1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NOS. 76 AND 95 OF 2010 WRIT PETITION NO. 76 OF 2010 Shri Ranjit D. Satardekar. ... Petitioner versus Police Inspector Ashish Shirodkar and others. ... Respondents Petitioner in person. Shri G. Shirodkar holding for Shri S. Vahidulla, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 6. Shri N. Thakkekar, Advocate for Respondent No.7. WRIT PETITION NO. 95 OF 2010 Smt. Vijaya R. Satardekar ... Petitioner versus Police Inspector Ashish Shirodkar and others. ... Respondents Shti T. George John, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri G. Shirodkar holding for Shri S. Vahidulla, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 6. Shri N. Thakkekar, Advocate for Respondent No.7. 2 CORAM : N. A. BRITTO, J, DATE : 9TH DECEMBER, 2010. P.C.:- Heard. Perused the Judgment of this Court in the case of Mrs. Alda Valezia Tereza Mergulhao v. Joaquim Jeronimo de Almeida and others(2006 (2) AIR Bom R 330). A document which is not in possession of the plaintiff is not required to be produced in Court when plaint is presented and if that be so it cannot be expected to be sent as an annexure to the plaint as required under O5, Rule 2, C.P.C. The Petitioner in person in Writ Petition No.76 of 2010 and Shri T. George John, learned Counsel on behalf of the Petitioner in Writ Petition No.95 of 2010 have made a categorical statement that all the documents listed which were in possession of the plaintiff have been given to the defendants and the other documents which are relevant will be produced at the appropriate stage in the suit. Accepting the said statements, and in view of the above, the Writ Petitions are hereby allowed and the impugned Orders are hereby set aside. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD