IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9328 of 2010 SANT LAL RAI, S/O LATE CHAITU RAI, R/O MOHALLA- BHAGWANPUR, P.S. SADAR, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A & E), BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUZAFFARPUR. 5. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION, MUZAFFARPUR. 6. THE DISTRICT ACCOUNTS OFFICER, MUZAFFARPUR. 7. THE CIRCLE OFFICER CUM CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, MUSHARI, MUZAFFARPUR. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 23.6.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as well as Mr Binod Kumar Labh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Accountant General. The grievances of the petitioner is that although his pension has been revised and sent to the District Accounts Officer, Muzaffarpur, as would be appearing from Memo No.1682 dated 8th of March, 2010 issued by the Office of the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna, as contained in Annexure 7, but he is not getting the revised pension. It is further submitted that on perusal of the aforesaid letter, as contained in Annexure 7, it would appear that the service book of the petitioner was not readily available and as such it was suggested by the office of the Accountant General through the aforesaid letter to get the duplicate service book of the petitioner prepared and further steps be taken for payment of revised pension. It is submitted that the claim for payment of revised pension of the petitioner could not be settled as yet despite representation, as contained in Annexure 6, to 2 the concerned authority. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that notwithstanding the above, for expeditious disposal of his grievances with regard to the payment of revised pension, the petitioner proposes to represent his grievance by filing a fresh representation before the District Accounts Officer, Muzaffarpur (respondent no.6), with a copy to the Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna (respondent no.3) and the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur (respondent no.4). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the representation of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner with regard to the payment of revised pension could be redressed without further delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)