1 CAW555.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION KJ CIVIL APPLICATION NO.555 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5396 OF 2010 Bagul Kishor Madhavrao )..Applicant Vs. The Chairman/Secretary, Nashik Dist. Maratha) Vidya Prasarak Samaj & Ors. )..Respondents ---- Mr. Mandar Limaye & Mahendra Agavekar for the applicant. Mrs.Molina Thakur AGP for respondent nos.2 to 4. ---- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ DATE : 15/3/2011. PC 1 Heard Counsel for the parties. 2 This application is resisted by the respondent nos.2 to 4. We are in agreement with the submission of the respondent nos.2 to 4 that the explanation offered by the applicant is not a sufficient cause. Even then, we think it appropriate to allow this application 2 CAW555.11.sxw in terms of prayer clauses-(a) and (a-1) on condition that the Advocate on record for the applicant shall personally pay cost quantified at Rs.2000/- to High Court Legal Services authority within a period of one week from today. This indulgence is shown as the litigant should not suffer for the mistake of the Advocate. Application allowed in the above terms. If cost is not paid in time, the earlier order dated 11.10.2010 shall stand revived. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)