IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-21037 of 2009 Date of decision:20.10.2009. Anil Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Lalit Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.B.S.Teji, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Sanjay Dhiman, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The parties to the impugned prosecution i.e. petitioner and respondent No.2 have arrived at an out of court settlement, the terms and conditions whereof are documented in affidavit Annexure P-2. Petitioner and respondent No.2 are present in the Court and are identified by their respective counsel. They own up the compounding. They further state that presently there is no dispute subsisting between them. Their joint statement has also been recorded separately. In the larger interest of the society, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.377 dated 19.10.2003 under Sections 406, 498-A, 323 IPC, P.S. Kotwali Patiala (Annexure P-1) shall stand quashed on account of compounding. Disposed of accordingly. October 20, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE