IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20772 of 2010 MOHABUL @ GADDU, S/o Mohibur, R/o Village- Mahanandpur, P.O.-Mallikpara, P.S.-Chanchal, District- Malda(West Bengal). Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Shabina Yasmin, D/o TAslimuddin, R/o Vill: Raghunathpur(Chaitola), P.S.-Abadpur, Distt.-Katihar. ----------- 3. 14-07-2010 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under sections 376, 364, 366 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegation for the offence under section 376 IPC is against co-accused Nasim and Mabu Ali and not against this petitioner, rather statement recorded u/s 164 Cr.P.C. suggests that it was the petitioner, who was suggesting to reach the victim to her grand-father’s house. Considering the nature of allegation at present I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, learned court below will consider the regular bail of the petitioner without being prejudiced by the present order of this court. With this observation, the application is disposed of. Sujit (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)