1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 5538/2007 (Prashant Manohar Bondre Vs. Nav Prabhat Shikshan Sanstha & ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM :D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 20, 2008. Heard Mr. Shende for the petitioner. The counsel for the petitioner states that father of the petitioner was in the employment of School run by the respondent no.1- Management, as a Peon, and died while in the employment, on 29/8/2004. It is submitted that after the death of his father, the petitioner made an application to the Management for grant of service on compassionate ground, which is pending from long time. It is further contended that the Education Officer, (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, 2 Bhandara, vide communication dated 25/5/2007, which is annexed with the petition, addressed to the Secretary of the respondent no.1- Management, communicated to the Management to forward the proposal of the petitioner for consideration and taking appropriate steps in the matter. However, till this date, the Management has not acted upon the said communication and, therefore, the petitioner has approached this Court. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, we permit the petitioner to approach the Management once again with a request to consider the communication dated 25/5/2007 issued by the Education Officer and if there is no other impediment and petitioner is otherwise eligible, we expect the Management to take appropriate steps in this regard in view of the communication dated 25/5/2007. In the normal course, this Court would not have disposed of the 3 petition in absence of the Management, however, it is for the Management to consider the eligibility of the petitioner in view of the communication dated 25/5/2007 issued by the Education Officer, because no prejudice as such would be caused to the Management and, therefore, the petition is disposed of with the above observations. JUDGE JUDGE RMP