• - • * IN THE .HIGH COURT OF DELID AT NEW DELHI 0 30 + W.P.(C) 12558/2009 & CM APPL No. 13102/2009 NANDAN SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Malhotra, Advocate versus ," UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER ..... Respondents Through: Mr. l.S. Kohli, proxy counsel for Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate for DOL Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for R-2. And dV > -1. + W.P.(C) 12560/2009 & CM APPL No. 13105/2009, 15401/09 RAMA DEEP AK ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Malhotra, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER ..... Respondents Through : Mr. l.S. Kohli, proxy counsel for Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate for DOL Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR ORDER 010 25.03.2010 1. Mr. Rajiv Sharma, learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 states that pursuant to the order dated 22nd October 2009 a fresh show cause notice has Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified • e been issued to the Petitioners and they have also submitted thjePlY, He further states that the Respondent No.2 will, after considering the reply, pass a speaking order within four weeks and a copy of the said order will be communicated to the Petitioners within one week thereafter. 2. In view of the aforesaid ... statement and for the reasons stated in the order dated 22nd July 2009 passed in Rama Pandey v. Union of India & Anr • [w.P. (Civil) 8558 of 2009J, the impugned order dated 15th April 2009 is hereby quashed. It will be open to the Petitioners, if they are still aggrieved thereafter, to seek appropriate remedies that are available to them in law. 3. The petitions and the pending applications are disposed of. 4. Order be given dasti to learned counsel for the parties . . 1 V MARCH 25, 2010 rk S.MURALIDHAR, J.