IN_ TMEMJUDhTA PR^JDESH ADMINISTRATI^TE TRIBUNAL BENCH RAIPUR O.A. N0. 'Sl OF 1999 ^^^^^/0< APPLICAt7T 'f .,k .^ 1 1 i: fi 1» Shivlal Divakar s/o Shri Mukhau Ram Divakar aged 28 yea.rs Village Mandhar (Kala) P.0. Motenga Via Simga Distt. Rair^r 2» Rikhiram Devangan s/o Shri Dashrath Devangan aged 30 years Village Kirvai P»0» Dajmakhedra Tahsil Simga Distt. Raipur^ 3» Sajjanlal s/o Shri Lakhanlal aged 30 years Village Bamnidih P.0. Vishrampur Via Simga Distt- Rair?ur» 4^ Bhola Prasad s/o Shri Hangala aged 28 years Village Kolihya- Post Kolihya Via Simga Distt<. Raipur 5. GajanarxaPrasad Verma s/o Shri Santrarn Verma aged 30 years Village Kesda Post Kesda Via Simga Distt. Raipur. 6< Radheshyam Verma s/o Shri Keju Ram Verma aged 29 years Village Mohbhata Post Mohbhata Via Simga Distt^ Raipur All Mansevi Sahayak Sikshak previously appointed after due selection and eligible oigainst vacant post of Asstt* Teacher< VERSUS RESPONDENTS l.t^^€^> ' lo State of Madhya Pradesh through Principal Secretary School Education Department Mantralaya Bhopal 2^ Commissioner Efiucation and Director of Public Instructions Madhya Pradesh Bhopal 3« Joint Director of Public Instruction Education Distto Raipur Division Raipur 4^ Deputy Director of Public Instruction Education District Raipur Division Raipur 5<» BlocK Education Officer School Education Department Block Simga Distt< Raipyur 6^ Block Education Officer School Education Departnient Block Mahasun'iund 2 —a- 2 — 7. Deputy Director of Public Instruction Distt* Mahasui Division Ral£)ur APPLICATION U/S 19 OF THE ADMINISTR&TIVE TRIBUNAL ACT 1985. XI-HC—78 W^^W^^K "3^ ^TPTI^R^ ^ftTFR', 'f^<rl!^<j,< . ^,U^)^2-w[°.r'l ^qNT:"-'"v;u"'"'---"-"'-1"""-"^200 sn^T ^w (^di^^) BTI^T^TN^ ^P4T3:H^I'^RN ^TTW^^T^iT^T <^l^?<r1^1'iTllH<'lT^ h^€\<n»i^i< ^T 3-tfifH ^it^ Tumane SB : Hon'bte Shri Manindra Mohan Shrtvastava. J. n.o -/^20MO When the matter was calted fo ipetitioner/s and the matter was passed o^ jappears forthe petitioner/s. Shri^^i^?L^-for the; Earlier S.P.C. was issued tothe | Since no one appears for the p< |nade on his/their behalf, the petition is dii hearing, none appeared for the ?r. Even in the second round, none ' Sfrate. p^titioner/s. ttitioner/s and no representation is ^missed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Jude ..]-.„...-