IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12749 of 2010 KAPILDEO SINGH @ KAPIL MAHTO SON OF RAMANAND MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 19.7.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 120B, 181, 193, 420, 468, 471 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that certain forged and fabricated documents were used for securing bail for co-accused Vijay Kumar Mandal. However, the said Vijay Kumar Mandal was granted bail on the ground that he himself was behind the bars and, therefore, could not be responsible for forging the documents. So far the petitioner is concerned, the allegation against him is that he had taken a contract for Rs. 2 lacs for securing bail for Vijay Kumar Mandal and had with dubious means procured bail for the said Vijay Kumar Mandal. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the serious ramification of the offence. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )