IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39561 of 2009 WITH Cr.Misc. No. 39562 of 2009 HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD.THRU SIDDHARTHA GUPTA, 9 SHAKESPEARE SARANI, PS SHAKESPEARE SARANI, KOLKATA – PETITIONER IN BOTH THE CASES. Versus STATE OF BIHAR. … For the petitioner : Mr.N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate, Mr. J.R. Choudhary and Mr.D.N. Tiwari, Advocates in both the cases. For the S t a t e : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, A. P. P. … 5. 19.1.2010 These applications have been filed for quashing the order, dated 29.10.2007 passed by the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Tr. No. 1393A/2008, arising out of GO 19/2007 and the order, dated 28.2.2007 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas in Tr. No. 2742/2007, arising out of Official Case N o. 27/2007 whereby cognizance have been taken for the offences under section 16(a) (1) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. The prosecution report indicates that the LOGO was not placed at the correct place and as such the petitioner has been booked under section 16(a) (1) of the aforesaid Act. This court in the case of Prem Kumar Agrawal & Another vs. The State of Bihar (Cr. Misc. No. 7197 of 2008, disposed of on 24.7.2008 and in the case of Vinita Bali vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2008 (4) PLJR 135 has held that the wrong placement of LOGO does not, in any manner, constitute an offence under section 16(a) (1) of the Act and has quashed the order of cognizance. These cases are squarely covered by the aforesaid two orders of this court. Accordingly, the orders taking cognizance, dated 2 29.10.2007 and 28.2.2007 are hereby quashed. These applications are allowed. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)