IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12441 of 2008 BHOLA SAHNI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 04/07/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. The informant’s son was taken away and later on he was killed. The case under section 364 of the Indian Penal Code has been registered and after recovery of the dead body section 302 Indian Penal Code was added. Submission is that the name of the petitioner does not find place in the FIR and in the protest petition. The petitioner’s name finds place in third statement of the informant before the police. The implication is on account of enmity. In course of investigation in the third statement of the informant and other witnesses have stated that they have seen the petitioner going with the victim boy and later on his dead body was found. Considering the allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge him on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. avin. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)