1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 592 OF 2003 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3059 OF 2003 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 592 OF 2003 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 211 OF 1959 Rohini D. Sidpra ... Petitioner. vs. Mrs. Freny D. Sidpra & Anr. .. Respondents. WITH NOTICE OF; MOTION NO. 3099 OF 2003 IN MISC. APPLN. (L) NO. 2 OF 2001 IN MISC. PETITION NO. 24 OF 1997 IN T.P. NO. 211 OF 1959 Rohini D. Sidpra ... Applicant. vs. Mrs. Freny D. Sidpra & Anr. .. Respondents. None for the petitioner. 2 Ms. H.I. Advani i/by S.A. Raj for Respondent No. 2. CORAM : S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 15TH JULY, 2005. P.C. . In spite of various adjournments nobody is appearing for the petitioner. One earlier occasion one Ms. Smita Patel filed a letter inter alia stating therein that she has been informed by the petitioner to inform the Court that she is at present in Delhi and, therefore, cannot attend the Court. Ms. Smita Patel in the present case is neither an advocate nor any authorised person. Pursuant to my order dated 16.6.2005, notice is served on the petitioner. In spite of that, the petitioner is not present in the Court. The letter of Ms. Smita Patel cannot be taken cognizance of. In the aforesaid circumstances, the motion is dismissed.