g g§(/\pé?;QQ/?¢QQ W Iw IN TH ON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIsGARH AT BILAsPuR (c.5. E H ) w.P. (s) No. TL €33 /zo1o PETITIONER Murlidhar Chandra, Aged abou’r 52 year‘s, S/o .Shri SuriT-Rom Chandra, Upper ivision Teacher, Districf Insfh‘ufion of Educa’rion and Training Distric‘r— Korba (C‘G.) ’ VERSUS ESPONDENTS : 1. S’rafe of Chhaffisgar‘h Through SecreTary, School Educafion Depar’rmen’r D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) Director, Public Instrucfions Raipur (6.6.) DisTricT Educafion Officer Korba (6.6.) Block Educa’rion Officer H,,‘;,;Kci|r‘ba, DisfricT- Korba (C.G.) The Principal, Disirict Institution . ‘ of Educafion & Training ( DIETj Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA g D R « \\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.7639 OF 2010 Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) , Singie Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri AnUp Mazumdar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 3rd day of January, 201 1) The petitioner was initialiy appointed on a fixed pay of Rs.150/—. After completion of the probation period, the petitioner was granted regular pay scale. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether, the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of MP. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers were entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to'the Supreme/Couitain;Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Supreme Court I‘ upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/ Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from date of initial appointment. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also submits that this court, while considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram & others v. "‘\.\_\State of Chhattisgarh & others [\N.P. (S) No.4725/2006] by &der \n .\\ PETITIONER Murlidhar Chandra RESPONDENTS dated 01.09.2006. aHowed the petitioner to make a representation within a period of ten days, raising aii their grievances. ‘ 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted Iiberty to make a representation raising all the grievances and in turn, the concerned respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordance with Iaw and the aforestated decisions, on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, subject to verification of the facts. 6. in view of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. /w’ v \ Ag“.\“o‘ri i Saf‘s" Judger i . i \ ‘\ a