IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15960 of 2008 RAJESH JHA @ RAJESH KUMAR JHA W i t h Cr.Misc. No.30699 of 2008 RAJEEV THAKUR @ SULTAN @ SULTUN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 30/7/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners, who are in custody since 5.8.2005 and September, 2004 respectively, renew their prayer for bail in a police case under Section- 364A of I.P.C. Learned counsel, with reference to earlier rejection, submits that in the statement under Section- 164 Cr.P.C. the victim had alleged forcible abduction on the point of the firearm, inter alia, by the petitioner, but in his deposition during trial he has himself stated of having accompanied voluntarily to Hazipur on the promise that his monetary dues shall be paid to him there. The same, therefore, is not a case of professional abduction, but acrimony arising out of a business dispute. Considering the grant of bail to other co-accused in Cr.Misc.No.34752/07 which, in - 2 - turn, notices grant of bail to another co- accused from whose custody the victim was recovered noticing the deposition of the victim during trial when he did not identify the latter, let the present petitioner Rajesh Jha @ Rajesh Kumar Jha in Cr.Misc.No.15960/08 and petitioner Rajeev Thakur @ Sultan @ Sultun in Cr.Misc.No.30699/08 be also granted bail on furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge-XIth, Patna in Sessins Trial No.423/05 arising out of Kadamkuan (Patrakar Nagar) P.S. Case No.641/04. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )