- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. jmi SUIT NO.162 OF 1990. Dr.Rangnath Bharadwaj. ..Plaintiff. vs. Geeta R. Bharadwaj & Anr. ..Defendants. .... Ms.S.A. Mudbidri, for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant. .... CORAM CORAM CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 4TH MARCH, 2009 : 4TH MARCH, 2009 : 4TH MARCH, 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This suit was listed on board on 4th February 2009, when the Advocate for the plaintiff had sought 4 weeks time as a last chance to verify the whereabouts of the plaintiff. The suit was adjourned to 3rd March 2009. On 3rd March 2009, the plaintiff and their Advocates were absent. The suit was therefore adjourned to 4th March 2009, i.e. today for dismissal. 2. Today, the suit has appeared under the caption "For Dismissal". Again, the plaintiff and their Advocates are absent. This Court is, therefore, constrained to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution. 3. The suit is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. - 2 - [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.] J.] J.]