IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14505 of 2009 NANDU MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 31.08.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 1372/06 registered under section 498-A IPC including sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner is the husband of the complainant. It is contended that he is still prepared to keep the complainant as his wife. It is further contended that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. This Court perused the impugned order. Looking to the observations/findings recorded by the learned Sessions Judge in concluding paragraph of the impugned order, this Court is not inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail. His prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is, accordingly, rejected. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )