- 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 286 OF 2010 Raghubansh Ramnarayan Singh .. Applicant Vs. Kalidin Ramcharan Pal ..Respondent Mr. R. D. Mishra, for the Applicant. CORAM : R. C. CHAVAN, J. DATED : JUNE 9, 2010. P.C. : . Both the learned Judge of the Court of Small Causes Court and the first Appellate Court have consistently held that the premises do not fall in slum area. Both the Courts below have held that the plaintiff had proved bona fide need and was entitled to a decree of ejectment. The learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant is in possession of documents to show that the premises are situated in an area, declared as a slum. He however, could not give any reason as to why these documents were not produced either before the trial Court or the first appellate Court. In view of this, there is no question of entertaining these - 2 - documents now in this revision application. It is not shown that the judgments of the Courts below were erroneous or were contrary to the documents or evidence produced either in this Court or the Courts below. In view of this, revision application is rejected. Sd/- [R. C. CHAVAN, J.]