IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11544 of 2010 SAMIDA KHATOON WIFE OF LATE MAD SHAHID, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ATRAR, P.S. AURAI, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR…………………………………… PETITIONER Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. NOORJAHAN WIFE OF MUZAFFAR JAMAL @ AFTAB, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-POKHRAIRA, P.S. NANPUR, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI……………………………………….. OPP.PARTIES ---------- 2 6-5-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The order of the Sessions Judge discloses that this petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected by the this Court in April, 2006 and charge sheet was also submitted showing the petitioner as absconder in a case under sections 324,498 and 316 of the I.P.C. and section 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Arguments were advanced to show that section 498-A and other sections of the I.P.C. are not attracted towards the petitioner because she is not named in the F.I.R. and according to petitioner she is even not related to the family of the husband of the victim. It appears that it is a fit case for consideration of regular bail but the conduct of the petitioner shows that she absconded for a long period and charge sheet was submitted showing her as absconder. In this view of the matter privilege of anticipatory bail should not be granted to the petitioner. The prayer is rejected. This order shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner for regular bail. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)