IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.402/2002 Dhanna Lal S/o Gyarsiram & Others ...plaintiff-appellants Versus Ram Gopal S/o Shri Gordhan & Another ...defendant-respondents Date of Order ::: 08.11.2006 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Santosh Kumar Jain, Counsel for plaintiff- appellants Shri Rohan Jain, Counsel for defendant-respondents #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the parties. The plaintiff-appellants filed a suit for permanent injunction, which was dismissed by the lower court by observing that the plaintiff did not get his 'patta' exhibited in the case. The other evidence was also taken into consideration by the lower court. Being aggrieved with the same, an appeal was preferred by the plaintiff, which was barred by 45 days. The first appellate court, after considering the arguments of learned counsel for the plaintiff, dismissed the appeal being barred by limitation as well as on merits also. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties as well as the findings of both the courts below and I do not find any substantial question of law involved in the second appeal and consequently the same is dismissed at admission stage itself with no order as to costs. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//