1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3315/2010 ( The Secretary, State of Maharashtra and others -: VERSUS :- Tilaksingh T. Suryawanshi ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri D.B. Patel, A.G.P. for petitioners. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JULY 28, 2010. Heard Shri Patel, learned A.G.P. for petitioners. Challenge is to order dated 16/1/2006 whereby learned Member of Industrial Court rejected Miscellaneous U.L.P. No.2/2006 holding that it has no power to review. The original order of Industrial Court is dated 9/8/2005 and by it it is directed that petitioner be brought on C.R.T.E. Learned A.G.P. invites attention to paragraphs 10 and 11 of writ petition to explain the latches and contends that Irrigation Department is not an 'Industry' and hence order is without jurisdiction. I perused the paragraphs 10 and 11. Same show that after order was passed on 16/1/2006 proposal was moved on 12/4/2006 and then the proposal was reviewed in meeting held on 26/7/2007 and a communication was forwarded on 26/7/2008. Law and Judiciary Department by 2 communication dated 27/7/2009 granted permission. Thus all steps taken are after the gap of one year. I am therefore, not satisfied with the explanation as given. The judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board V/s. Rajappa A.I.R. 1978 S.C.548 still holds field and reference by Constitution Bench on issue to a larger Bench does not mean that judgment is stayed. I am therefore, not in a position to accept the contention that Irrigation Department is not an Industry. Writ petition is therefore, rejected. No order as to costs. JUDGE Tambaskar.