IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.THANKAPPAN WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 23RD KARTHIKA 1929 CRL.A.No. 1483 of 2006() ------------------------ CRA.608/2005 of SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM .................... APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT: ----------- SREESAKTHI PAPER MILLS LTD., SRI.KAILAS, 39/2724, PALIYAM RAOD, COCHIN-16, A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 REP.BY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY MR.V.VINODKUMAR, S/O.RAMAN NAIR. BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED & STATE: ------------- 1. ANJANEYA ENTERPRISES, TRIVANDRUM, REP.BY ITS MG.PARTNER SRI.P.V.SURESH KUMAR, S/O.P.S.PADMANABHA PILLAI, TC 24/1648, SUSHANTH, THYCAUD, TRIVANDRUM-695 014. 2. SURESH, MG.PARTNER, M/S.ANJANEYA - ENTERPRISES, TC 24/1648, THYCAUD, TRIVANDRUM. 3. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. BY ADV. SRI.C.N.SREEKUMAR-R1 AND R2 SRI.K.MANOJCHANDRAN SRI.P.R.AJITHKUMAR SRI.V.M.KURIAN SRI.MATHEW B. KURIAN SRI.K.T.THOMAS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. THOMAS JOHN AMBOOKKAN - R3 THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.THANKAPPAN, J. ---------------------------------------------- CRL. APPEAL NO. 1483 OF 2006 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of November, 2007 JUDGMENT This appeal is filed against the judgment in Crl. Appeal No.608 of 2005 on the files of the Sessions Court, Ernakulam. The appellant is the complainant in C.C. No.434 of 2001 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court II, Ernakulam. 2. When the appeal came up for hearing today, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the matter has been settled out of Court and hence the appellant does not propose to prosecute the case further. The parties have already filed an application under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,1881 for compounding the offence. Since no offence is found against the accused, there is no question of compounding. However, in the light of the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant that the appellant does not want to prosecute CRL.APPEAL NO.1483/2006 2 the matter, the Crl. Appeal is dismissed, confirming the judgment of the trial court. (K.THANKAPPAN, JUDGE) sp/ CRL.APPEAL NO.1483/2006 3 K. THANKAPPAN, J. CRL.A. NO. JUDGMENT OCTOBER, 2007