1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 1869 OF 2009 Vijay S/o Hiraman Gavane Versus The State of Maharashtra. *** Mr. R. S. Shinde, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. S. G. Nandedkar, A.P.P. for the Respondent / State. *** CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED: 1st OCTOBER, 2009. 1. Heard. This is successive bail application in Crime No.I-308 of 2007 registered with Rahuri Police Station, Rahuri for an offence under sections 302, 143, 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 427 of IPC. 2. The request to release on bail, in Application No.3119 of 2008, was rejected by order dated 4th December, 2008. There were directions by this Court for disposal of the Sessions Case within a time frame. However, the learned Judge could not do so as he has explained the same in his communication to the 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. office and naturally the time was required to be extended for disposal of the case. 3. Since the learned Judge is bound to complete the trial in time frame, I do not see any justification for grant of bail in a matter of such complicity. Application rejected. 4. Needless to repeat, the learned Judge will ensure time schedule scrupulously. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:01/10/2009. ans/1869