«1. aé ,/ 0'5 ‘ \0 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. WRIT PETITION No. €45 [2005 pETITIQNER Kashyap, about 28 years (presently 51 years), son of Ram Khilawan Kashyap, occupation — Ex—adhoc Assistant Teacher, Government Primary School, East Takhatpur, // Mahettar Lal Bhadam, (Chhattisgarh), resident of viliage Papatiyakaia, Post Tanda, Ganiyari, Tah. Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). / 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Secretary, through : the Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) Shikshan Bhawan, The Director, Sanchainalay, A D.K.S. Raipur (CG) /3. The Coilector, Bilaspur (CG) The District Education Officer, Education Distt. (Chhattisgar) The State of Madhya Pradesh the through Secreta ry, Department of Education, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) / OF INDIA WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 2261227 OF THE CONSTITUTION h XI-HC—78 ‘ :«.>r) .o..oo‘ No Wmww“ WW,W,W @Hf mmvmww mmmm , mmaearem I emm 10.03.2005 Shri A.N.Bhakta. counsel for the petitioner. Shri U»N.S. Deo, Govt. copy. Application (I.A.No. 1332 Heard. The main grievance of th original application No. 1429/97 Tribunai, has not been received The present petitioner is one of the applicants before the Tribunal. Learned counsel for the petitioner, makes a limited prayer tha presently the records of the said original application be called or transferred from the State Admii as early as possible and the matt .Iaw. Counsel for the petitioner s1 listrative Tribunal, bench at Raipur. er be disposed of in accordance with Ibmits that since the S.A.T. has been abolished, there is no impediment in transfen‘ing the matter to this Court as the matters are to be transferred in a routine manner‘ State Counsel does not )ppose the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitionei‘i.. > ‘The prayer is allowed. Let the records of O.A. No.1429/1997 be transferred to the High Court from S.A.T., Raipur. The petition stands finally Cei‘tifled copy as per rules. J disposed olii ,i h Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha udge o.~;3&o.. W 200 3/ Advocate. for the State on advance ‘ ’2005) for urgent hearing is allowed. a petitioner is that the records 0% the filed before the State Administrative or transferred to this Court till date. t