(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5593 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5593 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5593 OF 2004 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5594 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5594 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5594 OF 2004 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5595 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5595 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5595 OF 2004 Baroda Rayon Corporation Ltd. & Ors ...Applicants Versus Pal Credit & Capital Ltd. & Anr ...Respondents ..... Mr. S.L. Maneshinde, Advocate for Applicants Mr. A.S. Khandeparkar i/b Khandeparkar & Associates, for Respondent No.1. Mr. B.H. Mehta, A.P.P. for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 19TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED: 19TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED: 19TH OCTOBER, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant, the learned advocate for respondent No.1 i.e. original complainant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants have prayed for quashing of proceedings relating to Criminal Case Nos. 2155/S/2002, 2156/S/2002 and 329/S/2002 which are pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 7th Court, Dadar, Mumbai. (-2-) 3. The learned advocate for respondent No.1 i.e. original complainant states that the matters have been amicably settled between the parties. The parties have filed the consent terms which are taken on record and marked as "X" for identification. The undertaking therein are accepted. 4. Applications are disposed of in terms of the consent terms. *****