^ C6- (<e^7 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRITPETITION fSI N0. t2>35^ OF 2009 PETITIONER ^ ,./<v? K.P. Manikpuri, Son of Shri J. /•'' Manikpuri, aged 58 years 3 month, »1 ^^^^> (^ ...^^•-""" ./•^T^-10^ ^•" ^<^lj.-"' >^'^': 1^" RESPONDENTS Tahsildar, Up Tahsil Naya Baradwar, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). VERSUS <" 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through; the Secretary, Department of Revenue and Contingency Management, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Collector, Durg, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). 3. Shri Anupam Tiwari, Tahsildar, > Tahsil Bhaisma, District Korba (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRmN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI AND FOR ISSUANCE OF ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRITS. DIRECTIONS OR ORDERS 1^-_BARTICULARS OFTHE PETITIQNER 'S^ -lll-41d-4, aflly'is, f°«niyi< .€:..L^).......^z^ •^iSjf^pf^T t?R?if ^f 1:^^ <Fi(^.i< ^TstSpTSII^T SB ; HO?I'BL Shri Jai Ps-akash Shi| Shri Yashwaat Sic.gy No. l & 2. kla, counse'l for the petitioner. T'hQL^Tj^T- PS-ET- A ^- -ca-c't. i-.i.-L , J->' y • ^ ^.t i^]. for'Q- -J& / Th^act-t -^i-I.^.S-l-. .' -3^0: Challenge ia the prij 30.6.2009 (Aiinexure P/l) which fhe petitioaer has b^eu Champa to District Korba. :sent petition is to t&e order dated passed by fhe respoadeat No.l by ti'aasferred froia District Jaajgir- Contention of coun^ present place of posting h( and he has been shifted ji He furth.er contends tliat •< one vear ai'id iiiae m.onttis| have been shifted froin his that he m.ay be permitted i| Ubei-ta' to file i^presentat| representa.tion is decided, fi~oin his present place ofp^ Learaed couB.sel for petitioaer makes a n ttie coiupetent authority. |el for the petitioner i^ tbat iii his i has hardly conipleted eight siontlis u|st to accoixsiaodate res-oondent No.3. (he peutioner is due to retire wit.hm. and ttierefore also. he oug'ht aot to present place of postiug. He submits jo wifh.draw ttie present peution with .tjon to the respondent aad tffl tae fhe petitioner aiav not be reUeved fistiug, if aot au-eadv reueved. the State has no ob-iectioil if the 3. aad the saine is decided bv epres^ntation Accordingly, the petifion is disizussed as ivithdrawn n-ith •t-'i-ie^ <S-?/Ti-»-wa<~i/S 4 <^ 14U.O-t~f-<» T-o_ Q.TTta-rTt-n/T-I-i+T:?' />-f" ^_f'32^a_ -'a^t+a^l/^-n^yi :r 'a»a%'KS^ K XI-B&—78 'ysf •^wiv\<i,yal'M'Kc, f^wi'yy ..^..M-..£:...c.'5:x:^>i3sci..!. 1 %ITC;IW luaking such representation receipt of this order, fh.e a.uthorities wifh.iu a period receipt. In. the iiieaiiwhile, it operation of tiie im.pugned d P/ 1) shall rem.am. staved tU] petitioiier wffl toe ailowed to| place ofpostiag. 01. °hIAiI^('i<111 'E^Rff^ tt^ ^sifiiqsn^i wifam ten davs froni the date of saiae would be decided by the >f ttiree weeks froni the date of its is directed tliat the effect and irder dated 30.6.2009 (Alinexi.ire - tiie next date of heai-mg aiid the perfona his duty in fh.e presertt Wifh fhe above observ^.'tioa; the petitioa stailds disposed SdA F Pritinker Diwaker Judge