1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirty First day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.9710 of 2011 1.USHARANI 2.SREENIVASAGOPALAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 & 2 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT IN CR. NO. 12 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.THIRUPATHI Advocate For Respondent : MR. K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for offences under Sections 109, 417, 419, 420 and 467 IPC in Crime No.12 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police, the petitioners have come up with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of prosecution, the de-facto complainant is the sister of the petitioners. Yet another sister of the de-facto complainant was hospitalized. Oxygen was required to treat her. For purchasing oxygen, the de-facto complainant paid a sum of Rs.5,000/- to a private agency. But unfortunately,t he ailing sister passed away. Thereafter, ti is the allegation that the petitioners got the amount refunded from the private agency by forging the signature of the de-facto complainant. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would deny the above allegations. 4.I have considered the above submissions. 5.Having regard to the close relationship between the parties and the amount involved and the nature of denial made by the petitioners and all https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 other attendant circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners but with conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. sd/- 31/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, DINDIGUL 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. S.THIRUPATHI Advocate SR.No.37162 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9710 of 2011 Date :31/10/2011 TR :03.11.2011: 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/