CR No.2537 of 2001 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.2537 of 2001 Date of Decision: 14 - 12 - 2010 Gian Singh ....Petitioner v. Gurcharan Singh ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA *** Present: Mr.K.S.Cheema, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Parveen Kumar, Advocate for the respondent. *** KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the parties are in agreement that the Rent Controller had not provisionally assessed the rent and no opportunity was given to the tenant-respondent to deposit the rent. Hence, it is submitted that the Rent Controller had wrongly ordered eviction of the tenant- respondent which had been set aside by the Appellate Authority. Counsel for the parties have taken a very fair stand that in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Rakesh Wadhawan v. M/s.Jagdamba Industrial Corporation, 2002(5) SCC 440, the Rent Controller be directed to assess the provisional rent alongwith interest and cost. CR No.2537 of 2001 [2] Hence, the present revision petition is accepted. The matter is remanded back to the Rent Controller to try the eviction petition afresh after following the due procedure as laid down in Rakesh Wadhawan's case (supra). The parties are directed to appear before the Rent Controller on 6.1.2011. The Rent Controller is directed to decide the eviction petition within six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. ( KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA ) December 14, 2010. JUDGE RC