IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 20TH DECEMBER 2010 / 29TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 37677 of 2010(H) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SUMON N.S, NEDIYAKAYIL HOUSE, MANNANAM P.O, KOTTAYAM. BY ADVS. SRI.D.KISHORE, SMT.MINI GOPINATH. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM- 686 001. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOTTAYAM- 686 001 4. THE TAHSILDAR, KOTTAYAM- 686 001. 5. THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, KOTTAYAM- 686 001. 6. VILLAGE OFFICER, ATHIRAMPUZHA- 686 562. 7. THE MANNANAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.3647, MANNANAM P.O, KOTTAYAM -686 561. R1 TO R6 BY GOVT. PLEDER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 37677 of 2010 H ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 20th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Aggrieved by Ext.P4 order of the fifth respondent passed under the Transfer of Registry Rules, petitioner filed Ext.P5 appeal before the second respondent. From Ext.P6, it is seen that the appeal has been forwarded by the second respondent to the third respondent for consideration. Orders have not been passed in the appeal so far. It is complaining of delay in disposal of the appeal, this writ petition is filed. 2. As at present, Ext.P5 appeal is pending consideration before the third respondent, it is for the third respondent to pass orders on the same, with notice to the parties concerned. 3. Therefore, without expressing anything on the merits of the contentions raised, the writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 appeal, with notice to the parties concerned. This W.P.(C) No.37677/10 : 2 : the third respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. 4. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment and writ petition before the third respondent for compliance. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge