IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15257 of 2009 GHURAHU KAHAR @ TUFANI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 08.03.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 302 and other provisions of the Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act, Sections 3, 4, 5 of the Explosive Substances Act and Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act is that of the 40-45 unknown extremists several of them have been granted bail by this Court details whereof are mentioned in Para 4 & 5 of the present application. Contrary to the recital in the impugned order, learned Counsel for the State from Para 57 of the case diary submits that the petitioner was seen with a person having extremist antecedent. Considering the nature of his antecedent of two cases under Sections 302 and 364A, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge F.T.C. Vth Rohtas in Sessions Trial No. 408/2008 arising out of Nokha (Bahaila) P.S. Case No. 93/2007. Both the sureties must be his father and brother respectively whose photograph and proof of residence shall be appended to the bail bonds and shall be verified by the court below before acceptance of the same. In the event of his not being properly represented on any date or failure to physically appear on a date directed by the court below, it shall deal with him appropriately in accordance with law so that the progress of the trial is not hindered. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)