IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.498 of 2009 Sulekha Kumari, Wife of Kamal Kumar Rai, Resident of Village Kalyanpur South Bishanpur, Tola Police Station Bibhutipur, District Samastipur …………………………….Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Department of Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director, I.C.D.S., Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Samastipur. 4. The District Welfare Officer, Samastipur. 5. The Block Development Officer, Bibhutipur, Samastipur. 6. The Child Development Project Officer, Bibhutipur, Samastipur. 7. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Kalyanpur Dakshin, Bibhutipur, Samastipur. 8. The Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Kalyanpur Dakshin, Bibhutipur, District Samastipur. 9. Sobha Devi, Wife of Amarjeet Kumar Rai, Resident of Village + Post Office Kalyanpur, Police Station Bibhutipur, Samastipur.......................Respondents ----------- 2 17.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against appointment of respondent no.9 as Anganwari Sevika, enquiry was held and it was found that in the process of selection, several irregularities were committed and petitioner, although having higher percentage of marks, was not considered. 2 However, it appears that the petitioner has filed a complaint before the Collector under the Guidelines. In the circumstances, petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh complaint before the Collector which shall be considered in accordance with law after complying with the Principles of Natural Justice and disposed of within a period of three months from the date of filing of the complaint. The writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)