HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.27856 and 28117 of 2011 WRIT PETITION No.27856 of 2011 Date:15.12.2011 Between: Shahana Ahmed and three others. ..... Petitioners And: The Collector, Hyderabad District And another. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Vijay B.Paropkari Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Land Acquisition AND WRIT PETITION No.28117 of 2011 Date:15.12.2011 Between: S.A.Satya Prasad Choudhary And two others. ..... Petitioners And: The Collector, Hyderabad District And another. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Vijay B.Paropkari Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Land Acquisition The Court made the following: ORDER: These two Writ Petitions are filed assailing declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the Act’). At the hearing, learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition, representing the respondents, fairly conceded that in Writ Petition No.30620 of 2011, this Court has considered various aspects relating to holding of enquiry under Section 5-A of the Act and held that the order passed in the enquiry under Section 5-A of the Act without calling for remarks from the requisitioning department is not sustainable in law. As the grievance of the petitioners in these two Writ Petitions is identical to that of the petitioners in Writ Petition No.30620 of 2011, these two Writ Petitions are allowed in terms of the order, dated 01.12.2011, passed in the said Writ Petition with the direction that the reasons and directions contained therein shall form part of this order. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petitions, interim orders, dated 12.10.2011 and 14.10.2011, are vacated and W.P.M.P.Nos.34356 and 34687 of 2011 are disposed. _____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 15thDecember 2011 DR