:C—78 '7ST T*ii<4i(n'4, ^•a1<4<i<o, fsldl-y^ HI*ICTI ^^(q, •"•••——-^^ 200 ^TI^T 1q^7 (^i^^l) ^l^l ^RT'f^tNT H^i ^TI^T ^RTSR' NNaNW' ^witsiR tiiia 371^1 Writ Petitlon No.4304/2005 PBTITIONERS 1 2. 4. 5. Prashaiil Singh Occupati|on0 Wing, Distt. Mrigaag Dutt, ai Clerk, (£ Krishi Dhaoitail Kjishi DUamtad U|paj 3, Vishwanfe.fh. Bahadurl Occupat|< Upaj ^ Dhaiataj 6. 7. 8. Tirafh Siaha, Clerk, SamitiKI Naresh Ninnatk^ Asst. Si Upaj Dhaiataf Gamdh Aged a| Nirashril Kurudh, Premlal Patel, sub-Insi Maridi HirendN Sah.u, Peon, cDi^t<n<fl^ 'W^if ^* fe^i' <P»1^1< '^3TRW3TT^T Ram Kamal Venna, S/o Late Shri Jarab ^erma, aged about 39 years, )-Asst. Sub-Inspector, Nirashrit C+ishi Upaj Mandi Saaiiti Dhamtari, Ijamtmi (CG) jMohan Dutt, S/o Shri Kalicharan ^ed about 38 years, Occupation |ahayak Grade-III), Nirashrit Wiag, Maadi Samiti Dhamtari, Distt. L(G) Prasad Shukla, S/o Shri Ram Shukla, Aged about 38 years, [on Peon, Nirashrit Wiag, Knshi llaadi Samiti, Dhamtari, Distt L(CG) Siaha, S/o Shri Gosai Ram ^ged about 38 years, Occupation lirashrit Wiag, Krishi Upaj Maadi |umd, Distt. Dhamtari (CG) [Nirmalkar, S/o Shrl Bhaoo Ram ^r, aged about 35 yeas, Occupation ^ib-Inspector Nirashrit Wiag Krishi F|taadi Samiti Kurudh, District L(CG) |Lal Sarva, S/o Soinaa Raia Sawa, >out 38 years, Occupation Peon Wiag Krishi Upaj Maadi Samiti 1 Distt. Dhamtan (CG) |Patel, S/o Late Shri Jaipal Siagh ^ed about 40 years Occupation Asst ^ector Nirashrit Wiag, Krishi Upaj 3|amiti Nagad, Dt. Dhamtari (CG) Kumar Sahu, S/o Shri Rahal Singh ^ged about 35 years, Occupation |irashrit Wing Krishi Upaj Maadi aded Slamitl -^y ..r -^y-Xl-HC—78 '3^T ^I^Krl^ ^Tft^4S<o, f^TR^; MlH<?n ^l^T^ "Wt 200 ^T^T '^^(^cif^<^r) .ST^-^Tf^H^ TT^T 3^T ^^NT RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Samiti (Chliattis! Versus State of| Dhamtad Maaagiag Secretaiyj Secretaiy District D Secretaiy District D '^F?fem^ WR^ff ^c ft^t Tf^^R ^^fw^i^r Nagari, Distt. Dhaaitad garh) Chhattisgarh, fhrough CoUector Distdct Dhamtari Chhattisgarh Director, C,G. Rajya Krishi Vipnaa Board, R^ipur Chhattisgarh Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Dhamtarij, Distdct Dhamtad (CG) Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Kunidh ^iamtari (CG) Krishi Upaj Maadi Samiti Nagari ^iamtan (CG) WRIT PBTITION UND^R ARTICLE 226/227 OF THB CONSTnlUTION OF INDIA rnii Mti it2y»^-,»,:W...te.(»;.;.,•f.ysrspiw^'-.yc^^.y SB: HON. SHRI DHIRENDRA MtSHRA. J. 03-02-2009 Shri Devendra Patel, coun^el for the petitiouers, Shri Paakaj Shrivastava, F^anel Lawyer for the State. Shri R.K. Dewaagan, Ad^ocate appears on behalf of Shri R,S. Marhas, Advocate for respondents 2 to 5, Heard. j Leamed coiuisel for fhe p^titioners submits that during pendency of fhis petition, fhe petitioners have been reguladzed by fhe respondent No.2 vide order dated 13.10.20Q8 S& 26.12.2008 and thus, so far as the grievaace of fhe petitioners No.j 1 to 7 is concemed, fhe saaie staads pedressed. He furfher submits tiiat this petition may be disposed ofwifti Uberty to fhe petitioner N0,8 to |51e frcsh representation for redressal of 1 s XI-HC—78 3T?^i ^T 'fe?rr^ •^qi a^i^i ^rqT^T N^' ^ "3"^ '^1^1^4, 'S^TFT^, '^TR? <<TWIT ^Ptra? •^-200 ^T^T ll^eb (^i^^f) ^TOR"€ft^3^T ^_ 4- ^RfeT^i 'RP^ ^F ^S iN^T? ^^R 3??^¥T his grievaaces raised in ftiis pet|tion before the rcspondeut No.2, who, ia tura, niay be further directed t<^ consider and decide the sacae wifhin a specified period, On fhe ofher hand, S] appearing for respondents No. 2 ioJ&nctuous, whereas in ca bri R,K. Dewangaii, leanied counsel to 5 subiaits fhat petition on behalf of the petitioners No, 1 to 7 41ay be disniissed as haviag becoine ?e the petitioner No.8 files fresh representation for redressal ofh^s grievances before fhe respondent No,2, fhe same shaU be considered anp[ decided by fhe respondent No,2 withiin a period oftwo months from fhe |date ofreceipt of representation. In view of the above subm&ssion of learaed counsel for fhe parties, the petition on behalf of fhe r^spondents No, 1 to 7 is dismissed as havmg becoiiie iafructuous aad fhe petition on behatf of petitioner No.8 is disposed ofwith Uberty to hii4 to file fresh representation for redressal ofhis grievaaces, raised ia fhis ^eUtion, before fhe respondent No.2. On receipt such representation bcjmg made, the respondent No.2 shaU decide the same wifhia a period ^ftyyo monfhs froia fhe date of receipt of representation, [ -— Sd/- 1 Dhirendra Mishra j Judge -fr';-''-^'-'-''*-*-^.-"^^'^.-?'!