IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9713 of 2010 DUKHAN KAPRI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 22.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Chilly powder is found adulterated. Sample was collected from shop of the petitioner, though he is denying its ownership. Nature of the adulteration or other family member being owner of the shop if favours the petitioner, that can be considered in regular side. Prosecution report is clear about petitioner being owner of the shop. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected. However, he is directed to surrender before the Court below and pray for regular bail in connection with G.O. No. 9 of 2010/T.R. No. 2476 of 2010 pending in the Court of S.D.J.M., Madhubani which shall be decided without being prejudiced by this rejection order. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)