AB 272/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. K. MERUNO Heard Mr. M. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. B.S. Sinha, learned Addl. PP appearing for the State. The learned Addl. PP has p roduced the CD. This is an application praying for pre-arrest bail in connection with La khipur P.S. Case No.285/10 U/S 417/376 IPC. The complaint has been filed against the accused, namely Md. Raijul Hoqu e Laskar, stating that the accused promised to marry the complainant, Miss Josna Begum Laskar and he used to visit secretly and carried out sexual intercourse w ith her; but after enjoying with the body of the said girl, the accused did not marry the said girl. The relatives tried to settle the matter of both the accuse d and the complainant and the matter was even placed before the Village Bichar b ut the Village Bichar could also not settle the matter and as such the complaina nt filed the FIR for which the present petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail by filing the present application. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the Case Diary, the girl is above 18 years old as per medical report and not a mino r. The very act of the petitioner/accused as revealed from the Case Diary is tra gic enough to depict the future life of a girl in trouble, who has been left in the wilderness after fully enjoying with her. This very act of the petitioner, i n my considered view, does not deserve any leniency and therefore, considering all aspect of the mater, this pre-arrest bail application stands rejected.