IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7285 of 2010 Date of Decision : October 18, 2011. The General Manager, Haryana Roadways, Chandigarh .....Petitioner versus Mastan Singh and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.D.Sharma, DAG, Haryana, for the petitioner. Mr.Suman Jain, Advocate, for respondent No.1. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 18.3.2009 (Annexure P-13) passed by Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, U.T. Chandigarh, under Section 33-C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, granting payment of over-time to respondent No.1 who is working as a driver in the Haryana Roadways. During the course of hearing, it could not be seriously disputed that the controversy has been answered in favour of the respondent-driver by a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.3.2011 passed in a bunch of LPAs including LPA No.858 of 2009 (General Manager, Haryana Roadways, Chandigarh versus Azad Singh and others). CWP No.7285 of 2010 [2] For the reasons assigned in the aforesaid decision in Azad Singh and others' case (supra), I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. Dismissed. 18.10.2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE