FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2878 OF 2011 “Bharat Deelip Chavan Vs. The State of Maharashtra and othes” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. Amol N. Kakade, Advocate for petitioner Mrs. V.A. Shinde, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM :- D.B. BHOSALE & S.B. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE :- 27TH JUNE, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned AGP for respondent No.1 to 3. 2] Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of parties, heard finally at the stage of admission. 3] Though notice has not been issued to respondent Nos. 4 and 5, we are disposing of this writ petition finally, since the petitioner has not made any prayer against them. Mr. Kakade, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent Nos. 4 and 5 – Management, have already forwarded proposal for grant of approval to the petitioner's appointment, as Naik, to respondent No.3 and it is pending consideration since long. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2878 OF 2011 “Bharat Deelip Chavan Vs. The State of Maharashtra and othes” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 3] Petitioner claims that he came to be appointed as Naik on compassionate ground, in place of his father, who died in November, 2007. Petitioner has stated that he has been working as Naik with respondent Nos. 4 and 5 since the date of his appointment i.e. 4/1/2008. He further submits that respondent Nos. 4 and 5 have forwarded the proposal for grant of approval to his appointment on the post of Naik, to respondent No.3 in January 2008 and that respondent No.3 has not passed any order on the said proposal till this date. 4] In view thereof, and having considered overall facts and circumstances of the case, we are satisfied that merits of the case need not be examined and the following order shall meet the ends of justice. “Respondent No.3 shall consider and decide the proposal forwarded by respondent Nos. 4 and 5 dated 22/1/2008, (Exhibit C to the writ petition), as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of 16 weeks from the date of receipt of this order, on its own merits, in accordance with law and after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned, including respondent Nos. 4 and 5, if necessary. The petitioner to produce copy of this order before respondent No.3 within 4 weeks from today” FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2878 OF 2011 “Bharat Deelip Chavan Vs. The State of Maharashtra and othes” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 3 Rule is accordingly made absolute. No costs. While passing this order, we shall not be understood to have examined merits of the case. [S.B. DESHMUKH,J.] [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] grt/-