1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3812 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL (St.) NO. 17831 OF 1993 Gauri Gundraya Kamath & Ors. . Applicants Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay. Respondents Mr.A.K.Sharma, Advocate, for the applicants. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 24th August, 2009. P.C. 1. The impugned judgment was passed on 29.6.1993. It appears that the appeal was filed almost immediately and it was circulated on 29.7.1994. However, it appears that the appeal was filed without certified copies of the judgment and decree. The appeal came to be rejected for non-removal of office objections as per the order dated 6.2.2004 passed by the Additional Registrar. Now this application is moved for restoration of the matter along with the certified copies. There has been delay of about 15 years in filing the certified copies and there has been delay of four years in making an application for restoration of the rejected appeal. The learned Counsel contends that the delays are caused by the earlier Advocate, Mr. Patwardhan, who was not keeping good 2 health. However, he offers to pay some costs to the Legal Aid Authority. 2. None for the respondent Municipal Corporation, though served. 3. Therefore, subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) to the State Legal Aid Authority within two weeks from this day, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned and the Appeal shall stand restored. If the costs is not deposited, the Application shall be deemed to have been rejected. Application stands disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)