IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 13TH OCTOBER 2008 / 21ST ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 25753 of 2008(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- 1. JOSE A. THOMAS, AGED 57, S/O. LATE THOMAS, AMBAZHACHALIL HOUSE, KOZHIPPILLY, KOTHAMANGALAM. 2. P.K. PAILY @ BABY, AGED 58, S/O. KURIAKOSE, PAZHUKKALIL STORES, SHOP OWNER, KOTHAMANGALAM. BY ADV. SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, COCHIN. 2. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHUTHI BHAVAN, TRIVANDRUM. 3. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, PERUMBAVOOR. 4. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, PERUMBAVOOR. 5. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, K.S.E.B, SECTION NO.2, KOTHAMANGALAM. 6. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ERNAKULAM. 7. ELDHO P. JOHN, AGED 27, S/O.P.M. JOHNY, PALAKKADAVAN HOUSE, THANKAELAM, KOTHAMANGALAM. R1 & R6 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. BEJOY CHADNRAN ADV. SRI.C.T.JOSEPH FOR R7 SRI.ROSHIN IPE JOSEPH FOR R7 SRI.JOE POLLAYIL FOR R7 SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B FOR R2 TO 5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No. 25753 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 13th day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioners challenge Ext.P1. Ext.P1 is an order passed by the Additional District Magistrate, Ernakulam. There was a writ petition filed against the said order as W.P.(C) 13783 of 2008. That came to be filed by the Vicar of Marthoma Cheriya Pally, Kothamangalam. That writ petition came to be dismissed and writ appeal was carried. The Division Bench set aside the judgment in the writ petition and the matter is remitted to the Magistrate, submits the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and also the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the party respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners may be permitted to represent their grievances before the Magistrate including jurisdiction. Without expressing any view on the matter, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make their submissions also before the Magistrate when the matter is taken up pursuant to the order passed by the Division Bench. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb