IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD NOVEMBER 2011 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 31173 of 2011(V) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. WYSH.K., AGED 22, KARUTHEDATH HOUSE, KONIKKARA P.O., THRISSUR-680 306. 2. BENSON GEORGE, AGED 22, VARUVILA PUTHANVEEDU, MUTTIKULANGARA P.O., PALAKKAD-678 594. 3. ATHIRA.P., AGED 21, PARAPPURATH HOUSE, NARIKUNI VIA., CALICUT-673 585. 4. T.RADHIKA SARMA, AGED 21, CHATHAYAM THAIVALAPPIL HOUSE, PUDUKARA, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.SUNEER RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM-676 505. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM-676 505. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. SANTOSH MATHEW, SC, CALICUT UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/11/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.31173/2011 V APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS; P1A: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH THE CHALLAN RECEIPT OF THE 1ST PETITIONER. P1B: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH THE CHALLAN RECEIPT OF THE 2ND PETITIONER. P1C: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH THE CHALLAN RECEIPT OF THE 3RD PETITIONER. P1D: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH THE CHALLAN RECEIPT OF THE 4TH PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 31173 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are studying for B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 4th and 6th Semester examination was declared, they had failed in one or two papers. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge