IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2596 of 2010 Suresh Paswan & Anr. Versus Rohini Devi & Ors. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For O.P. Ist Set : Mr. Kundan Kumar & Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Advocates For O.P. 2nd set : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate ................ 9 06.07.2011 It appears that the order dated 01.9.2010 suffers from typographical error as in the fifth line of the said order, civil revision in place of MJC application has been typed. Let the word civil revision be read as MJC application in the order dated 1.9.2010. Order dated 1.9.2010 stands modified to the above extent only. I.A. No.7678 of 2010: This application has been filed for condoning the delay of 108 days in preferring this MJC application. No counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the opposite party no.1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite party 1st set and 2nd set. On being satisfied with the reasons mentioned in paragraph 3 to 5 of this application, the same is allowed and 2 the delay in filing this application is hereby condoned. Now I proceed to consider the MJC No.2596 of 2010 on its own merit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and opposite parties 1st set and 2nd set. This application has been filed for restoration of Civil Revision No.1271 of 2007 which stood dismissed for want of prosecution on 11.02.2010. On being satisfied with the reasons mentioned in this application the same is allowed and Civil Revision No.1271 of 2007 is restored to its original file and number . Sanjay-II (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)