IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.42 of 2008 SHEOBODHAN KUMAR & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the Appellant : Mr. Binod Prasad Singh For the Respondents 1 to 3: Mr. S. B. Kumar, S.C. XVI ------------ P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ------------ Dated, the 25th July, 2008. We heard counsel for the appellants. 2. The Single Judge in the impugned order has observed thus: “I see substance in the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner and, accordingly, direct the State Respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for regularization in the light of the circular of the State Government itself bearing memo No. 639 dated 16.3.2006. Annexure-A to the supplementary counter affidavit after verifying the period of their engagement from the log books maintained in the different offices where the petitioners have served as Casual Drivers. Necessary consideration in the light of this order be made as early as possible, in any case within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. In this connection, I would like to invite the attention of the authorities to the circular of the earlier Chief Secretary dated 23.8.2004, Annexure-X to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Finance Department of the State Government, duly affirmed on 08.08.2006, whereunder the ban imposed on the appointment of the Class III and IV employees by the State of Bihar was vacated. For arrears of wages also the petitioners are at liberty to represent before the District Magistrate concerned and he shall pass appropriate orders after verifying the log books and other relevant documents. - 2 - 3. We fail to fathom any reason for the appellants to assail the aforesaid order in appeal. The order of the Single Judge, as a matter of fact, grants relief to the petitioners. No further order of any sort, as is canvassed by the counsel for the appellant, is capable of being granted in the fact situation of the present case. 4. The Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed in limine. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J AMIN/-