IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 5125 of 2010 Decided on: 10.3.2011 Dev Dutt Sharma …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. Rama Kant Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : It is jointly represented by the parties that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP(T) No. 2656 of 2008, decided on 4.3.2009 and the Letters Patent Appeal No. 123 of 2009, preferred against the above said judgment has been dismissed on 11.3.2010. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in view of the principles laid down in the judgment cited hereinabove, within a period of three months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge March 10, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?