E '<? HSOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Laxmi Narayan Rathiya Aged about 41 Years, S/o. Shri Jeth Singh Rathiya, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Kafarmar, Block Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, OlstS.- Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director Public Instruction DepartmentRaipur(C.G.) 2. District Educatlon Offjcer Raigarh District -Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Block Education Offlcsr Kharsla District - Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department Raigarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (Wiit Petition under Articte 226 ofthe ConstlSution of India) Sinale Bench: Hon'bleJusticeSatishK. Aanjhotri Present : ShriAnil Mourya, Advocateforthe petitionsr. ShriYashwantSinghThakur,Govt.Advocateforthe State/respodents. ;R (Passed on 2nd Juiy, 2007) > The question of law involved is as to whether the petitioner is entitled So regular payscate w.e.T. the date ofinitia! appointment orfrom the date ofcompteSion of probation period. 2. Learned counsei appearing for ths petitioner as well as forthe respondentsi'State jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the presentwrit petition are fhe same to that of in W.P. (S) No.5976/2006 (Sushi! Tlwari and others Vs. State Govsrnment of Chhattisgarh and others), which was allowsd vide order dated 7.11.2006. 3. In view of She above-stated submissions made by learned counset appearing for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms subject to verification ofthe facts. No order as to costs. Indu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ;<£ ^SS=S3tx,fSf^s»tv ;, - '^:.-^'