INJ'HEiiIGH_COURT 01'' JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATnSGARH WRIT PETITION N0. 6G I /2004 ^.^pl ^ PETITIONER .1. R.K.Tiwari S/o. Late Shri Ramkripal Tiwari, Sub Divisional Officer (Forest), Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh VERSUS : 2. Srat. Kalpana Tiwari, W/o. Shri R.K.Tiwari, Assistant Comraissioner Comraercial Tax, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh RESPONDENTS : 1 DKS Bhawan Mantralaya, District - Raipur, 2. :3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Department of Forest, Chhattisgarh. Secretary, Department of Commercial Tax, Government of Chhattisgarh, DKS Bhawan Mantralaya, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Government of Chhattisgarh, Jail Road, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. / . ..K^ .A^/^^' /c\^y ..^•:s^"~ ....-•%^''.-----" ^^'^'"-:--""' <s ^' ^ ,<» L-- r XI-HC-22 311^1 ^ii [((•ti'ti 3^t ^g?f»<:ti?a M^^ V--'-' •ss^iNRi^^tatis,ftwi*fy ^^.../^...S^.^ MO^ ' Ict'bt^' WWtl St»11°B 311^1 TOIBR^rfSCT <bl<l[ci<il-< HWfff? [s'&l'.fa^K ^T ari^pT-sn^CT 08.03.2004 Dr. N.K. Shukla, Seilior Couasel with Shri Sfaailendra Shiikla,couxiscl for tfae pcti.ti4>ncrs. - Sbri BIlaskar Pyasi, Pafyel Lawyer for the State. The petitionei-s have IprefeiTed flus writ petition mider \ Article 226/227 offhe Consti^ution of Indiachallenging fhe order- dated 24.02.2004 (Aiuiexi|ire P-1) passed by the State Oovcraincat zvbercby thc pcti^ioncr No, 1 who was workiag as Sub Dn'isional Officer (Forestj, R^jnaagaon has been transferred to Daatewada aad it has been ^neged fhat tlie toipugned ord.er is arbitrary, urucasonable aad u(ijust. Leamed couiiael for the petitioners subiuits thatiafhe year 1998 thc Pctitioncr No.l wa^ postcd as Sub Divisional Officcr (Forest), BUaspur aad fhe Peti^ioner No.2 who is wife of Petitioner ,No,l at the releyant tirne w4s workiug at Raipiir, therefore, a request was inade by petition^r ao-2 to post her at Bilaspur so that sbe inav reaiain with ter liusband i.e. Petitioner No,l. Accordiugly, lier requcst was| acccptcd and sttc was posted at Bflaspur. However, in the y^ar 2000 ttie Petitioncr No. 1 was again transferred to Rajaaudfeaon against which the Petitioner No.l ha^tnade a repiEgeatalio^i but the same was not considered by the respondents. NOW ag^iin the Pelitioner No. 1 lias tieen ta'emsferrcd froin Rajnaadga^n to Dautcwada whereas fhc Petitioner No.2 i.e. the wife of ie Petitioner No. 1 is still worKmi at Bilaspur and the distance bi^tween Bilaspur & Rajnandgaoii is about 500 kiloiueters, therefor^, it has becoiae difficult for tUem. XI-HC-22 SlA^W ftii+snit^i' ^b-iT^^ff&tl •<\^ •TS?-sip)RTq,;sg&I%P«lwy ^ ^n^ •9^ ^ WWII Sh*<l<n ^.....^fz/.^4......-..-.^ 20(1 sn^r^awaiN ''U ^widdl-i HiHci!-? fe(<3 <fa^i< ^?3»pOT3ii^r to Biaintain Uieir lamily and cl^ildrea wlio are sjmaU. Agsunst the impugned order both the petit^oiiers have inade a represeatatioii to the effect that thcy have nt( liking for ahy particular place of 1. . -_.._ .- I .! - ^ ~. .. . ~._ :.. postmg iu ,the State of C.G., tti^ir only request is ttiat ftiey sbould be posted at one place. L-eafae|l couiisel further submits that £he respondents xaay be directed f|3 decide the representation of the petitioners; to wluch learaed St^te couasel has no objectioii. Lcamed cozuisel for thc I|utervcncr Shri A, Mislu-a, subnuts that ffae mtervener- S.S. Na|ndeo who lias been posted at Rajnandgaon ia place of tlie Petitioner No. 1 has already assumed fbe charge ofSub Divisional Oflpicer (Forest), Rajnangaon. Haviag heard the learuhd counsel for the parties and haviag regEiid to/thc facts an<|l circuinstanccs of fhc case, thc respondents are dirccted to ^ecide fhe representation of fhe petitioners in accordance wifh ^ raised by tlie petitioners iu aa order wifhin a period of two wee] aw considering ail the grievances ffbjective inaaner wifh. .a reasoned ES. With the aforcsald dirc^tion, thc writ pctition stands disposed o£ ' | Consequenay, M.W.P. No.j staad disposed of. Certified copv as per Rules 388/2004 & I.A. No. 1454/04 also Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge r 3ali •;-v,':1^j >,"BI 'k.