FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.1793 OF 2009 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Mr.P.S.Dani i/b Shailesh Chavan for the petitioners. Mr.Vinay Masurkar, G.P. for respondent nos.1 to 3. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATED: 3RD FEBRUARY, 2009. DATED: 3RD FEBRUARY, 2009. DATED: 3RD FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned G.P. for respondent nos.1 to 3. The other respondents are absent, though served. 2. The order dated 30th December, 2008 and 13th January, 2009 passed by the Members of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal in M.A.No.356 of 2008 in Transfer/Original Application No.720 of 2008 are under challenge. The petitioners were wait list candidates and since the candidates from ex-servicemen category were not available they were selected and sent for training of the P.S.I. The O.A. has been filed challenging all these aspects. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in any event the petitioners will stand selected for the available posts of ex-servicemen and hence, they may be allowed to continue the training subject to decision of O.A. The learned A.G.P. fairly agreed for allowing the petitioners to continue their training subject to the decision of the O.A. pending before M.A.T. In the circumstances the impugned orders are set aside and we allow the petitioners to continue the training subject to outcome of the O.A. Hearing of O.A. is expedited. The petition is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)