IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11899 of 2005 SUSHIL IGNATIUS MINZ Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 1.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Admitted position is that the petitioner now has been allocated Jharkhand cadre and he is an employee of Jharkhand State. The prayer or the relief which he is seeking now is for the Jharkhand State to adjudicate. None of the cause of action raised in the present writ application is required to the adjudicated by the Patna High Court. Petitioner has the benefit of High Court exercising jurisdiction independently over the State of Jharkhand where this matter can be agitated. Without expressing any opinion on the merit, this writ application is dismissed due to lack of territorial jurisdiction. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)