1 S.B.CRIM.MISC. PETITION NO.944/2004 Hanuman Ram & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan. Date :: 03.07.2006 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr.Shambhoo Singh, for the petitioners. Mr.Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor for State. By the instant criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., petitioners have challenged the order dated 03.07.2004 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bali (for short 'the revisional court') in criminal revision No.31/2003 whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioners against the order framing charges for the offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC dated 15.04.2002 passed by the Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Sumerpur (for short 'the trial court' hereinafter) was dismissed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the orders of revisional court as well as the trial court as also the record and challan papers. The petitioners have already availed one revision. 2 From the perusal of the order of revisional court, it appears that revisional court has taken into account the material placed before the trial court. It cannot be said that the order impugned would result in manifest injustice or abuse of process of Court. No case interference is made out for by invoking inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The criminal misc. petition is, therefore, dismissed. Stay petition also stands dismissed. [H.R. PANWAR],J. Ashwini/-