CRM-M- No. 33035 of 2011 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M- No. 33035 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 03.11.2011 Rajesh Gupta …Petitioner Versus Madhu and another …Respondents ………. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner. *** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned trial court vide order dated 08.09.2011 has closed the evidence of the husband (petitioner herein) in proceedings under Section 127 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner-husband has vehemently stated that on the next date fixed by this Court entire evidence shall be produced and no further adjournment shall be sought. The golden rule that sufficient opportunity should be granted to either of the party before taking decision on the lis between the parties is fully applicable in the present case. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct that learned Magistrate shall fix a date for producing the evidence of the petitioner (respondent therein) in the month of CRM-M- No. 33035 of 2011 (O&M) 2 December, 2011. On the date so fixed, husband (respondent therein) shall produce all the evidences. Learned Magistrate shall record the evidence on day to day basis. Husband-petitioner shall pay `10,000/- as costs to the respondent-wife as pre condition of fixing the date for the evidence of the petitioner (respondent therein). Petition stands disposed of. ( Alok Singh ) November 3, 2011 Judge Anand