IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1520 of 2010 1. Anil Kumar Sharma S/O Late Kameshwar Sharma R/O Mohalla- Brampur, P.S.- Bhagwan Bazar, Distt.- Saran At Chhapra. ...Petitioner...Appellant. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through Secretary Food And Consumer Protection Department 2. District Magistrate, Saran At Chapra 3. Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar Chhapra, Distt.- Saran At Chapra. …..Respondents…Respondents. ----------- 2 18 .7.2011 This Letters Patent Appeal has been filed against the Judgment and order dated 03.08.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No. 18509 of 2008, by which the learned Single Judge after thorough scrutiny of the facts and argument before the Court passed a reasoned order rejecting the writ petition. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that initially the licence of the appellant was suspended and he was required to show-cause and after considering the show-cause the order of cancellation was passed. But the order was not reasoned against which the petitioner filed an appeal before the Appellate Authority under the Control order. The Appellate Authority examined thoroughly the show-cause given by the petitioner. The argument of the learned counsel for the 2 appellant is that the learned Single Judge as well as Appellate Authority fell into error in not appreciating the fact and the reason stated in the reply of show-cause notice. The High Court in exercise of its supervisory power do not sit in appeal for re-appreciating the evidenced on record. Therefore, we are not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed. Bhardwaj (Prakash Chandra Verma, J.) (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)