IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5277 OF 2004 Samulla Abdulla Rozzag Beg ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Ms. Anjali Patil Contractor, for the Applicant. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 20th December 2004 P.C.: . Heard Counsel for the parties. I find no reason to depart from the conclusion reached by the Court below in rejecting the bail application filed at the instance of the present Applicant. There is sufficient material to indicate complicity of the Applicant in the commission of the offence in question. Besides, I find substance in the argument of the learned A.P.P., which submission is made on the basis of instructions and the relevant record is also produced before me, that there are in all 18 cases registered against the present Applicant, out of which in two cases, he has been acquitted so far. Besides, on two occasions, M.P.I.D.Act proceedings have been initiated against the present Applicant. Even for this reason, no indulgence is warranted. Hence, rejected. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)