1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.12.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.BASHA W.P(MD)Nos.9663 and 9664 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 & 1 of 2011 1. S.Ananthian .. Petitioner in W.P.9663/2011 2. P.Ayyavoo .. Petitioner in W.P.9664/2011 Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Administration, Fort St.George,Chennai. 2.The Principal Secretary & The Commissioner of Revenue & Administration, Ezhilagam, Chennai – 5. 3.The District Collector,Madurai District, Madurai. .. Respondents in both Wps. Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents particularly the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.02.2010 and 25.08.2010 respectively in the light of the decision rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India made in appeal (civil) No.9628 of 2006, dated 08.04.2009 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law forthwith. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Palanivelayutham For Respondents: Mr.Aaiyram K.Selvakumar, Govt.Advocate COMMON ORDER The petitioners have come forward with these petitions seeking for the relief of directing the respondents, particularly the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 17.02.2010 and 25.08.2010 respectively in the light of the decision rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India made in Appeal (Civil) No.9628 of 2006, dated 08.04.2009 and pass appropriate orders. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have preferred representations as early as on 17.02.2010 and 25.08.2010 respectively, seeking for the relief regarding fixing their seniority. But till date no action has taken on the said representations and as such, the petitioners have constrained to approach this Court. It is also contended that the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Appeal (Civil).9628 of 2006 dated 08.04.2009 is also in favour of the claim of the petitioners. 3. Heard Mr.Aaiyram K.Selvakumar, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. The fact remains that the petitioner has come forward with the limited prayer, as stated above. In view of the same, this Court, without going into the merits of the representations of the petitioners, dated 17.02.2010 and 25.08.2010 respectively constrained to direct the first respondent herein to consider the representations of the petitioners, dated https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 17.02.2010 and 25.08.2010 respectively in the light of the decision rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Appeal (Civil).No.9628 of 2006, dated 08.04.2009 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5.With the above direction, these writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. SD ASST REGISTRAR(RTI ACT) /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASST REGISTRAR MPK To 1.The Principal Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Revenue and Administration, Fort St.George,Chennai. 2.The Principal Secretary & The Commissioner of Revenue & Administration, Ezhilagam, Chennai – 5. 3.The District Collector, Madurai District,Madurai. 2 ccs To The Special Government Pleader, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai in SR Nos.42913, 42914. SB:20/12/2011 2P 6C W.P(MD)Nos.9663 and 9664 of 2011 01.12.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/