IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 23rd day of March, 2010 Ist Bail Application No. 349 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Vinod Kumar .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No. 221/2009, U/s 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, PS Doiwala, District Dehradun. _______________________________________________________________ March 23, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mr. VP Bahuguna, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant submitted that the allegation made against the applicant that he twice sold the same land is not correct. He submitted that both the sale deeds were executed by the applicant but the land was different. He also filed the copies of both the sale deeds and argued that in both the sale deeds, the area and boundary of both the land are different and the averments made in the FIR are not correct and the same is evident from the contents of the sale deeds. He also submitted that the applicant is in jail since 1.2.2010, who has not committed any fraud. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR; perusal of copies of both the sale deeds filed and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Vinod Kumar be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 23.3.2010 PRABODH 2