1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 360 OF 2007. 1. Mr. Sadanand K. Narvekar, aged 50 years, son of late Krishna Jairam Narvekar, in business; and his wife 2. Mrs.Kala Sadanand Narvekar, aged about 45 years, wife of Petitioner No.1, housewife; 3. Mr. Siddesh Sadanand Narvekar aged about 22 years, son of Sadanand Narvekar, All residents of Maina, Pilerne, Bardez- Goa. 4. Mrs Vilashini S. Narvekar aged about 45 years, widow of late S.K. Narvekar, resident of Maina, Pilerne, Bardez-Goa. ..... Petitioners. Versus 1. Mrs. Maria Catarina Sebastiana D'Souza, aged 76 years, Landlady, widow of Lawrence Libanio T. D'Souz, resident of House No.151, Moicavaddo, Pilerne, Bardez-Goa. 2. Mrs. Angela Rose Viegas, aged 41 years, married, housewife, daughter of late Lawrence Libanio T. D'Souza, resident of House No.98, Moicavaddo, pilerne, Bardez Goa. 3. Mrs. Maria Preciosa Aurora D'Souza, aged 81 years, landlady, 2 widow of Julius Claudius D'Souza, resident of House No.55, Moicavaddo, Pilerne, Bardez- Goa. 4. Mrs. Marlene Dolwani, aged 51 years, wife of Mr. Dilip Dolwani, resident of HouseNo.55, Moicavaddo, Pilerne, Bardez- Goa. 5. Mrs. Maria Nicolete Melanie D'Souza, aged 46 years, wife of Mr. Roger D'Souza, resident of HouseNo.55, Moicavaddo, Pilerne, Bardez- Goa. 6. Mrs. Maria Agnes Melita D'Souza, aged 43 years, resident of House No.55, Moicavaddo, Pilerne, Bardez- Goa. 7. Ms. Maria Macella Mavis Pereira, aged 40 years, wife of Mr. Prakash Gabriel Pereira; 8. Mr. Prakash G. Pereira, aged 48 years, son of Luis Anthonio Pereira in business, Both residents of House No.891/1,Socorro, Panchayat Road, Porvorim, Bardez-Goa. ..... Respondents. Mr. P. Rao, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. J. E. Coelho Pereira, Senior Advocate with Mr. V. Korgaonkar, Advocate for the respondents. Coram :- S. A. BOBDE, J. Date : - 10th April, 2008. 3 ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent. 2. After hearing the matter for some time, following order is passed by consent : a) The order of the appellate Court granting injunction is hereby set aside. b) The appellate Court shall decide the appeal afresh after hearing both sides. c) Till the appeal is decided, the defendants are restrained from carrying out further construction in the suit structure in the suit property. 3. Rule is made absolute accordingly. The writ petition disposed of. S. A. BOBDE, J. SMA