IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 17-06-2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.371 of 2007 (O.A.No.124 of 2001) P.Manoharan .. Petitioner. Versus The Commissioner of Employment & Training, Chepauk, Chennai-5. .. respondent. Prayer: Original Application No.124 of 2001 filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, on abolition, transferred to the file of this Court and renumbered as Writ Petition No.371 of 2007, seeking for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the order of the respondent, dated 29.11.2000, issued in the Rc.No.TP2/65230/2000, calling for the candidates from the Employment Exchange statewide seniority list and quash the same and direct the respondent to fill the vacancies in the post of junior Training Officer basing on the District wide employment exchange seniority. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Thennan For respondent : Mr.V.Arun Additional Government Pleader O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 2. This writ petition has been filed to call for the records relating to the order of the respondent, dated 29.11.2000, made in Rc.No.TP2/65230/2000, calling for the candidates from the employment exchange, based on State-wide seniority list. It has also been prayed that the respondent may be directed to consider the name of the petitioner to be appointed in the post of Junior Training Officer, on the basis of the State-wide Employment Exchange seniority. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, it has been brought to the notice of this Court that a Division Bench of this Court, in the decision reported in Unemployed Secondary Grade Teachers Welfare Association V. The State of Tamil Nadu & Another (2008 Writ.L.R. 747), had held that in view of the provisions contained under Article 14, 16 and 19 of the Constitution of India, no person can be denied equality of opportunity in employment on the ground of residence alone. Hence, the recruitment of candidates based on State-wide seniority cannot be said to be invalid. In the judgment reported in M.Ramesh Kumar V. Secretary to Govt. (2008(8) MLJ 867), a learned Single Judge of this Court, had followed the dictum laid down by the Division Bench. 4. In such circumstances, this Court finds no reason to interfere with the impugned proceedings of the respondent, dated 29.11.2000. Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar csh To The Commissioner of Employment and Training, Chepauk, Chennai-5. 1 cc To The Government Pleader, SR.24093 Writ Petition No.371 of 2007 MG {CO} TP/15.7.2009. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/