3mm Egmw 0k (’pzl(Oa/ In the Honble High Court of Chhattishgarh at Bi-laspur (C.G.) W.P.No. 41 4%? 2006 Q9) Petitioner ....... xi. .. Smt. Anuradha$inghro£ged 9/ Ch ndrakar 40 years Wife of Shri R.P.Singhrol Lecturer, Government Adarsh Girl’s Higher Secondaly School, Durg, Tahsil & district,Durg. VERSUS 1. The State Government of Chhattishgarh, ThrOugh the Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) g/ 2. The Principal, Government Adarsh Girl’s Higher‘Secondary School, Durg (CG) Writ petition under articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance o_f writ i_n the nature of MANDAMUS. Certiorari, Prohibition and other suitable WRIT or writs. Order or orders, Direction or directions. V w ' 'QQ‘L} W §%\e§‘Ryespondent ... :a'i m... -.. ‘ A HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (s) Na. 4947 of 2006 Pefifioner : SIM. Anumdhu (Singroi) Chandmkar Versus immmw Respondems 51m? Gov-r. of Chha-Hisgarh & o‘fhers singie Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Jus+ice swish K. Agnihe‘m. Shri Ajay Shrivas‘rava, Advoca're for #he Pefi'rioner. Smf. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt Advocaie for fhe responden?s/$fa+e. ORDER (11“ 5¢p+emben 2006) 1. Learned counsel apgearing for ‘I’he pe'ri‘rioner submi‘rs fha'r whik working as Assismn? Teacher, 1he pefi‘tianer has gone on training ta improve his quaHficafions on his own expenses and acquired B. Ed‘ Exomim'rion Cerfifica‘te on 28.7.1989 from P12 Ravishonkor Shuklo Universify, Roipur. 2‘ According 1'0 learned counse! for the pe‘l'i'rioner, 'l'he pe'fi'fioner is en'ri‘rled 'ro fwo advance incremen'rs in view of +he decision of This Cour't' in 'H'ie case of Yashwanf Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporofion, Durg and anoiher {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}. This Cour? in The case of Yoshwanf Kumar Bhnradwnj Vs. Municipa! Corporation, Burg and ono'ther (Supra), came 1’0 'l'he conclusion 'l’hai’ ihe feaohers, who had obiained B. Ed. éw egriiarméww-p wwwww‘ Examinufion Cerfificai'e on his own expenses, are covered by ‘Hne circuhr da'red 24.12.98 (Annexure P/Z) issued by The Sfa'l'e Governmen'f of Mndhyn Pradesh Lznr-ned cnunsel for the petitioner fur-finer submi'rs ‘H'Iaf fhe fads and ques+ion of law inyolved in 'H'Ie presem’ case are squarzly covered by decision of fhis Cour-1' in fhe case of Yashwan'l' Kumar Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipal Corporwion, burg and ano'rher- (Supra), to which learned counse! appearing for fhe respondenfs fairly concedes and agrees wi'i’h fhe avermen‘i' made by learned counsel appearing for 'i'he pe'rifioner. According!y, ‘l'he wrH' pe'fi‘i'ion is allowed in Terms of The order passed in fhe case of Yashwanf Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corpora‘rion, Durg and ano‘rher (Supra), subjecf lo verification of l'he fact as fo’ whe'rher The pe‘l'i'l'ioner has acquired B.“ Ed. Examination Cerfifica+e on his own expenses or not No order as To cosfs‘ Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotr Judge Thakur e—sNM.MW_WMMWAKW i i i