1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7319 OF 2006 Raghunath Mahadu Bhalekar & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Secretary to the Govt. of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents. Mr. N.V. Vechalekar i/by M/s. N.V. Vechalekar & Co. for the Petitioners Mr. S.R. Nargolkar, Assistant Government Pleader, for Respondent No.1 Mr. D.R. More for Respondent No. 2. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and S.A. BOBDE, JJ. DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 2008 P.C.:- The petitioners' grievance is that the road-widening is being done in such a way that houses of residents of a village get demolished. Therefore, the respondents should be asked to have new alignment of the road. 2. The learned counsel for the Municipal Corporation submits that after it was discovered that the alignment would involve demolition of houses, they modified the alignment and submitted the Draft 2 Development Plan along with the Modified Plan to the Government, which is awaiting sanction. As such, we do not find that the petitioners have any grievance at present. The petition is accordingly disposed of. 3. It is clarified, with respect to Gat No.170, that the respondents shall not use the land for the purpose of road-widening till the Modified Plan is sanctioned by the Government, as we are told that the Modified Plan is under consideration of the Government. The State shall consider the request for modification of the plan within a period of three months and pass appropriate orders. BILAL NAZKI, J. S.A. BOBDE, J.