IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.28473 of 2010 GANESH SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 24.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. For the offence under Section 395 of I.P.C. petitioner’s name appeared in the case taking into consideration his earlier behaviour including having relation with Sudha Devi and the act of teasing like behaviour that was opposed by villagers and in that continuation, it is said that threatening was given. According to the learned counsel, that may not be suspected for commitment of dacoity basing which anticipatory bail petition may be rejected. Taking that into consideration, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Parihar P.S. Case No. 112 of 2008 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Sitamarhi subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)