HEGH QQUR‘E‘ 6F CHHA?T§$GARH $36? $EL§$WJR 5§§m§e E : : Hoi‘i‘bia shi'H-i miimc ea. z . .. WP. Na. 432G§ 6f ’wSE Egii‘iioner Ramesh Chandra Shriva$tava son of Shri Narmada Prasad Shrivastava, aged awut 5O yeara occupaticn —— mm, resident of THak Nagar, Biiaspur. Verwg e$ @Héém State Bank of meia through iis Chief Regionai Managen Raipur. Petmon under Articles 226/227 of the Consiitution of india for issue of a3 3 rooriatewri‘c di‘rection‘ orderorcommand. Presem‘i : 8hr} Manindra Shnvastava; Sr. Advocate wRh Shri Amrito Dee, counsel for the peti‘rioner. Shri VR. Tiwari: counser for the reepondentr éML omen (Passevj WW on §$ ‘ i-‘rprri, 2m?) I The petitioner is an employeezbr‘ficer of ihe respondent—Bank. He is before me in thie petition filed unoer Arlicles 226/227 of the Constitution of lndie, inter afia seeking the following reliefs : (ii “To issue a writ in the nature oertiorari queening the impugned order paseed by the Disciplinary Authority dated 12.67.‘i§80 and that of the Appeltate Authority dated 24101 980. (ii) The other reiiet sought tor by the petitioner is to diteot the reepottdent to reinstate the petitioner in service with etieot ’rom the date he was discharged from the eewice. i‘ (2f; None of the reliefs sought tor by the petitioner in this petition can be granted by this Court at this stage Being aggrieved by the orders passed by the Qlscipéinary Authority and that of the Appellate Authority ‘ the petitioner had carried the matter by way of Speeiai Leave Petition before the Supreme R a