IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1388 (S/S) of 2007 (1) Anuj Kumar Jain S/o Late Sri Chaman Lal Jain R/o House No. 18, Street No. 2, Jagdish Nagar, Near Sector II Barrier, Jwalapur, Haridwar. (2) Smt. Asha Sharma W/o Sri Anil Kumar Sharma R/o Purani Sabzi Mandi, Jwalapur, Haridwar. (3) Smt. Indu Bala W/o Sri Rakesh Kumar R/o House No. 25, Jagdish Nagar, Jwalapur, Haridwar. (4) Ashok Kumar Sharma S/o Sri Prayag Dutt Sharma R/o 238, Purva Dindayal, Roorkee, Haridwar. (5) Kumari Abha Rani D/o Sri Prayag Dutt Sharma R/o 238, Purva Dindayal, Roorkee, Haridwar. …………… Petitioners. Versus (1) State of Uttarakhand through its Secretary, Ministry of Education, Civil Secretariat, Dehradun. (2) State Council of Education Research and Training Uttaranchal, Narendra Nagar, Tehri Garhwal. (3) Director (Incharge), Vidhyalayi Shiksha, Uttarakhand. …………… Respondents. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard Sri Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. (2) By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 07.08.2007, passed by respondent no. 3. A mandamus has also been sought directing respondents to admit the petitioners for Special B.T.C. course. (3) It appears that in the earlier round of litigation, Writ Petition No. 880 (S/S) of 2005 along with connected writ petitions in the matter were heard and disposed of vide order dated 25.07.2006. By said order, it was directed that if the petitioners fulfill the conditions prescribed by National Council for Teacher Education, the petitioners may be considered in the light of the various judgments of the Supreme Court. The impugned order, copy of which is Annexure 5 to the writ petition, shows that in compliance of aforesaid order dated 25.07.2006, the matter of the petitioners was considered and the representations are rejected. The reasons mentioned in the impugned order are quoted below:- ^^ek0 U;k;ky; ds vkns’k ds vuqikyu esa uSlfxZd U;k; dh n`f”Vdksa.k ls ;kphx.kksa dks lquokbZ gsrq funZs’kky; esa vkeaf=r fd;k x;kA lquokbZ ds nkSjku ;kphx.kksa }kjk viuh vf/kd mez dk gokyk nsrs gq, lkekU; oxZ esa Hkh jkT; Lrjh; dkmfUlfyax dh ekax dh xbZA muds )kjk bl lEca/k esa ‘kklukns’k izLrqr fd;k x;k tks vuqlwfpr tkfr] tu tkfr ,oa fiNM+h tkfr dh vUrZtuinh; dkmUlfyax ls lEcaf/kr gSA bl lEca/k esa muds )kjk ,l0lh0bZ0vkj0Vh0 }kjk izdkf’kr foKfIr;ksa dh izfr;ka Hkh izLrqr dh xbZA izdj.k ij lE;d fopkjksijkUr ,d gh fLFkfr mHkj dj lkeus vkrh gS fd ^^D;k ;kphx.k vUrZtuinh; dkmUlfyax gsrq vgrZ gSa ftldh ekax muds )kjk ;kfpdk esa dh tk jgh gS \** i=koyh esa ijh{k.kksaijkUr ,sls dksbZ Hkh rF; lkeus ugha vkrs ftlds vk/kkj ij ;kphx.kksa gsrq vUrZtuinh; dkmfUlfyxa dh O;oLFkk dh tk;A vUrZtuinh; dkmfUlfyax dh O;oLFkk fofHkUu tuinksa esa vuqlwfpr tkfr] tu tkfr ,oa fiNMh tkfr ds inks ij lhVks dks Hkjus ds fy, gSA u fd lkekU; oxZ ds fy,] rFkkfi bl lEcU/k esa ;g rF; Hkh egRoiw.kZ gS fd ftyk loZx gksus ds dkj.k ftys Lrj ij lhVks dks iw.kZ :i ls Hkjs tkus ds mijkUr gh vuqlwfpr tkfr] tu tkfr ,oa fiNMh tkfr dh fjDr lhVks ds fy, dkmfUlfyax dk izkok/kku fd;k x;k gSA ‘kklukns’k fnukad 13-06-2006 ds vuqikyu esa o”kZ 2006 dh fc0ch0Vh0lh0 p;u izfd;k izkjEHk djrs gq, fnukad 09-07-2006 dks foKfIr izdkf’kr dh xbZA mDr ‘kklukns’k ,oa foKfIr fnukad 01 tqykbZ] 2006 dks vf/kdre vk;q lhek 40 o’kZ fu/kkZfjr dh xbZA “kklukns”k fnukad 01- 08-2006 }kjk bl lEcU/k es Li’Vhdj.k Hkh izdkf”kr fd;k x;k fd iwoZ izdkf”kr “kklukns”k fnukad 19-03-2005 ds izkfo/kku bl o’kZ ykxw ugh gS ,ao vf/kdre vk;q lhek 40 o’kZ gh gSA vf/kd vk;q ds vH;fFk;ksa }kjk ;ksftr ;kfpdkvksa esa ek0 U;k;ky; }kjk ;kfpdk la0 241@,l0,l0@2006 jkds”k dqekj flga cuke jkT; o vU; lfgr 61 ;kfpdkvksa esa fnukad 05-07-2007 dks vfUre fu.kZ; ikfjr djrs gq, 40 o’kZ ls vf/kd vk;q ds vH;FkhZ dh fcf”k’V ch0 Vh0 lh0 esa izos”k dh ekax dks fujLr djrs gq, ;kfpdkvksa dks [kkfjt dj fn;k x;kA mDr fcUnqvksa ds vk/kkj ij Li’V gS fd ;kphx.k o’kZ 2006 dh fof”k’V ch0 Vh0 lh0 p;u izfd;k gsrw vgZ ugh gS] D;ksfd mudh vk;q 40 o’kZ ls vf/kd gks pqdh gSA ek0 mPp U;k;ky; ds mDr vkns”k fnukad 5-07-2007 ds fo:} Lis”ky vihy la0 82@2007 Jherh fefFkys”k o vU; cuke mRrjk[k.M jkT; o vU; ek0 mPp U;k;ky; esa fnukad 25-07-2007 dks izLrqr gqbZA ek0 mPp U;k;ky; }kjk mDr Lis”ky vihy Hkh [kkfjt dj nh x;hA mDr fcUnqvksa ds vk/kkj ij Li’V gS fd ;kphx.k fcf”k’V ch0 Vh0 lh0 2006 p;u izfd;k gsrw fu/kkZfjr vgZrk iw.kZ ugh djrs ,ao jkT; Lrj ij vUrZtuinh; dkmfUlfyax dh O;oLFkk Hkh ugh gSA vr% mudk p;u fd;k tkuk fu;ekuqdwy ,ao U;k; laxr ugh gSA** (4) In view of the reasons mentioned in the impugned order, there appears no illegality in the order. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dated.01.10.2007. NS