RSA No. 2546 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision:16.05.2011 RSA No. 2546 of 2010 (O&M) Bachan Singh and others ...Appellants Vs. Mohinder Singh and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI Present: Mr. Gurdial Singh Jaswal, Advocate for the appellants. Ms. Gurnam Kaur, Advocate for the respondents. **** M.M.S.BEDI, J, (ORAL). Suit of plaintiffs-respondents for permanent injunction has been decreed by the courts below. Counsel for the appellants has vehemently contended that the defendant-appellant has got no objection in case the suit of the plaintiffs- respondents stands decreed for the property ABCD, but in regard of said decree the plaintiffs-respondents are seeking to take possession of khasra No. 1207. He has relied upon the annexure P-7 and P-8, the jugments of the trial court and appellate court in which it has been held that the present defendants-appellants are owner in possession of khasra no. 1207. Counsel for the plaintiffs-respondents has submitted that the plaintiff does not claim khasra No. 1207 on which the defendant-appellant is admittedly in possession. I have heared learned counsel for the parties and gone through the judgments passed by the courts below. Finding of the fact has been arrived RSA No. 2546 of 2010 (O&M) -2- at by the courts that the property in dispute i.e. ABCD shown in the heading of the plaint owned by the plaintiffs-respondents is different from the property owned and possessed by defendants-appellants i.e. khasra No. 1207. In view of the said circumstances, I do not find any ground to interfere in the judgments and decrees passed by the courts below. Clarifying, that the plaintiff-respondent is owner in possession of property shown with letter ABCD in site plan Ex. P1, whereas the defendant- appellant is owner in possession of khasra No. 1207, both the parties having possessed title regarding their respective lands and suit for injunction of both the parties having been decreed by the civil courts, no ground is made out for interference. Disposed of with the above said clarification. (M.M.S. BEDI ) JUDGE May 16, 2011 divyanshi