WP(C) 678/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. A.R. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. M. Kh ataniar, learned standing counsel for the Education Department and Mr. G. Goswam i, learned standing counsel for the SSA. Although it is contended by the learned standing counsel for the Education Depar tment that the impugned recruitment process initiated through the advertisement dated 19.1.2011 (Annexure-8) has been abandoned, the learned counsel for the pet itioners submits that the petitioners have another subsisting grievance of non f inalisation of the selection process initiated by the District Level Selection C ommittee, Cachar in the year 2005-06 in pursuant to the advertisement dated 2.12 .2005. However, Mr. M. Khataniar, learned standing counsel submits that the Apex Court has since intervened in the process of recruitment initiated through the advertisement dated 2.12.2005 and the same has been set aside. Since the impugned recruitment process, initiated through the advertisement date d 19.1.2011 has already been abandoned, and the Supreme Court has intervened wit h the recruitment process initiated through the advertisement dated 2.12.2005, I see no reason to keep this writ petition pending in Court. Accordingly the case is disposed of.