IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.8293/2010 Date of decision: 17.10.2011. Gurbachan Singh ....................Petitioner v. Gurdas Singh .....................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present: Mr.Raj Kumar Gupta,Advocate for the petitioner. Jaswant Singh.J.(Oral) CM No.32216-CII/2010 allowed. Delay of 27 days in re- filing the revision petition is condoned. Defendant-Gurbachan Singh has filed the present revision petition under Section 115 CPC assailing the judgement and decree dated 30.3.2010 whereby a suit for recovery of a loan amount of Rs.15,000/- alongwith interest @ 1.56% per month has been decreed; further prayer is for setting aside the appellate judgement and decree dated 8.6.2010 whereby the appeal has also been dismissed by the learned District Judge, Patiala. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I find no ground to interfere with the findings recorded by both the courts below. It is apparent that the suit by respondent-plaintiff-Gurdas Singh was filed for recovery of loan amount of Rs.15,000/- as per pronote dated 12.5.2004 (Ex.P1) and receipt of even date (Ex.P2) on non-repayment of the loan by the defendant-petitioner. On the basis of evidence adduced by the parties both the courts have found that the plaintiff on the basis of the testimony of PW1-plaintiff; PW2-Scribe Naresh Kumar and PW3-Arvinder Singh attesting witness has been able to fully prove the due execution of the pronote. The petitioner-defendant has not been able to lead any evidence in support of his plea that the pronote Ex.P1 and receipt Ex.P2 were a result of fraud and cheating. In fact both the courts below have noticed that the defendant-petitioner had admitted in his cross examination his signatures on both Ex.P1 and P2. In view of the established and concurrent findings of fact recorded by the courts below, I find no ground to interfere in exercise of revisional jurisdiction of this court. Dismissed. 17.10.2011 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge