IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:20332 of 1999 Between: 1 K.Satyanarayana, S/o.Kotayya, Hindu, Visakhapatnam Dist, R/o.Upper Sileru. 2 T.Ramana, S/o.Gurayya, Hindu, Visakhapatnam Dist, R/o.Upper Sileru. 3 R.Easwara Rao, S/o.Sanyasasi, Hindu, Visakhapatnam Dist, R/o.Upper Sileru. 4 A.Rama Krishna, S/o.Satyanarayana hindu, Visakhapatnam Dist, R/o.Upper Sileru. 5 J.Raja Babu, S/o.Satyanarayanaraju Hindu, Visakhapatnam Dist, R/o.Upper Sileru. 6 T.Suri Babu, S/o.Ayyappa Hindu, Visakhapatnam Dist, R/o.Upper Sileru. 7 V.Jabannadha Rao, S/o.Satyanarayana, hindu, Visakhapatnam Dist, R/o.Upper Sileru. 8 K.Atchim Naidu, S/o.Appalakonda, hindu, Visakhapatnam Dist, R/o.Upper Sileru. 9 P.Madhava Rao, S/o.Venkata Ramana, hindu, Visakhapatnam Dist, R/o.Upper Sileru. 10 R.Bhaskara Rao, S/o.DurgaRao, Hindu, Visakhapatnam Dist, R/o.Upper Sileru. 11 P.Hanumantha Rao, S/o.Sanyasi , Hindu, Visakhapatnam Dist, R/o.Upper Sileru. 12 B.Jagannadaham, S/o.Suryanarayana, Hindu, Visakhapatnam Dist, R/o.Upper Sileru. 13 G.Satyanarayana Murthy, S/o.Sri Musalayya, Hindu, Visakhapatnam Dist, R/o.Upper Sileru. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Govt.of A.P. rep.by its Prl.Secratary, Home Dept., Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam(Rural Dist) Visakhapatnam 3 A.P.Genco, rep.by its Joint Secretary,Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad 4 The Security Officer, APSEB(Now APGENCO) Upper Sileru-531 105. 5 Divl.Electrcial Engineer (O)L.S.H.E.Schem Upper Sileru. A.P.Genco. Visakhapatnam, .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:MR. Y.N.ANJANEYA CHARYULU FOR MR.K.CHAITANYA The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, Order or direction more fully in the nature of Writ of Mandamus By declaring the action of 3rd respondent in not regularising the service of the petitioners as security Guards though they have completed 7 years of Service as Art.14, 21 of the Constitution of India and Consequential Direction to respondents to regularise the Service of the Petitioners as Security Guards with all Consequential benefits forthwith.” At the hearing, Sri Y.N.Anjaneya Charyulu, learned counsel representing Sri K.Chaitanya, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, WPMP.Nos.9743 and 9744 of 2005 and 25496 of 1999 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 22nd DECEMBER, 2008. kvni