IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH APRIL 2007 / 20TH CHAITHRA 1929 WP(C).No. 4008 of 2006(B) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ PADMAVATHY, KRISHNA, T.C.17/465 KAILAS NAGAR, POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.LAL GEORGE RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE MANAGER, MUTTATHARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.T.413 VALLAKKADAVU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. B. SWARNAMMA, PANAYIL VEEDU, TC.43/1014, MUTTATHARA, VALLAKKADAVU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV: SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON ADV: SRI.VINOD KUMAR FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No. 4008 of 2006 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS Ext.P1: True copy of the loan closure receipt in loan No. CSF/OL 75/95 dated 5-1-2006 Ext.P2: True copy of the request letter issued by the petitioner to the 2nd respondent Ext.P3: True copy of the representation submitted by the Petitioner to the 1st respondent 17-6-2005 Ext.P4: True copy of the letter issued by the 2nd respondent to the 1st respondent dated 20-6-2005 Ext.P5: True copy of the representation dated 6-1-2006 submitted by the petitioner to the 1st respondent Ext.P6:True photocopy of the Letter No.MSB/2555/06-07 //True copy// es THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN.J ------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 4008 of 2006 & I.A. No.5095 of 2007 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of April 2007 JUDGMENT The petitioner is a retired employee of the 1st respondent. His D.C.R.G. was withheld on account of certain demands of the 2nd respondent co-operative bank. Ext.P6 produced along with I.A.5095/2007 shows that the entire claim of the 2nd respondent has been satisfied. In the aforesaid circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing that the retiral benefits of the petitioner shall be released after taking note of Ext.P6. That will be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is clarified that unless the 2nd respondent has already issued direct communication to the 1st respondent or any of its officers, the 2nd respondent will also be given a notice by the 1st respondent before final action is taken on the basis of this judgment . THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN JUDGE es