IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.49 of 1999 Date of Decision. 28.09.2010 National Insurance Company Limited, SCO No.85-86, Sector 17-D, Chandigarh (insurer of Bus No.CH-01-H-9065) and another ......Appellants Versus Nirmal Singh son of Diwan Singh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr.Tajinder Pal Singh, Advocate for Mr. Subhash Goyal, Advocate for the appellants. None for the respondents. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The insurance company is challenging the award on the issue of quantum. There was no permission granted under Section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act to contest the case on the issue of quantum. The insurance company cannot maintain the appeal, in view of the language employed under the Act and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Nicolletta Rohtagi and others 2002 ACJ 1950. 2. The appeal is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 28, 2010 Pankaj*