IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 30TH MAY 2008 / 9TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 12132 of 2008(T) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ A.P.SATHEESAN, KARUNA NIVAS, P.O.CHOVVA KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.V.MANOJKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 12132/2008 T APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1. COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF REGULAR PERMIT DT. 31/3/2008. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. True copy Tga ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 12132 OF 2008 T = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 30th May, 2008 J U D G M E N T An expeditious consideration of Ext. P1 application for renewal of permit is the prayer in the writ petition. 2. Learned Govt. Pleader, on instruction, submits that since the application was defective it was returned to the petitioner. If that be so, the petitioner has to resubmit the same after curing the defects. If the application is submitted in the manner as directed, that will be considered on merits. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-