IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3126 of 2006 MADAN MOHAN PRASAD SINGH SON OF RAJDEO SINGH H/O- M.C.S. THAKUR SHIVPURI, POST – BORING ROAD, P.S. KRISHNAPURI, PATNA Versus 1. THE M.D.,BHARAT WAGEON ENGINERING AND COMPANY LTD. “C” BLOCK 5TH FLOOR MAURYALOK COMPLEX, DAK BUNGLOW ROAD, PATNA – 800001. 2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY, BHARAT WAGON ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD. “C” BLOCK 5TH FLOOR MAURYALOK COMPLEX DAK BUNGLOW ROAD, PATNA 800001. 3. THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY HEAVY INDUSTRY DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA NEW DELHI. 4. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, BIHAR EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND BUILDING ROAD NO. 6 R – BLOCK, PATNA. 5. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, BIHAR EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND BUILDING, ROAD NO. 6 R BLOCK, PATNA – 800001. 6. THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER OFFICE, RAJENDRA JAWAN BHAWAN, C&D BLOCK, MAIN ROAD, RANCHI - 834001 ----------- 05. 21.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Udayan Choudhary, learned counsel appearing for the Bharat Wagon Engineering and Company Ltd. and respondent nos. 4 to 6 are represented by the Surj Bansh Roy. The grievance of the petitioner is that 2 petitioner retired from the service of Bharat Wagon Engineering and Company Ltd. on 30th of November 2000 under the scheme of voluntary retirement scheme which was accepted by the respondent nos. 1 and 2. However, the small claim of his traveling allowance under the VRS from the place of office to the place of his settlement after VRS has not been paid. Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 submits that since the petitioner did not complete the necessary formality including the submission of railway tickets as per the company rules the aforesaid claim could not be settled. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in order to get the aforesaid claim petitioner shall complete the necessary formalities and also submits railway tickets for claiming the traveling allowance. In case petitioner approaches the respondent no. 1 and completes the necessary formalities within a period of one month, the claim of the petitioner be considered as per the VRS scheme expeditiously preferably within a period of four months. As regards the claims for provident fund dues, petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of payment of the aforesaid amount petitioner would be presenting the application in the prescribed form before 3 the respondent no. 1 for its eventual endorsement and sending it to the respondent no. 4 for its ownward process. Petitioner shall take the aforesaid steps within a period of four weeks. On acceptance of such application it is expected that the application of the petitioner would be forwarded to respondent no. 6 within a period of another four weeks. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)