IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MRS.MANJULA CHELLUR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 6TH DECEMBER 2011 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WA.No. 1846 of 2011 ---------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.31910/2011 Dated 01/12/2011 .................... APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 2 & 3: --------------------------------------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, ERATTUPETTA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, ERATTUPETTA. 2. ABDUL SAMMAD, AGED 34 YEARS, SECRETARY, ERATTUPETTA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, ERATTUPETTA. BY ADV. SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN SRI.K.M.ANEESH SRI.V.K.PEERMOHAMED KHAN RESPONDENTS/PETTIIONER & 1st RESPONDENT: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SEBASTIAN STANESLAVOUS @ JOSHY, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.SEBASTIAN, RESIDING AT PERUMNILATHU HOUSE, ARUVITHARA P.O., ERATTUPETTA-686 122. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. R1 BY ADV.SRI.JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKAD THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Manjula Chellur, Ag. C.J. & P.R.Ramachandra Menon, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A. No. 1846 OF 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 6th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT Manjula Chellur, Ag. C.J. Heard Mr.Devan Ramachandran, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant Grama Panchayat. 2. The entire controversy in this appeal seems to be with regard to the construction of a building by the 1st respondent herein/writ petitioner, who according to the appellant, is trying to violate the licence and permission given by the appellant Panchayat by putting up the construction on a public road. Apparently, the impugned order dated 01.12.2011 was passed after hearing both the writ petitioner and the present appellant Panchayat. 3. In that view of the matter, we are of the opinion, the appellant must seek for early disposal of the matter before the learned Single Judge by bringing to the notice, how the proposed construction of the 1st respondent W.A. No. 1846 of 2011 -:2:- herein would cover up the public property and how it is in violation of the building rules. With these observations, we dispose of the writ appeal. Manjula Chellur, Ag. Chief Justice. P.R.Ramachandra Menon, Judge. ttb