1 suit2560-06.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.2560 OF 2006 L & T Niro Ltd. & Anr. .. Plaintiffs Versus Deugro Projects Australia & Ors. .. Defendants Mrs.A.B.Barve for plaintiffs Ms.Shivani Shah i/b. Bhatt & Saldanha for defendant Nos. 4 and 5 Mr.M.R.Khatri for defendant No.3 Ms.Binita Hathi i/b. Lex Nexus for defendant No.1. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 8th December 2011. P.C.: 1] Plaintiffs' Advocate states that in terms of the statements and consent recorded and reduced into writing in the consent terms dated 8th December 2011, the arrangement between parties is confirmed. The amount is received in full and final settlement of plaintiffs' claim. In the light of the claim being settled in the manner set out in the consent terms and even the consent terms having been signed by the plaintiffs' constituted attorney and Authorised signatory of the defendant, the suit is allowed to be withdrawn by taking the consent terms on record and marking them as “X” for identification. Refund of court fee as per rules. No costs. 2 suit2560-06.sxw 2] In view of disposal of this suit the Notice of motion No.3063 of 2008 does not survive so also chamber summons No.1475 of 2008. Both are disposed of accordingly. Interlocutory order, if any, to stand vacated forthwith. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J)