1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application (C) No. 13 of 2009 IN Civil Revision Application (St.) No. 19769 of 2008 (Badrilal Shankarlal Akole ..vs.. Lalchand Shankarlal Akole and another) =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==- Mr. J.B.Kasat, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. V.M.Deshpande, Advocate for the non-applicant no.1 None for non-applicant no.2 C ORAM : Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota, J. DATED : 20th January, 2010. This Civil Application is taken out for condonation of delay of 12 days in filing the Civil Revision Application. A copy of the application is served upon respondents and they oppose the application. At para 2 of the application, the applicant states that he was under bona fide belief that period of limitation for filing the Revision Application would expire on 14th December, 2008. He claims to be a cultivator and not well versed in law. He also makes out ground of health stating that he is paralysed and unable to walk properly. 2 Considering the nature of ground set out in the Civil Application, in my opinion, the same is satisfactory. Hence, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A). Office to register the Civil Revision Application and place the same for admission on 8th February, 2010. Civil Application is disposed of. JUDGE. Diwale