IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 26TH KARTHIKA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 9080 of 2011() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN, PARASSALA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DT. PETITIONERS/ACCUSED -------------------------------------- 1. RENJITH SINGH, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O.VINCENT, MACHUVILAI, CHENKODI P.O., KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU STATE. 2. VINU PRADEEP SINGH, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.VINCENT, MACHUVILAI, CHENKODI P.O., KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU STATE. 3. VINCY @ VINCY MAKIL RANI, AGED 32 YEARS, W/O.SENTHIL KUMAR, KANNIVILAI, PAMMAM, MARTHANDAM P.O., VILAVANCODE TALUK, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU STATE. 4. SENTHIL KUMAR, AGED 33 YEARS, S/O.MAHALINGAM, KANNIVILAI, PAMMAM, MARTHANDAM P.O., VILAVANCODE TALUK, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU STATE. 5. VINCENT, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O.SILUVAI MUTHU, MACHIVILAI, CHENKODI P.O., KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU STATE. BY ADV. SRI.GOPAKUMAR R.THALIYAL RESPONDENT(S): COMPAINANT ------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682031. BY P.P.SRI.R.RANJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bail Appl. NO.9080 OF 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of November, 2011 O R D E R The petitioner apprehends arrest in a crime registered by Parassala Police Station, against the petitioner alleging offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, at the instance of the wife of the petitioner. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that no crime is registered against the petitioner under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that crime No.1231/2011 was registered against the petitioner at Parassala Police Station for the offences under Section 341 and 323 of Indian Penal Code. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the aforesaid offences being bailable, the application for anticipatory bail is not maintainable. Accepting the submissions made by the learned Public B.A.No9080/2011 -2- Prosecutor, the bail application is closed with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court again, as and when occasion arises. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE. ds