1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 172/07 IN S.B.CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 676/2007 (Deva Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 17/8/2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. K.R.Choudhary for the petitioner. Mr. V.R.Mehta Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and public prosecutor for the State. Perused the judgment and order impugned passed by the appellate court as well as by the trial court and the record of the trial court. In my view, there is an arguable law point involved in the instant revision petition. Admit. Issue notice. Mr. V.R.Mehta P.P. accepts notice on behalf of State. Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application for suspension of sentence. Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, looking to the short sentence and the fact that revision petition has already been admitted and not likely to come up for hearing in near future, I think it just and proper to suspend the substantive sentence of imprisonment awarded to the accused petitioner-applicant. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 397/401 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the substantive sentence of imprisonment passed by the trial court and affirmed 2 by the learned Sessions Judge, Balotra, district Barmer vide judgment dt. 22.6.2007 in Criminal Appeal No.45/2006 against petitioner-applicant Deva Ram S/o Shri Chena Ram shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid revision provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before this court on 18/9/2007 and whenever ordered to do so with the incorporation in the bond that as and when he will shift his place of residence, he will intimate to this Court and his lawyer about his new place of residence. (H.R.PANWAR),J. rp