IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2151 OF 1994 with WRIT PETITION NO. 7512 OF 2005. Sangli District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd...... ......... Petitioner V/s Dattatray S. Yadav..... ..... Respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Office Notes, Office ) Court's or Judge's Orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances ) Court's orders or directions and ) Registrar's orders. ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Mr.Prashant Naik, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr.S.G.Page with Mr.K.S.Bapat, Adv. For respondent No.1. CORAM: A.P. DESHPANDE, J. 22.3.2007 PC: The parties to these petitions have placed on record consent terms which goes to resolve the dispute. A joint prayer is made by learned counsel for the parties to dispose of writ petitions in terms of said consent terms. Parties are present in the Court and they admit the consent terms to be true and correct. In this view of the matter writ petitions are disposed of in terms of consent terms which are taken on record and marked `X' for identification. In terms of clause (l) of the consent terms I direct the Registrar General, High Court, Bombay to permit the petitioner- bank to withdraw the amount as set out in clause (a) of the said consent terms. 22.3.07.