IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 29TH MAY 2008 / 8TH JYAISHTA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 426 of 2008(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN RP.626/2007 Dated 05/09/2007 .................... PETITIONER --------------------------- ALDOSE MATHEW, S/O.LATE N.V.MATHEW, NELKUNNESSERY HOUSE, HOUSE NO.125/45 PACHALAM, KOCHI - 12. BY ADV. SRI.ALDOSE MATHEW (PARTY-IN-PERSON) RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. MINI ANTONY, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN), SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF KOCHI. CORPORATION OFFICE, PARK AVENUE, COCHIN. 2. CICILY MATHEW, W/O.MATHEW, C.C.NO.45/124, KORAYA ROAD, PACHALAM, KOCHI - 12. BY ADV. SRI.C.M.SURESH BABU,SC,COCHIN CORPORATI FOR R.1 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------- Cont.Case (C) NO. 426 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of May, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner's grievance is that grant of licence by the respondent for manufacture of chappels in the building adjacent to his house though owned by his mothern is irregular. It is not known on what basis manufacturing licence is granted to a person in a small residential apartment which will obviously cause nuisance to the neighbouring owners. Even though petitioner contends that grant of licence is against judgment as is a favouritism shown by the respondent to the tenant of the building. I do not think there is any need to proceed with contempt. However, Contempt case is closed leaving freedom to the petitioner to challenge the licence issued by the respondent. (C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge kk 2