IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28438 of 2010 DHARMENDRA KUMAR @ DHARMENDRA THAKUR . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02/ 05.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under sections 304-B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the claim of the informant is that on 05.03.2009, he received secret information about the death of his daughter in her Sasural and when he went there he realized that she had died on 03.03.2009 and dead body was disposed of in a hurry without giving any information to the informant. It is also stated that the marriage was performed six years back and the deceased is alleged to have been killed because demand for “Palang” was not fulfilled although there was no occasion for killing of wife after six years of marriage merely for a “Palang”. It is also stated that in fact, the deceased had died due to snake bite when she had gone to attend call of nature in the morning and the body was not disposed in a hasty manner rather it was disposed of in due time in accordance with customs. He further submits that petitioner has remained in custody since November- 2009. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as 2 well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. Let petitioner, namely Dharmendar Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No.—31/09 dated 06.03.2009. Ranjan (S. N Hussain, J.)