IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2010 / 26TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 8907 of 2010(K) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. ELSY, W/O.LATE JOSE @ OUSEPH, MALIYEKKAL CHETTAKKA HOUSE, KONOOR DESOM, MURINGOOR THEKKUM MURI VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. 2. VIMAL, S/O.ELSY, DO. DO. DO. 3. VIPIN, S/O.ELSY, DO. DO. DO. 4. VINITHA, D/O.ELSY (MINOR) DO. DO., REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER AND GUARDIAN ELSY. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.BHARATHAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. 2. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACQUISITION), CORPORATION OF THRISSUR, THRISSUR CORPORATION OFFICE, THRISSUR. MS.K.R.DEEPA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.8907 of 2010 (K) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 17th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioners state that although 0.3455 hectors of land was acquired from them as per Ext.P1 award, they were paid compensation only in respect of 0.2469 hectors of land. In the said circumstances, they filed Exts.P2 & P3 representations before the 2nd respondent for payment of compensation in respect of the balance area. These representations have not been considered and with that grievance, this writ petition has been filed. If as stated, Exts.P2 & P3 representations have been received, the 2nd respondent shall consider the same and pass orders thereon. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg