S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 989/2008 (Tikmaram Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 10.03.2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Ms. Upma Rawal for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, P.P. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and public prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. On careful perusal of the order impugned, it appears that there is allegation of embezzlement of Rs. 18 lac. The petitioner being the public servant and custodian of the said amount alleged to have embezzled. In such matters, custodial interrogation is necessary and therefore, in my view, no case for anticipatory bail is made out. The bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp