IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10326 of 2007 RINKU DEVI @ RINU KUMARI, W/o Sanjiva Choudhary, D/o Maksudan Pandey, Resident of Village-Randaha, P.S.-Rajapakar, District-Vaishali. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, District-Vaishali. 3. The District Welfare Officer, Vaishali, District-Vaishali. 4. The Child Development Project Officer, Vaishali. 5. The Block Development Officer, Rajapakar (Vaishali) 6. The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Bahuara, P.S.-Rajapakar (Vaishali) 7. The Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat Raj Bahuara, P.S.-Rajapakar (Vaishali) 8. Kiran Kumari, W/o Shashi Bhushan Jha, Resident of Village-Randaha, District-Vaishali. ----------- 3 1/12/2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. Counsel for the petitioner with reference to the following relief. "That the present writ application is for issuance of an appropriate writ/writs the nature of Certiorary by quashing the selection of Respondent no. (8) as Anganbari Sevika vide resolution passed by the general body meeting dated 4.6.07 under the Chairmanship of Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Bahuara (Respondent no. 6) and rejected the application of the petitioner accordingly final list has been prepared (As content in annexure4). Further an appropriate writ/writs in the nature of Mandamus be issued directing and commanding the Respondent to concerned Respondent to select/appoint the petitioner as Anganbari Sevika for primary school Randahan east Anganbari Centre. And any other relief be granted to the petitioner for which she is entitled under the law." 2 incourse of his submission has accepted that the representation filed by the petitioner before the Collector of the district before filing of this writ application, did not contain all necessary details inasmuch as, even name of the selected candidate had not been disclosed. He would accordingly seek leave of this Court to file a fresh detailed representation before the Collector of the district. That being so, this court would permit the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Collector of the district, who in terms of the circular of the State Government being the prescribed authority would decide the matter, of course after hearing the petitioner, respondent no. 8 and the representative of the concerned Gram panchayat in question in accordance of law by a reasoned order within a period of six months from the date of filing of such representation by the petitioner. With the aforementioned observation/direction this application is disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar