1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE APPEAL NO.711 OF 2005 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1898 OF 2004 IN EXE. APPLICATIONS LODG.NO.513 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO.3675 OF 1992 1. Shantketan Films & ors. Appellants vs. 1. Prem Pictures Pvt.Ltd. & ors. Respondents Mr.D.D.Madon, Senior Counsel i/b. Mr.V.M.Bharadwaj for the appellants. Mr.A.Y.Bookwala i/b.M/s.Ranjit & Co. for the respondents 1 to 3. CORAM : R.M. LODHA & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 17th January 2006 P.C. Heard Mr.D.D.Madon, the learned Senior Counsel for the appellants and Mr.A.Y.Bookwala, the learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 3. 2. The impugned order is ad-interim order pending chamber summons. Moreover, we are informed by the learned Senior Counsel and the counsel appearing for the parties that broadly the parties have resolved the dispute amicably and that terms of the settlement shall be filed before the Chamber Judge. In view thereof, we 2 are satisfied that the merits of the diverse contention raised in the appeal need not be examined by us and interest of justice shall be sub-served by the following order: O R D E R (i) For a period of two weeks, the Court Receiver shall maintain status quo in respect of the subject property as obtaining today. (ii) Upon filing the consent terms by the parties, an appropriate order shall be passed by the learned Chamber Judge. (iii) If the consent terms are not filed by the parties before the learned Chamber Judge, the learned Chamber Judge shall decide the chamber summons on merits. All contentions of the parties, in that event, are kept open to be agitated before the learned Chamber Judge. (iv) We clarify that after a period of two weeks the order of status quo shall stand discharged subject to any other 3 order that may be passed by the learned Chamber Judge. (R. (R. (R. M. LODHA, J.) M. LODHA, J.) M. LODHA, J.) (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)