IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.W.J.C No.3121 of 2008 Kumari Shushma, wife of Shri Sanjay Kumar Singh, resident of village Vikrampur, P.O. Vikrampur, P.S. Cheriya Bariarpur, district Begusarai .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna 4. The Divisional Commissioner, Munger Division, Munger 5. The District Magistrate, Begusarai 6. The Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Establishment Committee, Begusarai 7. The District Superintendent of Education, Begusarai 8. The Block Development Officer, Cheriya Bariarpur, District Begusarai 9. The Block Education Extension Officer, Cheriya Bariarpur District Begusarai 10. The Parkhand Pramukh, Cheriya Bariarpur Parkhand Begusarai 11. Shri Kamlesh Kumar, son of Ramanand Singh, resident of village Vikrampur, P.S. Cheriya Bariarpur, district Begusarai, the then Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Raj Vikrampur, Anchal Cheriya Bariarpur, district Begusarai 12. Shri Dinesh Kumar, the Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Vikrampur, Anchal Cheriya Bariarpur, district Begusarai 13. Smt. Raj Kumari Devi, the In-charge Headmistress of Govt. Middle School, Vikrampur, Anchal Cheriya Bariarpur, district Begusarai .. Respodnents **** For the petitioner .. Mr. Tej Bahadur Singh, Sr. Adv. With Mr. Umesh Kr. Mishra, Adv. For the respondents .. G.P. XVIII **** - 2 - /2/ 09.01.2009 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Grievance of the petitioner is that on account of error committed by the concerned authorities in selection of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra she could not be selected as Siksha Mitra in Panchayat Raj Vikarampur, under block Cheriya in the district of Begusarai,. The selection was made in the year 2005. Petitioner’s case is that she was wrongly considered as daughter of the concerned Gram Panchayat when she is daughter-in-law. Further, her grievance is that in spite of the fact that there were two posts in the unreserved category, appointment was made only against one post. If appointment would have been made against another unreserved category post in that case she, having highest mark in the merit list, would have been appointed. Vide notification No. 974 of 01.07.2006 all Shikcha Mitras working on 30.06.2006 in the concerned Gram Panchayat have been absorbed as Panchayat Teachers/Block Teachers in the concerned school. As per policy decision of the Government after 01.07.2006 no posts of Shikcha Mitra has either been created or sanctioned. In spite of all these facts counsel for the petitioner submits that in the similar - 3 - circumstances, the Collector, Begusarai, considering the irregularities committed in selection of Shikcha Mitra has passed order in case of Rajeev Ranjan canceling selection of Vijay Shankar Kumar and Smt. Mridula Kumari. This order has been passed on 01.12.2008 vide Notification No. 1670, in spite of the policy decision of the Government that no further selection will be made on the post of Shikcha Mitra. 3. This writ application is being disposed off without recording any finding. The petitioner will have liberty to represent her case before the Collector, Begusarai, who will consider her case also in the light of order, contained in Annexure 27. The Collector must decide the case of the petitioner preferably within two months from the date of communication/production of this order. Cp:2/S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J.)