1 IN THE HIGH COUT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 794 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 744 OF 1991 Laxman Bala Patil since deceased through L.rs 1A. Sau. Malubai Mahadev Jadhav & ors..... Applicants Vs. Rupchand Sakharam Gandhi since deceased through L.rs 1A. Subhash Rupchand Gandhi & ors.... Respondents Mr. A.B. Tajane Adv. for the applicants Mrs. Anita Agarwal Adv. for the respondents. CORAM : R.G. KETKAR, J. DATE : 30th July, 2010. P.C. : 1. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the Second Appeal as also for bringing on record the heirs and legal representatives of applicant no.1 Laxman Bala Patil on record. 2. Heard Mr. Tajane, learned counsel for the applicants and Mrs. Anita Agarwal for the respondents. 3. For the reasons stated in the application civil application is allowed 2 in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) with no order as to costs. Amendment to be carried out in two weeks from today. ( R.G. KETKAR, J.) 3 IN THE HIGH COUT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 570 OF 2006 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 744 OF 1991 Rupchand Sakharam Gandhi since deceased through L.rs 1A. Subhash Rupchand Gandhi & ors ..... Applicants Vs. Laxman Bala Patil since deceased through L.rs 1A. Sau. Malubai Mahadev Jadhav & ors... Respondents Mrs. Anita Agarwal Adv. for the applicants Mr. A.B. Tajane Adv. for the respondents. CORAM : R.G. KETKAR, J. DATE : 30th July, 2010. P.C. : 1. This is an application for bringing on record the heirs and legal representatives of applicant no.1, since deceased on record. 2. Heard Mrs Anita Agarwal, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr Tajane for the respondent. 3. For the reasons stated in the application civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), (b) and (c) with no order as to costs. 4 Amendment to be carried out in two weeks from today. [R.G. KETKAR, J.]