IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 18TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 27TH BHADRA 1930 Mat.Appeal.No. 358 OF 2008 ---------------------------- OP.926/2005 OF FAMILY COURT, KOTTARAKKARA APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 2 & 3 --------------------------------------------- 1. VIJAYAN, GIRESH BHAVAN, PADOM, PATHANAPURAM, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 2. SULOCHANA, W/O.VIJAYAN, GIRESH BHAVAN, PADOM, PATHANAPURAM, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.ABDUL RAZZAK RESPONDENTS: PETITIONERS AND IST RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. BINDU R., D/O.RADHAMMA, SASIVILASOM, ANCHAL MURI, AYIRANALLOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. BIBIN GIRESH, C/O.BINDU R., D/O.RADHAMMA, SASIVILASOM, ANCHAL MURI, AYIRANALLOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. GIRESH, S/O.VIAJYAN, SASIVILASOM, ANCHAL MURI, AYIRANALLOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL FOR R1,2 THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMAN & T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = C.M. APPLN. 1099/2008 & MAT. APPEAL NO. 358 OF 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2008. J U D G M E N T Raman, J. C.M. Application 1099/2008 is an application for condoning the delay caused in filing the appeal. 2. Heard both sides. Delay is condoned. Since both sides are present we heard them on merits. 3. On going through the order passed by the court below we find that the order passed is only against CPW.1 and not against the appellants herein. As such, the appellants are not persons aggrieved by the said order. Hence the appeal is dismissed. P.R. RAMAN, (JUDGE) T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, (JUDGE) knc/-