THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.22722 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner submitted an application to the 1st respondent to grant permission to construct a house in her plot in Survey No.12 part of Khanamet Revenue Village. The 1st respondent accorded permission vide proceedings dated 25.08.2009. When the 2nd respondent sought to interfere with the construction, the petitioner filed O.S.No.183 of 2009 in the Court of VII Additional Senior civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar. The 2nd respondent appears to have made a representation dated 05.09.2009 to the 1st respondent bringing it to their notice the pendency of the suit. Acting on the same, the 1st respondent issued notice dated 18.09.009 keeping the permission granted to the petitioner in abeyance. The same is challenged in this writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent and the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent. On the face of it, the impugned notice is untenable in law. The 1st respondent granted permission to the petitioner on being satisfied that she has complied with all the relevant provisions of law and after collecting the stipulated fee. When she faced interference from the 2nd respondent, she as a law-abiding citizen approached the civil Court. It is rather strange and curious to note that the 1st respondent has treated the suit filed by the petitioner herself as an impediment for the permission. There cannot be any better instance of lopsided approach to the issue. It is not even alleged that the 2nd respondent has instituted any of the proceedings against the petitioner and obtained any interim orders. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is allowed and the impugned notice is set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 26.10.2009 JSU THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.22722 of 2009 Date: 26.10.2009 JSU