IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 270 of 2002 M/B) 1. Stapal S/o Sri Nattha Singh 2. Gyanendra Kumar s/o Sri Budh Singh 3. Satish Kumar S/o Umrao Singh 4. Snajay S/o Sri Rameshwar All R/o Nalhera Anantpur, Pargana Bhagwanpur, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar. …….. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Secretary, Ministry of Revenue and Land Management, Uttaranchal Shasan. 2. Director of Consolidation, Uttaranchal, District Dehradun. 3. Deputy Director of Consolidation, District Haridwar. 4. District Magistrate, Haridwar. …… Respondents Mr. Sharad Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.K.P. Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttaranchal. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon. Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon. P.C. Verma, J. P.C. VERMA, J. (Oral) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitiones for the follwoing reliefs: “I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to allocate Khasra plot no. 377 to any tenure holder. II. Issue, writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus excluding Khasra plot no. 377 from the purview of the Consolidation Proceedings as being graveyard a land reserved in earlier consolidation for the said purpose. III. Issue any other suitable writ order or directions which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. IV. Award the cost of the petition to the petitioner.” 2. These reliefs can be granted by the District Deputy Director, Consolidation under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act. Therefore, the petitioners are relegated to approach the District Deputy Director, Consolidation with all the averments made in the writ petition and the District Deputy Director, Consolidation shall pass appropriate order after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties in the matter within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment. The District Deputy Director, Consolidation may pass appropriate interim order, if it is required in the facts and circumstances of the case. 3. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. (P.C.Verma, J. ) (Rajeev Gupta, C,J,) 17.02.2006 17.02.2006 G