IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH OCTOBER 2010 / 28TH ASWINA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 848 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.4726/2006 Dated 04/07/2008 .................... PETITIONER: --------------- E.M.PARAMESWARAN, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.E.M.KRISHNAN NAMBOODIRIPPAD (LATE), EDAMANA MANA, P.O.PUNCHAPADOM, VIA. KADAMPUZHIPURAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAMESH BABU RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. K.P.OUSEPH, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, CUSTODIAN, ECOLOGICALLY FRAGILE LAND AND CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SASIDHARAN, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS (EASTERN CIRCLE), OLAVAKKODE, PALAKKAD DT. BY SPL. G.P.(FOREST) SRI.P.M.POULOSE THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... C.O.C. No.848 of 2010 .................................................................... Dated this the 20th day of October, 2010. JUDGMENT Government Pleader has produced copy of the proceeding conveying the property to the petitioner by the Forest Department. Counsel for the petitioner raised objection about the last paragraph of the proceedings of the Divisional Forest Officer issued on 19.10.2010 stating that the conditions stated therein against enjoyment of the property are without any authority. I do not think there is any scope for considering the validity of the conditions stated in the proceeding in this Contempt application. Since possession is restored, the petitioner is free to contest the order on conditions either in appeal or before this court. Contempt is closed with the above observation. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms