WP(C) 3887/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA Heard Ms. K. Devi, learned counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner was that, on his voluntary retirement w.e.f. 01. 02.2005, he was not paid the outstanding leave salary despite his repeated appro aches. On 12.09.2011, when the matter was taken up by this Court, Mr. N. Goswami, learn ed Standing Counsel, ASEB, was asked for obtaining necessary instruction. On 21. 11.2011, on the prayer of learned Standing Counsel, ASEB, the matter was deferre d to enable him to take necessary instruction. Today, Mr. Goswami, learned Stand ing Counsel, ASEB, has produced the written instruction and submits that the lea ve salary will be released very shortly in favour of the petitioner, namely Sri Subir Kumar Roy. A copy of the written instruction as produced by the learned Standing Counsel, A SEB, dated 14.12.2011 is marked as ’X’ and kept in the file. Since the respondents are proceeding to release the leave salary of the petition er shortly, the matter has become infructuous. Before parting with the petition, the respondents are directed to pay the outsta nding leave salary of the petitioner within 15(fifteen) days from today. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of.