Civil Revision No. 7634 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 7634 of 2010 Date of Decision: 16.12.2010 Baldev Krishan and Another …Petitioners Versus Smt. Sadhna …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Ms. Divya Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ajay Kaushik, Advocate for the respondent. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) I have heard learned counsel for the parties. They are in agreement that in case the eviction petition, filed by the petitioners, is decided within a stipulated period, the ends of justice will be served. Accordingly, the prayer made by learned counsel for the parties is accepted. The Rent Controller, Panchkula, is directed to decide the eviction petition within a period of four months from today. The trial is made time bound especially when it is projected by learned counsel for the petitiones/landlords that for non payment of rent, so assessed by the Rent Controller, the petitioners are suffering as huge arrears of rent has been accumulated. This Court has no doubt that while deciding the Civil Revision No. 7634 of 2010 2 eviction petition, within a stipulated time frame, the Rent Controller shall follow the mandate of law laid down in Rakesh Wadhawan and Others v. M/s Jagdamba Industrial Corporation and Others AIR 2002 Supreme Court 2004 as interpreted by the Division Bench of this Court in Rajan alias Raj Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar 2010 (1) Rent Control Reporter 386. With the observations made above, the present revision petition is disposed of. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge December 16, 2010 “DK”