IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15166 of 2011 KISHAN SINGH @ KRISHNA SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 18.05.2011 Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Didarganj P.S. Case No. 175 of 2010 registered under Sections 461, 379 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. The theft was committed in the house of informant as well as from shop of Suresh Choudhary but the articles stolen from shop of Suresh Choudhary was recovered from the house of the petitioner. It is alleged that the informant has identified the stolen articles. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that recovery has been made from the community hall and not from house of this petitioner and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Moreover, the informant has retracted from his initial version and filed a petition to that effect before the learned court below. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner 2 and try to dispose off the same preferably on the same day, if possible, keeping in mind that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and the informant has retracted from his initial version if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, in connection with Didarganj P.S. Case No. 175 of 2010 at the cost of the petitioner. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)