ssp 1 LPA 11 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.11 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5475 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7 OF 2011 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.11 OF 2011 M/s.Runwal Construction .....Appellant versus S.M.Puthran & Ors. ..... Respondents Ms.M.R.Patankar with Mr.V.P.Sawant, for the appellant. Mr.Mahesh Londhe i/by M/s.Sanjay Udeshi & Co., for respondent No.1. Mr.T.R.Yadav i/by Mr.S.S.Pathak, for respondent No.2. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATE: 28 th JUNE, 2011 P.C. : 1. The parties have submitted consent terms, which are taken on record. It is pointed out that in full and final settlement of the dispute, respondent has furnished a demand draft of `10,00,000/- to the appellant. It is also pointed out that in the past, an amount of `2,00,000/- was also withdrawn by the respondents from the Registry of Industrial Court, Mumbai. The consent terms duly signed by the parties are taken on record and marked Exh.’X’ for identification. The respective Advocates are present with their respective clients and the learned Advocate ssp 2 LPA 11 of 2011 identified them. Respondent No.1 is also present and has been identified by his Advocate. Parties shall abide by the consent terms and to act accordingly. Letters patent appeal stands disposed of in view of the consent terms. 2. In view of disposal of the appeal, civil application No.7 of 2011 does not survive and the same is disposed of accordingly. ( A.A.SAYED, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )