:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 317 OF 2006 Nilesh Kumar Shantilal Jain .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and anr. .. Respondents Mr. Subhash Jha i/by M/s. Law Global for Petitioner. Mr. D.S. Mhaispurkar, APP for State. CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE & CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE & CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE & SMT. R.S. DALVI,JJ. SMT. R.S. DALVI,JJ. SMT. R.S. DALVI,JJ. Date : February 21, 2006. Date : February 21, 2006. Date : February 21, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . We are surprised to see that writ petition under Article 226 has been filed seeking directions to implement the orders passed by us in the earlier round of similar writ petition. We need not look into such petitions when the petitioner has some other remedy. . The petition is, therefore, rejected as misconceived. . This order will not come in the way of the petitioner to take recourse to appropriate alternate remedy. :2: (Smt.R.S. Dalvi,J.) (Smt.R.S. Dalvi,J.) (Smt.R.S. Dalvi,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle, J.) (B.H. Marlapalle, J.) (B.H. Marlapalle, J.)