IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6399 of 2010 Date of Decision: October 01, 2010 Mahipal and others. …Petitioners Versus Chaman Singh and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate, for the petitioners. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 24.09.2010 passed by learned Executing Court/Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dera Bassi, whereby the objections filed before the learned Executing Court by the petitioners were dismissed and Executing Court has directed to execute the sale deed pursuant to the judgment passed by this Court on 25.11.2005. The brief facts of the present case are that Mahavir has filed a suit for specific performance of contract against Balram. This Court in Second Appeal vide judgment dated C.R. No. 6399 of 2010 25.11.2005 has directed that Balram shall execute the sale deed pursuant to the agreement dated 10.12.1982. It has further been held that sale deed shall be reckoned to be a sale of area for the share of Balram and shall be subject to the final partition between the parties. The only apprehension of the petitioners is that LRs of Balram shall execute the sale deed beyond their shares and the rights of the petitioners would be affected. Apprehension is misconceived. The sale deed is to be executed by LRs of Balram pursuant to the decree. Decree passed in the suit for specific performance by this Court in the second appeal is confined to the share of Balram only and any part of the sale deed beyond the share of Balram shall not affect the rights of the petitioners. With these observations, present petition shall stand disposed of. October 01, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2