-w- s IN THE HIGH COURTOF CHHA1TISOARH :ajAaPUR Writ Petitioa (S) No. 4640 of2008 Pfetitioner Chliedilal Psmdey, S/o La.te Bhvavesffawas Prasad Pandcy, Aged about 57 years, R/o Daioga Para, Dist—KedgarbiC.Q.) Versus Respondents 1. State of caihatti^arh Thaoug^t dte Secretaiy, Dcpartinent. of GteittOdyoig, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Sanchalak Mandal, CG Govt Khadi & V.I Boari, Raapur (C.G.) 3. Managiiq; Duector, CG Kbad* TatBa Graaiodyog Bomd, Raipur (C.C^ 4. Managpr, CO Ktmdi Ta a QWsaaodyo^ Board Zila Ranch^at Offiee, BtuktHi'tfapiM', Dist - Koria (C.G) 5. CoMector,Koria,Dist-Koria(C.G) WRITJPETITONUNDER AjRTICUi 226 QF THB CONST1TUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. ^tiihotri J.) ShriH. S. Ahluwalia, Advocatefortfae petitioner. Shri P. K. Bhaduri, Panel Lamyer &r ts^e; Eespondeate No. 1 & S. O R D E R (Passed on tliis 2SU> Day ofAugust, 2008) 1. 2. 3. 4. lliakur Leamed counsd appcarin^ for ttae petitkMier, on instrBctions, submits that ti» pctltioner seeks to witltdaaw tl^ p^ition with Uberty to fite a betterpetition, ifsoadviscd. Leamcd couascl appearing for the respoBdeats^State lias no objectiott, It ]3 ordesed aocording.ty. In vicwof fbe aiaovie, tbe petilaai is disaiissed as witlidcawn wifh ttie abovc-stated Mberty. ——7s^—~— Satish K. Agniliotri ., j-3^;_Judge' ; • . ^.