In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh CWP No. 16368 of 2006 Date of Decision: October 13, 2006 Ram Narayan Yadav …Petitioners Versus The Haryana Vidhan Sabha Secretariat & others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI PRESENT: Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Jaskirat Singh Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. JUDGMENT M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral) The grievance made by the petitioner is that the Enquiry Officer - respondent No. 3 is likely to be biased against the petitioner apart from others things and for that purpose the petitioner has already made a representation to the Appointing Authority i.e. Worthy Speaker, Haryana Vidhan Sabha, Chandigarh, on 5.10.2006 (P-6). Without going into the merit of the controversy raised in the instant petition at this stage we deem it just and appropriate to direct the Worthy Speaker to look into the representation made by the petitioner and take a decision thereon expeditiously preferably within a period of two weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. It shall be appreciated if a speaking order is passed while disposing of the representation made by the petitioner. Copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (M.M.S. BEDI) CWP No. 16290 of 2006 October 13, 2006 JUDGE Pkapoor 2