WP(C) 1871/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. U. Bhuyan, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Mr. M. Sarma, learn ed counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. R. Chokraborty, learned Addl. Sr. G ovt. Advocate appearing for the State respondents. I have also heard Mr. R. Sing ha, learned Standing counsel, BTC. The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure- VI notification dated 11.02.201 1 by which many officers including the petitioner have been transferred to diffe rent places of posting. The petitioner has been transferred from Titabar, Jorhat to Parbotjora (BTC). In terms of the said order dated 11.02.2011 all the office rs stood released. The petitioner is also aggrieved by Annexure IX order dated 2 5.03.2011 issued by the Sub-Divisonal Officer (C), Titabar releasing the petitio ner so as to enable him to join at the new place of posting. According to the petitioner, once the Model Code of Conduct issued by th e Election Commission of India has come into effect the petitioner could not hav e been released by the impugned order dated 25.03.2011. However, both Ms. R. Cho kraborty, learned State counsel as well as Mr. Singha, Standing counsel, BTC upo n reference to the impugned order dated 11.02.2011 by which the officers have be en transferred, submit that alongwith issuance of the said transfer order all th e officers including the petitioner stood released. Thus, the petitioner cannot fall back on redundant order, i.e. one dated 25.03.2011 (Annexure-IX). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that being aggrieved by the i mpugned action on the part of the respondents, the petitioner has made Annexure- VIII representation dated 21.03.2011 to the Principal Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Food Civil Supplies & Consumers Affairs Dept. and the same has not been disposed of. It appears that alongwith the said representation the petitioner ha s enclosed certain medical certificates. Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case of the petitione r, the writ petition is disposed of directing the said Principal Secretary to di spose of the representation strictly in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within 15.04.2011. The petitioner may obtain the certified c opy of this order and produce the same before the said authority on or before 31 .03.2011. Till then, the status quo as on today shall be maintained. It is once again clarified that in terms of the impugned order dated 11.02.2011 the petitio ner stood released on that date and by another order dated 25.03.2011 he has bee n once again shown released.