WW CWRT OF CHHATTES&WH AT KCLASPUR W. P.fSl No. 2643 of 2007 Petitioneps Versus R^ionden-ts 1. BalbhddFO Singh Chfflidrokar- Aged titmff 49 Yeaps;^S/o.5hRi Prat^) Singh Chandrakar/ Assistant Tecicher, Primory School Khamdodgi 2. Bhwneshww Lal joan Ageel obout 42 years, SM Siri yadav R<rt jajn Assistant Teacher, Primary SchoolPetoli, 3. Oine^ l^ Swy/w Aged about 43 Ye<rs, S/o. Shri Pandit R<an fiongver" AssistuTt Teacher, Rrimary Schoot fad<gaon 4. Smt. Pushplato Jain Aged obout 41 yedrs, W/o. Shi-i B.L. Tam Assistart Teacher, Primary Schbol MuKlarwiil, All are flrt- Bloek Kaikep, Oistt. Kanker(C.©^ 1. StateotChhcrt-tisgorh.'Through SecrefaiSy, :Seh^t ^BcUjcation t>epdrtment; D.K.5; Bhauwan, Raipur(C.6.) 2. The Oirector' Public Instruetion Department Raipur (G^.) 3. &istrictEduc<ri'onOfficer Kunkec District Kmter (C.S.) 4. Block Educatlon Officer Kanker •'•(^):'::"11:.::'1. '^ 5. Treasui'y i& Funds&epat'tment Konker^.6.) WFitPetitibnunderArticleZZfiofthe Cons'lili.itioi'ke^Saclia SB!frtorrt?leShri3"usficeSattsh K. ^gnihotri. Present: Mr-i^. TBpiq yditlBf^;i8i()vocate^r1^ Ms.Sumts^^^m^tMiyW^W^^o^e/fVspondent&^ OROER (Possedon-Hiis 2'111 Oay of Moy.ZOOT) 1. The question of l<a» involved herein is asto whether the petitioners are entitled to regular poy scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date ofcompletion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appea'ing for the petitioners os well as for the State/respondents jointly submit th<rt the facts and question of law involved in the ppesent writ petition are the same as to that of in W.P- (S)No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. State ©overnment of Chhottjsgarh <SiotheFS), which was allowed vide ordep dated 7.11.2M6. SiAhash 3. In view of the above-stoted submissions made by teapned counset for -the parties; tiie writ petition is;allowed in the same terms. No order<B to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge