IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18562 of 2008 SANTOSH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 3.7.2008 Heard the parties. The petitioner is an accused in a case under sections 392 and 411 of the Penal Code. A test identification parade was held in which two persons, namely, Tinku and Pinku were identified by the informant. Para 123 of the case diary does not disclose that this petitioner was identified by the informant. From the order of the court below it appears that the informant who is an Advocate appeared in court and disclosed the name of this petitioner as well as his nephew. The submission is that such disclosure in the case diary or in the court is at belated stage. Be that as it may, the petitioner Santosh Kumar is directed to be released on bail in Kotwali PS Case No. 270/2007 on furnishing bail bond of rupees ten thousand with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, with the conditions that he should cooperate during the trial of this case and should appear on each and every as and when required by the court and if he absents himself even for a single date without cause, his bail bond shall stand cancelled. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)