IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 8TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 17TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 14379 of 2010(V) ---------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. SUDHEERAN P.K., PREVENTIVE OFFICER, EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, WADAKKANCHERY. 2. RAJEEV V.R., PREVENTIVE OFFICER, EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, CHAVAKKAD. 3. SUNIL K.B., PREVENTIVE OFFICER, EXCISE CIRCLE OFFICE, THRISSUR. 4. MATHEW K.D., PREVENTIVE OFFICER, EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, CHALAKUDY. 5. PRAVEENKUMAR A.P., PREVENTIVE OFFICER, EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, WADAKKANCHERRY. BY ADV. SMT.I.SHEELA DEVI RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF TAXES, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, THRISSUR. ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS,SC,KPSC FOR R2 SRI. ANTONY MUKKATH - GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R1,3,4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 14379 of 2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: COPY OF JUDGMENT IN W.A.NO.1085/2000 DATED 14.6.2000 OF THE DIVISION BENCH. EXT.P2: COPY OF W.A.NO.1815/2000 DATED 16.10.2000. EXT.P3: COPY OF ORDER IN R.P.NO.590/2000 DATED 18.12.2000 EXT.P4: COPY OF ORDER IN GO (MS) NO.155/2003/TD DATED 14.10.2003. EXT.P5: COPY OF ORDER IN GO (Rt) NO.223/06/TD DATED 4.4.2006 OF THE GVOVERNMENT OF KERALA. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.13177 OF 2006 – R DATED 28.2.2007. EXT.P7: COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION IN CATEGORY NO.111/2007 DATED 28.3.2007. EXT.P8: COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION AMENDING SPECIAL RULES DATED 4.6.2008. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ----------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.14379 OF 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of November, 2010 JUDGMENT It is admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that as contended by the learned Government Pleader, the issue involved in this writ petition is covered against the petitioner in W.P.(C)No.6036/2010, judgment in which has been confirmed in W.A.No.1579/2010. In the above circumstances, following those judgments, this writ petition is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd