-" '•r/ 3 SINGLE.5STCH -^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPURfC.G.l WRIT PETITION NO.^A^< 72005 t PETITIONER ^ Nagendra Pratap Singh, aged; - ..-"^^ about 49 years, sonof Shri Lucky )^v ^A.^' ' _. • '.. '. ' . ' ' • ;' r ":'.'-'.::;^':'1 ':'^':^:^;J _^y-<<'^^'' ..^* Singh, resident of Janjgir, Distdct K''"''.'^S^.'"''''' Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh) ^.^s^' ^^1^' ''^"" RESPONDENTS Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Its Secretary, Department of Road Transport, Dau Katyan Smgh Bhawan, Raipur, C.G. ^>" •-, ^ <..-' o^i" (^py^^2- The Kegional Transport Officer, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ^3. The Assistant Transport Commissioner ChhattisgaLrti, Raipur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRN' JN THE ^fATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE WRIT OR WRITS. ORDER OR ORDERS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. L-1L,_:_^'1^5^ XI-HC-22 3TT^T^T f^lN)3TI^T ^moF^cf ^w^ \--- Bc^d ^ 7S[ ^qNj^iq, ^Tfl^^Ko, fa^ll^y 311^1 ^5|Cft i.8 ^l^l^ll $b^l^ ..^.?^.,^.^ ,.,^ 3:n^T?^TTW^1N 1. o Shri Alok Bakshi, Shri U.N.S. Deo, Govtl Shri J.L. Paikra, R.T.q Heard counse] The of the pet| Nc..C.G.-10-A/'2685 was 2004 on th^ ground of non»^ petitioner rnoved for entire of tax but thi rejected the appjlcatlon oour1©©ifor tho potjtionor. Advooaie for the State/resDonderite. h, Bilaspur is present in the Court. for the partles. :|tioner is that his truck bearlng registration by the Transport Department on 27-2" ^aym^ni of tax. Aftor paymont of tax, tho wltH &y Tax Authority, bup has fjied It is positior^ ^nd tho ^eteurQ momo under the provjsion©| wlth -Section 207 of the M.V. | tax has pald, tr| to the Police Station !n the circumstance^ if not otherwlse With thc djrection Consequentjy, i\4.(W.)| Partjesareentstiedforl cbi^I<n41<i w^it'^ te^<fa<^i< ^3l1^TW^T k^ ^the vehicle and the Detitioner deposjted the i^ venicie is not bejng The C.J.M. the obsen/atlon that the vehicle can be the R.T.O. is not the vehicle. ^n of that the outetanding tax h^s Annoxuro-P/1 aJso shows that tho vehicio was |of 16 (3) of the Road Tax Agt read lAct and handed over to tne Poiice. Since tne lerefore, the Transport Department is requlred thatthe tax has beers ^ _JL.js directed that the vehjcie may be ^ ^r^ r-^rW £^4^_ - reqsjjjred afor^sald, the petition disposed oi s. No.2701/2005 aiso stands dlsposed of. ^ertifjed copy ofthis order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge