IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL REVISION NO.63 OF 2004 Jakir S/o Kadam R/o Village Kanhadpur, P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, Distt. Hardwar … Revisionist Versus State of Uttaranchal & another … Respondents Sri Tapan Singh holding brief of Sri Lokpal Singh, ld. counsel for the revisionist Sri Harish Pujari, learned Addl. G.A. for State/Respondent No.1 Sri Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for Respondent No.2 Dated: July 10, 2008 HON. DHARAM VEER, J. This criminal revision, preferred by the revisionist under Section 397/401 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as Cr.P.C.) r/w Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, is directed against the order dated 20.4.2004 passed by Judge, Family Court, Hardwar in Case No.185 of 2002, Smt. Vakila Vs. Jakir. 2. Sri Tapan Singh, Adv. holding brief of Sri Lokpal Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present revision with the liberty to avail the appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum. 3. In view of the aforesaid statement given by learned counsel for the revisionist, the revision is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the liberty is given to the revisionist to avail the appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum. Interim order dated 19.05.2004 stands vacated. (Dharam Veer, J.) 10.7.2008 Rajeev Dang