IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9080 of 2009 IMAMUDDIN AJMERI, S/o late Dahari Miyan Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 10.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that a case was pending for firing upon the complainant’s daughter by one Nagendra Rai. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, complainant’s daughter, Mausam was working for petitioner’s Orchestra Party. He was one of the witnesses of the firing incident and there can be no occasion about the petitioner’s having any hand in the snatching of chain or taking away of other articles. So basing the assertion made in the Complaint Petition, petitioner’s arrest cannot be justified. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 1827 of 2007, (Tr. No. 2668 of 2008) above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Pankaj Mishra, J.M., Ist Class, Muzaffarpur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)