:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3979 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3979 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3979 OF 2005 Smt. Sandhya Prakash Naiknaware ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Shri. A.P. Mundargi for the Applicant. Shri. A.S. Gadkari A.P.P. for the Respondent. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATED : JULY 01, 2005. DATED : JULY 01, 2005. DATED : JULY 01, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The prayer in this Application filed by the original Accused is for suspension of the order of conviction. It is stated that on the basis of order of conviction, disciplinary proceedings are sought to be initiated against the Applicant who is a Government Employee. The conviction of the Applicant is under section 409 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. As held by the Apex Court, the suspension of order of conviction can be granted in very rare cases. Considering the findings recorded by the Court of the Magistrate and learned Additional Sessions Judge, I find that this is not a case where relief of suspension of conviction can be granted. Hence, application is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE