1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 352/2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3541/2007 (Nilesh s/o Balwant Ukunde vs. State and others) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : APRIL 21, 2008 Heard Shri Mardikar, learned Counsel for the applicant/petitioner. We have considered the contentions of the learned Counsel for the applicant/petitioner and perused the impugned order dated 12.2.2008. Perusal of the impugned order shows that since period of one year of respondent no.3 as Fire Consultant was coming to an end, this Court did not show any indulgence. Similarly, it is observed in the impugned order that after one year's period of appointment of respondent no.3 will be over, respondent no.2 Corporation shall undertake the procedure mentioned in the order 2 itself. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for showing indulgence. The review petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE khj