1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 246/2008 (Dhanraj Sadashiv Dhamel & anr. Vs. The U.O.I. & ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. Mr. M.M. Agnihotri, Adv. for the petitioners. Mr. R.G. Agrawal, Adv. for R- 1 to 5. Mr. A.K. Choube, Adv. for R-6. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : MARCH 11, 2008. The grievance of the petitioner is in respect of location of Fast Food Centre on the platform in question. Mr. Agrawal, the learned counsel for the Railways, has submitted that the location of the Fast Food Centre does not create obstruction to the smooth flow of passengers on the platform. The learned counsel further submitted that a care would be taken to see that the passengers are not put to inconvenience because of the location of the Fast Food Centre. 2 In that view of the matter, no further indulgence is necessary in the present writ petition. Petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE RMP