1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 3787 OF 2010. Santosh Tukaramji Wadiwa -: VERSUS :- Sou. Vandana Santosh Wadiwa Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : AUGUST 23, 2010. Heard Shri R. Chhabra, learned Counsel for petitioner. Contention is, respondent – wife is earning and that has been ignored while granting her maintenance. It is pointed out that the Family Court itself has found that there is nothing on record to ascertain income of petitioner/ husband. Except this statement, in specific pleadings in Written Statement that petitioner is of quarrelsome nature and therefore, cannot retain the job, is also pointed out. Leaned Counsel further states that proceedings under Section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code are also filed. However, learned Counsel fairly stated that in the 2 proceedings under Section 125, no orders are as yet passed. It is apparent that, when ever those orders are passed, the impugned orders can be looked into by the concerned Court. Here the Family Court has noticed that there is nothing on record to show income of petitioner has able bodied person and hence the sum of Rs. 1000/- has been awarded as interim maintenance. In written statement, respondent has stated that petitioner had forced her to work as maid servant during her joint stay. That stand cannot be stretched to mean that even today she has got some source of income. Looking to the circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. Proceedings under Section A- 73/2009 are expedited and the Family Court shall attempt to decide the same at the earliest. Writ Petition is disposed of with above directions, with no orders as to costs. JUDGE Rgd.