IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.13724 of 2010 ==================================================== 1. Ramnath Mukhiya, S/o Sri Sitaram Mukhiya 2. Raghunath Singh Kushwaha S/o Sri Nathuni Singh Kuswaha, both resident of village-Bathanaha, Tole-Bhusulwa, P.S.-Bathanaha, Distt. Sitamarhi (Bihar). …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through It’s the Principal Secretary, the Department of Rural Development, In- Patna (Bihar). 2. The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi. 3. The District Superintendent of Education, Superintendent. 4. The Bathanaha West, Grampanchayat, through It’s the Secretary, at Village-Bathanaha, P.S.-Bathanaha, Distt.-Sitamarhi (Bihar). …. …. Respondents ==================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner: Mr. Dilip Kumar Mishra, Advocate with Mr. Rajeev Ranjan 1, Advocate For the Respondent: Mrs. Namrata Mishra, G.P.-9 ==================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2. 23.8.2010. The petitioner is aggrieved by the selection of land for construction of a school at Bhusulwa Tola at Village-Bathanaha, district-Sitamarhi. Petitioner claims that a piece of land donated by his father for construction of the school is more suitable than the one selected by the Mukhiya. The location of the school in a village can hardly be a matter of concern for the Court to exercise power under Article 226 of the Constitution. Suffice that the State Government has decided to construct the school in the village. - 2 - No case for interference is made out. The Petition is dismissed in limine. Pawan/- (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Jyoti Saran, J)