1 wp2024.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Criminal Writ Petition No. 2024 of 2011 Union of India, Through The Inspector of Police Central Bureau of Investigation ....Petitioner v/s. Jayesh Ramanlal Desai, N.R.I. & anr. ....Respondents Mr. Mandar Goswami for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Desai i/b. A.S. Khan & Associates for respondent no.1. Mr. A.S. Shitole-APP for the State. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 8th August, 2011 PC: By way of present petition, the petitioner-CBI challenges the order passed by the learned Special Judge CBI dated 8th July, 2011 thereby granting permission to the respondent no.1 who is original accused no.3 to travel to Dubai for a period of 18 days. Shri Goswami, the learned Counsel submits that if the applicant is permitted to travel to Dubai, there is likelihood of he tampering with the evidence. 2. The learned trial Court while allowing the application has observed the conduct of respondent no.1. It has been observed that respondent no.1 on receiving a telephone call from the present applicant has come to India and cooperated with the investigation. 2 wp2024.11.sxw 3. No perversity could be noticed with the orders passed by the learned trial Judge while granting the permission. 4. Shri Desai the learned Counsel submits that security which is to be provided as per clause-2 would be that of the real brother of the petitioner. 5. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference. Rejected. 6. At this stage, the learned Counsel for the CBI prays for extension of the interim-relief which was granted on 15th July, 2011. 7. Shri Amit Desai vehemently opposes the said prayer. In the interest of justice, the ad-interim order dated 15th July, 2011 is extended for a period of two weeks from today. (B.R. GAVAI, J)