IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH MAY 2011 / 4TH JYAISHTA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 3762 of 2011 -------------------------------- CRIME NO.561/2010 OF TANUR POLICE STATION CMC.522/2011 of DISTRICT COURT, MANJERI CMP.1669/2011 of J.M.F.C.,PARAPPANANGADI .................... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED 1,2 ------------------------------- 1. NISAMUDHEEN @ NISSAM, PUTHUKKUDI HOUSE, PARAMMAL, KOTTAKKAL AMSOM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. RISHAD @ MOHAMMED RISHAD, S/O.MOHAMMED, PILATHOTTATHIL HOUSE, MUNDUMUZHI, VAZHAKKAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.SAMSUDIN RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------- THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TANUR, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. .................................................... Bail Application No.3762 of 2011 ..................................................... Dated this the 25th day of May, 2011 ORDER Petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.561/2010 of Tanur Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 379 read with 34, seek their enlargement on bail. The petitioners were arrested on 17.12.2010. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application contending, inter alia, that the petitioners were found engaged in theft of motor bike and the charge sheet has already been filed before the J.F.C.M, Parappanangadi. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioners and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioners are released on bail, they will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) sj