(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4973 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4973 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4973 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1337 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1337 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1337 OF 2005 Hamid Ali Mehroodhin Shaikh & Ors ...Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ..... Mr. A.G. Shaikh, Advocate for Applicants Mr. D.P. Adsule, A.P.P. for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 9TH AUGUST, 2005 DATED: 9TH AUGUST, 2005 DATED: 9TH AUGUST, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard both sides. 2. Sufficient cause has been made for restoration of Criminal Writ Petition No.1337 of 2005, hence, writ petition No. 1337 of 2005 is restored to file. 3. Application is disposed of. ***** (-2-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1337 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1337 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1337 OF 2005 Hamid Ali Mehroodhin Shaikh & Ors ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ..... Mr. A.G. Shaikh, Advocate for Petitioners Mr. D.P. Adsule, A.P.P. for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 9TH AUGUST, 2005 DATED: 9TH AUGUST, 2005 DATED: 9TH AUGUST, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. S.O. to 10.10.2005. 2. In the meantime, interim order dated 5.5.2005 to continue. *****