THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH W.P.No.19000 of 2007 Between: P.Ranganayakulu. … Petitioner and The District Collector, Prakasham District and others. … Respondents ORDER: It is the case of the petitioner that the land to an extent of Ac.0-39 cents in Sy.No.274/10 is a poramboke land and the land to an extent of Ac.0-09 cents in Sy.No.275/1 is a rastha of Idera village, Maundlamuru Mandal, Prakasham District. The said land of 48 cents is being used by the villagers as rastha as well as public place. While so, the 3rd respondent is trying to occupy the said land. Therefore, the petitioner and others issued a legal notice, dated 20-02-2007, to respondents 1 and 2 and also to the Village Revenue Officer, Idara Village. The 1st respondent through proceedings in L.Dis.No.E2/809/2007, dated 11-03-2007, directed the 2nd respondent to examine the contents of the said legal notice with regard to the dispute relating to the land admeasuring Ac.0-39 cents in Sy.No.274/10 and Ac.0-09 cents in Sy.No.275/1 of Idara village, Maundlamuru Mandal and send reply to the said legal notice under intimation to the 1st respondent. Pursuant to the said direction, the 2nd respondent has not taken any action so far. I am of the opinion that the petitioner ought to have approached again before the 1st respondent for implementation of his directions. But, however, the 2nd respondent cannot keep quiet without taking appropriate action and without giving reply to the legal notice issued by the petitioner and others, dated 20-02-2007. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action and send the reply to the legal notice issued by the petitioner and others, dated 20-02-2007, as directed by the 1st respondent through his proceedings, dated 11-03-2007, as expeditiously as possible, without any undue delay. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 07-09-2007 Prv