IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14041 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 04, 2011 Jaibir ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. There is no cause really made out for invoking the writ jurisdiction of the court. The only grievance made is that authorities were not entertaining the application under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holding (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948. It is for the petitioner to pursue his remedy before the authorities instead of approaching the writ court for this purpose. Dismissed. August 04, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE