z^l^^ ^v 'SJ^.3-.K-^':QK.^-;-'"1-' £^"3^SQ--" ^gted—- r ^.^•T^ ' ^a's'SifS-'y-'^l '^%.'.. '7^ •^9S? f^'. 'k'^^6 T^-^y IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILSPUR ^7^. Writ petition [S]No 7 ' '^/2011 PETITIONER : Lalit Narayan Verma Age-32 years,S/o Late Shyam Lal R/o Qt No-3B Street -25, Sector -7 Bhilai, Distt - DURG.(CG) Versus RESPONDENTS: 1- Steal Authority of India Limited ( SAIL ) through it's Chairman, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. r" 2-The General Manager, C.O. 8s C.C.D. Departnient, Bhilai steel Plant, Bhilai, Distt- Durg. (C.G.) , WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OTLINDIA. 1 % ^s'uu& \ HIGH COORT CT' CHHAmSGARH AT BK,j PUR SB : HON'BLB MR. JUSTICB PRITINKBR DXWAiqaEi. W.P.tSi.NO. 3775/2011 Lalit Nerayan Verma versus PETITIQNER RESPONDENTS Steel Authority of India Limited fi»Another, Shri Ashok Vaishnav, counsel for the petftioner. Shri Gautani Bhaduri, Adv. who noragaUy appears for the Steel Authority of India Ltd., present in the Court is directed to appear for the respondents. WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLB 226 OF THB CONSTITUTION CW ISDIA ORDER (15.07.2011) Grievance of the petitioner in the preseat petition is that father of the petitioner died on 19.5.2010 but till date the petitioner has not been givsn conapassionate appointment. Counsel appearing for the petitioner fairiy submits that recently only, on 2.5.11 the application has been made by the petitioner seekinj compassionate appointment and the said application is pending before the competent authority. He further submits that direction may be isaued to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in acoordance with law. Shri Bhaduri submite that the petitioner should have vaitsd far reasonable time after filing of his application and as such he h&s rushed to the Court prematurely. He further submits that in case the application of the petitioner has already not been decided, appropriate order would be passed in acoordance with law. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioaa' is pennitted to withdraw the petition with Bberty to pursue his representation. 'Needless to state that if the application of the petitioner has not been decided the same would be decided in accordance with !aw. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the iiberty as aforesaid. __ Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker ^a Judge ':'