'l^iel^^ i^^^^tS^ '^'iS&.S'SSt^S^S :^'^S:S;^,a ^il^s^:^^ INT^BHIGHCOURTaOFJIJBKSATUREATBILASPURIC.G.) WRIT]EtEi"KlTION,No. r3046 /2003 PEOTnONER RESPONDENTS Rohit Kuinar Patel, Advpcate, Aged About 52 ,.yea.rs, S//6 Shri Kartikeshwar Prasad Patel, Advocate R/o BeediPara,? BeBind PoUce Station, SaTangarh, Distnct- Raigarh (C.G.). v^sus 1.:: State ofChhattisgarh, Througfa : Secretary,'Department bf Law 8s Legislative affairs, ^ D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. , Distnct 85 Session Judge, RaigarH 3. ] 1 Civil Jiidge,i Class-II, Sarangarh,| ! District-Raigarh;(C.GF.). | WMT:, .PETlTONoi,ilIND^?^^VR'raC!lteii2;2!6^3^& .^isssS^vniQN^^iV&KiiiKi^^UtSSWSKiiiii^^isW VTsen'sSix^BiE^MSSgBSSSSSSSSSSI^sS'S^S^iSSi^^^M^ gUltABI^^TORITS'S^iTD^lBSEgiIiBBi^ I! 1 -t- XI-HG—78 sn^c^d^fTC '^n^Ti^TsFRW '<:! -^:^ ',^-n ./'/• T^ '?n?ira?T, ®t{l'y4i®,ftai'y'j.i ^...^^...50.ZS.^O|^........ WW\ ^^^——^••-y-—'—^-a^---^ 200 311^1 Traq? (I'lf^'i^) ^aiW'Biit^iSi^i A?-iS-a6fll4 On a n»ntionbein9 nK«te, Shri K. N. NqndiB, COunsel Shri Bhaslw Pyasi, Panet Heard both the counsel. The petitioner hus prefc^ 226/227 of 1+ie Constitution propriety and correctness of 1+^ •by the Collectpr whereby the public notary has be»irenewed fiveyedrs. Brief focts leacling *o " petitioner is practicing as NotaF^ his tenure of -the certificate •therefore. the petitioner movec^; authority for renewd of •the su^ July 2000 his certificateiuas per the old law and provisfons ^f Notaries Act, 1952. Whereas,| the Act 36 of 1999/ whereby to five^arsw^.f. 17-12-1999. 1|he coaa is taRen up for hearing. (orthepetitioner. /er for 'tlTdi State. ^»i<tf<'i<i)i•H M)'^ fst^l <Pn+$x ^siRnan^i Ljawy< 'fwsdi •thia writ petition under ArMcle of India questioning -the legality. hleordepdated 31st Jufy 2000 pessed ^etitioner's certificate to practice as For a period of Ihree yecrs ins1%ad of filinig of this petition are that •ttie at Sarcnggorh, &istrict: ftajgarh. As |t-o practice as nofary wsa expiring, ^an application before the competent 1 <»rtifkarteand vide order dcrted 3^ n^wuied for a period of +hree 'years as ^f sub-sectwn (2) of Section 5 of fthe 1 -the said provision stood amendedi by •fffet period of three years was amended -i- XI-HC—78 311^1 Wl<;'fi<*; WT 3:TT^T sf^ict) ^^ I; y.' Barve ^sM ',vv :!/t '3S|''^(TZIRT2T, ®Tfl'«<l<o,fqdiy^< ^•^••-•••••^^^te an^fi tl^i' Ciciij«<<i.<T) 200 ;}?CTiwofei3n^r *—^. 1 s I; hw^ peruaecl sub-secrt Act. 1952 which peads •ttius:- itie "The goveniment recejpt of an appli^ation renew the certifical a period 6f five yeap|s Therefore, in view of certifjcate to proctice as Notar^ period of fjye years. In fhe cipoumstances, thtj allowed. Accordingly.ltie petiTftjn cfirectecl to renew the petiti<»ner|s for a period of fiw years insted^ original dortB front which he eertifica*e. Parties are entitted a()|»oihting •thtf notary may, on <and •rtie proscribed fee, t^ of pnactice of any notary for '•Isatdtime." ctir<fitCT<flt tTWff "ff fs%t ^f^f^[t ^ aifipTail^t n (2)<»f Section 8 of 'tticNotaries above provisions the petittoners ougKt 1w have been renewed for a petitioner's petition dese»^es to be js allowed and the re^»ondentsare certificate for pructicing as Notary of •ttiree yeoirs wilh effect from Ihe wcis entitled for renewal of the for cdttified copy of thfe order. Sd/- , L.C.BHADOO Judge'