IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 3939 of 2003 Between: B. Sunanda s/o B. Ramulu R/o STD Booth, Gandhinagar, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad Rep by its Commissioner, Tankbund, Hyderabad 2 The Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad rep by its Addl. Commissioner, East Zone Abids, Hyderabad 3 The Municipal Corporation of Hyderbad rep by its The City Planner, East Zone, Abids, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 14-02-2003 is illegal arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to Article 14 and 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to consider the Writ petitioner representation dt 14-02-2003 Counsel for the Petitioner :MS.M.VENKATESWARI Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.KALPANA EKBOTE The Court made the following : ORDER : Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. ___________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J. 30th June, 2009. skmr