IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 25TH JANUARY 2011 / 5TH MAGHA 1932 RP.No. 63 of 2011() --------------------------- THE JUDGMENT DATED 19/02/2010 IN WP(C)NO.20605/2003 ------------------------------ REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS 1-3 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE D.I.G.OR POLICE (ADMN.), POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ANTONY MUKKATH RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 4&5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. J.SURESH KUMAR, RESERVE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE (NOW ON DEPUTATION AS SECURITY OFFICER, GOVERNMENT PRESS, MANNANTHALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695006. 2. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695004. 3. M.RAJAN, RESERVE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE (NOW PROMOTED AS RESERVE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARMED RESERVE RURAL POLICE CAMP, PULINKUDI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695521. R1 BY ADV.MR.KALEESWARAM RAJ. R2 BY ADV.MR.ALEXANDER THOMAS, SC FOR PSC R3 BY ADV.MR.ELVIN PETER.P.J THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P. No.63 of 2011 in W.P.(C)No.20605 of 2003 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 25th day of January, 2011 O R D E R The State has filed this review petition seeking review of my judgment dated 19.02.2010 in W.P.(C)No.20605 of 2003. After hearing the learned Government Pleader, I am of opinion that actually what the State wants is to re-hear the writ petition itself. As such I do not find any grounds to review my judgment. In any event the aggrieved party has already filed writ appeal against the judgment which is pending before the Division Bench. In the above circumstances, if the State is also aggrieved it is for them to take up the matter in writ appeal. Accordingly the review petition is dismissed. Sd/- S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE //True copy// P.A. TO JUDGE shg/