IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP Nos. 4384 and 4386 of 2011 Decided on: 14th June, 2011. 1. CWP No. 4384 of 2011 Basti Ram Vs. State of H.P. and others 2. CWP No. 4386 of 2011 Hem Chand Vs. State of H.P. and others Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG for respondents. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim the benefit of ad hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and increments. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram vs. State. 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioners submit that they would file appropriate representations furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for them to do so. 2 3. Therefore, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter, after verifying the facts, in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment referred to above. The pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 14th June, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (K/vt) Judge. 3 (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 14th June, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (K/vt) Judge.