IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12939 of 2011 Prithvi Chand Mandal Son of Late Basudeo Mandal, Resident of Village and Post Office Madhuvan, Police Station Uda Kishunganj, District Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Education Officer, Madhepura. 4. The Block Education Extention Officer, Behariganj, District Madhepura. 5. Headmaster, Upgraded Middle School, Hathindha, Madhepura. 6. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2. 9.8.2011. Heard Shri Uday Chand Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Equbal Neyazi, learned A.C. to G.P.4, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 5 and Smt. Namrata Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.6/Accountant General. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 30.6.2010 as Headmaster from Upgraded Middle School, Hathiondha, Block- Behariganj, District Madhepura, has prayed for directing the respondents to pay the amount of Gratuity, Leave Encashment, Group Insurance and revised pension as per 6th Pay Revision. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the relief sought for in 2 the writ petition, the petitioner has filed representation before respondent no.3. However, no decision has been taken till date. It was further prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation. In view of stand taken by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.3/District Education Officer, Madhepura within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no.3 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.3 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within three months from the date of 3 filing of such representation. Court expects that after receipt of sanction order from the State authority, the respondent no.6/Accountant General will issue authorization within a period of four weeks. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)