:'F ^^ ,^'. i^^ yef /- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARH) W.P. No. (3^0 /2001 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA. Petitioner ;:>«: ^•r^ s^.^-" ^^"I Respondents: Sunil Laakra, S/o Shri Jai Masih Lankra, tged about 40 years, R/o Anusuchit Jati, Janjati Adhikar Parishad, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, - Commercial Tax Department, Government of Chhattisgarh, Mantralay, D.K.S; Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Commissioner (Excise) ( Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Assistant Commissioner (Excise), Bilaspur ,(C.G.) 4. Collector, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5. M/s Macbold Farms, Through it's proprietor ^-< Bhupendra Singh Bhatia, S/o Shri Surjeet Singh Bhatia, R/o Bilaspur (C.G.) \^. •^^. /yKj* BE:E5^E^W' WMT PETITION UNDER ARTIGLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. •9K t0 •A.G. Ba.ASFUri - -5: SXy\'s^ ^ 1. Particulars of the Petitioner : As detailed above in the cause title,.:/); r EB: XI-HC-22 'S^i -'<l'41cf'sl, 9'nl'y'is, (»iwMiy .P. NO. 620/2001 t|)*<MI*t»rai an^l^ Wich sn^r w^w w^ 3ii^i •^snwafCT 10/5/200l Shri B. pyasi, learnejd dounsel for the petj.^ioner / Dr. N.K. Shukla, lear|aed Dy.A.G. for the State. parties are heard, In the original pftfelt]ion the petitioner contended that the plot nos.2A.B,C and petltioner has.comeup ylth ^^-printed stationery, bu~t used for bottling mineral wa petitl.oner is to be belleved bottling plant forbottlj.ng cbf4i^i-^Tf TTP:Rff; '41^st TfSTFSR ^;3lf:;W3H^F D were illegally used fer manufacturj.ng a bottling plafit fea: bottling liguar. Whffi this Court required the'peti.|tioner to submit an affidavlt that on ,v»hat basls the petj.ttLoner stafefi tftat bottllng plant.j^ distillery is being establi.s^ied on fche glot, the F'etj.tienac fi.le<3 hj.s affldavifc on 9/5/2|301. In the sa.ldaffidavlfe, the, ^ different story say.i.ng Ahat the plots were allotted for ^>usiness of ccmputer forms and P.ater on the same were being |ter. If the affidavit of the I, tt cannot be beld that the P.iquor is being established without a licence from the E^ccise Department. On tbe facts availabl^ In the petition, we are unable to hold that present is a fifc matter Eer AataffErenee by the 1 ' ;—••- l.High Court. The petition is]dlsmissed» ^\ Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- R.S. Garg Judge '.'•.1^'>;