1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. C.A. NO. 7627/08 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 14701/08. Dattatraya Kharole .vs. Madhukar S. Raipure ________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders. Registrars orders. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATED : MARCH 12, 2009. Heard Mr. Shinde, learned Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Chandurkar, learned Advocate for respondent. Mr. Shinde, learned Advocate for the applicant, submits that the delay caused in filing of the appeal is because of the ailment suffered by the applicant. The details of the ailment and the treatment are given in the application at para 4. Reply is filed to the application. Mr. Chandurkar, learned Advocate for respondent, vehemently opposed the application for condonation of delay. As it is revealed from the medical certificates that the applicant was taking medical treatment for various ailments and as such, in my opinion, it will be appropriate to condone the delay in the interest of justice, subject to payment of costs of Rs.5000/- within a period of four weeks. The application stands allowed. JUDGE. J.