SBCMA No.1136/07 Gopal Lal Vs. Hamid Ali @ Abdul Rahim Khan & Ors. -{1}- S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1136/2007 Gopal Lal vs Hamid Ali @ Abdul Rahim Khan & ors. DATE OF ORDER : - 11.9.2008 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Manish Pitaliya, for the appellant. Mr.Manoj Bohra, for the respondents. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties. The appellant is aggrieved against the less award of the damages to the appellant by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nimbaheda by award dated 24.8.2006. The appellant claimed compensation of Rs.7,65,000/- whereas the tribunal awarded the compensation of Rs.18,000/-. As per the facts of the case, the accident occurred on 13th Sept., 1997 and appellant suffered one fracture in the accident. The FIR was submitted after delay of one month and six days on 6th Nov., 1997. The appellant obtained disability certificate Ex.9 from the doctor which is dated 14th SBCMA No.1136/07 Gopal Lal Vs. Hamid Ali @ Abdul Rahim Khan & Ors. -{2}- Oct., 2005. The tribunal considered the facts in detail about the claim of the appellant and awarded compensation of Rs.2,500/- against the expenses incurred by the appellant for his treatment, Rs.1,000/- for travailing expenses, Rs.1,500/- for diet, Rs.8,000/- for fracture in right leg and Rs.3,000/- on account of loss of income and further awarded Rs.2,000/- on account of his future difficulties. In total Rs.18,000/- has been awarded as compensation. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the tribunal committed error of law by ignoring the disability certificate on the ground that it was obtained after so many years. It is submitted that disability certificate of the year 2005 prove the fact that the disability has not cured even after passing of more than seven years. I considered the submissions of learned counsel for the appellant and perused the record. It is clear from the facts that appellant came with absolutely vague facts as well as gave vague evidence and even then the tribunal has awarded various amounts in various heads in total Rs.18,000/-. Looking to the injury of the appellant and its SBCMA No.1136/07 Gopal Lal Vs. Hamid Ali @ Abdul Rahim Khan & Ors. -{3}- defect, I do not find that the tribunal has committed any error in awarding Rs.18,000/- only to the appellant nor it can be said to be an amount low looking to the injury suffered by the appellant. Hence, the appeal of the appellant is hereby dismissed having no merit. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-