IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23556 of 2009 1. SWAMI SATANAND @ SATANAND PANDEY, SON OF LATE ABHIRAJ PANDEY. 2. LALLAN PANDEY, SON OF LATE ABHIRAJ PANDEY 3. BHAGAWATI PANDEY, SON OF LALLAN PANDEY ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – DAHARAK, P.S. RAMGARH, DISTT. KAIMUR (BHABUA) ------ PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. BRIJNANDAN PANDEY, SON OF LATE SUKHAPAL PANDEY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – DAHARAK, P.S. RAMGARH, DISTT. KAIMUR (BHABUA) ---------- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 27.09.2010 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. From the facts of the case stated herein in the petition it appears that the petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 19.5.2009 passed by Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Kaimur (Bhabua) on the ground that earlier a case was pending between the parties as also that Police has submitted final report in the matter but cognizance was taken on the protest- cum-complaint petition. In my view, no illegality has been committed by the trial court for taking cognizance in the matter. The application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)