HIQH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR CONTEiVIPt CASE (C) N0.21S of 2009 ../ PETITIGNER RESPONDENTS 1 Gend Kumar Gupta, S/o Shri R.R. Gupta, Aged about 58 years, R/o Krishna Nagar, Juna Bllaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Versiis Mudit Kumar Singh, Managing Director, Chhattisgarh Adhosanrachana Vikas Nigam, Parivahan Prabhag, RaJpur(CG) Hemial Banjare, The Divssionai Manager, Chhattisgarh Adhosanrachana Vikas Nigam, Bus Stand, Biiaspur (CG) PETJTION'UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEIVIPT OF. COURTACT Appearance: Mr. S.P. Kate, Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Counsef for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (09.02.2010) SUNiLKUMARSINHA.J. Heard. Petitioner- Gend Kumar Gupta has fiied this petition for initiation of proceedings of contempt against the respondents for the alleged disobedience of the order dated 19th of March 2009 passed by this Court in W.P. No.218172003. This Court while disposing ofthe aforesaid writ petition on 19ih ofMarch 2009 passed the following order: "8. in view of the foregoing, it is apparent . that the outstanding dues, as prayed in the petition, have been settled in view of the appiication i.e. t.A. No.Sfiled on 15.9.2008, which remains unrebutted CONTEMPT CASE fC) N0.216 of 2009 by the petltioner. However, if it is found by the petitioner that stilt something remains to be paid, though the petitioner has already given an undertaking that full and final payment has been made, the petitioner may make appropriate representation fo the competent authority. If the representation is made, the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law, on its own merits." Mr. S.P.Kale, learned counsei appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that after passing of the aforssaid order, the petitioner made a representation on 25.04.2009. He submits that since the representation was not dedded,the petitioner had to fite this petltion for initiation of proceedings of contempt. Reply to the petition has been filed on behalf of the respondents. it has been contended by Nr.Ashish Shrivastava, tearned counse! appearing on behalf of the respondents/that the representation has already been disposed of vide order dated 24.08.2009 (Annexure R-1) and the petitioner has been paid a sum of Rs. 13,5427- On a perusal of the aforesaid document, there appears to be substantial compliance of the order passed by this Court. in view of the above, I am not inclined to proceed further in the matter. The petition deserves to be and is accordingly dismissed at thisstage. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge