HON’BLE SHRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT APPEAL No. 29 of 2008 Dated: 28-01-2008 Between: Alapati Arundhathi …Appellant AND Commissioner of Intermediate Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and others …Respondents JUDGMENT: (Per Anil R. Dave, CJ) Heard the learned Advocates. The appellant-petitioner had challenged the order dated 12-1-2007 passed by respondent No.2 in writ petition No.1111 of 2007. By virtue of the impugned order passed by respondent No.2, the management of Alapati Subbarayudu Memorial Girl’s Junior College, Ponnur, Guntur District (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Girl’s Junior College’) was placed under suspension till the management was reconstituted. Upon hearing the learned Advocates and looking to the impugned order, the learned single Judge did not find any merit in the petition and therefore, the petition has been dismissed by an order dated 14-12-2007. We have heard the learned Advocates appearing for the concerned parties and have gone through the order passed by the learned single Judge as well as the impugned order passed by respondent No.2, whereby the management of the aforesaid Girl’s Junior College has been suspended. We find that there was a justifiable reason for which the management was placed under suspension by respondent No.2. Prima facie, there appears to be slackness in supervision by the management. It is pertinent to note that it is for the society managing the Girl’s Junior College to reconstitute its management. The moment the management is reconstituted, the order of suspension would come to an end. It is also pertinent to note that the petition as well as the appeal have been filed by the Secretary and Correspondent of the Girl’s Junior College. As a matter of fact, the management should have filed the petition as well as the appeal for the reason that the present appellant has already been kept under suspension. Of course, the learned Advocate appearing for the appellant has submitted that for some time, the order of suspension of the Secretary and Correspondent had been stayed. Looking to the facts of the case, in our opinion, the learned single Judge has rightly dismissed the writ petition. We do not find any substance in this appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J 28th January, 2008 Note: Issue copy in one week. /B.O/ GRR