IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 29397 of 2011(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. TOMCY SCARIA, B.TECH STUDENT, SAINT GITS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, PATHAMUTT, RESIDING AT PALLATHUSERIL, IRIMPANAM P.O., TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM. 2. ANOOP.M., B.TECH STUDENT, SAINT GITS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, PATHAMUTT, RESIDING AT ARAMATH HOUSE, KAKKANAD (W) P.O., COCHIN - 30. 3. ABILASH.P.SKARIAH, B.TECH STUDENT, SAINT GITS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, PATHAMUTT, RESIDING AT PODIMATTATHIL HOUSE, PAYYAPPADY P.O., PUTHUPPALLY, KOTTAYAM - 686 034. 4. NIJU THOMAS, B.TECH STUDENT, SAINT GITS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, PATHAMUTT, RESIDING AT MURINGAKALAYIL HOUSE, THOTTAMON, RANNI P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 672. BY ADV. SRI.R.AZAD BABU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, OFFICE OF THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. 2. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. SC SRI.T.A.SHAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 29397 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1 SERIES TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS. EXT.P2 SERIES TRUE COPIES OF THE PAY IN SLIPS IN RESPECT OF REMITTANCE MADE BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P3- TRUE COPIES OF HALL TICKETS OF THE PETITIONERS. (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).29397/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 4th day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of their answer scripts of the B.Tech Degree Examination covered by Ext.P1 series applications and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs