.'^•'^'^^^??C^S''^^^.^'^L^T;'/'^' ^-^' ^ r~~'^^-J^-^^'/-;-^-'~''-'n-.^t.:^:.rvr'.:' IN TimlHGHCOlIRf OF eHHATTISGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR • Cr.M.P. No. Single Banch o /2010 ..^^s^ ^^^^^; Gajanand Prasad, S/o-Shri Jyoti Lal Sahu, VitWnt**ws'l\S?..\^--" ' Aged about 40 years, nA!<..···-"""^-5tC^%V''> n-^ R/o-R/O-BusStandBilaspur, "' c-'^^>°' Permanent resident ofP.S. Chowki- Chapora Road, Dabhra, Tehsil & P.S. -Dabhra, Distt. Janjgir-Cfaampa, Chhattisgarh PETITIONER VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh, P.S.-Sarsiwa, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh RESPONDENT y" PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF CODE OF£RIM1NAL PROCEDURE. 1973 ^— z- 1 f^ ^ ^' sn^iwft'ihr ^IT 3I1^?T*4 '^SET ^iqid<i, ©•al+i'is,(s|<ni<-iy >.Vjo- 636/fo WWIT (bWtS | •(H; 200 SflI^T 'V (tllsi'i6!) ^WtR yfca ^llf^l ??^. - S E——5I-t^ ^SE-—S ffis—.-,:„^^—— as—t-l— e'as^—:-.—^JL-^. .„ t : MOn'uis snn iviaiiinura Bjorian snnvasiava. j. 22<9-20in bnn r-'anKaj ynrivastava, cqunsei Shri Avinash K.mishra, Par^ei Lawyei" for the Stats. neara. Tnis petition under Sectiori part of the order dated 30/07/20) Judge, Baioda Bazar, District 'which, whiie aliowing the applii^ producins the accused driver ofthl tiuDmission OT ieameQ couii whiie ailowing the appi'cant couic] the reglstered ovifner of the vehlci^ 482 of Cr.P.C. has bsen uisd against the O passed by Second Auditionai Ssssions R^iDur In Criminai Revision No.37/2010 by appiit^tion for reiease of vehicle, condition of uury or ine invesiiuauon agency iq and irnDosition of such coriQ'itioih amounts to virtuai rejection of the sauDmission OT learnea ol iFnuosiriy sucH concituon apoears driver'who Is abscondlns. The appilcant who appiie^ owner OT ine venicie. i nere isi prosecuiion naa rnaae an'v overt act in concealing or hiding comrnission of offence. it Is bevo sucr' conuiiion couiu oe impose<p reiease of the vehicle. imposinj ttn<iI<'i-(iH *ff*i(ti*l' ^? fet&l <FII<^K ^?3TfiCT 311^1 ror ine peiiiionsr. 3 vehicie has been imposed. isei ror ine apDiicani is inai ine i-'oun ueiow .E;^.; — ^- -» noi nsv©ttTiDoseCi any sucn conoiuon on as the accused is absconuinQ and it Is the make investisation ario arrest the accused of the Court is whoiiv exlraneous and ,- — i: — .^^L: ^ppiicaiion ror reiease OT ine venicie. jats eounsel is that' the purposs behind |io ue 10 secure oresence anu arrest OT tne ror reiease or venicie is uie registereu nothiny in the order to show that the y aiieg^tion against the appiicant regarding any any sviaence in conneciion 'wiin aiieueu |id comprshension of this Court as to ho'w on the resistered owner vmiie dii'ectinfl a a condltion on the reaistered owner to a^-ipmi -' rs/'n—mss—i,oo,aoo. -^?Sgi ...^ afT^ff ^fit ^^i<ff OTI an^ff ihii'ii ^- •Da^ *ii*idr axnq» ^^T ^ww^, yifliy'Ko, fsidiyy .£'T^][:>.;...'IAA..:...^.'S.C'.^..I.^W[ 200 sil^r 'viv (ytii't'T) produce the accused who is abscoi^ding, in the opinion ofthis Court, is w'hoiiy rnisconceivea. i ne oraer 10 ine surrenoenng tne accuseG aiTv'er i unaerme law. The 'petitiori is therefore ai producing / surrendering the appiicant whiie'teieasing the vehici Aii otrier conditions in Ihe j the appilcarit. iowed to the exlent that the conditiori of accitsed driver shali not be imoosed on the fiifcillt iwyi)'^f ft^ <H>1^1< ^? gTfin aii^i extent wnicn irnposes tne conuition of ~i the Court is therefor®not sustainabie npugned order shaii be cornpiisd witri by Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ..<"' rfl.iss'fl'!! ai,"!;?";, i'a-i:<!TPI -'-FS'i47—2'20)U—!,00,a00.