((-1-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.171 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4127 OF 2007 Association of Advertising Pvt.Ltd. Applicant versus Madhukar Raghunath Khanvelkar Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.489 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4127 OF 2004 Association of Advertising Pvt.Ltd. Applicant versus Madhukar Raghunath Khanvelkar Respondent R.M.Patne for applicant. P.A.Pol, APP for the State. K.S.Patil, adv. for respondent no.1. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 02nd April 2009 PC : 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned advocate for the first respondent. These applications are opposed by the learned counsel for the first respondent by pointing out that no case is made out for restoration of the restoration application and no case is made out for restoring the original application for ((-2-)) leave. In view of the averments made in the applications, a case is made out for restoration of Criminal Application No.489 of 2007. 2. In view of the averments made in Criminal Application No.489 of 2007, a case is made out restoration of the application for leave. Accordingly, applications are allowed and Criminal Application No.4127 of 2007 is restored. (A.S.OKA, J.) ((-3-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4127 OF 2004 Association of Advertising Pvt.Ltd. Applicant versus Madhukar Raghunath Khanvelkar Respondent R.M.Patne for applicant. P.A.Pol, APP for the State. K.S.Patil, adv. for respondent no.1. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 02nd April 2009 PC : 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned advocate for the first respondent. Leave to prefer an appeal is granted. Appeal is admitted. Call for the record and proceedings. 2. Advocate for first respondent waives service. Hence, an action under section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is dispensed with. (A.S.OKA, J.)