: 1 : SD IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.1680 OF 1987 NO.1680 OF 1987 NO.1680 OF 1987 Sundeep Jugalkishore Gupta ...Plaintiff V/s. Vijaykumar Purshottam Kabali . HUF and Ors. ...Defendants Mr.Sandeep Bhimekar, Advocate, i/b. Wadia Gandhy & Co., for the Plaintiff. Ms.Gadakkar with Ms.Anuradha Bhave, Advocates, i/b. Divya Shah & Associates, for Defendant Nos.1, 2B and 4. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATE DATE DATE : 11TH AUGUST, 2008. : 11TH AUGUST, 2008. : 11TH AUGUST, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The learned Counsel for the Plaintiff shows me the order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 29th April, 2008 in IA Nos.2-3 in Civil Appeal Nos.20-21 of 2008 in the matter of Vijaykumar Purshottam Kabali HUF & Anr. V/s. Sundeep Jugalkishore Gupta & Ors. 2. It is seen that this Suit has been disposed of through consent terms that were filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. A copy of such consent terms is not yet brought on record of this Court. Hence the Suit is kept : 2 : back till 3 p.m. so that further order can be passed. 3. Later on at 3 p.m., the learned Counsel for the Plaintiff has produced on record a photocopy of the certified copy of the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court annexed with the consent terms in terms of which the present Suit came to be disposed of. On perusal of the said consent terms, it is found that the Plaintiff has received an amount in lumpsum as consideration for giving up his right, title and interests arising out of this Suit. 4. This Suit is thus decreed in terms of the consent terms. Decree to be drawn accordingly. [A.V. [A.V. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] NIRGUDE, J.] NIRGUDE, J.]