IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.6125/2010 Ugrasen Vs. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor Date of Order ::: 02.08.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHUVENDRA S. RATHORE Shri Sriram Yadav, Counsel for petitioner Shri G.S. Rathore, Public Prosecutor #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the parties. While the bail application of co-accused Sant Kumar was considered by this Court, it was submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that it was Munna @ Ransingh and Agrasen who caused firearm injury to the deceased. As per the statement of Ram Prakash the present petitioner had caused firearm injury to the deceased. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the supplement statement of Ram Prakash does not mention this fact. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that at this stage appreciation of evidence with regard to the two statements of Ram Prakash cannot be made and it is for the trial court to do the same at the appropriate time. Therefore, I do not find it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Consequently, the bail application is dismissed. (Raghuvendra S. Rathore) J. //Jaiman//