IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 6TH JUNE 2008 / 16TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 11351 of 2008(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- B.INDIRABAI AGED 51 YEARS,D/O. BAATHIAMMA,RESIDING AT HARITHAM KURIKKODE P.O., TIRUVANKULAM,ERANAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.AJAYA KUMAR. G RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. KOLLAM CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY KOLLAM. 2. THE SECRETARY KOLLAM CORPORATION KOLLAM. 3. RAJEEVAN AGED 44 YEARS S/O. RAGHAVAN, RESIDING AT RAGHAVEEYAM, PATTATHANAM,KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.G.ANIL BABU FOR R3 SRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, SC FOR R1 & R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 11351 OF 2008 B = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 6th June 2008 J U D G M E N T This writ petition was filed on the allegation that the 3rd respondent is running a saw mill without licence. Petitioner also submits that he has filed Ext. P5 complaint before the 2nd respondent, seeking action against the 3rd respondent. Counsel for the 3rd respondent appears and submits that he has got all the necessary licences and that the allegations to the contrary are incorrect. 2. Now that the petitioner has filed Ext. P5 before the 2nd respondent, it is for the 2nd respondent to enquire into the matter and if necessary take action. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing that the 2nd respondent shall take note of Ext. P5, issue notice to the petitioner and the 3rd respondent, hear their contentions and thereafter take a decision on Ext. P5. It is clarified that it will be open to the parties to make available whatever documents they want to rely on before the 2nd respondent in W.P.(C) No. 11351 OF 2008 -2- support of their claims. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-