IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40486 of 2008 CHHOTELAL YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.10.2008 Heard sri Anshu Dhar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The case is under Section 392 IPC and the petitioner is not named in the FIR nor he has been put on test identification parade neither anything has been recovered from his possession. The learned Additional Sessions Judge has made reference to certain paragraphs of the case diary to note that the petitioner’s complicity in the offence was revealed by them. The contention is that if it was like that then the petitioner’s name ought to have appeared in the FIR. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.3,000/-(three thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in Narkatiyaganj G.R.P.S.Case No.21 of 2008. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )