IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 12090 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: May 28, 2010. Sukhdeep Singh @Sukhi and others ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab. ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mrs. Baljit Mann, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG, Punjab. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in FIR No.171 dated 12.11.2009, under Sections 307/506/148/149 IPC and 25/27/54/59 Arms Act, registered at Police Station Kartarpur, District Jalandhar. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioners that no injury has been attributed to the present petitioners and that injury has been attributed to co-accused Kala @Gurdial Singh, who is in custody. It is further contended that petitioners have been continuing in custody since CRM No.M-12090 of 2010 11.02.2010 and that trial is not likely to be concluded in near future as even charges have not been framed in this case. Learned counsel for the State, on instruction from ASI.Kulwant Singh, has not disputed these facts. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant application for regular bail filed on behalf of Sukhdeep Singh @Sukh, Gurpreet Singh @Gopi, Sukhwant Singh @Kalu and Kulwant Singh @Kanta, is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Jalandhar ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) May 28, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2