IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Crl. Misc. No. M-9810 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:27.01.2011 Veena Mahotra and another .....Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. F.S. Virk, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. AG, Punjab. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) This petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioners, namely, Veena Mahotra and Aman Verma @ Amanjot Verma, for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect their lives and personal liberty and also for direction to respondent No.4 to 6 not to interfere in the personal life and liberty of the petitioners. Notice of motion was issued on 01.04.2010. In response thereto, reply on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 has been filed and is taken on record. Ms. Rajni Gupta, learned counsel for the State submits that statement of petitioner No.2 was recorded on 30.6.2010, which is annexed as Annexure R.1/T wherein it has been stated that both the petitioners have separated themselves as divorce has taken place and they are residing at their respective places. Crl. Misc. No. M-9810 of 2010 (O&M) -2- In view of the reply filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 as well as statement of petitioner No.2, no further action is required to be taken in the petition and the same has become infructuous. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. January 27, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE