IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44839 of 2009 POONAM KUMARI Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 25.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Enclosure of marks of optional subject, English is said committing forgery in the document but that is done by the Board itself. This much of the allegation may be taken for anticipatory bail to the petitioner but his prayer was rejected as far back as on 16.10.2008 and petitioner kept herself away from even Investigating Officer that is only sufficient for refusal of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. However, petitioner is directed to surrender before the Court below and pray for regular bail, which shall be decided on its own merit without being prejudiced by the rejection order. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)