IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 24513 of 2008 Between: Vattikuti Sita Ratnam @ Venkata Laxmi W/o. Late Venkata Rayudu R/o. Muramanda Village, Kadiyam Mandal, East Godavari Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Gram Panchayat Rep. by its Panchayat Secretary Muramanda, Kadiyam Mandal, East Godavari Dist. 2 The Tahsildar Kadiyam Mandal, East Godavari Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in seeking dispossess the petitioner from her land to an extent of Ac.3.00 cents in Sy.No.362 of Muramanda Village, Kadiyam Mandal, East Godavari Dist. without issuing any notice or passing any order as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Art.14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and Consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from her land mentioned above without following due process of law in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.M.PRABHAKARA RAO The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 24513 of 2008 ORDER: It has been represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequent to the filing of the present writ petition, the petitioner has filed another writ petition and by virtue of the disposal of the said writ petition, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA,J DATE: 4th June, 2009 pnb