WP(C) 6437/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Buragohain, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Goswami, learne d Standing Counsel, Education Department appearing for all the respondents. As agreed to by the learned counsel for the appearing parties, the case is taken up for disposal at the motion stage itself. The petitioner, by the present petition has challenged the order of suspension d ated 31st August, 2010 (Annexure-E) passed by the Director of Secondary Educatio n, Assam placing him under suspension with immediate effect. The petitioner though in paragraph-12 of the writ petition has contended that ag ainst the order of suspension he filed the representation before the authority, i.e. the Inspector of Schools, Sonitpur for reinstatement, no representation bef ore the Director of Secondary Education, i.e. the authority, who passed the orde r of suspension has been filed. That being the position, the present petition is disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to approach the Director of Secondary Education, Assam by way of a detailed representation ventilating his grievance and for revocation of the order of suspension. In case such representation is filed, the same shall be di sposed of by the Director of Secondary Education, Assam within a period of 15 (f ifteen) days from the date of receipt of the representation to be filed by the p etitioner. The petitioner alongwith the said representation shall file a copy o f the order passed today. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No cost.