IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD Second Appeal No.692 of 2008 and S.A.M.P. Nos.2883 and 2882 of 2011 Between: Vutchuru Sundeep Reddy and another .. Appellants/Petitioners AND Vutchuru Subba Reddy .. Respondent/Respondent COMMON JUDGMENT: S.A.M.P. No.2883 of 2011: Heard Sri A. Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri P. Sridhar Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent. The 1st appellant has become a major by efflux of time and accordingly he is declared as major discharging the 2nd appellant from guardianship. The petition is ordered accordingly. _____________________ G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J S.A.M.P. No.2882 of 2011: Appellants 1 and 2 and the respondent are present in person and they are identified by Sri A. Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri P. Sridhar Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent. The appellants and the respondent admitted the terms of compromise incorporated in the memorandum and desired the second appeal to be disposed of in terms of the compromise. Accordingly, this miscellaneous petition is allowed. _____________________ G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J S.A. No.692 of 2008: S.A.M.P. No.2882 of 2011 is allowed recording the memorandum of compromise between the parties on the appellants and the respondent present in person before the Court and identified by the learned counsel for the parties admitting the terms of the compromise. Accordingly, the second appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise. No costs. _____________________ G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J Date: 19-10-2011 Svv