IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT: THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 13441 OF 2011 AND W.P.M.P.NO. 20071 OF 2011 Between: Mohammed Rafeeq Ahmed ... PETITIONER AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh and another. ...RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 13441 OF 2011 AND W.P.M.P.NO.20071 OF 2011 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed aggrieved by the proceedings of respondent No.2, dated 25.04.2011, whereunder the permit of the petitioner’s vehicle was suspended for the period from 25.04.2011 to 05.05.2011. As could be seen from the impugned proceedings, the period of suspension has been over and it is not disputed before this Court that the vehicle was released thereafter. However, the petitioner filed W.P.M.P.No.20071 of 2011 alleging that even after release of the vehicle, the respondents have been harassing the petitioner by refusing to renew the licence and insisting to deposit the vehicle at their Depot once again. Hence, the petitioner seeks a further direction to the respondents not to harass the petitioner. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. Having regard to the specific plea of the petitioner that the permit of the petitioner is subsisting as of today, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents not to interfere with the plying of the vehicle in question without following due process of law. Accordingly, both W.P.M.P. and the main Writ Petition are disposed of. No costs. _____________ G. ROHINI, J JUNE 24, 2011. YVL