[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1390 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1390 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1390 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1358 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1358 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1358 OF 2006 Raju @ Vijay Deepak Shinde .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent AND AND AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1392 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1392 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1392 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1359 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1359 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1359 OF 2006 Ajaykumar Sunilkumar Sharma .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Shri A.G. Toraskar, Advocate (appointed) for the Applicant/Accused in both Applications. Shri H.J. Dedia, APP, for the Respondent in both Applications. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SRI R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & SRI A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED: DATED: DATED: JANUARY 11, 2008 P.C: P.C: P.C: Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicants and the learned APP. Perused the records. Undisputedly, the applicants were not on bail during the trial and analysis of the evidence on record prima facie discloses clear involvement of the applicants in the offences established by the prosecution in the course of the trial. The applicants have not been able to make [2] out any case for grant of bail during the pendency of the appeal against the impugned judgment and order of conviction and sentence. As we do not find this to be a fit case for grant of bail in the facts and circumstances of the case, the applications for bail are rejected. Liberty to the applicants to move for an early hearing in case the appeal does not reach for hearing by the end of this year. The applications stand disposed of. (A.A. Sayed, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/J8cag1390.6 sjs/J8cag1390.6 sjs/J8cag1390.6