FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1703/2010 IN CRI. APPEAL NO. 812/2005 1. This criminal application is filed on behalf of the State today with the Registry of this Court. Learned A.P.P. Mr. Godbharle mentioned this matter at 02.30 p.m. He made a statement that copy of this application is served to learned counsel Mr. Vibhute who appears for respondents No.1 to 4 in appeal No.812/2005, filed on behalf of the applicant-State. At the request of learned A.P.P. we have taken up this Criminal Application at the end of todays cause list. Papers were called from Registry. In this Criminal appeal No.812/2005 this Court by the order dated 20.04.2010 directed the Superintendent of Police to remain present before this Court on 28.04.2010. Reason is for non service of respondent No.5 in an appeal which is pending from 2005 in this Court. Obviously Cri. Appeal No.812/2005 is not on todays cause list and likely to come up tomorrow i.e. on 28.04.2010. Though Advocate Mr. Vibhute who appears for respondents No.1 to 4 is not present, at the request of learned A.P.P. we have taken up this criminal application for hearing. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders 2. Applicant, in this criminal application, has made a statement that fresh address of respondent No.5 is furnished to the Registry on 26.04.2010. Said respondent No.5 is represented by Advocate Mr. Vibhute. According to learned A.P.P. , V.P. of Adv. Mr. Vibhute for respondent No.5 is on record. Thus service of respondent No.5 is complete. All the respondents now stand served. In this view of the matter, learned A.P. P. seeks re-calling of the order passed by us on 20.04.2010 directing the Superintendent of Police to remain present before this Court on 28.04.2010. 3. In our view, since compliance as ordered by this court has been completed and respondent No.5 is now represented by Advocate, presence of Superintendent of Police, Latur before this Court on 28.04.2010 is not necessary. Said order passed by us on 20.04.2010 directing Superintendent of Police to remain present before this Court on 28.04.2010 stands re- called. Criminal application No.1703/2010 is accordingly allowed and disposed of. Let the Criminal appeal No.812/2005 be appear on tomorrows cause list as scheduled early. 4. Authentic copy of this order is permitted to the requesting parties as per usual procedure. ( S. S. SHINDE, J. ) ( S. B. DESHMUKH , J. ) Dt : 27.04.2010 aaa/812.05 ...