CWP No. 1089 of 2008. 28.8.2008. Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Central Government Counsel for respondents No. 1 & 2. CWP No. 1089 of 2008 & CMP No. 1664 of 2008. The grievance of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that though an ad-interim order was granted to the extent of status quo by an order dated 27th June, 2008 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh, however, on the subsequent date, the same was not extended. Though the response filed by the respondents was not taken on record and a direction was given to file a fresh response within the time prescribed, from the perusal of the impugned order, it indicates that the Tribunal has indicated that the interim relief application will be considered on next date i.e 25th July, 2008. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred this Writ Petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner informs that on the earlier occasion also, the case was adjourned before the Tribunal because of pendency of this matter. The impugned order is transfer of the petitioner from Shimla to Jodhpur. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the interest of justice will suffice, if this matter is expeditiously decided by the learned Tribunal. Accordingly, he does not press the present petition on merits. In the light of the above, let the Tribunal may consider and decide expeditiously on the next date of hearing. In case it would not be possible than interim relief application be considered and disposed of. With these observations, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications. The interim order dated July 17, 2008 is discharged. Copy dasti. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. 28th August, 2008. (Kuldip Singh), J. (ks)