WPMS 1249/2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Sri Ravi Babulkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri H.M. Raturi, Standing Counsel for the State. Sri Sudhir Singh, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Sri Shailendra Nauriyal, Advocate for respondent no. 2. Sri Sudhir Singh, the learned counsel for respondent no. 1 states that the Committee has taken a decision in its 84th Meeting pointing out certain deficiencies in the institution of the petitioner which the petitioner is required to remove before the matter relating to recognition could be considered. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw his writ petition so that he could approach the authorities concerned after removing the deficiencies. Permission is granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) 07-07-2011 SP