a ? -Tf^, '^^?®;^:'fp%l^^^^%f^^;^^^^^^^Ni "^iS^SWS'^SS-^'SS^:.^::^£':'^';&'^i.^:s '^^SS-^-SS- S:VSSy'';s^y'! &^..'?^S Rss ^•?L.C...,.Sfl.i%.i • 1^1 ^" ^'^B^PI. *Ct<il»i" C'y'i 'f-o IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.I W.ByNo...........^:7..t»...../2 PETITIONBR: -^ ^ ^r~> ^ <(%s -<<y .^s. ^:^- .^f '^ Trinath Choudhary S/o Shri Punchram Choudhary, Aged 34 year's Working as L.D.T. (Tribal Department) at Govt. Primaiy School, Bhagwanpara, R/o Kotba, Tehsil Pathalgaon Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS -,<"• RESPONDENTS ^c:. c?.?-' 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) f \ ,^ 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare '\ ^' Department, Pt.Ravishankar University campus, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Asst. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 236^ OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE^F APPROPRIATE WMT OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIQRARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDBR OF LIKE NTURE v B iiiiBE iRu< '3 HK3H COURT OF CHHAmSflARH AT BILASPUR fc SINOLE BENCH : HON'K^ MR. SATISH K. AONlHOTRI. J. Petitioners WRIT PETITION (S.t N0^62 OF 2007 Sundar Lat Patel and another versus Respondents : StaterfChhatBagarhandothers Petitioner WRIT PETmON (S.i N0.263 OF 2007 Puna Ram Sahu versus Respondents : StateGovtofChtatte{prtiandothers Petitioner WRIT PETmON(S.) N0.264 OF 2007 Ram KumarSalame versus Respondents : State Oovt of Ghhattisgm'h anctothers WRFT PETmONfS.l NO^SBOP 2087 PeUBoner : Hemant Kumar Satama Versus Rsspondenls : SteiteOovt.ofChhatllsgarhandothere PeUtioner wwr pErmoN <s.t Nojwe CN* anaff Budhnath Sai Palkra varsus Respondents : StateofChhatttsgartiandothen PetiUoner Rwpondents WRTT PETITION (S.l NOA67 OF 20OT MadanLalSahu versus State of CMiatthsgarti and othere PeUtioner wRrrpETmoN <s.i N0^89 OF ZMT PUamber Patal versus Resoondents : State of ChhatUsgarh and ottiere Petitioner WRITPETmON (S.1 NOJS70 OF 2007 Trinath Choudhary vereus i : • • Respondents : StateotChhattisaarhandothere X PeUtioner vereus Respondents : State of ChhatUsgarh aid othere WraTPETmON (8.1NQ.281 OF 2fl87 Snrt. DeepUAgrawal Present Mr. R.S.Patel, Mr. Ravl Maheshwari, Mr. Rahul Jha and Mr. Rajendra Tripathi, counsel forthe peUUoner(s). Mr. Sushit Dubey, Govsmment Advocate and Mr. Satlsh Gupta, DeputyGovemmant Advocate for the Stat^respondents. . OIWER (Passed on 19"' Day ofJanuary, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for ttte parUas joinBy submit that the facls and que^ion of law invotved In theprasent buteh of wrtt pettttons are squarely coversd by the declsion of this Cotirt in the case of Yaahwwit Kumar BhwrwSwsi vs. Munlclpal Coiporatton, Dwg and anofftw3. 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Wrtt PetiUon (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Oopesft Kurosr Vwma v». The State ®ovtof ©fhatt&wwft and snotf»e»)and other connected matten, decided by this Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 2&-1-'t995, Isaued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary EducaBon, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examlnatien, it was clarifled Uiat the nomenclature of the Basic Trainlng Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and rsnamad as Diploma in Educaion, l.e., DSd. •!.' • Accordlr^ly, the D.Ed. GertBicata hoWBra we ateo cavwed tqr th» decision in Writ PeUtton (S.) No.4130 of 2006 (Gopesh Kwmr Vwma vs. The Stefe Govt. of Chhattsgarh and anoftei) (Supre). ^. 1 For the aforementioned reasons, the wit jieUtions are disposed of in tonns of the declston of this Court in tha matter of Yashwwit Kumar Bhamdwaj (Supia), subject to verification of the fect as to whether the petitlonere have acquired B.Ed^B.T.I./D.Ed. Certlficates at ttieir own expanses as per the cireulars datad 24-12- 1998 and 1-3-1999 and furttier v^ether they havs been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Qopd r A copy ofthis order be ptaced on the racort of the connected wrtt peUUons. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 3EWWMPJR-C996