/, /,M / a? 96% 3‘ BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G..) WRIT PETITION N0. H Qé /2002 PETITIONER ALL INDIA TRADE UNION OE FOOD CORPORATION EMPLOYEES AND WORKERS {Regd. No. warm/613) Through : armanand Sharma, Regional President ~ Chhattisgarh, AITUFCE & W. Regional Office, Raipur (C.G.) Address : 340, FCI Colonys Changora Bhatha, P.0. Sunder Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 492013. A. K. JHA, v- aged about 42 yeawr:§‘a» S/o Shri V. K. Jha, Junior Engineer (Civil) Food Corporation of India, KAPA, Ream/(C.G.) w» S. N. TRIPATHI, aged about 39 years, S/o Shri K. N. Tripathi, Junior Engineer (Elect) ‘._\ g; Imw\ FoodCorporation of India, KAPA, Raipur (C.G.) : twlaes ” TUFCE 89w Regional Commmee MmADJ£X 1" \ A.AA. ...n wA/% 'I A N RESPONDENT ‘ ' coi‘lyaf' UH, i W ~ Q m: 39 y w'W 'r.1\1e il‘ VERSUS EOOD CORPORATION of INDIA Through : Managing Director, Food Corporation of India, 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi. ZONAL MANAGER 1WEST! Food Corporation of India,’ Mistry Bhawan, D.W. Road, Church Gate, Mumbai (M.S.) SENIOR GENERAL MANAGE R, Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, Junction - Ravigram, Telibandha, Raipur (C‘G.). ETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WRIT E HIGH COURT OF CHHAT'HSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 1496 01‘2002 PETITIONERS :AI] India Trade Union of Food Comoratoin Employees & Workers & others. @ VERS US RESPONDENTS : Food Corporation oflndia India & Others. WRIT PETH‘ION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hongbie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. and perspective, at the earliest. . a. f Sdl- ‘ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Present: Shri V.G.Tamaska1; Advocate for the petitioners. Norm for the respondents. {)RDILR {ORAL} (Passed on 015‘ day of April, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that the petitioners do not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage. However, a direction may be issued to the respondent authorities to consider the pending representation dated 20.04.2001(Annexure P/6) as expeditiousiy as possible. 2. It is ordered accordingly. Consequentiy, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners, as aforestated, in accordance