IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2356 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO. 2356 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO. 2356 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.3745 OF 2003 NO.3745 OF 2003 NO.3745 OF 2003 Parshuram Govind Chougule ...Plaintiffs. vs. Ramesh Kedari Chougule and anr. ....Defendants. Mr. Ditendra Mishra for the plaintiffs. None for the defendants. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. NOVEMBER NOVEMBER NOVEMBER 13, 2006. 13, 2006. 13, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support, I am inclined to grant the plaintiffs an opportunity to be heard on merits. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to the plaintiff paying costs fixed at Rs.4,500/- within a period of two weeks from today to the defendant. 2. Further, the Notice of Motion shall be heard in normal course. sd/- (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J)