IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5506 of 2010 SAKIL AHMAD @ PAPPU S/O JAMIL AHMAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 5.5.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 364 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the truck of the informant disappeared with the goods, after the driver was kidnapped for which a case u/s.364 I.P.C. was instituted against unknown persons. During investigation, one Sanjay Yadav was arrested on suspicion, who confessed that the stolen tyres could be pointed out by him so on his and the pointing out 86 tyres were recovered from the shop of Jitesh, but seizure list witnesses stated that the petitioner was one of the persons, who had got the tyres kept from where it was recovered. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the serious nature of the offence. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )