1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.606 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.783 OF 2010 Smt.Indumati Sampat ..Appellant V/s. Municipal Corporation of ..Respondents Greater Mumbai & ors Mr.Jayesh Trivedi, Advocate, for the Appellant Smt.K.K.Soraan, Advocate, for the MCGM CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 16TH JUNE, 2010 P.C. . Not on board. 2. Mentioned. 3. Taken on board. 4. This Appeal is directed against the Order passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court at Dindoshi, Mumbai, refusing to grant 2 ad-interim relief. The Order is well reasoned. The Order shows that the Plaintiff had adequate opportunity to place her case before the Corporation. The learned Judge also observed that the documents tendered by the Plaintiff were not enough to conclude that the structure is prior to datum line i. e. 19th April, 1964. The photographs tendered with the plaint were not enough to substantiate that the structure is authorized. There is no error in the refusal of ad-interim relief. The Appeal is, therefore, dismissed. 5. In view of dismissal of the Appeal from Order, Civil Application does not survive and the same is disposed of accordingly. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)