1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1817 OF 1997 Mohan Dagadu Kawade. ..... Petitioner. Versus Kolhapur Municipal Corporation & Ors. ... Respondents. None present for the Petitioner. Mr. S. S. Patwardhan for Respondent No.2. Mr. S. R. Nargolkar, AGP for the State. CORAM: BILAL NAZKI and MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED : 8TH JUNE, 2009. P. C.: One lawyer appeared for the petitioner in the morning and sought pass over. The matter was taken over after break but nobody appears for the petitioner. 2. We have perused the papers and heard learned Counsel appearing for the Government and also for the Corporation. 3. The petitioner is basically aggrieved of an order of suspension pending the case under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Learned Counsel for the Corporation, on instructions, submits that the petitioner was placed under suspension when he was prosecuted under the Prevention of 2 Corruption Act. But after his acquittal, he was taken back in service on 20th July, 2007 and the suspension order stood revoked and in these circumstances this writ petition appears to have become infructuous. 4. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.)