IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.762 of 2006 DEO SHANKAR CHAUDHARY Versus MOST.TULSI DEVI & ORS ----------- 6. 7.7.2010 This case has been brought under the heading ‘to be mentioned’ at the instance of the counsel for the petitioner. Counsel points out that at page 2 of the order in 1st paragraph the provision of law has been wrongly typed as Order 23 Rule 10A C.P.C. which should have been Order 23 Rule 3A C.P.C. Counsel is absolutely correct, inasmuch as the same is purely typographical error. That being so, the order of this Court dated 10.12.2008 at page 2 in the 1st paragraph in 4th- 5th line will be read as Order 23 Rule 3A C.P.C. in place of Order 23 Rule 10A C.P.C. The order of this Court dated 10.12.2008 in C.R.No. 762/2006 would stand modified to the aforementioned extent. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/