IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 6654 of 2010 Date of decision: 07.04.2010 Manjeet ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sanjiv Sura, Addl. A.G. Haryana for the respondent- State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) As per the allegations in the FIR, the father-in-law, mother-in- law and husband administered poison. Whereas, during investigation, the father-in-law and mother-in-law were found to be not present at the time of occurrence and it is also admitted that the husband brought the girl to the hospital. Mr. Sanjiv Sura, Addl. A.G. Haryana, on instructions from ASI - Shamsher Singh, admits that it was the present petitioner who brought the girl to the Hospital. Thus, at this stage the story does not appear to be totally correct. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM, Rohtak. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 07.04.2010 mohan