CIVIL REVISION NO.1875 OF 2006 :{ 1 }: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: APRIL 24, 2008 Hawa Singh .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. M. R. Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Lekh Raj Nandal, AAG, Haryana, for the respondents. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. While seeking execution of a decree passed in his favour, the petitioner moved an execution petition for direction to the respondent/judgment-debtors to make payment of arrears as per the pay scale of Rs.1200-2040 to the petitioner-decree holder. Concededly, the decree, execution of which is sought, was to the effect that the petitioner-decree holder be appointed as a Mechanical Fitter/Helper. It is not disputed before me that the petitioner has been so appointed and has also been paid a sum of Rs.86,110/- vide bank draft on the basis of a pay scale of Rs.950- CIVIL REVISION NO.1875 OF 2006 :{ 2 }: 1400/-. The petitioner, however, contests that he is entitled to a pay scale of Rs.1200-2040 as having been adjusted as Mechanical Fitter/Helper. This, however, is denied by the respondent-J.Ds on the ground that this grade, as per the rules, only relates to new recruits and is not to operate retrospectively. It is further pointed out that eligibiblity for this grade is to those appointees who compulsorily have a knowledge of English and Hindi besides being physically fit and qualified in field test. Matric with I.T.I. Diploma is not required for Mechanical Fitter/Helper, which the petitioner possesses. It is to be noted that no direction was given by the Court whihle passing a decree that the petitioner is entitled to any particular pay scale. Directions only were to adjust the petitioner as Mechanical Fitter/Helper, which has been complied with. The petitioner claims that he is required to be adjusted in the pay scale of Rs.1200-2040 as per the rules and his qualification, which is in dispute. According to the J.D-respondents the petitioner is entitled to a pay scale of Rs.950-1400, which has been granted to him and arrears paid. During the course of arguments, the learned counsel representing the petitioner made reference to some order passed in the writ petitiion, where persons similarly situated and holding similar qualifications were ordered to be granted pay scale of Rs.1200-2040 and accoridngly prays that the petitioner be also grante dthe same pay scale on the ground of parity. The petitioner is in a revision against an order, whereby he had sought execution of a decree. The right of the petitioner to be adjusted in this pay scale can not be determined and it is only to be seen if such a direction can be given for executing the decree. Since there was no direction with regard to CIVIL REVISION NO.1875 OF 2006 :{ 3 }: pay scale, the impugned order can not be said to be suffering from any infirmity while the prayer of the petitioner for grant of particular pay scale is declined. No case for interference is made out. The petition is accodingly dismissed. April 24 ,2008 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE