IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY THURSDAY, THE 17TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 28TH MAGHA 1932 WA.No. 1912 of 2010() -------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.29107/2010 Dated 06/10/2010 .................... APPELLANT(S): PETITIONER(PARTY IN PERSON) IN WPC 29107/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ADV.M.P.CHOTHY,MACHERIKKUDY HOUSE, PATTAL-PANIKULAM ROAD,PERUMBAVOOR VILLAGE, IRINGOLE PO,PIN 683 548. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.CHOTHY RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS IN WPC 29107/10 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHPAURAM-1. 2. STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSHKUMAR THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss C.N.Ramachandran Nair & Bhabani Prasad Ray, JJ. ==================================== W.A.No.1912 of 2010 ==================================== Dated this the 17th day of February, 2011. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Heard the appellant who appeared in person and argued the matter. The prayer is for direction to the respondents to grant permission to the appellant to prosecute Muncipal Secretary and police officers for alleged violation of Section 7 (d) of the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955 and violation of the provisions of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Appellant's main grievance is that Muncipal Secretary, who is not even made a party, refused to shake hands with appellant when he offered. Learned single Judge has considered the allegations of the appellant and found that the appellant has not made out a prima facie case. We do not find any ground to interfere with the judgment of the learned WA1912/10 -:2:- single Judge. There is no merit in this appeal. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed. C.N.Ramachandran Nair, Judge. Bhabani Prasad Ray, Judge. sl.