IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.10096 of 2005 Between: 1 M.K. Prasad, S/o. M.V.P. Mohan Rao, O/o. Tribal Welfare Engineering , Tribal Welfare Department, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District. 2 P.Venkateswarlu, S/o. P.Mallaiah, O/o. Tribal Welfare Engineering , Tribal Welfare Department, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District. .... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Project Officer, I.T.D.A, Bhadrachalam, Khammam Dist. 2 The Distict Collector and Chairman, I.T.D.A, Khammam, Khammam District. 3 The Executive Engineer, I.T.D.A, Bhadrachalam, Khammam Dist., 4 The Deputy Executive Engineer, Tribal Welfare Engineering Department, Sub - Division, Paloncha, Khammam Dist., ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records relating to and in connection with the O.A.No. 3820 /2004 on the file of the Hon'ble A.P. Administrative Tribunal and to declare that not passing any Interim Orders suspending the operation of the impugned orders No.M1/ITDA/2004, dated 16.5.2004 and not issuing any interim direction for continuation of the services of the Petitioners as highly arbitrary, illegal and consequentially to direct the respondents to continue the petitioners in service. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.P.V.RAMANA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court, at the admission stage, made the following: ORAL ORDER:- (PER GB, J) The only grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that though O.A. No.3820 of 2004 was admitted on 09.07.2004 and interim order is being pressed, so far no order has been passed. Therefore, the petitioner seeks appropriate direction. 2. We do not find any ground to interfere in the matter and suffice to say that the interim relief application has to be considered by one way or the other. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Tribunal to consider the interim relief and pass appropriate orders within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. _____________________ G. BIKSHAPATHY, J ___________________ P.S. NARAYANA, J Date: 28.04.2005 ES/NSR To 1 The Project Officer, I.T.D.A, Bhadrachalam, Khammam Dist. 2 The District Collector and Chairman, I.T.D.A, Khammam, Khammam District. 3 The Executive Engineer, I.T.D.A, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District. 4 The Deputy Executive Engineer, Tribal Welfare Engineering Department, Sub - Division, Paloncha, Khammam District. 5 2 CCs to the GP for Social Welfare, High Court buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 6 2 CD copies