IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40499 of 2011 Raju Kumar Gupta, Son of late Mahabir Pd., R/o Mohalla Rajendra Path, Tel Bigha, P.S. Kotwali, District Gaya. -------Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar. 2.Smt. Alpana Devi @ Guddi, Wife of Sri Raju Kumar Gupta, D/o Sri Shiv Kumar Pd., R/o Mohalla Rajendra Path, Tel Bigha, P.S. Kotwali, District Gaya. At present residing at Bichali Gali, Khandakpur, P.O. Biharsharif, P.S. Bihar, District Nalanda. -----Opposite Parties ----------------- 02/- 15/12/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant-opposite party no. 2 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498(A), 323, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, is one of the named accused in this complaint case being husband of the complainant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. Submission is that petitioner is ready and willing to resume the matrimonial relationship with the complainant- opposite party no. 2, who is his one and only wife. There is positive response on behalf of complainant-opposite party no. 2 through counsel representing her. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of parties filing joint petition of compromise or petitioner files individual application before the court below stating such intention, in the event of his arrest/surrender within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharshariff, in connection with Complaint Case No. 157 (c) of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Further, additional condition, in the event of filing joint petition of compromise or individual petition on behalf of the petitioner, stating such intention, the court below on receipt of positive response from the complainant-opposite party no. 2 permit the couple to reside at their place of choice on the condition to report personally to the court below on the dates fixed for the purpose and only after being satisfied of their conduct for a reasonable period, the court below shall pass appropriate order in accordance with law. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)