HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR HON'BLE MR. T.P. SHARMA & HON'BLE MR. R. L. JHANWAR. JJ. Mjsc. Appeal ( CS No. 526 OF 2010 2. 4. Siat. DhanTnoti Bai, aged about 32 years, Wd/0 Late Ashwani Kuinar Soni. Miaor Basaiit Kumar, aged about 14 years, S/o Late ShriAshwaai Kuinar Sotii. Miuor Ku. Hemlata, aged about 13 years, D/0 Late Shri Ashwani Kumar Soni. Miuor Basant Kumar, aged about 11 JCcLLS, o/.n v5^ V^ l^clUC Q1-.^~i OliJ.l A fT.'l^h^^Trf-h-t-l-a ?<3,iii. Kum.ar Soni; AppeUant No. 2 to 4 fhroiigh fheir natural Guatdian Mother Siut. Dhanoniati Bai, Wd/0 Late Shri Ashwaai Ki-miar Soni, AU are by Caste Sonar, R/0 Villa^e aad Post- Siughaaptir, Police Station Basna, Tahsfl SaraipaU., District Mahasaiauiid (C.G.). Smt. Bijli Bai W/0 Shri Binda Prasad Soui, a^ed about 55 years, R/0 ViUage-DongripaU, Police Station Pithora, Talisil and District Maliasamund (C.G.). Rajesh Miri, S/0 Lateluram Miri, aged about 29 years, R/0 Dr. Rajendra Nagar, CivU. Liues, Police Station-Civil Line, Raipur, District Raipur(C.G.). The New India Insuraace Coiapany Limited, Through Divisional Ofiice, The New India lusurance Com.paay Limited, Madina Buildiag, Jail Road, Raipur, Distnct-Raipur, (C.G.) Insurcr of Accidental Vehicle Maniti Vaa bearing No. C.G. 04-B/1488 of In.suratice Cotnpaiiy, Policy No. 450308/31/02/07380, Period dated 11.09.2002 to 10.09.2003. ^ ~^"Ko^^r^^.':\—^ APPEAL UHDER SECTION 173 OF MOTOR VEHCILE ACT. Presenfc- Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate for fhe appeUaats. Slui Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate for fhe respondeat No. 2. ORAL-JUDGEMENT (Passedon 30/07/2010) The followine iudgment of the Court was passed bv T.P. ,J:- By this appeal appellants have challenged the legality and propriety of the award dated 2/5/2009 passed by Principal Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Mahasamund (in short the Tribunal') in claim case No. 44/2006. During the course of argument leamed counsel for the appellants submits that he seeks to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file claim petition in tenns of under Sections 163-A or 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Prayer is allowed. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge Sd/- R.L. Jhanwar Judge