HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.16979 of 2010 Dated: 16-07-2010 Between: Nalluri Nagakrishna Paramathma Subba Rao. … Petitioner And The Tahsildar, Jangareddygudem Mandal & others. … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.16979 of 2010 ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks directions by way of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents 1 to 3 in taking steps to cancel the pattedar passbooks and title deeds issued in his name, so as to grant in the name of the 4th respondent’s daughter, to an extent of Ac.11-29 cents of land in Sy.Nos.205 and 206 of Kethavaram village of Jangareddygudem Mandal in West Godavari District. It is stated that the petitioner and the husband of respondent No.4 are brothers. Petitioner is in possession to an extent of Ac.1.51 cents in Sy.No.205 and Ac.4.13 cents in Sy.No.206, totally admeasuring Ac.5.64 cents, and it is stated that already pattedar passbooks and title deeds are issued in favour of the petitioner. In this writ petition, it is the grievance of the petitioner that though he was rightly issued the aforesaid title deeds and pattedar passbooks, respondents are taking steps to issue pattedar passbooks and title deeds in the name of the 4th respondent’s daughter, by entertaining the application of the 4th respondent. As of now, even according to the petitioner, no notice is issued to him, and the pattedar passbooks and title deeds, which are already issued to the petitioner, cannot be cancelled without issuing notice to him. Even before issuing any notice, on apprehension of cancellation, the petitioner approached this Court. In that view of the matter, I do not find any ground to entertain this writ petition, at this stage. However, if any such move is made on the part of respondents 1 to 3, it is open for the petitioner to file objections before the competent authority. I am sure that if any such objections are filed by the petitioner, respondents shall look into the same and pass appropriate orders. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 16th July 2010 ajr