1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.2963 OF 2008 Ms.Nehas Panditrao Bhailume. ...Petitioner. Vs. Chief Manager, Sevak Co-operative Bank Ltd., Satara & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr.K. S. Bapat with Mr.Saurabh Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr. S.S. Pakale with Mr. K.J. Phakade for the Respondents. ..... CORAM :DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. April 28, 2008. P.C.: The services of the Petitioner are admittedly transferable and in the reply filed to the complaint by the First and Second Respondents, there is a reference to the fact that the Petitioner had served at Branches of the Bank at Satara, Ahmednagar, Karjat and Hadapsar from time to time. The Petitioner moved the Industrial Court only on an apprehension that she is likely to be transferred. The Industrial Court has correctly declined to grant interim relief. The approach of the Industrial Court is consistent with the law laid down in Wimco Ltd. vs. Wimco Employees' Union, 2001 III CLR. 803. No 2 case for interference is made out for injuncting the employer from the exercise of the power to transfer which is a normal incident of service. The Petition is dismissed. ......