IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 17TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 2811 of 2008(I) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ ANEESA,W/O.NAZEER,KAVINTE PADEETTATHIL KANNAMPALLI BHAGOM, KAYAMKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.K.JAGADEESH SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE KAYAMKULAM MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,MUNICIPAL OFFICE KAYAMKULAM. 2. THE KAYAMKULAM MUNICIPAL COUNCIL REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, KAYAMKULAM MUNICIPALITY, KAYAMKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.RAYA SHENOY,SC,KAYAMKULAM MUNICIPALITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(c).No.2811 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 6th day of February, 2008 JUDGMENT Sri.Raya Shenoy, learned standing counsel for the Municipality submits that he has been instructed to submit that the appeal preferred by the petitioner has been rejected by the Municipal Council. Considering prayer No.2 in the writ petition, I dispose of the writ petition directing the second respondent- Municipal Council to communicate to the petitioner the result of Ext.P8 appeal immediately and at any rate within seven days of petitioner making available a copy of this judgment. Once the copy of the order on the appeal is received, it is open to the petitioner to have statutory and other remedies available to him under law. Considering the above direction, there will be a further direction that the Municipality will not demolish the construction put up by the petitioner for a period of one month from today. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE sv.