IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38569 of 2008 UPENDRA SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR - - - - 2. 9.9.2008 Heard. After having heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, I am not inclined to reconsider the prayer which was earlier rejected by an order passed in Cr. Misc. No. 38642 of 2007. On perusal of the rejection order passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court V, Vaishali at Hajipur, it is found that the learned Judge has fixed a timeframe for himself of disposing of the case by December, 2008 in the light of the undertaking of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor to produce the witnesses. This Court will be happy if the learned trial Judge could really dispose of the case by December, 2008 and that happiness will further please the Court if the Additional Public Prosecutor really co-operate with the court in producing the witnesses. Still, I want to instruct the learned Judge to go through the decision of 2 the Apex Court rendered in Shailendra Kumar Vs. State of Bihar: A.I.R. 2002 S.C. 270 and issue a notice to the officer-in-charge of the concerned Police Station by appending a list of witnesses thereto and directing him to remain physically present with the witnesses in the court on each and every date of hearing. The petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)