IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.96 of 2010 1. SHIBAN SAO 2. Tuni Sao @ Tunni Sao 3. Pappu Sao 4. Munna Sao Versus 1. The STATE OF BIHAR 2. Sangita Devi ------ 2/ 03.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. In the case finding corroboration of demand of a motorcycle and cash of Rs. 50,000/- conviction awarded by the Trial Court is confirmed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.5, Nalanda. In appeal only sentences has been reduced one year imprisonment for petitioner no.1 and four months rigorous imprisonment for rest of the petitioners with fine of Rs. 2,000/- for Shiban Sao and Rs. 500/- for rest of the petitioners. It appears that no violence causing any injury of person of the victim girl appeared in the case. All the allegations are oral but main difference was with the husband whose sentenced for a period of one year rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 2000/- but he remained in custody for a period of more than 18 months specifically from 22.09.2005 to 24.11.2005 and again from 23.03.2007 to 22.09.2008 even then rest of the family members including father-in-law and younger brother-in-laws’ petitioners suffered imprisonment after their custody before filing of the revision, while they had no hand at all in torture. Now, under the discussed circumstances, it is submitted and prayed by the learned counsel to minimize the sentence for the 2 period undergone, though that is within one month. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, the revision application is disposed of. Let the order be communicated to the trial court through F.A.X. at the cost of the petitioners in connection with Complaint Case No. 870C of 2003 and T.R. No. 993 of 2008 in the Court of S.D.J.M., Nalanda at Bihar Sharif. Shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)