•fiw: •, ^/ . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURLAI-^ILASPUR CC.G.) f< j'- 0^' r/- APPELLANTS: CLAIMANTS ^? ^;^£ '^•"" .0°,s'' RESPONDENTS : NON-CLAIMANTS. M.A. ra \J(5^1 /2oc 1. Smt. Rambha Bai yVd/o late Sunderlal Dadsena, agsd about 38 years. 2. Upendra Kumar Dadsena S/o late Sunder'al Dadsena, aged about 18 years. 3. Ku. Reena Dadsena D/o late Sunderlal Dadsena, sged about 16 years. 4. Kamalkant Dadsena S/o late Sunderlal Dadsena, aged about 14 years. Minor Appei'ant No. 3 and 4, Through : legal guardian Appellant No. 1, Mother Smt. Rambha Bai. All R/o Subhash Nagar, Kukaripara, Thana Purani Basti, Raipur, Tahsi! and District Raipur (C.G.) Versys 1. Rajendra Rajput S/o Bhavs'ngh Rajput aged about ^6 years, Occupation Vehicle Driver, R/o Sarangarh, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Baljeet Singh Ahuja S/o Surjeet Singh Ahuja, Occupation Bus Owner, R/o Main Raod Sankara, District Mahasamund C.G. 3. The New Ind'a Insurance Company Limited, Through : Divisional Manager, Divisional Office No. 1, Kutchery Chowk, Jail Road, Raipur (C.G.) Miscellanceous Appeal under Sectlon 173 of the Motor Vehicie Act. 1994 rHC-22 ^ ^IT^T^T tqil^ sniRT 5r>*iici'» <if^a 11*IC11 ^Sf '^FTT^PT, ^Til^4l^, I®l<ni<iy 3Tlif?T 'q^R _.^.A.;^)..^.A^1J_ .... ^^^.;...........«.......,....^.......^200<) •^C^T"""""""""" 3TI^T ^<TTW ^%a S,B._Hon!bSeShn,JustjceN.K.Ai t6^2-2QQQ . - -; ; Shri S.C. Verma, coynsel .counseifortheappelEants..,',, - . Shri Hanuman Prasad Agra' Heard' on I.A. No.01, filing tne appeal. ., : On due consideratlon, I ;am succeeded in expiainjng the cau Therefore, the appjication j's atlow the appeai is hereby condoned; Heardonadmjssjon. This ;is claimants' app cQmpensation in the awaixl dal Addjtlonaj iViotor Accicient Cjalms 1 'the Tribunal') in Ctaim Case No.; an amount of Rs.3,13,800/- has b account.of. comp^risation 1br :the Dadsena in the accident dated 03-j The facts brlefly stated as ui Sunder Lai Dadsena (sino traveiing in the Bus bearing reg passenger. At about 12.00 O'Cloc rash and negiig^nt driving of ths deceased was seriously irijured; w on 09-05-2006. Po!ice Station, cb^(<n<j1vi ^w^S ^^^ <Fn^i< ^ 3Tf;<P7 3n^?T larwal aiQng with Shri Adltya KhaN. vaj, counsel for respondent No.3. ;atjon. for condonation of de!ay;in that the -have se of delay in flling the appeai. ed; and the dejay caused in -filjng sal seeklng • enhancemsnt -:of ed 02-05-2008 passed by Vlli 'ribuna!;(F.T.C.), Raipur (for short 6/2007 whereby and whereunder een awarded. to the ':c{almants on death "6f deceased Suriyer' Lal )5-2006.: •• ";• " :i" "! '" ' ider: 5 deceased) on 03-05-2006 was istration No. C.G. 06-B/6005 ©s <, the said bus turned turtle due to driver of the bus in which the as taken to hospital; there he died Pithora Feglstered criminal case flC-22 3TT^?T'^T ^Jcb 3T1^T ^^ior»^fia -l- 's^i ^ww^) ^Ti1<i<i<o, (®«ni<i^< 3TT^T ^^ ^, ^i^di 9btiicby'*"*<'"<"a"""***""**"*'"^n 20° T f^^ST' agalnst the ;driver of the bus. representatives of the decea; compensation ;for the death of :owner'.and Irjsurance Company -o appjjcation under Section 166 of stheAct'). The learned Tribunal on materiai piaced on. record and-su Rs.3,13,800/- in favour of the ai rospondents.for its: payrrtent.. Learned counsel appearin! .thattne-.award passed by.the }.ean side which deserves to be enhanc 1 have heard fearned cou award^m.pugned and.the .record o1 Jhe Jearned. Tri.bynaj as Rs.2,800/- p.m.; the age of ths was 50 years; iooklng to the age, .!l/3rd. .towards. personai ...expense^ Rs.2,68,800/- towards loss of further awarded Rs.45,000/- on Rs.3,13,800/- as compensation Tnbunai further awarded interest annum frQm the date of applicatior The Income has besn ass the basls of evldence addyced 1 fauEted ws'th. Looking to the a| GbNfd^l'1 W^ Tt 'feT3t <rai^i< ^T ^TPcFT 3|n^?T Fhe appeilants/clalmants i.e, legal ted claimed Rs.13,25,090/- as the deceasedsgainstithe driver, fthe offending vehiGle by;fillng;an 1 iKe -Moior- Vehlcjes ^Act • (¥or short ^ close ^crutjny -of ^evidence-1 Jed, t)missions made, passed award of |pe!!ants; fastening • E-iabifity • on the fe- for the: .appeiiants ^v^oujd submit |eci Tribynaj is shockingly on lower ^ . ^ .- - !- ,! 1.;..-^1 i|isej for: the 'parties, perused the |the..TribLenaI. : ... . • assetsed. .th.e income. of the. deceased deceased at the time of accident lapplled the multiplier 12; deducted t ..of.. the: ..deceased. .-and ..awarded d^pendency. The learned Tribunai other...heads .and th.us.. awarded |to. the ciaimants. The. learned |on the said amount @ 7.5% per tiji Its recovery. ss^ssed by the iearned TribunaE on ^y the claimants which cannot be fie 6f the deceased, the Eearned :HC-22 sn^r^T W\<^ ^T^[ $r»+iiGr»<i^a Kvr •^sf ^l^lld^l, ^^1<i<Ko, (®i<rti<i^< Hl^dl 9b*licb 3n^?r '<^ra? ^M^::.^^.^.l -^. ^........:...:............;........^ ^<^ f^ST' ? 37T^T'^RITW^Tf^ TrEbunai has rlghtEy appiied the :Tribuna! has rightiy calcuiated:the| found in it. .In a motor-acddent.ciajnil ^otor-VehIdes Act, 1988, what. is| .:fo:' be awarded ,by. the.Court&Tfl -mmpensatlon. En ..the | a n.or.charlty....;...- . -' For.. the. reasons .mentlbn^ •scope, for enhancement. of :.th^ .TrlbunaE.... ...: . .; .....:... ....'.- -The .fjled:.by.. tha....| .compensatson. Is.therefore .Ijable admlssion .No-.ord.er as^to c^ chi€if<n<i1i ^H<nT'^T^'^l <r3i«^i< ^>37f;<TRT3n^T muitlpijer. of 15' 'and. compensation anct no fauiS oan;-be •case, .as .per: Section-1@8- of'-the iniportaRtjs.that..the;compensat{on bunal shouid.: be. just1. and proper; of. eacii -case.. •1t is. ^.^hereinabove, I do.not find any' •compensatlon awardedl-.by. tne'. ippeljant for enhancement of the to, be. and is .hereby .d.ismissed at N.K. Agrawal Judge [Tft^ ^fe^