FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. District : Dhule Civil Application No. 7377 of 2009 (In First Appeal Stamp No. 13528/2009) (Punj Lloyd Ltd., New Delhi Vs. M/s. Kisan Cement Pipes & Allied Industries, Dhule) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................. Mr. Sandeep S. Deshmukh, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Mukul Kulkarni, Advocate, for the respondent. .............................................................................. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 24TH JULY 2009 1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 7 days caused in filing the First Appeal. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the delay is not at all properly explained and, therefore, vehemently opposes the application for condonation of delay. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders 3. In paragraph 6 of the application, the applicant has submitted that the Head Office of the applicant, which is a Company, is situated at Delhi and certain time was required to seek opinion from the Legal Advisor of the Company. It is further submitted that the proposal was required to be routed through various departments of the Company and some time was taken for approval for making the amount available for court fees. 4. Taking into consideration the grounds raised in the application, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned. ( N.D. DESHPANDE ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE bgp/ca7377