IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18112 of 2009 1. ASHOK KUMAR, SON OF CHANDRIKA SINGH. 2. ALOK KUMAR, SON OF CHANDRIKA SINGH. 3. AJIT KUMAR, SON OF CHANDRIKA SINGH. 4. ARJUN SINGH, SON OF RAMBHAJAN SINGH 5. SHALIGRAM SINGH, SON OF RAMDHIR SINGH. ALL ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-SISBAR, P.S.-KHIJARSARAI, DISTRICT-GAYA. 6. MUNI SINGH, SON OF NOT KNOWN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- COHIRAMA, P.S.-SHERGHATI, DISTRICT-GAYA. ……..PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. MAYA DEVI, WIFE OF RAM EKBAL SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SISBAR, P.S.-KHIJARSARAI, DISTRICT-GAYA. ----------- 3 15.03.2011 The petitioners have challenged the order taking cognizance dated 17.06.2008 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Gaya in Complaint Case No.1417 of 2007 whereby cognizance has been taken under Sections 341, 323, 504, 379, 354/34 of I.P.C. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the husband of the complainant is accused under Section 302 of the I.P.C. in which the petitioner no.2 is informant. The other complaint was also filed by petitioner side against the complainant and present complaint has been filed as retaliatory measure. The present application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to raise all their contention at the time of framing of charge and it is expected from the learned court below to consider the fact that the present complaint appears to have been filed as retaliatory measure with above observation the application is disposed off. PN ( Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)