IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3470 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3470 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3470 OF 2007 Shri Vajaram Dhalaram Choudhary. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. A.M.Saraogi with R.S.Shekhawat for the applicant. S.S.Pednekar, APP for the State. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 24th October 2007. DATED: 24th October 2007. DATED: 24th October 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. During the course of hearing, it is brought to my notice that by an order dated 7th August, 2007 passed by this Court, the applicant was allowed to withdraw his earlier application for bail being Criminal Application No.2372/2007. It was, thus, dismissed as withdrawn. 3. It is, no doubt, true that the said order does not mention circumstances in which the application was allowed to be withdrawn. However, since the said matter was heard by me, I recollect that at that time I was not inclined to grant bail. Considering the possibility of the adverse order, learned counsel for the applicant chose to withdraw his bail application. It appears that absence of reasons has led to this fresh application. In order to arrest repeated tendency to move such application, reasons for withdrawal are being recorded herein. In absence of change in circumstances, fresh application for bail is not tenable. 3. In the result, application is rejected as not tenable. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE