IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1568 of 2001 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ MIRABEN GATULAL CHUNILAL KAHAR Versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 1568 of 2001 MR SATISH R PATEL for Petitioner No. 1 MS BINODA GAJJAR AGP for Respondent No. 1-3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA Date of decision: 11/09/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. When the matter is called out, Mr. S.R. Patel, learned advocate for the petitioner and Ms. Binoda Gajjar, learned AGP, both are present. 2. Ms. Gajjar, learned AGP, states that the order of detention dated February 9, 2001 which is impugned in this petition has been revoked by the detaining authority by order dated July 10, 2001 and, therefore, she urged to pass appropriate orders. 3. In view of the aforesaid statement made by Ms. Gajjar, when the order of detention is revoked by the detaining authority, the petition has now become infructuous and deserves to be disposed of accordingly. 4. For the foregoing reasons, the petition stands disposed of as it has become infructuous. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. (A.M. Kapadia, J.) --- (karan)