PETITIONERS 1 /’. Salim Thobhani, aged about 35 years, S/o Shri Shahabuddin Thobhani, Parnter M/s Thobhani Automobiles, Manendragarh,R/o IJZ, Farishta Apartments. Bvron Bazar, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) Manohar Lal Purohit, aged about 72 years, S/o Shri K. L. Purohit Manager, M/s Thobhani Auto— Mobiles, > Manendragarh, R/o Ward No. 1. Civil Lines. Manendragarh, Distt. Koriya (CG) Sanjeev Kumar ~Purohit, aged about 24 years, S/o Shri M . L. Purohit, Assistant Manager, M/s Thobhani Automobiles, Manendragarh, R/o Ward No.1, Civil Lines, Manendragarh, Distt. Koriya (Chhattisgarh) S. N. Jha, aged about 62 years, S/o Shri Jha, Owner, M/s Balaji Road Carriers,Tarbahar, Bilaspur Tahsil & District Bilaspur (CG) V ERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Food, Civil Supplies & Consumer Protection, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur. Collector (Food), District Koriya Chhattisgarh. Food Inspector, Manendragarh, District Koriya [Chhattisgarh] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATI'ISGARH) W. P. NOFFL3O OF 2004 ¥MRIT PETITION UNDER CON ARTIéLE ITU ON g27 OF B_§AD IN IA WITH FOR ISSUANQE OE WRI!‘ IN NATURE OF IT Q BLE QM‘ WRIT MANDAMUS PRQHIBITION E AND R DIRECTIONS; OTHER $ A ORDER OR A TICLE 26 OF THE ERTI OR WRITS. DIR CTION O ORDERS: @ _ XI—HC-22 Soma 24. 12.2004 On a mcnticn being made, the case is takcn up‘ for hearing. Shri Manindra Shrivastava 31m N.K. Agrawal, Depu réspondents. ' Heard both‘the counsd. counsel for the petitioners. y Advocate General for the State/ By this writ petition the petitioners have challenged the legality and propriety of the order dated 17.9.2004 passed by the appellate authority, the State Government, whereby the prayer for staying the effect and operation of the order passed by the Collector has been refusedt Learned c‘ounsel for the pet tioners submits that the appeal is. still pending and only the stay application has been rejected, ,in the circumstancesjf the appellate authority is directed to dispose of the appeal itself that will meet his requirement. To this submission, learned Deputy Advocate General has no objection.’ Having heard learned coun tel for the parties and having regard to case, theappellate authority i.e. the State Government is directed t dispose of the appeal asrearly as possible, but not later than first eek of February, 2005. With the above direction, t e petition stands disposed of. ‘“ ‘ in View of this order, M.(W. P.No.4605/2004 also stands disposed of! the facts and circumstances of t i Parties are entitled for certi ied copy of this order. V/ /V/x ’