1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 7309/2010 Ashok Kumar @ Shyalu Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 10.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr SC Gupta - for the petitioner Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is behind bars for the last ten months. He was implicated in the cases one after another. In a case for the offence under section 302 IPC he was falsely implicated thus acquitted. Looking to aforesaid, petitioner may be granted bail. He will not commit same or similar offence during period of bail, if granted. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 2 After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and it is directed that accused-petitioner namely; Ashok Kumar @ Shyalu may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 359/2009 registered in Police Station – Neem Ka Thana, Sikar for offence under Section/s 19/54 Rajasthan Excise Act provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma