IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.104/2008 Babu Lal Narnoli S/o Shri Bansidharji & Others Versus State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order ::: 27.02.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Satyendra Kumar Gupta, Counsel for petitioners Smt. Nirmala Sharma, PP, for the State Shri Sandeep Pathak, Counsel for complainant-non- petitioner #### By the Court:- Accused-petitioners have preferred this criminal revision petition under Section 397 of he Code of Criminal Procedure against the impugned order dated 29th November, 2007 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhunjhunu, in Criminal Case No.631/2002, whereby the trial court has taken cognizance against the accused-persons for the offence under Sections 295, 427, 379, IPC. The learned counsel for both the parties do not dispute that the impugned order is revisable and the revision is maintainable before the Court of Sessions. Although the jurisdiction of revision before this Court and the Court of Sessions is concurrent but normally this court does not entertain the revision petition directly without filing revision petition before the Court of Sessions. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this revision petition itself may be transferred to the Court of Sessions Judge for its disposal on merits but his only submission is that instead of transferring this case to the court of Sessions Judge, Jhunjhunu, who has jurisdiction to hear this revision petition, it may be transferred to any other court of Sessions Judge within the State of Rajasthan. He has shown some photographs during the course of arguments, which are not on the record. He has argued the case in support of his prayer for transfer of the case from Jhunjhunu. He has also referred sub-section (2) of Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which empowers this Court on its own to take initiative to transfer any criminal case from one District to any other District. Both the learned counsel agree that the revision petition may be transferred to the Court of Sessions Judge, Sikar. After considering the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties, this revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the Registry to transfer the original revision petition along-with the impugned order and annexed documents to the Court of Sessions Judge, Sikar, for its disposal on merits in accordance with law. Both the parties are directed to appear before the Sessions Judge, Sikar, on 24th March, 2008. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman// S.No.32