IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14016 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Manoj Kumar S/O Ravindra Prasad Rai R/O Vill.-Sirdilpur, P.O.-Patori, P.S. Sahpur Patori, Distt.-Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Education Officer, Samastipur. 4. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Samastipur. 5. Mr. Shrawan Kumar, Headmaster-Cum-D.D.O. Govt. Middle School, Hasanpur Surat, P.S.-Shahpur Patory, P.O.-Patory, Distt.-Samastipur. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : M/s.Ashok Kumar Mishra & Varun Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Apurva Kumar, AC to SC10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) 3 22-12-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. From the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State it appears that the petitioner was in default as he had not submitted the details of his property due to which his salary from March, 2011 had been withheld and after he has supplied the property details, the same was resumed and he has already been paid salary till the month of August, 2011 except for the month of February, 2011, which, according to the respondents, was withheld on 2 account of non-supply of income tax challan. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that income tax challan has already been submitted by the petitioner before the Block Education Officer. If that is so then the petitioner would be clearly entitled for salary for the month of February, 2011 also. In the aforesaid circumstances, nothing more remains to be decided in the present writ application. It is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. S. Pandey/- (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)