1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 1327 OF 2007 Satish Kumar Tulsiram Agawal v. M.S.E.B. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders Mr.S.A. Banik Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.M. Quazi Advocate for Respondent. ..... CORAM: A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 17th JULY, 2007. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Order dated 6.10.2006 rejecting the application for recalling the witness for cross-examination, who was examined on 22.10.1993, is under challenge in the present writ petition. The counsel for the petitioner submits that during the period of 13 years he had been making applications, amendments etc. and that is the reason why the witness could not be called for cross-examination. The claim in suit is for recovery of electricity 2 bills and the petitioner has been successful in evading the same for the last number of years. The fact that the petitioner took 13 years to apply to recall the witness for cross- examination speaks volume against the conduct of the petitioner. In the circumstances, petition stands dismissed. JUDGE /TA/