..^-i ,.^$^ ....-'^^^-•^ ^y' A>y \>l" •rf~ •: ^ ; ^^ S '•°' ^i^s.^.^;:? uiN^Li: B£?;i,|i i* ffey^ L-- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. (Sl No. ^l e 2- / 2006 PETITIONER ^'c^ 6U -o' ^' o^ A^^o G £^Q =,v^ s^ -^N' Gopal Dewangan, S/o. Shri D.R.Dewangan, Aged about 50 years, Lecturer, Govt. Boys Hr.S.School , Kondagaoy^ Block KondagaoVi, Distt- Jagdalpur (Bastar) (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others Through- The Secretary, Department of Tribai Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Distt. -Jagdalpur ( Bastar) (C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIOM OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLF_ DIRECTION ETC TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATJER. HI6H COURT OF CHHATnS6ARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. W. P. fs) No. 7096 of 2006 Petitioner Awadhesh Kumar Pandey < •-' Respondents versus State of Chhattisgarh and others i-, WPfs.) N0. 7097 of 2006 Petitioner Smt. Radheswari Patel versus Respondents State of Chhatt-is9arh ond others W P (s.) N0. 7098 of 2006 Petitioner 5mt. Mridula Jofar versus ResBpndents State of Chhattisgarh andothers W P (s.) N0. 7099 of 2006 PeTitioner Akhi!esh Kumotf' Singh versus Respondents State of Chhatt'isgarh and others Petitioner Respondents Respondents Petitioner Resoondents Petitioner Re^iondents .°^ WPfa.TRO. 7100 of 2006 Risabh Kumar Jain versus State of Chhattisgarh and others WP(s,)NO. 7101 of 2006 Petitioner : 5mt. Anjali Mehra versus Stote of Chhattisgarh and others W_P (s.) N0. 7102 of 2006 Gopal Dewongon versus State of Chhattisgarh and others And W P (s.) N0. 7103 of 2006 Nakul Singh Netam versus State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. Anil Singh Rajput, counsel for the petitioners AAiss Sunita Jain,Panel lawyer for the State/respondents. OR & E R yassed on this 20T" day of December, 2006) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as also for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kwnar Bharadwaj vs. Munlcipal Corporertson. Dwy antf anothei^. 2. For 1he aforementioned reasons, the writ petitionsare disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of yashwant Kumar ffiarvc/waj'(Supra), subject to verificationof the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T-I. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and fur-ther whether tfiey have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be piaced on the recordof ths connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatishK-A^ Judge 1 2006CtI)MPJft-C696 Bdalu