FAO No.4628 of 2007 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.4628 of 2007 Date of Decision: 20.4.2010 Phol Chand and another .... Appellants. Versus Rajesh Kumar and others ..... Respondents. CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present : Mr.S.S.Pathania, Advocate for the appellants. Mr.Amaninder Preet, Advocate for the respondents. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J. This appeal has been preferred in this Court with an application for condonation of delay bearing CM No.22503-CII of 2007 in which notice was issued but no reply has been filed. Even if the delay is condoned, the appeal is not maintainable in view of the fact that no substantial question of law is framed by the appellant as provided under Section 30 (Ist proviso) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (for short `the Act') because proviso to Section 30 says that no appeal shall lie against an order unless substantial question of law is involved in the appeal. Since no substantial question of law is shown to have been involved, this Court has no option but to dismiss the appeal. In view of the above, the present appeal is hereby dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 20.4.2010 JUDGE Meenu