COURT No.2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) 863/2001 (Old No. 34350 /1999) Gopi Chandra …….Petitioner Versus Deputy Director of Consolidation, Saharanpur & Others ……..Respondents Sri Lok Pal Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Sri H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no. 1. None for the respondent no. 2 & 3. 23 rd July, 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 22.7.1999 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Saharanpur, which is contained in Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition. 2. The dispute pertains to he chak road. By the impugned order, a chak road which was up to the petitioner’s chak no. 70 at plot no. 168/2 was extended only up to plot no. 168/1. On perusal of the materials available on the record, it is revealed that manure pits are situated in plot no. 167 and 168/1 and the Deputy Director of Consolidation passed the impugned order in the larger interest of the village people so that they may carry their bullock carts from the manure pits situated in plot no. 167 and 168/1. 3. I do not find any infirmity or illegality in the impugned order and it does not call for any interference by this Court. Accordingly, writ petition being devoid of merit is dismissed. However, it is made clear that impugned order of the revisional court is confirmed subject to the condition that the area of the petitioner shall not be reduced. If any portion of the chak of the petitioner has taken in chak road, he shall be given land equal thereto from the public utility land. There shall be no order as to costs. (P.C. Verma, J.) 23.7.2008 Prabodh 2