IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-32030 of 2009 Date of decision:21.12.2009. Dimpy son of Satpal ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Neena Madan, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 and 3. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. In this plea for quashment based upon compounding, the report furnished by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karnal is to the effect that the parties did appear and made a statement before her on 01.12.2009 owning up the compounding. In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.448 dated 01.10.2009, under Sections 323, 324, 148, 149, 506 IPC, Police Station Sadar, Karnal (Annexure P-1) shall stand quashed on account of compounding. December 21, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE