[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.3729 OF 2008 Mr.Michael Rosebuth Antao ..Applicant Vs. The State of Mah. and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.Shaunak Mehta Adv. for Mr.Niranjan Mundargi Advocate for Applicant Mr.Deepak S.Paikrao Av.for Respondent no.2 Ms.A.A.Mane, APP for State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : DECEMBER 2, 2008 DATE : DECEMBER 2, 2008 DATE : DECEMBER 2, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant-original accused, the learned advocate for the respondent no.2-original complainant and and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The complainant is present in Court. 2. The applicant is seeking quashing of CC No.1416/PW/2008 which is pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 32nd Court, Bandra, Mumbai. The said case pertains to CR No.314 of 2008 registered with Vakola Police Station, Mumbai. The said case is mainly under Sections 324 and 354 [-2-] of IPC. 3. The learned advocate for the complainant stated that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and in view thereof the complainant does not wish to prosecute the applicant, hence, the case be quashed. 4. In view of the amicable settlement of the dispute between the parties, CC No.1416/PW/2008 pending before the Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 32nd Court, Bandra, Mumbai and the proceedings relating thereto are quashed. 5. Application is disposed of accordingly. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]