IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.959 OF 2009 AND MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (REST) ST.NO.10762 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.428 OF 2009(D). 1. VIJAY TUKARAM DHAPODKAR .. PETITIONER/S. VERSUS 1. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTH. .. RESPONDENT/S. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Shri S.R.Narnaware, Advocate for Applicant/Petitioner. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI,JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 03, 2009. 1. Heard learned Advocate for the applicant/ petitioner and learned A.G.P. Shri Patel for respondents. 2. Accepting the reasons stated in the application towards delay in filing of application for restoration, as well as reasons towards absence leading to consequential dismissal of the writ petition, to be satisfactory, both the applications are allowed. Writ Petition No.428/2009 is restored to file. JUDGE JUDGE RR. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.428 OF 2009. 1. VIJAY TUKARAM DHAPODKAR .. PETITIONER/S. VERSUS 1. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTH. .. RESPONDENT/S. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Shri S.R.Narnaware, Advocate for Applicant/Petitioner. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI,JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 03, 2009. 1.Learned Advocate Shri Narnaware for the petitioner states that he has filed application Stamp No.15964 of 2009 for grant of permission to withdraw the petition. 2.The application is allowed. Consequently, the petition is dismissed, as withdrawn. JUDGE JUDGE RR.