IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13142 of 2007 KAUSHALYA KUMARI W/O HARENDRA PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- CHAPTA, P.S. TISIAUTA, DISTT. VAISHALI. ------ PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR, 3. DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR. 4. S.D.O., VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR, 5. C.D.P.O. JANDAHA, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR, 6. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, JANDAHA. 7. THE MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJAN MAHATHI DHARAMCHANDRA P.S. JANDAHA, DIST. VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR. 8. KUMARI RANI KIRAN WIFE OF SHIVNATH SINGH OF VILLAGE- CHAKATA, P.S. PISIAUTA, DIST. VAISHALI. ----- RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 18.12.2009. Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows:- “(I) For directions to the respondent authority No.5 and 7 to produce the appointment letter whereby the respondent no.8 has been appointed on the post of Angan Bari Sevika in Gram Panchayat Rajya Pahathi Dharamchandra ( Chakata Purvi Tola) and cancel the same. (ii) For further directions to respondent authority to consider the grievance of the petitioner for the appointment for the post of Angan Bari Sevika as the 2 petitioner belongs to reserved category and having red-card holder and the village having maximum population of reserved category whereas the respondent no.8 belongs to general category. (iii) For the further direction to the respondent authority to disposed of representation of the petitioner within time-frame by reasoned and speaking order.” With reference to the aforementioned reliefs, counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner intends to move the Collector of the District by filing a compact representation. In the opinion of this court, recourse chosen by the petitioner seems to be correct inasmuch as the scheme for appointment on the post of Anganbari Sevika itself envisages the redressal of grievance pertaining to selection/appointment on the post of Anganbari Sevika in the first instance by the Collector of the District. That being so, this court would give liberty to the petitioner to file a compact representation which, if filed along with this order, will be disposed within the time 3 limit fixed by the State Government in the Circular dated 10.12.2009 by a reasoned order after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, respondent no. 8 and the representative of concerned gram panchayat. With the aforementioned observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)