IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8058 of 2008 ENAMUL HAQUE Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 14.5.2008. The petitioner who is apprehensive of his arrest in connection with Turkaulia P.S. Case No.115 of 2007 registered under Sections 467/468/419/420/34 I.P.C. has prayed for anticipatory bail. The allegation against the petitioner is that he as Mukhiya in collusion with Panchayat Secretary, Ramadhar Sharma and Iftkhar Alam had got the latter (Iftkhar Alam) appointed as a Panchayat Teacher in the year 2006 on the basis of a forged and fabricated Certificate inasmuch as certificate granted by the Maulvi of Madarsa Board showed his date of birth as 10.2.1983 and he having secured 78.5 marks and the certificate of Intermediate Council submitted by him for appointment as Shiksha Mitra in the year 2005 revealed his date of birth as 10.2.1974 and the marks obtained by him was 398(3rd Division). Efforts to seek clarification from this petitioner evinced no response. Admittedly, Iftkhar Alam had two certificates indicating two dates of birth one of which must be false and fabricated and to secure his employment as a Panchayat Teacher in the year 2006 he had used the certificate allegedly granted by the Maulvi of the Madarsa Board whereas the certificate granted by the Intermediate Council indicated another date of birth. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, I am not - 2 - inclined to extent the benefits of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. P.S. (Abhijit Sinha,J)