1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1342 OF 2002 IN PETITION NO. 270 OF 1992 FORMER PAUPER PETITION NO. 14 OF 1991 Indira Jayantilal Pandya .. Petitioner. vs. Nirmala alias Narmada Jayantilal Pandya & Ors. .. Defendants. Mr. N.J. Pandya, H.J. Pandya present i/by I.J. Pandya in person. Mr. Zariwala for respondents 1 and 2. CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J. CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J. CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J. DATE : 15th July, DATE : 15th July, DATE : 15th July, 2005. P.C. . The motion has been taken for admitting document, a copy of the original documentary evidence dated 12.8.1991 and 14.8.1991 and copy of the original documents of 13.4.1992 which has been supposed to have been recorded and forming part of the probate petition No. 14 of 1991. By prayer (e) of the motion it has been prayed that the probate petition No. 270 of 1992 in which the probate has 2 been issued by this Court be revoked. In my opinion, the motion is wholly misconceived. The Probate Petition No. 270 of 1992 is already granted and the probate is issued on 7.2.1995. The caveator appearing in person states that review petition has been filed. Till and until orders are passed in the review petition, the present motion is frivolous and misconceived. Motion dismissed. No order as t costs.