IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-30218 of 2009 Date of decision:17.12.2009. Gurmeet Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. J.S.Mehandiratta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Neena Madan, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The petitioner is Jeth of the deceased lady. The husband and parents-in-law of the deceased lady are already in custody. The plea for bail presently has been filed on behalf of the Jeth. The averment on behalf of the petitioner that the police did not even seek his police remand is not contested on behalf of the State. Without expression of any opinion on the merits of the case, the petition shall stand allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/CJM/Duty Magistrate concerned. December 17, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE