IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19656 of 2008 SUDARSHAN MAHTO @ DARSHAN MAHTO & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 18.09.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 are; father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased, Babita Devi. F.I.R. has been instituted for offence u/Ss 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no evidence to show that these petitioners have participated in the murder of the deceased. It has also been submitted that in the F.I.R. itself, it is stated that the petitioner had himself gone to inquire about the deceased as she was found missing from the house. Considering the fact, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners, namely, Sudarshan Mahto @ Darshan Mahto and Balkeshi Devi is allowed. In the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, they will be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Marhowrah P.S. - 2 - Case No.91 of 2007 to the satisfaction of CJM, Saran subject to the conditions as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. AKV/ (Mridula Mishra,J.)