IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2918 of 2008 Date of Decision: October 28, 2010 Bhuri Devi. …Petitioner Versus Raj Kumar and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Jitender Kundu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 3. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 17.08.2007 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Panchkula, whereby suit filed by the plaintiff – petitioner herein was dismissed being not maintainable in view of Order 23 Rule 1 (4)(b) C.P.C. for the reason earlier suit C.R. No. 2918 of 2008 No. 301 of 2006 was withdrawn by the plaintiff without obtaining any leave of the Court to file any other suit on 10.04.2007. After arguing almost for 20 minutes, learned counsel for the petitioner states that present petition be permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to move an appropriate application in earlier suit No. 301 of 2006 for recalling the order dated 10.04.2007. Present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to avail such legal remedy, which are available under the law challenging the orders passed in the previous suit. However, for consuming the time of the Court, it is directed that petitioner shall pay Rs.15,000/- as exemplary cost in favour of Punjab and Haryana Bar Association Advocates’ Welfare Fund within 10 days from today. It is made clear if cost is not paid, then liberty granted to the petitioner shall stand withdrawn and petition shall stand dismissed without any liberty. October 28, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2