IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 10259 of 2007 Between: 1 Ch.Swapnaa, d/o Ch.Yadagiri, Student of Ist year Engineering in DRK institute of Science and Technology Bowrampet (Village) Via Airforce Academy Hyderabad-043, r/o H.No.1-37-1464/65, Balamrai, Anna Nagar, secunderabad. 2 A.Santoshi Sravanthi, d/o A.Sambasiva Rao, Student of Ist year Engineering in DRK Institute of Science & Technology Bowrampet (V),via Airforce Academy,Hyd. r/o 344A, Sri Nilaya Township, Bandangipet Village, Saroornagar (M), R.R.District being a minor rep., by her father Sri A.Sambasiva Rao. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Vice Chancellor of Jawaharlal Nehru Technology of University, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. 2 the Registrar, J.N.T.U., Kukatpally, Hyderabad. 3 The Controller of Examinations, JNTU, Kukatpally, Hyderabad--072. 4 The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of Secondary and Higher Education, Govt.of India, Sastry Bhavan, New Delhi. 5 the Management of D.R.K.Institute of Science and Technology, Bowrampet Village, via Air Force Academy, Hyderabad-043, rep., by its Chairman. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not issuing Hall Ticket to the petitioners to write the Ist Semister in Engineering course in Computer Science examinations started on 7-5- 2007 to 21-5-2007 onwards is in violation of principles of natural justice in not issuing notice/passing rejection orders before issuing the Hall Tickets to others, and pass suchother order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MS.K.N.VIJAYA LAXMI Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.RATHANGA PANI REDDY The Court made the following : O R D E R:- The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no lis to be adjudicated in this writ petition and the matter has become infructuous. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 4th March, 2009 bcj