IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5484 of 2007 VEENA KUMARI, wife of Nandlal Das, resident of village Shambhupur Koari, P.S. Bhagwanpur, District Vaishali at Hajipur ... Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Commissioner cum Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. District Education Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur 4. District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur 5. Block Education Officer cum Block Teacher’s service (Appointment) Secretary, Bhagwanpur Block, District Vaishali at Hajipur 6. Block Development Officer Bhagwanpur Block Vaishali at Hajipur 7. Panchayat Teacher Selection Committee through its Secretary, Panchayat Raj Shambhupur Koari, Block Bhagwanpur, District Vaishali at Hajipur 8. Shri Dhirendra Bramchari, Mukhiya, Panchayat Raj Shambhupur Koari, Block Bhagawanpur, District Vaishali at Hajipur 9. Archana Kumari, wife of Jai Prakash Gupta, resident of village Kanhauli, P.S. Mahua, District vaishali at Hajipur 10. Smt. Preeti Devi, D/o Brahm Prasad, resident of Turki, Post Ausai, District Vaishali at Hajipur ... Respondents ----------- 2. 27.10.2010 No one appears for the petitioner. Counsel for the State is present. In the opinion of this Court for redressal of the following relief prayed in this writ application: “Through this writ application the petitioner craves indulgence of the Hon’ble Court for issuance of appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/ directions for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to make appointment of the petitioner on 2 the post of Panchayat Teacher for Panchayat Raj, Shambhupur Koari with immediate effect in place of one Smt. Archana Kumari (respondent no.9) by giving effect to the selection letter dated 22.12.2006 (Annexure 8) after quashing the appointment of Archana Kumari issued vide Resolution No.2 dated 18.1.2007 by the Teacher Selection Committee of Panchayat Raj Shambhupur Koari (Annexure 5) and also Resolution No.4 dated 3.1.2007 passed by the Shambhupur Koari Panchayat Teacher Selection Committee (Annexure 6).” the remedy of the petitioner in the first instance would be before the District Teachers Appellate Authority. Admittedly the petitioner has not moved the said appellate authority. In that view of the matter, this application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move the said appellate authority which, if moved by the petitioner, would decide his case after giving opportunity of hearing to him as also to respondent no.9. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/ 3