WPMS No. 16 of 2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. B.B. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Brief Holder for the State. The petitioner has challenged the reservation of the seats in the District of Haridwar. It has been stated by the learned Brief Holder that the election schedule was announced on 2nd December, 2010 pursuant to which a notification has been issued on 3rd January, 2011 indicating various dates for holding the election in various blocks. In Special Appeal No. 234 of 2010, a Division Bench of this Court held that when steps have been taken on 2nd December, 2010 for holding the election by publishing the schedule of the election, no steps could be taken in relation to delimitation of the constituencies. Similar view was again held by a Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition (PIL) No. 96 of 2010 in Vishal Chauhan Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others which was decided on 3rd January, 2011. The Court finds that apart from the fact that the election schedule was published on 2nd December, 2010, the learned Brief Holder has placed a photocopy of the notification dated 3rd January, 2011 indicating the election schedule. This court is of the opinion that once the election schedule has been notified, the Court is not inclined to interfere in the election process. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 06.01.2011 Shiv