IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42566 of 2011 Md. Taslim & Anr. Versus Union Of India Through Custom ------ 2/ 22.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Earlier petitioners were granted privilege of anticipatory bail by this court vide order dated 13.7.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 3333/2011 till submission of the charge sheet. It would appear from perusal of the impugned order that after submission of the charge sheet, petitioners surrendered before the court below but they were taken into custody and their prayer for bail was rejected by the learned court below without mentioning any new fact which is supposed to have come after passing of the order dated 13.7.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 3333/2011. It appears from the impugned order as well as submissions of the parties that after passing of the aforesaid order dated 13.7.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 3333/2011, no new material has come against the petitioners. Accordingly, petitioners, Md Taslim and Md Muslim, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Samastipur in Samastipur (M) P.S. Case no. 349/2010 arising out of NDPS 6 of 2011/ 7 of 2011. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)