1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.175 OF 2002 IN WRIT PETITION NO.785 OF 1989 K.S.Srinivasan, Bombay .. Petitioner Vs. N.Raghunathan and Anr. .. Respondents Mrs.Pramila S.Bhaingade i/b Mr.Janardhan for the petitioner Mr.D.G.Bagwe for respondent nos.2 CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL & & & K.K.TATED, JJ. K.K.TATED, JJ. K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED : 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 DATED : 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 DATED : 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 P.C.: 1. Mr.Bagwe, the learned counsel for respondent nos.2 states that he has taken out this Notice of Motion seeking identical relief as respondent no.1. On 01.08.08, this court has disposed of Notice of Motion No.303 of 2002 taken out by respondent no.1 and it was clearly expressed that the order which is sought to be set aside on the ground that it was an exparte order, this court 2 has observed that the parties will have to seek review of the said order as it is on merits. Therefore, the present Notice of Motion which is seeking identical relief does not survive. 2. In view of our order dated 01.08.08, passed in Notice of Motion No.303 of 2002, parties are at liberty to seek review subject to limitation. With aforesaid observation, Notice of Motion stands dismissed. ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( K.K. TATED, J ) ( K.K. TATED, J ) ( K.K. TATED, J )