(JL.',^>5 -^TL{2^-' ^i INTHE M.P. STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TfjttBWAL AT RAIPUR ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. (f€^of1998 Applicant : Kabir Swaroop Patel Aged about31years Son of Shri Lallu Ram Patel Resident of Village & Post Devri Thana, Block &Tah. Mungeli Distt. Bilaspur (M.P.) (Ex-Mansevi Sahayak Shikchhak, previously appointed on due selection and eligibilities against the vacant post of Asstt. Teachers, under the Edn. Deptt. of Govt. of M.P.) VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS/ : (1) StateofM.P. RESPONDENTS Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) (2) Commissioner of Public Instructions, Govt. of M.R, Education Deptt., Directorate of Public Instructions, (DPI Oftice), Near Chetak Bridge, Bhopal (M.P.) (3) Deputy Directorof Public Instructions Govt. of M.R, Education Deptt. Education Distt. Bilaspur, P.0. Bilaspur (M.P.) (4) Block Education Officer Govt. ofM.R, Education Deptt. P.0. Munaeli. Tah.Munaeli, Distt. Bilaspur (M.P.) ;i\E(>lication under section 19oftheAdministrativeTribunalAct1985(No.13of1985)readwithArticles14.16. 21 & 311 of the Constitution of India, considered with Principles of Natural and Social Justice. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. j^ HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.2547 OF 2005 Petitioner Kabir Swaroop Patel versus Respondents State ofM.P. and omers Present : Mr. Alok Nigam, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. ORUER (Passed on 7m ofSeptember, 2006) It is submitted that the facts and question of law involved in the present petition are same to that of in Ram Sahay Jha vs. State ofMadhya Pradesh and others (Original Application No. 15/1995). The Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, by itsjudgment and order dated 16-2-1996, allowed the application of the petitioner therein. Leamed counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to approach the respondents/State for consideration and disposal of the petitioner s case in terms of the order dated 16-2-1996 passed in the case of Rdm Sahay Jha (Supra) by Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents/State fairly agrees with the submissions made by leamed counsel for the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation before the respondents - State Authorities for their decision on the representation in the light ofthe order dated 16-2- 1996 passed in the case of Ram Sahay Jha (Supra), in accordance with law, on its own merit, wifhin reasonable time. With the above-stated liberty, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Certified copy as per rules. ^t^ ^^^e Hi?'3al