IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.41 of 2009 JANG BAHADUR YADAV SON OF SRI DUKHAN YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAULA, POLICE STATION NAUHATTA (O.P. DARHAR), DISTRICT SAHARSA ………..……PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. POLICE I.G., DARBHANGA RANGE, DARBHANGA 3. POLICE D.I.G. KOSHI RANGE, SAHARSA 4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SAHARSA 5. DY.S.P. SADAR, SAHARSA 6. SHRI N.K.PATHAK, INVESTIGATING OFFICER, DARHAR, O.P.INCHARGE, POLICE STATION NAUHATTA, DISTRICT SAHARSA ……RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 10.02.2009 It is the assertion of the petitioner that Nauhatta P.S.case No.57 of 2008 is not being properly investigated. Having heard Mr. Y.C.Verma for the petitioner, A.C. to S.C.VII for the State and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the petitioner shall be well advised to represent before respondent no.4, Superintendent of Police, Saharsa for the redressal of his grievance. Needless to state that in case such an application is filed, respondent no.4 shall take appropriate action in accordance with law. It is made clear that I have not expressed any opinion in regard to the claim made by the petitioner and that shall be considered by respondent no.4 in accordance with law. Application stands disposed off with the observation aforesaid. Narendra/ (Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, ACJ.)