WRH' PETITION (S) No. 103$ of 2009 I PETITEONER : Dinesh Kumar Kash p aged about 23 years s/o Shri Kanhaiya L I Kashyap Shiksha Karmi 3 B.Sc. (Biology) R/ viliage Semariya Tahsi! Champa Distt. Janjgir Champa (€.G.) RESPON DE NTS H IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisg rh, Through: Principa! Secretary, Panchayat & Viliage Deveiopment, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, aE. Raad, Ré‘ipur (c.a.) 2.‘ Director, Panchaya§ and Samaj Sewa Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Executwe Officer Janpad Panchayat Basna Dlsti' Mahasamund(CG) PETiTlON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTlTUTlON OF INDIA SB H01 eShn Satish K Agmhotn 1! Present: Shri V.G.Tamaskar, Advocate far the petitmner. Ms. smita Ghai Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents 18¢ 2. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 02M day of March 2009) With the consent of the parties, the matter Is heard finally. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been removed from service without following the principies of natural justice vide order dated 21.08.2008 (Annexure V P/7). Shri Tamaskar as wen as Smt. Ghai, learned counsei appearing for , the parties jointly submit that this case is squarely couered by the decision in the matter of Ku. Punam and others v. State of‘ Chhattlsgarh Othersi. Smt. Ghai further submits that she has ne objection if the matter is decided in light of the above case i.e. Ku. _ Punam (supra). in View of the above, the petition is allowed in the same terms i.e. . the impugned order dated 21.08.2008 (Annexure P/7) is quashed. However, the respondent-State is at liberty to take appropriate steps in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. NO order asto costs. . Consequently, LA. No. 1 and 2, aiso stand disposed J 12008 (2’) CGLJ 356 : of ’ p