HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.16835 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.09.2011 **** Satvinder Singh Kang . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. GS Chahal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. BS Chahal, DAG, Punjab **** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner is working as Gram Sewak who has been transferred from Patiala to Block Bhawanigarh vide the impugned transfer order dated 14.09.2010 (Annexure P5). It appears that earlier also the petitioner had approached this Court against his previous transfer order. (2). Having regard to the fact that the transfer is an incidence of service and it does not affect the service conditions in any manner, no case to interfere with the impugned transfer order is called for. However, if there are mitigating circumstances warranting sympathetic consideration for the petitioner’s retention at Patiala, he shall be at liberty to represent to the competent authority, who shall consider the same sympathetically. (3). Disposed of accordingly. Dasti. CWP No.16835 of 2010.doc - 2 – 14.09.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge 2