IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1445 of 2004 1. OM PRAKASH SINGH, S/O LATE SURENDRA SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-CHARMADIH, P.S.-BATH, DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR. 2. KANHAIYA PRASAD SINGH, S/O LATE RAM NANDAN PRASAD SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-BHOWA PARWAL, P.S.- RUPOULI, DISTRICT-PURNEA. 3. ALOK KUMAR SINGH, S/O JANAK KISHORE SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-KHAGRA, P.S.-NAUGACHIA, DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR. ………………PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE BIHAR HINDI SAHITYA SAMMELAN, KADAM KUAN, PATNA-3, THROUGH ITS PRIME MINISTER, BIHAR HINDI SAHITYA SAMMELAN, KADAM KUAN, PATNA-3. 2. THE PRESIDENT, BIHAR HINDI SAHITYA SAMMELAN, KADAM KUAN, PATNA-3, P.S.-KADAM KUAN, DISTRICT-PATNA. 3. THE PRIME MINISTER, BIHAR HINDI SAHITYA SAMMELAN, KADAM KUAN, PATNA-3, P.S.-KADAM KUAN, DISTRICT-PATNA. …………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 5 21.07.2010 Inspite of time granted by order dated 07.05.2007, learned counsel for the petitioners is unable to demonstrate that the respondent Bihar Hindi Sahitya Sammelan is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In the circumstances, the writ application is dismissed as not maintainable. Petitioners will be at liberty to seek their remedy in accordance with law before an appropriate forum. The pendency of the writ application in this Court may by claimed by the petitioners as a ground for condoning the 2 delay, if any, in pursuing their remedy before the appropriate forum. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)