..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2821 OF 2008 Mr.Deepak Bhandari. ..Applicant. Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Shailesh Kantharia, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.K.C.Prasly, Adv. for respondent No.2. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP, for State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 22nd October, 2008. DATED : 22nd October, 2008. DATED : 22nd October, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant-orig.accused and the learned Advocate for respondent No.2-orig.complainant. 2. The applicant has been convicted under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal preferred by the applicant came to be dismissed. Hence, the applicant preferred Criminal Revision Application No.177 of 2007 before this Court. The said Criminal Revision Application No.177 of 2007 came to be dismissed by this Court. Thereafter the ..(2).. applicant preferred the present application for refund of the amount of Rs.2,00,000/- deposited by him in this Court in Criminal Revision Application No.177 of 2007. 3. During pendency of this application, the applicant and the complainant have amicably resolved the dispute and the learned Advocate for the applicant has stated that as per the settlement the complainant be permitted to withdraw Rs.2,00,000/- deposited by the applicant in this Court in Criminal Revision Application No.177 of 2007. In view of this statement, the complainant is permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs.2,00,000- deposited by the applicant in this Court in Criminal Revision Application No.177 of 2007 by receipt No.0811 dated 21.6.2007. The parties tendered the settlement application, which is taken on record. It may be stated here that now the name of the complainant has been changed to Geologging Industries Limited. 4. In the present case the conviction has been confirmed, hence conviction warrant came to be issued against the applicant. In view of the settlement ..(3).. between the parties, on request of learned Counsel for the parties, the said conviction warrant is stayed for ten weeks from today in order to enable the applicant to approach the Supreme Court for compounding of the offence. 5. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)