CWP No.6712 of 2010.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.6712 of 2010 Date of decision : 26.05.2010 M/s Pankaj Industries ...Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and another …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL **** Present: Mr. Gaurav Bakshi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashwani Markanday, DAG, Haryana, for the respondents. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) The grievance raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondent No.1-Financial Commissioner, Town and Country Planning, Haryana, to decide the pending revision petition dated 30.6.2008 (Annexure P-2) which has been filed by respondent No.2-Estate Officer, HUDA, challenging the order of the Administrator, HUDA, dated 4.7.2007 whereby the resumed plot of the petitioner bearing No.1620, MIE, Bahadurgarh was restored to it. Notice of motion was issued to the respondents who, despite service did not file any reply to controvert the facts on behalf of 1 CWP No.6712 of 2010.doc respondent No.1 whereas respondent No.2 has chosen not to put in appearance. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.1 to decide the revision petition (Annexure P-2), if not already decided, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order after hearing the affected parties. May 26, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) atulsethi JUDGE 2