.^^^> ^ v^gy j | «>;-!- ^•^s^ <- HLGHC_OURTOFCHHATTlSQAR_H,-.BiLASPyR Sanjeet Sinha, S/o Shri Asnok Sinha, aged about 18 years, R/o i'/aji Marg, Tikrapara, Silaspur, District Biiaspur (G.G.) 2 3 State of Ch'nattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Schooi Education D..K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) The Divisiona! Officer, C.G. toard of Secondar^' Education, Biiaspur(C.G.) C.G. Board of Secondary iducation Pension Bada, Raipur throuah English Medium The Princlps!, Pushp< Higher Secondary )1, Bilaspur, Siiaspur (C.G.) •if r;r^M i^t^i'y li •ttiirfty"!. ^y-^.y^f^s, = '•f^sai a^-s.B: « Mrs. Renu Kochar, Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for respondent No.1. Mr. H.B. Agawai, Senior Advocate with Mrs. Meera Jaiswal, Counsel for respondents 2 & 3. Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Counsel for respondent No.4. 'NHA. J. Heard. Petitioner - Sanieet Sinha has folldvying rellefs : led this petition for the o Kinaiy caii Tor reiating to the petitioner's Engiish Medium High of the case, ion in 'Pushpraj Secondary School, i/2011 Bilaspur', for kind perusa! of this Hon'ble High Court. (ii) Tha:, this Hon'ble 1-iigh Court may kindly issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directine respondent Board to issue admit card to the petitioner, and ailow him to give exam of Class XII from C.G. High Secondary Board. (iii) That, this Hon'ble Court may issue a writ in the nature of Certlorari and quash the Annexure P/3 and permlt the petitioner to appear in exam ot' XII. (iv) That, this HQn'ble Court may pass any other order/direction, which Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper." The petffioner, thus, in substance is praying for issuance of adm't card to him for appearing in CIass-XI examination from C.G. Boardof Secondar/ Education. By the communication dated 09.02.2011, the Board has informed the petitioner through the concerned Institution that the petitioner has already passed Class-XII examination from Central Board of Secondan/ Education, therefore, he cannot be allowed to re-appear in Class-Xil examination from C.G. Board of Secondary Education. Mr. H.B. Agrav/al, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of respondents 2 & 3 submits that if a student has atready passed Class-Xl' examination, he cannot be permitted to appear in the same examination in the next session. 1-1 e further submits that if a student wants to appear in the examination to improve his division, he can appear from the same Board throuah which he has cleared the earlier examination. He also submits that presently, 4 papers of •IQN {Ci Class-Xli examination are already over, th has now become infructuous. !n view of the above submisslons i not find any substance in the writ petition. The writ petition is liable to be dingiy dismissed. order as to cost(s). Ition Mr. Agrawal, 1 do lismissed and is Sd/- Kumar Judge snvna