9V C9 15 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR: CHHATTISGARH Mlsc.APpEAL N0. €WT0F zoos 3INGLE BENCH Avinash , Versus PK (/s Didvyania Exim Pvt. Ltd., Salem Road, Raipur Through its Managing Director, Sitaram Didwania, aged about 49 years, S/o Kishanlai Didwania, R/o Samta Colony, Raipur, Teh. & Distt. Raipur. APPEAL UNDER ORDER i3 RULE 1 (r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE was Respondent “Plaintiff M [I gagml‘la‘rEolugiz-adP'artner J Ashok Kumar Smghama, ’30. S/o Virdichand Singhania, wa- “ma“‘wQgv 0..? 59’ Avinash Builders, G.E. Road, Mahoba Bazar Raipur (Chhattisgarh) F\ m’ainiai aq2om/ 311%W (W) * ‘mmmanéa ,,{‘ ’. 7‘ V SB. Hon’ble Shri Justice N.K. Ag arwal 06i04. 2010 V-mmwm11'wm amt%qanau Sahu appegrs on behalf of Shfi PF: V Patankar, Adv. for respondent. Shri Bajaj submits that ir View ‘of compromise betwee the parties, the appeal ha become infructuous. Accordingly, the appeal i dismiseed as having becom infructuous. No order asto cost Sd/— r N.K. Agrawal Judge l l .f.éw. Shri Sumesh Bajaj Advocate for appeliant. Shri Ashish Surana