IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA TUESDAY, THE 17TH JUNE 2008 / 27TH JYAISHTA 1930 Bail Appl..No. 3796 of 2008() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.102/2008 OF OLLUR POLICE STATION PETITIONER/4TH ACCUSED --------------------------------------- HARIPRASAD, S/O. VELAYUDHAN, CHULLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, ANCHERY DESOM, OLLUR VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.ALAN PAPALI RESPONDENT: RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT ----------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, (CRIME NO. 102/2008 OF OLLUR POLICE STATION, S.H.O OLLUR POLICE STATION) REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. HEMA, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A.No. 3796 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of June, 2008 O R D E R Application for anticipatory bail. 2. Petitioner is the 4th accused in the crime registered under sections 143, 447, 427 read with section 149 IPC and section 3 of the Explosive Substances Act. 3. According to the prosecution, accused 1 to 3 who are old students of an school formed themselves into an unlawful assembly, when the Annual Day celebration of the school was going on and trespassed into the school compound, burned crackers and threw them over the asbestos of the craft room behind the school auditorium and caused damages. The further allegation is that some of the accused came in a car and four bikes and the vehicles were driven amidst the students and parents, who were returning home after the function, terrifying them and causing annoyance to them. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is absolutely innocent of the allegations made. As per the records, no allegation is made against him for burning crackers etc. He is implicated BA 3796/08 -2- for allegedly coming to the school in vehicles. It is submitted that the name of the petitioner was given by his own father, since the petitioner had a driving licence. But, later he came to know that the petitioner was not involved. 5. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that accused 1 and 3 were granted anticipatory bail by Juvenile Justice Board. Hence, there is no reason to refuse the same relief to the petitioner who is also a student. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the following order is passed:- 6. The respondent shall release the petitioner, in the event of his arrest, on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer on condition that he will co-operate with the investigation and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when directed. It is also directed that one of the parents of the petitioner shall also execute a bond for the same amount as stated above whether he/she is solvent or not, as a third surety. The application is allowed as above. K. HEMA, JUDGE. BA 3796/08 -3- mn.