IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19425 of 2009 GUDDU PARDHAN,son of Sri Amarnath Gupta, resident of village-Ratwara,P.S.-Sadar, District-Muzaffarpur. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 10-07-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that though FIR was lodged for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 448, 379, 386 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code but charge sheet has been submitted for the offence under Sections 341, 323 and 504/34 of the Penal Code. Petitioner was allowed bail by the police but cognizance has been taken for the offence under Section 379 of the Penal Code also, which is only a super added allegation and again petitioner is apprehending his arrest. In the case some altercation took place in between the parties on account of quarrel among the children, who are neighbours. Considering the materials on record, petitioner was allowed bail by the police which has not been misused. So, the above named petitioner is allowed to continue on the same bail in Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S.Case No.12 of 2009, pending in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur. Accordingly, this petition for anticipatory bail is disposed of. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )