IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3856 OF 2010 (Smt. Vimal Prakash Rathod vs. The Returning/ Election Officer, G.P. Yavatmal & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. AUGUST 17, 2010. Heard Shri A.M. Mane Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner. The nomination paper of the petitioner is rejected only because the water charges payable to Maharashtra Jivan Pradhikaran are in arrears. The learned counsel contends that under Section 14(1)(h) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958, nomination paper can be rejected only if the arrears are in relation to local authority. Mrs. Wasnik, learned AGP for respondent No.1 has contended that arrears of Maharashtra Jivan Pradhikaran are paid after scrutiny. It is apparent that there were some arrears on the last date prescribed for making of nomination. I am, therefore, not inclined to interfere in writ jurisdiction. However, the petitioner is at liberty to raise his grievance before the appropriate forum in accordance with law after the elections are over. Writ Petition is rejected. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.