LPA No.188/2007. 21.04.2008 Present: Mr H.S.Rawat, Advocate for the appellants. Mr R.P.Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1. LPA No.188 of 2007: Learned counsel for the appellants has challenged the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge, wherein the judgment of the Labour Court has been set aside. Aggrieved by the same, the employer has approached this Court and has urged only one ground that the learned Single Judge has considered the plea of violation of Rule 29-A of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 whereas this plea was never taken by the writ petitioner (workman) before the Labour Court. The learned appearing for the respondent No.1 submits that this plea was taken and Labour Court has dealt with the same which is evident from the perusal of Paragraph-9 of the judgment of the Labour Court. It belies the stand of the appellants before us. We find force in the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge wherein the matter has been heard and decided in detail by a speaking order. We are in agreement with the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge. In the light of above, no interference is warranted in the appeal and the same is dismissed. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. April 21, 2008. ( Kuldip Singh ), J. (H/s)