1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 5712/2010 (Hotel Jaiswal Khanaval VERSUS State of Maharashtra & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.M. Sharma h/f Shri Anand Parchure, counsel for the petitioner. Mrs. I.L. Bodade, A.G.P. for the R-1 & 2. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : JANUARY 25 , 2011 . By this petition, the petitioner impugns the order passed by the Collector, Washim on 15.11.2010, suspending the FL-III license of the petitioner for a period of thirty days. It appears that a period of thirty days has expired and the cause for filing this writ petition has been rendered infructuous. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the respondents have sealed the premises of the petitioner as a result of which the petitioner is not able to run his FL-III license in spite of the expiry of the period of thirty days, for which the license was suspended. Mrs. Bodade, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.1 and 2, on instructions from the respondent no.2, makes a statement that the shop of the petitioner is not sealed and the seal is already opened. 2 In view of the aforesaid position, since the license of the petitioner was suspended only for a period of thirty days and the period of thirty days has expired, the writ petition is disposed with no order as to costs. JUDGE APTE