1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 5677/2006 Prakash Tatyaba Bansod ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra, thr. its Secretary, Forest Department and Others. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Khandalkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kothari, A.G.P.for respondent nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Badar, Advocate for respondent nos. 5 and 6. Mr. Vaidya, Advocate for respondent no. 7. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA & C. L. PANGARKAR, JJ. DATED : 31 st July, 2008 Considering the application/representation made, the concerned respondents have already taken action that is reflected in the reply dated 06.06.2007 filed by respondent no. 2 in para 2 and 4, which is as under:- “2. ...The talathi as well as Sarpanch Gram Panchayat has not reported the same well in time as result of which the entry on the record of Gaon-Namuna XII in pere- patrak was entered without any proper procedure. It is submitted that the departmental action has been against the said Talathi by issuing show cause notice. 4. It is submitted that after receipt of the report from the petitioner in the year 2006, the detail inquiry has been 2 conducted by the answering respondent and an appropriate action has been initiated against responsible officer in accordance with law.” In view of this, we are of the view that there is nothing survives in this petition. The same is, therefore, disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE kahale