IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5346 OF 2010 (Shri Keshao M. Thakre & Ors. vs. The Assistant Charity Commissioner & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. NOVEMBER 16, 2010. Heard Shri Masodkar, learned counsel for the petitioners. The contention of the petitioners is, in the garb of implementing the Scheme duly sanctioned under Section 50 of Bombay Public Trust Act, as possession is being disturbed, they have sought stay of that Scheme in appeal proceedings. The appellate Court has in the impugned order found that the protection of possession is altogether different thing and Scheme need not be stayed for that purpose. It has also found that such order allowing temporary injunction in favour of the petitioners was in force and MCA No. 190 of 2005 filed against it was rejected by the then District Judge – 3 on 18.01.2007. The review application against it was dismissed on 04.03.2008. I do not find any jurisdictional error or perversity. The prayer for staying the Scheme itself is misconceived. Writ Petition is, therefore, rejected. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.