IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19443 of 2008 ------- RAJENDRA SHAH @ RAJENDRA SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 18.7.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Tarari P.S. Case No.66 of 2007 for the alleged offences registered under section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that on perusal of the F.I.R. it would appear that there is general allegation of Marpit. However, there is no specific allegation against this petitioner. Moreover, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the deceased was suffering from some ailment, which resulted in her death and not on account of assault as would be appearing from the case diary though the Doctor did not find any internal or external injury on the person of the deceased. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on perusal of the case diary is 2 not in a position to refute the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner. Considering the submissions, as noticed above, and on perusal of the allegations made in the F.I.R. and the other materials brought on the record, it is directed that petitioner Rajendra Shah @ Rajendra Sah, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Tarari P.S. Case No.66 of 2007 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ara, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)