IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46662 of 2007 1. AMIT KUMAR SINGH @ GANGU SON OF SUMESHWAR PRASAD SINGH. 2. ARBIND KUMAR @ ARBIND SINGH SON OF SUMESHWAR PRASAD SINGH 3. AKHILESH SINGH SON OF LATE CHANDRAKET SINGH ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DUMARI, POLICE STATION TARAIYA, DISTRICT SARAN Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. BAIJNATH SINGH S/O LATE RAMCHANDRA SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DUMARI, P.S. TARAIYA, DISTRICT SARAN. ----------- 4. 11.3.2010. Despite repeated calls, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners. However, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 is present. In this case, by order dated 1.2.2008, further proceeding in Trial No.3467 of 2007 arising out of Taraiya P.S. Case No.70 of 2006 was ordered to remain stayed. The petitioners have prayed for quashing of the order dated 31.1.2007 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chapra in Sessions Trial No.3467 of 2007 arising out Taraiya P.S. Case No.70 of 2006 and also for quashing of the order dated 10.9.2007 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Saran in Cr.Revision No.98 of 2007 whereby it has been held that, prima facie, case against the petitioners under Sections 341, 323, 504 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code is made out. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 opposes the petition. He submits that there is no infirmity in the impugned order. I am in agreement with the submission of the learned counsel for opposite party no.2. 2 I have examined the impugned order. I am of the view that there is no infirmity in the impugned order. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petition and the petition stands rejected. Since the petition has been rejected, order of stay granted on 1.2.2008 automatically stands vacated. Let this order be communicated to the concerned court forthwith. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)