-^ c'F \av. ^J^ .^1;^^ ^i^t^ g^ ^st^^^t IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS1 N0. f 1-37-OF 2007 PETITIOJMER : ^s (^'•'J .r" / ./..^y .^/•/ 'Chandrawati Das wife of Sudeshwar Prasad, aged about 28 years, Occupation- "Sah-Sahayeeka" J\ngan Badi, Nutrition and Food Distribution Centfff/f R/o Village- Purandeeh Sarnadeeh Post-Balrampur, District Sarguja (C.G.) ^.^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. -00^ State of Chhattisgarh, through: the Secretary, Department of Women and Child Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). c'?^^rs ^ ^^ „ G.^u'2. The District Coltector, Sarguja (C.G.) 1" 3. District Programme Officer, Women and Child Welfare District Sarguja (C.G.) 4. Pushpa Singh wife of Mahendra Singh, aged about 31 years, R/o Sarnadeeh, Post- Balrampur, District Sarguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226'OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY, MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION ETC. p A r^T-T/-<uj_A^n.<-< r'lkC-.-F-i t r- .ru-.TLT^iiT^an.i.r-.Fa. HiGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (s) No, 1232 of 2007 Petitioner Respondeuts Versus Chaadrstmati Das State of ChhattisgaA & otfaers SB: Hon'blc Mr. Justicc gatist K. Agnihofai, J Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Vinay Pa&dey Panel Lawryer for the respondents No. l to 4. »•— Tbakur O R DB R (Passed on this Ist day ofMarch, 2007} By this petition, the petitioner chaUenges the vaMity of the order dated 11.1.2007 (Aanexure P/l) passed by the respoadent No.3, whereby fhe respondeat No.4 has bcea selected aud appotated on th.e post of Aa&ganwadi Worker at vfllage Puraadeli, Distdct - Surguja. Learaed counsel appeariag for fhe petttioner submits that fhe selection and appointment oftfae reapondent No.4 is contrary to the directions contained in the order dated 10.4.2006 (Annexure P/4) issued by the Women aad Child Development Department, State of Chhattisgarh. He furfher subinits &at as fhe petitioner is already working on the post of Sah Sahayika vide appointment order dated 29,10.2004 (Annexurc P/2), therefore, she has preferential right to be appointed as Anganbadi Worker, over the respondent No.4. In view ofthe above, without expressmg any opiiiioa oa facts as weU as on merit, the CoBector, Suiguja is directed to look into the aBegation made by fhe petitioaer aad pass appropriate order m. accordance wifh. Aanganwadi Scheaae and ]aw. The writ petitioD. is accQidingly disposed of. No order as to coste. Coasequently, M(W)P No. 832/2007 standa disposed o£ Sd/- Satish K:AgHi'Jiotri Judge