1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.10.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.BASHA and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Appeal (MD) No.1079 of 2011 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2011 The Principal, PSN Institute of Technology, PSN Nagar, Ramanathichanputhur, Kumarapuramthoppur Post, Kanyakumari District. ... Appellant/ 2nd respondent Vs. 1.K.Ramesh Raja 2.The Director, Directorate of Technical Education, Chennai - 25. 3.The Principal Jeya Polytechnic College, Sawyerpuram, Tuticorin District. ... Respondents/Petitioner & Respondents 1 and 2 Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, praying to set aside the order, dated 29.09.2011, made in W.P.(MD).No.9742 of 2011 by the learned Single Judge of this Court and allow the writ appeal. Prayer in WP(MD)No.9742/2011 and MP(MD)No.1/2011:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the second respondent in connection with the impugned order Letter of attendance given by him in Lr.No.PSNIT/BC/2011- 2012/0296, dated 18.08.2011, quash the same as illegal and arbitrary in so far as giving credit of attendance to the period 01.07.2011 to 03.08.2011 and consequently, direct the second respondent to give full credit of attendance for the abovesaid period and thereby direct the 1st and 3rd respondents to accept the same and allow the petitioner to complete the course and publish the results within a stipulated time. For appellant .. Mr.T.Pon Ramkumar For 1st respondent .. Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu (Caveator) For 2nd respondent .. Mr.K.Mahendran, Special Government Pleader https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by K.N.BASHA, J.) The challenge in this writ appeal is to the order passed by the Writ Court, dated 29.09.2011, in W.P.(MD).No.9742 of 2011, allowing the writ petition filed by the first respondent herein by setting aside the order of the appellant herein and consequently directing the third respondent to give full credit of attendance for the period from 01.07.2011 to 03.08.2011. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu, learned counsel for the first respondent and Mr.K.Mahendaran, learned Special Government Pleader for the second respondent. 3.The learned counsel for the appellant mainly contended that certain unwarranted remarks and allegations have been made against the appellant and as such, the appellant has been compelled to prefer the present writ appeal. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that in the event of giving full attendance for the period from 01.07.2011 to 03.08.2011, the appellant is having serious apprehension of action likely to be taken by the second respondent viz., the Director of Technical Education, however, Mr.K.Mahendran, learned Special Government Pleader would submit that the appellant viz., the Principal of the institution, has been directed by this Court to give attendance and such being the position, the question of taking any action against the appellant herein not at all arises. 4.Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu, learned counsel appearing for the first respondent contended that there is no infirmity or illegality in the order passed by the writ Court warranting the interference of this Court and the writ Court has assigned valid reasons for setting aside the order passed by the appellant herein in respect of the attendance. 5.Considering the above submissions and recording the statement of the learned Special Government Pleader, the writ appeal is hereby dismissed, as we are of the considered view that absolutely no ground is made out by the appellant warranting interference of this Court in the order passed by the Writ Court, dated 29.09.2011, in W.P.(MD).No.9742 of 2011. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (C.O) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar (C.S) To: 1.The Director, Directorate of Technical Education, Chennai – 25. + 1 cc to Mr.T.Pon Ram kumar, Advocate, SR No.36061 Judgment in W.A (MD) No.1079 of 2011 19.10.2011 gcg/RJ/19.10.11 (IT) 2p/3c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/