IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4905 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 16th August, 2011 Sushma and another … Petitioners Versus Kashmir Singh and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Krishan Sehajpal, Advocate for the petitioners. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying that order (Annexure P-3) dated 26th March, 2011 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalandhar in Civil Suit No.280/10 titled as ‘Kashmir Singh v. Umesh Parbhakar and others’, wherein the petitioners have been ordered to be impleaded as defendants No.3 and 4 to the suit, be set aside. Mr. Krishan Sehajpal, Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners, has not been able to dispute the findings returned in the impugned order (Annexure P-3) that on the date when petitioners purchased the property the suit was already pending. Learned counsel has stated that on the date when property was purchased it was not in their knowledge and thus, they are the bonafide purchasers. Be that as it may, by accepting the application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC and by impleading the petitioners as defendants to the suit, the Court below has only made an attempt to ward-off future Civil Revision No.4905 of 2011 (O&M) complications, which may arise and jeopardize the interests of the petitioners. The petitioners will be well within their rights to approach the trial Court to say that they are the bonafide purchasers. Taking totality of circumstances into consideration, it cannot be said that the impugned order (Annexure P-3) will prejudice any rights of the petitioners. Hence, no interference is warranted in the present revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE August 16, 2011 rps 2