IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CM No. 14992-93 of 2011 CWP No. 5408 of 1990 Date of decision December 5, 2011 Mrs.Jayshree Kaur ....... Petitioners Versus The New India Assurance Company Ltd. and others ........ Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. N. P. Mittal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate **** K. Kannan, J (oral). CM No. 14992-93 of 2011 1. The order does not require any further clarification, for, a direction that the petitioner shall be treated as having been promoted from the date when his junior was promoted, ought to take notice of all further events that happened subsequent to the filing of the writ petition. When the promotion post fell vacant, it shall be left to the party to take it up appropriately with the authorities and work out the consequences which the order in the writ petition makes possible for the petitioner to claim. 2. With all these observations, the applications are disposed of. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 5, 2011 archana