1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.39/2009 IN P.I.L.NO.7/2008 Ashoka Buildcon Ltd. Applicant (Res.in Vs. PIL) Changede Shashikant Premraj Respondents/Peti.in PIL) & Ors. Mr.R.S.Apte i/b Mr.A.A.Garge for applicant Mr.U.P.Warunjikar for Petitioner in PIL Mr.S.K.Srivastava for Res.1 to 3 CORAM : J.N.PATEL & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATED : 22nd APRIL,2009 P.C. . This application has been moved for clarification of order dated 1-4-2009. This Court had actually called upon the petitioner to get the issues raised in the petition examined by the committee consisting of panel of experts in respect of the subject matter of the petition in support of their case. It should not be misconstrued that such a committee which is constituted by the petitioner is vested with any jurisdiction to sit in appeal and impose itself over the authorities of the respondents. They have to work in an autonomous manner and the respondents are expected to co-operate with them. If at all the 2 committee requires any information it can obtain it under the Right to Information Act. We further clarify that the respondents and their officials are not under obligation to obey any direction,command or order of the committee. We sufficiently make it clear that the committee constituted by the petitioner is supposed to aid and assist the petitioner in making out its case before the Court. In case the committee submits a report to this Court , the petitioner will have to file it alongwith his affidavit. An opportunity would be given to the respondents to file their reply and exception to the report of the committee . The period prescribed for submitting the report of the committee stands extended till 10/6/2009. The Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. (J. N. PATEL , J ) (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J)