In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 4618 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: August 24, 2009 Lekh Raj Joshi .. Petitioner Vs. Pushpa Devi and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. G.S. Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J Assailed in this petition is the order dated 5.6.2009 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Chandigarh, whereby the application moved by the petitioner-defendant under Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act has been dismissed. Apparently, from the partnership deed itself it does not transpire if booth in question was transferred in the name of partnership firm, therefore, it cannot be said to be property of the partnership. If the petitioner has any grievance that no investment was made by the plaintiffs or regarding the accounts, then he could file a suit for rendition of accounts. However, since the booth was not transferred in the name of the partnership firm, therefore, the plaintiffs- respondents shall remain the owners. No merits. Dismissed. August 24, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge