..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1003 OF 2008 Shri.Manoj Yashwant Gaikwad. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.Gopal V. Bhagat, Adv. for applicant. Ms.A.T.Jhaveri, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 21st August, 2008. DATED : 21st August, 2008. DATED : 21st August, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.144 of 2008 of Murbad Police Station. The said case is under Sections 498A, 306, 304(B) r/w. 34 of Indian Penal Code. 3. The applicant is the husband of Karuna. Karuna was found dead in her matrimonial house. The cause of death is asphyxia due to hanging. The main allegations are against the applicant. The complainant has stated that in the marriage ..(2).. also, the applicant had made demand for chain and ring. The complainant could not fulfil the demand of chain. During Ganpati festival, Karuna came to the house of her parents. She informed that her husband had told her to get Rs.90,000/- from her parents. Thereafter the applicant and other family members started ill-treating and harassing karuna as the demand of chain and Rs.90,000/- was not met. There are other allegations also against the applicant in the FIR. No doubt the other accused persons have been released on bail. However, it is seen that the main allegations are against the applicant. 4. Looking to the material on record, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant bail to the applicant. Application for bail is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)