BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Saturday, the Twelfth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.9206 of 2011 1. V. DHANASEKARAN 2. D. SAGUNTHALA 3. D. LATHA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUPARANKUNDRAM, MADURAI RURAL DISTRICT, CRIME NO.18/2011. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT B.RAJA THILAGAM .. INTERVENER For Petitioner : M/S. R.DEENATHAYALAN Advocate For Respondent : K.S.DURAI PANDIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) For Intervener : Mr.P.MAHENDRAN, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are accused in Cr.No.18 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offence under Sections 498(A), 406 and 506(ii) IPC. r/w Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act Apprehending arrest, at the hands of the respondent police, the petitioners are before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2. The de facto complainant has filed M.P.No.1 of 2011 seeking permission to intervene. The same is allowed. Earlier, on the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Bench. 3. Today, a report has been received from the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Bench, wherein, it is stated that the matrimonial dispute has been settled amicably between the parties. The jewels owned by the defacto complainant were returned by the accused. The de facto complainant assured that she would not take any action against the accused and they have settled the dispute in accordance with the law. Further, it is stated that the de facto complainant has agreed to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ withdraw this complaint. 5. In such view of the matter, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with the following conditions : 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.VI, Madurai, on each executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. sd/- 12/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, MADURAI. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUPARANKUNDRAM, MADURAI RURAL DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. R.DEENATHAYALAN Advocate SR.No.39226 SR : 15.11.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9206 of 2011 Date :12/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/