IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 28851 of 2008 Between: R. Srinivasa Rao S/o. Tirumul Rao Andhra Pradesh Gurukula Girls School, Nerella Village and Mandal, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The A.P. Residential Education Institutions Society (Regd.) rep. by its Secretary, Gagan Vihar, M.J. Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Principal, Andhra Pradesh Gurukula Girls School, Nerella Village and Mandal, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not passing any orders on the representation dt. 8.12.2008 submitted by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and consequently direct the respondents herein to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization of his post as Attender. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.C.VENKAT YADAV Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following : O R D E R:- When this matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent-A.P. Residential Educational Institutions Society, that the petitioner only on apprehension that the respondents would appoint outsiders without considering his case for absorption on permanent basis, has filed the writ petition, and as of now, no cause of action has arisen for the petitioner to file the writ petition. Since as of now, nobody has been appointed, the petitioner cannot have any grievance, and as such, the present writ petition filed by the petitioner under apprehension is premature, and the same is thus closed. However, if the petitioner’s services are affected/discontinued in any way by the respondents, the petitioner is at liberty to question such action by filing writ petition. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 31st December, 2008 bcj