Q93 BILAS§U LN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT gCHHATTISGARH 1 C. R. No.§' 12003 IVIL REVISION UlSi 115 OF C.P. I PICANTS LAINTIFF : / Basmt kumar, aged abou 70 o. Deendayal Tamrkar //z" SudmPmsaa, aged about 6? yeiars ' 3/0. Late Toman Lal Tamrkar Balkishan, aged about 5'4 yéar /o.Late Toman Lal Tamrk 11 Rm. Vill. Sankatti, Tah. underdehi Distt. Durg yélars ‘ /.’.. 1 ‘ _ i I “‘/ @A/ 31m /o. Late Kheduram, "roman agdaboayear LaL Tamka Gulab ‘Chmd, aged bout 49yers r v W a ioKhedum Tamra Subhashamd, aged about 46 ers S/oKheduran Tamrkar on—Applicant No.1 to 3\R/o. V111 an', Th. unde /‘ The State of Chhatti3gar ‘ hrou Te Cpllectdr Tgh h istrict Durg § 7 C C. ,, ‘ L/ : PS t S/ , / S: S ar A G _W Q, . S ms V Sm kr x g/ yjéi i N . Sank a Gerdhi / h r D T CIVIL JUDGE : DURG’ PARTLY’ ALLOWING 'AN AP PLICATIO UIO./23‘RULE l OF C.P.C>. S C‘Lg N refusing the liberty to file a Civil Suit of the plaint to the plaintiffs. could 6:jthar b6 aliowed or rojscted Shii VA. Goverdhan, counsel or the respondents No. 1 to 4. Shri GD. Vaswani, Govt. Adv cate for the State/respondent No. 5. Heard The applicantskagglovad by Judgo Class-H Durg m C1v1l Suit K Kw der dated 2.8.2002 passed by First Civil o 192-Af1999. The applicants/plaintiffs foed an apphcatxon under Order 23 Ru‘e 1(3) of C.P.C. stating that in the situation ‘ prevailing many amendments were necessitated in the plaint and prayed for seeking permission to Withdraw the Civil Suit with liberty to file a separate suit if necessary. By the impugwd order, lea: ned First Civil Judge, Class-II, Durg While 3n the same cause of action ordered return The impugned order is patently illegal since the prayer of the plaintiffs impugied order is set aside. The learned First Civii Judge, Class-II, Burg shali ’ re-consider the application filed by the plaintiifs under Order 23 Rule l (3) of C.P.C. and pass appropiiate orders in aocordance with law. In View of above, LA. No. é- disposed of. CC. as per rules. 1n this view of the matter, the ‘n tote. 149/2066 for out of tum hearing stands Sdl- Dtltp Raosaheb Deshmukh f“ Judge l~w‘ A (@W) “5 XI-HC—22 ' WW W 311%31 m Hf§H , 311wmatW {Rim 02/02.!2037 Shri Ratan Pusty; counsel for t e applicants.