{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.264 OF 2009 Goulanbai Shivram Sangle PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.N.P.Bangar, Advocate for petitioner Mr.B.V.Wagh, AGP for respondent STate ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 7th May 2010 PER COURT: 1. It appears that the AGP has filed affidavit of one Rajesh Rangnathrao Joshi dated 10th December 2009, however the same does not find place on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly conceded that he has received copy of the said affidavit. Today, learned AGP has filed copy of the affidavit on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the statement made in para 5 of the affidavit that the planning department has agreed to sanction amount of rental compensation to the petitioner, which is evident from proposal dated 23.11.2009, {2} the petitioner does not press for any orders in the contempt petition. In the premise, the contempt petition stands disposed of as not pressed. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B10/cp264-09