KBP 1 cri.appln.no.1515-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.1515 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.477 OF 2008 IN SESSIONS CASE NO.213 OF 2007 Naseem Ahmed Habib Ahmed ..Applicant Vs State of Maharashtra ..Respondent -- Mr.S.Premchandra, for applicant. -- CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 8 th APRIL, 2011 P.C: This is a second application for bail filed by the present applicant. Earlier bail application of the applicant has been rejected by this Court on 12 th June, 2009 by a reasoned order. 2] Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that there is no evidence on record to establish complicity of the applicant. 3] We find no substance in this argument. Prima facie, on the basis of evidence on record, we find no difficulty in reiterating our earlier view that the prosecution has proved that the present applicant is involved in the KBP 2 cri.appln.no.1515-10.sxw offence in question. He was working with the complainant and he was seen carrying the kidnapped child. Ransom demand was made thereafter. This is indeed not a case where bail can be granted to the applicant. 4] Criminal Application is rejected. However, liberty is granted to the counsel for applicant to move this Court for fixing early date of hearing of the Appeal. [R.G.KETKAR, J.] [SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.]