IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC(T) No.: 324 of 2008. Decided on: 22.10.2010. __________________________________________________________ Bhagat Ram. … Petitioner. Versus B.M. Nanta and others. …Respondents/Contemnors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Surender Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents/ Contemnors : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): It has come in the reply filed by respondent No.1 that the retiral benefits have already been released to the petitioner. In view of this, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 22, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?