IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27079 of 2010 Sunita Devi Versus State of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 7/ 03.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The informant has filed this application for cancellation of bail granted to Mahendra Singh and Narendra Singh vide order dated 10.05.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14468 of 2010 in a case under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the respondents is of order givers. This Court noticed that informant and accused are near relative and petitioner no.1 is aged about 80 years and petitioner no.2 is aged about 75 years. Counsel for the informant submits that petitioner no.2, who is respondent no.3 in this application, has wrongly stated that he has fair antecedent. He further submits that he is accused in a case under Arms Act of 1984 and one under Section 386 and 387 of Indian Penal Code in the year 1992. Mr. N.K. Agrawal, learned Sr. Counsel, appearing for the respondent nos. 2 and 3 submits that by mistake the aforesaid statement was made regarding Mahendra Singh, and in fact the cases are old ones, one of the year 1984 and 1992. The respondent no.2 should be more vigilant while making statement in future. With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)