IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 16693 of 2009. [O&M] Date of Decision: 12th August 2010. Smt. Jagir Kaur Petitioner through Ms. Jagdeep Bains, Advocate Versus The Ludhiana Town Improvement Trust & Anr. Respondents through Mr. P.C.Goel, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner purchased Plot No. 7-A, Bhai Randhir Singh Nagar, Adarsh Colony, Ludhiana in the year 1994 from its original allottee, namely, Smt. Indu Bala wife of Shri Sham Arya. The original allottee was issued a No Dues Certificate and thereafter only the plot was transferred in the name of the petitioner. She has now been served with a demand notice which includes certain dues recoverable from the original allottee also for the period ranging from 1986 onwards. Aggrieved, the petitioner approached this Court by way of CWP No. 13290 of 2009 which was disposed of with a direction to the Improvement Trust, Ludhiana to pass a speaking order explaining the demand raised against the petitioner. The Improvement Trust, Ludhiana has thereafter sent Memo dated 13.10.2009 [Annexure P-15] giving brief description of the total amount of Rs. 2,64,856/- being demanded from the petitioner, giving rise to this writ petition. Learned counsel for the respondent–Trust states that the afore-stated order may not be treated as a speaking order and in fact is a mere notice inviting objections from the petitioner. He submits that a speaking order shall be passed after considering the objections that may be raised by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already submitted her objections. Be that as it may, the petitioner shall be at liberty to supplement the objections, if so advised, within a period of two weeks. Thereafter, the Improvement Trust, Ludhiana shall pass a speaking order explaining and justifying the demand raised against the petitioner. If the petitioner is still dis- satisfied, she shall be at liberty to impugn the said order before an appropriate Forum. No payment shall be insisted from the petitioner till the final speaking order is passed. Disposed of. Dasti. August 12, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE