1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.3670 OF 1997. NO.3670 OF 1997. NO.3670 OF 1997. M/s.Amideep Investment & Consultants & Anr. : Plaintiffs versus Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co.Ltd. and ors. : Defendants. None for the Plaintiffs. Ms.Gauri Godse for the Defendant No.3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED DATED DATED : OCTOBER 13, 2008. : OCTOBER 13, 2008. : OCTOBER 13, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The orders passed from time to time show that the Plaintiffs and their advocate were absent. They have been absent from 25th July 2006 till 15th September 2008. In such circumstances, the suit is dismissed for want of prosecution. Ad-interim order, if any, to stand vacated. No Costs. 2 [S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J] [S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J] [S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J]