.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1664 OF 1995 Jitendra Karsan Padaya and Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus The Registrar, Chief Metropolitan Magistrate’s Court and Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr.A.S.Karwande, Advocate for the Petitioners. Smt.S.M.Dandekar, A.G.P., for the Respondents-State. .... CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 06, 2006. DECEMBER 06, 2006. DECEMBER 06, 2006. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.P. for the respondents. 2. Both the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.P. for the respondents categorically state that the issue involved in the present Petition is squarely covered by our Judgments in Writ Petition No.1680 of 1994 dated 7th September, 2004 and Writ Petition No.1779 of 1994 dated 4th November, 2004. .[2]. 3. Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioners are entitled to be treated as permanent employees and are also entitled to all the benefits which the permanent employees are entitled to. 4. Rule is made absolute accordingly. 5. Issuance of certified copy expedited. [DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]