IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12892 of 2010 Between: Rangaraju Lalitha … Petitioner And The Director General & Inspector General of Police, Hyderabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. Jayasree for Sri C. Damodar Reddy Counsel for respondents 1-4: AGP for Home The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12892 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.3 and 4 in frequently calling the petitioner and her husband to the police station and threatening them to pay money to respondent No.5, pending the civil suits, as illegal and arbitrary. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4. According to the petitioner, respondent No.5 filed O.S.No.27 of 2010 in the Court of VII Additional District Judge, Warangal, for specific performance of contract dated 24.04.2009 and obtained an interim injunction against the petitioner in respect of house bearing No.11-24-12, Deshaipet Road, Warangal. She also pleaded that respondent No.5 has filed a private complaint against her and her son in the Court of the I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Warangal and that on reference made by the Court, respondent No.4 registered Crime No.73 of 2010 on 25.04.2010 for the offences under Sections 405, 415, 420 and 506 read with 34 IPC. The grievance of the petitioner is that on the influence of respondent No.5, respondent Nos.3 and 4 have been harassing her and her husband. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that neither of respondent Nos.3 and 4 have been interfering in the civil disputes, that respondent No.4 has filed a charge sheet in Crime No.73 of 2010 and that except holding investigation and filing charge sheet in the said case, the police have neither interfered in the past nor they intend to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.5 in future. The above submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader are placed on record and the writ petition is accordingly disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.16242 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 26.07.2010. ES