Civil Revision No. 855 of 2010(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 855 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: February 18 , 2010 Rubal ...... Petitioner Versus Major Karambir Mahla ...... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.Kamaljeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This petition has been filed against the order declining permission to the petitioner to recall her husband for further cross- examination in a matrimonial dispute between the two. The learned trial Court has found that the counsel for the petitioner has cross-examined the respondent at length. Moreover the applicant did not even disclose what was the nature of the omissions which necessitated a prayer for recalling the witness. I asked learned counsel for the petitioner that even now it could be disclosed as to what were such major omissions in the cross-examination which would render it in the interest of justice to recall the witness but he has not been able to point out anything. Civil Revision No. 855 of 2010(O&M) 2 In the circumstances I am not persuaded to hold that the order passed by the learned trial Court is vitiated with such material irregularity so as to be liable for interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Consequently this revision petition is dismissed. Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc. Applications, if any, stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE February 18, 2010 sunita