1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application No.644 of 2010 In Writ Petition No.959 of 2008 (D) Vijay Umarsi Lodaya and another v. State of Maharashtra and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Dr. Anjan De, Advocate for Applicants/Petitioners. Coram : R.C. Chavan, J. Dated : 3 rd March, 2010 This is an application for recalling the order passed by this Court on 28-1-2009, whereby the writ petition was disposed of. The writ petition was disposed of, because it was believed at that time that an appeal pending before the Deputy Director of Land Records had been dismissed in default. The petitioners were to seek its restoration and then have it heard on merits. It was also clarified that the petitioners would have other remedies available based on the order, which may be passed by the Deputy Director of Land Records in the appeal. The learned counsel for the applicants/petitioners now points out that the appeal was not dismissed in default and was very much pending. If the appeal was pending, it does not require recalling the order dated 28-1-2009, because the order dated 28-1-2009 would have also enabled the petitioners to address the Deputy 2 Director of Land Records on the merits in the appeal, which is pending. The order is not required to be recalled. All the contentions, that would be available to the petitioners, in the petition are kept open should an occasion to agitate their cause arise. The application is, therefore, disposed of. Judge pdl