Civil Revision No.6126 of 2010(O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Civil Revision No.6126 of 2010(O&M) Decided on : February 24, 2011 Paramjit Kaur and others ... Petitioners VERSUS Gurmeet Singh and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Raman Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.K.K.Saini, Advocate for the respondents. A.N.JINDAL, J.- The plaintiff – petitioners (herein referred as `the petitioners') by way of filing an application for secondary evidence have sought permission to prove a photocopy of a compromise dated 3.7.1996, purported to have been prepared in the police station, which was allegedly destroyed. Heard. It is a suit for possession by way of partition, which is pending since 12.12.2002. The alleged compromise has not been averred in the plaint. No issue with regard to compromise has been framed. Even the witnesses of the petitioners; either the plaintiff Paramjit Kaur herself or another witness Naranjan Singh have stated anything about the alleged Civil Revision No.6126 of 2010(O&M) [ 2 ] agreement. Admittedly, except a photocopy of the agreement, no supporting document to prove the same, is in existence. The counsel for the petitioners has not disclosed as to how the alleged agreement is relevant in a suit for partition. Thus, the application appears to be a bid on the part of the petitioners to prolong the litigation. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. February 24, 2011 ( A.N.JINDAL ) `gian' JUDGE