j £991 / Q \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH SingEe Baas?! SECOND APPEAL N0. 3% OF 2004 ,Dr. Anand Jotwani, S/O Khan fDEFENDANT " Chand Jotwani, Aged about 50 years, R/O Near Sati Mandir, Bhatapara, Tahsil Baloda Bazar, District Raipur, presently residisng at Mandi Road, Bilha, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). ‘ APPELLT . , AN Versus Ram Bandhe, Aged about 45 years, R/O Mandi Road, Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). v/ PPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL A PROCEDURE. RESPONDENT : \ é {Sita Ram Bandhe, S/O Sudha PLAINTIFF HIGH CQURT OF ¢HHATTI$$ARH AT mWPvR SECQND APPEAL: NO, 339 9F 2W4 APPELLANT Dr. Anand Jotwani DEFENDANT Versus RESPONDENT : Sita Ram Bandhe PLAINTIFF Second Appeal Under Section 100 of the Code of CM! Procedure (Singie Bench' Hon'ble Shri N Kg Agarwa!‘ J ) Present Shn A P Sharma counsel for the appeliant Shn Sharad Kashyap, counsel for the respondent ORAL JUDGME T (Passed on 10‘ day of January, 2011) Learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that in execution, the possession has already been handed over to the this appeal has become respondent/plaintiff and thus, infructuous. tn View of above the appeai is dismissed as havmg become infructuous 2. eeeee SdL N. Kn Agaiwai Judge i Kvr