IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 24828 of 2007 Between: PALAPARAMBIL FANNY FLORIA, W/o. Ruben Oxy Stephen, R/o. C.K. Thomas, Plot NO.95, Boudha Nagar, Suichitra Circle Jeeidmetla, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Andhra Pradesh State Council for Higher Education, Rep.by its Member, Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad 2 The Convener, Ed.CET-2007, Ground Floor, Vijayanagar Palace, Pedawaltair, L.B. Colony (Post), Visakhapatnam - 530017. 3 The Government of Andhra Pradesh , Rep.by its Secretary, School Education, Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 4 National Council for tEachers Education, Rep. by its Regional Director, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, BANGALORE. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order or direction particularly one int the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaringthe action of the respondents in issuing aggregate of 50% marks at the Graduate Level for admision to B.ed., course as illegal and further order the respondents to accept the aggregate of 45% marks at the Graduate Level as eligible to seek admission as published in the prospectus issued to the candidates and direct the Convener to allow the candidate qualified in Ed-CET-2007 with 45% marks at Degree level as eleibgle for B.Ed. course without insisting 50% at the Graudate Lelvel and declare the NCTE (National Council of Teacher Educaiton) guidelines are not binding on the petitioenr/students in view of prosectus and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.GANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: C.SUDESH ANAND(SC FOR APSCHE) The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: Sri M. Ganga Rao, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, seeks to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. GODA RAGHURAM, J Date: 28.2.2008 cvm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MJA}