IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.975 of 2009 Mahboob Azim Versus Shafique Ahmad ---------------------------------- 9 21.12.2011 Mr. Anisur Rahman, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that by the impugned order the prayer for amendment by the objector/plaintiff has been allowed and as such the impugned order is interlocutory in nature and therefore, the revision application is not maintainable and he may be permitted to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The learned counsel for the opposite party is present and there is no objection. The prayer is allowed. The petitioner is granted four weeks time to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, failing which this revision application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. Md. Ibrarul ( V. Nath, J.)