EW,W,W mm (W) Wm an 200 . .............. mm WWW mm%wmt $3imm Applicani' Claimam‘ Vs Respondem‘s Insurer Owner Driver Present Mr. M.T. Haider, Advocu‘re HIGH CGURT Of : CHHATTI5GARH AT BILASPUR ‘C.C‘ NO.206 /O7 g Single Bench; H 'bie Mr. Jusfice Dhirwdm Mishraz Devkumari, aged aboui’ 25 years, W/a Jagbandhan 60nd, R/o Tivamgudi, P.5. Ramanu‘jnagar, Tahsil Sumjpur, Dis-hf. Sarguja (6‘6) Branch Manager, Insurance The Orienfa! Unwed, Road, Ambikapur, (C.6.} ‘33 Na‘t'hu Ram, 5/0 Ganpa'f Ram, aged abguf 30 years, Casfe Rajwar, R/o Village Ranpur', aged (UP) a? presenf R/o Parradand, Ambikapur, Dis'r'r. Surguja (C.6.)’ Caste Musalman, R/o Bidar, P.S. Dudhi, Disf'l'. Sonbhadhm for The applicams. Vi! iage Company Ambedkupur Chowk, Munendmgarh Dis-H. Sarguja P.5. & Tahsil Ambikapur, DIS‘H’. Sarguja' (CE) Babu Khan, 5/0 Mahd Isar Khan, abou‘r 45 years, . Wm W 200 mm (W) mwm mm‘m mmmiém $ai§mm WWW b \ 27. 7. 2007 Heard. The applican-i' has preferred fhis applica+ior1 far res-rom'rion of M.A.[c]' No.686/07, which was dismissed an 28.6.2007 for wanf of prosecu'rion. Learned counsel for The cppiican'r submi'rs fhaf fhe counsel appearing for 1'he appellan'r overloc ked The cause lis? and Therefare, no ene appeared when the maf‘rer was cailed. Taking info considem'i'ion i’hai' fhe insi’an‘i’ appeal has been dismissed far wanf of prosecu‘fion because of fhe misfake on fhe par? of counsel for fhe appellant fha application is allowed subjecf fa paymenl' of cosf of Rs.200/~‘ 'l'o f MA. [c] No‘686/07 be resfored fo 1e High Cour? Legal Aid Commif‘l'ee. Learned counsel for The applioan'l' shall submif before /fhe ifs original number. §egisfry flie receipf showing The paymenf of cosf. sél‘ aawswa 9hxge$3gd%e »—L‘