^" c^- ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) '.,' W.P.(ClNo.r3^^ Of 2010 PETITIONERS ^' :!)' Deepak Kumar Kashyap, aged about 29 years, S/o. Shri Devnarayan Kashyap, R/o. (Temporary) Chhatrawas, Veterinary ^/ .^^y ^(/Q'^oy .fv^-^ ^y ^- ^,^~ ^ ^^ •Vidyagiri Balak 'Room No.36, Hospital and Husbandry College, Anjora, Durg (Chhattisgarh) Permanent Address - Behind Shyam Talkies, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Pin 495001 Devesh Kumar Giri, S/o. late Shri Ramesh Giri, aged 25 years, R/o. (Temporary) Vidyagiri Balak Chhatrawas, Room No.36, Veterinary Hospital and Husbandry College, Anjora, Durg (Chhattisgarh) Permanent Address - Post & Tahsil Bakaawand, District Bastar, (Chhattisgarh) Pin 494222 RBSPONDENTS :1) / :2) Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Higher Education Department Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalay through its Vice Chancellor, G.E.Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ^ :3) College ofVeterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Anjora, Durg (Chhattisgarh) i WRIT PETITION UNDBRARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA i;|ji" ffl<^€1QttRTt^^Hi$lteS6^^ S.B: Hon?1»te81u^!Pra^h^i^^ W.P.rG^No.334'7/2610 I>ETmO^ERS : Oc^akl^ '..:;tlVersus'll''''::';''1 •;!/:^; ^ ^M8PON®^'TI»^i^!K^?Smte:'of|i€'hhatttee^ .•^^aiSffli^'^^i^;'^''l':':";:l''^l,:"%^^ ^: ^. "'•':1:' ••:' •:\:'rr-f, •• Slm B.B. ^^v^, Sem^ ^ 'cbunsel.^^'petiticmers.;'^^!^;^ Shri ^ay Dwive^^ I^ State.ll:..'.,l..;l\;:;''!:;';.' THE ^Ul^EIl^<^^NI^RARIWLi2^^^^ ..-..^.l%:^|i3©i^ili[ili^!W^^^^ I,®Iii^£)Ri)ER;',.;.-:r';. K®^itiojoy;:i.-;l.-::j,:1..1 Heard on admissioti. Leamedcounselfbrthepetitionerasi^^ the petitioners for^.V.Sc. (Previ<ms '%ar)First^^^^^S^^ Examination has beeri ^ by fhe respQiKteai^^iverstty^^^ w^ 1(''1:'^-'1.':. :':.:-' - petitione^ have^ot bee&made aw^ suchwithholdingoifthefesult. Leamed coutis®lhas made a statement in ^e writ petition andatsoat^barlhat^irrepTesen^^ universitytomfbnnlliem^o^^^t^ the r^l^ is pending. He prays ^ respoadent^yniYen^^ y: ^SSi !l!i ^iiiilliiiilIfjtiSt^tiffiiIiMiil1 m^mi 4. In view of the statement made and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that if the representation are pending^the respondenVuniversity shall decide the representation and inform the petitioners as to the reason for withholding their result ofM.V.Sc. (Previous Year) First Semester Examination. 5. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the university shall decide the representation, if pending, on its own merit and in accordance with the extant mles/regulation. 6. With this direction the petition stands disposed of. It is expected that the university shall decide the representation at the eariiest. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge <^\ <s