IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14515 of 2009 1. AKHILESH KLUMAR MEHTA S/O SRI NAURANGI MAHTO RESIDENT OF ISMAILPUR, P.O. NISHARPURA, VIA- PUNPUN, P.S. PHULWARISHARIF, DISTT- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY, BOARD OF REVENUE BIHAR, PATNA 2. COMMISSIONER, PATNA DIVISION, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE PATNA 4. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY, BOARD OF REVENUE DEPARTMENT RANCHI 5. THE COMMISSIONER, CHHOTANAGPUR DIVISION STATE OF JHARKHAND 6. THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN / SECRETARY PATNA ----------- 2. 16.11.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State as also the learned Counsel for the State Advisory Committee. Learned Counsel fairly acknowledges that the petitioner is not a state cadre employee but a regional cadre employee. The matter relates to a claim for allocation of cadre to Bihar from Jharkhand consequent to the reorganization of the State. It is only the State Cadre level employees who are amenable to such consideration. In reply to the last submission of the petitioner learned Counsel for the State Advisory Committee fairly submits that any request for mutual transfer is an entirely different issue to be considered according to the guidelines. This Court finds no error calling for interference in this writ application. It is dismissed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)