IOT Writ Petition (S'i No. 2571 of2BW 1) Arjun Toppo, S/o. Shri 8asu Toppo, aged sbout 28 vsars. Const3b!s No. 294. oostsd at Bheji Thana, District Dan{e<vada, South Bastar (CG). 2) Yashwant Kuraiti, S/o. S'nri Bj.tdhman, aged aboyt 30 years, Constabie No.647, R'o. Dantewada (CG). 3) Madhukar Ratre, S/o. Shri Aged about years, Constable No. 273, R/o. Dantewada (CG). 4) Dagraj Dhruv, S/o. Shri Shivoharan, aged about 27 years, Constabte No:275, R/o. Dantewada (CG). 5) Jagdev Raj, S./o. Shri Arjun Masih Raj, aged about 27 years, Constable No.346, K/0. Usnt3lWaOS ('-/^)- 6) Suneshwer Mahilange, S/o. Jugatram, aged about 33 years, Constable No.84, R/o. Dantewada (CG). 7) Santaj Tarma, S/o. Ramaram, aged about 29 years, .Constable No.62, R/o. Dsntswsds (CG). 8) Narendra Dhruv, S/o. Saheb Singh, aged about 27 years, Constable No.308, R/o. i'~\.-*^4-.*.t—^.^//^<^^ ust st.iswdiu'rf \s-/u; ^- Vefsus 1) State of Chhattisgarh, throu.gh Secretary, Department of Home, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2} Inspector Generai of Police, Baster Range, Jagdalpur (CG). 3) Superintendent of Poiice, Dantewada, South Baster (CG). 4) Shri Pramoa Kumar Khes, the Then Sub Inspector, through t'ne Superintendent'of Police, Daritewada, South Baster (CG). (VVrit Petition under Articte 226 ofthe Constitution of India.) SB: Hon'Sife Mr. Satish K. Aanihotri, J. Sh.ri K.K. Singh, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Atok Baksh', Govt. Advpcate for the State :SII (Passed on S'" day of May, ) With consent of learned counsei appearing for both the parties, the matter is heard finally. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, at this stage, submits thai the petitioners do not want to contest this matSer on merii, except that the representation dated nii (Annexure P/2) pending before the respondents authority be decided expeditiousiy, in aocordanoe with law. 3) Learned counsel appearing for the /State submit that there is no reason asto why t'ne representation, if pending may not be decided within a reasonabie time, in accoraance witn law. 45 In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents authority to consider and decicie the aforesaid representation, in accordanoe with taw on itsown mem, expeaitiously. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri ~1 Judge -^ ^aiu ^s.