IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.663 of 2008 NARMADESHWAR PRASAD SRIVASTAV S/O LATE RAJESHWAR PRASAD R/O KALA NIKETAN, PATLIPUTRA TELEPHONE EXCHANGE ROAD P.O. SADAKAT ASHRAM P.S. DIGHA, KURJI, DIST. PATNA 800010. ---- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY ENERGY DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 2. SRI SWAPAN MUKHERJEE, CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, BIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD PATNA. 3. SRI ARVIND KUMAR SINGH, SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, BAILEY ROAD PATNA. 4. SRI RAJ NATH SINGH, GENERAL MANAGER CUM CHIEF ENGINEER, PATNA ELECTRIC SUPPLY UNDERTAKING, PATNA. 5. SRI SUNIL KUMAR SRIVASTAV, ELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ( MRT) PATNA ELECTRIC SUPPLY UNDERTAKING, PATNA. 6. SRI PRAMOD TIWARY, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTS (HEADQUARTERS) BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA. 7. SRI AKHILESWAR PRASAD, FINANCIAL CONTROLLER, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, BIDYUT BHAWAN PATNA-1. -- RESPONDENTS. ----------- 03 02.09.2009 Petitioner has approached this court alleging wilful violation of the order dated 27.08.2007 passed by this court on the writ petition of the petitioner (annexure-1). The writ petition was disposed of in the following manner: In that view of the matter, the petitioner is permitted to make an application/representation before the competent officer/authority of the Board for payment of statutory interest, if not already calculated and paid, within a period of two weeks from today along with a copy of the order. If such an application is filed, the concerned authority shall consider the same and dispose of by a reasoned order and, if possible, annexing the chart of 2 calculation of interest. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that certain amount has already been sanctioned but not paid to the petitioner till today. Since pleadings in this regard are not on record, I am not inclined to make any positive order in this regard. However, the petitioner may bring this fact to the notice of the authority for consideration while making the representation. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the opposite party no.2. In paragraph nos. 7 and 8 following facts have been stated: 7. That it is stated that the as claimed by the petitioner a sum of Rs.14,718/- was sanctioned and paid to the petitioner as interest on G.P.F. amount for the period 1.9.05 to 9.3.06 as earlier the statements interest on the G.P.F. amount upto 31.8.05 was sanctioned and already paid to the petitioner vide cheque no. 318187 dt 6.3.08. 8. That it stated a sum of Rs. 7061/- was also paid to the petitioner vide cheque no. 318396 dt 18.4.08 on account of revised gratuity. This court is satisfied that the order of this court has already been complied with. Nothing survives in the present application now. The application is, accordingly disposed of. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)