IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 28TH JUNE 2011 / 7TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 16048 of 2011(E) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ C.PREETHA, AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, TRICHUR DISTRICT, (CHANDRAKANDAM, PADA VADAKKU, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM). BY ADV. SRI.K.KARTHIKEYA PANICKER SMT.DAYA K. PANICKER RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, DIRECTORATE OF AGRICULTURE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. CAROLINE, AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, CHAVARA, KOLLAM-691 585. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SANDESH RAJA R2 BY ADV.SRI.K.T.SHYAM KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/06/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.16048/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 18/1/2011 P2 COPY OF THE LIST OF AGRICULTURAL OFFICER WHO HAVE APPLIED FOR GENERAL TRANSFER 2011. P3 COPY OF THE ORDER NO.SD(3)5000/2011 DATED 9/5/2011 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT. P4 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 11/5/2011 BEFORE THE RESPONDENT. P5 COPY OF THE ORDER NO.SD(3)5000/2011 DATED 15/5/2011 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT. P6 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 17/5/2011 IN WP(C)NO.13578/2011. P7 COPY OF THE ORDER NO.SD(3)20344/2011 DATED 27/05/2011 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT. P8 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 29/5/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 16048 of 2011 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 28th day of June, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext. P7 order, whereby the petitioner has been transferred to Thrissur for implementation of the interim order in W.P(C) No. 13775/2011. The petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if the petitioner is granted accommodation in a convenient station without disturbing the petitioner in W.P(C) No. 13775/2011. The petitioner has filed Ext. P8 representation before the 1st respondent. The petitioner now confines her relief for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P8 on the question of accommodating the petitioner to some other convenient place. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider Ext. P8 to see whether the petitioner can be accommodated in some other convenient place other than the place to which the 2nd respondent has been posted, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/