IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 168 of 2010 Decided on: 27.4.2011 Gurdhian Singh and others …Petitioners Versus Vidya Devi and others …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioners : Mr. K.D. Sood, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Adarsh K. Vashishta, Advocate. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Adarsh K. Vashishta, Advocate appearing on behalf of respondents undertakes that no construction activity shall be carried out in the disputed premises, save and except with the prior permission of the Court. The undertaking is accepted. The Station House Officer, Kangra is directed to ensure that the undertaking given before this Court is implemented in letter and spirit. He is further directed to file monthly reports before this Court regarding implementation of the undertaking. The petitioner shall personally apprise the SHO, Kangra of this order for its due and punctual compliance. 2 In view of the aforesaid observations/directions, the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- present contempt petition is disposed of. Notices issued to respondents are discharged. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge April 27, 2011 (K. Attri)