^h Sin<^. ^encl ^1 z") IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.No.^S33>/ 2004 Petitioner 7 Dr.Ravi Kumar Gore, S/o Late P.R.Gore Aged about 55 years^Block Medical Qfficer, Commurdly Health Centre, Balod, Dist. Durg (C.G.) Versus Respondents : /1 State of Cbhatti^garh through Secretary, ^ Healfh and Paimly Welfare Departmeat, DKS Bhavaa, Raipur ^? ^* 2 Director, Health Senricea, Govt. of .-s y. Chattisgarh, Raipur. 3 , Caiirf Ifodical Pfacer, Conunzuuty Health Centre, Balod, Dist. Durg(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/ 227 OF THE A CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ~S^ ^{WW^, ^T\iW\^, M<rll^^< , IAJ.^MO- ^t3^5/^^^- ^f^T XR^ (^qf^^T) 311^1 ^T^W ^T ^T^T^iN? ^0-11-2004 Shji P, Diwakar, Couxisel for ^N^frT ^RTH^! ^ ft^zt "(f^K '^^JfHH^T^T [fhe petitioner. Shri Akhil Agrawal, Paael La^ryer for tiie State. Application for iirgent hearinfe is aUowed, Heaid. Leamed counsel for the pe|litioxier submits tfaat fhe matter jrclates to transfer of fhe petition^r. He further submits fhat fhe t)etitioner has been transferred fix>|ii fhe CommiiEiity Healfh Centre, palod, District Dui^g to Primaiy j Healfh Centre, Jhalap, Distdct jMlahasamuiid vide order dated 26-^0-2004 (Aniiexure-P/1). He also ^ubmits that fhe Communily Heal|Ji Centre at Balod, Dlstrict Dtirg |ias been converted iato First Re|Terral Uait (FRU) and titie place ^herc the petitioner has been tran^ {Jhalap, District Mahfi^amund is n<|>t a First Referral Unit (FRU), He ^lso submit^ tbat ^ petifeioaer flaestiaesia for 120 days aad he| ferrcd i.e, Pximaiy Healfh CSentine, has beea giveii fhe trmnmg of has eompleted his toaiamg on {^/8/2004, Aimexure-P/2 is fhe c^py of certificate to tfais effect He ^lso submits fhat the transfer ordjer of fhe petitioner is completely ^olitfcalty motivated, He also six ^etitioner may be givea aa op^rtimity of filia^ tfae detailed l^epreseiitation beforc fhe competej bmits that fi» llie prcsent tfae Eit authority of tfae respondente, l^hich shan be considered on its owb merits m accordaace wifh law, Haviag considercd aad withojut expressing aoy opinion on the ^nerits offhe case, m fhe opimon o^fhis Ck)iirt, ends ofjustice wSl be ^erved if a directioa is given to t|ie petitioner to make a detailed G -50,000. ^£— (^) ^^ ^{<q}^q, ^Tl1^-i}(o, [®l<ril<4^< ^>^^0. ^200 ^^ ^?^ (^fg^T) 311^1 ^T^PF m7T^?^T^^NT -L Gowri '^nw^n^Tr^i ^_^ representation raisiag his grievaQjces before fhe coiiipetent authority of the rcspondents along wifli a <j wifhia 15 days^ and on sucli own merits m accoidance with Ij withdn two monfhs ficom fhe date <| ^T^M^T ^TFT^ ^ 1^^ <i^^k ^^rH3T^r sopy of fhe petition aaid tfais ordery representation being fited, fhe competent auffaority of fhe respo^deHts shall decide fhe same 011 its aw as earty as possible preferably f receipt of fhe rcpreseatation. Learaed counsel for fhe pe^itioner submits fhat fhe petitioaer has not been rcUeved. He prays tit^at the petitioiier may be allowed to coiitio.ue. It is directed Ifaat if fhe peSitioner has not been rclieved aad ofher person has not jomed in pl^Be of the petitioiier, fhe pelitioxier may be aUowed to continue tUl tijie rciMpesentation is decided, It is made clesr that if the petitioner |ias already been relieved or other person has already joiaed mi ptei^pe of fhe petitioaer, fhis order will not entifle tfae petltioner to rejoia ^t fhe earlier plaee ofposting, Wifh fhe aforesaid obsjgrvations, fbis petitioii stexxds disposed pf, Consequentty M.W.P.No.46^3/2004 also stands disposed of, Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge GRPRJ—FS/350— 12/2000—50,000. >. ^-'