IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2011 / 19TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26774 of 2011(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MUHAMMED,S/O.SAIDALAVI,KARUVADI HOUSE, PUZHAKKATTIRI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.JAMALUDHEEN SMT.LATHA PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM 676 505. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLATHUR POLICE STATION, KOLATHUR P.O, MALAPPURAM 679 338. 3. REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, MALAPPURAM, PIN 676 505. SR GP M.J.RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 26774 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 26.5.2010 EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST OF THE PETITIONER DATED 1.7.2011 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT (True copy) P.A To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).26774/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 11th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT The complaint of the petitioner is that in Ext.P1, the value of the vehicle has been fixed at Rs.3 Lakhs without obtaining a valuation report from the Joint RTO. 2. First of all, Ext.P1 itself refers to a report of the Joint RTO. That apart, Ext.P1 order was issued as early as on 26.5.2010 and that the complaint in this behalf was raised by the petitioner only on 1.7.2011. Therefore, the complaint is highly belated and this Court will not be justified in entertaining the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs