,a: OJ ,0 (g/L/ #//o5~d BEFORE TEid; MADEYA PRADESH STAE ADMINISWTIVE EIBUNALR o.A.No.‘EO7<! J96 BETWEEN Shri G.L.Borka.r, Eead Clerk Office of the‘Superintendent of Police, Raigarh M.P. . . .Pe'titiomr AND [3,,4 Me ffz/Z 5/ M ¢ 74/: d14; Q$’ The Se cre‘tary’ Rome Departme n (Police) Government of Maéhya Pradesh Bhopal. The Director General of Police adhya Hadesh BhOpal. 3. The Superrinte ndent of Police, Durg M.P. .l . . . . .Respoment. 'PETITION UNDER .EC?.19 OF TEE STAEE ADMINISEATIVE mIBUNAL.‘ ACT / t M w Shri G.L.Borkar. VERSUS The State of M.P. & Othe. rs HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION x82 No. 1471 of2005 PBTI'HONER \ I ‘ RESPONDENTS TRIBUNAL ACT Present: None for the petftioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner pursuing the matter. In View ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want ofprosecution. Registiy is directed to send a copy ofthis order to the petitioner, forthwith. / ‘ SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotrig J. (Passed onW...“ 09 day of December, 2009) may not be interested in \ sdl- . . Satish K. Agmhotri Judge r, PETITION UNDER SEC. 19 OF THE STATE ADMINISTRATTVE v