THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH W.P.NO.9177 OF 2009 O R D E R Aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents 1 to 3 in not providing police protection to the petitioner based on her representation dated 27.4.2009 and in not taking action as per her complaint dated 13.4.2009 in F.I.R.No.210/2009, the present writ petition is filed. The 3rd respondent – Inspector of Police, filed counter affidavit with following averments: “2. It is respectfully submitted that on the private complaint lodged by the petitioner referred by the Hon’ble IV ACMM Court, Hyderabad to the respondent no.3, a case in Crime No.210/2009 was registered U/s. 341, 427, 506 IPC on 20.4.2009 against the respondents 4 to 7. 3. It is submitted that during the course of investigation the petitioner and other witnesses were examined as L.Ws.1 to 4 and their statements were recorded in detail. 4. It is submitted that the respondents 4 to 7 surrendered themselves before the Hon’ble IV ACMM Court, Hyderabad and they were released on bail vide M.P.No.1730/2009 dated 1.6.2009. It is submitted that the investigation is almost completed and a charge sheet is being filed shortly before the said Hon’ble Court. 5. It is submitted that the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 27.4.2009 to the respondents 2 and 3 to grant police protection. I submit that I called the respondents 4 to 7 and the petitioner to the police station and asked the respondents 4 to 7 not to harass the petitioner i.e., parents The respondents 4 to 7 promised not to harass the petitioner. Accordingly the petitioner was satisfied about their promise. This respondent is ready to provide police protection to the petitioners as and when it is required. The petitioner can approach this respondent if the need arises.” In view of the above categorical statement made by the 3rd respondent in paragraph no.5 of the counter affidavit, no orders need be passed and the writ petition is accordingly closed. No costs. AVS -------------------------------- 05—10—2009