IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.9423 of 2010 Date of Decision. 04.07.2011 K.C. Gupta son of Shri Gurdial Mal, H.No.49, Tribune Mitter Vihar, near Ramgarh, Opp-Sector 26, Panchkula ......Petitioner Versus Union of India through Secretary to Department of Telephones, Sanchar Bhawan, 20, Ashoka Road, New Delhi and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. H.C. Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D.K. Singhal, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the award has been passed and the case has become infructuous. The statement of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 04, 2011 Pankaj*