[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.594 OF 2007 1. Shri.Raja Laxman Pawar 2. Dattu Parabhu Chavan 3. Vijay Parabhu Chavan All r/o Ganeshgaon Tal.Malshiras, Dist.Solapur ..Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.Milind Deshmukh Advocate for Applicants Mr.Rajesh More A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : APRIL 13, 2007 DATE : APRIL 13, 2007 DATE : APRIL 13, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking bail in C.R.No.74 of 2006 of Akluj Police Station. The said case is mainly under Section 392 of IPC. 3. The learned advocate for the applicants states that at this stage, he is not pressing the application for bail in respect of applicant no.1 [-2-] and he seeks liberty to file separate application for bail at a later stage in respect of applicant no.1. Liberty as prayed for, is granted. Thus, this application is being heard and disposed of only in respect of applicant nos.2 and 3. 4. None of the witnesses have identified the applicant nos.2 and 3 as having taken any part in the incident. No doubt, there is recovery at their instance. However, looking to the fact that they have not been identified by any of the witnesses, I am inclined to grant bail. 5. The applicant no.2-Dattu Parabhu Chavan and accused no.3 Vijay Parabhu Chavan to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.20,000/- each (Rs.twenty thousand only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount in C.R.No. 74 of 2006 of Akluj Police Station. The applicants shall report to the concerned police station once in a week till the conclusion of trial. 6. Application is disposed of. [Smt. V.K.Tahilramani, J.]