IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO. 3244 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO. 3244 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO. 3244 OF 2008 Mr Prem Kanvarrama Mulchandani, Applicant Vs State of Maharashtra, Respondent Mr Sudhir Halli, for the applicant. Mr K.K.Kurup, for the original complainant. Ms.A.T.Jhaveri,APP, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 11/12/2008 DATE : 11/12/2008 DATE : 11/12/2008 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard Mr.Halli, learned counsel for the applicant, Ms Jhaveri, learned APP, for the State and Mr Kurup, learned counsel for the complainant. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.I-133(A)/2008 of Narpoli police station,Bhiwandi. Dist-Thane. The said crime has been registered against the applicant and two others for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 420, 406,465,468, 471,504,506 read with 34 of IPC. 3. At the outset, learned APP invited my attention to the statements made in paragraph 7 of the Affidavit dated 10.12.2008 and submitted that the respondent-State has no objection for granting this application for anticipatory bail. In paragraph 7 of the affidavit it is stated that the applicant Prem Mulchandani has not played any role in the alleged offence, except that he was an employee of the applicants in Criminal Application No.3222 of 2008. In the circumstances, this application is allowed. . In the event of arrest, applicant- Prem Kanvarrama Mulchandani be released on bail in the sum of Rs.35,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount, subject to condition that the applicant shall report to the concerned police station every Saturday between 7 and 8 pm for a period of 90 days or till filing of the chargesheet, whichever is earlier. The application is disposed of. . While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case without being influenced by the observations made in this order. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)