1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.665 OF 2010 1.Mrs.Vijaymala Suresh Chavan & ors. ...Petitioners vs. 1.State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents --- Mrs.Neeta Karnik, for Petitioners. Mr.S.R.Nargolkar, AGP for Respondent no.1. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED: 27th January,2010. P.C.:- 1. The petitioners by this petition really challenge the Government Resolution dated 24.9.2002 granting regularisation of service to the petitioners with effect from 24.9.2002 subject to certain conditions. The cause of action for filing this petition challenging Government Resolution dated 24.9.2002, if the case of the petitioners is accepted as face value, arose in the year 2002. The petitioners did not file any petition after the said Government 2 Resolution was issued. The petitioners have also not given any explanation in the petition as to why they have filed this petition so late challenging the Government Resolution dated 24.9.2002. Not only that the petitioners have acted on that Government Resolution and have executed bonds which were required to be executed by that Government Resolution for getting benefits of Government Resolution dated 24.9.2002. Thus, not only the petitioners have accepted the Government Resolution but have also acted upon that Government Resolution and have received all the benefits to which they became entitled because of Government Resolution dated 24.9.2002. Now the petitioners are turning around and claiming that the Resolution is invalid and they required to execute the bonds under force. In our opinion, in the absence of any explanation for latches, the petition cannot be entertained. The petition is, therefore, rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (A.R.JOSHI, J.)