IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. No. 3765 of 2009. Decided on: 05.07.2010. Ram Dutt Sharma. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Romesh Verma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- “(i) That a writ in the nature mandamus may kindly be issued directing the respondents to revise the entire service and pensionary benefits of petitioner by taking into account the past service rendered by him in Panchayat Samiti towards service under the Panchayati Raj Department, with all consequential service benefits. (ii) That any other relief deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted to the petitioner.” 2. According to the petitioner, Annexure P-6, judgment passed by this Court on 31.7.2008 in CWP No. 1802/2002 has attained finality. In case the petitioner is similarly situated person and his case is covered by the judgment, as contained in 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. Annexure P-6, he cannot be discriminated. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to look into the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law without discriminating the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date of production of the copy of this judgment alongwith copy of the writ petition. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 05, 2010. (bhupender)