: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.59 OF 2006 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.59 OF 2006 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.59 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.61 OF 2006 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.61 OF 2006 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.61 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICAION NO.62 OF 2006 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICAION NO.62 OF 2006 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICAION NO.62 OF 2006 Ashok C. Mehta ...Applicant. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. Shri B.M.Shaikh holding for Mr.Palve, advs. for the Applicant. Mrs.M.H.Mhatre, APP for the Respondent No.1/State. Mr.S.V.Vora, adv. for the Respondent No.2. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 20th February, 2007. DATE : 20th February, 2007. DATE : 20th February, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr.B.M.Shaikh holding for Mr.Palve, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.S.V.Vora, the learned counsel for the respondent no.2, who is the original complainant. 2. Mr.Vora makes a statement that respondent no.2, who is the original complainant, has already received a full amount as per the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are marked Exhibit ’X’ and therefore, revision application may be allowed in terms of the said Consent Terms. : 2 : 3. In view of the compromise between the parties in terms of the minutes of the order marked ’X’, revision application is allowed and the impugned order of conviction in Criminal Case No.310/S/ of 2002 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate 21st Court, Bandra and maintained by the Sessions Court is hereby set aside. 4. The Revision Applications stand disposed off accordingly. (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.)