mCH COURT OF JL1DICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILASPIHR Single Beneh: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W.P.No. 1596 OP 2003 PetitionCT Respfmdente M.S. Bhaina, S/o Shri Sone Sai, aged 48 years, Oceupation-Service, R/o Village & Post Ramanujnagar, District Sarguja (CG) Versus 1. Umon oflhdia, Ttuou^i Seeretary, Departmeat ofPepsonneI & Training, New Delhi. 2. Director, Department of Persoimel & Traininfe Govenunent oflndia, New DeUii. 3. State of Chhattisgarh flirough Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 4. State ofMadhya Pradesh Throu^i Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Rural Development, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal. 5. Secretary, State Reorganization CeB, rtepartment if General Administration, Govenuneat of Madfaya Pradesh, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal. 6. Development Commissioner, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) 7. Development Commissioner, Panchayat & Rwal Development Department, Govenunent of Ctihattisgarh, Raipur (CG) 8. ChiefExecutiveOf&cer, JanpadPanchayat, Ramanujnagar. Shri Indrasen Sahu, leamed counsel for the petitioner. Smt. B.K. Maity, leamed counsel for Union of.Iadia/respondents No. .1 & 2 Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for State/respondents No. 3 & 7. Shri S.S. Rajput, leamed counsel for respondents No 4, 5 & 6. Noae for respondent No. S. ORALORDER (3rt February, 2006) This petition is filed under Article 226 and 227 ofthe Constitution oflhdia impugning Ifae order dated 9.10.2002 (Annexure P-2) passed by respondent No. 3 lii Priya whereby the petitioner has been allocated to the State ofMadhya Pradesh as Asstt. Development Extension QfiGcer in the Panchayat and Rural Development 2. At Ihis stege, leamed counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petition may be disposed ofwith liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before tfae concemed authority and the concemed authority may be directed to consider and decide the representation expeditiously to which Ae leamed counsel for the respondents have no otgection. 3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed ofwitfa direction to the respondents to consider and decide (he representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks fi-om the date ofrepresentation made by the petitioner, if any. No order as to costs. '°e^, Satish K. Agnihotri Judge