IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 20621 of 2009 M/s Tanvi Cooperative Labour & Construction Society .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Hemant Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Patter, Sr. DAG, Haryana, for the State. Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 4. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. As per the reply, the claim in the writ petition is for payment of bills on completion of work done by the petitioner. In the reply, it is stated that the petitioner had left the work in between, which fact is disputed by the counsel for the petitioner. Since the disputed question of facts is involved, it would be appropriate to relegate the petitioner to the remedy of filing the civil suit. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file a civil suit for the same relief. March 30, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE