SlMfi? P "a'StSi.s: SStS'iU C-^IC^l^- IMTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S)No. 1i-& / 2007 PETIT10NER ..•;.c^ "<,. -•'^^r LA- s^ 'fV'--^-" f" S- y^y Luman Singh Nirmalkar S/o. - Late Shri Domar Singh Aged about - 22 years R/o- Village Tawera , Tahsil- Gunderdehi, Distt.- Durg (C.G.) sy RESPONDENTS VERSUS -1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, PublicWorks Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (B/R) Balod Division Balod, Distt.- Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. HIW COURT OF CHHAtriSftWH AT BILASPUR W.P(SlNo. 9Z6<rf2007 Single BuachsHon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Petitioner Respondents Versus Lum<m Singh Nirmolkor State of CWwttisgarh <md another Present; Mr. Anup Mcyumdar, counael for the petitioner. Ms. Oeepoli Pondey,Panel Lawyer for the Stttfe/re^ondents. CftOER 0>ossed on 19th Doy of Febniary, 2007) It is one of the unfoThinate cases where the petitioner has rushed to this Court immediately after filirg an opplication on 14.11.2006 for compassionate appointment. 2. The petitioner ought to have uwated for arfficient time as the office has to require imestigation cdaout divest conditions of the dependent of the deceased and other factors, asto whether the petithMier is entitled to comptssionute appointment or not. 3. It is well settled principte of law thut compassionate q>pointment is not by Nfay of right. It onwunts to bock door enhy. 4. Be that os it moy, the petitioner is at liberty to move oppropriate authority for deciding his representation expeditfousty. In the event, if some representotion is pwiding •the same be wnsidered os oqwditiously as possible within o period of eight weeks from the date of o receipt of copy of this order. 5. Thus, -the frit petitton is disposed of with above stated liberty. No order as to costs. —— — Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge