IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.302 of 2004 SHAHID AZAM RABBANI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THRU.VIG.&O With Cr.Misc.No.27171 of 2004 4 4.8.2008 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a Bench this Court vide order dated 13.2.2008 observed that the matter has arisen out of a complaint case and the complainant has compromised the case with the petitioner. The learned Judge also observed that a compromise petition has also been filed to that effect.This Court further granted two weeks’ time to file compromise petition which was duly filed. This Court again by order dated 4.3.2008 observed that as per the submission of the petitioner a withdrawal petition has also been filed before the learned Special Judge on 5.10.2004. Mr.Bibhuti Pandey, Senior Advocate, in both the cases submits that the learned trial court has issued notice to the complainant. Mr. Rakesh Kumar appears on behalf of the Vigilance In view of the subsequent development in this case this Court directs that the trial court would dispose of the case pending before him expeditiously in accordance with law also taking into consideration the compromise and withdrawal petition preferably within four months from today. It will be open to the petitioner to move this Court if he is aggrieved by his subsequent order. With the aforesaid observations both these applications stand disposed of. AnilKsinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.) - 2 -