1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.8473/2009. : : Dr. Alpana Vyas Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : : Date of Order 3.8.2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain for the petitioner. Mr. Dinesh Yadav, AAG for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that controversy raised in this matter is squarely covered by judgment of Coordinate Bench of this Court in a batch of petitions, main judgment being rendered in Ms. Savita Samriya Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : SB Civil Writ Petition No.5238/2009 on 22.5.2009. It is contended that aforesaid petitions were allowed and the termination of petitioner was held to be arbitrary and illegal and the respondents were restrained from appointing substitute College Lecturers for the academic session 2009-2010 against the vacancies for which the petitioners were appointed and directed to reconsider the claim of petitioners on priority basis for the academic session for 2009-2010 and pass appropriate orders. It was however directed that petitioners shall not be entitled 2 to emoluments as fixed amount as referred in the appointment letter for the period of respective colleges for summer vacation and further that they would be entitled to be paid from the date of their joining as per the order of continuation/fresh appointment in the next academic session 2009-2010. Learned counsel submitted that petitioners were engaged during the academic session 2008-2009 and that in terms of aforesaid judgment they are entitled to continue against the vacancies in which they were continued till fresh appointment was not made through RPSC. Learned counsel for the respondents though has opposed the writ petition. He is however not in position to distinguish the present matters from the judgment rendered by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Ms. Savita (supra). The controversy thus is squarely covered by aforesaid judgment. The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of in terms of aforesaid judgment with the direction that all the petitioner shall be continued on the post of Lecturer in terms of the aforesaid judgment passed by this Court and the directions contained in para No.16 of the judgment shall be mutatis-mutandis be applied in the case of petitioners too. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/-