w 0?? maw ggg % SB. §Service Matter) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT IN THE HON’BLE BILASPUR ICHHAIlISGARII) ’'‘- WRIT P 5 / pETmONER: Sheela Nikunj, wife of Jagafpwal Nikunj, ged at 57 years, resince Uon Compex, atelpar, Phuduladidhari, Ambikpur, Disrict Sarguja, Chttisgarh. versus Resgonde‘nt’s 1./ Sta of attgrh, Through te Chhisa ty War st’ ' Departmet, n DKS Ban hWa, Raur, ip Cgrh hhattisa. 2 Enir—Ir—Chief, t Resources Departet, ip, Chhaattisgarh. Secrear; te Reeirces f gneet Waer mn Raur neer Resoue 3rChief Engi, Water rc Dartnt, Has s, Bilaspnr, epme deo Bain Chhattiarh. sg WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF HE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, w? ET1T10N(S) No. Pa $ [2010. a bou de ra l Pa n a t ha T WW,WI§;W SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava J. 23-06-20 10 for the petitioner. Shri C.J.K. Rao, counse Shri Satish Gupta, Govt Advocate for the State/respondents. Heard. Challenge in this pet tion is to the order dated 8.6.2009 (Annexure P—1), whereby the rder granting benefit of increments, in respect of Assistant Grade-III who have not passed Hindi ’I‘ypewriting Examination, has been cancel ed. Court rendered in Ramchandra Kurup Vs. State of C.G. & othe s [WE (S) No.3663/2009] and other connected matters decided o 23rd November, 2009. Learned counsel prays that this petition may e disposed of in terms of Ramchandra Kurup (supra), to which learn d counsel appearing for the State has no objection. At the very outset, lear ed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involv d in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of thi Accordingly, the writ p ition is allowed in terms of order passed in the case of Ramchandra urup (supra). The impugned order dated 8.6.2009 (Annexure P—l), di ecting recovery of annual increment is quashed. No recovery of ayment of annual increments to the petitioner can be made purs \ t to the impugned order. If the amount W 200 mmW ammm anémW (Wu) mmW 31m whimW 13‘6m a:Wm “Bax” V’:XI-Hc_7s 3, WW “200 mmw ammm maféam (L WW wm $WW€¥I has already been recovered, amount with interest at the ra1 No order as to costs. M ray—(fl Manindra Mohan Jude Praveen the petitioner is entitled to the said e of 6% per annum. #1 ) \ Shrivasgayg,;\, Mia ' - i sa/- xx \\ mm (Wu) ’ g