^•^-^..1 .5" -^/./-^•; SlngteBench @f -11' ^ ^i^a J-l ^ W(C)N6.1^0f2009_ Peti'tiorier: Smt. Devi Ahuja'W/o Shri Dhamaj Ahuja, Vs. •r: Naj NagarPalikNigam,Raipur(C.G.) S :i 1C r &: c. WRTTFETTTKSN ^feisata^Bi.MBa.su'i? INBIA ^. s^ K 11'B K 'SStteSSSSSiKSSIK i^^^ie^£^^;^¥^^^'%^^ '^w-^/^yffiSSiSS!^SS £^^^i®;^igiS^ mCjH.EQlJR^QFCHH^fISCjARHATBIIASBtJBi^^ WRIT-PETmC)N.(Sy:No.l468'0^2009''"^^^^^^^ EETITIONER : Sinft. Devi Alluia. :: ' . • 1 •VERSUS. , < ^ SPONDENTS. :M^arpalikNieam.Raipur. r^^^^^^^^' .^ ^ •TOm':PETITO()KM®ERAKTIC^226..GCWS^FI;BTION .^^^TSBi^M>ffiaie-S]ln^atisU^KKAsmli6tri^3...;^ 'Preseril:;' ' SKrfcSattjay^S.'Agrawal.Adyoe^ SIm1£as&ifSliaksel,^pyoeatefbr^ ; G»RDER(ORALV ^ •.'.,,,'.'••^:^:i'^ 1; Leamed cpunsel appearmg^^fc . .petitioher ^urchased plot admeasuring 153 sq.ft.wtuch was a part of Nazul land bearing B£hasraNp. 278/4, admeasuriitg 450 sq. ft. situated ^ at/vUtage .TeIibandha,;Raipiff, fipm on&'T^ a ••J; ;;;permaner({Iessfie:and;i^structe&a •;^i::^,;sHbmits'::|lh^.aU^ofi^a'Sud(leri^^% ',,l?:^:^ofie®i(18|i^SS||l|®|g)ffi|g|jmgxfflie^E^^^^ '• eiieH3a@lie®si.iS|iBsi®g|K8||l|fig|dBJB^Bli|M^ •^lThe:^pefMi6ne^t&eFeaSse^Ma)Bii^^ CorpOratlb&'foran6tment-:ofaltema8¥e.sli^K':'" !2. The'iesp6ndent-GQrporati6nby,menM;d^ P/I)decidedthat esUbpownerswfaoUad'their^s Bhagat. Suigh • ehowfc^ to Railway • Crossing, and on- acGonrtk 'of, ^yidemng ofG^. toad, 1fieir[shc^s K^^ granted shops ofe^ . ^ /petitioner.lias^preiens^^ ^^.^.respondent-Corpor^pn.fbKTehabilitatiag^ . te :-^t.^":;<.:'"- ~ ^Eer;memo'dated^[(}I'.02.21Q&9a^ suitably,foF^depnyu^Aim;lion'iliisrliveIiliQod. ; ,: .' •:. ^. 3: :Shrt Kashif" Sbakeet,'Jeamed ccmnsel appearmg^% ; , .submits fhat.fhe Cpiporatlonhas alread^de^ petftioher at TelibandM€omme ialCompIex,B^ SKi ^ff L.dl'S K KS Kii1; El^ m ' Amit 2 - ; '•' (Armexur&^t),-wIiicK 'is under ^ ,. snbmits thatm^a^siik filedbyone Sh^ :;',4aGra{?Judge,aass^,3taiEUT,^ ,leamedjydge,byor<^4^ed 18.013010 (^rmexureR/2),has^^^ the construction oflhe oommerGial complex ,at Telibandha, wherem the shop has teeen^alkitted to thepetitioner. . " 4, SbitAgra\yal,leame(i"G6unsel;appearingfbrthepefiyQners^ it is not clear fiom the order dated I8.QI.2010, asto wfaether the construction oftUe conmieFual complex wherein fhe shop has been allotfed to thspetitioher, faas been stayed by the brder offlie4thCiviI ::;l';Judge,;'Glassli,\RatRur. .^.••::,.., ...,'::/: . ,.,1,' , ..-•'....:, •.:.•' 5. Bethat^as^itmay, te respofident-CorporMi^ •on thebastsofihe af&davitdated. 23.09.2010, md'there is.no1^t^ not.fo believe fhs aflEidavit. Slnce the matter is already siibjudice ': ^ befbrefUeCompetent.civilccMit.nointerferenceiswarra^ /stage as^fhe ^Eespond^-RQrporafM^ .g"eliBaHdHa^<wffieBg;eoatd^i@t^f?&aad^ ''accQunI'of';oi(iCT'gSssE; |bg|la^M '.. .,:^, ^.^ .f. • '...,' 6/ Thus;,af ttiis stage, HotKing^i^ivey^ l .HQwever,.;smeethe'mater;^is^penduig;'ITO ':i eoiDpetent.Cisil: Gc^,.; erty iswse^ approgrtate steps, tf ^ in the pendingfcivil 'suifor :';i.^otlierwise,:underthe provisions^dflaw. . , " ^ •' ^ ^ 7; ^ In regaid ;ta prayer % compensation, the same GanflQf be ;grauted as.determinatibh bf conrpensation requires .settletrient of ;dispufed question 6f facts and the loss, if aay to the petitioner. Thus, this Court is not. passmg. any' order. Howeyer, it is open to the ,; petitioner fo taKe appropnate reGourse as permissible under tlie to • 'so'advised.' .: ' , , \. '..^ ,'::. .: : .'•: ^' ^••- • ' •:':-:,:: S.'bi^vtew of the ^aboye,^te ^aforestated iiberty, if soadvised. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ..i:.;:I! ~Sfyfs^E^sssks^s^i"vs^5 "'sss'