IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19568 Of 2010 1. SATTO PASWAN 2. PRABHU PASWAN 3. BHAVESH PASWAN 4. NAND KISHORE PASWAN 5. CHANDRA KISHORE PASWAN ----------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 8.7.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make correction in petitioners’ address. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application, as during the pendency of this application, petitioner no.4 and 5 have been arrested by the police. Accordingly, this application is permitted to be withdrawn as having become infructuous as against petitioner nos. 4 and 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Demand of Rangdari and firing is denied on the ground that there was no sign of firing and there is no delivery. Further submission is that name of grandfather of petitioner no.2 was recorded in the Khatian, to that effect they had a talk. Petitioners were in possession of the land as Bataidar. 2 Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner nos. 1,2 and 3 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in Sadar P.S. Case No. 31 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)