CWP-6388/2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. SB CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6388/2010 Shrawan Singh Versus The Union of India & anr. DATE OF ORDER : 07/05/2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI *** Dr.Swati Bhati, for petitioner. Instant petition has been filed by petitioner basically assailing the order dt. 14/01/2010 (Anx.4) whereby the petitioner has not been found eligible for awarding Rajiv Gandhi LPG Vitrak (RGGLV) at Guda, District- Jhunjhunu under CC category advised on 17/10/2009 on the premise that he was not resident of the advertised location. The petitioner, immediately thereafter, as alleged, obtained a certificate (Anx. 5) dt. 22/01/2010 form Tehsildar, Udaipurwati in which it was clarified that there is no revenue village with the name of Guda and village Dudagodji is called with the name of Guda. The petitioner submitted application for awarding Rajiv Gandhi LPG Vitrak (RGGLV) at Guda, District- Jhunjhunu under CC category in pursuance to the advertisement Anx.1 dt. 17/10/2009. However, the respondents, without proceeding further in reference to the advertisement Anx.1, issued a fresh advertisement Anx. 6 dt. 13/03/2010 the CWP-6388/2010 2 aforesaid dealership has been kept reserved for SC (Female) category. Counsel submits that the order of rejection (Anx.4) is wholly arbitrary and the petitioner is resident of Village Gudagorji as clarified by the Tehsildar Udaipurwati vide its certificate dt. 22/01/2010 and in such circumstances, the rejection made by the respondents rejecting candidature of the petitioner cannot be said to be justified. There may be some justification in what has been urged by counsel for the petitioner but in the opinion of this Court, since the respondents have not proceeded further in reference to the advertisement Anx. 1 dt. 17/10/2009 and the very place, which was earlier categorized as CC (combined category), has now been kept reserved for SC (Female) by fresh advertisement dt. 13/03/2010 and the petitioner indisputably is not a member of SC category for which the place has been notified/reserved and indeed he is not eligible to participate in the process which the respondents have initiated in pursuance to the advertisement Anx. 6 dt. 13/03/2010. In such circumstances, the submission made, in the facts of the instant case, has no substance and merely because advertisement was issued and the petitioner had participated, will not CWP-6388/2010 3 confer any right particularly when the respondents later on issued fresh advertisement dt. 13/03/2010 (Anx.6) and the place in question has been kept reserved for SC (female). In such circumstances, this Court does not find any substance in the writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. Raghu/p.3/ 6388-CW-2010-final.doc