IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA SECOND APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2009 NAMDEV CHANDRU NAIK AND ANR., ... Appellants Versus SHRI. PETER BRAZILIO FERNANDES ... Respondent Mr.G. Nagvekar, advocate for the appellants. Mr.J.P. Mulgoankar, advocate for the respondent. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 21st September, 2010 P.C: Heard Mr. G. Nagvekar, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. J.P. Mulgaonkar, learned counsel for the respondent. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, I find that no ground has been made out to interfere with the judgments of both the Courts below by which the suit filed by the appellants/plaintiffs against the respondents has been dismissed. It is pertinent to note that the last agreement dated 6/2/1992 was drawn between Kanchan Kanta Naik and the respondent in respect of the suit premises and she has supported the defendant/respondent. This being the position, I find that the appellants/plaintiffs are not entitled to the reliefs sought in the suit. In view of the above and since no substantial question of law is involved, second appeal stands dismissed. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ap/-