^' IN THE HIGH COURT OF_CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.4'-^'^ OF 2007 PETITIONER \ ^^k^ ?..^\^% ^••^^ ^' ^y^- \>!" ' ?' ^•••••" RESPONDENTS .'^-> ^^[^1^K-S'B' ; ^' ' -<-(,NSV'UE2. f Collector, .••• Mithilesh Kumar Pandey S/o Shri Keshav Prasad Pandey Aged about 42 years R/o 266,Sundar Nagar Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary Department of Revenue D^.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Distt. Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^s^ ^^'\ f&?^. 1 '-%;'\..—^.^.\ .^ ^ • '^ // ».. y s "%^sy 'wl^riN) <*(1^?1 a**ffq> ^.J, '\-: ^- '3'E? '<)i<ny <?,. ®-nl*i) id, fqoi<i^< wn a»*<i<i> sn^r T5W (v^i<^) wiiw^ite 3(i^i {Slnole Bench; Hon'ble Mrl Writ Petitim) U (Petition under Art.226| PEnnONBR : Mithileslt Pandey, Nagar^ R^ of Constitution of Indid) Kumor Pandey, S/o Shri Keshav Prasad Aged about 42 years, ft/o 266, Sundar itpur (CS) ftESPONDENTS Versus 1. State ofl &epart'met 2. Collector. agtiinst 29.0t.2009 Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, Advo< Mr. Y.S. Thakur, C>y. Advoc^te Heard. This petition is directed ag{iini cbted 29.6.2007 (Annewre P-2] working as Patwarj ond posted at been tronsferred to Potwari l-1cll Raipuron •riieadministratiye grour Lear-ned counsel for the tnmsfer order cpuld not Be giyenj quo ctated 13.8.2007 passed by -ttii Mr. Thakur, leamed Deputvj atso submits that by yirtue of +l<licl<ft-< *114d'f tf IS^t llalt<l< ^rsrRCTSiiSw Jystice &hirendni Mishm) 1 hto.4636/2007 Chhattisaarh, Through: the Secretary, it of Revenue, &.K.S. Bhanwon, Raipur (€6}. Oistt. Raiour (C.G.) ate forthe petitioner. ©eneralfor the Stdte. the impugned transfer order whereby the petitioner, who is 'atwari Halka No.1095, Raipur, has Ika No.30, Snriyabariclh, District Id. . . -- " ^titioner submits that impugned leffect to due to order of status b Court. Adyocate Seneral for the $tate quo order dated 13.(®.07of stttus ^t^ g?urr^r CT^TI^Ira—FS/95—11 /2008—i,00,000. w' ^L ~3"ar^Wn?PT;~®^tWf?,f6«li'M'i< »winitn*ii«n an^r 'qa^R' (1pf3^t?) sn^i^Rifriw i3n^?T"ai^N> TRIIW^ftasiT^I z ••^200 •fiiiifi'ji-i *<i*<<'if'? ft^ <r»it4i< ^i SlfiPI 311^1 •rtiis Court, the impugned trwisf^r or<ter of Annexure P-2, so far as jt retates to the petitioner, coujld not be giveneffect to till date and in these circumstnnces, th^ transfer order of Annexur®P-2 dated 29.6.2007 has becoine nleaninqless & redundant with the lapse of tiine. He further subnii^s 1hat he has no objection if •the petition is allowed ond iinpuaned ^-ransfer order of Annexure P-2 is set aside with liberty to the S^ate to pass appropriate orders in Ihe niatter of transfer of petitio^ier under adininistrative ewgency. In view ofabQve submissioit of leamect counsel for the State, the instant petition is allowed wJfi the impuaned transfer order of Armewre P-2 dated 29.6.2007 , so far as it rehtes to 1+ie petitioner hereiri, is hereby set c|side. However, the State diall be at liberty to poss oppropriate ord^rs with reoard to transfier of the petitioner in the event of adniinistnxtiye a^igency. Consequently, I.A. No.l, ^pplication for gront of intet-im relief also stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rutes. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge wiRa'[i Tgsi'n»T(R:ii<?ri?—FS/9S—11/2008—1,00,000.