IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2714 of 2010 BRAHMESHWAR NATH CHOUHAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 25.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Buxar (T) P.S. case No. 202 of 2007 registered under sections 418, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B)/323/504 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the complainant /informant purchased land through different sale deeds executed in the year 1997 from co-accused Kedar Rai and in these sale deeds petitioner was one of the identifying witness and present complaint case was filed after delay of ten years in the year 2007. According to him petitioner was not the beneficiary from the aforesaid transaction made between the complainant and the co-accused Kedar Rai. Learned counsel for the State pointed out that petitioner was not only an identifying witness but he was a broker also and, therefore, he opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. Be that as it may, in view of delay of about 10 years in lodging the complaint case , let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, , Buxar in the above noted case, - 2 - subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2)Cr.P.C. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) M.Rahman