^^3G^^.to>^ PCp&.t?^QSrtw==i?S^T; c^ IN THE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. i'^49/ 2011 PETITIONER: Kamal Kishor Shandilya S/o Late shri B.R. ShandUya, aged about 37 years, occupation- service, Manager, Depot, F.C.I. F.S.D. Rajim, Abhanpur, Disti^ct Raipur (CG). Versus RESPONDENTS: <^<;'<^-^/ ^^•^" *\ /.-^'cv-\*°.•'' ...•-"' ?A'ii-^ ^" i'"^'' s»-'^! ^^tfi-» v'lv ' ..<^:"^. "y"t 'il.fV •^.^S»v'•!C^Se 1. Union of India , through the Secretaiy, Ministry of Food & Consumer Affair, New Delhi. 2.' Chainnan cuin Managing Director , Food Corporation of India, Head Quarter 16-20 Barakhainbha Lane, New Delhi. 3. Executive Director, Food Corporation of India, Zonal Office , fWest) Dheeraj Amia, Building-IInd Floor, near Anant Kaneker, P.S. Bandra, Mumbai-400051. 4. General Manager (Region), Food Corporation of India, Vidhan Sabha Road, Regional Office, Raipur (CG). 5. Area Manager, Food Corporation of India, Madina Building, District Office, Raipur (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As stated in the cause title above. 'ETITIONER HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : B1LASPUR WR!TPETITiON-(S)NO. 1749 OF 2011 Kama! Kishor Shandiiva RESPONDENTS Versus Union of india & Others (Writ Pstition under Artlcle 226 of the Conststution of Indiai Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihot", J. Present:- Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Vivek ShrivasSava. Advocats for the rescondsnt No.1. Shri Prashant Jaiswal. Senior Advocate with Shri Aiav Mishra Advocate for the respondent No.2 to 5. ORDER (ORAL) ('Po.seoc! nnthic71°-fiawnfj.in.a 70111 !t is a" admitted posit'on that the petitioner is 50% physicaily disabted. Under Ciause 13 of the transfer DOJ'CV dated 21.11.2002. there is a provision to ^onsidsr the request of the physicaiiy disabled empioyes whiie transferrina the emDlovee. i" view of that. it is sxDedient that the rssoondent authorities should consiasr once again ine rsqusst OT !n° petitioner to piace at a convenient oiacs. mav be in adm'nistrative exiaencv. as earlv as possible, &refsrab!v within s Deriod of four weeks from the dats of fSCSI&t OT XHS f9DrSSSnt3t1QH< 1T 3HV, m3Cl©0V tH®'OQTitlOr''Sr, 1f the transfer order "as not been aiven effsct to, during pendsncy of / the writ petition, ths respondent authorities may consider not to imDisment the same. if a reDresentat'on is made bv the Detltioner witni" a penod ot one weeK. !n visw of foreaoina, the Detition stands disoosed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge