IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1160 of 2010 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 3. The Deputy Director (Election) Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 4. The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna 5. The District Magistrate, Patna 6. The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Patna 7. The Block Development Officer, Khushrupur, Patna 8. The Chief Development Project Officer, Fatuha Versus 1. Satyanand Thakur S/O Late Jai Ram Thakur R/O Vill.- Jagmangal Bigha, P.S. Khushrupur, Distt.- Patna ----------- 04. 01.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This appeal under clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the High Court of Judicature at Patna raises a grievance with respect to the order dated 5.5.2010, passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in CWJC No.17498/2009 (Satyanand Thakur Vs. The State of Bihar and Ors.), whereby the order of the State Government removing the writ petitioner from the post of Mukhiya has been set aside. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that, after disposal of the writ petition, election of Mukhiya of the Panchayat in question has already taken place which renders this appeal 2 infructuous. In that view of the matter, this appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. V.K.Pandey (S.K.Katriar, J.) (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)