- OF TTISGA A BI CHHATTISGARH W.P. (S) No. H? /2011 /V Chhattisgarh Rajasva Nirikshak Sangh registration No. 76, through State President, Regional Office, Chhattisgarh Nagar,‘ Tikrapara, Raipur(C.G.) PETINER TIO a VERSUS (1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Revenue & Disaster Management Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) /(2) Director, Revenue Department, Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA INTHE HIGH COURT CHHARH T LASPUR RESPONDENTS / HIGH COURT GF CHHATTtSGARH : SILASPUR WRW PETmON (S) NO. 4.71 3 OF 29H {Writ Petition urwer Artide 226 of the Constitution of india) Singie Bench 2 Hon’ble Shri Saiish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :— Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajit Sing'n, Pane! Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on this 10" day of October, 201 1) ”(9 ainOk PETH‘EONER Chha‘disaarh Ragasva Nirikshak $angh Versus; RESPQNDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Another t. At the very outset, Shri Singh, teamed counsei appearing for the State/respondents, on inetructions, submits that the tranefer order dated 18.08.2011 (Annexure AH), has not been passed by a competent authority in accordance with Rule 20, Part H, of the Madhya Pradesh/Chnattisgerh Lend Record Manuat, thus, the same is dhsustainabte in taw and shalt not be given effect to. 2. In vtew of the above submission made by learned State counsel, aocordino to teamed counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for adiudication at this stage. 3.’ Accordingly, the transfer order dated 18082011 (Annexure AM) is quashed. However, liberty is reserved to the State/respondents to pass aoetooriate order, if so advised, in accordance with law, in administrative extgency and in pubiic interest. 4. in View of the above, the writ petition is aiiowed. No order asto costs. Sd/- SATISH K. ANGNIHORI Judge