WP(C) 339/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I.A. ANSARI Heard Mr. M.U. Mondol, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. BK Sharma, le arned counsel, for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner is, in brief, thus: The petitioner was a pplicant for appointment to the post of Anganwadi Worker at No.105 Islampur Anga nwadi Center under Nayeralga ICDS Project, Nayeralga, Dhubri. The petitioner cla ims that the private respondents, who have been selected as Anganwadi Worker, do es not belong to the place, where the Anganwadi Center is located. As the dispute, raised by the petitioner, is substantially factual in na ture, this Court is of the view that in the facts and circumstances of the prese nt case, respondent No.2, namely, Director of Social Welfare, Government of Assa m, shall look into the grievances of the petitioner and make enquiry in this reg ard and, in accordance with the findings of the inquiry, pass appropriate order( s). Whatever decision is reached, in this regard, by the respondent No.2 or what ever order is, ultimately, passed by the respondent No.2, on the petitioner’s gr ievances, shall be communicated, in writing, to the petitioner and if the petiti oner feels aggrieved by the decision9s), which may be reached, or the order(s), which may be passed by the respondent No.2, the petitioner shall remain at liber ty to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. The whole exercise, so directed, shall be completed within a period of t wo months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by the respondent No. 2. The petitioner may furnish to the respondent No.2 a certified copy of this or der along with a copy of the writ petition and annexures thereto. Furnish a copy of this order to the learned counsel for the respondents.