IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-26322 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.10.2011. Sita and another ..Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Satyavir Singh Yadav, D.A.G., Haryana, for respondents No.1 to 4 – State. NAWAB SINGH, J. (ORAL) By filing this petition, petitioners seek direction to respondents No.2 to 4 to take action against respondents No.5 to 7 in case bearing First Information Report No.395 dated November 17th, 2010, under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Police Station Palam Vihar, District Gurgaon. State has filed reply. Learned State counsel has stated that prior to the registration of the FIR, statement of Ram Surat-petitioner No.2 (father of Sangita-deceased) (Annexure R-1) was recorded wherein, he has stated that his daughter was ill. He received a information and reached his house and there he found his daughter in a fainted condition. She was brought to Vinayak Hospital where she was declared brought dead. Post mortem examination was conducted and Dr. Bhim Singh of Babu Jagiwan Ram Memorial Hospital, Jahangir Puri, Delhi vide his report dated April 19th, 2011 (Annexure R-3) opined that Sangeeta-daughter of the petitioner died on account of head injury, which could be possible due to fall on rough surface and possibility of epilepsy could also not be ruled out and it was a natural death. There was no evidence of rape prior to her death. Above being the position, no further action is required. Disposed of accordingly. 20.10.2011 (NAWAB SINGH) neetu JUDGE