Civil Revision No. 6424 of 2008 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6424 of 2008 Date of decision: 16.03.2009. Kartar Singh ...Petiitioner Versus Jallandhar Improvement Trust and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Parvez Akhtar, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The petitioner before this Court filed a plea under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. before the learned Trial Court for being impleaded as a party to the impugned cause. The plea, in the context, was that he had purchased the share of Gurdev Singh defendant therein, vide sale deeds dated 17.5.2007 and 14.6.2007. The learned Trial Court declined the plea by noticing that a preliminary decree between the original parties had already been granted in the year 1981 and further that the sale deeds aforementioned were alleged to have been executed during the pendency of the execution application which was pending for passing of final decree for the possession of the land in suit by way of partition. For the very reasons noticed by the learned Trial Court, I have no hesitation in affirming the view under challenge. Even at the cost of repetition, it may be noticed that a preliminary decree for partition had been passed between the original parties in the year 1981. The petitioner Civil Revision No. 6424 of 2008 -2- **** purchased a part of the land under reference vide sale deeds dated 17.5.2007 and 14.6.2007. The plea under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. came to be filed only thereafter. The reception of such a plea cannot be countenance by law. Dismissed in limine. March 16, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge