smll9 Beocr IN THE HGIGH OURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR LO CONTEMPT CAS^NO\^ /2011 Rq^" COMPLAINANT Makhiyar^Bara^k son of Shri Motaka Ram PETITIONER Badaik aded 67 vears resident of villaQe Sonkiyari Tahsil Bagicha District Jashpur ^L^ ^ VERSUS 1 C.R-.Bhagat Block Education officer Manora Tahsil and District jashpur C.G. 2 Vivek Dale^a Assistant Commissioner Tribal Walefare Department Jashpur District Jashpur (C.G.) 3 Surender Jaiswal Collector Jashpur District Jashpur Chhattisgarh. APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 12 READ WITH SECTION 14 OF THE CONTEMPT ACT 1971. CONTEMNER Resdt no5 Respdt no4 HC-22 ^TT^T'^T 'f^N'1371^T 5h^ich <^[ia -x^ t> ^"^r ^i^id<4, ^Ti1^^<o, f®i<ni^^ 3nt9T xra^ A^l.;^MC2fsN^5IW1 ^ '^^T' ^H^T ^CT^R °^Tft?T SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shriv 26-04-2011 Shri R. V. Raj'wade, counsel for the Heard. Learned counsel for the petitior 29-10-2010 passed by this Court in Writ P and order of recovery against the petition directed the respondents to make payment The authorities were also directed to make from the date it became payable under payment. He submits that though withhel deposited in the account of the petitioner, h released till date. It is also submitted that inability to make payment of interest, Collector, buttill date, the interest has not Taking into consideration that th| tioner i.e. Rs.3,68,911/- has already \\ petitioner and that the petitioner has issuance of necessary direction in the m^ inclined to issue notice in this case, at presj payment of interest has been fixed by thi^ The petitioner may approach the responde| of this order for necessary action. In casej reasonable time, the petitioner would be at With the aforesaid observation, the f| cM<lt<n<fli tTFT^f ^ ft^ Tf^R^R i7 ^ri^R 3:IT^T astava,J. fcetitioner. lier submits that vide order dated :|etition(S) No.6141 of 2007, the action ^r was declared illegal and the Court |of all retiral dues without undue delay. |)ayment of interest @ 10% per annym Ivarious heads till the date of actual |d amount of Rs.3,68,911/- has been lut the amount of interest has not been ^he respondents have expressed their wher^after an application was made to the b^en paid. amount due and payable to the |een deposited in the account of the a^proached the respondent No.3 for ^tter of payment of interest, 1 am not ^nt, particularly, when no outer limitfor Court in its order dated 29-10-2010. |t No.S-the Collector along with a copy [amount of interest is not paid within a |iberty to revive this petition. |)etition is finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [Tft^'^ft^^ il»-"'i