IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 5397of 2010. Decided on: 7th October, 2010. Leela Bhardwaj. .….. Petitioner. Versus HP State Coop. Bank Ltd. & others. …. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “(i) That Annexure P-1 and P-2 may kindly be quashed and set aside and the respondents may be directed to consider the proposal of the petitioner for repayment of the loan in accordance with proposal as sent to the respondents.” 2. Though the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondents has contended that the writ petition is not maintainable at this stage, in view of the apparent willingness of the petitioner to settle the disputes of re-scheduling the repayment of loan amount, we are of the view that the petitioner be given a reasonable opportunity. Therefore, we dispose of the writ petition as follows: 3. The writ petitioner may present himself before the second respondent on 27th October, 2010 at 11.00 AM and 2 submit his proposal regarding the repayment, in which event the second respondent will consider the proposal and take appropriate action thereon. We make it clear that the petitioner shall be entitled to the above relief only in case he deposits an amount of ` 5 lacs, as directed by this Court on 3rd September, 2010 on or before 27th October, 2010. We also make it clear that we are not adverting to the other contentions taken by the parties and all those contentions are left open. 4. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 7th October, 2010 (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (tr) Judge.