IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13420 of 2009 SABAHUDDIN AZEEM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 15.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner claims salary in between the period of October, 2002 to May, 2003. He has filed a representation for the same as appended at Anendure-7 dated 5.12.2004. This Court finds that the representation is detailed in light of the orders of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 11453 of 2002 and C.W.J.C. No. 2190 of 2003 followed by M.J.C. No. 890 of 2003. If the petitioner had to come to this Court for enforcement of his right to discharge duty on the transferred post being wrongly interfered with by another, and he was also required to file a contempt application for non compliance of the orders of this Court and orders of punishment on the contempt application passed, there may not be justification for the denial of salary to him. This Court therefore directs respondent no. 2 to examine the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, decide and dispose of the representation of the petitioner within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The legitimate dues of the petitioner, if any, be then paid to the the 2 petitioner within the same period. If the respondents propose to deny wages, he shall be required to furnish reasons to the petitioner and grant him a personal hearing if he so desires and then pass reasoned and speaking order to facilitate judicial review, should the need arise for the same. The writ application stands disposed off. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)