:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX TAX TAX APPEAL NO.1333 OF 2008 APPEAL NO.1333 OF 2008 APPEAL NO.1333 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. Smt.Rajnidevi A.Chowdhary ..Respondent Mr.R.Asokan for Appellant. Ms.Saloni Patil i/b. Dhru & Co.for respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & :- V.C.DAGA & :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 27TH APRIL,2009 : 27TH APRIL,2009 : 27TH APRIL,2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard learned Counsel for Revenue. 2. Having seen the order of the Tribunal and the finding recorded in paragraph Nos.6 and 7 thereof, the entire issue is decided on the basis of appreciation of evidence and on the basis of factual finding that the impugned transaction in the hands of the broker company M/s.Goldstar Finvest (P) Ltd., the transaction was accepted as genuine transaction. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law involved in the appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine. No order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)