^ z. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. ^\^> / 2011 ^'&%f^% 'INialJ BENCK <^ PETITIONER ^^X2^s^. ^^{5^^"^ ^^-i-'c^.A..^1'-' t (SW*"""" RESPONDENTS <r VERSUS Smt. Pushpa S. Nair W/o Shri P.K. Suresh Nair, Aged about 47 years, Occupation—Leacturer, Govt. H. Sec. School Hathkhoj Distt. Durg (CG). 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through-The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. /Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur . (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA f/~'* '%. ^i.. ^, ••.."•'^asaass- ^ »» HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 916 OF 2011 Smt. Pushpa S. Nair Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticte 226 ofthe Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. Present:- Shri Vipin Tiwari; Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushi! Dubey, Government Advocate for the State/ respondents. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on this 14th day of February, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petltioner submits that the petitloner is entitled to benefit of two advance increments on account of the fact that the petitioner has passed B.Ed. examination before entering Into the service, at her own cost. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present case is no longer res integra, as the same has been consldered and decided by the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena v. Stats of M.P. & Ors. as weS as by this Court in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj v. Munidpal CorporaGon, Durg and anQthe!^ and Gopesh KvffW Verma v. Ths State Govt. of ChhaWsgarh and anothei^. 4. Learned counsel further submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision as aforestated. Thus, the petitioner may J be permitted to make a representation to decide his case in the '2009(1!1}MPJR(SC)59 ' 2200e^'ll)MPJR-CG96 3WP(S)No.41^0of2005 ' i'i ' 'r, '^ "%, -.-..s. 1 ,S®-^j 6. light of aforestated decisions, subject to verification of the facts asto whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed. certificate on her own expenses before entering into service. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same wiil be considered and decided, in accordance with !aw and in-the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena (supra), within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. In view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, noihing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. _^- - - lo'.'vri' prasfe^^un? judge a-