IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 3RD MARCH 2011 / 12TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 5011 of 2011(B) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- K.SAIFUDHEEN,S/O.ABDURAHIMAN, AGED 24 YEARS, LPSA (ARABIC)ALP SCHOOL,TOKKAMPARA,KOTTAKKAL P.O MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BY ADVS. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA SRI.C.P.SIVADASAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPT. OF GENERAL EDUCATION,GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1 3. MANAGER, SARADAVILASAM AUP SCHOOL,PAIKKALAM, PARIKKALAM P.O.,KANNUR-670605 4. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MALAPPURAM-676505 5. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, IRIKKUR, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670593 BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.5011 OF 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of March, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner seeks for a direction to dispose of Exhibits P16 and P17 revision petitions filed along with I.A.No.3366/2011. The petitioner is working as LPSA (Arabic) in the ALP School, Thokkampara. The above appointment as a Part Time Arabic Teacher was approved with effect from 14.07.2004. The petitioner claimed conversion of the post as Full Time Arabic Teacher. 2. Representations were filed in the matter but the Director of Public Instruction rejected the same as per Exhibit P2 order. During this period, a vacancy of LPSA (Arabic) arose in the ALP school, Thokkampara. The petitioner, therefore, requested for a posting there. The arrangement thought of was by inter management transfer. Exhibit P4 is the application. Accordingly, transfer was made as per Exhibit P5. The petitioner was joined as LPSA (Arabic) at ALP school, Thokkampara on 01.06.2009. W.P.(C) No.5011/2011 2 The said appointment was approved by the 4th respondent. 3. According to the petitioner, the Government, by Exhibit P7 order, lifted the ban imposed in effecting the appointment in aided schools with retrospective effect from 01.06.2007. Therefore, it is pointed out that the service rendered by the petitioner as Part Time Arabic Teacher has to be treated as Full Time Arabic Teacher with effect from 01.06.2007. Accordingly, the petitioner filed Exhibit P8 representation requesting the 5th respondent to treat the service rendered by the petitioner with effect from 01.06.2007 as Full Time Arabic Teacher. 4. Exhibit P9 is the proceedings subsequently issued by the 5th respondent directing the petitioner to submit the request through the 3rd respondent with all necessary certificates. It is stated that the 3rd respondent thereafter issued a memo of charges as per Exhibit P10 alleging that the petitioner was unauthorizedly absent from 01.06.2009 and Exhibit P11 is the explanation submitted by the petitioner. By Exhibit P13, finally the petitioner was terminated from service by the 3rd respondent. W.P.(C) No.5011/2011 3 Against Exhibits P9 and P13 orders, the petitioner filed a revision petition by Exhibit P14. 5. When the matter came up for admission on 17.02.2011, the learned counsel for the petitioner prayed for time for enabling his party to file separate revision petitions. Accordingly, Exhibits P16 and P17 revision petitions are stated to have been filed. Learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the revision petitions may be directed to be disposed of within a time frame. There will be a direction to the 1st respondent to take a decision on Exhibits P16 and P17 revision petitions within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition for compliance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp