IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23691 of 2010 1. PRAMOD SINGH, son of Rajendra Singh, resident of village – Daulatpura, P.S. – Narhat, District – Nawada. 2. Anil Singh @ Karyanand Sharma, S/o – Ramawatar Singh, resident of village – Jhikarua, P.S. – Narhat, District – Nawada. --------------- Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------------- Opposite Party. ------- 02. 03.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. It is submitted that petitioner no. 1 namely, Pramod Singh, has already been apprehended, hence, prayer to this extent has become infructuous. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application with respect to petitioner no.1, namely, Pramod Singh, is dismissed as having become infructuous. Petitioner no.2 is also named accused in this case carries allegation of abducting brother of the informant who on rescue made his statement under section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code, though not named the petitioner but, now it comes that victim was married with niece of petitioner during his abduction. However, it is further submitted that now everyone accept the marriage which was a result of some prolonged sweet relationship. If it is so, and informant his brother the victim, as well as the girl with whom victim is said to have married, all the three by appearing as witnesses support the factum of settlement and marriage etc. with their free will and consent without any coercion and informant and the victim both - 2 - stood as bailors. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks of receipt of the copy of this order, petitioner, namely, Anil Singh @ Karyanand Sharma, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 89/2009, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for one year or till disposal of the case whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, the liberty shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)