WP(C) 4791/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY The petitioner is aggrieved by the undue length of his attachment as Asstt. Teac her with Tengaguri M.V. School (hereinafter for short referred to as the School) , though appointed against a substantive post at Dewaguri M.E. Madrassa, both in the district of Morigaon. I have heard Mr. K. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. U.K. Goswam i, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department, Govt. of Assam. Briefly, stated the petitioner’s pleaded case, is that while he was working as A sstt. Teacher of Dewaguri M.E. Madrassa in the aforementioned district, he was b y order dated 04.01.2003 of the District Elementary Education Officer, Morigaon attached to the Tengaguri M.V. School with immediate effect. In terms of the sa id order his pay and allowances was to be drawn by the Head Mistress, Dewaguri M .E. Madrassa after submitting the attendance furnished by the Head Mistress of t he Tengaguri M.V. School. No T.A. & D.A. was admissible. The petitioner has complained that the Tengaguri M.V. School is situated at a ba ckward area, which is 20 k.m. distance from his house and that the communication system to the said School is also not adequate, resulting in undue hardship. This notwithstanding, the order of attachment continues, as on date, inspite of his repeated appeals to the concerned departmental authorities. The learned counsel for the petitioner, however, when queried by this Court has submitted that he (petitioner) till date has not submitted any written represent ation on the fond belief that the assurances on his verbal pleas would be attend ed to by the authorities concerned. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on a consideration of the s tatements made in the petition supported by an affidavit and also noticing the d uration of the attachment of the petitioner with the Tengaguri M.V. School by th e order dated 04.01.2003 (Annexure - 3 to the writ petition) this Court is of th e view that it would meet the ends of justice if he (petitioner) is left at libe rty to submit a representation ventilating the above grievances before the Distr ict Elementary Education Officer, Morigaon for the needful. Mr. Goswami submits that if such a representation is filed, there is no reason as to why the same w ould not be considered. In the above view of the matter, this petition is closed with a liberty to the p etitioner to submit a representation before the District Elementary Education Of ficer, Morigaon expressing his difficulties against the subsisting arrangement o f attachment. Need less to say, that if such a representation is filed, having regard to the inconvenience referred to by the petitioner, as well as the durati on of the attachment as effected by the order dated 04.01.2003, the aforemention ed authority would take a decision thereon by taking note of the above in accord ance with law. As the order of attachment exists since the year 2003, the repre sentation, if submitted by the petitioner, would be considered and disposed of w ithin a period of two weeks therefrom. No costs.