FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WRIT PETITION NO. 5553 OF 2011 YASHWANT KESHAV BHIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA AND ANR ... Advocate for Petitioner(s) : Shri Kutti Prassana N. AGP for Respondent(s): Smt. Shinde V.A. ... CORAM : D B BHOSALE & S B DESHMUKH, JJ. Dated: August 02, 2011 ... 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. In this petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to respondent 2 to consider and decide his application dated 15.4.2010. The petitioner claims to be a tribal. It is contention of the petitioner that he has been dispossessed of the agricultural land situated at Ukhalwadi, Taluka Shirpur, District Dhule and presently some non-tribal is in possession of the said land. 3. In view of the prayers made in the writ petition, we refrain from going into the merits of the case and we are satisfied that the following order shall meet the ends of justice. (A) Respondent 2 shall consider the petitioner's application dated 15.4.2010 (Exhibit "A" to the petition) as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order. (B) It is needless to mention that respondent 2 shall grant hearing to all concerned including the person, if any, in possession of the said land. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS (2) WRIT PETITION NO. 5553 OF 2011 4. With these observations, writ petition is disposed of. 5. While disposing of the writ petition, we shall not be understood to have examined the merits of the case. All contentions of the parties are kept open. ( S B DESHMUKH, J. ) ( D B BHOSALE, J. ) akl