1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. Suit No.1481 of 1994 Smt.Janet Ram Mahadik & ors. .. .. Plaintiffs v/s. Mrs.Ratna Prabha Birje. .. .. Defendant Mr.J. Rego for Plaintiff No.2. Mr.C. Kapadia with Mr.Sreeji for Plff.Nos.3 to 5. ---- CORAM : SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J. Dated : 20 th August , 2008 P.C. : 1. Plaintiff No.2 makes an application for speaking to the Minutes of my order dated 17.7.2008. My order relates to one of the many properties left by the father of Plaintiff No.1 Ram Mahadik. The four children being Plaintiff Nos.2, 3, 4 and 5 are equally entitled to each of the properties left by their father. The relationship of the parties is admitted. Plaintiff No.2 now does not admit the equal share of the four children in the property dealt with under my order dated 17.7.2008. That situation is not in accordance with law. If there are four children, they all have an equal share in all the properties of the deceased, including the property dealt with under my order. Hence, my order needs no correction. [SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.]