( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 485 OF 2009 Prafulla s/o Ajayrao Patil and another. PETITIONERS VERSUS Kashinath s/o Hari Patil and another. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. C.V. Thombre, advocate for the petitioners. Mr. V.B. Patil, advocate for respondent No. 1. Mrs. Y.M. Kshirsagar, APP for respondent No.2 ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 30th September, 2009] PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The petition is filed for quashing of the order whereby the process has been issued against the petitioners in a private complaint case for offence punishable under section 500 read with section 34 of the I.P. Code. ( 2 ) 3. Alternate remedy is available by way of revision application. Therefore, in view of “Sakiri Vasu v. State of Uttar Pradesh and others” (2008) 2 SCC 409, ordinarily, the writ petition may not be encouraged. Consequently, the petition is dismissed and the petitioners are relegated to alternate remedy. 4. At request of Mr. Thombre, the ad-interim relief is continued for period of three (3) weeks. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/criwp485-09