IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 2104 of 2009 Between: Pentyala Rama Rao, S/o. Late Subba Rao, R/o. P.V.Colony, Kunavaram Block, Manuguru Post and Mandal, Khammam District. ..... PETITIONER AND The Station House Officer, Police Station, Manuguru Post and Mandal, Khammam District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ or direction preferably writ of manamus, declaring the inaction of the respondents in not initiating action according to law upon petitioner complaints dated 27-12-2008 & 13.01.2009 and of refusal to accept petitioner complaint dated 13.1.2009 sent by Courier service and his failure to give necessary protection to petitioner for petitioner and his property possession and enjoyment of the land in Sy.No.314/1442 measuring Acs4-20 gts situated at samithisingaram Village of Manuguru Mandal, Khammam District is illegal, arbitrary, and volatile of principles of natural justice e and consequently direct the respondents to initiate action upon petitioner complaints dated 27-12-2008 and 31-1-2009 by giving necessary protection to petitioner in respect of petitioner land stated supra, and may be pleased to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.KOWTURU VINAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : O R D E R:- The petitioner claims to be the absolute owner and possessor of an extent of Ac.4.20 guntas of land in Sy. No. 314/1442 situated at Samithisingaram village of Manuguru Mandal, Khammam District having acquired the same by way of succession from his father. While so, he states that one Enilka Bhadraiah under the guise of an order dated 31.8.1987 in L.T.R. Case No.976 of 1985 issued by the Special Deputy Collector (T.W.), Paloncha in respect of Ac.3.25 guntas in Sy. No.314/76, directing ejectment of one Akarapu Dharmaiah, trespassed into his land, destroyed the pipeline, removed electric service wire to his motor and demolished the existing walls of his farm-house. Then, the petitioner made a complaint on 13.1.2009 to the respondent seeking protection to him from the culprits, but it is his grievance that the respondents have neither registered the complaint nor provided him any police protection. When the matter is taken up for admission, the learned counsel for the petitioner has produced a copy of the FIR stating that the respondent has registered a case in Cr.No.33 of 2009 on 16.2.2009 based on his complaint against his adversaries, and therefore, no orders need by passed in the writ petition. In view of the registration of the F.I.R. based on the complaint of the petitioner, no further orders need be passed in this writ petition, and the same is accordingly closed. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 2nd March, 2009 bcj