IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.517 of 2010 ROHIT SINGH @ ROHIT KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 12.4.2010 This revision application has been preferred against the order dated 16.3.2010 passed by Sessions Judge, Begusarai in Criminal Appeal No. 10 of 2010, by which he dismissed the appeal and confirmed the order dated 10.11.2009 passed by Principal Member, Juvenile Justice Board, Begusarai in Naokothi P.S. Case No. 76/2008 in Naokothi P.S. Case No. 76 of 2008 whereby prayer for releasing the petitioner on bail has been refused. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Considering the facts that dispute in between the parties was negotiation of sale and purchase of informant’s old house for which consideration money was also paid. Petitioner’s father having similar allegation has been allowed bail by this Court vide Cr.Misc.No. 20255 of 2009 without help of section 12 of Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000. So, no question arises to refuse bail to the petitioner when he is privileged with section 12 of the Act which has not been 2 considered by both the courts below. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Begusarai in Naokothi P.S. Case No. 76 of 2008. It is made clear that one of the bailers shall be close relation other than co-accused persons of this case, who shall undertake to keep the petitioner under his observation and shall produce him whenever is ordered by the Juvenile Justice Board. The judgments and orders of both the courts below are set aside. Let this order be communicated to the aforesaid court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)