IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10376 of 2008 MADAN MAHTO & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 07.05.2008 The petitioners apprehend their arrest in complaint case no. 761 of 2006 under Section 498(A) of the I.P.C. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no. 1 Madan Mahto is Bhaisur, petitioner no. 2 Yogendra Mahto is cousin Sasur and petitioner no. 3 Mohan Mahto is cousin Sasur who is not actually related but due to village relation he is said to be the cousin father-in-law of the complainant. It is submitted that the main allegation is that torture and harassment is on husband. So far these petitioners are concerned, there is general and omnibus allegation against them. Learned APP does not point out any other material. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, the petitioners, namely, Madan Mahto, Yogendra Mahto, Mohan Mahto are admitted to anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Complaint Case No. 761 of 2006 subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Kundan (C.M. Prasad, J.) - 2 -