IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22625 of 2009 SHAMBHU PRASAD, S/o Late Lalan Prasad. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 06. 09.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner is named in the First Information Report by the co-accused persons who had been caught at the spot and subsequently during investigation it transpired that the petitioner had complicity in the matter, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it in view of the serious nature of the offence. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)