IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8609 of 2009 PURUSHOTTAM YADAV, S/o Sri Sobhit Lal Yadav Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 10.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner may have no concern with the money paid to the informant through Cheque. So, petitioner’s arrest cannot be justified. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Marauna P.S. Case No. 86 of 2008 and G.R. no. 1200 of 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Supaul, Dist. Supaul subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)