(Fr 10B; IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIé‘A‘rURE A'r BILASPUR Lc.G.) w. WRIT PEJITION. (S) No. $18 OF 2007 PETITIONER :- (Smt. Kishori Bai @‘Prabha Sahu W/o. Late Shri Lakla Ram Sahu, aged about 38 Years, Occupation — House wife,( Labour) R/o.’ Village — Parpoda, Post- Mohbhatta, Tahsil — Berla Distt.- Durg (C.G.) ‘ yeasus State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Panchayat and Social Department Mantralaya D.K. S. Building Raipur ( C.G.) gg§3QNDENTs /1./ \N The Director , Women and Child, Development Department Chhattisgarh Raipur, Tahsil and Distt'.- Raipur (C.G.) TheVCollector Durg, Distt.- Durg ( C.G.) The Project officer, Integrated Child, Development Berla, Vikash Khand — Berla, Distt.- Durg ( C. G. ) Chief Executive officer,Janpad Panchayat Berla, Tahsil — Berla , Distt.- Durg (C.G.) Smt. Duleshari W/o. Shri Narayan Sahu, Occupation — Aggnbadi Worker R/o. Village — Parpoda, Post- Mohbhatta, Tahsil — Berla, Distt.- Durg (C.G wRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA mw,m.m “mm VJ P (S)é7 8’07 W 200 mmwiwm aaaqmm 3.3.: HON‘BLE JUSTICE MR. PRITINKER WWAKER 14-12-2013: Shri $ur‘ti Sahu Counsel for the petitioner: S'wr. Sumesh Bajai, G A fo Nos 1 to 4 Shri Hemart Gupta couns ifor respondent No8 ' Chaiienge m the present 30.122006 {Annexure P4) pass“, respondent No.6 a5 Anganwadi Learned counsel for the axists an aitemative remedy for before the Coiiecmr assaiiing th Officey (respondent Nc.4). 3n View 0f this fact, counsi the petitioner may be permitteo to to file an appropr§ate appea: be? may be directed to be decided on expeditious§y as possible. ihe State/reepmdent rit petition is to the order dated by reepondent No.4 appointing orker. oarties fairiy submit that there the oetitionet to fiie an appeai e ordei' passed by the Ftoiect a! fat the petitioner submits that withdraw the petition with tiberty ore the Coiieotor and the same merits in accordance with iaw as W None for respondent No.5, hoogh served.‘ m HFa'a WM WW émfawm State counsei has no ob} issued for deciding the appeal of t law. is peimitted to withdraw this According!y, the petitianer petition with the iiberty as aforesaid. In the eVentuaiity of filing an . appeai by the petitioner before i within two months from today, it is to decide the same on merits ptefera'oiy within five months from by the petitioner. it is made ciear that this COL on merits of the case and the Colie the appeal in accordance with ia considering eii aspects of the case the parties. ‘ Pritinker Diwaker Judge action if any such direction is he petitioner in accordance with he Ceiiector (respondent No.3) expected from respondent No.3 as expeditiously as possibie the date of fiiing of such appeal rt has not expressed any opinion ctor would be at liberty to decide w in an obiective manner after and giving due opportunity to aii Sd/- 1”- i Ti $1 'Ei'fnzrii