S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2643/2009. Date of Order :: 27th March 2009. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. R.S. Mankad for the petitioners. .... Though the matter has been listed in Court No.5, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a mention stating urgency. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners and perusing the material placed on record, this Court expressed prima facie reservations on the petitioners' seeking to invoke writ jurisdiction while complaining of reduction of their salary by the respondent institution, may be because of reduction of the grant-in- aid, in view of the recovery to be made from the institution for the claim of other individuals in whose favour final order has been passed by the Rajasthan Non-government Educational Institution Tribunal because, all said and done, if at all the petitioners were aggrieved of any disturbance in their service conditions, there was no reason that they had not taken resort to the appropriate alternative remedies including appropriate application before the said Tribunal. -2- Upon these observations, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners shall stand advised not to proceed with this writ petition any further and seeks permission to withdraw with liberty for petitioners to take resort to appropriate remedies in accordance with law. Permission granted. The petitioners are permitted to withdraw; and this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. Anil/