Crl. Misc.No.M 33627 of 2010 # 1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAT AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc.No.M 33627 of 2010 Date of Decision:-22.11.2010 Chavvi & Anr. ......Petitioners. Versus State of Haryana & Ors. ......Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH. Present:- Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. M.S. Sindhu, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Navneet Singh, Advocate for respondents no.4 & 5. *** JASWANT SINGH, J.(ORAL) Petitioner no.1 on the basis of Matriculation examination certificate (P1) claims to be major in age as her date of birth recorded therein is 1.6.1990. She claims that on account of her love affair with petitioner no.2-Krishan, she solemnized her inter religion marriage on 17.4.2010 as per Hindu Rites. She further claims that she has renounced her Muslim religion and converted to Hindu religion on the same day i.e. 17.4.2010. The certificates of conversion and marriage are annexed as Annexures P3 and P4. It is further claimed that parents of petitioner no.1 i.e. Respondents no.4 & 5 namely Ismail Khan and Jarina on 9.5.2010 forcibly Crl. Misc.No.M 33627 of 2010 # 2# got performed her Nikah with Dilsher-respondent no.6 despite being disclosed that she was already married to petitioner no.2-Krishan. It is further stated that on 01.07.2010 she ran away from the custody of Dilsher- respondent no.6 and is now on the run with petitioner no.2. Apprehending threat to their life and liberty, petitioners have approached this Court under Section 482 Cr.PC for grant of protection. Notice of motion was issued for today. Petitioner no.1 is present in Court. She specifically states that her subsequent Nikah was void and nullity and she throughout treated petitioner no.2 as her husband with whom she wants to live. Respondents no.4 & 5-parents of petitioner no.1 along with their counsel have caused appearance in court and they have given assurance that they will not cause any harm to the life and liberty of the petitioners as they have accepted the inter religion marriage of their daughter with petitioner no.2-Krishan. Learned State Counsel on instructions from HC Mukesh Kumar states that after investigation a cancellation report has been prepared with regard to the FIR lodged by respondent no.7-Salim Khan regarding allegations of petitioner no.1 having been taken from the lawful custody of her husband Dilsher(respondent no.6). He further states on instructions from HC Mukesh Kumar that respondent no.6 has given up all claims with regard to his alleged marriage with petitioner no.1. Learned counsel of the petitioner in view of the aforesaid developments, very fairly submits that nothing survives in this petition and same be dismissed as infructuous. Crl. Misc.No.M 33627 of 2010 # 3# Dismissed as infructuous. ( JASWANT SINGH ) JUDGE 22nd November, 2010 Vinay