IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37165 of 2010 LALOO THAKUR @ OM PRAKASH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 25.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Allegedly, petitioner and other FIR named accused went at the house of one Mahavir Rai and FIR named accused Bhushan Thakur committed his murder by giving dagger blow to him. So far as petitioner is concerned, he was also present with the aforesaid accused and other persons and he as well as co-accused Radhey Thakur hurled farsa blow on the informant but luckily, informant escaped. The reason behind the alleged occurrence is due to previous enmity as son of the deceased Mahavir Rai abducted the grand daughter of Bhushan Thakur. Considering the facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, in my view, it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case no. 103/2010 is rejected. However, at the time of consideration of regular bail application of petitioner before the learned Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, the learned Sessions Judge shall consider regular bail application of the petitioner, particularly, keeping in mind the role played by the petitioner in the alleged occurrence. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)