1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 183 OF 2008 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.25 OF 2008 Mrs.Susy Savio ... Petitioner Vs. Mr.Savio Alexander and anr. .... Respondent ----------- Mr.P.F.Joseph, Advocate for petitioner. Mr.Shashi Nair, Advocate for respondent no.1. Coram : P.B. MAJMUDAR & SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. Date : 24TH October, 2008 P.C. 1. In this civil application following prayers are made : a) Direct respondent-husband to file his passport in this Hon'ble Court; and b) Direct respondent No.1 to file proof of his home-address at Mumbai. 2. So far as proof of address is concerned, learned counsel for the respondent states that whatever applications are made in this Civil Application, he undertake to accept the copy of the same and even at the time of hearing, if any other proof is required by the court, he will give the same. So far as prayer regarding deposit of passport before this 2 Court is concerned, learned counsel for the respondent submitted that earlier such type of prayer was made but the same was withdrawn. The learned counsel for the applicant states that he had withdrawn that application as the respondent-husband has come back to India and at the time of filing of application, he was about to go out of India. In our view, we cannot grant this prayer as there is nothing on record to show that the respondent is going to leave the country with an object to avoid this proceedings. In view of the same, the prayer made in this behalf is not required to be granted. Civil Application is disposed off. [P.B.MAJMUDAR,J] [SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA,J]