1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 1957/2002 (Vishnu Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) ......... Date of Order : 17/12/2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. Shambhoo Singh for the petitioner. Mr. P.S.Chundawat for the respondents No.6 and 7. Mr. Akhilesh Agarwal, Dy.Govt.Counsel for respondent No.1 to 4. BY THE COURT By the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to consider his candidature for the post of Shiksha Sahayogi in Rajeev Gandhi Pathshala adopting the guidelines and directions given by the circular dated 30.4.2001 Annex.6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Carefully gone through the material available on record. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner applied for the four schools at Amleefala, Karmatfala, Motiamagri and Odafala for the post of Shiksha 2 Sahayogi in Rajeev Gandhi Pathshala Scheme and has not been considered for the said post. A reply to the writ petition has been filed by the respondent State stating therein that the petitioner applied only for two schools at Amleefala and Karmatfala and did not apply for the schools at Motiyamagari and Odafala. The respondents No. 6 and 7 who have been selected as Shiksha Sahayogi have been appointed at Amleefala and Karmatfala on honorarium. Since there was no application of the petitioner for two schools at Motiyamagri and Odafala, there was no reason for his consideration and the schools to which the petitioner applied, the post was reserved for a member of Scheduled Tribe and since the candidates of ST were available for the schools at Amleefala and Karmatfala, therefore, they have been considered and engaged on honorarium basis and the petitioner being not the member of ST, his case has rightly been denied consideration for those schools. From the material available on record, it nowhere appears that the petitioner applied for the schools Motiyamagri and Odafala. In this view of the matter, I do not find any merit in the writ petition. The writ petition is therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp