IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 23677 of 2005 BETWEEN: 1. G. Ramesh Chander, S/o. G. Rajaveer Arya, Occ: Service R/o. Qtr. No.B3/2, NTPC, PTS, Jyothinagar, Karimnagar District. 2. G. Suresh, S/o. G. Rajaveer Arya, Occ: Service, R/o. T2-626, GM Colony, Godawarikhani, Karimnagar District. 3. G. Dinesh, S/o. G. Rajaveer Arya, Occ: Service, R/o. H.No.11- 22-60, Kashibugga, Karimnagar District. ... PETITIONERS AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Superintendent of Police, Warangal. 2. G. Rajaveer Arya, S/o. Veraiah, Occ: Retired Teacher, H.No.11-22-60, Narendra Nagar, Kashibugga, Warangal. 3. G. Rakesh, S/o. G. Rajaveer Arya, Occ: Aided School Teacher, H.No.11-22-63/1, Narendra Nagar, Kashibugga, Warangal. 4. G. Purnima Rao, S/o. G. Rakesh, Occ: Profession, H.No.11-22-63/1, Narendra Nagar, Kashibugga, Warangal. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein no to deprive the life and limb of the petitioners herein without following the due process of law as contemplated under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and pass such other orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents 2 to 4: MR. BRAHMACHARI RAMESH The Court made the following: ORDER: Petitioners submit that pursuant to representation dated 01.09.2005 made by the second respondent before the President of India, which has been forwarded to the Chief Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh for appropriate action, their life and liberty is sought to be deprived without following due process of law. 2. I do not see any material whatsoever with regard to the deprivation of the life and liberty of the petitioners by any of the respondents. However, as it is stated that the petitioners have made a representation subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, it is open for the petitioners to pursue the said representation. 3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and in the absence of any incident bringing to the notice of this Court the alleged interference with the life and liberty of the petitioners, I am of the opinion that no further orders required to be passed in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J July 23, 2008 DSK