IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.907 of 2007 REENA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3. 16.9.2008. This Cr. Revision has been filed against the order of acquittal dated 4.5.2007 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-V, Gopalganj in Sessions Trial No. 313 of 2006/41 of 2006. Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the impugned order. It appears that opposite party no. 2 and his daughter Pinki Devi were put on trial under Section 302 along with other sections of the I.P.C. Court below after consideration of the oral evidence as well as facts and circumstances convicted Pinki Devi under Sections 302/307 I.P.C. However, Lallan Upadhyay was acquitted from the charge levelled against him for conspiracy. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that Lallan Upadhyay conspired with his daughter and got Upendra Mishra murdered through his daughter. However, on perusal of paragraph 17 of - 2 - the impugned judgment it appears that there was no cogent evidence or circumstance to show that Lallan Upadhyay conspired with his daughter for commission of murder. Under the facts and circumstances, I find no merit in this Cr. Revision. Accordingly, the same is rejected. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)