Crl. Misc. No.M-7698 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-7698 of 2011 Date of Decision: 16.03.2011 Gurdev Singh ....Petitioner Versus Union Territory and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. V.K. Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of FIR No.91 dated 06.03.2010 under Sections 406, 498-A IPC registered at Police Station Sector 39, Chandigarh pursuant to a false complaint dated 19.05.2009 filed by respondent No.3 against the petitioner. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Sukant Gupta, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent-U.T., Chandigarh. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to supply two copies of the petition to learned counsel for the respondent-U.T., Chandigarh during the course of the day. The petitioner had earlier filed Crl. Misc. No.M-37844 of 2010 Crl. Misc. No.M-7698 of 2011 2 which was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 23.12.2010 while holding as under :- “ Disposed of as pre-mature with liberty to the petitioner to approach this court again in case the prosecution agency opts to present challan against him on the basis of alleged material available against him. In case, no decision is taken by the prosecution agency either to file cancellation report or challan, it will be open to the petitioner to approach this court again.” It is pointed out that till date, the prosecution agency has not filed the cancellation report or challan. However, the earlier order was passed only on 23.12.2010 and the present petition has been filed after a gap of three months only. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Investigating Agency to investigate the matter and submit its final report as expeditiously as possible preferably within two months from the receipt of a copy of this order. However, in case, the final report, either way, is still not submitted before the concerned Court within the stipulated period, the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach this Court. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 16.03.2011 JUDGE gurpreet