IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 746 of 2005 (S/S) Ashish Gusai S/o Satish Giri Goshwami Presently posted as Junior Assistant Clerk in the officer of Prosecution Office, Dehradun Uttaranchal … Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through the Secretary Home Government of Uttaranchal, Dehradun 2. Director of Prosecution, Uttaranchal 3. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Prosecution, Uttaranchal, Dehradun …Respondents Sri B.S. Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Paresh Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the transfer orders dated 07.06.2005 and 08.06.2005 passed by respondent nos. 2 and 3. The petitioner has stated in the writ petition that he has been transferred frequently from one place to another by the respondents without observing the norms made by the Government pertaining to transfer policy. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel and perused the record. The transfer of an employee is, of course, be implemented on the basis of the norms made by the Government pertaining to the transfer policy. The respondents shall look into the matter as to whether the transfer policy 2 made by the Government has been adequately complied with in the present case or not. Accordingly, the writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall file the representation before the respondent no. 2 within a period of 15 days who shall decide the representation of the petitioner by passing speaking and reasoned order within a period of 30 days. (B.C. Kandpal, J.) 15th June, 2005 Shiv