IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITIOIN NO. 156/2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3368/2010 (Dr. Sadique Hussain Sheikh vs. Pranali Chitnis, Dy. Secretary, Mah. State) ...................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ...................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. S.R.Narnaware, counsel for petitioner. ... CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2010. This petition complaints of the willful disobedience/breach of the order dated 23rd July, 2010, passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 3368/2010, which is reproduced below. “Heard. Notice before admission returnable on 06.08.2010. Ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (iii).” 2] This court has granted ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (iii) of the said writ petition. However, neither the copy of the petition is placed on record to point out what the prayer clause (iii) was in Writ Petition No. 3368/2010, nor there is any specific averment in the petition as to what was the prayer clause (iii) formulated in the writ petition. 3] The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in breach of the order of status-quo, an order of reversion has been passed by the respondent on 31st July, 2010, which is annexed to the petition. However, it has not been stated in the petition that, in terms of prayer clause (iii) of the petition, there was a stay granted by this Court to the order of reversion of the petitioner from the post of District Deputy Commissioner to the post of Life Stock Development Officer. These material facts are not pleaded in the petition. 4] The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has mentioned in paragraph 2 of the petition that this Court has granted stay to the effect, operation and implementation of the show cause notice dated 7th July, 2010. However, it is no where stated in the petition as to what was the show cause notice. 5] The petition is, therefore, dismissed on that sole ground. This, however, shall not prevent the petitioner from filing the separate petition in accordance with law. JUDGE Rvjalit