IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Criminal Misc. No. M-9151 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision:19.05.2008 Joginder Singh and others .....Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. K.S.Kahlon, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, DAG, Punjab. **** RAJESH BINDAL J. On 9.4.2008, notice of motion was issued by recording the following contention of learned counsel for the petitioner:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner No.1 had filed a suit for declaration to the effect that Teja Singh son of Saun Singh and Kaka Singh son of Saun Singh was the same person, who was father of petitioner No.1. The suit was decreed by the Civil Court on 18.09.2006. The suit was filed on 03.02.2005 after the death of Teja Singh @ Kaka Singh on 15.03.2004 and accordingly there is no question of impersonation. Teja Singh @ Kaka Singh was not even party to the suit. Even in the proceedings before the Revenue authorities, the petitioner No.1 was representing his deceased father Teja Singh @ Kaka Singh. The complainant has no relation whatsoever with the petitioners.” Learned counsel for the State does not dispute the fact that the petitioner has already joined the investigation. The Will in question is subject- matter of civil suit which is still pending. Be that as it may, without opining on the merits of the controversy, interim bail granted to the petitioner on 9.4.2008 is made absolute. The petition is disposed of. May 19, 2008 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) renu JUDGE