a g9 Be h / pp(@o . In the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature of Chhattisgarh at \f‘l . "1“ Respondents - 1 . Bilaspur (C G ) W.P.N0. Lgqm/ 200.6 @2 Anandram Baghel, Aged 45 years,/ . Son of Shri Suklal Baghel, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Vinayakpur, R/o Village Chengri, Block, Tahsil & District Durg (C,G.) VERSUS The State Govemment of Chhattisgarh,/ Through — The Secretary, Tlibal Welfare Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Durgl. Block Education Officer, D District Durg (C.G.) Writ Petition Under Articles 226/227 o The Constitution 0 India or the issuance 0 WRIT in the nature o MANDAMUS certiorari Prohibition and or other suitable writ or writs order or orders, direction 0r directions: b a . a C29 HIéTvH COURT OF CHHATTISéARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (s! No. 4950 of 2006 : ‘ Anand Ram Baghe! Versus Pefi'tioner ”f, Respondems 5mm §ovt of Chlam'risgar-h 6e afhers Sing!e Beach: Han'ble Mr, Justice swish K. Agnihzrh'i. Shri Ajay Shrivasfuva, Advocafe for The Pefi'rioner. Smt Anju Ahujn, Dy. 60w. Advacafe for 'the respondems/Sm're, O R D E R (11” Sap'rember, 2006) 1. Learned counsel appearing for fhe pe'h'rmner submd’s fhaf while working as Ass151nn‘r Tacher- fhe pe‘h'honer has gone on fmmmg fa :mprove hes qualificah'ons on his own expenses ar‘mi arquwzd 8 TI Examma‘han Cer‘hfwafe m +he year 1992 from fhe Baard of Higher Secondar‘y Educu‘fion, Madhya Prade‘sh, 3v According fa learned counsef fer The petifianer, fhe peTi'rianer is enfi‘fled "m Mo advance incremen‘rs in View of fhe decision of this Cour-f in fhe case of Yashwan? Kumar Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipal Corporaiion, burg and another {2006 (II) MPJR—CE 96}. This Couri in ‘rhe case of Yoshwani Kumqr Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipal Corpomfion, Durg and anoi'her (Supra), came 1o The u conciusion fha‘t The feathers, who had obfuined B.T.I. Examim+ibn Certificafe on his/awn expanses, are cavered by 'the circular da‘red 24.12.98 (Annexure P/Z) issued by fhe Sin-re Governmen'r of Madhya Pradesh 3. Learned counsel for ‘Hne pei‘itioner further submits ma? fhe facts and question nf law involved in +he presenf case are Squarely covered by decision of 'i’his Cour'r in The case of Yashwan‘r Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporation, burg and cno?her (Supra), to which Iearned counsei appearing for fhe respondents fairly concedes and agrees with the avermenf made by learned counsel appearing for 'rhe peiiiioner. 4. Accordingly, fhe wri‘i petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B.T.I. Examination Certificate on his own expenses or not. No order .01 .»»»» ,i M . ; Sd/- l Satish K. Agnihom L Judge as to costs. Thakur