HI^C^RT.OFX.LHHATTISGARHATBIL^^ DIV1S1CWLB6NCU sa. ussa 'BLE SHRI 'BLE SHRI RAJEEVeUPTA.CJ. RANGNATH CHANDR State of Chhattisgarh ^ Ramchsnt Ut Police District Sarguja (CG) Versus )lu @ Krishna Prasad Yadav, S/o Lailu Prassd Yadav, aged about 23 years, R/o Kalikapuri, PS Ramchandrapur, DistS Sarguja (CG) ABDlication for arant of leaveto appeal Present : Shri Akhil Mishra, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the State (12th Ju!y, 2010) order of the Court was passed by This matter is listed today for orders on the petitioner's default of not fliing delay in filing the p 2) Tt\e an appropriate application for condonation of the petition under Section 378(3) ofthe Cr.P.C. fited by the petitioner/State under Section 378(3) of the Cr.P.C., on 20.02.2006 fbr grant of teave to appeal against the acqulttal of respondent / accused Bablu @ Krishna Prasad Yadav vide impugned judgment dated 31.08.2005 is reported to be time barred by as many ss 83 days. li. 2 3) No application for condonation of the delay in flling the under Section 378(3) of Cr.P.C., was fited along with the In fact, no such application has been filed tiSI date though a of more than 4 years has eiapsed since the fiting of the under Section 378(3) of Cr.P.C., on 20.02.2006. -•'-^ 5) tn this vlew of the matter, we do not find any Justification in the prayer of learned Deputy Govemment Adva;ate for grant of 6) The above prayer of learned Deputy Govemment Advocate, , is rej As the less sufficient has falled in showlng any cause, cause for the delay in filing the petition under of Cr.P.C., we are left with no other option, but to dismiss She petitlon as barred by time. 8) The petition flled by the petitionsr / State under Sectlon 378(3) of Cr.PC., therefore, is dismissed as 'time-barred'. Sd/- Chief Justice padma Sd/- R-N.Chandrakar Judge