IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-23975 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:09.08.2011 Nasim (minor) through Munna . . .Petitioner Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Rajesh Lamba, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This is a petition for pre-arrest bail in a case registered vide FIR No.223 dated 18.6.2011 under Sections 279, 336, 307 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) read with Section 3(2) of the Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act, 1984 at Police Station City Palwal, District Palwal. The allegation against the petitioner is that barricade was erected in order to check overloaded vehicles. The petitioner while driving the offending vehicle (truck) came in a fast and negligent manner. The ASI, along with other employees gave a signal by lighting the torch to stop the truck but the petitioner increased the speed and tried to overrun the Constable standing near the barricade. Luckily, the Constable was thrown at a distance and the petitioner ran away from the spot after stopping the truck at some distance. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a juvenile and has been falsely implicated but at the same time it is admitted that the petitioner is the driver of truck bearing No.RJ-2-GA-2363 which is involved in this case. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case as per which the petitioner had tried to run-over a Constable on duty, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) AUGUST 09, 2011 JUDGE Vivek