IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (SB) No. 386 of 2004 Sita Ram Goyal …Petitioner. Versus State of Uttaranchal and others. …Respondents. Mr. Manoj Sah, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Bindesh Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J, (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the parties are agreed that the instant Writ Petition has to be disposed of in terms of the order passed in State of Uttaranchal Vs. Sita Ram Goyal and others (Writ Petition (S/B) No. 298 of 2003, decided on 8.3.2006). 2. In view of the above, the instant Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court on 8.3.2006 in State of Uttaranchal Vs. Sita Ram Goyal and others (Writ Petition (S/B) No. 298 of 2003) (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 4.6.2010 Rathour