IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35358 of 2011 Shlok Sah @ Shlok Sao, S/o Late Munshi Sao, resident of Ghansurpur, P.S. Bakhtiyarpur, District Patna. At present- Renter of Shakti Choudhary, Gobindpur, Fatuha, P.S. Fatuha, Distt. Patna Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 25.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, which has been lodged on the basis of the self-statement of Sub-Inspector of Police after recovery of the dead body of Arun Yadav, who was done to death by the petitioner. Implication of the petitioner has come to light on the basis of the print out of call details of his mobile telephone and the mobile telephone of the deceased wherefrom it appears that before the occurrence petitioner was in constant touch with the deceased. Counsel for the petitioner states that call details of the two mobile numbers referred to in the First Information Report is not available in the case diary. Aforesaid fact does not appear to be correct in view of the observation of the learned Sessions Judge 2 under order dated 28.7.2011 refusing prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail, as therefrom it appears that the learned Sessions Judge has proceeded on the basis that petitioner was in constant touch with the deceased Arun Yadav priorto the occurrence. In view of the observations above, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail, although he is in jail custody with effect from 9.2.2011. This application is rejected. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that charges have already been framed. In the circumstances, trial court is directed to expedite the trial. Arjun/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)