IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No.7085 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.10.2010 Harjit Kaur and others. ....... Petitioners. Versus Arun Kumar and another. ....... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present:Shri Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners. .... Mahesh Grover,J. The petitioners are aggrieved by order dated 26.8.2010 by which their objections have been dismissed for want of any evidence to support them. A perusal of the impugned order reveals that the execution was preferred by the respondents in the year 2005. The petitioners filed their objections in the year 2006 and for four years, they did not even bother to examine any one of them or to produce any material in support thereof. The Executing Court thereafter passed the impugned order dismissing the objections and issued warrants of sale. Counsel for the petitioners states that the impugned order is unsustainable in the eyes of law. He further contends that the petitioners have already paid the requisite amount to the respondents and, therefore, the warrants of sale, if executed, is likely to prejudice their case. C.R. No.7085 of 2010 (O&M) -2- .... After hearing the counsel for the petitioners, I am of the opinion that there is no legal infirmity in the impugned order so as to warrant any interference by this Court in the revisional jurisdiction. The petitioners,who had set up a plea that they had paid the requisite amount, ought to have brought sufficient material on record to prove that fact. Having failed to do so for the last four years, they cannot claim any perversity or legal infirmity in the impugned order. There is, thus, no ground to interfere. Dismissed. October 28,2010 ( Mahesh Grover ) “SCM” Judge