WP(C) 4040/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI Heard Mr. DC Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Ms. BL Singh , learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 4. Hea rd also Mr. B Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, Health Department, for the re spondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 5. The petitioner’s father died-in-harness, on 25-12-1997, when the petitioner was minor. Though the petitioner’s mother applied for appointment on compassionate g round, she was, eventually, not appointed. The petitioner became major in the ye ar 2006 and, on the request made by the petitioner’s mother, the District Level Committee has forwarded the petitioner’s name to the State Level Committee for c onsideration for appointment on compassionate ground. The State Level Committee accordingly gave approval. While considering the present writ petition, it needs to be noted that the compa ssionate appointments are made and notified by office memorandum, dated 02-03-20 09. The petitioner does not, admittedly, fall within the parameters of the schem e framed for appointment on compassionate ground inasmuch as an application for appointment on compassionate ground shall be made within three months from the d ate of the death of the person, whose death gives rise to claim for appointment on compassionate ground. In the circumstances indicated hereinbefore, the petiti oner, not being eligible under the said scheme for appointment on compassionate ground, no order, in the nature of mandamus, can be issued, in this case, direct ing the petitioner’s case to be considered for appointment on compassionate grou nd. In view of the above, this writ petition is not admitted and shall accordingly s tand dismissed.