BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twelfth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.10024 of 2011 1 G.MANIKANDAN 2 M.MURUGAN 3 N.MURUGAN 4 PAMBUPANDI 5 NEETHIRAJAN 6 MANIKANDAN 7 CHINNA SADAYANDI 8 RAMAMOORTHY 9 MADHAVAN 10 MUNIASAMY 11 KATTURAJA 12 MUTHURAMALINGAM 13 KANAKKAN 14 NALLUSAMY 15 MARTHANDAN 16 ALAGARSAMY ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 3 TO 18 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE THEPPAKULAM POLICE STATION, CR.NO.925 OF 2008, MADURAI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.P.SAMUEL RAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos.3 to 18 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147,148,323,324 and 506(ii) I.P.C. in Crime No.925 2008 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocence and they were charged under Sections 147,148,323,324 and 506(ii) I.P.C. in Crime No.925 2008. He further submits that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and hence, they prayed for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) would submit that the occurrence took place on 18.09.20008 when the bye- election was being held for the Madurai East Constituency and at that time the de-facto complainant and his party workers were indulged in the election work and at that time the accused 1 and 2 and 50 others https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ were attacked the de-facto complainant and his party workers with aruval and pelted stones and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that though the petitioners were not arrested, they neither interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai, and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. Sd/- 12/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I MADURAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTATE MADURAI 3 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE THEPPAKULAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. S.P.SAMUEL RAJ Advocate SR.No.27570 ssk/16.08.2011 /6c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10024 of 2011 Date :12/08/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/