IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 17992 of 2005 Between: Gadadhar Educational Society, Manisha College of Nursing Nathayyapalem, Behind Shellanagar, Visakhapatnam District, rep. by its Secretary & Correspondent, V. Vijaya Kumar Raju, S/o. V.C.S.Raju, Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Prl., Secretary to the Govt of A.P., Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Director of Medical Education, A.P., Sultan Bazar, Koti, Hyderabad. 3 The Registrar, NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada. 4 The Registrar, A.P. Nursing Council, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to declare the action of the respondents from 1 to 3 herein, in not considering the application dt. 20.11.2004 of the petitioner college for seeking permission to shift the college from 90- MSN Colony, Vijayanagaram to Nathayyapalem, behind shellanagar, Visakhapatnam District, and not granting provisional aﬃliation to the academic year 2005-2006, on the ground that the college is shifted without prior permission, as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondents to consider the application dt. 20.11.2005 for shifting of the college and grant provisional aﬃliation for the academic year 2005-2006 and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.ANDAPALLI SANJEEV KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.D.V.NAGARJUNA BABU The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.17992 OF 2005 ORDER: Gadadhar Educational Society, petitioner herein, is running Manisha College of Nursing at Vizianagaram. The said college made a representation, dated 20.11.2004, requesting ﬁrst respondent to ratify their action in shifting their premises from Vizianagaram to Visakhapatnam. As the same was not considered and disposed of, petitioner ﬁled instant writ petition seeking a direction to respondents to consider the application. This Court while admitting the writ petition on 12.08.2005 passed interim orders directing respondents to consider the application of petitioner, dated 20.11.2004, and pass appropriate orders. In that view of the matter, the relief sought by petitioner has been substantially granted, nothing survives in the writ petition. The writ petition is therefore dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ (V.V.S.RAO,J) 11.11.2008. pln