IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22991 of 2011 Natta Mian @ Nattar Mian, S/o Sekh Subhari Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 28.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that for misuse of privilege of bail for about seven years, the petitioner is in custody since 11.3.2011 and in the intervening period he has not committed any illegal act, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-I, Supaul, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 22 of 2004 arising out of Chhatapur P.S. Case No. 41 of 2000 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the wife of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be 2 cancelled. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it positively within a period of nine months so that there is no further delay which would give rise to a complication of similar nature. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)