1 27 wp.2588.10 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2588 OF 2010 Pramod Makalu Prajapati. ... Petitioner Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Police and ors. ... Respondents ----- Mr. A.S.Khandeparkar i/b Khandeparkar and Associates for the Petitioner. Dr. F.R.Shaikh, APP for the State. ----- CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR and P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE : 29 th October, 2010. P.C. 1 Considering the order dated 27 th April, 2010, it is the Petitioner who was expected to approach the Investigating Officer to furnish information in connection with the murder of his brother. The Petitioner when called upon to state whether he visited Investigating Officer after 27 th April, 2010 on instructions the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner visited the Investigating Officer only to submit letter from his advocated dated 27 th April, 2010 and not thereafter. If so, the Investigating Officer cannot be blamed. The Petitioner cannot take advantage of his own wrong. We are informed by the learned APP that the Investigating Officer after due investigation has now submitted report before the concerned Court, which is pending for 2 27 wp.2588.10 orders. If so, the Petitioner may approach that Court for appropriate reliefs, which will be considered by the concerned Court on its own merits in accordance with law. Petition disposed of accordingly. 2 The Petitioner, if makes an application for furnishing copy of the report being brother of the victim, the concerned Court may consider the said application in accordance with law. [ P.D. KODE, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]