IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2011 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 14049 of 2010(E) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- WIRELESS-TT INFO SERVICES LIMITED, REGISTERED OFFICE AT 5-9-62,5TH FLOOR, KHAN LATEEF KHAN ESTATE,KLK ESTATE,FATEH MAIDAN ROAD,HYDERABAD,500001 AND CIRCLE OFFICE AT J&CO CHAMBERS,MANIMALA ROAD,EDAPALLY,COCHIN-24,THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR.SUDEVAN V.D. BY ADV. SRI.A.MOHAMED MUSTAQUE RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE SI OF POLICE,MAVOOR POLICE STATION KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. MOHANDAS,SAROVARAM,ERIMALA, NAYARUEKUZHI P.O,KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. RADHAKRISHNAN P, KEDHARAN HOUSE -DO- 4. T.PARAMESWARAN NAMBISSAN,AANAAD. -DO- 5. P.VASUDEVANA NAMBOOTHIRI,PARAKOTTILLAM,-DO- 6. P.ADHAMANI,KEDHARAM,-DO- 7. SASIDHARAN THAROLE,-DO- R1 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.V.T.K.MOHANAN R2-7 BY ADV. SRI.P.R.SREEJITH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO.14049/2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 06/10/2009. P2: COPY OF THE PERMIT DATED 05/03/2010 ISSUED BY CHATHAMANGALAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT. P3: COPY OF THE REQUEST MADE BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 28/04/2010. P4: COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF EXT.P3. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: R2(a):COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE AND STOP MEMO DATED 05/05/2010 OF THE CHATHAMANGALAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT. R2(b):COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 16/09/2010 WPC.NO.28570/2010 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- WPC No.14049 of 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st March, 2011 JUDGMENT Basant, J. After discussions at the Bar, the learned counsel for the petitioner accepts that the order of the Tribunal in favour of the petitioner has been challenged before this Court and this Court has granted an interim order against the petitioner. In these circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition can now be dismissed without any fetter on the rights of the petitioner to approach this Court later, if police protection is required, after getting a valid permit to undertake the construction. Request accepted. This Writ Petition is dismissed. R.BASANT JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE css/