1 77.11-appln IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION NO.77 OF 2011 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.93 OF 2011 Subratokumar Manoranjaj Nayak ..Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.Shounak Mehta for Applicant. Mrs.A.A.Mane, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : A.R.JOSHI, J. DATED : MARCH 8, 2011 P.C. :- 1. Learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant had already complied with the conditional order dated 8th February, 2011 passed in Criminal Application No.93 of 2011 and the remaining amount of Rs.25 lac has already been deposited with the Metropolitan Magistrate Court and as such there was full compliance of the order and the anticipatory bail application was already granted by the same order. Vide said order dated 8th February, 2011, two weeks’ time was given for depositing the said amount. However, on 19th February, 2011 the present criminal application No.77 of 2011 was preferred for extension of time to deposit the said amount. But on 22nd February, 2011, the amount was deposited and it was intimated to the another Bench. Consequently, on the praecipe produced on behalf of the applicant for taking up the present application for orders, another Bench has passed an endorsement mentioning rejection of the present application. 2 77.11-appln 2. Office to confirm the factual position. In the meantime, as per the statement made on behalf of the applicant, the application No.77 of 2011 is disposed of as apparently become infructuous, or otherwise withdrawn by the applicant. (A.R. JOSHI, J.)