IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Crl. Misc. No. M-33132 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:21.01.2011 Amit Kumar .....Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. N.P.S. Kohli, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Mor, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) Crl. Misc. No.3762 of 2011 Application is allowed as prayed for. Crl. Misc. No.3673 of 2011 This is an application for placing on record written reply on behalf of respondent No.4 and documents Annexure R-4/1 to R-4/7. Application is allowed and written reply on behalf of respondent No.4 and documents Annexures R-4/1 to R-4/7 are taken on record. Crl. Misc. No. M-33132 of 2010 The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner Amit Kumar with a prayer that the matter was reported to the police vide DDR No.29 (A) dated 28.10.2010 but no action has been taken and prayer has also been made to decide the representation filed by the petitioner which Crl. Misc. No. M-33132 of 2010 (O&M) -2- is annexed as Annexure P4 with the petition. Status report has been filed and the same is taken on record. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from SI Ishwar Singh, submits that the representation filed by the petitioner has been decided and necessary action has been taken against the accused persons. In view of the reply as well as statement made by learned counsel for the State, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the petition. Accordingly, nothing remains in this petition and the same has become infructuous. Dismissed as having rendered infructuous. January 21, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE