1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1122/2010 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | Heard learned counsel for the parties. In our opinion, the grievance made in this petition can be redressed if the petitioners were to take recourse to remedy of statutory appeal, the same would be efficacious remedy. We are not impressed with the argument that the appellate authority would be biased. That is a presumptuous statement made. Assuming that the appellate authority were to reiterate the opinion recorded by the appropriate authority, the petitioners would have further remedy of appeal and revision, and eventually can come to this Court by way of appropriate proceedings. However, this is not a stage where we should exercise writ jurisdiction 2 under Article 226 of the Constitution. Hence the petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner as aforesaid. (S.S. SHINDE, J) (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J) Dt/- 18.02.2010 ndk/c1821027