IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.578 of 2009 Date of decision: January 14, 2009 Ranbir Singh ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Y.P. Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) The primary argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he had made a detailed representation before the higher authorities but the same has been decided by completely non-speaking order. In the circumstances, order Annexure P-3 is set aside and the respondent No.2 is directed to take a fresh decision on the matter regarding the adverse Confidential Report for the period 13.09.2007 to 22.01.2008 by treating this writ petition as representation and by passing a speaking order thereon. Needful to be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. January 14, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE