{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7176 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8807 OF 2011 Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya, Shantipura, Aurangabad & others Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.S.K.Kulkarni, advocate holding for Mr.D.J.Choudhari, advocate for the petitioners. Mr.V.H.Dighe, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr.H.M.Salve, advocate for Respondent No.3. Mr.U.B.Bondar, advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 08th December, 2011 PER COURT: 1 Heard learned Counsel for respective parties. 2 The matter was heard on 05.12.2011 and certain modalities, emerged during the course of submissions, were recorded. 3 Mr.Kulkarni, learned Counsel for the petitioners, reiterates that the teacher-Respondent No.3 has not adduced proper evidence to stake claim for back wages and it should not be {2} treated as precedent for other teachers in the same Management. 4 The peculiar facts of the present case has reached an arrangement between the parties for allowing total sum of Rs. 4,00,000/- (Rs.Four lacs) payable by the Management to Respondent No.3-teacher. Consequently, it is clarified that it will not be applicable to other teachers / employees to use as a precedent against the present Management. Following terms are settled: (a) Respondent No.3 is at liberty to withdraw Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rs. One lac) deposited in this Court. (b) In addition, the Management/petitioners shall deposit an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rs.Three lacs) within a period of six months. (c) Respondent No.3- teacher, shall waive all his past arrears, dues and he shall not resort to any grievance to any authority on this count. (d) The Management shall prepare pay bills of Respondent No.3 as per the prevalent pay fixation and his eligibility/entitlement. Such bills will be presented to concerned Education Officer of the Zilla Parishad. The Management/petitioner will forward the proposal {3} of Respondent No.3 in respect of arrears of Rs. 4,00,000/- (Rs. Four lacs), which is directed to be released in the present writ petition under the proposal and the formalities thereunder. The Education Officer, Zilla Parishad, in terms of Section 11(3) of the M.E.P.S. Act, will release the emoluments for Respondent No.3 from the grant due or payable or the grant that would be payable to the petitioner Management including out of non salary grants, if available as entitlement of the petitioner. Needless to clarify that in case the Management releases the amount stipulated above, the Education Officer, Zilla Parishad, shall reimburse the same to the petitioner- Management. (e) Respondents No.1 and 2 shall endeavour on receiving the requisitions/bills from the petitioner- Management to entertain the same within the stipulated period of six months. 5 With above clarification, order under challenge remain unaltered. 6 Writ Petition disposed of. C.A. No.8807/2011 stands disposed of. K.U.CHANDIWAL adb/wp717611 JUDGE