IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1736 of 2009 Ravi Sinha, s/o Late Shyam Chandra Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Kashipur, Ward No. 12, In front of Annapurna Nursing Home, P.O. + P.S.- Samastipur, District Samastipur. ..Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Minakshi Verma, w/o Ravi Sinha, D/o Janardan Prasad Verma, resident of Mohalla- Kashipur, Ward No. 12, P.O. & P.S.- Samastipur, District- Samastipur. … Opp. Parties. ---------------------------------- 2. 01.12.2011 The petitioner has preferred this revision application under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act against the order dated 29.7.2009 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Samastipur in Misc. Case No. 55 of 2009 by which the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.3000/- per month as maintenance to his wife- Minakshi Verma. The main grievance of the petitioner is that he is ready to lead conjugal life with his wife- opposite party no. 2 and is also ready to maintain her but his wife does not want to live with him. Mr. J. K. Singh, learned counsel for the State submits that it appears from the impugned order that after reconciliation the impugned order has been passed and no interference in the impugned order is required 2 by this Court. Admittedly, the petitioner is the husband of opposite party no. 2 and he is also a clerk in Morwa Block, Samastipur. Considering the facts and circumstances, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The petitioner is at liberty to take steps for restitution of conjugal rights in accordance with law. This petition stands disposed of. Kanchan (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)