[1] IN THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 464 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 71 OF 2008 M/s. Permanant Magnets Ltd. ... Appellant. [Original Petitioner] Versus. Gajanan Laxmikant Borkar and Ors. ... Respondents. [Orig. Respondents.] Mr. Jayprakash Sawant for the appellant. Mr. R.D.Bhatt for the respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : D.K.Deshmukh and : D.K.Deshmukh and : D.K.Deshmukh and A.A.Sayed, A.A.Sayed, A.A.Sayed, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : January 19, 2009. : January 19, 2009. : January 19, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel on both sides. 2. On appreciating the evidence on record, the Industrial Court has held that the provisions of Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [2] have not been complied with. The learned Single Judge has re-appreciated the evidence and confirmed the findings of the Industrial Court. We find no reason to interfere with the same. The Appeal is rejected. [D.K.Deshmukh, [D.K.Deshmukh, [D.K.Deshmukh, J.] J.] J.] [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, J.] J.] J.]