============================================================== FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 398 OF 2004. APPLICATION NO. 398 OF 2004. APPLICATION NO. 398 OF 2004. IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3475 OF 1992. PETITION NO. 3475 OF 1992. PETITION NO. 3475 OF 1992. ============================================================== Mr. B.K. Raje for the applicant. Ms. Betty D’Souza i/b M/s. M.M. Vashi & Associates for the respondent. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED: 18TH JULY, 2005. P.C.: . Heard counsel for the parties. As there is no objection to bring the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner on the record and considering the averments made in the Civil Application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c) and (d). . Parties to take effective steps within two weeks. . Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]