THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 12015 of 2009 Oral order: The land of the petitioner and some other persons, situated in Sy. No. 126 of Earladinne village, Narva Mandal, Mahbubnagar, was acquired by the respondent No.2 for Priyadarshini Jurala Project, under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and they were paid compensation vide award dated 30.03.1993. As respondent No.2 did not include the structures existing on the land, the brother of the petitioner along with three others filed writ petition in W.P. No. 11879 of 2008 questioning the action of respondent No.2 in not acquiring the structures and not paid compensation in respect thereof. This Court upon considering the stand taken by the respondents in the counter, by order dated 10.07.2008 allowed the said writ petition, with the following directions: Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed with a direction to the respondents to issue supplementary notification or fresh notification including the existing structures on the lands situated in Sy. Nos. 123 and 126 belonging to the petitioners as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Pursuant to the above order, respondent No.2 issued supplementary notification dated 14.05.2009 for acquisition of the structures existing on the land in the said survey numbers by showing the name of the brother of the petitioner. The petitioners state that pursuant to the supplementary notification dated 14.05.2009, issued by respondent No.2, namely the Special Deputy Collector, the Irrigation Department had submitted valuation for the said structures and respondent No.2 has initiated acquisition proceedings and now the matter is at the stage of passing award. The petitioner states as he is entitled to share in the compensation equally along with his four brothers, he made representation dated 09.06.2009 requesting respondent No.2 to pay him the compensation equally along with his four brothers, but till date no action has been taken. The learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition on instructions submitted that the matter is still at the stage of award enquiry, and respondent No.2 will consider the request of the petitioner at the time of passing award. In view of the above stand taken by the learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions: Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the claim made by the petitioner in his representation dated 09.06.2009 as to his entitlement of share in the compensation along with his brothers equally at the time of passing final award, and pass appropriate orders. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 22nd June, 2009. KSR