IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 16 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 782 OF 2009 SAIDA KHATOON & ORS. .. PETITIONERS Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & Ors. .. RESPONDENTS Mr. Vaibhav Sugdare i/b Ashok Mishra for the petitioner Mr. Milind More AGP CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & SMT. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 12th March, 2010 P.C. On 4th December, 2009, the present writ petition was disposed of by us observing that there is an alternative remedy available to the petitioners under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971. We observed that it was, therefore, not possible to entertain the petition. The petition was disposed of. 2. Pursuant to the order passed by this court, the petitioners filed an appeal before the Administrator and Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Division, Mumbai. The Administrator and Divisional Commissioner Konkan Division observed that he has only limited jurisdiction and the issue involved in the petition appears to be beyond his jurisdiction. He, therefore, disposed of the appeal. 3. In view of this review is sought of our order dated 4th December, 2009. It is not possible for us to review the order because the Additional Administrator and Divisional Commissioner has not stated that he has no jurisdiction but he has stated that he has limited jurisdiction. In view of this it will be open to the petitioners to file comprehensive petition raising all issues including issues which they had raised in the writ petition. We had not considered the merits of the case of the petitioners when we passed the order of which review is sought. 4. The review petition is disposed of. (SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.) (SMT. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)