1 wp-6355-09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION W.P. NO. 6355 OF 2009 Shri.Rajmohan Sampat Sasne ..Petitioner Vs. Divisional Traffic Superintendent (D.F.LO.) M.S.R.T.C. Sangli Division ..Respondent .... Mr.Umesh Mankapure Adv. for Petitioner .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : AUGUST 6, 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned advocate for the petitioner. 2. In the year 1992, the petitioner was appointed as Conductor by the respondent-corporation. The petitioner received show cause notice dated 4th September, 2008. According to the petitioner, the show cause notice was based upon illegal domestic inquiry, hence, he filed complaint being (ULP) No.34 of 2008 before the Labour Court at Sangli on various grounds. The main prayer therein was to set aside the show cause notice. While the complaint was pending, the petitioner moved an application praying for status-quo in relation to the show cause notice till disposal of the complaint. This application for interim relief 2 wp-6355-09 was moved as the petitioner apprehended that he would be dismissed pursuant to the show cause notice. This application came to be rejected by the Labour Court by order dated 16th January, 2009. Being aggrieved by the order of the Labour Court, the petitioner filed revision application before the Industrial Court at Sangli being Revision Application No.2 of 2009. Therein, he moved an application for interim relief praying therein that the status-quo may be maintained in respect of the show cause notice and the corporation be restrained from acting upon the said show cause notice. The said revision application also came to be dismissed by order dated 23rd June, 2009. 3. It is seen that the main matter is pending before the Labour Court. If at all, any action is taken pursuant to the said show cause notice, the petitioner has remedy against the same and it would always be open to the petitioner to challenge the same. Hence, I am not inclined to entertain the present petition. In case, if any action is taken pursuant to said show cause notice and if the petitioner challenges the said action, all contentions in respect of fairness and legality of the inquiry, are left open. Writ petition is dismissed with above directions. [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]