THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA W.P.NO.19142 OF 1996 Dt.3.1.2006 Between: Ch.Pamulu … Petitioner And The Managing Director, A.P.S.R.T.C., Hyderabad and another … Respondents ORDER: On 2.1.2006, when the writ petition has come up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner was absent and there was no representation on his behalf. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed on 3.1.2006 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing none appears for the petitioner and there is no representation on his behalf. In the circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed for default/non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _______________ (N.V.RAMANA, J.) 3.1.2006 kpr/grk