IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 5TH JULY 2007 / 14TH ASHADHA 1929 WP(C).No. 3010 of 2004(G) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- INDIRA DEVI, AGED 56 YEARS, W/O.OF THE LATE K.G.RAVICHANDRAN, ELENJIVILAKOM HOUSE, MANGALAPURAM, THONNAKKAL P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.M.PREM SMT.K.P.SANTHI RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED, LPG BOTTLING PLANT, KAZHAKUTTOM, TRIVANDRUM 695 582. 2. THE DISTRIBUTORSHIP SELECTION COMMITTEE, BHARATH PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED, P.B.NO.6, KAZHAKKUTTOM, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN, SC, BPC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 3010/2004 G APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION INVITING APPLICATIONS PUBLISHED in the MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY DT. 23/2/2002. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE LETTER DT. 18/10/2003 OF THE R3 CALLING THE PETITIONER FOR INTERVIEW ON 12/11/2003. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DT. 26/7/2001 BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TRIVANDRUM RURAL. EXT.P4. COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT DT. 11/11/2003 BY THE PETITIONER AT THE TIME OF INTERVIEW. EXT.P5. COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 12/11/2003 OF THE R2. EXT.P6. COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION THAT APPEARED IN THE MALAYALA MANORAMA DT. 25/1/2004. True copy tga Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. =================================== W.P.(C)No.3010 of 2004 =================================== Dated this the 5th day of July, 2007. JUDGMENT This writ petition is filed seeking to quash Ext.P5 and for a declaration that the petitioner is eligible and qualified to be appointed as Retail Outlet Dealer of LPG products at Arookutty. The first respondent has filed a statement to the effect that the impugned Ext.P5 is a fake document. It is further stated that the petitioner and one Santhakumari Amma applied for being considered. They were found eligible and therefore called for interview on 12-11-2003 and after the interview, they were found to be not suitable. Accordingly, Ext.R1(a) was immediately published on the notice board. That document reflects that the candidates are not suitable. Under such circumstances, nothing survives in this writ petition. It is hence dismissed. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. sl. -:2:- Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. =================================== W.P.(C)No.3010 of 2004 =================================== JUDGMENT Dated:5-7-2007