THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.7314 OF 2006 DATED: 01-02-2007 BETWEEN K. Subba Rao, S/o. K. Guraiah, Occ: School Correspondent, R/o. 21-445, Shamshabad, R.R. District and another. …PETITIONERS AND The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Lakdi-Ka-Pul, Hyderabad and others. …RESPONDENTS ORDER: This writ petition has been ﬁled seeking a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in harassing the petitioners without setting the law into motion and consequently direct them to refrain from summoning them in the interest of justice. 2. It is the case of the petitioners that the ﬁrst petitioner is the father of the second petitioner and the ﬁfth respondent is working as a teacher in the school of the petitioners. It is the stated that the ﬁfth respondent expressed her intention to marry the second petitioner though she is eight years older to him. The said development was informed to the parents of the ﬁfth respondent, upon which she bore grudge and inﬂuenced the police to harass them. Thereafter, the police personnel from Rajahmundry and Sitanagaram Police Station visited the school and residence of the petitioners thrice without any warrant or summons. In fact, the ﬁrst petitioner ﬁled a complaint against the ﬁfth respondent alleging that she had committed theft of gold ornaments and the said complaint was registered as Cr.No.20 of 2006 on the ﬁle of the second respondent police station. 3. Counter has been ﬁled by the third respondent stating that the allegations of the petitioners that they were summoned to the police station due to the pressure exerted by ﬁfth respondent and that the police personnel visited their school and residence are false and the same have been denied. In fact, the case in Cr.No.20 of 2006 registered on the complaint of the petitioners was found to be false after investigation and a ﬁnal report to that eﬀect has also been ﬁled before the concerned Court. It is further stated that the ﬁfth respondent had not ﬁled any complaint against the petitioners, as such the question of taking action and harassing them does not arise. 4. In view of aforesaid counter that the police never summoned the petitioners to the police station and never harassed them and in view of the fact that the complaint of the petitioners had been registered and found to be false no direction can be issued in this writ petition. However, it is always open to the petitioners to take appropriate action against the ﬁnal report ﬁled before the concerned Court. Further, the respondents 3 and 4 cannot interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioners without there being any complaint to the eﬀect that the petitioners have committed a cognizable offence. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with the above observations. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J February 1, 2007 DSK