In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CRM No. M- 29854 of 2008 Decided on:- 15.05.2009 Sagira ……Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others…….Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. C. Puri Present Mr. G. S. Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. APS Mann, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Ms. Poonam Mehta, Advocate for Juvanile Mohd. Javed. K. C. Puri, J.(Oral ) Learned State counsel as well as counsel for Juvanile Mohd. Javed have stated at bar that they have no objection in case the order dated 8.10.2008 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to JMIC to determine whether Mohd. Javed is Juvanile or not. Learned counsel for the petitioner has accepted that proposition. So, in these circumstances, impugned order dated 8.10.2008 as well as order dated 24.7.2008 stands set aside and the matter is remitted back to JMIC to determine whether Mohd. Javed accused was juvanile on the date of occurrence after holding an inquiry in accordance with the provisions of the Act. Parties are directed to appear before that Court on 1.6.2009. Petition stands disposed of. May 15, 2009 ( K.C. Puri ) Mamta Judge