IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR li.ali MISC. CIVIL CASE N0 3^ OF 2011 APPLICANT PETIT10NER ^^y ..•••"'"^v T0^""" o' v Rajesh Kumar Shrivastava, S/o Shri P.L. Shrivastava, aged about 49 years, working as Battery Attendant (Samuha Paricharak), Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, Ambikapur, District, Surguja (C.G.) Resident of gandhinagar, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS RESPONDENTS l'%1^ \^\ litsx^!li ^ %\ 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. The Collector, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 3. The Deputy Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 4. Suresh Kumar Gupta, Assistant Grade-111, Office of Deputy Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 5. Lalit Kumar Jagat, Assistant Grade -III, Office of Deputy Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 6. Ku. Swati, Assistant Grade -III, Office of Deputy Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) ^ APPLICATION FOR nflODIFICATION OF ORDER DATED 09/08/2010 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P. (S) N0. 4319/2010 s an^r^i ^sn^t WlIWH^d TST •^l-itldl, 'S^OTS, 1»!C!1'M1< Tn ,c,c,(^- .zg>/2^i) sn^i'g^nwHfN SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra IVIot 27-01^011 Shri Harshwardhan, couns^l Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Heard. Learned counsel for tha 09-08-2010 passed by this Court| No.S-Deputy Director, Pancha^ Ambikapur (In the writ petition]) appropriate decision on the his claim for grant of scale period. It is submitted that on 25-( ooncerned respondent along wit| Court but even after expiry of Wf Learned oounsel for the petitun^ order of the Court required the the petitioner's representation respondent authority has not con^ monttis. On the other hand, learneitl the nature of grievance of the been undue delay in deciding the| has no objection ifthis Court Taking into considering the| the parties as also considering th^ (in the writ petition) to consider th| '*l'i<ifl'i|1-l 'qTqcTf ^ ^SV ^S^ZK ^? aipgi; sii^t an Shrivastava, J. for the petitioner. Adlvocate for the State. ||>etitioner submits that vide order dated |in W.P.(S)No.4319 of 2010, respondent ifat and Social Welfare Department, was directed to consider and take repr^sentatton of the petitioner with regard to promoflon/regular promotion within a reasonable P8-2010, representation was made to the (i the copy of the order passed by this te months, no decision has been taken. fr further submitted that the spirit of the C(j)ncerned respondent to take decision on Iwithin a reasonable period, but the ^idered the same even after lapse of five State oounsel submits that considering p^titioner, it cannot be said that there has Imatter. Learned State oounsel, however, )ixes|time limit for complianoe ofthe order. i submission made by learned counsel for jit this Court direoted the respondent No.3 claim of the petitioner for grant of scale [Tft^^feq SI-H8:-22 aii^r'^i h-i sy^l sn^ii^ ^ffer .K Tumsnei -S^ -^MM-il, d'dl'y'tti, 'fadl'Hy WWff%tll°b ^n,c.c.nA,,i§>/-^-)i ^...............................y....^ 498— Wt}U promotion/r^ular promotion, it It is now directed that the respond]er Social Welfare Department, Aml|)ikapur petitioner's representation either Court order dated 09-08-2010 wittti date of recejpt of a oopy ofthig'ortfer. dne Accordingly, the petition is cbi''<t<-i<fl-< tipRif'? fe^ <r»]td!< ^aifiOTafl^F Jld be proper to modify the earlier order. ^nt No.S-Deputy Director, Panchayat and shall now take decision on the way or the other in compliance of the |in an outer limit ofthree months from the ]jnatly disposed off. ManindraMS^hrivastava