1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1288 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.302 OF 1996 Manju Vedraj Grover & Anr. .. Plaintiffs. Vs. Satyawati Seth and Ors. .. Defendants. And Subhash Seth & Ors. .. Applicants. Mr.S.D.Mogre for the applicants in support. Mr.Gaurav Agarwal i/b Bharat Joshi for defendant nos.2 to 5. Mr.Mahesh Londhe i/b Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for defendant no.6. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : APRIL 5, 2011. PC: 1. By the above chamber summons, the applicants, who are the heirs of defendant no.1 pray that they should be brought on record in place of defendant no.1, who has expired on 23rd January, 2003. The applicants had to move the above application as inspite of information given by the applicants, no application was filed by the plaintiffs to bring them on record. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submit that inspite of service none appears for the plaintiffs. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants to file affidavit of service within one week from date. S 2 3. Considering the averments made in the affidavit in support, the chamber summons is required to be allowed and is accordingly made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (R M SAVANT, J.)