IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33016 of 2011 Amit Kumar Rai @ Kunnu Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 14.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 232 of 2007 in which the cognizance has been taken under Sections 406 and 518 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, petitioner took some cash from complainant for sending the complainant’s son to Dubai but instead of sending him to Dubai, the son of the complainant was sent to Maldiv. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the brother of petitioner had taken money from complainant for preparing the documents of complainant’s son for sending him to abroad and accordingly, the complainant’s son was sent abroad for a job but when he did not get job in the above stated country, the complainant has lodged this false case to put pressure upon the petitioner for return of his money. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, it is ordered that petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case No. 232 of 2007, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- 2 (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Complaint Case No. 232/07(Trial No. 3839/10), subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C. Kamlesh (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)