1 WP No. 395 /2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 395 OF 2011 Shri Chandrakant Kashiram Sonkusare ..Petitioners Versus 1. The District Supply Officer Nashik and others. .Respondents Mr P.N.Joshi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms P.S.Cardozo,AGP for respondent nos 1 to 5. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date : 15th June, 2011. P.C.: 1. Heard both sides. 2. The District Supply Officer, Nashik, by an order dated 1.8.2010, cancelled the authorization/license of the petitioner in respect of a fair price shop. A revision application challenging that order has been dismissed by the Deputy Commissioner (Supplies), Nashik Division, Nashik. It is not disputed that the order at page 96 is unreasoned. The revision application of the petitioner cannot be decided in this manner. The proceedings have serious consequences inasmuch as the authorization is cancelled. That cancellation has been T 2 WP No. 395 /2011 challenged and, therefore, the revisional authority was obliged to hear the parties and pass a reasoned order. That being not done, the impugned order is set aside and the revision application is restored to file of the revisional authority who shall now be the Commissioner/Addl.Commissioner, Revenue Division, Nashik. The revisional authority will hear the petitioner and pass a fresh reasoned order within a period of eight weeks from the date the petitioner appears before the Commissioner/Addl.Commissioner. The petitioner agrees to appear before him as expeditiously as possible and by 20.6.2011 at 11 am. The Commissioner shall, thereafter, hear him and pass a fresh order as directed. The petition is allowed in these terms with no order as to costs. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.)