IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 14TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 32610 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- PEREESHA BEEVI, AMEENA MANZIL, NEAR KILIMANOOR GOVERNMENT H.S.S., KILIMANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST, KERALA BY ADV. SRI.P.K.MUHAMMED RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2. ADDITIONAL THAHSILDAR, CHIRAYINKIL TALUK, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 3. VILLAGE OFFICE, KILIMANOOR VILLAGE, KILIMANOOR, THIRUVANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. BY GP SMT.SUDHA DEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).32610/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 5th day of November, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P6 order passed by the Tahsildar imposing prohibitory assessment and further seeking eviction of the petitioner from the property scheduled in Ext.P7. Though the petitioner has filed Ext.P8 representation before the District Collector, she has also caused the issuance of Ext.P9 notice under Section 80 C.P.C to the State and its officials. It is the case of the petitioner that she has decided to file a suit against the Government and its officials before the competent Civil Court for declaration of title and possession. I heard learned Government Pleader also. In the circumstances writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to keep in abeyance further proceedings pursuant to Exts.P6 and P7 for a period of ten weeks from today. In the meanwhile, it is open to the W.P.(C).32610/2008 2 petitioner to approach the Civil Court for appropriate reliefs, after the expiry of the period of Ext.P9 notice. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs