[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.3132 OF 2008 Mr.Manohar Jaya Shetty ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.J.S.Kini Advocate Mr.Suresh Dubey Adv. for Applicant Mr.S.S.Pednekar APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 18, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 18, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 18, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in MECR No. 50 of 2008 of Shivaji Park Police Station, Mumbai. The complaint has been lodged by mother of the applicant against him. It is a family dispute. 3. The learned APP states that the investigation is going on and when the custody of the applicant is felt necessary, the applicant would be given 72 [-2-] hours notice in writing prior to his arrest. In view of the above statement, this application is disposed of. It is made clear that if such a notice is received, the applicant shall prefer the necessary application for anticipatory bail before the concerned Sessions Court. 4. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]