^^ HIGH CQTJBT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPTJR \VnjtP {iQn(SiN®.15.Mof2t {8 1. Aail Kumar Tirkey S/o Shri Poylus Tirl.:ey Age about 35 years, Asstt. Teacher, Primary School, Kukarieholi, Bloek Patthalgao", Distt. Jashpour (CG). 2. Smt. Merk}ia Khoren Tirkev W/o Shri Aiiil Kumar Tiikey, Age about 33 years, Assd. Teacher, Primary School, Kukarichol', Block Patthalgaoii, Distt. Jashpur (CG). ^.'ERSUS 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Thj-ough Secretary, Education & Tribal Department DKS Bhawan, Raipur(CG). 2. Assi^ant Commissioner Distt. Jashpur (CG). 3. Biock Education Qfficer Block Patthalgaon (CG). 4. Treasury, Account and Pension, Distt. Jashpur (CG). (v.rRrr pETmoN IJNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF IMDIA) present ' Sbri Somkflnt Venna. Advocate for the oetitio"E>''s, Shri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate General for Staie/respondents. ORAL ORDER ^rasatca oii A^-I Oi iviiu'cii, AI !. Leanied counsei appearing for the petitioners submits fhat the petitioners were appointed as Assistant Teacher afier obtaining Basic Trainiiig Institute (for short 'B.T-I.') certificate on their own eosts. The 'aw with regard to question as to whether the Teachers who have obtained B.T.I. examination certifieate prior to their appointment as Assistant Teacher, are entitled to hvo advance increments, is no longer res integ'a as the same has been discussed in thc matf.er of Yashwsisit KlHiiiaE' B^s'dwssi Vs.. IViiiiiicii^fl CoriioFatio?!-- DU£°@assd aiiother f2006*/m MPJR-^"<G96l.. which iiss been. disoosed o'fvide order dated 03.04.2006. 2. Sliri Vinay Harit, Deputy A_c|vc-cate General, appeariag for the State, ^ibmits that the pctitloners have iiot siibinittcd ?jiy dociui""ents iii respect of avennent niade in the oetition. 3. Be that as it ma}', since the question of law iavolved in this petition has a!ready been settled, the petitioners shall be entitled to the saine relief after verific^tioii of facis. In the event, it is found that the oetitioners have obtamed B.T.I. exaiiiination certificate prior tojoming the post of Assistant Teacher, they shall be entitled to two advanee increments accordingly. A-ccordingly, with the consent ofthe parties, the writ petition is al'owecl ui temis ofthe order passed in the case ofYashwairt Kumar Bfeardwaj Vs. Miniicipal Corporation, Durg smd smother (Supra), siibject to verification of the facts asto whether the petitioners have acquired B.T.I. Exam"iat<oa Certificate on their own expeiises as per fhe cireulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and fiirther whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ssslui