( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2821 OF 2010 IN REVIEW APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 4019 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 512 OF 2009 Vaininath s/o Ashruba Ghodke & others APPLICANTS VERSUS Gopinath s/o Punjaba Ghodke & others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. S.S. Wagh, advocate for the applicants. Mr. M.M. Patil (Beedkar), advocate for respondents No. 1 and 2. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 15th June, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. In view of “Shobha Bajirao Damodar v. Triratna Krida and Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Akola and others” 2009 (1) Mh.L.J. and “Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and another v. N. Raju Reddiar and another” (AIR 1997 SC 1005), the filing of review application by another advocate after changing the original advocate is improper and impermissible. The practice of filing review application by changing the advocate ( 2 ) will have to be deprecated. The review application is, therefore, liable to be dismissed. It is accordingly dismissed. The civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing review application is also dismissed, without going into merits thereof. No costs. [V.R. KINGAONKAR] JUDGE NPJ/ca2821-10