IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1084 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.519 OF 2007 Anish Subhash Mokal ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.Shreekant V.Gavand for Applicant. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. APRIL 3, 2008. APRIL 3, 2008. APRIL 3, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Having regard to the evidence which has come on record and the finding reached on that basis by the lower Court which, in my view, appears to be a possible view, no case for bail is made out. 2. The offence in question is serious offence for which the Applicant has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten : 2 : years. The Applicant has already undergone only a period of about one year so far. In the circumstances, this Application is rejected. 3. The Applicant will be free to renew the prayer for bail after one and a half years from now, in the event, the Appeal does not mature for hearing. It will be open to the Applicant to file paper-book so as to make the Appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Liberty to apply for early hearing. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.