/@ 3%?!IGLE §E§é£§~5 BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION [OI NOéLié! OF 2011 PETITIONERS 1. Smt. Kanta Agrawal W/o Late Shri Natwar Lal Agrawal, Aged about 50 years, Occupation ~ House Wife, Ashish S/o Late Natwar Lal Agrawal, aged about 23 years, Occupation — Business, Both R/o .Mukesh Traders, Opposite of Main‘ Hospital, Ram ’Niwas Talkies Chowk, Raigarh, Tahsil 8a District— Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS / V ——-— l] State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Urban Administration and Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, RESPONDENTS ,' /Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) f 2] Municipal Corporation, Raigarh, Through~ Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raigarh, / Tahsll &, District— Raigarh (CO). 3] The Collector, Raigarh Raigarh (C.G.). TION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF " DIA FOR ISSUENCE OF WRIT OR WRITS, ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMDTANCES OF THE CASE. k 1.. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONERIS) : As mentioned in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS ABOUT‘THE'RESPONDENWS} : As mentioned in the cause title. w x , / I I I déx’S’r-l CGURT GF SHHATTESGARH : BIL$S?UR WR§T PETWON {t3} Na. 6%? GF ’251‘. ?E?i":’§GNER3 3m; Kaiia AGE‘awa! 1% Am€h§r Ejersus RESFGNDEN?S Sia‘xe of Ch‘naftisgarh & Others {Wrii Peti‘tioa uncéer Airticie 226 of the Consiiiu‘tbn of india) Single Bench : Han’bie SM Satish K. Agnihotfi, J. 95a3em :- 8hr: Sania$h Kumar aiwaii, Advocate for the petiticners. $hr§ PKBhaduri, Panei Lawyer fer the Statef respendents Na? & 3. S; E'i Hgiixgrawai, Senior Advegate Mt'n Ms. Meera Jaiswai, Advoca‘ie #‘Gr im respondent No.2. GRDER {Passed or: this. 1E day of November, 2m 1.} a ’1. Learneéi counsei appearing for the pefitieners submiis that the eetiéienere have net received any n0t§ce m reenec’i of the petitien scheduied iand, however, the pmeess 0f demo§itien has already iaken piaee by fhe reseona‘eni N62. 2. At thiejuncmre, Sim Bhaduri, iearned Panei Lawyer appearing for the 3mm and Shri Agrawai, ieamed counsei appearing for the respondent No.2 eubmii that no demoiition on tine pert of the {espendem auiheii'ziee ehaii be taken witheiit foiiowing ihe due precese of law. E. ‘m View 9f ihe above, according i0 ihe ieamed ceLmsei apseaiing for the petiiieners nething sewivee in ii‘iis peiiiion for acijuaiicaiieii, a” i’riis etaee. 5;. Accerdiagiy, ihe \wiii pe’iiiion i3 ciispoeeci of. ‘ Sd/- Satish K, Agnihotri Judge ashok