IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5824 of 2009 YADU PANDIT, SON OF LATE SARYUG PANDIT, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SADATPER, P.O. KALHUA PAIGAMBERPUR, POLICE STATION KANTI, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR (BIHAR) VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MECHANICAL DIVISION, KOSI PROJECT,DARBHANGA. 3. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A&E), BIHAR, BIRCHAND PATEL PATH, R-BLOCK, PATNA. 4. THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER, G.P.F., DARBHANGA AT LAHERIASARAI. 5. THE TREASURY OFFICER, MUZAFFARPUR. ----------- 2. 8.5.2009 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add the District Provident Fund Officer, Darbhanga as respondent no.6. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel no.22, who appears on behalf of the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the retiral dues on account of pension, gratuity and commutation of pension have been sanctioned by the Accountant General, as contained in Annexures 1, 2 and 3 to the writ application, but the petitioner, who retired on 30th of September, 2008, has not received the aforesaid payments. It is further submitted that apart from the above, the dues on account of provident fund and difference of salary have not even been sanctioned. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that the petitioner has filed the writ application without bringing the above facts to the notice of the Department; otherwise the Department could have taken notice of it. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the 2 petitioner submits that for redressal of his aforesaid grievances as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a representation before the Executive Engineer, Mechanical Division, Kosi Project, Darbhanga (respondent no.2). Considering the submissions of the petitioner, he is permitted to file a representation before respondent no.2 within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order. In case such a representation is filed, the respondent no.2 shall look into the matter with regard to the payment of the sanctioned amounts, as per Annexures 1, 2 and 3, and shall also consider with regard to the dues as claimed by the petitioner on account of provident fund and the difference of salary as also the benefit of A.C.P and dispose it of by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months on receipt of such representation. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)