w& %?/°® HIGH COURT OF Ci‘iHATTlSGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH i CORAI’VI: HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA. C J & I-ION’BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR S'INI-IAI, J. g Writ A Deal {FRI No.2a77 of 2mm Preseni : Writ Aggea! Under Seciion 2m of the Chhattisgarh High Court Aggeai to Givision Bench Act; 2006 Read with Ruie 157 (1m IEI oi the High Court of Chhattisgarh Ruies, 20% H . Shri P Diwakar, learned Senior Advocate with Shri Adi! Minhaz & Shri Adiraj Surana, learned counsei for the appeiiani. Shri raveen Das, Depuiy Government Advocate for the State / respondents. JUDGMENT ‘mr we oath Aprii, 2o08) The fottowing Judgment of the Court was paseed by Rageev Gapta, C.J. Learned ceunse! for the parties are heard on admission. P APPELLIQN‘T §PETITIONER : Somendra Pratap Singh, Slo Shri Murlidhar Singh, Aged abcui years, Laboratezy Technician , Gavernmem Giris Coilege: ‘5 . Ami‘ikapur, DistE. Surgu}a (QC-E.) Versu$ RESPONDENTg‘E 1. Skate of Chhattisgarh -— through the Secretary, Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur ((3.3) 2. The Additionai Director, Higher Educatiori‘,’ Biiaspur Division, Biiaepur (C.G.) 3L The Principai, GovernmentrGiris Coiiege, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (0G) 2) Appeuant — Somendra Pratap Singh has led this writ avnpeal again$t order dated 26.62.2008 in W? (S) No.13a7/2005, whereby the appeuant’s writ petiiian seeking writ of mandamus to the respondents for reguiarization of his service was dismissed. 1 3) ln View of the dictum of the Apex Court in the matter of Secmtag, State of Karnataka & others Vs Umadevi and others reported in 2&96 AER SCW 19M, a daily wage empioyee cannot ciaim reguiarization as of right and no writof mandamus can be issued in that b‘ehaif. 4) We, therefore, do not find any infirmity in the impugned order, which may warrant interference in this writ appeai. 5) The writ appeai, therefore; is iiabie to be dismissed 1 t and is hereby dismissed summariiy. / W sdl- " g SW‘ sanmg Sun“ Kumar Chief Justice Jud/gi//