<^ ^PWWW'SI^ T^r ';^TRM^, ^t^TTg', {^rraT[< ^.^.^...^...i................^ 2003 311^1 •q^?(^3^r) ^T^T^Tfe^ ^^T^TF^T^RW ^cHW^^i 3T?^l Sinale Bench; Hon'ble ^r. Justice Dhirendra Mishra) W.P(sjNo.74lB/2009 (Petition U/A226 of the (j:onstitution of India) Petitioner Smt. about 41| Middle Khand-E Nehru Wahd Vs Pren^a Masih, W/o Sanjay Masih, Aged years, Upper Division Teacher, Sejhool, Mata Devalay Patpar, Vikas -Bh4tapara, bistt. Raipur- (C.G.)< R/o 1, Bhatapara, bistt. Raipur (C6) -Bh^tap' RESPONDENTS 1 01 State Secreta|'y Mantral< 2. The 06.2.2009 Mr. Deepak Jain, Advocate Mr. Ajay bwivedi, by. Govt. Heard. of Upper Division Teacher ^N^i^r ^m^ ^ fe^ T^R ^T 3:tRR^1^T )f Chhattisgarh, Through, The Department of Educatlon, 14ya, b.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) pirector Public Instruction, Chhattis|garh Government Raipur, bistt. Raipur (<|;.G.) 3. The bi^trict Education Officer, Distt. Raipur ((J;.(5.) |for the petitioner. jAdvocate for the State. The petitioner, who was injtially appointed on the post n the School Education Department of the State eoverhment, is aggrieved by the action of the respondents in ] not adding two advance ^;T<T^ ^1;; H^Tr^^T^Rf:?ilfqF—FS/95—1 1 /2008--1,00,000. T .-:<fe'"^. a^j %^..^" ^ ^^ ^rNr^ra, ^Til^^i^, l^fray -^W^I"^l?S^' •^ 200 -w^r Tpw (^i^^) ^i^l^T^St^ 'cTO^iI^T^qt^ l^nw^fer 3^r ^- increments in her salary evenj Examination at her own expensejs of Assistant Teacher. ^nf^PfrT ^W^f "^ 1^T^ I^^R i73?RRl^T^T though she did her B.Ed. before joining on the post Learned counsel for the Ipetitioner submits that the petitioner's case is squarely covjered by the decision of this in W.P. (s) No.591/2009 betwe^n Preetam Singh Parihar and others Versus The State of Chhat^-isgarh and another decided by this Court and this petition may fcje disposed of in terms of the direction given by this Court in the The above fact has not be^n disputed by learned counsel for the State. In view of above, the instar|t petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents tc increments to the petitioner frorr laforesaid matter. make payment o-f two advance the date of her appointment within a period two months from t4day. However, this order shall be subject to all verifications mad^ by the State regarding facts pleaded in the petition. No order as to costs. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge 5mF3 ^T^TI TT5R?:?Tt^—FS/9S—11/200^—1,00.000. ^c' .V