IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 5TH DECEMBER 2006 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 WP(C).No. 32242 of 2006(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ M.I.GISHNU KUMAR, MADAVANAPPARAMBIL HOUSE, P.O.KOONAMMAVU, VALLUVALLY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN SRI.K.S.RAJESH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE CORPORATION OF KOCHI, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE BIRTHS & DEATHS REGISTRAR, (THE HEALTH SUPERVISOR), CORPORATION OF KOCHI, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE CHIEF REGISTRAR, (THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT), OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1-R2 BY ADV.MR.S.RAMESH BABU, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No.32242 of 2006 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 5th December, 2006 JUDGMENT Adv.Mr.S.Ramesh Babu, Standing Counsel takes notice for respondents 1 and 2. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the first respondent- Corporation is not taking a decision on Ext.P2 representation submitted by him seeking correction of the name of his son as 'M.G.Navneeth' in place of the name presently entered, i.e. 'Abiram Gishnu'. I do not propose to examine the entitlement of the petitioner to have the correction applied for in Ext.P2. However since Ext.P2 is pending before the 2nd respondent, it is only proper that the 2nd respondent takes an earlier decision on Ext.P2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition will stand disposed of in the following terms: The 2nd respondent will take up Ext.P2, consider the same in the light of Ext.P3 and any other material which may be placed by the petitioner in support of Ext.P2 and take a correct and just decision on Ext.P2 at the earliest and at any rate within three weeks of receiving a copy of this judgment. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE