iiGii CCDURT OF CHHAT‘TESGARH AT E§LAS¥9E¥R W.P.gC) KO. ’7014j2007 1V1] s, Agrawal Industries, Through ?ETK’TIONER : Its pragaiietor N.K‘Agrawai, Agsd about 45 years, R/o. Ramsagar Para, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) Vs. RESPGNEBENTS Union of India, Through: Ministry of Coal, New Delhi 2. Coal India Limited, Through: Its Chairman, 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Koikata 3. Scum Eastern Coal Fields Limited, Through: Chief Managing Director, SECL, Bilaspur SECL, 4. Director Technical Bilaspur {CG} Ul General Manager Sales, SECL, Bilaspur (CG) 6. Chief Sales manager, SECL, Bilaspur (CG) WRIT PETITIGN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTEON GE? ENQIA 1S3: Hon’ble Mr. $atis§1 K. Agnihotti, J.) Shri Y. GSharma, cormsel for the petitioner. Smt. vBRJViaity, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri S.K.Beriwa1, counsel for respomlent No. 1} Union of india Shlj P.S.Koshy, couasei for respondents No. 2 to 6. GRAL QWER (Passed on this 26TH day of November 2007) Learned counsel appealing for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner being Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 504/ 2005 (South Eastern Coalfields Limited 8n Others Vs. Agrawal Structure Mills Pvt. Limited and Another) was considered along with other Civil Appeals and Writ Petition by the Supreme Court in judgment and order dated 1.12.2006, in which certain directions have been passed. E . . passed by the Supreme Couxt (Supra). 111 View ofthe fbregoing submission, Shrj PS. Koshy, Advocate, who is dimcted to app6ar 0a behalf of respond€ntjauthormbs «SECL submits that as psr submission of the pefifioner, thé app1icat1‘on OO filEd by him 1's pemiing bsfore respondent N08 to 6, without making any observation it would suffice that tbs pending 5302f 2006 along with others as early as possible. ‘ r‘ Satish K. Agnihotri J 3 Accordingiy, the petition stands disposed of. I Sd/ H