AB 1937/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE K. MERUNO Heard Mr. M. Biswas, learned counsel, for the accused petitioner. Also h eard Mr. K. Munir, learned Addl. P.P., for the respondent State of Assam. This application has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Crimin al Procedure, 1973, praying for release of accused petitioner on pre-arrest bail . Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to bail order passed by this Court in Annexure No. 2 wherein prayer for pre-arr est bail to the accused petitioner No. 1(instant petitioner) has been rejected. However, in the same order, the prayer for interim bail was granted to accused p etiotners No. 2 and 3 with a direction to them to approach the concerned Magistr ate for regular bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the dispute betw een the instant petitioner, who is husband of the present complainant i.e. his w ife, has been amicably settled by the Panchayat on 28.02.2011, and since then, t hey are living peacefully as husband and wife. A translated copy of ’dispute settlement’ by the Panchayat on 28.02.2011 has been appended as Annexure-3. Considering this aspect of the matter, the accused petitioner is hereby granted interim bail and he is further directed to approach the court of learned CJM, Cachar, for necessary orders as per the decision of the Panchayat rendered on 28.02.2011, on the dispute between accused husband petitioner and complainan t wife. The bail application accordingly stands disposed of.