1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4476/2008 Smt. Alka Rao v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 17 th October, 2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Girish Sankhla, for the petitioner. Mr. B.L.Bhati, for the respondents. .... By an order dated 16.6.2008, the petitioner was transferred from Government Senior Secondary School, Posalia to Government Girls Senior Secondary School, Sheoganj. Her transfer from Posalia to Sheoganj was made at her own request. The Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Jodhpur passed an another order dated 28.6.2008 transferring the petitioner from Government Girls Senior Secondary School, Sheoganj to Government Senior Secondary School, Sheoganj and by the same order one Harun Khan Chhipa was transferred from Government Senior Secondary School, Sheoganj to Government Senior Secondary School, Posalia. A challenge is given by the petitioner to the order dated 28.6.2008 on the count that she has been transferred from Government Girls Senior Secondary School, Sheoganj to Government Senior Secondary School, Sheoganj to accommodate respondent No.4 Narayan Lal Khandelwal at Government Girls Higher 2 Secondary School, Sheoganj, who is working at the school concern from last number of years. A reply to the writ petition has been filed on behalf of the respondents stating therein that the petitioner was transferred from Posalia to Sheoganj at her own request, however, at Government Girls Senior Secondary School, Sheoganj due to excess of Senior Teachers in the subject of Maths the petitioner was accommodated in the same town at Government Senior Secondary School and as such the order impugned was passed in administrative exigency. It is also pointed out that only with a view to adjust the petitioner in Sheoganj one Harun Khan Chhipa was transferred from Government Senior Secondary School, Sheoganj to Government Senior Secondary School Posalia. In view of the factual position above stated by the respondents, it is apparent that the transfer of the petitioner was made absolutely in administrative exigency and not for any extraneous consideration. This Court was not required to interfere with an order of transfer unless that is in violation of a statute or is an out come of malafides. No such exigency exists in present case. Thus, the petition for writ deserves dismissal, hence dismissed. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. kkm/ps.