IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.16807 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: October 24, 2006 Sat Pal ….Petitioner VERSUS Union Territory, Chandigarh and others …..Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA PRESENT: Shri Navkiran Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral). The petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of directions to respondent No.2, Deputy Commissioner, Chandigarh to recommend the case of the petitioner for allotment of dwelling unit/flat to the petitioner. The petitioner claims that being a Kashmiri migrant, he is entitled to the aforesaid allotment. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the averments made in the present petition, we find that the petitioner has merely filed an application dated February 6, 2006 (Annexure P.6). However, a perusal of the application shows that no details of the petitioner have been given in the said application, nor it has been disclosed as to how and in what circumstances, the petitioner is entitled to any allotment of the flat/dwelling unit. CWP NO.16807 of 2006 -2- In this view of the matter, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, we dispose of the present petition with a liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed and comprehensive application before the Deputy Commissioner, Chandigarh. Alongwith the aforesaid application, all the documents relevant to the claim of the petitioner shall also be appended. If any such application is filed by the petitioner, then the Deputy Commissioner, Chandigarh shall take an appropriate decision thereupon within a period of two months after the filing of the said application. A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. (Viney Mittal) Judge October 24, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla) KD Judge