\ (L-^Y^. S1N61E BfNCH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. 6^> / 2011 PETITIONER ^ / ;'z/*"..-:'^--;'" ...••••" VA> ...-••^n^-^A..--" 'A'1'"'..,.-.1" ^Y.->·" '".^s'"9^->" .t-^ RESPONDENTS Smt. Darshana Madne W/o Shri ^ Prakash Madne, Aged about 50 years, Oecupation - Lecturer, Govt. Girls Higher Secondary School Vaishali Nagar Bhilai Distt. Durg (CG). VERSUS 1. StateofChhattisgarh, ThroMgh - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^^ HIGHCOURTOFCHHAfTISGARH.BILASPUR INGLE BENCH : HON'BLESHRIPRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA. J. W.P.(SlNo.523of2011 PETITIONER Smt. Darshana Madne. Versus RESPONDENTS State ofChhattisgarh and others. WRIT PtTiTiON UNDERARTICLE 22S OF THE CONSTiTUTION OF INDIA. Shri Vipin Tiwari, counsei for petitioner. Shrl Yashwant Singh, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ORALORDER (31/01/2011) Following oral order Prashant Kumar Mishra. J. Heard. of the Court was passed by (2) Lsarned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitted to benefit of two advance increments on account of she having passsd B.Ed. examination before her appointment at her own cost. it is submitted that the issue involved in the present petition is no longer res OTfegra and the same has been finally decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena vs. State of M.P. &0rs., reported in 2009 (III) MPJRfSC) 59. (3) It isfurther submitted thatthis Court has also taken a simiiarview in its order dated 06/02/20Q9 passed in W.P. (S) No. 6257 of 2008. Learned counsel forthepetitionerfurtherdrawsattention ofthisCourtto orderdated 29/04/2010 passed in Writ Appeal No. 124 of 2009. wherein relying ypon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena (supra)and the order passed by this Cpurt in another WJt Appeal No. 87/2009, directiQns have been issued for consideration Qfthe case for grant of two advance increments as per circular dated ^1/09/1974 issued bythe State of Madhya Pradesh, after verificatiQn of 'the facts pleaded in the petition. -2^ (4) Learned counsel for the respondents submits that case of the petitioner would also be considered on the same lines. (5) In view of the statement made above, this petition is finally disposed off with a direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner for grant of two advance increment as percircular dated 21/09/1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verificaiion ofthe facts pleaded in thepetition within a period ofeight weeks frorn today. Sd//- prashant Kumar Mishra Judge