IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 10484 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- HALIMABEN ABDUL SATTAR ADAM THRO' POA MAHAMAD ISSAQ ABU Versus COMPETENT AUTHORITY SAFEMA/ NDPS -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 10484 of 2000 MS NIYATI K SHAH for Petitioner No. 1 (MR KA PUJ) for Petitioner No. 2 MR DN PATEL for Respondent No. 1 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI Date of decision: 11/02/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Heard Ms. Niyati K. Shah, learned advocate for the petitioners and Mr. H.A. Dave for Mr. D.N. Patel, learned advocate for the respondents. 2. Learned advocate for the petitioners has moved a note with a copy to the learned advocate for the respondents, stating that the petitioners want to withdraw this petition, so as to avail alternative remedy available to the petitioner under the law. 3. On the basis of the said note this mater has been placed before this Court today. Ms. Shah has also placed on record the written instructions purported to have been received from the petitioner, informing the advocate for the petitioner that, as the alternative remedy is available, he would like to withdraw the present petition from the High Court. Said written instructions are kept on record. 4. It is stated by Mr. H.A. Dave for Mr. D.N. Patel for the respondents that, there is no objection in permitting the withdrawal as prayed. 5. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim relief granted vide order dated 4-10-2000 to continue for a period of two weeks from today to enable the petitioners to avail alternative remedy, if any. Rule discharged. No costs. Dt: 11-2-2004 ( N.G. Nandi, J ) /vgn