IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 20002 of 2004 Between: Venus Industrial Training Centre, Warangal, rep by Secretary/Correspondent, S. Sundara Murthy S/o Mallayyachari, R/o Warangal, Warangal district. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Employment and Training, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2 The Director General of Employment and Training, New Delhi. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to pass orders particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned show cause Notice No. D3/14405/2004, dated 4-10-2004 as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory, violative of the principles of Natural justice, and violative of Articles 14 and 19 (1)(g) of the Constitution of India, and consequently set-a side the deaffiliation proceeding initiated by the respondents and grant such other relief as this honourable High Court may deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner claims to be an Industrial Training Centre established in the year 1981 and affiliated to the National Council for Vocational Training (for short N.C.V.T). This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the notice dated 04-10-2004 issued by the 1st respondent-Commissioner of Employment and Training, A.P. Hyderabad, informing the petitioner that the Institute will be inspected in between from 04-11- 2004 to 10-11-2004 by the Standing Committee constituted to ascertain availability of infrastructural facilities therein. It appears that the said notice was issued on the basis of the inspection report submitted by the Assistant Director DGE & T Observer during the inspection held between 22nd to 31st July, 2004. The only contention raised by the petitioner-Institute is that as per the procedure for evaluation of ITIs/ITCs/Trades/Units, which are already affiliated to N.C.V.T, the inspection can be conducted only once in an year in the month of January/February after issuing notice to the Management in the proforma prescribed under Annexure II. Since the proposed inspection under the impugned notice is not in accordance with the said procedure, the petitioner seeks to set aside the impugned notice. I do not find any substance in the said contention. As can be seen from a copy of the Procedure for Evaluation filed at page No.14 of the material papers filed along with the writ petition, it appears that for the purpose of ensuring that quality of training is maintained, the N.C.V.T. constituted a Standing Committee for Evaluation which would inspect the institutions as per the procedure prescribed thereunder and if the facilities are found inadequate the affiliation is liable to the withdrawn. The impugned notice dated 04-10-2004 shows that the 1st respondent intended to inspect the Institute to ascertain the availability of infrastructural facilities since it has come to its notice that the said petitioner institute does not maintain the infrastructural facilities as per the norms/standards. May be that, a specific procedure was prescribed for the purpose of inspection by the Standing Committee of N.C.V.T., but nothing has been placed before this Court to show that the 1st respondent is not competent to make such inspection when certain adverse remarks have come to its notice as to the facilities available in the petitioner institution. The inspection proposed under the impugned notice cannot be said to be in violation of any statutory provision nor is vitiated on account of arbitrary exercise of power. The writ petition is misconceived and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ______________ 02-11-2004 vs To 1 The Commissioner of Employment and Training, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2 The Director General of Employment and Training, New Delhi. 3 2CCs to the G.P for Employment and Training, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad(O.U.T). 4 2CD copies.