IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2010 / 24TH ASHADHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 198 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.20090/2008 Dated 31/03/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- KARTHYAYINI JANAKI, AGED 50, W/O.KUTTY KUMARAN, NADUVELI HOUSE, PATTANAKKAD P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.J.OM PRAKASH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI, WORKING AS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI. ADV. SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN,ASST.S.G OF INDI FOR R1 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Cont. Court (C) No. 198 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 15th day of July, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner claims to be a widow of a freedom fighter. In respect of claim for pension under the Swathanthrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, the petitioner filed W.P(C) No. 20090/2008 in which Annexure A judgment has been passed by this Court . The petitioner complains of non-compliance with that judgment. According to the petitioner, in the judgment, there is a categoric finding regarding the liability of the petitioner for pension despite which the respondent has now rejected the claim of the petitioner on the very same ground which has been found as unsustainable by this Court . Even if the contention of the petitioner is correct, I find that in Annexure A judgment, the ultimate direction to the respondent is to consider the recommendation of the State Government and the non- availability of record certificate and to pass an order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the recommendation from the State Government. Admittedly, an order has been passed as directed therein. Therefore, even if the respondent has not strictly appreciated the findings in the judgment, the ultimate direction in the judgment has been complied with. That being so, the petitioner's remedy lies in challenging the order now passed. Without prejudice to that right, this contempt case is closed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.