IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 30TH JULY 2009 / 8TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 21461 of 2009(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): 1 ---------------- KATHREENA, D/O. DEVASSY, AGED 85, KANNAMPUZHA HOUSE, MAMPRA KARA, KARUKUTTY P.O., PARAKKADAVU, ALUVA. BY ADV. SRI.S.SUDHISH KUMAR SRI.K.Y.TOMY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, FORTKOCHI. 2. WILSON,S/O. ANTONY, PULLEN VEEDU, MAMPRA KARA, PARAKKADAVU VILLAGE, KARUKUTTY P.O. BY GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).21461/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 30th day of July, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner complained of certain trees standing in the 2nd respondent's property poised in a dangerous manner over her property before the RDO, the 1st respondent. 1st respondent issued Ext.P1 notice to the 2nd respondent requiring him to cut and remove the said trees. Present complaint is alleging delay in further steps being taken pursuant to Ext.P1. 2. Sub Divisional Magistrate should take an action under Section 133 of the Cr.P.C, only after a conditional order is passed. 1st respondent shall therefore, take further steps pursuant to Ext.P1, after notice to the 2nd respondent also, to see that the proceedings under Section 133 of the Cr.P.C are either finalized or dropped as the case may be, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs