BER ^ c J IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. (S) No. $> / PETITIONER Smt. Lily Pricilla Toppo W/o Shri lliyas Toppo, Aged about 52 years, Occupation - Upper Division Teacher, Pt. Javahar Lal Nehru Hir. Sec. School New Khursipar Bhilai Distt. Durg (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, School ', LA12^-<S."-r -".'~~i'." _•-----'—^' ...—r":'?""??;^-^ Education Department, D.K.S. "^S'lff^3^^-'"' ^———•_--•— "_•-_-' ^gentedby^1-,^,^....... Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) ^l. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA sn^r^i 1?;n3;si^i s^W W5?T ^9 ^•q •^ITSTRPI, •g^THS, fartltiy 3V^?f ^S^K ...to.t^..-.%/ il HIHW{9iWf> Iq^ET' sn^i ^raiw'aft'a SBjHon'bieShriManindraMohatb 10-01-2011 59. It is further submitted ttiat thisl order dated 06-02-2009 passed in Wji for the petitioner further draws 4 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal tt have been issued for consideratiort «bl'4l<'l<il-l W^vS'?^S tp>]<<l<. ^7 sifiair CT^I Shrivastava. J, he prtitioner. Shri Vipin Tiwari, counsel for Shri Ajit Singh, F^nel Lawyerjfor the State/re^aondente. Heard. Learned counsel appearing fi^r the petitioner submite that the petitioner is entiUed to benefit of two advancje incremenis on account of she having passed B.Ed examination before |»er appointment at her own cosi. it is submitted that the issue involved integra and the same has been finai) in the ease of Asha Saxenavs. St^t n the present petition is no longer res y decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court teofM.P. &0rs.. (ifi}MPJR fSC) Court has also taken a similar view in its .P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Leamed counsel ttention of this Court to order dated lo.124 of 2009, wherein relying upon the judgmeni of the Supreme Court in fl^e case of Asha Saxena (supra) and Ihe order passed by this Court in anofher Writ Appeal No.87/2009, directions of fte case for grant of two adwnce incremente as per circular dated 21fire-1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of the fact^ pteaded in the petitton. Learned counsei for the respohdents submits that case of the pefitioner would aiso be considered on the san^e tines. in view of the statement made' above, this petition is finatly disposed off wift a direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide ttie claim [W r~ 2-0 » XI-HC-22 75[ ^ll.l||<r|^, ®fl|y'IS,(«<C11'M'J,< 3ff^?r ira^; b^^)^o^)/^ •%TO%--"""""""-"""--"^ i 111MI Shlich f^ST' OT^iI^; h'u'h sn^r ^HP^^TT^T Deepti sn^i ^aiwHfla ^ of the petitioner for grant of two a 21-09-i974 issued by the State of facts pieaded in the petition within a ajdvance increments as per circuiar dirted [Madhya Pradesh, after vertficaUon of the pertod of eight weeks fromtoday. SA/- ManindraMohanShrivastava ^W\f\411 ^l4^f ^ T£lril <f^l^$1< ^? aipair 3D^[ Itri-lr-i