IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3432 of 2006 RAGHUNANDAN PASWAN SON OF LATE SABHA PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – RAMDEO CHAK, POST OFFICE BHAWAR SIKARIA, P.S. AND DISTRICT JEHANABAD. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, JEHANABAD. 3. THE ADDL. COLLECTOR (NAXAL) JEHANABAD. 4. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER-CUM-INQUIRY CONDUCTING OFFICER, JEHANABAD. 5. ANCHAL ADHIKARI, JEHANABAD. ----------- 04. 26.07.2010 Heard the parties. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 to 5 copy of which has been served to the counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State submits that the details of the payment have been made to the petitioner during the pendency of the writ application as stated in paragraph 8 and 9 of the writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the payments have been made after a long delay and as such, petitioner is entitled to reasonable interest. Considering the submissions made above, this writ application stands disposed of. However, petitioner will be at liberty to represent his grievance for interest permissible under the rules, if any. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)