IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER THURSDAY, THE 4TH DECEMBER 2008 / 13TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1746 of 2008(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.37694/2004 Dated 05/10/2007 .................... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. BINU P.ULAHANNAN, SUB ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, PAMABAKUDA, PIRAVOM. 2. BINU VARGHESE, ASSISTANT ENGINEER, GENERATION DIVISION, EDAMALAYAR. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAMESH BABU RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. SRI.M.SUBAIR, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS SECRETARY, KSEB, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SRI.NARAYANAN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS CHIEF ENGINEER (HRM), KSEB, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV.SRI. K.S. ANIL-SC FOR KSEB THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: A.K.BASHEER, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cont.Case ( C ).No.1746 OF 2008-S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT Learned Standing Counsel for the Kerala State Electricity Board, who appears for the respondents herein, submits that the direction contained in the judgment has been complied with and appropriate orders have been passed on December 3, 2008. A copy of the said order is made available for perusal. However, learned counsel for the petitioners takes exception to the order passed by the respondents and submits that the said order does not in any way refer to the core issue which was agitated before this Court in the writ petition. 2. I do not propose to consider the correctness or otherwise of the above contention. If the petitioners are dissatisfied with the order, it would be open to them to impugn the same in appropriate other proceedings. This contempt of court case is closed with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the order, that is now passed by the respondents in other appropriate proceedings. (A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE) cl 2