mst FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.146 OF 2009 Dhruv Mahendrabhai Rathod Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.147 OF 2009 Mahendrabhai Valjibhai Rathod Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Milind S. Gyani for the applicant. Ms.S.V.Gajre, APP for the State. V.B.Ghoppade for respondents 2 and 4. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 13th July 2009 PC :- 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicants and learned advocate for second and fourth respondents. Learned advocate for the applicant states that in fact notice was served to the third respondent. In view of the averments made in the applications, a case for restoration is made out. Accordingly, Criminal Applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. The main writ petitions shall be fixed for admission on 18th August 2009. (A.S.OKA, J.)