IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.278 of 2008 SHAIL GIRI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 6 14.1.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. Reference may be made to the earlier order of this Court dated 12.11.2008 which would speak for itself. Today, the counsel appearing on behalf of Raj Kumar Goswami (Opposite Party No.2) would submit that all the prosecutions lodged by him (Raj Kumar Goswami) have been withdrawn and not a single case is now pending. Counsel for the petitioner however would submit that though order-sheet has been enclosed with regard to the withdrawal of all other criminal cases but for one case pertaining to Complaint Case No. 3094(C) of 2006 no such order has been produced. Counsel for the petitioner however assures this Court that the statement made in the application of Raj Kumar Goswami on affidavit that even this case has been withdrawn must be accepted and therefore, mere absence of order-sheet could not be taken to non-compliance of the earlier order. That being so, this Court would find that no useful purpose will be served by keeping this application of contempt pending. In view of the fact that the terms 2 and conditions set out by this Court in the earlier order has been fully complied by both the parties, let the records of this case be consigned. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)