FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WP/3022/2001 MADHAV SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL HATNI V/S STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... 1. None present for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for respective respondents. 2. On 23.8.2010, the matter was adjourned at the request of learned AGP. We have seen from the petition that the petitioner had earlier moved this Court by filing Writ Petition No.4135 of 2000. Grievance at that time was that proposal for permission to start a new senior college for Commerce and Science at village Umari was submitted by the petitioner. However, it was pending with respondent University right from October 1999. This Court had passed an order in that Writ Petition in October 2000 directing respondent No.3 to consider the proposal for necessary recommendation to the State government on its own merits and further directed the State Government to decide the said proposal expeditiously and in any case before 31.5.2001. 3. Present petition is filed on 20.6.2001. It appears that after disposal of earlier petition, the petitioner applied to the Education Department or granting permission. Respondents, however, granted permission to run the college at Umari in favour of respondent No. 4. Said order is challenged in this petition Petitioner seeks to quash orders at Exhibits "A" and "B". In the facts and circumstances of the FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS present case, in our opinion, orders impugned cannot be said to be per se illegal, to be intereferred with in the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. We do not find any merit in the Writ Petition. 4. In the result, Writ Petition is dismissed. Rule stands discharged. No order as to costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.) Dt.15.9.2010 akl