IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31329 of 2010 AJAY RAJAK, SON OF LATE ARJUN RAJAK Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that initially the court below had given liberty to renew the prayer for bail after three months despite which the court below did not grant bail to the petitioner. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 14.12.2009 and has fair antecedents, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dalasing Sarai (Samastipur) in Dalasing Sarai P.S. Case No. 290 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the wife of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the bailor shall 2 also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)