IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.M-19484 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 31.7.2009. Charanjit Kaur ....Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab. ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. A.K. Walia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, Sr. DAG Punjab. Mr. Sanjay Kaushal, Advocate. RAJESH BINDAL J. **** On 21.7.2009, the following orders were passed: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the only allegation against the petitioner in the FIR is that she raised a lalkara. All the injuries on the person of the complainant party were found to be simple in nature. In fact in cross fight even on the petitioner's side suffered injuries. Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has already joined investigation. Recovery has been made and her custodial interrogation is not required. On the other hand learned counsel for the complainant objected to the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner claiming that she is the main accused being leader of the gang who attacked the complainant party in their own fields. He further submitted that serious injuries have been suffered on the side of the complainant including fracture of the right forearm. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the allegations against the petitioner in the FIR is only regarding raising lalkara. As the petitioner has already joined investigation, I do not find that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required. -2- Accordingly, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 21.7.2009 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) 31.7.2009 JUDGE Reema