1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2523 OF 2009 ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s | orders orders | ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Mr. K.M. Nagarkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for the respondents. CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, AND S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 11TH FEBRUARY, 2010 Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. In view of the finding of facts recorded by the Tribunal in particular Para. 5 of the decision, the conclusion reached is inevitable. The benefit of G.R. dated 08­06­1995 is available only to the post of regular Driver and not to a person who was appointed on the post of Peon. Especially, the petitioner was appointed on the post of Peon upto 2 08­06­1995. His appointment on the post of regular Driver is from 08­06­1995. In that context, the Tribunal observed that the petitioner would be entitled for benefit under G.R. dated 08­06­1995 on completion of 12 years from that date. No fault can be found with the said opinion of the Tribunal. 3. The petition is dismissed. ( S.S. SHINDE, J. ) (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J.) sut/FEB10/wp2523.09