1 Cri.W.P.No.2240/09 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3338 OF 2009 Shivaji Nana Shinde ...Petitioner. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.N.P.Shimpi, adv. for the Petitioner. Smt.V.R.Bhosale, APP for the Respondent No.1. Shri P.D.Dalvi, adv. For the respondent no.2. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : AUGUST 17, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. On a report lodged by the present petitioner, case under Section 302 of the I.P.C. was registered. During the trial of that case, being Sessions Case No.40 of 2007, three different applications were made, one for framing additional charge, another for impleading some more accused and third for recalling the witness. All those applications were rejected. The said order was challenged in the present petition. The learned counsel for the parties informs that pending this petition, trial was concluded and the accused has been acquitted. The State has also filed an application seeking leave to file an appeal and that application is pending before the 2 Cri.W.P.No.2240/09 Division Bench. In view of the conclusion of the trial, the present petition against the impugned orders has become infructuous, therefore, the petition stands disposed off as infructuous. All the points, which were sought to be raised in the present petition may be raised by the State or the petitioner in support of the application seeking leave to prefer an appeal. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)