pdp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 636 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 26 OF 1996 ------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s Memoranda of Coram, orders appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders ------------------------------------------------------ Mr. S.M. Sabrad for applicant. Mr. A.R. Patil, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 3. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & D.G. KARNIK, JJ. 09/02/2009. P.C.: . Heard Mr. Sabrad the learned counsel for the applicant who claims to be the LR of the original appellant - Shri Gajanan Shridhar Pundale. The original appellant died and, therefore, this application to implead the applicant as the appellant in First Appeal No. 26 of 1996 which was filed by Gajanan. . As per the office note the application is beyond time by 473 days and in support of the plea for condonation of delay it has been stated that the applicant had informed regarding the demise of his father to the Advocate on record but no steps were taken by the said Advocate and he subsequently stopped practicing. . We are satisfied that the delay caused deserves to be condoned subject to levying costs. . Hence the delay condoned and the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (c) subject to remittance of an amount of Rs.500/- to the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority within a period of two weeks from today by the applicant by way of costs. Appeal memo be amended within one week. (D.G. Karnik,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)