-: 1 :- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 3663 OF 1996 Tejbai Nagshi Shah & Anr. ..Plaintiffs. Versus Jethalal Surji Shah. ..Defendant. Ms. Kokila Panchal i/b M/s. Thakordas & Madgaonkar for the plaintiffs. Mr. K. H. Mody i/b Panchamatai & Co., for the defendant. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : February 23, 2010. P. C. : 1. The parties to suit settled their dispute out of the Court and have tendered consent terms dated 18th February 2010. The plaintiffs and the defendant are present in the Court. They admit that the consent terms are explained to them in Gujarati. The consent terms are duly signed by the plaintiffs and defendant alongwith their respective counsel. The consent terms are also signed by the Interpretor, High Court, Bombay who has certified that the consent terms are explained to the plaintiffs and the defendant in Gujarati. Consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The suit is disposed of in terms of consent terms.. Decree be drawn up accordingly. In view of the disposal of suit, interim order dated 7th August 1998 passed in Notice of Motion No. 2962 of 1996 stands vacated. Refund of Court fees as per the Rules. (R.V. MORE, J.)