1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.506 OF 2009 Pradhumna Shrikrishna Malbhari ..Petitioner Versus Laxmi Dattaram Devulkar & Ors. ..Respondents None for the Petitioner. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER 2009. P.C. : 1. None for the petitioner even at the second call. 2. Dismissal of the Writ Petition in default, invariably, results in restoration application which is normally granted. This creates strain on the Registry. In this view of the matter, we ourselves went through the Writ Petition. 3. The petitioner is challenging the order of the learned Single Judge of this Court passed in Revision Application No.11 of 2007 in Second Appeal No.869 of 2005 which arose out of the civil litigation. Needless to mention that the order of the High Court cannot be challenged before the High Court itself. In this view of the matter, the Writ Petition is without any substance. The same is, therefore, dismissed for the reasons recorded. (A.A. Sayed, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)