IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11586 of 2009 1. MOTILAL SINGH 2. Madhusudhan Singh 3. Ramdeo Yadav 4. Naga Mahto Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 29.06.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, learned counsel for the complainant. Purpose may be legal but means was illegal. Complainants themselves were also intending to be beneficiaries otherwise submission is made on behalf of petitioners that misappropriation of Ex-Mukhiya was brought on record by the present Mukhiya and his associates, for that only he set up several persons making the allegation. Learned counsel further submits that no irregularities were found in the list prepared for beneficiaries by the authorities. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 167 of 2008, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Motihari subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)