24# S- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NIIW DELHI + CI{L.REV.P. 56612009 &. Crl. M.A. 433712011 & 433812011 TEJ BAI-IADIJI{ RAI & ANR 'fhrough: None. VETSUS PARVEEN KUMAR JAIN & ANR. ..... Petitioners ..... Respondents Through: Respondent No. 1 in person. Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDEIT 14.11.2011 Despite pass-over none is present on behalf of the Petitioners. Even on the last date none was present on behalf of the Petitioners. In this case execution of non-bailable warrants against the Petitioners was stayed vicle order dated 22"d March, 2Ol0 on thc staternent of the Pctitioners that they were trying to arrive at a settlement. Itespondent No. I who is present in person also states that though initially payments were made, however, thereafter no payment is being made and the cheques issued the Petitioners have already :0,L, bounced. Since none is present on behalf of the Petitioners today and none was present on the last date of hearing, petition and applications arc dismissed for non-prosecution. l,r,X6--ML MUKTA GUPTA. J. NOVEMBER I4,2OII tvnt Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified