VI1 © <-3TT7 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.fSlNo. ^V& of 2010 PETITIONER Adhin Ram Sahu, aged bout 50 years, S/o Shri Sugriv Sahu, Assistant Teacher, Government Middle School, Kallu Banjari, Block- Chhuriya, District-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: ."s^ ,G ^: ^vo..<"^ ...••* '.%1';..--"" •^ ^^^^ ..^^y"" ?^y ...'''" ^^ ^y" State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Block Education Officer Block - Chhuriya District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ ^) ~ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Allllt PETiTiONER WRIT PETiTION {S) No. 1510 of2010 : Adhin Ram Sahu. VERSUS RESPONDENTS :i State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITiON UNDER ARTiCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Aanshotri. J. Present; Shri Gautam Khetrapai, Advocate for the petitionei9'. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State/respondents, ORDER (ORAU (Passed on 08th day of April, 2010) 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a diiection to the respondents to pay two advance increments on passing of B.Ed examination, on his own expenses, before entering jnto service. 2. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submite that the Issue involved in the present case Is no longer res /m^raBS the same has been considered and decided by the Supreme Court in Aslia Saxena K ofM.P. & Ors1 as wei! as by this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj v. Municipal CorpofBtlon, Durg & anothei2 ano' Gopesh Kumar Verma v. The State Govt of ChhaWsgarh andanothe^.. 3. Learned coynsel further submite that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision as aforqstated. Thus, ttie petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondent authorities to dedde his case for grant of two increments in the ilght of aforestated decision, subject to veriflcation of th8 fact asto whether the petitfoner has acquired B.Ed. certificate on hjs own expenses before entering into servjce. 4. Learned counsei appearing ibr the State/respondents submlts that in the event, the petjtioner makes a representation, the same wiii be considered and decided, in accordance with law and in the llght of tfie decisions of the Supreme Court in Astsa Saxena (supra) as wei! as this Court in Yashwant Kumar Bhamdwaj and Gop^h Kumar Verma (supfa), within a period of four weeks froni the date of receipt of the represenlBtlon. 5. In vle^v of foregoing, according to the jearned counsel appearing for the petltioners, nothing survives in this petition foradjudicatfon. 6. Accordingiy, the writ petition ss disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnibotn Judge 120Q9(iII)MPJP.(SC)59 2 2006 (II) MPJR.-CG 96 3WP(S)No.4130of2005