IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8985 of 2010 RAGHUBAR NARAIN PRASAD SON OF LATE HIRA LAL, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA –LODIPUR, BUDHA MARG, POLICE STATION GANDHI MAIDAN, DISTRICT – PATNA 800001 Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH COMMISISONER-CUM- SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT, NEW SECRETARIATE, PATNA 2. PATNA REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (DISSOLVED) PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH CITY COMMISISONER. 3. CITY COMMISSIONER, PATNA REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (DISSOLVED PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MAURYA LOK COMPLEX, BLOCK – C 2ND FLOOR, DAKBUNGLOW ROAD, PATNA -1. 4. CONTROLLER OF FINANCE ACCOUNTS PATNA REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (DISSOLVED PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MAURYA LOK COMPLEX, BLOCK – c 2ND FLOOR, DAKBUNGLOW ROAD, PATNA – 800001. ----------- 02. 21.05.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the respondent no. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 30th of September 2000 from the post of Senior Selection Grade Assistant, although retiral dues have been paid on the old scale, however soon after the implementation of the 6th Pay Revision the pensionary benefits are required to be fixed accordingly. It is further submitted that on issuance of the notification dated 25th of June 2003 with regard to the grant of first assured career progression vide Annexure-4 petitioner has not been given the benefit of the same to which he was entitled with the result petitioner is not receiving the full retiral dues despite representation as contained in Annexure–6. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 3 submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 3. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of eight weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. However, upon consideration if any of the claims or part of the claim is found not admissible the same shall be informed to the petitioner with reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. JAGDISH/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)