IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.668 of 2009 SMT.VIDYA KUMARI @ VIDYA DEVI, W/O SHRI AKHLESHWAR SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-MURGAWAN, P.S.-SILAO, DISTRICT- NALANDA, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 108, NEELGIRI APARTMENT, BORING CANAL ROAD, PATNA. …………PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER. Versus 1. KANHAIYAJEE @ DAYANAND GOSWAMI, ALLEGED SON OF LATE KAMESHWAR PRASAD SINGH. 2. SMT. KIRAN SHARMA, W/O ALLEGED KANHAIYAJEE. BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-MURGAWAN, P.S.-SILAO, DISTRICT-NALANDA AT BIHARSHARIFF. ……………DEFENDANTS/OPPOSITE PARTIES. FOR THE PETITIONER: MR. S.S. SINHA ‘SHYAM’, ADV. MR. K.K. SINHA, ADV. ----------- 2 29.04.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that plaintiff was leading evidence on day to day basis. On 17.3.2009 time petition was pressed but the same was rejected and the evidence of the plaintiff was closed in view of the earlier order dated 24.2.2009 by which the plaintiff was directed to produce evidence on day to day basis. He further submits that plaintiff now undertakes to produce her witness within four days in continuation. In case she fails to do that her evidence may be closed for which she will not raise any grievance before any court. In the circumstances, in the interest of justice the order dated 17.3.2009 is set aside and the learned court below is directed to permit the plaintiff to produce her evidence within four days in continuation. In case, on - 2 - any date plaintiff defaults the court below will be at liberty to close the evidence. With above directions, the revision application is disposed of. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)