gst 1 caa92.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 92 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1136 OF 2010. Smt.Latabai Laxman Salve .... ..... ..Applicant. V/s Mumbai Mun. Coprn. Of Greater Mumbai... ..Respondent. Mr.Suraj Kudalkar, Adv. For the applicant. Ms.K.K.Soraan, Adv. For BMC. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 25th Jan., 2011 PC: This is an application for restoration of appeal which came to be dismissed for default. For the reasons set out in the application, same is allowed. Appeal is restored to file. gst 2 caa92.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1136 OF 2010. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1394 OF 2010. Smt.Latabai Laxman Salve .... ..... ..Applicant. V/s Mumbai Mun. Coprn. Of Greater Mumbai... ..Respondent. Mr.Suraj Kudalkar, Adv. For the applicant. Ms.K.K.Soraan, Adv. For BMC. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 25th Jan., 2011 PC: Appeal is taken up for admission. By way of present appeal the appellant challenges the order dated 18.1.2010 vide which prayer for ad-interim injunction has been refused. The order under appeal is purely an ad-interim order. The notice of motion itself was made returnable on 1.2.2010 and in all probabilities it might have been decided by now. 2. In that view of the matter I am not inclined to entertain the appeal. Hence appeal is dismissed. However learned trial Court is directed to decide the notice of motion itself on its own merits within period of six weeks from today if not already decided. 3. In view of disposal of appeal, Civil Application No.1394/10 does not survive and the same also stands disposed of.