IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27028 of 2009 SUDARSHAN YADAV @ SUDARSHAN RAI, son of late Jhagru Yadav resident of village-Kunja Tola, P.S.-Chandi, Distt.-Bhojpur, at present Ministrial Quarter (Peon Qr.) Nawada Ara, P.S.-Ara, Nawada, Distt.-Bhojpur -----------------------------------------------------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 31.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that it is the affairs of the victim girl with the petitioner’s son and they are in love. The girl may be minor or major that never can involve the petitioner while the victim girl in her statement under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is specific that it was Pintu who had come on her call and both of them went to Bombay after marrying and others including this petitioner has no concern with their affairs. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Bhojpur, Ara, in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. case no.137 of 2009 , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )