drp {1} Cri. Application No.1291/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1291 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.64 OF 2011 Mukatarali s/o Anawarali Sayyad APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.P.R.Katneshwarkar, Advocate for the applicant Mr.N.R.Shaikh, APP for respondent State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 28th March 2011 PER COURT: 1. By the present application, the applicant has prayed for suspension of his substantive sentence of imprisonment for 6 months and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- and compensation of Rs.5 lacs, awarded by JMFC, Chopda in SCC No.427/1998 and confirmed by Ad Hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner in Criminal Appeal No.20/2006, vide order dated 18.03.2011. drp {2} Cri. Application No.1291/2011 2. Heard. It is stated by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant was on bail during the pendency of trial as well as during the pendency of the criminal appeal and is taken in custody on 18.03.2011, when his appeal came to be dismissed. 3. It is also informed that the applicant has, in all, deposited Rs.51,000/- in the lower court and the amount of cheque, allegedly bounced is Rs.3,21,000/- and as per bank extract, the actual dues are Rs.3,06,474-. In view of this, the applicant is directed to be released on bail, on the same terms and conditions on which he was released on bail by the trial court, however on furnishing fresh surety and on executing fresh PR bond. It is specifically directed that the release warrant of the applicant be issued only after the applicant deposits Rs.2 lacs in the trial court. To deposit the amount of Rs.2 lacs in the trial court is a condition president to issue release warrant. Application stands disposed of accordingly. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B10/criapln1291-11 drp {3} Cri. Application No.1291/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.64 OF 2011 Mukatarali s/o Anawarali Sayyad APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.P.R.Katneshwarkar, Advocate for the applicant Mr.N.R.Shaikh, APP for respondent State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 28th March 2011 PER COURT: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Call for Record and Proceedings. List the Revision for admission after receipt of the Record and Proceedings. 3. Parties are put to notice that this revision is likely to be disposed of finally at the stage of admission itself. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B10/criapln1291-11