IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Interim relief application No.6450 of 2010 In Writ Petition No. 651 of 2010 (S/S) Dhani Singh Jalal and others. ……Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …….Respondents. Mr. B.S. Negi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.C. Tiwari, Brief Holder for the respondents. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Learned counsel for the petitioners confines his prayer only to relief no.2 and submits that the writ petition may be disposed of finally today itself at the admission stage. Prayer No.2 in the writ petition has been made to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioners pending before it within stipulated period as prescribed by this Hon’ble Court. The representations have been annexed as annexure Nos. 12 and 13 to the writ petition. Learned Brief Holder for the State- respondents has submitted that if the order is passed to decide the representations, he has no objection. The prayer is innocuous. The respondent no. 2 is directed to decide the representations of the petitioners, which has been annexed as annexure Nos. 12 and 13 to the writ petition, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of the production of the certified copy of this order in accordance with law. With the said direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly. (B.S.Verma, J.) 05-08-2010 MK