IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Bail Application No. 2831/2010 Govind Netwal Vs State of Rajasthan 5.4.2010 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr DS Jadaun - for the petitioner Mr GS Fauzdar, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that FIR has been lodged with delay of four days that too against unknown persons. Petitioner is not involved in the matter still police is trying to arrest him. Hence, anticipatory bail may be granted to him. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After taking into consideration rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, but looking to the facts of this case, I allow this bail application under Section 438 CrPC. Therefore, the SHO/IO of the Police Station Bhinay is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner/s Govind Netwal in FIR No. 19/2010 registered for offence under Section/s 332, 353, 452 and 325 IPC, he shall enlarge him on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i)He shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii)He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii)He shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (iv) He shall not commit same and similar offence during the period of bail. (MN Bhandari), J. bnsharma