WP 2048 & 1298 of 2010 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2048 OF 2010 (Sunil s/o. Raghunath Nathjogi & Anr. Vs. Sunil Sudhakar Fegde & Ors. ) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1298 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. P.N. Kutti, Advocate for petitioner in both petitions. Mr. Swapnil S. Patil, Advocate for respondent No. 1 in WP 2048/10 CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 7th March, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard finally. Shri. Kutti for directors points out that same challenge to impugned order by other directors has been allowed by this Court on 23rd December 2010 while passing orders in Writ Petition Nos. 2949 and 2950 of 2010. Advocate Shri. Patil for respondent No. 2 in Writ Petition no. 2048 of 2010 does not dispute this position. Nobody appears for other respondents in Writ Petition No. 1298 of 2010 though they are served. 2. In view of the statement made and for the reasons recorded in judgment of this Court dated 23.12.2010 in Writ Petition Nos. 2949 of 2010 and other connected matters, the present petitions are partly allowed. The respondent - WP 2048 & 1298 of 2010 2 Consumers are permitted to execute the judgments/awards of District Consumer Forum in their favour against the Society. In other words, they are restrained from taking any action against the persons or properties of the petitioners/directors. 3. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No costs. [ B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. ] ssc/wp2048/1298.10