IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31215 of 2010 ONKAR MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 19.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant, Mahendra Kumar Sinha. Informant’s son was shot dead by one of the motorcycle riders. They are named as Hemant Singh and Vijy Singh. Vijay Singh has been shown with a revolver. There are differences in between the petitioner and the deceased as mentioned in the F.I.R. Further, his presence at the place of occurrence is also mentioned in the F.I.R., thereafter, it has appeared that the deceased was surrounded by him (petitioner) and others which has been doubted on the ground that informant is the eye witness of the incident. His grand-son examined in para-12 has also signed the fardbeyan in which Vijay Singh is shown with revolver with Hemant Singh. Later due to differences, further story has been developed and specifically it is said that due to differences, he is being involved in the incident but in any case, he is not assailant of the deceased. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with G.R. No. 964 of 2010 arising out of Kotwali P.S. Case No. 237 of 2010, above named petitioner shall be released on 2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Munger subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)