IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9821 of 2002 GYANDHARI MANDAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5. 24.02.2010 This case has been brought under the heading “To Be Mentioned” at the instance of counsel for the petitioner who would point out that in the order dated 8.7.2009 at page 3 in the extracted portion of the final order in Hindi, there has been a typographical mistake inasmuch as Gyandhari Mandal has been described as “HAaMkjd” whereas he was actually holding the post of “laxzkgd”. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that on account of this typing mistake the order of this Court has not been complied till date. While this court must hold that the said expression “HAaMkjd” at page 3 of order dated 8.7.2009 is an inadvertent typographical mistake as would be apparent from reading of Annexure-4, it is really shocking to this court to find that respondents have not complied the order dated 8.7.2009 only on account of aforementioned typographical mistake inasmuch as even otherwise, the 2 respondents were supposed to know of the post held by the petitioner. Be that as it may, at page 3 of order dated 8.7.2009, the word “HAaMkjd ” will be read as “laxzkgd ” and the order of this court is modified to this extent only. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)