1 1-ao-977-1761 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 977 OF 2004 WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1424 OF 2010. Subhash A. Gandhi. ..Appellant. vs. Mew Navrang Co-operative Housing Society Limited. ..Respondent. .... Mr. Kishore Jain, with Nisha Parmar, for Appellant in both the Appeals from Order. Mr. R.M.Nakhwa, i/b. Vasant Dhawan, for Respondent, in both the Appeals from Order. .... CORAM :- SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATE :- 22ND JUNE, 2012. P.C. These two appeals have been placed on board for directions in view of the request dated 13th April 2012 made by the trial court for extension of time. While disposing off the above appeals from order, hearing of the suit was expedited by this court making the same time bound. Both the counsel state that one of the issues raised in the suit, relates to the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Bombay City Civil Court to entertain and try the suit. The parties have already led evidence on the issue and also advanced arguments thereon. It is now pending for orders. 2. Mr. Jain, the learned counsel for the appellant in both the appeals, who is the original plaintiff states on instructions from the jmi 1/2 2 1-ao-977-1761 appellant/plaintiff who is present in court that the appellant now concedes that the Bombay City Civil Court does not have pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain and try the suit and requests for return of the plaint for presentation to the proper court. 3. In view of the statement made by Mr. Jain, the plaint is returned to the appellant for presentation to the proper court. Mr. Jain states that he will accept return of the plaint and present the same to the proper court, within a period of four weeks from today. 4. The trial court to act on the authenticated copy of this order. ( SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. ) jmi 2/2