PETITIONER ^ ^°t^ ^y <$; •sf ^ ^ 10-0 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR (CG} WRIT PETITION (S) N0., <S >^3> /2007 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIQ^N OF INDIA, S.R. Nirala (B.Ed.), aged about 47 years, son of Lallu Ram Nirala, Upper Division Teacher, Presently Head Master, Government Tribal Boys Middle School - Sanna, Tah. Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (CG) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Deptt of Tribal Welfare, Jashpur (CG) Block Education Officer Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (CG) RESPQNDENTS ^-1 1 1QD XI-HC-78 sn^rwfew cT^n'STT^T^ic^ Bablu 3^'HfPTRra', ^Tnti'lti, Rdiyy I^.P.U)^0. £2.3 *ll*TcTTsh*liqi•••••••••'••••••••••.•^r 2Q07 3TRSr'ra^7 (l?rf3^^) TOnwHfer.a.n^r wfepfrr wraf¥fec^ (R|%K ^aif^irsn^r 1.2.2007 Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Maz^ffldar, counsel for/"rfie petitioners. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel f^yer for the respondentS/State. With the consent of leajrned counsel for the parties, the matters are heard fina!!y and dispoad of. Common order dictate^ in W.P, (s) No. 621 of 2007 in open Court-, separateEy. ^ copy of this piaced on record in connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge P.T.O. HI6H COURT OF CHH/tTTTSfeSRH^AF BIUSPU8 SIN61E BENCH ; HON'BLE MR. S^TISH K. A6NWOTRI. J. WRTT PETn~roN(s) NO. 621 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Responctents Chintamani Tiwari Stateof Chhatt-isgarh cnd others WRTT PETmON ts) NQ^^ZOF 2QQ7 Petitioner Resoondents versus famari Kamfa Kerketta State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PETmON (s) N0^6210^2007 Petitioner versus Resoondents 5.R. Nirala 5tate of Chhattisgarh and others And WRir PETTTrON (s) |SLQ_624^F 2007 Petjtioner versus Resoondents Nagesh Kumar Rathia State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mazumdar, counsel for the petitioners. Ms. 5unita Jajn, Panel tawyer for the STate/ reqsondenrs, OR D E R (Passed on Ihis Ist February. 2007} 1. Leamed counsel cppear'mg for the petitioners as well as leamed . f'" Penal lawyer appearing for the respondents/Stat®jointly .submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ peti+ion are squarely covered by the decision of this Court- in the case of yasfweHvt Kumar Bhafwdwaj vs. Mwricipal Corpwatim. Ouny tmd aiwthw>'. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of tiie decision of this Court in the matter of yashwanf Kumar BhafvdwaJ(5u^ra}, subject to verification of the fact asto whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T.I. Certificates at •riieir own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further wrfiether tiiey have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be ptacecl on re.cord m connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatisbK.Agmhotri Judge 1 2006CtI)MPJR-C696 Bablu