C^l^ ^ StngteBench IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (Cl N0. w^^ / 2011 J^ ,^y1 ^^ .•• u^ :<s •y RESPONDENJTS VERSUS The National Council For Teacher Education Through - The Member Secretary, National CouTicil for Teacher Education, Hans Bhawan, Wing-II, Bahadur Shah Jafar Marg, Near - R.T.O., New Delhi - 110 002 The Regional Director Western Regional Committee, (W.R.C.) Manas Bhawan, Shyamala Hills, Bhopal, M.P. - 462 002 The State Council of Educational Researeh 85 Training, Through : - Director, State Council of Educational Resarch 85 Training, B.T.I Campus, Shankar Nagar, Raipur-fC.G.) ;iHiit":?^N!»[f ii:N^;^ PETITIONERS TT Bhagirathi Shiksha and Sewa Samiti registered under the Provisions of 1973 Act having its registered office at Nagar P-anchayat Baloda, Distt. Janjgir Champa Through - Its President Rajesh Mishra, S/o Mr.R.K.Mishra, Aged about 32 years, R/o Vinobha Nagar, Bilaspur-fC.G.) ^ ^y' 2. Lal Bahadur Shiksha Mahavidyalaya, Baloda, Distt. Janjgir Champa Through - Its Principal R.K.Kashyap S/o Shri R.L.Kashyap, Aged about 45 years R^o Deendayal colony, Qr.No.623, Mangla, Bilaspur-(C.G.) @ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDLA FQR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRBCTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE KLATTER "<~ ^ The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, School Education Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur .(C.G.) Guru Ghasi Das Central University, Through - Its REgistrar, Bilaspur (C.G.) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (0 N0.4437 OF 2011 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS Bhagirathi Shiksha and Sewa Samiti & Another Versus The National Council for Teacher Education & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Sunil Otwani, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, Advocate for the respondents No.1 & 2. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adv. General forthe State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on this 25th day ofAugust, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel forthe parties. 2. Challenge in this petition is to the legality and validity of the order dated 3-8-2011 (Annexure - P/1) whereby the respondent No.2 has declined to recognize the petitioner institute on the ground that it does not have the land in the name ofthe institute. 3. According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the land should be either in the name of the society/institute, as is evident from the withdrawal order dated 3-5-2011. However, according to the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2, the land should be in the name of institute as per the norm 5 of the Norms and Standards for Bachelor of education programme leading to Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.) degree. 4. Shri Otwani has produced a certified copy ofthe registered sale deed dated 17-10-2005 wherein it appears that the land was purchased by the President ofthe society.i.e. Bhagirathi Shiksha and Sewa Samiti, which has not been considered by the. respondent No.2, as in the impugned order only the document relating to land and communications dated 7-4-2010 & 25-5-2010 have been considered. a r Kr Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner institute complies with all the norms, which are required before grant of recognition by the respondent authorities. In view of foregoing, the respondent No.2 is directed to consider the land deed dated 17-10-2005 and other related documents produced by the petitioner institute, forthwith, thereafter, pass a fresh order, in accordance with law and on its own merits, within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Certified copy today. .~—~~~~— Gowri Judge •:'('