IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7028 of 2010 KRISHNA SINGH WIFE OF LATE VINAY KUMAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA RAJJU SAH LANE, P.O. RAMNA, P.S. MITHANPURA, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCE DEPARTMENT (HIGHER EDUCATION) GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DIRECTOR, HUMAN RESOURCE DEPARTMENT (HIGHER EDUCATION) GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, B.R. AMBEDKAR BIHAR UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR, BIHAR 6. THE REGISTRAR, B.R. AMBEDKAR BIHAR UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR, BIHAR 7. THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR, B.R. AMBEDKAR BIHAR UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR, BIHAR 8. THE FINANCE OFFICER, B.R. AMBEDKAR BIHAR UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR, BIHAR 9. THE PRINCIPAL, R.D.S. COLLEGE, MUZAFFARPUR ----------- 2 22.04.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the respondent-University. The grievance of the petitioner is that her husband who was working as Demonstrator in the department of Physics, R.D.S. College, Muzaffarpur, however he got missing since 17th of August, 1991 and as such a F.I.R. to the above effect was lodged by the son of the petitioner with Mithanpura Police Station, Muzaffarpur on 7th February, 1992. It is submitted that the husband of the petitioner be deemed to have met civil death and consequent upon his civil death the son of the petitioner was appointed as a Routine Clerk on compassionate ground in R.D.S. College, Muzaffarpur by competent authority of the University as stated in paragraph 6 of the writ application. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- University submits that the allegations made in the writ application needs to be verified from the records, and as such only after making such necessary verification any order can be passed with respect to the grievances of the petitioner. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner had earlier represented the matter, however, for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.5. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable could also be paid to the petitioner along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)