Mc IN THE HIGH COURT OF 'SGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.NO?^%E^^ fSssfs Bench APPLICANTS. Suresh Kumar & others. VERSUS .^ RESPONDENTS. Parmeshwar Dyal & others APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF F.A. No.'70/05 s^7^ ^^ l^cc. ^^/10 ^^>• '^ ^/ ^ APPBLLANT (Defendant No. 1&2) RjBSPONDENTS (Plaintiff). Defendant No. 3 Defendant No.4 1. Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Sagarmal Agrawal aged about 40 years, Occupation Businessnian, R/o Word No. 4 Nagar panchayat Sarangarh, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh(C.G.) 2. Minor Dilip Kumar S/o Shri Suresh Kumar Agrawal aged about 13 years, Through Guardian father Suresh Kuniar Agrawal S/o Shri Sagarmal Agrawal, R/o Ward No. 4, Nagar panchayat Sarangarh, Talisil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Permeshwar Dyal S/o Late Shri Roopram Tiwari, aged about 73 years, Occupation Retired C.S.E.B. Employee, Resident of Ward No. 7, Nagar Panchayat, Sarangarh, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 2. Janak Ram Sahu, S/o Shri Jagat Sahu, aged about 42 years, Occupation Documents Writer, (Sarangarh CivU 85 Tahsil Court) Resident of Village Rarapagula, Thana Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3. State of M.P. Now C.G.,- Through : Collector, Raigarh (C.G.)". ^^ 55^0/e HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS^rARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE MR. T.P. SHARMA & HON'BLE MR. R. L. JHANWAR. JJ. MCC (P.R.l No. 2026/2005 APPLICANTS Suresh Kumar Ssothers. Versus RESPONDENTS Parmeshwar Dyal & otliers. APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF F.A. No. 70/OS. Present:- Shri R.S. Patel, Advocate for the appUcants. ORAL-JUDGBMENT (Passedon 08/07/2010) The followins iudsanent of fhe Court was passed bv T.P. Sharma. J:- Heard on I.A, No. 2 appUcation for amendiuient ia the cause title. On due consideration I,A. No. 2 is aUowed, Let necessary aoiendment be carried out today itsetf. Also heard on restoration petition. Vide order dated 8/7/05 P,A. No, 70/2005 was dismissed forwatit of prosecution. On due consideration, we are satisfied fhat applicaiits has been able to explahi fhe cause for non-appearaace on behalf of fhe applican.ts when fhe case is called out for hearing. ConsequenUy, restoration petition is allowed. Order dated 8/7/05 passed ia F.A. No. 70/2005 is hercby set-aside. F.A. No. 70/2005 is restored m its origiaal number, No order as to costs, Sd/- T.P. Shanna Judge Sd/- R.L. Jhanwar Judge ^/