AB 4310/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C. UPADHYAY Heard Mr. SC Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. BB Gogoi, learn ed Addl. P.P.. This is an application u/s 438 CrPC, seeking pre-arrest bail on behalf of the pe titioners, 1) Pobitra Nunisa and 2) Romen Thaosen, in connection with Haflong PS Case No.64/2011 u/s 120(B)/406/420 IPC. On the basis of the FIR lodged by the first informant regarding fraudulently ret aining of money by the accused/petitioners, the case was registered. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in a similar case, the privileg e of pre-arrest bail has been extended to the petitioner No.1 by this Court vide order dated 28.9.11 in Haflong PS Case No.35/11 registered u/s 409/420/34 IPC. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners are only investors in the company which is operated by a financial company based at Malaysia. Considering the nature of allegation and the matter in its entirety, I am of the considered view that the accused/petitioners can be extended the privilege of p re-arrest bail. Accordingly, it is provided that in the event of arrest of the Petitioners, 1) P obitra Nunisa and 2) Romen Thaosen, in connection with the aforesaid case, they shall be released on bail of Rs.10,000/- each with 1 surety of the like amount t o the satisfaction of the arresting authority on condition that they shall appea r before the I.O. as and when directed to do so and they shall cooperate with th e investigation of the case. The bail application stands disposed of.