•> IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARH) Cr. Appeal No. 4 2.3... of 2001 APPELLANT/ ACCUSED (^^-y ..»f* c IOJ-,'^ [^^Wy^^ ^fc^"^T ^'^^' ^r .^.-^"' RESPQNDENT BASANT KUMAR, AGED 21 YEARS, SON OF SHRI SANT RAM YADAV, RESIDENT OF VU.LAGE - MOHKAM, POLICE STATION- TUMGAON, DISTRICT - MAHASAMUND (CHHATTISGARH) VERSUS THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH - POLICE STATION TUMGAON, DISTRICT-MAHASAMUNQ (CHHATTISGARH) MEMO OF APPEAL MEMO OF CRIMINAL APPEAL UNDER SECTION 374 CODEOF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE B XI-HC-22 ^^[ ^!^i<n^, ^Tli^^<o, i^<ni^^ 3Ti^T^T icili<=h 3?n^T 5n<-iicb Tffi^ .A •N§^iCT-^W^ CY', (S^0,^t^3>/ "^, 200l_ "^R^Sl' ^I^T '^H^R ^fN 27.022006 Shriy.C.Sharma, Shri U.K.S. Chandel. leamedl This maner is tisted today the oppelbnt oh 13-12-2004. Shri for th®appeltant submits -that in| 16-08-2004, theappeltant did not| tanguish in jail and Iherefore could| the Court on 13-12-2004. Shri Y.C.Sharma, learned furtti&r submits thathe does not| and wouldWg^^s oppe<»(only of the.sentence of fine atnoynt poor person and hfe is not in a pc|!i fine. In view ^f -Hw pra^r niarit heard on th^ limi'^ ^yestion of Irieffact^ ofthfr ca^e' 8 A.M. when the prosecytrix. a aged about 15 years was r®tumin|| Bhanmati & Dufarin Bai. the prosecutrix and forcibly tak^J . CM14i<n41Ti w-r^f ^ fircft Tf^sR "^ ^arf^H ^^ teamed coufisel for the oppellartt; l^anel Lawyer for State. -flor default of appe<uwi^e of^ t/.C.SKarma. leamed eounsel puraifla'ioe to orcfer d<rt»<l Iftimish bail and continueito |not appear in person before [counsel for 1+w (ipl^lhaint 1 press this <ippealfon nw^^ •^^ws^'ef^i^^^ !^hoe'^•'•c^ll^^u^y], Isition to poyJ^|ltt|S||^ dtbo^, thl^ flp^a! i| fhi||f^ s^vvWws. € 2 ' • •QnP6-(^-?Q©Q^at^yt melmber of the ^pliMuted T''<b^ home from -the forest wlth adpellant codight hold of tb® her towards the forest <fen ^ -T- XI-HC-22 ^Ti^T^T ^i4) ^^ ^n:n^"?Tf^?T \/ ^^ ^I^IFI^ ^"^^•51?, f®S<r!l<rJ^< : .^•^^^•^y^/ W^3T^?W^'"""'"'"T""""or"**<'*<t<"'^ .2001, '^^8?' committed rope on her, The evider^ce stood the test of cross-extfminatlon Besides, it was dlso corroborart-ed Bai PW-7 cuid also by the medical Dr. Smt. Alka Parcbl PW-12. On th^ and unimpeqc^able evidenc^, the o|)i Section-376 3PC for coinmitt'ing 06-09-2000 in Village-Mohkam an<| years and fine of fts.5000/- cnd to undergo additional R.I. for 6j Judge while awasrding 1tie Rs.5,000/- also directed that A4 the prosecutrix as compensatiori Shri Y.C.Shamia. leanwd argued that th& cypellant is a v^ry from 23-09-200Q to 17-10-2000 < of jud9ment 24-02-2001 till datej. the appelkxnt would soon be switence of tmprisonnient, ther^f^ the appellant, iCTiiency b®^iown fir^amount. ^l^{j^^T1 'RFT^Jf.'^ 'fe^' ^fa^K ^"3tf^H3Tr^r of the proseoutrfoe PW-t end ini^jreJL confidenee. jby the testimony of ^uterin Ividenoe i.e, the tKStinwny ®f w^ basis of such retiodble, lcgeil |)pellant was convieted under jrape on Ihe proseajtrix on was sentenced to RJ. for 7 default of payment of fine months. The leamed trial of fine amount of cunount 6f fine be givw to 1+ie period of ap^eal. senltence after counsel for the appettont pooi* person and is OT jail id Ihereafter from tte ddte It was further argued tha* »mptetfri9 the substsnth^e re, in view of th®poverty of ;or reductjon of sentence of . XI-HC-22 ^"^ '^i^sy^, ^ni^4!^, f^<ni^y. ^T^T^T RTli<=h 3T1§^T '^HW^Tfi'cT TwMme f ^ ^ ; ;..^.^.^?^zt<?>8/ 'W^^T'^^NT .'/'-"''"'."""'"""""""""'^^ 200,L. ""^F^""""""""""""""""""'" ^TT^T ^^?T^R T?fN 3 iohs fl|m jujrtice Shri U.K.S.Chandel. leamed| Storte has opppasd the prayer. Having heard rival contentio|is and circumstances of the case, I sentence of f'ine<unount imposed my considered opinion, ends of cppeJlant is sentenasd to undergo of poyment of fine. In the result. Ihe appeal is | of the appellant ynder Section-3pr< sentence of ri9orous imprisonm^nt %ntence of fine ounount are mainttiirusd and considwing the facts not inclincd to reAice 1+ie ^n the dppettdnt. Heweyer, in . ; T< • :' would be served if -the IR.I. for 3 months in default sentence awarded to the oppeltatit fine is concemed, it is reduced tcf months. ^Tqf^T^ 'RTR^f ^ fecst <J^T^.K . .^ 37f^H vSTI^I. counsel appearing for the crtly allowed. Thc GonvMrt'ion 76 JPC and Ihe sybstan-Nv® for 7 yettrs jand the t. However, so far os the m default of poyn^t of rigorous impHsonwtent fop 3 Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ['!ft^ $p^^