IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2988 of 2011. Decided on: 12th May, 2011. Raksha Devi. ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and anr. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “(i) That the respondents may kindly be directed to count the adhoc/tenure period of service rendered by the petitioner for fixation of pay by allowing her all the increments from the date of her initial appointment as per the law settled by this Hon’ble Court in CWP (T) No.7712 of 2008 decided on 19.5.2009, Uma Dutt Sharma vs. State and the period may also be counted towards pensionary benefits asdecided in LPA No. 36/10 titled Sita Ram vs. State. (ii) That the respondents may be directed to grant the benefit of adhoc service of the petitioner for the purpose of fixation of his seniority.” 2. It is submitted that the issue is covered by the judgment of this Court in Paras Ram vs. State of H.P., CWP (T) No.7712 of 2008 decided on 19.5.2009 (Latest HLJ 2 2009 (HP) 887), which has been implemented also. If that be so, there is no point in discriminating the petitioner in case the petitioner is similarly situated as the petitioner covered by the judgment, referred to above. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as follows: 3. In the event of the petitioner filing a representation within a period of one month from today before the first respondent, the said respondent will consider the same in the light of the judgment, referred to above and in case the petitioner is similarly situated as the petitioner in the judgment referred to above, the petitioner herein also shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits. The needful in this regard and also disbursing the benefits shall be done within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment referred to above by the petitioner. 4. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 12th May, 2011. ( Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr) Judge.