Page 1 of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 9785 of 2010 Chandra Sekhar Rout …. Petitioner Mr. S.B. Jena, Advocate -Versus - Union of India and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. N.K. Sahu, Advocate (for opposite party Nos. 2 and 3) CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER_ 01.08.2022 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard in part. 3. List this matter on 29th August, 2022. 4. Mr. N.K. Sahoo, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 submits that he would like to file an affidavit indicating the practice followed by the erstwhile Regional Engineering College, Rourkela with regard to appointments under the Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme. Further, he would like to bring on record, the reasons for the decision taken by the Board of Governors to reduce staff by 75% and the rationale of including the appointees under Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme in the said group of 75% staff. (Sashikanta Mishra) BC. Tudu Judge Order No. 13.