1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 6. CRA/37/2008 [Civil] With CA/9162/2007 In CRA/37/2008 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. A.G.Dalal, Adv., h/f Mrs. Kalplata Patil, Adv., for respondent. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:18/11/2010 ... 1. Heard. Counsel for the petitioner called. Absent. Record illustrates, the matter is not diligently attended by the learned Counsel. Concurrent findings are subject of question in the Civil Revision Application. The provisions of Mohemmedan Law are tried to be interpreted. However, both the Courts have concurrently held the entitlement of the respondent. I do not see any perversity in the order under challenge. Civil Revision Application, with Civil 2 Application, is dismissed. No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/37-08cra