1 WP 5955.2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5955 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. S.G.Thombre, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.B.Pulkundwar, Asstt.Govt. Pleader for State. ................................ CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE :27/09/2011 PER COURT : 1. The petitioners had filed Complaint (U.L.P.) No. 90 of 2000 before the Labour Court, Aurangabad for continuity of service, full back wages and service benefits. The respondents denied the relationship and further contended that the petitioners have been paid the compensation. The Labour Court dismissed the said complaint. Aggrieved thereby, the present Writ Petition has been filed. 2. Mr. Thombre, the learned counsel for the petitioners vehemently submits that in fact the amount of Rs. 28,000/- paid was in respect of the salary and not the compensation as per Section 25-FF of the Industrial Disputes Act. The Court has not considered this aspect. There is also nothing 2 WP 5955.2011 on record to show that the said amount of Rs. 28,000/- was paid towards the retrenchment compensation or otherwise. The petitioners have specifically contended about it. 3. With the assistance of the learned counsel, I have gone through the Judgment. 4. The Court has discussed about the evidence before it and about the attending circumstances and has come to the conclusion that the said amount of Rs. 28,000/- was paid in the year 1998 and the same was towards the compensation. The Complaint is filed in the year 2000. 5. No perversity appears in the order passed by the Court below. In such circumstances, no case of interference is made out in the limited jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 6. The Writ Petition as such is dismissed. No costs. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] KNP/WP 5955.2011 3 WP 5955.2011