IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 14TH JUNE 2010 / 24TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 18359 of 2010(O) -------------------------- OS.283/2006 of MUNSIFF-MAGISTRATE COURT, SASTHAMCOTTA .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- GOPALA PILLAI, AGED 67 YEARS, S/O.KOCHAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT 'SANTALAYAM', MAINAGAPALLY VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU SRI.JAGAN ABRAHAM M. GEORGE SRI.P.G.PRAMOD SRI.RAHUL KANDAMPULLY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. VELU PILLAI, AGED 86 YEARS, S/O.NEELAKANDA PILLAI, RESIDING AT TEKKEPILLIL HOUSE, VENGA MURI, MAINAGAPALLY VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI, AGED 72 YEARS, S/O.NEELAKANDA PILLAI, RESIDING AT PALAKKOTT HOUSE, VENGA MURI, MAINAGAPALLY VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI, AGED 69 YEARS, S/O.KOCHAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT RAMACHANDRA BHAVANAM, KADAPPA MURI, MAINAGAPPALLY VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 4. VISWANATHA PILLAI, AGED 62 YEARS, S/O.KOCHAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT CHARUVILPUTHEN VEEDU, MAINAKAPALLY VILLAGE, KADAPPA MURI, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 5. SARASWATHY AMMA, AGED 67 YEARS, D/O.BHAVANI AMMA, RESIDING AT PRAKASH BHAVAN, MAINAKAPALLY VILLAGE, KADAPPA MURI, KOLLAM DISTRICT. WP(C) NO.18359/2010 2 6. VIJAYAMMA, AGED 52 YEARS, D/O.BHAVANI AMMA, RESIDING AT KUTTIVILA VADAKKATHIL HOUSE, MAINAKAPALLY VILLAGE, KADAPPA MURI, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 7. SUSEELA, AGED 47 YEARS, D/O.BHAVANI AMMA, RESIDING AT THULASI BHAVAN, PORUVAZHI VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.18359 of 2010 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of June, 2010. JUDGMENT Petitioner is defendant No.3, a senior citizen involved in O.S.No.283 of 2006 of the court of learned Munsiff-Magistrate, Sasthamcotta. That is a suit filed by respondent No.1 against petitioner and respondent No.2 onwards for a declaration that partition deed No.3811 of 2005 and cancellation deed No.3808 of 2004 are null and void and for consequential reliefs. According to respondent No.1/plaintiff, the said documents are created fraudulently forging his signature. Petitioner states that all the parties to the suit are senior citizens and that based on the pendency of suit respondent No.1 is making unsustainable claims over the property and hence petitioner and others are being put to difficulties. Petitioner therefore prayed for early disposal of the suit. Having regard to the circumstances, I direct the learned Munsiff-Magistrate, Sasthamcotta to dispose of O.S.No.283 of 2006 as expeditiously as possible if pre-trial steps are over. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. THOMAS P.JOSEPH, Judge. cks