IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 1068 Of 2009 Prahlad Singh Rawat …………..Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & Another ………….Respondents Mr. Manish Arora, learned counsel for the Petitioner. Mr. Nandan Arya, learned A.G.A. for respondent no. 1 and 2 Mr. S.K.Shandilya , learned counsel for respondent no.3.. Dated: December 11th , 2009 Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Heard Sri Manish Arora, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Nandan Arya, learned A.G.A. for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Sri S.K.Shandilya, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3. Admittedly writ petition (criminal) Nos. 734/2009 and 735/2009 filed by the co-accused were dismissed vide order dated 24.8.2009. Contents of the F.I.R. make out prima facie case, hence I find no special reason in the present matter to take contrary view from the view taken by Coordinate Bench of this court while dismissing earlier writ petitions. Writ petition is dismissed. C.L.M.A. No. 10798/2009 stands disposed of accordingly. (Alok Singh, J.) 11.12.2009 Nishant