IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) NO.1200 OF 2011 BINDU KRISHNA SON OF JAGAT NARAIN MANDAL R/O MAUZA RANIPATTI PURAB, P.S.- KUMARKHAND, DISTRICT- MADHEPURA VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SHAMBHU KRISHNA SON OF LATE RAM NARAIN MANDAL 3. BITTU KUMAR SON OF SHAMBHU KRISHNA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RANIPATTI, P.S. CASE NO.- KUMARKHAND, DISTRICT- MADHEPURA ---------------------------------- 2 20/12/2011 The appellant has challenged the inadequacy of conviction and sentenced passed in Sessions Trial No. 211 of 2000 by the learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Madhepura by which the respondent nos. 2 and 3 were acquitted from the charges under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Perusal of the judgment shows that the respondent nos. 2 and 3 were found guilty and they were dealt with under the provisions of section 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act. The trial court has passed reasoned order and we find no perversity in appraisal of the evidence. This appeal is held to be without merit. Accordingly, it is dismissed. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) (Amaresh Kukmar Lal, J.) avin