{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10586 OF 2010 Digambar s/o Hullappa Sangnale Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.S.B.Chavan, advocate for petitioner Mrs.A.V.Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for respondents no.1 & 2. Mr.S.T.Shelke, advocate for Respondent No.3. CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND R.M.BORDE, JJ. DATE : 22 nd November, 2010 PER COURT: 1 The petitioner basically challenges the election of Respondent No.4. 2 An alternate efficacious remedy is available to the petitioner by filing an Election Petition under the Bombay Village Panchayats Act. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to interfere in the petition. 3 Writ Petition is, therefore, rejected relegating the petitioner to the alternate remedy available to him in law. R.M.BORDE B.R.GAVAI JUDGE JUDGE adb/wp1058610