IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28951 of 2010 LAKSHMAN SAH @ LAKSHMAN KUMAR S/O LATE FAGU SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 25.08.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 25 (1-b), A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Section 3/4 of Explosive Substance Act. By an order dated 2.7.2010 vide Cr.Misc. No. 12923 of 2010 the petitioner was refused bail with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It has been submitted that the charge was already framed on 30.3.2010. Considering the same as also that the petitioner has remained in custody since 9.11.2009 and there in only one other case pending against the petitioner, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions 2 Judge, 6th Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with S.Tr. No. 68/2010, Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No. 891/2009, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the mother of the petitioner. who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The fact that there is only one other case pending against the petitioner will be verified by the court concerned before releasing the petitioner on bail. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )