1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Second day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12610 of 2011 CHINNATHAMBI @ SIVASAMY ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.2 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TOWN POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI, IN CR.NO.154 OF 2011, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.N.RAVISHANKAR VALLATHARASU Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Addl.Public Prosecutor( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) and 392 IPC in Crime No.154 of 2011, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was enlarged on anticipatory bail at the time of granting anticipatory bail the provisions of law has been wrongly mentioned as Section 394 IPC but the case has been registered under Sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) and 392 IPC and hence he apprehends arrest and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) would submit that the petitioner already enlarged on bail in the same Crime No.154 of 2011 at the time the provision has been mentioned as Section 394 IPC, but as per the FIR the case has been registered under Sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) and 392 IPC. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Judicial Magistrate, Pudukkottai, and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 5. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 22/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI. 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI,PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/S.N.RAVISHANKAR VALLATHARASU Advocate SR.No.32663 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12610 of 2011 Date :22/09/2011 PA/23.09.2011/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/