CRIMINAL MISCELLANIOUS NO. 39619 OF 2006 ********* (In the matter of an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ) ******* 1. LALITA SINHA, WIFE OF SHRI AJIT KUMAR SINHA 2. MANISH RANJAN, SON OF SHRI AJIT KUMAR SINHA 3. AJIT KUMAR SINHA, SON OF SHRI PARMESHWAR SINGH ALL RESIDENT OF QUALITY PARADISE, FLAT NO. 305, 3RD FLOOR, ARRAH GARDEN, TAPESHWAR NAGAR, POLICE STATION DANAPUR, PATNA …………………………………………………………….………….PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. PARESH KUMAR, SON OF SHRI RAGHVENDRA VCEDALANKAR, RESIDING AT EAST SHEOPURI, POLICE STATION SHASTRINAGAR, PATNA ………………………………… ……………………….……..OPPOSITE PARTIES ********** FOR THE PETITIONERS :- MR. SUBODH KUMAR SINHA, ADVOCATE FOR O.P. NO. 2 :- MR. ARVIND KUMAR SINGH, ADVOCATE FOR THE STATE :- MR. RAJ BALLABH SINGH, A.P.P. ******* P R E S E N T HON’BLE JUSTICE SMT. SHEEMA ALI KHAN O R D E R Sheema Ali Khan, J. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the complaint petition does not indicate the ingredients of the offences. The prosecution case is that the petitioner had taken a loan from the complainant and he had refused to make payment of the said loan amount. 3. All these aspects may be considered at the stage of discharge. The petitioner is given liberty to raise all these 2 questions at the appropriate stage. 4. This application is accordingly disposed of ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. ) PATNA HIGH COURT DATED, THE 18th APRIL, 2011 N.A.F.R./ANAND