XV IN THE . HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF ‘CHHATTISGARH W.P. (Under Article 227) Noqy (2008 AT BILASPUR r10 PETITIONERS/ } Ratan Verman, S/o Kusaie Verman, Caste~ DEFENDANTS Namosudra, aged about 65 years, Occupation-Ag‘riculturist, Pratap Verman, $/o‘ Ratan Verman, Caste-Namoshudra, aged about 4O years, Occupation-Agriculturist, Nitai Verman, S/o Ratan Verman, Caste—Namoshudra, aged about L 35 years Occupation—Agriculturist, Lalo Verman, S/o Ratan Verman, CaSte—Namoshudga, aged about 25 years, Occupation-Ag riculturist, All Resident of Village— Ganeshpur, P.S. Jaynagar, Tahsil—Surajpur, District-Sarguja (C.G.) VERSUS :1. Satranjan, RESPONDENTS/ PLAINTIFFS S/o Ravlkant, aged about Namshudra, aged about 60 years, Occupation- Agrfcultu rist, Through Mukhtyar Dilip Kumar Bachhad, S/o Satranjan, aged about 40 Tahsil—Surajpur, District-Sarg uja (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through ; Collector, Sa’rguja, Ambikapurf District—‘Sarguja (C.G.) . , WRI (2) NM T PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 'Bini / @% ? 1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGA AT BlLAsPUR s;nqle Bench Hon‘bie Shn Jusuce Pralshant Kumar Mushta' Wrlt Petltlon [227) No 45 012008 v 1 Petit‘mn‘ers ' ‘ Ratan Ve n and others ‘ ‘ Versus J I Respor1§dents Satranjan and another ‘ l Shn A N Pandey, counse! for the petmoners Shn Sanjeev Agrawat Panel Lawyer for the State Wnt Petrtlon unggr Artlcie 227 of the Constrtutlon oi lndr 0 R A L O R D E R _ (18.01.2010) ) Heard on admission. (2) The petitioner is aggrieved [by theimpugned order. dated’w 17.08.2007, passed by Second Additional? District Judge (F.T.C.). ; Surajpur ,dismissirg the appeal tiled under Order 43, Rule 1(r) of the C.P.C.Vchalienging the grant of temporary injunction in favour of the piaintiff by the trial Court. (3) 0n the instruction from the petitioners, learned counsels for the -;’ petitioners Submits that the recording of evidence of plaintiff's witnesses have already commenced with the trial Court. (4) in view of the above and without commenting anything on merit,'it is directed that the trial Court shalt dispose of the suit within a period of six ‘ . months‘from the'dete of receipt of the copy of this order. (5) With this observation the writ petrtton stands disposed of l i Pr t ant Kumar Misha Judge . Sd/- x \ s f