IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.4591 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 26.7.2010 Radhey Sham ....Petitioner Versus Sham Lal and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Pankaj Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. There is no infirmity in the impugned order as the petitioner was granted six opportunities to lead his evidence which he did not avail of effectively. The impugned order, therefore, is totally justified in the given set of circumstances of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, contends that if only one effective opportunity is granted to him, he shall conclude his entire evidence. Having regard to the aforesaid and purely in the interest of justice, the impugned order is set aside subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- as costs and the trial court is directed to afford one effective opportunity to the petitioner. It is made clear that no further indulgence shall be shown to him under any circumstances. C.R.No.4591 of 2010 (O&M) -2- The revision petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself without issuance of notice of motion to the other side for the reason that having resorted to this process is likely to delay the proceedings further and also because of the reason that equitable justice can be ensured by compensating the other side with costs. 26.7.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss