IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.19811 of 2011 Date of Decision : October 20, 2011. Nishant .....Petitioner versus The State Board of Technical Education, Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Ms.Kamlesh Khatri, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is a student of final year Diploma in Engineering (Polytechnic) in the Hindu Institute of Technical Education, Sonepat. He appeared in the 5th semester examination held by the State Board of Technical Education, Haryana, but was declared 'fail' in two papers. The result remained the same even after re-checking. The petitioner thereafter, obtained photostat copies of the answer sheets and has now approached this Court claiming that some of his correct answers have been 'wrongly' assessed by the examiners and/or he has been given less marks. The petitioner, on this premise, seeks a direction to the Board to declare him pass after adding marks of the correct answers attempted by him and also to grant him the grace marks. CWP No.19811 of 2011 [2] Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner at some length, I am of the considered view that no direction granting the desired relief to the petitioner can be issued. In sum and substance, the relief sought by the petitioner amounts to re-valuation of the answer sheets, even when no such provision in the Regulations framed by the respondent-Board has been pointed out. Dismissed. October 20, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE