Crl.M.No.M-17684 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-17684 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 1, 2010 Tarsem Kumar .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Naresh Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.64, dated 30.1.2010, under Sections 382, 34 IPC, registered at Police Station City Sirsa, District Sirsa. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully. Brief allegations against petitioner-accused are that on 30.1.2010, at about 9.20 p.m., complainant was present in his shop by keeping down the shutter and engaged in Puja, when Balwinder Singh alongwith Harjinder Singh and Nanak Singh, co-accused entered the shop by opening the shutter and snatched Rs.30/40,000/- alongwith his mobile make Nokia N-72 having No.94664-71100 alongwith its battery and sim card. Petitioner alongwith co-accused Krishan was standing outside the shop as a guard just to facilitate the co-accused to commit theft. Mobile alongwith sim card was recovered from the possession of Balwinder Singh and he gave statement before the police that petitioner also shared common intention to commit theft in the shop of the complainant. As per his statement the share of present petitioner was Rs.9,000/- and the same is yet to be recovered from him. Hence, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused. Crl.M.No.M-17684 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Tarsem Kumar for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 1.7.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge