CRM-M-32759-2011 [ 1 ] :::::::: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32759-2011 Date of decision:05.12.2011 Vikram Gulati @ Nanu ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. D.D.Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. A.S.Rai, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Rajesh Punj, Advocate, for the complainant. ***** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral) This is a petition for grant of regular bail in a pending trial case registered vide FIR No.131 dated 30.05.2010, under Sections 302, 307, 324, 148, 149 of IPC at Police Station Basti Jodhewal, Ludhiana. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, submits that deceased Gautam was allegedly attacked by Varinder Puri and Balwinder, whereas the petitioner is alleged to have caused injuries to one Tarandeep Sharma. He further submits that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR but lateron, in the supplementary statement of the father of the deceased, he has been named and has been arrested on 26.10.2011. He further submits that the role attributed to the petitioner is only for the injuries caused to Tarandeep Sharma about which Dr. Jasbir Singh, who had been examined as CRM-M-32759-2011 [ 2 ] :::::::: PW1, has already opined that the possibility of causing the said injuries with friendly hand cannot be ruled out or the same could have been self-suffered. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that so far the main accused have not been arrested by the police. He also submits that although the petitioner has not been named in the FIR but it has been found mentioned in the FIR that two Hindu boys have also caused the injuries. He also submits that the evidence in this case is going on. Learned State Counsel, on instructions received from ASI Avtar Singh, submits that the petitioner is neither a previous convict nor any other case is pending against him. Without making any observation on the merits, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and also in view of the fact that co-accused Amit Goyal has already been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 23.09.2011 passed in CRM-M-24456-2011, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. December 05, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE