• L< / 1-, ^ ^- f)\- '%)' S'Ke,f^| E RFasf!t: c-F i-^l^ G) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. <sct^ / 2006 PETITIONER'S -/)r / ^yy/ rw/ //^y ^" 4. 5. Dilsingh Markande, S/o. Shri Sukhau Ram Markande, aged about 43 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School - Khalari, Block - Dondi, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) Ishwar Lal Basen, S/o. Shri Nakul Ram Basen, aged about - 47 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary. School, Jabudwahi, Block - Dondi, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) Suresh Kumar, S/o. Shri R.N. Prasad, aged about 44 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School-Chikli , Block - Dondi, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) Anjori Ram Sahu, S/o. Shri Banau Ram, aged about 50 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School - Borid Block - Dondi, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) Roop Ram Sahu, S/o. , SFiri- Bhisham Lal Sahu, aged about 49 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt., Primary School- Dhobni (B) Block - Dondi, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) / 6. 7. 8. Amar Kumar Sahy, S/o. Shri Channu Lal Sahu, aged about 44 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School- Gujra, Block - Dondi, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) Puran Lal Sinha, S/o. Shri Rameshwar Singh Sinha, aged about 41 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School- Gujra, Block - Dondi, Distt.- Durg (C.G.) Manna Lal Sahu, S/o. Shri Biram Lal Sahu, aged about 44 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School - Bhaisbod, Block- Dondi, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT'S e- !i&l >»iiLXS'(^. !*i| ^^r^^ 1. State of Chhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary Department of Tribal Welfare D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Commissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, Chhattisgarh Government Raipur 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, District- Durg (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Block - Dondi, Distt.- Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22ei@g/3.0F CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT, WRITS, DIRECT10N ETC, TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. '^:&-^"SsS's^^&^^ ^i"ST^^?g5' HI6H COURT OF CHHAmSCARH AT BI1ASPUR W. P.fSl No. 6908 <rf 2006 Petitfoners : bilsh^i AAcrkonde A o-thers Versus Respondents : State of Chhorttis9arh & olhers SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. Ay<hotri. J Preaent: Shri A.S. Rajput, Advocort®for 1lie petitioners. Shri &ishil Oubey,. fiovemment Advocate fer •the respondents/State. OR&ER O'assed on -t+iis 20t11 day of (Secember, 2006) The fottowing order of the Courl- is passed by Satish K. Agrrihotri. J. 1. Usamed counsel appearing for •the petitioners as alSB for the Stnte/respondents jointly ftibmit •that Ihe facts of Ihe present case are similar to that of in W. P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Thiwri and others vs. State 6ovt. of Chharttisgurh & o'thers), which wws allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006(Annexure P/5). They further submit that the question of taw involved is also the soune. 2. 3ji view of -the dbove stated submissions made by leamed counsel for the part-ies this petition is allowed in tenns of Ihe order dated 7.11.2006 passed by this Courl- in 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. Stcrte 6ovt. of Chhattis9arh & others). No order cs to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge i^*A.