1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUD ICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3648 /2009 [Dadarao Haridas Indurkar vs. State of Maharashtra ) ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr A. S. Mardikar,Adv.for applicant Mr S.B.Ahirkar,APP for Respondent .......... CORAM : A.P.BHANGALE, J. DATED : MARCH 10, 2010 . Heard submission at the Bar. 2 It appears that sessions trial No. 35/2008 is pending before 1st Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge Amravati for several offences under the IPC. In fact it appears from the the report of Addl.Sessions Judge that on the dates of hearing in the sessions case, the case was adjourned for various reasons, such as non-production of the accused from the Jail, application for adjournments made by the accused form time to time on account of medical treatment etc. In fact, this Court while deciding Cri. Appln. No. 3567 /2009 on 4.1.2010 observed that the applicant Dadarao Indurkar is merely interested in prolonging the trial which is for a serious charge of murder. Under these circumstances, prayer for bail on the ground that there is no headway in the trial cannot be entertained. The applicant himself was responsible for 2 the sorry state of affairs. For these reasons bail application is rejected. It is expected that the applicant shall cooperate with the early hearing in sessions trial No.35/2008 pending before learned Addl. Sessions Judge Amravati. JUDGE sahare