«y? HZGH CGURT OF CHHATTISG$RH AT B!LA$¥‘UR V33 : mmfBLE $HRI JI3$T§€E 9R1?ENKER DIWAKER W.?.IS§ N0. 3155z2€30§ Asian; Khan PETITEDNER Versus N RESPGNDENTS State of C.G 8n Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 225 OF THE N CONsTITUTION OF INDIA Aggeaxance: ‘ 31m p.s.Koshy, counssl for the pgtitioner. 3. S Ii Sumesh Bajaj, GA. for thc Stateh‘asp. N GRAL oRbER (oamnzacm Challenge in the present petition 1's to the order (hie 29.6.2009 (Annexure P] 1} by which working on the post of four months he has been shifted. further contended ’tha't he representation to the Dixector Fish has already $ed a en‘es-and he may be raisiog permitted his; to grievance. $e a fresh He representation prays that rill to the said authority his representation 1's decided by the competent authority, the petitioner may be m c1 the petitioner who is 9W allowsd to perform his duties at thé present place of posting is. at Raigarh. Learned counsd for the S’tata has no objection if a direction for déciding tha representation is made. Coilsidermg th€ totality of the facts, tha petitioner is directeci to make a representation to the respondeuts N0. 3, within a period of seven days from th within a further oeriod of three weeks from the date of its all then the petitioner shall not be order, which shaH be decided by the e date of receipt of this authorities concemeri receipt. 1t is clarified that relieved from the present place of posting, if not already relieved. With the above observation, the petition stands disposed of. . V _ Sdl— Pritinker Diwaker Judge ii