IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 425 OF 2007 NARULA UDYOG (INDIA) PVT. LTD. REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR SHRI. S. K. NARULA AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. M.S. Usgaonkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sudesh Usgaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S.S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mrs. L. Dharwadkar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for Respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. S.G. Dessai, Senior Advocate with Ms. P. Talaulikar, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Mr. M.S. Joshi, Advocate for Respondent No.4. Coram:- D. B. BHOSALE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 22nd January, 2008 P.C.: Learned Advocate general, on instructions, makes a statement that Government has decided to go for re-tendering process by cancelling the tender in question. In view of the statement made by learned Advocate General, in our opinion, nothing survives in this Writ Petition. Mr. Usgaonkar, learned Senior Counsel, however, submits that a liberty may be given to the Petitioners to challenge the decision of Government to cancel the tender process and to go for re-tendering. We do not find any reason to refuse such liberty. In the circumstances, this Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous, with liberty to the Petitioners as prayed. While granting the liberty we shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on the right of the Petitioners to challenge the aforesaid decision of the Government. Interim relief, if any, to stand vacated. D. B. BHOSALE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH