IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.915 of 2009 Between: M/s. Sri Sai Baba Talkies, A partnership firm rep. by its Managing Partner Y. Sai Ram Reddy, S/o. Late Nagi Reddy R/o. D.No.9-260/1, Sai Baba Temple Street, Kanigiri, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Ongole, Prakasam District. 2 The Joint Collector, Ongole, Prakasam District. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur, Prakasam District. 4 The Tahsildar / Mandal Revenue Officer, Kanigiri, Prakasam District. 5 B. Srinivasa Reddy S/o. Late B. Rama Subba Reddy R/o. H.No.7-1-553/3B, Rajasri Residency, Plot No.3B, S.R. Nagar, Hyderabad. 6 B. Malakonda Reddy S/o. Late B. Rama Subba Reddy R/o. Pathuru, Kanigiri, Kanigiri Mandal, Prakasam District. 7 B. Seshamma W/o. Late Dasaradharami Reddy R/o. Pathuru, Kanigiri Town & Mandal, Prakasam District. 8 K. Srinivasulu Reddy S/o. Venkatarami Reddy R/o. Pathuru, Kanigiri Town & Mandal, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.T.C.D.SEKHAR Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for Respondent Nos.5 to 8: ----- The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents 1 to 4 in issuing the proceedings vide RC. F/1780/2008 dated 09.01.2009 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of natural justice and violative of Art. 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents not to interfere with the business of the petitioner-firm pending disposal of the above writ petition.” Sri T.C.D.Sekhar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, sought for permission for withdrawal of the Writ Petition. The request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is accepted. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, interim order, dated 29-01-2009, is vacated, W.P.M.P.No.1163 of 2009 is dismissed and W.V.M.P.No.363 of 2009 and W.P.M.P.No.1385 of 2009 are disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 2nd July, 2009 lur