IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 19TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 28TH KARTHIKA 1929 WP(C).No. 31915 of 2007(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. NATIONAL ADIVASI FEDERATION (REG.NO.ER.354/03) VENKATT CHIRAKKAL, PALLURUTHY P.O., KOCHI - 6, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT P.K.BHASKARAN, AGED 75 YEARS, S/O.KADUTHA, PUTHENPARAMBIL HOUSE, KAIPPILLY P.O., POONJARSOUTH KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. V.N.BALAN, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.NARAYANAN, VAZHAKANDI HOUSE, THORANI MALA, SULTHAN BATHERY-VIA., WYNAD DISTRICT. 3. O.V.RAVI OLIVAYAL, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.VELIYAN, MYLAMBADI, MEENANGADI - VIA, KRISHNAGIRI VILLAGE, WYNAD DISTRICT. 4. M.K.MOHAN, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.KUNJAN, MATTIYAMBALLI, MYLAMBADI, MEENANGADI -VIA, KRISHNAGIRI VILLAGE, WYNAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.O.V.RADHAKRISHNAN (SR.) SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA SMT.A.KUMARI MINI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WYNAD, CIVIL STATION, COLLECTORATE, KALPETTA, WYNAD DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, SULTHAN BATHERY TALUK, WYNAD DISTRICT. WP(C).No. 31915 of 2007 -2- 4. M.V.SREYAMS KUMAR, MLA, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.SRI.M.P.VEERENDRAKUMAR, M.P., KRISHNAGIRI ESTATE, KALPETTA NORTH P.O., WYNAD DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. D. ANILKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C). 31915/2007 -------------------- Dated this the 19th day of November, 2007 JUDGMENT The prayer in this writ petition is to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to recover possession of certain properties which are alleged to be in possession of the fourth respondent. 2. Today, on instructions, the learned Government Pleader submits that action has already been initiated and instructions have been issued for conducting a detailed survey which is necessary for identifying the property itself. In view of the fact that the Government has already initiated action on the issue and steps are already taken, I do not see any necessity for issuing the direction sought for by the petitioner. Writ petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC Judge mrcs