1 Wp4874-10 dmt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4874 OF 2010 Shri Prince Shivaji Maratha Boarding House’s College of Architecture, Kolhapur, Through its Principal S.G. Dige. ... Petitioner. V/s. Shivaji University, Kolhapur & Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. V.M. Thorat for petitioner. Mr. Amit Boarkar for respondent nos. 1. Mr. A.V. Bukhari i/by Rahul Nerlekar for respondent no. 4. Ms. M.P. Thakur, AGP for respondent nos. 2 & 3. CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR & A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATE : 11th MARCH, 2011 P.C. The learned counsel for the petitioner-institution states that the petitioner institution would like to make a representation to the university pointing out that the appointment of Mr. S.G. Dige was an appointment as per the norms laid down under the Council of Architecture Act and the rules and regulations framed thereunder and that the AICTE norms are not applicable to the concerned employee. At this stage, without expressing any opinion, we permit the petitioner to make appropriate representation to the University and the University may take appropriate decision to find out whether the appointment of Mr. Dige was an appointment made 2 Wp4874-10 as per the norms laid down under the Council of Architecture Act and whether the concerned principal was qualified to be appointed as per the norms laid down under the Council of Architecture Act and whether the provisions of the Council of Architecture Act or the norms of AICTE are applicable. If the representation is made within a period of two weeks from today, the University may take a decision in this behalf within a period of two weeks thereafter. Whatever may be the decision, the same may be communicated to the petitioner immediately. We once again repeat that we have expressed no opinion on the merits of the matter. In view of what is stated above, the petition stands disposed of. (A.A.SAYED, J.) (P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)