IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.440 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: July 07, 2011 Gurdev Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Gurinder Singh Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) Crl. Misc. No.10092 of 2011 For reasons given in the application, delay of 4 days in filing the revision petition is condoned. Application is accordingly allowed. Crl. Revision No.440 of 2011 1. Learned counsel has not been able to draw attention of the Court towards any piece of material evidence that has not been considered. Learned counsel further has not been able to show to the Court that any piece of evidence has been perversely Crl. Revision No.440 of 2011 [2] read. 2. No ground for interference in exercise of revisional jurisdiction is made out. 3. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) July 07, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?