^ (2^/2 (<y6/ INTHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.fSI N0. s32^Lf /2011fS.B.1 rfc-" PETITIONER ^^^€: ^s^' ^f ,<'.'>*-" c' RESPONDENTS Ghanshyam Baiga S/o Girdhari Baiga, aged about 39 years, Caste- Baiga, Working as Shiksha Karmi Grade-3, Priamary School, Chilhati, Block- Masturi, District- Biiaspur (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- the Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Rural Development, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Caste Scrutiny Committee, Pandit Ravishanker Vishvavidyalaya Parisar Rajpur, 2. Distt.-Raipur (C.G.). K. 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Masturi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS As mentioned in the cause title above. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As mentioned in the cause title above. -3. PARTICULARS OF THE ORDER AGAINST WHICH ^ Mr. Justice Prltinker PeEition fS} No. PEIITIOJ^ER Ghanshyam Baiga VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and others n.SBlfSe^^? RI.-S-.-' Shri Rishi Rahul Soni, counsei for the petitioner. Shri Y. S. Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the State. WRTT permoN UNDER ARTICI.E 226 OF TH! CONSTrTUTION GF ZNDZA Grievance of the petitioner is that though the Government authorities are asking hlm to get his caste certificate verified from the High Power Caste Scrutiny Committee (for short 'th'e Committee') but the said Committee is neither issuing a requisite form to him nor is responding in any manner. Counsel for the petitioner submits that on the one hand the Commlttee is not entertaining the petitloner and on the other hand a threat is being given by the department to take disciplinary action against him. 2. Learned State counsel fairly submits that the Committee would entertain the case of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. Hs submits that the Committee will also issue the requisite form in favour of the petitioner if he approaches the authority withln the time frame. 3. In view of the submission made by the counsel for the State, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the J^ --2.— petitioner to approach the Committee within 15 days from today and in turn the said Committee wlJl issue requisite form to the petitioner which would be submitted by him within further a period of one week and thereafter the Committee shall examme the matter and pass an approprlate order wlthin further period of flve months. Needless to say that due co- operation shall be offered by the parties for early disposal of case by the Committee. Tltl next six months, the department will not take any coercive step against the petitloner for not submitting the casfce certificate issued by the Committee. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge B: