BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16411 of 2011 K. RAVI @ KATTUVAKKAN RAVI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAILAKKAVILAI POLICE STATION, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. CR NO. 1072/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. VR. SHANMUGANATHAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as accused and he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 353 and 506(i) I.P.C. in Crime No.1072 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.Heard Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate would submit in his argument that the petitioner and one another threatened the de-facto complainant while he was on the check post duty. He would further submit that the petitioner has two previous cases and the investigation is offing and the plea of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail may not be considered. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ on his appearance before the (*)Judicial Magistrate No. I, Kuzhithurai and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the (*)Judicial Magistrate No. I, Kuzhithurai, and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioner shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 15/12/2011 (*)Amended as per the order of this court dated: 22.12.2011 in MP.2 OF 2011 by VPKJ., / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO To be substituted to the order copy already despatched: 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, NAGERCOIL. 2. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, KUZHITHURAI. 3. -DO- THRO 1 AND 2, THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAILAKKAVILAI POLICE STATION, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. VR. SHANMUGANATHAN Advocate SR.No.43898 SR : 16.12.2011 : 2P/7C DM::2012:JANUARY:03:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16411 of 2011 Date :15/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/