MC 401/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C. UPADHYAY Heard Mr. R.P.N. Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. B. Chanda, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1,2,5 and 6. Seen the report of the Registry regarding service of notice upon the rem aining respondents. The petitioner has filed an affidavit stating therein that the service o f notice upon the respondent Nos.3,4,8,11 and 14 by substituted manner has been effected by publication of notice in the local newspapers, namely, The Assam Tr ibune , in issue dated 15.12.2010 in pursuance of Court’s order. Accordingly, it appears from the records and the note of the Registry that notic es have been duly served upon the respondents. This Misc. application has been filed for substitution of the legal repr esentative of respondent No.10 in CRP No.239 of 2010 who expired in the meantime . The opposite parties have not submitted any objection despite service of notice. Accordingly, accepting the reasons assigned, the prayer for substitution of legal representative of the deceased respondent is allowed. Let the name of Sri Bikash Sharma be substituted in place of respondent No.10. Registry shall insert the name of the newly substituted legal representa tive in the cause title of the CRP No.239 of 2010. The petitioner shall take steps for causing service of notice upon newly added respondent. Misc. Case stands disposed of in terms of the above.