(VA: @ C’V/pfd" IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ ?etition No. 370’ /2oo3 / Bihari Lal Thawait, Aged about 32 years S/o Late Gajadhar Prasg?*l‘fiawait R/o. Village Kotmi Sonar, f P.O. Koti Sonar, Tahsil Janjg‘r / m Distt. Janjgi-Cha (C.G.) ramp ” :. he State of Chhattigarh Through, Secretary .x inistry of Hom Affairs M e Raipur (C.G.) Inspector General of Police i Blaspur Zone, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Superintendent o Police District Janjgir-Chama (C.G Station House Officer Police Statio Akara, x Distt. Janjgir—Champa (C..) G '. R sh Keyvat, d L /o. Villae Kotmi Sonar, P.O. Kotmi Sonar, Tahsil Janjg‘r Distt. Janjgr—Champa (C.G.) n am e age about42'years ”7/ S/o. Shri axman Kenwat R g i @ PETITIONER; b R VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1 T s f p .) n alt //2// Rahim Khan, Aged about45 years S/O. Shri late Mahbub Khan R/o. Village Kotmi Sonar, P.O. Kotmi Sonar, Tahsil anjg‘r Distt. Janjgir—Champa (C.'.) . £’ v WRIT PETITION U/A zgs/mm OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ;xm-M y w J G In , a @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BI‘LASPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3701 OF 2003 PETITI’ONER Bihari Lal Thawait Versus The State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. ‘ Present :- Shri Ashok Swarnakar, Advocate for the petitioner. RESPONDENTs A Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri P.K. Tuisyan, Advocate for respondents No.§ & 6. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 6m day of July, 201 0) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that despite repeated communications to the petitioner, he has not received any instruction, thus learned counset pleads no instructions. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. . 1) l Sd/u .. v I l Satish K.Agnihotri {u Judge v i” "T , ; / I