:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION (L) NO.112 OF 2006 IN COMPANY APPLICATION NO.25 OF 1988 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.334 OF 1997 Dr.A.C.Muthiah ..Applicant. (Orig. Respdt. No.12) Vs. The Official Liquidator and Liquidator of M/s.Enamelled Wires Ltd. (in liqn.) ..Respondent (Orig.Applicant) Mr.D.D.Madon, Senior Counsel with Mr.Z.Andhyarujina i/b.M/s.Gagrats for the Applicant. Ms.Gautam, Dy. Official Liquidator present. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 27TH JANUARY, 2006 DATED : 27TH JANUARY, 2006 DATED : 27TH JANUARY, 2006 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : By consent, the Application is taken on board and heard finally. 2. The order dated 28.4.2005 proceeded on the basis that Respondent No.12 therein i.e. the Applicant in the present Company Application had not filed an affidavit in reply, whereas, in fact, an affidavit in reply was filed. Further, the cause list of 28.4.2005 did not mention the name of the Applicant and the Advocates. It did not even mention the name :2: of the company. 3. In the circumstances, ad-interim order in terms of prayer (b).