11.wp.1686-10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION [1] WRIT PETITON NO.1686 OF 2010 Shivaji Balu Jagtap. ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra and others. ..Respondents. WITH [2] WRIT PEITION NO.1692 OF 2010 Pandurang Nathu Mhetre. ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & others. ..Respondents. WITH [3] WRIT PEITION NO.1693 OF 2010 Madhukar Laxman Jana. ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & others. ..Respondents. WITH [4] WRIT PEITION NO.1694 OF 2010 Prakash Rohidas Waghmare. ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & others. ..Respondents. 11.wp.1686-10 2 WITH [5] WRIT PEITION NO.1695 OF 2010 Rajendra Dattatraya Landge. ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & others. ..Respondents. WITH [6] WRIT PEITION NO.1696 OF 2010 Satish Pandurang Mohite. ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & others. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Ajay A. Basutkar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr.S.R. Nargolkar, AGP, for Respondent No.1 - State. Mr.Sanjay Udeshi, Advocate i/b. Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for Respondent Nos.2 & 3. .... CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : MARCH 10, 2010. P.C. 1. The learned Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 & 3, on instructions, states that the representations of the petitioners, copy of which is at Exhibit-B to each Petition, shall be considered by respondent No.2 in accordance with law and orders thereon shall be passed and communicated to the 11.wp.1686-10 3 petitioners as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of six weeks from today. Statement is accepted. In view of this statement, Petitions are permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of as such. (D.K. DESHMUKH,J.) (A.R. JOSHI, J.)