0 /f,^ INTHEmGffCGH^TOECHHATT^SGAimMEillMIPU&^ WRITPEJ'ITIONNO;S^\\3/20(15 PETITI0NERS / i"» 5'-A^./ ^^ 'N^l^^ --'s^"' •'•' .^'^y^ ^^ c^.G^3F RESPONDENTS 1) Ken'alSahu • S/aBisouhaSahu ,-- Agedabout34yeaFS, , Qwner ofBQriagMaciyne /'2) .Dhameshwar Sahu S/o BisouUa Sahu • Aged about30 years ' , , Both arefesident ofvillage- Kssta T' Tehsil--Doiigargoan, Dist-,RajnarKlgdan(G.G) Versus <^- 1) eommissionerEor ; %orkmen'sGompensati6QAct LabourGouFt, Rajnandg6ari(C.G) (-.' /tysf\ ^i/^ '\:A B '?•'? .? ^». ' '• .•—^. 2) BhafluDas : S/oKalluram Sahu ; R/o- village- Kesla, TetiMI-SBongargQan,, Dist- Rajnanag6an(C.O). --^^ ^-»w;'• )t^ 3) ^Smt. Aanju .. / • . , "W/oYashpalAhuja R/o-Near^R'IotQrStaftd Rajnandgoaffi (C.©) WMTPETITIONIINDERARTIELE 226/227 OFM ©©NS^ INDIA FOR ISSUANCB QF A SliI'rABLE WRIT OR0ER OE DISEGTION TO DOJUSTICEEMTHEMA'F'EER. .. • ' ^ DETAILS OF THE PETITION. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As per causetitle.'. , s PARTICULARSOFMEERESEC3NE)ENrFS: As per cause.titte. , • .^' " •. ':, li.u.y.i.B.t jjjji^»qi|intani |}p.;,3£i^}^«i^ ^ '^:} lliakur HIGH COURT 01-' CHHA'mSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. 5419 of2005 FtetitioHers Kewal Saliu & anotfacr Versus Respondents ComnussioncrforWorkmen's Coaipensatioa & otllers SB: Hou'bte Mr. Justtec »attsItK.AgnUiotrl, J SIui H. S. Ahluwalia, Advocateforthc pctitioacrs. Miss Sharmila Singfaai, Advcx'ate for the respondents No. 2and 3. ORDER (ftassed on 14<il<iay ofnccemher, 2006} Thc foUow&gQrder oftfae Court is p^scd by Sattoh K. AgnMiotrI, J. 1. Leamed counsel appearing ibr fhe pe'titioners, oU mstructions, submits that fhe petitioners want to wifhdraw fhis petifen with liberty to fite an appeal, as provided under Sectfon 30 of the Woricmen^ CQmpensatiouAct, 1923. 2. Learaed Goimsel appearing for fhe respondents has no objeGtton to flbe above submMsioa. xnade by teanled couiisel for fhc petitioners. 3. The petitfon is aeeoidu^Iy dismissed &s wifliarEu^ witti flie above stated liberty, No order as to Gosts. Sarish K.Agnaiotri judge