IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 25TH JULY 2008 / 3RD SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 28883 of 2005(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ SWARNALATHA, KAILAS, T.C.NO.58/1449, A.R.A.45, ATTUKAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI.T.S.RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI SRI.T.R.RAJEEV RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, FOOD, CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFIARS DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. SHAUKATH ALI, BETHANY COTTAGE, T.C.NO.53/1997, NEMOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.RAVINDRANATH FOR R5 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. NOBLE MATHEW FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: vkm W.P.(C)No. 28883/05 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 : TRUE COPY OF NOTIFICATION DATED 23.5.2003 ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 : TRUE COPY OF ORDER OF 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 21.6.2004. EXHIBIT P3 : TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 25.10.04 OF 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 : TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 12.8.2005 OF 1ST RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. vkm KURIAN JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.28883 OF 2005 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of July, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner is aggrieved by the appointment of the 5th respondent as Authorized Wholesale Dealer in Nemom. It is seen that the petitioner has pursued all her statutory remedies. In the counter affidavit it is seen that the petitioner herself could not establish her eligibility. It is also stated in the counter affidavit that the 5th respondent is a resident of Nemom where the depot is proposed to be situated. 2. The main contention taken by the petitioner is that the 5th respondent does not belong to Nemom. In view of the stand taken in the counter affidavit, nothing remains to be agitated. There is no merit in this writ petition. It is accordingly dismissed. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. smp KURIAN JOSEPH, J. W.P.(C) No. 28883 OF 2005 J U D G M E N T 25.07.2008