J:-^ IN TH2 HIGH COURT OF JUDIC^TURE AT BILASPUR (C.G) Writ^^etition Np. -j ^ 7 "ZlOOl Petitioner Respondentsi v M/s- M»R»TradingCompany through its Proprietor Narayan Kumar Goel, Geetam Road^ Jagdalpur (Bastar) • -vs- !• The State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Cormnercial Tax ^M^"" -•^y ^^. .-4>rw' 2. Additional Commissioner of Cornrnercial Tax, Raipur^ Chhattisgarh 3» Assistant Commissioner of Coramercial Tax^ Raipur^ ChhattiSQarh» 4» Colleator^ Jagdalpur, (Bastar)» Chhattisgarh ^RIT PKC.ITIQN m®ERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITIIPION 05* II^DIA FOR ISSUANCE OF &PPROPRIATE WRITyWRITS, ORDER, DIRECTIOH ETC, XI-HC-22 ^]^T'^[ '^?W^T[^T '^'RN'^rft^T s/- ^^^TraM^, ^tTFR, W,P»No«1579/2001, Wqw^Tt^'"""""""""""'""""^""^^ 200 '^•^ST' ^TI^T-^RfT^R Trf^ 3.9.20pl. Heard Shri Ranbir sin filed Caveat petltion No< Sa^jay Caveat 1s discharged* After hearing Shrl counsel for the petitioner at some length^ I arn of th^ petxtions are pending be fair and just that I dJ examlne those revision pet petitioner on merit after i of iasmK±Hg being heard to befoit*e K^Agrawal,learned as well as Shri Ranbtr Singh view that since revision the respondent No.2, it would Lrect fche respondent No<2 to ^.tions preferred by the writ .ffording adequate opportunity the writ petitioner^ .in the-result, this the direction that the dispose of the revision 63/RYP/2000.C and 82/RYP/2 petitioner on merit as ear within a period of two mon of fehis order^ Until the no coercive steps shall be If the petitioaer is passed by the respondent liberty to approach this C<»G» as per rules^ 'WTf^pN 'RTR^if ^ 1^T^' '^R$H ^ ^Tf^n 3TT^T ^h» Govt^Adv^ for Caveator^ 1.71/2001. (D( p^tition is disposed of with ss^ondent No•2 sha11 examine and p^titions Nos. 115/RYP/2000, )00/ET filed by the writ Ly as possible preferably ^hs from the date of receipt r^visiosi petitioxis are disposed of, [taken against the petitioner^ ggrieved by the order to be »2^ the petitioner is at N(J? Cc?urt< / Sd/- Chief Justice [Tft^^fef^ '^ ,w^'f