rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4455 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4455 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4455 OF 2007 IN IN IN APPEAL (L) NO. 365 OF 2007 APPEAL (L) NO. 365 OF 2007 APPEAL (L) NO. 365 OF 2007 IN IN IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 361 OF 2006 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 361 OF 2006 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 361 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1989 OF 2006 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1989 OF 2006 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1989 OF 2006 M/s.TVC Skyshop Ltd. .. Appellants. V/s. M/s. Reliance Communication & Infrastructure Ltd. .. Respondents. Mr.J.P.Sen i/b. Mohanty & Associates for Appellants. None for Respondents. . CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 11th DECEMBER, 2007. DATE : 11th DECEMBER, 2007. DATE : 11th DECEMBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- . Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellants. None appeared for the Respondents though served. The learned Counsel for the Appellants undertakes to file an affidavit of service within a period of one week from today. Perused the Notice of Motion and affidavit in support thereof. By this Notice of Motion, the : 2 : Appellant is seeking condonation of 131 days delay in filing the above Appeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condoning 131 days delay in filing the above Appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)