IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.20036 of 2010 MITHILESH KUMAR YADAV, son of Ram Prit Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 19.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 304 (B)/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is the husband of the deceased Rinku Kumari. The informant stated that on 06.02.2010 the accused persons killed his daughter and cremated her dead body. He alleged demand of dowry as well. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the fact is otherwise that the husband of the victim, namely the petitioner, in fact had come only one day before. He further submits that the father of the girl used to give indigenous treatment, as such the petitioner even called him to his house and in his presence the victim, Rinku Kumari, died. The petitioner is in custody since 08.02.2010. Counsel for the informant states that the independent witnesses have supported the prosecution case. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. His prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after four months. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)