IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 24TH JULY 2007 / 2ND SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 29909 of 2005(I) -------------------------- AGAINSt I.A.891/05 IN AS.47/2005 of SUB COURT, QUILANDY .................... PETITIONER: ------------ KALAKANDY AMMAD, S/O.MOIDEEN, STAFF, KAPPAD YATHIM KHANA, THURAYUR AMSOM DESOM, P.O.PAYYOLI, KOYILANDY TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.R.BINDU (SASTHAMANGALAM) RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. KALAKANDY KUNHIAYISHA, D/O.MOIDEEN, IRINGATH AMSOM, DESOM, KOYILANDY TALUK. 2. KALAKANDY AMINA, D/O.MOIDEEN, MEKKILLATHU HOUSE, INRINGATH AMSOM DESOM, KOYILANDY TALUK. 3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MELADI, MELADI AMSOM, DESOM, P.O.MELADI, KOYILANDY TALUK. 4. KALAKANDY PATHUMMA, W/O.LATE MOIDEEN, THURAYUR AMSOM, DESOM, KOYILANDY TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.N.L.KRISHNAMOORTHY SRI.K.LAKSHMINARAYANAN SMT.SATHYA SHREEPRIYA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX EXT. P1 TRUE COPY OF TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE, PAYYOLI IN OS 100/04 DTD.8.6.05. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE, KOYILANDY IN IA 891/05 IN AS 47/05 DTD.6.9.05. [ True copy ] P.A. to Judge. M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.C. NO. 29909 OF 2005 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 24th day of July, 2007. J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed seeking to set aside the order in I.A.891/05 in A.S.47/05. The suit relates to the administration and management of a private aided school. There is a prayer for declaration and consequential injunction. The Court below refused to grant an interim order in the appeal. 2. Now, I am informed that all the parties have entered appearance and the matter has become ripened for hearing. Therefore, in the interest of justice, I direct the Court below to dispose of A.S.47/05 itself in a time frame of three months from today. I also make it clear that the said judgment shall be untrammeled by the observations contained in the impugned order passed by the learned Subordinate Judge. The status quo as on today will continue till the disposal of the appeal. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-