SW€§W %&¥‘§M§ .w, EL» 3 J; «ww r ~§--tb v " * Q Q) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Wriu’etition No. 9.2.6} /2ods \7 PETITIONER / :/ Laxmi Bai Rajput Aged about 37 years D/o. Keju Singh 85 W/o. Chandrawan Thakur R/o. Vill. Kalegondi, at prcsent R/o. Vill.- Bijabhata, P.S.Kunda Tah. Pandariya,Dist. Kabirdham (C.G.) VERSUS ESPONDENTS /-/ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The s€cretary Home Ministry D.K. S. Building, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) Inspector General of Police Raipur (C.G.) The Collector District -Ra3nandgaon (C.G.) Station House Officer Police Station Gandai, District—Rajnandgaon (C‘G.) ‘ (/5. Girwar, S/o.- Banau afdaJWc ’“fy/BJ? Caste—Shikari, Prakash, S/o. Keju Singh Respondent No.5 to 6 R/o. Vill. Kalegondi, P.S. Gandai Sub-Tahsil Gandai, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) / WRIT PETITION Ul A 226i 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R 15. 6.2 05 Mr. Ashok Mishra, coun;;el for the petitioner. 'or the State. etitioner seeks relief that Station House Mr. Bhaskar Pyasi, RL. g‘ BV this petition the pi Officer, -Poiice $tation~ Gandaii be directed to reg‘ster a criminal case to provide safety to the petitioner and to against respondent No.5 8s 6, seize the paddy taken by resporrient No.5 8s 6. The petitioner’s case is t at he is the owner of land bearing Khasra No.3gj4, 235/3 & 321/2 situ ted in Village Kalegondi, RC. No.14. On 12.7.2004 respondent No.5 \ 6 took away the crop of the petitioner against which he made a com laint to respondent No.4-SHO, Collector 8s Inspector General of Police butl no action has been taken and respondent No.5 8a 6 are continuously looti g the crop of the petitioner. I have heard learned cou sel for the parties. l The petitioner has got e1 icacious alternative remedy to avail and if any criminal act is being c mmitted by respondent No.5 8s 6 and respondent No.4 & police auth rities are not taking any action in that case the petitioner is entitled to mdve concerned Magistrate Court by filing a complaint and request the M g‘sterial Court for directing the police to reg‘ster the case and investig te into the criminal case under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. Even un er Section 200 of the Cr.P.C. the petitioner is entitled to file the complaint. Therefore, in 'the circu petitioner has not been able to jurisdiction of this Court und Accordingly, the petition is liab Consequently; M.(W.)P. / L.C.Bhadoo s stances l am of the opinion that the alto out a ease for invoking extraordinary Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia . to he dismissed and same is dismissed. o. 18 19/05 also stands dismissed. /, t. XI-HC-zz WW, sew how wP% [9.3g 200 m WWHFEH ' mmt‘wm