b vattt HIGH COURT OP CHHATnSGARH.BIlASPUR W.P.tSI Mo. 6073 of i200? PETITIONER Mifhatesh Kzimar Thatair Age aboiit 36 yeara, Asstt. Tcacher S/o Shri tifotBal Thakur Middte School Sagiiikachhar, Distfc - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus RE8POSDBNT8 1. State Govt. of Chliattisgarh Through : The Secretaiy Educatk>u Dcpartuient D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt.-Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education OfBcer, Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnaiulgaon (C.G.) WRITPBTI'nOS UNDBR ARTICUB 236 OF THE COIISTITOION OF INDIA Aonearance: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for fhe petitioner. Sbri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State on advancecopy. ORAL ORDER (09.10.2007) STOHL KUMAR SmHA, J. Heard on adinission. Leamcd counsel for the petitktner subinits ttiat the petitioner has passed B.T.I. cxaininatton on his own cxpcnses, fhcreforR, he is entitlcd to receiwc two advance increineats accom-lmg to ciTCulars datcrl 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also subinits that in mariy idcntical inatters, the petitions have bcen allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Tushtuant Kvanar Shart^we^ 7s. SSu.nicipal CotporcBHon, Burg a»ul emother {3006 (ay 9SPJR-CG 96}. He submits that his case is squarcly covered Tiy the said Judginent. Thls 1egal positioa is not disputed by the leamed counsel for thc State. However, he subinits tbat the order may be passed in tenns of fhe said jiidgment, but it. shatl be sulijccted to verification regariing petitioner's such qualification. Accordingly, fhe writ petition is aUowcd in terms of fhe order passed in case of Yashu>ant Kumar BharaduMy Vs. Mumcipcd Corporation, Durg and ajwiher (Supra) subject to the verifcation of fhc facts as to whefher the petitioner had acqiiired B.T.I. Exaniination Certificate on his own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and fiirttier whcther he taas becn psairl two advance increinents or not. The pctition stands finalty disposed of. No prrier as to costs. Sd/- SunilKumar Sinha Judge