'/ 'w -y HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BIL^SPUR F.A.Ko.225/2005 HOH'BLE SHM JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR 8INHA & HOyBLE SHRI JUSTICB T.P.SHARMA. APPELLANT RESPONDENT Siat. Diteshwari Bai Rajak w/o Dev Kumar Rajak aged about 28 years, Throiigh Nafhuram Ninnatkar @ Sadurani Nirmalkar R/o. Mamtanagar, bchind fhe Distri.et Court Rajnandgaon Tahsil & District Rajuaiidgaon(CG) , Versus Dev Kuinar Rajak S/o Makhanlal Rajak ayd about 30 years, R/o Old Amapara Mohaaagar, Durg TahsS. & Distridt Dutg(CG) APPEAL UNDBR SECTION 19 OF THE FAMILY COURTS. AC"F Appearance : Shri Basaat Dewangan, Advocate appears on behalfofShri Anup Majunidar, counsel for the appeUant. Sbri Bittu Nag, counsel for the respondent. ORM. ORDBR (19.12.2008} The following order of this Couit is passed by Mnha.J. Heaid. Leamed counsel for fhe appellant siibmits that since the matter has beea^ coiiipromised, he is not prRssing fhis appeal and the appealshould be disniissed as notpressed, Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not preased. Sd/- SuaU Kumar Sinha Judge B^^ZV^ Sd/- T.p. Sharma judge