IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.45425 OF 2009 JAI PRAKASH JHA, SON OF LATE BHOLA JHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DADPUR, POLICE STATION JHAJHA, DISTRICT JAMUI VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ******** 3 03/03/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case under Sections 498A, 323, 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is the father-in-law of the lady in question. The allegation is that her father-in-law is not permitting the informant to live in the house. It is stated that the father-in-law is not giving her the share in the house and is also not giving her part of the retiral benefits. The husband in this case has not been made accused and according to the Counsel for the Opposite Party No. 2, the husband is also aggrieved by the fact that his father is not giving him share in the house and money which he has earned through his retiral benefits. Under such circumstances, It appears that the dispute relates to share of the house. It would be open for the petitioner to allow his daughter-in-law to live in the same house. Considering the entire facts, the above named 2 petitioner is directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from today in Jhajha Police Station Case No. 101 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)