XI-HC—78 . IQ 4f:M‘ §.3 2‘.‘ m maim Shri San'sh Chandra Velma, counsel £)r the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, Panel lawyer for the respondents No. 1, 2 and 3. ‘o Norm for the respondent Heard. Learned counsel for th petiu‘oner was appointed as a Badhul. The petitioner was tc issuing show cause notice dated 22.3.2005. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that an appeal against the Older of termination is pending befom the Sub Divisional ’O$cer, Bemetara, Distt.- Dumg. ‘The petitioner wants to ‘wimdmw this petition with a Jiimcn'on that the said appeal No. 37 B/ 121 year 2004-05 per omcer, Bemetara/respondent decided. In view of the above, the Withdrawn with the direction consider and decide the afoxe: preferably Within a period of xeceipt of this Older. _ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn‘ Judge mzoor . 4. peu'tioner submits that the hayat Karrni at Panchayat, ted nom his service after .ding before the Sub Divisional No. 3 be considered and writ petition is dismissed as to the respondent No. 3 to said apneal expeditiously and two months nom the date of \J, i WW» ‘ \ i} - . c anéamwgiaw) mamm mmanéam mgwmma _ WWWWWW $Wané21 —‘¢-_0 ._ , . , . 21.11.2005