^ ^cST •^l^lrt^, IPTHI<-I<I<O, Rlrtltiy *11H01 $P*1iq» aTT^^Tcmf^rtcp ^snSTT^^T^Ht^ 3TT^?T q^P (yii^qcg) ^200 ?^TT^R;<rrf^T3H^5T PETITIQNER Shri emp cbl^|fc!»^Tlv1^l+loV^ Csl<1 ^FJI^-CIK ^) 3rf^T en^^T W.P. F&1 No.6561/2008 Kimi|ni Umamaheshwara Rao, K.V.R.Murty, aged about S/o Late 43 years, |oyed as Assistant Grade-III, O/o Vs RESPONDENTS Exec|utive Engineer, Water Resources Dep^rtment, Division Dhamtari, Residing at: Yillage: A/90, M.R.P. Colony, Rudri, Disttl. Dhamtari 1. S^ate of Chhattisgarh, through : the S^cretary, Wafer Resources D^partment, D.K.S. Bhawan, M| 2, T^ D\ Li] 3. T^ D< 4. Tt R( Di mtralaya, Raipur 492001 (CG) Le Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources ^partment, Sihawa Bhawan, Civil -ies, Raipur 492 001 (CG) ie Chief Engineer, Water Resources ^partment, M.G. Basin, Raipur (CG) LC Executive Engineer, Water ^sources Department, Dhamtari vision, Dhamtari (CG) (Petition U/A 226/J227 of Constitution oflndia) (Sinele Bench; Hon^ble Mr« Jlustice Dhirendra Mishra) 25.11.2008 Shri B.P. Rao, counsel f\ Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Pane| Heard. With the consent oflearrl heard finally. )r the petitioner. Lawyer for the State. .ed counsel for the parties, the petition is ^jwT ^i^irt^, ^-al1<-i<i<»,Rrtmy *11*101 ^TT^? 3Tf^?T tRcp (yif^qcg) ^200 STT^^Tcinf^ltcp ^sn^^T^HTc?) ?^:TTSR^rf^T3TI^$T z Learned counsel for thd petitioner may be given an oj before the coinpetent authori|ty has no objection. Having considered an4 merits of the case, in the served if liberty is granted) representation raising his gri^ the respondents along with period of one raonth from the competent authority of th( own merit, in accordance wj within a period of three representation. With the aforesaid tod^.y chl^fc!>41T1 +ll+lc^T^BfecSt<<Fjl^'ci<< ^3ri^T3TT^9T petitioner submits that for the present the )portunity of filing detailed representation r, to which learned counsel for the State without expressing any opinion on the opijnion of this Court, ends of justice will be to the petitioner to niake a detailed ^vances before the competent authority of copy of this petition and order, within a and on such representation being filed, respondents may decide the same on its ^th law, as early as possible, preferably n^onths from the date of receipt of the obse^ation, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge