THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.288 OF 2002 ORDER: 1 The respondents 1 to 3herein filed M.C.No.3 of 2001 against the petitioner herein claiming maintenance. In the said M.C. they also filed Crl.M.P.No.1592 of 2001 for grant of interim maintenance. The trial court, having heard the learned counsel for the respondents, allowed the said petition and directed the husband i.e. petitioner herein to pay Rs.500/- per month to each of the respondents from the date of petition. The said order dated 12.01.2002 is challenged in this revision. 2 Heard. 3 In my considered view, the court below must have heard the said M.C. and decided the same by now and hence no orders need be passed in this revision for the reason that it is only an interim maintenance. Further, the said amount of Rs.500/- awarded towards maintenance cannot be said to be excessive. 4 In the light of the above, this court sees no merits in this revision and the same is accordingly dismissed. -------------- 08.07.2010 Kvsn