IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2445 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:08.04.2011. Sanjeev Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Darshana Devi ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Satish Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to argue the case on merits. He prays for some time to vacate the demised premises. Hence, this revision petition is dismissed on merits. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in possession of the demised premises (shop) since the year 1986 and he would require some time to find an alternative accommodation. In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, without issuing notice to the other party, another period of 3 months is granted to the petitioner to vacate the demised premises i.e. on or before 11.07.2011, subject to his furnishing of an undertaking before the Rent Controller and also clearing all the arrears of rent, if any due, within 15 days from today. The petitioner shall also keep on paying the monthly rent for the ensuing months up to 11.07.2011 to the respondent on or before every 10th of each calendar month. It is made clear that if the petitioner violates any of the conditions of the undertaking, then he would be liable for action under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. April 08, 2011. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE