IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY WRIT PETITION Nos. 24622 & 20582 of 2002, 4984 & 9426 of 2005, 15804 & 17358 of 2006 WRIT PETITION Nos.24622 OF 2002: Between: K.Satyanarayana and four others. … Petitioners And The Government of A.P., reptd., by its Prl. Secretary, Housing Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri J.Ramachandra Rao. Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Municipal Administration for R.1 & R.4. Sri C.V.Rajeeva Reddy for R.2. Sri M.Dhananjaya Reddy for R.3. None for R.5. WRIT PETITION Nos.20582 OF 2002: Between: Kukatapally Housing Board, V Phase, HIG Residents Welfare Association, reptd., by Sri Narasimha Raju, General Secretary, HIG 57 KPHB Colony, V Phase, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District. … Petitioner And The State of A.P., reptd., by its Prl. Secretary to Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad and eight others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri B.Sudhakar Reddy. Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Municipal Administration for R.1 & R.4. Sri C.V.Rajeeva Reddy for R.2. Sri M.Dhananjaya Reddy for R.3. None for R.5 to R.9. WRIT PETITION Nos.4984 OF 2005: Between: Kukatapally Housing Board, V Phase, HIG Residents Welfare Society, reptd., by Its President-G.V.Subramanyam, HIGH-128, Phase-V,KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District. … Petitioner And A.P. Housing Board, Gruhakalpa, Nampally, Hyderabad, reptd., by its Vice-Chairman & Managing Director and another. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri P. Keshava Rao. Counsel for the respondents: Sri C.V.Rajeeva Reddy WRIT PETITION Nos.9426 OF 2005: Between: Kukatapally Housing Board, V Phase, HIG Residents Welfare Society, reptd., by its President-G.V.Subramanyam, HIGH-128, Phase-V,KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District. … Petitioner And A.P. Housing Board, Gruhakalpa, Nampally, Hyderabad, reptd., by its Vice-Chairman & Managing Director and another. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri P. Keshava Rao. Counsel for the respondents: Sri C.V.Rajeeva Reddy WRIT PETITION Nos.15804 OF 2006: Between: Kukatapally Housing Board, V Phase, HIG Residents Welfare Society, reptd., by Its President-G.V.Subramanyam, HIGH-128, Phase-V,KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District. … Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Housing Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Reptd., by its Chief Secretary and four others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Smt.P. Radhika. Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Municipal Administration for R.1 & R.3. Sri C.V.Rajeeva Reddy for R.2. Sri M.Dhananjaya Reddy for R.4. None for R.5. WRIT PETITION Nos.17358 OF 2006: Between: Kukatapally Housing Board, V Phase, HIG Residents Welfare Society, reptd., by Its President-G.V.Subramanyam, HIGH-128, Phase-V,KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District. … Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Housing Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Reptd., by its Chief Secretary and four others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Smt.P. Radhika. Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Municipal Administration for R.1. Sri C.V.Rajeeva Reddy for R.2 & R.3. This Court made the following: COMMON ORDER:- This batch of Writ Petitions is ﬁled questioning the action of respondent No.2 in seeking to utilize the land, which was reserved for community purposes, for commercial purposes. In the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.2 it is averred that during the pendency of the Writ Petitions, respondent No.3 (HUDA) has issued a revised layout plan authorizing respondent No.2 to undertake commercial activities. Admittedly, the petitioners have not questioned the proceedings of respondent No.3, by which the layout was revised. Unless the petitioners successfully challenge the said proceedings, no relief can be granted to them. In this view of the matter, all these Writ Petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to question the revised lay out in respect of Phase-V of K.P.H.B. Colony, Hyderabad. To facilitate the petitioners to avail fresh remedy, respondent No.3 is directed to supply the petitioners the authenticated copies of the revised layouts within a period of one week from the date of the petitioners applying for the same. For a period of six weeks, status quo obtaining as on today shall be maintained with regard to the land in dispute. --------------------------- --------- C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date: 20-10-2008 Note: Issue CC in one week (BO) MNR