IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 4796 of 2005 Between: 1 Tirupati Sadaiah, S/o. Ramaiah, R/o. 10-4-136, S.T.V. Nagar, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 2 Godugu Chintha Lakshmma, W/o. Chengalrayulu, R/o. D.No.19-4-136, S.T.V. Nagar, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 3 Parlapali Venkata Subbamma, W/o. Pedda Subbareddy, R/o. Thummalagunta Village, Tirupati Rural, Chittoor District. 4 Nampalli Rajamma, w/o. Guravaiah, R/o. D.No.19-4-127, S.T.V. Nagar, Tirupati, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONERS AND The Mandal Revenue Officer, Tirupathi Mandal, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to Issue Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondent in not considering the representation submitted by the petitioners on 1.2.2005 seeking to issue the No. Objection Certificates to them in respect of their lands situated in Sy.No. 46/2, 46/5, 46/1 and 46/4 admeasuring Ac.2-00 cents each, situated at Akrampalli Village, Tirupathi Urban Mandal,Chittoor District, as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent to take necessary steps pursuant to the representation dt. 1.2.2005, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Cour deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.P.L.RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed ‘for default’. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 17-04-2008 Pvks/*