:1: :1: :1: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1899 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s Orders Orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Shekar, Adv. for the petitioners. None for the respondents. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 25TH MARCH, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. There is no reason to interfere with the impugned order, which is inter-locutory. Merely because the petitioner wife admits that she is employed and earning some salary, the court below could not have rejected the request for payment of litigation expenses atleast. The petitioner is at liberty to renew that request by making appropriate application. Similarly, if the petitioner is unable to sustain herself and desires that there should :2: :2: :2: be some amount paid to her towards her maintenance commensurate with the status of the family, then, nothing prevents her from filing another Application and pointing out the changed circumstances. If such an Application is made, the Trial Court to consider the same without being influenced by the earlier order and observations. The Trial Court to also consider expeditious disposal of the main proceedings. With these observations, this Writ petition is disposed off. No costs. ********