THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED C.R.P.No.385 of 2010 Dated: 24-12-2010 Between: Kamma Venugopala Rao ………..Petitioner and Konda Vara Prasada Rao and others. …………Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED C.R.P.No.385 of 2010 ORDER : This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 27-07-2009 in I.A.No.569 of 2009 in O.S.No.205 of 2007, on the file of the VIII Additional District Judge, Guntur. 2. It is stated that the 1st respondent herein, who is the plaintiff in O.S.No.205 of 2007, has filed the above I.A. against the revision petitioner and R-2 to R-12 herein, under Order 1 Rule 10 and under Section 151 CPC to implead the revision petitioner/proposed party as D-12 in the suit. The Court below allowed the said petition on condition of the petitioner impleading the proposed party as D-12 in the suit, carrying out the necessary amendments in the plaint and filing amended plaint copy into the Court. The learned Judge having exercised the discretion held that for the effective adjudications of the disputes between the parties, it is proper and necessary to implead the proposed party as D-12. Aggrieved by the same, revision petitioner/D-12 approached this Court and filed the present revision petition challenging the order passed by the Court below. 3. A reading of the sale deed No.14536 of 2006, dated 11-10-2006, clearly discloses that the revision petitioner is a purchaser of the suit schedule property and that the suit is filed for possession of the suit schedule property and for mesne profits etc. The question as to the title over the suit schedule property is to be decided in the final judgment of the suit itself and therefore, the order of the Court below allowing impleadment of proposed party need not be disputed and the said impleadment cannot be denied by the revision petitioner at this stage. The trial Court exercised jurisdiction in a proper manner and I do not see any merit in this revision petition. If the Court below has not given any reasons while allowing the petition with regard to the impleadment of proper and necessary party, it is always open for the revision petitioner to move appropriate application before the Court below. 4. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________________ December 24, 2010 JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED kvr