(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 88 OF 2009 (In Writ Petition No. 5140 of 2008) Atmaram s/o. Gorakh Malke, Age : 50 years, Occupation : Agriculture, .. Applicant R/o. Virvade, Tal. Chopda, (Original Dist. Jalgaon. petitioner) versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32. 2. The Collector, Jalgaon. 3. Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nasik Division, Nasik, Through Divisional Social Welfare Officer, Nasik. 4. Miss Prajakta d/o. Gajendrasingh Jadhao, Age : 22 years, Occupation : Education, C/o. Shri Gajendrasingh Siratsingh Patil, Lecturer, G.T. Patil College, Nandurbar, Taluka & Dist. Nandurbar. 5. Shri Gulabrao Kharat, Age : 45 years, Occupation : Govt. Service, Presently as District Supply Officer, .. Respondents C/o. Collectorate, Ahmednagar, (Original Tal. and Dist. Ahmednagar. respondents) .................. (2) Mr. R.R. Mantri, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. P.M. Shinde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr. C.K. Shinde, Advocate, for respondent no.3. Mr. S.B. Talekar, Advocate, for respondent no.4. Mr. B.R. Warma, Advocate, for respondent no.5. .................. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & S.P. DAVARE, JJ. DATE : 25TH JUNE 2009. COURT’S ORDER : 1. The petitioner seeks review of the order passed by this court, dated 12th January 2009. Vide the order under review, we had dismissed the said petition. 2. Mr. R.R. Mantri, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant (original petitioner), submits that while dismissing the petition, this court has dismissed on two grounds, firstly, that the petitioner has no locus, and secondly, on the basis of the order passed by the Division Bench, dated 29th July 2008, in Writ Petition No. 4491/2008. He submits that once the caste certificate was granted in favour of the respondent no.4 herein, she had no occasion to file the said petition and get the orders that were passed in the said petition. He submits that the petitioner has already moved for review of the said order. (3) 3. The main relief claimed in the petition is for a declaration that the caste certificate issued in favour of the respondent no.4 is invalid and for confiscation and cancellation of the same. While dismissing the writ petition, we have taken into consideration the order passed by the Division Bench of this court in Writ Petition No. 4491/2008, dated 29th July 2008. The Division Bench in the said case has clearly observed that the petitioner's (respondent no.4 herein) caste certificate stands validated. The Division Bench has further observed that as the petitioner already has caste validity certificate, that certificate be treated as caste validity certificate issued in favour of the petitioner. 4. Since coordinate Bench of this court has already validated the caste claim of the respondent no.4, we do not find that any error has been committed by us in dismissing Writ Petition No. 5140/2008. We are afraid, that so long as order passed in Writ Petition No. 4491/2008 stands, invoking of review jurisdiction would not be permissible for this court. No error, apparent on the face of record, is noticed so as to warrant review jurisdiction. 5. Hence, the Review Application is dismissed. ( S.P. DAVARE ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ...................... bgp/ra88