IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 15TH MARCH 2011 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 1853 of 2011() ------------------------------------------ (CRIME NO.130/2011 OF VALAPPAD POLICE STATION,THRISSUR DISTRICT) .... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 5: ----------------------------------------------- 1. PRANAV, S/O.KOZHIPARAMBIL SETHUMADHAVAN, AGED 19 YEARS, EDATHIRINJI VILLAGE, MUNAYAM DESOM. 2. VIPIN, S/O.PARANGATTIL VENGUGOPAL, AGED 27 YEARS, THANNYAM VILLAGE, KIZHUPPILLIKKARA. 3. SALEESH, S/O.VALLOMPARAMBATH PHALGUNAM, AGED 31 YEARS, PANIKKASSERY, MUNAYAM. 4. MIDHUN, S/O.NANDILATH PAVITHRAN, AGED 21 YEARS, EDATHIRINJI VILLAGE, MUNAYAM. 5. PRALEESH @ VALIYAMUTHU, S/O.KOLLARA UNNIKRISHNAN, AGED 28 YEARS, EDATHIRINJI VILLAGE, MUNAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM (CRIME NO.130/2011 OF VALAPAD POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT.) BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. .................................................... Bail Application No. 1853 of 2011 ..................................................... Dated: 15-03-2011 ORDER Petitioners, who are the accused in Crime No. 130 of 2011 of Valappad Police Station, Thrissur District for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 326, 447, 427 and 308 read with Sec. 149 I.P.C., seek their enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 19-02-2011. The petitioner was arrested on 03-03-2011. 2. This application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioners and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioners are released on bail, they will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. Dated this the 15th day of March, 2011. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani/