BI » IBLTHB HIOH COURT OF JODICATURB AT BDLASFUR W. P.no. 2-37-3 /2001 APPLICANT ..••i' ^.'..<""(?(r.^<'' •'"••".' ^:^" .-^^'' -\ ^••"^^"^ K^.- •• .-^ Vermw c.'; RESPONDENTS Sri. Aiiil Yadav, S/o. Bodhram Yadav, Aged: about 41 years, working as Assistent Teacher in fhc 'Secondaty School, Najpr PaUka, Raigarh, Distt Rai^A. (C.G.) 1. State of Chhatti^arh, Through: The Secretaxy Departxnent of School Educatioii, D.K. Buildit^, Raipur (CUhattisgarIi). 2. The Comaaissioner, Bilaspur, Bfli^pur Division, Chhatdsgarh. 3. District Education OflBcer, Raigarh, DtetrictRaigarh.(C.G.) 4. M.P.State Admnustrative Trfcunal Bench, Raipur Thxough its R^gpstear. WMT PBtITIOM UHDBRARHdA 226/287 Or THB consmTunoa OF nroiA FORM8UA»<»OF A SOTTABLE WRIT. ORDBR CTlDIRBCnON TO DO JU8TICB m THBatATTBR DBTAIL8 OF THB PBWTKMI 1. ~ PiBUculan ofthe Betitioafet. As per cause tifte. fi i::a E:!l ^•?. KS an^r^il' fipiTOan^i 'I^SV^ ^T€<1 J^S T^ ^Wvftf, ^WW, hwwy. ) 'gpR'trww*VJ.P.^ .2-^3/2-MT1 " {. 200 sn^i'reiiWHfkB DB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice 7.12.2001 Petitioner by Shri State by Dr. N.K.S^ukla Shri Gautam Bhaduri, (^ovt. Heard finaUy wlfh ofher connected matters pie consent ofthe parties along wifh lanalogousl^. also passed orders in fhej After passing of fh.i this Court some of thel Qovt./couipetent aufhor] some have approached f|ie the order. ^«t<-i41-tMW<rtl''?1STAlf5R5R ^73ipa*!an^i W.A.Shishak,C.J. [>akhruddin,J. fYc^k^y^ ^sX^^.t(f. la, Deputy Advocate Generalwifh . Advocate. It is pointed out th^t earlier in Writ Petitiori No. 1343 of 2001 ( Chfaattisgarh T^atiya Warg Shaskiya Karmachari Sangh Vs. State of Chl|iattisgarh 85 others) leamed Smgle Bench of this Court h4d passed order on 20.8.2001 wifh som.e observations. Lear^ed Single Bench of this Gourt has petitions filed by the individuals. ; orders by leamfid Suigle Bench; of petitioners approached thfi Stati® ty by raaking representattons arid Comiaissioner as was directed tn ['qt^^S^ XI-HC-22 XI-HC-22 ^SII^T^T W snSn ^iict) ^tf^T ^ ^ 'S^ -^WM^, aflly'i®,r»«-ii'ylj< 'S^ rifwwf,wAwtd, Tvwwy, WHWT^fiW u .f. (n .as>-^>/^fiy| "s^ 311^1'TCiIW^ife Feelmg aggrieved| representations some Admtnistrative Tribiina] Leamed State Adniinisl orders tn each ofthe petijion. Against fhe prder passed by the State Administrative Tfibunal fhe petitioners have flled petitions before fhls Cou(t. The inatter relates and posting of teachers education session is posting by which some o: is of fhe inonthof July 2' Utigattng tn Coi-irts, the in absence of teachers. schools there is no teaclli • ^y . ,one teacher/hence no ct)M^*fll fV^t ^ fs*<:1 <Ri)^l< ^si^aH sii^i by the decision on thetr |of them. approached fhe State by flltng Origtnal Applications. Lrative Tribunal passed individual |;o poUcy of rationallzation of transfer |3f Primary an.d Middle Schools. The ;opng on. The order of transfer and the persons/teachers are aggrieved )01. Froni that tiine tUe teachers are ^ducation of fhe students is afiecting Dr Shukla siibmits'that in soine? :r and in souie schools there is only t^aching is being carried oiifan.d the^ ['^^^f^ 'SsS'S^^^^QS '.••xs^': /^.',;jlllif^;; '^.' ^ i? 1 i IIM • XI-HC-22 •sii^r'w K-iyiisn^r w>^\^ 'w^f 1. < 'S^g -'il'ill<'l''<, aflly'is, (s«ni<Hi,< WTOiTWW^i^:.:^^.^^l2'sv^ "^ 200 sn^i'ron^re ^f?g 'Y transferTed teachers sho|uld join at their place of posting so that interest of the stude be safeguarded. We have given our| aspects pf the uiatter. institutions and petition| scrutinized and that th^ tnterest as weU as tn fh< State, no case for uiterfej Havuig thus consid the case if is just and pi|'i those who, tncluding fh|e place of postmg, to join uja 2001 at fheir respective t so in order to know the CTi|-l)[CT'4ll 'RTR^ff/^ ti^ ^PaK^K ^; aifigii sn^i |nts, institution and petitioners uiay thoughtfiil consideration on aU the |n fhe best interest of the students, ^rs whose'cases have already been transfer betng exigency of service, the rationalization is bejing earried on in the larger public mterest of education in this tribal 'ence is niade outat this stage. ered fbe facts and circuinstances of oper that a dtrection be issued tfaat petitioners, have not jomed-tlieir imediately latest by iSfh December^ dace of posting, work for a laorith pr ground realities and situation and if [^•^ai .;.;"i'«^t.^S£;B; p; E^':! XI-HC-22 sii^sfwr RM&lsiii^ $b*-tt%^tft^ '3^' ^l'^yigaaJliJiglB''1"*!^ WHe'ff shiKhu ^'^.ciry\^l'L-<%1 ^ 2BO sii^i TEgiw ^ifCT <^Nt<n-4ii M}^^ ^ fs^ •(l^t-^K ^? SlPtR 311^1 thereafter certatn difficullties/problenis do anse then it wiU be open to them to ruake documents to the State ^. representation wifh details and Goveniment and If requtred may approach this Court to^ redressal of their grievances or difiiculties as the si^uation may warTaat includuig transfer/adjustment. With the above diTe<j;tion this:petition is disposed of. A copy of this or^er be placed on record of other connected matters. Certifled copy, as pe|r Rules, ' Sd/-" ChiefJustice Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge