IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2009 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 10124 of 2009(I) -------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- K.MUKUNDAN, S/O.CHATHUKUTTY, AGED 57 YEARS, PENSIONER, JIJITHA HOUSE, MANANTHERI P.O., CHITTARIPARAMBA (VIA), THALASSERI TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.PAVITHRAN SRI.JAYANANDAN MADAYI PUTHIYAVEETTIL RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHASILDAR, K.S.F.E.LTD., KALLAI ROAD, KOZHIKODE-673002. 2. CHAIRMAN, KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD., ROUND SOUTH THRISSUR P.O., THRISSUR. 3. P.R.SAHASRANAMAN, SENIOR LECTURER, DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH, GOVERNMENT COLLEGE, MANANTHAVADI. 4. C.K.SANKARAN, AGRICULTURAL ASSISTANT MANANTHAVADI KRISHI BHAVAN, MANANTHAVADI P.O. 5. P.N.ARJUNAN, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT GOVT.H.S.S.MANANTHAVADI, P.O.MANANTHAVADI. ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN, SC, K.S.F.E., LTD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- W.P.C. NO. 10124 OF 2009 I -------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th April, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner is a surety in respect of two transactions of two different Branches. Complaint of the petitioner is that the petitioner alone is proceeded against. Of course, petitioner raises this complaint on the basis of Ext.P2. 2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent KSFE Ltd. Learned counsel for the respondent points out that the petitioner is a surety in respect of two transactions, that the amount due as of now is Rs.95,000/= and interest from 14.7.2006. He further submits that the averment in the Writ Petition that the petitioner alone is being proceeded against, is not correct and steps have been taken against the other sureties also and the amounts are being realised. Then the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a Statement may be given to the petitioner as requested in Ext.P3. Learned counsel for the respondent WPC.10124/09 I 2 submits that a Statement will indeed be given to the petitioner showing the remittances made and the exact amount remaining to be paid. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to serve a Statement on the petitioner showing the exact amounts due under the two transactions in which the petitioner has stood surety and the remittances made by the petitioner also. This will be done within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this Judgment. Sd/= K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge