IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8762 of 2011 RAKESH KUMAR, SON OF DULAR SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 19.04.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is not named in the first information report and his name surfaced in confessional statement of co-accused Chunnu Sharma, which is evident from perusal of Para 88 of the case diary. It is also pointed out by him that the statement of victim has been recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. but the victim has also not named the petitioner and moreover, having similar allegation some co-accused have already been granted privilege of bail by this Court. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State fairly conceded to the above stated submissions. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Pirbahor P.S. Case No. 359 of 2008. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )