IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3978 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.M.PANCHAL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- NALINKANT D KAJITHIA Versus STATE OF GUJ -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PV HATHI for Petitioner MR A.J.DESAI Asst. Govt. Pleader for MR HV CHHATRAPATI for Respondent No. 1, 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE J.M.PANCHAL Date of decision: 18/02/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed to direct the State Government to transfer to him by sale or on hire purchase basis, the quarter occupied by him in five bungalows, Gulbai Tekra, Ahmedabad. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions states that the petitioner has vacated the premises in question and as the petition has become infructuous, it may be disposed of accordingly. 3. As the petitioner has vacated the premises occupied by him, now it is not necessary to consider the relief claimed in the petition. The petition having become infructuous deserves to be disposed of accordingly. Rule is therefore discharged with no order as to costs. Ad interim relief granted earlier is hereby vacated. The petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. kks