18b cr appa 1104-10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1104 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 651 OF 2010 Maniksab Alisab Multani & Ors .. Applicants Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. S.R. Borulkar i/b Mr. Amit A. Karande for the Applicants Mr. V.B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the State CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J DATE : 16th SEPTEMBER,2010. P.C.: 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicants and learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants-original accused nos. 1 to 4 have been convicted under Sections 365 & 342 read with 34 of IPC and sentenced to suffer RI for five years. The appeal preferred by them against the said order has been admitted. Now, the applicants are seeking bail. 3. Learned advocate for the applicants stated that besides this case, the applicants have a clean record. He further stated that the applicants were on bail during the trial and they have not misused the liberty granted to them. 1 18b cr appa 1104-10.doc Both these statements have not been controverted by learned APP. 4. Learned advocate for the applicants submitted that there was some matrimonial dispute between the daughter of applicant no. 1 and her husband Yasin i.e son of complainant and the present C.R. has arisen out of said matrimonial dispute due to which complaint came to be lodged by father of Yasin against the applicants. 5. Looking to all above facts, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicants. Hence, the order: O R D E R 1. Applicant nos. 1 to 4 i.e 1. Maniksab Alisab Multani, 2. Ismail Balasaheb Ankali, 3. Rafiq Maniksab Multani and 4. Salim Maniksab Multani be released on bail in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- [Rs. Twenty Five Thousand Only] each with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The Applicant shall report to the Gadhinglaj Police Station once in a month till disposal of the appeal. 2. Application is allowed in above terms. [SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] 2 18b cr appa 1104-10.doc 3