IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4734 (MS) OF 2001 Ram Swaroop ………Petitioner. Versus Tehsildar and others. ……………Respondents. None appears for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 and 2. None appears for respondent no.3. 13th August, 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. None appears for petitioner as well as for respondent no. 3 though called out twice. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no. 1 and 2 is present. Writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Even otherwise, there is no merit in the writ petition as the impugned order dated 29.3.193 has been passed by the Tehsildar, which is appealable under the land laws. (P.C. Verma, J.) 13.8.2008 Rathour