BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Second day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16922 of 2011 1. MURUGAN 2. MAHESH 3. PARAMASIVAM : PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.3 to 5 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MELAPALAYAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. (CR.NO.877 OF 2011) : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.M.A.JINNAH Advocate For Respondent : Mr. K.S.DURAI PANDIAN Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 147, 148, 323 and 506(ii) I.P.C. and Section 4 of TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.877 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and seek anticipatory bail. 2. Heard Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioners are an innocent person and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that they are ready to abide any condition likely to be imposed against them and therefore, the anticipatory bail petition may be considered. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital. 5. Considering the submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, No.V, Tirunelveli, subject to the following stringent conditions:- (i) All the petitioners shall jointly deposit a sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred only) to the credit of Crime No.877 of 2011 before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, No.V, Tirunelveli; (ii) On such deposit the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned learned Judicial Magistrate Court, No.V, Tirunelveli; (iii) The petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation; and (iv) The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 22/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.5, TIRUNELVELI 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MELAPALAYAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT +1 CC to M/S. S.M.A.JINNAH Advocate SR.No.45229 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16922 of 2011 Date :22/12/2011 NSV/22.12.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/