IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.999 of 2009 UMESH SAH Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 8/ 08.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. A relief was earlier given to this petitioner to reduce the period of sentence to the period undergone but some fault play was found on behalf of the petitioner that the period disclosed by him about his remaining in custody was not from 31.03.2009 rather from 12.06.2009. Thereafter, a show cause was issued with a further submission that the fault could be compensated, if petitioner’s release is further after completion of six months which can be taken as the period undergone. Explanation furnished on behalf of the learned counsel for of the petitioner and pairvikar is accepted. They are exempted from the liability. Accordingly, petitioner is directed to release on completion of a period of six months in connection with Complaint Case No. C-2/20 of 2005 (Trial No. 517 of 2007). Accordingly, the revision application is disposed of. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)