IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.19892 of 2010 DEEAPK KUMAR @ ARVIND KUMAR PANDIT son of Ravindra Pandit Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 14.06.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in para 11 of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 406, 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission is that initially after investigation final report was submitted in the matter but cognizance has been taken on protest petition treating the same as a complaint. Considering the same and also that others have been granted anticipatory bail, it is ordered that in the event of surrender of the petitioner, named above, within four weeks from today in connection with Comp. Case No.3425 of 2004, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C., and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)