IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19028 of 2009 1. ARVIND SHARMA @ ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA, son of late Dukh Haran Sharma 2. Binod Sharma, son of late Dukh Haran Sharma 3. Ranju Devi, wife of Binod Sharma 4. Ritesh Sharma @ Ritesh Kumar Sharma, son of Binod Sharma 5. Guriya Devi @ Guriya Kumari, daughter of Binod Sharma All are residents of village Bhikhanpur, P.S.-Amarpur, Distt.-Bnaka------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 8.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. In the case petitioners, who are father-in-law, cousin father- in-law, cousin mother-in-law, cousin brother and cousin sister, were allowed bail on 24.2.2007 while husband was alive on assurance that they have compromised the case. But after the death of the husband there could be no compromise as difference was in between the wife and husband and that only was shown to the satisfaction of the court in seisin of the record. It appears that petitioners need a modification. There may be some substance in the submission but that has not been taken into consideration by the learned Sessions Judge. I doubt if the same was raised there. Petitioners are advised to make the prayer by raising discussed points before the learned Sessions Judge which can be positively considered in their favour if they establish their case to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge. With the aforesaid observation this application is dismissed. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )