:: 1 :: rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 437 OF 2007 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 437 OF 2007 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 437 OF 2007 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.2883 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO.2883 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO.2883 OF 2003 ....................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda . of Coram, appearances, Court’s . Orders or directions and . Registrar’s Order Court’s or Judge’s Order ....................................................... Mr.V.K.Choudhary i/b. Mr.Dinesh W.Bhosale for the Petitioners. Mr. S. S. Patwardhan for Respondent No. 27. CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 24TH OCTOBER, 2008. DATE : 24TH OCTOBER, 2008. DATE : 24TH OCTOBER, 2008. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- . This Contempt Petition is entirely without merits. The order of which Contempt is alleged is passed against Respondent No.2 i.e. the Kolhapur District Supervision (Dekhrekh) Sahakari Society Ltd., Kolhapur. It is submitted on behalf of the Respondents that the Bank is now deducting the amount. The Bank is :: 2 :: however not a party to the order of which the contempt is alleged. I see no reasons to pass an order for Contempt of Court in the present matter. The Petitioner is always at liberty to adopt appropriate proceeding in respect of the same. As far as the refund of the amount is concerned, as per the order that is a separate matter in respect of which the Petitioner is at liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings.