IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.5859-M of 2010 Date of Decision:29.3.2011 Balbir Singh and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Rana, D.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.530 dated 22.11.2009 registered under Sections 435/506 IPC Police Station Sadar Karnal. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from ASI Joga Singh states that after investigation un-trace report has been prepared, which is pending approval. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the present petition is rendered infructuous at this stage and is disposed of as such. However, in case of any adverse development, the petitioner is at liberty to file afresh or avail the alternative remedy as appropriate. 29.3.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE