THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.4999 OF 2006 ORDER: The petitioner-tenant filed this revision under Section 22 of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 {“the Act” for brevity}, inter alia, seeking to assail the common order dated 18.08.2006 in R.A.No.40 of 2004 and Cross Objections RASR.No.2310 of 2004 on the file of the Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, in allowing the eviction petition filed under Sections 10 (2) (i), 10 (2) (iv) and 10 (2) (iii) of the Act seeking eviction of tenant and dismissing the Cross Objections filed challenging the quantum of rent. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the respondent- landlady filed eviction petition mainly on the grounds of wilful default and causing damage to the property. As to the first ground, the Court below has not accepted and rejected the same. As regards the damage is concerned, however, it has to be seen that the said ground squarely falls within the mischief of causing damage as contemplated under the Act. Therefore, it cannot be said that there is no such ground available. Admittedly, the walls have been removed and the petitioner has hopelessly failed to establish any consent of the respondent. Having regard to the concurrent findings already given, I do not find any warrant to interfere with the order of the Court below. Hence, there are no merits in the revision. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. However, the time for eviction is granted for a period of three {3} months from today. ____________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, HACJ) 18th November 2010 RRB