3\ fcyiii»iitrfi^i»iii^s~,tv^wya~s C! i~B'(ufria o^.i ;UI3|C|jMS| l/'ijh.flflD CIM! ~st\s ^wi^ii- r^UlVi.F^i'^. ^ii^ri^^, ^» Naresh Raiwade, S/o Late Shyam!al RsjtVade, sged about 35 years, Member of Zila Panchayat. Surauja. R/o Janpad Panchsyat & Viiiage Ramanuj Nagar, Distt - Surguja (CG) •? 3 State of Chhattisgarh, Throuah Secretary, Panchayat & Rurai Development Department, Dt Bha»vsn, Mantraiaya, Raipur (CG) Goliector Surguia -' Ambikapur Distt SUFQUJS (CG) Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Dfett. Surguja Chhattlsaarh. 4 Executlve Engineer, Rurai Engineering Division, Surauia. D Ser-/ices, Surguja istt Surauia (CG). \f\->). Present : Smt MeenaShastri, counsel for the petitioner. Shri VVS 8i4urthy, Deputy Advocate Generai for the State / respondents No.1 & 2. : (12th Novembe', 2009) The fotlowina ordes the Court was oassed Learned counse! forthe parties are heard. ?) The petitioner has filed this writ Detition styied as ^'PuteEic Interest Litiaation' for the foliowina reliefs : bv 1: 2 ^ ;t 10.1 That, the Hon'ble kindiy be pleased to issue appropriate writ, direction commanding the respondents to quash the order dated 20.12.2007 ana' to restrain the respondent no.3 to construct the building of Janpad Panchayat, Ramanuj Naaar, Distt. Surguja. 10.2 That, the HQn'ble Court further be pleased to direct the respondents to prosecute the liable authority and to recover the allotted/ received monev with bank rate interest. 10.3 Any other relief, as it may deem fit and proper in the facts & circumstances of the case along with costs ofthe-petition." 3). The petitioner's case in substance i^ that for the construction of 'Janpad Panchayat building, Ramanujnagar, Surguja', an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- was sanctioned in the year 2000 and building vi/as constructed. Again in the year 2007, another sum of Rs.25,,00,000/- has been sanctioned for the construction of the same building for Janpad Panchayat, Ramanujnagar, District 4) Shri WS Murthv, iearned Deputy Advocate General on the basis of the Instructions / information received from the Executive Engineer, Rural Engineering Services, Surajpur, Districtl Surguja submits that the building for whicha sum of Rs.25,00,QOO/- hss been sanctioned in the year 20071s another building for Janjiad 'anchayat, Ramanujnagar, in addition to the earlier ibuilding sanctioned in the year 2000 as the earlier buildina was not sufficierit for Janpad Panchayat, Ramanujnaaar. r 3 ^z 3) In view ofthe above mentioned facts, vve deciine fo entertain the writ petltion filed as 'Public Interest Litiaation'. The writ petition, therefore, fails and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- Chief Jusdce Sd/- SunaKumarSinha Judge ;adma ' i -.1 i9A