(1) CRI. APLN. 902.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.902 OF 2010 Anil Bhagwanrao Kawade and ors. APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. P.B. Gapat, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. P.P. More, A.P.P. for the respondent/State. ..... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 6TH DECEMBER, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1. Heard. 2. Considering the averments in the complaint and the relevant investigation material, the quashing of the F.I.R. and the proceedings is not worth of consideration. The applicants are named in the F.I.R. Their relations with the complainant is undisputed. The complainant alleged that she was subjected to matrimonial cruelty. The marriage was performed on 25.11.2007 and for about 1-1/2 year, she resided with the applicants. It is alleged that the (2) CRI. APLN. 902.2010 applicants demanded Rs.50,000/- for the purpose of ensuring transfer of her husband and due to non- fulfillment of such demand, they subjected the complainant to matrimonial cruelty. The proceedings cannot be regarded as vexatious or arbitrary or illegal. No good case made out for quashing of the FIR. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicants submits that the Application may be considered only for the applicants 4 and 5. Liberty granted to the applicants 4 and 5 to apply for discharge at appropriate stage before the trial Court. 4. The Application is dismissed. Sd/- [V. R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp