1 AO 394-2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 394 OF 2010 Mr.Faizal Salim Kungale & Ors. ...Appellants vs. Mrs.Afroz Shakir Gangre & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Sandesh D. Patil for the Appellants. Mr.Rajesh Datar for Respondent No.1. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATED : JANUARY 13, 2011 P.C :- 1 Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2 The appellant challenges the order dated 14th October, 2009 passed by the 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kalyan. 3 There is an interim order operating almost for a period one year and three months. I find that it would not be in the interest of justice to 2 AO 394-2010 interfere with the said order at this stage. I am of the view that the interest of justice would be met by directing the learned trial court to dispose of the suit, as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of one year from today. 4 It is made clear that the learned trial court would not be influenced by the observations made by him in granting temporary injunction to the respondent and would decide the suit on the basis of evidence led before him by the parties. 5 Appeal is disposed of. In view of the disposal of the appeal, nothing survives in the Civil Application No.517 of 2010. Same is also disposed of. (B.R. GAVAI, J.)