IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 366 OF 2006. APPLICATION NO. 366 OF 2006. APPLICATION NO. 366 OF 2006. IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1058 OF 2006. WRIT PETITION NO. 1058 OF 2006. WRIT PETITION NO. 1058 OF 2006. AND AND AND CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 367 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 367 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 367 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1059 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.1059 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.1059 OF 2006 Peacock Industries Ltd. & others. ... Applicants. Versus. Lloyds Finance Ltd. and others. ... Respondents. Shri Niranjan Lohasiga i/by M/s.Niranjan & Co.for the Applicants. Shri Yogesh More for Respondent No.1. Ms.S.V.Gajare, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 25th September, 2006. : 25th September, 2006. : 25th September, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Not on Board. Taken on Board. 2. The Advocate for the 1st Respondent is granted time of two weeks to file vakalatnama. The learned A.P.P. waives service for 2nd Respondent. In view of the averments made in the Application, case for restoration is made out. Accordingly applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Judge. Judge. Judge.