IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2008 / 13TH JYAISHTA 1930 CRP.No. 886 of 2005() --------------------- AA.116/2000 of A.A.(LR),THRISSUR SM.167/1988 of LAND TRIBUNAL, MANJERI .................... REVN. PETITIONER: PETITIONER/APPELLANT: ----------------------------------------- KARAPOOLA ABDULLAKUTY, S/O. KOYA HAJI, KARAPOOLA HOUSE, NARUKARA AMSOM, DESOM, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.DINESH MATHEW J.MURICKEN SRI.P.V.BALAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. K. RAMANUNNI NAIR, S/O. KALLIANI AMMA, KARATTUTHODI HOUSE, MANJERI. 2. K. MOHANDAS RADHAKRISHNAN, S/O. KALLIANI AMMA, `RAMMIA', THIRUVANNUR POST, CALICUT. 3. K. CHANDRALEKHA, D/O. LEELAVATHI, `KRISHNA KRIPA', KANNIAMPURAM, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 4. K. MADHAVANKUTTY, S/O. LEELAVATHI, `KRISHNA KRIPA', KANNIAMPURAM, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 5. K. DESAVANUNNI, S/O. JANAKI AMMA, `KRISHNA KRIPA', KANNIAMPURAM, OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 6. K. LILLY, D/O. JANAKI AMMA, `KRISHNA KRIPA', KANNIAMPURAM, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 7. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON FOR R2 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. BINDU R FOR R7 THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M. SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. ------------------------------------------ CRP.No. 886/2005 & C.M. Appl. No.733/2005 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 3rd day of June, 2008 ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in view of the decison of this court in Jacob v. Vironi (2007 (4) KLT 641) remedy of the petitioner is only to approach the Appellate Authority (Land Reforms) to implead the legal heirs of the deceased 4th respondent and therefore this petition may be dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority (Land Reforms). The petition as well as the revision petition are therefore dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach Appellate Authority (Land Reforms) for appropriate reliefs. M. SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE Okb/-