CRM.M-16776 of 2009 (O&M) 1 In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. Decided on July 21,2009. Mittar Pal -- Petitioner vs. State of Haryana --Respondent. Present: Mr.Pankaj Bali, Advocate,for the petitioner Mr.Partap Singh,Sr.DAG,Haryana. Mr.Sandeep Goyal,Advocate, for the complainant. Rakesh Kumar Jain, J: This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner in a case FIR No. 345 dated 01.6.2009, registered under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC, at Police Station, City Karnal. In brief, the prosecution version is that the petitioner and his co-accused fabricated documents regarding the ownership of the land in dispute to declare Reshma to be its owner. Similarly, another agreement was forged and fabricated in favour of the petitioner by accused No.1 Om Parkash, which was ante dated. Before coming to this Court, the petitioner had filed an application for anticipatory bail along with Om Parkash son of Krishan Lal, which was dismissed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karnal vide his order dated 5.6.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner himself is a bona fide purchaser as he had CRM.M-16776 of 2009 (O&M) 2 purchased the land from Om Parkash son of Krishan Lal, who is owner of the said land being General Power of Attorney of Smt. Reshma. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, has argued that co-accused Om Parkash son of Krishan Lal who was with the petitioner in the bail application filed before the Court below i.e. Bail application No.168 of 2009, which has been dismissed by Sh. N.P. Dewett, Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Karnal vide his order dated 5.6.2009, had filed Crl. Misc. No.M-16442 of 2009 for anticipatory bail before this Court, which has been dismissed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal vide his order dated 1.7.2009. He further submits that three more cases have been registered against the petitioner i.e. FIR No.609 dated 30.10.2006 under Sections 406, 420 IPC at Police Station City, Karnal; FIR No.312 dated 24.07.2008 under Sections 406, 420, 506, 120 B IPC at Police Station Civil Line, Karnal and FIR No.593 dated 23.10.2006 under Sections 323, 325, 34 IPC at Police Station City, Karnal. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the antecedents of the petitioner, I do not find it to be a fit case to grant concession of anticipatory bail. Hence, the same is hereby dismissed. This shall, however, be not taken as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case before the Trial Court. July 21,2009 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge