IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2008 / 14TH PHALGUNA 1929 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3082 of 2005() ------------------------------ CRA.635/2003 of ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, KOZHIKODE CC.1153/1999 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, KOYILANDY .................... REVN. PETITIONER: APPELLANT/ACCUSED SURENDRAN, S/O.KUNHICHEKKINI, THEKKEPUNATHIL HOUSE, KEEZHARIYOR AMSOM, NAMBRATHKARA DESOM. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHARAM.P RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. ADDL. RESPONDENT IMPLEADED 2. YASODHA, W/O. KUNHIRAMAN, NADICHAL MEETHAL, NADUVATHOOR, KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE. (ADDL. R2 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 04.03.2008 IN CRL.M.A. NO. 1350/2008) BY ADV. SRI.V.N.RAMESAN NAMBISAN SRI. PUZHAKKARA MUHAMMED, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CRL.R.P. NO. 3082/2005 : 2 : ORDER ON CRL. M.A. NO. 20990/2005 IN CRL.R.P. NO. 3082/2005 DISMISSED 04.04.2008 SD/- V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. V. RAMKUMAR , J. ========================== Crl.R.P. No. 3082 of 2005 ========================== Dated this the 4th day of March, 2008. ORDER The petitioner who has been concurrently convicted under Section 354 IPC challenges the conviction entered and sentence passed against him. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter and Crl.M.A No. 1592 of 2008 has been filed jointly by the petitioner as well as the de facto complainant seeking to record the composition entered into between the two. The composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner of the offence punishable under Section 354 IPC in view of Section 320(8) Cr.P.C. This Crl.R.P is disposed of accordingly. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv