IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2010 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 10997 of 2010(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- NJANADAS, BLESSY BHAVAN, KUDANGAVILA, KUDANGAVILA P.O., NEYYATTINKARA. BY ADV. MR.G.SUDHEER RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ NEYYATTINKARA MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, NEYYATTINKARA P.O., NEYYATTINKARA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JVT C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ---------------------- W.P.(C) No.10997 of 2010 --------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of April 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner had been working as a Driver (CLR) in the respondent Municipality from 2.8.1999 to 31.5.2005. The grievance of the petitioner is that similarly situated persons were given regularization in service and in fact, according to him, even lesser experienced hands were also given such regularization. Feeling aggrieved by the said arbitrary and discreminatory action in the matter of regularisation, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P4 representation praying for regularization or appointment on regular basis. So far no action has been taken on Ext.P4 representation, it is submitted. 2. Entitlement of the petitioner for regularisation/ appointment on regular basis, in view of the circumstances expatiated above, is a matter to be considered by the W.P.(C) No.10997 of 2010 -2- respondent. In fact, Ext.P4 representation has been filed by the petitioner inviting such consideration. In the circumstances, without making any observation as to the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 representation, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE Jvt