THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.941 OF 2007 ORDER: 1 The petitioner who is the father of the first respondent herein filed this revision questioning the order dated 02.05.2007 passed in M.P.No.1391 of 2005 in M.C.No.120 of 2003 on the file of the Court of the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the trial of JHCBBC- cum-Additional Family Court, Hyderabad whereunder the maintenance to his minor daughter i.e. the first respondent herein was enhanced from Rs.750/- to Rs.2,000/-. 2 Brief facts are that the daughter of the revision petitioner who was unable to maintain herself approached the Family Court, Hyderabad and filed M.C.No.120 of 2003 under section 125 of Cr.P.C. claiming maintenance at the rate of Rs.1,000/- p.m. The Court below after holding enquiry awarded maintenance at the rate of Rs.750/-. However, in view of the changed circumstances, she filed a petition under section 126 Cr.P.C. seeking enhancement of the said maintenance from Rs.750/- to Rs.5,000/-. The said petition was allowed partly and the maintenance of Rs.750/- granted initially was enhanced to Rs.2,000/-. The same is questioned in this revision. 3 It appears, the petitioner i.e. father filed F.C.O.P.No.756 of 2005 before the Family Court at Hyderabad seeking custody of the minor child i.e. first respondent herein and the said OP was allowed on 05.06.2007 and custody of the child was ordered in favour of the petitioner - father. The same was confirmed by this Court in FCA No.93 of 2007. Questioning the said order, the daughter approached the Supreme Court and filed S.L.P. and the same is pending and the order of giving custody of the minor child to the petitioner was suspended by the Supreme Court. 4 It further appears that on the advise of the elders, the matter has been compromised between the parties and both parties agreed to close all the matters pending between them and a memorandum of compromise is filed before this court. The terms of the compromise are as under: i. The petitioner will not claim the custody of the minor child Juveria Moosa, age about 9 years, both the parties herein undertake to report the same in the appeal pending before the Supreme Court and the Appellant shall withdraw the said S.L.P. before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in view of the said compromise. ii. The 1st respondent will not claim maintenance both prior and future maintenance and undertakes not to claim any maintenance in the M.C.No.120 of 2003 and M.P.No.1391 of 2005 on the file of the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the Trial of J.H.B.B.C.-cum-Additional Family Court, Nampally, Hyderabad. The 1st respondent hereby withdraws the same. iii. Both the parties have agreed not to file any cases against each other hereinafter or in future and shall withdraw all the cases. iv. Both the parties will not have any claim in future against each other. 5 Today parties are present before the court and they categorically stated that they entered into compromise and wanted to settle all the disputes pending between them. 6 In the light of the said compromise entered into between the parties, this revision is allowed and the order dated 02.05.2007 passed in M.P.No.1391 of 2005 in M.C.No.120 of 2003 enhancing the maintenance from Rs.750/- to Rs.2,000/- as well as the earlier order dated 24.09.2004 awarding maintenance of Rs.750/- are hereby set aside. ________________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J 20th October 2010 Kvsn