x;slSl8ii, B ,'""""13 I ^^^/ ~s?i3ssa i-JL 'i^^io? Petstioner i»snuu 'fS t^\ .^i. Smt. Neetu Singh, aged about 31 years, W/o. Sunil Kumar Singh, R/o. S.TJ. Campus, Konj, BHaspur (CG). ^ *hlL f?^ T' .^^ "¥<l^t ^*^. anl'fr'T^ i^Hi^ Versus Sunii Kumar Sinah, S/o. Shi-i M.L. Sinflh, R/o. Niraia Nagar, Bus Stand, Heaf Prajapita Brahma Kumari Ashram, Sitaspur <c.S). u (CG). (Wrlt Pstition under Article 228 of Constitution of ln< l^&tlSe Mr. Satish K. Annlhotri, J. Prs-ssnt; Shn Rshul Birthar©v< GQUHSSI fof th$ ostition^f. (Passed on thls 28 day of September, 2008) E^/S fS 0»/ti ..o ai il^lia.ci.s jvU a!Ni^ tffii-. ^t, Learnea counsei aDDeanna tor tne Detitsoner the extent that the resDondent No.2 mav be dlrscted to disoose of the Case No. 592/2005 (Smt. Neetu S'mah vs. Suni! Kumar Sinah's within a reasonabte psriod. Learned counsel submits that the matter has been pendinc! in the FamiSy Court fbr a long time. 2) in norma! course, no direction can be issued io the court beiow to ciecide the case within ths stipuiated tims. However, in the facts situation of the case, where the provisions of Section 12(5)0fThe Protection of the UU^?yk^rt ^v^>.yv\ f^.f^^v^^iQ:^y^ ^^i-^l^'^y^^^^t .•L^-.i^'i' Q;T^^'^1^t /'^f^'r r^^f^^ ^v^^. ^f^'^' ^f^^iS^^ v'^yji'jsrj iiiysi'i L^oriisiteiLie; vsysSHGS M.SJI.) ^u'w'i? u<2j snui'^i yis rt^i, ^ui/s? provides for disposaj of the application withln a period. of si'Ay days, it is desirable that the Searned Judae hearina the cass shail consider the case of the petiiionsr as expeditiousiy as possibie. 3) For the reasons mentioned hereinabove, this petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge