COCP No. 1092 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1092 of 2010 Date of Decision: 28.6.2010 Sukhwinder Singh alias Dayal Singh …..Petitioner Versus Ram Singh ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Shri Jagdev Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Sahu, AAG, Punjab. HEMANT GUPTA, J (Oral). The petitioner submitted a representation, Annexure P.4, to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala, for enhancing his security cover and also for permission to keep a weapon with him. This Court on 26.3.2010 directed the Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala, to decide such representation within three weeks. An affidavit has been filed by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala, along with copy of letter dated 17.4.2010 as Annexure R.1/A. In the aforesaid communication, the Senior Superintendent, Kapurthala, has communicated to the Registrar of this Court that Head Constable Sukhwinder Singh has been provided as a gunman to the petitioner and that no other gunman is required to be provided to him. COCP No. 1092 of 2010 [2] The threat perceptions and the level of security to be provided to a citizen is to be examined by the police authorities. Since the police has examined the request of the petitioner and has found that enhanced security cover is not required to be given to him, I do not find that the order dated 26.3.2010 has not been complied with in letter and spirit. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. [ HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 28-06-2010 ds