1^"' ^ •^ ilni. '? l.ij'J&.: '\y IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR —Cqre^ i^- CONTEMPT PETlflON N0. IV] /2011 rITIONER V^" »,t ^^Murlidhar Dansena, aged about 55 years, S/o Shri Jaideo Prasad Dansena, Assistant Teacher, Govt. <L^ CONTEMNOR >c ^. t n' ^-"'^^B^'^^. Primary School Kiritmal, ?(®3^^—-^^^Tf Block Kharsiya, District '08^'^-A^/V " Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS Mr. H.R. Chouhan, Assistant Commissioner, Department of Tribal & Welfare District Raigarh (C.G.) TTEMP PETIION UNDER SBCTION 12 & 15 OF CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 'y^^ .HC-22 <^N 3:n^T'SFT k^ 3TT^T 9bHi<^ ^f^a ^f. Deepii ~^5c[ ^i^||d<LI. ^TTt^T^. fa<v11^1< Sn^T x^-^ [.^^O}AS. n^-i 11 •fN^T"""'""""7" ^TT^F'^TT^R ^rf^T SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra iViohfen Shrivastava, J 05=04-2011 Shri Ashwani Shukia, coun^ei for the Learned counsei for the peijitioner passed by this Court on 7/12/10 i(i date has not decided the represer|tation have elapsed. in the petition, there is no s^ecific of order was received by the res|3ondent. petitioner, after the order of the C<|>urt, to be submitted;in the office of| Therefore, it is not ciear as to received by the respondent. Under these circumstancesl, piaced before this Court, i am not this stage. The petition is accordir|gly dismissed The petitioner however, wfsuid petition, in case, the representatilsn 7/12/10. Certified copy as per ruies. <=hi^f<n<iflri Tn1R^rf'? f^^t iPsi^K ^ 37f^FT 3:n^T petitioner. submitted that thouah an order was Vv.P.(S) No.7119/10, the respondents tiil even though period of three months s^ecific averment as to on which date, copy E. The representation made by the t, addressed to the respondent is shown Biock Education Officer on 21/12/2010. oh which date the order of the Courfc was i on the basis of material which has been jnclined to issue notice to the respondent at iirlgly dismissed. be at liberty to revive the contempt is not decided as per the order dated Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [^5 tn^