HIGH COURT OF ‘ : " PETITIONER i RS: ESPONDENT W) 734 fo .P.(_C No. 6 p201 L1 3.12.201 he ét oner is aggrieved w e orc a 6.2.21vassed'i vn e No O7 A174 ear 2010-11 b the Additiohal ehs‘ rang, est ran lct Ralpur The Impuc ned order reads as une — /11 I 1 Il- 1 W W12£raé%|wggf%aq% wewewzraws‘egwmdmed ; g Von , behalf, of the petitio gne ‘ p b t t' of heanngsto the etitioner He sumits h hi wnotlce In this matte was firstly issued by/the Panchayat ereaer ' rm learne counsel ap ubmlts that the c cerne Addona a pd ' the r has asse x a reasonable opportunity of hearmg wa horrtytothe petitioner , , r y Govt Advocatexappearing on behal tiapiia herste/r‘esonder‘t‘spl T thL me " siidarrereis.stat'utdry é Cg \ ORALORDER¥ ( 0) - T p ith th ier dted 100pni ReJue Cas y 20 y T’ildar3 A Thl Ag, _ _r dr “62/200 'WW w mi fln ner ' pud Mr S C Vea d pe s d ml Te t Thft TV s t ' D f -W.P.(C) No._74 bf 10 36 20 e m:ay have filed an objection uls 32 of the Land Revenue Code beforeth efisildar itself but without doing all this the petitioner has rushed to this Couit by fiing thls writ petition Therefore In VIevY of the efficaCIous alternative remedies avaliable to the petitioner the pettion may be dismissed at th admISSion stage itself. i Mr. Verma, in view of the preiimina objection taen y e ae otijnsei also agrees that there are statutory remedies under the Land eiienue Code, 1959 and the petitioner is ready to avail those remedies: owever he submits that even without ganting breathing time to the etitioner the Tehsildar has passed the orders for removal of the possessmn f the petitioner from the disputed land by app ying police force He shows the opy of the order dated 10 122010 passed by the concerned Additional ehsildar in this regard He submits that the petitioner may be permitted to vaillstatutory remedy but for the time being some protection may be granted o that the petitioner may not be thrown out from the portions of their land in uch a manner which is arbitrary and illegal l i have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and have also erused the records of the writ petition After passmg the aforesaid order on 6 12 2010 the concerned authority as passed an order dated 10 12 2010 which reads as under - i i l l ”10/12/2010 1. marital 2. mammah/u/manmmowtsiwm mammibnmwwan i Wwmmwwmmlnlaw l Wumwwmwsimmww @15/12/201oan1200m%=inmvna7nl Wmmmmmmnwwgm l Wmwwmmmiwmm Winnwwmmitianwwnwnsgw x waibunbrlaanwaohoaomm wmiwmwmwmsgwm sh" i @a ’3 §_ §L ‘ After passing the said orders, now the concerned authority has directed hat on 15 12 2010 the possession of the petitioner would be removed with thé elp of the police force ln the above facts and Circumstances of the case and n View of the fact that there is effective efficacwus statutory remedy against he order dated 6 12 2010 l deem it aroriate to disosed of this petition at l ll 'l i l l 3 h e T e k b th Stt C R H p o c T a s s p h t h i t ppp p thls stage With Ilberty to the petitioner to avall statutory remedy against th order dated 6 12 2010, the petlticner Is ree to avall the remedy avarlable to h 5 days from today He woul also be free to pra for interim protection before th concerned authority against the orders dated 2 n 10 12 ; It Is directed that In the meanwhlle tre orders passed by the al ehsuidar le order dated 6 12 2010 as also order dated 10 12 2010 shal eain stayed for a eriod of one month from oa Wih the ar t p td flly i i t foesaid observations/directions the wn etition sans ina dd f ispose o l is made clear that tis Court as not expresse any oinion on meri f the case and the case of the etitioner shall be disosed o y oncerned authority on its own merits in accordance With Iaw Sd/— Sunil Kum‘ar Sinha Judge W 7346 f 01 .P.(C) No. o 20 e f m? under the Land Revenue Code or any ot er remedy wuthln a period of 1 d e 12 010 ad 2010 3 Nb ‘ T l rm p tdy 4 @ t h h d p ts o p p f b the c . i a