Crl. W. P. No. 1198 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. W. P. No. 1198 of 2009 Date of Decision : November 28, 2009 Satnam Kaur .... Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : None for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG, Punjab. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Application sent by post by Satnam Kaur to Hon'ble the Chief Justice of this Court has been registered as instant Criminal Writ Petition. It has been alleged in the application that petitioner's father used to beat petitioner's mother Jaswinder Kaur, who, therefore, lost her mental balance. Petitioner's mother left her house on 03.10.2009. Missing report was lodged on 05.10.2009 in Police Post Pasiana. Petitioner's mother was found wandering in Patiala City by police party. After interrogation, she was handed over to Police Post Pasiana. Police accordingly informed the petitioner, who went to the Police Post. However, Avtar Singh, Mani and Rani reached there and gave beatings to the petitioner and forcibly took away the petitioner's mother on a motorcycle. The aforesaid persons also threatened the petitioner. There are some other allegations also regarding Crl. W. P. No. 1198 of 2009 2 attempt to grab ancestral property of the petitioner. Notice issued to the petitioner directing her to file affidavit in support of the averments made in the application has not been received back served or otherwise. In reply filed on behalf of State of Punjab, it has been stated that the petitioner made statement (Annexure R-1) before Head Constable Narata Ram on 19.11.2009 that the petitioner did not want to pursue the instant writ petition because her mother Jaswinder Kaur was now living peacefully in the village. The allegations made in paragraph 4 of the application regarding beating of petitioner and taking away of her mother forcibly by Avtar Singh etc. were not proved during inquiry. The petitioner, as per her statement, had taken back her mother on 14.10.2009 and thereafter, there was some dispute between her and her uncle Avtar Singh etc. and therefore, their names were mentioned in the application. In view of the aforesaid, no further action or direction is required in the instant writ petition, which is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. November 28, 2009 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE