IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4535 of 1991 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? No 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No J 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? No 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? No 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? nO -------------------------------------------------------------- VIDAJ SAHKARI GOPALAK VASAHAT MANDALI LTD Versus MEHSANA DIST CENTRAL COOP BANK LTD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR AMAR MITHANI for Petitioners MR TUSHAR MEHTA for Respondent No. 1 MR PG DESAI, GOVT. PLEADER for Respondents 3,4 & 5 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE Date of decision: 24/02/98 ORAL JUDGEMENT The petitioners have challenged validity of order dated 16th April 1991 passed by respondent No.3 whereby term of the Managing Committee of several co-operative societies had been extended upto 30th September 1991. The petitioners were aggrieved by the said order because, by virtue of the said order, term of Managing Committee of Vidaj Sahkari Gopalak Vasahat Mandli Ltd. was also extended upto 30th September 1991. Ld. Advocate Shri Mithani appearing for the petitioners has fairly submitted that now term of the said Managing Committee has already come to an end and several elections have also taken place during pendency of the present petition. In the above-referred circumstances, the present petition has become infructuous and therefore it is disposed of accordingly. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. -------