1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. Suit NO.3134 OF 1992 The Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. Plaintiffs vs. M/s. Transcon Properties Pvt.Ltd. Defendants Mr. Viral Shukla i/b M/s. Shukla & Associates for the Plaintiffs Ms. Harshada Wable i/b M/s. Malvi Ranchoddus & Co. for defendants CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED :15th June, 2007 P.C. . The parties have reached a compromise and accordingly signed the consent terms dt. 15-6-2007 being the authorised signatory. The Respective Advocates have also signed the same. There is no dispute about the identification of the person as well as the signature. The defendants have handed over the cheques as referred in para-2 and the plaintiffs are acknowledging the same also. The consent terms is marked as ’X’ and taken on record. The Suit is disposed off in view of the consent terms. . The refund of Court fee, if any, in accordance with law. 2 [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.]