1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 3926 OF 2010. Ku. Kunda Murlidhar Shende and others. -: VERSUS :- The State of Maharashtra and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : AUGUST 23, 2010. Heard Shri S.R. Deshpande, learned Counsel for Petitioners and Shri Thakre, learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1,4 and 5. Learned Counsel for petitioner insists that Writ Petition should be allowed today and fresh elections should be ordered. Learned A.G.P. is opposing this request. As per settled law it is clear that merely because petitioners are employees of private school, the nomination papers could not have been rejected. However, now the elections are already over and in such circumstances, the petitioners have to file election petition. Shri Deshpande, 2 learned counsel is disputing this position. However, in writ jurisdiction, in election process there cannot be any interference. If the petitioners file Election Petition the same shall be disposed of by the concerned Court as early as possible and in any case within a period of three months from the date of its filing. Writ Petition is disposed of with above observations. No costs. Needless to mention that all contentions of petitioners are kept open. JUDGE Rgd.