IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.4538 of 2009 Date of Decision : 12.08.2009 Gian Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus Dhian Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the trial Court on 21.7.2009, whereby an application filed by the petitioners for impleading them as party in a suit for declaration and for injunction, was dismissed. The plaintiff-respondent Nos.1 to 3 have filed a suit for declaration claiming ownership over the suit property as proprietors of the village. The petitioners also claim themselves to be proprietors of the village. If the plaintiffs have independent cause of action, it is open to the petitioners to seek the remedy, but they cannot seek impleadment in a suit, which is fixed for rebuttal. The learned trial Court has rightly declined the application, as the case of each of the proprietor is required to be examined on the basis of documents of title and also their share in the property, if any. In view thereof, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the order passed by the learned trial Court, which may warrant interference by this Court in the present revision petition. Dismissed. 12.08.2009 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE