(é W )m/ €5‘xinLé: klig‘ggmgzg w: IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(S) No. 39 i5 /2o1o v /’ Mohan Lal Gendle, S/o Shri Ramsai Gendle, aged about , 53 years, Head Master, Govt. Middle School, Karra, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS / PETITIONERS : 1 . State of Chhattisgarh Through :— The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C . G.) “8' §..... . §§SP0NDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ) 5 .. alGH COURT OF cHgATTlSGARH : BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. WRIT PETITION ....... WRIT PETITION _ UNDER ARTICLE ,__ 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA f Present: - Shri’Somkant Verma. counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vinod Tekam. Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents an advance copy. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 29'" July, 2010) The petitioner was initially appointed as Deputy Teacher in the year 1980 on a fixed pay of Rs.150/-. After compietion of his probation period, he was granted reguiar pay scale of Rs.169-300/-. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the issue invoived in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scaie with effect from the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. ‘ 3. The issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A.No.2745189 (Madhukant Yadu and 5B Others v. State ofMP. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon‘ble Supreme Court The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court uphoiding the decision of \ \ \ the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to \ regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment. i \ ' \\ \ ,,\ \ \ PETITIOMER Mohan La! Gendle RESPONDENTS Versus @ 4. In view of the above stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation, if so advised, to consider his case, if he stand on the same footings as per order dated 24-08-1992 passed by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A.No.2745 of 89 Madhukant Yadu (supra) and subsequently confirmed by order dated 03-014994 passed by the Hon‘ble Supreme Court in S.L.P.No.6892/1993 and grant relief accordingly. 5 g . No order as to costs. , ‘ M a L, a ' .