IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 95 OF 2007 SHRI. BABALAL SAYED ... Appellant Versus SHRI. RAHEMANSAB HOSMANI (DECEASED) THROUGH LR'S AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. A. D. Bhobe, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. D.J.Pangam, Advocate for the respondent No.2(b). Coram:- U. D. SALVI, J. Date:- 4th September, 2009 P.C. It is submitted on behalf of the appellant that the proper forum for preferring the appeal as per the valuation is the District Court and as such the appeal memo be returned for presentation of the appeal to the District Court. The learned Advocate Pangam for the respondent concurs with the submission made on behalf of the appellant. The certified copy of the appeal memo along with the appeal memo be given to the appellant for presenting the appeal before the District Court, Panaji within a period of two weeks from the date of return. U. D. SALVI, J. SMA