IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 9240 of 2009. Date of Decision : June 12, 2009. Gurmej Singh. ...... Petitioner. Versus. State of Punjab and others. ..... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH. Present:- Mr. Bikramjit Singh Bajwa, Advocate, for the petitioner. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL). Counsel for the petitioner contends that the Block Development and Panchayat Officer vide Annexure-P-1 has stated that if the Sarpanch is not able to get the coram of the panchayat complete, an administrative process for appointment of the Administrator shall be initiated. Counsel for the petitioner contends that this order could not have been passed by the Block Development and Panchayat Officer. He submits that an appeal preferred by one of the Panches is likely to succeed and on that the petitioner-Sarpanch would have the required coram. He further submits that before decision of the appeal, the proceedings for appointment of the Administrator cannot be initiated. The contention of counsel for the petitioner is totally mis- conceived, the Administrator as such has not appointed and the petition is pre-matured. With above observations, the petition stands dismissed. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) JUDGE June 12, 2009. sjks.