IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 5534 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 5534 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 5534 OF 2007 Lata Suresh Chate .... Petitioner versus Dattatray Laxman Pingat & ors...... Respondent. Mr. Milind Deshmukh for the petitioner. Mr. U.B.Nighot for the respondent no.1. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 01ST AUGUST, 2007 DATED; 01ST AUGUST, 2007 DATED; 01ST AUGUST, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The petitioner is the original plaintiff whereas the respondent is defendant. The plaintiff has filed a suit for perpetual injunction and also moved an application for temporary injunction. The respondent as well claimed injunction against the plaintiff by making a counter claim. The application moved by the defendant for temporary injunction has been allowed by the trial court. With a view to execute the order the respondent/defendant has moved the trial court for grant of police aid and grant of the said application has prompted the petitioner to file the instant writ petition. The petitioner has not challenged the order dated 8-6-2007. Hence his objection for grant of police aid has been held to be ill-founded. 2. Perused the order impugned in this petition. No interference is called for. The petition thus deserves to be dismissed summarily and I order accordingly. ...