HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No. 1517 of 2009 DATE: 16-12-2010 Between: V. Nadhamuni Chetty …….. petitioner and K. Pitchaiah …….. respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No. 1517 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner herein is the plaintiff who, by this Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeks to assail the dismissal order, dated 20-02-2009 in I.A.No.767 of 2008 in O.S.No.125 of 2007 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Srikalahasti, where he sought to handover witness summons to a witness, who is a Cashier. Heard both sides. The Court below, after taking into account the entire facts and circumstances and also the chequered events, observed that the application has been filed much later after adducing the evidence and when the matter is coming up for arguments and therefore, such a belated application is unjustified. That apart, the Court below also observed that nothing has been pointed out either in the affidavit or anywhere that on what aspect the petitioner wanted to examine the Cashier, and accordingly, dismissed the application. Having regard to such findings recorded by the Court below, I do not find any ground to interdict the same. There are no merits in the Revision Petition. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J Date: 16-12-2010 YCR