IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41993 of 2010 MANOJ BHAGAT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner in a Police Case under Sections 384, 387, 307, 323, 324 and 120(B) of the Penal Code and Section 4/5 of the Explosive Substance Act is of false implication. The First Information Report specifically names and identifies the petitioner as one of the named accused who were fleeing after having thrown a bomb to threaten the shopkeeper demanding extortion money. That co-accused may have been granted regular bail is a matter to be more appropriately considered in a regular bail application of the petitioner. The application is rejected. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)