H1GH CQIJRT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WRTf PETmON No. 528 of2002 Nand Kumar Baghel aged about <^ yrs.y s/o Late Sliri Klionmath Ba^iel, r/o vill. Kumdili, Tahsil Pataa, Dist. Durg, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS RE8PONDENT8 : 1. Union of India, throu^i Secretary to the Mmistry ofLaw, Justice aiid Cotiipmiy affairs, Shastri Bhawaii, New Delhi. 2. State of ClAattisgarh, tlirou^i Cliief Secretar^r Department of Home affairs and Law, D.K.Singli Bhawaii,Raipur, C.G. 3. The Station House CffiRcer, Police Statioii Saraswati Nagar, Raipur C.G, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES216^s[D127aFJl|E CONSTlTtTHON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AaEnShofa-i, J, Present: Shri Bhishraa Kmger. Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Goveniiiient Advocate forthe State. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 02nd day of September, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearmg fbr fhe petitionCT, on ms'tmctions. aee^s permission offhis Court to witfadraw this petNon in light of the fact tliat the charge-sheet has already been filed and thus. fhe first relief sought fbr by the petitioner, has been fiilfilled. As far ^ second relief is concemed, fhe Shri Kinger prays fhat liberty may be givein to Ihe petitioner to make a representatiCTi before Ifae appropriate aufhorities for prescribing a time limit m provisions ofsection 167 ofthe Code of Crimmal Procedure, 1973. f 2, Uamed counsel appearing fbr the other side has no objection. 3. In view ofthe above; without expres^ing aay opinion cn merits ofthe case, the petition is dismissed as withdrawa with the above stated liberty. - ^ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^s. Anut