MC 1312/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. BARUHAH Heard Mr. A. Ganguly, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. A. Phuka n, learned counsel appearing for the sole respondent. This application is filed under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condon ation of delay of 16 days in filing the connected appeal. Considered the grounds incorporated in the application. The grounds appear to be cogent and sufficient. Mr. Phukan, learned counsel appearing for the sole respo ndent however, has not resisted this application for condoning the delay of 16 d ays but he expressed his displeasure by filing objection for non-impleading Shri Babul Narzary [owner of the scooter No. AS-01H/ 2210] as party respondent in th e appeal. However, issue of impleadment of this particular person can be address ed while taking the MAC appeal. In view of the grounds contended in the application, the same is allowed. The de lay of 16 days in preferring the connected appeal is hereby condoned. Misc. Case No. 1312/2010 stands disposed of.