IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 926 of 2001 BETWEEN: SMT. Y. Jangamma W/o. Late Rajamallaiah, R/o. 1-60, Jillelguda, Champapet PO, Rangareddy District. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Andhra Pradesh Housing Corporation, Rep. by its Managing Director, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad. 2 The Executive Engineer, A.P. Housing Corporation, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad. 3 The Superintending Engineer, A.P. Housing Corporation, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in seeking to lay road connecting the Housing Board Colony which is under construction on the west of my land to the ring road centre (Uppal to LB Nagar), across my land in Sy.No.471/part, Bagayath Village, Uppal Mandal, Rangareddy District, as illegal, arbitrary, without any authority in law and consequently direct the respondents not to take any action without following the procedure in law, and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.Y.JAGAN MOHAN Counsel for the Respondents: MR.V.CH.NAIDU MR. J. PRABHAKAR SC FOR APHB The Court made the following: ORDER: When the matter was taken up for hearing on 07.08.2008, as none appeared, it was directed to be listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Even today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’ and taken up for hearing, neither the petitioner appears nor there is any representation on her behalf. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for default of the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J August 14, 2008 DSK