IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39209 of 2009 TARANAND MANDAL. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. with Cr.Misc. No.39613 of 2009 RANJEET KUMAR VERMA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. ----------- 2 20.11.2009 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioners, Taranand Mandal and Ranjeet Kumar Verma have been made accused in connection with Nirmali P.S. Case No. 28/2009 (G.R.No.243/2009) for the offences punishable under Sections 420/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 25(1-a)B/26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Substance of allegation against these petitioners is of sitting in the vehicle which was apprehended by the informant and in which he found gun and that explanation was not found to be satisfactory giving rise to the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no case either under Sections 420 and 120B is made out against these petitioners. It is 2 further submitted that even the so called recovery of arms was not from their personal possession, it is alleged to have been kept in vehicle. Learned counsel jointly submits that no case is made out and that they have been wrongly roped in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that in similar circumstances co-accused have been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 28.10.2009 in Cr.Misc. No. 34969 of 2009 with Cr.Misc. No.35406 of 2009 and order dated 04.11.2009 in Cr.Misc. No. 38025 of 2009. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, Taranand Mandal and Ranjeet Kumar Verma, be enlarged on bail upon each of them furnishing individual bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Birpur, at Supaul in connection with Nirmali P.S. Case No. 28 of 2009 (G.R. No. 243/2009) subject to the condition that the petitioners would be attending the court below on each and every date fixed and failure on their part to attend the court on two consecutive dates fixed 3 without reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the Court below would grant liberty to the court below to initiate proceeding for cancellation of their bail bond and for taking them into custody. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J. )