HIGILGOGBTQECmiATTISGARHATBILASPUR WMT PETITION (Q No. 2520 of2007 Kanchan, S/o Late Etw,'ari, Aged about 65 years, Casfg'Gond, R/o Village Khusmpali, Post Khusrupali, Thana Tumgaon, Tehsil & District Mahasamund, (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS -; - 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur, (C.G.)' , .' : •- 1. : < 2. The Collector, District Mahasamund, (C.G.) 3. Additional Tehsildar, Bagbahara, DistrictMahasamund,C.G. 4; Naib Tehsildar, Bagbahara, District Mahasamund, C.G. 5. Gram Panchayat Khusrapali, through Tehsil Bagbahara, District Mahasamund C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE^260F THE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA. . : Single Bench : Hon'ble Justice ShriSatish K. Agnihotri, Present: Mr. J.K.Gupta, Advocate forthe petitioner. Miss Deepali Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State / res^orident no. lto4. ^ : -: : ...; 1 : '! 1. •th (P^sedon25uldayofApril,2007) • Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the property in dispute situated at village Khusrupali, beariag.Khasra. No. 238, Area 0.03 Hectare, Patwari Circle No.70, Revenue Circle Khallari, Distriet Maliasatffund, has been demolisfaed witllout 3&^ verifviag the fact as to whether the petitioner is the legal owner of tlie said property or not. 2. ' It appears that the Gram Panchayat Khusrupali has taken action again.st the petitioner on the ground tliat the laad was the villsge Panchayat land and the petitioner has made encroachment. 3. Be that as it may. So far a.s the title ofthe land is concsmed, it cannot be decided by this Court, as it requires recording of evidence and examination of documents. The same can be done by other forom. This petition is not maintainable at this stage. Thus, it is accordingly dismissed. • 4. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to tafce recourse to appropriate foram for proper relief. No order as to costs. Amit -'"N. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge