IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINTIAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 1030 of 2008 With Stay Application No.8795/2008 Maruf & others. …………. Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and another. ……… Respondents Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent no.1. None for respondent no.2. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent no.1. None for respondent no.2. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. On due consideration of the submission of the learned counsel for the parties, the contents of the F.I.R.; the averments made in the F.I.R. against the present petitioners; the fact that the F.I.R. prima facie discloses a cognizable offence; and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any good ground to grant relief to the petitioners as claimed in the petition. However, I am refraining form commenting on the merits of the case lest it may adversely affect the petitioner’s case at the trial which is yet to start. 4. Thus, the petition and the relief sought in this petition liable to be dismissed and are hereby dismissed summarily. Consequently, the Stay application is also dismissed. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 23.12.2008 V.K.