1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.2 OF 2010 IN MISC. PETITION NO.71 OF 2007 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.316 OF 1982 Vaikunthrai @ Yogendra Amaratlal Bhatt. Vs. Udayson of Kanalyalal Bhatt and ors. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Prothonotary/ Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr. Sanjay Jain along with Ms. Sonal i/by Zohair & Co. for the petitioner. Mr. P.M.Shah for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr.J.J.Shah for the Respondent Nos. 3 to 5. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 30th July, 2010 P.C. :- 1 Heard both sides. In view of what was recorded in my order dated 9.7.2010 and in compliance of what was stated by the Advocate for the respondent Nos. 3 to 5 who were assignees in the documents dated 2 11.8.2009 and 8.11.2009, deed of rectification deleting the words ”or 1/8th undivided share in the entire property” in both the aforesaid deeds have been executed. In view of the above, the alleged contempt of the orders passed by this court dated 30.11.2007 and 29.8.2008 has been rectified. The said rectification deeds dated 20.7.2010 and 28.7.2010 have been duly registered. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to entertain this contempt petition though I intend to dispose off the same subject to payment of costs to the petitioner. Contempt petition is therefore, dismissed. However the respondent Nos. 3 to 5 are directed to pay costs quantified at Rs.2000/- to the petitioner, which will be paid through the Advocate for the petitioner within three weeks from today. Copies of the rectification deeds are not taken on record as the 3 copies are furnished to the Advocate for the petitioner. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)