IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40056 of 2010 Jitu Kumar Tanti @ Salman, S/o Ram Bilash Tanti, R/o Malda, P.S. English Bazar, Distt. Malda. ------ Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ----- Opp. Party ----------- 2 12.01.2011 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also taking into account the conduct of the petitioner as noted in the order of the trial court dated 7.10.2010, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, inasmuch as, it becomes self evident that the petitioner also is somehow responsible in delaying the conclusion of the trial. The trial court, however, has indicated in its order that the trial is likely to conclude within a period of six months and, therefore, it is directed that the trial court must take all possible steps to ensure that the trial of the petitioner is concluded within the aforementioned period of six months. If the trial of the petitioner is not completed within the aforementioned period of six months, he will have liberty to move the 2 trial court, which then would record reasons for not concluding the trial including the conduct of the petitioner whereafter the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before this Court. With the aforementioned observations and direction, this application is disposed of. Let a copy of this order be sent to the trial court as also to the Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur to ensure that the witnesses required in connection with Thana Bihpur (Naugachhia) Rail P.S. Case No. 24 of 2009 arising out of S.C. No. 389 of 2009 are produced before the trial court ensuring expeditious disposal of the aforesaid trial. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)