Q^ //!// •••• W«^1..&.J REPONDENTS ^.v^^- ^i^^S^- INTHEfflGHCOURTQFCHIIAmSGARHATBILASFURft:XS) W.P.fS)No3N/2011 ^.. „: :.-•-.•:•„.:-.1 PETFHONER : - AjitKumarPandeyS/o ShyamLalPandey, aged about 31 years, C/o Durgabada, Shiv Chowk Kududand, Bilaspur (C.G) VERSUS 1/ StateofC.G ^ Throygh-Secretaiy ForestDept. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G) 2.ChiefConservatorofForest BilaSpurCircle,Bilaspur(C.G) / ^: • • ' .. • ^':' : 3. Divisional Forest OfGcer Bilaspur Division, Distt.Bilaspur(C.G) MRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^.-: ^.-f^ jo^ uoipsjip Aue 01 p3|^}ue pu si uoiiezueinBaj jo^ LUIB|O siq| jeaA jeue 'tissaiiq jeuoiiiisd 0} A| s,jeuo!}jt9d 0} GUUJSJSJ |esunoo •J9UO!}!13d SLj} Apeej|e SAeq sseAoidiiis sBem io jepjo 'eOQS-SO-SO psiep Aoi|| ui 'ssseo io jsquinu sBjei ui ^es p8J9pisuoo Buisq pu si uoitezuet SIL| 10 UOitEJSplSUOO SPJBMO} sqi 'qBnoLii USAS feis tiiuqns 0} 9L|l OS|B SB J9UQ!}!t9d 9L|) 10 SLU) 9410} jjnoo siq) 10 uoiiueue »ai^ja joj iiiiep s.jsuoiiipd 34} 'j. eiun 'SA sjetffo pue e)ie{BWB^\fG siusjdns 34} }o }U3tiiBpn[ 941 ji sqt Aq ps}e6|niuojd uoiiezueinBsli si 'eeAoidiue eBeM A|iep e si oqj /Bteis 84} ioi s^eooApv iui '-lauoi}! tt^UEhBjte i^ >lS)toJt p,S] ^ phl(. l.(bU;kljfe 'eseo SIL| jo uoiiejspisuoo |(OU Sj 94 '9JOJ3J941 pUB '}n0 SpBUi 'LUILI uuojj U9))B) Buisq }ou a ))JOM 'QOOS |6uipjoooe }84t ps}}!(iiqns 'uoiieiussejdsj ^IB}S peujeai 'pueq j9L|p 941 UQ oi joi(jnf SJB OL|M 'esoLi} 6uipn|ou! psssed ueeq |A|iep pa^eniis A|JB|!LUIS y) uoi}ezue|nB3j ||sd uo!}ezye|n63j sq; jo uoi}etusLU9|duj! ^eejsqM 'Aoi|od SL|I yiiM eouepjoooe ui |n6aj joj sseo siq 'uoiiezueinBej jo^ eseo p9i|iEiqo usaq SABL| jeuoiiiied 941 io siietsp [S-d ejnxsuuv) 600S-61.-SO psiep OLUSLU J^U 3LJ} SMOL|S L|Oj4M '(|.-d sjnxsuuv) }S!| »ai(^jsuo!)!}3d 84} jo^ issunoo.peujes-i •pgjepisuoo Guieq }ou si uoitezueinBsj 40S f (900Z) 'sjaiiio pue (s) Meo a)e)S 'Aje)aja9s y> sseo 94} uiynoo ^sye '8QOZ-SO-90 uo IUSLUUJSAOQ sieis yi Aoi|od psisixs ji9L|i 'q6noq) USAS }e4t |n 'jauoi}!i9d sqt jo soueAsyB 941 'pjesH 'Adoo soueApe uo £01 [. 'ON siuepuodssj ^LUUJSAOO 'Asqna |iqsng uqg tsd SL|} joj issunoo '8|e>j 'ct 's WS tl.OZ-90-St •p •BA^SBApiis ueljoKi BJpupieifti uqs^lcjiUOH :gs i»bi>»uajB >teii»a \ ' 1 .'• \ Ual|ktK UtbtK^ Usli ifc^l-b] lib l.kbllc (la'bbl.jb^,) tbkh Ik^llc ,.........J..................,.^..,,...,..t(»mtp It-oz/^aoL'wt^J'irn • >T)M.IWbj '&ltrt.^.®'hMhlh^ VE^ 8/.—3H-I XI-HC—-; *»S*1CTI »l^ira» ^S( •<<Nt(?PT,Wtanii, fsj^iy^ .^l,[sl.^6r6/'1 \ SII^T'^W (^3^1) sn^ivi^W 'tWTSD^rwqw wirwatef sii^i z ^ilfwfN •WTOjf-iffer^ tfSr^t ^'afRwsB^r From Annexure P-1, which i^ a Ijst of working daily wage employees, it is found that the name cjf the petitioner appears at S.No.28 and it is also stated that that he is worf<ing. Further from memo Annexure P-3, it is revealed that the Division^l Forest Officer has required the subordinate Officer to send the report|of scrutiny. The petitioner is one of the applicants claiming regularization. ]Therefore, it is found that as far as petitioner's claim for regularization is ((oncerned, it is under consideration of respondents. Memo dated 03-12-2cp9 (Annexure P-3) shows that claim of regularization is under scrutiny, TJherefore, whether the petitioner is working or not is a matter of enquiry. Under these circumstances, it '^ould be proper to direct respondent No.3 to considerthe case ofthe petiti^ner also in the light ofcireular dated 05-03-2008 and the judgment of tljie Supreme Court in the case of Secretery, State of Karnataka arifl Others vs. Uma Dew" (3) and Offiers, (2006) 4 SCC 1, after makinfe necessary verifioation and sorutiny of his servioe records. With the aforesaid direotion, th^ petition is finalty disposed off. Sd-/ Mamndra Mohan Shrivasfava Judge