1 S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO.1233/2005 (Bhanwar Lal Vs. Tarachand) Date of order : 15.1.2007 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. G.R. Punia, for the petitioner. Mr. J.R. Choudhary, for the non-petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the non-petitioner and perused the impugned order. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 4.5.2005, which has been passed by trial court upon the order passed by this Court on 3.7.2003 in SB Criminal Misc. Petition No.242/2003 whereby the learned Single Judge has observed that the objections raised by the petitioner shall be considered and decided by the trial court before proceedings further. Learned counsel for the petitioner while attacking upon the finding of the trial court has contended that the finding given by the learned trial in the impugned order is adverse to him. Therefore, he prays for quashing of the impugned order dated 4.5.2005. Learned counsel for the non-petitioner contends that the impugned order does not require any 2 interference by this Court. Having gone through the impugned order and heard learned counsel for the parties, I do not find any good ground for interference by this Court in exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The petition stands dismissed. However, it is made clear that the findings given by trial court in the impugned order dated 4.5.2005, while deciding the objections raised by petitioners as ordered by this Court vide order dated 3.7.2003 passed in SB Criminal Misc. Petition No.242/2003, shall not come in way of either of the parties in the trial and final adjudication of the matter. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. arun