... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.31 OF 1990 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : MARCH 18, 2006. : MARCH 18, 2006. : MARCH 18, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. None appears for the Appellant. Order dated 29th April, 2004 passed by this Court discloses that the Advocate for the Appellant made a statement that the Appellant has collected papers of the Appeal from him two years prior to the date of said order. Therefore, court service notice was ordered to be issued to the Appellant. The office noting made today shows that court service notice is returned unserved with the remark ‘want of full and correct address’. Court service notice is issued at the address of the Appellant mentioned in the cause title of the Appeal. If the address of the Appellant has undergone a change, he should have complied with provisions of sub-rule 2 of Rule 14A of Order VI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. However, he has not complied with the said provision. Hence, dismissed for want of prosecution. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE