IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2010 / 26TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 7743 of 2010(P) ------------------------- LAR.64/1991 of ADDL.SUB COURT,KOTTAYAM .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. JOSEPHKUNJU PAUL, S/O. C.J.PAULOSE, CHERIATHUNDATHIL HOUSE, VAZHAPPALLY KIZHAKKU KARA, VAZHAPPALLY VILLAGE. 2. JIO, S/O. GEORGEKUTTY, THEKKEVELLIYARA HOUSE, THYKKATTUSSERI KARA, THYKKATTUSSERI VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.JOSEKUTTY MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): --------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM. MS.K.R.DEEPA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.7743 of 2010 (P) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 17th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioners are decree holders in E.P.No.42/2003 in L.A.R.No.64/1986 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Kottayam. Prayer sought in this writ petition is to direct the Sub Court to hear and decide the dispute upon statement of account filed by the parties. 2. Pursuant to the directions of this Court, a report has been obtained from the Sub Court. From the report it is seen that as per the statement filed by the judgment debtor, the balance amount due is Rs.3,98,381.18, and as per the statement filed by the 4th decree holder, the balance amount due is Rs.72,67,922/-. It is stated that in view of the disparity in the amount shown in the statements, the case was taken up for hearing on 08/03/2010, and at the request of the judgment debtor, the case now stands posted to 09/06/2010. It is also reported that the matter is likely to be listed before the Lok Adalat, which is scheduled to be held on WP(C) No.7743/2010 -2- 27/03/2010, and that if the issue is not settled, the case will be heard on 09/06/2010. From this report thus received from the Sub Court, I am satisfied that there is no delay or latches caused by the Court and the matter is engaging the attention of the Sub Court. In such circumstances, I decline to pass any further direction in the matter. The writ petition is accordingly closed. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg