1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO: 8017/2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO: 3336/2002 (Lalitshankar Sonilal Purohit vs. R.B.Shreeram ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders. .................................................................................................................................................................. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI , J. DATED: 28TH JANUARY, 2008. *** Heard Mr. Jagdale, learned counsel for petitioner and Mr.S N Bhattad for Respondent. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that he has already submitted solvent surety in the trial Court. However, it is submitted that if learned trial Judge is not satisfied with the solvent surety, the petitioner shall submit fresh solvent surety to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge, within a period of four weeks from the date of order that would be passed by learned trial Judge only in the event if he is not satisfied with the solvent surety already furnished. 3. Mr. Bhattad, learned counsel appearing on behalf Respondent submits that it is only after the present 2 Civil Application was filed, the petitioner has submitted solvent surety and, as such, the interim order passed by this Court on 15th Sept. 2005 is liable to be vacated. 4. However, taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has substantially complied with the direction as stated in the order dated 15th September, 2007 thereby depositing an amount of Rs. 2 lakhs and is regularly paying rent at the rate of Rs. 1500, I am not inclined to entertain the present Civil Application. The same stands rejected. JUDGE sahare