IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA SECOND APPEAL NO. 75 OF 2009 MR. GOPAL DAMODAR SINAI CACULO ... Appellant Versus M/S. CHOWGULE INDUSTRIES LTD AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Sudin Usgaonkar, Advocate for the Appellant. Coram:- R. M. SAVANT, J. Date:- 10th December, 2009 P.C. The above Appeal takes exception to the Judgment and Decree dated 21.08.2008 passed by the learned District Judge-I, Panaji. By the said Judgment and Decree, the Decree passed by the Trial Court dated 26.10.2005, came to be confirmed and the Regular Civil Appeal no. 119/2005 filed by the Appellant, came to be dismissed. 2. There are concurrent findings recorded by the Courts below in so far as the recovery of the sum of Rs.22,505.14 claimed by the Appellant/Plaintiff, as also as regards the claim of Rs.36,000/- as damages by the Appellant/Plaintiff are concerned. Both the Courts below, on the basis of the evidence, have held that the Plaintiff was not entitled to the said amounts. 3. I have heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant and perused the grounds of appeal. In my view, no substantial question of law arises for consideration. The Second Appeal is accordingly dismissed. R. M. SAVANT, J. arp/*