THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2758 OF 2010 Dated 6th August, 2010 Between: B.Lakshminarayana …Petitioner And J.Manohar Rao and another …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri G.Venkat Reddy for Sri K.Rathangapani Reddy Counsel for the respondents: None appeared The Court made the following ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition arises out of order dated 19.04.2010 in I.A.No.212 of 2009 in I.A.No.1301 of 2007 in MVOP No.1266 of 2005 on the file of the learned Special Judge for Trial of Cases under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act-cum-VI-Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kurnool (for short “the Tribunal”). The petitioner filed MVOP No.1266 of 2005 claiming compensation in respect of an accident. The said O.P was dismissed on 21.01.2007 as the petitioner failed to pursue the same. The petitioner has thereafter filed I.A.No.1301 of 2007 for restoration of the O.P. As there was delay, he filed I.A.No.845 of 2007 for condonation of delay of 165 days in filing the said application. The Tribunal allowed the said application by order dated 19.11.2007 and condoned the delay subject to the petitioner paying costs of Rs.100/- and also his adducing evidence on 02.04.2008. The petitioner failed to comply with either of the two conditions and failed to appear on 02.04.2008. Subsequently, the petitioner filed I.A.No.212 of 2009 for condonation of delay of 275 days in filing an application for restoration of I.A.No.1301 of 2007. This application having been dismissed, the petitioner filed the present Civil Revision Petition. Having carefully considered the facts, I am of the opinion that the Tribunal has not committed any error in refusing to condone the delay. The repeated opportunities presented to the petitioner were not availed by him and he failed to offer convincing explanation for his failure to comply with order dated 19.11.2007. In my opinion, the petitioner does not deserve any indulgence, as he had not shown diligence in pursuing the litigation at any stage of the case. For the abovementioned reasons, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 6th August, 2010 vrn