IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.951 of 2006 VAKIL YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3. 5.8.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the informant. This Cr. Revision has been filed against the order dated 21.9.2006 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, (F.T.C.-I), Jamui in S. C. No. 273 of 2006 thereby the petition filed by petitioner under Section 227 Cr.P.C. has been rejected. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no material in the case-diary to frame charge against this petitioner. However, on perusal of the impugned order, it appears that this petitioner, who is one of the named accused persons, was present at the time of commission of the offence from the side of the accused. Victim died after two days of discharge but post-mortem report of the victim goes to show that victim died as a result of inflicting injuries in the course of said offence. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order dated 21.9.2006 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, (F.T.C.-I), Jamui in S. C. No. 273 of 2006. Accordingly, this Cr. Revision is rejected at the admission stage itself. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)