Civil Writ Petition No.8888 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8888 of 2011 Date of Decision:19.05.2011 M/s Surjit Singh Jaswinder Jit Singh ......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR. Present: Mr.Baljinder Singh Sra, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** M EHINDER S INGH S ULLAR , J.(oral) The petitioner-Firm has preferred the present writ petition for quashing the impugned action of the District Controller, Food and Civil Supply, Department-respondent No.2, refusing to make the amendment in the wholesale licence issued to it in respect of the distribution of kerosene oil in its new premises. Issue notice of motion to the Advocate General, Punjab. At this stage, Mr.Sartaj Singh Gill, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notices on behalf of the respondents, at the asking of the Court. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the controversy involved in the instant writ petition is squarely covered and deserves to be disposed of in the same terms of the judgment dated 31.03.2011 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court (Surya Kant, J.), rendered in Civil Writ Petition No.5718 of 2011 titled as M/s Subhash Lubricant Versus State of Punjab and others, the operative part of which is, as under:- “Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the considered view that since the petitioner has already informed the District Magistrate, Amritsar about the shifting of the new site, it Civil Writ Petition No.8888 of 2011 2 would be in the petitioner's own interest and benefit to obtain a fresh No Objection Certificate from the District Magistrate, more so when the new site has already been approved by the District Controller of Food and Supply and Consumer Affairs at Amritsar. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall be allowed to operate its godown from the new site and meanwhile, the District Magistrate, Amritsar, if so required, may visit the new site and if nothing objectionable is found, to accord necessary approval to the petitioner. The needful shall be done within a period of one month from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.” In this view of the matter and after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record with their valuable help and after deep consideration of the entire matter, the instant writ petition is also disposed of in the same terms of the judgment dated 31.03.2011 as in M/s Subhash Lubricant's case(supra). May 19, 2011 (MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR) seema JUDGE