IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12598 of 2011 RAM BADAN PANDIT & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 376, 341, 323, 342/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The specific accusation of establishment of forceful physical relationship is against Chandan Pandit. The accusation against the petitioners is that they restrained the informant and his victim daughter to go to the police station for lodging the F.I.R. From the F.I.R., it appears that the petitioners were not present when the offence under Section 376 of the I. P. C. was committed by Chandan Pandit. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the case has also been lodged by the petitioners’ side against the informant. Considering the fact that only non 2 bailable offence is alleged under Section 376 of the I.P.C. which is specific against Chandan Pandit, let the petitioners, Ram Badan Pandit, Lalan Pandit and Santu Pandit, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Begusarai Muffasil P.S. Case No. 55 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Begusarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)