CWP(T) No. 7069 of 2008 25.11.2010 Present: Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.M. Bisht, Dy. A.G., for the respondents/State. CMP(T) No. 510 of 2010 For the reasons set out in the application, the application is allowed. Petition is restored to its original number. CWP(T) No. 7069 of 2008 In this petition, petitioner has prayed for salary for the vacation period to which similarly situated employees have been held entitled too by the Division Bench of this Court in Baldev Singh and others versus State of H.P. and others, CWP No. 415 of 2000, decided on 1st September, 2008. There is no dispute that the petitioner had served the respondents for the period in question. It also cannot be disputed that the ratio of the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in Baldev Singh (Supra) is applicable in the instant petition. Consequently, it is directed that the directions issued in Baldev Singh (Supra), with regard to the salary payable for the period of vacation shall also apply to the instant case. Consequential action be taken within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment, failing which thereafter petitioner shall be entitled to the interest @ 9% per annum. It is always open for the petitioner to make representation to the respondents with regard to his other entitlements. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. November 25, 2010, (Sanjay Karol), J. (vs)