.-l-'u*t<%,. ,| S'MjjJ'8"*^ W^<£h •f^.'y :^%w ;X€N~ t ,T('\ ..^ H1GH COIJRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PET1TIONER WRIT PETITION No. 694 of2004 Gaurava Mangrulkar Ased about 30 vears. S/o Late Shri Narendra Kumar Maiigralkar R/o Pottalwar Bhawan, TUak Nag»r, Chatapara, Bilaspur (Chhattisgat-h). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Principal RESPONDENT8 Admmistration, Mantralaya, DK8 Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgai'h). 2. State of Madhva ft-adesh Through fhe Principal Seeretary, Department of General Administration, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (Madliya Pradesh) 3. Union of India, Through the Secretary Depaitonent/Mimstry of Huniaii Resources and Development New Delhi. PE:rrnONUNDER._AS:nCLE 226 OF THE CONSTriVnON OF INDIA 8B: Hon'Ue SlmSatish K, Agnihotei, J, Present: Shri Jitendra Pali, Advocate fortho petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Dy. Govt Advocate fbrthe State/respwident No.l (Passed oa 20B> day of April, 2009) Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioner, on instructions, submits that wifh the passage oftime, fbis petition has become inlructuous. He seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw this petition wifh liberty to file a fi-esh petition, ifany cause ofaction survives. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. It is ordered. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as witfadrawn witli the above stated liberty. _.___-'- Amit Sd/- ^ . , Satish K. Agnih°w Judge ^A •E