IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8118 of 2007 SUMAN KUMARI, wife of Nand Kishore Pandit, resident of village Rampur Kesho, P.S. Shyampur Bhatahan, District Sheohar … Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through the Secretary Rural Development, Old Secretariate, Bailey Road, Patna 2. The District Collector, Sheohar 3. The District Education Superintendent, District Sheohar, Bihar 4. The Block Development Officer, Block Dumari Katsari, P.S. Shyampur Bhataha, District Sheohar 5. The Child Development Project Officer, Prakhand Dumari Katsari, District Sheohar 6. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Fulkahan Block Dumari Katsari, District Sheohar 7. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Fulkahan Prakhand Dumari Katsari, District Sheohar 8. The Deputy Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Fulkahan Prakhand Dumari Katsari, District Sheohar 9. The Headmaster newly created School, Rampur Kesho (Bichala Tola), P.S. Shyampur, Bhatahan, District Sheohar 10. Geeta Kumari, wife of Ramendra Kumar Resident of village Rampur Kesho, P.S. Shyampur Bhatahan, District Sheohar … Respondents. ----------- 2. 26.11.2009 No one appears for the petitioner. Counsel for the State is present. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows: “Through this application the petitioner craves indulgence of this Hon’ble Court to issue an appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions commanding the respondents to quash the order of selection dated 20.2.2007 (Annexure 1) passed by 2 the selection Committee, Gram Panchayat Fulkahan, whereby and whereunder the respondent no.10 has been selected for the post of Seveka at newly approved Anganbari Centre no.70, comes under Ward No.5 of the Fulkahan Gram Panchayat by violating the rules of selection of Anganbari Sevika/ Sahayeka 2006. And also be further pleased to grant any other relief/ reliefs for which the petitioner be found entitled in the eye of law.” From the reading of the writ application and especially the representation filed by the petitioner on 23.5.2007 just 19 days prior to presenting of the writ application it would be clear that the grievance of the petitioner as against the selection and appointment of respondent no.10 was on the issue of mapping or the change of venue of the meeting of Gram Sabha. The very fact that the petitioner without waiting for result of the said representation had moved this Court and the respondents thereafter could not have taken any decision in view of the matter becoming subjudice would make this writ 3 application premature. None-the-less as the petitioner seems to have raised her grievance against the selection and appointment of respondent no.10 on 3.4.2007 itself, this Court would give liberty to the petitioner to approach the Collector of Sheohar District by adducing written evidence of filing of such representation by the petitioner and in the event the Collector is satisfied as with regard to filing of such representation prior to presentation/ filing of the representation of the petitioner he would examine the matter and pass an appropriate order after extending opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as also respondent no.10 and the concerned representative of the Gram Panchayat. With the aforementioned observations and directions, this application stands disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/