IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAHISGARH AT BiLASPUR fQ*'^-JftVl <?T CONTEMPT GASE N0, IIJ- OF 2008 PE-TITIONER: v.y pses B*ea 153.^^ ^s^ •^ Harishankar Gupta, S/o.- Shri K.P.Gupta Aged about 46 years, OccupatiQn- Service (Working as Assistant Teacher in Primary School Salkapara), R/o- Village Salka, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C,G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT: 1. Nand Kumar, S/o- Not known to the petitioner, Aged About- 52 years, working as Secretary Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. V.S, Yadav, S/o- Not known to the petitioner, Aged About- 40 years, working as Collector- Surguj'a Distt. Surguja (C,G,) 3. Miss. Augustina Khalkho, S/o- Not known to the petitioner, Aged About-48 years, working as Distrlct Education Officer - Surguja, Distt. Surguj'a (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE - 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WtTH SECTION 12/15 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT. sn^i^iTfiFri^ ^IT STE^T'gRNi' ,c' -<c "5^ •*IWW<i,W^^S, T^fRTy ^&rv^. <^ t^.|12-/2^?g TOnwoftg aii^i SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan IShrivastava, J. 24-08-2011 None for the petitioner, even inj This contempt petition has be^n disobedience of Court order dated Oi .J^o.96/2008. The case of the petitioner ^s petitioner aggrieved by the order of petition, in which, an interim order wa^ directing status quo with regard to today, shall be maintained until furljher communicated to the respondent/coi|itemnor (Annexure C-2) stating that charge and therefore, posting of the petitio(ier thereafter, petitioner is not being allovfed. On petitioner's own showing, 11-12-2007. Interim order was pass^d petitioner has not stated anywherej passing of the interim order on 08-0' any order passed so as to disturb th^ 08-01-2008. In that view of the matter, 1 an1 matter. Accordingly, the petition is disnjiissed. ^NHqtT'WRlf •? 1SIS> •rfsf^IT ^T3lRPT3iI^[ thesecond round. filed by the petitioner atleging willful 3-01-2008 passed in Writ Petition (S) ^s stated in the petition is that the tl-ansfer dated 22-07-2007, filed a writ passed by this Court on 08-01-2008 jposting of the petitioner, as obtains orders. Order of the Court was vide letter dated 09-01-2008 not been taken from the petitioner, may be allowed. However, even ^ie was relieved thought ex parte on by this Court on 08-01-2008. The in the contempt petition that after 1-2008, any action has been taken or status, which has been obtained on not inclined to proceed further in the Sdi- ManindraMohanShrivastava Judge lill<(<ft<f^^l*l ^'IK<!WI, tl^-li^lt'd—FS/140—2/2011—1,50,000.