THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA W.P.No.23010 of 2000 ORDER The petitioner, who was working as Lecturer in second respondent College, approached this Court and filed the present writ petition with the following prayer: “to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing respondent Nos.1 and 3 to appoint a senior most lecturer as Principal to V.T.Junior College, Rajahmundry from any Government College on deputation duly relieving the 4th respondent from the post of In-charge Principal in pursuance of the letters of the first respondent from time to time addressed to the 3rd respondent in view of the serious allegation of misappropriation of the funds of V.T.Junior College by the 4th respondent or alternatively to appoint any senior most lecturer of V.T.Junior College as Principal and to pass such other order or orders”. 2. This Court, while ordering rule nisi on 08.12.2000, directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with the rules, regulations and various orders of the Government on par with other eligible candidates. Thereafter, the 4th respondent approached this Court and filed W.V.M.P.No.2896 of 2001 and this Court passed the following order on 07.10.2001: “This application seeks vacation of the interim order dated 08.12.2000 of this Court, whereby the official respondents have been directed to consider the case of the writ petitioner also for promotion as Principal to V.T.Junior College, Rajahmundry in accordance with rules, regulations and various orders of Government along with other eligible candidates. The petitioner herein, who is the 4th respondent in the writ petition, seeks vacation of the interim order contending that as he has been promoted as Principal of the V.T.Junior College, the writ petitioner would not be entitled for consideration for appointment as Principal, and that in view of the order, dated 08.12.2000 of this Court, no salary is being paid to the 4th respondent. None of these grounds warrant vacation of the interim order. The interim order is only to consider the case of the writ petitioner for promotion in accordance with the rules and regulations and if by the date the order has been passed, the 4th respondent-petitioner has already been appointed, to that extent, the interim order granted will become infructuous. Insofar as the grievance of the 4th respondent, viz., he is not being paid the salary, no relief could be granted to the 4th respondent in this application. If the 4th respondent is aggrieved, he is at liberty to take appropriate measures in law. For the reasons above, the applications are disposed of, accordingly”. 3. In the light of the above said orders passed by this Court after hearing the parties, this Court is of the view that no further orders need be passed in this writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J Date:25.11.2010 sj