IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.6460 of 2011 Date of Decision : April 08, 2011. Navdeep Saini .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner competed and was selected for appointment as E.T.T. Teacher but no appointment was given to him even when the candidates lower in merit were allegedly appointed in August, 2006. The aggrieved petitioner represented the authorities and having realized their mistake, they appointed the petitioner in November, 2006. The petitioner's grievance is that in the seniority list/list of appointees, he is shown to have been appointed in December, 2006. He accordingly seeks a mandamus for his placement in the said list as per his merit position. The above stated relief has also been sought by the petitioner vide a representation dated 22.3.2011 (Annexure P-4) to which any response is still awaited. C.W.P.No .6460 of 2011 2 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to consider the claim of the petitioner as contained in the afore- mentioned representation dated 22.3.2011 and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. April 08, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE