- 1 - 222,11 rng IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 222 OF 2011 Pramod Mishra & 5 ors .. Applicants vs 1. State of Maharashtra & anr..Respondents Mr.Junaid Shabwaaref for Applicants Ms.M.R.Tidke APP for Respondent-State Mr.Ravi Dwivedi for Respt no.2 Parties present in court CORAM: N.D.DESHPANDE, J DATE: 6th April, 2011 PER COURT 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. None of applicants are present because of no fear of arrest or false prosecution by the police. No case is made out for quashing of the alleged FIR which came to be registered in the past on a complaint of Sidra Sohel Vohra who is present in court as respondent no.2 with her husband Sohel Vora. It is stated that the complainant-respondent no.2 - 2 - 222,11 Sidra got married with Sohel Vora which was registered in February 2008 with the Registrar of Marriages, Marriage office, Mumbai at Exhibit C dated 5.2.2011. She also submitted that once upon a time she had fear from her own parents and in-laws whose names have been figured in FIR for seeking protection when she eloped with Sohel Vora. Now there is no such case to inquire into for further course of action. The FIR becomes a history. 2. It is also seen from the record that all these facts with documents have been informed to the police and that is why the police did not take any action. Therefore, purpose is served. This Criminal Application therefore, is totally misconceived and is dismissed with costs of Rs.500/-. Statement is made by APP that after they had received the correspondence,they did not make further - 3 - 222,11 inquiries and accepted the said correspondence of the complainant-respondent no.2. Application disposed of. (N.D.Deshpande,J)