li'il? n- 'j lil!; .:: ;:; f ,ljn:i.;i;i liH., Tumans HIGMCOURTOFCHNATTlSGARHATiBil.ASPUR Sjngle^Bench : Hon'bJeShriDtIiDRaGSahebDeshniukh.J. S.A.N0.12/20Q8 ADpeilants Plaintiffe 1. Respondents Defendants Smt Radha Devi W/o 1-ate Shri Radheshyam ^rawal, Aged aboyt 63 ..years.;:'.'('','-::::'1;'',^^ 2. Abhisek Agrawal, j S/6 Late Shri Rad}:ses}iyamAgrawal,Agedabout 29 ';years..^'.^'^.f.\,^,:.,-:/.:. Both are residentofVillageDatrengi,^ Tehsil Palari, Distri<A Raipur <C^5.) Versus ^' f: / .1' '"•-. 1":" -:''.' 1. Sub Divisionai OfRcer, Balodabazar, DistrictRaipur(C.Gj^ 2. Stete of Chhaftisgarh Through Coltector Raipur, J District Raipur :''1,(C.G.)-,-.',,-'.1.;-;^ SecondABi3^lunderS8Ction100oytheC6de Present : . •• . .. ::. .',: lv.': ;/ . :• ShriPrakas}iTiwari,counsei1brtheappe!iants, ^fCivil Proc^dure ORN-ORDER ) .'./ :','1. :! ,. •'^; (Passedoiri 14th Jahuary, 2008) Keardon I.A.No.1/2t30$forcondonafionof€leiay. The appellantshave preferredthisappealagainstthejudgmentarid decreedated 27-10-2005 passedbythe 2nd AciditionaiDistrictJudge, Baiodabazar/QistrictRaipurinCivilAppealNo.4-A^004^ It is notdisputed thatthe appellants werejrepresented bycoynse! before the lower appeJlate Court; It is also not disputed that certffied copy of the impugned judgment and decreedated 27-10-2005 wrais applied by the appeliants on14-11 -2CK)5 and certified copy of the impugned judgment and decree was deliveredtothemon 22-11-2005. Despitethis.thereisno sufficient ground shown for condoning inordingte delay of 703 days in prefemngthisappeal.No90odgroundisshownforcQndonati(>n(rfc3e!ay. Accordingly,the application I,A.No.1/200Sforcondonation ofdeiay ,ls.;dlsmissed..-;^..: /-••^1^ Consequently, the second apDeai also stands di^ byJJmJtation. Sd/- DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge