IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10566 of 2005 Between: 1 St.John's Educational and Development Society, Cumbum-523 333, Prakasam District, A.P., rep., by its President Smt.B.H.K.Sarojini, w/o B.Danam,aged 60 years, r/of 104, Dwaraka Apartments, Thakur Mansion Lane, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. 2 St.John's College of Education, Aswaraopet Khammam District, A.P., rep., by its President. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Government of A.P., rep., by its Principal Secretary, School Education, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Commissioner & Director of School education, Government of A.P., Hyderabad. 3 Government of A.P., rep., by its Principal Secretary, Minority Welfare Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularlyone in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st and 2nd respondents in not taking steps for forwarding a report in respect of the petitioners application for recognition as a Minority Educational Institution to the 3rd respondent for enabling the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioners application for grant of recognition as a minority educational institution, as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to treat and recognize the 2nd petitioner institution as a minority educational institution for all purposes for the academic year 2004-2005 and future years and pass such further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following : O R D E R: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the cause of action in the writ petition does not survive and thereby the writ petition has become infructuous. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. 10th June, 2009. ( B.Seshasayana Reddy,J ) tnb ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RS} THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.10566 OF 2005 10TH JUNE 2009