IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 1716 of 2009 Date of decision : 26.3.2009 Ramdiya Petitioner Versus Suresh Kumar & others Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Amit Kumar Jain, Advocate for the petitioner RAJESH BINDAL, J. Challenge in the present petition is to the order passed by the learned courts below. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the dispute in the present petition was of a shop measuring 18' x 90'. In the final decree it has been permitted to be divided amongst two co- owners to the extent of 50-50 i.e. 9' x 90' . The submission is that the shop is in the grain market and the size of shop after partition will be of no use for either the petitioner or the respondent. However, I find no reason to interfere in the impugned order for the reason that the only issue raised before learned court below was that final decree had not been drawn on a stamp paper, so as to enable the petitioner to execute the same. Once the petitioner was not aggrieved against the final decree passed by learned courts below, on the ground, which is sought to be raised in C.R. No. 1716 of 2009 2 the revision, the same can not be permitted to be raised before this Court. Dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 26.03.2009 JUDGE reena