IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADHYA PRADESH l JABALPUR W.P^No. $T^^7 OF 1996 PETITIONSRs Western India Plywood Ltd<, Reglstered Office:BallIpatain PO Kannur-670010 (Kerala State). VERSUS RESPONDENTS! l^ AiatMorlty under Pa^roent of Wages Act (Labonr Court)^ <7agdalpur<, 2» Znspector, Under payment of Wages Act, 198 6 Office. of Asstt^Labour Commissw «.ioner, Ralpur» ^3^JBaEiagijQg--8^TFecter ^ ^B4jniiding ^Eancham Tal, Mai^iya ! Ma^aj^-yJBteo^cA^— 4^ CMef Exectitive Officer, Throtighs Narmada Porest Ind^istrles ^Near Central Library^ Bhopal^ 6» Conservator of Forest, Through: DirectQroBastar Wood Pvt»Ltd.^Jagdalpur^ PSTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 -Ol-IHE-CONSTrrUTION ~OP INDIA- II tfifB •?k. r^. vwys"v~^ ^».^ Y'\ ^- ^II HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 5347 of 1996 Petitioner Westera India Pfywood Ltd, & aaother Versus Respondents Aufhority under F^yment ofWages Act aiid others Sixigle Beach : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satlsh K. Agaihotri. Shii P. S. Koshy, Advocate for the petitiouer No. 1. None for fhe petitioner No.2. "%^^ Smt, Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govt Advocate for the rcs{X)ndents No. 1, 2 aad 5. None for fhe respondent No,5. ORAL ORDBR (15t31June,2006) The followmg order of the Court was passed by Satish K. Agiiihotri, J. 1. Learned counsel appearmg for the petitioner No. 1 submite fhat earUer fhe iastant petitioa was fUed by fhe petitioner No. 1 only, aad on an appHcation (I.A.No. 1669-W/98) j61ed by the respondent No,3, vide order dated 13.5,1998, passed by fhis Court, fhe naxne ofrespondent No,3 was traasposed as petitioner No.2. He further submits that now the petition is to be prosecuted by the petitioner No.2 only. 2. The inatter is caUed for hearing twice, On bofh the occasions, none appeai^ nor aiiy reprcsentation is niade on behalf of fhe petitioner No.2. 3, In view of the above, fhe petition staads dismissed for want ofproseciition. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge