IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 18TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 16009 of 2011(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- R.G.ANOOP, S/O V.RAJENDRAN PILLAI, AGED 30 YEARS, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, ESWARA VILASAM HIGH SCHOOL, NEDUVATHOOR, P.O.NEELESWARAM, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.E.HAMZA SRI.T.V.VIJAYARAJAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM – 695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, TRIVANDRUM-14. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAMD DISTRICT. 5. THE MANAGER, ESWARA VILASAM HIGH SCHOOL, NEDUVATHOOR, P.O.NEELESWARAM, KOTTARAKKARA. BY SR.GOVT.PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE FOR R1 TO R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN WPC.16009/11 PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1: COPY OF ORDER NO.B2/343/09 OF DIST.EDUCATIONAL OFFICER DT.19.2.10. EXT.P2: COPY OF GO(MS)NO.125/2001/G.EDN. OF THE GOVERNMENT DT.2.4.2001. EXT.P3: COPY OF JUDGMENT OF THIS COURT IN O.P.NO.35436/02 DT.3.2.10. EXT.P4: COPY OF DECISION REPORTED IN 2007(1) klt 766 DT.18.10.06. EXT.P5: COPY OF DECISION REPORTED IN 2008(2) klt 771(SC). EXT.P6: COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC.7207/05. EXT.P7: COY OF ORDER NO.16895/A3/2-1/G.EDN. OF THE GOVERNMENT DT.31.3.11. EXT.P8: COPY OF ORDER OF APPOINTMENT OF SHRI SHINE DT.1.6.09. EXT.P9: COPY OF ORDER NO.ET(1)/53568/2010/DPI/K.DIS. OF THE DIRECTOR DT.9.9.10. EXT.P10: COPY OF ORDER NO.3001/L2/11/G.EDN. OF THE GOVERNMENT DT.17.3.11. EXT.P11: COPY OF ORDER OF APPOINTMENT OF THE PETITIONER DT.1.6.09. EXT.P12: COPY OF REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT. RESPONDENTS' EXTS: NIL TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE dsn T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.16009 of 2011 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 9th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2011 JUDGMENT The Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner aggrieved by Exhibit P10 order passed by the Government stating that there is no vacancy to provide the petitioner. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. 3. A copy of the revision petition, on which Exhibit P10 order is passed, has been produced by the petitioner as Exhibit P12. A reading of Exhibit P12 shows that the petitioner had raised various points therein. 4. Exhibit P10 shows that it is issued is in the form of a letter and it is not a reasoned one. Apart from that the learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the petitioner was not heard before the revision petition was rejected as per Exhibit P10. 5. In that view of the matter Exhibit P10 is quashed. There will be a direction to the Government to pass a fresh order W.P.(C)No.16009/11 -2- on Exhibit P12 revision petition after hearing the petitioner and the Manager within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. SD/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn