1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUD ICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPR) NO.50/2010 Singh Firm House through its Proprietor and another ...Versus... Dhanraj Suryabhan Dangre ................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................ [None for the applicants.] [Ms. S.T.Godbole, Adv. for respondent] CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 22.03.2010 None present for the applicants. Ms. S.T. Godbole, learned Advocate appears for the respondent. The appellate judgment is dated 23/4/2009 and the present revision application has been filed on 18/2/2010. I have gone through the application for condonation of delay in filing the criminal revision application. The delay has not been explained with proper reasons nor the reasons furnished in para 3 of the application, are at all satisfactory. It appears that application for certified copy was made on 22/7/2009 and was received by the applicant on 05/8/2009, though the same was ready on 03/8/2009. There is absolutely no explanation for the period from 03/8/2009 till filing of revision application. In the result, I find no merit in the application for codonation of delay, which is not properly explained and no details have been furnished 2 regarding certified copy etc. Therefore, the criminal application for condonation of delay is dismissed. Consequently, the revision application is also dismissed. The amount of Rs.50,000/- deposited in this Court by the applicant, as shown in the office note date dated 19/3/2010, shall be allowed to be withdrawn by the non-applicant/respondent. JUDGE Diwale