hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 467 OF 2011 The State of Maharashtra ... Applicant Versus Kisan Maruti Bhiugade ... Respondent Mr. J.P. Yagnik, Advocate for the applicant. CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATED : JULY 06, 2011 P.C. We have perused the judgment. In the initial statement of the victim the accusations were of molestation. However, after six months, she came with a case of forcible sex. The medical evidence does not support her contentions. The witnesses examined also do not support the prosecution case for the charge punishable under section 376 of I.P.C. The observations of the learned Sessions Judge do not call for any interference. We find no merit in the appeal which is accordingly dismissed. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.)