[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 250 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 250 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 250 OF 2007 Ajay Vishnu Naik & Ors. ..Applicants V/s The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr. H.N. Mirashi, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. S.V. Gajre, APP for the State. Mr. T.R. Patel, Advocate for respondent nO.2. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 5TH APRIL, 2007. DATE : 5TH APRIL, 2007. DATE : 5TH APRIL, 2007. P.C. . Heard Mr. Mirashi, learned Counsel for the applicants and Mr. T.R. Patel, learned Counsel for the respondent No.2. Respondent No..2 is also present before the Court in-person. She had filed case against the applicants under Section 498A IPC. This application is filed to quash the proceeding on the ground that the parties have amicably settled the matter. The consent terms have been filed before the family Court, Mumbai in Petition No.A 405/2003 and as per the said consent terms parties have taken divorce by mutual consent. Learned Counsel Mr. Patel, for respondent No.2 states that the said consent terms are fully complied with and he has no objection to quash the proceeding. Therefore, in the [2] interest of justice the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.)