THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No. 22598 of 2011 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice N.V. Ramana) Questioning the notice dated 26.05.2011 issued by the 2nd respondent, under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short ‘the Act’),the petitioner filed the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. As the petitioner did not repay the loan amount, the 2nd respondent has initiated proceedings under the provisions of the Act. The petitioner, having not shown violation of any of the procedures by the bank in the recovery of the loan amount due and payable by him, is not entitled to seek interference of this Court, preventing the bank from proceeding in accordance with law for recovery of the loan amount. This apart, it is brought to the notice of the Court that subsequent to the impugned notice, the bank has also issued notice under Section 13(4) of the Act, on 05.10.2011. The petitioner, if he so chooses, is at liberty to challenge the said notice. The writ petition is devoid of merit and is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _____________ N.V. RAMANA, J _________________ P. DURGA PRASAD, J 20th October, 2011 IBL