THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.11560 OF 2011 DATED 27TH APRIL, 2011 Between: Katta Gundaiah Naidu and others. … Petitioners and Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Its District Registrar (Stamps & Registration), YSR Kadapa District, Kadapa, and another. … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.11560 OF 2011 O R D E R The complaint of the petitioners in this writ petition is with regard to the action of the Sub-Registrar, Pullampet SRO, Pullampet, YSR Kadapa District, the second respondent, in keeping their conveyance deed pending registration as Document No.P6/2011. The learned Assistant Government Pleader produced the written instructions received by him from the Sub-Registrar, Pullampet, under letter dated 26.04.2011, wherein it is stated that the said document was kept pending registration as the property mentioned therein was involved in Writ Petition No.6749 of 2009 pending before this Court. This Court had occasion to consider this very issue in Writ Petition No.4394 of 2011, wherein a document was kept pending registration basing on the Circular dated 10.03.2010 issued by the Commissioner and Inspector General of Registration and Stamps, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, which stipulated that Registering Officers were not to go ahead with registration of a document in the event the High Court or any other Civil Court restrained a person from alienating the property which was the subject matter of such document, and the same was brought to the notice of the Registering Officers. In the present case, the interim order passed in W.P.No.6749 of 2009 is to the effect that respondents 1 to 3 therein viz., George Washington, B.Aurnodhaya Kumar and K.Premraj, were injuncted from alienating or creating any third party interest in respect of the E- Schedule properties in O.P.No.34 of 2004 on the file of the learned V Additional District Judge, Tirupathi. In that view of the matter, unless the petitioners in this case are claiming through or are in any way to be categorized as the agents or representatives of the three persons, who suffered the above interim order in W.P.No.6749 of 2009, the Circular instructions aforestated cannot be brought into play for the purpose of refusing registration of their document. Such being the case, the mere pendency of W.P.No.6749 of 2009 in connection with the same property but in the context of some third parties, would not be reason enough for the Sub- Registrar, Pullampet, to keep the document pending registration. There shall accordingly be a direction to the Sub-Registrar, Pullampet, YSR Kadapa District, to complete the registration process in respect of the document kept pending as Document No.P6/2011 and release the same. The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. In the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs. -------------------------- SANJAY KUMAR,J 27TH APRIL, 2011. Note: Issue copy in two days. (B/O)PGS/VGSR