WP(C) 3364/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. A. Bhattacharya, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. J.M.A. Choudhury, learned CGSC. The petitioner who is presently posted at Jagiroad is aggrieved by Annexure-3 tr ansfer order dated 28.04.2010 by which he has been transferred to Durgapur. Mr. Bhattacharya, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not adverse to his transfer order, but he needs sometime to carry out the said o rder to look after his daughter. According to the petitioner, his daughter is a student of Class-XII of Kendriya Vidayalaya, HPCL, Jagiroad and she will appear in the final examination to be held in March/February, 2011. Placing reliance on the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Director of School Education, Mad ras and others vs. O. Karuppa Thevan and another reported in 1994 Supp (2) SCC 6 66, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that interest of students should be kept in mind by the authorities while transferring an employee. Learned CGSC on the other hand, submits that the petitioner having been complete d his tenure of posting at Jagiroad, there is no wrong in transferring him to Du rgapur. He submits that the petitioner being a member of the armed force, is bou nd to carry out the transfer order. Having regard to the limited scope of interference in such matter exercising th e writ jurisdiction and as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, thi s writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to take on record the A nnexure -4 representation dated 30.04.2010 and to dispose of the same by a speak ing order. Let the said representation be disposed of as expeditiously as possib le preferably within 30.06.2010. Till then, status quo as on today shall be main tained. It is made clear that if the representation has already been disposed of , the authority may ignore this order.