IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22409 of 2009 GOPAL NAT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 05.08.2009 Heard. The sordid fact leading to the filing of the present petition and thus, forcing the petitioner to harassment is that the incharge court of F.T.C. II, refused releasing the petitioner on bail in S.T. no. 21 of 2009 ( Buxar (M) P.S. Case no. 1/1992 in spite of a direction from this court that the petitioner shall be released on bail by the court below on furnishing bail bond to its satisfaction if the trial was not concluded within a further period of six months. The rejection order appears a rank example of disobedience of the order of this court. Let Registrar General of this court be directed to request the District and Sessions Judge, Buxar to look to the order dated 18.5.2009 and the records of his own administrative office and to find out as to who was the officer who signed order dated 18.5.2009 passed in S.T. No. 21 of 2009. After having ascertained the name of the officer, the District and Sessions Judge, Buxar shall make over a copy of this order to that officer for submitting an explanation to this court as to why he be not proceeded with for disobedience of this court’s order which was an order granting bail whereafter the matter shall be placed before me on the administrative side in my chambers. The District Judge shall himself report as to when the order dated 14.11.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 41846 of 2008 was received by him and when was it sent to S.D.J.M., Buxar. - 2 - As regards prayer for bail, let petitioner Gopal Nat be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5000/(five thousand) with one surety of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Incharge F.T.C. II, Buxar in S.T. No. 21 of 2009 (Buxar (M) P.S. Case no. 1 of 1992). Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)