1 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 180 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1226 OF 2010 Dr. Tukaram Appayya Shiware ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLCIATION NO. 181 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 823 OF 2010 Smt. Jaya Baban Kadam ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharasthra ... Respondents Mr. S.B. Pujari, Intervener in person in the applications. Mr. P.S. Hingorani, A.P.P. for State in Revision Application No. 512 of 2010 Mr. V. Shekhar, Sr. Counsel with Mr. Samir Vaidya, Advocate for petitioner in W.. No. 823 of 2010. Mr. Dinesh Tiwari, Advocate for Respondent in Revision Application No. 512 of 2010. CORAM : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J. DATED : FEBRUARY 02, 2011 P.C. These applications are filed by the Officer who was at one point of time Investigating into the A.C.B Crime No. 32 of 2002 and ACB 2 Crime No. 28 of 2006 registered with Azad Maidan Police Station. The petitions in which the applications have been filed are relating to what has come to be known as MPSC scam case. There are several petitions and revision applications filed by different persons concerning with this case. Similar applications filed by the Intervener in those proceedings have been allowed. One such order produced before the court is the order dated 19th July, 2010 passed in Criminal Writ Petition No. 3143 of 2009. Considering the contents of the petitions and the contents of the intervention application, it is clear that the intervener is required to be heard in order to arrive at proper decision in the petitions and the revision applications. Hence, the intervener's applications are allowed. The Petitioners are directed to amend the petition to join the intervener as party respondent. Amendment to be carried out on or before Friday, 4th February, 2011. The petitioners are directed to furnish copies of the proceedings to the intervener. [Judge]