IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 4432 of 2011 Date of decision: 25.7.2011 Raghbir Singh … Petitioner versus General Manager, Haryana Roadways. Jind … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Advocate, for the petitioner ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioner is the workman. He filed an application under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act,1947, before the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Panipat, after having engaged one Amit Bhardwaj as his representative. The application was dismissed on account of his non-appearance, vide order dated 24.7.2003. He filed an application for restoration of the same in November, 2008. The application for restoration has also been dismissed vide order dated 18.4.2011 passed by the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Panipat. Hence, this revision. Heard. There is an inordinate delay of 5½ years in seeking restoration without there being any explanation in that regard. His plea that he had also engaged Amit Bhardwaj as his representative has been found to be false and in fact, he was represented by one Karam Singh when the application was dismissed for non-prosecution. The present petitioner had been callous. There is no infirmity in the impugned order. No interference is called for. Revision petition is dismissed. July 25, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE