IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 11431 of 1994 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- DHARMENDRA G UPADHYAY Versus UNION OF INDIA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR HJ NANAVATI for Petitioner None present for Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 09/09/97 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the special civil application. 2. The applications were invited vide advertisement, annexure `A' for the post of L.D.C.. In response to the said advertisement, the petitioner submitted an application and the respondent No.4 was also one of the applicants for that post. The petitioner was called for interview and thereafter he has been informed that his name has been placed at Sr. No.1 in the select list prepared by the Selection Committee. The petitioner was also working on part-time basis and having the apprehension that he will not be given appointment and the respondent No.4 is to be favoured, filed this special civil application before this Court, and prayer has been made for direction to the respondent to give him appointment on the post of L.D.C. on regular basis. 3. Reply to the special civil application has been filed by the respondents along with the copy of selection proceedings wherefrom I find that the respondent No.4 was the person who has been selected for the post of L.D.C.. The petitioner has not controverted the document, annexure `C', the proceedings of the Selection Committee. The respondent further stated that by mistake it has been communicated to the petitioner that he has been placed at Sr. No.1 in the select list. 4. In view of the fact that the petitioner has not been selected by the Selection Committee he has no case in his favour. The special civil application is dismissed. Rule discharged. ********** zgs/-