IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14699 of 2010 RATISH MISHRA @ RITIK MISHRA Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 12.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that protest of petitioner’s wife to save the interest of her ward’s people, this case is lodged with frivolous allegation in which also offence under Section 379 of the I.P.C. is not found true by the Police and nature of the allegation under Section 353 of the I.P.C. is not justifying refusal of anticipatory bail. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Tajpur (Waini O.P.) P.S. Case No. 297 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Samastipur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)