(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7318 OF 2006 Samaj Sanshodhan & Sarvangin] Vikas Sanstha, Parbhani ] PETITIONERS. & another. ] VERSUS Union of India, ] Through Secretary, ] RESPONDENTS. Ministry of Human Resources ] Development Deptt., ] New Delhi and others. ] ----- Mr.A.M.Gaikwad,Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Alok Sharma,Standing Counsel,for respondent No.1. Mr.N.B.Patil, AGP, for respondent Nos.2 & 3. CORAM : Naresh H. Patil and N.D.Deshpande, JJ. DATE : 8th July, 2009. ORAL ORDER [ PER – NARESH H. PATIL, J.] 1] Heard. 2] The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been discriminated in providing central grants. Since the year 1995 petitioner is running a hostel and for the first time application was made for getting central (2) grants. The petitioner was refused the grant-in-aid; whereas the other institution similarly placed was provided with grant-in-aid. 3] Affidavit-in-reply is filed by respondent No.1. The learned counsel Shri.Alok Sharma, appearing for respondent No.1, submitted that the other institution which received the grant-in-aid was under a different scheme which is not the scheme under which the petitioner claims grant-in-aid. There is no discrimination made out. On merits, the petitioner’s case was considered and accordingly the decision was taken. 4] We have considered the submissions advanced, perused the affidavit in reply filed on record. We do not find that the decision taken by the authorities concerned is erroneous or discriminatory. Petitioner has failed to make out a case for causing interference in exercise of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. 5] Petition stands dismissed. [ N.D.Deshpande,J.] [ Naresh H. Patil,J.] pcr/o/wp7318.06