/0 @ Q aim m‘aaw W? gamwm aim-m awara wag? Ir y. ga mam a - Tat/2000 (/W $ %a3%r mmW aimém 316 HTHT §1Ir HTHT, aaaw a mar Wag? n-g' - an‘Em ‘ram 5— n'g- mm Earn Effaa, arm—«a gmaa ’F‘c’aaam, aim am; mqrah'g- ' ‘ 2— Efrirq wrua va aim WT ’Faszrn, safqm n g /‘ AAV, :5— arwa “Ema w? Harm @mr g‘, 3mm 4— égva a‘fn’am tfima Eré am] ${ar wag? g n-y-g 5- amalm wwdz 33E, mar %m way, ‘faiar wag? 31-? — aarMiwm MM? trai 3% 3i? EMT 19 mg WT: gma‘faip arrmm amhan i935 1- mraam m Tam: :— airaw m faam Mara ma $ amiEaraaW %I gLC~\ WWMLQMWamYW 200 .mw (Wm WWW WW %€%%§ *aT-mm ‘ ER SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan smivastava, J. 05-05-2D1o Shri Chagah Lal Sagar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Agré Nal, Panel Lawyer for the State/respcndents. Heard. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submite that during the pendency of the instant petition, petitiorer has been regularized in service vide order dated 13-04—2006. In this view of the matter, iearned counsei for the petitioner submits that the petition is oecome infruotuous. Petition is therefore finally disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. On payment of usual charges certified copy be supplied by tomorrow i. e. 06-05-201 0t\m:i ’ y Sd/— y .Manindra Mohan Shrivastava l ‘ Judge