1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders WRIT PETITION NO.7912/2009 Mr. Bhandari Adv h/f Mr. S.V. Gangapurwala, adv. for petitioner. CORAM : B. R. GAVAI , J. DATE : 25TH NOVEMBER, 2009. 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 10.11.2009 vide which application filed by the present petitioner for appointment of court commissioner is rejected. 2. Heard Shri Bhandari, adv. For the petitioner. 3. The provisions of Order 26 Rule 9 of C.P.C. bestows discretion upon the Ld. Trial court to appoint Court commissioner unless this discretion is found to be exercised with perversity, no interference would be permissible under Article 227 of the Constitution. 4. The trial court has given sound and elaborate reasons as to why it is not found necessary to invoke the powers under Order 26 Rule 9 of the CPC. In that view of the no case is made out for interference. Hence, rejected. [ B. R. GAVAI, J. ] Dt: 25.11.2009 aaa/7912.09 ***