IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 567 of 2008 Pankaj Mani Gupta & others. …..… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand & another. …….. Respondents Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent No. 1. Mr. Narendra Bali, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. The Compounding Application is at Page 49 of the Paper Book. I have noticed two glaring omissions; firstly the Compounding Application has not been given any number, and secondly it is not accompanied by any filing sheet. Registrar (Judicial) shall enquire into the matter and submit a report on the Administrative side. The Compounding Application be registered and given appropriate number. The compounding Application has been signed by the parties, i.e. the petitioners and respondent No. 2, and is supported by the individual affidavit of respondent No. 2 as well as the affidavit of Dharmendra Sharma, petitioner No. 10. For the reasons stated, the Application is allowed. The offences are compounded. The main petition, being C482 No. 567 of 2008, is also allowed with all the consequences. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 04.09.2008 G