C482 No. 416 of 2010 Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Shri D.K.Sharma, Advocate present for the petitioners. Shri.M.A.Khan, Brief Holder, present for the State/respondent no.1 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for respondent no.1. By means of this petition, moved under section 482 of Cr.P.C, the petitioners have sought quashing of the proceedings of criminal case no 2024 of 2010, State vs. Harpreet Kaur and others, relating to offences punishable under section 306 I.P.C, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, IInd, Dehradun. Learned counsel for the petitioners pleaded that the petitioner no.1 is widow of the deceased, petitioner no.2 is father in law and petitioner no.2 is mother in law of the deceased. It is further pleaded that there was no dispute between petitioner no.1 and her husband (deceased). Apart of the statement of witnesses was also read out before this court in support of the argument that the petitioners are innocent. However, this court finds that factual dispute can not be examined by this court in its jurisdiction under section 482 of Cr.P.C. It is for the trisl court to see whether the petitioners are innocent or not. On the record it appears that there is not only evidence of the complainant and other witnesses against the petitioners but also ‘suicide note’ left by the deceased. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, the petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C is dismissed with the observation that if the petitioners Harpreet Kaur and Satnam Singh and Avtar Singh surrender before the court concerned, their bail application shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay. (P.C.P., J.) 12.05.2010 NP