THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.21743 of 2011 ORDER: Heard Sri P.V. Ramana, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Learned Government Pleader for Revenue (Telangana Area), and Sri M. Rajamalla Reddy, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.3 to 5. The grievance of the petitioner, in this Writ Petition, is regarding the failure on the part of the 2nd respondent in deciding the petitioner’s appeal preferred against the order of the 1st respondent dated 15.12.2010. While several contentions are urged on merits both by Sri P.V. Ramana, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, and to the contrary by Sri M. Rajamalla Reddy, Learned Counsel for respondents 3 to 5, it is wholly unnecessary for this Court to examine any of them, since the petitioner has already invoked the jurisdiction of the 2nd respondent against the order passed by the 1st respondent. Sri M. Rajamalla Reddy, Learned Counsel would fairly state that respondents 3 to 5 would not press for vacation of the interim order of injunction, passed by the Special Assistant Agent, Mobile Court, Bhadrachalam in I.A. No.90 of 2011 in O.S. No.116 of 2011 dated 14.07.2011, for a period of three weeks. The interest of the petitioner would be protected if the 2nd respondent is directed to dispose of either the stay application or the appeal itself within a period of two weeks from today. There shall be a direction accordingly. It is open to both parties to raise all such contentions as are available to them before the 2nd respondent, who shall consider the same in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs. ___________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J 02.08.2011 Note: Issue operative portion by wire at party’s costs. B/o MRKR