Crl.M. No. M-35017 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-35017 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 17.2.2011 ... Daljit Singh @ Desha and another ................Petitioners vs. Veero and another .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. D.S. Pheruman, Advocate for the petitioners Sh. A.S. Rai, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. ... K.C. Puri, J. Daljit Singh @ Desha and Harsimranjit Singh @ Simranjit Singh @ Shera – petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in complaint No. 323 dated 21.7.2008, titled as Veero vs. Daljit Singh and another, under Sections 304, 342, 34 IPC pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Amritsar. FIR No. 217 dated 8.6.2007 under Sections 304, 342, 34 IPC was registered at the instance of Veero, who has stated that his son Tinku has been tied up in the house of Daljit Singh, where Daljit Singh @ Desha s/o Makhan Singh and his son Simarjit Singh were giving beatings by tying his arms with the rope and it is further Crl.M. No. M-35017 of 2010 -2- alleged that they are giving beatings with danda and fist blows. Counsel for the petitioners has relied upon the report of the DSP, in which it is mentioned that villagers have given beatings to Tinku, as he was found stealing in the house of Daljit Singh – applicant. Petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in respect of death of a person. The death has taken place in the house of the applicants. The version of the complainant from the very beginning is that Tinku deceased has been given beatings by both the petitioners after tying him. The version of the DSP cannot be given undue weightage at this stage. The crime is heinous in nature. So, no ground for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is made out. Consequently, the petition is without any merit and the same stands dismissed. ( K.C. Puri ) 17.2.2011 Judge chugh