IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15381 of 2008 Ramayan Ojha Versus State Of Bihar ----------- 5 12.09.2011 This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C is directed against the order dated 07.03.08 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C- V Chhapra, passed in Sessions Trial No. 78/92 whereby allowing the application of the prosecution however, under Section 340 CR.P.C. The learned Sessions Judge order for inquiry regarding manipulation of the date in the injury report. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that after framing the charge on 4.3.94 case is pending for disposal and the prosecution party by giving the frivolous petitions tried to linger the trial and to harass the petitioner. Only with a view to linger the trial the prosecution party has also filed under Section 340 CR.P.C for initiating the proceeding under Section 340 CR.P.C. On perusal of the impugned order it appears that on behalf of the prosecution the application was filed under Section 340 Cr.P.C for initiating the proceeding regarding the manipulation of the date in the inquiry report. The date of 2 examination of the injured is on 21.3.1991 in injury report while the photocopy of the injury report as produced on behalf of the prosecution the date of examination of the injured was 1.3.91. Accordingly the learned Sessions Judge feels about inquiry coming to the conclusion what is correct date of examination of injury and also about manipulation of date and accordingly order to inquire the matter. It is not appeared from the impugned order that proceeding has been stayed through the impugned order. Moreover there is nothing in the impugned order to show the abuse of the process of the court. In the result the application is dismissed. Namita ( Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)