IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8101 of 2011 Renu Kumari, wife of Sri Ambika Saran Singh, resident of Village- Brahampura, P.O.Asharhi, P.S.Hilsa, District-Nalanda … Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, Nalanda 3. The District Education Superintendent, Nalanda 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Hilsa, District-Nalanda 5. The Block Education Extension Officer, Hilsa, District-Nalanda 6. The Block Development Officer, Hilsa, District-Nalanda 7. Anjani Kumar, Mukhiya of Asharhi Gram Panchayat, Block- Hilsa, District-Nalanda 8. Kameshwar Prasad, Panchayat Sewak, Gram Panchayat, Asharhi, Block-Hilsa, District-Nalanda ……….. Respondents. ---------------------------------- For the petitioner: Ms. Sheela Sharma and Mr. Shivendra Kr. Roy, Advocates For the State: Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh AC to SC 21. ---------------------------------- 2. 16.9.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 28.8.2009 passed by the District Magistrate, Nalanda by which the appointment of the petitioner on the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra has been cancelled. By the said impugned order the District Magistrate had cancelled the appointments of as many as 8 persons appointed as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra on the ground that their appointments have been made in violation of the relevant Government Circulars. The matter ultimately traveled to this Court and by order dated 5.4.2011 in LPA No. 273/2011 2 (Randhir Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & ors.) the impugned order dated 28.8.2009 was set aside along with the order of the learned Single Judge. Thereafter six other Panchayat Shiksha Mitra affected by the order dated 28.8.2009 had also been granted similar reliefs in various writ petitions. The petitioner is the last among the 8 who, having been affected by the said impugned order, have approached this Court. In view of the decision of the Division Bench dated 5.4.2011 passed in LPA No. 273/2011 (Randhir Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar and ors.), although it is stated therein that the order shall not be treated as a precedent in the cases in future, but considering the fact that the same impugned order is involved in the present matter also, the present writ application is also allowed and the impugned order dated 28.8.2011 is set aside. S.Pandey (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)