8.5.2007. Present: Mr. D.Dadhwal, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.Surinder Sharma, Advocate for Respondents No.1 and 4. Mr.C.B.Singh, Dy.Advocate General for Respondents No.2 and 3. Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General for respondent No.5. CWP.No.172/2005. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he had inter alia raised various grounds in his review petition which have been summarily dismissed by the appropriate authority in exercise of its powers under Section 94(1) F of Electricity Act by a non-speaking order and the contentions raised have not been considered by the authority. Question touching the jurisdiction of the authorities has been raised by him. Perusal of the record including the order is also indicative of the same. In this view of the matter, the order dated 16th November, 2004 (Anneuxre:P-12) is set aside. The reviewing authority is directed to consider the application of review filed by the petitioner afresh and after affording an opportunity to the petitioner pass a reasoned order within a period of eight weeks from today. Mr. Dadhwal submits that he may be permitted to raise an additional plea to the effect that he has now again taken over the charge as Secretary of the Electricity Regulatory Commission. It will be open for him to take all permissible pleas in accordance with law . The authority shall decide the matter within a period of four weeks from today. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (Sanjay Karol),J. May 8, 2007(R)