1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.220 OF 2008 Municipal Labour Union .. Petitioner V/s Thane Municipal Corporation & Ors. .. Respondents Smt.Neeta Karnik for the Petitioner. Mr.R.S.Apte i/by Mr.N.R.Bubna for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr.C.S.Patil i/by Mr.I.S.Thakur for Respondent No.3. CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. DATE: 18th November, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. The breach alleged in the contempt petition is of the following part of the order dated 26.3.2007:- “In the meantime, the respondent No.2 to direct the contractors who are engaged to continue the members of the petitioner union who are presently working to the extent that they are required and based on their seniority and also disciplinary rights till such time the decision is taken by the appropriate Government. The appropriate Government to complete the exercise within a period of six months from today.” 2. Perusal of the averments made in the contempt petition shows that there is no specific allegation as against 2nd Respondent in the writ petition regarding the breach of the aforesaid direction. There is no direction issued by the Division Bench as against Respondent Nos.3 & 4. Therefore on the basis of averments made in this petition, action under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 cannot be initiated. It is for the petitioner to adopt appropriate proceedings for redressal of its grievances. Petition is disposed of. (A.S.OKA, J.)