IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-12-2010 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN W.P.No.26849 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 Mrs.Janaki Ammal ... Petitioner Versus 1.The District Collector, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur. 2.The Block Develoment Officer, Thiruvallur Union, Ekkadu, Thiruvallur Taluk, Thiruvallur District 3.M.Subramani ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 and 2 from permitting the 3rd Respondent in constructing a house under KVT (Kalignar Veetu Vasathi Thittam) Scheme, in Survey No.175/5,175/4 and 175/1B Puliyur Kandigai,Puliyur Village, Thiruvallur Taluk and District. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Murthy For Respondents 1 and 2: Mr.S.Gopinathan Additional Government Pleader O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2. 2. Though the prayer sought for by the petitioner, in the present writ petition, is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 19.11.2010, is directed to be disposed of by the second respondent, on merits and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ in accordance with law, within a specified period. 3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 19.11.2010, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the other persons concerned, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The petitioner is directed to furnish to the second respondent a copy of the representation, dated 19.11.2010, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition stands closed. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar arr To 1.The District Collector, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur. 2.The Block Develoment Officer, Thiruvallur Union, Ekkadu, Thiruvallur Taluk, Thiruvallur District +1cc to Govt. Pleader Sr 87728 +1cc to Mr.D.Murthy, Advocate Sr 87307 BK(CO) km/21.12. W.P.No.26849 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/