1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 982 of 2001 (Subhash Jitmal Bajaj Vs. Ashok Tukaram Lonkar) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATE : 25 th November, 2008 Heard Shri V.P. Panpalia for the petitioner, and Shri A.J. Thakkar for the sole respondent. This writ petition was preferred by the petitioner against the order passed by the Rent Controller as well as the appellate authority rejecting the application filed by the petitioner- landlord under Clauses 13(3)(vi) (vii) and (viii) of the Rent Control Order. It is stated on behalf of the parties that the respondent – tenant has purchased the property in question during the pendency of the writ petition and hence the cause to proceed with the writ petition does not survive. In view of the statements made on behalf the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE RMP