IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-2158 of 2009 Date of Decision:25.5.2011 Yogesh Malhotra .... Petitioner Versus Gitika @ Anjali @ Rittu and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Ramesh Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Shukla, Advocate for the respondents. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The matter is compromised. The petitioner and respondent No.1 have got their statement recorded to the said effect. As per the statement of respondent No.1, she wishes to withdraw the present petition in pursuance to the compromise. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the parties shall be bound by the terms and conditions of the order passed in Mediation Case No.602 of 2010 on 20.4.2011 as well as the statements made before this Court. 25.5.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE