THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.735 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner alleges that the respondents have flouted the orders, dated 01.04.2011, passed by this Court in W.P.No.8807 of 2011. The interim order is to the effect that the respondents shall not interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the property in question without issuing any notice or proceedings in accordance with law. The affidavit filed in support of the contempt case is silent as to the date on which the respondents are said to have dispossessed the petitioner or to have taken out the machinery. Hence, the contempt case is closed for want of necessary particulars. If the petitioner still feels that any contempt was committed by the respondents, it shall be open to him to file a contempt case with necessary particulars. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:01.08.2011 kdl