IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP Nos. 7043 & 7178 of 2011 Decided on: September 6, 2011. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CWP No. 7043 of 2011 Neena Kumari ….Petitioner vs. State of H.P. and ors. ….Respondents CWP No. 7178 of 2011 Bandna Saul ….Petitioner vs. State of H.P. and ors. ….Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge For the petitioner(s): M/s. A. K. Dhiman & Pushpinder S. Jaswal,, Advocates For the Respondents: Mr. R. K, Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG, with Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy.A.G. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petitions are filed with the following prayers:- CWP No. 7043 of 2011 “I. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order, direction directing the respondent to pay the salary for the vacation period to the petitioner from (sic.) to till date for which the petitioner is entitled for.” CWP No. 7178 of 2011 I. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order, direction directing the respondent to pay the salary for the vacation period to the petitioner for which the persons appointed under the para teacher policy basis have been held entitled from June, 2004 to till today and also the other consequential benefits which are given to other similar situated persons by the respondent..” 2. The petitioners were appointed as Para Teachers. It is submitted that the issue is squarely covered in favour of the petitioners by the decision of this Court rendered in CWP No. 2880 of 2010 dated 21.10.2010 titled as Dhananjay Saini vs. State of H.P. If that be so, similar treatment shall also be extended to the petitioners herein also, as extended to the petitioner in the above decision, in case the petitioners are also similarly situated, within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment and the copy of the judgment, referred to above, by the petitioner. 3. With the above observations, the writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice (Justice Sanjay Karol) Judge September 06, 2011 (rana/priti)