1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6116 OF 2005 Raghunath Kashinath Rajpure ..Petitioner. Vs. The District Rehabilitation Officer, Satara & Ors. .. Respondents. .... Mr. P.J. Shinde for the Petitioner. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondents. .... CORAM: KSHITIJ R. VYAS, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. 20th April, 2006. P.C. : From the material which is placed on the record, it would appear that the total holding of the Petitioner in Village Darewadi, Taluka Wai, District Satara and in other villages is 3 Hectares 31 Ares. Of this, 2 Hectares 61 Ares was in the benefited zone and 69 Ares in the non-benefited zone. The total land which has been acquired is 76 Ares. The holding of the Petitioner was in excess of the slab. The challenge is that the notice is issued in the name of a dead person. The authorities have to be guided by the revenue records as they stand. If the records have not been mutated, no 2 fault can be found in the acquisition proceedings. There is no merit in the Petition which is accordingly dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)