1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Ninth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15498 of 2011 VELRAJ ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MUTHIAPURAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI, CR NO. 784/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. C.T.PERUMAL Advocate For Respondent : MR. K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is the sole accused in Cr.No.784 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of I.P.C and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act. Apprehending arrest, at the hands of the respondent police, the petitioner is before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of the prosecution, the petitioner abused the de facto complainant and pushed down her and thereby caused simple injury and after treatment, she has been discharged from the hospital. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would deny the above allegations. According to him, due to election motive, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the petitioner is entitled for anticipatory bail. 4.I have considered the above submissions made by both sides. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5.Having regard to the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with the following conditions: 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.II, Thoothukudi, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. 7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 29/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, THOOTHUKUDI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUTHIAPURAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. C.T.PERUMAL Advocate SR.No.41837 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15498 of 2011 Date :29/11/2011 TR : 02.12.2011: 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/