IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6035 of 2009 RAMROOP MAHTO @ RAMSWAROOP MAHTO S/O LATE RAGHO MAHTO, R/O VILLGE- SACHAUL,P.S.- HISUA,DISTRICT- NAWADA Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.7389 of 2009 SUNIL MAJHI @ TUKAN MANJHI S/O MUNKI MANJHI R/O VILLAGE- DONA, AT PRESENT VILALGE- SACHAUL TOLA BARTALA, P.S.- HISUA, DISTRICT- NAWADA Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.12985 of 2009 DINESH MAHTO S/O LATE NATHO MAHTO, R/O VILLAGE- SACHAUL, P.S.- HISUA, DISTRICT- NAWADA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 24/04/2009 Above noted applications arising out of one occurrence i.e. Hisua P.S. Case No. 72 of 2008 have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners are accused of a case which has been registered under sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant’s husband was killed. She suspected that the killing might be on account of some enmity by the petitioners. Submission is that the learned Sessions Judge after going through the case diary passed the impugned order and even the total reliance is taken into account then the case hardly makes out that the petitioners were last seen in the company of the deceased. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, 2 the petitioners above named of all the cases are directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M.,/concerned court, Nawada in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 72 of 2008. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)