9b. cr appa 998-10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 998 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 582 OF 2010 Dada Dagadu Thorat .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. Vikas Shivarkar for the Applicant Mr. V.B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the State CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J DATE : 26th AUGUST, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant original accused has been convicted under Section 325 of IPC and sentenced to suffer RI for two years and to pay a fine amount of Rs. 500/- in default RI for 3 months. The appeal preferred by the applicant is pending. Now, the applicant is seeking bail. 3. The learned advocate for the applicant states that the applicant was on bail pending the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. This statement is not 1 9b. cr appa 998-10.doc controverted by the prosecution. Moreover, sentence of the applicant is only two years and the appeal is not likely to be heard in the near future. In this view of the matter, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. Hence, the following order: O R D E R 1. The Applicant Dada Dagadu Thorat be released on bail in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- [Rs. Fifteen Thousand Only] with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The Applicant shall report to the concerned police station once in a month till disposal of the appeal. 2. Application is disposed of. [SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] 2 9b. cr appa 998-10.doc 3