IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WMT PETITION (227) No.tA^2^0F 2009 PETITIONER ^..^ Smt. Parag Verma W/o Harishankar Verma Sarpanch, Grampanchayat Nava para,Janpad Panchayat Simga Distt. Raipur (C.G) RESPONDENTS: VERSUS 1. State Of Chhattisgarh through nt(') ..-'^ Secretary Ministry of Panchayat and /•'''.,!^' Social welfare, Mantralay D.K.S ^T^ ^•^^A--""" Bhavan Raipur (C. G.) ...-•''"'^'"^ ' 2. Collector District Raipur, ^^^•',...-"" ' Chhattisgarh. -•':> -•* r,^»- ^^ ^ 3. Sub-Divisional Officer (Prescribed Authority),Bhatapara Raipur (C.G) v^. ^) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION ^^ '•so •X ResBOndeat BTo.4 ^—GauKaranPrasad -S7oDukalu- Ram- VisrmaT spondent No.2 .--%-.. /^; « ;! s ResoondentNo. 5 ^\,^: r- ^l»o\t Respondent Np.3 Resnondeat No. 6 Respondent No.4 Resnondent No. 7 -^B Respondent No.S J'^A61^)^' l^SN€cb'° i(^%l, ^ Rtespondent No.8 (Panch) Dhanesh Kumar S/o Makhan tal Dewangan (Panch) Rajkumar S/oMohan LalVeram (Panch) Harishankar S/o Babulal Dewangan (Parich) (Respondent no. 4 fo 7 are R/o Village Navapara, ViUage Panchayat Navapara, Janpad t^lW^ Panchayat Simga, Bisst. Raipur C.G Director,, ' :: .:f :;:;' j:, ••;•.'.• Panchayat&^SecialWelfare: • S MantralayaD.K.S.BhawanRaipurpS^;^ + XI-HG—7S sn^ w ft-ii'h •inr an^l sl?qw '75T •^l<LII<yl'i<, l?tlly<IS, f°IC1!'IHll,< . U2..(^3.}....^.S.?..... Sn^TI •q?R7 (i^ji^<^T) •gfe'a? Dr. N.K. Shukla learned Shukla for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia Dy. Shri Rakesh Thakur courl pr. counsel vi/ith Shri Shailendra qA for the respondents/State, Isel for the caveator. Petitioner has fiied an ap[ Gaukaran Prasad son of Dulait son of Makhan Lal, Rajkumaij Harishankar son of Babulal D4 He has also fiied another a? the Director (Panchayat) as res|3 Appiications are allowed) incorporated during the course j Counsel for the petiti^ impugned order dated 16.9.^ petitioner has aiready preferretJ (Panchayat) vide annexure F| submits that this petition may t| respondent No.8 to decide the| counsel as weil as couosel for this praye.r of the petitioner. is g^ ^iNld^? *fl^^l ^ 1^l<1^ <^1-<^.|< ^fsifiraan^r [slication (IA No.2) for impleading tu Ram Verma, Dhanesh Kumar son of Mohan Lai Verma and twangan as respondents 4 to 7. [ication (!A No.3) for impleading sbondent No.8. Let necessary amendment be ^f the day. jner submits that against the ^008 passed by the SDO, the an appeal before the Director T-5 which is still pending. He |e disposed of with a direction to |said appeal expeditiousiy. State fhe caveator have no objection if fanted. \ 1'i1*!. ^.":^7h'^ f^^ '"\. S £ s &-,„ SsfV^S '^_....,-A ,.-f:~ '•^:""' .4^ '"-..Ks^' I-HG—78 3TI^( ^T I^-fich ^SIT 3TT^T ^^i^i _hhV + *nW(T^qi^i 'ssi '^WM^,WV\\W , wv\wy. J..4.?^... 3!I^I IR^ (ijqf^q^) '?RiTW(te3n^I <^ !n view of above, the direction to respondent No.8 the pending appea! of the p| within a period of two month^ iaw if the same has not a!rea<|y makes any application for ar a!so be decided by the said au This Court has not the case and the authority appeai and the application accordance with iavv. ^ratd^^ ^ra^if^ fe^ <Fif<-$i'<. ^affipTan^r petition is disposed of with a (• Director (Panchayat) to decide i^titioner expeditiousiy preferably from today in accordance with been decided. If +he Qetitioner interim relief, thgt same snai thority in accordance with law. expre^sed any opinion on the merits of doncerned is free to decide the filed by the petitioner, in ly Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge _L-