..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.208 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.182 OF 2007 Ram Nagappa Parit ...Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.Vijay C. Desai, Adv. for Applicant. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP, for State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 6th March, 2007. DATED : 6th March, 2007. DATED : 6th March, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant-orig.accused No.1 and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant has been mainly convicted under Section 307 of IPC. The maximum sentenced imposed on the applicant is two years. The applicant is now seeking bail. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicant has submitted that the applicant was on bail during ..(2).. the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. This statement is not controverted by the prosecution. The learned Advocate for the applicant has further submitted that the sentence of imprisonment is only two years and the appeal is not likely to be heard within such time. Hence, he has prayed that the applicant may be released on bail. 4. Looking to all these facts and evidence on record, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail. 5. The applicant to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant shall report to Worli Police Station, Mumbai once in a fortnight, till the disposal of his Appeal. 6. Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)