IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1908 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.3.2011 Anshu . . .Petitioner Versus Devinder Kumar . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Rohit Khullar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.J.S. Mehndiratta, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against order dated 12.2.2011 passed by the Rent Controller, Chandigarh by which he has assessed the provisional rent to be paid by the tenant. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is a correction in para No.3 of the eviction petition from which he submits that the rent was not due from January 2008 but it has already been paid upto May 2010. Learned counsel for the respondent, however, submits that it was a typographical error, which was corrected before filing of the petition. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that no fault can be found with the impugned order passed by the Rent Controller about the assessment of the provisional rent even though the petitioner had filed a criminal complaint in which he has alleged that the rent upto May 2010 has already been paid. In view therefore, present revision petition is dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MARCH 22, 2011 JUDGE Vivek