IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 4TH MAY 2010 / 14TH VAISAKHA 1932 WA.No. 765 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.10075/2010 Dated 25/03/2010 .................... APPELLANT(S): /PETITIONER -------------- N.PRAKASH, S/O.A.NARAYANA RAO AGED 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT PRAJITH VIHAR AYINI NADA ROAD, MARADU PO, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.N.PRAKASH (PARTY-IN-PERSON) RESPONDENT(S): /RESPONDENT --------------- THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ---------------------------------- W.A. No.765 of 2010 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 4th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T Antony Dominic, J. When the writ appeal came up for consideration, having regard to the fact that the appellant has already moved an I.A. in WP(C) No.24333/2009, all that the appellant sought is a clarification that the said I.A. should be considered untrammeled by the observations made in the impugned judgment. 2. From the penultimate paragraph of the impugned judgment itself, we find that the learned Judge has given such a clarification. In view of this, we do not find any necessity for a further clarification. Therefore, this writ appeal is only to be dismissed and we do so. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) (C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE) jg