IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY WP.MP.No.7835 of 2010 in W.P.No.9237 of 2008 AND WRIT PETITION No.9237 OF 2008 Between: M/s.Vindhya Developers and Builders (P) Limited, represented by its Managing Director and two others. … Petitioners And The Special Court under A.P.Land Grabbing Prohibition Act and 11 others … Respondents This Court made the following: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY WP.MP.No.7835 and 7836 of 2010 in W.P.No.9237 of 2008 AND WRIT PETITION No.9237 OF 2008 ORDER: - (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy) WP.MP.No.7835 of 2010 is filed by the writ petitioners seeking to withdraw the writ petition against respondent Nos.6 to 8 and 10 to 12, which has not been opposed by the respondents. Accordingly, the WP.MP.No.7835 of 2010 is ordered permitting the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition against respondent Nos.6 to 8 and 10 to 12. Since the legal representatives of respondent No.9 are not brought on record, the writ petition stands dismissed as abated as against respondent No.9. WP.MP.No.7836 of 2010 is filed under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 to record compromise as per the memorandum of compromise entered by the writ petitioners and respondent Nos.2 to 5 in the writ petition, who initiated the proceedings in L.G.C.No.17 of 1997 and obtained declaration that they are the owners of the scheduled property and obtained directions for eviction of the writ petitioners therefrom. Today, the parties along with their respective advocates are present in the Court, affirming the terms of compromise filed along with the writ petition for recording the compromise and also admitted their signatures therein. Respondent Nos.2 to 4 along with their Advocate Sri S.S.Khadri, Junior of Sri Shareef Ahmad are present and Sri Shaik Mahaboob Vali filed appearance for respondent No.5, representing that respondent Nos.2 to 5, who are the applicants in L.G.C.No.17 of 1997 have no objection for allowing the present writ petition by setting aside the judgment and decree dated 03.04.2008, in L.G.C.No.17 of 1997 as the disputes between the writ petitioners and respondent Nos.2 to 5 were settled and recorded in terms of the compromise in A.S.No.31 of 2009 on the file of Principal District Judge, Ranga Reddy District. In view of the same, WP.MP.No.7836 of 2010 is ordered and the writ petition is allowed in terms of the compromise setting aside the judgment and decree passed in L.G.C.No.17 of 1997. Accordingly, the writ petition in so far as respondent Nos.2 to 5 is concerned, is allowed in terms of the compromise; dismissed against respondent Nos.6 to 8 and 10 to 12 as withdrawn and dismissed as abated as against respondent No.9. No costs. __________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J ____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 30.03.2010 Note: Office to append a copy of memorandum of compromise along with the order. {B/o} lmv