1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi CONTEMPT PETITION NO.2 OF 2004 IN COMPANY APPLICATION NO.633 OF 2000 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 59 OF 1984. Rashtriya Girni Kamgar Sangh. .. Petitioners. vs. Regional Provident Commissioner & Ors. .. Respondents. .... Ms. Riyaz Ritwij, i/b. Ajay Panicker, for Petitioners. Mrs. S.V. Bharucha, for Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 3. .... CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 22ND JULY 2009. P.C. This contempt petition is filed for a declaration that respondent nos.1 to 4 have committed contempt by not complying with the directions passed in orders dated 28 th September 2001 and 19 th November 2003 passed in Company Application No.633 of 2000 and they be sentenced to maximum punishment of imprisonment and fine. 2. Respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 have filed their affidavit dated 31 st March 2009, wherein it is contended that the order could not be complied 2 with since the Official Liquidator had not transferred the necessary papers to the respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3. It is submitted that since the papers are now transferred upon the petitioner’s submitting Form 19 to the Provident Fund Commissioner, respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 shall settle the provident fund dues and pay the petitioners. 3. The learned Advocate for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are desirous of withdrawing the contempt petition. 4. In view of the above explanation given by the Advocate for respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3, the contempt petition stands dismissed with no order as to costs. [ S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ]