THE HONOURABLE SRI.JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION NO.25994 OF 2011 DATE: 21-10-2011. BETWEEN: P.RAVI KIRAN RAO .. PETITIONER AND THE JNTUH, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD REP. BY VICE CHANCELLOR AND OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS THE HONOURABLE SRI.JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION NO.25994 OF 2011 O R D E R : The following relief is sought for in this writ petition: “ For the reasons in the accompanying affidavit it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents 1 to 4 in not conducting the special examination for MBA IV semester paper-3 i.e. Compensation and Reward Management Exam to the petitioner as an extraordinary case as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 herein to conduct the special examination for MBA IV semester paper-3 i.e. Compensation and Reward Management to the petitioner as an extraordinary case, by receiving the requisite fee and other expenses from the petitioner which will incur for conducting the said exam by JNTUH, simultaneously to direct the 4th respondent herein to permit the petitioner to submit the project work of the petitioner and after announcement of the results of the petitioner by directing the respondents 1 to 4 to conduct viva preferably on or before December 2011 in protecting the precious academic year 2009-2011 of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.” The petitioner after completing his B.Tech (EEE) secured admission in the 4th respondent-Nalla Malla Reddy Engineering College, Ghatkesar to pursue M.B.A.(HR) course. He secured more than 70 % of marks in I, II and III semester examinations in M.B.A(HR). The IV semester examinations were scheduled to be held from 25.7.2011. The petitioner attended for two papers in the examinations conducted for IV semester i.e. Performance Management and Sales and Distribution Management on 25.7.2011 and 27.7.2011. The examination in the 3rd paper i.e. Compensation and Reward Management was scheduled on 29.7.2011. It is the case of the petitioner that on 29.7.2011 while he was proceeding to the examination centre to attend the 3rd paper i.e. Compensation and Reward Management he met with an accident and he was admitted in the hospital for treatment and consequently he could not attend to the examination on 29.7.2011. He approached the respondents by submitting representations dated 9.8.2011 and 5.9.2011 with a request to conduct special exam in the said paper. As the representations did not revoke any response, the petitioner has filed this writ petition for the aforesaid relief. Heard Sri.Sadu Rajeshwar Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the JNTUH and learned counsel for the 4th respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner strenuously contends that the petitioner is a brilliant student and that he passed three semesters by securing good marks and that he could not attend the examination on the scheduled date i.e. 29.7.2011 due to the accident and the same being not wanton nor wilful. He submits that in the above circumstances the respondents are under obligation to conduct the special examination for the petitioner. He also tries to impress that in case the petitioner is not permitted to attend the special examination he would lose one academic year. He also submits that the petitioner is prepared to bare the expenditure for conducting the special examination on the direction to be issued to the respondents in that regard. I have considered the aforesaid contentions of the learned counsel for the petitioner. It may be true that due to the unfortunate incident the petitioner could not attend the said examination and that the petitioner may not be responsible for such a situation, but I am unable to agree with the contention that the respondents should be directed to conduct a special examination in the said subject. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not brought to the notice of this court any provision of law wherein the respondents can be directed to conduct special examination in the present circumstances and in the absence of any such provision this court cannot issue such directions. He, however, placed reliance on Sections 27 and 43 of The Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Act, 1972. Section 27 relates to the regulation making power of the Council and the Academic Senate of the University. Section 43 is a transitional provision. A perusal of both the sections show that they have no bearing on the question relating to the conduct of special examination in the factual situation of the case. In the above said circumstances, I am of the view that the writ petition is devoid of merits and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Dt: 21-10-2011. ( NOUSHAD ALI, J ) tnb THE HONOURABLE SRI.JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION NO.25994 OF 2011 DATE: 21-10-2011.