IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CONTEMPT PeTTFON N0. / O.S~~ of 2010 cy^^ ^J APPLJCANT: Smt. Sushila Devangan, widow of Late Poshan Lal Devangan, aged about 43 years, r/o Ward No.IO, Pandariya, Tehsil Pandariya. District Kabirdham (CG) Vs CONTEMNORS ^ 1. Shri Ashok Kumar Bhoi, In-charge ^* ^yV^y c[}ie^ Municipal Officer, Nagar ,..^;^' Ponc^t Pcn^a, '..tnct Panchayat Pandariya, bistrict ^- ^? > ,*^. ^•^-^> ..-" v' Kabirdham (CG) 2.^Smt. Mamta Raj,, wife of Late Shri Santosh Singh Raj, aged about 40 years, In-charge Project Officer, Women <& Child Welfare, PandariyQ, bistrict Kabirdham (CG) 3. Sanjay Shukla, s/o not known to applicant, aged about 45 yrs, Commissioner, Urban Administration, Women &. Chiid Welfare Dept., D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C6) 4. Ashok Pandey, s/o not known to applicant, aged about 42 yrs Women <& Child Welfare Officer, Tehsil Pandariya, bist. Kabirdham (CG) ^^ CONTEMPT PETITION UNbER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT. 1973 __._._..w^______.,_..__ 3:n^T'^T l^w-sn^T ^RW^T Tumane •^ET ^TRT^PT, ^ril^^ltf, facrll^^ 3TS^T TS^W . €^1:^^:0.1^ &5^<rt^ •^ 20b WR^TT5h*11<^ '^^ST' ^^^ SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan <=bl^fd41^ 'HF^ff ^ fe^ <M^i< '^5?f^R3:n^T Shrivastava, J. 11-03-2011 Ms. Sharmila Singhai along ^ith Shri Amrito Das, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Santosh Bharat, counsel legal advice in the matter, the respon 23-02-2011, by which, the petitioner )r respondent No.2. Heard. Learned counsel for respond^nts No.2 submits that after seeking jent No.2 has now issued an order on |s now handed over the charge of the office of Aanganbadi Karyakarta. Leajrned counsel for the respondent No.2 submitted that the circumstances un(|ler which, the respondent No.2 could not take steps, have been stated in t|ie return, but now appropriate orders have been passed. ^ubmission made by tearned counsel (J by respondent No.2 as also the fact that now an order has been passed ojn 23-02-2011 by the respondent No.2 in compliance of the order passeJJ by this Court on 19-01-2009 in W.P.(S)No.265 of 2009, 1 am not incpned to proceed further in the matter. Rule is therefore discharged, The petition is finally disposed Taking into consideration the for the parties and the reply submitte bff. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [•qtt -^fe^