U PefH'ioner PlainTiff HI5H COURT OF CHHATTI$GARH AT BILASFUR Wm? Pefrhon (227) No 3583 of 2010 Dhammpal @ Rnmkmpal aged abou‘r 21 years 5/0 Lafe shuvpai caste w Harizan (Chamar), R/o Villuge Kafgo’di, P.$. ¢& Tahsil Sonha'r, DisTtKoria’ " V (C.€v.) Verws 1. Manager SECL Charchu Wes? Colhar'y Tahsll Bmkun‘thpur Disff Karla - {CW 2. _ General Manager, S.E.C.L., Buikun‘rhpulf" area, DisfT.Kor-§a ($6.) Regional Commissioner, Con! {y‘xines Providem Fund, ShakTi Nngar“: Gup'reshwar, Jubalpur (M.P.) Bmnbh Managar Bhar‘nya Jeavan Beema Ntgam Branch Manendmgarh __ ~ \ Dlsf‘f Kama (C 6) 5. Sugniya Wfo Law Shivpai, aged abou‘r 45 years, R/o Viiiage Knfghodi,»-P.S. & Tahsil Sonhat, Disf‘rxoria (Ca) 6. Shanfi Bai W/o Shankar, aged abouf 50 year-s, R/o Viilage Khada, P.S.- & r Tahsil’ Baikunfhpur, Dis112Koria (C.6.) ?. Kun'ri Bai, 5/9 Bachhuram, W/a Shivcharah, aged abauf5’45 years, Rio Viihge Kafhofia, RS. & Tahs§l Mnnendmgarh, Disf‘hKor-ia (CE) 8. GenerqlPubEic 9. Brunch Manager 5mm Bank of India Branch Charcha Camery, Baikunfhpur Dls‘r‘r Karla (C 6) (Wrif Pe‘l'i‘l'ion under Ar'ricle 227 0f The Consii‘rufion of India) N (53: Hon‘ble Mr.T.P. Shawna.” m2_ ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 19* July, 2019 1. Heard on admission. 2 Learned counsei for The pefmoner submrrs +ha1’ responden‘r No 6 Wife of V iafe Shivpa! Is necessary wlfness f0 unfoid fhe rea! sfory Tha presen'r V ' pamoner has filed The appllcmion far- cailmg respanden‘r No6 asa wrmess m his supper? bu'r ‘H'Ie same has been IHegaNy dmmissed by 1he frlal Court 3. I have perused The peTiTion, order daTed 9.7.2010 passed by The Civil Judge Class-I, Baikunfhpur, in Suacession CaseVN973/2VOO6, appliea‘rion” for- caHing respondem- No.6 as a wifness. As per- ‘rhe applica‘fion responden‘r No 6 $ham'i Bai is a person who may un old fhe reai s‘rary Probabiy fhe pe‘h‘honer has no? shown her- name In has iist *o be filed m ‘ Terms of Order i6 Rule 1 of ‘rhe Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (In shor‘r “the Code'). 4‘ In suiTabie oases, The CourT is auThorized To permiT The parTy for calling t a person as a wifness whose name daes no'r find in The lis1’ submitfed or required under Rule 1 of Order 16, in 'rerms of Rule 3 of Order 16 of The Code. The case pending before fhe Cour‘r is summery proceeding relating To succession. 5. Considering The claim of The parTles 1T was approprIaTe for The CourT To Msummon such wrl'ness on behalf of 1'he pefmoner But nof perrmf'hng and summoning—fhe wnness, fhe Trial Cour? has commrr‘red allegalrry. 6. ConsequenTly, The peTiTion isallowed. Order impugned is hereby seT aside. The pefi‘rioner is permi‘r‘red To call respondenT No.6 ShanTi Bai as a wiTness on paymenT of process and expenses. No order as To cosTsy§\ ee a I ’:\ Sdl— .P. Sharmzi Judge $f ) , T ‘ x