1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. APPEAL AGAINST ORDER NO.133 OF 2010 Abhimanyu s/o Baktamal Chawla Vs. Bilquish Jehan Begum w/o Q.S. Nisar Ali and others ........................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................... Shri H.R.Gadhiya, Counsel for the Applicant. Shri R.D.Bhuibhar, Counsel for the R-1 to 6. Shri P.P.Kotwal, Counsel for the R-7. Shri Rohit Deo, Counsel for the R-8. CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 21. JUNE, 2011. This appeal challenges the order dated 30.6.2010 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur, rejecting the application Exh.5 filed by the applicant for grant of injunction, restraining the defendants from making any further construction and transferring, developing, creating any third party interest, and carrying out any construction over the suit property. Shri Rohit Deo, the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent no.8, has made a statement that the entire construction is over, the .....2/- 2 Apartments are handed over to the concerned persons and they are in occupation and possession of the same either by virtue of the sale deed or an agreement to sale. He submits that all the formalities are completed in respect of the Apartment. In view of above, the injunction application has become infructuous. So far as the challenge to the impugned order is concerned, any subsequent transfer pending the decision of the suit would be hit by lis-pendence. Hence, no interference is called for. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE BrWankhede ...../-