((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.549 OF 2006 Smt.Taniya Virendrasingh Khauja Applicant versus Union of India and another Respondents Tushar Kale for Uday P. Warunjikar for applicant. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, APP Mr.D.N.Salvi for respondent no.1 Union of India CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 18th September 2006 PC : 1. This application for bail has been rendered infructuous because the applicant, who had applied for bail before the Special Judge, NDPS Court, Pune, is already shown as an accused in the charge sheet which is filed with the Special Judge, NDPS Court, at Delhi. Shri Salvi appearing for respondent no.2 states that the applicant who is an accused there, had applied for discharge and the Special Judge, NDPS, Patiyala House Courts, New Delhi had by an order passed on the Discharge Application on 7th August 2006, discharged the applicant from the said ((-2-)) case. Thus, the applicant is neither an accused before the Special Judge, Pune and the Special Judge, NDPS Court, New Delhi has already discharged him. Either which way, this application has become infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)