IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Review Application No. 65 of 2008 (O.&M.) in C.W.P.No.8737 of 2007 Date of Decision: 25.4.2008 Krishan Kumar and another. ....... Applicants-Petitioners through Shri Narender Hooda, Advocate. Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority and others. ....... Non-Applicants-Respondents through Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIJENDER JAIN, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? .... VIJENDER JAIN, CHIEF JUSTICE The applicants-petitioners have filed this application for review/ recall of our order dated 30.5.2007 whereby C.W.P.No.8737 of 2007 filed by them was dismissed in limine. Notice of the application was directed to be issued to the non- applicants/respondents. The office report shows that non- applicants/respondent nos. 1 and 3 have been duly served, whereas notice issued to non-applicant/respondent no.2 has not been received back, served or otherwise. However, no one is present on behalf of non-applicants/ respondent nos.1 and 3. Review Application No. 65 of 2008 (O.&M.) in C.W.P.No.8737 of 2007 -2- .... Learned counsel for the applicants-petitioners contended that some similarly situated persons, who were aggrieved by identical action of the non-applicants/ respondents, had filed petitions before various foras, such as the Consumer Forum & Civil Court of competent jurisdiction and some favourable directions were given therein. In view of this, he submitted that the applicants-petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the aforesaid writ petition so that the dismissal thereof may not come in their way for getting the desired relief on the basis of the said directions. We have heard the learned counsel for the applicants- petitioners. As noticed above, the only prayer that has been made before us is that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn instead of being dismissed on merits as was done vide order dated 30.5.2007. Therefore, keeping in view the interest of justice, we recall our order dated 30.5 .2007 and permit the applicants-petitioners to withdraw C.W.P.No.8737 of 2007 and dismiss the same as withdrawn. The application stands disposed of accordingly. (Vijender Jain ) Chief Justice April 25,2008 ( Mahesh Grover ) “SCM” Judge