IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 22ND KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 32505 of 2009(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SASIDHARAN, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.NEELAKANDAN, SONALAYAM, MANJALLOOR MURI, PATHANAPURAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TAXES (A) DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, EXCISE COMMISSIONERATE, PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, KOLLAM. 4. THE EXCISE INSPECTOR, EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.32505 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT The issue raised by the petitioner in this matter is covered against the petitioner by the judgment of this Court in Komalan v. State of Kerala & Others [2009(2) KLT 744]. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner states that Ext.P6 interim order has been issued by the Apex Court in a similar case. Whatever that be, Komalan's case governs the situation as far as this Court is concerned, as of now. The immediate complaint of the petitioner is that Ext.P9, seeking variation of Ext.P8 order of cancellation of licence, is not gaining appropriate attention. Hence, refusing all other reliefs, this writ petition is ordered directing that Ext.P9 shall be considered and orders issued thereon within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.13/11.