IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3654 of 2011 SIPU KUMAR @ SIPU SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 29.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner being husband of the deceased is languishing in jail custody since 26.03.2010 in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 19 of 2010 registered under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Admittedly, petitioner had solemnized his love marriage with the deceased six years ago and due to the above stated wedlock, a son was born. It is alleged that petitioner as well as his other family members committed the murder of the deceased on account of non-fulfilment of dowry demand. It appears from submission of learned Additional Public Prosecutor that in course of investigation, one decomposed dead body was recovered and the sister of the deceased claimed to have identified the aforesaid dead body on the basis of tattoo appeared on the hand of the above stated dead body and except the aforesaid circumstance, there is nothing against the petitioner though it is stated that petitioner has confessed his guilt before the police. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, as a matter of fact, deceased died of diarrhoea in course of her treatment and subsequently, her dead body was cremated but the informant was annoyed on account of love marriage of the 2 petitioner with the deceased and that is why the informant has lodged this false case against the petitioner and his other family members. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-III, Patna in connection with Sessions Trial No. 1270 of 2010 arising out of Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 19 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )