1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION No. 11916 OF 2009 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 25 OF 2009 Vijaylal Sakahrlal Barot Applicant V/s Malalk Jaysain Malak Gulab since deceased through his L.Rs. & others Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. R.R. Mantri, Advocate for applicant. Mr. M.G. Mustafa, Advocate for Respondent No. 1. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE, J.) DATE : 27th November, 2009. 1. Heard Shri Mantri, learned counsel for the applicant, and Shri Mustafa, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1. 2. The matter was heard and admitted on 06-04-2009. While admitting the matter reasoned order has been passed, thereby interim relief was refused. However, matter was ordered to place for final hearing after six weeks. The matter is not heard thereafter as was directed and hence the present Civil Application is filed on 13-11-2009. 3. Heard parties. This court by reasoned order on earlier 2 occasion rejected the interim relief, there are no additional or subsequent facts pointed out in the application to seek stay to the impugned order except that the matter is not heard within period of six weeks. 4. In view of this, I do not find any reason to modify or grant any interim relief as has been prayed for, as it would be amount to review of the order. 5. In view of this, the Civil Application is rejected and any further action be taken subject to the result of Civil Revision Application. (R.K. DESHPANDE) JUDGE SDM/ca11916.09