IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 9136 of 2009 Between: 1 Sripathi Kalyan S/o. Ramaswamy R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. 2 Madasi Vaikuntam S/o. Kanakaiah R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. 3 M. Santosh S/o. Pullaiah R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. 4 Patnam Devender S/o. Sammaiah R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. 5 M. Devadas S/o Uppalaiah R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. 6 Gade Vijay S/o. Yellaiah R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. 7 Gade Karunakar S/o. Anandam R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. 8 Gadipi Sagar S/o. Yellaiah R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. 9 Jakkula Raju S/o. Komaraiah R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. 10 Silveru Rajender S/o. Ilaiah R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. 11 Sathla Sammaiah S/o. Laxmaiah R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. 12 Madasi Anil S/o. Komaraiah R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. 13 Ch. Rajender S/o. Chandraiah R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. 14 Madasi Kamalakar S/o. Ilaiah R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. 15 Kandukuri Rajender S/o. Komaraiah R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. 16 Kaukuntla Santosh S/o. Ramchander R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. 17 Namindla Kishore Kumar S/o. Bikshapathi R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. 18 Jannu Raju S/o. Rajaiah R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. 19 Madasi Karunakar S/o. Shekar R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. 20 Jakkula Murali S/o. Sailu R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. 21 S. Anudeep S/o. Anandam R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Depot Manager, I.M.L. Depot, Gundlasingaram Village, Hanakonda Mandal, Warangal District. 2 The Joint Collector, Warangal District, Warangal. 3 The Managing Director, A.P. Beverages Corporation Ltd., Prohibition & Excise Complex, M.J.Road, Nampally, Hyderabad-500 001. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to direct the respondents to follow G.O.Ms.No.610, GAD (SPF.A) Dept. dt. 30.12.1985 in engaging the labour i.e., Hamalies on contract basis or on regular basis by issuing a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.RANGARAJULA RAJASEKHARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.G.MANOHAR The Court made the following : HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.9136 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioners herein, who claim to be unemployed, filed this writ petition aggrieved by the alleged inaction on the part of the respondents in implementing G.O.Ms.No.610 General Administration (SPF.A) Department dated 30.12.1985 under which all the Local Bodies, State Corporations, Government Officer and other instrumentalities of the State Government were directed to follow G.O.Ms.No.610, dated 30.12.1985 in providing employment by giving 85% of the posts to the locals. It is pleaded by the petitioners that though the first respondent has been engaging 6 to 10 hamalies per day for loading and unloading the material, they failed to follow the procedure as contemplated under G.O.Ms.No.610, dated 30.12.1985 for implementation of six point formula in Zones V to VI and the locals are completely ignored. Having regard to the nature of the allegations made by the petitioners, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition granting them liberty to make an appropriate representation before the respondents ventilating their grievances. If any such representation is made, the same shall be considered in accordance with law and appropriate orders be passed as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 10-08-2009 KLP