y HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (Q No.56 of 2009 PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS: -Versus- 1. 2. 3. 4. Parasraia, S/o Dayaram Sahu, aged about 65 years, agriculturist, R/o Chendan, Baa Nawagon, Tah.: Dondi Lohara, Dist. Durg, at Present R/ o Dougargaou, Tah.: Dongargaon, Disuict Rajuajidgaon (CG) State of Chhattisgarh, fhrough Collector, Durg, Distdct Durg (CG) Superiiitending Engm.eer, Water Resource Departiiient, Shivnath Maiidal, Durg, District Durg (CG) Executive Engin.eer, Water Resoiirce Mohandipat Pariyojna, Dxirg Division, Ofilce at Kasaddili, Durg, District DVLTg (CG) Sub Divisional Officer, Matiamoti Nala C-anal, Watcr Resource, Sub-Division No.3, Sambalpur, Tah. Dondi Lohara, Distdct Durg (C-G) Present: Shri B.P. Gupta, counsel for fhe petition^r. Shri Arun Sao, Govt, Advocate for fhe State. Single Besieh: Hosx?ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra, J< ORAL^)RDER (Passed on 22-9-2009) 1. The petitioner has filed fhe rastant petition aad prayed for the following reMels:- "1. That the respondents be directed to decide aiid to pay the coBipensation to tlie petitiouer forfh with. 2. That aiiy oflier writ/order/direction, deeiii fit, ia the circuiastaiices of the case, niay also be passed ia favour of the petitioner. 3. To award fhe costw . 2. The respondents have filed fhe retura to fhe writ petition. They have also llled I<A. No.2 and prayed for graat of 8 weeks extra tinie for coxiipletm.g tiie land acqiusition proceednigs wifh respect to fhe property ia question. 3. Learaed counsel for tlie petitioner subiiiitted fhat ia view of tib-e affidavit filed by the respondents/State dated 18-9-2009, this petition inay be disposed ofwifh libeity to fhe petltioner to avadl appropriate reniedies available to tlie petitioner against aay award passed by flie respondents after conipletion of the acquisition proceediags. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed ofwith. liberty as prayed for. Bar^e Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge