IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2010 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 37035 of 2010(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. SUNIL.K.R,(REG.NO.111677),S/O.SUDHAKARAN AGED 28 YEARS,KARIPILAVIL HOUSE,CHITTADY.P.O, KANJIRAPPALLY. 2. TOM JOSE PLATHOTTAM,(REG.NO.90655), S/O.P.M.THOMAS,AGED 23 YEARS,PLATHOTTAM HOUSE, CHERPUNKAL,PALA. 3. TOMY THOMAS MURICKAN,(REG.NO.90657) S/O.THOMAS,AGED 24 YEARS,MURICKAL HOUSE, THALAYOLAPPARAMBU. 4. JISHO JAMES,(REG.NO.111663), S/O.K.S.JAMES,AGED 23 YEARS,NJOTTANKUNNEL HOUSE, ATHIRAMPUZHA,KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 5. RENNY THOMAS,(REG.NO.111670), S/O.K.V.THOMAS,AGED 25 YEARS,KIZHAKKEKARA KAITHOLI HOUSE,KANATTUPARA,PALA. 6. AJAY AUGUSTINE,(REG.NO.111651) S/O.AUGUSTINE XAVIER,AGED 23 YEARS,CHALLAVAYALIL HOUSE,ERATTUPETTA. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.HARIDAS RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR-686560. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,KOTTAYAM-686 560. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC, UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 37035 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 13th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed MBA Course. They had appeared for the 1st Semester Supplementary Examination and IIIrd Semester MBA examination. When the results were declared, they had failed in some papers. They applied for scrutiny and revaluation as per Exts.P2, P3 and P4 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the scrutiny and revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the scrutiny of the answer paper within two weeks and the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 6 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for scrutiny and revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp