:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE SIDE SIDE SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO. 617 OF 2003 APPEAL NO. 617 OF 2003 APPEAL NO. 617 OF 2003 Mr. Raghunath Pandu Patil. ... Appellant. V/s. Mr. Anand Shreepad Gadgil. ... Respondent. .... Mr. Pradeep M. Patil for the Appellant. Ms. Gauri Godse for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD J. : DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD J. : DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD J. 05TH 05TH 05TH JULY 2007. JULY 2007. JULY 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . The Second Appeal does not raise any substantial question of law. The Additional District Judge has discussed the entire evidence carefully and cogently. The finding which has been arrived at by the Appellate Court is that the Appellant, who was the original Plaintiff had failed to establish that the bandh between Gat Nos. 174 and 175 was of his exclusive ownership. This finding of fact is entirely based on the evidence of the record. 2. There is no merit in the Second Appeal which is accordingly dismissed. -----