IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10197 of 2010 SHEO NANDAN GUPTA SON OF LATE DWARIKA PRASAD GUPTA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHEWARA P.S. CHEWARA, DISTRICT – SHEIKHPURA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. CHIEF ENGINEER NALKUP DIVISION, MUNGER. 3. SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, NALKUP DIVISION, MUNGER. 4. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER TUBEWELL DIVISION MUNGER. 5. SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER TUBEWELL SUBDIVISION SHEIKHPURA (MUNGER). 6. DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER SHEIKHPURA CUM MUNGER. 7. DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER SHEIKHPURA. 8. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. ----------- 02. 05.07.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st of December 2008 from the post of Tubewell Operator while working under the respondent no. 5, the pensionary benefits of the petitioner have not been fixed correctly. It is submitted that though the date of appointment is 01.01.1980 as would be appearing from the extract of the service book as contained in Annexure- 2 as also the order granting first time bound promotion on completion of 10 years of service with effect from 2 01.01.1980 as contained in Annexure- 2 series. It is further submitted that besides the above, petitioner is entitled to revision of pensionary benefits on account of implementation of the sixth pay revision including the claim of G.P.F. which has not been paid for the period February 1988 to February 1990. It is further submitted that the claim on account of ACP was also not considered though he was entitled for the same. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 4 with a copy to respondent nos. 5, 6 and 8. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the 3 grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)