IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1572 of 2011 1. SUREN PASWAN, SON OF SHYAMLAL PASWAN 2. RABINDRA PASWAN, SON OF SHYAMLAL PASWAN 3. DURGI DEVI, WIFE OF SUREN PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 24.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners seek their bail in connection with Araria P.S. Case No. 168 of 2010 registered under Sections 302,201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The First Information Report would demonstrate that none of the person has seen the actual killing of the deceased and it appears from the First Information Report that a suspicion has been raised against the petitioners on the ground that prior to the alleged occurrence petitioner no. 1 Suren Paswan had fled away along with petitioner no. 3, namely, Durgi Devi on account of which differences arose between the parties and petitioner no. 1 had given threatening of dire consequences. The impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge also discloses the above stated facts and apart from the aforesaid material there is nothing against the petitioners. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with above stated Araria P.S. Case No. 168 of 2010. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)