IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 1198 of 2010 Date of decision: 3.3.2010 Amrik Singh Petitioner vs. State of Punjab Respondent Present: Mr. Rajesh Bhatheja, Advocate. Mr. Arshvinder Singh, DAG, Pb Mr. Tarunvir Vashisht, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case, registered at the instance of Karam Singh alleging that his share of land has been sold by Roop singh by producing some impersonator before Sub Registrar, Tehsil Complex, Patiala. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner is neither beneficiary nor he is an attesting witness but has been falsely implicated in the case. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the police file. During the course of investigation, Roop Singh has made a confessional statement to the effect that petitioner Amrik Singh, his nephew, has played the entire trick and had taken Roop Singh to Patiala, where the act of impersonation and transfer of property had taken place. He is the one who had taken a sum of Rs. 1.00 lac from Roop Singh for the purpose of fraudulent transfer . The case is at initial stage. It appears to be a case of custodial interrogation. No extra ordinary exceptional circumstances exist for the grant of pre-arrest bail. Dismissed. March 3 ,2010 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE