THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 6531 OF 2008 Dt: 27th March 2008 Between: R. Rama Devi & another …Petitioners and The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Adilabad Region. …Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 6531 OF 2008 O R D E R: Petitioners were appointed as Conductors, on daily wages, in the Adilabad Region. Through order dated 13.12.2004, the respondent herein directed the petitioners to report to duty before the Regional Manager, Hyderabad City Region. Alleging that the petitioners failed to report to duty as directed, the respondent issued office order, dated 17.01.2006, deleting the name of the petitioners from the Selected Panel of daily wage conductors, in Adilabad District. The same is challenged in this writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. Almost identical situation arose before this court, in W.P.No.1860 of 2006. The fact that the daily wage conductors are engaged, depending on the availability of work, and the difficulties of such employees to make themselves available at Hyderabad, without any assurance as to the continuous of work, was taken note of. It was also indicated that if the transfer becomes inevitable, the option of the employees must be obtained. It is not in dispute that the order passed in that case would govern the facts for the present case also. Hence, the writ petition is allowed, and the impugned order is set aside. The names of the petitioners shall be continued in the panel of select conductors, and the entrustment of the duties to the petitioners, shall depend upon the availability of work on the concerned day. However, if the transfer becomes inevitable, the petitioners shall be given the option, to choose the places of their choice within the region. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ 27th March 2008 PAN