'^. mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 2703 of2007 PETITIONERS ¥" RESPONDENTS 1. Smt. Lawanya Rrabha Singh, aged 42 Years, Wife of Shri V.N. Singh, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Girls Primary School, No. 7 Station Para Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 2. Nimial Chand Joshi, Aged 56 Years S/o Shri ShyamKant Josdii, Head Master, Govt. Primary School, Paneyka, Block & Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3. ManrAahmi iam Kanoje, Aged 58 Years, S/o Bisnath Ram Kanoje, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Paneyka, Distt. Rajnandgaon. 4. Sfaankar Singh Baghel, Aged 56 Years, S/o Thakur Shamaru Singh Baghel, Assistant Teacher, Chikhali, Distt. Rajnandgaon. 5. Smt. Uma Shrirange, Aged 52 Years, C/o Ramesh Kumar Shrirange, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Singhdai, Rajnandgaon. 6. Chander Shakher Bawanker, Agai 45 Years, S/o Shri Shankar Lal Bawanker, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Girls Primary School No. 7, Distt. Rajnandgaon. 7. Girdhar Lal Sahu, Aged 47 Years, S/o Birsingh Sahu, Assistant Teaeher, Village Dongargaon, WardNo. 4, Distt. Rajnandgaon. VERSUS 1. Tfae State Goverament of Chhalrisgarh Through <he Secretary, Education & Tribal Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. The District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) _. -—- r' WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA S.B. : HON'BLEJUSTICESHRISATISHK.AGNIHOTRI Present: Mr. Somkant Vemia, Advocate for fhe petitioners. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State / respondents. ORDER (Passed on 4th day ofMay, 2007) I. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that Ifae fact and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed ofvide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is altowed in terms of the order passed in the case ofYashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mimicipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed. Examination Certificate on their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and farther whether they have been paid two ad'ronce increments or not. No order as to costs. ^- Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge