1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Second Bail Application No. 10659/2010 Arif Ansari Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 18.11.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Rajesh Goswami - for the petitioner Mr Peeyush Kumar, PP – for the State Mr Ajay Kumar Saxena – for complainant BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for offence under section 420, 406 and 120-B IPC the matter has been compromised between the parties. In view of aforesaid, petitioner may be granted bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Learned counsel for complainant has no objection to grant of bail. After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, bail application is accepted and it is 2 directed that accused-petitioner namely; Arif Ansari may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 156/2010 registered at Police Station – Moti Dungari, Jaipur for offence under Section/s 420, 406 read with section 120-B IPC provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma