bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.145 OF 2006 TAX APPEAL NO.145 OF 2006 TAX APPEAL NO.145 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax, ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Malhar Information Services ..Respondent Mr.D.K.Kamwal for the Appellant. Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, V.C.DAGA, V.C.DAGA, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 19TH NOVEMBER, 2008 : 19TH NOVEMBER, 2008 : 19TH NOVEMBER, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The learned Counsel for both the parties categorically state that the questions of law involved in the above Appeal are squarely covered by a common judgment of our Court in the case of Income Tax Appeal (L) No.194 Income Tax Appeal (L) No.194 Income Tax Appeal (L) No.194 of of of 2005 and other connected Appeals decided on dated 2005 and other connected Appeals decided on dated 2005 and other connected Appeals decided on dated 20th 20th 20th June,2006 June,2006 June,2006, in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue. The learned Counsel for the Respondent also states, that out of those Appeals, the Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1154 of 2005 was filed against the very same Assessee. In view thereof, for the same reasons mentioned in the aforesaid order dated 20th June,2006, the present Appeal also stands dismissed. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)