IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.2301 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: September 27, 2011 Puran & others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS Sunita Devi .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. The impugned orders have been passed, ad-interim, to the effect that Aditya, who is admittedly the son of the respondent, aged 6 years is required to be restored to the custody of the respondent. 2. In Para 15 of the order passed by the Magistrate, the Court has recorded its own observations, on observance of the conduct of the child. 3. All that has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioners is that husband of the respondent committed Criminal Revision No.2301 of 20 11 [2] suicide on account of harassment by the respondent-wife. 4. No material has been placed before this Court or before the Lower Courts so as to show that the respondent-mother had ever acted in contravention or against the interests/ welfare of the child. In such circumstances, no ground for interference in the interim arrangement is made out. 5. The petition is dismissed. 6. The Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Meham, District Rohtak is directed to take a final decision in the case within six months from the next date of hearing. 7. Learned counsel contends that custody of the child shall be given to the respondent-mother within 7 days. (AJAI LAMBA) September 27, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?