1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Contempt Petition No.210 of 2004. In Writ Petition No.2595 of 2000 (Pending). [Vishwambhar S/o Udhaorao Nagrale] VS. [Shri Vijay Mathankar, Commissioner, State Excise and Prohibition Department and another] ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri A. V. Khare Advocate H/F Shri S. S. Oditel Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. Bharti H. Dangre, Addl. G. P. for the Respondents no.1 & 2. Coram: A. H. JOSHUI, J. Dated: 25th March 2008. 1. The respondent has tendered to the learned Advocate for the petitioner two cheques, photo copies whereof are taken on record. 2. The contempt is substantially purged. The Petitioner is satisfied with the compliance.. 3. Learned Advocate for the petitioner, however, craves liberty to agitate the question if there be any discrepancy in the payment. 4. In such eventuality, the petitioner is free to represent the 2 same to the respondents which the respondents would consider and decide in accordance with law. 5. In view of this, notice is discharged. 6. Contempt Petition is disposed of. JUDGE Sbm