IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.11467 of 2006 Between: Grandhi Mallikarjun Rao … Petitioner And The District Collector and Magistrate, West Godavari District, Eluru & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri C.V.R. Rudra Prasad Counsel for respondents 1&2: AGP for Home Counsel for respondent No.3: Sri M.S. Ramachandra Rao This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11467 of 2006 ORDER:- The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that his representations filed before respondent Nos.1 and 2 for taking action against respondent No.3 for allegedly exhibiting indecent movies were not considered. The Managing Partner of respondent No.3 filed a counter affidavit in which he submitted that members belonging to Koratani family, who have got share in the business of running the theatre, are in the management of the theatre and that if any indecent movies are exhibited, he is not responsible for the same. No counter affidavits are filed by respondent Nos. 1 and 2. In my considered view, interests of justice would be met if respondent Nos.1 and 2 are directed to consider the representations said to have been made by the petitioner and on such consideration, if it is found that respondent No.3 is indulging in exhibition of indecent movies, they shall initiate appropriate action to prevent exhibition of such movies, after notice to the persons, who are likely to be affected by such action. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.23907 of 2008 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 03.06.2009 ES