IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3623 of 2010 PAPPU TIWARY @ GUGAN TIWARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. 01.02.2010 Heard. The F.I.R. was lodged under Section 467, 468, 470, 471 and 420/511 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation was that the petitioner along with co-accused Ajit Kumar went to P.N.B. at Aurangabad and presented a cheque which is said to have been issued in favour of one Sudershan Ram but the stamp of the Panchayat Secretary who had issued the cheque was put just upside down on the cheque and some difference also appeared in the signature as a result of which the bank officials got suspicious and they apprehended the petitioner and handed over him to police and lodged the F.I.R. The learned counsel for the petitioner, as also asserted in para-11 of the petition states that the said Sudershan Ram in whose favour the cheque was issued has stated in para-44 of the case diary that he had received the cheque for that amount toward payment to him as honorarium and the same was earlier presented before the bank but bank officials had returned the cheque with an endorsement “stamp wanting” and that he had sent the cheque to the Panchayat Secretary of the Gram Panchayat who had asked his son to put the stamp and his son had put the stamp in a wrong manner and thereafter, the cheque was presented that in such way which caused suspicion. Mr. S. R. Haque, the learned A.P.P. does not point out any other material against the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, - 2 - Pappu Tiwary @ Gugan Tiwary is admitted to bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in Risiup P.S. Case No. 51 of 2009. (C.M. Prasad, J.) Ravi/-