IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13533 of 2008 1. INDIRA DEVI @ INDIRA SINGH, WIFE OF MANOJ KUMAR SINGH RESIDENT OF GAHMAR KOTHI, NAWADA, P.S. TOWN ARRAH, DISTRICT BHOJPUR. 2. MIRA DEVI @ MIRA SINGH, WIFE OF AMAR SHANKAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF SRI KRISHNA ROAD, BELAN BAZAR, P.S. KASIM BAZAR, DISTRICT MUNGER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 2.7.2010. On 29.6.2010, when the case was called out, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners and the case was adjourned for a day with an indication that no further adjournment shall be granted. Again on 1st July, 2010, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners. However, it was detected that in the daily cause list, name of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners was incorrectly typed as Sri Laxmi Narayan Jha in place of Laxmi Narayan Das. Accordingly, by order dated 1.7.2010, it was directed to correct the name of learned counsel for the petitioners. After correction of the name of learned counsel in the daily cause list, today again, none has appeared. Two petitioners, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, have prayed for quashing of order 2 N.H./ dated 28.1.2008 passed in Mahnar P.S. Case No.128 of 2005. By the said order, the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of offence under Sections 304B, 201 and 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code. I have perused the materials available on record as well as the impugned order. I do not find any defect in the order and, accordingly, the petition stands rejected. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)