IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41899 of 2009 1. MD.FAHIM @ SHEKH FAHIM S/O MD.BUTTAN @ SAMID 2. MD. BUTTAN @ SAMIDS/O LATE SK.JHAGRU 3.BIBI CHUNIYA W/O MD. BUTTAN @ SAMID 4. MD. NAIM S/O MD.BUTTAN @ SAMID 5. MD. KAIM S/O MD. BUTTAN @SAMID AND 6.MOBILA KHATOON W/O MD.NAIM, R/V. BARI MAKANDPUR OF P.S. GOPALPUR, DISTT.BHAGALPUR. Versus STATE OF BIHAR -- -----a---- 2 9.2.2010 Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and the A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case registered under section 498 (A) of the I.P.C. It is clear from the complaint that there is nothing specific against the petitioner. Petitioner no.1 is husband of the complainant and case of the husband under section 498 A of the I.P.C. is not on equivalent footing of others. Considering this the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no.1 is rejected. So far the prayer for anticipatory bail of other petitioners are concerned, they are separate from the petitioner no.1, the complainant’s husband. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case the petitioners above named in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within twenty days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., 2 Katihar, in C.A. No.820/03 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. AnilKr.Sinha (Shyam Kishore Sharma,J.)