IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14645 of 2010 MEENA KUMARI @ MEENA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 11.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner one Shambhu Sharan Singh died due to some ailment but while the viscera was examined in Forensic Laboratory, the case was found of poisoning. Petitioner’s name appeared rather added that she had provided poison to the deceased as her son was kidnapped and deceased and one Kallu Tiger were behind it. This much of the fact doubted on the ground that petitioner’s son was kidnapped. A writ was filed for his search. Police was under pressure. So, petitioner’s name was added. Further submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in the writ petition, fair investigation was demanded and again a report was called for from the Forensic Laboratory. The report is now not corroborating poisoning though that is not on record but if really that is then it appears influence of the petitioner otherwise dead body was not handed over to the family members without postmortem and there is no apparent reason for death, viscera was kept preserved. If really petitioner was suffering from tuberculosis as reported by his son in U.D. Case then that should be detected while the postmortem was conducted. Illicit relation with deceased is there who was suspected as one of the 2 killers of petitioner’s son his coming to Janta Darwar with petitioner and his blood vomiting not due to tuberculosis. All go against this petitioner not justifying bail to her. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)