IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2008 / 21ST JYAISHTA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1285 of 2008() ------------------------------ CC.1341/2005 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-II, KOTTARAKKARA .................... REVN. PETITIONER: DEFACTO COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------------------------- SARADA, D/O.KURUMBA, CHARUVILA VEEDU, AAKKAL MURI, VELINALLOOR VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENTS: ACCUSED & STATE: ----------------------------------------- 1. ARIFA BEEVI, W/O.SHAMSUDHEEN, KIZHAKKUMKARA PUTHEN VEEDU, AAKKAL MURI, VELINALLOOR VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. SAIFUNIZA, D/O.ARIFA BEEVI, KIZHAKKUMKARA PUTHEN VEEDU, AAKKAL MURI, VELINALLOOR VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI. P. RAVINDRA BABU, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR , J. ========================== Crl.R.P. No. 1285 of 2008 ========================== Dated this the 11th day of June, 2008. ORDER The petitioner who is the complainant in a private complaint alleging offences punishable under Sections 341 and 323 r/w Section 34 IPC, challenges in this revision the order of acquittal passed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Kottarakara. His remedy is not revision, but an appeal. Hence, this revision which is not maintainable is dismissed as such without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file an appeal after seeking special leave. The certified copy of the order of acquittal shall be returned to the petitioner. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv