IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-649 of 2010 Date of Decision: February 16, 2010 Alok Sharma & Another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Ms. G.K. Mann, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.518 dated 27.11.2009 under Sections 420, 409, 405, 406, 109, 120-B, 34 IPC registered with Police Station, Sadar, Amritsar. Crl. Misc. No. M-649 of 2010 [2] Learned counsel for the respondent- State, on instructions from Paramjit Singh, Assistant Sub Inspector, states that the petitioners have joined investigation and are not required for further interrogation. In view of the statement made on behalf of the investigating agency, the petition is allowed. Order dated 27.1.2010 is hereby made absolute and it is directed that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer, subject to the following conditions:- “(i) The petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation as and when required; (ii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person ac- quainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and (iii) The petitioners shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.” This order shall enure till 15 days after the filing of final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. within which period, the petitioners shall be re- quired to seek regular bail. (AJAI LAMBA) February 16, 2010 JUDGE avin Crl. Misc. No. M-649 of 2010 [3] 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?