ee 2\\ Q'jéid’éiléégxg %\. WW g‘ .“a m“ (m‘wm ....... \ 0/\ N %) 1 @ $INGLE 3E‘NCH WRIT PETITION (s) NoS9é, /2011 / Leelaram Anchal, Aged about 41 years, S/o— Late Dhanwaram Anchal, Presently working as Health Worker, Sub-Heath Centre~Gidhpuri, Block~Masturi, Distt.—Bi1aspur, C.G. PETITIONER Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Through—Secretary, Departmen't of Health wd Family Welfare, D.K.S. BhaWan, Mantralaya, Raipur, C.G. Collector, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur, C.G. Chief Medical & Health Officer, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur, C.G. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT (S) IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS etc. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 20 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETlTlONJS) NO.5961 OF 2011 (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State. a, ORDER (Passed on this 30‘ day of September, 201 1) 1. Heard learne’tl counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that under the transfer policy the transfer can be made either on the basis of complaint or on the proposal made by the concerned Department. ln the case on hand, neither a complaint is trade nor a proposal has been sent by the concerned Department i.e. Department of Health & Family Welfare, as is evident from Annexure — P/5. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that if the transfer policy has not been followed, as aforestated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the same shall be examined and fresh order shall be , passed in accordance with law, if the impugned order has not been given effect, no effect shalt be given to the impugned order dated 157-2011 (Annexure — P/1), tilt then. 4. ln view of the above, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner nothing survives'in this petition for adjudication. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. ’////:/: Gowri ) PETlTiONER Leelaram Anchal Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others