1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. WRIT PETITION NO. 385 OF 2011 [Abdul Hafiz S/o Abdul Huk VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors.] Mr. C.V. Thombre, Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for the respondent-State Mr. S.S. Tope, Advocate for respondent no.3 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders P.C.:- 1. At the outset, learned counsel for respondent no.3 submits that Reference, as contemplated by section 12 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949, has already been made by the Corporation to the Judge, and the matter is pending before the Court in respect of the disqualification of respondent no.4. Having confronted with this, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the Writ Petition. Petition is disposed of as not pressed. Sd/- Sd/- [ M.T. JOSHI, J. ] [ D.B. BHOSALE, J. ] DT. : 29.03.2011 arp