IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.5289 of 1994 Date of Decision : February 11, 2010. Smt.Rajinder Kaur .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Ranjit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Charu Tuli, Senior DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel has filed the reply-affidavit of Ms.Sunita Kiran, District Education Officer (EE), Amritsar, which is taken on record. As per the averments made in the preliminary submissions of the said affidavit, the petitioner has already been granted the JST Scale of Rs.220-400 w.e.f. 1.9.1975, i.e., from the date of his appointment and she continued to draw the said pay scale and/or consequential revised pay scales till she got pre-mature retirement on 1.1.2003. Learned State counsel further submits that the pensionary C.W.P.No .5289 of 1994 (O&M) 2 benefits admissible to the petitioner have also been settled and arrears of pay, as per the decision contained in Annexure R-1, have already been released to the petitioner. In this view of the matter, nothing survives in this writ petition which is accordingly disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 11-02-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE