^>^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITtON N0. 2429 OF 2005 PETmONER Nilu Saioman, Slo Late Suresh Chandr; Satoman, aged about 44 years, R'! Kelawadi, Distt. Durg (CG). Versus it.ta^'UNUtN 1; Transport Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). 2. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). 3. Shahji Joseph, S/o not known, Bus Operator, Bus Stand, Raipur (CG). ?etilion under Artide 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) igle Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Vivek Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Amrito Das, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri Saurabh Sharma, counsei for the respondent No.3. ORDER (ORAD (Passed on this 18th day of August, 2009) Go', Learned counsel for the petitioner, on insfructions, submits that wlth the passage of Sime, this petition has become infructuous, to whlch learned counsel appearing for the respondents havsno objection. 2. ' . it is ordered, as prayed for. 3. Accordingiy, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- .;,.. SatisbK.Agnibotn Judge