1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3334 OF 2010 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL ST.NO.6055 OF 2010 Mahavir Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit through Manager .. Applicant Versus Prakash Amrutlal Changedia and ors. ..Respondents Mr.A.B.Kale, Advocate for applicant Mr.C.R.Thorat, Advocate for respondent No.1-Caveator Mr.S.K.Kadam, A.G.P.for respondents 2 to 4 CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND N.D.DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 6th July 2010 PER COURT : 1. By this application, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 118 days in filing letters patent appeal. We have heard learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr.Thorat, learned Counsel on behalf of respondent No. 1 – Caveator. None appears on behalf of the other respondents though duly served. Learned Counsel for respondent No.1 has strongly objected to the condonation of delay on the ground that the delay has not been satisfactorily explained. 2. By referring to the contents of the application, according to us, the applicant has satisfactorily explained the delay. Accordingly, this civil application is allowed, delay is condoned with no order as to costs. ( N.D.DESHPANDE, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) (vvr/3334.10ca) 2