IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-9253 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.03.2011 Lalit Tuteja .... Petitioner Versus Anuradha Tuteja ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present : Mr. Raman Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? RITU BAHRI J. (ORAL) Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 8.2.2011 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Chandigarh by which order dated 27.8.2009 granting interim maintenance to the child – Himakshi Tuteja has been modified from ` 4000/- to ` 10,000/- per month from the date of filing of the application. Counsel for the petitioner has argued that enhancement of maintenance from ` 4000/- to ` 10,000/- is without any justification. The child is a minor and as an interim measure ` 4000/- was sufficient. In view of the fact that petitioner is working as Assistant Vice President in Branch Office of Axis Bank and drawing salary of Rs. 63,427/- per month, the order dated 8.2.2011 is affirmed. The petition is hereby dismissed. (RITU BAHRI) 28.03.2011 JUDGE reena