,••• IN THE HI6H COURT OF JUbICATURE AT BILASPUR Cr. Revision ^-^>)S /2011 PETITIONER: ^^y ^' E < ^..^^ ^ '^^^' •y%^^ ^' l.Ramesh Kumar S/o Kanhaiya Lal Jangde, Caste Satnami, Agedabout45years,R/o Kasaridih Durg, Tah <& Dist.Durg (C6) Z.Jiterdra Kumar Yadav S7o Late Naroyan l-al Yadav, aged about 36 years, R/o Khamariya, PS- Utai, TahA bist.Durg (C6) S.Mhd.Raza, S/o Late Shri Munshi Raza, aged about 52 years, R/o Raza Fire works Kasaridih, Tah & &ist.t)urg (C6) RESPONDENT: VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through: P.S. Utai, Oist.Durg (C.6.) CRIM'ERXt-REVISION UNbER SECTION 397READ WITH SECTION 401 OF THE CO&E OF CRIMINAL PROCEbURE. .3 T^ XI-HC-22 TS •^n'qRra, dTTl+l'ld. fadl'My 111CTI ShtllcR sn^?r xrarg; _U.:RC..PR).l.t.^l.ti I^^T" M 2.TP^ ^82]^n sn^r^ R-ti'f 311^1 ?f)^Iqi ^ifid ..-.^. sn^r ?wit?T titeci S.B: HON'BLE JUSTICE MR. PRIT 03-05-2011: Even after the matter was ct appeared for the petitioners, there^ire Court has no other option but to prosecution. Accordingly, therevision fsdi^ .^- chl^I<rt-4ll <Hl*l<rff'^ fe*<^ <^>i4^R ^3lPg»T31I^[ NKERDIWAKER alied in the second round, none », in these circumstances.'this dismiss the revision for want of missed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge [•q0 ••iTF"'