IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS MONDAY, THE 24TH JANUARY 2011 / 4TH MAGHA 1932 WP(Crl.).No. 511 of 2010() -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- C.ABDUL RAHIMAN, KOLAVAYALIL HOUSE, ETTAMMAL DIKKU, CHALYANAI ITTOMMEL, ANJUNOOR GRAMAM, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. GIRISH @ SHANAVAS, S/O.CHANDRAN SHEKAR NAIR @ MOHAMMED ISMAIL, MILMA QUARTERS, IQBAL ROAD, NOW RESIDING AT PUTHEN VEEDU, PAMMANKODE, PALLICHAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695008. 2. CHANDRAN SEKHAR NAIR @ MOHAMMED ISMAIL, RESIDING DO. DO. 3. GIRIJA, PULIMOODU PUTHEN VEEDU, PALLAMCODE, PALLICHAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695008. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HOSDURG-671324. 5. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KASARAGOD-671121. 6. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI KAMAPPU FOR R4-6 SRI.R.GOPAN FOR R1-3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(Crl.).No. 511 of 2010() APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE K.M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(Crl).No. 511 of 2010 S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 24th day of January, 2011 JUDGMENT Joseph, J. This Writ Petition was filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of Habeas Corpus for the production of the person of Jahitha, aged 40 years, who is the wife of the petitioner. The allegation of detention is made against respondents 1 to 3. The first respondent is the son of respondents 2 and 3. 2. Today we interacted with the alleged detenue. We also received a report from the J.F..M. -I, Hosdurg, before whom the alleged detenue had been produced earlier. On interaction with the detenue we find that it is her case that there is no detention by respondents 1 to 3. It is her case that she went on her own. According to the detenue, she does not want to go with the petitioner. W.P.(Crl).No. 511 of 2010 2 3. We also interacted with the petitioner and respondents 2 and 3. In view of the fact that the alleged detenue, who is a major, submits that she went on her own, we find that there is no illegal detention and she is a free agent. 4. Accordingly we close this Writ Petition. (K.M. JOSEPH) Judge (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS) Judge tm