ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1892 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 1892 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 1892 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.Madhav Jamdar for the Petitioner. Mr.S.U.Kamdar i/by M/s. Harish Joshi & Co. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 14th October, 2008. : 14th October, 2008. : 14th October, 2008. P.C P.C P.C . . The Petitioner has challenged the order dated 26th February, 2008, whereby the landlord’s Application for amendment, filed in the pending Appeal was rejected by observing that the same shall be decided alongwith the merits of the Appeal. 2. Considering the reasoning given, I am not inclined to interfere in the Writ Petition. However, it is desirable that this Application be heard prior in time so that appropriate steps can be taken by either of the parties even on merits of the matter. 3. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. ( 2 ) [ ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]