IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 17TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 28TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 5164 of 2009(M) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. C.S.INDIRA, LECTURER IN HINDI, CO-OPERATIVE ARTS & SCIENCE COLLEGE, KALLINGAL LANE, THRISSUR. 2. RATHI SAJEEVAN, LECTURER IN COMMERCE, CO-OPERATIVE ARTS & SCIENCE COLLEGE, KALLINGAL LANE, THRISSUR. 3. SHEENA BILJEN, LECTURER IN COMMERCE, CO-OPERATIVE ARTS & SCIENCE COLLEGE, KALLINGAL LANE, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.V.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCITIES (GENERAL) THRISSUR. 2. THE TRICHUR TALUK CO-OPERATIVE COLLEGE, EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY LTD., NO. R 728, REP. BYITS SECRETARY, KALLINGAL LANE, TRICHUR. 3. THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE TRICHUR TALUK CO-OPERATIVE COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY NO. R 728 REP. BY ITS CONVENER, KALLINGAL LANE, TRICHUR. R1 BY GP SRI K C SANTHOSH KUMAR R2 AND R3 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI P C SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO. 5164 OF 2009 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2009 JUDGMENT Notice to respondents 2 and 3 dispensed with, preserving their right to move for review of this judgment, if aggrieved. Learned Government Pleader appears for first respondent. 2. Petitioners state that they are members of the second respondent and are lecturers in an educational establishment of the second respondent. They say that they have filed Exts.P2 and P3 before first respondent requesting that ineligible members may be removed. A perusal of Exts.P2 and P3 also show that they have even pointed out the identity of the persons, who according to them, are ineligible to continue as members of the second respondent. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is ordered directing that first respondent will look into Exts.P2 and P3 and take any action that may be found appropriate and necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, however, with appropriate notice and hearing in accordance with law, to all persons who are entitled to be heard in that regard. Let this be done at the earliest, but not in any manner affecting the working of the educational establishments of second respondent. THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE lgk/18/2