1 ca14573/10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Civil Application No. 14573 of 2010 (Shashikant Joshi & Ors. v. Vishwanath Dhappadhule) in Second Appeal No. 688 of 2010 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. Prashant Deshmukh, Advocate for the applicants Mr. V.M. Kagne, Advocate for the respondent PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The Second Appeal is already admitted. The concurrent findings of the Courts below is that the respondent / plaintiff has proved that he is owner and possessor of the land. 3. The learned Advocate appearing for the applicants / appellants is pressing this application for keeping the effect of the impugned Judgment and decree in abeyance. The impugned Judgment and decree declared respondent / plaintiff as owner and possessor of the suit property. However, during pendency of both the proceedings i. e. before the trial Court and before 2 ca14573/10 the first appeal Court, the respondent / plaintiff could not get protection of an order of temporary injunction for he could not show that he was in exclusive possession of the suit property. In view of this, the effect of the impugned Judgment and decree shall remain in abeyance till disposal of the second appeal. In view of above, C.A. stands disposed of. 4. Hearing of the appeal is expedited. 17th Aug. 2011 ( A.V.NIRGUDE, J. ) SRM/