1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.11.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN W.P.(MD).No.13056 of 2011 And M.P.(MD).No. 1 of 2011 KR.Vellaisamy ... Petitioner -Vs- 1. The District Collector Trichirappalli District Trichirappalli 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Trichirappalli Revenue Division Trichirappalli 3. The Tahsildar Thiruverumbur Taluk Trichirappalli District 4. The Managing Director Tamil Nadu Housing Board Nanthanam Chennai ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to issue necessary direction to the second and third respondents to assign the patta to the land under the petitioner's possession, bearing Survey No. 310 situated at Navalpattu Village to an extent of 6 Acres, based on the petitioner's representation made to the first respondent, dated 15.03.2011. *** For Petitioner : Mr.K.Kannan For Respondents: Mr.Alaguthevan Special Government Pleader O R D E R The petitioner has come up with the above Writ Petition seeking a Mandamus to direct the first respondents to issue necessary directions to the third respondent to assign patta for a land claimed to be in possession of the petitioner. 2. Heard Mr.K.Kannan, learned counsel for the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3. Admittedly, the land was acquired by the Government long back for the purpose of a scheme floated by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board. The petitioner who was an encroacher was already evicted. The petitioner made a previous attempt by filing a Writ Petition in W.P.(MD).No. 1906 of 2005 without impleading the Housing Board with whom the land vested. Even according to the petitioner, the said Writ Petition was dismissed. Therefore, the petitioner has absolutely no right of title over the land. 4. Today, the claim of the petitioner is that the land has re- vested in favour of the Government and that, the Government should issue patta in his favour. But the said claim is highly farfetched and it cannot be entertained. Once a land has vested with the Housing Board, even if re-vested by the Government on the ground that it is not used by the Housing Board, the petitioner has no right. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Crl.Side) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The District Collector Trichirappalli District Trichirappalli 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Trichirappalli Revenue Division Trichirappalli 3. The Tahsildar Thiruverumbur Taluk Trichirappalli District 4. The Managing Director Tamil Nadu Housing Board Nanthanam, Chennai +1cc to Mr.K.Kannan, Advocate, Sr.No.40618 vsg ssk/29.11.2011 /6c -2p/- W.P.(MD).No.13056 of 2011 and M.P.(MD).No. 1 of 2011 17.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/