- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY & INSTESTATE JURISDICTION & INSTESTATE JURISDICTION & INSTESTATE JURISDICTION jmi SUIT NO.67 OF 2002 IN PETITION NO.140 OF 2002. Govind Bhikhoobhai Patel. ..Petitioner. vs. Francis Asumption Fernandes. ..Defendant/ Caveator. .... None for the Petitioner. Mr.Robert C.Sequeira, for the Defendant. .... CORAM CORAM CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 30TH JANUARY 2009 : 30TH JANUARY 2009 : 30TH JANUARY 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This petition had appeared before this Court on 12th December 2008 [Coram : R.M. Savant, J.], when the petitioners and their Advocates were absent. The suit was, therefore, adjourned for one week. The petition thereafter again appeared on 15th January 2009 when once again the petitioner and his Advocate were absent. The petition was, therefore, adjourned to 22nd January 2009 with a direction that the suit should be shown under the caption "For Hearing and Final Disposal". The petition again appeared on 22nd January 2009 before this Court when the petitioner and his Advocate were absent. The matter was adjourned to 29th January 2009 for dismissal. On 29th January 2009, the Advocate for the petitioner as - 2 - well as the petitioner were absent. The matter was, therefore, adjourned to 30th January 2009 for dismissal, i.e. today. 2. Today, once again the petitioner and his Advocate are absent. It is therefore, clear that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition any further. The petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.] J.] J.]