IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DECEMBER 2009 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 33321 of 2009(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.J. MATHAI, S/O. JOSEPH, THEKKANATH HOUSE, THOUNDAYIL LANE, KOCHI -36. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.SEBASTIAN SRI.K.A.ANAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, GIRINAGAR, COCHIN -20. 2. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REP. BY THE SECRETART, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B FOR R1 & R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 33321 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 2nd December, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is an electricity consumer. The electricity supplied to the petitioner's premises was discontinued in the month of January, 2004. Even after the disconnection, the 1st respondent continued to demand current charges from the petitioner for the period subsequent to the disconnection of supply. The petitioner filed W.P(C) No. 9541/2006 before this Court challenging the demand made in that respect and by Ext. P4 judgment, this Court quashed Ext. P3 demand notice in respect of the same. But, an opportunity was reserved to the respondents to proceed in accordance with law. However, the petitioner has now again been served Ext. P6 demand notice without stating any details regarding such demand. It is under above circumstances the petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging Ext. P6. 2. Today, the learned standing counsel for the Board submits that Ext. P6 demand has been issued under a mistake and the same is being withdrawn. This is recorded and the writ petition is closed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.