IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 10TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 19TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 27487 of 2011(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- B. PRASANNAN, S/O. BHASKARAN, MALAYUDEVADAKKETHIL HOUSE, THEGAMUM MURI, PALLICKAL VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.MADHUSOODHANAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT PIN 691523. 2. TAHASILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, REVENUE TOWERS, ADOOR, PIN 689645. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED SHAH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.27487/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT-P1- TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF A.E HARBOUR ENGINEERING SECTION II AZHEEKKAL KARUNAGAPALLY ADDRESSED TO DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DATED 18/03/2010. EXHIBIT-P2- TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 13/08/2010 DISTRICT COLLECTOR. EXHIBIT-P3- TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 30/05/2011. EXHIBIT-P4- TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 09/06/2011. EXHIBIT P5- PHOTOCOPY OF HE AUTHORIZATION LETTER DATED 22.9.2010 OF SAID BHASKARAN SUBMITTED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P6- PHOTOCOPY OF APPLICATIONDATED 3.10.11 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 27487 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 10th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Exts.P2, P3 and P4 are the proceedings issued by the 1st and 2nd respondent respectively for the transportation of red earth from Pallickal Village in Pathanamthitta District to Alappuzha District. However, the transportation permits were not issued, as a result of which, the materials could not be transported on the strength of the aforesaid proceedings. 2. According to the petitioner, who is stated to be the agent of the permit holder, the permit holder has also submitted Ext.P6 application before the 2nd respondent along with Ext.P5 authorisation in his favour. Orders have not been passed on Ext.P6 and that is presently the complaint in the writ petition. 3. Taking note of the pendency of the request made by the permit holder as per Ext.P6 and without expressing anything on the merits, I direct the 2nd respondent to pass orders on Ext.P6 in the light of Exts.P2 to P5. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within two weeks of production of a copy of WPC No. 27487/11 :2 : this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp