Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr.M.P.(M) No.247 of 2009 And Cr.M.P.(M) No.248 of 2009. Dated of Decision: April 20, 2009. 1. Cr.M.P.(M) No.247 of 2009. Shiv Kumar. …..… Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. ……. Respondent. 2. Cr.M.P.(M) No.248 of 2009. Rajesh Sarpal. …..… Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. ……. Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the Petitioners: Mr. Bhupinder Ahuja, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. J.S. Guleria, Asstt. Advocate General. Surinder Singh, J (oral): Report filed. Matter considered. Both the applications for pre-arrest bail are taken together for consideration as having arisen from the same FIR. The petitioners are the partners of “M/s Achleshwar Traders”, who have their head office at Dhangu-Peer, Tehsil Indora, District Kangra, H.P. Their tender for the supply of Fuji X-ray films of the size 12” X 15” was approved by the Senior 2 Medical Officer, Nurpur. Pursuant to that, the petitioners are alleged to have supplied the X-ray films, out of which in one such container had X- ray Films having the marking “supply only for the J & K Government and not for the sale”. The said container was having 24 X-ray films and two films of the said supply were taken into possession from the patients, namely Ram Piari and Hari Chand. The said supply could not have been given to the private contractors for its further supply to any other Government concerned or institute. With reference to the last order, both the petitioners have joined the investigation of this case. According to the petitioners, they purchased the container of the X-ray films from ‘M/s Sunil Enterprises’, Pathakot, an authorized dealer of Fuji Films and they had supplied it in the same sealed container to the Senior Medical Officer, Nurpur, which did not have any mark of Govt. supply of J & K, which fact has been confirmed by the Investigating Officer in the court today. Therefore, in these circumstances, the interim bail granted to them on 8.4.2009, is confirmed on the further conditions added to the previous that the petitioner shall join the investigation whenever required to do so and shall 3 not tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner. Further that they shall not cause breach of any of the conditions imposed while granting bail to them. If they do so, the liberty of bail shall be cancelled. Both the applications stand disposed of. April 20, 2009. (Surinder Singh) (Pds) Judge.