1 ABA 111-2011 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.111 OF 2011 Nitin Ramchandra Shinde ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.Rahul S. Kate, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.S.D.Shinde, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 1ST MARCH, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is an application for anticipatory bail by a person, who apprehends arrest in connection with C.R.No.50 of 2011 for the offence punishable under Sections 365, 506, 323, 354, 511 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Satara City Police Station, who had presumably at the instance of victim's father tried to 2 ABA 111-2011 take her forcibly in her father's car because she had married against the wishes of her father. Today, the first informant, her husband, her father and applicant Nitin are present. 3. Considering nature of allegations made, applicant's being in custody for the purpose of investigation may not be necessary. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant undertakes not to venture near the victim and her husband till the trial is over and so does the first informant's father. 4. In view of this, in the event of arrest, applicant be released on bail on his furnishing P.R.Bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.25,000/- on the following conditions. (i) The applicant shall report at the Satara City Police Station for interrogation every day from 7th March, 2011 till 25th March, 2011 between 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. 3 ABA 111-2011 and thereafter, once a week between 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on every Sunday till the trial is over. (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. 5. Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of. . The order will remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge sheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court dated 2 nd December, 2010 delivered in Special Leave Petition (Cri.) No.7615 of 2009 (Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State of Maharashtra And Ors.). (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)