IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 18695 of 2008 Between: P.R.Reddanna S/o. Late Basi Reddy Visakhapatnam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Deputy Commandant, HPCL, Vizag. 2 The Group Commandant, CISF Group, Head Quarters, Hyderabad (A.P.) 3 The Director General, Central Industrial Security Force Head Quarters, Block No. 13- CGO's Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi - 110 003. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ order or direction, preferably one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, to declare the Impugned Letter No. E-38014/Posting / Adm.-I/008-912, dated 25.08.2008 by transferring the petitioner from CISF Unit , HPCL, Vizag to CISF Unit, ONGC, Nazira which is at North Eastern Sector Assam, against the Circular No. 13/2007 in Proceedings No.E-38011/1/207/Estt. II/3965, dated 08.10.2007, and also the petitioner is suﬀering withMedical problems and also his children's are studying higher education is as illegal, arbitrary and inviolation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue the same place by extending one year as per the said above circular and pass such other or further orders as are necessary. Counsel for the Petitioner:MRC.RAJA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 18695 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner challenges the movement order, dated 25.08.2008. He places reliance upon clause (6) of Circular No.13/2007, dated 08.10.2007, issued by the Directorate General of CISF. The petitioner is working as Constable in the CISF. He was posted in the HPCL Unit of CISF in the year 2004. He was transferred to the unit of CISF at Nazira. He ﬁled W.P.No.10507 of 2007, challenging the same. This Court dismissed the writ petition on 14.08.2008 and consequently, the impugned order was issued. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Once this Court had dismissed the writ petition ﬁled by the petitioner challenging the order of transfer, he cannot be permitted to challenge the consequential order. The petitioner is deemed to have urged all the grounds. Further, he cannot be permitted to plead one after the other grounds in the successive writ petitions. In case, the petitioner has any diﬃculty in working at the place, to which he is transferred, he can certainly make a representation, but after joining that station. In view of the fact that the petitioner continued at the present station, for more than one year, on the basis of the stay order, this Court is not inclined to direct continuance of the petitioner at that station. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to make a representation about his diﬃculties, but only after joining the station at Nazira. As and when it is made, it shall be taken into account and appropriate orders may be passed by the competent authority. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 28.08.2008 JSU ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KSRANI} THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 18695 of 2008 Date: 28.08.2008 JSU