THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2248 of 2005 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.1130 of 2003 in the Court of the IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ongole against respondent No.1 for the relief of mandatory injunction in relation to a compound wall. In that suit, he filed I.A.No.50 of 2004 under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C., with a prayer to implead respondent No.2 herein as defendant No.2. Through its order, dated 14.10.2004, the trial Court dismissed the I.A. Hence, this revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the first respondent. The petitioner did not seek any public law remedy against the municipality, the proposed respondent. The relief claimed in the suit was purely private in nature against respondent No.1. The trial Court discussed the matter from the correct perspective and dismissed the application. This Court is not inclined to take a different view. While admitting the revision on 29.04.2005, this Court did not grant any order of stay. The result is that the suit may have been disposed of or has been proceeded with against respondent No.1 alone. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:07.09.2009 kdl