C^- ^er^ S.B. fService Matter) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT pEnnoN (suia ^ ^_ /2011. $' PETITIONER: ^\- s^-* ^<... ..-.»p'' Jwala Prasad Sharma, son of Pyarelal Sharma, aged about 55 years, working as Upper Division Teacher Govt. Middle School Kumhari (Kasdole), Education District Baloda Bazar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Respondents versus »i S.8. K«»sk?k) * t\ ^^- ..^y Y^T»»* '»»-,^ ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. District Education Officer, Baloda Bazar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur, Distaict Raipur, C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IN^IA ~*^& xAc-22 311^1 ^iT 1^:ii??3iit^i •arqRi'dfTO -3-3[ -iiiiiici'4, dTfl'y'id, f»«ni«i< sf^y 'tRrar .^-•l.CS?.!^::.?.?..?.7^'!! IITHMI Sbllcb Wi, 200 fere^T' aii^g ?^'iwaf?(f SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohdn Shrivastava. J. 10^1-2011 Shri C. Jayant K. Rao, ooun^f Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawy^r copy. l-1eard. Learned oounsel appearin^ petitioner is entitled to benefit of tw|o having passed B. T. I. examination] It is submitted that the issue involv^d integra and the same has been Court in the case of Asha Saxert^ MPJR (SC) 59. It is further submitted that this his order dated 06-02-2009 passeip counsel for the petitioner further dr^ws 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal| the judgment of the Supreme Coi(rt and the order passed by this Coijrt direotions have been issued for advance increments as per ciroulaj of Madhya Pradesh, after ve'rificatio|i Learned counsel for the petitioner would also be oonsideredl •*i^Iivi41-< ^MvS'? fest <R>i*$i< ^? aifititi gn^i el for the petitioner. for the State/respondents on advance for the petitioner submits that the advance increments on account of he [before his appointment at his own cost. in the present petition is no longer res fl|iatty deoided by the Hon'ble Supreme vs. State ofM.P. & Ors., 2009 ftll) Court has also taken a similar view in in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned attention of this Court to order dated No.124 of 2009, wherein relying upon in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) in another Writ Appeal No.87/2009, cohsideration of the case for grant of two dated 21-09-1974 issued by the State of the facts pleaded in the petition. r^spondents submits that oase of the lon the same lines. 'u Iw^ ife^; •^."^ ll-HC-22 TST ^qraRpT, 'g^twre, faciiyy ^-9 3TRST TR^ \.^X^^^l HW?\\ *NI<») 1^1\ "^ 200 fe^T' 311^1 ^iT Vw* s^V 5ti^ict) -y^a In view of the statement mad of with a direction to the respondenl claim of the petitioner for grant of fr dated 21-09-1974 issued by the Stal of the facts pleaded in the petitior today. chl^ld4iT1 *llH<nT ^ f^t •lf^l-^.l< ^arfSgqan^r p above, this petition is fjnally disposed authorities to consider and decide the vo advanoe increments as per circular ;e of Madhya Practesh, after verification within a period of eight weeks from Manindra Mohan Shrivastav, Judge 'a [v^ 7:fe^