IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29768 of 2008 Doman Ali Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr ----------- For the Petitioner—Mr. Amimuddin Ahmad For the State --- Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhaya 03 14.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C is directed against the order dated 27.12.06 passed in Complaint Case No. 1829 of 2006 by the Court of C.J.M, Katihar, summoning the accused petitioner along with others on enquiry finding prima facie case under Section 489A,323,379 and 504 I.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner who is father-in-law of OP no. 2, Shabnam Ara has been falsely implicated in this case only on the allegation to harass the OP no. 2 who is residing happily with her husband Sabid Ali who is named as accused no. 1 in the Complaint petition. The impugned order goes to show that learned C.J.M on perusal of the complaint and statements of witnesses, has arrived at a conclusion that prima facie case is 2 made out for offence under Section 498A, 323, 379 and 504 and accordingly ordered to issued summon against the four accused persons including the petitioner. There is nothing in the impugned order to show that there was any abuse of the process of the court. Accordingly this application is dismissed. Namita ( Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)