IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4745 of 2010 ====================================================== Binay Kumar Tiwary, S/o Sri Ramakant Tiwary, R/o village – Barka Diya, P.S. Krishna Bramh, District – Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Anup Mukharjee S/o not known to the petitioner, presently posted as Chief Secretary Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 3. Neel Mani S/o not known to the petitioner, presently posted as Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariate, Patna. 4. Vineet Vinayak, S/o not known to the petitioner, present posted as Deputy Inspector General of Police, Central Range, Patna. 5. Mr. Naiyar Hussain Khan S/o not known to the petitioner, then S.S.P. Patna, presently posted as S.P. Purnea. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Narendra Kr. Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp8) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. MRIDULA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. MRIDULA MISHRA) 02/ 17-10-2011 This application has been filed by the petitioner for initiating a proceeding of contempt due to non-compliance of order dated 21.07.2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 1146 of 2010. The writ application had been disposed of, directing the petitioner to file his representation before the respondent-authority and the respondent-authority was directed to consider such representation and dispose it of. In case any vacancy is there, posts advertised through Advertisement No. 01/2004 in unreserved category, petitioner’s case be considered, for appointment, as per his position in the panel of selected candidates. In case he is entitled Patna High Court MJC No.4745 of 2010 (2) dt.17-10-2011 2 / 2 2 for being appointed, appointment letter be issued in favour of the petitioner. Show cause has been filed on behalf of Superintendent of Police, Purnea as well as Deputy Inspector General of Police, Central Range, Patna. Statement made in both the show cause makes it clear that petitioner’s representation has been considered and disposed off. No one having lesser marks than the petitioner has been appointed. The last person appointed had 15 marks and the petitioner has got only 12 marks. Considering the show cause, it shows compliance of the direction of this Court, this application is dismissed. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J)