-7 (L^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.(C) No. l^U of 2011 PETITIONER v^^/ •^y •(»• €? '•. ^y y VERSUS RESPONDENT M/s Naveen Transport through its partner Harjinder Singh Bal, aged about 49 years, S/o Sardar Nirmal Singh Bal, R/o Pacharipara, Durg Distt. Durg (C.G.) State Transport Authority, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA e>s E2i'' ^'<<: ^% s^' _iS^S-»E__) i»F.?~^t E^i'y j!Klt^: /•~si..cE .8 & *?•°¥°i^*jr% AiT^lit i~iiE A "IIUrl wUUrtf Uf UMHAI ! ISUAKM, Irili.A. ihe SS /^~t &"-- -fl^^^;'1"!'^^ ^ vv.r. i.v) HO. lo^s/.tU'1'i i^a i ~E° B a^-1 £a^,a iT P-° P^i E li 1 Iw'I^S:^ iVI/s Naveen Transport throusn its partner Harjinder Singh Ba!, aaed ^bout 49 yosrs, S/& Ssrci^r Niims! Singh Bai, R/o Pacharipara, Durg Distt. Dura fC.G.) Rpts.pfiMncissr S -^.ltu,t=i;g T'us''t~^&sf:Sa,f'Q 1 f'T" P°ii-i i ! r"^ VctSUo ransDort Authoritv, F~l-:-_-. ,.. if^ f^' \ (L/.S.3.) 'iai?l N "y1 S^S T' S *i- a j-^^ S-'5*i-'a.j-=>5,S.^ 1 ja i,^t,E=Jft-^ A ?-st'l?'tiF-^i i~E J(c:t*'.i J».s»^S°-'S's.i?" .-•i*J«liaisPl*yS-?la i^=i^aia.&i * i *" 8,&ai?«»iA ijJjyni.UNycKAKjiyi-t^tSAUC iMl: W»wSJU u IJuTu Ur iniyiA &BR£M!.£10.£.S: ivlr. Santosh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. yr-.Shashank Thakur, Pane! Lawver ror i-espondsnt f. f^sr^ss Ur\^Li U^U^r< i4 -^ ^ .^>'^v-u?..&v Heard nnaily w'Jth the consent of learned counsei for the parties. 1 ne pgiiiioner nas Tuea inis pei'iion Tor issuance 01 necessary uirection to the State Transport Authority to consider and decide the appiication fur p.fant o' interstate reyuiar permu on the route RaJpur to Sjyni Vla Dhamdha, Gandai, Saihepara, Malazkhand, Balaghat, Katangi and one singte trip dal!y in accoi'dance with the provisions o' the Motor Vehicles Act. Accoraing 10 ine peii'iioner, ine appiicauon TOF grani OT permn nas ueen Tiieu on 17.08.2007 and no decision has been taken tiii date. Learned counsei for the respondent submits that if such appfication has been fiied by the petitioner and the same has not been uisposed of till UetS, i^\v OLCil^ s {oUspUH MUlHUFlE.y ^li^?1 U'^pUSiS ^j! IH^ SrteHI^ at IHic S?GffH^&l !H 80COr08HGB'WIIH 18W. !n view of the above submissions made by iearned counsei for the responoerrt, inis peiiiion ss aisposeu or wiin a airection inat fr ine concemea W.P.SC'fNo.1626('20T1 State Transport Authority has not decided the appiication dated 17.08.2007 fiied by the petitioner for grant of above permit tiit date, the sarne shail be disj3oseu ofin accordancewith law, as early as possible, preferabiy within a perioQ of 10 weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order by the petitioner before the sai'd authority. ?Vith the afor aireciion/ODservation. this Detition stands finaii' aisposea or. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge