-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 173 OF 2010 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NOS. 866 AND 2756 OF 2010 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1611 OF 2008 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 388 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 4345 OF 2008 M/s. R.J. Construction and others ...Appellants versus Premjir H. Shah, since deceased, represented by L.Rs and others ... Respondents Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Gaurav Joshi and Mr. Rohan Rajadhyaksha, instructed by M/s. Thakore Jariwala & Associates, for the appellants. Mr. F.E. D’Vitre, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Swapnil Bangoor, instructed by M/s. L.C.Tolat & Company, for respondent Nos. 1 to 5. Mr. A.K. Shaikh, representative of Court Receiver, present. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: OCTOBER 19, 2010. P.C. This appeal is directed against the ad-interim order of the learned single Judge dated 5th March, 2010 passed in Notice no. 773 of 2009 in Chamber Summons No. 1611 of 2008 in Execution Application No. 193 of 2009. -2- It is an admitted fact that the Chamber Summons is still pending before the learned single Judge and is not disposed of finally. By the impugned order, the learned single Judge has appointed Court Receiver and asked him to take symbolic possession of 4700 sq.mtrs. of land as set out in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of the Consent Terms so also shown by pink colour in Exhibit-E to the affidavit in support of the Chamber Summons. The learned single Judge directed the Court Receiver to take inventory and the defendants were restrained from creating any third party rights. It is pointed out out by both the Advocates that the Chamber Summons is still pending before the learned single Judge and is not disposed of finally. In the meanwhile, Receiver’s report is also placed on record. Objections are also pointed out to such report by the learned counsel for the appellants. 2. In our view, instead of entertaining the appeal at such an interlocutory stage, it would be just and proper to request the learned single Judge to dispose of the Chamber Summons within a period of three months from today and the materials placed before this Court in the present appeal may be placed before the learned single Judge and the Receiver’s report may also be placed before the learned single Judge. The learned single Judge is requested to consider and pass an appropriate order. Till the Chamber Summons is disposed of, the order passed by this Court on 29th March, 2010 shall continue to operate and to that effect the order of the learned single Judge -3- shall stand modified. The Appeal and the Notices of Motion are accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.