1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 1990 OF 2009 Suresh R. Sheth ...Plaintiff. Vs. M/s. Pharma Base India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Defendants. Mr. Ajay Panicker i/by M/s. Ajay Law Associates for the Plaintiff. Mr. Gourang R. Mehta for the Defendants. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 11TH FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C.- 1 In a suit filed by the Plaintiff whereby, the claim is basically against Defendant No.1 towards the balance payment of running bills. The parties have arrived at the settlement and accordingly signed the consent terms dated 8th February, 2010. It is taken on record and marked "X". The consent terms is signed by the Plaintiff and Defendant No.1 and their respective advocates. The parties are present in the Court. There is no dispute/ objection about the signatures, identification and authorization. The Plaintiff is not claiming anything against Defendant No.2. The statement is made that the consent terms is well within the framework of law and the record. No third persons/ parties are involved and/or affected by this consent terms. 2 In view of this, the present suit is disposed of in view of this consent terms. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)