1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1346 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4657 OF 2006 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr Sarang Aradhaye h/f Mr R.V.Govilkar, for the applicant. Mr.R.M.Patne, AGP, for respondent nos 2 and 3-State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 28/08/2009 PC: Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this civil application the applicant-respondent no.1 in the writ petition has made the following prayer: “(a) The order dated 31.7.2006 passed by this Hon’ble Court, be modified and the stay granted, be vacated and the applicant herein be permitted to complete the auction sale in all respects to effectively discharge its obligation to see that the property sold under auction, is lawfully and physically handed over to the auction purchaser.” T 2 I have perused the order dated 31.7.2006. That order was passed after hearing the learned counsel for applicant-respondent no.1 in the petition. The learned Judge, while granting stay, had recorded reasons. Having considered the reasons recorded by the learned Judge, in my opinion, the prayer, in the instant civil application, cannot be granted. Hence, the civil application is rejected. However, looking to the nature of controversy involved in the writ petition, hearing of the writ petition is expedited. Liberty to the applicant to move for fixed date of hearing after Diwali vacation. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)