IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.5883 of 2008 Between: 1 Vankala Papayyamma, W/o. Vankala Papayya, R/o. 10-21/11, Plot No. 454, Visalakshi Nagar, Visakhapatnam. 2 V.Ch.V. Ramanamurthy, S/o. Vankala Polipalli, R/o. 11-254, Sri Dattasai Nagar, Prahaladapuram, Visakhapatnam. 3 V.N.V. Srinivasa Rao, S/o. V. Gurumurthy, R/o. 2-15-50/1, Sector-9, M.V.P. Colony, Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector, Visakhapatnam. 2 The Tahasildar, (Mandal Revenue Officer), Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam. 3 The Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority, Siripuram Junction, Visakhapatnam, Rep. by its Vice Chairman. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of the respondents in trying to dispossess the Petitioners and interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner with regard to the land admeasuring Ac. 3-50 Cents in Sy.No. 331/7 of the 1st petitioner Ac. 3-00 in Sy.No. 331/6 of the 2nd petitioner Ac. 3-47 Cents in Sy.No. 331/8 of the 3rd Petitioner situated in Madhurawada Village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam as arbitrary, illegal and violative of principles of natural justice and fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioners under Articles 14 of the Constitution of India and the right under Article 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from the said land otherwise than due process of law and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.V.V.N.NARASIMHAM Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3: SMT.V.PREETHI REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. A letter to this effect is also filed with the Registry. Accordingly, permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. N.V.RAMANA, J Date 08.06.2009 va