1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Application No. 1126/2009 in M.C.A. (Rest.) St.No. 15873/2009 in W.P. No. 3814/1998 (decided) Sau. Aparna Arun Rajdekar.vs.State of Maharashtra thr. Secretary & Ors Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Ms. U. A. Patil, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. O. D. Kakde, A.G.P. for non applicant nos.1 & 2. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND R. K. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 19th JANUARY, 2010. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned A.G.P. for non applicant nos.1 and 2. None appears for non applicant no.3. 2. None of the parties have filed their reply to the applications. In view of that, averments made in the applications stand uncontroverted. 3. After going through the averments made in the applications, we are satisfied that sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay and also for restoration of the matter. Hence, the application for condonation of delay as well as application for restoration of the Writ Petition are allowed. Writ Petition No. 3814/1998 is restored. C. A. No. 1126/2009 and M.C.A. (Rest.)St.No. 15373/2009 stand disposed of accordingly. Judge Judge kahale