1 S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.656/2003 Smt. Kamla Devi & anr. vs. Babu Lal. Date : 9.9.2005 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. PS Bhati, for the appellants. - - - - - Heard. The appellants/defendants are aggrieved against the order dated 15.7.2003 by which the trial court allowed the injunction application of the plaintiff/respondent and restrained the defendants from alienating the property in dispute during the pendency of the suit. This Court has already dismissed the injunction application of the appellants on 16.10.2003. According to learned counsel for the appellants, the court below has committed serious illegality in allowing the application for grant of injunction in the facts of the case. I have considered the facts of the case and I do not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order by which the trial court restrained the defendants from alienating the property in dispute during the pendency of the suit and by now, more than two years have already passed. 2 In view of the above, this appeal, having no force, is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya