THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No.1254 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioners filed O.S.No.28 of 2005 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Markapur, Prakasam District against the respondents for partition and separate possession of the suit schedule properties. The recording of evidence of the parties was concluded and the suit was posted to 02.02.2011 for arguments. At that stage, the petitioners filed I.A.No.141 of 2011 with a prayer to recall D.W.1 for further cross- examination. The application was opposed by the respondent. The trial Court dismissed the I.A. through order, dated 11.02.2011. Hence, this revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. The affidavit filed in support of the I.A. is bereft of any reasons, on account of which the petitioners intended to further cross-examine D.W.1. With the closure of evidence, valuable rights accrue to the respective parties. It is only when the party is prevented or precluded from taking any further steps of cross-examination, that there exists possibility for the Court to recall such a witness. Time and again, this Court held that the aspects, on which a party proposes to further cross-examine a witness, whose evidence is already closed, must be clearly stated. As observed earlier, in this case, the petitioners did not state any reason whatever for recalling D.W.1. The trial Court has taken correct view of the matter. The suit was identified for disposal and it cannot wait any longer. Therefore, the civil revision petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 01.07.2011 Jsu THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No.1254 of 2011 Date: 01.07.2011 JSU