IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CWP No. 22356 of 2010 Date of decision: 19.07.2011 Kesar Singh Chandla and others ........ Petitioners Versus Haryana Vidyut Parsaran Nigam Limited and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. K L Arora, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Mohish Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for the respondents -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned counsel appearing for the respondents states that after calculating the work charge service, the amount so calculated has been paid to the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the same and states that the petition is rendered infructuous and the same be dismissed as such. Ordered accordingly. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 19.07.2011 mohan