IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.17672 of 2009 RAMBHU RAI, son of Sri Laloo Rai @ Lal Babu Rai, resident of Village – Dharfari, P.S. – Deoriya, Distt – Muzaffarpur ………………………………. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ……… Opposite Party. ----------- For the Petitioner:- Mr. Bela Singh, Advocate. For the State:- Mr. Choubey Jawahar, A.P.P. ------------ 2. 22.05.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner has been made accused in Deoriya P.S. Case No. 36/06 registered under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section ¾ of the Explosive Substance Act. It has been stated in the first information report that the petitioner had fired at the informant but that could not hit him and in the meantime the informant fled away and that a few bombs were also exploded. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been made accused only for the reason that he had opposed the demand of rangdari from one P.D.S. dealer Karumuddin. It is further stated that Paroo P.S. Case No. 184/04 was found false by the Investigating Officer and a final form was 2 submitted by the police. In Deoriya P.S. Case No. 6/08, which was lodged under Sections 341, 323, 504 I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act by his co-villager Ajay Vishwas, the petitioner has been granted bail. Further contention is that the petitioner is in jail custody since 24.08.2008. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, namely, Rambhu Rai, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-V, Muzaffarpur in Sessions Trial No. 853/2008, arising out of Deoriya P.S. Case no. 36/06, dated 6.9.2006. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )