CRM-M-30854-2011 [ 1 ] ::::::: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-30854-2011 Date of decision:06.12.2011 Sukhminderpal Singh alias Kala ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. SPS Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. A.S.Rai, DAG, Punjab. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This is a petition for grant of regular bail in a pending trial case registered vide FIR No.57 dated 08.06.2010, under Sections 307, 324, 323, 326, 325, 148, 149 of IPC and Sections 25/27/54/59 of the Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station Gharinda, District Amritsar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had earlier filed CRM-M-24258-2010 which was dismissed as withdrawn. Thereafter, he filed CRM-M-27988-2010 which was withdrawn with liberty to be filed after framing of the charge. He then filed CRM-M-15480-2011 in which notice was issued, but on instructions of the petitioner, the same was withdrawn during the pendency of the notice. Now, the petitioner has filed the present bail application in which he has averred that his case is at par with Dharminder Singh alias Rana (non-applicant/co-accused) who has already been granted bail by the learned Court below vide order dated 05.01.2011. He further submits that there are total 8 accused in this case, out of which 7 are on bail. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had fired from his .12 bore gun. The first shot hit Mukhtiar Singh on his abdomen, legs and left arm, whereas the second shot hit Kabal Singh CRM-M-30854-2011 [ 2 ] ::::::: on his left leg. The petitioner is stated to be in custody from 10.06.2010 and he had also suffered two grievous injuries with the sharp edged weapons in the said occurrence. He further submits that the petitioner is neither a previous convict nor any other case is pending against him. Learned State Counsel, on instructions received from ASI Dilbag Singh, concedes the aforesaid facts. After hearing both the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, but without making any observation on the merits, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. December 06, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE