THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRIMINAL PETITION No.11884 OF 2010 DATED:30-11-2010 ORDER: Petitioners-A1 and A3 to A6 are present. Sri D.Kodanda Rami Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri K.Ravindra Babu, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent, are present. 2. Both parties stated that the matrimonial dispute has been settled amicably out side the Court and they have entered into a compromise and a copy of the memorandum of understanding is also placed on record. 2nd respondent stated that as part of the compromise, she has received Rs.2,30,000/- by way o demand drafts in full and final settlement of her claims and that in view of the compromise, she is no longer interested in prosecuting the petitioners-A1 and A3 to A6 in C.C.No.343 of 2004 on the file o the learned XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. 3. Having regard to the fact that the dispute has been settled out side the Court and both parties have entered into memorandum of understanding and the 2nd respondent-complainant is no more interested in prosecuting criminal proceedings against the petitioners herein, it is considered that no useful purpose would be served by continuing further proceedings in C.C.No.343 of 2004 on the file o the learned XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. It is therefore considered a fit case to invoke the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash further proceedings against the petitioners-A1 and A3 to A6 in C.C.No.343 of 2004 on the file o the learned XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. 4. In the circumstances, further proceedings in C.C.No.343 of 2004 on the file o the learned XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad against the petitioners-A1 and A3 to A6 are held liable to be quashed and are accordingly quashed. 5. In the result, Criminal Petition is disposed of. _______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 30th November, 2010 Tsy