IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWAR WRIT PETITION NO : 7443 of 1995 Between: 1 Bunga Kalyanam S/o.Naidu Mediveda PACS Ravikamatham Mandalam Visakhapatnam Dist. 2 Jerripotula Appa Rao S/o.Durgaiah Mediveda PACS Ravikamatham Mandalam Visakhapatnam Dist. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Commissioner of Co-operation Registrar of Co-operative Societies, A.P Hyderabad. 2 Dist Co-operative Officer, Visakhapatnam. 3 Divisional Co-operative Officer, Yelamanchili Visakhapatnam District. 4 Special Officer, Mediveda PACS Ravikamatham Mandalam, Visakhapatnam District. 5 Pathivada Chinnamnaidu S/o.Chinnam Naidu Medivada PACS Ravikamatam Mandalam Visakhapatnam District. (R5 impleaded as per court order dt.15-6-1998 in W.P.M.P.No.33610 of 1997) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the of the 1st respondent in Memo Rc.No.9870/95 PACS/K1 dt.15-2-1995 and the consequential order passed by the 4th respondent in Rc.No.1/95/Special dt.24-3-1995 as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and without and the same may be set aside and direct the respondents to continue the petitioners in posts they are holding. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.P.KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for Respondents 1 to 3: GP FOR COOPERATION Counsel for Respondent No.4: Mr. D.V. Bhadram Counsel for Respondent No.5: Mr. E.V. Bhagiratha Rao The Court made the following : ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed with the prayer as follows: For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioners herein pray that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the order of the 1st respondent in Memo Rc.No.9870/95 PACS/K1 dt.15-2-1995 and the consequential order passed by the 4th respondent in Rc.No.1/95/Special dt.24-3-95 is illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and the same may be set aside and direct the respondents to continue the petitioners in the posts they are holding.” When the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that a batch of writ petitions with the prayer identical to the prayer in the present writ petition were disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the first respondent for appropriate relief. In the circumstances, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the first respondent for appropriate relief. No costs. _____________________ J. CHELAMESWAR, J. 2nd December, 2004 js. To 1 The Commissioner of Co-operation Registrar of Co-operative Societies, A.P Hyderabad. 2 Dist Co-operative Officer, Visakhapatnam. 3 Divisional Co-operative Officer, Yelamanchili Visakhapatnam District. 4 Special Officer, Mediveda PACS Ravikamatham Mandalam, Visakhapatnam District. 5 2 CCs to G.P. for Cooperation, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. 6 2 CD copies.