blNN" HSGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Wrft Petition (S) No. 1941 of2008 Petitioner Versus Respondents 1. Ramkaran Harbansh, S/o Shri Pyare Lat Harbansh, Age about 51 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Satounl, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Education & Tribal Department. D.K.S. Btevan, Raipur. (C.G.) Djstrtet Education Officer, Otett. -- Raipur WRIT PETITOIN UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF tNDIA Sjngle Bench : Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Smitha Ghai, Panel Lawyerfor the responctents. ORALORDER (Passed on this 1^ day of Aprii, 2008) The petitioner was appointed initiaSly, on a flxed pay of Rs. 100/-. The petitioner was thereafter, granted regular pay scale on completion of the probation period. The question of iaw jnvolved herein is, asto whether the petitioner is entitted to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of jnitial appointment or from the date of compSetion of probation period. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as (eamed counsel appearing for the respondents/State, jointly submit that the facte and question of law, involved in the present writ petition, are the same asto that of in W. P. (S) No. 3566/2007 (Loknath Patel Vs. State of ChhatBsgarh & others), which was allowed vide order dated 27.6.2007. ^^^F^ -"/'^.^":^ /.-- ^- Thakur 4. In view of the above-stated submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ pet'rtion js disposed of in the same terms i.e. petitioner Ss en^tled for regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of jnitiaJ appointment, subject to verification of the facts. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge