1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR 1. S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.3419/2010 Nemi Chand Vs. State 2. S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.3828/2010 Sanjay Singh Vs. State Date of order : 20/5/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Manish Gupta for the petitioners. Shri Amit Punia, P.P. for the State. ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor for the State, learned counsel for complainant and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that in all these cases the accused petitioners are alleged to have committed offence under Section 412 IPC. The main allegation of looting the truck is against the other accused. The petitioner Sanjay Singh was arrested on 14.3.2010 and other two co-accused were arrested on 22.3.2010. On the same day, they were also made accused in another case no.606/2009. On the same day, their arrest was shown in FIR No.668/09. The sole allegation against them is that they purchased certain liquor which was looted from the truck. Challan has been filed and trial of the case is likely to take long time. Petitioners are in jail for quite some time. There is no other criminal case against any of them, except the above two cases. 2 Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for complainant have opposed the bail application. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail. In the result, this bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Nemi Chand S/o Babu Lal & (2) Sanjay Singh S/o Vikram Singh shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No.606/09, P.S. Behror, District Alwar, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for their appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. However, in case the petitioners are found indulged in similar offence at any point of time, the prosecution would be at liberty to apply for cancellation of their bail before the Court of Sessions itself and the bail would be liable to be cancelled on this ground alone. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/