BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.15828 of 2011 1. S. JEYAMANIRAJ 2. N. ANNAMALAI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 & 5 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, COMMERCIAL CRIME INVESTIGATION WING, STATE BANK COLONY, ETTAIYAPURAM ROAD, TUTICORIN, CRIME NO.4/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. J.JEYAKUMARAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, Additional Public Prosecutor ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 408, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477(A) r/w 120(b) and 34 of I.P.C in Crime No.4/2011 and seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been arrayed as A-1 and A-5 out of fifty one accused. He further submitted that the first petitioner is the Secretary of Tuticorin Housing Board Society and he has been implicated in this case on the allegation of misappropriation of Rs.59,000/- and as far as the second petitioner is concerned, he is the Sub-Registrar of the said Society. He further submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners are the Secretary and Sub-Registrar of Tuticorin Housing Board Society and they have been implicated in this case on the allegation of misappropriation of Rs.59,000/-. He further submitted that the investigation is pending. 4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. The fact remains that the first petitioner has been implicated in this case on the allegation as stated above. As far as the second petitioner is concerned, there is no specific allegation levelled against him. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tirunelveli, on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police for a period of four weeks daily at 5.30 p.m. and thereafter they shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 19/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, TIRUNELVELI. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, COMMERCIAL CRIME INVESTIGATION WING, STATE BANK COLONY, ETTAIYAPURAM ROAD, TUTICORIN. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. J.JEYAKUMARAN Advocate SR.No.44748 SR : 21.12.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15828 of 2011 Date :19/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/