THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Tr.C.M.P.Nos. 572 of 2010 & 3 of 2011 COMMON ORDER: These two Tr.C.M.Ps are between the same parties. Hence, they are disposed of through a common order. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to, as arrayed in Tr.C.M.P.No.572 of 2010. The petitioner is the husband of the respondent. Their marriage took place at Bodhan, on 12-05-2004. Shortly thereafter, differences have arisen between them. The petitioner is a resident of Dichpalli Village and Mandal, of Nizamabad District. The respondent left the matrimonial home, and is living in the house of her parents, at Bodhan. The petitioner filed O.P.No.61 of 2009 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Nizamabad, under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’), against the respondent. The latter, on the other hand, filed O.P.No.30 of 2010 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Bodhan, under Section 9 of the Act, for restitution of conjugal rights. The petitioner seeks transfer of O.P.No.30 of 2010 to the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Nizamabad. The respondent, on the other hand, filed Tr.C.M.P.No.3 of 2011, for transfer of O.P.No.61 of 2009 from the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Nizamabad, to the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Bodhan. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent. In their respective petitions, the parties have made allegations against each other, and made an attempt to hold the other party, responsible, for the break down of harmonious relations. It is no doubt true that the petitioner, i.e. husband, filed the O.P., under Section 13 of the Act, in the year 2009, and it is thereafter, that the respondent, i.e. the wife, filed O.P., for restitution of conjugal rights. The fact, however, remains that, in relation to the proceedings, that arise under the Act, the convenience of the woman spouse become relevant. Section 19(3)(a) of the Act confers the right upon a woman spouse, to institute the proceedings in the Court, in which she is residing. Apart from that, the inconvenience and hardship to be faced by a woman spouse cannot be ignored. Hence, the Tr.C.M.P.No.572 of 2010 is dismissed. Tr.C.M.P.No.3 of 2011 is allowed, and O.P.No.61 of 2009 is transferred from the Court of Senior Civil judge, Nizamabad, to the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Bodhan. On such transfer, it shall be heard along with O.P.No.30 of 2010. The learned Senior Civil Judge, Bodhan, shall endeavour to dispose of the matter as early as possible, and not later than three months from the date of receipt of the record from the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Nizamabad. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.27-04-2011. KO