:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 466 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 466 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 466 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.2234 PETITION NO.2234 PETITION NO.2234 OF 2005 OF 2005 OF 2005 M/s.Swati Minerals .. Appellant V/s Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Ors. .. Respondents ----- CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 468 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 468 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 468 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.2235 PETITION NO.2235 PETITION NO.2235 OF 2005 OF 2005 OF 2005 M/s.Swati Minerals .. Appellant V/s Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Ors. .. Respondents ----- CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 469 APPLICATION NO. 469 APPLICATION NO. 469 OF 2006 OF 2006 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.2236 PETITION NO.2236 PETITION NO.2236 OF 2005 OF 2005 OF 2005 M/s.Swati Minerals .. Appellant V/s Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Ors. .. Respondents ----- CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 470 APPLICATION NO. 470 APPLICATION NO. 470 OF 2006 OF 2006 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.2237 PETITION NO.2237 PETITION NO.2237 OF 2005 OF 2005 OF 2005 M/s.Swati Minerals .. Appellant V/s Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Ors. .. Respondents ----- CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 471 APPLICATION NO. 471 APPLICATION NO. 471 OF 2006 OF 2006 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.2238 PETITION NO.2238 PETITION NO.2238 OF 2005 OF 2005 OF 2005 M/s.Swati Minerals .. Appellant V/s Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Ors. .. Respondents :2: Shri.M.K.Kulkarni for the Appellants. Shri.M.V.Gopalkrishna & Shri.A.S.Rao for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, J.P.DEVADHAR, J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 21ST FEBRUARY, 2006. : 21ST FEBRUARY, 2006. : 21ST FEBRUARY, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellants and the learned Counsel for the Respondents. 2. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. By these Civil Applications, the Applicants are seeking to recall the orders dated 9th August, 2005 whereby the above Writ Petitions came to be dismissed in default. For the reasons stated in the above Civil Applications sufficient causes are made out for recalling the orders dated 9th August, 2005. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bona fide on the part of the Applicants. Hence, the Civil Applications are made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). Place the above Writ Petitions for admission. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)