HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLESHRI N.K. AGARWAL, J. Writ Appeal No. 455 of 2011 Appellant Petitioner Chandrakishore Sahu, aged about 49 years, s/o Shri Dhandhu Ram Sahu, working as Multipurpose Health worker, Community Health Centre, Doundilohara, district Durg C.G. Respondents . VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Health & Family Welfare Department, DKS Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) 2. The Under Secretary, Department of Heaith & Family Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur C.G. 3. Chief Medical & Health Officer, Durg, district Durg C.G. 4. Block Medical Officer, Doundilohara, district Durg C.G. 5. Udit hlardel, Multipurpose Health Worker, Sub-Health Centre Bharveli, Community Health Centre, Bamhanidih, district-Janjgir-Champa, C.G. Writ appeal under Section 2 Sub-section (11 ofthe Chhattisaarh Hiah Courts (Appeal to Division Bench) Act. 2006 Present: Shri Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal, counsel for the appellant. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Additional Advocate General for the State / respondents No.1 to 4. /y3'^ "%, i 1 \ ^^./ •s WA.No. 455 of 2011 JUDGMENT ?th (26lnSeptember,2011) The following judgment of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Learned counsel for the parties are heard on admission. 2) The appellant has filed this intra Court appeal against the impugned order dated 12.09.2011, passed in WP(S) No.5383/2011. 3) The appellanV petitioner stands transferred from Community Health Centre, Doundilohara to Community Health Centre, Saja within the same district of Durg. 4) Learned Single Judge on a thorough consideration of the submissions advanced on behalf of the appellanV petitioner did not find any infirmity in the subsequent order of petitioner's transfer dated 27.08.2011, and therefore, dismissed the appellant's writ petition vide impugned order dated 12.09.2011. 5) Shri Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal, learned counsel for the appellant vehemently argued that the petitioner has been transferred in violation of the transfer pplicy framed by the State Government. 6) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, we do not find any infirmity either in the order of appellant's transfer from Dounditohara to Saja within the district of Durg or in the impugnect order passed by the learned Single Judge declining to interfere in the matter of petitioner's transfer. 7) The writ appeal filed by the appellant, therefore, is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge v^^