C/€\m7/’ ”Miw $¢i§§g¥3H J IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (s) No. \©\°> /2o11 PETITIONER REsPONDENTs y 1/ SmT. Chanduni Kushwuhu, W/o Shri Ugmsen Kushwaha, aged abouT 41 years, R/o ViHuge Devancxgar, Tahsil Suajpur', Dish‘. Surguja (6.6.) VER$U$ STa‘re of ChhaT‘risgar‘h, Through : Secretory, Public Health, Depar‘rmen‘r, Manfralaya, D.K.5. Bhawan Raipur, District Raipur (C.6.) DirecTor‘, Health Services Raipur, DisTT. Raipur‘ (6.6.) Chief Medical and Healfh Officer, Ambikapur‘, Surguja, Dish”. Surguja (6.6.) Block Medical Officer, Ramanuj Nagar, Tahsil Surajpur', DisT’r. Surguja (6.6.) Sfa‘re of Chhaffisgarh, Through— The Secrefary, General Adminisfrafion Deparfmeni, Sfa’re of Chhaffisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, DisTric‘r : Raipur (6.6.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONsTITUTION OF INDIA . The peTiTioner, named above, mosf humbly and respecffuliy begs To SubmiT as under:- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 1019 OF 2011 Petitioner Smt. Chandani Kushwaha Versus Respondent State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETlTlON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (sB : Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present :- Shri Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Dy. Advocate General for the State. ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 23' day of February, 201 1) The petitioger impugns the transfer order dated 15.7.2010 (Annexure P-1), whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Sub Health Center, Kamalpur, Ramanujnagar to Sub Heatth Center, Karamdiha, Wadrafnagar, within the same District on administrative grounds. Leaned counsel appearing for the petitioner questions the legality and validity of the order on a simple ground that the petitioner is a lady, thus, she cannot attend the new transfer place, which is about 170 kms away from the present place of posting. The grounds raised by the petitioner is no ground so far as interference with the transfer of an employee is concerned. lt is well settled principle of law that the Court should not interfere with the transfer matter except in cases, wherein the malafide or lack of competence of the authorities passing the order or infringement of rules and regulations governing the service condition are established. This is not the case in this matter, thus, the petition is bereft of merit. ln view of foregoing, the writ petition is dismissed at the motion stage itself. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok Sd/-