IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P.No. 11304 of 2007. Date of Decision : 25.11.2008. Santosh Rani and others Petitioners. VERSUS Haryana Urban Development Authority and another. Respondents. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH. --- Present:- Mr. Rakesh Gupta , Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents. --- 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? M.M.KUMAR,J. The petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of a direction to the respondents to refund the excess amount paid by them to the respondents on account of payment of compound interest on the outstanding dues against the allotments of residential plots at various Sectors, Urban Estate, Karnal. In the written statement, the categoric stand taken by the respondents is that petitioner Nos. 1 to 11, 13 and 14 have purchased land in open market and they are re- allottees. They did not make any payment towards the installments and the enhancement of the compensation C.W.P.No. 11304 of 2007. -2- ordered by the Court. All the payments have been made by the original allottee. Moreover, they have filed their affidavits to the effect that they would accept the terms and condition of the allotment letter as per the provision of Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977. The respondents have also attached the detailed list of allotment and payment regarding plots of the petitioners. In the last column, the dates of allottee have been given which are ranging from 2006, 1983, 1995, 2001, 2007,1998, 2001, 1997 and even 1991. Therefore, it would not be possible to entertain prayer made by them after such a prolonged period. The situation with regard to petitioner No.14, who has sold plot No. 99, and the present owner in respect of plot No.12 who is petitioner before this Court refund have already been made in compliance of the order passed in Civil Writ Petition No. 19474 of 2006 decided on 8.12.2006 (Arvind Kumar and others Vs. HUDA). In view of this, the petition fails and the same is dismissed. (M.M.KUMAR ) JUDGE 25.11.2008 ( JORA SINGH) Anoop JUDGE