IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1551 of 2009 HEMANT KUMAR RAI, son of Dr. Shukdeo Rai, resident of vill.- Goriyaro Chowk, Ward no.13, P.S.-Forbesganj, Distt.-Araria ----------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR . 2. 27.10.2009 Heard the parties. Judgment is passed on 23.1.2009. Admittedly, this revision petition should be filed till 23.4.2009, thereafter limitation started to run and revision petition is filed only on 10.9.2009. It is pertinent to mention here in the case that F.I.R. was lodged by the father of the victim. The single ground for condoning the delay as given that the victim girl was admitted to a Hostel in Nepal in connection with her studies in matriculation. She passed matriculation in the month of July. Thereafter, there was consultation in the family and a decision came up to file the revision petition but petitioner failed to acknowledge that after examination students used to leave their Hostel rather there remains no provision for their stay in the Hostel. So it is not possible that result was declared in the month of July and petitioner’s daughter was allowed to live in her hostel after examination. Moreover, admission of the daughter of the informant is not corroborated by any document. So, I find no force in the explanation given by the petitioner. As such, this limitation petition is dismissed. Accordingly, the revision petition is also dismissed finding the case time barred. sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )