IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6561 of 2011 AYODHYA MAHASETH, S/O LATE NATHUNI MAHASETH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- HATHIYAHI, P.S.- KHAJAULI, DISTRICT – MADHUBANI, LECTURER IN GEOGRAPHY (RTD.) IN J.M.D.P.L. MAHILA COLLEGE, MADHUBANI. ........ PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY THROUGH ITS VICE-CHANCELLOR, KAMESHWARANAGAR, DARBHANGA, DISTRICT: DARBHANGA. 4. THE VICE –CHANCELLOR OF L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, KAMESHWARANAGAR, DARBHANGA, DISTRICT: DARBHANGA. 5. THE REGISTRAR OF THE L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, KAMESHWARANAGAR, DARBHANGA, DISTRICT: DARBHANGA. .........RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 18.04.2011 Heard Sri Ranjan Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt. Sanjana, learned A.C. to A.A.G. No. 13 appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1 & 2 and learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 3, 4 & 5/L.N. Mithila University. The petitioner who retired with effect from 28.02.2009, as Lecturer in the Geography Department, Jhumak Mahaseth Dr. Dharma Priya Lal Mahila College (J.M.D.P.L.M. College) Madhubani, under L.N. Mithila University has prayed for directing the respondents to pay all his retiral dues. It was submitted by Sri Jha that even provident fund amount has not been released till date. It was further submitted that petitioner has also filed number of representations before the authority concerned but all went in vain. 2 The court is of the opinion that the writ petition can be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no. 4 i.e. Vice- Chancellor, L.N. Mithila University, within a period of six weeks. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file fresh detailed representation before respondent no. 4 within a period of six weeks. If such representation is filed, respondent no. 4 is directed to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing all the grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. The respondent no. 4 if considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to clear all the retiral dues of the petitioner within the aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, the respondent no. 4 is directed to pass a speaking order within the aforesaid time. The petitioner shall also be entitled to get admissible statutory interest on delayed payment. With above observation and direction the petition stands disposed of. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)