03/ 30th June 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.944 of 2010 1. Mitrajit Prasad S/O Late Hari Prasad R/O Mohalla- East Tilak Nagar, Kankarbagh, Town Distt.- Patna- 20…………………………………...Petitioner/Appellant Versus 1. The State Bank Of India Through General Manager, S.B.I. Local Head Office West Gandhi Maidan, P.S.- Gandhi Maidan, Town + Distt.- Patna 2. Deputy General Manager Module S.B.I., Zonal Office, Patna 3. Assistant General Manager Region-Ii S.B.I., Zonal Office, Patna 4. The Chief Manager, State Bank Of India (S.B.I.) Commercial Branch, Patliputra, P.S.- Patliputra, Branch (9600), Town & Distt.- Patna……………...Respondents ----------- Heard learned counsel for the appellant- petitioner. None appears for the Bank despite service. After perusing paragraph-13 of the writ petition, paragraph-17 of the counter affidavit and paragraph-21 of the reply to the counter affidavit (rejoinder affidavit) the dispute remains subsisting. Therefore the respondent is directed to take a fresh decision considering the averments made in paragraph- 21 of the reply to the counter affidavit (rejoinder affidavit) a copy of which has already been served on the learned counsel for the Bank. The learned counsel for the appellant- 2 petitioner shall produce the certified copy of this order along with certified copy of the affidavit in reply to the counter affidavit of the Respondent-Bank and the General Manager of the State Bank of India, Respondent No.1. shall decide the matter within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy in accordance with the Rules No. 32, 33, and 34 of Old Service Rule Regarding Leave after giving full opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. With the above observations, the appeal stands disposed of. perwez (Prakash Chandra Verma, J.) (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)