IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24035 of 2010 MURARI KUMAR @ VISHAL KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 03.08.2010 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that in the physical examination test for the post of constable, in place of his brother the petitioner appeared. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that it was actually the brother of the petitioner who was the beneficiary and the petitioner was not caught while impersonating his brother in the physical test. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. However, learned Court below will consider regular bail application of the petitioner on the ground that petitioner was actually not caught while impersonating his brother and subsequently on the statement of his brother the case has been registered against the petitioner. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)