IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO.434 OF 1998. (NAMDEO SONAJI DAROLI...VS... NAMDEO VITHOBA KHARODKAR.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. J.J.Chandurkar, Advocate for Appellant. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATED : AUGUST 31, 2010. It appears that in this case the sole appellant Namdeo had expired during pendency of the second appeal. The time was granted on more than a couple of occasions to the learned counsel for the appellant to take requisite steps in the matter. Mr. J.J. Chandurkar, learned counsel for the appellant states that the legal representatives of the appellant are not responding in spite of issuance of various communications on the address at which the original appellant resided. In such circumstances, the second appeal cannot be prosecuted any further. The same is dismissed for want of prosecution. JUDGE RR.