IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 8TH ASWINA 1930 RP.No. 949 of 2008() -------------------- ( IN C.R.P. NO.1572/1995) REVIEW PETITIONER(S): 3RD RESPONDENT ------------------------------------ K. CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR, S/O. SANKARA PILLAI, VETTENTHIYIL PUTHEN VEEDU, THAMARAKUDY, KOTTARAKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANILAL RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS 1, 2, 5 AND THE REV. PETITIONER ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. SURENDRA PILLAI, KOOPARAKIZHAKKETHU VEEDU, KALAYAPURAM, MYLOM, KOTTARAKKARA. 2. RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI, SANKARAMANGALATHU VEEDU, THAMARAKUDY, KOTTARAKKARA. 3. TALUK LAND BOARD, KOTTARAKKARA. 4. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. TAHSILDAR, KOTTARAKKARA. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,J. ------------------------ C.M.APPLN.830/2008 & R.P. NO.949/2008 IN C.R.P.No. 1572/1995 ------------------------ Dated this the 30th day of September, 2008 O R D E R I do not find any valid grounds made out by the petitioner for condoning the inordinate delay, which has been caused in the matter of filing the review petition. Moreover, it is brought to my notice by Sri.K.K.John that R.P. No.947/2008 filed by the third respondent in C.R.P. No.48/1997, a case which was disposed of along with C.R.P. NO.1572/1995, the present case was dismissed. A copy of the order in the R.P. No.947/2008 is placed before me. The impugned common order has thus attained finality, having been reiterated twice by this court. I do not find any infirmity about my order warranting invocation of the jurisdiction for review. The I.A. as well as R.P. fails and they will stand dismissed. (PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE) dpk