IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9184 of 2009 RAM BABU KUNWAR @ RAMBABU KUAR & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 15.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that though petitioners have been found guilty for misusing the privilege of bail but it was their misconception only that the differences of the wife and husband there was successful reconciliation, basing which wife (informant) accompanied the petitioner no.1 and continuing up-till- now. Misconception was about coming to end of the case, however, that is pending. There may be every sympathy with the petitioners if the submission is found correct after verification from the wife but that is possible in court where the case is pending. Finding no case of anticipatory bail, petitioners’ prayer is rejected. However, petitioners shall surrender within two months before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in Bochachan P.S. case no. 82 of 1993 corresponding to Tr.no. 114/08 and pray for regular bail which shall be considered and decided on its own merit on the same day without being prejudiced by the present order of dismissal. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI