1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.02.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2290 of 2011 1.K.Kalyani 2.K.Marimuthu 3.K.Murugesan 4.K.Kannan 5.R.Sathya 6.Mahalakshmi ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Inspector of Police, West Police Station, Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondents to afford sufficient protection to the life of the petitioners based on their representation dated 30.01.2011. For Petitioners : Mr.Kanimozhi Suresh For Respondents : Mr.L.Murugan Govt. Advocate (Crl.side) for R1 O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to afford sufficient protection to the life of the petitioners based on their representation dated 30.01.2011. 2. Heard Mr.Kanimozhi Suresh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.L.Murugan, learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondents. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that due to a dispute arose between the 1st petitioner’s son viz., Pandiarajan and her house owner viz., Rani, the petitioners also being threatened by the said Rani and her son Gowrishankar unnecessarily. He would further submit that the petitioners have no knowledge about the money transaction between the 1st petitioner’s son Pandiarajan and said Rani and they have no liability to it. He would further submit that the said persons have also ill-treated the petitioners by urging to lodge false complaint against them by hurting them both physically and mentally. He would further submit that on 30.01.2011, the 1st petitioner made a representation before the Superintendent of Police, the 1st respondent herein for giving police protection to the petitioners, but, no steps has https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 been taken so far. Therefore, he would request the Court to give adequate police protection to the petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit that they would give police protection to the life and limb of the petitioners. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (criminal side), the respondent police is directed to give police protection to the life and limb of the petitioners. 6. With the above said direction, this criminal original petition is ordered accordingly to that extent. vsm Sd/- Assistant Registrar[CO] /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Inspector of Police, West Police Station, Dindigul District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 cc to Mr.Kanimozhy Suresh, Advocate SR.No.10020. Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2290 of 2011 Dated:23.02.2011 2P/5C RPB 10.03.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/