Crl. Revn. No. 3334 of 2009 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revn. No. 3334 of 2009 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 09.2.2010 Dilbagh Singh @ Bagga ..........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..........Respondent BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate for the petitioner. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. The petitioner has filed the present revision petition against the order dated 9.11.2009 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc), Fast Track, Amritsar, vide which charge under Sections 363,366 and 376 IPC has been framed against him. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has wrongly been implicated in the present case. He further contends that as per MLR no injury was found on the person of the prosecutrix and she was not subjected to intercourse during the alleged period of kidnapping. He also contends at the most petitioner can be charged under Section 363 IPC and not under Section 376 IPC. In support of his contention, learned counsel also relied upon the judgment of this Court in Sugar & Others Vs. State of Haryana 2009 (5) RCR (Criminal) 484. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have also gone through the impugned order. Crl. Revn. No. 3334 of 2009 (O&M) (2) As there are serious allegations against the petitioner, I am not inclined to entertain this petition. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise all the points raised in this petition before the trial Court. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. February 09, 2010 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE Note:-Whether this case is to be referred to the Reporter .......Yes/No