IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16012 of 2010 1. GORAKH MUSHAR, SON OF KAJAL MUSHAR 2. KAJAL MUSHAR, SON OF LATE NATHUN MUSHAR. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 25.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the son of the deceased had left with the petitioner but did not return and, thereafter, his dead body was found in a well having sustained several injuries. It has been submitted that there is no eye witness to the occurrence and the story of motive is also not believable in the facts of the case. In view of such, let the petitioners above named, who have fair antecedents and are in custody since 22.4.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J. F.T.C.3rd, Buxar, in Sessions Trial No. 229 of 2009 arising out of Dumraon P.S. Case No. 101 of 2008 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. 2 The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and if they are, they shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)