Mr.R^--"-:-;;:^.^^ rtesef^^^j^,......- [..—•••"" ^fCTt.'^ A«w* JN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPEJR Writ Petition No.£f^_/2006 oSlii PETITIONER -^^; '¥'-••;' RESPONDENTS 1. AIka Shulda, D/oShriB.P.Shukla, Aged about 39 years,-^ Working as Assistant Professor Hindi (renioved) at Nagrik Kalyah Maharidyalaya, Wandni Nagar, Durg, R/o 16/8/A- Nandim Nagar, Durg. -Versus- State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Higher Education Departtuent, Maatralaya, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). Pt. Ravi Shaiikar University, Through its Registrar, Raipur (C.G.). Nagrik Kalyan Mahavidyalaya, Through its Chaimiaa., Naudim Nagar, Durg (C.G.). 4. Principal (Incharge), Nagrik Kalyan Mahavidyalaya, Nandini Nagar, Durg (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/22'? OF THE CONSTITUTION OP ISDIA _FQR, ISSUANCE OP A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS,__PRQHIBmON. CERTIORARI ETC.OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OE ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. <y ^:'' .-.y'v"^. SM^l XI-HC-22 an^CTW ftwFsn^?; fl)*li<;Ptl|50 gsir ''yi'><id'4,upal<(!t<i®^Ri«i'(iy< aTI^STlR^/ *ii*irii ipn?p -G W^ 200 Sre^l sii^STS^cirsR^fer 13-2-2 snn h'rasnant Jayaswai, ror ine petitioner. snn viveK snarma, tfane| bxira copy or tne petitior) counsei. . Appiication tor urgent ne^nng is &r. Aavocate, wrtn snn AII Asgar, couhsei yy mis petition, tne petiti aatea ^4/12?^UU5 (Annexure-P? Professor on T6/8/1994. Aitho] riiea DUT ms expenence cenm posts of Assistant i-'roressors v/| P/Si ana me .petitioner aiso (Annexure-t-'/B). s>ne nas not Learned Sr. Counsei appl to appearing in the inten/jew, .f (Annexure-M/B) Derore the K.UI| same nas not Deen aeciaea so Un perusai OT tne recorai 24»'l^uoosthe petitioner has KUiaanipati .raising her.grif ot tne visnwavidhyalaya Acthii constitution OT. 'jniversity aurno( i^uiaanipati wnose decision ther< <bl<)td41-) *11*fdT^"ls>cl fluit^K ^aiRtqsii^W - Lawyer, forihe State. wim annexures De suppiiea to tne siate pner^cnaiienges ner removai, ffom t). .: . - 1:''" ' :'•.. mat sne was appointed as Assistam orasr nas not Deen has been fiied. The 'v^yf^ ••• ia in'tne imerview neia on 2y/i0;'20u& D^en selected. sparing tor me petinoner suomits tnat prsor i]ne pemioner suDrninea a representation ipanipa?i raising ner gnevences &ut me nctt suDmi is noted that against the order dated any representation.Derore tne me provtsions OT secuon && ipusate 'that any dispute as to boaies shall &e referred to the bennai. ;• • . liiyam st lities ana )ion snaii (iS»^IWt PSIS3SSSS6SISBS39BSM%as»iBSa5®g^ SSSSS!S^afSSS5i3c'3^S^SS^^SS;SS#^ wisssssss'ss ^^- an^T^ fc'li* 31I^[ »*<ii*Tiftg y 'Y y ^3%B'@ll sf%%i€?')S StT^l. '('3^i "^^St Section 55 of the Vishvl quoted beiow: "53. uisputes as suthQfit{Q3 ^nd bc regaraing tne Act or of anv Statu hde^f.^&' ff5 iQwT^iTiQf sny appofnreff ss or./s ^(j^hQ^{ty Qr Q^&r J^/j'»/-0ffh§ljn^\/&f^!h/ fh^ H^^t^f snail Oe reterrea to wided that befvr Kuladhlpail hsmseif^ shsfi aiv^ fh^a nfir^sfi reasonabie opportui^ \-me K.uiaanipav wnose ciectsion t^- ' • • •• - ' .'• ' ' • '. tsf<ino &n'y s'u'ch dscfslon ths (>r anyoificernominatedsy t-ijm, b Qf o^ysQn-s et^sctsd thfffwbv a 'iity of besng h^ard." . case, fhe p| <®presentatiQn raising her gif before the Kuiadhipati aiongwil on sucn representation beingl decided on its own merits in act Censequentiy, M.W.P. sjeninea copy as pen-ui <^riita^Trf ll ^'^ 'feT^ ^RSR ^;3if:?m3ntei avidhyaiaya Adhiniyam is pertin.ent and is fo constitiriion of university ises- !f any quest'on arises natson of any provisions of this or f.^i^'-.^v^^f •es, Ordinancs or pefson has been ditty mtjtied to be, a member of any */I without expressing anyopinion on the , if n a copy or tnss oraer ana tne peirtion ana filed, the same may be considered and ince witn 12 ions, mss pet 535/2006 also •s. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [•qlii^fia^