: 1 : cwp-3579-11=.doc USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3579 OF 2011 Jitendra Dattaram Gadkari .. Petitioner v/s. Mrs. Vaishali Jitendra Gadkari .. Respondent ......... Mr. A.G. Damle i/b M.N. Nikose for the petitioner ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 5th MAY, 2011 P.C. : 1. The petitioner has filed proceedings under the Hindu Marriage Act being petition for divorce in the Family Court at Bombay i.e. Petition No.A-1677 of 2009. The respondent filed application at Exh.11 praying that she should be provided with monies to secure accommodation as the accommodation namely the matrimonial home at Room No.145, Shastri Nagar, Near Gurunanak Hospital, Bandra (E), Mumbai is since demolished. Learned Judge of the Family Court has by order dated 1st April, 2011 decided the said application. Learned Judge has directed petitioner to pay to the respondent a sum of Rs.5,000/- per month : 2 : cwp-3579-11=.doc towards rent for arranging for alternate accommodation. 2. I have heard learned Counsel Mr. Damale. The premises namely room No.145 mentioned above is the matrimonial home. As the same got demolished, respondent became homeless and that is how she has filed an application. A sum of Rs.5,000/- awarded by the learned Judge of the Family Court will have to be treated as a reasonable amount to secure the accommodation as the respondent and her son aged about 10 years born out of the wedlock between the petitioner and the respondent will be required to accommodate themselves in the alternate accommodation. Looking to the rents charged in Bombay and in particular the Bandra area, the respondent would be required to make arrangements for her son’s education in a school near Bandra, a sum of Rs.5,000/- is properly arrived at. No interference is required in the impugned order. Petition is required to be dismissed. Hence, following order is passed. ORDER (I) Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)