IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 37271 of 2010 Date of decision: 29.03.2011 Mandeep Kaur and another ........ Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Amit Verma, Advocate for Mr. N S Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent - State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of necessary direction to respondent No. 1 to 3 to provide adequate security/protection to the married life, liberty and property of the petitioners and family members of petitioner No. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the present petition be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty that, in case, the petitioner still feel threatened at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 6, they may be approached to respondent No. 2. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, in case, the petitioners still feel threaten, they are at liberty to approach the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, who shall look into the same and take necessary measures, if need be. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 29.03.2011 mohan