IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC NO.13613 OF 2007 MOHMMAD JAHID, S/O MD. AJJAN, RESIDENT OF PATHAR KI MASZID, DARGAH ROAD, P. O. – MAHENDRU P.S. SULTANGANJ, DISTRICT – PATNA. ……………………….. PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE CUM DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER, DISTRICT – ARWAL, BIHAR 3. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, DISTRICT – ARWAL, BIHAR ………………………… RESPONDENTS ----------- 02. 05.03.2010 Claim of the petitioner was for payment of the bills, which he had raised for facilitating an election held in the district concerned. Some payment had been made, but much amount of the claim was not settled, which compelled the petitioner to approach the High court. In the counter affidavit, a decision dated 03.05.2008, passed by the District Magistrate, Arrah, has been brought on record as Annexure-R/1. The submission has been made that all payment payable to the petitioner, which has been calculated to the tune of 12 lacs, 50 thousand has already been paid. Other claims have been rejected as untenable. In other words, the claim of the petitioner has not been accepted. If there is a dispute of what has been claimed and what is payable, then the Writ Court can not be the right forum for passing any direction in this regard. The petitioner may have 2 other civil law remedy in this regard. The writ is dismissed with above liberty. skm (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)