ES THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION S-Z-,72006 PETITIONER Ramesh Diwedi, S/o Shri Durga Prasad Diwedi, Aged about 38 years, Post- Pump Operator in the Department ofWater Resource, R/o Chatidiha, Bilaspur, C.G. Kul£i.ISMRH VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary General Administration Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. C.G. 2. State of CKhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Department ofWater Resource, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. C.G. 1 ^.ffw^^.), j 'sSuS.^" 3. The ChiefEngineer, Water Resources Department, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarth 4. The ChiefEngineer, Minimata Hashdeo Bango Dam Division, Bilaspur, C.G. WRITPETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTIQNQFINDIA FOR ISSUENCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBTION, CERTIORAM, AND ANY OTHER WRITS, DffiECTIONS OR ORDERS XI-HC-22 •TSi ^l-ltM^, ~«^W ,WWW'y. sn^i^i ft:iR?3TI^T Wqra"Hft?T "'A • \SS~^ 1 o fc ajrai'roaWafOT 20-4-2006 Shri Hemant Kesharwani, Shri vinay Pandey, Panel | Heard. By thispetition under Artic ii is submitted that the petitionet Operator in the Department ofl 7-TO-1998 in the pay scaie of Rs| ^ounset Tor tne petitioner. ILawyer ror the State. Rs.2750-70-3000-75-4400. tt isi ^l^^^ I^^ <^1^.!'(. ^siPgiTsn^r le 226/227 of the Constitution of ?ndia, was appointed on the post of Pymp Water Resources vide order dated 1^050-75-3950-80-4500, thereafter vide order dated 4-1-1999 (Annexur^-P/1) the pay scale was reduced to submitted that tne petitioner fiied represeniation, but that has n|)t been decided by the authorities. Learned counsel referred to d<|>cument Annexure-P/4 bywhich the Superintending Engineer (Admnj) has writtfen a letter to the Principal Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Waier Resourees Department, Raipur, regarding the pay scale jof Pump Operators; the State has not taKenanydecision. Counsel for the State subhiits that for the present, the petitioner may De airectea to maKe a repr^sentatjonafresn before tne concerned eompetent authorities and if su(:h representation is made, the same snaii De consiaer^ and decided.l Maving oonsidered and v<ithout expressing any opinion on the merits ofthe case, in the opiniojiof this Court, ends ofjustice wiil be servea ir a airection is given representation afresh raising hl authority of respondenis alongwi< o the petitioner to make a detailed |s gnevances Defore ine coropetent h a copy of the petition and this order ^ within a period of 15 days from t^day and on such representation being [^^f^ XI-HC-22 ^sr '^wns^, dTfl'y'i'a, l^irey *iwaT%^irai ^.L....^^^ ra^a" sn^r^i f^W3IIS?I sb'-li'* •Q^l 1-. Gowri ^ 3ii^?i'FRnw;Hf5?r T^- reaiuired Tiieci.tt-ife competent authority o1 oy a reasonea order on its owr| as possiDie prereraDly wiinin a| receipt of representation. If maae ciear that if any grlevanc|e the remedy avaiiable'under the With the aforesaid obseni Certified copy as per ruie^. 'WlfepftTqTOyif ^ TSIzt Tf^RgT ^aiNqsiRW the respondents shail decide the same merits in accoraance wnn !aw as early penoa or two momns rrom me date of me peiitioner may be neard. It is stiii remains, the petitioner may avail aw. 'ations, ihis petition stands disposed of. Fak'nruddin Judge ^ [^-ys^ >>