vss : 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1046 OF 1992 WRIT PETITION NO.1046 OF 1992 WRIT PETITION NO.1046 OF 1992 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda¦ Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s¦ Orders Order or Directions and ¦ Registrar’s Orders ¦ ------------------------------------------------------------------- None for the Petitioner Mr.Vinod Pandey for Respondent Nos.1(1) to 1(8) CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: OCTOBER 13, 2008 OCTOBER 13, 2008 OCTOBER 13, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This matter has been called out twice, when nobody appeared for the Petitioner. Hence, the petition is dismissed for default. Apart from this, the learned advocate for Respondent No.1(1) to 1(8) states that the dispute has become infructuous in view of the development of the property under the SRA scheme.