SINGLEBENClt IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OFCHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR APPELLANTS M. A.fQ N0 1; )F 20095 ?<fe£- ^-^^yj"'? s-.^: Kishan @ Harikishan Son of Shri Bisambher Satnami, aged about 24 years; (DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE) Kamlesh Son of Shri Bisambher Satnami; (OWNER OFTHEVEHICLE) Both are resident of Village Mohbhattha, Tahsil Berla, Police Station Saja, District Durg (C.G.). VERSUS Manohar Son of Shri Tirjan Yadav, aged about 38 yeas, Resideht of Village MoMbhattha, Tahsil Berla, Police Station Saj'a, District Durg (C.G.). (CLAIMANT) MEMO QF APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT.1988 RESPONDENT y k) APPELLANTS: HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.A.?C)No.1592 of 2008 Kishan @ Harikishan & another -Versus- RESPONDENT: Manohar -•^^ Present Shri P.P. Sahu with Shri S.P. Sahu, counse! for the appellants. None for the respondent though served. 3i/<^ // ^-f-c/ Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra. J. ORAL ORDER (21-6-2011) 1. Heard. 2. In an accident invoiving tractor and trolley bearing registration Nos. CG-04/D- 2483 and CG-04/D-2384 respectively belonging to appellant No.2 which was driven by appeilant No.1 at the relevant time, the claimant preferred claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act to ciaim compensation of Rs.1,40,000/- on submission that he received fracture of his right leg and was admitted in the Gayatri Hospital. Learned Claims Tribunal has awarded compensation of Rs.14.895/- after taking into consideration the agreement (Ex.- D/3) by which the appellants had paid Rs.15,105/- to the injured prior to the date of fiiing of claim petition. Thus, total compensation of Rs.30,000/- has been awarded. 3 The Tribunal has found that the injured sustained fracture of his leg and was incapacitated to work and may also require crutehes for considerable period and thus, in addition to the amount aiready received by the injured, an amount of Rs,14.895/- would be sufficient for menta! agony, pain and suffering and loss suffered by him. 4 Looking to the meager amount of compensation awarded to the injured, this Court is not inclined to interfere in this appeal for reducing the amount of compensation. 5 In the result, the appeai fails and is hereby dismissed. in/e Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge