1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 4447/2009. ( Sheikh Nannu Sk. Moinuddin -: versus :- State of Maharashtra and others ) WRIT PETITION No. 4467/2009. ( Jaishree V. Jadhav -: versus :- State of Maharashtra and others ) WRIT PETITION No. 4466/2009. ( Vijay D. Bankinwar -: versus :- State of Maharashtra and others ) WRIT PETITION No. 4457/2009. ( Mohd. Hasan Sk. Jafar -: versus :- State of Maharashtra and others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 11, 2009. Heard Shri F.T. Mirza, learned counsel for petitioners and learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 to 3. Learned counsel for petitioner is assailing the orders dated 07.09.2007 and 13.11.2007. However, during arguments, it has transpired that petitioner has already filed Revision before the State Government and one of the grievance is that, that revision is pending since January, 2008 without any progress. Learned counsel further states that in that respect on earlier occasion this Court has sought information from learned A.G.P. about the time within which the revisions can be disposed of. Learned A.G.P. today states that because of elections and subsequent developments, he could not receive 2 the instructions till date. He therefore, seeks more time to make appropriate statement. However, his request is rejected. Respondent no.1 State Government is directed to decide the pending revisions as early as possible and in any case by 15.01.2010. Shri Mirza, learned counsel has pointed out that the Session at Nagpur is likely to be held from 7th or 8th December, 2009. He therefore, request that hearing may be taken at Nagpur only. Learned A.G.P. is not in a position to make any statement. However, considering the fact, State Government to find out if the matters can be heard at Nagpur so as not to cause any inconvenience to the petitioners and their Advocates. With these direction, Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs. Copy of this order be furnished to learned A.G.P. to act upon. JUDGE Rgd.