IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.525 of 2008 VIJYA DEVI Versus RAM PRATAP SINGH ----------- 7 16.9.2008 In the opinion of this Court, the impugned order fixing the liability of Rs. 2,000/- per month by way of maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on the petitioner husband cannot be said to excessive or illegal. The Court below in its reasoned order has not only held that the relationship of the husband and the wife to be admitted but has also recorded the negligence on the part of the petitioner in maintaining his wife. That apart, the Court below has also taken into account the income of the petitioner who is a retired railway employee and is in receipt of not only the consolidated amount of gratuity, provident fund, leave encashment, commuted value of pension etc. but also monthly pension. That being so, this Court would not find any error in the impugned order and accordingly, this civil revision application is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)