. 3 $rv20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2823/2011 MANJEET SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Ms.Pratima Parihar, Adv. _,_,, I versus '! STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, APP. Mr. R.S.Rana, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALl ORDER 0/o 22.09.2011 1. This is a petition for quashing of FIR No.489/2004 under Section 420/467/468/471/1206 IPC registered with P.S. Krishna Nagar, Delhi in respect of which trial is pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Karkardooma Courts. The ground for quashing FIR is that the petitioners and the respondentno.2/complainant are close relatives and they have settled their disputes. 2. Allegations made in the FIR by the complainant are that after the death of her husband, the petitioners who are very close relatives of her husband made her to sign certain cheques and withdrew the amount from her account. It has been stated that the complainant/respondent No.2 has been I ! -- Signing Date:27.08.2024 16:57:17 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified sufficiently compensated by repayment of the said amount withdrawn from her account and therefore she is not interested in pursuing the matter any further. 4. The petition is supported by affidavits of all the petitioners, who are present in Court and are duly identified by their counsel. Respondent No.2/complainant is also present and is ,-( identified by her counsel as well as by the IO. It is contended by the learned counsel for the parties since the parties are closely related and they have settled their disputes no useful 1• purpose would be served by continuing the FIR. 5. I have considered the submissions made by the respective sides. I am satisfied that the dispute is in the nature of family dispute and parties have settled their dispute, accordingly, FIR No.489/2004 under Section 420/467/468/471/1208 IPC registered with P.S. Krishna Nagar, Delhi and the consequent proceedings pending before the trial Court are quashed. 6. A copy of this order be sent to the trial Court. SEPTEMBER 22, 2011 mr ,-,s-\ r v V.K. SHALl, J i •• ·-;- ' ' ' .