1 IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.930 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1685 PF 2007 Tukaram Hirdekar & Ors. .. Appellants V/s. Mrs.Shevanti Gade & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.Akhilesh Dubey for the Appellants/Applicants. Mr.S.M.Oak for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : JULY 22ND, 2008. P.C. This Second Appeal arises out of the Judgment and decree dated 8th September, 2006 passed by the learned 2nd Ad-Hoc Additional District Judge, Raigad-Alibag. 2 2. The Appellants/Applicants herein are the original Defendants in Regular Civil Suit No.28 of 1992 filed by the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 herein for possession of agricultural lands at village Mohat and for partition of land at village Bhivghar and for mense profits of the said lands. In so far as the lands at Mohat are concerned, the said suit came to be decreed. But the suit in so far as partition to the land Bhivghar are concerned the same were dismissed. The Courts directed the computation of mense profits in respect of the land at Mohat. The decree was on the basis that the Appellants/Applicants have a right in respect of the lands at Mohat. 3. Being aggrieved by the decree passed by the Trial Court dated 31st January, 2000, the Defendants filed an Appeal being Regular Civil Appeal No.25 of 2000 which came to be dismissed and the decree passed by the Trial Court came to be confirmed. 4. The Lower Appellate Court has also recorded a finding that the suit was within limitation and was also properly valued. 3 5. Both the Courts below have recorded findings of fact on the basis of the material that was before them. In my view, the Second Appeal does not involve any substantial question of law and the same is, therefore, dismissed. 6. In view of the dismissal of the Second Appeal, the Civil Application No. 1685 of 2007 does not survive and is disposed of as such. [R.M.SAVANT, J.]