IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2496 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision 18.01.2011 Dal Singh ...... Petitioner VERSUS Harikesh and others ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Anil Malik, Advocate, with Mr.Ramandeep, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Surinder Dhull, Advocate, for respondent Nos.1 and 2. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J: The petitioner has invoked the powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India while praying for setting aside the order dated 16.03.2010, passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kaithal, dismissing his application Under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. for impleading him as party- defendant. Vide impugned order dated 16.03.2010, the trial Court has dismissed the application of the petitioner for impleading him as party- defendant to contest the suit, filed by the plaintiffs-respondents No.1 & 2. Admittedly, the land is owned by the Gram Panchayat-respondent No.3 and it, being defendant No.1 in the suit, is duly protecting its rights. No relief has been claimed by the plaintiffs against the petitioner, therefore, he certainly cannot be said to be the necessary party to the suit so as to be impleaded as defendant. In view of the matter, the present petition is dismissed. However, in case the rights of the petitioner are infringed in the suit land, he may have recourse to the remedy as provided under law. The orders dated 08.04.2005, passed by Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Kaithal, 28.11.2005, passed by Collector, Kaithal and 25.04.2007, passed by Commissioner Ambala Division, Ambala, as ordered in favour of the petitioner, would remain effective till the same are set aside or cancelled without hearing the petitioner. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 18.01.2011 mamta-II