1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL WRIT No. 1910 of 2008 GOPAL SINGH RAJPUROHIT V/S STATE & ORS. Mr. MUKESH RAJPUROHIT, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 1.4.2008 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI SANGEET LODHA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the purported resolution of the Gram Panchayat was never passed, and therefore, entire action being taken is wholly without jurisdiction. It would suffice to say that it is a disputed question of fact that as to whether resolution was passed, or not if the petitioner has any basis that it was not passed as per rules, it was always open to him to take appropriate legal proceedings requesting the State Government to proceed against the Gram Panchayat concerned, or the delinquents. The other grievance is that by bifurcation of the 2 village various amenities would be segregated which would adversely affect the petitioner. Then, the next submission made is that the nomenclature of the new village is being put in the name of individual person which cannot be permitted. In this regard, in our view, so far creation of new village is concerned is a policy matter of the State Government or the concerned authority in which we do not find any sufficient ground to interfere in our public interest jurisdiction. So far as segregation of amenities are concerned, the petitioner may seek appropriate remedy available to him according to law. It is informed that the petitioner has already sent some representations to the State Government. It is always open to the petitioner to pursue those representations, and it is expected that those representations if received shall be considered on merits in accordance with law. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. ( SANGEET LODHA ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /Sushil/