IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 26TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 4TH ASWINA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 7564 of 2011() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.1476/2011 OF PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION PETITIONER : ACCUSED : --------------------------- M.I. SHIHABUDHEEN, S/O. MOHAMMED ISMAIL, PROPRIETOR, M.M.S BUS SERVICE, MANATH VADAKKEPUTHAN PURAYIL, THRIKKAKARA, KOCHI - 682 021. BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H. RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT AND STATE ------------------------------------ 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALARIVATTOM, ERNAKULAM - 682 024. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.MANU THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. --------------------------------------------- Bail Appln.No.7564 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of September, 2011 ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest in Crime No.1476 of 2011 of Palarivattom Police Station. The petitioner is the sole accused in the case. 2. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 403, 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The allegation is that promising to make the de facto complainant a partner of a partnership firm, the petitioner collected amounts from him. But he was not made a partner. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that for the purpose of investigation, it is not necessary to arrest the petitioner. This submission is recorded. However, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that it is necessary for the petitioner to co-operate with the investigating officer. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is prepared to fully co-operate with the investigating officer in the matter of investigation and that he is prepared to appear before the Investigating Officer as and Bail Appln.No.7564/2011 : 2 : when directed. The submission made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner is also recorded. In view of the stand taken by the prosecution, no orders are required in the case. The Bail Application is accordingly, closed. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE skj