IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4702 of 2010 BINOD DHOBI, SON OF GORAKH DHOBI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6. 22.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution is that after having committed dacoity when the accused persons were fleeing away, three persons were caught on chase, one of which was the petitioner. It has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 11.9.2008 and has no criminal antecedents and also that now five witnesses have been examined during trial out of nine but none of them have supported the case of prosecution. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J., F.T.C. – IV, Buxer, in Sessions Trial No. 185 of 2009 arising out of Koran Sarai P.S. Case No. 40 of 2008 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall 2 also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)