IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-28567 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 5.11.2009 Balviro Bai @ Balvir Kaur .. Petitioner v. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. L. S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. .. Rajesh Bindal J. On 13.10.2009, following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner were recorded: “ Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was neither named in the FIR nor at the time of presentation of challan she was put in column No. 2. It is only during the course of evidence that the prosecution filed an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. and the petitioner has been summoned to face trial.” Today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in terms of the order passed, the petitioner has already put in appearance before the court below and submitted her bail bonds. It is a case where there was substantial improvement in the statement of the prosecutrix as was recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. and what was recorded in the court. Still, as the petitioner has been summoned in an application filed by the prosecution under Section 319 Cr.P.C., she will face trial. The other accused specifically named in the FIR are already in custody. Considering the aforesaid facts, the interim order passed by this Court on 13.10.2009 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 5.11.2009 mk