IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11068 of 2009 UMAR FAROOQUE @ FAROOQUE, S/o Md. Aminuddin Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 17.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Though the prayer for anticipatory bail is vehemently opposed on behalf of the learned counsel for the informant, he failed to point out the dissimilarly. Petitioner’s father who happens to be the Mukhiya of the Panchayat, has allowed bail by a Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. no. 7852 of 2009, rather I find petitioner’s stands on better footing, as its Committee passed resolution Mukhiya is one of the members not the petitioner. The petitioner is only son of the Mukhiya. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 147 of 2005, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Araria subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)