IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 11TH MARCH 2011 / 20TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 7624 of 2011(C) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- JINESH K.PAUL, H.S.A (HINDI) TEACHER, EBENZER H.S, VETTOOR. BY SRI.KURIAN GEORGE KANNANTHANAM, SENIOR ADVOCATE, ADVS. SRI.TONY GEORGE KANNANTHANAM, SRI.P.C.JOSEPH PAZHEPARAMBIL. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPT., GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-01. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA-686 673. 3. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-01. 4. THE HEADMISTRESS, EBENZER H.S, VETTOOR, MUVATTUPUZHA-686 672. 5. THE MANAGER, EBENEZER H.S, VETTOOR, MUVATTUPUZHA-686 672. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. NISHA BOSE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/03/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.7624 OF 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of March, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is working as H.S.A (Hindi) in the school managed by the 5th respondent. It is mainly prayed that the 3rd respondent may be directed to take a decision on Exhibit P9 revision petition after hearing the affected parties. 2. It is a case where the petitioner's appointment was initially approved. The salary was also paid upto September 2000. Later an audit objection was raised as per Exhibit P3, and Exhibit P4 is a communication issued by the District Educational Officer in the matter. Finally, the matter is pending before the 3rd respondent-Director of Public Instruction. It is pointed out that in the meanwhile, hasty steps are being taken to recover the salary. Therefore, it is prayed that the revision petition may be directed to be disposed of within a reasonable time and the proceedings for recovery may be kept in abeyance. Heard the learned Government Pleader appearing for W.P.(C) No.7624/2011 2 respondents 1 to 3. There will be a direction to the 3rd respondent to take a decision on Exhibit P9 revision petition, after hearing the petitioner and the respondents 4 and 5, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till orders are passed in the revision petition, any further action for recovery will be kept in abeyance. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition for compliance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp