THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.25773 OF 2005 Dated 2nd December, 2009 Between: Gampa Satyanarayana and another …Petitioners And The Superintendent of Police, Guntur And two others …Respondents The Court made the following ORDER: In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioners is that in spite of lodging a complaint against the third respondent, no action has been taken by respondents 1 and 2. As averred in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, it is the case of the petitioners that they are agriculturists and they made deposits in a scheme, which pays double the amount of deposit after three and half years, started by the third respondent. The case of the petitioners is that the third respondent even after expiry of the maturity period also did not pay the amounts to them and that they came to know that the third respondent collected huge amounts from several persons and cheated them. It is the further case of the petitioners that against the third respondent, they lodged a complaint dated 26.10.2002 before the second respondent, but no action has been taken thereon. Hence, this writ petition. On instructions, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader for Home, that on similar such complaints, nine crimes were registered against the third respondent before the CID police station and other police stations in the Districts of Mahabubnagar, Nalgonda etc. It is further submitted that so far as the complaint of the petitioners is concerned, respondents 1 and 2 have not received the same. The petitioners have not filed any material in proof of their filing the complaint dated 26.10.2002. In view of the statement of the learned Government Pleader that no complaint has been received by respondents 1 and 2 from the petitioners, it cannot be said that there is inaction on the part of respondents 1 and 2 on the alleged complaint of the petitioners. If the petitioners have any grievance, it is open to them to make an appropriate complaint/representation before the competent authority/forum. In the absence of any proof of filing of the complaint, no direction can be given in this writ petition. Subject to the above observation, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J Dated 2nd December, 2009 vrn