1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9026 OF 2010 Baban s/o Tatyarao Chavan .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. M.P. Ambekar, advocate for the petitioner. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 8 th OCTOBER, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Petitioner is raising exception to the interlocutory order passed by the Labour Court during pendnecy of the complaint, refusing to pass interim order in favour of the complainant / petitioner herein. Order passed by the learned Labour Judge, Labour Court on 23-2-2010 has been confirmed by the Industrial court dealing with revision application on 30-7-2010. Considering the interlocutory nature of the challenge, in exercise of powers conferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petition need not be entertained. Rights and entitlement of the petitioner would be determined in the complaint pending before the Labour Court. Petition is 2 devoid of substance hence stands rejected. 2 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp9026.10.odt