IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITIN NO.2 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.225 OF 2007 Gopalrao M. Patil & Ors. ....Petitioners V/s. Sambhajirao B. Patil & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.Vijay Patil for the Petitioners. Mr.R.V. Govilkar for Respondent No.1. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 23RD JANUARY, 2007. P.C. : 1. Rule. Rule returnable and heard forthwith. 2. This Review Petition has been taken out by the parties who were not parties to the main petition. When I passed the orders sought to be reviewed, it was not pointed out to me and I overlooked the fact that the matter clearly falls for the consideration of the Division Bench and not a single Judge. After having pointed out the provisions to Mr.Govilkar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.1, he admitted this to be so. 3. In this view of the matter, it is not necessary to consider the other arguments on behalf of the Petitioners. 4. In the circumstances, the Review Petition is made absolute in terms of prayers (a) and (b).