VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 15 OF 2002 Prabhakar M. Kondhalkar & Ors. Petitioners Vs. Pune Municipal Corporation, Shivaji Nagar, Pune Respondents and Ors. None for Petitioner. Mr. R. G. Ketkar, for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI, AND A. P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATE : APRIL 16, 2008. PC :- . The petition had been filed in the year 2002, seekin direction to respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to make good the deficiency of the budget of the respondent No.3 in terms of Section 95A of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corpratin Act. Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 submits that the government has already passed an order on 19th April 2007 merging of respondent No. 3 to Pimpari Chinchawad Municipal Corporation. Since there is a merger of respondent No.3 with another Corporation, it is not known whether they still need any financial - 2 - assistance from respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and therefore, prima-facie respondent Nos. 1 and 2 do not have any liability under section 95A of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act. Therefore, this writ petition appears to have become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- [ BILAL NAZKI, J. ] Sd/- [ A. P.BHANGALE, J.]