-1 - c .^[° IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR 21^^> WRIT PETITION N0. /2006 PETITIONER (S) 1. \': •'s' .^^ .\^'j-"' y ?^ A ^.•' ^'^^y -c/y ^ RESPONDENT(S) / 2. VERSUS 1. State of cnattisgarh Through secretary water Resources Department Mantralay Bhawan Raipur, chhattisgarh Executive Engineer water Resources Division Chuikhadan District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarri Mahamantri Chhattisgam Jal sansacthan Majdoor Sangh, Banspara, Durg Distt Durg chhattisgarh /' 2. Presiding officer under ID Act LabourCourt -?a -2- camp court - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh /'' APPLICATION UNDER ART1CLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA k 1^^ ^ y^^^Hy-^/t?aai^^^''xs^i^ifi^.^sit^^w^^'fi^^ llBgmipwiaftaa^.1 ^.paa.^'^.^.'Qcg^CT^Sinc^'^ ..vasroqoiuafl.ai^ •'J: ."• : . .' • Srfais^xia^ae^^ ^3^ fa^^^^^ ^ ^reaA Sfaipwsu^iai^ ^^<8^^;Q^^ti8q}^^^^a^ .Bg pasi.iOM ;?pE^ sia^aQM^^i^;)Bi^^^^^;^ ^•SBV^^iat^^-^ae^Esaeio^Svtwm^fi.a^y-)^ ^''SQt^i'fi I^^^i33!^ 3P^ ;^^ o» pau^ur s^'i^^ ^agpCUl^ OTR a»%^3^1^^ ::':.,^;^.'sia^aM^sdaBdiK.^[i^{R l^,]HQI^(>aBH^B^^^1IOtSl:AI(l^:S3au|URS^^.^^ .|gi^:;^%n^K»M;^!^&^^ON:;^b»pBod^i|^^;^^qiB3^ ^^-..••.'^^^^ ^GsaoKwaiCK ^'iWvi^iWii^'WiSK ^np, iwy yaxncaQ ^Boaapv •SMUOtyt(ad 'Itt»U3B •Sl'O "1(8 NP 431BOOV -»iQOp6wlIiffis[IPesIreS !l^BlE®3?tI»UBtUUlt"W WSpoodsaa 811SJ3A j3q}oav%'q.(riha%BqT[;>.]OapB|S s-Eaacn^ad 90W£^09KWWf^'i& |llgi^|)g»|ii|dS^"!|^iin^^ ;<i»h— irM'i^ininiiiiwiiA*Mit'»«hh.iii•MiMnyhaww w!ia(SRR^i!Hwrewffi^KH»3Ra»na,wMaiEu^a<»^^ .i:':-n ^^^^•^!^'^Q^^^^^"^.i^<^^*^^^^^;^:^ VSilSSV^SSSS f^sMs^^sisa- •••"'^^SiS ^z^ '.:- > ^ The order of retrenchnuent was accotdingly declared as iavalid and iaapioper. As a result, fhc petitioners wcre directed to reanstate the workers wifhout back wages as admittcdty, tfae worteis were cmployed else where gainfulty. The pctitioner has prefencd, fhis petition fited underArtfcle 827 of the Constitution of India chaBengmg the unpugaed award datcd 5.7.2005 passed by the Labour Court in the Case No. 14/ID Act/2001/Rcf. Leamed counsel appeaiing for the petitroncr chaUeagps fhe order on fhc ground fhat tbe provisions ofSection 17-B has been coinplied wifh. No enor on fhe feice of thc rccord or any inegiilarily or pcrversity has been pointed out in the impugned award. In cirercise of jurisdiction under Articte 227 of thc Constitution of India, tfais Coiut has liauted scopc to entertaia fhis petition and it does not warrant any iaterference with the nnpiigaed oider. AccoTdingIy, ths petition fe dismfascd at adnalssioa stage sununarily. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge t^>' ^