IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2011 / 8TH ASHADHA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 4949 of 2011() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.499/2011 OF CHANDERA POLICE STATION PETITIONER: -------------- DAVOOD. T, AGED 42 YEARS S/O.MOHAMMED, HANEEFA (LATE) CHIMMADAM HOUSE ARANGADI OF KANHANGAD SOUTH,KANHANGAD, KASARGOD. BY ADV. SRI.V.R.REKESH RESPONDENT: --------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ----------------------------------------------- Bail Appln.No.4949 of 2011 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 29th day of June, 2011 ORDER In this Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is accused No.3 in Crime No.499 of 2011 of Chandera Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 498(A) I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail. 2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. 3. After evaluating the factors and parameters which are to be taken into consideration in the light of paragraph 122 of the verdict dated 2-12-2010 of the Apex Court in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra and Others (2010 (4) KLT 930), I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in- charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the above case on his executing a bond for `25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the said officer and subject to the following conditions:- 1. The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays till the filing of the final report. Bail Appln.No.4949/2011 : 2 : 2. The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation including custodial interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer. 3. The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution. 4. The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail. 5. The bail granted pursuant to this order shall be in force till the end of the trial of the case unless and until it is cancelled by this Court in accordance with paragraph 103 of the verdict in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre's case (supra). If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above. Dated this the 29th day of June, 2011. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. skj