[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.814 OF 2007 Milind Uttam Shirsekar and Ors. ..Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Ms.V.S.Jagdale advocate for applicants Mr.K.V.Saste A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : MARCH 26, 2007 DATE : MARCH 26, 2007 DATE : MARCH 26, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants are apprehending arrest in respect of complaint under Section 498-A of IPC which will be filed by Mrs.Madhuri wife of applicant no.1. It is apprehended that the said complaint will be filed at Chirag Nagar Police Station, Ghatkopar (W), Mumbai. 3. The learned A.P.P. states that he does not have instructions in the matter. However, in my [-2-] opinion, the following order would meet the ends of justice. 4. In the event of arrest in connection with the complaint under Section 498-A of IPC which will be filed by Mrs.Madhuri the wife of applicant no.1 against the present applicants at Chirag Nagar Police Station, Ghatkopar (W), Mumbai, the applicants shall be given 72 hours notice prior to their arrest. 5. It is made clear that in case, notice is received by the applicants, the necessary application for anticipatory bail shall be made before the concerned Sessions Court. 6. Application is disposed of. [ V.K.Tahilramani, J.]