IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13921 of 2009 1. SEEMA RANJAN KUMARI W/O MITHILESH KUMAR VERMA VILL.- MAI, P.S.- KANKO, DISTT.- JEHANABAD Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER JEHANABAD 3. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER JEHANABAD 4. THE PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR BIHAR SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, PATNA, BIHAR 5. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER KANKO BLOCK, DISTT.- JEHANABAD 6. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY PAJAURA GRAM PANCHAYAT, KANKO BLOCK, JEHANABAD 7. THE MUKHIYA PINJAURA GRAM PANCHAYAT, KANKO BLOCK, JEHANABAD ----------- 2. 4.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner claims to have been selected by the Aamsabha on 29.12.2008 for appointment as an Anganbari Sevika. The submission is that on a pretext of an alleged application questioning her eligibility, the matter is pending consideration unduly and the petitioner is being denied the benefit of the appointment. If the petitioner has been selected and there is no finding of her ineligibility, any consideration of complaint against her appointment has to be done within reasonable time. Let the District Programme Officer take such appropriate decision within a maximum period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before him. The writ application stands disposed with the aforesaid directions. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)