¥ HIQH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT HLASPW DlVlSlON BENCH CORAM HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C J & HON’BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR $INHA J. Writ Appeal No 209 of 2008 Churaman Lal Sahu aged about 39 yaars S/o Late Shri Bhuvaniai Sahu, Rm Vlllage Mohlal Tahsnl Gundardahu District Dutg (C G ) Versus 1. State of Chhaltisgarh, Thmughr Secretary, Panchayat and social Services Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director Panchayat and Social Services, Raipur (C.G.) Deputy Director Panchayat and Sociai Services Durg, District— Durg (C.G.) MemoofWritA alU/SZ1 ofHih ounofc am arh Appeal to Divrsron Bench of the High Court oi Mhagggm Rules 2007 Present : Smt. Renu Kochar, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri N.K. Agrawal, learned Dy. AG for the respondents. APPELLA§T E ! ITIONER ORDER (22“ september, 2008) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Leamed counsel for the parties are heard on LA. No.01l2008, an application for condonation ofdelay in filing me writ appeal. 2. On due consideration, LA. Nam/2003 is allowed and the delay in tiling the writ appeal is hereby condoned. 3. Learned counsel for the parties are heard on admission. P subbu 4. Appellant Churaman Lal Sahu has filed this writ appeal against the impugned order dated 31-07-2008, passed i W.P.(S) No.41 51 I2008. 5. The appel!ant in his writ petition was seeking a direction to the respondents/authorities to grant him appointment on compassionate ground. 6. The appeiiant’s father retired from the post of Gram Sahayak on 31 -05-1995 and died thereafter on 05-08~1997. 7. As the appeiiant's father died after his retirement, the appeiiant is not entitled to compassionate appointment under the Rules/Scheme made in that behaif. 8.; We, therefore, do not find any infirmity in the impugned order whereby the appeiiant's writ petition has been dismissed. 9. The writ appeal, therefore, is iiabie to be dismissed and is n \hereby dismissed summarily. Sd/— 54/. Chief Justice l Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge i] Judge