My \®\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. 517i2001 Suguna PETITIONER Anupam Kumar Agaxwal, S/o. Shn’ Ram Krishna Lal Agaxwal, aged about 37 years, CQntIactor, R/o. Puram Bati, Kayasthapara Chowk, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Mines and Minerals; Mantralaya, ShastrigCilowk, Raipur (CG) 2. The CoHector, Mahasamund (CG) 3. The Director, Department of Mines, Ravi Gram, Ring Road, Raipur (CG) - WRIT PETITEON UNDNER ARTICLES 226(227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS [83: Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agihotxi, J.l Shn' Sankalp Jaiswal, counsel for the petitioner. i Shri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate Generai for the State. ORDER ' (Passed on this 15th day of November 2007) Learned counsel appearing forfthe petitioner submits that in View of the reply flled by the petitioner that the State Government has restored the lease by invoking revisional jurisdiction vested on it by the Maii‘hya Pradesh Minor Mineral Rules, 1996 under Rule 58 as nothing survives in the matter and the petition has become infructuous. Learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State does not controvert the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed as having become /"'\ \ Satish K» wow / ’L‘. .A (“ti ‘ infractuous. t Sdl- t \ ‘ Jadge g.