1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 1093 OF 2000 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2432 OF 1998 IN SUIT NO. 1485 OF 198 Shantilal Chakubhai Rathod & Anr. .. Appellant.. Vs. Satish Shankar Gupta. .. Respondent. Mr. R.C. Shah for Appellant. Mr. Vinod Kothari i/by M/s. Apex Car Partners for the Respondent. CORAM : J. N. PATEL & SMT. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ DATE : 24TH AUGUST, 2009 P.C. : The parties have tendered the consent terms. The learned counsel appearing for the parties state that the consent terms have been read over and explained to the parties who have 2 affixed their signatures on the consent terms after understanding the terms and conditions on which they have agreed to settle the suit amongst themselves. The parties are personally present in the Court. They confirm that they have understood the terms and conditions and they want this Court to dispose of the suit as per the consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked X for “ ” identification. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably settled the subject matter of Suit No. 1485 of 1998, we dispose of the appeal in terms of the minutes of the order. The appellant would be entitled to refund of court fees, if any, a sper the rules. ( J. N. PATEL, J.) (SMT. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)