IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34206 of 2010 SUMITRA DEVI wife of Ganesh Mahto r/o village- Muradpur Bangra, PS- Bangra, District- Samastipur…. Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 05.10.2010 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as with regard to grant to bail to the petitioner in connection with for offence under Section 366(A)/34 I.P.C. and also found that the victim girl has herself admitted before the police to have been married the brother of the petitioner and even then on being recovered after five days she in her statement u/s 164 Cr.P.C. has made no allegation against the brother of the petitioner with whom she was allegedly married, would by itself be a good ground for grant of bail to the petitioner inasmuch allegation against her is confined to rendering assistance to his brother. That being so, this Court would direct for release of the petitioner, namely, Sumitra Devi on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of – Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with – Tajpur (Bangra) P. s. Case No. 168 of 2010, subject to the 2 following conditions:- (i) The two bail bonds will be furnished, one by the Government servant and the other by a close family relative. (ii) The petitioner will remain present in course of trial on each and every day and her absence even for a single day would automatically entail the consequences of cancellation of her bail. (iii) The petitioner in case is now made accused in any other criminal case, that would itself lead to cancellation of her bail. Subject to the aforementioned conditions, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)