IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 1ST AUGUST 2011 / 10TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 19261 of 2011(G) ----------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- JAYARAM, S/O. SIVADASAN, JAI HIND MANDIRAM, NILAKKAMUKKUM, VAKKAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. DEPUTY COLLECTOR (GENERAL), COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KUDAPPANAKKUNNU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 19261 of 2011(G) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE LICENCE NO. 49124/98. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 20/11/06 PASSED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE WRIT PETITION, WP(C) NO. 2549/2007 DATED 18/1/07 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM. EXT.P4 : COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 23/3/09 IN WP(C) NO. 2549/07 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM. EXT.P5 : COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 5/9/09 FROM THE STATION OFFICER, FIRE AND STATION OFFICER, FIRE AND RESCUE STATION, ATTINGAL. EXT.P6 : COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 10/9/09 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXT.P7 : COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 10/9/09 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXT.P8 : COPY OF THE CHELAN RECEIPT DATED 18/9/09. EXT.P9 : COPY OF THE CHELAN RECEIPT DATED 18/9/09. EXT.P10 : COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 29/10/09 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P11 : COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 8/12/09. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 19261 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of August , 2011 J U D G M E N T The first prayer in this writ petition is to quash Ext.P10. Consequential reliefs are also sought for. 2. Ext.P10 order is dated 29.10.2009. The writ petition does not contain any explanation regarding the delay in challenging Ext.P10. 3. The writ petition is filed at this distance of time, deserves rejection for the delay and laches. Hence this petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-