IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 10997 of 2008. Decided on: 24.12.2010. Amar Nath. ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal, Pradesh and others. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Sunny Dhatwalia, Advocate, Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.K.Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. Sunny Dhatwalia, learned vice counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) December 24, 2010. Judge (krt) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.