1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.: 168 OF 2010 *** Avinash S/o Dinkar Thorat Versus The Police Inspector, Sangamner and others *** 1. We have heard learned Senior Counsel Mr. Dixit, instructed by learned counsel Mr. Nagargoje, who appears for the Petitioner and learned A.P.P. Mr. Godbharle for the Respondents. 2. In response to the notice, affidavit in reply has been filed on behalf of Respondent No.1 (page 49). It has been affirmed by Mr. Bhimrao S/o Dagu Gaikwad, Police Sub Inspector, Police Station, Sangamner City, Taluka Sangamner, district Ahmednagar. Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner points out statement made by the affiant in para 11 which reads: "11. ... ... ... Even as on today the Investigation Officer is ready to record the statements of Petitioner as well as the other 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. persons who have seen the incident as per the knowledge of the Petitioner" 3. In view of this statement, in affidavit in reply, counsel for the Petitioner seeks withdrawal of this writ petition. 4. Writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn unconditionally. Petitioner undertakes to remain present before the Investing Officer, and also cause presence of other persons, if any, for recording statement on 13th August, 2010 at 11.00 a.m. [S. S. SHINDE, J.] [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.] Dated:30/07/2010. ans/168