The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.24634 of 2011 Date: 15.09.2011 Between: B.Vasanth Kumar Reddy ..... Petitioner AND 1.Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Superintending Engineer, Public Health Circle, Nellore and 3 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri C.Raghu Counsel for respondent Nos.1, 2 & 4: GP for Municipal Administration and Urban Development Counsel for respondent No.3: GP for Revenue The Court made the following: Order: The limited grievance of the petitioner in this Writ Petition is that even though the contract period under Agreement No.32/2009-2010 at Aadi Andhra Colony and Kakumanivari Kostalu, Kandukur Municipality under Indiramma Phase – I & II Programmes, Nellore, has expired and the contract became abortive, respondent No.2 has not been permitting the petitioner to lift the material placed by him at the site and returning him the EMD and security deposits to the tune of Rs.42,830/-. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration, representing respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4, placed before this Court a fax message from respondent No.4 wherein it is stated that the material is in the petitioner’s custody; that the petitioner has not, so far, represented for return of the material or refund of the EMD and; that the request of the petitioner for return of the material will be considered and EMD will be returned, after closing the work, if an appropriate representation is made. Sri C.Raghu, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that in view of the above stand taken by respondent No.4, his client may be permitted to make a representation and a suitable direction may be given to respondent No.4 to consider and dispose of the same. In the light of the above submissions of the learned Counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to make a representation to respondent No.4 for return of the material and refund of the EMD and other deposits. Within three weeks from the date of receipt of such representation, respondent No.4 shall take appropriate decision thereon and communicate the same to the petitioner. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.30267 of 2011, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 15th September, 2011 LUR