IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 261 OF 2006. APPEAL NO. 261 OF 2006. APPEAL NO. 261 OF 2006. Rakesh Indermohan Dhingra. ... Appellant. Versus. Mrs.Swati Rakesh Dhingra & others. ... Respondents. FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.159 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.159 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.159 OF 2006 Swati Rakesh Dhingra. ... Appellant. Versus. Rakesh Dingra and others. ... Respondents. Shri Rajiv Patil for the Appellant in FA 261/06 & Respondent No.1 in FA 159/06. Ms.A.R.S.Baxi for the Respondent in FA 261/06 and Appellant in FA 159/06. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 4th May, 2006. : 4th May, 2006. : 4th May, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The consent terms are already taken on record on 5th April 2006. However, final order was not passed on that day as the Respondents Nos.2 and 3 in both the Appeals had not signed consent terms. The consent terms already taken on record on 5th April 2006 was signed by the Appellant and the Respondent No.1. Today the Advocates appearing for the parties have tendered on record consent terms duly signed by the Respondent Nos.2 and 3. The same are taken on record and marked "Y" for identification. The Advocates appearing for the parties state that the consent terms tendered today is a true copy of the consent terms filed on 5th April 2004 which : 2 : 2 : 2 : is marked "X" for identification. The Advocates appearing for the parties state that the First Appeals may be disposed of in terms of the said consent terms. Accordingly the First Appeals are disposed of in terms of the said consent terms. Decree to be draw accordingly. Judge. Judge. Judge.