IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-30715 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 3, 2009 Krishan Joshi and others. … Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND Present : Mr. Sanjiv Pandey, Advocate, for the petitioners. S.D. Anand, J. (Oral) Crl. Misc. No. 55529 of 2009 Allowed, as prayed for. Crl. Misc. No.M-30715 of 2009 Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners would be content if a direction is issued to respondent Nos. 2 and 3, to give notice under Section 160 Cr.P.C. to the petitioners in case they are required for the investigation of a case. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. B.B.S. Teji, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Crl. Misc. M-30715 of 2009 The petition shall stand disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 (Senior Superintendent of Police, Bathinda and S.H.O., Police Station Rampura, District Bathinda, respectively) to give notice under Section 160 Cr.P.C. of the petitioners if they are required for the investigation of a case. This order would be operative for a period of three months from today. A copy of the order be given to the learned State counsel under the signatures of Special Secretary. November 3, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2