IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.586 of 2010 SRI CHANDRASHEKHAR PRASAD THE THEN DEPUTY COLLECTOR (DEVELOPMENT) I/C BANKA, SON OF LATE BALDEO MAHTO, RESIDENT OF KHUSHAKHAT, P.S. DARBE BHADAUR, DISTRICT- PATNA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CABINET VIGILANCE DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA ******** 2 19.01.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and Mr. Arvind Kumar, Special P.P. appearing for the Vigilance. The prayer of the petitioner is for quashing of the Vigilance P.S. Case No. 115 of 2009 registered for the alleged offences under sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477A, 109 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 13(2), 13(1)(d) and 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. It is submitted that on perusal of the first information report it would appear that no offence is made out and as such the F.I.R. deserves to be quashed. Learned counsel for the Vigilance, on the other hand, submits that on perusal of the F.I.R. it would appear that the allegations are there for committing the alleged offences. Considering the submissions of the parties, this Court is not expressing any opinion with regard to the commission of the alleged offences, however it goes without saying that as the alleged offence is of the year 1993 and the F.I.R. has been registered in the year 2009, it is expedient in the interest of justice that the investigation of the case be completed expeditiously without unnecessary delay. The writ application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)