1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1954 OF 2001 Sayed Mohamed Hussain Rizvi .. Petitioner Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.V.R.Tripathi for petitioner Mr.Pakale with Ms.T.H.Puranik for B.M.C. respondent No.1. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 3rd March 2009. P.C. . Mr.Pakale appearing for respondents on instructions states that the Deputy Commissioner, Zone III H/East Ward of Mumbai Municipal Corporation will pass an order after hearing the petitioner and perusing the documents produced by him in support of his claim. He states that the order would be passed as expeditiously as 2 possible and in any event within a period of four weeks from the date the petitioner remains present before him. 2. Mr.Tripathi states that the petitioner would duly comply with this direction. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner shall appear before the above authority on 24th March 2009 and he shall pass the order as directed above within four weeks from 24th March 2009. 3. All pleas on merits are kept open. The contempt petition is disposed of. Needless to state that if the petitioner desires to rely upon the orders of this Court and Civil Court, it would be open for him to do so together with all contentions and statements made therein, while the claim is considered by the Authority aforestated. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order. 3 (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)