IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.241 of 2008 RAJENDAR YADAV ….. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND 2. SUJAN DEVI …. Opposite parties. ----------- 2. 27.11.2008. N.H./ Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned order dated 8.1.2008, which has been passed under section 125 Cr.P.C. thereby the petitioner has been directed to pay maintenance of Rs.1,000/- per month to the opposite party no.2, who is a legally wedded wife. On perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the court below has properly appreciated the evidence of both parties and material available on the record. He has also awarded the maintenance to the opposite party no.2 according to the income of the petitioner. I find no material to interfere in the impugned order. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )