IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1819 of 2010 ARBIND KUMAR THAKUR & ORS. Versus MOST. ARTI DEVI & ORS. ----------- For the petitioners : Mrs. Sushmita Mishra, Advcate 3 05.01.2011 Heard Mrs. Sushmita Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners. This application has been filed for restoration of Civil Revision No. 925 of 2007 which stood dismissed for part non compliance of order dated 22.12.2009. It is submitted that due to mistake and confusion on the part of the office of the learned counsel, the requisites were filed in C.R. No. 1071/2007 but could not be filed in C.R. No. 925 of 2007 within the preemptory period though C.R. No. 925 of 2007 was heard along with C.R. No. 1071 of 2007 and vide common order dated 22.12.2009 the petitioners were directed to file requisites for notices to opposite parties within two weeks after Xmas holidays. On being satisfied with the sufficiency of reasons mentioned in this application for omission on part of the office of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Civil Revision No. 925/2007 is restored 2 to its original file and number subject to the condition that the order dated 22.12.2009 is fully complied within two weeks in one of the aforesaid civil revisions i.e. C.R. No. 925/2007 if already not complied with. Accordingly, this application stands allowed. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)