IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 3578 of 2011 Date of decision: 27.5.2011 Harchand Singh @ Chand Singh … Petitioner versus Makhan Singh ... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mrs. J.J.Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioner is the judgment-debtor in execution of the decree dated 29.11.2002. He is aggrieved with order dated 26.4.2011 passed by the Additional Civil Judge(Sr.Division), Phagwara, by dint of which his objections have been dismissed. The facts are that petitioner’s earlier objections were dismissed on 4.9.2010. He filed another objection petition on 25.11.2010 to the effect that the draft sale-deed is not in accordance with the decree passed in favour of the decree-holder. The objections were disposed of on 31.1.2011 with a direction to furnish a fresh draft sale-deed in accordance with the decree. The fresh sale-deed was filed on 17.2.2011. The present petitioner again filed similar objections which have been disposed of vide the impugned order. Hence, this revision. Heard. The decree-holder in reply to the objections took the stand that now the fresh draft sale-deed is in accordance with the decree as relevant khasra numbers have been mentioned in the same. A bare perusal of the impugned order indicates that the Court itself had compared the draft sale-deed and the decree and has come to the conclusion that the same is in accordance with the decree passed in favour of the decree-holder. The petitioner-judgment-debtor could not convince the Court below and this C.R. No. 3578 of 2011 -2- Court as well to show as to in what manner the same is not in accordance with the decree-sheet. Undisputedly, the decree has already been affirmed upto this Court. There is no infirmity in the order dismissing the objections. The revision petition stands dismissed. May 27, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE