. IN THE HIG F Au xnxb AuAL ( UND ITS RIT PETI'rmN IGINL EXTRA No. ORDINAéY J 3 (0S JURIsDICTION r 1997. %; l. SHRI NARAYN JAISWAL A S/O. LATE SHRI SHAMBHU RATAN JAISWAL CHTAN CHOUCK PO. PENDR DISTT. BISPUR (MP) PROPRIETOR OF DINESH SAW MILL. 2. DESH KUMAR JAIswAL IN s/o. SHRI NARAYAN JAISWAL CHETAN CHOCK U P.o. pENDRA DISTT. BIASLPUR (MP) VERSUS PETITGERS IN STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH COLLECTOR, BILASPUR LASPUR (M.P. 2. MR. D. MANDAVI BI ) SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE PENDRA ROAD (GOURELA) DTT. BILASPU (MP) RESPODENTS N PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 F CN wmwm >7 I » Jan a mr EE;‘ [\IBH‘ wrw m t a a n H COURT'o Mhxa kan aw‘uyux; ER W ORA o IN THE MATTER OF E . A LA xS R O THE OSTTTUTION OFINDIA. to? HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 1365 of 1997 PETITIONERS : ShriNarayan Jaiswal & Others. ’ VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Madhya Pradesh & Another. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. I Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent N0. 1. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 03r day of December, 2010) The matter is called for hearing. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioners. The petitioners may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In View of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. Judge / saashx, sal—W‘w‘ ‘V Present: None for the petitioners.