IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11447 of 2010 SUSHIL CHANDRA MISHRA, son of Late Mahendra Narayan Mishra, resident of Village, P.O. and P.S. Baluabazar, Distt. Supaul (earlier Saharsa) ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through the Commissioner Cum Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Sinchai Bhavan, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Old Secretariat, Patna. 3. The Deputy Secretary, Water Resources Department, Sinchai Bhavan, Patna. 4. The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Birpur. 5. The Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Department, Barrage Circle, Birpur (Supaul). 6. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 22.7.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State as also the Accountant General. The petitioner superannuated on 31st of December, 1997 from the post of Assistant Engineer, Barrage Circle, Birpur (Supaul). It is submitted that till date, the petitioner is not receiving his pensionary benefits on the revised scale of his salary and consequently he is not receiving the correct pensionary benefit as indicated in paragraph 1 of the writ application itself. This apart, the petitioner has not been paid his G.P.F. despite representation. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State submits that the representations filed by the petitioner are not clear with regard to his claims. In reply, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation filed by the petitioner, as contained in Annexure 3, contains sufficient materials to consider the claims of the 2 petitioner. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to represent the matter by filing a representation before the Deputy Secretary, Water Resources Department, Patna (respondent no.3), with a copy to the Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Birpur (respondent no.4). In case such a representation is filed stating distinctly all his unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled and the necessary sanction order may be communicated to the Accountant General so that the eventual admitted dues may be paid to the petitioner with interest permissible under the rules. Upon consideration, however, if any of the claims or any part of the claims is found not admissible or not being paid, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)