[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.2171 OF 2008 The State of Maharashtra ..Applicant Vs. Mukesh Nainmal Joshi ..Respondent ... Mr.H.J.Dedia advocate for applicant Mr.Amin Solkar A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. The applicant-State of Maharashtra is seeking cancellation of bail granted to the respondent-original accused no.10. Bail was granted to the respondent in Sessions Case No.348 of 2004 which is pending before the Sessions Court at Thane. The said case pertains to CR No.I-49 of 2004. The said case is under Sections 489 B and C of the IPC. Cancellation of bail has been sought on the merits of the matter. It is an admitted fact that the trial in the said case is almost over and the matter has been kept for judgment. Looking [-2-] to this fact, at this stage, I do not think that this is a fit case to cancel the bail. 3. Application is rejected. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]