3108appln702.10.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 702 OF 2010 (Mahindersingh Singarasingh Randhawa Vs. State of Maharashtra) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Ms Monica Arland, Adv. H/f Mr. AM Rizwy, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. N. W. Sambre, P. P. for the respondent-State. CORAM : A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATED : 31st August, 2010. Heard. The learned Advocate for the applicant contended that the applicant was granted benefit of interim anticipatory bail on 06/5/2010. The applicant, since 06/5/2010, was not arrested and the investigating agency did not felt it necessary to arrest the applicant, although, the interim order was subjected to “in the event of arrest of the applicant”. Be that as it may, the interim anticipatory bail, as granted on 06/5/2010, is confirmed subject to condition that; (i) Applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when necessary. (ii) Applicant shall not tamper with prosecution evidence in any manner. (iii) The applicant shall inform his fixed address with telephone/ mobile number, if any, to the concerned Investigating Officer, and (iv) He shall not misuse his liberty in any manner and shall not commit any crime while on bail. The applicant shall approach the regular Court for bail on merits after the charge-sheet is filed. The application stands disposed of. JUDGE wwl