1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 169 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2655 OF 2009 Raju P Bendal ).. Appellant Versus M/s Ventura Corporation ).. Respondents Mr. Prashant Bhavke i/b Mr. N.V. Bandivadekar for the Appellant. Mr. Manoj Kadam a/wMr. Ranawat Jeetendra for the Respondents. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 24TH JULY 2009. P.C. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents takes up an objection to the maintainability of the Letters Patent Appeal. 2. In the Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Respondents had prayed for setting aside an order passed by the Labour Court declining to condone the delay. The Petition by the Respondent herein was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution. Reference to the same Article 227 is found in the body of the Petition as well as in the prayer clause. The learned Judge exercised the jurisdiction 2 under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and remanded the matter to the Labour Court against which the present Appeal is filed. Keeping in view the law settled by this Court in the case of Mohd. Riyazur Rehman Siddiqui vs Deputy Director of Health Services, 2008 (6) Mh. L.J. 941, we are of the considered view that the present Letters Patent Appeal is not maintainable. The same is dismissed as not maintainable. 3. In view of the dismissal of the Letters Patent Appeal, nothing survives in Civil Application No. 200 of 2009 and the same is disposed of accordingly. CHIEF JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.