IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33727 of 2011 Sudisth @ Sudish Narayan Thakur Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 12.10.2011 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. Considering that the petitioner was earlier enlarged on bail and has remained in custody since 22.11.2010 on the ground of misuse of that privilege, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, FTC 4th, Motihari, East Champaran in Rajepur PS Case No. 16 of 1998 (Sessions Trial No. 9 of 1999). The petitioner does not appear to have been cautioned by the direction given on earlier occasion in Cr. Misc. No. 38397 of 2004 for personal appearance on each date. Should he default on even a single date, unless the trial court for reasons to its satisfaction may dispense with his personal appearance on an appropriate application, nothing precludes it from dealing with the petitioner appropriately notwithstanding the present order so that the trial is facilitated. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)