Crl. Misc. No. M-36203 of 2009 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-36203 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: 20.1.2010 Narender Kumar Tandan ..........Petitioner Versus Chajju Ram & Anr. ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Sanskar Kundu, Advocate for the petitioner. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the impugned order dated 15.5.2009 (Annexure P- 2) as well as judgment dated 26.9.2009 (Annexure P-3) passed by Learned Sessions Judge, Jind. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the impugned orders have been passed without considering the contents of the complaint and statement of the complainant and other witnesses. Learned counsel for the petitioner also relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble the Apex Court in Rukhmini Narvekar Vs. Vijaya Satardekar & Ors. 2008 (4) RCR (Criminal) 924. I have heard the arguments of counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the impugned orders. From the perusal of the impugned orders, it is clear that the complainant has already filed a civil suit regarding the matter in dispute and Crl. Misc. No. M-36203 of 2009 (2) the same is pending before the civil Court. The complaint was also sent to the Police to inquire into the matter under Section 202 Cr.P.C. Since the matter is of civil nature and the civil suit is already pending between the parties, no ground is made out to interfere in the impugned orders. The judgment relied upon by the petitioner is also not applicable as there is no evidence on record to summon respondent No.1. Petition stands dismissed accordingly. January 20, 2010 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE