IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-46523 of 2007 Date of decision: 12th February, 2009 Bhupesh Kumar … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana … Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. C.B. Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sushma Chopra, Addl. Advocate General Haryana for the State. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) In the present case, report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. was submitted against the petitioner on 10th February, 2007. Copies of the report, along with statement of witness were supplied to the accused on 27th February, 2007. Present petition was filed on 9th July, 2007 and report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. along with statement of witness was not placed on record. However, during the pendency of the petition, charge has been framed against the petitioner on 4th February, 2009. It has been held in ‘Minakshi Bala v. Sudhir Kumar’ 1994 (3) RCR (Crl.) 123 that once the charge has been framed, only revision petition is maintainable and proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. cannot be resorted to. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition. Criminal Misc. No. M-46523 of 2007 As prayed, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise all arguments, available to him under law, before the trial Court at appropriate stage. In case the revision petition is filed, petitioner may raise all arguments before the revisional Court. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE February 12, 2009 rps