IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4113 of 2009 Rabindra Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 03. 18.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the State stating therein that the order has been complied with by passing appropriate order as per Memo No. 1871 dated 13th of December 2005. As such, this contempt application need not proceed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner was required to be considered in light of the extant circular of the Personal and Administrative Reforms Department (General Administration) vide resolution no. 489 dated 10th of May 2005, whereby the cut of date i.e. 01.08.1985 has been extended to 11th of December 1990 and it is not in dispute that the petitioner did work for more than 240 days prior to the extended cut of date, as such, case of the petitioner ought to have been considered. It is further submitted that notwithstanding the extended cut of date, the authorities are required to pass specific order either accepting the representation of the petitioner or rejecting the claim of the petitioner. Although in the show cause statement has been made that the petitioner did not complete 240 days prior to the initial cut of date i.e. 01.08.1995. However, petitioner has not been communicated any such order. Since the order of this court has been complied with, this contempt application need not proceed further. However, such decision be communicated to the petitioner. The M.J.C. application stands disposed of. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)