IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. W.J.C. No.40 of 2011 BIGGU SINGH, son of Dukhu Singh, resident of Village Saraiya, P.S. Bhagwanpur, District Kaimur ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 2. Deputy Inspector General, Sahabad Range, Bihar. 3. Superintendent of Police, Kaimur. 4. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kaimur. 5. Officer In Charge, Bhagwanpur P.S., District Kaimur. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 31.3.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The prayer of the petitioner is that Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No.90 of 2010 registered against him for the offences under sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 471/34 of the Penal Code be supervised by the Superintendent of Police, Kaimur (respondent no.3). The further prayer of the petitioner is that the investigating officer of the case should investigate the case by making necessary inquiry from the Office of the concerned District Transport Officer with respect to the matter as to who was the original owner of the motorcycle in question and whether it was transferred in favour of the petitioner or not. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that all the three submissions of the petitioner are subject-matter of investigation. Considering the submissions of the parties, it goes without saying that the investigation of the aforesaid police case be - 2 - completed expeditiously without unnecessary delay in accordance with law. The investigating officer exercising his statutory power while investigating the case under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure is entitled to make the necessary investigation from wherever the material with respect to the alleged offence could be revealed. While investigation is done, the higher police officers, including the Superintendent of Police, may supervise the case whenever it is required as per the law. With the above observations/directions, the writ application stands disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)