[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL W.P.NO.1254 OF 2007 Mrs.Kirpal Kaur Oberoi and Anr. ..Petitioners Vs. M/s.Sudhir Steel Traders and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.Ghanshyam Upadhyay Advocate for Petitioners Ms.A.T.Jhaveri A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : FEBRUARY 18, 2008 DATE : FEBRUARY 18, 2008 DATE : FEBRUARY 18, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners are seeking quashing of proceedings relating to Criminal Case No.1807/S/2005 which is pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 20th Court at Mazgaon, Mumbai. In the said case, the process has been issued against the petitioners under Sections 138 read with Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act. In my view, if the process issued against the [-2-] petitioners is set aside, the proceedings in respect of the petitioners, would come to an end. 3. For the reasons recorded in the order passed by this Court in the case of V.K.Jain Vs. P.V.Padode; V.K.Jain Vs. P.V.Padode; V.K.Jain Vs. P.V.Padode; 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, which has been upheld by the Hon’ble Apex Court, I am of the opinion that the petitioners have an efficacious remedy of preferring revision against the order of Magistrate issuing process. Hence, in my view, it would be appropriate that the petitioners prefer a revision before the concerned Sessions Court against the order of the Magistrate issuing process. 4. Liberty is granted to the petitioners to prefer the necessary revision before the concerned Sessions Court. The learned advocate for the petitioners makes a statement that the necessary revision will be preferred within five weeks from today. In view of this statement, the trial Court shall not proceed with the trial for a period of five weeks. Liberty is granted to the Petitioners to raise the grounds in the revision which are raised in this petition as well as any other grounds that they wish to do so. [-3-] 5. On the necessary revision being preferred by the petitioners before the concerned Sessions Court, the concerned Sessions Court shall dispose of the matter on merits after hearing the necessary parties. 6. Writ Petition is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]