1 wp3276.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Writ Petition No. 3276 of 2010 Rasiklal Vershi Savla ..Petitioner v/s. State Bank of India & ors. ..Respondents Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar with Ms. Sapna Rachure i/b. Sunil Kadam- advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Prakash Punjabi – advocate for respondent no.1. Dr. F.R. Shaikh – APP for the State. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ DATED :- NOVEMBER 24, 2010. P.C. The learned counsel for respondent no.1 – Bank states that they have already taken measures in respect of disputed property. 2. In view of the same, the learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners would like to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal since, according to the Bank, they have already taken measures by 2 wp3276.10.sxw issuing notice for taking possession, though actual possession as such of the property has not been taken. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the Petition with liberty to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal in accordance with law. 4 In view of this, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal. 5 The learned counsel for respondent no.1Bank states that for a period of two weeks from today, the Bank will not take any further steps and will maintain statusquo prevailing as of today. The Bank will act accordingly. 6 The learned counsel for respondent no.1Bank undertakes to file vakalatnama within a period of two days from today. Undertaking accepted. (A.P.BHANGALE, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)