IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15921 of 2009 SHEO PUJAN RAI S/O LATE BADRI RAI R/O VILL CHAWARY, P.S.KOCHAS, DISTT- ROHTAS…..PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION ROHTAS , SASARAM 3. SHEO MUNY SINGH S/O LATE BAHSROPAN SINGH R/O VILL SIRISIYAN , P.S. KARHAGAR, DISTT- ROHTAS, EX- PRINCIPAL OF RAJKIYA MIDDLE SCHOOL BALTHARY(CHAWARY), P.S.KOCHAS, DISTT-ROHTAS 4. BIPIN KUMAR SINGH S/O SHEO MUNY SINGH R/O VILL SIRISIYAN, P.S. KARHAGAR, DISTT- ROHTAS 5. LALLAN PRASAD SINGH S/O LATE RAMADHAR SINGH R/O VILL SANHAUTY, P.S. DINARA, DISTT- ROHTAS, PRESENTLY ASSISTANT TEACHER OF RAJKIYA MIDDLE SCHOOL BALTHARY(CHAWARY), P.S. KOCHAS, DISTT- ROHTAS 6. LAXMAN SINGH S/O RAM RAJ SINGH R/O VILL KOCHAS, P.S. KOCHAS, DISTT- ROHTAS, (EX- ASSISTANT TEACHER) OF RAJKIYA MIDDLE SCHOOL BALTHARY(CHAWARY), P.S. KOCHAS, DISTT- ROHTAS 7. RANA SHANKAR CHAUBEY S/O LATE RAGHUNAND CHOUBEY R/O VILL SEMARIYA, P.S. KOCHAS, DISTT- ROHTAS, (EX- ASSISTANT TEACHER)OF RAJKIYA MIDDLE SCHOOL BALTHARY(CHAWARY), P.S. KOCHAS, DISTT- ROHTAS……………………………RESPONDENTS For the petitioner : Mr. Satish Kr. Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Subhash Pd. Singh, GA-8 ----------- 03/ 19.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The claim of the petitioner is that he was the Secretary of Vidyalaya Shiksha Samiti of village Chawary in the district of Rohtas and the Samiti had raised objection with regard to the illegalities committed by Sri Sheo Muny Singh, the Principal Middle School, Balthari (Chawary), who had also committed financial irregularities with respect to the fund of the school and the payment of salaries. Learned counsel for the - 2 - petitioner submits that considering the grievance of the Samiti constituted under the provision of law, the District Superintendent of Education, Rohtas directed an enquiry to be held by the Area Education Officer, Sasaram vide letter no.2401 of 2008 dated 20.09.2008. The grievance of the petitioner is that in spite of the aforesaid fact neither any enquiry has been held nor the authorities concerned are taking any step with respect to the aforesaid matter and the illegalities are continuing, despite the fact that the petitioner has raised the matter before the District Superintendent of Education, Rohtas and other higher authorities again and again. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of this case, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Superintendent of Education, Rohtas to consider the representation of the petitioner which he must file within fifteen days from today before the said authority along with a copy of this order and thereafter take necessary action in this regard, if not yet taken, expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Harish (S.N. Hussain, J.)