THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2293 OF 2011 Dated:11.08.2011 Between: Chenna Appa Rao .. Petitioner And Chenna Pothuraju and others .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2293 OF 2011 ORDER: The petitioner’s suit, being O.S.No.799 of 2004 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry, for partition, was dismissed. Being aggrieved, he preferred an appeal being A.S.No.201 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Family-cum-Additional District Judge, Rajahmundry. During the pendency of the same, the petitioner filed I.A.No.81 of 2011 under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for appointment of an advocate-commissioner to note down the physical features of Plot No.471 along with measurements for better appreciation of the point in issue. By impugned order dated 07.04.2011, the learned appellate Judge dismissed the said application. Aggrieved by which, the present civil revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The only plea raised by the petitioner in support of his application for appointment of an advocate-commissioner is that when he filed the suit describing the plaint schedule property as admeasuring 150 sq. yards, the family arrangement mentions it as 300 sq. yards and, therefore, appointment of advocate- commissioner would be proper. This ground did not weigh with the appellate Court nor this Court is of the opinion that it is a ground germane for appointment of advocate-commissioner. The petitioner as a plaintiff is required to prove inter alia the exact area of the property in respect of which he is seeking partition. For doing so, appointment of advocate-commissioner would not be necessary. The Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merits and is, accordingly, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ (V.V.S. RAO, J) 11.08.2011 KH