IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.40452 of 2009 MANISH KUMAR YADAV, S/o Late Jagdish Yadav, R/o Patharighat, P.S. Alamganj, Distt. Patna ……….. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ………..…. Opposite Party. ----------- For the Petitioner:- Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate. For the State:- Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. ----------- 2. 26.11.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case registered under Sections 392, 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is not named in the first information report; however, his name has surfaced during the course of investigation. Petitioner has filed supplementary affidavit giving details of criminal cases pending against him. There are five criminal cases other than the present case against the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner has been granted bail in all other cases. Learned counsel for the State submits that there has been recovery of Rs. 4,500/-, one golden chain and mobile phones from the bed of the petitioner. The petitioner is accused in similar nature of criminal cases 2 as would be apparent from the supplementary filed by the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid and the fact that there has been recovery of snatched articles from the petitioner and also the fact that there are five criminal cases against the petitioner registered under Sections 326, 307/34, 399, 402, 414/34, 385, 386/34, 392, 395, 412 I.P.C. & Sections 27, 25(1-B) a, 26/35 of the Arms Act, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This application is dismissed. However, if the petitioner is so advised, he may renew the prayer for bail after six months, if the trial is not concluded within that period. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )