IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4917 of 2010 CHANDRIKA PRASAD @ CHUNNILAL PRASAD, S/o Late Yadolal Prasad, resident of village- Sonwa Tola Ujiyar Paharpur, District- East Champaran. ……..Petitioner. Versus 1. RAJENDRA PRASAD, S/o Gorakh Pd., resident of Village- Radhiya, P.S. Govindganj, District- East Champaran. ….Plaintiff- Opposite Party. 2. Jhausi Kunwar @ Chandrawati Kunwar, wife of Vishwanath Sah, resident of Village- Phulwaria, P.S. Sugauli, District- East Champaran. ……Defendant- opposite party. ----------- 03- 5.5.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This application has been filed by the appellant of F.A. No.292 of 2003 to restore the appeal to its original file. 2. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. By order dated 30.6.2004, passed in the appeal, certain directions were recorded which had to be complied with within a period of four weeks, failing which the appeal was to stand dismissed. The same was not complied with as a result of which the peremptory order took effect. Thereafter the appellant filed M.J.C. No.2502 of 2006, which was allowed and the time granted by the said order dated 30.6.2004, passed in the appeal, was extended. The order of this Court was once again not complied with, as a 2 result of which the appeal for the second time stood dismissed. The present application has been filed for further extension of time. It appears to us that this is a frivolous application burdening this Court with most unwanted matters, is a gross abuse of the process of the Court, and cannot be allowed. 3. This application is accordingly dismissed. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/