•iya-^^^-^-feS- L.-.r;,-r/.^>.^:' ^- -• •- -• L- ^ ..'... •^-: IH THS HIQB GOmS! OF MADHZ& AI JABALPUE MISC.PBSITI® ^nOF 1992. CF0000110458 PETITIOHEES; u ^ 2. .^ / ^/^ \/ / ^ I"; OOMM^^, ^zs\ [)(R.K.Ver^^ J \*^ ^ ^/l ^ s2- S3' AoJ^Yerghese^ aged fifty-three years, S/o.M.P.Joseph, Oecapations Senlor Saper^isor (Personnel), <P .10.0180), BM,CO, r/o.Qaarter 2SIo.4l9/Seet6r-T, BALGO Township, Korba,' BISTBIC3? 'sBILASPUB (M .P~.) . D.K.Majamdar, aged forty-eight years, ~ S/o.N. G .Maj' raadar , OccapaticmsAssistant General Foreman (Mecbanical), (?JIo.0909)» BALCO Township,. BALCO, r/o. Qaarter Io.S^^/B/3, BALCO, Korba, BISTEICT:BILASPUB '(M.P.). RamanaQd Bao, aged forty-eight years) S/o»Bansbi Bao, Occupations Issisiant General PoremanC&liiiriina), (P .HO .01 ?6?) , BALCG, r/o.Qaarter lo.101, Seetor-I, Ts^pe-III, BiLGO loimship, Korba, MSTBICT:BILASBJE (M.P.), Tersas - Bharat Aluisinimn Gompany Ltd<», (& Govemment of India Enterprises), Ihroaghs Chaipman-cam-Maiiaging Birector, Begd.Offiee:Maminiimi Sadan, Core-6, 3rd Ploor,_Scope- Office Complex, 7, Lodhi Ro&d,- IEW ©ELEI-3. ©irector(Operation & Projects), Bhara-t Almainium Gompany Ltd,, (BALCO), Korba, •iBILAS?UB (M.P*). Qeneral Manager (P & A), Bbarat Alaminiusi Company Ltd., (Bl.LGO), Korba, ©ISSBIGSiBILASPIIR (M .P.) . P^CITIOI WD'SB. ABTIGLE 226 OF 'mB COISTIIU'TIOM OF IIBIA FGB WiITS IN ?EE NAIBBE OF .CEBIIOKABI I.SMDMUS PHOHIBIIIQH E?C. & F0B FUEIHI APPBOPBIATE BI]S;GIIGSS_._ Ihe petitioners? name<a-al3ove, beg to state as i®ders- l^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 1387 of 1992 Petitioners A. J. Verghese & otiiers Versus Respondents Bharat Aluniuiiusii CoBipaay Ltd. & ofhers (Writ Petition under Article 226 oftlie Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri. Harsh Wardhan, Advocate for fhe petitioners, Shri P. S. Koshy, Advocate for tlie respondents. ORDER(orall ( Passed on tliis 15th day ofJaauary, 2010) Heard. 1. 2. 3. 4. Thakur The petitioners, who were ia the eniployEaent of the respondents, have filed this petition ou 21.4.1992 for flie followuig reliefs : to quash fhe pay fixatiou orders, to direct the respondents to fix petitioner's pay as per the recoiniaendations of the High Power Pay Coinmitt.ee, to allow benefit of 100% dearaess allowaiice aad to restraia the respondeuts from makmg aiiy adjustment or recovery oiit of the existiag emolum^nts of fhe petitioners. Ou 14.7.2005 the respondents were directed to file present status of fhe case wifh regard to fhe payment of salaiy, pensionar^^ benefits etc. to the petitioners. Learaed counsel appeaiing for fhe respondents has produced a copy of tlie mstouctions aiid submits that all the three petitioners have been retu'ed on attain.mg flie age of superaanuation on 30.4.1997, 31.10.2000 aad 30.11.2000, respectively aiid their retiral dues have been paid to thenx, wifliin. few monfhs frora ttie date of their retirement Accoixlmg to learaed counsel fhis petition has becorae infructuous, Copy of fhe io.structions is taken on record. Learaed counsel appeariag for the petitioners pleads no instructions. It appears that fhe petitioners niay not be iaterested ia prosecution oftlie matt.er. In view ofthe above, the petition is disinissed as haviiig beconie iiifructiious. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge