IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.28035 of 2011 Arvind Rai @ Arvind Kumar son of Sudhist Narayan Rai Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2/ 16.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 379, 406, 417, 420 of the Indian Penal Code section 135, 138, 139 and 140 of the Indian Electricity Act. It has been submitted that the petitioner is ready to deposit rupees fifty thousand as part-payment of the money due to the Electricity Board and thereafter will pay the rest of the amount after final assessment is made by the Board after compounding the offence under section 152 of the Electricity Act. Considering the same, if the petitioner, named above, deposits rupees fifty thousand with the Electricity Board and surrenders before the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in connection with Tajpur (Pusa) P.S. Case No.294 of 2010, he shall be released on provisional anticipatory bail for a period of four months to be calculated from the date of release of the petitioner on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C., and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish 2 information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner. The provisional bail of the petitioner shall be confirmed once the petitioner produces proof of the fact that final settlement of his dues has been done with the Electricity Board. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)