IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc. No.77568-M of 2006 Date of Decision:- 16.03.2007 Karamvir ....Petitioner(s) through Mr.Raj Mohan Singh, Advocate vs. State of Haryana & others ....Respondent(s) through Mr.R.D.Sharma, DAG, Haryana. *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. In this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks certain directions to the official respondents to carry out the investigation in relation to the alleged murder of his brother (Mahabir) in accordance with the version stated to have been given by him in the complaint (Annexure P- 1). Notice of motion was issued and in response thereto the official respondents have filed their reply wherein it is stated that after investigation, a report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. has already been presented before the Court concerned. Since the petitioner is seeking a direction for proper investigation into the case and such kind of relief falls exclusively within the domain of the learned trial Court under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C., this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court Crl.Misc. No.77568-M of 2006 -2- concerned and make out a case for further investigation into the matter. Needless to say that if any such application is moved by the petitioner, the learned trial court shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law as early as possible and preferably within one month. March 16, 2007 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE