1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application (CAN) No.121 of 2010 In Contempt Petition No.170 of 2009 (D) In WP No.4989 of 2008 & WP No.1833 of 1994 (Both Decided) (Shri Santosh Kumar s/o Bhanudas Dhaye v. Shri Suresh Kashinath Dhadod and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Applicant in person. Shri Mujumdar, AGP for Respondent Nos.3 and 5. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 15 th December, 2010 The applicant, appearing in person, specifically contends that the respondents, by filing their replies before the Court in the writ petitions and the contempt petition, have made the false statements and have misrepresented the Court. If this is the allegation made in the application, then it amounts to criminal contempt. It invites the liability under the provision of Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Under Section 18 of the said Act, every case of criminal contempt under Section 15 has to be heard and determined by a Bench of not less than two Judges. 2 In view of this, the present application is not tenable. The same is, therefore, dismissed. Judge pdl