'?:?..? ^ ^ i?°° S7rl "'iii. $ ^ S '' ^ &"';'^ ^ ;. ?^i ^ a k *'; 'seA u* Ssu Sdi' &«>iS s; 'Ssy' 6 ^^f^, IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.Gl W.P. (S) N0. 4A^ /2007 PETITIONER '•^ •>-; •s.. A ^ .>•". f> ...••''J< ..• •<?•"'.^' / \^)..i^?y ..•• ^^•"J^ r.>-\':'.--"' ^v--' //y ....-'"^~ >'' ^^ / <^/ ^ RESPONDENTS 1. Adal Sai Painkara Aged about 40 Years, S/o. Shri Sirdhar sai Painkara Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Junwanipara, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director Public Instruction Department Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) No. 447 of 2007 Petitioner : Adal Sai Painkaro Versus ftespondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh <md others W. P. (S) No. 449 of 2007 Petitioner : Khuleshwar Prasad Patel Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh ond others And W. P. (S) No. 450 of 2007 Petitioner : Suresh Kumar Odnsena Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt'isgurh and o'thers SB: Hon'ble Uur. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Mr. Anil Mourya, Advocate for Ihe petitioners. Mr. Satidi Supta, Deputy Sovt. Advocate for the respondents/State. OR D E R k (Po.ssed on 24th doy of Januo.ry, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel dppediring for the petitioners as well as leamed tteputy Sovernment Advocate oppearing for the respondents/Sto'te jointly submit that the facts of the present case is similar to that of in W. P. (s) 6880 of 2006 (Lekhrom Sahu Vs. Sta-te of Chhattisgarh & others), which wofi dispo»dof vide oi^lar dated t2th Oecembar, 2006. They further submit that the question of bw involved is also the same. 2. In view of the above stated submissions made by leamed counsel for the parties, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order dated 12th Decemfaer, 2006 passed by this Court in W. P. (s) 6880 of 2006 (Lekhram Sahu Vs. State of Chhatt-isgarh & others). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record in other connected writ petitions. __- Sd/- Satish K.A8nalotn Judge