IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2460 of 2007 DR. VIVEKANAND SHARMA Versus MANORMA RAI @ AMRITA ----------- 3. 5.9.2008 Mr. V.R.P.Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner at the out set stated that during the pendency of this civil revision application the matrimonial case itself has been decided rendering the civil revision application infructuous. He, however, seeks leave of this Court to raise all these issues which have been pressed in this civil revision application in the resultant first appeal which has been filed by the petitioner against the order of the Family Court. This application is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous with the aforementioned liberty. ( Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/