IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3820 of 2011 RENU DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Admittedly, on the basis of fardbeyan of petitioner, Sakshora P.S. Case No. 18 of 2010 under section-302/34 of the Indian Penal Code was registered in respect of murder of petitioner’s husband against some persons. In course of investigation, the petitioner confessed her guilt before the police disclosing this fact that she alongwith one Niranjan Mishra and others got eliminated her husband. It also came to light that she had illicit relationship with the aforesaid Niranjan Mishra. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the aforesaid Niranjan Mishra is none-else but the son of sister of the petitioner and as a matter of fact, the local Mukhiya hatched up a conspiracy with named accused persons of this case and subsequently, police went in collusion of the above- said persons and roped the petitioner in the alleged crime. It is further contended by him that except the so-called confessional statement of the petitioner, there is nothing against her. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Renu Devi be released on bail on - 2 - furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sakshora P.S. Case No. 18 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)