T PETSTSON (C} N0. 4354 of 2007 MohanlaS Jhikram aged bout 90 years, S/o Late Shivsahay Jhikram Ri'o Badi Khajri, Mana'ia versus £.. 3. Chandra Prakash Bajpai, aged about 47 years, S/o PandiS Ganga Pd. Bajpai, R/o 27 Khoii, V'kas Nagar, Biiaspur (C.G.) State of Chhaitisgarh through: Secrefary, Ministry of Triba! Weifare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur »s?. 5. Registrar, Firms And Society, MP Vindyachal Bhawan, Bhopa! MP M.P. Vanvasi Sewa Mandai, Through Secretary, M.P. Vanwasi Sewa Manda!, Maharajpur, Mandia M.P. Divislon Officer, M.P. Vanvasi Sev/a EWandai, Kapil Nagar, Muktidham Road, Sarkanda, Bilaspur (C.G.) Kaiiash Chandra Jain, So caiied President; M.P. Vanwasi Sewa Mandai, Mandla, R/o Sat iharitya Sadan, Dindori (M.P.) Hon'ble Shri Justice Satish K. Agnihotrij ssent:- Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel !av/yer for the State. I. a S..i-3'u3:SrT-H 'v^n thss 7'" day of August, 2007) ~he petitioners claim to be a iife member of the respondent No. 4 Society having its headquarter at Mandia, State of Madhya Pradesh. 2. According to iearned counsei for the petitioners, the respondent No. 4 Secretary to M.P. Vanwasi Sewa Mandai, Mandla has conciucted office bearers of the Society pursuant to the order (Annexure P/4) passed by the Registrar of Societies, "hereafter, the respondent No. 6 who ciaims to be of M.P. Vanwasi Sewa Mandai, Mandla has the election of daied 3.4.2007 .hnniaai (M.i-1.). 1 z 5. conducted the eiection of office bearers on his own, without any instructions/ordei' from any authority. Thus, the eiection conducted bythe respondent No. 6 be declared as bad and invaiid. 3. It is admitted case of the petitioners that the Government authorities have not passed any order on the basls of the eiection allegedly conducted by ihe respondent No. 6. The eiection conducted by the respondent No. 4 on the basis of the order dated 3.4.2007 is a valid te that as it may, She grievance of She petitioners is against the respondent No. 6 vvho ciaims to be the President of the respondent No. 4 Society registered under the Societies Registration Act. The writ petition deserves to be dismissed on two grounds. Firstiy, the cause of acfion arose in the State or Madhya Pradesh, as the ordsr dated 3.4.2007 was passed by the Registrar, Firms and Societies, Bhopai and headquarter of the Soclety is at Mandla and holding second election by the respondeni No. 6 without any authority does not create any cause of action v/ithin the territoriai jurisdiction of fhe State of Chhattisgai'h. Secondly, the petitioners are noi in a position to estabiish as which iegal right of the petitioners have been infringed by an action of a private pariy, who has purportedly conductsd the eiection unauthorizely. There is no sembiance of any iegai right or breach thereof. 6. For the reasons aforementioned, the writ petition is dismissed summanty. Sd/- Satish K. Ag Judae