IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2011 / 21ST POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 955 of 2011(T) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- T.A.RATNAKARAN,S/O.ACHUTHAN,AGED 48 YRS, THAYATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE,P.O.PALLIPORT,MUNAMBAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. PALLIPPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY,PALLIPURAM.P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 683 514. 2. UNION OF INDIA,REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS, PARYAVARAN BHAVAN,C.G.O.COMPLEX,LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI.110 006 R2 BY ADV. SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN,ASST.S.G OF INDIA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO.955 OF 2011 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of January, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner and his sibling possess 103 cents of land in Kuzhuppilly Village, Kochi Taluk. They have submitted Ext.P2 application for building permit before the first respondent. The said application was rejected as per Ext.P3 order dated 29.11.2010. It is contended that subsequent to the passing of Ext.P3, a fresh notification dated 15.9.2010 was published by the second respondent. A re- consideration of the issue in the light of notification dated 15.9.2010 is required, it is further submitted. Ext.P5 representation was submitted for reconsideration of Ext.P2 application in the aforesaid circumstances. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned standing counsel appearing for the first respondent. The learned standing counsel appearing for the first respondent submitted that in view of the subsequent developments, Ext.P5 would be considered. In view of the said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 representation expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of W.P.(C) NO.955/2011 2 receipt of a copy of this judgment. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc W.P.(C) NO.955/2011 3 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. JUDGMENT September, 2010