HEGH COURT OE CATTISARH AT BILASPU Wm Pamm Na. 5044 af 2005 Pefi'rioner 5hyomlu! Ran Sla 5hr! KunJ RnmJi Rae Aged about 65 yaars Rio 6mm Posh? Nandmnkaian Shakfi Dist Jajnjgir Champa, ChhaWsgarh. Re$panden+s 1. SW12 ‘af Chha'H’isgarh, Thmug Accoummf 6enera! Accuum's Pension and Treasuries DJLS. Bhavnn' Mammiay Rmpur Versus rummA k‘r *v :1” mwkwnx'nn , r# aw A 2. Sfafe of Chhafhsgnrh Through secre'tmy, Depnrfmi' of Educa-hnn DJCS. Bhavan, Mammlay, Raipur. 3. Joim Direchr, Treasuries Accounfs é. Pension. Bilaspur. 4. PrincmL Gavemmenf High Secondary School, Khuim, Dist. JaJnJgir Champn im? 5 nM 2 ’4W’Eh’5i‘ ‘ ~ £53 5. Dusmm Educunon Officer, Dist. Japjgw Champn, d1hu‘H'tsgurh. bismct Treasury Officzr, bist. Jnjnjgir Champs), Chhoffi5gorh. WRIT PETITOIN UEDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CO§TITUTIOg 9F INDIA Singw Bahch : Han'bla Mr. Safish K. Agniho'rri. J 5hri Sanjuy Agarvml, Advnm'rz for 1112 pefi‘ti'amr. 5N4 P. K. Bhaduri, Panel [nwyzr for fha respondan'rs. - om. ORDER (mm on his 24*“ day of My, 2008) , 1. Wi‘ih +ha mixszm' of ‘l'he pmfie§ ‘rhe ma‘H’zr is mken up for final hearing 2. This ma'Har parfams +0 ra‘hra‘ dues Tins Court m ihe ma'h'er af Wrrt Pa'h'han Na 4642/2004 (Bauna‘fh Rhonda! Vs The $1'n1'a of Chhn‘rfisgurh & a'thers) and Mhar connected markers, decided on 31 1 2008 directed he Commi‘rfee +0 eonsider ‘me ma++er of retire! \ W6 R h u. why «z § \ e t wM dues as fhe' dispufed ques'tiaw 0f fad-s were involved. The Cummi++az was consfim-fed by 'Hae '51'u1’2 éavemman'l', pursuan+ fa fhe order da‘fed 19.642006 passed in WPNa. 1961/2006 (5min Keja Bai Chmdmkar Vs. 5+a12 Eavernmen‘r and afhers) and order da‘re‘d 13.3.2008 passed in M.C.C. Na. 105f2008 (Stain nf Chha‘rfisgarh and afhers Vs. Baijnm'h Manda! and unmher). Thus’ fhis pefH'ion is squareiy covered by fhe judgmenf and order da‘red 31" of January, ' 7,3 2008 passed in WP. Na. 4642/2004 {Baijnmh Manda! Vs. The 5mm §f Chhafrisgnrh &‘ Mhers) and o‘fher cannacfed maf‘l'ers, as submi‘rfed by learned cnunsel appearing for fhe pnr'rias. 3.’ Wi'rh +ha consan't of fhe parfias, +his petifion is accordingly sisposed of in +312 same +erms 3.24 fhe office of 1+:e Advoca're éenem! is dime-red fa send +312 case +a fhe CommH-hae, wifhin a periad of 15 days fram 'rhe da-I'e nf receip‘l' of a copy sf fhe pe‘rifion fram fhe pe‘l'Hianer dang with a capy cf 'rhis arder. Wereaf-ter, 'the Cammi'rree ska“ issue rmfice ta ‘H'ie pefi'l'ianer and fhe afficer-s cancemed, wi‘fhin a fur‘lher period of 15 days. The Commi'H'ee shall consider and pass order, in accordance wi'rh law, offer affording proper oppor‘luniiy of hearing ‘io 1'he pe‘l'i‘l‘ioner. The pe'ri'rioner and +l1e officer concemed may file additional documems, if necessary. The entire exercise, including paymenf of' refiroi dues, if any, +0 fhe pei'i'l'ioner- be completed wifhin a period of four mon‘rhs from fhe dafe of reoeipf of 'Hae file from +l1e office of 'ihe Advooafe General. 4. The pe‘l’ifioner §1all supply ex‘l‘m copy of The pefifion along with 'a copy of 'Hiis order :io learned counsel appearing for fhe respondenfs, for sending fo fhe said commit-tee. 5. Consequenfly, ‘l'he MM? No. 4077 of 2005 sfonds disposed of. .\\ Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge WWAWK m» s m‘vwm 355 n: v r : ~ ”