In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Revision No. 405 of 2010 Date of Decision:February 11, 2010 Raja Ram ---Petitioner versus State of Haryana ---Respondent Coram: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH *** Present: Mr. Balkar Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner *** GURDEV SINGH, J. This revision by Raj Ram-petitioner, is directed against order dated 9.1.2010 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar, vide which he was charged for the offences under Sections 489-B, 489-C and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, on the grounds mentioned therein. It has been submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that on the date, the FIR was registered, the petitioner was in jail undergoing the sentence imposed upon him in ND&PS, Act and as such there was no question of the recovery of counterfeit currency notes from his possession. It was on the basis of the secret information that FIR was recorded under the above said Sections. Beena Devi-accused was arrested while she was making payment of the price of the goods purchased by her from M/s Kalra Hardware Store. 31 counterfeit currency notes of the Crl. Revision No. 405 of 2010 -2- denomination of 500 each were recovered from her possession. It was during investigation that the present petitioner was arrested and he made a confessional statement in pursuance of which fake currency notes were recovered. At the time of framing of the charge, the trial court was only to see if there was prime facie evidence against the petitioner that he committed the above said offences. A perusal of the impugned order shows that the learned trial court reached that satisfaction before framing of charge. From the evidence collected during investigation, sufficient grounds were found for presuming that the petitioner committed the aforesaid offences. When such is the case, it cannot be said that the impugned order suffers from any illegality or is not correct or that the propriety required that such an order should not have been passed. The same cannot be set aside by exercising revisional jurisdiction. Revision is dismissed accordingly. (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE February 11, 2010 PARAMJIT