IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION FEMA APPEAL NO.1 OF 2008 IN APPEAL NO.1144 OF 2007 Mrs. Pooja Gyanchandra Joshi ....Appellant. v. Directorate of Enforcement & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.Shiraj Rustomjee i/by Y.R.Shah, advs. For the Appellant. Mr.L.S.Shetty with Mr.M.S.Bharadwaj i/by H.P.Chaturvedi, advs. For the Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 18TH JUNE, 2009 P.C. 1 By the present appeal, the appellant seeks to set aside the order dated 16th May, 2007 which was the order of deposit and the order dated 6th August, 2007 which was an order rejecting the application for review of that order and at the same time, dismissing the appeal. 2 The petitioner earlier against the order of pre-deposit dated 16th May, 2007 had preferred before this Court writ petition no.1501 of 2007. That petition was withdrawn with liberty on 7th August, 2007. Though the present appellant seeks to challenge the order of 16th May, 2007 also, the appeal is filed in October, 2007 and clearly therefore, it - 2 - would be barred by the limitation. Even assuming that the appeal is not maintenable, there is no application for condonation of delay before this Court. 3 In so far as the second order is concerned, the appeal was dismissed on the ground of non-deposit. Consequently, no question of law would arise from the said order. In the light of that, learned counsel for the appellants addressed attention to the judgment of Delhi High Court in Union of India v. Classic Credit Ltd. 2009 (236) E.L.T.12 Delhi. In our opinion, for the aforesaid reasons, present appeal is dismissed. 4 If the petitioner has any other remedy in law, it will be open for the petitioner to pursue the same. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)