IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.10566 of 2011 Baldeo Ravidas @ Sunil @ Dina @ Santan Jee Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 04/ 12.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 11.9.2010 in a case registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 324, 307, 353, 302 of the IPC, 3, 4, 5 of the Explosive Substance Act, 25(i-b), 26,27, 35 of the Arms Act and 17 CLA Act. It would appear from perusal of the first information report that one co-accused, namely, Shashi Bhushan Sharma was caught after alleged occurrence and he disclosed name of his associates including the petitioner. Admittedly, no specific overt-act has been attributed against the petitioner in the first information report. Earlier Sr. Superintendent of Police, Gaya reported to this court vide his letter no. 365 dated 26.5.2011 that altogether 16 cases had been instituted against the petitioner but learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has challenged about institution of the cases in Aurangabad district and thereafter this court called for a report from SP, Aurangabad who reported that only one case i.e. Goh P.S. Case no. 105/1990 had been registered against the petitioner in Aurangabad district whereas in the report of SP Gaya, it has been shown that altogether four cases had been registered against the petitioner in Aurangabad district. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that so - 2 - far as cases registered in Gaya district is concerned, petitioner has already been released on bail except in one case which is said to be pending in the court of Fast Track Court IV, Gaya because the petitioner has no knowledge about issuance of permanent warrant of arrest against him. It is further contended by him that, as a matter of fact, police is in habit of remanding the petitioner in the cases which take place in the Gaya district. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Baldeo Ravidas @ Sunil @ Dina @ Santan Jee, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Konch P.S. Case no. 20/2010 subject to the condition that one of the sureties must be close relative of the petitioner and holder of the landed property. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)