IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.3273 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.3273 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.3273 OF 2008 Atul @ Pintu Nandkumar Mohite, .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra,.. Respondent. Mr G.A.Karmalkar, for the applicant. Mr H.J.Dedhiya, APP, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 14/11/2008 DATE : 14/11/2008 DATE : 14/11/2008 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard Mr.Karmalkar, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.Dedhiya, learned APP, for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.83 of 2008 of Akluj police station. The said crime has been registered against the applicant and seven others for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 307,143,147, 149,338, 295(a), 427 of IPC and under section 135 of the Bombay Police Act. The case of the prosecution is that on 7.5.2008 one Dada Gulab Tamboli was murdered and the present applicant was the complainant in the said case. On 8.5.2008 after the burial rites of Dada Tamboli at cemetery got over the persons, who attended the last rites while returning, started pelting stones and they allegedly caused damage to some vehicles and shops. In the process, one Abhijit Bharat Upadhye sustained injury on his head. It is alleged that the present applicant was one of the persons, who was pelting stones. Looking to the nature of allegations against the applicant and considering that he has been in custody since May,2008, I am inclined to enlarge him on bail. Hence, the following order. 3. The applicant to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount, subject to condition that he shall report to the concerned police station on every alternate Saturday between 10 and 11 am till conclusion of the trial. . While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case without being influenced by the observations made in this order. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)