IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 11557 of 2008 Between: Poosa Jai Hind Rao S/o. Late P. Bhoomaiah R/o. H.No. 18-8-651, Kumarwadi, Hyderabad-23 ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 2 The Tahsildar, Saroornagar Mandal of Ranga Reddy District. ..RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in orally preventing the modification of H.No.. 11-98/R Meerpet Village, of Saroornagar Mandal in Ranga Reddy District without any written notice and in spite of pending regularization proceedings as illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to the principles of natural justice and direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the said house without recourse to law and to pass such other order/s Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.VENUGOPALA RAO PASNOORU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court at the stage of admission made the following : ORDER: Petitioner claims to be the owner and possessor of H.No.11-98/R of Meerpet Village of Saroornagar Mandal in Ranga Reddy District. It is his case that when he is trying to make certain modifications to the house, the respondents are interfering with his possession of the property. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue and at their request, the writ petition is taken up for hearing at the admission stage itself. On instructions, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that no house is there on the land in question and that the same is a government land. Even according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has made an application for regularization and the same is still pending. The said fact is also denied by the learned Government Pleader. At any rate, the issue whether the petitioner has raised any structures on the land in question before the date of filing the application for regularization or not is a disputed question of fact, which cannot be gone into by this Court in this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, no relief can be granted to the petitioner in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedies available to him under law. N.V.RAMANA,J Dt.10.6.2008 Msv ... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 2 The Tahsildar, Saroornagar Mandal of Ranga Reddy District. 3 2CCs to Govt.Pleader for Revenue, High Court of A.P. Hyd. 4 2CD copies