IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 6482 of 2005. Date of Decision: 30th March, 2009. Rajeev Kumar Petitioner through Mr. C.M.Munjal, Advocate Versus Santosh Rani Respondents through R.K.Girdhar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) This Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 21.10.2005 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Ferozepur whereby an appeal filed by the respondent against the order passed by the Additional Civil Judge[Senior Division], Jallalabad declining application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC, has been accepted. Notice of motion was issued and in response thereto, learned counsel for the respondent has put in appearance. While admitting this revision petition on 10.1.2006, operation of the impugned order was stayed. The interim order dated 10.1.2006 is operating from last more than three years and the parties have reconciled with the same. It is stated by learned counsel for the parties that though the suit has not been decided so far, but the same is at the verge of conclusion. Since the interim order is operating from last more than three years, in my considered view, there is no need to go into the rival contentions of the parties. Rather, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the revision petition with a direction that the interim order as granted by this Court shall continue to operate till the civil suit is decided. Nothing said in the impugned order as also this order shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. Disposed of. March 30, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE