IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.10600 of 2008. Decided on: 22.12.2010. Kuldev Singh. ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M.Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.S.Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that though he has worked for a larger period as Pump Operator, but his services have been regularized as ‘Beldar’. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to seek option of the petitioner as per the law laid down in ‘Gauri Dutt and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh, Latest HLJ 2008(HP) 366’ within a period of two months after the production of copy of this judgment by the petitioner to be considered for the post where he has worked for a larger period. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) December 22, 2010. Judge (krt) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.