1 ABA 138 OF 2011 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 138 OF 2011 Sou Vidya Mahadev Kukaday .. Applicant -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. D.V. Sutar, for the Applicant. Mrs. S. D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 25rd February, 2011 P.C. 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by a person who is alleged to have defrauded the victim for a sum of Rs.1,33,000/-as per FIR. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant is not involved in any such fraud. All the same in order to show her bonafides, the applicant would deposit entire sum of Rs.1,33,000/- without prejudice to her rights and contentions, within a period of one week before learned Trial Court. In view of this the applicant’s being in custody for the purpose of investigation may not be necessary though learned APP states that there are some more amounts involved in this crime. Therefore, in the event of applicant's arrest in CR No.18 of 2011, registered with Laxmipuri Police Station, Kolhapur, he be released on bail on his furnishing PR Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more solvent 2 ABA 138 OF 2011 sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.25,000/-; on the following conditions :- i) The applicant shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,33,000/-, within a period of one week, before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Kolhapur which amount the learned trial Court shall invest in any nationalized bank to earn maximum interest and shall deal with the same at the end of the trial as per result of the trial. ii) The applicant shall make herself available on 1st March, 2011 at 10.00 a.m. for interrogation by Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when required Investigating Officer. iii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iv) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. v) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of Maharashtra and ors, in S.L.P No.7615 of 2009. vi) The application stands disposed of. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)