IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 20TH OCTOBER 2011 / 28TH ASWINA 1933 RP.No. 747 of 2011(I) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.20083/2011 Dated 31/08/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- SHAMMY THILAKAN, S/O THILAKAN PALAPPURAM, JNRA-3, OPP.S.N.WOMEN'S COLLEGE, KOLLAM-01 BY ADV. SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR SMT.A.SALINI LAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. S.SREEKUMAR, PROPRIETOR, MANI'S FAMILY MART, KOLLAM-6901001 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM 690001 3. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT PUBLIC WORKS (G) DEPARTMENT GOVT.ECRETRIAT, TRIVANDRUM 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD ROADS DIVISION, KOLLAM 691001 GP SRI. MOHAMMED SHAH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.P.747/11 APPENDIX ANNEXURES A1- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).20083/11 A2- COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT A3- COPY OF THE PRINT OUT OF THE PHOTOGRAPH A4- COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 13.8.10 A5- COPY OF THE PRINT OUT OF THE PHOTO SHOWING THE ALREADY CONSTRUCTED PORTION OF THE DRAINAGE ON THE EASTERN SIDE A6- COPY OF THE APPROVED PLAN ISSUED BY THE CORPORATION OF KOLLAM A7- COPY OF THE PRINT OUT OF THE PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING THE WATER FROM THE MALL IS DRAINING TO PUBLIC ROAD A8- COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD DATED 22.7.2010 (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... R.P.747/2011 in W.P.(C).20083/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 20th day of October, 2011 ORDER The writ petition was disposed of directing completion of the construction of drainage of the Karbala - Jawahar Junction Road. Review of the judgment is sought for on the basis that the respondent is now using the drainage for discharge from the Sewage Treatment Plant in his building. In my view, even if the said allegation is true, such an issue is totally alien to the scope of the writ petition or the judgment and therefore, that will not in any manner render the judgment erroneous warranting exercise of the power of review. Therefore, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out his remedies before other appropriate forum, the Review Petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs