THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY W.P.No.3301 of 2000 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) The writ petition is filed questioning the judgment made in L.G.A.No.24 of 1997 dated 29.4.1999 on the file of the Special Court under A.P.Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad confirming the judgment in L.G.O.P.No.104 of 1989 dated 2.4.1997 on the file of Special Tribunal-cum-District Judge, Krishna district at Machilipatnam and quash the same. The petitioners herein are the appellants in L.G.A.No.24 of 1997 on the file of the Special Court under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act (for short ‘the Special Court) and the Special Court dismissed the L.G. Appeal by the judgment dated 29.4.1999 holding that the applicants in the LGOP who are the respondents 1 and 2 in the appeal are entitled to recover the possession of the application schedule land of extent Ac.1.00 situated in N.T.S.No.22 of Machavaram village, Vijayawada mandal as demarcated and shown in the sketch marked as Ex.A5 and identified by the M.R.O., Vijayawada mandal as per his report dated 6.12.1990. Hence the present writ petition. This Court by order dated 23.4.2009 granted four weeks time to bring the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent on record observing that otherwise, the writ petition would stand dismissed as against the respondent No.1. The said order was not complied with and the same was given effect and the writ petition was dismissed as against the respondent No.1. Since the writ petition was dismissed against the respondent No.1 who is the applicant in the LGOP and the first respondent in the LGA, the order in the LGOP as confirmed in the LGA has become final insofar as the first respondent is concerned. Therefore, we are of the opinion that there cannot be any different and conflicting order against the second respondent on the same set of facts since the judgment passed by the Special Court is inseparable one and as such cannot be proceeded as against the respondent No.2 herein. The order of the Special Court is binding on the petitioners. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J ________________________ G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY, J Date: 9.8.2011 DA