IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NOs : 1117 & 1244 of 2008 And TAKEN UP WRIT PETITION No.1350 of 2008 DATE:11.02.2008 W.P.No.1117 of 2008 Between: K. Ramprakash ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District, and others. ...RESPONDENTS W.P.Nos.1244 & 1350 of 2008 Between: Dilip Kumar …. PETITIONER (in both the writ petitions.) AND 1. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District, and others. ...RESPONDENTS (in both the writ petitions.) ORAL ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao) It is represented by Sri A.G. Seetharam, learned counsel for the petitioner that the alleged detenus were shown to have been duly arrested and produced before the concerned Magistrate. Subsequently, they were enlarged on bail. But however, the learned counsel has been raising certain factual disputes and seeks relief for the same from this Court. The learned Government Pleader is not in a position to contradict anything on fact, and seeks to file an appropriate affidavit with correct facts. In view of the statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the alleged detenus have since been granted bail and were freely moving in the society, we preserve their rights to agitate about any of their grievance in an appropriate petition before an appropriate forum. With the above observations, these three Writ Petitions are dismissed. ____________________ (A. GOPAL REDDY, J.) ______________________________ (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J.) 11th February, 2008 Js.