IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2939 of 2010 1. ASHOK BHAGAT, SON OF BRAHMDEO BHAGAT 2. MAHANGU BHAGAT, SON OF GULAM BHAGAT BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHAWARUA, P.S. MADHUBAN, DISTRICT-EAST CHAMPARAN. 3. MAHADEO BHAGAT, SON OF LATE RAM SURAT BHAGAT 4. BIRENDRA MANJHI, SON OF GIRDHARI MANJHI BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE LOHARGAWA, P.S. MADHUBAN, DISTRICT-EAST CHAMPARAN. …..Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. D. K. Tandon (Adv.) For the State : APP. ----------- 05/ 07.07.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Counsel for the State. On 16.02.2010, it was submitted by the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the seized articles were not put on Test Identification Parade. To ascertain this carbon/photo copy of the case diary was called for which has been received. From the case diary it appears that the seized articles were duly identified. Considering this, I am not inclined to grant bail to the above named petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)