IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12054 of 2008 VIJAY TANTI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 11/07/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel representing the State and counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. Supplementary affidavit has been filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Initially a complaint case was filed by Adhiklal Mahto that his minor daughter aged about 13 years was enticed away by the accused persons including the petitioner. Allegation is that the girl had eloped and on search she was not traced out then it was suspected that she was taken away. Submission is that the alleged victim has already married with Chintu Tanti. The marriage was performed in Arya Samaj Mandir at New Delhi for which a certificate has been produced by filing supplementary affidavit. Further submission is that the entire allegation is against Chintu Tanti who was working as tutor of the victim. The petitioner has been roped in because he happens to be the relative of main accused. Learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail and stated that the victim has not yet been traced out. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Vijay Tanti is directed to be released on bail on furnishing - 2 - of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Begusarai in connection with Balia P.S. Case No. 188 of 2007. avin. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)