Civil Revision No. 4067 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4067 of 2011 Date of Decision: 29.7.2011 *** Kanhiya Lal .. Petitioner Vs. Sita Ram & Ors. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. S.K. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The petitioner is aggrieved with order dated 11.5.2011 vide which his application for impleadment as plaintiff in the suit has been dismissed. Heard. It is apparent from the records that the suit for permanent and mandatory injunction filed by respondent No.3 is pending wherein it is alleged that respondent No.1 has constructed a Chajja illegally and unauthorizedly over the public land belonging to the Nagar Parishad- respondent No.2. The houses of plaintiff and defendant No.1 are opposite to each other and the Chajja is allegedly constructed in front of the house of the plaintiff, while the house of the petitioner is adjacent to the house of defendant No.1. In this view of the matter, it was rightly held that applicant is not a proper and necessary party in whose absence the suit cannot be properly and effectively adjudicated upon. There is no illegality or perversity in the impugned order. The revision petition, being without merit, is accordingly dismissed in limine. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE July 29, 2011 Jiten