IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 4057 of 2008. Decided on: 30th August, 2010. Ridku Ram. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : None. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. None for other respondents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): In sequel to order dated 26.07.2010, the petitioner has not been served, however, petitioner’s Advocate has been served. Neither the petitioner nor any counsel on behalf of the petitioner is present today. Consequently, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge August 30, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?