IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30235 of 2008 GEETA MISHRA W/O LATGE BASHISTHA MUNI MISHRA, OF CHHOTAKA SINGHANPURA, P.S.- SIMARI, DISTRICT-BUIXAR. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.10.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and for the informant, who has appeared suo motu. The petitioner, who is mother-in-law, apprehends arrest in a complaint case sent for investigation under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. under Section 498 A, 494 of the Penal Code and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel submits that the allegations themselves admit that the original complainant was earlier married to the elder son of the petitioner. He has since been deceased when she claims remarried with the younger brother of her husband. During the life time of the elder son of the petitioner there have been no allegations for demand of dowry. The present allegations are for oblique purpose for the estate of the deceased husband. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of six weeks from today, when she shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Buxar in Simari P.S. Case No. 22 of 2008, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)