IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10110 of 2009 MAHENDRA YADAV SON OF CHARITRA YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ROHINPAR,P.S.ISLAMPUR,DISTT.NALANDA Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc.No. 22320 of 2009 BHUNESHWAR YADAV SON OF LATE RAM SWAROOP YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHRO GORAIYA,P.S.ISLAMPUR,DISTT.NALANDA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 25.7.2009 Both the applications have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order because they have arisen out of one occurrence. The petitioners seek bail in a case which has been registered for offences under Sections 392 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant lady was way laid and on her fardbeyan, the present first information report has been registered. In course of investigation, the petitioners were apprehended and they were identified by the victim. Submission is that the identification is after one month and twenty days of the occurrence. The petitioners were shown to the informant at the police station and they have been falsely implicated. There appears no motive of false implication of the petitioners. Petitioner Mahendra Yadav has criminal antecedent. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, their prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioners may renew their prayer for bail before the court below if the informant does not support the prosecution case in trial. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)