Civil Revision No. 2624 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2624 of 2011 Date of Decision: 19.5.2011 *** Purna Devi & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. Dharam Pal & Ors. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. M.S. Sachdev, Advocate for the petitioners. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. Vide judgment and decree dated 15.1.2003 the brother and mother respectively (proforma respondents No.2 and 3) of the present petitioners were held to have encroached upon the land measuring 7 marlas 5 sarsai, in a suit for possession filed by respondent No.1. When decree holder sought the possession of the suit land pursuant to the aforesaid judgment and decree, the petitioners filed an application for staying the execution proceedings and also determination of their possessory-cum- ownership rights. Their said prayer was declined by the Executing Court below vide order dated 12.1.2011. Hence, this revision petition. Heard. It is evident from the records that the relief of possession was claimed by the decree holder only from proforma respondents No.2 and 3, who ultimately were found to have encroached upon the suit land. Findings that the petitioners who are in collusion with the JDs who are none-else but their brother and mother respectively, are trying to wriggle out of the aforesaid judgment and decree by introducing a new case, which is not Civil Revision No. 2624 of 2011 2 within the domain of the executing Court since it cannot go beyond the decree, their application has rightly been dismissed by the Court below. There is no illegality or perversity in the impugned order. Dismissed. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE May 19, 2011 Jiten