ssp 1 WP 8786 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8786 of 2010 Mahendra Narshibhai Chawda and Ors. .....Petitioners versus The Administrator & Divisional Commissioner and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.Sanjeev Gorwadkar with Ms.Deepti Mistry i/by Vaibhav Mehta & Associates, for the petitioners. Mr.Chirag Balsara with Mr.Sanmish Gola i/by M/s.Markand Gandhi & Co., for respondent No.3. Ms.Aparna Vhatkar, AGP, for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.Jagdish Aradwad, for respondent No.4. Mr.Prashant N. Sutar, for respondent No.6. CORAM: RANJIT MORE, J. DATE: 4th MAY, 2011. P.C. : 1. Mr.Gorwadkar, after taking instructions from his clients, states that petitioners want to challenge Letter of Intent before the competent authority and therefore, he does not press the reliefs claimed in the petition. In view of the said statement, writ petition is disposed of as not pressed. 2. Mr.Gorwadkar submitted that he requires some time to challenge the Letter of Intent before the competent authority, and therefore, protection needs to be granted to the petitioner’s structure for some time. Mr.Balsara, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3, ssp 2 WP 8786 of 2010 after taking instructions from his client, makes a statement that for a period of three weeks from today, status quo will be maintained and the respondent No.3 will not move to the competent authority for eviction/demolition of the petitioner’s structure. The said statement is accepted. 3. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. ( RANJIT MORE, J. )