IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8738 of 2010 KAMTA PRASAD SON OF LATE MUKHLAL GOPE, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SIKANDARPUR, P.S. BIHTA, DISTRICT PATNA …. PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SADHNA SINGH, WIFE OF LATE SHAILENDRADHARI SINGH, RESIDENT OF DHARHARA KOTHI, NAYA TOLA, P.S. KADAMKUAN, DISTRICT PATNA ….. OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 2. 1.12.2010 The petitioner has sought quashing of the entire proceeding including the order dated 16.2.2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Danapur in Bihta P.S. case No.270 of 2009, by which he has refused to discharge the petitioner. The case of the opposite party no.2 is that on the basis of a forged ‘hukumnama’ the petitioner was ploughing the land which legally belonged to the informant. Apart from a vague allegation that hukumnama was forged and that they were meting out threats there does not appear to be anything cogent against the petitioner. The learned Counsel for the opposite party no.2 has submitted that in fact the trial has proceeded and three witnesses have been examined. However, considering the nature of allegations against the petitioner, I allow the application and set aside the entire proceeding and order dated 16.2.2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Danapur in Bihta P.S. case No.270 of 2009. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )