IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21039 of 2010 ZAKIR @ BHUTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 25.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 461 and 379 of the Penal Code is of being named in the F.I.R. for shop breaking on suspicion when there has been no recovery from his conscious possession but from the river side and custody since 6.1.2010. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Sikrahana at Motihari in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 01 of 2010. The photographs and proof of residence of the bailors shall be appended to the bail bonds which shall be verified through the local police before final acceptance, till which date the petitioner is directed to remain physically present in the Court. If he absconds during trial, the Court below shall be at liberty to proceed appropriately against the sureties also, if the circumstances so warrant. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)