IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 27TH JULY 2010 / 5TH SRAVANA 1932 OP.No. 10910 of 2003(W) ----------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. MOHAMMEDALI, JUNIOR SCIENTIFIC OFFICER, REGIONAL CHEMICAL EXAMINERS LABORATORY, KOZHIKODE. 2. RAVEENDRAN P., JUNIOR SCIENTIFIC OFFICER, REGIONAL CHEMICAL EXAMINERS LABORATORY, KOZHIKODE. 3. DR.JOSEWIN B., JUNIOR SCIENTIFIC OFFICER, REGIONAL CHEMICAL EXAMINERS LABORATORY, KOZHIKODE. 4. DR.JAMEELA S.R., TECHNICAL ASSISTANT, CHEMICAL EXAMINERS LABORATORY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.SREEDHARAN NAIR SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. CHIEF CHEMICAL EXAMINER TO GOVERNMENT, CHEMICAL EXAMINERS LABORATORY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU FOR R1&2 THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: OP NO.10910 OF 2003 ORDER IN CMP NO.18710 OF 2003 IN OP NO.10910 OF 2003 DISMISSED 27/7/2010 SD/-ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ O.P. NO. 10910 OF 2003 (W) ===================== Dated this the 27th day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners 1 and 2 wants to withdraw the original petition. Accordingly, the original petition will stand dismissed as withdrawn in so far as petitioners 1 and 2 are concerned. 2. In so far as the grievance of the 3rd petitioner is concerned, the prayer in the original petition is not to revert him. Admittedly, the reversion has come into force and this prayer has been rendered infructuous. 3. In so far as the 4th petitioner is concerned, the prayer is to promote the petitioner to the post of Junior Scientific Officer. From the counter affidavit filed, it would appear that the respondents themselves have agreed to consider the claim of the 4th petitioner at the appropriate time. In view of the above, recording the above submission in the counter affidavit, original petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp