1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.44 OF 2010 Achhelal C. Dubey .. Petitioner versus Girija S. Mishra .. Respondent Mr.Sandesh Patil i/by Prashant P. Jadhav for the petitioner. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 11th January 2010. P.C: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The petitioner is a defendant in a suit filed by the respondent. A document produced by the respondent was admitted in evidence and was marked as an exhibit. An application was made by the petitioner praying for de-exhibiting the said document as the same is not adequately stamped and the same has not been registered. By the impugned order, the said application stands rejected. 2 The relief sought by the petitioner was of de-exhibiting a document which was already exhibited. The order is purely interlocutory in nature which is capable of being challenged in an appeal which may be preferred by the petitioner against the decree passed in the suit. Moreover, the impugned order will not prevent the parties from adducing evidence, if permissible in law, as regards the real nature of the suit transaction. 3 Subject to what is observed above, petition is not entertained and the same is disposed of. (A.S.OKA,J)