1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application (CAA) No.135 of 2010 In Appeal against Order Stamp No.13858 of 2010 (Rajesh s/o Hiraman Nitnaware and others v. Smt. Manjulabai wd/o Hiraman Nitnaware and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri M. Anilkumar, Advocate for Applicants. Shri A.K. Choube, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 5. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 17 th February, 2011 This is an application for condonation of delay of 140 days caused in filing an appeal against order. Notice was issued in this matter on 24-9-2010. In pursuance thereof, Shri Choube, the learned counsel, appears for respondent Nos.1 to 5 and has filed reply. The application states the reasons for seeking condonation of delay. The facts stated in para 4 of the application are not disputed. What is urged by Shri Choube, the learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 5, is that the averments made in para 5 of the application are totally vague and unspecific and the relevant dates are not given. Shri Anilkumar, the learned counsel appearing for the applicants, submits that it is his mistake in drafting the 2 application. In view of this, the delay of 140 days caused in filing an appeal against order is condoned, subject to costs of Rs.500/- to be paid to the respondent Nos.1 to 5. The application stands disposed of accordingly. Put up the matter for admission on 3-3-2011. Shri Choube, the learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 5, waives service of notice in appeal against order. Interim order to continue. Judge pdl