1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.241 OF 2000 (Vilas Maruti Pund Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. K.N.Lokhande, Adv., h/f Mr. B.V.Wagh, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. K.M.Suryawanshi, APP, for respondent/State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:25/8/2009 ... P.C.: 1. The original complainant has challenged order of acquittal recorded on 23.5.2000 by learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Shrirampur, for an offense under Sections 457, 427, 379 read with Section 34 of IPC. 2. The findings recorded by the learned Judge that it was a civil dispute between the parties in which an injunction was sought by the complainant and he failed, and thereafter the allegations of entering the field or theft are 2 made does not require any interference. The assessment of the evidence of the complainant Vilas that other witnesses in support thereof could not ultimately indicate any infraction on the part of the accused. No perversity in the order under challenge. Interference not warranted. Criminal Revision Application dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/241-00crra ...