WP/6040/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6040 OF 2010 Shrirang Manohar Pandit ... Petitioner V/s. The Paper Products Ltd., Thane & Anr.... Respondents Mr. Mayuresh Modgi for the Petitioner. Mr. R.D. Oak with Mr. S.M. Chinchwadkar for Respondent No.1. CORAM: SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATE : 21 ST SEPTEMBER, 2010. P.C. : 1. The learned Advocate for the petitioner states that the Industrial Court, Thane did not have jurisdiction to decide the Complaint (ULP) No.469 of 2008 as the services of the petitioner have been terminated on 18th November, 2009. He contends that the Industrial Court, Thane, therefore, ought to have dismissed the Complaint (ULP) No.469 of 2008 as infructuous. This submission of the learned Advocate cannot be accepted as the Industrial Court could certainly have decided the Complaint (ULP) No.469 of 2008, which was with respect to a transfer order made when the petitioner was in WP/6040/2010 service. The Industrial Court, therefore, was only required to consider whether the transfer was malafide and whether the respondent No.1 has indulged in an unfair labour practice under Item 3 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act. 3. The learned Advocate has not argued on the merits of the findings of the Industrial Court at all and has limited his arguments to the issue of Complaint (ULP) No.469 of 2008 having become infructuous on account of the termination order. 4. The Writ Petition is rejected.