IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 60 OF 2007 SHRI QUEROBINO MARTINS, PANAJI GOA. ... Petitioner Versus SMT. LINETTE FERNANDES,SALIGAO GOA. ... Respondent Mr. V. A. Lawande, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V. P. Thali, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- S.A. BOBDE, J. Date:- 18th April, 2008 P.C. Having heard the parties fully, it is clear that there is no merit in this writ petition in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in GAYA PRASAD VS. PRADEEP SRIVASTAVA, reported in (2001) 2 SCC 604. Hence, the petition is liable to be dismissed. However, Mr. Lawande, the learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is willing to furnish an undertaking that the petitioner would vacate the premises by 30th April, 2009. Therefore, on the petitioner filing an undertaking to the effect that he would vacate the premises by 30th April, 2009, within a period of two weeks from today, the respondent shall not execute the decree till 30th April, 2009. 2. In addition to the above, the order shall operate on the following conditions : (i) The petitioner shall not create any third party right in the premises. He shall also furnish an undertaking to that effect of all other adult family members. (ii) He shall continue to pay the rents at the agreed rate, till 30th April, 2009. (iii) He shall pay rents of March and April, 2009, in advance, in the month of February, 2009. Writ petition disposed of. S.A. BOBDE, J. ssm.