RSA No. 68 of 2007. 10.01.2008 Present: Mr. V.P. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been brought by the appellants against the judgment and decree dated 23rd October, 2006 passed by the learned Additional District Judge (I), Kangra at Dharamshala in Civil Appeal No.63-P/04. Vide this judgment and decree the learned lower appellate Court while dismissing the Regular First Appeal filed by the appellants, upheld the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court on 6th July, 2004 whereby the learned trial Court had decreed the suit filed by the plaintiff/respondent. Both the Courts below have concurrently held against the appellants. The respondent/plaintiff had conclusively proved that she alongwith others was the co-owner of the property in question and the appellants/defendants had dispossessed her illegally. The appellants/ defendants did not have anything to do with the property and were rank trespassers. The appellants had set up a case of adverse possession which both the Courts below totally disbelieved in the absence of any cogent and plausible evidence. No question of law muchless any substantial question of law arises for consideration in this appeal, which is hereby dismissed. CMPs No.100, 265, 266 of 2007 and 35 of 2008. In view of the dismissal of the appeal all these applications are also dismissed. January 10, 2008. (V.K. Gupta), C.J. (rc)