C.R.No.340 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.340 of 2009. Decided on August 12, 2009. Parveen Kaur and others .. Petitioners VERSUS Mehakdeep Kaur and others .. Respondents * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI PRESENT Mr.Surinder Mohan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) The petitioners are defendants in a case filed by respondents-minors seeking a declaration that they are owners in possession of House No.262-B-1-554A, and the land mentioned in heading of the plaint. They had also filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC, to restrain the petitioners-defendants from alienating the property and from dispossessing the plaintiffs- respondents during pendency of the suit. The application for interim injunction was dismissed by the trial Court on 10.05.2005, observing that the property of minors cannot be sold without permission of the . . . 1 C.R.No.340 of 2009 Court and that alienation during pendency of the case, if any, would be subject to the provisions of lis pendens. The lower appellate Court in an appeal filed by the plaintiffs-respondents granted the interim injunction staying the alienation of the property during pendency of the case before the trial Court. Aggrieved against the order passed by the lower appellate Court dated 06.05.2008, this revision petition has been preferred. I have heard counsel for the petitioners and considered the facts and circumstances of the case. Since the respondents-plaintiffs are minors daughters of Tirath Pal Singh, who had committed suicide, the rights of the plaintiffs-respondents are required to be protected during pendency of the trial to avoid multiplicity of litigation. I do not find any ground for interference in the order passed by the lower appellate Court. The revision petition is dismissed. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE August 12, 2009. rka . . . 2