IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40972 of 2009 JAI CHANDRA YADAV Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 6/ 30.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Save and except suspicion, according to the learned counsel, there is no evidence against this petitioner to involve in the incident, while missing the informant’s son was reported six days prior to recovery of the dead body from the house of one Manjay Ram. No doubt, investigation of the case is in progress but collected materials does not justify refusal of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 316 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saharsa subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. However, at the stage of hearing of the case on charge, bail so granted to the petitioner shall be justified after going through the merit of the collected materials. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)