IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11191/2008 Decided on:21.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Mahatam Dei. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. B.C. Negi, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner claims that he has completed ten years’ continuous service and has completed 160 days in a block of 12 calendar months. However, it is evident from the mandays’ chart that the petitioner has not worked continuously for ten years and has also not completed 160 days in a block of 12 calendar months upto the year 2000. He has rendered 160 days in a block of 12 calendar months only from 2001 onwards. 2. Mr. B.C. Negi submits that thereafter his client is continuously working and has completed 160 days in each 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 calendar year and since the petitioner has worked in a tribal area, only 160 days are required to be completed in a block of 12 calendar months. If that is so, the case of the petitioner shall be considered for regularization immediately after completion of ten years of service. 2. In view of above observations, the present petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 21.12.2010 *awasthi*