IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 35677 of 2009 Date of decision: 10.05.2010 Sunita ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Amit Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Pardeep Virk, DAG, Haryana for the respondent - State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) The allegation, in the present case, is that the present petitioner impersonated herself as real owner of the land in question, i.e. Santosh and transferred the same by putting her thumb impressions as Santosh for the purpose of getting the sale deed registered. The allegations are serious. Mr. Pardeep Virk, DAG, Haryana, on instructions from ASI Surat Singh contends that although the petitioner has joined the investigation but she is not co-operating with the investigation. It is also contended that the petitioner has since refused to give her thumb impressions. In view of the above, the concession of anticipatory bail cannot be extended to the petitioner. Dismissed. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 10.05.2010 mohan