BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Eighth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. TAMILVANAN CRL OP(MD) No.15657 of 2011 1 ABDUL AZEEZ 2 MEERAN ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 1 AND 2 Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ERVADI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DT CR NO. 247/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. G.THALAIMUTHARASU Advocate For Respondent : MR. K.S. DURAIPANDIAN,ADDITIONAL PUBLIC POROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 2.The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 & A2 facing charges for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) I.P.C. in Crime No.247 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police, have come forward with this application, seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. 3.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that when the de-facto complainant standing near the petitioners' shop, the first petitioner picked up quarrel with the de-facto complainant and attacked him, as a result of which, a case was registered against them. According to him, the petitioners are innocent persons and the case has been foisted against them and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent has not disputed the fact that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioners. He further admits that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital as the injuries are simple in nature. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioners and that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital, I find it just and reasonable to grant anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri and on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed. sd/- 08/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NANGUNERI 2 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ERVADI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DT 1. CC to M/S. G.THALAIMUTHARASU Advocate SR.No.42968: DM::2011:DECEMBER:08:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15657 of 2011 Date :08/12/2011 2P:6C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/