IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32252 of 2008 1) Upendra Prasad Singh, son of Late Shiv Shankar Singh, 2) Manoj Kumar, 3) Ranjan Kumar, both sons of Upendra Pd. Singh, village Mohanpur, PS Begusarai Mufassil, Dist. Begusarai – Petitioners. Vs. 1) The State of Bihar, 2) Veena Devi, wife of Mahendra Pd. Singh, village Mohanpur, Begusarai Mufassil, Dist. Begusarai – Opp. Parties. 2 30.6.2011 Heard the parties. This application has been filed for quashing the order, dated 7.7.2008 passed by A.D.J., FTC IV, Begusarai in S.T. No. 56/2008 by which the application under sections 227 and 228 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been rejected. The grounds raised on behalf of the petitioners is that the injury report indicates that it is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. It is said that the informant has produced a second injury report from Dr. Ram Naresh Singh which indicates that the injury is grievous. It is submitted that the injury report subsequently produced by the informant ought not to be considered by the court. The consequence of considering the first injury report would lead to the conclusion that no case is made out under section 307 of the Penal Code. The submission aforesaid on behalf of the petitioners regarding the fact as to whether the court has to give importance to the injury report produced on behalf of the informant will have to be tested and considered during the trial. The court thereafter can conclude whether in the facts offences are made out under section 2 307 of the Penal Code. At this stage this court cannot exonerate the petitioners of the offences alleged and finds no reason to interfere with the impugned order. This application is dismissed. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)