IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 28172 of 2005 BETWEEN: P. Nageswara Sarma, S/o. Late P.V. Sunder Rao, R/o.No.6-157, Plot No.9, Sri Lalithanagar colony Jillelguda village, Hyderabad- 500079. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, P.S., Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad 2 The Assistant Commissioner, Santoshnagar, South Zone Hyderabad 3 Smt. E. Padma W/o. Late Narsimha, R/o. Lenin Nagar, Balapur X Roads, R.R. District 4 C. Danamma W/o. Abraham, R/o. Lenin Nagar, Balapur X Roads, R.R. District. 5 K. Sobha W/o. Yadaiah, R/o. Lenin Nagar, Balapur X Roads, R.R. District. 6 R. Sobha W/o. Yadaiah, R/o. Lenin Nagar, Balapur X Roads, R.R. District. 7 B. Padma W/o. Pentaiah, R/o. Lenin Nagar, Balapur X Roads, R.R. District. 8 E. Chennamma W/o. Late Advaiah, R/o. Lenin Nagar, Balapur X Roads, R.R. District. 9 A. Saradha W/o. Madhukar, R/o. House near Mandamallamma Function Hall Chempapet, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus by quashing the FIR No.148/05 on the file of P.S., Kanchanbagh, as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and being in gross abuse of process of law and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.VIJAYSEN REDDY Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: Petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus to quash the FIR.No.148 of 2005 on the file of Police Station Kanchanbagh, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Learned Government Pleader submits that the investigation has already completed and the police have filed a final report referring the matter as civil in nature. 3. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am of the opinion that nothing survives in the writ petition for adjudication. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J July 10, 2008 DSK