IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29096 of 2011 Rakesh Kumar Tufan, son of Ram Lal Prasad, resident of village – Amber Siristal, Sangat Gali, Biharsharif, Nalanda, P.S. – Biharsharif, District – Nalanda at Biharsharif. ------Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar -------Opposite Party ******* 05. 29.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Bihar P.S. Case No. 144/2011 for the offences under Sections 406/420/467/468/471/34 of the Indian Penal Code, is one of the named accused in this case with allegation of siphoning substantial amount from the informant to provide appointment in Railways and verification of original papers etc. Submission is that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to filing of complaint case (Annexure – 5) against police authorities. Moreover, there is absolutely nothing specifically against the petitioner. Learned counsel representing the informant in spite of appearing suo motu failed to file counter affidavit even after availing several adjournments or more on the other grounds. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda, Biharsharif, in connection with Bihar P.S. Case No. 144/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)