IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21894 of 2011 Madhu Kumari Versus Jitendra Kumar & Ors ---------------------------------- 03. 15.12.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has filed this application against the order dated 09.11.2011 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna in Matrimonial Case No.761 of 2009 whereby the learned Court below allowed the application filed by the respondent no.4 for being added as defendant in the matrimonial case. It appears that the present petitioner filed the application under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act claiming herself to be the legally wedded wife of the respondent no.1. In that proceeding, the respondent no.4 appeared and filed application that she should be added as party because she is the legally wedded wife of the respondent no.1. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the learned Court below has allowed the application of respondent no.4. In view of the above facts, I do not find any jurisdictional error committed by the Court below and, therefore, this writ application is dismissed. Saurabh (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)