RSA No.52 of 1995 alongwith RSA No.198 of 1995. 20.12. 2010 Present: Mr.Rajesh Mandhotra, Dy.A.G. for the State. Mr.Dhruv Shaunak, Advocate vice Ms.Ruma Kaushik, counsel for appellant in RSA No.198 of 1995. Mr.Karan Singh Kanwar, counsel for respondents No.1(a), 8, 9 and proposed LRs of respondents No.2&3. RSA No.198 of 1995: Steps in this appeal not taken. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as having been abated. RSA No.52 of 1995: In view of the fact that RSA No.198 of 1995 has been dismissed as abated, this appeal by the State which was a proforma defendant in the suit, does not survive. It is however, made clear that if the abatement in RSA No.198 of 1995 filed by the Municipal Council, Nahan is set-aside then this appeal shall also automatically be revived. Both the appeals are disposed of in the aforesaid terms. December 20, 2010 ( Deepak Gupta ), J. PV