IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2008 / 29TH SRAVANA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 965 of 2008(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.28015/2006 Dated 26/10/2006 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER -------------------------------------- USHAKUMARI, W/O.VIJAYAN PILLAI, KAVITHA NIVAS, CHIRAVOOR, MANGODE VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SAJU.S.A RESPONDENT: RESPONDENT ----------------------- THE SECRETARY, CHITHARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH PANCHAYATH OFFICE, KIZHAKKUMBHAGOM, CHITHARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.LIJU. M.P THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cont.Case (C) No.965 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 20th August, 2008 JUDGMENT Mr.Liju M.P., counsel for the Panchayat submits that all the directions in Annexure I judgment have been complied with. Pursuant to Annexure I, a representation received from the writ petitioner was taken up by the Panchayat. The Panchayat convened a joint conference of the petitioner and the representatives of the unions representing drivers of vehicles and a decision by consensus was arrived at in the said conference. Thus the directions in Annexure I judgment have been complied with. 2. Counsel for the Panchayat also submitted that subsequently the petitioner filed a complaint before the Panchayat stating that the decision taken in the joint conference is being violated by a few drivers. On receiving that complaint the Panchayat has addressed the Police so that the decision taken in the meeting will be implemented. Counsel submitted that parking boards have already been erected so that the decisions taken in the meeting will be implemented strictly. 3. The above submissions of the learned counsel for the COC No.965/08 - 2 - Panchayat are not seriously disputed by counsel for the petitioner. I am therefore of the view that there is no justification for initiating contempt action against the respondent. The Contempt of Court Case will stand closed. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE