IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1769 of 2008 MOST SHANTI DEVI & ORS Versus RAM NARAYAN PRASAD SAH & ORS ----------- 21 13.01.2010 Mr. Phushkar Narain Shahi, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the suit, Title Suit No.38 of 1981 has been disposed of by the trial court and as such this application has become infructuous. The present civil revision application, in fact, was directed against the order dated 10.7.2008 passed in Misc. Appeal No.26 of 2001, whereby and whereunder, the lower appellate court had dismissed the said appeal by affirming the order dated 20.2.2001 passed by the trial court in Title Suit NO.38 of 1981 as with regard to appointment of receiver in respect of the suit property. It has to be kept in mind that such order of both the court below was not allowed to prevail when the present case was admitted for final hearing on 18.12.2008 and as there was complete conflict between the parties on the point of appointment of receiver as also none of the counsels were prepared to function as receiver, this Court by an interim order had directed the Sub.Judge-I, Barh to function as receiver during pendency of the suit. Now that suit has been disposed of the interim order would automatically come to an end but the receiver must give his account to the trial court if not already furnished by him. 2 With the aforesaid observations and directions this application is disposed of as having become infructuous. Kanchan/Abhay. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)