IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 17375 of 2005 Between: R.Venkata Subbaiah Gound S/o.Venkata Swamy M/s Lakshmi Narasimha Wines D.No.7-18, Korrapadu Raod, Proddatur Town, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Prohibition and excise Superintendent, Kadapa. 2 The Commissioner Prohibition and Excise Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad. 3 M/s new Veerabhadra Bar and Restaurant rep by its Licensee Sri G.Praveen Kumar Reddy S/o.not known d.No.7/22, 23 and 24, T.B.Road, Proddatur Town, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction mostly one which is in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 1 aznd 2 in taking appropriate action on the relpresentations submitted by the petitioner on 25.6.2005 with respect to the permission and license granted to the 3rd respondent as illegal, irregualr, direct the respondents 1 and 2 to cancel the license S.No.2/05-06 issued to the 3rd respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following Order: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.17375 of 2005 ORDER: The petitioner is resident of Proddatur town in Kadapa District. He alleges that ﬁrst respondent granted Form 2-B licence to third respondent against the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Excise (Grant of Licence of Selling by Bar and Conditions of Licence) Rules, 2005, and therefore, sought for cancellation of the same. He made a representation to that eﬀect on 25.06.2005, in vain. Therefore, he approached this Court. Even according to the petitioner the licence of third respondent expired in 2006. Therefore, nothing survives in the writ petition. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 03rd November, 2008 GHN To 1 The Prohibition and excise Superintendent, Kadapa. 2 The Commissioner Prohibition and Excise Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad. 3 M/s new Veerabhadra Bar and Restaurant rep by its Licensee Sri G.Praveen Kumar Reddy S/o.not known d.No.7/22, 23 and 24, T.B.Road, Proddatur Town, Kadapa District 4 2CCs to GP for Prohibition and Excise 5 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MPL}