IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24495 of 2011 Suman Upadhyay @ Suman Kumar Upadhyay Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Bhulla Ram, son of Late Phusi Ram ----------- 2. 10.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 384, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Considering that the petitioner is an employee of State Bank of India and it is on account of discharge of his official duties that the complaint has been instituted by the Complainant, let the petitioner in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Complaint Case bearing C.R. No. 209 of 2011 (Tr. No. 623 of 2011), shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C., and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the local since the petitioner belongs to Jharkhand. The bailor will undertake to furnish 2 information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)