-f^ .€. t~tr^r^'"" '-.'"'' f£ \f^,/\^' „.. 1 r?CS' ?\!3. '- ,•^'^fs-i^. "^:.^^-*- ;-.&u.^FSSi»^aS^.i (^' PETITXONER BEFORE THB HON'BLE HIGH GOURT OF CHHATTISGARH; BILASPUR wi.pi-s^-L'2'.3-.^220.ii. ! Bhuvanlal Shrivas son of Oangaram Shrivas. aged absut 35 years, R/o village Jarve vla Baradwar, Tahsil Sakti, Distt. Janjg-tr - caiampa (CG). V E RSU S ;- 1) Superlntendant of Post office, .-^ '^dt^'1 Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) ^.••'^'.t\ii-r'^ .,..••. 2) Post Master, Post Office, ^'^.^0^.^ Jarve (Baradwar), RESPONDENTS v^^^ ?<";a^--"" ^^ &&' Distt. Jan^gir - Champa (C.G.). PETITIGN_UNDES ARTICLE 226/227 OP THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF INDIA s Xi-HC-22 ^^ •^l'i|l''lt4, ^Tll^lto, isicii^y W.P.No.1734/2001 ^FrfcT^ ^R^ff ^ f^st ii'3iNlT 3T!^( Punja^i Adnlbis^faSlve Chbattisglarb Heard Shr i Vipin petitioner and Stari &.S. Gah^rwar Standing counsel for respond^nt, shri Gaharwar submits examined by the Central functioning at tbe moment at| Madbya Pradesh and mitted by Shri A.S. Gabarwar| ougbt to have filed tbe appejal but tbe same bas not been do!ne Be that as it may. it approacb tbe appropriate for|tua Tribunal for redressal of bljs In view of the reason^ to accept this petition and , learned counsel for the ,Sr. Sentral Goverraent fchat this matter should be Tribunal which is Jabalpur for ttie States of It 1s also further sub- that in fact the petitioner beface the Competent AuthoEily, |seems tbat the petitioner stiauld namely Central Actainistrative |s grievance. stated above, I am not inclined jthe same is rejected. rsnd* Sd/- Chief Justice [ift^'?Rgq -—L