IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2009 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 7053 of 2009(B) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ABRAHAM JOHN, S/O.JOHN, AGED 58 YEARS, AIRIKKAL HOUSE, MANAKKAKADAVU, KUMARAPURAM P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KAKKANADU, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE REVENUE DEVISIONAL OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KUNNATHUNADU VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No.7053 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 4th day of March, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner claims ownership over certain extent of property by succession. He filed Exts.P3 and P4 before the 4th respondent for mutation in his favour. Orders have not been passed on Exts.P3 and P4 and therefore the writ petition is filed. Taking into account the pendency of Exts.P3 and P4 before the 4th respondent, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the 4th respondent shall consider and pass orders on Exts.P3 and P4, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/