IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28798 of 2008 PAPPU THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.9.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is in custody in relation to Kanti P.S. Case No. 152 of 2000 for the offence under sections 394 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that his name has figured on the basis of a confession of co- accused, namely, Mansoor who was caught from the place of occurrence even he has been enlarged on bail by the High Court. Not only this yet another so called co-accused Sushil Mandal has already been released on bail by the Court. The case of the petitioner being no different, let the petitioner, namely, Pappu Thakur be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri T. Yadav, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 152 of 2000. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)