-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 27 OF 2003 Girimala Patil & Anr. ..Petitioners. Versus State of Maharashtra & Others. ..Respondents. Mr. B. G. Tangsali for the petitioners. Mr. Vijay D. Patil, Government Pleader for R-1. Mr. S. B. Shetye for R-3. Coram : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & RANJIT MORE, J. Date : December 17, 2011. P. C. : 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the reliefs prayed for in the petition were in respect of the elections which were scheduled to be held in the year 2004. Hence, this petition filed in the year 2003 has become infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioners, however, states that the petitioners would like to make representation to the respondent – Authorities with regard to the subject matter of this PIL insofar as the elections to be held in future are concerned. In view of above, this petition is disposed of as infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to make srp -: 2 :- representation to the respondents – Authorities on the subject matter of the petition. The petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty as above. 2. Since the Public Interest Litigation is disposed of, Civil Application No. 48 of 2007 is also disposed of. [CHIEF JUSTICE] [RANJIT MORE, J.]