IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2010 / 2ND POUSHA 1932 RP.No. 1165 of 2010() --------------------- IN WPC NO.32591 OF 2010 REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WPC --------------------------------------- AMBUJAKSHI, PUTHENPURAYIL, OLAKETTIYAMBALAM P.O., THEKKEKKARA, MAVELIKKARA - 690 510. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS IN WPC --------------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA P.O., ALAPPUZHA - 688 001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, MAVELIKKARA P.O., MAVELIKKARA - 690 101. 3. THE ADDL.TAHSILDAR, MAVELIKKARA P.O., MAVELIKKARA - 690 101. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, BHARANIKAVU P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT - 690 541. 5. SUPDT OF SURVEY, OFFICE OF THE SUPDT OF SURVEY, COLLECTORATE, ALAPPUZHA P.O., ALAPPUZHA - 680 001. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P. NARAYANAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- R.P. No.1165 of 2010 in W.P (C) No.32591 of 2010 -------------------------- Dated this the 23rd December, 2010 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner mainly is that while issuing directions in the judgment, this Court has not specified any time limit and therefore prejudice is caused. Having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader, it is directed that the directions in paragraph 2 of the judgment shall be complied with, at any rate within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. The judgment will stand modified as above. Review Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ma /True copy/ P.A to Judge W.P (C) No. 2010 2