Crl. Misc. No. M-10955 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-10955 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: July 28, 2010 Sushil Kumar and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. Bipan Ghai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Gahlawat, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Raghbir Chaudhary, Sr. DAG, Punjab, for respondent No.1. Ms. GK Mann, Advocate, for respondent No.2. GURDEV SINGH, J. Heard. Petitioners-Sushil Kumar and Rajinder Kumar Singla, have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for quashing of the FIR No. 214 dated 22.5.2009 registered at Police Station Kotwali, Patiala, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC and the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of the compromise entered into between them and Yogesh Modi-respondent No.2/complainant, who got lodged that FIR. The report of the Investigating Officer was called. An affidavit of one Balraj Singh DSP, City-1, Patiala, has been submitted. As per the deposition made in the affidavit, a detailed inquiry was conducted by Hans Crl. Misc. No. M-10955 of 2010 2 Raj, Inspector/SHO of Police Station Kotwali, after joining the parties, who came to the conclusion that they have voluntarily entered into the compromise in respect of the offences mentioned in the FIR. The report of that SHO and the statements of the parties have been made part of that affidavit. The FIR was got lodged by respondent No.2 in respect of the personal transactions entered into between him and the petitioner. Though all the offences are not compoundable, yet the parties could have entered into a compromise in respect of those offences and the FIR can be quashed on the basis thereof, as was held by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Cr.) 1052. In view of the compromise, so entered into between the parties, this petition is accepted, the above said FIR and the subsequent proceedings taken in pursuance thereof are ordered to be quashed. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. July 28, 2010 (GURDEV SINGH ) prem JUDGE