IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9340 of 2008 SUBODH MANDAL & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 04.07.2008 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The case has been registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act against unknown regarding killing of a person. In course of investigation one Rajendra Dharhi has been examined by police and he in his statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. described that at the time of occurrence the deceased was caught by this petitioner and Subodh Mandal and at that time he was fired by Mantu Singh which proved fatal. Submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has no motive to kill. The killer is Mantu not the petitioner. The eye-witness has described the manner of occurrence according to which the petitioner has actively participated in the murder. Considering the allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly his prayer for bail is rejected. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)