>? Ht©HCOURT OF CHHATTtSGARH AT BILASPUR WP.^No. 1916 of 2008 Petitioner Baldau Singh Patel, 8/0 Shri Neel Kantti Patel, aged 44 yoars, Aost. Teacher Primary Schoot Surajapur. Block Beria, Disst. DURG(C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Chief Secretary, State of Chhattisgarh, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Secretary (School Education), Deparbnent of School Education, State of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Coltector, Durg. Disst. Durg (C.G.) District Educatlon Officer, Educatjon District Bemetara, Disst- Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITOIN UNDER ARTICE 226/227 OF THE CONSTJTUTION Singte Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri S. P. Kate, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri U. N. 8. Deo, Govt. Advocate for the respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on this 31st day of March. 2008) 1. With the consent of tearned counsel appearing for the parUes. the matter is heard finally. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the pefitioner submite that the petftioner js working on the post of Assistant Teacher in Primary School Surajapur, Block - Berla. He has been relieved for joining at Primary School Borsara, Block - Saja District Durg. He further submits that there js no transfer order in respect of petSUoner. transferring him from the originai place of posting. The petitioner has not filed any doexiinent to support his contention that he has b^n relieved. If there is no ^o- Thakur transfer order in respect of the petlttoner, there is no question of relieving the petitioner from the place where he is working. Be that as jt may, it is for the State Government to examine the facts. narrated by the petitioner and pass appropriate order, if need be. However, the petitioner is at liberfy to make a representation, raising his grievance to the concemed authorjty and in tum e concerned authority shall consider and decide the representation, if any, in accordance with law. In vjew of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. ___— Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge