IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 19149 of 2008. Date of Decision: 10.11.2008. Gurbachan Singh ....Petitioner Versus Union of India & others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present : Mr. B.S. Bajwa, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? HEMANT GUPTA. J. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.1 and 2 to take action against respondent No.3 for violating the terms and conditions of the Agreement dated January 12, 2002. The Agreement dated January 12, 2002 has been appended by the petitioner as Annexure P-9. It is the case of the petitioner that in terms of the said Agreement, a sum of Rs.4,54,000/- was taken by respondent No.3 to enable the petitioner and his son to supply gas cylinders to the consumers and that now, respondent No.3 is not permitting the petitioner to deliver gas cylinders to the customers arranged by the petitioner. A perusal of the Agreement dated January 12, 2002 shows that no permission was sought from the Oil Company before execution of the said agreement. The said agreement is a private arrangement arrived at by respondent No.3 with the present CWP No. 19149 of 2008. (2) petition. The violation, if any, any condition of such cannot be permitted to be raised in the writ petition. Any civil right arising out of the said agreement to the petitioner can be raised by him before an appropriate Court. The present writ petition, thus is not maintainable and therefore, the same is dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 10.11.2008. SN