1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Appli. No.6284/2007 (Vinay Dube Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : March 05, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Ms. Shalini Rathore, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the police investigation diary. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no evidence of transferring the amount in the account of the petitioner. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that the money has been transferred in the account of the petitioner through Suresh, who is son of Devi Lal Dangi. On careful perusal of the police investigation diary, it appears that there is prima facie evidence connecting the petitioner with the commission of the crime. In the 2 circumstances, therefore, in my view, it is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The bail application filed by the petitioner under section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-