XI—HC-22 mm WW mmmm 8.3.: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. PRITI 439 12 2010 entitled to second Kramonnati as Annexure P/2) 85 11,1.2010 (Annex P/3)V He submits that the ‘ssue involved in the present petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in the mat er 0f R.S.Verma Vs‘ State of 3hhattisgarh and Others (WP. No. 2 05/2002) by judgment and )rder dated 29.8.06. He further subm s that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representati n to consider the case of the aetitioner in the light of the judgmen passed by the Hon’ble Apex SCW/ 1) and the order passed in R.S.Virma (supra) to which learned :ounsel for the respondent/ State has n objection. Sourt in the matter 0f State 0f Tripura :o make a representation before t expected from the competent authority :he petitioner as expeditiously as p preferably within a period of three m :opy of this order. iberty. In View of above, the petition is ed; L WW Wm éswm ‘NKER DIWAKER Shri K.S.Pawar, counsel for the phtitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, P.L. for the State Counsel for the petitioner su mits that the petitioner is circular dated 3.10.2008 Others Vs. K.K.Roy (2004 d Accordingly, the liberty sought f r by the petitioner is granted concerned authority. it is decide the representation of ble in an objective manner s from the date of receipt of isposed of with the aforesaid Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker ' Judge 311w m W...M¢.G?:tsm¢g7ui ”1a 2 Ce W we are} u h o h o r o i ( ‘