^^^} BEFiaRE^MlE^ON?Bi.El^eHliEiWl^OReWMATTIS^ Bil.ASfUR WRII'RETiTIiaN^SeitNfi. Q'FSOl^. ,Jfe PETITlONER Nityanand'Mishra,?':; ^ --; ^ ^^^^^"^ S/c^l^t^^Rarnakant Misttra, , ^ ^ ;Aged/^b6yt,&2ygars,,:,^.c;^,'/,;':::;,:,;'^ R/ff Shantis NaQar, ^ No.l, Rajnandgaon, C.G. VERSUiS ^RES»iE);RlBjEN^y:.^.;%:l, ^^y.. ^SM^.^ ^^x ..<'(^/:-\'>-Y; ^^y' ^^^^'Y^ ^f <»"' StciteQfChhattiSgarhThrough-^ Jfie Secr6tai^, ^ Department ^f^l^ .Self Government, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mahtralaya, Raipur (C.G.) ; Oirector,^. V,': •.••:'•.'•1::,-^ Local SelfGoyernment,^RaTpuF(C.(3.), Municipal Gprpoi^tion ^^^^ ThrotigK- Gommissioner,^^ F^ ^^TIPETIT]E©ISiUNiaER.Al^lGLE2Z60FTMECC^STI1^ OFINDIA. '^. »i ft HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETmON (S) No. 212 of2011 PETITIONER : NityanandMishra. VERSU8 RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRTT PETITION UNDER AR'HCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OE INDIA ' : . ....::.^..., 8B: Hon'ble Shri Satfsh K. Aenihotri, J. Present: ShriSatyendraSahu^Advocateforthepetitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. OfiDERfORAL) (Passed on 14 day of January, 2011) 1. Leamedcounselappearingforlhepetitionersubmitsthatfhecase, being payment of retiral benefits matter, may be referred tp tfae pension eonmuttee. 2. 'rhis Court, in the tnatter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (BaijnathMmdal v. The State of Chhafttsgarh & Qthers) assAvSasit connected matters, directed fhe Committee to consider the matter ofretiral dues as fhe disputed question of facts were iavolved. The Committee was constituted by the State Govemment, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt Keja BaiChcmdrckar Vs. State Govemmentandothers)^aKdords[ dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2WS (State of Chhattisgarh & Others v. Baijnath Mandal and anorter). Thus, this petition is squarely eovered by the judgaent and order dated - 31st of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 Ba^afA r? Mandal (supra) as subniitted by leamed counsel appearuig for the parties. 3. This petition is accordingly disposed ofinthe same tenns i.e. the ofiBce ofthe Advoeate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date ofreeeipt ofa copy ofthe petition from the petitioner and tins order. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the ofBcers concemed, wilhin a further period of 15 days. The Conamttee shall consider and pass order, ia accordaaee with law, afler afifordiag proper opportunity oifhearing to the petitioner. The p^itioner aad fhe officers concemed may file additional documarts, ifnecessaiy. The entire exercise, including payment ofretiral dues, ifany,to Ifae petitioner be completed wiflun a period ofsix weeks fromthe date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. 4. The petitioner shall supply extra copy oflhe petition to the leamed counsel appearing for the respondents for forwarding the same to theCommittee. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 'l~;/