IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3007 of 2006 (O&M) Date of decision:03.03.2009 Bharat Kumar ...Petitioner versus Pritam Chand ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr. Ashish Grover, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondent. 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. At the time of ordering notice of motion, this Court had directed that the payment of half yearly rent beyond Rs.50,000/- was stayed meaning thereby that the tenant shall pay Rs.50,000/- during the pendency of proceedings as half yearly rent. In a related case i.e. Civil Revision No.2025 of 2007 between the same parties in respect of very same property, this Court has allowed the interim order so passed to continue and has directed the final disposal of the case within a period of nine months. Learned counsel for the revision petitioner states that he has no objection if similar order is passed. 2. Without going into the merits of the contentions, the interim order already passed by this Court on 25th May, 2006 shall be allowed to be continued and the Rent Controller is directed to dispose of the case on merits within a period of nine months. 3. The Civil Revision is disposed of in the above terms. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 03.03.2009 sanjeev