- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3194 OF 2008 ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ Mr.Ajay D. Magdum for the ¦ Petitioners. ¦ Mr.G.H.Keluskar for the ¦ Respondent No.1 ¦ Mr.Prakash Mahadik for Respondent ¦ No.3. ¦ ¦ CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA , J. ¦ DATED: 26TH NOVEMBER, 2008 P.C.: The Petitioner has challenged the finding given by the courts below, whereby after considering the material available on record, including the fact that the building in question is in dilapidated condition and as stated is more than 90 years old, and at any stage/any time that can/will cause damage to the life of general public. Once there is a finding given that the - 2 - building becomes dangerous and there is possibility of causing damages, I see no reason to interfere with the same finding given by courts below. 2. The submission that there was no proper notice given to the tenant though raised, just cannot be a reason as admittedly, prior notice itself was given to the landlord long back with regard to dilapidated condition of the premises. 3. Taking all this into account, I see no reason to interfere with the order. Petition is dismissed. Status-quo granted earlier stands vacated. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)