1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 1944/2008 (Umarkhed Taluka Shetkari Sahakari Ginning and Pressing Society Ltd. VERSUS Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Umarkhed & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Shri M.I. Dhatrak, counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Gawande, counsel for the R-1. Smt. Wandile, Assistant Government Pleader for the R-2 & 3. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : OCTOBER 20, 2008. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The respondent no.1 had directed the petitioner to erect a digital display machine in the Ginning and Pressing Society. The letter was challenged by the petitioner before the Assistant Registrar and since the petitioner was successful before the Assistant Registrar, the respondent Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, Umarkhed preferred a revision before the Divisional Joint Registrar. The Divisional Joint Registrar allowed the revision filed by the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, Umarkhed. The petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar in the instant petition. 2 This Court had, by an order dated 08.09.2008, asked the learned Assistant Government Pleader to point out to the Court the policy showing as to who should install the digital machine, the society or the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, Umarkhed. The Director of Marketing has issued a circular dated 20.09.2008 stating therein that it would be the primary responsibility of the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, Umarkhed to install the digital weighing machine. In view of the circular issued by the Director of Marketing on 20.09.2008, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. The prayer made in the petition and the challenge made by the petitioner to the letter issued by the respondent no.1 on 06.09.2006 has been rendered infructuous. The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of as such. JUDGE APTE