IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.15390 OF 2010 DATE OF DECISION: MAY 13 ,2011 Sunehri Devi .....Petitioner VERSUS Haryana Urban Development Authority, Panchkula and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate, for the respondents. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has been offered an alternative plot, possession of which she has taken. In the facts and circumstances of the case, no case for any direction to allow interest to the petitioner on the amount, which she deposited initially for allotment of plot is made out. Dismissed. May 13,2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE