‘Peiitiana's 1 . Respanaeni's Wrii Pemian .‘G l ai- kmt DJ HiGi-i C$EJRT OF CE‘iA'‘E . $3AQLE "T EELA$P§R .12$9 3f 29$? Sanjay' K mar aath'w Son 3f Shri' Ram Ps'akash Pathak njay Patrak ac“ of Late Wu Raw Prakash Pathak {Bath resident of Near Deshbandhu Press, Magarpara, Bélaspur) Versus St ie of Shhattisgarh T ougi‘f’t. Cauector, Bilaspur The Board 0f Revenue, Gwaiier &.. i)! b). ihe e t ners have cheéienged t. e iegaiity and propriery er {he order dated 8.11.2001 passed by the Board of Revenue, MP, Gwatior in Revteion Case NO 4 -redr 2001, wrereby the ward uf Reven e has mashed .h ruer Fassed b" 'he re ‘enue autherrtaes on ground that n ganglia, tease was granted to gangs Bar and arte. death 0f Genge name of his s n Man Singh nae oeen mutated wnrc . nas been ocetted by the revenue authorities. Lease is aiso acquisition of right over the pronerty. With the aforesaid ob ervatlor‘ the writ petition stand disposed fno i order as to costs. H‘n u iv an; Ual Sd/- TP Sharmai Judge an 3. Man Singh Sen ef Kudar Singh Thakur, Resident cf Jecub Che! Bsiaspur, Chattisgar'n 4. The Naib—Teheiidar, Biiha, Déstréct: Biiaspur (Chhati§egerh}. {Writ Pet: : n nder rtieie 226 & 227 e? ihe Cene‘iiiu‘iien ef Eiwdia) i‘ie. e presen f r {be peddow a Mr.Vined :ekam, Pane: Lawyer ici' respondents Nex‘r to 4f8tate. MLLPDubey, counsel for respondent Ne.3. ($3: Hen‘bie Mr. 11?. §harma, Jr; (JREER (29-1 L201 1) B" {hrs wn: petitien under Articie 226 & 22? of rhe $ensiiiurien cf indie