WP(C) 4784/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE. BD AGARWAL Heard Mr. S. Banik, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. BC Choudhury, lea rned Govt. counsel appearing for the State respondents. Mr. Banik limited his argument only to direct the State responde nts to ascertain that Mora Sipia Fishery do not fish or set up collection/sellin g counters within the petitioner’s area of operation i.e., Brahmaputra Part-I an d Dibang River Fishery, Tinsukia District. In my considered opinion, the aforesa id grievance can be raised before the concerned Deputy Commissioner, Tinsukia (R espondent No.3) by way of filing representation. If any such representation is filed, the Deputy Commissioner shall make an enquiry and pass appropriate orders . It is needless to say that none of the lessee can be permitted t o encroach the area of operation of other lessee. Hence, the Deputy Commissione r shall take appropriate action in this regard. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands dispos ed of.