FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2817 OF 2010. “Ganeshsing S/o. Prakashsingh Tahkur(Raghuwanshi) and another Vs/ The State of Maharashtra and others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. V.S. Bedre, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.K. Kadam, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM :- D.B. BHOSALE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 20th April, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2] By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for direction to respondent Nos. 1 to 3, to take appropriate action against respondent Nos. 4 and 5 in the light of the report submitted by the Director of Municipal Administration dated 3.8,2009. There is no dispute that on 15.9.2010, i.e. after filing of the present writ petition, respondent No.1 - State, has issued show cause notice to respondent Nos. 4 and 5 under Sections 55-A and 55-B of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Parishads and Industrial Townships Act, 1965. 3] Learned AGP submits that respondent No.1, will proceed ahead with the enquiry which they have initiated by issuing the show cause notice and conclude the same FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2817 OF 2010. “Ganeshsing S/o. Prakashsingh Tahkur(Raghuwanshi) and another Vs/ The State of Maharashtra and others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 expeditiously. 4] Having considered the prayers made in the writ petition and the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in our opinion, this petition stands worked out. Hence, the petition is disposed of. We, however, observe that respondent No.1 shall take the action initiated by issuing the show cause notice to its logical conclusion , as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of eight months, from the date of receipt of this order. 5] It is open to the petitioner to file compilation of documents, if he so desires, in support of the allegations made against of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 before the Enquiry Officer. 6] Petitioner is allowed to withdraw the amount of Rs. 20,000/- deposited in pursuance of the order dated 26th April, 2010. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] grt/-