x IN THE HIGH COURT: QF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR ’ " - CV, WinNo. .L2Z5l4 {2003. PETITIONERS: MAYA DEVI MEHANI WIO DILIP KUMAR MEHANI AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS RIO SINDHI COLONY, SETH! NAGAR RAIGARH.[CHHATTISGARH] VERSUS 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THRO UGH SE CRETARY COOMMERCE & INDUSTRIES D 'S BHAWAN ‘ IPUR.[CHHATTISGARH] A 2. COLLECTOR RAIGARH.[CHHATTISGARH} RF$¥0NDENTS: .\ \ 3V GENERAL MANAGER DISTRTCT TRADE & INDUSTRIALCENTRE RAIGARH. [CHHATTTSGARH] 4. ANIL GOYAL PROP. ASIAN CABLE COMPANY 2, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE RAICARHJCHHATTISGARH] WIT P ON UNDER ARTICLE 2&2”%F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR IS ANCE OF A WRIT IN THENATU'RE OF MANDAMUS, PROIDBITION, ‘CER RARI ETC DR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO IUSTICE IN TTISGARII R E I Emmi—arm x» pk) agu / 1003 WW Wt 200 mm<m> WWW WW f§ém $aifansné¥r 3-7-2003 x Shri Sunil Otwani, Advoce .te for the petitioner. ' Shri Gautam Bhaduri, Dy Héard. The present petition is not order but the cohtention is allotment of land has been rejec notice for demand Ofjustice has Having considered and wi1 same in accordance with law within three months from representation. If any adverse C.c. as per rules. Adv. General for the State. preferred against any particular that an application regarding ted illegally. It is submitted that not been made. bout expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in the justice will be make a d along with a copy 01‘ the petition within a month from today, and on such representation being filed, the Collector shall decide th as early as possible preferably the date of production of order is passed, the petitioners niay challenge the same in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, this petition stands disposed of. LA. No. 3708/2003 for urgent hearing stands flisppsedof. Sdl- / Fakhruddin Judge ‘1 FS/350 12/2000 50,000. opinion of this Court, ends of d if a direction is given to the petitioners to representation before the CollectOr Raigarh Gr DRJ s e e i w l e