IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH MARCH 2010 / 19TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 7737 of 2010(N) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.R. PARAMESWARAN, S/O.K.T. RAVUNNI MOOTHAN, 3/454, KANNIMOOTHAN HOUSE, MOOTHANTHARA, KODUVAYUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN SMT.P.G.BABITHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SECRETARY, PERUMATTY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PERUMATTY.P.O, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. S. SIVALINGAM, S/O. SUBBAYYAN CHETTIYAR, AGED 57 YEARS, 7/743, SREE VALSAM, MAIN ROAD, VANDITHAVALAM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.7737 of 2010 (N) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 10th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T Prayer sought in the writ petition is to direct consideration of Ext.P9 representation by the 1st respondent, where the petitioner seeks action against the 2nd respondent under Rule 16 of the Kerala Municipality Building Rules. 2. If as stated, Ext.P9 has been received and is pending, the 1st respondent shall consider Ext.P9 with notice to the 2nd respondent and pass orders thereon. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. 3. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the contentions raised and it is entirely for the 1st respondent to decide the issue. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 1st respondent for compliance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE.