1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2500 OF 2010 Parveshkumar Chunavashankar Singh ...Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ----- Mr.S.J. Shelke i/b. Mr. Rakesh V.Vare for Applicant Mrs. R.V. Newton -APP for State. ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 1ST JULY, 2010 P.C. 1. This is an application filed by the Applicant for extension of time to furnish surety as directed by the Trial Court. 2. In the present case, the Applicant was released on bail on execution of P.R. Bond in a sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety for the said amount. However, while granting bail, the Trial Court was pleased to direct the Applicant to furnish the cash bail of Rs.25,000/- and furnish surety thereafter. 3. According to the Applicant, he was under an 2 impression that he is released on bail on furnishing cash bail and he need not to furnish the surety as directed by the Trial Court. Subsequently, when he came to know this fact, he filed an application in the Trial Court for extension of time. The said application, however, is rejected. 4. In my view, taking into consideration the reason given by the Applicant for not furnishing the surety as directed by the Trial Court, no prejudice would be caused to the prosecution if some more time is given to the Applicant to furnish the surety. 5. Hence, impugned order passed by the Sessions Court is set aside. Four weeks time is given to the Applicant to furnish the surety as directed by the Trial Court. 6. Application is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE J.)