( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3786 OF 2009 Dnyaneshwar s/o Sadashiv Bhatkute PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. K.M. Nagarkar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for respondents No. 1 to 4. Mr. Milind Patil, advocate for respondent No.5. ..... [CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] [DATE : 9th April, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present petition takes exception to the judgement and order, dated 12-01-2009, passed by the learned Additional Commissioner, Nasik, thereby dismissing the revision preferred by the petitioner and confirming the order passed by the learned Additional Collector, Ahmednagar in an appeal. ( 2 ) 3. The learned Commissioner has found that the way exists in favour of the petitioner from land Gut No. 221 itself and there are no signs of existence of a road from land survey No. 225. In the light of the fact that all the authorities have arrived at a concurrent finding of fact, no case for interference is made out. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed, with no order as to costs. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE NPJ/wp3786-09