IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.56 OF 2008 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.915 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.955 OF 2003 Prakash Nathyaba Bhosale ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Ms.Pallavi Dabholkar i/b Mr.G.S.Godbole for Applicant. Mr.M.B.Kale i/b Mr.U.B.Nighot for Respondent No.3 ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JULY 24, 2008. JULY 24, 2008. JULY 24, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the Applicant. Except stating that attempt to serve the Respondents 11A to 11F has failed and the remark mentioned by the Bailiff is "not found", no other material facts are stated so as to justify substituted service. 2. In the circumstances, Civil Application : 2 : No.56 of 2008 is rejected with liberty to the Applicant to serve Respondents 11A to 11F afresh. That be done by Advocate’s notice, either personally or by courier/speed post/ e-mail/fax and affidavit of service be filed on or before 12th August 2008. 3. If steps are taken in time, Civil Application No.915 of 2004 in Writ Petition No.955 of 2003 be listed on 14th August 2008. Civil Application No.57 of 2008 be also listed on that date. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.