IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16250 of 2009 1. SONU YADAV 2. CHHATHU YADAV 3. RAM BARAN YADAV 4. SURESHWAR YADAV 5. DUKHIT YADAV 6. JAIRAM YADAV 7. RAJ KUMAR YADAV ----- Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 14.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of application of petitioner nos. 3 and 5. The prayer is allowed and the application for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner nos. 3 and 5 is dismissed as infructuous. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioner nos. 1,2,4,6 and 7 have been alleged for causing assault by means of either by lathi or by Rami but injuries are found simple. Section 379 IPC is super addition only and parties have compromised after settling their differences. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from - 2 - today, the above named petitioners (except petitioner nos. 3 and 5) shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, in Sahar P.S.Case No. 70 of 2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI