IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24656 of 2010 1. RAJENDRA SINGH 2. Baua Bati Devi Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 16.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. While two victim girls along with one Raja Kumar Singh were returning from phupha’s house, on the way it is said that petitioners along with Rahul Kumar, Vikash Kumar and others were sitting on Bolero. They stopped all the three and allured both the girls. However, one of the girls came back and gave her statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C., in which she states about putting pistol by both the petitioners upon victim girls which facilitated Rahul Kumar and Vikas Kumar, who got disappeared the girls. Rahul Kumar and Vikas Kumar have relation with one of the girls each separately. None of the other accused persons was joining them. One of the victim girls and Rahul Kumar are traceless till today. It is their personal love affairs may be one sided but was requiring no assistance of others otherwise there was no chance of differentiation in between statement of eye witnesses on the point of alluring the girls or taking away on the point of pistol, petitioners have 2 been made accused to make some pressure in the case. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Barauni P.S. Case No. 17 of 2010, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Begusarai subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)