IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 31ST AUGUST 2010 / 9TH BHADRA 1932 SA.No. 762 of 2001() -------------------- AS.14/1997 of SUB COURT, THIRUVALLA OS.414/1992 of MUNSIFF COURT, THIRUVALLA .................... APPELLANT(S): ---------------------- GOPALA PILLAI RAMAN PILLAI, AZHAKETHU VEEDU, VAPPOOKUNNISSERRY MURI, ANICKADU VILLAGE, MALLAPPALLY TALUK BY ADV. SRI.M.NARENDRA KUMAR SMT.LIJI J.VADAKKEDOM RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. LAKSHMIKUTTY AMMA BHAVANI AMMA, AZHAKATHU VEEDU, VAPPOOKUNNINISSERRY MURI, ANICKADU VILLAGE, MALLAPPALLY TALUK 2. LEKSHMIKUTTY AMMA PONNAMMA AZHAKATHU VEEDU, VAPPOOKUNNINISSERRY MURI, ANICKADU VILLAGE, MALLAPPALLY TALUK 3. BHASKARA PANICKER AZHAKATHU VEEDU, VAPPOOKUNNINISSERRY MURI, ANICKADU VILLAGE, MALLAPPALLY TALUK * 4. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, CHUDUKATTUMANNIL VEEDU, VAPPOOKUNNINISSERRY MURI, DELETED ANICKADU VILLAGE, MALLAPPALLY TALUK * 5. THANKAMMA, CHUDUKATTUMANNIL VEEDU, VAPPOOKUNNINISSERRY MURI, DELETED ANICKADU VILLAGE, MALLAPPALLY TALUK ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI SRI.V.PREMCHAND FOR R1 SRI.N.MAHESH FOR R1 SMT.ASHA JYOTHI FOR R1 SRI.CHERIYAN GHEEVARGHESE FOR R2&3 SRI.P.HARIDAS FOR DO THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: * RESPONDENTS 4 AND 5 ARE REMOVED FROM THE PARTY ARRAY BY JUDGMENT IN S.A NO.762/2001 DATED 31st AUGUST 2010. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J ----------------------------------------- S.A No.762 OF 2001 -------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of August 2010 JUDGMENT Compromise petition filed by the appellant and respondents 1 to 3 stating that they have settled the dispute among themselves in terms of the agreement reached. Appellant has also filed a separate petition for removing respondents 4 and 5 stating that they are unnecessary parties to the appeal. The compromise has been entered into by the appellant and respondents 1 to 3 only and therefore, petition filed for removal of respondents 4 and 5 has be allowed, and it is ordered accordingly. Compromise is recorded, and a decree binding in terms thereof on appellants and respondents 1 to 3 is passed accordingly. Sd/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE //True Copy// P.A TO JUDGE vdv