IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1202 OF 2008 PETITION NO.1202 OF 2008 PETITION NO.1202 OF 2008 Anil Gajanan Ambole ... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. V.V. Purwant, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. A.S. Pai, APP for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & : B.H. MARLAPALLE & : B.H. MARLAPALLE & R.Y. R.Y. R.Y. GANOO, JJ GANOO, JJ GANOO, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 13TH JUNE, 2008 : 13TH JUNE, 2008 : 13TH JUNE, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. :- :- :- 1. Heard Mr. Purwant, learned Counsel for the petitioner who was granted parole leave and was subsequently extended on two occasions. The extended period is due to expire on 15/6/2008 and therefore he has approached this Court praying for further extension of 90 days. 2. As noted earlier, the authority concerned has considered the extension of parole leave and granted twice. If the petitioner requires further extension, it is for him to approach the concerned authorities with such an application, as per rules. 3. We do not therefore find any justification 2 to entertain this petition. The petitioner is at liberty to submit a fresh application, after he surrenders and such an application would be considered by the authority concerned, as per the rules. ( B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.) B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.) B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.) ( R.Y. GANOO, J.) R.Y. GANOO, J.) R.Y. GANOO, J.)