IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1677 of 2006 1. BALDEO MAHTO and 2. Janak Mahto, both sons of Late Narayan Mahto, residents of Village – Bara, P.S. Mofassil, Distt. – Gaya………………………..Defendants – Petitioners. Versus Smt. SONA DEVI, Wife of Bishundeo Prasad (Daughter of Late Brahamdeo Mahto), at present resident of Village – Bara, P.S. Moffasil, Distt. Gaya……………. Plaintiff – Opposite Party. ----------- For the petitioners:- Mr. Ram Kumar Sharma, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Ramashish, Advocate. For the Opposite Party:- Mr. Dhrub Narayan, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Abhishek, Advocate. --------- 2. 19.02.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party. After some argument learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdrawn this Civil Revision application. Permission is accorded. This Civil Revision is dismissed as withdrawn. However, learned counsel for the defendants – petitioners seeks liberty to file a petition before the court below for proper amendment of the written statement or to file an additional written statement, which has become necessary due to amendment of the plaint as allowed by the - 2 - impugned order. Learned counsel for the plaintiff – opposite party does not raise any objection to that. Liberty, as sought, is granted. If such amendment petition or additional written statement is filed by the defendants – petitioners, the court below shall take a decision in accordance with law. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )