IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH JULY 2010 / 23RD ASHADHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 4026 of 2010() ----------------------------- PETITIONERS (S): ------------------------------- 1. BEEFATHIMA , W/O.ABDUL KAREEM RESIDING AT POTHUKADAVU, AYITTI, KASARGOD DISTRICT 2. MUSTHAFA, S/O.ABDUL RASAQ, RESIDING AT OLAVARA, SOUTH THRIKARIPUR VILLAGE, KASARGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.T.SUDHAMANI RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR. M.S. BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sou. K. HEMA, J ---------------------- B.A.No.4026 OF 2010 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of July, 2010 O R D E R This petition is for anticipatory bail. 2. The alleged offences are under sections 498(A) and 309 IPC. According to prosecution, first accused married defacto complainant on 14.3.2010. Thereafter the husband and his relatives ill treated her demanding more dowry. On 14.4.2010 defacto complainant and first accused were at the parental house of defacto complainant and first accused hit her against a wall and beat her demanding dowry. After the incident first accused attempted to commit suicide. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that main allegations are against first accused. Petitioners are mother-in- law and brother-in-law of defacto complainant. 4. Learned public prosecutor also conceded that main allegations are against first accused. He reported no objection in granting anticipatory bail to petitioners. B.A. No.4062/10 2 5. On hearing both sides, I am satisfied that anticipatory bail can be granted. Hence the following order is passed: 1) Petitioners shall, in the event of arrest, be released on bail, on their executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- each with two solvent securities each for the like amount to the satisfaction of arresting officer on the following conditions: i) Petitioners shall report before the investigating officer as and when directed and co-operate with investigation. ii) Petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the witnesses or tamper with evidence. 2) This order will be in force only for a period of 15 days. In the meantime, petitioner shall seek regular bail from court concerned. K. HEMA, JUDGE. Sou.