:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 105 OF 2006 Suri Javed Munavar Khan ...Applicant. V/s The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. --- Ms. Anjali Patil for the applicant. Ms. M.M. Deshmukh, APP for the State. --- CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J. DATE: DATE: DATE: 23rd January, 2006 23rd January, 2006 23rd January, 2006 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is arrested in connection with the C.R. No.97 of 2004 registered by D.C.B. C.I.D.. It is alleged that the complainant was kidnapped and was taken to Colombo on the pretext of giving him finance. 3. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is no evidence against the present applicant and that he is in jail since last one year. 4. The learned APP appearing on behalf of the State, however, has invited my attention to the statement of :2: telephone calls which are with the anti-extortion cell which indicate that the applicant had made phone call to one of the persons whose number is maintained by the anti-extortion cell. It is also submitted by the learned APP for the State that the applicant had connection with underworld and statements are made to that effect by some of the witnesses. 5. In my view, this is not a fit case for grant of bail. Application for bail is rejected. Hearing of the case, however, is expedited. V.M. V.M. V.M. KANADE, J. KANADE, J. KANADE, J.