IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.5529-M of 2009 Date of Decision:23.11.2010 Bihari Lal and others .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. P.S. Paul, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Case file shows that no one was present on 2.7.2010 and the matter was adjourned for 24.8.2010. On the said date also no one was present on behalf of the petitioner. In any case, it was noticed that as per the report of the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) Moonak, the injured Satpal was in custody in some other case and stated that no compromise has been effected between him and the accused persons. Although, complainant Shamsher Singh and injured Ranbir Singh have stated that they have entered into a compromise with the accused. Today also no one is present on behalf of the petitioner. Dismissed for non prosecution. 23.11.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE