1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10107/2008 (Sana Devi Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) Date of order :: 19.12.2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.Vipin Makkad, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is in possession of the land in dispute and his application for regularization is pending before the respondents, even then, a notice for dispossession has been given to the petitioner. In my opinion, petitioner is first required to satisfy the respondents. No interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is required. However, if any representation will be filed by the petitioner, then the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. With these observations/directions, this writ petition is disposed of. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. A.K. Chouhan/- A.K. Chouhan/-