IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.95 of 2010 Raghunandan Yadav, son of Jagati Yadav, R/O village Mahua, P.S. Nirmali, District- Supaul ………… Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar ………… Opp.Party ----------- 3. 26/02/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case is under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It is stated that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and he has been apprehended only on the basis of secret information received by the police. It is submitted that even after his arrest, there has been no recovery from his house and he was not put on T.I.Parade. It is submitted that petitioner has only one criminal antecedent, as stated in paragraph 7 of the application, in which he has been allowed bail by this Court. It is said that petitioner is in custody since 13.7.2009. Considering the above submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, this application is allowed. Let petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the - 2 - satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate (Rail), Samastipur in Darbhanga G.R.P.S.Case No.35 of 2009 with conditions as laid down in Sub-Section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh, J.)