..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.811 OF 2007 IN SESSIONS CASE NO.152 OF 2004 1.Ramesh Barikrao Kale, 2.Ramesh Mohan Kale, 3.Hira Murlidhar Pawar, & 4.Shivaji Hari Pawar. ...Applicants. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.D.B.Tare, Adv. for the Applicants. Mr.Rajesh More, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 10th April, 2007. DATED : 10th April, 2007. DATED : 10th April, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicants and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking bail in C.R.No.84 of 2004 of Uran Police Station, District - Raigad. The said case is under Sections 395, 397 of IPC. 3. The applicants have already been convicted by the trial Court under Sections 395, 397 of IPC. The appeal preferred by the applicants is pending ..(2).. before the Sessions Court. 4. The learned Advocate for the applicants states that coaccused have been released on bail by this Court by order dated 30.8.2006 and the case of the applicants is the same as that of the coaccused. However, thereafter there has been change as far as the present case is concerned i.e. appeal has been expedited. The appeal has been expedited by this Court by order dated 14.11.2006 in C.R.A.381 of 2006 with direction that the appeal to be disposed of in any event by 30.4.2007. 5. Looking to the fact that the Appeal is to be disposed of by 30.4.2007, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicants at this stage. Application is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)