IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN : PRESENT : THE HON’BLE SMT.JUSTICE : T.MEENA KUMARI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 1062 of 2000 (Criminal Revision case under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. against the Order of the Court of the V Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur dated 12.09.2000, in Crl.MP No.2566/2000 in CC No.278/97.) Between: V. Venkateswara Reddy, Branch Manager, Andhra Bank. Petitioner/A-4 (Accused) AND 1.Gottipati Niyananda Kumar, S/o Narasimha Swamy, R/o Guntur Town. 2.State of A.P. rep. by Public Prosecutor. Respondents The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed herein and the order of the High Court dated 26.09.2000 made in Crl.MP No.5797 of 2000 and upon hearing the arguments of Sri C. Praveen Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following ORDER: “The record shows that notice on respondent No.1 still remains unserved. Sri C. Padmanabha Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner sought liberty of this Court to take out notice through substituted service. Accordingly, Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to take out notice through substituted service to the Respondent No.1 by way of publishing the same in the District Edition of Enadu Telugu daily of Guntur District within a period of four weeks from today intimating the date of hearing as 21-3-2007. Post on 21-3-2007.” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1.The V Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur. 2.Gottipati Niyananda Kumar, S/o Narasimha Swamy, R/o Guntur Town. 3.Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court Bldgs., Hyderabad.(OUT) 4.One CC to Sri C. Praveen Kumar, Advocate. (OPUC) 5.One spare copy. H.A. DRAFTED BY : H.A. DATED : 01.02.07 APPROVED BY : HIGH COURT TMKJ DATED : 24-01-07 NOTE : POST ON 21.03.07 ORDER : CRL.RC NO.1062/2000 DIRECTION