IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32326 of 2008 MADAN PRASAD GUPTA @ MANI @ MADAN KUMAR MANI & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 9.9.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioner no.1 is younger brother of the husband of the complainant, petitioner no.3 is his wife and petitioner nos.2 and 4 are son and daughter of petitioner no.1. They all are apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.1979C of 2007 registered for the offence under sections 498A, 323, 504 and 342 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are separate from the husband of the complainant. They have no concern with the affairs of complainant’s husband. The allegation of demand of dowry and torture.made in the complaint petition has no application in their case. Considering the facts, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. The petitioners, Madan Prasad Gupta @ Mani @ Madan Kumar Mani, Sanjeev Prasad Gupta @ Sanjeev Kumar, Shanti Devi and Anju Kumari are directed to surrender before the S.D.J.M., Araria within four weeks from today and on their so surrendering they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Araria in connection with Complaint Case No.1979C of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Md.S. (Mridula Mishra,J.) 2