.-^ ^^y :<^^->^..--"' ^^^.^^" •^.y ^"\^"" ^^..- w^" IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION(S) NQ.71^ OF 2010 PETITIONER: VERSUS RESPONDENT(S):1. Mahendra Kumar Diwedi, Aged About- 54 Years, S/o- Shri Ambika Prasad Diwedi, Occupation- Working as Guard at Barrier-Chanti, Forest Range Kunwarpur, Forest Division- Manendragarh, Distt. Koriya (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division- Manendragarh, Distt. Koriya (C.G.) ^" 3. Forest Range Officer (General), Forest Range Kunwarpur, Forest Division- Manendragarh, Distt. Koriya (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA F 377^T^T f^ri?T37lt?T ^^ict) <if^a ^s^ ^WM^, ^-nl^^Ko, fa<ni^^< SIT^T XT5T^ ..y:£^..7...^;it^ i '^ 200 ^ HWCr[T 5b*«cb 'fq^ST" ^TT^T'^TTW^TT SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITIB 07.12.2010 Shri Vinay Pandey, counsel foi Shri Ajit Singh, P.1. for the stat Grievance of the petitioner in year 1997, he was appointed as Guai services have not been regularizell according to him^ as per circular entitled for his regularization. Counsel for the petitioner sul he has approached the respondents orally assured for his regularization been passed. He submits that his pending before the respondent No.! ser^ed if direction is issued to the representation. State counsel submits that representation along with the copy o| No.2 would decide the same afte^ circumstances of the case. Accordingly, the petition is di petitioner to make a fresh represen| period of three weeks from the date 4 in turn the resp. No.2 shall consider) of three months from the date of its It is made clear that this Coijrt on merits of the case and the authoil to decide the some strictly in accord^i cbl^f^4l<1 'WT^ff ^ i^Q <py|^l< '^3Tf^m^3n^T KER DIWAKBR the petitioner. pie present petition is that in the (d on daily wages but till date his by the respondents though [dated 5.3.08, the petitioner is ^mits that on various occasions, md every time the petitioner was Ibut till date no formal order has tepresentation dated 1.7.2010 is and ends of justice would be ?sp. No.2 to decide his pending let the petitioner make a fresh this order and in turn the resp. considering all the facts and sposed of with a direction to the ation to the resp. N0.2 within a receipt of copy of this order and the same within a further period sceipt. has not expressed any opinion ity concerned would be at liberty .nce with law. Sd/- pritinker Diwaker judge