IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4549 of 2011 Date of Decision : March 15, 2011. Lipsa Aggarwal and others .....Petitioners versus Punjab State Electricity Board and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Amit Rawal, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners are General Category candidates who were appointed as Assistant Engineers by the respondent-Board and are said to have been adversely affected by an order dated 13.10.2010 passed by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.5774 of 2010 (Sukhpreet Singh and others versus Punjab State Electricity Board) (Annexure P-4). The petitioners' contention that they ought to have been heard by this Court before issuing certain directions vide the afore-mentioned order is though de-void of any merits, however, their alternative remedy that the show cause notices dated 4.3.2011 (Annexure P-5) are based upon incorrect facts, merits consideration by the competent authority. C.W.P.No .4549 of 2011 2 Since 10 days' time granted to the petitioners is expiring today, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a liberty to the petitioners to submit their representations/objections, if any, within a period of one week from today. The respondents are directed not to dispense with the petitioners' services till their objections/representations, if any, are considered and disposed of in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. March 15, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE