IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1162 of 2009 MAHENDRA MANDAL son of Deosharan Mandal, resident of village Shahpur, P.S.Ghogha, District Bhagalpur … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Shri Shivesh Chandra Mishra For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta, APP ----------- 2. 12.2.2009 Heard. It is not disputed that the petitioner has also purchased some part of the same plot which has been purchased by the informant. What the complainant had alleged was that having received the copy of the sale deed he could know that the width of the land has been shown only 15 feet. The informant alleged that it was on account of this petitioner that some interpolation was made in his deed and as such the petitioner was demanding Rs. 5,00000/- as ransom for correcting the same, else he threatened to kill him. The contention is that the petitioner had nothing to do with the deed which was executed in favour of the informant and he has wrongly and falsely implicated 2 the petitioner. It was further contended that the allegation of demanding ransom is an addition to heighten the situation. Let the above named petitioner be released on his furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in Kahalgaon P.S.Case No. 222 of 2008. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)