1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.313 of 2006 Kishore Manohar Gupte, .. Applicant- Accused. Vs 1. Kishindas W Pherwani and anr .. Respondents. Mr B.A.D’Lima i/b M/s D’Lima & Associates, for the applicant-accused. Mr A.K.Ratesi, for respondent no.1 Mrs M.H.Mhatre, APP for the respondent-State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 10th August, 2006 DATED : 10th August, 2006 DATED : 10th August, 2006 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. Returnable forthwith. The learned counsel waive service for the respondents. By consent, rule is heard forthwith. 3. The learned counsel for the parties state that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the entire amount, as provided in the application under section 147 of Negotiable Instruments Act, has been paid to the complainant. The application under section 147, duly signed by the parties and their advocates, seeking permission to compound the offence under section 138, is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The undertakings given in the said application by the applicant-accused are accepted. The parties are allowed to compound the 2 2 2 offence in terms of the said application. Consequently, the the applicant-accused be released forthwith, if not required in any other case. The revision application accordingly stands disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)