1 ao938.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Appeal from Order No. 938 of 2011 WITH Civil Application No. 1255 of 2011 IN AO No. 938 of 2011 Dr. Rajendra Balkrishna Tamhane ....Appellant v/s. Mr. Sanjay Champalal Chordiya & ors. ....Respondents Mr. Ashok B. Tajane for the appellant. Mr. R.N. Sanghavi for respondents 1 and 2. CORAM: R.M. BORDE, J. 28th November, 2011 PC: Heard learned Counsels appearing for the parties. I have perused the order passed by the trial Court as well as the documents. 2. Considering the description of the property given in the Sale Deed which is earlier in point of time in favour of the plaintiff dated 1st September, 2005 as well as the registered power of attorney and the subsequent Sale Deed in favour of the defendants dated 30th October, 2007 and 10th June, 2008, it appears that the same property is being transacted between the parties by executing different documents. The trial Court was justified in passing interim orders in favour of the plaintiffs. 3. No case is made out for causing interference in Appeal from Order. Appeal from Order stands dismissed. 2 ao938.11.sxw 4. In view of disposal of Appeal from Order, civil application does not survive and stands disposed of. 5. Counsel appearing for the appellant seeks stay of the order passed by this Court for further period of four weeks. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the oral request made by Counsel for appellant is rejected. (R.M.BORDE, J)