CWP No. 7493 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No. 15770 of 2008 and CWP No. 7493 of 2008 Date of Decision: December 17, 2008 Raghbir Parshad and others ...... Petitioners Versus The State of Punjab and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.Amit Chopra, Advocate for the petitioners. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This petition is stated to be covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court dated 21.07.2008 rendered in CWP No. 15554 of 2007, Gian Chand and others v. State of Punjab and others. From a perusal of the averments made in the writ petition, these facts are borne out,however, learned Sr.DAG, Punjab states that this writ petition was admitted straight away and till date no written statement has been filed. On facts, he cannot distinguish the judgment given in CWP No. 15554 of 2007, Gian Chand and others v. State of Punjab and others. In these circumstances, the writ petition is allowed in the same CWP No. 7493 of 2008 2 terms as in CWP No. 15554 of 2007. The petitioners are also entitled for the revised computation of pension and other benefits, as per circular letter No.3/13/2001-3FPPG/8587 dated 31.10.2006. However it is made clear that in case on subsequent verification it transpires that on facts the case of the petitioners is not covered by the above said judgment, it would be open to the State to move for modification of this order. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE December 17, 2008 sunita