1 CA6458.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6458 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER STAMP NO. 12293 OF 2011 Prakash s/o Hiraman Bhill, Age:40 years, Occ: Labour, R/o.Utaran Gujar Hadda, Tq. Erandol, Dist. Jalgaon and others. ...APPLICANTS VERSUS The District Collector, Jalgaon, Tq. & Dist. Jalgaon and others. ...RESPONDENTS ... Mr. Pramod Gaikwad,Advocate holding for Mr. A.G. Talhar, Advocate for applicants. Mr. D.V. Tele, A.G.P. for State-respondents. ... CORAM: S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 16TH SEPTEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard. 2. Perused the contents of the application. 2 CA6458.11 Many grounds are taken in the application for condonation of delay. The applicants have contended that, they have filed appeal before the Additional Commissioner, Nashik. Said appeal came to be rejected on 23-06-2010. The applicants are prosecuting the appeal before the Additional Commissioner, Nashik. They were under bonafide impression that the subject matter of the appeal and the suit is one and the same. However, their appeal came to be rejected in the month of June 2010 and thereafter they have filed writ petition before this Court and in the said writ petition, this Court has issued Rule and the said writ petition is awaiting its turn for final hearing. 3. Apart from the reasons stated in the application, it appears that, the applicants are tribal and therefore, in my opinion, though there is an inordinate delay of 515 days in filing the application for condonation of delay in filing the Appeal from Order, it deserves to be condoned in the light of the sufficient cause disclosed in the 3 CA6458.11 application. Hence, the Civil Application for condonation of delay is allowed and same stands disposed of. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/SEP11