..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.621 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.537 OF 2008 Vijay Shankar Kamble. ..Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .... Mr.Rahul S. Kate, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 19th June, 2008. DATED : 19th June, 2008. DATED : 19th June, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant-orig.accused and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant-orig. accused has been convicted under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The applicant is now seeking bail. 3. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant was on bail during the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. This statement has not been controverted ..(2).. by the prosecution. The learned Counsel for the applicant has further submitted that the maximum sentence imposed upon the applicant is for two years and the appeal is not likely to be heard within the said time. Moreover he has further submitted that applicant has a good case on merit. 4. Looking to the above facts and the evidence on record, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 5. The applicant - Vijay Shankar Kamble be released on bail in the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rs.Thirty Thousand Only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. 6. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)