@ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON’BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J. Misc. Appeal (C) (PR) No. 997 of 2011 MkC 5w) \u élair$1gans 99 lg 1 Smt Kuleshwar Sunita Prasad, @ Basanti aged Sharma, about W/o 46 years. Kuleshwar Prasad, S/o Ramadhar Sharma, aged about 52 ears. Both aré‘ R/o PWD — 24, Kotwali Police Line Sector — 6 Bhilai, Thana — Bhilai Nagar, Tah & Distt — Durg (CG) VERSUS wmw~v.,,ww_\_..,.,w~ N t u Respondents 1. Shivshankar Prasad, S/o Bhagwan Non-applicants Das, aged about 28 years, R/o DN Construction Ltd., Chherikhedi, Thana — Mandir Hasod, Disttr— Raipur (CG) (Driver of the vehicle) 2. DN Construction Ltd., 13‘ Floor ofthe State Bank of Indore, Telibandha Raipur, Distt —— Raipur (CG) (owner of the Vehicie) 3. ICICI Lombard Insurance Company Ltd., Through — Branch Manager, Satara Badi, 15‘ Floorof‘the State Bank of Indore, Durg, Tah & Distt- Durg (CG) (insurance Company) MISC. APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988. Present: None for the appeiiants. W y ORDER (26m Aprn, 2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appellants. 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are teft with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- J y r Sd/_ nimmi Chief Justice RN, CHANDRAKAR. Judge