IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 492 OF 2008 SHRI. RUDOLFO NORONHA ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. HONORATO PINTO AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Zeller D'souza,Advocate for the petitioner. Coram:- C. L. PANGARKAR, J. Date:- 2nd April, 2009 P.C. The Counsel for the petitioner submits that the appeal in which the impugned order was passed, has already been decided by the Court and a second appeal has been preferred against the said order. Since the appeal itself has been decided, this writ petition, which impugns the interim order passed in that appeal, has become infructuous. The appellant would always be at liberty to challenge the interim orders that were passed in the first appeal, in the second appeal itself. In view of this, this writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. C. L. PANGARKAR, J. SMA