2) in te body of the pet§tion the pet§tioner has stated that he is h questioning the propriety and appointment of one Dr; R.P. Sharma in the hospital at Thankhamhariya 'on attachment basis for the last 1-6 years. 3) ‘ The petitioner seeks the following reliefs in this Public lnterest Litigation ("PIL" for short) : i) to issue a direction to the respondents that Dr R P Sharma be transferred from Government Hospital/Healthy Qentre/ Maternity Home Thankhamhanya and a lady Doctor be appomted there. for handing over the enquiry to CBI in view of the laxity of the Police Officers in funding out the causerof death of one Smt. Ankalahin Bai @ Chirayee, Wfo Roopoo. iii) for payment of compensation to the tune of Rs.2,00,000/-. 4) A perusal of the pleadings and the relief sought for by the petitioner in this writ petition would clearly demonstrate that the petition so filed is not in the public interest but to espouse the cause of a particular person, that only means it is not a Public Interest Litigation, but a Private Interest Litigation at the behestof some third person. This sort of litigations should not be entertained in View of the number of decisions of the Apex Court. “ln that View of the matter, we do not y entertain this writ petition. Accordingly the petition is rejected. However, liberty is reserved to the citizens of the area to approach this Couriif they have any grievance. Ordered according/’2,s ‘ ~ // va J dge l Sd/- Vuay Kumar Shnvasta \\r _ Sd/— ' Chief.Iustice /