[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.441 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1023 OF 1999 Mumbai Grahak Panchayat ..Petitioner Vs. The Director General of Police Fort, Mumbai & Anrs. ..Respondents .... U.P.Warunjikar i/b Sandeep Waghmare for Petitioner D.A.Nalawade AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 K.G.Munshi with Kamal Damle i/b Udwadia Udeshi for Respondent No.3 Kunal Dalal i/b Sailesh Dalal & Co. for Respondent Nos.12, 13 and 29 Vishal Patil for Respondent No.4 .... CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : MARCH 24, 2009 DATE : MARCH 24, 2009 DATE : MARCH 24, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This Notice of Motion has been taken out for condonation of delay caused in preferring this Notice of Motion as well as for restoration of the Writ Petition No.1023 of 1999. 2. All the Respondents have been served. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the [-2-] learned counsel appearing for the Respondents. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents state that they have no objection to the delay being condoned and Notice of Motion being made absolute. 3. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of Motion and in view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the Respondents, this Notice of Motion is allowed. Delay is condoned. Writ Petition No.1023 of 1999 be restored to file. Petition be listed for hearing in due course. 4. Motion is disposed of. [J.N.PATEL, J.] [J.N.PATEL, J.] [J.N.PATEL, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]