IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5963 of 2009 1.SATYA NARAYAN SAH son of Sri Kusum Sah, resident of village- Dublyahi, P.S.-Kishanpur, Dist.-Supaul 2.Brahmdeo sah, son of Gopali Sah, resident of village- Sukhesan, P.S.- Kishanpur, Dist.-Supaul Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.4.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner is an accused of a case which has been registered under sections 302 and 201/34 the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners are not named in the first information report The informant’s daughter Tanveera Khatoon was a divorcee andshe was living with the informant. She went off from the house for purchasing food grains etc. but she did not return. Later on her dead body was found. Informant has suspected that she might have been killed by the named accused. Submission is that the petitioners are not named in the first information report. During entire investigation no witness has supported the prosecution case. In course of investigation it has come that the deceased was going to file a case for property as wife of Gopali Sah and for that she changed her name as Raj Kumari. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case the above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Kishanpur P.S.Case No.179 of 2008. Md.S. (Shyam Kishore Sharma,J.)