CWP No.2377 of 2011 07.05.2011 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. J. S. Rana, Asstt. A. G. for respondents No.1 to 3 Mr. Mohd. Sharif, B.E.O., Paonta Sahib and Ms. Premlata, Centre Head Teacher, G.P.S. Khoronwala, are present along with the records. Records perused and returned. 2. Petitioner has prayed mainly for the following reliefs:- “a) A writ in the nature of certiorari may be issued and thereby quash the order of transfer dated 4-3-2011 Annexure P-1 b) A writ in the nature of mandamus may be issued and thereby directing the respondent No.3 to allow the petitioner to work in Govt. Primary School, Khoronwala Paonta Sahib Distt. Sirmaur H.P.” 3. It is the petitioner’s contention that he stands transferred from G.P.S. Khoronwala to G.P.S. Naya Pab, Shimla, in terms of order dated 4.3.2011 (Annexure P-1), to accommodate private respondent Smt. Anoop Rani, who was in fact transferred from G.P.S. Shivpur under transfer Kheel to G.P.S. Khoronwala vide order dated 23.10.2010 (Annexure P-II). 4. This fact is seriously refuted by the official present in the Court. From the records produced, it is evident that Anoop Rani had joined G.P.S. Khoronwala, pursuant to Annexure P-II on 23.10.2010 itself. This was much prior to the passing of the impugned order. Petitioner’s contention that his transfer is at the behest of Anoop Rani is also refuted. Smt. Anoop Rani was actually adjusted against the vacancy which had arisen subsequent to the promotion of another teacher i.e. Smt. Veena, which also took place in October, 2010. 5. Consequently, the stand taken by the petitioner stands falsified. 5. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, there are six posts of teachers at G.P.S. Khoronwala and only five teachers are posted there. Mr. J. S. Rana, learned Asstt. Advocate General refutes this fact. According to him, after rationalization of the teachers, by taking into account the strength of the students in the school, there are only five posts. It is open for the petitioner to approach respondent No.2/3 setting out his grievance in detail. It is expected of the said respondent to consider the petitioner’s grievance and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation. Interim order vacated. With the aforesaid observations, petition stands disposed of. Copy dasti. ( Sanjay Karol) Judge May 07, 2011 (rana)