1 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6854 OF2009 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. S.B. Thorat for the petitioner. Mr. J.G. Reddy for the respondent. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 16TH JUNE 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order firstly because it is only an interim order to remain in force till the disposal of the marriage petition. 2. Secondly, on merits also no fault can be found in the order. Before the Trial Court, the petitioner contended that he was running only 2 one shop by name Prakash Trading Co. at Damodar Nagar and income from the said shop was Rs.1,16,000/- as shown in the income tax returns. The respondent has obtained an information under the Right to Information Act which discloses that the petitioner was also running another shop by name Prakash Mini Market. The certificate of registration of the other shop is annexed to the affidavit in reply filed by the respondent. Income from this shop was never disclosed by the petitioner at the inquiry for fixation of the interim maintenance. 3. Considering the income of the petitioner and also considering that there are two minor children living with the respondent wife, no interference is called for in exercise of writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is accordingly rejected. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)