(—>1~\B-€1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON fSl N0. (-300 /2Q11 ,.„ ^ PETITIONER /'^v-',.**** -^ ^-;: Rohit Kumar Patel S/o- Shri Shiv Prasad ^ Patel, aged about- 38 years, Occupation- Shikshakarmi Grade- II, presently posted at Govt. Girls Higher Secondary School- Khadgao, Block, Tahsil- Dharamjaigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS \.^ The State bf Chhattisgarh, Through- the Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) '^•^^ •!;'-^S-^' 2. The Dirertor, Department . of Public Instruction, Sanchanalaya, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 3. -" The Collector, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 4. The District Education Officer, Raigarh, Distrid- Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE - 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/DIRECTION ETC. '^ HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRiT PETSTSON (S) N0.1900 OF 2Q11 (Writ Petitlon under Singie Bench: Versus The StateofChhattisi ;!e 226 ofthe Constituti ble Shri Satish K. Agni Presenf :- Shri Roop Naik, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Pane! La-A'yer Tor the State. 2. 4. 5. (Passed on By this petition, the ®ER{'ORAU iis8tndayofApri!,2011) to appoint the petitioner on the post of Hsad Master, Primary School. Learned counsel aooearina for the Detitioner submite that several other oersons. who have obfained lesser rnarks than the Detitioner, have been prorrioted and appointed on the post of Head Master, PrimarySchool. It has been brought to the notice of this Court bv the learned State counsei that the identical issue is pending consideration before this Court. Thus, the order passed by the District Educstion Officer, Raiaarh that case of the petitioner for aoDOintment shall be considered onlv on decision of this Court, where the other matiers regarding seiection process are pending, on instruction of the State Govemment. In that event no direction can be issued to appoint the petitioner, when the dispute is pending consideration before this Court in a batch of matters. The letter dated 23/12/2010 (Annexure P/1) of Disfrict Education Officer, Raiaarh. aDpears to be just and proper and does not warrant any interference of this Court at this stage. In view ofthe above. the writ Detition is dismissed. Arun Satish K. Agnihotn Judge