IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2009 / 21ST JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 16134 of 2009(J) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. MANOJ MATHEW, S/O.P.V.MATHEW, AGED 23 YEARS, RESIDING AT PUTHENPARAMBIL HOUSE, 31/2115, THAMMANAM P.O., COCHIN-32, NOW RESIDING AT 1A, ABAD CLOUDS-9, VIDYA NAGAR, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, COCHIN-20. 2. NIKHIL. C., CHANGARANGATH HOUSE, PULLAZHI, OLARI, THRICHUR. 3. KANNAN.R., SREEPADMOM, KAIPATTOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. MR.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.P.C. SASIDHARAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/06/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Rs/ V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No.16134 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 11th June,2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioners, who have completed their Engineering Degree Course from a college affiliated to the University of Calicut, had written the 4th and 6th Supplementary Examinations held in June 2008. Apparently, dissatisfied by the marks obtained in the examinations, they had applied for revaluation. They are aggrieved that the results of the revaluation have not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the Supplementary Examinations held in June 2008. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioners in relation to the 4th and 6th Semester Supplementary Examinations held in June 2008, as early as possible, at any rate, within W.P ( C) No.16134 of 2009 2 a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the applications for revaluation are in order and otherwise correct. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.16134 of 2009 3 W.P ( C) No.16134 of 2009 4 (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.16134 of 2009 5 W.P ( C) No.16134 of 2009 6