1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR J U D G M E N T S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1171 of 2010. Tejmal son of Shri Bhairu Lal VERSUS Pawan Electricals and Another Date of Judgment :::: 27th January, 2010. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Mr. Vishwajeet Mantri, Counsel for the Petitioner. *** By the Court : It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that on 23.10.2009 when the plaintiff himself had entered in the witness-box as PW-1 and was being cross- examined, he was unable to depose before the Court after having been cross-examined partially and sought some time. This fact is mentioned in Para 4 of the writ petition. However, specific reason has neither been mentioned in the writ petition nor in the order-sheet of the Court dated 23.10.2009 or in the deposition in cross-examination of PW-1 recorded by the learned trial Court. All that has been recorded is that the witness expressed his inability to continue with the cross- examination and sought time, which was objected to by the other side and the Court recorded that the cross-examination 2 stands completed and his statement was closed. In view of the fact that no specific reasons have come before this Court either from the record of the learned trial Court or in the writ petition filed before this Court, it is not possible for this Court to come to any decision merely on the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is at liberty to move a proper application before the learned trial Court in this behalf, which shall be decided in accordance with the law by the learned trial Court. Subject to the above, this writ petition stands disposed of. (Dalip Singh), J. Ashok/