%«a (Kg/wk G) 1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (s) No. r5\é1?v OF 2009. (7 PETITIONER Kailash Markam, S/o. Shri Sawat Ram Markam, 'aged about 40 years, working a U.D.T. at Government Middle School Kirari, Block Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir—Champa (C. G.) w» VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1) State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary Education Department, D. K. S. Bhawan Rajpur, Distt. Raipur (C. G.) The District Education Officer, District Janjgir—Champa (C. G.) Block Education Officer, Block Akaltara, District Janjgir— Champa (C. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE £26 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ‘ s WW H1GH CQQR"? OF CHHA?T§SG£RH : BSLAS?UR WRW PETiTiG§i{$) N031 2% OF 2999 Kaiiash Markam Versus F’ET‘aTiONER RES99N$ENTS Siate of muhattisgazh & G‘mas aWri’i Petiiioi’: under Articie 226 oa‘ me Constiiutiw <3f mdia) S§ng§e Bench '. H0n‘b§e SM Satish KI Agnmmri. J. Pa‘esem :- $3M Rshwam $hukéa, counsai fer 'zhe petiiiigneaz S‘mi AV Sf§dhaa ?ane§ Lawyer few the Siate. ORDER ‘gQRAL‘é {Passed en éhés '2‘“ day ef atebmam 2m Q} ”i. wath the cmsem 9f ieamed caunsei appearmg for the games, ihe pe‘tiiion is heard finaHy. fa? the very cutse‘t, kaamed ccunsea appawing far the pemioaer submi‘is that th§s petmm is square§y covemai by thg éec§sion m th§s Csurt passed m W.P_ {S} N0.5257 of 2(308 (Sam Kant Smgh vs. State 9f Cwzait$ga¥h & Gt'ners) am prays thai simiim fe§§ef may he gramed 'm case of We graseni petiimna 3&0. 3. I Ai ihis junctm'a §eamed comma} appearang fur We 8&ate submits iheé in ihe event frw pe’migner submik‘, a deiai§e§ representaiian ihe éame sha” be comidefed anti cieciu’w, in accezfdarace Wm §aw am in view 9f the dec§s§on of th%s iiow'i z'eridered §n Saiii Kant Smgh 13‘ in v‘aew of foregoing, accardmg i6 me ieamed (mama; agapearmg far ‘k?3epe’£§iioner nothing $Liw§3ke$ m this paitiorx fin“ adjudication Awardingwi the Wm petétiom its (jismsed of. : Satish K. Agnihotr Gawz [u {wwa}, subjaci Ate verifmatien 0'?” facts. r:g ;/, Sd/ Judge i