IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 9191 of 2005 Between: D.Dauran Khan s/o Late Raheem Khan, R/o H.No.19-2-573, Jamal Bee Ka Takia, Fateh Darwaja, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND The Deputy Director, Survey & Land Records, Hyderabad, Hyderabad District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent in not considering the petitioner representations dated 10-3-2005 and 28-3-2005, is illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional and against the principles of natural justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.SIVA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR REVENUE This Court at the admission stage made the following: THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.9191 OF 2005 ORDER : This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the alleged inaction on the part of the respondent in conducting survey and demarcation of the land situated in Sy.No.15 of Shaikpet Village & Mandal, Hyderabad admeasuring Ac.4.09 guntas as sought in the representations dated 10-03-2005 as well as 28-03-2005. The material on record shows that the application dated 10-03-2005 made by the petitioner was received in the office of the respondent on 20-03-2005. In the circumstances, the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondent states that the request of the petitioner will be considered in accordance with law. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 10-03-2005 and to take the necessary action in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits and in case there is any objection for survey and demarcation of the land in question as sought by the petitioner, it is open to the respondent to raise such objection, but the same shall be communicated to the petitioner. No costs. __________________ 25th April, 2005. ghn To 1 The Deputy Director, Survey & Land Records, Hyderabad, Hyderabad District. 2 Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (O.U.T.) 3 Two CD copies.