IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.22778 of 2008 Between: 1 K.R. Sree Ramulu S/o. K. Ramanna R/o. D.No.4/1532, K.L.D. Road, Anantapur. 2 V. Venkateswarlu S/o. V. Venkata Ramudu R/o. D.No.1/462, Rudrampeta, Anantapur. 3 B. Fakruddin S/o. B. Lalu Saheb R/o. D.No.8/13, Sundaraiah Colony, Kakkalapalli Post, Anantapur. 4 A. Sree Ramulu S/o. A. Narayanappa R/o. Janasakhi Nagar Near Bypass Road, Anantapur. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Commissioner of Social Welfare, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2 District Social Welfare Officer, Social Welfare Department, Government of A.P., Anantapur. 3 District Collector, Anantapur District, Anantapur. 4 Government college Hostel Committee, Anantapur, rep. by its Principal & Warden. 5 Government College Hostel Committee, Anantapur, rep. by its Deputy Warden. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction preferably a writ in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in orally terminating the petitioners from the service of the Government College Hostel, Anantapur with eﬀect from January 2008 and not disposing of the representation of the Petitioners dt. 06.06.2008 as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to dispose of the said representation and reinstate the petitioners into their service with all attendant benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.VISWANADHAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.22778 OF 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition so as to enable the petitioners to workout the appropriate remedies available under the law. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, leaving liberty to the petitioners to approach the Labour Court or any other appropriate forum and workout their remedies as available under the law. No order as to costs. _________​__________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 18th October, 2008. IBL