»•"£;»•»• !!-sE?!t§!si'S? ^S&^:K::^s:3fS^ :i31.';J!"IK*tei;^'-t->. i-': -^. ^•J<'.". |B;s!*4<iN®St. fflGH COCRT OF GHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WritPetidonNo. 6081 of2000 Bhagwandas son of Mangulal Jaiswal, resident of village Bargawan, Tahsil Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja(M.P.) VERSUS 1. Kailasi wife of Boyaram, resident of village Bargawaan, Tahsil Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (M.P.) 2. Dhan Sai son of Soaar Sai, resident of Village Belkliaria, Tahsil Ainbikapur, Distt. Surgtija (M.P.). 3. Dev Sharan Son of Paliar Singh, resident of village Belkharia, Tahsil Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (M.P.). 4. The State of M.P. tfarou^i the Collector, Surguja at Ainbikapur (M.P.). 5. Sub Divisional OfBcer, Ambikapur, Surgyja at Ainbikapur (M.P.) 6. The Collector, Distt. Surguja, Ambikapiu- (M.P.). 7. The Comnussioner, Bilaspiu- Division, Bilaspur(M.P.) (TVRIT PETmON U~NT)ER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB; Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnjliotai, J.) Present : Noneforthepetitionei-. Shri Yashwant Tiwari, Advocate for fhe respondent No. 1. Shri Arviiid Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.4 to 7. ORALORDER (Passed on this 29 ofNovember, 2007) 1. The matter is called for hearing twice. On botfa occasions, none appeare nor any representation is made on behatf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. 2. In view ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want ofprosecution. 3. Registry is direeted to send a certified copy of this order to the petitioner forthwith. Satish K.Agnihotri Judge /IRIlt