: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.194 OF 2009 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.499 OF 2008 Parayil Krishnan Kesavan & Anr. .. Applicants V/s. Anwar Ibrahim Memon & Anr. .. Respondents Ms. Manorama Mohanty i/b. S.K. Srivastav & Co. for the Applicants. Mr. Sagar Joshi for the Respondents. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 3 RD MARCH, 2010. P.C.: 1. The applicants, who are the respondents in the Civil Revision Application, have moved this Court contending that the applicants in the Civil Revision Application, i.e. the respondents herein, should be directed to deposit the amount quantified by the Competent Authority every month in this Court. According to the applicants, the suit premises have been purchased by them for a consideration of Rs.5 lacs. The respondents also claim to have purchased the same suit premises. However, there is a finding of the competent : 2 : authority that the applicants herein are the owners of the suit premises and that there is a relationship of licensor and licensee between them and the respondent No.1. 2. Undoubtedly, the present Civil Revision Application has been admitted. However, in my view, it would be appropriate to direct the respondents to deposit Rs.2,400/- per month in this Court during the pendency of the Civil Revision Application in view of judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. Vs. Federal Motors (P) Ltd., reported in (2005) 1 SCC 705. This deposit shall be invested in a Nationalized Bank every six months.