1 C.P.8.09 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 08 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 432 OF 2004 [ Tanaji Shivaji Chobe Vs. Rajabhau Ajinath @ Adinath Chobe and others ] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr.P.P.More,Advocate for petitioner Mr.Abhijit Choudhary Advocate for R.No.1 CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 14TH SEPTEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . This Contempt Petition alleges disobedience of contempt of the order passed by this Court on 02.08.2006. It appears that this Court granted time for filing reply, however, respondent Nos. 1 and 2 were directed not to alienate the suit property during that period. The said order passed by this Court was confirmed 2 C.P.8.09 by this Court, by subsequent order dated 11.10.2007. 2. This Contempt Petition was heard for admission on 09.06.2009 and this Court was pleased to issue notices to the respondents, returnable within eight weeks. Pursuant to the notice received, respondent No.1 has filed affidavit-in- reply. In para No.13 of the said affidavit-in-reply it is stated that the sale deed is executed on 17th May, 2004 and the Mutation Entry bearing No.2082 recorded in the revenue record on 15.07.2004. 3. Therefore, after reading affidavit in-reply filed by respondent No.1, in particular para No.13 of the said affidavit in-reply, it is abundantly clear that sale deed has been executed by respondent No.1 on 17th May, 2004. 3 C.P.8.09 However, interim order is passed by this Court in the year 2006. 4. Therefore, in my opinion, there is not disobedience of the order, muchness willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court. . In that view of the matter, Contempt petition stands disposed of. Notice stands discharged. Sd/- [S.S. SHINDE, J.] MTK