IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1182 of 2010 Date of Decision:19.7.2010 Balwinder Singh .....Petitioner Versus Baldev Raj and another ..….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Shri Sandeep Pawar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) The grievance of the petitioner is that though the defendant-respondents have made statement before the Civil Court on 8.10.2002 that they will neither interfere nor raise any construction over the disputed land, but still the defendants have started interfering in the possession of the plaintiff over the land in dispute. A perusal of the records shows that the petitioner has withdrawn his suit on 20.1.2003. Thus there was no executable decree granted in favour of the petitioner. The question whether there is any violation of the undertaking given by the respondents is a disputed question of fact, which cannot be adjudicated in the contempt petition. The petitioner is at liberty to avail of his alternative remedy as may be available to the petitioner in accordance with law. Dismissed with liberty aforesaid. [ HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 19-07-2010 ds