1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.313/2007. (Murlidhar Laxman Amrutkar and Anr. Vs. Smt. Jayabai Khaire and Ors.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 13th January, 2010. ... 1) Mr.Chapalgaonkar, on instructions, informs that the possession of the disputed property is received by his client/landlord after dismissal of SLP moved by the alleged contemnor. He still maintains, three stipulations contained in the directions of the Division Bench are not complied with in letter and spirit. 2) Since the landlord has received the possession of the property, the recitals in the undertaking, short of specific reference, not to create third party right or lien over the property, in the above scenario will not change colour 2 and complexion to invite wrath of contempt. 3) Contempt Petition disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/cp313.07