IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No : 10533 of 2007 Between: M.RAghu S/o. M.Nageswara Rao R/o. Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Govt. of A.P., Municipal Administration and Urban Development Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad Rep. by its Principal Secretary 2 The Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition, Unit VI, Outer Ring Road, Hderabad Urban Development Authority Tarnaka, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No : 10533 of 2007 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… … Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in acquiring the entire extent of Ac.3-01 guntas of Petitioner's land in Sy.No. 126 & 127 of Muthangi Village, Patancheru Mandal, Medak District, which is not the extent mentioned in the Notification published in the A.P. Gazette ORR. No. 80, dated 11/05/2006 as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and unconstitutional.” At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that after filing of the writ petition the petitioner received compensation. He therefore says that the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the abovementioned submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.13267 of 2007 and WVMP.Nos.1352 of 2007 are dismissed as infructuous. C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 25.02.2008 ES To 1.2CCs 2.2CD copies