IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRL.P.NO.3144 OF 2010. Date:09.04.2010 Between:- J.Narsimha Rao ..Petitioner/A-10 And The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another. .. Respondents ORDER:- The petitioner is the accused No.10 in Crime No.9 of 2010 of Hanwada Police Station, Mahabubnagar District. He is accused of offences punishable under Sections 302, 109 and 34 I.P.C. The offence took place on 21.01.2010. The petitioner is seeking quashing of F.I.R. in this crime. 2. As per allegations in F.I.R. and in the remand report, there are disputes between two groups of persons in the village in connection with landed property. The lands originally belonged to A-10. As per allegations in F.I.R. and the remand report, it was A-1 to A-9, who committed murder of the deceased in this crime. But, as per allegations in F.I.R., the murder was committed by way of pre-plan. As per allegations in the remand report, it was due to the acts of A-10 only, enmity developed between two groups, which resulted in two murders including the present murder. So, A-10 is also impleaded as one of the accused herein. As per the stand of the police, it was due to the activity of A-10, these murders took place. In this connection, the case is still pending. No final report is filed by the police. Simply because name of A-10 is not mentioned in F.I.R or any statement of witnesses about his participation in the murder, it cannot be said that A-10 has no complicity in this case. It is a matter which has to be finally arrived at after collecting entire evidence by the investigating officer during investigation. It is too early a stage to contend that A-10 has absolutely nothing to do with this case. I do not find any merits in this petition. 3. Hence, the petition is dismissed. _​_________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J 9th April 2010 AMD