IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.869 of 2008 SAHEB RAI S/O SRI DAROGA RAI --- PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SURENDRA RAI S/O LATE RAM EKBAL RAI --- OPP. PARTIES. ----------- 03 04.11.2010 Petitioner assails order dated 09.06.2008 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court no IV, Chapra in Sessions Trial no. 70/96. The grievance of the petitioner is that learned trial Court has amended the charge and the defence should be given an opportunity to cross- examine all the witnesses. I have perused the order impugned. Learned trial Court on the basis of materials available on record has found that no charge was altered. In fact, the matter being very old and the documents found in a depleted condition the charges were re-constructed and retyped. It has also found that the defence cross-examined all the witnesses and thereafter statement of the accuseds were recorded under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and matter was posted for final disposal. At a very belated stage, this application was filed on 04.01.2008. The trial Court has, thus, inferred that this was just a ploy to protract the trial. In view of the findings of learned trial Court, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order impugned. The application is dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)