1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twelfth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.11501 of 2011 1 VIJAYARAM 2 “KUTHIRAI MARK” SENTHIL ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos.1 &2 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE BATLAGUNDU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, CRIME NO.380/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. D.SENTHIL Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Addl.Public Prosecutor( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 341, 323,427,506(i) and 379(NP)I.P.C. in Crime No.380 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners arrayed as A1 and A2 and the alleged occurrence took place on 31.07.2011 and a false case has been registered against them under Sections 341, 323,427,506(i) and 379(NP)I.P.C. and hence, they prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submits that the petitioners herein have assaulted the de-facto complainant and trespassed into a chicken shop and caused damage the Egg and other articles worth about Rs.15,000/- and taken away the cash of Rs.3,000/- and the investigation is going on and hence he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, the alleged occurrence took place on 31.07.2011 in the chicken shop of the de-facto complainant and they caused damage. Even though the case has been registered on 31.07.2011 and even though they were not arrested and they https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 neither interfered with the investigation nor absconding from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners on condition that the petitioners together shall deposit a sum of Rs.18,000/-(Rupees Eighteen Thousand only) to the credit of Crime No.380 of 2011 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Nilakkottai, and on receipt of the same, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakkottai and each of them shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 12/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKKOTTAI. 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BATLAGUNDU POLICE STATION,DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/S. D.SENTHIL Advocate SR.No.30828 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11501 of 2011 Date :12/09/2011 PA/13.09.2011/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/