1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3803 OF 2005 Auto Body (Bombay) Pvt.Ltd. ..Petitioner. Vs. Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation and Ors. ..Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3804 OF 2005 Arco Engineers ..Petitioner. Vs. Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation and Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Saroj h/f Mr.S.V.Pitre for the Petitioner. Mr.V.P.Vaidya for the Respondents. .... CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : A.P.SHAH, A.P.SHAH, A.P.SHAH, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. JJ. JJ. 15th June, 2005. 2 P.C. : Mr.Vaidya, learned counsel for the Respondents states that Condition No.7 in the Appendix relating to the requirement of office having been situated within the radius of 50 km. has been withdrawn and thus, nothing further survives in the Petitions. Both the Petitions are dismissed.