IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15042 of 2011 Byas Choudhary, S/O Late Muni Choudhary, R/O Vill.- Konch, P.S.- Konch, Distt.- Gaya. . . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The District Magistrate, Gaya. 3. Sub-Divisional Officer, Tekari, Gaya. 4. Block Development Officer, Konch, Gaya. . . . . . Respondents. ----------- 2/ 30.09.2011 A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner, who is a P.D.S. dealer within Konch Block in the district of Gaya, prays for quashing Memo no.524 dated 20.07.2011, issued under the signature of Sub-Divisional Officer, Tekari, Gaya, whereby he has been directed to refund the values of 140.03 quintals of rice allotted under SGRY Scheme at A.P.L. rate of Rs.13.10 per kg. The petitioner disputes the quantity of rice that would remain undistributed with him. He submits that only 1046.13 quintals of rice remained with him. Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 would also govern the instant writ petition. 2 The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioner would either deposit 15% of the value of undistributed rice to the tune of 1046.13 quintals as claimed by him at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within six weeks. The representation of the petitioner would be disposed of within 10 weeks thereafter. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)