IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI FRIDAY, THE 6TH JUNE 2008 / 16TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 31479 of 2007(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SASIDHARAN, S/O.RAMAKRISHNAN, AGED 67 YEARS, PATTATHUVILAKATHU VEEDU, KULATHOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.SURESH SRI.G.SUDHEER RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEADQUARTERS, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THUMBA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. PRAKASAN, S/O.RAMAKRISHNAN, ANANDHU BHAVAN, EZHIPURA, PARIPPALLY, KOLLAM, PIN CODE 691 574.. BY ADV. SRI.D.KISHORE FOR R4 GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC 31479/07 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS. EXT.P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 16.1.2004 EXECUTED BY THE PETITIONER AND 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT AS O.S.NO.494/2006 FILED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT BEFORE THE SUB COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 27.9.2006. EXT.P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 6.10.2006 IN IA NO.4581/2006 IN O.S.NO.494/2006 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL SUB JUDGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. EXT.P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER AGAINST THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATD 28.5.2997 IN O.S.NO.494/2006. EXT.P5 - TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SUB COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM IN O.S.NO.494/2006 WITH AFFIDAVIT DATED 27.6.2007. /TRUE COPY/ K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 31479 OF 2007-V ----------------------------------------- Dated 6th June, 2008. JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair, J. The writ petitioner has approached this Court, alleging that the police are interfering with the civil dispute between him and the 4th respondent, who is his brother. In that process, the petitioner is being harassed by the police, it is submitted. 2. But, the respondents, including the 4th respondent, deny the allegations against them. The learned Government Pleader further submitted that the police have no intention, whatsoever, to harass the petitioner. This submission is recorded and the Writ Petition is disposed of. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE. Nm/