IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31199 of 2009 Pinku Jaiswal, Son of Rajendra Prasad Jaiswal, Resident of Gurudwara Road, Danapur, P.S. Danapur, District Patna. -------- Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ------ Opp. Party ----------- 3 13.10.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. In view of the allegation made under Section 25(1b)A/26 of the Arms Act said to have been substantiated by way of recovery of one country made pistol and cartridge, the petitioner, in normal circumstances could have been held entitled for being granted bail as he has already completed judicial custody for a period of more than six months (in jail since 3.4.2009) in this case but when it is found that the petitioner is also have criminal antecedent and is an accused in at least two cases one under Section 302 and the other under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present till he completes one year of judicial custody. That being so, the petitioner, namely, Pinku Jaiswal shall be released on bail after completion of one year of judicial custody 2 i.e. on or after 2nd April, 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.P. Shukla, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Danapur, Patna in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 96 of 2009. It is, however, made clear that one of the bailers must be a close family member of the petitioner and such bail of the petitioner would stand cancelled if he is again found to be involved in any other criminal case. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)