IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.V.K.BALI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2006 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 W.A.No.2414 of 2006 ----------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).29318/2006 DATED 08/11/2006 ................... APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS 2 & 3:- --------------------------------------- 1. RAJAPPANACHARI, S/O.KRISHNAN ACHARI, MUNJANATTU PUTHENVEETTIL, KAVUMBHAGAM POST, CHERUVALLY KARA AND VILLAGE, KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK. 2. M.M.JOSEPH, S/O.MATHEN @ M.M.MATHEW, MANJAKKAL HOUSE, KAVUMBHAGAM POST, CHERUVALLY KARA AND VILLAGE, KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.P.KURUVILLA JACOB RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS AND FIRST PETITIONER:- --------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VAIDHUTHY BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, K.S.E.B., MAJOR ELECTRICAL SECTION, PONKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, K.S.E.B. MAJOR ELECTRICAL SECTION, PONKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 4. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, K.S.E.B. MAJOR ELECTRICAL SECTION, PONKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 5. KUNJUMON ALIAS SAJIMON, CONTRACTOR, KOLLAKUZHYIL HOUSE, CHERYVALLY POST AND VILLAGE, KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK. 6. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM. 7. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (GENERAL) AND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KOTTAYAM. 8. CHELLAMMA, W/O.LATE RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR, RAJESH BHAVAN, KAVUMBHAGAM POST, CHERUVALLY KARA AND VILLAGE, KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK. R1 TO R4 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.K.S.ANIL. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.K.Bali,C.J. & C.N.Ramachandran Nair,J. --------------------------------------------------- W.A.No.2414 of 2006 ------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 21st day of December, 2006 JUDGMENT V.K.Bali,C.J. (Oral) No adverse orders have been passed against the appellants, who are petitioners 2 and 3 in the original lis. In fact, all grievances of the petitioners are left open to be decided by the Additional District Magistrate, before whom the petitioners can even suggest alternative routes. In such a situation when no adverse orders have been passed and in fact the grievances of the petitioners, if any, are to be looked into, we do not find that it is a case where appeal at all should have been filed. No merits. Dismissed. I.A.1232 of 2006 does not survive. V.K.Bali Chief Justice C.N.Ramachandran Nair Judge vku/-