IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14389 of 2010 Date of Decision: August 23, 2010 Santosh Rani & Another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Amrik Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing Order dated 12.5.2010 (Annexure P-15). 2. Learned counsel contends that the petitioners have been serving the Education Department, Punjab and are eligible and suitable for promotion to the post of Lecturer. Names of the petitioners were recommended for promotion. Vide impugned order, however, the claim for promotion after consideration has been rejected CWP No.14389 of 2010 [2] with the comments “not suitable for promotion”. Learned counsel contends that no reasons have been assigned for ignoring the claim of the petitioners for promotion. 3. On a query of the Court, learned counsel has not been able to point out specifically that any person junior to the petitioners has been promoted. 4. In such circumstances, learned counsel prays for withdrawal of the petition to enable the petitioners to file a petition afresh in case any person junior to them has been promoted. 5. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (AJAI LAMBA) August 23, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?