THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.21852 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner and the 3rd respondent studied together initially in a school, and thereafter, the Intermediate course. He alleges that at the instance of the 3rd respondent, Sri B.Vivekanand and Satyanarayana beat him, on 17.04.2006. On a complaint filed by him, a crime was registered by the Station House Officer, Sanjeev Reddy Nagar P.S., Hyderabad, the 2nd respondent, and it is being tried as C.C.No.1830 of 2006 by the Court of III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally. The case against the 3rd respondent, who was arrayed as A.3, was dropped, on the ground that she was absconding and she was discharged. The petitioner filed a Revision Petition No.75 of 2009 in the Court of Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, and it is said to have been allowed on 19.06.2009. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 2nd respondent has not taken any steps to arrest the 3rd respondent so far. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Home. The petitioner appears to be determined in implicating the 3rd respondent, on one pretext or the other. He did not attribute any direct acts of assault to her. Still he included her name in the complaint and the same resulted in her being arrayed as A.3. The grievance of the petitioner appears to be more against the 3rd respondent, than the persons, who are said to have beaten him. Assuming that the 3rd respondent continues to be arrayed as A.3 and not discharged, the petitioner cannot insist on her being arrested. It is ultimately for the concerned Court and the police to decide about the nature of steps to be taken in the matter. The petitioner cannot have the genuine grievance against the 3rd respondent, particularly when the allegations against her are not so serious. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.26.02.2010. GJ