IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33987 of 2008 MUKESH PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 5.9.2008 Heard. The petitioner was caught at the spot while attempting to run away after having committed theft of Rs.10,000/- that the informant had withdrawn from the bank after cutting his bag. The money was also recovered from the petitioner. The contention is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated on account of some dispute with the informant but as a matter of fact the FIR indicates as if the informant may not be knowing the present petitioner from before. Considering the facts of the case that the petitioner was caught and the money was recovered from his possession, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Petition is dismissed. As soon as the petitioner completes one year of his custody, the learned A.C.J.M. Dalsingsarai shall release him on bail in connection with Dalsingsarai P.S.Case no.110 of 2008 to his own satisfaction. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )