IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 20TH DECEMBER 2010 / 29TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 RP.No. 292 of 2004(E) ------------------------------ [THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.37425/2003 DATED 12/03/2004] .................... PETITIONER: ------------------- BABU JOSE, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RETIRED), OLIYAPURAM HOUSE, ANGADI, KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.C.CHERIAN. RESPONDENT: ---------------------- KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.SANTHALINGAM, S.C, K.S.E.B. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P. No.292 of 2004 in W.P.(C)No. 37425 of 2003 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 20th day of December, 2010 O R D E R The petitioner in the writ petition seeks review of the following judgment dated 12.03.2004 in the writ petition: “Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders have been complied with and the D.C.R.G payable to the petitioner had been paid. As such, nothing more remains to be decided by this petition. The writ petition is accordingly closed.” The petitioner's contention is that although DCRG has been paid to the petitioner this court has not considered the claim of the petitioner for interest. When the learned Judge disposed of the writ petition without adverting to the other prayers, I am of opinion that it was a conscious decision refusing interest. That being so, the proper course available to the petitioner was to file an appeal against the judgment. Therefore I am not inclined to entertain this review petition and accordingly the same is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE shg/