IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 9492 of 2011-J Decided on: November 8, 2011. Smt. Sheetli. Versus State of H.P. & ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. R.S. Chandel, Advocate, vice counsel. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The Writ Petition is filed with the following prayer: “i. That respondents may be ordered to grant work charge status to the petitioner from the due date in terms of Mool Raj Upadhayay Vrs. State of H.P. and as per the law laid down in Phool Maya Vrs. State of H.P. with all the benefits incidental thereof such as full back wages, seniority and pay fixation etc.” 2. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in her favour by Annexure P-1 (judgment), rendered in Phool Maya vs. State of H.P. & ors., CWP(T) No. 10220 of 2008, dated 17.3.2010. 3. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The petitioner submits that she would file appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for her to do so. As and when the same is made, the second respondent will examine the matter in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a further period of three months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment, referred to above. 2 4. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 8th November, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (vs) Judge.