Law) 68/6 BEFORE TEE MADHYA PRAD]?SH Am NISTRATIVE TREBUNAL JABALPUR 0 ;A . N of 19% N w~P§m QIE/oy : Arum Kumar $ahu, $ /o Skhr‘i Nirbhaya Ram 3am, aged ahom: 28 year's , R/o Village am 130$: - Chaurel, Eigir‘ict - Burg. wPLy mgr V ers us RES EDNDE NTS 1 ‘. S‘ca'te af Madhya Pradesh thr oug‘n S ecl‘ eta‘ry , S'cho 01 Education wepartmen‘t, Vallabh Bhgaian , Bho pal (MJ? .) Joint iDir$tor, Fublic Instructia n5 , Raipur Eivis ion RaipJl". (M. P.) Reveme Commiss ione‘c‘ ,' Raiyur mivmion, Raipur‘ (M.P.) wgm OF THE APPLm A‘rIxLN 3 , @ C3¢\9q\ 93 W HIGH CGURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETmQN {SI N031 3IZOO§ §ingle Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish $ Agnihotrig Present: - None for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State. i: ‘ oRAL QRDER \ {Passed on this 15‘“ day oi September, 2009) The matter is called for hearing twice. On both occasions, noné appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may noi be interested in the matter. (2) in View of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Registry is directed to send a eopy of this order to the petitioner forthwith. ” Sdl‘ . .K Sau'sh K. Agmhotn‘r Judge ,ieeea i i i PETIT!ONE§ 'Arun Kumar Sahu Versus RgSPONDENT$ State of Madhya Pradesh and