IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2853 of 2010 FATKU RAI @ KAMALA RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 7.04.2010 Heard Mr. Manish Chandra Gandhi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sonepur R.P.F. Case No.1/2009 registered under Section 3 of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in the present case because of the fact that the informant happens to be ‘Samadhi’ of one of the political rivals of the petitioner. The petitioner was a candidate for the post of Mukhiya in the election held in the year 2001. Learned counsel for the State has pointed out that petitioner is specifically named in the F.I.R. as an accused and was identified by the informant and police constable in the torch light while he was fleeing away from the place of occurrence. In that view of the matter, prayer for anticipatory bail made on behalf of the petitioner is dismissed. He must surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and may seek regular bail. If such a prayer is made, then the same may be disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. V.K. Pandey (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)