IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40219 of 2010 MUKESH CHAUDHARY & ORS . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02/ 10-Nov-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that only grievous injury located on the head of Pappu Kumar is attributed to another co-accused, Ganesh Chaudhary who is not a petitioner in this case. It has further been submitted that although the case is under Section 307 IPC but there was no intention to cause death and the parties are agnates having some dispute over partition of homestead land. It has further been submitted that subsequently parties have compromised their differences. Considering the aforesaid submissions, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed subject to the verification by the court below as to whether the parties have compromised their differences or not. If it is found that compromise petition has been filed in this case, in that event, all the five petitioners namely, 1. 2 MUKESH CHAUDHARY, 2. RAJESH KUMAR, 3. BINOD CHAUDHARY, 4. AMAR CHAUDHARY AND 5. FUL KUMARI DEVI shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.7000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., (West) Muzaffarpur in Kanti P.S. Case No.175 of 2010, otherwise their prayer for bail shall be considered on its own merits without being prejudiced by this order. perwez ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)