IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24678 of 2010 DINBANDHU SINGH . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 14.07.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner stands charged with offences punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier considered and rejected by this court vide order dated 26.10.2009 passed in Cr.Misc.No. 34922 of 2009. The petitioner has been identified by the informant who fired at his son and which gunshot injury proved fatal as the son died during the course of treatment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial has already been started and some witnesses have also been examined, who have not supported the case of the prosecution. He further submits that as the petitioner has remained in custody since 24.6.2008, his prayer requires reconsideration. He further submits that the identification of the petitioner in 2 the torch light makes the identification doubtful. The case of the petitioner has been considered and rejected on merits on the earlier occasion and I find no fresh reasons to reconsider the same. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. The bail application is dismissed. The trial Court would be advised to expedite the trial. Bibhash ( Jyoti Saran, J.)