IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.26080 of 2009 PAWAN YADAV, S/o Choket Yadav, R/o Village – Mangalpur Patni, P.S. Ramgarhwa, Distt. East Champaran …………………………… Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ………………………………… Opposite Party. ----------- For the Petitioner:- Mr. L.B. Singh, Advocate. For the State:- Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, A.P.P. ----------- 3. 07.10.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the name of the petitioner has appeared in the F.I.R. only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co- accused, who was apprehended by the scot party; however, nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He further submitted that through the petitioner is in judicial custody since 19.02.2009 but he has not been put on T.I.P. Learned counsel for the State submitted that a person, who was apprehended by the scot party after chase had named three persons including the petitioner. However, it is admitted that there is no recovery of any 2 incriminating material from the possession of the petitioner. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the petitioner, Pawan Yadav to be released on bail on his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Sugauli G.R.P.S. Case No. 6/2009, subject to the condition that one of the bailors must be the family member of the petitioner. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )