IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO : 519 of 2002 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 21/02/2002 in WP No : 579 of 2002 on the file of the High Court.) Between: T.Ramakrishnam Raju W/o.appala Narasimha Raju R/o.Gajapatinagaram Vizianagaram District ..... APPELLANT AND 1 G.Sreenivasa Rao S/o.Sivarama Deekshitullu r/o.Gajapatinagaram.Licencee of Sri Laxmi Wines Puritipenta Village,Gajapatinagaram Mandal Vizianagaram District 2 Govt of Andhra Pradesh Revenue(Excise-III) Department rep.by its Officer on Special Duty Secretariat Hyderabad 3 The Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise Govt.of A.P Hyderabad 4 The Prohibition & Excise Superintendent Vizianagaram ..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.S.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.T.NAGESWARA RAO The Court made the following : HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN W.A.No.519 of 2002 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T .Meena Kumari) Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the cause in the Writ Appeal has become infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellant, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. _____________________ T.MEENA KUMARI,J Date:23-07-2008 ____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J GS/ ASP