IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA SECOND APPEAL NO. 48 OF 2006 SMT. NARMADABAI DAMODAR DIUKAR AND ....Appellants 7 ORS., Versus SMT. MEENA MANVENDRA DIUKAR AND 5 ....Respondents ORS., Mr. C. A. Ferreira, Mr. G. Teles, and Ms. F. Misquita, Advocates for the appellants. Mr. Nitin Sardessai, Advocates for respondents No.5 and 6. Coram:- S.K. SHAH, J. Date:- 19th January, 2007 P.C. Heard Counsel on both sides. There is concurrent finding of facts that the respondents have acquiesced the tenancy from a co-owner and both the Courts below have dismissed the suit. I do not find any perversity or illegality in this finding and, therefore, I do not find any merit in the second appeal. The second appeal is, therefore, dismissed. S.K. SHAH, J. ssm.