HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISLON BENCH ^ CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. & HON'BLE SHRI SUNSL KUMAR SINHA, J. JVIisc. Appeal (C) PR No. 2538 of 2007 ^ IP^-; 64-1 /<p6 APPELLANTS 1. Umraopur Goswami, son of Shri (CLAIMANTS) Purigiri Goswami, aged about 70 years. 2. Smt. Kachri Bai Goswami, wife of Umraopuri Goswami, aged about 65 years. 3. Smt. Leelabai Goswami, wife of Late RoshanpuriGoswami, aged about 33 years. 4. Narayanpuri Goswami, son of Late Roshanpuri Goswami, aged about 18 years. 5. Narendrapuri Goswami, son of Late Roshanpuri Goswami, aged about 15 years. 6. Chandrapuri Goswami, son of Late Roshanpuri Goswami, aged about 10 years. 7. Bhesajpuri Goswami, son of Late Roshanpuri Goswami, aged about 9 years. No. 5 to 7 are minors through their natural , guardian mother Smt. Leelabai Goswami. All residents of Village Kanokot, P.0. Kanokot, P.S. Utai, Tehsil Patan, District Durg (C.G.) RESPONDENTS Versus 1. Majnu Mahanand, son of PLitewasa, aged about _ years, resident of Raipur Naka, Near Shiv Mandir, BIBHUTI PRASAD Digitally signed by BIBHUTI PRASAD Date: 2025.02.04 11:08:15 +0530 /zt/\ Udiya Mohaila, ,Durg P.S. Mohan Nagar, Durg, Tehsil & District Durg. 2. Nandkumar Chandrakar, son of Kishan Chandrakar, aged about years, residentof Block-B-18, Vidyut Nagar, Durg, TehsiS & District Durg. IViiscellaneous appeaS under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act. 1988 Present: None for the appellants. ORDER (5th IVSay, 20Q8) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appeilants. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Chief Justice nimmi Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge