IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17972 of 2009 BHOLA PRASAD SINGH, son of Late Roop Narayan Singh, resident of Village Amouja, P.S. Phool Paras, District Madhubani Versus 1. THE Vice-Chancellor,L.N.Mithila University, Darbhanga. 2. The Registrar, L.N.Mithila University, Darbhanga. 3. The Finance Officer, L.N.Mithila University, Darbhanga. 4. The Principal, K.S. College, Laheriasarai, Darbhanga. with CWJC No.17983 of 2009 MOD NARAYAN MISHRA, Son of Kari Mishra, resident of Village Raghopur, P.S. Sakari, Distt. Madhubani. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Director, Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Vice-Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Darbhanga. 4. The Registrar, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Darbhanga. 5. The Finance Officer, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Darbhanga. 6. The Principal, R.N. College, Pandaul, District Madhubani. with CWJCNo.17996 of 2009 DR.INDU BALA SHARMA, wife of Late Surendra Prasad Choudhary,resident of Mohalla Bank Road, Patna-01, Flat No.C-3, Grand Mitra Apartment, near Tara Hospital, P.S. Kotwali, District Patna. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through Secretary, Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar Darbhanga, through its Registrar. 3. The Vice-Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar Darbhanga. 4. The Finance Officer, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. 5. Principal, A.N.D. College, Shahpur, Patory, Samastipur. ----------- 2. 21.12.2009 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner of CWJC No.17972 of 2009 is permitted to correct the date of superannuation of the petitioner in paragraph 4 of the said writ 2 application. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-University as also the State. In all the above writ applications, the grievance of the petitioners is with regard to the payment of their retiral dues/ revision of pensionary benefits as well as the arrears of their salary. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- University submits that the grievances of the petitioners shall be considered as per law without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioners submit that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in these writ applications, the petitioners propose to file separate representation before the Registrar of the respondent- University with a copy to the Finance Officer. In case such separate representations with distinct claims are filed stating the details of the unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, the grievances of the respective petitioners as raised in their respective representations shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioners could be settled and the admitted dues, if any, could also be paid with statutory interest without further delay. However, if any of the claims is found not admissible, the 3 petitioners shall be informed of the same with the reasons thereof. These writ applications stand disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)