: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.77 OF 2009 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.289 OF 2009 Siddeshwar Moglappa Kamurthi ... Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.D.D. Madon i/b H.S. Venegaonkar for Petitioner Mr.A.I. Patel, AGP, for Respondent No.1 Mr.R.P. Sabba for Contemnor CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: NOVEMBER 13, 2009 P.C.: 1. The civil application has been filed by the applicant contending that the order passed in the Public Interest Litigation and the consequent undertaking given by the Collector to this Court in the Contempt Petition are not referrable to the applicant’s structure. It is contended that the applicant’s structure could be regularised and, therefore, would not fall within the purview of the order passed in the PIL or the undertaking furnished to this Court by the Collector. 2. A Writ Petition has already been filed by the applicant bearing Writ Petition No.9306 of 2008 which is pending admission in this Court. The State has filed an application to the learned Chief Justice for clubbing the writ petition and the present : 2 : contempt petition. 3. In these circumstances, the Collector will not act on his undertaking furnished to this Court qua Survey No.115 admeasuring 2675 sq.mtrs, Village Dapoda, Tal.: Bhiwandi, Dist.Thane for a period of two weeks or till any order is obtained in the writ petition filed by the petitioner, whichever is earlier. 4. Civil application is disposed of accordingly.