IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 9TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 18TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 33791 of 2010(Y) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- FASLU REHMAN.P,S/O.AIMU HAJI,AGED 22 YRS PALLIKKARA HOUSE,CHENGOTTUR.P.O,KOTTAKKAL VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTICT.(OWNER OF KL-10Y/1759). BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE/REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,OFFICE OF RDO,PERINTHALMANNA.PO MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679322. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KOLATHUR--POLICE STATION,KOLATHUR.P.O,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679338. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 33791 of 2010 Y ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 9th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T In this Writ Petition, the petitioner complains that his vehicle has been detained on the allegation that the vehicle was used for transportation of river sand in violation of the provisions contained in the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001. According to the petitioner, he has made application for interim custody of the vehicle but, his application was not considered. With this grievance, this Writ Petition has been filed. 2. A Full Bench of this Court in Shan C.T. Vs. State of Kerala [2010 (3) KHC 333] has laid down the manner in which such applications for interim custody should be dealt with. Therefore, all that is necessary in this Writ Petition is to direct the statutory authority, before whom the application has been made, shall deal with the application in the light of the W.P.(C) No.33791/10 : 2 : provisions of the Act referred above and in the manner as directed by the Full Bench of this Court in the judgment referred as above. Ordered accordingly. 3. Petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the concerned authority for appropriate action. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks