IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2008 / 14TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 7512 of 2008(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ REGHUPATHY,S/O.RAJAGOPAL TC 3/1979,SIVAMANGALAM LANE, PATTOM P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.SUDHEER RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE KERALA WATER AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER P.H.CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER P.H.DIVISION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER KERALA WATER AUTHORITY W.W.SECTION NO.VI THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 BY SC SMT. S. AMBIKA DEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 7512 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: MARCH 4, 2008 JUDGMENT In regard to a water connection to a residential building, there is an allegation that the supply was used for non-domestic purposes and demand notice has been issued on that basis. In this writ petition, the petitioner has produced Ext.P3, the demand notice, on receipt of which petitioner filed Ext.P4 requesting the 2nd respondent to recall Ext.P3. It is stated that thereafter reports were obtained and those reports are Exts.P5 and P6. On receipt of these reports the matter was forwarded to the 1st respondent for his consideration and the orders of the 1st repondent are still awaited. It is at this stage the writ petition has been filed complaining of delay in finalising the proceedings pursuant to Ext.P4 representation filed by the petitioner. 2. Taking into account the submissions made by the learned WP(C) 7512/08 Page numbers counsel for the petitioner as above, I dispose of this writ petition directing that the 1st respondent shall consider the matter with notice to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-