IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18330 of 2011 1. Rajdhar Yadav @ Raman Kumar 2. Manjula Devi Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3 29.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners is apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 363 and 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of enticing away the minor niece of the informant. The thrust of accusation is against Pankaj Kumar. Though, the petitioner was not named in the F.I.R, but from 164 Cr.P.C. statement, it appears that the victim agreed that Pankaj, being the son of the petitioners, established the forceful physical relationship in the knowledge of these petitioners. It appears that one F.I.R. named accused Rajesh Sah has been granted anticipatory bail. It further appears that Pankaj Kumar has been declared juvenile, though, in 164 Cr.P.C. statement of the victim girl, she got her age recorded as 17 years. 2 Considering the fact that the thrust of accusation is against Pankaj Kumar, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 69/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)