HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR: GHHATTL$GARH Singie Bench: Hon’bie shri H.L. Dattu, CJ. Contempt Petition No. 7? OF 2007‘ Applican (Petitioner) Manahar Jethani! son of Late Dr. Variyai Das Jeihani, aged about 42 years, resident of — Amardeep Talkies Read, Near Hotel Kohinoor, Ganesh Nagar, Raipur (CG) Vs. Nan-applicants 1. Dr. Krishnamurti Bandhi, Ministerfor State, Heaith and Fami!y Welfare Department, Government of Chhattisgar’n, Residence —- Behind ‘Pahuna’ Guest House, Shankar Nagar) Raipur (CG) eL. Agraw'ai, Secret'ary, Heaith & Family Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 3. Bharat Bajai, Nominated President, CG. State Pharmacy Councii, Q.No.77, Sector- 3, Geetanjaii Nagar, Ra'ipur (C.G.) 4. TR. Sahu, Registrar, C‘nnattisgarh State Pharmacy Councii, Qr. No.77, Secter—3, Geetanjaii Nagar, Raipur (6.6.). Respondent No.1 2. Respondent No.2 Present: Shri Virendra Shanna, counsei for the appiicant. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 2"a April, 2007) This Court while disposing of the writ petition No.2829 of 2005 dated 06.02.2006 had issued the following directions: “i dispose of this writ petition directing the 2“ respondent to register the name of the petitioner as Pharmacist under the Act without insisting that the petitioner shoutd fill-in prescribed applications under Sections 32 & 33 of the Act. However, it is made clear that if there are any grounds for the 2’” respondent to proceed against the petitioner in terms oi the Act, it is open for him to take corrective measures in accordance with law." o (2) After disposal of the writ petition, the 2“ respondent without insisting on the petitioner to fill up the applications under Sections 32 & 33 of t the Act has registered the name of the petitioner as a Pharmacist and thereafter proceeded to hold certain enquiries by way of corrective measures. V a (3) Since those corrective measures are initiated by the 2““ respohdent/non—applicant, the petitioner is before me in this contempt petition inter allia aileging that the respondents have wiiifuiiy, deiiberateiy and purposefuily disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this Court. Apprehending that the 2“” respondent may proceed against the petitioner and similariy situated persons; the petitioner has approached this Court in this contempt petition. Mere apprehension on the part of the petitioner cannot be a ground to take any action against the respondents. if for any reason, the respondents insist upon the petitioner to fill the prescribed applicationunder Sections 32 8: 33 of the Act before registering the name as pharmacist then only the cause of action would arise for them. Otherwise, it cannot be said that the non—applicants have disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this Court. in view of the above, i deciine to entertain this contempt petition and accordingly, it is rejected. Ordered accordingly. (4),‘