FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.235 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr.Prakash Naik for the applicant. Mr.S.A.Shaikh, A.P.P. for respondent no.1. Mr.S.V.Marwadi for resp. nos.2 to 6. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : APRIL 19, 2010. P.C.: The present Revision Application challenges the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge thereby partly disallowing the application filed by the prosecution under section 311 of the Cr.P.C. The apex Court in the case of Sethuraman v. Rajamanickam [2009 All MR (Cri.) 1588 (SC)] has held that an application under section 311 is an interlocutory order and, therefore, not amenable to revisional jurisdiction. 2. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Revision Application is rejected. B.R. GAVAI, J.