IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH JUNE 2010 / 26TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 2984 of 2010(W) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SAROJINI, W/O.MOHANAN, KAVIRAYIL HOUSE, PATTIKKAD, TRICHUR. 2. P.CHANDRASEKHARAN, PERINCHERY HOUSE, PATTIKKAD, TRICHUR. 3. KAMALAMMA, PERINCHERY HOUSE, PATTIKKAD, TRICHUR. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.ASOKAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, TRICHUR. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TRICHUR. 3. COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, TRICHUR. 4. CONVENOR, SREE DHARMASASTHA TEMPLE PUNAR NIRMANA COMMITTEE, SREE DHARMASASTHA TEMPLE, PATTIKKAD, TRICHUR. 5. PANANCHERRY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PANANCHERRY, TRICHUR. ADV. SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP,SC,COCHIN D.B FOR R1&3 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI.K.RAMESH ADV.S.B.PREMA CHANDRA PRABHU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).No. 2984/10. APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS P1. COPY OF THE SURVEY SKETCH. P2. COPY OF THE PLAINT IN OS.NO.3606/04 BEFORE THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, THRICHUR. P2A. COPY OF THE ADVOCATE COMMISSION REPORT. P3. COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT DTD.30.11.04. P4. COPY OF THE APPEAL BEFORE R2 AND R3 21.10.09. P5. COPY OF THE order OF R1 DTD.13.1.2010. P6. COPY OF THE APPEAL BEFORE R2 DTD.26.1.2010. P6A. COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION DTD.26.1.2010 BEFORE R2. sdk+ ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge S S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 2984 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 16th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T Proceedings have been initiated against the petitioners under the Kerala Land Conservancy Act and Rules in respect of certain properties in possession of the petitioners. The Special Tahsidlar, Cochin Devaswom Board decided against the petitioners, by Ext.P5 order. Against the same, the petitioners filed Ext.P6 appeal before the 2nd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, which is pending. Apprehending dispossession pending disposal of the appeal, the petitioners have filed this writ petition. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 3. I am of opinion that this writ petition itself can be disposed of by directing the 2nd respondent-RDO to pass final orders on Ext.P6 appeal. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to pass final orders on Ext.P6, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to petitioners. Till orders are thus passed, the interim order passed by this Court in this case would continue to be in force. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2