IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No.318 of 2010(O&M) Mohinder Pal Kapoor .....Petitioner VERSUS Nagar Mal ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. K.S. Boparai, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Chadha, Advocate, for the respondent. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has impugned order of discharge passed by the Court of Magistrate. Initially, the petitioner filed an appeal, which on objection being raised by the Registry, was treated as a revision petition. Once the petitioner concedes that revision is maintainable, then he has to file a revision, at the first instance, before the Court of Sessions. Let the petitioner file revision before the Court of Sessions. The petitioner would be at liberty to move an application for seeking condonation of delay on the ground that he was pursuing remedy before this Court. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. December 07, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE