IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8053 of 2010 DINESH MUKHIA @ DINKO MUKHIA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 12.4.2010 Heard Mr. Pramod Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Ramesh Chandra , learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bakhtiarpur P.S. case No. 339 of 2009 dated 15.12.2009 registered under section 366 A/34 of the Indian penal Code. According to the prosecution case one Bindula Kumari daughter of the informant was kidnapped by the accused persons including the petitioner for the purpose of marriage. During the course of investigation the alleged victim Bindula Kumari was recovered and her statement was recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C. on 24th December 2009, where the learned Magistrate has assessed her age to be 19 years and alleged victim has also disclosed her age to be 19 years. She has clearly stated that she was in love with the petitioner and she was not kidnapped by any body rather she has voluntarily married the petitioner in a Temple. Learned counsel for the State, though opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but has not disputed the aforesaid - 2 - position. In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today , be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Saharsa in connection with the above noted case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) M.Rahman