IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-34504 of 2009 Date of Decision:13.1.2010 Bagga Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Gurnam Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. As per the FIR, 30 kgs of poppy husk was recovered from the present petitioner, which is non commercial quantity. It is stated that subsequently on the disclosure statement, another 70 kgs of poppy husk was recovered from the house of the petitioner. It is admitted that 'the FIR', 'disclosure statement' and the 'subsequent alleged recovery effected from the petitioner' are of the same day. However, the said fact does not find mentioned in the FIR. The petitioner is in custody since 10.6.2009. Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patiala. 13.1.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE