IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31124 of 2010 ANIL SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 04.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Allegation is that petitioner along with 3-4 others went with informant’s son who did not come back rather his dead body was recovered. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in course of investigation, a different story came in picture that one Birju, own brother of the deceased, his uncle, Ram Pravesh and Dhila Paswan really killed the deceased as he was to receive the amount of L.I.C. of his deceased’s father. Final form exonerating petitioner from liability is submitted and then only cognizance is taken. Taking that into consideration, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 51 of 2007 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Danapur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)