2306wp2402.11.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2402 OF 2011 Mr.Amil Ali Janmohammad Gilani and ors. ..vs.. Mr.Sherali B.Hirani and ors. ............................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ............................................................................................................................................................... Mr. S.S.Khadse, Adv. for the petitioners. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : 23rd June, 2011. The above petition is directed against the order dated 21/4/2011 passed by the learned In-charge District Judge, Kelapur, by which the application (Exh.2) for stay pending Appeal filed by the petitioner herein, who was the appellant before the First Appellate Court, came to be rejected. The reasons why the stay has been rejected can be found in paragraph 4 of the impugned order. The sub and substance of the reasons, is that in the 7/12 extracts this appellant got his name mutated in a hasty manner, through the Revenue Inspector, who has no jurisdiction, on account of which the Revenue Inspector is suspended pending Departmental Enquiry. The First Appellate Court also took into consideration the fact that there was no stay or injunction operating in favour of the appellant pending the suit. The conduct of the appellant and his son have also been observed 2306wp2402.11.odt 2 in the said paragraph 4. The Trial Court has also held that the revenue record inter alia discloses the possession of the respondents. Considering the said reasons, in my view, no case for interference is made out. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. JUDGE chute