In the Punjab and Haryana High Court, at Chandigarh. CRM-M-20958 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on July 14,2011 Narender Singh --Petitioner vs. State of Haryana --Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. M.K.Garg,Advocate, for the petitioner Rakesh Kumar Jain,J:(Oral) This is an application for anticipatory bail in a case registered vide FIR No.125 dated 07.6.2011 under Sections 323,376,511 to which Section 506 of the IPC was added later on at Police Station DLF Phase- II City, District Gurgaon. Allegation against the petitioner is that he took the complainant in his Mercedes Car for showing her flat which she wanted to take on rent. The petitioner had allegedly consumed beer on the way and started teasing her in order to commit rape. The complainant had resisted the attempt of the petitioner and in the scuffle, her shirt was torn and she scratched the face of the petitioner. It is further alleged against the petitioner that when he found that he would not be able to succeed in his nefarious design, he threw the petitioner from the running car. Learned counsel further submits that he has been falsely implicated in this case because he is the property dealer and the complainant is working at the behest of other property dealer. He has submitted that from the facts and circumstances of the case, at the most, a case under Section 354 of the IPC CRM-M-20958 of 2011 (O&M) -2- is made out against the petitioner, which is bailable. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record from which I have found that the allegations against the petitioner are serious in nature inasmuch as he has been booked under Sections 376/511 of the IPC. Therefore, keeping in view the seriousness of the offences, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence the application is hereby dismissed. July 14,2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge