o;i^ys^ B^ftGll c^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. 4-3^-72004 PETITIONER SMT. MEENA RAMTEKE ;ed ^^" RESPONDENTS ;-":^....- -.. J< ritV^ W/o Shri Bhojendra Ramteke , aged A^i...y<£^ about 35 Years R/o Village - ^•"'"^^•'°'" ...••"* ^"y\.^\ Antagarh, Distt. - Kanker , Chhattisgarh, VERSUS 1. TheStateofC.G. Through the Secretary of Department of Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector Kanker (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Kanlcer 4. Deputy Director Education Department Raipur(C.G.) ^^ :A WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI ETC OR ANY OTHER DIRCTIONS OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER L_-_.-.-— XI-HC—78 ^ssr ^ii^3<nq, ^tii^^Ko, f®t<ns^(i< IX) ttffl^TT 5ti*j|c^ > ^tii^4i<o, f®t<ns^(i- M3<?^: 200 ^TT^?TTT5RT (^q^q^T) ^TT^T '5R f^-lich ^^\ ^Ti^^TbF \" 108-12-2004 ^TT^TT TT^cf 3?R^7 Koilebfeda Smt. Renu Kc^har, Couasel Shri Sudhir Agrawal, Paxiel AppUcation for urgent hearin|g Heaid. Leamed counsel for fhe |relates to transfer of tlie petitione^ petitioner has been transferrcd |Aata^arh to Middle School, j(Axinexurc-P/1), She also submit^ |intercsted person m fhe place of Ibeen traasferred- She also sul jrequests and representations jrespondeHts authorities are not (petitioner, She also submits fhat f<{ |be given aii opportunily of filing [the competent authorily of the] lconsidered on its own inerits ia Haviag considered and |the incrits of the case, iii the IwiU be served if a direction is jdetailed rcpresentation raising herj jaufhority of the rcspondents alon^ |this order, withia 15 days, aad oii| |the compctent authoxity of the wifliout Qpiopn gi+en ^Fnfepfl^r 1TFR??f ^f 1^x^t <Pn^i< ^ 3tf?R 3TI^T for the petitioner, Ljawyer for ffae State. is allowed. pel^tioner submits that the matter r. She ftuther submits that tfae ffom. Higher Secondaxy Schc^l, vide order dated 24-9-2004 aait^ that ordv fo accoimaaiodate the Ipie petttioner, fhe petitioner has l|>mits that iaspite of repeated ^aade by fhe petitioner the |considered fhe request of the ^r fhe prcsent fhe petitioner may detaited representation before rcspondents, which shaJl be acAordaace with law< expressmg aiiy opmion on of this Court^ ends ofjustice gifeii to fhe petitioner to malce a Igrievanees before fhe competent wifb. a copy of the petition and sucli representatioa beiag filed, re^pondeiits shaU decide the saiue tilie XI.HG—78 ;P7, ^tll^^Ko, f®|<y1S^I^< ^f H3.c?^[^/ ^~^[';:?TR^P7, ^tli^^Ko, f®|<y1S^I^< HI*<^11 »»»lich 200 ^n^T'q'^F (^cji^^r) STI^T ^57 f^'lJob "^^H 3?T^^rfoF '^nwHf^^n^r —'2. cbi^t<rt4I1<l HH<r?j '^f^^t' <P»i<^i< ^3tfwaii^T Goum. jri^ ^ o? ^ oii its own merits in accordande prefeiably \vitihdn two montlis rcpreseutation. Leamed counsel for th^ petitioner has not been rclieved, be aUowed to continue. It is directed tfaat iffhe other person has notjomed m xaav be aUowed to continue tiai niade clear that if the petitioner person has alrcady joined in placje not entitle the petitioner to rejoia With fhe aforesaid obsfc disposed o£ Consequenfly, M,W,P.No,- Certified copy as per rules. c|e wifh. law as early as possible $;om the date of receipt of the petltloner submits fhat the ^he prays. fhat tiie petitioner may I^1|itioner pl4ce t^e lias has not beea rcMeved and of the petitioner, the petitioner representation is decided, It is already been relieved or other offhe petitioner, this orderwill ^t the earlier place of posting. bs^nration, fhis petition stands 47[42/ 2004 also staads disposed of Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge