1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.462/2009 Parmeshwar Alias Pramod s/o Govinda Damodar ...Versus... State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Police Station Hiwarkhed Tq. Telhara Distt. Akola - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - [Shri Mohta, Adv. for applicant] [Shri D.B. Patel, APP for non-applicant] CORAM : A. B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 19.03 2009. Heard. Learned Counsel for applicant submits that the injuries i.e. said to have been caused by his client are only by stick and therefore, offence of murder cannot be made out. I have perused the case diary produced before me by learned A.P.P. and I find that the injures were caused on the head of the deceased which ultimately resulted into death and there are fractures to mandible etc.. Looking to the nature of offence committed by the applicant, it would be appropriate to direct the trial Court to commence the trial as early as possible. There are three eye witnesses and the medical evidence prima facie shows involvement of the applicant. In view of this, I make the following order. 2 Criminal Application is rejected. However, the trial Court is directed to decide the Session Trial within a period of eight months from today. It is made clear that the observations made above are prima facie in nature and shall not influence the trial Judge. JUDGE ssw