5.CRA.399-08 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.399 OF 2008 Shri Man Mohan Sharma. ..Applicant Versus Ms.Indu Manmohan Sharma and another. ..Respondents. .... None for the Applicant. Mr.R.D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for Respondent No.1. .... CORAM : A.R. JOSHI,J. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2009 P.C.:- 1. None for the applicant-husband. Similar was the state of affair on 8.7.2009, 4.9.2009, 10.9.2009 and 24.9.2009. As such, it appears that the applicant has lost interest in the present Civil Revision Application. Learned Advocate Mr.Suryawanshi for the respondent-wife is present. 2. Apparently, the decree of divorce exparte granted in favour of the applicant-husband and granted by Haryana Court has been stayed in Appeal filed by respondent No.1-wife and such an order was passed by the Punjab & Haryana High Court. In the meantime, respondent No.1-wife preferred an application 5.CRA.399-08 2 under Section 18 of Adoption and Maintenance Act for maintenance. Said application was challenged by applicant- husband. In view of the provisions under Order VII Rule 11 of Civil Procedure Code, divorced wife is not entitled for such maintenance under Section 18 of Adoption and Maintenance Act. Reportedly, the decree of divorce is stayed by Punjab & Haryana High Court and this is told to this Court by learned Advocate for respondent No.1 on instructions. He further submitted that evidence in the said application under Section 18 of Adoption and Maintenance Act filed by respondent No.1 is also over and the matter is fixed for arguments and judgment. It appears that under these circumstances, the applicant must have lost interest in the present Civil Revision Application. Even otherwise also in view of the above position made known to this Court, there is nothing to interfere in the impugned order under the revisional jurisdiction of this Court. Hence, the present Civil Revision Application is dismissed. (A.R.JOSHI,J)