HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No. 80 of 2011 Date 28.02.2011 Between: G.Siva Subrahmanyam Vara Prasad. ..... PETITIONER AND M.V.Subbarao and others. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri T.Rama Koteswara Rao Counsel for the Respondents : None appeared HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.80 of 2011 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 30.11.2010 in W.P.No.29921 of 2010. The petitioner filed the above mentioned Writ Petition complaining of interference with his possession of land, admeasuring Ac.0.56½ cents in Sy.No.190/4-1 of Nadikudi Village, Dachepalli Mandal, Guntur District, by the revenue officials. His case is that a DKT patta was granted in his favour in respect of the said land, that the patta is still subsisting and that he is in possession of the said land. In the light of these averments, this Court, by order dated 30.11.2010, passed an interim order in the Writ Petition directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the above mentioned land so long as the DKT patta granted in his favour continues to subsist. In this Contempt Case, the petitioner alleged that despite the said order, respondent No.1, at the instance of the other respondents, directed his subordinates to evict the petitioner and that in pursuance thereof, the subordinate staff of respondent No.1 came to the petitioner’s site, attacked and tried to dispossess him. In the counter affidavit filed by respondent No.1, it is inter alia stated that the DKT patta under which the petitioner is claiming right over the land is not genuine, that though the petitioner was in possession of the land, taking advantage of the interim order of this Court, he has put up a board stating that the land belongs to him, that the enquiries of respondent No.1 revealed that the beneficiaries, who were allotted the land, have removed the board and that neither respondent No.1 nor his subordinates interfered and removed the board. The question whether the DKT patta granted in favour of the petitioner is genuine or not cannot be adjudicated in this Contempt Case. The only issue that needs to be considered and decided in this Contempt Case is whether the respondents have wilfully violated the order of this Court or not. From the contents of the counter affidavit referred to above, it is the plea of the respondents that they are not interfering with the possession of the persons who are in occupation thereof. Therefore, I do not find any reason to proceed against the respondents in this Contempt Case. The Contempt Case is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the Writ Petition pending before this Court. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date:28.02.2011 Usd