("Fr' /'T5S>1^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPU^ CHHATTISGARH W. P.(S) N0.'^^•-^./2006 PETmONER ..f'''., ^•^t> ^y^eQ-^' ^^t^ J^I®:-""'" ^•^^fey"" ,s" <?'"^.^'^ .».e'!>,.••" RESPONDENT -co^ ^^>^,^ ^ (S^^ll^^^ ^1 ^:.^ Chatrapal Puri Goswami S/o Late Shri Kailash Puri Goswami Ageabout 44 years,Asstt. Teacher Govt. Primary School, Kawardha Viltage - Dubha, Btock- Kawardha Distt-KabJrdham(C.G.) VERSUS State Govt. ofChhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur(C.G.) DistrictEducation Officer Kawardha, District-Kabirdham (C.G.) Block Education Officer Kawardha Block Office Kawardha Disstt.-Kabirdham (C.G.) u WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI.HC-78 3sr^pn?pr^ ®^t<i'is,Ridi'yy *fl*1MI Sh+<|ct» " <0f} V^ 200 311^1 4tiq> (l{o|}^s|^8T) 3n^rwR-ii'*i (IWail^TBITRi ^ Roshan \~?c 28.8,2006 STBTW Hfer 3TI^?T ^rafe^r imcff ff fei^i' ^Srf^tTSn^T' Shri Sa-nkant Verma, counsel ^or the petittoner. Shri Vinay Pandey, P.L. for th^ State on advance oopy. Heard. The case of the petitioner is tt-fat he is working as Assistant Teacher and as per the Instfuction dated 24-12-98 Teaohere who have passed B. T.1., issued by the State of M.P., the Assistant B.Ed. and M.Ed. examination on their own expenses after 22-10-64 are entitled) fortwo advance increments. The petitioner passed the B. T.1. examination on his jwn cost in the year 1992 and a certtflcate to that efiect is Annexure-P-3, but frie whereas, similarly situated persons under the ordere of the Tribunal and Vr, Hawng heard learned counsel petitioner has not been given the benefit, tave been granted two advance increments lis Court. Tor the parties, having regard to the facts and the petitioner is allowed to make a d today and in tum, respondent No.2 is| in the light of averments made bi] oircumstancss of the oase, without ext?ressing any opinion of the merit of the case, •tailed pepresentetion atong with copy of this petition raising all his grievances to re^pondent No.2 within a period of 1S days from yireoted to examine the case of the petitioner the petitioner in this petition and in tte representation aiso. If respondent N|o.2 reaohes to the conctuston that similarly situated persons have been grantedl benefit of two advance increments and the petitioner's case is also covered for gr^nt of two advanoe inoremerts on the tsaste oF Government's order, then to pass ord^re within a period of 3 morrths ftom today, in aocordanee with law. With the direotion aforesaid, th' Parties are entitled for oertifled ^ petition stancfs disposed of. lcopyofthisorder. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge P.T.O. y