IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17212 of 2008 Ghanshyam, Son of Harishankar, resident of Pandeypur, House No. 5/21,228, Ram Krishna Garden Panditpur, Varanashi(U.P.)……………………………………….……….Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Pushpa Devi, wife of Ghanshyam at present C/O, R/O Katra Bazar, Near-Khazanchi Mandir, P.S. Bhagwanpur, District- Saran……………………………………………….Opposite Parties. ----------- 6. 22.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, complainant and the State. The petitioner being the husband has challenged the order altering of charge dated 05.02.2008 as well as the entire proceeding of Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No. 77 of 2000 in which initially the charges were framed under Sections 498A, 379 and 120B of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the D. P. Act. It appears that the notices were issued to opposite party no.2 on 03.11.2009 and on appearance of opposite party no.2 vide order dated 23.02.2010, the one time settlement by way of payment of Rs. Three Lac to opposite party no.2 was agreed between the parties for being paid by the petitioner. A supplementary affidavit has been - 2 - filed by the petitioner to the effect that the agreed amount has already been given to opposite party no.2 and her son. The said contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is accepted by the learned counsel for opposite party no.2. Mr. Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for Opposite party no.2 has no objection in view of one time settlement, for quashing of the present prosecution. Considering the aforesaid stand of the parties, let entire prosecution of Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No. 77 of 2000 pending in the court of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Saran at Chapra, so far as petitioner is concerned including the order dated 05.02.2008 is hereby quashed. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)