1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7575 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Mr.P.P.Killedar for the petitioner. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 4th February 2010. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The petitioner is the original plaintiff. By the impugned order, application made by the petitioner for issuing witness summons to a Co-operative Sugar Factory has been rejected by the trial Court. This application was made by the petitioner at a stage when the suit was fixed for arguments. 2. Considering the fact that the order is interlocutory and the same has been passed at a stage when the suit was fixed for arguments, no interference at this stage is called for. If the decree which may be passed in the suit be adverse to the petitioner, the impugned order can be always challenged in the appeal which may be preferred by the petitioner. Subject to what is observed above, the petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA,J)