IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM THURSDAY, THE 21ST JULY 2011 / 30TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 19832 of 2011(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- LAKSHMIKUTTY, AGED 81 YEARS, W/O.LATE RAGHAVAN, KALATHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, VALUMMEL ROAD, THOPPUMPADY, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.SABU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. ASOKAN, S/O.LATE RAGHAVAN, KALATHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, VALUMMEL ROAD, THOPPUMPADY, ERNAKULAM NOW RESIDING AT KALATHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KONTHURUTHY, THEVARA-682013. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALLURUTHY POLICE STATION-682006. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, LAW & ORDER, MATTANCHERY-682002. 4. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, COCHIN CITY, ERNAKULAM-682018 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.19832/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29/10/2008 PASSED BY THE LEARNED JFCM COURT - II, KOCHI, EXT.P2: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 9/7/2009 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 30/6/2011 FILED BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No. 19832 OF 2011 ------------------------ Dated this the 21st day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. The grievance voiced by the petitioner, an octogenarian lady, is that the first respondent her son is not permitting her to enter the house, in respect of which she has a residence order under the provisions of the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act,2005 confirmed even by this court. 2. Having considered the averments in the writ petition and the submissions of Sri.K.V.Sabu, learned counsel for the petitioner, we feel that proper remedy available to the petitioner even if she has a genuine grievance is to invoke the provisions of section 19(5) or other appropriate provisions of the Domestic Violence Act before the learned Magistrate himself. The petitioner can also invoke remedies under other statutes if any available. We relegate the petitioner to such remedies and dispose of this writ petition without examining the merits of the grounds raised. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE dpk