IN THE HIGH COURT OF (CHHATTISGARH) AT BILASPUR M.A. J Noff/2005. 52,. y g Seth Nand !al Rathi, S/o. W 'fi‘ethamm ji Rathi, Sukama; § APPELLANT NON—APPUCANT Tahsil Sukama, Disth. Dantewada (C.G.). VERSUS 1;) Salik Ram Yadav, S/o. Bisauha ' Ram, aged 52 years, Smt. Dhanmat Bai Wlo. Sankram Yadav, aged 48 years, y/ Anil Kumar Yadav, S/o. Late Balaram Yadav, aged 12 years, Ku. Padmani Yadav, D/o. Late Balarama Yadav, aged 10 years. RESPONDENTS ‘; AV Respondent no. 3 & 4 Miner through guardian Grand Father Salikram, All R/o. ViHage Charmudiya, Tahsil Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) (Respondent no.1 to 4 Claimant) 5)/ Devanand Yadav, S/o. Pancham‘ / Yadav, aged 23 years, R/o. Rajapara Kanker‘, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) at present Taj Auto Deai, Anjuman Complex Main Road Kanker (C.G.) (Driver) 6,) Abdui Kadar, S/o. Late Abdul g” Karim, aged 32 years, R/o. Main Road Kanker, Distt. Kanker (Q.G.) (Owner of vehicle) / MEMO OF APPEAL ‘U/S’ 173 OF THE MOTORrVE‘HICLE ACT Claim before claim tribunal 1) Rs. 17,08000/— W 2) Claim Awar‘ded by the tribunal Rs.1,65,000/— / y “ @250 amm (W) W .m£%&~ §§%i§§l WWW mmm mmm mmawm iwaifcmanéw ‘ $3: Hon’ble Shri Prashant Ku i 07.12.2010 mar Mishra, J. Shi‘i Subhash Yadav, coumel for the appellant. Learned counsel for the a > pellant prays for time to deposit the “award amount in compliance of roviso t0 section 173 of the Motor ‘ ‘i/e‘hicles Act, This appeal is pen ing since May, 2005, therefore, this ‘l court is not inclined to grant any urther time to deposit the amount. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for non—compliance of proviso to section 173 ofthe Mo or Vehicles Act. The appellant shall be at iberty to file the appeal afresh after depositing the amount as requi d under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act. No. 752/2005 is also dismissed. 1n View ofthe above, MC Sdl- Prashant Kumar Misra Judge FS/l 47—2/201 0 —1 ,00,000. Zé h