IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3833 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision : 16.12.2009 Arjinder Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.S.P.Soi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.G.S.Attariwala, Addl.AG. Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 3.5.2008 passed by the Additional District Judge, Jalandhar, whereby the execution application moved by the petitioner-decree-holder in an arbitration award, has been dismissed, being fully satisfied, on an erroneous presumption as if the petitioner has admitted the receipt of entire payment. The petitioner's categorical case is that the amount, as awarded by the Arbitrator, has not been so far fully paid. C.R. No.3833 of 2008 (O&M) 2 In this view of the matter, the revision petition is allowed; the impugned order dated 3.5.2008 is set-aside and the learned Additional District Judge, Jalandhar, is directed to re-examine the petitioner's claim as to whether or not he has been paid the entire amount as per the arbitral award dated 30.10.1998. Dasti. 16-12-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE