@ g‘ 0/2“ (‘”31", wag mm 5/ V IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT M BILASPUR [C.G) w.P. (S) No. ((7715 K OF 2011 ; / Smt. Rashmi Gupta W/o Shri Bhagwat, Gupta, aged about 35 w years, Shiksha Karmi Varg-1, Government High School Malhar, Block Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS :1. / State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, D.~K.S.Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) ' 2. " The Director, Public Instructions, M Directorate Raipur (C.G.) —— /The Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. " District Education Officer, Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. / Block Education Officer, Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE l f , , W g . HIGH COURT OF CHHATI‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 175 of2011 PETITIONER : Smt. Rashmi Gupta. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri K.S.Pawar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, G.A for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 13 day of January, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that pursuant to 5 the invitation of objection hem all the candidates, the petitioner has made a representation for correction in his answer sheet by representation dated 29.11.2010 (Annexure P/9). Till date, no action has been taken on his representation in either way. 2. Be that as it may, law is well settled that if a representation is made, the same should be decided Within a period of three to six months. Having regard to the facts situation of the case wherein the objection has been invited, it is incumbent upon the respondent authorities to consider and decide the representation ofthe petitioner, before passing final order and the same ought to have been done at the earliest. 3. Accordingly, it is directed that the objection/representation of the petitioner, as aforestated, may be considered and decided in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period ofthree weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy ofthis order. 4. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/—' Satish K. Agnihotri Judge