IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 25068 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 03.10.2011 Veerpal Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Vivek Goel, Advocate for Mr. K.B.S. Mann, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. …. RAJESH BINDAL, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though vide order dated 19.8.2011, the petitioner was granted liberty to appear before the learned court below and furnish his fresh bail bonds, however, he could not do so, as the petitioner incidentally inhaled pesticide spray in the fields and remained admitted in hospital for 10 days. Thereafter, he was advised bed rest. The next date of hearing is October 13, 2011. The petitioner will put in appearance on or before the next date of hearing. Learned counsel for the State submitted that the petitioner having absented from the court after grant of bail, does not deserve concession of bail again. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions made above, in my opinion, the petitioner deserves to be permitted to appear in the court on or before the next date of hearing i.e. 13.10.2011 and furnish his fresh bail bonds in terms of order dated 19.8.2011. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 03.10.2011 sharmila