THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.5780 of 2006 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the first respondent in according permission to respondent nos.3 to 6 to utilize the MACTS building belonging to the petitioner society at Chillakur Village and Mandal for Sanga Mithra activities (Velugu) without giving any prior notice and without taking consent of the petitioner society as illegal and arbitrary; accordingly to set aside the proceedings dated 31.01.2006 issued by the first respondent; and consequently to direct respondent Nos.1 and 3 to 6 not to interfere with peaceful possession of the said building by the petitioner society. Women residents at Chillakur Village formed into a society – Chillakur Mandal Podupu Lakshmi Mutually Aided Cooperative Thrift Society Limited (Mahila Bank) (for short ‘the petitioner society’) and the same was registered in 1998. After obtaining funds from the Member of Parliament concerned, the petitioner society started functioning from November, 2002, initially at the office building of the second respondent. Thereafter, they constructed the building in question for the purpose of running Mahila Bank and utilizing it as such. While so, when Community Coordinators working under Sanga Mithra started visiting the building in question frequently without any reason, the petitioner society raised objection and requested them not to enter into their building. However, at the instance of respondent Nos.3 to 6, the first respondent issued impugned proceedings dated 31.01.2006 granting permission to utilize the building in question for Sanga Mithra activities. The impugned proceedings were issued without giving prior notice and without taking consent of the petitioner society. Therefore, the petitioner society approached this Court. A perusal of the record shows that though Rule Nisi was ordered in the writ petition on 23.03.2006, but no interim order has been granted so far. The first respondent filed a counter-affidavit denying the allegations made in the writ petition. It is relevant to extract paragraph 6 thereof, which reads under: “In letter Rc.No.4-B-09, dated18.08.2009 the 2nd respondent (MPDO, Chillakur) has informed that MACTS building which was constructed in the premises of Mandal Complex is completely under occupation of Chillakur MACTS only. No other department like IKP or Panchayat Raj etc., have occupied so for.” In view of the counter averments extracted hereinabove, which disclose that the building in question is in the occupation of the petitioner society itself and the petitioner society having not denied the counter averments by filing a reply-affidavit, no grievance of the petitioner society can be said to be still subsisting in this writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. _______________________ N.V. RAMANA, J 04th June, 2010 GHN