IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1261 of 2010 KANHAIYA PRASAD GUPTA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. . ----------- 02. 28.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that there is serious dispute between the petitioner and the informant of Dalsingsarai Police Station Case No. 240 of 2009. It is submitted that even though the informant of the said case committed various cognizable offences but the same has not been taken notice despite giving written information to the respondent no. 6. Learned counsel for the State submits that the prayer of the petitioner is fit to be allowed in the writ jurisdiction of this court. Notwithstanding the rival submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. However, it will be open for the petitioner to take legal recourse if any, available to him under the Code of Criminal Procedure for redressal of his grievances as highlighted in the writ application. The writ application accordingly stands disposed of. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)