IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 10047 of 2011 Date of decision August 4, 2011 Ravinder Singh ....... Petitioner Versus The Union of India and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Vipul Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Maharaj Kumar, Advocate for the respondents. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. The issue in this writ petition relates to a dispute of date of birth as relied on by the petitioner and which is furnished to the Passport Authorities on the basis of which a passport has also been issued. The question of fact cannot be an adjudication in the writ jurisdiction and the petitioner will have the same remedy before a Civil Court of competent jurisdiction. 2. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the remedy in an appropriate forum. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 4, 2011 archana