RFA No.3516 of 2006 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.7913-CII of 2010 and RFA No.3516 of 2006 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.7.2010 Satpal ..Appellant. Vs. UT Chandigarh ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.P.C.Dhiman, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Sanjay Kaushal and Mr.Deepak Sharma, Advocates for the respondent. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J.(ORAL) CM No.7913-CII of 2010 Notice in the application was issued. Learned counsel for UT Chandigarh states at the bar that no reply to this application is required to be filed as facts narrated in the application are correct. It is submitted that the present appeals bearing RFA Nos.3516 of 2006, 1747 of 2004, 4212 of 2001 and 3291 of 2002 are covered by the decision rendered by this Court in RFA No.2989 of 2006 titled as Union Territory, Chandigarh Vs. Behal Singh Gill and another decided on 18.5.2010. He further submits that the present appeals could be disposed of in terms of the aforesaid decision. RFA No.3516 of 2006 -2- After hearing the counsel for the parties, the present application is allowed and the four appeals bearing RFA Nos.3516 of 2006, 1747 of 2004, 4212 of 2001 and 3291 of 2002 are disposed of in terms of the order passed in RFA No.2989 of 2006 titled as Union Territory, Chandigarh Vs. Behal Singh Gill and another decided on 18.5.2010. (Rakesh Kumar Jain) 23.7.2010 Judge Meenu