g Ilnm ‘n‘KBn uuUR‘i' G‘F CHHATTI3GARI-i, BILA$?UR wmc) Mama/261 1 Dr. Ku. Nupur, D/o (~3h‘ri Raj. Rehan Kumar, aged about 27 years, Riy Qrt. No.1120-B, New construction Colony, Bilaspur (0G) 495 004 WETiTiONER VEE€$US ‘. State of Chhattisg’arh, Through : Secretary Public Health Famih; Weifare and Medicai Educatiom Departmem’ DKS Sham/aim Mantralaya! Raipur (CG) 2. The Dean, Pi. J.N.M. N’edicai Couege, RaipurmG.) Director, Medica§ Education State of Chhattéogarh, Raipur (CG) 4‘ The Chief Manager, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Biiaspur Branch, Bibspur (GAG) WW?“ PE?mGN imitWR i-‘aRTmLE 326 OF THE CfJNSTiTUTEON OF ENQHA Mmeamnce: RE$ F BENT U) 12C) 0) Mrs. Neushine Aii, Advocate for the peritioner. Mr. Shas.ank Thakur, Pane! Lawyer for the 8tate. GRAL OREER §23;03:201 1) $UN§L KUMAR SwiNHiiw. Heard finaiiy with the conserrt of ieamed eouneei for the pames Mrs. Neuehma Ari, iearned counsei appearing on behah‘ of the peiiiioner, eu‘omite that the petitioner appeared in the pre—medicei reet (PM?) in t’ne year 2002‘ After seieoiion, ehe was given admieeion in MBBS Course in reepondent Nor 2— Coiiege. 3’ne was directed to furnish bank guarantee of Rs.75,GOO/-. She furniehed the bank guarahtee on 16.16.2606. The period of hank guarantee wae up to 31.03.2010. The reaeon for directing to furnieh bank guarantee wae that after obtaining the ix/iEiB8 Eegree, she wiii eer‘v’e in the rurai areas of Chhattiegarh State. 1U- a L W.P.(C) No.1243/2611 Afier completion of the MBBS course, the name 0f the petiiioner was sent far givmg appointment but the concerned respondents dio‘ not issue appoimment ietters in favour of ins petitioner and a long time eiapseo‘. Thereafter, ihe bank guarantee was encashed by respondent No. 2 on 30.42070 and presentty, the amount in question is pending with respondent No.2. Mrs. Nauehina Aii submits that in simiier writ petitions Le. W.P.(C) No. 2731/2007’, W.P.(C) No. 1986/2010, & W.P.(C) No.105/2011, orders have been passed that the petitioners are entitied to principie amount as aiso interest @ 6% per annum subject to verification of facts. She s that the preeent Witt petition may aiso be disposed of in terms of he orders passed in above 3 writ petitions. Mr. Si‘rashank Thakur, teamed Panet Lawyer appearing on behait of the $tate, tairty agrees that the issues invoiVeo in this writ petition is covered by the 3 orders passed ‘oy this Court in the above 3 writ petitions l t! i ruorn re— ‘ sax Cry _-l and the present writ petition can be disposed of in terms or me orders passed in the said writ petitions, in View of the above agreed submissions made by iearneo‘ oounsei for the parties, this writ petition is tinaii‘y disposed of in terms of the orders passed in WPtC) No.273t/2GG7 on 04.032009, W.P.(C) Not 986/2C‘i10 on Oi .G7’20tt) & W.P.(C) No.1D5/20tt on 15.02.20‘: 1. No order as to oost(s). shyna §