,:^ ^ '"^^ ^ ^SfiS& 1 ^•^^/. . "" ^•^I-HC—78 ^n^ff ^r Rl^iob TOT 3tTT^[ 9r)*iw ^ '7^ ^ww^, ^-^ww, tsi<ni-y*j,< HMCTI «»*11<t» -^20Q ^n^r'q^RF (<iq^lq<itsr) ItcfWt 1Rf^T ^ii^i ct)ic<I<n€ill^HiH<yff '^'fest Tfw?TC '2fr3TfiW3fl^T Sinale Bench; Hon'Me Mr. Justice bhirendra Mishray W.P. fs) No.766/2009 (Petition U/A 226 of|t-he Constitution of India) Petitioner Vijayj Thaw) TeacO Kumar Thawait, S/o Late Shri Amrit Lal iit, aged about 30 yearg, Assistant ler, posted at Shashkiya Aarakshi Vs RESPONbENTS Kendi|a Prathmik Shala, Champa, District Janjg|ir-Chamapa (C.6.). 1. £to|te of Chhattisgarh, Through, The Se<|retary bepartment of Education, b.K.S. Bhc|wan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Th^ bistrict Education Officer, Janjgir- Chcfrnpa, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 06.2.2009 I Mr. F.S. Khare, Advoca|t-e for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Dy.4ovt. Advocate for the State. Heard. The petitioner,_who w<|is initially appointed on the post of Assistant Teacher in the |School Education Department of the State Government, is (|iggrieved by the action of the respondents in not add'mg |two advance increments in his salary even though he did expenses before joiningont ^isb.Ed. Examination at his own ^e post of Assistant Teacher. '—78 3?n^y'5RT R;^Gh TO[ 3R^?T gr)*iioh ^ 'TSET '<ii<ii<n^, ^TilwKo, i®i<yii-H^< <11*<CTI CT»*1|C») <W^200 W^TTT3^> (T3pf35^) ^KiiqR ^fca 3n^?[ Learned counsel for petitioner's case is squarely | in W.P. (s) Nb.591/2009 others Versus The State of this Court and this petition direction given by this Court in The above fact has not for the State. •Khe petitioner submits that the |covered by the decision of this bep'ween Preetam Singh Parihar and Cl^hattisgarh and another decided by be disposed of in terms of the ^he aforesaid matter. mtly In view of above, the in^t a direction to the responden1|s increments to the petitioner within a period two months fro|n be subject to all verifications pleaded in the petition. No order as to costs. <iM€<f<!l<i1l *11*-«nT^* [G<<1 <Fai^l< ir^TRm^T^r been disputed by learned counsel ^tant petition is disposed of with to make payment of two advance ^rom the date of his appointment today. However, this order shall |nade by the State regarding facts Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge