IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 929 OF 2010 IN MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 928 OF 2010 SHRI DILIP RAMNATH BORKAR AND ORS. ... Applicant Versus SHRI UDAY NARAYAN KAMAT AND ORS. ... Respondent Mr. P. Bandodkar, Advocate for the applicants. Ms. N. Pimenta, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 9, 6a & 10a To 10d Coram:- S.B. DESHMUKH, J. Date:- 29th January, 2011 P.C.:- Heard learned Counsel for the parties. By this application, the applicants are seeking exemption from producing the death certificate of deceased respondent No.7, on record. Counsel appearing for the applicant points out para 2 of the application. In para 2, a statement is made that the Advocate appearing for the deceased respondent 7 informed by communication dated 25.6.2010 to the Advocate for the applicants that respondent No.7 is no more. According to this communication, respondent No.7 died somewhere in the month of November-December, 2009. 2. In para 3, the applicants have made a statement that they could not get the death certificate of deceased respondent No.7 on search from the Village Panchayat of Penha de Franca. The Counsel appearing for the applicants states that in this background, the exemption to produce the death certificate be granted in favour of the applicants. 3. Counsel appearing for the respondents who is present before the Court does not dispute the alleged death of respondent No.7. Apart from this, the provisions laid down under Order 22, Rule 10A of the C.P.C. can be considered. 4. In the case on hand, the death of respondent No.7 has been communicated by the Counsel for the respondent No.7 to the Counsel appearing for the present applicants. In this background, exemption prayed for by the applicants from producing the death certificate on record, in my view, can be granted. 5. Misc. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 6(A) and disposed of. S.B. DESHMUKH, J. ssm.