1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Third day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms. Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12732 of 2011 RAMASAMY ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VELAYUTHAMPALAYAM POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT. CRIME NO.283 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. D.RAGHU Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 354, 355 and 506(i) I.P.C., in Crime No.283 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that A1, A3 and A4 have already been arrested and enlarged on bail and hence, he prays for an anticipatory bail. 3. Refuting the same, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner is arrayed is A2 and the overt act against the petitioner is that he assaulted the defacto complainant with sepal and abused her with filthy language. He further submitted that in the alleged occurrence, three persons were sustained injuries and they have already been discharged from the hospital. He further submitted that the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and and also considering the fact that the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 06.09.2011 and in the alleged occurrence, three persons were sustained injuries and they have already been discharged from the hospital and A1, A3 and A4 have already been enlarged on bail and even though, the petitioner was not arrested, neither he interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Karur and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 23/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, KARUR. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KARUR. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VELAYUTHAMPALAYAM POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. J.SENTHIL KUMARAIAH Advocate SR. No.32881 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12732 of 2011 Date :23/09/2011 RJ/29.9.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/