s- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPyR W.P.(Sinto4450of2007 P6TITIONER RESPONDENTS Shrikant Pandey S/o. Lat® Shri Balkrishna Pandey, Aged about — 35 years, R/o. - Vtllage Bhadesar, Tahsil & Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Versus 1. Chaim'ian, Coal Indfa Ltd. 10, Nelaji Subhash Road, Koltata (W.B.) 2. Director (P. & IR.), Coal Indla LU., 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolfcata (W.B.) 3. Member Secretary, JBCC-VI (Joint Bipartite Committee for The Coal Industry), Coal India Ltd. 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkata (W.B.) 4. Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, S.E.C.L. Head Qtr. Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Chief General Manager, Korba Area, Distt.-Korba (C.G.) WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2260? THE CONSTn'UTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri Rahul Mishra, counsel for the petiUoner. Shri Praveen Das, counsel forthe respondents. ORAL ORDER (02.08.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the peUtioner is similarly situated to thatof the respondents in the matter of Chaimian, Central Coaffitefcfe Lhi. & others Vs. Jwendta Prasad Tiwari & ofhers (Ch/il Appeal No. 1714 of 2007). Learned counsel further submits that the said Civil Appeal'tias been disposed of vMe order dated 2^h Mareh, 2007, passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. Leamed counsel further submits ttiat this case may also be dispo»dof in Uie same terms, which the learned counsel appearing for the respondents/S.E.C.L. does not controvert. In view of the above, the petition stands djsposed of in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sisnil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti