IN THE HIGH COUBT OF CHHATTISG^RH AT BILASPUR . .P. N0^<2<^^7 OF 2001. PEJJ.JigNE&S -^ .-< -..'"'l''.^' ^:.<^^ ,^^' .^^ "..-•"" '!-<!~y.-••""' ^^•- V E R S U S ^ RESPOMDfcNJS 4. Badri Prasad Uraon, S/o Dhannu Ram Uraon, aged about 55 years. Smt. Kunti Bai, D/o Badri Prgsad Uraon, aged about 15 years, Through : The Natural Guard- ian the father Badri Prased Uraony Both resident of Village- Kenda, out post Bjelgahna/ Police Station Belgahna, Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur, (C.G.). 'State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Home Department, D»K.S» Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.). District Magistrate, District Bilaspur, (C.G.). Superlntendent of Police, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, (C. G. ). Shri G.P. Yadav, (A.S.I.), Posted at out post Police Station B^lgahna, Distr>c^b Bilaspur, (C.G.). ^•-y^ &l1vRIT PET1TIQN UNDER <ARTICLE 226/227_OF_JliE__CgNSTITUHON OF_lNDJA_rc^_ISSUE,,gF ^__,AP OPRIATE_^F^I^^ IN_ THE_NA'RBE OF MAND^iUS/CERTIOhARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDBi IN THE LJ.KE NAnjRE ETC. v contd.,.2 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR WRTT PETmQN No. 2567 of2001 PETITIONER : Badri Prasad Uraon & another. VER8U8 RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotri, J. Present: Sbri Rajesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri N.N.Roy, Panel La^vyer forthe State/respondents 1 to 3. ORDERCORAL) (Passed on 27th day of July, 2010) 1. The case ofthe petitioner is that, despite lodging a written complamt, the respondents-police authorities are not taking any actioh against the alleged accused persons and are further not making any ^iquiry in the matter. Leamed counsel appearing fbr the petitioner submits that the facts of the instant case is squarely covered by a decision of Suprcme Court in Sakiri Vasu v. State ofU.P.& others^. Thus, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition witfa liberty to file appropriate complaint under the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short sthe Cr.P.C.') before the Magistrate. 2. Leamed counsel appearing fbr other side has no objection. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ainit 1 (2008) 2 SCC 409