IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 11125 of 2008. Decided on: 22 nd December, 2010. Dr. Anil Malhotra. …Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Himachal Pradesh. …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No ________________________________________________________ __ For the petitioner. : Mr. R.S. Gautam, Advocate. For the respondent. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. R.S. Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 22, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No