J/ BEFQRF, THE HmwELE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. w.P. No. fggfi (7 " m4 . Anand Kumar (3haubey, S/o Late Shri S‘ P. C2haubey, Aged abaut 44years, Wmking as copyi5t. Working in Chirpani Head Wovk Sub Dn. Nat (irrigation Depth) BODLA The.& Dist Kawaidha. \Ier5u5 ; 1 . State af Chhattisgarh. Thraugh $ecretary. krigatien Dept: DJK.S. Bhavan, RAIPUR (0G,) _ (Zhief Engineer) Petitioner Mahanad3 Godavaxi Basin, Water Re50urces depth, ( Wrigatian deptt) Shamkar Nagar, RAIPUR. Exesutive Engineerx Chirpani Project, (migatim Beptt), Kawardha K‘L‘Lonia Lower Divisinn Cierk Working in the office of t1” ecutive Engineer 5 ate: Resources Division ‘ irrigation Dept Kawardha Resgondents x;- WRIT PETlTiaN UNDER . ARTICLE 2261227 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF '5” iNUiA FQR GRANT OF WRIT QF. MANDAMUS . CERTIORARV OR IRECTIQN $F LDKE NATURE W 1 M h HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILAsPUR 5ingle Bench: Hon'ble Shri Safish K. Agniho‘l’ri, J. W. P. No. 3968 of 2004 Pefi‘l’ioner : Amnd Kumar' Chaubey Versus Respondents : The 51'u're of Chha‘Hisgarh & others Mr. N.K. Vyas, counsel for 1he pe1'ifioner. Shri Anupam Dubey, Panel lawyer for 'rhe respondenfs/Sfate. ORDER (Passed on 2nd day of January, 2007) 1‘ Learned counsel appearing for fhe pe'l'i'l'ioner submi‘l’s fhaf The pe'ri'rioner was appoin'l’ed on 4.4.1984 (Annexure P/1) on 'l'he post of Copyisf/Assf. Sub Divisiona! Clerk on daily wages basis in The office of The Sub-Divisional Officer, Chhirpani Canal Sub—Division No. 1 a‘l’ Badla, Tahsil Kawardha. Services of fhe pefi'lioner was +ermina+ed by oral order dufed 5.7.1986 wifhou'r affording any opporl‘uni‘ly of hearing. Being aggrieved, 'lhe pe‘ri'l'ioner filed an application before fhe Labour Cour'l' a‘l' Durg in Case No. 3/88 I.D. {Ref}. The Labour Cour‘l’, by order' dafed 19.7.1995 (Annexure P/2), direcfed reinsfa'lemen'l of ’rhe pe'l'i'l'ioner 1’0 fhe service wi'l'h 50% back wages. 3 Againsf 'lhe order da'l'ed 19.7.1995 (Annexure P/Z) passed by The Labour Court fhe Sfate/respondenfs filed a wrif pe‘rifion, being W. P. No. 108/97, before fhe High Courf of Madhya Pradesh a'l' Jabalpur. The High Cour‘l’ of Madhya Pradesh a'l' Jabalpour, vide order dafed 21.4.1997 . /‘ {Annexure P/3), confirmed The order of reinsfa‘remen'r and sef aside fhe order- of 50% back wages. The pefifioner has filed fhis pe‘fifion seeking regulariza'fian w.e.f. 29.3.90 i.e. from #he dm‘e of his coiiengues‘ services have been regularized wifh an consequen'h‘ai benefi‘rs affer adding due increment pay fixafion and all olher monefar'y benefil's payable 1*0 regular employee ' of his cafegory. If is well seifled principle of law lhaf ‘rhe daily wagers, femporary or ad hoc employees have no righf +0 1’he post seeking regularizai'ion and grant of regular pay scale, if ‘their appointmenfs were de-hors The cons'li'rufional scheme or The rules made under The proviso 1'0 Arficle 309 of 'l‘he Consfi'ru'rion of India. The pe'l'ifioner has no righi' 1’0 confinue/regularize or reinsfafe on fhe posi in view of cafena of decisions laid down by fhe Supreme Court The wri‘r pe‘fi'iion is accordingly dismissed. The responden‘is/S‘i’a're, in fheir return ai' para 8, has submif'l'ed 1ha'i fhe Chief Engineer, Mahanadi Godawari Kachhar, Raipur has passed an order of regulariza‘rion of daily wages employees. The case of ihe pe'l’i‘l’ioner would be considered for regularizafion as and when vacancy is available. In view of ihe s'raiemen'i made by 1he ’responden'is/S'iaie, fhe pefi'rioner may be considered for regularization, if any, on i'is own. The order of dismissal of The pefi'i'ion shall no? come in fhe way of The respondenfs/Sfafe while considering his case for regularization. Sdl- Bablu Saash K. Agnihmi Judge