£-/^ ' c e.^^, T...^C?"^i^.&-) ^s^^^s^ daUid--"" (^ . ^l^ IN THEHIGH COUSTOF CWMXTISGASHAT BILASPUR IpgleBench WRIT PETITION (S) No.: ^tfeS^ t0 6 Petitioner: Smt. Usha Lata Tripathi,^ W/o Dr.A.K, Tripathi, aged abovt 50 years, LeGtui'er, District IilstituteofEducatfon and Training (DIET) : Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS' Respondentis (1) StateofChliattisgarh / Througb The Secretary, School Education Department, DRS, Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) Director of Publie Instructions»'< Statp ofChhattisgarh, Raipiir (C.G.) (3) Prinoipal, PQBTcollege, Shat-iltOf^ Nagar, Raipur (C.O.) (4) Principal,DistrictIristituteof.^ Education and Trainin^ (DrET) Mahasamimd C.G. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF WDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS AND ,BIRECTIC3NS. ORDE&S IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND GERtlORARIS. -i;J<. s%:v fflSH COURTOFCHHATnsSARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(s)No. 4834 of 2006 Petitioner Smt. Usha Lata Tripdthi Verais Req»ondents Stateof Chhatt-isgarh A others Sirgle Bench: Hon'bleAfcr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. ^ Shri AAonoj bubey, Advoaicte for the Petitioner. Shri Ajay &wivedi,Panel lawyerfor-riieiteqiondents/State. O R D E R ^ith September,2006) 1. Leamed counsel appearin9 for the petitiorier submits that while working as Upper Division Teacher, the petitiener has gone on troining to improvehis qualifications on his own ex(»nsesand acquired B. Ed. Certificate on 29.6.1981 from Pt. RavishankoB' Vishwavidhyalaya, Raipur. 2. According to leamed counsel for •the petitioner, •the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of'the decision of this Court in the case of Yadiwant Kumar Bhdradwaj Vs. Municipal CQrporation, burg ond ano'ther {2006 (fS) AAPJR-C6 96}. : . •:. / .•':.. 3. Leamed counsel fo^ the petitipner furthersubmits that the factsond question of kw» involve jn the present case are [j^ggg "M,, squarety covered by decision of this Court in the case of Yashwcnt Kumar Bharndwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, &urg and another (Supra), to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents fairly concedes and agrees with the averment made by leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner. 4. Accordin9ly, the writpetition isallowed in terms of the order passed in the case of YadiwontKumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal \ . Corporation, Durg and ano'ther (Supra). No order as to costs. Bablu Sd/- SatishK.AgnihotTi Judge a