IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14063 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 04, 2011 Hamir Singh @ Balbir Singh & others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Ajay Pal Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioners claim to be in possession of the disputed land on the basis of a mortgage done in favour of their predecessor- in-interest. Subsequently, the respondents have approached the Assistant Collector Ist Grade for mutation in their favour on the ground that they have purchased this land. The petitioners claim to have become owners of this land as the same has not been redeemed for the last 30 years. The Assistant Collector IInd Grade, adjourned the case sine-die as the matter was pending before the civil court in regard to the right of redemption. The said order was challenged before the Collector, who, however, has remanded the case back to Assistant Collector IInd Grade, to go on the spot and make the entries accordingly. This order has been upheld by the Commissioner. I do not see any reason to interfere in the impugned order. The approach is fair. The revenue entries are required to be made on the basis of actual possession. If the petitioners are in possession, then they need not fear. No case for interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction is made out. Dismissed. August 04, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE