^mi^^^^^^ ae Si;.;;,Ri - E^^K^II ^tt ll-£l^-3t Lt^ ti^a ^ ^a ^<^ ^ f os S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHAmSGARH) WRIT PETITIONNO'?'^3 ^/2006. PETITIONER: *•'..."' 4^^ ^^"/ ^'°s> '•"'~-:1'.^A-"* ^- ^ .M2?- Respondents ^Kushal Prasad Sahu, son of late Abhinath Sahu, aged about 46 years, Asst, Teacher, Primary School Kalraitikra, Block Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgrah. versus •\ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary School Education Department Ministry D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. The Asst. Commissioner, Schedule /--" Caste Development, Korba, through Block Development Officer, Korba, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/S37 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -.V- ;sss HI6H COURT W CHHATTIS6ARH AT MLASPUR W. P. (S) No. 7638 of 2006 Petitioner : Kushol Prasod Sahu Verais Respondents : Stateof Chhatt-isgnrh and diwther SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Mr. O.P. Sahu, Mvocate for Ihe petitioner. AArs. Anju Ahuka, Deputy Sovemment Advocate for the respondents/State. ORbEft (Passed on -ttiis 15th elay of Jcnwary, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel qapearing for the petitioner as well as teamed Depirty Sowrnment Advocate cppenring for the respondents/Stoite jomtty submit -that the focts of +he present case are similar to that of in W. P. (s) 4725 of 2006 (Amar 5ai Ram ond others Vs. State of Chhatt-isgwh & others), which wus disposed of vide order dated 1.9.2006. They further aibmit that the question of ICMI involved is also the snme. 2. In view of the above stated aibmissions made by tedimed counset for the parties, the writ petition is diqiosed of in terms of 1he order dnted 1.9.2006 pofised by this Courl- in W. P. (s) 4725 of 2006. No order as to costs. Bablu sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge