IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 4 of 1993 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? @ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus AMORA CHEMICALS PVT. LTD. -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BB NAIK for the Petitioner MR RK PATEL for the Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE and MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Date of decision: 28/08/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA) The following question of law has been referred to this Court at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Baroda, for Assessment Year 1983-84 : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the rental income from Bank of Baroda was taxable under the head "income from business"? 2. It is common ground between the parties that the question is concluded by decision rendered by this Court in I.T.R. No. 79 of 1988 today and, hence, it is not necessary to set out the facts in detail. 3. The question referred is, therefore, answered in the affirmative, that is, in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. The reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. (A.R. Dave, J.) (D.A. Mehta, J.) (hn)