Crl. Misc. No. M-6540 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-6540 of 2011 Date of Decision: November 15, 2011 Sandeep Kumar …..Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. A.S. Sullar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) On the instructions of ASI Ram Niwas it has been informed that the petitioner has already joined investigation. Since the petitioner was not arrested from the spot alongwith 1 kg of opium, his identity and possession of the contraband would be debatable and arguable points during trial. The contents of the affidavit and authenticity of the co-accused of the petitioner, namely, Dharam Pal stating Crl. Misc. No. M-6540 of 2011 [2] that he had never named the petitioner, would be required to be tested during trial. Petition is allowed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioner he will be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the conditions that the petitioner will join investigation as and when required by the investigating officer and that will not tamper with the evidence or hamper the investigation in any manner. This order will remain operative till the presentation of challan against the petitioner. In the eventuality of presentation of challan, the petitioner would be required to furnish fresh bail bonds/ surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Court concerned. November 15, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE