^-i- ^ •%• ^- -^'. ^d50^ S.B. (Service Matteri IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATHS6ARH) WRIT PETmON N03837/2006. PETITIONER: ^ .\-.i^... 3^;^y>-"" ,'V[.-t" ^••" ;-"".<?L^.-""- ,•; A\; ft ,&••" ^•r Respondents Biseha Ram Chedaiha, Son of Shri Ganesh Ram Chedaiha, aged about 47 years, residence of village Jano, Post 'T'arpodi, Tahsil Saja, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS 1. State of Chhatdsgarh, Through The Secretary School Eklucation Department Ministry D.K-S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director of School Education Office, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. The District Educadon Officer, Bemetara, Through Block Development Mucation Of&cer, Saja, Dui^, Chhatdsgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTtCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrrUTlON OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRTT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CER'HORARI. PROHIBmON AND FOR THE OTHER SIMILAR WRTT OR WRTTS. ORDER OR ORDERS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIQNS. ^ ^? XI-HC-78 *11+1MI StKllch 3^'-qpn?pr, ^•y'Ko, (sicii+iy ...^^..3^.?.7L^. ^ 200 3n^?T 'ra^i' (yld'a^) sn^rw Vw* craT3[I^?Tst"lich TmHf?!r 3ii^T chi<<tyi41-i wraf if te^ <Ri«i< ^ari^iTsn^r Heard Shri O.P. Sahu, couns41 for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bqjcy, 6.A. for fhe respondents, on advance copy. By this petition, the petition^r has prayed that respondents be directed to grant two odvance increments to the B.Ed. examination on his own ex| The case of the petitione| Teacher in the year 1986. As perl erstwhile Stote of M.P. the Assi^tant Teochers who have passed the B.Ed. examination before 22.10.1964 we teachers who have passed the B.Ed expenses are a!so entitled for two <\ persons have moved an apptication Bench at Raipur, the Tribunal has Ed. exomination on his own expei repr-esentation made by him simitar Therefore, learned counsri petitioner may be allowed to maki No.3 and in turn, he be directed to| which Shr-i Bajqj, learned &ovt. Advi the petitioner, as the petitioner has passed benses. \~ is that he was appointed os Assistant Instructions dated 24-12-1998 issued by intitled for two advance incr'ements and the examination after 22.10.1964 on their own dvance in&rements. Other similarly situated before the State Administrotive Tribunai, granted relief to them and based on that they hove been gr'anted two advanc|e increments. The petitioner had passed B. ises in the yea- 1994-95 and inspite of treatment is not being given to him. 1 for the petitioner' submits that the i a detailed representation to respondent decide the some in accordance w'rth law, to >cate for the State has no objection. Having heard learned counse for the parties, having regard to the facts cnd circumstances of tha case, w»itl|ioutexpressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the petitioner- is altowed 1^o make a detailed representation alon9 with copy of this petition raisir^ all h s grievonces to respondent No.3 within a P.T.O. '2.1. } XI-HC-78 S^airaraq', aTflu'is, !a|cll'M^< *11*1^1SlH19i WT 200 3n^?Tcracf? ((pf^sf^sr) an^Twf^-ira? cT^TT 3TT??T ^TT^ Roshan STaTCK;ETf?(r3TI^T .•2- tlke period of 15 days from today an^ examine the case of the petition4r petitioner in this petition and in reaches to the conclusion that siiti benefit of two advance incr-ements grant of two advance increments pass orders within a period of 3 mo^iths With the direction afor-esaicl Partias are entitled for certl oh ^rafeNN-wicff ff tecA tfSRsre ^arf^TSll^T ^ in turn, respondent No.3 \s directed to in the light of averments made by the representation also. If respondent No.3 lilarly situated persons have been ycnied and the petitioner's case is also covered for the basis of 6overnment's order, then to from todey, in accordance with low. , the petition stands disposed of. fied copy of this order. Srii- 1 .C. BWaoo iie ^f db ^: P.T.O.