HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BJLASPUR <» DiVSSSON BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRl RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. HON'BLE SHRS SUNSL KUMAR SiNHA, J. ADDlicants Appeti'ants 1»— -^ JVi.C.C. N0. 266 OF 2009 1 Maniram Aditya, S/o Madhoram Aditya, Aged about 45 years, 2 Ku. Ghasnin Aditya, Aged about 18 years, 3 Ku.Mahettin Aditya, Aged about 16 years, Both are D/o Maniram Aditya Minor Appeilant No.3 through her father AppeElant No.1 Maniram Aditya, Ali are permanent R/o Viliage & Post Klkirda, Tahsil Shakti, PS Jaijaipur, District Janjgir - Champa (CG) Present Address Mahmand Road, Lai Khadan Tahsll & Dlstrict Biiaspur (CG) VERSUS Non-apDllcants 1 Parsuram Sharma, S/o Bharat Sharma, Respondents (Drsver) Aged about 45 years, R/o 15 Block, Korba District Korba (CG) 2 Anish Sharma, S/o Mithiiesh Sharma, (Vehicte Owner) Aged about years R/o Transport Nagar, 15 Block, Korba, District Korba (CG) 3 The Branch Manager, The New India Assurance Company Limlted, Korba, District Korba (CG) ApDlication for restoration of M.A. No. 09/2006 dismissed in defaySt pn Q2-07-2809 Present : Shri Ravish Verma, learned counsei for the petitioners. ^^r- ^ ^ ,,: ORDER (24tn July, 2009) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Learned counsei for the petitioners is heard on the restoration petition. 2) The petitloners are seeking restoration of M.A. No.09/2006 which was dlsmissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 02.07.2009. 3) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, we are satisfied that the absence of the petitioners'/appellants' counsei on 02.07.2009, when M.A. No.09/2006 was taken up for hearlng was based on bonafide grounds. 4) M.C.C. No. 266/2009, therefore, is allowed and M.A. No.09/2006 is restored to its original number. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- SunilKumar Sinha Judge subbu