WPMS No.163 of 2003 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. B. S. Thind, the learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. S. K. Jain, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pankaj Miglani, the learned counsel for the private respondents. The present writ petition arises out of the proceedings under Rule 39 Rule 1 & 2 of the C.P.C. This Court by an interim order dated 27th March, 2003 had granted an interim order directing the parties to maintain status- quo, which is still operating. More than seven years have elapsed and the interim order is continuing. No useful purpose would be served in deciding the interim application at this stage. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the trail court to decide the suit within one year from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. It is made clear that the parties will not seek undue adjournments. Till the disposal of the suit, the interim order granted by this Court will continue to operate. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 16.07.2010 LSR