1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4681 OF 2007 Ramchandra Gundu Harane. ...Petitioner. vs. 1.Sou.Akkatai Sakharam Dinde and others. ...Respondents. --- Mr.R.P.Walvekar, for Petitioner. Mr.P.M.Arjunwadkar, for Respondents. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 25th April,2008. P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for both the sides. The appeal Court has given cogent reasons for granting temporary injunction in favour of the 2 plaintiff. Except the panchanam which was alleged to have been made by the Tahasildar about existing construction on the land, there was no other evidence produced by the defendant-petitioner to show that there was any existing construction which was washed away because of rain. The appeal Court has correctly dealt with the panchanama. According to the appeal Court among other reasons, the panchanama cannot be relied on because it does not mention survey number of the land in relation to which the panchanama has been made. 2. Taking overall view of the matter therefore, I find no reason to interfere with the order of the appeal Court. The petition is therefore, rejected. ---