1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1076 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1329 OF 2008 Aizaz Ahmed Abdul Aziz. ... Appellant. V/s. Apurva Shah. ... Respondent. Mr. V.V. Thorat for the Appellant. Mr. Anil Mirza for the Respondent. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 5th APRIL 2010. P.C. :- In this matter, after hearing the learned Advocates appearing for parties, this Court, on 21st October 2008 had directed the Registrar (Judicial) to appoint an Officer of this Court to visit the suit premises and make a report particularly with regard to the possession thereof. 2. Accordingly, the report was submitted and this Court, on 24th October 2008 directed parties to maintain status-quo as per the Commissioner’s Report. 3. It is not in dispute that this order is continued till date. Further, the order under challenge has been made at ad- interim stage by the learned Trial Judge in Notice of Motion which was moved by the Appellant – Plaintiff. 2 4. In such circumstances, when the ad-interim order is being continued from October 2008, and there is a Report of the Commissioner on record to which objections have also been raised, interest of justice would be served if the parties are directed to maintain status-quo in respect of the suit premises/property as per the Commissioner’s Report till the Trial Court disposes off the Notice of Motion. 5. It is clarified that no opinion is expressed on the merits of the controversy and all pleas of both sides including the objections to the Commissioner’s Report are kept open. 6. Considering that the Notice of Motion is pending for a long time, the Trial Court to endeavor and dispose it off expeditiously. 7. Both the Appeal from Order and Civil Application are disposed off in these terms. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)