IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID MONDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2008 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 RP.No. 1255 of 2008() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A. NO.2134/2008 IN MA.540/2008 Dated 27/08/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT IN I.A./RESPONDENT IN MAT.APPEAL: ---------------------- M.PRAVEEN @ PRAVEEN KUMAR, S/O.KUMARAN RESIDING AT.MODOLATHIL HOUSE, VADAKARA AMSOM DESOM, VADAKKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER IN I.A./APPELLANT IN MAT. APPEAL. ---------------- PRASEEJA, D/O.RAJAN, RESIDING AT KRISHNALAYAM, VADAKARA TALUK, AZHIYUR VILLAGE AZHIYUR AMSOM DESOM, KOZHIKODE. ADV. SRI.RAJIT THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: KURIAN JOSEPH & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ. --------------------------------------------------------- R.P. NO. 1255 OF 2008 IN I.A. NO. 2134 OF 2008 IN MAT APPEAL NO. 540 OF 2008 --------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of December, 2008 O R D E R Harun-Ul-Rashid, J. This Review Petition is filed by the respondent in the above Matrimonial Appeal seeking review of the interim order passed by this Court dated 27.8.2008. By the said order, this Court had directed the respondent/husband to pay maintenance to the appellant/wife at the rate of Rs.1,500/- per month till the disposal of the appeal. The order was passed on the application filed by the wife. 2. Before passing the order, this Court had opportunity to interact with the parties on several occasions. Finding the sad plight of the appellant/wife, we had made earnest efforts for reconciliation and reunion. The respondent/husband did not co-operate. The Family Court had directed the respondent/husband to pay Rs.500/- per month. We had R.P. NO.1255/2008 2 found that the appellant is capable of paying maintenance at the rate of Rs.1,500/- per month. There is no error apparent on the face of the record. Hence, we find no reason to review the order. The Review Petition is accordingly dismissed. Post the appeal for hearing in the usual course. Need not be treated as part heard. (KURIAN JOSEPH) JUDGE (HARUN-UL-RASHID) JUDGE sp/ R.P. NO.1255/2008 3 KURIAN JOSEPH & HAURN-UL-RASHID, JJ. R.P. NO. 1255 /2008 IN I.A. NO. 2134/2008 IN MAT.APPEAL NO.540/08 O R D E R 1st December, 2008 R.P. NO.1255/2008 4