... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.780 OF 2001 APPLICATION NO.780 OF 2001 APPLICATION NO.780 OF 2001 IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.779 OF 2001 APPLICATION NO.779 OF 2001 APPLICATION NO.779 OF 2001 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri Rajesh More, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : SEPTEMBER 01, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 01, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 01, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. None for the Applicant. On 12th October, 2001 time of four weeks was granted to remove office objections and it was directed that if the office objections were not removed within the stipulated period, the matter will automatically stand dismissed. Office noting shows that objections were not removed and the conditional order has become operative. Thus, this Application stands rejected. However, without noticing said order dated 12th October, 2001 it appears that Criminal Application No.779 of 2001 for grant of leave to prefer Appeal was placed before the court on 06th February, 2002. As the ... 2 ... Application for condonation of delay was rejected, the said Application for leave could not have been placed before the court without delay being condoned. In view of this position and in view of dismissal of Application for condonation of delay, Criminal Application No.779 of 2001 also stands rejected. Consequently, the Appeal does not survive. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE