HIGH COURTOF JUDIGATURE CHHAmSGARH : BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH; HON'BLE SHFa S.R. NAYAK, CA WRIT PETITION N0. 8484 OF 2005 PETITIONER (Non-applicant No. 2) RESPONDENTS APPLICANTS Praveen Chandra PareMn, Aged about 35 yeare, S/o Prattadi Parekh, R/o Adward R<»d,Sadar Bazar, Ralpur (C.G.) Versus 1. Premin tei, WMow of Kripal Singh Singh Dhruw, Aged about 40 Years. 2. Ishwar, S/o Kripal Slngh, Aged about 17Years. 3. Pramod, S/o Krpat Singh, Aged about 16years. 4. Ku. Lata, D/o Kripal Shngh, Aged about 14 Years. 5. Ku. Aarti, Dto Kripat Singh, Aged about 12 Years. 6. Ku. Suntti, Olo Kripat Smgh, Agad aboutlOYears. 7. Ageshwar, S/o Kripal Singh, Aged about 08 Years. 8. Ku. Nishi, tyo Kr4>alSingh, Aged about 04 years. 9. Ku. Rukhmani, Uo Kripal Shigh, Aged about 02 yeare, Respondent No. 2 to9 are mlners through guardian motherPremh Bai (Respondent No. 1) AB R/o ofViNage Gogaon, Post Ofltee Birgaon, District Raipur (C.G.). 10. Kartik Ram Sahu, S/o Gariba Sahu, R/o Bada Ashok Nagar, Gudi^iri, Ralpur, P.S. Gudiyari, Dist.: Raipur (CG) Present: Mr. Shri Saurabh Jaiswal, tearned counsel ftir Vne petltfoner. —f-.' Oral Order (Passedon 16.12.2006) Learned counsel for the petttloner woutd submft that the writ petitton has become infructuoua. Accordingly, the wrtt petffion is dismi^sd as having become inlructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 'T~~l - Sd/- ChiefJustice :-/.d.'3 a-