'.s HISH COURT OF CHHATTESSARH AT BILA^UR Writ Petition {5} No. 4277 pf2007 Petitfoners 1. Chandrn Mohan Hirowani, 5/o N. L 5ahu, Agsd abouT 46 ysars, Assistant Teacher, Primai'y 5chool Murmundu, Tehsil- bongargarh, D!'ST- Ra.jnandgao" (C.G.) 2. 5mt. Mamta Shrivastuv, W/o 5. K. Shrivastav, Aged about 52 years, AssisTait Teachsr, ffo'/t. AAiddte School. Ksndrupar-a, Dongargorh, Dist- Rajnaidqson Versus fteapondents S. Stute of Chhattisgarh, Through ii-ie Secretsry, 5choof EduaEtioii Depat'tment, Raipur (C.£.) Director, Pubiic Instructions, Rsipur, Dist - Raipur (C.e) beput/ 6ifector, Rjblic Instructions, burg Division, bist- Durg. 4. biatf-i'ct Educution Officer. bist- Rajnsmdgao". 5. Head Master, 6ovemment Primary School, MurmundQ, Cjongar-garh, Dist- RsjnsLidgsQii. 6. Head Master, Gove.rnmwit Middle Schooi Kandnspar-u, CSongcrgarh, Dist- RQ sncERdsoGR* WRFT PETn-OIN UNDER ^RTZCLE 226 OF THE CONSTm'TION OF IN&IA SingSa Bench : Hon'bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihutri. J. 5hri H. S. Ahluwatia, Advocate for the pe-titioners. 5hri P- K- Bhaduri, Panei Lowyer' for the re^jondesnts. 2. 3. ORAL ORDER (Passsci on this 4th ctay' of Juiy, 2008) 1. Learned counsel uppeuring for the petitioners subniits thut the question of iaw tnyoived irt this petition is govei'ned by the dr-cuiar dated 20.1.1987. The High Coui-t of iViadhya Prsdesh in Indrcveer KS":';s's!s~S'ff!s'^^^SIISiWS3VIS 2. Singh Tomar vs. Stote of M.P. and others { 2004(2) M.P.H.T. 3 (MOC)} has considered the issue snd disposed of the ssid matter' in fuliowing terms;- Para 2 -.-.....—— In view uf this submission udvanced by Counsel for parties, this petition is ciisposed of by giving foliuiming direcfion& The respondent No.S shati consider petitioner's representutions referred to above and dispose of the sams. at an eariy dute, preferabiy within u period of 3 months fr-om the dute of cunimunicstion of this order in accor'dance with Suw, keeping in mind the circuiurs issued by Stute Su-vt. as aiso the directions given by the Tribuna! in aii?iitur H'tOttsr^ Learned eounsel uppe^sriny for- th£purtie^; wouSd Joiritly aubrriit arid £*dE?*ii inui thia C.QSE.^ bfiing ^iiTiiIuf iFi riGtijr^, 15 ^UOrsl'v CG*y'£?°6£lfay ti-ie decision of the Mudhya Pradesh High Court in the casa of Tridraveer Singh Tomar (aupra). In view of ufore-atated reasons, tKiS petition is disposed of in the sarr\£.ter-iria. Mo oreisr uaht'u cost^- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge