[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.534 OF 2008 IN APPLN.NO.251 OF 2007 Aparna Shyam Kulkarni and Anr. ..Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.K.S.Patil advocate for applicants Mr.K.V.Saste A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. By order dated 15.2.2007, this Court granted anticipatory bail to the present applicants in CR No.156 of 2006 of Shikrapur Police Station. The applicants have executed necessary P.R.bonds and produced sureties before the police and now the case is being committed to the Court of Sessions for trial. As per the procedure, as the case is being committed to the Court of Sessions for trial, [-2-] the applicant is required to produce surety before the committal Court, however, the sureties produced by the applicants are not being accepted by the Court of the learned Magistrate, hence, the applicants have approached this Court. 3. It is seen that the order dated 15.2.2007 whereby the applicants were granted anticipatory bail, is not for a limited period i.e. till filing of the charge sheet. The order also does not say that the applicants to apply for regular bail after the filing of the charge sheet. In this view of the matter, the learned Magistrate to accept the sureties produced by the applicants provided that they are solvent sureties. 4. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]