IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.566 of 2005 M/S ANAND ENTERPRISES, KORAT BARI, P.S. K. HAT, DISTRICT PURNEA, THROUGH PROPRIETOR SAPNA PODDAR, WIFE OF SRI SANJAY KUMAR, RESIDENT OF KORAT BARI MADHUBANI, P.S. K. HAT, DISTRICT PURNEA….PETITIONER. Versus 1. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. THROUGH THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOM. BIHAR CIRCLE, PATNA 2. GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOM, BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD., BHAGALPUR. 3. DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOM, BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD., BHAGALPUR 4. DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOM (FINANCE) BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM, BHAGALPUR ………….RESPONDENTS. For the petitioner : Mr. Surya Narayan Poddar, Advocate. For B.S.N .L. : Mrs. Renuka Sharma No.2, Advocate. ----------- 02/ 04.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed for direction to the respondents authorities to register the name of the petitioner-firm under the Category ‘C. 3. From the facts and circumstances of the case as well as from the pleadings of learned counsel for the parties in the writ petition and the counter affidavit, it transpires that in response to the tender notice several tenders were submitted for enlistment of contractors in Category ‘C’. It further transpires that when the tenders were opened it was found that according to the claim of the petitioner he had only three years experience although the requirement was five years experience and accordingly his claim was rejected. So far the other claimants, including M/s Vijay Kumar & Sons are concerned, - 2 - some documents, training details and Income Tax clearance were wanting and hence they were asked by letter of September, 2003 (Annexure-4) to produce the same and after the said candidates produced the required papers, they were duly enlisted. 4. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, neither the petitioner was entitled to be enlisted nor any case of discrimination is made out. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. Harish (S.N. Hussain, J.)