IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WP/836/2011 VIJAYMALA RATAN SAWLE V/S THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS. ... Shri A.V.Patil, Advocate for petitioner Smt. A.V.Gondhalekar, AGP for respondent 1 and Shri P.R.Tandale, Advocate for respondent 2. Respondent 3 – served. ... CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE & S.B.DESHMUKH, JJ. Dated : June 9, 2011 PER COURT :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner made the following prayers :- "(b) By issuing appropriate writ, order or directions, the respondent No.2 Zilla Parishad, Latur be directed to transfer the petitioner under it as per government policy and as per the proposal dated 14th August 2009 submitted by respondent No.3 Zilla Parishad, Nanded and for that purpose necessary directions be issued. (c) By issuing a further appropriate writ, order or directions, the respondent No.2 Zilla Parishad, Latur be directed to take appropriate decision on the proposal dated 14th August, 2009 submitted by respondent No.3 Zilla Parishad, Nanded and for that purpose necessary directions be issued. (2) WP/836/2011 3. Respondent No.2 has filed reply affidavit to the Writ Petition and in paragraph No.3 thereof, has stated thus : " I say and submit that the petitioner is at Sr.425 in seniority list prepared by the present respondent in respect of the Inter District Transfer proposals. It is submitted that NOCs have been issued to 34 Asstt. Teachers for their transfer only from the category of Schedule Caste upto 08.10.2010. The present petitioner is at Sr.No.41 in the said list prepared category wise for issuance of NOC for transfer. Therefore, NOC has not been given to the present peion4er for transfer by the present respondent. Same is position till the date. Unless, there is vacancy from particular category of which present petitioner belongs to i.e. S.C., present respondent is unable to issue NOC in her name. I say and submit that the seniority list is being prepared separately for every class of category. ........" 4. Having regard to the prayers made in the Writ Petition and the statements made on oath in paragraph No.3 of the reply, we do not find any reason to keep this Writ Petition pending any further. We hope and trust that respondent No.2 shall issue no objection certificate to the petitioner at the earliest. 5. With these observations, Writ Petition is disposed of. (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) akl