-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1990 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2495 OF 2001 Prabhavati P. Koli. ..Applicant. Versus Shobha K. Nair. ..Respondent Mr. S. V. Sadavarte for the applicant. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : August 13, 2010. P. C. : 1. The above civil application is taken out for restoration of above writ petition. By the order dated 9th September 2009, the petitioner was given six weeks’ time to serve the respondent. It was made clear in the order itself that in case of petitioner's failure to take appropriate steps for service of notice to the respondent within the stipulated period, the petition to stand dismissed for non prosecution. The petitioner could not serve the respondent and therefore the above petition came to be dismissed for non prosecution. Mr. Sadavarte, learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner submitted that earlier notice issued to the respondent was returned back with the postal remark “not found”. He srp -: 2 :- further submitted that Advocates B. A. D’lima and J. S. Raymond had appeared on behalf of the respondent in the writ petition, however, they did not file vakalatnma for the respondent. I am satisfied that the case for restoration of writ petition is made out. In that view of the matter civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (a-a). Civil application stands disposed. 2. Office is directed to issue notice of writ petition to the respondent returnable on 13th September 2010. (R.V. MORE, J.)