IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND SIX P R E S E N T THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA * * * WP.No.11033 of 2006 Between: A.Lingam, s/o. Ramulu, aged about 35 years, Occ. Busines, r/o. H.No.4-1-86, Srinagar Colony, Nacharam, Hyderabad. … Petitioner Versus The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Town Planning Section, Secunderabad Division … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri A.M. Rao (6533) Counsel for the Respondents: Smt.G.Jyothi Kiran O R D E R : The writ petition is filed to declare the impugned notice issued by the respondent in Lr.No.232/TPMCH/SD/2005-06 dated 26-6-2006 under section 636 of Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act as arbitrary, violative of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act and Article 14 of the Constitution of India and pass such other suitable orders. In the facts of the case, the impugned notice to be treated as show cause notice and the petitioner is at liberty to raise necessary objections if any within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order and the respondent to consider the objections and pass appropriate orders in this regard. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. June 26th, 2006. ---------------------------- I s L. P . S . NARAYANA , J