myii!^: <.-i^sl-BI!'.>h<1.'1!'- •,i-!''''Ii!'s! Ss£SSf ^y^^^^^j. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAKH AT BILA8PUR PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS Writ Petitton (S) No. 6078 of2W)7 1. Smt. Revti Patel W/o Manoj Patel aged about 25 years, R/o village & Post Baramkela, Police Statioa & Tahsil Sarangarh, Distriet Raigarii (CG). 2. Ku. Rajkishori Kujur D/o Fuljens Kujur, Aged about 25 years, R/'o Police Line, Urdana, District Raigarh (CG). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, DKS Bhawan, Raipw, Distt. Raipur (CG). 2. Collector Raigarh District Raigarh (CG). 3. The Chief Executive QfBcer, Janpad Panchayat, Baramkela, Distt Raigarh (CG). fWKTT PETTTION UNDER ARTICU 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Sattsh K. Agidhotri, J.) Present : Shri D.R. Patel, Advocate forthe petitioners. Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, Deputy Advocate General forthe State/respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 18th ofFebruary, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearmg for the petitionea-s submits that after scrutiny of the cases of the appointed caiididates on the post of Sliiksha Karmi Grade III, the petitioners have been se'eeted, thus tliis <i. i- petition has become inlnictuous, to which leamed eounsel appearing for the respondents has no objection. 2. It is ordered aceordingly. 3. Consequently, writ petition is disinissed as having become infhictuous. No order asto costs. Sahu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge