:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION NO.1 OF 2008 PETITION NO.1 OF 2008 PETITION NO.1 OF 2008 IN IN IN CONTEMPT CONTEMPT CONTEMPT PETITION NO.22 OF 1997 PETITION NO.22 OF 1997 PETITION NO.22 OF 1997 IN IN IN TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.78 OF 1994 SUIT NO.78 OF 1994 SUIT NO.78 OF 1994 IN IN IN TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.156 OF 1994 PETITION NO.156 OF 1994 PETITION NO.156 OF 1994 Feroze Homi Duggan & Anr. ..Petitioners Vs. Jean Nusly Duggan & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.Shailesh Shah i/b.M/s.Solomon & Co. for the Petitioners. None for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.Zubin Behramkamdin i/b. Bharucha & Partner for Respondent No.4. Mr.Z.Andhyarujina for Respondent No.5. A.A.Nabar i/b. Hariani & Co. for Respondent No.6. Mrs.Rashna Khan i/b. Mulla & Mulla for Respondent No.7. Mr.Shaukat Merchant with U.Tapos with Nikita Kadam i/b. M.M.Legal Venture for Respondent No.9. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, S.J.KATHAWALLA, S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 28TH JULY, 2008 : 28TH JULY, 2008 : 28TH JULY, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. We have perused our order dated 24th March,2008. In paragraph No.3, there is an error, in the sense what we had intended was, that the Contempt Petition along with Chamber Summons should be heard after the disposal of the above suits. In view thereof, the words "all other Testamentary Petitions" occurring in the last sentence of paragraph No.3 shall stand deleted. In view thereof, that sentence should read as under: :2: "The Contempt Petition along with Notice of Motions and Chamber Summons will be heard after the disposal of the above two suits." 2. It is made clear that the Testamentary Petition No.156 of 1994 which is now numbered as Suit No.78 of 1994 can be proceeded with for final hearing. Review Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)