HtsH coum' OF cm-pAn-IWH: aimggug Writ Petition (5) No. 1m (pf 2908 Resgondens, Petitionel's 1) Bansh Ial Rajwade' Son of Late $andhan RaMade, aged abcut 25 years, unemp1oyed.’ f 2) Subasu, Wife of Late Bandhan Rajwade; aged about 65 years, Caste Rajwade; Both resident of Vlnage Laxmmur Ponce Qtatmn Pratappur Tahsn Sumjpur Distnct v SurgUja(CG) Versus 1) South Eastern Coameids Limited through the Chairman cum Managing Drreotor Seepatl . Road Bilaspur(CG) 2) The Charrman-cum-Managing Director South Eastern Coamelds Limited, Seepat’ Read, A Bilaspur(CG) 3) The Personnei Manager Bhatagaon Sub Area District Surgula (CG) (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of’lndla.) SB: Hon’ble Mr. Sah‘sh K. Agnihotl’i‘, J. Present; Shri Ashok Kumar Shukta, counsel for the pettticners. - Shri P.S. Koshy, counsel for the respondents. ORAL ORDER: > (Passed on 29‘“ February,2003) Learned counset appearing for the petmoners submtts that the petrtroners do not want to press thrs petrtlon on merit except that the appeal dated 29-3 2007 (Annexure P/5) pendmg before the Charrman-oum-Managtng Director, South Eaetem Coatt’letds Limited, be decided expeditiousiy, in accordance with iaw, on its own merit. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the mpondems submits that there is no reason as to why, if appeal is pending, be not decided within reasonable time. 3) ln View of the foregoing and according to learned counsel‘eppearing for'the‘ g petitioners, nothing survives in this matter; The respondents authorities may do the . needful accordingly. a 4) ln view of the above, this petition is disposed of accordingiy. Consequently, l.ANo.1 also stands disposed of; Sd/— I Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ”