IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6966 of 2008 1. RAM SHARAN YADAV SON OF RAMAUTAR YADAV 2. RAM PUKAR RAI @ RAM PUKAR YADAV, SON OF RAMESHWAR YADAV. 3. RAMESHWAR RAI @ RAMESHWAR YADAV SON OF RAMFAL YADAV 4. RAGHUNATH RAI SON OF SUKDEO RAI 5. RAM EKBAL RAI SON OF SHIV MANGAL YADAV 6. TRILOKI YADAV SON OF SURENDRA YADAV. 7. SHAMBHU YADAV SON OF LATE SHIV MANGAL YADAV 8. JAI RAI SON OF RAMDHARI RAI 9. RAMGAYA YADAV @ RAMAGAYA RAI SON OF MALIK YADAV. 10. MUKESH RAI SON OF JAI RAI. 11. JAI NARAIN YADAV SON OF RAMDHARI YADAV 12. PERMA RAI @ PERMA YADAV SON OF SURAJ YADAV 13. THAGA RAI SON OF SADHU RAI 14. RAMCHANDRA YADAV SON OF BANSI RAI 15. UMESH RAI @ UMESH YADAV SON OF RAMAGYA RAI 16. SHANKER RAI SON OF SUKHDEO RAI 17. BADHA RAI SON OF BASDEO RAI 18. BINDESHWARI RAI SON OF BASDEO RAI 19. YODHAR RAI @ RAMAYODHYA RAI 20. RAJ KISHORE YADAV SON OF LAKHAN RAI 21. RAGHO RAI SON OF JAGAT RAI 22. DEO NARAIN RAI SON OF JAGAT RAI 23. NAWAL KISHORE YADAV SON OF RAM CHANDRA YADAV 24. AWADH KISHORE YADAV SON OF RAM CHANDRA YADAV 25. AMAR YADAV SON OF RUP NARAIN YADAV 26. VISHWA NATH RAI SON OF RUP NARAIN YADAV 27. VIDYA RAI SON OF GOPAL RAI. ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KAHKENWA, P.S. ADAPUR, DISTRICT-EAST CHAMPARAN. -PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RUP NARAYAN PRASAD SON OF SRI SITA RAM SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KATKANWA, P.S. ADAPUR, DISTRICT-EAST CHAMPARAN. --OPPOSITE PARTY _______ 2 For the Petitioners : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey For opp.party no.2 : Dr. Amrendra kumar For the State : Mr. N.N. Tiwary 3 23.04.2010 Heard Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Dr. Amrendra Kumar, for the opposite party no.2. During hearing learned counsel for opposite party no.2 submitted that after commitment of the case by impugned order trial has already commenced in Sessions Court bearing Sessions Trial no. 1047 of 2007 wherein after framing of charge already seven witnesses have been examined. This submission is accepted. In this view of the matter, this application stands disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners to agitate all the points before the trial court at appropriate stage. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad