IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2780 of 2007 MANOJ KUMAR SINHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 10 02.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. In terms of the order dated 11.05.2007, a show cause has now been filed along with details of the calculation of arrears in relation to the salary payable to him as per the recommendation of the Sixth Pay Commission that was the primary relief which the petitioner has sought in C.W.J.C. No. 8539 of 2000. However, petitioner submits that this payment may not be enough because he has claim to leave salary and other retiral dues from the opposite parties. This Court categorically records that retiral dues is not part and parcel of the adjudication in the writ application against which the present contempt application has been filed. In so far as the present contempt is concerned, it is brought to the rest. If the petitioner has claims under retiral heads which is payable to him, he has options in this regard to either claim the same and settle it with the opposite parties or on their failure to invoke jurisdiction of an appropriate court. The Contempt Application is dismissed. Rajeev/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)