1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1089 OF 2010 Prabha V. Yadav ...Appellant. v. Nupur Zankar Academy and Anr. ...Respondents. Ms Seema Gupta i/by Shri Ashok M. Saraogi, advs for the Appellant. Mr.Prakash U. Shind a/w Shri Nishit Dhruva and Partners, advs., for the respondent no.2. CORAM : J.H.Bhatia, J. DATE : 20th September, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard. The plaintiff/appellant had sought permission from the respondent no.1 to run Yoga classes in its premises and that permission was granted subject to the plaintiff paying 35% of the total fees collected by her, as per the letter dated 1.4.2010. Later on, by letter dated 30th June, 2010, respondent no.1 informed the plaintiff that it would not be possible to make available premises for the Yoga classes with immediate effect. The plaintiff took out notice of motion in the suit for injunction. The trial Court refused to grant ad­interim relief pending the notice of motion. Notice of Motion is listed on 15th October, 2010. The learned counsel for the respondent states that Yoga classes are already closed. It appears that the learned counsel for 2 the plaintiff has no instructions as to whether Yoga classes are stopped or still being run. In view of these circumstances, following directions will meet the ends of justice: (i) The trial Court shall hear the notice of motion and dispose off the same within four weeks from this date. 2 Appeal and the application stand disposed off accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA, J.)