gjDlwLf @ % IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH! WRIT PETITION (S) NO.%’%3C> /2009. 3mg“ Bench VMx“ ETITIONER: Vijay Kumar Soni, son of Late Shn‘ Ransaj Soni, aged about 54 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, Posted at Govt.Middle School, I . Saragbundiya, District Korba, (1%\gj Chhattisgarh. V6I‘SUS espondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through, The Secretary Tribal Welfare Department Ministry D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. V 2 Commissioner, Schedule Tribe and 9 Schedule Caste Development, C‘em‘o A. L Chhattisgarh, Raipur. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Korba, District Korba, ; Chhattisgarh. 4. Block Education Officer, Block Kartala, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. \ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE N CONSTITUTION OF INDIA V " 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER S : P “ R @; HEGH COURT GF CHHKF‘E'BSGH AT BELA8PUR {Ham WW. JustEce Pritinker EEwakw} Wk‘it ?e€§tien (S) No. 333a? o? 200% @EHTEQNER Vijay KUmar Soni. VERSUS RESPGN§ENTS State of Chha‘itisg'arh and others. Shri KS. Pawar counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yaswent Singh Thakur Dy. AG for respondents/State. WRH PETI‘HON UNDER ARTECLE 226 OF THE CONSTlTUTiON OF !NDIA aRDER {13.a72909) With the consent of the counsei for the parties, the matter is heard finaiiy. By way of this petition the petitioner is seeking regular pay scaie on the post of Assistant Teacher. Counsei for the’petitioner submits that number of identica! petittone have been decided by this Court and the issueinvotved is a concluded one. He has aiso referred to one 0t the orders in WP. (S) No. 813/2007 (Ram Kumar Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh) in which teguiar pay scale was granted from the date of initial appointment. Counsel for the respondents/State submits that in the light of the judgment of this Court the petitioner may make a representation to the authorities concerned and the same wouid be decided after scrutinizing the factual and legal position. Thus it is directed that if the petitioner makes a representation to the authorities concerned within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same shail be decided within a further period of one month from the date of its receipt. Sdl- Pritinker Diwaker Judge With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of é i I $ t l