IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M-75 of 2009 Date of decision : 26.02.2009 Mandeep Singh and others ....Petitioners V/s State of Punjab and another ....Respondents. BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. J.S. Thind, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG Punjab. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) On the last date of hearing following order was passed in this case: “Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been summoned pursuant to a criminal complaint preferred by Swaroop Kaur. He further submits that pursuant to the summoning order, they wish to appear before the trial court and face the trial. He further submits that the case is triable by the Magistrate, the complaint was filed on 10th January, 2007 and the petitioners have been summoned vide order dated 10th July, 2008. He also submits that since no investigation is pending, the petitioners deserve the concession of pre-arrest bail. Case to come up for further hearing on 26th February, 2009. Meanwhile, it is directed that in case the petitioners appear before the trial court within a week, the trial court shall admit them to bail to its satisfaction. The counsel for the petitioners is directed to take steps to serve the unserved respondent.” Crl. Misc No. M-75 of 2009 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to above order, petitioners have already appeared before the trial court and furnished the bail bonds. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, submits that in case information turns out to be false, liberty may be granted for moving an appropriate application in this regard. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, no further orders are called for. Petition stands disposed of. However, liberty as prayed for is granted to the counsel for the State. 26.02.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE