THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO.15333 OF 1996 Dated 13th September, 2007 Between: Ganti Krishna Murthy …Petitioner And Deputy Transport Commissioner And Licensing Officer …Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO.15333 OF 1996 O R D E R (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Bilal Nazki): It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the controversy raised in this writ petition is covered by a Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kanapala Rama Rao v. Regional Transport Officer, Srikakulam[1]. In this view of the matter, following the same judgment, the writ petition is allowed and the impugned demand notice is set aside. If payments have been made by the petitioner, he is at liberty to approach the respondent. Respondent may pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. No order as to costs. ___________________________ Bilal Nazki,J Dated 13th September, 2007 ____________________________ Ramesh Ranganathan,J vrn [1] 2001 (6) ALD 402 (FB)