THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3546 OF 2010 ORDER: Heard. The present civil revision petition is filed against the order in I.A.341 of 2010 in O.S.No.515 of 2008 dated 19.07.2010 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kothagudem, where under the learned trial Judge dismissed the petition filed under Section 63(2) to (5) of the Indian Evidence Act. The document that is sought to be marked, is zerox copy of a registered sale deed. There is no material to show the existence of the unregistered sale deed at any point of time and there is also no material to show that when exactly the zerox copy of document was taken. The original un-registered sale deed never saw the light of the day. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that there is substantial material to show that the petitioner had purchased the property and has been in possession of the same since long time, and entries in the revenue records show the same. The said contention may be true and the petitioner, who is the defendant in the suit, can resist the suit by taking all those pleas. But, coming to the question of admissibility of zerox copy of the document, in the circumstances, the same cannot be said to be admissible. As such, there are no merits to admit the C.R.P., and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. Once again it is made clear that the petitioner herein, who is the defendant in the suit is at liberty to resist the suit claim on the basis of other material like revenue records etc. No order as to costs. ___________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. 1st October 2010 Rns