IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. //<;~-?^- / 2009 PETITIONER VERSUS ^^..-\^' ?^°^ Susheel Kumar Jain S/o Shri. Vijaylal Jain Aged about 57 years, Presently posted as Asstt. Grade-III, under Deputation to Industrial Training Institute, Mana Camp, RAIPUR(C.G.) RESPONDENTS 1 1. .^' 1 ^'^^ ^<><'^-"* ^^^.J^^ STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Through: The Secretary, (Transport Department) D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, RAIPUR-492001(CG) The Secretary, (Technical Education, Manpower Planning, Science and Technology Department) D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, RAIPUR- 492001 (CG) The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh Infrastmcture Development Corporation (CIDC) G.E.Road, Near Mantralaya, RAIPUR- 492001 The Divisional Manager, Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation (CIDC) (Transport Division), Raipur Depot. Divisional Office, RAIPUR (CG) WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTiON-CT-m&IA L^:9 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (8) No. 4572 of2009 PETmONER RESPONDENTS Susheel Kumar Jain. VERSU8 State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION LTNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'fele Slui Satish K. Agmliotri, J. Present: Shri B.P.Rao, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V.Slmdhar, Panel Lawyer forthe State. Shri Ratan Pusty, Advocate for the respondent No. 3 and 4. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 24m day ofOctober, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on mstmGtions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage, however, he prays that the respondent- authorities may be directed to consider and decide his pending representation dated 23 June, 2009 (Amie?aire P/9), as early as possible. 2. Leamed counsel appearmg for the State/respondents 1 and 2 submits that the representation, as aforestated, shall be coiisidered aiid decided in accordance with law m its perspective, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of4 weeks fromthe receipt ofa copy ofthis order. 3. In view ofabove, accordmg to leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioner, nothing sundves for adjudication at this stage. 4. Accordingly- the writ petition is disposed of —— Anut Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge