IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33303 of 2008 BABLOO KUMAR … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner:Shri Ramesh Kr.Choudhary For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta, APP ----------- 3. 27.11.2008 Heard. While dismissing the prayer for bail of the petitioner being Annexure-1, the Court had directed the trial to be expedited. That order was passed on 20.3.2008. Unfortunately, the case was committed to the court of Sessions four months after on 8.7.2008. As such, the effect of the order of trial appears redundant. The record was sent by the committing court to the Sessions Judge on 20.7.2008 and no wonder the record is still lying in the office of an Additional Sessions Judge or the Sessions Judge, Patna. As such, the Court could not put down any timeframe as regards the trial. However, the Court could expect the learned Sessions Judge, Patna, to see that the Sessions trial arising out of Chowk P.S. Case No. 219 of 2 2007 has been made over to any Judge of competent jurisdiction and the learned Judge takes up the matter with all urgency, specially in view of the fact that the victim could not bear any sign of rape and there is a definite defence of false implication. The Court expects the trial to be concluded in one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the present order. The petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar jha)