IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24676 of 2010 JHAROKHA DEVI WIFE OF BINDESHWAR PANDEY @ MADHU PANDEY Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. VIKASH PANDEY @ GOPAL PANDEY ----------- 2. 22.7.2010 The opposite party no.2 was granted bail by this Court vide Cr.Misc.No.44616 of 2009 by an order dated 23.12.2009 and the present application has been filed on behalf of the informant stating that there has been suppression and this court has been misled to grant bail to the opposite party no.2. However, on question as to how this court has been misled the answer is that there has been a suppression that the petitioner used to threaten the witnesses. I do not find this is a good enough ground for cancellation of bail since the impugned order has been passed on merits of the case. If at all the informant is aggrieved by the petitioner’s conduct subsequent to his release from jail custody, the proper course for him is to approach the court below, who will make due enquiry into the matter. This application is dismissed. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )