1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.165 OF 2009 Mr.Mohd. Mustafa @ Kalim Mohd. ..... Applicants Farukh Qureshi & Ors. vs. The State of Maharashtra ..... Respondents Mr.Shashi Kumar Pandey i/by Mr. P.R.Yadav for applicants. Mr. S.V. Gajare, APP for State. CORAM : SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED : 21st August, 2009. PC : 1. This Revision application challenges the order passed by the Sessions Court, Bombay rejecting the application for discharge filed by the applicants. The applicants are the accused in the complaint filed under Section 307 r/w 34 at the instance of one Mohammed Shamin Mohammed, the complainant, wherein it is alleged that on the date and time of the incident, the applicants assaulted him causing grievous injuries. The assault by the applicant No.1 was with an iron rods whereas the others had assaulted with hands and legs. The complaint as filed initially named only applicants no. 1 to 4. The name of applicant no.5 came to be added by way of subsequent statement recorded by Police. As has been rightly held by the learned Sessions Judge, it cannot be said that the allegations made in the proceedings do not disclose 2 any offence against the applicants. The learned counsel for the applicants then submits that the contents of F.I.R. do not disclose offence punishable under Section 307 Indian Penal Code and requests that the applicants may be discharged of at least of the offence under that Section. The applicants are at liberty to advance this argument before the trial Court at the time of hearing before charge. Criminal Revision Application is dismissed. (Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota, J.)