1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 353 0F 2010 *** Shivaji S/o Rambhau Ardhe Versus The Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad and others *** 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the order impugned. In this writ petition, only point agitated on behalf of the petitioner, is that in a special meeting convened for no trust motion against the petitioner, one of the member of the Gram Panchcayat was not permitted to have debate on a particular issue. Learned A.G.P. supports the order passed by the learned Divisional Commissioner. The persons who are entitled to sit in the house and take part in the meeting of the no confidence certainly do have a right to address the house, including the person against whom no trust motion is moved. From the record, an order passed by the learned Divisional Commissioner, it appears that the present petitioner is person who was officiating as Sarpanch at the relevant time, was present in the meeting. There is no material to show that one of the member as alleged, having right to take part in the debate in the house, was prohibited and was not permitted by the Presiding 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. Officer. In this view of the matter, petition is devoid of substance. 2. Writ petition stands dismissed in limine. No order as to costs. [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.] Dated:15/01/2010. ans/353