IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF NOVEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.8850 of 2009 Between: Ms. Malini Byanna … Petitioner And State of A.P., through P.P., High Court of A.P., & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Satish Kumar Varma for Sri Milind G Gokhale Counsel for respondents 1&2: Addl. Public Prosecutor Counsel for respondent No.3: Sri J. Anil Kumar This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.8850 of 2009 ORDER:- The petitioner’s counsel is absent. Sri Satish Kumar Varma representing Sri Milind G Gokhale Advocate for the petitioner says that the petitioner’s counsel communicated to the party about listing of this matter and that the petitioner took away all the other ﬁles from his oﬃce and that time may be granted. His request for time is rejected. He did not put forth any arguments. The petitioner is absent. It appears that the petitioner has no interest to pursue the petition except to drag on the matter. Hence, the criminal petition is dismissed. ___________________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J Date: 29.11.2011 ES