1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. C.A.No.2396/2007 Pritesh Subhashrao Chede Vs. State of Mah. and another Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE, J. DATED : 25/2/2008 Heard Mrs. Barabde, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Mirza, learned A. P. P. for respondent no.1 and Mr. Hussain, learned counsel for respondent no.2. By this application, the applicant, who is accused no.3 in Sessions Trial No. 19/2006 challenges criminal prosecution against him. It is not disputed that the charge-sheet has already been filed against the applicant and two accused under Sections 307, 323, 325, 341 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and the case has been committed to the Court of Sessions. According to Mrs. Barabde, the name of the applicant does not figure in the said report. In any case, mere fact that the name of accused is not mentioned in the First Information Report, by itself, cannot be a 2 ground to quash the criminal proceedings against an accused. In view of the above, I find no merit in the criminal application and the same is dismissed with liberty to the applicant to urge all grounds available in law before appropriate Forum. JUDGE MLA