1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) No. 5088 of 2008 Decided on 27.10.2010. Naresh Dutt Sharma ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner : None. For the respondents : Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition has been filed mainly with the following prayers: “i) That the impugned Annexure A-2, dated 6.6.98 may be quashed and set aside; ii) That the respondents may be directed to permit the applicant to discharge the duties of TGT against JBT at Govt. Primary School, Dilman, Block Sarahan, Distt. Sirmour (HP). iii) That the conditions No. 1 & 4 of the agreement entered into between the applicant and the respondent State, vide Annexure A-1 may be quashed and set 2 aside being ultra vires the Constitution of India; iv) That the respondents may also be directed to give revised pay scale of the post of JBT to the applicant with initial start of Rs. 4020 with allowances admissible and arrears of salary for the vacation period with interest @ 18% per annum;” 2. In the reply at para 2, it is stated as under: “2. That the applicant has solicited the relief to the effect in the present application that the respondents be directed to permit the applicant to discharge the duties of TGT against JBT at Govt. Primary School, Dilman, Sarahan Block and the agreement entered into between the applicant and the respondent state at the time of his initial appointment as per annexure A/1 annexed with the application may be quashed and set aside being ultra vires the constitution of India and also the respondent may also be directed to give revised pay scale of the post of JBT with initial start Rs. 4020/- with allowances admissible and arrears of salary for the vacation period.” 3. In case the petitioner has any dispute with respect to the above factual position, it will be open to him to point out the same before the first respondent, in which case the first respondent will consider the matter and take appropriate 3 action in accordance with law within another four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment by the petitioner. 4. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. October 27, 2010. (Justice Kuldip Singh) (HL) Judge.