1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER (1) S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7543/2007 Capital Transformers Pvt.Ltd. Versus Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. & anr. (2) S.B. CIVIL REVIEW PETITION NO.139/2007 Capital Transformers Pvt.Ltd. Versus Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. & anr. Date of order ::: February 10,2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PREM SHANKER ASOPA Mr.Suresh Denwal on behalf of Mr.Praveen Balwada, for the petitioner Mr.Virendra Lodha, for the respondents Heard learned counsel for the parties on the writ petition and the review petition arising out of the interim order dated 23.10.2007. In this case, statement of Mr.Virendra Lodha was recorded on 2.2.2009 to the effect that “contract was executed and the material has also been supplied, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous”. Counsel for the writ petitioner was given time to seek instructions and the case was fixed for 5.2.2009. Counsel for the writ petitioner submits that no instructions have been 2 received by him. In view of the above, relying on the statement of Mr.Lodha that the contract has been executed and the material has been supplied, I dismiss the writ petition and the review petition as having become infructuous. However,it will be open to the writ petitioner, in case the facts are otherwise, to move an application for revival of the writ petition and in that case, the review petition will also stand revived. The writ petition and the review petition both are dismissed as indicated above. (PREM SHANKER ASOPA) J. गोपाल