3‘4 u 2¢ s. 3 $3. nwgqamHwDawww 7.; asm. mm .x$§a§ v.3:m§§§ 22:». :H1 gmniuaaanwagig admAAqmwgmv QEKiwwm l / \ l \ \.u\v \“ $31. gm Eqmmm Egmugxagmq‘ mmgdwglgagg g mam ? . um:§m agammg Ml gag AH. wa-m§§ma§§ . glg Aqgav .nl QuEm . gummmagwag .. a- EaENmwagaag . v mmzwaégw §I§A§.V §n§s §§¢E¢m§l3 - gwH—Aagg v. A..u. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W WP. (S) No. 3501 of 2005 Petitioner Dadoo Singh Pate! Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Shri S. C. Nande , Advocate for the petitioneri V. V. S. Munhy, Deputy Advocate Genera: with Smt. Anju Abuja, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondentsIState. ORDER The foilowing order oi the Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. . The petitioner while working as Assistant Teacher in Primary School. Bhathakona, Tahsil — Sarangarh. District — Raigarh was transferred to Primaly School. Kapartunga. on the same terms and conditions. vide order dated 26.7.2000 (Annexure N1}. . The Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal atRaipur white admitting the petition vide order dated 12.1.2001. did not grant the interim relief. as it was not prayed. . In view of the above. with the passage of time this petition has become infructuous as period oi transfer is not appiicable forever. At this point of time there is no question to examine the validity of the transfer order. However. the respondents are at iiberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in view the public interest and administrative exigency. 4. 1n view of the above. this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. ‘ Sd/- .i ‘ Satish K. Agnihotri l ( Passed on this 9‘“ day of March. 2007) Thakur f3 ii Judge r