IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** RFA No.52 of 1988 DATE OF DECISION: 05.10.2010 **** Union of India . . . . Appellant Vs. Jarnail Singh and another . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN **** Present: - None for the appellant **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J. (ORAL) On 09.03.2010, this Court had directed learned counsel for the appellant to furnish correct address of the respondents so that notice could be issued to them and the case was adjourned to 08.07.2010. On 08.07.2010, learned counsel for the appellant did not appear, however, again a fortnight time was granted to the learned counsel for the appellant to provide correct address of the respondents for the purpose of their service. As per office report, correct address of the respondents has not yet been supplied by learned counsel for the appellant nor he is present. Dismissed for non-prosecution. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) OCTOBER 05, 2010 JUDGE Vivek