-1- DB CWP 15320/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No.15320 of 2010. Chunni Lal @ Surendra son of Shri Mali Ram VERSUS State of Rajasthan & Others Dat e of Order :::: 15.12.2010. Hon'ble Mr. J ust ic e Dalip Singh Hon'ble Dr. J ust ic e Meena V. Gom ber Mr. Anshuman Saxena, Counsel for the Petitioner Mr. Rajendra Yadav, Govt. Advocate for the State **** By the Court :- This petition has been preferred by the petitioner– Chunni Lal @ Surendra son of Shri Mali Ram for being released on third regular parole for 40-days, as his application was rejected by the Advisory Committee vide Annexure-1 in the minutes of the meeting held on 23rd July, 2010. As per the aforesaid report, the case of the petitioner finds reference in Para No.21 of the order passed by the Advisory Committee, wherein it has specifically been recorded that the conduct of the petitioner in jail was unsatisfactory. As per Rule 9 of the Rajasthan Prisoners (Release on Parole) Rules, 1958 the condition precedent is that the conduct of the prisoner in jail should be satisfactory. Accordingly, we find no error in the order passed by the Advisory Committee with reference to the petitioner– -2- DB CWP 15320/2010 Chunni Lal @ Surendra. This petition accordingly deserves to be dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that subsequently as per the nominal roll the conduct of the petitioner has been found to be satisfactory and, therefore, his case may now be considered by this Court. So far as the aforesaid prayer is concerned, we refrain to accept the same, however, liberty is granted to the petitioner that he may apply afresh for the grant of parole in accordance with the rules, which application shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law. Consequently, petition is dismissed. (Dr.Meena V. Gom ber) J . (Dalip Singh) J. Ashok/