1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER (1) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8886/09 Smt. Renu Hingad & ors. vs. The State of Raj. & ors. (2) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8872/09 Hari Ram & ors. vs. The State of Raj. & ors. (3) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8897/09 Rewat Singh & ors. vs. The State of Raj. & ors. (4) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8903/09 Hans Raj & ors. vs. The State of Raj. & ors. (5) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8904/09 Manchha Ram & ors. vs. The State of Raj. & ors. (6) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8905/09 Lavji Damor & ors. vs. The State of Raj. & ors. (7) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8915/09 Chaukha Ram & ors. vs. The State of Raj. & ors. (8) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8916/09 Sunil Kumar Sharma & ors. vs. The State of Raj. & ors. (9) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8918/09 Om Prakash vs. The State of Raj. & ors. (10) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8920/09 Keshri Chand Saran & ors. vs. The State of Raj. & ors. (11) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8923/09/09 Pratap Singh & ors. vs. The State of Raj. & ors. 2 (12) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8926/09 Khyali Lal & ors. vs. The State of Raj. & ors. (13) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8927/09 Arvind Kumar & ors. vs. The State of Raj. & ors. (14) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8933/09 Suresh Kumar Goyal & ors.vs. The State of Raj. & ors. (15) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8934/09 Rasal Kanwar vs. The State of Raj. & ors. (16) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8935/09 Ganpat Ram Jakhar & ors.vs. The State of Raj. & ors. (17) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8282/09 Rajendra Choudhary & anr. vs. The State of Raj. & ors. (18) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8657/09 Anil Kumar & ors. vs. The State of Raj.& ors. Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Date of Order:- September 11,2009. PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PRAKASH TATIA Servashri PP Choudhary, BS Deora, Narendra Gehlot, VN Kalla, KC Choudhary, Usman Ghani, Sukesh Bhati, AK Choudhary, Sajjan Singh, JK Bhaiya, Prakash Bhati, RS Choudhary, JVS Deora, PRS Udawat, HR Chawla, Ravindra Singh,Ajai Vyas, AR Godara, KR Choudhary, Sandeep Saruparia and Sunil Ranwha for the petitioners. 3 Mr. Rajesh Bhati for Mr. RL Jangid, Addl. Advocate General for the State of Raj. ... The learned counsels for the petitioners submits that they have already supplied the copy of the writ petition to Shri R.L.Jagdid, Addl. Advocate General. The learned counsel for the parties submit that the issue raised in this writ petition has already been decided on 15.5.2009 by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2579/2009-Devendra Kumar & ors. v. State of Raj. & ors and other connected writ petition, therefore, these writ petitions may also be disposed of in the light of the directions given in the above referred decision. Therefore, these writ petitions are also disposed of with the same directions as given in the said decision which are as under:- I. During continuation of the work, as detailed out hereinabove, the invocation of the last extension is arbitrary and illegal; and the consequential automatic termination orders of the petitioners are set aside. II. The RPSC/DPC selected candidates/employees are still not available and next academic sessions is about to start; 4 even urgent temporary appointments under Rule 28 of the Rules of 1971 are not possible due to short span of one month and a half left to start with the process of admission and academic session, therefore, as per the aims and objects of the Scheme, respondents are directed to consider the cases of the petitioners for continuation in service till regularly selected candidates from RPSC/persons selected and recommended by the DPC for promotion are made available in the light of the above observations; III. Even in case of appropriate order of continuation in service till regularly selected candidates from RPSC/DPC selected persons are available, the petitioners are not entitled for wages of the vacations, in other words, when the schools are closed. IV. In case the regularly selected candidates from RPSC/persons selected and recommended by the DPC for promotion are made available, then the respondents can terminate services of the petitioners after preparation of the seniority list on the State level as per their date of appointment and merit assigned to 5 them, by following the principle of 'last come first go' to the extent of availability of the selected candidates and while doing so, the respondents will keep the interest of the present students and prospective students in view.” (PRAKASH TATIA)J mlt.