IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40663 of 2010 1. LALIT CHANDRA YADAV, S/0- BHOLA PRASAD YADAV 2. BHOLA PRASAD YADAV @ BHOLA YADAV, S/O- LATE RAM KISHUN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 04.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners seek their bail in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 254 of 2010 registered under Sections 302, 326, 307/34, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. As per Fardbeyan of the informant at the time of the alleged occurrence, petitioner no. 1 was armed with fire arm and it is alleged that when informant reached near the place of occurrence, he found his son, Mithilesh Kumar writhing in pain having fire arm injury and the petitioners along with First Information Report named accused persons were standing there. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, as a matter of fact, petitioners have falsely been implicated on account of previous enmity which is evident from perusal of Annexure-2 of this bail petition. Enmity cuts in both ways. So, I am not at all satisfied with the above stated submission. Since petitioner no. 2 is said to be an order-giver and he was unarmed at the time of alleged occurrence, petitioner no.2, namely, Bhola Prasad Yadav @ Bhola Yadav is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in 2 connection with above stated Supaul P.S. Case No. 254 of 2010. So far as prayer for bail of petitioner no. 1, namely, Lalit Chandra Yadav is concerned, the same stands rejected. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)