1 ARBAP81.07 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 81 OF 2007 M/s.Ameya Developers Pvt. Ltd. ... Applicant Vs 1. Union of India & ors. ... Respondents Mr. Toni S. Sachdevani for the Applicant. Mr. T.J. Pandian for the Respondent No.1. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 15TH JULY, 2010. P.C. : 1. This is an application under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for appointment of an Arbitrator. 2. Certain disputes and differences had arisen between the parties during the subsistence of the contract. Those disputes and differences had been referred to an arbitral tribunal. That arbitration is still going 2 ARBAP81.07 on. During the pendency of that arbitration, the Respondent terminated the contract, which has given rise to fresh disputes and differences. By this application, the Applicant seeks appointment of an arbitral tribunal to decide these fresh disputes and differences which have arisen on account of the subsequent developments. The Applicant agrees to restrict its entire claim to twenty per cent of the contract value to be determined in accordance with the agreement. In view of this statement, this application is liable to be allowed. 3. In the circumstances and with the agreement of the parties, the fresh disputes and differences are also referred to the same arbitral tribunal with the clarification that the entire claim will be restricted to twenty per cent of the contract value to be determined in accordance with the agreement. 4. The Arbitration Application is, accordingly, disposed of.