rq $- 19* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO 161/2002 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Kumar Rajesh Singh, Adv. versus PARMANAND MALHOTRA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Adv. CORAM: .<; HON,BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDTIARTH MRIDUL l- oRpER o/o 19.07.201-0 CM L232412OLO (Exemption) AIIowed subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. cM !2323t201O This is an application on behalf of the appellant seeking permission -C to withdraw the decretai uilorrrrt of Rs.2,l- 6,460/- deposited by the t appellant in compliance to the order of this Court dated the 20th August, 2002. Notice. Counsel appears on behalf of the LRs of deceased/respondent and does not oppose the application. The appellant preferred the present appeal against the judgment and final order dated L2th December, 200t whereby the Railway Claims FAO 767,/2002 Page 1. of? Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified %?,\ Tribunal was pleased to allow the claim petition of the deceased/respondent. This Court was pleased to stay the execution of the decree subject to the appellant depositing the entire d.ecretal amount vide order dated 20th August, 2002. In compliance to the order of this Court dated the 20th August, 2O02 the appellant had deposited the decretal amount of Rs.2,l-6,460/- vide cheque bearing No.017272 dated 22od october, 2002. On 11-th April, 2005 this Court passed an order that since had been taken by the appellant to bring the legal heirs deceased/respondent on record, the appeal thereby stood abated. The legal heirs of the respondent filed a miscellaneous application for paynrent of the decretal amount with interest @ j,2o/o bef.ore the Railway Claims Tribunal. The Railway Claims Tribunal directed the appellant to pay the amount of compensation within four weeks to. the Iegal representatives of thei d.eceased/respond.ent herein vide order d.ated 20th April,20L0. It is an admitted position that the legal representatives of the d.eceased/respondent shall receive the amount ordered to be disbursed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, vide order dated 2}th April, 201,0 pursuant to the order permitting withdrawal of the decretal amount deposited before this Court. In the circumstances, the appellant herein to withdraw FAO L61./2002 .d ru T Registry is directed to permit lhe the decretal amount of Rs.2, L6,4601- no steps of the Page 2 of3 \1 xv )ssrn* M d"\F _l i \ 1 l\l\ l\ \\\l \\t\ \ I \ FAO 761/2002 1 \ \ deposited by the appellant herein in compliance of the order of this Court \ dated 20th August, 2010. I With the above directions, the application is disposed of. )-d-rl SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J JULY 19,2OLO d,l,v -.--, ( FreA w liY "\4 l,o fu* Dlru rho-) Page 3 of3