1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 548 OF 1998 Hariharpal Narayanpal ....Petitioner. Vs. Mukund Limited & Ors. ....Respondents. Ms. Ranjana Torankar for the Petitioner. Mr. Vinod Tagadi i/by Mr. Piyush Shah for Respondent No.1. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 17th March, 2010 JUDGMENT:- Heard finally as listed on final hearing board. 1 Both the Courts, after considering the averments made, as well as the defence, rejected the complaint/ Revision for the correction of birth date which was moved at the fag-end of the service. The findings so recorded cannot be stated to be perverse or contrary to the record. The Supreme Court also deprecated such practice to change the date of birth at the fag end of the service. (1994 II CLR 819, State of Tamil Nadu Vs. T.V. Venugopalan), 2 The Petition is, therefore, dismissed in view of the concurrent findings so recorded with liberty. No costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)