(^f-^S^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0, ^-:Y$-g / 2006 PETITIONERS ^s^- :..--^.5< ./-" k^...- -*•*' ^\v~ ^ *''.• ^^•'" 1) :Susanta Kumar Mahakud^ S/o Late Duryodhan Mahakud Aged about 33 years, Working as UDC Regional Office, E.S.I.C, Raipur. R/o- MIG-II, 125, Sector-2 ^ Pandit Deendayal Upadhaya Nagar Dist- Raipur (C.G) LVG^A ^^- fc- ^' cfi^ ^" ^" ^^- 2) Pravat Kumar Sahoo S/o Trinath Sahoo Aged about 32 years Working as UDC Regional Office, E.S.I.C, Raipur. , R/o 407/54, Dongonia Krishna Attachaki, Raipur (C.G) Versus RE.SPONDENTS ^ls^ !./'^^v^ 11( ^^w ;':s ^\cc-^ Union oflndia MinistryofLabour Sram Shakti Sadan, Raffi Marg Mew Delhi Director General Head Quarter office Employee State Insurance Corporation CIG Marg New Delhi .^B^E^K:?;- 3., Regional Direetor •/' Regional Office, ESI Corporation 18, South Avenue, Choubey Colony Raipur(C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA POR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT ORDER OF DIRECTION TO DO JUSTICE IN THli MATTER. HIGH COURT QECHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HQN'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNmOTRI. J. WMT PETITION N0.4758 OF 2006 Petitioner Susanto Kumar Mahakud aad anotiier versus Respondents Union oflndia and others Present : Mr. H.S.Ahluwalia, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Rajnish Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate on behalf ofMr. Shailendra Dubey, counsel for respondentNo.l. None appears for other respondents. ORDER ifll (Passed on 4m ofSeptember, 2006) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners, at Ihis stage, confines his prayer to the grant of liberty for moving the respondents - aulfaorities for amendment in revised seniority-list dated 14.7-2006 as on 31-12-2005 (Annexure P-5), to which leamed counsel appearing for respondentNo.l has no objection. 2. Accordingly, tihe petitioners are granted liberty to make a representatioii, if so advised, to the respondents aulhorities. On such representation being filed, the respondente - autiiorities are directed to consider tfie same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation from tiie petitioners, in accordance with law, on its own merit. 3. For the reasons above-stated, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- _ . SaUs^K.A&n^m Judge