FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2037 OF 2009 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2 This petition is opposed by the respondents on the argument that a petition claiming similar relief was filed through the same Advocate on record being Writ Petition No.6845 of 2008. The Court allowed the said writ petition to be withdrawn so as to enable the petitioner therein to pursue other remedy. The present petition has been presented with identical grievance and substantially praying the same reliefs, merely by changing name of the petitioner by the same Advocate on record. Besides, it is stated by the Counsel for respondent No.4 that so far as this petition is concerned, his representation has already been decided by the authority. If the decision is not communicated to the petitioner, respondent No.4 shall communicate the same within two weeks from today. The fact remains that virtually the same relief is claimed in the successive petition filed by the petitioner merely by changing name of the petitioner, that too, by the same Advocate on record. We deprecate this practice. 3 In the circumstances, this petition is dismissed. The amount of Rs.10,000/- deposited by the petitioner as precondition for entertaining public interest litigation, we direct that the said amount of Rs.10,000/- be remitted to High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Aurangabad. (S.S. SHINDE, J) (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J) 10.02.2010. PLK/*