1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 300 OF 2010 Hari Om Shrivastava. .... Petitioner. vs. Union of India & Ors. ..... Respondents. Mr. Pawan K. Pandey for the petitioner. Ms. Rajashree Surate i/by The Law Point for the respondents. CORAM : J.N. PATEL, ACTING, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 14TH JUNE, 2010. P.C. The petitioner has filed this petition impugning the departmental enquiry initiated by charge-sheet dated 19/28/03/2002. It is the case of the petitioner that he has retired and, therefore, the respondent no. 1 should be directed to release all pensionary benefits in favour of the petitioner apart from terminating the enquiry. 2. In our view, the petitioner being a central government servant, he can approach the Central Administrative Tribunal as the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by Section 14 of the Administrative 2 Tribunals Act, 1985 and the petitioner can very well agitate the issues and contentions raised in the petition. Therefore, we are not inclined to entertain this petition. The petition is dismissed with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal. (J.N. PATEL, ACTING, C.J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)