IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 6841 OF 2005. PETITION NO. 6841 OF 2005. PETITION NO. 6841 OF 2005. Shri Harpalsing Pritamsing Ahluwaliya. ... Petitioner. V/s. Dr.Vikram Shantaram Ghole. ... Respondent. S.B.Deshmukh for the petitioner. G.M.Joshi for the respondent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 8th December 2005. 8th December 2005. 8th December 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. . The petitioner has suffered concurrent findings of fact and both the Courts below have appreciated the evidence in its proper perspective. No material is produced on record to show that the impugned judgments are perverse. The view taken by the Courts below is a reasonable and possible view on all counts. I concur with the reasons given by the Courts below. . Thus, for the reasons recorded herein and for the reasons recorded in the impugned judgments, petition is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, J.) J.) J.)