HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W. P. (Cl No. 797/2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENT M/s. Raipur Bus Servrice Through Managing Partner Gurmit Singh, S/o 8.8. Sandhu, aged about 45 years, R/o Ganj Para, Durg, District Durg (C.G). Vs. Regional Transport Authority, Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE, 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Mr. B.L. Dembra, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Shashank Thakur, counsel for the respondent. ORAL ORDER (25.02.2010) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J, Heard finally with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner M/s. Raipur Bus Ser^ice has filed this petition for issuance of necessary direction to the Regional Transport Authority, Raipur to consider and decide its application for grant of the Regular Permit on the route Raipur to Mungeli via Simga, Nandghat and back one return trip daily in accordance with the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act. According to the petitioner, the said application has been filed on 22.07.2008 and no decision has been taken till date. Mr. Shashank Thakur, learned counsel for the respondent submits that if the said application has been filed by the petitioner and the samehas not been disposed of till date, the Regional Transport Authority, Raipur shall dispose of the same at the earliest in accordance with law. '^S£ W. P (C\ N0. 797/2010 In view of the above submissions made by learned counsel for the respondent, this petition is disposed ofwith a direction that ifthe concerned Regional Transport Authority has not decided the application dated 22.7.2008 filed by the petitioner for grant of the Regular Permit for the above route till date, the same shall be disposed of in accordance with law, as early as possible preferably within a period of 10 weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order by the petitioner before the said authority. With the aforesaid direction/observation, this petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Rao fe