IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.27254-M of 2008 Date of Decision:29.7.2010 Pawandeep Singh @ Sonu and others .... Petitioners Versus Balaur Singh and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Surinder Gandhi, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 states that since the petitioners have been acquitted, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 29.7.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE