^( Petitioner HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: Bil-ASPUR Writ Petitipn No. 1237 of 2001 The Princlpal, Govt. N.C.J. College, Dalii Rajhara, Tah. Balod, Distt. Durg (CG) through Nodal Oificer, Court Cases Dr. Komai Singh ShapA'an, age-45 years, S/o. Late Shri T.R. Sharwan R/o. 33- D/3A, Park Road, Dalli Rajhara, Tah. Baiod, Distt. Durg (CG). Versus" 1. Asstt. Estate Ofticer, Office of Estate OfRcer's, Bhiiai Stee! Ptant, Dalli Rajhsra, Tah. Balod, Distt. Durg (CG). 2. Dy.Generai Manager (Mines), Bhiiai Steel P!ant, Daiii Rajhara, Tah. Baiod, Distt.Durg(CG). 3. Bhiiai Stee! Plant, through Managing Dirsctor, Ispat Bhawan,' Bhilai, Dsitrict Durg (CG). (Wrif Petition under Article 226/227 of Constitution of tndia) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Ashok Das Vaishnav with ShriSameer Sahu, counsel the petitioner. Shri V.R. Tiwari, counsel forthe respondents. jp.^.ltA^- (Passed on this 30 h day of September, 2008) Bv this oetition under Article 226 of the Constitution of !ndia, setitioner seeks the followina reliefs. To issue a writ or directton in the nature of certiorari which may be issued by this Court to quash the iltegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. a. Notlce/order dated 16-8-2000 (Annexure P/3$ and b. Notice/order dated 22-3-2001 (Annexure P/10) issued by the respondents"; ••z- 2) The petitioner, thus, in substance is seeking quashing of Annexures P/3 & P/10 whereby the respondents ordsred for enhancement of rent, canceiiation of ailotment and disconnection of electricity, respectiveiy. 3) A bare perusal of the averments in the writ Detrtion reveats that the petitioners entire ciaim in the writ petition is based on the disputed questions of facts,which cannot be gone into in the writ proceedings under Articie 226 of the Constitution of Sndia as the parties v/ould be required to iead evirience in support of their rival claims. 4) in view of the foregoing, i am not inclined to entertain the writ petition in exercise of discretionary lurisdiction under Articie 226 of the Constitution of Sndia with the Siberty to the petitioner to avail the remedies which may be avaiiabte to the petitioner under the relevant provisions of !aw, before the appropriate civii court. 5. With the above Siberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. Consequentiy, interim order passed earlier shaii stand discharged and the pending applications, if any, aiso sfand disposed j£^^ saP^^ irlr