1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 867 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 867 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 867 OF 2007 WITH WITH WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1135 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 1135 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 1135 OF 2007 M/s. Lirin Roadlines Pvt. Ltd., .. Petitioners. vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr. M.S. Sanghavi, Sr. Advocate with H.S. Jain i/by Thakordas Madgaonkar for Petitioners. Mr. Milind More, AGP., for respondent/State. Mr. A.S. Khatib for R. No. 3 in WP No. 1135/07. .. CORAM: J.N. PATEL & CORAM: J.N. PATEL & CORAM: J.N. PATEL & A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE: 14TH AUGUST 2007. DATE: 14TH AUGUST 2007. DATE: 14TH AUGUST 2007. P.C. . These are the two petitions filed by the petitioners who are granted contracts to draw water from the well, which is subject matter of the petitions. It is submitted by the learned counsel for 2 the petitioners that the petitioners have given him instructions to withdraw both the petitions as both the petitions are not properly presented and seeks liberty to file fresh petitions in the matter. We permit the petitioners to withdraw both the petitions with liberty. Both the petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. )