cro L IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT WRIT PETITION (S) NO? ^01^ OF 2009 (S.B.) PETITIONERS •^' <-? <?'" ..«5 ^4^ ^::~'/'\7' :-w .c?-'/ ^ ^ RESPONDENTS ^ ^ l^--"Smt. Somari Kashyap W/o Shri Devichand Kashyap, aged about 35 years, Occupation - Teacher, Presently posted as L.D.T. at Kanya Ashram Chhindgarh, Tahsil Konta, District - Dantewada (C.G.) R/o Santoshi Ward Jagdalpur District Bastar (C.G.). 2. Smt. Aayate Nag w/o Shri Budhraru Nag, aged about 34 years, Occupation - Teacher, F'resently Posted as L.D.T. at Kanya Ashram Bhusaras, Tahsil Dantewada District Dantewada (C.G.) R/o Aurabhatha, Dantewada (C.G.). 3,,.. Smt. Sukhmati Kachh w/o Shri Lalit Kumar Kachh, aged about 35 years, occupation - Teacher, Presently posed as L.D.T. at Kanya Ashram Mokhpal, Tahsil- Dantewada, District Dantewada (C.G.) R/o viUage - Badearapur, Post Tokapal, District Bastar (C.G.). VERSUS 1, State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Commissioner, Tribal Welfare 3. and Development, Raipur (C.G.). Collector, Dantewada (C.G.). District District Collectorate, Dantewada 4. . The Secretary, Mata Rukhmani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tahsil & District Jagdalpur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1950 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTJSGARHAT BILASPUR WRTT PETmON CS) No. 5402 of2009 PETmONE.RS RESPONDENTS Smt. Somari Kashyap & Others. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRrr pETmoN UNDER ARTICLE 225 OP THE CONSTITLmON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Amiya Kant Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioners. smt. Smita Ghai, Panei Lawyer forthe State/respondents 1 to 3. . Amit (Passed on 25U day of September, 2009) Hsard leamed counsel for fhe parties. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the mstant petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Smt. A.Lall v. State ofChhattisgarh & Others , thus the petitionei-s may be permitted to make arepresentation to decidetheir case in tlie light ofaforestated decision, subject to verification asto wiiether the respondent No. 4-Institute is a Govemmsnt Aided school and the petitioners are teacher within the sanctioned strength. 2. Leamed counsel appearmg for the State/Tespondents 1 to 3 subniits that m the event, tfae petitioners make a representation, the same wi!l be considered aiid decided, in accordance with law, v/ithin a period offour weeks fi-om the date of receiot ofthe representation. 3. In view of foregoing, according to the leanied eounsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. i Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 2007 (l)BLJ 265.