CRM-M No. 30329 of 2011 **** Sandeep Kumar and others v. State of Punjab Present: Mr. Pardeep Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioners. **** Learned counsel has argued that in terms of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Siddharam Sarlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra and ors. 2011(1) RCR(Crl.) 127 the orders Annexures P-4 and P-5 should normally enure till the end of the trial. Notice of motion. Mr. S.S.Gill, DAG, Punjab, at the asking of the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has supplied a copy of the petition to the learned DAG today in Court itself. Learned DAG has fairly stated that there is no contrary view which has been expressed. In the circumstances this petition is allowed. The orders dated 24.01.2011(Annexure P-4) and 22.03.2011(Annexure P-5) are modified to the extent that the trial Court is directed to accept the bail bonds of the petitioners which would enure till the end of the trial. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE October 05, 2011 sunita