IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 414 of 2010 Date of decision: 25.11.2010 Het Ram …Petitioner. Versus Union of India and another …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate. For the respondent No.1: Ms. Anita Dogra, Central Govt. Counsel. For the respondent No.2: Mr. Vivek Thakur, Add. A.G. Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) 1. By the impugned order rights of the parties have been finally adjudicated upon. Therefore, it cannot be said that the order in question is interlocutory order. As such, the remedy of the petitioner is to utilize the statutory remedies available to him under law and the constitutional remedy under Article 227 of the Constitution of India cannot be invoked in such a situation. 2. The petition is dismissed in limine with liberty reserved to the petitioner to take appropriate action in accordance with law. 25th November, 2010 (Deepak Gupta) ™ Judge 1 Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes.