IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 519 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 344 OF 2002 SANDEEP AZRENKAR AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 52 ORS., ... Respondents Ms. Norma Alvares,Advocate for the applicants. Ms. S. Vaidya, Advocate for the respondent Nos. 9,15,17 and 52. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate for the P. Talaulikar, Additional Government Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3,7. Mr. J. Godinho, Advocate for the respondent No.6. Coram:- S.B. DESHMUKH & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 20th July, 2009 P.C. Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. The Counsel for the applicants, has pointed out to us page 486, page 492 from Volume No.(2) and the learned Advocate General has also pointed out page No.499. All pages are, in relation to minutes of the Meetings of the Committee. The learned Counsel, who appears for the respondent No.6, submits that reply in response to the writ petition, is filed by him. After hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, in our view, this application can be considered favourably since the learned Advocate General Mr. Kantak made a statement on instructions that he will replace the correct copy of the minutes of the meetings concerned from the record. The statement made by the Advocate General is accepted and taken on record. 2. The application is partly allowed and disposed of. S.B. DESHMUKH, J. U. D. SALVI, J. SMA