THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.3047 of 2010 Dated: 01.06.2010 Between: Kandi Madhava Reddy .. Petitioner. And The Joint Collector, Karimnagar District, and others. .. Respondents. ORDER: The petitioner and his wife claim to be in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land admeasuring Ac.20.20 gts. in Sy.No.692 situated at Chenjarla village of Manakondur Mandal, Karimnagar District, having purchased the same from one Basabattula Venkati @ Venkatesham by virtue of a registered sale deed bearing doc.No.5943/1994, dated 29.12.1994, and they got mutated their names in the revenue records. While so, the 4th respondent filed an appeal in Appeal No.D/1304/2008 before the 2nd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, Karimnagar District, for cancellation of the pattadar pass books/title deeds issued in favour of the petitioner and his wife, and the same was allowed by orders dated 29.08.2009. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner, his wife and two others filed revision on 29.09.2009 before the 1st respondent-Joint Collector, Karimnagar District, and the same is pending adjudication. The petitioner contends that pending disposal of the revision filed by him before the 1st respondent, when the 3rd respondent-Tahsildar, Manakondur Mandal, Karimnagar, made attempts to alter the entries pertaining to the subject land in the pahanies, he got issued a legal notice dated 03.12.2009 to the 3rd respondent bringing to his notice about the pendency of the revision filed by him and not to make any alterations in the pahanies. The petitioner complains that the 3rd respondent, in spite of receiving the said legal notice by him, deleted the entries, pertaining to the subject land, in pattadar column of the pahanies relating to the years 2001 onwards. Hence, the petitioner filed this writ petition seeking appropriate directions. While issuing notice before admission on 11.02.2010, this Court granted interim stay of all proceedings in pursuance of the order dated 29.08.2009, including the alterations if any, made by the 3rd respondent, until further orders. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the revision petition filed by the petitioner before the 1st respondent is still pending, and the same was admitted to by the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 3 and also the learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent and all of them agreed to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: “The 1st respondent-Joint Collector, Karimnagar District, is directed to dispose of the revision petition preferred by the petitioner against the orders dated 29.08.2009 passed by the 2nd respondent, as per law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA,J 01.06.2010 v v