IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31231 of 2010 SANJEEV JAISWAL son of Baidya Nath Prasad Jaiswal----------Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 11.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Landlord and landlady came and tried to dispossess the informant, husband was also present there, in the meantime this petitioner, a client of the informant, came and tried to commit rape upon her by inserting a stick in the private part of the informant. She was assaulted and legs were tied. Her ornaments were snatched. Her household articles were taken away from house. If differences really were there in between the wife and husband, landlord and landlady may join to vacate such tenant but the abovementioned act constituting offence under sections 376/511 of the Indian Penal Code appears doubtful on the allegation for refusal of anticipatory bail of this petitioner. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Buddha Colony P.S. case no.69 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J.)