HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.31673 of 2010 Date : 25.01.2011 Between : P. Renuka Devi & another. …..Petitioners And State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Principal Secretary, Home Department & others. …..Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.31673 of 2010 ORDER : This writ petition is filed, seeking directions by way of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondent No.2 in not initiating action against respondents 3 and 4 and in not restraining them from interfering with the civil disputes pending between petitioners and respondent No.5, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioners claim ownership and possession over the house bearing No.8-3-229/D1/25, situated in Road No.11-A extension, Sravanthi Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. The petitioner has filed a private complaint against respondent No.5 under Section 200 Cr.P.C. on the file of the XVII Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally Criminal Courts, alleging that respondent No.5 is trying to trespass into the above said property. The said complaint was referred to Police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., and on such reference, a case is registered in Crime No.530/2010 for the offences under Sections 324, 326, 354, 447 and 506 of IPC on the file of P.S.Jubilee Hills, on 3rd of December 2010. In this writ petition, it is the grievance of the petitioners that inspite of reference of complaint to the Police, investigation is not being made, and further, respondents 3 and 4 are interfering with the civil disputes existing between petitioners and respondent No.5 without any authority of law or jurisdiction. On last occasion, the matter was adjourned to enable the learned Government Pleader to obtain instructions. Based on the written instructions, dated 21.12.2010, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that in Crime No.530/2010, investigation is being made and for want of collection of evidence, it has not been completed. It is stated that steps are being taken to collect evidence and investigation will be completed as early as possible and final report will be filed. With regard to interference, it is submitted that there was no interference by respondents 3 and 4 with the civil disputes existing between petitioners and respondent No.5. Except the allegation of interference, which is denied by the respondents, there is no material in proof of the said allegation of petitioners. In any event, as it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that there is no interference with the civil disputes, by respondents 3 and 4, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, placing on record the statement of the learned Government Pleader that respondents 3 and 4 are not interfering with the civil disputes existing between petitioners and respondent No.5. At the same time, it is open for the respondents to complete the investigation in Crime No.530/2010 and file appropriate final report as early as possible. Subject to the above observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 25th January 2011 ajr