IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 25TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 30488 of 2011(I) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. T.MANIKANTAN,S/O.M.GOPI,AGED 24 YEARS, RESIDING AT THAYYULLATHIL SHAKTI HOUSE, CHOKLI.P.O,THALASSERY,KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. SANIF.K.H,KOTTAMOOLA MANAKKATTARAKUDY HOUSE,KUZHIVELIPPADY,EDATHALA.P.O,ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. PUTHUKKKATTU PRATHISH VARGHESE, NOW RESIDING AT THAYYULLATHIL SHAKTI HOUSE, CHOKLI.P.O,THALASSERY,KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT,REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR,OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY,CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-PIN-673 635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT,OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS,CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-PIN-673 635. R1 & R2 BY ADV.SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW,SC, CALICUT UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.30488/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT-P1: THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION, SCRUTINY AND PHOTOCOPY OF THE ANSWER SHEET SUBMITTED BY THE IST PETITIONER DATED:31-10-2011. EXT-P2: THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION, SCRUTINY AND PHOTOCOPY OF THE ANSWER SHEET SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED31-10-2011. EXT-P3: THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION, SCRUTINY AND PHOTOCOPY OF THE ANSWER SHEET SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER DATED:31-10-2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 30488 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 4th Semester examination was declared, they had failed in one or two papers. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge