IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30107 of 2009 BHARAT DIXIT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 1.9.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a police case under Section 302/34 of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted that the F.I.R. is against unknown. Co- accused arrested on suspicion has been acquitted in Sessions trial. The Court below proceeds to reject the application of regular bail because his anticipatory bail application was rejected by this Court when the consideration for the two are entirely different. It then talks of “sufficient materials” and “sufficient evidence” of his “complicity” without disclosing the materials in support thereof. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional District & Sessions Judge-II, Gopalganj in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 104/2007 (S. Tr. No. 196/09). P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)