my“ Mmmmax w$¢ wmm («mmwwMammham, mm..#mmu$mu wwmxhwwmmmbmx wwwwyup/wwmm Nam.“ \ mum$wmm3mmm C,\_“mwmnwm_u mmwmmwwmmnmmw maammmnaw” maawmmr03mmw mammdwmm“ mwam: wwwww mag. ”magnum mmwmmwmwwmmgw qmumwwmw m3 mwawuammmmw mmmwuw mmzmammmww. w‘mmmwm $.xuw‘wmmw? mammawmmmm awmmwwmmmmrmmmmn mammmm“ hmwwmwmmmm“ mmmmmmw mnamgwwmm%m§£m% mammq wmvm§mww 0mmEwmwwmmy? mammmmw“ mwwmmmmwmww mmwmnwmm. mmnrwwmwm mwmwEmmmuw. / Mutgm wsmqunmmnm mmamnmmqmmm~ , mummuamwwmwgwmmmww ulkm wQégbk wNEmEX awiwgiywx 1m mamqwmwm wmmNmMw mm «mm Qhqb Qua wagmmz am E?» $81 G’? i QGGS Shri P. Diwakar, counsd f! Slui Vinod DEshmukh, cm Thig Writ psti‘iion is i'ihad againsf th€ O'i‘dm‘ (Mtéd 08,!05,’ 2001 passed by ma Cam ,of Gratuity Act, 1972 (for short, tha order on maits, th6 virw of of S€ctio11 7 Gf Ills Said Acx is ai: When this amir 1'S callt‘d ths pelitimmr that in View of th Chailcmgc this grougd as Vircs, at: 11c Sublnit$ mat sillcc. an altcz‘na‘ at that poiilt of time, ”the Apyelk had apgnvachcd this Court by WE as in The meanijme, the AppeEatE in viaw of tiae Gbjecfiog raised “ i0 eaable the p-stitigugr thE AppEEata ximfhox’ “ppl‘aach 3r Lhe EleLitiDner. ‘111361 for thf mgpolzc’mxm rolling Au’fhf;1*ity 111K181" Paymmri “thE Acf’). meand pmviaa to sub-section {7) ,0 Ci1alia11g€d,. it iS fairiy maxed by ceunsai for p s ii stzmciS c0nclud€¢ Hgwcvcr, ivr: rcmcdy waS not aveu‘lahic ch Lia Auihoxity was not notifiacL 116 - Ly of thiS writ petitian. HOW/@7613 Aufhoritv ha's beeuasi‘ified anci he wouic‘i $66k pezmgsion t0 withdraw ihig petiiimx in orde: its/Z As; §m§i€€L Ezeviisgign Ayqrt fmm assaumg ssttkd positicn, he. weuid not [W'iéém XI-HC-ZZ am m . .....................................v1 200 Wm Wm mm‘ftfé'am 611%“ W93? § ‘36 $ 31Wm WEE? grantad. ‘kccofdingly, thls‘ Wi‘itlpafi‘iion staucis c1 0f ws withdrawn C H i“, howeva‘, $Llbm2tiad by the learnad couiisel fer file ps‘ti‘tionér” that, as ”(he h'mih‘riml for apgxaal is 60 (iays, it haS dirsction be igSuEii So that the €Xpir€d and, ihem‘ibre, somf: may yam-3161‘ is not yrejudicsd. Havmg c011$id€rad flnn mattm‘, it i$ dirac‘md tha‘i in casE suitabki application 1‘01" coniilmlation 0f dalay is; mad€, ‘th€. sauna ha considErad th€ Amhem‘ty sympamrsiically taking mic may by considm‘ation L116 fact that at that r616vem: H1116 i316 Esp'pisiiak Authoritv had not bean 11(Jti1’icd far which ‘thc pttitivmti“ hail appyoachcd thi$ Court 13v we v of thi§ writ gzciiiiiml. , 111 View of ’ 13 abova, MEAL? No.833} 2&G3, I.A.Nos.5177f2002 and 354-43f2003‘6gic1:&'§3:)83c1 OE/ Sd/- i Sdl- Lu g I ‘ P.C-Naik f l Fakhruddin \ V Judge Judge r X l [u°r%W