CRM-M No. 34990 of 2011 **** Jeet Singh v. State of Haryana Present: Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Man Mohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No.530 dated 29.10.2011, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 452, 506, 308 IPC registered at Police Station Sector 7, Faridabad. On 21.11.2011 the following contention was noticed:- “Relies upon order dated 14.11.2011 passed in CRM-M No. 34208 of 2011 in the case of co-accused Suresh. Further states that as per the medicolegal evidence Section 308 IPC is not made out.” Apart from that learned counsel has argued that it is an admitted case that the dispute arose because of the allegation that the complainant was teasing the daughter of the co-accused. In fact, co-accused had also filed an application in this regard. Learned DAG, on instructions from ASI Ishwar, has stated that the application moved by the co-accused was consequent to the present FIR but has accepted the fact that even in the present FIR the reason for dispute is the allegation that the complainant was teasing the daughter of the co-accused. In this view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner appear before the investigating officer on 10.12.2011 between 1.00 a.m. and 4.00 p.m. and on any other date on which his presence is required. The CRM-M No. 34990 of 2011 -2- investigating officer, on his appearance, shall release him on bail to his satisfaction, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE November 29, 2011 sunita