In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Revision No. 3223 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision:January 12, 2010 Sube Singh ---Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ---Respondents Coram: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH *** Present: Mr. A.S.Kalra, Advocate, for the petitioner *** GURDEV SINGH, J. Heard. This revision petition has been preferred by Sube Singh- petitioner-accused, against order dated 24.11.2009 passed by Ms. Shalini Singh Nagpal, Additional Sessions Judge, Karnal, vide which she dismissed the application of the petitioner filed under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for recalling Sumit Kumar Arora Expert, DW-2, for further examination. That application was moved before the trial court on the ground that his report and other relevant documents were not properly exhibited. It has been submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that this expert compared the disputed signatures of Balinder Singh-deceased, on the suicide note with his admitted signatures on the insurance policy and the school record. The documents consisting of insurance policy and school Crl. Revision No. 3223 of 2009 (O&M) -2- record were not properly proved. A copy of the statement of the said expert has been filed along with the revision petition. Certified copies of the insurance policy and school record were exhibited without any objection from the side of State. The genuineness of those documents was not even challenged during the cross examination. When such is the case, it cannot be said that recalling of that expert for further examination is essential to the just decision of the case. There is no merit in the revision and is dismissed as such. (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE January 12, 2010 PARAMJIT