HIGHCOURT OFJUDICATURECHHATTISGARH:BILASPU^'~3 £-. SinaleBench:. Hon'bte Shri S.R. NAYAK, CJ WRITPETmON N0.4949 OF 2005 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Sameer Mahilano, S/o Shri S.R. Mahilang, Aged about 24 yeans, R/o Guru Teg Bahadur Nagar,Raipur, DishictRaipur (C.G.). Versus Stateof Chhattisgarh, Through the Forest Conservator, OfRce of the Forest Conservator, Raipur ClTGle, Ralpur, District Raipur (C^. 2 TheDivisional ForestOfficer, Divisional Forest Office, Division — IVIahasamund, Mahasamund (C.G.). Fore^ District The Competent Authority/ Dy. DivisionatForestOfficer, Forest Offlce - Bagbaharti, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C^. Present: Mr. JA. Lohani, leamed counsel for thepetitioner. Mr. Sandeep Dubey, leamad Govt. Advocate for Ihe State. ORDER (Passed on 28th Ndvember 200S) The petitioner is the owner of the vellicle seized by the respondent authorities on theground thatthe vehicle was involvedintHe commfssion ofoffences punishable underthe prbvisionscfthe Indian Forest Act Having heard leamedcounaet for the parties, 1 think that ends of justice woutd be met and public iriterest would also be protactod by ll^ ^sntP10 - S •sftoa o»SE jspjo ON 'iuspuodssj pjiift eifl ya uosoejSB'es ®i|to»(A|UO puesnoqj. ^XIQ so®^OAIJ seedny) -/ooO'09'S"sa }o uune e Jio} saiuBjBno iiUBgBuiqstu.int wuogftad aq»0} losfqns oe|B pue uiq isuie6e p^miiu! sSuipasaojd uieui SL|I jo Dnssj 01 psfqns jsuosiiad sifl to Apoisna tuvaiui. aLBOi Auoj }oqfc|ns ein eseaisj o» luepuodssj pjiifl syi Buiiosjip 10 pssodsip Sj uonnscl IIJM sin 'linsgj SLB U| •tuspuodsaj mwjO uosoBtSffes e4toi (A|UO puesnoyi Apqs s^e^ aAy sesdny) -/ooo'(»"S'syy> uinse JQ( ssiuejeno i|ueg Buiysiiury jeuoiiiisd eqi oi p3?qns jsuosned sift p Aptqsno ei^ cq epiqsA psfqns ei|} Buisee|ej nqqns