CR No.1745 of 2007 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.:6672-C of 2007 CR No.1745 of 2007 (O&M) Decided on :23.11.2009 Yogesh Kumar ... Petitioner versus Arjun Singh & others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Atul Lakhanpal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arjun Lakhanpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harsh Garg, Advocate for the respondents. **** 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This order shall also dispose of CR Nos.1745 & 1746 of 2007 as common questions of facts and law are involved. This petition has been filed against the order of the ld. Lower Appellate Court passed under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 restraining the petitioner from raising any construction on the property or alienating it in any manner. In my opinion, the interest of both the parties would be adequately safeguard if it is clarified that any construction made would be at the risk and cost of the petitioner. Further if CR No.1745 of 2007 (O&M) -2- the petitioner make any alienation of any kind the same would be subject to this litigation and the document by which the alienation is made, would carry a specific stipulation that the said alienation would be subject to the result of the present civil suit and the proposed alienee would be bound by the same. With these modifications, this revision petition is allowed. No costs. Since the main case has been decided, all the pending civil miscellaneous applications if any, stand disposed of. November 23, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE