1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3785 OF 2009 Tanaji Premraj Gunjale & another Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.V.D.Sapkal, advocate for petitioners. Mr.N.H.Borade, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 to 4. Mr.S.S.Dande, advocate for Respondent No.5. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 03rd December, 2009. P.C.: 1 The challenge raised in this petition is in respect of recording of mutation entries. 2 It transpires from record that certain civil litigations are pending in the shape of Regular Civil Suit Nos.1007/1997, 998/1997 and 62/2001 before the competent Civil Court. It is well established that revenue entries are recorded for fiscal purposes and those are not in itself evidence of right, title or entitlement of the parties. The revenue entries, those are recorded, are obviously subject to final determination of the rights of parties by the competent Civil Court. 2 3 In this view of the matter, no interference is called for in the instant writ petition. Writ Petition, therefore, stands rejected. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/wp378509