1 lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6483 OF 2009 Jagatsing Dattasingh Labana & Anr. : Petitioner versus Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Development Authority (MMRDA) and anr. : Respondents. Mr. V N Tayade for the Petitioner. Mr S M Kamble for Respondent No.2. CORAM : S B MHASE & R M SAVANT, JJ. DATE : 4th August 2009 P.C. 1. Heard. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that in respect of grounds set out in Paras 5 and 7 of the above Writ Petition, the Petitioner is agitating his grievance before this Court. We have perused those grounds. They are not tenable in law and this Court in its writ jurisdiction cannot go into the said aspects set out in Paras 5 and 7. The Petition also involves disputed questions of fact. We, therefore, do not deem it fit to entertain the above Petition, which is accordingly dismissed. [R.M.SAVANT, J] [S.B.MHASE, J]