WPPIL 82/2009 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, ACJ. Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J. Sri Navneet Kaushik, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order of the writ court dated 4th January, 2011, the appeal was decided by the Commissioner on 10.02.2011 under Section 27(2) of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. In view of the aforesaid, the grievance of the petitioner has been set at rest. The writ petition (PIL) filed is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. (U.C. Dhyani, J.) (Tarun Agarwala, ACJ.) 17-10-2011 17-10-2011 SP