IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 11226 of 2008 Decided on: 22.12.2010 Het Ram …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : None. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 3. Mr. B.S. Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No. 4. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. P.M. Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General submits that since the petitioner has been offered appointment, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge December22, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?