1 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 5560/2008 Bheek Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. Date of order : 20.02.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, for the petitioner. Mr. R.L.Jangid, Addl. Advocate General for respondents. By an application being I.A. No.99/09 the petitioners seek preponing of the date. At the time of filing of the application, the next date was 22.1.2009, since it has already gone and the matter has come today, therefore, there needs hardly any order for preponing the date. The application stands disposed of. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is finally heard at this stage. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in the instant case stands concluded by the decision of this Court in Ram Raj Tada Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others and bunch of writ petitions being SBCW No.4005/2008 decided on 8.8.2008 and in Uda Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors., SBCW No.6084/08 decided on 18.11.2008. This fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the respondents. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is allowed 2 in terms of the order passed by this Court Ram Raj Tada Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors., SBCW No. 4005/08 decided on 8.8.2008 and the respondents are directed to consider candidature of the petitioners for the purpose of appointment to the post of Prabodhak as per the provisions of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Prabodhak Service Rules, 2008 and if the petitioners stand in merit and otherwise eligible, appointment be accorded to them. No costs. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp 3 S.B.Civil Misc. Stay Petition No. 9968/08 In S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 5560/2008 Date of order : 20.02.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, for the petitioner. Since the writ petition itself has been allowed, the stay petition also stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp