IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1535 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3381 OF 2008 W I T H CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1538 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8788 OF 2007 W I T H CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1539 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8804 OF 2007 Ansari Raeesa Abdul Majid & Ors. .......Applicants V/S. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation for the City of Bhiwandi, Nizampur and Ors. ........Respondents ------- Mr.S.U.Dhakephalkar, adv.for applicants. Mr.R.S.Apte, Senior Advocate for respondents no.1 and /Corporation. Mr.P.I.Khemani, AGP for respondent-State. CORAM : J.N.PATEL, & : SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATED : 22ND SEPTEMBER 2009. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This court has sufficiently protected the interest of the petitioner by its interim order. The learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that, the respondents are inviting fresh application and appointing Shikshan Sevaks which will adversely affect the rights of the petitioner. We do not think that the apprehension expressed by the petitioner appears to be correct. The petitioner s’ right is already protected by the interim order. It is open for the petitioner s to ’ get their petitions heard expeditiously. Therefore, we do not think that any further orders are required to be passed in the matter of the impugned advertisement. The Civil Applications are therefore rejected. [J.N.PATEL, J] [ SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J]