IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2010 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 12032 of 2010(D) -------------------------------- PETITIONERS: ---------------- 1. VIMAL HARIDAS, NIRMALAYAM, KUTHIRAVATTAM P.O, KOZHIKODE-16. 2. ABDUL KARIM PALATHINGAL,PALATHINGAL HOUSE,VELIMUKKU(PO),MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. MIDHUN JOSE,THAIKKATTIL HOUSE, SAW MILL ROAD, KOORKKANCHERRY, THRISSUR-680 007. 4. ASWANTHLAL,32/1456,POOLAVIL PARAMBA, KALLAI PO, KOZHIKODE-673 003. 5. K.NEERAJA,'THEJUS'NEAR ADATTU TEMPLE, NADUVATTAM, BEYPORE NORTH, CALICUT-673 015. 6. SWETHA.D.N, OTTUR MANA, MATHUR MANA ROAD THOTTAKARA PO, OTTAPPALAM-679 102. 7. RINILRAJ.P.K, 19/1560,"REENA", VADAKKUVEEDUPURAMA,CHALAPPURAM PO, CALICUT-683 002. 8. NAVEEN KUMAR, SREERANJINI,ANNUR PO, PAYYANNUR,KANNUR-670 332. 9. TOMY JOSEPH, 55-B, POCKET-A,GTB ENCLAVE, DELHI-110 093, RESIDING AT A-63,MEN'S HOSTEL, GOVT.ENGINEERING COLLEGE, THRISSUR. 10. ASHWIN RAHULAN EYYANI,ASHIRVAD, EYYANI HOUSE,EDAMUTTAM PO, THRISSUR DIST-680568. 11. DIVYA.M, LAKSHMI NILAYAM,NELLIKATT, BALLA PO, ANANDASRAM VIA, KASARAGOD-671531. BY MS.SREEDEVI KYLASANATH, ADVOCATE. MS.V.J.SAFEENA, ADVOCATE. WP(C).No. 12032 of 2010(D) ...2... RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY PO, CALICUT-673 635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O, CALICUT-673 635. BY MR. P.C. SASIDHARAN, SC, CALICUT UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.12032 OF 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of April, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioners are 8th semester B.Tech students of the Government Engineering College, Thrissur. The petitioners appeared for the 6th semester examination and when the result of the same was published in March 2010, the petitioners failed in certain papers. Exhibits P1 to P11 are the applications for revaluation submitted by the petitioners. The petitioners have produced chalan receipts also evidencing payment of revaluation fee. 2. The main prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the 2nd respondent to complete the revaluation process for which the petitioners applied through Exhibits P1 to P11 and publish the results thereof within a time frame. It is submitted that unless the revaluation is completed earlier, that may cause difficulty and hardship to the petitioners. 3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the W.P.(C) No.12032/2010 2 University. It is submitted that sufficient time will be required to complete the process of revaluation. In the light of the urgency shown by the petitioners, there will be a direction to the University to complete the revaluation of the papers as sought for in Exhibits P1 to P11 and communicate the results thereof to the petitioners within a period of eight weeks, if the applications and the remittance of fee are otherwise in order. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp