In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Revision No. 2049 of 2005 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 29, 2011 Randhir Singh @ Dogar ---Petitioner versus State of Punjab ---Respondent Coram: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH *** Present: Mr.Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for Mr. L.M.Gulati, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. P.S.Paul, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab *** GURDEV SINGH, J. Heard. The petitioner-accused, Randhir Singh @ Dogar, has preferred this revision against his conviction for the offences under Sections 279, 337 and 304-A IPC and the sentence imposed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Fatehgarh Sahib as under:- Sr. No. Under section Sentence imposed Fine 1 304 -A IPC To undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years ` 200/- In default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months 2 279 IPC To undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months ` 200/- In default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month 3 337 IPC To undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months ` 200/- In default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month Crl. Revision No. 2049 of 2005 -2- and in the appeal, the sentence under Section 304-A IPC was reduced from two years to one year and six months. The State counsel has placed on record letter dated 28.3.2011 of the Superintendent, Central Jail, Patiala. As per that letter, this petitioner- accused has already been released from jail after the completion of the substantive sentence so imposed upon him. It has been submitted by counsel for the petitioner-accused that after the completion of the substantive sentence, this revision has become infructuous and be dismissed as such. Revision is dismissed as having become infructuous. Records of the trial court be returned forthwith. (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE March 29, 2011 PARAMJIT