THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.Nos.973&978 of 2010 COMMON ORDER: The respondents filed O.S.No.258 of 2009 in the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa against the petitioner for the relief of perpetual injunction and certain other ancillary reliefs. The trial of the suit is yet to commence. The respondents filed I.A.Nos.36 and 75 of 2010 under Rule 1-A of Order VIII read with Section 151 of C.P.C. with a prayer to condone the delay in filing certain documents and photographs. The applications were opposed by the petitioner. Through separate orders, dated 11.02.2010, the trial Court allowed the applications. Hence, these two revisions. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. The objections raised by the petitioner are mostly as to the merits of the matter and the relevance of the documents. The applications filed by the respondents are only for condonation of delay in filing the documents. Mere condonation of delay would not by itself have any bearing upon the relevance or admissibility of the documents. The petitioner can put forward his objections, as and when the documents are marked during the course of evidence. The condonation of delay in the matters of this nature is purely in the discretion of the trial Court. The civil revision petitions are accordingly dismissed. It is however left open to the petitioner to raise all objections as to the relevance or proof, at appropriate stage. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 19.04.2010 JSU THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.Nos.973&978 of 2010 Date: 19.04.2010 JSU