c\ HIOH COURT OF CHHATnSQARH: BILASPUR Writ Petttlon (Sl No. 2784 of2008 Petttloner Santosh Kumar Sahu, S/o. Jadu ram Sahu, aged about 25 years, posted as Shiteha Karmi, Class flt at the Govt. Primary School, Paraswani, Tahsil & Distt. Mahasamund (CG). Respondents 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Panchayat and Social Wetfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). 2) Director, Panchayat, Raipur, dist. Ralpur (CG). 3) Collector, Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund 4) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Pithora, District Mahasamund (CG). 5) Distrid Education OfRcer, Mahasamund, District MahasamurwJ (CX3). 6) Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat Mahasamund, Dtstt. Mahasamund (CG). (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitijtlon of India) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnih«rtrl,J. Present Shri SunilSahu, counsel for petitioner. Shri Y. S. Thakur, DeputyAdvocate Generai fbrtheState. ORALORDER (Passedon 14th dayofMay, 2008) With consent of learned counset appearing for both the parties, the matter is heard finaily. 2} The petitioner was appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade tll on 25-6-2007 (Annexure P/4) at Government Primary Schoot, Paraswni, Tahsil & Dist. Maha^imund. Atl of a sudden» without affording any opportunity of heartng the appointrnent ofthe petitioner was cancelted on 4-8-^)07 (Annexure P/3) by the Chief Executive OfRcer, Janpsd Panchayat, Pithora, on the basis of some complaint made to the Colteetor, Mahasamund. o IL -2.- 3) Learned counset appearir^ for the petitioner submits that the question of tew asto whether an emptoyee is entitled to show cause notice even to examine the genuinoness of the document, has alreacly been considered by this Court in a batch of matter by Judgment and orderdated 14th March, 2008 in W.P.(S) No. 95/2008 (Ku. Punam & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & othere) and other connectKt matters. This case is squarely covered on the questton of law. 4) Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State submits ttiat so far as the question of iaw is concerned, it has already been considered and dTOhied by this Qourt in the above stated jucfgment. Hov^ver, the State be permitted to vert^ the facte of the same. 5) In view of the foregoing, this petition is altovwd in the ^me terms l.e., the petitioner te afforded an opportunity of hearing to e^ablish genuineness, truthfutness of the documents submitted by him for obtaining appointmwt on the post and to put forv^ird his case before his appointmerrt made eariier.is cancelied: The impugned order dated 20-11-2007 (Annexure P/1), 30-7-2007 (Annexure P/2) and 4-8-2007 (Annexure P/3) in respect of the petitioner shati not be given eftect to, unttl the direction mwtioned hereinatx)ve is canplled with. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge