HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.26110 of 2010 Date: November 22, 2010 Between: Smt. Eedhara Alivelu, W/o. E. Siva, Tadikonda Village & Mandal, Guntur District … Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others … Respondents Order: The petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Guntur, Guntur District to conduct enquiry against the fourth respondent, Station House Officer, P.S., Tadikonda, Guntur District for his indecent acts and also to direct him to register a case against the fifth respondent herein after conducting detailed enquiry. It is the case of the petitioner, a Washerwoman by profession, that she is a resident of Tadikonda village and Mandal of Guntur District. It is stated that her husband possesses a residential property having acquired the same from his father under an oral partition and after partition she and her husband have been in possession and enjoyment of the same; while so, on 09-10-2010 at about 9.00 p.m., the fifth respondent herein, who is her younger brother-in-law, picked up quarrel with her in an inebriated condition. It is stated that when she lodged a complaint against the fifth respondent before the fourth respondent, Station House Officer, P.S., Tadikonda; instead of initiating action against the fifth respondent, the fourth respondent threatened, maligned and abused her in filthy language. The fourth respondent, Sub-Inspector of Police, P.S., Tadikonda, has filed counter-affidavit. While denying various allegations made by the petitioner, in the counter- affidavit, it is stated that no complaint has been made by the petitioner against the fifth respondent and she has not been maligned as alleged. It is stated that the respondents have nothing to do with the dispute between the petitioner and the fifth respondent and there is no interference by them and the writ petition is filed with false allegations. Though it is the allegation of the petitioner that she lodged a complaint against the fifth respondent before the fourth respondent, it is the categorical averment in the counter-affidavit filed by the fourth respondent that no complaint whatsoever is received from the petitioner. When there is no complaint at all, the question of taking up investigation does not arise. Further, from the contents of the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, it appears, the dispute between the petitioner and the fifth respondent is with regard to a house property and the same is purely of civil nature. In any event, it is evident from the counter-affidavit that no complaint has been made by the petitioner against the fifth respondent and there is also no interference by the respondents in the dispute between the petitioner and the fifth respondent. In that view of the matter, no directions can be issued as prayed for. The writ petition is devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ (R. SUBHASH REDDY, J) November 22, 2010 MRR