THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5646 of 2009 Date:23.07.2010 Between: Patnam Subbalakshmamma. ..... Petitioner AND 1. Sunkugari Srinivasa Reddy and another. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: None appeared Counsel for Respondents: Sri S. Lakshminarayana Reddy The Court made the following: ORDER: This revision petition arises out of order dated 20.11.2009 passed in E.A.No.645 of 2009 in E.A.No.1163 of 2007 in E.P.No.76 of 2007 in O.S.No.83 of 2005 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal. On 09.02.2010 there was no representation. Therefore, the case was adjourned. Even today, when the case was called there was no representation for the petitioner. At the hearing, Sri S. Lakshminarayana Reddy, learned counsel for the respondents, stated that E.A.No.645 of 2009 was filed by the petitioner for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to note the physical features of the E.P. property and that the said E.A. was filed in E.A.No.1163 of 2007 filed by the petitioner for setting aside the sale held in favour of the respondents in execution of decree in O.S.No.83 of 2005. He further submitted that during the pendency of this revision, E.A.No.1163 of 2007 itself was dismissed on 23.06.2010. As the very E.A. in which E.A.No.645 of 2009 was filed was dismissed, the cause in the present C.R.P. does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the C.R.P., C.R.P.M.P.No.1883 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 23rd July, 2010 GHN