IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28716 of 2010 LAL BABU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 23.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Informant and one Punam Tamang were working in Orchestra Party of co-accused persons, Anil Pandey and Sunil Pandey. Often, they were committing rape upon them. Both the girls were watched by the Owner of Orchestra Party. In the statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C., this petitioner is also named as watchman which never can be taken for refusal of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Chanpatia P.S. Case No. 98 of 2010 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bettiah, West Champaran subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)