WP(C) 2402/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. A. Roshid, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ghosh, learned State Counsel. Having regard to the nature of the relief prayed for, this petit ion is disposed of at the motion stage. Shortly put the petitioners’ pleaded case is that they had parti cipated in a process for appointment as Anganwadi Worker and Anganwadi Helper un der the Child Development Project Officer, Gumafulbari I.C.D.S. Project, Dhakua, Dist.-Barpeta. The process was launched through an advertisement published in t he month of March 2007. In course of the exercise that was undertaken, an interv iew was held between 24/4/2007 and 30/4/2007. The petitioners duly appeared in t he interview, which was held by a duly constituted selection Board. As inspite o f the above, according to the petitioner, the process has not yet been completed , being aggrieved by the undue delay, they are before this Court seeking redress . Upon hearing the learned Counsel for the parties and on a consid eration of the facts as above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Director of Social Welfare, Guwahati, to cause necessary steps to be taken f or a decision on the above process within a period of two weeks herefrom. It is made clear that if in the meantime a decision in fact has been taken, the exerci se need not be repeated. Needless to say, the order/decision would be taken stri ctly in accordance with law. As the petitioners are before this Court with a gri evance that they are ignorant of the result of the process in which they have pa rticipated, the aforementioned authority would ensure that the decision that is to be taken or taken meanwhile would be intimated to them in writing. No costs.