-1- Civil Revision No.493 of 2011 (O&M). IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Date of Decision: March 15, 2011. Civil Revision No.493 of 2011 (O&M). Manmohan Singh and another ... Petitioners VERSUS Harbans Singh and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL. 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Satbir Rathore, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. H.S. Dhindsa, Advocate, for the respondents. -.- MOHINDER PAL, J. The petitioners-plaintiffs are aggrieved against the order passed by the trial Court whereby their application for production of original agreement dated 21.5.1992 or in the alternative for allowing them to lead secondary evidence in a -2- Civil Revision No.493 of 2011 (O&M). suit filed by the plaintiffs for declaration that the defendants are tenants over the suit land since 1992-1993 has been dismissed. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the fact that suit of the petitioners-plaintiffs is primarily based on the agreement dated 21.5.1992, interests of justice demand that the petitioners should be allowed to lead secondary evidence to prove the said agreement. Ordered accordingly. Of course, it will be the prerogative of the trial Court to judge the validity of the agreement in question or otherwise at the time of final arguments. This petition is disposed of accordingly. ( MOHINDER PAL ) March 15, 2011. JUDGE ak