BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT ORGANISED BY THE HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : SRI.P.G.THAMPI (SR.ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) & SMT.K.SREELATHA DEVI (RETD. DIST.JUDGE) TUESDAY THE 26TH OCTOBER 2010 / 4TH KARTHIKA 1932 RFA.No. 625 of 2008() --------------------- OS.83/1999 of SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA .................... IST DEFENDANT & ADDL DEFENDANTS 3 TO 5: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. N. SARADAMMA, D/O. NANIYAMMA, GOPALAKRISHNA MANDIRAM, PALLICKAL, NADUVILLA MURI, BHARANICKAVU VILLAGE. 2. NIRMALA, W/O. N. GOPALAKRISHNAN, RANI VILASAM, PALLICKAL, NADUVILA MURI, BHARANICKAVU VILLAGE. 3. RANI, D/O. N. GOPALAKRISHNAN, RANI VILASAM, PALLICKAL NADUVILLA MURI, BHARANICKAVU VILLAGE. 4. RUBI, D/O. N. GOPALAKRISHNAN, RANI VILASAM, PALLICKAL NADUVILLA MURI, BHARANICKAVU VILLAGE. BY ADV. MR.R.PARTHASARATHY RESPONDENT(S): PLAINTIFF: ---------------------------------------------- 1. SAMUEL THOMAS, JENESIS, KOONAMKULANGARA MURI, PATHIYOOR VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK. (DIED) ADDL. R2. MARY THOMAS, W/O. LATE SAMUEL THOMAS, AGED 68 YEARS, JENESIS, KOONAMKULANGARA MURI, PATHIYOOR VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK. R3. ELIZABATH THOMAS, D/O. LATE SAMUEL THOMAS, AGED 39 YEARS, JENESIS, KOONAMKULANGARA MURI, PATHIYOOR VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK. R4. MARIAMMA THOMAS, D/O. LATE SAMUEL THOMAS, AGED 38 YEARS, JENESIS, KOONAMKULANGARA MURI, PATHIYOOR VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK. R5. SAM THOMAS, S/O. LATE SAMUEL THOMAS, AGED 34 YEARS, JENESIS, KOONAMKULANGARA MURI, PATHIYOOR VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK. R6. MARTIN THOMAS, S/O. LATE SAMUEL THOMAS, AGED 28 YEARS, JENESIS, KOONAMKULANGARA MURI, PATHIYOOR VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK. ADV. MR.R.RAMADAS FOR R2 TO R6 THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR DETERMINATION BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT ON 26/10/2010, THE ADALAT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: SRI.P.G.THAMPI (SENIOR ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) AND SMT.K.SREELATHA DEVI (RETD. DISTRICT JUDGE) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.F.A NO. 625 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2010 A W A R D Both parties and their counsel are present. The appellants agreed to pay an amount of Rs.32,00,000/- (Rupees Thirty two lakhs only) in full and final satisfaction of the decree and this amount will be paid within a period of six months (on or before 25.04.2011) from today. In default, respondent is entitled to execute the decree. 2. The Ist appellant is no more and the remaining appellants are the legal representatives of the Ist appellant. Hence no other parties be impleaded. The 2nd appellant also filed a memo today, that she and remaining appellants are the legal heirs of the deceased. 3. Sole respondent is no more. His legal heirs are admitted to be the additional respondents 2 to 6. Mr.Benju Martin Thomas (6th respondent), is allowed to R.F.A.No.625/2008 2 represent additional respondents on the basis of the power of attorney in his favour. The attachment in force will continue till the amount is paid as agreed or the decree is executed. Refund court fee to the appellant Sd/- P.G.THAMPI (SENIOR ADVOCATE) Sd/- K.SREELATHA DEVI (RETD. DISTRICT JUDGE) ss/. //True Copy// P.A to Judge