Ram Sahai AniL Aged about 48 yams, son of Shri Khemraj, werking as Assisiaut, Sub Inspector' (Folics) Department of Police, Police Telecommunication Kawardha, DiStt. Kabwrdham (CG). PiTITLGbIER : VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Chief Secretary, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG): .State of Modhya PradeSIL through the Chief Secretary, Government of Madhva‘ Fradesh, Bhopal. . The Director General of Police? Police Headquarter, Raipur (CG). 4. The Director General of Police. Polioe Headquarter. Bhopal (MP). 5. Central Govermnem (Union of ludia) ihrough Secretary, Deptt. ofHome Affairs. New Delhi. (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CGNSTITI TTION OF INDIA) (SB: Him'ble Mi: Saiisih K. Agii‘iliotri, J.) RESPONDENTS L9 Present : Shri R.K. Keearwani, Advocafe for the petitioner. Shri U.N.S. Dee, Govt. Advocate for the State/rcspondeni No, l & 3. Slui Manish Shanna, Advocate for the responden} No. 5. ORAL ORDER {Passed on 2§“‘ of Felsmaryg 2308) x. l. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he does not Want to press this petition on merit, exoept that the peitionlr he permitted to make a representation to the Connnittee in the light of the judgment ami order aimed 17m i “ril, 2'3 7 passed by this Court in BR. Godbole Vs. Municipal Corporation Ding and otters (2097 (2) CGLJ 417), to which leanied counsel appearing for the rethondents/State have no obj eetion. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in the same terms, i.e., the N Committee so constituted is directed to consider the representations made by the petitioner, if his representations are not considered earlier. In the event, if it is not considered eariier, the fresh representation may be considered, as expeditiously as possible within a period of four months from the date of reeeipt of representation. The representations may be /‘t: J J *V »r vx.» IGE C(SURT OF CEIHATTESGARH AT BELASPU Writ Petition (S‘; N3. 1223 0f23§3 H R m gougidergd kge‘pug 1 gmployeé: £11 (me St @Xarcise an the patt af the GovenmlsIL of -11di period 0f fmzr mamhS v.‘_ uzmd the fafjt of residence and gmsting of the atg and posting 0f the spouse izi afher State. This a may be mmPIeted wiihin a from the date ofmceipt of a capy 0fthis order. Sd/- . Satish K. Agnihotn Judge