IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15452 of 2010 Radha Krishan Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, II, Gurgaon and another Present: Mr.S.P.Chahar, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner was appointed as Mate (Beldar) on daily wages on 16.11.1988. On 7.3.1993, the services of the petitioner were terminated. The petitioner along with three other co-workers filed CWP No.15693 of 1993, which was disposed of on 13.7.1994 with direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularisation and to take him back into service if he fulfilled the requisite conditions. The claim of all the petitioners in the said writ petition was declined. Aggrieved against the same, they filed a contempt petition. Though the other co-petitioners were directed to be reinstated but the petitioner was not reinstated. His services were also not regularised on the ground that he had not completed 240 days in one year. The petitioner had remained absent for more than one month continuously and as such was not found eligible for being regularised. Three years thereafter, the petitioner served a demand notice leading to the present reference. The reference was also adjudicated in the year 2004 and has now been decided. Once the petitioner could not succeed in his claim for regularisation despite having approached this court, the Labour Court would not have been in any competent position to pass different order. Otherwise also, it is noticed that the petitioner was a daily Civil Writ Petition No.15452 of 2010 : 2 : wager and had not been appointed by following the rules and regulations and hence he was not entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service. I do not find any reason to interfere in the impugned award. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. August 30, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE