Petitioner nit. Pritibala Taunk, W/o Shri Pradeep Kumar Taunk, Aged about 44 years, Working as Assistant Professor (Department Of Physics), in Government Digvijay College Rajnandgaon, District —Rajnandgaon, R/o Behind Mundra Kunj, R.K.Nagar, G.E. Road, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Respondents Versus /State of Chhattisgarh, through The Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Directorate of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) w” The Principal, Government Digvijay College Rajnandgaon, District — Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 1. r; WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ) BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(S)No. M'sgé /2ooq $§ag§e Beash HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGH AT BILASPUR (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) Writ Petition (S) No. 43360f 2009 PETITIONER Smt. Pritibala Taunk VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and others. Shri Manish Sharma counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur Dy. AG for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA O R D E R (13.08.2009) With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. Grievance of the petitioner in this petition is that despite the orders passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in the identical matters being WP. No. 4863/2001 and W.P. No. 2620/2006 (S) (Annexure P-9) the petitioner has not been granted the selection grade and senior pay scale. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction may be issued to the respondents/authorities that if the petitioner makes a representation detailing her grievances therein, the same shall be decided expeditiously. To this submission of the counsel for the petitioner, counsel for the respondents/State has no objection. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the authorities concerned that if the petitioner makes a representation within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same shall be decided within a further period of two months from the date of its receipt in the light of the aforementioned decisions ofthe High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge