IN THE HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARH) PETITIONER RESPONDENTS W. P. NOJ^^'QF 2005 t^^€. ^' ^'^w^/ ^'^' ^ ^^' ^ ~ Sushil Kumar Patel, S/o Late Deenbandhu Patel, Aged about 28 years, R/o Village Lachchanpur, Tah. Palari, Distt. Raipur [CG] V E RSU S 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur. 2. Commissioner Land Records, Chhattisgarh, Raipur [Chhattisgarh] 3. Bandobast Adhikari Raipur, Distt Raipur (CG) 4. State of Madhya Pradesh Through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal. 5. Union of India, through Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pension (State Reorganization), 3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Ddhi. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS PROHZBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERS: The petitioner, named above, most respectfully begs to submit as under: ^y" w 3Ti^i^ ^l'i^ ^^TW^T^HW | N,«», ^ ^I^R'IT %»NI<sh- '5^T r^l'41<'1^, yiTi1-H<l<o, [a)dl<y!j,< ,m..^...\^f..^^ ^n^r TT^R' (^f^^) ^H^T? ^?f?^ 3?I^¥[ <^j^(<n<41i T^^f "^f fa^l <f^i^!< ^3iRW 37T^T S.B: MON'BLE JUST3CE_jV3R^PEIT!IM|SE_RDiVyAKEK 2A-08-20©8; Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, c<| Shri Yashwnat Singh State/respondents No. 1, 2 & 3. ShrjRajeev Shrivastava, ej Shri KashifShakeei, counj ^unsel for the petitioner. Fhakur, Dy. Advocate Genera! for the [ounse! for respondent No. 4. ^e! for respondent No. 5. With the consent ofthe pairties, the matter is heard flnaiiy. Case of the petitioner is ISiat his father late Deenbandhu Patei had died on 16.4.2000 and the comp^issionate appointment has been deniecyo the petitioner on the basis ofthe|poiicy dated 10.6.2003 according to which the cut off date which was aj)plied by the State Government was of 1.11.2000, Counsel for the petition^r submits that subsequentiy, the State Government has made an amen the said policy now the State G< pment in the policy cn 2.2/2006 and as per ^yernment is considering the cases where the death had taken place after | .11.1997 onwards; therefore he is entitied for compassionate appointment. Counsel for the State do^s not dispute above factual position of the case, he submits that let the p^titloner makes a fresh representatlon and the same would be consider^d afresh by the State Government in accordance with existing policy. Accordingly, the writ peti|ipn is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to flle fresh applicatlon competent authority within four further period of four months accordance with law. along with the copy of thls order before the ^eeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same would be d^cided by the authorities concerned within a from the date of its recelpt strictly in Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge