1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4895/02 Kumari Jyoti Parashar vs. State & Anr. Date of order : 18/3/2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri S.K. Saksena for the petitioner. Shri Pradeep Kalwania, Addl. Govt. Counsel for the State. Shri S.S. Raghav for respondent. ****** Shri S.K. Saksena, learned counsel for the petitioner has cited the judgement of this Court in Kumari Ritu Parashar vs. State & Ors., S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6794/02 decided on 3.7.08 and judgement of coordinate bench of this Court in Anita Kumari & Anr. vs. State of Raj. & Anr.-2005 (7) RDD 2323 (Raj.). It was contended that Rule 10 of the Rajasthan Education Service Rules, 1970 was declared ultra vires of the provisions of the Constitution and therefore the prescribed 24 years as the minimum age of eligibility has been held to be illegal. Learned counsel for the respondents is not in a position to dispute the factual contents of the submissions. In view of the fact that Rule 10 of the 2 Rules of 1970 in so far as it prescribes 24 years as minimum age for eligibility has already been declared ultra vires of Article 14 of the Constitution, the requirement of 24 years as the minimum age cannot be insisted upon and as the petitioner was 23 years of age at the relevant time which is more than 21 years, she is held to be eligible to apply for appointment on the post of School Lecturer. The respondents are therefore directed to declare the result of the petitioner and in case the petitioner is found to have been selected on her merit, forward her case for appointment to the Government in accordance with the Rules. Compliance of the judgement be made within three months from the date copy of the judgement is produced before the respondents. The writ petition is accordingly allowed with no order as to costs. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/