t.^ fer?5 / IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.l WRIT PETITION No. 3^6 /2009 PETJTIQNER VERSUS RESPONDENTS <(• .0>% ^^y ^'\ v.--" ^yy ^.•> !...•••' ..sff'~ &-•' / 1. /' B.R. Nishad, S/o Shri Tokharam Nishad, Aged about 48 Years R/o Madhuban Road, Dayalband, Bilaspur, CC.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, General Administration Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur [C.G.J 2. The Secretary, Revenue Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur [C.G.) 3. Collector, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (CG) ^" 4. Shri S. K. Kashyap, S/o Not Known to the Petitioner Assistant Grade-III Collectorate, Bilaspur [C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS: /A ~3sr ^ii^id.ti, ©tilyis,[s|oll-Hlj,< ...W^£:..,C5>..^......^^. ;-n"a ^i RsfRT ?iq?21T??!^F:IRi' SB ! HON'BLESHRI JUSTICB PtUTINKER DIWAKER 28.07.2009 Shri Kanak Tiwari, Sr. coij) counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh Thal<;ur; Contention of counsel for petitioner is already under con^: and therefore at this stage, he m| against the unpugned order datetf GoUector, Bilaspur. He further impugned is against the circular| his representation is decided he Counsel for the State has representation to the respondent| in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition ^s filing representation by the petit frona the date of receipt of the to be decaded by the respondent) from the date of its receipt. TiU maintain status quo in respect It is made clear that this Cl on merits of the case and the res the representation of the petitionf ipay ^Frt?rai;T w^Tt-^ fe^ ^re^R ^ nsel with Shri Matin Siddiqui, ur, Dy. A.G. for the State. the petitioner is that the caae of the ideration by the higher authorities iy be permitted to file representation 17.7.2009 passed by the Additional iubmits that prima facie the order of the govemment and therefore, till be given protecti\^ order. 10 objection if the petitioner makes a No.3 and the same is being decided |s disposed of. in the eventuality of ^oner within a period of three days of this order, the same is expected No.3 within a period of two weeks fien tbe respondents are direeted to petitioner. fourt has not expressed any opinion Ipondent No.3 is at liberty to decide strictly in accordance with law. corty oflthe dr Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge