@ C ‘ fl'(WS4 / 1N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHI-LATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.No. B?» j‘2009(s.B.} $§m§m%ww APPLICANTS : 1) /, Ghanshyam Prasad Sahu S/o Shri Jai Singh Sahu, aged about 24 years, R/o Village Baihar, Tahsil Arang, District Raipur (M.P.) Ghaneshwar Sahu S/o Shri Puranik Sahu, aged about 28 years, R/ 0 Village Naikbandha, Post Abhanpur, Tahsil Abhanpur, District Raipur (MR) Deoki Dewangan ‘D~ D / o Shri Ramprasad Dewangan, aged about 27 years, R/ o Dewangan General Store, Main Road Baghbahara, District Mahasamund (M.P.) Bhola Ram Yadav S/o Shri Harak Ram Yadav, Aged about 22 years, R/o Village & Post Cbhuiya, WW Q4; (Arising out of WP. No.3127/ 1999 Hon’ble SB.) Tahsil Mahasamund District Mahasamurid (M.Pi) FM WwAwmww Aged about 21 years, NON—APPLICANTS : VERSUS W1) M Smt. Rambha Dewan W/ o Shri Nakchheda Diwan, Aged about 24 years, R/o Village 8L Post Tahsil Mahasamund District Mahasamund (M‘PJ Turanga, State of Madhya Pradesh Through the Chief Secretary MantralayaVa11abh Bhawan Bhopal (MR) The Secretary Panchayat 85 Social Welfare Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan Bhopal (MR) The Secretary School Bhawan Bhopal (M.P.) The Director Public Instructions Madhya Pradesh Satpura Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) The Joint Director Public Instructions, Raipur Division, Raipur (M.P.) Janpad Panchayat Arang District Raipur Through Chief Executive Officer, War o,Jw wwwmmmwm Education Department Government of M.P. Mantralaya, Vallabh Janpad Panchayat Abhanpur District Raipur (M .P.) Through Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kurud District Dhamtari Through Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Mahasamund District Mahasamund M.P. Through Chief Executive Officer, APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF THE WP. No. W,» 3127/ 1999 /‘ Janpad Panchayat Bagbahara District Mahasamund (M.P.) Through Chief Executive Officer, \ 95* HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. No‘ 507 of2009 APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF THE WP. NO. 3127/1999 $3: Hcm’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotrg J. Shri A.V.Sln‘idhar, Panal Lawyer for the State/non—applicants. ORDER {ORAL} (Passed on 20m day of November. 2009) LA. N0. 1. This is an apphcation for condonation of delay in tiling the restoration application. Sufficient cause has been shown. Delay is condoned. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the counsei for ihe applicant could not appear on account of bonaji‘de mistake, therefore, WP No. 3127 of 1999. which was dismissed on 23rd September, 2009 may be restored to its file. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. WP No. 3127 of 1999 is restored to the original tiie. subject to payment of a cost of Rs. 500/— to the High Court Legal Aid Committee. A copy oi‘this order be placed on record ofthe original writ petition and the same be listed for hearing. Sd/- Satish K. Agnilaotri Judge. Amit Present: Shri C.R.Sahu. Advocate for the applicants. APPLICANTS : Ghanshyam Prasad Sahu & Others. VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS : State ofMadhva Pradesh & Others.