IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 331 OF 2007 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 331 OF 2007 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 331 OF 2007 IN CIVIL APPLN. NO. 4953 OF 1989 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4654 OF 1989 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5218 OF 1988 LAXMAN SOPAN SAYKAR ... PETITIONER VERSUS BASAVRAJ BALAPPA GIRISAGAR ... RESPONDENT Mr.G.M.Savagave, Advocate, for the petitioner. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 6th February,2008. DATE: 6th February,2008. DATE: 6th February,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. The order passed by this Court on 27.10.1989 has been fully complied with and according to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the sale deed has also been executed in favour of the petitioner. However, after that the original respondent No.7 has also entered into an agreement for sale of the same property in favour of some third party. Such action of the original respondent No.7 may give an independent cause of action to the petitioner for which he may seek remedy as may be permissible in law, but certainly it does not make a ground for taking action for contempt of Court. The Petition stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)