IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11345 of 2007 Mosomat Smt.Jayshree Devi @Jai Devi wife of Late Sri Arjun Prasad Sahu, resident of village-Abjuganj( Sultanganj), P.S. Sultanganj, District- Bhagalpur ------------------- Petitioner Versus 1.The Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University through its Vice Chancellor 2.The Vice-Chancellor, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 3.The Registrar, T.M.Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 4.The Finance Officer, T.M.Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 5.The Principal, Murarka College, Sultanganj, Bhagalpur --------------------------- Respondents. ----------- 11 08-07-2011 Heard Sri Radha Raman Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent/ Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University. The writ petition was initially filed with a prayer to direct the Respondents to release death-cum- retiral dues of the husband of the petitioner. In this case, number of affidavits have been filed on behalf of the University. Along with 5th counter affidavit, an order dated 14.02.2009 passed by the Registrar of the University has been brought on record as Annexure-D. Learned counsel for the University in view of order dated 14.02.2009 (Annexure-D) passed by the Registrar of the University submits that it appears that almost all the grievances of the petitioner have been redressed. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out from annexure-D that some amount in respect of difference of salary was outstanding on the date of order i.e. order dated 14.02.2009. However, neither the learned counsel for the petitioner nor learned counsel for the University is sure as to whether the said amount was paid or not. In view of the facts and circumstances, particularly the fact that most of the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed, 2 there is no need to keep the matter further pending. The writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the authority concerned, if still as per Annexure-D to the 5th counter affidavit, something is outstanding. If such representation is filed before Respondent no.2/ Vice-Chancellor , Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur , the Court expects that Respondent no.2 will examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. If Respondent no.2 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J. )