CFOWWS'91"e'o "T;»,^- ".^.? 'f'.:..:^.v ^ /V/ / ^y, IH 'EHE HIGH COBKT OS" ISSDH2'A PRSEESH A'r JSBAX^POK; CriHiiaal j^ipeal Ho. 1)'1 o£ 199S9 Apnellstit i- Sffit. asaal.bai. wi£e o£ SstaaFa Goad' aged gi3oat 60 yrs, / resLdsat o£^ sctor 6 / y JbojEana- Behtaia:Ett)li.ce lAne, fihilaL distt Eorg /H.p. ve r sa s Be sooadsnt s- State ofi M.p. ttoroagh p.S. Bhilal. eonvicUon u/s 302 IPC.7 u/s 201 IPC/ Sentenoe R.I. for llfe/ R.I. for 5 yrs/ (Sentence to ran eoncarrea-tly ) y^ ,'svv if; CScjBaiaal apBeal aader sectioa 374/ Gr. P.G, -^ XI-HC-78 iTprargp'n^ <jw|'^liyiri<4,y-nlwi®,Rlrti"<iy „„......,.Q.&..^^^^.... W^200 3IT^?TTR<P (ijdtgq.fi) aii^nmfS'ii* <raT3lrtSTiRWR 'pRnaR^iftei an^n U.B: UON'BLB SHRI FAKHRUJ HON'BLE SHRI DILIP RAOSAH^IfEMIMUKIL JJ 26.07.2005 None appears for the appe Shri Akhil Mishra, P.L. for flil<<fri<i1-1 llldl'^'fo'd '(fatsit ^3lf^»T3IltW DIN, lant. Ithe, State. Counsel for the State su^mits that the appellant has been released from the Central Jail, Raipur on 4.6.1996, on account of grant ofprobatiori. The absence of the appel iridicative of the fact that the apj lant and his counsel is also lellant is no longer interested in pursuing this appeal any morej. In the above circuinstancejs and in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the|case o{ Sam Naresh Tetdav and others vs. Stette of Bihalr reported in AIS 1987 SC 1500, the appeal is dismissed for| non-prosecution. 1 ( 'AT3 ,a'»^/ Fakhruddin - Judge Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge