1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.02.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P(MD)No.496 OF 2011 D.Suganthi Daisy Rani .. Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City, Trichy. 2.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Trichy District, Trichy. 3.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, West Range, Trichy District. 4.The Correspondent, TELC Primary School, Trichy District. 5.The Chairman, TELC Education Board, Post Box No.86, Tranquebar House, Trichy District. 6.The Inspector of Police, Ponmalaipatti Police Station, Trichy District. 7.Jeeva Jayarani 8.S.Jesudas Arputharaj .. Respondents Prayer: Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the 1st and 6th respondents to consider the petitioner's complaint dated 10.02.2011 and give a suitable protection for enabling her to join in the TELC Primary School, Ponmalaipatti, Trichy District. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Muruganantham For Respondents : Mr.L.Murugan, Govt. Advocate Criminal Side - R1 Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan for RR2,3 and 5 Mr.Ajmal Khan for R4 Mr.M.Siddtharthar for R8 ORDER This petition has been filed to direct the 1st and 6th respondents to consider the petitioner's complaint dated 10.02.2011 and give a suitable protection for enabling her to join in the TELC Primary School, Ponmalaipatti, Trichy District. 2. Heard Mr.D.Muruganantham, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.L.Murugan, learned Government Advocate (criminal side) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 appearing for the 1st respondent and Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 2,3 and 5 and Mr.Ajmal Khan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.4 and Mr.M.Siddharthan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.8. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would restrict his relief only to an extent of the police protection sought for by her to the petitioner's life and limb only. The relief of granting police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner cannot be objected and the police is under the obligation to give police protection to everybody and similarly, the petitioner is also entitled to get police protection for her life and limb. 4.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) has also no objection for granting such a relief of to the petitioner. 5. Therefore, this Court is inclined to pass an order of police protection for the petitioner to her life and limb alone and the 1st and 6th respondents are directed to give police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner. 6.With the above said direction, this petition is ordered. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (C.O) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar (C.S) To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City, Trichy. 2.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Trichy District, Trichy. 3.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, West Range, Trichy District. 4.The Inspector of Police, Ponmalaipatti Police Station, Trichy District. 5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. + 1 cc to Mr.D.Muruganantham, Advocate, SR No.4969 + 1 cc to Mr.M.Ajmal Khan, Advocate, SR No.4897 Crl.O.P(MD)No.496 of 2011 08.02.2011 arul RJ/10.2.11 (IT) 2p/8c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/