IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10550 of 2010 1. MADHUSUDAN PANDEY S/O LATE RAMDEO PANDEY R/O VILL.- KHALGAON, P.S. GOPALPUR, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 2. BIRENDRA PANDEY S/O LATE MAHATMA PANDEY R/O VILL.- KHALGAON, P.S. GOPALPUR, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ Versus 1. MAHMAD HADIS S/O LATE ZAHUR MAHMAD R/O VILL.- SEMRA (NEW), P.S. GOPALPUR, P.O. SEMRA BAZAR, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 2. BATKA KHATOON W/O VOKIL ANSARI R/O VILL.- SEMRA, P.O. SEMRA BAZAR, P.S. GOPALPUR, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 3. ZAHRUNA KHATOON W/O MUKHTAR ANSARI R/O VILL.- SEMRA, P.O. SEMRA BAZAR, P.S. GOPALPUR, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 4. WAHID ANSARI S/O ZALI ANSARI R/O VILL.- SEMRA, P.O. SEMRA BAZAR, P.S. GOPALPUR, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 5. ROZID ANSARI S/O AALI ANSARI R/O VILL.- SEMRA, P.O. SEMRA BAZAR, P.S. GOPALPUR, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ ----------- 2/ 17/03/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners desired impleadment in Title Appeal No.55/07 on the submission that they had an interest in certain lands of the suit. The trial court by a considered order has arrived at the conclusion that the petitioners had not been able to persuade it with regard to their conduct in having approached for intervention at a belated stage of the appeal. Their individual remedy, if aggrieved, separately, is a separate matter. There is no occasion for the Court to interfere with the order to that extent. The writ application stands dismissed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)