gst 1 caa1019.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1019 OF 2010 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1200 OF 1996. Smt.Vithabai Jothya Bhandari& Ors.. .... ...Applicants. V/s Valory Anthony Pereira.... .... ..Respondents. Mr.Deepak Chitnis, adv. For the applicants. Ms.Aparva Harse i/by Mr.Suresh Chandrashet, Adv. For respondents. CORAM: D.G.KARNIK, J. 18th Nov., 2010. PC: 1. Heard. 2. By consent civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Office objection stand waives. gst 2 caa1019.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1200 OF 1996. Smt.Vithabai Jothya Bhandari& Ors.. .... ...Applicants. V/s Valory Anthony Pereira.... .... ..Respondents. Mr.Deepak Chitnis, adv. For the appellants. Ms.Aparva Harse i/by Mr.Suresh Chandrashet, Adv. For respondents. CORAM: D.G.KARNIK, J. 18th Nov., 2010. PC: Mr.Chtinis, learned counsel for the appellant states that the appeal is directed against an interlocutory order and during pendency of the appeal the main suit itself has been decided the appeal has therefore become infructuous. Statement is accepted. Appeal is dispose of as infuctuous.