Crl.M.No.M-27580 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-27580 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:October 14, 2010 Bunty .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.GBS Dhillon, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.49203 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-27580 of 2010 The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.61, dated 15.5.2010, under Sections 307, 324, 323, 452, 342, 506, 511, 148, 149 IPC, registered at Police Station City SBS Nagar (Nawanshahr), District SBS Nagar. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully, including the impugned order passed by learned Sessions Judge, SBS Nagar, vide which application filed on behalf of the present petitioner for anticipatory bail was dismissed. Brief allegations against petitioner-accused are that he alongwith co-accused while armed with deadly weapons entered the house of the complainant and caused injuries to the complainant and other family members. Specific role has been attributed to the petitioner-accused. He was armed with a daang and gave injury on the head of the complainant. Petitioner-accused also threw red chilli powder on the faces of complainant and other family members due to which the complainant could not see. On Crl.M.No.M-27580 of 2010 (O&M) -2- the similar facts, bail application of co-accused, namely, Prem, has also been dismissed by a coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 16.8.2010 passed in Crl.M.No.M-22699 of 2010. There are serious allegations against the petitioner-accused. It is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused. Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Bunty for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 14.10.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge