THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Civil Revision Petition Nos.4611 and 4745 of 2010 COMMON ORDER: These two civil revision petitions, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, are directed against the orders dated 21.08.2010 passed in I.A. Nos. 1281 and 1280 of 2010 respectively in O.S. No. 166 of 2007, whereunder the learned VIII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, allowed the applications filed by the respondents herein, defendants in the suit, seeking to receive certain documents on record and recall D.W.1 for the purpose of marking those documents in his evidence. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff and perused the orders under revision and other material available on record. A perusal of the order passed by the Court below in I.A. No. 1280 of 2010 reveals that the intention of the learned Judge was not to dismiss the petition on mere technicalities and instead the matter be adjudicated on merits, by giving opportunity to the defendants to file the documents on which they relied upon. Further, to compensate the loss that is caused to the plaintiff on account of delay in the proceedings due to recalling D.W.1 for the purpose of marking those documents, the learned Judge imposed costs of Rs.300/- and also fixed a date for appearance of D.W.1, so as to avoid further delay. Thus, I am of the considered opinion that no prejudice can be said to have been caused to the plaintiff in view of the impugned orders of the Court below, allowing the petitions filed by the defendants to receive the documents and recall D.W.1 for the purpose of marking them, necessitating interference of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India therewith. There is no merit in the civil revision petitions and they are accordingly dismissed. No costs. __________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 2nd November, 2010 IBL