IN THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.l WRIT PETITION fS) N0. 6 ^-s-z/ OF 2007 PETITIONER ^fi>- ^5^ ^•''^1. fe.l<\'\^ I.?" fe-,. RESPONDENTS : 1 c>/' ^•0>"'' ^ \ ^^ -?. ^y ^·^^ ^' <\^ 5^«' l?>' Dinesh kumartiwari Aged about 51 years S/o shri G.P. tiwari Posted'as: senior auditor Local fund Audit Bilaspur R/o Shubhamvihar usalapur Road Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS The state ofchhattisgarh Through: secretary Finace Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director Local Fund Audit B-99, main Road Samta Colony Near: Dr. pandey Nurshing home Raipur (C.G.) 3. Inspector General ofPolice Economic offences wing Raipur (C.G.) 4. Shri C.P. Sharma Assistance Director Local Fund Audit Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^ ?@ ? 's^T •<<i<)Kn<'4, atily'i^, fsKni^y SD^T 'V^; (Tpfg^Ef) 3TI^I ^ST R-)i+ TW '3TT^?T **1 wim ^ifgg sn^r SB : Hon'ble Shrj Manjndra Moha 15-06-2010 Shri Sandeep Dubey,counsei Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Deputy NO.I i^ ana 3. None for respondent No.4. This petition has been fiied his supereession. Case of the petii as Senior Auditor jn Locai Fund Aud junlor, respondent No.4 has been pn Submission of iearned counl No.4 has besn uiaced beiow him (Annexure P-8). Further submissiol that afterfiiirig this petition, respondl ths nexi higher post of Assistai (Annexure R-1), however, he has promotion from the date when hi^ 25/01/05 (Annexure P-1). Learnec respondents may' be directed to conj on the post of Assistant Director w) No.4 is urornoted vlde order dated 2{ Learned counsei for responcji such representation, the same wj accordance with law. The aforesaid submission is j) cbl<ll<yi4il iTTO^ff T^f 'fet^ Tf^^K ^i'STRnaii^?! snrivasiava, »>. for the petitioner. dvocate Generai, for State/respondents ^ the petitionei" aggrieved on account of ^ner is that while petitioner was workini |t, Bilaspur, v'ide order dated 25/01/05 his irfioieo. >ei for the petitioner is that respondent which is dear from the aradation iist of iearned counsel for the petifioner is ints have now promoted the petitioner to Director vide order dated 23/11/07 lot been granted his due seniorifry and junior was promoted vide order dated counsel for the petitioner submits that >ider his ciaim for seniority and promotion :h effect from the date when respondent 3/01/05. ints subrnits that if the petitioner rnakes be considered on its own merits, In laced on record. ^3. -HC—78 ^ST •^WW<i, W\WI<o, F'sfVfW^ ^^Al$^./^. SiI^T Tra^' (1clid'i<<»1ET) 311^1 ^i i<;-ii+. '^an 3;n^?i sti<Hi<^ ^. wirer ^ifpr sni^i Accordingly, this petilion is fin^ in case the petitioner prefer a represe consider the said representation on ') aate or suDmission OT representauon be open for him to frake recourse to s him under the Saw. <DI*if?T4)l ^TR^ff ^f fST^ <H>1-t^f< ^aiRmaii^r iiy disposed of 'with the observ'ation that ntation ciaiming seniority and prornotion on the post of Assistant Director, i|8spondent No.l/respondent No.2 shaii lits own merits. in accordance with iaw, and taks decision on the same, exp6c|itiously, not iater than 3 monttis from ths if the petitioner is stili aggrieved, ii wiil pch iegai remedy as rnay be avaliabie to Sd/- Manindra IVIohan Shrivastava Judge