IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 9947 of 2008 Between: 1 Akula Satyanarayana S/o. Venkanna R/o. Vegeswarapuram Village, Tallapudi Mandal, West Godavari District. 2 Tirukovali Madan Rao S/o. Chakrapani R/o. H.No. 6-2-670, Flat No. 202, Anadlahari Residency, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The State of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secreatary to Revenue (Land Acquisition ) Department, Secreatariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 District Collector, West Godavari District at Eluru. 3 Land Acquisition Officer-cum-Revenue-Divisional Officer, Kovvur, West Godavari District. 4 Tahsildar, Tallapudi Mandal, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or driection more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in insisting petitioners to vacate from their small of site properties to notification in Roc.SW/230/07/G4, dt. 02.05.2007 issued by the 2nd respondent without following due process of law thereafter, as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, irrational, vivated by political malafides and contrary to the provisions of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and offends Article 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to disposes the petitioners from their respective sites of 387 square yards and 484 of square yards respectively covered by survey Numbers 289/1B and 289/1 of Vegeswarapuram Village and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : O R D E R:- The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded, and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 16th July, 2009 bcj