1 5 wp.23.10 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMIhadNAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 23 OF 2010 Narendra s/o Mahavir Prasad Sharma. ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ... Respondents ----- Ms. Seema i/b A.M.Saraogi for the Petitioner. Ms.Pallavi Dedhia i/b Sanjay Udeshi and Company for Respondent No.3. Mr. D.P.Adsule, APP for the State. ----- CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR and P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE : 28 th October, 2010. P.C. The grievance of the Petitioner essentially is that the Respondent No.3 – Bank is pestering the Petitioner for payment of certain amounts even though the Petitioner has had no transaction with Respondent No.3 – Bank. On the other hand, the learned counsel for Respondent No.3 – Bank submits that the Petitioner had taken loan from the Respondent No.3 – Bank. In response to this argument, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that Respondent No.3 - Bank be directed to furnish documents indicating the liability of the Petitioner to pay the amount demanded from the Petitioner by Respondent No.3 - Bank. The learned counsel for Respondent No.3 - Bank on instructions states that copies of the relevant documents will be forwarded to the 2 5 wp.23.10 Petitioner within two weeks from today. That assurance is accepted. In view of the above, no further direction is required in this petition as the learned counsel for the Petitioner is not in a position to articulate as to what is the offence committed by Respondent No.3 - Bank for the inaction of furnishing relevant documents. Hence petition disposed of on the above terms. [ P.D. KODE, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]