1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 260 OF 2004 Master Gaurav Prakash Naik Khaunte and others. ... Petitioners versus State of Goa through its Secretary of Education and others. ... Respondents Mr. V. P. Thali, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. G. Bhonsle, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : R. M. LODHA & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. DATE : 12TH SEPTEMBER,2005. P.C.:­ By a separate Order passed today, we permitted Mr. V. P. Thali, the learned Counsel for the Petitioners to withdraw his appearance from the case. The learned Counsel has already notified to the Petitioners that for want of instructions to him he would not 2 be in a position to proceed with the matter. It appears that no instructions have been given to Mr. Thali, the learned Counsel. It may be because nothing remains in the Writ Petition. As it is looking to the subject matter in the Writ Petition, we are satisfied that by passage of time and particularly the interim Order dated 28­6­2004 nothing remains to be decided in the matter and the Petitioners may have lost interest in the Writ Petition. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. R. M. LODHA, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.