''irtW DV THE HIGH COURT OF TUDICATUR^AT BILASFUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0. R /2004 FETITIONER L RESPONDENTS ^ 1. N^ t.iitAI'a^te"; ^WSKl 7<^ / Jffi^ w/ 2. Smt. Sita Thakur, W/o Late Shri RamJal Thakur, Aged about 52 years, R/o. Women's Tribal Ashram, Kaudikasa, Thasil - Ambagarh Chowki, District-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS State of CKhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Commissioner ^•\9' ^w <?J?J 'A ^'JN? / / <i'-^' Tribal Welfare Department Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Block Education Officer Block Ambagarh Chowki, District - Rajnandgaon WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA C-J ;—7i ^"S[ ';?fTqRT3T, e-flly'ie, fs(tll,<-l^< (^f ^^1 OT^ sn^i '^^s C.'^Sy^) sn^i qn h4"h "••n.sn^r'amw qipfferih'roraS ^ fs^ TfSr^ ^••sifinsn^i tbe ai.is..aoo4. Shri Anoop Mazumdar, SIul V.V.S. Murtliy, Dy. ^ AMttl /^rawal, Paael Lawyer for AppUcation for urgent Heard. Leamed oounsel fbr fhe uialter relalcs tu trausfia' of submlts ttiat ttie pctitloncr lias| naxalite area to another subnuts tbat tbe petitioxier is a tfaat the petitioner has aia.de ae^ tUe coucenied autliorily but considered. He also subxalts petitioner aaay be gwen aa reprcsentation before the respoudcnte, whk:h shall be con^ accoidaucc witli law. Having considcred fhe without expressing any opinion the opiiuon of this Court, ends direction is given to fhe I'epicsieutaU.uu ralstug lier auttiorily of tlic respcmdents and this order, wifhin 10 days, Coikasel for the petitioaer. Advucatu- Oeueral wiUi Slul State. is aHowed. heari(ig iietitioner aubtnite that the Ifw pcUIJouer. HB furttier toeca transarred fl»m one naxalite affected aasa.. He also wjdoiw lady. He also subnuts |?eral repreoentationa before Ihe sauie liave uot becu that for the present ttie oppo^-ttmity of filing fte deteited co4ipetent authorily of tiie i^idered on its cwn merits in fadts an and eitcumstanees and tfae merits of (hc casc. in ijif jiistice will be served if a to miake a detailed lie&re lltc coxupcteut ife wltti a cofy of (tie pctllioa ^nd on such rcpresentation peti1|K>aer gilevipiccit aloiife BW""V~T'!"" :—7i siTOT^rft^N;- i*''!i s^r a;*OTr Gowri 7^' '^ww^, gxil.H'is, Fi(diyi{< Cof Z^o/^ N5W 'L-- ^feft- auih4rify mertts lieuig filed, fhe conapetetxt decide the same on its own a reasoncd ocdcr as earlv as weeks fem the date of receipl) made clear that tf any grfevanc^ inay avail thr renaedy avsulable Counael tor tbe petitioue^ has uot bccu relicvcd su fai'. representatton is decided. In view of the facts aad cS? directed fhat tffl fhe petitioncr is not relieved, he be With thc aforesaid disposed of. Consecpientty M.W.P.No.' of. Certified oopy as pesr ruleai ofthe respoDdetits sbalt ia accordaace with law by tjuss3»le ptfefeiuLly wiUuu six of fhe representation. It is still remams, fhe petltfoner the law. Bubniits tfaat fhe petitioner Hc prays for stay tiB (lic liDider ^)l'E<i<n<ft-T 'RR^> ^ 'fe1^ ^P>!^IJ ^;3TRTq3flR5T atcumstances of fhe case, it is is dedded, tf fhe slBowed to contmuc, i, tliis petitiuu stauds Feprcs4utation ob»ir|/utu>us, 4|298/04 also stands disposed Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge