IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2020 of 2011 RASHMI SINHA & ANR Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 2/ 25.2.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The present writ application has been filed against the order dated 2.11.2010 dismissing O.A. No. 727 of 2010 on the ground of the same being barred by limitation. The appellant- writ petitioners, in the said O.A. had challenged the order dated 4.7.2003 passed by the respondents regarding rejection of the claim for compassionate appointment of the daughter of the applicant no. 1. The appellants had applied for information regarding their claim under R.T.I. Act and took information in August, 2010. The Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal ) was not satisfied with the explanation offered for delay in filing the O.A. and rejected the application as barred by limitation. Learned counsel for the petitioners tried to contend before us that information regarding rejection of their claim was obtained only when they filed an application under R.T.I. Act. It appears from the impugned order itself that the claim of the petitioners was considered by the Railway authorities in pursuance of a direction issued by the Tribunal in O.A. No. 148 of 2001 filed by one of the petitioners. In our considered opinion, the Tribunal was perfectly right in dismissing the said O.A. Accordingly, the matter needs no 2 interference from our end. The writ petition is dismissed. Anil/ (T. Meena Kumari, J.) ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)