wwm Mmmmmmmammwmmammmmm%nwmmm Mmmmwwmmmmhmnmu wwwwq wmmwwmww. Ewx k uQwgw mmmwmmmmu \kmmwmwm mmmm“ mam”wmmmmmm mummr i} .i . a mmmmmm ammwuu may Emwmmdw Em? Emwwam? §mm$ Em? mmmwgr mum. Mwmmmwm .aun A.° u .oa mmmwma%mmwmmmmmmw? wwwmmmw wm mmnwmmmwwo mmm mwmwam?mmmwaw m :m. MW «amwqEmwmmr mmwwwqgmmm.‘ ‘ MWWnmmmmN mmmmmmmmq www.m«wm mama m§wawwag wEwg mmmmaqMmxg v Mwm mwmmawu mwu w w Jm mmwqmmmmwmr wanwzw ?. ‘ aw mmmwmw mmwmmmwa. mwbmmwmwmnmmmmmm wmamwmmmmmm mmmwmwma. mwmwmw wmwmw. mm. r5? mmmmwmMn.m.w “2nEwe mammwmmmwwwmmm mmnrm ”mmwmnwm. mam" #mgmu: PE. mmmma. mwawmm mmmwe... Wmwmmmmm mwwmm %mwnmwm mmm m.mmwmmwmmmmmmwmmwmmm mm mmwww %mmmmmmwwmm mm” Wmwmmmmwwam wmwmmwm mammmwEam mam ¥ mmmwwm m é% HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 4476 of2004 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. A ‘ otri. J. Present. Shn S C Verma, Advocate for the petltmner Shn Arun Sao Government Advocate for the State O R D E R (Passed on 09d; day of December, 201 1) l ‘ 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner: on instructions, submits ( that nothing survives in this petition for adjudication as the petition , . has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side does not controvert the above submission. 3. In View of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become / inhuctuous. Sd/_ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge \ \ ,_ / PETrrIONER : De‘vesh Patel. VERSUS RRSPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh 8c Others.