IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12807 of 2010 SANJAY SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 30.6.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Udwant Nagar P.S. Case No.230 of 2004 (T.R. No. 2966 of 2007) for offence punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471 and 420/120B of the Indian Penal Code. Substance of allegation against this petitioner as set out in the F.I.R. is that he forged the signature of the informant for securing the release of the vehicle which has been seized by reason of an accident. It is further alleged that the petitioner also signed on the Vakalatnama and the other connected papers. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation set out in the F.I.R. is not correct, since even according to the informant the vehicle was sold to his father Hardwar Singh. He further with reference to the sale letter present at Annexure-2 of the application submits that the veracity of the said document itself appears doubtful for the reason that though the stamp paper was obtained on 13.8.1999, for a sale taking place on 10.1.1997. He submits that the 2 informant with ill motive of escaping the law arising out of the claim case has instituted the present case. He further submits that the petitioner has been remained in custody since 9.11.2009. Taking into consideration the circumstances and the submissions advanced, let the petitioner, namely Sanjay Singh be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Kumar Raghvendra Juddicial Magistrate, Ist class Ara in connection with Udwant Nagar P.S. Case no. 230 of 2004 (Tr. No. 2966 of 2007) subject to the condition that the petitioner shall be attending the trial of the case on each and every date fixed without any break and upon failure on the part of the petitioner to attend the Court below on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the trial Court would entitle the Court concerned to initiate proceeding for cancellation of his bail bonds and for taking him into custody. Anand Kr. (Jyoti Saran, J.)