_Sngl9_SencB ^ ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR ^ • M. C. C. N0 ^^ OF 2009 APPLICANT y^PPLICANT 1..^ l-'^ ...^J^ ^^^' ^ ^ xw' NON-APPLICANTS: RESPONDENTS z. ^Narayan, aged about 72 years Son of Late Shri Pachkauda, Agficylturist, Resident of Village Saloni, Tahsil Nagari, District Dhamtari (C.G.). VERSUS Board of Revenue, through its Secretary, Principal Seat, Bilaspur (C.G.). AddJtional Collector Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.). Sub Divisional Officer, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.). Smt. Urmila Bai, aged about 65 years Wife of Bhagwat Gonda, Resident of Village Dogardula/ Tahsil Nagari, District Dhamtari (C.G.). APPLICATION FOR R^STORATION OF WRIT PETITION N0. 768 /2. 3. fSTC OF 2004. "NARAYAN V/S. BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS" The applicant named above, respectfully submits as - under:- r fC^} HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Applicant Non-Applicants M.C.C. No.354 of2009 Narayan VERSUS Board ofRevenue & Others Gowri APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF THE WRIT^ETmON SB: Hon'ble Shri SatisA K. Asnihotri, J. Present: Shri P. Tiwary, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. - Shri Dasharath Prajapati, Advocate for the respondent No.4. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 1st day ofAugust, 2011) I.A.No. 1. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing restomtion application. Sufficient cause has been shown. Leamed counsel appearing for other side have no objection, however, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.4 insisted for imposing some cost for condoning the delay in filing the MCC. Delay is condoned, subject to payment of a sum of Rs.1,500/- to the respondent No.4. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the counsel for the applicant could.not appear on account of bona fide mistake, therefore, W.P. No.768 of 2004, which was dismissed on 20-10-2008, may be restored to its file. 2. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. W.P. No.768 of 2004 is restored to the original file. 3. A copy ofthis order be placed on record of original writ petition and the same be listed for hearing. Satish K. Agnihotn Judge