FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. District : Dhule Criminal Application No. 5088 of 2010 (In Criminal Application No. 5087 of 2010) (Shri Dhananjay Vikram More Vs. Shri Arvind Waman Suryawanshi) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATE : 7TH JUNE 2011 1. Heard Mr. Shrikant Patil, learned Counsel for the applicant. 2. None for the respondent although served. 3. This is an application preferred by the original complainant for condonation of delay of 77 days caused in filing accompanying Criminal Application seeking leave to file appeal against the order of acquittal. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders 4. For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily. Moreover, the said delay does not appear to be willful, deliberate or intentional and, therefore, the same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 5. In the result, Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause "b" and delay of 77 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Application for leave to file appeal, stands condoned. Present Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE) JUDGE bgp/ka5088