IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 27th day of March, 2010 Ist Bail Application No. 194 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Furkan .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No. 171/2009, U/s 394/411 IPC, PS Bhagwanpur, Roorkee District Haridwar. _______________________________________________________________ March 27, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Heard. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant submitted that the applicant is not named in the FIR and even the registration number of the motorcycle alleged to be looted on 8.8.2009 from the complainant by some unknown persons has neither been mentioned in the FIR nor in the recovery memo. He further submitted that the applicant has been implicated only on the basis of doubt and there is no direct evidence against him. He also submitted that the applicant is in jail since 8.10.2009 and trial is yet to begin. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Furkan be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 27.3.2010 PRABODH 2