IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25468 of 2009 RAJ KUMAR @ AKASH @ KHUS NANDAN SON OF SUBH NARAIN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GHANGHTI, P.S. CHAKIA, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR 3 29.10.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged is under section 380 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that although the petitioner is not named in the first information report, however he has been implicated in this case during the course of investigation. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal history. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State submits that the petitioner has given his confessional statement recorded in paragraph 93 of the case diary and on his statement the alleged stolen motorcycle was recovered from the possession of the co-accused Sanjay Kumar Mahato. As such, the participation of the petitioner is very much clear in the alleged crime. Considering the nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner and the materials placed before the Court, I am not inclined to grant bail to this petitioner. His prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)