@ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Criminal Revision No. 44612011 ‘ APPLICANT Ranjeet Satpute Slo Late shri Chandrabhan Satpute, aged about 31 years. Rio 'Jatiya Talab, Behind Vedu Garage, Pannanagar, Jarhabhata. Bilaspur. [Tahsil & District Bilaspur (CG) w ESPONDENT Smt. Shraddha Satpute @ Shadeka Ali wlo Ranjeet Satpute, aged abouit 26 years, Rio Samata Colony, near Amar Gas Godown. Magarpara. Police Station Civil Lines, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (CG) Versus CRIMINAL REVISION UIS 19 (4) OF THE FAMILY COURT$ ACT 1984 RIW SECTION 397 & 401 THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Appearance : Shri R.R. $orii, Advocate for the applicant. ; ORDER (11 os 2011) H SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. - Heard on admission. Applicant- Ranjeet Samuie has filed this revision against the order dated 5.4.2011. passed in Misc. Criminal Case No. 19812009 by the Family Court Bilaspur. By the impugned order, an amount of Rs.2000/— per month has been granted as interim maintenance to the respondent Le. wife of the applicant. Shri Soni. learned counsel for the applicant submits that the application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was not bonafide as various material facts were suppressed by the respondent He also submits that an amount of Rs 600l- pm has been awarded as alimony to the respondent In the divorce petition tiled by her l have gone through the contents of the impugned order and have also perused the records tiled along with the revision petition. /*\ r R a @ CRR 446/2011 The learned Family Court has taken into consideration the amount of Rs.600/ p.m., which has been awarded to the tespondent in the matrimonial matter. The Family Court has also considered the other aspects and after assigning the reasonsrit has formed an opinion to grant interim maintenance of Rs2000l- per month to the applicant. The relationship of husband and wife has not been disputed by the applicant. After going through the entire facts and circumstances of the case, l do not find any infirmity in the impugned order passed by the Family Court, by which, an interim maintenance of Rs.20001- pm. has been granted in favour of the respondent. The revision filed by the applicant. therefore. is liable to be dismissed and it is hereby dismissed summarily. f ‘3 Sunil Kumar Sinha l Judge N Sd/—