IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2008 / 28TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 18329 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ ALTHAF ISMAIL, PROPRIETOR, FAVOUR ITA-INTERNATIONAL, CONSUMER NO.5560001431, XI/408,409, CHERIYAKADAVU, KANNAMALY P.O., KOCHI. PIN - 682008. BY ADV. SRI.BLAZE K.JOSE RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHUTHI BHAVAN, PATTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 2. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, KERRALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, KANNAMALY, KOCHI. 3. CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM (CGRF), POWER HOUSE ROAD, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN 18. BY SC ADV. SRI. P.P. THAJUDEEN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No. 18329 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 18th day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner seeks a direction to the third respondent to consider Ext.P7. He also seeks a direction to the second respondent to keep in abeyance Exts.P5 and P6. 2. I heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. Counsel for the respondents is unable to establish that the petitioner is not entitled to the same treatment as given in Ext.P8 judgment. Petitioner has also preferred Ext.P7 before the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum. In such circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of as follows: There will be a direction to the third respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P7 in accordance with law within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. While it is permissible for respondents 1 and 2 to raise the bills under LT-VII A, the petitioner will be permitted to remit charges under LT-IV tariff for a period of two months. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb