IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12204 of 2005 1. Md. Moinul Haque Son of Md. Shamsul Haque, Resident of Mohalla- Milki Anaith, Police Station- Nawada Ara, Post Office- Nawada, District- Bhojpur. 2. Noor Ayesha Khatoon widow of Late Md. Saif-Ul- Haque 3. Md. Ekramul Haque, Minor son of late Md. Saif-Ul- Haque. 4. Sakra Bano Minor Daughter of late Md. Saif-Ul- Haque 5. Md. Israr Ul Haque Minor son of Late Md. Saiful Haque 6. Sania, Minor daughter of late Md. Saiful Haque. Resident of Mohalla- Milki Anaith, Police Station- Nawada Ara, Post Office- Nawada, Distrcit- Bhojpur. Versus 1. Mansoor Aalam Son of Late Rubiuddin Aalam, Resident of Mohalla- Milki Anaith Police Station- Nawada Ara, Post Office- Nawada, District- Bhojpur. 2. Mahboob Alam Son of Late Leyakat Ali Resident of Mohalla –Milki Anaith, Police Station- Nawada, Ara, Post Office- Nawada, District- Bhojpur. ---------------------------------- 6. 14.11.2011 I.A. No. 5749 of 2010 This application has been filed for substitution of heirs of petitioner no. 2 who died during the pendency of the writ petition on 1.7.2008. In view of the above, let the name of petitioner no. 2 be expunged and substituted by persons named in paragraph no. 2 of the present application. I.A. No. 5749 of 2010 accordingly stands allowed. Heard Md. Ataul Haque for the petitioners. The writ petition has been filed for quashing of the order dated 19.8.2005 passed by the 2 Additional District Judge (F.T.C.) Ist, Ara, Bhojpur in M.A. No. 22 of 2005. By the order impugned the injunction granted by order dated 7.5.2005 by the Second Munsif in Title Suit No. 117 of 2004 had been set aside. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the suit was filed for restraining the respondents (defendants) from making construction leading to obstructing the entry of the petitioners into their house. It is submitted that the defendants have built a wall closing the door of the petitioners. It is further submitted that the said wall has been made on the land of the petitioners. Initially the injunction was granted by order dated 7.5.2005 but in appeal the same has been set aside by order dated 19.8.2005 which is under challenge. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the injunction was for restraining the defendants from making any further construction of the wall in question. In view of passage of time, this Court does not feel that there is much substance in deciding the matter with regard to injunction or maintaining of status quo. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off with a direction to the 5th Sub-Judge, Ara before whom the matter is presently pending to 3 expedite the proceedings and dispose off Title Suit No. 117 of 2004 within nine months positively from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before the Court concerned. Anand Kr. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)