IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4663/2006 Vithal Bandu Shitole Petitioner Vs. General Manger and Anr. Respondent Mr.Kranti Hiwrale i/b P.G.Lad advocate for the petitioner Rutuja Ambekar with N.V.Masurkar with V.S.Masurkar Coram : A.M.Khanwilkar,J. Date : 11th July,2008 P.C. Heard counsel for the parties. I see no reason to depart from the conclusion of the Court below in rejecting the appeal preferred by the petitioner. The court below has considered all the aspects of the matter including the grievance that there was no evidence forthcoming to substantiate the petitioners case that the petitioner was in fact in possession of the disputed premises even prior to June,1998 when the inspection was undertaken by the authorities wherein it was noticed that the third party was present in the premises. The documents 2 which pertain to period anterior to June,1998 have been taken in to account by the lower court. The finding of fact recorded by the lower court is on the basis of cogent material which does not substantiate the defence of the petitioner that he was in possession of the disputed premises even prior to June,1998 . No case for interference . Dismissed. (A.M.Khanwilkar,J)