IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.462/2006 In S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.462/2006 Date of Order ::: 04.10.2006 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Vimal Chaudhary, Counsel for petitioners #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri Vimal Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the respondent has already handed over the vacant and peaceful possession of rented premises on 3rd of October, 2006, but the due rent has not been paid by the defendant-respondent. In view of the statement of Shri Vimal Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioners, to the effect that substantial compliance of the order has already been made, I do not want to take any cognizance of the contempt petition. It will be open for the petitioners to recover the due rent by filing execution petition before the executing court. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the contempt petition is disposed of. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//