C.W.P. No.87 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.87 of 2010 Date of Decision: 22.12.2010 Dr. Madan Lal Kaushal ……Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ……Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI -.- Present: Petitioner in person. Mr. A.S. Jattana, Addl. A. G., Punjab. Mr. H.S. Brar, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. G.S. Attariwala, Advocate for respondent No.4. Mr. Vikas Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.6. Mr. Rajesh Garg, Advocate for respondent No.7. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) Learned Counsel for respondent No.6 states that C.W.P. No.87 of 2010 -2- respondent No.6 will remove the offending tower and its ancillary equipments from the common wall of the petitioner within a period of 3 months from today. The petitioner who is present in person states that though he is satisfied with this interim relief yet he deserves compensation and damages. In my opinion that question is beyond the scope of writ jurisdiction and the petitioner, if so advised, may seek alternate remedy for the same. Learned Counsel for respondents No.3 and 7 state that partial removal would not be permissible. That is also a matter between the GMADA and respondent No.6. They may also, if so advised, seek alternate remedy for the same. This petition is thus disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.6 to faithfully implement its undertaking. Liberty is granted to the petitioner and respondents No.3 and 7 as mentioned above. ( AJAY TEWARI ) December 22, 2010 JUDGE ashish