IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 27TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 6TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 WP(C).No. 33888 of 2007(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- P.P.ABDU SAMAD, MANAGER, AMMHS & LPS PULIKKAL, P.O.PULIKKAL, MALAPPURAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR SMT.SARITHA DAVID CHUNKATH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MALAPPURAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KONDOTTY, MALAPPURAM DIST. (*ADDITIONAL R4 TO R8 IS IMPLEADED) 4. SMT.BASIMA P.P. U.P.S.A, AMM L.P. & HIGH SCHOOL, PULIKKAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. MR.ABDUL KAREEM.A U.P.S.A, AMM L.P. & HIGH SCHOOL, PULIKKAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 6. SMT.MUMTHAS.O, U.P.S.A, AMM L.P. & HIGH SCHOOL, PULIKKAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 7. MR. MOHAMMED ASHRAF, U.P.S.A, AMM L.P. & HIGH SCHOOL, PULIKKAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. W.P.(C).No.33888/2007 :2: 8. MR.P.P.KUMHALIKUTTY. POTTAMMAL HOUSE, PULIKKAL P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. (* ADDITIONAL R4 TO R8 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 27.11.2007 IN I.A.No.15467/2007) BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN,J ===================== W.P.(C).No.33888 of 2007 =========================== Dated this the 27th day of November, 2007 JUDGMENT Petitioner is the Manager of A M M High School & Lower Primary School, Pulikkal. Disputes are pending in respect of the right to be the Manager of the School. However, the petitioner was approved as the Manager by the District Educational Officer, Malappuram. Appeals and revision petitions are filed against that order but the petitioner is continuing as Manager by virtue of interim order passed in O.P.No.9072/2003. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the DEO, Malappuram has irregularly approved certain appointments made by a person who claimed to be the Manager without considering the directions of this Court and the Educational Authorities. Against the order of the DEO, petitioner filed Ext.P3 revision petition before the first respondent. Petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the same. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be a direction to the first respondent to consider Ext.P3 revision petition, if the W.P.(C).No.33888/2007 2 same has been received and is pending as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and additional respondents 4 to 8. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE dvs