THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.10414 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the proceeding No.B2/1674/2004, dated 21.04.2010 of the third respondent, as illegal and arbitrary. It is the case of the petitioner that she has been appointed as Fair Price Shop Dealer of Anthargaon Village, Kahler Mandal, Medak District on 02.10.2003 and since then she had been distributing the commodities to the cardholders as per the instructions of the respondents. While so, some of the villagers, at the instigation of the Sarpanch, have lodged a false complaint with the third respondent against her. Hence, the third respondent issued a show cause notice dated 24.07.2004, to which she had submitted a detailed reply. Thereafter, the third respondent cancelled her authorization by order dated 19.04.2008. Aggrieved by the same, she preferred an appeal before the first respondent, who set aside the order dated 19.04.2008 and remanded the case to the third respondent for fresh enquiry. On such remand, the third respondent, after taking into consideration the explanation submitted by the petitioner, by order dated 18.11.2009 imposed a fine of Rs.2,000/- and restored her authorization. Pursuant to the said order, she paid the amount in State treasury. Thereafter, she made an application to the fourth respondent on 20.11.2009 to permit her to pay the amounts necessary for release of commodities by demand draft, and the fourth respondent permitted her to pay the amount, by making an endorsement on the said application. In compliance of the same, she has taken out three demand drafts and submitted the same to the fourth respondent for release of the commodities. However, the third respondent issued the impugned proceeding dated 21.04.2010 stating that the release of the stocks to the petitioner cannot be considered as her authorization expired on 31.03.2005, and that a revision petition filed by one Pandarinath Patil against the order dated 18.11.2009 passed by the third respondent, is pending. Hence, this writ petition. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that during the pendency of the writ petition fresh authorization has been granted in favour of the petitioner, and therefore, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. N.V. RAMANA, J Date: 07.07.2010 va