1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 944 OF 2009 M/s.Salasar Dewllers Pvt. Ltd. ... Appellants v/s Mumbai Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & ors. ... Respondents Mr.Hiralal Thaker i/by Mr.Bhavesh Parmar for the appellants. Smt.K.K.Soraan for the Corporation - Respondent No.1 Mr.Vishal Thaker i/by Mr,.C.N.Kumar for the Resp. No.2. Mr.M.D.Nagle for the applicant. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 17TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C.: 1. The order passed in the notice of motion refusing ad- interim relief has been challenged in this appeal from order. The communication dated 7.8.2009 from the Executive Engineer, (BP) K – Ward of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, has been challenged in the suit. By this communication the Corporation had “instructed” the 2 appellant to remove the tin sheets along the compound wall within seven days from receipt of the letter failing which action as deemed fit would be initiated against them. They were also instructed not to start the demolition work of the existing building till it was vacated after agreements were executed with individual members/occupants. 2. In my view, the Trial Court has not committed any error of law by refusing the ad-interim relief. The communication merely instructs the appellant to remove the tin sheets and it is only if they are not removed that the action, if any, would be initiated. In such a case, there is no need to grant any ad- interim relief. 3. Appeal from order stands dismissed along with Civil Application No.1176 of 2009. ..... 3