1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. REVISION APPLICATION NO. 269 OF 1989 CRI. REVISION APPLICATION NO. 269 OF 1989 CRI. REVISION APPLICATION NO. 269 OF 1989 WITH Cri.Revision Appln. No. 255/1989 The State of Maharashtra ..Applicant. V/s. Shri Ramnarayan Pathak & Ors. ..Respondents. ----- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 24, 2005 DATED : FEBRUARY 24, 2005 DATED : FEBRUARY 24, 2005 PC :- PC :- PC :- 1. These matters i.e. Cri. Revision Application No. 269/1989 and Cri. Revision Application No.255/1989 are listed for office objection(s). I proceed to pass a common order in the following terms :- . A). In cases where the Respondent (s) has/ have not been served so far, for whatever reason, the applicant to take steps to serve the unserved respondents within four weeks from today by Advocate’s notice either personally or by R.P.A.D./Speed Post/courier/e-maikl and file the affidavit of service within four weeks, failing which the revision application to stand dismissed for non-prosecution 2 without further reference to the court, as against the unserved respondents. . B). In case of any other office objection (s), the applicant to take steps to remove the same within four weeks from today, failing which the revision application to stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the court. . C). In cases where office objection regarding non-filing of English translation is raised, the same is dispensed with for the time being. . D). Interim order passed earlier, if any, to continue till then. 2. Ordered accordingly. .....