IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.4670 of 2010 Date of Decision : 28.7.2010 Shri Masta Gaddi Beed Wala Baba ....Petitioner Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Sudhir Pruthi, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order vide which his evidence has been ordered to be closed. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that if only one effective opportunity is granted to him, he shall conclude his entire evidence. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the impugned order, I am of the opinion that there is no legal infirmity in the same as three opportunities were granted to the petitioner to conclude his evidence but he failed to do so. However, purely in the interest of justice and keeping in view the fact that substantial and equitable justice can be ensured by compensating the other side with costs, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the instant petition and set aside the impugned order subject to payment of C.R.No.4670 of 2010 -2- Rs.5,000/- as costs and the trial Court is directed to afford one effective opportunity to the petitioner to lead his entire evidence. It is made clear that no further indulgence shall be shown to the petitioner under any circumstances. The revision petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself without issuance of notice of motion to the other side for the reason that having resorted to this process is likely to delay the proceedings further. 28.7.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss