The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.7086 of 2010 Dated 30th March, 2010 Between: Vodapally Mahender …Petitioner And 1.The Government of Andhra Pradesh and 5 others …Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms.Vanga Anitha for Mr.Challa Srinivasa Reddy Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 5: AGP for Home Counsel for Respondent No.6: ---- The Court made the following: Order: Respondent No.6 is the divorced wife of the petitioner. The petitioner’s grievance is that at the instance of respondent No.6, respondent Nos.3 to 5 have been summoning him to the Police Station by sending constables apart from telephoning him to settle the disputes between him and respondent no.6 by threatening that if he does not do so, drastic action will be taken against him. I have heard Smt.Vanga Anitha, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and perused the record. Though the petitioner has impleaded the Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda District, as respondent No.2, it is not his pleaded case that he has approached respondent No.2 with the complaint against his sub-ordinates, if they have been unduly interfering with his life and personal liberty. The petitioner also failed to give any notice to respondent Nos.3 to 5 to refrain from committing the said alleged illegality. Being the superior officer, it will be the responsibility of respondent No.2 to regulate the conduct of his sub-ordinates and ensure that they will not violate the individuals freedom and personal liberty except otherwise than by following due process of law. In this view of the matter, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to respondent No.2. If the allegations contained in the representation disclose commission of acts of undue interference by respondent Nos.3 to 5 with the life and personal liberty of the petitioner, respondent No.2 shall take appropriate action. Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.9156 of 2010, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________ C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J Dated 30th March, 2010 lur