m 1?& ^^-l^Srv^i^ IN THE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.I WRIT PETITION fSI N0. <^Z'r2-OF 200^ 1 PETITIONER ^^€ ^s^y> ^^<::....---" r ..-•"' ^••"Vl^- ilP .-.&•• " RESPONDENTS ^* aTge /y ^t""" _^ <8- **>t. ^ft^ IJ*'2s~s:S^< i%^s'SV 9'K9^' ^ses^^'^ i^O^ ,-ffT~t-v-;. I'* ' Topsingh Patel Son of Shri Sabitram Patel,aged about 35 years, Presently posted at Govt. Girls Primary School Basna, Block Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of School Education, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Distrirt Education Officer, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.). 3. The Block Education Officer, Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.). ^.^ ft.."' 10 " - 'PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS. DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. v\ 'SSS^sS^^ HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISeARH AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATtSH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WRTT PETmON (sV N0 507 OF 2007 Petitioner Reaiondents yersys PremlaIChauhdn State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PFTTTtON (sl N0. S10 OF 2007 -^u-: Petitioner Re^iondents Dilchdnd Chauhcn versus State of Chhatt-isyirh and others WRTT PETmON (s) N0 819 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Resoondents Surendra Kumar Bishal State of Chhatt'isgarh cnd others WRFT PETmON fal N0. 521 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Respondents Rambl Sahu Stateof Chhatfrisgarh and others WRTT PFTTTtON ts) N0 522 OF 2007 Petitioneir Resoondents versys Topsingh Patel State of Chhattisgarh and others And WRIT PFTTTION (sV N0. 823 OT 2007 Pe'titioner versus Resoondents Bhanuprata^) Sidar State of ChhaHisgarh and o'thers Pr&SBnt : Mr. P.P. Sahu, counsel for -the petitioners. Mr. Satish ©upta, E)y. ©ovt. Advocorte for 1he Stcrte/ respondents. ORDER (Passed on this 25thday of January, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/reqaondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petitions are squarety covered by the decision of this Court in the case of yashwsmi- KIMICH" Bhafwdwtijfs. Mwile^fal Corfwwfien. Dwyand anothw^. 2. Fortheaforementionedreasons,thesewritpetitionsaredi^)psed of in terms of the decision of Ihis Court in the matter of Ya^iwcait Kumar Bhaiv<Ava/(Suprc^. subject to verifiaition of the fact as to whether -the petitioners have acquired B.T.I. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circukirs dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. Noorder os to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record in connected writ petitions. __-—- Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge 1 2006CE[)MPJR-C696