IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.3861 of 2011 Date of Decision : March 04, 2011. Balkar Singh .....Petitioner versus Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Manish Prabhakar, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner was charge-sheeted for misappropriation of the public funds and committing fraud to the tune of Rs.12,229/- besides committing gross irregularities in the submission of Computer Cash Realization Statement. The petitioner's reply was found unsatisfactory and the disciplinary authority vide order dated 8.8.2006 (Annexure P-2) imposed a minor penalty of stoppage of his three annual increments without future effect besides recording 'doubtful integrity' in his annual confidential report. The petitioner went in departmental appeal which has also been turned down by passing a self-speaking order. It appears that the petitioner still felt aggrieved and made a representation followed by a legal notice dated 15.10.2010 (Annexure P-6) C.W.P.No .3861 of 2011 2 which are stated to be under consideration. Though the petitioner has not pointed out any provisions under the Rules regarding maintainability of the 2nd representation/appeal, nevertheless it is for the respondents to take an appropriate decision on his representation in accordance with law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and dispose of the petitioner's above mentioned representation/legal notice in accordance with Rules by passing a speaking order as early as possible and preferably within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. March 04, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE