IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.196 of 2010 1. BINOD KUMAR S/O ARVIND KUMAR MANDAL, R/O MOH- SAGUNA DNAPORE, PS- DANAPORE, DISTT- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE (ARMS) PATNA ----------- 02. 01.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is stated to have applied for an Arms license. It is stated to be pending consideration. Referring the I.A. No. 6397 of 2010, it is submitted that the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna on 1.9.2009, along with other applications has refused to recommend the case of the petitioner only because of the absence of his photograph on the Application Form. Without going into the question whether the petitioner had annexed the photograph or not on the Application Form, let the petitioner appear before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna along with his photograph and seek leave for appending it to the Application Form. After the petitioner furnishes his photograph, the Senior Superintendent of Police shall be at liberty to satisfy himself that the applicant who had signed the Application Form and the person whose photographs was being appended, were one and the same person, and then forward his appropriate recommendation in accordance with law to the District Magistrate within a 2 maximum period of one month from the date that the petitioner appears before the Senior Superintendent of Police. Let the licensing authority, then dispose off the petitioner’s application within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/production of the appropriate recommendation from the Senior Superintendent of Police. The application stands disposed. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)