IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 5TH OCTOBER 2007 / 13TH ASWINA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 1394 of 2007(S) ---------------------------------------------- (ORDER IN W.P.(C).NO.35036/2005 DATED 07/04/2006) .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER: -------------------------------------- JOSE.L., AGED 39 YEARS, S/O. LAZER J., JOSE BHAVAN, ZION HILL, VEMBAYAM P.O., NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SMT.M.P.MARY. RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.2: --------------------------------------------------- SHRI.P.SIVAJADAS, SECRETARY, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, O/O THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI. ALEXANDER THOMAS, SC, KPSC. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------------- CONTEMPT CASE (C) NO.1394/2007-S ----------------------------------------- JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court, alleging that the P.S.C has not obeyed the direction of this Court in Annexure-I order. Pointing out this alleged contumacious conduct of the P.S.C., the petitioner caused to issue a lawyer notice. In answer to the said notice, the Standing Counsel for the P.S.C issued Annexure-IV reply notice. In the said notice, it is stated that the petitioner's name has been deleted from the list on 3.6.2003. In view of the above position, the contempt application at the instance of the petitioner against the alleged violation of Annexure-I order is not maintainable. The learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the removal, if any, made is illegal. If that be so, the petitioner may work out his remedy against the same. Subject to the above observation, the contempt application is closed. 5th October, 2007. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. Nm/