IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 8466 of 2008 Between: Anisetty Papayamma, W/o. Gangaraju, R/o. Yadavole Village, Devarapalli Mandal, West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal, Secretary to (Revenue) Land Acquisition Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hdyerabad. 2 Land Acquisition Officer-cum-Revenue- Divisional Officer, Kovvur, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not referring the petitioner claim to the competent Civil court for determination of market value of the petitioner land acquired in award No. 1 of 2007 (SWLA), dt. 17-8-2007 as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative of the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act and offends articles 14, 21 and 300A of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to refer the petitioner claim for determination of market value to the competent civil Court and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.8466 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: The only grievance of the petitioner is that after completion of land acquisition proceedings and at the time of payment of compensation, she received the same under protest and she got issued a legal notice on 22.4.2008 seeking reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act to the competent Civil Court, and in spite of the same, the matter is not being referred. There is no necessity of going into all the details. The learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents placed before the Court the letter issued by the second respondent dated 22.4.2008, wherein it is stated that in view of the orders passed in a similar Writ Petition No.865 of 2008, the case of the petitioner i.e. Smt.Anisetty Papayamma W/o Gangaraju has been referred under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act to the learned Senior Civil Judge, Kovur. In view of the same, nothing survives in the writ petition for further adjudication. The writ petition is accordingly closed. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 17.3.2009 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.8466 of 2008 17.3.2009