gst 1 fa1252.10-grp.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. FIRST APPEAL NO. 1252 OF 2010 WITH FIRST APPEAL NOS. 615/10, 1354/10 & 1355/10. The Secretary Rukhi Mahal Coop.Hsg.Soc. Ltd. ... .... ...Appellant. V/s Bharat Shantilal Mehta & Anr. .... ... .... ..Respondents. Mr.N.K.Madnaney, Adv. For the appellant. Mr.Vinod Mahadik, Adv. For BMC. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. 15th September, 2010. PC: Admit. All the appeals to be heard together. Hearing expedited. gst 2 fa1252.10-grp.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2792 OF 2010 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2795 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NOS. 1354/10 & 1355/10. The Mun. Corpn. Of Gr. Bombay ... .... ...Applicant. V/s Bharat Shantilal Mehta & Anr. & Elizbeth Vincent Fernandes & Anr. ... ... .... ..Respondents. Mr.N.K.Madnaney, Adv. For the appellant. Mr.Vinod Mahadik, Adv. For BMC. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. 15th September, 2010. PC: By way of present applications the applicant/appellant seeks stay of the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court. 2. Learned trial Court has decreed the suit of the respondent/plaintiffs thereby declaring that the notice dated 1.9.2005 impugned in the suit and the order issued by the Corporation dated 15.9.05 are illegal and void. 3. In the event the applications of the appellant is granted it will be allowing the appeal at this stage without adjudication of the rights of the parties on merits. In that view of the matter applications are rejected.