IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 462 OF 2003 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 463 OF 2003 Ivan V. Lobo ... Applicant versus M.S. Menon & anr ... Respondents ... Mr. Girish Kulkarni, for the Applicant in both Crl.Revn.Applns. Mr. A.M. Saraogi, for the Respondent No. 1. Mr. K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the State. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 6th December 2004 P.C.: . Hearing of these matters was deferred as parties were exploring possibility of some amicable resolution of the dispute. Respondent No. 1 has clarified his stand that he had no intention to defame the Applicant. The Applicant accepts the stand taken on behalf of Respondent No.1. Counsel for the Applicant submits that even though the law is in favour of the Applicant, the Applicant will not pursue these proceedings in view of the clarification given by Respondent No. 1 and having accepted the position that he had no intention to defame the Applicant. In the circumstances, both these Revision Applications are disposed of on the basis of agreement reached between the parties. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)