CWP No. 18780 of 2008 ---- Present:- Mr. Amarjit Singh Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.1. ---- As per order dated 3rd November, 2008 respondents were directed to take interview of the petitioner provisionally and the result was to be kept in sealed cover, which is presented before this Court today. Learned counsel for the respondent has placed the sealed cover containing the result of the petitioner and it has been revealed by both counsel that further proceedings in the matter are required only after seeing whether the petitioner has been selected or not. Consequently, I have seen the result, which transpired that the petitioner has not been selected. In these circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this petition pending. Of course, dismissal of this petition would not barred the petitioner from challenging the selection if so advised. Dismissed. Office is directed to re-seal the result and hand it back to leanred counsel for respondent No.1. January 06, 2009 (Ajay Tewari) vj Judge