IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4845 of 2009 Date of decision: 8th December, 2009 M/s Raj Solvent Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Sushil Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajvir Sihag, Advocate for HSIDC. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Present writ petition has been filed challenging the decision passed by respondent Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation, whereby the industrial plot allotted to the petitioner Company was resumed. In Civil Writ Petition No.8685 of 2008, Mr. Rajiv Arora, Managing Director, HSIDC appeared on 16th November, 2009 and the detailed order was passed. The relevant portion of the order is reproduced as under: “Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation’s Cases Mr. Rajiv Arora, Managing Director, Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation is present in Court in pursuance of order dated 11.11.2009. He has submitted that Civil Writ Petition No.4845 of 2009 only 57 writ petitions are pending in this Court where Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation is party. He has brought the list of cases. A photocopy of the list is retained. Mr.Arora has further stated that there is in-house mechanism for redressal of the grievance of the allottees. In 2007, guide- lines were issued by the Corporation and three Members Anomaly Committee has been constituted. According to the list supplied, all the 57 cases be listed for motion hearing on 3.12.2009 by the Registry. Copy of the list of cases is taken on record as Annexure A1. Mr.Arora has assured that in all these cases, counsel for Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation will cause appearance. Thereafter, each case will be taken up and the counsel will supply information whether the case can be considered by the Anomaly Committee or not. In the event, the cases to be referred to the Anomaly Committee, the same will be referred and on that case decision will be taken up by the Anomaly Committee, within two months.” Counsel for the respondent Corporation states that the case of the petitioner shall be considered by the Anomaly Committee and a decision shall be taken thereupon within two months after receipt of certified copy of this order. Counsel for the petitioner has accepted the above said offer. In view of the statement made by counsel for the respondent Corporation, let Anomaly Committee consider the claim of the petitioner. In case the order passed by the Anomaly Committee is accepted by the petitioner, then he may comply with the decision of the Anomaly Committee. However, in case the decision of the Anomaly Committee is not accepted by the petitioner, he may file a fresh writ petition in this Court 2 Civil Writ Petition No.4845 of 2009 assailing the order passed by the Anomaly Committee. Needless to say, the petitioner shall have liberty to take all pleas, available to him under law, including those which are raised in the present petition. Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is an interim order in favour of the petitioner. The same shall continue till a decision is taken by the Anomaly Committee. Petitioner will be permitted to be represented by the Counsel before the Anomaly Committee. In case an adjournment is sought, the Anomaly Committee may grant the same, however, in that case Anomaly Committee will not be bound to decide the case within specified time limit of two months. With these observations, present writ petition is disposed of. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE December 8, 2009 rps 3