INTHE HIGH COURTOF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR First Aopeal (M) No. C^Ch 12,009 JTON-APPLICANT 1t " ^lrf tl»^ ••^ 9fwv' *vf.'^^ ^B<k....—"-Z RESPONDENT •PLICANT :- ^Smt, Komal Yadav w/o Keshav Prasad Yadav, aged about 22 years, ^_oup R/o Kaslurba Nagar, Sindhi ColQriy, P.S. civil Lines, BUaspur (C.G.) iy ' • • •'•'••. . . VERSUS :- ^^Ceshav Prasad Yadav S/6 Sarit Lal Yadav, aged about 26 years, R/o Dahibohra, Navatola, Post Andhiyarkhol, P.S. Pendra, District Bilaspur (C.G;.) , FIRST APPEAL UNDER_SECTION 28 OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT. K Wq^ff^^fl^i TSf •<<l<l|ivl4, »-rtly''iS, fsRTRTg^ ^Y)7.,.C& ^ SII^T 'T3RT (ijqf^siqt?) s^Vw Rs-ti* ^PSIT 3TT^?I sfpqfofT Sahu TRtIW^fCTW^I S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K, Aa^ 22.07.201 Shri JKShashtri, Advocate forf Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advo^ate disrtnissed Shrl Shashtri, learned coun^el ^ubmits that petition filed by the l-1indu Marriage Act, 1655, was dis(|niss |1ndings given by the trial court In th^ ^dverse to the appellant are not binc|ing |ie seeks permission of this court to Prayer is allowed. Consequently, the petition i^ fcrder asto costs. +l<l[<ri4)-( t<Wrtf'i|fel?l (Fai^K ^rsffinsiT^i the appellant. forrespondent. appearing for the appellant re^pondent under Section 9 of the by the trial court and the judgment and decree which are upon the appellant, therefore ^vithdraw this petition. dismissed as withdrawn. No Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge "ii^'i^ ^^•? H^TIWir, TI^^I^IM—FS/140—2/20; t-~] .50,000. /, \.