1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2750 OF 2007 AND WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2752 OF 2007 AND WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2754 OF 2007 AND WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2755 OF 2007 AND WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2756 OF 2007 AND WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2809 OF 2007 AND WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2810 OF 2007 Maharashtra Security Guards & General Kamgar Association .. Petitioner. Versus Security Guards Bord for Greater Bombay & Thane District & Ors. .. Respondents. Ms.Shraddha Mohite for the petitioner. (W.P.No.2750/07) Ms.R.J. Todankar for petitioner (W.P.No.2752/07, 2754/07, 2755/07, 2756/07, 2809/07, 2810/07) Mr.M.S. Topkar for respondent No.1 (W.P.No.2752/07, 2756/07, 2809/07, 2810/07) Mr.P.M. Palshikar for respondent No.1 (W.P.No.2754/ 07, 2755/07) Ms.A.K. Savla for B.M.C. (W.P.No.2750/07) Ms.L.S. Desai i/by Pallavi Divekar for respondent No.1 (W.P.No.2750/07) Mr.N.M. Makandar i/by Rajesh Gehani for respondent No.2 (W.P.No.2752/07, 2754/07, 2755/07) Mr.B.K. Ashok for respondent No.3 (W.P. No.2809/07, 2810/07) CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & J.P. DEVADHAR, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J. DATED : 29th January, 2008 DATED : 29th January, 2008 DATED : 29th January, 2008 P.C. : 1. Learned counsel appearing for the parties in all these writ petitions fairly state that the above 2 writ petitions are squarely covered on fact and law by two Division Bench judgments of this Court in the cases of (i) Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi V/s. The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Others (O.S. Writ Petition No.563/07) decided on 21-6-2007 and (ii) Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Union V/s. Pune District Security Guards Boards and others (A.S. Writ Petition No.1972/05) decided on 27-9-2007. 2. Accordingly, all the writ petitions are disposed of in terms thereof. The parties would take steps and the Board would act according to the directions contained in both the judgments. Liberty to the parties to raise all pleas before the Board. We further make it clear that the period prescribed under those orders shall operate from today. 3. With these observations, all the writ petitions are disposed of with no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE J.P. DEVADHAR, J.