CRM-M-15822 of 2009 - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CRM-M-15822 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: 03.08.2009 **** Surjit Ram . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab and another . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN **** Present: Mr.Rana Partap Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Ranbir Singh Rawat, AAG, Punjab for the respondent No.1/State None for the complainant/respondent No.2. **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J.(ORAL) As per the office report, previous notice issued to respondent No.2 has been received back duly served. No one has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.2/complainant. Mr.Rana Partap Singh, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states at the bar that though the petitioner was informed about the order dated 8.7.2009, yet he has not complied with the said order. In this case, it seems that neither the petitioner is deliberately appearing before the Court below, even though the process of proclamation has been started, nor he is complying with the order passed by this Court. CRM-M-15822 of 2009 - 2 - Therefore, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail and the same is hereby dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) AUGUST 03, 2009 JUDGE vivek