yo IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (Sl No. /2009 PETITIONER 1. Pradeep Kumar Sahu, S/o. Shri Jamuna Sahu, aged about 31 ...'sC^' <•• ,!^ v^.--'' ...' \°/^^\/r ^.••^xz^ ^ '//^v, ^>^\rx-"> ^years, Working as Sub /•''.^A'f7<>' ^'''^' .^' .?' .*' .••' .w~ .-•' .-l!? •..,-• c'p ^ Engineer, Janpad Panchayat, (Office of Chief Executive Officer) Lailunga, Post LaUunga, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1) ' State of Chhattisgarh through : Secretary, Departruent of Panchayat and rural developinpnt D.K.S Bhawan, Raipiir (C.G.) 2)' The Additional Secretary, Department of Panchayat and niral Developnient, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3) Chhattisgarh Rural Developraenjt Authority through: Chi^| '^1; Executive Officer, Lailunga Dista-ict Raigarh (C.G.) d> 4) Superintendent Engineer, Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojna Of&ce of Vikas Ayukta, Raipur (C.G.) 5) The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Lailunga, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ART1CLE&2,%6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -Mu .i.,^/ ::•^"^•"'^"•i^^•B:UJi-^ :l-li<SHI<GOU:RT'.<3E:'SHt-IATT)gi3ftRH'A;Bffi.ASPUR: l"F^i3e"ri"i'i0N.(S)'N®.39SQ;QF2QO^ PETFTIGNB State of.Chhattisgarh & Others • (Writ Petition ynder,Si-ticfe:22( ISingl&Behciis¥B6n'btsithi ai°the'Constitution af india}1 i:Sqtish?K.:Agnihotri,/J.:^ Present:- Ms. HaFnidaSiddique, Advocateforthe petitioner., . Shri Y.S, Thakur, Dy.' Adv. Generai with Shri P.K. Bhaduri, .::- Panet Lawyerforthe.State.:l: .':; ; ' ' • ::". , :;' 'ORB@R.f( {Rasssd'ohthis9"'day6f By this pelition, the petiticiner seeks to chaiieng^ the legaiity ahd validityiOftheoroerciated29-6-2Q£®(Arm©(ure whereunder^the petitioner^h,as •beeh'^sent.on; •department;<?f:Praahai-('BSafriii©tanT::Sad;aK^ojria. The^facts,::|;in'.:-.nj.ttsheU^';'ai-|B:Sttjit order:dated 17-9-2008 (Ann^ure-f:^.^Thereaftei',byiiinElpugrieel order dated^29-®-2QQ&.tti&:petitioneF'hasbeen';sent onide|Sufat(Qn to the departmeniof'Pradhan l^antri'.Gram Sadak Ypjna^with^iut obtaining co;nsent of ths.pstittoner. ;.Thus,4his,^qtition. •Leamed caynsBi'apReanng.i'iprlHe.St^e^pn^nsiTuetioris., that ,admJttediy^tRe petitiorierL was'Dpsfejd.pn 1 tieputation :JB 'th departFnent;5Rf:Pradhanfr!Wantii:,Gi[am]:SsKiaj< : G<»/ernment;has'ldBeKJect:fg;dr df acopy:6ftiiis:oiXier.,''?;'v'1',.' ' Ai: this^ •Juncture,;, learneci^'.counsei'':: ap|p8aring^| -^' sybmits'that' in'th^'.iight' oi;^ear'an<ll'< by1eamed'couns^;;aDp®arine(.l'oi^'tiis,jStiaSe,;:notil teconjJngiy^th&WHt. Gowri i:yi),wKerebyahd to:.the !t6fRis' tiia'date-iSf; submissiiiSM'iBnadte ng.survj'ias-.ifi Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge :'l ].g •^l .^[''iiii