IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36774 of 2008 AMIT RANJAN @ GUDDU KUMAR, S/o Shri Murari Prasad Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 4/ 20.03.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that commitment of rape by two unknown persons followed by snatching of victim’s ornament is reported, but according to the learned counsel no cogent evidence could be collected by the I.O. involving the petitioner either it was hearsay statement or statement of spy and even then petitioner remained in custody since 7.04.2008. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J., F.T.C.-III, Buxar (Town) P.S. Case no. 68 of 2008. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)