IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33369 of 2008 MANI MISHRA @ MANI KANT MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 11.11.2008 Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey NO. 5 Learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. Surendra, A.P.P. for the State. The case is under section 307 of I.P.C. and section 27 of Arms Act. The allegation against the petitioner is that he fired a shot on the son of the informant. The injury report has been copied in the case diary and the injured was found bearing an injury on his chest which was found simple in nature. The contention is that there is dispute between the parties and that he has remained in custody for last 9 months. The above submission could have been relevant for consideration by this Court if the name of the petitioner would not have come again in two more cases. The application is dismissed for the present. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after examination of injured in the Trial Court, which must make meaningful efforts towards examination of the injured. pkj (Dharnidhar Jha,J)