&\;la’0 2/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGA H AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (S) No. 4&9 I200? PETITIONERS : 1. Kamaleshwar Prasad Sahu S/o Late Shri Jeevarakhan Lal Sahu Age about 43 years, AssistantTeacher, Village + Post - Kolar, Block — Abhanpur, Distt. — Raipur (C.G.) 2. Tikam Lal Sinha S/o Shri Narayan Ram Sinha Age about 48 years, AssistantTeacher, Govt. Primary School, Biroda, Block - Abhanpur, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS State Government of Chhattisgarh Through :- Secretary, Tribal & Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer Raipur (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer Abhanpur, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDIER ARTICLE 22(6F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (s) No. 409 of 2007 SB: Han‘ble Mr. Jusfice Saiish K. Agnihoiri, J Mr. Ajay Shrivasfavu, Advocate for the pefifioners. Mr. '5ushii Dubey, Govemmen‘t Advocafe for 'l'he respondeMs/Sfafe. O R D E R (Passed on 23'“ day of January, 2007) The foHowing order of 'fhe Cour? is passed by Safish K. Agniho‘l'ri, J. 1. Learned caunsel appearing for fhe pzfifioners as we" as learned Government Advocu‘re qupenring for The respondenfs/S'mfe join'Hy submif 1ho+ The focfs of fhz presen'r case is similar f0 'rhu’f of in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006 (Sushi! Tiwori d: ofhers Vs. 5mm Govt of Chhufrisgarh & ofhers), which was allowed vide order da‘red 7’” November, 2006. They further submi'r fhai’ +he question of iaw involved is also 1he same. 2. In view of 1he above shred submissions made by learned counsel for The parties, flie writ pe1'i1'ion is allowed in Terms of the order daied 7*“ November, 2006 passed by fhis Cour‘l' in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006. No order as fo cos'rs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri . Judge Thakur Pe+i+ioners : Kamaleshwur Prosud Sahu and mofher Versus Respnndenfs : Smfe Govemmenf of Chhuftisgnrh and ofhers