XI—HC—78 Wm WP g : mw,m,%mgr (j Q ‘ lé) f 200$ fwmWW) ‘ ’ kg WWW wmm WW WW§WW %31%uan%m ' \\ 16.3.2005 Dr. Shailesh Abuja, couns Shri - Sandeep Dubey, . State/respondents on advance co PY- Learned counsel for thva was selected as Conatable throx an appointment letter date(1 7. him. He further submits that . the petitioner had joined his se his work smoothlv. Hewever. all of a sud( appointment ofvpetitioner was cz belong to Scheduled Tribe. whe1 reservec‘x category on the basis petitioner. The further submission c that in fact, the impugneri orde cannot be passed Without holdi affording an opportunity of heari On the other hand learn admission on the ground that appeal is available to the petil . filed an appeal before apprt Learned counsel for the 1M 31 for the petitioner. Government Advocate the for Jetitioner submits that the petitioner 1gh a regular process of selection and 6.2001 (Annexure P5) Was issued to ifter receiving the appointment letter, rvices on the said post and was doing len, Vide order. Annexure P‘B‘ the incelled on the ground that he does not eas the. appointment was ’made in the )f a caste certificate submitted by the f learned counsel for the petitioner is r amounts to dismissal and the same rig departmental enquiry and Without ng to the petitioner. ied counsel for. the State opposes the an alternative efficacious remedy of ioner and the petitioner should have aching this Court. may be disposed of with a lihe atitioner also submits that this petition Tty to the petitioner to file an appeal ,f XI—HC—78 /*‘ Wé Wm Hi 2005/ WW<W) ‘ WWW ’ WW§wW WWW ’1 %;31%11311%¥T yuaH’A before the appropriate authority ami if any grievance remains afier passing of the ‘01“(ier in the appeal, he' may be permitted to approach" this Court again. The prayer is allowed. The‘pe‘tition is finally dis posed of with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner.