1N THE HIGH COURT 0F: CHHATTI$GARH AT BILASPUR (“Mam QI \ H o o$Sh 3 Pr Sco Coha Tah st ilaspu G VERSUS n fri Pefn i‘ng O‘en‘) ged anw r Sh nt a al 4 r, hiksh ri a— 1 yeas Sa Kam Grde , imary hol Barjhorkitola (hichgn),. sil Marwahi, Dirict Br (C..) yChajnrapal ntn 'd Oe . /. 1. lSt o hhattisah, hh i he set Dpmt of , Mai, D.K.. ai Riui‘ (..). nad nha Mrwahi, hh: Th Chif m. ficer, Marwhi, istric Bilaspu ..). T ion t Pcl d, Diict lasr (.. ' srict daton f‘ Eion Dstric Bila .. he Zila Panhayat Bilasur u: The hief Eti'il Cer, Zla Panchat ilaspu (CG-)- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22/6/227 OF THE CliONSTITUTION ,OWF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE‘ NATURE 9F ‘‘ IER'IIORARI MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR TAPPROPRIAIT‘ Z’ ' ' O WRIT PETITION NQLQ9T/2o‘os I 1 1 EETITIONER RE§PON DENTS iaTte f CPQr j; iTroug: T 7V jii ii creary earten i atlorl antraya S Bhawi aij CG Jap Pagyat a Troug e e lEEwhi Of a Dt r (CG he Addtial Collecor, ;enm Roa str Bip‘u C.G) The Dit Eudi lGfhilzw ducat it spur (CG). T c p, Throgh C iuisi Offi i ay Bi RDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. r HtGH couRT 05 aHHAm§LmH AT BaLASPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5387 of 2005 ‘ Chandtapal Oman - Versus R$mndent Statg of Chhamsgarh & othets WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226%7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'ble’Mr. Satish K. Agnihou’i, J.) Preamp smu' Aditya Kumar, Adwocate with “Shari PP. sahg. Advocate for‘the petitioner. ‘ . Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Deputy Government Advocate fer the State. ORDER (0&L) (Passed on 7 Day ofAprII, 201 O) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in this petitioner has aiready been granted by the respondents andaesuch nothing survives for adjudication and this petition has become infructuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the State does not contravert the above submission. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become ,l to ._ Sd/- infructuous. Arun Sadsh K. Agnihou'i J Judge , i