IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42429 of 2010 SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV @ SANTOSH YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 05.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is not named in the FIR but during investigation, the informant and some other witnesses have stated about the complicity of the petitioner and other accused in the alleged occurrence. The contention of Learned counsel for the petitioner is that much prior to institution of the instant case, the informant had filed a Criminal Case against the petitioner and his family members and in the said case, the petitioner and his brothers were sent to jail custody. He further points out that at the time of alleged occurrence, the petitioner was languishing in jail custody in connection with above said criminal case. Admittedly, none of the persons has seen the actual killing of the deceased of this case and the name of this petitioner came in this case on the basis of circumstantial evidence, so considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions of the parties, the petitioner, namely, Santosh Kumar Yadav @ Santosh Yadav is directed to be released on bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sour Bazar P.S. Case No. 339 of 2009 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)