^ IN THE HIGH CQUR'LQF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION (Sl No. <^\^T /2010 DivJS Petitioner 1 \ ^•^ ...•? ty.'' ^ <?li^-1 •^f^" /ci Vikas Kumar Dhruw S/o Shri Ram. Ratan Dhruw, Aged about 42 years, Occupation-Service, presently working as Medical Officer (Medical), Department of Home (Police), State of CG, R/o HIG-110, Vijeta Complex, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ,..^* <?c:>- ^y x^- Respondents Versus '^ft. \ 'S/ /^?.Xi;£'ts \vts\ /O? :! %^' ^ '^^T^*^ A^ 'y State of Chhattisgarh, through its Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Secretary, Department of Home, State of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Secretary, Department of Medical Education, State of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Director, Medico-Legal Institute, State of Chhattisgarh, Pandit JLN University, Chhattisgarh Director, Education, Raipur, Medical State of Chhattisgarh, Old Nurses Hostel, Chhattisgarh Raipur, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FORISSUANCE OF £:t^S isws 'g^^^f-^Wf-^ ._ ___ ,__..-.-. .-^_ : •-:»••-!:avr: 'j^i.lj. 1 !!li:E-i ![Si Eij 1)111 i! t ; :B?E3gf;:! % i 3 i i kii; HIGH COURT' OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR W,,£_LS) No, 2467 of 2010 Petitioner Vikas Kuiaar Dhruw Versus Respondents State of Chltattisgarh & others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA DB: HonTile Mr. I. M. Quddusi. fe Hon'ble Mr. N. K. Agarwal, JJ. Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri Suinesh Bajaj, Govt. Advocate for the respoadents. O RD E R (orall ( Passed on fhis 14*h day ofJune, 2010 ) Per I. M. Quddusi, J. 1. Heard leamed counsel appeariag for the writ petitioner as weU as learaed counsel for fhe respondents/ State. 2. Leanied counsel appearing for fhe petitioner subiaits fhat ia the instant writ petition fhe petitioner seeks foUowiag reUef; "10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct fhe respondents to provide channel of proiuotion to the petitioner and declare Rules, 1987 as ultra vircs to the extent it does not provide any channel for proinotion for fhe petitioner. 10.2 That, fhis Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct tbe respondeuts to reserve fhe seat of M.D. (Pattt.) or M.S.(Aaat) for medical ofl&cer of the Medico-Legal Institution." <5. Leamed counsel further subinits that so far as fhe secoud relief is conceined, the petitiouer has filed a representation (Annexure P/10) which is pending consideration. He submits fhat tlie concemed authorily inay be directed to consider fhe sauae and decision. shatl be taken as early as possible, preferably within a nionth froin llie date of receipt of a copy of fhis order along wifh copy of the writ petition. <!)-,. 82- 5. 6. In view offhe above, we are not considering fhe first reUefas for the second relief we are inclm.ed to pass fhe order in the maaner prayed for. However, in case fhe petitioner stUl feels aggrieved by fhe decision, it wfll be open for hun to file a writ petition for the reliefs sought for ia fhis writ petition. It is ordered accordiagly. In view offhe above, the petition stauds disposed of. Certified copy, as per Rules. Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sd;- ^.^. y Jud&e wal Thakur