IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14936 of 2009 1. PYARI DEVI W/O SRI PRAMOD KUMAR SINHA VILL.- GANGATI, P.O.- BARA, P.S. + BLOCK - SILAO, DISTT.- NALANDA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE NALANDA 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER NALANDA 5. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL BIHAR, PATNA 6. PRAMOD KUMAR SINHA S/O LATE SUKHU MAHTO R/O MOHALLA- MOGALKUAN, P.O.- MOGALKUAN, P.S.- SOHSARAI, DISTT.- NALANDA ----------- 02. 11.11.2009 Jagdish/- Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the wife of the respondent no. 6. As per order dated 25th of July 2009 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 17742 of 2009, the respondents were directed to consider the grievance for payment of retiral dues. He further submits that while considering the case for payment of retiral dues, the grievances of the petitioner as highlighted in this writ application be also taken into consideration for which the petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 4 within a period of one week. In case such representation is filed, respondent no. 4 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner in accordance with law provided the matter for payment of retiral dues of the husband of the petitioner i.e. respondent no. 6 is not already paid. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)