/, smm: atwcyé K/glayx @ J’ f IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) .. 2009 Q¢\l3 a y /Manaharan Lal Ianghel, Aged about 54 ‘ years, S/o Late Shri Adhin Janghel, .presently posted as Tahsildar, Tahsil Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: /1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of General Administration, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaa, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) r The Secretary Department of Revenue and Disaster D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Management, Collector District Iashpur (Chhattisgarh) Shri T. R. Maheshwari Posted as Tahsildar, ' District Bilaspur (C.G.) Tahsil Pendra, Chhattisgarh State Election Commission, through the Commissioner, Mahanadi Khand, Mantralaya Premises, Raipur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF ~ MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- : y \ 111 2005 m’m (Win) wmm WWW ‘Wm WmR ageifmm SE : H$1WBLE SHRE gifS'E’ECE PRE‘QXNKER BIWAKER 13.07.2009 the petitioner. a‘ta/‘msp‘ Na 1 to 3. Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 30.06.2009 issued by the respon ent N02 by which the petitioner who is Working on the post of Tx siidar has been transferred from Abhanpur, District Raipur to Distri t Surgija. Counsei for the petitioner mits that present is a case of frequent transfer Where in the last two years the petitioner has been transferred three times. He furth r submits that the order is in complete violation of the policy of t e government. He submits that he may be permitted to withdraw e petition with liberty to file representation to the respondent No.2 He however submits that direction'rnay be issued for deci ing the representation so made expeditiously. Learned counsel for the St e submits that let the petitioner make a fresh representation to the respondent No.2 and that would be decided within the time frame. smissed as withdrawn with the iiberty as aforesaid. it is direct that if the petitioner makes a representation within a period of te days from the receipt of the copy of this order, the same would be deicded within a period of three weeks from the date of its receipt. ll then the impugned order shalt not be given effect to. / ‘- Shri‘ditendra Pali, counsel Ms. Sunita.Jain, P.L. for th Accordingly, the petition is e Sd/— ritink‘er Diwaker , Judge é f ‘ e a b h i i P