IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC SATURDAY, THE 30TH JANUARY 2010 / 10TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 3066 of 2010(G) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.P.PAUL, GED 44, S/O. P.K.POULOSE, PULLAN HOUSE, CHALAKUDY.P.O., THRISSUR, COUNCILOR, WARD NO.12, CHALAKUDY MUNICIPLITY. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SMT.PREETHY KARUNAKARAN SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY, TO GOVT. LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT,GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CHALAKUDY MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, CHALAKUDY.P.O., THRISSUR. 3. THE CHALAKUDY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, CHALAKUDY MUNICIPALITY, CHALAKUDY.P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. U.V.MARTIN, S/O. VARGHESE, UKKEN HOUSE, CHALAKUDY.P.O., COUNCILOR, WARD NO.21, CHALAKUDY MUNICIPALITY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY GP K.R.DEEPA SC SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------ WP(C) No. 3066 of 2010 -------------------------- Dated, this the 30th day of January, 2010 J U D G M E N T 1. Petitioner is a councilor of Chalakkudy Municipality, the 2nd respondent herein. He is fighting against the resolution passed by the Municipality resolving to shift the site of the private bus stand. It is seen that he has already moved the Government seeking to get the resolution rescinded and has also moved the Ombudsman complaining that in the aforesaid proposal, there is maladministration. Both these proceedings are pending. It is during the pendency of the aforesaid proceedings, that on the very same issue, this writ petition is also filed praying to quash the resolution and to direct that an enquiry be conducted. 2. In my view, this is the 3rd proceedings sought to be initiated by the petitioner on the very same issue and such parallel proceedings cannot be permitted. For that reason, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition. W.P.(C).3066/10 2 3. However having regard to the fact that Ext.P6 is pending before the 1st respondent, it is directed that the 1st respondent shall deal with Ext.P6 with notice to the petitioner, Municipality and other affected parties, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, Jude mrcs