IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 16464 of 2008. Decided on: 16.3.2011 Biri Singh ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others. ....Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : None. For the respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3. None for respondent No. 4. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) The present petition is rendered infructous with the passage of time, since the impugned order was passed in the year 2006. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructous, so also the pending applications(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge March 16, 2011. (hl) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.