IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT 3ILASPUR W.P.NO. 2-f^,':l/2004 / PETITIONERS iil. •-::,;:.Sn ...^ ^'['y' ^A ^^ yg%^ ^^.^ -^:^^' ^•\^y <<^y '^// t^" ^-^' •Q^': ^g.^cM ^5^$w^ nV» 0°" ,•:<>"rS" °"''', :<s{" ^^' ,^t. .^ ^^^ •tVV° yw~^ 1) Shivpal Singh Tomar S/o Ma'nraj Singh Tomar. Age<3 about 28 years, Constaole (No.371)posted at Bijapur Chowki District-Dantewada (CG) R/o Village Bhitouha PO;Harhu'la,PS Utraila. Tah si1sVyoundhar,Di stt.Rewa (MP) 2) satyanarayan Mishra S/o Hetram Mishra, Aged about 26 years, Constable (Ko. 363) posteo: at ps Bhairamgarh,Distt.Bijapur R/o Viilage Kaulahwaru POsAmilkee.PSsGovindgarh, District-Rewa {SB) . 3) Martand Pandey S/o Jagat Narayan pandey, Aged about 28 years Contable (No.355) posted . at PS Aamapalli,Bijapur l^ S./o Village POsBhanigaya, ! s Bajaherfcola,PS:Jaba [ Tah.Vyoundhar,Distt.Rewa (MP) . ; 4) i^rasen Dwivedi | S/o Nathram Dwivedi, | Aged about 25 years, | Constable (No.361) posted l at PS Bhairamgari-i.Bijapur R/o Village PO:Kotni(Gadhera) Tahsil Vyoundhar.Dist.Rewa (MP) 5) Gyanendra Ku.mar Patel S/o O/vvkfn&tir1^- Aged about 27 years, Conftable (No.365) posted at PSsJangla, Bijapur,(CG) R/o VillagesAmilakee PSsGovindBBrttDistt.Reiva (MP) . 6) Jitendra Kumar Mj.shra S/oRamniwas Hishra, Aged about 26 years, Constable (No. 374) posted at 3hopalt>atnam,Bijapur'(CG) R/o Villq.ge Amilakee, PS;Govindgarh,Dlstt.Rewa (MP). 7) Vipinchand Yadav S/o Karan Singh Yadav, Aged about 29 years, Constable (No.626) posted at PS: Sukma,Disfct.Dantswa(3a (CG) R/o Villsge Parsoli, PSsBakeber l3o "akhna, Di,;itrict-Etwa (UP) . !i g) Jagdish Patidar.S/o B. patidar, Aged about 32 years, Constasle (No.152) posted at PS Bijapur (CG) • R/o Village Salumkhedi, POsEnabad,Distt, Dewas (MP). 9) Ashok Singh Sengar S/o Makrand Singh, Aged about 30 years, Constaule (No.5) posted at PS Konta,Distt.Dantewa<3a (CG) B/o Village Bela,po;Tee;<uri, District-Rewa (MP) . 10) Gulab Singh Gahlot S/o D.S. Gahlot, Aged about 35 years, Constable (No.593) posted at PS Dantewada (CG). R/o Villase; Umbapur-Jamlee, District-Dhar (MP). 11) Vakil pr.;sad Gond S/o S.P. Gond, Aged about 35 years, Constaole (No.492) posted at Dantewada (CG), R/o Vij.la^e Bandha,PO: Uteeva PS:utia,Distt.Gwalior (MP). 12) Madan Gopal Singh Palritaar S/o G.S. parihar, Aged about 26 years> Constable (No. 230) Posted at PS Kiranail,Distt.Bantewada (CG) R/o Village POsSupia, PS GoHiadgarh,Distt.Rewq (MP). 13) t^agatpal Sl.ngh S/o D. Singh, Aged about 36 years, Constable (N.o.223) posted at Dantewada (GG) R/o Villaye Arujunpur, District-Chitrakut (UP). 14)Sheetla Tripathi S/o B.Tripathi, Aged about 35 years» Consta'ole (No. 658) posted at PS Chitagupha, Danteewada (CG) R/o Villaie Khutha.PO: Jaitware, District-Satna (MP)» 15) Krishna Kumar Tripathi S/o D.K.' Ttripathi, Aged about 35 years, Constable (No. 104) posted at PSsGolapalli. Damtewaaa (CG) R/o Village Khutha,PO;Jaitwara, District-Satna (MP), 16) Kishor Kumar prajapati S/o Harkishan prajapati, Aged about 26 years, _CQnstable (No. 375) posted at ^^£JL--^V.-.^,Y^ ^^ '^^s, r PSsPamed, Bijapur (CG) K/o Razakhedi, Sagar District-Sagar (MP). 17)Ramjash patel S/o Musauram Patel, Afled about 28 years, Consta.ole (No. 369) posted at PS; Usool, Bijapur (03) . R/o Village PO:Dangan,PS Mau, District-4lewa (MP) . VE..SUS RESPONDENTS ~W9 P-- 1) Union of India Through the Secretary, Ministry of personnel & Public Grievances Deptt, New-Delhi. 2) State of Chhattisgarh •Through t'ne Secretary, P. • Home Departi.'ent (Police) , DKS Bhawan. Raipur (CG). 3) State of Madhya Pradesh Through the Secretary, Home (Police) Department, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP). 4) The Director General of Police, •\L- Chhattisgarh Raipur (CS) . 5) The Director Geaeral of police, Madhya Preciesh Bhopal (MP) . h'RIT PETITIOtI ONDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTIT^tJTION OF I 2t D I A q,fc XI-HC-78 ^TC| •^Kjlri'y, k»T?1'(-l4ld, Rrtl'(-iy< *ll*ic»l^TT^ 3lT^?TWlf5-li* ^ ;T3II^8TSI>tira5 .•» -•y 3I1^9T IRW (i^lijcl^) ^ 200<- ?^IT8RVf^ STf^ST On a mention being mad Mr^ VirSndra Sharma, h\r. Raahavendra PradH respondent No.l. ctunsel . <S.K. Beriwal, Oepijity Advocate fcneral for the State of .12 & 4. Chhattisgarh/respondents No servico The petitioners, who a posted at District; Dantewal Articie 226/227 of the Consl re-organization of theState, State of Madhya Pradesh as of Madhya Pradesh being low to have aliocate.d their far no order has been passefl are working in the State of In the circumstances, tiiat the petitioners. may b respondent No.l through resj services to the State of Mi appearing for respondents No. tOKlfcxill 1]*fCTl ^'(sx!) •<R|'«1>( ^sri^Tsn^sT z, the matter is taken up for hearing. ^? for the petitioners. an, Standing Counsel for Union of India/ •e working as Police Constables presently ^ia, have moved this writ petition under ^itution of India. Their case is that sfter the petitioners gave their option for 1-he ^hey are permanent residentsof the State ^iaid employees, and the respondents ought to the State of Madhya Pradesh, bu* so , their allocation is not decided, cmd they Cl^hattisgarh only. l^arned counsel for the petitioners subiriits i^ ailowed to make a represental-ion to ss||iondents No.2 & 3 for ailocation of their |idhya Pradesh, to which ieoirned counsel 1, 2 A 4 have no objection. •ftl Si' XI-HC-78 4>1 \j-CTi-<4i«lrt<<,i»^.i<t(s,fqrtray-! *1Hril^1T^i an^SiSRlR-li* vpsfsn^ftSiW i»-(Bel*;':<ff Somo .Lc):^^S7. an'^ST'ratp (^g^s) W^200 ^ s^araR '(<(Sri a^v —•2.4- Having heard learned facts ond circumstances of th made byJeamed counsel for t^ to make a representation to coilnsel for the parties, having regar-d to the i^ case and looking to the lirnited r'equest ^e petitioners, the petitioners are cllowed .^e_ ^-espondent No.l ?y through respondents petitioners should make their recfei one month from today, in tur^i same shall forward it to rsspor^ months from the date of respondent No.3 again shal its comments within emo1+ier respondent No.l after consideil- No.2 & 3 and the request of order within another three With the directions In view of this order, <ni<<f»<Tli•<]<inl'iffe'<l •(Rf'l'^l'j ^aif^ran^ST ]o.2 <S. 3. In the first instoince, •epresentation to respondent No.2 wi'rtiin i, respondent No.2 after receipt of the No.3 with its comments wjthin three re<^ipt of the representation, and in turn, fdfward the same to respondent No.l with *hree inonths thereof, and ultimately, ing the recommendations of respondents the petitioners should pass appropriate morjths thereof, in accordance with law. id, the petition stands disposed of. . |.(W.)P.No.209/2004 also sta-ids disposed Parties are entitled for ^ertified copy of this order. Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge ) --i