IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 19TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 30TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 5813 of 2008(P) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SWAMINATHAN.T.S., S/O.SUBRAMANIAN, THERAYANGOD HOUSE, EZHIKKAD P.O., MUNDUR, PALGHAT. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON. RESPONDENT: ---------------------- THE CENTURION BANK OF PUNJAB LTD., 723-THIRUMALAI TOWERS, 2ND FLOOR, AVINASHI ROAD, COIMBATORE, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER (FR) S.PRAKASH. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/02/2008,ALONG WITH W.P.(C). NOS. 5850/2008, 5884 & 5885/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) Nos.5813, 5850, 5884 & 5885 OF 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of February, 2008 J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~~~~~ All these writ petitions are filed by the same writ petitioner against the same respondent with a prayer to set aside the order of attachment passed on in the respective interlocutory applications in the original petitions pending before the District Court, Palakkad. The learned counsel would submit that the order of attachment passed by the court is legally incorrect and not sustainable and therefore, prays for staying the operation of the order and for a direction to the court below to consider and dispose of the matter in accordance with law. Strictly speaking only an interim order is passed and it is neither revisable nor it is to be interfered by exercising jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. But at the same time, when an order is passed against a party, who is aggrieved by the same, it is the paramount duty of the court to see that the said applications are disposed of, in accordance with law, after hearing both sides concerned, as expeditiously as possible . W.P.(C) Nos.5813/2008 & connected cases. 2 Therefore, I dispose of all these writ petitions with a direction to the District Judge, Palakkad to consider and dispose of the interlocutory applications pending before it regarding the attachment within a time frame of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly. (M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE) ps