IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.1879 of 1992. SUIT NO.1879 of 1992. SUIT NO.1879 of 1992. Kantilal Shantilal Javeri ..Plaintiff versus Air India ..Defendant None for the Plaintiff Mr.Kamat for the Defendants CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 22nd Sept., 2008. DATED : 22nd Sept., 2008. DATED : 22nd Sept., 2008. P.C. 1. Evidence affidavit is not filed though sufficient time was granted. Today also nobody is present on behalf of the plaintiffs. 2. Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.)