In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-28927 of 2009 (O&M) Lalitu ..... Petitioner vs State of Punjab ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Harinder Kumar Aurora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as in the application for anticipatory bail filed before the Court below prayer could not be made for grant of bail under Section 307 IPC as well as the offence under the aforesaid section was added later on. In the application only Sections 323, 324, 506, 326, 148, 149 IPC were mentioned as FIR initially was registered under those sections. It was on account of that fact that the anticipatory bail was not prayed for under Section 307 IPC that the bail application was dismissed. He seeks permission to withdraw the present petition to move a fresh application before the Court below with a prayer to grant bail for the offences under all the sections which have been added in the FIR. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 22.10.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge