IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 2ND JANUARY 2009 / 12TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 63 of 2009(G) ----------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- NARAYANAN, THALAKKATT HOUSE, EDAPPAL P.O MALAPPURAM BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 63 of 2009 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of January, 2008 J U D G M E N T petitioner submits that by Ext.P1, he sought revision of his timings. It is stated that Ext.P1 has been acknowledged as per Ext.P2 dated 5.9.2008. Despite that his request for revision has not been considered. It is with that grievance the writ petition has been filed. 2. If as stated by the petitioner Ext.P1 has been received as is seen form Ext.P2, there is no reason why the matter should remain unattended, Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the first respondent shall consider Ext.P1 request for revision of timings on an expeditious basis and at any rate within 3 months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. vi (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE