-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.129 OF 2006 Brashtachar Nirmoolan Sanghatana Mumbai & Anr. : Petitioners V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. : Respondents ... Mr.Yogesh H. Ameta i/b. Anand Poojari for the petitioners. Mr.Ravi Kadam, Advocate General, with Mr.K.R.Belosey, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for respondent no.1. Mr.T.N.Subramaniam, Senior Advocate, with Ms Shobha Ajitkumkar for respondent no.2. Mr.Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate i/b. Y.Chaudhari for respondent no.4. ... CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & S.A.BOBDE,JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 06, 2008. P.C. 1. On 10.10.2007, the case was adjourned at the request of the counsel for the petitioners, by way of last chance. Again on 21.11.2007, the petitioners requested for adjournment on the ground that they want to place some material on record. No material has been placed on record and today also adjournment is sought. Adjournment is -: 2 :- declined. 2. We have perused the record and heard the larned counsel for the respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioners has not chosen to address. The main relief sought in the petition is that this Court should order demolition of unauthorised constructions at C.T.S. no.782(Pt) and 782/1 to 25 of village Andheri, F.P. no.17, TPS-I, Andheri at Madhavdas Amarshi Road, Andheri (West), Mumbai. The Corporation has filed counter affidavit in which it has been clearly stated that constructions are permitted by sanctions granted by the Municipal Corporation. There is also a Certificate produced, being Occupancy Certificate issued by the Executive Engineer, Building Proposal. Since the constructions are authorised constructions and the permission granted by the Municipal Corporation is not under challenge, we find no merit in the Public Interest Litigation which is, accordingly, dismissed. (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (S.A. BOBDE, J.)