IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24765 of 2009 1. MUNIB YADAV 2. Sunil Yadav 3. Sudarshan Yadav 4. Pappu Yadav 5. Chandar Yadav @ Chamru Yadav 6. Vijay Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a Police case under Sections 144, 504, 307 and 506 of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The submission is that the allegations are omnibus in nature against nine accused. The present petitioners were not chargesheeted which was submitted only against three of the named accused when differing with the same cognizance has been taken against the petitioners also. The informant is the widow, contesting a criminal prosecution against the murderers of her own husband and in context of which the allegations have been made that the petitioners and others came to her house and threatened her to compromise the case. Those chargesheeted have been released on regular bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case in its entirety, this court is not persuaded to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail. 2 The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on shall be considered on its own merits including grant of bail to chargesheeted accused without being prejudiced by the present order. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)