IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34017 of 2010 UMESH YADAV S/O BADRI YADAV ……PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.11.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is also alleged for abusing the complainant in name of his caste ‘DUSADH’ in public view, who was working under the petitioner-contractor and part daily wages remained due which was being demanded by the complainant. If that is resolved by filing compromise that shall be taken in regular side, but this anticipatory bail is not maintainable. Accordingly, the prayer of petitioner for anticipatory bail stands rejected. However, petitioner is at liberty to surrender in the court below and pray for regular bail which shall be decided on its own merit without being prejudiced by this rejection order considering compromise in between the parties on the same day. Vikash (Mandhata Singh,J.)