SBCMA No.790/2008 Abdul Hafeez & Anr. Vs. Smt. Kamla & Ors. A/w two similar appeals. -{1}- SBCMA No.790/2008 Abdul Hafeez & Anr. Vs. Smt. Kamla & Ors. SBCMA No.791/2008 Abdul Hafeez & Anr. Vs. Smt. Kesar & Ors. SBCMA No.792/2008 Abdul Hafeez & Anr. Vs. Jeetu Khan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : - 12.9.2008 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. Abdul Aizkhan, for the appellant. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the appellant. In these three appeals, the tribunal has exonerated the Insurance company on the ground that victim deceased as well as the injured they were travelling in the goods vehicle and, therefore, their liabilities not covered under the Insurance Police and consequently, the Insurance Company is not liable. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that in fact, the deceased was the owner of the stone slabs and he was travelling with his goods in the transport vehicle. It is SBCMA No.790/2008 Abdul Hafeez & Anr. Vs. Smt. Kamla & Ors. A/w two similar appeals. -{2}- submitted that because of act of God, the tyre of the truck burst and the track turned round resulting into accident. In view of the very specific statement of the witnesses produced by the claimants themselves except Smt. Kesar, the wife of the deceased all stated that they were travelling in the goods vehicle not as an employee or as owner of the goods or representing of the owner of the goods. In view of the above reasons, if the tribunal has exonerated the Insurance Company, the tribunal only passed the award in accordance with law. There is no merit in these appeals and the same are hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-