WP(C) 5495/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE. B.D. AGARWAL Heard Mr. SK Kejriwal, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Ms. R. Deka, learned Standing counsel, PWD. The petitioner’s case is that although he has executed his contract wor k satisfactorily in the year 2002 and also though part payment was made, the PWD is yet to pay ‘ 22,82,000/-. Upon hearing the learned counsel for both the sides, the respondents are directed to make an enquiry about the outstanding dues of the petitioner. The e nquiry shall be conducted by the Chief Engineer, PWD and only if some liability is admitted, the name of the writ petitioner shall be included in the chronologi cal list of contractors as per the guidelines given by this court in decision re ndered in the case of Tamser Ali -Vs- State of Assam & Ors; reported in 2008(4) GLT 1 (FB). With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.