IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1539 of 2011 SHYAM BARAN THAKUR @ TULO THAKUR @ HULKA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 10.02.2011 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Initially F.I.R. was lodged against several other persons with the allegation that the deceased had given Rs. 7 to 8 lacs to one Munna Singh and due to that victim was killed. Petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. It appears from the impugned order that para 44 of the case diary contains the statement of the wife of the victim suggesting that victim in injured condition named certain persons including one Hulka and the petitioner’s @ name is Hulka also. Hence not only suspicion has been raised against the petitioner on that basis but charge sheet has been submitted on the same basis. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that one similar situated co-accused person has been granted anticipatory bail by a Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 31724 of 2008. The aforesaid submissions are good grounds for grant of regular bail. Let the petitioner appear before learned Court below to Consider the fact that only 2 suspicion has been raised against the petitioner and other similar situated co-accused person has already been granted anticipatory bail. Let the learned court below consider for regular bail of the petitioner on undertaking the petitioner that he will appear regularly during trial. With the above observation the petition is disposed off. Bhardwaj ( Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)