IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.237 of 2009 M/S A K ENTERPRISES Versus THE STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. ----------- 3/ 16.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Bank. The petitioner seeks modification of order dated 18.08.2009 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 9718 of 2009. This Court in its order dated 18.08.2009 has observed that the petitioner should avail statutory remedy under section 31 of the Debts Due to Bank and Financial Institution Act, 1993, which has wrongly been typed as 31 A. Learned counsel submits that neither application was entertained nor any payment was accepted. He further submits that in fact the cheque deposited by him did not bounce. After hearing the counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that in case, the petitioner feels aggrieved by any action of the respondent, it would be at liberty to move appropriate application before an appropriate forum. With the aforesaid liberty, this application is disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)