HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH Coram : HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUFTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI T.P.SHARMA, J. APPELLANTS APPUCANTS fl.A.No. 177 of 2005 1. SMT.SARAS BAI, W/0 LATE RAJENDRA SINGH SIKAFWVAR, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 2. VISWAJEEJ SINGH, S/0 LATE RAJENDRA SINGH StKARWAR, AGEDABOUT17YEARS 3. KU. DURGES, ADOPTED DAUGHTER , OF LATE RAJENDRA SlKlGH SIKARWAR, AGEDABOUTT9YEARS, 4. SMT. URMILA DEVI, W/0 LATE RAMJI S!NGH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS All the resident Peepartarai, Tahsil Bilaspur (C.G.) Versys of Village Kota, Distl. RESPONDENTS NON APPLICANTS 1. IVIANISH SHRIVASTAVA, S/0 SHRI V.K. SHRIVASTAVA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/0 KUDUDAND, TAH. & DISTT. BILASPUR (C.G.) (OWNER) 2. KALLU YADAV, S/0 DHAWAJA RAM YADAV, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS R/0 DAUPARA, MUNGELI, TAHSIL MUNGELI, DISTT. BILASPUR (C.G.) •- (DRIVER) 3. BRANCH MANAGER, THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD, BRANCH OFFICE DYALBAND, BILASPUR (C.G.) APPEALUNDERSECTION1730FTMEWOTORVEHICLE ACT. 1988 FORENHANCEMENtOFCOBPENSATtQ^ N subbu Present: None for the appellants. Shri Sudhir Agrawal, learned counsel for respondent No.3. ORDER (03rd Mareh, 2009) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: None for the appellants. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. Consequently, M.C.P. No.180/2005 also stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- T.P. Sharma ^-Judge Rl IX, 1 6rii