r^^^^- s^. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURB CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Sing^e Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. WMT PBTITION N0. 1539 OF 2001 Petitioner Versus Respondents :1. CISPNo, 824430081 S.R. Raghuvanshi S/o Late Har Narayan Raghuvaashi, Aged about 42 years, Head Constable Central Industdal Security Force Unit - Bhilai Steel Plant, Bhilai -01, Distnct Dwg (C.G.). Union of India Through-Secretaiy, Miaistry of Hoiae Govt, of India, New Delhi. 2. Coniuiandant Ceritral Industrial Security Force, Unit - Bhilai Steel Plant, Bhilai-01, District Durg (C.G.). 3. CISFNo.961401993 Constable V.S. Poswal, Bhilai Steel Plant, Bhilai, TahsU and District Durg (C.G.). Present: Shri V.G. Tamaskar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri S. K. Beriwal, Standing counsel for the respondents. ORAL ORDBR (5th January, 2006) Heaid. 1. Learaed coiinsel for fhe petitioner submits fhat fhe enquiry pursuaat to fhe Charge-sheet (Memo) No. V-15014/Estt- 3/Major-10/2001/466 dated 16.6.2001 has been concluded. .^^i-^SS.^-- .——^.— (&; The petitioner had participated ia the departaiental enquiry. However, ia the view offhe order dated 27.9.2001 passed by fhis court directiag fhat "no final order shall be issued as a result of departinental enquiry>?, fhe final order has not been passed. 2. In view of fhe fact that on fhe basis of charge-sheet, which is unpugned here, fhe departniental enquiry has already been concluded, at fhis stage, it is not necessaiy to quash fhe charge-sheet, which is impugned ia this writ petition. The respondents raay pass fuial order ia fhe departmental enquiry. The petitioner is granted Uberty to question fhe fiadiags of the departniental enqiiiry as well as the order passed pursuant to fhe departaiental enquiry, if so advised. 3. For fhe reasons stated above, fhe petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Bablu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^7^