HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA C.M.A.NO.1418 OF 2001 Dt.20.4.2010 Between: Mulaparthi Santhakumari .. Appellant And Mulaparthi Mohanarao .. Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA C.M.A.NO.1418 OF 2001 JUDGMENT: (Per Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) Both the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties submit that both the parties are not responding to their letters addressed by them. It was represented on 24.7.2009 that the parties have settled the matter and for obtaining instructions it was adjourned to 10.8.2009. Thereafter, it is stated that neither of the parties have given any instructions to their respective counsel. On 28.1.2010 it was represented that the parties are living together and the same has to be recorded, but none of the counsel are able to obtain written instructions. Again on 11.3.2010, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the wife and husband are living together and accordingly he sought time for filing compromise petition or written instructions. But, none of the counsel are able to obtain any written instructions. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that the information received by both the counsel may be true and correct and therefore they are not responding to the letters addressed by their counsel. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant wife has specifically stated that in fact the advocate, who appeared for the wife in the court below, informed him that both the parties are living together. In the light of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, as both the parties appear to have been living together, the C.M.A. is allowed and the order under appeal is set aside. No order as to costs. _______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. _______________ B.N.RAO NALLA, J. 20.4.2010 kpr