1 ca 14065.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14065 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 3138 OF 2009 Chandrakala Vinayak Autade and others.. Applicants Versus The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. .. Respondent Shri C. K. Shinde, Advocate for Applicants. Shri A. B. Kadethankar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 08TH APRIL, 2011. PER COURT : . This is an application for withdrawal of amount. The applicants have already withdrawn Rs. 6,00,000/- earlier. Shri Kadethankar, the learned counsel submits that the Tribunal has granted excess amount of compensation to which the applicants are not entitled. The multiplier has been improperly applied. In fact the Tribunal has considered the gross salary and net salary should have been considered. 2 ca 14065.10 2. The award is in favour of the applicants. According to Shri Kadethankar, the applicants may not be entitled to the total amount. At the most the applicants would be entitled to an amount of Rs. 7,00,000/-. In that light of the matter, I pass the following order. i) The applicants are allowed to withdraw an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rs. One lac only) on furnishing undertaking that in the event the appeal is allowed and the applicants are required to deposit the amount, they will deposit the same within a period of one month. ii) The applicants are allowed to withdraw further amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rs. Two lacs only) on furnishing solvent security of the like amount. iii) The remaining amount shall be kept in fixed deposit of any nationalized bank. The civil application disposed of. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/April 11