IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.18660 of 2001 Between: D.Uday Bhanu Prakash, S/o. Vedanayakam, R/o. H.No.18-7-10, Kedareswarapet, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Educational Officer, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 2 The Deputy Educational Officer-I, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3 The Additional Project Coordinator, Janashala Programme, Mylavaram, Krishana District. 4 P.Madhusudhana Rao, S/o. Sri Ramulu, R/o. Tadankivariveedhi, Satyanarayana Puram, Vijayawada. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in direc ting the 3rd Respondent to conduct re-enquiry (third enquiry) against the petitioner for the Secretary and Correspondent ship of Sri Lakshmi Educational Association, Kedareswarapet, Vijayawada, as arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction and for extraneous consideration and to issue a consequential direction the Respondents not to interfere with the affairs of the Petitioner towards the Secretary and Correspondent ship of Sri Lakshmi Educational Association Kedareswarapet, Vijayawada. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.18660 of 2001 ORDER: This writ petition has been filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in directing the 3rd respondent to re-enquiry against the petitioner for the Secretary and Correspondent ship of Sri Lakshmi Educational Association, Kedareswarapet, Vijayawada, as illegal and arbitrary. A counter has been filed stating that the petitioner himself agreed to change the correspondent ship to Smt.M.Vijaya Sree. The said proposal was submitted to the D.S.E., A.P., Hyderabad vide Lr.Rc.No.18/C7/04, dated 21- 04-2004, and the same was approved by the D.S.E., A.P., Hyderabad, vide proceedings Rc.No.459/B1-2/2004, dated 28-10-2004, as per Sub- Section II of Section 24 of A.P.Education Act I of 1982 read with G.O.Ms.No.74, Education, dated 27-02-1989 and G.O.Ms.No.147, Education, dated 21-06-1990, and the same was communicated to the management on 10-11-2004, and that now Smt.M.Vijaya Sree is still continuing as correspondent of the school. In view of the aforesaid averments made in the counter that the correspondent ship was already changed, I am of the opinion that no orders are required to be passed in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 25-07-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{ANURADHA}