am^jg 6P&rt •?.' .res°- ^'-^ ^?·u:^hf^s-·· ..^ t^~\^-\-^""' ® ^. ^ffAct'"1' ^v-c'" ^ ^ ) 21^^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P.(C) No. ^32- /2010 PETITIONER fPlaintifn RESPONDENTS fDefendantsl ^^.:s9rCi^ "s^ \ '|^.^^n^| GwfiJi^A^ iU.V^L.-^ ^^vf Sunita Rathor D/o. Sunderlal Rathor, aged about 48 years, R/o. House No. 27/408, Rathor Chowk, Raipur, Tahsil and District - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Bhagwan Das S/o. Kanhaiyalal Rathor Aged about 70 years, R/o. hl.No. No. 23, Behind the Anupam Garden, Dungaji Colony, Raipur (C.G.), 2. Smt. Mala W/o. Balkishan Rathor, aged aboutSO years, R/o. near Shankar Ghee Bhandar, Gadha Fatak, Jabalpur(M.P.) 3. Smt. Kalpna W/o. Shyam Rahtor, C/o. Kapoorchand Rathor, aged about 45 years, R/o. Om Sadan, infront of Karandiker Hospital, Ahmadnagar, Maharastra. 4. Rajkumar Rathor S/o. Bhagwandas Rathor, aged about 47 years, 5. Sajnay Rathor S/o. Bhagwandas Rathor, aged about 40 years, Respondent No. 4 & 5 are R/o. Surendra Electricals, Infront of Nivedita School, Gurunanak Chowk,. Trimurti Chowk, Raipur (C.G.), (Respondent No.l to 5 all are legal representatives of Sarla Rathor wife ,. B of Bhagwan Das Rathor, she died on 27-12-09). /6. Surendra Kumar Rathor, S/o. Khubchand Rathor, aged about 50 years, R/o. Rathor Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.), WRIT PETITION U/A. 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA EQR ISSUANCE OF MANDAMUS AND WRIT OF CERTIORARI C-22 sni^i'^i h-{ SII^T ^*ii^ y^a t- -TEEI ^<|<M|d*<, dTny'l<i. fa'ni'My NIICTI Shliqi . ^.:L^^.^3'^/1 ° "CT^ -sae— fe^T" sn^i ^RiTain'Hf^n S.B. Htwi'We Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra 26.02.2010. Shri V.K. Sharma, counse! Court whtoh shall now have j '+il^^'l 'RTO^ff ^ fe%t •d^l^.K ^sipgiian^i for the petitioner. Heard. After arguir^ for sometim^, teamed counsel Tor the petitioner piays for wfthdrawai of the writ p|et'rtion with a further prayer that the risdtetton to try the suit rray be directed to disp<»eof the suit as|early as possibte. Havir^ consklered the fa|ct that the suit initiatly ffled fay the petitioner before the Civil Judge plass-11, Raipur was pending sjncei March, ^XX), it is expected thafl if the petitioner submits the plaint before the Court having juris^tetion, the suit shail be decided expeditiously. Accordingly, the vwit petit the aforesaid obsen/ation. bn is dismissed as withdrawn with Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge [«^fe3