nnmonnnanroccnnnn IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. WP. N0... \ . a ..../2001 1 Samyukta Kayla Sinatmk Sangh, Petitioner No.1 Through 1ts Sccrstary Akhtar Javed R¢s1dent of Wcst Jhagrakhand C01116ry Dist-Kersa (Chhattisgarh) Pstitioner No.2 £4, 2‘ Aktar Javed, Clerk Grade-I, Jhagrakhand Sub Arsa / 7 At/PO-West Jhagrakhand Colliery, Dist. Kamehhattisgaxh) Vs. 1. Coal India Limitsd, through Its Chainnan—cum—Managing Director, 10, Netajee Subhas Road, Kolkata .. Respondent No. 1 ... Rospondent No.2 Through Its (‘hanman-cum—Managmg Duector, 2 South Eastem Coalfields Lmuted Seepat Road, Bllaspur(Chhatt1sgarh). PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . I'—HC~2Z X WW WWW a .V x I» w p Na. ”3‘ g mmmaftm $WW WW ~%731i?‘m’a11%¥f 09.02.2964 Shri Bhm’at Raiput, counsel for the ] )etitioner. Shn' Vinod Desllmuldl, counsel f6r1 ‘ ‘espondents no.1 and 2. Shri Deshmukh submits that Resdondems N01 and 2 have .hled an aphhcétion (I ANOI1834/7002) for dismissal of the mfmctuous Para 2 of the apphcahon 13 16! ant how and quoted below “Thai 0y OMNo CIL/C 5BOR/ZTC/SECT/1219 dated . 20.3.2002 the rea'zzo That respondent ho family) q‘L T C to the 0.1M restomzg tie faetlity ofL T L is fled harem as Document wmaxure A) The above E‘statement is recordw. In this ’View of the matter, this petition has‘ becomé infrucmous. Since the i'eiiefs claimed’by the pe titionei‘s‘ have already been granted, this petition is disposad of accordipgly. ‘ m Damion on the gound that 1t has become dent no I Coal Indta hm restored thefactltty ¢ I L.T.C. to the emploj ens of the C I L mid Its subsidzary companies 4 Is an aubndzmy of Coal Indm Ltd as such :ts employees have now been restored Copy of Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge