1 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3178 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7316 OF 2008 Kamleshsingh Harnamsingh Chowhan ...Applicant vs. Mrs.Veenaben P. Jhaveri ...Respondent Mr..Vivek Kantawala with Ms Sneha Nanandkar i/b Vivek Kantawala & Co. for the petitioner Mr.Karb Tamboli for the respondent CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : MARCH 22, 2010 P.C. 1 The learned counsel for the respondent states that the Constituted Attorney of the respondent by the name Champaklal Sunderlal Jhaveri has complied with the order dated 15th January 2009 by supplying copies of the documents to the petitioner. A xerox copy of the letter sent by the said Champaklal to the petitioner and the Advocate for the petitioner is taken on record and marked `X for identification. The learned counsel for the respondent states that the said letter has been issued by the said Champaklal under the authority of the respondent and therefore, the said letter be treated as one sent by the respondent. He states that the address of the respondent is the address disclosed on the xerox copy of the licence annexed to the said letter. 2 The statements made by the learned counsel for the respondent are accepted. Though belatedly, the respondent has made a substantial compliance with the order dated 15th January 2009. Hence, it is not necessary to keep the application pending. Aforesaid statements made by the learned counsel for the respondent on instructions of the respondent are accepted. Application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE 2