HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Cr. M.P. No,210 Qf 20$6 (Petition Ills 432 of the; Code of mimigal Pxocedma Janakl‘am, s} o Jhadooram Gabe}, ag6d about 47 years, village Botalda, tah. Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh CG). APPLICANT VERSUS n; Aggearance: ‘ Shri Viprasen Agrawal, counsel for the app1icant. Shn' CnKV Beriwal, Dy.A.G. for the State. ORAL ORDER 111.04.2007a sunil Kama: $inha, J, Heard on admission. This petition is directed against the order dated 09.3.2005 J passed in Criminal Revision No.208] 2004 by the IV Addl. Sessions Judge, Rajgarh, by which after ailowing the revision of the petitioner, he has remanded. the matter to the concen‘ted Sub— /‘ NON-APPLICANT 1.. Jhadool‘am, Sfo GhaSimm «‘g Gabe}, aged about 7O years, 2. Medni Prasad) §;0 Jhadooram Gabe}, agéd about 48 years, 3. Umesh Kumar, s/o Manohar Gabel, aged about 29 years, All residenis of village Botalda, Tall. Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (CG) 4. State of Chhatfjsgar‘n; Through the District Magistratc Raigarh, (QG) CnM‘Rbb 11o 12097 Divisiona} Magistlat€ for dispassa]. of the: C956: in accowlance wifh the 13W. He has aka issuafj ccrtain (liréctions in para 22 0f the impugned. 0rd m“. The brief facts,aS $fated by karnad cmmsa for the yetitimmr) are. that this petitionm‘ had filEd an appHcation 11f s 145 0f Cr.P.C. abngwith an ay§1ication His; 146 Cr.P.C. before fhe Caurt of concarned Sub Divisional Magistrate. The Sub Divisionai Magistrate, mgistared the mafia as Misc. CaSe No. 1755,12004. After hearing the parties, the eaid Court dismissed the amiiications 11/ s 145 gig 146 of C1‘.P.C. on 23.11.2004 hoiding that the peijtion does not disciose the correct id enfiiicaticn of the pm‘peliy in dispute as The petitioner has not mentioned Khasra Nuinher and extent cf the land etc , Against the said order the (‘riniinai revision was Ned and it was alloWe(i hv the Qessions Judge and the matter was remanded to the concerned Magistiate With a diiectimi Vide tiara 2? that the Magistrate Wiii get (‘onect Khasra min her and extent of the land iii dispute fmin the narties and thereaftei he shall moceed in. accordance Wlth law. lt. is against. this order, the. petitionei has tiled this Misc. Petition. l do not find any illegality in the order passed hy the. Sessions f; Judge. ln fact, the relief granted to the petitioner was the maximum celief which was granted by the Sessions Judge and there Was no cause of action to proceed further invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court ii] s 482 Cr.P.C. This petition has no merits and the saint: is dismissed at the motion stage itself. / Sdl— SUNIL KUMAR SINHA Judge . \ \