Crl. Writ Petition No. 690 of 2011 -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Writ Petition No. 690 of 2011 Date of Decision : 7.4.2011 Mukesh .......... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present : Mr. B.S. Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Sara, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr. Vijay Lath, Advocate **** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL) Vide order dated 17.3.2011, this Court directed the Deputy Commissioner, Ludhiana-respondent No.2 to enquire into the averments made in the petition and submit a report before this Court. In compliance with the said order affidavit of Sh. Rahul Tiwari, IAS, District Magistrate, Ludhiana has been filed in Court, wherein it has been stated that none of the persons, as mentioned in para 4 of the writ petition, were found either at the brick kiln or the site where the living quarters of the labourers are situated. As a matter of fact, all of them have already left the place of working at their own on 15.3.2011 after informing the Sh. Santosh Singh, Munshi and Sh. Goni, Jamadar. It has further been stated that no muscle man was seen Crl. Writ Petition No. 690 of 2011 -2- keeping any watch on any labour at the site of 'pather'. There was no boundary wall seen existing around the place of work and the labourers present there stated that a Doctor had been visiting the brick kiln to examine the labour whosoever desired so. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for a short adjournment to verify this aspect. In the light of the above facts, as mentioned in the petition, and has been referred to in this order, the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner can not be accepted. The Court is of the view that the present petition has been rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly. In case, the petitioner has any grouse he can again approach this Court by way of a fresh petition. 7.4.2011 (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) 'sp' JUDGE