IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI TUESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2010 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 31034 of 2010(D) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- C.A.HAJARA, AGED 36 YEARS, W/O.P.S.KASSIM, PULLOLIL HOUSE, ADIMALY PO, PINCODE-685561,MANNAMKALA BHAGAM,MANNAMKANDAM VILLAGE, DEVIKULAM TALUK, NOW RESIDING AT EDAYALIL HOUSE,NELLIKKUZHY PO,KOTHAMANGALAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,ADIMALY POLICE STATION, ADIMALY-685561. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,ADIMALY POLICE STATION, ADIMALY-685561. 3. P.S.KASSIM, S/O.SAINADHEEN, AGED 40 YEARS PULLOLIL HOUSE,ADIMALY PO,PIN-685561,MANNAMKALA BHAGAM, MANNAMKANDAM VILLAGE, DEVIKULAM TALUK. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS. R3 BY ADV. SMT.C.S.SHEEJA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.31034 OF 2010: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1.TRUE COPY OF SALE DEED BEARING NO.1976/2009 OF DEVIKULAM SRO EXECUTED BY SULEKHA IN FAVOUR OF PETITIONER AND 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P2.TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT NO.33587 DATED 6.10.2010 ISSUED BY MANNAMKANDAM VILLAGE OFFICE. EXT.P3.TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 6.10.2010 LODGED BY PETITIONER BEFORE IST AND 2ND RESPONDENTS. EXT.P4.TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT DATED 6.10.2010 ISSUED BY IST RESPONDENT SHOWING RECEIPT OF EXT.P3. EXT.P5.TRUE COPY OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT DATED 634/2010 DATED 4.8.2010 REGISTERED BY ADIMALY POLICE STATION AGAISNT 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R3A. TRUE COPY OF THE JAMATH COMMITTEE DECISION. K.M.JOSEPH & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.31034 of 2010-D ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 21st day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioner is the wife of the 3rd respondent. She has approached this Court seeking the following relief: “to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction and thereby command the Ist and 2nd respondents to provide adequate and effective protection to the life and property of the petitioner and also for her right to have a peaceful life in her house without any sort of interference, threat or harassment from the 3rd respondent.” 2. We have already passed interim orders including the order dated 19.10.2010. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we dispose of the writ petition by directing that, if the petitioner brings any threat to her life from the 3rd respondent to the notice of the 2nd respondent, the 2nd respondent will look into the matter, and, if the threat is found to be genuine, he shall provide protection for the life of the petitioner as and when required as against respondent WPC 31034/2010 -2- No.3. We record the submission of the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent that the 3rd respondent and children are residing separately. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.C.HARI RANI) JUDGE. MS