^,-.^ ;,it>(<"^ PBTITIONBR -\ -^•- W.P.JCINO. 6586/2007 Sainath Mmj, S/o. Late Dholka Minj, Aged about 35 years, R/°- "/iUage Ropakhar, P.S. Kamles'nwarpur Mainpat, Tahsil Sitapur, Distt. Surguja (CG) Vs. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. State ot' ChhattisRarh, Secretaiy, Home D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (CG) Through:The Department, The Inspector General ot' Police, Range- Surguja(CG) The Superintendent of Police, Ambikapur Dist. Surguja (CG) The Station Incharge Ofiicer, Police Station-Kamleshwarpur Distt. Surguja Lala @ Lalan S/o. Devendra Pandey Ashish@ Golu S/o. Manish Pandey Kailash S/o. Dhani Bargah Sokha S/o. Dhani Bargah Ranjeet @ Rajnish @ Raju Pandey S/o. Deyendra Pandey Govind S/o. Chandra Bahadur Gut'a S/o. Shiva Yadav Santosh Panika S/o. Tulsi Panika Respondent No.5 to 12 are R/o, Village- Ropakhar P.S. Kanileshwarpur Mainpat, Tahsil Sitapur, Distt. Surguja-(CG) WRJT PBT!TIONJJNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satlsb K. ^nihotri) Shri A.N.Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate General for the State. O RD E R (Passed on tbis 31't day ofOctober, 2007) It is alleged by the petitioner that First Information Report was lodged on 28.09.2007 for the murder allegedly committed by respondent Nos. 5 to 12. According to leamed counsel for the petitioner, the police is investigating the matter. However, the police has not taken any action by - Z-- 3. Suguaa. apprehending named accused in the First Information Report till date. The accused persons are openly threatening to the family members of the petitioner. Be that as it may, at the stage of investigation, it is well settied law that this Court should not interi'ere with the investigation/inquiry. However, the police is directed to look into the compiaint of the petitioner and take appropriate action in the matter, In view ot' the foregoing, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ^