IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.428 of 2005 LAKSHMIDHAR TIWARY Versus THE BHIM RAO AMBEDKAR BIHAR UNIVERSITY MUZAFFARPUR & ORS. ----------- 3. 18.09.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State as also the learned Counsel for the University. No useful purpose shall be served by adjourning this matter more than three and half years later after its institution for filing counter affidavit. The claim is for grant of second time bound promotion. The administrative inefficiency compelled the petitioner to bring the matter to the High Court. Even then the respondents did not respond. Contention is of his eligibility for second time bound promotion supported by certain departmental recommendation in his favour. Let respondent no. 2 examine the grievances of the petitioner and if the same be not acceptable dispose it by a reasoned and speaking order. In the event justification is found in the claim or any part of the claim this Court expects that necessary orders for compliance thereof including grant of monetary benefits shall be passed within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order before respondent no. 2. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)