WP(C) 5872/2007 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. N. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Pathak, learned CGSC. I have also heard Mr. D. Talukdar, learned counsel fo r the respondent No. 4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that a se ttlement has been arrived at by and between the parties. In this connection, lea rned counsel for the petitioner has filed an additional affidavit on 11.10.2010. The respondent No. 4 has not disputed the contentions raised in the said affida vit. In view of the above, I dispose of the writ petition in terms of the stand taken in the additional affidavit. Consequently, the impugned order dated 10.10.2007 passed by the Controlling Authority under Payment of Gratuity Act & Assistant Labour Commissio ner (Central) Guwahati in file No. 48(01)/2007-G/A impugned in this writ petitio n shall not be given effect to in view of the settlement arrived at by and betwe en the parties.