IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.19597 of 2011 Pushpa Devi wife of Late Baijnath Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3/ 28.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that even though there is allegation that the petitioner and others had assaulted the husband of the informant, but it transpired that in fact the deceased attempted to commit robbery in course of which he fell down from the terrace and injured himself and thereafter was removed to the hospital where he died. A substantive case was also filed against him. In view of such, in the event of surrender of the petitioner, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No.78 of 2011, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C., and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date 2 and be present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (v) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)