5. appa 100-11.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 100 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3392 OF 2010 Premlata Vinodkumar Gupta .. Applicant Vs Shashikant Krushanaji Patil & Ors .. Respondents Mr. Yogesh Dalvi for the Applicant Mr. D.P. Adsule, A.P.P. for the State CORAM : P.V. HARDAS & N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 11th MARCH, 2011. PER COURT: 1. By this application, the applicant / original petitioner in Criminal Writ Petition No. 3392 of 2010 seeks recall of the order of this Court dated 6th December 2010 dismissing the petition for default. In the aforesaid order, a Division Bench has pointed out that the petitioner had not disclosed filing of earlier petition i.e Criminal Writ Petition No. 1130 of 2010 which came to be disposed of by this Court on 8th September 2010. It appears that none had represented the petitioner when this petition i.e Criminal Writ Petition No. 3392 of 2010 came to be dismissed in default. 2. We have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and we 1 5. appa 100-11.doc have made a query with him as to whether the earlier petition had been disclosed by him in Writ Petition No. 3390 of 2010. The learned Counsel for the petitioner very candidly states before us that filing and dismissal of earlier Writ Petition had not been referred to by the petitioner in the present Writ Petition. On that count itself, Writ Petition No. 3392 of 2010 was liable to be dismissed and the Division Bench has accordingly observed so in its order dated 6th December 2010. In that background, therefore, according to us, the present application for restoration is also liable to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed with no orders as to costs. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J ] [ P.V. HARDAS, J ] 2 5. appa 100-11.doc 3