1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3330 OF 2010 Rohidas S/o.Narayan Kadam APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT Mr.A.B.Kadethankar, learned counsel for the applicant. Mr.B.V.Wagh, learned A.P.P. for respondent State. (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 20/09/2010 PER COURT : 1. This is one more round of applicant to get released on bail as his earlier applications were rejected by the Courts below as well as this Court on merit. The present application is moved by the applicant for his release on bail in connection with CR No.70/2009 registered in Hatta Police Station, Dist. Hingoli, for an offence punishable u/s. 302, 498(A) of The IPC and u/s. 3,4 of The Dowry Prohibition Act. 2. In this case, after completion to the investigation, charge sheet was filed in the month of June 2009. Earlier Cri.Appl.No. 3993/2009 was decided by this Court after the charge sheet was filed before the Lower Court. One fact is clear that the said application 2 was decided by this Court considering the evidence on record against the applicant, thus, in nutshell, on merits. Now the application is moved on behalf of the applicant on two grounds that even though the charge sheet was filed against the applicant before the Lower Court, no C.A. report is filed alongwith that charge sheet. So far as charge sheet without C.A. report is concerned, it is incomplete charge sheet in the cases under the N.D.P.S. Act, where the C.A. report will play very vital role, but it is not strictly applicable to the cases under the Penal Code. 3. The applicant prays for bail on the ground that the learned Lower Court has not committed the case to the Court of Sessions. In catena of judgments, it is observed by the Apex Court that that if there is cogent evidence against the applicant, then mere delay to trial is not a ground to release the applicant on bail. What are the merits of the application, are already decided by this Court in its order dated 24/11/2009. As there is no change in circumstance other than no committal order was passed, which according to this Court is not a ground to release the applicant on bail. In the premise, application is devoid of any merits, rejected. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/SEPT. 2010/cri-appl-3330-10