-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3930 of 2010 Smt. Bhonri Devi daughter of late Shri Moti Das VERSUS Additional District & Sessions Judge No.6, Jaipur City, Jaipur and Others Date of Order :::: March 22nd, 2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Mr.Vijay Kumar Sharma, Counsel for the Petitioner *** By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, perused the impugned order as well as the document, Annexure-4, which was sought to be summoned. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, the suit has been filed by the plaintiff alleging that the plaintiff has undivided share in the property in dispute, which has been sold by the defendant Nos.1 to 5 in favour of the defendant Nos.10 and 11 and thereafter defendant No.10 has sold her share also to the defendant No.11. Needless to say that for the plaintiff to succeed in the suit the plaintiff must prove her case that she has undivided share in the property. So far as the document, Annexure-4, which was -2- sought to be summoned at the instance of the plaintiff is concerned, prima-facie it has no relevance with the case of the plaintiff. If at all even as per the case of the plaintiff the same may have some relevancy, so far as Issue No.11 is concerned and the burden for which, has been fixed on the defendant No.11. In the facts and circumstances, I find no jurisdictional error in the impugned order. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed summarily. (Dalip Singh), J. Ashok/