a^ I. eJ'^ .B. BEEX3B.S THE HIGH GogRT Q? GHHATTXSO&RH AT BZI.A3PUR /^. e®ntenptpetitlen So.^7 /2004 PETIT20NER Bbarat Das Val-shaav s/o late viatiE'am Das, aged S6 years, R/o Shari^Pakhna Tehsil Katghora, Distt. Kor6a (C.Q.) V e r s u s RESPONDENTS' GONTEMNORS V^^ ^•'-^ -^- <?<^ v~ >A°J'^'l^y'' ^%^- ,^"y'y ^P^Tto^-*' ! 1. Sfeate e£ Ghtaattisgarh Tla-ough s The Seeretary, Eiepartment ef Sslaeduled .Castes & Sotieduled Tribes Bevalopme&t Ma&tralaya, B.K.S.Ballaing Raipur (e.s.). 2. The Bireeter, BiBeetorate ef Sstieduled Gast.as aad Ssheduled Tribea Bevelopnenfe, Ralpur (G.Q.) ^' 3. Ass.i.stant Bireettor, Trxbal Beve.Lopnenk, Korba Blstt. Korba (G.S.) 4. Blocte Bevelepmen-fcEdaaafcion offleer Podi-Upreda, Tetisll Katghora Dlstt. Korba (G.G.). 5. Smt. SfaaKuntala Nirala W/o Shri S.R.N.i.rala, aged 30 years ItoEising ae Assft. Teaaher, Supdt. Kanya Astaram , Katori Nagoa., Bloak Sevelopinenfe, Pod.l.-tlproda, Bistt. Korba (C.@«5. ... .contel, <•;-(•"•'.•.r:'.r\-'-l^s-.ca3--.®'3i).''T33Sgsis®EEpSSRi?'FI?RS^^a^^l'lS'H^B^ w.-=F—aii^ ?= eoNTEfrIpT PE'riTJOS UHDER ARTJCIiE 21S OS THE GONSTOTHTZON OF 1NDJA, REASWITH SEcTIGN 2 (b) AND 12 OF C@HTEMPT ©F GQBRTS'.&GT, 1971. XI-HC-78 sn^rw^iN; HqTsn^iOTra; •^fv^ 3^ y|i'l<lcl^l, ®T{l-y<is,ft<ni'yy ) C7M)til 1'Vy ,...to^.^...%^°l *(TWli sh*ii«n ^l^!(|l4sitti (l°tty«^T) (5) ?T(TraTflf?ff3ncw !e-e-2oc's Shrt S.V. Purohit, coun^sl for the oetttioner +wf<ri<n-i *iiK<A'^'fa'<a ^tat ^iSTRtITSn^T The petiiionor has fi'ed this contsmpt peniion aiieging that rsspondents have not foJiow^d th®ordsr of Shis Court dated 28-11-2003 72003 (Smt. Shakuntala Nirate V. State of Chhattisgarh). Learnea' eounsei ror ine petitionersubmiEed that responaent No.5 was ths Fetitiorier in that Detition and ss per the orderciatsd 28-11-2003 she ought to have fiied repre^entetion which she ha.s not fLted, therefore, shshsscoiTsynittsctcoHt^T'Hspt.l The conteniion of iearn^d counsei for the pstiiioner is Soiaiiy devoid of msrit. !n the first fnstanc^, the petitioner was not party to tha W.P. Ne.32S7/2Q03 and the ord^r was passed in the petition riled by responden; No.5 in wnlcn coilnsei fer respondent No.5 made a reouest to the Court to alipw the petiti^ner to make a detailed TepresentetJQn to respQndont No.2 LS. th& D'ro^tor wthih 10 dsys snd iri tum T93poftd$nt No.2 was directed to decid®r^sresentatton. ff Smt. Shakuntaia Niraia has not fi'led reprcsentation that Js|her own decteion. If she does not want to fiie any representation in ordet' to rea'ress her grievance, it is her Ghoice. 3y any stretch of imagjnatfor] Court's order or willfui coil it cannot&e termsd as deflance of the tempt committed, by resoondenf N6.5. Therefore, the petil'ion is iiabie ^ bffdismissed and same is dtsmissed. Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge r~!: -/' e!ifl