IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO: 26117 of 1997 Between: A.P.S.R.T.C., rep. by its Managing Director, Mushirabad, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1 State Transport Appellate Tribunal, rep by its Presiding Officer. A.P., Hyderabad 2 The Regional Transport Authority, rep. by its Secretary. Cuddapah 3 V. Maheswara Reddy, Pulivendula, Cuddapah district. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction especially in the nature of a writ of certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order dt. 17-6-'97 made in A.P.No. 50/97 Ist respondent herein setting aside the order dt. 24-12'96 in item No.41 in R.No.16303/A2/95 of the 2nd respondent and directing issue of permit to 3rd respondent on the so called town service route, Pulivendula RTC bus stand to Velpula and quash the same as being illegal, without jurisdiction and invalid. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.HARINATH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR TRANSPORT The Court made the following: ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. __________________ N.V. RAMANA, J March 29, 2005 MRR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER Copy to. – 1 The Presiding Officer representing the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, A.P., Hyderabad 2 The Secretary representing the Regional Transport Authority, Cuddapah Two C.C. s to the G.P. for Transport, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) Two C.D. Copies.