( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.466 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.466 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.466 OF 2007 IN IN IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.500 OF 2002 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.500 OF 2002 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.500 OF 2002 Ram Avtar Ram Achal Chauhah .. Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr.Niranjan Mundargi for the applicant. Mr.H.J.Dedhia, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 6th June, 2008. DATED : 6th June, 2008. DATED : 6th June, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Mr.Niranjan Mundargi for the applicant. Mr.Dedhia, learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This application is filed for a peculiar prayer that the applicant wants this Court to permit compounding of offence under Section 420 of I.P.C. and for that he wants to have the process issued against the respondents, who one does not know whether are willing to compound the matter. In the normal course, the applicant and the respondents ought to have appeared before this Court and should have filed ( 2 ) an application jointly for compounding. The present application is not maintainable and is far away from the normal practice. Hence it is required to be dismissed. Application is, therefore, dismissed. 3. Revision No.500 of 2002 to come up for final hearing in the normal course. (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.)