IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23734 of 2011 Mangal Pandey Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03/ 28.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report and it appears that name of this petitioner came in course of investigation. The learned trial court has reported that charge has been framed against the petitioner on 14.11.2005 and up till now only seven witnesses out of 17 chargesheeted witnesses have been examined. It appears from the report of the Addl. Sessions Judge that there is no likelihood of disposal of the case of the petitioner in near future. It further appears from the report of the List & Computer section of this court that some co-accused persons have already been granted privilege of bail. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Mangal Pandey, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge FTC V, Rohtas at Sasaram in Sessions Trial no. 264/2005 arising out of Nasriganj P.S. Case no. 103/2004 subject to the conditions that one of the sureties shall be close relative of the petitioner who shall give an affidavit disclosing genealogy and this fact that as to how he is related to the petitioner. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)