AB 2151/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. BARUAH Heard Mr. A.M. Buzarbaruah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. K. Munir, learned P.P. appearing for the State of Assam. On requisition, the case diary is placed before this Court for disposal of this bail application under Section 438 CrPC filed by the petitioners namely (1) Sri Jitendra Nath Sarmah (2) Sri Niranjan Agarwal (3) Sri Rohan J. Paul and (4) Smti. Tina Ghosh. From the records, it appears that the petitioners are the employees of Assam and North Eastern Region of the Reliance Telecom Ltd. On acco unt of filing of allegation of threat, by one Susanta Saikia a customer of the R eliance Company and the owner of the Mobile Phone No.9864034174, Shri Biraj Das, DSP,STF was directed to make an enquiry into the alleged threat that claimed by Mr. Susanta Saikia. Said Biraj Das made a preliminary enquiry and the same bein g filed before the STF, STF P.S. Case No.03/2011 was registered under Section 42 0/384/506 IPC R/W Section 66A IT Act. Mr. Buzarbaruah, learned counsel for the petitioners submits before this Court that the petitioners being employees of Assam and North Eastern Region of the Reliance Telecom Ltd. are not entrusted to collect any bill from the custom ers not to speak of Mr. Susanta Saikia who had been allegedly threatened by one Asok Tyegi, an employee of the Delhi based firm M/S Lyons Factoring Services Pvt . Ltd.. Mr. Buzarbaruah, therefore, submits that the petitioners herein cannot b e dragged in the case as indicated above. In view of the submissions, the materials available in the case diary, are meticulously perused wherefrom, it appears that the petitioners are n ot entrusted by the Reliance Telecom Ltd to collect bills from the customers and that they not criminally liable for the acts done by the aforesaid Tyegi of Lyo ns Factoring Services Pvt. Ltd. Under the above facts and circumstances and the materials available in t he case diary, it finds no ground to reject the bail application under Section 4 38 CrPC. Accordingly, the interim order provided vide order dated 22.7.2011 by th is Court is hereby made absolute. Accordingly, this bail application stands disposed of.