IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5696 of 2010 1.SANJAY YADAV S/O DAWARIKA YADAV R/O MAULVICHAK, P.S.- CHANDAUTI, DISTT.- GAYA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 10.05.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case instituted under Sections 302 and 120B/34 of the Penal Code. Looking to the F.I.R. it appears that the allegation against the petitioner is specific and direct. As per F.I.R., he took out his weapon and slit the neck of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that he has not made out a case for bail with reference to the post mortem report. It is next contended that there was dispute relating to land on which the deceased was carrying the business of cattle fair. The petitioner was claiming the land and as such he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State, strongly opposed the case, and submitted that as per the materials on record petitioner seems to be the main assailant. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to admit the petitioner to bail. Prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected. However, if there is undue delay in taking up the trial, petitioner may have liberty to renew his prayer for bail Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)