CRM No.M-13819 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM No.M-13819 of 2011 Date of decision : 8.7.2011 Mesar .........Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .......Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI : Present : Mr.Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner Ms.Sushma Chopra, Addl.AG, Haryana --- M.M.S.Bedi, J. (Oral) The petitioners having been granted the concession of bail in this case absented himself and propounded a false plea for his absence that he was lodged in a jail, which plea was found to be false. Without expression of any opinion regarding the reason for absence or misuse of the concession of bail, it is sufficient to observe that the petitioner has been in custody w.e.f. 9th March, 2010 after his re-arrest and no witness has been examined from 9.3.2010 till date. Taking into consideration the above circumstance, the petitioner can be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond for heavy amount. The petition is allowed and it is ordered that petitioner will be released on bail on his furnishing personal bail bond with two surety bonds for ` 50,000/-each; out of the said sureties, one surety should be local. The above said order has been passed to safeguard and secure the presence of the petitioner who happens to be a resident of UP and on earlier occasion had absented himself on raising a wrong plea. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE 8.7.2011 akm