IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16417 of 2007 Sri Durga Prasad, Son of Late Ram Narayan Prasad, Resident of Village – Rampur Pachasi, P.O. – Chandauna, Via- Jogiara, P.S. – Pupri, District – Sitamarhi, retired as Switch Board Operator Grade I, Urban Electric Supply Division, Darbhanga. ………….. Petitioner Versus 1. The Bihar State Electricity Board through its Secretary, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2. The Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna – 1. 3. Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna – 1. 4. Director of Accounts, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna – 1. 5. General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Mithila Electricity Supply Area, Darbhanga. 6. Deputy Director of Accounts, Mithila Electricity Supply Area Darbhanga. 7. Electrical Superintending Engineer, Darbhanga Vidyut Circle, Darbhanga. 8. Electrical Executive Engineer, Urban Electric Supply Division, Darbhanga. …………… Respondents ----------- 2 9/8/2011 Heard Sri Harendra Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Mukesh Kant, learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the Respondents/Bihar State Electricity Board. The present writ petition was filed with a prayer to direct the Respondents to pay retrial dues of the petitioner such as amount of group insurance, leave encashment, gratuity, G.P.F. and salary for overtime duty for the period 10.10.1997 to 01.05.2007 for 262 days with interest. In this case Sri Mukesh Kant, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondents submits that during the pendency of the writ petition almost all the grievances of the petitioner have already been 2 redressed. So far claim of over time dues of petitioner is concerned, it was submitted by learned counsel for the Board that if petitioner represents before the competent authority same will be examined and grievance of the petitioner shall be redressed. In view of the fact that most of the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed there is no need to further keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before Respondent No. 3/Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board so far his claim of over time dues amount is concerned. If such representation is filed, Respondent No. 3 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing the grievance of the petitioner as assured by learned counsel for the Respondents / Board. Court expects that Respondent No. 3 will take all steps for clearing the claim of over time dues of the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction the writ petition stands disposed of. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)