1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7490 OF 2005 Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Union ..Petitioner. Vs. Pune District Security Guards Board & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Ms.Ranjana Todankar i/b Mr.S.S.Pakale for the Petitioner. Ms.Pallavi Divekar for Respondent No.1. Mr.K.S.Bapat with Mr.A.H.Fatangare for Respondent No.2. Mr.Neel Helekar for Respondent No.3. .... CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : F.I.REBELLO, J. AND F.I.REBELLO, J. AND F.I.REBELLO, J. AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. J. J. 21st February, 2006. P.C. : 2 Rule. Heard forthwith. This is a Petition on behalf of the security guards for the reliefs as sought. Counsel appearing for the Petitioner points out that the Board has initiated action in so far as prayer clause (a) is concerned. Once that be the case, nothing further survives as far as that prayer is concerned. In so far as prayer clause (b) is concerned, the security guards have made an application for registration. The Board to consider the same and dispose of the same within eight weeks from today. In so far as prayer clause (c) is concerned, Respondent No.2 the principal employer has already applied for registration. The Board to consider the same and take a decision within eight weeks from today. Rule made absolute accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)