IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2007 / 21ST JYAISHTA 1929 WP(C).No. 17865 of 2007(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ ABDULLA HAJI, VAYALPEEDIKAYIL HOUSE, P.O.PULIYAVU, NADAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE THOMAS (MEVADA) RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, K.S.E.B., NADAPURAM. 2. SRI. KORAN, AROOKKUNDIL HOUSE, P.O.PULIYAVU, NADAPURAM. 3. SRI. BASHEER, S/O ABDULLA HAJI, VAYALPEEDIKAYIL, NADAPURAM. 4. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SHRI. P.P.TAJUDEEN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------- WP(C) No. 17865 of 2007 ------------------------- Dated, this the 11th day of June, 2007 J U D G M E N T The alternate route suggested by the petitioner for giving electric connection to 2nd respondent is not accepted by the ADM for the reason that written consent is not obtained from 3rd respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the proposed line is also passing through 3rd respondent’s property and the alternate route suggested by the petitioner is less inconvenient to 3rd respondent than the proposed route. In the circumstances, there will be direction to the 4th respondent to pass orders approving the alternate route suggested by the petitioner, if 3rd respondent has no objection, immediately on production of a copy of this judgment. This WP(C) is disposed of as above. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.) jg