1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.3772/2007 (Jayanti Lal & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : August 21, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Shambhoo Singh, for the petitioners. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor. Mr.D.S.Udawat, for the complainant. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by the counsel appearing for the complainant. Perused the order impugned. Victim Sugna is present in Court and has been identified by her counsel Mr. D.S.Udawat. She has stated that she has married to co-accused Rajendra Kumar and has been living with her in-laws and today, she came to the Court along with elder brother of her husband Rajendra Kumar. She has also stated that since she has married to co-accused Rajendra Kumar and living with her in-laws, now, therefore, there remains no grievance. Be that as it may, so far as petitioners are concerned, the allegation of rape is not against these two petitioners. 2 Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and the petitioners Jayanti Lal s/o Amraji Meena and Dilip s/o Nana Lal be released on bail in FIR No.192/2007, P.S. Bichhiwara provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/