IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 390 (M/B) 2002 Ashok Kumar ………………... Petitioner Versus State of Uttaranchal, And others ………………… Respondents. Mr. Sudhir Singh Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. K.P. Upadhayaya for the State. Coram: Hon. S.H. Kapadia, C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. Dated: 08.09.2003: PC: The petitioner claims the benefit of the Government order dated 07.07.2001. Under this Government Order, the claimants are entitled for compensation us and by way of additional rehabilitation grant depending on category of shops which are demolished. Till today, petitioner has not made any claim as to in which category he claims compensation. Therefore, the petition is rejected with liberty to file fresh petition after making a claim before the competent authority. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) (S.H.Kapadia, C.J.) AK.