IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 9714/2008 Decided on:21.4.2011 _____________________________________________ Bhuvneshwar Dutt Sharma. …Petitioner. Versus Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rupinder Thakur, Advocate. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). It is not in dispute that present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP (T) No. 9705 of 2008, titled as Bhupinder Kumar Sharma versus Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, decided on 30.3.2011. 2. Consequently, the present petition is allowed. Annexures A-8, A-9 and A-12 are quashed and set aside. The respondent is directed to do the needful, in view of the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 principles laid down in the judgment cited hereinabove, within a period of 8 weeks, after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 21.4.2011 *awasthi*