IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRR No. 2824 of 2009 Date of decision: 11.01.2010 Satpal Singh Bittu Katta ........ petitioner Versus Kishan Chand .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Surinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ajay Singla, Advocate for the respondent -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already undergone the entire sentence. In view of the same, the present petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge January 11, 2010 mohan