IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.1005 of 2008 Date of Decision.03.10.2011 Natha Singh son of Chagger Singh son of Sher Singh, r/o village Bambiha, Tehsil and Distt. Bathinda .....Petitioner Versus Sukhdev Singh son of Ajmer Singh r/o village Bambiha, Tehsil and District Bathinda .....Respondent Present: None. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The above civil revision is against an interim order passed on 17.01.2008 in a suit for recovery of money due on a promissory note. In terms of the interim order, the plaintiff had been permitted to examine the handwriting and finger prints expert at his own cost. There is simply no scope for such like matters where a discretion is available for a trial Judge to allow for examination of witnesses, whose evidence is relevant for the case. 2. There is no merit in the civil revision and it is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE October 03, 2011 Pankaj*