BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR (C.G.l In the matterofW.P.No.5ee6 2003 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^^^. ^' A»v* .%^%»^ ^^^ ^*" a^TO Ghanshyam Sahu, A^ed about 36 years, S/o Jgman Sahu, R/o Grain Pandripani <s\ Tahsil Gariaband, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chliattisgarh Through Secretary Principle Secretary Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur. CoUector, Raipur S.D.0. Gariyaband, Distt. Raipur. Puniya, Bai, Aged about 60 years D/o Tikait Gond Village Pandripni Gariyabandh, Distt. Raipur. 2. 3. 4. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARIOR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKENATURE —78 sn%v ~w K;-<i+ wr SIT^T siniN; HI*IMI **ira» :s^ •<ii'4i<?iA|, si-al'M'is, f°<<'fiyi^< _^ W'f-/Vi,. ^o6/°^ " w^^ee- 3II^TTra^7 (ipfgq^q) TOiiwntoian^r <*i<<l<'ii1't ~v^\'? fs<S Tfe^re ^r sffgir ati^r S.B. Hon'Me SbriJusBce Prashdnt Kunsir Mistura 28.09.2010. None for Uie pe*iti<»iCT. Shri R.R. Sinha, Panel Law^er Tor the Stete/responelents No. 1to3. | Ttw matter we® passed |over oiwe in atesence of any r^resentation on behatf of the pe^toner. No one appearsforthepet^ww even in the secondtaU.^ (n the cireumstances, er^ is no othw o^on left swth the Court but to dismiss tiw writ petttK^i ftK- want of prosecutton. The petition is dismissed foifwant of proseciAion; Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge