1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1794 OF 2009 Saraswati Singh .. Petitioner. Vs. The Commissioner of Police & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.Niranjan Mundargi for the petitioner. Mrs.M.M.Deshmkh A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 15TH MARCH, 2010 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. On 14.12.2009 the following order was passed: “1. The learned APP has tendered an affidavit in reply of Vilas Dashrath Kale, Assistant Police Inspector, EOW, Unit-III, CB, CID. The same is taken on record. Copies of which have been furnished to the other side. API is present in the court. The learned APP after seeking instructions from API Kale who is the I.O. states that the report in the case would be filed before the court of Metropolitan Magistrate having Jurisdiction over the matter within a period of 10 weeks from today. 2. From the affidavit in reply, this court finds that the Investigating Agency has made substantial progress in the investigation of the case and they 2 should be given sufficient time as sought for filing report.” 3. Mrs.Deshmukh, learned A.P.P., on instructions from API Kale, submits that he will complete the investigation and submit appropriate report within a period of four weeks from today. Her statement is accepted. In view of the statement made by learned APP we dispose of this writ petition since in our opinion the main prayer in the writ petition stands satisfied. All contentions of the petitioner and the intervenor are kept open to be raised in appropriate proceedings. The writ petition is disposed of. (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)