:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CONTEMPT PETITION NO.19 OF 2007 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.19 OF 2007 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.19 OF 2007 Shri Naga Tukaram Patil ...Petitioner. v. Chief Land Records Officer, CIDCO & Ors. ...Respondents. WITH WITH WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.20 OF 2007 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.20 OF 2007 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.20 OF 2007 Kisan Bhiwa Nerurkar ...Petitioner. v. Chief Land Records Officer, CIDCO & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.Shriram S. Kulkarni , adv. for the Petitioner. Mr.K.K.Tated, adv. for the Respondent No.1. Mr.D.A.Patil, A.G.P. for the Respondent/State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 24th March, 2008. DATE: 24th March, 2008. DATE: 24th March, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Mr.Patil the learned A.G.P. makes a statement that the award has been already passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer on 19-3-2008 and thus, nothing remains in the contempt petitions. Mr.Kulkarni the learned counsel for the petitioners makes a statement that the Special Land Acquisition Officer hasnot followed proper procedure in passing the award and, therefore, the petitioners have already challenged the said procedure by filing the writ petitions. According to Mr.Kulkarni, these contempt petitions may be disposed :2: off with liberty to the petitioners to follow the remedy, which is available to the petitioners for challenging the said order. 2. In view of the above circumstances, nothing survives in the contempt petitions and in my opinion, there is no need to take any further action. The contempt petitions stand disposed off. Petitioners are at liberty to take appropriate action against the award. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)