IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 35 OF 2004 SHRI DEVIDAS N. NARVEKAR AND ANR., ....Appellants Versus SMT. SHOBHAVATI P.KHANDEPARKAR AND ....Respondents 5 ORS., Mr. R. G. Ramani, advocate for the appellants. Mr. R. V. Kamat, advocate for the respondents no.1 to 6. Coram:- R. M. LODHA, J. Date:- 14th September, 2005 P.C. Heard Mr. Ramani, the learned counsel for the appellants. I perused the Order dated lst April, 2004 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panaji. The trial Court has given valid reasons in paragraphs 6 and 7 of the order for holding that the plaintiffs have failed to show prima face case. I find no ground to take a different view. As regards the balance of convenience also, the trial Court found that in favour of the defendants. No case for interference is made out in the impugned Order. The Appeal from Order is dismissed in limine. R. M. LODHA, J.