WP(C) 1755/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. J. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. B. K. Sarma, learned Standing counsel, SWD. The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure-4 minutes of the meeting held on 04.12.2 010 by the State Level Committee in the matter of interview of AWWs/AWHs under D hemaji ICDS Project. According to the petitioner, he being a member of the Selec tion Committee ought to have invited in the said meeting. The Committee consis ted of by the Chairman, the Member Secretary, two Members and three Invitees. Th e meeting was convened for the purpose of examining the relevant records pertain ing to the interview/ selection of AWWs/AWHs. The Committee found certain anomal ies have been detected. Same was also indicated in the minutes of the meeting. T he said minutes of the meeting held on 04.12.2010 was communicated by the letter dated 22.02.2011. The grievance of the petitioner is that since he was a Member of the Selection C ommittee, he ought to have invited in the said meeting and no decision could hav e been taken in his absence. The petitioner was inducted in the Selection Commit tee as Social Worker Member. On the other hand, the meeting was convened by the State Level Committee for ve rification of the records etc. Merely because the petitioner was not invited in the meeting, it cannot be said that the proceeding in the meeting is vitiated. T he meeting was convened for the particular purpose and to verify the anomalies a lleged in conducting the selection. The particular process having been undertake n to find out the irregularities and also in view of the fact that the said meet ing was held about three months back, I am of the considered opinion that the wr it petition is misconceived. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.