IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.15419 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 23, 2011 Raj Rishi Sharma ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: None for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. On 23.5.2011, the counsel for the petitioner had taken time to place on record the enquiry report. Thereafter the case has been adjourned on two occasions on 14.7.2011 and 12.9.2011 for complying with the order dated 23.5.2011. Till date, the enquiry report has not been placed on record. Prayer made in the petition is for quashing the FIR registered under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. What relevance the enquiry report will have on the criminal charges that have been alleged in the FIR is not understood. In any case, the petitioner has not complied with the directions. None has appeared today even on second call. This petition is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to file a fresh petition, if so advised, by placing all the documents on record. December 23, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE