IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23068 of 2010 ANUJ KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 28.9.2010 KHAN Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under section 394 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that neither the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. nor he has been put on the test identification parade. He further submits that in fact nothing has been recovered from his possession and a false seizure list has been prepared. Learned State counsel submits that the looted articles have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he was identified by the informant on the test identification parade. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after three months. (S.P.Singh,J)