^a^ INTHEHlGHCOURrQFCHH^^^^^^^^ Wnt Petition NQ. 2238 of 2002 Petitioner 2. 3. M. P. State JRoad 'Iransport Corporation, Through its Divisional Maaager, M.P.S.R.T.C. BUaspur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through fhe Secretar}7, Traasport, D. K. Bhavaa, Secretariat, Raipur(C.G.) The Regional Traasport Aufhority, Bilaspiir (Chhattisgarh) The Secretary, Regional Traasport Aufliorily cum R.T.0. (Regional Traxisport Ofi&cer), Bilaspur. 4, Shri Anfl Duggal, Bus Opeiutor, R/o, Anibikapur (C.G.) WKrrPETITONUNDERARriCLE_22^&_^^^ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB: Hon?ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri Yogesh Paiidey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashaak 'l'Iiakur, Paael Lawyer fbr flie respoiidents No, 1 to 3, None for fhe respondent No.4. 2. OR DER (Passed on fhis 10th Day ofNovember, 2008) The petitioner impugns the order dated 23.9.2002 (Annexure P/3), whereby adniittedly the permit was gratited to fhe respondent No.4 to run the vehicle bearing C,Q. 15-ZA-0215 froxn Maaendragarh to Nagpur via Bishrampur, Soorajpur, Sruiagar, Baikunflipur aad back fbr a penod of one xxioufh fram 26.9.2002 to 30.10.2002. This permit period has already conie to aa end, Thus nothing reniains fbr adjudication of fhe dispute as no ofher issue is iavolved. Leaiiied counsel appearmg fbr the petitioner adiaits tfaat wifh ftie passage of time ttus petition has become mfructuous. Thus, the petition is dismissed as haviag become iafiructuous. Consequenfly, M(W)P No. 1297/2002 is also dismissed. Thaimr Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge