IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13005 of 2008 Bijoy Prasad, Son of Late Hari Prasad Sah, resident of Mohalla- Aliganj, P.S. Mojahidpur, District-Bhagalpur ----------Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Director-in-Chief, Department of Health, Bihar,Patna 2. The Health Commissioner, Govt. of Bihar,Patna 3. The Civil Surgeon, Dhamdaha, Purnia 4. Incharge Medical Officer, Dhamdaha, Purnia 5. The District Provident Fund Officer, Purnia 6. The Accountant General,Govt. of Bihar,Patna 7. The Branch Manager, Life Insurance Corporation, Dhamdaha( Purnia) Branch, Purnia 8. The Life Insurance Corporation, through the Branch Manager, Life Insurance Corporation, Dhamdaha Branch, Purnia ---------------------------------- 02 21-11-2011 Heard Sri Krishna Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioner , Sri Vijay Kumar Verma, learned A.C. to Standing Counsel no.5 appearing on behalf of Respondent nos. 1 to 7 and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent no.6/ Accountant General, Bihar. The petitioner, who retired on 1.02.2004 as Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Dhamdaha, Purnia due to non- payment of amount of G.P.F., Group Insurance , difference of pay and A.C.P. has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition in the year 2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the time of hearing admits that except the claim of different of pay from 1.02.1992 to 1.2.2004 other grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. So far as claim of difference of pay, which according to the petitioner is still unredressed, save and except making bald statement of the claims, there is no foundational fact in the writ petition and, as such, it would be difficult for this Court to adjudicate on the said issue. Since the main grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed and there is no specific averment regarding claim of difference of pay , the Court is of the opinion that the writ petition can be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned with specific plea of claim of difference of pay from 1.2.1992 to 1.2.2004. The Court expects that if such representation is filed by the petitioner before the Competent authority i.e. Respondent no.3 within a period of six weeks from today, the Respondent no.3/ Civil Surgeon, Dhamdaha, Purnia shall examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. If the Respondent no.3 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within the aforesaid period. Even in case of refusal, the Respondent no.3 is required to pass speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within four months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)