IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. LPA No. 132 of 2010. Decided on: 28.09.2011. Ramesh Dogra … Appellant. Versus HRTC and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, C. J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. For the Appellant : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Writ petitioner is appellant. The issue pertains to the grant of senior scale and recovery on account of re-fixation of pay. Learned single Judge though declined to grant senior scale, has granted order in favour of the petitioner, so far as recovery is concerned. Hence, the appeal. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant points out that this Court had considered a similar situation, leading to Annexure A-2, judgment, which has attained finality. But, it is unfortunate that - 2 - Annexure A-2, has not been brought to the notice of learned single Judge while considering CWP (T) No. 2447 of 2008, leading to judgment under appeal. 3. The appeal is disposed of, as follows:- In case, Annexure A-2, judgment has been accepted in principle and the same has been implemented by the Corporation, similar treatment shall be given to the appellant herein also. To that extent only, the judgment under appeal would stand modified. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice September 28, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (sck/pankaj) Judge.