(y c^- IN THE HON»BLEmGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT ^^^a^- - MISC. APPEAL N0. 3 S OF 2009 <^{ APPELLANTS DEFENDANT N0. 1 DEFENDANT N0. 2 1. Pawan Kumar Agrawal, S/o Late Raisaheb Banwarilal Agrawal, Sarkanda, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) i.^^;^' ^^ n^-a- ..^^" :.^%%- ^..^s^y RESPONDENTS PLAINTIFF N0. 1 PLAINTIFF N0. 2 PLAINTIFF N0. 3 PLAINTIFF N0. 4 DEFENDNAT N0. 3 DEFENDNAT N0. 4 2. Krishna Kumar Agrawal, S/o &hri Pawan Kumar Agrawal, prop. Krishna Vihar Colojny, S/o Smt. Late Bela Devi Agrawal, W/o Shri Pawan Kumar Agrawal, R/o Naya Sarkanda, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Prabandhak, Shaskiya Pashu Prajanan Prakshetra, Shashkiya Dairy Farm, Sarkanta, Tehsil & Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Officer-In-charge, Joint Directorate of Veterinary Services, Government Poultry Farm, Bilaspur, Tehsil 8& Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Secretaiy, Agriculture, (Animal Husbandry), State of Chhattisgarh, Mantrayalay Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Avinash Mehta, S/o Late Chunnilal Mehta (Adopted Son), Sarkanda, Bilaspur (C.G.) Shri M.K. Gupta, Ex. Tehsildar (O.I.C.) 1988-89) through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, C.G. Government, Mantralaya Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 7. DEFENDNAT N0. 5 Dr. M.1. Shrivastava, P.C.S.R. O/o Joint Director, Veterinary 8ervrices, Bilaspur (C.G.) s^ MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULE (l«rlOF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 1908 XI-HG—78 3?i^T'3FI f^W ^^TT ^TT^T^Hnfo^ ^' Sa T Hi*Rrir ^Nra» '3~5ET ^i^i^i^, ^tii-M^Ko, fsxni'yy _,..^:.A:.:.....^/0.3........... ^ ^-20^— ^TT^T TRF^ (^qf^^f) I^TW^fi^^T^T 1U S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. 09.11.2009 Shri NL Soni, Advocate fo Shri GD Waswani, Govt <^i^f<n41i 'RFTOf ^ f^^t Tf^T??R ^stfiw^n^T Aaarwal appellant. Advocate with Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel Lawyer for State. Learned counsel appearir|g for the appeilant subm'rts that this appeal may be disposed of|with a direction to the trial court todecide the suit within a stipulsjted time. Prayer is reasonable an^l not opposed by the counsel appearing for State. Accordingly, the appeal i^ disposed of with a direction to the trial court to decide the suilj, in accordance with law, on jts own merits, as early as possible months from the date of receipt i asto costs. Consequently, all pending preferable within a period of six ^f a copy of this order. No order applications stand disposed of. Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge