w‘a cg tw IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) W.P. S No. 2010 PETITIONER : f Gaukaran Kumar Yadav, S/o. Shri Bisahu Ram, aged about 36 years, R/o. Post — Sihawa, Tahsil —- Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS r (1) State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Dhamtari, Division (Samanya) , Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) (3) Depot Offlcer, offlce of Depot Offlcer (forest), Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA /. 2A.“ ; v ‘ é W m N€~m)mq&r¢3 ca m mam I m Wmmm _ WWW wW éamanéa S3 : HGN’BLE JUSTICE MR. PRITINKER DIWAKER 1042-2910: Shri Vinod Deshmukh, coursel for the patitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, G.A. for ths Stats. Grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that though he is entitled for his r ion on the post of Fomst Guard, he has been regularized o the post ofwatchman. Counsel for the petitioner ubmits that the respondents have completed all the formalities or passing necessary order in favour of the petitioner and theref re at this stage the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw th present petition with liberty to file a fresh. representation be re respondent No.2 and the same may be directed to be dec' ed in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, Counsel for the State sub the fact he cannot make any tatement whether the State Government is willing to regulariz the services of the petih'oner on the post of Forest Guard not. However, he has no objection if the petitioner make a representation before the authority concerned and the same is decided by it in accordance with law. / 3's: “ Accordingly, the petition disposed of with a direction that in the event of any represe tation filed by the petitioner before respondent No.2 raising his grievances, the same is l [as ates} ‘ e t r i XI—HC-22 (5% accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. It is made dear that this Cc mt has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case an the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the re esentation of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law. Wm m ‘g—i 200 m Em WW mW m Ewan 1&3 _ WW fiarraW $ Wm expected ’ to be decided by thc authority concerned in