IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.2985 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 30, 2011 Narinder Singh & another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Premjit Kalia, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. At the stage of framing the charge, only prima-facie evidence is to be seen. The submission that it was a joint house and hence offence under Section 452 IPC would not be made out is asking for appreciation minutely. Prima-facie, it appears that the petitioner had entered into the portion of that house which was in the exclusive possession of the complainant. If that be so, then prima- facie offence under Section 452 IPC may be revealed. There is no good ground to interfere in the order framing the charge under Section 452 IPC against the petitioners. Dismissed. November 30, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE