1 wp1839.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1839 OF 2011 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. S.P. Urgunde, advocate for the petitioner. 1. Heard Advocate Mr. Urgunde for petitioner. He contends that the document at Exhibit-51/2 was pleaded in paragraph no.7 of the written statement and to show the nature of relationship, that document was essential and ought to have been exhibited. According to him the reason given by trial Court for its rejection is incorrect. He expressly restricts challenge in writ petition only to said document. 2. Perusal of impugned order reveals that the letter is claimed to have been sent by R.P.A.D. and that R.P.A.D. is at Exhibit-53 on record of the trial Court. Learned Counsel has clarified that R.P.A.D. is postal receipt. Trial Court has found that the letter at Exhibit-51/2 is original and there is no proof of its receipt by the police authorities. Therefore, it has not given any exhibit number to it at that stage. The finding that it is original, has not 2 wp1839.11 been disputed before this Court. 3. In this situation, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter at this stage. Petition is rejected. No costs. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE. 17.03.2011 gas/wp1839.11