4% PETITIONER HIGH C$URT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETlTlON (C) NO. 4733 OF 20S8 Rajendra Kumar Sama, S/o Late Makhanlal SanNa, aged abuut 45 years, Occupation Advocate, R/o village and post Kareli Choti. Tahsil Magariod, Disirici Dhamtari (CG). Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through .the Secretary, Law and Legislative Affairs Depanment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). State of Chhattisga’rh, ihrough the Additionai Secretary, Law arid Legislative Affairs Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. Disirict Raipur (CG). indramani Parmar, S/o Dhruv Narayan Parmar, aged about 45 vears RJo Kargil Chowk, Megha Road, Ward M15. Post and Tahsil Kurud, District Dham‘iari (CG). Hemani Kumar Sahu. Slo Bishai Ram Sahu, aged about 41 years, R/o Sanjay Nagar, Ward No.1, Post and Tahsit Kurud, District Dhamtari (CG). (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitutian of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present : Shri ‘Awadh Tripathi & Shri Sunil Sahu, caunsei for the petitioner. Shri Alok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate tor the State. RESPONDENTS ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 28‘“ day 0t August, 2008) By this petition, the petitioner impugns the proceedings dated 23—7-2008 (Annexure-P/1) wherein the- names of certain persons have been recommended for appointment. 2) Admittedly, no appointment order has been passed. Unless the appointment order is passed, the decision in a proceeding is not final or binding on the parties, as the same is mere recommendation. 3) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that on receiving a copy of this proceeding under provisions of the Right to information Act, the petitioner has made a representation, which is pending consideration. 4) At this stage, the petition is premature, as no order has been passed appointing any other person as Notary. The petition is accordingly dismissed, at the motion stage itself. 5) Consequently, i.A.No.1/2008 stands dispmed of. / //"/T\,/// $.tsgr\'\"°“‘ $¢l ,. go's“ “or; /