IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA FRIDAY, THE 13TH JUNE 2008 / 23RD JYAISHTA 1930 Bail Appl..No. 3763 of 2008() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.259/07 OF KUNNAMKULAM POLICE STATION PETITIONER/3RD ACCUSED --------------------------------------- SURENDREAN.C.A, AGED 50, CHANDDANAPRAMBIL HOUSE, THALAKKOTTUKARA, KACHERY.P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAMACHANDRAN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNNAMKULAM POLICE STATION, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DT. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI.K.S.SIVAKUMAR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.HEMA, J. ----------------------------------------- B.A.No. 3763 of 2008 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of June, 2008 O R D E R This petition is for anticipatory bail. 2. A crime is registered against the petitioner and others on the allegation that a false birth certificate has been created by the accused in furtherance of a common intention by forging signature of the Secretary of the Grama Panchayat. Petitioner is the third accused in the crime. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent of the allegations made. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor pointed out that the third accused has created the documents with the help of fourth accused, who is a staff of the Grama Panchayat. Fourth accused is not arrested. Hence, if third accused is granted anticipatory bail, it may not be possible to trace out fourth accused. Investigation is at the initial stage. Considering the allegations made and the nature of offence involved, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail. This petition is dismissed. K.HEMA, JUDGE vgs.