IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 15TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 24TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 32899 of 2010(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.MANI, MEENA BHAVAN, KUNNUKUZHI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695 005. 3. THE LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER & DEPUTY COLLECTOR(LA),THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695 005. 4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA BY SRI.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR, SC FOR KSRTC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N. RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.32899 of 2010 ------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner, his wife and son jointly owned a parcel of land in Pettah Village in Thiruvananthapuram Taluk. A building was in existence in the said property. It was acquired by the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation for establishing a Mini Bus stand. The grievance voiced by the petitioner is that though possession of the building and land was taken over together with the movables kept in the building, ignoring the request made by the petitioner for time upto 30.11.2010 to vacate the building, notwithstanding the submission of Ext.P5 representation, the movables taken over have not been returned. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the fourth respondent to consider Ext.P5 representation and to return the movables and records kept in the building, which was acquired by the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation. 2. When the writ petition came up for admission on 4.11.2010, the learned standing counsel appearing for the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation submitted that the petitioner can collect the movables kept in the office of the fourth respondent at any time. When the writ petition came up for admission-hearing today, the learned standing counsel submitted that the movables were W.P.(C) No.32899 of 2010 2 collected on 11.11.2010 and that the petitioner has no subsisting grievance. In the light of the said submission, no further orders are called for in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly closed as infructuous. P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. nj.