IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16068 of 2011 Kumari Pushpa Pandit W/O Sri Abhinandan Pandit R/O Village - Bihpur, P.S.- Bihpur, District – Bhagalpur---Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary of Social and Welfare Department Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 2. The Commissioner, Bhagalpur Division, Bhagalpur 3. The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur 4. The District Programme Officer, Bhagalpur 5. The Child Development Project Officer Bihpur, P.S.- Bihpur, District- Bhagalpur 6. Smt. Lakita Kumari W/O Sri Ranjeet Sah R/O Village- Bihpur, P.S.-Bihpur, District- Bhagalpur---Respondents ---------------------------------- 4 29.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. An inspection was carried out of the Centre by the Divisional Commissioner, Bhagalpur. Many infirmities were found with regard to the manner in which the centre was being run both with regard to distribution of take home ration as well as complaint or irregularities in dishing out meals to the beneficiaries. Except apology and putting blame on Sahayaika for lack of cooperation, the inadequacy found during the course of inspection has not been seriously assailed. If that is the position which have been found even by the appellate authority as well the revisional authority then merely saying that there was no complaint of any kind earlier does not absolve the petitioner of her responsibility. The Court would not be unmindful of the object of the policy and the close of the manner of such centers which is monitoring being done by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Infirmity of such kind as well as illegality so pointed out are rampant in so many of centers and those illegalities have been established during the course of inspection as well as in the so called 2 hearing given to petitioner. Without satisfactory explanation there is no reason why this Court should reach out in support of the petitioner by interfering with the impugned order. The Court has not found any illegality in the impugned order in the given set of facts nor any was urged or pointed out. This writ petition is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)