IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9681 of 2011 RAM PUKAR SINGH AND ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 25.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, informant and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 467, 468, 469, 471, 120B,323 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioners that they executed the sale deed with regard to the land of one Surya Mani Devi. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that 145 Cr. P.C. proceeding is going on between the parties. Furthermore, it appears from the complaint that the complaint has not been filed by the actual land holder Surya Mani Devi nor she has been made a witness in the complaint. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the informant that he is caretaker of the property of Surya Mani Devi hence, he filed the case. 2 Considering the nature of accusation and the fact that the actual land holder has not been made him a witness in the complaint, let the petitioners, Ram Pukar Singh, Poon Yadav and Ram Kishun Yadav, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Paraiya P.S. Case No. 44 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)