IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46967 of 2008 PINTU YADAV, son of Indradeo Yadav, resident of village Ghogharpatti, P.S. Sour Bazar, District Saharsa … Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ….Opposite party ----------- For the Petitioner :Mr. Radha Mohan Singh, Advocate For the State :Mr. Nityanand Tiwary, A.P.P. 03/ 18.12.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 364, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act and is named in the First Information Report along with 10 others, including Ram Kumar Yadav and Ram Chandra Sharma, whose prayer for bail has already been rejected by another Bench of this Court. The allegation against the petitioner and Ram Kumar Yadav and Ram Chandra Sharma appears to be almost similar as all the co-accused named in the First Information Report had forcibly taken the deceased on the horse back whereafter his dead body was recovered. In view of the allegation set out in the First Information Report, I am also not inclined to admit the petitioner to the privilege of bail. This application is, accordingly, rejected. It is submitted that trial has already begun and two witnesses have been examined. In the circumstances, trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, in any case within nine months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order. 2 Let this order be communicated not only to the trial court (Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. IV, Madhepura), but also to the Superintendent of Police, Madhepura and the Officer-in- Charge, Bihariganj P.S. in connection with Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 69 of 2001(S.T. No. 121 of 2007) by the office of this Court through fax for production and examination of the witnesses on the date fixed. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)