IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.26339 of 2008 Between: Menta Mastan Rao ..... Petitioner AND The Municipal Corporation of Vijayawada, rep. by its Commissioner, Vijayawada. .....Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Y.Srinivasan for Mrs.M.S.Tirumala Rani Counsel for the Respondent: Smt.G.Jhansi, SC for MCV The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent in not allowing the petitiner to proceed with the construction of the building at Door No.71-2-29 in R.S.Nos.102/1 AND 102/2 OF Patamata, Vijayawada in accordance with the building permission in Ref.No.54/2006-G7- BA.No.01688/2006, dated 12-09-2006, without any manner of right or authority as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently, direct the respondent not to interfere with the construction of the building at D.No.71-2-29 in R.S.No.102/1 and 102/2 of Patamata, Vijayawada, Krishna District.” At the hearing, Sri Y.Srinivasan, learned Counsel representing Sri M.S.Tirumala Rani, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause of the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.34487 of 2008, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 23rd June, 2011 lur