IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4709/2009. Date of decision:05.4.2010 Meena Sharma ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B,Misra, Judge. For the Petitioner: Mr.Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms.Ranjana Parmar, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG., for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.Lalit Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.4. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.(Oral) Petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure P-4 order of transfer. According to the petitioner, she has been disturbed thrice within an year. It is also submitted that the disturbance is made only to accommodate the private respondent. This is disputed by the learned counsel for the private respondent. Be that as it may. According to the petitioner, the present transfer is in violation of the norms. Since the impugned order is made by the Deputy Director, petitioner may file an appropriate representation before the first respondent in which case the first respondent will look into the matter because apparently the impugned order is passed pursuant to the direction issued by the Director. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of as follows. In the event of petitioner filing an appropriate representation within one week from today the matter will be duly examined by the first respondent and appropriate orders in accordance with law will be passed within another one week. In case the petitioner or the 5th respondent seeks an opportunity to make representations, the same shall also be permitted. Till such orders are passed, as above, it will be open to the petitioner to apply for leave. Copy dasti. . (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice April 05, 2010(s/sl) ( Justice R.B. Misra ), Judge