vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3801 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.3801 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.3801 OF 2008 Rangdas Swami Shikshan Vikas Mandal ... Petitioner V/s. Pimpri - Chinchwad Municipal Corporation & Anr. ... Respondents Mr.T.D. Deshmukh for Petitioner Mr.N.V. Walawalkar with Mr.G.H. Keluskar for Respondents CORAM: SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J MHATRE, J MHATRE, J. DATED: OCTOBER 20, 2008 OCTOBER 20, 2008 OCTOBER 20, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The petition challenges the order passed by the District Court, Pune in the appeal filed u/s 81F of the BPMC Act. 2. A demand notice was issued to the petitioner as it is in occupation of the land owned by Respondent No.1. That demand notice was issued on 3.10.2006 for payment of Rs.9,77,112/- as arrears of rent from May 1968 to June 2006. This order was challenged by the petitioner by preferring an appeal under section 81F. The District Court has held that the petitioner had not produced any document on record to indicate that he was a gratuitous licencee as claimed by it or that any agreement for lease was executed. The District Court : 2 : has therefore, held that he was in unauthorised occupation of the premises u/s 81C of the Act and that there was no ground made out by the petitioner to set aside the impugned notice dated 3.10.2006. I see no reason to interfere wtih this order passed by the District Court. 3. Petition rejected.