IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 1643 of 2007 Date of decision: 7th August, 2009 Davinder Kaur … Petitioner Versus Gurmukh Singh and others … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Amardeep Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Amita Singla, Advocate for Mr. Harsh Bhunger, Advocate for the respondent. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) In the present case, at the instance of Davinder Kaur, a Kalandra under Section 145 Cr.P.C. was filed. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Jalandhar-I, vide order (Annexure P-2) ordered appointment of Receiver. This order was assailed in the revision. The revisional Court accepted the revision, holding that there is no apprehension of breach of peace and it further ordered that proceedings under Section 145 Cr.P.C. be dropped. Against this order, Davinder Kaur has approached this Court. Petitioner has placed reliance upon Annexure P-3 to state that the suit for permanent injunction was filed by Gurmukh Singh respondent No.1 against the petitioner. It is further stated that vide Annexure P-4, Davinder Kaur petitioner had filed a written statement to the suit. This Court on 12th September, 2008 directed the Civil Court to explore the feasibility of deciding the civil suit within a period of six months. Criminal Revision No. 1643 of 2007 On February 17, 2009, on a communication received from the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Jalandhar extension of one year was granted to conclude the proceedings. As per the averments made in the present petition, Civil Court is already seized of the matter. It is well settled that in proceedings under Section 145 Cr.P.C., only possession is to be determined and the title of the parties is not to be gone into. In view of this, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Jalandhar-I shall await the outcome of the civil suit and thereafter, shall decide the proceedings within two months, in accordance with provisions of law. In case civil suit is not pending, then he will immediately proceed with the proceedings pending before him and the same shall be decided within two months, in accordance with provisions of law. Till then, possession, as it exists today, shall be maintained by the parties. With these observations, present petition is disposed off. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE August 7, 2009 rps 2