IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 18531 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION : 17.10.2011 Dayanand .... PETITIONER Versus Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present: Mr. Jitender Nara, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. ( Oral ) In the impugned order dated 18.5.2011 (Annexure P-2), passed by the Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak (respondent No.1), exercising the powers of the Director Consolidation, Haryana, it has been specifically mentioned that the petitioner was proceeded ex-parte on 4.5.2011. The case of the petitioner is that this observation in the impugned order is totally incorrect. Actually, he was never made a party in those proceedings and no notice was ever issued to him. In view of this position, we are of the opinion that the petitioner should first approach the Director Consolidation, Haryana, by moving an application that he was never proceeded ex-parte. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner CWP No. 18531 of 2011 -2- states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to move necessary application before the Director Consolidation, Haryana. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE October 17, 2011 ( PARAMJEET SINGH ) ndj JUDGE