- 1 - 18.sj.442.10 ss.2468.10 skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 442 OF 2010 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2468 OF 2010 Shailesh Asalraj Jain ..Plaintiff -Versus- Maneklal V. Jewels & Anr. ..Defendants .......... Ms. Nita Solanki i/b Kiran Jain & Co. for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. .......... CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 2ND DECEMBER 2011. P.C. 1 The suit is filed to recover the price of goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendants under the terms and conditions contained in an invoice. The invoice stipulates the rate of interest at the rate of 24% per annum. A cheque issued towards part payment by the defendants was dishonoured. The defendants are absent. The defendants have not replied to the plaintiff’s advocates’ notice demanding payment. 2 The defendants have not filed an appearance. A compilation of documents is tendered by the plaintiff in Court, is taken on record and marked “A” collectively. - 2 - 18.sj.442.10 ss.2468.10 3 There is nothing on record that militates against the plaintiff’s claim. This is a fit case to accept the averments and submissions in the plaint as correct. 4 In the circumstances, the summons for judgment is made absolute and the suit is decreed as prayed. However, the interest after the date of the suit shall be at 12% per annum. Costs to be quantified as per Rules. Refund of court fee, if any, as per Rules. -