IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31572 of 2008 PARSURAM GUPTA & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.08.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the state. Petitioner No. 1 is the Block Pramukh of Sheo Sagar and petitioner No. 2 is the co-villager who made complaint against one, Rupmina Devi who is an Anganwadi Sevika. She was appointed executer of a scheme relating to construction of office of Anganwadi Sevika. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the complainant Rupmeena Devi being Anganwadi Sevika was appointed executer for construction of Anganwadi centre building. She did not complete the work though money was advanced to her. The complaint was made by petitioner No. 2 and petitioner No. 1 recommended to the Block Development Officer for directing the complainant to refund the amount. Considering the fact that though the complaint was made but subsequently, she herself deposited the amount and so far the offence u/S 3(x) of S.C. & S.T. Act does not make out, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners, namely, Parsuram Gupta and Nand Lal Dubey is allowed. In the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in the court below, they will be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sheo Sagar P.S. Case No. 61/08 to the satisfaction of - 2 - CJM, Rohtas at Sasaram subject to the conditions as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. The order be faxed to the concerned court only today at the cost of the petitioners. AKV/ (Mridula Mishra,J.)