IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 13TH JANUARY 2009 / 23RD POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 36201 of 2008(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.V.GEETHA, D/O. KUNHAPPA,AGED 40 YEARS, SENIOR ACCOUTANT (UNDER SUSPENSION),PAZHAYANGADI URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,RESIDING AT ERIPURAM, PAZHAYANGADI R.S.POST, KANNUR -670358,KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.T.MADHAVANUNNI SRI.V.A.SATHEESH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. M.P.UNNIKRISHNAN, CHAIRMAN, PAZHYANGADI URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,PAZHAYANGADI R.S.POST KANNUR -670358,KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. THE PAZHYANGADI URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,NO.C-975,PAZHAYANGADI R.S.POST, KANNUR 670358,KANNUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SECRETARY, PAZHYANGADI URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., PAZHAYANGADI R.S.POST KANNUR 670358,KANNUR DISTRICT. 4. THE JOINT REGISTRAR,CO-OPERATIVE SECTION CIVIL STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE' SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM GEORGE JACOB FOR R1-3 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BEJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF PETITION DT 3.12.2008 TO R1. P2 COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD DT 4.12.08. P3 COPY OF COURIER CONSIGNMENT NOTE DT 3.12.2008 TO R4. P4 COPY OF SUSPENSION ORDER DT 4.12.08. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: R3(A) COPY OF RELEVANT PAGES OF THE MINUTES BOOK. R3(B) COPY OF LETTER DETAILING THE DUTIES OF THE INTERNAL AUDITOR. R3(C) COPY OF LETTER DT 17.9.08. R3(D) COPY OF SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DT 3.12.08. R3(E) COPY OF EXTRACT OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING DT 3.12.08. R3(F) COPY OF MINUTES OF THE MEETING SIGNED BY THE PETITIONER. R3(G) COPY OF EXTRACT OF THE ACQUITTANCE REGISTER FOR NOVEMBER. // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE K.M. JOSEPH, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 36201 OF 2008 I ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 13th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner challenges an order of suspension. She is working as Senior Accountant. According to her, the order of suspension would not show any basis for the suspension. Counter affidavit is filed. According to the allegations in the counter affidavit, it may not be correct to say that there are no allegations as such. I would not think it is necessary in the interest of justice to interfere with the order of suspension. But, I feel at the same time the enquiry should be concluded at the earliest. 2. I heard both sides. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents 1 to 3 submits that the enquiry can be concluded within two months from today. I record the submission. Writ petition is disposed of directing that the enquiry against the petitioner will be concluded, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from today. Sd/- (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) aks // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE