IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6054 of 2007 AZAJ AHMAD, son of Md. Safi, resident of village & Post- Desari, PS. Desari, District- Vaishali…. Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The District Magistrate, Vaishali, District- Vaishali. 3. The District Superintendent of Education, Vaishali, District- Vaishali. 4. The District Education Vaishali, District- Vaishali. 5. Block Development Officer, Bidupur, District- Vaishali. 6. Block Education Extension Officer, Bidupur District- Vaishali. 7. Harendra Sahni, son of not known, the Panchayat Sachiv (Panchayat Shewak) Gram Panchayat Raj Kathaulia, PS. Bidupur, District- Vaishali. 8. Sunita Devi, wife of Shivnath Paswan, Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj, Kathaulia, PS. Bidupur, District- Vaishali. 9. Md. Safi Alam, son of Md. Islam, resident of village +P.O. Rajasan (Rajaso), PS. Bidupur, District- Vaishali. 10. Musta Uzama, son of late Md. Masi Uzama, resident of village- Kathaulia, PS Chandur Nanhkar, PS- Bidupur, District- Vaishali. …. Respondents. ----------- 2. 27.10.2010 No one appears for the petitioner. Counsel for the State is present. In the opinion of this court the following relief of the petitioner; “1. That this writ application is being filed on behalf of the petitioner for issuance of a appropriate writ/writs, direction/directions, order/orders, directing and commanding to respondent no. 7 & 8 to appoint the petitioner in place of respondent no. 9 or 10, whatever is there, as a Panchayat Teacher as the petitioner is more deserving candidate to respondent no. 9 & 10 and the respondents authority for his personal gane ignored the candidature of the petitioner though the petitioner have a 61.22% marks and respondent no. 7 have 51 % marks and respondent no. have 60% 2 marks.” basically relating to anomaly in the selection and appointment on the post of panchayat shikshak has to be looked into and decided by a fact finding adjudicatory tribunal created by the State Government under 2006 rules, namely, District Teachers Appellate Authority. That being so, this writ application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move the said appellate authority which would decide the case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as also respondent nos. 9 and 10. With the aforementioned observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of. kanchan/- ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)