IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22554 of 2010 GHULAM WARIS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 29.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Admittedly, no incriminating article showing the bad conduct or antecedent of the petitioner has been recovered from his conscious possession and it is simply stated that three mobile, some Nepali currency and one passport of Napal was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Furthermore, it is apparent from the F.I.R. itself that at the time of his arrest, petitioner had disclosed this fact that he had taken education in Pakistan and he is resident of Kathmandu. Furthermore, the petitioner disclosed this fact that he has married with girl of Katihar. This Court had called for a report from S.P., Katihar, about the antecedent of the in-laws of the petitioner. Officer-in-charge of Town Police Station, Katihar has reported vide his memo no.239 2 of 2010 dated 31.09.2010 that the in-laws of the petitioner do not have any criminal antecedent. The investigation of this case has already been completed. In the aforesaid circumstance petitioner, namely, Ghulam Waris, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in connection with Katihar P.S. Case No.76 of 2010, subject to condition that one of the sureties must be father-in-law of the petitioner. PN ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)