1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.3492/2006 ( Late Sheshrao Patil Ginning & Pressing Sahakari Society Maryadit, Pusad -: versus :- Sudhakarrao Naik Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Maryadit, Pusad ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri R.E. Mohrir, Adv. for petitioner. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JULY 15, 2010. Co-operative Court and also Appellate Court have concurrently found that amount allegedly advanced was not in accordance with the scheme or business of the respective societies and hence dispute under section 91 was not maintainable. Adv. Shri Mohrir is seeking time to show certain case laws. However, as the concurrent findings on fact are not demonstrated to be perverse, and no legal provision to indicate the scope of business is shown, it is apparent that the appreciation of case laws in this respect is not necessary. Writ petition is pending before this Court since 2006. Learned counsel states that petitioner has applied to the Deputy Registrar in January 2010 seeking leave to continue with proceedings for recovery against the respondent which has gone in liquidation. The petitioner can prosecute said proceedings and can also take recourse to other remedies for recovery of its alleged dues in accordance with law. Writ petition is therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE Tambaskar.