1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3069 OF 2011 Mr.Dinesh Singh Lakra .. Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.A.M.Saraogi for the petitioner. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, APP for the State/Respondent No.1. Mr.M.S.Mohite with Mr.G.S.Keluskar for Respondent No.2. Mr.S.A.Nalawade, API, EOW Unit-3 present. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE: 12th December, 2011. P.C.: 1. The petitioner has approached this Court by way of present petition for quashing of FIR No.4 of 2007 registered with the Economic Offences Wing for the offence under Section 420 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code. 2. The petition is founded on the assertion that the petitioner’s name has not been shown in the FIR, but according to the petitioner in the chargesheet which is filed against the accused the petitioner has been shown as the wanted accused. 3. In the first place the petitioner has not produced copy of the chargesheet filed against the accused named in the FIR in question. Secondly, the learned APP, on instructions from API 2 Mr.Nalawade, EOW, Unit-3, states that the chargesheet does not describe the petitioner as wanted accused. At the same time, it is stated that the Investigating Officer is inquiring into the matter about the involvement of the petitioner in connection with the said offence. The petitioner has not co-operated so far. He did not attend the police station when he was called upon to do so. This factual position, however, is disputed by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. It is not necessary for us to enter into this controversy for the time being. The fact remains that the petitioner has not been named as accused in the FIR No.4 of 2007, nor in the chargesheet filed before the appropriate Court in connection with the said FIR. If it is so, it is premature to entertain this petition. Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move the Court for appropriate relief as and when occasion arises. 5. We place on record that the petitioner must extend full co- operation to the Investigating Officer for further investigation in connection with the FIR in question. Petition is disposed of accordingly. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)