IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.6519 of 2009 MOHAMMAD GHULAM RASOOL @ GHULAM RASOOL son of late Iddu Mian, resident of village- Kako, P.S. Kako, district- Jehanabad. ….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Arjun Pd. Mehta, son of Late Bal Kishun Mahto, r/o village- Khatka Chak, Naili (Chand Chaura) P.S. Civil Line, Dist.- Gaya, …Opposite Parties ----------- 3/ 23.8.2010 Heard the parties. On 23.2.2010, when the matter was heard, it was submitted that since the petitioner had already deposited the defalcated amount in the account of the informant further proceeding should not be allowed to continue. Upon this, opposite party no.2 was noticed, who has appeared and states that in fact the money has been refunded but still wants to prosecute the accused. Considering that the petitioner seeks quashing on disputed question of facts, I am not inclined to entertain the application. The application is dismissed. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)