1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 4172 of 2008. [Vilas Moreshwar Avdhutkarane] v. [Chief Executive Offricer Zilla Parishad, Yavatmal and another] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri N. D. Khamborkar, Advocate for petitioner. Coram : B.H. Marlapalle and A.H. Joshi, JJ. Dated : 17th NOVEMBER, 2008. When this petition was called out for admission on 1-10-2008, it was adjourned at the request of Shri Mohan Dandekar Advocate holding for Advocate Shri N. D. Khamborkar for the petitioner. Today when the petition is called out for hearing and admission, none appears for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is regarding the appointment as the project affected person. There is nothing on record to show that such a vacancy exists. Being a project affected person by itself cannot be a reason to issue such directions unless it is 2 demonstrated by the petitioner that the recruitment process stipulates reservations for project affected persons. Hence, it will not be possible to entertain the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The proclamation issued by the Respondent No.1 Zilla Parishad for appointment of Gram Sevak on contract basis is at Anexure-IV to the petition memo, and there is no reservation shown for project affected persons in the said proclamation. It is thus, clear that the petitioner's claim is not based on the said proclamation. Hence, petition is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE //Muley//.