: 1 : IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.955 OF 2007 TAX APPEAL NO.955 OF 2007 TAX APPEAL NO.955 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income-tax, . Mumbai City - III, Mumbai ...Appellant V/s. Innova Tradecom P. Ltd., Mumbai ...Respondent Mr.V. Gupta, Advocate, for the Appellant. Mr.J.D. Mistri with Mr.R. Darak, Advocates, for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & A.V. A.V. A.V. NIRGUDE, JJ. NIRGUDE, JJ. NIRGUDE, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 10TH JULY, 2008. : 10TH JULY, 2008. : 10TH JULY, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant and the learned Counsel for the Respondent. 2. The learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the questions of law involved in the above Appeal are squarely covered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee in view of our judgment and order dated 11th June, 2007 in Income Tax Application No.11 of 1999 in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Lazor Syntex Ltd. 3. In view thereof, the Appeal stands dismissed. : 2 : [A.V. [A.V. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] [DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] NIRGUDE, J.] [DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] NIRGUDE, J.] [DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]