IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11067 of 2009 AJAY KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 27.10.2009 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the State. Petitioner has challenged the order of termination contained in memo No. 2388 dated 18.12.2001 and also the report of Five Men Committee constituted in the light of the order passed in LPA No. 946 of 2003. As per the Inquiry Report, petitioner’s appointment has been put in the category of forged appointment. Similar matter has been considered by this Court in CWJC No.6575 of 2009 and analogous cases. All such termination orders and the report submitted by the Five Men Committee have been quashed directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioners with all consequential benefits. Petitioner’s case is also being disposed of in terms of order passed in CWJC No. 6575 of 2009 and analogous cases - 2 - decided on 6.10.2009. The impugned termination order and the Inquiry Report relating to the petitioner are quashed. The respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner in his service with all consequential benefits. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar