IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 8303 of 2008. Decided on 2nd December, 2010. Naveen Chand. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Y.W. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has sought re-fixation of his pay w.e.f. 22.06.1996 with consequential benefits, including arrears in accordance with F.R.-22(I)(a)(i). 2. Case of the respondent-State, in a nut-shell, is that the Secretary (Revenue), Govt. of Himachal Pradesh has issued an order on 03.04.1999 to keep the matter of stepping up of pay fixation in abeyance due to the pendency of O.As. No. 1501/1992, 1609/1992, 1560/1992 and 1607/1992. However, it can safely be presumed that these Original Applications had already been decided. 3. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for re-fixation of his pay as per F.R.-22(I) (a) (i) on the basis of the decision rendered in O.As. mentioned hereinabove, within a period 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - of eight weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. Copy dasti, on usual terms. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 02, 2010. (bhupender) - 3 -