IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.171 of 2007 DWARIKA DHISH PANDEY @ DWARIK DHISH PANDEYA Versus RAM PRATAP SINGH ----------- 2 28/11/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner with reference to the impugned order would submit that the subsequent to the order dated 1.12.2006 the petitioner under the capacity of plaintiff has already produced original sale deed on 29.1.2008 which has been marked as Ext.2. In that view of the matter, scope of the impugned order in this application being confined to production of the aforesaid sale deed, having been complied by the petitioner, this application has become infructuous and is dismissed accordingly. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar