1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO.927 OF 2009 Balasaheb S/o Wamanrao Punjare ... Appellant. Versus Gangadhar S/o Eknath Joshi And Another. ... Respondents. -------- Shri. V.M. Maney, Advocate for the appellant. -------- CORAM: R.M. BORDE, J. DATE: 7th JANUARY 2010 PER COURT : 1) Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2) It is informed by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant / original defendant that the appeals involving similar questions wherein the appellant / original defendant was a party being Second Appeal Nos. 589/2009, 593/2009, 594/2009 were dismissed 2 summarily by this Court on 8-9-2009. The question raised in those matters was also in respect of commission of encroachment by the defendant/appellant over the land belonging to the respective plaintiffs. The evidence placed on record by the party in all the matters is also identical. 3) Considering the decision rendered in the appeals referred to above, the instant appeal also does not need to be considered. On perusal of the orders passed by the Court I am of the opinion that the arguments advanced by the appellant and the points raised are regarding appreciation of the evidence. No substantial question of law is involved in the instant appeal. 4) The appeal, therefore, stands dismissed summarily. (R.M. BORDE, J.) rsl/ sa.927.09