, fil;'?ate&!8t'!icis c^2\^^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) N0. £<2>-S5> /2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS l^. ^ ff>'1y .'•S ^w^y ^•^.-.•••^ •^' ^l^A-' Manoj Kumar Sharma, S/o R.K. Sharma, aged about 45 years R/o Udai Chowk, Katiyapara, Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil & Distt. BUaspur (C.G.). VERSUS : 1. State ofChhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary Health School Education, Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Directorate of Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.) -3. Collector, Bilaspiir Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. District Education Officer, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (G.G.) 5. Block Education Officer, Takhatpur, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.)^ , ' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226 QFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 ' . . : . • : . • 1. PARTICULARS OF THEPETITIONEIUS):- As pei? the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THERESPONDENT (S):- As per the cause title. 3. PARTICULARS OF THE ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE PETITION IS MADE AND SUBJECTMATTER IN ••": HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRIT PETITIWT (S) No. 6353_of2011 Manoj Kumar Sharma. VERSUS RE8PONDENTS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WKTLPETnTONUNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri, J. Present: Shri Vimlesh Bajpai, Advocate for the petitioner Shri Arun Sao, Govemment Advocate for the State/respondents ORDER (Passed on 30tt day ofNovember, 2011) I.ANo.2. This is an applieation for withdrawal of the wnt petition, on fhe grounds stated therein. Leamed eounsel appearir^ for other side has no objection. It is ordered accordingly. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge Amit