-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.985 of 2010 Ramji Lal son of Shri Kalu Ram Saini VERSUS The Additional District Judge, Neem-ka-thana, Sikar & Anr. Date of Order :::: March 12th 2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Mr. S.K. Gupta, Counsel for the Petitioner *** By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned order by which the learned Appellate Court while passing an order of stay against the execution of the decree has directed the tenant-appellant, petitioner herein to deposit and pay an amount of Rs.4000/- per month as charges for the use and occupation during the pendency of the appeal. In the facts and circumstances of the case, looking to the fact that the premises in dispute, which is commercial in nature was let-out to the petitioner in the year 1997 for an amount of Rs.450/- per month and the decree for personal- bonafide-necessity for the son of the landlord has been passed by the learned trial Court against which the appeal has been -2- preferred by the petitioner and the fact that the learned Appellate Court has taken into account the rate of rent for the premises in and around the disputed premises while passing the order. There is no infirmity in the same. I find no jurisdictional error having been committed by the learned Appellate Court while passing the impugned order. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. (Dalip Singh), J. Ashok/