IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.79 of 2011 BINOD KUMAR SINGH S/O RAJESHWAR PRASAD SINGH, R/O VILL- BHAGVANPUR, P.S BHAGVANPUR, DIST. KAIMUR, BHABHUA --- PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COMMISSIONER, PATNA DIVISION, PATNA. 3. THE COLLECTOR, SHAHABAD, ARA 4. THE COLLECTOR, ROHTAS 5. THE COLLECTOR, KAIMUR AT BHABHUA ---RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02 06.01.2011 Heard the parties. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition for the following relief(s):- “That, this is an application for issuance of writ in nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ/ Writs or order/orders or direction/directions to the corresponding respondent the Collector, Kaimur at Bhabhua (Respondent no.5) to direct to confer the Muavaza/redressal amount with 12% interest of the entire lands number 1/3 share Gauri Shankar Singh and Number ¼,1/6,1/7,1/9, 1/11 and 1/12 combined samilat) of Register number 373, pargana Chainpur, Police Station- Bhabhua, Thana Number-904 District Shahabad (Annexure-1) which was acquired/ seized by the Government of Bihar at the time of abolishment of Zamindari but the Muavaza/ redressal amount of this lands was not conferred till now, whereby and whereunder the petitioner is much aggrieved and the action done by the competent Authorities are bad in law and unnatural .” Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the lands belonging to him were acquired by the State respondent soon after vesting of Zamindari. Such issue is now being raised for the first time before this Court after several decades. I am afraid in view of the prayer made in the application based on the 2 pleadings made in support thereof any relief can be granted to the writ petitioner by invocation of writ jurisdiction. The application has no merit. It is, accordingly, dismissed. At this stage learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be approaching the Court of competent jurisdiction for the relief. Petitioner is at liberty to do so. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)