THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1045 OF 2008 ORDER: The petitioner-plaintiff filed this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking to assail the order dated 04.03.2008 in I.A.No.396 of 2008 in O.S.No.526 of 2005 on the file of the III Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, in dismissing the petition filed under Order XXVI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to appoint an advocate commissioner for examining P.W.2 on commission. After contest, without giving any reasons, the Court below dismissed the said petition on the ground that there are no justifiable grounds to appoint advocate commissioner. Heard both the sides. It is quite evident that in these days, the witness is being examined on commission through advocate and there cannot be any objection as such on the part of the respondent in the procedure as sought to be adopted. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the order dated 04.03.2008 in I.A.No.396 of 2008 is set aside. I.A.No.396 of 2008 is allowed and the Court below is directed to appoint an advocate commissioner for examining P.W.2. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 10th December 2010 RRB