CRLMB 1145/2010 Satyanarayan Vs. State (1) In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan At Jaipur Bench, Jaipur O R D E R In S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.1145/2010 Satyanarayan Vs. State of Rajasthan Date Of Order :: 9th February, 2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.N. Bhandari Mr. R.K. Charan, for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Poonia, Public Prosecutor. .......... Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. It is stated that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the matter due to some dispute regarding marriage, thus, petitioner may be granted bail. Recovery of currency notes cannot connect the petitioner with the alleged crime. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After considering the rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that the petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and I consider it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner namely, Satyanarayan on bail under section 439 Cr.P.C. in FIR No.01/2010 registered at Police Station-Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar for offence under sections 420, 392 & 323 of IPC provided he, furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before CRLMB 1145/2010 Satyanarayan Vs. State (2) that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (M.N. Bhandari),J. VS Shekhawat/- Jr. P.A. S58