^ '7ST T<II^M'4, ytliy^Ko, |s|<ni-Hl|,< Hwva <?b*n^fr "^ 200 9TI^T 1(T^T (^elf^^T) -sn^T'^rf^w ?f8H 3TT??T ^RW 'i ^RTTW^ftn ^TT^T W.P.fi PETZTIONER VEfeSUB 2. 3. 4. ^M^^I^ 'HTR^ff ^F ft^ ipsi^K ^^tRFra^r No.5711 OF 2008 Nazaruddm I<han S/o Hazi M:d Idrish Khan, Musliiii, aged about 48 years, occupation Sub Enguieer, Janpad Panchayat, Bhanupratap Pur, Disti:ict Kanker, permarlellt resident of Sargipal Para, Kondagaon, District Bastar (CQ) T:The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Paiicha^^at and Rural Development Department, Mantralay at Dau Kalyaii Bhawan, Raipur (CG) The Collector, District Kanker (CG) The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat^ Kanker (CG) The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchaj^at, Bhanupratappur, District Kanker (CG) State Election Comission, Through Chief Election Conimissioner, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CO) mc—is <37T^T ^T f^t^ 'cT^Tf 3ll<t^l 5b^lcb i& ~3^T ^WM^, ^)tlt^^<o, f®l<ni^^< NI*1Cfll (h*ll<sh •^200 ^ff^T^^ (<ic<I^<^) T^TWc^ftn 3Wt?r ^- Writ Petition under Art SB; HON. SHRI DHIREHORA MISHRA, J 0& 22-10-2008 Shri Rakesh Anthonl SlTi-i YS Thakur, Dy Heard on IA No. Election Commission as r^ Not opposed. The application (IAJ permitted to implead respondent.No. 5 and carr petition duriiig the coursej Sliii AS Gaharwarl respondent No. 5. The petitioner is as dated ls+- October, 2008 vt posted as Sub Engineer been transfeiTed as Sub Yojna, Distt. Kanker. Leanied counsel fo| period ofoneyear, the p4 a quick succession of sb| ^~, counsel for ttie petitioner. AG for the State. P application for mipleading the State |sponderitNo.5. <:?)l^fci<ftrl ^TR^f ^T fe^t <F3i^l< ^•^tRwa^r cle 226 pfthe Constitution of India No.02) is allowed. The petitioner is Klie State Election Comiiiission as ^ out the amendinent accordingly m tiie 1 of the day. counsel appears on behalf of the Igrieved by the order of Amiexure P/1 ^hereby the petitioner, who is presently ^.t Bhanupratappur, Distt. Kanker, has ^ngmeer to Pradhaiiaiantri Gram Sadak the petitioner submits that withiu a ^titioner has suffered thi'ee transfers, ui nionths each. The transfer has been {l-r^- i^y^?:^ ~~^'^'% ll'i^J ^ 1,^ ••.,.,XI-He—78 i'^... l^':,.. 3TI^T ^T Rvlicb ^T8n W^'^RT^F .-^. ~S^ T^WW^, W^WW, [®l(r!l'H^< *11*l<rll 5»»wql -^ 200 ^TT^T 1tT^^ (^f^5^) ^TTW TrfiH 3?^r effected dunng the ban p^ Minister, whlGh is contraj|y Govt. However^ learned coi is not pressing this petitio4 to make a representationj detaiUng his grievances further du'ected to decidel period. sriod without pennission of the Ghief to the transfer policy of the State 4.1-isel for the petitioner subniits that he at this stage and he may be permitted before respondent No.l/State Govt., |saised ui this petition^ who niay be his representation within a specified Slii-i Y.S. Thakm-, le^ for tiie State submits thatj before ti-ie Sfate CTOVt., the| withm a period of three representation. In view of above s4 pai'ties, ttie mstant petit^c petitioner to file a detajiled Govt/respondent No. 1 petition, who, in tm'n, expeditiously, preferably v^ date of receipt of tlie repre^ ch^^T4i'T ^(j^<riT ^ fe^ <n»t^S< ^ 3:ifinr 3TT^[ irned Dy. Advocate General appeanng if the petitioner fries a representation same shall be considered aad decided veeks froni the date of receipt of the bmissions of learned counsel for the on is disposed of with liberty to ftie representation before the State all his grievaiices raised ui this ihall consider and decide the same athin a period of tiiree weeks froni the sentation, iii accordance wifli law. ra4smg SdJ- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ^\