IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.5818 of 2011 Date of Decision : March 31, 2011. Gurjit Singh Brar .....Petitioner versus Chandigarh Administration, Chandigarh and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.S.S.Salar, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a direction for the proper investigation into the alleged deliberate loss of Rs.25000/- caused to him by respondent No.2-Oriental Bank of Commerce Branch. The petitioner is said to have suffered the above-mentioned loss as a result of the `fraud' committed by some one but no effort is being made to prosecute the offender in accordance with law. The petitioner is said to have made a complaint on 7.9.2010 (Annexure P-2) to the S.H.O., Police Station Sector-34, Chandigarh, but no action is said to have been taken thereon so far. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, however, without expressing any views on the merits of the allegations made by the C.W.P.No .5818 of 2011 2 petitioner, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh and the S.H.O., Police Station Sector-34, Chandigarh to take cognizance of the complaint, if any, received from the petitioner and enquire into it in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Meanwhile, if the respondent-bank satisfies that the petitioner has actually made to suffer a loss let the amount of actual loss be re- imburse to him as per the prescribed procedure. Dasti. March 31, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE