(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 889 OF 2004 SECOND APPEAL NO. 889 OF 2004 SECOND APPEAL NO. 889 OF 2004 Raghunath Anant Kadam & Ors. ...Appellants Versus Vasudeo Mahadeo Jangam ...Respondent ..... Mr. Vinod V. Savaji i/b P.B. Shah, for Appellants. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S. OKA, J. A.S. OKA, J. A.S. OKA, J. DATED: 12TH JANUARY, 2005 DATED: 12TH JANUARY, 2005 DATED: 12TH JANUARY, 2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- . The learned advocate appearing for the Appellants states that the sole Respondent expired about four to five months back. No application has been made for bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased Respondent within the stipulated period of limitation. Hence, this Second Appeal stands abated with no order as to costs.