IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20786 of 2009 1. BABITA DEVI 2. GAYATRI DEVI ---------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 23.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. There is allegation against the petitioners and others that they assaulted the deceased by means of lathi and knife and two other victims also. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that though petitioners have been also named as assailants but without specification, they are lady members of family, land dispute and other enmity was existing in between both the family members. In the discussed circumstance, the submission of learned counsel for the informant about their liability under section 34 IPC also does not justify refusal of bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named two petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten - 2 - thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in Lakhisarai PS case no. 22/2006, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI