MC 684/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Office note dated 4.5.2011 reveals that notice for service on the respondent Nos . 1 to 3 were issued by registered post with A/D on 27.4.2011. The respondent No. 1 has entered appearance through the learned counsel. Since more than 30 days have elapsed from the date of issuance o f such notices to the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 and neither the A/D cards nor the unserved notices have returned the notice on the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are dee med to be served. Having heard the learned counsel for the appearing parties and u pon perusal of the averments made in the application seeking condonation of dela y I am of the view that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause in not p referring the appeal in time. Hence the delay of 42 days occurred in filing the appeal is cond oned. Misc. case stands allowed.