IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13668 of 2010 SHIV NANDAN JHA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2/ 03/09/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. After some argument, it is submitted that the petitioner proposes to represent against his suspension as he claims to have acted in pursuance of documentary evidence available against Md. Shakir Ansari when no documentary evidence was available against Md. Shahjahan Ansari. These are factual aspects which can be considered appropriately by the District Magistrate himself. If the petitioner represents for revocation of his suspension on the aforesaid grounds it is for the District Magistrate himself alone to consider matters in accordance with law on facts preferably within a maximum period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The application is disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)