IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42762 of 2010 ANIL MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----- 02. 05.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. In the incident informant’s brother is shot dead. Petitioner has not been named in the F.I.R. Submission of the learned counsel for petitioner is about appearance of petitioner’s name in course of investigation only and another F. I. R. by one Dev Sharan Singh showing a different manner of killing. What is the reason or interest of police officials for registering two cases for the same incident, but in instant case in course of investigation, petitioner has been shown assailant of the deceased by an eye witness corroborated by other witnesses as observed by the learned Sessions Judge. Informant of the case is deceased’s brother not an eye witness. Accordingly, petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail stands rejected. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)