K/ ^PC^) (.€,^ .$ d3 IN THB MaSaXR, &RA.QBSH STAlJi MMINISTSATIWS IBIBaKAl J'ABAl<?OR_ O.A. BQf.^^Sto? 1992 .aPP^ICABT iVijgy Siagh, soa of J-ete Or. l-ascaan Singb, dged about 46 years, by occupatxon' Assistaa.fc, Sngineer, Departroent. of Water Besources, at pressnt Attsched Officer in the Office of Bxeeutive'Sng.l.Beer, Kelo Project OivJ.sion, Ve.rgus 1. State of Mqpfiya S'radesh tbroagfa e tecratary QeparlaBent of Sater Sesourcei Vallabfa Bfaavan, opal. 2.. Engineer-in-Chief Wat.er Itesources tepar'baeat, Goveismeak of Wadhya Praflesn, Btaopal. 3. Cfai.ef Sngiseer,^)iBEagaaga Basin, itepartl raent of (sTater fissources, 6>eoial. '] 4. superint.ending Sngineer, Upper Bain- ganga Oaa aad ahawar Projec-i; Cirele, Cfe&apara* ths Snquiry Offlcer APPS.c^nog_,gsma^se*nos_A9_ OP .SHS/aDHiHis'cawrvs TBIBUt<AlS,, ACT 1985' W^eSs^a^aSSsK^^^ f 1 f '•i ^s;i:^ ^. u , V! HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Ptetition (S) No. 656 of 2005 Petitioner Vijay Singh Versus Respondents The State of Madhya Pradesh (now Chliattisgarh) & others (Application U/S 19 ofthe Adiiimistrative Tribuuaals Act, 1985f (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agniliotri J.) None for fhe petitioner. Ms Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDBRIorall ( Passed on ttus 14<il day of September, 2009) The inatter is called for hearing twice. On both the occasions noae appears nor aay representatton is niade on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner iiiay not be interested in prosecuting fhe laatter. In view of fhe foregoit^, the petition is disnussed for want of prosecution. Thafcur