IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10466 of 2008 ARUN KUMAR SAH & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 6.5.2008 The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the application of petitioner no.1 Arun Kumar Sah on the ground that he has been arrested. In such view of the matters, the application of Arun Kumar Sah stands dismissed as withdrawn. So far the petitioner no.2 Bilayat Ali is concerned, he apprehends his arrest in this case, namely, Katihar P.S. Case No. 427 of 2007 under Sections 420, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is the deed writer and the allegation is that he incorporated stipulation about complainant’s having received rent due for three years while her (complainant’s) husband was in inebriated condition he got his signature. The learned counsel submits that the petitioner is simple deed writer. Referring Annexure-2 it is pointed out that the complainant has already filed a compromised petition in the case and the matter has been settled latter. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, the petitioner, Bilayat Ali is admitted to bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in Katihar P.S. Case No. 427 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (C. M. Prasad,J.) Ravi/-