1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR LPA NO. 339 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2478 OF 2009 (Sau. Vijay Vishwasrao Khadse vs. Zilla Parishad, Washim & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & F.M. REIS, JJ. AUGUST 13, 2009. Heard Shri Dhatrak, learned counsel for the appellant. The effort is to show that the proceedings in which the appellant is shown as absent, are all fabricated and not genuine. We find that this plea was not raised specifically before the first authority i.e. the President Zilla Parishad and thereafter in appeal before the Additional Commissioner. The effort was also made before the learned Single Judge and the learned Single Judge found that the contention that the appellant was present in two meetings was not raised by the petitioner/ appellant before the Additional Commissioner, Amravati in appeal. Shri Dhatrak, learned counsel wants to rely upon copy of proceedings annexed as Annexure “E” at page 41. He also invited our attention to communication dated 28.2.2009 written by the 2 Secretary of Gram Panchayat to Sarpanch, informing that the proceedings book, attendance register and Meeting register for the year 2006-07 and 2007-08 is not available with him from 1.4.2008. All these documents raise a disputed question, which cannot be gone into for the first time by this Court. Shri Patil, learned counsel for respondent No. 3 is seeking time to assist this Court. Shri Sambre, learned Government Pleader is present for respondent No.2. In the circumstances, we are not inclined to interfere in the matter, Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.