IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M.No.13443-CI of 2010 in RFA No.5378 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:21.102011 Nar Singh and another ....Appellants Versus The State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Amandeep Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. * * * RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL) C.M.No.16184-CI of 2011 C.M. is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Reply filed on behalf of State is taken on record. C.M.No.13443-CI of 2010 in RFA No.5378 of 2010 This is claimants' appeal challenging the impugned award of the Reference Court on the ground that the market value of the land has been assessed at a lower rate. There is a delay of 442 days in filing this appeal. At the time of hearing, it has been brought to the notice of this Court that this appeal is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 10.11.2010 passed in RFA No.5357 of 2008 titled as Madan Lal Vs. State of Haryana and is to be dismissed in view of the said judgment. C.M.No.13443-CI of 2010 in RFA No.5378 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Learned State counsel appearing on behalf of respondents has not disputed the aforesaid fact. In view of the stand taken by the parties, this appeal is dismissed having no merit and being covered by the aforesaid judgment. Since this appeal has been decided on merits, the question of condonation of delay does not survive. October 21, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) savita JUDGE