IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.247 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7191 OF 2003 Ms.Libania Joseph Dias ...Applicant Versus Chandrakant Raghunath Yerlekar ...Respondent ...... Mr.Vivek Salunkhe for Applicant. Mr.P.G.Karande for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JULY 24, 2008. JULY 24, 2008. JULY 24, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Counsel for the Respondent states on instructions that the entire outstanding dues have been settled. Besides, the Respondent is regularly paying monthly compensation. This statement was made even on the earlier occasion on the basis of which, the Application was to be disposed of as withdrawn. Counsel for the Applicant, however, submits that even today, he has no instructions from his client. : 2 : 2. There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the statement made by the Counsel for the Respondent. 3. In the circumstances, this Application is disposed of with liberty to the Applicant to take out fresh application, in the event, the Applicant is able to substantiate that the statement made by the Counsel for the Respondent across the bar, is incorrect. That grievance can be considered on its own merits and appropriate directions can be issued as may be required. 4. Needless to observe that the Respondent shall continue to pay future monthly compensation on regular basis. 5. Application disposed of on the above terms. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.