-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6365 OF 2005 Smt.Vandana Panditrao Agale..Petitioner Versus The Nashik Merchants Co-op.Bank Ltd. & Ors. ......Respondents Mrs. Vaishali Kadam, for the Petitioner Mr. C.R. Sonawane, for the Respondent No.2. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DATE : 28th September, 2005 DATE : 28th September, 2005 DATE : 28th September, 2005 P.C.: . Rule. Heard forthwith. In view of the order to be passed no notice has been given to the Respondent No.1. 2. The petitioner has a remedy by way of Revision. Apart from that the petitioner had made a statement through her Advocate that they will deposit the amount within two months from 6th April, 2005. However, considering the controversy the petitioner is given four weeks to prefer Revision Application. The respondents are directed not to proceed to sell the attached property till then. With the above direction Writ Petition disposed of. In the event the petitioner does not preferred a Revision Application within four weeks and deposited the amount as required, it will be open to the respondents to take steps to sell the property. (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.) -2- (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)