963% Ki} @ SUBHASH KAR, AGED — 52 YEARS, S/O SHRI KARTIKESHWAR KAR, POSTED AS — SAHAYAK ANTARIK LEKHA PRIKSHAN AVAM KARAROPAN ADHIKAR AND INCHARGE PANCHAYAT AVAM SAMAJ SHIKSHA SANGATHAK, AT — JANPAD PANCHAYAT, SARAIPALI, DISTRICT - MAHASAMUND (C. G.) 1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISG-ARHI AT - BILA§PUR WRIT PETITION (S) No.w OF 20,09, PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS : STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH—ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT & RURAL DEVELOPMENT MANTRALAYA, D. K. S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR THE DIRECTOR, PANCHAYAT & SOCIAL WELFARE, CHHATTISGARH, H. Q. - RAIPUR. THE COLLECTOR, DISTRICT 4 MAHASAMUND (C. G.) THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PANCHAYAT AND SOCIAL WELFARE, MAHASAMUND, DISTRICT — MAHASAMUND (C. G.) ” SHRI M. M. NAG, THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, JANPAD PANCHAYAT, SARAIPALI, DISTRICT - MAHASAMUND (C. G.) Writ @ \2.) 226 of the Petition under Articie - Constitution of India. HIGH SGUR? 9F CHHA’?T%SGARH : E§LAS§UR WRIT PETIT§CN (S) N3. 5523 CF 20G9 PEWTIGNER Subhash Kar Versus RESPGNDENTS Siate of Chha‘rk‘isgarh 8: Gthers (Writ petition undei' Ariide 225 0f ihe Comtituiion G? imia) Singie Bench : Hcfi’b§e Shré Sat§sh K. Agaihotri, J. Presen’i :- 81m RK. Keshaywani, ccunse§ iei the goeiiiiener. Ms 5mita i3hai, Fanei Lawyer fef the $‘ta1e. QR ti \ OriAL‘ {Passed or: this 24m day cf Sentembaz, 2999) i With the consent of ieamec§ counsei swearing fer the pariies, frze petition is ‘neam’ finaiiyy 2. The petiiioner, by ibis peiitioa, immigne the suspensien steer dated ‘14-9—20i39 (Annexure —— Pi?) passed by ihe Ceiiecton iviahsamunci, on the greuiad that the cider has been passec; with maia ride inieniion on vague aiiegaiiens wiihou‘; heiding any preiiminafy eaquiry. 3. Be that as if may, the eiincipie of iaw on easpension is weii settieci. The ehiy requirement fa.’ piecing a perscn is that theie is some aiiegation and on ihe basis of said alieg'ation eiiher enquiry is coniempiated or has been initiated‘ 4. in the preseni case, on perusai of the order! it appears that ihe enquiry is contempiated. Even orherwise, there is a safeguarci under ihe orovisions of iaw that if oharge sheet is moi issued within a period of 45%} days, as the ease may be, i’ne suspension stanois revoked. There is no irreguiaiii‘y or iiiegaiity in ihe impugned Sirspensior‘: order aho 451%} days, as ihe case may be, has aiso noi been over from ihe date of issuance of suspensieh order. in view of foregoing, the writ petition is iiebie to be and is here‘oy dismissed a‘i the moiion stage itseif. , xx x: i. ‘ a PSh K‘ ' Agnlhntri a ‘ ‘1 Judge