HIGH COURT OF CHHATTJSGARH AT BILASPUR DiVSSiQNBENCH CORAM: HON'BLESHRiRAJEEVGUPTA,CJ. HON'BLE SHRi SUNIL KU!V!ARS!NHA,J. IVIisceSlaneous AppeaS (C) No.323 of 2007 ADpellants Cteimants Non-apDllcants Defendants c. 1. Lal Saheb Ekka,son of Bodhiram, aged about 49 years 2. Smt Panobai, wife of Lai Saheb Ekka, agedabout45years Both are residents of Viliage - Khamhardoh, PoSice Station Sarangarh, District Raigarh(CG) VERSUS x 1. Balram Prasad Sharma son of Late Shri Ram Aiakh Sharma, aged about 46 years, R/o Pachrukhi, Police Station Mehli,District Chapra (Bihar)House of Sunil Kumar Jaiswal Vasundhara Nagar, Changorbhata Purani Basfi Raipur (CG) (Driver) 2. Sunil Jaiswal son of Kunjbihari Jaiswal, aged abtou 42 years, R/o Vasundhara Nagar, Changorabhata Raipur (CG) (Owner) 3. The New India insurance Company Limited Branch No.1, Second Floor Ralpur Development Authority Building, Bajrang Market, GE Road Raipur(CG) (Insurer) Memo of Appeal underSection 173 ofthe MGtorVehides Act. 1888 Present : ^ShriBhaskarPyashi.counseJfortheappeliants. 'v:' '$hri Sanjay Agravt/al, counsel for respondents ^.1^2. Shri Pi-ashant Jayaswal, Senior Advocate with ShrrShailendra Sharma, counse} forrespondent No.3. ORDER ?th (26tn August, 2009) The following order of the Court- was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri Bhaskar Pyashi, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the appeal filed by the appellants for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the First Additionai Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mahasamund (CG) vide award dated 19.09.2006 passed jn claim case No.4/2006 with liberty of filing cross-objections for enhancement of the compensation in the appeal ofthe insurer / owner ofthe offending vehicie. 2) Permission granted. 3) With the above liberty, the appeai is.dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Chief Justice padma Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge \"'