-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISIDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.105 OF 2004 Shri.Balkrishna Puri and Ors. ...Petitioners Vs. Mrs.Rajshree Shitalkumar Kadam and Ors. ...Respondents .... Mr.S.M.Oak with Ambar Joshi for Petitioners .... CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. DATE : JANUARY 24,2005 DATE : JANUARY 24,2005 DATE : JANUARY 24,2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr.Oak, the learned counsel for the petitioners who had approached the Industrial Court at Thane in Complaint (ULP) NO. 232 of 2004 and prayed for being impleaded as respondents. The said application at Exhibit-UA-2 has been rejected by the learned Member by the impugned order dated 8th December, 2004. 2. The reasoning given by the Industrial Court in para nos. 6 and 7 of the impugned order cannot be faulted with and in any case, the present petitioners are not estopped from moving the Industrial Court or any appropriate forum challenging the promotions to the posts of senior clerks and it is therefore, -2- clarified that the rejection of their application by the impugned order, would not come in their way in initiating the appropriate proceedings. 3. Save and except the above observations, the petition stands rejected. [ B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. ]