BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CH HATTISGARH AT \ PETITIONER / ) $INGLE BENCH / ayaram Nishad, S/o Jageshwar i Nishad, ageid about 50 years, working as peon Govt. Higher l Secondary STphool Sondka, Tahsil- Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1 .(gc/ate of Chhattisgarh ‘ Through— The Secretary Tribal ' _ Tribal Welfare > Department Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3." Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department 1 Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 4.5 Murlidhar Sharma, S/o KeShav Prasad Sharma, Assistant Grade — ' 3 III, “Govt.- High School Bijna, ' Block—Tamnar, (Raigarh) ‘Distt. {I‘ BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) w.p. tsr no. 7 g Z§ of 2010 ' ‘ Welfare, Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, v Mantralaya, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2 Commissioner Rajgarh (6.01.) gym Sunder Patel, S/o Jageshwa1" Prasad, aged about 38 years, Aseistant Grade —III, Govt. f r I (dd) Ofice of the Block Offlce ‘haramj aiggarh Distt. Raigarh €wR‘ITiPETIiéIQ6N xvyDER ARTIeLE 226 OF THE CQII :iifUTIoN OF INDIA. \ i 3.3.: HON’BLE JUST!CE MR. P INKER DIWAKER 13-12-2010- Shn Hansh Khuxmya coum 61 fo'r the petitioner. Shn Praveen Das, Dy G A hr th’e State. Heard on adxmssmn. By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of dimction to grant of promotion with all the consequential bandits. It is submitted that ‘the petitioner who was initially working as daily wage employes with effect from 10. 1 1.87, later on was regulan'zed in the year 20C 9, According to the petitioner though he has been regularize i but has not been given promotion on the post ofAssistant Grade'lll. Counsel for the peiitioner stbmits that his representation dated 29.10.2010 (Annexme P14) is pending before the competent authority and at this stage, the purpose would be served if he may be permitted to Withdraw this petition with a direction to the comyetent authority to decide the pending representation of the petitioner State counsel subm1ts that t the petitioner make a fresh authority and he has no obJection 1f any direction 1s b ‘ g 1ssued for decnimg his representation in accordance With law Acoordingly, the petitioner s permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a fresh representation to the authority concerned, within a pe 'od of three weeks’ from the date of receipt of copy of this o er and in turn it is expected non: the authorities concerned o decide the same within a [113% éfe’a representation to the concerne \Qb- k XI-HC—22 furtfler pen'od of six months fmlh the data of its receipt, in accordance with lam. \ it is made clear that this Court hés not axpressed any opinion on mexits of the case and the :authotity conccmed would be at liberty to decidc the re presentation of the petitioner strictly in_ accordance with law. r \ Sd/- f Prltmker Dlwaker / Y v Judge H V \xu we em {V ‘