@ BEFORE HON BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BmASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No W51 /2009 smgh enc / ETITIONER Saimun Nisha, wife of late Shrl S'arajuddin’ Solanki aged a years R/o Ward No6 Gandal D trlct Ralnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS ESPONDENT : 1. / State Of Ch‘hattisgarh; «h Through: the’SeCretary, ”Urban Administration an Department, D.K.S.’Raipur d R ( / COIlector Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G. 3. ‘/,Nagar Panchayat, Gandaij Through: Chief Municipa Gandai, District Rajnandga g\. . 2’ The President, v _ Nagar Panchayat, Gandai, ' District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 5. Ashwin Tamrakar, Presiden Nagar Panchayat, Gandai,, District Rajnandg’a‘on (C.G.') WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONS ! . r ‘ OF INDIA The above named Petitioner respectfully submits as ”unde r' / 1. PARTICULARS‘OF PETITIONER A h P b ) O l t " TI HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISI§ARH AT BIL SPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 4497 of 2009 Sajmun Nisha wife of Late Shri Sarajuddjn (Solanik, aged about 26 years, r/o Ward No. 6 y Gandai, Distn'ct Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ’ VERSUS I RESPONDENTS :, 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, " Urban ’ Administration and Welfare Department, D.K.S. Raipur (C.G.) ‘ 2. Collector Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) I. I 3. Nagar gan‘chayat Gandai, Through Chief Municipal omcer Gandai, District RaJnandgaon (C G) 4. The Presxdent, Nagar Panchayat, Gandal " Distinct Rajnandgaon (CG) 5. Ashwm Tamrakar, Presulent, Nagar Panchayat, Gandai, District Rajnandgaon (CG) VRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF @Q A SB Hon’ble Shri satish K. Agnihotri, J PETITIONER Present Shn Anup Majumdar Advocate for the petmoner Shn Shashank Thaknr Pane} Lawyer for the State/reepondents l & 2 1 ORDER ORAL) (Passed on 04 day of September, 2009) ’ 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner 'on instructions submits that the petmoner does not want to contest the petmon on meats at thls stage however prays that the State/respondents may be directed to oonmder and demde the proposal made by the respondent—Nagar I’anchayat expedmously ~ / Leamed counsel appeanng for the State/respondents 1 and 2 submits that 1f there 1s any proposal made by the respondent-Nagar Panchayat, the same will be considered as early as possible. In view of the above according to learned counsel appearing or the petitioner nothing survwes for adjudicao 4. Accordmgl, the petition is disposed of y Sd/- r i I Satish K. Agnihotri Judge \99\epl , ‘ v , f tin ‘