IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID TUESDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 19TH MAGHA 1932 RP.No. 620 of 2009() ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN CRP.980/2004 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3/ DEFENDANTS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. S.N.TRUST, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY S.N.TRUST OFFICE,KOLLAM. 2. THE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, S.N.TURSTS, CHEMPAZHANTHY PO,REP BY ITS CONVENOR. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, S.N.COLLEGE, CHEMPAZHANTHY. BY ADVS. SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNAN SRI.A.R.EASWARLAL RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS & 4TH RESPONDENT/ PLAINTIFF & DEFENDANTS ----------------------- 1. SABEENA,W/O. SHIHABUDEEN AGED 31 YEARS KUNNATHUVILAKATH VEEDU, CHEMPAZHANTHY, ULIYAZHUTHURA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SHAMEENA,D/O. SHIHABUDEEN,(MINOR) AGED 8 YEARS, RESIDING AT DO..DO.. 3. THESIAMA,D/O.SHIHABUDEEN,(MINOR) AGED 8 YEARS, RESIDING AT DO..DO.. 4. SHIHABUDEEN, S/O. ADIMA AHMAD OILKLAI AGED 54, KUNNATHUVILAKATH VEEDU, ANIYOOR, CHEMPAZHANTHY. 5. LAILA BEEVI, W/O.SUBAIR KHAN RESIDING AT KUNNATHUVILAKATHU VEEDU ULIYAZHETHURA VILLAGE, ANIYOOR,CHEMPAZHANTHY. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------ R.P.No.620 Of 2009 in C.R.P.No.980 of 2004 ---------------------- Dated this the 8th day of February, 2011. O R D E R This Court, by order dated 12.12.2008 in C.R.P.No.980 of 2004, set aside the decree and judgment in O.S.No.1705 of 1999 on the file of the Additional Munsiff Court, Thiruvananthapuram and decreed the suit as prayed for with costs to the plaintiffs throughout. The original suit was filed under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act. Respondents 1 & 2 who are the defendants 1 & 2 in the suit filed the review petition praying to review the judgment of this Court in C.R.P.No.980 of 2004. During the pendency of the review petition parties settled the disputes between them. They have filed I.A.2564 of 2010 to record the terms of compromise and to pass an order in terms of the compromise. In view of the above said circumstances, the review petition is allowed. The judgment under review is recalled. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. bkn/-