"^';y.w. ..^. • •\-' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH ; BLLASPUR Writ Petition fT) No. 6279of2008 Petitkuicr/ Leopard &uards India (I^Ltd., Ttuough Applieaxit/ Partner, R.M.Cliaudhary, 16/S, Nehru AppeUaiit Road, Supda, BJiiIai^TehsU&DistricfDuig Versus Respoadents i. HnioQ of <lndia, Tluimigh tbe Secretaiy, Departnieat of: Curifom & Ceirtral Excise (Puiance), New Delhi. 2. The Depu-^ CoiniBissioner, Ceutrat Excise Raage - II, BIuiai, District Dui% C.G. 3. Supermtendent, Custpm & Ccntral Excisc Circle - I, Jamul, BIulai, District Diu-g, C.G. •, ; : : • ; - : .: :: :- (WritPetition uiicter Article 226 aad 227 oftbe Constitution oflndia) (SB: HoiiTate Shri SaSsb K. Agnibotti >J.) -s~ -' • .' ' '..-• '• ": ' . -f- .-' ' • ' . •rl • Shri Sat^ndia SalMi, Advocate ^the petitioaer.- SBii Kashif Shakeel, Advocate lor fhe respondents. :'ltw" ' ' •'••',' . • ; ' QRBBR : ';.: : • : :; • (Passedionthis 12th DayefNoveiaber, 2008) 1. LearaedcouUsel ^peanag fbr the petitibne^ on iBstifuctio^ submits that the petitioner sceks .permissiion offhis C^^ withdraw fhis petition witli Jiberty"to^ ^ ^to\ &e alterriative i^tatutory ibrum tbM m^ Ue a<^ law. • - : '.: - .' !:' :; : , ! : - . :• : •-. : : • • 2. Leamed couiisel appearuig for the respondents tias no objection.-I ; • :\ ' '\''' : 1 :' / 3, In view oftlie above,thepetijyori;]Sidisinis daswithdTamn, with the above-stated liberty. Consequeritly, l.A.No. 1 is alSo tlisinissed. :, Thalmr ^Sd/-—1...'. • ;.^1: Satish^K.'a^gnthotn^ • p:; 1' .l-;':IJudge??";.s.L'.':.^ m'ti^^ r.- lil