IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.21609 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 22.11.2011 Union of India & others ... Petitioners versus Chandigarh Administrative Tribunal & another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA Present : Mr. P.C.Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners. **** Permod Kohli, J.(Oral) This petition is directed against the orders dated 08.03.2011(Annexure P-3) and 08.07.2011 (Annexure P-5) passed by Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred as 'Tribunal') Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh in OA No.473/Pb. of 2009 and RA No.51 of 2011 respectively. Briefly stated, the facts necessary for disposal of the present petition are that respondent No.2 filed an OA before the Tribunal claiming financial up-gradation under the ACP Scheme of 1999. He claimed the first financial up-gradation in the scale of ` 6,500-10,500/- and second up-gradation in the pay scale of 7,450- 11,500/-. The Tribunal vide impugned judgment allowed the claim of respondent No.2 on the basis of earlier judgment of the Tribunal in the case of Budhi Singh Dhiman & another vs. Union of India & others. A review filed against the judgment dated 08.03.2011 has also been dismissed. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and CWP No.21609 of 2011 (O&M) -2- perused the orders passed by the Tribunal. It is not in dispute that Budhi Singh Dhiman's judgment relied upon by the Tribunal, has attained finality. The case of respondent No.2 was squarely covered by the aforesaid judgment as held by the Tribunal. Not only that Budhi Singh Dhiman's judgment has attained finality, it has been implemented by the appellant therein and the relief has been granted to the beneficiary of the judgment. We do not find any exception to the findings of the Tribunal. No merit. Dismissed. (Permod Kohli) Judge November 22, 2011 (Tejinder Singh Dhindsa) sonia Judge