IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.368 of 2011 JITENDRA MOHAN, SON OF PARMANAND SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 04.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Chandauti P.S. Case No. 113 of 2010 registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the First Information Report nor anything has been recovered from his possession. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that one Dharmendra Kumar, who happens to be brother-in-law of the petitioner, had purchased four mobiles under family pack scheme of the company and subsequently, he handed over one set of mobile to the petitioner. Furthermore, it appears from the impugned order that some call details were found in stolen mobile and it was detected that the said Dharmendra Kumar had talked with co-accused and furthermore, one spy disclosed this fact that petitioner was seen loitering near the place of occurrence. Apart from the aforesaid circumstances, there is nothing against the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as period of detention of the petitioner in jail custody above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with above stated Chandauti P.S. Case No. 113 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)