IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50128 of 2008 UMESH RAI @ GOBINDA SON OF RAM DAYAL RAI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE LERUWA,TEJPURAWA,P.S.MARHOWRAH,DISTT.SARAN AT CHAPRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 27.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered for offences under Sections 447,387 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Allegation is that the petitioner has demanded ransom of Rs.50,000/-. Submission is that no ransom money was given, so offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code is not made out. The fact is that the petitioner had given some money to the informant for purchasing bricks. The informant did not supply bricks to the petitioner and when he demanded his money, he has been implicated in this Case. Further submission is that as no injury was found, the offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code is not made out. By filing a supplementary affidavit it has been submitted that no witness has been examined as yet. The petitioner is in jail custody since 27.6.2008. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned court, Saran at Chapra in Marhowrah P.S.Case No. 126 of 2008. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)