HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT – NAINITAL. Writ Petition No. 3165 (S/S) 2001 1. U.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. Vipin Khand, Gomti Garar, Lucknow, Through it sMananging Director, 2. Doiwala Sugar Company Ltd. Doiwala, Dehradun. ……..Petitioners. Vs. 1. M.R. Saklani, S/o Sri Parmanand Saklani, R/o Sugar Mill Colony, Doiwala, Dehradun, 2. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Dehradun. ………Respondents. Sri U.K. Uniyal, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri M.C. Pant Ad. for the respondent no.1 Sri Manoj Tewari, learned Counsel for the petitioners. Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri U.K. Uniyal, learned Senior counsel assisted by Sri M.C. Pant, Advocate for the respondent no.1 and Sri Manoj Tewari, learned Counsel for the petitioners. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 22.03.2001 passed by respondent no.2, further with a prayer to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus restraining the respondents form interfering and harassing the petitioners by way of implementation and execution of the order dated 22.03.2001. During arguments learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the question raised in the writ petition are squarely covered by the judgment dated 17.02.2003 passed by the Division Bench of Allahabad High Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 36289 of 1995 Raj Deo Verma vs. The U.P. State Sugar Corporation Limited through its Managing Director and another. Accordingly, the present writ petition is decided in the same terms and observations made by the Division Bench of Allahabad High Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition no. 36289 of 1995 Raj Deo Verma vs. The U.P. State Sugar Corporation Limited through its Managing Director and another decided on 17.02.2003. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) July 20, 2004: NCM: