IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.899 of 2009 RANA VIJAY PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 20.4.2009 Heard learned counsel foe the parties. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 24.10.2008 passed by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran, Motihari in Sessions Trial No. 6 of 2008 by virtue of which the court below refused to discharge the petitioner who is an accused under sections 304(B)/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that it is a case of false implication of this petitioner who is the youngest member of the family. There are number of evidence on record to show that the victim died of natural death and there is inconsistency in the F.I.R. and the narration made in this regard. The Court is of the opinion that inconsistency in evidence and FIR which has been brought on record and its veracity can be tested during the course of the trial and it is no good ground for interference with the order not discharging the petitioner from trial. This application is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)