CWP(T) No. 247/2008 10.08.2011 Present: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.1 Ms. Sunita Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3 Confidential reports received in a sealed cover from the learned counsel for the University stands perused, resealed and handed over back today itself. 2. It is the petitioner’s grievance that his representation stands rejected by the University without affording any reasons. He has also not been associated before the decision is taken. Respondent-University ought to have decided the petitioner’s representation by passing a speaking order. 3. Be that as it may be, as prayed for, liberty granted to the petitioner to file a fresh, detailed and exhaustive representation, annexing all documents in support of his contentions within a period of four weeks from today. As and when any such representation is received by the University, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, by the competent authority, after adverting to all the contentions raised by the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt thereof. Needless to add, before taking any decision, the authority shall associate all concerned, including the present petitioner and pass a reasoned order. 4. With the aforesaid observations, petition stands disposed off. Copy dasti. August 10, 2011 ( Sanjay Karol ), (rana) Judge.