Writ PeUtei <S\ No. 633 of20(» PeBtioner Vereus Res{»rKtents 1 3. 4. Ramnarayan Tharari, ag«l about 53 yews, Qo Late Shri Sutyanarayan Thwari, A^istant Teacher Gowmment Girts Higher Secondary Schpol, Kota, Block-K^a, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Throwh Secretary, School EducaCon Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur <C-G-) The Dlrector Publte Ins&ucUon DepartinentRaipur(C^J Dish'ictEducationOfficerBUaspur(C.G.) Btock EdUGatton Officer Kota, District- Bilaspw(CX3^ WRn- PETITOIN UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE GONStn'yflON OF IMDIA Singte Bench : Hon'ble Mr.Satish K. Agnihofrl, J. ^^ Shri Dhlrendra ^Ushra.Advocateforlhe petttioner. Shri AtokBatehi, Gbvt. AdvocdeforttierespOndents. GfftALORDER (Passed onthis 2tfhdayof February,2008) The p^Boner was appointal initiaNy, ori a fixed pay o( Rs. 15<y-. The p^tionerwas thereafter, granted regular pay scate on completion of the probafion pertod. The que^ion of tew involved her^n is, asto whether the petittoner is entitted to regular pay scate w.e.f. ttie date of inftial appoinbnent or from ttie date of completlon ofprobaflon period. Leamed counsel appearing for the p^ifioner, as well as teamed counsel appearing for Itie respondents/Stete, jointly subndt thrt jhe facts and quesdon of law, invohred inthe presentwrit petBon, are the same a^o ttiat of !n W.P.(S)No. 813/2007 (RamKunrarSahM& <^ere ^fe. State Govt. of Chhaffisgarh & an<rther)^whteh was allowed vide ordw cteted 122.2007. -In view of Uie above-^ated submisstons made by teamed counsel appearingiorthe partj^.they^it pefi )n Is aNowed Inthe sam&temra i.e. p^ffioner is entffled (or regplaF pay scate w the date of uiifiat appoinhnent, suyetAto veritK^ionofBie fads.No onterasto costs. :Riakur ./ Sdf- -• / SatisbK. Agnihotri ^s^. Judge