IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.9142 of 2010 LALLAN YADAV son of Late Lakhan Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 17.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 147, 149, 337, 353, 332, 224 and 225 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was initially accused in Fatuha P.S. case no. 345 of 2009, but he escaped from the jail custody on account of which Alamganj P.S. case no.199 of 2009 under section 224 of the Indian Penal Code was instituted against him. Thereafter, when the petitioner was again sought to be arrested in Fatuha P.S. case no.345 of 2009, once again on his shouting number of villagers gathered and got the petitioner freed and the petitioner fled away from custody for which the present case was instituted. It has been submitted that the petitioner has been released on bail in the original case and now is in custody since 11.12.2009 in the present case and undertakes to be more responsible in future and will be well represented on each date for which the brother of the petitioner will stand surety for him. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, in connection with Khusrupur P.S. case no.183 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That - 2 - one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. Another bailor shall be the brother of the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)