@ ll\ THE H1UH COURl' OF CHHA'ITISGAKH : B1LASPUK Wnt Peution IMo. 2210 of 2002 PetitiLoner M, P, State Koad 'i'raasport Corporation, Through its Divisioiial Manager, M.P.S.R.T.C. Bilaspur(C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Ctmattisgarh, Through fiie Secretai3r, Traiisport, D. K. Bhavaxi, Secretaiiat, Raipur (C.G,) 2. The Kegional Transport Authority, BUaspur (Chhattisgarh) 3. 'I'he Secretary, Regional /1 i-aiisport Authoritvr cuni R.T.0. (Region0! Trar^sport OfScer), Bilaspur. 4. Ghanshyami Singh, Bus Operator, R/o. Saiit Kabir Chowk, Raigarh (C.G.) WMLPMnQRMNDER_M^nci^226^2^ CONSTITUTION OF IND!A. (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotri J.) Shri Yogesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. yjari Shashaak I'hakur, Panel Lawyer tor the rcspondents No, 1 to 3. None tbr the respondent IMo.4. O R DER (Passed on ftiis 10th Day ot November, 2008) 1. The petitioner impugns the order dated 1.10,2002 (Annexure P/3), whereby admittedly tiie permit was graiited to the respondent No,4 to nm. tiie vehicle beaiio.g C.G. 13-ZA-0151 troni Saranggai'h to Kaigarh via Jharapketa Chaadi'apur ibr a period of one month trom 1.10.2002 to 31.10.2002. This peiinit period has already corae to aa end. Thus noftuiig reniaias tbr adjudication of fhe dispzite as no other issue is involved. 2. Leaiiied couusel appeariag for fhe petitioner admits that with fhe passage of tmie ttiis petition iias becoixie uifi-uctuous, 3, Thus, tlie petition is disinissed as haviag becoiae iafructuous. ConsequenUy, M(W)P No. 1267/2002 is also dlsmissed. Thaimr Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge