IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 9344 of 2008 Decided on: 6.1.2011 Chuni Lal Gupta ……….Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others ...….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Bimal Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he is entitled to leave encashment of 42 days. However, it has come in the reply that the petitioner is entitled to leave encashment of 26 days. 2. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release the amount towards leave encashment of 26 days to the petitioner, if not already paid, within a period of eight weeks' from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgement by the petitioner. No costs. January 6, 2011. (Rajiv Sharma) (hl) Judge 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.