IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 265 of 2010 Date of decision: 19.02.2010 Phuli Devi ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Sura, Addl. A.G, Haryana for the respondent State Mr. Shalender Mohan, Advocate for the complainant -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the co-accused of the petitioner, namely, Sirichand, father-in-law of the deceased being similarly situated as the petitioner has since been granted concession of regular bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 22.12.2009 passed in CRM No. M 33087 of 2009. Learned counsel for the complainant has not disputed the aforesaid factual position. In view of the above, bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Hisar. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge February 19, 2010 mohan