IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 10TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 21ST MAGHA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 4440 of 2007() ------------------------------ CRA.NO. 174/04 OF ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, FAST TRACK COURT NO. I, PALAKKAD IN ST. NO. 2340/99 OF J.F.C.M. CHITTUR. REVN. PETITIONER(S): REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED ---------------------------------------------------------- SUBRAMANIAN, S/O.AYYAPPAN, AYILOOR, MANAGING PARTNER, MAHASUDARSANAN CORPORATION. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE ---------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. MUHAMMED YOUSUF, S/O.HANEEFA RAWTHER, MANGODEKALATHIL, PUDUNAGARAM, CHITTUR. 3. THE MAHASUDARSANAN CORPORATION, KOLLENGODU KAMBOLOTHIL, KIZHAKKETHARA AMSOM, CHITTUR, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING PARTNER. 4. KUNJIPORINJU, ADVOCATE, BEAUTY BUILDING AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR, ADVOCATE RECEIVER OF MAHASUDARSANAN CORPORATION APPOINTED AS PER THE ORDER OF SUB COURT, THRISSUR IN IP 8/98. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. JAYAKRISHNAN THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ALONG WITH OTHER CONNECTED CASES ON 10/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE ............................................... Crl.R.P. Nos.4279/07, 4439/07 and Crl.R.P. 4440 of 2007 ............................................... Dated: 10th February 2009 O R D E R When these Revisions came up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the common petitioner submitted that the since the revision petitioner is no more, he is not pressing these Revisions. Accordingly, these Revision Petitions are dismissed as not pressed. Dated, this the 10th day of February, 2009. Sd/-V. Ramkumar, Judge. /true copy/