IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8586 of 2011 AJIT YADAV, S/o Mathura Yadav. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 25.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 447, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner has caused injury at the informant on account of which he remained in the hospital for eighteen days, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case shall not be bifurcated for commitment of framing the charge and if it is done the petitioner’s bail will not be considered by this Court. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)