IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 1985 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 23, 2011 Rajinder Bala .... PETITIONER Vs. State of Punjab and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH * * * Present : Mr. R.S.Chahal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. * * * AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL) Counsel for respondent No. 2 states that the apprehension of the petitioner is misplaced as the service of the petitioner is not being terminated by respondent No. 3, as alleged, and she would be allowed to continue as per the terms of contract. Counsel states that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) May 23, 2011 JUDGE pj