IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2011 / 20TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 21944 of 2011(P) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- GREESHMA SURESH, DAUGHTER OF SURESH PATTALI, PATTALI HOUSE, PERINGOTTUKARA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, KERALA. BY ADV. SRI.V.JOHN MANI RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., KERALA-673635. 2. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., KERALA-673635. BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC., UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 21944/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 21/03/2011. P2: COPY OF THE RECEIPT EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF THE NECESSARY FEE FOR REVALUING THE PETITIONER'S ANSWER SHEET DATED 29/06/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 21944 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 11th day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Com Degree Course. When the result of the third year examination was declared, she had failed in one paper viz., “Financial Accounting”. She applied for revaluation as per Ext.P1 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp