HI©BCOTOtT OP JIBMCATURB OtBAmSCiARH: BnASPOR Sii^e Bench: Hoa'blc ffla'I Satish K. Agnlliotri, J. Petitioner W. P. (81 Mo. 1S12 «rf2007 Ram. shaian jain, aon of Shri Ganga Ram Jai ayBd about 37 ycars, woridag as Assfata Teacher, Govemment High School, Sacac Rcsidcnt of viUagp and Post Dhaaa.eaara, < Sarona, Kankei (C.U.). Versus Respoiuleats 1. 2. 3. 4. State of CIihatt^sarh, Uuou^jh. the Secrelai Department ofTribal Welfaae, Dau Kafyass. Siuj Bhawan, Kaipur(C.U.). The Assistant CoiBmissiDnfir, Tribal WeMa Departmeat, Distt. Kanker (C.G.). I'riacipal, Uovcmaicat Hi^icr Sccondary Scfaot SaraBa, KaaLfeer (C.G.). Rajendra Bishte, son of Bhola Datta Bishta, agt about 47 years, resident of village and po Saraaa, P.S. Dadlioaa, Distfc Kanker (C.O.) ^- Shri Rah.ulJha, Advocate for the petitioaer. Miss Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for tius respondents No. 1 to 3. ORDER (Pasaed oa this 15th day of Blarch, 2007) 1. By thM petitiou, Uie petitioner baa chaltenged the inqtugned suspeasioa oider dated 12.2.2007 (Aiinexure P/1). Thc petitioner was working as Assistant Teacher in Govenuaent High School, Saraaa, District - Kaiiker, when. the impayaed suspension oider was passed. 2. On perusal of ffae suspension oider, it sypears tfaat tlie petitioner atoug with. two otfaer Assistaut Teachera has been put under suspensfon on account of aUegcd iiTegularitfes aiid misconduct coiumitted by hica while working as Assfatemt Teacher. T ^- Thakur 3. Under Rule 9 of the Chhattisgarh Civil Servfccs (Classification, Control and Appea^ Rutes, 1966 (for stoort thc Rutes, 1966') any employee can be suspended where Ihe disciptinaxy proceeding agaiast hiia is conteinplated or is peadmg. Looking to thc chaxges stated in tfae auspension order it is ctear that a dtscqtlmaiy proceediag is contemplated against fh.e petitioiter. 4. The petitioiier, wifhout waiting for the cfaarge sheet, as requued ia sub-rule (2) ofRute 9 ofthe Rutes, 1966, steaightaway has come to tliis Court. The petition is premature and at ttus ata^e the samc caimot be eatertaiiied. 5. It is weD settied prmciple of law fhat fhe suspension is tempoxaiy and it does not involye punishment witti cwfl consequences. Suspension means a temporaiy deprivatun of tiie fiuictfons not amoiinting to auy reditctjon of his taak or his status. Thc emptoyee under suspeiision continues to be a Govermnent Servaat, he is not permitted to work teeepmg m view pendcncy of departmental enquuy to avoid iiadue influence in the proceedmgs ofdepartmental enqiury and Kfeefy tamperiag wifh on recbrds. 6. The petition is accordm^y dMmissed aununanly. No order aa to costs. ; ::"^ntt