Crl. Misc. A. No. 1010-MA of 2011 [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. A. No. 1010-MA of 2011 Date of Decision: March 1,2012 Varsha Sharma .......................................... Applicant Versus Amrit Lal and others .............................. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. L.M.Gulati, Advocate for the applicant. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) This Application is against the order dated 14.10.2011 whereby the Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar, has allowed the appeal and set aside the conviction order dated 1.6.2009 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Amritsar. The allegation in the FIR was that the accused had jumped over the wall of the house of the complainant and caused injuries to them. The injured is Varsha daughter of Amar Nath. PW3 Dr. Jeewan Gupta had given an opinion PW3/A that injury No.1 was grievous in nature. This injury Crl. Misc. A. No. 1010-MA of 2011 [ 2 ] was on account of a missing tooth. The doctor admitted that this injury could be due to a fall on hard surface. The conviction has been set aside on the ground that it was beyond imagination that Amrit Lal aged 70 years and his wife Sunita aged 65 years and their daughter Pooja could climb and jump over the wall and caused injuries to the complainant. There was no corresponding injury on the lip or inside the mouth from where the tooth is said to have been dislocated. The material witness Satya Devi has not been produced by the prosecution. The impugned judgment does not suffer from any misreading of evidence and calls for no interference. Dismissed. 1.3.2012 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE