IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(s;)No. HL’I9é /2009 u W PETITIONER : Akhil Kumar Tiwari S / o.Ram Narayan Tiwari, Aged About 34 ;; Years, R/o Village Navagaon, Post Narayanpur, Block Navagarh, District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretaly, Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.)K 2. The District Education Officer Durg, District Durg (C.G.) The Block Education Officer, Block Navagarh, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. . 14 " ,vifh E§a=mamEL§RmWE; Emm@I wewqw 1E 200 7 mmmfaw> 20.8.2009 Shri V.Rathore, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vivek Sharma, P.L. for the State. Contention of the petitio .~ is that his, case is squarely ’ covered with the decision of the upreme Court and also various orders passed by this Court in ide tical matters. 1 r Counsel for the petitioner t this stage, wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to file representation before the respondent No. 1. He further sub its that direction may be issued for deciding the representatio so made by the petitioner, expeditiousiy. Counsel for the State sub its that at this stage he is not in a position to make any stateme t as to whether the case of the petitioner is covered by the ord passed in the aforementioned identical writ petition. He howe r submits that let the petition make a representation to the repondent No. 1 which would be decided strictly in accordance wit law. Accordingly, the petition is ismissed as withdrawn with the .1 liberty as aforesaid. in the entuatity of filing any such representation by the petitioner w hin a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of t is order, the same is expected to be decided within a period of thre months. . ,xr//Sd/_ Diwaker ‘13 j “,0 Pritinker V» y' Judge 6/ l