c^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S1 No. T0^ / 2010 PETITIONER / Smt. Suja Mary Roy W/o Shri K. M. Roy, Aged about 50 years, Occupation - Principal Govt. H. Secondary School Kumhari Distt. Durg (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ \^y^ ^^•^9--""~ ^b^y •.^^y :!" ^.'c'%^"" w ..6s 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETIT101<1ER— _Same- I-HC-22 ^ar •^WM^, ^•S\W16. Vwwy. STI^?T irara? J;.&.^2....^.0p-V/J t. ww'rr axoch f'«)<8f' an^'iqii Ri-li.'b 3TI^?I shliti ^?frB 311^1 ^IRR ^tOT SB : HON'BLB MR. JUSTICE PRlfINKER DIWAKER OS. 12.2010 Shri Vipin Tiwari, counsel for tjie petitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, P.L. for the Sta(.e. Counsel for the petitioner entitled to benefit of two advance hawing passed B.Ed. examination aft| cost. It is submitted that the issue ir| no longer res integra and the sarae Honble Supreme Court in the case of) & Ors. 2009 (III)MPJR (SC) 59. jubmits that the petitioner is Increments on account of she )er her appointment at her own jvolved in the present petition is jias been flnalty decided by the \Asba. Saxena Vs. State of&t.P. thib It is further submitted that view in its order dated 6.2.2009 pa^ Counsel for the petitioner further 29.4.2010 passed in Writ Appeal 1) upon the judgment of the Supreme (supra) and the order passed by this 87/2009, directions have been issuecj grant of two advance increments issued by the State of Madhya Prad^ pleaded in the petitidn. Counsel for the State submilt would also be considered on the sam^ In view of above, the. petition |s the respondent authorities to decid^ grant of two advance increments ^ <^1^^T •HfHdf ^ f^^ <f^l^f< '^siiigi] an^i Court has also taken a similar tsed in W.P.(S) No. 6257/2008. Isubmitg that the order dated (O. 124/2009, wherein reiying Cburt in the case of Asha Sasena Court in another Writ Appea] No. for consideration of the case for a^ per ciroular dated 21.9.1974 jsh, after verification of the facts s that case of the petitioners lines. 1 disposed of witb a direction to the claim of the petitioner for per circular dated 21.9.1974 f-Tf^ -^TWj o ^W^^^^^^^^^W^^S^S!!^n?s!S^S^-s -,. S^^^s ^ ^^ WX^ •SJLC ^S'S^h '^tT-i-Tr"-nJ '^AN^iSS^ ^t.f.-n^--- "•~U':M^-^^ ^' ^' 'i, "i^ ^.{'./ '\fS^^' •gn[ -.qiqiCTq, dTilti'l<i. r»l<nw'i< siT^yr xRrg? NIHC-IT thllch "Wl, 200 fq^sr' an^iTl h-n* sn^i ^fiitt> '^tT 311^1 ^iiwdfer issued by the State of Madhya Prad^s pleaded in the petition within a perio^ It is made clear that this Gouilt on merits of the csise and the author|ty to decide the same strictly in accorda(ice <^)'sii<r}<^rl WR^ff ^ fs^ '<.f^i^.l< ^aiPtTqan^r sh after veri&cation of the facts of eight weeks frora today. has not expressed any opinion concemed wouid be at liberty with law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge 1 '.?fA '^f7^-rl