wag 4V” 3 5,, 1N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR (MR) ' WRIT PETITION NoJ 3a Ims WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ’ INDIA PETITIONER Shem! Pmsad Suryavnmhi Aged about 38 yeats S/o Shri Dhnmni Suryavnmhi Chowkidm', Special Area Development AumorityKmm Dim Bunspm (MR) Vetsus RESPONDENTS z l. The Sm ofM_P. thmugh Secretary, Deptt. ofEnviroment, Govt ofMP. Vnllahh Bh'awan, Bhopal (M_P.) Spedal Are‘a Development Authority, Korba through its ChiefExecmive omcer, Korba, Dim Bilaspur (M.P.) Shri Raghuram Yadev S/o Late Shri Aghanlnl Yadav Lower Division Clerk, SADAKorm Dim Biiaspur (MR) "’%; ‘4$§ 37 —'z4r HIGH COURT OF CHHA’ITISGARH AT BILASPUR Wn'f Petition No. 1443 0f 1998 Petitiomsr; Shestal Prasad Stuyavanshi Versus Respondents: Stata of M.P. 8t. others Single Bench: Hon’blo Mr. Justice Satish K. Aglihctri. Shri Rajandra Tripathi, counsel for the petitioner. Shxi Sanjay K. Agrawal, counsel for fhe respondent No, 2. l; . None for the respondents No. 1, 3 and 4. 53C} ORAL ORDER LA. No. 683w 2004 ( 13th Februaly, 2006) This is an application for appropriate direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, The petitioney has tiled this petition impugning the. order dated 27:9. 1995, whereby the respondents No. 3 and 4 have been promoted to the post of Lower Division Clerk, ignoring claim of the petitioner. The petitioner has filed this application for grant of permission to ‘ make a representaiion before the appropriate authority. Application is ' allowed and the petitioner is at liberty to file a representation to the iconcemed authorities. The concerned authorities are directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of representation, if any, filed by ; the petitioner, In View of the foregoing, the writ petition stands disposed of. No 1 order as to costs. Sd/— i, ‘. . Satish K. Agnihoui t Judge Bablu %