Cr.MMO 115 of 2011 14.7.2011 Present: Ms. Jyotsana Rewal Dua, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. A.G. with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy A.G. for the respondent. Cr.MMO 115 of 2011 Heard. The grievance of the petitioner is not substantiated from the record that application for exemption filed has not been taken on record. I am not inclined to accept the reasons as given in this petition for not taking the application on record. All that I can say is that it taxes my credibility as to how an application which is presented in Court is not taken on record. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has made a number of submissions which I do not accept including the fact that on 18th June, 2011, non-bailable warrants were issued against the petitioner herein despite the fact that he was in the toilet in the Court premises due to some stomach problem. Again I am amazed that even the Advocate present could not submit before the learned Court for a short pass over. However, taking into consideration the facts of the case, a direction is issued to the learned trial Court that in case any application for exemption is filed by the petitoner herein the same shall be taken on record and dispose it of in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), (ms) Judge