\^.-<y.- %w^ ^.y€^^3^ -o'..••" c ?<iC .5'if^ ?. R^ RS73'??*.^^?. y «i';^iu3n ^£lLuti -2 ^3 .c^' ..-.-•>.'.^1'' ,t' ./••• [N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH ATBII.ASPUR W.P.NO. f£^f / 2006 Petitioner / Bhoj Raj Dewangan, Aged about 23vears, S/o Late Shri Ram Chand Dev/angan, Resident of Bajrangpur Navagaon, Ward No.l, Dist: Rajnan(lgaon-(C.G.j. Vers.us gesgondents ^:l, -fe ^'oY '5oj3io^ nyfl 'i t^ARUH VVAY S!N$ Asst. Soiicitor Genera! of India CUHAniSGARH KISH CeURT High Court Campus, Bilaspur (G.G.) ^3. ^A ^ ^"i^^iiaA y '•!-J -' 6/c- ^ofS^ State of Chliattisgarh Ttu-ough The Secretary Education Department, Mantralaya at D.K.S. Hhav.'-an, Raipur, Dist : Raipur- The District Mucation Officer, Education Department, Rajnandgaon, Dist: Rajnandgaon-jC.G.) Tfae CoUector, Rajnandgaon-tC.G.) Union of India, Through fhe Principle Secretary, Department of Personal & Traintng & Public Grievances, Shastri Marg, New Delhi CLERKtoA.3,B!L-\SPTJB WRIT PETITION U/A 226 ./ 227 OF THE CONSTTTUTiON OFINDIA - ^- XI-HC-22 ^ ^[iqi?PI,.18^ETire, •fe5iRTy 311^1^1 (^RTan^T ^^f<h ^l^ •^. ..'' (^l. WqetT(ta<fiai) U)^,^o.tfe^//04 200 SII^I ¥RIR(t'Hfei statdd sAaotw Shri RahBshAn1h.mu, Ad] ShriA.S. kacUhawaha, ShriS.K. Beriwal, Sr. With oonscnt, heard This case iclates to counscl for fhe pctitioncr workn^ as Asstt. Tcacbcr in 2001 ie. afllier 1-11-1997 and| fhat ia batoh of cases bearmgl same question orders have 80/12/2005. He pmys that casealso. • I Learacd counscl for fhe! fact aad st&tes that fhfi decision to coasider fhie cases who daed on or after 1/11/191 policy prevafcnt at that time monfhs time for fesuing: In vfcw of tfae appcario^; for tiie pariaes, merits of the case, ia fhe wffl be served if a direction te and the authoritiBes cottccmed thc petitloner ia accordance of deafh of thc employee eligibte, appouitment orders preferabfy wittrin 4 inontils a copy ofthis oider. Thc co-operation to fhe aufhorities. Willi the aforesaid disposed of. Ccrtified eppy as pcr t?ocate for the petitfoner. flovt Adv. &r thc State. Pai|iel Lawyer for Uaion ofIndia. feta|ty. coi^passioaate appwntmeat Leamed Qiat petitfoaw's feifher who was E|iucaUon Departinent Ssed. on 9-6- l&ot earlfer. It is fartttcr szibnutted JW.P. No.1322/ 2CK)2 involvn^ Ae |bcen passcd by this Court <ai. si^nilar ordcis aiay ,be passed in ttote ruteb '^iFrf^fr'? "WR?ff^ ^^t <1^ ?T< g; stfigii an^i State does not dispute tiie above of ChbattisgaFh has lakcn a bf dcpeadaats of tia.ose sanptoyeea 97 stricfty in accoTdance witb. fhe He^howevcr subiauls that four ordere msy t>e givea. made 'by fcaraed counscl cxpressu^; any opinion on the of this Court, ends ofjusttee giw^i to the State of Chhattisgsu-h to CQnsMer and decide the case of •the poUcy prevalent atfhc timc If fhe petittoner foimd be issucd as eaily as possibte thc date ofproductton/recaptof is also directed to reader due Stdte necess|aly subinfalsjons WitN>ut opnpon ;wtth co^icemed. v^u fttrfu petitijoner ob^ervatioiis, th» petition stands Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge [^ ^Ra? ^ '<?" <~—