IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 13461 of 1993 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.R.SHAH ======================================================== 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? --------------------------------------------------------- DR K R VASAVADA Versus AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPAORATION --------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 13461 of 1993 MR GIRISH PATEL for Petitioner No. 1 MR MR ANAND for Respondent No. 1-2 --------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.R.SHAH Date of decision: 02/04/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT By way of present Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Dr. K.R. Vasavada has approached this Court challenging decision of respondent No.2 to discontinue his services as Hon'rary Associate Professor of Neurology with effect from 1.12.1993. This Court (Coram: N.J. Pandya, J.) has admitted the petition on 12.7.1994 and interim relief was refused. 2. Today, when the present Special Civil Application is called out for final hearing, Shri Shrimali appearing for Mr. Girish Patel, learned advocate for the petitioner makes a statement that they have tried their best to contact the petitioner but they are not in position to contact the petitioner as there is no instruction from the petitioner since last 2 to 3 years. Therefore he submitted that an appropriate order may be passed at this stage and in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, he is not pressing the present Special Civil Application with a liberty to revive the petition in case of difficulty. Order accordingly. The petition is dismissed as having not pressed at this stage. Rule is discharged. rmr. [ M.R. Shah, J. ]