-1- Civil Revision No.284 of 2011 (O&M). IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Date of Decision: January 17, 2011. Civil Revision No.284 of 2011 (O&M). Raj Mehta ... Petitioner VERSUS Vishal Mehta and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL. 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- MOHINDER PAL, J. Plaintiff-Petitioner Raj Mehta daughter of late Shri Ram Chand filed a suit against her brother Vishal Mehta, her mother Narayani Devi and her sisters Sushma, Kusum, Nutan and Geetika (defendants-respondents) for separate possession by way of partition of 1/7th share of the plaintiff in the property -2- Civil Revision No.284 of 2011 (O&M). in dispute and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants- respondents from alienating, transferring or creating any interest of third person of any kind in the property in dispute. In the said suit, on an application filed by the defendants- respondents under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the learned trial Judge allowed them (defendants-respondents) to lead secondary evidence vide order dated 4.12.2010. The plaintiff-petitioner has challenged this order of the trial Court by way of filing this revision petition. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the impugned order, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the controversy involved, I do not see any ground which may warrant interference by this Court in the impugned order passed by the learned trial Judge. Vide the order under challenge, the trial Court ordered that photostat copy of the affidavit dated 16.9.1998, duly signed by the parties, who are close relations inter se, be treated as secondary evidence to prove the contents of the said affidavit. No prejudice has been caused to the petitioner-plaintiff by the impugned order. This revision is, accordingly, hereby dismissed being without any merit. ( MOHINDER PAL ) January 17, 2011. JUDGE ak