IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 101 of 2004 (M/B) M/s Bajaj Electricals Ltd. M- 163 Greater Kailash New Delhi Through its project in charge (Area Manager) Deepanjan Gupta ...... Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Secretary Urban Development, Dehradun. 2. Mela Officer Hardwar Development Authority Hardwar. 3. M/s Crompton Greaves Ltd. Vandana 11 Tolostoy Marg New Delhi through its Area Manager. ........ Respondents Sri Syed Nadim/Sri G. C. Kandpal, Advocates for the petitioner. Sri N.C.Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2. Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Sri Syed Nadim/Sri G. C. Kandpal, Advocates for the petitioner. Sri N.C.Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2. 2. Sri Syed Nadim, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has now become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 03.05.2006 03.05.2006 A