IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2233 of 2010 1. DHARMENDRA PRASAD S/O KUMAR NANDAN PRASAD R/O BIRLA MANDIR ROAD, P.S.- PIRBAHORE, DISTT.- PATNA 2. SEMIRAN BAKASHI S/O LATE ASHWINI KUMAR BAKSHI R/O SADAQUAT ASHRAM, KURJI, P.S.- PATLIPUTRA, PATNA 3. DIGAMBAR SINGH S/O LATE RAM PRAKASH SINGH R/O WEST LOHANIPUR, P.S. KADAM KUAN, DISTT.- PATNA 4. SUNIL KUMAR MAZUMDAR S/O LATE SHASTHI RANJAN MAZUMDAR, C/O GOPALJI JHA, RAJIVNAGAR R/O ROAD NO.- 4, P.S.- RAJIV NAGAR, PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPTT. GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE ADDL. FINANCE COMMISSIONER ( EXPENDITURE ), FINANCE DEPTT. GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE PATNA 5. THE TREASURY OFFICE, PATNA SECRETARIAT TREASURY SICHAI BHAWAN, PATNA 6. THE TREASURY OFFICER, PATNA SECRETARIAT TREASURY VIKAS BHAWAN, PATNA ----------- 2. 16.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners were employees of the Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation limited. The poor financial condition of the Corporation led to deputation of their services in different State Treasuries on specified terms and conditions. They seek protection of their pay upon absorption in the Treasury services based on revision of their pay scales that has been made in context of the admissible pay scale in the erstwhile Corporation. Strong reliance is placed on an order of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 6597 of 2009 at Annexure-6 giving 2 similar directions. Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents. Specific statement has been made to the following effect in Paragraphs 7, 8 and 9 reads as follows:- “ 7. That, it is relevant to mention here that so far petitioners are concerned their appointment through absorption has already been made by D.M. Patna vide Memo No. 114 dt. 20.07.2010 on the post of Clerk under Collectorate Clerical Cadre in pay scale 4000-6000 w.e.f. 08.03.2006. 8. That it is important to mention here as far as payment of revised pay and allowance during the period of deputation, Treasury Officers, Secretariat Treasury, Vikash Bhawan, Patna and Treasury Officers, Secretariat Treasury, Sichai Bhawan, Patna vide letter no. 380 dated 11.06.10 and letter no. 720 dated 20.07.10 respectively have informed that payment of arrears of pay allowances has been being made to petitioners as per direction contained in Annexure-7 of the writ petition. 9. That it has become crystal clear from the above stated paragraphs that the grievance of the petitioners have been redressed.” Once the respondents have themselves decided to grant relief in terms of similar orders passed by this Court in context of certain others similarly situated, there is no occasion for this Court to make a separate individual pronouncement with regard to the petitioners. The Court directs the respondents to 3 forthwith implement their statement made in the counter affidavit by payment of all consequential benefits in accordance with law within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. It shall be open for the petitioners to represent if they have any further grievances. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)