IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.224 of 2008 RENU SINHA @ RANI …PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MANISH KUMAR SARAN SON OF DR. MAHESH KUMAR SARAN …OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 04. 28.02.2011 No body appears on behalf of the petitioner. Counsel for the opposite party is present. Present application has been preferred by the wife questioning the amount of maintenance granted under the impugned order. Learned counsel for the opposite party submits that during the pendency of this application, the petitioner has again filed an application seeking enhancement in terms of section 127 Cr. P.C. which is pending consideration. This Court is of the view that in view of pendente lite development, the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the present application. The application is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )