pr-- ••-»WEfiap -fer^^4-- &-^w (2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^ ^ /200fi 7- PETITIONERS •^' . k-y/ .^/ s*'' /^•^ /'...yr)'<y ^••y/" ,*x-' ^ .. vy ^o^ -^^ ^:W* ^ RESPONDENTS ,1. Smt Nirmala Khurshyam W/o Shn'Y.S. Khurshyam Age about 39 years, AssistantTeacher, Govt. PrimarySchool, Mudpar, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) 2. SmtMamtaYadav W/oShriM.LYadav Age about 38 years, AssistantTeacher, ~ Govt.(T.W.D.) Primary School, Amliduggu, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) 3. Smt. Geeta Sharma W/o Shri Chandra Kumar Sharma Age about 37 years, AssistantTeacher, Govt. Boys Primary School, Andheri Kachhar, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) 4. Smt. Jamuna Rajwade S/o Shri Dukhbhan Rajwade Age about 38 years, AssistantTeacher, Govt. Girls Primary School,Korba, Distt.-Korba (C.G.) VERSUS State Government of Chhattisgarh Through:- Secretary, Tribal & Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Korba (C.G.) District Education Officer Korba (C.G.) (3) 4. BIock Education Officer Korba, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) WRIT PET1TION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS^ARH AT BILASPUR W. P. fS) No. 67 of 2007 Petitioners : Smt. Nirmala Khurdiyam A others Versus ftespondents : State ^ovemmatt of Chhatt-isgarh ond others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agrohotri, J 5hri ^jay Shrivastava, Adwoate for the (»titioner. 5hri Arvind Dubey, Poinel lawyer for the re^ondents/Staite. OROER (Passed on 15th ctay of January, 2007) The foliowing order of the Court is pas^d by Satish K. Ayrihotri. J. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners as well <xs learned Panel Uxwyer appearing for the re^ondents/State Jointly aibmit that the facts of the present case are similar to -riiat of in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006 (Sushil Tiwari & others Vs. State eovt. of Chhanisgarh A o-ther^), which was altowed vide order dated 7th November, 2006. They further submit that the question of taw involved is also the same. 2. In view of tiie above stated ^jbmissions niocle by teamed counsel for the parties. the writ petition is allowed in terms of tiie order dated 7th November, 2006 poissed by -this Court in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006. No order as to costs. Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge w^\ y?—l