1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRI.APPLN.NO. 3249 OF 2008. (SONU @ DINESH SHOBHELAL MESHRAM v. STATE OF MAH.) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Shri R.M.Daga, Advocate for Applicant. Shri A.D. Sonak, A.P.P. for respondent. CORAM : R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 29, 2008. 1. This is an application for bail by a person who is alleged to have murdered one Suresh and caused evidence to disappear. 2. Chargesheet has been filed. 3. I have gone through the application as well as reply by Additional Public Prosecutor as also the entire record of investigation. 4. The prosecution case seems to be that the accused had demanded return of his mobile phone from the deceased, 2 the deceased refused. This led to altercations in which the accused hit the deceased with bamboo stick leading to death of the deceased. There are no eyewitnesses. The case rests on circumstances of the seizure of the sticks at the instance of the accused on which no blood stains have been found by the Laboratory. Other piece of evidence, recovery of mobile phone, which according to the prosecution, belong to accused, at the instance of accused from one Mohammed Imran. 5. Considering this nature of the allegations and the evidence it is unlikely that the applicant's being at large will prejudice the trial. The application is, therefore, allowed. 6. The applicant be released on P.R. of Rs.Twenty Five Thousand with one or more solvent sureties in aggregate sum of Rs.Twenty Five Thousand. 4. Bail before the Court of Session. JUDGE RR