^' t k fl, _^I •"•^< IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBILASPUR (CHHATnSGASHt WRIT pEn"noN NO. l ^>7- /•aees; PETI'HONER: M/s Kanker Roadways (registered ^ partnership finii) Through Managing partner PreetarnSm^-i ..-•'jb-Garcha, S/o Late Jogendar Singh Garcha, ••"?/'-"••** io*° y-""IUV-"'' ^ed about 57 years, residence ofCivil Line, iot> A"$r' ..•• Raipur, Chhattisgarh. '•••'M*l.{'' .••' ^<i'''.^to'-'"' VERSUS ^•~~^>^ ^y ^<L_ s^feofr<:^^°^^r'yk^- ^espondents: ^ "2L State Transport Appeilate Tribunal^ ^cupa&^ 1 c-.o>-. -^ , ^*^> ^ ^. R.T.A., Chhattisgarh.a't- f^f\^a^ Secretary, R.T.A., Jagdalpur. ^ . Manish Travels, Properiotor Manish Jain, residence of Bus Stand, Durg, Chhattisgarh. crt;-- jf^- ^f .. ->.° 3?-' /^} .^ Ve WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 QETHE CONSTITUTION OF mDIA. XI-HC-78 3n^rwR-fi+ (CT"3<l^lsht|i+ * / k-/^-. *TT»-IC^r SbHKh 3ST '^WM'f, 9-^WW, Rcilti^ ^^'^.:£.:(.^.J.3?..^ 200:) 3<i^l ^iach (y^'5!^) gRITWfff^cT-W^T Shri A. M. Tiwari, lean- Shri Sanjay S. A State/I'espondent. This petition is dB-e< March 2006 passed ni R| application of tlie responde^ revision lias been allowed. Having heard learned perusal of the impugned or^ that delav ia filing fhe revisil eiTor ia passing the mterference bv fhis Court wqfcpftr iiraciY ff fei^t <RRZR ^sri^iTan^T .ed counsel for fhe petitioner. grawal, leamed G.A. for the |ted agamst the order dated 20t11 :vision No. 384/04 whereby fhe tit for condoutng delav ia filing the 'ounsel for the petitioner aad after ^er, I ani of the considei^d opinion bn has been condoned bv tlie Coiirt ida below after assigning reaso4s, as such fliere is no jurisdictional ii^lpugned order which warrants vhile exercising jurisdiction vested underArticle 226 ofthe Coilistitution oflndia. Accordiagly, tlie petition deserves to be disijiissed at tlie admission stage itself and is herebv disraissed. Sd/- Dhu'endra Mishra Judge P.T.O.