IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.600 OF 2005 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.562 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO.2135 OF 2001 Chandru L. Raheja .... Appellant Vs. S.G. Raheja and others .... Respondents Ms Bindi Dave i/b M/s. Wadia Ghandy & Co. for the Appellant. Sarvasri Janak Dwarkadas with Peri Modi & S.A. Purohit i/b Abhichandani for the Respondent No.1. Shri Pratik Sakseria i/b Ms Sangeeta Langiwar for the Respondent No.6. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & Dr. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ. DATED: DATED: DATED: JANUARY 10, 2007 P.C: P.C: P.C: Heard. In view of the fact that by the impugned order the learned single Judge has merely discharged the Notice of Motion only in relation to prayer clause (a) in the Notice of Motion and, that too, on the ground mentioned in the impugned order, there is no case made out for entertaining the appeal against the impugned order. The appeal, therefore, is rejected. (Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/j7a600.5 sjs/j7a600.5 sjs/j7a600.5