IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.309 of 2009 (1) Bhola Prasad, son of Late Suraj Sah, (2) Anand @ Anand Kumar Gupta, (3) Gautam @ Gauram Kumar, (4) Sidhartha @ Sidhartha Kumar, all sons of Bhola Prasad, Mohalla Purani G.T. Road, Dehri, PS Dehri, Dist. Rohtas – Plaintiffs-Respondents-Petitioners. Vs. (1) Rajendra Prasad, (2) Dharmendra Prasad @ Dharmendra Kumar, both sons of Late Suraj Sah, (3) Chandan, son of Rajendra Prasad, all of Barah Pathar, Ps Dehri, Dist. Rohtas. (4) Swatantra Dev, son of Late Dharm chand Deo, Adhyachh, Sadaguru Sadaphal Deo Vihangam Jog Sansthan, Britikut Ashram, Pakari Balia, U.P. – Respondents – Opp. Parties. 7 9.2.2011 This review application has been filed which eventually could have been disposed of by just filing an application for modification of the order by making correction in paragraphs 15 and 19 of the order wherein it has been mentioned that each of the parties will be entitled to 1/4th share. After the death of father of the plaintiffs and the respondents, the parties will obviously be entitled to 1/3rd share each which has been discussed in earlier part of the order and is quite clear from the judgment itself. I make it clear that the entire basis and fundamental grounds for allocating the specific properties to the parties was based on finding of this court that Gopal Mistan Bhandar, the sweet meat shop should be divided in such a manner to that the plaintiffs and the defendants would both get a share in the property. Any adjustment made with respect to 1/3rd share will not affect the bifurcation in the sweet meat shop. 2 This review application is, thus, disposed of with the aforesaid amendment and clarification. It is made clear that the court below will obviously need to modify the allocation of share to the extent of 1/3rd in the light of the order aforesaid. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)