IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P NO. 1319 OF 2009 DECIDED ON : 28.01.2009 Paramjit Singh ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT Present : Mr. Siddharth Sanwaria, Advocate, for the petitioner. SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is aggrieved at the order dated 03.07.2007 passed by the Revisional Authority, whereby the resumption order, in respect of a flat purchased by him from the original allottee, has been upheld on the ground that the same was being misused. Earlier also, the petitioner had filed C.W.P No. 1425 of 2008 challenging the afore-mentioned order and the same was dismissed by this Court. The second writ petition has NOW been filed on the premise that some new information which was not in the knowledge of the petitioner earlier, has now been obtained by him under Right to Information Act and therefore, fresh cause of action has accrued. C.W.P NO. 1319 OF 2009 -2- Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of documents on record, I am of the considered view that the petitioner's contention that a fresh cause of action has accrued in his favour, is wholly misconceived for the reason that the information now relied upon, could be obtained by him previously also. No subsequent event has taken place which could be said to have altered the situation. The second petition on the same cause of action is clearly barred. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. JANUARY 28, 2009 (SURYA KANT) shalini JUDGE