IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN TUESDAY, THE 4TH AUGUST 2009 / 13TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 21779 of 2009(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- DR.NISHAD KOYA.A., AGED 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT NAUFAL MANZIL, NEAR ARCH BISHOP'S PALACE, CHANGANACHERRY VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY PO. BY ADV. SRI.P.A.MOHAMMED SHAH SRI.P.H.SHAJAHAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOTTAYAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THRIKKODITHANAM POLICE STATION, THRIKKODITHANAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 3. NAVOORAMMA, W/O.IBRAHIM, RAWTHER, PUTHUPPARAMBIL HOUSE, PERUMBANACHI P.O., CHANGANACHERRY TALUK. 4. BASHEER, S/O.IBRAHIM RAWTHER, PUTHUPPARAMBIL HOUSE, PERUMBANACHI P.O., CHANGANACHERRY TALUK. 5. MOHAMMED SALIH MUBARAK, PUTHUPPARAMBIL HOUSE, PERUMBANACHI P.O., CHANGANACHERRY TALUK. 6. NAVAS, PUTHUPPARAMBIL HOUSE, PARUMBANACHI P.O., MADAPPALLY VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK. 7. P.E.NAZIR PUTHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, PERUMBANACHI P.O., CHANGANACHERRY TALUK. 8. GEORGE, NEDIYAKALAPPARAMBIL HOUSE, PERUMPANACHI P.O., MADAPPALLY VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK. 9. THOMAS CHACKO, PULIMOOTTIL HOUSE, PERUMBANACHI P.O., MADAPPALLY VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.A.SALIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & P.BHAVADASAN, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.21779 of 2009 ------------------------------- Dated this the 4th August, 2009 J U D G M E N T Raman, J. Petitioner seeks police protection for completion of construction of her compound wall. The matter is pending before the civil court as O.S.No.361 of 2009 on the file of Sub Court, Kottayam. The grievance of the petitioner is that though she has filed an interlocutory application for temporary injunction, the same has not been considered, as a result of which the petitioner is not in a position to complete the construction. 2. We heard the learned Government Pleader. In the view we are taking, it is not necessary to issue notice to the party respondents. 3. Considering the factual situation, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the Sub Court, Kottayam, to hear W.P.(C) No.21779 of 2009 2 and dispose of the interlocutory application for temporary injunction sought to be filed by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. It is open to the petitioner to approach the police thereafter, in case she is successful to get a favourable order from the civil court. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE P.BHAVADASAN , JUDGE. nj.