1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 3306/09 [ Dnyaneshwar Kawadu Kumbhalkar vs. State of Maharashtra ] ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. P.S.Wathore, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. A.D.Sonak, APP, for respondent State CORAM : P.D. KODE, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 27, 2009. Heard. The submission of the learned counsel for the applicant that the F.I.R does not depict the date on which the applicant had agreed to marry with the daughter of the complainant and the statement of witness Arvind Kamble, dated 3.10.2009, pointed out by the learned APP, in the said context also showing the similar picture apart from the same being recorded after about 5 months after lodging of F.I.R., the applicant has made out a case for issuing protection under the provisions of Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure. Inform the Investigating Officer of Crime No. 3015 of 2009 registered with Gadchiroli Police Station for offence under Section 417 of I.P.C and Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, that in the event of arrest of the applicant in connection with the said crime, the applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail up till filing of the 2 charge-sheet in the said matter, upon furnishing a P.R.Bond in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- with one or more solvent sureties to make up the said amount and subject to the conditions that applicant shall; (i) make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when called for investigation uptill filing of charge sheet for said crime; (ii) not directly or indirectly making any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of crime under the investigation for dissuading the said person from disclosing the facts within his knowledge to the investigating Officer; (iii) residing at the residential address mentioned in the application and not changing the same without the permission of this Court; (iv)not committing any offence while being on bail granted by this order. By way of clarification, it is added that observations made in this order being made for limited purpose of deciding prayer of granting anticipatory bail made by the applicant, nothing in this order should be construed as an opinion expressed by the Court upon the merits of the matter. 3 Case diary perused and returned. Application stands disposed of. Hamdast allowed. Criminal Application No. 222/2009 In view of the disposal of the main application, this application also stands disposed of. JUDGE Rvjalit