IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.764 of 2011 DINESH KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 3. 11.5.2011 The only direction given by this Court in its order dated 30.6.2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No.9896 of 2010 was that the petitioner shall file his claim before the Circle Head, Punjab National Bank, who was to consider and dispose of his claim within three months and if any further amount is found due, the same would also be paid to him within a further period of one month thereafter. In the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party No.2, it is stated that the claim of the petitioner has been disposed of and an amount of Rs.26580/- found payable to the petitioner has also been paid to him. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the claim of the petitioner was for a much larger amount and the opposite party has not considered the same in its true perspective. Be that as it may, this Court has clearly stated in the order under contempt that it was not expressing any view on the merits of the matter. In the said circumstances, the remedy of the petitioner against the action of the opposite parties is elsewhere and not 2 under the contempt jurisdiction of this Court. The contempt application is, accordingly, dismissed. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )