CR No. 7345 of 2011 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CR No. 7345 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 30.11.2011 Savitri Devi ....Petitioner Vs. Ramesh and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL ****** Present:- Mr. P.R. Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) This petition assails the order dated 05.10.2011 (Annexure P-2) passed by the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Narnaul, allowing the appeal filed by the plaintiff- respondent No.1 (hereinafter referred as 'the plaintiff') against the dismissal of his injunction application passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Narnaul, vide order dated 23.08.2011. The first Appellate Court has specifically recorded in its order dated 05.10.2011 that plaintiff-Ramesh (now respondent) is not in exclusive possession over the suit property. At the same time, the Court has ordered only to maintain status quo with regard to possession over the suit property as it exists today. As such, with the aforesaid clarification, the interference in the impugned order is not made out. CR No. 7345 of 2011 (O&M) 2 It is further made clear that the expression of opinion made by the first Appellate Court or the trial Court in the orders passed in applications under Order 40 Rule 1 and Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC, would not be binding upon the trial, while deciding it on merits. Disposed of accordingly. (A.N.JINDAL) November 30, 2011 JUDGE ajp