THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1124 OF 2010 ORDER: The petitioner, who is the appellant before the lower appellate Court, files this revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to assail the order dated 02.03.2010 in I.A.No.28 of 2010 in A.S.No.83 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tenali, in dismissing the application filed to receive additional evidence by appointing Advocate Commissioner, to note the physical features of the disputed schedule shop and to receive work memos, if any and to file his report. After considering the submissions made, the Court below dismissed the said application. Hence, the revision. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of the material available on record, it is seen that request of this nature normally made at the time of hearing do not warrant any interference. It is always open for the petitioner to proceed with the same and canvass such appointment. Further, this revision is quite premature. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to canvass the appointment of Commissioner at the time of disposal of the appeal. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 19th March 2010 RRB