IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.20848 of 2011 Date of decision: 11.11.2011 Harjinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Rajan Gupta, J (oral). Only grievance of the petitioner is with regard to para 15 of the appointment letter wherein it was stipulated that petitioner would be governed by new contributory pension scheme. However, according to counsel, the said scheme is not applicable to the petitioner for the reason that he is in service since the year 1998. He submits that a legal notice, Annexure P-13 has already been served on the respondents. Notice of motion. On asking of the court, Mr. B.S. Chahal, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice. He submits that the concerned authority shall take a decision on the legal notice, Annexure P-13, served by the petitioner within a period of four months. In view of the statement made by the State counsel, no further orders are required to be passed in this case. Disposed of. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 11.11.2011 'rajpal'