& aMBasBSBBBsaa&aaia HIGH COVRT 0V CHHAimSQAKH AT BIL^PBR W.P.(S| N0. 7718/2007 PETITIONBR Versus 2. 3. 4. Heintol Sabu, S/o. Aguuram Sahu, aged about 57 years. R/o. Village Bhendri, Post Ofifce, Lobarai, Tehsfl Rajim (Panduka) District Raipur (CG) Sfate of Cbhattisgarh, Through the Secretaiy, Water Resources Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur Distnct Raipur (CG) Engineer-iu-CIuef, Water Resources Department, District Raipiu- (CG) Ctuef Engmeer, Mahaxiadi Godavan Kachchar, Water Resources Department, District Raipitr (CG) Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Division Gariyaband, District Raipitr (CO) Sub Divisionat OfiBcer, Pairi Can.al, Water Resoiirces Departinent, Sub Division No.2, Paaduka, District Raipur (CG) V- WRIT PBTITIOW UMTDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHS_CONSnTy|[IOW 18B^Hon'bleMr._Sat|sh^K.^Agsihotarl,J.l Sbri Mohaimned Asif, couasel for the petitioner. Shri U.N.S. Deo, Govenuuent Advocate for fhe State. ORAL OKDBR (Passed on thls 3"" day of January 2008) Leamed coiuisel appearing for the petitioner submits fbat the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merit. However, the petitioner be granted permission to inake a detailed represeutation to respondent No.2 raising aU lus grievances in regard to regi.tlarization. 2. Learaed counsel appeanng for fhe State has no objection. 3. Without expressiug any opimon, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation, il' so advised, to fhe respondent No.2 aad the respondent No.2 shall consider fhe same in accoidaace with law withia a period of two monfhs fixim the date of receipt of the representation. No order as to costs. 4. The petition is accordiagly, disposed of. usa Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge