/ 1 / IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2071 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4044 OF 2008 Smt. Daya @ Daksha Vivekanand ...Applicant vs. Shri Vivekanand P. Vyas ...Respondent --- Mr. P.S. Gidwani & Ms. Maya B. Idnani for Applicant Mrs. Manjula Rao i/b./ H.P. Vyas for Respondent ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 20TH OCTOBER, 2008 P.C. 1. This is an application for reviewing the order dated 26th June, 2008. In my view, it is not necessary to clarify or modify the said order, since in the said order a clear direction was given to the Family Court. The maintenance application has been filed by the wife, which is pending and the main petition, which was filed in the Family Court, was also pending for quite some time. The cross examination of the witnesses has also begun. However, in my view, it would be appropriate if the maintenance application is decided expeditiously first, though the trial may also proceed. Both the parties are directed to co-operate with the Family Court judge . It is expected that whenever interim application for maintenance is filed, it should be decided expeditiously by the Family Court. The Trial Court shall decide the interim / 2 / application on the next date and, thereafter, proceed to decide the main petition. V.M. KANADE J.