1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1918 OF 1992 Shri S.J.Mirchandani & ors .. Petitioners versus Shri Madhukar Patil, Collector of Thane & ors .. .. Respondents Mr.Vinod Jadhav h/f Mr.M.L.Patil for Petitioners Mr.V.S.Gokhale, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent nos 1 and 3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : S.B.MHASE AND S.B.MHASE AND S.B.MHASE AND D.G.KARNIK, D.G.KARNIK, D.G.KARNIK, JJ JJ JJ DATED DATED DATED : 20th January, 2006 : 20th January, 2006 : 20th January, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that in view of the judgment of the Full Bench in Sanjay Govind Sakpal & ors vs.Collector of Dhule & ors reported in 2004 (2) Maharashtra Law Journal 874, the challenge made in this petition does not survive. He further states that in any event the petition has become infructuous as the petitioners have already been reverted and have accepted the reversion and continued in 2 service at their original posts. He therefore submits that the petition may be disposed of as infructuous. The statement is accepted. 2. Petition is disposed of as infructuous. Interim orders, if any, shall stand vacated. (D.G. (D.G. (D.G. KARNIK, J) KARNIK, J) KARNIK, J) (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, J) J) J)