$l!\§§!-£ 3E} Hw @ Of [@ér IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.)i‘?33 OF 2011 IPETI’I‘IONER /' Smt. Lalita Pradhan W/o Shri Krishnanand Pradhan, aged about 46 years, Head Mistress, W . Governmsnt Girls Primaxy .‘... School, Block Dcvelopment 8a P. Q Kota, District \ Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) &é..u V E R S U S "WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT N" IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS' '? RESPONDENTS / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary) Department of School Education, ManLralaya, Dau Kalyan SinghBhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ,2. Director, Directorate of Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh, Raipur /3. Collector, DisLrict Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) /’4. District Education Officer Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) /5. Block Education Officer Block li)cvcloprnent, Kota, District Bilaspur (CG) KW HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 4739 of 2011 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Ashish Shrivastava with Shri Harsh Wardhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govemment Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 19 ‘day of August, 201 1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition on the ground that the petitioner wants to pursue his representation dated 28.07.2011 (Annexure P/12) pending before the respondent authorities. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no obj ection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated observation. Sd/- SATISH K. ANGNIHORI Judge PETITIONER : Smt. Lalita Pradhan. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others.