1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2952 OF 2010 Smt. Parubai @ Subhabai Rambhau Thombare (Through the Constituted Power of Attorney) Shankar Rambhau Thombare .... Petitioner Vs. Shri Ganpat Dhondu Walanj & Ors. .... Respondents Mr. A. Y. Sakhare, Senior Counsel i/b. M/s. YKS Legal for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATE : MAY 6, 2010 P.C. : Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners. The Petitioners are the original Defendants. By the impugned order, an Application made by the Petitioner for seeking permission to lead further evidence on the basis of certain documents has been rejected by the Trial Court. A permission 2 was sought to lead further evidence on the basis of certain documents which were not produced in the suit. The said Application was made at the stage when the suit was fixed for arguments. Moreover, an Application earlier made by the Petitioners for production of documents has already been rejected. 2. As the suit is fixed for final arguments and as the impugned order is purely interlocutory in nature, no interference is called for at this stage. The Petitioners can always challenge the impugned order while preferring an Appeal, against decree passed in the suit if the same be adverse to the Petitioners. 3. Subject to what is observed above, the Writ Petition is rejected. [A.S. OKA, J.]