IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17955 of 2011 Sunil Kumar Mahajan son of Vishwanath Prasad resident of Gabhtal P.S. Danapur, District Patna ……….Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar …………….Opposite Party. ----------- 3 22.07.2011 Heard. In a criminal prosecution registered under sections 399and 402 of the Indian Penal Code as also under section 25 (1B) (a), 26/35 of the Arms Act, petitioner and two other accused persons were allegedly apprehended by the police in the wee hours on 6.11.2010. It is submitted that some other co- accused persons have already been granted bail and petitioner is in judicial custody since 8.11.2010 as such he deserves to be enlarged on bail. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M, Danapur in connection with Khagaul P.S. Case No. 123 of 2010 subject to the conditions: (a) That one of the bailors must be Govt. servant or close family member of the petitioner who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner. (b) If the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the 2 informant/prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned. (c) The petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fails to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. Rahman/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)