IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR : PRESENT: THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE : G.YETHIRAJULU CONTEMPT CASE NO. 337 of 2004 (Contempt Case Under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondents herein for willfully disobedience of the Order of the High Court passed in W.P. NO. 5043 of 1995 dated: 21-03-2003) Between: Chowdary Appala Naidu, S/o Sanyasi Appadu, R/o Amudalvalasa, Srikakulam dist. ..... Petitioner AND 1. Sri S. Dharma Raaju, District Educational Officer, Srikakulam District. 2. Sri P. Raghava Charyalu, The Manager & Correspondent of G.D.A.A.U.P. School, Amudalavaalasa, Srikakulam dist. .....Respondents The Contempt Case coming on for hearing upon perusing the Case and affidavit filed herein and the orders of the High Court dated: 16-03-2004 & 28- 09-2004 and made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. Y.V. Ravi Prasad, Advocate for the petitioner and G.P For School Education, for the respondents 1 & 2, the Court made the following ORDER: “ The learned counsel for the 1st respondent represented that the sanction order has been given by the 1st respondent for the release of the amount due to the petitioner and the bills for the said amount have been passed by the Gazetted Administrative Officer of the 1st respondent and handed over to the 2nd respondent on 07-09-2004. The learned counsel for the 1st respondent is not in a position to say as to when the correspondent presented the bills to the Treasury, and whether the bills are passed as on today. The learned counsel is directed to get the information from the 1st respondent whether the bill was passed by the Treasury and whether the amount was paid to the petitioner. If there is no proper follow up action from the 1st respondent, he would be directed to make his appearance personally, and to explain the cause for the delay. The 2nd respondent is also directed to process the bill immediately and arrange payment of the amount to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, failing which, further orders will be passed according the material available on record. Post after 10 days in the ‘motion list’.” DEPUTY REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2 To 1. Sri S. Dharma Raaju, District Educational Officer, Srikakulam District. 2. Sri P. Raghava Charyalu, The Manager & Correspondent of G.D.A.A.U.P. School, Amudalavaalasa, Srikakulam District. (Addressees 1 & 2 By Speed Post with a copy of petition and affidavit) 3. Two CCs to the G.P. for School Education, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT) 4. One spare copy. USR. HIGH COURT DR GYRJ DATE: 25-10-2004 Note : Post after 10 days in the ‘motion list’ ORDER C.C. No. 337 of 2004 DIRECTION HIGH COURT USR Date of drafting: 25-10-2004 DR GYRJ DATE: 25-10-2004 Note : Post after 10 days in the ‘motion list’ ORDER C.C. No. 337 of 2004 DIRECTION