IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No: 24891 of 2001 Between: K.Srinivas Rao, S/o. Late K.Seetharamaiah. R/o. 10-3-61/2, East Marredpally, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Govt. of A.P., Rep. Secretary. Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad-A.P. 2 The Commissioner of Land Revenue, Off: Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh. 3 The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Namaplly Station Road, Hyderabad. 4 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Secunderabad Division, Secunderabad. 5 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Marredpally Revenue Mandal, Hyderabad. 6 The Estate Officer, Secunderabad. 7 M/s. Deccan Club, Rep. Secretary. having Its Regd Office In Premises 10-3-61, Marredpally, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, order or direction more pasrticularly a writ in the Nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents 1 to 6 in not granting patta to the petitioner with respect to the Land admeasuring about 80 Sp.yards bearing premises No. 10-3-61/2 situated at East Marredpally, Secunderabad, in terms of G.O.Ms.No.972 dated 04/12/1998 as arbitrary, illegal and consequentially direct the respondents 1 to 6 grant patta to the petitioner with respect to the said land and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.NARENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: Registry has put up a note that no vakalat has been filed on behalf of the petitioner till 11.06.2009. Since neither the petitioner is present nor is he represented by counsel, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. ______________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J. 12th June 2009 CVRK