1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6042 OF 2009 Shamrao s/o Yadaw Gaikwad ...Petitioner VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6045 OF 2009 Shankar s/o Keruji Salve ...Petitioner VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents ..... Shri B.R.Survase, advocate for the petitioners Shri R.P.Phatake, A.G.P. for respondent no.1 Shri S.D.Dhongade, advocate for respondent no.2 in both the petitions. ..... CORAM : S.B.DESHMUKH AND SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, JJ. DATED : 12 th October, 2010 2 PER COURT : 1 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 It is not in dispute that respondent no.2 in these two petitions is an employer/controlling authority and petitioners are employees working in the said institution. Both the petitioners have made representations to the respondents. On behalf of the respondents affidavit in replies are on record. 3 After hearing learned counsel for the parties, in our view, these two petitions can be disposed of with direction to the respondents to decide and dispose of the representations of the petitioners in accordance with the provisions of law and within three months from today. 4 Writ Petitions are accordingly partly allowed and disposed of with directions to decide the representations of the present petitioners within three months from today. No costs. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.) dbm/wp6042.09 3