IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19197 of 2011 Munna Prasad, S/O-Ramchandra Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 05.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named in the first information report and as per prosecution case the victim left her home in the company of the petitioner and other F.I.R. named accused persons but she did not return to her home. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that according to prosecution case itself, the victim left her home on 08.12.2010 whereas the informant lodged the present case on 16.12.2010. It is also pointed out by him that before institution of the present case, the informant had given an informatory petition about the missing of the victim but she nowhere stated in the said petition that the victim had left her home in the company of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Chandradip P.S. Case No. 01 of 2011. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)