^, ^ v> igis t IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR FIRST APPEAL N0. S-?? / 2005 ~^ APPELLANT: <,.M/s Umesh Chandra 65 / (Defendant) Company, a partnership firm duly registered under the Partnership Act carryin; on the business at Gudhiyari, Raipur. ^ RESPONDENT: (Plaintiff) z^. -.•<<4/' -••' y ..*'~ ^^ v^^ ^/^y <i^^-" <^y: (%.^ Dr. T.N. Mehrotra, aged about 69 years, son of Late Bijnath Mehrotra, Retired Dean, Medical College Hospital, Raipur, r.esident of MIG-12, Sector-3, Shankar Nagar, Raipur. Stamp for plaint Rs.65, 500/- Stamp for appeal Rs.7>'720/^.- This appeal valued at^Rs.65,500/- Court fee affixed Rs.7,720/- APPEAL UNDER SECTION^6 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE,1908 •^s^ *3i£-®^K?a:''*;3S 3tS^ i a-.-..- .;_y^y /^ :a&^ »tli Appellant Defendant LOK ADALAT CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT CAMPUS: BILASPUR FirstAppeal N0.23/2005 M/s Umesh Chandra & Company '<7 Respondent Plaintiff Versus Dr. T. N. Mehrotra (Appeal under Section 96 ofCode ofdvil Procedure, 1908) Present: - Shri Kshitiz Sharma, counsel for the appellant. Shri Keshav Dewangan, counsel for respondent. ORDER (Passedon 02-04-2011) Heard. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the parties have jointly filed an application in support of the affidavit for disposal of the matter on compromise which took place out of the Court. They have mentioned in the application that the decree is already satisfied out of the Court by payment of the decretal amount for full and final satisfaction ofthe decree. 3. The compromise application is taken on record. 4. Accordingly, this appeal is disposed off in terms of the aforesaid application. II •e. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava ^ Judge Meinber ~ LokAQ'atat HighCourt BitASPUR(C.Q.) Sd/- Meniber- ' cou^ofchAart;^ laspur