ao14.10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 14 OF 2010 Shri Prakash Laxman Bhosale .. APPELLANT VERSUS Shri Ramesh Narayan Bari & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. G.D. Jain, advocate holding for Mr. A.B. Girase, advocate for the appellant. Mr. Mukul Kulkarni, advocate for respondent no. 5. Mr. S.P. Brahme, advocate for respondent nos. 6 to 8. ===== CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 7 th MARCH, 2011. PER COURT : 1 Appellant is raising exception to the order passed by the Incharge 2 nd Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn., Jalgaon on 8-1-2010 below exh. 6 in Special Civil Suit no. 250/2009 thereby rejecting the application tendered by appellant herein seeking an order of temporary injunction against respondents / original defendants. The appellants / original plaintiffs sought restraint order against ao14.10 2 original defendant nos. 1 to 5 restraining them from executing sale deed in favour of original defendant nos. 6 to 8. Similarly restraint order is sought against original defendant nos. 6 to 8 from securing execution of the sale- deed from original defendant nos. 1 to 5 / respondents herein. 2 This court while directing issuance of notice on 8-2-2010 directed the parties to maintain status quo in relation to alienation of the property. In view of order passed on 15-9-2010, the order of status quo granted by this court has been directed to be continued till disposal of the appeal. It is thus clear that the order of status quo granted by this court, in relation to alienation of the property, is operative since more than one year. The suit is presented in the year 2009 and has not yet been disposed of. It is informed that while admitting the appeal, record and proceeding has been called for and the same is received in this court. 3 In the facts and circumstances of the case, the ends of justice would met if the trial court is directed to dispose of pending suit as expeditiously as possible. Thus, without entering into the merits of the controversy involved in the matter, trial court is directed to dispose of the pending suit as expeditiously as possible and preferably before commencement of Diwali ao14.10 3 vacation. The interim order passed by this court on 8-2-2010 and confirmed on 15-5-2010 shall remain operative till disposal of Special Civil Suit no. 250/2009. Appeal from order stands disposed of. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. 4 Record and proceeding be transmitted to the trial court forthwith. ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE dyb