IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.617 of 2008 YUGAL KISHORE MISHRA & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 7. 07.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the counsel appearing for the state and the Bihar Public Service Commission. This application has been filed for revival of contempt petition in M.J.C. No. 1829 of 2006 stating that though compliance has been made by the opposite party (contemnors) but it is not in the true spirit of the order. Appointment letters should have been issued in favour of the petitioner at least with effect from the date, the order was passed. I do not feel inclined to accept the submission made on behalf of the petitioner because in none of the orders of this court, there was any such direction that appointment letter should be issued in favour of the petitioner with effect from the date on which order is passed. This application is dismissed. akv/ ( Mridula Mishra, J )