bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.202 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.557 OF 2008 Alok Omprakash Varma ..Appellant Vs. Nashik Municipal Corporation & Anr. ..Respondents Mr.V.Z.Kankaria for appellant. Mr.M.L.Patil for respondent No.1. Mr.Umesh Mankapure for respondent No.2. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA,J. DATE : 1ST SEPTEMBER, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Perused appeal. 2. Learned Counsel for the appellant fairly states that no permission was obtained at any time from the Municipal Corporation or the Development Authority for constructing the structure on the plot. He further submits that he is a tenant of the plot owned by defendant No.2. The Corporation had given a notice of demolition of structure which was illegal. The suit for declaration and injunction has been dismissed, wherein and whereby the notice of the Corporation directing the demolition of the structure was held to be legal. Since the plaintiff did not prove that the structure was backed by the permission by the Corporation or by the Development Authority, the concurrent findings of facts recorded by both the Courts below cannot be faulted. Appeal raises no substantial question of law. In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed with no order as to costs. 3. In view of dismissal of the appeal, civil application also stands dismissed. (V.C.DAGA,J.)