IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8967 of 2011 VANTU MUKHIYA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 28.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the First Information Report but in course of investigation, it came to light that the stolen mobile was being used through the sim of the petitioner. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the sim of the petitioner had already been lost but on account of his illiteracy, he did not lodge F.I.R. in respect of his missing sim. Taking into consideration the above stated facts as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Naugachhiya Rail P.S. Case No. 19 of 2010. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)