SBCWP5176/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5176/2010 Om Prakash Sharma Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order ::: 16.04.2010 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Ram Pratap Saini, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court:- Contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that despite specific judgment passed in petitioner's case being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7506/2009 decided on 17.07.2009, directing respondents to consider petitioner's case of continuation in service till RPSC/DPC selected candidates are available, and that next academic session is about to start and even urgent temporary appointments under Rule 28 of the Rules of 1971 are not permissible, the respondents are not considering petitioner's case for continuation in service till availability of regularly selected candidates from RPSC/DPC. If according to petitioner's perception, the respondents have terminated or are going to terminate his SBCWP5176/2010 // 2 // services without fulfilling any of the conditions of the judgment dated 08.05.2009 of this Court passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4652/2009, Sarita Kumari & Others Vs. State & Others, remedy for him is seek implementation of the aforesaid judgment by filing appropriate contempt petition against respondents and not a fresh writ petition because that issue has already been finally adjudicated upon in the said writ petition filed by the petitioner earlier. Writ petition accordingly stands disposed of with aforesaid observation. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//