1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6149 OF 2008 Santosh Govind Jadhav and others ..Petitioners. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents. .... Mr. Anilkumar Patil for the Petitioners. Mr. R.P. Behere, Addl. G.P. for the State. ... CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.P DESHPANDE, J. 28th August, 2008. P.C. : We have heard counsel appearing for the Petitioners. The present Petition not gives proper facts and averments, but also grounds for which any appropriate directions could be issued. In the present Petition no order, direction or order of disqualification has been filed on record, the legality or validity of which is challenged. In paragraph 2 of the Writ Petition, the Petitioner has averred that election is scheduled for the post of Sarpanch but the Petitioners have not been given a copy of the 2 agenda. They are precluded from voting and contesting the election on the allegation that “they have not obtained caste validity certificate”. If that be the reason, it is not for this Court to examine this matter without any order on record. Reliefs claimed in the Petition are entirely vague and a document at Exhibit A has been filed on record which says “that the said post of Sarpanch is reserved or ladies (General)”, the translation of which is not absolutely correct. It appears that the post of Sarpanch is reserved for ladies (General). In that event Petitioner Nos. 1 to 3 will have no locus in the election to the post of Sarpanch. This Petition is thus disposed of for lack of proper particulars and facts. The Petitioners would obviously be at liberty to take such action as permissible to them in accordance with law. CHIEF JUSTICE A.P. DESHPANDE, J.