IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 13272 of 2009 Date of Decision: 28.8.2009. Ms. Meena Kumari and others --Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Gaurav Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) The petitioners got admission in the B.Ed regular course in the year 2007 on the basis of centralized counselling and were admitted to respondent no.4-college for the session 2007-08. It appears that respondent no.4 admitted the petitioners of its own without counselling. Respondent no.2 withheld the roll numbers of the petitioners at the time of annual examination. The petitioners accordingly filed a civil suit in the court of Civil Judge, Gurgaon and obtained an interim order allowing them to appear in the examination. The civil suit is still pending. Petitioners have filed this petition seeking a direction to respondents no.2 & 3 to declare the result of the petitioners. Since the petitioners are pursuing the course on the strength of the interim order passed by the Civil Judge, Gurgaon, it is not deemed appropriate to interfere in the exercise of the civil jurisdiction particularly when the civil suit is pending. In view of the above circumstances, the discretion to interfere is declined. The petitioners are at liberty to approach the civil court, where CWP. No. 13272 of 2009 -2- the matter is already pending for appropriate relief. However, it is observed that the civil court will expeditiously dispose of the matter keeping in view the nature of controversy. Petition dismissed. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 28.8.2009 lucky