IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22002 of 2011 Ashok Kumar, son of Saudagar Pandit, resident of village – Jay Prakash Nagar Hisua, P.S. – Hisua, District – Nawada. ------- Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party ****** For the petitioner : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Adv. For the Informant : Mr. Shankar Kumar, Adv. For the State : Ms. Asha Devi, APP ****** 02. 01.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 855/2010 for the offences under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada. The petitioner is named accused in this Complaint Case being husband of the complainant carries allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. He appears already filed Matrimonial Suit No. 93/2010, before Family Court, Nawada, under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking dissolution of marriage and decree of divorce. In spite of the above he intends to resume and continue matrimonial relationship with the complainant who is one and only wife. In order to further strengthen 2 he offers to pay a sum of Rs. 500/- per month by way of ad interim maintenance to the complainant subject to any order by the competent on the point. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of filing an application before the court below stating such intention including offer of payment, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Complaint Case No. 855/2010, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend both the courts regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)