1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 784 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.441 OF 2005 Futarmal Kapurji Borana .... Applicant. V/s The State of Maharahstra .....Respondent. ----- Mr. Vineet Jain, advocate i/b Mr. G.R. Sharma, advocate for the applicant. Mrs. A.S. Pai, APP for the State. ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 2nd April, 2008 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. This is an application for bail. The applicant was convicted by 2 the trial court for an offence punishable under sections 396 and 395 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life. The appeal has been admitted and is ready for final hearing. 3. In our view, no case is made out for grant of bail. The appeal, however, is expedited. Liberty is granted to the applicant to apply for bail afresh, if the appeal is not heard within a reasonable period. 4. Application is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.) (S. S. SHINDE, J.)