IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.790 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.790 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.790 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1976 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1976 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1976 OF 2006 Yokogawa Electric Corporation ...Applicant vs. M/s.Silgate Technologies Pvt.Ltd. & ors. ...Respondents Mr.Subodh Desai for the Applicant Mr.K.G.Menon, Sr.Adv. i/b M/s.Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe for the Respondents CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : DECEMBER 1,2006. : DECEMBER 1,2006. : DECEMBER 1,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Shri Desai for the Applicant. The prayer in this Application is for vacating interim relief granted by this Court on 18th May 2006. In the alternative, a prayer is made for fixing an early date of hearing of the main Application. 2. Criminal Application No.1976 of 2006 has been filed for challenging the order passed by the learned Magistrate of issuing process. The said order has been confirmed in revision. This court has already issued rule and admitted the Application for final hearing. Considering the nature of the controversy involved in the Application, interim relief cannot be vacated. Hence, prayer for vacating interim is rejected. 3.So far as prayer for fixing an early date of hearing is concerned, there are very old Appeals and Applications pending in this Court for final hearing. No case is made out for giving a priority over very old matters considering the fact that the Application arises out of a private complaint alleging commission of offence of defamation. Hence, Application is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE