IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.35531 of 2009 ***** 1. GREN MEHTA @ GIREN MEHTA S/O GOPICHANDRA MEHTA VILL.- BAKHRI, P.S.- SOUR BAZAR, DISTT.- SAHARSA …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR …. …. Opposite party ----------- 2. 5.11.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The origin of the present case is the Complaint Case No.1387C of 2008, which was instituted under Section 498A, 323, 406 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The contention of the petitioner is that due to certain differences and on instigation a complaint case came to be filed on totally false and frivolous ground and petitioner has been taken into custody thereafter. There are some reflections to show that the parties are willing to sort out their differences. On that ground petitioner may be enlarged on bail. In view of the above submission, let the petitioner, namely, Gren Mehta @ Giren Mehta, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties in the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Complaint Case No.1387 C of 2008. One of the sureties will be executed by a close blood relation on due identification. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)