1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2731 OF 2008 Rajendra Maruti Sone ..Petitioner. Vs. The Deputy Director, Health Services, Pune Mandal Pune and others ..Respondents. .... Mr. Nitin A. Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr. P.P. Kakade, AGP for the Respondents. .... CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 21st April, 2008. P.C. : 1. The Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution is directed against an order passed by the Industrial Court granting interim relief during the pendency of the revision application. The contention of the Petitioner is that when the complaint of unfair labour practices was pending before the Labour Court, there was a direction to the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to resume his duties. Thereafter the Labour Court dismissed the complaint on merits, holding that the appointments which were issued to the Petitioner as a sweeper were for a 2 temporary period; that the last appointment issued on 27th December, 2001 was until a duly selected candidate was made available and that the Petitioner himself had not been recruited by following a regular procedure for selection against a sanctioned post. After considering the reasoning of the Labour Court the Industrial Court has for justifiable reasons prima facie come to the conclusion that no case has been made out for the grant of interim relief. Should the Petitioner succeed in the revision application, it would be open to him to seek suitable directions with regard to consequential reliefs before the Industrial Court in revision. At the present stage the interference of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 is not warranted particularly when the order of the Industrial Court does not disclose any jurisdictional error or an error apparent on the face of the record. The Petition is accordingly dismissed. 2. It is, however, clarified that the observations contained in the order of the Industrial Court and in the present order are confined to the disposal of the application for interim relief and shall not come in the way of the final disposal of the application on 3 merits.