(1) CR.APP. 1926.2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1926 OF 2009 1] Dadarao S/o Ambadas Kadam, Age : 23 years, Occu.: Education, R/o Savargaon, Tq. Majalgaon, Dist. Beed 2] Dayanand S/o Jalindar Borade, Age : 23 years, Occu.: Education, R/o as above 3] Manik S/o Baburao Salve, Age : 45 years, Occu.: Labour, R/o As above 4] Sanjay s/o Mahadeo Fande, Age : 23 years, Occu.: Education, R/o As above 5] Bandu S/o Dhondiba Borade, Age : 40 years, Occu.: Labour, R/o As above 6] Gulab S/o Kishor Kuvhare, Age : 42 years, Occu.: Agri., R/o As above .. Applicants Versus 1] The State of Maharashtra through Police Station, Majalgaon, Dist. Beed 2] The Superintendent of Police, Beed, Dist. Beed (Copies to be served on the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad) .. Respondents (2) CR.APP. 1926.2009 Mr. P.M. Gaikwad, Advocate for the Applicants Smt. R.R. Mane, APP for the Respondent-State CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 18TH JULY, 2009 ORAL ORDER:- 1] The applicants are seeking anticipatory bail in crime no.67 of 2009 dated 31.3.2009 under section 395, 506 of the Indian Penal Code of Majalgaon Police Station, Dist. Beed. 2] The complainant alleged that on 30.3.2009 at about 9:45 am the applicants and others entered his shop, beat him up and thereafter, took away mobile phone and cash. One of the companions of the applicants made complaint against the complainant, which was registered as crime no.66 of 2009 of the same Police Station. 3] The present complaint appears to be counter-blast to the complaint filed by the companion of the present applicants. Besides, the narration in the complaint, appears rather concocted. The complainant did not attribute any specific role to the applicants except the applicant Sanjay. Although, the complainant was referred to medical examination and was certified having sustained four simple injuries, I am inclined to (3) CR.APP. 1926.2009 grant anticipatory bail to the present applicants. The incident occurred on 30.3.2009. The applicants are yet not arrested, for they are protected by ad- interim orders of anticipatory bail. The applicants in crime no. 66 of 2009 were also granted anticipatory bail. It seems, although the cause and the incident was of petty nature, both the parties exaggerated the accounts of the incident, so as to harass the opponents. 4] In the event of the applicants’ arrest in this case, they shall be released on bail of Rs.5000/- (Rs.Five Thousand) each with one surety each in the like amount. 5] Criminal Application stands disposed of. Sd/- (A.V. NIRGUDE, J.) arp/18july9/cr1926.09