IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13886 of 2011 UMESH YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 467, 468/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against two accused persons that they were given the benefit of “Indira Awas Scheme” in 1998-99 but right now in the employment and their names are not in the B.P.L. List. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that benefits under the Scheme were given in 1998-99 to the father and wife of petitioner, when they were under the B.P.L. List. Hence, for the benefits conferred under the Scheme in 1998- 99 the case has been lodged in 2011 when at the relevant time the beneficiaries were in the B.P.L. List. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender 2 before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 232 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Darbhanga, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)