IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38426 of 2009 1. Shital Paswan, Son of Late Dukhit Paswan. 2. Sima Devi, wife of Shital Paswan. Both are resident of Village-Gudhma, P.S.-Sarairanjan, District- Samastipur. …………Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. …………Opp. Party. ----------- 2/ 18.12.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the complainant. The case has been instituted for offence under Sections 323, 504, 380, 498A of the IPC and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Counsel for the petitioners submits that entire allegations are false and concocted. The husband of the complainant had filed matrimonial case No. 167 of 2008 for restitution of conjugal rights, in which complainant has appeared by filing written statement and in the reconciliation proceeding has refused to live with her husband. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of above named petitioners is allowed. They are directed to be released on bail, in case of their appearance, within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S. D.J.M. Samastipur in connection with Complaint Case No. 809 2 of 2008 subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)