IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39547 of 2009 DHARMENDRA KUMAR @ PAPPU RANA SON OF BIRCHANDRA SINGH, R/O VILLAGE- MAJIRABAD, P.S.- GORAUL, DISTRICT- VAISHALI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 06/01/2010 Heard Mr. Ram Shankar Das learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 27.3.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 44100 of 2008 considering the fact that three witnesses have been examined. Report received from the trial court shows that seven out twenty witnesses have been examined and steps have been taken to procure the attendance of informant and other witnesses. Considering the allegation, presently, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail before the court below if the trial is not concluded within six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)