WMTTER xo SERVmE ¢ Egg HxGH COURT OF JUDICATUma Aggg§§§@_(cggmlgg&g WRIT PETITI ON No. %§$3 x gETITIOlEIi : Smt.M£NJU THAKUR, Wife of N.S.Thakur, aged about k5 years, resident cf Bairagpara, P.G. Pandariya, working a as Assistant Teacher prgsently posted ’V\ in the Government Middle School at .» Munmuna, Block Pandariya, district Kabirdham (C.G). .v Vs. EESPONDENTS: 1. State of Ch‘nattisgarh: through: Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.Bhawan, Baipur (£1.01). 2. District Educational Officer, Dist: Kabirdham (C.G) 3. Block Education Officer, Block: Pandariya, Dist: Kabirdham (C.G) gem PEzgrIoN {my “wicm 226/22? OLgBE QONSTITUTION ogggggg pETLiOF THE PErIrlON AI ‘ / KR XI-HC-22 a wan %w$a§w mw fr 7—8—2mé m“. ShaHesh Ahu‘jahcoume! fag" fhe pefifioner‘. Mr. Swish $up‘ra, Depufy 5mm Advocme for The Efafa/respondenfs, m1 advcmce cepy. Heard. By fhg insfanf wri? pea‘rh‘ an under Arm‘icle 226/227 9f "rhe €¢ms?i?u?im af Eradia, fhe pef'moner seeks a direc‘ricn To 1‘he respondems "m pay ‘rhe incremefxfs and senicrHy m ‘fhe ba$is of The dafa {rf har‘ inmai appainfm€m in ‘rha iigh? af Tha decisian rendered by fhe Stafa fkdminisfrafive Tribunai, Jabctipur‘ in 9.A.Na.1452/98 (Harish Chandra Singh & ofhers vs. Stafe cf MP. <3: a?her*s) fhcs‘r aha was appeinfecl as Assismnf Taaci'mr if? fhe Schao! §ducmion D pcrfmen‘r cm probafian for a pericd of mo year's wh‘h f€xed salary. Hawa er, We!" on, m‘mr compiefim af fwo year-s 'ranure ?he pafh‘bnat’ was reg Icrized, bu? aha m m? baing given fha veguhr pay $53k. Ofher simikxrh sifuamd feachers moved fhe Sfa‘fa Admimsfmhve Tribunal, Jabalpur -r reguim" pay scale, wherein learned Tribum‘! viéa 0rder' dafed 31-1~2GOO allawed The same‘ The peTiTioner made severai represenTaTiws Ta award s me TreaTmenT‘ ag she is aisa similarly giTuaTed Lawer‘ Dévisimq Teac:her, b T The reshcndenTs havg naT paid any. heed, Tharefore, sha is forced To fi! Thfs wriT peTiTien. Leamed aounse! f¢r The peTi ionar submiTs ThaT The peTiTiener may be ailowed To make a repreaanTaT Ta respmdenT NGJ Ta give simiiar TreaTmenT Tc Tha peTiTTanar- and he same pay scale which has bear! . (héW) a‘l‘ed 31-1«ZOOO. The mse 0f fhe pefh‘iamr § i. h Sfafe Adminisfrafive Tribuml, £ pefi‘i‘ianer sftmds an fhe same fem ‘rhen she a!so be sancfianad The sqn Wifh The direm‘iens gfar'esai Cansequanfiy, M.(W,)P.Nc.3 51‘and dispaged of. A Parfies are enmied far serf ified copy 0f this away/W Sd/- L.C. BhadOo rabalpur- in O.A.No.1452/98. If i‘he n9 as ‘rhe pefifianers in O.A.Na.1452/98, e pay: scale and seniar'ify. d, fhe wrH‘ pefi’rion s’mnds dispcsed of. 035/2066 and 1.A.Na.?425/2006 also Judge 0% W) ‘ , . 3am, WE,W amm mmWpNQnggggi 2006 W Wan mm WW mmmm -b Wmfrwm . , §?N%W3néw \ s'cmcfianed €‘o m‘her simihrly sifuweéi feachar's on acaeun? m‘ fha armar‘ af $‘he 3mm AdmmisWa‘five Tribunal dafed 31—1waQGG ‘h: whkh Eaar'md caunsef appearing for fhe S?afe/respanden‘“£ has no objec‘i‘ién Hgving heawd Qearmd aaunseE far we pam‘ies mad havirug regm'd +0 fhe facfs cmd circumsfancas af Thg 553:2, fha pmyer made by warned cmmsal far K fhe pefi‘ricmer appears 1‘0 ba jus , fair and reasonable. Therefarg, fhe paHmmr is xiiiaweici i‘a make cg demiiad repr-esam‘zriioii raising al! her griavamag fa rgspéwehi No.1 wifhin fan days {ram foday and in furn, Pespmden‘i‘ N01 shaii decide iha same wifhin 3O days from The dcd'a of ifs reseip‘i, comidering all fhe grievances raised by the peti‘rioner and faking info ascoun‘l‘ fhe order da‘l'ed 31“ Janu‘aryt 2000, passed by 'l‘he learned