IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26772 of 2010 VIJAY BAITHA, S/o Birchi Baitha. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 26.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 307, 427, 504, 302 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code. From the perusal of the First Information Report it appears that during altercation between neighbours this occurrence took place in which the petitioner assaulted on the deceased with the iron rod. It appears from the impugned order that the petitioner was granted liberty to move for bail after framing of charge since he had remained absconding. Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Darbhanga in connection with S.Tr. No. 30 of 2010 arising out of Singhwara P.S. Case No. 2 147 of 2007 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)