IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27281 of 2006 SURENDRA SAHANI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 15. 29.6.2010. Heard Sri Umakant Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the order dated 18.2.2006 passed in Sessions Trial No.690 of 2005 by learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Motihari. After having perused the order, I do no find that the order suffers from any illegality, as such, the petition is dismissed. However, during the course of his submissions Sri Umakant Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner vented his grievance that the petitioner was originally the informant of Darpa P.S.Case No.9 of 2004 and in that case a final form has been submitted by the police but the S.D.J.M., Raxaul at Motihari is not passing any order either on final form or on the protest petition. I could recommend the S.D.J.M. Raxaul at Motihar to go through Bhagwant Singh Vrs. Commissioner of Police, Delhi in (1983)3 SCC 344 and act accordingly to pass an order on final form/protest petition in one month’s time from the date of receipt/production of the copy of the present order. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar , J.)