1 sa 169.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 169 OF 2011 Syyad Abdul Rehman Sayyad .. Appellant Versus Gangadhar Shankarrao Bansode .. Respondent Shri Dastagir, Advocate h/f Shri G. D. Shaikh, Advocate for the Appellant. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 13TH APRIL, 2011. PER COURT : . The original defendant has filed the present second appeal. The present respondent had filed a suit for possession and recovery of arrears of rent purportedly under the provisions of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act. The suit was filed by the plaintiff on the ground that the defendant is the tenant on the suit property and the plaintiff requires the same for his bonafide need and the defendant is in arrears of rent. The Trial Court decreed the suit. The defendant preferred an appeal. The Appellate Court also dismissed the appeal. 2 sa 169.11 2. In view of Sec. 34 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, the judgment and the decree of District Court is final and no second appeal lies against the said judgment. 3. Shri Dastagir, the learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the second appeal with liberty to file an appropriate proceedings. 4. In the light of above, the second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appropriate proceedings against the impugned judgment and decree. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/April 11