IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1104 (SS) of 2009 Virendra Prasad Sah …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents Mr. C.D. Bahuguna, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Shah, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Dated: November 10, 2009 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for direction to the respondent no. 2 to take decision on the representation dated 30.10.2008 (contained in Annexure-11 to the writ petition). During the course of the argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the representation of the petitioner may be decided by the respondent no. 2 expeditiously. Mr. N.P. Shah, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand does not have any objection to this prayer. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the parties, it is directed that respondent no. 2 shall decide the representation-dated 30.10.2008 (contained in Annexure-11 to the writ petition) of the petitioner expeditiously. With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of finally. No order as to costs. (V.K. Bist, J.) VKG 10.11.2009