IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.21777 of 2004 Between: Doki Mohana Rao, S/o Buch Krishnamurthy, r/o Kothapeta, Kotabommali Mandal, Srikakulam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Srikakulam District, Srikakulam. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kotabommali Mandal, Srikakulam District. 3 The President, Kothapeta Grampanchayat, Kotabommali Mandal, Srikakulam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 1st respondent in not disposing of the representation dated 10-3-2004 for construction of bus shelter in Sy.No. 111/1 of Kothapeta village as illegal, arbitrary, unjustified and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation and permit to construct the bus shelter in S.No. 111/1 of Kothapeta village. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.VARA PRASAD RAO Counsel for the Respondents 1 and 2: GP FOR REVENUE The Court at the admission stage made the following: ORDER: The petitioner claims to have constructed a bus shelter in memory of his father by spending about 70 % of the cost of construction in the year 1982-83 and that the said bus shelter was demolished by the National Highway Authorities for road widening. It is also stated that the petitioner has provided an extent of Ac.0.15 cents of land to the Revenue authorities for construction of Inspector Building and the said Inspector Building was also demolished for the purpose of road widening and the said land is vacant and is convenient for construction of bus shelter. The grievance of the petitioner is that due to demolition of the bus shelter the general public is facing hardships and that he has made a representation to the first respondent dated 10-3-2004 to provide the above stated vacant site for construction of bus shelter and that no action is taken thereon and the said representation is remained unanswered. Hence, the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. Both counsel agreed for disposal of the writ petition at the stage of admission. Since the representation of the petitioner dated 10-3-2004 is pending, the respondents are directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. ____________ N.V.RAMANA,J 29-11-2004 TO, 1 The District Collector, Srikakulam District, Srikakulam. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kotabommali Mandal, Srikakulam District. 3 The President, Kothapeta Grampanchayat, Kotabommali Mandal, Srikakulam District. 4. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of AP, Hyderabad (OUT) 5. 2 CD copies THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.21777 of 2004 Date: 29-11-2004