THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.13606 of 2006 DATED: 06.07.2006 Between N.Siva Prakash Reddy. .. PETITIONER Versus The Superintending Engineer, Rural Water Supply Circle, Kadapa, and another. .. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION NO.13606 of 2006 ORDER: Heard both the learned counsel. The matter is coming up for admission. 2. The Writ Petition is filed praying for a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not taking further action as per the Memo issued by the 1st respondent in Memo No.1516/Rep./AEE1/2004, dated 10.9.2004 for payment of EMD and other deductions made from the petitioner’s bills of RWS works by the respondents as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, discriminative and against Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to take further action as per the Memo issued by the 1st respondent in Memo No.1516/Rep./AEE1/2004, dated 10.9.2004 for payment of EMD and other deductions made from the petitioner’s bills of RWS works by the respondents and pass such other suitable orders. 3. It is stated that the writ petitioner also made a representation on 5.5.2006 to the 2nd respondent. Several other factual details had also been narrated in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition. It is also stated that despite the representation and despite the repeated requests, his grievance is not being considered. It is also stated that the 1st respondent directed to settle the amount and despite the same, the amount is not settled. 4. In view of the above, the 2nd respondent is hereby directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 5.5.2006 in accordance with law within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the direction indicated above, the Writ Petition is disposed. No costs. -------------------------- 06.07.2006 SSR