IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 19TH MARCH 2010 / 28TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 9257 of 2010(F) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- U.D.SHAYI,SHEENA NIVAS, P.O.PATHEYAKUNNU, PANNOOR ,KANNUR DISTRICT REPRESENTEED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SRI.BALAMOHANA BABU, S/O.BALAN, RATHIN NIVAS, P.O.PALAYAD, THALASSERY. BY ADV. MR.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.9257 of 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is a stage carriage operator conducting service on the route Kozhikode-Kannur-Payyannur with stage carriage vehicle bearing Reg.No.KL-13/J 999. The petitioner's timings were issued on 19.5.1999. Subsequent to the issuance of his timings, the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation has started operations on the route thereby drastically reducing the time gap with which the petitioner had been operating. Therefore, the petitioner has submitted a request for the revision of his own timings, along with a proposed set of timings. However, he complains that no orders have been passed thereon till date. 2. I have heard the learned Senior Government Pleader also, who submits that the request of the petitioner would be considered and orders passed, within a short period of time. 3. In the above circumstances, this Writ Petition is wpc No.9257/2010 2 disposed of directing the respondent to consider the request of the petitioner for the revision of his own timings evidenced herein by Ext.P1 in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months form the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as the other affected parties. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE css/