r BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BtLASPUR ( CHHATTISGARH ) CONTEMPT CASE N0. V^i^ /^0?8 2^,\) APPLICANTS ^ l®^'.4"? .^»--"",t«t;fc-l-v">'" ..... ^.^w*" "......•;••"•"" P(^T'...-;--;^-^ ° V?WA-"'O^ "' ^^^•^& ®^fl% 6-q -AP Buddhdev Piperiya, S/o Late Shri Asharam Piperiya, aged about 42 Years, Working as Assisstant Teacher, Primary School,Khurshidih, Tahsil and DistrictDurg(C.G.) 2. Kapur Singh, Dewangan, S/o Shri Semu Ram Dewangan, aged about 40 years, working as Assisstant Teacher, Primary School, Borasi, Block Durg,R/o Dundiya, Post- Arjundajahsil Gunderdehi, District Durg (C.G.) 3. Moradhwaj Chandraka,S/o Shri Pyare lal Chandrakar, aged about 44 years, -^/ ^ © working as Assistant Teacher (Primary School Borasi), Blcok Durg R/o Village Daukidiha, Post Matwari, Tahsil Gunderdehi, Thana, Anda, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS RESPONDENTS B.L. Kurrey, District Education Officer, Durg, DistrictDurg (C.G.) Hemant Upadhyaya, Ex- District Education Officer, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) Presently working as Assistant Professor at S.C.E.R.T. Office Shankar Nagar ,Raipur (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER^ECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT. 1971. \T ^swsst^^i x'v I S sn^'wmN? ^rarsntwg^w ^Sf •^WW^, WWW\6, J°ldl-Lllj,< ...€^.....&sS:L?J.^Q sn^i Ti=w(lyf^st<sT) TOnW ^Rftg 3TI$?I <ftf<4[ci<ifll 'RFfcff ^f fs'-^i '?f^^<. ^; 3TRm3]1$?r SB: Hon'ble Shri Maninara Moh^n snnvasiava. >».' 11-10-2Q11 disobedience of order dated 3/8/09 Shri Somkant Verma, couns^l for the petitioners. Shri Sushil Dubey, counsel fjar the respondent No.1. This contempt petition ha^ been filed by the petitioner alleging willful passed in W.P.(S) No.4053/09. Learned counsel for the petjtioners submits that the writ peUtion filed by the ] petitioners was dismissed as withdrawn with iiberty to move representation in the j iight of the statement made befojre the Court by the State counsel that if the petitioner makes a reprssentation decided strictiy in accordance (o the concerned respondent, the same shaii be fvith iaw. While dismissing the petition as withdrawn, a hope was expressefd by this Court that if the petitioner makes a representation to the concerned r^spondent within a period of one month from the date of receipt of CODV of this ord^r, the same is expected to be decided within a further period oftwo months from tjie date of its receipt Learned counsel for ihe pet but no decision was taken. The which was aiso disposed of vide petitioner to fiie another petition authorities do npt dispose off Thereafter, the petitioners again p| jtioners submits that a representation was made [•efore, contempt case (C) No.181/10 was filed order dated 16/08/2010 granting liberty to the t?f contemDt after two months if the concerned jthe representations fiied by the petitioners. [•eferred representation on 14/09/2010 along wrth copy of order dated 16/08/2010. ifinally, an order has been passed on 12/11/2010 rejecting petitioners' representaticfn. Learned counsei for the petitioners submits that though their representations l^ave been rejected, the order was required to be passed within the time stipuiated. ^'^TTc'^, ^^RFIT^—FS.-;^,—2/20' ; —1,50,000. -'^S'&te-.- \ '~t~ (A\ an^i-wi^ri^ a«n3iI^rignN» Deepii ^^1 '<11'4|i"|A|, »fllyil<o, r^.dl'M^'!. ....^fc..^^^ sn^l 1[PRr (Tjqfgsiqit) TCiTOT ^lte 3BI^t ^ After going through the repli the representation of the petitioil preferred on 14/09/201 Oand then particuiariy when no specific direci] petition IW.P.(S) No.4053/091 as thereforedischarged. Thepetition <t.i''<Ici'iil-< t(i*<c?i''? fs%"i 'dSngii ^STfOTS'I^T' 1 niea oy responaem NoTTainB'consiaering that er pursuant to order dated 16/08/2010 was the order has been passed on 12/11/2010 i.e. within a period of two months, 1 atn not inciined to proceed further in the matter ion was eariier issued while dismissing the writ withdrawn vide order dated 3/8/09. Rule is s finaily disposed off. The petitioners however, wOuid be at liberty to take recourse to remedy as may be available to them under ti^ie law in the event, they are aggrieved by order dated 12/11/2010. Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^P: q-:^TF$^, T'"iT'ir^TT^—FS/140—2/20':—1,50,000.