1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION NO.381 OF 2009 Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Sena ..Petitioner. Vs. Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane District and others ..Respondents. .... Ms. Sonali Humane i/b Ms. R.J. Todankar for the Petitioner. Ms. L. S. Desai i/b Mrs. Pallavi Divekar for Respondent No.1. Mr. P.M. Palshikar for Respondent No.3. .... CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 12th March, 2009. P.C. : 1. Counsel appearing for Respondent No.1 submits that they have already considered the application of the Petitioner and has forwarded the same to the State Government for further action. 2. Counsel appearing for the State submits that they would examine the application and dispose of the same in accordance with law expeditiously. The Respondents will abide by the statement. In view of the statement made, nothing survives in the writ petition. The 2 same is accordingly disposed of as having become infructuous at this stage. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.