... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.466 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Mr V.S. Deokar for the Appellant. Mr Y.M. Nakhawa, A.G.P. for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : APRIL 28, 2006. : APRIL 28, 2006. : APRIL 28, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The Advocate appearing for the Appellant states that the Appellant is not pressing the Appeal on merits. He states that the project for which the suit land was acquired is already completed and the suit land has not been utilised for public purpose. The learned A.G.P. has no instructions in this behalf. The Advocate for the Appellants states that he desires to apply to the State Government praying for return of the land and/ or praying for withdrawal of acquisition. 2. Appeal is dismissed as no pressed. Dismissal of the Appeal will not preclude the Appellant from making the Application as stated above. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE