THE HON'BLE MR JUSTI CE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.11936 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioners and the 2nd respondent are neighbours. The grievance of the petitioners is that the 2nd respondent is making unauthorized construction on the premises bearing No.9-7-97/1, Maruthi Nagar, Chempapet, Hyderabad and though the same was brought to the notice of respondents 1 and 3, no action has been taken thereon. The 2nd respondent filed a counter affidavit stating that she obtained permission initially from the then Gram Panchayat in the year 1986 for construction of ground floor and thereafter from the erstwhile municipality to construct first floor. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 3 and the learned counsel for respondent No.2 At one point of time, this Court called for a report from the 3rd respondent as to the stage of construction. The report was submitted to the effect that the 2nd respondent made construction of ground and first floors on the basis of the permission and unauthorized constriction of second floor and part of third floor was made. The 3rd respondent has also stated that the 2nd respondent submitted application seeking benefit under the Building Penalization Scheme. During the course of hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the application submitted by the 2nd respondent is still pending. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that it shall be open to the petitioners to raise their objections before the 1st respondent vis-à-vis the application submitted by the 2nd respondent for regularization and the same shall be taken into account, as and when the 1st respondent considers the application of the 2nd respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 29.04.2010 JSU THE HON'BLE MR JUSTI CE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.11936 of 2008 Date: 29.04.2010 JSU