1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6189 OF 2010 Manik S/o Shripat Patil .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri S. P. Brahme, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. K. Kadam, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM : P. V. HARDAS AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 10TH AUGUST, 2010. PER COURT : . This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by which the petitioner questions the correctness of the order of Aurangabad Bench of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, dated 26.04.2010 in Original Application No. 585 of 2009 allowing the original application and setting aside the appointment of the present petitioner on the post of Police Patil. 2. Undisputedly, an offence has been registered against the 2 petitioner vide Cr. No. 54/2005 for the offences punishable U/Sec. 306, 498(A) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. After the appointment order came to be issued, the petitioner came to be acquitted in the said crime by judgment delivered on 24.12.2008. The appointment of the petitioner on the post of police patil was questioned on twin grounds (1) that at the time of appointment order issued to the petitioner a criminal prosecution was pending against him and (2) the petitioner was actively involved in politics. 3. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader on behalf of respondents and we have perused the findings recorded by the Tribunal. Upon perusal of said findings we do not notice any perversity in the reasoning of the Tribunal to warrant any interference in this petition questioning the order of the Tribunal. 4. We accordingly, dismiss this petition summarily with no order as to costs. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [ P. V. HARDAS, J.] bsb/Aug.10