Page 1 of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.13684 of 2004 Abhimanyu Paspu Reddy …. Petitioner(s) Mr. S.S. Rao, Sr. Advocate -versus- Tadingi Jaganna & Ors. …. Opposite Party(s) Mr. U.K. Sahoo, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH Order No. ORDER 12.10.2022 04. 1. Heard the submission of Mr. Rao, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the Petitioner on the aspect of issuance of notice. 2. As this Court finds, the Opposite Party Nos.2 to 4 are State parties, they need not be issued with notice. But so far as service of notice on the Opposite Party No.1 being the contesting Opposite Party and the party likely to be affected, is concerned; this Court finds difficulty to issue notice to the Opposite Party No.1 after 18 years. This is an old matter pending since 2004. This Court does not like to give any such liberty to the Petitioner at this stage. 3. This Writ Petition stands dismissed for the Petitioner’s not showing appropriate interest at appropriate time. (Biswanath Rath) Judge Ayaskanta Jena