R.S.A No. 835 of 2008 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A No. 835 of 2008 Date of decision : September 23, 2009 District Controller, Food Civil Supplies & Consumer Affairs, Faridkot ...... Appellant (s) v. Anup Singh, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. N.S.Virk, Addl. A.G Punjab for the appellant. Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate for the respondent. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This appeal has been filed against concurrent judgments of the Courts below dismissing the suit of the appellant for recovery on account of damages allegedly caused. Both the Courts below have found that the appellant was not able to establish that the loss was caused by the respondent. The following question has been proposed :- “ Whether the appellant/department is not liable to recovery the less amount from the respondent which is R.S.A No. 835 of 2008 ::2:: loss caused by the respondent ?” It would be seen that the question proposed is a pure question of fact. Counsel for the appellant has not been able to persuade me that the findings recorded thereon are either based on no evidence or are based on such misreading of evidence as would render the same perverse. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. ( AJAY TEWARI ) September 23, 2009. JUDGE `kk'