S!NGLE 8EWGR C^ }^^_ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) WRIT PETITION fS) N0. h^^~_ OF 2011 PETITIONER \-< ^% <0</.-\"^-T/1 ^•^y'^ ^';yN>*"r y^ RESPONDENTS .^ • ^ y^^ ^^... ^ Rabinsondas Manghoghar, S/o Shri J.D. Manghoghar, aged about 52 years, Principal, Government High School, Hardi, Khektara, Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) At Present R/o Om Nagar, Jharhabhata, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, Schoot Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) / 2. District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ^3. Btock Education Officer, Lormi, DistrictBilaspur (C.G.) ,4. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA __-—.--l—.———r ^7 .^^ ,'' a^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (Hon, Mr Justice Pritinker Diwaker). W.P.(S)No. 4377 of 2011 Petitloner Rabinsondas Manghoghar VERSUS Respondents State of Chhattisaarh and others Prssent: Shri Prakash h.4jshra, counsei for the petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, PL forthe State. OBJDE_R (18.S8.2811) Learned counset for the petitjoner submits that the petitioner js entitied to benefit of two advance increments on account of he having passed B.Ed. examlnation in the year 1989 before his appointment at his own cost. !t is submitted that the issue involved in the present petition is no longer res integra and the same has been finally decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena vs. State of M.P. & Ors. 2009 (III) IVJPJR (SC) 59. 2. It is further submitted that this Court has afso taken a simiiar view in Its order dated 06.02.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No.6257/2008. Learned counsei for the petitioner further submits that the order dated 29.04.2010 passed in Writ Appeal No. 124/2009, wherein relying upon the judgment ofthe Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) and the order passed by this Court in another Writ Appeal No.87/2009, directions have been issued tor consideration of the case for grant of two advance increments as per circuiar dated 13.09.1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after verification of the facts pleaded in the petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that the case of the petitloner would also be considered on the same lines. -^^ ^ ^y^l ^j ''^r' .^ ^- v 4. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to decide the ctaim of the petitioner for grant of two advance increments as per circular dated 13.09.1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after verification of the facts pleaded in the petition within a period of four months from today. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concemed would be at iiberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge