1 Cri. W.P. 134.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 134 OF 2010 [Varad Fertilizers Ltd. Through Power of attorney Shri Bandu Vithal Jiwde Vs. Ashish Trader through its proprietor Ashok Kasade and another] Smt.Kalpalata Patil Bharaswadkar,Advocate for petitioner Mr.D.R.Korde,A.P.P.for respondent No.2 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders 1] This Criminal Writ petition is challenging the impugned Judgment and order dated 12th October,2009 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jalna in Criminal Revision No.93 of 2008. The learned Sessions Judge took a view that the Revision against the order of dismissal of the complaint and the acquittal of the respondent-accused is not maintainable, because remedy to file an Appeal against the dismissal of the complaint and the acquittal is available. This view is correct and is based on the Judgments of this Court. 2 Cri. W.P. 134.10 2] There is no scope for the petitioner to come before this Court. Thus, the Criminal Writ Petition is dismissed. 3] As indicated above, the petitioner has still liberty to file an Appeal against the dismissal of complaint and acquittal of the respondent-accused. Sd/- DT.: 24.03.2010 [A.V.NIRGUDE,J.] MTK