CM No.8681-C of 2012 And RSA No. 740 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.8681-C of 2012 And RSA No. 740 of 2010 Date of Decision : July 26, 2012 Smt. Krishna Devi ...... Appellant Versus Banwari Lal and others ...... Respondents **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L.N. MITTAL Present : Mr. Parmod Parmar, Advocate for Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate for the appellant. **** L.N. MITTAL, J (ORAL) CM No.8681-C of 2012 This is an application for impleading legal representatives of respondent No.1/plaintiff-Banwari Lal (since deceased). It is alleged in the application that respondent No.1 has left behind respondents No.2 to 5, 8 and Ramgiri, mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application, as his legal representatives. The application is accompanied by an affidavit. Accordingly, the application is allowed subject to all just exceptions and respondents No.2 to 5, 8 and Ramgiri, are impleaded as legal representatives of respondent No.1-Banwari Lal (since deceased) for the purpose of this appeal. Necessary correction in the memo of parties be made by the office. CM No.8681-C of 2012 And RSA No. 740 of 2010 2 RSA No.740 of 2010 In spite of a very detailed order passed on the preceding date stipulating that no further adjournment shall be granted under any circumstances, counsel for the appellant prays for another adjournment saying that arguing counsel is not well. On the preceding date of hearing also, adjournment was sought on the same ground, although in the order preceding that date of hearing also, it had been stipulated that no further adjournment shall be granted. This appeal was filed on 23.10.2009 i.e. 2 years 9 months ago and even preliminary hearing has not taken place. Earlier also the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution, but was restored on application of the appellant. In the aforesaid circumstances, no justification for further adjournment is made out. Dismissed for non-prosecution. (L.N. MITTAL) JUDGE July 26, 2012 Anand