IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No. 2629 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 12th March, 2010 Balihar Singh .........Petitioner vs State of Punjab and others .......Respondents CORAM: - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: - Mr. Johny Goel, Advocate for Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. B.B.S. Teji, Advocate for respondent No. 2. .......... GURDEV SINGH, J (ORAL) This revision petition has been filed by the accused- petitioner challenging the order dated 23.9.2009 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Patiala vide which the evidence of the prosecution was closed by order. It is not disputed that only SI, Kuldeep Singh remained to be examined. The State counsel has placed on record the certified copies of orders dated 8.10.2009 and 16.10.2009 passed by that Court. A perusal thereof shows that the prosecution filed an application after the closing of its evidence, vide the said order dated 23.9.2009 for summoning and examining PW, SI Kuldeep Singh, which was allowed but PW , SI Kuldeep Singh could not be examined by the trial Court in view of the fact, that orders passed by this Court, in this petition was produced before the trial Court. Once, the prayer Crl. Revision No. 2629 of 2009 (O&M) -2- of the prosecution for examining PW, SI, Kuldeep Singh was allowed, this petition has become infrucutous. Dismissed as rendered infrucutous. (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE 11.3.2010 preeti