1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 55. CA/4484/2009 In FAST/7337/2009 WITH CA/4485/2009 In FAST/7331/2009 WITH CA/4486/2009 In FAST/7340/2009 WITH CA/4487/2009 In FAST/7342/2009 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.S.Salunke, Adv., for the applicants. Mr. V.D.Rakh, AGP, for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:12/1/2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr. Salunke, Counsel for the applicants. Respective claimants feel that the award of the Court in the respective Land References granted by the learned Judge are inadequate. There is delay of 398, 447, 548, 447 days in causing to file the respective 2 appeals. The land holders could not manage to collect the Court fee, they were rather unaware of even passing of the orders, they nursed under a wrong advise and consequently, the delay. The delay should not foreclose the rights which the land holders feel accrued to them due to acquisition of the property and they were less compensated. Delay is condoned. Respective applications allowed. Learned A.G.P. waives service in the appeal. Call for R & P. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/4484-09ca