^ (^^?;^0^ s'< ^l' S.B. (Service Matter) INTHEiiQN'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHA^ISGARHl WRIT PETITION(S) N0. 560^/ 2009. PETITIONER: ^JM .^^s^ ^•..^ Q^tiV3t\€^^r_ Bh^nesfewar Prasad Patel, son of Kynjram Patel, aged abQut 41 year§, ^y^ °} working as Peon (Waterman) Govt. Higher Secondary School Telikpt, Kharsia, Tahsil Kharsi^, District Raigarh, Chh^tti^garh. ^^' Respondents versus 1. State Qf Chhattisgarh, Througli Secretary, Tribal Welfare Depeu^tment, D.K.S. Bh9.wan, Raipvr, Chhattisgarh. r" 2. Commis^ioner, Tribal Welfar^ pepartment, Raipur, Chhs.ttisga.rh. 3. Assistant CommissiQner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raigarh, District , Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 4. Collector, (Tribal Welfare ^ranch) District Raiggj-h, Chh^ttisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^" •NN^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILA8PUR WRIT PETmON (S) No. 5007 of2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENT8 Bfauwneshwar Prasad Patel. VERSUS State (xfChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUnON OF INDIA SB: Hon^ble Shri Satlsh K. Agiiiliotoi, J. Present: Shri GJ.K.Raa Advocate tbr the petitioiier. SIiri A.V.Sliridhar, Paiiel Lawyer forthe State/'respoiideiite. ORDERrORAL) (Passed on 12th day of November, 2009) !„ Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioxier, on inslructions, seeks pemiission ofthis Court to withdraw this petitioii with liberty te make rq?resentaticm to the res{xmdent-airthorities in fhe light of some deciidons passed by this Court ^ w@Jl as by the Supreme Court. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for o-tfaer side has ao objecticm, 3. It is ordered as prayed for. 4. Consequently, the writ petitien is dismissed as witfadrawn with the aforestated liberty, ifso advised. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Axmt