IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.44057 of 2010 ANIL RAM son of Sarju Ram Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 14.03.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph 17 of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under section 366-A of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the statement of the alleged victim that she had gone with the petitioner out of her own sweet will and wanted to live with him, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur, Bhabua, in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.131 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do 2 so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate is directed to immediately commit the case to the Court of Sessions and the trial court in seisin of the case will pass appropriate order as to whether any offence is made out against the accused persons in view of the statement of the victim recorded under section 164 Cr. P. C. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)