S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.44/05 Date:25/07/2008 HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE ASHOK PARIHAR Mr. Shashank Sharma, for appellant. Mr. Sailesh Prakash Sharma, for respondents. BY THE COURT: After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I have carefully gone through the material on record. The dispute is in regard to license fee charged from the persons allotted telephone booth on the Railway Station platform. It has been submitted on behalf of the defendant-respondents that in the particular area for handicapped persons, the plaintiff-appellant was also allotted a space on the Railway platform free of cost. However, there was not any condition that the license fee could not be charged from the said persons. Learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellant could not show any rule, regulation or circular exempting such handicapped persons from depositing the license fee. It was only some percentage or part of charges recovered by the plaintiff from the passengers using facility of telephone booth. Since after due consideration proper discretion has already been used by the lower appellate court, in the facts and circumstances, no further interference is called for by this court, moreso, when no substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed accordingly as having no merits. (Ashok Parihar) J.