IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.56251 of 2007 BHUSHAN PASWAN & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR --------- 5. 15.7.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No.320 of 2006 for the offences registered under section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case without any justification. The so-called deceased lady had herself left her in-laws’ place for which a complaint case was filed by petitioner no.2 vide Complaint Case No.1384 of 2004, as contained in Annexure 2. It is further submitted that the informant, the brother of the deceased, realising that even the petitioners have no role filed a compromise petition before the court of C.J.M., Muzaffarpur stating therein that the matter has been settled between the parties, vide Annexure 3 to this petition. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail, however, he is not in a position to refute the submissions made on behalf of the petitioners. Considering the submissions, as noticed above, and on perusal of the allegations made in the F.I.R. and the other materials brought on record, it is directed that petitioner no.1 Bhushan Paswan, 2 petitioner no.2 Ram Lakhan Paswan and petitioner no.3 Buchiya Devi, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S.Case No.320 of 2006 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)