IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9329 of 2010 BAKHORA KEWANI, SON OF CHAMARI KEWANI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17/03/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 3.9.2009 but he has renewed his prayer for bail on the basis of a compromise petition having been filed by the Informant in the court below. In the aforesaid circumstances, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 13.1.2009. be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Rafiganj P.S. Case No. 148 of 2008 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed - 2 - for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. The Magistrate before releasing the petitioner on bail will verify the fact that in fact there has been a compromise between the parties by noticing the Informant. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)