hggfga Eé‘mmgaa :N THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmsGARH AT BILAsPUR me.) w.P. (s) No. ?‘6Li/ /2ou / Ramcharan Rafr‘e S/o Shri Gopilal Rafre, Aged about 44 years, Lecfurer, Government Higher Secondary Schod! Semarfal, Bilha Disff. Bilaspur' (C.G.) RESPONDENTS : 1/ S‘rafe of Chhaffisgarh Through Secrefary, School Educafion Deparfmgm‘ D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 22/ Districf Educa’n'on Officer Bitqspur (C.G.) i The Principle Government Higher Secondary School, Semarfai, Disff. Biiaspur (C.G.) Joint Direcfor, Treasury Account & Pension Biiaspur Disff. Bilaspur (ca) ‘ wRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITuTION OF INDIA J HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRI’I‘INKER DIWAKER W.P.fSi.N0. 7541/2011 PETITEO'NER Ramcharan Ratre Vel‘SUS RESPONDENTs State of Chhattisgarh 85 Others Shri K.S.Pawar, counsel for the patitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, P‘L‘ for the Statel WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (13. 12.2011) Grievance, of the petitioner in this petition is that though he is entitled to receive two advance increments pufsuant to passing of B.Ed course, the same has not been granted to him. Counsel for the petitioner submits that his case is squarely covered with number of decisions passed by this Court including the one in the matter of Asha Saxena Vs. State of M.P. &. Others, 2099 (III) MPJR (SC) 59 (Annexure P/ 5)‘ He submits that in View of this judgment besides many others, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation before respondent NO.3, raising all his grievances. Counsel for the petitioner also craves for a direction to the competent authority to decide the said representation as expeditiously as possible. Counsel for the State also assures that representation if any made by the petitioner, shall be decided in accordance with law, as early as possible. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. However, if the petitioner makes a representation within one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the competent authority shall decide the same within a further period of two months from the date of its receipt in accordance with law. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. .mt r V Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge