1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 52. CA/9002/2009 In FAST/17184/2009 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. V.P.Latange, Adv., h/f Mr. B.S.Kudale, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. D.V.Tele, AGP, for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:12-3-2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard learned Counsel for the original claimant. A request to condone delay of 2262 days in filing the First Appeal is made. 2. LAR No.98/1992, came to be decided by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Hingoli, dt.5.3.2003. The LAR was partly allowed. The owner is not satisfied with the award and wanted to challenge the same. However, in the process, there is exorbitant delay. During the course of submission, the learned 2 Counsel for the appellant/claimant submits, the appellant/claimant will not claim equities and benefit for intervening period consumed in filing the present appeal, the delay being of 2262 days. 3. Accepting the above position, the delay, though is exorbitant, however, it is sufficiently explained and, added to it is the statement from the learned Counsel for the claimant, not to take benefit of the interest for the intervening period. In the above scenario, the delay is condoned. Civil Application is allowed. Learned A.G.P. will intimate the officer concerned about the waiver indicated for the benefits for 2262 days. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/9002-09ca