IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA THURSDAY, THE 20TH MAY 2010 / 30TH VAISAKHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 2875 of 2010() ----------------------------- CRMP.2825/2010 of J.M.F.C.-II,THRISSUR CRIME NO.212/10 OF NEDUPUZHA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR. .................... (S): PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 & 2 ------------------------------------------------ 1. SANDEEP.S/O.GANGDHARAN, KUNNAMPATH HOUSE, VATTAPONNI DESOM, KANIMANGALAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR. 2. SHINU, S/O.SREENIVASAN, VADAKKUMPARAMBIL HOUSE,PUTHOORKARA DESOM, PULLAZHI VILLAGE, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.M.B.PRAJITH RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------- 1. STATE REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NEDUPUZHA POLICE STATION (CRIME NO.212/2010,NEDUPUZHA POLICE STATION) PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.TEK CHAND. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.HEMA, J. ---------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.2875 of 2010 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 20th May, 2010. O R D E R This petition is for bail. 2. The alleged offence is under Section 332 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. According to prosecution, on 15.4.2010, at about 11.30 p.m., petitioners (A1 and A3) along with others, in furtherance of common intention caused obstruction to the discharge of official duty by the Sub Inspector of Police and other police officials at a temple premises, when they tried to prevent some untoward incident. When a Ganamela was going on, the unruly mob was creating trouble in the premises and hence the police intervened. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners were called to the Police Station on 15.4.2010 in the morning itself and they had not even gone to the temple premises on that day. This is a false case, it is submitted. 4. This petition is opposed. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that petitioners were arrested from the spot. Accused No.1 is involved in 10 other cases and accused No.3 is involved in BA NO.2875/10 2 two other cases. The other accused are not so far arrested. In such circumstances, if petitioners are released on bail, it will adversely affect the prosecution. 5. I am satisfied of the submissions made by the learned Public Prosecutor and I am satisfied that it is not a fit case to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. Petition is dismissed. K.HEMA, JUDGE. tgs