^p l-s-0-) IN THE HOrTBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WJ'. (S) No. ^3$?^ pf 2010 PETITIONER Gopal Sahu, S/o. late Onkar Sahu, aged about 24 years, R/o. Ward No.40, Basantpur, Kodhikhana, Road, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) RESPONDENTS :1 ^- ^•••^.^s^ ^f •i^' ^x? •'r <»-y •&.' <t<- :2) Versus Chhattisgarh State Warehousing Corporation through the Managing Director, 22 Anand Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Central Warehousing Corporation of India through it Managing Director 4/1 Shree Institutional Area, August Kranti Marg, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110 016 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .S^f ;i3B"' LffilC—78 3(1^1 ^I^RW -flansn^igitiw WH^fr a»Ni<a» -s^ ^wvfsi, -^tftws, t^ray .M..e.si.^::.a^^ 3n^?i'<ra^i' (' p) TOiTwafpon^i qipiferi^ wwS •?feet Tfe?re ^sifrosn^i SBiHon'MelMBrlMaaladKatohanterIvastawa. J 11.8.aoio Mr. H.B. Agrawa^ Sr. A4vocate witii Miss Ptagra Singh, coun»I for fhc petitioner. Heaid on admission. Ag^rievcd by iaactton ot^ tfae part of respoadents ia taking final decision on petrtioaer's appU^ation for compassionate appoiutment, fhis petition has been filcd. From the documeate pl^ced oa record, partfcular.fy miautes of mecting dated 16.2.2004 (^ respondents have resolvcd compassionate appoiatment in Luaexure P-8), it is revealed &at to consider cases for graat of accordaace witti ttie guidelines ia that regard fiaaa.ed by fhe State ofC^ihattisgarh. Leamed counscl for tiic p^titioner subxnits tttat aflier fhe dcatti of petitioner's fafheron 7.3.2009, appUcatian for graat of coni.passwnate appomtment was prompfly mo^cd on 9.5,2009, wtuch iias aemaiaed pendiagwithont aay dccision. Proin the contnauajcationd relatiag to ysaa.t ofcompassions dated 30th JUD.C, 2009 (Annesnire P-4) aad 28dl Aprfl, 2010 (Anaexiu(s P-7), it is revealed that the matter fte appointment to the petitioner is stUl underconsideration aad fiaal d^ciston has not toeea taken.' .-•yi-:"-'...;; •"'...^, \3 ::- XI-HC—78 311^1 W fk-«SS '^5V 3?1^?T'^^N? 'EXgseext ^"T "i<l'4l<'l-ll, ^til'M'Ko, fs<<?iiyy,< •^200 3wt?i Tt5i^ ('^3^?) offthe niatterwlth a direction chN[(T1<fll TTW^f ^* ^^ ^ $1< ^ajfffqan^i'i In thfa view of tfae tnatt^r, I deem it expcdient to fiiialty dfeposc to rcspondcnts to take decision on petitioner's application f<x|~ - coinpassionate appofatment, as expeditiousfy as possiblc, wiqria an outer linrit of 6 nionths, as tfae appUGation has remained pen^tng for more than one year. With the atoresaul direcl^on, fhe pctitioa stands dl^iosed off. Sd/- : Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge t