IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24210 of 2008 BRAJESH YADAV @ BIDESH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 10.07.2008 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Informant’s daughter Rina Devi was married with the petitioner in June, 2005. She was being subjected to torture in connection with additional demand of dowry by way of motorcycle, colour T.V. and chain of gold. When the informant’s daughter express her inability due to poverty then informant came to know that his daughter has met with some unfortunate accident. Thereafter he rushed and found his daughter bearing a firearm injury on her temporal region. Submission is that after investigation the case has been found to be under Section 302 by the I.O. The death is within two years and there is specific allegation of demand of dowry prior to her death. The petitioner is the husband, undoubtedly some other accused persons have been granted bail but the petitioner cannot be equated with others. When the informant is saying that there was constant demand of dowry then I.O. had no business to submit the chargesheet under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the entire allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly his prayer for bail is rejected. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)