Civil Revision No. 1198 of 2010 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1198 of 2010 Date of decision: 23.4.2010 Ashok Kumar and others ...Petitioners Versus Naresh Kumar ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr.Namit Gautam, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.K.Bawa, Advocate for the respondent S.D.ANAND, J. The grievance of the petitioners, in the course of the petition, is with regard to the lackadaisical manner at which the trial in the personal necessity-based petition is proceeding in the Court at Ludhiana. The averment that the adjournments have been granted in that case on the virtual drop of a hat is borne out by a perusal of various interim orders which stand quoted in the petition itself. The case is presently fixed for 25.5.2010 for evidence of the petitioner. The learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, assures that the petitioner's evidence shall be concluded on that date itself. The respondent shall conclude their evidence by 14.6.2010. The learned Trial Court shall, thereafter, dispose of the main petition itself by or on 31.7.2010. The disposal of this petition in limine proceeds on an Civil Revision No. 1198 of 2010 -2- **** assumption that there is no factual inaccuracy in the averment on behalf of the petitioner. If it transpires, at any subsequent point of time, that this order had been obtained on the basis of any incorrect averment, it (order of this Court) would be liable to be reviewed. The acknowledgment (of a copy of this order) issued by the concerned Judicial Officer shall be forwarded to the Registry of this Court. Learned Sessions Judge shall himself maintain a tab to ensure that the case is disposed of by afore-mentioned date. Disposed of accordingly. April 23, 2010 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge