:W«?URTCrCTiHATTIS6ARH^TMl,ASPW Petitioners Versus Khoobchand Manjhi, S/o Sri Baldev 5in9h Mapjhi, Aged atout 36years,Residentof Village Muchalhal, B!ock Maihpur, Djstrict Raipur Chhdttisgarh. 2. Mahavir Chakrawa'ti, S/o Shri MancLram Chckrawarti, Aged about 24 years. Resident of Villaqe Buzadi, Bhck Mainpur, Tehsil ©oriyaBand, Oistrict Roipur Chhattisgarh 3. Bharatlol Bhaati, S/o Shri Lcl Bhaati, A9ed obout 26 yeors Resident of ©udvelly, Block Mainpur, Tehsil ©ariyo Bond, btstrict Raipur, Chhattisgarh 1. 4. 6. Union of India Throigh Secretary, Ministry of Educctton, New Dehi. State of Chhatti^arh Throigh the SecretOTy 6epart»nent of School .Educatjon, ManiTdlaya &.K.S. BhaWan, Raipur' Chhattisgarh. birector bir'ectorate of Public Instryctioris, O.K.S. Bhawon, Raipur'. Chhattisgarh Directop State Educationaf Research ond Tpaining Centre, ShQnl.iffl- Nogar, Raipur. Chhdttisgarh Cotlector, District Raipup Chhattisgorh Mission Directbr Rqjiv ©andhi Shikshd Mission State Projecf . .Office' Rdipur, Chhtrttisgm'h: 7. preSent ; Block Mainpur, t>istrict Roipur Chhattisgorh 8. Chief Executive Officer Janpod Panchtyat, Biock Mainpur, &istrict Raipur Chhattisgorh iiock Educafion District Chhirttisgorh Raipur, Wri- 10. Djstrict Project Co- Ordinator (SamanVtyA), Rajiv- Sandhi Shlksha AAission, bistrict Roiipur, Chhattisgorh 11. Btock Resources Co- Ordinator (Samanvcyok), Rajiv fiandhi Shiksha Mission, District Raipur fChhattisaartt Petition under Articles 226 of the Constjtution of India ingle Benchi Hon'&te Mr". Justfce Satish K. Aghihofri. AAr. Alok Nigam, Advocdte for the Petitioners. Mr. Bhismu Kinger, Standirg oounse! for the unfon of India. Mf. Arvind Dubey, Ponel Lawyer for- the State/respondents No. 2 to Toll. OR6ER 1. (PtBsed on 25" bay of Apcii, 2007) Learned counsel oppearing for the petitioners submits that pursuanf to the order dated 13.11.2006. passed by thjs Court in W.P.(5) No. 4923/aX!6, a pepresentation was made to the ChiefExecutive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Bloek Mainpur, &istrict Roipur for consideratjon of the soid representation. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Ponchayat, Block Mompur.Djstrict Roipur,hodwrittenditetteF'totheSecretary,©overnmentofChhattisgurh, Schoo! EducatioH bepartment, on 13.12.2006 (Annexure A-3) for* toking ft 4. decision, so that dppropriate ordet' on the repr-esentortion of the petitjoners cai be possed. This Court h«gronted one month time for consideration. Consideration of representation means consideration by a!! The concerned authorities not by the Chief Executive Officer', Mainpur, alone.According to him, the same has to be considered by the Sovernment. It is strange thcrf despite dear order of this Court, the Secretary, 6ovemmenf of Chhatti^arh, Schoo! Education Department, has not passed any order on the tetter- of the Chief Executive Officer Janpdd Panchoyat, Block Mainpur, bistrict Raipur. In view of the fact, the Secretary, &overnment of Chhottisgarh, Schoo! Educatfon &epor-tment is directed to consider the letter- dated 13.12.2006 (Annexure A-3) of the Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Btock Muinpur, bistrict Ruipur, and pass appropriate order in accordance with !aw, Immediately within Q period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Vv'ith the above obse"vation, thls petition is disposed of.Noorderasto costs. SL^hssh Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge