BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16786 of 2011 MAHABOOB BEEVI @ MADHAR BEEVI, ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.4 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIM BRANCH, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT VIRUDHUNAGAR. CRIME NO.42/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.PALANIVELAYUTHAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.R.RAMACHANDRAN, Additional Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 120(b), 419, 423, 465, 466, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC in Crime No.42 of 2011 and seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been arrayed as A4 and she has been falsely implicated in this case. It is submitted that the case of the defacto complainant is to the effect that A1 is said to have created a bogus Power of Attorney document in favour of A2 and A2 sold the property to A3. In turn, A3 settled the property to his daughter, A4. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case on the allegation levelled against the other accused and the petitioner/A4 has been implicated on the allegation of A3 settling the property in favour of A4. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on allegation that the co-accused had settled the property in favour of the petitioner/A4 and the investigation is pending. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that the entire allegations are borne out by records and documents, this Court is of the considered view that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required, this Court is constrained to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of her arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Virudhunagar on her executing a bond for a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five Thousand only) with one surety for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall be available for interrogation as and when required. Sd/- 20/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II VIRUDHUNAGAR 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIM BRANCH, VIRUDHUNAGAR DT, VIRUDHUNAGAR. 3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. S.PALANIVELAYUTHAM Advocate SR.No.44893 ssk/21.12.2011 /5c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16786 of 2011 Date :20/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/