IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34780 of 2010 ZULUM RAI, S/o Late Jineshwar Rai. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 05.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 290, 323 and 324/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substance Act. It has been submitted that the petitioner was allowed bail by order dated 22.04.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 12427 of 2010 on merits and period of custody but on verification that the petitioner was not made an accused after the year 1983. On verification it was found to be incorrect therefore, the petitioner was not released. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail stating therein that on merits he deserves to be bailed out and he is presently an accused in three cases besides the present case. Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 125 of 2 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the son of the petitioner namely Nakul Rai. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)