1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5098 OF 2009 Mr. Ravindra Sopanrao Ghanvat .. Petitioner Vs Tata Motors Ltd, Pimpri .. Respondent P.S. Mohalkar for the petitioner CORAM : Smt. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATE : 24th August, 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner came to be terminated on 15th February, 1999. He filed complaint before the Labour Court, Pune. The said complaint came to be dismissed by order dated 21st January, 2006. Being aggrieved thereby, he preferred revision before the Industrial Court at Pune. The said revision came to be dismissed by order of the Industrial Court dated 18th August, 2006. Both these orders have been challenged in this petition. However, this petition is filed on 10th June, 2009 i.e after the delay of almost three years. Only reason for the delay is Rma wp5098-09.sxw 2 found in paragraph 17 of the petition. In my view, there is inordinate delay in filing the petition and no sufficient or plausible reason has been given for the said delay, hence on the ground of delay and latches alone, this petition is liable to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed. (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J) Rma wp5098-09.sxw