WPMS No.2104 of 2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. Vipul Painuly, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, the learned senior counsel for the respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioner vociferously relied upon a decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in M/s Sravan Dall Mill P. Ltd. Vs. Central Bank of India AIR 2010 A.P. 35. After going through the said judgment, the court is of the opinion that the said judgment is per incuriam in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in Mardia Chemicals Limited & others Vs. Union of India & others 2004 (4) SCC 311. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties at some length, the court is of the opinion that the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy available by invoking the provisions of Section 17 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act by filing an appeal before the Tribunal concerned. The writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 02.11.2011 LSR