IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 11th day of October, 2011 1st Bail Application No.845 of 2011 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Yogendra S/o Baleshwar, R/o Village Lakhnauta, Police Station-Jhabrera, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar. ………Applicant Versus tate of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party S Arising out of Case Crime No. 8 of 2011, Under Section 302 I.P.C., olice Station- Satpuli, District –Pauri Garhwal. P Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate, and Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. S.S.Adhikari, A.G.A., present for the State. Heard. Applicant Yogendra, who is in jail in connection with Crime No. 8 of 2011, relating to offence punishable Under Section 302 I.P.C., Police Station- Satpuli, District Pauri Garhwal, has sought his release on bail. The First Information Report is delayed one. It is a case of circumstantial evidence. Copy of the Post Mortem Report shows that cause of death could not be ascertained. Learned 2 counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant has been named only on suspicion. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion, as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Yogendra, be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Lansdowne. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 11.10.2011 JM