1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 136/07 IN S.B.CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 594/07 (Kailash Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 13/7/2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Talat Bari for the petitioner-applicant. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the judgment and order impugned as also the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that criminal revision filed by co-accused Hema Ram @ Hem Raj against the very judgment and order impugned being S.B.Cr. Revision Petition No. 573/07 has been admitted by Vacation Judge on 28.6.2007 and the sentence has been suspended. In this view of the matter, this revision has to be admitted. Admit. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public prosecutor accepts the notice for the State. Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application for suspension of sentence. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that sentence awarded to the similarly situated co-accused has already been suspended by order dated 28.6.2007, I think it just and proper to suspend the substantive sentence of imprisonment awarded to the accused petitioner- applicant. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 397/401 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the substantive sentence of imprisonment passed by the trial court and affirmed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Deedwana vide judgment dt. 18.6.2007 in Criminal Appeal No. 14/05 against 2 applicant Kailash S/o Lalaram shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid revision provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before this court on 9.8.2007 and whenever ordered to do so with the incorporation in the bond that as and when he will shift his place of residence, he will intimate to this Court and his lawyer about his new place of residence. (H.R.PANWAR),J. rp