IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39118 of 2009 PRAMOD CHOUDHARY, Son of Rajdeo Choudhary Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 11.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and was arrested thereafter on suspicion but has not been identified in the Test Identification, let the petitioner above named who is in custody since 27.06.2008 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 284 of 2007 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on - 2 - affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. It has been submitted that the petitioner is accused in only one other case i.e. Kotwali P.S. Case No. 99 of 2008 dated 25.05.2008 which fact will be verified by the court below before releasing the petitioner on bail. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)