1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4722 OF 2011 Union of India through General Manager, Bilaspur and anr. ..vs.. Jagram Meena =-=-==-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. R.G.Agrawal, Adv. for the petitioners. C ORAM : D.D.SINHA AND A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : 9th NOVEMBER, 2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. The writ petition is directed against the order dated 14/2/2011 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bombay, whereby the order dated 26/10/2010 passed by the petitioner came to be set aside. The following facts are not in dispute. That at the time of passing the order dated 26/10/2010 of proposed termination of the respondent, departmental enquiry proceedings were going on and final decision on the basis of the report of the enquiry officer had not taken hence Tribunal has quashed and set aside the order dated 26/10/2010 passed by the 2 petitioner. On the backdrop of the above referred facts, the findings recorded by the Tribunal are sustainable since petitioner could not have passed the order dated 26/10/2010 whereby the termination of the respondent was proposed without taking the final decision in the departmental enquiry. In that view of the matter, there is no case made out for showing indulgence. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE. chute