IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2011 / 15TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 35717 of 2010(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. MANAGER,M.A.M.U.P.SCHOOL THAVANUR (EDAPPAL SUB DISTRICT) MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 2. SHYNI M.R.LPSA, M.A.,.U.P.SCHOOL, THAVANUR (EDAPPAL SUB DISTRICT) MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 3. A.C.DEEPA, UPSA, M.A.M.U.P.SCHOOL, THAVANUR, (EDAPPAL SUB DISTRICT) MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE ASST.EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, EDAPPAL-679576 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MALAPPURAM -679505 3. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS TRIVANDRUM-695001 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.35717/2010-L ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 5th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T The main prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the third respondent to take a decision on Ext.P4, a revision petition filed under the relevant provisions of the Kerala Education Rules. The first petitioner is the Manager of an Aided Upper Primary School and the second and third petitioners are working as L.P.S.A and U.P.S.A from 24/07/2004 and 05/06/2002 respectively. The second petitioner is a T.T.C holder and the third petitioner is a B.Ed Degree holder. 2. Aggrieved by the staff fixation order Ext.P1, the first petitioner-Manager filed an appeal as per Ext.P2. The same was rejected by the second respondent as per order Ext.P3. Thereafter, Ext.P4 revision petition has been filed before the Director of Public Instructions. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. There will be a direction to the third respondent-Director of Public Instructions to take a decision on Ext.P4 revision petition within two W.P.(C). No.35717/2010 -:2:- months from the date of production of a copy of this Judgment. The petitioners will produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of the Judgment before the third respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE