IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26480 of 2010 DHARI RAI @ JANAKDHARI RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.8.2010. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Gopalpur P.S.Case No.3 of 2010 for offence punishable under sections 135 of the Electricity Act, 2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner, with reference to the allegation as set out in the first information report and the seizure list appended thereto, submits that although the petitioner is alleged to be running his Flour Mill and Haller by illegally trapping the electricity, but perusal of the seizure list, does not show seizure of any item concerning Flour Mill or Haller. He submits that except the industrial motor of 5 HP and some wire, no other seizure was made from the place of the occurrence. He further submits that the petitioner is aged about 65 years, has a clean antecedent and has remained in custody since 24.3.2010. Taking into consideration the submissions 2 of the learned counsel for the petitioner, let petitioner Dhari Rai alias Janakdhari Rai be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Gopalpur P.S.Case No.3 of 2010, subject to the conditions that one of the close relative of the petitioner would stand as one of the bailors and who would file an affidavit indicating his genealogy with the petitioner and that the said bailor would be under a duty to duly inform the court below in case this petitioner is named or involved in any further case of similar nature and whereupon the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner on grounds of misuse. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)