IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.3175 of 2001 Between: N. Ramanathan S/o C.S. Natesan R/o H.No.10-3-18/9/A, East Marredpally, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Marredpally Mandal, Secunderabad. 4 The Muncipal Corporation of Hyderabad Rep. by its Commissioner, Tank Bund, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS or other appropriate order or direction in the nature of a Writ directing the 4th Respondent to consider the application of the petitioner for permission for construction of building, without reference to the instruction of the second respondent in property bearing Muncipal No. 10-3-18/9/A (Plot No. 108 and 108/A) in S.No.74/10, East Marredpally, Secunderabad in the interest of justice as otherwise the petitioner will be put to irreparable loss and damage or pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MS.P.A.KAMALESWARI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SRAVAN} THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.3175 of 2001 ORDER: None appeared on either side. The petitioner seeks to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 4th respondent-Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad to consider his application for construction of a building, without reference to the instructions of the 2nd respondent-District Collector, Hyderabad. This Court, while admitting the writ petition on 19.07.2005, directed the 4th respondent-Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad to consider and dispose of the application of the petitioner, as per law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the order. In view of the said interim order, I am of the opinion that no orders need be passed in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, in terms of the interim order dated 19.07.2005. No order as to costs. _____________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 10.04.2008 Dsr .... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Marredpally Mandal, Secunderabad. 4 The Muncipal Corporation of Hyderabad Rep. by its Commissioner, Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 5 2. 2CCs to 6. 2CD copies