1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.979 OF 2011 Arvind Dukhi Singh .Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr.M.K.Kocharekar i/b. Mr.Rajeev Sawant & Associates, Advocate, for the Applicant Ms Rajeshree Gadhvi, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 12TH DECEMBER, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is an application for anticipatory bail by a person, who apprehends arrest in connection with C.R.No.I-217 of 2011 for the offences punishable under Sections 434 & 436 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Kashimira Police Station. The first informant and her daughter are present in the Court. They 2 re-iterate that they have no grievance about the applicant. The investigating officer identifies them to be the same persons. In view of this, Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The first informant and her daughter are warned not to take time of police machinery for a ride like this in future. In the event of arrest, applicant be released on bail on his furnishing P.R.Bond of ` 25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of ` 25,000/- on the following conditions. (i) The applicant shall report at the Kashimira Police Station as and when required by the investigating officer for interrogation. (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. . The order will remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge sheeted the applicant may furnish fresh 3 bonds before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in AIR 2011 (SC) 312(Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State of Maharashtra And Ors.). (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)