I^JRj P Pl^^pg. i^ij^ ^^J^iil C P 1 ^ m THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.1 W.P. (Cl N0. -7'^ ^ PBTITIONBR --^s^ RESPONDENTS jf^". ^' ^' / <y,^" : ^M/S. RAJENDRA KVMAR PODOAB, A partnership firm, Through: its Partner namefy Sandeep Poddar, S/o. Rajendra Poddar, Aged about *3Zyears, R/o. A-9, Minocha Colony, BUaspur (CG) VERSUS ^| CHHATnSGARH STATE ELECTraCITy BOARD. ^ Through: its Chainnan, Raipur, District ,^^. Raipur(CG) -\o-^y 2] ASSISTANT. ENGINEER, Chhattisgarh State EIectricity Board, West Zone, Nagar Sambhag, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CG) 3] EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CGj WRIT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLB 22f6 OF THB <X)WSTITUTION OP INDIA ^^^\^/ 7 -y^y ./ ..^<'" ^ y <^-:" / XI-HC-78 *11*4^1 StrHT^l 3^T ^l^lcl^, ^Tfl^ll<o, f®tdl<-l^< . t.3p. a-3. ^o.' >>^ 200 {5T Msi<t) (yd^ct^sT) 3TT^T^)Tf^TW cPTTCT^T$h^i<=b ^<n'W^rf?cT3TI^T CM^l<n4)wi ^i^^iT^:teI^I'<F3i<-di< ^3:ri^T3TT^T 24.1.2007 Shri Manoj Paranjpe, A< Shri A.S. (Saharwar, Ad\ Heard. This petition is direct^ Annexure P-7. Leamed counsel for th| bill has been issued to th4 inspection conducted in the before issuing the said bill, n^ Section 126 of the Eiectricitj issuance of such bili is pera becduse of non-payment of connection of the petitioner's On the other h4 respondent/Chhattisgarh 5+4 Chhattisgarh State Electrici^ Chhattisgarh State Eiectricit^ Srievances of Consumers EIectricity Ombudsman) Regi| jvocate, for the petitioner, |ocate for the respondent. [d a9ainst Bili dated 29-11-2006 of i^ petitioner submits that the above petitioner cn the basis of some >remises of the petitioner, however mandatory notice as required under Act was given to the petitioner and •|se illegai. He further submits that |the amount of the bili/electricit/ bremises has been disconnected. tnd, learned counse! for the ^te Eiectricit/ Board submits that y Reguiatory Commissjon has framed Kegubtory Commission (Redressal of xnd Establishment of Forum and iations, 2004 and as per Regutation / P.T.O. XI-HC-78 HI*f^fTff»+11<t» 3^'^TFn^PT, ^Tf1'H<l$, (^dl^^i . t^ - P (^ S>-M0.7 2-/^<W7 ^: 200 3TT^?r ^ra^? ('i^^d6'^) ^n^r^rRFrw cCT'3TT^T$h^icb r §)/- ^/^ ^' ^cTTW^IN^n^T Eiectricit/ Regutatory Commis Consumers and Estabtishment ofl Consequently, M.WP. N^ also stand disposed of. <=bl^F^41^ ^l^<r(Tfffe^<R|^|< ^3Tf^T3TI^T 22, compiaint mechanism has b^en provided for redressai of any dispute of the consumers regarc^ing their eiectricit/ biiis. I have heard iearned cour|se! for the petitioner. This petition cannot be 41terta!ned in the llght of the fact that aSternative remedy under tjie provisions of Chhattisgarh State ^ion (Redressa! of (Srievances of Forum and Electricit/ Ombudsman) Regulations, 2004 is avdlable. In view of the above obs^rvation, the petition is disposed of. 110/2007 and I.A. No360/2007 Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O.