bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1212 OF 2008 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1212 OF 2008 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1212 OF 2008 IN IN IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 350 OF 2006 EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 350 OF 2006 EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 350 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 4104 OF 2002 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 4104 OF 2002 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 4104 OF 2002 Anil Bhaskar Ghagare ... Plaintiff v/s Pradeep Shankar Shede ... Defendant Mr.Sunil Mogre for the plaintiff. Mr.Khandeparkar i/by D. Brijesh for the defendant. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 18TH FEBRUARY, 2009 DATED: 18TH FEBRUARY, 2009 DATED: 18TH FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. This chamber summons is taken out by the defendant judgment debtor. The defendant judgment debtor stated that pursuant to the decree he has paid a sum of Rs.6 lacs out of Court and a sum of Rs.4,50,000/- is deposited in the Court. 2. Mr.Mogre appearing for the decree holder confirms both statements. However, it is contended that the attachment warrant itself shows that the decretal amount with interest would be much more than Rs.10,69,139.17. 2 3. After the matter was argued for some time, both sides agree that, if a further sum of Rs.One lac is deposited in this Court on or before 31.3.2009, the subject decree will be marked satisfied. 4. The decree holder would be entitled to withdraw all sums deposited upto that date with accrued interest. Needless to state that if there is a default in compliance, the chamber summons would stand dismissed and thereafter the attachment is confirmed. All further steps in execution can then follow. 5. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)