IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7009 of 2010 DUKH HARAN PRASAD S/O LATE BUDDHU PASWAN R/O VILL.- MAKDUANY, P.S.- MANPUR, DISTT.- NALANDA, AT PRESENT MOHALLA- KHAIRABAD, P.S.- BIHARSHARIF, DISTT.- NALANDA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NALANDA 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT RAJ OFFICER, NALANDA 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER ISLAMPUR, NALANDA 5. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 2 23.04.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st May, 2008 from the post of Panchayat Sewak, Islampur Panchayat, District- Nalanda, his pension has not been settled with the result the petitioner is not receiving his pension as also some other dues on account of the salary. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.2. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable could also be paid to the petitioner along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)