1 wp8316-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8316 OF 2010 Abu Sufiyan R. Shaikh and ors. ..Petitioners Vs State of Maharashtra ..Respondents -- Mr.D.S.Sakhalkar i/b.Mr.Swapnil Waradkar, for petitioners. Mr.R.M.Patne, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 5 – State. Mr.Chandra Naik, for respondent no.2. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 2 nd DECEMBER, 2010 P.C: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2] The challenge is to the interim order dated 3 rd August, 2010 passed by the Revisional Authority. Pending the Revision Application under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, by the impugned order, the operation of the order impugned in the Revision Application, is stayed by the Revisional Authority. 2 wp8316-10.sxw 3] A Society was ordered to be registered and the registration certificate was issued on 10 th November, 2006. In appeal, the Divisional Joint Registrar has set aside the registration certificate and has directed the Deputy Registrar to take necessary action of the cancellation of the registration of the Society which was already registered. The said order was challenged before the Revisional Authority and, by the impugned order, the Revisional Authority has stayed the operation of the order of the Appellate Authority till the disposal of the Revision Application. 4] Learned counsel for the petitioners, who are respondents in the Revision Application, invited attention of the Court to the order passed in S.C.Suit No.1589 of 2009. He submitted that the registration of the Society at the instance of the tenants was completely illegal. He submitted that the Revision Application has been filed by the Society which is ordered to be de-registered as well as by the builder with whom the co-owners of the property had no concern. 5] I have given careful consideration to the submission. The Appellate Authority has set aside the order of registration of Society to which the registration certificate was issued on 10 th November, 2006. The order of the Appellate authority was passed on 19 th May, 2010. Pending the hearing of the Revision Application challenging the order of the appellate Authority, the order of stay has been passed. 6] There is no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the Revisional Authority. The observations made in the impugned order 3 wp8316-10.sxw are tentative which will not be binding upon the Revisional Authority at the time of final disposal of the Revision Application. All contentions which are raised by the petitioners in this petition can be always raised at the time of final hearing of the Revision Application. 7] Subject to what is observed above, writ petition is rejected. All contentions of the parties on merits of the Revision Application are kept open. Revision Application shall be decided as expeditiously as possible and, in any event, within three months from the date on which an authenticated copy of this order is produced before the Revisional Authority. [A.S.OKA, J]