IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.434 OF 2005 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.958 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO.3882 OF 2003 Harshad Shantilal Gandhi .. Appellant. V/s. Rajendra Shantilal Gandhi & Another .. Respondents. Ms.J. Sidhwa i/b. Zaidy & Co. for the appellant. Mr.P.R. Gyani for respondent No.1. CORAM : R.M. LODHA & CORAM : R.M. LODHA & CORAM : R.M. LODHA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 15TH JUNE, 2005. DATED : 15TH JUNE, 2005. DATED : 15TH JUNE, 2005. P.C. : The learned counsel for first respondent stated before us that the respondent was not intending to dispose of or alienate the subject property. He submits that the statement is made without prejudice to the rights and contentions in the suit. 2. We accept his statement and in view thereof, we are satisfied that no further order needs to be passed in the appeal. 3. The appeal stands disposed of accordingly. (R.M. LODHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)