:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 227 OF 2007 1. Raghunath Keshawji Parmar 2. Kamalaben Raghunath Parmar ..Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents Mr. Rishi Bhuta for applicants. Mrs.M.H. Mhatre, APP for State. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. Date : January 23, 2007. Date : January 23, 2007. Date : January 23, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard. Undoubtedly, the other co-accused i.e. the husband, mother-in-law and father-in-law of the complainant have been released on bail by the learned Magistrate. The present applicants’ anticipatory bail application has been rejected by the learned Principal Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court, Greater Mumbai on 18/1/2007. 2. The applicants are the grand parents of accused no.1 i.e. the husband of the complainant and it is specifically stated that they reside separately. Under these circumstances, I am satisfied that their :2: custodial interrogation is not warranted. 3. Hence, this application succeeds and it is directed that in the event of the arrest of any of the applicants in connection with C.R. No.528/06 registered with D.N. Nagar Police Station, each of them shall be released on bail on furnishing a PR bond in the sum of Rs.5000/- each on the condition that as and when required by the police they shall be available for interrogation. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)