CRM-M-35954 of 2011 - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-35954 of 2011 Date of Decision:21.12.2011 Amrik Singh and another . . .Petitioners Versus State of Punjab . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.P.S. Shekhon, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.K.D. Sachdeva, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Mr.P.K. Garg, Advocate, for the complainant. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This is a petition for bail pending trial in a case registered vide FIR No.99 dated 15.10.2011 under Sections 365, 353, 332, 333, 511, 148 & 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) at Police Station Moonak, District Sangrur. The FIR is registered by Bimla, who is married to Jagdev Singh and is having two children out of the said wedlock. Her husband had three brothers Jeewan Singh, Devi Dyal and Nanak Dev. In the year, 2004, her husband killed his brother Jeewan Singh and was convicted. Her devrani (Gurmail Kaur) filed a case against her husband and a sum of `11 lacs was awarded to her. It is also alleged that her husband has approximately 2½ killa of land in his name and ½ killa of land other than the above said land was submerged in Ghaggar for which she had received a cheque of `2,35,000/- but since her husband came out on bail and wanted to sell the aforesaid land and withdraw the amount of cheque, therefore, she had filed a Civil Suit in the Court at CRM-M-35954 of 2011 - 2 - Moonak for restraining her husband from withdrawing the cheque and selling the land. She was present in Court in the said case when her husband along with the petitioners had tried to abduct her but she was saved by her other devars Nanak Dev and Raj Kumar sons of Jagroop Singh. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that first petitioner is in custody since 16.10.2010 and the other one is in custody since 19.10.2010. He further submits that challan has already been presented and the petitioners are neither the previous convicts nor any other case is pending against them. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case but without making any observation on the merits, present petition is hereby allowed and the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) DECEMBER 21, 2011 JUDGE Vivek