IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No : 1202 of 2007 Between: Naraharisetti Seethaiah, S/o. Nageswara Rao, R/o. Western Street, Gandhi Maidan, Eluru, West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, West Godavari Edluru, West Godavari District. 3 The Joint Collector, Eluru, West Godavari District. 4 The Revenue Divisional Officer (LAO) Eluru, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: None The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No : 1202 of 2007 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… … Hon’ble Court may be pleased to declare the proceedings ROC No. F5/SW/226/G1 dated 30-12-2006 of the 2nd respondent herein pursuant to the notification ROC No. F5/SW/226/2006 dated 27-6-2006 issued by the 2nd respondent herein as illegal, arbitrary, unjust by issuing writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper.” At the hearing, none appears for the petitioner. The proceeding sheet of the case shows that at least on six previous occasions the case was adjourned either at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner or for his absence. The absence of the counsel even today shows that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing his cause in the writ petition. The writ petition is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition for non-prosectuion, WPMP.No.1532 of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed. C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 25.02.2008 ES To 1.2CCs 2.2CD copies