1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.975 OF 2008. IN FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.9317 OF 2008. Doma Sadashiv Dadmal .vs. Shalikram Kisan Arikar. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. Coram: C. L. PANGARKAR J. Dated : 2nd December, 2008. Heard Mr.Bharat Vora, Advocate for the appellant and Mr.Gupte, Advocate for the respondent. This application is filed for restoration of the civil application which came to be dismissed for default. It is stated that on 10/7/2008 the matter was fixed for hearing on delay condonation application but the learned counsel for the appellant could not remain present in the court as he was required to go out of station. He had 2 directed his client to mention the matter before he court but before he could mention, the matter was already dismissed. Considering the fact that the learned counsel for the appellant was out of station and matter could not be mentioned before the court, the application for delay condonation stands restored to file. JUDGE. chute