FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5603 OF 2011 "Avinash Marutirao Naikwade and another Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr.M.S. Karad, Advocate h/f. Mr. S.S. Thombre, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.T. Shelke, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. V.D. Rakh, AGP for respondent No.1. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE :- 28TH NOVEMBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Any interference at this stage would amount to stalling the election process, which is not permissible in view of the judgment of the Apex Court, in the matter of " Election Commission of India Vs. Ashok Kumar" reported in AIR 2000 SC 2979. Interference in such matters would be permissible only in the event a fraud on the constitution or on the statute is established by the party concerned. Reliance in this case an be made to the judgment of the Apex Court in the matter of " K. Venkatchalla Vs. State of Tamil Nadu" reported in AIR 1999 SC 172. Hence, the writ petitions is rejected. [A.V. POTDAR,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-