THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA WRIT PETITION NO.23999 OF 2010 ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard Sri Mummaneni Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Services II, learned Government Pleader for GAD and Sri M.Ratna Reddy, learned counsel for the respondents. At their request, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for disposal when the application for vacating stay came up for hearing. The petitioner herein is an unsuccessful applicant before the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad {“the Tribunal” for brevity}. He sought to assail the impugned orders of transfer to Adilabad District dated 21.06.2010 opposing the earlier proceedings dated 05.06.2010. The main ground raised by the petitioner is to the effect it virtually amounts to lessening the post at the instance of some recommendations and therefore, the same would be mala fide. The Tribunal did not find favour with the petitioner’s contention and dismissed the same stating that the orders have been passed only on administrative ground and there is no mala fide. Hence, the Writ Petition. On a consideration of the submissions made and on perusal of the material available on record, it is seen that the orders impugned are only in the nature of administrative, i.e., transfer in regard to which the scope of interference either by the Tribunal or by this Court would be minimal. Indulgence need not be given in view of the findings already given by the Tribunal after perusal of the respective pleadings and inspection of the record as well and hence, the same could not be predicted in these proceedings. However, we have once again heard the matter. Except mentioning in regard to exercise of transfer within a short time, no other valid ground has been made out by the petitioner, which amply discloses that the transfer is that of administrative execution and no whisper of any mala fide is attributed on any of the authorities concerned. Hence, we do not find any merits in the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) ________________ (B.N.RAO NALLA, J) 13th April 2011 RRB