iN In the Honble High Coyrt of Chhattishgarh at Bilaspur (C.G.) w.p. (S) No. ^/^3/o/ 2eer Petitioner Respondent... ^b -'0"'<U;^-( ^^ ^.^^ ^a-f^^v lr|o|^K'L .. ..^:fFlara^iRam Yadav ^^ A9ed_45 vears " S/0 Shri Binjhuwar Singh Yadav, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primery School, Dewre(D), District, Durg (C.G.) VERSUS I.The State Government of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) ^v ^^•^ ^^ 2. Th<Blocg)Education Officer, Durg (C.G) <^^ \.o Writ petition under articles 226/227 of the Constitution pf Ijidla for issuance of writ jn the nature of MAN^AjVIUSi Certiprar'^ Pj-ohibltion and other sujtable WRIT prwj'jts, Qrder pr prders, Direction or directions. The petitioner, above named, furnishes the particulars of the writ petition as under:- KWU COURT OF CHHATnSfiAltH AT BnjtSPUt SIN6LJEBBM&L HOMBL6A . SATISH K. AfiNIHOTBX^JT, WRTT PETTTION fS) No.491 OF 2007 Ptetitioner : Ramnath Rathore versus Respondents State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh and ol+iers WRTT PFTmON tS) No.492 OF 2007 Petitioner : tokesh Bahadur Singh versys Respondents ; State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh and others And WRTT PETTTION fS)No.4930F 2007 Petitroner : Harakh Rnm Yadw ysrsjs Respondents The State fiovemment of Oihaf'isgarh and anotiwr Preaent : Mr. Ajoy Shriviwtava, counsel for the petith»ner(s). Mr. Arvind Dubey, Peaiel lawyer for •the respondents/State. ORDER 0'assed on this 25th Day of Jonuory, 2007) Leomed counsel cppearing for the parties jomtly submit that th<; facts <md question of lenv involved m the present batch of writ petitwns are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in •the case of YadwtHft 16mar BheHvdimj m. Mimtefpal Cofpotwrtwi. fltffy mef dwfAw*. -[^_ '^/ ^ > 2. Fpr liie aforcmentioned reaaons, thcae writ petitwna ura diaposBd of in terms of the decision of this Court' in Ihc nwtter of Yashwesit Kumcv fi^dnKAwiy'(5upro), Subject to verification of the fflBt as to whether the petittoners have acquired B.Ed./B.TJ. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and l-3-1999 ond further whether they have been paid t*»o odvance increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order beplaced on the record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Subbub 1 Z006CII)AWJR-C696