IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.39 of 2011 Bablu Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 4.8.2011 I.A.No.1658 of 2011 While hearing on the interlocutory application which seeks condonation of delay of two days in filing the Special Leave to Appeal against the judgment of acquittal passed by Smt. Shachi Mishra, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Patna on 17.5.2011 in Complaint Case No. 50 ( C ) of 1998, Trial No. 1632 of 2011, the Court heard learned counsel for the applicant on the merit of the appeal and perused the judgment, specially, paragraphs 14, 15 and onwards. This Court comes to a conclusion that there may not be any good reason to grant Special Leave to the complainant- applicant for filing the appeal. The Court below has considered the evidence of the witnesses which was general in nature as regards the assault and most of its part was confusing. Besides, the court has noticed that there was contradiction in the statements of the complainant and his father on similar facts and some of the witnesses had stated that the compromise had been struck between the parties and ignoring that and without indicating any reason that the second complaint was necessary to be filed, the complaint petition was filed before the court below. In the light of the evidence the court below passed the order of 2 acquittal. Considering the evidence available on the record, the Court is not inclined as there appears no reason to grant Special Leave to Appeal against the order of acquittal passed in the above noted case. The application for condonation of delay as also the Special Leave to Appeal stand dismissed as of no merit. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)