IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1689 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:14.03.2011 M/s Assa Ram Ved Parkash through LRs of Sh. Ved Parkash (deceased)- proprietor of the Firm . . .Petitioners Versus Puran Chand and others . . . Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Arihant Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he does not want to argue the case on merits, however, since they are settled in the demised premises for quite a long time, therefore, they may be granted a reasonable time to vacate. Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocate, holding a watching brief appeared with the permission of Court along with landlords. He has submitted that reasonable time may be granted to the tenant to vacate the demised premises. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners are granted six months time to vacate the demised premises on 14.9.2011. They shall furnish adequate undertaking before the Rent Controller within 15 days of the receipt of the certified copy of this order that they would vacate the demised premises on the date fixed by this Court and shall also pay the entire arrears of rent, if any due, and shall keep on paying the rent of the ensuing months at the rate on which they have been already making the payment. It is made clear that in case of any violation of the undertaking given by the petitioners before the Rent Controller, they would be liable to be proceeded against in accordance with the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MARCH 14, 2011 JUDGE Vivek