1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 9931 OF 2010 *** 1. Heard Advocate Mr. V. R. Dhorde for Petitioner and Advocate Mr. S. P. Shah for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2. Trial Court has rejected application under section 10 C.P.C., moved by petitioner/ defendant, noticing that no documents enabling it to apply its mind to identity of issues involved were produced. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner has strenuously urged and attempted to demonstrate before this Court on the basis of documents filed before this Court along with writ petition such identity. It is apparent that the identity was required to be established before the trial Court and that has not been done. Thus, there is no jurisdictional error or perversity. Petition is, therefore, rejected. No costs. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:12/01/2011. ans/9931