Crl. Misc. No.M-32474 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-32474 of 2010 Date of Decision: November 10, 2010 Paramjit Kaur …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Rakesh Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner claims that her son has been involved in a criminal case on the allegation of having furnished forged surety bonds/ bail bonds. Details of the case have not been mentioned in the petition. The petitioner seeks a direction to the State authorities for taking action against the police officials i.e. respondents No.4 to 6. Crl. Misc. No.M-32474 of 2010 [2] I have gone through the representation annexure P-2 submitted by the petitioner to the Commissioner of Police, Amritsar, with a copy to the Chairman, Punjab State Human Rights Commission, Chief Justice and DGP, Punjab. Taking into consideration grievance of the petitioner, I do not deem it appropriate to exercise inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to issue any direction to the State authorities. All the pleas of defence available with the petitioner can be raised during the course of trial of her son. Dismissed without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to avail other legal remedies available to her. November 10, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE