IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P. Nos. 4242 & 4243 2010 Decided on: 5th August, 2010. 1. 4242 of 2010 Savita Thakur Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others Respondents 2. 4243 of 2010 Dharam Paul Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge For the Petitioner: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Advocate For the State: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General. For Respondent No. 4: Mr. B.C. Negi, Advocate _______________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioners are aggrieved since no reservation, as such, is provided in terms of the backward area, in the matter of admission to I.G.M.C., Shimla. It is pointed out that reservation is given in Tanda Medical College and in the Dental College at Shimla. By order, dated 23rd July, 2010, this court permitted the petitioners to move the Government. Petitioners have moved accordingly. But, by order, dated 31st July, 2010, the government has rejected their representation(s), holding that policy now taken by the government would satisfy the requirement, in terms of the backwardness of the area. In case the change in the policy is required, in terms of the submission, as made in the writ petition, it is for the petitioners and the people concerned to move the government and satisfy them that they still require reservation in I.G.M.C., Shimla also. In the event of parties moving the government, as above, the matter will be duly considered, in terms of the submissions made in the representation(s) and appropriate action in the matter will be taken before issuing the prospectus for the next academic year. The writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice ( Rajiv Sharma), August 5, 2010(K) Judge