IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43611 of 2010 SANDEEP PASWAN S/O JAGARNATH PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.2183 of 2011 GIRJA YADAV SON OF LATE RAGHUNANDAN YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------- 2. 2.2.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence u/ss.147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 337, 307, 389 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners were refused bail by an order dated 21.5.2010 vide Cr.Misc.No.17953 of 2010 but they have renewed their prayer for bail on the ground that the co- accused, who was named in the first information report, has been released on bail by this court as also there is no progress in the trial and they have fair antecedents. Considering the same, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Jehanabad in Kako P.S. case No.50 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor shall be the brother/father of the petitioners and the other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who - 2 - will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (v) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )