IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1269 OF 2000 PETITION NO.1269 OF 2000 PETITION NO.1269 OF 2000 Shri Deenanath N. Patni..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors..Respondents None present for the Petitioner Mr. Milind More, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: DATE: DATE: 27TH NOVEMBER,2006 27TH NOVEMBER,2006 27TH NOVEMBER,2006 P.C. . None present for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner’s vehicle was seized as it did not have the necessary PUC certificate. The grievance of the petitioner is that though he was willing to pay a sum of Rs.1,000/- the same has not been accepted by the respondents. 2. If the vehicle is still in the custody of the respondents it will be open to the petitioner to move the respondents for release of the vehicle by paying the necessary fine and if such an application is made the respondents to dispose of the same according to law at any rate not later than four months from the date of the application. With the above observation petition stands disposed of. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA J). V. MOHTA J). V. MOHTA J).