~""--" 'a^ (3) BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C No. H\ /2011 ~^^~ (Arising out of order dated 08.09.2010 passed in W.P. (C) No. 4776/2009 by Single Bench ofthis Hon'ble Court) APPLICANT RESPONDENTS Kumar Kotangle, S/o Shri Mekchand Kotangle, aged about 36 years, R/o Sanjay Nagar Akaltara, Tahsil Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) VERSUS 1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Secretary, Scheduled Caste & Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 21 State Level High Power Caste Verification Committee, Raipur, (Tribal Research and Training Institution), Through - It's Director, University Campus, Raipur Distt. Raipur(C.G.) APPLICATIQN FOR MODIFICATION/CLARIFICATION QF ORDER DATED 0^09.2010 PASSED IN W.P. (C) No. 4776/2009 ^""" -Cl^—- ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPUR APPLICANT RESPONDENTS M.C.C.No. 171of2011. Durgesh Kumar Kotangle. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Aiiother. APPLICATION FOR MODIFICIATION/CLAmFICATION OF ORDER DATED 08.09.2010 PASSED IN W.P. (C)No. 4776/2009 SB: Hon'ble Shri SatishK. Agiuhotri,J. Present: Shri Anup Majumdar, Advocate fbr the applicant. Sliri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondents. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 29th day ofMarch, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the applicant submits that tliis Court, disposed of W.P.(8) No. 4776 of 2009 (Durgesh Kumar Kotangle v. State of Chhattisgarh & Another) on 08.09.2010 in terms of the decision of this Court m Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria v. State of Chattisgarh & Others . Thereafter, the applicant approached the respondent No. 2 and submitted his application for veritlcation ofliis caste certificate along^dth the application of his brother. But the respondent No. 2 again demanded documents prior to 08.12.1950 for verification ofhis social status. The applicant requested the autliorities to consider and decide his case in accordance with the order passed by this Court mDmeshKumarBhagorm (supra). 2. Shi'i Majumdar further submits that since no speciflc time limit has been prescribed in the order passed in 08.09.2010, the respondent authorities are not considering and deciding his case and more than six months have already passed. TTie applicant is appearitig before the 1 W.P.(S)No. 3338/2007, decidedon 19.08,2010 \/ respondent No. 2 since July, 2009. Thus, a suitable direction may be issued to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the case of the petitioner within a specific time limit. 3. On pemsal ofthe order dated 8.09.2010 (Annexure C/l) it is evident that the said petition was disposed of in teiTas of the order passed in Dinesh Kiimar Bhagoria (supra). There is no fault found with the said order and the same is clear and unambiguous. The order dated 08.09.2010 has to be read alongwith order dated 19.08.2010 passed in Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria (supra). n[\m^ no modification/clarification is required in the order dated 08.09.2010, passed in W.P.(C) No. 4776/2009. 4. Accordingly, the application is disposed of j Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge