^ o'^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR MCC No.261/2010 PETITIONER Badri Narayan Goverdhan Das, Proprietorship concern, through Proprietor Shri Kailash Chand Agrawal, S/o Goverdhandas Agarwal, R/o Raipur RESPQNDENTS Versus 1 State of Madhya Pradesh (Now C.G.) Through Awar Sachiv Local Self Government State of M.P. (Now C.G.) Bhopal (Now Raipur) 2 Commissioner, Municlpal Corporation, Raipur APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION Appearance : Mr. Bhaskar Payasi, Counsel for the petitioner. Mrs. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.1. Mr. H.B. Agarwal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Pragya Singh, Counsel for respondent No.2. ORAL ORDER (05.05.2010) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard. The petitioner-concern has filed this petition for restoration of W.P. N0.2942//1992, which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 31.03.2010. The ground taken in the restoration application is that the Clerk of the petitioner's counsel could not mark the listing of the case on 31.03.2010, therefore, nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner, whenthe matter was taken for hearing on the said date. R==ff /^ . MCC No.261/2010 On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the grounds taken in the restoration application, I am satisfied that the absence of learned counsel for the petitioner on 31.03.2010, when W.P. No.2942/1992 was taken up for hearing, was based on bonafide grounds. Accordingly, MCC No.261/2010 is allowed and W.P. No.2942/1992 is restored to its original number. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge