-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2693 OF 2004 P.N.Muralidharan Pillai ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents ... Mr.Mangesh Arote for V.N.Shinganpurkar for petitioner Mr. J.C.Satpute for REspondent no.2 Ms.S.V.Gajare A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 6,2005 DATE : JULY 6,2005 DATE : JULY 6,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard both sides. 2. The learned advocate for the petitioner states that he does not wish to press the prayer for quashing of the case at this stage if the trial is expedited. The prayer is reasonable. Hence, the trial is expedited. Writ Petition is disposed of. [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]