THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA Civil Revision Petition No.3900 of 2007 Date: 13-8-2009 Between Pasumarthi Baby Saramma … Petitioner/ judgment-debtor No.2 and 1. Vattem Narayana (decree-holder) and 3 others … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA Civil Revision Petition No.3900 of 2007 Oral Order: Heard Sri Y.V.Srinivasan, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri S.Rama Chandra Prasad, learned Counsel appearing for respondent No.1. 2. This civil revision petition is directed against the docket order, dated 15-02-2007, in E.A.No.2138 of 2006 in E.P.No.455 of 2006 in O.S.No.519 of 2004, passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Gudivada, Krishna district directing respondent No.4 to submit the salary particulars of the petitioner herein and also to effect the attachment subject to Section 60 C.P.C., and send the amounts regularly to the Court. 3. The petitioner herein is respondent No.2/judgment-debtor No.2, respondent No.1 is the petitioner/decree-holder, respondent No.2 is respondent No.4 and respondent No.4 is respondent No.1/judgment-debtor No.1, respectively, in the execution application before the trial Court. 4. It is submitted by learned Counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is judgment-debtor No.2 and she is very keen to repay the remaining decretal amount in instalments. 5. Therefore, when the petitioner is resolved to repay the decretal amount, there is absolutely no need to attach the salary. 6. Learned Counsel for the petitioner upon instructions gives an undertaking to that effect. 7. In view of the said undertaking that the balance of the decretal amount would be paid in four equal monthly instalments, no further orders need be passed in this revision. 8. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is closed, with a direction to the petitioner/judgment-debtor No.2 to pay the balance decretal amount in 4 (four) equal monthly instalments to respondent No.1/decree-holder, commencing from September, 2009 payable on or before tenth of every succeeding month; and with a further direction to the concerned authorities (respondents 2 and 3), including the management, to release entire salary to the petitioner, without effecting any attachment/deduction, forthwith. In default, the order under revision shall become operative. ___________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA 13th August, 2009. Ak