THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.13892 of 2009 Dated 18th April, 2011 Between: M/s.Hindustan Construction Company Limited …Petitioner And State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by Principal Secretary to Government, Irrigation & CAD Dept., Secretariat Building, Hyderabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri K.B.Upender Sayur For Sri S.Rambabu Counsel for respondents: AGP for Irrigation & CAD The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction to the Respondents to reimburse the difference in enhanced seigniorage charges and seigniorage charges mentioned in Agreement No.11SE/2004-2005, dated 23.10.2004 along with interest @ 18% pa.” Sri K.B.Upender Sayur, learned counsel, representing Sri S.Rambabu, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that in view of Memo No.28227/MAJ,IRRI.1(2)/2009, dated 1802.2011, issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh agreeing for inclusion of the differential seigniorage charges in the contract, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition in the event the said Memo is not implemented. Having regard to this submission, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.Nos.18182/2009, 2976, 2977 and 2978 of 2010 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 18th April, 2011 VGB