IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU C.R.P.No.3302 OF 2009 Date:09.02.2011 Between:- Tapal Syam Prasad ..Petitioner And The Director of Mines and Geology, Government of A.P., Hyderabad and another .. Respondents ORDER:- The Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order, dated 09-07-2009, in I.A.No.9 of 2009 in O.S.No.17 of 2007 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Anantapur, whereunder and whereby, the petition filed under Order XVIII Rule 18 C.P.C. praying the Court to make personal inspection of the plaint schedule land was dismissed. 2. Heard. 3. The object of Order XVIII Rule 18 of C.P.C. relating to local inspection is to enable the Court to understand the questions being raised and to appreciate evidence led by the parties keeping in view the position of property or thing in dispute. 4. The petitioner herein is the plaintiff. The suit is filed for mere permanent injunction restraining the respondents/defendants and their men from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule land. No reason is assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition as to for what purpose the inspection of the plaint schedule land by the Court is sought for. As seen from the affidavit allegations, the purpose is to find out whether iron ore was stored in the plaint schedule land or not. For the purpose of collecting evidence or for proving a particular fact, a party cannot make a request to the Court for inspection. Foundation of the case on that aspect must be based upon the evidence that may be adduced by plaintiff. Therefore, the trial Court rightly dismissed the petition and that order needs no interference by this Court. 5. The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _​_____________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU 9th February, 2011 AMD