IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2011 / 11TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 14703 of 2011(S) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: ---------------- 1. J.JAYAKUMAR,S/O.JANARDHANAN NAIR, AGED 39 YEARS,NAMPOOZHIYIL HOUSE, NARIAMPARA PO,KATTAPPANA. 2. MANOJ,SOBHANA VILASOM, KUNTHALAMPARA,KATTAPPANA. BY ADV. SRI.A.C.DEVASIA RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. KATTAPPANA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, GRAMA PANCHAYATH OFFICE,KATTAPPANA,REP.BY ITS SECRETARY,KATTAPPANA VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 554. 2. THE PRESIDENT,KATTAPPANA GRAMA PANCHAYATH,GRAMA PANCHAYATH OFFICE,KATTAPPANA, KATTAPPANA VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 554. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PYNAVU , KUYILUMALA, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 690 501. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTAPPANA - 685 508. BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. BENNY GERVACIS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.Chelameswar, C.J. & Antony Dominic, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 14703 OF 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 1st day of June, 2011 JUDGMENT Antony Dominic, J. The petitioners have approached this Court styling themselves as Public Interest Litigants and seeking a direction to the respondents not to implement the newly proposed traffic system, which envisages entry of buses into the new bus stand, without the buses entering into the old bus stand. There is a further prayer to direct the respondents to complete the bypass road connecting the old bus stand with the new bus stand before inaugurating the newly constructed bus stand. Further reliefs are also sought for. 2. The case of the petitioner is that pursuant to Ext.P1 agreement between the Panchayat and the private parties thereto, land was surrendered by the private parties for the construction of the new bus stand. The agreement also provided for the construction of roads linking the new WP(C) No. 14703 of 2011 -:2:- bus stand with the old bus stand. According to the petitioners, the idea was that once the new bus stand is constructed and the work of the road is completed, buses will enter both the bus stands. It is stated that contrary to the above, with the new traffic system coming into force with effect from 01.06.2011, the buses will enter only the new bus stand. This arrangement, according to the petitioners, is intended for the benefit of the real-estate developers who have constructed several buildings near the new bus stand. 3. First of all, the petitioners are not parties to Ext.P1 agreement. If at all, if there is violation of the terms of the said agreement, the enforcement of the agreement can be sought only by the parties to the said agreement. Even otherwise, whether a bus stand is to be operated, roads to be laid and what traffic system is to be adopted are matters for the administrators to decide. Such issues are outside the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India especially in a writ petition of this nature filed with WP(C) No. 14703 of 2011 -:3:- vague and unsubstantiated allegations. We are not satisfied that this is a case warranting interference. The Writ Petition fails and it is accordingly dismissed. J.Chelameswar, Chief Justice. Antony Dominic, Judge. ttb