IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.4940/2010 Sudheer Jain Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 12/07/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. Anoop Dhand for accused petitioner Mr. Amit Punia Public Prosecutor for the State Mr. Manish Kumawat for the complainant ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner-husband at the stage of investigation by the Police in the FIR lodged at the instance of complainant wife, for offence under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC. It is contended by the learned counsel for the accused petitioner that petitioner is a Government servant and the normal dispute between the husband and wife has been given the shape of criminal case, involving offence under the penal code. Otherwise also the parents of the accused petitioner took all the items received in dowry to the Police Station, but the Police did not accept the same. Earlier, this Court called the husband and wife both and today both are present in the Court. Wife is represented by her Advocate Mr. Manish Kumawat. Both have now amicably settled the dispute and are living their lives together peacefully. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner under-takes not to ill treat his wife in future and would try to maintain cordial relations with her. Having regard to the facts that dispute between the husband and wife has been settled amicably; there is a child of 3 years out of this wedlock; the petitioner is a Government servant, their family life should not be further disturbed and in view of the under-taking given by the counsel for the petitioner, I feel inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Resultantly, the bail application is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Sudheer Jain S/O Late Prem Prakash Jain in FIR No. 47/2010 Mahila Police Station, Jaipur City (east) he shall be released on bail by the concerned SHO/Investigating Officer, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties of Rs. 15,000/- each to his satisfaction on the following conditions: - 1) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; 2) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and 3) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (Mohammad Rafiq), J. Thanvi