9tKff i" ??S:MP( SiNIaLt- Vi.i"4M C^r i^^. y ^ IN THE HIGH CORT OF JUDICATURE AT CHHATTISGARhL BILASPUR »u WRIT PETITIOi^O. ^ ^3' /2011 PETITIftNER RESPQMQEl'iTS / The Chhattisgarh uniworth operator Employees Union, Through The Secreatary Shyamu Ram Sen S/o A. Sen, Aged about 42 years, R/0 Ramsager Para, behind Sindhi School, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS ^l) State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary Industriai Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (G.G.) The Labor Commissioner (registrar, Business and Trade) Raipur (C.G.) ..\^:^- ^ ^cf^y' ..••^'t^-"0;..v"' ^ 3) Assistant Labor Commissioner, Raipur (C.G.) .^•yy '<•" csf^ ,<y~ ..^•" ^ 4) The Uniworth India Limited, Sarora, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTrrUTIQN OF INDIA .^ -^ 'vy'~va s v^?r-fr' ^ iis... '^ii^^ •®^E^F^ ^ H10H C01]RT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BII ASPI JR WRTT PETmON CC) No. 735 of2011 PETmONER RESPONDENTS The Chhattisearh Umworth Operator Employees Union, VRRSUS State ofChhattissarh & Others. WRTT PETITION DNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTroN OFINDIA SB: Hon'hle Shri Satish K. Aenihotri, .T. Present: Shri S.C.Verma, Advocateforthepetitioner.. Shri V.V.S.Moorihy, 6epuly Advoyatii General for Ihe Stete/respondent No. 1. Shri Gaulam Bhaduri, Advouale for flie respondenl No. 4. QRnRRIpRAI,) (Passed on 07al day ofSeptember, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner subnrite that the petitiQner does not want to agitate the erievance before tlus Court af Ihis stege. However, the petitioner-Um<Mi may be pemritted to make a represeiitetion to the fiegistrar, Trade Uniaa, to consider their grievance and pass order, after aiFording proper opportiinity ofhearing to all the concemed parties. 2. Shri Moorthy, leamed Deputy Advocato Genaral appearine for the StaWrespondent No. 1 siibnats ttaat if a represaitetion, as aforestated, is ma<fe, Ifae same shall be considered in accordance with law, on its own merits after affording proper opportiuiity of hsaring to all the parties. witfam a period of one moiith from the 3. In view ofthe above, according to leamed coutisel appearing for the petitioner, nofhing survives for adjudication iu ttus petition. 4. Accordingly, the vwit petition is disq Ainit Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge