1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6010/2010 Sitaram vs. State & Ors. Date of order : 28/4/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri N.R. Saini for the petitioner. ****** Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though he has worked on contract basis on the post of IEC Coordinator at the district level and which post would be available even during the year 2010-2011 as per the letter dated 23.3.2010 issued by the District Programme Coordinator-cum-District Collector, yet his services have not been extended beyond 28.2.2010. It is contended that subsequent letter dated 28.3.2010 issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Ajmer cum Additional District Programme Coordinator cannot be made the basis for not extending the contractual appointment of the petitioner beyond 28.2.2010 because the proposal for retaining the post of IEC Coordinator has not yet been finally turned 2 down by the Finance Department of the State. The appointment of the petitioner was admittedly made on contract basis and it was made for rendering services on the post of IEC Coordinator at district level as is evident from the letter of the Chief Executive Officer dated 29.3.2010. The said post has not been created in the staffing pattern of NAREGA at the district level for the year 2010-2011. This Court cannot require the respondents to keep the post revived or continued only because petitioner was granted contractual appointed in the year 2009. If and when any post is created the petitioner can approach the District Programme Coordinator-cum District Collector for giving him preferential treatment over any other candidate, but so far the post is not available, therefore, no case is made out for interference. The writ petition is dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/