IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1160 of 2009 SULOCHNA KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02 04.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties. The contention is that the order on the writ Court has not been complied with. The petitioner had willfully opted not to press the writ application on merits, but only desired a disposal on his representation, which he admits has been done. The direction of the Court was for disposal of the representation. There was no adjudication on his claims by the writ Court with direction for a specific compliance. There is no occasion for the Court to proceed in the contempt jurisdiction. If any grievances are surviving on the representation so deposed, the remedy lies in a fresh writ application. The application stands disposed. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)