IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36571 of 2011 Kamlesh Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 15.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 19.4.2010 in a case registered under section 302, 120B of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act. It would appear from perusal of the impugned order that name of this petitioner has come in this case in the confessional statement of co-accused Bachchu Mahto. Admittedly, Bachchu Mahto has already been granted privilege of bail by another bench of this court and apart from this, several named accused persons have also been released on bail by different benches of this court. Accordingly, petitioner, Kamlesh Mahto, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge FTC No. III, Sheikhpura in Sessions Trial no. 287/2006 arising out of Sheikhpura P.S. Case no. 243/2005 subject to the conditions that petitioner shall ensure his presence before the learned trial court on each and every date for the period of seven months and if he fails to do so on three consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. It goes without saying that the learned trial court shall take all possible steps to conclude the trial of the petitioner within the - 2 - above stated period. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)