IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 16306 of 2008 Between: Dr. K. Vijaya Sarathi S/o. K.V. Krishnamachary Govt. Ayurvedic Dispensary, Marikal, Mahaboobnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Registrar, Dr. N.T.R. University of Health Services, Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada. 2 The Commissioner, Department of Ayush, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by is Secretary (H.M. & F.W.) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order more in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to allot a seat in M.D. (Ayurveda) and admit the petitioner into MD (Ayurveda) and the Rules issued in G.O.Ms.No.603 (HM&FW) R-2 Department, dt. 28.12.2004 and also letter of the Commissioner Department of Ayush, A.P. Hyderabad 2nd respondent herein vide letter No.34/CD(Ayush) Peshi/2006, dated 21.06.2006 and consequently declare the prospectus for admission into M.D. (Ayurveda) courses for the Academic Sessions 2008-09 in respect of seats shown for in service candidates as four in number as in Rule3(7) of prospectus is contrary to the Rules issued in G.O.Ms.No.603 (HM&FW) (R2) Department, dt. 28.12.2004, illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and also the letter of the Commissioner Department of Ayush, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad vide Letter No.34/CD(Ayush) Peshi/2006, dated 21.06.2006. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.RANGANADH RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.D.V.NAGARJUNA BABU The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No : 16306 of 2008 O R D E R : It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J Dated: 23-04-2009 KLP