In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh R. S. A. No. 3587 of 2004 Date of decision : 1.9.2008 Kartar Singh ..... Appellant vs Bishan Singh and others ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant. Rajesh Bindal J. The respondent no. 1/plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction against the contesting respondents no.2 to 4/ defendants. After the receipt of notice, the present appellant filed a counter claim for seeking possession. The trial court dismissed the civil suit as well as the counter- claim filed by the respondent and the present appellant. The appellant was not aggrieved against the judgment of the trial court. It was only the respondent no.1/plaintiff who filed appeal where his claim was accepted and injunction was granted. The defendant is in appeal before this court against the judgment and decree of the learned lower appellate court. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant, I do not find any merit in the appeal. Mere filing of counter-claim for possession in the suit filed for permanent injunction by the respondent/plaintiff shows that the appellant admitted the respondent/plaintiff in possession of the property. Once that part is admitted, the judgment and decree passed by the lower appellate court cannot be said to be faulty where injunction prayed for by the plaintiff has been granted. No question of law has been arises for consideration of this court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. 1.9.2008 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge