1N THE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAsggg WRII EEImQN N01; A Zgrw mos, .x’Kashiram Shakya S/o §Ei DhannaiaL, Cast-SE, aged abeut 47§r§s U‘DC. (Eggd- of Sscondary Education Raipur) Fennawnt Address — b—éo, New Ashd‘m Gader' Bhdpal (M? 1 Pin—462023, Present Address - HNd—li. Campus Board of Sgcegdaw . , Educatinn w v - i’engian - Bada Raipur (CG) BEIEIQNEB “A, ‘r \*""; VERSUS /Union of India thorough Secretary DsptL Df Farsemlei £5 "framing, Gevt. QfTm‘ia N— I Delhi . State of Chhattisgarh through sacratary Chhattisgarn Hihger Secondary Board DES Bhavar: Raipur C‘G. .v-Stafe of Madhya l’radesh thraugh Segrgrqrv . d A _..-J ‘M “LU. P Higher hvrr“ Secnmiarv dwhrddl Board Va‘hhha B awed}? Bhopa‘ (MP) .NDENTS . UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF \ LI\IDEA LN TEE NATURE OF r‘vLAN PETITION , " 1 THE D law. XI-HC-22 3am, mug, £m ’W (,J. ? 2'7 mm . ...............................W ............................. mam WW mmmw WW 7-4—2005 On a mention being madey the case is taken up for hearing. Mrs, Hamida Siddique, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Beriwai, Senio‘r Panel Counsel for the Union of India/ respondent No.1. Heard. The case oi the petitione is that he is Working as U.D.C. at Raipur in /; Chhattisgarh Higher Secondary Board. and at the time of reorganisatien of ":/_:,_~ the State, he gave option for the his of Madhya Pradesh.’ Learned counsei far the etitioner submits that ignoring the option of the petitioner he has been alioc ted to the State of Chhattisgarh, and being a iow paid empioyee it is difficult or the petitioner'to maintain his family at two places,“ as such. in the interes of justice, the petitioner may be allowed to make a representation to the U ion of india through the Chhattisgarh Higher $econdaiy Board and also the adhya Pradesh Higher Secondary Board, to which learned counsel for the r pendent has no objection. The limited prayer made y learned counsel for the petitioner appears to be genuine, fair and reason ble. Therefore, the petitioner is ailowed to make a representation to respo dent No.1 through the Chhattisgarh Higher r Secondary Board and Madhya Pradesh Higher Secondary Boardi Bhopai, within a period of 15 days from oday, and on receiving the representation of the petitioner the respondents viz., both the Boards after considering the representation of the petitione shalt forward their views/comments to the Union of lndia within three months from the date of receipt of the representation from the petition r, and in tum, the Union of lndia shah decide the same within a period of an ther six months thereof, in accordance with? Wm m W‘ Ww‘?%7 7g E 200B W m w , mm m 11% mswatm _ ‘ 1’ - WW 35 tmwh‘ W £f aniwr f€Q°rWK With the ditection aforesaid. the petition stands dispased of. \i} Consequently, lA.Nos.1 (1657/2003 and 1 1 141/2003 aisa stand disposed of. ‘ Parties are entitled for cert? ied copy of this crder. Sdl- L.c.BHAD°° Judge