1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2348/1996 Smt. Sunder Devi. vs. State of Rajasthan and others. Date : 18.3.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.PR Bhanwaria, for the petitioner. Mr.Anil Bachhawat, for the respondents. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the parties. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of the Government's decision dated 25.1.1992, the petitioner was entitled to selection grades on completion of 9 years which is first selection grade, then on completion of 18 years, second selection grade and on completion of 27 years, third selection grade. The petitioner has not been granted second and third selection grades. The respondents submitted reply to the writ petition and stated that the order of the Government dated 25.1.1992 was further clarified vide order dated 3.4.1993 (Annex.R/1). It is also submitted that whenever promotion is offered to 2 the employee and he refused to accept that promotion, then such employee is not entitled to selection grade. In this case, the petitioner was given first selection grade and when she was offered promotion, she refused by her letter dated 29.1.1982, copy of which is placed on record as Annex.R/2. The petitioner then retired in the year 1995. The circulars of the Government under consideration are of 1992 and 1993. The fact that the petitioner was offered promotion has not been denied inspite of the fact that copy of letter written by the petitioner has been placed on record. In view of the above reasons, I do not find any merit in this writ petition. Consequently, this writ petition is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya