IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2010 / 21ST JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 35212 of 2009(V) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- SIMI JAYAN, KIZHAKEYIL HOUSE, KOORACHUNDU PO, KOORACHUNDU,CALICUT 673 527. BY ADVS. SRI.P.N.MOHANAN, SRI.K.RAJESH SUKUMARAN. RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. KOORACHUNDU CO-OPERATIVE URBAN SOCIETY LTD. D. 2758,REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, KOORACHUNDU PO, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (G) KOZHIKODE. *ADDL.R3 IMPLEADED: R3. SAJEESH G.S., KUNIYIL HOUSE, KOZHUKKALLUR P.O., MEPPAYUR, KOZHIKODE. (*ADDL.R3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DTD. 25/01/2010 IN I.A.NO.736/10) R1 BY ADVS. SRI.M.M.MONAYE, SRI.M.PAUL VARGHESE, SRI.M.K.GINASH. R2 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.S.MUHAMMED HASHIM ADDL.R3 BY ADVS.SRI.P.A.ABDUL JABBAR, SRI.C.K.RAFEEK. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.35212/2009 V APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION FURNISHED BY THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES. P2: COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN MATHRUBHUMI DAILY DTD. 1/12/09. P3: COPY OF THE LETTER SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P4: COPY OF THE CALL LETTER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT SOCIETY. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: R1(A): COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE DTD. 8/01/2002 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. R1(B): COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE DTD. 29/03/2004 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. R1(C): COPY OF THE OFFICE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DTD. 29/12/2009. /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO.35212 OF 2009 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is a member of the first respondent Society. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the action of the Society in inviting applications to the post of Secretary and proceeding to make appointment directly without the intervention of the Co- operative Service Recruitment Board. It is also submitted that the upper age limit shown in the notification is 36 instead of 37 which is the correct age to be shown. This writ petition was admitted on 22.12.2000 and an order was passed to the effect that any appointment made would be subject to the result of this writ petition. Thereafter, it is submitted that appointments have been made by the first respondent Society. 2. According to the counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P3 representation before the second respondent, Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Kozhikode, which is still pending. It is sufficient that the grievance of the petitioner is considered by the Wpc 35212/2009 2 said authority. Therefore, this writ petition can be disposed of directing Ext.P3 to be considered on an early date. The counsel for the respondents in the case have no objection to such a direction being issued. They only pray that they may also be heard before final orders are passed on Ext.P3. 3. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider the grievances of the petitioner set out in Ext.P3 in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as the first and third respondents in this writ petition. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE lgk