1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No. 460/ 2010 [Smt. Sujasta Dharamdas Nandagavali vs. State of Maharashtra & others} Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr.R.R.Deshpande, Advocate for the petitioner Mr N.S.Khubalkar, APP for the respondent-sole ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 07th October,2010. Heard. Perused the affidavit filed by the respondents. It is seen that Police cannot make a preliminary enquiry. The objection of preliminary enquiry is to enquire as to whether the description contained in the report prima facie is worth cognizance. If opinion reached by the Police that it is difficult to know as to who owns the business (shop) and when petitioner can file a private complaint, we deem it unnecessary to 2 grant any indulgence. Petition is rejected. Judge Judge sahare