IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No. 219 OF 2009 Raju Bhavarilal Panchariya ..Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Mr Subhash W. Baviskar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr K. V. Saste, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND A.R. JOSHI,JJ. A.R. JOSHI,JJ. A.R. JOSHI,JJ. DATED : 26TH FEBRUARY,2009. DATED : 26TH FEBRUARY,2009. DATED : 26TH FEBRUARY,2009. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. The Petitioner has made the following prayers in his writ petition:- (1) A Rule is issued. (2) By issuing an appropriate writ, order or Direction under Article 226, 227 of Constitution of India and under Sec. 482 of Cr.P.C. take cognizance of all above white collared crime offenders due to violation of by their offences violated right in rem. Right in personum of applicant and also violated constitutional right Art. 14, 15 (1), 17. Also violated fundamental right of applicant, Art. 20 (1), 21, 22(1), 23(1) of the Constitution of India and terminated their services being public servant. (3) By issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction under Articles 226, 227 of Constitution of India and under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. Take cognizance of all above white collared crime offenders u/s 34, 113 to 120 and 121 A, 166, 167, 327, 328, 477, 503, of I.P.C. and terminated their services being public servant. (4) Give direction to CBI for proper investigation in this case and send this case for proper investigation to CBI only because in this case, Addl. Police Commissioner Rajendra Sonavane is involved with white collar crime offenders and he was chief of CID Department in Pune. Hence nobody is co-operating to the Applicant at any police station including Police Commissioner Office Pune. Applicant made various complaints to Police Commissioner and Competent Govt. authorities but they failed to take cognizance of offence against these white collar crime offenders. (5) Applicant craves leave to alter, adduce any evidence in this writ petition at any time. (6) Any equitable order in the interest of justice be passed. 2. We are afraid that such prayers cannot be granted. It is a general petition. No specific acts have been attributed to any of the specific Respondents. If the Petitioner has grievance of any kind he can move the police concerned with the specific allegations or go before the appropriate Magistrate with a complaint. With these observations petition is disposed of. (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (BILAL NAZKI,J.) (BILAL NAZKI,J.) (BILAL NAZKI,J.)