IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16034 of 2009 ASHOK RAI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- Cr.Misc. No.10436 of 2009 GANESHI RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 17.08.2009 Heard learned senior counsel representing the petitioners and learned APP for the State. There are three petitioners who are in custody in Musrigharari P. S. Case No. 142 of 2008 which was registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code including sections 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the allegation made in the FIR, Maheshwar Rai is supposed to have caused farsa blow on the head of Ram Prit Rai and, therefore, his prayer for bail stands rejected. So far allegations against other two petitioners are concerned, there is a general and omnibus allegation that Ashok Rai assaulted with a butt of a gun and Ganeshi Rai with a lathi. It is further contended that on re-examination Ganeshi Rai has not been named as the person who assaulted Ram Prit Rai in his statement under sectioin 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In that view of the matter, let the two petitioners namely, Ashok Rai (of Cr. Misc. No. 16034 of 2009) and Ganeshi Rai (of Cr. Misc. No. 10436 of 2009) be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in - 2 - Musrigharari P S Case No. 142 of 2008 with a direction that petitioners will co-operate in the trial and shall appear on each and every date personally. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)