IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1459 of 2010 Date of Decision: 30.7.2010 Ganga Vishnu and another .....Petitioners Versus Harmel Singh and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Parveen Kumar Rohilla, Advocate, for the petitioners. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) Vide order dated 25.6.2010 this Court has directed that the petitioners shall not be replaced by similar temporary arrangement. However, learned counsel for the petitioners could not point out that any other person has been engaged on contract basis in place of the petitioners. In view of the said fact, it cannot be said that the order passed by this Court has been violated. I do not find that any case for initiation of the contempt proceedings is made out. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. [HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 30.7.2010 ds