FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 54 OF OF 2007 IN W.P. NO. 3568 OF 1992. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. V.D. Salunke, Advocate for the petitioner Mr R.P. Phatke, AGP for respondent No.1 Mr. N.B. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent No.3 Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM :- D.B. BHOSALE & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE :- 1st FEBRUARY, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this civil application, the applicant is seeking review of the order dated 14th October, 2004, passed in W.P. No. 2568/1992. 2] Learned counsel for the applicant submits that after disposal of the writ petition, the petitioner has procured 3 more documents which are annexed at page Nos. 18 to 20 to the review petition, and that all the documents would show that the applicant fulfills/satisfy both the conditions mentioned in the Govt. Resolution dated 27th November, 1991 and therefore, he is entitled for the reliefs prayed in the writ petition. 3] We have perused the orders so also the documents FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 54 OF OF 2007 IN W.P. NO. 3568 OF 1992. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 relied upon by the applicant. The condition No.1 in the Govt. Resolution provides that initial appointment of the teacher from "rest category", should be in a clear vacancy in the pay scale of Rs.700-1600 and the second condition lays down that as a result of introduction of 10 + 2 + 3 pattern of education, the said teacher from "rest category" ought to have been rendered excess in senior college. 4] After perusing the appointment letters placed on record dated 2/10/1995, 8/7/1977 and 23/10/1980, it is held that the petitioner was never appointed in senior college as a lecturer in the pay scale of Rs.700-1600, much less, against a clear vacancy and hence, there was no occasion for the petitioner being rendered as excess teacher in the senior college. The documents relied upon by the applicant do not change the complexion of the matter and in our opinion, they would not help the applicant to claim that he had fulfilled both the conditions stipulated at Sr. Nos. 1 and 2 mentioned in Govt. Resolution dated 27th November, 1991. 5] No case for review is made out. Hence, the review application is rejected. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 54 OF OF 2007 IN W.P. NO. 3568 OF 1992. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 3 [R.M. BORDE, J.] [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] grt/-