('<vcy c? IN THE HIGH^OURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR rC.G.1 Writ PetitionNo.^^^^-/04 PETITIONER Smt. Devki Devi W/o Katti Mistiy Caste- Carpenter (Badae),Aged- About 67 Years, R/o- Village- Banki Mogra, Tahsil Katghora, District- Korba [C.G.]. VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary Revenue departraent DKS Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Board ofRevenue of Chhattisgarh Through- Chairman, Bilaspur (C.G.) . 3. Collector, Distt.- Korba (C.G.) 4.Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue) Katghora Distt.- Korba (C.G.) 5. Chandan Singh S/o late Godari Singh caste- Gond, R/o- Village - Sutarra, Tahsil- Katghora,Distt.- Korba [C.G.] 6. Smt. Kaushilya Bai W/o Late Jay Lal Caste- Kanwar, R/o-Village- Mohan pur, Tahsil-Katghora, Distt.- Korba [C.G.]. 7.Santogh Jaiswal S/o Pusau Ram, Aged- 40 Years, caste- Kalar, 8-Ram Pratap Jaiswal S/o- Pusau Ram, Aged-35 years, Caste- Kalar, 9.3antlal Jayswal S/o Pusau Ram, Aged-30 Years, Caste- Kalar, (From 7 to 9 are the R/o ViUage- Sutarra,Tahsil- Katghora, Distt.- Korba [C.G.l. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF ^HB CONSTITUTION QF INDIA The abbve named petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under: XI-HC-22 sTr^r^T f^iic»>3Tfi^T sft+iiGti <yf^a '-- u ^^^n^i^R, ^Til^4!^ R^it^y (^ ^nif^r xi^? ,:,!^.....P-y.c.-?-^(°^ WRcTr^bHicn fd^^ 3?n^i'^fi^T^rf^T 7CI/A 30.9,2004 ..f Shri SanjayPate!, counsei fo?| Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Deputy respondents •No<l to- 4. The -petitioner ha^ preferre| 227 of the Constitution of India correctnes^ of order'dated 5.8.2(1 Chhattisgarh; in 'Revision Case No,1 i.12.2002 passed by the CoHector in|! 2001/affirming the order dated ^ Officer, Katghora, in.Revenue Case| S.&*0. dlrected'the reversion of lail the'^on of Lafe Sodri Singh from ^ bearing Kha^ra No.9/3- area 0,10' No.l5,Tshsil: Katghora, &i3trict: " ..Reievant facts for the ©odriSlngh, whowas Gdmittedly a the petitioner in the year 1975. Jhi Pradesh Land Revenue Code (Amenc| proyisions of Sectjon 170-B of^the A^ 'the Code'), were'.inserted. Sub-se^ envisages that if any person who .above" Section is^in possession. of dispotal cbtqfa^t TOTP^f "^ fe^t <fa^i< ^3lpOT3T[^ the petitioner,. j i&overnment Advocate for the State/ this writ petition under .Article 226/ juestioning the iegality, propriety 'and |84; by the. Board'of. Revenue, l-23/2003-04, (Effirming order dated l^ppea! Revenue Ccse No.S/A-23/2000- 16.3.2001 by the Sub Divi^ional No.83/A-23/1999-2000, whereby the |d in favour.of respondent'No<5 who is ^hom the.petitioner purcha^ed the c^re'.of ViJIage:. Sutarra,. Patwari Ha!ka Kclrba. • ./ . ^ ' -- - •• - of thi^ writ petltion are that Late ^ibe, soid.his' above agrlcultural to |;reafter, in the y^ar 1980, vide Madhya |ment) Act, 1980 !(for short 'the Act'), l.P.-Land Revenue'Code, 1959 (for short |;tlon (1) of Sectlon 170-8 of the Code tn the date of.commencement of the Isgriculturai iandiwhich beionged to a + ^"^ XI-HC-22 -S^T-^Pn^R.'^te^^ttt*^ 3i^r xpra? UtNxrtt ^ty^"—"""•"•""*•—-—g^ 2981 •"•""•""-""""•"•""""^^'"•""—"' (^ 3^r^r ^icb^i^ $i»*i!ict»^fl^a; €{ >^ ^T^'^TIi^R^i^ commenclement member of a tribe which. has been delc sub-sectlon (6) ofj Sectlon 165; commencement, notify to the Sub qj ^uch manner as may be prescrlbed, in possession of such land. Adir|3 given ,^uch information after provislons of Section I70-B'of.the£o{ re^pondent No.5, who is rhe .son ...of L| the S.&*0. about the trGn^fer of iand initiated and vide order dated 26.3 J reverting the bnd.to respondent preferred an appeal. before-the Coilej which the petjtionerpreferred a revl^ was dismi^ed. Now/the. under Article 226/227 of the F..have heard learned counsei f< Learned counsel for the petitio{ petitjoner con^t.ructed a Kachha hou^ year 1999 after demollshing the same benefit has been given to the petitior sub-section (3) of Section 170-B of th| But, I do not fi.nd any counse! 'for the petltioner for the r^ Constittition ^ubstajice chli^fel^iiH- ''TO^f^ '^^^R^ \ '^^if^pT^Fn^r :'iared to.be an aboriginai tribe under shai-i, within tviie years of such ivisiona! Offlcer in suc'h-form and.in ili the InformGtJon as to how he has ittedly, the petitioner herein had not of the Act and in^ert.ion of the le to the concerned S.&<'0< However, rte'6odri Singh, made a compiajnt to !,;on that compiajnt proceedings were |001 the S.D.O, pG^sed an order for |No.5 against which the pe+itioner :tor,.tne wa^ dismissed against jon before the Revenue Boar.d Qnd'the |etitioner has approached this'Court oflndia. ' • -"': ' the parti.es, ; . . argued that in the year 1975, the |e on the land and thereGfter/in the [he constructed a:Pakka house, but no i^r herein as provided in ciause (b) of ib Code. ^ce in the argument of the-.iearned tason that in the first instance, the ioier + XI-HC-22 3TT^?T'^T 'f^ri^^n^r $h*iicf» ^f^a ^l Somo/Padma ^. ^ ^' ^ '^^ '^n^^^^^^ R«yt«^<l< 3ff^?r xraq? ^W^ll 5hN|ch •M 200 •l^sr' ^n^r ^<n^i< ^i^a ^rft^ -3 beneflt of ciause (b) ofsub-sectio^ given to the petitioner oniy when Sectlon 170-B,.of the Code was'gi^ done'by'the petitioner* Prbceedln^s Section 170-B- ofv~ the Code oni therefore, the above provi^ions ar| to sub-section (3) .of.Sectlon -170"|B .structure has been erected aftbr provi^ion^ of ciause (b) above sh|sl argument of the. iearned counsei fc^r was constructed by the petitione ground also the/petitioner is not ^r ^ub-section (3) of Section 170-B o1 For +he af.oresaid reasonsj petition. Further, I do not find ar\ the iirrpugned orders, Uitimately/ Is ai^mis^ed,. ConsequentSy, M.(W.)P.No.2! di^posed of, ... chl^d4lr1 ^M<viT 4 f^t <F3i^ci< ^3Tf^m3TT^T (3) of Section 170-8 of the Code can be -he information under sub-section (1) of |?en,by the^petitioner; the ^ame was not js were initiated under sub-section (2) of the appiication'of respondent No.5; not'attracted, ;Even otherwise, provisb •^B.envisages that "where the buiiding or ^r the 1st dcEy of^ January, 1984 the li not dpply", Admittediy/as per the ^r the petitioner/Pakka house in question in the year 1999. Therefore, on this ^ntitied far the benefit of clause {b} of the''Code. • I do not find any-substance in-thi^ |y iiiegaiity, Infirmity or incorrectness in here i^ no force In this petition hence, It 136/2004 and I.A.No.623072004.stGnd Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge .[Tfti? tf^