IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 7TH AUGUST 2007 / 16TH SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 20629 of 2007(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ V.K.VIJAYAKUMAR, HOUSE NO.8/42, EYYAL, KANDANGODE, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE. 3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY G.P. SHRI.M.R.SABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ========================== W.P.(C).No.20629 of 2007 ========================== Dated this the 7th day of August, 2007 J U D G M E N T Petitioner's grievance is that pursuant to the application for variation of his stage carriage permit, the R.T.A. Kozhikkode, sought concurrence from the R.T.A., Ernakulam since the same is an inter district route. The grievance of the petitioner is that the R.T.A., Ernakulam is not issuing concurrence. The learned Government Pleader submits that a report has been called for and the request of the R.T.A., Kozhikkode, would be considered and orders passed on receipt of the report. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the third respondent to consider the request of the 1st respondent for concurrence and intimate its decision to the 1st respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge. 2