s ..j vy",. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^ns s^w^ CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) N0. 3<> LS OF 2011 PETITIONERS : J^ ^^' ^^?>' ^%^'c ^y^%^ ^^ \^^ Kiran Ojha, D/o Shri Uday Narayan Ojha, aged about 23 years, R/o Sundar Nagar, Sitapur, District Sarguja (CG). Geeta Gupta, W/o Shri Ganesh Gupta, aged about 37 years, R/o Purani Basti, Sitapur, District Sarguja (CG). Suman Verraa, W/o Shri Sharad Kumar Verma, aged about 31 years, R/o Near Nagar Panchayat, Sitapur, District Sarguja (CG). Sumitra Minj, W/o Shri Raja Mohan, aged about 32 years, R/o PO Khadadorna, Sitapur, District Sarguja (CG). Reena Gupta, D/o Shri Ashok Gupta, aged about 27 years, R/o Near Nagar Panchayat, Sitapur, District Sarguja (CG). Arti Tripathi, D/o Shri Girija Shankar Tripathi, aged about 30 years, R/o Near Nagar Panchayat, Sitapur, District Sarguja (CG). Versus CONTEMNOR/ RESPONDENT Shri G.S. Dhananjay, Collector, Sarguja, District Sarguja (CG). c^- CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215^ QF 'FHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA_READ WITH SECTJON 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OFCOURTS ACT. 197 1. J^ i^ an^i w K.-U* ^8TT 37T^?T iib*1 w WWftt (hMlcR 'S^ '^TrqMq, ®tl1<H<l<o, jslcfK-iy .L6.^.:.Le^lQ.^^i .200 W^l 'tpW (ipfgil^q) TOIIW ^fttf sn^i SB : Hon'bte Shri Manindra BBohan Shrivastava, J.I 19.9.2011 Shri Jitendra Shrivastai <~ Shri J.P. Shukla, coiuis Heard. This petition has been disobedience of Che order CourtinW.P. (S) N0.7421/1Q flled by fhe petitioners aUeging wiUful da|ted 19th April, 2011 passed by this Leamed counsel for the| that fhe petitioners had and though the payments, ^s Coiirt, have been released petitioner No.3 is concemejd entifled to salary for 17 released only in respect of l^ respondent had no intentic>4 chi<4t<n41i HW?ff ^f fs^ ^f^T^K ^sTfinsn^T 'a, counsel for fhe petitioners. il for the respondent. petitioners, at fhe outset, submitted proached fhe respondent/Collector s were directed to be inade by the to aU the petitioners, as far as accordtng to her claim, she is nths, whereas fhe salaiy has been months. mdnths Leamed counsel for t|ie respondent submitted that fhe to flout the order of fhe Court In compliance offhe order offhe Court, the respondent obtained the pay-slips of fhe petitioners fi-om Block Education OSoes-, Sitapur ./^ ^ /^' XI-HG—78 'S^t '^q^q, ®TTl^ll<o,fi(<yliyy,< ^WW (hHlcb W^l TT^ ('yl^^) 3l^T ^I (<;•<!<* wn sn^r 's»itii<ti Praveea. aad based on fhe pay-sllps concemed ofB.ee, the salaiy of |and certificate obtained from fhe ^ll fhe petitioners has been paid. In view of the submissiofi •<- the Court by leamed counse| avennents made in the repty, am not Inclined to proceed (i, whlch is now beu% made before ^ for the respondent and also fhe far as respondent is concemed, I in fhe matter. as finther The rule is fherefore di^chai^ed would be at liberty to take rejcc available to fhem against (he on whose report/certlficate/d^t been made. Wifh fhe aforesaid disposed of. chi*i^4ii TrR^f ^f 'fe^S' <pii^i< ^Tsjfgifsnt^T 1. However, fhe petMloners pourse to such remedy as may be ^oncemed Block Education of&cer, etaU prepared, fhe payauents have ob^ervattons, fhe petition is finalty Sd/- . Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge