1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1289 OF 2003 Union of India & Ors. ..Petitioners. Vs. B.K.Bansode ..Respondent. ... None for the Petitioners. CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : F.I.REBELLO, J. AND F.I.REBELLO, J. AND F.I.REBELLO, J. AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. J. J. 9th January, 2006. P.C. : This Petition is directed against the order passed in Original Application No.239 of 1998. The said Original Application was heard along with Original Application 115 of 1996 and other applications and disposed of by a common order dated 11th April, 2002. 2 The Union of India in Original Application 115 of 1996 had preferred Writ Petition 4368 of 2002 as also other petitions in respect of other Original Applications. Those petitions came to be allowed by a Division Bench of this Court by order dated 14th October, 2004. The present Petition appears not to have been included among the said petitions. It appears that the Petition was dismissed for non-prosecution and thereafter has been restored. None appears for the parties when the matter is called out. However, considering the judgment in Writ Petition 4368 of 2002 and other petitions which were allowed by order dated 14th October, 2004, for the same and similar reasons the present Petition will have to be allowed. In the light of that, rule made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). There shall be no order as to costs. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)