IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.17619 of 2010 Between: M/s. Royal Fort Hotel, Visakhapatnam. … Petitioner And The Govt., of A.P., rep., by its Principal Secretary, Youth, Advancement, Tourism & Culture (T) Dept., Hyderabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri M.V.J.K. Kumar Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Tourism This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.17619 of 2010 ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction, inertia, indiscipline, lethargic and irresponsible action on the part of the respondents in not considering the representation filed by the petitioner dated 08.12.2009 and 11.06.2010 for alteration or modification of the eligibility certificate issued on 07.11.2009 to avail the incentives for the period of five years from 29.06.2002 to 31.10.2005 to 29.06.2002 to 28.06.2007 as spelt out in G.O.Ms.No.6, Youth, Advancement, Tourism and Culture (T) Department, dated 18.12.1998, G.O.Rt.No.760, Youth, Advancement, Tourism and Culture (T) Department, dated 18.09.2009 as consistently reiterated and reinforced in G.O.Ms.No.14, dated 04.09.2008, as illegal, improper, unjust, unfair without application of mind, violative of Article 166 and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioners, dated 08.12.2009 and 11.06.2010 for issue of modified final eligibility certificate for availing tourism incentives for five years period as enunciated in G.O.Ms.No.6, dated 18.12.1998 within a stipulated period as this Hon’ble Court feels suitable.” At the hearing, it is agreed among the learned counsel for the parties that the issue raised in this Writ Petition is covered by order, dated 31.01.2011, in Writ Petition No.29045 of 2010. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Tourism, on instructions, submitted that the issue is engaging the consideration of the committee constituted by respondent No.1 and that on account of the ongoing agitation, the committee could not meet and take a decision. She further stated that a decision, as directed to be taken by this Court, will be taken within a reasonable time. In the light of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of order, dated 31.01.2011, in Writ Petition No.29045 of 2010 with the direction to the respondents to take a decision within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. As a sequel, WPMP.No.22255 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 08.11.2011 ES