ir ';• \,f ";;^,-:-;S!SS> ..QS' £s^zt.^'? £-;•:..OJ.^•' HIGH^QURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR flfritj'etitipiLfSLNo. 1725 of 2009 PETITIONBR RESPONDBNTS Krishan Charan Choudhary S/o Shri Murlidhar Choudhary, aged about- 62 years, Retired Head Master, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Kalenda, Block- Saraipali, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) Vs. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Accountant General, Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Block Education Officer Saraipali, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri Manoj K. Sinha, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh, Dy. Advocate General for the State/respondents No. 1 & 3 on advance copy. Shri Ajay Barik, Advocate appears on behalfofShri S.K. Beriwal, Counsel for respondent No.2 on advance copy. QRALORDER (02.04.2009) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on admission. The petitioner is a retired person. He has filed the writ petition for the following relief(s):- "10. RELIEFtSl SOUGHT :- 10.1 That the Hon'ble Court be pleased to call for the entire records in connection of the petitioner's cases. 10.2 That the HonT^le court be further pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 Accountant General, Raipur to improve/correct the G.P.F. account and released the GPF amount to the petitioner immediately. 10.3 Any other order that the Hon'ble Court deems fit and necessary in the circumstances of the case be also passed. •'.„ .••to.s' l^ Writ Petition CS1 No. 1725 of2009 10.4 That the cost of the petition be also awarded to the petitioners." During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the relief(s) claimed in the writ petition, the petitioner has filed two representations before respondent No.2, therefore, respondent No.2 may be directed to dispose of those representations and the petition may be disposed of with the above directions. The copies of the representations are Annexures-P/6 & P/7. This limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petidoner is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondents. However, they submit that some dme the copies are misplaced, therefore, the petitioner may be directed to Ele fresh copies of the representations along with all documents, which he likes to file. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that if so advised, the petitioner may file fresh copies of the representations (Annexures-P/6 6s P/7) and the documents along with any other representation, if he likes to file, before respondent No.2 within a period of three weeks froin today along with a copy of this order 8s a copy of writ petition^and if such a representation is iiled, respondent No.2 shall dispose of the same as early as possible preferably within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of representations along with the said documents. With the above observations/directions, the Writ Petition stands finally disposed of. No costs. ^_ Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti