IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.DENESAN TUESDAY, THE 19TH DECEMBER 2006 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 WP(C).No. 33730 of 2006(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SRI.K.SURESH KUMAR,S/O.K.G.KUCHAN ACHARI OLICKAL HOUSE, MANAKKADU VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER P.K.REGHU RAJAN, S/O.K.S.KRISHNAN ACHARI, PUTIYAVEEDU, CHATTACHAK VILLAGE, RANNI TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.SASI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FISHERIES AND PORTS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, THE KERALA STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE MARINE SURVEYOR OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE MARINE SURVEY, BEYPORE PORT, CALICUT DISTRICT. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 & 3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SHRI. BIJOY CHANDRAN R2 BY SC SHRI. P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.K.DENESAN, J. ----------------------------- WP(C)No. 33730 OF 2006 ----------------------------- Dated this the 19th December, 2006. JUDGMENT Heard counsel for the petitioner, counsel for the second respondent as also Govt. Pleader for respondents 1,3 and 4. 2. Counsel for the second respondent submits that there is merit in the contention of the petitioner that Ext.P11 is a non-speaking order and the same cannot be sustained. Counsel further submits that a fresh order will be passed in accordance with law. 3. In the circumstances Ext.P11 is set aside with liberty to the second respondent to pass fresh orders, if so advised. Needless to state that it shall be speaking order. Writ petition is allowed as above. K.K.DENESAN Judge jj