IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 3RD SEPTEMBER 2010 / 12TH BHADRA 1932 RP.No. 213 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.19511/2009 Dated 14/08/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): 2ND RESPONDENT ------------------------------------ MALIPPARA SERVICE CO-OP. BANK LTD. NO.E.18, MALIPPARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.P.P.JACOB RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS & 1ST RESPONDENT -------------------------- 1. P.N.VENUE, ASSISTANT SECRETARY, MALIPPARA SERVICE CO-OP. BANK LTD. NO. E. 18, MALIPPARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. ANNIE JOSE, SENIOR CLERK, MALIPPARA SERVICE CO-OP. BANK LTD. NO. E. 18, MALIPPARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. GRACY GEORGE, JUNIOR CLERK, MALIPPARA SERVICE CO-OP. BANK LTD. NO. E. 18, MALIPPARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. RAJAN V.K., JUNIOR CLERK, MALIPPARA SERVICE CO-OP. BANK LTD. NO. E. 18, MALIPPARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. ANICE P.J., JUNIOR CLERK, MALIPPARA SERVICE CO-OP. BANK LTD. NO. E. 18, MALIPPARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. LILLYKUTTY KURUVILA, JUNIOR CLERK, MALIPPARA SERVICE CO-OP. BANK LTD. NO. E. 18, MALIPPARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. RP NO.213/2010 7. M.V.KURIAKOSE, ATTENDER, MALIPPARA SERVICE CO-OP. BANK LTD. NO. E. 18, MALIPPARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 8. JOSE K.MATHEW, JUNIOR CLERK, MALIPPARA SERVICE CO-OP. BANK LTD. NO. E. 18, MALIPPARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 9. V.D.MOHANAN, SECRETARY, KERALA CO-OP. EMPLOYEES UNION, KOTHAMANGALAM TALUK COMMITTEE. 10. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OP. SOCIETIES(G), ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.THAMPAN THOMAS MR.P.N.SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.K.RAMAKUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- R.P.No.213 of 2010 in W.P.(C.) No.19511 of 2009 (H) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 3rd day of September, 2010 O R D E R Although the judgment was rendered disposing of the writ petition without hearing the review petitioner due to their absence, no ground indicating any error apparent on the face of the judgment is pointed out in order to exercise the power of review. Therefore, the review petition is only to be dismissed and I do so. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg