IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9736 of 2011 Manju Kumari WIFE OF AVINASH PRSAD RESIDENT OF SAIDPUR, P.S. HISUA, DISTRICT NAWADAH. Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 2 05/09/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner was earlier ordered to be removed by the concerned authority when on an inspection it was found that this Angan Bari Centre was neither being run even during the schedule hours from 8 O’Clock to 12 O’Clock in the morning nor the Poshahar was being distributed to the beneficiaries. An appeal came to be filed before the Collector against the said order on the direction of the High Court issued earlier, contained in annexure-5. A defence was set up that inspection was conducted after working hours and on the date on which the inspection was carried out, petitioner was suffering from stomach ache and had gone for medical advice. All the submissions and explanations have been considered by the District Magistrate. Conduct of the petitioner has also been noticed that for similar kind of - 2 - abrasions, remuneration of the petitioner was also stopped with warning. This, however, did not improve the situation as on inspection the earlier position did not undergo a change which had seriously jeopardized the functioning of such centre creating serious impediment in reaching out to the mal-nourished children of the family coming from B.P.L. category. Conduct of the petitioner being such and findings being what they are coupled with the fact that the explanation offered by her did not satisfy the authorities because there was evidence supporting such a stand, the findings, therefore, given by the District Magistrate, Nawadah does not warrant interference. This writ application being devoid of merit is dismissed as there is no legal infirmity in the order impugned. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)