Farad Continuation Sheet No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3994 OF 2008 (DR. MALOJIRAO NAMDEORAO PAWAR Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTH.) ________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Shri Sunil V. Manohar, Advocate for applicant. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 18, 2008. 1. Notice. 2. Shri K.S. Dhote, learned A.P.P. waives notice. 3. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.P.P. 4. This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing orders passed by the learned Judicial magistrate First Class, Seloo below applications Exh.82 and 89, whereby the learned Magistrate rejected the application for permanent exemption from personal appearance in the case. The applicant is accused No.6 in the case. The learned counsel for the applicant states that several other accused persons were absconding and therefore, the case could not make any progress. 5. The applicant undertakes to furnish local surety in the sum of Rs. Ten Thousand before the learned Magistrate. He is represented by an Advocate before the learned Magistrate. He would not question his identification on any date on which he remains absent before the Court and therefore, his personal appearance at the hearing can be dispensed with before the learned Magistrate. 6. In view of this, the impugned orders are set aside. 7. The learned Magistrate shall reconsider the question of dispensing with personal appearance of the applicant at the hearing before him on the above conditions, which are fair and reasonable and would ensure speedy trial. 8. The learned Magistrate shall decide the applications afresh. 9. Cri. Application No.3944/2008 stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE RR.