fb ^ ]^- ^-Tr-y/ 003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR^C.G.) WRIT PETITION N0.2-^ 8 ^ /2005 PETITIONER : •, ^ ^i' l'\^>' ^^tl>" '^ RESI^NDENTS ^ Johar Lal Mandavi, Son of Shri Ramnath Mandavi, aged about 41 years, Krishi Vistar Adhikari, Block and Tahsil Durg (C.G.). VERSUS A. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Agriculture Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). /$. The Director, Agriculture Department, Directorate, Raipur(C.G.). . ^ The Deputy Director, Agriculture Department, Durg (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARL MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS. DlRECTION/DIRECTIONS. +1l*l<?)l^TTT^ vj-uc|^|l^|^,yTn<<-t<ico, RrtmyK :..?>Z5.P/o5.,. ^9T q^P (yd^qcQ) ^200 05J 3TT^^TcT7Tf^TT<P ^qT3TI^^T^HW Sarma ?^T8R;?ff^T3T[^?T 2003 sen|ority Mr. P.P. Sahu, leamed couns Mr. Vlvek Sharma, leamecl Chhattisgarh. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitit appointed on 29.06.1993 (Annexure services are regularized on 15.10.; been placed at Sl. Np.8 in the petitioner further submits that all his promoted to the post of Varishtha K| (Annexure P-4). One Mr. Phool Das petitioner as Krishi Vistar Adhikari considering hjs representation^with promoted. It is also submlts tha^ representation to the Director, Agric (Annexure P-8) stating the facts Leamed counsel for the petitioner fij been passed on the representati^ 21.03.2005. The petitioner prays authorities to consider his representat appropriate orders. The respondents are directed 21.03.2005 flted by the petitioner. wit date of receipt of the copy of the orde| In vlew of the foregoing, the elffect th^t c^l^lf^-l HTRcyf^ffe^ ^f^tWIX Zt?3Tf^H3ff^^T for the petitioner. Panel Lawyer for the State of ^ner submits that the petltioner was '-1) as Krishl VlstarAdhlkari and hls (Annexure P-2). Hls name has list. Learned counsel for the iniors in the seniority list havebeen 1shi Vistar Adhikari on 06.10.2003 ^landavi, who was also junSor to the i/as promoted on 14.01.2005 after from the date his juniors were the petitioner has also made a ultural Department on 21.03.2005 his juniors have been promoted. rther contended that no order has ^n filed by the petittoner dated >r a direction of this Court to the |on in accordance with law and pass t|o considerthe representation dated t|ijn a period of one month from the wtit petition stands dtsposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge n^c •y^. SF/FS/2005-20,000 ^ z ^ "c ^" ^ ,/.