IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 16497 of 2008. Decided on: 20.07.2010. _____________________________________________________ Hem Singh. …Petitioner. -Versus- Secretary, H.P. Board of School Education. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. T.C. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent. : Mr. G.D. Sharma, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. T.C. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his relief to prayer Clause No.-III. It has come in the reply that as far as prayer Class No.-III is concerned, the matter is under consideration. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to take a final decision in the matter within a period of three weeks from today and to refund the amount to the petitioner with interest @6% per annum. No costs. Copy dasti, on usual terms. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 20, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?