-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil First Appeal No.52 of 2010 Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Ajmer and Others VERSUS Sumer Singh son of Shri Begraj Jangid Date of Order :::: 17th February, 2010. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Mr. Inderjeet Singh, Counsel for the defendant-appellants *** By the Court : Though, this is a regular first appeal, under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, however, from the judgment, I do not find any error so as to call for any interference in this appeal. Learned counsel for the defendant-appellants sought to contend that the claimant is the brother of the deceased and, therefore, he would not come within the purview of the dependent. The learned trial Court has found that under the Fatal Accident Act the brother is also a dependent, if he does not have any other sources of the income and was dependent on the deceased. -2- So far as award of compensation is concerned, the learned trial Court has not committed any error in determining the compensation on account of the loss to the estate of the deceased in the facts and circumstances of this case. In the facts and circumstances, I do not find any good ground to interfere with the impugned judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court, wherein an amount of Rs.1,28,000/- has been awarded on account of the death by electrocution of the deceased. The appeal as well as the stay application are accordingly dismissed summarily. (Dalip Singh), J. Ashok/