IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35219 of 2008 Dukha Yadav, son of Late Sumrit Yadav, resident of at Laxminia, P.O.- Nandlali, P.S.- Bihra, District-Saharsa….Petitioner-Complainant. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Khusilal Yadav @ Tulay Yadav, son of Late Kanik Yadav, resident at Laxminia, P.O.- Nandlali, P.S.- Bihra, District-Saharsa. 3. Navin Kumar Verma, son of Late Gajadhar Lal Das of Village- Patori, P.S. Bihra, District-Saharsa. ……Opposite Parties. ----------- 2. 09. 02. 09. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to Opposite Party Nos. 2 and 3 in A.B.A. No. 194/2008 in connection with Complaint Case No. 1100/2006. Initially a police case was instituted in which Final Form was submitted as the case being one of the civil nature. Thereafter, the case has proceeded on Protest-cum-Complaint petition. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to cancel the bail granted to Opposite Party Nos. 2 and 3. However, the Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and Opposite Party Nos. 2 and 3 will not physically absent for two consecutive dates till three witnesses are examined. It would be open to the parties to arrive at a compromise if so advised preferably within six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. m.p. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)