HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU Review Petition No. 83/2010 APPLICANT Rajkumar Singh S/o Shm' B.S. Singh, aged PE’I‘ITIONER about 55 years, R/o Raipur Road, Tifra, Plaintiff Near Kali ,Mandir, Bilaspur, 'Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C. Ga). Versus 1). Smt. Madhuri Singh, W/o Shn' Vijay Pratap Smgh, agad absut 70 ysars, R/a Gamihi Chowk, Bilaspur, Distn'ct Bilaspur (C.G.). Keshav Kumar Singh, S/o Harprasad Singh, aged 76 years, 3) Pm'thwipal Singh, S/o Rameshwar Singh, ‘ aged 63 years, 4) Akhilesh Singh, S/o Indrabhushan Singh, aged 7O years, 5) Rajbahadur Singh, S/o Indrabhushan Singh, aged 53 years; Nilendra Singh, S/o Achal Pratap Singh, aged 30 years, v Rana Anm Singh, S/o Chi’rranjan Singh, aged 53 years, 8) Rana Dinesh Singh, S/o Chitranjan Singh, aged 43 years 9) Rana _Diwakar Singh, S/o Chitranjan Singh, aged 38 years No. 2 to 9 Caste Kshatriya, R/o Akaltara, Tahsil Akaltara, District Janjgir—Champa (ca). Subhash Bhai, S/o Magan Bhai Patel, Caste Gujrati, aged 50 years, R/o Akaltara, Tahsil Akaltar , District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). State of Chhattisgarh through Collector, Jarljgir, District Janjgir-Cha‘mpa (C.G.). NON—APPLICANTS RESPONDENTS Defendants s 2) 6) 7) 10) 11) APPLICATION FOR, REVIEW OF ORDER DATED 22‘072010 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN WP 1227) No. 2564[ZOIO ANNEXURE R 1 . (SB :I-Ion’ble ML. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:— Shn' KA. Ansari, Sr, Advocate with Shri Vipin Singh, Advocate for the applicant] petitioner. Shri Rakesh Jha, Dy. CnA. for the State] respondent No, 11. Respondents No. 1 to 10 not noticed. ' ORAL— ORDER (Passed on 26108120 10) R ‘ Heard, this Court in WP. (227) No. dated 22l7l2010 passed by 256442010. hji K.A. Ansaii, Sr. Advocate for thergppdcantlpe and other material perused. On find any scope in the review petition. By this mview petition pstitioner i$ seeking of the review of the order Advocate with Shri Vipin Singh, titioner and Shri Rakesh Jha, Dy. G.A. for the State] respondent No. 11 are heard. Petition and order dated 22l7/ 20 10 close Scmtixxy; I do not Consequently, this review petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. 5. Sd/— T.P. Sharma Judge S