IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 13TH MARCH 2008 / 23RD PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 5105 of 2008(G) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- FATHIMA BEEVI, W/O.HANEEFA KUNJU, KOLLAYYATHU VEEDU, MULAVANA P.O. KUNDARA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM. 3. IQBAL, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNDARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNDARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 5. SUHARA BEEVI, D/O.AREEFA BEEVI, KOTTOOR PUTHEN VEEDU, KILIKOLLOOR P.O., KOLLAM. 6. AREEFA BEEVI, D/O.AREEFA BEEVI, KOTTOOR PUTHEN VEEDU, KILIKOLLOOR P.O., KOLLAM. 7. BASHEER KUTTY, SHERIN MANZIL, CHANDANATHOPPU P.O., KOLLAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.A. SALIM, ADV. SRI.DILEEP P.PILLAI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/03/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.5105/2008-G: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE PLAINT BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM ON 13/07/2007. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE PETITION BEFORE THE R.1. ON 08/02/2008. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R4.A: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT. EXT.R4.B: COPY OF THE DOCUMENT FROM THE S.R.O, SOORANADU. //TRUE COPY// prv. K.Balakrishnan Nair & P.N.Ravindran, JJ. ======================== W.P(C).No.5105 of 2008 ======================== Dated this the 13th day of March, 2008. JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair,J. The petitioner has approached this Court alleging that the police is harassing her. A statement has been filed on behalf of the police in which it is stated that the petitioner's son who is the husband of the fifth respondent is an accused in a crime registered by the police for the offence punishable under Section 498A of I.P.C. The informant in that case is the fourth respondent. The learned Government Pleader submitted that the police is only investigating into the crime in accordance with law. He denies the allegation of the petitioner that the police is harassing her. It is also submitted that they have no intention to harass the petitioner and they propose to proceed with the investigation only in accordance with law. This submission is recorded and the writ petition is closed. K.Balakrishnan Nair, Judge. P.N.Ravindran, Judge. ess 14/3