1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3109 OF 2009 Kutubali Yasinali Sayed. ... Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Mr. A.K. Upadhyay for the Petitioner. Mrs. S.V. Gajare, APP for the State. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 25th JANUARY 2010. P.C. :- Heard learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner. Perused the concurrent orders of the learned Magistrate and the Revisional Court. All that has happened is a process is issued summoning the Petitioner. The Complaint of the Second Respondent/Complainant is alleging offences punishable under Section 328,341,342,354,323, 376, 504, 506 and 406 of I.P.C. 2. After examining the Complainant and a witness, the learned Magistrate concluded that there is sufficient ground and prima-facie case to proceed against the Accused/Petitioner for offences punishable under Sections 354 and 376, etc. The offences are outlined in the order issuing process. The allegations are serious in nature and made against a public servant – Petitioner. 2 3. In these circumstances, this is not a fit case for interference in my inherent and writ jurisdiction. The Petitioner will have ample opportunity to prove that the allegations are false and that he is innocent. Today, at this stage of issuance of process, this is not a fit case for interference. The Writ Petition is dismissed. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)