IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R. S. A. No. 4025 of 2006 (O&M) Date of decision : April 22, 2008 Shulinder Singh and others ....Appellants versus Bikkar Singh ....Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pritam Pal Present : Mr. Tribhawan Singla, Advocate for the appellants Pritam Pal,J. (Oral) This regular second appeal by plaintiffs is directed against judgment and decree dated 1.9.2005 passed by learned trial court whereby a suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction in respect of the suit property, was dismissed. Thereafter appeal filed by the appellants was also dismissed vide judgment and decree dated 8.3.2006 passed by learned first appellate court. This is how feeling aggrieved, the appellants have come up in this appeal. Now the only contention of learned counsel for the appellants is that the Will dated 27.7.1993 executed in favour of defendant-respondent Bikkar Singh by Smt. Gurdev Kaur is surrounded by suspicious circumstances, therefore, the same should not have been held valid by the courts below. However, after going through the impugned judgments and the material placed on the file, it is apparent that the Will dated 27.7.1993 R. S. A. No. 4025 of 2006 (O&M) -2- executed by Gurdev Kaur was also registered before the Sub Registrar on the same day. The appellants had also contested the Will before the revenue authorities but could not succeed and thereafter, the same was challenged before the Civil Court. Now there are concurrent findings of the courts below that the Will is registered one and has been duly proved by the attesting witnesses. The findings arrived at in this regard by the courts below are not perverse or unreasonable in any manner. Moreover, learned counsel for the appellants could not make out any substantial question of law involved in this appeal for consideration by this Court. Hence, this appeal is dismissed in limine. Since the main appeal is dismissed in limine, so no order is required to be passed on the application for condonation of delay in refiling the appeal. ( Pritam Pal ) April 22, 2008 Judge 'dalbir'