IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.2245 of 2010 Between: N. Peddanna ... PETITIONER AND The Prohibition and Excise Commissioner, Hyderabad and two others ... RESPONDENTS ORDER: The matter is coming up for admission. 2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise had taken notice on 05-02-2010 and requested time to get instructions. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise would submit that no representation of the petitioner is pending. The learned counsel for the petitioner, however, asserts that the representation already had been made. 4. The Writ Petition is filed seeking a writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the second and third respondents in not considering the representation dated 11-03-2009 made by the petitioner for continuation of T.F.T. Licence of Counter No.1 of Maruru Village, Rapthadu Mandal, Anantapur District, as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 11-03-2009 and pass such other suitable orders. 5. In the light of the facts and circumstances, this court is of the considered opinion that the writ petition be disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation to the third respondent within a period of two (2) weeks and on receipt of such representation let the third respondent consider and dispose of the same within a period of four (4) weeks thereafter. 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ P.S. NARAYANA, J February 11, 2010. PN THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.2245 of 2010 February 11, 2010