IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2039 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:23.03.2011 M/s Ultra Arts . . .Petitioner Versus Sh. Ram Niwas . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr. Adarsh Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 03.02.2011 by which an application filed by the petitioner for recalling of order dated 07.01.2011 and allowing him to lead his further evidence, has been declined. Against that order, the petitioner had also filed a review application which was dismissed by the learned Rent Controller on 03.03.2011. The only ground on which the application has been maintained is that the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has closed his evidence by making a statement on 07.01.2011 without his consent. However, learned counsel for the petitioner very frankly and fairly admitted that the consent of the petitioner is not required. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the present revision petition and hence, the same is hereby dismissed, however, without any order as to costs. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MARCH 23, 2011 JUDGE vinod*