IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2282 of 2009 Anupma Kumari, wife of Sri. Subodh Kumar, resident of Village-Shivnar, P.S.-Mokama, P.O.-Shivnar, District-Patna at present Panchayat Teacher, Middle School, Shivnar, P.O.-Shivnar, District-Patna. ……….Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Panchayati Raj, Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Patna. 5. The Area Education Officer, Mokama, Patna. 6. The Block Development Officer, Mokama, Patna. 7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Mokama, Patna. 8. The Incharge, Head Mistress, Middle School, Shivnar, Mokama, Patna. 9. The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat, Shivnar, P.S.-Mokama, District-Patna. 10. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Shivnar, Mokama, Patna. 11. Sri. Sudhir Kumar, Son of Late-Chalitar Singh, the then Secretary, School Education Committee, Primary School, Shivnar Sangat Par, at and P.O.-Shivnar, District-Patna. 12. Sri. Amit Kumar, son of Sri. Ram Awadhesh Singh, resident of Village and P.O.-Shivnar, P.S.-Mokama, District-Patna, at present Panchayat Teacher, Primary School, Shivnar Sangat Par, Shivnar, Mokama, Patna. ………Respondents. ----------- 02. 18.02.2009 The primary relief which the petitioner is seeking is the direction upon the respondents to pay to the petitioner her salary for the period she has worked at Middle School, Shivnar, Mokama. She has brought evidence on record that she has made grievance in this regard earlier before the District Superintendent of Education, Patna and a direction has also been issued to the Block Education Extension Officer, Mokama vide letter No. 6538 dated 25.10.2008 which is Annexure-27 - 2 - to the writ application but despite the same, the required benefit has not accrued to the petitioner. Taking into consideration the direction issued by the Superintended of Education, Patna, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction upon him that he shall do the needful by taking up and follow up action to see that his communication and the decision dated 25.10.2008 reaches its logical end and the petitioner is given benefit of salary for the period she worked. The Court expects a final decision in this regard within a period of three months from the date of communication/production of a copy of this order. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above liberty. Shageer (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)