IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 8TH MARCH 2007 / 17TH PHALGUNA 1928 OP.No. 14168 of 2002(J) ------------------------------ PETITIONERS: ------------------- 1. C.V. JACOB, RESIDING AT CHOVALLOOR HOUSE MALAMPUZHA P.O., PALAKKAD. 2. K.C. RAJAKRISHNAN, RESIDING AT KURUPATH HOUSE, KALLEPULLY P.O., PALAKKAD. 3. S. VASANTHAKUMARI, RESIDING AT VINU NIVAS, MALAMPUZHA P.O., PALAKKAD. 4. PREMA NAGAPPAN, RESIDING AT ROHINI, MALAMPUZHA P.O., PALAKKAD. 5. N. RAVEENDRAN, RESIDING AT VALLIKKODE HOUSE, ANAKKAL P.O., MALAMPUZHA, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI.SHAMIER MARICKAR SMT.M.R.VALSA RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE MALAMPUZHA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MALAMPUZHA P.O., PALAKKAD. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, PALAKKAD TALUK. 4. THE PRINCIPAL, JAWAHAR NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA, MALAMPUZHA P.O., PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEWS J.NEDUMPARA, SC, NAVODAYA THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: O.P.14168/2002 ORDER ON C.M.P.NO.23868/2002 IN O.P.NO.14168/2002 DISMISSED 8.3.2007 SD/- C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE I N D E X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE ROUGH SKETCH SHOWING THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE LANDS. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT DT.30.7.91. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE INTIMATION ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT DT.20.1.1993. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J --------------------------------------------- O.P.No.14168 of 2002 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of March, 2007 JUDGMENT Petitioners are residing near the Navodaya School. Prayer in the O.P. is for direction to the respondents to permit petitioners to use the road passing through the school compound. It is seen that the District Collector permitted this arrangement until a ring road is constructed around the school campus. Of course, petitioners should be permitted to walk through the school road cutting through the school compound until alternate road is available. Counsel for the petitioner also stated that no ring road is constructed till now either by the fourth respondent or by the first respondent Panchayath. In the circumstances, O.P. is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to construct and maintain a ring road fit for use by the public, so that they do not use the school road causing inconvenience to the functioning of the school. The O.P. is disposed of as above. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE csl