IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1139 OF 2009 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 369 OF 2008 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 871 OF 2007 IN B.C.C.L.C. SUIT NO. 4009 OF 2006 D.K. Enterprises & Anr. ... Petitioners. V/s. M/s. Siddharaj Builders and Developers & Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. Kirit Mody i/b. M/s. S. Pathak & Co. for the Petitioners. Mr. Mukesh M. Chugh, Respondent No.2 in-person and C.A. Of Respondent No.1. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 16th JULY 2009. P.C. :- There is no reason to interfere at this stage with the order under challenge. If the final order in the Suit is adverse to the Petitioner, then, while challenging the same, they can raise appropriate pleas with regard to the order joining Respondent Nos.1 and 2 and other persons as parties to the Suit. All contentions in this behalf are kept open. The Petition is disposed off with this clarification. (S.C. Dharmadhikari,J.)