CR No. 5419 of 2010 -1- ***** IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 5419 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 27.08.2010 Pardeep Kaur .......... Petitioner Versus Narinder Pal ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present : Mr. Arvind Kashyap, Advocate for the petitioner. **** VINOD K. SHARMA, J. (ORAL) This revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 5.5.2010, passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Rupnagar, vide which an application moved by the petitioner under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act stands allowed. In a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, the petitioner / wife moved an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, for grant of maintenance pendente lite. The petitioner claimed a sum of ` 40,000/- ( Rupees forty thousand only) per month as maintenance by claiming, that respondent / husband was earning ` 90,000/- (Rupees ninety thousand only) per month. The application was contested by the respondent / CR No. 5419 of 2010 -2- ***** husband, wherein it was pleaded, that he was getting salary of ` 28,000/- (Rupees twenty eight thousand only) per month. It was also the stand of the respondent / husband, that out of income of ` 28,000/- (Rupees twenty eight thousand only) per month, he is also maintaining his old parents. The petitioner failed to prove any income from the immovable property, as pleaded in the petition. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, and also that the husband / respondent is maintaining old parents a sum of ` 8,000/- (Rupees eight thousand only) per month was granted to the petitioner towards maintenance pendente lite, and ` 3,000/- (Rupees three thousand only) towards litigation expenses. The amount awarded by the learned trial Court can not be said to be on the lower side, which may call for interference by this Court. No merit. Dismissed. 27.08.2010 (VINOD K. SHARMA) 'sp' JUDGE