312mm .THE HIGH covm CF gHHATTIsGARH ég_BILg-$spm. WRIT PETL ION NGUéA OF 04(3B)./ w-..~.——...-—.—M—m__um Rajendra; Rae Piawar, ageni 35 years, S/O» $hri {LR‘ Pawar R/o¢ Kadam Bwa (C/o, E‘hyam Rae K adam) , Bandhwapara, Sarkanda, 19.0.? £5 Distt. Bilaspur (Chh&ttisgarh) ,, Rajesh Kumar Manikpuri, aged .shri BeD. Manikguri, c/o‘ aoshni Kirana $tore, Diprapara (Tikraparah Behind 3.13. Vigra College, ERG. and Eistté Bilaspur (C.G.) 4O years, S/o. lax-(Emmi Kumar Verma, aged 4O ye&rs, 3/0, 3hri (3.8a Verma, R/o* 2'7 Khali, Vikas Nagar, Kududand, P‘O¢ 5c Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) . Vinod Rao Mara-tha, agéd 38 years, s/o. Shri Trimbak Rao, R/o. chantiaih ( Near School) 1n front of Agarwal Lakdital, chantidih, PaO‘ and Distt. Bi l aspur , (Chh atti sg arh) . 5) Kaleshwar Prasaa‘ Tamboli, agea about 38 years, s/o. Shri L‘P‘ Tamboli, Village & P.O* Gatora via Jairamnagar, Tahsil Masturi, Di stt . Bi l aspur (Chhatti 5g arh) . 6) sheshnarayan Thawait, aged years, $/o., $hri C3” Thawait Near Mannu Chowk, Gupta Gali’ Tikra Par&y §¢O¢ & DiStt‘ ’ Bilaspur , (Chhattisgarh) . contén.2.... //2// REsggNDE NT u sate of Chhattisgarh’ t thro ugh secret ary. General Admini stration Department, Mantralay, D.K..S. Bhawan, Raipur; (Chhattisgarh) . gggITIgN UNQER ARTICLE 2&6? 227:? THE coNSTIgfgTION OF INDIA FoR E3SUANCE OF A WRIT mmmmus Aim ANY QTHER :vv’RIT/mmc'rION/oRDER‘ ‘ ‘ Jul ”r E HIGH COURT GF JUDICATURE EHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish K, Agnihotri? J. W. l’. Na. 764 of 2004 Patiu'cmsrs : Rajendra R210 Pawar And Others, Versus Respondant State of Chhattisgarh. Shri BR! Ghosh, counsgl with Smt. Meera Jaiswal, counsal for the yetitionerS. Shn‘ Awind Dubay, Panel lawyer for the State] respondent. QRAL Qgegg glow July, 2006) 1. The petitioners wem appointed on contract basis for census operation 1'11 April, 1991. After the census operation was over, the petitioners became job less, LO State} respondent be directed to appoint the petitioners on the post of Lower Division Clerk or any equivalent post. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondent submits that the State Government has already taken a policy decision and by Older dated 12.9.2003 {Annexure P— 1) all the State Collectors, Head of the Departmentghave been directed to appoint surplus employees of census operations again st me vacant posts on priority basis. 3. In View of the above stated facts, the State Government is / directed to consider cases of the petitioners as per memo The petitioners have filed this petition, praying that the dated 12.92003 (Annexure P-l) as axpeditiously as possiblc. With the abome mentioned direction, tire. petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sdl— K Agnihom smish Judge