1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 5020/2010 Shri Gokul Annaji Kokre Vs. Collector and others. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. A. S. Kilor, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kankale, AGP for respondents 1 to 4. Mr. A. M. Ghare, Advocate for respondent nos. 5. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DECEMBER 1, 2010. Contention is voters list of constituency under Byelaw No. 30(1)(d) of respondent no.5 District Central Cooperative Bank contains names of several defunct co-operative societies and also of persons who are not cooperative societies at all. Attention is invited to Sr. No.14 where Z. P. Amravati has been enrolled as voter. Learned counsel states that there are about 60 such instances. Learned AGP on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4 states that about 40 societies were already removed and then voters list was finalised. He further states that after filing of petition inquiry was made by District Deputy Registrar . Said authority has recommended eight more societies for deletion. Advocate Ghare states that recommendation of District Deputy Registrar cannot be accepted as 2 those eight societies are not parties before this Court. According to learned counsel disputed question arises and petition should not be entertained. According to Advocate Kilor records of respondents 1 to 4 demonstrate that these societies cannot be included in the voters list. There is no question of disputed issue arises and respondent no.1 has to correct voters list in accordance with those records and findings. I find that eight societies, whose names have been recommended by District Deputy Registrar are not parties before this Court. The alleged report of District Deputy Registrar therefore cannot be accepted and acted upon by this Court when elections are scheduled on 4.12.2010 only. Hence, with liberty to petitioner to take further appropriate steps as are open in law, present petition is disposed of. However, respondent no.1 shall note the situation which has come on record and take appropriate disciplinary action in the matter to see that such mistakes are not repeated in future. JUDGE ambulkar