HIGH COURr OF CHHAmS®ARH:BILASBUR Writ PBtttlonte)No.33S7ol' 2007 PeUUoner Mumar Reghatate S/o. Gutab Rao Raghatate AgeEl aboirt - % yeare, R/o.-l-1irapur Colony, Raipur, Distt.-Raipur(C.G.) Vwsus Respondents 1. Smt. SmKa Raghatate W/a Yogesh Kumar Raghatate, Egsl atMul - 26 . years, D/&.-ShriSh^imrao Rokde . 2. Ku. Yashika D/o Yc^sh KarrMr Raghatate, aged about-1& halfyears, Minor Guardianthrou^i:- motherSmt. Smfta Raghatate, Both R/o Indir Magar, Charoda, P.S.- Bhilai-3, Distfc-Ouig (C.G.) (Writ Petition under Article 226C27 ofthe Constitutionof tndia) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Juatlca Safeh K. ^nUiotit Presenfc Shri Dheerendra Pandey, counsel forlhe petlttomsr. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 19* .lune, Wff^ By this peUUon the peittfoner impugns fce intorim oider dated 20.12.2006 passed by the Princi|Kil Judge, Famfly Gourt, Ding in an applicatton filed under Sectton 125 ofthe Criminat Ppecedw Code in M.J.G. No. 85 of 2007. The main ground teken by ttie petitioner is thatthepeUUoner has otherliabitities i.e. looking afterantfmaintaWng his parents and the amount awarded is excreshre. (2) Leamed counsel appearing for the f^itoner si.femitsAat the monthly income of the petitioner is Rs.3SOW- eut oflhafrRs.lOOCy- has been granted to the respondent No.l-wifo and RsSOOt- ts the respondent No.2 minor daughteroTthe peBtionerand re^>ondentNo.t. -2- ^) Kamna P) In the o|rinion of ttife Oourt, gRMifiBg Rs.lSOCy- in trtri, s® intBrim maintBnance, is just and properas adntittedly flie toeome efthe petitioner is Rs.3500/- per month, (4) In viaw of the feregoing, thera is no merit in thts sase. The peUtton is accordlngfy dlsmissed.summanty. Sd/- Satish K. Agnifaotri Judge