IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18210 of 2010 NURAIN MIAN @ NURAIN, S/o Aziz Mian. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 23.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 20, 21 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act. By order dated 19.01.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 895 of 2010 the petitioner was allowed bail on condition that he would file an affidavit that he is not an accused in any other which he could not file since the petitioner has criminal antecedents. In view of such when he renewed his prayer for vide Cr. Misc. No. 6475 of 2010 this Court was pleased to reject the prayer for bail with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after three months. The said period has been completed now. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Gopalganj in connection with Gopalganj P.S. 2 Case No. 214 of 2009 (G.R. No. 2282 of 2009, Tr. No. 89 of 2009) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)