IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.264 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2854 OF 2005 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Ms.Deepa S.Malwankar for the appellant. Mr.M.S.Karnik for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI & CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI & CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATED: 12TH JANUARY, 2006 DATED: 12TH JANUARY, 2006 DATED: 12TH JANUARY, 2006. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The learned single Judge has dismissed the writ petition on the ground that the petition is directed against the concurrent findings of fact. We find no infirmity in the said order warranting interference of this Court. Apart from this though in the title of the petition it is mentioned that the petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the averments and prayers in the petition clearly indicate that it is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, therefore, the letters patent appeal is also not maintainable. Hence the appeal is dismissed. (D.B.Bhosale,J.) (Smt.Ranjana Desai,J.) (D.B.Bhosale,J.) (Smt.Ranjana Desai,J.) (D.B.Bhosale,J.) (Smt.Ranjana Desai,J.)