1 wp2702.11 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2702 OF 2011 Sanjay Patil Yadravkar & ors. .. Petitioners. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors. .. Respondents. Mr. M. L. Patil, advocate for petitioners. Mr. S. N. Patil, AGP for respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4. Mr. Ashok R. Verma, advocate for respondent No. 2(UOI). Mr. T.S. Ingale & Mr. N.Y. Chavan, advocate for respondent No. 6. Mr. V.P. Sawant, advocate for respondent No. 7. CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C. J. AND GIRISH GODBOLE, J 1 August 2011 P.C. : 1. The learned counsel for the respondent No. 6 seeks leave to place on record copy of the letter-cum-receipt dated 25/7/2011 signed by the partners of the respondent No. 7 M/s. Kamal Trading Company acknowledging the receipt of the amount of Rs. 1,05,00,000/- (Rs. One crore five thousand only) in full and final settlement of dues of respondent No. 7 from respondent No. 6 under the Decree dated 5/7/2006 of the National Consumer Disputes 2 wp2702.11 Redressal Commission, New Delhi in Original Petition No. 171 of 1998 and any other transaction with respondent No. 6 Kolhapur Jilha Shetkari Vinakari Sahakari Soot Girani Ltd. In view of the above, leave as prayed for is granted. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent No. 7 states that in view of the above settlement, the respondent No. 7 has no claim against the present petitioner who are office bearers of the respondent No. 6 and against the respondent No. 6. 3. In view of the above development, nothing further survives in the petition. As there is full and final settlement of all the claims between the respondent No. 6 and respondent No. 7, there will be no question of execution of the Decree passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi against the respondent No. 6 or its office bearers or the petitioners who are office bearers. Accordingly, consequential order dated 11/3/2011 in Execution Application No. 19/2007 in Original Petition No. 171 of 1998 at Exh. T to the petition issued by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi is set aside. Petition accordingly, allowed iin the above terms. 3 wp2702.11 4. It is clarified that this order is passed on the joint request of all the parties concerned. CHIEF JUSTICE GIRISH GODBOLE, J