OM / IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAT ‘ AT BILAS PETITIONER # «.n n . ‘ .. w.P. No. 7.?15/2002 Raj Kumar Meghani A S/o Jeomal Sindhi, ‘ .‘h . .A . mm \ u Q” ?‘* a$' § w‘ x§ §$ESP0NDENTS / WP. UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF INDIA " Aged about 43 years Tehsil Simga Ward No. 10 Village Tilda Distt. Raipur (C..) VERSUS 1. Chief Municiple Officer Nagar Panchaya Simga Teh. Simga Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Sta of Chhattisgarh, Through Principle Secrary Deptt. of Revenue D.K. Bhawan Raipur. Tehsilda sga Distt aipur (C..) /r m R G URE OF CHHATIISGARH PUR w G te et OF CONSTITUTION t HIGH COURT OF CHHA‘ITISGARH AT BILASPUR sinqle Bench: Hon’ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Writ Petition No.74!) l 2002 PETITIONER Raj Kumar Meghani Versus RESPONDENTS Shri Mano} Faranjpe and Vikram Dixit, counse! iur the petitioner. $hr‘a Vinod Tekam, P.L. for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Air Chief Municipa: Officer and othe¥s. w?“ y, ORALoRnER (25.02.2010) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has filed'this writ petition seeking a relief that the respondents be restrainedfrgm ‘ ,1 evicting him from the disputed ehOp tiii the final decision. in the opinign of this Court, the retiei tor permanent injunction can only be soughtin é V properly constituted civil suit. (2) The instant writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as not maintainable, Even otherwise the facts stated in the writ petition is about rights and liabilities of the petitioner as weii as of the respondent- Municipal Councii in the capacity of the lessee and lessor which aiso V cannot be gone into in this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution , of indie. The instant petition thus fails and is hereby dismissed. Sdl- i Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge r.