1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA C.W.P. No. 1300/2002 Date of decision: 24.2.2009 Devki …Petitioner Vs. Union of India and anr …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr.Justice R.B.Misra,J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: None For the respondent : Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India. Per Surjit Singh, J.(Oral) Notice of actual date of hearing was sent to the petitioner. Despite that she is not present. We have perused the record particularly the order of the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, judicial review of which has been sought. 2. Petitioner filed an Original application before the Central Administrative Tribunal, seeking grant of family pension on the basis of service rendered by one late Devi Ram, as Khalasi, in a department of Central Government, claiming that she was one of the two widows of said Devi Ram. Said Devi Ram died in the year 1964. After his death, family pension was granted to a widow of Devi Ram. That widow died in the year 1988. Till her death, petitioner had not made any claim that she was also widow of Devi Ram and entitled to share the family pension with the other widow. Learned Tribunal 1 Whether reporter of local papers are allowed to see the judgment ? 2 dismissed the OA filed by the petitioner holding that it was hopelessly time barred and also there was nothing on the record showing that the petitioner was a wife of deceased Devi Ram and that her marriage with Devi Ram had taken place prior to the coming into force of Hindi Marriage Act, the parties being Hindu. 3. We find no illegality in the order of the learned Tribunal. Hence there is no scope for judicial review. The petition, is, therefore, dismissed. ( R.B. Misra ), J. ( Surjit Singh ), J. 24th February, 2009(sl)