’ a wgzwqkég _ 'awtcael 3a mama ‘ mW (5.6L) Cr.M.P. No. i 5K7 2008 3.3. 1. W W, an. EL W : @mgk @wmg? W, FE 42 ENC, 2_ Wmww,wzom§ w m W, W W aw W _ Tm WW m—W, W W WWEFT. "Wwmmur EM Wwfiman.m1%mw WAT, w 33 am‘ W —’ um WW WWW, ma WWWEW. / Wwmmwziwt 'wramu m W m w: W2: WEwrmaawwmW W W) Em m War MM 1o4/oi/Wwmmqétwmm mwW$WWW2m§ zoos$maftaiwmmwaa WWWW$WW Wméloamwwmlw Wam$wWW2msoa§ %L WW&W@%WWWWW §;_ am? @eO’F-tr IQH COURTS“ ¢HHATTIS6ARH AT EILA$?UR nagle Banch Hom’bEe Mr Jugftce ?r‘umker Dgwakgr CR M ? NQ 335 a? mag A PLICANT5 Guiam Mohammad and {mower ‘ i Varsus _ f T ‘ 1 1 i I ‘ § APPLIé'ANT Rajemdr‘a Kumar' M§$hw N Shri Shashi Ku‘mar Kusfriwaha, caunsei fan" The pe‘rifianers. § PETITEGN uNDER SEQ-ION 482 OF mt CODE OF 1 CRIMINAL PROCEbuszg ORDER (98.01.2010) ‘ Heard on admission Presam‘ peh‘hcn is directed oamm‘r Hie Impugned order dafed 2?3?068 passed by HM? Add! Sessmns Judge Manmdmaar‘h Dlsfmcf Korea in criminal rewswn No 104/2006 whereby !ecxr'ned Addn‘lonai Sessmrw Judge has afflrmed The order dm‘ed 275ZO06 passed by igarnea Sub Dmswna! Magxsfm‘re, Manendmgqr'h, Das‘halm‘ Korea, 2.‘ IT appears from ’rhe order impugned ThaT on The basm 0‘ comimn’r made bv The non apphcan’r under Sechon 133 of ‘The‘ Ccde 0f Cmmmcd Precedure an order was gassed by learned aoiisfr‘afe for removmg Thp Mega! cansfruc‘i'mn made by ‘rhe pah‘rsoners on fhe road Tms order was passed oy The iearnedt ‘ agts’rra‘re affer recordxno the stafemenf of The par‘nes and COHecTma evxdence TT 1s ciear‘ from The record that The reporf o‘ concerned oohce sfcmon was a!so conSidered bv The !earned Sub Dwlswnal Mamsfrafe before passmo of fhe order for removal of The Mega! consfruc‘non. ‘ IH s ‘ p M § M _ ; 7 . A In fhe revision The 'revisiem! Ccuw’r has censidered CG! Th aspec’rs of fhe case and has mammmed Th? order passed by Sub Dwlsmna! Magistra’rg Manenmgar Learned counsel for fhe pg’rmaner‘s informs that despif ord§en of The Magisa‘r‘a’re, ‘rhe Mea! cons‘rmc‘rion has not been 4 x E g i _ Wefnaved t!” date. 1 do not ‘find any ground to interfere wit the concurrent fmdlns of the courts below as according to me there Is no Megallty or perversxtv 1n the some mn The petition faiis and is accordingiy dismissed at'the otio ste itsel. " Sd/- x kel“ D‘wa Judge ' e ’ dh a t h g ? ‘ ‘ \wmn kfi, f ‘i V hg f