c§ imj/ (D / IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF c‘HHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NoEZG’é /2010 PETITIONER / Dhanendra Singh Rajput, son of Shri Atmaram Rajput, aged about ‘¢O years, Head Master, Government Primary School, Kasniyna, Block Podi~Uproda District Korbao(C.G.) t/ / RESPONDENTS D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C,G.) /2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deportment, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) /3, Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deportment, Korba District Korba (C. G.) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA \W_MN_%_A~__N,_ N.“ " W (VERSUS 4. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretaly, Tribal Welfare Deportment 9’1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIEGARH AT B£LA$PUR WRIT PETmON ($) No. 20136 of 2010 PETITIOBLEB : Dhanendra Singh Rajput. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : skate of’Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETiTiON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTlON OF INDIA SB: Hen'b!e Shyi Satish K. Aggbm‘n .i Present: . Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate appearing on behaif of Shri Amit Kumar Sharma Advocate for the petitioner. Shri NNRGy, P.L. for ihe State/rewondenis. aRDER {ORAL} {Passed on 30th day of Agril, 2010} 1. By this petition, the petitioner seek a direction to the respondents to pay two advance increments on passing of B.Ed. examination, on his own expenses, before entering into'service. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present case is no longer res integra as the same has been considered and decided by the Supreme Court in Ashe Saxena V. State ofMP. & 0:5.f 3. Learned counsel further submits that the instant petition is squareiy‘ covered by the decision as aforestated, Thus, the petitioner may be permitted to make representations to the respondent authorities to decide his case for grant of two increments in the tight of a‘iorestated decision, subject to verification of the tact of possession of B.Ed. certificate on his own expenses before entering into service. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same wiil be considered and decided, in accordance with iaw and in the tight of the decision of the Supreme Court in Ashe Saxena (supra) within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. U1 in view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. nothing survives in this petition tor adjudication. \ Sd/— 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Amit Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ‘i 2009 (In) Mere (so) 59 \ l l