Eetjiioner Respondents COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petltion No; 6302 of 2005 Raj Kumar Deshmukh, aged about 42 years, S/o. l.at8 Shri G.R. Deshmukh, r/o. viliage Salonl, P.0. Mahud, P.S. Gundredehi, Distt. Durg (CG). Versus ! ' - .1) The State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Mlnlstry :of Home, Mantralaya, Q.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. 1 • . 2) Dlrector©ene.raiofPoiice,Ralpur. 3) Inspector Generai of Police, Poisce Head Quarters, Rajpur. 4) SuperintendentofPoJice,Durg(CG). (Writ Petition under Articie 226/227 of Constitution of indla) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnlhotri, J. Present: • Mr. ParagKotecha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on this 18th day of March, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State submits that the petitioner has already continued at the original place of postlng for more than three years on account1 of interim order dated '21 "3-2006 granted by this court. The State/respondents may be granted libeity^to p.ass appropriate orders - keeping in view public Interest and administrative exigency. yr. Shrivastava further submits that the respondents/State shali not insist upon compliance of the impugned order 10-6-2005 (Annexure P/1). 2) In view of the above, according to learned counsei appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudicationin this petition. 3) Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. 4) interim reiief granted on 21-3-2006 standsvacated.- Consequentiy, M.W.P.No. 2204 of 2006 aiso stands dlsposed of. i Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge :RS;U