IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 14TH JUNE 2011 / 24TH JYAISHTA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 4232 of 2011() ----------------------------- CMP.3922/2011 of J.M.F.C.-I, CHENGANNUR CR NO.29/2011 OF CHENGANNUR EXCISE RANGE .................... PETITIONER: ACCUSED --------------------------- SUNIL K.R., AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.RAGAVAN, KOLEPPALLATHU VEEDU, ILANJIMEL VADAKKUMURI, ENNAKKADU VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.AJITH MURALI RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.4232 of 2011 --------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of June, 2011. ORDER In this Petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioner who is the sole accused in C.R.No.29 of 2011 of Chengannur Excise Range for an offence punishable under Section 8 (1) & (2) of the Abkari Act for having been found in possession of 10 litres of arrack, seeks his enlargement on bail. Petitioner was arrested on 19/05/2011. 2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. 3. Having regard to the nature of the offence, the duration of judicial custody undergone by the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail with effect from 29/06/2011 on his executing a bond for `35,000/- (Rupees thirty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned and subject to the following conditions:- 1. The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays till the filing of the final report. 2. The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person who is acquainted with the facts of the Bail Appln.No.4232/2011 : 2 : case so as to dissuade him or her from disclosing any information to the court or to the police. 3. The petitioner shall not establish any contact with any of the witnesses or accused in the case. 4. The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution. 5. The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail. 6. The petitioner shall notify his place of residence before executing the bail bond. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above. Dated this the 14th day of June, 2011. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. skj True copy P.A. to Judge