IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26725 of 1995 Between: 1 T.Janaradan Reddy S/o T.Somasekar Reddy R/o 7/86, Jayanagar Colony, Cuddapah 2 P. Dhanunjaya Reddy S/o. Narayana Reddy R/o. 7/86, Jayanagar Colony, Cuddapah. 3 G. Sreenivasa Rao S/o. G. Ganga Rao R/o. 28-130 1st Floor, B-Cross, Ramnagar Colony. Chittoor. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Andhra Pradesh Health and Medical Housing and Infrastructure Development Corporation, rep by its Managing Director, Pioneer House, 5th House, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. 2 The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Secretary, Medical, Health and family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3 The Executive Engineer, The A.P. Health and Medical Housing and Infrastructure Development Corporation, 7/86, Jayanagar Colony, Cuddapah. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not regularizing the services of the petitioners on the ground that they have not completed 5 years of service as on 25-11-1993 as stipulated in G.O.Ms.No. 212, dated 22-4- 1994as illegal and arbitrary and consequentially direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners by giving relaxation to the condition of completion of 5 Years of service as on 25-11-1993 and as per the recommendation of the 1st respondent vide Letter No. APHMHIDC/F.63/Vol.VI/94-95, dated 28-3-1995 in their respective posts with all consequential benefits etc., and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: NONE APPEARED Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 3: SMT.A.P.LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent No.2: G.P. FOR MEDICAL & HEALTH The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue a Writ or Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not regularizing the services of the petitioners on the ground that they have not completed 5 years of service as on 25-11-1993 as stipulated in G.O.Ms.No. 212, dated 22-4-1994 as illegal and arbitrary and consequentially direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners by giving relaxation to the condition of completion of 5 Years of service as on 25-11-1993 and as per the recommendation of the 1st respondent vide Letter No. APHMHIDC/F.63/Vol.VI/94-95, dated 28-3-1995 in their respective posts with all consequential benefits etc., and to pass such other order or orders” At the hearing, there has been no representation for the petitioners both in the Forenoon and Afternoon Sessions. It is, therefore, reasonable to presume that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing their cause in the writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in default. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 26.12.2008 va