IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 8TH DECEMBER 2006 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 RP.No. 1013 of 2006(P) IN W.P.(C)18834/06 --------------------------------------------------------- REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT --------------------------------------------- PURUSHOTHAMAN, S/O.VELU, KALATHIPARAMBIL, PERUMTHURUTH MURI, KANJIKUZHY VILLAGE, CHERTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER ----------------------------------------- ASOKAN, S/O.DAMODARAN, AGED 57, RES. AT KALASIVELIYIL, KANJIKUZHY VILLAGE, CHERTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.V.R.KESAVA KAIMAL THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J. -------------------------- R.P.NO.1013 OF 2006 ------------------------- DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2006 JUDGMENT This review petition is filed against the judgment dated 4.10.06. As per that judgment, this Court directed Sub Court, Cherthala to try E.A.227/03 and E.A.226/98 jointly. This petition is filed contending that E.A.226/98 was subsequently dismissed and therefore it is not possible to try both the cases together. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for respondent pointed out that when this Court directed joint trial 0n 4.10.2006, both the petitions were pending and the dismissal of one E.A. was only subsequent to that order. In such circumstances, I do not find any reason to review the judgment in W.P.(c) No.18834/06 dt. 4.10.2006, as there is neither any apparent error or sufficient reason to review. Review petition is dismissed. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,JUDGE Acd