IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 12332 of 2011 Date of decision October 18, 2011 Vijay Saini ....... Petitioner Versus The Registrar, Firms and Societies, Haryana and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Ashwani Bakhshi , Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Kirti Singh, DAG., Haryana. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Counsel for the State says that the election had been held and the petitioner himself has been elected as President. Having regard to the subsequent event, counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition may be treated as having been rendered infructuous. 2. As ordered. 3. The writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE October 18, 2011 archana