IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5950 of 2011 SHASHI RANJAN KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.3.2011 The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. on account of being suspected to have killed the deceased who was the sister of the informant who had gone to attend the call of nature but subsequently not coming back and a hunt for her was made and her dead body was found hanging from a bamboo plant. While rejecting the prayer for bail of the petitioner, the learned trial Judge has written these two lines as under: “The petitioner is named accused in the F.I.R. and investigation of the case has not been concluded as yet. Therefore, some more evidence is expected to come against the petitioner.” Thus, what appears is that the learned Judge not getting anything which could be material for refusing the prayer was simply looking to the future as regards the material which was completely unknown to the justicing system. Let the petitioner, Shashi Ranjan Kumar Singh be directed to be released on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in Jandaha P.S.Case No. 142 of 2010. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)