IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21229 of 2009 BIGGU DOM Versus STATE OF BHAR ----------- 2 03.07.2009 Heard both sides. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under sections 457 and 380 of Indian Penal Code. The occurrence relates to commission of theft in the house. Petitioner is named in the F.I.R.. learned counsel for the petitioner refers to and relies upon the averments made in paragraph 13 of the present bail application which reads thus: “13. That, the falsity of the present case is more evident from the fact that the alleged First Information Report was instituted in the year 2005 but the investigation has started from 26.7.08 and on that day i.e. 26.07.08 at 4.20 PM the police has inspected the place of occurrence and recorded the further statement of informant Karu Prasad and thereafter allegedly recorded the statement of Leela Kumari.” It is contended that he is in custody since 24.3.2009. Referring to averment made in paragraph 12, it is submitted that the petitioner does not have any criminal history. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner abovenamed be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Belaganj P.S. case no. 55 of 2005. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )