IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 1618 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 07/09/2004 in WP NO : 13726 OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Sri Odupu Raghavulu S/o Jawaharanagar Grampanchayat, Shameerpet (M) R.R.District ..... APPELLANT AND 1.The Collector (Panchayat Wing) Ranga Reddy District. 2.The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary to Goverment , Panchayat Raj & Rural Development (PTS.II) Department , Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 3.The Commissioner ,Panchayat Raj Rural Development , Andhra Pradesh , Hyderabad 4.Shankar Goud S/o Yaadaiah Goud Jawaharnagar Of Shameerpet (M) Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: MR.KOMIREDDY KRISHNAVIJAY AZAD Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. Counsel for the Respondent No.4: Mrs.S.Nanda The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 1618 of 2004 JUDGMENT: (PER Sri Bilal Nazki, J) Respondent No.4 filed a writ petition, which has been disposed of by the learned Single Judge with the following directions: “The writ petition is disposed of at the interlocutory stage remitting the matter to the Government. The Government will do well to consider all questions raised by the writ petitioner and pass a reasoned order. It shall be open to the Government to entertain the application of any third party from the village to intervene in the matter. The Government may pass appropriate orders in the revision petition within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till then the petitioner shall be continued as Sarpanch.” The present appellant was respondent in the writ petition. He has challenged this order. We fail to understand how the appellant can challenge the order by which he is not aggrieved at all. Writ Appeal is misconceived, which is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ------------------------ (BILAL NAZKI, J) 14th October, 2004 ---------------------- (S.ANANDA REDDY, J) LUR Copy to: 1.The Collector (Panchayat Wing) Ranga Reddy District. 2.The Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj & Rural Development (PTS.II) Department , Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 4.The Commissioner , Panchayat Raj Rural Development , Andhra Pradesh , Hyderabad 5.Two CCS to G.P. for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, High Court Buildings, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (O.U.T.) 6. Two CD copies.