IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11630 of 2010 SUNAINA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29.4.2010 Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution for offences under sections 304 (B), 120 (B), 201 of the I.P.C. the petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased and is alleged to have committed the crime in question in conspiracy with co-accused , namely, Dharmendra Kumar @ Chhotu, the husband of the deceased, besides others. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that primal role for committing the crime in question is against the husband of the deceased and not against the petitioner. Further more on close of investigation police has submitted charge sheet under sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and petitioner is a lady aged about 72 years. It is highlighted that co-accused Bindeshwari Prasad @ Bindy, father-in-law of the deceased has already been granted regular bail by this Court. Be that as it may, in view of nature of allegation and in view of the fact that petitioner happens to be the mother-in-law of the deceased, her prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. She must surrender in the court below in connection with Kashichak P.S. Case No. 20 of 2009, within a period of four weeks from - 2 - today and, if so advised, seek regular bail. If such a petition is filed in the court below, then the same may be disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J. ) M.Rahman