1 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 969/2009 Anupama Dixit Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. Date of order : 26.02.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. S.K.M. Vyas, for the petitioner. Mr. R.L.Jangid, Addl. Advocate General for respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the instant case stands concluded by the decision of this Court in Ram Raj Tada Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others and bunch of writ petitions being SBCW No.4005/2008 decided on 8.8.2008 and in Uda Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors., SBCW No.6084/08 decided on 18.11.2008, and in Lalita Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. SBCW No.5247/07 decided on 26.9.08. This fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the respondents. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed by this Court Ram Raj Tada Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors., SBCW No. 4005/08 decided on 8.8.2008 and the respondents are directed to consider candidature of the petitioner for the purpose of appointment to the post of Prabodhak as per the provisions of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Prabodhak Service Rules, 2008 and if the petitioner stands in merit and is otherwise eligible, appointment be accorded to her. No costs. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp 2 S.B.Civil Misc. Stay Petition No. 1811/09 In S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 969/2009 Date of order : 26.02.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. S.K.M. Vyas, for the petitioner. Mr. R.L.Jangid, Addl. Advocate General for respondents. Since the writ petition itself has been allowed, the stay petition also stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp