IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12970 of 2009 1. VIKRAM MANDAL 2. MANISH MANDAL @ MANISH KUMAR 3. PARSURAM MANDAL 4. ARUN MANDAL 5. AJIT MANDAL--------PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 3.9.3009 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the Counsel appearing for the State. The Petitioners are apprehending theirarrest in connection with complaint case No. 359C/2008, instituted for an offences under Sections 147, 333,379,448 of the Indian Penal Code and 3(X) (XI) and 2 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Atrocities of Prevention) Act. Counsel for the petitioners submits that initially Barhat P.s. case No. 47 of 2008 was filed in which provisions of S.C. & S.T. Act was not mentioned and subsequently the present complaint case has been filed to make the case more serious, including S.C. & S.T. Act. It has also been stated that the allegations do not make out any offence under Section 3(X_) (XI) and 2 of the S.C. & S.T. Act. Considering these facts, the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the above named petitioners is allowed. Let the petitioners surrender before the Court - 2 - below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Jamui in Complaint case No. 359C of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar