IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15385 of 2010 Date of Decision : August 27, 2010. Naresh Kumar Gupta and another .....Petitioners versus Union of India and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr,Pardeep Solath, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners allege that the appointment of one J.P.Narain, a retired Additional Registrar of the Cooperative Societies, Haryana, as the sole Arbitrator is contrary to the guidelines and the conditions contained in the Government of India notification dated 24.2.2003 (Annexure P-4). The order dated 15.4.2010 (Annexure P-2) passed by the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Haryana, whereby the above-named Arbitrator was appointed, indicates that the petitioners were duly represented at the time of appointment of the Arbitrator and no such objection was raised by them. Be that as it may, the petitioners are at liberty to seek modification/clarification of the above mentioned order dated 15.4.2010 C.W.P.No .15385 of 2010 2 (Annexure P-2) and if such an application is moved by them, the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Haryana, is directed to consider and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order within a period of two weeks from its receipt. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 27, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE