IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2008 / 21ST JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 12817 of 2008(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ AMEER ALI.A., S/O.ABDUL RAHIMAN.K., 257, CHANDRA NAGAR, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.P.R.VENKETESH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT REPRESENTED BY THE VICE CHANCELLOR, CALICUT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT. BY ADV. SRI. P.C. SASIDHARAN, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 12817 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 11th June, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner complains that grace marks due to him as a sports person have not been properly distributed to his best advantage. The petitioner therefore seeks the following reliefs: “a) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Ext. P12; b) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the first respondent, Vice Chancellor to consider Ext. P10 representation after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner forthwith.” Learned standing counsel for the University submits that the University shall withdraw Ext. P12 and pass fresh orders, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. This is recorded and the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the University to pass fresh orders within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.