IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, CHHATTISTGARH at BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION N04^^/2006. ^R Fa ?:')ttTap-.S" iL£Bti'li PETITIONER \-^.-r' .<9CA.k'^' s^8-&- ^^ .•:«•• »»" Ganga Ram Sahu S/p Shri. RamNath Sahu Aged arouad 65 years, Ex.-BSP employee. Residing at: Behind Tarun Talkies, Near Sahu Floor Mill, Santra Badi, DURG-490001 (CG). RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD, Through : Its Chairman, .- Steel Authority oflndia Ltd. Lodhi Road, Ispat Bhawan, NEW DELm-110011. ^&K/ BmLAI STEEL PLANT, . Through : Its Managmg Director, Bhilai Steel Plant, Ispat Bhawan, BHILAI - 490001 District: Durg (CG). The Sr. Manager (Personnel) Recruitment Section, Bhilai Steel Plant, BHILAI - 490001 District: Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE 1SSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER AND DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY, MANDAMUS^TC. XI-HC-78 'ssi 'iiMicf'M, aTOtrKo, Rfciiuy MWdl stiNlcb ••y-^--^-8'^^^ 200 ^ 3li^<i Ma«i(li<:>t^<s«<<(') an^wqiTf^iw aWSIT^TsbHl* CTgRRtrf^cTSn^T 19-6-: Heard Mr. B.P. Rao, couns^l for the petitioner. By the instant writ petition ijnder Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed the the case of his son for compa^sionate appointment on account of his retirement on medical ground. The case of the petitioner i^ Assistant in the Pathology Depa|lment of Bhilai Steel Plant (respondent No.2). Subsequently, the petition^r suffered from certain medical diseases and other atlied problems. He wa^ long time and ultimatety, he was job by the Medicat Board of Bhilai| was relieved from the duties on 11 submitted an apptication dated 28- appointment of his son. The peti Office of respondent No.3 several compassionate appointment, wi ,th Agreement dated 29'" Juiy, 1979, the respondents, the petitioner +i''<F<'i<fl-i *ii*«iT^"tet^<Ri't<;i< ^ari^irsn^T t respondent No.3 be directed to consider that the petitioner was emptoyed as Lab. treated at Bhilai Steel Plant Hospital for a teclared Permanent IVIedical Unfit for the Steel Plant. Based on that, the petitioner 3-1-1999 and on that basis, the petitioner i1-19% (Annexure P-2) for compassionate poner's son himself also approached the itimes. Even after the lapse of 6-7 years, the respondenfs have not consid^red the case of the petitioner's son for iereas, as per the Memorandum of ^pplicable in the Steel Authority including |s son is entitled for compassionate appointment. Learned counsel for the p^titioner submitted that on similar ground number of persons have been aj)pointed on compassionate appointment, whereas, the case ofthe petitione|''s son isnot being considered inspite of the application submitted by the p^titioner for compassionate appointment of his son. Therefore, the respondei^ts be directed to consider the application of the petitioner and pass appropri^te order in the matter. -<zF XI-HC-78 3^? •^l'lllcl'4, »Tfl<rl'l<o, RKIK-I^. . (A3.' *II*IMI a»*ii<»> •JW^ 200^ 311^!»14^cb('i'li^VT) 3[i^r?irR-i tTOT 311^1 stiMI* Soma <- ?TgTWHfer3n^T Having heard learned coun^e the petition and the documents, th< fair and reasonable. Therefore, re4| application submitted by the petitioj son and pass final order on the petitioner's son for compassionatj policy of respondent No.1. With the direction aforesaid, Parties are entitled for certiNd .el for the petitioner and having perused prayer made by learned counsel is just, pondent No.3 is directed to scrutinize the ier for compassionate appointment of his application considering the case of the appointment, in accordance with the he petition stands disposed of. copy of this order. °bi'li[<'f''fl-i t(i*«iTfftetA'<Ri+4i<. ^73ri^>T3:n^T Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge ^•^ .y '.3" v