THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA WRIT PETITION NO.10970 OF 2011 ORDER: {Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Prakash Rao} Heard Sri V.S.R.Anjaneyulu, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Ch.Siva Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-Bank. At their request, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage. The petitioner filed this Writ Petition, inter alia, seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent in referring the loan account ODBD Account No.1217429460 of Sri Ch.Ram Prasad for one-time settlement as illegal and consequently, directing the respondent not to proceed further in respect of the said loan till final decision is taken. On hearing both the sides, the question that arises for consideration is as to whether the representations submitted by the petitioner in this regard are considered or not. After obtaining instructions, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the representations of the petitioner remained unconsidered and no orders have yet been passed. In view of the same, it would suffice in the interest of justice to direct the respondent-Bank to consider the representations of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of directing the respondent-Bank to consider the representations of the petitioner, including the latest one submitted on 03.01.2011, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four {4} weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is needless to mention that till the disposal of the said representations and orders are communicated; no overt steps should be taken against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) ________________ (B.N.RAO NALLA, J) 27th April 2011 RRB