IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. COCP No. 1838 of 2011. [O&M] Date of Decision: 21st November, 2011. Chetan Singh Petitioner through Mr. Nirmal Singh, Advocate Versus Hussain Lal & Ors. Respondents through Mr. G.S.Cheema, Sr. DAG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] Shri Sawan Iqbal Singh, Assistant Director, o/o the DPI [SE], Punjab, who is present in Court, states that the directions issued by this Court have been complied with and the services rendered by the petitioner in the recognized Government Aided School have been counted towards the qualifying service for the purposes of pensionary benefits. In this view of the matter, these contempt proceedings are disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, however, with a clarificatory direction that the consequential benefits, if any, be paid to the petitioner within a period of three months, failing which the petitioner shall be at liberty to get these proceedings revived. Disposed of. Dasti. Rule discharged. November 21, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE