IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33654 of 2010 KAUSHALIYA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 11.10.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No. 50 of 2010 for offence punishable under Sections 323, 325, 337, 448, 307, 379, 384/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner, with reference to the allegation set out in the F.I.R., submits that a plain reading thereof shows that although there are specific allegations of assault on the part of Mukesh Kumar and his wife Sintu Devi but insofar as the present petitioner is concerned, there is no allegation of any overt act except that she accompanied the aforesaid accused persons. Learned counsel thus submits that merely because the petitioner is said to have accompanied the aforesaid Mukesh Kumar and Sintu Devi to the house of the informant that she has been involved in the present case even in absence of any specific over act. Taking into consideration the circumstances and the submission of learned counsel, let the petitioner Kaushaliya Devi, in the event of her arrest/surrender within 2 a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No. 50 of 2010, subject to the conditions set out in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)