1 cri appln 348.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 348 OF 2011 Mirza Nasim Baigh S/o Musa Baig .. Applicant Versus Dnyaneshwar @ Raju Madhukar Bhosikar.. Respondent Shri Pawankumar S. Agrawal, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri N. N. Shinde, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : S. S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 01ST MARCH, 2011. PER COURT : . Heard learned counsel for the applicant. This application is filed for restoration of Criminal Application No. 1413/2010. The counsel for the applicant invited my attention to the para 3 of the application and submitted that, for some personal reasons and emergent situation, the counsel for the applicant had to leave the Court. 2. On the other hand, the counsel for the respondent opposed the application and submitted this Court may not entertain the 2 cri appln 348.11 application. Upon hearing learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondent and upon perusal of contents of application and in particular para 3 of the application, in my opinion, the application deserves to be allowed. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause “B” and stands disposed of. The Criminal Application No. 1413/2010 is restored to its original file. The matter should be listed for hearing in due course. [S. S. SHINDE, J.] bsb/March. 11