^. ^ ^ ^"^^^•^s^l 'L^ ^^'^^"^~^^^^^'^^^^^ur%^^^^"~y^^ Cf 'SssS' ^ ^ ^— cp^!_ , UrTHE mGH COtTRT OF JODICATURE OP CHHATTISiGESRn AT BILASPUR ^fc^^- WRITPESLITION (Cl N0. 143 /2007 •y^/i PETITIOWER:- ^f\. v\°'>;:"tfr-1""..••••"" •^^"^f^ '.;"\ o .1''' ^y^ y^Y-Smt. Sheela Singh @ Madhu Singh W/o.- Ramkeshwar Smgh, Aged about 26 years,R/o.- Sector-1 C 349 T. S. Balco, Korba District Korba Disfrict - Korba (C.G.) !^ y RESPONDENT VERSUS ^- Dr. Ramkeshwar Singh, S/o.- Sfaankar Prasad Aged about 30years, R/o.- Primaiy Health Center, Mardapal, Tahsil Kondagaon District Bastar (C.G.) ll^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE '2!S& 1 22$<OFTHE CONSTITHTION OF IKDIA The petitioner above named most respectfully submifs as under: XI-HC-78 sn^r^rR^icti (raT311<!ilsh^l»h +<1+1MI sh*1|ch ?ST •:qrai^ra', ®Tn'H'i6,Ridi<iy ^:^^1.^. W[ 2009 Sii^i ^ach (l^rf^5'^') 5^tTSK(rfNa:ff^T Shri Y.C. Shanna, lean[ied counsel for fhe petitioner. This petition is dir^cted agaiiist the oider dated 5.10.2006 passed by the F| No.25-A/2006 whereby the| appUcation of fhe respond^f petition under Sectiou 13 oft| ^mity Court, Bilaspur in. M.J.C. Court below has allowed the ;nt for am.endiaent ia divorce Lcarued couusel for ameudiaents prayed for by respect to the facts which ^ petition. However, the Court ' for ataendiaent assigniag fhe subseauent events. Having heard leamed perused the iinpugued ordj am.endiaent ia fbie divorce pe|tit: fhe considered opulion that »hi'!<f<?f''fl-iiirrofif fe^l <fai<^ii: ^a.rf^R'an^T tie Hiadu Marriage Act. pie petitioner subniits fhat fhe fhe said application vvere witli ^ere prior to filuig of flie divorce |below has allowed flie appUcation reason that fhe same pertaias to counsel for the petitioner aad ^r whereby the application for tion has beeu aUowecl. we are of by the order iinpugned no grave 'x XI-HC-78 +11+1MI shHlth 35T ^i<iid<i, yrfltf'ie, (ciwiuy ^:J:>.:C.C.?../.^.. .-y./-...-.-;.'..;..r...... ^. 2<)(p 3ii^i Ma<*> ('i^t^S.ff) sn^T^iTf^ira; (raTsn^Tsbiiti STTtTgTBfscran^T i»i<iFci<fl-<tiiidTffte<^'<l»i'Kic ^sri^lTStl^T injustice 1s ILkely to occasio interference bv this Coui-1 il to fhe parties, which warraats t while exercising supervisory 227 of tbe Constitlltion of jurisdietiou vested under Ai(ticle India. Accordiagly, flie petiti^n deserves to be disinissed at the adiuission stage itselfaad is llierebv disuussed. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge P.T.O. '^rV