C.R. No. 28 of 2009 8.9.2009 Present:- Mr. K.D.Sood, Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Sood, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, counsel for the respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that one of the point involved in the revision petition is whether the correction is to be made under Sections 152 and 153 of the Code of Civil Procedure by the trial Court or by the first appellate Court. The learned counsel for the petitioners has relied Maldar Mahaboob Sab and others Vs. Allabakash AIR 2004 Andhra Pradesh 193 and submitted that in the event of reversal, the correction if any, is to be made by the first appellate Court under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure and not by the trial Court. The learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the trial Court had dismissed the suit and the first appellate Court had decreed the suit which was upheld by the High Court. The learned counsel for the respondent has fairly stated that in view of Maldar Mahaboob Sab (supra), the necessary correction was required to be carried by the first appellate Court and not by the trial Court. Accordingly the revision is allowed. The order dated 14.1.2009 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No.1, Hamirpur in CMA No. 4 of 2008 is set-aside with liberty to respondent to approach the appropriate court for carrying out necessary corrections. The petitioners shall be at liberty to contest the said application, if filed, on all grounds available in law. The revision petition stands disposed of. CMP No. 92 of 2009 Infructuous. (Kuldip Singh) Judge. September 8, 2009. (GR)