1 (crim appln 3453 of 2010) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3453 OF 2010 Ashik Ali Abid Ali and Anr. ...Applicants Vs. Kuldeep Singh Succha Singh Batti @ Bhalla and Anr. ...Respondents ----- Mr.A. Majid H. Banderkar for Applicants Mrs. P.P. Bhosale -APP for the State Mr. B.B. Tiwari for Respondent NO.1-Orig. Complainant ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 13TH AUGUST, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Applicants, Respondent No.1-Original Complainant and the Learned APP for the State. 2. This application has been filed by the Applicants under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India r/w. section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the complaint filed by the Respondent NO.1-Original Complainant for the offences punishable under sections 407, 420,467, 468 of the Indian Penal Code which is registered with the Taloja 2 (crim appln 3453 of 2010) Police Station vide C.R. No. 4 of 2010 on 4.1.2010. 3. The Applicants and the Respondent No.1 have filed the Consent Terms which are signed by the parties and their respective advocates. A copy of the Memorandum of Understanding is also tendered in this Court. Since the parties have settled the dispute in view of the judgments of the Apex Court in the cases of B.S. Joshi vs. State of Haryana, reported in AIR 2003 SC 1386 and Jagdish Chanana & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Anr. reported in AIR 2008 SC 1968 in my view, the complaint will have to be quashed. 4. Application, therefore, is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clauses 10(a). 5. Application is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE J.)