CWP no. 4075 of 2010(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP no. 4075 of 2010(O&M) Decided on : 19-05-2011 Sony Kumari Sharma ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Ms. Nisha Thakur, Advocate for Mr. A.S.Gill,Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Salil Sagar, Addl. AG, Punjab Mr. R.S.Bajaj, Advocate for respondents no. 2 to 6 Mr. Dhiraj Chawla, Advocate for respondents no. 7 and 8 MAHESH GROVER, J The petitioner had approached this Court by making a grievance that she was being harassed by the respondents no. 7 and 8 and the respondents-University did not take any action. Mr. Bajaj, learned counsel for the University points out that in accordance with rules, the action has been initiated against the erring students and they were suspended and subsequently, an inquiry was held by the Anti Ragging Committee in which the petitioner failed to produce the sufficient material to establish her case. According to the UGC instructions an appeal is provided against the conclusion derived by the competent authority, which appeal is still pending and the petitioner is not associating herself with the proceedings. It has also been stated by Mr. Bajaj, learned CWP no. 4075 of 2010(O&M) 2 counsel for the University that the petitioner has since abandoned the course with the University and has taken admission elsewhere. On due consideration of the matter and keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has abandoned her course in the University and the matter is pending before the Appellate Authority, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the instant writ petition with observations that the petitioner if still aggrieved may pursue her remedy with the Appellate Authority and in case some grievance still survives after the decision of the Appellate Authority, she is at liberty to approach this Court. Disposed of in the aforesaid terms. May 19 , 2011 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge