IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 11288 of 2008. Decided on: 24.12.2010. Sushil Kumar. ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner. : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma,Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.K.Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Petitioner was engaged on daily wage basis in the month of September, 1989. He had worked continuously for 10 years with 240 days in each calendar year. The case of the petitioner instead of being considered for regularization after 10 years of continuous service has been considered for work charge status on December 7th, 2002. Since the petitioner has been working before 31.12.1993, his case was required to be considered for conferment of work charge status immediately after completion of 10 years of service with 240 days in each calendar year. 2. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. No. conferment of work charge status from August, 1999, instead of 7th December, 2002, with all consequential benefits. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) December 24, 2010. Judge (krt)