IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 9289 of 2008 Decided on: 10.3.2011 Sunder Singh …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. Rama Kant Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Rama Kant Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not press the present petition in view of the contents of the reply, filed by the respondents. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed having been not pressed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge March 10, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?