IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6788 of 2011 ARUN PASWAN SON OF LATE SAHDEO PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- HARLAWAR, P.S. LAXMIPUR, DISTRICT- JAMUI. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 25.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is in custody since 3.12.2010 in relation to Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 84 of 2010 instituted under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that for the first time petitioner was arrested on 8.6.2010 on about fortnight after the present case that would be evident from the seizure list Annexure-2. The only recovery was of a wrist watch from the petitioner. Instead of being remanded in this case, he was remanded in Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 90 of 2010 but he was acquitted in this case. He was rearrested in the present case. Even though Annexure-2, the seizure list clearly shows that seizure list was in relation to the present case. Neither the seized wrist watch has not been put on T.I. Parade nor there was any mention of wrist watch being stolen in the First Information Report. Be that as it may, the petitioner, above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No.84 of 2010. Devendra/ (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)