IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 75 of 2006 (M/B) Param Jeet Singh S/o Sri Jodh Singh, R/o 248 New Modal Town, Ludhiyana, Punjab, Presently posted as Senior Manager, Bank of Baroda, Tagore Nagar, Ludhiyana, Punjab. ……… Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Senior Superintendent of Police, Nainital. 2. Station House Officer, Police Station Haldwani, District Nainital. 3. D.C. Pandey, Senior Branch Manager, Bank of Baroda, Haldwani, District Nainital. …….. Respondents Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Gaurav Joshi, Advocate on behalf of Mr. S.K. Jain, Advocate for respondent No. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Gaurav Joshi, Advocate on behalf of Mr. S.K. Jain, Advocate for respondent No. 3. 2. Mr. H.C. Pande, the learned Addl. Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioner Param Jeet Singh seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against him has, now, become infructuous, as the Police, after the completion of the investigation, has submitted final report in the case before the concerning Magistrate. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J. ) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 15.06.2006 15.06.2006 G