IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No. M-5234 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: September 14, 2011 Dhanpati Devi and others ... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr.Narender Sura, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Satyavir Singh Yadav, Dy. Adv. General, Haryana for respondent – State. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) The petitioners, by filing this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, have sought quashing of First Information Report (for short 'FIR) No.158 dated May 10th, 2010 (Annexure P1) registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') in Police Station Palam Vihar, Gurgaon. By order dated February 17th, 2011, Daya Chaudhary, J. directed the parties to appear before the trial Court and the trial Court was directed to record the statements of the parties. In compliance with the same, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurgaon recorded the statements of the parties, whereby, they stated that they have compromised the matter. Compromise-deed (Annexure P2) has also been placed on record. Indeed, the dispute between the parties was of personal nature. In view of this, there should not be any impediment in allowing the parties to compromise the matter. Support to this view can be had from the authority 'Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab' 2008 (2) RCR (Criminal) 429, wherein, Hon'ble Supreme Court has ruled that in such type of cases, where the dispute is of personal nature, Court should ordinarily, accept the compromise. In view of above, petition is accepted. Consequently, FIR No.No.158 dated May 10th, 2010 (Annexure P1) registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 IPC in Police Station Palam Vihar, Gurgaon and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed. September 14, 2011 ( NAWAB SINGH ) `gian' JUDGE