1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICMTURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 3848 of 2007 Eknath v. State of Maharashtra and anr ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr N.S. Badhe, Adv for petitioner. Mr S.B. Ahirkar, AGP for respondents. Coram : D.K. Deshmukh and Prasanna B. Varale, JJ Dated : 19th November 2008 Heard Mr N.S. Badhe, learned counsel for the petitioner. The Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal has correctly appreciated the facts and law. Petitioner did not challenge the promotions which, according to the petitioner, were given contrary to Rules. What he was claiming is, as others have been illegally promoted, similar illegality should be done in his case. The Tribunal, relying on the judgment of the Supreme Court in State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Prasad Singh reported in AIR 2000 SC 2306, has rightly rejected that contention. 2 There is no substance in the petition. It is accordingly rejected. Judge. Judge. hsj