IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2142 of 2011 GUNJAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 8.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Allegation against the petitioner is that he caused firearm injury on the thigh of the informant. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that independent witnesses have not supported the prosecution case vide paras 38 and 39 of the case diary and apart from this the female members of the house of the petitioner have not heard the sound of firing and, therefore, in the aforesaid circumstance, the prosecution story appears to be doubtful. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to extent the privilege of bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Chausa P.S. Case No. 6 of 2007 stands rejected. However, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after completion of one year in custody, if his trial is not concluded within the above stated period. Prakash ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)