Crl.Misc No. M 34121 of 2009 (O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc No. M 34121 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : December 07, 2009 Jatinder Kumar and others, ...... Petitioners (s) v. The State of Punjab and others, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. D.S.Kamra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Mehar Deep Singh, DAG Punjab for the official respondents. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) During arguments, counsel for the petitioners has modified his prayer. He states that while the petitioners have made complaints (Annexures P-8 and P-10), now during the pendency of this petition, their apprehension has come true and respondent No.9 has moved a complaint under Sections 498A/406/34 etc of the IPC. The factum of subsequent complaint has been confirmed by counsel for the respondents on instructions from Mr. Harbir Singh, SHO Police Station Phase I, Mohali (respondent No.5). Crl.Misc No. M 34121 of 2009 (O&M) ::2:: Counsel for the petitioners states that he would be satisfied if investigation into the complaint of respondent No.9, as well as complaints of the petitioners (Annexures P-8 and P-10, is carried out simultaneously. Counsel for the respondents, on instructions from respondent No.5, has no objection to the above prayer. In the circumstances, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.5 to examine the complaints (Annexures P-8 and P-10), along with the latest complaint which is stated to be filed by respondent No.9, and decide the same in accordance with law. As regards the prayer for security, when the estimated cost of security has been put to counsel for the petitioners, he said that the petitioners are not in a position to afford the same. He, however, prays that respondent No.5 may be directed to prevent the forcible entry of respondents No.7 to 9 into the petitioners' house. Respondent No.5 has assured this Court that he would see about this. As the main petition has since been disposed of, all the pending civil miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) December 07, 2009. JUDGE `kk'