ndm 1 ss.3235.93.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3235 OF 1993 The Sangli Bank Limited. ... PLAINTIFF Vs. Siddharam S.Mahanad and anr. ... DEFENDANTS -------------- Ms. Pallavi K. Khangaonkar i/b Mrs. A.W.Barve for Plaintiff. -------------- CORAM : R.V. MORE, J. DATE : 26th November, 2009. P.C. 1 The Summary Suit was placed on board on 19 th November, 2009. On that date, this Court has passed following orders: “In the present suit, the Plaintiff has not taken any action as contemplated under the provisions of Rule 227 of the Original Side Rules, 1980 including steps to serve the Defendants. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiff, however, seeks a week’s time to take instructions. By way of last change, a week’s time is granted to the Plaintiff. Stand over to 26 th November, 2009.” ndm 2 ss.3235.93.sxw 2 Today, the suit is placed under the caption “dismissal” for non compliance under the provisions of Rule, 227 of the Original Side Rules, 1980. The learned counsel for the Plaintiff has not given any explanation for Plaintiff's failure to serve the Defendants inspite of the fact that writ of summons was issued to Plaintiff on 17.09.1993. In that view of the matter, the suit is dismissed for non compliance under the provisions of Rule 227 of the Original Side Rules, 1980. [ R.V. MORE, J ]