IN THE HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGA I H AT' BILASPUR § V W.P. (syNo. R\9o§ g /2'o11 PETITIONER ‘ i Dhanraj Sahiu, S/o Late Duluram Sahu, aged‘é about ’61 years, occupation Seiivice, posted as Head Master Primary School Domsara, Block Pandariya, District Kabirdham c.G. ' wRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226i OF THE ' _coN5TITUTION ' OF TAPEROPRIATE WRIT I ‘MANISAMuslcERTTORARI ETC. OR DIRECTIONLORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETc. z i ’ VERSUS BESPONDENTS ‘1. State of C.G. through the Secretary School Education Department , DKS ‘ Bhawan Raipur, C.G. 2. The V District Education Officer, Kawardha, District Kabirdham C.G. 3. The Joint Director Treasury and I Pension, Kabirdham, District ‘ , Kabirdharn’ C.G. r INDIA FOR ISSUE ,OF AN N THE NATURE OF,‘ @ J } \ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR i WRIT PETITION (S) No. 21185 of20 11 1 PETITIONER xDhanraj Sahiu. VERSUS g State ofC.Gi & Others. I 1 RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF 'IHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Prgsent: r Shri Rakesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 2.7m day of April, 201 1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation in the light of circular dated 05.01.2011 (Annexure P/2) issued by the Goyemment of Chhattisgarh, School Education Department. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no obj ection. No permission of this Court is required to make representation to the respondent authorities. Thus, such direction cannot be issued. However, ifthe petitioners make a representation toY the respondent authorities: the same may be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits and perspective. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is dismissed. J’ y . Sd/- \.,1 sATlSH K, ANGNIHORI i I , Judge / Amit ' . FL. a