H^^^OURT^ QIHAniSSARH^T MLASPUR W.P. (S) No. 1839 of 2007 Petitioners Versus Respondents 1. Smt. Joyantri TTiakur, W/o. Shri Tulsi Ram Thokur, aged obout 40 years, Assistant Teocher, ©ovt. Primory School - Khamhar Tola, Btock - Dondi, Distt. Durg (C.6.) 2. Daulat Rom Dhruw, S/o airi Brij Lol Dhruw, ayd dbout 46 years, Asistont Teflhcer (Superintend), Pre-Matric Tribal Hostel Mcgartood Block - Magorload Distt. - Dhamtari (C.6.) 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through:- The Sea'etary, Depwtment of Tribal Welfare &.KLS. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) 2. Canmissioner Tribul Welfare, Chhattisgarh Gavi. Raipw 3. Assistcnt Commissionef, Tribal welfore, Distt. &urg (C.6.) 4. Assistont Commissioner, Tribal Welfwe^ bistt. C>hcantari (C.e.) SB; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sntish K. Agnihotri. J Present: Mr. A.S. Riyput, Advocate for the petltioners. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panel L<wyer for Stffte/respondents. OR&ER (Passed on this 29ffl Day of March, 2007) 1. The question of law involved herein asto whether the petitioners ore entitled to regular pcy scale w.e.f. the dote of initial oppoin'hnent or from the date of completion of |m>bation period. 2. Learned counsel oppeoring for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved tiie present writ petition we the same to ttiat of in W. P. (S) No. 5976/20)6 (Sudiil Tiwari and others vs. State ©ovemment of Chhattisgwh & others), which was ollowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. 3. In view of the fltoove-statedsitemissions made by learned couisel for the parties, Ihe writ petition is allowed in the some terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Subhash