IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Special Appeal No. 151 of 2009 Vineet Kumar and others .……… Appellants. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others .………. Respondents. Present: Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent Nos. 5 to 19. None for respondent No. 20. Date of decision: 01-04-2010 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the rival parties have made a prayer, that they would be satisfied if the main appeal itself is disposed of with a direction to the learned Single Judge to dispose of Writ Petition (S/S) No. 155 of 2009 on the next date of hearing or thereafter, as expeditiously as possible. In view of the joint request made by the learned counsel for the rival parties, the instant Special Appeal is disposed of with the directions as sought by the learned counsel for the rival parties. Needless to mention, that any appointments made during the interregnum, shall be subject to the final decision of the writ petition. Amit (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 01.04.2010 01.04.2010