<^'-.. w' II! 1\ IMiililiis.l ^, •¥:^::-HIGH^OI.fflffiOE^HA^ISeARM^^.BUJkS^ ''••.^•DfiasjoiisEi^;-.:;,':.';.;' .CQ^W:;l;JHON'BlJgSl-UM^R&^EV:GUPT|A,:^ ;.ll'HON'BI|^^R^SUNIiiaKl^^ Abpellant fgtittonai^ Writ^ioiBealNo.lMofZOIO Vyay Dybey^^^^S^ ; j Hridaxanar^ ^ yeare, Resident of^ T ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ Goyt Pnmary SchoOI <^ Anibilopur, OiSitnetSurguja(C<3> % ••""Versuy':.:^ • : /':::':;"" 1: . ^." •',,t^ ;,,'g1^^fS|s^<MB@tet|ltS^art^g^:^p^^ :;,1he| :'.^:..:,'^^^|^|s!i||BE3ep|itl|||^ ^:''-:'<:T^liBhimi|inSRaip^%<iTi;s-'::^^ 2 The Dire^lBr GieneFal of foliee^PQttGel 1-leadquairters, RaipUr(CG) ^ 3 The AsSistant Inspector (Seneral of Pbitee (Peisorifiel), Poliee Neadquarters, Raipur(G(^ - 4 The lSu|»nnter^^ of ? Po|K;e, AmbikapHF, DistrictSurguj9(©G) WntftiMicaluhclCTSection^MToftfceGtitiattisaartilMiahsCourt ;.'si''';:;{ftDi^lW:Division5B6aic®aKetg20( l'".%1''^^ ^•":., Present: ShnVKRandev, cotln^rM^lTeiaMiellaht. Shri WshoreSha^u^^ditiCHlslAdvoc^ ©er» the aate/respondente, :J:uclament-,'-:!''-' /:...::. : : -:1-'' -• •.:,::$--^i{stS iHi^eN:'.1^-::'^ The foUovwng juclgn [^ of th®©ourt^^ RajeevGup^C.J.';;?'/'', ' :1':;:^'''.;:::' ^ ::: • t^rne(tGOun^^oT^lie^^^ petitionfQrroridcirl^ion^thedetay^ffl SilBBB 2) Gn due consideration of the subrnissions of the leamed counselforthepartiesandthegroundstakeninttTe^appliGation|we aresatisfiedth^theappellanthassuciceededinshowjngsufficjent causeforthedelayinfiUngthewritappeal. 3)IANo^/2QlQi,1heref6re,isatlowedandthedetayof40days jn SRIing^the wffit appeat i& hereby condoned. 4) Leam&dcQunselforthepartiesarehearcfronaclmission. 5) Appellant Vi|ay Dubey has filed this writ appeal against the impugnedorderdated 25.03.2)10 passedinWritPetition (S) N0.6812^007; 6) The appellant/petitjoner flley the writ petition forthe foltowing retiefs^ ' "7.1 The 1-lon'ble Court may landly be pleased to issue notice^ to the respondents retumable within eariydateofhearing. 7.2 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pteasedto issueawritinthenatureofcertiorariforquashingthe impugned order dated 06.07.1999 vide Annexure P-3 and order datel 07.06.M03 videAnnexure P-6. 7.3 The Hon'ble Gourt may kindlybe pleasedto issue a writ in the nature of mandamusdirecting the respondents to reinstate the petitioner on ttie post of." Constable with all consequential beneftts and back :wages:.: ''.:: •.:;" :1 '"•''•• ;'..1;:;'-'' :::. 7.4 The^lon'ble Court ms^ tdnctl^ be pleased to grantanyothierancillaryrelie^asltmaydeemfltand properin thefactsandcircumstanGesorihecase. 7.5 Costoflhepetition." 7) The appetlai^etitioner; ^lnis, ms^ quashing of the orderdated 06.07.1999 whereby his apppintment on the post of Cpnstabfe ^was cancelled and the order datedi 07.06.^)03whereby eappellant'srepresentationwasrejected. j 8) The appellant was appbinted on the post of Constable by Way:of compassipnate appointiflent on 30.04.1997 with thespecific conditionthathewouldpassCl^sXwithinaperiodoftwoyears. AstheappeBantcouldnotpassClassXwithinthestipulatedperiod oftwo years. his appCrtntmeirt was^^^^^^ videorderciated 06.0^^999, whichv^H^ petition. 9) Shi1VKPandey,teamedcounsel fbrtheappellantcould not dlspute thatthe essential educational qualification for the post of ConstableisClassX.ltalsocouldnotbedisputedbyhimthatin the order of appointment of the appetlant it was specifically mentioned^hattheappointmentisontheconditionthathewould passClassXwithinaperiodoftwoyears.ltisatsonotindispute that the appellant could not pass Class X withtn a period of two years Trom the dateof his appointment on 30.04.1997. 10) OniiueeonsiderationoTtiesubmlssionsofteamedCQunsel forthepartiesancltheabovementionedbroaclfeaturesQfthecase we do not find any irffirmity ettherln the oi^r dated^.07.^ whereby appetlant's appointment to the post of Constabte was cancelled or the impugned order passed by learned Single Judge dtsmissirtgtheapp8lia"l'swritpetition. M 11) The tofra Goyrf appeat, dismissed summarity. . Sd/- ChiefJustice therefore, fails and is hfeeby Sd/- SuniIKumarSiDha Judge padma