•.^' -<\ ^^_^^3^1^_ INTHE M.P. STATE ADMINISTRATIVETfilfijJNAL AT RAIPUR ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. Q^ of 1998 -Applicant : Devendra Kumar Sonkar Aged about 37 years Son of Shri Atmaram Sonkar Resident ofVillage Ghuthera Post - Mungeli, Block &Tah.- Mungeli Distt. Bilaspur (M.P.) (Ex-Mansevi Sahayak Shikchhak, Previously appointed on due selection and eligibilities against the vacant post of Asstt. Teachers, under the Edn. Deptt. of Govt. of M.P.) VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS/ RESPONDENTS (1) StateofM.P. Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal fM.P.) (2) Commissioner of Public Instructions, Govt. of M.R, Education Deptt., Directorate of Public Instructions, (DPI Office), Near Chetak Bridge, Bhopal (M.P.) (3) Deputy Director of Public Instructions Govt. of M.R, Education Deptt. Education Distt. Bilaspur, P.0. Bilaspur fM.R) (4) Block Education Officer Govt. of M.R, Education Deptt. P,0,_Munaeli. Tah.Mungeli, Distt. Bilaspur (M.P.) ,4fi!;lication undersection 19oftheAdministrativeTribunalAct 1985 (No.13of 19851 readwith Articles 14, 16. 21 & 311 of the ConstLtutiQn of India. considered with Priroiptes of Natural and Social Justice. lii A,,i!:ulilL!ll.dl HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTM. J. WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.2536 OF 2005 Petitioner Devendra Kumar Sonkar Respondents versus State ofM.P. and others Present : Mr, Alok Nigam, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the :e. QRDER rfli (Passed on 7m ofSeptember, 2006) It is submitted that the facts and question of law involved in the present petition are same to that of in Ram Sahay Jha vs. State ofMacBrya Pradesh and others (Original Application No. 15/1995). The Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, by its judgment and order dated 16-2-1996, allowed the application of the petitioner therein. Leamed counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to approach the respondents/State for consideration and disposal of the petitioner's case in terms ofthe order dated 16-2-1996 passed in the case of Ram Sahay Jha (Supra) by Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe respondents/State fairly agrees with the submissions made by leamed counsel for the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation before the respondents - State Authorities for their decision on the representation in the light ofthe order dated 16-2- 1996 passed in the case ofRam Sahay Jha (Supra), in accordance with law, on its own merit, within reasonable time. 4. With the above-stated liberty, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Certified copy as per mles. Sdf- ^^' iboW '^:ysi