IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.15468 of 2011 Date of Decision : August 24, 2011. Amrik Kumar .....Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.S.S.Khaira, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner was statedly appointed as a Pharmacist in Government Dispensary, Gho, Tehsil and District Pathankot in the year 2006. It is stated that the then Medical Officer started misbehaving with the petitioner and the residents of the village and refused to mark his presence since February, 2010. The petitioner further alleges that his services have been dispensed with without passing any formal order. He accordingly seeks a direction for his reinstatement with all consequential benefits. It is not in dispute that the petitioner has been appointed under the Zila Parishad, Gurdaspur, now Pathankot. The questions sought to be CWP No.15468 of 2011 [2] raised by the petitioner are the pure questions of fact which can be effectively gone into by the Competent Authority. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the Secretary, Zila Parishad, Gurdaspur/Pathankot to ascertain the correct facts and determine the petitioner's claim by passing a speaking order, within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 24, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE