THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.24986 OF 2001 ORAL ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that W.P.No.21813 of 2001 and etc., filed with an identical prayer were disposed of by this Court by order dated 28.9.2006 holding as under: “In the light of the factual controversy and also in the light of the decisions referred to supra and further in the light of the language of Section 421 of the Act aforesaid, this Court is of the considered opinion that the impugned actions as such cannot be sustained and however, in the peculiar facts and circumstances the matters are remitted to the respondents in the respective Writ Petitions giving opportunity to the respective writ petitioners to make their representations and the respective respondents to consider the said representations or objections relating to the applicability or otherwise of Section 421 of the Act and decide the same in accordance with the decisions referred to surpa” The learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the fact that the petitioner herein also stands on the same footing. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 28.9.2006 in W.P.No.21813 and etc., No costs. ______________ (G. ROHINI, J.) 18th July, 2007. Kgr THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 24986 OF 2001 18th July, 2007. Between: M/s Vasavi Co-op Bank, RTC X Roads Branch, represented by its Managing Director – Mr. V. Rohin Kumar. .. Petitioner. And The Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Represented by its Commissioner, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad and another. .. Respondents.