((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION JUDGE’S ORDER NO.148 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.736 OF 2006 HDFC Limited Plaintiffs versus Maurya Suryakant Shivnaryan Defendant Mr.D.S.Purandare i/by Negandhi, Shah & Himayatullah for plaintiffs. Mr.A.Y.Malekar, representative of Court Receiver CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 2nd May 2006 PC : 1. After this Judge’s Order was signed, noticing that defendant and his advocate despite receipt of notice from the plaintiffs’ advocate has not remained present, in all fairness Shri Purandare states that the plaintiff will not act upon this order till 9th May 2006, to enable the defendant to be served once again. Similarly, the plaintiff would intimate to the defendant that it would be open for him to execute an agency agreement with the Court Receiver on usual terms, ((-2-)) if he so desires. 2. Application stands disposed of accordingly. All concerned including Court Receiver to act on an ordinary copy of this order duly authenticated by the Registry. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)