THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR W.P.No.854 of 2011 ORDER: ( per GM,J) This writ petition is filed by the petitioner questioning the legality and validity of the order dated 16.11.2010 in O.A.No.6690 of 2010 with VMA No.2437 of 2010 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and consequently to set aside the same. It is the case of the petitioner that she is working as Head Master Grade-II in Z.P. Secondary School for Girls at Mulugu, Warangal district from 17.07.2009. While so, the first respondent issued proceedings dated 04.08.2010 transferring her to Z.P. Secondary School, Lebarthy, Vardannapet Mandal, Warangal District on the ground that complaints were received against her from the staff and teachers of the school at Mulugu, and an enquiry was also initated against her. Aggrieved by the same, she filed O.A before the Tribunal. The Tribunal by the impugned order dismissed the O.A. Hence the writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner was transferred in contravention of G.O.Ms.No.15 dated 26.01.2009, which specifically states that no transfers shall be made before public examinations which would cause disruption in teaching and completion of syllabus and revision. He also contended that the first respondent ought not to have transferred the petitioner pending enquiry. Learned counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, contended that due to the disputes between the petitioner and the teachers and the staff of the School at Mulugu and in view of the serious allegations made against her, a preliminary enquiry was ordered and that though the Deputy E.O. Mulugu, tried his level best to sort out the situation, the petitioner did not change her adamant attitude, and therefore, the District administration has opined to transfer her to another school in order to maintain peaceful atmosphere instead of placing her under suspension. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the material available on record. Insofar as the contention of the petitioner that she was transferred in contravention of G.O.Ms.No.15 is concerned, the learned counsel for the respondents has drawn our attention to condition No.8 of the said G.O. which reads as under: “Government may at its discretion prescribe appropriate conditions in the academic interests of the students while promoting and posting of the teachers.” Therefore, it is needless to mention that to avoid unpleasant atmosphere in the school and to see that the school should run properly, the respondents have transferred the petitioner instead of placing her under suspension. When the enquiry proceedings initiated against the petitioner are pending, retaining her at the same station is not just and proper for, the enquiry may not be held in conducive manner. Under the circumstances, we do not find any infirmity or jurisdictional error in the order of the Tribunal warranting interference by this Court. The writ petition is, therefore, liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. GHULAM MOHAMMED,J K.G.SHANKAR,J DATED:24.01.2011 lvl THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR W.P.No.854 of 2011 DT. 24.01.2011