^1 HIGH COURT OP CHHATTI8GARH, 9TLASPVR PBTITIONBRS RE8PONDE»nnS W.P. (81 Ko.7386 of 2007 1 Pyare 1A1 Ghritlahare, aged 40 ycars, s/o Slui Taturam, lActurerfHist) Govt. HSS Chhura District Raipur 8. Rami Bharos aged 40 years, s/o Shri Chaada Ram, Lecturer Govt. H.S.Sc, Jashpur Nagar, Jashpur CQ 3. Deepchand Korshiya, aiged 42 years, s/o Saudru Racu Korshiya, Lecturer, Govt. HSS Manpiir, District Rajnandgaon Versns 1 The State Gkwcmro.ent of CbJtiattisgarh, Through fhe Secretaiy, School Education Dcpartment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 The DMtrict Education Officer, RaJTiandgaon(CG) 3 The District Education 0£Bcer, Raipur(CG) 4 Thc District Educatiou OfBcer, Jashpur(CG) S The Director (I'ublic Instructiou) Kaiptir(CG) WmiLPE'nTION UMDBRARTICl.E 226 OFTHB COKrSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Sbri Sonikant Verma, coiinsel ftir the petitioners. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel I-awyer for the St-ate on advance copy. ORAL ORDER .2007$ (13.12.2007, SUML KUMAR SINHA. J Heard on adnnissioT). l^eamed coiinse! for tTie petitioneTs aiibmits that the petitioners have passed B.Ert. exammatioTi on ttieir own expenses, therefore, they are entitlcd to receive two advance increments accoriing to circiilars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also submits fhat in raany identical inatters, the pctitions have bcen igBowed in terms of the orier passed in the casc of ycishuxint '^ '• • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~" ~ —--—- r 2- WP(S) 7386/2007 Kiunar Bhtirewlwaf Vs. SSuniciisMll Cnrporaffon, D«tn» and eawther {3006 {01 JMPJR-CG 96?. He siibmits that fhe case ofthe petitioners is squarely covercd t>y the said judginent. This legal position is not disputed by flie lcamed counsel for fhe State. However, stie siibtnits that the onler inay be passed in terms offlie said judgmcnt, tiiit it. shall I»Rsnbjected to verificatioTi regarding petitioners' such (yialjfir^tioT). Accordingly, this wi-it pctition is aUowert in terms of the order passed in case of Yashvfani. Kujnar Bhara.rhuaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and anoiher (Supra) subje-ct to verification of the facts as to wliether the petitioners had acquired B.Ed. Exsuniiiation Ccrtificates on their own expcnses as pcr circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and fiirther whether they have heen paid two advance increineats or not. The petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Siitha Judge shyna r