonpayment of salary of the petitioner, this Court de ems it fit and proper to dispose of this petition in the same lines as in the ju dgment and order passed in a batch of writ petitions, the lead case being WP(C) 2147/99, Sudhendu Mohan Talukdar versus the State of Assam, disposed of by this Court on 6/4/2006. Ordered accordingly. The petitioner would take necessary step for getting his case re ferred to the Committee mentioned in the said judgment and order. No costs.