IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR i W Em sm APPLICANT Dr. Rajendra Prasad Shukla S/o w“ Late shri Rampal Shukla, aged ((93% M REVIEW PETITION NO. /2009 B . c WV §um about 43 years, ChiefExecutive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Pathalgaon, District Jashpur (c.G.) Presently R/o Village Dhakhara, Post Deogaon, tahsil raipur Karkarchuliyan District Rewa (Mt?) (Presently posted as Assistant Project officer, Jila Panchayat Bastar, Jagdalpur C.G.) (Respondent) VERSUS NON APPLICANTS l State of Chhattisgarh, Through (Mm " the Secretary Government of Chhattisgarh, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhjawan, Mantralaya, Raipur C.G. ,2. The Secretary Government of Chhattisgarh, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur C.G. f6“ The Collector, District Jashpur C.G. (Appellants) N“ REVIEW PETITION UNDER RULE 9O OF THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH RULES, 2007 READ WITH ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL POCEDURE, 1908 M R “7 “m2m“ W ‘ ‘ W; TWTIW , , eu {9’ W1 2am 3mm W25." (Ww i: W aw ~n/w REWEW WETETR W m-wm*MEEER Cd a; NHM MmNmE mm: wwEEv WWW mm’BLE $HR§ $UN§L KLJMAR $5 2L3“ 03 2W3 The petii‘wner has Wed this dated 29.07.2008 paSSed in WA. {he said order paased by this Caun Leave Pemiom (CNN N0209Q6i08) W223 Ward on 05.0Q2008 am dismigséng the Speciai Leave Pam}: ‘We find mad the Mg; order of revocatian of suspe given by the Panchayat Raj The effem 0f the arder of th the: hegchptiah in the $ihg¥& Deparimem is the parent therefore, fmd that the orde tha petmoher. The speeiaé L m View 0f ihe fem that the the Greer daied 29.07.2908 p335 Cam has eh'eady beeh dismiesed ‘ Pemicah deeeh/eis t0 be and ie here' Sd/— Chief Justice Wheem N NGJ M2009 l ; petition for review of khe orcéer No.313/2007‘ Admittediy, against . the petitianer had filed a Speciai heme the Supieme Ceuit which foiiowihg orciers were paseeci )f‘il i Caurt has noi interfered with the sion. T'he'posting 0f the petitioner Depar‘imehi is .ieo he? ihieriei'eci. i, Divieion Behch ie cmiy m delete Judge‘s order that Penchayai Raj epar‘imehi of the peiitioher. We, deee not cauee any prejudiee to eve petition i3 Uiismiseed." peciai Leave Petiiicm ‘iiied ageihsi; d by the Division Bench oi ihis 3y the $upreme Cami, ihe Review y diemieeed. 5di— nha Sunii Kuma' Si Judge