IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) $§§§§3LE E%E§-§m~3 wRrr PETITION (227) No. HGE") 12011 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227, CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. PETITIONERS 1. Rajendra Kumar Mourya, (DEFENDANTS S/o Late Shri Suraj Prasad Mourya, NOS 1 TO 3) Aged about 55 years, R/o Chandan Awas, Tahsil and, District Bilaspur (CG.) 2. Jitendra Kumar Mourya, S/o Late Shri Suraj Prasad Mourya, h Aged about 36 years, R/o Construction Colony, Tahsil and, District Bilaspur (CG.) 3. Devendra Kumar Mourya (since deceased), represented through Legal Representatives : — Devika Mourya, Wd/o Late Devendra Kumar Mourya, 3.b. Pankaj Mourya, S/o Late Devendra Kumar Mourya, Both R/o Qrt. No. 1227/3, Bungalow Yard, Railway Bilaspur, Presently R/ o Indrapuri Mourya Bagicha, Indrapuri, Tifra, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG.) 1 ...............DEFENDANT N0. 1! VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. Bhagwat Prasad Sahu, S/o Late Shri Jhagaru Sahu, Aged about 71 years, R/o Village Indrapuri (Sirgitti), Tifra, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG.) 1------------PLAINTIFF! 2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : the Collector, Raipur (CG.) 1 ...............DEFENDANT N0. 4) Sahu .B. Hon’ble Shri Justice N.K. 1 1.04201 l Shri Sanjay S Agljawal, Advo ate for the petitioners. Shri Rishi Rahul Soni, Advo e for respondent No. l. Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel Lam/er for the State. for the petitioners, based on Learned counsel appearing information received on telephone, submits that civil suit itself has this petition has become already been decided, therefore, infructuous. In view of above, the petition i in&uctuous. No order as to costs. s dismissed as having become Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge mmm m [nae #frn S A rwal t c