^SIj'tiil^ l^p-ri^'! '^S^S'^i^ ^s.^^1 S.^' c -(c rV<^a BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (Cl N0. '731^ / 2011 PETITIONER ^ i V^A].,.. • ^rrrs"S^--'.. ^•w:l^b:i/v5'^:;::'-'""'' T'e^..--.v^^' ^e6..-- RESPONDENTS ^. '-/i^ , ^ ^ ^ ^^ •2 -. ^ts' ^^ Q€y Narayan Agrawal, S/o. Late Shri Ramdhan Agrawal, Aged about 45 years, R/o. Lailunga, District - Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) /2. Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) ^"3. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF 1NDIA ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRIT PETITION (QNo. 7316 of2011 Narayan Agrawal. RE8PONDENT8 VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WEHLPETITION UNDER AR3TCI^226jQF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. ^NN^ Present: Shri Sourabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 1 and 3. Shri Amn Sao, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. ORDER (Passed on 07th day ofDecember, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submite that the impugned notice dated 25.11.2011 (Amiexure P/l), for demolition of the alleged unauthorized constmction raised by the petitionen has been withdrawn by the respondent authorities. Thus, nothing survives fbr adjudication aiid this petition has becom^ infizfctuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side do not controvert the, above submission. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infmctuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit