IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2009 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 9531 of 2009(J) ------------------------------ PETITIONER: -------------- SMT.ABIDA.M.K., LAILA MANZIL, KAITHODU, NILAMEL, KOLLAM. BY MR.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR (PANAMPALLI NAGAR), ADVOCATE. MR.LUIZ GODWIN D'COUTH, ADVOCATE. MR.K.P.CHANDRASEKHAR, ADVOCATE. RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 3. R.D.O., KOLLAM. 4. ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, KOTTARAKKARA. BY MR.P.N. SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.9531 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 25th day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T Against an order passed by the RDO, exercising powers under the Kerala Land Utilisation Order availing of the appellate remedy provided under Section 11 of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967, the petitioner says that she filed Ext.P1 appeal before the 1 st respondent. In this writ petition what the petitioner seeks is a direction to the 1 st respondent to expeditiously dispose of Ext.P1. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, Ext.P1 appeal has been received and is pending, it being a statutory appeal, there is no reason why the same shall not be disposed of. Accordingly, I direct the 1 st respondent to consider Ext.P1 with notice to the petitioner and pass orders thereon. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg