IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 24TH JANUARY 2011 / 4TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 2399 of 2011(Y) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- PAUL SEBASTIAN, PUTHUSSERY HOUSE, KUNNUKARA PO, NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS. SRI.J.JULIAN XAVIER, SRI.FIROZ K.ROBIN. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF CIVIL SUPPLIES (BOARD OF REVENUE) CIVIL SUPPLIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM - 682 030. 4. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, ERNAKULAM - 682 030. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/01/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.2399 OF 2011(Y) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner has been appointed as ARD No.167 under the 4th respondent. While so, his licence was suspended by Ext.P5 order for the reasons mentioned therein. Appeal filed by the petitioner was rejected by Ext.P7 order of the 3rd respondent. Against that order revision was filed before the 2nd respondent which resulted in Ext.P9 order dated 21.12.2010 setting aside the impugned orders and directing the 3rd respondent to pass fresh orders in the matter. At that stage, the petitioner submitted Ext.P10 representation before the 4th respondent requesting that he be permitted to resume the business. It is complaining of in action on the representation and seeking appropriate orders in the matter the writ petition is filed. 2. Now that pursuant to Ext.P9, the 3rd respondent is seized of the matter, at this stage all that is required is that the 3rd respondent should carry out the directions Ext.P9 and pass orders in the matter. WPC.No. 2399/2011 :2 : 3. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing that on the production of a copy of the judgment the 3rd respondent will carry out the directions in Ext.P9 on the question of suspension of the petitioner. The matter will be considered and orders in this behalf will be passed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks thereafter. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 3rd respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/