% ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Cc^ CONTEMFT PETITION^O. \ ^ 2. /2011 9SVft9 BMCll SB PETITIONERS y^y ^?^ ^ •?IIJS ^;^"W fit'iSIESSI i!K•M^^^^^m^ 1. ^ Laxmikant Das S/o Shri. Mahendra y' '" Das aged about- 37 years, Ex- Lecturer, Vivekanand Vidya Mandir, Ram Krishna M'ission Ashram, District -Narainpur (CG) Vinod Bangale S/o Late Shri. M.W. Bangale,aged about-41 yrs Ex-Incharge-Principal/Lecturer, Vivekanand Vidyapith, RamKrishna Mission Ashram, District -Narainpur (CG) 3^ Suresh Kumar Sa.hu S/o Shri. Indraman Sahu , aged about 40 years, Ex-Lecturer, Vivekanand Vidyapith, Aboojmad, Ram Krishna Mission Ashram, District -Narainpur (CG) 4^/ Shirish Kumar Tikariah S/o Shri. Satruhan Tikariah, aged about- 45years, Ex'UpperDivision Teacher, Ram Krishna Mission Ashram, District -Narainpur (CG) 5. ^-Nirmal Kumar Sahu, S/o Shri Garib Das Sahu, aged abuut 41 yrs Ex- UpperDivisionTeacher,Ram Krishna Mission Ashram, District -Narainpur (CG) 6^"^Kishori Lal Sahu, S/o Shri. Hari RaiTi Sahu, aged about-42 years,. Ex-Lower Division Teacher, Vivekanand Vidya Mandir, Akabeda, Ram Krishna Mission Ashram, District -Narainpur (CG) mm ^ ^ 7. /' 10. 1L 12, 13'. Gopal Ram Mandawi, 87o Shri Chamar S ingh Mandavi, aged about 37 years, Ex-Lower Division Teacher, Vivekanand Vidyamandir, Akabeda Ram Krishna Mission Ashram, District -Narainpur (GG) Ram^Singh Pradhan S/o Shri. Chamara Ram Pradhan, aged about 3 7 years, Ex-Lower Division Teacher, Ram Krishna Mission Ashram, District -Narainpur (GG) Parmanand Bhaskar, S/o Shri Dharam Singh Bhaskar, aged about 41years, Ex'LowerDivision Teacher, Ram KrishnaMission Ashram, District -Narainpur (CG) 'Ranieshwar Nag S/o Shri Roya Nag aged about 42 years, Ex- Lower Division Teacher, Ram Krishna Mission Ashram, District -Narainpur (CG) Balsai Komra S/o Shri.Bhikham Singh Komra, aged about -41 years, Ex-Lower DiYision Teacher, Ram Kristina Mission Ashram, District-Narainpur(CG) . Nakul Ram Nayak, S/o Shri. Shyamlal Nayak, aged about 42 years, Head Master, Ram Krishna Mission Ashram;District - Narainpur (CG) Tulsi Ram Bhoyar S/o Shri.Manu Ram Bhoyar, aged about- 32years, Medical Officer, K.a^hhapal, Vivekanand Vidya Mandiry Kam Krishna Mission Ashram, ^ •y r 1 Narainpur, District-Bastar (C G) 14. Vishwanath Markam S/o Late Shri. Chain Singh Markam, aged about 31 years, Rural Agricultural Extension Officer, Agricultural Training and Demostration Farm, Brehebeda, Ram Krishna Mission Ashram, District -Narainpur (CG) 15/"Dhanesh Yadav S/o Shri. Sitaram Yadav, aged about 47 years, Salesman, Ram Krishna Mission Ashram, District - Narainpur (CG) Versus CONTEMNORS Shri.R.P.Mandal S/o Name not known to the Petitioner, Sccretary, Schedule Caste, Schdule Tribe an.d Backward Class Welfare Department, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Dist-Raipur (C.G.) Shri. D.S. Dhananjaya S/o Name not known to F)etitioner, Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Campus Ravishankar University District-Raipur (C.G.) Shri. Prabhulal Ramteke. S/o Name not known to the Petitioner Assisstant Commissioner, District-Narainpur (CG) ICONTBMPT PETITION U/ SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 READ WITH ARTICLE ^215 QF THE CONSTITUTION^F INDIA *II*I^T n»*<!<»» '3'^ T*ll'Mf<rt'M, ^tilwKo, fs|<r!l-ylj,< ^.....C..tot:....&;..£2./^^p ^ ^ 3^?T 17^T ( ^i^<^T) 3TT^T ^T R'licb WT ^TT^T'^WW V.. . h 7^TW;Rf^T 3TF^T SB: Hon>ble Shri Manindra Mbhan Shrivastava, J. 16.8.2011 Shri Azad Siddique, coun Heard on admission. This petition has been fil^ disobedience of fhe order dat<| this Court in W.P. (S) No.689/: tibe S^tt. anld Leamed counsel for petitioners had earlier appr<| petition, claiming benefit of 5^ by this Court in the case of and Ors. (W.P.N0.41Q8/05) Febniary, 2007. He submits withdrawn with liberty to though, representation was not been decided. In his respondents ainounts to willflil 17tfa February, 2010. I am afraid, the subm^ssion petitioners is wiftiout any ba^i cni<l?<n<fll ^ITR^* °^fs^ Tf^R^R ^^tRf^^TT^T >el for fhe petitioners. ;d by fhe petitioners alle^ng willful ;d 17th February, 2010 passed by .0. petitioners submits that fhe |>ached ttiis Court by filing writ Pay Scale in view of order passed ^tt. A. Latl Vs. State of Chhattisgarh batch of petitions, decided on 6th writ petition was dismissed as taaake representation. Thereat'ter, ^de, the case of the petitioners has i, the inactiion on fhe part of disobedience of the order dated tiat mfede subdussion of learned counsel for fhe is. The petitionere were allowed to '•^3^^ /iL!^\ ^. ^^^./ ."•^,, ^-^^ ^^' •^^..,^^ XI-HC—78 ^TT^T "^T f<4i<=h '<W 3TT^T sFRh? ^ .It Praveen ^T 'TST ^i^Kn^, ^til^Ko, i«i<rii'y^< *ii*i<»ii w*iic»» """"""" """""""""""^ 200 3^SFT TnW (<i?i^<i^) ^TTW^CTftU 3Tr^?T ?- wifhdraw their writ petition It appears that fhe petitioner^ the light of order passed by (supra). Iffhe grievance ofth^ are not deciding their benefit, which they claim t4 petitioners' remedy Ues case of wiUful disobedience 2010. Therefore, I am not incl|: ^ifh fliis represetitatlon elsevfhere incltned The petition has no dismissed and is accordmgly howe^er The petitioners, recourse to such remedy as law. °bM?<n<IlTl ^ITR^f ^ ft(St Tf^$R ^^tRrqan^T Uberty to make representation. are claiming parity of treatment in Court in the case of Smt. A. Lall petitioners is fhatthe respondents and not extending t-he same be entitled, claiming parity, the ;. Certainly, it would not be a |of fhe order dated 17th Pebruaiy, to proceed in the matter, sulbstance. ibstance. The same deserves to be ipismissed at the admission stage. ', woiUd be at liberty to take ^nay be available to them under fhe Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge (-