IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN SUNDAY, THE 16TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 23RD KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 31483 of 2010(I) ------------------------- PETITIONER : ------------------ DR.G.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR, PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE, ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS. SRI.M.K.DAMODARAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI. M. BALAGOVINDAN SRI. T.K. ANANDA PADMANABHAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 3. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT. 4. VICE CHANCELLOR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT. 5. UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY BUILDING, TRIVANDRUM. 6. UNIVERSITY OF KANNUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY BUILDING, KANNUR. 7. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY BUILDING, KOTTAYAM. 8. COCHIN UNIVERSITY FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, ERNAKULAM. ...2/- WP(C).No. 31483 of 2010(I) -2- 9. SREE SANKARA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, KALADY, ERNAKULAM. 10. NATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOR ADVANCED LEGAL STUDIES, REPRESENED BY ITS REGISTRAR, KOCHI. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. ANTONY MUKKATH R3 & R4 BY ADV. SRI. P.C. SASIDHARAN, SC, CALICUT UNIVERSITY R5 BY ADV. SRI. M. RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC, KERALA UNIVERSITY R6 BY ADV. SRI. M. SASINDRAN, SC, KANNUR UNIVERSITY R7 BY ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G. UNIVERSITY R8 BY ADV. SRI. P. CHANDRASEKHAR, SC, COCHIN UNIVERSITY BY ADV. SRI. ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI, SC BY ADV. SRI. P.K. VIJAYA MOHANAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ----------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.31483 OF 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of November, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner while working as principal of the Government Law College, Thiruvananthapuram, certain proceedings were initiated against him on certain allegations of misconduct. Subsequently, by Ext.P10 order, the petitioner has been transferred to Law College, Ernakulam. The petitioner is challenging Ext.P10 order in this writ petition. However, the petitioner now submits that he would be presently satisfied with a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P11 representation filed in this regard expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader appearing for the Government also. Having heard both sides, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P11 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, W.P.(C)No.31483/10 2 after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as any other person who may be affected by any favourable orders to the petitioner. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd W.P.(C)No.31483/10 3