IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 459 OF 2008 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 459 OF 2008 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 459 OF 2008 Chadrashekhar Krishnan Narayan.... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra anr....... Respondent. Shri S.V.Marwadi i/b S.P.Narkar for the petitioner. Ms. A.J. Zaveri APP for State Shri Bhatia for Respondent no.2. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 3RD MARCH, 2008 DATED; 3RD MARCH, 2008 DATED; 3RD MARCH, 2008 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. Rule. Rule made returable forthwith. Taken up for final hearing by consent of parties. 2. The order passed by the trial court refusing to issue withess summons as requested by the accused had given raise to filing of a revision before the Sessions Judge. During pendency of the revision, by granting ad-interim stay, the proceedings of the trial court came to be stayed. The stay was continued. However, by an order dated 22-2-2008 the stay has been vacated solely on the ground that the argument is part-heard. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the revision has been partly heard. If this be the position the order vacating stay cannot be justified. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, so also the respondent no.2, in all fairness submits that this writ petition be disposed of by continuing the stay till decision of the revision. In the result, the proceedigs on the file of the trial court shall remain stayed till the decision of the revision. The impugned order vacating the stay passed by the Sessions Judge dated 22-2-2008 is quashed ad set aside. Writ peititon is thus disposed of. Rule made absolute in the above terms. ......