IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2636 of 1999(O&M) Date of decision: 14.01.2010 Chirmoli and others ....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr. K.S.Saini, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ravi Dutt Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Ms. Vandana Malhotra, for HUDA-respondent No.2. ----- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioner states that as per the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos.1153-1167 of 2001, HUDA has formulated a rehabilitation scheme to provide alternative accommodation to persons who have been ejected from legal occupation of the land of HUDA at Panchkula/Faridabad. All the petitioners require consideration of the scheme for alternative accommodation in terms of the rehabilitation scheme. The petitioner and the persons mentioned in Annexure P-1 shall now make the representations to HUDA and they will be considered in the light of the rehabilitation scheme formulated by HUDA and appropriate allotments to be made. Since the issue concerns Civil Writ Petition No.2636 of 1999(O&M) - 2 - the housing of needy persons, it is only expected that HUDA is sensitive to their present problems when they have been displaced from the present places of occupation and the rehabilitation is made within a period of six months. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 14.01.2010. sanjeev