1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4544 OF 2008 M/s.N.I.Plast India .Applicant V/s. M/s.Multimedia Enterprises & anr. .Respondents Mr.S.V.Pitre, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP, for Respondent No.2 - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 23RD NOVEMBER, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is an application for leave to file an appeal against Judgment of acquittal for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Magistrate held in favour of the applicant on all points except that the applicant did not have authority to prosecute the complainant on behalf of complainant  firm. The learned 2 counsel for the applicant points out that the applicant who prosecuted the complainant was a partner of the firm and being partner he was agent of all other partners and had capacity to represent the firm without any further authority. Leave granted. 3. Admit. 4. Call for R & P. 5. Action under Section 390. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)