1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (CONTEMPT JURISDICTION) TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2010 THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.977 OF 2010 ************ Sanjay Gupta, 80/6, Dwaraka Flats, Anna Nagar West, Chennai - 600 101. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Ashok Dongri The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Chennai- 600 005. 2.Manoharan Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Division IV Sub Division II Chennai- 600 010. ... Respondents Contempt Petition praying that this Court be pleased to punish the respondents for contempt of Court for wilfully disobeying the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 05/10/2004 and made in W.P.No.23663 of 2004 as clarified by order dated 10/06/2009. The above Contempt Petition coming on this day before this Court for hearing in the presence of Mr.K.Sridhar Associates, Advocate for the petitioner herein; and of Mr.P.Wilson, Additional Advocate General for Y.Bhuvanesh Kumar, Advocate(for TNSCB) for the respondents herein; and upon reading the petition and affidavit of Sanjay Gupta, filed herein; and the Counter Affidavit of L.Manoharan, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 filed herein; the Court made the following order:- This Contempt petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for contempt of Court, for willfully disobeying the order of the Court, dated 05.10.2004, made in W.P.No.23663 of 2004, as clarified by the order, dated 10.06.2009, made in W.P.No.23663 of 2004. 2.At this stage of the hearing of the contempt petition, the learned Additional Advocate General, appearing on behalf of the respondents, had pointed out that the order passed by this Court, on 05.10.2004, in W.P.No.23663 of 2004, had been recalled, by an order, dated 23.11.2004. In such circumstances, the contempt petition filed by the petitioner, to punish the respondents, for wilful disobedience of the earlier order passed by this Court, on 05.10.2004, cannot be maintained. 3.In view of the said submissions made by the learned Additional Advocate General, appearing on behalf of the respondents, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner has not shown sufficient cause or reason to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order, dated 05.10.2004, made in W.P.No.23663 of 2004, as prayed for by this petitioner, in the present contempt petition. Hence, this Contempt petition stands closed. Witness the Hon'ble Thiru M.YUSUF EQBAL, The Chief Justice of High Court at Madras, as aforesaid, this the 14th day of December, 2010. SD/- DEPUTY REGISTRAR (OS) //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2010. COURT OFFICER (O.S.) From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the orders/judgments/Decrees in this format. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3 Cns. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.977/2010 THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN ORDER DATED : 14/12/2010 FOR APPROVAL :28/12/2010 APPROVED ON :28/12/2010 Copy to: 1.Ashok Dongri The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Chennai- 600 005. 2.Manoharan Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Division IV Sub Division II Chennai- 600 010. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/