BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Fifth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15440 of 2011 KUMAR ... PETITIONER/SINGLE ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALAYANOOR POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. CR NO. 84/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. K.GOVINDARAJAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner was arrested on 24.10.2011 by the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 324, 506 (ii) and 307 of IPC, seeks bail. 2. Heard Mr.K.Govindarajan, Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 24.10.2011. He would further submit in his argument that there is no necessity to keep the petitioner in judicial custody and due to election dispute, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offence. He would also submit in his argument that the petitioner has also got permanent residence and he is ready to abide by any condition and therefore, he may be considered for bail. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the incident took place on 23.10.2011 and the petitioner assaulted with knife on the thigh of the de-facto complainant and the injured has been discharged from the hospital. He would further submit in his argument that the investigation is almost completed and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, suitable conditions may be imposed. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Considering the submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 24.10.2011 and the investigation is said to have been almost completed and under these circumstances, this Court feels that the petitioner is entitled for bail with stringent conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manamadurai and on further condition that the petitioner shall stay at Palani and report before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palani daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. sd/- 25/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAMADURAI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI. 4. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PALANI. 5. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDUGAL. 6. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALAYANOOR POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 7. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. K.GOVINDARAJAN Advocate SR.No.41444 SR : 25.11.2011 : 2P/9C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15440 of 2011 Date :25/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/