1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6139 OF 2009 (Bhausaheb s/o Murlidhar Gondkar and another vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr. S.B.Talekar, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. R.P.Phatake, Additional G.P., for respondent State. Mr.Mr. N.D.Sonawane, Adv., h/f Mr. V.D.Hon, Advocate, for respondent no.4. CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE :6th NOVEMBER, 2009. 1. In reply to communication made by the Desk Officer, dt.10th July, 2008 ( Exh.F), to the Deputy Director, Town Planning, Nashik Region, Nashik, a report dt.21st Jan.,2009, has been submitted to the Director, Town Planning, Maharashtra State, Pune and, according to learned Additional Government Pleader, a copy thereof is placed before us. 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders 2. Learned A.G.P. further submits that, based on this report, the State would take a final decision on the issue raised by the petitioners within four weeks. In view of above statement, petition stands disposed of. [K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] [NARESH H.PATIL, J.] ... agp/wp6139-09