HIGH COURT OF GHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI'HzL.vDATTU, C.J. w W.P.No.1 221 of 2002 PETITIONER AbdulWahab, S/o Late Abdul Gaifar, Agsd about 43 years. V ¢ Proprietor, New Raipur Roadwayéi F.C.l. Road. Tarbahar Bilaspur, Dislt. Bilaspur (CG) VERSU§ RESPONDENTS 1. Union of India, Through tho Secretary, Railway Department. New Delhi, The Deputy Chiof’ EleotricalEngineer (Comm) S;E. Raiiway. Biaspur (06) Present Shri P.K. Bhaduri, oounse' for the petitionar. Shri Bhishma Kinger, counoel for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 13’“ March, 2007) The petitioner is a transporter. According to him, he had done some work for the RaiMays. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the Railways have not discharged their liability towards the work done by the peliu‘oner. Therefore. he is before this Court for a direction to the respondenB to make payment to him forthwith and also to award compensation. (2) The respondents are the authoritieswithin the meaning of: Article 12 of the Constitution of lndia. To maintain a peWon‘ waist ‘them, the liability should have been admitted by them and after such admission, if there is any default in payment, than a writ/“W\ , f‘rr V l/H //, V V petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india would iie, before this Court. In the instant case, the petitioner has not produced any document alonq with the petition to show mat the respondents have admitted their liabiiity. In the absenoeeofrsuoh a document. it may not be proper for this Court to entertain this petition and direct the respondents to make payment to the petitioner. it (3) Therefore. t decline to entermin the petition. lt is for thee. petitioner to approach the appropriate forum for appropriate retief. Accordingly. this writ petition is dismissed. Ordered aocordingiy. R sw— A‘ V F ehlefJustrce . . ,2 /