IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 5200 of 2010 Date of Decision: 26.10.2010 Reena ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKUL MUDGAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Randhir Singh, Addl. A.G. Haryana for respondent No.1. Mr. Rajesh Sheoran, Advocate, for respondent No.2. **** MUKUL MUDGAL, C.J.(Oral) This petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing order/letter dated 29.1.2010 (Annexure P-4) passed by respondent No.1 and further for quashing Rule 2.5 of the Curriculum issued for regulating admission, eligibility conditions for appearing and passing the diploma in education examinations issued by the respondents in so far as it restricts securing at least 20% marks in the subject for considering a candidate for placing him under Compartment and further issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant a chance to the petitioner for appearing in the examinations of Subject No. 15, E-5 of D.Ed.-I examinations course by treating the petitioner as having been placed under Compartment in the said subject for the examinations to be conducted in March/April, 2010. CWP No. 5200 of 2010 [2] 2. Upon notice, respondents No.1 and 2 put in appearance and respondent No.2 filed its written statement. 3. In view of the written statement filed by respondent No.2, learned counsel for the petitioner says that no further grievance of the petitioner survives and therefore, this petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. Ordered accordingly. (MUKUL MUDGAL) CHIEF JUSTICE (AJAY TEWARI) 26.10.2010 JUDGE 'ravinder'