- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.413/2009 Ramsevakdas Ramdas Sole. ...Petitioner.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents... ..... Shri P.V. Barde, Advocate for petitioner. Shri V.H.Dighe, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3. ..... CORAM: V.C.DAGA & A.V. POTDAR,JJ. DATE: 14.07.2009 PER COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the petition. The prayers sought to be claimed can not be granted in the writ - 2 - jurisdiction since there is no foundation for the said prayers made. No rule permitting the upgradation is disclosed by the petitioner. The petition is devoid of any substance. In the result, it is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (A.V. Potdar,J.) (V.C. Daga, J.) ndk/c1470929