IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2477 of 2006 Shiv Prakash Rai, son of Sri Nageshwar Rai, resident of Village- Sarenga, P.O. Sarenga, Police Station- Rajpur, District- Buxar. ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Commissioner-Cum- Secretary, Commercial Taxes Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Commissioner-cum- Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Commissioner –cum- Secretary, Rural Development (Koshi Yajna M.P., M.L.A. Development Fund) Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5. The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna. 6. The Accountant General, Bihar (Audit), Birchand Patel Path, Patna. 7. The District Magistrate, Buxar. 8. The District Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara 9. The District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua. 10. The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram. 11. The District Magistrate, Patna. 12. The District Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif. 13. The District Magistrate, Jehanabad. 14. The District Magistrate, Arwal. 15. The District Magistrate, Gaya. 16. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad. 17. The District Magistrate, Nawada. 18. The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai. 19. The District Magistrate, Sekhpura. 20. The District Magistrate, Munger. 21. The District Magistrate, Jamui. 22.The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur. 23.The District Magistrate, Banka. 24.The District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur. 25.The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur. 26.The District Magistrate, Sitamadhi. 27.The District Magistrate, Siwahar. 28.The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. 29.The District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah. 30. The District Magistrate, Gopalganj. 31. The District Magistrate, Siwan. 32. The District Magistrate, Saran. 33. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga. 34. The District Magistrate, Madhubani. 35. The District Magistrate, Samastipur. 2 36. The District Magistrate, Begusarai. 37. The District Magistrate, Khagaria. 38. The District Magistrate, Katihar. 39. The District Magistrate, Madhepura. 40. The District Magistrate, Saharsa. 41. The District Magistrate, Supaul. 42. The District Magistrate, Purnia. 43. The District Magistrate, Araria. 44. The District Magistrate, Kishanganj. 45. The Treasury Officer, Buxar. 46. The Treasury Officer, Bhojpur at Ara. 47. The Treasury Officer, Kaimur at Bhabhua. 48. The Treasury Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram. 49. The Treasury Officer, Patna 50.The Treasury Officer, Nalanda at Biharsharif. 51. The Treasury Officer, Jehanabad. 52. The Treasury Officer, Arwal. 53. The Treasury Officer, Gaya. 54. The Treasury Officer, Aurangabad. 55. The Treasury Officer Nawadah. 56. The Treasury Officer, Lakhisarai. 57. The Treasury Officer, Shekhpura. 58. The Treasury Officer, Munger. 59. The Treasury Officer, Jamui. 60. The Treasury Officer, Bhagalpur. 61. The Treasury Officer, Banka. 62. The Treasury Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur. 63. The Treasury Officer, Muzaffarpur. 64. The Treasury Officer, Sitamadhi. 65. The Treasury Officer, Siwahar. 66. The Treasury Officer, East Champaran at Motihari. 67. The Treasury Officer, West Champaran at Bettiah 68. The Treasury Officer, Gopalganj. 69. The Treasury Officer, Siwan. 70. The Treasury Officer, Saran. 71. The Treasury Officer, Darbhanga. 72. The Treasury Officer, Madhubani. 73. The Treasury Officer, Samastipur. 74. The Treasury Officer, Begusarai. 75. The Treasury Officer, Khagaria. 76. The Treasury Officer, Katihar. 77. The Treasury Officer, Madhepura. 78. The Treasury Officer, Saharsa. 79. The Treasury Officer, Supaul. 80. The Treasury Officer, Purnea. 81. The Treasury Officer, Araria. 82. The Treasury Officer, Kishanganj. ... Respondents. ----------- 3 04- 4.5.2009 Heard Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy for the petitioner, and Mr. Vikash Kumar, learned Assistant Counsel to Advocate General. The analogous M.J.C. No.269 of 2009 has just now been allowed, restoring the present writ petition in its file. As jointly prayed for by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken on Board for admission. 2. We are of the view that, in view of the issue raised in the present writ petition, no useful purpose will be served by calling for counter affidavit and keeping this writ petition pending in this Court. Let the cause raised in this writ petition receive the attention of the learned Advocate General who shall, in his turn, pass on the issues to the appropriate authorities for consideration and orders, this being essentially an administrative matter. 3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (S K Katriar, J.) (Kishore K. Mandal, J.) S.K.Pathak/