IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.3290 OF 1992. SUIT NO.3290 OF 1992. SUIT NO.3290 OF 1992. Chaganlal Khimji & Co. Ltd ..Plaintiff versus M/s. Kantilal & Co. And Others ..Defendants Mr.P.K.Shroff for the Plaintiff Mr.A.I.Kayser with Mr.K.S.Pachood for the defendant Nos.1, 3 to 6 Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 18th April, 2007 Dated : 18th April, 2007 Dated : 18th April, 2007 P.C. 1. Both the parties present. They admit to have compromised the suit in terms of consent terms marked "X" for identification. Both the learned advocates have also signed the consent terms as well as the minutes of order marked "X-1" for identification. 2. Decree be drawn in terms of Consent Terms "X" and Minutes of Order "X-1" 3. Undertaking given by the defendants in Clause 2, 3 and 8 of the Consent Terms have been accepted. -2- 4. Issue necessary Court fee refund certificate in the name of the plaintiff as per rules. 5. Decree be drawn expeditiously. 6. Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (S.R.Sathe, J.) (S.R.Sathe, J.) (S.R.Sathe, J.)