KBP 1 cp422-09.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.422 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s order Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr.Amit Shaligram i/b.Mr.S.D.Patil, for petitioner. Mr.Gajanan Shah i/b.Mr.S.K.Srivastava & Co, for respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 13 th December, 2010 P.C. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the contemnor. The assertions made in paragraph 15 and 16 of the reply fled by the contemnor show that substantial compliance is made by the contemnors. If the petitioner has any grievance regarding non receipt of the other benefits, the petitioner will have to adopt appropriate remedy. However, no action can be taken under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. By keeping the remedy of the petitioner open, Contempt Petition is disposed of. [ A.S. OKA, J.]