The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.8794 of 2005 Dated 9th July, 2010 Between: Mohd.Tajammul Hussain …Petitioner And The District Educational Officer, Adilabad District, Adilabad and 3 others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.P.V.Ramana Counsel for the respondents: GP for Education The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not renewing the recognition for the Classes (1 to 5) to the petitioner Educational Society i.e. Anwar Urdu High School, Khagaznagar, Adilabad District, on the ground of pendency of the Correspondentship dispute and not taking any action for settlement of the Correspondentship in spite of submitting detailed report by the Enquiry Officer dt. 15 th, 19th and 20th of November, 1999 and directing the Deputy Educational Officer Luxettipet, for countersigning the bills of aided Teachers for the purpose of drawing salaries as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequentially to declare that the petitioner is entitled to continue as correspondent of the petitioner Educational Society i.e. Anwar Urdu School Educational Society, Khagaznagar, and also entitled for renewal of recognition for primary school section and High School Section not-with standing resolving the dispute of the Correspondentship which is pending before the authorities for the last more than 4-1/2 years.” At the hearing, Sri P.V.Ramana, learned Counsel for the petitioner, realising that the School, in respect of which the relief of minority status is claimed in the Writ Petition, is not made party to this Writ Petition, sought for permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh Writ Petition with the permission and in the name of the said School. The request of the learned Counsel is accepted and the Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.11612 of 2005, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 9th July, 2010 lur