IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH JULY 2008 / 18TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 20689 of 2008(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- A.V.ACHUTHAN, AVASSERY HOUSE, P.O.VARAVOOR, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.N.PADMAKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE MANAGER, KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, KMM COMPLEX, THRISSUR-21. 2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, KMM COMPLEX, THRISSUR-21. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. BY SRI.V.B.UNNIRAJ, SC, KFC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 20689 OF 2008 K ==================== Dated this the 9th day of July, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is a defaulter to the 1st respondent. Revenue recovery action was initiated and that was called in question before this court in WP (C) No.6983/08. That writ petition was disposed of by Ext.P2 judgment granting him instalment facility and also a default clause enabling the respondents to continue the action. Admittedly, the instalment was not complied with. It is now stated by the petitioner that though he had offered payment that is not accepted on the allegation that he did not comply with the schedule of payment as ordered by this court. 2. In my view, if this is the grievance, the appropriate course open to the petitioner is to seek enlargement of the time specified in Ext.P2 judgment and a second writ petition is not the remedy. Therefore, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to seek enlargement of the time specified in Ext.P2, this writ petition is disposed of. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp