IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 24TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 2ND ASWINA 1929 WP(C).No. 21364 of 2007(R) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SR.MARY JACOB, AGED 52, D/O. CHACKO, MOTHER SUPERIOR, F.C. CONVENT, KARIKKAMURI, COCHIN-11. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. M.R. RANGANATHAN, SIVAN ASSOCIATES, CHITTOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM. 2. MR. SAMUEL JOHN, C/O. HOMEO CLINIC (SUJETHA), KARIKKAMURI, KOCHI-11. 3. THE CORPORATION OF COCHIN, CORPORATION COMPLEX, COCHIN-11. 4. THE SECRETARY TO LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 5. THE CHIEF TOWN PLANNER, TRIVANDRUM. 6. THE GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KADAVANTHARA, COCHIN-28. 7. POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, GANDHI NAGAR, ERNAKULAM, REP. BY ITS CHIEF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER. 8. THE STATE OF KERALA REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. BY GOVT. PLEADER K.J.MUHAMMED ANZAR ADV. SRI.C.M.SURESH BABU,SC,COCHIN CORPORATI SRI.P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, SC,GCDA SRI.SREELAL N.WARRIER SRI.SREELAL N.WARRIER SRI.JOJI THOMAS SRI.V.JOHN MANI SMT.CISSY MATHEWS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. -------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 21364 OF 2007 --------------------- Dated this the 24th day of September, 2007 J U D G M E N T A detailed counter affidavit has been filed by the 1st respondent. It is seen that the dispute between the parties is essentially a civil dispute, which will have to be adjudicated and decided by a competent civil court. Drawing my attention to Ext.R1(a) building permit, Mr. Johnson Manayani, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that it shall be ensured that respondents 1 and 2 complies with the condition Nos.4,5 and 6 in Ext.R1(a) building permit. Under this circumstances, I dispose of this writ petition relegating the parties to have an adjudication of the civil dispute between them before a competent civil court and directing that the 3rd respondent shall ensure that respondents 1 and 2 have complied with the condition Nos. 4,5 and 6 mentioned in Ext.R1(a) before the occupancy certificate is issued to them and before the building in question is finally numbered. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE vps K.R. UDAYABHANU, JUDGE CRL.A. NOS.721/99 & 213/02 JUDGMENT 13TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 CRL.R.P.769/00 ORDER IN CRL.M.P. NO.4143/00 IN CRL.R.P.769/00 DISMISSED 13.9.07 SD/- K.R. UDAYABHANU, JUDGE /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE.