IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 3397 of 2010 Date of decision : 28.01.2011 Meena Goyal .....Petitioner VERSUS Housing Board Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Anil Shukla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate and Mr. Mrigank Sharma, Advocate for respondents No. 1, 2 and 4. Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for respondent No. 3. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Meena Goyal wife of Sh. Pawan Kumar Goel has filed this writ petition seeking quashing of report (Annexure P-15) of the Committee and for quashing the action of respondent No. 1 allotting SCF site No. 47 Adampur to respondent No. 3. As per the petitioner, he has made a bid for site No. 47 on the envelop whereas inside the application, site mentioned was 43-C. Besides, some other allegations are also made. As per the petitioner, the bid has not been properly analysed. There are various cutting noticed in the bid documents and it appears that the bids were not properly analysed. Counsel for the respondents submits that in order to remove all the doubts in this regard, the official respondents are prepared to invite fresh bids for this site giving opportunity to the petitioner as well as to respondent No. 3 to participate therein. Civil Writ Petition No. 3397 of 2010 -2- In view of the same, the present writ petition is disposed of with the direction that respondents No. 1, 2 and 4 to invite fresh bid for site No. 47, Adampur giving fair opportunity to the petitioner as well as to respondent No. 3 or to any other person, who may be interested in making a bid for the said site. Respondent No. 3 has already deposited nearly Rs. 12 lakhs. If he so desires, he may make an application for refund thereof. Respondent No. 3 would have an option to await for the outcome of the fresh bids and for adjustment of the amount already deposited, in case he remains successful in the bid. January 28, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE