1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6628 OF 2009 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s | orders orders | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. U.B. Bilolikar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Afzal Husain, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 4. Mr. A.M. Dabir, Advocate for respondent No.5. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 8TH DECEMBER, 2009 By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 10-08-2009 vide which the learned trial Court has allowed the application filed by respondent No.5 for framing the following issues as a preliminary issues. (i) Whether this court has pecuniary jurisdiction to try and decide the present suit? (ii) Whether the suit is properly valued and requisite 2 court fees has been thereon? 2. The issue of pecuniary jurisdiction will go the root of the matter. In that view of the matter, I do not find any perversity in the impugned order passed by the learned trial Court and therefore, no interference is warranted in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence the petition is rejected. (B.R. GAVAI, J.) sut/DEC09/wp6628.09