IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL. A.O. No. 186 of 2008 Smt. Sunita W/o Sri Sunil Kumar, D/o Sri Mohan Lal Sahai, R/o Pushpa Kutir, Spring View Estate, Tehri Bye Pass Road, Mussoorie, District Dehradun. ----Appellant. Vs. Sri Sunil Kumar S/o Sri Mangal Singh, R/o Purv Madhyamik Vidhyalaya, Aleru Thuldhar, Tehri Garhwal. ----Respondent Coram: Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Dated June 2, 2008: Per Coram:- Heard Sri A. Rab, learned counsel for the appellant and perused the impugned order dated 02.04.2008 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Dehradun in Misc. Case no. 119 of 2007. Admittedly, the appellant obtained decree of divorce and no appeal was preferred by her against the dismissal of her application u/s 24 of Hindu Marriage Act . There is no question of maintainability of application moved under Order IX Rule-9 of the Code of Civil Procedure by the petitioner (present appellant) for restoration of the case of divorce and petition u/s 24 of Hindu Marriage Act. We do not find any error committed by the Trial Court, who has dismissed the application filed under Order IX Rule-9 of C.P.C. and the application for restoration of the suit, as not maintainable. The appeal is dismissed in limine. (interim application no. 2500/08 also stands rejected) (Dharam Veer, J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 02.06.2008 NCM