c IN THE HIGH COURT QF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR H.C.C. No. |1'3^?2010(S.B.) ^WSB ^ (Arising out ofMA(Cj. No.400/2008 Hon'ble S.B.) .^i/ APPLICANTS APPELLANTS ^:- Vw-'" . A ••'*-'' y-" ^s®"" •rf NON-APPLICANTS 1) Rain Narayan Sahu S/o Bisouha Sahu aged about 35 years, (Driver) 2) Bisouha Sahy S/o Moti ram Sahu, aged about 60 years (Owner j 3) Anand Kumar Sahu S/o Bisouha Sahu, aged about 35 years, (Driver) All resident of Village Khanda, Police chouki : Lawan, PoUce Station Kasdol, Tahsil Baloda Bazar, District Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS 1) Ishwari Prasad Sahu S/o Padum Nafh Sahu, Aged about 56 years, (Died on 10/10/2009) if~^ 1(A) Janvi Kumar Sahu S/o Late Ishwari Prasad Sahu, aged about 32 years, 1(B) Narendra Kumar Sahu S/o Late Ishwan Prasad Sahu, aged about 19 years, ^^- n 2} Smt. Rambati Sahu Wd/o Late Ishwari Prasad Sahu Aged about 50 years, All are resident of Village Khanda, Police Station Kasdol, Tahsil Baloda Bazar, District RaipurfC.G.) 3} I.C.I.C.I. Lombard Insurance Company Limited, through Branch Manager, Lal Ganga Complex Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) APFLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF THE M.A.(C.) No. 400/2008 i o 'T^ "4i<<id^, ®ti1'y'i(o,f^diyy sn^r Traq? (l^^'i^) sn^v w f<-ii«k TISTT STT^T'gRT^ Sahu TOirwgf?g aii^i S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Ataarwal 11.03.2010 Shri CR Sahu, Advocate fo( Heard on IA No. 1 , applics filing the application. On due consideration, the is accordingly condoned. Heard on IA No. 2, High Court of Chhattisgarh Rules. On due consideration, the a|: Heard on application for resf:' Learned counsel appearin^ the counsel for the applicant coultl therefore, MA(C) No. 400/08t 10.012.2009, may be restored to On due consideration, applicants is succeeded in compliance, therefore, the 400/08 is restored to its original fi| A copy of this order be appeal and the same be listed for| chNlci'4ii ^i<i?if ^ f^l<i1 <[^f^i< ^StfipT 311^1 applicants. jtion for condonation of delay in ^pplication is allowed and delay applic|ation under Rule 125(1) of the iplication is allowed. ssfroration of MA (C) No. 400/08. for the applicants submits that not complied the court's order, which was dismissed on |ts original file. I a(n satisfied that the counsel for exrilaining the cause of his non- applic^tion is allowed and MA(C) No. fi|e. ^laced on record of the original |hearing after two weeks. Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge