1 srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 537 OF 2009 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 15 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1625 OF 1994 H.G. Patil & Ors. ............................ Petitioners vs Bhaskar Shankar Punalkar & Anr. ................................ Respondents .. Mr. Santosh Narwade i/b M.P. Vashi & Associates for Petitioners Mr. P.M. Patel i/b B.K. & Girdharlal for Respondent No.1 .. CORAM: A.S.OKA, J DATE: 19th November, 2009 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent. 2 The Contempt Petition filed by the Petitioners has been dismissed for want of prosecution by this court on the ground that the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners was absent. The prayer in this Notice of Motion is for restoration of the Contempt Petition. The learned counsel appearing for the first respondent has opposed the prayer by pointing out that the same is barred by limitation. 2 3 The Contempt Petition has been dismissed by order dated 13th April, 2009 on the ground that amendment was not carried out and that the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners was absent. In view of the averments in the affidavit in support, a case is made out for restoration. 4 The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to condition that the amendment shall be carried out within a period of three weeks from today. If the amendment is not carried out within stipulated time, the order of dismissal shall stand. The Contempt Petition be placed for admission on 17th December, 2009. Judge.