BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08.11.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU WP(MD)No.724 of 2011 & MP(MD)No.1 of 2011 K.A.Anthony :Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni District. 2.The Inspector of Police,The District Crime Branch, Theni District (Theni). 3.S.Salethammal :Respondents PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the first and second respondents not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioner and third respondent by the way of harassment. For Petitioner :Mr.P.Muthusamy For Respondents:Mr.M.Govindan for R1 & R2,Special Government Pleader Mr.S.Kadarkarai for R3 ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent by way of harassing the petitioner. 2.When the matter came up on 20.01.2011, this Court granted an interim injunction. 3.The civil dispute mentioned by the petitioner relates to patta transfer and it cannot be considered as a civil dispute. On the contrary, on notice from this Court, it is pointed that the third respondent has given a criminal complaint, which is registered as First Information Report in Cr.No.4 of 2011 and in that First Information Report, it is stated that already an injunction order is pending against the petitioner in O.S.No.150 of 2007 filed by the third respondent. The complaint leads to the petitioner illegally registering a gift deed before the Sub Registrar Office at Devaram. 4.In any event, the petitioner has not specified any civil dispute initiated by him. On the contrary, the civil suit is filed by the third respondent and a criminal case has also been given by the third respondent Even in the affidavit the petitioner has not described as to what is meant by him as harassment. In the body of the affidavit he merely states that the second respondent has called for an enquiry in respect of the criminal case registered against him. It cannot be said as harassment. 5.The Station House Officer is bound to conduct enquiry on the complaint registered against the petitioner. Unless the petitioner does not say what is meant by harassment, the question of maintaining the present writ petition will not arise. Therefore, the writ petition will stand dismissed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AS) / TRUE COPY / Sub Assistant Registrar To:1.The Superintendent of Police,Theni District. 2.The Inspector of Police,The District Crime Branch,Theni District (Theni). +1CC to Mr.S.Kadarkarai, Advocate. SR.No.38469. +1CC to The Special Government Pleader. SR.No.38489. RP/21.11.2011/1P/5C. Order made in WP(MD)No.724 of 2011 & MP(MD)No.1 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/