1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO.627 OF 2010 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.870 OF 2004 Laser Advertising Pvt.Ltd. .. Petitioner Versus M/s.Arkom Advertising & Marketing Ltd. .. Respondent and M/s.Arkom Advertising & Marketing Ltd. .. Applicant Mr.A.S.Doctor i/b. Sonal Doshi & Co. for applicant Mr.T.Pandian, O.L. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 28th January 2011. P.C.: . This is a company application for setting aside an exparte order of winding up dated 7th July 2010. 2 It is stated in the affidavit-in-support that the service was effected on another advertising agency and not on the respondent-applicant. 3 There is no affidavit-in-reply. Mr.Bhavesh Parmar had appeared on the earlier occasion. There is a vakalatnama filed on 6th January 2011 by three 2 advocates but none of them are appearing. Mr.Parmar is also absent. There is no affidavit-in-reply dealing with any of the statements made in the affidavit- in-support. In such circumstances, sufficient cause is made out for the absence of the respondent-applicant on the relevant date. The company application is, therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). The applicant will pay costs of the liquidator quantified at Rs.20,000/-. Costs to be paid within two weeks from today. All attachments and coercive proceedings against the respondent-original applicant are quashed and set aside and the Official Liquidator to restore possession of the premises to the respondent- applicant. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)