IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Arb. Case No. 26 of 2011 Decided on: 8.7.2011 M G Mehta Constructions Pvt. Ltd. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Mr. J.S. Bhogal, Senior Advocate with Mr. T.S. Bhogal, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Vikas Rathore, learned Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General submit that the respondents are ready and willing to appoint the Superintending Engineer (Arbitration) as an Arbitrator. Consequently, necessary notification to this effect be issued within three weeks from today. However, the interim order dated 28.4.2011 shall continue till the application preferred by the petitioner is taken up for hearing by the Arbitrator. 2. In view of the directions/observations made hereinabove, the present arbitration case stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge July 8, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No