1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 2281/2011 (Pruthviraj Parmeshwarlal Jaiswal VERSUS The Commissioner, State Excise & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mrs. P.M. Chandekar, counsel for the petitioner. Mrs. I.L. Bodade, A.G.P. for the R-1 & 2. Shri A.M. Ghare, counsel for the Caveator-R-3. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : MAY 5 , 2011 . Heard. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise erroneously rejected the application filed by the petitioner for grant of stay to the order passed by the Collector on 15.04.2011 permanently suspending the CL-III License of the petitioner without recording the reasons for the same. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order passed by the Collector on 15.04.2011 is very cryptic and does not record the reasons for permanently cancelling the license of the petitioner. In any case, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, for the alleged offence, the license of the petitioner ought not have been permanently suspended and the Collector ought to have imposed some fine on the petitioner. Since the petitioner has approached this Court against the order passed by the Commissioner on 15.04.2011 rejecting the stay application filed by the petitioner, it would 2 be just and proper and in the interest of justice to dispose of this petition with a direction to the respondent no.1-The Commissioner of State Excise to decide Appeal No.124 of 2011 filed by the petitioner as early as possible and positively before the 15th of June, 2011. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.1 to decide the appeal filed by the petitioner before the 15th of June, 2011. The petitioner and the respondent no.3 undertake to remain present before the respondent no.1 on 12.5.2011. Steno copy be supplied to the learned Assistant Government Pleader, on request. JUDGE APTE