IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated 22.2.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.4074 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 to 4 of 2011 W.S. Industries (India) Ltd., represented by its Director-Corporate Affairs, Mr.M.Ganesan, 108, Mount Poonamallee Road, Porur, Chennai-600 116. ... Petitioner -Vs.- 1.Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, represented by its Chairman, 800, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 2.Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd.,(TANGEDCO) represented by its Director/Finance, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 006. 3.The Superintending Engineer, CEDC, Chennai South, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Chennai-600 078. ... Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the second respondent proposed in its impugned communication in Lr.No.Dir/F/FC/R/D.No.10 dated 26.11.2010, and the clarification in Lr.No.Dir/F/FC/R/D.No./10 dated 21.12.2010 as also the consequent bills for the months of November, December, 2010 and January, 2011 insofar as they relate to levy of cross subsidy surcharge and quash the same as being arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to continue to permit the petitioner to avail supply of power from the third party sources as also from its own sources without levying cross subsidy surcharge till such time Restriction and Control measures are withdrawn and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ also direct the second respondent to adjust the sum of Rs.7,53,418/- already collected under the guise of cross subsidy in future bills. For petitioner : Mr.M.Vijayan for M/s. King and Partride For respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran O R D E R Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the second respondent proposed in its impugned communication in Lr.No.Dir/F/FC/R/D.No.10 dated 26.11.2010, and the clarification in Lr.No.Dir/F/FC/R/D.No./10 dated 21.12.2010 as also the consequent bills for the months of November, December, 2010 and January, 2011 insofar as they relate to levy of cross subsidy surcharge and quash the same as being arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to continue to permit the petitioner to avail supply of power from the third party sources as also from its own sources without levying cross subsidy surcharge till such time Restriction and Control measures are withdrawn and also direct the second respondent to adjust the sum of Rs.7,53,418/- already collected under the guise of cross subsidy in future bills. 2. Sri A.Selvendran learned counsel appears for the respondents electricity board. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 4. The writ petition has been filed challenging the imposition of Cross Subsidy Surcharge, inter alia contending that the levy is arbitrary, unreasonable and has no basis. The HT Consumers have in the meanwhile submitted a memorandum/representation to the Government pending the writ petitions requesting the Government to withdraw the levy of Cross Subsidy Surcharge. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents electricity board, produced a copy of the Amended Circular issued in Circular Memo No.Dir/O/SE/LD&GO/E1/ABT/F interstate/D 3144/11 dated 8.2.2011 by the Tamilnadu Transmission Corporation Limited which reads as follows:- "In continuation of the already issued circular memo vide reference (1) and (2) cited above it is stated that For the HT consumers who purchase power upto their sanctioned demand from power exchanges, traders and generators, the relevant cross subsidy surcharge as per clause 6.5 of TNERC order No.2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ dt.15.05.2006 are temporarily waived until Restriction & Control measures are lifted. All S.Es./EDC are requested to adhere the above instructions strictly with immediate effect." 6. In view of the above Amended Circular dated 8.2.2011 issued by the Tamilnadu Transmission Corporation Limited, the demand of Cross Subsidy Surcharge in respect of the petitioner/HT Consumer is set aside. The respondents authorities are directed to adjust the amount, if any, paid by the HT Consumers/writ petitioner towards Cross Subsidy Surcharge, in the future current consumption bills. 7. The writ petition stands ordered as above. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Asst. Registrar //true copy// Sub Asst.Registrar ts To 1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 800, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 2.The Director/Finance, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., (TANGEDCO) 144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 006. 3.The Superintending Engineer, CEDC, Chennai South, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Chennai-600 078. 1 cc to M/s.King & Partridge, Advocate, Sr.No.12662 1 cc to Mr.A.Selvendran, Advocate, Sr.No.13461 W.P.No.4074 of 2011 MS {CO} TP/3.3.2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/