IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWPs No. 4358, 4359, 4361, 4362, 4363 & 4364 of 2011. Decided on: 30th June, 2011. 1. CWP No. 4358 of 2011. Neel Kanth. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 2. CWP No. 4359 of 2011. Janak Dev. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 3. CWP No. 4361 of 2011. Rakesh Kumar. vs. State of H.P. & others. 4. CWP No. 4362 of 2011. Satya Dev. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 5. CWP No. 4363 of 2011. Vir Bahadur. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 6. CWP No. 4364 of 2011. Balbir Singh. Vs. State of H.P. & others. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Sandeep Pandey, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim work charge status on completion of eight years of continuous service as daily waged worker. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No.2735 of 2010 titled Rakesh Kumar versus State of H.P. and others. 2. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. We are informed that the State has filed an appeal against the above mentioned decision. Therefore, it is made clear that the implementation of the judgment referred to above would depend on the outcome of the decision of the Apex Court. The needful action, after verifying the facts will be taken within a period of two months from the date of the judgment of the Apex Court. The petitioner concerned will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 3rd respondent/competent authority. 3. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 30th June, 2011. ( Justice V.K. Sharma), (tr) Judge.