IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2009 SHRI. JAIDEV K. SALGAONKAR ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. SAMBHAJI SHIV MADKHOLKAR ... Respondent Mr. Rahul Satardekar, Advocate for the petitioner. Respondent no.1 present in person. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 7th July, 2009 P.C. Heard. Notice. Respondent no.1 who is present accepts notice. The Counsel on behalf of the Petitioner/accused states that a sum of Rs. 30,000/- has already been paid to the Respondent No.1/Complainant on 1.7.2009. Respondent no.1/Complainant who is present accepts the said position and further states that they have decided to compound the offence. In view of the said compromise arrived at between the parties, the offence under Section 138 of NIA, 1881 shall stands compounded and the accused is acquitted therefrom. Consequently, the impugned judgment is hereby set aside. Application disposed of. Authenticated copy be issued to the parties. N. A. BRITTO, J. at*