IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC NO.9341 OF 2007 RAMCHANDRA PRASAD,S/O YOGENDRA PRASAD, VILLAGE AND P.O PAURA, P.S GOGRI, DISTRICT KHAGARIA. …………………PETITIONER. VERSUS 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 2.THE DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION, SECRETARIATE, PATNA. 3.THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MUNGER. 4.THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, LAKHISARAI, DISTRICT LAKHISARAI. 5.THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, LAKHISARAI, DISTRICT LAKHISARAI. ………………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02/ 13.10.2011 Heard counsel for the parties. In this writ application, the petitioner seeks direction to the Authorities to treat the training course undergone by the petitioner from Oxford College of Education, Calcutta to be a valid degree for appointment on the post of teacher in Panchayat/Prakhand/Zila Parishad. Counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner has passed senior teachers training course from Oxford College of Education, Calcutta as would be evident from the certificate dated 26.12.1994, and therefore, he should be 2 treated to be qualified for the post of teacher as per the 2006 Rules framed by the State Government for appointment of teachers on the post of Panchayat Teacher/Prakhand Teacher/High School teacher. Counsel for the petitioner also relies on the orders dated 01.06.2007 passed in C.W.J.C NO. 6105 of 2007 and another order dated 08.05.2007 passed in C.W.J.C NO.12460, whereby and whereunder, this court had directed the Authorities to examine the equivalence of the qualification of the teachers training course of Oxford College of Education, Calcutta. In the considered opinion of this Court, when the State Government had already issued exhaustive list of the institutions whose degree of teachers training is to be accepted as valid for the purposes of appointment of the teachers under 2006 Rules, any person not covered by said list of institutes, infact cannot claim his appointment on the post of teacher as a matter of right. The equivalence of qualification and the 3 training course undergone by the petitioner cannot be adjudicated in a writ jurisdiction. Keeping, however, in view that this Court had made certain observations for disposal of representation in the orders dated 01.06.2007 passed in C.W.J.C NO. 6105 of 2007 and another order dated 08.05.2007 passed in C.W.J.C NO.12460 respectively, this Court would give liberty to the petitioner to file his self contained representation before the Principal Secretary of Human Resources Development Department and in case such a representation seeking equivalence of qualification by the petitioner is filed with necessary proof and/or documents, the same shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of filing of representation by the petitioner. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is disposed of. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)