IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 10TH AUGUST 2010 / 19TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 24948 of 2010(P) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- M/S.PONNY SILKS, T.B.ROAD, PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER C.S.HANEEFA. BY ADVS. SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR SMT.K.HYMAVATHY RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,IST CIRCLE PALAKKAD-678 001. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER(APPEALS),DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM-682 015. 3. INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES,PALAKKAD-678 001. BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= W.P.(C) No. 24948 of 2010 =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= Dated this the 10th day of August, 2010 JUDGMENT Against the assessment order for the year 2008-’09, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal along with Ext.P3 petition for stay, which are now pending consideration before the second respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is that without considering the same, Ext.P5 demand notice has been issued under section 7 of the Revenue Recovery Act, which is sought to be challenged in this writ petition. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the second respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3 petition for stay, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such orders are passed on Ext.P3 petition for stay, all further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P5 shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. mn.