IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 29008 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 03.10.2011 Jagtar Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Pankaj Mahavir, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. …. RAJESH BINDAL, J. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though the petitioner has been named in the FIR but no specific injury has been attributed to him. The injuries on the basis of which, offence under Section 307 IPC has been added are specifically attributed to the accused named in the FIR. There are general allegations that all the accused caused injuries. The petitioner is in custody since 16.6.2011. The aforesaid facts stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not disputed by learned counsel for the State. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions made above, in my opinion, the petitioner deserves concession of bail, pending trial. He is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Ropar. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 03.10.2011 sharmila