IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32186 of 2009 JEEV NATH MISHRA . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3. 12.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence on behalf of the Panchayat Sachiv in a Police case under Sections 406, 420 and other provisions of the Penal Code is that he was not the sole person who effected the purchases in question but did do as part of a team. The allegations are of defalcation and misappropriation of Government money based on a preliminary enquiry report, submitted whereafter the F.I.R. has been lodged. This Court does not consider the present to be a fit case for privilege of anticipatory bail. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered on its own merits, without being prejudiced by the present order. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)