IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11594 of 2010 1. ROSHAN ARA KHATOON W/O LATE FAKIR MOHAMMAD R/O 220/6, DERENI TOLA CHOWK, LUCKNOW ( U.P.) 2. SULTAN AKHTAR SON OF MD. AKHTAR R/O VILL- NIRPUR, P.S. SAMASTIPUR, DIST. SAMASTIPUR. --- PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE LAND REFORMS DEPUTY COLLECTOR, SAMASTIPUR, DIST. SAMASTIPUR. 3. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, BLOCK TAJPUR, DIST. SAMASTIPUR 4. MD. ZUBAIR SON OF LATE FAKIR MOHAMMAD R/O 215 SUBHAS MARG, THANA CHOWK, JAHANPATH LUCKNOW (U.P.) --- RESPONDENTS. ----------- 03 20.01.2011 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the State and private respondent are present. Present application has been filed questioning the sustainability of order dated 28.03.2010/29.03.2010, passed by respondent Land Reforms Deputy Collector in Mutation Appeal no. 04 of 2009 ( Md.Zubair vs. Roshan Ara Khatoon & Anr.). Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the order impugned is revisable. In this connection, he refers to the provision contained in Section 16 of the Bihar Tenants Holding (Maintenance of Records) Act 1973. Learned counsel for the State also submits in the same vein. In that view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to interefere with the order. Petitioners, if so advised, may take recourse to the forum available in law. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)