pkn‘L §t“b“ 9@7 @Q BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISQARI‘I AT BILASPUR .P. (S) No. Mk?9q- /200() T/Dr. Smt. Anjali Ou, dhia W/O Shri Umesh Oudhia, Aged , Working as‘ Assistant rsso (Department of Physics), in Govnen V.Y.T. P.G. Autonomo Ce, g, District —Durg, R/o 1— e , Hospital Sector,‘ Bhila, Dsr' Dug (C.G.) Versus Resondents State of Chhattisgarh throh e Secretary, Depar‘tment of l’h Educatlon, Mantralaya, , Ralpur (C G ) T rae o igh he Director Directot f Her Educatlon, D K S Bhavan Raipu The Prlnc1pal Governme . Autonomous College, , ri Durg (C.G.) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA W about 42 years Pofer ermt us olleg Dur 313, Avenu A i itiel r Petitioner p , ug Th lige ' D KS BhaV'm , x (L 0 ) ~ nt VY l PG Durg Distct ' W M HIGH COKERT OF CHHATI‘ISGARH AT BILASPGR gHon’bie Mr. Ju$tice Pa'itinker Diwakerg Wxit Petition 1s; No. 4437;2009 PETITIONER Dr. Smt. Anjali Oudhia Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh 85 Others Shri Manish Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vivek Shanna, P.L. for the State. HT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE GONSTITUTION OF INDIA W ORDER 120.8.2009; With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finaliy. Grievance of the petitioner in this petition orders passed by th is that despite the e High Court of Madhya Pradesh in the identical matters being WP. No. 4863/2001 and WP. 2620/2001 (S) (Annexure 13/10) No. the petitioner has neither been granted Senior Pay Scale from the date she become entitied nor has been granted selection grade. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction may be to the respondents/authorities that if the petitioner makes issued a representation detailing her grievances therein, the same shall be decided expeditiousi’gl. To this submission of the counsel for the petitioner, counsel for the respondents/State has no objection. h a direction to the authorities concerned that Accordingly, the petition is disposed of Wit if the petitioner makes a representation Within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same shaii ts receipt in the light ns of the High Court of Madhya further period of two months from the date of i be decided within a of the aforementioned decisio Pradesh. Sd/_ \\\ N Pritinker DiWaker ’ Judge q/