IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 24th day of November 2009 Ist Bail Application No.124 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Shajjad @ Sanjay .…. Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No 240 of 2007, U/s 2/3 Gangster Act, PS Nehru Colony, District Haridwar. _______________________________________________________________ November 24, 2009 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Sri Pramod Bailwal, learned Counsel for the accused applicant and Sri M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State. In brief, the prosecution case is that an FIR was lodged on 31.12.2007 by the S.O., PS Nehru Colony, Dehradun against the applicant and three other persons under Section 2/3 of the Gangster Act alleging therein that these persons have made a gang and they are involved in serious offences. Along with the bail application, a gang chart has been annexed as Annexure No. 2, wherein following cases have been shown against the accused applicant: (i) Case crime no. 46/2007, u/s 379 IPC, PS Nehru Colonly. (ii) Case crime no. 50/2007, u/s 379, 411 IPC, PS Nehru Colonly. (iii) Case crime no. 61/2007, u/s 379 IPC, PS Nehru Colonly. (iv) Case crime no. 265/2007, u/s 379, 411 IPC, PS Kotwali. (v) Case crime no. 188/2007, u/s 406 IPC, PS Patel Nagar. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant submitted that applicant has been convicted in all the five aforesaid cases by the court concerned. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; after going through the contents of the FIR and after considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any ground to release the accused appellant on bail at this stage. Bail application of the accused applicant Shajjad @ Sanjay is accordingly rejected. (Dharam Veer, J.) 24.11.2009 PRABODH 2