1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL WRIT No. 4454 of 2008 UNION OF INDIA & ORS V/S KANHIYALAL DHAKAD & ANR Mr. VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. SK MALIK, for the respondent Date of Order : 15.7.2008 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI KISHAN SWAROOP CHAUDHARI,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, perused the impugned order. The learned Tribunal has positively recorded the finding believing the version of the applicant about the reason for his not admitting his son in SMS Hospital, Jaipur, and taking him to Rungta Hospital, Jaipur. This is pure finding of fact, and is not shown to be contrary to any material on record. The Tribunal has further found that this Rungta Hospital is one of the approved hospitals. Learned counsel for the petitioner then submitted that in any case, the entire amount of bill could not have been allowed as allowed by the Tribunal, and the matter was required to be gone into by the Tribunal to examine, as to amounts under which head out of the bill were admissible to the applicant before the Tribunal. 2 We have considered the submissions and find that in the reply submitted on behalf of the present petitioner before the learned Tribunal, no controversy in this regard had been raised, rather the only controversy raised was that the treatment was take in the hospital, which was not recognised, nor accepted as a higher centre. Regarding various items of the bill, no objection was raised in the reply about the admissibility of any particular item. In that view of the matter, we do not feel inclined to entertain this contention anew in our writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is devoid of merit, and the same is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( KISHAN SWAROOP CHAUDHARI ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/