IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 28TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 9TH PHALGUNA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 1710 of 2007(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.4657/2001 Dated 25/06/2001 .................... PETITIONER -------------- KERALA VYAPARI VYAVASAI EKOPANA SAMITHI, CHALAI MAIN UNIT, VYAPARA BHAVAN LANE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, PARAMESHWAR J.D., S/O JAYACHANDRAN NAIR, AGED 32 YEARS. BY ADV. SRI.BLAZE K.JOSE SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. AYYAPPAN, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED NOT KNOWN, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. T.K.RAVEENDRAN, S/O AND AGE NOT KNOWN, SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. REVADA CHANDRASHEKHAR, S/O AND AGE NOT KNOWN, CITY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. P.MOHANAN NAIR, S/O AND AGE NOT KNOWN, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,(TRAFFIC), FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== Cont.Case(C) NO. 1710 OF 2007 S ======================= Dated this the 28th day of February, 2008 J U D G M E N T This Contempt of Court case is filed alleging disobedience of the judgment in OP No.4657/2001. BY the judgment, the police authorities were directed to see that unauthorised street vendors/hawkers are not causing any obstruction to the ingress and egress to the shops of the members of the 1st petitioner. It was also directed that they will ensure that the unauthorised street vendors/hawkers are not causing any obstruction in the Chalai Bazar, East Fort etc. 2. The respondents have filed a statement in which they have explained the steps they have taken in compliance with the judgment of this court. It is stated that every action necessary is being taken to prevent obstruction as directed in the judgment. They have also referred to the cases they have filed whenever obstruction was noticed. Con.Case(c) 1710/07 :2 : In view of all these, I am not in a position to conclude that there has been any willful disobedience of the judgment. Contempt of Court case is only to be closed and I do so. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp