IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 42 of 2011 (PIL) Mukesh Prasad Bahuguna and others ….…… Petitioners Versus Union of India and others ……….Respondents Ms. Pushpila Bisht, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pradeep Joshi, Standing Counsel for the Union of India / respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. J.P. Joshi, Chief Standing Counsel for the State / respondent No. 3. Date of Judgment: 18.07.2011 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. BARIN GHOSH, C.J. (ORAL) In as much as material particulars are lacking to sustain the writ of mandamus, sought for herein, learned counsel appearing in support of the writ petition seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to re- approach the Court with appropriate and sufficient materials for the selfsame purpose. 2. Such leave is granted. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. (V.K. Bist, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 18.07.2011 18.07.2011 Amit