IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC (T) No. 42/2008 Decided on:31.3.2011 _____________________________________________ Bidhi Singh. …Petitioner. Versus Daljit Dogra and another. …Respondent. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. S.R. Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. B.N. Misra, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. _____________________________________________________ Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the case of the petitioner for compassionate appointment shall be considered, strictly as per the seniority, in the category to which he belongs. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for compassionate appointment according to the seniority. It is made clear that in the eventuality of the case 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 of petitioner being considered, bar of age will not come in his way. Needful be done within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 31.3.2011 *awasthi*