IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47890 of 2008 BINOD KUMAR @ VINOD KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU. VIGILANCE. ----------- 2. 11.12.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Vigilance. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a Police case under Sections 409, 457, 471, 477A, 201, 109, 120B of the Penal Code read with Sections 13(2), 13(1) D of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The submission is that on the same allegations departmental proceedings were also drawn. In the proceeding finding has been arrived at that given the realities of the site, the variance in the estimate cannot be faulted on an accusation of exaggeration. The thickness of the materials used for construction of the road was according to accepted specifications. No scientific analysis of the stone chips had been done to conclude substandard quality. Royalty could not be deducted because of stay order of a court of law. The findings of the departmental proceedings are urged in support of the plea for anticipatory bail. Let the petitioner, abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Vigilance, Patna in Special Case No. 9 of 2001. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)