IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN TUESDAY, THE 2ND MARCH 2010 / 11TH PHALGUNA 1931 Tr.P(C).No. 256 of 2009 --------------------------------- [O.P.NO.1001/2009 OF ADDL.FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD] .................... PETITIONER: ------------------- RAJAVALLY, AGED 35 YEARS, D/O.SAROJINI, NELLIKUNATHU HOUSE, KURICHMUTTOM P.O., EDYARANMULA, KIDAGANOOR VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.AJITH MURALI. RESPONDENT: ---------------------- SURESH S.N., RAJ, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.NADARAJAN, S.S.NIVAS, SIVAGIRI MURI, VARKALA P.O., NEAR CHERKUNNAM MOSQUE, VARKALA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.J.S.AJITHKUMAR. THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. P. BHAVADASAN, J. =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= T.P.C. No. 256 of 2009 =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= Dated this the 2nd day of March, 2010 O R D E R In this petition filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure petitioner seeks to have O.P. No.1001 of 2009 pending before the Family Court, Nedumangad transferred to the Family Court, Thiruvalla. 2. The petitioner and respondent got married on 20-3-2007 at Sreedevi Vilasam N.S.S.Karayogam Auditorium, Kotta. Since difference of opinion arise between them, the petitioner left the matrimonial house. It is stated that while in the matrimonial house, the respondent is not willing to take care of her. It is further stated that the respondent approached the Family Court, Nedumangad by filing O.P. No.1001 of 2009 under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner contends that she finds it extremely difficult to go to Nedumangad to attend the court. Admittedly, the Family Court, Thiruvalla TPC 256/09 2 has jurisdiction to try the matter. She therefore points that the matter may be transferred to the Family Court, Thiruvalla. 3. Notice was served on the respondent. None appears for him. 4. It is unnecessary to go into the various other matters, as they are irrelevant for the present purpose. Considering the plight of the petitioner and in convenience caused to her, as stated by her, it is only just and proper that relief be granted to the petitioner. 5. In the result, this petition is allowed and O.P. No.1001 of 2009 pending before the Family Court, Nedumangad is transferred to the Family Court, Thiruvalla. P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE. mn.