IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.661 of 2009 Date of Decision:13.02.2009 Lachhman Dass ....petitioner Versus Municipal Council, Kotakpura, & anr. .....respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.Vivek Goyal,Advocate for the petitioner **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J. Counsel for the petitioner relies upon judgment of this Court dated 10.02.2009 passed in Civil Revision No.723 of 2009 titled as “Mehal Singh and another versus Municipal Council Kotakpura and another”, wherein the petitioner has been allowed to adduce additional evidence in the same and identical situation. Learned counsel has specifically stated that in fact, property in dispute in Civil Revision No.723 of 2009 and in the present revision petition are the same and the petitioner herein also wants to produce the record and clerk of the Municipal Council, Kotakpura. Relying upon the aforesaid decision of this Court, this revision is allowed in the same terms. The petitioner will have opportunity to lead his evidence in the manner as allowed in the aforesaid Civil Revision. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 13.02.2009 neenu