t^ A ^ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETmON.NOto '/2004 PETITIONER Tribhuwan Kumar Singh, aged Ataxjt 43 years, S^o. Shri. B. Sngh Assistant Teactrer Isum^ai, Bock Luncfra, District Su-gt|a, Cftiattisgarh VERSUS RESPONDENTS r:*h-'r': :-:-"•:";*?». a-\ ,c>'^ 8-..^^i-' .^c^ Y^^ ./ .••'j^ta/' 3. State dt CSihattisgarh, Thrcxgh: Secr^ary, Gcwa'nment of Chhattisgarh, S.C./ST. &O.B.C. Welfere Develcpment Departmert, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaira, Raipu", Chhattisgarh The Commssioner, S.C./S.T. &O.B.C. wafare Developmert Dqsartmert Raipir, Chhattisgarh. 71ie Assi^ant Oomm'ssioneT, S.C./S.T. &O.B.C. Wfelfare Development Dq^artmert, Surguja, Q^rict ajrgija, Chhattis^rh Ramkumar Srgh, aged about 41 yews, S/o. B. Sr^h, Asastant Teacter, Primary Sehool Khajoorpara, Bock Lurcfra, District Sirguja, Chhattisgarh aock EdLcation Officer, Bock Lundra, a^rict Su-guja, Chhattisgarh // WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA F ,3H XI-HC-22 7E? ^lTqRTq, ^•d1y'l<»,T«l<11*)lj,< 3iI^?T 'VRFSR ^^...^.S...SQ.^&5.1 iira?iT atii^i an^i'm 1^1?;'311^1 ^^ ^T?^ -.<*• iiililjNtK?-"" 31'K^t'FRIIW: flftd 06.04.2004 Shri Ranblr Singh, counj Sbrl "Atehll Agrawal , P. I) I.A.No. 1445/2004 for u|: Heard. Learned counsel for thel allegatlons were levelled pursuant to allegations he has been posted in hls place| subsequently respondent No.4| submitted that the petitionel hls grlevance as per Annexur] has not yet been AecldeQ . Havlng considered and w| on the raerits of the case, ends of Justice wlll be serv| the petltioner to make a repj grievances before the compet^ alongi-.'lth a copy of thls pet. days, and on such representa' authority of respondents sha.'. of tne parties lncludi.ng res. In accordance '.'.'lth law as eaj •til''<trl''fl-< t|l^l?lT'?fsI?t <Riit$i< ^arfiw sn^i lel for the petltioner. . for the State. u|rgent hearing i.s ailloweQ. petitioner submits that agjainst respondent N0.4 and w|as removed and the petlt.i.oner He further submits tfaat has been reinstated. It 1s has ^-^made a representation agalnst •^ P/5 to respondent N3.5, whiah ih [tthout expresslng any opj.nion the opinion of this Cburt, |tce if a dlrection 1s given to •esentatlon afresh raising his ^nt authority of respondents ^.tlon and the or<3er, 'v.l.th.in 15 1-ion bel.ng filed, the competent 11 decid'e the same after hearing t>ondent N&.4, on Its own merlt^ •ly as possible preferably [^ife^ ^ XI-HC-22 T^ -<<l^ld^, axfly'is, I««liyy flTWT aiicfr •^ 200 sn^iqii h-u'^1 sf^v ww?^fta ./ llglisis'"" ani/- sii^i wiTw^riN wlthin 3 months from the dat sentat.i.on. It 1s made clear remains, th-e petjitioner raay under the law. With the aforesaid obse disposed of. Cbnsequently. M.W.P.No.. also stands dlsposed o£. 06rtifled copy as per r ^ of recelpt of the repre- that If any grievance stlll ^vail th6 reraedy available ("vations, this petj.tj.on stands ^85/2004 for interim relief ^1^4^ Tn1:T^i' ^ 'fe1^ •(f^'^R ^ 3ti;gt( sii^i ^les. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge