1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1955 OF 2010 1. Bhimrao S/o.Shivram Patil, Age-78 years, Occu-Nil, 2. Dilip S/o.Onkar Patil, Age-45 years, Occu-Agriculturist, 3. Nimba S/o.Ramji Magar/Patil, Age-45 years, Occu-Service, 4. Bhagwat S/o.Girdhar Pawar/Patil, Age-24 years, Occu-Service, 5. Sachin @ Tinu S/o.Vithal patil, Age-24 years, Occu-Service, All applicants are R/o. Takali Pra De, Tal.Chalisgaon, Dist. Jalgaon APPLICANTS VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra Through the In-charge Police Station, Mehunbare, Tq. Chalisgaon, Dist. Jalgaon 2. The Superintendent of Police, Jalgaon, Tq. and Dist. Jalgaon RESPONDENTS Mr.V.D.Sapkal, learned counsel for applicants. Mr.K.S.Patil , learned APP for State 2 CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J. DATE : 15/06/2010 PER COURT : 1. By the present application, the applicants have approached this Court for their release on bail in connection with CR No. 54/2010, registered in Mehunbare Police Station, Tql. Chalisgaon, Dist. Jalgaon. 2. Heard learned counsel for applicants, and learned APP for State. Record shows that interim protection was granted to these applicants during the vacation vide order dated 25/05/2010. 3. Perusal of the papers of investigation shows that an offence came to be registered on the complaint of one Anil Kumawat, the brother of deceased Ravindra, who was assaulted in the night of 23/04/2010, around 10.30 p.m., while he was proceeding on his motor bike near Takali Chalisgaon Road, near the water tank. This information he has received on phone from one Narayan Kumawat, who is also not the eye witness of the alleged incident, who has received this information from one Aba Hiraman. It appears that during the investigation followed by the complaint lodged by Anil Kumawat, statement of those Aba Hiraman and one Santosh Koli was recorded. Perusal of the statement of Aba and Santosh discloses that at the relevant time, he noticed that deceased Ravindra was assaulted by one Vinod Shinde and 7-8 other unknown persons. 3 Admittedly, this Vinod is not party to this application. Neither the complaint nor the statement of witnesses, who has witnessed the incident discloses the names of these applicants, as the assailants of Ravindra. At this stage, there is no evidence to connect these applicants with the said CR. In the premise, case is made out to enlarge the applicants on anticipatory bail, hence order : O R D E R 1. Application is allowed. 2. Interim protection granted on 25/05/2010 to continue till filing of the charge sheet. 3. Applicants to co-operate the investigation agency and to attend the police station, whenever required. 4. Application stands disposed of accordingly. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/JUNE 2010/cri.appl.1955-10