THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 3597 of 2010 Dated: 27.09.2010 Between: V.G.Venkata Narayana, Ananthapur District. … Petitioner And R.Sreenivasa Prasad, Ananthapur District. … Respondent THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 3597 of 2010 O R D E R : The revision petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.175 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ananthapur. The suit is filed for permanent injunction restraining the defendant/respondent herein from interfering with the suit schedule property, which is stated to be a vacant site. The petitioner/plaintiff also sought temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC by filing I.A.No.306 of 2010. Though initially temporary injunction was granted, subsequently, by order dated 26.04.2010 the same was vacated. Pending the said application, the petitioner/plaintiff filed I.A.No.370 of 2010 seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to make local inspection of the petition schedule property to note down the physical features and to take photographs to measure the land. The said application was also dismissed by the Court below on the same day i.e. 26.04.2010. Aggrieved by the said order dated 26.04.2010 in I.A.No.370 of 2010, the present revision petition is filed. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the material available on record, I do not find any justifiable reason to interfere with the order under revision. As rightly observed by the Court below, it is for the petitioner/plaintiff to substantiate his plea with regard to the possession in respect of the suit schedule property by adducing independent evidence. The law is well settled that the appointment of Commissioner is impermissible for collecting evidence in favour of one of the parties to the suit. No case could be made out by the petitioner to show that the material/information sought to be obtained by the Advocate Commissioner is of peculiar nature, which can be had only by local inspection. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition, which is devoid of merit, is hereby dismissed. No costs. ​ ______________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 27.09.2010 KLP