IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH OCTOBER 2009 / 22ND ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 27806 of 2009(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.P. MOIDEENKUTTY, S/O. MOHAMMED, MATHILPARAMBIL HOUSE, PANTHAVOOR, POST ALANCODE, MALAPPURAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE MALAPPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, CHANGARAMKULAM BRANCH, POST CHANGARAMKULAM, MALAPPURAM DIST, REPRESENTED BY IT'S MANAGER. 2. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., MALAPPURAM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.27806 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 14th day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is challenging Ext.P2 notice issued under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. By a notice under Section 13(2) the petitioner is not affected. The petitioner is free to file his objections against Ext.P2 under Section 13(2) notice and only if, after considering the same, a notice under Section 13(4) is issued, the petitioner can be said to be aggrieved. Even then, the petitioner's remedy lies in filing an appeal against the notice under Section 13(4) of the Act as provided under the Act itself. Therefore, there is no merit in the challenge against the impugned notice. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. If the petitioner files his objections against Ext.P2 within two weeks, it would be considered for further action in the matter. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2