THE HON’BLE SMT.JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI Civil Revision Petition No. 1190 of 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order dated 23rd September 2009 made in IA No. 517 of 2009 in O.P. No. 362 of 2008, on the file of Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad, in not permitting him to file counter to the counter claim made by his wife in the main OP. The revision petitioner herein is the petitioner/husband and the respondent herein is the respondent/wife before the court below. The revision petitioner filed I.A. No. 517 of 2009 in O.P. No. 362 of 2008, under Section 151, CPC to permit him to file counter to the counter claim made by respondent/wife in O.P. The respondent/wife contested the application by filing a counter. The court below after hearing both the parties dismissed the petition. Aggrieved against the same, the present civil revision petition is filed. Heard and perused the order under revision. The order under revision reveals that in the divorce O.P filed by the husband, wife filed counter claim for restitution of conjugal rights. It is also clear from the impugned order that though the petitioner is well aware of the fact of counter claim made by the respondent-wife, he kept quiet and filed the above petition after the entire trial in the min O.P was completed and the matter came up for arguments and therefore the trial court dismissed the petition. In view of the cogent reasons assigned by the court below, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order and the civil revision petition is liable to be dismissed. In the result, the civil revision petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. _____________________________ dt.15.4. 2010 JUSTICE T MEENA KUMARI kvrk THE HON’BLE SMT.JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI Civil Revision Petition No. 1190 of 2010 15-04-2010