RESBI'sr ^pt \\}°'t'v _ @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGAfW AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV QUPTA, CJ & HON'BLE SHRSSUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. WntABpeal No. 189 of2n07 ADpellant Petitioner Respondents J Pritpat Stngh Bhatia S/o Shri H.S. Bhatia, agedabout 47 years, R/o Near Bus stand Paahalgaon Distt -Jashpur Chhattisgarh. VERSUS State Transport Appellate Tribunai, Raipur Chhatti^arh R.T.A. Chhattisgarh, Raipur Secretary, RTA Bilaspur (C.G.) Ghanshyam Singh, Kabtr ChtWk, Jute MIII, Road, Raigarh Chhattisgarh. Nand Kishore Gupta, through Jagdish Gupte, Holder of General Power of Attomey, Rajendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Writ Appeal under Section 2H) of the Chhattisaarh Hlah Court (Appea! to Diviston Bench^ Act 2006 read with Ruls 10 of l-ligh Court Chhattisaarh Rules 2005. Present: Appettant's rounsel ateent. Shri VinayHarit, DeputyAdvocate General forthe State / respondents No. 1 to 3. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. JUDGMENT (08th February, 2008) The following judgment of the Court was dellvered by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. " i:«ga w^^s^ ii'i !';i ^••- w'1. \.'.^-.^.... Subbu On 06-11-2007, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. (2) In this vlew of the matter, we are left with no other option but to yismiss the writ appeal for want of prosecution. (3) The writ appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Sunii Kumar Sinha Judse j&' v '!^3sSSS^1 g^a^;!'^