IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 631 of 2006. Date of decision: 17.9.2008. Gopal Mohan Aggarwal & Anr. … Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. … Respondents Coram : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners: Mr. Viveka Nand Negi vice Mr. Pankaj Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate General. Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral): By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have basically challenged the notification by which tourists vehicles have been restrained from plying on restricted and sealed roads on the basis of permits issued under the earlier notification applicable to sealed and restricted roads in the town of Shimla. It is not disputed that these notifications have ceased to operate due to coming into force of the Shimla Road Users & Pedestrians (Public Safety and Convenience) Act, 2007. In case the petitioners have any grievance now, they will have to challenge the provisions of the Shimla Road Users & Pedestrians (Public Safety and Convenience) Act, 2007. Therefore, this petition has become infructuous and is disposed of accordingly with liberty to the 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 petitioners to take appropriate steps to redress their grievances, if any in respect of the Shimla Road Users & Pedestrians (Public Safety and Convenience) Act, 2007. CMP No. 1043 of 2006: In view of the orders passed in the main petition, this application is rejected. ( Deepak Gupta ), Judge ( V.K. Ahuja ), September 17, 2008 Judge (BSS) 3