IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.7127 OF 2011 TALEBAR YADAV @ TALESHWAR RAI,S/O LATE KHULI RAI, R/O VILLAGE BHUAPUR, P.S PANDARAK, DIST. PATNA. …………………PETITIONER. VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR. ………………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 03/ 28.09.2011 Heard counsel for the petitioner. No one appears for the State. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected vide order dated 19.11.2009 in Criminal Miscellaneous No.39845 of 2009, with an observation that the petitioner could renew his prayer for bail after a period of one year, if in the meantime, the trial of the petitioner did not get concluded. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial of the petitioner has not made any headway. This Court earlier by an order dated 12.05.2011 had not only directed the petitioner to file a supplementary affidavit as with regard to the criminal antecedent but had also called for a report from the Court below as to the present stage of trial. The trial Court in its report dated 2 01.06.2011, has mentioned that though the charges were framed against the petitioner on 30.04.2010, the prosecution has not produced any witness till date. Keeping in view the aforementioned aspect and also the fact that the petitioner is in custody since, 21.07.2009 i.e for a period of over two years and that the petitioner claims that he has got no criminal antecedent, this Court would direct for release of the petitioner, namely, Talebar Yadav on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-1st, Barh in connection with Pandarak P.S case no. 25 of 2005 in Sessions Trial No. 298 of 2010 subject to the following three conditions:- i) The two bail bonds will be furnished, one by the Government servant and the other by a close family relative. (ii) The petitioner will remain present in course of trial on each and every day and his absence even 3 for a single day would automatically entail the consequences of cancellation of his bail. (iii) The petitioner in case is now made accused in any other criminal case,that would itself lead to cancellation of his bail. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)