Civil Revision No. 1912 of 2009 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1912 of 2009 Date of Decision: 16.7.2009 Surinder Singh and another ......Petitioners Versus Mohan Singh .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Vineet Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral). Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the learned trial Court on 4.3.2009, whereby an application filed by the petitioner-defendants in the suit, to reject the plaint as barred by limitation, was declined. The plaintiff has filed a suit for declaration that he is owner in possession of the suit property and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering in his peaceful possession. The petitioner has sought rejection of plaint as barred by limitation in terms of the provisions of Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The learned trial Court has held that since the plaintiff has sought relief of permanent injunction with the averments that the cause of Civil Revision No. 1912 of 2009 (2) action arose few days before the filing of the suit, therefore, the suit of the plaintiff cannot be said to be beyond limitation. In view of the finding recorded, I do not find any patent illegality or material irregularity in the impugned order, which may warrant interference by this Court, in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 16-07-2009 ds