IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2127 OF 2006 PRADEEP PANDURANG LOKARE ..APPLICANT V/S LALASAHEB BANDU MOHITE & ANR. ..RESPONDENTS SHRI PRATAP PATIL FOR THE APPLICANT. MS. A.T. JHAVERI, APP FOR THE STATE. SHRI S.A. RAJESHIRKE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1. CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 6TH FEBRUARY, 2008. DATE : 6TH FEBRUARY, 2008. DATE : 6TH FEBRUARY, 2008. P.C. 1. Heared learned counsel for the Applicant and Respondents. The Applicant is challenging the Judgment and Order dated 18-3-2006 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Karad, who by his order was pleased to acquit the Respondent/Accused for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Learned counsel for the Applicant invited my attention to the impugned order wherein the trial court has held that the accused had established by adducing cogent evidence that the dishonoured cheque was not issued towards any legally enforceable debt or liability. I have perused the order of the trial court. No case is made out for grant of leave to file appeal. Leave is refused. --- (V.M. KANADE, J) (V.M. KANADE, J) (V.M. KANADE, J)