IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 10TH JANUARY 2011 / 20TH POUSHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 229 of 2011() --------------------------------------- CC.685/2008 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, CHAVAKKAD CRIME NO.190/2008 OF CHAVAKKAD POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DIST. .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------ SUBHASH, S/O.MOHANAN, MUTHUVEETTIL, EDAKAZHYOOR, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENT/STATE: --------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.C.S. HRITHWIK. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: The Name and rank of the petitioner in the cause title of the order dated 10/01/2011 in B.A.229/11 is corrected as ''Suresh/2nd Accused'' instead of ''Subhash/3rd Accused'' as per order dated 12/01/2011 in Crl.M.A.No.203/11 in B.A.229/11. Sd/- Assistant Registrar rs V. RAMKUMAR, J. ------------------------------- Bail Application No. 229 of 2011 ------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of January, 2011. O R D E R Petitioner who is the 3rd accused in Crime No. 190 of 2008 of Chavakkad Police Station for an offence punishable under Sec. 420 read with Sec. 34 I.P.C. seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Consequent on the non-appearance of the petitioners in C.C. No. 685 of 2008 on the file of the J.F.C.M., Chavakkad, non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate and seeks regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate and file an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same day on which Bail A.No. 229 of 2011 -:2:- it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioner and also after considering the explanation offered by the petitioner for his previous non- appearance. With the above observation this application is disposed of . Dated this the 10th day of January, 2011. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. ani/ The words “3rd accused” occurring in line 1 of the order dated `10-01-2011 in B.A. No. 229 of 2011 are corrected and substituted as “2nd accused” vide order dated 12-01-2011 in Crl.M.A. No. 203 of 2011 in B.A. 229 of 2011.