IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-9213 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 28, 2011 Anju Bala …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Darshan Singh Bishnoi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that anticipatory bail granted to in-laws – respondents No. 2 and 3 vide order dated 22.02.2011 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sirsa, is outcome of non-application of mind, therefore, bail is liable to be cancelled. Order reveals that in-laws – respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have joined the investigation pursuant to the interim bail granted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. CRM M-9213 of 2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that respondents – accused have not misused the bail. There is no ground to cancel the bail. Dismissed. March 28, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2