s<-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPURfC.G) CIVIL REVISION N0. 2005 PETITIQNER -'" DEFENDANT SWGLE BEtlCH ^Ashutosh Dubey S/o Sri N.K.Dubey aged 40 years, resident of, Sunder Nagar, Raipur, Tah & Disst. Raipur(C.G) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ..M/ A^ 1 *' ^ //y .y/ ^\^ / <^ ^' f./ <s.<-~ y 1) Arvind Bhutada S/o Late Jai Narayan, aged 36 years.f PlaintiffNo.l) ^2) Smt. Manju Bhutsada, Aged33 yrs. W/o Arvind Bhutada, f'Plaintiff No2), Both are R/o Second Manzil, Vivek Market, C/o Amrit Lal Rathi Sadar Bazar, Raipur, Tah & Disst. Raipur, CG) 3).. Raipur Co- operative society Itd., Choubey ^'' colony, Rajendra Nagar, Mauza, Chiruldih, Tah & Dist.- Raipur (CG) ^.....^.-^._^. Civil Revision Under Section 115 ofthe Code of Civil Procedure R-?1 XI-HC-78 >d l-«IOK'>«,t9-^lwi<»,R«l'«y'< IFRCTaW^ ,£;^.aiU.^^?/^. ("/</'^' /3^/tf^ an^sT iraq? (l^fg^) 3(A<iwtoiiff amairiifidtii* ffRIKR'dBd SV^W •zs/iuuuua:- Shri S.C. Varma tsarned eo<tnsel forthe applicant. This revision iias been fited Civil Procadure against the order) Distriet Judga, Raipur in Civil A| affirffled th®order passed by the filed by respondents 1 and 2 undej undsr Secfion 115 pf the Code of Idatad 29/OS/2005 passad by the ^al No.17 of 2005 wrtiereby ha trjal Court allowing the applicafion tOrder39;RuleS 1 & 2C-.P.C./ ofthe In view of ttie jtidgment Shakti Cd-operative Hoiising Dsvetopers & Ors, repofted in JT[ disposed of as not maintainabti remedy under taw or raise questloji arises. However, ttie copfes of f\ retumed fo the learned counsell tnareot. c..<^. <f>l14fft<fti +t(*iciT'Vfslirl '<fui<^i<< ^aiKlHan^w s^cwty, T). Apex Court in the case of Shiva eiety, Nagp'ur 'v's. M/s. Swaraj 2003 (4) SQ 295, this revjsion is The applicant may avait the m appeat in case any eventuatiSy re orders and the documents be after reMEinq ih&.ohQto nnnip'i Sd/- "Ag. CEBgrjusfice