^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT Pm'mON (Q No. 2349 of2007 RETITIONER RESPONDENTS Pradeep Uppal S/o Shri Jeet Kiuaar Uppat, a^/sd about 49 years, Coatractor, R/o Bada Bazar, Mungeli, Tahsil aad Distnct Bflaspur. VERSUS 1. Stete of Chhatdsgarh Thiough the Secretary, Departinent of Urban. Adniiuisteatioa and Developinent, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Muaicipal Councfl, MuagcM, Through its Chief Municipal Officer, Mungeli, Tahsfl and District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER AKTICLE 226 OFTHE CONOTITUTIQN.OF INDIA SB: Hoa'ble Sbri SatishK. Agnlhot»i,_J. Shri Sourabh Shanna, Ad'vocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Goverrunent Advoeate for fhe State. 2. ORDBR (OR&I.) (Passed on 07th day of July, 2009) , Learaed coiuisel appearing for the petitioner, on instructiaus, subiaits that the contract period ie, from 01.04.2007 to 31,03.2008, which was iu dispute has already comc to aa end and as such, no cause of action survives and fhe petition has becoaie iafructuous. l^anaed couiisel appearing for ofher side have no objection. Consequenfly, fbe writ petition is dismissed as havang becwne in.fructuous. Interim order dated 16.04,2007 and 01.05.2007, axe vacated, — Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge