1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 190 OF 2009 Jayantilal Harilal Panchal & Anr. ....Petitioners Versus Jagdish Amritlal Karia & Anr. ....Respondents Mr. Soni i/b. Ram & Co. for the Applicants Jagdish Amritlal Karia, Respondent No.1 appearing in person. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATE : 16th JUNE, 2009. P.C. : Mr. Soni, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, after taking instructions from the Petitioner No.1 who is present in the Court, seeks leave to withdraw the Revision. Leave as prayed for, is granted. The Civil Revision Application is disposed of, as withdrawn. 2. At this stage, Mr. Soni, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, submits that Petitioner No.1 is the proprietor of Petitioner No.2 i.e. M/s. Metal Craft Engineers and carrying on business in the suit premises for more than 16 years. He further submits that the decree of eviction is passed, only on the ground of default in payment of rent and therefore, seeks longer time of three years to vacate the suit premises. In view of the above peculiar facts, the Respondent No.1 appearing in person, has no objection, if longer time to vacate the suit premises is given to the Petitioner No.1. 2 3. In view of the concession given by the Respondent No.1 in person, the Petitioner is granted time to vacate the suit premises till the end of September, 2012 subject to filing usual undertaking within the period of four weeks from today in the Trial Court. 4. If the undertaking is not filed within the stipulated period, the Respondent No.1 is at liberty to execute decree. sd/- (R. V. MORE, J.)