1 CR.APLN NOS.5010/2010 & 4976/2010 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 CRI.APPLN/5010/2010 (BACHUBHAI BHURALALL PATEL VS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR) WITH CRI. APPLN/4976/2010 (SHAIKH AMIR SHAIKH ABDUL RAZZAK AND ORS vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.G.Ladda, Adv., and Mr. R.N.Dhorde, Adv., h/f Mr.S.B.Jadhav, Adv., for the respective applicants. Mr.K.M.Suryawanshi, APP for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 7/1/2011 1. Heard both the learned Counsel. The applicant in Criminal Application No.5010/2010 is purchaser of the agricultural property from the applicants in Criminal Application No.4976/2010. The sale deed is placed on record. The controversy revolves to a letter purportedly issued by the Chief Officer of Marathwada Wakf 2 CR.APLN NOS.5010/2010 & 4976/2010 Board dt.29.7.2010, addressed to the learned Collector, Aurangabad. The grievance of the Wakf Board is, such letter is not at all signed by the Marathwada Wakf Board, Aurangabad. It is informed, based on such forged letter, the sale transaction has been completed between the applicants herein. 2. The very letter dt. 29.7.2007 in its original is with the Police. There are inter se allegations between both the applicants; as to who has procured the letter dt.29.7.2007. At this stage, the Court need not to go into the feud as to who has procured the letter. The fact remains that it is prima facie a forged document. However, since the very document is with the Police, custodial interrogation of the accused/applicants is not warranted. If specimen is desired, it can be so gathered and facilitated by the accused/applicants herein, whenever needed. Hence order: 3 CR.APLN NOS.5010/2010 & 4976/2010 ORDER (a) In the event of arrest of the accused/applicants in application nos.5010/2010 and 4976/2010, in Crime No.I-81/2010 of MIDC Paithan Police Station, they be released on each of them furnishing P.R. bond and surety in the sum of Rs. 20,000/-(Rs.twenty thousand). (b) The accused applicants in application Nos.5010/2010 and 4976/2010 to attend the investigator on every alternate day between 4 to 6 p.m. upto 28th Feb.,2011. (c) These applicants shall furnish their specimen signatures or also furnish other details to the investigator, whatever is sought and also cooperate the investigator. (d) The applicants will not influence the witnesses. Both the applications allowed to the extent indicated above. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE AGP/5010-10crapl