IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24589 of 2009 PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH, Son of Baleshwar Singh, resident of Village- Anjani, P.S. Parsa, District- Saran..................Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar.................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 02. 03.09.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case is under Section 392 read with Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is named in the First Information Report and well known to the informant. In the First Information Report itself, the informant has said that he was running a Coaching Centre where petitioner was studying and later on due to some reason he was expelled from there. Thereafter the informant had to close the Coaching Centre due to some incidents. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was so well known to the informant that he will not consider to commit such type of crime of snatching of Motor Cycle and taking away Rs. 2000/- from the informant. He submits that in fact due to enmity, the informant has deliberately implicated this petitioner in a false case as at the protest of this petitioner and others on account of misbehavior by the informant with the girl students, the informant had to close the Coaching Centre which had caused heart burning to the informant. He submits that the petitioner has only one case against him from before for bailable offence in which petitioner was granted bail by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chapra, itself as stated - 2 - in paragraph no.12 of the petition. Petitioner is in custody since 21.2.2009 and he is a young student. Considering the above facts and circumstances and considering the age of the petitioner, the petitioner, namely, Pankaj Kumar Singh is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Chapra in connection with Maker P.S. Case No. 3 of 2009, Trial No. 1784 of 2009. U.K. (J.N.Singh,J)