1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.4183/2001. : : Nishant Sharma Vs. Rajasthan High Court & Anr. : : Date of Order 15.12.2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Ms.Naina Saraf for the petitioner. Mr.Inderjeet Singh for the respondent (s). Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner in the present writ petition has challenged the order dated 1.8.2001 by which his services were terminated pursuant to the order dated 9.7.2001 passed by the Registrar of the Rajasthan High Court. The petitioner was appointed on the post of LDC by order dated 3.5.2001 on compassionate ground in consideration of the fact that his father, who was serving the respondents, died on 20.10.1990. The Registrar of this Court by his order dated 9.7.2001 addressed to all the District Judges observed that compassionate ground appointment of such persons may not be further extended if it is found in contravention within law laid down by the judgment of this Court in Board of Revenue Vs. Rajendra : RLR 2001 (1) 500. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner has cited judgment of this Court in Smt.Sita Devi Vs. District & Sessions Judge & Anr. in SB Civil Writ Petition No.5242/2001 decided on 4.7.2008 in which case also the petitioner was removed pursuant to the aforesaid circular of the Registrar and who too was appointed on compassionate ground. The writ petition was allowed in following terms :- “In the result, the writ petition is allowed and the order of removal dated 29.9.2001 (Annex.1) is quashed and set aside. The petitioner shall be treated to have been continued in service with effect from the date she was initially appointed. However, in view of the long lapse of time, petitioner shall be entitled to only notional benefits for the intervening period.” In the light of the aforesaid judgment the present writ petition is also allowed. The order of removal dated 1.8.2001 (Annex.8) is quashed and set aside. Since the petitioner was continued in service pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court on 29.8.2001, he would be deemed to have continued throughout with all consequential benefits. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/- Item No.17.