Cri.Rev.No.949 of 2011 14.12.2011. Shri Manoj Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri L.L. Sharma, learned GA for respondent/ State . With consent, arguments heard on merits. Petitioners have been sentenced to fine of Rs.500/- for offence under Section 341 IPC and in default one month S.I.and sentenced to R.I.for 1 ½ years with fine of Rs.3,500/- for offence under Section 326/34 of IPC. The 1st appellate court has also dismissed the appeal. The petitioners have come up in revision. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners are not previous convicts. No special reasons have been assigned by both the courts below as to why the benefit of probation of offenders Act is not applicable to the present case. Petitioners have already undergone the jail sentence of 8 months and 12 days. I have heard the learned GA appearing for respondent/ State. Taking into consideration the provisions of sec.360 and 361 of Cr.P.C., it is apparent that the sentence awarded to the petitioners was not justified. In the present matter, it would be proper to reduce the sentence to the period already undergone by the petitioners and to increase the sentence of fine. Consequently, the revision is disposed of with the modification to the extent that the sentence awarded to the petitioners is reduced to the period already undergone and increase the fine amount to Rs.10,000/-, as compensation, to be paid to the victim. The petitioners shall be released subject to depositing the fine of Rs.10,000/-, in the Trial Court within two weeks. Their bail bonds shall be discharged only after depositing the fine amount. With the aforesaid modification, the revision is disposed of. ( M. C. Garg, J. ) RJ/