THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.9974 of 2010 Dated:28.04.2010 Between: M.Ammanni, And others. …Petitioners And The District Collector, Chittoor District, Chittoor, And others. ...Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.9974 of 2010 ORDER: The third respondent by proceedings dated 08.01.2010 ordered resumption of land in survey Nos.159/2, 160/1, 160/2, 161/1 and 161/2. The petitioners claim that these lands were gifted by petitioner No.1 in favour of her daughters, petitioner Nos.2 to 6, and petitioner No.1 in turn got the property from her grandfather. Be that as it is, the petitioners assailed the order of the Tahsildar in W.P.No.1110 of 2010. This Court disposed of the same on 27.01.2010 in the following manner. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the remedy of appeal and the 3rd respondent or his subordinates shall not take any steps against the petitioner to dispossess her till the expiry of 90 days. It is also directed that in case the petitioner prefers an appeal within the stipulated time, the order of resumption shall stand stayed during the pendency of the appeal… Thereafter, the petitioners filed appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer and the same is pending. In the meanwhile, alleging that the Tahsildar is not allowing the petitioners to take away the mango crop in the land, they filed the instant writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to allow the petitioners to cut the mango crop. After hearing the Counsel for petitioners and the Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignment) this Court is convinced that the writ petition is not a proper remedy. As directed by this Court in W.P.No.1110 of 2010, the petitioners already filed an appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer. Further, even this Court also stayed the order of the Tahsildar. Therefore, the petitioners may bring this to the notice of the Revenue Divisional Officer and obtain appropriate orders. If there is a serious objection by the Tahsildar, the petitioners can also file a contempt case. This writ petition is misconceived. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 28.04.2010 Note: Issue C.C by tomorrow. B/o. vs