WP(C) 3489/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. S Ali, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. 2. The petitioners contend that they do not satisfy the age criteria mentio ned in the advertisement dated 17.5.2010 (Annexure-4), whereby applications are invited from candidates to undergo 6 (six) months Recorders Class Course Traini ng at the Assam Survey and Settlement Training Center, Rajahnagar/ Dakhingaon, G uwahati. 3. The main submission of Mr. Ali is that the advertisement has been issued after a long gap and therefore, the petitioners’ who have in the meantime cross ed the upper age bar of 29 years, should be considered for age relaxation, to en able them to respond to the advertisement dated 17.5.2010. 4. I find from the advertisement that it is not meant for recruitment but i s meant for selecting candidates for the training at the Survey and Settlement T raining Center. In such circumstances, I do not see any enforceable legal right in favour of the petitioners to seek age relaxation, to enable them to apply for the Recorders Class Course Training. 5. In view of above, I find no merit in this writ petition and the same is dismissed.