IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT ^^F ^ Suidto Bench CONTEMPT PETITION N0. V ^4 OF 2011 :- ^Vinod' Sharina, aged about 42 years, S/o Shri Mohan Lal Sharma, Occupation -Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, R/o village Loharsison, District Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS :- B.P. Bhardwaj, Chef Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Masturi, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur( C.G.) Conteinnors CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1950, READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF THE COURT ACT. ^- XI-HC-22 W^T^T f<-ii.ch wi^r $n^ict) 'ylia ^ •ysr ^||<4td<LI, ^nl^^Ko, [^^i<Hy 3ff^T 'q^ra? _J^^.....<^^-[C.).^1U^ ^ Miwi*t<icb^'"w-v""""-;7r-^""^ (^ I^^T' ^n^T'^<n^R Trf?^ SB : Hon'ble Shri ManindraMoha 09-05-2011 Shri Rahul Birtharey, counse Heard. cr»i^(<y1<fll"RTR^Tf ^ fe^t iFt^K '^'3ti^P:T3:?T^T 1 Shrivastava. J. for the petitioner. This petition has been filed b^ the petitioner on the atlegation that by not granting the appointment on th|e post of Shiksha Karmi Grade-11, the order passed by this Court on 03-C No. 1845 of 2001 as well as order dd Writ Petition (S) No.7432 of 2010 h^ Learned counsel for the petit| grievance is that though similarly appointment on the post of Shiksh^ though vide order dated 21-06-20(] granted appointment on the post| meantime, other similarly situated have been promoted to the post of | petitioner's claim is that he shoutd Shiksha Karmi Grade-11. On grie\| 3-2007 (Annexure C-1) in Writ Petition ted 02-02-2011 passed by this Court in \/e been willfuliy disobeyed. . oner submits that the petitioner's main situated persons have been granted Karmi Grade-II, yet he has not been granted appointment on the said p(^st in comptiance of order dated 03-05- 2007 passed by this Court in Writ P^tition No. 1845 of 2001 to consider the representation of the petitioner in ^ccordance with law, He submits that 17 (Annexure C-2), the petitioner was of Shiksha Karmi Grade-111, in the ^ersons, with whom parity is claimed, ^hiksha Karmi Grade-11, therefore, the |>e granted appointment on the post of |ance remainjng unredressed, a writ petition was filed by the petitioner rjumbered as W.P.(S)No.7432 of 2010, which too was dismissed as wijthdrawn with iiberiy to pureue the representation and finaily, the petitioher has been communicated vide order dated 23-03-2011 by. the Chief ^xecutive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Masturj, District Bilaspur (Annexur^ C-7) that the petitioner having been [^! ^TS^ I-HC-22 ^TT^T-^T ^ri^a^i 5n^ict) ^a <t- Tumane -3~5c[ r^l^Krtq, ^Tll^l^Ko. fa^l^y sn^-q^ G^'^<^-}^\^1 »[WCfll^^|ch "^ 2bo •f^ST' ^n^r ^RH^R ^rf^r -z- granted appointment cn the post of St accepted, no further :action can be claim of parity raised by the petitionei higher authorities woutd be complied \A liksha Karmi Grade-tll, which he has t^<en by this offioe and in respect of order as and when passed by the lith. Vide order dated 03-05-200' respondent authority to consider the vide order dated 21-06-2007, the pel the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade-1 appointment on the post of ShiRsha Kc of other similarly situated persons, w been examined by the Court nor thej petition was filed by the petitionerfor dismissed as withdrawn with liberty Therefore, in the opinion of this| petitioner is at tiberiy to take recourl avaitable under the law for ventilc appointment on the post of ShikshaK| of other similarly situated persons o( claimed. With the aforesaid liberty, fhe ^ ^ 'RTR^lf'? fe^ <F^^l< '^^rt^m'STT^T a direction was issued to the r{epresentation. tt is not disputed that ptioner was granted appointment cn (ubsequent claim of the petjtioner for krmi Grade-11 in view of the promotion |ith whom parity is ctaimed, has not is any order in this regard. A writ ledressal of his grievance, which was to ^ursue the representation. Court, no contempt is made out The e to such legal remedy as may be ion of his grievance for grant of rmi Grade-11 in view ofthe promotion the said post, with whom parity is tition stands disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [^^a ffl^-