IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 519 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO. 444 OF 2006 Narendra Jagdish Agrawal ... Plaintiff Versus Martin Francis D’mello & Ors. ... Defendants Mr. G.R.Mishra i/b. M/s. Ashoka Law Firm for Plaintiff. Mr. A.T.Marques for Defendant No.1. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. DATE : 7th March, 2007 DATE : 7th March, 2007 DATE : 7th March, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiffs states that evidence is being led in the Land Acquisition Reference and, therefore, he does not press the Notice of Motion. The Notice of Motion is disposed of as not pressed. -- (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.)