THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.25818 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner was working as an In-charge Principal in a Resid School at Nirmal, established by the first respondent-Society. He occupation of a residential quarter ever since July, 2008. He claims to made representations to the respondents to fix the rent for the prem Reference is made to proceedings, dated 09.02.2007, said to have issued by the Joint Collector fixing the rent for Principal Quarter at Rs per month. The second respondent issued proceedings, dated 15.05. requiring the petitioner to remit HRA drawn by him together with 10% on the basic pay and electricity charges of Rs.65/- per month were demanded. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representations for fixin rent were not finalized and the impugned order is issued. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Sta Counsel for the respondents. The first respondent itself issued directions to various institutio fixation of the rent. The sanction of HRA would depend upon the basi and the place of working. The HRA can be adjusted in its entirety, if on quarters are in uniformity and the rates are fixed. In case, lower rent is by the competent authority, the HRA cannot be deducted. Therefore, respondent Nos.1 and 2 are directed to fix the rent fo Principal Quarter at the institution where the petitioner is working, wit period of four weeks from today. Till such time, no recovery shall be eff from the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no as to costs. ________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDD Date:20.10.2010 VGB