IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3667 of 2010 Ashok Tiwari S/O Late Baijnath Tiwari R/O Vill.- Fatehpur, P.S.- Parwalpur, Distt.- Nalanda Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Deptt., Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The District Superintendent Of Education, Distt.- Nalanda 4. The Block Education Extension Officer, Ekingsarai-2, Distt.- Nalanda 5. The Jila Shikshak Niyojan Apilye Pradhikar, Distt.- Nalanda (Bihar Sharif) Through Its Member 6. Menaka Kumari D/O Devendra Choudhary R/O Vill.- Fatehpur, P.S.- Parwalpur, Distt.- Nalanda, At Present Posted As Panchayat Shikshak At Primary School, Fatehpur, Distt.- Nalanda ----------- 2 28.06.2011 Heard Mr. Sharad Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Satish Kumar, learned A.C. to S.C.1 for the State. The petitioner happens to be the member of the Vidyalaya Shiksha Samiti of Primary School, Fatehpur. He seeks to challenge the appointment of the Private respondent No.6 to the post of Panchayat Siksha Mitra and her subsequent absorption against the post of Panchayat Shikshak. He questions the appointment basically on the issue of qualification. The matter travelled up to the appellate authority constituted under the rules framed in the year 2006 and the appellate authority has affirmed the appointment. It is the said order of the appellate authority placed at Annexure-9 dated 19.11.2009 which is put to question before this Court. It is not contested rather admitted that the petitioner is not a claimant to the post. The fact is also taken note off by the appellate authority in its order under challenge. The position is also admitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 2 That being the position, this Court is of the opinion that an appointment to the post can only be questioned by a person interested and contesting the post and not by any stranger to the selection process. In the circumstances, this Court finds a complete absence of locus in the writ application filed by the petitioner. Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J.)