IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3637 of 2006. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3637 of 2006. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3637 of 2006. IN IN IN SUIT NO.2779 of 2006. SUIT NO.2779 of 2006. SUIT NO.2779 of 2006. M/s.Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. ..Plaintiff versus Mr.Bhore Rajabhan Vishnu & Ors. ..Defendants Mr.S.A.Oak i/b. Mahesh Menon & Co. for the Plaintiff in support of Notice of Motion. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 5th January, 2009. DATED : 5th January, 2009. DATED : 5th January, 2009. P.C. 1. None for the defendant, though served. By this motion diverse reliefs are sought. Defendants have been served. However, they are absent before the Court and no affidavit in reply is filed . As motion was called out for hearing, learned Advocate for the plaintiffs pointed out that by Order dated 23.1.2007 this Court has directed the Court Receiver to take physical possession of the suit flat and that order has been complied with and today the possession is with the Court Receiver. 2. Learned Counsel for the plaintiffs -2- submitted that the appointment of Court Receiver be confirmed in order to protect the interest of the plaintiffs. He did not press for relief apart from relief of appointment of Court Receiver as set out in the prayer clause. Hence the Order. ORDER . Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (c). . Motion is dismissed so far as prayer clause (a), (b), (d) and (e) are concerned. . There shall be no order as to costs. . Suit to come up in usual course. (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.)