IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 23819 of 2007 Between: 1 Smt. Kolan Venkata Chandrakala Reddy, W/o. K.V. Agi Reddy, R/o. Aliabad, Hyderabad. 2 K.V. Agi Reddy, S/o. K. Venkat Reddy, R/o. Aliabad, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 2 Special Grade Deputy College & Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, Ranga Reddy District. 3 The Tahsildar (Mandal Revenue Officer), Shamshabad Mandal, Shamshabad, Ranga Reddy District. 4 Kolan Lakshma Reddy, S/o. K. Venkat Reddy, R/o Aliabad, Hyderabad. 5 Smt. K. Lalitha Narayana Reddy, W/o. K. Narayana Reddy, R/o. Peda Golconda, Raikunta Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the 1st respondent vide Case No. D1/3758/2006, dated 4-8- 2007 and quash the same in so far as it is against the petitioners herein as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to law and pass such other or further orders as are necessary. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.P.CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled by the petitioners aggrieved by the orders dated 4.8.2007passed by the 1st respondent – Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District conﬁrming orders passed by the 2nd respondent dated 5.7.2006. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as by the learned counsel for the unoﬃcial respondents that the matter is settled out of court and that the government is not in any way affected. In view of the above, the writ petition is closed requiring no further orders. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.04.11.2008 msv