-:1:- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 309 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 309 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 309 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 263 OF 2008 APPEAL NO. 263 OF 2008 APPEAL NO. 263 OF 2008 Sahebrao Lakdu Jadhav. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Mr. N.R. Bubna for Applicant. Mr. P.S. Hingorani, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & K.U. K.U. K.U. CHANDIWAL,JJ. CHANDIWAL,JJ. CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 28TH APRIL, 2008. : 28TH APRIL, 2008. : 28TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . The Appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code. 2. The learned Judge has accepted the evidence of the eye witnesses. The defence of the Appellant was that he was not present at the place of incidence. The learned Judge has considered that aspect in paragraphs 73 and 74 and did not accept the said evidence. 3. In our opinion, considering the evidence on record, this would not be a fit case for granting bail considering that there is a conviction based on evidence of eye witnesses. The Appellant was not on bail during trial. The Application for bail is rejected. (K.U. (K.U. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) CHANDIWAL,J.) CHANDIWAL,J.) (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.)