1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3130 OF 2009 Shambhu s/o. Supadu Survade .. Petitioner Versus Smt. Surabai Ramdas Survade and others. .. Respondents Mr. G.V.Wani, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 11TH JUNE, 2009. ORAL ORDER :- 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order passed by the learned Additional Commissioner, Nasik Division Nasik, thereby dismissing the appeal filed by the preset petitioner challenging the order passed by the Additional Collector, Jalgaon, which in turn dismissed the appeal filed by the present petitioner, challenging the order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer. 2 2. The present petition arises out of entries in the record of rights maintained by the Revenue Department. The learned Additional Commissioner has, in his order, clearly mentioned that the rights of the parties are subject to the outcome of the final decision in R.C.S.No. 355/1993. 3. It is a settled law that the revenue authorities do not have any right to adjudicate upon the rights of the parties pertaining to title and that orders passed by the competent civil court are always binding upon the revenue authorities with respect to the same. In that view of the matter, no perversity could be found with approach adopted by the authorities below. Writ petition is summarily dismissed. [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/