IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 8th day of December 2009 Ist Bail Application No.1194 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Ravi Kumar ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: December 8, 2009 ____________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.13/2009 Under Section 395 and 412 of IPC P.S. Rani Pokhari Rishikesh, District Dehradun ________________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Ms. Prabha Noliyal, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. GA for the State and perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the present applicant is not named in the F.I.R. When he was arrested by the Police, Rs.1,000/- was shown to be recovered from his possession. No such averment has been made in the FIR that Rs.1,000/- was robbed at the time of incident rather it was mentioned that one purse was robbed. It is further submitted that no idenfication parade was held in the jail to identify the present applicant. It is further submitted that the applicant has no criminal history and the trial of the case has yet not been started. After considering all the facts and circumstances; on hearing learned counsel for the parties; on perusal of the contents of the FIRs; and other papers available in file, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant-Ravi Kumar be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun. The bail application is disposed of accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 08.12.2009 RG