IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37142 of 2010 1. MEENA DEVI 2. RAMPADARATH THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 03. 29.11.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that considering the merit of the case petitioners were allowed anticipatory bail by the learned Sessions Judge, but they could not surrender within stipulated period given by the Sessions Judge. Prayer was made to extend the period for surrender that is refused amounts to refusal of anticipatory bail and for non-appearance in time, it is said that petitioner no.2 is working in Delhi where his wife Meena Devi also resides. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of a receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, 2 Samastipur in connection with Complaint Case No.607/2006 corresponding to Tr. No.2939/2006, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)