1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.: 10829 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL [St] NO.: 19614 OF 2008 [United India Ins. Co. Ltd. V/s P. Gauri & anr.] 1. We have heard learned counsel Mr. Kulkarni for the Applicant and Advocate Mr. Karpe for the Respondent No.2. Office report shows that notice of Respondent No.1 is refused. Respondent No.1 did not accept the notice. Refusal of the notice by Respondent No.1, may be treated as served. With this, we have heard learned counsel for the Applicant. By this application, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of about 60 days occurred in filing appeal in this Court. After hearing learned counsel for respective parties and considering the grounds raised in the application, we are satisfied that the delay is unintentional and case for condonation of said delay is established. 2. Civil application is allowed. Delay of 60 days occurred in filing the appeal in this Court stands condoned. Application accordingly stands disposed of. 3. List the appeal for admission after one week. [S. S. SHINDE, J.] [S. B. DESHMUKH, J.] Dated:07/07/2009. ans/10829