1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.1890 OF 1995 Madan Modak. ..Plaintiff. V/s. Syndicate Bank. ..Defendant. Mr.R.V.Vasekar i/b. Utangale & Co. for plaintiff. Mr.V.A.Almeida a/w. Mr.Ansari Maqsood i/b. M.C.Jain for defednant. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : JULY 19, 2007. DATE : JULY 19, 2007. DATE : JULY 19, 2007. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Advocate for the plaintiff states that no instructions are forthcoming from the plaintiff, for which reason neither the affidavit of evidence nor the original documents can be presented to the Court. Obviously, the plaintiff is not interested in pursuing the present proceeding, as inspite of intimation sent to the plaintiff by the advocate as back as in March, 2007, the plaintiff has not bothered to contact his advocate. The matter has been adjourned on more than one occasion since 21st March, 2007. The suit pertains to year 1995. In the circumstances, suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. 2 (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)