IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11.4.2011 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition Nos.6639 and 6640 of 2011 M/S.MADRAS METAL COMPONENT PVT. LTD REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR 160/E 25TH CROSS STREET BESANT NAGAR CHENNAI-90. [ PETITIONER IN BOTH THE WRIT PETITIONS ] Vs 1 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT) THIRUVANMIYUR ASSESSMENT CIRCLE CHENNAI-90. [ RESPONDENT IN BOTH THE WRIT PETITIONS] W.P.No.6639 of 2011: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in TNGST 0923792/2003-2004 and quash the impugned order dated 30.9.2010 and further direct the respondent to pass a fresh assessment order after granting reasonable opportunity to the petitioner in accordance with law. W.P.No.6640 of 2011: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in CST 771570/2003-2004 and quash the impugned order dt.30.9.2010 and further direct the respondent to pass a fresh assessment order after granting reasonable opportunity to the petitioner in accordance with law. For petitioner : Mr.P.Rajkumar For respondents : Mr.R.Mahadevan AGP (T) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ C O M M O N O R D E R At this stage of the hearing of the writ petitions, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the impugned orders of the respondent, dated 30.9.2010, are set aside and the respondent is directed to pass assessment orders, afresh, on considering the objections, as well as the records, to be submitted by the petitioner, to the respondent, as certain discrepancies, are found in the impugned orders, with regard to the reported turn over, submitted by the petitioner and the adopted turn over, considered by the respondent. 2. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent has no objection for this Court passing such an order. 3. Hence, the impugned orders of the respondent, dated 30.9.2010, are set aside and the petitioner is permitted to file all the relevant documents and to raise the necessary objections before the respondent, within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On submission of such objections and on the production of the relevant documents, by the petitioner, the respondent shall consider the same, on merits and in accordance with law, and pass appropriate orders thereon, after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, within a period of eight weeks, thereafter. The writ petitions are ordered accordingly. No costs. Connected M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2011 are closed. Sd/- Asst.Registrar. /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar. lan To: 1 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT) THIRUVANMIYUR ASSESSMENT CIRCLE CHENNAI-90. 1 cc to the Spl. Government Pleader, Taxes Sr.26577 1 cc to Mr.P. Rajkumar, Advocate, Sr. 26033 Writ Petition Nos.6639 and 6640 of 2011 NG (CO) kk 18/4 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/