IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 20TH DECEMBER 2010 / 29TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 37680 of 2010(H) --------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. AMRITA RAVINDRAN, AGED 19 YEARS, D/O.K.S.RAVINDRAN, RESIDING AT 33/4169A, NAVANEETH, MILLENNIUM ROAD, MALAPARAMBA, KOZHIKODE. 2. PRIYA.M., AGED 19 YEARS, D/O.M.SEKHARAN, RESIDING AT RAM NIVAS, THERUR, POST ELAMPARA, KANNUR. 3. C.K.RAJEENA, AGED 19 YEARS, D/O.E.K.ABDULLA, RESIDING AT RUBEENA'S MAHAL, P.O.PURAMERI, VATAKARA. BY ADVS. SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN, SRI.P.A.HARISH. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, TENHIPALAM, POST CALICUT UNIVERSITY, MALAPPURAM-673 635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, TENHIPALAM, POST CALICUT UNIVERSITY, MALAPPURAM-673 635. R1 & R2 BY SRI. P.C. SASIDHARAN, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 37680 of 2010 H ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 20th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners submit that they appeared for B.Tech 1st, 2nd and 3rd semester examinations and failed in some papers. They submitted applications for revaluation and filed this writ petition seeking an order for expeditious revaluation and declaration of their results. 2. I heard standing counsel appearing for the University also. 3. Having regard to the facts pointed out, it is directed that the University shall complete the revaluation sought for and declare the result of the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within ten weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, provided the applications have been received and are otherwise in order. 4. It is stated that petitioners had also made applications for obtaining Xerox copy of the answer scripts W.P.(C) No.37680/10 : 2 : and that the receipt of the applications have been acknowledged by Exts.P3 and P8. If such applications are received, it is directed that the respondents will take action thereon, immediately after the revaluation process is over. 5. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment along with the writ petition before the University for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge