IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 8TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 29087 of 2008(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- S.MURUKAN, KURAVANKONATHU VEEDU, EDATHARA P.O., KADAKKAL, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.PREMCHAND RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE KADAKKAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KADAKKAL P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. THE SECRETARY, KADAKKAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KADAKKAL P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. VASUMATHI, VASUMATHI VILASATHIL EDATHARA P.O., KADAKKAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.29087 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of September, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed Exts.P3 and P4 petitions before the 2nd respondent complaining of illegal construction by the 3rd respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P3 and P4. 2. From Exts.P3 and P4, I see that the same have been received by the 2nd respondent. Therefore, I feel that the 2nd respondent can consider and pass orders on Exts.P3 and P4 expeditiously. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exts.P3 and P4, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and the 3rd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this W.P.(c)No.29087/08 2 judgment. The petitioner shall forward a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition to the 2nd respondent for compliance. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd