1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4708 OF 2010 Govindrao Hanmantrao Chavan ..Petitioner V/s Ramrao Vasram Chavan and others. ..Respondents ......... Mr.N.S. Kadam, Advocate for petitioner. Mr.D.R. Korde, A.G.P. for respondent nos.4 and 5. ........ (CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) DATE : 17th June, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that though required number of Gram Sabhas were not held and the respondent nos.1 and 2 were disqualified to continue as Sarpanch and Upsarpanch of village panchayat, yet the learned Additional Collector, Nanded dismissed their application for discontinuation of said respondents, chiefly on the basis of certain forged and fabricated documents of the meetings/Gram Sabhas, which were prepared by the Secretary. The learned Additional Collector noticed that after election of Sarpanch on 19.01.2008, the first Gram Sabha was held on 26.01.2008 and thereafter, monthly Gram Sabhas were held as shown in the chart indicated in paragraph no.1 of the 2 impugned order. The question whether, the Secretary/Gram Sevak prepared the false record of such meetings is a question of fact. The petitioner was previously Sarpanch and lost post. The petitioner did not adduce prima facie evidence to indicate that the documents were forged, and therefore, the Collector accepted the record about holding of Gram Sabhas. The petitioner alleged that not a single Gram Sabha was held but the Collector negatived such contention on the basis of material available before him. The petition involves several disputed questions of facts, which can not be gone into in exercise of writ jurisdiction. The Petition is dismissed. (V.R.KINGAONKAR) JUDGE gas/wp4708.10