^\v(> I'f ^^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR PETITIONER CONTEMPT CASE (C) No. 205/2009 Shri Krishna Agrawal, aged about 52 years, s/o Late Shri G.D. Agrawal, Sub-Engineer E 85 M, Office of 8.D.0. E 8& M, F.0.M. Sub-Division, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Jagdalpur (C. G). RESPONDENT Vs. Shri Kanwar Ali, Under Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Secretariat, D.K.S. Bhawan, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1971 READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Mr. V. G. Tamaskar, coynsel for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, counsel for the respondent. ORAL ORDER (18.02.2010) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard. The petitioner was working as Sub-Engineer in Jagdalpur. One R.S. Netam Sub-Divisional Officer was transferred at the place of the petitioner, but no orders in relation to the petitioner, was passed. The petitioner, therefore, filed W.P(S). No.3669/2008 and an interim order was passed in favour of the petitioner on 28th of July, 2008. However, in the meanwhile, the petitioner was transferred from Jagdalpur to Raipur vide order dated 30.06.2009. Mr. V. G. Tamaskar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that even after grant of interim relief the petitioner was transferred to Raipur, therefore, he had to file the contempt petition. F/7 ^. CONT. CASE fC) No.205/2009 _ Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, learned counsel for the respon^ submits that the reply on behalf of the respondent has been filed. He submits that by order dated 22.8.2009, the transfer order of the petitioner from Jagdalpur to Raipur was cancelled and the petitioner was allowed to continue at Jagdalpur. Earlier to it, since the posting order of Mr. Netam was cancelled, therefore, the writ petition ultimately was disposed of on 07.07.2009. Mr. Shrivastava, further submits that a mass transfer order was issued and the interim stay granted in favour of the petitioner was not in the knowledge of the concerned authorities, therefore, the name of the petitioner was also included in the said order. Since the transfer of the petitioner has already been cancelled and the petitioner is allowed to continue at Jagdalpur, therefore, I do not deem it necessary to proceed further in this matter. Accordingly, proceedings of contempt initiated against the respondent are dropped at this stage. Sd/- SunilKumar Sinha Judge