Civil Revision No.6174 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 26.07.2011 Debi @ Jagdev Ram & anr. ....petitioners Versus Smt.Satya Rani & Ors. .....respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Vijay Lath,Advocate for the petitioners Mr.Sarju Puri, Advocate for the respondents **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL): Petitioner No.2 was evicted vide judgment dated 14.11.2003, passed by Rent Controller, Nawanshahar. Her appeal, challenging the aforesaid order was dismissed by the Appellate Authority,Nawanshahar, on 04.02.2008, holding the same as time barred. The present revision petition has been filed challenging the aforesaid orders. On 05th October, 2009, the following order was passed by this Court: Present: Mr.Vijay Lath, Advocate for the petitioners CM No.22210-CII of 2008 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 118 Civil Revision No.6174 of 2008 2 days in refiling the revision petition is condoned, subject to all just exceptions. C.R.No.6174 of 2008 It is stated that the petitioners belong to poorest section of the Society and have no shelter if evicted out of the subject house. In order to explore the possibility of a compromise, let notice of motion be issued for 14.12.2009. Records be sent for. Meanwhile, dispossession shall remain stayed. 05.10.2009 -sd- (Surya Kant) Judge Thereafter, the case is being adjourned from time to time to explore the possibility of compromise. However, this Court is of the view that compromise is not possible. Since the notice of motion was issued only to explore the possibility of compromise, this Court has no option but to dismiss the instant revision petition. Ordered accordingly. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has stated that petitioner No.1 has already died and petitioner No.2 is an old lady of 75 years and she belongs to the poorest section of the society and has no shelter, if evicted out of the demised premises. Keeping in view the prayer made, it is observed that in case the petitioner relinquishes the possession of the house in dispute to the respondent-landlord and thereafter makes a representation to the Deputy Commissioner, Nawanshahar for making some arrangement for her shelter in some old age home or any other institution such a representation shall Civil Revision No.6174 of 2008 3 be considered, sympathetically, without losing any time. Disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 26.07.2011 neenu