IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Crl.P.No.5599 of 2007 and Crl.P.No.781 of 2008 CRL.P.No.5599 of 2007 Between:- Rathlavath Pandu and five others …Petitioners A n d Jarpula Srinu and another …Respondents A N D Crl.P.No.781 of 2008 Between:- Rathlavath Pandu and two others …Petitioners A n d Jarpula Srinu and another …Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRL.P.No.5599 OF 2007 & CRL.P.No.781 OF 2008 COMMON ORDER: Crl.P.No.5599 of 2007 is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash the proceedings in P.R.C.No.59 of 2007, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Kalwakurthy against the petitioners/A-1 to A-6. 2. Crl.P.No.781 of 2008 is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash the proceedings in P.R.C.No.40 of 2007, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Kalwakurthy against the petitioners/A-1 to A-3. 3. Arguments of the learned counsel for both sides in both the criminal petitions are heard. Perused the records. 4. On a complaint given by one Rathlavath Laxman, the first respondent in Crl.P.No.781 of 2008, Police, Veldanda filed a charge sheet against A-1 to A-3 in P.R.C.No.40 of 2007 for the offence under Section 306 IPC. A-2 and A-3 are the parents of A-1. It is stated that there was a love affair between A-1 and daughter of the first respondent-de facto complainant, but the same was not to the liking of the parents of the girl. The deceased girl Dhanalaxmi committed suicide at her parents’ house at Dubba Thanda by consuming poison at about 03-00 p.m., on 26-07-2006. It is alleged that the parents of the girl illegally confined her in the house of her brother at Atchampet village and there also she was tortured and that she escaped somehow and reached Veldanda village by boarding an auto of one Eshwar along with her friend Rajitha and on the way she narrated the entire incident and the alleged harassment meted out to her, to her friend Rajitha and the auto driver Eshwar. Accused Nos.1 to 3, who are petitioners in Crl.P.No.781 of 2008, contend that the deceased committed suicide due to the harassment by her parents and brothers, who opposed her marriage with A-1. In order to escape from the clutches of law, a false complaint is given against him by the father of the girl and the police have filed a charge sheet without any basis. 5. The petitioners in Crl.P.No.5599 of 2007, who are A-1 to A-6 in P.R.C.No.59 of 2007, allege that it was the complainant and his parents who have subjected the deceased Dhana Laxmi to harassment and unable to bear the same, she consumed pesticide and committed suicide. On a complaint given by the boy, the police registered a case in Cr.No.62 of 2006 and after investigation filed a charge sheet against the parents and brothers of the girl for the offence under Section 306 read with Sections 109 and 120-B IPC and the same was taken cognizance in P.R.C.No.59 of 2007. 6. Thus, there are allegations and counter- allegations made by both parties against each other and a case and counter-cases are registered and after investigation, charge sheets were filed in both matters. In P.R.C.No.40 of 2007, accused Nos.1 to 3 i.e., boy and his parents are facing prosecution for the offence under Section 306 IPC. In P.R.C.No.59 of 2007, accused Nos.1 to 6, who are the parents and brothers of the girl, are facing prosecution for the offence under Section 306 read with Sections 109 and 120-B IPC. The evidentiary value of the statements made by the witnesses examined in both cases cannot be gone into at this stage. Both parties are blaming each other for the death of the deceased girl due to suicide. Which of the two versions is true, is a matter to be considered only after evidence is adduced in both the cases during the course of trial. The extraordinary and inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C cannot be invoked for quashing further proceedings when specific allegations are made and the matter needs to be enquired into. 7. In the circumstances, it is considered neither just nor expedient to quash further proceedings in both the cases. There are no valid or sufficient grounds for quashing further proceedings in pursuance of P.R.C.No.59 of 2007 and P.R.C.No.40 of 2007, both on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Kalwakurthy, in respect of the accused. 8. In the result, both the criminal petitions are dismissed. Interim order of stay granted in both the criminal petitions stand vacated. ____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 08th July, 2010. Lrkm.