IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36759 of 2010 PUSHPLAL KUAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 04.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Informant’s daughter reportedly was kidnapped. Submission of the learned counsel for petitioner is that either she was kidnapped by co-accused Raj Kumar kurmi petitioner’s servant or eloped with him. In any case, there is no direct hand of the petitioner. Petitioner if hatched up any conspiracy that only due to enmity which appeared in statement recorded in course of trial. Summons is issued and petitioner apprehends his arrest which never can be justified. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-II, Chapra, District- Saran in connection with Sessions Trial No.603 of 2009 arising out of Panapur P.S. Case No.08 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)