HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.518 OF 2011 JUDGMENT: Petitioner filed Writ Petition No.5282 of 2009, feeling aggrieved by the denial of continuity of service in the proceedings initiated under the Industrial Disputes Act. The Writ Petition was partly allowed directing that the petitioner shall be entitled to be reinstated into service with continuity of service and attendant benefits, but without back wages. This Contempt Case is filed alleging that the respondents did not extend the benefits as directed by this Court. 2. The respondents filed a counter – affidavit stating that the benefits as directed by this Court were extended through proceedings, dated 04-05-2011. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 4. This Court did not stipulate any particular time for implementation of the order. Vide proceedings, dated 04-05-2011 the benefits were extended to the petitioner. With that, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. 5. The Contempt Case is, accordingly, closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J June 21, 2011. KTL