1 wp1382.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 1382 of 2011 Shri Nivrutti Vithal Bhunde ... Petitioner v/s. Shri Vithal Raghu Bhunde & ors. ... Respondents Mr. Ashok B. Tajane for the petitioner. Mr. D.S. Patil for the respondents. CORAM:- B.R. GAVAI, J DATED :- MARCH 24, 2011. P.C. The petition challenges purely an interlocutary order dated 11th January, 2010 thereby rejecting the application filed by the present petitioner for amendment of the plaint. 2. Learned Counsel Shri Dani submits that though the application is filed to be one under Order 6 Rule 17, in effect it is under Order I Rule 10 of the CPC. He submits that as such the learned trial Judge has erred in rejecting the application. 2 wp1382.11.sxw 3. No perversity could be noticed with the reasonings given in the order which as already observed is purely interlocutory in nature. 4. In any way if the petitioner does not succeed in the suit and is required to file an appeal, he can challenge the said order in view of provisions of Order 43 Rule 1(a) of CPC. Rejected. (B.R. GAVAI, J)