1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.7095 OF 2007 PETITION NO.7095 OF 2007 PETITION NO.7095 OF 2007 Rukmanidevi Bhagwandas Taliwal : Petitioner versus Mr.Pravin Devichand Mutha, and others. : Respondents Mr.D.B.Shukla i/by Ajay K. Rao for the petitioner. Mr.H.Toor i/by Nandu Pawar for Respondent No.1. CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.A.BOBDE, J. : S.A.BOBDE, J. : S.A.BOBDE, J. DATED DATED DATED : OCTOBER 05, 2007. : OCTOBER 05, 2007. : OCTOBER 05, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. Rule, returnable forthwith. Taken up for final hearing by consent of the parties. 2. There is no reason to interfere with the 2 impugned order which merely dismisses the revision on the ground that the order of competent authority is a procedural order granting leave to defend. Indeed any observation made by the competent authority and the revisional authority shall be restricted to the purpose of granting leave to defend and shall not influence the final decision of the respondents’ application. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. [S.A.BOBDE,J] [S.A.BOBDE,J] [S.A.BOBDE,J]