1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Thursday, the Twentieth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD)Nos.13778 & 13836 of 2011 MAHATHEVAN :PETITIONER / ACCUSED A2 IN CRL OP(MD)NO.13778/11 C.PARAMAN :PETITIONER / ACCUSED A1 IN CRL OP(MD)NO.13836/11 -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, USILAMPATTI TOWN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. CR.NO. 569/2011:RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT IN BOTH CRL OP'S For Petitioner : M/S. N.ANANTHAPADMANABAN Advocate in Crl.OP(MD)No.13778/11. For Petitioner : M/S. N.RANJITH, Advocate in Crl.OP(MD)No.13836/11. For Respondent : MR. K.S.DURAIPANDI, in all Petitions. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PETITIONS FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. ORDER:The Court Made the following order:- The petitioners are the accused Nos.2 and 1 respectively in Crime No.569 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 406, 420 and 506(ii) of IPC. They were arrested on 22.09.2011 and they have come forward with this petition seeking bail. 2.According to the case of prosecution, these petitioners along with other accused made false promise to the de-facto complainant to secure job abroad and received a sum of Rs.5,00,000/-. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would deny the above allegations. However, they would submit that these petitioners are prepared to pay a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- each to the de-facto complainant without prejudice to their defence in the case. 4.As a matter of fact, today, learned counsel appearing for both the petitioners have filed separate memos to the said effect. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5.In the said memo, they have stated as follows:- “Crl.OP.(MD)No.13778 of 2011: The petitioner herein is ready to deposit amount for a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- to the concerned Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Usilampatti. Crl.OP(MD)No.13836 of 2011: The petitioner herein to ready to deposit amount for a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- to the concerned Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Usilampatti. 6.The learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that they have got no objection for the de-facto complainant to withdraw the said amount from the Lower Court on the same being deposited by the petitioners. 7.The said statement is recorded. 8.In view of the above, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioners, but with stringent conditions. 9.In the result, this petition is ordered and bail is granted to the petitioners on the following conditions:- (i)the petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) wit two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No:I, Usilampatti; and (ii)the petitioners shall report before the respondent police, every day at 10.30 a.m. until further orders; and (iii)each of the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- before the Lower Court and on the said amount being deposited, the de-facto complainant shall be at liberty to withdraw the same. sd/- 20/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Usilampatti, Madurai District. 2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai. 3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Usilampatti Town Police Station, Madurai District. 4.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Madurai. +1CC to M/S. N.ANANTHAPADMANABAN Advocate SR.No.36378. +1CC TO M/S. N. RANJITH, ADVOCATE SR.NO.36383. RP/21.10.2011/2P/8C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD)Nos.13778 & 13836 of 2011 Date :20/10/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/