IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29521 of 2009 SHANKAR SAH,son of late Ganesh Sah, resident of village-Modhra,P.S.-Korha, District-Katihar. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Arti Devi, D/o Ram Bilash Sah,R/o village- Giryama,P.S.-Falka,Dist.- Katihar. ----------- 04/ 04-01-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the complainant herself has deserted the petitioner; otherwise no question arises about any demand making the case of dowry demand. To me also it appears that financial position of the family is the reason behind filing of the case otherwise after service of notice complainant is not appearing to resolve the differences. In the suggested facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in Complaint Case No.1820 of 2005, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )