(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. Criminal Application No. 3531 of 2011 Mistri Industries, Through Its Partner, Ajit s/o. Yeshwant Mistri, Age : 55 years, Occupation : Business, R/o. Plot No. : F-63, MIDC, .. Applicant Ahmednagar, (Original Taluka and District : Ahmednagar. complainant) versus 1. Umeshkumar Jain, Age : 60 years, Occupation : Business, Managing Director - Lumax Automotive System Limited. 2. Nitin Jain, Age : 37 years, Occupation : Business, Executive Director - Lumax Automotive System Limited, Both R/o. Plot No. 78, Sector 6, Faridabad, Taluka and District : Faridabad .. Non-applicants (Haryana State). (Original accused) ....................... Mr. H.H. Padalkar, Advocate, holding for Mr. R.S. Deshmukh, Advocate, for the applicant. (2) Respondent nos.1 and 2 absent, although served. ........................ CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATE : 1ST DECEMBER 2011 COURT'S ORDER : 1. Mr. H.H. Padalkar, learned Counsel holding for Mr. R.S. Deshmukh, learned Counsel for the applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the present Application with liberty to file revision application before learned Sessions Court. 2. In view of the said submission, leave granted, and the present Criminal Application stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. However, it is made clear that the aspect of limitation shall play its own role and if the applicant prefers application for condonation of delay before learned Sessions Court, it be decided on its own merits and in accordance with law. ( SHRIHARI P. DAVARE ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/3531ka