IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2010 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WA.No. 2093 of 2010() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN RP.975/2010 Dated 19/11/2010 .................... APPELLANT(S): REVIEW PETITIONER IN RP ------------------------------------- SMT.P.REMADEVI, W/O.K.BALAKRISHNAN, AGED 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT "POURNAMI", H/NO.IX/262, P.O.EDANEER, CHENGALA, KASARAGOD-671541. BY ADV. SRI.A.K.ABDUL AZEEZ RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS IN RP -------------------------------- 1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, KASARAGOD-670121. 2. TAHSILDAR (RR), KASARAGOD-670121. 3. TOJI ABRAHAM, S/O.ABRAHAM, KALLAR, RAJAPURAM P.O., VIA ANANDASRAM, KANHANGAD, HOSDURG, KASARAGOD-671531. MR.MOHAMMED RAFEEQ, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JJ. ---------------------------------- W.A. No.2093 of 2010 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 15th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Ramachandran Nair, J. During hearing of the writ appeal filed against the order in the review petition, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant wants to file writ appeal against the judgment in the writ petition. Since the review petition is dismissed, it is for the appellant to file writ appeal against the judgment in the writ petition, if she has any grievance. Therefore, leaving freedom to the appellant to file writ appeal against the judgment in the WP(C), we close the writ appeal filed against the order in the review petition. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) (BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JUDGE) jg