THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.22176 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner is a Member of Chandur Mandal Parishad, Nalgonda District. He challenges the notice in Form-II, which in turn, gave rise to the notice in Form-V, dated 20-09-2008, issued by the 2nd respondent. The 3rd respondent was elected as the President of the Mandal Parishad. A notice in Form-II, signed by ﬁve members, was delivered to the 2nd respondent, on 19- 09-2008. Acting on the same, the 2nd respondent issued notice in Form-V, dated 20-09-2008, proposing to convene a meeting of the Mandal Parishad, on 10-10-2008, to take up the motion of No-conﬁdence against the 3rd respondent. The points urged by the petitioner are that the notice in Form-V is not accompanied by a copy of the proposed motion of No-conﬁdence, nor a copy thereof was enclosed to the notice in Form-V. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj, and Sri B. Vijaysen Reddy, learned counsel for the 3rd respondent. Learned Government Pleader had produced the original record. Even from a perusal of notice in Form-II, that is enclosed to notice in Form-V and served upon the petitioner, it is evident that the signatories did not enclose a copy of the proposed motion of No-conﬁdence. The Rules published in G.O.Ms.No.200, dated 28-04-1998, as well as the prescribed forms mandate that a copy of the proposed motion of No-conﬁdence must be enclosed to the notice in Form-II. Admittedly, such a copy was not enclosed. The notice in Form-V also contains a stipulation to the eﬀect that a copy of the proposed motion of No-conﬁdence is enclosed. When it was not even ﬁled before the 2nd respondent, the question of enclosing the same to the notice in Form-V does not arise. The 2nd respondent has chosen to enclose a copy of notice in Form-II, to the notice in Form-V, instead of the proposed motion of No-conﬁdence. In that view of the matter, both the notices are liable to be set aside. The writ petition is accordingly allowed, and the impugned notices are set aside. This order, however, does not preclude the members of the Mandal Parishad to initiate steps once again, if they are so advised. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.14-09-2008. KO