1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE APPEAL NO.118 OF 2006 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.35 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.628 OF 2005 B.B.Shetty Appellant vs. Devanshu P. Vaidya & ors. Respondents Mr.D.D.Madon, Senior Advocate i/b.M/s.Mulla & Mulla for the appellant. CORAM : R.M. LODHA & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 28th February 2006 P.C. Heard Mr.D.D.Madon, the learned senior counsel for the appellant. 2. Having considered the available material, we are of the view that the impugned order does not call for any interference. However, in our view, the two notices of motions being Notice of Motion Nos.702/2005 and 35/2006 deserve to be heard at an early date. 3. We, accordingly, request the learned motion Judge to hear and decide both the notices of motion as early as 2 possible. Liberty is granted to the appellant to apply to the learned motion Judge for fixing the date of hearing of the aforesaid two notices of motion. (R. (R. (R. M. LODHA, J.) M. LODHA, J.) M. LODHA, J.) (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)