IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 1339 of 2008 Date of Decision : January 29, 2008 Manohar Lal Rohilla ....Petitioner Versus Estate Officer, HUDA, Gurgaon and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN Present : Mr. M.L. Rohilla-Petitioner-in-person. M.M. KUMAR, J. It is the conceded position that the matter is pending before respondent No. 2. After issuance of directions on 7.11.2007 by him to respondent No.1 to furnish the requisite information by 25.11.2007. On 11.12.2007, respondent No.2 has extended the period for supply of information by 10 days. The State Information Commission, i.e. respondent No.2, is seized of the matter and the petitioner has unnecessarily rushed to this Court by filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. In view of the above, the writ petition cannot be maintained and the same is dismissed. At this stage, M.L. Rohilla-petitioner-in-person requests for withdrawal of the petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. ( M.M. KUMAR ) JUDGE ( T.P.S. MANN ) JANUARY 29, 2008 JUDGE satish