1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.04.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD)No.5309 of 2011 I.Thanaseeli : Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli District. 2.The District Educational Officer, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Kilapavoor, Tirunelveli District. : Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.03.2011 within a stipulated time. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Muthudurai For Respondents : Mr.V.Rajasekaran, Spl.G.P. ORDER ****** Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2.By consent of both the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing. 3.The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition for a Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.03.2011 within a stipulated time. 4.The case of the petitioner is that she has completed B.Sc., Degree and also completed Teacher Training Course. She had been appointed as Secondary Grade Assistant Teacher in T.D.T.A. Primary and Middle Schools, Melamaignanapuram, Tenkasi on 22.01.2010. The appointment was made by the Correspondent of the Diocese of Tirunelveli. The said school is a Government aided school and controlled by Diocese of Tirunelveli. Thereafter, the petitioner's appointment has been approved by the Assistant Elementary Educational Officer. Now, she has been working as a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Teacher for the past 15 months from the date of her appointment. However, till date she has not received any salary. The 3rd respondent has not released the grant for her salary. 5. Seeking such relief, the petitioner has sent a representation dated 23.03.2011 to the 3rd respondent and since the same has not been considered so far, the petitioner has come up with the present writ petition for the relief stated earlier. 6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the 3rd respondent to consider the represented dated 23.03.2011, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid direction. No costs. arul SD/- DEPUTY REGISTRAR[ACCOUNTS] /TRUE COPY/ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1.The Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli District. 2.The District Educational Officer, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Kilapavoor, Tirunelveli District. +1 cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No.16326. Order made in W.P.(MD)No.5309 of 2011 Dated:29.04.2011 2P/5C RPB 19.05.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/