IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19948 of 2011 Ram Surat Prasad, Son of Late Ram Lakhan Prasad, Resident of Village Chand, P.S. Chand, District Kaimur (Bhabua). ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua. 4. The Treasury Officer, District Kaimur at Bhabua. 5. The Chief Engineer, Water Resources, Bihar, Patna. 6. The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division, Mohania. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2. 17.11.2011. Heard Shri Om Prakash Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Bipin Kumar, learned A.C. to G.P.8, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 3 to 6 and learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.2/Accountant General. The petitioner, who retired as Amin on 31.7.2011 from Kaimur at Bhabua, has prayed for directing the respondents to take into account the period spent as seasonal Amin for fixation of pension in view of Annexure-1 to the writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, for the relief sought for in the present writ petition, the petitioner has approached the authority concerned by filing representation, but no decision has been taken. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be disposed of granting 2 liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned. The submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner has not been disputed by learned counsel for the respondents. In view of stand taken by the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before respondent no.6/The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division, Mohania within a period of six weeks from today along with relevant notification/circulars. If such representation is filed, the court expects that respondent no.6 will examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.6 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within two months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)