1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CAO NO. 526/2010 IN MCA (Rev) ST. NO. 7294/2010 IN REJ. LPA NO. 36/2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 779 OF 2009 (Late Dadasaheb Mandala Bahu Uddeshiya Vikas Shikshan Prasar Mandal vs. Kum. Nanda Babarao Hirulkar & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JUNE 10, 2010. Heard Shri Jetha, learned counsel for the applicant and Mrs. Wasnik, learned AGP for respondents No. 2 & 3. Nobody appears for respondent No. 1, though served. LPA Stamp No. 17374/2009 (LPA No. 36 of 2010) has been rejected as objections were not removed. Civil Application is for condoning delay of 77 days in seeking its restoration. It is pointed out that the advocate then entrusted with the matter was unwell for long time and hence the matter could not be attended. The learned AGP is strongly opposing the request. However, I do not find any malafide. Hence, delay of 77 days is condoned. The office to register MCA. For the reasons recorded above, the order dated 11.01.2010, rejecting LPA No. 36 of 2010 is recalled and LPA is restored back to file. The applicant 2 shall remove all objections by 22nd June 2010. If the objections are not removed, LPA shall stand dismissed automatically without reference to Court and subject to payment of cost of Rs.1,200/- to High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Nagpur. JUDGE *GS.