1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 248 OF 2010 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 249 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 948 OF 2010 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 251 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1730 OF 2009 H.M. Holding & Anr. ...Petitioners V/s. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Kunal Cheema i/by Ms. Reena Salunkhe for the Petitioners Mr. R.S. Apte, Senior Advocate, with Ms. G.S. Joglekar for the Respondent/MCGM. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, AG. C.J., AND S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE: MAY 06, 2010 P. C.:- The learned counsel appearing for the parties tender Minutes of Order, which have been duly signed by the petitioners and their advocate, so also the advocate for the respondents. Mr. Apte, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents, 2 states that the Minutes of Order may be taken on record, subject to the contentions of the Municipal Corporation and keeping open its rights in the petitions, including dealing with the allegations made in the affidavit-in-reply. He also states that the Corporation would have no objection if the Minutes of Order are taken on record, and an order is made in furtherance thereof so also the Notices of Motion are disposed of without this Court recording any reasons. 2. Accordingly, the Minutes of Order, duly signed, are taken on record, and marked ‘X’ for identification. Notices of Motion stand disposed of in terms of the Minutes of Order. No order as to costs. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.