:sa&i ^ ^ IN THE mGH COURT OFTUDICATURE AT BILASPUR GHHATHSGARH W.F.NO. S81-5" /Z004 PETITIONE^^f ^^ <AP^°^"1 ^"^ ^wy ^y' .*' ^.A^ESPONDENTS A. Kamlakant Tiwari S/o. Suryabali, Aged about 61 years, R/o. Chapdapara, Ambikapur, District Smguja (C.G.) - VERSUS 1] StateofChhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipui, (C.G.) 2] District EducaUon Offlicer, Ambikapur, DIstrictSurguja (C.G.) 3] Collector, Ambikapiu- Distt. Surguja(C.G.) 4] pistrictEducationOfficer, I KDriya, District Koriya (C.G^) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTKSLE 226G270FTHE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA \^m •HC—7! 7^ ";<1<II"1'4, ®Tllt1<IS,fsjdi<-j^< ..bf.f....l?.1.3.(^. TT?^? (' '!'!?ai^rwt;w <ftNlct<fli 'STPT^ff ^ 'fei^t Tf^FgT3 ^sjfgiian^r 01-11-2004 fhdt satuc Shri Manoj Parmajape, Slul V.V.S. Muilhy, Dy. Akhil Agrawal, Panel Lawyer for Application for ur'gent heatj Heanl. Leamed coiinsel for the Hiatter relates to U'ausfei- of subinits that ttie petitioner is rettrement He also subinits place of fh.e petitioner. He alsoj has submitted representation, uouccrucd authuiity, bul thc Hc also submits that for tfae given aa opportimily of filing before the competent authorityj sfaaU be coasidered on its own Haviug cousidered (lue witfaout expressmg aay opuuon the opmion of liiis Court, eads direction is given to the representation raising his aulhorily of thc respoudcuts alu^j aad this order, wittun 10 days, | bcing filed, tlie coanpetent Coufnsel Sor tfae petitioner, hdvouate Geueral wllli SIul tbe State. is attowed. aiifhtjrity p^escat Ipetittoner subuuts fhat the llie pctitluucr. He furtlua- ;tt onty 14 montte for liis no one has been posted in submits that fhe pctidoner Aahcxure-P/3, before the has uol bccu couaidered. tfae petitiancr may toe fhe deteiled representation of ttie rcspondeats, which in accordance with law. ittid cirt'uiusttiuces and tm fhe merits of fhe case, iu lofjustrce wffl be served if a to inake a detaifed befoise the competent wilh u copy uf tlic pctitiou |and on such reprcscntation of the respondents shaU ixilerits falcts pet(tioner gnevpnces alu^ig Xl-HC—78 an<?iq;l -CTi-ni^i QOWll '3^ '^WvT^, WrlW , |s(<'tilj1< ^...^...^^ 311^1 •<PR7(' 1- naedits decide fbe sasuue on its own a reasoned order as earfy as wceks fiwm. thc dalc of rectapl made ctear that if any gnevanc| inay avaU fhe remcdy availabte Coiuxsel for fhe petitioiie^ baa not been Telieved 30 far.| repi'eseutullou 1s dccTdcd. In VKW of the faets aad- directed lliat till the petitioiier is not reUeved, he be Wifh fhe aforeaaid dteposcd of. Conscqucnfty M.W.P.No.' also stand dteposed of. Certified copy as per rules^ in. accotdaace with Isnw by ijosaibte preferably wifhin aax of Uic repnsscutatiou. It is stiB remains, the petttioner tlnder the law. subattts that fhe petitioner He piaya for atay tiU tfae ^iiT^^ ^i^i ^ T^%1 •t.Fn'^i-1 drcumslanccs od tbfi case, it 1s is dadled, if flie 4Bowed to continue. etjyatfons, tbia petition ataada repres^ntatfon obBetlyatfons, 225/04 <SB I.A.No.7871/2004 Sd/- Fakhruddih Judge