Crl.M. No. M- 11113 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M- 11113 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 28.4.2011 ... Manjit Singh ................Petitioner vs. State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner Sh. Amandeep Singh Rai, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Sh. Mandeep Bedi, Senior Advocate with Sh. Ashish Ahuja, Advocate for the complainant. ... K.C. Puri, J. Petitioner – Manjit Singh has applied for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 9 dated 6.2.2011 under Sections 341, 323, 148, 149, 506, 427, 325 IPC (later on offences under Sections 336, 382 IPC and 25/54/59 Arms Act, added and later on again offence under Section 308 IPC added), registered at Police station Dorangala, District Gurdaspur. As per allegation of the prosecution, petitioner gave iron rod blow on the left knee of the complainant-Amrik Singh which injury Crl.M. No. M- 11113 of 2011 -2- was declared grievous. Amrik Singh also suffered other grievous injures which are on the left side of the lower leg and on the wrist joint. Initially the case was registered under Sections 341, 323, 148, 149, 506, 427, 325 IPC. On 22.2.2011, offence under Section 308 IPC was added. The doctor has opined that possibility of these injuries collectively could be dangerous to life cannot be ruled out. The opinion is not categorical. The petitioner has joined the investigation and weapon of offence is stated to have been recovered from him. So, in these circumstances, the application for grant of bail stands accepted and the in the event of arrest the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail to the satisfaction of SHO/Investigating Officer, on the following conditions : 1) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation, as and when required, by the police; 2) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and 3) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court. Learned State counsel has submitted that vide order dated 30.3.2011 passed in Crl.M.No. M-5594 of 2011, this Court ordered the investigation of the case through an IPS Officer of integrity. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Avtar Singh, has Crl.M. No. M- 11113 of 2011 -3- further submitted that in whole of the District, no IPS Officer has been posted. So, in these circumstances, the said order stands modified and it is ordered that S.P. (D) Gurdaspur, shall conduct the investigation. The petition stands disposed of. ( K.C. Puri ) 28.4.2011 Judge chugh