1 217.11 SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.217 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.528 OF 2011 Sampat Niyati Bahadur Shilpa ...Petitioner Versus University of Mumbai & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mr.S.J.Chaurasia i/b Ashoka Law Firm for Respondent No.2 in support of Notice of Motion. Ms.Ushajee Perry with Mr.Mihir Desai for Petitioner. Mr.Rui Rodrigues for Respondent No.1. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED:- APRIL 13, 2011. P.C. 1. This Motion has been taken out by respondent No.2 College for expunging the following sentence form paragraph 11 of our order dated 18th March, 2011 which reads thus: “11. ......At any rate, the Officials of the respondent No.2 College who were responsible for granting admissions to such ineligible candidates, will have to be proceeded with in accordance with law for their act of commission and omission which in any case, reflects about their casual approach and dereliction of duty.......” 2 217.11 2. In our opinion, this is not a disparaging remark passed against the respondent No.2 or its officials. All that has been observed is that the concerned officials will have to be proceeded against, to ascertain whether it was a deliberate attempt made by them or they have acted in casual manner. In either case, the concerned Officials of respondent No.2 College will have to be proceeded against in accordance with law. That is a limited observation made by us. In view of this clarification, no further order is necessary on this Motion. Motion is accordingly disposed of. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)