1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 8 OF 2009 Lilabai Rajaram More & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus Vijay Dhondiram Kondke & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. P.B. Shah for the Petitioners Mr. K.V. Saste, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: JULY 23, 2009 P.C.:- It appears that there is some dispute between the parties, which has resulted in litigation. Some order has been passed by this Court earlier. According to the petitioners, that order concludes the dispute between the parties, and notice issued is in violation of the order. 2 2. We have not seen anything in the order of the High Court, which prohibits the public notice, even if it is untrue. There is no interference in the judicial process, as no process is pending in this Court. The Contempt Petition is misconceived. It is accordingly dismissed. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J.