AO.No.122 of 07. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Appeal Against Order No.122 of 2007. [ [ A.C.Chenna Reddy Vs. K. V. Narshimha Reddy and others.] ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri N. D. Thombre, Advocate for the appellant. Coram: A. H. JOSHUI, J. Dated: 28th March 2008. 1. The appellant has challenged the order, which is at page 34, in this appeal by which the appellant has been directed to furnish the Bank guarantee. 2. The foundation for this direction is very well seen in the order. The defendant no.3 has got considerable period on the basis of power of attorney, and he has demonstrated his interest in relation to the amount subject matter of the suit. 3. The Trial Court's observations requiring protecting interest of the AO.No.122 of 07. 2 defendant no.3 are not shown to be erroneous. 4. In these premises, no interference is called for. 5. Appeal is dismissed. 6. Learned Advocate for the appellant prays for expediting the suit. 7. At this moment, this Court is not aware about the exact of volume of pending cases. The appellant is at liberty to move for early hearing of the suit before the Trial Court. 8. If the schedule of Court permits, the suit be heard and decided expeditiously. JUDGE Sbm