IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.24901 of 2004 Between: Anasuri Krishna Sameera W/o. Venkataramana, Hindu, R/o. 69-6-44/6, Rajendranagar, Gaigolpadu,Kakinada, E.G.Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Sub-Inspector of Police Sarpavaram P.S., E.G.District. 2 Thummalapalli Veera Raghavendra Mani W/o. Late Anjaneyulu, Hindu 69-6-44/6, Rajendranagar, Gaigolpadu, Kakinada, E.G.District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to Issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the 1st respondent at the behest of 2nd respondent in interfering with the private life and liberty of the petitioner herein as wholly illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and for a consequential order directing the respondent No.1 not to interfere with the personal rights and liberty of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.S.VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.24901 of 2004 ORDER: Petitioner seeks to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in interfering with her personal life and liberty at the instance of the 2nd respondent as illegal and arbitrary. It appears that there are certain disputes with regard to the house property between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent, who is the mother of the petitioner. A counter has been filed by the 1st respondent stating that police never interfered with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner. It is stated that the 2nd respondent died on 18-01-2005 by committing suicide on account of the harassment meted out by the petitioner and her husband. Therefore, a case in Cr.No.10 of 2005 was registered for the offence punishable under Section 174 Cr.P.C. on 19-01-2005 and later on the Section of law was altered to Section 306 IPC read with Section 34 IPC and the investigation has been taken up. During the course of investigation, the petitioner and her husband were arrested and remanded to the judicial custody. Thus, it is stated that only after the death of the 2nd respondent, a case was registered against the petitioner and her husband and appropriate action has been taken in accordance with law. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, it cannot be said that the 1st respondent is interfering with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner at the instance of the 2nd respondent. Therefore, the writ petition is devoid of merit and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 17-04-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{AVLR}