IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 471 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 443 OF 2004 DY. COLLECTOR BICHOLIM ... Applicant Versus VILLAGE PANCHAYAT SURLA THROUGH SARPANCH AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mrs. Rakhi Chodankar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S. N. Joshi, Advocate for the respondent/ original petitioner. S/Shri A. N. S. Nadkarni with H.D.Naik, Advocates for the respondent No.14. Sudesh Usgaonkar, Advocate for the respondent No.13. Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate for the respondent No.9. Mr. M. S. Sonak, Advocate for the respondent No.17. Coram:- S.A. BOBDE & R. C. CHAVAN, JJ. Date:- 1st July, 2008 P.C. The learned Advocate General on behalf of the State prays for certain directions in regard to the clause 6(d)of the minutes of order in terms of which this Court has passed an order on 8th August, 2007. We heard the parties and we, accordingly, direct that the Court Commissioner shall make payment only to such occupants/owners for their respective areas where there is no dispute amongst the owners in regard to the right to receive the compensation. Where there is a dispute, the Court Commissioner shall be at liberty to withhold the payment till the occupants/owners either arrive at a consensus and get appropriate directions from competent Court of Law that the claimant is entitled to receive the amount. Order accordingly. This application is disposed of. S.A. BOBDE, J. R. C. CHAVAN, J. SMA