IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-36844 of 2009 Date of decision : 24.09.2010 Amrik Singh ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Ranjan Lakhanpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shilesh Gupta, D.A.G., Punjab for respondent No.1. Mr. Daleep Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned State counsel, on instruction from ASI Satwant Singh, has stated that police has already prepared and submitted the cancellation report, which is pending consideration before the Magistrate. 2. In this view of the matter, the instant petition become infructuous, which is hereby dismissed as such. 3. Needless to say that the petitioner would be at liberty to file protest petition or private complaint, as the case may be, as per law in this context. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) Judge September 24, 2010 naresh.k