IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH JUNE 2011 / 18TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 10745 of 2011(P) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- SURENDRAN, S/O.VELU, AGED 49 YEARS, MALIYEKKAL HOUSE, NEDUVARANKODE, (VIA) CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 689121. 2. PRADEEP BHARATHAN, S/O.BHARATHAN, NEDUVINAL KIZHAKKETHIL, MAMBRA, NEDUVARANKODE P.O., CHENGANNUR, PIN - 689508. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) 10745/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE RECOMMENDATION DTD. 7.2.2011 GIVEN BY THE AGENCY FOR DEVELOPMENT OF AQUAACULTURE, KERALA (ADAK). P2:- COPY OF THE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO.B-12531/11 DTD. 23.3.2011 PASSED BY THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, CHENGANNUR. P3:- COPY OF THE RECOMMENDATION DTD. 22.2.2011 MADE BY THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, CHERIYANAD KRISHI BHAVAN. P4:- COPY OF THE REQUEST FOR POLICE PROTECTION MADE BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT ON 29.3.2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE tss R. BASANT & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ........................................... W.P.(C).NO.10745 OF 2011 ............................................. Dated this the 8th day of June, 2011. JUDGMENT Basant, J: Petitioner seeks police protection to undertake the activity which he has been permitted to undertake as per Ext.P2 order issued by the Sub Collector, Chengannur. It is his case that the 2nd respondent is raising illegal and untenable obstruction to the petitioner's attempt to carry out the permitted activity under Ext.P2. Second respondent has been served. There is no appearance for the 2nd respondent. Learned Government Pleader on behalf of the first respondent submits that the first respondent shall afford police protection to the petitioner as already directed by the interim order dated 8.4.2011. The same must be read as part of this judgment. 2. We note that on 8.4.2011 in the detailed interim order passed by this Court, the following interim direction was issued. “It is accordingly directed that the first respondent shall afford protection to the petitioner to undertake the activity strictly in accordance with Ext.P2 order against any obstruction that W.P.(C).NO.10745 OF 2011 : 2 : may be raised by the 2nd respondent.” 3. There is no appearance for the 2nd respondent. Learned Government Pleader has no objection and we are satisfied in these circumstances that the interim order dated 8.4.2011 extracted above can be made absolute. 4. In the result: a. This petition is allowed. b. Interim order dated 8.4.2011 extracted above is made absolute. Sd/= R. BASANT, JUDGE. Sd/= K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE. /true copy/ P.S. to Judge. cl