1 CAG-5543.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5543 OF 2010 Aslam Sorathia & Anr. .... Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Shri Shirish Gupte, Senior Counsel i/b Ms Racheeta Dhuru for the Applicants. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5544 OF 2010 Javed Rafik Ansari .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent S/Shri A.P. Mundargi, Senior Counsel with H. Mundargi for the Applicant. AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5549 OF 2010 Ashish Chandel .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent S/Shri Prakash Naik i/b J.B. Choudhary for the Applicant. Ms S.D. Shinde, APP, for the State in all applications. 2 CAG-5543.10 CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: FEBRUARY 08, 2011 P.C: 1. These three applications for anticipatory bail are filed in cross complaints upon which two FIRs bearing Nos.511 and 514 of 2010 have been registered. The first informants as well as the accused in the two cases seem to have settled the matter amicably except for one Ravi Premsingh Bidlan and Sachin Jayanti Solanki who are accused in the report of Frankie in C.R. No.514/2010. They have filed intervention applications. Accused Frankie Anthony Fernandes has filed an application for quashing FIR No.511 of 2010 and the further proceedings. In one case it is stated that there is only a firing in the air and not aimed at anyone which did not result in any injury. In the other case Javed Ansari was injured by a knife on his left buttock and has been discharged from the hospital. The learned counsel for the accused in the case registered on Javed Ansari's report states that this injury cannot qualify with one for making out an offence punishable under Section 307 of the 3 CAG-5543.10 IPC and that at the worst it would be one under Section 324 of the IPC. Considering the fact that the victim in one case and the first informant in both the cases want to have the matter amicably settled, the applications for anticipatory bail are allowed. The common order passed on the present applications on 20-12-2010 is confirmed. 2. This order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge-sheeted, the applicants may furnish fresh bond before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court, dated 2-12-2010, delivered in Criminal Appeal No.2271 of 2010, arising out of SLP (Cri.) No. 7615 of 2009 {Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.}. 3. The applications accordingly stand disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)