IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH MARCH 2008 / 22ND PHALGUNA 1929 W.A.No.593 of 2008 ---------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A.No.3070 OF 2008 IN W.P.(C).NO.5058/2008 DATED 04/03/2008 .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER:- -------------------------------------- S.R.KRISHNANKUTTY NAIR, MANAGER, K.S.M.H.S., EDAVATTAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:- ------------------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOLLAM. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOTTARAKKARA. 4. S.OMANA AMMA, H.S.A. (MATHEMATICS), K.S.M.H.S., EDAVATTAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT. R1 TO R3 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.MEERA. R4 BY ADV.SRI.M.V.THAMPAN. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:- H.L.Dattu,C.J. & K.M.Joseph,J. ---------------------------------------- W.A.No.593 of 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated, this the 12th day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu,C.J. This Writ Appeal is directed against an interim order passed by the learned Single Judge in I.A.No.3070 of 2008 in W.P.(C).No.5058 of 2008 dated 4.3.2008. 2. Normally, a Division Bench of this Court would not interfere with the interim orders and directions issued by a learned Single Judge while entertaining the writ petition unless the orders so passed are wholly perverse or contrary to the statutory provisions. 3. After hearing Sri.George Poonthottam, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, and Sri.M.V.Thampan, learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent, we do not find any error in the orders passed by the learned Single Judge on I.A.No.3070 of 2008 dated 4.3.2008. Therefore, we do not intend to entertain this Writ Appeal. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal requires to be disposed of as under: Order (i) The Writ Appeal is disposed of. (ii) Liberty is reserved to the appellant to make an appropriate application, if he so desires, for out of turn hearing of the writ petition before the learned Single Judge. W.A.No.593 of 2008 - 2 - (iii) If and when such an application is made, we request the learned Single Judge to consider the prayer made in that application in accordance with law. (iv) The respondents in the writ petition are directed to file their objections, if any, within two weeks from today, without fail. Ordered accordingly. H.L.Dattu Chief Justice K.M.Joseph Judge vku/-