IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 14030 of 2002 Between : S.Sridevi, D/o.Mohan Rao, R/o.B.I.O F2, Yusafguda Check Post, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Vice Chairman & Housing Commissioner, A.P.Housing Board, Gruhakalpa, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2 The Executive Engineer, North Division, A.P.Housing Board, Bharathnagar Colony, Hyderabad. 3 Mrs. M.Padmavathi, R/o.LIG.H.185, IVth Phase, Gachibowli, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent not allotting the MIGH 126 on outright sale basis 100% category to the petitioner where she is the nest successor in waiting list No.1 after the 3rd respondent withdrawal from the regular allotment is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the principles of natural justice, consequently direct the 2nd respondent to allot MIGH 126 on outright sale as per the notification dt:27.10.2000 by set a side Lr.No.5685/GB/EM6/EE(N)/12 dated:4.6.2002 of the 2nd respondent where the petitioner is entitled to get the house and to pass such other and further order or orders, as this Honourable Court may deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.KARRI SURYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: MS.G.SUDHA The Court made the following : ORDER : There is no representation on behalf of either of the parties, when the matter is called. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 21st April 2009 ajr