HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIséARH QT BIgSPUR i M A No 528 of 2005 Harendm Singh, 5/0. La¥e Shri Baju Rajo Singh, Aged abou‘r 45 years, R/a. Labour Colony, Near Durga Man6ir ‘ Chowk, Zane 3, Khursipar', Bhiiai, Dis Durg (C.6.) Appeilam, Plaln‘hff ‘ ‘ ‘ < \ \ ‘ Versus Respanden'rs 1. Dukhmc'myan Slo Shri Motilail ‘ Defandan‘rs Qr No 5B S‘rr'ee'r No 6 Sector N02 : ‘ ‘ Bhllm Tahsll & Dusfmrf Bur-g (6.6) ‘ 2. Stag! Author-11y of India Ltd, Through _ its Managing Director, Office - Ispof‘ . Bhawan' Bhilai, Dis‘rric'l' burg (C.6.) 3. UCO Bank. Thmugh iTs Branch Manager, Branch Office, SecTor No.1, Bhiiai. Tahsil & Distburg (C.6.) (MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 (i) (r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PkOCEDURE, 1908) ($3: Hon‘bie Mr. T.P. sharma. J.) Ms Farho MmhaJ counsel appears on behaif of Mrs Fouzm Mirza counsel for The appelian‘r ORAL ORDER (Passed on 19*“ June, 2009) The appellan? has filed This upped agains? fhe order dated 8.4.2005 passed by the First Additional DisTricf Judge, Durg, in Civii Sui? No. 74-3/04 whereby fhe iearned Firs? Additionqi Disfricf Judge has dismissed the application filed hy the appellant only on the ground that the appellant has claimed two reliefs in one application. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file appropriate and separate 1 t -2- appkicafioin for considerafion before The trial Court if so advised and ‘ QCCQSIOV! Grlses’ Thei appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with The aforesaid“ iiberiy. Howaver'g if is made dear. that The trial Cour? has notdecidehd “ihg applicmioh on merits and has dismissed only on The ground that The appellani§has claimed Two reliefs in one applicaiion. Na order as 1'0 cost i Sd/- T. P. Sharma Judge