/ o^ / INTHEHIGH COURT QF JUDICATUREAT CHHATT1SGARH_, BILASPUR WRITPETITION (S) N0. J^. 72009 PETITIONER ^; ^^•' .^' r]?v5^? .^%^'""" ^'%?p"1' RESPONDENT Versus Brij Bihari Dubey, S/o Late Shri Medini Prasad Dubey, aged dbout64years,R/6 Akharabhantha, Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) / The Municipal Council through The Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council, Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner named above mosf respectfully begs to prefer ^ HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition fS) No. 641 of 2009 Petitioner Brij Bihari Dubey Versus Respondent The Municipal Couacil, Sakti WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONgTITUTION OF INDIA, (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri S. C. Venna, Advocate ibr the petitiouer. Shri Pushpendra Patel, Advocate for the respondeiit. O RD E R (Orall (Passed on ttus 17tfa day of Septeinber, 2009) Heard. 1. 2. 3. 4. Tbatalr By this petition, fhe petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to disburse the retiral dues i.e. amount of leave encashinent aad provident fund. Learned counsel appearing for fhe i^spondent subiaits that the petitiouer is entitled to total siun to the tune of Rs. 34,256/-. However, haviag regard to fhe financial condition of the respondent, Uberty inay be granted to pay in three inonthly iastallTnents. He further subinits that the petitioner would be entitled to iuterest at the rate of 6% per nnniiin on fhe delayed payment of amount. In view of the above, accordirig to learaed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nofhiug survives ia fhis petidon for adjudication. In view of fhe foregouig, fhe petition staads disposed of. No order asto costs. It is expected fhat the respondent inay pay the retiral dues to the petitioner, as above, ia three inonthly iastaUments, with iuterest @ 6% p.a. However, it m.ay not be treated as precedent. ——— - —~ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri: Judge