IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.196/2006 Geeg Raj S/o Shri Ramdev ...plaintiff-appellant Versus Sumer Singh S/o Dhokal Singh ...defendant-respondent Date of Order ::: 05.10.2006 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri A.L. Verma, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the plaintiff- appellant. The plaintiff-appellant filed a suit for dispossession and permanent injunction, which was dismissed by the lower court. The judgment and decree passed by the lower court has been affirmed by the learned first appellate court also. The learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellant has argued the case on behalf of the appellant at length but after considering his submissions I am of the view that the controversial issues involved in the present case are relating to question of fact and there is concurrent finding of fact by both the courts below, which cannot be interfered with by this Court in second appeal under Section 100 of the CPC. No substantial question of law is involved in this second appeal and the same is dismissed in limine. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//