IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35411 of 2009 1. SATYENDRA YADAV @ SATYENDRA KR.YADAV, S/O BHRIGHNATH YADAV VILL- GAREYA, P.S.-SHAHPUR, DIST-BHOJPUR. 2. JITENDRA YADAV S/O BHRIGHNATH YADAV VILL-GAREYA, P.S.-SHAHPUR, DIST- BHOJPUR. 3. BHIRIGUNATH YADAV @ VIKAM YADAV @ BHIRIGUNATH YADAV, S/O RAMNATH YADAV, VILL-GAREYA, P.S.-SHAHPUR, DIST-BHOJPUR........Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR...................................................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 02. 26.11.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case under Sections 323, 354, 341, 323,504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(x) (V) of S.C./S.T. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that they took the name of the caste to which the informant belonged and assaulted the wife of the informant. It is submitted that the allegations are vague because of the caste is not specified, and as such, the provisions of Section 3(X) (V) of S.C./S.T.Act are not attributed. Be that as it may, the petitioners, namely, Satyendra Yadav @ Satyendra Kr. Yadav, Jitendra Yadav and Bhirigunath Yadav @ Vikam Yadav @ Bhirigunath Yadav are directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks in connection with Ara S.C./S.T. P. S. Case No. 29 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M.,Bhojpur, 2 Ara, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)