AB 615/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.K.MUSAHARY Heard Mr. A. S. Choudhury, learned senior counsel for the accused petiti oner. Also heard Mr. B. S. Sinha, learned Addl. P.P., Assam, and Mr. A. S. Sikda r, learned counsel for the complainant/informant. Learned counsel for the complainant/informant has filed a misc. applicat ion objecting prayer for grant of bail to the accused petitioner, inasmuch as, a ccording to him, there are sufficient materials against the accused petitioner f or prosecution. Mr. Sinha, learned Addl. P.P., Assam, submits that investigation is almost compl ete and there are enough incriminating materials against the accused petitioner and therefore, his prayer for bail may not be granted. CD has been produced today. I have perused the same. The accused petitioner is an elected President of the Gaon Panchayat. On record, it is found that attempts were made by some members of the Gaon Panchayat to re move the accused petitioner from the post of President by moving no-confidence m otions on earlier two occasions but they failed. Since investigation has come to a near conclusion, in my considered view, custod ial interrogation of the present accused petitioner is not warranted at this sta ge. It is for the investigating agency to file charge sheet if they deem it fit and proper. In view of the above, interim bail order passed by this court earlier, is hereby made absolute on the same terms and conditions and also on the condition as pre scribed u/s. 437(3) of CrPC, 1973. The bail petition accordingly stands disposed of.