*1* arbap.114.08.sxw kps I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.114 OF 2008 Govardhani Construction Company. ..Applicant -VERSUS- Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and others. ..Respondents. .... Mr.S.B. Pawar a/w Ms.Swati Sawant i/b M/s S.K.Legal Associates for the Applicant. Mr.R.P. Chavan i/b M/s Little & Company for the Respondent No.1. .... CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 30th July, 2010. P.C. 1 It is not contested that the disputes and differences between the parties are covered by the arbitration agreement. 2 Although the arbitration had been invoked in the year 2005, I see no reason to deviate from the arbitration clause which requires the disputes to be decided by the Chief Engineer of MIDC. 3 In the circumstances, this application is disposed of by directing the Respondent No.1 to appoint one of it’s Chief Engineer as a Sole Arbitrator in respect of the disputes and differences between the Applicant and the Respondent No.1. There is no arbitration agreement between the Applicant and other Respondents. -