IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.DENESAN TUESDAY, THE 19TH DECEMBER 2006 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 WP(C).No. 33783 of 2006(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ HAMSA C.V., CHERIYAVATTANGOTTU HOUSE, P.O.VAVAD, KODUVALLY, KOZHIKODE, WORKING AS PARTTIME SWEEPER, OAMASSERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH, KOZHIKODE. 4. OMASSERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, OMASSERY, KOZHIKODE. R1 TO 3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SHRI. BIJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.K.DENESAN, J. ----------------------------- WP(C)No. 33783 OF 2006 ----------------------------- Dated this the 19th December, 2006. JUDGMENT The petitioner is working as Part Time Sweeper, a contingency post in Omassery Grama Panchayat. He has filed Exts.P8 and P9 representations before the third respondent requesting to consider him for promotion to the post of Lower Division Clerk in terms of Ext.P5 G.O. The third respondent has not passed any order on Exts.P8 and P9 and having not received any response to his representations, the petitioner has approached this Court. 2. I have heard counsel for the petitioner and Govt. Pleader for the respondents. In the nature of the order I propose to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to the fourth respondent. 3. The writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent to consider Exts.P8 and p9 and pass orders in accordance with law, within one month on the petitioner producing a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. If Exts.P8 and P9 are disposed of in favour of the petitioner, consequential benefits shall be granted to him immediately. K.K.DENESAN Judge jj