1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.03.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2687 of 2011 SP.Subramanian ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai. 2.State rep. By Inspector of Police, Ponnamaravathi Police Station, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the 2nd respondent the Inspector of Police, Ponnamaravathi Police Station, Pudukkottai, to give necessary police protection to the life of the petitioner and his family members as and when required by the petitioner on the basis of his representation dated 27.01.2011. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan For Respondents : Mr.L.Murugan Govt. Advocate (Crl.side) ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 2n respondent the Inspector of Police, Ponnamaravathi Police Station, Pudukkottai, to give necessary police protection to the life of the petitioner and his family members as and when required by the petitioner on the basis of his representation dated 27.01.2011. 2. Heard Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.L.Murugan learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that in order to wreak revenge regarding the property the proposed accused persons criminally trespassed in the petitioner’s property and formed into unlawful assembly along with deadly weapons and threatened the petitioner and his family members with dire consequences. He would further submit that immediately the petitioner lodged a complaint with the 2n respondent, who refused to take any action. Further, the proposed accused persons had threatened the petitioner and again he lodged a complaint before the 2nd respondent, who again has not taken any action. He would further submit that the petitioner has no other option, on 27.01.2011 made a representation through post to the 1st respondent for police protection, but till now no action was taken. Hence, the petitioner has come forward with the petitioner and therefore, he would request the Court to give police protection to the petitioner and his family members. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit that they would give police protection only to the life and limb of the petitioner and his family members. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (criminal side), the respondent police is directed to give police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and his family members. 6. With the above said direction, this criminal original petition is ordered accordingly to that extent. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(LA) /TRUE COPY/ Assistant Registrar To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District,Pudukkottai. 2. The Inspector of Police, Ponnamaravathi Police Station, Pudukkottai District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2687 of 2011 vsm PA/23.03.2011/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/