IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.20658 of 2002 Between: M/s. Sai Mitra Estates, Rep. by its Managing Partner K. Bhaskar Naidu, S/o. K. Ses -hagiri Rao, having its office at H.No. 14--76, Ram Nilayam, P & T Colony, Dilsukhanagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Rep. by its Commissioner, having its office at Municipal Complex, Tank Bund, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate Writ, order of Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent corporation in interfering with the construction activities and threatening to demolish the structure in premises bearing H. No. 12--13--364, situated at Tarnaka, Secunderabad as being illegal, arbitrary, ultraviers the provisions of the H. M. C. Act and violative of principles of natural justice and to grant such other relief or reliefs Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.RAMGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.GANTA RAMA RAO The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.20658 of 2002 ORDER: Petitioner seeks to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in interfering with the construction activities and threatening to demolish the structures in respect of the premises bearing H.No.12-13-364 situated at Tarnaka, Secunderabad, without issuing any notice and without pointing out any deviations as illegal and arbitrary. This court while admitting the writ petition on 11-10-2002, directed the respondent not to interfere with the construction activities as long as it is in conformity and in accordance with the sanction plan. I am of the opinion that under the guise of the interim order, the petitioner cannot make constructions contrary to the sanction plan. However, if there are any deviations, it is always open for the respondent to issue notice and take appropriate action in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition is dispose of in terms of the interim order, dated 11-10-2002. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 18-04-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VVS}