1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANTABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2270 OF 2009 AND Santosh s/o Shankarrao Kadam and others. ..Applicants. V E R S U S The State of Maharashtra. ...Respondent CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2341 OF 2009 Viru @ Virendra s/o Sopanrao Kanoji ...Applicant. V E R S U S The State of Maharashtra. Shri A.I. Deshmukh, and G.G. Kadam, Advocate for applicants. Shri P.M. Shinde, APP for respondent – State. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 21ST JULY, 2009. PER COURT :- 1. Heard respective counsel, seeking prearrest bail of the accused- applicant Santosh Shankarrao Kadam and Viru @ Virendra s/o Sopanrao Kanoji. 2- During the course of submission, it was indicated that the characteristics of complainant Ravi are not as good as it projected. At least a dozen of cases are pending and he is in the process of being extaned by the police. 3- The nature of accusations in crime no.166/2009 indicate assault with deadly weapon giving rise to offence under section 307, 143, 147, 148, 149, 504, of Indian Penal Code r.w. Section 4 and 25 of the Arms Act registered with Bhagyanagar Police Station, Nanded. 2 4- Injury certificate produced by the prosecution demonstrate that Ravi was examined by the Medical Officer on 09.06.2009 at 1.40 p.m, he has sustained three C.L.W and a fracture at ulna and ulna and the injury which was grievous in nature caused due to hard and blunt weapon. The contention that somebody may have, assaulted and the accused is falsely implicated is difficult to accept at this stage. Consequently no merits in the applications. They are rejected. 5- Needless to add, the learned court seized with the matter, will independently decide applications, if moved by the accused. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. ) **** aaa/2270.09&2341.09