IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 41 OF 2011 IN SUO MOTU WRIT PETITION NO. 2 OF 2007 SHAIKH ABDUL SAYED ... Applicant Versus QUEPEM MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH CHIEF OFFICER AND ORS., ... Respondents Mr. S. S. Kakodkar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. N. K. Sawaikar, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. M. D. Salkar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocate for respondent No.3. Coram:- S.B. DESHMUKH & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 19th January, 2011 P.C.:- We have heard learned Counsel for the respective parties. Counsel appearing for the applicant presents an affidavit which is marked by letter "A" for identification. Taken on record. Copies of the same have been served to the Counsel appearing for the respective respondents. An undertaking is given in this affidavit which reads : "I undertake to comply the provisions of Rule 27 of Goa, Daman & Diu Municipal Council Building Bylaws 1987." 2. After hearing the learned Counsel for the respective parties, in our view, this application can be allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) in view of the affidavit/undertaking given by the applicant. 3. The Misc. Civil Application accordingly is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed of. S.B. DESHMUKH, J. F. M. REIS, J. ssm.