'^ "G / (^yo^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF^GHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 3&T PETITIONER - ^ W.P.NO- /2003 Jagdish Pathak S/o Late Shiv Prasad Pathak Former constable no 209, aged about 24 years r/o block-d/8 7th vahinee C.G. S.A.F. BHILAI, DISTT-DURG. VERSUS RESPONDNETS Cfl- » Commandant, /^ ? Vahini Battalions, C.G. S.A.F. BhUai, ..•<<<S°T Distt-Durg (Chhattisgarh) ^^9 ff^^^' (^^- Deputy Inspector General of Police, -<'—^-»*~ ^ 1 Q A U T3T-ii1o-; frt1-i'ho++ii ^&--' ..^^" ^!^^ l<^>^ S.A.F, Bhilai (Chhattisgarh) 3- State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Hpme Department, Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.3667 OF 2003 PETiTIONER Jagdish Pathak RESPONDENTS Versus Commandant& Others K QA/rit petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Singie Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Vivek Sharma, counsei for the petitioner. Ms Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on this 9^h day of September, 2009) 1. l-1eard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the averments made in para 9 of the return derted 13-4-2004, the petitioner does not want to contest the matter on merits, at this stage. 3. in view of foregoing, the writ petition is disposed of.__ Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agiiihotri Judge