IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1844 of 1984 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.C.SRIVASTAVA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- NOOTAN ENGINEERING WORKS Versus VADILAL DAMODARDAS SHAH -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR NITIN M AMIN for Petitioners MR RN SHAH for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE D.C.SRIVASTAVA Date of decision: 18/02/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT A xerox copy of the terms of compromise entered into between the parties outside the Court is being tendered by the learned counsel for the revisionist with a request that it may be placed on record. Mr R.N.Shah, learned counsel for the respondent states that the respondent-landlord has already received possession of the tenented premises and nothing survives in this revision. On these facts the revision application has become infructuous and the same is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. *** (mohd)