I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAI PUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil W r it Pet it ion No.5 1 1 / 2 0 0 3 Heera Lal S/ o late Shri Hardev and Another Ver su s Hanuman S/ o Jaisa Kumhar and Others Dat e of Or der ::: 19 .0 5 .2 0 08 Present Hon 'ble Mr . Ju st ice Nar en dr a Ku m ar Jain Shri D.P. Pujari, Counsel for petitioners Shri K.K. Mehrishi, Counsel for respondent No.1 Ms. Manju Dave, Addl. Govt. Counsel for respondent No.2 State # # # # By t h e Cou r t : - Heard learned counsel for the parties. The plaintiff-respondent No.1 filed a suit for declaration and division of disputed property in the trial court wherein the defendant-petitioners contested the suit 0n the ground that the disputed property is self-acquired property of the defendant and is not an ancestral property of the parties, therefore, the suit of the plaintiff is liable to be dismissed. The trial court recorded a finding that the disputed property is an ancestral property and is liable to be divided in between both the parties and consequently decreed the suit of the plaintiff-respondent. Being aggrieved with the same, an appeal was preferred by the defendant before the appellate authority but the same was dismissed; thereafter the second appeal, preferred by the defendant, was also dismissed by the Revenue Board. All the three courts have recorded a finding of fact that the disputed property was an ancestral property. The suit has been decreed by all the three courts below. I do not find any illegality in the said finding of all the courts below so as to interfere in the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed in limine. ( Nar en dr a Ku m ar Jain ) J. / / Jaiman/ /