(t- BEFORE THE_HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CKtMINAL APPEAL N0. "? ^ /2005 APPELLANTA DEFENDANT |.'"^ l.t(»^-r....--' lp-F.!5-'ll'^^<->*te ^?^} 4<-5[9 /y RESPONDENTS/ PLAINTIFFS i ^^^7'^ Rajendra Shankar Shukla, aged about 63 years, son of Shri Ramawatar Shukla, Advocate, Resident of Malviya Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. V E R S U_S 1. Balramdas, aged about 13 years 2. Harish Kuniar aged about 8 years Both sons of Bishandas Bajaj, Minors, through - guardian ad- litum father Bishandas, son of Melumal Bajaj, residents of Tikarapara, Raipur. 3. Bishandas, aged about 55 years, son of Melumal Bajaj, Businessman, resident of Tikarapara, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 4. Ghanshyamdas, aged about 65 years, son of Shri Kanhaiyalal Agrawal, 5. Smt Shanti Devi, aged about 65 years, wife of Shri Ghanshyam Das Agrawal. Resppndents No.4 and 5 are residenttpf Qtr No. B-3, Ravi Nagar, Raipur^dahattisgarh) 6. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the District Collector, Raipur (CG) CRIMINAL APPEAL UNDER SECTION 34FOF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 •ffl Tw^"'3 ^^^^^^''^'^^1'^':'"'^'". !"l?1:^;t"4 ^'"EfS^lBiTCSIS® D^^^ltll^ UIM6KII §€SB t f»ii m B n! iBB TI'FRCT^RT^ ""•—"•••• ;<9::S~. ••'•• • ••U».«.^»'a •:.«|,»«;a.i Mli ^ SITiSTmaB'll*? asiTaii^OTWTW :-a!i23.-<te iii! BRira'RE^gfsiii^i 'Slm^S:|S$l •CwU ileaEileff^GouiiseI for fhe ap'geIU K". ' ^^ri Sudlur^Bajjaaveegi Hearil^mi'aflmissiiEa'i..^ T'liis. ;a®peatfitas^been.fi] Griiiuxtal, Prpc'etlure against^llj) uaSer SectK»il34Q^offhe^Cir.Rl SuitNo;3-A/:30Qfc..; ,,Y^' The :co;Bfeiitic>n:sif'leai-Eli t\vo feilseva.fBctSixHs!inari<edad fhe Beppnents s'beftire^ th!e relation?t6 ffiese aiBtiaSits,srej|( LeaBaed couasel for I Qt finqufay;i^a.SYaia<le: fixiia thear^ about Qie contents'of^hese certaiti agricultural^ .laad, •tl^i -.]3ers<^s^,are%'ajc)t\l)illie:^^e'sj|i| agricuU.ui-at la-ads affi ? siluf applfcation uiuiter Seetioiy Trial Court aactafbe'sanie wasl Inthe'^Efs.aiid.cire'aBife :;, raerit:ut:1:h.is^@ipiea^asd"th£| ;Se|nior .Advpcate wi(h Shri K.R.Nair, ^nt..: ^- :: :':~ :: -:••: • " . : ^P^setLawyerforfheState. 34|Q |«Ri^»i!^«t<i|*«;A'*f^s^l'[^^i>(' :;^f:fc3JK)«.<illS?T' "i''1',' lecE'uii.d.er SsGtiC!;B 3?fct. 6f ftie Codle of ^] order ef^iqectioii' of an agplication ;G. fited.Befirfe the trial Courfin Givil 't 3cl: coUitiseI •fi3r..fhe appeiUaiit ^is tjhat, AullexuTe A-4.and.A-5.were filed bv .Go'urt^giid when :au( apglicatipn ia, .anadej ifie appUcatiaa was Tejectecfci,,. ic ajipellant subinits (tiait wSeh .an jeBd..&1oin,^fhe Sarpaach o! fhe:village aPictEtvits^wfajcli is about cultiyatiofl of ;:-t(t<j^l1^-1 ;H:;fhe^Sar|3£iHGhs1:oltl:liheiiiy'tBAse S^ymT^~^ '-:''~: :T"- 71L.^i:'1 snts., ©Eytfiat viflage in. wliich 'Ule ^teiff;.^ 'jOn ;.tl3i& grouiid^ oaly,, & 0:f'ffi^X?r.P.C. was filectflaelore ttie1 'Fe]eCfed^ :, '•'. , - .^^.' ", ;;,.j,! stances effittis case, I do not find any amie: is. (iismassed at fhe inotjsjasStagp Sd/-, Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge