XI—HC~22 W \m 2%;413 WW 6f9l2003 A VA , Heard Shri Sumit Jhanwar for the petitioner. ~ Shri Praveen Das, Pane! LaWyer, for thé respondents on advance copy By this wnt petmon nder Articie 2261227 of the Constituhon of indla the petitioner has c aHenged her transfer order dated 1/8/2003 by whrch shehas been tansferred from Community Health Centre, L-r“ "Bhatapara district Raipur to Primary Health Centre, Chandrakhuri, drstnct Rarpur At the retevant time the petmoner was working as a lady health visitor at Community He ith Centre, Bhatapara district Raipur, she was posted there since t 89 and she has been transferredby order dated 11812003 to Prim ry Health Centre Chandrakhuri district Raipur The petitioner h s mentioned in para 5 6 of the writ petrtron that the transfer order h s been issued Without any admtnlstrattve exrgenoree The petition r is suffering from high biood pressure on account of which it is difficult for her to travei and her reguiar treatment is going, on at hatapara. The petitioner is the s0ie earning member of the famiiya her husband is retired jHk/a person, who has already suffered heart attack and her children are also studying at Bhatapara. The transfer ordler is mala fide and illegal, therefore, the / transferorder be quashed. Ihave heard the learne counsel forthe parties. V lt is admitted fact that the petitioner waslworking at Bhatapara . since 1989. Even though n para 6.1 of the petition, it has been mentioned that the transfer rder is mala tide and illegal; but how it is mala tide and illegal, itehas not been mentioned in the writ petition and the petitioner has not b en able to establish that the transfer has been made on account of mala hde. Moreover, the petitioner is already working at Bhatap ra since 1989, theretore, it cannot be considered that the transfer as been made against any guideuline or statutory rule. if the petitio er has any famiiy problem, then she is entitled to make a represent tion before the appropriate authority and it is for the appropriate a thority to considerthe representation. Therefore, the petitioner is allowed to make a representation to respondent no.1 within a‘perod of ten days'ra‘ising ail her grievances and on the receipt of the re resentation, respondent no.1 wiii decide XI—HC-zz 0} 200 man WWIWWEm A g WW mmmw . l— A aamafm XI~HC~22 m M m Big/o; , . WWW WW U mmmWq x3 $mnm the same within a period of thirty days in an objective manner with reasoned order. With the aforesaid observatinns, this writ petition is disposed / L.C.BHADOO Judge mew of. in View of the above M.W.P. No.2515/03 and LA. No.8314/03 stand disposed of Sd/-