HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CRM No.M-810 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.05.2011 **** Murli Malhotra . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Sukh Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. MC Berry, Addl. AG Punjab **** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). It is not in dispute that the petitioner has complied with the order dated January 17, 2011. (2). For the reasons assigned in the order dated January 17, 2011, the same is made absolute. (3). Disposed of accordingly. Dasti. 10.05.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge