Hti C^ 1^7 (^^ W THB HO BX£HIGS COURT OF CSaSATTXSGASiHJUmCATUREAT mLASFUR W.P.ta ^3^/2009 PJBTJTJONER ; 1/ JiQrishnafeant Shccnna S/oLateShri Bhuwan LaS.Sharma Aged cubout - 58years R/0 Rajendra Prasad Nagar, H.No. 23/80,Kosa Badi Korba(C.G.) VBRSOS lUBSPQWBBWre! ^^ ^.^?.--^ ^b%p: ^•^J^-^^ ......'Si^' ^y <^---"' ^^' 1. StateofChhattisgcati. 'nzniugh Sea'etary DepartmentofHome Affwrs, Mantratay D.K.S. Bhawan, RayjurfC.G.) , 2.doQector, Bilaspur Dist-Bikx^iurfC.G.) ^ 3. Additiona! 'RahsiidGtr; BQctspurDist-Bilaspur 4. P&Kce Station, Sarfcanda, 1 Through ThWutIncheiTge PoKce Stcttmn, Sarkanda, BOaspurfC.G.) QF'^fXWS'Kl^nONOFViaWk XI-HC-22 sii^rw !<;•<[+ sn^i ?t»^ yfea Deepti -ysi niji^icf^, »Til^<is.(iwi'yy ^'n^r^'gsrg? _.^E:&l:^.^^j^ *iiti?(Tai*(i% fW^ST' 311^1'S^IWtfe? SB : Hon'bte ShrLManindra MohanlShrivastava. J 24-01-2011 e Ms. Deepaii Pandey, counsel Shri V.V.S, Murthy, Deputy) SuryakantMishra, Panel Lawyerfor In compliance of order passec) in-charge of the case has been flled, no proposal for payment of compens^tion for the petitioner draws attention of tlli been piaced before the Collector also being demanded. Shri Murthy submitted that th( accordance with taw. In view of the submissionsl consideration in this petition. Accordingly, this petition is iiberty to the petitioner to workout with further direction to respondent orders on the applications (Annexurf delay. fjsr the petitioner. Advocate General along with Shri State. by this Court, an affidavit of the Officer I wherein it has been stated that there is to the petitioner. Learned counsel |is Court to the representation which has (^nnexure P/6) wherein compensation is chl<<I^t<fl'T 'RF^f ^ 1:ST3t ^R^X ^; SlPtPT 311^1 ^ said appiication wiil be considered, in so made, nothing more survives for tfie inaiiy disposed off, however reserving remedy available under the law and No.2 to consider and pass appropriate P/6), expeditiousiy and without undue L_ .. __sd/- „,. . 1 !Manindra Mohan ShrivastavaS fcj,' Judge- pi|a