1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE REVIEW PETITION NO.27 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.809 OF 2006 Anil Shah & anr. Petitioners vs. The Special Director of Enforcement & ors. Respondents None for the petitioners. Mr.A.M.Sethna for the respondents. CORAM : R. M. LODHA & J. P. DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED : 4th May, 2006 P.C. The matter was called out twice today. In the pre-lunch session, when nobody appeared for the petitioners, we kept the matter back for post lunch session. In post lunch session also nobody appears for the petitioners. Mr.A.M.Sethna, advocate appears for the respondents. For want of appearance on behalf of the petitioners, we are constrained to dismiss the review petition in default. We order accordingly. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) (J.P. (J.P. (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.) DEVADHAR,J.) DEVADHAR,J.)