IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.302 of 2011 Date of Order: 3.2.2011 Tejinder Mohan .....Petitioner Vs. Shruti Kant and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr. Neelesh Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. JASWANT SINGH, J (ORAL) Petitioner had filed the present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution assailing the order dated 2.8.2010 (P.5) whereby his application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for being impleaded as party was dismissed. Learned counsel at the time of arguments very fairly concedes that present petition has become infructuous since the suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction stands decided. He, however, prays that the findings recorded in the impugned order qua the rights of the petitioner in the property as also the nature of the property would not affect his rights in the other suit filed by the petitioner. Dismissed as infructuous. February 03, 2011 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manoj JUDGE