c£) IN THE HON'BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGrARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION IS) No.<3^ tf^/2Q11 PETITIONERS 1. Saraju Prasad Riksena S/o Shri Sundarlal Diksena, aged about 5^,. '" Years, occupation Lecturer, at Govt. Higher Secondary School Katghora Block Katghora, Distt. Korba (C.G.) 2. Harnarayan Pathak S/o Shri Chandrabhushan Pathak, aged about 55 Years, occupation Head Master, at Govt. Middle School Chhirra Block Katghora, Distt. Korba (C.G.) 3. Ramshankar Shukla S/o .Shri Siyaram Shukla, aged about 53 Years, occupation Lecturer, at Govt. Higher Secondary School Katghora Block Katghora, Distt. Korba (C.G.) 4. Rajendra Kumar Mishra S/o Shri Malik Ram Mishra, aged about 55 Years, occupation Head Master, at Govt. Middle School Vijaypur Block RESPONDBNTS: Katghora, Distt. Korba (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Deportment D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. Commissioner, Tribal — Welfare Deportment, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deportment, Korba District Korba (C.G.) 4. Joint Director, ,Treasury,accounts, pension, Bilaspur District-Bilaspur WRIT UNDER ARTICLB 226^)FLTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA •-/ ,^:'- .^ ./' .' x^ "^^s MtGHCOURrC^jCMMATrtSGARH: BtLASPUR WBrT PETmON (S) N0. 3443 QF 2©11 PETIXIONERS RESPONDENTS Saraju Prasad Diteena & Olhera^ Vereus , ^ State ofChhatBsgarh & Othei^ 4WritP9titionunderArticte226ofth®Consti^^ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Sati^i K. Ayiihotrl, J. Pre&erCI- S^^^ ^.••-^^..,. ... •;;;...,^ 3 ShriSushilDubey.Govt.Ach/ocatelortheState. ~, ORDER^RAU :': . .:.::.:lll::,.''-.:'./:T:,! (Passed on this 01<t da^ of Jufy. 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for th®parttw. - •^^ . ::.': ••••••• 2.^^^^ ^ initially appolnted on tfi®post ef Assistant Teacher on a fixed |>ay o^ Rs.lOOA- in ttie year 1977-78. ^terGompletJon <rf flie prpbatjon perioct,the petitionerwas grantedregular payscate Rs.169-300. 3. Learned cbunsel appearlng for jthe petftioners submits that ttie issue involved in the case is asto whettier, the petitipners are •ntitted to regular pay sciale w.ej. ther da^s of inftial aRpointment or after comptetion of l'prc^ation,period. •;1,;: ^ 1" /: • '-•1 11-!- 1 - -1 * 4. The issue involved, hei^n was (^side^ by tiw R^^^^^^^ Administrativ®Tribunal, ^faeilpur jrv OA No. 2T45^ ^aclhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & otheFs), wherein it was held (hat e ^imilarly situated teachere ware enttBed to regutar pay scate wAf. ttie date of initial appojntment. The matter was taken vp to Court inSpeciarLeaye Petitton<OMO N©.^92/93.T^^ dismissed by tl]e Suprem®CourtjB^hokltna the decision of the TNbunal te th®effectthatthe Teachers/Ass.lstantT^ichere are entltled to reguterpay seate from date of inltial aiaipoinlinent. 5. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioners also sutanitsthat this Court, whlle considenng the jame issue ^ AmarSai f?iam & i^ers v. Stete of Chhatti^arh & ^hers JW.P. (S) No.4725/200^ by wder dated 01.09.2CX36, alltwal the petitioner to make a Fepre®entationwWiin a period of ten days, rajsing all their grievances. AGCordingly, the petitioners are granted tiberty to make a representeition raising all the grievances in light of the aforestatect judynefit and tt» circular dated 05.01.2011 (Annexure P-2), and in turn, tlie eoncerned respondent is directed to decide the representatton, if any, in accordanc» w'rth law and the aforestated decisions, on $ts own mertts, with&n a periocl? -4 of 8 weeks from the date of jeceipt of the representation, subject to verification ofthefacts. . lnviewofttieforegoing,thispetitionis disposed of. NoorderaBtocosts.* Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok k-