IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.306 of 2001 KAILASH SAH @ PARMANAND SAH, Son of Ramayan Sah, Resident of Village-Saraiya Pahar, P.S.-Barauli, District-Gopalganj. …….Plaintiff ..Petitioner Versus 1. RAMAYAN SAH, Son of Keshwar Sah. 2. Amin Sah. 3. Hiralal Sah. 4. Mohan Lal Sah. 5. Bhagwan Sah. 6. Sri Ram Sah. All sons of Ramayan Sah, Resident of Village Saraiya Pahar, P.S.-Barauli, District-Gopalganj. …….Defendants…Opp. Parties ----------- 15/ 21.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 18.11.1997, passed in Misc. Case No.6 of 1997 by learned Sub-Judge IV, Gopalganj, whereby the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner for restoration of Title Suit No.75 of 1993, which was dismissed for default by an order dated 08.04.1997 (wrongly written as 04.08.1997) has been rejected. On perusal of the order impugned and after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court does not find any legal infirmity or jurisdictional error in the order impugned. This Court further finds that the present 2 Civil Revision application was dismissed against opposite party nos. 1 and 3 due to non-compliance of Court’s order dated 05.04.2004. Subsequently, restoration application was filed on behalf of the petitioner vide M.J.C. No. 2067 of 2004 and was allowed by an order dated 28.01.2006. But again the order passed by this Court in aforesaid M.J.C. application was not complied with and it was rejected once again due to non-compliance of per-emptroy order. Hence otherwise also this application has become incompetent. For the reasons recorded above, this court does not find any merit in the present Civil Revision application. It is, accordingly, dismissed. However, dismissal of the present Civil Revision application will not come in the way of the petitioner to pursue his other remedy, if available to him under the law. Anjani/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)