IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10535 of 2010 BACHI MANDAL @ BACHI PRASAD MANDAL & ORS . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 03. 7-May-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Complainant. Petitioners are named as accused in the complaint petition with an allegation that they duped the complainant for amount of Rs.1 Lac by assuring him that in a bank opened by the accused persons the complainant would get substantially higher rate of interest but subsequently the money deposited was not refunded. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the entire allegations are false. On the other hand, learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that he has come to know that at least two other cases of similar nature have been filed by other persons against the petitioners. Considering the entire facts and circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. This order shall not prejudice the case of the petitioners if he surrenders and seeks regular bail. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)