IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11145 of 2009 1. SINATH RAI 2. LAHASO DEVI 3. KESHARI DEVI ----- Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that for differences in between petitioners and brother of the informant, they have been made accused in a super added allegation of the offence under section 380 IPC which also is compromised. Petitioners’ arrest cannot be justified. I agree with the same. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in ARA (M) P.S.Case No.30 of 1989, the above named three petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI