*1* CRR-257-11.sxw Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COURT RECEIVER’S REPORT NO.257 OF 2011 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.394 OF 2011 L & T Finance Ltd., Mumbai ... Petitioners V/s. Chandran P. Vayakara & Anr. ... Respondents Ms. Disha Karambar for the Petitioners. Mr. K.K. Trivedi, 1st Asstt. to C.R., is present. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 14 th December, 2011. P.C. : 1. It is stated in the Court Receiver’s Report itself that the Respondents have not approached the Court Receiver for being appointed as an agent and also not allowed him to take formal possession of the vehicle. It is in such circumstances and when the conduct of the Respondents has been highlighted in this report, that I have to direct that the Court Receiver should take forcible possession of the hypotheticated vehicle, and particularly described in prayer clause (b) of the Court Receiver’s Report, with the help of the local Police Station. 2. The Court Receiver’s Report is, therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). The local Police Station shall render all assistance to the Court Receiver in taking forcible possession of the vehicle. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.)