IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23674 of 2009 SANJAY KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 17.09.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner has approached this court seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Sections 406 and 420 of the Penal Code. While petitioner was working as Tax Daroga Nagar Panchayat, Makhdumpur allegation is that he did receive certain advance in respect of different schemes. One of such scheme was not properly executed thereby causing loss to the Government to the tune of Rs. 20,924/-. Referring to the F.I.R., it is contended that the informant himself has noted that an enquiry has to be conducted by constituting a team in relation to the works allegedly executed by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner, referring to the F.I.R. itself, submits that earlier the petitioner had lodged an F.I.R. on 11.09.2008. Subsequently, the petitioner also deposited aforesaid amount of Rs. 20,924 in the account of the Panchayat. It is, thus, contended that a detailed enquiry is still required to be conducted to fix the responsibilities. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of 04 weeks from today, 2 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM, Jehanabad in connection with Makhdumpur P.S.Case no. 39/09, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)