IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 20TH MARCH 2009 / 29TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 9038 of 2009(Y) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ P.M.NIXON, S/O.MATHEW, PONTHOKKAN VEEDU, CHENGALUR, P.O.PUDUKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.BHARATHAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. VILLAGE OFFICER, CHENGALUR VILLAGE, CHENGALUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUDUKKAD. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUDUKKAD. 4. TAHSILDAR, MUKUNDAPURAM. 5. MARTIN, MECHARIPPADAM HOUSE, P.O.PUDUKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 6. NITHYANANDAN, POYKKADATH HOUSE, P.O.CHENGALUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 7. JAYAN, ARANAKKA HOUSE, P.O.CHENGALUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 9038 OF 2009 (y) ===================== Dated this the 20th day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T In this writ petition the complaint of the petitioner is regarding the alleged unauthorised quarrying by respondents 5 to 7. Though the petitioner is seeking direction to respondents 2 and 3 to take action on Exts.P3 and P4, I feel that in the nature of the allegations, it is only appropriate that the petitioner moves the Geologist concerned, since only with his permit quarrying can be done. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing that if the petitioner has any complaint regarding the unauthorised quarrying by respondents 5 to 7, it will be open to the petitioner to move the Geologist, in which case, the needful shall be done by the Geologist with notice to the affected parties. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp