((-1-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1584 OF 2009 Pukhraj M. Lasod and another Applicant versus State of Maharashtra Respondent Suresh M. Jain for applicant. P.M.Purohit i/by M.D.Mali & Co. for respondent no.2. Ms.S.V.Gajare, APP for the State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 28th April 2009 PC : 1. Rule. Learned advocate for the second respondent waives service. Learned APP waives service for the State of Maharashtra. 2. This is an application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The prayer made is for quashing the criminal proceedings initiated on the basis of FIR registered on the basis of the complaint filed by the second respondent alleging commission of offence under sections 103 and 104 of the Trademarks Act, 1999. The prayer for quashing has been made on the basis of settlement between the applicants and the second respondent. Affidavit of Mr.Rajkumar Dubey, the representative of second respondent is ((-2-)) placed on record. In the said affidavit it is stated that subsequently there was a settlement between the parties and all disputes have been amicably resolved. The learned counsel for the second respondent has no objection for grant of relief prayed for in this application. 3. Considering the nature of allegations made by the second respondent in the complaint and, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, this is a fit case for exercise of power under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 4. In the circumstances, I pass following order:- (a) Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a); (b) The Trial Court and all concerned to act on an ordinary copy of this order duly authenticated by Registry of this Court; (c) It is made clear that the proceedings are quashed only as against present applicants. ((-3-)) (A.S.OKA, J.)