smuu: btuwcH l G§Y6;a7” EN THE EON’BLE’ HEGH COURT OF éHHATTISGARH AT 69 BILASPUR w.P. s. No. ggg} OF 2010 1. Smt. Anju Dadsena wife 0f Shri Ram 'umar DadS€na, aged about—42 yearS? Govt. Ayurved Compounder, resident m” Labour Colony, Ward No.15, behind Pyarelal School, Tulsipur, Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.). Rajendra Das Sahu S/o Shri Mehtrubl Sahu, aged about—36 years, Govt. Ayurved Compounder, Govt. Ayurved Dispensary Tumdibod E3E’HTIONERS , Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnandg‘aon (C.G.). Sugreev Das Verma S/o Shri Jeevrakhao Das Verma, aged about—41 years, Govt, Ayurved COmpounder, Govt. Ayurved Dispensary, Najar'Atariya, Tah. Khairagarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.). Smt. Chitralekha Sahu wife of $hri Y.K. Sahu, aged about—42 years, Govt. Ayurvw‘i Compounder, VGovt. Ayurved Dispensary, Bundeli, Tah. Chhuikhadan, Disi‘i, Rajnandgaon (C.G.). phiraji Ram Sinha S/o Shri Jaganuram Sahu, aged about—'34 years, Govt. Ayurved Compounder, Govt. Ayurved Dispensary?- Sambalpur, ' Tah. Dongargaon? Eiisu Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Kailash Ram Sinha S/ o Shri Kheduram ' Sinha,-aged ab’but—43 years, GOVL Ayurved Compounder, Govt. Avurved Dispensary, Chircharikala, Tah. Chhu riya, Bi sm‘ . Rajnandgaon (C.G.) .- K /7.” Komdas Sahu S/o Shrl Bishesharda” Sahu aged about 34 yearS Govt Ayurved L Compounderk Govt. Ayurved Dlspensary, / Pandadah,~ Tah. -. K , Distt.k a Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ‘Z8. Lllaram Sahu S/o Sh am Sahu, .: I ' I ' ‘ aged ‘,ab0ut 37 years ov AyurVed Compounde‘rf R/o Main Road Tulsipur, "Wa‘rd N-o.16,’_ in ftoht of Jaiswal Kirana; Distt; Rajrl-andgaon (C.G.) ‘ Dujendra Kumar Dewangan S/o Shri‘ Sheshlal Dewangall, aged about—‘36, yeaIS, Govt. Ayurved Compounder, Govt. Ayurved ‘Dispensary‘ Belargondi, Tah. Chhuriya; Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.). ./Harish_ Jais’walgS/o Shri Liladhar Prasad Jaiswal, ‘ aged about—35 'years, Govt. yorved Compoundef a Govt Ayurved- Dlspensary Ghongha Tah Chhulkhadan, » ~ Dlstt RaJnandgaon (C G ) g I L Smt Suman KatJhare D/o Shrl Shanka1 ,' aged about 34 years Govt Ayurved j 1 CompOiinder,' Govt. Ayurved Dlspensaryk! ', Gaindato1a Tah. Chhu'riyé;_ Dem ._ RaJnandgaon (C G ) L ' V Alakhram Smha S/o Shrl Chhabllal Smha aged about~3o years Govt Ayurved Compounder Govt Ayurved Dlspensaryr Rampur Chlchola Tah Chhurlya Dmtt Rajnandgaon (C G ) Gajadhar Slnha S/o Shm Mansaram Smha a aged about’46 years, Govt Ayurvcd Com'pounder, Govt; Ayurved D1spenSa1‘y , ‘Bgraaa‘b, Tah., Dohg'argarh, \ Distt.‘ - Rajna‘ndgaon (C.G.). ‘ h " ’garh rl ; 1tr Gt t irector, Aayurv’xed, Yog' Awa‘r‘n Prakriti __hikitsa, Yunan ddh Awam Homeopathi, (Aayu'sh), Raipur (C,G. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, ajnandgaon, D‘S’tt. Rajhandgaon (C.G. Zila AayurVed Officer, Rajnandgaon,,Distt. ajnan \ WRIT PETITION ‘" UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TH ONSTITUTION OF ’INDI D k C l, i ) R ) Rdgabn (C.G.). E C A 3a W, WW, . Wy P C$) W N'srzg G, 7 200 mm m was (Wu) WWW wmm mmm (e WWW Wml %$i1%mm&¥r SB EON’BLE MR JUSTICE PRI‘MNKER DEWAKER 29.99201!) Shri Ma1ioj Kumar smha, cc unsel for the petitionérs. Smt. Smita Ghai, Pl. for the, State. Grievance of thé pstitioner presently thay are working as Ayu for regu1arizafjon but their Claim has not been considered by the C‘CT‘. Government. Counsel for the petitioners submits that in the State of Marlhya Pradesh, caSe of simiKarly placed persons have been considered pursuant to the order dated 207.2010 passed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court in W.P.83‘32A £2010 and other identical matters. He further submits that ends c Detitioners are oermitted to with make represantation in terms af or State counsel has no objeetl reoresentation and the same is be after due scrutiny of the facts Chhattisgarh. Accordingly, the petitioner petition with Eberty as aforesaid. such representation, the same WC law after considering all the factu expeditiously as possible. lt is made clear that this C on merits of the ease and the autl‘ to decide the reoresentation “i aoc s in the oresent netition am that rved Compounder and are entitlsd f mstioe would be served if the draw this petition with liberty to :Ier Annexure Pj 1’2. on if the petitioners make any such mg decided in accordance with law and the policy of the State of s are nemiiitteti to Withdraw this In the eventuality of making any uld be decided in accordance with a1 and legal aspects of the case, as )urt has not expressed any opinion LoritV concerned would be at Eibe V ordance with law. y