IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 884 of 2005 Between: 1 Priya Fisheries Pvt. Ltd, rep. by its Managing Director, D.No. 6-15-44/1, East Point Colony, Visakhapatnam - 17. 2 K.G.R. Exports Ltd, rep. by its Authorised Signatory, Plot No. 23, VBC Complex, Fishing Harbour, Visakhapatnam - ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Union of India, rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi. 2 Union of India, rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Surface Transport, New Delhi. 3 Tariff Authority for Major Port Trust, Rep. by its Director, 2nd Floor, Gate No. 30, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, New Delhi - 110 003. 4 Visakhapatnam Port Trust, rep. by its Chairman, Visakhapatnam. 5 M/s M.S.T.C. Limited (A Govt. of India Enterprises), Rep. by its Manager, having its Office at 3rd Floor, 30-15-786, Subbaramareddy Complex, Daba Gardens, Visakhapatnam - 530 020. 6 The Traffic Manager, Visakhapatnam Port Trust, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in enhancing the Vessel related charges for fishing vessels as shown in the Appendix filed along with the Writ Petition, as illegal and ultravires to the provisions of Articles 14 and 19(1) (g) of the constitution of India and also the provisions of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 consequently directing the respondents to collect the old rates and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.S.R.ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.884 of 2005 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter dated 16.06.2009 before the Registry seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition. In view of the said letter dated 16.06.2009, the counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. . Interim stay granted on 28.01.2005 shall stand vacated. R.SUBHASH REDDY,J Date:17.06.2009 usd