IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1116 OF 2009 Tilak Sharma Safalya Chs. Ltd. And Anr. ...Petitioners. v. Bombay Municipal Corporation and Ors. ...Respondents. Ms. Minaghi Surve i/by Mr.P.J.Thorat, advs. For the petitioners. Mrs.S.A.Module, adv. For the Respondent No.1/BMC. Mr.G.W.Mattos, AGP for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : MARCH 9, 2010 P.C. 1 By communication of 4.3.2010 respondent has served fresh notice of demand on the petitioners based on their revised policy. Petitioners are willing to pay demand as now revised. 2 On the petitioners paying said amount within three months, the respondent no.3 to issue fresh NOC. On receipt of such NOC, petitioners to make representation to the respondent no.1 in the matter of notice issued to them under Section 53 of the M.R.T.P. Act. Respondent no.1 thereafter to consider the same according to the law and dispose it off. On receipt of the NOC, on the representation made, Corporation to take decision not later than six weeks from the receipt of the application. In the meantime, status-quo as of today to continue. – 2 - 3 With the above observations, petition stands disposed off. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)