1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 3526/2009 [ HASANSHAH KADARSHAH AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA] ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. K.S.Malokar, Advocate, for the applicants. Mr. Thakare, APP, for respondent. .......... CORAM : P.D. KODE, J. DATE : DECEMBER 09, 2009. Heard. By the order dated 21st November, 2009, the ad-interim protection in favour of the applicants was granted. The reply filed by the prosecution though reveals that involvement of applicants has been spelt out from the statement of about 6-7 eye witnesses recorded during the investigation, having regard to the fact that the statement of the said witnesses are not recorded immediately, the injured first informant has not named the applicants and even the statement of eye-witnesses prima facie do not speak any specific act committed by the applicants and the learned APP being unable to refute the statement made by the learned counsel for the applicants that they have attended the Investigating Officer, as ordered vide ad-interim direction passed , the same 2 deserves to be confirmed. The ad-interim protection given vide order dated 21st November, 2009 is hereby confirmed untill filing of the charge sheet in the said crime on the same terms & conditions upon which the same was granted. However, liberty to the prosecution to apply in accordance with law for cancellation and/or modification of the protection granted. Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Rvjalit