IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.534 of 2009 PUSHPA DEVI W/O LATE SIDHESHWAR PASWAN --- PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. CHANDRADEV YADAV S/O LATE DEV CHARAN YADAV 3. NIRMALA DEVI W/O VINAY YADAV ---- OPP. PARTIES. ----------- 02 08.11.2010 Petitioner is the informant. He assails the order dated 20.01.2009 whereby on a consideration of the documents filed along with charge sheet cognizance has been taken but processes have been issued only against two named accused persons. With regard to two other accused persons (opposite party no. 2 and 3) processes were not directed to be issued since in the opinion of the Investigating Officer they were innocent. This order was passed on 20.01.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that during the pendency of the application the case has already been committed to the Court of Sessions whereby the trial has commenced. In that view of the matter, petitioner may invoke Court’s jurisdiction conferred under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, if the circumstances so warrant/justify. The application is disposed of. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)