vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1333 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.1333 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.1333 OF 2008 Bharat G. Sawant ... Petitioner V/s. Shilpa B. Sawant ... Respondent Mr.Vivek Kantawala for Petitioner Mr.Sayeed Akhtar for Respondent No.1 Mr.G.W. Mattos, AGP, for Resp. No.3 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J MHATRE, J MHATRE, J. DATED: DECEMBER 5, 2008 DECEMBER 5, 2008 DECEMBER 5, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This petition has been adjourned on several occasions. The order challenged in the petition has been passed by the Family Court directing the petitioner to pay interim maintainance @ Rs.4,000/- per month. 2. Several affidavits have been filed in this matter including an affidavit by MHADA which was added as a party respondent in order to ascertain whether the flat in question stands in the name of the petitioner. All these issues would have to be ascertained by the trial Court and not in a writ petition. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. However, the dismissal of the writ petition does not reflect on the correctness or otherwise of the impugned order. The trial Court will decide all issues which arise in the matter uninfluenced : 2 : by the observations in the impugned order. The parties shall file their pleadings before the trial Court within four weeks from today. The trial Court shall dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible. 3. The learned Counsel for the added respondent i.e. Respondent No.3 seeks liberty to take such action as is necessary in accordance with law in view of the pleadings in the affidavit filed by Respondent No.1 on 4.12.2008. Liberty granted. Petition dismissed.