R.F.A. No. 3445 of 2006 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.F.A. No. 3445 of 2006 (O&M) Date of decision : 24.1.2011 Siri Niwas and others .... Appellants vs State of Hayana and others .... Respondents Coram : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. RAJESH BINDAL, J The landowners have filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly the facts are that vide notification dated 8.6.1998 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act'), the State of Haryana sought to acquire land in the revenue estates of village Dadri, District Bhiwani, for construction of Grain and Vegetable markets, its office and staff quarters. The same was followed by notification under Section 6 of the Act dated 24.3.1999. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, 'the Collector') assessed the compensation for the acquired land @ ` 85/- per square yard. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the landowners filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below upheld the award of the Collector and dismissed the reference. Aggrieved against the award of learned Court below, the landowners are before this Court. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the issues raised in the present appeal are squarely covered by judgment of this court in RFA No. 1867 of 2006 Jani alias Jai Narain vs State of Haryana and another, decided on 29.9.2010, whereby the compensation payable to the landowners for the land acquired vide same notification was enhanced to ` 125/- per square yard. R.F.A. No. 3445 of 2006 (2) Learned State counsel did not dispute the aforesaid factual position. Accordingly, for the reasons recorded in Jani alias Jai Narain 's case (supra), the appeal is disposed of in the same terms. 24.1.2011 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge