1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1419 of 2010 Maruti D. Kanchan ....Petitioner Vs. The Collector, Pune & ors. ....Respondents Mr. Y.A. Sakhare i/b. M/s. YKS Legal for the petitioner. Mr. V.S.Gokhale, AGP for respondent nos. 1-5. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND R.M.SAVANT, JJ DATED:- March 26, 2010 P.C. Heard Counsel for the petitioner. Perused the decision of the Collector, Pune. It is noticed that for similar grievance, Petitioner had resorted to proceedings which were brought right upto this Court. The said decision has become final. The Petitioner, however, relies on the observations made in the impugned decision of the Collector. On the basis of some observations made, the fragmentation proceedings which have attained finality cannot be reopened. Further, the relief claimed in this Petition is only to call upon this Court to direct the Respondents 1-4 to place the record and proceedings of the allotment of land in respect of Gat No. 514/2 situated at Uralikanchan, Tal. Haveli, Dist. Pune. Merely producing the record before this Court without asking for further relief, the Petition itself is ill 2 advised. Even assuming that the Petitioner could have amended the prayer clause in the Writ Petition and asked for further relief, considering the reasons recorded by the Collector in the impugned decision, no interference is warranted. Dismissed. (R.M. SAVANT, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)