IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 525 of 2011. Decided on 26th April, 2011. Gursangat Kaur and others. …Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the Petitioners : Ms. Aruna Sharma, Advocate, vice Ms. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners have approached this Court since they were not appointed though selected. During the pendency of the writ petition, petitioners No.1 and 2 have been appointed. Therefore, the issue survives only in respect of the third petitioner. 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General submits that there was no vacancy in science stream for offering the appointment to the petitioner as teacher in Sub Division, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur. The third petitioner submits that he is willing to serve anywhere in Sirmaur District where there is a vacancy in science stream. The third petitioner may point out this aspect before the second respondent, in which case the second respondent will 2 examine the matter and in case any such concession has been granted to any other teacher, as per the policy, similar treatment shall be given to the third petitioner herein also. The needful, as above, shall be done within a period of two months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the representation by the third petitioner. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 26th April, 2011 (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr) Judge.