1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2270 /2010 (Amitkumar U Gajbhiye vs. State of Maharashtra and others ) _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : 08th December, 2011. The matter is being considered since long by this Court. In response to order dated 16th September, 2011 the respondents have filed affidavit on 30.11.2011 vide Stamp No. 11643/2011. Perusal of that affidavit reveals that petitioner has appeared only for the post of Craft Instructor Mechanical General Electronics. Examination for remaining two posts i.e. of Project Officer and Technical Superintendent was required to be independently conducted and petitioner has not appeared in that examination. Mrs. Bharati Dangtre, learned Addl. Government Pleader has invited attention to question papers which are filed as Annexures R-1, R-2 and R-3 with said affidavit to show that questions 2 papers on all three subjects were different and were required to be answered separately. Each subject, therefore, had separate marks of 100, 100 and 200. She also points out that duration of two hours was given to answer each question paper. According to her, though petitioner mentioned his Roll Number for remaining two subjects on his answer paper, while solving question papers for the post of Craft Instructor he has not solved those separate question papers. According to Advocate A. Sambre, the examination was conducted simultaneously and, therefore, others also have not solved such separate question papers. According to hm, it was only one question paper.. After hearing respective counsel, we find that petitioner is attempting to raise certain disputed questions which cannot be resolved satisfactorily by this Court. Hence, with liberty to petitioner to avail the legal remedies as open to him in the matter, we dispose of the present petition. JUDGE JUDGE sahare