Cl7 Mfil 'F RF^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR Wnt Petition Na ^/_1___/2006 ^^>%^ <?<6S-'^ \. ^f^spondents ^ .-<^ -QO 1/ersus /: 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Public Health & Family Welfare Department, Government of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ,'2. Government of Madhya Pradesh, through Secretary, Public Health and Family Welfare ^ft Department, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) •^v 0'^' \.o ;^v fr.' /3. Director, Health Services, Government of M.P., ^.*< ^.^ Satpuda Bhawan, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) ^'^^~. „.'. 0-" ''4. Director, Health Services, Government of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETIT10N UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 313 of2006 Petitioner Tejeshwari Prasad Shukla Versus y Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OP INDIA (SB: HouTile Shri Satish K. Agnihotn J.) Shri Aaupam Dubey, Advocate for fhe petittoner. Shri M. P. S. Bhatia, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondents. 1. 2. ORJDERttt-aB (Passed on fbis 24<t> day of Pebruaxy, 2010) Wifh ttie consent of leamed counsel appcaring for the parties the matter is heard finally. The petitioner clauns rewised pay scaJe on the basis of the circiilar dated 7th November, 1989 (Anncxiue P/2). The State Govemment in its returu dated 27,6,2006 has made it clear fhat fhe petitioner has atready been granted the revised pay scale w.e.f. 1.1.1996, ia accordance with fhe Madhya Pradesh Revision of Pay Rules (Madhya Pradesh Vetan Puarikshaa Niyam) we.f. 1.1.1996. On perusal ofthe pleadings aad docztments appended ttiereto it is not clear asto whether the petitioner has been granted revMed pay scale or not. Be that as it may, ia the facts situation, the petitioner may niake appropriate representation to fhe concemed authorily for grant of appropriate pay scale. In tura, tfae concerued authorily shaU cousider and decided the representation ia accordauce with law, withm a period ofsix weeks. With the above direction, this petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sdf- s.K. Agnihot" Juci8e 3. 4. 5. Tbakur s^ Tihi-sSxiSS^; --^-CiSi .— $&.