IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4966 of 2010 SANDEEP KUMAR S/O SADANAND YADAV R/O VILLAGE + P.O.- PAIKTOLA, P.S. ARARIA, DISTT.- ARARIA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR-IN-CHIEF HEALTH SERVICES, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE STATE LEPROSY OFFICER HEALTH SERVICES, BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SITAMARHI 6. THE CIVIL SURGEON-CUM-CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER SITAMARHI 7. THE DISTRICT LEPROSY OFFICER SITAMARHI ----------- 02. 04.01.2011 After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the writ application. Counsel for the State has no objection. If the petitioner has remedy available otherwise, he may pursue the same or convince the authorities on their utility and continuance. The writ application is permitted to be withdrawn. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)