WWW W ‘€...C..) mm - mm (mg) WW§wm , ,v $WM: 3 : HON’BLE MR. TICE Pm 0.993013 Shri Ajay Ku’. Barik; couns Shri Yaibhav GQ‘Jerdhan, P Grievance of Vthe petitioner in the present petition is that o "‘ ’ 5 1'? 2004 he was termmated an hxs Court on 3 12 2008 m W P rexerred an appeal (Annexure respondent No 2 but the said an e subrmts that ends of Jusuce petitioner 1s perm1tted to Withdra ‘hat direction may ’be issued t pending eppeal of the petitioner. State Counselvhas no objec the pending appeai of the petitior order of this Court. Accordingly; the petitione: petition. , The respondent’ No.2 is p petitioner Within a period of three oony oi this order It is made clear that this C ourt has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the aut iority concerned worn be at iibe ty i to‘decide the appeai strictly in‘acc ‘ mites oiwAKER 1 for the petitioner . for the State n oursuart to the direction raven my No 6769/0008 he has airear’y Pf3} on 15 12.0008 beioxe the date. ld be served 1f at this stage, the this petition. Hehowever submits 3 respondent No.2 to decide the eal has not been Jecvdeo t1h 1 u :ion if the respondent NQQ decides ler without being influenced by' the r is permitted tor Withdraw this iirected to decide the appeal of the months from the date of receipt of . $ JUS 2 t 1 o j H v\ ‘ t ]