HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR ($) Writ Petition (Art. 227) No.2528 of 2009 PETITIONER/: (Plaintiff) RESPONDENTS/: (Defendants) Smt. Sonmet Bai Wife of Bhola Ram (Dhola Ram) aged about 35 years, Caste Rajwar, Resident of Village Manjira, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja Versus 1. Budhan Ram (Chullu) Son of Raghunath, aged about40 years; 2. Soni Wife of Anand Ram, aged about 28 years; 3. Anand Ram Son of Dalsai, aged about 52 years; 4. JalinderSon of Nan Sai, aged about 35 years; 5. Beersai Son ofJugan Ram, aged about 42 years; 6. Nan Sai Son of Kaliram, aged about 72 years; 7. Bhera (Mahaveer) Son of Kaliram, aged about 75 years; All are residents of Village Manjira, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). {Writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India} Present: Mr. Sunil Tripathi, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Kumar Shukla, counsel for the respondents. SinQle Bench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J ORDER (19-9-2011) 1. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the "petitioner has challenged legality and propriety of the order dated 23-4- 2009 passed by the 1 Additional District Judge, Surajpur in Misc. Civil , Appeal No.5/2007, whereby while reversing the order granting injunction, the lower appellate Court has providing opportunity of filing application afresh after complying the directions. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the order impugned. 3. On due consideration, 1 do not find any illegality in the order impugned, especially providing opportunity after complying the directions. Consequently, the petition is dismiss&d.._ order as to costs. Soma Sd/- T.P Sharma Judge