IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH AUGUST 2011 / 19TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 21800 of 2011(Y) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- JAYATHILAKAN,AGED 80,S/O. MAMAKUTTY, PANDARATHIL HOUSE,KUNDAZHIYOOR DESOM, ENGANDIYOOR AMSOM DESOM,CHAVAKKAD TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT., REVENUE DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, COLLECTORATE,AYYANTHOLE,THRISSUR 680 003. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.M.R.RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.21800/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE DOCUMENT BEARING NO.1343/1873 DTD. 11.10.1973 OF THE MUNDATHIKODE S. R.O. P2- COPY OF THE DOCUMENT BEARING NO.1342/1973 DTD. 11.10.1973 OF THE MUNDATHIKODE S.R.O. P3:- COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION OF THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR DTD. 10.5.2010. P4:- COPY OF THE REQUEST OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT DTD. NIL. P5:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WPC. 31255/09 DTD. 3.12.2010. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ............................................. W.P.(C).21800/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 10th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT According to the petitioner, he made an application under Section 10 of the Malabar Land Registration Act, 1896. On receipt of the application, the second respondent obtained Ext.P3 report. Orders were not passed on the application and complaining of the delay, petitioner filed Ext.P4 representation also. In spite of it, orders have not been passed and that led the petitioner to file this writ petition. 2. Thus, the application filed by the petitioner on which Ext.P3 report was obtained by the second respondent, is pending consideration. Therefore, I direct the second respondent to consider the application in the light of Ext.P3 report, as expeditiously as possible. This shall be done with notice to the petitioner within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs