IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2010 / 1ST ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 9236 of 2006(Y) -------------------------------------- CC.551/2004 of ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, THALASSERY .................... PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- V.P. MOHAMMED, AGED 35 YEARS, SHANAZ MANZIL, C.P.ROAD, MENAPURAM DESAM, CHOKLI.P.O, THALASSERY. BY ADV. SRI.K.SIVAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA. 2. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KANNUR. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THALASSERY. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PANOOR POLICE STATION, PANOOR, KANNUR DISTRICT. 5. K.K. MOHAMMED, C.P.ROAD, P.O.PANNIYANNOOR, PANOOR, KANNUR DISTRICT. 6. K.K. SHABEER, S/O.ABOOTTI, ZAINAS (H), M.S.ROAD, THALASSERRY. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.M.K. PUSHPALATHA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/09/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. WP(C) NO. 9236/2006-Y APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE FIR DATED 15/10/2004 OF CHOKLI POLICE STATION. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE FIR DATED 10/10/2004 OF PANOOR POLICE STATION. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE C.M.P. NO.380/2006. EXT.P7: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 02/02/2006. EXT.P8: COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 06/03/2006. EXT.P9: COPY OF THE VAKALATH. EXT.P10: COPY OF THE PETITION NO.687/2006. EXT.P11: COPY OF THE RAZI. EXT.P12: COPY OF THE PETITION NO.709/2006. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs. M.Sasidharan Nambiar, J. -------------------------- W.P.(C)No.9236 of 2006 Y -------------------------- JUDGMENT This petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India for a direction to Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thalassery to send C.C. No.551/2004 to the Adalath to enable the parties to settle the disputes. Though writ petition was admitted and petitioner was directed to take notice to the respondents, including party respondents 5 and 6, no steps are taken since then. Today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Petition is dismissed. 23rd September, 2010 (M.Sasidharan Nambiar, Judge) tkv