A/ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTtSGARH AT BILASPUR MA. No. 108/2606 SB: Hon'bte Shri Justice R.L. Jhanwar APPELLANT (Originat Respondent No.2) RESPONDENT No.1 (Original applicant) Dhruv Garg, Partner ©arg K^idan, Bhjwapur. P.0. Chamba. P.S. XuKj Tahsil Umrer, Distriet Nagpur (Maharashtra). (Thls descriplaon is given as per statement made in apptic^ion filed before Commissioner for Workmans Compensation Act, Labour Court Rajnandgaon) (In fact, name of the Appellant is Shrl Durendra Kumar s/o Prabhudayat Garg, Age : 50 years, Occupation : Business r/o Dev Nagar Nagpur) Versus Shri Bhaiyalal s/o Vishramage 46yis. Occ: - R/o village Kaltu Vanjari, Tatiinet Dist: Rajnandgaon RESPONDENT No.2 (Ongina! applicant) Mantorabai w/o Bhyalal, age 40ym, R/o village kallu Vanjari, Tah & Dist , ' Rajnandagaon (CG) Y' RESPONDENT No.3 (Original respondent No.1) RESPONDENT No.4 Pawanji \^tmatjl, Parteiers Garg Khadan, R/o Bhiwapur P.O.:Chamba, P.S. Kuhi Tah: Umrer, Dist: Nagpur. CThis description is given s©pw statement made in onglnalapplication^ Commissioner, Workmen's Compensafion Act, Labour Court, ,; F Rajnandgaon APPEAL U/S 30 OF THE WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT Aopearance: None for the appetlant. None for the respondents. '^v ORAL ORDER (Of.iO^OIO) None appears for the appellant in the first round when ttie matter is called out for hearing. Even in the second round also none had appeared on behalf of the appellant. Since there is no representation on behaff of ttie appellant, thts Court Is left with no other option except to Glismiss the app^il for want of prc^ecuttoi'i. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want ofprosecution. | Sd/- R.L. Jhanwsir Judge