-B- TTISGARH AT BILASPUi l'p< 1. Mathurala! aged 45 yrs, S/o. Ramdayal, R/'o Mudapar, Post Korba Colliery, dist: Korba (C.G.) w S/o Hari Singh R/o Mudapar, Post Korba Colliery, dist : Korba (C.G.) 3. Rampai S/o Budhram R/o Mudapar, Post Korba Colliery, dist : Korba (C.G.) 4. Mohan S/o Mangal R/o Mudapar, Post Korba Colliery, dist : Korba (C.G.) 5. S. Tigga S/o K. Tigga, R/o Mudapar, Post Korba Colliery, dist : Korba (C.G.) Dharma Rao S/o K. Puttan R/o Mudapar, Post Korba Coiliery, dist : Korba (C.G.) 2. Centrat Govt. industrial Tribunal, Jabalpur. Chief General Manager, SECL, Korba Area, Post: Korba Coliiery, Dist: Korba (C.G.) iito Hlgh Court C.G. Rules. 2007 Present: Shri Gary Mukhopadhyay, learned counsel for the appellants. sf The following judgment of the Court was passed Shri Gary is heard on I.A. counsei tor tne ap an application for condonation of the deiay in fiiing the writ appeal. 2) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counse! for the appellants and the grounds taken in the application, we are satisfied that the appellants have succeeded in showing sufficient cause for the delay in filing the writ appeal. 3) I.A. No.01 of 2010, therefore, is allowed and the delay in fiiina the writ appeal is herebv condoned. 4) Shri Gary Mukhopadhyay, iearned counsel forthe appeilants is heard on admission. >) The appellants have filed this writ appeal against the impugned orderdated 01-04-2010, passed inW.P. No.161/2005. 6) The appeliants/ petitioners had filed the writ petition for the following reiiefs: "(i) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct to call for the entire records which are in possession of (ii) This Hon'ble Court be further pleased to quash the imDuaned order bv an aDproDriate writ. ,j>^ i*v,,^VZi B '%^:^'" ^ ^' ^s' ^-w't jg: (iii) This Hon'ble Court be further pleased to hoid that the pet'rtioners are entitled for regularizatlon with effect from retrospective effect from 1 984. (iv) This Hon'ble Court be further pleased to direct the respondents to make pavment of consequential benefits on regularization ofthe petitioners. (v) This Hon'ble Court be further pleased to direct the respondents to treat the petitioners as Members of Coal Mines Provident Fund and deduct contribution towards (vi) This Hon'ble Court be further pleased to direct the respondents to make payment of Coal Mines Provident Funds to the petitioners. (vii) Cost of the petitioner be awarded to the pstitioners. (viii) Any other relief/reliefs, writ/writs, order/orders, directlon/directions as this Hon'ble Court deem fit in the facts and circumstances ofthe case." 7) The petitioners, thus in substance, were seeklng quashing of the order dated 28-05-2004, passed bv the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur In Case No.CGIT/LC(R)(105)/1992; a direction to the respondents for their regularization with effect from 1 984; and a further direction to pay them the consequentia! benefits. 8) Learned Single Judge on a thorough consideration of the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioners did not find any good ground warranting interference in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 and/or supervisory jurisdiction under Artic.Ie 227 of the Constitution of !ndia. Learned Singie Judge, ^.-. s-'.-x. therefore, dismissed the appellants' writ petition vide impugned orderdated 01-04-2010. 9) Shri Gary Mukhopadhyay, learned counsel for the appellants vehemently argued that the Central Government industrial Tribunal has erred in passing the order impugned in the writ petition without affording sufficient opportunity to the appellants and that the learned Single Judge has erred in not giving due weight to the above submission. 10) Learned counsel for the appellants could not point out from any of the order-sheets of the Tribunal that opportunity sought on behalf of the appeltants was denied bv the Tribunal. 11) We, therefore, do not find any infirmity either in the order passed by the Tribunai or the impugned order whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the appeltants' writ petition. 12) The writ appeal, therefore, Is liabie to be dismissed and is herebv dismlssed summarilv. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge subbu