IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellanious No.11240 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Santosh Singh 2. Onkar Singh 3. Mukesh Kumar Singh @ Pappu Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== 2 27.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the co-villagers of the informant are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 385, 379, 504 and 386/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of demand of Rs. 1,00,000/- from the son of the informant. It is submitted that the F.I.R. has not been lodged by the son of the informant and moreover, the informant has retracted from his initial version and has filed a compromise petition before the learned court below to that effect. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Buniadganj P.S. Case No. 71/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- ( Dinesh Kumar Singh ,J