IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 986 of 2011 Sanctum Institute of Education & Technology ...Petitioner Versus National Council for Teachers Education and others …Respondents. Present : Mr. Anurag Bisaria, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Singh, Advocate for respondents. Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Sri Anurag Bisaria, Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. Sudhir Singh Advocate for the respondents. The petitioner institute applied for running a B.Ed Course. The recognition for such course is granted by National Council For Teachers Education (From hereinafter referred to as “NCTE”). This was rejected on the ground that the institute had many deficiencies. The petitioners thereafter moved a statutory appeal, which was also rejected. Now counsel for the petitioner contends that these deficiencies have by now removed. These facts cannot be appreciated in a writ petition. However, the petitioners are at liberty to approach the concerned authorities for grant of recognition as and when these deficiencies are being taken care of and NCTE on such a representation shall disposed it in accordance with law. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 24.5.2011 Kuldeep