In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CR No.2361 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on 02.5.2011. M/s.Ravindra Brothers through its Proprietor Surjit Singh Kaura -- Petitioner vs. Gujar Samaj Parishad,Chandigarh --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Amit Chopra, Advocate,for the petitioner Rakesh Kumar Jain, J, (Oral) CM No.9590-CII of 2011 Allowed as prayed for. CR No.2361 of 2011 After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for time to vacate the demised premises. It is submitted that the petitioner is in possession of the demised premises for the last 18 years and would need some time to find out alternate accommodation. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Since this revision petition is not argued on merits, the same is hereby dismissed. On the issue of grant of time, it would be suffice to mention that the learned Appellate Authority has passed the order on 07.8.2010 which was challenged by the petitioner by way CR No.2361 of 2011 -2- of Civil Revision No.7890 of 2010 which was dismissed by this Court on 09.3.2011 with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action. Further, the learned Appellate Authority had granted two months' time to the petitioner to vacate the demised premises which started from 07.8.2010. The petitioner is in possession of the demised premises for the last 18 years inspite of the fact that only two months' time was granted to vacate. However, keeping in the view the facts and circumstances of the case that the petitioner is in possession of the demised premises for the last 18 years, he is granted another three months' time to vacate the demised premises on or before 04.8.2011 subject to his filing an undertaking before the Rent Controller, Chandigarh in this regard and also by clearing all the arrears of rent due, if any. The petitioner shall also keep on paying the agreed rent for the ensuing months till he retains possession. In case of violation of any of the undertakings to be filed before the Rent Controller, he shall be held liable for contempt under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act,1971. 02.5.2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge