1 174.11-revn(st.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 174 OF 2011 Bhagyshree Nitin Deshpande. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and another. ... Respondents. Vikas Shivarkar for the applicant. A.S.Shitole, APP for the State. Arun K. Chavan for respondent No.2. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. DATED : 8th July 2011. P.C. : The respondent No.2 was convicted by the trial Court for the offence under section 498-A and 324 of I.P.C. 2. In an appeal preferred by respondent-2, conviction under section 498-A was reversed. In so far as conviction under section 324 is concerned, though the same was maintained the sentence has been reduced to fine of Rs.25,000/-. 3. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that taking into consideration the gravity of injuries sustained by the applicant, the appellate Court ought not to have entertained appeal and interfered with the order of the trial Court. 2 174.11-revn(st.) 5. The perusal of the prosecution case itself would reveal that ingredients to constitute offence under section 324 were not available. At the most the case could be under section 323. 6. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the learned appellate Court. Revision application is, therefore, rejected. (B.R.GAVAI, J.)