IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5312 of 2011 PRAMOD KUMAR SINHA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 02. 11.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the writ application has now become infructuous, but urges that at least the authority should be directed in future to decide any such application well in time and not to render it infructuous by delayed action, in view of the statements made in the counter affidavit. There is no occasion for this Court to make any pious observations at this stage. But if the respondents are of the opinion that matters were unduly delayed in decision making, it is expected that they shall keep it in mind in future. The application is disposed as infructuous. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)