IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH MAY 2011 / 20TH VAISAKHA 1933 WP(C).No. 13286 of 2011(I) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------------- 1. SUDEEP P.K., 25 YEARS, S/O. ARAVINDAKSHAN P.P., SRINILAYAM, PANDAMANGALAM, KOTTAKKAL, MALAPPURAM. 2. SAJEEV BHASKARAN P.O., S/O. BHASKARAN, PANNIKKODE HOUSE, PANDAMANGALAM, KOTTAKKAL P.O., MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 635. 2. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 635. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, NEHRU COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEACH CENTRE, PAMPADY, TRICHUR - 678 073. BY STANDING COUSNEL SRI P.C. SASIDHARAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.K.MOHANAN,J. ----------------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.13286 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of May, 2011 J U D G M E N T Grievance of the petitioners is that though the petitioners had preferred applications for re-valuation of their answer scripts of the IVth and 6th Semester of B.Tech.Information and Technology course as sought in Exts.P1, P2 and P2(a), the same have not been considered so far and no result is published. The Ist petitioner applied for revaluation of 6th Semester (Computer Architect) as per Ext.P1; the 2nd petitioner applied for computer Net works and Computer Architecture vide Ext.P2 application; the 2nd petitioner also applied for revaluation of 4th semester of B.Tech in Micro Processor based design (ITO4 404) vide Exts.P2(a) application. 2. Standing counsel for the respondents submitted that if the applications preferred by the petitioners are proper, the same can be W.P(C)NO.13256 of 2011 :-2-: directed to be disposed of within a reasonable time. 3. In the light of the above facts and circumstances involved in the case and in view of the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to revalue the papers of the petitioners as requested by them as per Exts.P1, P2 and P2(a) applications if the said applications are otherwise in order and publish the result within ten weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment which will be produced by the petitioners. The writ petition is disposed of as above. V.K.MOHANAN, Judge. KVM/- W.P(C)NO.13256 of 2011 :-3-: