IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PETITIONER RESPONDENTS .f\%^f/ ^F <s\ ^.-'i' /BILASPUR / WRIT PETITION N0. 1-^9C OF 2005 VERSUS ^^' \^/ ^" 1t*- ^ta*" ^L'-'.i..-'•'. ~y '.''•-' .^!?7 _^yz ?^/' '^ /H.PETER, SON OF SHRI L.PETER, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, PRESENTLY POSTED AS TOWN INSPECTOR, MANENDRAGARH, DISTRICT KORIYA (C.G.) 1.STATE OF / CHHATTISGARH THROUGH THE SECRETARY OF HOME MINISTRY, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR. 2.THE DIRECTOR / GENERAL OF / POLICE, POLICE HEADQUARTERS, RAIPUR. 3-. THE "' SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT KORIYA. 4yDR. MAHMOOD / NAYYAR AZAM, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, SON OF LATE MD. ISHAQUE, RESIDENT OF WEST CHIRMIRI COLLIERY, PONDI, DISTRICT KORIYA. /5.ANANT RAM SAHU, A.S.I,PRESENTLY POSTED AT POLICE STATION CHAKRADHARNAGAR DISTRICT RAIGARH. WRFT ^ETITIO^N^JNDER ARTICLE 227 &. 226 OF THE^ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS / CERTIORARI ETC OR DIRECTION(S) ^ORDERtSl IJLTHE^IKE NATURE ETC. f30. vj-oq -qi«irt^,u-alwid, Rrtit-iy; HWvf>[fS*V^ W^2005- 3IT^9T q^cp (lyf^cj^) sn^STtRTR-fi* aaTT3II^?TSpqra Ssrma STOT4Rvf^V 3D^CT 13,07.2005 Dr. N.K. Shukla, Sr. Advodate with Mr. Shailendra Shukla, leamed counsel for the pe Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, le^irned Panel Lawyer for the State of Chhattisgarh / responcfents 1 to 4. In the present case filed ^nder Article 226 of ths Gonstitution ef India by the p^titioner, the petitioner impugnes the order dated 13.Cp.2005 (Annexure P-1) whereby the Superintendent of directed to register a case under Act, 1861 against the guilty delin^uent officers. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in| to how on the basis of the doci|ment (Annexure P-1), a case has been registered against| general letter wherein the Supej been directed to take action and delinquent officers. The petitioner presumes been guilty and a case is likely him. This petition is premature at| action has arisen to infringe any the petitioner. In viewofthe foregoing, th4 cpi<<Irt<Tlri *ii+ioT^f^€stRi'Ki^ ^'arf^Tan^?T tioner. 'olice, Korea has been Section 29 of the Police a position to explain as the petitioner. This is a intendent of Potice has egister case against the n advance that he has to be registered against this stage. No cause of legal / statutory right of petition is dismissed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnlhotri Judge {rr-^lr.^-