IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 26696 of 2007 Between: M. Sujitha, W/o. M.Deshmanth, R/o. 5-3-112/4, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, R.R.District. ..... PETITIONER AND The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Kukatpally Circle, Rep by its Deputy Commissioner, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, R.R.District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, order or direction directing the Respondent Corporation or it's officials, subordinates or any one claming under it not to demolish and not to interfere and cause obstruction' to the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the schedule property i.e. the house bearing No. 12-6-2/270/1 (old No. 6-2-206/B) on plot No. 10, in Sy.No. 577, situated at Kukatpally Village an Circle, GHMC, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and further direct to regularize schedule property and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.NUTHALAPATI RAJA SEKHARAM (Not Present) Counsel for the Respondents.: SMT.KALPANA EKBOTE The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition was listed for admission on 30-04-2009. As there was no representation for the petitioner, the matter was posted for dismissal. Today, although the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 01-05-2009 ks/ktl