^iiN^.,;}^'- HIGH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH AT BILASFUR Writ Petition (S) No. 1455 of2009 PETITIONER : Akliiteshwar Giri, S/o Late Shd Shivlal Giri, aged aJbout 35 years, Assistant Teacher, Gx)vernmei?t Primary School, Karhi Bazar, Development Block Bhatapara, District Raipur (CG). VERSUS' RESPONDENTS : 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secreta^, Department | of Education^ DKS Bhawan, Raipur 2. District. Edpcation Officer, Raipur, Distt. Raipur 3. Block Education OfficCT Development Block Bhatapara, District Raipur (CG). (WRIT PETIT10N UNDER ARTtCLE 226 OF THE CONSTFTUTION OF INDIA) fSB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Asniliotlri, J.) Present : ShriA.K. Prasad.Advocatefbrthepetitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, DeputyOovt. Advocatefor the State. ORALORDER ^: -,.' • • 1.-- (Passed on 19th day ofMarch, 2009) 1. With the consent of leamed counsel appearing fbr the parties, the matter is heard finally. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that fhe petitioner is esititled to grant oftwo increments as he has obtaitied D.Ed. certificate on his own expenses during the service period. Leamed counsel further submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a.representation to the aufhorities for grant offrwo mcrements pursuant to the judgnient and order passed by this Court in fhe matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj v. Municipal Corporation, Durg cmd another^ ond W.P.(S.) No. 4130 of 20Q5,Gopesh Kumar Verma vs. The State Govt. of 1 Chhattisgarh andanather. ; 2006(H) MPJR-CG 96 '^, Gowri The State Goveinment is under an obligation to follow the law settled by fhis Court aiid it is not necessary to approach this Court by each and every employee when the law has already been settled by this Court. The employees, who are similariy situated and have not approached the Court, may be treated at par with otlier employees, who have approached tliis Court. It is not necessasy to approach this Court for similar order. In view of the tbregoing reasons, this petition staiids disposed of with liberty reser^ed to tiie petitioner, on the request of leamed counsel, to make a representation. Ifthe representation is filed by the petitioner, the same may be considered and decided, in accordance with law on its own merit as expeditiously as possible.preferably within a period of eight weeks fromthe date ofreceipt ofthe representation. Consequently, pending applications, ifany, stand disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge