Crl. Rev. No. 2847 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Rev. No. 2847 of 2010 Date of Decision: November 15, 2010 Hardial Singh and others …..Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and another …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioners. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Quashing of charges framed against the petitioners under Section 302 IPC vide order dated July 26, 2010 has been prayed for, inter- alia on the ground that on the same allegations FIR registered was found to be false, as such untraced report annexure P-2 was submitted. The complainant has taken a contradictory stand in the private compliant filed by him. Crl. Rev. No. 2847 of 2010 [2] In view of the new and contradictory version adopted in the private complaint, the continuation of proceedings in the complaint is abuse of the process of the Court. I have heard counsel for the petitioners. No doubt, the FIR was registered on the basis of the statement made to the complainant by the deceased Ajit Singh, that Hardial Singh, Jassa Singh and other 2/3 persons inflicted injuries on his person. Admittedly cancellation report has been field. The private complaint contains allegations contrary to the averments in the FIR. All these contradictions may constitute a good ground to seek acquittal but at this stage, it will not be appropriate to appreciate the said contradictors and quash the private complaint. Disposed of as premature at this stage with liberty to the petitioners to raise all the pleas at an opportune time. November 15, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE