CRLMB7139/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.7139/2010 Vijay @ Pappu Gurjar Vs. The State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor Date of Order ::: 28.07.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Sanjay Gangwar, Counsel for petitioner Smt. Alka Bhatnagar, Public Prosecutor #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available to me during the arguments of the case. Contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case registered under Section 143/382 IPC. Co-accused Ajay Kumar has already been enlarged on bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide its order dated 09.07.2010 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.6319/2010. The case of the petitioner stands on better footings than that of co-accused Ajay Kumar, who has been named in the FIR whereas present petitioner has not been named therein. The basic dispute was in between Ajay Kumar and Khem Chand. Investigation is almost complete; there is no previous case against the petitioner. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, I deem it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner, namely, Vijay @ Pappu Gurjar Son of Ram Narayan CRLMB7139/2010 // 2 // Gurjar on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., in FIR No.445/2010, Police Station Sanganer, Jaipur City (East), under Section 143/382 IPC, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sureties of Rs.15000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The bail application stands disposed of. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//