THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJU CRIMINAL APPEAL No.802 of 2011 BETWEEEN: The State of A.P. rep. By the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. … Appellant AND 1. Navithapandithula Murali & another. … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL APPEAL No.802 of 2011 JUDGMENT: The lower Court acquitted A1 and A2 of the charge under Section 395 I.P.C. A1 and A2 were arrested more than six months after the offence. There is no identification of A1 and A2 as the culprits who committed the offence, by way of test identification parade after their arrest. What was stated to have been seized by the Police is only ingot and not the stolen article in specie. The alleged confession statement of A1 and A2 said to have given to the police after their arrest is inadmissible evidence. As there is no legal material placed before the Court by the prosecution, the lower Court acquitted A1 and A2. 2. Hence, the Criminal Appeal is dismissed. _____________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J Dated: 08.06.2011 ysk THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJUL CRIMINAL APPEAL No.802 of 2011 DATED: 08.06.2011 ysk