IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33178 of 2010 MD.ZAFAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 15.11.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P. for the State assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant. Petitioner is the husband of the complainant and that he used to torture the complainant on account of non- fulfillment of dowry demand. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the marriage of the petitioner was solemnized in the year, 2003 but as a matter of fact they had strained relation with each other and ultimately the petitioner divorced the complainant which is evident from perusal of Annexure-3 and he has also paid the Dain mehar amount to the complainant through bank draft. On the other hand, learned counsel for the complainant submits that the aforesaid document is nothing but creation of his husband in order to save his skin. In that view of the matter, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected. 2 However, petitioner is directed to surrender before the court below and seek regular bail within thirty days from the date of communication of this order to the concerned court and if the petitioner so surrenders before the court below the court below shall consider the regular bail petition on its own merit without being prejudiced by this rejection order. Anilkr.sinha (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)