\o-Q IN THEHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGrARH ATBILASPUR W.P. N0. 2-8 ,/2005 PETITIONER ^ 6 '^y^ ^^ RESPONDENTS ^c^ c,\s.^- -co?? ^^- B.P. Tiwari, S/o. Late Shri Chandrika Prasad Tiwari, aged about 48 years Working as Astt. R.I. (Hortitculture) '•• Municipal Corporation, Bhilai \- • '.".':' • • ... • • " '. 'Presently residing at Sector-7 Street No.35, Block No.4/L Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS ^ : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Thrpugh, Secretary Urban Adrainistration, and Deyelopm.ent Departm.ent, Mantralaya, Bha^yan Raipur (C.G.) /^ 2. Municipal Corporation Bhilai Through its Cpmm.issioner Bhilai, District Durg (C. G.) /' 3. DepUty Com.m.issioner Municipal Corporation, BhUai Distri.et Dzirg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE COITSTITUnONOFINDlA XI-HC-22 an^fTW f^iw3n^T ^iH tffe(f ?•-' d-°f-i|l'!lli'(-D,?TfNW,R"l<1y 31T^?T ffliwil sn*ii«n <<?)«»);: 1^.•(?.:-J.i.2^.- W( 2005" 3lA!ilg<<lllilltiRd .RItirdfl-l WRff tt'fecA<Rl^ ^af^ITSD^T 28.3A008 Arfiok Snamakar, cdujaael feir flie pctttionec. ShriAkhflAgrawal, Pa^d Lamycr -tfae State. Heaid on admisstMi. I Thc pctitioner who, -^as woridng as Asaistaat Reveaue In^ector (HorticuUuTe)' 'm wliich fi»mfhe Hortienlture Muniritpal Ctapoiatjon BhUai, has chaBeaged tbe vaMdlly <rforc(er dated 3.1.2005 (Aaaexutc P- 3) by Sectuan hc has bcen sent to thc Tax Section looldng to tfac necd| af worlr oa accoiurt of etidingg|fhc financial year. Learacd counscl &r ttic) petlttoner subnuta fhat tbc petitioner is teained in horticulture woipt aad he wffl aot bc ablc to pcribna tlte woA in Tax Section. He atoo subnnfts fhsrt the woid 'faansfcr' bas beea iised, fhcrefiMC, fhi^ order ahoidd toe qu^ihed. PeruSed the order an<|l BBCcads, fDed alDi^wilh fhc writ petttfon. In fact, by flic itnp^gned ordcr, fhe peti&aier has bccn sent to a diflfeteat Scctioa of ^hc samc C3orporation. Evea there is no change pf oflBce or towi(tdrip, Bofbi fhe brancslws of fhe Corpoiation are aituated in fh|e sanie ofl&ce. In fhe opmion^rfllus ii^ L^=rf>.A XI-HC-22 sii^r^r RHi+an^r stitfithtltgc] sunita 3^ anq^iq-^ ®Tn^'ls,I»fclltili< 3n^?r cra^i N11CTI shllin W[ 200 sn^TWiRKHfitT — 2-- Coiirt, the impugned order is tocal arraxigaaent within 3 iaclined to mterfere in this h|raaches of tfae same office, I am not ^rder (Anncxiue P- 8) p^sid by fhfi aufhori.ly. » The petitfon to disausse|l at the adxnission stagK itsdf. <fl<lT<-1<fl-< WRffff l^cfl'<Rl'KI< ^arf^q'gn^T < not a transfer otder but the same is Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge »y