IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9188 of 2010 1. DR. DINESH PRASAD SINHA, S/O LATE MANOKAMNA PRASAD SINHA, R/O MOHALLA MAHADEVA ROAD, MAHAJAN TOLI NO. 1, POLICE STATION ARA TOWN ,DISTRICT BHOJPUR. 2. RAJ KISHORE PRASAD, S/O LATE CHANDESHWAR PRASAD, R/O VILLAGE BISAI BIGHA, P.S.-AUNGARI, DISTRICT NALANDA. 3. SIYA RAM SINGH, S/O LATE KAPOOR SINGH, R/O VILLAGE MAJHARIA, P.S. INDUSTRIAL AREA,DISTRICT- BUXAR. 4. BIRENDRA SINGH, S/O LATE RAM LAL SINGH, R/O VILLAGE MAJHARIA, P.S. INDUSTRIAL AREA,DISTRICT- BUXAR. 5. INDRADEO DUBEY, S/O LATE SANT DUBEY, R/O VILLAGE CHANDA, P.S. BRAHMPUR, DISTRICT-BUXAR. 6. RAJENDRA PRASAD CHAURASIYA, S/O RAM CHANDRA PRASAD CHAURASIYA, R/O VILLAGE BHARTIGANJ, P.S. SASARAM (T), DISTRICT- ROHTAS. 7. JOKHAN RAM , S/O LATE JHULAI RAM, R/O VILLAGE SHEOPAR,POST OFFICE SIKARIA, P.S. DARIGAON,DISTRICT- ROHTAS. 8. CHANDRA MAULESH KUMAR, S/O LATE SADHU SHARAN SINGH, R/O MOHALLA PROFESSOR COLONY WARD NO. 4, P.S. BHABHUA (T), DISTRICT-KAIMUR. 9. CHANDESHWAR PRASAD SINGH, S/O LATE SHEO DAYAL SINGH, R/O MOHALLA NAWADA, P.S- ARA NAWADA,DISTRICT- BHOJPUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. SECRETARY,HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,GOVT. OF BIHAR,PATNA. 3. JOINT SECRETARY,HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,GOVT. OF BIHAR,PATNA. 4. DIRECTOR, HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 5. VEER KUNWAR SINGH UNIVERSITY , ARA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR. 6. VICE CHANCELLOR, VEER KUNWAR SINGH UNIVERSITY ,ARA . 7. REGISTRAR,VEER KUNWAR SINGH UNIVERSITY,ARA . ----------- For the petitioners : Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma. For the State : Mr. Ram Narayan, AC to SC XXIII. For the University : M/s. Ajay Behari Sinha and Sajal Kumar Sinha. ______ 02. 11.2.2011 The issue relates to re-designation on the post of Laboratory Incharge, Laboratory Assistant, Lab Technician etc. It takes them out to 2 the ambit to their prejudice vis-à-vis a demonstrator. The issue and the submissions made by the learned senior counsel for the petitioners at the bar is fully answered or covered by a batch of writ applications which came to be decided by the learned single Judge on 21.9.2010, which was the case of Laliteshwar Mishra “Lalitesh” and other analogous cases namely, CWJC No. 1377 of 2010 etc. After going into various ambits of the dispute the Court had very clearly recorded in the following terms: “Before parting, I would like to clarify that this Court, having settled the law in this regard, it would apply to all Universities governed by Bihar State Universities act, 1976 without any individual discrimination. “ If that is even recorded by the learned single Judge in adjudicating the dispute, there is no reason why the petitioners have been discriminated or not given the benefit which they are looking for as such. The writ application is allowed in terms of the decision rendered in the case of Laliteshwar Mishra “Lalitesh” (supra). The case of the petitioners will be considered and all the benefits will accrue in their favour in the light of the said decision. A copy of the order rendered in the case of Laliteshwar Mishra “Lalitesh” is placed on record for ready reference. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)