IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application(C482) No. 723 of 2011 Ramesh Chandra, S/o Late Hansraj Office Assistant-2, Electricity Distribution Division, Uttarakhand Power Corporation Jwalapur, Haridwar ………..…Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand, through Secretary (Home) Dehradun 2. Station House Officer, P.S. Jwalapur District Haridwar 3. Sanjeev Bansal Accountant, Revenue Electricity Distribution Division Mayapur Haridwar District Haridwar 4. Deepak Saini, Sub Divisional Officer, Electricity Distribution Sub Division Jwalapur P.S. Jwalapur, District Haridwar 5. Saurabh Chamoli, Sub Divisional Officer I Jwalapur P.S.Jwalapur, District Haridwar 6. Subhah Chandra Tyagi, Executive Engineer Electricity Distribution Division Township Industrial Area Haridwar P.S. Haridwar 7. Sunil Kumar Gautam, Assistant Engineer, Revenue Electricity Distribution Division Mayapur Haridwar District Haridwar 8. Deepak Verma, Assistant Accountant Electricity Distribution Sub Division Jwalapur P.S. Jwalapur District Haridwar 9. Ram Gopal,Ex-Head Cashier, R/o Bangali Hospital Road, Kankhal, P.S. Kankhal, District Haridwar 10. A.K. Gupta, Assistant Engineer, Ex Officer Electricity Distribution Division Mayapur Haridwar 11. Vikramjeet Singh Yadav, Ex Accountant Electricity 2 Distribution Division Mayapur Haridwar District Haridwar ....……Respondents Shri Gopal Narian, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Shri M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, present for the State. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard. 2. By means of this petition moved under section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short Cr.P.C.), the petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 03.02.2011, passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar, whereby the application of the petitioner moved under section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., is rejected. The petitioner has further challenged order dated 20.05.2011, passed by Sessions Judge, Haridwar, whereby criminal revision no. 56 of 2011, was dismissed, and the order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar, was affirmed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Magistrate as well as the revisional court have erred in law in not directing the police to register the case on the application moved by the petitioner under section 156 (3) Cr.P.C.. 3 4. Admittedly the petitioner is an employee of Power Corporation who is placed under the suspension in connection with financial irregularities, and alleged embezzlement. The accused (respondent no. 3 to 11), against whom the petitioner wants to get registered the case are Superior Officers of Uttarakhand Power Corporation. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, in his order dated 03.02.2011, has discussed detailed reasons for which the application was rejected. The allegation against the petitioner is that he is facing department enquiry for not depositing of ` 29,47,542/- collected by him which was later deposited (by him). However, he has taken plea in defence that he had already made the payment of said amount to one Sanjeev Bansal. The Magistrate called report from the police station, and it was reported that the Chief Cashier and Sub Divisional Officer disclosed that the receipts which were relied by the petitioner Ramesh Chandra relating to payment to Sanjeev Bansal, were forged one, and he had to make the payment as above. 5. Having gone through the impugned orders passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar, and Sessions Judge, Haridwar, this Court does not 4 find any illegality committed by the courts below. 6. Therefore, the petition under section 482 Cr.P.C., is dismissed summarily. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Parul 10.08.2011