COCP No. 1163 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. COCP No. 1163 of 2010 Date of decision:- 7.12.2010 Gian Chand. ....Petitioner Vs. Shri Dev Raj and another. ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present:- Mr. I.P.S. Kohli, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Cheema, Advocate, for respondent No.1. HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) ****** A writ petition filed by the petitioner, challenging his eviction from the Panchayat land measuring 1 Kanal 10 Marlas, was allowed by Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 22.08.2006. The petitioner was to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- with the Gram Panchayat as price of the said land. The petitioner deposited the said amount of Rs.10,000/-, but the possession was not restored, which led to filing of of contempt petition before this Court. During the pendency of the contempt petition, the petitioner has made a statement (Annexure R-1) on 17.08.2008, wherein he has admitted that he has got the possession of 1 Kanal 10 Marlas of COCP No. 1163 of 2010 2 land. Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently argued that though at one stage, possession of 1 Kanal 10 Marlas of land was handed over to the petitioner, but now possession of 5 Marlas of land has been taken by the Gram Panchayat. The order passed by the Division Bench of this Court on 22.08.2006 has been complied with, when the possession of land measuring 1 Kanal 10 Marlas was handed over. Said fact is admitted by the petitioner himself in his statement Annexure R-1. Any subsequent dispossession from any part of the disputed land cannot be said any violation of the earlier order passed by this Court. In view of the said fact, I do not find any further orders are called for in the present contempt petition. Disposed of accordingly. (HEMANT GUPTA) 7.12.2010 JUDGE aj