CRIMINAL MISC. NO.M-33412 OF 2011 :{1 }: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: NOVEMBER 04, 2011 Paramjit Kaur .....Petitioner VERSUS U.T. Administration, Chandigarh ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Petitioner-Paramjit Kaur has filed this petition for directing the respondent to conduct proper investigation into the complaint dated 4.11.2010 annexed with the petition as Annexure P-5, which is addressed to Minister of Health and Family Welfare. How this petition would be maintainable under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is not explained in any manner. The petitioner is posted as Hostel Warden in National Institute of Nursing Education (For short, `NINE') in PGIMER, Chandigarh. Alleging that she is suffering at the hands of vested interest in the PGI because of her straight forward approach and her CRIMINAL MISC. NO.M-33412 OF 2011 :{2 }: refusal to associate in the illegal activities. The petitioner has made the present approach accordingly. The petitioner has a long list of grievances, mainly concerning her working as Hostel Warden. Apparently, this is some internal politics being played through the Court of law and this misconceived approach has been made to seek direction from this Court for issuing direction to conduct proper investigation into the complaint made to a Minister for Health, where allegation of bad character against the petitioner and allegations of prostitution in the hostel have been made. The record would show that PGI Vigilance Cell is undertaking some enquiries, which the petitioner would describe as for all together different purpose and not in regard to her complaint. The representation addressed to Minister of Health is for holding enquiry regarding ongoing politics in the Institution. Mrs.Paramjit Kaur and Mrs.Joginderwati working as Lecturer in NINE, PGI. The representation is addressed by the students of NINE Hostel. How a direction to investigate a representation or complaint, which is made against the petitioner to a Minister of Health would fall within the purview of Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuing direction for investigation by this Court is not made clear by the petitioner in any manner. During the course of arguments, the counsel was pointedly asked as to what cognizable offence is alleged or made out from the allegations, for which direction to investigate the complaint may be issued but the same fetched no answer at all. On the other hand, the counsel insisted on making submissions and for reading Annexure P-5. Despite repeated queries, the counsel did not make CRIMINAL MISC. NO.M-33412 OF 2011 :{3 }: any submission, justifying the approach under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or responded to the query as to what criminal liability would arise from the complaint, for which directions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. were being sought. The petitioner is misconceived in making the present approach and has not been properly advised to file this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. This petition is not maintainable as framed. Even otherwise, the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu Versus State of U.P. And others, 2008(1) RCR (Criminal) 392 would directly stare at the petitioner and would discourage this Court to permit the petitioner to use the Forum of this Court for fighting personal or private battle that the petitioner may be carrying on either with the Institution or any person working therein. The petition is dismissed being wholly misconceived. November 04, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE