IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2895 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2895 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2895 OF 2008 IN IN IN APPEAL NO.774 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.774 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.774 OF 2005 IN IN IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2743 OF 2004 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2743 OF 2004 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2743 OF 2004 IN IN IN SUIT NO.2889 OF 2003 SUIT NO.2889 OF 2003 SUIT NO.2889 OF 2003 Lalit Timothy D’Souza .. Appellant Vs. Lorna D’Souza and Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Gaurav Joshi with Mr.Himay Dave and Mr.Luckyraj Indorkar i/by M/s.Hariani & Co. for the Appellant. Mr.M.M.Vashi i/by M/s.M.P.Vashi & Associates for the Respondents. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE : 2nd December, 2008 DATE : 2nd December, 2008 DATE : 2nd December, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Mentioned. Not on board. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant and the learned Counsel for Respondent No.1. The Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are personally present before the Court. 2. The above Appeal No.774/2005 which arose out of an interlocutory order, was disposed of by us by a consent order dated 21st October, 2005. Now we make it clear that all the parties are at liberty to move the learned Single Judge in the pending suit for appropriate reliefs. We also make it explicitly clear that our order dated 21st October, 2005 passed in the above Appeal will not come in the way of any party moving the learned Single Judge. Notice of Motion stands disposed of accordingly. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)