1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1495 OF 2005 Mrs.Manjiri Madhukar Deshmukh .. Petitioner. Vs. M/s.Omega Information System and Anr. .. Respondents. Mr.Ashutosh Kulkarni for the petitioner. Mr.Chetan Patil i/b Mr.S.S.Patwardhan for respondent no.1. Mr.S.R.Shinde A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 14TH JUNE, 2006 DATED : 14TH JUNE, 2006 DATED : 14TH JUNE, 2006 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has impugned the order dated 29th April, 2005 passed below "Exhibit 41" in Summary Criminal Case No.2273/2001 rejecting the application filed by the complainant under section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The application is based on the fact that in another case between the same parties some admissions are given by the accused and that he desires to bring them on record in the instant proceedings. I perused the order. I don’t find any legal infirmity in the impugned order. For bringing certified copies of the evidence recorded in another proceedings on record an alternative remedy is available in the law. It is open for the petitioner to adopt such remedy for which he need 2 2 2 not step into witness box. If such an application is filed by the petitioner same may be considered in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the impugned order. With these observations the writ petition is disposed of. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)