w^ p IN THE HIGH GOURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR W.P.No.'z-^7of2002 KAUSHAL KISHORE MISHRA SON 01 LATE SANT SARAN MISHRA A(;ED 46 YEARS, CHIEF EDITOR/PUBLISHER, DAINIK I A ItUN CHHATTISGARH, PANDRI, RAIPUR PETITIONER VERSUS !. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH 1 HROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE/REVENUE, DAU .^^•^^ •-" ..•" . .\.--'~ .»./"' KALYAN SINGH BHAWAN, • ^^••^,:^.^ RAIPUR. '<?^'-\ •••••" ^"'-^••"' '^ 2. i HE COLLECTOR, RAIPUR 3. I HE NAZUL OFFICER, RAIPUR RESPONDEN'f.S W IIIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE ;:()NfSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ?RITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI iD/OR ORDER(S), AND/OR DIRECTION(S) IN THE 11 URE OF WRITS Sdf- Acting Chi —t' ;^-^41F^y-v"^=a^^'y^ffw #w*-H£^— Rf^'VX ^•Aa.iE;'-^'' 111 i^ Bl' ss'i' •'iii-;' Ef&'^ IBl KXW HIGHCOURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRITPETITIONN0.2177 OF 2002 Kaushal Kishore Mishra Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others uovi/n (Writ Petition underArticle 226 and 227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on this 18th day of October, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing fof the petitioner submits that with the passage of time the petition has become infructuous, to which learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection. 2, !n view of foregoing, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuQus. ^ "7 Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 161 ^