i[il HIOH<;OURT OF JUUCATUFS GHHAmS®ARH:BILASPUR CORAM^i HON'BLESHRIS.RJllAYAK.CJ. HON'BL-E SHRI V.K.SHRIVASTAVA, J. APPEtsLANT : APPUCANt Misc Appeal (C t No.294 of MOS Shyamlal Veima S/o GamUiirtal Verma, aged about 38 years, Agriculturist and Pauttry Farm Owner.R/o Ghumka, Distt.Rajnandgaon Vereus RESPONDENTS: NON.APPLCANTS 1. Tanresh Kumar Verma S/o Victeshiram Verma aged alxnjt 22 years, Driver 2. Vktoshiram Venna S/o Sukhram Verma ^ed about 55 yeare, owner of the vehtele Botb are resident of Village - hlarduwa, Tah.Ghumka, Oistt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) PRESENT: Shri V.K.Sharma, counsel for the appeUarrt. ORAL ORDER ( Dated 16m November, 2006) The fbllowing oral order of the Court was passed by S.R.Nayak.&L : In thte appeal, the appellant-injured has sought fer more compensatlon. Leamed counsel for theappellant would submt thrt ftough the appeltant has sustained 30% permanent disabil^f on r^ht teg, the MfiCT hse not awarded reasonable compensation towards loss of Tuture Income ner anythjng towards loss of amenities of llfe. It was next contended by teEmed counsel tor the appellant that though the appellant / clalmant produced mediea) bills of Rs.4S,000/-, the MACT has awarded a sum of Rs. 11,000t- only towards medlcal expenses. These were the only two contentions uiged by tearned ooun^l for the appellant-injured. We do not flnd merit in both ttie contenttons. Admlttedly, the appellaiit dk} not examine the doctor in the case. Whether the appellart has sustained pem»Tentdisabiltty and if it is so, what fe the degree of permanait disability and in terms of functional efficaey of the injured how that disablWy / 'L- would operate in future ^c. squarely felt wlthin the domain of the medical evktence. Since there Is trtal taok (rf substantlve legal evldenoe, the MACT cannot be blamed that it commltted material tiTegularity In nrt taklng the un-testlfled oertBfcate produeed by the appellant. The see<md contention te requiredto be noticed only to be rejeeted. We have perused the impugned award. In para 20 of the impugned award the MACT pointed out that the appellant has preduced medical bilts only for Rs. 10,283/- and on ttiat basis the MACT has awarded a sum of Rs. 11,CX)0/- towards medical expenses. Nothlrg Is placed befwe us to show that the appellant has produced medtoal bills for Rs. 45,000/-. The appeal is devold of merit and it is accordingly dismissed. No eosts. Sd/- Chief Justice _^L Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge ^