IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.20063 of 2011 Date of Decision : December 19, 2011. Umesh Kumar .....Petitioner versus Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Vikas Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner appeared in the B.Ed. Examination held by the respondent-University in June, 2008, but his result has not been declared so far. It is averred that the claim of the petitioner is squarely covered by a decision of this Court dated 1.2.2011 rendered in a bunch of writ petitions including CWP No.9532 of 2009 (Reena Chauhan versus Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra and others (Annexure P-3). The writ petition is disposed of accordingly with a direction to respondent Nos.1 & 2 to consider the claim of the petitioner regarding declaration of his result of B.Ed. Examination in the light of the decision of CWP No.20063 of 2011 [2] this Court in Reena Chauhan's case (supra) and pass an appropriate speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. December 19, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE