\06 ^ ^^ ^•^^' ^• :^sw^^,,..... y^wvsK^-:-v""" .**'* .-> w F: B. ^ ^"fc ^i^Se^.! IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. N0. ^T'2> OF 2Q06 PETITIONER VERSUS Shivlal Patra, S/o Late Shri Biharilal Patra, Aged about 31 years, R/o Village Munjhar, Tahsil Devbhog District Raipur (C.G.) RESPOJMDENTS /^o. 6^ ^ A. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary Education Deparetment, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) ^ 2. District Education Officer, District Raipur (C.G.) ^--3. Block Education Officer, Devbhog District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS OR APPROPRIATATE ORDER/DIRECTION ETC XI-HC-22 an^I'^1 l<-li<* 3D^I sfiiro'Hft^T -I- 'S'g'•:qF(RTO, 'a^TH®.(«(cil'Mll< tfrwfrgTWfl^ ^L.^.l01' fq^ST' sn^r wnwdfed tjie uadn Shn BhasKarPayasni, coi ShriA.S. Kachhawana, D\ it is noted that the Vakai^ notcontain the complete detaiis. submits that he may be meniioning ine complete aetail; mayao so. Heard. Learnea counsei ror petitioner's father, who was vj Govemment Schooi, Bandi during seivice period on 2-3-2p appliea ror compassionate app< further submined that No.1322/2002 invoiving the s^l passed by this Court on 20/12qc may t>e passed in tnis case aisoj Leamea counsei ror me ract ana states tnat me titate of to consiaer tne cases OT on or after 1/11/1997 stricfiyl prevaient at mat time. In view of .the submis^ appeanng ror mepanies, wimc|t merits ofthecase, in the opinicti jnsel for the petitioner. y. uovt. Aavocate for tne ytate. (tnama flted Dy the petitioner cioes [Learned counsel for the petitioner perfnittea 10 correct tne same oy as per the requirement. Let he 2DOO in fclatch same 20/12/a00 depend^nts ^PlfeT^'WRff ^ -feist ^SRSR ^slPtnaiT^l petitiooer suiamits mat me orking as Assistant Teacher in i, uevDnog, uismct Kaipur, aiea and thereafter the petitioner lintment which was denied. it is of cases bearing Vv'.P. quesiion orders haye been i5. He prays that similar orders ptate does not dispute the above ;nnattisgarn has taKen a aecision of those empioyses who died i.n accordance with the poiicy icns maae Dy iearnea counsei jt expressing any opinion on tne of this Court, ends of justice wiii [^^34 -t XI-HC-22 ^3 '^TRRPI, %Tllti<l(o, isKII'My SII^T^I R-ti'* 3fl§W ai*i 'dfS'iT Qn\fyn tv /^ 'T^^ KINWT S()W% Tra^ / . 1^/> 5-^Jo<o "M aii^i ^SIISR'afes 1. ch1£ri<?T'tfrrT'RH^T ^ f^st ^l'RR i? sipgit ail^r be served if a direction is given lio the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities concerned to con^ider and decide the' case of the petitioner in accordance with th^ policy prevalent at the time of death of his father. !r the petjti(>ner round eligibie, oraers wiii be issued aseariy as diossibie preferabiywithina period OT rour montns. ine petftioner 00-0peration to the authorities coun. With tne aforesaid ob; aisposea OT. Consequentiy, i.A.No.154^ Certified copy as per ruiesl Copy to the Siate coi| is also directea to render due made clear tnat if any grievance stiii remains, the p^titioner may avaii the remedy avaiiabie under ihe iaw inciudinj fiiing of the petition before this ervations, this petition stands i/2006 also stands disposed of. affer correcting tne vaKaiatnama. nsel, wno wiii oe oDiigea to communicate tn'e order to the resl^ondents for compiiancs. Sd/- Fakhruddm Judge [^tfa^