1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 3195 of 2002 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.9.2011 *** Jagdev Singh and Ors. .. Appellants VS. Kamaljit Singh & Ors. .. Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR, Present:- Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Sarjit Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shikha Sharma, Advocate for the respondents. ARVIND KUMAR, J. The appellants are the subsequent purchasers of the land, fully detailed in the head note, in respect of which a suit for specific performance was filed by the plaintiffs titled as Kamaljit Singh & Ors. Vs. Gurbachan Singh. It is apt to mention here that Gurbachan Singh had died during pendency of the suit and his legal representatives were brought on record. The appellants-subsequent vendees were also impleaded as defendants-party pursuant to an application filed under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. The suit after contest was dismissed by the learned trial Court. However, on an appeal filed by Kamaljit Singh etc., the same was allowed by the learned appellate Court below. This has necessitated the appellants to file the present regular second appeal. During pendency of the appeal, the parties have entered into settlement and in this regard joint affidavit of appellants and contesting respondents No.1 and 2-plaintiffs has been placed on record, which is taken on record. As per the joint affidavit, it has been agreed between the parties that the appellants shall pay Rs.32,40,000/- to respondents No.1 and 2- plaintiffs, who in turn shall raise no objection for allowing the appeal and 2 also shall not claim any right, title or interest in the suit property. The parties have also mutually agreed to withdraw the cases, civil and criminal, pending between them. The details of six drafts dated 26.8.2011 each amounting to Rs.5,40,000/-, three in favour of Kanwaljit Singh and rest one in the name of Narinder Singh, have been given in the affidavit. In view of the consensus arrived at between the parties, the instant appeal is allowed, thereby setting aside the judgment of the appellate Court below. The suit of the plaintiffs is accordingly dismissed. The parties are bound by the compromise, as reflected out from their joint affidavit. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE September 30,2011 Jiten