IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 5450 of 2008 Between: Smt K. Narayanamma, W/o.Narayanappa, R/o.Jowkala Kothapalli Village, Amadagur Mandal, Ananthapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Collector & District Magistrate, Ananthapur. 2 The Joint Collector, Ananthapur. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Penukonda,Ananthapur District. 4 The Tahsildar, Amadagur Mandal, Ananthapur District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.RANGA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to set aside order, dated 01.02.2007 passed by respondent No.3 whereby the petitioner’s authorization to run fair price shop was suspended and a notice was issued to the petitioner for cancellation. Heard Sri N.Ranga Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies. The petitioner’s fair price shop authorization was suspended while issuing a show cause notice to the petitioner for cancelling the authorization on 12 charges by respondent No.3 vide his order, dated 01.02.2007. The said order was questioned by the petitioner in appeal before respondent No.2 and the said appeal was dismissed on 05.04.2007. The petitioner filed a revision petition before respondent No.1, which came to be disposed of by him vide his order, dated 05.10.2007. In his order, respondent No.1 having referred to the gravity of the charges, declined to interfere with the orders of respondent Nos.3 and 2 and further directed respondent No.3 to conclude the enquiry as early as possible and within a period of two months. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite lapse of two months’ period, respondent No.3 failed to complete the enquiry and pass orders therein. Since the petitioner’s grievance appears to be reasonable and legitimate, the writ petition is disposed of. Respondent No.3 is directed to complete the enquiry and pass orders within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.7066 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 14th MARCH, 2008 Note: issue copy by a week. B/o kvni