THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.17767 OF 2009 DATED: 26.08.2009 Between: Rayana Chinna Rao .. Petitioner And The Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam. .. Respondent ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent. Petitioner claims that he had been in possession of the land in an extent of 48 square yards in Sy.No.20 situated at Pineapple Colony, Mudasarlova Village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam, and to that effect the respondent- Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, has also issued a Land Possession Certificate, vide proceedings dated 05.08.2006. It is his case that he intended to construct a house in the said land, but, as he had to leave for Bhrempur in Orissa to attend to his brother who fell ill, he entrusted the supervision of the construction work of the house to one P. Rajeswara Rao, resident of the same locality. While so, the said Rajeswara Rao, after completion of the construction of the house in the aforesaid land, colluded with one K. Varalakshmi and allowed her to occupy the said house. Thereupon, the petitioner complained to the revenue authorities about the said illegal occupation of his property and also obtained information that no Land Possession Certificate was issued in favour of the said Varalakshmi in respect of the subject land, but no action has been taken by the revenue authorities for evicting the said Varalakshmi from the subject property. It is the grievance of the petitioner that, he again submitted a representation dated 13.05.2008 to the respondent, seeking to take action for handing over his property to him by removing the encroachments, but the same has not been acted upon, and, therefore, he was constrained to issue a legal notice dated 27.07.2009, for which also there was no response from the respondent. In the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits, the respondent is directed to consider the representation dated 13.05.2008 purported to have been submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders as per law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 26th August, 2009. IBL