IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30905 of 2008 RAMASHISH YADAV & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.8.2008 Heard. The petitioners were identified and named in the F.I.R. in a case under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant and his companions were robbed of their cash and ornaments as per description in the written report. The contention is that the written report was presented after two days of the occurrence and that the petitioners were not caught at the spot. There is no valid explanation given in the report that not only the petitioners had committed offence but they had also terrified the informant and his guardians. Regard being had to the fact that petitioners are named in the F.I.R. and the rejection order indicates that other persons also identified them, I am not inclined to direct release of the petitioner from custody. The petition is dismissed. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )