IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13573 of 2010 1. Tunni Devi, D/o Narayan Paswan 2. Puja Kumari, D/o Sheo Paswan 3. Narayan Paswan S/o Late Bangali Paswan …….Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar …………………………..Opposite Party ----------- 2 13.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a police case registered Sections 366, 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned Sessions Judge has rejected the bail application on the ground that Dy. Superintendent of Police and Superintendent of Police, Lakhisarai have found no evidence against the petitioners, hence it was recorded by the learned Sessions Judge that there is no apprehension of arrest of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioners has produced certified copy of statement recorded under Section 164 Cr. P.C. of the victim girl, which may be taken on the record in which she has made allegations only against Dharma and there is now whisper against the petitioners. In that view of the fact that victim in 164 Cr. P.C. has not named the petitioners , let the petitioners (1) Tunni Devi (2) Puja Kumari and (3) Narayan Paswan, be released on anticipatory bail on their surrender before the learned Court below 2 within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Surajgarha (Medinichouki) P.S. Case No. 361 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. MKchy (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)