HEGE COURT 013‘ CEHATri‘ISGARH AT 'BILASPUR WRIT PETITEON No. 1014 of 2004 {’E'ITHONER : Chandrakali Bai Wife QfAtmnrakash. agsd about SO yeam, resiaent of Viilage Jarhabhata, Bilaspur Tehsii and District Bilasmxr (C.G.) VERSUS : 1“ Aabid Ali S/o Sabdar Ali? aged ‘45 years. 2. Rahmat Aii S/n Sabdar Aii, aged 35 years. 3a Nyaj Begum Wd/o Sabdasr Alia aged fxG year3. A11 resident of Jarhabhata, Biiaspur Tdasi} and Districi Bilaspur (CG) WRIT PE’I'YHON UNDER ARTICLE 2’26 OF IHE CGNS’I‘ITUI‘ION OF INDEA RE$ FONDENTS SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. 1 Present None for ihe pe‘iitioner. Shgi Praieek Shauna, Advecate for the reependems. ORAL ORDER {Paseed ennwlammday of Augugt, ZGOS) 1. The ma‘iter is called for hearing twice. None appears mr any represeniation is made on behalf ofthe eetitioner. 'ihe petitioaer may not be imerested in the \ matter. 2. In View ofthe above. the matter is dismissed for want efmosecution. Censequemiy, M(W)P No. 934/2004, aiso emnds di$pose(§ of, ‘ l .. 8d]- ‘ eSau'sh K. AgnihOtIi \ Judge Raga "