1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.715/2005 Sanjay Kumar Singh. vs. Addl. District Judge No.3, Udaipur and others. Date : 13.3.2008 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.M Shishodia, for the petitioner. Mr.JP Bhardwaj, for the respondents. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the parties. This matter is listed in the Court on the application filed by the respondents dismissing the writ petition and vacating the stay order on the ground that the petitioner sought stay against the trial of the suit in civil original suit no.111/2004 (345/2004) on the ground that in case, the petitioner will have to file written statement in the civil original suit, then he will have to disclose his defence which may prejudice his criminal case. According to learned counsel for the respondents, not only the trial in the criminal case has been completed but the petitioner has 2 also been convicted by the trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the trial has been completed and the petitioner has been convicted but an appeal has been preferred by the petitioner. Since the very cause for which the stay was sought has come to an end which is conclusion of the trial of the criminal case, I do not find any reason to continue the stay as well as the writ petition also has become infructuous. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous and the stay order dated 4.2.2005 is vacated. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya