IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13704 of 2008 ***** 1. SUBASH YADAV & 2. SINDHU DEVI ………………… Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR …. Opp. Parties. ----------- 2. 01.5.2008. Heard. Allegation against the petititoners is that they collected commission from two farmers while allowing payment of subsidy to them. It is the case in the F.I.R. that in respect of one such subsidy, petitioner no. 1 collected commission in the capacity of husband of the Mukhiya and, in respect of other, petitioner no. 2 in her capacity as Mukhiya collected the commission. The F.I.R. was not filed by the farmers, who were allegedly compelled to pay commission. The F.I.R. has not been lodged under the Prevention of Corruption Act. In the circumstances I think a case for grant of anticipatory bail has been made out. The application is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender of the petitioners within six weeks from today, the petitioners, namely, - 2 - Subash Yadav and Sindhu Devi shall be released on bail on their furnishing bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Sarmera P.S. Case No. 67/07 subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Proceducre. dk ( Barin Ghosh, J. )