S.B.CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.41/2007 Piyush Gadia VS. Malvika Panwar & Ors. Date of Order :: 3.9.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. H.S. Shekhawat, for the petitioner. Mr. B.L. Bhati, for the respondents. ... Counsel for the respondents states that in pursuant to the directions given by this Court appointments have already been given to the petitioners. The fact regarding the grant of appointment is not denied by the petitioners. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not consider it appropriate to proceed against the respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Accordingly, this contempt petition is dismissed. The rule issued is discharged. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal '