CW 13289/09 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.13289/2009 Deepak Mathur Versus RCSAT & Others Date of Order ::: 24/10//09 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Ashok Kr. Bansal, for petitioner Petitioner while working as Technician in Government Polytechnic College, Jodhpur was transferred to Khetan Polytechnic College, Jaipur vide order dt.25/09/09 (Ann.7) which was assailed in Appeal-906/2009 but the same was rejected by the Tribunal vide judgment dt.13/10/09 (Ann.9). His grievance is that he has hardly worked after having joined on his transfer vide order dt.12/07/07 (Ann.1) for two years in Polytechnic College, Jodhpur, from where now he has been transferred to Jaipur vide order impugned; and that apart, his wife is also working at Jodhpur in Department of Education and it has remained the Government policy that as far as possible, both the spouses should ordinarily remain posted at one station while passing orders of transfer, which is being violated by State Government vide order impugned. However, it is always expected from the authority that when spouses are working in the CW 13289/09 //2// Government service, it has always to be looked into that they remain posted at one station and such a policy introduced by State Government has certainly a laudable object because if the spouses remain posted at one station, they may serve the department effectively and maintain their family, as well. In instant case, petitioner remained posted at Jodhpur for last two years on his earlier transfer vide order dt.12/07/07 (Ann.1) and if at all there are administrative reasons, one can certainly be shifted but in the interest of administration or exigency of service. After examining material on record, learned Tribunal did not find favour with order of transfer impugned herein. It is not the case of petitioner that there are allegations being imputed of motive on the part of authority which has passed the order of his transfer nor it is his case for alleging violation of statutory rules; and as observed (supra), has alleged about his family circumstances which are always to be looked into while taking decision transferring employees. Certainly these are considerations being within the domain of administrative authority and not for this Court to appreciate and examine in its limited scope of judicial review in exercise of CW 13289/09 //3// jurisdiction U/Art.226 of the Constitution. However, this Court considers it proper to direct the petitioner to apprise the authority about his personal circumstances by fresh representation; if submitted, it is always expected from the authority to examine it objectively and take decision within three weeks of fresh representation. With the observations (supra), writ petition stands disposed of. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p.3/ 13289CW09Oct24-DsTrns.doc