IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 7045 of 2005 Between: B.Sudhakar, S/o. Chinnanarayana, Mahaboobia Panjetan Junior College, Matwada, Warangal, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of A.P. rep. by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Intermediate Education, Andhra Pradesh, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3 The Secretary & Correspondent, Mahaboobia Panjetan Junior College, Matwada, Warangal, Waragal District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to May be pleased to issue writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not considering the representation dt.15-02-2002 of the petitioner to absorb his services against the grant-in-aid post of Junior Lecturer in Telugu in the 3rd respondent College as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional consequently direct the 1st respondent to consider the representation dt.15-02-2002 of the petitioner to absorb his services against the grant-in aid post of Junior Lecturer in Telugu in the 3rd respondent College w.e.f from the date of his appointment and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.V.SUBBA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court at the stage of admission made the following : ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus to declare the action of the 1st respondent in not considering the petitioner’s representation, dated 15.2.2002 to absorb his services against the grant-in-aid post of Junior Lecturer in Telugu in the 3rd respondent-college as illegal and arbitrary. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Higher Education. The petitioner submitted his representation for absorption of his services against the grant-in-aid post. In pursuance of the petitioner’s representation, an appropriate decision has to be taken by the respondents. Therefore, without entering into the merits of the case, I consider it appropriate to direct the 1st respondent to take appropriate decision on the petitioner’s representation, dated 15.2.2002, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. In the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. _______________ (K.C. BHANU, J.) 1st April, 2005 bcj To 1 The Principal Secretary, The State of A.P. Higher Education, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Intermediate Education, Andhra Pradesh, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3 The Secretary & Correspondent, Mahaboobia Panjetan Junior College, Matwada, Warangal, Waragal District. 4 Two C.Cs. to the Government Pleader for Higher Education, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 5 Two C.D. copies