IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10989 of 2011 SANNI KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 11.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner is languishing in custody since 02.10.2010 in a case registered under Sections 394, 395, 397 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of robbing the cash amount. The petitioner's name surfaced in the statement of co-accused. From the petitioner's possession Rs. 50,000/- were recovered. It is the case of the informant that he signed all the currency notes hence there was no need of putting them on T.I. Parade the said plea of informant has been rejected by the Bench of this Court while considering the bail application of other similarly situated accused persons. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has not been put on T.I. Parade till date. It is further submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and other accused persons have been granted regular bail by this Court. It is submitted by Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. for the State that the case diary reflects that the criminal antecedent has not been verified by the I.O. till date. Considering the fact that other accused persons have been granted bail by this Court, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 195 of 2010. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)