K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.305 OF 2006 The CIT Central-II Mumbai ..Appellant Versus Smt.Pratima Mehta ..Respondent ---- Mr.B.M.Chatterji @ Mrs.P.P.Bhosale & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.A.K.Jasani for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 26th March, 2008. PC 1. The learned Tribunal considering the order passed in connected cases of Deepika A.Mehta in Income Tax Appeal No.3554/Bom/94, Income Tax Appeal No.3654/Bom/94 & Income tax Appeal No.3557/Bom/94 for A.Y.1990-91, set aside the order of the Income tax authorities on the 2 grounds and restored the issues to the file of A.O. with the same directions and allowed the appeal of the assessee in part. 2. This appeal, according to the appellant, is preferred as they have preferred a reference against the order of the Tribunal in Deepika Mehta case. The matter was on board on 31.7.2007. The learned Counsel was not in a position to inform the Court as to what has happened to reference. In the light of : 2 : that, in our opinion, considering the order, no interference is called for. The authority below to pass appropriate order accordingly. 3. Apart from that we find that the tax incidence is less than Rs.4 lakhs. Learned Counsel states that there is a recurring issue but unable to find out, if any, other appeal is filed in this Court. For all the aforesaid reasons, appeal disposed off. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)