HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: B§LASPUR Writ Pe‘imon (C) ND. 2572 of 2087 Pe‘dtioner Versus 1) Regpondenis 2) 3) 4) 5) (Wrii Petmon under Articie 226 of ihe Constitution of india) $3: Han’ble Shri Jusétice satish K. Agnihotii Kartikeya JaiswaL Aged about 49 years, S/oV Late Shr§ Surendra Jaiswai, R/o. Poiice Line Road, Ambikapur, Dist. Sargu§a,CG‘ state of Chhattisgarh, Through: Coiledor, Ambikapur, Surguja, The Chief Executive Officer, Mumcipal Corporation, Ambikapur, Disrrict Surguja, CG. Assistant Engineer, Municipa! Corporation, Ambikapur, Dist. Surguja,CG. SDIO. Ambikapur, District Surguja, CG. Present Shri Mano} Paranjpe, counsei for me petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy Govt, Advocate for respondent No. ’i iState. Shri Sanjay K. Agrawai, counsei for respondents No. 2 and 3. None for other respondents. ORAL ORE£R (sawed cm 25* Aprir, 2097} Learned counsei appearing for the petiiioner submiis that the periiioner has been in possession of the disputed iand bearing Khasra Nos. 11’55 and 1751 situated at Poiice Line Road, Ambikapur, Dist. @ CG. Municipal Corporation, Ambékapur, ihrough Commissioner, Ambikapur, Dist. Surgu}a, CG. £7: a 5/5 / Surguja, CG, far the 5ast 5D years. it §s an admitted case that possession has been recorded as encroacher. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks limrted prayer to ihe extent of grant of some time so rha‘: he can approach appropriate forum for appropriate reiiet. 3. Shri Sanjay K. Agrawai, learned counsei appearing respondents No. 2 and 3 strongiy opposes the prayer in respect of iand ‘33 bearing Khasra No.1751 on the ground that the construction is progress for public purpose. of 4. Be that as it may, keeping in View the batanoe of convenience, is desirabie in the interest of justice that no steps be taken for a period of two weeks to demolish any structure, if standing on Piot No.1751 situated at Police Line Road, Ambikapur, Dist. Surguia. 5. This order for not taking steps for two weeks s’nouid not be construed that the petitioner has a, prima facie, case in his favour. The competent court lauthority, if an. appiication is made, shaii decide the same in accordance with iaw on its own merits without being intiuenced by the observation made herein above. 6. With the aforesaid obsenrations and directions, this petition is accordingly disposed of. ‘T 3 Satish K.Agnihotri f Judge ‘ Raju w “ii i