IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17650 of 2010 MD. NIZAMUDDIN ANSARI @ NEZAMUDDIN ANSARI @ NAUSHAD ANSARI Versus 1. The STATE OF BIHAR 2. Saleha Parveen ------ 5/ 07.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Torture for demand of dowry is the allegation. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that complainant is not willing to reside with this petitioner. There is no need of further corroboration as rejection order itself speaks about desire of the complainant that she was not willing to reside with this petitioner. Taking that into consideration, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 1549 of 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)