IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18498 of 2009 DIWAN WAHAJUL KHAN, SON OF DIWANKALAMUDDIN KHAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – NAUGARHA, P.S. CHAINPUR, DISTT. KAIMUR. -------- PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RUKUNIDDIN KHAN, SON OF NABAB KHAN 3. NAVAB KHAN, SON OF LATE AKHATAR KHAN 4. HIBAB JANIB KHAN, SON OF RUKUNUDDIN KHAN 5. LOKMAM KHAN, SON OF DEWAN HESAMUDDIN KHAN 6. DIWAN KAMRAN KHAN 7. DIWAN MUSHAMDDIN KHAN 8. JUGNU KHAN 9. RAKIBU KHAN 10. MASIHUDDIN KHAN ALL SONS OF DEWAN HESAMUDDIN KHAN 11. HESAMUDDIN KHAN, SON OF NABAB KHAN, SON OF HASMUDDIN KHAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAWGARHA, P.S. CHAINPUR, DISTT. KAIMUR. ----------- OPPOSITE PARTIES. 2 21.06.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner who is the Informant is aggrieved with the order dated 24.4.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge Cum F.T.C.-II, Kaimur at Bhabua, in Sessions Trial No. 42/17 of 2009 by which it has discharged the Opposite Parties No. 2 to 11 of the offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Since the Trial Court is the best Judge as to what offence is made out, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)