IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-60617 of 2006 Date of Decision: February 05, 2008 Mahabir Singh ......Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr.Ramesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Anter Singh Brar, DAG, Punjab. Mr.N.S.Sodhi, Advocate for the complainant. *** Rajesh Binal,J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of the last order passed by this Court on November 30, 2007, he has already executed the sale deed for 1 kanal of land in favour of the complainant to make up the deficiency. The factum of registration of sale deed in favour of the complainant is not denied by his counsel. However, he submits that the expenses for registration of the sale deed had to be borne by the complainant for no fault on his part. Keeping in view the fact that the deficiency in the land which was allegedly sold by the petitioner to the complainant has already been Crl. Misc. No. M-60617 of 2006 -2- made good, in my opinion no custodial interrogation of the petitioner would be required. Accordingly the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 29.9.2006 is made absolute. The petition is disposed of accordingly. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE February 05, 2008 sunita