(/0 ‘f/IM C IN THE HIGH COURT 0? JUDICATURE: AT BILASPUR Writ Peition No. f3§g /2001 PET IT IONER Ashokv Kumar Chandrakar , S/o Shri Krishna Kumar Chandrakar , aged about 4O years, ' resident of M. Jamgaon, Teh Patan, Di sttict— Durg. —Ver SuS - State of Chhati sgarh, through— Sécret ary ‘ Department ofx Fore st ,1 Raipur . State of Madhya E’radesh, through- Secretary, Deptt . o£ For‘est,‘Bhopal . (3) Licencing Authy/Di‘vionl.Forest- Officer, Durg (Chhatisgarh). x PETITION UNDER ARTICLE-2 6/227 CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ,e 1 wwwizcvww’ cw :.J.C , HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri,_J. Present :- Shri Anil Pandey, Advocate for the petitiOner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. .. r ORDER (Passed on this 17"‘day of November, 201 1) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed an application 'vvay back in 1995, which has not yet been considered and decided by the respondent authorities. ,Thu‘s, the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh application to consider his case for renewal, in accordance with law. Shri Sao, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the State submits that if the application is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be . considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible. In view of the above, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner nothing surviVes in this petition fcsadjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. i ' W“"”5R, I r g Sdl— i Satish K. Agnihotri i Judge I t i WRIT PETITION NO.1996 OF 200.1 PETITIONER Ashok Kum’ar Chandra‘kar Versus V’ ‘ I RESPONDENTS State of