IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26360 of 2010 JAWAHAR LAL @ JAWAHAR LAL RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.07.2010. The petitioner was granted bail on 27.05.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 19267 of 2010 in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 25 of 2010 registered under Sections 364/341 of I.P.C. on the ground that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, his name has cropped-up on suspicion and was on inimical terms with the informant as he deposed against the informant’s father in Title Suit No. 686 of 1988. Hence, the learned court below was directed not to accept the bail bond of the petitioner if he has criminal antecedent. Further liberty was given to the learned court below to cancel the bail of the petitioner if he fails to appear on two consecutive dates. Subsequently after passing of the order dated 27.05.2010 in Cr. Misc. No. 19267 of 2010 the deponent came to know about the criminal antecedent of the petitioner. Hence the bail bond was not furnished and a modification application was initially filed and then the fresh bail application has been filed. It is submitted that in paragraph no. 18 of the petition learned counsel for the 2 petitioner has stated that he is involved in four cases but in those cases the petitioner is on bail and non of those cases are registered under Section 364 of I.P.C. since the petitioner was in jail hence the proper instruction was not available at the time of filing of initial bail application. Considering the fact that the petitioner was granted bail on merits on 27.05.2010,he being 75 years of age and the fact that due to non-disclosure of the criminal antecedent he has further remained in incarceration for two more months after grant of bail, let the petitioner, Jawahar Lal @ Jawahar Lal Rai be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A. C. J. M. Danapur, Patna, in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 25 of 2010. The learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if he fails to appear on three consecutive dates and gets involved in similar nature of the offence. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)