IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1164 of 2011 GUDDU SINGH @ GUDDU KUMAR SINGH, SON OF SRI NAGENDRA SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 22.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Muffassil P.S. Case No. 125 of 2010 registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Although, petitioner is not named in the First Information Report but it appears from perusal of the impugned order of learned Sessions Judge that the petitioner was arrested in course of investigation and he was put on Test Identification Parade in which the informant identified the petitioner as one of the culprits of this case. Although, learned counsel for the petitioner tried to convince me about the innocence of the petitioner by placing this fact that the above stated Test Identification Parade had been held after two months from the date of remand of the petitioner in jail custody but I am not, at all, convinced with the above stated submission. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, the prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )