IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-21675 of 2009 Date of decision:26.10.2009. Gurdeep Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Ms. Ashu Chauhan, Advocate, for Mr. H.S.Rakhra, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. BBS Teji, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Balwinder Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The parties to the impugned prosecution i.e. petitioners and respondent No.2 have arrived at a compromise, the terms and conditions whereof are documented in Annexures P-1 & P-2. Petitioners and respondent No.2 are present in the Court and are identified by their respective counsel. They own up the compounding. They further state that presently there is no dispute subsisting between them. Their joint statement has also been recorded separately. In the larger interest of the society, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.377 dated 20.07.2004 under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC, P.S. Kotwali Bathinda, District Bathinda shall stand quashed on account of compounding. Disposed of accordingly. October 26, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE