IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 16197 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 26.09.2011 Ram Dass ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ..Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. S.K. Monga, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. RAJESH BINDAL, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner, who was Numberdar of the Village had recovered ` 20,351.85 from complainant-respondent No.2 as Tawan (Penalty) and Abhiana (Water Tax) and deposited that same with the State on 27.05.2002. A complaint was filed by respondent No.2-complainant on January 20, 2006 alleging that the petitioner had been cheated him by not depositing the amount received from him in the Treasury. Further in terms of the interim order passed by this Court on 25.5.2011, the petitioner has already appeared before the learned court below and furnished his bail bonds. The fact that the petitioner after recovery of the amount from the complainant had deposited the same with the Treasury is not disputed by the learned counsel for the State. After considering the aforesaid submissions, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 25.05.2011, is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 26.09.2011 sharmila