IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2011 / 20TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 21874 of 2011(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- M.K.MUHAMMED HAJI,AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.MUNDEKKATTIL ABOOBACKER, NELLISSERY DESOM,PONNANI TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,COLLECTORATE MALAPPURAM 676 505. 3. THE SUB REGISTRAR EDAPPAL,S.R.O, MALAPPURAM 679 576. GOVT.PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.21874/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT PREPARED AND SUBMITTED FOR REGISTRATION BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 8/7/2011. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 18/7/11. EXT.P3: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE VALUE PUBLISHED CONCERNING THE PROPERTY IN DISPUTE in the INTERNET DATED NIL. EXT.P4: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPEAL BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 19/7/11. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 21874 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 11th day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner claims to be the purchaser of 68 cents of land in Sy.No.88 of Vattakkulam/Kuttipalam Village of Ponnani Taluk. In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is concerning Ext.P2 order passed by the Sub Registrar stating that the value shown in Ext.P1 sale deed is less than the fair value fixed and calling upon the petitioner to make up the deficit. It is stated that aggrieved by the above, he has filed Ext.P4 appeal before the 2nd respondent in terms of Section 28 A(4) of Kerala Stamp Act. In this writ petition, what is sought for by the petitioner is a direction to the 2nd respondent to expeditiously dispose of Ext.P4. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, in the factual background as above, Ext.P4 appeal filed by him has been received and is pending, it is directed that the 2nd respondent shall consider the same in accordance with law with notice to the parties and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this WPC No. 21874/11 :2 : writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp