MST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5065 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1235 OF 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, Court’s or appearances, Court’s Judge’s order orders or directions & Registrar’s orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mr.T.S.Ingale for applicant. Mr.Umesh Mankapure for R.1 and 2. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 09th March 2007 PC : 1. Heard learned advocates for petitioner and respondent nos.1 and 2. The prayer for restoration of the writ petition is opposed by Shri Mankapure. 2. Considering the averments made in the application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). As there was no ad-interim relief operating in favour of the applicant, there is no question of restoring the ad-interim relief. (A.S.qOKA, J.)