IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU WRIT PETITION NO : 24929 of 2009 & 24970 of 2009 WRIT PETITION NO : 24929 of 2009 Between: Y. Krishna Murthy (HUF) ..... PETITIONER AND State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission: A.P., Eruvaka Building, Khairatabad, Hyderabad & Others. .....RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION NO : 24970 of 2009 Between: Y. Krishna Murthy (HUF) ..... PETITIONER AND State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission: A.P., Eruvaka Building, Khairatabad, Hyderabad & Others. .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU WRIT PETITION NO : 24929 of 2009 & 24970 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Gopal Reddy) Since the parties in both the writ petitions are common and the issue involved is one and the same, they are heard together and being disposed of by this common order. The only grievance of the petitioner in these writ petitions is that though he filed petitions being F.A.I.A.No.1836, 1838, 1837 & 1839 of 2009 in F.A.Nos.665, 667, 666 & 668 of 2009 respectively, before the Additional Bench, A.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad on 22.7.2009 to vacate the interim stay, dated 22.7.2009 granted by it in F.A.I.A.Nos.1391, 1394, 1392 and 1395 of 2009 in F.A.Nos.665, 667, 666 and 668 of 2009 respectively, the same have not yet been disposed of and in the process, the petitioner is deprived of receiving the money decree obtained by him. Further it is the contention of the petitioner that the appellants before the Commission, who filed the above appeals cannot have any interest in the dividend deposited and receivable by the petitioner and therefore, the very appeals ought not to have been entertained. The petitioner is always at liberty to put forward his grievance before the Chairman of the A.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad about the non-disposal of the vacate stay petitions filed by him and it is for the Chairman to consider the said representation/request of the petitioner for early disposal of the F.A.I.As. In view of the remedy available to the petitioner, it is not a fit case where this Court can interfere with the matter at this stage. We hope and trust that the Chairman of the A.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad will look into the grievance of the petitioner in non-disposing of the petitions filed by him and shall see that the said petitions would be disposed of at an early date preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above observations, the writ petitions are dismissed at the admission stage. No order as to costs. _________________ (A. GOPAL REDDY, J.) ____________________ (SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J.) NOVEMBER 18, 2009 TSR