IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1641 of 2007 RAM PYARE PRASAD SINGH, S/O LATE MANOHAR GOND, R/O VILLAGE- KARNPURA, PIPRA, P.O + P.S- DURGAWATI, DIST- KAIMUR………………………………………………PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR THRU THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. MR. A. AMANULLAH, HOME SECRETARY, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. MR. ASHISH RANJAN SINHA, D.G. OF POLICE BIHAR, PATNA. 4. MR. PRADEEP KR. SRIVASTAVA, S.P. KAIMUR,……. RESPONDENTS ----------- 04. 14-July-2010 Heard the parties. It appears that now the petitioner has been reinstated in service pursuant to order of the writ Court but his claim for consequential benefits have not been decided by the authorities. Learned counsel for the State submits that the order of the writ Court required reinstatement and has been ordered and effected although a Letters Patent Appeal is said to be pending against the order of the writ Court. In view of the aforesaid submission, the contempt petition is disposed of. If the petitioner is having other grievances, he may pursue the same through the appropriate proceedings. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)