IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 3485 of 2010 Date of Decision: 26.2.2010. Satish Kumar --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. D.S. Nain, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) The petitioner is aggrieved of the order dated 23.5.2008, whereby the petitioner who was a Guest Teacher on the post of S.S. Teacher was relieved being not fulfilling the eligibility criteria at the time of his appointment. Vide the aforesaid order disciplinary action has also been recommended against the Lecturer, who appointed the petitioner. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that some other teachers, who were not possessed of the subject combinations were also appointed in the same manner and for that reference is made to Annexures P-4 & P-5, which is an information obtained by the petitioner under RTI Act. It is not disputed that the petitioner was ineligible at the time of appointment. Merely that some other teachers were appointed in the same manner does not given any right to the petitioner to challenge the impugned order. Article 14 is a positive concept and no relief can be granted on the basis of a wrong order. No merit, petition dismissed. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 26.2.2010. lucky