IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4124 OF 2009 The Maharashtra State Co­op. Housing Finance Corporation Ltd. ...Petitioner Versus The Collector & Dist. Election Officer, Mumbai Suburban District ...Respondent. Mr. N.N. Bhadrashete for the Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Rajagopal with Mr. Malar Manoharan i/by Mrs. Rekha Rajagopal for the Respondent. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE: APRIL 22, 2009 P.C.:­ The petitioner­Society is aggrieved of the communication from the respondent, directing it to make available the services of 77 employees out of its total 93 employees. 2. After hearing both learned counsel for the parties, we dispose of the matter, with their agreement, that the petitioner shall make available 40% of its employees to the respondent for being deputed to election duties. The persons and officers shall be of the choice of the respondent, but shall be decided at a joint meeting of the respondent and the petitioner. BILAL NAZKI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.