A' ^Lw^.,^i<^ ^lt?~,W^<h SlliBb Bg^^ /'. (L^{^1^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE , AT - BILASPUR [C.G.] WRIT PETITION No.^^^ /2006' PETITIONER ~^ Tapash Kumar Biswash.aged about 46 years ^ .^••''v-y''^'' S/0 Sri HN Biswas Posted as-Office Asstt.-3, >•"'- ^•'."1 ^••~' e^y ^'c-^^ cy ^ RESPONDENTS '-•'^ ',..Ji /-'"u ^••^'i^^ r"''^'' f / I ' -.i.>N' ^' ^^^" ^. CHC-Bilha,Bilaspur-Division,Distt.- Bilaspur,CG. VERSUS 1. State of CG Through Secretary.Deptt.af/ Health and FamilyWelfare.DKS Bhawan.Raipur [CG] 2. Director,/ Directorate Health Services.Chhattisgarh Raipur[CG] 3. Chief Medical and Health Officer, / Bilaspur-Division at Bilaspur, Distt.- Bilaspur [CG] ^''*<!l:?tte?<fe. ^^-^y^ \ ^ 4. Madhuri lata Shukla . OfRceAsstt.Gr.lll Directorate Health Services.C.G. Raipur,CG. WRIT PETITION U/ A - 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OFINDIA t^^W^I XI-HC-22 7S! -]||4|lcf4, »Tfltf'l<o,faciwy ^^.'s.s^^ • Rd«d aii^r^T f^iwa^ S(it<i'=b BtW sn^TTOITWBfef -11- Shri Ravish Verma, Shri Satish Gupta, Df No.1to3. None for respondent N| Heard. State Government vid (Annexure-P/1) posted the pefl Petitioner's contention one piace to other. Earlier he| (Annexure-P/2) and posted t(| his sen/ices were utilized at been posted to Jashpur. with the orders passed by tt case does not cover under sud Learned counsei for petitioner's wife is in Goverr therefore, husband and wife nearby areas. Petitioner was and they were separately ss transferred to Jashpur, he otherwise it is not a hard an< place. Petitioner's further conl she cannot be given proper petitioner's wife who is posl coipnsel forthe petitioner. Govt. Advocate for the *wlci4)-i tiiHcfl'ffto^tRiwK ^sri^Hsn^T 4. |e general transfer order dated 7-7-2006 ioner from Bilaspur to Jashpur. |s that he is being transferred frequently from was transferred vide order dated 11-8-2003 Bilha. Later on, without being transferred, iilaspur. Now vide impugned order he has Fre|quent transfer is not a ground for interfering |e Government. Even otherwise petitioner's jh an ailegation. the petitioner further contended that |ment service and is posted at Thakatpur, |should have been posted at one place or ^osted at Bilha and his wife at other place ^rving; therefore, now when he has been c^nnot take shelter of such a plea. Even fast rute to keep husband and wife at one ^ention is that his wife is ill and at Jashpur treatment. This is a lame excuse because t^d at Thakatpyr has not been disturbed. XI-HC-22 an^T^RT R-ii+ sh><]<»>(irea Gowri ^ a^aiCTRra', aTlltf'is, Riciitiy _^.s.^.^ R<>«d 3ii^TCTaTwaf?ff — "L- Petltioner's last content Madhuri Lata Shukla, he has has joined her duties on alloc) vide order dated 12-4-2006, Governmeht to post her any|i Bilaspur in place of petitioner tl|i- In my view, there is n< with the administrative order petition is liable to be dismisse|J Simine. Consequently,M.(W.).P|. :ion is that in order to accommodate Smt. )een transferred from Bilaspur. Smt. ShuRla ation from Madhya Pradesh to Chhattisgarh therefore, it was obligatory on the part of where. Accordingly, if she was posted to iat cannot be graded as mala fide. substantial material available to interfere passed by the Government, therefore, the summarily and is accordingly dismissed in <=HI^I<rl41'1 TTTO^TT ^T*tet^ <RI^<K ^S^ITSII^T No.4735 of 2006standsdlsgosedpf. Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge (ift^y^) ^