IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.W.J.C. No. 6803 of 2009 M/S for ever For Sight Info.com being having its registered office at additional Arcade Room No. 437, Fraser Road, Patna, being represented by it’s proprietor Rishi Kapoor, S/O Late Brij Mohan .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The Deputy Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 4. The District Magistrate, Madhepura 5. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Madhepura .. Respondents With C.W.J.C. No. 6810 of 2009 M/S for ever For Sight Info.com being having its registered office at additional Arcade Room No. 437, Fraser Road, Patna, being represented by it’s proprietor Rishi Kapoor, S/O Late Brij Mohan .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The Deputy Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2 4. The District Magistrate, Madhepura 5. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Katihar .. Respondents With C.W.J.C. No. 6811 of 2009 M/S for ever For Sight Info.com being having its registered office at additional Arcade Room No. 437, Fraser Road, Patna, being represented by it’s proprietor Rishi Kapoor, S/O Late Brij Mohan .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The Deputy Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 4. The District Magistrate, Madhepura 5. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Munger .. Respondents **** /2/ 03.06.2009 Petitioner has prayed for quashing letter no. 3026, dated 17.04.2009, issued by the Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, directing the Deputy Development Commissioners, Munger, Madhepura and Katihar, to allot work of BIS and MIS to some private agencies. Petitioner has not been able to show 3 that previously the State Government had entered into any agreement with the petitioner allotting the work of BIS and MIS. Petitioner claims to be sub-contractor of M/S Webel Technology, Ranchi, and his claim is that after the agreement with M/S Webel Technology, Ranchi, was cancelled he was allowed to continue with the work. Since, the petitioner has never entered into any agreement with the respondents, no right has accrued to him and he can not claim of infringement of any right. However, counsel for the petitioner submits that a huge amount has been invested. If that is so, he may represent before the concerned authority. They will consider it. With these observations and directions, this application is disposed off. Cp:2/S.A. (Mridula Mishra, J.)