f&^ ^ I." Kum.ar Dewaagan, aged about 29 years, son of Late Chhedilal Dewaagan, resident of Saigapara, Waid No. 13, Sakti, District Jaujgir-Ctiaoipa (CG) Krishna Kuiaar Rathore, ;ed about 26 years, son ol' Mukund Raia Rafhore, resident of PO Naadorekala, Talisil Sakti, Distt. Jaajgir-Cham.pa (CG) Puspendra Kum.ar Ka'ushik aged about 30 years, son of Late Raghunandaii Lal Kaushik, resident of Station Road, Sakti, District Jaajgir-Cham.pa (CG) . Han^al Siagh Sidar, aged aboiit 27 years, son of Shri Lakhraa Singh Sidar. Resident of PO Jangrapara, Maurabhata, PO Mausiaiakala, Tall. Sakta, Dis'trict ijaiiigir- CIisunpa (CG) Krishna Kum.ar Rafhore, ased about 28 years, son of Late Stui Jhagh-ati. Ratliore, resident of village TohUadili, PO Jangaaj, Tah. Sakti, Distt. Jaujgu'-Cham.pa (C.G.) Suresli Kuiaar Rathore, aged about 28 years, son of Late Shri Akti Ram Rafhore, resident of Stationpara, Ward No. 17, SaJsti, Distt. Janjgtr- Champa (CG) Lal Baliadur Ratre, aged about 33 years, son. of Raialsl Ratre, resident of vfflage Dadai, PO Nandaureldiur, Tah. Sakti, Distt. Jaiijgtr-Chainpa (CG) Gajendra Kuiuar Dewaiigail, aged aboilt 42 vears, son of Late RaE&das Meliar, Akhrabhaf&a, W'ard No.IO, Distt. Jaajgir-Chauipa (C.G.) Diiip Kuinar Patel, aged about 37 years, son of Late Shri Paadit Ram Patel, resideut of vfflage aad post Garllgodhi, Tah. Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (CG) Mukesh. Kumai' Soni, aged' about 25 yeai's, son of Shri Kuakiia Prasad Soni, residenf of Raiiisagarpara, Ward No,9, Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Cham.pa (C.G.) •^. VJ'.^SLNo.lSli 12. Ram Naresli Tamboli, son of Prem. Shaakar TaiaboU, aged about 23 years, resident of near Maharaja Mandis-, Tah. Salcti., District Jaajgir-Cham.pa (C.G.) Ajay Pratap Singli, aged atoout 25 years, son of Late Ekadashi Ram. Jagat, resident of PaterapaUMi'urd, PO Rangja, Distt. Jaujgir-Chanipa (C.G.) Ved Prateasli Diwakar, aged about 25 years, son of Late Shri ChiMinual Dhendhe, resident of willaKe Paseed, PO Kiraii (Baradwail Tali. Safeti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.j Sta.tc of ChhattisgaA, thi'ough The Secretaiy, Department of Scliool Education, Dau Kalyaa Snigh Sliawan, Raipur (C.G.) Tbe Director, Lok Shikshaii Saachnalaya, Raipur(C.G.] Coilector, Distt.Jaajgir-Champa {C.G.) Distnct Education Officer, Distt. Jaujgb--Cb.am.pa (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Zila Psjichayat - Jaujgir, Distt.Janjgir- Chaiupa (C,G.) QF INDIA Sliri Saujay Kumar Agrawal, coiinsei for flie petitioners. Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. The petitioners faave been appoiated on the posts ofShiksha Karmi Grade-III on coinpassionate ground on accouiit ofdeafhof Qieir taftiers in hamess, who were serving as govemiaeat servants. 1 o- \> . ^:- Vv.P.(S) No. 1815 of2007 Leai'aed counsel for the petitioners argues that flie petitioners have aot been appointed as regvlar einployees and fhe appointment has beea given on tEiapoi^.r^' post of Shiksha Karaui Grade-III. He also argues tiiat fhey are not gettmg reg-ular pay scale of Shiksha Karmi. He refers to fhe copies of appoiiitjtaent orders filed along wifh writ petitioa. Retura on behaK' of respondents No. 1 to 4 has ah'eady been filed. Vide Para-l offhe returo., it is coatended that the petitioii.ers, (13 iu nuxaber) have been given coiiipassionate appoiutment as per tlie existing rules relatmg to fheir posts i.e. Chhattisgarh Panchayat Shiksha Karmi (ReciTiitiaent Ss Conditions of Service) Rules, 1997 on probation aad after successtul coinpletion of fhe probation period, fhe petitioners would be autoinatically entitied for regular pay scale. They Iiave also filed fhe Chart (Aiuiexure-R- 1/1) showing ffae date of appointaient of each of the petitioners, th.eir date of joioiag ia fhe i&stitution and also the date of coiapletion of probation period as also scale of pay, which tliey are receiviag presentiy. Adinittedly, fhe appoiiitaients of ihe petitioners to the post of Stuksha Kai-mi Gi'ade-III are govenied by fhe aforesaid statutory rules, fherefore, service conditions of ttie petitioners are to be ^ovemed by fhe said rules. In one of fhe appouitiuent ordcrs, which is aiuiexed as page No. 21 of fh.e petition, it lias been mentioned as condition No.4 fhat fhe probatioa period shall be of3 yeara but ruy attention is drawn towards the last Im.e of Annexure- R-1/1 tliat tlie aforesaid probatiou period of 3 years has been reduced to 2 years by circiilar No. 1895 dated 7.9.2007. In this view of the inatter, fhe contention of leamed counsel for the petitioner that fhe appoiatinents of fhe petitioners are on teiaporar}r basis or if is oa contract basis is totally misconceived. Moreover, even tiiei-e is nothing in the appoiatnient order Uke this. In view of what has been stated above and particularly iu view of adinissioiis aiade ia Pai-a-1 offhe retuiTi aad fhe docuiaents filed wifh it, it is clear fhat the petitioaers iiave nottoeen appoiated on teinporary basis but fheir appointaients ai'e m.ade subject to fhe aforesaid Rule, 1997 and ail provisions of the Rules of 1997 ;oveniiiig the sei'vice condition of Shiksha Karmi would be i3 ,i W.P.('S)No. 1S15 of2007 applicable to fheia. Therefoi^, there is no necessity of passiag any order or directioa for appouitouent of flie petitioners on regular posts. Witti tlie above obseivations, this petition is accordiiigly disposed of. Sdl- _, Suni'KumarSinha judge vatti ^'