1 ca 8938.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8938 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4236 OF 2008 Khayum Khajamiya Shaikh .. Applicant Versus The Nanded District Central Co-op. Bank Ltd., Nanded .. Respondent Shri Vivek Dhage, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri D. N. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 07TH OCTOBER, 2011. PER COURT : . The learned counsel was directed to submit the schedule of minimum wages applicable to the present applicant. The learned counsel are unanimous on the fact that the present employee would not be covered under the said schedule. 2. Shri Dhage, the learned counsel submits that the applicant is paid only Rs. 70/- per day as wages, whereas the bus charges 2 ca 8938.11 paid by the applicant are Rs. 80/- per day. 3. Shri Surwanshi, the learned counsel states that Rs. 70/- per day is paid to each and every daily wager appointed by the present non applicant. There is no discrimination made in that regard. The subject of equal pay for equal work will have to be appreciated. The dispute pertains to regularization of services of the present applicant. In the light of that fix the writ petition for final hearing in the week commencing from 21 st November, 2011. 4. In case the writ petition is not heard within reasonable period, liberty to the applicant to renew his request for early hearing. The civil application is disposed of. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Oct. 11