IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 25TH AUGUST 2011 / 3RD BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23132 of 2011(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- P.A.AUGUSTINE,PARACKAL HOUSE, PAZHANGANAD,KIZHAKKAMBALAM,ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.SHAJI P.CHALY SRI.S.GOPAKUMAR SRI.R.SANJITH RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,KALAMASSERY,KOCHI-22,REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR. 2. THE UNIVERSITY ENGINEER,COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, KALAMASSERY,KOCHI-22. ADV. SRI.K.S.MOHAMMED HASHIM,SC,CUSAT,COCHIN FOR R THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 23132 of 2011(N) APPENDIX --------------- PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ----------------------------------- P1: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DT.21.4.10 P2: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT DT.10.6.10 P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER DT.7.7.10 P4: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT DT.21.8.10 P5: TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER DT.16.9.10 P6: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 7.9.10 RESPPONDENT'S EXHIBITS :NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------- W.P(C) No. 23132 of 2011 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 25th day of August, 2011. JUDGMENT According to the petitioner he was awarded in the work of construction of Electrical Mechanic Lab for School of Engineering in the Thrikkakara Campus of the first respondent. It is stated that after executing the agreement he completed the assigned work to the satisfaction of the first respondent. 2. His complaint is that inspite of having completed the work and the lapse of more than 17 months, even now the security deposit for the aforesaid work has not been returned. Petitioner made repeated representations, the last of which is Exhibit P6 dated 7.9.2010 requesting the 2nd respondent to release payment. Even on the representation, there was no response and hence, this writ petition is filed. 3. I heard the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent. Now that according to the petitioner the representations filed by him seeking disbursement of the amount due are pending, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider and pass W.P(C) No. 23132 of 2011 2 orders on Exhibit P6. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within one month on production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of as above. SD/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE rkc //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE