HSQH CQURT QF CHHATTiSSWW AT BtLASPUR Criininat Reviston (PR) Nlo.7682 of 2018 C'-y- ^s-'l '^xslV Petitjoner Medhuram, S,'o Chovaram Sahu, Aged about 25 yeare, Occupation Agricuiturist, R/o Viiiage Bhansuii, Tahsii Bsmetara, District Durg (C.6.) Versus Smt.Ashwani QQI, W/o. Sahu, aged about 22 years, Isdhuram 2. Ghanshyam, S/o Medham Sahu, aged about 4 months, Minor, ttsrough his natural guardian mother Ashwani Bai, , W/o Medhuram Sahu, Both are Rssidsnt of Viilags Bhansuli, Tahsii Bsmetara, District Durg (C.G.) (Criminai Revision under Sectton 19(4) ofthe Famiiy Courts Art) (SB: Hon'bte Mr. T.P. Shamia, J.} Mr.P.P.Sahu, counsel fer ttie petitioner. ORDERsORAL) (Passed on StB iSffarch, 201 1) 1. By this revision, the petitionsr has chattsnged ths Isgality and propriety of the order dated 11.3.2008 passsd by the Third Additiona! Principal Judgs, Famity Court, Camp Court, Bemstara, Distt.Durg in Case No .233/2007. 2. The present revision has been filed after 903 days of its iimtofion. 3. Heard on S.A.No.01 for condonation of deiay in filing the revision and aiso on admission. 4. i have perused the record of the Famiiy Court. 5. The present pstitioner was contested party and he was prssent at the tima of order. i do not find any expianation for deiay of 903 days in fiiing the revision. Evidenc®of bo the parties, espsciaiiy factum of panchayat, sxecution of documents and the fact that respondsnt No.1 v/as with fte present peUUoner more than one and haif montts at the instance of panchayat,! tio not find any merit in fte revision. 6, Conssquentiy, l.A.No.01 is iiable to be dismissed anci it is hereby dismissed. Rsvision is aiso ctismissed. Sd/- T.P.Sharma Judge >) /