THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.15234 of 2007 Dated 13th June, 2011 Between: M/s.Water Supply Specialist Private Limited …Petitioner And Govt.of A.P., Revenue Department, rep.by its Estate Officer, Secunderabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Siddhartha Roy For Sri P.Venugopal Counsel for respondent: AGP for Revenue The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably a writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings in CCLA/S REF.S3/701/2006, dated 23.06.2007, issued by the 2nd respondent as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently suspend the said proceeding by directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the property bearing Plot No.32, H.No.7-2-200/1 situate at Ghasmandi, Secunderabad.” The learned counsel for the petitioner circulated letter, dated 06.06.2011, wherein he sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to his client to file a fresh writ petition, if necessary. But, a perusal of the record shows that the earlier decision taken on 23.06.2007, rejecting the petitioner’s request for conversion of leasehold rights into freehold rights has been re-considered and a fresh order has been passed on 05.05.2011 granting such permission, subject to payment of certain amounts. In my opinion, the said proceedings being in favour of the petitioner, there is no necessity to reserve the liberty with the petitioner to initiate fresh proceedings. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.Nos.19219, 19220 and 21577 of 2007, and W.V.M.P.No.1778 of 2007 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 13th June, 2011 VGB