IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4016 of 2008 DAYANAND PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 30.4.2010 Heard Shri Rajeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri M. Dayal, learned APP for the State. After having heard the parties, I do not find any reason to interfere with the order impugned. The petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner shall be heard under section 251 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and if the court finds that the complicity of the petitioner was not indicated by the facts collected in the case diary or that no offence appeared committed by him, then the petitioner shall have the relief of being discharged from the proceedings. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)