IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.20 of 2011 RAMESH KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02. 28.03.2011. The whole approach of the Stamp Report appears misplaced on account of construing the wrong provision ignoring the correct provision. The wrong provision was Section 378(4)of the Cr.P.C. which was being referred to by the Stamp Reporter of the Court, so as to getting the memo of appeal presented in the office of this Court converted into S.L.A. Memo of appeal was rightly presented under Section 372 of the Cr.P.C. which does not require any Special Leave Application to be preceded or accompanied with the memo of appeal presented under that particular provision of law, i.e., Section 372 of the Cr.P.C on account of being amended by addition of a proviso to the ancient draft. The reasoning is very simple as may appear from the draft of Section 372 Cr.P.C. An appeal against acquittal of an accused for a charge under Section 302 of the IPC must be heard by a Division Bench of this Court, the S.L.A. is directed to be 2 registered under the proper heading of Criminal Appeals under Section 372 under which it was originally filed so that it could be listed before the appropriate Division Bench. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)