CWP No.1548 of 1984 (O&M) and connected case [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (1) CWP No.1548 of 1984 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.11.2011 Buta Ram son of Suba Ram, resident of V. Pir Bux Chauhan Tehsil and Distt. Ferozepur and others. ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through Secretary to Govt. Punjab, Revenue Department, Chandigarh and others. ... Respondents (2) CWP No.1846 of 1984 (O&M) Dharam Chand son of Buta Ram, resident of Village Pir Bux Chauhan Tehsil and Distt. Ferozepur and others. ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through Secretary to Govt. Punjab, Revenue Department, Chandigarh and others. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:Mr. Sarjit Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jagdev Singh, Advocate and Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Navdeep Sukhna, DAG, Punjab, for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. S.C. Khungar, Advocate and Mr. Sandeep Khungar, Advocate, for the LRs of respondent No.5. ***** 1.Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? NO 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? NO CWP No.1548 of 1984 (O&M) and connected case [2] K. KANNAN, J. (Oral) 1. The Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner says that the writ petitions could be disposed of on the same lines as was done in CWP No.5556 of 1985 but it would further require to be clarified that the impugned orders are set aside and that the Collector shall make a redetermination in the hands of the legal heirs of the deceased-land owner. 2. With these clarifications, both the writ petitions are allowed and the redetermination shall take place in the light of the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in “Sardara Singh and others v. The Financial Commissioner and others, 2008(2) RCR (Civil) 744”. NOVEMBER 23, 2011 ( K. KANNAN ) Rajan JUDGE