1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3455 OF 2010 (Shri Ankush Parasram Jadhao vs. Deputy Director of Education, Nagpur and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 19, 2011 Heard Shri Shende, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Shri Fulzele, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos. 1 and 2, and Shri Khajanchi, learned Counsel for the respondent nos. 3 and 4. The petition is directed against the order dated 16/4/2010 passed by the Deputy Director of Education, Nagpur and the operative part of the said order, which pertains to the petitioner, reads thus : “As per the orders of this Office dated 29/12/2004, Shri Jadhao was granted an approval 2 as Shikshan Sevak, on the honorarium of Rs.4000/-. Since the School is situated in Tribal area and therefore the second section of 11 th and 12 th Standard (Arts) came to be admitted on 100% grant-in-aid basis, from the academic session 2003-04. Therefore, the Scheme of Shikshan Sevak is applicable to the appointment of Shri Jadhao.” Shri Shende, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that since Management is permitted to start XI and XII Standard (Arts) in the concerned Junior College, which is admitted to hundred per cent grant-in-aid, the claim of the petitioner needs to be considered for appointment as a Junior College Lecturer. It is not in dispute that the petitioner was appointed way back in the year 2003 vide order dated 5/12/2003 as Shikshan Sevak under the scheme floated by the State Government. The petitioner had not raised grievance of any kind for seven years in respect of his appointment as Shikshan Sevak. It is also not in dispute that on the earlier occasion, the 3 petitioner filed Writ Petition No.3392/2009 in this Court for the same relief, which is claimed in the present petition and the said petition was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 3/12/2009. It is in these circumstances, we are not inclined to show any indulgence in the present petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE khj