THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Civil Revision Petition No.6199 of 2009 ORDER: This civil revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order dated 28.10.2009 passed by the learned Additional Junior Civil Judge, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District, dismissing the petition in I.A.No.831 of 2009 in O.S.No.479 of 2009 filed by the petitioners herein, defendants in the suit, praying to reject the suit. Respondents herein filed the aforesaid suit, seeking to declare the registered sale deeds bearing document Nos.7827/88, 8839/88, 7826/88, 9028/88, 7828/88, 9245/88, 8192/89 and 534/89 executed in favour of the defendants, petitioners herein, as null and void, and for cancellation of the said sale deeds in respect of the suit schedule property to an extent of Ac.10.07 gts. in Sy.No.222 situated at Gaganpahad Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The present petition is filed by the defendants, praying the Court below to reject the plaint on two grounds namely 1) the plaintiffs are seeking cancellation of sale deeds and as such Section 24 (d) of the A.P. Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act is not applicable and that while seeking the relief of cancellation of sale deeds, market value of the property has to be taken into consideration for valuing the suit and 2) the plaintiffs seek cancellation of eight sale deeds and when the cause of action is separate in respect of each sale deed, payment of single set of Court Fee is improper. Respondents-plaintiffs resisted the petition by filing counter. The trial Court, after detailed consideration of the matter, dismissed the petition, by the order under revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the impugned order and other material made available on record. Though the petitioners-defendants contend that the suit is not properly valued and that as the plaintiffs are seeking the relief of cancellation of sale deeds, the provisions of Section 24 (d) of the A.P. Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act are not applicable, the fact remains the plaintiffs are not parties to the sale deeds in question and, thus, they need not seek cancellation of the said sale deeds, and even if a prayer to that effect is made, they need not pay the Court Fees, as held by this Court in Mohd. Ikramuddin v. Sangram Bosle and others[1], and, in fact, basing on this judgment, the suit was registered initially. So far as the other contention of the defendants that as the plaintiffs are seeking to cancel eight sale deeds and the cause of action in respect of each of them is separate, payment of single set of Court Fee is not proper, is concerned, it is to be noted that the plaintiffs valued the transactions separately and paid the aggregate amount and it is their case that the root cause for seeking cancellation of all the eight sale deeds is one and the same. The trial Court, taking note of all the above facts, held that the aspect of cause of action can, however, be gone into after full-pledged trial. In the circumstances, I am of the considered opinion that the trial Court has not committed any error warranting interference of this Court, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The civil revision petition is devoid of merit and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 16th June 2010 IBL [1] 2007 (5) ALD 863