IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33489 of 2008 BINOD SINGH, Son of Bhuneshwar Singh, Resident of Village Neknam Tola, P.S. Barahara, District Bhojpur -------------Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR -------------Opp. Party ----------- 2. 21.10.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barhara P.S. Case No.137/08 for the alleged offences registered under sections 406, 409 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the allegation of demand for payment of governmental aid under Indira Awas Yojna is against the co-accused, who is the Mukhiya of the Gram Panchayat in question. As a matter of fact, payments were made to the persons. So far the allegation against the petitioner is concerned, he is alleged to have gone to the informant and demanded Rs.5,000/-. The said allegation in so far as this petitioner is concerned is vague as there is no allegation that the petitioner demanded the money for or in connection with the disbursement of the money under the Indira Awas Yojana. Besides the above, it is submitted that the other co-accused, namely, Sushil Singh, who is the son of the Mukhiya and is also alleged to have demanded the money, has been allowed bail as stated in the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender 2 in connection with Barahara P.S. Case No.137/08 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)