IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1002 of 2009 PALTU SHARMA @ NARENDRA KUMAR SHARMA & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 16.8.2010 The petitioners pray for quashing the F.I.R. of Mojahidpur P.S. Case No.88 of 2009 for an offence under sections 341, 323, 406, 354, 505/34 of the Penal Code. It is alleged by the informant Gayatri Devi, respondent no.8, on 25.8.2009 when she demanded rent from petitioner no.1, he started abusing her telling that her husband has executed the land in his favour. It is further alleged that petitioner no.1 and his brother-in-law Parmanand Sharma, petitioner no.2, has assaulted her. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that respondent no.8 Gyatri Devi has lodged a concocted case against them. He submits that Sunil Sharma, the husband of the informant (Respondent no.8) has sold out the land with house in favour of wife of the petitioner no.1 namely Renu Sharma vide sale deed dated 26.8.2008, contained in Annexure-2, about one year back on valid consideration and since the purchase, the petitioner no.1 is coming in peaceful possession of the same. He further submits that petitioner no.1 even applied for supply of electricity and connection was also provided on 20.8.2009, contained in Annexure-3. Thus, he submits that the F.I.R. is tainted and the prosecution should be quashed. 2 KHAN Counsel for the petitioners submits that as per his instruction the police has submitted final form in their favour. In case if investigation is still pending, it would be open to the petitioners to file a representation before the Investigating Officer of the case stating their part of the case. With the aforesaid liberty, this application is disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J)