.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1885 OF 2006 Mahatma Gandhi Vidya Mandir ...Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents. .... Mr.Anilkumar Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni, Associate Advocate General with Mr.M.D.Naik, A.G.P., for the Respondents. .... CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : AUGUST 11, 2006. AUGUST 11, 2006. AUGUST 11, 2006. P.C.: 1. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. Having heard the learned Counsel and as the petitioners have now received recognition from the AICTE and considering that the Respondents have already commenced the admission process, the petition can be disposed of by issuing the following direction. 3. The Respondent Nos.1 & 2 to take steps to fill in seats in the petitioners’ college from amongst students already on their list from the .[2]. stage of second round. If the first round is still not over and if it is permissible then from the first round. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. [F.I.REBELLO,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]