IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 141 of 2010 Date of Decision: 22.6.2011. Naresh Kumar …Petitioner Versus. Baldev Raj & Anr. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. Whether approved for Reporting? No. For the Petitioner Mr. Anoop Rattan, Advocate. For the Respondents. Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate. Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) 1. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed that action be taken against respondent No.1-Baldev Raj for willful disobedience of the orders of the Court. In separate proceedings being COPC No. 36 of 2011 notice was issued to respondent No.1 who has tendered his unconditional apology in that case. The respondent has also made a statement on oath that he has stopped dyeing business and is now selling cloth outside the shop and is not engaged in dyeing work. He also undertakes not to do 2 dyeing business outside his shop till the disposal of the main suit. 2. In view of the fact that respondent No.1-Baldev Raj has stopped doing work of dyeing business and has undertaken that he will not do the business of dyeing till the disposal of the main suit, the notice is discharged. The respondent-Baldev Raj is, however, warned that in case it is found that he has in any way violated the order of the Court, then stern action will be taken against him. No costs. ( Deepak Gupta), Judge. 22nd June, 2011. (Guleria)