IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 1280 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made JJJJJ JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO Nos. 1 to 5 No -------------------------------------------------------------- SURAT PANJARAPOLE Versus PREMABHAI UDABHAI VANZARA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR NAGIN N GANDHI for Petitioner MR BS OZA FOR MR.ADIL MEHTA for Respondent No. 1 MR LR POOJARI, APP. for Respondent No. 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 24/03/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT The learned Counsel for the petitioner produces a letter addressed to him by the Managing Trustee of Shri Surat Panjarapole, Surat, the petitioner herein,intimating that 74 cows which had been entrusted to the petitioner had already died. In the circumstances, it is obvious that the petition has become infructuous and Shri B.S.Oza on behalf of Mr.Adil Mehta, learned Counsel for respondents no. 1 and 2 states that they have no objection if the petition is disposed of accordingly. The petition is therefore disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule discharged. -- m.m.bhatt