^. ^^ (^ OF AT Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Dj.'ip Raosaheb Deshmi levie'A- Petltion No. 14 of 2008 A3i3!lcan*s 1. Smt. Rukmani Sai. aged 52 years, W/c Naravan Prasad Sharma. 2. Narayan Prasad Sharma, aged 60 years, S/o Prithvi Rai Sharma. 3. Dharmendra, aged 35 years, S/o Naraya" Prasad ShanTia, All R/o Qr.No.227; Santra Badi, Durg, Tah. and District Duig (C.G.) Vsrsys Non-aosilcant Nand Kishor Vyas, aged 58 years, S/o Babu'lai Vyas, R/o Qr.No.1, Rice Bran Oii Mill Parisar. Dhamdha Naka, Durg, Tahsi and District Durg (C.G.) RsuiewPetstJoii undsrSectlon 114 read wlth Order47 Rute 1 ofCisil Procedure Code. Present : Shri Ravindra Agrawal, counsel for the applicants. ORAL ORDER sassed on 21s' ofAprit, Heard on l.A.No.1, an appiication for condonation of delay in filing the revlew Detition. (2) I.A.No.1 is ailowed and the delay in filing the review petition js condonsd. (3) Heard on the review petition under Section 114 read with Order 47 !?l!'a " f. r2 f. \^.!~ .\^. (4) The only ground urged by Shri Ravindra Agrawal, learned counsel for the applicants is that this Court did not consider that statement of respondent/plaintiff Nand Kishore Vyas was not recorded by ths trial Court. Howsvsr, this Is not correct. The stand taken by the appeHsrits./defendants In cross exam.ination of Smt. Tuisi Vyas that the rsspondsnt/Diaintiff Nand Kishore Was had suffered from -iemicaresis and was unabie to dspose before the Court was considered by this Court whiie dismissing the appea! at the admission stsge.. (5) No ground for review of the order dated 4.2.2008 passed ;n F.A.Mo.12/2008 is shown. !n ths rssult, the review petitioR is dismissed. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge