‘/‘tup IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR(CHHATTI$GARH) WRIT PETITION NO. {92.33—4001 UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA l BLA PETITIONER: Ajay Mendhekar,s/o Late Shanker Rao“ MEndhekar, aged 45 years,occupation Service Senior Telecom office Assistant,0ffice of General Manager,Telecom District Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Bilaspur,r/o Rajendra Nagar Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) RESPONDENTS: l. Union of India,through Secretary Govt. of India,Ministry of Communication, Sanchar Bhawan New Delhi Dr. D.P.S.Seth,Chairman Cum 2. Managinng Director Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,Sanchar Bhawan,New Delhi Mallikarjun,5ecretary General, Bharati Telecome Employees Federation, New Delhi K. Vallinayagam,Secretary General, Federation of National Telecom Organization,New Delhi a O,P.Gupta,Secretary¢General, National Federation of Telecom Employees Dada Ghosh Bhawan, New Delhi VERS US JUDGE. _ M? WW hLPV‘Nn-lg Ln>o\r WW 200 W . W: mz‘w JUDGE. mmmw WWW§VWW aqafanm 30052003 Shri V.C.OttalWar with Shn' Petitionar. \ Shri V.V.S. 'Murthv, Addit Counsal for respondent no. 1 and 2. Heald‘on I.A.No.r4753/O3 ant In View of the\ prayer made t hearing during the vacau'on, this m Accordingly, LA. N0s.4753] 0 disposed of. The petition is directed against the abtionof respondent no. 1 :titioner for his absorpu'on in are of the " service conditions iyer made by the petitioner was 01 and the process of taking ted to be suspended during the .‘ is now the submission of the 3e conditions have been made )mit an option and accordingly to withdraw this writ petition her side has no objection. asonable and accordingly the "thdraw this Lonal Central Govt. Stahding" in asking‘for option from the pt B.S.N.L. without being made aw prevailing in BSNL, The interim pn accepted Vide order dated 15.2.2C option from the petitioner was direc pendency of the present petition. I i writ petitioner that since the servil known to him he is prepared to su] 3he prays that he may be permitted ‘With liberty to give an option. The \ot The prayer seems to. be re petitioner is permitted to W1 iConsequently, the interim order date \ Alok Bakshi counsel for the . I.A.Nov4752/03, hat the matter be taken up for atter is taken up; 3 and I.A.No.4752/O3 stand x writ petition. :d 15.03.2001 stands vacated. x [view wa XI-HC-22 " R WW Mme; 132/ an] mm K mzm ‘mmatm _2‘- The petitioner may now s petitioner submits his option by considered and decided by the depa Accordingly, this wn't pctitk ’ with the liberty aforesaid. Cons1 stands disposed of. (1C. as per rules, L-r e WW1§§€IW €63T1‘‘vvmam ubmit the option and if the 5th June 2003 that shall be rtment on its own merits. m is dismissed as withdrawn :quently, M.W.P.No.36/2003 A Sd/— P.C-Naik Judge I"/’ ,. ..