CRM-M No. 14753 of 2011 **** Hakam v. State of Haryana Present: Mr. Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Man Mohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 30 dated 20.02.2011, under Sections 379, 411 IPC, registered at Police Station Nagina, District Mewat. As far as the affidavit filed on the last date of hearing a perusal thereof reveals that two more FIRs are stated to be pending against the petitioner. However, a perusal of those FIRs in turn reveals that they are also blind FIRs. Learned DAG, on instructions from HC Fakruddin, has stated that in both the FIRs the petitioner has been implicated on the basis of disclosure statement. Thus, learned DAG has argued that in three separate cases the petitioner having been named the present is a case where the benefit of anticipatory bail should not be granted. It may be true that the petitioner is guilty of the offences alleged against him but till date in all the three cases which have been registered against him he is sought to be implicated on the basis of disclosure statement. Learned DAG has further argued that Sections 420 and 485 IPC have also been added but have fairly stated that those have also been added on the basis of disclosure statement of the co-accused. In this view of the matter, I do not deem it appropriate to deny the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner appear CRM-M No. 14753 of 2011 -2- before the investigating officer on 05.09.2011 between 10.00 a.m. and 4.00 p.m. and on any other date on which his presence is required by the investigating officer. The investigating officer shall, on his appearance, release him on bail to his satisfaction, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE August 25, 2011 sunita