HiGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BtLASPUR DIViS!ON BENCH Coram : HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. & HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. APPLICANT Co-PlaintiJT IVI.C.C.No.42of2007 Hari Narayan Sharma aged about 69 years, S/o Shri Shampat Lai, R/o Amapara; in front of Super Colony, Raipur (C.G.) Versus NON-APPLICAN7S u 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Smt. Abha Dixit aged about 43 years, wd/o Late Ashok Dixit, R/o Malviya Road, Opposite Bombay Show Room, Raipur (C.G.) Ku. Rashi D/o Late Ashok Dixit, aged about 14 years, Minor represented through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Abha Dixlt, Wd/o Late Ashok Dixit, R/o Malviya Road, Opposite Bombay Show Room, Raipur (C.G.) Rahul Di?(it S/o Late Ashok Dixit aged about 20 years. Ku. Ritu Dixit, D/o Late Ashok Dixit aged about 17 years (SVSinor) Resp. No.4 Mlnor represented through guardian Smt. Purnima Tiwari W/o Shri Rajesh Tiwari, Resp. no.3 & 4 R/o Station Chowk, Raipur (C.G.) Smt. Sunita Tiwari W/o Shri Paras Dixit, R/o Nagpur (MS) Smt. Geeta Shukla, W/o Shri Rakesh Kumar Shukla, R/o Nagpur No. 5 to 6 through attorney holder Smt. Pumima Tjwari, W/o Rajesh Tiwari, Station Chowk Raipur (C.G.) Smt. Purnima Tiwari W/o Rajesh Tlwari, Statlon Chowk Ralpur (C.G.) ^ 8. Station House Officer, Police Station KotwaSi, Kotwalj ChowR, Raipur (C.G.) (Defendants) 9. Manohar Lal Sharma aged about 54 years, S/o Sampat Lai, R/o Amapara, in front of Super Colony, Raipur (C.G.) (Co-PJainfif^ APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF THE CIVIL REVISION Present: Shri S.S. Rajput, learned counsel for the petitloner. Shri P.P. Sahu, learned counsel for respondent No.1. None for respondents No. 2 to 9. ORDER (22"a Qctober, 2008) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, CJ.: Learned counse! for the parties are heard on M.C.P. No.215/2007, a petition for condonation of delay in filing the restoration petition. 2. On due consideration, M.C.P. No. 215/2007 is allowed and the delay in filing the restoration petjtion is hereby condoned. 3. Learned counsei for the parties are heard on the restoration petitlon. 4. The petitioner is seeking restoration of Civil Revision No.2535/1999, which was dismissed forwant of prosecution vide orderdated 22-07-2005. 5. On due CQnsideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and the grounds taken in the restoration petitjon, we are satisfied that the absence of the petitioner's counsei on ''-^ ^ 22-07-2005 when Civil Revision No. 2535/1999 was taken up for hearing, was based on bona fide grounds. 6. M.C.C. No. 42/2007, therefore, is allowed and Clvil Revjslon No.2535/1999 is restored to its original number. I Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge nimms if ! ^