IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.718 of 2008 RAMASHRAY PRASAD SINGH @ RAMASHRAY SINGH, SON OF LATE RAMRUP CHAUDHARY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHATRA, P.S. KUCHHILA, DISTRICT KAIMUR. ---- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. GAYASUDDIN, SON OF NOT KNOWN, ASSISTANT ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, ELECTRICITY SUPPLY SUB-DIVISION, RAMGARH, DISTRICT KAIMUR. ---- OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 5 9.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner is accused in a case under the Electricity Act. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 6.10.2007, by which the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance after differing with the final form submitted by the police authority in this case. There is no illegality in the order. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be granted liberty to raise all these points at proper stage of the case. It goes without saying that the petitioner can file an application under Sections 228 or 239 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This application is dismissed. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)