IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 18481 of 2011 Date of Decision: 12.10.2011 Devender Sindhu ...Petitioner Versus Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak and another ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT Present : Mr. Rose Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Manik Bakshi, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. J.P.Rana, Advocate for Mr. Sanjiv Bansal, Advocate, for respondent No.3. **** SURYA KANT, J.(Oral) The petitioner has filed this petition essentially seeking implementation of an order said to have been passed by Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak. In my considered view, the writ petition for such a relief is not maintainable as the High Court is not to exercise its jurisdiction to act as an Executing Court for implementation of the orders passed by the University. In case, respondent No.3 college has failed to comply with the lawful directions issued by the University, it is obligatory for the latter to take appropriate action against the college to ensure that the authority of the University is not undermined by an affiliated college. Consequently, the University is directed to take necessary steps in accordance with law within a period of one month. With the aforesaid liberty and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. 12.10.2011 (SURYA KANT) 'ravinder' JUDGE