IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M.No.30942/2010(O&M) Date of decision:8.11.2010. Gurmeet Chand and another ....................Petitioner v. Nadar Khan and others. .....................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present: Mr.Padamkant Dwivedi,Advocate for the petitioner. Jaswant Singh.J.(Oral) Present revision petition is directed against the orders dated 12.11.2009 passed by learned JMIC, whereby the petitioners were charge sheeted under Sections 323, 342,506,148,149 IPC and the order dated 19.8.2010 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, (FTC)Ropar, whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioners was dismissed and the order dated 12.11.2009 passed by the learned JMIC, was upheld. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that revisional court on the same set of allegations has discharged co- accused Bhupinder Kumar @ Kochhi and Gopal while upholding the framing of charges against accused petitioners. It is thus, contended that the order passed by the revisional court cannot be sustained. After hearing the learned counsel I find no ground to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.PC., which amounts to second revision. Learned revisional Court after perusal of material placed on record has found that there is no evidence available on record to proceed against Bhupinder Kumar @ Kochhi and Gopal whereas there is sufficient material on record which raises grave suspicion to proceed against the petitioners. In view of the findings recorded by the learned trial Court and upheld by the revisional court, no ground for interference is made out. Dismissed. 8.11.2010 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge