Civil Writ Petition No.11472 of 2007(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M.No.5399 of 2011 and Civil Writ Petition No.11472 of 2007 Date of Order: 05.07.2011 M/s Hans Raj & Sons ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana etc. ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA Present:Mr. N.C.Kinra, Advocate for the applicant-petitioners. Mr. D.Khanna,Addl. A.G.,Haryana for respondent No.1 Mr. Raman B.Garg, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 to 4 Mr. Surinder Gandhi, Advocate for respondent no.5.. RAJIVE BHALLA, J (Oral) Prayer in this application is for disposal of the writ petition in terms of the compromise/settlement, appended with the application as Annexure P-7. Counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioners and respondent no.5 have settled their differences and reduced the settlement into a written compromise, Annexure P-7. It is submitted that in view of the settlement, the petitioners' firm would become absolute owner of the entire plot/shop no.9 as respondent no.5, M/s Gurditta Ram and Sons have sold the remaining half share to the petitioners. Civil Writ Petition No.11472 of 2007(O&M) -2- It is prayed that in view of the settlement, the writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the Chief Administrator, Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board, Panchkula and the Market Committee, Rohtak, for approval of the transfer of half share of shop no.9 to the petitioners and for renewal of the petitioners' license. Counsel for respondent no.5 does not deny the correctness of the averments in the application and states that he has no objection, if the writ petition is allowed. Counsel for contesting respondents no.2 to 4 submits that the respondents have no objection to the settlement or the transfer of half share to the petitioners but the petitioners shall be required to approach the respondents afresh for consideration of the validity of the transfer and whether in these circumstances, the petitioners can be granted a fresh license. In view of the settlement, the averments in the application, and the submissions made by counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of settlement Annexure P-7 and with liberty to the petitioners to approach respondents no.2 to 4 for approval of the transfer of shop no.9 in their favour and for renewal /grant of a fresh license. No order as to costs. July 05,2011 (RAJIVE BHALLA) nt JUDGE