[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION W.P.NO.1105 OF 2006 Shanta Ramchandra Chitalkar ..Petitioner Vs. Mumbai Repair and Reconstruction Board FN/GN Divn.and Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.A.G.Damle Advocate for Petitioner Mr.V.Phal AGP for Respondent ... CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : JUNE 16, 2006 DATE : JUNE 16, 2006 DATE : JUNE 16, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsels for the parties. 2. Considering the averments made in para 5 of the affidavit of Ramesh Mahadev Ladkat, Deputy Engineer it appears that the work except in the premises occupied by the petitioner, is complete. Considering the above, this would not be a fit case to exercise our extra ordinary jurisdiction. Petition is dismissed. We make it clear that we have not decided the matter on merits. [ F.I.REBELLO, J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]