IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19785 of 2010 Ranjan Devi, w/o Dhirendra Prasad Yadav, R.O.V Kyotapatti, Gram Panchayt Kahaiya, P.S. Kishanpur, Dist-Supaul. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Department of Social Welfare, Old Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Director, Integrated Child Development Scheme(ICDS) Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Supaul. 4. The District Programme Officer, Supaul. 5. The Child Development Project Officer, Kishanpur, District-Supaul. 6. The Mukhiya, Gram Panahayt Karhaiya Block, Kishanpur, Dist- Supaul. 7. Uma Kumari, W/o Bhaw Narayan Prasad, R.O.V Kyatapatti, (Karhiya) P.S. Kishanpur, Dsit-Supaul. ----------- 3 29.04.2011 The grievance of the petitioner is that though she was above in the panel but the private respondent has been appointed as Anganbari Sevika, ignoring her claim. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already filed her complaint before the Collector, vide Annexure-4, as well as before the District Programme Officer and some enquires have also been directed in the case, but till now no final orders have been passed by the Collector on her complaint. In the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the Collector, to consider the complaint of the petitioner, hear the parties, get enquiries made if necessary, and pass final order with regard to the complaint of the petitioner in accordance with law, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Prakash ( J.N.Singh, J.)