IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 235 of 2010. Decided on: 5.3.2010 Hardyal Singh …. Petitioner Versus Registrar Co-operative Societies and others ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr.Justice V.K.Ahuja, Judge For the petitioner: Mr.K.B. Khajuria, Advocate. For respondents No.1 & 2: Mr.R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General. For respondent No.3: Mr.Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.(Oral) The petitioner has approached this Court with certain grievances regarding the selection and appointment to the post of Salesman in the respondent Society. During the pendency of the writ petition, it is seen that the third respondent Society has initiated the process of fresh selection for appointment to the post. It is brought to our notice that the petitioner has also participated in the selection process. In the above circumstances, we do not think it proper to go into the validity or legality of the selection impugned in the writ petition. The petitioner will be governed by the outcome of the selection process initiated afresh by the third respondent Society. 2 The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly, so also the pending application(s), if any. ( Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. March 5, 2010 (V.K.Ahuja) (trs/bss) Judge