IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.1091 of 2005 Between: 1 T.G. Mallikarjuna Setty, S/o. Late TG Lakshmaiah Setty, R/o. Adoni, Kurnool District. 2 T.G. M. Nagaraj, S/o. T.G. Mallikarjuna Setty, R/o. Adoni, Kurnool District. Now Lodged at Central Prison Kadapa. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Central Secretariat Buildings, New Delhi. 2 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Buildigns, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 3 Bysani Venkata Reddappa Setty, S/o. B. Arunachalamaiah Setty, R/o. Chowdepally Village, Punganur Mandal, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to pass appropriate orders by issuing appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the discharge of enforceable debt amount of the cheque towards the liability of the 2nd petitioner herein and the consequently declare the settlement entered by the 1st petitioner, on behalf of the 2nd petitioner, and 3rd respondent has been acted upon under Sec 147 of NI Act being an offence u/s 138 of N.I. Act is compoundable and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.Y.RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.1091 of 2005 ORDER: When the matter has been taken up for hearing on 12-06-2008, none appeared for the petitioners and as such, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption “for dismissal”. Today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing, neither learned counsel for the petitioners is present nor is there any representation on their behalf. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, the interim order granted on 31-01-2005 stands vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 19-06-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SPJS}