HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH. BILA8PUR W.P.fSl No.5785 of 2007 PETITIONBR RESPONDENTS G.S. Jamde, s/o Lt. Shri C.R. Jamde, aged about 46 years, Range Assistant, (Deputy Rauge Porest Officer) Balod Raage, Durg Forest Division, R/o Forest Colony, Balod, Distt. Dvrg (C.G). ycrsus The State of Chliatfegarh fhrough the Secretaiy, Forest Department, D.K.S. Bhawau, Raipur, Distt. Raipur(C.G). Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Forest department, Raipur. 3. The Divisional Forest OfBcer, Diu^ Forest Division, Distt.Durg (C.G). 4. D.D. Mishra, Raage Assistaat, Todein, Dlirg Forest Division, Distt. Durg (C.G). (Writ Petltion uader Artide 226 of the Coastitution of Indial Appearaace: Shri Kashif Shakeel, counsel for the petitiouer. Shri Sumit Veruaa, panel Lawyer, for the State on advaiice copy. ORAL ORDER (03.10.2007) SUNIL KUMAR 8INHA. J. Heard on adniission. Leamed counsel for fhe petitioner submits that by impugned order dated 31.8.2007 respondent no.4 has been brought ia place of the petitioner that is on the post of Range Assistant Balod Van Maadal, Durg which tlie petitioner was holdiag aad it has been said about the petitioner that his postiag shaU be at fhe option ofrespondent no.S/D.P.O., Dui^. W-P.tSl No.5785 of 2007 He subinits that this order has been Baade for adjusting respondent no.4. Froin perusal of the contents of fhe writ petition as weU as the docuiaent aanexed to the petition, it appears that presentiy the petitioner has not been trausferred from Van Mandal Dui^ and his postmg has been kept at fhe option of D.F.0., Dui^. Only fhe post held by liim is to be held by the iticumbent and for this reason alone aud ia absence of malafides or extraaeous cousiderations, particularly when there is no chaage ofplace aad it appears to be a local arrangeruent, I aai not iacluied to m.terfere with the order passed by the concemed authority. The petition has no nierit and the saiae is dismissed at the ruotion stage itself. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge /Raof