IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3940 of 2009 Decided on: 5.12.2011. Puran Dutt ..Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ..Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Mr. B. Nandan Vashisht, Advocate. For the respondents : Mrs. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy AG. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : It is jointly represented by the parties that the present lis is covered by the judgment dated 5.7.2010, rendered by this Court in CWP(T) No. 5759 of 2008. 2. Consequently, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner also in view of the principle laid down in the judgment cited hereinabove, within a period of six weeks after the production of certified copy of this judgment. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 5, 2011 (kalpana) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No