1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 80 OF 2003 in WRIT PETITION NO. 3638 OF 2001 (Krishna Narayan Wanjari vs. Jai Bharti Shikshan Sanstha & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. AUGUST 22, 2008. None for the contempt petitioner. Shri De, learned counsel appears for the respondents. There was no appearance even on 11.6.2008, 4.7.2008, 25.7.2008 and 31.7.2008. The respondents have filed additional submissions on affidavit on 1.8.2008 wherein they have mentioned that the petitioner joined his duty on 24.7.2007 and signed the attendance register whenever he was present. It is their case that they have not disobeyed any orders of this Court. They have pointed out that in writ petition also the employee moved civil application but that was dismissed on 29.11.2003. In the circumstances, it is apparent that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the 2 matter and also no contempt has been demonstrated. This Court on 29.11.2003 while passing orders on writ petition has given liberty to him to resort to appropriate remedy in accordance with law. In the circumstances, no case of contempt of Court is made out. Contempt Petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.