Petitioner ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHAJTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition fS) No.! 1425 of2009 Shukdeo S/o Balram Maha^ occupation^ Assisfant Teacher, Govemment Primary Schoot Ba^i^dala, Block Pussore, Distt. Raigarh (CG). VERSUlS Respondeiits 1. State of Chhattisgarfa fhrough the Seeretary, Department of E^ucation, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. f Raipur(CG). i [ 2. The Director, | Public Instmction Chhattisgarh Govemment, iRaipur (CG). 3. The District Edu&ation Officer, Distt. Raigarb (CG). 4. The Block Education Officer, Block Pussore, Distt. Raigarh(CG). (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONS'ITnJTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'fele Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Sahu Preseiit : Shri A.8. Rajput, Advocate fbrthepetitioner. Sliri Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advoeate Gerieral forthe State. QRALQRDER (Passed on 18th day ofMarch, 2009) I. With the conserrt ofthe parties, the matterJ is taketi up fbr hearing finally. 2. Leamed counsel appearing fbr the petitioner ma^ juniors have been proi^oted without specifying fheir names and date of appointmentonthefeedercadre/Hefurth ^ promotion ofallthe categories and m support offhe stMenientfhe petitioner does not want to file any documents. On repeated queries, neither documents have been produced nor has time been taken to produce the same except to repeat the same submission as stated above. It is difficult on the facts available to pass aiiy order or direction in the petition. 3. Thus, the matter is dismissed for want ofmaterial facts. No order asto costs. 4. Consequently, pending applications, ifany, stand disposed of. Sd/- Satish K-Agnihotri Judge