IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35043 of 2011 1. Fulpatiya Devi, W/o Gaya Rai 2. Pramila Devi W/o Lali Rai 3. Gaya Rai S/o Late Mahabir Rai. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 19.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Sections 326, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is stated that from perusal of the first information report itself, it would appear that co-accused Mithilesh Rai is the person who poured kerosene oil upon the informant and tried to set her on fire. In the first information report itself, it is stated that on receiving injury when the informant raised alarm, her sister-in-law tried to quench the fire by throwing water over her. The mother-in-law and father-in-law took her to private clinic for treatment. It is also submitted that the parties have compromised the case and on the basis of that other co-accused persons have been granted regular bail by the court below. Petitioner No.1 happens to be mother-in-law, petitioner no.2 is sister-in-law (gotini), and petitioner no.3 is father-in-law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of the order be released on bail 2 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 56 of 2011, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Md. Ibrarul (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)