(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 4596 OF 1999 1. Jalgaon Zilha Maratha Vidya Prasarak Cooperative Samaj Ltd., through its Hon. Secretary, Tanaji s/o. Keshavrao Bhoite. 2. Walmik s/o. Mana Deore, Age : Major, Occupation : Service, R/o. Dongaon, Taluka : Erandol, District : Jalgaon. 3. Shalikram s/o. Shankarrao Patil, Age : Major, Occupation : Service, R/o. Wavde, Taluka : Amalner, District : Jalgaon. .. Petitioners. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra. 2. The Director of Education, Secondary, Maharashtra State, Central Building, Pune. 3. The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon, District : Jalgaon. (2) 4. Jalgaon Zilla Maratha Vidya Prasarak Cooperative Society, Maryadit, Jalgaon, Through its Honourary Secretary Vijay Bhaskar Patil, Age : 30 years, Occupation : Advocate, R/o. Dixit Wadi, Jalgaon. 5. Bhagwantrao Ramchandra Desle, Age : 53 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Kisan Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Shevge Budruk, Taluka : Parwa, District : Jalgaon. 6. Pandharinath Dodhu Choudhary, Age : 56 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Wavadada, Jalgaon, District : Jalgaon. 7. Iccharam Ravan Patil, .. Respondents Age : 56 years, (Nos.4 to 7 - Occupation : Service, Intervenors) R/o. Sadhana Madhyamik, Higher Secondary Vidyalaya, Kasoda, Taluka : Erandol, District : Jalgaon. ....................... Mr. K.S. Bhore, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mrs. R.K. Ladda, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1, 2 and 3. (3) Mr. L.V. Sangit, Advocate, for respondent nos.4 to 7 / Intervenors. ........................ CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE : 17TH AUGUST 2010 COURT'S ORDER (Per B.R. Gavai, J.) : 1. The relief claimed in the petition is for quashing and setting aside the orders dated 13th August 1999 and 14th June 1999, issued by the respondent no.3, thereby refusing to grant approval to the transfer orders of petitioner nos.2 and 3. 2. By an interim order dated 3rd March 2000, while granting rule, this Court has stayed the impugned orders and directed the respondent nos.2 and 3 to approve the transfer orders. 3. In that view of the matter, purpose of the petition has been served by interim order. (4) 4. In the result, the petition is allowed and rule is made absolute by converting the interim relief into final relief. However, parties shall bear their own costs. ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp4596