IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 153 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Mobeen s/o Shri Meharban Ali 2. Varisha w/o Mobeen Both r/o Village Bilaspur, Police Station New Mandi, Muzaffar Nagar (U.P.) …………. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Senior Superintendent of Police, Dehradun, District Dehradun. 2. Station House Officer, Police Station Dalanwala, District Dehradun. 3. Sri Bhagwanti w/o Shri Guru Dutt Singh, R/o 16 M.D.D.A. Colony, Upper Rajeev Nagar, Police Station Dalanwala, District Dehradun. ………. Respondents Sri A.M. Saklani, Advocate on behalf of Sri Sandeep Tandon, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no.3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Sri A.M. Saklani, Advocate on behalf of Sri Sandeep Tandon, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no.3. 2. Sri Pande, the learned Additional Government Advocate, submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners Mobeen and Varisha seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them now has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation has submitted final report in the case before the concerning Court. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 30.06.2006 30.06.2006 A