IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYAN AT CHANDIGARH CM 5708-09-C of 2006 and R.S.A. No. 2401 of 2006 Date of decision: January 30,2007 Mani Ram V. Bhura and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL Present: Shri Rajeev Godara, ,Advocate, for the appellant. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral) For the reasons given in the applications, the delay in filing and refiling the present appeal is condoned. RSA No.2401 of 2006 Plaintiff is the appellant before this court. He has lost before the two courts below in his claim for possession. Both the courts below have held that plaintiff has failed to prove that he is owner of the portion of the suit land, which he claimed that the defendants unauthorisedly and illegally had encroached upon. Consequently, the suit filed by the plaintiff has been dismissed and his appeal has failed before the first appellate court. Nothing has been shown that the findings recorded by the two Courts below suffer from any infirmity or are contrary to the record. No question of law, much less any substantial question of law, arises in the present appeal. Dismissed. January 30,2007 ( Viney Mittal ) sks Judge