IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2009 / 28TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 16846 of 2009(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.SUMATHI, VARUVILA VEEDU, THAZHAM SOUTH, CHATHANNOOR, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.SANTHOSH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 2. THE DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, KOLLAM. 3. THE TALUK SURVEYOR, KOLLAM. 4. SUMANAS.J., ANIL BHAVAN, THAZHAM SOUTH, CHIRAKKARA, KOLLAM. 5. R.VIJAYAN, SAJEEV MANDIRAM, PERAYAMCHERRY, THAZHUTHALA, UMAYANALLOOR P.O., KOLLAM. BY GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).16846/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 18th day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT Aggrieved by the proceedings taken in relation to the re-survey of a residential property, petitioner has preferred an appeal before the 2nd respondent. Appeal has been heard as intimated by Ext.P9, but final orders have not been passed. Accordingly, petitioner has approached this Court praying for the following reliefs:- (i). Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or oder, directing the 2nd respondent to finalize the proceedings initiated as per Ext.P9 notice and communicate the decisions thereon to the petitioner at once. (ii). Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order, directing the 2nd respondent to rectify the mistake in the resurvey plan of the petitioner's property with notice to the petitioner and respondents 4 and 5. W.P.(C).16846/2009 2 2. I heard learned Government Pleader also. 2nd respondent shall finalize the proceedings pending before him, as evidenced by Ext.P9, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. If the necessary parties have not been heard, they shall be heard before the proceedings are finalized. Writ petition is disposed of as above. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs