IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-26062 of 2009 Date of decision : 10.12.2009 Lakhwinder Singh and others …. Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another …. Respondents and Crl. Misc. No. M-31888 of 2009 Date of decision : 10.12.2009 Surjit Singh and others …. Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another …. Respondents Present: Mrs. G. K. Mann, Advocate for the petitioners in Crl. Misc. No.M-26062 of 2009. Mr. H. S. Sangha, Advocate for the petitioners in Crl. Misc. No.M-31888 of 2009. Mr. P.S. Grewal, AAG, Punjab. **** S.S. SARON, J. This order will dispose of Crl. Misc. No.M-26062 of 2009 filed by Lakhwinder Singh and others against the State of Punjab and Baldev Singh and Crl. Misc. No. M-31888 of 2009 filed by Surjit Singh and others against the State of Punjab and Sukhwinder Singh @ Bhola. Crl. Misc. No. M-26062 of 2009 and [2] Crl. Misc. No. M-31888 of 2009 Crl. Misc. No. M-26062 of 2009 has been filed for quashing of FIR No.251 dated 17.8.2002 (Annexure P1) registered at Police Station Lopoke, Police District Majitha for the offences under Sections 326, 325, 323, 148 and 149 Indian Penal Code (IPC-for short). Crl. Misc. No. M-31888 of 2009 has been filed for quashing of complaint No.121 dated 19.10.2006 (Annexure P-1) titled Sukhwinder Singh v. Surjit Singh and others pending in the Court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Amritsar and the summoning order dated 7.2.2003 (Annexure P2). The quashing of the FIR and the complaint have been sought on the basis of compromise (Annexure P3) reached at between the parties. During the course of hearing, it is admitted case between the parties that the evidence in the cases has been led and the cases are now fixed for arguments. In the circumstances, at this stage to quash FIR No.251 dated 17.8.2002 (Annexure P1) in Crl. Misc. No.M-26062 of 2009 and the impugned complaint dated 19.10.2006 (Annexure P1) in Crl. Misc. No.M-31888 of 2009 would be inappropriate. The petitioners in both the respective petitions may if so advised submit before the learned trial Court regarding the compromise that has been effected and urge for taking the same into consideration at the time of passing sentences in case they are held to be guilty and are convicted. Accordingly, Crl. Misc. No.M-26062 of 2009 and Crl. Misc. No. M-31888 of 2009, are dismissed. Crl. Misc. No. M-26062 of 2009 and [3] Crl. Misc. No. M-31888 of 2009 (S.S. SARON) JUDGE December 10, 2009 amit