14.7.2008. Present: Mr.Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the Appellant. Mr.Anup Rattan, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr.G.D.Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. FAO.No. 314/2004. Heard learned counsel for the parties. With the consent of the parties, the following order is passed: Learned counsels for the parities submit that they have arrived at an out of court settlement and wish to make a statement in that regard. Learned counsel for respondent No.2-Insurance Company submits that the Tribunal has awarded a total compensation of Rs. 33,622/- along with interest and other entitlements. According to him this amount includes Rs.4,000/- paid under the head of pain and suffering. Under instructions from his client he states that the figure of Rs. 4,000/- under this head be substituted with Rs.25,000/-. The respondent- Insurance Company shall pay the enhanced amount along with interest as awarded by the Tribunal within a period of eight weeks from today. Learned counsel further states that he has been authorized by the company to make the statement on their behalf in the Court and the matter be disposed of as having been compromised. Further the Company does not press the cross- objections and the same be disposed of as having been compromised. Learned counsel for the claimant accepts the statement and also requests the appeal be disposed of as compromised. The compromise is in the interest of his client. In terms of the statement made by the learned counsel for the appearing parties, the appeal along with cross objections is disposed of as having been compromised. It is clarified that the interest on the enhanced amount shall be paid in terms of the award dated 27th February, 2004 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (II), Una in M.A.C.P.(RBT) No.10/01/99 titled as Jarnail Singh Vs. Dev Dutt Sharma and another. (Sanjay karol), Judge. July 14, 2008(R)