-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4247 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 624 OF 2005 Shri.Pramod Janardhan Kamble ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.B.R.Patil Advocate for Applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 7,2005 DATE : JULY 7,2005 DATE : JULY 7,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard both sides. Applicant had been convicted under Section 7, 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The maximum sentence imposed on the appellant is one year. 2. The learned advocate for the applicant states that the applicant was on bail pending the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. -2- This statement is not controverted by the learned A.P.P. The learned advocate for the applicant further submitted that the appeal is not likely to be heard within next one year and hence, bail may be granted to the applicant. 3. Looking to the above facts and circumstances and the sentence imposed on the applicant, I am inclined to grant bail. 4. The applicant Pandurang Janardhan Kamble to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties to make up that amount. 5. Application is disposed of. 6. Authenticated copy be issued to the parties. [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J]