.--^~) Y. 4 i IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (C) N0. <^^S\ /2010 PETITIONER ^ ...^ ^'v ^%^ ^ \' \ A^-^ ^p- ft^ ^y^' ^"" \^ RESPONDENT VERSUS 2. 3. 4. Rajesh Pratap Singh S/o. Late Chandikeshwar Pratap Singh, aged about 40 years, R/o. Village - Shivprasad Nagar, Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through- The Secretary, Public Works Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G. The Collector, Ambikapur, Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) The Executive Engineer, P.W.D. Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) The Sub-divisional, officer Surajpur, Distt. Surguja •L WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA w HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (0 No. 2891of 20 10 PETITIONER : Rajesh Pratap Singh. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri, J. Present: Shri P.K.Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Govemment Advocate with.Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 16th day of November, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made a representation through his counsel on 30.03.2010 (Annexure P/4) stating that the land has been taken over by the State Govemment, without paying any compensation. Nothing has been done in his representation till date, though it is well settled principle of law that if a representation is made, the same should be considered asexpeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 3-6 months. More than six months have passed but no decision has been taken. Shri Patel further submits that the petitioner is not pressing the reliefclause No. 1, at this stage. 2. Shri Bhatia, leamed Deputy GQvemment Advocate appearing with Shri N.N.Roy, leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that the representation, as stated above, shall be considered and decided by the respondent authorities in accordance with law, on its own merits and perspective, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period offour weeks. 3. In view ofthe foregoing, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication at this stage. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. \ SatishK.Agnihotn \ Judge Amit