IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16000 of 2011 KAPIL TANTI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the agnate of the informant is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 364, 307, 324/120B of the Indian Penal Code. The informant’s grand son Amarjeet Kumar was abducted and subsequently he was found in injured condition. The occurrence is of 29.12.2010 whereas 164 Cr. P.C. statement was recorded on 22.01.2011 where it is specifically alleged that Narayan Tanti and some unknown persons who happens to be the parental brother of the victim took the victim and made assault. It is alleged against this petitioner that he alongwith one Pappu Pandit threw away the victim when the main accused persons fled away. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that earlier also two cases were lodged by the informant against the petitioner which were found 2 false. It is submitted that since the petitioner purchased some land from Smt. Dhaneshwari Devi which was sold by elder brother of the informant to Smt. Dhaneshwari Devi hence, the case has been lodged. Though title suit is also going on between the parties. Considering the fact that 164 Cr. P.C. statement was recorded almost a month after return of the victim boy and litigating terms between the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 350 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Jamui, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)