IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6159 of 2010 BRAHMDEO THAKUR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 26.2.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the State. First Information Report of Salkhua P.S. case No. 123 of 2004 has been instituted for the offences under sections 364 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no knowledge about his implication in case, as such he has gone to Punjab for livelihood, when he came back he was arrested on 27.10.2009. It is also stated that the victim boy in his statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C. has not made any statement against the petitioner showing his involvement in the kidnapping. Petitioner is in custody since 27.10.2009. Prayer for bail on behalf of above named petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction ofSri S.K. Dixit, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Saharsa in Salkhua P.S. case No. 123 of 2004 ( G.R. No. 946 of 2004) subject to the condition 2 that he will appear before the trial Court on each and every date fixed in the trial. In case of his absence even for a single day without seeking permission from the Court and without showing sufficient cause, his bail bond shall be cancelled. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.kumar