Civil Revision No. 3047 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3047 of 2011 Date of Decision: 21.7.2011 *** Surinder .. Petitioner Vs. Roshan & Ors. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. R.S. Madan, Advocate for the petitioner. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The petitioner-plaintiff has filed the present civil revision against the orders dated 21.3.2011 and 20.4.2011 passed by the learned trial Court as well as appellate Court below, refusing to grant temporary injunction in his favour. Heard. It is apparent from records that the plaintiff claimed the BARA in dispute as his ownership and in possession since the time of his forefathers. But no record of proof, worth of any credence, was brought by him on record in support of his above-said assertion. Even he did not plead that the said BARA falls in khasra No.138, upon which a Muslim Chopal was going to be constructed by the Panchayat for public use. Finding that the necessary ingredients for grant of temporary are missing, the learned Courts below dismissed the impugned application. Moreover, the construction raised at the site is subject to risks and costs of defendant No.4 and it has specifically been observed that the plaintiff shall be entitled to the vacant possession of the land, in case he ultimately succeeded in the suit There is no illegality or perversity in the impugned order. The revision petition, being without merit, is accordingly dismissed. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE July 21, 2011 Jiten