IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15756 of 2010 1. Kundan Kumar Mahto @ Kundan Mahton, 2. Chandan Kumar Singh @ Mahton, 3. Milan Kumar Mahton @ Milan Mahton, all sons of Harkhit Mahto, resident of Tilakur, P.S. Sultanganj, District- Bhagalpur. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.05.2010 Heard both sides. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Sultanganj P. S. Case no. 25 of 2010 under sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 504, 447 and 3/4 of the Explosive Substance Act. The allegation in the F.I.R. is that the petitioners and other two accused including one Jhun jhun Kumar Mahto went to informant’s Darwaja and started abusing him and that when the informant protested, the accused Jhun jhun Kumar (who is not amongst the petitioners) threw two bombs which exploded but nobody was injured because the informant hide himself inside the house. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused Jhun jhun Kumar Mahto has been allowed regular bail by the Sessions Court. It is also submitted that the land dispute is stated to be between the parties in the F.I.R. itself. It is also submitted that brother of the petitioners was murdered by the family members of the parties in which a Sessions trial was being conducted before the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Bhagalpur and the petitioners were doing pairvi on behalf of the prosecution and that, thereafter, the informant have been implicated the petitioners in this case. It is also submitted that there is no allegation on the petitioners 2 that they caused any assault. In the fact and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, namely, 1. Kundan Kumar Mahto @ Kundan Mahton, 2. Chandan Kumar Singh @ Mahton, 3. Milan Kumar Mahton @ Milan Mahton, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within the period of three weeks, are admitted to anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10, 000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bhagalpur, in Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 25 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (C.M. Prasad, J.) Ravi/-