IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FA No.5 of 2006 ================================================ KUMAR AJAY Versus SMT. SANGITA KUMARI ================================================ Appearance: For the appellant: Mr Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate. =============================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER (Per : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2. 24.08.2010. This Appeal arises from the judgment and order dated 28.06.2005 passed by the Family Court, Patna in Matrimonial Case No. 131 of 2002. A Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 shall lie against the impugned judgment passed by the Family Court. Learned Advocate Mr Rajeev Ranjan, appearing for the appellant, seeks leave to convert this Appeal into a Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act. Leave is granted. The Appeal be converted into a Miscellaneous Appeal, as prayed for. Necessary corrections be carried out. Dilip ( R. M. Doshit, CJ) ( Jyoti Saran, J)