459’ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition j S) N0. 221 01'2008 PETITIONERS : 1. Santosh Kumar Kesharwani S/o Shri Hari Prasad Kesharwani, Age about 47 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Prim. School, Jaldapara (Khongsara), Block Kota§ DistL Bilaspur (CG). 2. Shiyodhan Prasad Kaushik S/o Shri Atma Ram Kaushik, Age about 48 years, Assn. Teacher, T.W.D. Primary School, Jogipur Block Kota, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Education & Tribal Welfare Department DKS Bhawm; Raipur (CG) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal & Welfare Department, Distt. Bilaspur (CG), 3. District Education Officer, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). (VVRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TI—DE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon‘ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 14‘“ orJanuary, 2003) . Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the Stateirespondents jointly submits that the fact and question of law involved in the present Writ Petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kmnar Bhardwaj Vs, Municipal Coizmration, Burg and another {2096(11) M?JR-CG96}, which has been disposed of Vide order dated 03.04.2006, . Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. Municiyal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the facts asto whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed Examination Certificate on their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and thither whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order asto costs. ‘ Satish K. Agnihnxri Judge ll i Sd/- i l l Sahu Present : Sln'i Somkant Venna, Advocate for the petitioners.