IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.13754 of 1998 Between: 1 B.laxminarayana, S/o Narsimhulu, R/o Armoor, Nizamabad Dist. 2 D.Sailaja, W/o Natayana, R/o Nizamabad. 3 K.Vasantha Kumari. W/o P.Gnana Kumar, R/o Nizamabad. 4 S.Srinivas, S/o Shanthaiah, R/o Dichpally, Nizamabad Dist. 5 G.venkata Rammana, S/o narayana, R/o Armoor, Nizamabad Dist. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Govt. of AP, Rep by its Secretary, Education Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 State Commissioner & Regional Joint Director, School Education, Warangal. 3 The Dist. Collector & Chairman, Dist. Selection Committee, Nizamabad. 4 The Director of School Education, Hyderabad. 5 The Commissioner for D.S.C. & Dist Educational Officer, Nizamabad. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction and more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in framing the question paper for SGBT Teachers from out of the syllabus is illegal, arbitrary, null and void and in detrimental to the rights of the petitioners; and consequently direct the respondents to award bonus marks proportionately to the questions given from out of the syllabus or to compute the answer papers deleting those questions. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.J.SIDDAIAH (Not present) Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in framing the question paper for SGBT Teacher posts written examination held on 19.04.1998 from out of the syllabus, as illegal and arbitrary, and consequently to direct the respondents to award bonus marks proportionately to the questions given from out of the syllabus or to compute the answer papers deleting those questions. When the matter is taken up today for hearing, none appears for the petitioners. Learned Government Pleader for School Education submits that by lapse of time the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. _______________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 05.07.2005 Nsr ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Secretary, Education Dept., Govt. of AP, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The State Commissioner & Regional Joint Director, School Education, Warangal. 3 The Dist. Collector & Chairman, Dist. Selection Committee, Nizamabad. 4 The Director of School Education, Hyderabad. 5 The Commissioner for D.S.C. & Dist Educational Officer, Nizamabad. 6 Two CCs to GP for School Education, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad(OUT) 7 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VVS}