IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34493 of 2010 GOPAL KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.09.10. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is languishing in custody since 22.06.2010 in a case registered under Section 498(A) of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the D. P. Act. The impugned order reflects that the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail by this court on condition for payment of Rs. 3,000/- per month to wife. It is submitted that the petitioner could not avail the privilege of anticipatory bail because he is unable to pay Rs. 3,000/-per month to wife. Since the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail on merit and considering the period under custody, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Bhagalpur, in connection with Mojahidpur P.S. Case No. 125 of 2009 (G.R. No. 3481 of 2009). However, the grant of bail to 2 petitioner will not come in the way of deciding the maintenance to wife in a appropriate proceeding. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)