1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 56. CA/354/2010 In FAST/28557/2009 WITH CA/355/2010 In FAST/28557/2009 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. A.G.Kulkarni, Adv., for the applicant. Smt.Madhubala B.Gangwal, Adv., for respondent nos. 1 and 2. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:11-2-2010 P.C.:- 1. Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2 have filed affidavit-in- reply opposing the petition for condonation of delay. 2. Heard. The controversy centers to the decree in favour of parents against the son. The son (appellant) has requested to condone delay of 151 days canvassing, he had suffered acid - peptic disease supported with medical certificate and also he met with an accident, there was 2 fracture of femur, he was hospitalized from 9.7.2009, directed rest for three months. He has also urged, to make financial pursuits, he had killed some time. 3. Considering nature of controversy, the delay of 151 days is not so exorbitant, which is sufficiently explained. Application allowed. Delay condoned. Heard. Counsel appearing for respondent nos. 1 and 2 ( Parents) waives service in the appeal and also stay petition. Mr.Kulkarni, Counsel has served the papers of appeal and also Civil Application for stay. S.O., after registration, to 19th March, 2010. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/354-10ca