FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 7186 OF 200 APPLICATION NO. 7186 OF 200 APPLICATION NO. 7186 OF 2005 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Mrs. P.H.Kantharia APP for applicant. None for the respsondent. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE,J. MHATRE,J. MHATRE,J. DTAED: DTAED: DTAED: 28TH AUGUST, 2006 28TH AUGUST, 2006 28TH AUGUST, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The order of acquittal recorded by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Jath is questioned by the application for leave. With the assistance of the learned APP, we have perused the impugned order. Cogent reasons have been given by the learned Judge in para 14 of the judgment for reaching to the conclusion of not guilty. Looking to the fact that it was basically a dispute between closed relations and proved enimity between the parties, absence of cogent evidence can be a sufficient ground for recording the order of acquittal. We therefore see no reason to interfere. Application is rejected. ...