IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No.7687 of 2011 Date of Decision:3.8.2011 Balak Ram .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Ashok Khubbar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.S. Kundu, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Deepak Jindal, D.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the relief claimed in the present writ petition has already been granted. Therefore, the present petition may be dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 3.8.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE