-3- BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M .A.(C) No. (-^3 /200j0 i .1--/ APPELLANT DEFENDANT N0.3 af,^^-" .^^•^j^^ •shn •rt^"""*' .3^^^ RESPONDENTN0.1 CLAIMANT N0. 1 ;1. IFFCO- TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, through the Branch Manager, Iffco- Tokio General Insurance Co.Ltd, 3rd Floor 345-347, Lalganga Shopping Mal, G.E Road Raipur(CG) VERSUS 1. Smt. Lalita Sahu Widow of late Kamal Narayan Sahu, Aged about 27years. ^- RESPONDENT N0.2 CLAIMANT N0. 2 RESPONDENT N0.3 CLAIMANT N0. 3 RESPONDENT N0.4 CLAIMANT N0. 4 RESPONDENT N0.5 CLAIMANT N0. 5 RESPONDENT N0.6 DEFFENDENT N0. 1 2. Ku.Kruti Sahu, D/o late Kamal Narayan Sahu, Aged about 9 years (Minor) 3. Ku.Nikita Sahu,D/o late Kamal Narayan Sahu, Aged about 7 years (Minor) 4. Vasudev Sahu, S/o late Kamal Narayan Sahu, Aged about 6 years (Minor) 5. Yuvraj ,S/o late Kamal Narayan Sahu, Aged about 4years (Minor) (Respondent no. 2, 3, 4 and 5 are minor, represented through guardian mother - respondent no.1. ) All resident of : Subhash Ward, Bhatapara, Police Station-Bhatapara - District-Raipur(C.G..), Mannu Lal Kashyap , Aged about 38 years, S/0 Ratan Lal Kashyap , Resident — Jarhagaon , District - Bilaspur(C.G.), (Driver of Vehicle having registration NO.C.G.-10-F-6008) RESPONDENT N0.7 DEFFENDENTNO. 2 i,.-.. -4- 4 re. Rajesh Kesharwani , Aged about 40 years, S/0 S.P.Kesharwani, Resident - H 1/7, Narmada Nagar, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Owner of Vehicle having registration No. C.G.-10-F-6008) MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT. 1988 HIGH COURT OP CHHATnSGARH : BILASPXJR M.A.(aNo.83of2009 AppeUant tffco Tokio Geaeral Insurance Compaay Ltd. Versus Respondents Snat. Lalita Sahu & othcrs DB; Hon'bte Mr. I. M. Quddusi, & Hon'bte Mr. Prashaut Kiunar Mishra, JJ. None for the appeBant. None for thc respondents. ORDBRtQtall ( P&ssed on this 14d> day ofMarch, 2011) The Itet is bemg revised. The casc is caUed out agaia, No one is present to press this appeal. Since no one is present for the appeUant, we Iiave no other option except to disxiiiss fhe instant appeal for non-prosecution. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed for want of proseqution. Sd'- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sd/- prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Thnkur k