1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 9477 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 9477 OF 2010 Jagannath S/o Govinda Mahale and another Versus Chopda Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd. and ors. *** 1. Contentions, Assistant Registrar did not verify service of notice upon petitioner before proceeding further, did not grant sufficient opportunity to petitioners to defend themselves, and the petitioners never applied for loan of such huge amount. It is urged that petitioner is working as conductor and it is beyond apprehension that he would apply for such huge amount. 2. Learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.1 bank and learned A.G.P. appearing for Respondent No.2 stated that remedy of filing appeal is available to the petitioner. 3. According to learned counsel for the petitioner the issue is squarely covered by various judgments of this Court. 4. I find that those judgments are binding 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 9477 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. even on authority before which appeal is required to be filed. As the petitioner has got alternate remedy of appeal and due to some disputed question of fact, I find it proper not to interfere in writ jurisdiction. With liberty to petitioner to take recourse to said remedy writ petition stands disposed of. At this stage, learned counsel states that interim orders operating, be continued for a period of two weeks. Counsel for respondent is opposing the request. In the interest of justice, those orders are continued for two weeks and shall cease to operate automatically thereafter. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:12/01/2011. ans/9477