THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No. 13821 of 2006 Date: 21-07-2006. Between : Sukka Sawaramma …..Petitioner And The Land Acquisition Officer/Special Deputy Collector, L.A.Unit, Jawahar Lift Irrigation Project, Gadwal & others. …..Respondents. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No. 13821 of 2006 ORDER : Heard learned counsel for petitioner Sri A.Sudershan Reddy and the learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition and at request, the writ petition itself is taken up and disposed of at the stage of admission. Learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition has obtained instructions in response of the averments in the writ petition. Petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of the 1st respondent in referring a dispute as to the ownership and therefore the entitlement to compensation for land acquired, to the Civil Court under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). The petitioner states that she along with respondent Nos.2 to 7 own and are in possession of several extents of land in several specified survey numbers of Naardoddi v illa g e , Maldakal Mandal, Mahabubnagar District (specified in para 3 of the writ petition). The property was purchased by the father of the petitioner and of respondent Nos.2 and 3. Respondent Nos.4 to 6 are stated to be the heirs of late M. Kantaiah, another brother of the petitioner and of respondent Nos.2 and 3. The 7th respondent is stated to be the daughter of late Thimmappa, another brother. Petitioner claims entitlement to 1/5th share in the land. Petitioner asserts that the 1st respondent acquired the specified extents of land for formation of Nagardoddi Balancing Reservoir and that it was agreed between the heirs of Late Talari Chinna Sawari that the compensation amount ought to be divided at 1/5th each to the petitioner and respondent Nos.2 to 7 as per the family arrangement, but the respondent Nos.2 to 7 are refusing to give any share to the petitioner in the compensation amount and are openly claiming that the petitioner is not so entitled. Apprehending deprivation of her legitimate share in the property and in the compensation thereto, the petitioner claims to have filed O.S.No. 138 of 2006 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Gadwal for partition and separate possession. The suit is stated to be pending. The party-respondents herein are stated to have been impleaded as defendants in the suit. The petitioner states to have made a detailed representation to the 1st respondent setting up her right to the land and therefore to compensation for its acquisition. Apprehending that the respondents may pass an award and disburse compensation to respondent Nos.2 to 7 leaving her high and dry, the writ petition is filed. Learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition, on instructions, states that no award has yet been passed relating to the acquisition of the land claimed by the petitioner and of the respondent Nos.2 to 7 and that the petitioner’s representation will receive due consideration by the 1st respondent and will be dealt with in the award to be passed. In view of this submission made on behalf of the 1st respondent by the learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition, the current grievance of the petitioner does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission above, that the 1st respondent would consider the petitioner’s representation dated 03.06.2006 while passing the award, the writ petition is disposed of. _____________________ (GODA RAGHURAM, J) 21st July 2006 ajr