In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 4801 of 2008 Date of decision: May 15, 2009 Chander Parkash .. Petitioner Vs. Shanti Devi and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Dinarpur, Advocate for the respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Vineet Chaudhary, Advocate for the respondent No.4. A.N. Jindal, J The petitioner by way of an application had sought permission from the trial court to lead additional evidence for proving copy of the FIR No.346 dated 12.10.1997 as well as receipt dated 9.12.1997 with regard to the payment of Rs.6390/- through which the aforesaid money was paid with regard to the part of the crop to the respondent No.4. Neither such plea was set up by the defendant-petitioner during trial nor such suggestion was given to the plaintiff while appearing in the witness box. Moreover, the petitioner while appearing in the witness box also admitted during his cross examination that crop of kharif was got harvested by him and sale proceeds of the crop received by him were deposited in the government treasury. Now the petitioner cannot be allowed to set up such case that the crop was stolen and he had lodged the FIR in that regard and some payment was also made to the respondent No.4. No grounds to interfere in the impugned order. Dismissed. May 15, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge