© \y\/ IN THE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition N0.'^^<'''-t. /2006 S£RV 1 C E-BflASSER PETITIONER DEVENDRA KHAPEKAR L- /-^ ..•f'.J^:y • -MM-/ ....--:s^;:"" <^y^'~ . l^^.--" •T- RESPONDENTS aged about 35 years S/o. Shri M.B.Khapekar Designation- Investigator (Met) Small Industries Service Institute Ministry of Small Scale Industries Governmenf of India KURLA - Andheri Road, Sakinaka MUMBAI -400072 • Permanent Address : Behind Amdi Jain Temple Ward No. 16, Quarter No.251 Malviya Nagar, Durg (C.G.) 491001 VERSUS : 1 U N l ON OF INDIA Through : Secretary '<y' Ministry of Small Scale Industries Government of India Office of Development Commissioner (Small Scale Industries) Nirman - Bhawan NEW-DELHI 110011 2. THE COLLECTOR Durg , District D^g (C.G.) ^ // 2 // 3 SHRI DHARAMAVEER SHARIVIA Deputy Collector. Durg (C.G.) 4. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI) Through : Director General C.B.I.- NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA •^.-^ 1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION N0.4704 OF 2006 Devendra Khapekar Versus Union of India & Others (Writ Petition underArticles 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri V.G. Tamaskar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Fouzia Mirza, Asstt. Solicitor General for the Union of India. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adv. General forthe State. Shri Pallav Mishra, Advocate for the respondent No.3. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 23rd day of June,2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that with the passage of time the petition has become infructuous and nothing survives for adjudication. 2. No objection from other side. 3. It is ordered, as prayedfor. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. ' —-— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gowri '^tf^S^^S^^^-^T^KSWfy-'^^-'^^^^vsssSS^^Q^^