IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.52 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : AUGUST 31, 2010 RAVINDER KAUR & ANR. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Manohar Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Charu Tuli, Sr. DAG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners have been given appointment letters and have been allowed to join and, therefore, the cause of action does not survive. Disposed of as infructuous on the statement of the learned counsel for the petitioners. August 31, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?