IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA ------ Criminal Miscellaneous No.32628 of 2011 -------- Sunil Kumar Roy son of late Bindeshwari Ray, resident of village Bagar P.S. Sikarhata, District- Bhojpur...............................................Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar............................ Opp. Party ---------------------------------- 2 24-10-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. On behalf of petitioner it has been submitted that even if money was paid by the complainant in the bank account of the petitioner, that may only lead to a civil dispute and not a case under section 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. In view of reference to transaction through bank account, the matter is not fit for grant of anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail is, therefore, rejected. In case petitioner appears before the court below within eight weeks and satisfies the court below that he has compromised his differences with the complainant, in that event, the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.7,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Shri Sushai Namit Singh, 2 Judicial Magistrate, Ara (Bhojpur) in connection with Complaint Case No. 1680-C/2010. In case no proof of compromise is filed then petitioner’s prayer for bail shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)