(1) wp1828-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1828 OF 2011 Punam Shantaram Solanke PETITIONER VERSUS The S.T. Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nandurbar & others RESPONDENTS .... Mr. Vijay B. Patil, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.P. Phatke, advocate for respondent No.1. .... CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 30th MARCH, 2011 ORAL ORDER : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking directions to respondent No. 1/Scrutiny Committee to decide her tribe claim within time- frame. She has also prayed for direction to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to allow her to prosecute the M.B.B.S. Course to which she secured admission as a (2) wp1828-11 candidate belonging to Scheduled Tribe. Mr. Phatke, learned counsel for respondent No.1 - Committee, on instructions, submits that the petitioner's caste claim has already been decided and it is rejected by the Committee. The statement is accepted. In view of the said statement, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this writ petition and seeks liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate petition challenging the order passed by respondent No. 1 - Committee and for other consequential reliefs. The petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] NPJ/wp1828-11