p 0) c+ m o Hi 4 /n o m H-v <-)• H-» .'» >a w m H mi+ ffl no q'l 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 5) m Qj 1 g rt- o m ' 00 1 H, H; o e m ffl r<- rt- m fn 1^^/ •^i ^;1 Hi, ^ffi^ ss is^. •SJTT " hj* ^P E> f$' -£) w yy s; <+ M 4 O i-j 1-" • c<- | H- d-m 1-' n 1-jo- h>. 1 03 <+ m M o §>"• g , _ 1 ml»l rl- O 4 m l~t m g' ri-^ffl ^ »°. v cn ,>-! ES'y i-j t-J ] c+ m t-^ ftt CU ". s; I .ci m f" ' c+ P' ' .0 ni B ffl d-0) m !3 <n I 01 W IT, C+ P. h">'3 Q. m . 1 c-(- ih3 cn ' £L £+ ff 'm ^ ^ o | d) m i-1 ?• a'. d- m Cft cf-Sl c+ f <; ff" ff i3~'T) m a? (TI r .'n P m d- ,_, i-iyl-'U | ft.h^m m '-I 0) H', fTO H< t ffl S^ m n EU M c: 3 (a. m hl • 01 mn r+ !-'• o 3 cn ff} 3 ri- m 3o Itl .ffc ^ ("i po rti 01 h'- p. fn n ffi t ??'^1 s' e^i l<j7 T) 0)ri- m •-< Bl 3 g m ^ ao 1 '^ :$ 0 lill ^"i^ Xa' 0 eo m n>~j m po 1 /o (&t ^ic < M !-< t <4> '^l. 1-Ml ut »-> ffl ;^ l^ .n' ?rt!^^< o ^ ] • t< 3 po 3 K> .'s^ 'mCw U O SS'.mV ffl O ffi H i-j >1 rh H» Hi QJ B o o ri- g: ai c+ i-< rf- tr H-*<; !3- M .ffi ^ ys • m o p<; r+ d-m ffi 3 O .00 0 m ^ffm.'^ I -?• ffl Hp, m n) . 0] d- »-i>d '<: i3' m 4 0.4 oi m ^S' ~ ro ~ '" a>31 51.1 ld o).n c: fB ?iT<1 I c+t+a^ (n'^i <) m H. |-'T3 ca, S £i£t S £j>v^V^;i c+ O m ^ u ai HTB d- rt- ^ ^ •ti rf- Ka 1-i &"m H--\& 'S m ~ ' m ca fo'sg &?8J^i?"^.^ ^'"'So.^" '^c 0)p '.Q l-"^- m ^ 3"i B^ h-1 O ffl I-1 m ^i f^ h-1!—^, c* V* <-1 03h" h-J n <-1 ffl • S) U3 !\0 I ..?. '^. P' -Xi-JIC-78 s^r ^141^, Sxftwre, feroy MIKMI g^^llcb ¥FT 200 3TT^ T5W (1?^^) dllSTT ifil RFTR; (TSIT 3n^5!T gi'TOi gCTTW (ffef W^T TOlfedfrr WIrfT'ff Wt rf^CT: ^; aiRriT a:n^ST ! Ui^ibiUNbENCH^ Hon'ble Shri Justice L,C. Bhadoo & Hon'ble Shri Justice Dhirehdra Mishra. CRJM!NAL_AP|:;'EAL,No. 37/ 2000, APPELLANT Verslus RESPONDSNT Rameshv/ar S/o Ramadhar Patei Aged about 20 years, R/o Prema Bag, Baikunthpur, District Koriya, CG. State of M.P. (now CG) CRIM!NAL^Pft'EAL_NQ, 43^2000. APPELLANT Versilis RESPONDENT COIM RIMJNALAPPI Sonaiai S/o Bahadur Aged about 28 years, R/o Prema Bag, Baikunthpur, District Koriya, CG. State of M.P. (nowCG) AL No.84/2000 APPELLANT 1. Hansial S/o Sundarsingh Gond Aged abeut 21^years, R/o Prema Bag, Baikunthpur, District Korjya, CG. P.T.O. ^ :^ :.:^ ./ ./ •f ;..^:-78 ;-rw[wf?-ri¥ aaiT srR?T gwR; ssi-Knqra^, ^Tii^'iio, Tiirrray ^l^dl Sh41ch CT?T 200 sn^T cra^(i^3^.r) SWTW •Hf?(T 3T^T (Fiied from Cenirsi' Ja Vers SESPONDENT Shn Abnav Tiwari an accused/appeiiants. Shri U.N.S. Deo and Prosecutors for i'esDoncient' Since a;! the aboveme same judgmant datsd 27.1 150/2000, ihey are being dis; (ORAL) {Dated L.C. Bhadoo.J The accused/appelia qiiestioning the legality and dated 27.10.2000 whsreby tt Saikunthpur, sfter holdins 323/34 of !he iPC, sent iBrafewl? wrat'^'IWt tRrezn: ^aTf^w^r . 2. Rameshvvar S/o Ramadhar Patsi Aged about 20 years, R/o Prerna Bag, Saikunthpur, Districi Koriya, rT. \/v3. Bilaspurthre!.;g;i its Superintendent) State or' M.P. ('novv CG) Shn A.K. F:>rasad Advocates for ;he Shri Ashish Shukia Additionai Public -tate. itioned appeals are arlsing out of th9 .2000 passsd in Sessions Tria! No. osed of by this commcn judgment. 'UDGMENT 30-3-2007} |its have preferred ihese appeals jorreciness of the impugnsd judgment learned Additional Sessions Judge, ^m guilty under ssctions 302/34 and jnced each of ihsm to undergo P.T.O. 1HIT ^. ^." iC-78 3l~^:TE|llRTW W 3TR^T SPTW TSf ^m\vW, SrftffTC, fsRTCiy MIHrtl 9'iqTcft WT 200 3TT^7T iTaW (^tg^tT) ?^nw Hf?ti STT^T imprisonment for life and payment of fine to further uffi 302 cf the !PC, and to undet of the IPC. Substantive s| directsd to run concurrentlv. 2, Cass of the prosecutij 9 p.m. accused Pap.pu aii) Deornaii, had brouahf one Deomati. Pappu a'ias Han^ and Brijlal to his house for c| his residence. Whsn accu; alias Hanshra] v/ere taking t| Laiian (since deceased) as Sonalal and Rameshwar st and sn the meanwhife, acct Pappu, and Rameshvi'ar st£ fists, When Deomati tried Hanshraj gavs beating to he| and Deomati sustained injd Deor"iati, neighbours namd Raiesh Kymar, Ramesh Tl ;'esched the piace of occ' hospitsl. Deomati iodged Police Sation Baikunthpur. investigation. While in polic memoranciym or' Ex. P-1 EfiTiffei^tT miRff ^ te^l' <^R?R: ^srRrtrsn^T pay fine of Rs. 200/-, in ciefau't of dergo Ri for one month, under ssction go Sl t'or one month under section 323 intences under both the sections are arted ?n, in brief, is that on 9.3.2000 at a&out is Hanshra], the son of complainant alogram of fish which v/as cooted by hraj had invitsd Rameshwar, Sonalal inner. After taking dinner Brijiai ';eft for ;ed Sorialal, Rameshwar and Pappu isir meal, Hanshraj alias Pappu asked •to whv he was residins In his hcuse. irted abusing ana threatening Lailan used persons namely Hanshraj aiias beating Lai'an with c!ub, hands and to intervene, accussd Pappu alias also, on account of v/hich both Lal'an |ries. On hearing the cries raised by ,iy Shivpujan Mis'nra, Neeraj T'wari, Iwari, Ganesh Tiwari and P.S. Rathia jrrence. They took Lallan to the the report Ex. P-8 on 10.3.2000 in Investisating Officer took yp t'ne |2 custody accuseci Rameshwar gave in pursuance of v/hich a bamboo P.T.O. / [ .'L ~^ - r .t i ii •va" :.y ./IC-78 »f .;..>•' y w^rwf^-ri^ tT'TT 31TOT OTTO 3 r •^Tprrcpr^ t<)ifl^i|!i, K^iyy KTq^TT 9iWcb CT.T 200 3T(^T qxg? (^F^P") gTarwHfstTsn^T stick v/as seized uncfer Ex.l was seized under £x. P-3. succurnbed to the injuries| intimation Ex. P-16 was giv<{ Lal'an v/as conducied and Posi morSem on the bociy Chikunjuri PVV-12 in the' and in the post mortem red dsath vvas injyry over the \| deaih was homicidal in natul P-2. Blood stained soil and plain soi; pite plan Ex. P-4 v»'as prepared. Lalian in the hospital on 12.3.2000. Merg !iv<^n to the poiice. InquesS on'ihe body o's fncuest repoil: Ex. P-14 was prepared. [ot' Lailan vi/as conducted by Dr. D.K. Qommuniiy Healih Centre, 3a]kunt.hpu.r re^ort Ex. P-18, he opined that causs of ital organ, brain and stomach snd the te. After completion or" t| fi;ed in the Court of Chisf J turn committed the case to from <vhere isarned Addl received the sams on transrl Prosecution, in ordei accused persons, examined ot' the accused persons we. the Code of Crimina! Proci materia1 appearing against pleaded their jnnocence anci We have heard learn the materia! availabie on're. ^wfeT.ftT mRft' ff te^ <Ri^;i< ^srf^TlTaTT^T he investiaation the charae sheet was ludicial Magistrate, Baikunthpur \vho in Ithe Court of Sessions Judge, Sargu.is Itiona! Sessions Judge, Baikunthpur fer fortrial. to establish the charge against the as many as 15 witnesses. Statements 1'e also recorded under Section 313 or' (idure in which they have denied the them in the prosecution case and |false impllcation in the case. fsd counssl for the parties and perused brd. P.T.O. ICT" [11 "^SlS^SSlSiS.Kca^S^^^SSlSSia^— — ''^t „/ ^C-78 y y ir' 3TTOT ifiT i^l'R; (W3TI^Tsh4i°h iliW 3^T ?qTOra?, ®TfrHTTS, Hl^l^l Sh^l* CTT 200 an^TTiTcR' (^{^cft^ar) ^RdW Hf?cT 3T1^T Counsel for the' acc; fact that the death of Lall^i PW-1 Ramesh Tiwari, PW-t stated in the-ir evidencs th; Ramsshwar attacked the d. w'ho conducted the post mb\ has stated that the death sstabhshed that ihe death ofl As far as involvernen't in question is concerned, r|. stated that accused Sonala! the dying declaration Ex. P-[ 'Kanahiya Prasad Gupta (if assauited Laiian with hand does not bear the signati witnesses has staied thatl Deomati and as such. thert accused Sonaial with ihe conviciion of accused IPC !s iiabie to be set aside. As far as accused F| are concerned, PVV-1 Ramf that on the fatefui night h4 commouon he along vvith h| ths spot and savu' that Soni accused F'appu alias -iant Laiian v./ith shoes and han| Sondla hantls "Rrafepfrr ITTCTT' ff ts^fs <RIWK ^; 3lRlIT 3TRSFT ised/appeliants have not disputed the |n was homicidal in nature. Moreover, P Ganesh Tiv/ari, PVV-4 Deomati, have |at accused Pappu alias Hanshraj and leceased. PW-12 Df. D.K. Chikunjuri 1'te'm examination cn the bodv of Lalian \vas hornicidal in naiure. Thus, It is Lallan 'was homlcidai in nature. of the accused/appeliants in the crime |one of the prosecution witnesses has lassaulted Lalian or Deomati. Though in p7 recorded by the Investigating Officsr W-13), it is mentioned that Sonala! jand fist, but the said dying declarailon Ire of Laiian. iVloreover, none or" the Sonaiai attacked ';he deceased or te is no evidence in order to connect ;rime in quesiion anci iherefore, the under section 302 and 323 of the |appu aiias Hanshraj and Rarnssh'A'ar bsh Tiwari has stated in his evidsnce was in his house and after hearing is brother Ganesh and Neeraj 'went to ;lal was aoing from the spot whereas fehraj and Rarneshwar v/ere beeiina hs. When Deomati tried to interx'ens', P.T.O. ;1 : i Jlil f s// ^ -rfC-78 ::?'' w 3TWI'sfiT K^ffi (mTw^rgOTR; 3 r •-yi<4ici^, (STfly'is, &di«y ^II^C^I 9^1 ch- TR- 200 3Ti^?T (raw (^srfggr^r) S?(TTW •ate'w^r accused Pappu alias Hansf has stated in her evidence fish and v/hile Pappu alias they started abysing each| Ramesh'A'ar attacked her tW Colony, Pappu aiias Hansh| further stated that accused ana' befeil him. PW-12 Dr. Ct moiiem examination on thel evidence that there v/as al reglon in the size of 2.inch brov/, there v'/as lacerated v| inch x 14 inch, there \vas pes in the sizs of Vi inch x 1 Yi membrane, lungs, wind pipi s'iomach in ihe size of 3 % He stated that the deceasecj vita! organs especially on th^ homicidal in nature. From the above Rameshv/ar snd Pappu ai v,'i:h club, hands and fists. caused and deceased diedl 12.3.2000 inthehospitat.Mc] of moment v.'hen deceased ths residence of Pappu a! +i-11frfifft wRrif ft' te^t •rfSresre ^sri^iTsn^r iraj attacked her aiso. PW-4 Deomati hat on the fatefui day she had cooked •ianshraj and Lailan were taking rneals, other, in the meamvhile, accussd ;ce v/ith club. When she v/ent towards •aj and Sonala! followed her. She has Rameshvfar a.ttacked Lallan with club '.K. Chikunjuri who conducted the post dead body of Lal!an has stated in his stitahed wound on the right parieta! which \.vas 3 inch above the right eye 'oynd in ths right eye in the sizs of '/< iled wound on the ieft side of the head inch, there was redness in ;ne brain, , there vvas a punctured wound in the ich out of vvhich, food v/as coming out. died OR account of the iniuries on the brain and stomach and the death v/as Ividence it is clear' that accused |as Hanshraj assaulted the deceased fijury report shovvs that no fracture v/as three days after the incident i.e. on jreover, the quarrei erupted on the spur |and the accused v/ere takins meai at i|as Hanshraj. Thus from the above P.T.O. iiiiin ji ,/' AC-78 ...Sf'/ 9 3f[^l <S1 1 tW3T1^Tst)4 3^T 3n?(T^q', SiftWTS', Kniyy in'fmTawraT'••••"••••••••'•••••• ?n[ 200 sn^r iraw ((^rfg^tT) ??aTWHf?(T3n^T evldence the involvefrient established. However, ther4 assauited the deceased vv| intention te cause his deattti moment. Thus, from the post mortem report it can persons were attacking the ihsir acS is !!ke!y to cause aoainst accused Pappu alict travel bevond seciion 304-11 As far as convictl -<amespwar under oectiorl Deomati PW-4 has c!ear!y 4 ailas Hanshrai and Ramei conviction unaer section convincinc evidence. In the result, appea! irnpugned judgrnent of conv: Courr is sei aside so far as acquitted of tne charges un< IPC. He is on baH. He nes bonds are discharged. Appeais of accuseo are partiy ailowsd. Tneir cor set. aside and instead ther Efirafert^T iTrorr' ir' te^t' Ttezn: ^ .3Tf^T 3TI^r |of accused Pappu alias Hanshraj is is no evidence ihat accused persons !|th preparation, pre-meditation or with as the quarrel started on the spur of abfove facts, evidence on record and the |safely be 'inferred that when accused [jeceased, they had the knowledge that death of Laiian and as such offence |.s Hanshraj and Rameshwar does.not lofthe IPC. |on of Pappu alias Hanshraj and :323/34 of the !PC is concernsd, ttated in he.r evldence that both Pappu ihwar assauited hsr, therefore, their 32(3/34'of the IPC Is based on iegai and 32P/3 of appellant Sonalal is aliowed, The jction and sentence passed by the trial it pertains to accused Sonalal. H-3 is lier sections 302/34 and 323/ 34 of the jd not surrender to 'cail bond. His bal! ib'appu aiias Hanshraj and Rameshvr'ar viction under Seciion 302 of the 'PC is sof. thev are convicred under Section P.T.O. ./ ./ /'' /HC-78 ^ST ^ITqT^PT, l9'ci1+l'l(», (slcrtltiy »r il.^' •!-^^s II B; ^ll^dl ?h*4|cb CT^T 200 3TT^?T CRra? ( y< (^<s|viff) 3TR?T °BT fefsfi (TXfT 3T[^T OTre ^ w 0, TOnw H{?(T w^r 304-11/34ofthe IPC and serft However, their conviction maintained. it is stated that Rameshwar are in deteniidn have completed more thafl 7| iiberty forthwith if not require<|i ;tenced to undergo Rl for seven years. ^nder section 323/34 of the IPC is accused Pappu alias Hanshraj and since 11.3.2000 and thereby they years of imprisonment. They be set at in any oinercase. - Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge 'bl^lcl'fl-f WRTf ff fSCS (teZTC ^.iTRmsn^T Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O. (&