IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition PIL No. 741 of 2008 Neeraj Raghuwanshi. ……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others. ………. Respondents Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Brief Holder for respondents Nos.1 to 4. Mr. S.K. Mandal, Advocate for respondents Nos. 5 & 6. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J V.K. GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) We have very carefully gone through the contents of the writ petition, the counter affidavits filed by the respondent as well as all the documents annexed in the case and find that no public interest is involved in this case. Apparently, perhaps the petitioner has filed this petition for some private or personal interest because we find that the petitioner nowhere contends in the writ petition that the Villagers are not capable of looking after their own interests. Apart from the aforesaid, we also find that as far as respondents Nos. 5 to 8 are concerned, no illegal action can be attributed to them. The writ petition is dismissed. (V.K. Bist, J.) (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 30.03.2009 30.03.2009 G