-1- FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 3882/2008. ( Haribhau Marotrao Khinkhinkar .vrs. The Assistant Charity Commissioner ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or Directions Court's or Judge's Orders. And Registrar's Orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : OCTOBER 15, 2008. Heard Advocate Shri Bhandarkar, for petitioners. Perused the impugned order. I am satisfied that no case for enquiry into any mis appropriation is being made out. There are Government Officers as nominated Trustees and they can always at appropriate times supervise the actual working of the Trust. The impugned order does not suffer from any perversity. The change report which is filed by the respondent nos. 2 and 3 is stated to be of the year 2007, and Advocate Shri Bhandarkar states that it has been filed only after the application under section 41-A of the -2- Bombay Public Trust Act, was moved by the petitioners. Assistant Charity Commissioner, Gadchiroli to endeavor to decide the said change report as expeditiously as possible. Advocate Shri Bhandarkar further states that the petitioners may not be heard in suo motu proceedings under section 50-A[3] of the Act. I find the apprehension pre-mature and also misconceived. If the petitioners satisfies the relevant requirement, they are entitled to be heard and they can also move appropriate application in those proceedings before the Assistant Charity Commissioner exercising their rights. With these observations Writ Petition is dismissed. No cost. JUDGE Rgd.