IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 137 of 2007 Manohar Lal Arora & Others .……… Petitioners. Versus State of Uttaranchal .………. Respondent. Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Advocate for the respondent. Date of decision: 05-03-2010 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) The controversy raised in the instant writ petition is identical to the one in Satish Chandra Jain Vs. State of Uttarakhand & Another (Writ Petition (S/B) No. 554 of 2002, decided on 05.03.2010). In view of the above, since Satish Chandra Jain’s case (supra) has been disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, the instant writ petition is also disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 05.03.2010 05.03.2010 Amit