IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.2775 of 2011 Date of Decision. 18.07.2011 Jarnail Dyeing House, E-679, Focal Point, Phase VIII, Ludhiana through its Partner ......Petitioner Versus The Punjab State Power Corporation Limited, The Mall, Patiala through its Chairperson and another .....Respondents Present: Mr. J.S. Jaidka, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that amount of penalty, which has been subject of dispute, has already been paid and the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 18, 2011 Pankaj*