mm 7 mW<W> Wmm 1T1 zoo WW WWR éa‘a'ifcmm LATT§§GARH AT EILASEU'R 9’2“ N9; 2.948} 20 Kumar ‘ripr1 Qkrwxf algaln, lansil 85 mstnct— { 08 JagatramKa —’2 1 Lu Lu“, vpg 1t: ) ' aih (bu) E HOM’BLB SHRJ fHiIRE S NB Mr. Goutam Kharapai, C Mr. AS. Kacnhawana, Dy, H€EICL patition for m6 foiiowing reheis. The petitionsr has flied this al for {as peunonm‘. ‘Advocate Generai for the State. O S m3k’GNEEETS 1. Banwariici Jagatramxa, Sio- Late b‘nn Ragalqfla] ag5d ghonf -94 vpara Dr?e§11t Auumss- 1.49 p, nah mam harm yemcava laua . Kilidirpmv homatta—zd (w B } '2 Ank‘“ Kwmnv bcatramka, Sim L .g $h.1 wanesa Numar ageu about — ysals Rf 123 F Bari Kigary QQVTH panchva Tang Rh din 1 y Kvikdud— E" (‘w’BJ S bmt. AsiLi “evi Ja?,atrw11ka, WIO— Navneti‘t Kumar-‘a rmwka, ww abevt Q1 VPam Pin- Nayaganj, RauGeun (bu) ; 4, Naimeet J gafmmlm Sfe— Ln“ Shh; 13mm Prakash J garramKa aged about —36 wars, 5. Rio» Ggm 1 m’n Rawmh (CCW T116 Caiiév‘t' “ ‘ mm V 111200 311%“m (Wu) mmm www fsém $2._ kafmm “H11 That, respondents may kindiy bf: diréctad by writ OI ‘ } yrQdnhP H1? P11f§rp rgcgrdS’ for perusal b€fore 11hr; Hon'me Loan. [\3 l'—- mahR am11¢ f0 fgrfhx F. C 1at, 1316 orciEr datEci O7i05/‘2008 (Annex. F- 1} be l’p vrat I-I:(5 4!* 1U.5 111 favour of the petmonar and agamst m6 rgmwrmdFnfQ Vr _ __wv__ .._ Qs it may deem W and “WWW-1” I""f~‘ undsr the fetch; and circumsian xs 01 r ‘Luc‘. 1 cases wiih cosis. u hat, this; i-ionrbie C011rt may furthm‘ bf: pmaseci to iamw 91W S116}: writ 91‘ dimmioxl QQQ Qnv nFhPv‘ nrdg 1 .2 :w The gricvanca of rim pe’rjtioner is that his appucauon under Section 151 of me L‘l—‘L: Has been on the ground that under Sectim 151 of the CPC, injunction can not be grantec‘t and the Court has not de t into merits of cage ot the petmoner. Learned eoutlsel for tl‘e petitioner submite that in vtne meanwhiie, a part of suit land has been acquired by the State and therefore, this petition may he ( osed of with Liberty to the petitioner to move appiication for amend ent in the piaint and hie another appiication uncier Order XXXIX, Ru‘ie 1 8r. ’2‘ of the CFC for temporary injunction, which may he decide after hearing the partiea Learnet‘i counsel for the S te has no objection, it the petition is disposeti ofwith the aforesaid lib rty. in View of the submission of learned counsel for the respective parties, this petition is dismisse l as Withdrawn with libeity as prayed "\ Sdl \ \ inhirendra 101". Mishrax Judge \l K i r \ H 1' p