^ %^ HI©HCOURT OF CHHATTCSSARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (5) No- 2T74 of 2008 Petitioners 1. Ram&sh Chandrc; Agrawal, S/o Late Shri Damodhar Prasad Aywwat, Aged Qbout 68 ysars, R^td- Teachar, 6ovt. High Schoot, Dondekda, Raspur (C.&.). Pr-e^ntiy R/o 2/483, Ramkund, Or-iyaa Basti, Saspur (C.5.). 2. Sadhu ftam Ttkariya, S/o Nandu Ram Tikariya, A^&d about 63 years, A^^isttint TsQcher^, 6ovt- Pnmary 5chool; W,R»5.Colony, Rdpur (C6.). 3. Gopal Pmsad 5ahu, 5/o Late Shri Anand Ram Sahu, Agsd about 58 years, AssisTant Teacher, Scthsd Smarak Middle School, ftaipur (C.^). 4. Ram KiSawon Sahu, 5/o Shiv Pra^od Sahu. Aged about 64 years, Hsad AAaster, 5hcAiid Smarak Primat'y Schoo!, Raipur (C.G.}. 5. Sohan Usl Varu, 5/o Uste 5hri Kho»nts Lol Varu/ Aged about 64 ys.ars, Assistant Teccher, Shahid 5masTOk PnmQrv School (Boys)^ Raspur (C.G.Y 6. Prakash Kussrey, S/o Late Shri Balaji l^iserey, ^ed about 65 years/ Hsad Ma5te?MS, 6oyt. Pn'morv School, amtarai, Rajpur (C.5.). 7. Krishna Kumar Yadu, S/o C.R. Yadu, ogsd about 67 y&urg, Rstired H&od Mastsr, 6ovsrnmsnt AAiddie SchooJ, W.^5- Coiony, Raipur (C^). 8. Badri Visha! Thoskur, 5/o Late Shri Nirbhay Singh 71-iGkur, agsd about 67 years, Retired AssisTanT Teacher, ^overnment Middle School, Shaheed SmopQk 'A', Raipur, bistrict ftoipur (C^). Versus Rsspondsnt^ 1. Union of Iridia, Through th& ^cretary, OepartmenT of Personnel, Publie ^rieyance ond Pension, Thlr-d FSoor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, ^han Market, New Deihi. z-:-^ ^'^ 2. Stats of Chhattisgarh, Tlirough the Secrstary, Department of School EducQtion, &.K.S. Buiiding, AAantralaya, Roipur (CG}. 3. The 5ecre.tary. DepartinenT of Fincnce, Sovernment of Chhattis9u>'h, b.K.S- BuiJdm9, ManTralQya, Raipur (C5)« 4, Dsrector, Public Instructions, Raipur (C.G.} WRFT pFrmoN UNbER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTXTUTION OF INDIA Slr^j®Bench : Hon'bk Mr. Satish K. Agnlhotri. J. Shri Vivek Ranjan Tiworj, AdvoGote for the petjtioners- Shri RGghvandrQ Pradhan, Advocate for tha re^pondsnt No.l- Shri Vashwant Singh Thokur, bsputy Advocate fienera! for tha r^^poric!snt5 No< 2, 3 oncj 4< O^.AL ORDER (Passed on this 16+h dciy of June, 2008) 1. Wilii tha conssnt of jearned coun^e! appaanng for tha partte^, tha p^tition i^ h^ord finaSIy. 2. Laarned counss! opp^aring for the petitione.r^, on in^truction^, submit^ that the ptttitiongr^ do not wont to nr&ss this petition on merit^ at thi^ stQga- Howey^r, the re^pondiBnt^/authoritias ba dirsct&d to con^idsr the pending repr&^^ntation datsd 22.8-2005 (Annexur^ P/2), on it5 own mer-it5, in accordonce with taw. 3< Shrs Va^hwunt Sin9h TTiukur, Searn&d baputy AdvocGts ^nerol Qppearing for th^ r&5pond^rits./5tat& SubtTsit^ thot there 15 no ^ rso^on i^hy th^ psnding r<£pr£5e.ritationwould not b& decid&d by th^ conc^rn&d Guthors'ty/sxpeditiou^Sy. 4 Tn visw of the abov< it i^ expsdi^nt that th^ rspr^a^ntGtson be decidsd by the conc&rn^d aulfiority/ on jt5 own marit^, 3ari acco$utdanc& with bw, wiltiin u pariod of four w^&ks from its^ dat^ of rsceipt of o copy uf thi^ ordsr. 5. It s5 ordersd occordingly. 6. In visw of th^ foregoirsg, thsg p^tstion ^tands di^po^ad of. No cost^. Thakur Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge