IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Stay Application NO.6517 of 2010 In Writ Petition No.661 of 2010 (S/S) Chandra Shekhar Joshi. ……Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ….Respondents. Mr. M.C. Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.C. Tiwari, Brief Holder for the State-respondents. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 05-07-2010 passed by respondent No.2 (Annexure No.1) to the writ petition. During the course of argument, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the representation is pending before respondent No.2 i.e. Mahanideshak Chikitsha Swasthya and Pariwar Kalyan Vibhag, Uttarakhand, Dehradun, for disposal but no decision has been taken by the respondent No. 2 till today. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that if the order is passed to decide the representation, he has no objection. The prayer made by the petitioners is innocuous in nature. The respondent No.2 i.e. Mahanideshak Chikitsha Swasthya and Pariwar Kalyan Vibhag, Uttarakhand, Dehradun is directed to take decision on the representation of the petitioner dated 26-07-2010 annexed as annexure No.6 to the writ petition, 2 expeditiously preferably, within a period of two weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order by speaking and reasoned order. With the said direction, the writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Stay Application stands disposed of accordingly. (B.S.Verma, J.) 06-08-2010 MK