IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 5683 of 2008. Decided on: 25th October, 2010. Ashok K. Sharma. .….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. …. .. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Surinder Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: (i) That the impugned Annexure A-6 dated 18th Dec.,1998 may be quashed and set aside. (ii) That the respondent State may be directed to duly recognize the Diploma/Certificate issued by the J & K Government, vide Annexure A-I, at par with Diploma/Certificate issued by the State of H.P.” 2. In the preliminary submission of the reply filed by respondent No.3, it is stated at paras 1 and 2 as follows: “1. In this connection, it is submitted that initially the name of the applicant was registered in Sub Office Employment Exchange, Bhoranj, District Hamirpur on 2.2.1993 vide Regn. No.72/93 NCO Code No.075.90 (Copy of X-1 enclosed as R-1). Since the applicant did not get the same renewed in time, resultantly the same was lapsed in May, 1996. The applicant again got his 2 name registered on 7.6.1996 vide Reg. No.781/96 NCO 075.90 meant for Stock Assistant. 2. The allegation of the applicant that his name has not been sponsored to the respondent No.2 is baseless as no post of Stock Assistant has been notified by the Respondent No.2 to the Sub Office Employment Exchange, Bhoranj. The Employment Exchange only acts after the post is notified by the employer. The main confusion of the applicant is that his diploma which he has obtained from J&K Govt. has not been recognized by the respondent No.2.” 3. There is no rejoinder as yet. In case the petitioner has still any grievance left, it will be open to him to approach the first respondent, in which case the matter will be considered by the first respondent, adverting to the submissions made in the representation and the orders passed thereon within a period of another four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment by the petitioner. 4. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 25th October, 2010 (Justice Kuldip Singh), (tr) Judge. 3