^ : Hon'bie Shri Dlla'p Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. Smt. Durapatl Bai, W/o Chandra Prakash Sahu, 32 years, R/b !n front of schooi Pahadipara Sanongari, P.S, Amanaka, Raipur, Tahsii and District Rajpur (CG) vemus 3. Raj Kumar Vishwakarma, S/o Sewa Ram Vishwakarma, R/o, Vl!!age Kandel, P.S. Arjuni, Tah. Dhamatari, Distt. Dhamatari (C.G.) Ghanshyam Prasad Kashyap, S/o Mahendra Prasad Kashyap, R/o Viliage & Post Chhati, Tahsii Kurud, Distt. Dhamatari (C.G.) The Insurance Company Limited, Office, Dhamatari, By Djvjsionai. SVIanager, Divlsionai Office, Kachahari Chowk, Jai! Road, Raipur (C.G.) Memorandum of appea! under Section 173 ofthe Motor Vehides Act, 1994 Pr'ssent : Shrl S.C. Verma, counsel for the appeiJant. Shri S.P.Sahu, counsei for respondents No.1 & 2. Shri A.K. Athaley, counse! for the respondent No.S/insurance company. on 14In August, Heard. (2) Belng aggrieved by the Impugned award 29-04-2006 by the Fourteenth Additional Motor Claims Tribunai, F.T.C., Raipur lenceforth 'the M.A.C-.T.') in Clai.m Case No.45/2006,whereby a surn of (h Rs.49,000./- has compensatlon, the appellanVciaimant has preferred this appeai for enhancement of the compensatlon. (-3) During the course of arguments, a sett!ement was^amved. at whereunder the Insurance company to pay a sum of Rs.40,000/- in additlon to the compensation by the MA.CJ, by depositing the wlthln a oftwo months today. (4) . Shri S.C. Verma, counsei for the appejlant/daimant agrees to the settlement, (5) In view of the settiement arrived at, the award passed by the M.A.C.T. is modlfied and an additlonal sum of Rs.40,000/- over and the sum by the MA.CJ. is as coinpensation to the appellant/c!aimant. After adjustlng the compensation aiready paid, the No,3/lnsurance company a sum of Rs.40,000/- wlth the MA.CJ. wlthin a of two months from today, which, it aiso be to pay Interest at the rate of 8% per annum frorn the of ti!i (8) Wlth the direction, the misceiianeous of. A copy of this order be to the M.A.CJ^ forth'with. The MA<C.T. on deposit of compensation ensure: (A) that the clainianVappe!!ant 1s about the and to the IVIA.C.T., in with her book of an in a bank, (B) that the book of the claimant Is by the photograph and Is duiy by the bank and the same is verifled by the MA.CJ. issuance of cheque, (C) that a is to the concerned not to the amount In favour of any person, other. the clairnant uniess ordered bythe MA.CJ., Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge