IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.887 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Twinkle @ Tinku ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: October 4, 2010 __________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.196/2010 U/s 302 IPC P.S. Kotwali Haridwar, District Haridwar ______________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. Navneet Kaushik, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is not named in the FIR and the case rests upon the circumstantial evidence and the chain of circumstances is not complete against the applicant to connect him with the said crime. He further submitted that the only evidence against the applicant is the confessional statement of the applicant, recorded in the police custody, which is not admissible as per law. After considering all the facts and circumstances; on hearing learned counsel for the parties; on perusal of the contents of FIR and other papers available on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Twinkle @ Tinku be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Haridwar. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 4.10.2010 RG