IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2123 of 2008 SHYAMAL KUMAR JHA Versus PUNYANAND JHA & ORS ----------- 2. 19.12.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner referring to the order of the lower appellate court reversing the order of injunction granted by the trial court has pointed out an apparent error on the face of record, inasmuch as in paragraph 9 of the judgment of the lower appellate court it has been recorded that the trial court had granted injunction in respect of the entire plot of 1 katha and 12 dhurs whereas the fact remains that from the reading of the plaint it would be clear that Schedule I, Schedule II and Schedule III thereof taken together on which the trial court had granted injunction was limited only to 4 dhurs of land. Counsel for the petitioner, therefore, seems to be correct that part of the reasoning given in the impugned order is based on error of record. This Court, therefore, would set aside the impugned order passed by the lower 2 appellate court and direct the lower appellate court to reconsider the whole matter afresh in accordance with law. This application is, accordingly, allowed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/