ffirwii c SiWULt IN THE HIGILCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C| N0. 5^13^ /2010 WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITIUTION OF THE INDIA PETITIONER Sharma S/o. Shri R.K. Sharma, aged about 30 $8.9:^-,^,'3.---" " years, R/o. Village - Sargaon, ^s^^^;^----" Distt- Bilaspur (C-G-' VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) ^. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) 01. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER. ~~^.. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETITION (C) No. 5498 of2010 Sampatti Sharma VERSUS RESPONDENTS Regional Transport Authority & Another WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'bleShri Satish K. Aenihotri, J. Present: Shri Anshul R. Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner Shri M.P. Bhatia, Deputy Government Advocate for the State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 24th day of September, 2010) The petitioner has filed this petitioii seeking a direction to the Regional Transport Authority to consider his application as eariy as possible. There is no prescription in any statutory rule to consider the application within a prescribed time. It depends upon the convening ofthe meeting and, as such, no direction can be issued by this Court, at this stage. However, it is expected that the respondent authorities may look into the grievance of the petitioner and do the needful, as early as possible. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gowri