IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19993 of 2009 AMRENDRA TIWARI, SON OF MADHESHWAR TIWARI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BABANI POLICE STATION- MOHANPUR, DISTRICT GAYA, AT PRESENT MOHALLA ASHOK NAGAR, POLICE STATION RAM PUR, DISTRICT GAYA. Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.26201 of 2009 1. DHARMENDRA YADAV SON OF LATE SUDAMA YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE HUSSENABAD, P.S. OBRA, DISTRICT AURANGABAD. 2. BIRENDRA YADAV SON OF SATY NARAIN YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE FESAR, P.S. JAMHOR, DISTRICT AURANGABAD. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6. 4.3.2010. Heard Mr. Rana Pratap Singh, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the informant and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners are in custody in Sone Nagar Rail P.S. Case No.19 of 2008 for the offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. While the case was taken up, learned counsel for the informant produced certified copy of order sheet and also deposition of some of the witnesses, who have been examined in support of prosecution case. Let it be kept on record. Without going into the merit of the - 2 - N.H./ case, since trial is continuing and as submitted by the learned counsel for the informant that trial is at the fag end, I am not going into the merit of the case and accordingly, prayer for bail of all the petitioners is rejected. However, since petitioners are in jail and number of witnesses have already been examined, it is desirable to direct the trial court to conclude the trial within a period of six months from today, failing which the petitioners shall be entitled to renew their prayer for bail. It is also clarified that during the trial, the defence will also cooperate and may not take adjournment on flimsy ground. With above observation and direction, the prayer for bail of all the petitioners is rejected. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)