IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 30 of 2010 Dr. (Smt.) Punita Bajpai ……Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …Respondents. Mr. Manoj Tiwari, Senior Advocate with Mr. Alok Mehra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Mr. B.D. Kandpal and Mr. B.D. Pande, Advocates for respondent no. 3. Ms. Beena Pande, Advocate for respondent nos. 4 and 5. Ms. Anjali Bhargava, Advocate for respondent nos. 6 and 7. Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Advocate for the interveners. Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J, (Oral) Learned counsel for the rival parties are agreed that the controversy raised in the instant writ petition is identical to the one adjudicated upon by this Court in Smt. Pushpa Budiyal Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others (Writ Petition (S/B) No. 29 of 2010), decided on 21.6.2010. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is allowed in terms of the judgment rendered by this Court in Smt. Pushpa Budiyal’s case (supra). (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 21.6.2010 Avneet