CWP no.6233 of 2011 Soni Verma vs. State of Haryana and others Present:- Mr.Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana The grievance of the petitioner is that only the marks of 10+2 should have been considered in accordance with the eligibility condition which prescribed 45% as the said eligibility but the respondents have resorted to a criteria which was not prescribed in the prospectus by insisting on separate marks obtained in various disciplines of 10+2. The respondents have produced the prospectus before this Court in which it has been clearly mentioned that the marks obtained shall be considered discipline wise in the examination of 10+2 in the streams of Arts, Science, Commerce and Economics and that the merit shall be prepared on the basis of such marks. In view of the aforesaid, when there is clear stipulation in the prospectus, the instant petition is held to be mis-placed and is the same is hereby dismissed. June 3, 2011 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge