1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.63 OF 2008 Shankar Annappa Gadave .. Petitioner Versus Datta Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.M.S.Topkar for petitioner Mr.V.B.Rajure for respondent No.1 Mr.P.S.Dani for respondent No.2 Mr.A.I.Patel, AGP for respondent No.3. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 27th April 2010. P.C.: 1] Heard Mr.Topkar for petitioner. 2] The narration of facts by Mr.Topkar leading to the filing of independent proceedings alleging part implementation of the order of the Courts below is enough to dismiss this petition. Once, the petitioner has availed all remedies to assert his rights and to claim substantive reliefs, then, the contempt petition was surely not his remedy. The petition is misconceived and is dismissed accordingly. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)