..f. \o ul 'm^ts. ^ No.@ IN THE HIGH COURT OP CHHAmSQARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. ^/^^-/2005 PETITIONER ^^-<^ .^ "^' :^ Dr. Sunil Kumar Yadav ( S.R. Yadav) S/o Late Shri B.R. Yadav, aged ^\\-<^" about 40 years, Occupation-Asst. ^ Surgeon, Maharani Hospital, Jagdalpur, R/o Qty. No. F"l, Nayapara, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS / :1. ^ ^ K //t^' "/•f,-•1^ ^">^r"-< /;?./' f^/ l'/Q^ !SI s..^f4^ '\.,:- ."u s\ ^y.^ -^ \p 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretaiy, Public Health 8& Family Welfare and Medical Education Department, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.GJ. State of Madhya Pradesh Through : The Secretaiy, Public Health & Family Welfare and Medical Education Department, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) The Secretary, General Administration Department (G.A.D.) & State Re-oragnisation Cell Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.). 4. Union of India, Through : The Secretary, Ministiy of Personal Public Grievances and Pension, Personnel 85 Training Department, New Delhi. /VA Page No. (2) -5. Director, Health Services, Raipur (C.G.). 6. Chief Medical & Health Officer, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.). WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCB OF APPROPRIATE WRIT, DmECTION. ORDER TO DO JVSTICE IN THE MATTER ~J^ t ^^'^rt^jNr 1 }^ '^ 39- -3^[ ^'[^KTq, ^T^FT^, •f^TI^y ....^^..l^. -271/2006 Shri Subhash Yadav, Shri Satish Gupta, Dy^ (pounsel for fhe petitioner. Govt. Advcoate, for fhe State. aclbon Heard, The petitioner, who petition challengiag the him, fhough he has been Pradesh. State counsel does This Court, while W.P. No.516/03 (Dr. Ashof^ fi4aUy notj dispute pasjsiag of ChheKttlsfyarh esnd othef^, has dealt witihi the matter ia great detaU. Having thus consider^d aforcsaid case, in tihe opinio^i order staying fhe operation aufhority aiid cannot be su^ for rcUevmg. AccQrdnigly, fhe w^t respondents are directed t^ possible prefei-ably by 31st J^nuary, Certified copy as per r^iles. Copy to State counsel ^T^T^ ^ •^^t^^ir 5$ a Doctor, has fited the present of respondents in not relieving allocated to the State of Madhya the fact the onler dated 17-12-2003 in Kumar Jedn cmd others vs» S^eite aad ia view of fhe decision in the of fhis Court, it is directed fhat the |of the relieviiig order is without aay ^taiaed and the petitioner is entitled petition is allowed aad fhe j> relieve the petitioner as early as jmuaiy, 2006. br coinpMaace. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge