1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1446 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.184 OF 2011 Manigandan Velmani Nadar .Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr.Prashant Gurav, Advocate, for the Applicant Smt.V.R.Bhosale, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 15TH DECEMBER, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. On 16th June, 2011 after the applications were heard and after it was indicated that applicant No.1 would not be admitted to bail, the learned counsel for the applicant Manigandan Nadar sought leave to withdraw Criminal Application. Criminal Application was allowed to be withdrawn. Today, 2 the learned counsel for the applicant raises same arguments. Manigandan the applicant is a person to whom the witnesses have attributed causing of injuries to the first informant, the first informant's mother as well as one Kannan. Considering the nature of role attributed to the applicant and the fact that Manigandan had hit the victim, the first informant Murgan by a chopper on his head, the applicant is not entitled to bail. Hearing of the appeal is expedited. Criminal Application stands rejected. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)