-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6771 OF 2011 M/s. Shangrilla Resort & Water Park. ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. S. V. Gavand for the petitioner. Ms. P. S. Cardozo, AGP for the respondents. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : September 21, 2011. P. C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGP for the respondents. By the order dated 15/2/2011, respondent no.2-the licencing authority suspended the food licence in respect of petitioner’s premises for the period of three days. When the petitioner’s premises were inspected by the licencing authority on 17/10/2010, the petitioner was found to be in violation of 42 conditions of the food licence granted to him for running restaurant and water park. The petitioner was accordingly given notice on 20/1/2011 asking him to show cause as to why his licence should not be suspended. The petitioner was asked to give reply within 7 days. The petitioner did not file reply and therefore on 15/2/2011 the order was passed by respondent no.2 whereby the food licence in respect srp -: 2 :- of the petitioner's restaurant and water park was suspended for 3 days. This order was confirmed by the appellate authority in an appeal by the petitioner. 2. After the suspension of licence by respondent no.2 on 15/2/2011, the petitioner filed reply on 17/2/2011. I have perused copy of the reply, which is at Exhibit-C to the present petition. The reply shows that the breaches alleged by the show cause notice dated 20/1/2011, are mostly rectified by the petitioner. Thus, prima facie, the petitioner has admitted the breaches of licence conditions. Looking into the number of breaches and the fact that petitioner's licence was previously also suspended in the year 2006, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition is, therefore, dismissed. (RANJIT MORE, J.)