IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.94 of 2008 1. SURENDRA NARAYAN JHA @ BAIDHYA NARAYAN JHA, son of Sri Chandra Narayan Jha 2. Bhogendra Jha son of late Chandra Shekhar Jha, both residents of Titra Ashananand, PS Sakra, Distt. Muzaffarpur ..... Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Sri J.R.M Pillai, the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. Sri Ashish Ranjan Sinha, S/o not known Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna 4. Sri Gupteshwar Pandey, S/o not known Deputy Inspector General of Bihar, Muzaffarpur 5. Sri Sunil Kumar, S/o not known Zonal Inspector General Police, Tirhut Range, Muzaffarpur 6. Sri Binay Kumar, S/o not known District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur 7. Sri Ratna Sanjay, S/o not known Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur 8. Sri Sudhakar Mishra, S/o not known Officer-in-Charge, Sakra PS, Muzaffarpur 9. Sri Bidyanand, S/o not known Circle Officer, Moroul 10. Sri Kumar Ravi, S/o not known Subdivisional Officer (East) Muzaffarpur 11. ....... Opp. Party Ist Set 12. Dorik Paswan son of late Ghulhai Paswan 13. Devendra Paswan son of Ganaur Paswan 14. Jai Kishun Paswan son of Butai Paswan 15. Dhanai Paswan son of Butan Paswan 16. Kishuni Ram son of Mahendra Ram 17. Rajendra Ram son of Buta Ram 18. Jagan Paswan son of Guru Charan Paswan 19. Nanki Ram son of Ramdev Ram 20. Kalewar Ram son of Udai Ram 21. Prem Chandra Sah son of Dukhi Sah 22. Nageshwar Paswan son of late Batahu Paswan, all residents of village Titra Ashanand, police station- Sakra, District Muzaffarpur 23. Bujhawan Pandit son of Mehar Chand Pandit resident of village Titra Bishanpur PS Sakra District Muzaffarpur ....... Opp. Party 2nd set. 2 28-04-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are not satisfied with the action of respondents and want further protection of their possession over some lands in the district of Muzaffarpur. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that 2 pursuant to order of the writ court dated 24-11-2004 (annexure-1) illegal encroachment upon the lands of the petitioners was removed and they were put back in possession as per report of the Circle Inspector submitted to Anchal Adhikari Moroul contained in annexure-D dated 25-2-2008. On going through the order of the Writ Court, it is found that there was no direction to deprive of possession of others and put the petitioners back in possession over any land. The direction was only to the extent that if petitioners are found in possession as per claim and if there is any threat to their possession in that case the district administration shall offer required protection to the petitioners at the time of cultivation and harvesting over the concerned lands. The district administration has already helped the petitioners beyond whatever was required under the orders of this court. No further direction is required in this matter. The contempt proceeding is dropped. BKS/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)