1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA/1736/2006 IN FAST NO.2222/2006 CA/1737/2006 IN FAST 2249/2006 CA/1738/2006 IN FAST 2247/2006 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders Mrs. R.R.Mane, AGP for the applicant. Mr. D.R.Jaybhar, Adv., for respondent. ... CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: June 11 th, 2009 ... 1.Heard learned AGP and Mr. D.R.Jaybhar, Advocate, for sole respondent. There is delay of 485 days in filing the appeal challenging the order dt.15th March, 2004, passed by the third Ad hoc Additional District Judge, Beed, in the respective Land Acquisition References. Learned AGP submits that the delay is properly explained in paragraph no.2 of the 2 petition. The delay is apparently exorbitant. Learned Reference Court has considered all the pros and cons while making enhancement and putting the amount of enhancement as against acquired property of the individual claimant. Even otherwise, prima facie, the order does not require any interference. The delay being not properly explained, Applications dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/office/ca1736-06