dvg 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION C IVIL APPLICATION NO. 1536 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 766 OF 2009 Dilip Gangadhar Gaikwad ...Applicants/Intervenors Vs. Maharashtra Rajya Mathadi Transport & General Kamgar Union ...Petitioner. Vs. The State ofMaharashtra & Ors... Respondents. Mr. Sagar Keskar i/by S.K.Shinde for the Union. Mr.Tushar Savgave for respondentNo.2. Mr. M.S.Topkar for petitioner. Mrs. M.P.Ghakur AGP for respondent Nos. 1,4 & 5. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : September 29, 2009. P.C.:- 1. This civil application has been filed by the applicants dvg 2 praying that they may be impleaded as party respondents. 2. We have heard learned Counsel for the applicant and respondent No.2. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioners are disputing the contents of the present civil application, however, they have no objection for impleading the applicants as party respondents. 4. Learned Counsel for 2nd respondent filed reply to the present civil application. It is taken on record. He also states that the 2nd respondent is disputing the contents of the civil application. 5. Keeping all objections of the petitioner and 2nd respondent open, in the interest of justice we grant the civil application in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today. 6. Civil application is disposed of accordingly. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [A.A. SAYED, J.]