THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4931 & 4932 OF 2007 DATED: 28.03.2011 C.R.P.No.4931 of 2007: Between: M/s United India Insurance Co.Ltd., Rep.by its Branch Manager, Sangareddy town, Medak District. .... PETITIONER And Bantu Prabhakar & 3 others. .... RESPONDENTS C.R.P.No.4932 of 2007: Between: M/s United India Insurance Co.Ltd., Rep.by its Branch Manager, Sangareddy town, Medak District. .... PETITIONER And Bantu Prabhakar & 3 others. .... RESPONDENTS COMMON ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the respondents. Perused the record. 2. It is not disputed that these two Civil Revision Petitions and M.A.C.M.A.No.5 of 2008 arose from the same accident and all the petitions i.e. O.P.Nos.461; 462 and 464 of 2004 are allowed by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Medak at Sangareddy awarding compensation in favour of the respondents- claimants. As the amount awarded in O.P.Nos.461 of 2004 and 464 of 2004 is of Rs.10,000/-, they are assailed by way of the present Civil Revision Petitions. Against the order, dated 08.06.2007, in O.P.No.462 of 2004, the insurer filed M.A.C.M.A.No.5 of 2008. It is also not disputed that the grounds urged in the said appeal and the present petitions are one and the same. By order, dated 05.02.2008, this Court dismissed M.A.C.M.A.No.5 of 2008 confirming the award passed by the Tribunal. Since the present Civil Revision Petitions also arise out of the same accident and the grounds urged in the present Civil Revision Petitions are the same as those in M.A.C.M.A.No.5 of 2008, the present Civil Revision Petitions are also dismissed for the same reasons mentioned in the order, dated 05.02.2008, in M.A.C.M.A.No.5 of 2008. 3. Accordingly, both the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed and the awards passed by the Tribunal are confirmed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 28th March, 2011. Tsy