IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17576 of 2011 SHARWAN DASH, SON OF SUNDER DASH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MADHAUL, P.S. SARAIYA, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.6.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Mani Madhukar, learned Additional Public prosecutor. The petitioner, who is in custody in Saraiya P.S. Case No.93 of 2010 for the offence under Sections 25 (1-b) a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act since the month of May,2010, has prayed for grant of bail. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has sufficiently remained in jail and he was falsely implicated. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer for bail. It was submitted that from the order sheet itself, it is evident that matter is pending for trial. In view of nature of accusation and period of custody, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 5th Addl. Sessions Judge, 2 Muzaffarpur in Sessions Trial No.446 of 2010 arising out of Saraiya P.S. Case No.93 of 2010. One of the bailors should be close relative of the petitioner and secondly, on each and every date, during the trial, the petitioner shall remain physically present, failing which his bail bond shall stand automatically cancelled. However, in special exigency, the petitioner can remain absent on a particular date with prior permission of the trial court. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)