IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 689 of 2009 Between: Burra Srinivas, S/o. Laxmirajam, R/o. 12-10-26, Sardar Nagar, Sirsilla Proper & mandal, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Circle Inspector of Police, Sirisilla, Karimnagar District. 2 Burra Rajeswari, W/o. late Laxmi Rajam, R/o. 12-10-26, Sardar Nagar, Sirsilla Proper & Manal, Karimnagar District. 3 Dadigela Kishan Rao, S/o. Rajeswara Rao, R/o. China Bonala(V), Sirsilla Manal, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in calling the petitioner to police station and confining him in the police station and threatening to execute Sale Deed in favor of 3rd respondent or his representative in respect of his house property bearing No.12-10-26, situated at Sardar Nagar, Sirisilla Town & (M), Karimnagar District., as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and consequently direct the 1st respondent herein not to call the petitioner to the Police Station and not to threaten and confine him in the lockup for executing Sale Deed in favor of 3rd Respondent or his nominee in respect of house bearing No.12-10-26, Sardar nagar, Sirisilla Proper & Mandal, Karimnagar District. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.V.RAMANA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.689 of 2009 ORDER: Questioning the action of the 1st respondent in calling the petitioner to police station, confining him in the police station and threatening him to execute a sale deed in favour of the 3rd respondent or his representative, in respect of the house property bearing No.12-10-26 situated at Sardar Nagar, Sircilla Town and Mandal, Karimnagar District, the present writ petition is filed. A counter affidavit has been filed by the 1st respondent-Circle Inspector of Police, Sirsilla, Karimnagar District, denying all the allegations made against him. The 1st respondent, in his counter affidavit, also stated that he neither summoned the petitioner to the police station nor threatened him to cause registration in favour of the 3rd respondent, in respect of the house property as alleged by the petitioner in the affidavit, at any point of time. He also stated that he never confined the petitioner in the lockup. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, asserts the averments made by the 1st respondent as false. In view of the above, the writ petition is closed, as no further orders are necessary. At this stage, the counsel appearing for the petitioner sought liberty to avail the appropriate remedies under law, in appropriate proceedings, against the 1st respondent herein, who detained him in illegal custody. If the law permits, he is at liberty to do so. No costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA,J 12.02.2009 v v