-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.127 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.127 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.127 OF 2006 Kashiram Dhanaji Sawant & anr. ...Appellants Vs. Keru @ Mahadeo Dhanaji Sawant & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Sachin Punde for the Appellants Mr. for the Respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: MAY 5,2006. MAY 5,2006. MAY 5,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Shri Punde for the Appellants. He submitted that the Courts below have not recorded any finding on the issue of existence of nucleus. He submitted that the findings of the Courts below are perverse. The Courts below have recorded concurrent findings of fact that the suit property is a joint family property which can be subjected to the partition. While dealing with the said issue, the Courts below have elaborately considered the oral and documentary evidence on record and have come to conclusion that the nucleus was available. 2. No substantial question of law arises in view of concurrent findings of fact recorded by the Courts below. Second Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. -2- Judge. Judge. Judge.