IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2009 / 6TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 10056 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.SURENDRAN, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.MADHAVAN, RESIDING AT `SUBINA', 4/4799, A.G.ROAD, CALICUT-32. BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPINATH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MANAMCHIRA, CALICUT. 2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE II, CALICUT. 3. THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER, RANGE I, CALICUT. 4. THE BRANCH MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, BRANCH III, CALICUT. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, IT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.3.2009 , THE COURT ON 27/03/2009 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M. JOSEPH, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 10056 OF 2009 B ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 27th day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner challenges Ext.P6 and seeks a direction to consider and pass orders on Ext.P10. The petitioner is working as a Development Officer in the Life Insurance Corporation of India. There was a litigation which ultimately culminated against the petitioner. Of course, it is stated to be at the instance of the association of which the petitioner was a member. Ext.P1 is the interim order passed by this court. The amount was deducted but put kept in the suspense account. Now there is a demand for interest. Petitioner filed Ext.P10. 2. I heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel. I feel that a decision can be ordered to be taken on Ext.P10. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P10 in accordance with law within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such a decision is taken, proceedings pursuant to Ext.P6 will be kept in abeyance. I leave open all the contentions of the petitioner. (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) aks