A33 1N THE HIGH CUU RT OF CHHA’ITISGARH : BILASPUR Wn't PEtition (S) N0. 4406 of 2008 Peti1ioner Versus t0 Dashrath Singh Kashyap, Agad 48 Years, S/o Shri Kanhai Ram Kas£ya , Caste — Bhatra (Scheduled Tribe), Occupation — Service, Officer Grade II, Working as Branch Ma11ager, Chhattisgarh Rural Bank, Branch Usn'beda, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh. Respondents 1. Chhattisgarh Rural Bank, Through General Manager, Zonal Ofiice, Hatkachora, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh. General Manager, Chhattisgarh Rural Bank, Zonal Oiiice, Hatkachora, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSI‘YI‘UTION OF INDIA (SB: Hcn’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J) Shn' Ranbir Singh Marhas, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Prafull Bharat, Advocate for the respondents. O R D E R (Passed on this 1 1th Day ofAugust, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest the matter on merits, at this stage. However, the respondents/authorities may be directed to consider and decide the representation dated 31.7.2008 (Annexure P/7), in accordance with law, on its own merits, expeditiously. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that if the representation has been made, there is no reason asto why the same should not be considered and decided, in accordance with Law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of three weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy ofthis order. In View of the above fair and categorical statement made by learned counsel appearing for the respondents, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this matter. In View of the foregoing, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge C