IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE FRIDAY, THE 31ST OCTOBER 2008 / 9TH KARTHIKA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1566 of 2008(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.7592/2008 Dated 19/03/2008 .................... PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS --------------- K.V.RAMACHANDRAN, AGED 53 YEARS S/O EDADAN PUTHIYA VEETTIL GOVINDAN NAIR ( DIED) P.O. EDAT, VIA PAYYANUR, KANNUR BY ADV. SRI.M.V.AMARESAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.1 --------------- ISHITHA ROY AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,J. ------------------------ C.O.C. 1566/2008 IN W.P.(C)No. 7592/2008 ------------------------ Dated this the 31st of October, 2008 JUDGMENT As rightly pointed out by the learned Government Pleader, directions in Annexure A-1 judgment is addressed to the 2nd respondent Land Acquisition Officer and not to the District Collector. It is seen that the District Collector has been arrayed as respondent in the Contempt of Court Case. This Contempt of Court Case is closed, however giving liberty to the petitioner to file fresh Contempt of Court Case arraying the 2nd respondent in the writ petition as a party. (PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE) dpk