// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.271/2007 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9681/2006 {Mrs. Vimla Vs. Shri Shekhar Dutt and Others} Date of Order ::: 14.05.2009 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Dr. Prakash Chandra Jain, Counsel for petitioner Shri Sanjay Pareek, Counsel for respondent No.3 Shri Dinesh Yadav, Counsel for respondent No.4 #### By the Court:- Shri Sanjay Pareek and Shri Dinesh Yadav, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.3 and 4 respectively, contended that although retiral benefits have been prepared and paid by way of deposit in SB Account of respondent No.4, but respondent No.4 has not withdrawn the said amount. Learned counsel for respondent No.4 further undertakes that respondent No.4 will not withdraw the amount till disposal of Writ Petition No.9681/2006, however, he prayed that the amount is lying in SB Account carrying lower rate of interest and in case the same is ordered to be deposited in Fixed Deposit it may fetch higher rate of interest and there may not be any loss of interest. The prayer appears to be // 2 // reasonable. The Bank is directed to deposit the amount, in dispute, in Fixed Deposit initially for a period of two years, which will be extended from time to time in case the writ petition is not disposed of. The said deposited amount with interest so accrued thereon will be subject to final disposal of the writ petition. Learned counsel for petitioner is satisfied with the statement of learned counsel for respondents No.3 and 4 and, in view thereof, does not press the contempt petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. Notice of contempt stands discharged. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//