IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21195 of 2011 Birendra Das Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 3 13.10.2011 Heard counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that save and except suspicion there is no material in the case diary but circumstance appearing in course of investigation appears more than suspicion only as in the night of the incident deceased left Kalam’s Tailoring Shop where deceased was working for two days along with this petitioner and others. In the F.I.R., petitioner has been shown Birendra Mandal son of Jageswar Mandal which is one of the grounds for bail on the point of involvement but that is later clarified that petitioner was the real person with whom deceased has left Kalam’s Tailoring Shop along with Sanjay Kumar Mandal and one other. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submission of the parties, prayer for bail on behalf of petitioner is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)