1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2964 OF 2010. Swargiya Vinaykumar Parashar Yuvakkrida Vyayamshala. -: VERSUS :- Assistant Charity Commissioner, Akola and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JULY 19, 2010. Heard Shri U.N. Vyas, learned counsel for petitioner and Shri Sonare, learned A.G.P. for respondent no.1. Because applicant wanted to withdraw his application in Enquiry No.661/2009, respondent no.1 has directed Inspector under him to enquire and report. Shri Vyas, learned counsel contends that such delegation is not permissible and the proceedings of enquiry report ought to have been continued further. Shri Sonare, learned A.G.P. argues that no prejudice is caused to the petitioner. 2 It is apparent that only report has been called for by the office of respondent no.1. Petitioner can raise all his objections before that Authority at appropriate time. In view of this, I do not find any legal right of petitioner violated at this stage. Shri Vyas, learned counsel has further stated that the proceedings are being unnecessarily delayed. Respondent no.1 to call for the report by 31.08.2010. In view of above discussion, Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.