1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No.8039 of 2009. Ajay Sharma son of Shri Tulsi Ram VERSUS State of Rajasthan and Another Date of Order :::: 05/11/2009 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.S. Chaudhari Mr. Suresh Sahni, and Mr. Kuldeep Sharma, Counsel for the Petitioner Mrs. Rekha Madnani, Dy. Govt. Counsel for the State *** BY THE COURT : Heard learned counsel for the parties. This petition has been preferred by the prisoner- petitioner under Rule 10-A of the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules 1958 for grant of emergent parole on the ground that earlier on account of illness of the father of the petitioner, the petitioner had applied for emergent parole and was granted emergent parole vide order dated 28.11.2008 of the Superintendent, Central Jail, Jaipur. 2 It is submitted by the learned counsel that after passing the order dated 28.11.2008, the respondents cancelled the said order granting emergent parole vide order dated 04.12.2008 on the ground that the bail bonds had not been furnished. Thereafter, the petitioner moved an application on 17.04.2009 for being released on emergent parole, but the same was refused. Hence this petition. During the pendency of this petition, the respondents filed their reply and along with the reply also submitted the report received from the S.H.O. Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur to whom the matter was referred to verify the fact with regard to the illness of the father of the petitioner and whether he requires the treatment as alleged. The aforesaid report dated 28.11.2008 of the S.H.O. Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur stated that while it is correct that Tulsi Ram, the father of the petitioner was admitted to the Santokba Durlabhji Hospital, Jaipur on 24.11.2008 and was discharged subsequently after about 3-4 days. In that view of the matter, we inquired from the learned counsel for the petitioner whether or not the father of the petitioner still was undergoing treatment and was requiring any surgery etc., in that behalf. 3 The petitioner has filed an affidavit of the father on 03.11.2009, wherein it is stated that he has been advised for angiography and if necessary angioplasty and for this purpose, he requires the presence of his son (petitioner). In support of the same, a Photostat copy of the pensionaries diary issued to the father of the petitioner - Tulsi Ram has been annexed, wherein the treating doctor at Bharatpur had advised angiography. The said endorsement is said to be of 16.10.2009. In support of the above, the advise given by Dr. Ashok Jain of the Fortis Escorts Hospital, Jaipur has also been produced before this Court, wherein similar advise for the angiography has been given in support of Tulsi Ram, the father of petitioner, though this is dated 27.07.2009. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, we are inclined to accept this petition and grant seven-days emergent parole to the petitioner. The petitioner be released on seven-days emergent parole under Rule 10-A of the Rules of 1958, upon submitting necessary documents regarding admission of his father for the above treatment, before the Superintendent of Central Jail, Jaipur, who shall immediately thereafter release the petitioner on emergent parole of seven-days for the aforesaid treatment of his father Tulsi Ram, upon furnishing a personal bond for a sum 4 of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only), along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the Superintendent, Central Jail, Jaipur, on usual terms and conditions, as determined by him. The Superintendent, Central Jail, Jaipur shall also fix a date for his surrender before the jail authorities. The writ petition stands allowed with the aforesaid directions. (K.S. Chaudhari), J. (Dalip Singh), J. ashok/