IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4425 of 2011 MADHU YADAV ALIAS MADHU PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR - ---------- 2. 14.02.2011 The petitioner is in custody in relation to Atri P. S. Case No. 45/2009 instituted under section 302 of the I. P.C read with Section 27 of the Arms Act. In the F.I.R, it is alleged that various persons surrounded the house of the informant. Some entered and shot dead, the informant’s brother and some remained out side. They are mostly named. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Learned counsel submit that from the F.I.R it is clear that petitioner was not involved in the incident. From the order of the Learned Sessions Judge rejecting the bail of petitioner it is clear that in course of investigation the only material that has come against the petitioner is that the petitioner was a member of extremist organization which has committed the said offence. There is no other material. Considering the aforesaid, let above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of 2 Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in Atri P. S. Case No. 45/2009. Namita ( Navaniti Prasad Singh , J.)