!N THE HKSH COURt OF JUD'CATURE Af BfLASPUR CHHATflSGARH W.P. N0. 12-'2-0 /20&6 PFriTtONER : a^i;s &iwm 'iaaa^-"-- "' RESPONDENTS .^^coyl. ^^ gfl*' Smt. Pus'nplata Nishad, Aged about 32 years, W/o. Shri Sa'ndeb Ram Nishad, R/o. Viitase and Post Bhairamgarh, Tah. Bijapur, District Dakshin Bastar, Daritewada (CG) VERSUS 1] State of ChhattiSBarh; Through: Secretary, Tribal 'w'eifare Deptt., D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2] ColieCtor, Dantewada, Distt Dakshfn Bastar, Dantewada (CG) Jj ^. uirector, rancnayat and tiramin vikas Vibhag; Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur (C&) 4] f Chief Executive Officer; Janpad Pancnayat, Bnalramgam, Dfstrict Dantewada (CG) 5] ^ Btock Education Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bhairamgam, District Dantewada (CG) 6] Chief Executjve Officer, Hla Panchayat, Dantewada, District Dantewada (CG) W/RjT ('mTION UNDER ART!CLEJ;26/2270F THE CONSTtTUTION OF INDIA 'WAB^nF-TUE_PETmuMER (S): --»»• ^ HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILA8PUR Sin^e Bench: Hoa'ble Sluri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W. P. No. 1220 OF 2006 Petitioner : Smt Pushplata Nishad Versus Respondents : State of Chliattisgarh & Others. Shri Maaoj Paranjpe, counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Surul Otwani, panel lawyer for fhe respondents. ORAL ORDBR (25th March, 2006) 1. This petition chaltenges fh.e unpugned order dated 30.11.2005, (Annexure P-9), passed by the respondent No.5, whereby the Ofi&cer Inchai^e of Priinary School Chihka, Block Bhairamgarh, District Daatewada, has been directed that the order dated 20.10.2005, (Annexurc P-5), passed by the Janpad Paachayat, Bhairanigarh, appouiting Shiksha Karmi, Grade-III, be not given effect to without permission of District CoUector, Daatewada. 2. Leamed couasel for the petitioner submlts that the petitioaer was duly selected and appointed as Shiksha Kanni Grade-III, vide order dated 20.10.2005 (Annexure P- 5), passed by the respondent N0,6. Thereafter, fhe petitioner subniitted the jnining report on 5.12.2005, (Annexure P-8). Leamed counsel has further subinitted that the petitioner had joined the duties on 5.12.2005, itself. 3. The petitioner was infonned fhat the entire selection process appointmg Shiksha Karnii Grade-III, has been cauceUed. It is further contended that the petitioner has not ^ c^^T^ received any written infonuation as yet about caaceUation ofthe selection proceedings, or his appointinent. 4. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents No. 1, 2 asd 3, submits fhat the petitioner has never joiaed pursuant to his selection aad appointiaent as Shiksha Kanni, Grade-III, as fhe Aiuiexure P-8 is the appUcatton. made by the petitioner to the Chief Executive Of5eer, Janpad paachayat, Bhairamgarh, for his joixiing. It was further subuutted that siace the entire selection proceediags have been quashed aad new selection process has been iaitiated, the petitioner does not have any right to fhe appointinent. 5. Be ttiat as it inay, leamed counsel for the petitioner subuuts that fhe petitioner has inade a representation, (Aruiexure P- 11) to the Secretaiy Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tri.be and Backward Classes, Welfare Departuient, Goveminent of CUiattisgarh, fherefore, fhe respondents inay be directed to decide the said representation wifhia a stipulated period. 6. Haviiig heard learaed counsel for the parties, ia fhe facts and circurastances ofthe case, the respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P-11), ui accordaace with law, wifhin a period ofthree weeks, frovi the date ofreceipt/production ofcopy ofthis order. 7. In view of iforegoiag, this petition staads disposed of. No order as to costs. _ Sd/- , Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1-1'/