(1) WP. 6416.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6416 OF 2010 Dnyaneshwar S/o Vithalrao Kadam and others .. Petitioners VERSUS The Returning Officer and others .. Respondents Mr. Mahesh V. Ghatge, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. S.V. Kurundkar, Addl. G.P. for the respondent-State ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 28TH JULY, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. The Petition is filed against the order dated 26th and 27th April, 2010 rendered by the Returning Officer whereby Nomination forms of the respondent no.2 to 5 were accepted notwithstanding the objections raised by the petitioners. According to the petitioners, the respondents no.2 to 5 were ineligible for the reason that they were defaulters. The impugned order dated 26.4.2010 on nomination (2) WP. 6416.2010 paper filed by Balaji Kadam i.e. respondent no.4 purports to show that no objection was raised at the time of scrutiny. The petitioners submit that in fact objection was raised. The question whether such objection was raised or not is itself, therefore, a disputed question of fact. 3. The Writ Petition does not lie wherever there is a disputed question of fact involved. The petitioners are at liberty to file Election Petition if they maintain the objections. In view the efficacious alternate remedy being available, and since the elections are already over, the Petition disposed of. Sd/- [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp