c. /? / ^r^r-7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRiT PETITION (S) HO.^^OF 20Q9 PETITIONER R. A. Pathak aged about 46 years, S/o. Shri Raj Mani Pathak R/o. Forest colony, five building, Jail road, District Durg, (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS ..^ 'f. RESPONDENTS ...-^ ^Ay^) .^.y^x^" ^ ^ ^%^ ^^•' .>' cy .^^ ^ ^ / w State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Principal Secretary, Forest Department, Government of Chhattisgarh, D.K. S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh The Joint Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Forest Department, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh The Principal Conservator of Forest, Aranya Bhawan, Medical College road Raipur, Chhattisgarh Chief Conservator of Forest (Land Management), Aranya Bhawan, Medical College road Raipur, Chhattisgarh Under Secretary, Union public Service Commission, Dhoulpur house, Shahjahan road, New Delhi WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF FNDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AWRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS. ORDERPRPRDERS.DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS OR THELIKE T^^m^ ^t HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETmONER WRIT PETITION (S) N0.6995 OF 2009 R.A. Pathak RESPONDiNTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ petition under Artide 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Anil Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. Gowri ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 15' day of December, 2009) 1. With the consent of leamed counsel appearing for the partires, the petition is heard finally. 2. Eariier the petitioner has filed a writ petition being W.P. (S) No.1289 of 2009 (R.A. Pathak v. State ofChhaWsgarh & Others) praying that the departmental enquiry pending against the petitioner has not been completed within a reasonable time. 3. The said writ petition was disposed of by this Court by order dated 4-3-2009 on the basis of statement made by learned counsel appearing for the State that the enquiry woutd be completed wjthin a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order dated 4-3-2009. The statement made by the tearned counsel for the State becomes part of the order unless and until it is modified or set aside by the superior Court. Thus, a substantive petition is not maintainable for the same reiief. 4. In view of foregoing, the writ petition is dismissed, as not maintainable. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take appropriate steps before the appropriate forum, if so advised. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge