IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 24930 of 2008 Between: 1 Bibi Mahila Podupu Sangam Annavaram Village, Chapad Mandal, Kadapa District, rep by its President, Smt. S. Bibi W/o Mahaboob Basha, R/o Annavaram Village, Chapad Mandal, Kadapa District. 2 Satya Mahila Podupu Sangam, r/o Annavaram village, Chapad Mandal, Kadapa District, rep by its President, Smt. Bapanapalle Lakshmamma W/o Pedda Kondaiah aged about 45 years R/o Annavaram Village, Chapad mandal, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Tahsildar, Chapad Mandal Kadapa District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Jammala Madugu Kadapa District. 3 The joint Collector, Kadapa, Kadapa District. 4 The Mandal Educational Officer, Chapad, Kadapa District. 5 The District Educational Officer, Chapad, kadapa District. 6 Annavaram Gram Panchayat Chapad mandal, Kadapa District rep by its Panchayat Secretary 7 Annavaram Gram Panchayat Chapad Mandal, , rep by its Sarpanch 8 Government of A.P, repby its Secretary, Department Education, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 9 The Zilla Parishad High School, Annavaram Village, Chapad mandal, rep by its Head Master. 10 Bapanapalle Chinna Balakondaiah S/o Naanna R/o Annavaram Gram panchayat Chapad Mandal, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.R.SANKU & KAVITI MURLI KRISNA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: Pursuant to the order of this Court dt. 28.4.2009, the 8th respondent has filed a counter affidavit. The counter of the 8th respondent states that by the proceedings dt. 25.5.2009 of the 3rd respondent, the earlier proceedings dt. 8.11.2007 appointing the 10th respondent as implementing agency for the mid-day meals scheme in the 9th respondent school has been withdrawn. In the circumstances, the substantive grievance in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________​ GODA RAGHURAM,J 5.6.2009. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No. 24930 of 2008 Dated: 5.6.2009.