THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3743 of 2010 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies representing the respondents. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a mandamus to declare the inaction of the third respondent – Tahsildar, Rompicherla Mandal, Guntur District, in implementing the order, dated 11.01.2010 passed in Appeal Case No.1811/2009-DT by the second respondent – Revenue Divisional Officer, Narsaraopet, Guntur, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner is a kerosene hawker. On the ground that he has committed certain irregularities, his hawkership was suspended by the third respondent vide proceedings, dated 20.10.2009. Aggrieved by the same, he preferred an appeal before the second respondent, who by his order, dated 11.01.2010 disposed of the appeal directing the third respondent to complete the enquiry within a period of four (4) weeks, after examining the relevant documents. On instructions, it is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies that in view of the remand order passed by the appellate authority i.e. the second respondent herein, the enquiry is being conducted against the petitioner and appropriate decision will be taken. Inasmuch as the appellate authority issued directions to the third respondent vide his order, dated 11.01.2010 to complete the enquiry within a period of four (4) weeks, I deem it appropriate to direct the third respondent to complete the enquiry and pass appropriate order as expeditiously as possible, within a period of four (4) weeks from today. Further, if the enquiry is not completed within the stipulated time, the hawkership of the petitioner shall stand restored and the petitioner shall be supplied kerosene for distribution, till conclusion of enquiry. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 23rd FEBRUARY, 2010. kvni