3§NaLE E$§$§§ C61 WW IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.‘syNo. ”5S§’l /2010(s.3.) / Mahendra Prasad Shukla, S/o Shri G.P. Shukla, aged about 49 years, R/o MIG C— PETITIONER Through The Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) of Public 2. Director Instructions, Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Director Raj eev Gandhi Shiksha > Mission Samiti’l“ Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 4. District Education Officer, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As mentioned in the cause title above. @f5%°woiw ‘" 450, Padmanabhpur, Distt. wQgv’f‘ Durg (C.G.) 3%xr Q VERSUS ' RESPONDENTS : 1./ State of Chhattisgarh HKGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION iS: No. 3592 ofZO 10 WRIT PE’I‘ITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF ll-IE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA - SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihog}. Present: O Shri Somkant Vanna, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the State. ORDER gORALL (Passed on 17 day ofFebruary, 201 1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instwctions, submits that this petition has become intiuetuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side does not controvert the above submission. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having j__’__r:‘‘:’:‘—»1 become innumous. ‘ sd/_ ‘ . satish K. Agnihom L Judge Amit ‘ PETITIONER Mahendra Prasad Shulda. VERSUS RESPONDENTS State ofChhattisgarh & Others.