1 13-cas-1150-2010.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION srj CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1150 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.98 OF 1990 Shri Ramrao G. Nanekar .. Applicant. V/s. Shri Kashinath B. Ukirade (since deceased) through his Legal Heirs & Others .. Respondents. Mr. K. S. Patil, for the Applicant. Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar, for Respondent Nos.1A to 1G. CORAM : G.S.GODBOLE, J. DATE : 8th SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C.: 1 Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. 2 Notices issued to Respondent No.1H and 1I are awaited. The learned Advocate for the Applicant has pointed out that Respondent No.1A is the duly Constituted Attorney of the other Respondents including Respondent Nos.1H and 1I, pursuant to the Power of Attorney dated 23rd 2 13-cas-1150-2010.sxw June, 2008. Perused the Power of Attorney and clauses 11 and 12 support the submission made by the learned Advocate for the Applicant. The learned Advocate for the Applicant further pointed out that Respondent No. 1A has in fact, filed R.D. No. 27 of 2008 in the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ghodnadi on 10th October, 2008 as Constituted Attorney of the other heirs of deceased Kashinath B. Ukirde . 3 In view of this, it is not necessary to await service of formal service of notice on Respondent Nos.1H and 1I who are already represented by Respondent Nos.1A. 4 The reasons given in paragraphs 4 and 6 of the Civil Application deserve to be accepted and a case is made out for condonation of delay. 5 Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (c). (G.S.GODBOLE, J.)