IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15624 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 25, 2011 Daljit Singh ...Petitioner Versus Assistant Collector Ist Grade Guhla, District Kaithal & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr.Rajkapoor Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The mode of partition has been prepared and the land has been partitioned as per the mode. This is so recorded by the Commissioner, before whom the petitioner has filed a petition challenging the order passed by the Collector. It is specifically recorded that Nakha-B has been prepared as per the mode of partition by Assistant Collector Ist Grade. Even otherwise, it is noticed that petitioner Daljit Singh has been allotted 2-1/2 acres of good land adjacent to the road and near to the village. In Khasra No.21//3/1, Kuldeep Singh has his tubewell, where petitioner is claiming a land of Kuldeep Singh, where Kuldeep Singh is having a land at a distance of about 3 acres from the Abadi Deh. It is also noticed that land of petitioner Daljit Singh is at one place. House of Charan Singh is constructed over 2 kanals land, which is allotted adjacent to the land where he has a tubewell. As per the counsel for the petitioner, he has no objection so far as allotment of Charan Singh is concerned. To me, there does not appear to be any unfairness, especially so when there is no challenge to the mode of partition. I am, therefore, not inclined to interfere in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Dismissed. August 25, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE