CRM No. M-20430 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. M-20430 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.8.2009 Anil Sharma ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Sudhir Paruthi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab. Rajan Gupta, J. This is a prayer for anticipatory bail in a case registered against the petitioner under Sections 420 and 120-B IPC at Police Station Sadar Rajpura, District Patiala, vide FIR No.129 dated 20th June, 2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that earlier a complaint was lodged in Police Station Fatehgarh Sahib, wherein name of the petitioner did not figure. According to the counsel, no role has been attributed to the petitioner and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the State (on the instructions from ASI Hari Singh, who is present in Court), on the other hand, has submitted that the State has no knowledge of the complaint, Annexure P-1, allegedly submitted to Senior Superintendent of Police, Fatehgarh CRM No. M-20430 of 2009 2 Sahib. He further submits that the petitioner is the main accused in this case and has taken Rs.8.00 lacs with the promise of sending Gurjit Singh and Surjit Singh abroad. According to the State counsel, the petitioner is involved in another case, registered at Police Station Khamanu. Keeping in view the fact that allegations in the FIR are serious, which may require custodial interrogation of the petitioner, there is no ground to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE August 10, 2009 'rajpal'