1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 1644 of 2010 Shaikh Sabir Shaikh Shabbir ..VERSUS.. State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O., P.S., Akot fail, Akola Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. R.D.Bhuibhar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. A.S.Parihar, A.P.P. for the respondent-State. CORAM : Prasanna B. Varale, J. DATED : 16 th Novem ber , 2010 . Heard. This is an application filed by the applicant for grant of regular bail in Crime No. 33/2010 for the offences punishable under Section 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 109, 120(b) of I.P.C., registered with Police Station, Akot Fail, Akola. Mr. Bhuibhar, learned Advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant is falsely implicated in the said offence and he is an innocent person. The applicant is involved in the offence only because of previous enmity. He, therefore, prayed for grant of bail to the applicant. Learned APP for the State has filed reply and opposed the application. Perused the reply and the record. Perusal of the record shows that there is strong prima facie material against the applicant. The statements recorded by the investigating agency reveal that the applicant had actively participated in the crime. One person namely Nisar Khan was seriously injured. Deadly weapon i.e. Iron pipe was used in the commission of offence. The statement of the victim was 2 recorded and in that statement, the victim specifically mentions the name of the applicant and the role played by him. It is submitted in the reply that the applicant is having criminal antecedents and three criminal cases are pending against him. Learned APP, therefore, prayed for rejection of the application. In view of above and the material available against the applicant, in my opinion, this is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant on bail. In the result, the application is rejected and disposed of as such. JUDGE Diwale