IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’IVI‘ISGARH ‘ BILASPUR ‘ Writ P¢t1t10n (Cl No. 6472 of 2008 (Writ Petition Under Article 226] 227 of thc Constitution of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Mr. Anoop Majumdar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A. S. KaChwaha, Deputy Advocate Generai with Mr. Bhaskar Pyasi, Panel Lawyer for the respondents No. 1 and. 2. \O R 1'3 h- R (Passed on this 2N1 Day of Febmary, 2009) 1. With the consent of lealned counsel appearing for the parties the matter is heard iinaiiy. 2. Mr. A. S. Kachwaha, learned counsel appealing for the respondents N0. 1 and 2 submits that the netitioner has already been paid compensation and the petitioner would be allotted a plot as a measure of rehabilitation wherever other similarly situated shop owners have been rehabilitated. 8. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that no compensation has been paid to the petitioner. If the compensation has not been paid, the same sha“ be paid to the petitioner, in accordance with law. Since the Municipal Corporation has already decided to allot shop to the petitioner in the area wherever other similarly situated shop owners have been rehabilitated, nothing survives in this matter. The petitioner may apply for grant of compensation and allotment of shop, if so advised. 1n view of the foregoing, this petition stands disposed of. No Petitionér Badn‘ Prasad Gupta, Sjo Chanduial Gupta, aged about 35 wars, R,’o Sa 3r «12w, Kawardha, Distxict— Kabirdham (C.G.) Vm‘sus ‘ Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Urban XVBIfare Dgpartment, D.K*S. Bhawan, Maniraiaya, Raipur (C. G.) 2. Chief Executive Ofticer, Municipal Council, Kawaxdha, District * Kabirdham (C.G.) / order asto costs. . . Sdl— Agn'ihoh‘l 'l‘hakur satish K Judge