IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 6251 of 2000 Between: V.V.Gopala Krishna Murthy S/o.V.T.V.Koteswara Rao R/o.Chintalapudi Village Chandarlapadu Mandal Krishna Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 A.P.Administrative Tribunal Rep by its Registrar Hyderabad. 2 Ch.V.s.R.V.Prasad S/o. Village Administrative Officer(VAO) Pendyala , Kanchikacherla Mandal Krishna Dist. 3 State of A.P. Rep by its Secretary Revenue (VO) Dept A.P.Secretariat , Hyderabad-022. 4 The Commissioner of Land Revenue Govt of A.P. Hyderabad. 5 The Dist Collector Krishna Dist at Machilipatnam 6 The Sub-Collector Vijayawada , Krishna Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to To issue a writ , order or direction, especially one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to order Dt: 14-3-2000 made in O.A.No.3001/1995 and quash the same , and further declare that the petitioner is entitled to continue as Village Administrative Officer of Chintalapadu Village and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.SURENDER RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.T.BHEEMSEN & T.V.PRANAI KUMAR The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.P. No. 6251 of 2000 ORDER: (per GHULAM MOHAMMED, J) This writ petition is filed assailing the order dated 14.3.2000 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad in O.A.No.3001 of 1995 whereunder the claim of the petitioner to continue him as Village Administrative Officer, Chintalapadu, was rejected. 2. Since the writ petitioner is continuing as Village Administrative Officer pursuant to the interim orders, dated 18.04.2000 in WPMP No. 8259 of 2000 and since the second respondent had already retired from service as Village Administrative Officer, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. 3. Hence, the writ petition is closed. No order as to costs. ______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED,J ​ _____________ SANJAY KUMAR,J 17.02.2009 Stp THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.P. No.6251 of 2000 17 -02 -2009