g¢ W mqi$ 111,200 mar m (W) mwmm ant anéwm mmwmu ' WW§P§QW aiwma Single Bench: Hon'ble’ Mr. Justice Dhir'endra Mishm ‘ W.P. l;[ No.6082/2008 (Pe’rifion U/A 22 6 of Cons’ri’rufion of India) PETIHONER Lalmoh n Pafel, S/o Shri Basudeo Pa’rel, Aged abouf 5 years, occupa’rion: Gov’r. High Schooi > Bamhn Block, Pifhor‘a, DisTT. Mahasamund (C.6.) Vs RESPONDENTS 1. Sf e of Chhaffisgarh Through: Secrefar‘f, Sc ool Educm‘ion & Tribal DeparTmen‘f, D.K.S. Bh an, Dish‘. Raipur (6.6.). 2. The Assis‘ran‘r Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department Mahasamund, Dis‘ri'. Mahasamund (C.ér.) 3. The Dis’rricf Educafion Officer, Mahasamund, Dis-'1‘. Mahasamund (6.6.) Present: Mr. Somkan‘r Vermo, Advoca're f Jr ’rhe pefi‘rioner. Mrs. Smifa Ghai, Panel Lawyer for The S’rafe. O4. 1 1 .2008 Heard. By fhe presenf pefifion ’r e pefifioner is seeking a direction To The responden‘r au’rhorifies ’ro pay i cremem‘s and seniori'ry from The dafe of his ini’rial appoin‘rmenf in fhe ligh’r of de‘éision rendered by The M.P. STaTe 'AdminisTraTive Tribunal in O.A No.2745/89 (MadhukanT Yadu and 56 oThers Vs. STaTe of M.P. and oThers) daTed 24.8.1992 and also by This CourT in W.P. (s).No.6681/06. \3 ant ma m-aim mmm mar WW#‘WW $Wané21 r'Z/ Case of fhe pe‘H‘Honer‘ is fixed pay scale of Rs.100/-. Af' regularized, however, regular appointmen’r has no‘r been given aggrieved by ‘rhe aforesaid acT Adminisfra‘rive Tribunal, Jabalp learned Tribunal vide order daTed 24.8.1992 allowed fhe same. This CourT issue in W.P. (s) No.6681/06 vide order da’red 7.12.2006 directed the respondent authorities to consider the case of the petitioner of that petition. The petitioner herein also approached the respondent authorities to similarly situated, but the respo etitioner submits that the petitioner may be allowed to make a represe tation before the respondent No.1 for giving similar treatment to the petitioner and same pay—scale, which has already been sanctioned to oth'e similarly situated teachers on account of the order of the State Administ ative Tribunal and this Court. Learned for the State h ‘no objection if the petition is disposed with a direction to the responde ts to consider case of the petitioner. In view of the above sub issions of learned'counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of with iberty to the petitioner to make detailed m §qi$ .................................... E200 snézi qaas (W) ‘iha‘i‘ he was appoin'ied as Teacher on The ier comple'i‘ion of probation period he was pay Scale from fhe date of his initial ’ro him. Ofher similarly si’rua’red leachers 'on of The respondents, moved ’rhe S’ra’re Jr for gran'r of regular pay—scale wherein accord same treatment as he is also 1dents have not paid any heed. Learned counsel for the r m4” " Jr‘g. t, also while considering the same mmqf$ :.......“200 mat nil-<5 (W) «imam Wamm mmmmést *3» - mam'11'wm $Wm$ represenmfion along‘ wifh cerTifi‘ed copy of this order To respondenf No.1 raising all his grievances, raised in This pefifion, and on such represenfafion being made, fhz respondent No.1 shall decide The same wiThin a period of eigh‘r weeks from The do’re of receip’r of The represenTaTion, afTer considering all The poinTs raised by The peTiTioner and Taking inTo accounT The orders passed by The AdminisTraTive Tribunal and This CourT. CerTified copy as per rules. raf . sd/. Dhll‘endra Mish é a V Judge Mi zj'i. ‘