IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 5569 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.09.2010 Surinder Singh .... Petitioner Versus Bachittar Singh and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. C.M. Munjal, Advocate for the petitioner ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) C.M. No. RA-CR-158-CII of 2010 For the reasons mentioned in the application, C.M. is allowed. Order dated 1.9.2010 is recalled. C.R. No. 5569 of 2010 Arguments heard. Present petition is filed challenging order dated 25.5.2010 passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) thereby declining the prayer of the plaintiff-petitioner to produce additional evidence. Undisputedly suit is pending before the trial Court right from year 1993 and plaintiff evidence was closed after giving full opportunities to the plaintiff. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not able to point out as to why despite of due diligence additional evidence sought to be placed on record could not be placed at the time when plaintiff was leading evidence. I find no illegality in the impugned order. Dismissed. (ALOK SINGH) 23.09.2010 JUDGE reena