THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos. 6357 AND 399 of 2009 DATE: 07th APRIL, 2011 Between: The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by the Authorised Officer, Land Reforms, Kakinada … Petitioner A n d Veeramreddy Kondalarao … Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos. 6357 AND 399 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: These Civil Revision Petitions are directed against the common order dated 09-04-2008 in L.R.A.No.10 of 2007 and L.R.A.No.8 of 2006 on the file of the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal-cum-IV- Addl.District Court, East Godavari, Kakinada. 2. The primary Tribunal passed an order stating that the lands sought to be excluded from the declaration of the declarant are not Inam lands and therefore, the claim of the declarant was rejected. On appeal before Land Reforms Tribunal, the orders of the primary Tribunal were set aside and the respondent-declarant was directed to produce relevant documents before the lower Tribunal the proceedings, if any, initiated under the mandatory provisions of A.P. (Andhra Area) Inam (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act 37 of 1956 (for short, the Act) converting the Inam Lands in Sy.No.114/1 and 114/2 of Panasapadu Village into ryotwari lands granting ryotwari pattas in favour of the appellant and in the absence of any such proceedings which are mandatory, the lower Tribunal is directed to exclude the said extents covered by Sy.No.114/1 and 114/2 of Pansapadu Village in computing the holding of the appellant. Challenging the same the present petitions are filed. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader, appearing for the appellant contended that there is no material filed by the respondent to show that the lands in Panasapadu and Koppavaram villages are Inam lands and that the primary Tribunal after considering the relevant material on record, rightly dismissed the same and that the appellate Tribunal without considering these aspects simply set aside the same and hence, he prays to allow the revisions. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent contended that the appellate Tribunal directed the respondent to produce the relevant documents before the lower Tribunal relating to the proceedings initiated under the Act, in converting the Inam lands in Sy. No.114/1 and 114/2 of Panasapadu Village into Ryotwari lands, that the appellate Tribunal after considering the material, rightly allowed the appeal and absolutely, there are no grounds to interfere with the same. 5. No doubt the lands in question in Sy. No.114/1 and 114/2 of Panasapadu Village were declared to be surplus. Thereafter the declarant filed the application before the primary Tribunal to exclude the lands in question from the holding of the declarant and the same was rejected by primary Tribunal on the ground that the records would go to show that the lands in question are not Inam lands. But strangely the primary Tribunal observed that Adangal extracts of the two villages along with the verification report would go to show that they are Government lands. Therefore, the question to be decided is whether the lands in question are Inam lands or Government lands. For that reason, the appellate Tribunal rightly directed the respondent to produce relevant material before the primary Tribunal with regard to initiation of proceedings under the Act 37 of 1956 for converting lands in Sy.No.114/1 and 114/2 into Ryotwari lands. Therefore, the impugned order needs no interference by this Court. It is only giving an opportunity to substantiate his case. 6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ JUSTICE K.C. BHANU 07th April, 2011 Ksm/Hsd