mnm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 388 OF 1996 Prabha Sampatlal Mehta ...Plaintiff Vs. Mahendra Tarachand Mehta & Ors. ...Defendants Mr. M.L. Kukreja i/b. Lilani Shah & Co., for Plaintiff Ms. Pranjali Bhandari i/b. N.M.Shah for Defendant No.29 CORAM : SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : 6TH JUNE, 2011 P.C. : 1. The Plaintiff is stated to have expired. The heirs and legal representatives have not been brought on record for want of instructions. Even on the last date of hearing the Plaintiff’s Advocate informed the Court this aspect. The Plaintiff’s Advocate has written further letter to one of the sons of the original Plaintiff asking for instructions. No instructions are received. 2. The suit has abated and is disposed off as such. 3. Copy of the letter of the Plaintiff’s Advocate along with the courier slip is taken on record. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.)