THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5877 of 2009 ORDER: Heard both the counsel. The petitioner herein, who is the judgment debtor in O.S.No.33 of 2004, filed this Civil Revision Petition aggrieved by the judgment and decree, dated 26-10-2006 in O.S.No.33 of 2004, wherein the court below passed the decree directing the petitioner herein to pay the decretal amount of Rs.1,44,000/- along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from 09-07- 2004 to 26-10-2006 and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum from 27-10- 2006 till the date of realization. It is the case of the petitioner that he intends to file an appeal against the said judgment and decree of the court below, but he was advised that there are no good grounds for filing appeal. Therefore, he seeks to file an application under Order 20 Rule 11 (2) of CPC for grant of monthly instalments for payment of the said decretal amount. But, in filing such application, there was a delay of 5 days. Therefore, to condone the delay of 5 days, he filed I.A.No.443 of 2006 before the court below, but the court below dismissed the said application on the ground that no sufficient cause has been shown. I am of the opinion that the cause shown by the petitioner in explaining the delay of 5 days in filing an application, seeking instalments for payment of the decretal amount, cannot be said to be insufficient. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and I.A.No.443 of 2006 in O.S.No.33 of 2004 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Srikalahasti, stands allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 12-03-2010 Prv