^^3 £TS> i0N B@^ IN THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION f S ) No. B^BS3/2009 PETITIONERS » RESPONDENTS 1. Mukund Rao Ramteke S/o Shri. Yeshwant Rao Ramteke Aged about 38 Years, Unemployed, Residing at: Rajkumar Quarter No. 85 Railway Colonv, DONGARGARH, District. Rajnandgaon (CG) 2. Parasram Banwari S/o Shri. Kaliram Banwari Aged about 45 Years, Unemployed, Residing at: Rajkumar Quarter No. 85 Railway Colony, DONGARGARH, District. Rajnandgaon (CG). VERSUS 1. Union of India Through : The General Manager, South East Central Railway, Bilaspur Zone, BILASPUR (CG) 2. The Divisional Railway Mlanager, South East Central Railway, Nagpur Division, NAGPUR (MS) 3. The Divil. Commercial JVIanager, South East Central Railway, Nagpur Division, NAGPUR (MS) 4. The Chief Station Manager, S.E.C.Railway, RAJNANDGAON District: Rajnandgaon (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^^ HIGH CTWKT OP CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPttR SB : HON»BLB8HRI JU8TICB PRITINKBR DIWAKBR PBTITIONBRS W.P.tSI N0. 38S9/2009 Rao Ramteke & Versus RBSPONDBNT8 Miikund Anoftier Union of India & Otfaers WRIT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLB 226 QF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Aooearance: Shri B.P.Rao, counselfor the petitfonera. Ms. Naushina Afi±iAli, Standing Comisel for fhc SECR. ORAL ORDBR (27.07.2009) Witfa ffcie consent of counsel appearmg forfhe parties, fhie matter is taken up for final hearing, Counsel appearing for the respondente/SECR submits fhat fhere is no legal impediment iu providing appUcation forms for consideration of Ucensee CooUes/Porters fcrthe post of Gangman aad fhe saiiie shafl be provided to fhiem, However, she clarijSes that fcssuaiice of appUcation forms alone shatt not confer any right on the applicaats to claim. appoiataient In view ofabove submission made by leanied couiisel for tihe SECR, it is not necessaiy to pass any order at fhis stage m fhis petition. The petition is accordmgly, disposedof. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge