IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5338 of 2010 TULSI MAHTO, S/o. Dindayal Mahto, Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 22.07.2010 This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was on bail before the trial-court but he absented there due to his having been remanded in other case. It appears that the petitioner absented for two years during which period he is said to have been released on bail in other case. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner surrendered on 10.10.2009 and since then he is in custody in this case. It is submitted that the petitioner has remained in custody for nine months and thus he has been sufficiently penalized for his fault of absenting before trial-court. Learned counsel says that he undertakes on behalf of the petitioner that in future the petitioner will regularly be present in the court-below on the date fixed in the case. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Tulsi Mahto is admitted to bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. III, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Sessions Trial No. 826 of 2005 arising out of Raxaul Rail P.S. Case No. 17 of 2005. Mkr. (C.M. Prasad, J.)