J“Mam. mm IN THE m7” HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURGD " l ‘ [CHHATTISGARHI WRIT PETITION {S} No. %t / 2. District Education Officer, Rajgarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. a. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. _ [I J WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE N CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER: / Hukum Das Mahant, son of Heeraman Das, aged about 58 58 working as Head Master Primary School, Baradoli, Block Pussour, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. versus Resgondegts versus / 1. State ofVChhattisgarh, Through Secretary School Edocation Department D K S Bhawan HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1812 of2011 Hukum Das Mahant. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri C.J.K.Rao, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Government Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL V (Passed on 04 day of April, 201 1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation in the light of circular dated 05.01.2011 issued by the Govemment of Chhattisgarh, School Education Department. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. No permission of this Court is required to make representation to the respondent authorities. Thus, such direction cannot be issued. However, if the petitioners make a representation to the respondent authorities, the same may be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits and perspective. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- SATISH K. ANGNIHORI Judge Amit