HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAIVI: HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON’BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Writ Appeal No.222 of 2008 APPELLANT] . Smt. Savitri Bai Khande, W/o. Annulal PETITIONER Khande, (Samvida Shikshak, Grade-Ill, aged about: 25 years, R/o. Village : Singhri, Tahsii : Takhatpur, District : Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Panchayat & Gramin Development Department, D’.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Additionai Coliector, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur (C.G.). 3. The Sub Divisionai Officer, (Revenue), Kora, District : Bilaspur (C.G.). 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat : Takhatpur, District Biiaspur (C.G.) 5. District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur (C.G.) 6‘ The Gram Panchayat Udeia, Through : its Sarpanch,~ Tahsil : Takhatpur, District: Bilaspur (C.G.). 7. Ku. Champa Sevak, D/o. Kamta Prasad Sevak, aged about : 26 years, R/o. Viilage : Singhri, Tahsil : Takhatpur, District : Bilaspur (C.G.) MEMORANDUM OF WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2 11! OF, CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT IAPPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH ACT 2006 READ WITH RULE 157 10 OF CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT RULE, 2005 Present : Shri Pushpendra Kumar Patei, learned counsei for the appeiiant. Shri Kishore Bhaduri; learned Additional Advocate General, for the State! respondents No. 1 to 5. ORDER (17m October, zoos) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri Pushpendra Kumar Patei, teamed counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the writ appeal filed by the appellant against the impugned order dated 10.09.2008, passed in WP. No.3866/2005, with the liberty of filing another writ petition if the future developments so warrant. 2. Permission granted. ’xr 3. With the above liberty, the writ appeal is withdrawn. dismissed sdl- Sd/— chief Justice Judge Sum; Kumar Sinha J,