IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26034 of 2010 SANJAY KUMAR ROY Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU. CBI. &ANR ----------- 3. 11.08.2010 Heard the learned Counsels for the petitioner, the CBI and for the UCO Bank. The allegation against the petitioner under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC and Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act is that he is one of the several accused who obtained a bank loan on basis of fake documents. The petitioner is also alleged to be a guarantor for a loan taken by other co- accused in a fraudulent manner. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire loan amount on his loan account has been repaid. This is not denied by the Counsel for the Bank. Counsel for the CBI and the Bank point out that the petitioner is a guarantor for loans taken by other accused on fraudulent documents also. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, CBI (South Bihar), Patna in connection with Special Case No. 17/2008, R.C. No. 23(A) 2008 subject to the conditions as mentioned in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. One of the bailors must be a family members of the petitioner. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)