IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM MONDAY, THE 2ND MARCH 2009 / 11TH PHALGUNA 1930 RP.No. 217 of 2009() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN RCR.325/2008 Dated 17/02/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): REVISION PETITIONERS: ------------------------------------------- 1. SARASWATHY AMMAL, W/O.LATE MANMADHAN CHETTIYAR, AGED 50 YEARS, RAMMAYAR COMPOUND, MULLAKKAL, ALAPPUZHA. 2. SREEKALA, AGED 27 YEARS, D/O.SARASWATHY AMMAL, OF DO, DO. 3. SREEKUMAR, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.LATE MANMADHAN CHETTIAR, OF DO- DO-. BY ADV. SRI.VISHNU.R RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS: --------------------------- 1. R.RAJAN, S/O.LATE RAMAN NAIR, AGED 46 YEARS, RAVEENDRA SADANAM, MULLACKAL, ALAPPUZHA. 2. B.SYAMALA, D/O.LATE RAMAN NAIR, AGED 52 YEARS, OF D0, DO. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ R.P.NO.217/2009 IN R.C.R.No.325 OF 2008 ------------------------ Dated this the 2nd day of March, 2009 ORDER Pius C.Kuriakose, J. There is no opposition to this review petition from the side of the learned counsel for the landlord, since it is submitted by the learned counsel for the review petitioners - tenants that the review petitioners are withdrawing from the Rent Control Petition itself. The Review Petition accordingly stands allowed. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE dpk