IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 6505 of 2005 Between: 1. Smt. Bommati Kanaka Laxmi, w/o. Late Laxminarayana, R/o H.No. 5-4-87, Kothuru , Hanamkonda, Warangal District. 2. Bommati Ravi Shankar, S/o. Late Laxminarayana, R/o.Kothuru , Hanamkonda, Warangal District. 3. Bommati Raju, S/o Late Laxminarayana, R/o.Kothuru , Hanamkonda, Warangal District. 4. Seetha Mallesham, S/o. Bondaiah, R/o.H.No.2-1-225, Kothur , Hanamkonda, Warangal District. 5. Kaniganti Prabhakar, S/o. Lasumaiah, R/o. H.No. 5-11-1015, Pochammakunta, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. 6. Donikena Sarojana, W/o. Devender, R/o. H.No. 5-11-963/2, Pochammakunta, Sagara Colony, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. 7. Syed Mubeen Ahmed, S/o. Syed Ameen, R/o. 1-9-581, Police Colony, Julywada, Subedari, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. 8. Yezdhani Begum, w/o. Md. Nizamuddin Ansari, R/o.Lashkar Bazar, Pochammakunta, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. 9. Gatla Padma, W/o. Late Prabhakar, R/o. H.No. 5-11-83, Naim Nagar, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. 10. Smt. Talla Swapna, W/o. Talla Raju, R/o.H.No. 5-11-83, Naim Nagar, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. 11. Rais Fatima, W/o. Aslam Pasha, R/o.H.No. 1-9-581, Policy Colony, Julywada, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. 12. Eashwaramma, W/o. Sammaiah, 13. Chirra Sanjeev Goud, S/o. Jagannadham, R/o.Damera Village, Athmakur Mandal, Warangal District. 14. Bolla Bhagyalaxmi, W/o. Ashok, R/o. H.No. 5-4-87, Kothur, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. 15. M. Laxmipathi, S/o. Ramachandram, R/o.Electricity Colony, Subedari, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. 16. Gunti Srinivas, S/o. Komuraiah, R/o. Ganesh Nagar, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District. 17. Sankilla Shobharani, W/o. Ashok, R/o H.No. 5-3-60, Kothur, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. 18. Gandla Devender, S/o.Rajaiah, R/o.H.No. 5-11-1290/A, Hanuman Nagar, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Joint Sub Registrar, Warangal. 2 The District Collector, Warangal District at Warangal. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the impugned action of the 1st respondent in not receiving and registering the documents executed by the petitioners 1 to 3 herein in respect of the lands in Sy.No. 87 at Lashkarsingaram Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District, in favour of the petitioners 2 to 18 as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to law and violative of the provisions of Registration Act and violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India besides principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 1st respondent herein to receive the documents executed by the 1st petitioner in favour of petitioners Nos. 2, 3, 14 and 18, 9 and 10 and the sale deeds executed by the petitioners No.2 and 3 in favour of petitioners Nos. 4 to 8, 11 to 13, 15 , 16 and 18 and register the same in accordance with law. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.Y.RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR REVENUE The Court at the stage of admission made the following : O R D E R : This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the impugned action of the first respondent in not receiving and registering the documents executed by the petitioners 1 to 3 in respect of the lands in Survey No.87 at Lashkarsingaram village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal district, in favour of the petitioners 2 to 18 as arbitrary and illegal. When the matter is taken up for consideration, it is represented by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that Writ Petition No.6806 of 2004, in which an identical question was raised in respect of the land in the same Survey Number 87 of Lashkarsingaram village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District, was disposed of by this Court with a direction to the respondent therein to receive the documents for the purpose of registration and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. This Court while disposing of the said writ petition followed the ratio laid down in Mandadi Nirmala and another v. District Collector, Hyderabad and others. The learned Government Pleader for Revenue does not dispute the ratio laid down in the above decision. Accordingly, following the above said decision, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to receive the documents executed by the petitioners 1 to 3 in favour of the petitioners 2 to 18 as and when presented for the purpose of registration and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. No order as to costs. ______________ G.ROHINI, J. Dated: 5th April, 2005. CS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Joint Sub Registrar, Warangal. 2. The District Collector, Warangal District at Warangal. 3. Two C.Cs.to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (O.U.T.) 4. Two C.D. copies. Form-NIC-OGS/WP{AVLR}