HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22199 of 2011 Date:05.08.2011 Between: Kesina Srilakshmi ..... Petitioner AND Government of A.P., reptd by Its Secretary, Municipal Administration, Hyderabad And three others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri N.V.Anantha Krishna Counsel for Respondent No.1 : AGP for Municipal Administration Counsel for Respondent No.2 : GP for Revenue Counsel for respondent Nos.3 & 4: ------ The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the third respondent in issuing proceedings R.O.C.No.91/2010/GI, dated 29.07.2011, calculating the fine amount considering Rs.12,000/- as the cost of the land per square yard to be the value of the land as fixed by the Registration Department at the time of using the land and building without considering the basic market value register figures at Rs.3,300/- as issued by the Registration Department on 07.04.2010 and 02.07.2011 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently, direct the third respondent to re-work out the fine amount payable considering Rs.3,300/- as the basic market rate as against Rs.12,000/- by setting aside the endorsement given by third respondent in proceedings R.O.C.No.91/2010/GI, dated 29.07.2011.” After arguing the case for some time and noticing the view of the Court, Sri N.V.Anantha Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly stated that his client will pay at the rate of Rs.12,000/- per square yard for regularisation. In view of the said statement, the writ petition is disposed of as no further adjudication thereof is necessary. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.27070 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 05th August, 2011 DR