..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3711 OF 2008 Shri.Santosh Vitthal Tengale. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.K.S.Patil, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP, for the State. Mr.S.S.Salunke, Adv. for orig.complainant. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 24th October, 2008. DATED : 24th October, 2008. DATED : 24th October, 2008. P.C.: . Leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant, the learned Advocate for orig.complainant and the learned APP for the State. 3. The applicant is seeking quashing of Criminal Complaint No.105 of 2008 which is pending before the learned J.M.F.C. Mohol. The said case relates to M.E.C.R. No. No.14 of 2008 at Mohol ..(2).. police station, Solapur Gramin. The said M.E.C.R. arose on account of complaint filed by respondent No.2 against the applicant who is her husband and his relatives and one friend of the husband. 4. The learned Advocate for the orig.complainant has stated that the dispute has been amicably settled between the husband and wife and in view of the amicable settlement the respondent wife does not wish to pursue her complaint. The husband and wife have entered into consent terms which are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. In view of the settlement between the parties, the matter is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. In view of the consent terms, the above Criminal Complaint No.105 of 2008 which is pending before the learned J.M.F.C. Mohol is quashed. The applicant who is in jail be released forthwith if not required in any other case. 5. Criminal Application is disposed of. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)