THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO.1239 OF 2006 AND WAMP.NO.2368 OF 2009 IN WRIT APPEAL NO.1929 OF 2002 COMMON ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Prakash Rao) Since the Contempt Case and WAMP.No.2368 of 2009 in WA.No.1929 of 2002 arise out of the same proceedings, they are taken up together for disposal. The complaint in the contempt is that the respondents did not comply with the orders of this Court dated 09.06.2006 passed in WA.No.1929 of 2002 directing the respondents to pass orders in accordance with law under Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995, within a period of four {4} weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of that order. Subsequent to ordering notice before admission in the Contempt Case, the respondents filed counter affidavit stating that they complied with the order of this Court dated 09.06.2006 and issued appointment order vide reference No.BPA/PER/41/08933 dated 27.12.2006 subject to the outcome of the Review Petition and the petitioner has already joined duty on 20.01.2007 and attending regularly. The said review has already been disposed of. Yet, the petitioner came up with another review application along with delay application in WAMP.No.2368 of 2009. Be that as it may, having regard to the compliance of the orders of this Court, we do not find any contempt existing. In view of the same, the Contempt Case and WAMP.No.2368 of 2009 are dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedies available under the law. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) ____________________ (G.BHAVANI PRASAD, J) 25th March 2010 RRB