1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Bail Application No. 4866/2010 Aman Singh Vs State of Rajasthan 20.7.2010 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Ashwin Garg - for the petitioner Mr Laxman Meena, PP – for the State Mr SR Surana – for complainant BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a revenue suit was filed for the property in dispute initially by Suresh Chand. Aforesaid suit was filed in the year 2008 making claim against the original owner Smt Krishna Devi. An interim order was also passed in the aforesaid suit. In the meanwhile, land in dispute was sold to the complainant through unregistered power of attorney. The petitioner has no direct nexus or relation or even transaction between the complainant. If any transaction exists then it was between the complainant and the power of attorney holder Jaipal Singh thus so far as petitioner is concerned, he may be granted benefit of anticipatory bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor as also 2 learned counsel for complainant have opposed the bail application. It is submitted that petitioner is also involved in the matter which is coming out from the suit filed by Mrs Krishna Devi in the year 2009 making various allegations against Suresh Kumar and many others including present petitioner. Present petitioner is an instrument to sale the property of Krishna Devi which was otherwise sold to the petitioner by power of attorney holder Jaipal Singh thus looking to aforesaid petitioner may not be granted anticipatory bail. After taking into consideration rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, but looking to the facts of this case, I allow this bail application under section 438 CrPC. Therefore, the SHO/IO of the Police Station – Ramgarh, Alwar is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner/s Aman Singh in FIR No. 639/2009 registered for offence under Section/s 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC, he shall enlarge him on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- 3 (i)He shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii)He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii)He shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (iv)He shall not commit same and similar offence during the period of bail. (MN Bhandari), J. bnsharma