IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44595 of 2010 MD. IMAMUL HAQUE S/O ABDUL SATTAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 16.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 364(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner was not put on Test Identification Parade nor has criminal antecedents and it has further been submitted that he was given food, thereafter, sent back home after two days of the occurrence without any payment of ransom. However, considering that there is confessional statement of the co-accused as well as the petitioner implicating him in the present case instituted for an occurrence of kidnapping for ransom, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail is rejected. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)