IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2841 OF 2001 (SS) (Old No. 41172 of 1999) Jogendra ………….Petitioner. Versus Mukhya Pashu Chikitsadhikari, Chamoli and others. ……..Respondents. Mr. Anil Dabral, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand. 20th October, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. Anil Dabral, Advocate for petitioner and Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand. An objection has been raised by Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand that the matter involves disputed questions of fact, which cannot be raised in the present writ petition and the remedy before the petitioner is to file a petition before the Public Service Tribunal. Mr. Anil Dabral, learned counsel for the petitioner has also given a statement at the bar that he wishes to withdraw the writ petition as he wants to pursue the remedy before the Public Service Tribunal. On the basis of the above two statements, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 20.10.2009 Rathour