»!ingi IN THE HON'BLE,HI6H COURT OF CHHAm:SGARH_AT BILASPUB. z'ni^-f-y Eefttrofi TT n^ / ^^•^•^ ^y^-^\\ •«• ^".^A S&--""\C • Contemnors Versus years, S/o Late Shri P.R.Singh, Sub Divisionai Officer of Police, Bhatapara, Distt. Raipur-(C.6.) N.K.Aswal le D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur- f<s4ie^oi /n -.fcy. fi. .to.. Superintendent of Police, Sub bsvisionai Officer of Po!ice, -i - Si working (illegcily) at <i' Bhatapara, [)istt. Raipur-(C.6.5 l':l;i' ^ CONTEMPT PETCnON UNDER SECTCON 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTTON OF IN&IA ^' T 78 an^?t ^l ((;-<1'* ^n sn^r^ihi' )i r'l J J_ ^y -s-sf •^fpTR.'H, •®TTtaT^,ferrey STI^?I 'raq; (^?f3<^i) T~ yCTTWBfSCT an^'.'i FSB : Hon'ble Shri Bfianindrd 18.8.2011 Shri A.S. Rajput, courtsel for fhe petitloner. Heard on admission. This petition has beei) disobedience of the order W.P. (S)No.3526/11. s4 filed by the petitioner alleging wiUful d^ted 4.7.2011 passed by fhis CoLut in 4.7.2011, an interim order to the eflect that status c petitioner was working. 2.7.2011 (Annexure C-4) wi Police, Raipur, on 5al Ji.ily qiNwN •w?S ^ fss'S -fs^v. ^flRftran^i Moban Shrivastava, J.1 Leamed counsel fot the petitioner submits that on \was passed in favour of the petitioner luo witfa regard to placement of the petltioner, as obtains on fljiat date, shall be maintained, till fhe next date of hearing. Leam|ed counsel for fhe petitioner submits that in fact tfae date on wh^ch the tntertm order was passed, the He submits that back-dated order JLS passed by the Sr. Superintendent of i, 2011. He further submits that fhe petitioner had dischai^ed i|luties of his ofilce on 4th July, 2011 and also sent a memo to the Sr. Superintendent of Police on 4ta July, 2011 informing that hje has submitted reply tn a case before the High Court on 30th A^ril, 2011. He also placed on record certain other communications raade by the petitioner to j .--a. .- .-._..; 7 .^ -^- ^^as^^ -+ ^^ M-HC—78 7Sf -<fl<1IC1'1, ®tl1<4'l<o,fawi-Hy *11*«tT9»qrai •TRT.200 sf^i xf^! (1pf3^tt) 311^'i^rf^iw 'iwi sn^i giiiNr Eraveen TOTOT ^Elfer 311^1 »--2.. fhe Govemment and also to 4<h jLdy 2011 and on 5tb July, Annexure C-4, which I: petitioner hunsetf, show^ that dated 2.7.2011, by which the aftemoon of 2nd July, 2011. particularly that fhe writ pel before the Court, I am no1 respondents at this stage. t|he Sr. Superintendent of Police on |2011 respectively. [8LS been placed on record by fhe |an order has been passed which is petitioner has been relieved in fhe In fhat view of fhe matter and jition is still pending consideration inclined to proceed against the The petition is (heretbr^ liberty to the petitioner to pending writ petltion. qii^<n<i1i iti^lyiY ^ fsl^t Tf^$R iisiRrqsn^i finally disposed of, however, wifh ir|ove appropriate application in the Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge 1