IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 28TH MARCH 2008 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1930 RP.No. 384 of 2008(B) --------------------- (AGAIST THE JUDGEMENT DATED 8.2.2008 IN W.P.(C) 2747/2008(B) REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS: ---------------------------- 1. T.J.ANTONY, THATTASSERY HOUSE EAST OF AYYAPPANKAVU, KOCHI-18 (PAINTER {RTD.} K.S.R.T.C. CHALAKKUDY) 2. V.A.CYRIL, VALIAPARAMBIL HOUSE UDYOGAMANDAL, ELOOR, NEAR EASTERN U.P.S. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT (STATION MASTER {RTD.} K.S.R.T.C., ERNAKULAM. 3. M.S.KUNJU MOHAMMED, MULLAKKARA HOUSE ETTUMUNA, KARUVANNUR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT (INSPECTOR {RTD.}, K.S.R.T.C., THRISSUR) 4. MANUEL PHILIP, MULLAPARAMBIL HOUSE H.NO.1/120, SEA VIEW, FORT, VYPIN, KOCHI-1 (VEHICLE SUPERVISOR {RTD}, K.S.R.T.C, ERNAKULAM) 5. P.R.SINKARAN, PANAKAPARAMBIL VENNALA P.O., KOCHI-682 028 (CHARGEMAN {RTD} K.S.R.T.C., ERNAKULAM) 6. C.K.SHEELA, ADHIYODI HOUSE KOORANCHERRY P.O., THRISSUR (W/O.A.K.BHASI, TICKET ISSUER {EXPIRED} THRISSUR) BY ADV. SRI.K.P.JUSTINE RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-23. RP.No. 384/2008/B -2- 2. THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR & CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-23. 3. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER (PF SECTION) KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION TRANSPROT BHAVAN, FORT P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-23. 4. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ERNAKULAM. 5. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER K.S.R.T.C., THRISSUR. 6. THE ASSISTANT TRANSPROT OFFICER K.S.R.T.C., CHALAKKUDY. BY SRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN, SC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ======================= R.P. No.384 of 2008 in W.P.(C) No.2747 of 2008(B) ======================= Dated this the 28th day of March, 2008 ORDER The petitioner filed the writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to pay him statutory interest on the the provident fund amount from the date of retirement till the date of payment. However, by mistake the judgment was passed directing payment of provident fund and staff welfare amounts. It is in this circumstance, petitioner has filed the review petition. I am satisfied that in view of the facts disclosed, the judgment needs to be reviewed. Accordingly, the judgment dated 8.2.2008 is recalled and the writ petition is disposed of afresh. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE jp