IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH JUNE 2008 / 4TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 25420 of 2007(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ RADHALAKSHMI C.T., KILIYANGATTIL HOUSE, MADASSERI, MALAPPURAM. (WORKING AS TYPIST GRADE-I, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LOCAL FUND AUDIT, DISTRICT OFFICE, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. THE DIRECTOR, LOCAL FUND AUDIT, OFFICE OF THE LOCAL FUND AUDIT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. P.C. MUHAMMED, TYPIST GRADE-I, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LOCAL FUND AUDIT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY AUDIT, MALAPPURAM. BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NANDAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 25420 of 2007 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE ADVICE MEMO DATED 16.4.02 EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF THE REGULARISATION OF APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 19.12.02 EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 24.7.04 EXT.P3(a)- TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL SENIORITY LIST DATED 24.7.04 EXT.P4- TRUE COPY OF THE PROMOTION ORDER DATED 18.9.06 EXT.P5- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PROMOTING THE PETITIONER AS TYPIST GRADE I DATED 17.11.06 EXT.P6- TRUE COPY OF ONE OF THE REQUEST MADE BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 2.2.07 EXT.P7- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 3.5.07 EXT.P8- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.2.07 EXT.P8(a)- TRUE COPY OF THE PROVISIONAL SENIORITY LIST DATED 17.2.07 EXT.P9- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 2.6.07 (TRUE COPY) P.A TO JUDGE V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).25420/2007 -------------------- Dated this the 25th day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner, who is working as Typist Grade-II in the Local Fund Audit, approached this Court challenging the provisional seniority lists, Exts.P8 and P8(a) in which the third respondent was assigned seniority above the petitioner. During the pendency of the writ petition, a final seniority list has been published re-assigning the rank, in so far as the petitioner and the third respondent are concerned. Petitioner is now apparently treated as senior and Ext.P10 order has been passed in this regard. In the circumstances, no further grievance survives in so far as the petitioner is concerned, in this writ petition. Second respondent shall take further action pursuant to Ext.P10. Writ petition is disposed of as above. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs