IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3054 of 2011 ISLAM RANGREJ S/O LATE RAM EKBAL RANGREJ R/O MOHALLA BASBITHA, CIRCLE MAJORGANJ P.O. BASBITHA, DIST. SITAMARHI. --- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS COLLECTOR, SITAMARHI 2. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, MAJORGANJ, SITAMARHI 3. THE L.R.D.C. MAJORGANJ, SITAMARHI 4. MUSLIM RANGREJ S/O LATE KAHAI RANGREJ R/O VILL. BASBITHA P.S. BASBITHA, P.S. MAJORGANJ DIST. SITAMARHI. --- RESPONDENTS. For the petitioner : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Siddharth Shankar Pandey, Advocate. ----------- 02 23.02.2011 Heard both sides. While arguing in support of the application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has already filed representation before the respondent Collector, Sitamarhi against illegal issuance of Basgit Purcha in favour of respondent no. 4 (Muslim Rangrej) in regard to 02 decimals of land appertaining to khata no. 555, khesra no. 432, located in village Basbitha, Anchal Majorganj in the District of Sitamarhi and he would be satisfied if the said authority considers and dispose of the said representation/application within a reasonable time. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State, on the other hand, submits that Basgit Purcha was issued in favour of respondent no. 4 sometimes in the year 1982-83. It is submitted that the petitioner could have filed a revision before the competent authority in terms of provision contained under Section 16 of the Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy 2 Act. Be that as it may, since the petitioner has sought permission of the Court to withdraw the application in order to pursue the aforesaid representation, this Court allows the petition to be withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. Application is disposed of. Sym/ ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)