FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. CONTINUATION SHEET No. CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE. SIDE. SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1719 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 1719 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 1719 OF 2004. Vijender Dhuri Singh .. Applicant. vs. Municipal Corporation for Gr. Mumbai & anr. .. Respondents. ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders appearnaces,Courts’s : orders or directions : and Registrar’s orders. : ------------------------------------------------------------ Shri D. Dwivedi for the petitioner. Smt. Trupti Puranik for respondent No.1 Shri D.P. Adsule, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.M.KANADE,J. V.M.KANADE,J. V.M.KANADE,J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 24-2-2005. 24-2-2005. 24-2-2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. 2. By order dated 3.2.2005, this Court ( A.M.Khanvilkar, J.) had directed the Deputy Commissioner of Police to file affidavit. Accordingly, affidavit has been filed. Thereafter, on 8.3.2005 further order was passed by the learned Single Judge asking the appropriate authority to explore the possibility of proceeding against the concerned officer for offence under the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act. Thereafter, further affidavit has been filed in which it is stated that opinion has been taken from the Legal Advisor of the Police Commssioner wherein it is stated that there is no evidence against the Police Inspector Shelke to lodge an offence under Prevention of Corruption Act or under the Indian Penal Code. Explanation is accepted. 3. In view of the affidavit filed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police dated 23.2.2005, writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn. -----