IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8072 of 2009 Sunita Devi, wife of Ramchandra Yadav, Resident of village- Sirsia, Gram Panchayat Kamargama, P.S.Singheshwar, District- Madhepura Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Director, Social Welfare, I.C.D.S. Directorate, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The District Magistrate, Madhepura, District Madhepura 4. The District Welfare Officer, Madhepura, District Madhepura 5. The Child Development Project Officer, Singheshwar, District Madhepura 6. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Kamargama, P.S. Singheshwar, District Madhepura ----------- 02/ 16.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the notice issued under the signature of the Child Development Project Officer, Singheshwar, bearing Memo No. 131 dated 1.7.2009, Annexure- 6 to this application, whereunder he has fixed 17.7.2009 as the date for holding Aam Sabha of Kamargama Gram Panchayat for appointment on the post of Anganwari Sewika for Sirsia Harijan Tola Centre. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that earlier the panel for such appointment was prepared in which petitioner was placed at serial no. 1, but one Meera Devi was recommended for selection on the ground that petitioner has been appointed as Shiksha Mitra. Such representation was wholly incorrect and highlighting such fact, petitioner moved the District Magistrate, Madhepura, whereafter the District Magistrate, Madhepura has passed order, bearing Memo No. 157 2 dated 6.2.2008, Annexure-3 to this application reinstating the petitioner as Anganwari Sewika for the aforesaid Centre. Notwithstanding the said order, the Child Development Project Officer, Singheshwar has fixed 17.7.2009 for holding Aam Sabha for making fresh selection. Such Aam Sabha, according to the counsel for the petitioner, is contrary to the direction of the District Magistrate, Madhepura contained in order dated 6.2.2008, Annexure-3 to this application. 4. Let the petitioner represent before the District Magistrate, Madhepura for enforcing his own order dated 6.2.2008, Annexure-3, which should be considered in accordance with law within one month from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order and any selection made in the meanwhile for the aforesaid centre in the light of the notice dated 1.7.2009, Annexure-6 shall be subject to the result of the representation filed in the light of this order. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)