Crl. Misc No. M 21102 OF 2011 ****** Sat Narain vs State of Haryana and another Present : Mr. J.S.Bedi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmohan Sikka, DAG Haryana for respondent No.1. ******* The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in criminal complaint No.269, dated 4.4.2007, filed under Sections 420, 467, 468, 506, 120-B of the IPC, pending before the Court of JMIC, Bhiwani. On 22.7.2011, the following contention was noticed :- “ Learned counsel has argued that the allegation against the petitioner is that he had sold land with regard to which there was a status quo order. Had this complaint been filed by the purchaser, allegations of fraud may have been maintainable but in the mouth of the contesting party in the civil dispute only a petition under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC would lie.” Counsel for the respondent has very fairly stated that this would indeed be the position in law. In the circumstances, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Consequently, in the event of his appearance before the learned trial Court on the date fixed, the petitioner shall be released on anticipatory bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) August 04, 2011. JUDGE `kk'