IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal Ist Bail Application No.83 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE 1. Surat Ram 2. Anil ……….Applicants (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party ________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.354 of 2009, U/Ss 307/420/34 IPC, P.S. Vikas Nagar, Distt. Dehradun Dated: January 27, 2010 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri Mohd. Azim, Advocate i/b Sri Sandeep Tandon, Adv. for the applicant and Sri Nandan Arya, learned AGA for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that it is a no injury case and the applicant has been falsely implicated in the above case. He further submitted that in case crime No.357/2009 u/s 60 Excise Act, the applicants have been released on bail on 23.12.2009 by the order of the Special Magistrate CBI, Dehradun while for the offence punishable u/s 25 Arms Act, both the applicants have also been granted bail by the Sessions Judge, Dehradun on 8.1.2010. Lastly, they are in jail since 21.12.2009. After considering all the facts and circumstances, on hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the contents of the FIR and also on perusal of other material on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicants deserve bail at this stage. Let each of the applicants, namely, Surat Ram and Anil be released on bail on each of their executing personal bonds and also on furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Dehradun. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) Vacation Judge 27.1.2010 Rajeev Dang