IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2939 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.05.2011 Sumeet Dhingra . . .Petitioner Versus Smt. Santosh Gupta . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Promila Nain, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the revision petition has become infructuous because landlord has taken forcible possession. Be that as it may, revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MAY 06 , 2011 JUDGE vivek