-1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL No. 492 OF 2006 ______________________________________________ Office Ntes, Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s appeaances, Court’s : order orders or directions : and Registrar’s : orders : ______________________________________________ Mr. Amit B. Borkar , advocate for the appellants. Mr. P. D. Dalvi , Advocate for respondents . CORAM : S. J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : AUGUST 28, 2007. PC . The second appeal raises no question of law. The appellant has challenged the sale deed, executed by his father on 27th November 1998 in favour of the defendant. 2. The challenge to the sale deed is on the grund that the signature on the stamp and on the sale deed differ, and that -2 - the appellant’s father was hospitalized for paralysis, one month prior to execution of sale deed, and on the ground there was some inconsistensy about when the consideration was paid. 3. These are purely questions of fact. Both the Courts below have on an analysis of evidence, held against the appellant. There is no warrant to interfere with these questions of fact. The learned Judges have also noted that the pleas were vague and adequate evidence was not led by the plaintiff/appellant. In the circumstances, no question of law arises. The second appeal is dismissed.