1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1431 of 2009 (Narayan s/o Abasaheb Abdagire vs. The State and another) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mrs. S.G.Chincholkar, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. D.R.Korde, APP, for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 15/9/2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard learned Counsel for the accused/applicant. 2. The complainant was threatened by the accused/applicant; since the complainant deals in digging borewell, the accused applicant wanted Rs.5,000/- as ransom. The complainant paid Rs.1,000/-, however, accused/applicant was not satisfied. He threatened the complainant, man-handled him. Request for pre-arrest bail was rejected by the learned Additional 2 Sessions Judge. 3. Reading the report of the complainant, primary role of the accused/applicant in the act of threatening for extortion is indicated. It is not that the accused/applicant could have been falsely implicated by the complainant for satisfaction of any other ruse. Custodial interrogation will resolve as to the concealment of Rs.1,000/- collected by the accused/applicant. 4. Application lacks merit. Rejected. The observations are prima facie in nature. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/1431-09crapl