ia<s'ist?-wus.=;:ra'£: 1^ ^ fco'^ ^ ir .--^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARHl ^ WRIT PETITION No. __SS^_/2003 / PETITIONERS ..^•^' <r^ RESPONDENTS 1. Smt. Ansuiya Baai Aged about 32years, W/o Late Shri Krishna lal Satnami, R/o village Basin Tahsil Mailkhroda, Distt. ^^^ Janjgir(Cbampa). $>^.^ ^^..•^ 2.Smt. Ramayan Bai Aged.about ;^.^> j 42yearsW/oLate ShriVyay i- KumarSatnamiyillage Thangaori Tahsil Dabra Distt. Janjgir Champa (C.G.) A-v/ VERSUS 1. Union oflndia, through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Department, New Delhi 2. Ministry of Home, through its Secretary, New Delhi. 3. The State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, mimstry of Home, Raipur ^,- D^SIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 22^0F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HC-22 3T[^T^T f^ri^w^ sh^i<=h ^rit^ ^a^ Deepii ^ ^' -3-Sf -^PTI^PT, •^ftW?. ^dKiy s1n^T XR^? K^^. L^O . 3&-s^7©3 ^m^lT^h^icb'******* *'*'y*****t*^^F^ f200 'fN^sr' ^ o <!^[?I ^RTT^'^ftU <=ni^(<n<'flti 'HR^tf'? f^t <f^-^i< ^^rf^W^Tf^T SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra iVlohanlShrivastava. J. 01-02-2011 Shri Parag Kotecha, counsel a|iong with Shri Yogesh Chandra, counsei forthepetitioners. Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, co\\ nsel for respondent No.1 and 2. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Depi|ty Government Advocate for the State/respondent No.3. Learned counsei for the petiti^ners submitted that as the husband of the petitioners died in militancy oper^tion, in addition to sanctioned ex-gratia amount which has already been p^id, the petitioners are also entitied to empioyment on compassionate basjs. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, a directioi the state of employment on compassi From the pieadings made in t therewith, 1 do not find that there Is pi may be given to the State toconsider onate ground. |ie petition and the documents annexed ^ny averment or any document to show that there exists a policy of the ^tate Government for appointment on compassionate basis in such circum^tances. Therefore, no specific direction can be given by this Court. Howevel-, it would be open for the petltioners to approach the State along with such c|laim for compassionate appointment In case, such representation is made, i^ the same, in accordance with law.i petition is finaiiy disposed ofr. !t is expected that the State ^ same within a reasonable time, k( wouid be open for the State to consider VVith the aforesaid observations, the uthorities would do weit to consider the iping in mind that the petitioners are widows of iabourers, who died in miii1|ancy operation. Sd/- ManindraMohanShrivastava Judge