IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3758 of 2010 ANIL KUMAR . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 3. 06.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It is submitted that the petitioner was directed to be considered for compassionate appointment in his capacity as an adopted son. The authorities could not have rejected the claim thereafter. From Annexure-A to the show cause, the Court finds that the authorities have considered the claim for compassionate appointment as an adopted son but were not fully satisfied of the factum of adoption in accordance with law. That is an aspect which cannot be adjudicated further in the contempt jurisdiction. If so advised, the petitioner may assail the order in a fresh writ application. The proceeding stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)