IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 25TH OCTOBER 2011 / 3RD KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 28324 of 2011(M) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. ARJUN.P., PUTHUSSERY HOUSE, KAKKAD.P.O., PUTHUPPADY, THAMARASSERY. 2. FIROZ KHAN.P.R., AL-MANAR HOUSE, KUTHIYATHODU.P.O., KODAMTHURUTH, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.MEDONA LOPEZ RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. PIN-673 635. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. PIN-673 635. R1 & R2 BY ADV.SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW,SC, THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/10/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.28324/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1- TRUE COPY OF THE EXAMINATION RESULTS OF IST PETITIONER DOWNLOADED FROM THE INTERNET SITE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT. EXHIBIT P2- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE IST PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P3- TRUE COPY OF THE ADMISSION LETTER ISSUED BY INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, GUWAHATI. EXHIBIT P4- TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF RS.265/- REMITTED BY THE IST PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P5- TRUE COPY OF THE EXAMINATION RESULTS OF 2ND PETITIONER DOWNLOADED FROM THE INTERNET SITE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT. EXHIBIT P6- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P7- TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF RS.265/- REMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 28324 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 6th Semester examination was declared, they had failed in one paper. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge