IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. KRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2009 / 2ND MAGHA 1930 RP.No. 20 of 2009(B) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN MACA.66/2008 Dated 22/10/2008 OPMA.1020/2001 of SPL.COURT FOR EC ACT CASES &MACT,TSR .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/ APPELLANT : ------------------------------------------- T.M. DEVASSY, S/O. MATHEW, THEKKAN HOUSE, KANJIRAPILLY, PERIYARAM, CHALAKUDY, TRICHUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAMESH BABU RESPONDENT(S)/ RESPONDENTS : ----------------------------------------- 1. BHAVANI, W/O. SUBRAN, PULIKUNNATH HOUSE, KANJIRAPPILLY, PERIYARAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. LISSIYAMMA, W/O. DEVASSY, THEKKAN HOUSE, KANJIRAPPILLY, PERIYARAM, CHALAKUDY, TRICHUR DISTRICT. 3. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., REP. BY DIVISIONAL MANAGER, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, TRICHUR. BY ADV. SRI. A.R. GEORGE, ADV. DILIP J. AKKARA, P. RAVINDRANATH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P. 20 OF 2009 IN M.A.C.A. NO. 66 OF 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2009. O R D E R This R.P. is filed to review the judgment dated 22.10.08. I had carefully perused the review petition as well as the judgment passed by me. I have considered the materials necessary for disposal of the appeal and had even reduced the compensation. I had referred to the documents produced which has been specifically noted by the Tribunal. I do not find any error apparent on the face of the record which calls for any review of the judgment. Therefore the R.P. is dismissed. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-