Writ Petition No. 1028 (SS) of 2005 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Interim Relief Application No. 4730 of 2005 Heard Sri I.P. Gairola, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel for both the parties are agreed to decide the writ petition at its admission stage. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted the controversy raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 06.08.2004 passed by this court in Writ Petition No. 1377 (SS) of 2003 (Umapati Bhatt Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others), consequently, the present writ petition may be decided on the same terms and observations of the aforesaid judgment. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is finally disposed of in the same terms and observations of judgment and order dated 06.08.2004 passed by this court in Writ Petition No. 1377 (SS) of 2003 (Umapati Bhatt Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others). Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J) 05.07.2006 S.K.S