IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14066 of 2003 BRIJ KISHORE MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6. 08.02.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner assails the order dated 24.12.2002 terminating his appointment by holding that it was outright an illegal appointment inter alia no advertisement etc. had been published. Learned Counsel for the petitioner finds it difficult to press this application in view of the fact that in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka Vrs Uma Devi, one time direction was for considering those appointed irregularly and not illegally. The writ application is dismissed with the observation that if the respondents advertise and the petitioner applies to the same also his case is required to be considered on its merit when it is expected that the respondents will appropriately consider has past work experience etc. in accordance with law as also the age relaxation but strictly in accordance with law. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)