IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45144 of 2008 VEENA YADAV, Son of Sri Butari Yadav, Resident of Village- Jagnandanpur, P.S.- Rahui, District- Nalanda :---- Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR:----Opposite Party ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwari, A.P.P. ==== 2. 08.12.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 366/34 of the Penal Code. He is named in the First Information Report and happens to be the uncle of the girl who was forcibly married with the victim boy. It is submitted on his behalf that present is the case of arranged marriage but on account of dispute with regard to payment of dowry the case was registered in which parties have resolved their dispute and have filed compromise petition, Annexure-3. Perusal of Annexure-3 indicates that all the accused persons and the informant have resolved their dispute amicably, which fact be confirmed by the court below and if it is true that the dispute has been resolved between the parties then petitioner, namely, Veena Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif in connection with Rahui P.S.Case No. 21 of 2006. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)