THE HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.21601 OF 2009 Dt.09.10.2009 Between: MD.Ibrahim ……………Petitioner Vs. A.P.S.R.T.C., rep. By its VC & MD, Musheerabad, Hyderabad And another. ……….Respondents. O R D E R: Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in re-fixing the pay of the petitioner by restoring the deferred increments after completion of punishment period, this writ petition is filed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the Corporation. Admittedly, the petitioner has already made a representation, dt.15.02.2009 ventilating his grievance and the same is pending before the second respondent. In the circumstances, the interference by this court at this stage is not warranted. Instead, I deem it appropriate to direct the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dt.15.02.2009 in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ___________ G.ROHINI J., Dt.09.10.2009 tjs