IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. 4930 of 2008. Decided on: 21st September, 2010. ___________________________________________________ Sher Singh. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Sunny Dhatwalia, Advocate vice Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Respondents No. 3 & 4 are exparte. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Sunny Dhatwalia, learned vice counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has become infructuous due to intervening developments. Disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge 21st September, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.