1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION (Lodging) NO.1039 OF 2009 Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. Ranbhadur B. Singh & anr. ...Respondents. Ms.Disha Karambar for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 5th February, 2010. P.C.- 1 This petition is under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Act). There is consistent default and though served, none appeared for the respondents to deny the averments so raised. 2 This Court has already granted prayer (b) on 5.10.2009. Considering the averments made, I am inclined to confirm the said prayer (b) as already granted. 3 The petition is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer (b). 4 The liberty is granted to the respondents to settle the matter and/or furnish the security. 2 5 All points are kept open to be agitated before the Arbitral Tribunal, if any as the same is pending. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)