IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2010 / 3RD ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 19674 of 2010(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- S.SURESH KUMAR, EMPANELLED DRIVER, KSRTC VIKAS BHAVAN UNIT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, VARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, MUDAVOOR PARA, BALARAMAPURAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. BY ADV. SRI.L.MOHANAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, VIKAS BHAVAN UNIT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY STANDING COUNSEL FOR KSRTC SHRI V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.19674 of 2010 --------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 24th DAY OF JUNE, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner herein is an empanelled driver under the KSRTC at Vikas Bhavan Unit, Thiruvananthapuram. The Corporation had issued a notification inviting application for the post of empanelled drivers, based on which the petitioner submitted an application through the Employment Exchange and was engaged also after interview. Now the process of regularisation has been initiated to regularise services of provisional employees who have got eight years of qualifying service in the Corporation. The details of the scheme is available in Exhibit P2. According to the petitioner he has completed more than 12 years of continuous service in the Corporation on provisional basis. He has more than 120 days of duty every year except when he was on leave. But it appears that his name has been omitted to be forwarded for consideration. In these circumstances, he has filed Exhibit P3 representation before the respondent. W.P.(C)No.19674/10 -2- 2. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation. Since the representation is pending before the 1st respondent, there will be a direction to the 1st respondent to call for the records leading to the service details of the petitioner from the 2nd respondent and take appropriate decision on Exhibit P3 representation within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. dsn