Civil Revision No. 2109 of 2010 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2109 of 2010 Date of decision: 20.4.2010 Hardeep Singh ...Petitioner Versus Gurdip Kaur ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. S.D.ANAND, J. The impugned order directed the ejectment of the petitioner herein from the tenanted premises on account of non tender of the provisional assessed rent on the first date of hearing. It is apparent, from a perusal of the material obtaining on the file, that provisional assessment of rent was made on 18.5.2009. The rent was not tendered on that date. The matter was adjourned to 17.7.2009. The tender was not made on that date either. The matter was, then, adjourned to 8.8.2009. No tender was made on that date as well. The plea raised before the learned Rent Controller was that tender could not be made on account of negligence of the previous counsel. The plea did not find favour with the learned Rent Controller, and appropriately too. The view obtained by the learned Rent Controller directing the ejectment of the petitioner-tenant from the tenanted premises on account of non tender of provisional Civil Revision No. 2109 of 2010 -2- **** assessed rent was affirmed by the learned Appellate Authority. The view obtained by both the Courts is in accord with the Rakesh Wadhawan Vs. M/s Jagdamba Industrial Corporation, AIR 2002 SC 2004 and a Division Bench judgment of this Court in Civil Revision No.3577 of 2006 (Raj Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar), In the light of foregoing discussion, the petition is held to be denuded of merit and is ordered to be dismissed accordingly. The petitioner shall have two months time from today to vacate the premises aforementioned. April 20, 2010 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge