IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No: 1552 of 1999 Between: Y.Venkatarama Raju, s/o. Lakshmi Narasimha Raju, R/o. Konthiwada(V),Veeravasaram(M),W.G.Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Dist Collector, Eluru, W.G.Dist. 2 Revenue divisional Officer, Narsapur, W.G.Dist. 3 Mandal Revenue Officer, Veeravasaram, W.G.Dist. 4 Village Admn. Officer, Madugupolavaram, Veeravasaram(M),W.G.Dist. 5 Y.Satyanarayana Raju, S/o. Venkataraju, R/o. Konthiwada(V),Veeravasaram(M),W.G.Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to To issue an order , direction or any appropriate writ more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the rrespondent No.2 in issuing impugned order in D.Dis.No.,1926/98(K) , dt.26.12.98 cancelling hte pettadar pass book and titled deed for an extent of ac.1.31 cents in R.S.No.35/1, 35/4 and 42/1 situate at Konthiwada(V),Veeravasaram(M),W.G.Dist. and not allowing the petitioner and his tenant to enter into the said lands for carring on agsricultural operations in the abovesaid lands , as illegal, arbitrary,violative of principles of natural justice and violative of a consequential order directing the respondents 1 to 4 to drop all further proceedings in this regard by suspending the said impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.CH.DHANAMJAYA Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.C.RAMACHANDRA RAJU The Court made the following : ORDER: Sri Ch.Dhanamjaya, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that since the dispute between the petitioner and the 5th respondent is essentially a civil dispute for which the proper forum is the civil Court of competent jurisdiction, the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the petition with a liberty to approach the competent civil Court in this regard. Leaving it open to the petitioner, if he so chooses to avail the remedy of a civil suit, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ______________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J 18th March, 2009 CVRK