1 A 3165.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3165 OF 2010 Vinod B.Gupta ..Applicant. versus Chief Conservator of Forest & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.Indrajeet Kulkarni for the applicant. Mr.J.P.Kharge APP for State. CORAM : V.M.KANADE, J. DATED : JULY 26, 2010. P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the Incharge District Judge-1, Additional Sessions Judge, Thane who was pleased to dismiss the appeal filed by the applicant herein for want of prosecution for not removing the office objection. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has filed xerox copy of the impugned order since certified copy was not issued and he was unable to file the said copy in the District Court. In my view the Sessions Court ought to have given an opportunity to the applicant to produce the certified copy. The applicant has 2 A 3165.10 already filed xerox copy of the impugned order and since the certified copy was not available he was unable to comply with the office objection. 3. The impugned order, therefore, is set aside. The appeal filed by the applicant in the District Court is restored to file. Respondent no.1 is directed to supply the certified copy to the applicant within four weeks. The application is allowed and disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (V.M.KANADE, J.)