1 mss WP++8788 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8788 OF 2007 ANSARI RUBINA ABDUL RAB & ORS. .. PETITIONERS VS. THE COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR THE CITY OF BHIWANDI NIZAMPUR & ORS. .. RESPONDENTS Ms. Snehal Ratnakar i/b S. U. Dhakephalkar i/b A. S. Patil for the petitioners Mr. N. R. Bubna h/f R. S. Apte for R-1 to 4 CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & RAJESH G. KETKAR, JJ. DATED : 4/5/2011 P.C.: The petitioners and respondents 1 to 4 have settled the dispute involved in this petition. Counsel for the petitioners and counsel for respondents 1 to 4 confirm this fact. 2. Consent Terms dated 23/3/2011 duly signed by the petitioners and their counsel and counsel for respondents 1 to 4 and by Mr. J. A. Shaikh, 2 mss WP++8788 respondent 4 i.e. the Administrative Officer of Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation School Board, Nizampur, Bhiwandi, District Thane, taken on record and marked “X”. Order in terms of the Consent Terms. 3. Counsel for the petitioners on instructions from the petitioners makes a statement that the petitioners shall not claim seniority over respondents 6 to 34. This statement is accepted. 4. When we noted that by its order dated 12/2/08 this court had directed that respondents 6 to 34 be made party respondents, we asked counsel for the parties whether the said respondents would be affected by these consent terms. We must record that counsel for respondents 1 to 4 and counsel for the petitioners categorically stated that because of this order, respondents 6 to 34 will not be affected at all. It is in these circumstances that we have taken these consent terms on record and passed the order. 5. Petition is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. (SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.) (RAJESH G. KETKAR, J.)