IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.7043-M of 2010 Date of Decision:21.1.2011 Mangal Singh and others .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. G.S. Thind, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Dhaliwal, Addl. A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for issuance of directions to respondent to execute warrant of execution of sentence concurrently. It is, now, well settled proposition of law as well as the law already laid down by the Full Bench in the case of Jang Singh v. State of Punjab 2008(1) RCR (Criminal) 323, that the jurisdiction to direct the sentences to run concurrently lies before the trial Court or in appeal or revision and not in a petition under Section 482 and Section 427 of the Code is not maintainable. Accordingly, the said relief cannot be granted to the petitioner in a petition filed under Section 482 and 427 of the Code. Dismissed as not maintainable. 21.1.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE