IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 28TH MARCH 2008 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 12217 of 2007(D) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- M.R.NOMA, W/O ANILKUMAR, 'KARTHIKA', POTHENCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.J.HARIKUMAR SRI.HARIKUMAR.S. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, VELLAYAMBALAM BRANCH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER. BY ADV. SRI.L.MOHANAN, SC, KFC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.12217/2007 D APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 23/09/2006. EXT.P2: COPY OF APPLICATION DTD. 30/12/2006 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: COPY OF LETTER FROM THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 26/03/2007. /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ----------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 12217 OF 2007 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT In this Writ Petition, the challenge is against Ext.P3 communication issued by the respondent intimating the liability of the petitioner. It is unsatisfied with the quantification of the liability, this Writ Petition is filed and the second relief that is sought for is to direct the respondents to disclose the amount that she may have to pay under the OTS Scheme to pay the dues and close the loan. 2. In the statement filed, the stand taken by the respondent is that by applying their rules of the OTS Scheme in vague, the petitioner is not eligible for the benefit. 3. Be that as it may, now what is prayed for by the counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner should be given a detailed statement of accounts intimating the liability that is due. This request is quite reasonable and I see no good reasons to decline the same. 4. Therefore, I direct that the respondents shall, within three WPC No. 12217 OF 2007 2 weeks from production of this judgment, furnish a detailed statement of accounts to the petitioner. 5. It is also directed that while intimating the liability as above, the admissible benefits, if any, under the OTS Scheme will also be given to the petitioner. Thereafter the petitioner will be permitted to discharge the liability, the period of which will also be informed to the petitioner. Until the liability intimated as above is discharged and for four weeks thereafter, the interim order dt.10.04.07 will continue. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the respondents for compliance. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ttb WPC No. 12217 OF 2007 3