IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Letters Patent Appeal No.191 of 2007 Letters Patent Appeal No.191 of 2007 Letters Patent Appeal No.191 of 2007 in in in Writ Petition 4740 of 2007. Writ Petition 4740 of 2007. Writ Petition 4740 of 2007. Menon Pistons Limited ..Appellant versus Prakash A. Chougule & Anr. ..Respondents alongwith alongwith alongwith Letters Patent Appeal No.236 2007 Letters Patent Appeal No.236 2007 Letters Patent Appeal No.236 2007 in in in Writ Petition 4856 of 2007. Writ Petition 4856 of 2007. Writ Petition 4856 of 2007. alongwith alongwith alongwith Letters Patent Appeal No.237 of2007 Letters Patent Appeal No.237 of2007 Letters Patent Appeal No.237 of2007 in in in Writ Petition 4861 of 2007. Writ Petition 4861 of 2007. Writ Petition 4861 of 2007. alongwith alongwith alongwith Letters Patent Appeal No.238 of 2007 Letters Patent Appeal No.238 of 2007 Letters Patent Appeal No.238 of 2007 in in in Writ Petition 4842 of 2007. Writ Petition 4842 of 2007. Writ Petition 4842 of 2007. alongwith alongwith alongwith Letters Patent Appeal No.239 of 2007 Letters Patent Appeal No.239 of 2007 Letters Patent Appeal No.239 of 2007 in in in Writ Petition 5027 of 2007. Writ Petition 5027 of 2007. Writ Petition 5027 of 2007. Mr.Abhay Nevaji i/b. M/s. Paras Kuhad & Associates for the appellants. Shri K.S. Bapat i/b. Shri Avinash S. Fatangane for the respondent. Coram : Swatanter Kumar, C.J. & Coram : Swatanter Kumar, C.J. & Coram : Swatanter Kumar, C.J. & J.P. Devadhar, J. J.P. Devadhar, J. J.P. Devadhar, J. Dated : 15th January, 2008 Dated : 15th January, 2008 Dated : 15th January, 2008 P.C. -2- 1. This appeal was admitted by Order dated 20.11.2007. The other four LPA’s are for hearing. However, no common order of notice/admission was passed by the Court in those cases. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the parties, during the course of hearing of these appeals have stated that the parties have arrived at settlement and they have filed five separate consent terms in each of the LPA. For the purpose of identification these consent terms are marked "X" to "X-4". They are signed by the counsel appearing for the parties. The parties are also present in the Court. The Counsel for the parties pray that the appeals be disposed of in terms of the consent terms. Consequently, each of the L.P.A. is disposed of in terms of the Consent terms marked "X’ to X-4" which shall form part of the Order. 3. Parties are left to bear their own costs. ( Chief Justice.) ( Chief Justice.) ( Chief Justice.) (J.P.Devadhar, J.) (J.P.Devadhar, J.) (J.P.Devadhar, J.) -3-