^ INTHEmGHCOURT QELCIfflATnSGARH AT BILASPUR WritPetitionNo. /752 /2001 PETmONER RESPONDENTS ^.^" ,.^2^^'v ..€^y" .^ , yf Ant RamVenna S/o IAS~.^ Aged abosut ^ years Sarpanch Gram Panchayat_Gorakhpur TehsB-Lomri District-Bilaspur. Versus- : l.ChiefExecutiveOfiBcer, Janpad Pachayat Lornu District- Bilaspur. 2. Additional CoUector, Bilaspur. 3. Comnassioner; Bilaspur Division Bilaspur. 4./ Bhushan Prasad Sahu S/o Shri Ved Ram Sahu, Secretay Gram Panchyat Gorakhpur, R/o Vfllage- Sonpur, P.0. Manoharpur, Tehsil-Lomu, District- Bilaspur. 5./- Shri N.Kumar Bunnan' S/o Khomdas, Secretary(biconung) R/o Bhaliddiondra, Tehsil-Lonni District-Bilaspur. WKTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF TEIE CONSTTTUnON FOR KSUANCE OF A WRTT OF CERTIORAKL MANDAMUS. PROHIBmON OR ANY OTHER SUTTABUE WgmORDDER ORDmECTIQN. u XS-HC-22 -ysf •^Wivi<i, s, wiray ^'^ '^ /) •^s(6,9y7 ^-Q^-^-j^^^ CJt k>.\ 4k sv^ -& *"''• vi (.< 'y»^s-\Mv'. •jl^^f ^^^' ^ .. - J i?^ (; /rT~T g .^-^-f-/pYu{/^ v^\k.<iy:ty'}^v^ •i^'^ A.V'" --ril-y •A'l.WlOi.'Yn'vt, . f'fkJt ~n(r .At~iT..f.ftn.ys^.W,ft...^_...Cy.!..l£<::...?:»<,Gcux<y.?....wpXce^-3 WT'-fT 37lt5T^T f;F]W3i1^T ! ';r^?^"^i'?ri ant?i ?«giWHf^i 11.10.2001 Shri Raj Kamal learned couiisel for the Shrj. Deep Kesbarwani, learned Panel Lawyer for s. Shrl Deep Kehsarwani, < submits that since ttie matte^: is pendlng before the Conani- ssloner, Bilaspur, tbe sane should be examined and dispo^ < sed of on merit expeditiousl^-; ; to avold any further confusA|oij < as regards the post o£ Panc- tiayat Secretary. It may be j <( I " stated that the.respondent No.4 ~ Shri Bhushan Prasad Sahu was removed frcan the post of Panchayat Secretary on 30.3.2001 and the same , respondent No.5 - ShrJ. j r.KamaT'Bui.iuau Wtis—eippoiui.ed 'iRrafSTqN-WT?ff •? ft^t •rf3R?R ^? sif-gii sn^i f'^^0 j^J Petition of .....\^.'.&........... frsssvtg^ on ...\\-.. &;.Q .^... K!';til t.ySt.ri V^.l^M^.^ jt i>e checkeii fixed ffr. VS 5lT^?!^I fq^' -STT^T 'a^:TI^;"?iT?^ ss S^W^T^mT^. | —""^^,^"-"y'-^ |as Panichayat~Secretary^ i^wever, ^Be"-saId~Dr&ec~o£ iremoval was set aside by ABditional Collector• Isaid order of Additional Collector was appealed against before tbe canmisslioner and the same is [pending £or disposal. Itj is contende'd that as on jthis date responaeht No.5 j- Sbri. lI.Kumar Burman -s ifunctioning as Panchayat S^cretary. It seems tbe 1 Jmatter is to be (tecided fi|nally oa merit by tb< iCannmissioner after taicing kll factors into conside- iration. No specific issuej on merit can be decide-1 jat this stage' by this Courjt. In the result, a£te|; hearingShri Raj Kamal ISingh, the learned counsel £ox the petitioner as |well as Shri Deep Kesharwani, learned Panel Lawyer f.RCAbe.iEe^ondents, thts jpetition is disposed of h'".'""**';'?'*—?—-'-•-. . :: . ..i jttifeh_,the, ..dl.rsc'fcion that th|e appeal ncw pending bef- •••:v~' : • , :'^->-'.. l.gc^ tbe Comnixssioner shouljd be heard and decided lfl^: Sr at't'he earliest anid not later than 31. fc '**.« ; :-•••• jOctober,-2ftei*. Until the jnatter is finally decided by, the Conunissione^, st.atus quo as regards |the post of. Panchayat Secrgtary shail be main' ias.iifc ex.i&ts on tbis dafce.l 1 This petition is dijsposedof accordi.ngly. Certified copy as pter rules. Sd/- Chief Justice 4