IN THE Hlg LOURT OF 3UDICATI% A'ImHEiglt’aggag‘L? wg/ FIRST APPEAL O. /2004 (’TIKARAM, SON OFJAGGU, ADULT, RESIDENT OF GRAM SANKARA, P.H.1NO.98, DHARSIVA, DISTRICT RAIPUR. / /1'. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH THE’ LAND V. ACQUISITION OFFICER, RAIPUR. 2 THE GENERAL MANAGER JILA / UDYOG KENORA, RAIPHR’. RESPONDENTS ‘ Appeal valued at as per amount of compensation claimed is more than Rs.1Lac and a fixed court fee Rs.20/— APPEAL UNDER SECTION 54 OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 ~ax ! 2—11-2004 Shri Ajif Singh, Advoca'i'e for The appeHam-(s). Shri Pmshan‘r Mishr-a, Iddifioml Advoca‘l'e Generai for fhe Sfafe. Heard. The case is Iisfed for orders on default Learned counsel for fhe oppellanf(s) prays for #ime +0 remove The default As prayed, fwo weeks‘; fime is granfed f0 remove fhe default If 1'he defaul‘l is nofr jmoved wifhin Thersfipulafed ‘rime, the appeal shall be dismis au‘l'oma‘rically wi‘l'houf fur‘l’her referepce fo fhe Bench. l g «\L ~ l [113%W XLHC-22 /‘\ @ ’ 1 m m mm 200 m max j mm WW wm mmm $at‘mm‘ WW I ; D3,: Hon Hon:ble.$hr; ble Shn Fakhmdd‘ § L C Bhaczoa,nj'J. i \ Sdl- Sdl- L.c.BHADoo Judge Jqdge Barve. a E'A’. mi .E 1‘W25'04E g ‘ Wm 11120 m 115m mmmm WankW I?W than $ aim WW 02/07/2013 This case is treated as dismissed in View of peremptory court‘s order dated 02.11.2004 details note-sheet V . (for part may kindiy be seen). Counsei be informed be accordingiy. Sd/—‘ AR(J)} so. ipivii) ax» 9-