CWP(T) No. 6807/2008 23.08.2010 Present: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. M. Bisht, Dy. A.G. for respondents No.1 to 3 Ms. Sunita Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4 There is no dispute that respondent No.4 was belonging to IRDP category. As per record respondent No.4 had also been deserted by her husband. Considering the entire circumstances in totality the said respondent was engaged as a part time water carrier. Hence it cannot be said that the appointment of respondent No.4, in any manner is illegal. Further today petitioner is 52 years of age and in any event otherwise would not be entitled for appointment to the said post. No ground for interference is made out. Petition being devoid of merit is dismissed. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. August 23, 2010 (rana)