IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.856 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Teetu ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: September 22, 2010 __________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.94 of 2010 Under Sections 302, 120B IPC, P.S. Jhebreda, District Haridwar ______________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. K.S. Verma, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. GA for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is not named in the FIR and the case rests upon the circumstantial evidence and chain of circumstances is not complete against the applicant to connect him with the alleged crime. Even the alleged incident was happened on 25.6.2010 and on that day the applicant was in jail and he was released from jail after the said incident. After considering all the facts and circumstances; on hearing learned counsel for the parties; on perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Teetu be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Haridwar. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 22.9.2010 RG