IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30912 of 2009 1. MD.HAROON @ HAROON 2. Guddan Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----- 2/ 04.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners have been summoned under Section 319 of Cr. P.C. finding material in course of trial, while submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that only confession is there to show any involvement of petitioners in business of purchase and sale of N.D.P.S. Further, seized substance is examined by Forensic Science Laboratory and has been found not heroine for which it was alleged. There may be every substance in his submission advanced on behalf of the petitioners but material, if any, is available in the Trial Court and summons was issued against him at the primary stage. Taking that into consideration, the prayer of the petitioners is rejected. However, they are directed to surrender before the Court below and pray for regular bail, which shall be decided on the same day on its own merit without being prejudiced by the rejection order, if bail petition is filed after furnishing its copy to the Public Prosecutor. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)