: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.88 OF 2009 Shri.Narendra Chandulal Naik ...Petitioner Versus Mumbai Municipal Corporation & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mr.A.V.Anturkar i/b Mr.S.B.Deshmukh for Petitioner. Mr.K.K.Singhvi, Sr.Counsel with Mrs.V.S.Gharapure for Corporation. ...... CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : OCTOBER 15, 2009. P.C. : 1. Learned Counsel appearing for the Corporation submits that the permission granted to Respondent No.4 has already been revoked and thus that cause of action does not survive. He further states that the Commissioner in exercise of statutory powers, would examine the matter in relation to the grievance raised by the Petitioner of the fact that Respondent No.4 has earned a disqualification under Section 16 of the Act on representation made by the Petitioner. Such representation be filed within two weeks from today. : 2 : 2. If such a representation is made, the competent Authority would examine the matter in accordance with law expeditiously, in any case, not later than ten weeks from today. In view of the statement made, nothing survives in this Petition. The same is disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. (Correction carried out in terms of order dated 12/11/2009)