IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22665 of 2011 Bimal Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr ---------------------------------- 2. 20.12.2011 The respondent No.1 State of Bihar is not necessary party. Therefore the name of respondent No.1 is deleted. The petitioner husband has filed this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 16.8.2011 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna in Matrimonial Case No. 524 of 2009 whereby the court below rejected the review application filed by the petitioner for review of the earlier order dated 21.4.2011 whereby the court below had directed the petitioner to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.1000/- to the respondent and Rs.1000/- to the minor children and also directed to pay Rs.3000/- lump sum as litigation cost. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has no means to earn and, therefore, he is unable to pay the said amount. The petitioner has offered to give 8 kattha land to the wife but the learned court below did not consider and rejected the review application. Admittedly, the respondent is the wife of the petitioner. The petitioner has filed divorce case. It is also admitted that the petitioner has got three children who are living with the respondent. From perusal of the impugned order it appears that the learned court below considered the fact and held that the ground raised by the petitioner is not a ground for review of the order passed by the court under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Therefore, there is no jurisdictional error in the impugned order. Thus, this writ application is dismissed. S.S. (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)