IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No. 50 of 2010 S.K. Bhalla …......Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ...Respondents. Present: Mr. Manish Arora and Mr. Harpal Singh Rode, Advocates for the petitioner. Date of Decision : 6.7.2010 Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J, (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time acknowledges, that the instant Writ Petition is not maintainable as a Petition in Public Interest under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. He, therefore, states that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant Writ Petition with liberty to seek redressal of the petitioner’s grievances before an appropriate Forum, in accordance with law. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforementioned. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 6.7.2010 Rathour