IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.-T- No. 89 of 2009. Decided on 21.02.2011. _____________________________________________________ N.R. Chauhan. …Petitioners. -Versus- Himachal Pradesh Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes Development Corporation and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate. For respondent No. 1. : Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate. For respondent No. 2. : Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate vice Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge: Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Consequently, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending applications, if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge February 21, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.