IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M 31697 of 2009 Date of decision: 22.1.2010 Manoj and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARBANS LAL Present: Mr.Rajkapoor Malik, Advocate for the petitioners Mr.Lekh Raj Nandal, AAG, Haryana *** Harbans Lal, J.(Oral) This petition has been moved by Manoj and Manjeet under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking their regular bail in case FIR No. 115 dated 9.6.2009 registered under Sections 307, 34, 120-B of IPC and Sections 25/54/59 of the Arms Act at PS Sadar Kaithal. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the offence punishable under Section 307 of IPC has not been attributed to either the petitioner and they are in custody since 3.7.2009. This fact has not been denied by ASI Shiv Kumar, Investigating Officer through the learned State counsel. The trial is not likely to be concluded within a measurable distance of time. Bail to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaithal. January 22, 2010 (Harbans Lal) gsv Judge