IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 5745 of 2005 Between: Sri SriSri Shyamalamba Sametha Malleswaralaya Sat Guru Seva Sangam, Chandragiri Village & Mandal, Chittoor District, Rep by its President V. Jayasankar Reddy, S/o. Venkateswara Reddy, R/o. Chandragiri, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Endowments, Andhra Pradesh, Tilak Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Joint Commissioner, MZII, Endowments Department, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 3 The Asst. Commissioner of Endowments, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 4 Sri V. Manikrishna, Manager, Group Temples, Chandragiri, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of certiorari calling for records leading upto and inclusive off the impugned proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent in his Rc.No. 867/2005 dated 6-3-2005, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the rules and regulations laid under A.P. Charitable Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act 1987 and the rules framed thereunder and to quash the same, and pass such other order or orders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition has been filed questioning the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 6.3.2005. The 2nd respondent passed the impugned order directing the petitioner to hand over complete charge of accounts and records to the Manager of Sri Puttalamma Devatha temple. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequent to the filing of the writ petition some other order has been passed in favour of the petitioner and, therefore, he seeks permission for withdrawing the writ petition. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to question as and when any order is passed against the interests of the petitioner. No order as to costs. ___________________ (V.ESWARAIAH, J.) 26.4.2005 kpr To 1 The Commissioner of Endowments, Andhra Pradesh, Tilak Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Joint Commissioner, MZII, Endowments Department, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 3 The Asst. Commissioner of Endowments, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 4 Sri V. Manikrishna, Manager, Group Temples, Chandragiri, Chittoor District. 5 2 c.c to the Govt. Pleader for Endowments, High Court buildings, Hyderabad (O.U.T.) 6 2 C.D. copies