IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19007 of 2000 Between: 1 Chintala Nageswara Rao, S/o Venkata Ratnam, Staff No.77577, R/o V.T.Agraharam, Viziangaram. 2 G.Rama Krishna, S/o Paradesi, Staff No.77572, Zonal Work Shop, R/o V.T.Agraharam, Viziangaram. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Secretary, A.P.S.R.T.C., Staff Retirement Benefits Scheme, RTC X Roads, Hyderabad. 2 The Works Manger, Zonal Work Shop, A.P.S.R.T.C., Vizianagram. 3 The Deputy CAD, Zonal Work Shop, A.P.S.R.T.C., Vizianagram. 4 The Personal Officer, Zonal Work Shop, A.P.S.R.T.C., Vizianagram. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Corporation in revising the loan installments of the petitioners from Rs.704/- and Rs.728/- to Rs.2,135/- and Rs.2,205/- respectively without any notice and contrary to the terms of the original sanctioned loan is arbitrary, illegal, null and void and abuse of power and to issue a consequential direction directing the respondents Corporation to deduct an amount of Rs.704/- and Rs.728/- from the petitioners’ salary as per the original loan agreement and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deem ﬁt and proper in the facts and circumstance of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI Counsel for the Respondents: MR.C.APPAIAH SARMA The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.19007 of 2000 ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel on either side that the subject matter of this writ petition is covered to be disposed of in view of the judgment of this Court, dated 14.10.2003, rendered in W.P.No.12919 of 2000. In view of the same, following the aforesaid judgment, the impugned action of the respondents in revising the loan installments of the petitioners from Rs.704/- and Rs.728/- to Rs.2,135/- and Rs.2,205/- respectively is declared illegal and the respondents are directed to recover the loan amount, if not already recovered, at the rate of Rs.704/- and Rs.728/-, from the salaries of the petitioners respectively. The writ petition is allowed to the extent indicated above. No order as to costs. ________________________ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY 28th August, 2008 IBL