IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.821 of 2010 MALTI DEVI Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ----------- 11. 6.4.2011. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Corporation and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Provident Fund Department. The processes undertaken by the Corporation and the Provident Fund Department for disbursement of the pension is not reaching finality by reason of lapses on the part of the petitioner herself in not opening the bank account in the name of her minor son Dheeraj Kumar Chaudhary enabling the Provident Fund Department to release the pension amount together with arrears in the respective accounts. It is for this purpose that the matter was adjourned on 23.3.2011 until today enabling the petitioner to take all such steps for opening the bank account in favour of her minor son Dheeraj Kumar Chaudhary. Mr. Maheshwar Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that despite best efforts, the petitioner has not yet been able to open the 2 bank account. He submits that the same would be opened within a period of next two weeks. Mr. J.P. Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Provident Fund Department, assures the court that no sooner the bank account is opened by the petitioner in favour of her minor son Dheeraj Kumar Chaudhary and due intimation being given to the Department, necessary steps for release of the pension amount in favour of the petitioner and her minor children would be undertaken within two weeks from the date such intimation is given by the petitioner. In view of fair stand taken by the learned counsel for the Provident Fund Department, this application stands disposed by reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a petition for revival of this contempt application, in case the Provident Fund Department delays the implementation of the order despite their undertaking. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J)