IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12103 of 2007 Between: Vallurupalli Nageswara Rao … Petitioner AND The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate, Lakidikapool, Hyderabad & another. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri M.M.M. Srinivasa Rao Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Home This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12103 of 2007 ORDER:- At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. In this writ petition, the petitioner sought for police protection from the Directors of M/s. Seetharama Housing Private Limited. In his affidavit, the petitioner narrated certain incidents said to have taken place on 12.05.2007 and 26.05.2007, which are made basis for him to entertain the apprehension that he and his family members are facing threat to their lives. In the counter affidavit filed by respondent No.1, he stated that the petitioner got a private complaint filed against the Director of M/s. Seetarama Housing Private Limited, which was referred to Saroornagar Police Station and Crime No.246 of 2007 was registered on 05.03.2007 and that it is also revealed that Crime Nos.358 of 2006 and 513 of 2006 were registered by the Saifabad Police, Hyderabad against the petitioner and another on the complaints filed by the Directors of Seetharama Housing Private Limited. It is further averred that the Sub-Inspector of Police, Penamaluru police station enquired into the allegations made by the petitioner with respect to the incidents said to have taken place on 12.05.2007 and 26.05.2007 and the said enquiry revealed that no such incidents took place. It is further stated that the alleged incident dated 28.05.2007 was also found to be false. In paragraph 7 of the counter affidavit, respondent No.1 categorically stated that there is no danger to the life of the petitioner and that it is only on account of civil disputes between the parties, that the cases are being filed by them in order to harass each other and that proceedings under Section 107 Cr.P.C. have been initiated against both the parties in Crime No.273 of 2007. The petitioner has not filed any reply affidavit denying the above averments contained in the counter affidavit. Since the respondents, after proper enquiry, found that there is no threat perception against the petitioner and his family members, I am not inclined to grant any relief in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.15065 of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 30.04.2008 ES