C. Rev. (T) No. 100/08 in Rev. 12/2006 13.05.2010 Present: Mr. D. K. Khanna, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vijay Bhatia, Advocate, for the respondent. Mr. D. K. Khanna, learned Counsel for the petitioner has invited my attention to the decision dated 31.8.2009 passed by this court in CWP(T) No. 7401 of 2008, titled as Shamta Kumar versus Himachal Pradesh State Forest Corporation and others. 2. In the instant case review of order dated 8.3.2006 is sought on the ground that petitioner had not completed the requisite period necessarily required for the purposes of awarding the relief. 3. The decision rendered by this Court in Shamta Kumar (supra) is not applicable to the facts of the instant case. 4. While deciding the original application the Court specifically took into account the undisputed fact that the original petitioner had in fact completed ten years of continuous service with 240 days in each calendar year. The order was passed more on the basis of facts which were not disputed. 5. It is further urged that the Court has awarded relief in excess of what was prayed for in the petition. It is always open for the Court to mould the relief in a given circumstance. In any event this cannot be a ground for review. 6. No ground for interference is made out. Review petition is dismissed. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. May 13, 2010 (PK)