IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2886 of 2011 SARYUG MUKHIYA, SON OF BAL DEO MUKHIYA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 14.03.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. It would appear from perusal of the F.I.R. that petitioner assaulted the informant’s husband with fists and slaps on a petty matter. It appears on account of the aforesaid assault the informant’s husband died in next morning of the alleged occurrence. The postmortem report of the deceased reflects that rapture of spleen was found in course of postmortem examination, but contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there was no intention of the petitioner to kill the deceased as it evident from the prosecution case itself. Taking into consideration the above stated submissions as well as facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the petitioner, namely, Saryug Mukhiya to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Khirhar P.S. Case No.32 of 2010. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)