IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 5146 of 2011 Date of Decision: 30.8.2011. Arun Kumar --Petitioner Versus State Bank of India & another --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Saurabh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 16.3.2011 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Patiala dismissing the Misc. Appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 2.2.2008 passed by the Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Nabha rejecting the objections filed by the petitioner herein in respect to the execution of a decree passed in favour of respondent no.1-bank. It is admitted case of the petitioner that a decree for recovery of an amount of Rs.1,68,640/- has been passed in favour of the State Bank of India and against the predecessor in interest of the petitioner. Execution of the decree was sought by the respondent-bank in the court of Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Nabha. The petitioner and his brother Tarun Kumar filed two separate objection petitions in respect to the execution of the decree. The objection petitions have been rejected by the Executing Court and the appeal preferred therefrom also resulted into dismissal by the learned Additional District Judge, Patiala vide order dated 16.3.2011. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement that the petitioner is ready to deposit the entire C.R. No. 5146 of 2011 -2- decretal amount including interest for which some time is asked for. The offer seems to be genuine. In this view of the matter, without interfering with the orders impugned, it is directed that the sale of the house of the petitioner shall remain in abeyance subject to deposit of the amount as mentioned in the decree i.e. Rs.1,68,640/-, within one month from today and the interest accrued upon the amount within a period of two months thereafter. On failure of the petitioner to deposit the decretal amount in the above manner, the Executing Court shall be at liberty to sell the property in accordance with law. Petition disposed of. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 30.8.2011. lucky