IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 5356 of 2007 DATE OF DECISION: October 30, 2007 Achal Bansal and another …Petitioners Versus UCO Bank and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. K.D. Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. M.M. KUMAR, J. Learned counsel for the respondents states that the dues of the respondent bank have been recovered after auctioning the property belonging to the principal borrower and at this stage it is not necessary to resort to auction in respect of the property belonging to the petitioners. In light of the above mentioned, learned counsel for the petitioners do not wish to press the petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) October 30, 2007 JUDGE Pkapoor