1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2757 OF 2007. PETITION NO. 2757 OF 2007. PETITION NO. 2757 OF 2007. Shri Arif Tajjuddin Mulla and another : Petitioners versus Dargah of Peer Sayyed Hisamuddin Kattale Zanjjani Chisti Rahemtulla Alley (Thorala Shaikh Salla Dargah) and ors. : Respondents. Mr.S.M.Ghorwardkar i/by Mr.P.G.Chavan for the petitioners. Mr.Y.H.Muchhala, Sr.Advocate, with Ms.Harsa I Advani, Mr.Farroq A. Choudhary, Mr.Javed Patel i/by Mr.Sagheer A. Kah for Respondent No.1. Mr.G.s.Godbole for Respondent No.6. Ms.Rupali Pawar for Respondent No.13. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, AGP, for State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.B.MHASE & S.S.SHINDE, JJ. : S.B.MHASE & S.S.SHINDE, JJ. : S.B.MHASE & S.S.SHINDE, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : APRIL 15, 2008. : APRIL 15, 2008. : APRIL 15, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. We have perused the petition, more specifically, the prayer clauses. The prayer clauses 2 of this petition cannot be granted by way of writ petition. The alternate remedies are available either under the Bombay Public Trust Act and/or Wokf Act viz. if the property involved in this petition is a trust property, they can approach to the Trust and, if the property involved in this petition is a wokf property, they can approach to the Wokf. But one thing is clear that the alternate remedy either under the Bombay Public Trust Act and/or Wokf Act is available to the petitioners. Therefore, we refrain to entertain this petition. The petition is dismissed accordingly. Our observations about the alternate remedy does not create any right in favour of the petitioners to file the matter. They should establish their locus independently when they follow the alternate efficacious remedy. [S.S.SHINDE, [S.S.SHINDE, [S.S.SHINDE, J] [S.B.MHASE, J] J] [S.B.MHASE, J] J] [S.B.MHASE, J]