CRM-M No. 23014 of 2011 **** Sunita Jindal v. State of Punjab and others Present: Mr. B.S.Thind, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Gill, DAG, Punjab. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 346 dated 15.08.2010 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC registered at Police Station Division No.5, Civil Lines, Ludhiana, Distt. Ludhiana. On 01.08.2011 the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel has argued that the allegations, if any, are against the husband of the petitioner and no action has been attributed to the petitioner in the complaint filed by the bank.” Learned DAG, on instructions from ASI Harbans, has accepted the fact that the husband of the petitioner who is the main accused, was arrested and bailed out. In this view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner appear before the investigating officer on 24.09.2011 between 10.00 a.m. and 4.00 p.m. The investigating officer shall release her on bail to his satisfaction, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE September 16, 2011 sunita