Civil Revision No. 2585 of 2010(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2585 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: April 22, 2010 Surjit Singh ...... Petitioner Versus Gurdial Singh and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.Arun Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This petition has been filed against concurrent orders of the Courts below dismissing the application U/O 39 Rule 2-A CPC filed by the petitioner against his father. The petitioner had filed a suit for partition against the respondent and others and in that suit an application Under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC was filed in which the following relief was granted:- “In view of the above discussion, I find no merit in the application regarding relief of alienation of the suit property. However, the parties are directed to maintain status quo regarding demolishing and changing the nature of the property in dispute till disposal of suit or subject to its partition.” Civil Revision No. 2585 of 2010(O&M) 2 Thereafter the petitioner filed the instant application alleging that the respondent had demolished the house in dispute. This assertion was denied by the respondent. After considering the material both the courts found that the petitioner has not been able to establish that the respondent had demolished the property. Learned counsel has not been able to persuade me that these findings have been based on any such material irregularity as to be liable for interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Consequently this petition is dismissed. Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc. Applications, if any, stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE April 22, 2010 sunita Civil Revision No. 2585 of 2010(O&M) 3