IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. RSA 2474 of 2000(O&M) Date of decision:4.2.2011 Ashok Kumar Gupta Appellant vs. Jainendra Gurukul Respondent Present: Ms. Nidhi, Advocate for Mr. SS Behl, Advocate. Mr. Vikvek Suri, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. Learned counsel for plaintiff-respondent has made a statement that the plaintiff wants to withdraw the suit as he has already obtained a decree from the court of Rent Controller, which he intends to execute. On account of the interim order passed in the case, the plaintiff- respondent has not been able to execute the decree. The first appeal and the present second appeal has arisen out of the suit filed by the plaintiff- respondent. On the basis of the statement made at bar by the counsel for the plaintiff- respondent, the plaintiff is permitted to withdraw the suit. The eviction order obtained by the plaintiff- respondent becomes null and void. The instant appeal has become infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. February 4 ,2011 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE