^o ^l^ l*. HIGHCOURTOFGHHATnSGARHATBIU^PUR DIVISJON BENCH CwaiL : HOWBLE SHRI RA.IEEVGUFTA. G.J. & HON'BLE SITOT.P. SHARMA. J. WBWTAPreAl.lto.«^f2009 Pradeqa Kumar Arya, aged about 28 yeare, S/o N.R. A@?a, R/o Indersep Nagar, 27; di, APPELLANT/ PETITIONER: VERSUS RESPONIMENTS^ 1. The State of Chtnttlsgarh, throi^h Sea-etaEy tts SeGretary Tribatwelfare Department; 0.K.S, Bhaflsut, Raipur 2. Hlgh Level 6aste Serutlny Committee, through jts Director, R. tteendayal Upadhyay Nagar, Se^or-4, Raipur 3. Secretary, Home Department, D.K.S. Bheawan, Raipur 4. Superintendent of PO)(I»,Bilaspur WraTAPP^LUNDERSKmQWZOFTHEI-UaiCOURTOF CHHAtTB©AJW^ E^^^^^BtROllACT.^Ofr Present: Shri Parag Kotecha, leamed counsel for the . appellant/petttioner. Shrt Kisftore Bhadurt, teamed AdEBttonal Advocate GeneraKbrtheState/respondeots No. 1 to 4. JUDGMENT (16mFetM'ua^,200a) The following judgment offte Gourtwas p^sedtoy RajeevGu(rta,C.J.: Leamed couflsel fbrthe parti^are heard onadmisstem. fl. \ 2. Appellant PrErieep mar Arya has fitet this wit Eqapeal again^ the order dated 22.01;2(W9, passed in W.P. No.3600009: ia%, fS^ .;•>• —•••1^. . & "'"«:. '^. "" V. ^t ^. '^?-'-'' /•;• "^"' ... ^''-'' '"'^s'ss'^'"''. 3. Appellant/PetiBoner fited the vwit petiBCTi for the foltowing rellefs: "1 The Hwi'ble Court maiy kimlty be pieased to quash«l the caidttion tn the letter dated 14.08.2008 (Annean-eP/10), by whlch it has teen djrected, to verily the Permanent Caste Certtflcate, from the respondent No.2. II Orin attemative, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be please to quash ttie letter/order (Annexure P/3) issued bythe respondent No.2 and dired the respondent no.2 to verify ftie Permanent Caste Certiflcate ofthe petitionw. III Thel-ton'bteCourtmaykindlybedirectthe respondent no. 3 and 4 to allow the petttioner to join to the post of Sub Inspector as p«rselast IV The Hon'ble Court may ktndly be todireGt respondent No. 1,3 and 4, that if they had any doubt, the Permanent Caste Certificate of the petitioner.they may sent the matter to any committee for the purpose of va'ifteaUon ofthe Caste Certificate of the petitioner. V TheHon'ble Gourt mayklndtybeplease to call for the records of the case Trom 8ie respondent. VI AnyotheTreliefwhtehttifeHon'MeOourt deems flt and proper under th® facts and circumstances of the case and In the interestof Justice and cost ofthe petition may beawarded fn favourofthepetitloner." 4. Leamed Single Judgefinding thatthe rellefesoughtbythe appeUanypetitioner in thlswrit petition were ahnost simtlar tothe rellefe claimed by htm in the eariier wrtt petitlons, dismtesed We writ petltlon as not mairrtainable. 5. The prtitiofter's entire claim in the writ pditlon »ba^d on the alleged non-compllance by respondent No.2 of the onler dated 19.12.2008 passedlnW.P.(S)No.671^2008. ,.iys^"', ^;^-^ .?' ,r tk s 1S>. ->,. J.? \^ ^,^^ ''•(t.^—f"'' ^fi- padma 6. From the impugned order tt is grthered that Uie appeUant/petitionerhasatreadyflted a corrtempt pelition against the oflteers of respondent No.2 fbr willful tUs-obediwice of the Court'sorderdated 19.12.2008. 7. On due considerationofthesubmlssionsoftheteamed counsel Tor the parties; we do not flnd any ground warranting interference !n thfe writ appeal. 8. The vwlt appeal, theretore.ia liabte to be dianlss^land is hereby dismissed sumntartly. Sd/- ChiefJustiGe Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge