%<^ ^s HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAiffiH AT MLASFUR PETITIONER RE8PONDENTS WrttPe<t(mn<QJ^^861of2W7 Nand Kumar Dewangan^ aged about 47 years S/o Mancdiar Lal DewaMgaci R/o Dewangan Mohalla Rani RoadWardN6.^^(3hainpaTahsiiehan)pa District Janjgi-Champa {C!0)^ VERSU8 ..:•-' 1. State of Chhattisgaifa Ihrou^i the Secretary Depattment of Home, DKS Bhawan, Raipitt CCG). ,' - ^: 1.^ • 2. Superintendeut ofPolice, Janjgr Champa Disteict JaajgirC3ianq)a(CG). 3. Station House Qfficer Police Station Champa District Janjgir Champa (CG). 4. Dr. Kurunji VerikataTaman Gowda KVG Medical CoUege and Hospital Sulia (South Kamataka) Pin 574327. • ' \. -":: ,.;'' ^ 1 • • (WMT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OE 3HE GONSTn'UTION OF INDIA) (SB: HunTrfeMr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Presetrt : Sfari Vishnu Koshta, Advocate forthe petitioner,. Shri Sumssh Bajaj, Govt Advocate fartheState. ' ORALQROEK (Passed onflus 17th ofNovember, 20U7) 1. The petitioner has filed this petition complauiing that resptmdent No. 2 & 3 are not registering offence agamstthe respondait No. 4 despste a written ccmiplaint dated 10.08.2007 kxlged wittrtfa^Bolice Statkn Oiampa. • 2. I do not find any reason to CTtertain this petitioa on tfae simple grpund Ihat Seetion 154 (3) of The Code af Crimmal i'rocedure, 1973 (hereinffler refered to as "Cr.P.C.") CleaTly provides Ifaat iti tite event, tte ofBcer- in-chafge ofthe police stati<wi refases to record Ifae First Information Report, the petitioaer may send the conqtlaint to the Suparintendeat of Polieeconeemed, by post. Even, thereaffier, tf poliee fails to take any action, the petitioner cantaKe recourse to prowsions of Section 190 & 200 ofCr.P.C. 3. In viewofferegoing, it appears thattlie pirtitibner has approaehedthe Poliee Station for lodging a reporton 10.08.2007, thereafter,thepetitioner has Saim senta letter dated 20.09.2007 to Ifae Superintendent of Police, as well as to the Station House OflBeer Champa, but notfaing has been done. 4. The petitioner ean take recourse to other fwums srfuch are available under provisions ofCr.P.C. 5. In viewoftfae foregoing, this petition is dismissed. NOQrder asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge