1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN INSOLVENCY rpa I. R. N. NO. 12 OF 2010 IN INSOLVENCY PETITION NO. 9 OF 2006 Re : Mahima Variety House & Ors. ... Insolvents Mr. Amit Jain .. Petitioning Creditors Ex-parte :- The Official Assignee of Bombay. .. Petitioner .... None present for both the side. Mr. Y. C. Parikh, Official Liquidator-present. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 2, 2010. P.C. The Rule Nisi was sought to be served on the insolvent on 30th January, 2010. However, the son of the insolvent No. 3 after contacting his father over the phone informed the representative of the Official Assignee that he will inform his father, the insolvent about the issuance of Rule Nisi and to attend the insolvency Court on 2nd February, 2010 at 11.00 a.m., without 2 fail. However, the son of the insolvent No.3 refused to accept the said Rule Nisi. The Rule Nisi was, therefore, pasted on the premises of the insolvent, by the representative of the Official Assignee. The insolvent has failed to remain present. Rule Nisi is, therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). [ S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ]