- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.452 OF 2006 SUMMONS NO.452 OF 2006 SUMMONS NO.452 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.277 OF 1976 NO.277 OF 1976 NO.277 OF 1976 Jaico Press Pvt.Ltd. ...Plaintiff vs. Orkay Internatinoal ...Defendant And M/s.Orkay International ...Respondent Mr.U.J.Makhija i/b M/s.Thakordas & Madgavkar for Plaintiff Mr.Kalpesh Jaoshi i/b M/s.Malvi Ranchoddas for the Defendant CORAM CORAM CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : AUGUST 9,2007 : AUGUST 9,2007 : AUGUST 9,2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the plaintiff in support of the chamber summons. I have heard the learned counsel for the defendants and respondents in the chamber summons. The chamber summons is for amendment of the plaint. Inviting my attention to the schedule annexed to the chamber summons, the learned counsel for the plaintiff submitted that instead of deleting the name of existing defendants, the plaintiffs be permitted to add the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 as the defendant numbers 2 to 5. He states that the proposed defendant 1e has expired. The learned counsel for the defendant and respondents in chamber summons has no serious objection for adopting the said course. 2. Hence, chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) with a modification that instead of deleting the original defendant, the plaintiffs are permitted to add respondent Nos.1 to 4 as defendant Nos.2 to 5 after describing the original defendant as the defendant No.1. Amendment to be carried out within a period of three weeks from today.