1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 929 OF 2011 *** 1. Matter was kept back at the request of Advocate Mr. Rakhunde holding for Advocate Mr. Bhapkar. When the matter is called out again there is no appearance. 2. The petitioner instead of filing appeal under section 30 of Workmen's Compensation Act preferred to approach same Court seeking review. The reason put-forth is, he is residing at place Beed which is far away from Parbhani and, therefore, he could not contact his Advocate. It is also mentioned that he was informed that for filing appeal he is required to deposit amount first. 3. The application for delay has been rightly evaluated by the trial Court. I do not see any jurisdictional error or perversity. Writ petition is, therefore, rejected. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:23/02/2011. ans/929