IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21235 of 2009 SANOWAR KARIM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 07.08.2009 Heard both sides. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 353 and 307 of Indian Penal Code read with Sections 4/5 of Explosive Substance Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was not arrested at the spot. It is said that he has been named in the F.I.R. on the basis of statement of co-accused Sahjad who is the driver of the vehicle from where explosive substances were allegedly recovered. Learned counsel submits that apart from that, there is nothing on record to connect him with the offence. It is contended that police officials also doubted his complicity in the crime. Earlier, an antecedent report as well as supervision note was called for. It appears that those documents have been annexed with the case diary. Petitioner does not carry any recorded criminal history. Learned counsel, referring to the supervision note of the S.D.P.O., Sherghati submits that this police officer has also doubted the complicity of the petitioner in the crime. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Sherghati,, Gaya in connection with Barachatti P.S. case no. 33 of 2009. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )