IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3113 of 2010 RAM NATH MUKHIYA . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3 19.5.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the State. Petitioner is apprehending arrest for the offences under Sections 363,365 and 370 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Madhepur ( Lakhanaur) P.S. case No. 217 of 2008. Allegation in the First Information Report is that the younger brother of the informant Phule Paswan was abducted by the petitioner and he is traceless. Counsel for the petitioner submits that Phule Paswan appeared after some time, disclosed that he had gone to Goa for earning his livelihood. In case of bail matter of co-accused Raman Kamat, Phule Paswan appeared before the District and Sessions Judge, Madhubani and gave statement that he was not abducted. He had gone to Goa. The order passed by the Sessions Judge has been brought on record by the petitioner. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory 2 bail on behalf of above named petitioner Ram Nath Mukhiya is allowed. In the event of his arrest/surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, petitioner shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of (Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the ACJM, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in Madhepur (Lakhanaur) P.S. Case No. 277 of 2008 ( G.R. No. 1010/2008), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar