IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 31ST AUGUST 2010 / 9TH BHADRA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 5084 of 2010() ----------------------------- CMP.6426/2010 of J.M.F.C.,TALIPARAMBA .................... (CRIME NO.577/10 OF TALIPARAMBA POLICE STATION,KANNUR DT.) PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.5: ------------------------------------------- P.LATHEEF, S/O.SOOPPY, AGED 34 YEARS, PANIKKARAKATH HOUSE, KAPPALAM, TALIPARAMBA P.O., TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.V.A.SATHEESH, SRI.V.T.MADHAVANUNNI. RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------------------------- STATE THROUGH S.H.O. TALIPARAMBA POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT, REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V.RAMKUMAR, J. ---------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.5084 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 31st day of August, 2010 ORDER The petitioner who is the fifth accused in Crime No.577/2010 of Taliparamba Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 395 I.P.C., seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 3/8/2010. The petitioner was arrested on 11/8/2010. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the injury sustained and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj