1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1279/1999 The State of Maharashtra and another ..versus.. Ku.Baby D/o Vithoba Katkar and others. Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order C ORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 23rd JULY, 2010. P.C. Heard learned A.G.P. Shri Sonak and Shri Samarth, learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3. Counsel for respondent No.1 absent. The learned Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Nagpur in Appeal No.STN/11/1991 dated 20/11/1998 directed in paragraph-4 as under- “4. It is hereby recommended to the Education Officer that the amount equal to the arrears of emoluments to be paid to the appellant by him personally till she resumes her duty, within 60 days or in alternative approval of the said period be granted and complied with accordingly.” The controversy revolves whether the directions for payment of back wages would be shouldered by the Education Officer personally. With all said and done, the responsibility could not be shouldered by the 2 Education Officer personally. However, since he was a responsible officer, it will be the employer of such Education Officer (Government) who would ultimately make the arrears payable to the respondent No.1. The operative part of paragraph 4 referred above in the order dated 20th November, 1998 needs to be read in the above context. No other controversy could be seen to be agitating between the parties. Rule made absolute to the extent as above. (K.U.Chandiwal) JUDGE. Khunte