IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. WRIT PETITION No.62oé [2005. PETITIONER Dhan Singh Yadav, S/o. Visheshar Yadav, Aged about- 35 years, R/o. Village- Mahmandpur Post— ‘Bargawa Vla- Akaltara D1str1ct— JanJgIr-Champa (C G) VERSUS ESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through z The Secretary, Water Resources Department,- D.K.S. Bhawan- Raipur (C.G.). State of Madhya Pradesh, Through : The Secretary, Water Resources Department, Vallabh Bhawan—Bhopal (M.P.). The Superintendent Engineer, Arpa Pariyojna Division- Sakri, Distriet- Bilaspur (C.G.). The EXecutive Engineer, Hasdeo Nahar, Jal Prabandh Shambhag, VAkaltara, District- Janjgir—Champa (C.G.). The Presiding Officer, Labour Court— Bilaspur, District— Bilaspur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 OF THE ' CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R XI—HC-22 m'W,mna WW u/w WW wwwwiwm ‘ mmmiw $31$q31¢2 13— 12—20% Shn' PK. Paid, coungel for tha patifionar. Shli Sandsap Dubey, Gevt. Advocatm for tha Siam. Heard. Leamed counsel for the State ‘aism an objection that the petitiOner has filecl ‘tm prcsant patitiGn directly against the O'dm‘ 0f thc labeur court Without approaching‘tha indumial court. Loamed counsel fox tho petitiomer submits that since the labour court has rajectsd the ctaim on tho ground of limitation, themfora, this patitioniiS tiled dil'actly bafore this Comt. ' Thore is no forco in the contention made bv thc leamed counsel for thc pctitioner. Th6 petitioner 1s requlrcd to movc thc mdustrlal court aoamst thc ordm of the labour court and talto tho gounds av'ulublc mo udmo that of lmutatlon In View of the above, learned Counsel for the petitloner wants to withdraw this petition with liberw to file the oetition bmore the industrial court. Let that be done as destred Accoidmglv this pet1t1on stands disposed of as Withdrawn Vith‘ the Iibexty aforesaid. l ’ ’ Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge [113% éfaét m i f