IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUD ICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 25918 of 2005 DATED: 13.10.2006 Between: Smt M.Chandramma and others petitioners And The Managing Director, APSRTC Musheerabad, Hyderabad and others Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO. 25918 OF 2005 ORAL ORDER: The present writ petition is filed seeking the following relief. “……declaring the action of the respondents particularly the action of 3rd respondent in not passing the bill submitted by the 4th respondent as per the sanction of 2nd respondent as arbitrary, unjust, in violation of Articles 14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to arrange the deference of wages for which the 4th respondent has submitted the bill in view of sanction accorded by the 2nd respondent in respect of payment of minimum wages in the interest of justice and fair play.” Learned counsel for petitioner mainly contended that the petitioners are entitled to minimum wages for the period 1.9.1996 to 30.9.1997 and the same is not being paid to them in spite of the sanction accorded by the 2nd respondent. A detailed counter affidavit is filed denying the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and inter alia stating that after processing the records the competent authority has accorded sanction for payment of difference of minimum wages and the payment will be made in a short period after verifying all the paid vouchers once again so as to avoid double payment. The learned standing counsel for respondent corporation on instructions submitted that the corporation has paid the amounts to which the petitioners are entitled to after verification of the records and in view of the same, no orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition. The learned counsel for petitioner disputed the calculations made by the respondent corporation and submitted that the petitioners were paid about Rs.1,00,000/- and they are entitled to a further amount of Rs.10,000/-. In view of payments of arrears to the petitioners by the respondent corporation, no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition. However, if the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to avail the remedies open to them under law. Subject to above, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA,J DATE: 13.10.2006 Tvk 98 THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 25918 of 2005 DATED: 13.10.2006