IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH MAY 2009 / 6TH JYAISHTA 1931 RP.No. 416 of 2009() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.9313/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): -----------------------------. M.MADHUSOODANAN, 'KAVERI', KUDOVATTOOR, VELIYAM VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF MINING AND CEOLOGY, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GOELOGY, TRIVANDRUM. 3. THE GOELOGIST, KOLLAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ R.P.No. 416 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C) NO. 9313 OF 2009 ===================== Dated this the 27th day of May, 2009 O R D E R The main point that is urged is that the purpose of Ext.P5 was for renewal of NOC for obtaining quarrying lease and not quarrying permit as mentioned in the judgment. A reading of Ext.P5 shows that the submission made by the petitioner is correct. Therefore, the review petition is disposed of modifying the first sentence in the judgment and substituting the word 'permit' with the word 'lease'. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp