IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-25303 of 2009 Date of Decision: October 20, 2009 Kulwinder Kaur … Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present: Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate, for Mr. Parshotam Lal Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. S.D. Anand, J (Oral) Crl. Misc. No.45857 of 2009 Allowed, as prayed for. Crl. Misc. No.M-25303 of 2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he would be content and interests of justice would be served if a direction is issued to respondent No.2 – Senior Superintendent of Police, Muktsar, to look into the complaint (Annexure P/2) made by the petitioner within a time bound frame. Crl. Misc. No. M-25303 of 2009 Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. B.B.S. Teji, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. The petition shall stand disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 – Senior Superintendent of Police, Muktsar, to look into the grievance of the petitioner, in the course of the complaint (Annexure P/2). The exercise shall be concluded within one month from today. Disposed of accordingly. A copy of the order be given to the learned State counsel under the signatures of Special Secretary. October 20, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2