-^' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Coram; Hon' ble Shri T.P. Sharma & Hon' ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar, JJ Appellant Claimant M.A.(C1 No. 33 of 2009 1) Dukhit Ram Paikra, aged about 45 years, S/o. Shri Vishram Paikra, R/o. Village Latuwa, Teh. Baloda Bazar, Raipur, Dist. CG State. 2) Durpati, V/o. Dukhit Ram, aged about 42 years. 3) Santoshi, aged 22 years, W/o. Hira Lal Paikra Both R/o. Village Latuwa, Teh. Baloda Bazar, Raipur Dist. CG State. Vs. Respondents 1. Yashwant, aged about 35 years, S/o. Non-applicants Takhatram Verma, R/o. Suratpura, Bhatapara (PS), Raipur Dist. CG State. 2. Nakul Singh Thakur, aged about 45 years, S/o. Shri Lakhan Singh Thakur, R/o. Village Amlidih, Bhatapara (PS), Raipur Distt. CG State. (Appeal under Section 173 ofthe MotorVehicle Act, 1988). Presei'it: None for the appellants. None for the respondents. Oral Order (Passedonl 1-2-2010) PerT.P. Sharma,J. None for the appellants. Even in the second call also none appeared on behalf ofthe appellants. Raju 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are left with noother option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. —- - Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge Sd/- Rangnath Chandrakar Judge