IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN THURSDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2009 / 21ST JYAISHTA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 3059 of 2009() ------------------------------------- CRIME NO.181/2009 OF NADAPURAM POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE .................... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED 1 TO 9: ----------------------------------------------- 1. BASHEER, 23 , S/O. SALAM VALAYAMPURATH HOUSE, IRINGALLUR, VATAKARA TALUK. 2. MUHAMMED ALI, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O. ABOOBACKER HAJI, NELLIKULATHIL (H), MUDAVANTHERI, VATAKARA TALUK. 3. MOOSA, AGED 23, S/O. MAMMI, KATTIL (H), MUDAVANTHERI, VATAKARA TALUK. 4. YOSEF, AGED 21, S/O. POKKER HAJI, CHENOLI (H), MUDAVANTHERI,VATAKARA TALUK. 5. SHUHAIB, AGED 19, POKKER MADATHIL (H), MADAVANTHERI, VATAKARA TALUK. 6. ASHIF, AGED 18, S/O. HAMSA, CHUNDAN, PUNATHIL (H), IRINGALLUR, VATAKARA TALUK. 7. RAMSHID, AGED 19, S/O. MOOSA, CHUNDAN, PUNATHIL (H), IRINGANNUR, VADAKARA TALUK. 8. SUBAIR, AGED 18, S/O. KUNHABDULLA, PANICHANTAVIDE THAZHEKUNHI (H), IRINGANNUR, VATAKARA TALUK. 9. ANSAR, AGED 21 S/O. ABOOBACKER HAJI, NELLIKULATHI (H), MUDAVANTHERI, VATAKARA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.T.H.ABDUL AZEEZ RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: ----------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. SRI. K.S. SIVKUMAR, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T. SANKARAN, J. --------------------------- B.A. No. 3059 of 2009 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 11th day of June, 2009 O R D E R This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Petitioners are accused in Crime No.181/2009 of Nadapuram Police Station, Kozhikode. 2. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 143, 147, 148, 427 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act. 3. The prosecution case is that the accused persons hurled steel bombs in the house of the defacto complainant. 4. I have gone through the case diary. The allegations leveled against the accused persons are serious in nature. 5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the offence and the weapons used, I do not think that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner. The Bail Application is accordingly dismissed. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE scm