1 W.P.No.4828/11 UNREPORTED IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.4828 OF 2011. Abhimanyu S/o Arjun Patil, Age 47 years, Occ.presently Nil, resident of 10, Zilla Parishad Colony, Jalgaon, Dist.Jalgaon. ... Petitioner. Versus 1. M/s Pagariya Auto Centre, through its Proprietor Pokhraj S/o Deepchand Pagariya, Age 67 years, Occ.Business, R/o Nehru Chowk, Station Road, Jalgaon, District Jalgaon. Copy of notice also to be served upon the following address : Pokhraj S/o Deepchand Pagariya, Proprietor M/s Pagariya Auto Centre, Jalna Road, Aurangabad, Dist. Aurangabad. ... Respondent. ... Mr.K.C.Sant, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.T.K.Prabhakaran, advocate for the Respondent. ... 2 W.P.No.4828/11 CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J. Date : 20.09.2011. ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. Heard. 2. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing. 3. The petitioner was terminated/abandoned from service. The said proceedings were allowed by the Labour Court. Against which the present Respondent had filed the Writ Petition and the same is pending. The said Writ Petition is admitted and following interim order is passed: "Interim stay to the impugned judgments and orders in so far as payment of back wages is concerned on condition that the respondent/employee is permitted to join services within a period of two weeks from today." 3 W.P.No.4828/11 It was the contention of the petitioner that as the Respondent did not comply with the order, the interim order stood vacated and as such proceedings U/s 50 of the MRTU and PULP Act, were initiated. The present Respondent disputes the statement that Respondent did not comply with the condition of the interim order. The present Respondent filed an application Exh.C-27 for stay of the proceedings U/s 50 of the MRTU and PULP Act, on the ground that in the Writ Petition two Civil Applications were filed by the petitioner for the same relief and they are pending. The Labour Court, Jalgaon, allowed the said applications. Aggrieved thereby, the present petition is filed. 4. Mr.Sant, learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions of the petitioner makes a statement that the said Civil Application Nos.2761/08 and 6441/08 filed in W.P.No.7125/2007 shall not be pressed and are not pressed. The said statement is accepted as an undertaking to this Court. 4 W.P.No.4828/11 5. In view of the above, there is no impediment for the Labour Court to proceed further with Complaint (ULP) No.2/2006 on its own merits. 6. In light of the above, the Writ Petition is partly allowed. The impugned order is quashed and set aside and application Exh.C-27 in Misc.ULP No.2/2006 is rejected. The Labour Court shall decide the said ULP No.2/2006 expeditiously on its own merits. 7. Rule accordingly made absolute in above terms. No costs. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) asp/office/wp482811 5 W.P.No.4828/11