IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 4301 of 2008 Between: V. Ravi Kumar, s/o. V. Basanna, R/o. 6th Ward, Near Basannagudi, Kanekal, Ananthapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Managing Director, APSRTC, Bus Bhavan, RTX 'X' Roads, Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District. 3 The Divisional Manager, APSRTC, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District. 4 The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Rayadurg, Ananthapur District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:None appeared Counsel for the Respondents: SMT.W.V.S.RAJESWARI The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession of the allotted open space in Kanekal Bus Station, where a fast food Centre was opened by the Petitioner as per the Terms and conditions of the Agreement dt. 23.08.2006 and allow him to do business as per the terms and conditions of the Agreement without subjecting to further conditions which were not in the Original Order of Allotment vide Proc.No.02/122(35)/2006-RM-A, dt. 28.4.2006 of the 2nd respondent and further direct that the petitioner may be continued for the period of 6 years as agreed in the allotment order dt. 28.4.2006 while declaring that putting further conditions to the agreement and allotment itself is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the original orders of allotment while quashing the impugned proceedings 02/122(35)/2006 RM’A’ dt. 07.01.2008 of the 2nd Respondent.” On 03.03.2008, no one appeared for the petitioner. Hence, the case is adjourned to today. Even today, when the case was called, no one represented the petitioner. It is, therefore, reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition in default, WPMP.No.5605 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed. C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 4th MARCH, 2008 kvni