IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.414 of 2009 1. CHANAKYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY THROUGH ITS VICE- CHANCELLOR, A.N. SINHA INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL STUDY CAMPUS, GANDHI MAIDAN, PATNA. 2. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, CHANAKYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, A.N. SINHA SOCIAL STUDY CAMPUS, GANDHI MAIDAN, PATNA. 3. THE REGISTRAR, CHANAKYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, A.N. SINHA SOCIAL STUDY CAMPUS, GANDHI MAIDAN, PATNA. …. APPELLANTS/RESPONDENT NOS. 1, 2 & 3. Versus 1. AKSHAT CHAITANYA, S/O KAMAL SHEEL, R/O MOHALLA – PANDA SARAI (KHAGASARAI), P.O. LAHERIA SARAI, DISTRICT – DARBHANGA. …. RESPONDEDNT NO. 1/PETITIONER. 2. THE CONVENOR, COMMON LAW ADMISSION TEST, NATIONAL LAW SCHOOL OF INDIA UNIVERSITY, NAGARBHARI, BANGLORE, PIN – 560242. … RESPONDENT NO.4/RESPONDENT. ----------- 4. 04.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the private respondent. We find ourselves in total agreement with the views of the learned Writ Court that writ-petitioner was not at all at fault and he cannot be allowed to suffer adverse consequences. The direction to the appellant-University to appear the writ- petitioner appears to be quite justified in law as well as equity. In that view of the matter, we have no option but to dismiss the letters patent appeal as one without merit. DKS/ (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)