CRM-M No. 14990 of 2011 **** Narinder Kaur and another vs. State of Punjab Present: Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S. S. Chandumajra, DAG, Punjab. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 84 dated 19.04.2011, under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC registered at Police Station Navi Baradari, Jalandhar. On 17.05.2011 the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel states that the petitioners only identified the vendor at the time of the sale deed and there is no proof or allegation that they knew that the power of attorney was not genuine.” Learned DAG, on instructions from ASI Kuldeep Singh, has accepted the factual assertion that the petitioners had only identified the vendor though he says that their complicity in the matter cannot be denied at this stage. Be that as it may, in these circumstances, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. In case they are arrested, they shall be released on bail by the investigating officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE May 25, 2011 sunita