IN THE mOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITIONNO. ^ 7>ffLf / 2006 PETITIONER .^y. i.-fy8''~ -••' %%y /w /^ ^v ^.f- ^Sr' RESPONDENTS ^ ./''.-" Khorbahara Ram Ganjeer S/o Laxman Singh Ganjeer Aged about 59 years Occupation- Revenue Inspector, R/o- Modipur, Ward No-5 HouseNo- 153, Sitlapara Dist- Rajnandgoan (C.G) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Revenue Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G) 2. Collector Rajnandgoan (C.G) 3. Superintendent Land Revenue Office Rajnandgoan (C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT ORDER OF DIRECTION TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. rv HI6H COURT OF CHHATHS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.No. 1304/2006 Petitioner : Khorbdiaru Ram Sanjeer Versus Respondents : Stcrte of Chhattisgarh & others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sfftish K. Agnihotri. J Shri Manindra Shrivostava, Senior Advocate wilh Shri H. S. ^iluuwt'ia, Advocate for the petitioner. 5hri Sushil Dubey, Sovemment Advocerte for the respondents/State. OR&ER yassed on -this 14th day of becember, 2006) The following order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri. J. 1. Leamed Senior counset oppearing for the petitioner as wetl as learned 6ovt. Advocate dppearing for the respondents/Slute jointly submit •thot the facts of the present case are simitar to that of in W. P. No. 4033/2004 ( 5<mtosh Kumar Asati Vs. State of Chhatt'isgarh & another), which wias allowed vide order dated 20.4.2005 and •that of in W. P. No. 2222/2004 (Bhonuram 5ahu Vs. Sta-te of Chhattisyxrh & others), which wos di^iosed of vide order dated 1.2.2006, They further submit that the question of law involved is also the same, 2. In view of the ubove stnted submissions made by leamed counsel for the parf-ies this petition is allowed in terms of the order dated 27.10.2006 passed by this Court in W.P.No. 5742/2006 and the order cbted 1.2.2006 passed by this Court in W.P.NO. 2222/2004. No order as to costs. Thakur Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge