IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1515 of 2007 CHANDAN PRASAD @ GOLU SAH Versus ANJANA DEVI @ PUTTI DEVI ----------- 2 29/8/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court amount of Rs. 900/- per month by way of maintenance cannot be said to be so shocking so as to be interfered by this Court in exercise of power under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with section 19 of the Family Court Act. That apart, when wife in her application as contained in Annexure-1 had made specifically assorted that the income of the petitioner was at least Rs. 10,000/- per month, nothing was disclosed by the husband petitioner in this regard on the question of income which was within only his knowledge. In that view of the matter, this Court would not find any error in the impugned order. Accordingly, this application is hereby dismissed with a direction to the petitioner to pay arrears and current amount within a period of one month from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order, failing which court below will be at liberty to realize the said amount by taking coercive steps. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. ) Abhay Kumar