IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22501 of 2008 RAMADHAR RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 02.07.2008 This has come under the heading ‘to be mentioned’ at the instance of the petitioner for modification of order no.2 dated 12.6.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner Ramadhar Rai was granted bail vide order dated 12.6.2008 on consideration of the plea that he is neither named in the FIR nor any TIP has been held nor there is any recovery from his possession. But learned counsel for the petitioner informs that because of some communication gap the submission made to the effect that petitioner was not put on TIP was not correct. There is single identification. He is not named in the FIR and he has remained in custody for more than eight months. Since petitioner is law abiding citizen he did not furnish any bail bond in terms of order dated 12.6.2008. In the facts and circumstances, the petitioner Ramadhar Rai is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rupees ten thousand with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in Barauni (Chakia) P.S.case no. 365 of 2007. Let this order be communicated through Fax at the cost of the petitioner. (Subash Chandra Jha,J.) spal/