IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.150 OF 2006 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION ST. NO.23728 OF 2006 Nandkumar Tukaram Kokat .. Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents ... Mr. V.S. Kapse for the petitioner. Mr. R.S. Khadapkar, A.G.P. for respondents no.1 & 2. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 6th November 2006 DATED : 6th November 2006 DATED : 6th November 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.P. for respondents no.1 and 2. Respondent no.3 is a formal party. 2. For the reasons stated in paragraphs no.3 and 4 of the application, delay is condoned and the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J)