IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24998 of 2010 RAJIV KUMAR SON OF HARIVANSH MAHTO, R/O VILLAGE-PIER TOLE NANKAR, P.S. PIER, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. --PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. HARNEDRA PRASAD, SON OF LATE KHAKHAN BHAGAT, R/O VILLAGE-MUSLAMANI CHAK, P.S. MINAPUR, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. --OPP.PARTY 2 12.08.2010 Heard Ms. Bela Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri U.S.P. Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Sri Arun Kumar, learned counsel for the complainant. Supplementary affidavit has also been filed on behalf of the petitioner enclosing copy of Matrimonial Case 286 of 2009 filed by him under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner is named accused in this complaint case being husband of complainant’s daughter, carries allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioner, in the event of her arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on bail on her furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with 2 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in Complaint Case no. 3239 of 2009, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date before the court below at least for two years or till disposal of the case whichever is earlier. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad