Criminal Revision No.316 of 1991 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: January 30, 2008 R. P. Goel … Petitioner Versus Uma Chatterjee … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Sh. M. L. Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondent. K.S.Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Petitioner had filed a complaint, in which the Court of Judicial Magistrate (1st Class), Jalandhar summoned the respondent for offence under Sections 452, 504 and 506 read with Section 34 IPC. Aggrieved against the order of summoning, respondent filed a revision petition. The same was heard and disposed of by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar. In para 14 of the impugned judgment, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, relying upon the testimony of Kavita Sharma, has held that since the key of the shop was with respondent Uma Chatterjee, offence under Section 452 IPC is not made out. He further arrived at the conclusion that from the allegations, dispute of only civil nature is made out. I have heard Sh. M. L. Saini and gone through the order of Judicial Magistrate (1st Class) and Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar. I find no infirmity in the order of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar. Criminal Revision No.316 of 1991 (O&M) 2 Occurrence is said to have taken place on 19th November, 1989. After 19 years, there would be no justification to start the trial from threshold. Findings of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar suffer from no illegality. Hence, present revision petition is dismissed. [Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia] Judge January 30, 2008. rps