HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5410 OF 2010 Date:12-12-2011 Between: Andhavarapu Govinda Rao. - - - Petitioner/Defendant. And Baratam Sandhya Rani. - - - Respondent/Plaintiff. This Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5410 of 2010 ORDER: Being aggrieved by the order dated 28-11-2011, passed in unnumbered I.A. of 2011 in O.S. No.140 of 2010 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Srikakulam, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. 2. The Petitioner herein is the Defendant and Respondent herein is the Plaintiff in O.S. No.140 of 2010. 3. The brief facts of the case are as follows : The Respondent filed a suit for recovery of money. The evidence on behalf of the Respondent-Plaintiff was over and subsequently the Petitioner has also let in evidence. After the evidence was closed, the Respondent- Plaintiff filed two applications in I.A. No.911 of 2011 and 912 of 2011 in O.S. No.140 of 2010 seeking to reopen the case and issue summons to the proposed witnesses to examine on his behalf. The said two applications were allowed on 15-11-2011. Now the Petitioner’s case is that he has filed an unnumbered I.A. before the lower court seeking a direction to stay the operation of the said impugned orders passed on 15-11-2011. On the same day, the application was returned with an objection ‘How the petition is maintainable under Section 151 C.P.C.’ Challenging the said endorsement, this Civil Revision Petition has been filed. 4. Sri T. Raja Sekhar Rao, the learned counsel for the Petitioner contends that the Petitioner has categorically informed the lower Court that he was intending to file a Revision challenging the orders dated 15-11-2011 and as such his counsel had applied for certified copies of the said orders to enable him to file the Revision. Except the words saying that his counsel had applied for certified copies of the orders dated 15-11-2011 to enable the Petitioner herein to file a Revision, he has not given neither the date of the application filed seeking for the certified copies nor the C.A. number in his affidavit filed before the lower Court or in the Revision filed before this Court. Thus, it is not clear when the Petitioner had applied for the certified copies of the orders dated 15-11-2011 and what happened to that application. 5. In the above circumstances, suffice to say that if at all the Petitioner had filed any application for certified copies of those orders dated 15-11-2011 and filed the required stamps for the certified copies, the same may be issued within three days from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. Even otherwise, the Petitioner may file a fresh application for the certified copies of those orders dated 15-11- 2011 and the required stamps immediately after the stamps are called for and then the lower Court may issue certified copies of those orders within three days from the date of deposit of the stamps. Subject to the observations made above, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed at the stage of admission itself. No order as to costs. _____________________ B. CHANDRA KUMAR, J Date:12-12-2011. Note: Issue C.C. by 13-12-2011. B/o.Dsh. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR 217 CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5410 OF 2010 December, 12, 2011 DSH.