IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2006 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1928 Con.Case(C).No. 1367 OF 2006(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.4391/2005 .................... PETITIONER: ---------------------------- M.G. AMBILI, D/O.LATE MADHAVAN NAIR, RESIDING AT PUTHEN VEEDU, IRUMPANANGADU, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. E. RAJENDRAN NAIR, S/O.E. ESWARA PILLAI AGED 53 YEARS, MANAGER, AS.E.P.M. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, IRUMPANANGADU, KOLLAM. 2. SMT.K.K. SHYAMALA, AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOLLAM. 3. SRI.D. RAVEENDRAN, AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOTTARAKKARA. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/11/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMAN, J. ============= CONT. CASE (C) 1367/2006 ===================== DATED THIS, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2006. J U D G M E N T The contempt alleged is violation of the judgment in W.P.(C) 391/2005. It is submitted that a writ appeal therefrom has already been preferred. But neither side is able to tell the number. However, the parties are at ad idem that such a writ appeal is preferred and judgment is reserved. This contempt case for the time being is closed with leave and liberty to the petitioner to move afresh in case a necessity arises pursuant to the writ appeal judgment. P.R. RAMAN, (JUDGE) knc/-