IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 18203 of 2003 Between: Kollipara Subba Rao, S/o.Mallikharjuna Rao R/o.Tadanki(P) Parmidimukkala Mandal, Krishna District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Asst.Commissioner of Labour, Vijayawada 2 The President, The V.S.P. Coop.Stores Ltd., Guntur. 3 The General Manager, K.C.P.B.&I.C.Ltd. Vuyyuru, Krishna Dist .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order or direction of writ particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondent in not reinstating the petitioner into his service with full backwages and with continuity of his service and with all other attendant beneﬁts as per the orders passed by the 1st respondent authorities u/s.48 of A.P.S.&E.ACT, 1988, in Case No.37/89, dt.38/11/01 is wholly illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to law and contrary to orders passed by the Authorities (A.C.L.Vijayawada) and violative of Art.14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to reinstate the petitioner into his service with full backwages and with continuity of service and with all other attendant benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner:MS.B.MALLESWARI Counsel for the Respondent : MR.KANAKAMEDALA RAVINDRA KUMAR FOR R2 The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 18203 of 2003 15-11-2008 Oral Order: Ms. B. Malleswari, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition no longer survives for adjudication. Recording the submission the writ petition is dismissed as ‘infructuous’. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 15-11-2008 Pvks