CRP 27/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.NK SINGH Heard Mr. DK Das, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner This Revision is directed against the order of the learned Dist rict Judge dated 13.10.2010 passed in Misc.(J) Case No. 89 of 2007 (Ref. T.S.(D) No.06/07) directing the present petitioner(husband) to pay a sum of Rs.2,000/-p er month as monthly maintenance to the respondent(wife) w.e.f. the date of the p etition, i.e. 18.5.07 and a sum of Rs.4000/- as litigation expenses. On hearing submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, it appears that the present petition is filed assailing the impugned order date d 13.10.10 only on the main ground that the learned District Judge has not corre ctly appreciated the documents filed by the petitioner (husband) showing the mon thly total emoluments of the petitioner for working as an employee in the privat e farm. Therefore, it is clear that in the present Revision petition there is no whisper that the learned District Judge has no power and jurisdiction to pass t he impugned order dated 13.10.2010. It is fairly settled that revision petition filed against the or der of the court below can be entertained by this Court in case no appeal lies a nd also there are materials for interference of the order passed by the Court be low more fully mentioned and provided in Section 115 of the CPC. It appears that there is no inherent irregularity in passing the impugned order dated 13.10.10. Accordingly, this revision petition is devoid of merit and same is dismissed. However, in the peculiar circumstances of the case the learned District Judge is directed to dispose of the main Title Suit No.06 of 2007 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this judgment and order. Petitioner is directed to approach the learned District Judge wi th certified copy of this judgment and order for necessary action.