:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.908 OF 2008 TAX APPEAL NO.908 OF 2008 TAX APPEAL NO.908 OF 2008 WITH WITH WITH INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.909 OF 2008 TAX APPEAL NO.909 OF 2008 TAX APPEAL NO.909 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax, ..Appellant Vs. Bajaj Hindustan Ltd. ..Respondent Mrs.Devki Iyer for the Appellant. Ms.V.B.Patel for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, S.J.KATHAWALLA, S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2008 : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2008 : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Mrs.Iyer, the learned Counsel for the Appellant had appeared on 26th August,2008 and took time to serve the Respondent and accordingly, the matter was adjourned to 16th September,2008. Ms.Patel had appeared on that day and stated that the Respondent has not been served. Again on 16th September,2008, as a last chance, the matter was adjourned for today i.e. 23rd September,2008. Today, Mrs.Iyer states that the Appellant has not served the Respondent till today. Mrs.Iyer is unable to state as to what steps have been taken by the Appellant to serve the Respondents. Hence, in view of the callous attitude of the Appellant, we are inclined to dismiss both the above Appeals for want of service. (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) :2: