.(‘@\W\§/ “WRIT PE’I‘ITEOE 'G'NBER ‘zaxRTICLE 22$;22? OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDh§ FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT {N THE EATURE OF MANDAMU$ c PROHIBITION {EERTEORARI ETC.GR 3NY GTHER DIRECTION GR DRDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. LN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIEXEARH AT BILASPUR Nai- J-é 2/ Writ Pegm'on am"! PFHHONER .' OH: 13rakash Skunkeshariaf f" /f Sf ca Late Shti I) f" Qankesharia; Aged about 29 yams, ‘ VVUI‘ldILg as Cla‘kvTypis’t 1'11 mmtfisgarh RajyaW Eank Maryadik, Nehru Chowk,Biiaspur, Rm 2T? EGmE, Vjkas N§ga£ .‘> Hemd— Bllaggw $z G — Kayla— RESPONDENT : 1. State af mmttisgaiih, Thmagh Secretarv, GenamL Admixtisfrmion Depaxtmmt, Mamralaya, Shamri Chowk, 2. Ctmttisgarh Rajya Sahkari. Bank NEaryadit; thrgugh I’ae’Iamagig {hiadcm Head Office at Indira. Gandhi Wavsayik Fmishar, Fandri, Ralpur (C.G3. 3 Managa“, Chha’ctisgarh Rajya Sahkari Bank Maryadi't Head Office at Indira Gandhi $33 8%“ V‘yavsagik Faxishar, F’aHdxi, gg a Raipur (CG ). / x/ iw , (b‘6) 7 /w i Erawj z Mamagm; awX§£¥g§ Chhakf$garh Fa} 1a Salxkaii EeLrLk Maryadit, Nehiu Gwwk, Bi‘lafspur (C‘Gé; @ WW WRIT PETITION N0. 1122 of 2007. : Om Prakash Sonkesharia. VERSUS I RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. A_gnihotr_iJ_J. PETITIONER Present: Shri Aja§7 Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.1. ORDER (ORAL), (Passed on 215‘ day of July, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though, the petitioner is in possession of the caste certificate issued by the Tehsildar, Balaghat, Madhya Pradesh, which was issued on 6.9.1995, the petitioner is required to obtain a caste certificate from the State of Chhattisgarh. Thus, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a fresh application for grant of social status certificate and further a direction to the respondent-authorities concerned to consider his case and pass appropriate order in accordance withrlaw. . The petitioner, accordingly is granted one week time to make appropriate application before the competent authority. In the event, application is flled, he competent authority is directed to consider the case in accordance with law andipass appropriate order/issue certificate, if any, Within a period of four weeks. . Having regard to the fact that the petitioner is already in service of Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahkari Bank‘Maryadit i-.e. the respondent No. 2, and further none has appeared nor is any representation made on behalf of the respondent No. 2 t0 4, the respondent No. 2 to 4 are directed not to take any action against the petitioner for a period of six weeks. . With the aforesaid observation and directions, the writ petition is dismissed as Withdrawn With liberty, as aforestated‘ r/wy’w#’ i Sdl- _ . Satish K. Agmhotn Judge t i