IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.9 OF 2008 APPEAL NO.9 OF 2008 APPEAL NO.9 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.1151 OF 2004 M/s.Haldyn Glass Ltd. .. Appellant V/s Mr.Ishwar D.Bangere .. Respondents Mr.V.P.Vaidya for the Appellant. Mr.R.D.Bhat for Respondents. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 25th March, 2008. DATE : 25th March, 2008. DATE : 25th March, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Appeal, the Appellant is challenging an order of the learned Single Judge dated 1.8.2006 whereby the learned Single Judge has concurred with the view taken by the Labour Court. We do not find any error or illegality in the order of the learned Single Judge. As recorded in Paragraph No.3 of the impugned order, a statement was made on behalf of the Appellant that the balance amount will be paid within a period of twelve weeks from the date of that order. That statement was accepted by the Court. There is absolutely no merit in the Appeal. Hence Appeal stands dismissed with costs. 2. In view of dismissal of the Appeal nothing further survives in the Notice of Motion No.138/2008. Hence, the said Notice of Motion also stands dismissed. (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)