IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33623 of 2011 1.Ganesh Burnwal 2. Rohit Burnwal Both are sons of late Shashi Bhushan Burnwal, resident of village-Hussainabad, P.S.-Devipur, Dist.-Deoghar (Jharkhand) Versus The State of Bihar ----------- 2. 30.9.2011. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with a case in which cognizance for the offence punishable under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act has been taken. It is stated that initially first information report being Chakai P.S. Case No.58 of 2009 dated 22.5.2009 was registered against the accused persons for the alleged offence. The said case was investigated by the police and the police submitted final report on conclusion of investigation on 6.7.2009 holding the prosecution case to be false. Thereafter, the learned Magistrate accepted the final report and proceeded on the basis of complaint which was filed in the nature of protest. Pursuant to the enquiry under section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure cognizance was taken in the complaint case and thus the petitioners apprehend their arrest. It is submitted that the petitioners are brother-in-laws (Bhaisurs) of the victim. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case let petitioners above named in the event of their arrest or 2 surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/communication of the order be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Jamui in connection with Complaint Case No.379C of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Md.S. ( Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)