IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No. 2349 of 2010 Date of decision : 01.10.2010 Rameshwar ...Petitioner versus Dharambir and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Raj Mohan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) Crl. Misc. No. 44823 of 2010 Heard. There is a delay of 102 days in filing the petition. Heard, for the reasons mentioned in the application, which is supported by affidavit, the delay of 102 days in filing the petition is hereby condoned under the present set of circumstances. The crl. misc. application stands disposed of accordingly. Crl. Revision No. 2349 of 2010 At the very outset, learned counsel intends to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioner to file statutory appeal before the Court of Sessions Judge along with an application for condonation of delay. 2. In this view of the matter, the instant petition is directed to be dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 3. Needless to say that the concerned Court would consider the application for condonation of delay sympathetically (Mehinder Singh Sullar) Judge October 01, 2010 naresh.k