1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.3135 OF 2005 Shri Sitaram Bandu Panwal & Ors. ...Petitioners. Vs. Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr. A. P. Vanarse for the Petitioners. Mrs. S. V. Bharucha with Mr. D. A. Pandey & Mr.Y. S. Bhate for the Respondents. ..... CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, J. AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. February 8, 2006. P.C. The issue involved in this petition is similar to that of Writ Petition No.5792 of 2004. The tribunal by its order dated 16th December 2004 in Original Application No.320 of 2004 allowed the application of the applicants before it but restricted the claim after the date of representation which is dated 20th October 2003. The Petitioners had set out the period served by them in para 4 of the Original Application. None of them was on duty or work on 20th October 2003. Considering that and for the reasons set out while disposing of Writ Petition No.5792 of 2004, the impugned order dated 16th December 2004 is set aside and the Respondents are directed to pay to the Petitioners, amount due to them for the 2 period for which they actually worked. The order stands modified accordingly. The Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ( F.I. Rebello, J.) (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)