IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23560 of 2010 SANTOSH RAI @ SANTOSH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 03.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 498(A),323 of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the D. P. Act. The petitioner is ready to resume conjugal life whereas the impugned order suggests that the wife also expressed her willingness provided the petitioner takes her from her parents’ house and executes a bond. Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. I do not think he requires to execute any bond. However, the petitioner undertakes to go to the complainant’s house within a period of three weeks from today and take her to her matrimonial home. Considering the aforesaid undertaking, let the petitioner, Santosh Rai @ Santosh Kumar be released on bail in the event of his arrest 2 or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. C1- No. 714 of 2009, Tr. No. 2810 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. If the petitioner fails to comply the undertaking given before this court then the complainant will be at liberty to file proper application. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)