IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID TUESDAY, THE 24TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 5TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 15294 of 2007(U) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SHABU NARAYANAN, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O. NARAYANAN, PADINJASSERIL HOUSE,MUNIYARA P.O., MUNIYARA, KONNATHADY. BY ADVS. MR.C.S.MANU, MR.ANOOP.V.NAIR. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI. 2. SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI. 3. A.O. JOSE, EZHUTHUPURAYIL HOUSE, KADAPLAMATTOM P.O., PALA. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SHYSON P. MANGUZHA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. HARUN-UL-RASHID,J. --------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.15294 OF 2007 ---------------------------- DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2009 JUDGMENT Ext.P4 notice is under challenge. Ext.P4 only requested the petitioner to appear before the Regional Transport Officer, Idukki on 21/5/2007 at 11 a.m. in connection with the suggestion of timings/objection raised against the timings of SC KL 35-1989. Petitioner challenges Ext.P4 notice stating that only if a change of circumstances arises in the route, the 2nd respondent is justified to issue Ext.P4. According to the petitioner, there is no change of circumstances on the above said route and hence Ext.P4 is illegal. I find that Ext.P4 is only a notice calling upon the petitioner and other affected parties to appear before the Regional Transport Authority for hearing. I do not find any reason to interfere with the notice issued in accordance with law. Moreover, the date fixed for appearance namely, 21/5/2007 is already over. Writ petition has become infructuous and it is according dismissed. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge kcv.