IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8299 of 2008 HEM KANT JHA Versus THE UNION OF INDIA THRU.CBI. ----------- 9. 16.7.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the C.B.I. Allegation against the petitioner is that in conspiracy with branch Manager of Oriental Insurance Company, he misappropriated an amount of Rs 20320/- of household articles bearing Claim No. 48/2003/21 though no such policy is taken by him. The claim was bogus and fabricated. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has already made claim from the Company relating to his policy of motorcycle as such when cheque amount of Rs 20320/- was handed over to him, he accepted and deposited it in his account. Counsel appearing for the C.B.I. submits that forgery is apparent from the demand draft which was issued in the name of H.K. Jha, there was no address in the policy. In spite of that, the petitioner accepted it, got his name changed and deposited it in his account. I find that conspiracy is there. Therefore, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. AKV/ (Mridula Mishra,J.)