S62.09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 62 OF 2009 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 233 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 62 OF 2009 Ashok M. Savtale ...Plaintiff. Vs. Kanchan M. Savtale & Ors. ...Defendants. Mr. D.S.Rajapurkar for the Plaintiff. Mr. Harish R. Pawar for the Defendants. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 25th JANUARY, 2010. P.C.- 1 The family members i.e. the Plaintiff and the Defendants have settled the matter out of the Court. A dispute is with respect of ancestral property in question and accordingly, executed the consent terms dated 25th January, 2010. It is signed by the respective parties and their advocates. The consent terms is taken on record and marked "X". All the parties are present in the Court. There is no dispute/objection about the signatures, identification and authorization. The statement is also made that no third persons/parties will be affected by this consent terms and it is well within S62.09 2 the framework of law and the record. The parties have agreed and accepted the undertakings, therefore, by accepting the same, the suit is decreed in terms of consent terms, with liberty. 2 The Notice of Motion is also disposed of in view of this consent terms. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)