1 116.doc ttm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CVIL APPLICATION NO.116 OF 2011 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.97 OF 2010 Gaurang Vinod Doshi .. Applicant Vs. Madhurai Gaurang Doshi .. Respondent Mr.S.S.Gandhi and Mr.Devendra Udani i/b Mr.Rishi Bhuta for the applicant Mr.Satish Mane-Shinde i/b Ms.Loshina Bulchandani for the respondent CORAM: K.K.TATED & U.D.SALVI, JJ. VACATION COURT DATE: 20th MAY, 2011 PC: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. This Civil Application is preferred by the husband for extension of time to return to India as per order dated 21.1.11 passed by Division Bench of this court (V.C.Daga & R.G.Ketkar, JJ) in Civil Application No.338 of 2010. The 2 116.doc learned counsel for the respondent filed their affidavit in reply and vehemently opposed the present application. 3. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant s project is going on in U.K. and it will take ’ some time to complete the same. To make appropriate arrangement, he requires some time. 4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and the averments made in Civil Application, time to return to India granted as per order dated 21st January, 2011 is extended till 30.6.11. It is made clear that no further extension shall be granted. 5. The learned counsel for the applicant undertakes to pay and/or to deposit with this court the maintenance charges payable to the respondent on due dates. 6. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. (U.D.SALVI, J.) (K.K.TATED,J.)