THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.284, 285 and 349 of 2007 COMMON ORDER: Since these three Civil Revision Petitions are connecting to each other, they are being taken up together for disposal. Admittedly, the petitioner filed I.A.Nos.1817, 1818 and 1819 of 2005, under Order VI Rule 17 CPC read with Section 151 CPC, after the preliminary decree passed in O.S.No.171 of 1997 on the file of III Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, seeking to amend the plaint. Upon hearing the parties, the Court below has dismissed all those applications on the ground that as the question with regard to petitioner’s share in the house was already decided and preliminary decree was passed in regard thereto, the same cannot be questioned again. Hence, these Civil Revision Petitions. Heard and perused the material on record. There is no dispute that preliminary decree was passed by the Court below on 13.07.2006 in O.S.No.171 of 1997. It is no doubt well established that the Court can pass more than one preliminary decree. But, however, amendment of the plaint as sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted, as subsequent event as stated by her cannot be introduced at the time of final decree proceedings. Therefore, I do not find any justification to allow the petitioner to amend the plaint at this stage. However, it is open to the petitioner to urge the same in the final decree proceedings and the Court below can go into all the questions and decide the matter. Subject to the above, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. No costs. _______________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, ACJ 18th NOVEMBER, 2010. kvni