Cr. Revision No.12/2003 2.06.2009 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General for the respondent-State. Complainant Smt. Tara Devi in person. Cr. Revision No.12/2003 and Cr. M.P No.291/2009 Revision petitioner has been convicted of offence, punishable under Sections 341, 354 and 506 IPC by the trial Court and his conviction and sentence have been affirmed by the appellate Court, i.e., the Court of Additional Sessions Judge. He has now filed revision in this Court. The lady, who had been allegedly assaulted by the revision petitioner, is stated to have compounded the offences with the revision petitioner. Application (Cr. MP No.291 of 2009) has been moved, seeking leave of the Court to compound the offences, because in view of the provision of sub-section (6) of Section 320 Cr. P.C, Court’s permission is required when the matter is pending with the Revisional Court. It is stated in the application that with the intervention of the family members of the two parties, the parties have decided to burry the hatchet. Affidavits of both the complainant-lady and the revision petitioner have been filed with the application. Hence, the application is allowed and the parties are permitted to compound the offences. Today the complainant, accompanied by her husband, and the revision petitioner, are present in person. Statement of the complainant has been recorded, separately. As per said statement, she has compounded the offences with the petitioner. In view of the above stated position, the present revision petition is allowed. Judgment of the trial Court convicting and sentencing the revision petitioner of offences, under Sections 341, 354 and 506 IPC as also the judgment of the appellate Court affirming the judgment of the trial - 2 – Court are set aside and the revision petitioner is acquitted. Matter is disposed of accordingly. June 2, 2009 (ss) ( Surjit Singh ), J.