6. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1806/2010 DR.MAHESH CARPENTER Petitioner Through; Mr. Saurabh Jain, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA Respondent Through: Ms. Sonia Sharma, Advocate for UOI. 7. AND + W.P.(C) 1817/2010 DR. MEENAKSHI VERMA ...Petitioner Through: Ms. Seema Rewal Issar, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .. Respondents Through: Ms. Sonia Sharma, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER % 04.08.2010 These petitions were filed for seeking an opportunity to appear in counseling after the scheduled date. It is the case of the petitioners that the petitioners, for reasons beyond their control could not 1/- Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified appear for counselingon the scheduled date and time. This Court while issuingnotice of the petitionsvide order dated 16"" March, 2010 permitted the petitionersto attend the counseling,subject to further orders in these petitions. The counselstoday inform that pursuantto the counselingin which the petitionerswere permittedto appearthe petitionershave been allocated seats in Medical Colleges and have taken admissionsto the said Medical Collegesand are attendingclassestherein. The counsel for the respondent states that notwithstandingthe petitionershaving been permittedto attend counselingby way ofinterimorders in thesepetitions,the admissionsofthe petitionerspursuantto the saidcounselingare regularadmissionsand default ofthe petitionersin appearingfor counselingon the scheduleddate and time has been waived. In view of the aforesaid, no further orders are needed in these petitions.The same are disposed of leaving the parties to bear their own costs. AUGUST 04, 201 pp.. RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 2/-