IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD MARCH 2010 / 12TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 37221 of 2009(W) -------------------------- OA.308/2006 of DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER --------------- T.K.VASUDEVAN PILLAI, SALEELA BUILDING, VYTTILA, COCHIN-19. BY ADV. SRI.JESWIN P.VARGHESE RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE RECOVERY OFFICER, THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE FEDERAL BANK LTD., ERNAKULAM (SOUTH) BRANCH, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PUNALUR VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 37221 OF 2009 ......................................................................... Dated this the 3rd March, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has approached this Court seeking for a direction to the first respondent DRT to defer the proceedings of auction sale of the schedule property in O.A.No.308 of 2006, till orders are passed by the Tribunal on Ext.P1 application for setting aside the ex parte order. A further prayer is also there, to direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to enter into the O.A. schedule property without orders from the DRT. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner has placed reliance on the proceedings of the concerned respondent (first respondent) as extracted in paragraph Nos. 2 and 3 of the Writ Petition. 3. The learned Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 submits that the steps taken at the instance of the first respondent to prepare a sketch and to W.P.(C) No. 37221 OF 2009 2 demarcate the extent of 30 cents, were pursued on the basis of the order issued prior to the issuance of interim stay and it is assured before this Court that no further steps will be taken unless and until appropriate orders are issued by the DRT. In the above facts and circumstances, the assurance and undertaking is recorded and the Writ Petition is disposed of, holding that all further proceedings shall be pursued only in accordance with the orders to be passed by the DRT in O.A.No. 308 of 2006. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk