$F’2aaz‘ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT FETITION (S) No. Q! I] OF 2009 ($3.) PETITIONERS /‘1. Thibaru Ram Kashyap s/o Late Shri Botiram Kashyap, aged about 4O :— Teacher, Presently posted as L.D.T. at Balak Ashram Chintalnar, Tahsil Konta, District — Dantewada (C.G.) years, Occupation — R/o village 85 Post Dimrapal Tahsil and District Jagdalpur (C.G.). Smt. Naval Kashyap w/o Shri M.R. Kashyap, aged about 33 years, Occupation — Teacher, Presently Posted as L.D.T. at Kanya’ Ashram Bhusaras, Tahsil Dantewada District Dantewada (C.G.) R/o village — Kalepal, Post l Telimarenga, Tahsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). VERSUS RESPGNDENTS /:~ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Commissioner, Tribal Welfare and Development, Raipur (C.G.). Collector, District Collectorate, Dantewada District Dantewada (C. G. ) . The Secretary Mata Rukhmani Sewa Sansthan Samiti Dimrapal Tahs1l 85 Dlstrlct Jagdalpur (C G ) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 1] PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERSz— A n nhvn-m ark“; ’ ‘1 @KQW HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 5411 of2009 PETITIONERS : Thibam Ram Kashyap & another. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA N SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. A nihot ' J. Present: Shri Amiya Kant Tiwan‘, Advocate for the petitioners. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents 1 to 3. _ ORDER ORAL) (Passed on 25‘ day of September, 2009) ‘Heard Ieamed counsel for the palties. 1. Learned counsel appean‘ng for the petitioners submite that the instant petition ’ is squarelii covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Smt. ALaIZ v. State ofChham'Sganh Cir Others], thus the petitioners may be permitted to make - a reyresentation to decide their case in the light ofaforestated decision, subject to verification asto whether the respondent No. 4-Institute is a Government Aided school and the petitioners are teacher within the sanctioned strength. 2. Learned counsei appearing for the State/respondents 1 to 3 submits that in the event, the petitioners make a representation the same Will be constdered and decrded, in accordance With law, Within a period offour weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representation. 3. In View of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the 4. petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingiy, petition the writ is disposed of. % Sd/- if ‘ Am z‘ gatish K. AgniMm \~ , . ' Judge i :1, 2007 (1)BLJ 255