IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.561 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.561 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.561 OF 2006 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.R.S.Kate for the Appellant CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: AUGUST 7, 2006. AUGUST 7, 2006. AUGUST 7, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Advocate for the Appellant. The Appellant is the original Plaintiff. After having heard the learned Advocate for the Appellant and after perusing the impugned Judgment, I find that no substantial question of law arises. Both the courts below have held that the Appellant-Plaintiff failed to establish his case of encroachment committed by the first Respondent. Both the courts below have held that the Appellant has failed to establish existence of easementary rights. The said findings are based on oral and documentary evidence on record. There is no perversity in the said findings. Second Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Judge. Judge. Judge.