IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2108 of 2010 BETWEEN Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. ... PETITIONER AND Smt. Rajaboina Laxmi and others. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner : MR. N. MOHAN KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: MR. V. TULSI REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: Petitioner/insurance company while defending the accident OP.No.24 of 2009 has examined R.W.1 and marked Exs.B1 to B4 on 10.03.2010. Among the said marked documents, Ex.B2 is the extract of the driving licence issued by RTA. Thereafter, when the OP was posted for arguments, the petitioner has filed the present application being I.A.No.640 of 2010 seeking to summon the Officer-in-Charge, RTA, Siddipet with a view to lead evidence to show that the driving licence – Ex.B2 is not a genuine licence. The Court below rejected the said application. Hence, this revision. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The petitioner itself marked Ex.B2 through their witness R.W.1 and it cannot now be allowed to lead evidence in rebuttal thereof. Till the present application is filed, it was the specific case of the petitioner that the driver had the authorization to drive the vehicle on the basis of Ex.B2. Hence, allowing the petitioner to produce evidence in rebuttal and contrary to its evidence on record being wholly impermissible, the Court below rightly rejected the said application. I am, therefore, not convinced that any interference is called for by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The Court below shall decide the OP expeditiously in accordance with law on or before 30.06.2011. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J April 8, 2011 DSK