IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Rev. No.245 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : FEBRUARY 25, 2010 TILAK ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Namit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) For the reasons recorded in order of even dated, passed in CRR 260 of 2010 (Vinod Kumar vs. State of Haryana), the revision petition is accepted in regard to sentence. The sentence of the petitioner is reduced to already undergone. The sentence in regard to fine is maintained. February 25, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?