THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No. 5989 of 2006. ORDER: When this writ petition, which is listed under the caption ‘for admission’, is called there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This writ petition has a checkered career. On 24.3.2006, it was directed to be posted on 3.4.2006 to enable the learned Counsel for the petitioner to get instructions; meanwhile the respondents were directed not to dispossess the petitioner. On 3.4.2006 since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner either in the pre-lunch and post-lunch sessions, the writ petition was directed to be posted on 4.4.2006 for dismissal. On 4.4.2006, as there was no representation for the petitioner, the writ petition was dismissed. Later, W.P.M.P.No. 9722 of 2006 was filed to recall the order of default. As there was no representation in W.P.M.P.No. 9722 of 2006 on 29.12.2006, the application was adjourned and subsequently on 13.10.2009, the application W.P.M.P.No. 9722 of 2006 was ordered and again the writ petition was directed to be listed for admission on 7.12.2010. On 7.12.2010 again as there was no representation for the petitioner, the matter was adjourned. Today the writ petition is listed under the caption of admission and though the name of Sri.D.Harikrishna, who filed vakalath for the petitioner, is reflected in the cause title, there is no representation for the petitioner even today also. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 3.2.2011. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No. 5989 of 2006. ORDER: DT. 3.2.2011.