IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27160 of 2008 DINA GOPE Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 23.9.2008 Heard. The allegation is that the son of the informant was called out and was taken towards a river and it is further alleged that this petitioner when the boy had been taken to the river side gave an iron rod blow on his head whereas accused Upendra Yadav and Chhathu Yadav also dealt blows with the same weapon upon him. Other accused persons are alleged to have picked up the boy and to have thrown him in the river stream. It is not disputed that the boy is still traceless. The contention is that the case has been found true only under Section 364A IPC and there are improbable inheritance appearing in the case inasmuch as none including the informant could intervene to save the boy. It is furtrher contended that the petitioner is in custody since 20.11.2007. The allegations are direct against the petitioner and simply because the dead body or the corpse and it could not be a case under Section 364A IPC. However, this matter to be dealt with the trial court at the appropriate stage of the case and considering the allegation and nature thereof, I am not inclined to direct the release of the petitioner on bail. Petition is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )