IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM THURSDAY, THE 3RD NOVEMBER 2011 / 12TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 28453 of 2011(F) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- ANU T.CHERIYAN, S/O.CHERIYAN THOMAS, AGED 35 YEARS, ETTUTHARAYIL AROMA, PERUNGALA MURI, KAYAMKULAM, KARTHIKAPPALLI TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.ARUNKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-690 502. 2. SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAYAMKULAM POLICE STATION, KAYAMKULAM, ALAPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-690 502. 3. SHIJI @ SHAJI, THARAYIL VEEDU, ERUVA PO, KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA, PIN-690 572. 4. LATHEEF KUNJU, CHEMATHARAYIL, THODIYOOR, KARUNAGAPPALLI, KOLLAM, PIN-690 523. 5. H.MUHAMMAD KUNJU,ILLIKKULATH VADAKKATHIL CHERAVALLI, KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA, PIN-690 572. 6. IBRAHIM KUTTY, ALANKAR HOUSE, KEERIKKAD THEKKU, KEERIKKAD VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA, PIN-690 508. R1 & R2 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. M.K.ABOOBACKER R3 TO R6 BY ADVS. SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE(PERUMPALLIKUTTIYIL) SRI.A.R.DILEEP, SMT.NAVA VARGHESE, SRI.MANU SEBASTIAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.28453/2011 F APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: R4(A): COPY OF AGREEMENT OF SALE. R4(B): COPY OF 13(2) NOTICE DTD. 19/05/2011 PUBLISHED IN MATHRUBHOOMI DAILY. R4(C): COPY OF NOTICE DTD. 27/09/2011. /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JJ. ------------------------------- WP(C).NO. 28453 of 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose ,J. Petitioner has approached this court seeking police protection for his life and limbs. Party respondents have filed detailed counter affidavit wherein it is contended that substantial amounts are owed by the petitioner to them. It is to evade the above liability that the petitioner has approached this court without any bonafides seeking police protection. Granting police protection in this writ petition it is likely to cause prejudice to the interest of the respondents in the action which the respondents may initiate for recovery of the amounts due. 2. Having considered the rival submissions addressed at the bar, we are not convinced that there is warrant for issuance of specific relief sought for. But since it is clear that the relationship between the petitioner and the party respondents is strained we direct the 2nd respondent to keep vigil and to ensure that the dispute between the petitioner and the party WP(C).28453/2011 2 respondents do not give rise to any law and order situation. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,JUDGE pmn/ C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE