IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2009 / 15TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 343 of 2009(N) ------------------------ PETITIONER(S): --------------- CHARLES.T.DAVID, S/O.DAVID, THOPPIL HOUSE, PERINGOLE, KOLENCHERY.P.O, ERNAKULAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI SRI.T.R.SADEESAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, REP.BY THE CHIEF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, REGIONAL OFFICE, KOCHI-682020. 2. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, REGIONAL OFFICE, KOCHI-682020. 3. M/S.VIJAY CONSTRUCTIONS, MYKULANGARA, KINGINIMATTAM, KOLENCHERRY-682311.REP.BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER. BY SC SRI. M.K. CHANDRAMOHAN DAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No.343 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 5th day of January, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that the 3rd respondent, who has been issued Exts.P1 and P2, the consent and its conditions is operating his unit without complying with the conditions imposed. Complaining of this the petitioner has filed Ext.P4 before the 2nd respondent and in this writ Petition what he seeks is an order requiring the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4. In view of the allegations that the 3rd respondent is not complying with the conditions of Exts.P1 and P2, I direct that the 2nd respondent shall consider Ext.P4 with notice to the 3rd respondent and pass orders there on. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) vi JUDGE