IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11431 of 2009 Nandani Kumari wife of Late Satyendra Kumar, resident of village Raja Bigha, Police Station Narahat, District Nawada Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, Nawada 3. The District Superintendent of Education, Nawada 4. The District Development Commissioner, Nawada 5. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat, Konibar, Police Station Narahat, District Nawada 6. The Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Konibar, P.S. Narahat, District Nawada 7. Bindu Kumari, wife of Sanjay Kumar, resident of village Sorhipur, P.S. Narahat, and District Nawada ----------- 02/ 04.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner was an application for the post of Anganwari Sewika, but could not be selected and appointed as the post was filled up by appointing private Respondent no. 7, Bindu Kumari. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that appointment of private Respondent no.7 as Anganwari Sevika was wholly illegal and with such allegation petitioner questioned her appointment by filing petition before the District Programme Officer who having heard the parties passed order, bearing Memo No. 723 dated 11.10.2008, Annexure-5 to this application, whereunder the appointment of private Respondent no.7 was cancelled with direction to initiate fresh process for appointment and to consider the case of the petitioner and other eligible persons. It is further submitted that although removal order was passed, which is dated 11.10.2008, but till date private 2 Respondent no.7 is functioning as Anganwari Sewika for the centre in question and as she is not being asked to vacate the post fresh process for appointment has not yet been initiated. It is also pointed out that petitioner has already represented before the District Magistrate, Nawada about the inaction of the authorities in complying with the order of the District Programme Officer, bearing Memo No. 723 dated 11.10.2008, Annexure-5. 4. Let the District Magistrate, Nawada consider the representation of the petitioner, which has already been filed. Petitioner should file copy of the earlier representation before the District Magistrate, Nawada, who should ensure compliance of the order of the District Programme Officer dated 11.10.2008, Annexure-5 as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)