V E: MCIT COUR or mmlczv RE Am xixxmsmm ((3.,9.) wapwro. JJo OF 200? H T k BwTwr Rgkhmanl W/o Sushll Iiahamtl ,ageé about 5 yvars. Amdc Praead 9/0 Jugal X’OShta. S;dh Ram S/o AmVlt Lal Kcghta . Egrjhu S/o Ramaayal Bichiyaa ’ Debki Bai'wf/o ‘sh‘fam Lal Koahta Lal Ram s/o Ghaslya Ioshta V All r¢v1d¢nt oi sanjaf Naaar Ralgar“. “hemraj Agramal S/o Bate Raménaxl Actvax a1 S‘oeCLal E30Ner of Attorney Holocr OE Jhugl Jhonadl Sanaarch Rp al um Cok Ha La a ah ’' smut; Pat eaha J. unuer Rajlv Gandhl 351mzay Plan, :1 / 5tt G. hw, s Gll, klgELe /.,.oov. “o r ! ‘ ~ PETI Tl ON ERS ta‘u $‘ 3 K.Bullc1lng, Ralpun_ c h , e a evonu ment ah a op.. / i of ndi U ‘ 3., Unon Iag Throu Ministry of Railways, NEW DELHI gh ; Ge r a1 Maage ,' en n r South Eastr Rilw, Gree Reh; en aayg n ac Cacttao lu A South ivisioal wastern Raiav Raiiway ‘angcr, Bila’éurw Dn lw ’ Ia s o a . la 'penior DiVisinal mgi 1am ,Soa. Raiwy, Jilaspuro Aorha) unioi Engineer/Sec won hnglneerC SQ}: Railway, Ralgar ollector Raloar n. 'J h. C h. ~ Superintendent of Police kaictar -ales onunissioner, Tax Departmen Sales Tax, through Bil‘aspurrn asalat'ant H C S t, u RS ESPONDENT @ 0 » . 5ggg£n$h§t§8iggaa“mgh W wemy ) stat of Madya Pradesh through th secrctrv Rt Depart Vallb Bhvan Bhal XI-HGZZ Wm W @W ma .......W 200 31. a? m211 H %\1 - 7,- WW$§€IW wmm leased out to thcm and thz / unitsfstxnctures which is caus' 1t they have put l/up dwelling further avened that a noticg und Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1S but in$teac1 of flh'ng any reply or this Courf and have obtained inte RaJlwaV Administration 1s forc1bly evicting them and demolishing thout giving them an opportunity thelr dweHmg umts/ structures Wi of hearing. At the time of hearing st / counsel at the Bar on behalf of t1: the dwelling units] structures in occupation of the petitioners shaj opportunity of hearing to the petiti' shall be in accordance with law. reference was ‘gn‘adc to the not petitioners. In this View of the m3 § , , any apprehension in the minds Qt be taken against them Without aCCi hearing or in contravention of law [fro W atement is made by the leamed action of eviction or demolition'of .e Railway Administration that no l be taken Without according an ioners and that any action taken In support of his contention ice, which was served on the otter, there can be no question of the petitioners that action shall ' )rding to them an opportunity of \ s mg obstructionfnuisance. It is 3r the Public Premises (Eviction of )71 was issued to the petitioners show cause, they have rushed to mm ordeis bv contending that the i¥ i XI~HC—22 ‘ mmwm _3~ In the above Vicw of the matter and having heard learnsd Coiumol, the Court is of the opinion that in the facts and CH'cumstajnces of the, case, it would be appropxiate. for phe petitioners to participate in the been issued. Accommgly, this writ petition iS disposed of by’ directing the petitioners to file a how cause. before ihe a§propriate .Auiharity, which is Section EV gineer (Works), South Easmm Railway Raigarh. The petition s shall appear before the said authon'ty on 23/G9/é002 as agn oceadings for which a notice has :ed on which date they shall file reply to the notice issued to them and thereafter the authoiities shall proceeti to dispose of the matter in accordance with law iaiid ~ after hearing the petitioners. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the Writ petition stands disposed of. ‘ 1 '“ Certified copy asper qhles. i f ‘ Sd/— EQNaik v r a r, r Flew “ ‘