Crl. Misc No. M 19397 OF 2011 ****** Shilpa vs State of Punjab Present : Mr. B.S.Sra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Gill, DAG Punjab for the respondent. ******* The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.07, dated 9.1.2011, registered under Sections 302, 120-B, 148, 149 of the IPC, at Police Station Kahnuwan, District Gurdaspur. On 10.8.2011, the following order was passed :- “ Learned AAG Punjab prays for a short adjournment to go through all the details collected by the Superintendent of Police (D) and inform the Court as to how the same intends to implicate the petitioner.” Counsel for the respondent, on instructions from ASI Jasbir Singh, has stated that at this stage it has not been able to conclusively link the petitioner through the call details. Counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner is admittedly running a beauty parlour and has no connection with the main accused or her husband and, therefore, there is no reason for her to have gone and duped the husband of the main accused to accompany her. In these circumstances, it is clear that at this stage the only evidence against the petitioner is that of disclosure statement made by the co-accused. In this situation, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner. Consequently, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 25.8.2011 or on any other date/s on which the Investigating Officer so requires, and in the event of her arrest, Crl.Misc No. M 19397 of 2011 : 2 : the petitioner shall be released on anticipatory bail by the Investigating Officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) August 17, 2011. JUDGE `kk'