RSA No. 4874 of 2009(O& M) Ravinder Pal Singh vs. Pershan Singh Mann Present: Mr.G.S.Bhatia, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.L.S.Bhangoo, Advocate for the respondent. *** After arguing for sometime learned counsel for the appellant states that in case time is granted to the appellant to vacate the premises he would not press this appeal. Learned counsel for the respondent states that in the circumstances of the case a period of six months is more than sufficient. However, learned counsel for the appellant is praying that since this is a matter of running business , a period of 1 ½ years be granted. In my opinion it would be in the interest of justice if the appellant is granted time of one year to vacate the premises. This would be subject to the fact that payment of arrears of rent, if any, is made within one week from today and thereafter w.e.f. April, 2010 the appellant pays an amount of Rs. 11,000/- per month as charges for use and occupation. The amount to be paid for the month of April, 2010 shall be paid on or before 25.03.2010 and similarly the amount to be paid for every successive month shall be paid in advance by 25th of the previous month. This proposal has been accepted by learned counsel for the respondent. Let the appellant file the necessary undertaking in this Court within one week. It is made clear that any default would render the decree being liable for execution immediately and the appellant would be liable for being charged under the Contempt of Court. As long as the appellant adheres to this agreement the execution of the impugned decree shall remain stayed. With this modification the appeal is dismissed. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE March 15, 2010 sunita