IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: February 01, 2011 Crl. Revision No. 2566 of 2010 (O&M) Gian Chand. …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others. … Respondents Crl. Revision No. 2567 of 2010 (O&M) Gian Chand. …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Undisputedly, petition filed by the husband seeking restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act was hotly contested by the wife, daughter of the present revisionist and was ultimately, CRR 2566 of 2010 dismissed. Undisputedly, wife has not filed any divorce petition against the husband. She is neither interested in the divorce nor is interested in living with the husband. Filing of present revision goes to prove that wife and her father, both are interested that husband and his family members should face the criminal trial. Present petition and present prosecution on the face of it seems to be abuse of process of law. In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the view taken by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. Dismissed. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of the connected matter. February 01, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2