THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU C.C.C.A. No. 156 OF 2007 JUDGMENT: On 19.04.2010, when the matter had come up for hearing, none appeared for the appellant and there was no representation on his behalf. So, the matter was posted to 26.04.2010 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. On that day also, the matter underwent one adjournment as none appeared. Even today, when the matter has come up in the forenoon and also in afternoon, none appears for the appellant and there is no representation on his behalf. The appellant is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the C.C.C.A. is dismissed for non- prosecution with costs. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 31.05.2010 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU C.C.C.A. No. 156 of 2007 31.05.2010 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU C.C.C.A. No. 156 of 2007 31.05.2010 Between: Syed Nisar Ahmed …Appellant And Mirza Basheer Baig …Respondent