IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1005 OF 2009 (SS) Smt. Anita Sangappa …….Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. .Respondents. Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand / respondents. 14th October, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Advocate for petitioner and Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand / respondents. The case of the petitioner is that she was transferred earlier by order dated 25.7.2008 and now the petitioner is being relieved after a period of 14 months vide order dated 29.9.2009. It is not clear under what circumstances, the relieving order of the petitioner was not passed. These contingencies are not before this Court, nor have been stated in the writ petition. The transfer is an exigency of service. There is no allegation of malafide or violation of any statute in the writ petition. Therefore, no interference is called for by this Court. However, in case the petitioner makes a representation before the Secretary, Department of Education, Dehradun, the same shall be considered and disposed of as expeditiously as possible. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 14.10.2009 Rathour