HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONERS 4. b. 7. R. o 10, 2. 3. 4- o. G. WRiT PETJTION (S) No. 1724 of 2009 Akhilesh Singh Yadav S/o Rajkumar Suigh Yadav, Aged about 20 years, R/o Chaado Road, Balraiupur, District Snrguja (CG) Udhaai Singh S/o Laxinan Singh, Aged aboiu 23 years, R/o village TaagannaJ-iari, Post Balrampur, District Surguja (CG) Gaurav Qiipta S/o Kameshwar Rrasad Gupta, Aged about 20 yeai-s, R/o village Jhalpi, Post Maharajganj, District Surguja (CG) Sitaram Pandey S/o Ramawatar Paadey, Aged about 29 years, R/o Balrainplir, Disti-ict Surguja (CG) Chaudrabhushaa Gupta S/o Goviiid Prasad Gupta, Aged about 34 years, R/'o v-fflage Kotsari, Post Daura, Block Bahainpur, Disti-ict Surguja (CG) Ku. Supriya Mishra, D/o Upeadra Mishra, Aged about 20 years, R/o Baidar Block Balranipur, District Surguja (CG) Ku. Sangeeta Mandal D/'o Shankar Maadal, Aged ab out 20 years, R/o Niharika Studio, Baaaras Road, Near of Gandhi Nagar Dehat, Police. Station Am.bikapiir, District Surguja i;CG) Shivpujan Pal S/o Akshayivar Pal, Aged abQUt 24 years, R/o viRage Jabar, , Post MMaliarajgauj, District Surguja (CG) Ku. Tara Vishwas, D/o Gokul Vishwas, Aged about 20 years, R/o vitlage Rajnnagai'kala, Post Balrampur, District Surguja. (CG) Ramuaravan S/o Lagaa Ram, Aged about 24 years, R/o vTllage Sewari, TEA.SII Rajpur, District Sm-guja (CG) \^ERSUS State of Chliattisgarh tlirough: Secretary, Panchayat & Gramia Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Shawan, Raiplir District Raipur (CG) CoUector, Aiiibikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) Jaxipad Paachayat, Balrainpur, Tbrough: Chief Executive Officer, Jaapad. Panchayat Balrampur, Disnict Surguja (CG) Chief Executive Officer, Jaapad Pan.chayat, Balraiapur, District Surguja (CGj Zila Paiichayat, Surguja, fhrough its Chief Executive Ofiicer, Ziia panchayat, Surguja, District Surguja (CG) Block Education Of&cer, Balrampur, District Surguja (CG) 1 '"••»>. "®"a& s t? 'Y--rf!'JF PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ••?,. zi Shri Manoj Paraiijpe, Advocate for fhe petitioners. Shri Arun Sao, Govemiaent Advocate or fhe State/respondent No. 1, 2 and 6. SIu-i Pankaj Shrivastava, Advocate for ftie respondent No. 4. (Passed on 30th day of JiUy, 2009) Heard leamed counsel appearuig for tlie parties. Leamed counsel appearmg for the respondent No. Officer, fairly subniit that fhe issue iiivolved ia this case asto whefher fhe petitioners, who are Sbiksha Kannis, have been aifonled aa opportlinity of hearing before termination from. tlieir post, caiae into consideration before this Court ui the inatter of Ku. Punam and ofhers v. State of Chhaitisgarh Oihers1. Leamed counsel fui-ttier subiuits tliat stace no proper opportmiiw was afforded to the petitioners before termmation, fbe aufhorities shaU take appropriate steps i& teftns of fbe judgiaent aiid order passed iu Ku. Puriam (supra), before passiag any order. The couceraed aufhorifies wiil try to coinplete the wliole exercise wifhia a period of three weeks. TIie Chief Executive Ofiicer has passed fhe mipugned order of reiaoval, !n view of foregoirig, according to learaed counsel appearuig for the petitioners, notbiiig survives ia this petition for adjudication. Havilig resard to tlie facts situation of fhe case aiid fhe iudgiuent passed in the niatter of Ku. Puniim (supra), the impugned renioval order dated 28.02.2009 (Annexure P/ 1) is qiiasbed. However, liberfrf- is resereed to the respondents/authorities to take appropriate steps ia accordance with law. Consequently, fhe writ petition is disposed^of, Sd/- . . SatishK.Agnihotn Judge 2008 (2) CGLJ 366