IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16589 of 2011 SANTOSH KUMAR PATEL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 26.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. Eighty (80) thousand each from nine (9) boys was realized for Passport and VISA to provide them job in Malaysia, but assured work was not allotted to victims. Submission of the learned counsel for petitioner is that petitioner is brother of co-accused Shailesh who is the real person to make arrangements for Malaysia that is done also, but so called victims did not like the work allotted to them there and they all came back. So, fixing any liability, rejection of anticipatory bail cannot be justified. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Manjhagarh P. S. Case No.233 of 2010, subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)