IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 06.09.2010 COCP No.1728 of 2010 (O&M) Inderjit Singh Butter ...Petitioner Versus S.S.Brar and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Dr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Rajesh Narang, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) This Court on 26.10.2009 found that the petitioner is entitled to decision in regard to claim made by the petitioner in the representation dated 07.08.2008 in respect of the order of suspension. The petitioner has been ordered to be reinstated vide order dated 02.12.2009. The grievance of the petitioner is that the consequential order of payment of salary has not been passed, therefore, the respondents are in contempt, as such was the claim in the representation. A perusal of the order passed by this Court shows that an FIR against the petitioner in terms of the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is pending. In view of the pendency of a criminal trial against the petitioner under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, the petitioner cannot claim any arrears of salary except the entitlement of suspension allowance in terms of the Rules. In view of the above, I do not find that any case for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents is made out. Dismissed. 06.09.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE