IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 3RD JULY 2009 / 12TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 18661 of 2009(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. K.P.AHAMMED ALI, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.MOHAMMED KUTTY HAJEE(LATE), HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT(ARABIC), A.M.M.HIGH SCHOOL, P.O.PULIKKAL, MALAPPURAM-673 637. 2. K.ZAINABA, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT(ARABIC) A.M.M.HIGH SCHOOL, P.O.PULIKKAL, MALAPPURAM-673 637. 3. T.A.SAMEERA, LOWER GRADE ARABIC TEACHER, A.M.M.HIGH SCHOOL, P.O.PULIKKAL, MALAPPURAM-673 637. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-14. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. THE MANAGER, A.M.M.HIGH SCHOOL, P.O.PULIKKAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 637. R1 TO R4 BY G.P. SHRI A.J. VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 18661 of 2009-C - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 3rd day of July, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioners 1 and 2 are the claimants under Rule 43 of Chapter XIV-A K.E.R. for promotion to the post of H.S.A. (Arabic) and the third petitioner is a claimant under Rule 51-A of the Rules. Petitioners 1 and 2 were promoted as H.S.A. (Arabic) from 1.6.2005. The approval was rejected by the District Educational Officer and the appeals filed before the Deputy Director of Education and Director of Public Instruction, were also rejected by Exts.P1 to P4. The third petitioner was promoted in the vacancy of the first petitioner and that was objected by the District Educational Officer stating the same reason and the appeals have also been rejected as per Exts.P5 and P6. 2. The Manager of the school has filed Exts.P7 and P8 revision petitions before the Government and the first petitioner has filed Ext.P9 before the Government. 3. The main prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the Government to take a decision on Exts.P7 to P9 revision petitions pending before the Government. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the wpc 18661/2009 2 petitioners that going by Exts.P11 to P15 orders, it will be seen that the appointments made by the same management has been approved already. 4. There will be a direction to the first respondent to take a decision on Exts.P7 to P9 after hearing the petitioners and the manager, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioners will produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of this judgment before the Government for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/