€IIRI.E8ENS ]Siil2y'a-fc- >*»•'- ^ C^f W TO? HI6H COURT OF WHATTIS6ARH BILASPUft WRTT PEnnoN (s) NO. Cy 2009 PETmONER ; RESPON&ENTS : .f y^^y &.••• ^N<^y ^ Sitdram Yaday, S/0 Late Shri Ratiram Yadav, aged about 55 years, Occupation- Service, R/0 Bajirao Mahrapara, TahsH and District Raigarh, (C.G.) VStSUS (1) Stote of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Health and Farnily Welfare &epartment,E).K.S. Bhawan. AAantralay, Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.6.) ><" >-,•• -wy^\ -\l'-y\ ,^ -^ _:^-xy^, / Yi^ •Kj^je / .^ ;-\..^nv^ /^r <?'/' (Z) Oirector. Health Oepartment. Raipur, Oistrict- Raipur, (C.6.) (3) Chief Medicat Off\c.er. Raigarh. CXstrict Raigarh, (C.6.) (4) Collector, Raigarh, District- Rai"9arh, (C.6.) / (5) S.K. Padigrahi, Dresser Primary Health Centre, Nawapara, Block- Ghwghoda. District- Raigarh, (C.6.) (6) Rampal Nayak, Oresser, Primary Health Centre, Hati. C.H.C. Btock Dharamjaigarh, bistrict- Raigarh. (C.6.) WRIT PEmTON U/A 226 OF THE CONSrraTLmON OF INDI/t ^\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON fS) No. 5177 of2009 PETmONER RESPONDENTS Sitaram Yadav. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WMT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF ENDIA SB: Hon'Ue Shri Sattsh K. Aemhotri, J. Present: Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advoeate for the petitioner. Sbri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Govemment Advoeate forthe State/respondents 1 to 4. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 1 ltb day of September, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel aDoearing for the petitioner. on instructions, subniits fhat the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage and prays that tlie respondent authorities may be directed to consider and decide his representation dated 29 August, 2009 (Amiexure P/4) pendinj before the respondent No. 2, as eariy as possible. Shri Bhatia, leamed Deputy Goverament Advocate appearing for fhe State/respondents 1 to 4 submits that the representation ofthe petitioner, as aforestated, shall be considered and decided in accordance wilh law, on its 2. 3. Amit ovm merits, within a period oftwo weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa eopy offhis order. In view of the above, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication. Accordinsly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge