Arbitration Case No.198 of 2006 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Arbitration Case No.198 of 2006 Date of Decision: 12 - 03 - 2008 Profab Systems Engineering Private Limited ....Petitioner through Mr.K.K.Saini, Advocate v. M/s Rama Industries Limited and another ....Respondents through Mr.P.K.Kukreja, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIJENDER JAIN, CHIEF JUSTICE *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** VIJENDER JAIN, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) Arbitration clause between the parties is not disputed. The invocation of arbitration is also not disputed. However, counsel for the respondents has contended that the only points are with regard to jurisdiction as well as limitation. Therefore, with the consent of the parties I appoint Justice G.C.Garg (a retired Judge of this Court) as an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon all the disputes between the parties. It will be open for the respondents to urge all the points raised before me, before the Arbitrator. Arbitration Case No.198 of 2006 [2] The Arbitrator shall fix his own fee. Intimation of appointment be sent to the Arbitrator. Parties to appear before the Arbitrator on 4.4.2008 at 11.00 A.M. Petition stands disposed of. ( VIJENDER JAIN ) March 12, 2008 CHIEF JUSTICE RC