IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44629 of 2010 LOTHA YADAV @ LOTHU YADAV, S/o Late Ramashraya Yadav. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 11.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 396, 397, 201 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code. By order dated 22.03.2010 vide Cr.Misc. No. 1540 of 2010 the petitioner was refused bail since he had remained absconding for 22 years. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail on the ground that now the trial is in progress and the three witnesses have already been examined and he will be in regular attendance during trial. Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-I, Jehanabad in connection with S.Tr. No. 223/2009/42/2009 arising out of Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 311/88 (G.R. No. 1490/88) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close 2 relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the son-in-law of the petitioner namely Naresh Prasad. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)