Crl.M.No.M-36324 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-36324 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 10, 2010 Daljit Singh Chahal .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.R.S.Bassi, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.64565 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-36324 of 2010 The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.393, dated 24.10.2010, under Section 307 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Patiala. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully, including the impugned order passed by learned Sessions Judge, Patiala, vide which application filed on behalf of the present petitioner for anticipatory bail was dismissed. Brief allegations against the petitioner-accused are that during a party, he fired three shots from his licensed revolver and one of the shots hit Jaspreet Singh. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner- accused that injury has been caused accidentally as petitioner had fired three shots in air and there was no intention and that more over the dispute has also been compromised . However, petition bearing Crl.M.No.M-35149 of 2010, filed before this Court, for quashing of this very FIR has already been dismissed Crl.M.No.M-36324 of 2010 (O&M) -2- vide order dated 1.12.2010. Alleged compromise shows that petitioner is pressurizing the injured. Revolver is yet to be recovered from him. There are serious allegations against the petitioner. Hence, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused. In view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner-Daljit Singh Chahal for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 10.12.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge