IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37420 of 2009 ANAND KUMAR @ ANAND KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 23.11.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Sections 408, 467 and 468 of the Penal Code. Allegation is that petitioner and the principal in- charge of P.R. college, Sonepur withdrew huge amount meant for the students of the B.C.A course forging the signature of the informant who is Director of the B.C.A. course of the said college without any knowledge. It is admitted position that the amount was withdrawn by a cheque signed by two signatories including the in-charge principal. The amount involved is Rs. 7500/- (Seven thousand and Five hundred only). Learned counsel for the petitioner, referring to the agreement entered into by and between the petitioner and the informant, submits that the informant did accept the receipt of certain amount from the petitioner in connection with management of the institute. When the amount was not paid to him the complaint was duly filed on 03.07.2009, Annexure-5 to the bail application. Only thereafter the present F.I.R. was lodged on 04.07.2009. Be that as it may, having regard to the submissions and the materials available on record, this Court is persuaded to 2 extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail. In the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM Saran at Chhapra in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case no. 160 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. It is made clear that one of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioner. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)