IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 12198 of 2008. Decided on: 30th December, 2010. Ranjeet Singh. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that his case for regularization should have been considered taking into consideration the higher post held by him. Consequently, the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Gauri Dutt & Ors. Versus State H.P., Latest HLJ 2008 (HP) 366. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of petitioner for regularization after seeking his option as per the judgment cited hereinabove, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 30, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No.