IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.4070 of 2010. Decided on: 19th July, 2010. Anuradha. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and ors. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed for the following prayers: “(i) That writ of mandamus may kindly be issued and the respondents may be directed to regularize the services of the petitioner as Clerk pursuant to her option (Annexure P-6) from the due date as per notifications dated 20/23.9.2008 and 4.9.2009 (Annexure P-4 & Annexure P-5). (ii) To consider the recommendations of the respondent No.3 dated 23.12.2009 (Annexure P-9) and take a decision on the same in a time bound manner and regularize the services of the petitioner as Clerk, as per option exercised by her.” 2. It is seen from Annexure P-9 that the matter is now pending before the second respondent. There will be a direction to the second respondent/competent authority to take a final decision in the matter, adverting to the 2 submissions made in the relevant documents within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 19th July, 2010 ( Justice Kuldip Singh), (tr) Judge.