IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-17054 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 2nd June, 2011 Jyoti and another … Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Ramesh Sindhar, Advocate for the petitioners. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that FIR No.89 dated 04.08.2010 (Annexure P-1) registered at Police Station Division No.3, Jalandhar under Section 304-B IPC be quashed. Learned counsel has contended that for the death of one Ranjit Kaur, the impugned FIR (Annexure P-1) was registered wherein her husband Veer Parkash and father-in-law Pargat Singh were tried. The complainant had not supported the prosecution case and both of them were acquitted by the trial Court vide its judgment dated 20th April, 2011 (Annexure P-4). Petitioner No.1-Jyoti is mother-in-law (mother of Veer Parkash) and petitioner No.2-Prem Parkash is Dewar (younger brother of Veer Parkash) of the deceased Ranjit Kaur. Criminal Misc. No. M-17054 of 2011 (O&M) In the present petition, it has been prayed that the impugned FIR (Annexure P-1) be quashed on the basis of judgment (Annexure P-4) rendered by the trial Court, especially when the complainant has not supported the case of prosecution. After hearing counsel for the petitioners, this Court is of the view that no case is made out to quash the impugned FIR (Annexure P-1) as separate evidence is to be led against the accused, who were declared as proclaimed offenders. However, in case the petitioners appear before the trial Court, their application for regular bail shall be decided on the same day by the trial Court taking into consideration the judgment (Annexure P-4). With the observations made above, present petition is disposed of. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE June 2, 2011 rps 2