(1) Criapln2322-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2322 OF 2010 Kaveribai wd/o Santoshrao Bagal APPLICANT VERSUS Madhavrao Sonaji Bagal & others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. P.G. Gunale, advocate for the applicant. Mr. N.B. Patil, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State. Mr. P.R. Katneshwarkar, advocate for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4. ..... CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J. DATED : 17th JUNE, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By the present application, the applicant is seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the respondents No. 1 to 4, vide order dated 7th November, 2009, passed by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Basmathnagar in Cri. M.A. No. 203/2009. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant at bar that at the time of granting (2) Criapln2322-10 anticipatory bail, a condition was put to the respondents No. 1 to 4/accused not to tamper with the prosecution evidence, however, FIR is filed against the applicant by the respondents/accused. Further it is submitted that she was cheated by the respondents/ accused by getting certain adoption deed registered. 4. Filing of the FIR would not amount to any tampering with the prosecution evidence. The learned counsel for the applicant agrees that the applicant can very well avail the remedies for quashing of the FIR. Further, certain attempt to create any adoption deed would not be a ground for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the respondents/accused. In the circumstances, the application is dismissed. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] NPJ/criapln2322-10