IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8220 OF 2004 P.S.Thenge Petitioner versus MIDC and others Respondents Harindor Toor i/by S.G.Bone, adv. for petitioner P.P.Chavan i/by Little & Co; adv. for MIDC. CORAM : A.P.SHAH AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE : 5th November 2004 PC : 1. Heard advocates. 2. Having regard to the averments made in paras 6(f), 6(g) and 6(h) of the affidavit in reply, this is not a fit case to exercise power under Article 226. Petition is, therefore, dismissed with a direction to respondents to release subsistence allowance to the petitioner forthwith. 3. Ms.Chavan for State states that cheque for subsistence allowance is ready and petitioner can collect the same at any time from the office of Roha. 4. Ms.Chavan also makes a statement that petitioner’s request for changing the head quarter from Roha to some other place will be considered sympathetically and appropriate directions will be passed within two weeks from today. (A.P.SHAH, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)