''B"KB;?a-te*%^^;.i;;'.^:sf;3i^ 'u HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Coram: Hon' ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra, & Hon' ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar, JJ Petitioner Writ Petition No. 1917^)f2004 Manoranjan Poddar, s/o. Late Sri Maharaj Poddar, House No.B-24, Street No.5, Sector B, Panchseel Colony, Borsi, Durg, Chhattisgarh. Respondents, ;?^ -s^ Vs. 1. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Rehabilitation Division (Settlement) Jaisalmer House, New Delhi. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Raipur, Commissioner of Revenue Building, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgasrh. 3. The Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhilai, Range, Bhilai, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. 4. The Chairman, Central Administrative Tribunal, Civil Line, Jabalpur (Madhya Pradesh). (Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India.) Present: Shri Vaibhav ShuklaAdvocate appears on behalf of Shri P.S. Koshy, counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Fouzia Mirza, Asst. Solicitor General for Union of India. ORAL ORDER (Passedon8-12-2010) "Per Dhirendra.MLshra,_J. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that the instant writ petition has\been filed on the ground that in the matter of J.P. Shrivastava vs. Union of India, ' Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, in Original Application No.705/2004 had passed an order in favour of the applicant of that application and, therefore, the petitioner is also entitled ..jtS'as'i-g,,. •""•%, 'i ";^-y >1»J^' :iSsSS^,^ "=-'^^ Raju 2. J' for the same relief on the ground of parity. However, since then the order of the Tribunal in J.P. Shrivastava's case has already been set aside by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Writ Petition No. 8445 of 2006 (Union of India and another Vs. J.P.Shrivastava) vide order dated 31-1- 2008 and therefore nothing survives in this petition. In view of the above submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge