IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2011 / 29TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 19571 of 2011(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. BIJU, KUZHICHALIL KULASEKHARAMANGALAM PO, VAIKOM. 2. MANU, LEELASADANAM, KULASEKHARAMANGALAM PO, VAIKOM. BY ADV. SRI.K.A.ABHILASH SRI.DILISH JOHN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM 686 002. 2. THE GEOLOGIST MINING AND GEOLOGY DISTRICT OFFICE CIVIL STATION, COLLECTORATE PO, KOTTAYAM 686 002. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.19571/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE DEALERS LICENSE ISSUED TO THE 1ST PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 10/8/2010 VALID UP TO 31.3.2011 FOR STOCKING AND SELLING OF SAND. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY of THE DEALERS LICENSE ISSUED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 5.8.2010 VALID UPTO 31.3.2011 FOR STOCKING AND SELLING OF SAND. EXT.P3(a) AND P3(b): TRUE CPIES ORDERS DATED 13.12.2010 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONERS. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 19571 OF 2011 (V) ===================== Dated this the 20th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are aggrieved by Exts.P3(a) and P3(b) orders issued by the 2nd respondent suspending their licence. These orders are dated 13/12/2010 and by these orders, petitioners were asked to produce counter signed cash memorandums and accounts showing the transactions until that date. Orders also show that until documents are so produced and the verification is completed, licence will stand suspended as mentioned above. 2. In this writ petition pleadings do not show that the aforesaid requirements were complied with by the petitioners. If that be so, I cannot find fault with the authorities in keeping the licence issued to the petitioners under suspension. 3. Be that as it may, petitioners express their willingness to produce the documents as directed in Exts.P3(a) and P3(b). It is ordered that if the petitioners produce documents as directed in the aforesaid orders, the same will be verified by the 2nd respondent, and on such verification, the 2nd respondent will also consider revoking the suspension ordered in Exts.P3(a) and P3(b). WPC No. 19571/11 :2 : 4. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp