IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 14757 of 2010 Date of decision: 13.10.2010 Harjot Singh ...Petitioner Versus Guru Nanak Dev University and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Arun Abrol, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amrit Paul, Advocate for respondent No. 1. RANJIT SINGH J. Costs paid. Reply has already been filed. Counsel for the University has produced the answer sheet in sealed cover, which is opened. Answer sheet is shown to the candidate present in the Court for perusal in the presence of counsel for the University. After perusal of the answer sheet, the counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been under-assessed and prays that the answer sheet be checked in the presence of two other examiners as is provided in the rule. View of the petitioner that he is under-assessed cannot be a valid reason to call for interference. It will be beyond the scope of the writ court to invoke jurisdiction on such grounds. The requirement of the rule is for showing the answer sheet and it has been complied with. No answer given by the petitioner is left unmarked. Accordingly, no case for interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction is made out. The writ petition is dismissed. The petitioner would be Civil Writ Petition No. 14757 of 2010 -2- entitled to seek refund of ` 10,000/- which he had deposited in the Registry of this Court. Let the petitioner file appropriate application in this regard before the Registrar, who thereafter would refund the amount to the petitioner. Answer sheet produced before this Court is returned to the counsel for the University. October 13, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE