IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST JANUARY 2007 / 11TH MAGHA 1928 WP(C).No. 278 of 2007(G) ------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------ K.V. PREMKUMAR, AGED 44, S/O.LATE V. RAMAN, KALARIVATHUKKAL, VALAPATTANAM P.O., KANNUR-670 010. BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE SRI.A.V.JOJO RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DAMODHARAN (PRESENT) ASST.COMMISSIONER HINDU RELGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT THIRUVANGAD SRI.RAMASWAMI TEMPLE, THALASSERY. 3. M.P. KRISHNAN, NOW WORIING AS MANAGER, PERALASSERY SUBRAMANYA SWAMI TEMPLE, KANNUR DISTRICT. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.278 OF 2007 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of January, 2007 JUDGMENT The petitioner applied to the third respondent for certain information. He had to move the first respondent since the third respondent did not give such information. In spite of the direction of the first respondent, it is the allegation of the petitioner, that the third respondent did not give the information. Accordingly, the petitioner is stated to have moved the first respondent making a complaint against the third respondent for disobedience. That is a matter that will obviously gain the attention of the first respondent. No writ needs to be issued for such a purpose. Hence reserving the right of the petitioner to move this Court for expediting any action, this writ petition is closed. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN Judge kkb.