IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No.4 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Manipal S/o Late Mangey Ram, R/o Tikola Kalan, P.S. Kotwali Manglore, Haridwar ……….Applicant/Complainant Versus Bablu S/o Sadhuram R/o Village Tikola Kalan, P.S. Kotwali Manglore, District Haridwar ……….Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No.401 of 2008, U/s 302/120-B/34 IPC & 3(2)(5) SC/ST Act, P.S. Kotwali Manglore, District Haridwar Dated: May 7, 2010 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. Arvind Vashisth, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Manish Arora, Adv. for the opposite party. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, hearing learned counsel for the parties, perusing the contents of the present bail cancellation application and that of bail application; contents of the counter affidavit; on a careful perusal of the bail order passed by this Court dated 10.4.2009 as well as the role assigned to the respondent that he was shown to have caused injuries to the deceased by ‘Palkati’ and Lathi, whereas as per the post-mortem report, cause of death was shown due to ante- mortem injuries exhorted by firearm and that the present respondent had not caused any firearm injury to the deceased, I do not find any ground to cancel the bail granted to the respondent. Bail cancellation application is rejected accordingly. 7.05.2010 Rajeev Dang (Dharam Veer, J.)