CR.MPM No.264/2010. 12.5.2010 Present: Mr. Anshul Bansal, Addl. Advocate General, for the State. Mr. Vinay Thakur, Advocate for the respondents. This is an application seeking leave to file an appeal against the acquittal. Heard and gone through the record of Learned Trial Court. The allegations on which the respondent faced trial can be summarized thus. Admittedly, the parties are in the litigation in respect to khasra No.706/517 owned by the wife of the complainant Smt. Urmila Devi. The complainant is alleged to have taken the demarcation of the said land, the boundaries thereof were fixed which are alleged to have been destroyed by the respondents. The respondent in the suit filed against the complainant got status quo qua stay, the accusation that the respondents had criminally trespassed into the land aforesaid and restrained the complainant and his wife and destroyed the boundary marks and intentionally insulted and criminally intimidated the complainant are not well founded particularly when the respondents have claimed their possession. Further, there is also no evidence on record with respect to the raising of boundary land marks under the direction of some public authority. Therefore, in these circumstances leave to appeal can not be granted, as such, the application is dismissed. May 12, 2010 (Surinder Singh), J. (VS)