IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 17346 of 2007 Between: 1 Premchand Lachman Jaisingh S/o.Lachmandas R/o.5-1, Surya Mansion,10.2.179, West Maredpally,Hyderabad- 500026 2 Ramchand Lachamn Jaisingh S/o.Lachamandas R/o.5-1, Surya Mansion,10.2.179, West Maredpally,Hyderabad- 500026 3 Shyamalal Asrani S/o.Atmaram R/o.Asrani Hotel, James Street, Secunderabad 4 Shyam Jumani S/o.Tikan Jumani R/o.Anthaipally village, Shameerpet Mandal R.R.District 5 M/s.Grandville Realtors Pvt Ltd., rep.by its Chairman M.V.Narendranath Reddy, S/o.Chandra Sekhar Reddy R/o.3-44, Street No.5, Habsiguda, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Land Acquisition officer, Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, 1-8-323, Paigah Palace, Police lines, Rasoolpura, Secunderabad 2 Vice Chairman, Hyderabad Urban Development Authority 1-8-323, PaigahPalace, Police Lines, Rasoolpura Secunderabad 3 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by the Secretary to Government Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, secretariat, Hyderabad 4 The District collector, Ranga Reddy District Lakdikapool, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction or order declaring the Notification under Sec.4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act published in AP Gazette Extra Ordinary , RR.No.58,dated Friday 1st August, 2003 and the Draft Declaration notified under Sec.6 of the Act notified in the AP Gazette Extra Ordinary, RR.No.66 dated Tuesday the 31st August, 2004 as null and void. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.V.BHANU PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 17346 of 2007 O R D E R: Learned counsel appearing on both sides fairly conceded that the issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition is squarely covered by an order of this Court in W.P. No. 17753 of 2006 dated 24.9.2007. Therefore, this writ petition is also allowed in the light of the above order-dated 24.9.2007 in W.P. No. 17753 of 2006 and accordingly the notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act on 1.8.2003 and the declaration published under Section 6 of the Act on 31.8.2004, to the extent of the lands of the petitioners, are liable to be set aside and are accordingly set aside. C.V. RAMULU, J. Date: 18.3.2009. MVB.