CWP(T) 5034/2008 (OA 653/98) 04.05.2010 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General with Mr. R. M. Bisht, Dy. A.G. and Mr. P. M. Negi, Dy. A.G. for the respondents. Mr. Ajay Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioner has invited my attention to the judgments rendered by the Apex Court in Surjit Singh versus State of Punjab and others, (1996) 2 SCC 336 and Suman Rakheja versus State of Haryana and another (2004), 13 SCC 562. 2. After the matter was heard for some time Mr. Ajay Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that his client would be content if a direction is issued to the respondents to decide the petitioner’s case in accordance with the ratio of law laid down by the Apex Court in the above mentioned judgments. Mr. R. K. Sharma, learned Sr. Addl. Advocate General has no objection to the same. Under the circumstances respondent No. 2 is directed to decide the petitioner’s case afresh keeping in view the ratio of law laid down by the Apex Court. Liberty granted to the parties to place additional material, if any, before the appropriate authorities. The decision shall be taken within a period of twelve weeks from the date of the receipt of the certified copy of the order. Needless to add the same shall be communicated to the petitioner. With the aforesaid observations the petition stands disposed of. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. May 04, 2010 (PK)