IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 8TH ASWINA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 7463 of 2011() ---------------------------------- (CRIME NO.774/2011 OF PEECHY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT) ..... PETITIONER --------------- ANIL.K.PAPPACHAN, AGED 35, S/O. PAPPACHAN, KAINIKKARA HOUSE, CHUVANNAMANNU.P.O., PEECHY VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT-680652. BY ADVS. SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE SRI.ADEEP ANWAR SRI.K.H.ASHARAF SMT.RENJINI RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEECHY POLICE STATION, PEECHY. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs V. RAMKUMAR, J. ................................... Bail Application No.7463 of 2011 ........................................................... Dated this the 30th day of September, 2011 O R D E R In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the first accused in Crime No.774/2011 of Peechy Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 498 A I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail. 2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. 3. After evaluating the factors and parameters which are to be taken into consideration in the light of paragraph 122 of the verdict dated 2-12-2010 of the Apex Court in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra and Others (2010 (4) KLT 930) , I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the above case on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent Bail A.No.7463/2011 -:2:- sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction to the said officer and subject to the following conditions: 1. The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays. 2. The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation including custodial interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer. 3. Petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution. 4. Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail. 5. The bail granted pursuant to this order shall be in force till the end of the trial of the case unless and until it is cancelled by this Court in accordance with paragraph 103 of the verdict in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre's case (supra). If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above. Dated this the 30th day of September, 2011. V.RAMKUMAR,JUDGE ln