1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 1181/2011 (Vasant Sadashiv Nimkar VERSUS Hon’ble 4th Jt. Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) & another) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.T. Purohit, counsel for the petitioner. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : MARCH 8 , 2011 . Heard. On hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the plaint pleadings and the proposed amendment along with the impugned order dated 07.01.2011, it appears that the trial Court was perfectly justified in rejecting the amendment application as the trial Court has rightly held that the subsequent developments as were sought to be incorporated in the proposed amendment, were not at all necessary for effectively determining the real questions of controversy between the parties. The trial Court rightly held that if the subsequent developments, which were not necessary for determining the real question in dispute between the parties were allowed to be brought on record, it would be an endless job and there would be no possibility of the suit to be concluded or decided. On perusal of the proposed amendment, this Court finds that the petitioner intended to plead the facts, which he could have as well tendered in his evidence as it is a well settled proposition of law that a party should plead only 2 the necessary facts and it is not necessary to state the evidence on which the facts need to be proved, in the pleadings. Merely because the petitioner was permitted to amend the written statement in a connected suit and was permitted to bring similar facts on record, it cannot be said that the trial Court committed an error in this case in rejecting the amendment application. Since the petition is devoid of merit, the same is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE APTE