IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 2851 OF 1993 Murli Bashamal Chhugani .. Petitioner versus The Collector of Thane & ors. .. Respondents ... Mr.Vijay Patil for the petitioner. Ms.Sonali S. Pimpale i/b S.M. Kamble for the respondent no.2. Mr.V.S. Gokhale, AGP for the respondent nos.1 to 3. CORAM : S.B. MHASE AND CORAM : S.B. MHASE AND CORAM : S.B. MHASE AND D.G. KARNIK, JJ D.G. KARNIK, JJ D.G. KARNIK, JJ DATED : 18th January 2006. DATED : 18th January 2006. DATED : 18th January 2006. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr.Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms.Sonali Pimpale for the respondent no.2 and Mr.V.S. Gokhale, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent nos.1 and 3. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that by passage of time, the petition has become infructuous. Statement is accepted. 3. Petition is disposed of as infructuous. (D.G. KARNIK, J) (S.B. MHASE, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (S.B. MHASE, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (S.B. MHASE, J)