IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 307 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3558 OF 2005 DUBEY VIMAL EDUCATION SOCIETY & ANR. ..PETITIONERS V/S DY. DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ANR. . .RESPONDENTS MRS. ANUPAMA B. SHAH, ADVOCATE, FOR THE PETITIONERS. NONE FOR THE RESPONDENTS. CORAM: J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 5TH JUNE, 2008. DATE : 5TH JUNE, 2008. DATE : 5TH JUNE, 2008. P.C. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioners point out that as per the order passed by this court on 23rd June 2006 the Dy. Director of Education had taken a decision and that decision was against the Petitioner. However that decision was not to be enforced for a period of 2 weeks as per the said order. However in violation of that and inspite of the order of the court, the said order of the Deputy Director was enforced within a period of 2 weeks. Therefore this contempt petition was filed and at the same time writ petition was also filed against the : 2 : authorisation order of the Dy. Director and that petition also was dismissed and even the SLP against that decision came to be dismissed. In such circumstances the petitioner does not want to press the contempt petition. In view of the above, the contempt petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. (J. H. BHATIA, J) (J. H. BHATIA, J) (J. H. BHATIA, J)