: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4010 OF 2009 Lalchand Pooranlal Khanagwal. ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Union of India & 2 ors. ... Respondents Mr. V.Z. Kankaria for the petitioner. Ms. Nilam Jadhav with Mr. Sureshkumar for the respondents No.1 to 3. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 7TH SEPTEMBER, 2009. P.C.: 1. The petitioner was an employee of the Western Railways and he was allotted official quarters. The petitioner was dismissed from service on 27th February, 1992 after holding an enquiry. The petitioner has impugned the said dismissal by filing Original Application in the Central Administrative Tribunal at Mumbai. Since the petitioner was not entitled to occupy the official quarters on account of his dismissal, proceedings under the Public Premises Act were initiated before the competent authority i.e. the Estate : 2 : Officer. The competent authority, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, passed an order on 24th October, 2007, directing eviction of the petitioner. The petitioner challenged the said order passed by the competent authority by filing the statutory appeal before the City Civil Court, Mumbai being Misc. Appeal No.11 of 2008. The City Civil Court has rejected the said Appeal by the impugned judgment and order dated 4th March, 2009. 2. We have considered the orders passed by the competent authority as well as by the City Civil Court. It is undisputed that the petitioner has been dismissed from service on 27th February, 1992 and, therefore, the petitioner has no right to be in occupation of the official quarters. We are of the view that the reasons assigned by both, the competent authority as well as the City Civil Court, cannot be faulted with. In that view of the matter, no case for interference is made out. Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- (R.M. SAVANT, J.) (S.B. MHASE, J.)