r} •. , i' I.2 -11-2003 2.23 2-ZOO, { ~--, lN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM 0PDER SHEET ci.ii..cacord...rm.i ......................... N8. 5 ». chedron ur~ Order with Signature of 200 3. Petitioner / Appellant F]espondent ut. N. Ch.nd]razi appears ln person one .giv€® that be he. £1led . unit petlclon n the Hop.bLe SxpreDe co`irE challenglno the valldlty of corral Act 12 o£ 2002 Glad r`il®® £rapd br thL. co`irc and pre¥e chat, thle batter be llded ozie roDth .ft®r. to rqcocted. put `p chi. caa. after rcopenlng of the cone 1.a. co 23-2-2004 for aapee|oz). ,a.A.R#a ) chi®£ egivco 26-11-2003 . Sturl Chant:ran appearing ln person 8umc8 that, t.h® r®vico. ptlttotl £1lea by hl,a agalrst the order of the Supred- co`irc le pendtry b®£or® the inn.ble supren® co`ift. J`a req\a.8Ced try him, p`db up on 22-3-2004 for admlsalon. R.K. in Chl.£ Fu8ttc. 23-2-2004. Off ice Note as to act.Ion (.if any) taken on Order s€c ,GDA I al DateofoflerOrder Order with Signature aoc:::cne(,,vtsoiFyfo . _ ,takenontorde 3. ii 2.3.20 Shri Chandran appearing in person submits that lie has not yet received any communication with. regard to the outcome of the review petition filed by him in the Honble Supreme Court and accordingly prays for adjournment. I am not inclined to accede to his prayer as this matter has already s.uffe.red two adjournments. This appeal is directed against the judgment and I decree dated 30.9.2003 passed by a single Judge of this Court (Justice R. K. Patra, Chief Justice), in Civil First Appeal No.2 of 1997 which arose out of the decision dated 23.7.1997 rendered Jby the District Judge (South & West), Sikkim at Gangtok in Civu Suit No.14 of 1997. The prayer o£.the appellant in this present appeal is to a Division Bench. Section 100-A CPC as amended by Central Act No.22 of 2002 which has come into force with effect from 1.7.2002 reads as foll6ws :-"100A.Nofurtherappeal in certain cases: Nothwithstanding anything contained in any Letters Patent fpr any High Court or in any instrument having the force Of law or in any other.law for the time being in force, where any appeal from any original or appenatedecreeororderisheardanddecidedbyaSingleJudgeofaHighCourtnofurtherappealshallliefromthejudgmeitanddecreeofsuch Single Jrudge." from the above it, is clear that no further appeal shall lie from the judgment and decree of a single Judge of the High Court. This being the legal position, the present appeal is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed. -.i_- SerialNo.ofOrder Datead#,# T ®Orderwith Signature Office Note as toaction(ifany)takenonOrder + It is made clear that in case any order is receivedfromtheHonbleSupremeCourtinhisfavour,the appellant is at liberty to move this Court with an appropriate application. Appeal dismissed. No costs. ( R. K. Papra ) Chiof rfuaece