1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 29th Day of July, 2010. Ist Bail Application No. 632 of 2010 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Ram Narayan S/o Shri Seeta Ram R/o Village Jogather P.S. C.B. Ganj Bareilly, District Uttar Pradesh ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite Party _______________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No. 2175 of 2009 Under Section : 302,394 and 411 of I.P.C. Police Station : Tanakpur District : Champawat _______________________________________________ Hon’ble Prafulla C.Pant,J. Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, Present for the State. Heard. Applicant Ram Narayan, who is in jail in connection with Case Crime No. 2175 of 2009, relating to offences punishable Under Section 302,394 and 411 of I.P.C., Police Station Tanakpur, District Champawat, has sought his release on bail. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learnred counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is not named in First Information Report. It is further submitted that it is a case of circumstantial 2 evidence. On the other hand, on behalf of the State it is pointed out that it is a double murder case, in which recovery of looted money and articles has been made from the applicant. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties, and considering the gravity of the offence, this court is not inclined to grant the bail to the applicant. Therefore, without expressing any opinion as to bail merits of this case, the bail application is rejected. (Prafulla. C.Pant., J) Dt. 29.07.2010 NP