23.08.2004: ~ Shri Shailendra Sorii, counse \ Shri Sandeep Dubely, Panel Heard. The petitioner has filed this i part of respondent No. 3 in not isi inspite of the direction of superii selected as staff nurse. lt is submi‘ and verification etc. having been dq‘ the appointment order. On 174.07.2C the respondents to seek instruction not being issued to the petitioner. submitted that he has already info dated 14.07.2004 but .no instruc Learned counsel for the petition verification etc. done the similarly appointment orders by respondent Learned counsel for‘the petitioner verification etc. done; the appointme arbitrarily. ln these circumstances. the i appointment order to the petitioner already issued. With the aforesaid observatior lfor the petitioner. pawyer forthe respondents. betition challenging the inaction on the suing the order of appointment to her >r authorities though she. has been lied that despite‘the availability or post ne, the petitioner has not been issued . 104 this Court had directed counsel for s as to why the appointment order is Learned counsel for the respondents ed the respondents about the order ion has been received from them. r submitted that after getting the situated persons have been issued No. 2 vide annexures Pita and P/14. further submitted that after having nt of the petitioner cannot be withheld Lespondents are directed to issue the within a month from today if it is not is, the petition stands disposed of. WA-% Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge l