1 caw3070-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa CIVIL APPLICATIOIN NO.3070 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4597 OF 1994 Kantilal Manilal Desai .. Applicant V/s. Rameshbhai Vithalbhai Vyas .. Respondent ..... Miss. Ranjana Parikh for the applicant. Mr. Rahul P. Walvekar for respondent. ..... CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : MARCH 15, 2011. P.C.:- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. In paragraph Nos. 6 and 7 of the application, the applicant has set out the reason why the applicant and his advocate could not remain present before this Court when the Writ Petition was called out for final hearing. In view of the said averments, an opportunity will have to be granted to the applicant to contest the Writ Petition by setting out the final order passed in the Writ Petition. As per the Administrative Order passed by the Hon'ble the Chief Justice on 7th March, 2011, on the basis of consent of both the 2 caw3070-10 parties, the Writ Petition will have to be heard by this Court. 2. Hence, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 3. The Writ Petition shall be placed for final hearing at the end of the admission board on 21st April, 2011. JUDGE