.u-u 0‘1? €9W5w vs $ 6W {Ra }. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAT'PISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. w. P. ,(S) N0. wog /2009 V , Permanand Yadav, S/ o —Shri Suraj Lal Yadav, Aged about 5O years R/ o Village — Chandan Nagar, Post — Premnagar Presently working as Head Master, In Middle school Raghunathpur, Distt. Sarguja, Chhattisgarh, w VERSUS 1 . / State of Chhattisgarh, Through ~ Secretary, Adim Jati 8L Anushuchit Jati Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, . Collector, A,h CA ‘: ‘ Ambikapur, Distt. — Sarguja, 3. /,Chhattisgarh, Assistant Commissioner, 1\ i Tribal Welfare Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja C.G. RESPONDENTS / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE ‘§w*’¢/ K CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE‘O‘F MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI ETC. Mm r/fA—‘e— , HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH i BELASPUR) WRET PETET!ON (S) NG.4106 OF 2009 PETETIONER Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattésgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india} Siagia Benah : Ham’bia Shi'i Satiah K. Agaihctii, J. ‘Preseni :- Shri Neeraj Me'hta, Advocate for i‘he petitioner. Pemanand Yadav Shri Satish Gupta, Government Advocaie for the Statefigspendents. (Passed 9n Q: this DERFL'QEAQ 1:? day cf Aprii, 201 1} Heard ieamed counsei for the parties. 2. By this petiiion. the petiiioner seeks i0 chaiienge ihe iegaiity and vaiigiity of the order dated 38f06i2009 (Ann‘exure Fri) by which the petitioner has been transferieti from Surguja to Raigarh. 3. Leamed counsei appearing for the State submits that the petitiorier has aiready continued at the oi'iginai piece of posting fei more than 1 year and S months on account of interim order dated 06/88/200§ granted by this Court. The State/respondents may be granted tiberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in vtew pubtic interest and administrative exigency. Learned counsei further submits that the State/respondents shaft not instst uoon comptiance of the tmpugned oro'ter ctatect 30/081’2008 (Annexure PH). tt is accordingly ordered. 4. Stnce no effect couid be given to the impugned order dated 3Gr’06/200§ {Annexure PIT) on account of the interim order dated G6i08f200§, it is not necessary to go into theiegalityand vaiioiity of the impugneci orcter dated 30l06/2009 (Ah/nexure Pit). in the facts of the case. in vtew of the above, according to learned 'counset appearing for the -‘ petitioner. nothing survives in this petition for adjudication at this stage. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. iiif‘ i l ”#gr 7 Sdl- . . ‘ atish K. Agnihotn'i Judge ' r r Arun . x S