CR No. 888 of 2011 (O&M) - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 888 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.02.2011 Jaswinder Singh . . .Petitioner Versus Dr.(Mrs.) Jagdeep Kaur Khosla alias Jagdeep Grewal Khosla . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Yogesh Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J 3 This is tenant’s revision against order of the learned Rent Controller, Ludhiana dated 29.5.2006 by which an application filed by the landlord under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘CPC’) for amendment of the ejectment petition has been allowed. The landlord had pleaded that she requires the demised premises for her own use and occupation for doing business and in order to further elaborate and make the pleadings more specific and explicit, it is sought to be added that she wanted to start business of retail and wholesale in the general merchandise goods with import and export thereof. It was also mentioned that she is an income tax assessee and having Permanent Account No.ABWPK6984A and also having an import and export licence vide Importer-Exporter Code (IFC) granted by the Govt. of India, Ministry of Commerce vide certificate dated 10.06.2006 in the name of her proprietorship firm M/s Jaykay Exports. The Rent Controller allowed the application on the ground that it is to elaborate the pleadings, which is not going to cause any prejudice to the tenant. However, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the proposed amendment would change the entire nature of the case. CR No. 888 of 2011 (O&M) - 2 - After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case as they emerge from the available record, I find no error in the impugned order for allowing the amendment in the petition, which only clarifies the nature of business sought to be done by the landlady in the demised premises. In view thereof, present revision petition is found to be devoid of any merit and hence, the same is hereby dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) FEBRUARY 08, 2011 JUDGE Vivek