Crl. Misc. No.M-18625 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-18625 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 6, 2010 Akhruzzma Khan …..Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Namit Sharma, Advocate and Mr. A.K.Bura, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner seeks the concession of regular bail in a case registered at the instance of Mukesh alleging that his real brother Varinder had gone on June 27, 2009 at 11.00 a.m. to Panipat for his personal work but he did not return. The petitioner alongwith others is alleged to have good relations with Varinder Singh. The petitioner had been absented from Crl. Misc. No.M-18625 of 2010 [2] the factory alongwith others after the disappearance of the brother of the complainant. Petitioner is not named in the FIR for having kidnapped Varinder Singh. Though the prosecution was launched on the basis of a complaint under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. not specifying naming the petitioner but during the course of investigation the name of the petitioner was allegedly disclosed by his co-accused. It will be a moot point during trial whether on the basis of uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice, the petitioner would be convicted. The petitioner has been in custody since February 15, 2010. Co- accused of the petitioner had already been granted the concession of bail under Section 167 (2) Cr.P.C. Without expression of any opinion on merits of the case, the petition is allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds/ surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. September 6, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE