1 WP 7003.2008 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7003 OF 2008 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. G.V. Wani, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. L.V.Sangit, Advocate for Resp. No. 2 & 3. ............................ CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 20/07/2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. The petitioner impugns the order passed by the trial Court allowing an application of the respondents for production of documents. 3. Mr. Wani, the learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the production of the documents have been allowed at belated stage i.e. after the plaintiff has led his evidence. As such production of documents could not have been allowed at the belated stage, more so, when no reasons were given for such late production. The 2 WP 7003.2008 application is bereft of any particulars about the relevancy of the documents with the matter in issue. 4. Mr. Sangit, the learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3 supports the order. 5. The Court has allowed the production of documents taking into account the reasons stated, so also has considered the fact that the documents are original, which are relevant and material. The trial Court while allowing the said application, also gave an opportunity to the plaintiff to file additional affidavit of evidence. In such circumstances, no prejudice would be caused to the petitioner. The trial Court has exercised the discretion. No case is made out for interference in writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 6. The Writ Petition as such is dismissed. No costs. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ] KNP/WP 7003.2008