1 4.wp-1957-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi WRIT PETITION NO. 1957 OF 2010. Prof. Dinesh M. Parab. ..Petitioner. vs. The Principal, K.P.B. Hinduja College of Commerce & Ors. ..Respondents. .... None for Petitioner. None for Respondents. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 8TH NOVEMBER 2011. P.C. : On 11th January 2011, this Court [Coram : S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.] dismissed the above Writ Petition for want of prosecution by passing the following order : “1] This matter was on my board yesterday and after arguing the matter for some time, learned Counsel Mr. Gore sought time to peruse the record and make submissions. The matter was adjourned earlier on number of occasions. In fact it came to be dismissed and later on it was restored by an order dated 25th October 2010 passed in Notice of Motion No. 544 of 2010. 2] It was made clear to Mr. Gore that if he fails to remain present, this Court will proceed to dismiss the matter for want of prosecution. Mr. Gore assured this Court that he will argue the matter at 11.00 a.m. When it was called out today at 11.00 a.m., neither Mr. Gore nor the Advocate on record for petitioner were present. The matter was kept back. Even on second call none appeared for petitioner. Petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.” 2. Thereafter, a Notice of Motion being No. 132 of 2011 was taken out by the Petitioner for restoration of the Writ Petition. The 2 4.wp-1957-10 Notice of Motion was allowed by an order dated 1st April 2011 [Coram : Anoop V. Mohta, J.] and the Writ Petition was restored to file. 3. Today, when the Writ Petition was called out, once again, none appear for the Petitioner. In view thereof, it is established beyond any doubt that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is therefore dismissed for want of prosecution. [ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]