IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 17th day of February, 2010 Ist Bail Application No. 166 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Aryan Tyagi @ Pravin Tyagi .…. Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No 498 of 2009, U/s 420 IPC, PS Kotwali, Dehradun. _______________________________________________________________ February 17, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for the accused applicant and Mr. GS Sandhu, GA for the State. Learned Counsel for the applicant accused submitted that the accused applicant is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further argued that the disputed 20 mobile phones have already been recovered by the police, but nothing has been recovered from the possession of the accused applicant. He further argued that the FIR was lodged when the applicant accused asked the complainant to deposit the required fee. He also submitted that the accused applicant has got no previous criminal history, who is in jail since 24.12.2009. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record and in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Aryan Tyagi @ Pravin Tyagi be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties each in like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Dehradun. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 17.2.2010 PRABODH 2