1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6111 OF 2006 Sujata d/o Govindrao Chatre .. PETITIONER VERSUS Ankush s/o Ramrao Dhavele & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. A.V. Patil, Advocate holding for Mr. V.D. Gunale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.N. Patil and Mr. P.G. Mahalankar, Advocates for respondent no. 1. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 9th December, 2009 PER COURT : 1 This is a petition by original plaintiff raising challenge to the order passed by the 3 rd Adhoc Additional District Judge, Latur on 28-7-2006 whereby appeal presented by the respondents / original defendants came to be allowed and the order granting injunction in favour of the petitioner / original plaintiff came to be quashed and set aside. At the time of issuance of notice on the petition, this court directed both the parties to maintain status quo. Oder passed in the year 2006 is operative till today. In these circumstances, without entering into the merit of the controversy raised in the 2 petition, it would be desirable to direct the trial court to decide the pending suit expeditiously. Trial court is directed to decide Regular Civil Suit no. 141/2004 as expeditiously as possible preferably by the end of June, 2010. In the meantime, order passed by this court on 30-8-2006 directing both the parties to maintain status quo shall remain operative. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp6111.06.odt