TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.LAXMAN CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL NO: 101 OF 2001 Appeal under Section 96 of CPC against the Judgment and decree dated 71412001 in OS No.222l1997 on the file of the Court of the ll Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Between: Smt.Padmavathi, W/o. late Narayan Murthy, D/o.late Yashoda Bai, aged 60 years, Occ: Pensioner, R/o.4-1-735, Tuljaguda, Mazamjahi Market, Hyderabad. ...APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF AND 1. M.Venkat Rao, S/o.late M.R.Naidu, aged about 55 years, Occ: Service, R/o.Head of the Department, Political Science, Branben University, Branben, Candada. 2. The A.P. Co-operative Non-Gazetted Employees Association, rep. by its Geneal Secretary, Hyderabad. 3. Government of A.P., rep. by the District Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad District. .,.RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to direct all the parties to the OS No.222 of 1997 on the file of the Court of the Second Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, and who are the parties herein, not to alienate or change the physical features of the property in question covered by Ex.A-1 and Ex.B-1 in the said Suit i.e, Land admeasuring 225 sq.yards, or '188.10 sq.metres. situated in ltilunicipal No.4-1-735 at Tuljaguda, l\rloazamjahi Market, Hyderabad City. Pending disposal of the instant regular appeal on the file of this Hon'ble Court and to pass such other order or orders as deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and interest of justice. For the Appellant : SRI S.R.SANKU, Advocate (not present) Forthe Respondent No.1 : SRI P.NAGA PRADEEP, Advocate The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD CMP. NO: 9732 OF 2001 THE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.LAXMAN CITY C] VIL COURT APPEAL NO.IOT OF 2OO1 JUDGMENT: When the matter is posted for dismissa-l, there is no representation frc n the appellant. 2. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending if any shall stand closed. Sd/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR ai SECTION OFFICER To //TRUE COPY' '1. The ll SeniorCir I Judge, CityCivil Court, Hyderabad 2. One CC to Sri S R.Sanku, Advocate (OPUC) - ^ 3. One CC to Sri P \aga Pradeep, Advocate (OPUU) 4. Two CD CoPies 5. One SPare CoPt. Kj. ). DATED:1611112021 CCCA.No.101 of 200' DISMISSING THE At PEAL FOR NON.PROSECUTION. ?9/'.,Y 0b\ d HIGH COURT JUDGMENT ..1 "\ ,1 a 15li-trifl