IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 14TH JANUARY 2011 / 24TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1314 of 2011(L) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- D.KRISHNANKUTTY NAIR, KRISHNABHAVAN, KAMUKINCODU, KARIAVATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, WORKING AS PASS EXAMINER, TRANSPORT WING, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, KARIAVATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.SUJESH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. 3. THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. SHRI M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.1314/2011-L ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 14th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner herein has been working as Pass Examiner in the service of the University of Kerala. He joined as a Class IV employee on 18/09/1979. He was promoted to the post of Conductor on 19/12/1996 in a leave vacancy and, thereafter, he was working in a permanent post of Conductor with effect from 01/09/1998 onwards. He had been drawing salary in the post of Conductor along with revised pay. Later, he was granted grade promotion also from 01/04/2006 and his pay was refixed. The petitioner's complaint in regard to the alleged irregularity in the fixation of pay resulted in Ext.P1 order being passed. According to the petitioner, in spite of the promotion to the post of Pass Examiner, the pay scale of the petitioner has not been refixed by the respondents. In these circumstances, he filed Exts.P2 and P3 representations before the University . W.P.(C). No.1314/2011 -:2:- 2. The petitioner prays that the University may be directed to take a decision on the representations without further delay. 3. The learned Standing Counsel for the University submitted that a decision will be taken in accordance with law. There will be a direction to the competent among the respondents to take a decision on the representations submitted by the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE