CWP No. 215 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CWP No. 215 of 2011 Date of decision: 21.10.2011 Mewa Singh ........ Petitioner Versus Chief Administrator, HUDA, Panchkula, Haryana and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Sanjiv Pandit, Advocate for the petitioner Ms Anita Balyan, Advocate for Mr. Deepak Balyan for the respondents -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Petitioner herein is challenging his suspension order dated 25.06.2010 (P4) having been passed without any reason or giving him any opportunity of being heard as also the same was not accompanied with any charge-sheet. Upon notice, learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record a copy of the office order dated 24.01.2011 issued by the Chief Administrator, HUDA, vide which, the petitioner's suspension order has been revoked. CWP No. 215 of 2011 2 In view of the above, the present petition is rendered infructuous. However, taking into account the fact that no charge sheet has been issued, no inquiry was initiated and the suspension order has been revoked, the respondents are directed to pass an order with respect to the regularisation or otherwise of the suspension period of the petitioner within one month from the receipt of the certified copy of this order. In case, the suspension period is treated as a period on duty, the respondents shall release all the benefits to the petitioner. However, it is decided otherwise, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same before this Court. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 21.10.2011 mohan