IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA SECOND APPEAL NO. 87 OF 2010 SMT. LAXIMI LAXIMAN MANGAONKAR AND 3 ORS., ... Appellants Versus SHRI MANOHAR DATTARAM SHIRODKAR (DECEASED) THROUGH LR\'S ... Respondent Mr. Nigel Da Costa Frias,Advocate for the appellants Mr. R. G. Ramani, Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 12th January, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. D'Costa Frias, learned Counsel for the appellants and Mr. Ramani, learned Counsel for the respondents. 2. By this Second Appeal, the appellants take exception to the judgment and decree dated 24th March, 2008 passed by the District Judge, Mapusa in Regular Civil Appeal No.187/2003 whereby and whereunder the appeal preferred against the judgment and decree dated 28th August, 2003 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Sattari in Regular Civil Suit no.17/1995 was dismissed. 3. The appellants filed the above suit for declaration and permanent injunction against the respondents/ defendants in respect of the property bearing No.141/8. The plaintiffs claimed title and possession in respect of the suit property. The respondents claimed that the property allotted by way of alvara to the grandfather of the plaintiffs was later on sold to the defendants by way of sale deed and they continue to be in possession of the suit property. Both the Courts below held that title was vested with the defendants and possession in respect of the suit property was with the defendants and consequently, rejected the claim of the plaintiffs. 4. Having heard learned Counsel for the parties and having perused the record, I am of the considered opinion that the findings recorded by both the Courts below rejecting the claim of the plaintiffs, cannot be faulted with and borne out by the evidence on record. In any case, no substantial question of law is involved in the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA