IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.275 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Central Excise Pune-II, Pune ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Ajanta Universal Fabrics Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.K.R. Chaudhary with Ms.S.D. Bhosale for the Appellant. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 30TH JULY, 2008 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. First submission made by the learned counsel was that additional evidence should not have been admitted by the tribunal. However, perusal of the order passed by the tribunal shows that no objection appears to have been raised to the admission of additional material before the tribunal on behalf of the revenue. Second contention raised was that co-relation chart was prepared in the presence of the assessee. Perusal of the order passed by the tribunal shows that the co-relation chart was prepared in the absence of the assessee or the assessee had no opportunity to see the chart before it was relied upon by the appellate authority. There is nothing on record to show that the co-relation chart was prepared in the presence of the parties or the parties were given any opportunity to submit their say in relation to the co-relation chart. 2. We do not see any question of law arises in this appeal. Hence, rejected. D.K. DESHMUKH, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J.