BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Ninth day of June Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.S.RAMANATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.7701 of 2011 1 M.S.MURUGAN 2 G.KESASVAN ..PETITIONERS Vs. STATE REP.BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DEVATHANAPATTI POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT. CR.NO.89 OF 2011 ..RESPONDENT For Petitioners : M/S. M.PONNIAH Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 420, 468, 471 of IPC in Crime No.89 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence seek anticipatory bail. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have not committed any offences and even according to the FIR, the documents were executed by the accused Nos. 1 to 6. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the property originally belonged to one Sudalaimuthu Nadar and he died in the year 1990 and thereafter, his wife and mother were enjoying the property and after their death, the de-facto complainant is enjoying the property and it is her ancestral property and the first accused sold the property as if, it is his property. 4. Heard Mr.M.Ponniah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.A.Ramar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the second petitioner is working as https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Thalapari and as per the allegations in the FIR that the first petitioner gave advise and the second petitioner only helped the other accused to execute the sale deed and the other accused were granted anticipatory bail, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Periakulam and on each of them executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 29/06/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PERIAKULAM. 2 -Do-Thro' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THENI. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DEVATHANAPATTI POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S. M.PONNIAH Advocate SR.No.20564 akm/29.06.11 /2p-6c/ ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.7701 of 2011 Date :29/06/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/