IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15391 of 2011 ISHWAR KUMAR SINGH @ ISHWAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 16.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner being Railway Engineer is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that the informant's brother was working in the contracting work of Railway and the petitioner was contractor whereas one Vijay Singh was the Assistant of the contractor when they directed the labourers to work fast when the brother of the informant tried to cross the railway track when he was crushed by a train. It appears from the impugned order that the learned court below did not find the case under Section 302 of the I.P.C. The F.I.R. reflects that the victim died on the spot when the occurrence took place. Moreover, the informant has subsequently retracted from his initial version and filed a petition to that effect. Considering the aforesaid facts, 2 let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Sonnagar Rail P.S. Case No. 1 of 2011, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)