IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE. ORIGINAL SIDE. ORIGINAL SIDE. WRIT PETITION NO. 1351 OF 1992. WRIT PETITION NO. 1351 OF 1992. WRIT PETITION NO. 1351 OF 1992. M/s V.D.M. Wires & anr. ..Petitioners. vs. Union of India & ors. ..Respondents. Shri M.L. Bansal for the petitiner. Mr. H.V. Mehta for respondent No.1. Smt. Srivastav i/b Consulta Juris for respondent No.2. CORAM: V.C.DAGA & CORAM: V.C.DAGA & CORAM: V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 06-04-2005. DATED: 06-04-2005. DATED: 06-04-2005. P.C. 1. Heard rival parties. Perused petition. 2. It is clear from the consensus between the parties that cause of action for the present petition does not survive in view of the change in the old import policy. Even otherwise, the terms of the interim orders have not been complied with by the petitioner. The petition is thus dismissed for want of cause of action with no order as to costs. (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)