-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.225 OF 2005 In WRIT PETITION NO.1050 OF 2003 Jennifer Ulhas Chavan : Petitioner V/s. Air India Limited & Anr. : Respondents ... Mr.Anand Grover i/b.RMG Law Associates for the petitioner. Mr.S.J.Saluja with Mr.M.V.Kini for the respondents. ... CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE & S.R.DONGAONKAR,JJ. DATE : MARCH 17, 2006. P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Grover in support of this Motion. Mr.Saluja appears for the respondents. 2. The petitioner is an Airhostess working with the respondent-Airlines. The petitioner is not being given flight duty on the ground that her weight is above the permissible limit. The petition filed by her to challenge all the concerned decisions of the respondents has already been admitted. She has been given liberty to apply, on fulfilling the weight requirements. That order has been passed when the petition was admitted on 11.8.2003. -: 2 :- 3. The present Motion has two prayers. The first prayer is that the petitioner be listed for flying duties. That cannot be done inasmuch as that will amount to allowing the petition by an order on a Notice of Motion. The second prayer is that she be given the same treatment and facilities given to other Airhostesses for weight reduction. 4. Mr.Saluja appearing for the respondents states that the petitioner is being given and will be given the same treatment and facilities which are presently prevalent and which are being given to other Airhostesses for weight reduction. Mr.Grover appearing for the petitioner disputes this statement. It will be open to the petitioner to write to the respondents and point out whatever facilities that she wants in that behalf and we expect the respondents to give all such facilities and necessary assistance in that behalf, if what Mr.Saluja is saying is correct. This is only to facilitate the petitioner to resume her flight duty, at the earliest. 5. Motion stands disposed of. H.L. GOKHALE, J. -: 3 :- S.R.DONGAONKAR, J.