IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.2268 of 2007 Rana Chaterjee Versus Shrimati Shushila Yadav ---------------------------------- 9. 28.11.2011 Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh for the opposite party is present. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the opposite party presses this application at flag ‘A’, wherein prayer has been made that order no.8, whereby the civil revision application was finally disposed of, was really passed on 21.10.2011, and instead it has been erroneously typed as 21.11.2011. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the opposite party. It appears from the marginal notes that order no.8 was really passed on 21.10.2011. In that view of the matter, let order no.8 whereby the civil revision application was disposed be, treated to have been disposed of on 21.10.2011, instead of 21.11.2011. This application at flag ‘A” is accordingly disposed of. Order no.8 accordingly stands corrected. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar, J.)