IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH JULY 2008 / 26TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 21568 of 2008(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- V.G.RADHAMONY, VELIYIL HOUSE, THURAVOOR SOUTH P.O. ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.K.G.UNNIKRISHNAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION QUILON. 2. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 4. VIDHYADHARAN SANTHI, NADUVILAKAM, WEST KALLADA P.O.,KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY SRI.J. PRABHAKARAN – SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.21568 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner obtained a decree for payment of money against the 4th respondent. Since the 4th respondent did not pay the money, the petitioner took out execution proceedings in which, the Civil Court directed respondents 1 to 3 to deduct amount from the salary of the 4th respondent and to deposit it with the Court. The petitioner now submits that respondents 1 to 3 deducted and paid the amount till November 2007 and thereafter failed to pay the same. It is under the above circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs: “(i) To issue a Writ a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to make payment of the amount recovered from the 4 th respondent. (ii) To issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to recover the amount due to the petitioner from the 4 th respondent to the satisfaction of the decree from the amount due to the 4 th respondent.” W.P./(c)No.21568/08 2 I am of opinion that the petitioner's remedy lies in approaching the Civil Court itself, wherein the execution petition is pending, seeking appropriate relief. Therefore, without prejudice to such right, this writ petition is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd W.P./(c)No.21568/08 3