IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.289 of 2011 Bimal Kumar Kumud Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ----------- 3. 28.6.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though he has given information to the O.P. Incharge-cum-Sub-Inspector of Police, Baranti O.P. under Rajapar Police Station, in the district of Vaishali (respondents no.4) and Shri Sudhir Kumar, Sub-Inspector of Police, Baranti O.P. under Rajapakar Police Station in the District of Vaishali (respondent no.5) with respect to the alleged theft of articles at the hands of the persons named in the written application, neither first information report has been lodged nor any action has been taken against the accused persons. Considering the submissions of the parties, this Court is of the view that in case respondents no.4 and 5 are not taking any action, it will be open for the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the concerned Superintendent of Police and at the same time, it will be open for him to take recourse to law by filing a complaint before the Magistrate. The writ application stands disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)