IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.18943-M of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision:8.12.2010 Sumedha and others .... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Veneet Soni, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Priyanka Dalal, A.A.G. Haryana. Mr. Ashok Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) On 20.9.2010, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 has made a statement that the charges have been framed against the present petitioners. The petitioners have also filed revision petition against the order framing charge. Today, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition in view of the said statement. Dismissed as withdrawn. 8.12.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE