IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.Rev. No. 150 of 2010 Decided on: 31.3.2011 Yashwant Raj …Petitioner Versus Neena …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. Ashok Sood, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. J.L. Bhardwaj, Advocate. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Ashok Sood, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the basis of instructions imparted to him by his client, prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present revision petition. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. Copy dasti on usual terms. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge March 31, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No