CRM- M 23969 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M 23969 of 2011 Date of decision : November 21, 2011 Mohit Chauhan, ...... Petitioner v. The State of Haryana, ...... Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Gorakh Nath, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG Haryana *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in case FIR No.27, dated 24.4.2011, registered under Sections 392, 467, 468, 471, 473, 216-A, 420 of the IPC, and Section 25 of the Arms Act, at Police Station Sector 20, Panchkula. On 9.8.2011, the following contention was noticed :- “ Learned counsel has argued that there is no legal evidence of the allegation that he had provided arms and ammunition to the main accused Anil Kumar and the petitioner has been in custody since 20.6.2011.” On a couple of dates thereafter, it was brought out that the matter was fixed for evidence and it would be appropriate to await the CRM- M 23969 of 2011 ::2:: hearing. However, today it has been alleged by counsel for the petitioner, and in fact accepted by counsel for the respondent on instructions from SI Deepak Kumar, that even charge has yet not been framed in this case. In these circumstances, without commenting upon the merits of the case and keeping in view the period of custody of the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner. Bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, Panchkula. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) November 21, 2011. JUDGE `kk'