BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Wednesday, the Fourteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16303 of 2011 1 ESSAKI 2 GOTHAI :PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NOS.1 AND 3 -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALANKULAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. (CR.NO.547/2011) :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.DURAIRAJ, Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. ORDER:The Court Made the following order:- The petitioner is arrayed as A1 & A3 and they prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii)I.P.C. and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.547 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police. 2.Heard Mr.S.Durairaj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, stringent conditions may be imposed for the secured presence of the petitioners. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I could see that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 14/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District. 2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Inspector of Police, Alankulam Police Station, Tirunelveli District. +1CC to M/S. S.DURAIRAJ Advocate SR.No.43654. RP/19.12.2011/1P/6C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16303 of 2011,Date:14/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/