IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39324 of 2010 1. UMANATH PD. 2. DEVI LAL PD. @ DEVI PRASAD 3. RUNKA DEVI 4. JITAN PD. ------------------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16.3.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of anticipatory bail application. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Injury to the informant, according to learned counsel for the petitioners, does not justify constitution of offence under section 308 IPC. Allegation under Bihar Prevention of Witch Practices Act, 1999 is denied. His further submission is about resolving all the differences in between the parties. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, District 2 Patna in Khajekalan P.S. Case No. 41/10, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)