IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42267 of 2009 JITENDRA SAH GUPTA SON OF SRI NAKHARU SAH @ NATHUNI SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MOKARI, P.S. BHABUA, DISTRICT KAIMUR. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 17.3.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant, though complainant was not made party nor any notice was issued. The petitioner, who is in custody in Complaint Case No.745 of 2007 for the offence under Sections 498(A), 406 of the Indian penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the complainant had re- married herself with one Dorha, the present case has been instituted only with a view to harass him and he had made a prayer for grant of bail. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the victim/complainant has also filed a counter affidavit and he has submitted that the said Dorha is Stranger to the complainant and he was set up by the petitioner. - 2 - N.H./ Without going into the merit of the case, since the petitioner is in custody from 11.9.2009, I am inclined to extend the privilege of bail to this petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail is allowed. Let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Kaimur at Bhabua in Complaint Case No.745 of 2007. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)