Civil Writ Petition No. 4315 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 4315 of 2010 Date of decision: 29.03.2011 Renu Kahol & another .....Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana & others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Puneet Bali, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Shruti Jain, AAG, Haryana for the State. Mr. Siddharath Batra, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 to 4. Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.5. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. After hearing counsel for the parties, the Court had passed the following order on January 12, 2011:- “Counsel for the parties have been heard at some length. The situation leading to cancellation of plot, which was duly transferred on the name of the petitioner, apparently is misdoing of the respondent/HUDA. Obviously, HUDA is not acting fairly in cancelling the plot on the ground that the Consumer Forum has passed some order. That order appears to have been obtained without disclosing the complete fact Civil Writ Petition No. 4315 of 2010 -2- that third party right has come into existence by the time the original allottee approached the Consumer Forum. The allottees are normal citizens and should not be harassed in this manner. HUDA is meant to help people and should not be seen acting in this manner. Let the respondents have instructions to rectify the situation in an appropriate and legal manner.” Today, counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4 has placed before me a copy of the Email received by him showing that the competent authority has withdrawn the cancellation order. The writ petition is, therefore, rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. Let the formal communication be forwarded to the petitioner in this regard. March 29, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE