IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.13011 -M of 2010 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : AUGUST 4, 2011 RAMAN KUMAR & ORS. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: None for the petitioner(s). Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, praying for quashing of FIR No.17 dated 31.1.2009 under Sections 160, 323, 324, 341, 148, 149 Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Division No.1, Jalandhar (Annexure P- 1), on the basis of compromise dated 7.4.2010 (Annexure P-3). From the perusal of the order sheets, I find that either the case has been adjourned on the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners or none appeared for the petitioners. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has pointed out that charges have already been framed and the trial has been stayed in view of orders of the court passed in connected case viz. CRM 12241-M of 2010 (Sachin Bharti and others v. State of Punjab and another). Since no one appears for the petitioners or respondent No.2/complainant, the factum of compromise cannot be verified and, therefore, the petition is dismissed. August 4, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE