Sa^m'^aFivEmsEg IN THE HIGH COURT OF JU&ICATURE AT BILASPUR c M_.C.C. N0. £W /2010 In the matter of:- C.R. No.140/06 Between; Applicants: Respondents: APPLICANTSs Versus Vasudeo & Others Bhuru & others •«» ^ ~.9~~ ^^:3--"^&,^,.:. ^•' •y,-^ ,^1 S-^»^ "'' • ^^ s /" S- •..k- / .. / /^ :^fr^ I 'v/-sssS!. «f^invS B 'i'ip^-y8-^"' g wwf;y Vasudeo, aged about 35 years, son of Brijbhusan Brahman. 2. Jhallu alias Lala, aged about 32 years, son of Bnjbhushan Brahman. Peela Prasad, aged about 29 years, son of Brijbhushan Brahman. Rajendra, aged about 25 years, son of Brijbhushan Brahman. 5. Bai, aged about 55 years, vs RESPONbENTS (Defendants) -<<"' wife of Bri.ibhus.han Br'ahman. ^W^MO Mill^-^c*'^ T^ f Wsf'- MMhW""'v '(j—'Sc/' Bhuru, aged about 53 years, son of Swaraj Prasad Dubey. 2: A. Smt. Kupeet Bai, aged about 54 years, widow of Late Shri Sanda Rai. 'B. Chintaram, aged about 34 years, son of Late Sandarai. C. Yugesh Kumar, aged about 28 years, son of Late Gandarai. &. Usal Kumar, aged about 22 years, son of Late (Sandarai. E. Bhujbal, aged about 20 years, 1 >/ &. l^ ^. Z*.y-T*s\i s i^^/^^s^i:w-^. '.•.*<;••• 'tefcy 3 ^^•m"^Ss ^ ^' son of Late Sandarai. Anil Kumar, aged about 18 years, son of Late (Sandarai. Smt. (Sayatri, aged about 31 years, daughter of Late Sadarai. K. Smt. Kantibai, aged about 30 years, daughter of Late Sadarai. Kumari Bai, aged about 25 years, daughter of Late Sadarai. Hemant Kumari, aged about 18 years, daughter of Late Sadarai. Prabha Kumari, aged about 16 years, daughter of Late (Sadarai, a minor through her natural guardian mother Smt. Kupeet Bai, widow of Late Shri Gadarai, Marar. .•IL No.ZA to K are the residents of Village Dhamantoro, Post Nartora, Tehsil <& District Mahasamund. Dharmu, aged about 53 years, son of Sukalu alias Ledanga. Boderu, son of Sukalu alias ^ Ledanga,aged about 44 years. 5,, Durjan, son of Dhanwar, aged about 53 years. Vishambhar, aged about 44 years, son of Ramsingh Patel. 7; Bahur Singh, aged about 52 years, son of Parasram, No.3 to 7 are residents of (5ram Q? iS &, Dhamantori, Mahasamund. Post Nartora, APPLICATOIN FOR RESTORATION OF CIVIL REVISION Nofi40/06 DISMISSEE) ON'>~f.2.Z010 FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION % .•0> !^2 t^ "XI-HC—78 \'> 'S^t •^WM<i, ^&mfFW, WviWy .....^!^....^3±\..l4a... an^i'tra^' (' p) 311^1 qiT^IW ?wi SII^T *•<!'» v i^ Sahu .10.2010 Shri ML Sakat, Advocate for ap|)licants Heard on IA No. 1 , application On due consideration, the app accordlngly condoned. Heard on application for restorc Learned counsel appearing foi ttjie counsel for the appellants coul b]onaflde mistake, therefore, CR No. 0^1 02.02.2010, may be restored to it^ On due consideration, 1 am a^plicants is succeeded in explainin^ tljierefore, the application is allow^i r^stored to its original file. A copy of this order be plac^c vision and the same be listed for h^arin ^NH^T iiiimi'if fstzt ^PS^R ^sifwawRl jor condonation of delay. lication is allowed and delay ItionofCRNo. 140/06. the applicants submits that 1 not appear on account of 140/06, which was dismi&sed original fi!e. sjatisfled that the counsel for the cause of his absence, ?*d and CR No. 140/06 is d on record of the original aring after tv/o weeks. Sd/- N.K.Agarawal Judae