IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1405 of 2009 GOBARDHAN RAI S/O-Late Ram Pujan Rai, R/O-Vill-Babura, P.S.-Barhara, Distt.-Bhojpur. ………………………………………….Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR …………………………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 4/ 04.05.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the allegation the petitioner is assailant, his sons are also accused but allegation against them is not of giving fatal blow that is solely attributed against the petitioner. Submission is that there is a counter version of the case i.e. Annexure-2. The injuries were found to be simple by the doctor. Learned Counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the case has been compromised and at best the case comes under Section 304 Part-I of the Indian Penal 2 Code. As per the FIR the petitioner is the sole assailant of the deceased. Considering this, I am not inclined to grant bail to him. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after examination of the informant. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)