IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 9081 of 2005 Between: 1 Krushi Vidyanikatan Aided Upper Primary School, Rep. by its Correspondetn S. Jalini Basha, S/o. S. Abdul Khalatue, Aged about 52 Years, Allagadda Village & Mandal, Kurnool District. 2 Ravi Partly Aided-Upper Primary School, Rep. by its Correspondent G. Venkata Subbaiah, S/o. G. Venkata Subbaiah, Aged 52 Years, Allagadda Village & Mandal, Kurnool district, 3 Arundathi partly Aided-Upper Primary School, Rep. by its Correspondent Mr. M. Saiman, S/o. M. Danial Aged about 64 Years, Abbipuram Village, mahanandi Manal, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Education (SE-PROG-1) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 The district Collector, Kurnool district, Kurnool. 3 The District Educational Officer, Kurnool district, Kurnool. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Allagadda Mandal, Kurnool district. 5 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool district. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly onein the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS, declaring the action ofthe REspondents 4 and 5 allotting the midday meals programmes to DWCUA, SHG, Podhupu Lakshmi and Parents Committee is sillegal, arbitrary and agains thte G.O.Ms.No. 98, dated 25-11-2002 and reported cased in ALD (6) 2004- Page 157" and consequently direct the 4th and 5th respondents to consider the petitioner No.1 representation dated 11-3-2005 and allot the midday meal program tot he Petitioner School Committee and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.GIRIMOJI RAO Counsel for the Respondent : GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION FOR R6.6.05,APP-1TO5 The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 9081 OF 2005 ORDER When this writ petition came up for hearing on 10-6-2009, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and therefore, it was directed to be listed under the caption ‘ for dismissal’. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘ for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It indicates that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 11th June, 2009. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 9081 OF 2005 11th June, 2009.