Crl. Misc. No.M-16690 of 2010 (O&M) Deepak Goel and another Versus State of Haryana. Present: Mr. Arvind Kashyap, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S.Goripuria, D.A.G., Haryana. ******* This is a petition for anticipatory bail in FIR No.71 dated 12.05.2010, under Sections 323,506,34, IPC, registered at Police Station Kalka, District Panchkula. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that no allegations have been levelled against the petitioners in the FIR. Learned Deputy Advocate General, on instructions from the Investigating Officer, has stated that subsequently statement of the injured under Section 161 Cr.P.C. was recorded whereby the petitioner Deepak was also implicated having caused one blunt injury on the head of the injured. It is, however, considered that the said injury was simple injury. As regard, the second petitioner namely Gagandeep, the allegations against him having caused injury with Kulhari but no sharp edged weapon injury was found on the person of the injured. Learned Deputy Advocate General is not in a position to deny these facts. In view of these facts, in my opinion, it would be in the interest of justice, if the petitioners are granted concession of anticipatory bail. In the circumstances, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest subject to the provisions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. June 7, 2010 (AJAY TEWARI) Gagan JUDGE