IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43415 of 2010 PRAMOD RAI, SON OF SRI YADU RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 18.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Khajekalan P.S. Case No. 75 of 2009 registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal code and 27 of the Arms Act. Although, petitioner is named in the First Information Report, but as per Fardbeyan of the informant itself, the informant is not an eye-witness of the alleged occurrence. The impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Patna reveals that he has passed the aforesaid order after perusing the entire case diary. The impugned order does not reflect this fact that any person has claimed to have seen the alleged occurrence. Moreover, as per office report, having similar allegation, several co-accused persons have already been granted privilege of bail by different Benches of this Court. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R.K.P. Bharti, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Patna City in connection with above stated Khajekalan P.S. Case No. 75 of 2009. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)