S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR LCHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) No55£3720U, PETITIONER: / Shyamlal Sahu, son of Nathuram Sahu, aged about 58 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, residence of Barpali Road, Post Tundra, Tahsil Kasdole, District Raipur, Chhatdsgarh. versus Respondents .^^ %%y ^^ -/^w 0^"y /^/ -••"'•t<^' •• ^yy <^/ »y / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Education Departinent, D.K-S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ^2. District Educadon Of&cer, District Baloda Bazar, Chhattisgarh. /3. Block Education Officer, Kasdole, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ^4. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur, District Raipur, C.G WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETmQNE& HIGH COURT OF CHHATNSQARH AT BILASPinR SB : HON'BLB MR. JUSTIC®PmTIKKERDIWAKER. PBTITIONBR RBSPOKDBNTS W.P.ISI.BO. 5553/2011 Sbyamlal Satiu veraus State ofC.G. & Others ^ Shri K.P.Sahu, counsel for fhe petitiaaer. ShriA.V.Shridhar, P.L. for fhe State. WRIT^ETITION UNDBR ARTICLB 226 OF THB COKSTITUTIOK OP INDIA ORDBR (19.09.2011) Counsel for fhe petitioner submits that the petltioner is eatitled to benefit of two advance iacrenients on accoiint af he having passed B.T.I. examiDation in fhe year 1973 before his appomitmeat at tus own cost. It is subinitted that fhe issue involved In fhe present petition is no longer res integra and fhe same has been finatty decided by fhe Hon'ble Supreine Court iu the case of Ariha Saxeaa Vs. StateofM.P. fe Ors. 2009 pntMPJR (SC)S9. It is ftufher submitted that this Gourt tiaa also taken a similar view in its order dated 6.2.2009 passed in W.P.P) No. 6257/2008. Counsel for the petitioners further submits that the order dated 29.4.2010 passed in Writ Appeal N0. 124/2009, wherein retyiag upon the judgment offhe Supreaie Court in the case ofAsha Saxena (supra) aad the order passed by this Court ia aaottier Writ Appeal No. 87/2009, directions have becn issued for eonsMeratmn of the 'case for graat of two advaace increiuents as per circular dated 2l.9.1974issuedbythc State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of the facts pleaded in ftie petition. Counsel for the State submlts that case of fhe petitioner would also be considered on fhc saiuc lin.es. E-^ In view of above, the petitfon is disposed ofwith a directicai to the respondent authorities to decide the claim of fhe petitioner for grant of two advaace iacrements as per circular dated 21.9,1974 issued by fhe State of Madhya Pradesh after verificataon of fhe fects pleaded ia the petitfon wifhia a period offour taonths finin today. It is made ctear that this Court has not expresaed aay opiafon on laerits offhe case aad tbe auttiority concemed wouM be at liberty to decide the same stricfty ia accordance wifh law. Pritiiiker Diwaker ^ ;e >' 1