CRLMB6865/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Cr. Misc. 2nd Bail Application No.6865/2010 Ram Kishore Vs. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor Date of Order ::: 29.07.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Anurag Sharma, Counsel for petitioner Shri Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available to me during the arguments of the case. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that liberty was granted to the petitioner to apply second time for bail before the court of Sessions after the statement of injured Panchi Devi, who sustained fracture of right frontal parietal bone, was recorded. On perusal of her statement, I find that the statement in no way improves the case of the petitioner. However, it appears that she had named certain persons as eye witnesses, for whom the learned counsel for petitioner argued that said witnesses had made exaggeration because in originally registered first information report by her husband it is alleged that he himself, Atarey, Mishrya and Patle arrived at the scene of occurrence upon hearing hue and cry. Learned Public Prosecutor at this stage submitted that Chinhe and Sharbati were two eye witnesses in the case-diary and therefore he CRLMB6865/2010 // 2 // would advise the local Public Prosecutor to examine them as witnesses as early as possible. With that direction, the bail application is dismissed. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//