1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.6368/2010 Nanu Ram Vs. State Date of order : 20/7/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri S.K. Jain for the petitioner. Shri Amit Punia, P.P. for the State. ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that allegation against the petitioner is of committing offence u/s.379 of IPC. Recovery of stolen motor cycle has already been filed. Charge sheet has been filed. Petitioner is in jail for last two months. Two more cases are pending against him and therefore he has been falsely implicated as accused in the present case. He would undertake not to indulge in any offence in future. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail. In the result, this bail application 2 u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Nanu Ram S/o Jagannath Prasad shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No.230/2010, P.S. Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur for offence u/s.379 of IPC on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. However, in case the petitioner is found indulged in any offence at any point of time, the bail granted to him in this case as well as in other cases shall be liable to be cancelled on this ground alone, at the instance of prosecution. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/