E3§?§?EQMER HEGH CGURT OF CHHA‘F'FESG£&RH A? BELA$PUR DNiSlON BENCH {EGRNVR HQN‘ELE SHRE RAJEEV GLfPT&, CJ. 8c HGN’BLE SHRK SUNIL KHMAR SINHA, J: M.€3.C. N634? a? 2%4 Radheshyam Diwakar, Son 0f Angordas Diwakar, Aged about 34 years, Black Education Officer, Kota, Resident of Durga Chowk. Jabdapara, Sarkanda, Tswn, Tahsil & Distréct Biiaspur (Chhattésgam) vast/as L The State of Chhattisgarh, Thmugh the Secretary, School Educatien Department, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, D.K.$. Bhawan, Man‘traiaya, Raipun Chhattisgarh. 2. The Director, Public instruction Government of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhaitisgam. 3i The Joint Secreiary, Schooi Educaticm Department. Govt of Chhattisgarh, DKS. B‘nawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur, Chhatiiggaih. 4. The Disirict Educaticn Officer, Gcvemment of Ch‘nattisgarh, Composite Buiiding, Coiiectorate, Town, Tahsii 8: District Biiaspur, C’nhaitisgarh 5. Hamarayan Singh, Son of Shyam Lai, Lecturer, aged abcut 45 years, Resident cf Governmeni Higher Secondary School Lakhram, District Biiaspur. Chhaiiisgar‘n APPLiCATiQN FQR REWEW QF THE QRDER PAS$E§3 ON 12.%4.2$%4 §E$PQNEENT$ :Eresen‘iv : None far the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, ieamed Govt. Advocate for respondent No. i to 4, Shri sanjay K. Agrawai, ieamed counsei for respondent No5 V/s r~ / subbu R) QRDER {4m sepiember, 20am Th9 faiiowing arder of the Court was passed by R34eev Gamay SJ Nona fm the petitioner. 2. As “there is no representation on behaif of the petitioner, we age §efi wiih n0 other optien but to dismiss the petition for want of i , i prosecution. 3. The petition, therefore, is dismissed for want of ”e—(Wkr ptosecotion. ”/1 Sdl- Sdl— ' i Sunii Kumar Sinh'a CHIEF JUSTICE i Judge