THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI C.R.P.Nos. 2461 of 2011 and 2462 of 2011 COMMON ORDER Petitioners herein are the plaintiffs in O.S.No. 644 of 2007 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, N.T.R. Nagar, Hyderabad. The suit was filed for perpetual injunction against the defendants-respondents herein restraining them from interfering with the possession of the plaintiffs in respect of the plaint schedule property i.e Ac. 274-06 gts. of land situated in S.No. 82 to 101 situated at Bacharam village, Shivarkonala Vampu, East Taluk, presently Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Despite service of suit summons, the defendants remained exparte. However, the Court below, after hearing the counsel for the plaintiffs and on consideration of the documents produced, dismissed the suit by judgment dated 27.10.2009 holding that it was not a matter for granting a decree as prayed for. That apart, while making certain observations with regard to the genuineness of the documents produced by the plaintiffs, the Court below directed the District Collector, Ranga Reddy District to hold enquiry against the revenue officials who issued pattadar pass books to the plaintiffs and initiate proceedings including criminal proceedings against such persons. While so, the revision petitioners-plaintiffs filed I.A.Nos. 204 of 2010 and 205 of 2010 with a prayer to return the documents marked as Exs.A-1 to A-5 apart from an unmarked document i.e. the sale deed dated 23.11.1972 stating that the same are required by the plaintiffs for the purpose of their record and other official purpose. Having regard to the fact that the enquiry directed by the Court while dismissing O.S.No. 644 of 2007 was still pending, the Court below declined to return the documents and accordingly dismissed both the I.A.Nos. 204 and 205 of 2010 by order dated 4.3.2010. Aggrieved by the same, these two Revisions are filed by the plaintiffs. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. A perusal of the Report dated 27.6.2011 submitted by the Court below shows that the enquiry in terms of the judgment in O.S.No. 644 of 2007 is still pending before the District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. Having regard to the observations made by the Court below that the documents in question were not genuine and that the enquiry directed by the Court is still pending, the original documents cannot be returned and therefore the Court below had rightly declined to return the said documents. Accordingly, both the Revision Petitions are dismissed. However, it is left open to the petitioners-plaintiffs to renew their request for return of the documents after completion of enquiry in terms of the judgment dated 27.10.2009 in O.S.No.644 of 2007. No costs. ___________________ G. ROHINI, J. Date: 2.9.2011 CHV