CR.RA/527/2007 1/3 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 527 of 2007 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= TRIVENIBEN JITENDRABHAI RATHOD - Applicant(s) Versus JITENDRAKUMAR LAXMANBHAI RATHOD & 1 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR HARSHIT S TOLIA for Applicant(s) : 1, MR AV Rashinkkar for Mr. MG NAGARKAR for Respondent(s) : 1, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) : 2, ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER Date : 19/03/2008 ORAL JUDGMENT Mr. Tolia for the applicant submitted that a settlement between the parties has been arrived at and therefore he does not intend to CR.RA/527/2007 2/3 JUDGMENT and desire to press this application and under and as per instructions of his client wants to withdraw the same. He has produced a copy of document dated 13.3.2008 purporting to be the settlement between the present applicant and respondent No.1. Mr. A.V. Rashinkkar for Mr. Nagarkar appearing for respondent No.1 is present in the Court and admits the factum about the settlement and states under and as per the instructions of his client that he has no objection if Mr. Tolia is permitted to withdraw the Criminal Revision Application. 2. The present Criminal Revision Application has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 23.7.2007 passed by Additional Sessions Judge and Fast Track Judge, Junagadh in Criminal Revision Application No. 78 of 2006. 3. In view of the aforesaid statement and submission of Mr. Tolia and in light of the fact that Mr. Nagarkar, Advocate for the respondent CR.RA/527/2007 3/3 JUDGMENT No.1 and Ms. Falguni Patel, APP appearing for respondent No.2 have no objection against the withdrawal of the application, the permission as prayed for is granted. The Criminal Revision Application No. 527 of 2007 stands disposed of as not pressed and withdrawn. Rule is discharged. [ K.M. Thaker, J. ] rmr.