BailAppl 775/08 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.775/08 Prahalad Versus State DATE OF ORDER : 12/02/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Bharat Singh, for accused-applicant Mr. R.P. Kuldeep, Public Prosecutor *** Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the material on record. It has been contended by counsel for applicant that present accused is Prahalad S/o Chirmoli and he has not been named in the FIR - infact accused named is Prahlad S/o Pappu who used fire arm on one of injured Sahadeo and even during statement recorded u/s.161 Cr.P.C., no one has made statement about injury if any caused by present accused-applicant to any of the injured and the fact which the learned trial Judge has recorded in his order about Prahlad who used fire arm is not the present accused, but it is Prahald S/o Pappu. Taking note of material on record and without expressing any opinion on merits, this court considers it appropriate to allow the anticipatory bail of accused-applicant Prahalad. BailAppl 775/08 [2] Accordingly, I allow the bail application of the applicant U/s 438 Cr.P.C. and the SHO/IO of Police Station Kama, District Bharatpur is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant Prahalad S/o Shri Chirmoli in FIR No.130/07, he shall enlarge him on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- to his satisfaction on the following conditions: (i) He shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when requires; (ii) He shall not directly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any Police Officer; (iii) He shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA775Bail Application2008 12-2.doc