1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.1075/2009. : : M/s Shriram Contractor & Anr. Vs. Urban Improvement Trust, Ajmer & Ors. : : Date of Order 24.4.2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. Rajesh Kapoor for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj K. Tiwari for the respondent (s). Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that as per originally notified tender notice, the bid for the work of supply of Computer Operators was to be opened on 14.10.2008 and petitioner also submitted his bid. The bid could be submitted upto 3.00 pm on 14.10.2008, but curiously enough respondents surrepetiously received tender of respondent No.3 and opened the bid on 13.10.2008 and awarded contract to respondent No.3. It is submitted that when petitioner reached the Office of respondent No.1 on 14.10.2008, he was surprised to know that contract was already awarded to respondent No.3. 2 3. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that date of receiving of tenders was inadvertently indicated as 14.10.2008 in the newspaper and this occurred due to bonafide mistake whereas on the approved performa of notice inviting tender, which was sent for publication in newspaper, indicated 13.10.2008. Copy of that performa is on record, which indicates that 14.10.2008 was struck off and last date of notice inviting tender was indicated as 13.10.2008. Learned counsel submitted that in order to put to an end the controversy, they have decided to cancel the award of tender of respondent No.3 and issue fresh tender. In view of statements of learned counsel for the respondents this writ petition has become infructuous, which is accordingly disposed of. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/- Item No.45.