1 ABA : 661.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.661 OF 2011 Ramchandra Bhimrao Patil .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Mr. Mahindra Deshmukh, Advocate for applicant. Mrs. G.P. Mulekar, APP for State. Coram : Smt. R.P.SondurBaldota, J. Date : 2nd August, 2011 P.C. 1. The applicant is Police Patil of village Arewadi, Tal. Kavathemahankal, District Sangli. He has filed this application for anticipatory bail in connection with C.R. No. 48 of 2011 registered with Kavathemahankal Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 read with 34 Indian Penal Code. 2. Perusal of the FIR shows that the applicant has not been arrayed as one of the accused therein. It alleges that two persons by name Vitthal Appa Kolekar and Ramesh Waman 2 ABA : 661.2011 Kolekar posed themselves as sons of one Rajaram Bapu Kolekar, who has been missing since the year 1962. They procured false death certificate of Rajaram from Gram Panchayat, Dhanora showing that Rajaram had died on 7th March 1970. They also represented that one Gangubai who died on 6th March 1975, was the wife of Rajaram. On the basis of the false death certificates of Rajaram and Gangubai, the applicant issued heirship certificate to the two persons. 3. Since there are no specific allegation made against the applicant in the complaint, there can be no apprehension of his arrest in C.R. No.48 of 2011 registered with Kavathemahankal Police Station. 4. Apparently two factors induced the applicant to file the application for anticipatory bail, one is intimation to attend to the concerned police station. The other is intimation of departmental proceedings against him and his suspension from service. It is also alleged that there is some political rivalry involving the applicant. The learned APP states that the applicant has been called by the Police only for the purpose of an enquiry. Next suspension from the service, 3 ABA : 661.2011 cannot give rise to the apprehension of arrest in the criminal proceedings. Lastly the application filed contains no averments whatsoever as regards the political rivalry. It is obvious that the apprehension felt by the applicant is misconceived. Hence, the application is dismissed. 5. In the event, any material comes on record in the course of investigation to implicate the applicant in the complaint, he is at liberty to file a fresh application for anticipatory bail. (Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J)