IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2011 / 1ST ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 25186 of 2011(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- ISAN ABDULLA P., S/O.ADV. KUNJABDULLA PEROOLI, PEROOLI, PAYYOLI POST, CALICUT-673522. BY ADV. SMT.K.V.RESHMI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, COCHIN UNIVERSITY P.O., KOCHI-682022. 2. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, COCHIN UNIVERSITY P.O., KOCHI-682022. 3. CO-OP. ACADEMY OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION, COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, THALASSERY, ERANHOLI, KANNUR-670107. R1, R2 BY ADV. SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE R3 BY ADVS. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 25186 of 2011(W) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX --------------- PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ----------------------------------- EXT.P1. COPY OF THE MARK LIST ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT, DATED 10.06.2011 (SL. NO.184270). EXT.P1(A). COPY OF THE MARK LIST ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT, DATED 11.07.2011 (SL. NO.209011) EXT.P1(B). COPY OF THE MARK LIST ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT, DATED 22.07.2011 (SL. NO.208597). EXT.P2. COPY OF THE MARKSHEET (REG. NO.15082016) DOWNLOADED FROM THE WEBSITE SHOWING THAT THE PETITIONER HEREIN HAD FAILED IN MACHINE DESIGN, PART I, EXAMINATION. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.19782 IN BOOK NO.50, DATED 06.09.2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL -------------------------------------- / TRUE COPY / P.A. T JUDGE VK ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 25186 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 6th Semester examination was declared, he had failed in one paper. He applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 6 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-