1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR First Appeal No. 537/2005 (Vasantrao Bisansa Jungade Vs. Suresh Deokaran Shaha & ors.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. N.B. Jawade h/f Mr. S.V. Sirpurkar, Advocate, for appellant. Mr. R.R. Deshpande & Mrs. P.M. Chandekar, Advocate for R- 3 to 10. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : AUGUST 27 , 2009 . Heard Shri Jawade holding for Shri S.V. Sirpurkar, the learned counsel for the appellant, and Shri R.R. Deshpande with Mrs. P.M. Chandekar for the respondents. Parties have filed an application for passing a decree in terms of the compromise between the parties. The terms of the compromise are mentioned in Clauses (A) to (N) of the application. The application is signed by the counsel for the appellant and the counsel for the respondents. The same is also signed by the appellant and by all the respondents. The contesting parties i.e. the appellant and the respondent nos. 1 and 2 are present in the Court today. When the Court inquired from the parties as to whether they are ad idem over the terms of the compromise, they have answered in the affirmative. I have perused the terms of the compromise. They appeared to be fair and reasonable. 2 Hence, the first appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise between the parties. A decree may be drawn accordingly. No order as to costs. JUDGE RMP