1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.07.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA Criminal Original Petition(MD) No.8688 of 2011 N.Bharathi .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Karur. 3.The Inspector of Police, Karumandapam Police Station, Trichy District, Trichy. 4.The Inspector of Police, Mayanoor Police Station, Karur District. 5.The Inspector of Police, Somarasampattai Police Station, Trichy District, Trichy. .. Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondent Nos.3 to 5 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.07.2011 and to give adequate police protection to the petitioner and her Husband namely K.Murugadass and her husband's parents for their life and liberty within the time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner :Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For Respondent :Mr.K.V.Rajarajan Govt.Advocate(Crl.Side) O R D E R The petitioner approaches this Court with a prayer to direct the respondent Nos.3 to 5 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.07.2011 and to give adequate police protection to the petitioner and her Husband namely K.Murugadass and her husband's parents for their life and liberty within the time frame fixed by this Court. 2. Today, the petitioner, her husband and the parents of the petitioner are present before this Court. The 1st and 2nd respondents also appeared in person. The 2nd respondent would submit that he has received the telegram dated 11.07.2011 only on 13.07.2011 and on verification, neither the petitioner nor her husband are available in the place and hence, he was not able to provide protection. 3.The 1st respondent, who appeared in person also would submit that on receipt of the representation on 13.07.2011, they made an enquiry, where the petitioner's parents are living and they had not made any sort of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 threat against the petitioner, her husband and his family members. 4.The parents of the petitioner, who appeared before this Court would submit that they never threat the petitioner and they are away from the petitioner, her husband and his family members and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 5.Considering the submissions made by the 1st and 2nd respondents and in view of the endorsement made by the parents of the petitioner, I am inclined to dispose of the application with a direction to the 2nd respondent, the Superintendent of Police, Karur District to consider the representation i.e. telegram dated 11.07.2011, which was received on 13.07.2011 and pass appropriate orders, if necessary, give adequate police protection to the petitioner, her husband and his family members. 6.With the above direction, this criminal original petition is disposed of. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (W) /True copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Karur. 3.The Inspector of Police, Karumandapam Police Station, Trichy District, Trichy. 4.The Inspector of Police, Mayanoor Police Station, Karur District. 5.The Inspector of Police, Somarasampattai Police Station, Trichy District, Trichy. 6.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1. CC to Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, Advocate, SR.No. 23659 Arul Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8688 of 2011 19.07.2011 TR : 29.07.2011: 2p/8c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/