IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-34559 of 2010 Date of Decision: 05.01.2011 Jaspal Singh and others .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. R.K. Arya, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Bhavna Gupta, DAG Punjab Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate for the complainant 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition is filed seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 160 dated 14.11.2010 for an offence under Section 380 IPC registered at Police Station City Batala, District Batala. Learned counsel for the petitioners has vehemently argued that son of the petitioners got married with daughter of the complainant against the wishes of the complainant. It has further been argued that Crl. Misc. No. M-15227 of 2010 was filed before this Court seeking protection by the run away couple i.e. son of the petitioners and daughter of the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioners further argued that due to this reason, petitioners have been wrongly implicated in the present case. Crl. Misc. No. M-34559 of 2010 2 Ms. Bhavna Gupta, DAG Punjab on the instructions of SI Kewal Singh has stated that petitioners have joined investigation, however, recovery is yet to be made. Learned counsel for the complainant has stated that after getting bail, petitioners shall also go to abroad to their son and they will not come back. Considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 25.11.2010 is made absolute. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (ALOK SINGH) 05.01.2011 JUDGE reena