IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2426 OF 2006 IN APPEAL (LDG.) NO.580 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.1354 OF 2004 ITDC Ltd. ....Appellant V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.Ramesh Ramamurthy for the Appellant. Mr.G.W. Mattos, A.G.P. for the Respondents. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED: 27TH JULY, 2006. P.C. :- . Mentioned, not on board. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and the learned counsel for the Respondents. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bona-fide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)