f-f- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR :^0/- FIRST APPEAL No. 19^ OF<200^ ^ li FIRST APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96 OFTHE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE sl^ ?1 APPELLANT Defendant No. 1 :: Grani Panchayat, Khopali, Block Durg, Tahsil and District Durg Jj^ „,,. iJC-G>) through Secretary/ ...y6'^ ^v^lj^'^ Sarpanch Gram Panchayat p..^°-c""l^ ^w~^^^ ^^^ w\i^/e^' ' Khopali, District Durg (C.G.) ,^> ^e^^..-^ VERSUS §! 1 fS RESPONDENTS :1) Evendra Kumar Chandrakar, Son of Dashrath Lal Chandrakar, aged about 37 years, resident of Village Anda, near Bus Stand, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.) (Vendor- Iron rod, Cement, Hardware) Defendant No.2 :2) Deputy Director, Panchayat Evam Samaj Kalyan, Durg, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.) Defendant No.3 :3) State of Chhattisgarh through Collector, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) FIRST APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE /I ^ I-HC—78 ^. ^Ti^'^Tf^N' ^-n '3^7 WRJ^ ^y M',0.^ ^ '^'TRT^, ^:?nTR^, T"^TT^'y ^f.MefQ.^...w.c. ^' ^\^]l\ 3^f ^^ (^-i3^T) ^^TWHftcf ^TI^? ^TOTf "^ ftx€{•:d^K ^ ^RT^ ^B^ie??H5fH»^0STi^Tp?Ar^:e^®Wft£- 13.09.2011 None for fhe appeUant. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Wheu tlie matter is appeai'ed for fhe appellaiit nor on his belialf. Sixice no oue appears representation is made on his b uo option except to dismiss the Accordiagly, this appea prosecution. Ag^awal1, P.L. for the State. out tvvice, none had jany representatioii is made ca|led [or the appeUant nor any ;half, this Court is left witli appeal for non-pix)secutk)u. is dismissed for non- Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge