FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8251 OF 2011 "Kishor Harilal @ Hariseth Agrawal Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. Sudhir K. Chavan, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. V.H. Dighe, AGP for respondents. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 21st OCTOBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] The petitioner has approached this court for a direction to include his name in the voters list of respondent No.5. It is the contention of the petitioner that since the petitioner's father has expired in 2002, and since shares in the name of the deceased father of the petitioner are already transferred in his name, his name ought to have been inclined in the voters list. 2] Undisputedly, the cut off date for the election programme is already declared in 18.1.2011. The name of the petitioner alongwith others has been forwarded by the respondent No.5 to the Collector on 27.4.2010. Perusal of the record would reveal that the resolution for granting approval to the transfer of shares of the deceased father of the petitioner, in FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8251 OF 2011 "Kishor Harilal @ Hariseth Agrawal Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 the name of the petitioner, has been passed on 2/9/2008. Undisputedly, the same has been passed after the cut off date i.e. 18/1/2008. In that view of the matter, we find that the reliefs claimed in the petition can not be granted. 3] Writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. [M.T. JOSHI,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-