IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 8778 of 2008. Decided on: 09.12.2010. _________________________________________________________ Ramesh Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. Respondent No.4 ex-parte. Rajiv Sharma, J.(Oral): Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No.4 to the post of Part-Time Water Carrier. The interview for the post in question was held on 5th July, 2002. The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he had donated land for construction of the school and was entitled to get 5 marks. His further case is that one member from the family of respondent No.4 is already in Government service. However, the petitioner has not placed any tangible evidence on record to establish that one member from the family of respondent No.4 is in Government service. Petitioner has secured 16 marks and respondent No.4 has secured 16.5 marks. Petitioner has also not placed on record 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - any document to establish that the land was donated for the purpose of school. Since the suitability of the petitioner and respondent No.4 has been adjudged by the duly constituted Committee, this Court will not sit in appeal over the same. 2. Consequently, in view of the observations made hereinabove, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 09, 2010. (sck).