IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9945 of 2011 Niranjan Roy Versus Dharmendra Kumar Singh & Anr ----------- 02. 30.06.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application has been filed against the order dated 19.02.2011 passed by Sub Judge III, Katihar in Title Suit No.53 of 2008 whereby the learned Court below rejected the application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed on behalf of the defendant-petitioner to reject the plaint. It appears that plaintiff-respondent filed aforesaid suit for Specific Performance of Contract dated 16.03.2007. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the plaint should have been rejected because it is barred under Section 17 of the Registration Act. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Court below considering various decisions and other provisions of law has rejected the application filed by the petitioner. I find no reason to interfere with the impugned order because it is not a case that the learned Court below has not acted within the bounds of its jurisdiction. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. Saurabh ( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)