IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38755 of 2010 1. AMARJEET YADAV @ AMARJEET KUMAR 2. BITTHAL YADAV @ ANKESH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----- 03. 11.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the state. Allegation against named eleven accused persons including these petitioners is about their abducting informant’s father and later killing. Submission of the learned counsel for petitioners is that final form is submitted finding non-presence of the petitioners in the incident. F. I. R. is clear enough about involvement of these petitioners also that is corroborated by the informant in his further statement. Several witnesses are there about abduction and killing two of them. Paras-9 and 10 are naming all the eleven accused persons including these petitioners while two of the witnesses are not naming these petitioners including confession of co-accused Bipin Yadav. The informant is the only eye witness of the case, rest of the witnesses are hearsay witnesses and informant is naming these petitioners. Accordingly, prayer of petitioners for anticipatory bail stands rejected. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)