1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6880/2008 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.12536/2008 Smt. Seema Parveen Yusuf and another ...Versus... Santosh Ramnarayan Tiwari and others ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri B.D. Vora, Adv. for applicants] [Ms Anita Singh, Adv for respdt. No.3] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 28.04.2009 Heard learned Counsel for applicants and learned Counsel for respondent No.3. Other respondents though served are absent. There is delay of 25 days in filing first appeal. Learned Counsel for respondent No.3 has serious objection on the ground that there are no good and sufficient reasons provided in the application for condoning the delay. Heard learned Counsel for the rival parties and I find that in paragraph Nos.3 and 4 of the application reasons are furnished by the applicants. Delay is not much. Hence, civil application is allowed in terms of its prayer clause. Appeal be registered. JUDGE ssw