IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26284 of 2010 SMT. SUKHRAJI DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 20.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Bharat Ram, aggrieved BPL person was entitled for Indira Awas scheme, was not given its benefit is an admitted fact. Petitioner is Mukhiya, innocence is pleaded that there is no allegation against her but I find no substance in it. Someone deputed by her husband, was realizing the money is admitted by beneficiaries while the matter was inquired though it has come in inquiry that one clerk of B.D.O. office stated about mistake in not providing Indira Awas to above Bharat Ram but the matter is very serious that beneficiaries are also being provided Indira Awas only after realization of money that also not directly rather by a person appointed by petitioner’s husband. Further seriousness appears in exonerating the petitioner herself from the liability in having any hand in selection of beneficiaries only due to finalization of the list by the B.D.O. as per annexure-2. In the discussed circumstance that is 2 sufficient to refuse anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)