IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1696 of 2009 Date of Decision: March 26, 2009 Vijay Kumar and another. … Petitioners Versus Moti and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present : Mr. Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioners. S.D. Anand, J. The grievance of the petitioners is that in spite of the conclusion of the ex-parte evidence few months ago, an inordinately long adjournment was given by the learned Presiding Officer. The further grievance is that even when an appropriate plea for pre-ponement was filed, it did not find favour with the learned Presiding Officer. The learned counsel states that all that he requests is for the issuance of a direction to the learned Trial Court for early disposal of the ex-parte matter aforementioned because the defendants therein are cognizant of the pendency of C.R. No. 1696 of 2009 the trial but had refrained from entering appearance and are proceeding with the impugned construction. In the peculiar circumstances of the case, it is deemed just and appropriate to withdraw the proceedings from the Court of the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gurgaon, and transfer the trial to the Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gurgaon. The learned transferee Court shall hear arguments on 30.03.2009 and dispose of the suit in accordance with law. Disposed of accordingly. Dasti on payment of usual charges. March 26, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2