-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CONTEMPT PETITION NO.274 OF 2006 The Nasik Merchants’ Co-op. Bank Ltd. : Petitioner V/s. M/s.Indoplast PVC Pipe Company & Ors. : Respondents ... Mr.R.M.Haridas for the petitioner. Mr.Warunjikar for respondent nos.2 & 3. Ms P.S. Cardozo, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for resp. no.6. ... CORAM : S.A.BOBDE, J. DATE : AUGUST 22, 2007. P.C. 1. The petitioner’s allegation is that the property has been conveyed by the respondent nos.2 & 3 in contravention of the order of this Court to the respondent no.4. However, Mr.Warunjikar, the learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 & 3, points out from the affidavit-in-reply that the respondent no.4 has re-conveyed the property to the respondent no.2, upon realising the mistake, since the respondent no.3 was not available for execution of the re-conveyance. They have also tendered an unconditional apology for the mistake. However, in the circumstances, there is no reason to -: 2 :- proceed with the Contempt Petition. 2. The Contempt Petition is hereby dismissed. S.A. BOBDE, J.