WP(C) 6514/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. K. Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. M. Gogoi, learned Standing counsel, Education Department. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for considerat ion of his case for compassionate appointment on account of death of his father on 12.05.2004 while was in service. While the learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on Anenxure-6 communication dated 07.08.2006 made to the Co mmissioner & Secretary to the Govt. of Assam in the Education Department by the Director of Elementary Education, Assam, Ms. M. Gogoi, learned Standing counsel, Education department submits that there is clear bar in considering the case o f the petitioner as per the scheme for compassionate appointment. She further su bmits that after six years of expiry of the father of the petitioner there is no question of consideration of the case of the petitioner for compassionate appoi ntment. Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case of the rival par ties, I dispose of the writ petition providing that the respondents may examine the case of the petitioner in terms of the guidelines formulated in Achyut Ranj an Das vs. State of Assam and others reported in 2006 (4) GLT 674 and the judgm ent dated 02.07.2010 passed in a batch of writ petition lead case being W.P.(C) No. 2620/09 (Faziron Nessa vs. State of Assam and others). Needless to say that the petitioner cannot claim consideration of his case against any particular pos t or service and the consideration will be strictly as per the parameters and ya rdstick laid down in the guidelines. Writ petition is disposed of.