1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.505/2006 with CA NO.1709/2009 (Hemant Deoram Nemade Vs. Supreme Industries Limited.) AND WRIT PETITION NO. 89/2006 WITH CA NO.1707/2009. (Narendra Dodhu Bonde Vs. Supreme Industries Limited, Jalgaon.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Swapnil S Patil, Adv. for petitioner; Mr. Vijay Patil, Adv. for Respondent. ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 27 th September, 2010. ... 1) Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2) Rule was issued on 5.9.2007. However, no Interim relief was extended in favour of the petitioner. 3) In WP No.89/2006, Rule was issued on 4th September, 2007, but no interim relief was granted. 4) During the course of submissions, both the learned Counsel fairly inform, in WP No.2973/2007, decided on 24.6.2009, identical issue between the same set of petitioners and same management – Supreme Industries Limited, was involved, in which, the petitioners/employees lost and the challenge in the said writ petition was 2 also the subject of challenge in the present writ petition. 5) In that view of the matter, without further adverting to the merits in Writ Petitin Nos. 505/2006 and 89/2006, based on the order passed in WP No. 2973/2007, decided on 24.6.2009, both the present petitions are disposed of. Civil Applications in the respective petitions also disposed of. No costs. 6) Liberty to approach appropriate forum, as would be legally permissible. The authorities concerned shall independently consider the aspect of delay, if such application is moved. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/