1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4442/2009 Jethu Singh vs State of Raj. & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : - 4.5.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. PS Bhati, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner's services have been transferred from the Forest Division, Jaisalmer to Forest Division, Barmer vidde order dated 25.2.2009. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents themselves have issued guidelines how the transfer is to be affected by issuing office order dated 22nd July, 2003 and they have not followed the condition no.C of the said circular and petitioner is not junior most and he did not desire for transfer, therefore, the respondents have violated the guidelines, which is binding upon them as they have themselves issued the same. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. In the matter of transfer employees if the guidelines 2 are issued to see that there may be transparency in normal and routine transfers that does not take away the right of the employer to transfer an employee in exigency of the service. Therefore, I do not find any reason to interfere in such matter. Hence, the writ petition of the petitioner is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-