SINGIEBE IN THE HIGHCOURTOF CHHAmSGASQI AT BILASPUR WMT PETITIO No. ^1&?' /2006 PETITIONER ...'"^ .y./y ^- RESPONDENTS SHIV PRASAD MARKAM, S/0. SHRI / D.R.MARKAM, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, ASSISTANT TEACHER, GOVT. D.M.S.HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL MAHASAMUND R/0. AYODHYA NAGAR, MAHASAMUND (C.G.) 1 *>1( :1) STATE OP CHHATTISGARH,/ THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, DKS BHAVAN, RAIPUR (C.G.) -5(' :2) COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF^ TRIBAL WELFARE, RAIPUR (C.G.) :3) THE DIRECTOR, PUBLIC / INSTRUCTION, RAIPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETiTIO?^ UNDER AS5TICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA i* XI-HC-78 *ll*lMrsh*l|ch a^'^Tr.'iRw, t9Tflyi<s, Rioi+iy n^.^.f..^s.i^. ^ 200 311^1 4a«h(li?l^c1^) 3l1^?r?iT)^-lN; (raT3TI^Tsti1 WtiraTofsdan^r l*.t.2006 Smt. HamTda Siddique, Advoc(»tefor the petitioner. Shri Sotish Suptd, Dy. ©ovt.^dv. for* the State on advance copy. Heard. By this petition under Articl^ petitioner, who is working as As] Secondary School, Mahasamund, ho^ to pay the increments & seniority| appointment in the light of the deci The main grievance of the p^ appointed as Assistant Teacher in regularized, but he has not been g situated teacher-s moved before thel for grant of regular- poy scale and| allpwed the same. The petitioner m same treatment, as he is also sim| respondents have not paid any heed. Therefor-e, learned counsel circumstances, the petitioner be tii<iFCT41-< iiHciT^''to^t<[«i+iii< ^srf^iTan^r 226/227 of the Constitution of India the ^istant Teacher in 6ovt. D.M.S. Hi9her prcyed for a direction to the respondents on the basis of the date of his initial i^ion rendered by the State Administrative Tribunol, J'abalpur in O.A. No.1452/^8 (Harish Chand Singh & others Vs. State of M.P. <& others) dated 31.1.2003. ;titioner is that vide Annexure P-2 he was the year 1989 in the School Education Department on probation for a p^riod of one yedr with the fixed salary. However, later- on, after completio^ of one year tenure, the petitioner wce ven the regular pay scale. Some similarly State Administrative Tribunal at Jabalpur the Tribunal vide order dated 31.1.2000 \sde several representations tu accord the lar'ly situated Assistant Teacher but the |For the petitioner requested that in the allowed to make a r'epr'esentation to respQndent No.l for giving the simi|ar treatment to thepetitioner herein and the same pay scale &seniority, whi^h hme been sanc+ioned to other similarly P.T.O. r-e'- H^ XI-HC-78 'SSt r<<i<iici<), ©Tfl^'is,Riciiyy tii*T^na>*n^ Wi; 200 3TT^?TT^? (^i3g?T) ac^rqiTf^-iNi 'aW3IRWs»)*ii°n 1 ^r ?RITWHf?cT3TI^T casle situated teachers on account of the b in turn, he be directed to decide the| orders, to which learned counsel for Having heard learned counsel facts and cir'cumstances of the 31.1.2000 passed by the State expressing any opinion on the merit moke a detailed representation r'aisj along with a copy of this petition turn, respondent No.l to decide the date of ceceipt of representation in the points raised by the petitioner 31.1.2000 passed by the Tribunal footings, as the applicants in O.A. N^ same poy scale and seniority. With the direction oforesaid, In view of this order, I.A. No.1 Certified copy as per rulas. ?>PTNpft:r WRlf if fWl'TfSfRTC ^•af^TTsn^r (srder of the Tribunal dated 31.1.2000 and representation of the petitioner and pass \he State has no objection. for the petitioner, having regard to the ond having re9a'd to the order dated Aijministrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, without ^f the case, the petitioner is allowed to jng all the grievances to respondent No.l wilfiin o period of 10 days from today and in ^ame within a period of 30 days from the accordance with law after considering all ond taking into account the order dated if the petitioner stands on the same N<|>.1452/98, then he be also sanctioned the ahd 1-he petition stands disposed of. ^726/06 also stands dispdsed of. Sd/- ^•c-stla judge P.T.O. V ,*•