@ / W cw) IN Ti-E HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIL$PUR{CWTTEIGAm-i§ WRIT pE'rrrlow no. 2?;5 OF 2003 g 1. M.L.Pandey, son of Smri H.P.Pandey. * 1 ‘1 aged about 6o years. Retired Ds tri c Marke ting Of f icer , (Accounts Officer, ..S»tate Ca-op} ‘1 erative Marking Feéetien Ltd 1 resident. cf windnagarJwira Vihax‘! Siarkanda ,Bilasput (Cv ) PETITIom 2‘ Ganesh PraSad Soni.5on of te la $r Chheddu Lal $om,age& about 60 hi ; years resident of Mahob Baza(. irapu ad,rvoday Colony. aib, Rip Ttandh aur, (CQG. ) \. “x \ Slu l h K Ban nd x 3. kh Sagar Singh Thakur.son of ate Kundal Singh Takur, Retired Manager,isan Rice M111, ana Bazar,aajnagaon, presently reSiding at V111age Kewtara,P.o. gajapistrict—Durg . (C°G. ) 1i . Chha ttis garh State Co-operative Marke ting Federtion Ltd. Toug iw $eeere tary. w 880 . civil Lines , Head Quarter Ra ipur, (C.G¢ ) Managing Directo, hhattisgar State Co-Opera tive Marketing deration Ltd. Raipur. 3. Accountant General .Madhya Prade Gwalior, (M ,P .) I ) wan pmruon Imam mzcms. 225?227 4b? m com'rrwuon OF IbDHs. ; The petitioners above‘named most reSpectfully beg to oeozooo i t CG a et ra . a eg ,‘ a Hr “Ro$ia a hrh r ch Fe sh w‘éS”. 13.02.2064 Shn' Prashant Mi$hra, Shri Shajlsndra Shuk N.K. Shukla‘, Sr. Counsal for The petitiouer has p legality, validity and proprim 3) whcxtby the. rcspondai amounts running into Lacs d because of audit objection d It has been mentioned that ground that during the y particular Kisan Rice Mill 2 Shortage in quantity of pad limit. Leai ed counsel for shortage was Within the pern hearing was given to the p poeition and in the audit shortage was found. Howew (ieducted while conducting a General, Gwalior. In the cimumstance petitioners submite that the a detailed representation 1 counsel for the petitioners. 1a, Adv. appeaxs on behalf of Dr. respondent No. 1 o5 2. Iefened this Writ Peiif’ion under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India challenging the y of the orders (Annexure P—l to P— ts have ordered for recovery o if rupees from each of the petitioner f the Accountant General, Gwalior. the recovery is being made on the losting of the petitionérs in the n the year 199396 85 96—97 the sly was more than the permissible the petitioner submits that the iissible limits and no oyportunity of etitioners in order to exylain their conducted by the department no :r, all of a sudden the shortage was udit by the ohice of the Accountant s the learned counsel petitioners may be allowed ‘o respondent No.1 and for the to make in turn f 3mm W ’ - mmimém mmm (23 awfmm mspoident No.1 may be dirEcted to decide the raresenfation ’ aftey oOnsidering the points raSed by the petitioner Havinv hcard the leanmd counsel for th ass and wmg mgard to the facts and cucumstamces of the cas the gentlonerS are allowed to mak= a detaJled repressntang ‘ail then? gnevance$ ‘Wlthm 15: days from today mpdent No. 1 and in turn respondeiit No. 1 after considering all the points raised by tho petitione ‘s’ shall docide thempresetation within a period of 60 days fro: the date of receipt of the me in an objective manner in accord lee with the law. /With the above direction ‘ the petition stands disposed of. In View of this orde, M.W,P.No.25392003' 85 LA. No.8354/ 2003 for urgent healing stand disposed o Certified copy as per rule s. [niéw s p a pm e uoILgEm to gon n sa / £/