1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.342 OF 1989 Bank of India. ..Plaintiffs. V/s. M/s.Excel Electrical Engineers & Ors. ..Defendants. Mr.Jose George for Plaintiffs. Mr.H.S.S.Murthy for defendant Nos. 4 and 5. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J DATE : APRIL 23, 2008. DATE : APRIL 23, 2008. DATE : APRIL 23, 2008. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. They state that the parties have settled all their dispute and have tendered Consent Terms duly signed by the parties and their respective advocates on record. They state that the the Suit had already been decreed against Defendant Nos.1 to 3 and, therefore, the Consent Terms filed today are, only between the Plaintiffs and Defendant Nos. 4 and 5. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The Suit is decreed in terms of the Consent Terms and disposed of as such. 2. It is open for the parties to apply for return of original documents, if any, filed by them. 2 If such applications are filed, the same may be considered as per the rules. 3. Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this Order. (D.B.BHOSALE,J) (D.B.BHOSALE,J) (D.B.BHOSALE,J)