IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.461 of 2004 Lalti Kumari wife of Sri Anandi Ram Jardan, resident of village Belma, P.S. Tekari, P.O. Dharamsala, District Gaya – Appellant. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Collector, Gaya. 3. The Deputy Director of Welfare, Magadh Division, Gaya. 4. The District Planning Officer, Gaya. 5. The Child Development Project Officer, Tekari Block, Gaya. 6. Smt. Usha Kumari wife of Ajay Yadav, resident of village- Belma, P.S. Tekari, P.O. Dharamsala, District Gaya. --- Respondents. ----------- 4/ 22-09-2010 Heard Mr. Suraj Narayan Yadav for the appellant, and Mr. Abinash Kumar, learned Assistant Counsel to Government Pleader No.1. This appeal under Clause-10 of the letters Patent of the High Court of Judicature at Patna has been preferred by the petitioner of C.W.J.C. No.10427 if 2003, and is aggrieved by the order dated 10.03.2004, whereby the writ petition has been dismissed, and the selection of respondent no.6 (Smt. Usha Kumari) as Anganbari Sewika has been upheld. We have perused the materials on record, and considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. The appellant claims to have been selected as Anganbari Sewika at the meeting of the General Body of the Gram Panchayat held on 15.03.2003. Further case of the appellant is that announcement of the result of her appointment was followed by a pandemonium, as a result 2 of which the members of the general body cancelled the appellant’s selection, and instead selected respondent no.6. On a perusal of the materials on record, the learned Single Judge found as an issue of fact that the appellant was never selected and, therefore, the writ petition was dismissed. It is an issue concluded by the facts arrived at by the learned Single Judge. We do not find any merit in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed. BTiwary/ ( S. K. Katriar, J.) ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)