IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14858 of 2011 Dharmendra Kumar, S/O-Late Suraj Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03 28.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Although, petitioner is not named in the first information report but in course of investigation petitioner was arrested and he was put on Test Identification Parade and it is stated that he was identified in Test Identification Parade by the informant of this case. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the informant had some grudge against co-accused Mumtaz Akhtar, who allegedly, hired the criminals to commit the alleged crime and admittedly, the aforesaid co-accused Mumtaz Akhtar has already been granted privilege of bail by another Bench of this Court. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 521 of 2011 arising out of Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 38 of 2010, stands rejected. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)