1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11174 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION ST.NO.21231 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 21 OF 1993 Gulab Giraju Kedari (deceased) through his L.Rs. Applicants Versus Gokul Shankar Kedari (deceased) through his L.Rs. & others Respondents Mr.Anoop Patil, advocate holding for Mr.R.N.Dhorde, advocate for applicants. Smt.Asha D.Rakh, advocate for Respondents No.1A to 1E. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 21st August, 2009. P.C.: These are applications seeking condonation of delay of 4906 days occurred in presenting application for bringing on record L.Rs. Of deceased Respondent No.1 i.e. Respondents No.1A to 1E and for incorporating their names as L.Rs. Of deceased Respondent No.1. Heard Mr.Anoop Patil, learned Counsel holding for Mr.R.N.Dhorde, advocate for applicants and Smt.Asha D.Rakh, learned Counsel for Respondents No.1A to 1E. Considering contentions raised in the applications, applications deserves to be allowed. However, looking to the fact that there is enormous delay in approaching the Court, applicants are put to terms in respect of payment of cost. 2 Applications are thus allowed. Delay of 4906 days occurred in presenting application for bringing on record L.Rs. Of deceased Respondent No.1 is condoned subject to payment of cost of Rs.2000/-to the High Court Bar Association Library, Aurangabad. The amount of cost to be deposited within four weeks from today. L.Rs. Of deceased Respondent No.1 are permitted to be brought on record, subject to payment of cost, as directed. In the event of failure to deposit the amount of cost, as directed, Civil Applications shall be deemed to have been rejected. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/ca1117408 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11173 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION ST.NO.21235 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 21 OF 1993 Gulab Giraju Kedari (deceased) through his L.Rs. Applicants Versus Gokul Shankar Kedari & others Respondents Mr.Anoop Patil, advocate holding for Mr.R.N.Dhorde, advocate for applicants. Smt.Asha D.Rakh, advocate for Respondents No.1. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 21st August, 2009. P.C.: These are applications seeking condonation of delay of 3367 days occurred in presenting application for bringing on record L.Rs. Of deceased appellant no.2 i.e. Applicants no.2A to 2C and for incorporating their names as L.Rs. Of deceased appellant no.2. Heard Mr.Anoop Patil, learned Counsel holding for Mr.R.N.Dhorde, advocate for applicants and Smt.Asha D.Rakh, learned Counsel for Respondent No.1. Considering contentions raised in the applications, applications deserves to be allowed. However, looking to the fact that there is enormous delay in approaching the Court, applicants are put to terms in respect of payment of cost. 4 Applications are thus allowed. Delay of 3367 days occurred in presenting application for bringing on record L.Rs. Of deceased appellant no.2 is condoned subject to payment of cost of Rs.2000/-to the High Court Bar Association Library, Aurangabad. The amount of cost to be deposited within four weeks from today. L.Rs. Of deceased appellant no.2 i.e. Applicants no.2A to 2C are permitted to be brought on record, subject to payment of cost, as directed. In the event of failure to deposit the amount of cost, as directed, Civil Applications shall be deemed to have been rejected. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/ca1117308