1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5658 OF 2009 _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office } Memoranda of Coram, } Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's } orders or directions } and Registrar's orders } ___________________________}___________________________________ Mr. S.B.Talekar, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr.V.G.Shelke, A.G.P. for State. Mr. R.A.Tambe, Advocate for Respondent no.8. ........................... [ CORAM : B.R.GAVAI, J. ] DATE : 10/11/2009. PER COURT : 1. From the impugned order, it can be seen that the learned Tribunal has rejected the application for injunction only so far as original respondent no. 4-B (respondent no. 8 herein) is concerned. 2. From the record, it is clear that both the petitioner as well as respondent no. 8 are having common claim through their deceased father Jafarmiyan. I do not find any error in the order of the learned Tribunal, 2 thereby rejecting the prayer for injunction against the person whose rights are common as that of the petitioner. 3. From the perusal of the impugned order, it is clear that the learned Tribunal did not close the issue of grant of interim injunction against rest of the respondent after due service to them. No case is made out for interference. Hence rejected. Needless to say that the interim order granted earlier stands vacated. [ B.R.GAVAI ] JUDGE knp/WP5658.09