IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5027 of 2007 MAHESH KUMAR SINGH Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Banwari Sharma, Advocate Mr. Shiv Kumar, advocate For the respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Central Government Counsel For the respondent no.4 : M/s. Suraj Narayan Yadav & Harish Kumar, Advocates ------- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ---- Dated, the 29th July, 2008 We heard the counsel for the petitioner and perused the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal. 2. Without reiterating the reasons that have been set out by the Tribunal, with which we fully agree, we find no merit in the writ petition. It is highly improbable, if not impossible, that a student who had already secured first division in 1989 would reappear in Matriculation examination after seven years. The contention of the counsel for the petitioner that he may have done for improvement of age is hardly acceptable. 3. Writ petition is dismissed in limine. R.M.Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J. sunil