Crl. Rev. No. 2545 of 2009(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- Crl. Rev. No. 2545 of 2009(O&M) Date of decision:- 5.4.2010 Om Parkash ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & Anr. ... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present:- Mr. N.P.Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. A.S.Brar, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Gurdev Singh, J (oral) Crl. Misc. No. 17770-71 of 2010 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl. Rev. No. 2545 of 2009 Heard. This revision petition has been filed by Om Parkash – petitioner, under Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure challenging the order dated 4.9.2009 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Bathinda, vide which he has been summoned as an additional accused to stand trial alongwith other accused under Section 342 IPC. It has been fairly conceded by learned State counsel that no offence under Section 342 IPC is made out from the statements of PW1 and PW2. However, the offences under Sections 447, 427 and 506 are made out against the present petitioner. Crl. Rev. No. 2545 of 2009(O&M) -2- A perusal of the statement of the complainant recorded by the trial Court on 3.9.2009 shows that other offences were committed by the present petitioner. No order has been passed by the trial Court to summon the petitioners for those offences. Accordingly, the order under challenge in the revision is set aside with a direction to the trial Court to pass a fresh order keeping in view the evidence produced before it during the trial. April 5, 2010 (Gurdev Singh) tripti Judge