IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35650 of 2010 MATHUIRA PANDIT & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 16.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned P.P. for the State. Allegedly, petitioner no.1 sold land of informant in favour of co-accused Sanjeev Kumar. The contention of learned counsel for petitioners is that, as a matter of fact, disputed land was jointly purchased by Mathura Pandit and his brother and subsequently, when partition took place in the family of the aforesaid persons the disputed land fell in the share of the petitioners but informant being great grand son of Indraraj lodged this false case against petitioners. Considering the aforesaid circumstances, petitioners (Mathura Pandit and Jugeshwar Pandit), in the event of their arrest/ surrender within 30 days from the date of communication of the order, be released on bail in connection with Town (Nawada) P.S. Case no. 249 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)