IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (S) N0.^/9^ ?/2007 PETITIONER Mirza Maqsood Baigyjb wr^chw^eleV,^le^'^. tf^felvvf, \oy ."»• ^ A'- .<*" »sy'y RESPONDENTS Working as Accountant I'n the office of Assistant Commissioner Adivasi Development Department Durg, Resident of Room No. 108, Near Joshi Advocate Mohan Nagar, Dlstrict Durg (C.G.) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Department of Adim Jati & Other Back Word Class, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt-Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Adim Jati Development Department Durg (C.G.) '> 3. ^ Assistant Commissioner Adim Jati Development department Durg (C.G.) 4.'Principal, CaO^ft. ^ Higher Secondary School, Chikhalkasa, Durg (C.G.) 5. ''Collector, DurgfC.G.) 6. Shri P.L.Sahu, Accountant Govt. Higher Secondary School, Chikhalkasa, Durg (C.G.) t^- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/*8T OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMOS, PROHIBITION AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, ORDER OR OMjERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS ^^ P-- & HSGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Sinaie Bench : Hon'bJe Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker Kre PETITIONER Writ Petition <S) No. 4963 of2007 Mirza Maqsood Baia RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisaarh & others Mrs. Fouzia Mirza, Advocate vrith Ms Farah Minhaj Advocatc for ths pGtltiOncr. Mr. An/ind Dubev, PaneS Lawver for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 228 OF THE COILJSTSTUTiON OF !NDiA ORDER (07.07.2009) With the consent ofthe parties, the matteris heard finally. Challenae in the instant writ petitlon is to the order dated 22.7.2007 (Annexure-P-1) passed by respondent No. 5 whereby the petitioner was transferred from the office of Assistant Commlssioner; Adim Jati Development Durg to Govt- Higher Secondary School, Chikhalkasa, in vioiation of the transfer policy. This Court entertaining the grievance of the petitioner had granted stav in his favour vide order dated 29.9-2007. In view of the fac.t that this petition was fiied on 10.8.2007 and stav was aiso aranted in favour of the petltioner, the transfer order, so far as it relates to the petitioner is hereby quashed. However, the State Government would be at libertv to oass an order if the admlnistrath/e exiaency so warrant. With the above observation; the petition stands disposed of. ' ^ 'n'lnepell[lonslanasalsposeu^^ j^ ^v ^^