THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No :26119 of 2007 DATED:17-01-2008 BETWEEN: P.Vajram. ..... PETITIONER AND The Joint Collector, Guntur District & another. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not handing over the petitioner’s land of Ac.5.02 cents in Sy.No.618/1 of Adavithakkellapadu village, Guntur District having been forcibly resumed by virtue of the orders of the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.900/2003-D, dated 10-05-2005, ex parte and without taking further steps on the representation, dated 10-09-2007, made to the 1st respondent, as illegal, and arbitrary. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that she made a representation, dated 10-09-2007, before the 1st respondent-Joint Collector, Guntur District for restoration of the assigned land of an extent of Ac.3.00 in her favour out of the total assigned land of an extent of Ac.5.02 guntas from which Ac.2.00 was already sold by her husband. It is not in dispute that an extent of Ac.5.02 guntas was assigned in favour of the husband of the petitioner, namely Danial in Sy.No.618/1 of Adavithakkellapadu village, Guntur District. It is stated that various extents of land have been assigned in favour of several assignees including the petitioner who are the landless poor but all of them have alienated the said land and therefore, the 2nd respondent-Mandal Revenue Officer, Guntur vide order in Rc.No.900/2003-D, dated 10-05-2005, resumed the lands on the ground that they have alienated the said land. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, the only course open for her is to question the said order of the appellate authority and against the said order of the appellate authority, a revision is also available, but without questioning the legality or validity of the said resumption order, it is not just and proper for the petitioner to seek any relief from this Court under extraordinary jurisdiction seeking the relief of restoration of resumption of Ac.3.00 contending that her husband sold only Ac.2.00, and Ac.3.00 was illegally resumed. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant any relief in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J 17th January, 2008. Tsy