THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 3792 of 2009 Oral order: The petitioners, who are parents-in-law of respondent No.4 have filed this writ petition complaining the inaction of respondent No.1 in taking action against respondent Nos. 2 to 4 on the complaint dated 04.02.2009 as illegal and arbitrary, and consequently to declare documents Nos. 324, 325, 326 of 2009, dated 31.01.2009, got forcibly executed by respondent No.3 in favour of respondent No.4 as null and void. The petitioners state that they were blessed with three daughters and one son. That they performed the marriage of their daughters, who are living with their in-laws peacefully. That they performed the marriage of their son with respondent No.4, who is a Home Guard, about 12 years back. That his son lead marital life with respondent No.4 at Karimnagar, Hyderabad and Mancherial. That all of a sudden, his son disappeared and his whereabouts are not known and they are suspecting that respondent No.4 is responsible for the disappearance of their son. Be that as it may, the petitioners state that they own land in an extent of Acs. 6.13 guntas, and that respondent No.4 after the disappearance of her husband, namely their son, did not live with them. That respondent No.4 is presently working as Home Guard in Manakondur Police Station, that with a view to dispossess them of the agricultural land, respondent Nos. 2 and 3 at the instance of respondent No.4, are harassing since 28.11.2008, and on 31.01.2009, respondent Nos. 2 to 4, have taken them forcibly to the Office of the Sub Registrar and got executed certain documents, and later on when they enquired with the Sub Registrar, they came to know that they were gift deeds, gifting the land owned by them in favour of minor children of their son, represented by their natural mother, namely respondent No.4. The petitioners state that they made representation dated 04.02.2009 to respondent No.1 requesting him to take action against respondent Nos. 2 to 4 for their illegal actions of getting forcibly executed documents, and it is their grievance that respondent No.1 has not taken any action thereon. Hence, the petitioners filed the present writ petition praying for the relief, as stated above. On 26.02.2009, this Court at the request of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, to get instructions, directed the matter to be listed after one week. Thereafter, respondent No.3 filed counter. This Court after perusing the counter, directed respondent No.3 to appear before the Court on 26.03.2009 along with the relevant record to substantiate the averments made in the counter affidavit. Again on 26.03.2009, considering the nature of allegations, directed respondent No.1 to conduct a detailed enquiry about the alleged harassment meted out to the petitioners by respondent No.3 by bringing them to the police station and beating them mercilessly, and submit a report to this Court by the next date of hearing so as to take further action in the matter. Respondent No.1 having got the enquiry conducted by the Sub Divisional Police Officer, submitted his report stating that there are disputes between the petitioners and respondent No.4, who is the daughter-in-law of the petitioners. Based on the petitioner filed by respondent No.4, the petitioners and the village Sarpanch were called to the Police Station, Manakondur, where they settled the matter amicably. As a result of the settlement, the petitioners executed gift deed in favour of respondent No.4 and her two sons on 31.01.2009 in respect of Acs. 3.18 gts. of land vide registered gift deed document Nos. 324, 325 and 326 of 2009, that he has verified the statements with the Sub Registration. However, the petitioners subsequently aggrieved by their actions, lodged complaint before respondent No.1 making false and baseless allegations of harassment by respondent Nos. 2 and 3 at the instance of respondent No.4. He further reported that upon considering the report of the Sub Divisional Police Officer, he has issued strict instructions to respondent No.3 and warned her not to interfere in civil disputes. In view of the above averments made by respondent No.1 in his report, and considering the instructions issued by him to respondent No.3 not to interfere in civil disputes, no orders need be passed in the writ petition. However, at this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners may be permitted to avail the remedies available to them in law against the harassment meted out to them from the respondents. The petitioners are always at liberty to avail the remedies available to them in law against the harassment, if any, meted out to them by the respondents. Accordingly, with the observations as above, the writ petition is closed. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 18th June, 2009. KSR