1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 160 OF 2010. Indubai Harachand Waghmare -: versus :- Laxmanrao Ramchandra Dhage and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 24 , 2010. Heard Shri R.N. Badhe, learned counsel for petitioner and Shri V.K. Gulhane, leaned counsel for respondents. Petitioner/plaintiff contend that after he closed evidence, defendants came up with an application for amendment to written statement to urge that plaintiff has sold the suit property on 03.07.2009 for a consideration of Rs. 17,90,000/- to one Akash Dinesh Shivhare and as plaintiff has no interest in it as owner. The fact of sale was denied by petitioner and still the Trial Court has allowed amendment to be carried out. Before me, learned counsel has urged that thee was no document before the trial Court to gather that there was any such sale on 03.07.2009. It was not necessary for the trial Court to go into the merits of the controversy at the stage of allowing the amendment. When the amendment has been allowed, it is 2 apparent that the trial Court will proceed further in accordance with law and also give petitioner/plaintiff appropriate opportunity to rebut the contentions of respondents/defendants. No case is made out warranting interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is dismissed with no order as to cost. JUDGE Rgd.