WP(C) 2934/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY The petitioners were appointed as Hindi Teachers in different provincialised sch ools in the year 1993 and are aggrieved by non-disbursal of their arrear salary between August 1996 to April, 1999. Mr. M. R. Pathak, learned Standing Counsel for the Education Department, submits that the possible reasons for non-disbursal of the salary for the above period may be on account of the fact that, regular posts were unavailable then against which, the salaries of the petitioners could be drawn. He further submits that f resh posts of Hindi Teachers were created subsequently in the year 1999, and tha t is how the petitioners are receiving their current salary w.e.f. April, 1999. Since similar grievances of non-payment of salary of appointed teachers is being examined by a court appointed committee, Mr. Pathak further submits that the ca ses of the three petitioners should be ordered to be examined by the said commit tee. Mr. Y. S. Mannan, learned counsel is agreeable to consideration of the petitio ners grievances by the committee constituted, in pursuant to the direction given by this Court in Sudhendu Mohan Talukdar and Ors. -Vs.- State of Assam and Ors. reported in 2006 (2) GLT 216. In view of the above agreement of the rival laywers, the petitioners are permitt ed to file their respective representation(s before the Director of Secondary. D SE(S), who in turn will facilitate the committee to examine the grievances of th e petitioners. The written representation(s) in terms of this order may be filed by the petitioners, within two weeks from today. The case is disposed with the above order.