<3'e': HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8QARH AT BILASPUR SB : HOH»BLE.SHRI JUSTICE PmTINKER DIWAKER ti II '?^' W.P. m N0. 2606/2009 PETITIONBR RBSPONDENTS ¥crBU3 1. 2. 3. 4. Smt. Savita Siaha, Wtfe of Shri Saojay Kum.ar Sinha, aged about 36 years/ Assistant Teachcr, r/o,, SeAgam Chowk, Dai'bari Toli^ Jashpur 'Nagar, Tahsil aad Dist. Jashpur (CG) State ' . of Chliattisgarh, TSirough SecrctaTy, Txibal. Welfare ^ Development Departoient, ' D,K,S,Bhawa2i, Raipur(CG) (^om.iiiissioner, Aadivasi Vikas, Raipur (CG) CoUector fl'ribal Welfare Braiich) 'JasIipur ' District Jashpur (CG) Assistant CoiHBiissioner, Aadivasi Vikas^ Jaslipur (CG) WRIT PSTITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226 OF.THB C^?i8T2TUTIOS? OF IIWDIA : • . A^pea?a2£ce: Shri Maaoj Kuiiiar Siaha., comisel for fh.e petitioner. SIiri Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel Lawycr for.the State, ORAL;ORDER •(15.05.2009) • With consent of the learaed cousisei appearmg fbr the parties,.the matter'is hearcl fmally. . Leam.e.d couasel appearmg for .th.e.:petitioner subimts that the petitioner was appoiiited as Assistant Teacher 011 10.4.95 (Annexiire P/ 1) on a fixed pay scale of Rs. 12QO/- 'for a period of t^o .years, Afler .com.pletton .of twro years ^ porobation, the petition was graiited regular pay scale. He further subinits that tlie issue io.volved iii the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to rcgular pay scale with effect froni tlie date of iiiitial appointoient or after coiapletioii ofprobation period. The issue iavolved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Admiaistrative TribunaJ. Jabalpur iii O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhiikaat Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M,P, & Others), whereixr it was held. tliat fhe siiuilarly situated teachers -are entitled to regular pay scale w,e.f the date ofioitial appoiatinent The nxatterwas taken up to the Hon'ble Suprenie Court. The appeal was dism.issed b}7 the Hon'ble Suprenie Court, upholdiiig the decisioa •of the Tribuiial to the effect tbM. the Teachers/Assistent Teachers are entitied to regular pay scale from. fhe date of iiiitial appom.tment. lu view of the a.bove stated submissions made by learaed coiinsel for fhe parties, the writ petition is disposed ofia the same terois Le., the petitioner is granted Mberty to niake a representation, if so advised^ to consider the petitioner's case, if he staixds cn tiie same footiiigs as per order dated 24.8.1992 by tlie Madhya Pradesh State Admmistrate Tribunal, Jabalpur m O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukaiit Yadu (Supra) aiid subsequenfly confirmed by order dated 3.1.1994 passed by fhe Houl^le Suprenie Court ia Special Leave petition (Civil) No, 6892/93 aiid graiit relief accordmgly. - In view of fhe foregoiag, tlie petition staiids disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge ^^