BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the First day of June Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.6523 of 2011 SATHISH ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.5 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOODALPUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.209/2011 ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.ARUN KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324 and 307 I.P.C. in Crime No.209 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police, the petitioner has approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Heard Mr.M.Arunkumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Ms.S.Prabha, learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is ranked as A5 and the other accused have already been granted anticipatory bail by the learned Sessions Judge and there is no overt act stated against the petitioner and therefore, he may be granted anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit in her argument that the lower Court had mentioned in its order that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and the injuries were also simple. Based upon such findings, necessary condition may be imposed for the secured presence of the petitioner. 5. Considering the submissions made by both sides, this Court could see that the lower Court has referred in its order that the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ injured has already been discharged from the hospital and the injuries were also simple and on that basis, granted anticipatory bail to the other accused, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Madurai and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 01/06/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV, MADURAI. 2 -Do-Thro' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOODALPUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S. M.ARUN KUMAR Advocate SR.No.17038 akm/02.06.11 /2p-6c/ ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.6523 of 2011 Date :01/06/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/