1 MCA No. 26 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 26 OF 2010 Kiran Gajanan Kale, Age 26 years, Occu. Student, R/o Jagruti Nagar, Near Rajajrajshwari Hall, Jail Road, Nashik Road, Tq. & Dist. Nashik Applicant V E R S U S Gajanan Nivrutti Kale, Age 30 years, Occu. Service R/o Vidya Nagar, Hingoli, Tq. & Dist. Hingoli Respondent Mr. S.S. Gangakhedkar, Advocate for the appellant Mr. R.V. Gore, Advocate for respondent CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 8th February, 2011 ORAL ORDER 1. Heard. Application is allowed. The H.M.P. No. 36 of 2010 stands transferred to the Court of Civil Judge, Nashik. REASONS Within one year from the date of marriage, it seems that the things went wrong between the spouses and they started staying at different places. The applicant / wife went to her father's house at Nashik, whereas the husband has been staying at Jalgaon, where he has a job. The respondent / husband filed divorce petition against the wife at Hingoli Court saying their marriage took place at Hingoli. The respondent / husband at present does not stay at Hingoli. The 2 MCA No. 26 of 2010 applicant / wife, as said above, stayed with her father at Nashik. She filed Criminal case against the husband at Nashik Court. These facts clearly show that even the respondent / husband would come to Hingoli for the purpose of attending the litigation he started. So, it would be in the interest of justice to transfer his case to the Civil Court Nashik. Nashik is a place closer to Jalgaon, whereas Hingoli is a place away from both Nashik as well as Jalgaon. If the divorce petition filed by the husband is transferred to Nashik Court, it would be convenient for both the parties. In view of this, the present application stands allowed. ( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. ) SDM*MCA 26.11/080211