1 15 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6885/2009. Ram Narayan Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 20th July 2009. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. I.R. Choudhary ] Mr. M.R. Choudhary ], for the petitioner. ... BY THE COURT: Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the material placed on record, this Court is unable to find any reason to entertain this writ petition. The relevant back ground aspects of the matter are that the petitioner, who had been the Chairman of Badabas Gram Seva Sahakari Samiti Ltd., Badabas was held liable for misappropriation of funds of the society after an inquiry under Section 74 of the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 1965; and the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bikaner directed him to deposit an amount of Rs. 45,319.15 together with interest @ 18% per annum and another amount of Rs. 200/- towards process fees by the order dated 30.03.1991 (Annex.1). The appeal preferred by the petitioner against the 2 order so passed was dismissed by the Additional Registrar (Appeals), Co-operative Societies, Jodhpur on 31.05.1994 (Annex.2) and the revision petition as preferred by the petitioner before the Hon'ble Co-operative Minister was also dismissed on 13.12.1994 (Annex.3). The petitioner attempted to question the orders aforesaid in a writ petition before this Court but the said writ petition, CWP No. 1102/1995, was also dismissed by this Court on 22.04.1999 (Annex.4). It appears that the proceedings for recovery of the amount due from the petitioner had already commenced on 06.05.1991 and attachment warrant had been issued but then, the recovery proceedings remained in abeyance for taking up of the matter in the aforesaid appeal, revision, and writ petition. However, ultimately, the respondents resumed the recovery proceedings and proceeded to attach the petitioner's immoveable property. The petitioner was, however, informed by the communication dated 01.07.2002 (Annex.5) that his property was to be auctioned but he had a last opportunity to make payment. The petitioner, instead of availing such opportunity and making payment, chose to question the said communication dated 01.07.2002 before the Additional Registrar (Appeals), Co-operative Societies, Jodhpur who declined to interfere 3 while finding the impugned one to be only a reminder for payment and not a warrant of attachment. The petitioner yet submitted a so-called revision petition before the Hon'ble Co-operative Minister who proceeded to reject the same as being entirely baseless by the order dated 30.10.2007. The petitioner has filed this writ petition in yet further attempt to somehow avoid the recovery proceedings. The liability of the petitioner having already been adjudicated upon and the petitioner having lost his challenge to the principal order right upto this Court in writ jurisdiction; and then, the attachment order having already become final, and the belated attempt to take up the matter in further appeal and revision having failed, there appears no reason whatsoever to consider any interference in the recovery proceedings as adopted against the petitioner. The petition stands rejected. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. //Mohan//