IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No.275 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.10.2012. Hanuman and others ...Appellants versus The State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: None for the appellants. Mr. Kunal Garg, AAG, Haryana. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No. 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? No. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? No. ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) There is no representation for the appellants. The counsel for the State however says that the subject matter of acquisition was brought through a notification issued on 13.02.2004. In proof, the appeal filed by the State and by the landowner, this Court has in two consecutive decisions affirmed the awards passed by the Reference Court. He places before me the copies of the judgments in RFA No.2530 of 2010, decided on 11.02.2011, titled as 'The State of Haryana Versus Het Ram' as well as the judgment in RFA No.3787 of 2011 titled as 'The State of Harynaa and RFA No.275 of 2012 (O&M) - 2 - others Versus Hanuman', and the connected cases decided on 29.07.2011. In terms of the said decisions, the appeal filed by the appellants would also require to be dismissed and accordingly dismissed. The copies of the orders are taken on record. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 06.10.2012 sanjeev