IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.53117 of 2008 1. DILIP KUMAR MISHRA son of Bimal Kumar Mishra, 2. Pradeep Kumar Mihsra son of Bimal Kumar Mihsra, 3. Sushil Kumar Mishra son of Late Rajbanshi Mishra 4. Bipul Mishra son of Sushil Kumar Mishra @ Aman Kumar Mishra. 5. Amar Mishra @ Amar Kumar Mishra son of Satish Kumar Mishra 6. Praful Kumar Mishra son of Arun Kumar Mishra 7. Bamdal @ Surendra Kumar Jha son of late Nageshwar Jha @ Rajeshwar Jha. All of village Sourath, Police Station Rahika, District Madhubani. All of village Sourath, Police Station Rahika District Madhubani. … Petitioners. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Jyotsana Jha w/o Arbind Kumar Jha presently residing at village- Haripur, Bakitol P. S. Kaluahri, Dist. Madhunai. 3. Arbind Kumar Jha son of Late Surya Kant Jha posted at D.M.S. 3 South Eastern Central Railway, Bilashpur (Chattisgarh), Pin 495004. … Opposite parties. ----------- 4. 26.08.2009. Heard counsel for the parties. Pursuant to the previous order of this Court dated 18.4.2009 opposite party nos. 2 and 3 are personally present. At the outset, counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have now no concern with opposite party no. 2 and 3 and they do not intend to have any contact with them, specially when they have been subjected to humiliation at the hands of opposite party nos. 2 and 3 on the basis of first information report in 2 question. Considering the nature of allegations, the stage in which it was brought and the manner in which the lady, opposite party no. 2 still would like to contest the case, it appears that the same is out and out some family dispute between two brothers in one hand and sister, informant on the other hand. The rest of the petitioners in fact have been only brought into the scene because they are related to petitioners no. 1 and 2 being the brother of opposite party no. 2. Be that as it may, as this court has already granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners provisionally by earlier order dated 18.4.2009 and there is no allegation of misuse of such privilege, this Court would confirm the grant of such provisional anticipatory bail to the petitioner. This application is allowed to the extent indicated above. It is made clear that if the court below is furnished with cogent evidence that the petitioners are either visiting the house 3 of opposite party nos. 2 and 3 at Bilashpur where they are residing or in any way causing any threat or coercion to them, the court below will be at liberty to pass an order for canceling bail of the petitioners. At the same time, counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 has also assured this Court that in view of the ugly experience in the hands of the petitioners they would also not like to have any relationship and they would also never visit the house of the petitioners. Thus in case, the aforementioned conditions is violated by opposite party nos. 2 and 3 not only an information to that extent will be given to the court below but also the police will be informed with regard to aforementioned action on the part of opposite party nos. 2 and 3. With the aforesaid observation and/or direction this bail petition is disposed of. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)