SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.686 OF 2009 Nanu G. Mithari ...Applicant. v. The M.C.G.M. And Ors. ...Respondents. Ms Radhika Samant i/by Shri D.M.Shah, advs. For the Applicant. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 8, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. Respondent no. 2 is present in person. Applicant filed Suit No.1062 of 2009 challenging the notice under Section 351 issued by the respondent no.1 Municipal Corporation for demolition of unauthorised structure. Respondent Nos.2 to 12 are the only original landlords and they filed chamber summons no. 238 of 2009 for impleading them as party. That chamber summons was allowed by the impugned order dated 2.9.2009. That order is challenged by the original plaintiff. As the notice pertains to unauthorised structure, which is subject matter of the tenancy, landlords can not be deprived of their rights to contest the suit. Therefore, I do not see any illegality or - 2 - irregularity in the impugned order allowing the landlords to be impleaded as parties. Therefore, the revision application stands rejected. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)