IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16077 of 2009 GUDDU RAI @ DHANANJAY RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.05.2009 Heard both sides. The petitioner seeks bail in a case in a case instituted under sections 364A and 120B of Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that he is not named in F.I.R. In course of investigation, two co-accuseds namely Pankaj Sharma and Sikandar Rai have made disclosure statement wherein the petitioner has been named. It is further submitted that the aforesaid co-accuseds namely Pankaj Sharma and Sikandar Rai have been granted bail under order dated 4.10.2007 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 46159 of 2007 and 29.8.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 22617 of 2008 respectively. It is further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 17.10.2006. Counsel for the State accepts this position. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner abovenamed be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court of learned F.T.C.-II Patna in connection with S. Tr. No. 864 of 2007(arising out of Danapur P.S. case no.541 of 2005) subject to the condition that one of the bailers shall be 2 own/close family members of the petitioner and that the petitioner shall appear in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed in the trial failing which the Trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )