IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17023 of 2010 MADHULATA KIRAN @ MEERA DEVI WIFE OF SRI NARESH MEHTA, R/O VILLAGE- JHITKIYAHI, P.S.- PIPRA, DISTRICT- SUPAUL ……...Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ………….Opposite Party ----------- 2 17/05/2010 Heard Mr. Pramod Mishra learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered under Sections 302, 201, 120B of the Indian Penal Code. According to the allegation, the informant’s daughter Chuni Devi was married two years earlier with Vinod Rai. The informant’s son-in-law was having illicit relationship with the petitioner which was being protested by the informant’s daughter. When she died then it was suspected that she might have been killed by the petitioner and others. Submission is that the petitioner is a lady and has a child in her lap. Other named accused persons, namely, Prakash Mehta and Binod Mehta have been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 9.2.2010 and 9.3.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3087 and 6856 of 2010 respectively. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to be released 2 on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. I/concerned Court, Supaul in Sessions Trial No. 105 of 2010 arising out of Pipra P.S. Case No. 69 of 2009 subject to following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. . avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)