IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.. APPELLATE JURISDICTION.. APPELLATE JURISDICTION.. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 8978 OF PETITION NO. 8978 OF PETITION NO. 8978 OF 2005 . 2005 . 2005 . Sitaram Govind Supekar ... Petitioner. V/s. Pune Mahanagar Palika Transport ... Respondent. Shri D.M.Gupte for the petitioner. Shri R.G. Ketkar for the respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 3.5.2006. : 3.5.2006. : 3.5.2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : ---- ---- ---- . Heard rival parties. Perused petition. 2. Having gone through the petition, the view taken by the Court below appears to be a reasonable and possible view. No perversity in the order could be demonstrated by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3. Shri Ketkar, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent brought to my notice a judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Transport Manager, Transport Manager, Transport Manager, Pune Pune Pune Municipal Corporation Transport Undertaking vs. Municipal Corporation Transport Undertaking vs. Municipal Corporation Transport Undertaking vs. Vasant Vasant Vasant Gopal Bhagvat 1999 (1) Mah.L.J. 520, Gopal Bhagvat 1999 (1) Mah.L.J. 520, Gopal Bhagvat 1999 (1) Mah.L.J. 520, which holds that employees of transport undertaking of Municipal Corporation and other employees of municipal corporation can be governed by different set of rules, nature of work not being identical. The view taken by the Court below is in consonance with the law laid down by the Apex Court. Petition is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)