IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.950 of 2009 Between: Goka Laxma Reddy ..... Petitioner AND National Highways Authority of India, New Delhi & others. .....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Ms. B. Saipriya for Sri S. Surender Reddy Counsel for respondents 1&2: M/s. M.V. Kini & Co. Counsel for respondents 3-5: GP for Land Acquisition The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.950 of 2009 ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in proposing to construct Toll Plaza and related structures in the lands of the petitioner in Sy.No.35, situated at Pipparwada Village, Jainath Mandal, Adilabad District without following any procedure even though alternate lands are available as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, violation of principles of natural justice, null and void and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to proceed with the proposed construction of Toll Plaza and related structures in the lands of the petitioner in Sy.No.35, situated at Pipparwada Village, Jainath Mandal, Adilabad District in the interest of justice.” At the hearing, Ms. B. Sai Priya representing Sri S. Surender Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that after filing the Writ Petition, the land in question was acquired and compensation was paid to the petitioner and therefore the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition as infructuous, WPMP No.1212 of 2009 and WVMP.Nos.4046 and 4200 of 2009 are also dismissed as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 11.04.2011 ES