/s-^ e^Yai IN THE HIGH OF JUDICATURE. AT - BILASPUR fC.G.) Sinslfi •'' CONTEMPTPETITIONNO. ) 2-& OF 2004 BETWEEN ^•-^ ^g^ ^•''" "<•'" ^ •A(-<^ PETITIONER APPLICANT Ih- << ...r! y ^ -.''•^'€^'^•''1 J\ ^^^. \0 "^ B.D.BERWANSHI AGED-50YEARS, SON OF SHRI LADU RAM BERWANSffl POSTED AS - OFFICIATING DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, AT - RAJNANDGAON RESmENT OF RAJNANDGAON (C.G.) ^/ VERSUS RESPONDENTS CONTEMNERS ^•?-s^"s; ^*i"'1'^; y v9 .^ '^8 •\''' '^ ^ •f'<Si • ^ tS. .* . ? rfn ^ "• .' 2. < DR. ALOK SHUKLA SECRETARY STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT MANTRALAYA, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR SMT. J. RANGARI PRINCIPAL, GOVT. HR. SEC.SCHOOL, TUMBIBOD, DISTRICT - RAJNANDGAON AT PRESENT WORKING- OFFICIATING DISTMCT EDUCATION OFFICER, AT- RAJNANDGAON (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER SECTION - 2 (b) AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT. 1971 XI-HC—78 ^TFfi^pT, i»y1yii<e, ^(-iiyy ,.(^4....^;..!.^./^.. Sfl^T^iI K-Uv ^TaTT 3TK?I @-^jch ^ww'Bfsg 3ii^i qirqfwft-T wqcff ii fest'rfSn^i ^sTfOTan^ TRFTT3W Shri M.K. Bhaduri, Coun^el for the peMtioner. SIiri Akhil ^rawal, Panel |Lawyer for the State. Heard. Lcamed counsel for fhe ^etitioner submits fhat the petitioner was teaasferred. He also subnjiite that the petitioner filed the writ petition bearu^ No.3344/2004 jwhich was disposed ofby this Court vide order dated 29-9-2004 with a direction to the petitifaier to aaatee a detailed representation raisin^ authorily of fhe respondents aSpmg wifh a copy of tlie petition and the order, withiu 10 days, aad the sanie shaU be considered respoadents on its own merits It is submitted fhat the his grieva&ces before thc competent on such represcntati©nbcing fited, by the coinpctent aufhority of fhe ia accordance wifh law, as eariy as possible preferabty within six v|eeks fix>iu the date of receipt cS the representation. jtittoner submitted fhe representation before the coiapetent authorily ^withm the stipulated period, but fhe same has not been declded so fer. Leamed couasel for Ae petittoner submltted that fhe non-consid^radon of thc representatloa withia the stipulated period as directed by fhls Court aaaounts to contentpt for violation of fh.e order. I Haviug considered the facfs and circumstances ofltie case and the material on record, iaste^d of proceeding for contempt for violation of fhe dlrection. of th^ Coiirt, for the time being aids of .justice wffl be served ifa dirccti4n is given to fhe pctitioiier to make a XI-HC—78 ^-Sf ^ll^ld^^ •afliy'KS, [sidl-Hy (vtl SITOT^ Wl* a'a!I 3nt?T'SiIIW Hande/- WWTWBft^an^l - 2 •*Mh^ ITOCT <f feet TfSRSR ^sifinw^ fcsh representation within 15 d^ys alongwlth a copy of this order before tlie coiupetent authority o^fhe respondents, who shaU decide the same positferely wittun jsix wecks froin tfae date of receipt/production of fhe repres^ntatton. Non-compliance shaU be viewed veiy seriousty. | Wifh fhe aforesajd observajtions, tfae petition stauds disposed of. Certified copy as pcr rules. Copy to the State couasel fi^r coiapliaace. t.a^ru e