IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 24.08.2010 COCP No.1658 of 2010 Ram Kumar and others ...Petitioners Versus Vikas Gupta ...Respondent Present: Mr. S.K.Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The grievance of the petitioners is that the mutation in favour of the Gram Panchayat has been set aside in view of Full Bench judgment of this Court reported as Jai Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana and others 2003(2) PLR 658, but the petitioners have not been recorded as owners. The petitioners have a right to seek establishment of rights under the Punjab Village Common Land (Regulation) Act, 1961 or from by such other remedy as may be available to them. But it cannot be said that such order give rise to a civil contempt within the meaning of Section 2 (c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Dismissed. 24.08.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE