IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 9555 of 2004 Between: P.Prasanna Kumari, w/o Madhava Rao, r/o Flat No.107, Chalukya Towers, Beside Krupa Anand Hall, Picket, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Deputy Accountant General (Admn.) Office of the Prl.A.G.(AU) I, Saifabad, A.P.,Hyderabad-4. 2 The Divisional Co-op.Officer, Cooperative Societies, Secunderabad Division, at Manoranjan Complex of A.P.,Housing Board, M.4., M.J.Road, Near Exhibition Ground, Hyderabad. 3 Sub-Divisional Co-op.Officer, o/o Divisional Co.op.Officer, Secunderabad-Division, at Manoanjan Complex of A.P.Housing Board M4, Near Exhibition Ground, M.J.Road, Hyderabad. 4 The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Gruhakalpa, Hyderabad. 5 K.G.Satyanarayana, P.I.C., AGOCCS Ltd., A.G.Office, Saifabad, Hyderabad-4. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the second, third, fourth and fifth respondents for including the name of the petitioner in the Inspection report of 3rd respondent and making charges against the petitioner is illegal arbitrary and against to the principles of natural justice and further to direct the respondents number 2 to 5 to delete the name of the petitioner from any charges as per the show cause notice issued on 15-3-2003 on the inspection report of Hasham Ali on the Managing Committee of the Accountant's General Office Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., by deleting her name from all the charges if any Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.T.H.SOWBHAGYA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : ORDER: The learned counsel for petitioner states that the cause in the writ petition does not survive as of now for adjudication and it has become infructuous. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 10.4.2008 DA THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No. 9555 of 2004 10.4.2008