1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.01.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH W.A.(MD)No.7 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 A.Muthupandi ... Appellant/Petitioner Vs. The Chairman, The Tamil Nadu Uniform Services Recruitment Board, Annasalai, Chennai. ... Respondent/Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(MD)No.13732 of 2010 dated 18.11.2010 presented to this Court Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to provide 66 marks instead of 63 marks to the petitioner, by persuing the video regarding recorded at the time of long sump physical test relating to the petitioner dated 18.08.2010 consequently directing the respondent to appoint the petitioner as Sub Inspector, with all service benefits as per with other candidates appointed in Sub Inspector recruitment for the year 2010. For Appellant : Mr.R.Venkatesan For Respondent : Mr.R.Janakiramulu, Spl.G.P. JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR,J.) The Writ Appeal is filed against the order in W.P.(MD)No.13732 of 2010 dated 18.11.2010 dismissing the Writ petition filed by the appellant praying for a mandamus directing the respondent to provide 66 marks instead of 63 marks to the petitioner by perusing the video recordings recorded at the time of long jump physical test relating to the petitioner dated 18.08.2010 and consequently directing the respondent to appoint the petitioner as Sub Inspector with all service benefits. 2.It is not in dispute that at the first instance, the appellant’s long jump was declared as foul and he was directed to take part in second attempt and he jumped only 4.40 mtrs. The same is not disputed by the appellant. As per the norms, if a candidate covers 4.5 mtrs., two stars would be provided and if the candidate covers 3.80 mtrs. one star will be provided. The appellant having jumped only 4.40 mtrs. in the second attempt and the marks awarded by the respondent as one star is just and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 proper. The learned Single Judge considered the said aspect and dismissed the Writ petition. We find no merits in the Writ appeal to interfere with the said finding of the learned Single Judge. The Writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P.is closed. Sd/- Deputy Registrar /True copy/ Assistant Registrar To The Chairman, The Tamil Nadu Uniform Services Recruitment Board, Annasalai, Chennai. nbj SR : 22.01.2011 : 2p/2c W.A.(MD)No.7 of 2011 05.01.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/