CW 2490/10 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.2490/2010 Ramkesh Meena Versus State & Ors. Date of Order : 22/02/10 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. DP Pujari, for petitioner Counsel submits that petitioner & respondent-3 (Ramcharan Meena) were transferred vide order dt.18/09/2009 (Ann.1) and the petitioner was posted in Rural Sub Division Wazirpur (Gangapurcity) – pursuant to which he joined on 25/09/2009; however, respondent-3 being aggrieved, had preferred appeal-1055/2009 which was disposed of at the stage of admission by learned Tribunal vide judgment dt.20/10/09 with the direction to respondent-3 herein to make representation within 15 days and the State authority was directed to decide it within one months thereafter; however, in the meanwhile, operation of transfer order dt. 18/09/2009, qua respondent-3 herein was stayed till disposal of his representation. Counsel submits that on account of pendency of representation if any, made by respondent-3 herein, pursuant to judgment dt. 20/10/09 staying operation of transfer till disposal of his representation, respondents CW 2490/10 //2// have issued order dt.27/12/2009 directing the petitioner to work at Banor as an interim arrangement, being aggrieved, preferred appeal-13/2010, which was dismissed vide judgment dt.05/02/2010. Counsel submits that it was only an interim arrangement under order impugned but the representation of respondent-3 herein since has not been finally decided by State Government despite direction of the learned tribunal vide judgment dt.20/10/2009 within one month, petitioner has been allowed to continue at Banor vide order dt.27/12/09 and such arrangement has been made without affording opportunity of hearing to him. There appears to be justification in what has been urged by Counsel that once there has been direction by the learned Tribunal vide judgment dt.20/10/2009 in appeal- 1055/2009 to decide the representation within one month, keeping the same pending, may certainly cause prejudice to the petitioner. Without expressing the opinion on merits, this Court considers it appropriate to dispose of instant petition with the direction to the respondents-State to dispose of representation of Ramcharan Meena submitted in reference to order dt.20/10/09 in appeal- 1055/2009 forthwith but not beyond two weeks from receipt of certified copy of this order. Accordingly writ petition stands disposed of. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p2/ 2490CW10Fb22Rep.doc