1 D.B.Special Appeal(Writ) No.692/07 The State of Raj. & ors. V/s Bajrang Singh 22.7.2008 Hon'ble the Chief Justice Mr.Narayan Roy Hon'ble Mr.Justice Mohammad Rafiq Mr.G.S.Gill, Addl. Advocate General for the appellants. Heard learned counsel for the appellants both in limitation application and also in appeal. Delay in filing this appeal is condoned. By the order impugned, the learned Single Judge of this Court while setting aside the order of termination gave liberty to the respondents to pass order of termination afresh in accordance with law. The writ petitioner initially was terminated on 25.2.1984. However, the suit filed by the petitioner against termination order was dismissed on 21.7.1993. During pendency of the suit, order of termination dated 25.2.1984 however was not given effect to on account of interim order passed by the suit court. After dismissal of the suit, appeal was filed by writ petitioner which was also dismissed and during pendency of appeal, no interim order was passed. After dismissal of appeal, the writ petitioner was formally terminated from services with effect from 19.4.2002. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that since there was no interim order passed by the appellate court and writ petitioner continued in service somehow or other he was not entitled to any back wages and keeping in mind this apprehension, 2 this appeal has been filed. It appears that writ application was disposed of on 5.9.2006 with liberty to the respondents to proceed in the matter afresh in accordance with law, but till date, it is not known to the court as to whether formal order has again been passed by respondents terminating the services of writ petitioner. The question as to whether writ petitioner would be entitled for arrears of salary, back wages etc. would be a question to be seen in case any claim is made by writ petitioner and necessary orders are passed by the State- respondents. At this stage, in view of the liberty given by the writ court, in our opinion, no interference would be required. This appeal accordingly is dismissed. (Mohammad Rafiq)J. (Narayan Roy)C.J. Parmar