: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.220 OF 2009 Urmila Laxman Patkar & Anr. .. Applicants V/s. Dayaram Gulzarilal Deval & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. Santosh B. Norwade i/b. M/s. M.P. Vashi & Associates for the Applicants. Mr. Havnur for Respondent No.1. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 26 TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C.: 1. The learned Advocate for the applicants states, on instructions from the applicant No.2 who is present in Court, that the applicants do not want to press this Civil Revision Application, however, he submits that they be given liberty to continue to reside in the suit premises for a period of one year. 2. Mr. Havnur appearing for respondent No.1- landlord submits that this request is not acceptable to respondent No.1-landlord and, : 2 : according to him, the only indulgence which could be shown to the applicants is that they can continue in the suit premises till the end of the current academic year. 3. The Civil Revision Application is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. 4. However, the decree shall not be executed till 31st May, 2010 on the usual undertaking being given by the applicants and all adult persons in the family, who reside in the suit premises, within a period of two weeks from today. .......