1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD APPEAL FROM OREDER NO.7/2010 WITH CA NO.557/2010. (SauHabibabegum w/o Saberkhan Vs. Umesh Walekar and Anr.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.SV Gangapurwala, Adv. for Appellants; Mr.AS Bajaj, Adv. for Respondent No.1 ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 4 th February, 2010. ... 1) Heard learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2) The order of clamping of injunction is subject of criticism. 3) The plaintiff apprehended exchange of hands in respect of the property agreed to be purchased, for which, a suit for specific performance was filed. The controversies about other co-owners not to be party to the agreement of sale, need not be dissected at this stage. The fact remains, even care can be taken in terms of Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. The plaintiff is at liberty to get the lis registered with the competent authority. The order under challenge is not disturbed. 4) Appeal from order with CA dismissed. 2 However, the learned Judge seized with the matter shall endeavour to dispose of Special Civil Suit No.328/2009 within a period of a year. 5) No opinion is expressed on merits of the matter. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/AO7.10