1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.89 OF 2005 Arjunsingh Chainsing Raghuvanshi ..Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ..... Mr.Arvind S. Deshmukh, Advocate for applicant. Smt.Vaishali Shinde, APP for respondent. ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE,J DATE : 5th April, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard Mr.Arvind S. Deshmukh, learned Counsel for applicant and Smt.Vaishali Shinde, learned A.P.P. for respondent. Perused praecipe tendered by learned counsel for applicant in respect of speaking to minutes. 2. By the present praecipe, learned counsel for applicant seeks correction in para no.4 sub-para iv of the order dated 6th October, 2007 in word "extermination" which should be replaced by corrected 2 word as "enhancement". 3. The learned counsel also invited my attention to the order dated 16.12.2005 passed by this Court in which `notice of enhancement' was issued and same is discharged in the order dated 6th October, 2007 but wrongly stated as "extermination" instead of "enhancement". 4. It is apparent that by order dated 16.12.2005 `notice of enhancement' was issued and same was discharged by order dated 6th October, 2007, and therefore, in para No.4 sub-para iv of the order dated 6th October, 2007, the word `extermination' be deleted and same is replaced by word `enhancement' and said word be rectified and be read accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE) JUDGE gas/cra89.05