1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Misc. Civil Application (review) No. 236 of 2009 in Writ Petition No. 2312 of 2007 (D) Mrs. Vasudha W/o Arun Kulkarni ...VERSUS.. The Union of India through Estate Officer, Defence office, Mumbai and others =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==- Mr. R.S.Parsodkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.K.Mishra, Asstt. Solicitor General for Respondent no.1 Mr. S.B.Ahirkar, A.G.P. for respondent nos.2 and 3. C ORAM : D.B.BHOSALE ; and PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATED : 13th July, 2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this application seeking review of the order dated 01/10/2008, passed in Writ Petition No.2312 of 2007 and submits that the petitioner would like to approach the concerned authority by way of representation for appropriate relief. The Misc. Civil Application is disposed of as not pressed. It is open to the petitioner to approach the concerned authority by way of representation and if any such representation is made by the petitioner, the same may be considered by that authority in accordance with law. 2 While granting the liberty, we shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case or issued any direction to the concerned authority to pass any particular order on the representation. It is made clear that if the petitioner makes representation as aforementioned within a period of two weeks from today, the concerned authority shall consider the same within a period of six weeks therefrom. JUDGE JUDGE Diwale