IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5475 of 2009 1. SHAILE DEVI 2. Santosh Paswan 3. Keshar Paswan Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- Cr.Misc. No.5467 of 2009 RAJ MOHAN PASWAN @ RAJ MOHAR PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 22.5.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the state. The petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 5467/2009 is the husband. The petitioners in Cr. Misc. No. 5475 of 2009 are the family members. The common submission is for revival of matrimonial harmony. The husband is stated to have filed a suit for restitution of conjugal rights. Considering the generalized nature of allegations against the family members, let the petitioners above named in Cr. Misc. No. 5475 of 2009, surrender in the court below within four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M, Kaimur at Bhabua in Complaint case no. 955 of 2007 (Tr. No. 1580 of 2008). Let the petitioner above named in Cr. Misc. No. 5467 of 2009, surrender in the court below within four weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail for a period of six months furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two - 2 - sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabuar in Complaint case No. 955 of 2007( Tr. No. 1580 of 2008). If either during this period of six months or thereafter he appears physically and prays for regular bail any such application on his behalf is required to be considered in light of the subsequent developments that may take place between the parties, their respective attitude, as also the developments that may take place with regard to them in the restitution case stated to have been filed by the husband, without being prejudiced by the limited grant of anticipatory bail. (Navin Sinha,J.) A.Kumar