-1- Civil Revision No.698 of 2011 (O&M). IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Date of Decision: January 31, 2011. Civil Revision No.698 of 2011 (O&M). Smt.Parkash Sharma ... Petitioners. VERSUS Devinder Kumar and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL. 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Ms. Shashi Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- MOHINDER PAL, J. The plaintiff-petitioner is aggrieved against the order passed by the trial Court whereby the prayer of the plaintiff for not allowing defendants Nos. 1 and 2 to produce, file, tender or exhibit any original document in the suit filed by the plaintiff for declaration and rendition of accounts was declined. -2- Civil Revision No.698 of 2011 (O&M). After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the impugned order, I do not see any reason warranting interference in the impugned order passed by the learned trial Judge. Defendants Nos.1 and 2 have filed a counter claim in the case on the basis of Will dated 20.3.2005 executed by Bishamber Nath Sharma (deceased) in their favour and have sought the relief that they are entitled to deal with the bank accounts and other suits properties of the deceased. The defendants cannot be restrained from producing on record documents on which they place reliance. Of course, evidentiary value attached to these documents will be examined by the trial Court at the time of finally deciding the matter. Dismissed. ( MOHINDER PAL ) January 31, 2011. JUDGE ak