1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.144/2009. (Masjid-O-Madrassa Ahle Sunnat Latifiya Vs. Madarsa Darul Uloom Hansiya Sunniya and Ors.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.AD Shinde, Adv. For petitioners; Mr.GD Shaikh, Adv. For Resp.Nos. 1, 2, 5 to 10; Mr.SB Khan, Adv. h/for Mr.MBW Khan, Adv. For Resp.No.152; Mr.VB Ghatge, AGP for Resp.No.154 *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 24 th November, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) Rejection of application (Exhibit-5) in Suit No. 69/2009 before the learned Wakf Tribunal, Aurangabad is impugned by the plaintiffs in the revision. 3) On hearing the learned Counsel and perusal of the record, I find there is no illegality or perversity in the order questioned. The learned Judge, seized with the record found that there was a duly appreciated permission from the Charity Commissioner, which was in tune with the direction issued by the principal seat of this Court at Bombay. The procedure, as was expected to be complied with in terms of section 36, 2 was indeed adhered to. The plaintiff could not establish that he has any interest in the property or was owner at the material time. 4) In this scenario of the situation, I do not see any illegality in the order dated 20th September, 2009. CRA lacks merit, dismissed. No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/