IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M- 18369 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 29.07.2011 Gopal Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Anr. ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Khungar,Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate for respondent No. 2. **** SABINA, J. Petitioner has filed the petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing FIR No. 62 dated 29.1.2010 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 353, 186, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code ('IPC' for short), registered at Police Station City, Sirsa and consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that although the petitioner was named in the FIR but the complainant has submitted the affidavit to the Investigating Agency (Annexure P-2) to the effect that the petitioner was not present at the spot and in fact some other persons had formed the mob and he had no objection if the FIR in question qua the petitioner is ordered to be quashed. Learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 has not controverted the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner. In these circumstances, it would be just and expedient CRM No. M -18369 of 2010 -2- to quash the FIR in question qua the petitioner. Accordingly this petition is allowed. The FIR No. 62 dated 29.1.2010 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 353, 186, 504, 506, read with Section 34 of IPC registered at Police Station City, Sirsa and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed qua the petitioner. (SABINA) 29.07.2011 JUDGE Poonam (II)