IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.24117-M of 2010 Date of Decision:29.9.2010 Dr. Anant Ram Barwala .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Abhishek Sethi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikram Jain, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) Reply by way of affidavit of Amrik Singh, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Hansi, on behalf of the State has been filed. The same is taken on record. As per the reply, it is submitted that during investigation, it was found that the Police Station Civil Lines, Hisar has got no jurisdiction to entertain the matter and Police Station, City Hansi has the territorial jurisdiction in the present matter. Accordingly, a cancellation report was prepared by the Station House Officer, Police Station, Civil Lines, Hisar on 21.8.2010 and the same has been forwarded to the Superintendent of Police, Hisar for further necessary action. The said cancellation report will be submitted in the Court of Illaqa Magistrate. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the reply, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 29.9.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE