IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 9401 of 2008 Decided on: 26.4.2011 Dr. Bimal Kumar Pal ……….Petitioner. Versus H.P. University ….Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Romesh Verma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. Romesh Verma, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has died during the pendency of this petition. He further submits that he has informed the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner, but they have not come forward to be impleaded as party in the present petition. 2. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed for non- prosecution, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. April 26, 2011. (Rajiv Sharma) (hl) Judge 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.