c r'j^^ IN TOE HIQH COURT OF JUDICATUREOF C.G. AT BILASPUB W,P._C._ N0. /22S2 .PETITIONffi _f ,48y/ •^y /'^y ^i»' .•f' :J'' ""..^ sy BESPONDENTS r&(y.y. •c^^t ^^1 ":,"'• Kartik Ram Yadaw, S/0 Dina Nath Yadaw, aged54 years, R/0 vill- age Jhagarha, Tahsil Korba,P.S. Korba, Dis-trict Korba (Chhatti- garh). VERSUS ..U State of Qihattisgarh, Through Chief Secretary D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) (2) Collector Korba, District Korba (Chhattisgarh). ^3) Sub-Divisional Officer Korba, District Korba (Chhattisgarh). (4) Tahsi.1dar Korba, Tahsil Korba, Distric-t Korba (Chhattisgarh). (5) General Manager zeela VayiBRar and Udyeg Kendra Korba,Distt. Korba, (Chhattlsgarh). (6) M/S Himadri Chemical and Ind. ustries Ltd. 23/A Netaji Subh- ash Road 8th Floor Suit No.5 Kolkata, through Representat- ive Shri Pawan Kuaar Ctoaadhary S/0 late Vishwa Nath Chaudhary B/p Vl.yekananelBoadKolka'ta, At PrBSent Address Centre Point Korba, Dis-fcrict Korba (C.G.). WRIT PETITICN UNDER jffiTIO.E -?26/22^ OF THE a«STnU. TION OF INBIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASHJR W.P. (O No. 1279 of 2007 Petitioaer Kartik Ram Yadav Versus Respondeats State ofChlMttisgarh & others 8B; Hon'blc Mr. Justicc Satisli K. Agpi&otri, J Shri J. R. Baiaik, Advocate for fhc petitioner. Shri Utkarsh Verma, Deputy Govt. Advocate forthe respondents No. lto-1. ,J. 0_RDEK ( Pass&i on this 2nd day ofMareh, 2007) Tfac foBowing ordcr ofthc Court is passcd by 8atis& K. 1. Leamed couasel appeariag for the petitioner submits feaf though fhe CoHector Korba by order dated 21.4.2006 (Annexurc P/l) has aUotted five acres of laud from fhe Khasra No. 76/3, area 92.00, situated at village - Jhagarha, Patwari Halka ^yo. 10, District - Korba, fhe aufhorities i.e. Revenue Snspector, Tahsiidar aad Sub Divisiosal Officer (Revenue), Korba have allotted other land, bearing Khasra ?to. 14/5, which is adjace.nt to the land allotted by the ¥- 2. Be that as it may, tliis petition involves disputed question of facts. This Court ia exercise of its extraordmary JurisdK'tion cannot resolve \ fhe disputed question of fact. The petitioner is at liberty eifher to move to fhe Collector or to take recourae of fee Civfl Court for necessary orier. 3. This petition is accordingly dismissed, suauaarily, wifh the aforcsteted liberty. Consequently M(W)P No, 827/207 stands dismissed. PJo order as to oosts. Sd/- Thakur Satish KAgnihotri Judge