IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16657 of 2011 Dulal Goswami Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 24.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Sadar P.S. Case No. 292 of 2010 registered under Sections 379, 413, 414, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that from pipe line going from Assam to Oil Corporation, Barauni Oil was being siphon out by certain people, wWhen some accused persons were apprehended who disclosed the name of other accused persons including the petitioner. It is submitted by the leaned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence. It appears from the record that other apprehended accused persons have been granted regular bail by this Court. I see no reason for the learned court below not to give the same privilege to the petitioner and try to dispose off the regular bail 2 application of the petitioner preferably on the same day if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned C. J. M. Purnea in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 292 of 2010 at the cost of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)