Crl. Misc. No.M-25494 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-25494 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 13, 2010 Roshan Lal …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and another …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Claiming, that despite having been a victim, the petitioner has been involved in a false case of assault regarding which a representation has been submitted to DIG Border Range, the petitioner seeks a direction from this court for entrustment of the investigation to some senior officer so that the petitioner may not suffer on the basis of unfair investigation. Notice of motion to Advocate General, Punjab. Crl. Misc. No.M-25494 of 2010 [2] On the asking of the Court, Mr.Abhishekh Chautala, AAG, Punjab, accepts notice. I have considered the facts and circumstances of the case. The petitioner being an accused is not entitled to seek a direction for interference in the investigation but in view of the claim of the petitioner that Eno Bhatti injured had been medico legally examined at Gurdaspur and Amritsar as per In-patent Bed Head Ticket shown in the Court, the only direction can be given in this case is that before presentation of challan, the entire investigation will be brought to the notice of SSP, Gurdaspur who would ensure that investigation in the matter is in consonance with the principle of fairness and the provisions of law under Chapter XII of the Cr.P.C. and the relevant provisions of Punjab Police Rules. Dismissed. September 13, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE