-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2509 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.2509 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.2509 OF 2006 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. None for the Applicant Mr.S.R.Shinde, A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : DECEMBER 6,2006. : DECEMBER 6,2006. : DECEMBER 6,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The Advocate appointed for the Applicant is not present. Heard learned A.P.P. for State. He has placed on record an Affidavit of Shri Dattatray Ganpat Gawde, Jailor Group I, Thane Central Prison, Thane. The Affidavit records that a case is pending against the Applicant before the Special M.C.O.C. Court in Mumbai. The Affidavit records that there was another case pending in the court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 48th Court, Andheri, Mumbai and in the said case, the Applicant has been discharged by order dated 14th November 2006. A copy of the report submitted by the Superintendent of Thane Central Prison -2- is annexed to the Affidavit. The said report discloses that from 15th October 2001 till 16th November 2006, the Applicant was taken to MCOC Court on 203 dates fixed in the case and only on 21 dates the Applicant could not be produced on account of non-availability of proper police escort. 2. Statements made in the Affidavit are accepted. In view of the said Statements, it is not necessary to pass any further direction in the Application. Application is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE