IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 6553 of 2011 Date of Decision : 10.10.2011 ________________________________________________________ Surender & Others ….Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. & Others ….Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________________ For the Petitioners: Mr. Rupinder Singh, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 3. Ms. Rita Goswami, Advocate, for respondent No.4 and 5. Mr. K.D. Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.6. ____________________________________________________________ R.B. Misra, J(oral) The present writ petition is filed with the following prayers: (A) By way of writ of certiorari the illegal hike in the fees/tuition fees/admission fees/taking funds by way of slip/under other various heads may be declared null and void. (B) That a writ in the nature of Mandamus may kindly be issued directing the respondent-State to 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 initiate proceedings against the institutions more particularly the present Institution and other Institutions in the State who are not following the CBSE Norms in letter and spirit and any violation by any Management would result in immediate action and punishment and prescribed under law. (C) That the respondents may be directed to produce entire record pertaining to the case.” 2. Such similar matter was adjudicated by this Court (DB), when this Court while disposing of the Writ Petition No. 446 of 2006 ( Parents Association St. Mary, Sunder Nagar versus State of H. P.) vide its order dated 18th March, 2010 has made following directions and observations: “These writ petitions pertain to various issues concerning the conduct of affairs in the private and un-aided schools in the State. Some are affiliated to CBSE Board, some are affiliated to ICSE and some are affiliated with H.P. Board of School Education. In view of the intervening developments, this court at this juncture, need not go into various aspects pertaining to the administration of the schools. Apparently, such aspects are covered by the statutes framed by the respective bodies. In case, any of the students, teaches, parents have any grievance with regard to the violation of any of the provisions governing conduct of the schools, it is certainly open to them to approach the authorities concerned, who will get an opportunity to look into the same and take appropriate corrective measures. We also make it clear that the authorities concerned should apply their mind in the light of the decision of the Apex Court in Modern School Vs. Union of India & Ors 3 (2004)5 SCC 583 and frame proper guidelines, if not already framed, with regard to the maintenance of accounts. The needful shall be done within a period of three months from the date of production of the copy of this judgment. Writ petitions are disposed of as above.” 3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered view that the present writ petition can also be disposed of in the light of directions and observations made in CWP No. 446 of 2006 (supra). Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. (R.B. Misra) Judge October 10, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), (jai) Judge