1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Civil Application No.205 of 2008 In Writ Petition No.5845 of 1999 Shekoba Auto Pvt. Ltd. Applicant Vs. R.K.Shinde & ors. Respondents Mrs.Lataa Desai i/b. Ms.Pallavi Divekar for applicant. Ms.N.D.Buch for resp.nos.1 to 21, 23 to 38 & 40. Mr.Neel Helekar for resp.no.41. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. January 30, 2008 P.C. . Heard Ms.Desai, the learned counsel for the applicant - company and Ms.Buch, the learned counsel for the respondents - workmen. . Writ Petition No.5845 of 1999 was allowed by the learned Single Judge on 3rd March 2006 and the said order was challenged in LPA No.66 of 2006. A 2 Division Bench of this Court vide its judgment and order dated 26/11/2007 was pleased to allow the LPA and the judgment and order of the Single Judge came to be set aside by confirming the judgment and order rendered by the Industrial Court. Consequently Writ Petition No.5845 of 1999 has been dismissed. In the mean while the applicant - company had deposited certain amounts and they were invested in fixed deposits in a nationalised bank. As per the company, the management and the workmen continued their efforts to arrive at an amicable settlement and on 20/12/2007 a bi-partite settlement came to be signed between the parties at Pune. A copy of the said settlement has been annexed to this application at Exhibit "D". As per the terms of the said settlement all the 38 workmen listed in Schedule "A" thereto are covered under it and every one of them shall receive an amount of Rs.1,25,000/- towards their full and final payment of wages and this amount will be over and above the amount already paid by the company while effecting termination of service. In the said settlement it has also been agreed that the workmen gave their consent to the withdrawal of the amount deposited by the company and, therefore, Ms.Buch, the learned counsel states that the application be 3 allowed so that the company will withdraw the money and disburse the same to all the eligible workmen as agreed in the settlement dated 20/12/2007. . Hence the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (B.H.MARL