1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 1560/2009 Narendrasingh Ramchandrasingh Chavan ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra thr. PSO PS Murtizapur --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Mohta, Advocate for applicant. Mr. Thakare, A.P.P. for State. CORAM:- S. S. SHINDE, J. DATED :- 5 th NOVEMBER,2009 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicant. The learned counsel for the applicant invited my attention to the contents of complaint as well as order impugned in this application and submitted that the applicant is tenant of the premises. The premises are in his possession. The accused forcibly entered into shop and tried to take possession of the articles belonging to him. The learned counsel further submitted that the lower Court has not properly considered the contentions advanced by the applicant, therefore, this Court may interfere in the matter and set aside the impugned order passed by the Courts below. The learned counsel invited my attention to the grounds taken in the application and annexures 2 therewith and submitted that this application deserves to be allowed. 2. Learned A.P.P. for the State submitted that the offence was registered under Sections 380 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code. On investigation, nothing could be found. There are no witnesses to support case of the applicant. 3. On careful perusal of the impugned order, I am of the considered view that the material, which was brought on record has been properly considered by the Courts below. The Court has taken note of the investigation, the papers as well as report submitted to the Court and recorded finding that there is no single witness to support case of the applicant. I do not see any reason to interfere in the well reasoned order passed by the Courts below. Hence, the criminal application is misconceived and the same is rejected. JUDGE kahale