IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30103 of 2009 MUNNA PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.44423 of 2009 DINBANDHU PATHAK Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 21/12/2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. In construction of a room of School, some defect was reported under the direction of D.M., vigilance who was entrusted to look into the matter reported that matter was not of such importance needing vigilance report and at present Contractor is ready to remove the defect of the said room of the School but he has not been allowed by the Officer-in-Charge. The petitioners having no concern with the defect or material used are apprehending their arrest which never can be justified. I agree with the submission. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Warsaliganj P.S. Case No. 106 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. S.Ali (Mandhata Singh, J.)