1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6095 OF 2009 _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office } Memoranda of Coram, } Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's } orders or directions } and Registrar's orders } ___________________________}___________________________________ Mrs. A.N.Ansari, Advocate, for Petitioner Mr. S.N.Kendre, A.G.P. for State. Mr. S.P.Bramhe, Advocate for respondent no. 1. ........................... [ CORAM : B.R.GAVAI, J. ] DATE : 24/11/2009. PER COURT : 1. By way of present Writ Petition, the petitioners challenge the Order dated 26/6/2009, vide which the application filed by an employee for condonation of delay in filing Appeal against the termination, came to be allowed. 2. The matter of condonation of delay in filing Appeal is within the discretion of the learned Tribunal. This Court would not sit in Appeal over the order of the learned Tribunal condoning delay unless it is found that the delay has been condoned by dictating reasons, which can be said to be perversed. 2 3. It is also equally settled that length of delay is not material. What is material is, as to whether the Court is satisfied that the reasons given by the party, make out a case of “ sufficient cause ” for condoning the delay. 4. The learned Tribunal has given elaborate and sound reasons in exercising the discretion for condoning the delay. 5. In that view of the matter, no case is made out. The present Writ Petition is disposed of. [ B.R.GAVAI ] JUDGE knp/WP6095.09