HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CRM No.M-6850 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.05.2011 **** Surjit Kumar . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Rose Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Puneet Bali, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. MC Berry, Addl. AG Punjab **** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). Learned State counsel states that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required. (2). Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that the petitioner shall keep on appearing before the Investigating Officer as and when required. (3). In this view of the matter, the interim order dated 07.03.2011 is made absolute. (4). Disposed of accordingly. Dasti. 10.05.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge