IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1167 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6769 of 2003 With Interlocutory Application No. 5664 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.1167 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Ashok Kumar Sharma S/O Sri Brajnandan Prasad Singh R/O Vill.- Dharnai, P.O.- Beraka (Ner), P.S.- Makhdumpur, Distt.- Jehanabad (Bihar) working as Clerk, Primary Helath Centre, Makhdumpur, Distt.- Jehanabad (Bihar) formerly at Additional Primary Health Centre, Bakhtari, Distt.- Arwal (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner-Appellant Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The Secretary, Department of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4. The Director in Chief, Medical Services, Department of Health Govt. of Bihar, Patna 5. The Civil Surgeon cum Chief Medical Officer, Jehanabad-cum-Arwal 6. The Civil Surgeon cum Chief Medical Officer, Nawadah 7. The District Magistrate, Jehanabad 8. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Jehanabad 9. The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya 10. The Additional Collector, Gaya 11. The Medical Officer, In-Charge, Additional Primary Health Centre, Bakhtari (Karpai), Arwal 12. Shri Ramesh Mishra, Civil Surgeon-Cum-Chief Medical Officer, Jehanabad cum Arwal .... .... Respondents/Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant : Mr. Munna Prasad Dixit, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Prabhat Kr. Singh, A.C. to GA-1 Patna High Court LPA No.1167 of 2011 (6) dt.05-09-2011 2 / 2 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 6. 05-09-2011 Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 23rd August 2010 passed by the learned single Judge in above C.W.J.C. No. 6769 of 2003 the writ petitioner has preferred the present Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. The challenge is in respect of the direction issued by the learned single Judge to the Director-in-Chief, Health Services to complete the enquiry in respect of the legality of the appointment of the appellant. Learned advocate Mr. M.P.Dixit has appeared for the appellant. He has submitted that earlier twice the enquiry was conducted and the Additional Collector had opined that the appointment of the appellant is valid. Nevertheless, the appellant is called upon to face the enquiry. No case for interference is made out. The Appeal is dismissed in limine. The appellant will cooperate in enquiry so as to get it completed as early as possible. At least before the appellant reaches the age of superannuation. Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. Pawan/- (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)