iIISRI c aSiS's?.- VSW ^y o ^.\00( IN THE HIGH COURT QF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH PETITIONER ^••'v' \0<^^ ^w-t- ^. l^"' ,f- W.P.(S)No.V^' /2007 Smt. Rewati Bai, W/0. Sanjay Kumar Kewat, aged about: 31 years, R/0. Village : Rampur, Tahsil: Kartala, Distt. : Korba (C.G.) VERSUS ./ i iK £ u ^ tfc w -ie1. ^ ^ 'm s.F% l<,— E.^__ RESPONDENTS <ff—g)/—q'B ?T-" TT°y~3i^ ^"! '^^y^' IXd'--^—!^'L~>..^ '"" -^ .»/aT -61^^ Gt.^Ard) ft. G. 8!L »£»<•!»* State of Chhattisgarh; Through: The Secretary, Mahila Avam Bal Vikas Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) ^^.. ^3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kartala, Distt. Korba (C.G.) 4. The Project Officer, Ekikrit BalVikas F'ariyojna, Kartala, Distt. Korba (C.G.) ^5. Smt.Sharda Bai, W/0. Jawahar Lal, Aged about: 30 years, R/0. Village : Rampur, Tahsil: Kartala, Distt. Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner HI6H COURT OF CHHATTES6ARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 84ijof 2007 Petitioner Smt. Rewoti Bai Versus Respondents State of ChhattiS9arh & others Sirgle Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. ^gnihotri. Present; Mr. P.K. Potel, Advocate for the petitioner'. Mr. Sushi! Dubey, Sover-nment Advocate for the State. ^ OR&ES (Passed wi 13" bay ef FAruary, 2007) The following or-der of the Court was passed by Satish K. ^niho'Sri, J. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner submits that the appointment of respondent No. 5 is contrary to Aanganbsdi Schame, as respondent No. 5 is not tivin9 below the poverty line. Learned counsel appear'ing for ths petitioner further submits that the petitioner- is livin9 beiow the poverty line (BPL), as such •the petitioner has preferenticl clsim over respondent No. 5 for appointment as Aangonbadi Karyakarta/Sahmika. 2. Be thct as it ffloy, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Coliector Kor-ba/respondent No. 2 is directed to look into the allegation nnade by the petitioner cnd ptiss appropriate orde- in accordanca with Aangcnbadi Scheme and !dw. 3. The writ petition \S accordingly disposed of. No order ss to costs. Subhash Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge