IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23487 of 2010 VISHESHWAR PANDIT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 09.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail in connection with a case registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that the petitioner being the sub post master misappropriated the huge amount by transferring from the account of the different Account-holders. With the similar allegation earlier the petitioner was made accused in Chowk P.S. Case No. 154 of 2006 in which the petitioner was granted bail by the Apex Court vide Annexure-3. It is submitted that from perusal of initial averments of the F.I.R. it is apparent that the present F.I.R. has been lodged in sequence to the earlier F.I.R. Though in the present F.I.R. the allegation is with regard to the different Account- holders. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that though the petitioner was in jail since 18.07.2008 to 14.12.2009 2 but maliciously the prosecution did not remand the petitioner in the present case and has remanded on 15.03.2010. Considering the fact that with the similar allegation the earlier F.I.R. was lodged in which the petitioner is on bail and the present F.I.R. has been lodged in sequence to the earlier F.I.R. with the same allegation, let the petitioner, Visheshwar Pandit, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, in connection with Chowk P.S. Case No. 130 of 2008. It is made clear that the petitioner will appear regularly during the trial in both the cases and if he fails to appear either of the cases on three consecutive dates, then the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)