1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition no. 4774 of 2011 Shri Narhari Shyamraoji Supare and another. Vs. Maroti Amruta Kharat and another. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A.V. Bhide, Adv. for the petitioners. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK J. DATE : 3 rd October, 2011. Heard. There is absolutely no error in the impugned order passed by the trial court on 17.8.2011 allowing an application filed by the plaintiff for amendment of the plaint. I have gone through the application filed by the plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The proposed amendment is extremely necessary for effectively deciding the controversy between the parties, more so when the original defendant nos. 5 & 6/petitioners have been joined as parties to the suit. The proposed amendment neither changed the nature of the suit nor the application for amendment was filed belatedly after the commencement of the trial. In such circumstances, the trial court was perfectly justified in allowing the amendment application. The trial court has for cogent and convincing reasons allowed the amendment application by the impugned order dated 17.8.2011 and the impugned order calls for no interference in exercise of the writ jurisdiction. The judgment reported in 2011(4) Mah.L.J. Page 137 and relied on by the learned counsel for the 2 petitioner has no application to the issue involved in this writ petition as the said decision touches the merits of the proposed amendment. Hence, for the reasons aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE Hirekhan