IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20941 of 2011 Anil Chaudhary Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 21.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. According to the prosecution case, petitioner was wanted in Mohania P.S. Case no. 361/2010 and in search of the petitioner, Officer Incharge of Mohania police station with the help of local police raided the house of the petitioner and huge quantity of heroin and other incriminating articles were recovered from the house as well as from possession of the petitioner. The contention of the learned counsel for petitioner is that name of the petitioner was disclosed before the police by one Gulam Meer @ Langra who was accused in Mohania P.S. Case no. 361/2010 and in search of petitioner, in connection with the above stated case, police raided his house and allegedly, seized heroin in question. So, there was no need to institute another case against the petitioner but I am not at all convinced with the aforesaid submission because the present case is not offshoot of Mohania P.S. Case no. 361/2010. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Baroon P.S. Case no. 272/2010 pending in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad stands rejected. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)