IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 137 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Sukram Pal S/o Sh. Daulat Joggi 2. Om Pal S/o Sh. Pirthi Gujjar, Both R/o Village : Gangnoli, P.S. : Laksar, Distt. : Haridwar ……. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Senior Superintendent of Police, District Haridwar. 2. Station House Officer, P.S. Laksar, District Haridwar. 3. Smt. Som Kali W/o Kurdi R/o Dabaki Kalan P.S. Laksar, District Haridwar ……. Respondents ……… None for the petitioners. Sri D.K. Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents no. 1 and 2. Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) None for the petitioners. Sri D.K. Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents no. 1 and 2. 2. Sri Sharma, learned Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2 submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of the First Information Report (Annexure 1) has now become infructuous as the police after the investigation has filed charge-sheet against the petitioner. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 02.05.2006 02.05.2006 A