IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.129 of 2011 Date of decision: 5.1.2011 Kasturi Devi …..Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ……Respondents CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon’ble Mr.Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr.Vimal Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to quash a notification dated 30.5.2005, issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short, the Act), proposing to acquire a vast tract of land, including 200 square yards land owned by the petitioner. Further challenge is laid to a declaration issued on 22.5.2006. Still further, award passed on 16.7.2007 has also been challenged. At the time of arguments, it transpired that the petitioner has purchased the land after issuance of notification under Section 4 of the Act. Obviously, on account of that, she has not filed any objection under Section 5-A of the Act. She remained satisfied with the acquisition and did not file any writ petition before passing of an award on 16.7.2007. To claim relief, reliance has been placed upon an order passed by this Court on 21.7.2010 in CWP No.12711 of 2010 (P19), wherein regarding an adjoining land owner, Civil Writ Petition No.129 of 2011 directions were issued to the authorities to re-consider his case for release of the land. It is not in dispute that the said land owner had acquired ownership over the land under acquisition before issuance of notification under Section 4 of the Act and had also filed objections to the proposed acquisition. The said owner also sent a legal notice to the authorities concerned for release of his land. Petitioner’s case is different than the petitioners in CWP No.4869 of 2010. No case is made out for interference. Dismissed. (Jasbir Singh) Judge 05.01.2011 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) gk Judge 2