1 Cri. Application No.5171/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5171 OF 2010 Sindhubai w/o Kakasaheb Jadhav & ors. ... APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & anr. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri N.G. Shah, Advocate for the applicants Shri V.H. Dighe, A.P.P. for the respondents ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 24th January, 2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard. On 14.12.2010, application for pre-arrest bail moved by applicant No.2 Ashok and applicant No.3 Sheshrao is rejected, while other accused – applicant Nos.1 and 4 to 8 are concerned, interim protection was granted which is in force. There is no grievance of any overt act or influence exerted by the accused/ applicants herein. Learned A.P.P. submits, the nature of injuries suffered by Kondiram and Lahanubai informs of brutality in the nature of assault, grievous injuries are caused and hence, according to him, the accused do not deserve pre-arrest bail. 2. Having gone through the F.I.R., I find the role attributed 2 Cri. Application No.5171/2010 to the applicant Nos.1 and 4 to 8 is very minimal. Some of them have inflicted fist blows. There is no element of any instigation on or at the behest of these applicants. Even full names are not attributed in the F.I.R. The controversy relating to immovable property is surfacing between Kakasaheb and Suryabhan. Kakasaheb Jadhav has suffered the brunt being enjoyed custody and subsequently released on bail. In the above matrix of the matter, the ad-interim relief granted to applicant Nos.1 and 4 to 8 is made absolute. They would be causing appearance before the investigator whenever so needed, shall not influence the witnesses, nor coerce them. Application allowed. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/cri5171.10