IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5413 of 2009 SHANKAR PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 28.04.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner has been suspended by an order dated 6.12.2008. It is submitted that despite passage of more than three months no charges have been framed much less served upon the petitioner. The oath to the writ application has been affirmed within three months in February 2009. The writ application is therefore disposed with the observation that in pursuance of the order of suspension dated 6.12.2008 if the charges have not been framed within a period of three months and served upon the petitioner, the respondents are obliged to act in accordance with Rule 9(7) of the Bihar (C.C.A.) Rules 2005. If any order of extension of the period of suspension has been passed within the period of three months the respondents are obliged to proceed thereafter in accordance with Rule 9(7) for framing of charges within the extended period failing which the consequences as mandated for under Rule 9(7) with regard to the order of suspension shall follow. The writ application stands disposed off. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)