••<< J-'&S HjGH_CQyRT_QECHHAn'i'SG_ASH^TBiLASPUR :R : Vinod Kapoor S/o Radhakishan Kapoor, aged about 39 years, R/o Sawariya Building, Raigarh (CG). VERSUS jSPONDENTS : 1. StateofC.G.ThroughtheCoiiector,Raigarh(CG). 2. Nagar Pallka Nigam, Through Commissioner, Raigarh (CG.5. WRiT PETITiON UNOER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INDiA jB^Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihptri. J. Freseni; Shri Pankaj Shrivasta'/a, Advocate fortiie peiitioner. Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, Deputy Advocats Genera! for the State. Shri Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, Advocate For the respondent No. 2. ORALOROER (Passed on 25" day of November, 2008) I. VVith the consent of the partles, the matter is taken up for hearing finaliy. 2. Shri Shrivastava, learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to contest the petjtion on merit at this stage. However, the petitioner submits that since the petitioner has atreaciy fiied his reply to the show cause notice dated ni! (Annexure P/3), the same may be considered in accordance wlth Saw, on its own merits, as expeditiousiy as possibfe. No objection from other side. 3. Shri Tiwari, iearned counsei appearing for the respondent No. 2 submits that the repiy fiied by the petitioner sliail be considered and proper decision in accordance with iaw, on its own merits, may be taken within a period of three weeKs. 4. in view of that, according to iearned counse) appearing for the petitioner, 'hothing sun/ives for adjudlcation. 5. Accordingiy, the writ petition stands disposed of. However, having regard to facts situatlon of the case, interim reilef granted on 25.06.2005, not to demolish the disputed shop, shati continue for a further period of three weeks. S. Consequently, ^4(W)P No. 4725/05, appiication for interim relief, stands disposed of. —i— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge