HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5399 OF 2010 ORDER: The Respondent filed O.S. No.41 of 2002 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, against the petitioner, for the relief of partition and separate possession of the suit schedule properties. The trial of the suit commenced and it appears that the evidence was reopened at one stage. Petitioner filed I.A. No.450 of 2010, with a prayer to reopen the evidence to enable him to mark certain documents in original. 2. It is stated that on the earlier occasion, secondary of the same documents was filed, on account of the non-availability of the originals and since the originals have come to the custody of the petitioner, the same need to be placed before this court. The application was opposed by the respondent. The trial Court dismissed the I.A. through order, dated 18-09-2010. Hence, this revision. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. The suit is of the year 2002. It was identified for disposal. It is not as if the petitioner was not given an opportunity to lead evidence. Even according to him, he was permitted to lead secondary evidence also. The mere fact that he came into possession of the originals, does not constitute a ground to reopen the evidence. Further, if the trial Court refused to take into account the secondary evidence that is already adduced by the petitioner, he can certainly file the originals, at the stage of appeal by filing an application under Rule - 27 of Order – XXXXIX CPC. The suit cannot be kept pending any further. 5. The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J November 26, 2010. KTL