^ ,'' .5c , yd0 s^"^^^ dated.-"":' SiNSLE BEl IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition N0. ^P^_ /2006 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Service matter •^ A.R. Thakur aged about^:.? years S/0. kfmf-tl Thci^ti^ R/o. Qtr.No.A-l/63 Irrigation Colony, Rampur Tahsil and Distt. Korba (C.G.) VERSUS 4. Sta.te of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Water Resources Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^2. Sub-Divisional Officer (R ) Korba, District Korba.(C.G.) 3. Executive Engineer Minimata Bango Nagar Sambhag Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ^4. Krishna Kumar Agrawal S/o. Unknown, profession- businessman, R/o. Qtr.No.A/l, Irrigation Colony, Rampur, Tahsil and Dis.trict Korba (C.G.) WRITJ'ETITLON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF / '» CONSTITUTION OF INDIA r 1. PARTICULARS OF-THE PETITIONER As per the cause title above. ^ifensgi iE.«.^. ^ 1R\ ^. ;-?? ^^^—^ l?'o 'Ts'f^y ^ ^ <L, XI-HC-78 T=r •<<i<<ici'ii, aiTnyie, Ridiyy<. :(TT(T^n'gnTRR"'^J^-t>^'-i<vl'(^-S-^ 200 ^> 3T[^?Tira^T (l^fg^ST) 3n^?TWR-1 TOT3IT^Tsh*11'=h \- ?T3TW: ^fsa'sn^r hbs 11.8.2006:- Shri Gautam Khetrapal, coun^ Shri Satish Gupta, Depu|t respondents No.1 and 2, on advanc^ HearcJ both the counsei. By theinstant petition, the 27-6-2006 whereby the petitioner Irrigation Department which is in his| The allegation against the p^ quarter of the Irrigation Departm|s petitioner has been transferred from | A limted prayer has beer1 petjtioner that as the petitioner is arrangement at Jaijaipur, therefor^, quarter within a period of 2 months f|- Looking to the limited petitioner and having considered th|e the petitioner may be allowed to 2006 provided he fumishes an unc|« vacate the quarter on or before 11^ vacate the quarter within the pray|er may be initiated against the petition^i In view of the above, the petitjon Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.2|; Parties are entitled for certifietl »bl'i|Tcl41-fWRTt' ff fel^l' <(a|+ril< ^Brf^Tsn^r el for the petitioner. y Govt. Advocate for the State/ copy. pe|titioner has challenged the order dated been asked to vacate the quarter of Ipossession. ^titioner is that he is not vacating the i|snt even after his transfer, as the i|KorbatoJaijaipur.^ -^-<'^w-?-^» made by learned counsel for the r^quired to take some time for making ^, he may be altowed to vacate the 1-om today. ay|er made by learned counsel for the i|e facts and cireumstances of the case, ^acate the quarter by 11 September jertaldng before the'S.D.O. that he wli September 2006. In case, he faiis to stipi|lated period, then disciplinary action stands disposed of. 238/2006 also stands disposed of. copyofthisorder. L.C. Judge ^ y. '•-l P.T.O.