1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. APPLICATION NO. 198 OF 2010 IN CRIM. APPEAL NO. 23 OF 2006 Dr. V.S. Chinchole ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. Mr. Tangsali i/by Mr. Sunil Kale for the Applicant Ms. S.V. Gajre, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE: MARCH 12, 2010 P.C.:- This is an application for permission to leave India. 2. The applicant has been convicted under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The applicant has sought permission, since he is going on a tour of Europe, along with his wife. 2 3. The application is opposed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor on the ground that there is an apprehension that the applicant will not come back if he leaves India. 4. It is not in dispute that the applicant has two sons, who are married and residing in India. Insofar as the apprehension of the prosecution that the applicant will not come back to India is concerned, the same can be taken care of by putting stringent condition. 5. The application is, therefore, allowed. The applicant is permitted to leave India on his furnishing cash surety in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) to the satisfaction of the Registrar, District and Sessions Court, Buldhana. The applicant, on his return, would be entitled to refund of the said amount deposited in that Court. 6. Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order. B.R. GAVAI, J.