73 1 CWPN02914of2010 C ln theHighCourt ofPuiljab and lIaryana at 1 Dateofdecisionll l l182Ol O JCWPN029140f2010 P e Vs StatcofHaryana andothers 2 CWP Noo427 of2009 1 0 0 KrishanKutnarand olhers Vs Stalc atlclotrs 0 Ca3 3 CWP No 3329of201 0 X RaibirSilghand othersVs Ste oana Jnd othcrs 0 X 4 CWP No1403 of2009 Z Prcln Slngh Vs Stateof IIarvanaanclothors 5r 5CWPN03401 of2010 r I1I1CKulbir Singhand anotherVs StateofHaryana and 011lcrs a5 6 CWP No 7536of201 0 03 KtiptanSinglo VsState and others 7 Z 7 CWP No203 of2010 Om Desh RaIandotllcrs Vs State and olhcrs 8 CWPN0 8147of2010 IilllC Ram Mehar and othersVs Statcofliaryana and othcrs 9 CWP No6443 of2009 C Jai Pal and anotherVs StateofIlaiyanuanclothors 100CWP N 6619 of2009 Satyawan EHC Vs State and otllers J1 CWP No 10487 of2009 Ilcad Constablc Ashok Kumar Vs State ofHaryanaand olhcrs 12 CWP No2237 of2009 Batra Amit 2014.03.20 14: 37 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 74 CWPNc2914of2010 2e NarenclerKumar Conable Vs State and ollhers 13 CWP No12248 of2009 Jit SinghEHC Vs Stale and otllers 14 CWPNo12253of2009 SubhashChanderEHC Vs State and otllers c 15 CWPNo16975of2009 3 0 Krishan Kulnar EHC Vs State andothcrs C3 16 CWP No18430 of2009 r 0 PannaLal EIiC Vs StateofHaiyana and others Rr 17 CWPNo18863of2009 Z RajKumar and anotherVs Stalc and others C 18 CWP No 18919of2009 e KainalParkashEIC Vs Stateofl4aryana and otllers 08 19 CWP No636 of2010 CO e LadyConstableRajbaa Vs Statoe and others 7 Z 20 CWPNo2775 of2010 CL Rishi ParshadandothersVseStatleofHaryana atld others 21 CWPN0 2875 of2010 LadyConstableSumanVs StateofHmyana alndotllcrs 22 CWP No2968 of2010 4 SadaRam EHC Vs State ofHaryailaand others 23CWP N03338of2010 KaptainSinghand another Vs StateofHaryanaand others 24CWP N033670f2010 EHC Mohan Lal Vs StateofHlryanaand others Batra Amit 2014.03.20 14: 37 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 75 CWP No9140 of2010 m3 25 CWP N03556 of2010 lIalnsRam and othersVs State aild otllcrs 26 CWPNoA258of2010 Hari KrishanHC Vs FinancialConmissioncrE Principal to GovernmentofHaryana and others 27 CWP NoA274 of2010 C 3 Amar SinghEHC Vs State and others 0 0 28 CWP NoA749 of2010 Z MohinderSinghEASI andailotherVs StateofHtliyaila and otllers C5 1X 29 CWP NoA765 of2010 Z CllhajuRain and anotherVs StatcofHaryana and otllers r2 30 CWP NoA960of2010 Ct c RajbirSillghand othersVs StateofHaryana andothcrs I 08 31 CWPNoA963 of2010 0 SatbirSinghVs StateofHaiyana and othcrs C W3 Z 32 CWPNo0923 of2010 3 Qm Jaivir Singhand othersVs Stote ad otlhers 33 CWPNo6031 of2010 Hardayal HC and othersVs StatcofHaryana alld otllcrs C2 CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE PERMOD KOIILI Presentl Ml SK Redhu Mrikram SinghMrSN Yadav l2511shMalik MiPritam Saini Mturcildei Imba MrlUO SinghAdvocotesfor the pctitioners MrRS Kundu Addl AG Haryanaforthe respondcnts P33RMODKOHLI J Batra Amit 2014.03.20 14: 37 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 76 1 CWP N02914 of2010 em4 0 l3 On the basisof comnoon andidentical1SSuesboth on factsand Iaw all these are beingdecidedbythis common odere The entire controvcrsyrelatesto the of Rule 137 ofthe PunjabPolice Rules 1934 as to the Stateof Haryana and ameildedvide PunjabPolice Hatyana Rules 2001 1Q referredto as he Rules This rule relatcs to for 0 Lower SchoolCourseand for of the eligiblcofflccrs ln List Bml C3 for their protnotionThe amendedrule subjectmatter of debatein the C 0 present writ petitionsis hercunder1 r 137mSclecll011of candidatesfor admission to Z 41 courses at thc Police TrainingCollcgell ist CE B in Forin 379shall be mailltaiiled by cach of Police It shall include the 08 CQ names of all constablesselected for admissloll et V3 to the Lower School Coursc to be hcld a thc Z 3 CL Police TrainingCollegeSelectlion to thc listB shalloe made lll the month of Januarycach 1 yearand shall be limitcd to the numbcrof seats allotted to tllc clistrict for thc year Tlle number r of seats in Lower School Course Ill a yearsllall be on the basis of existingvacancies and the vacancles likclyto bc created witllioilonc year In the respcctiveunit 55010 of tllc seats allotted to a unit in the Lower School Course shall bc filJed in on thc basis of a coinpetitive Batra Amit 2014.03.20 14: 37 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 77 CWPN02914 of2010 5 1 examination35A Oll the basisof Cutlefitlness and 10Io oil the basisof COllSlsteilt in Gold or SilverA4edalill All lndia Police 1 MeetINationalGamesor displayof C braveryduringthc course of of 0 3 official duty Selectionofpersoils against55Io t5 seats lll listllowci school Orl the basisof nlerit X shall be done by a e Z Committee011tllc basisof L 4 1 Examnationof servicesand c 08 2 A tcst called I 03 7 test9 1111 Z Oa a Prade b1Law andpracticalpolicework and 3 An IntervieWe Ce 2 0 All constables of llheir educational shall bc eligibleto appear for Bel test if theyare Ullderthe age of 35 years and have completed5 vcars of servtce on 1 day of Januaryof tlle yeor 111 which selectioil is made However ifa Batra Amit 2014.03.20 14: 37 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 78 CWP No2914 of2010 e constable to reserved category who is recruitedafter the agc of 27 yearsas per Govermnentinstrucioilslordcrs then he shall be allowcd to appear for 1Tlllllmum three consecutivc chnnccs after 0 of flve ycarsofservicc cven ifhe 0 C has crossed the age of 35 ycars up to a of 10years C5 2 4 Z iil All Coilstables of their t educational shall be eligible lO t e C be Oll ListI3 CUlll Illerit 08 basis if thcyare Under the age of 40 years CQ and have 5 yearsof scrvice on the m Z P0 flrst dayof Januaryof thc yclll lll wllich Cle selectionis inade 99 The Stateof Haryanaissuedinstructionsdatcd 13022007 the lnlllllllUlll ment to full5ll the criteria for seniority 1 Clllllmfitllessrelyinguponthe observalionsof this Court in the caseof C Naresh Kumar Vs State of Harvaila and othersCWP No7952 0 20041decided Oll 051 1 004 Director General of Police Ilryana issued llhese instructi oils prescribing bench marks for selection to 1321list under 350Ioquota Thc relevallt extract of the lllStrucllons dated 13022007 Antlexure 179 in CWP No6427 of Batra Amit 2014.03.20 14: 37 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 79 CWPN029140f2010 e7n 2009 is hereunderl 3 In vicw ofthe 1IonbleIiighCourl in the Naresh Kumar case suprc it has bcell decidedto fix the benchmarksfor Otnessunder 35Io quota The r assessment Of Servicerecord should be made 0 0 Oll the basis of educatioil tminiilgcourses C passedcOnmcndatiollcerlioOcalesand X of service ctc as givenin PPR 137 All the Z candidateswho obtall a ininimum 31 marks r 0 or nlore would be deemcd to bc flt for c selection of B l seats against35YoqUotaon the a5 basis of inteese senlorilyof the alld C nv for all suchcaildidatesinterese Would Z be the sole criteria for on their turil Oa under 35Io quota111Vlew of the explicitorder of Hgh Court Please takc furthcr nccessary action 99 The validityof these has beenupheldbythis Court in Hawa SinghVs StateofHaryanalnd othells CWP Nol 194 14052008 There are three sets of writ petitiotlSunder consideratlOlle The saome are broadlycategorised in tlle following mallllCrl a1 the eligibilityofthe candidatcswho appeared in 55Io merit Batra Amit 2014.03.20 14: 37 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 80 J CWPN029140f2010 8 l 1 promotionquotaunderRule 137 to bc considcred for pronlotion undeor35 oll basis ullder ru3 137 21 il even if theyhavefailed under 55Ioquota bl consideratioilofthe candidateswith Iessthall 35 yearsof age lIS on Ist dayof January of the year in which seleclliollIS lnade in 35Io 1 C quotaof 3 Cl C C J Jnterse seniorityofthe candidates Oll the basisof bench marks I 111termsof DGPs dated l022007 45 Frolll thereading ofRule 137 ll it emeorges EISfollows e Z a that 55Io of the scats allotted to a unit Ill the Lower School t Course are meant to be Olled Ill Oll tllc basis of C examination 08 Ob9 350Ioofthe seats on thc basis and CQ er c l 10Io seats on tlle basis of consistent W2 111 Z 2 Ll Selection agaillst55Io quota IS to bc made by tllc PromotionalColnInittee All the constables oftheir educationalqtialicationwho are Iessthan 35 ycarsof ageand have 5 yearsof serviceOll IstdayofJanuary of the year of C selection are eligibleto appear for Bl test under mer seats of 55Io quota Similarly all thc constables of their educationalqualificationhalringcomplctedflve years ofservice and 111 the age of 40 years on the Ist dayof Januatyof thc year of selection Batra Amit 2014.03.20 14: 37 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 81 J CWPNo914of2010 e are eligibleto be brought on Iist Iel on the basisof seniorityim oinerltagainst 350Ioquota Sportspersons under 10Io quota arc to bc considered subjectto eligibility lll 1hc abovc two categories 1Cr The controversyrelating to thc eligibilityofthc candidates 5 0 who failed to secure the merit in the examination C under 55Io quota to be agalll considered under 350Io C5 I inent quollacameto be consideredby a Division 13encllof this Court 4C Z Ill Naresh Kumars case 6supnIlThis Division Bench judgment was t before the Honblc Court lll SpecialLeave 10 Q e AppealCivil9No10409 of2005 which hasbcen dismissedin limine 2C 08 on10052005 r7 A similar issue came up fot considerationbef lhis Court m Z 111 lhc case of Hawa Singh Vs Stateof HElryanaand others VP tlle No1194 of20051 decidedon 14052008 Aller adlssion ofthe writ petitionbythe Honble Divisioil Bench tlle inalller was consideredbya 1 learnedSingleJudgeofthis Court for flnai disposaon 292006 1 The learnedSlngleJudgeofthis Court was ofthe opinionthat certain C prOVolSlonsof Rule13 ofthc to tlhenotice of the Division Bench and Oll that basis a rcference was made for consideration of the writ pctitionand other connected matters by a Division Bench of this Court The aforesaid writ petitioncame to be heard by a Division I3enchofthis Court Thc 171011blc IMvision Bench Batra Amit 2014.03.20 14: 37 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 82 CWPN0914 of2010 0e f 1 vide its judgmentdated 14052008 afSnned tlle ralo in Naresh Kumars case sujoral withthefollowing obscrvatiollSl In view of the facts inentioncd above these writ petltionsare allowcd in the same tenns as 111 Naresh Kumars casc supra9 The 1 lr are directed 10 dcputethe 0 C petitioncitlto the first Lowcr School Course which will conlmence a11ertllc pronouncement 5 2 of judgment 1ll this casc IIowever The e Z petitioirshallbc deelned to hlivc 111 r the Lowcr School Course froln thc date when 0 Ct X othet cotlstableshave qualied whose names 045 were approvedlo Ulldergo Lower School CQ Course vide selectlisll Anllexurc Pml I is madc 7 Z 13 clear that if by getting date of r passingtile Lower School Course the Petitioncrbecameeligiblcfor then hc will get only deeincd benclts without getting anyactual flnancial bcnefits in view of C principleof tlo work no pay as laid clown by their ordshipsof thc Honblc Court in Union of India and another vs Tarsem Lal and others 62006910 SupremcCourt Cases 1450 17 Batra Amit 2014.03.20 14: 37 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 83 0 CWPNo9140f2010 ell Hoonblethe Division Bench furtherconsideredthe validityof theinstructionsdated13022007and uphcldits validitywith thefollowing observatiotlSl So far as CWP N03609 of 2007 is concemed In that writ petltionselecll ist to 1Cr Lowcr School Course on the basisof iinstructlOllS 0 dated 1 022007 as referred10 above has been C4 As has been held earlier abovesaid I C9 instrucllOilsare perfectlyjustifiedand are in Ic consonance wilohtohedlrectlolls issued by lhis Z 5t Courtin NareshKumarscase supral 91 2 Cr The claims of some of the wiit for t0 e I Lower School Course have becnrejected on the groundthalotheyhaving c15 failedin 550Iomerit quotaare ilot cntitled to beconsidercdfor beingbrougl1t 00 4r on List Bel in 35Io quota llle claimsofsolne ofllhc writ have m Z been for beingbrought in List Bmlunder 35Ioquotaon theground t1 that theywere of less than 35 yearsof age as on Ist dayof Jonuaryofthe year of selection In some cascs the claimshave been rcjcctcdfor non 1 the lnmlllllilln 31 bench marksin terms ofthc DGPs instructions dated 13022007 In Naresh KlllllarS case supral thc Honble Division 6e Bench ruled the eligibilityofthe constables for their consiclcration both lll 55oand 35Ioquota Thisjudgment has attained fillality The SLP has also been dislnissed by the Honble SupremeCourt lllc ratio of the said judgInenthas been reiterated Ill Hawa Sing cases SUpral as also in Constable Dhannbir Vs Stateof Harvanaancl others 20019 RSJ 310 wherein thefollowingobservationshave beeninade Batra Amit 2014.03.20 14: 37 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 84 CWPN02914 of2010 12 13e So thereare thrce distinct calcgories vlith their own 811d for fOr considcration T1cre 1S 110 bar to considerationof a constablein any catcgoryif he fUlfills theeligibility Criteriai if he is 111 1 C all three he has 0 stotutoryrigllt to mo 0 considerattollill all threecalegoriesThe Rules C 3 do not categorize Or reqU1r0SOille age C5 for eligibility under any oftlhecategoriesWllat it J2 c specifies is thc upperagcloilnil1for cotlsidcration Z undera category 2 L these instructions Ccrtain 1SSUCS refred to 4 X hcreinabove have againcropped The controversy up the O8 O3 eligibility ofcandidatesunder35 yearsofagcfor beingbrought on List 1 tC 7 for 35Io quota againcame up for considerationbyanotherDivisioil Bcncll Z 7 ofthis Court in Dhannbirs case 6supral and Balrai Singhand othcrs Vs L1 Statc004arvanind others 2009 29RSJ 46 In Dharinbirscase supral 17 a DivisionBctlchofthis Court hed as ulldcrl 17 A conjointrcadingof botll thc 000100101111000 suberuleswould show that onlytheupperage Iimit m has been prescribed under the rules and 110 mlnimum age has been prescribedeither undcr subule 26i9 or submrulc2 ii which means thnt lfa constable llilOlls the requirement ofthe upller age and the other qunlillcationsprescribedundcr the respectivecategoryas per subeiulc 2 1hereIS Batra Amit 2014.03.20 14: 37 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 85 CWP No2914 of2010 e13 l 110 bar to his considerationunder each of theIn Meaningthereby a constablewho is cligible111 one categoryundeiRule 137 can also be consideredin the othercategoryundcr Rule 133 29 il of the PunjabPolice Rulcs as thereIS 110 1 0 bifurcation bctween thc rules as far as the 0 eligibilitylS COllCClOllCdwith regordto the Ca miniinum age as nonc is prescribed 3 C5 18 The mlniiuulin age if bywoyof executive i nstructions Would go agaillSt te Z 5r interest of the Constables who are otherwise 0 eligibleunder the statutoryRules Rule 133 X oil confers a rightwhich a ConstablcattainsOll oll the basisof his scniority lll the service As and 4 17 whenhis turn comcs basedon the senioritv a rigllt 2 0 to considerationdevolveson him This rightOll 0m thebasisofhis seniority cannot be on llhc basis of executive instructions This would be ln contravention to tlle statutoryrulesand thcrefore C TlOtsustainablc 22 What emerges from the above discussions 1S that a constable who has completed5 years of servlce on the Ist day of Januaryof the ycar tn which the selection is inadc is undcr the age of 35 years and is cligiblc for consideration ond seleclion for includinghis name in List B l of Batra Amit 2014.03.20 14: 37 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 86 CWPN02914of2010 14e l selectedconstablesfor admissionto ower School Courseunderthe 55IoquotaOll thc basisof inerit as per Rule 137 2I09ofthe Punjab Police Ru 1934 and having 111the coinpcti tive test and failed Of was unable et 1 enlistmentduc lo lower tnerit can also ciaim C CO consideratioon and selectionunderllhe3Io quota CS3 on the basis of as per Rulc X C5 137 2I oil if hc IS eligibleunder botll the 2E Cr Z As noticed above the constablcswho have attained lllllllmum C 3 1 bench marksunder 35Io quotahave becnignoredEllldtheirjuS Were dcputed to the course on the groundthat thcyare nlOre lllCrltOrlOllS llllVlllg c bctr bench marks This issue is in fact covered under Nilresh Kumars CO Acr case supraJand came to be clariftcd in Balrai Sinhs cass supral 7 Z whercin it has been held that wbereeever a juniorhas becndeputedfor 0 Lowcr SchoolCourse ignoringthe claiin ofthe scniorsnerely on tllc busis ofthe higherbcncllmarks thesenior be deputcd for thc coursc and hewill 17 be deeInedto have passed the course from the datehisjunioihusqualifled 1ll sucll sittiation senior will retainhis seniority P There is another aspectof the matter The DGPs instructions dated 13022007 are onlyprospective ln nature Prior to theseinstrtictions no bcnch marks wcre prescribedunder tlle statutoryrules and tllus 011 those conslables who acquiredeligibilttyprior to issuance of these instructionshave been denied the deputlation to the Lower School Coursc for non achicving the rninimuin bench marks It is settled Iaw that Batra Amit 2014.03.20 14: 37 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 87 CWPN02914of2010 1 15 y govcmlnentinstructions canilot overrulethe statutoryrules 1Ilus tllesc instructionscannot be pressed into serviccto deprive theconstablcsoftheir rightfor for not havingachievccltheininimum benchJnarks8S under these lnstructions issued later llhus such of the coilstablcswhobecaineeligiblepriorto issuanceoftheseinstructionsand 1 Ct ignored for not achieving the lnlllilnum bcnchInarksarc to be for 3 0 Lower SchoolCourse and on successful ofthc coursc theyare CA to be treated senior than their juniorswho werc carlier deputcd to the I C5 Lowcr SchoolCourse In otherwords theywill retnin their seniorityfot C 4 beingbroughll on List Bel 1hattheywere dcputedfor the Z course Iaterthanthieir juniors or theydid not achieveminllllUm bencll Lr rnarks cll Similarly such ofthe constableswho arc ignorcdon occount A5 of achicvingIessthan the bench marks thentheirJlllllOrS OrC Q0 4 also cntitled to bedeputed to the coursc andon oftlle same will 7 Z rctain thcir seniority over CL ln some of the writ petitionstlle constablcshvc complctcd1he Lower School Course but thcy have been dclliccl the 17 OVCr their juniorsOll the ground that tlle juniorswere eithcr havingbetterbench marks or deputed for thc course prior in tiinc thim the Ce wrlt pctltIoners ln view of the above observations thesewrit petitioners shall be dceined to be senior to theirjuniorsdeputcclcarlicr on account of better bench marks or on any other groundof eligibility To suln up thesc pctitiotls ateedisposedofwith the followingdirecllionsa iJ Such ofthc who have failed in 550Ionlerit quota Batra Amit 2014.03.20 14: 37 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 88 CWPN02914of2010 16 cv arcentitledto beconsideored for beingbrought on List B 1 undcr 35Io quota Oll the ptincipleof providedtheyhavcthe requisite andare otherwiseeligible underthe rules iil such ofthe coonstables who were lessthan35 yearsofageas on thc day oftheir considerationbut not nlore than 40 years thcywill be eiltitlcd to be 1OC brought on List Bl by themto Lower SchoolCourse 9 0 iiil thc petitioners who eligibilitypriorto the DGPs instructiotlS Ce1 datcd 13022007 will be for the course witllout the X 0 quesonof lniniinum bench marks as prcscribedunder thc govcrnlnent m instructIOllSand 111 their cases senioi and other eligibilitycriterlo Z C undertherules will be enough for tlleir to thecourse l ivl thepetltioners who becameeligiblcfor aRer the lSSlIEIllCCof 4 t the instructionsdated13022007 and have achieved the lninimum bcnch 08 marks be deputedto the course their juniorshavc bettcr OQ 4c benchmarks 3 Z 0 vl interse scniorityof the constableswill be determinedon the basisof l their scniority in theirrespective districtsin thc tuldIlOt tlll tlle basisof passingof the Lower School Coursc 111all such cases who arc 1 ignored by tlle above directions However the interse selliorityof constableswill not be governed by theabove directionswhere seIllOl WUS 4e ignoredon accounl of pendencyof any disciplinaiyproceedings or who suffercd ally otller disqualiflcallon for deputation to Lowcr School Course vil deputationof the shall be lnade on the basis of thclr seniorityin thcir respective districts and againstthe available vacancies Let the clahn of thepetitioners be considered in the lightof the above directions and their deputationwhereveverrequired be made in Batra Amit 2014.03.20 14: 37 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 89 1 CWPN029140f2010 17 e r accordancewiththeabovedirections A copy of thisorderbe placed on therecordof eachconnccted Ole r6 ee 11082010 4S PERMOD KOHL I3LS JUDGE C t 3 0 Notel Whetherto bereferredto the YES C t 4 X 1c Z t 4 c6 00 e2r Z 23 CL 1 1 Batra Amit 2014.03.20 14: 37 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document