IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.45246 of 2010 RANA MANENDRA SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 21.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Torture for demand of dowry is the allegation followed by assault leading to abortion of the informant by this petitioner. For the same, submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that this much was done earlier to 24.03.2009. Cruel act of petitioner’s if was prohibiting her to inform the incident to the Police, there is assertion in the F.I.R. itself that on 06.05.2009, her father came she was allowed to meet him rather to disclose her all grievances and that was the occasion to justify filing of this case near about after 11 months of Matrimonial Case No. 227 of 2009 by the husband for restitution of conjugal rights. On that point, it is explained that she was residing to her in-laws even Matrimonial Case for restitution of conjugal rights was filed could be additional ground for torture came to the knowledge of the informant on 06.05.2009 after her abortion but even then matter was not informed to the Court, rather F.I.R. is lodged on 03.03.2010 near about 10 months. Now, restitution case is decided ex parte and it appears an explanation on behalf of the informant not to join the company of her husband. Admittedly, at present she is residing with her father. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, 2 prayer of the petitioner for bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Ram Krishna Nagar P.S. Case No. 19 of 2010 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Patna subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)