THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1116 of 2009 Date:26.04.2011 Between: Cheboina Nagamunendrarao ..... Petitioner AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Secretary, Hyderabad and others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri T.V.V.Koteswararao Counsel for Respondents: Government Pleader for Land Acquisition The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in dispossessing the petitioner from the lands admeasuring Ac.0.76 cents in R.S.No.294/1A2 part and Acs.1.54 cents in R.S.No.294/1B part of Kottada Village, Kaikaluru Mandal, Krishna District as illegal and arbitrary. I have hard Sri T.V.V.Koteswararao, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition. At the hearing, the learned Government Pleader stated that in pursuance of the notice issued by the Land Acquisition Officer for enquiry under Section 5-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the Act’), the petitioner has submitted his objections and without waiting for disposal of those objections, he has filed the present writ petition. The learned Government Pleader has drawn my attention to the averments contained in para 3 of the counter-affidavit filed by the Land Acquisition Officer, wherein it is inter alia stated that the petitioner has attended the enquiry on 24.02.2009 and filed his objections duly availing the opportunity of being heard and that the report of enquiry was submitted to respondent No.2 and no decision has yet been taken by the latter. The petitioner has not filed any reply-affidavit controverting to the above averments. At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the above stand taken by the respondents. Inasmuch as the objections raised by the petitioner are yet to be disposed of, I do not find any reason whatsoever for the petitioner to rush to this Court by way of this writ petition. Therefore, this Court has no option other than treating this writ petition as wholly unwarranted and premature. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy in the event of rejection of his objections. . As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, interim order dated 28.01.2009 in W.P.M.P.No.1403 of 2009 is vacated and W.P.M.P.No.1403 of 2009 and W.V.M.P.No.4190 of 2009 are dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 26th April, 2011 GHN