-\ £?;;;"-. ^R ..^ .^^ .T IN THE HI6H COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.6.) ^^, WRIT PETCTION (C) NO/ /2011 PETITCONER Udaya Sahakari 6rih Nirman Sanstha Maryadit, Registration No.75/81-82, registered under the provisions of c.6.5tate Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, Through - The President, Tatibandh, Tahsil & Eiistt. Raipur-(C.6.) RESPON&ENTS VERSUS : l." A/l%r< J^y^ '7 /"'' WA^' ^^'/ ^^y 9V' State of Chhattisgarh, Through : bepartment of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.6.). Collector, Raipur-(C.6.) 3". Tahsildar, Raipur-(C.£.) 4.'"" Director, Town and Country Planning,' Raipur-(C.6.) 5. Municipal Corporation, Raipur, Through - The Commissioner, Raipur-(C.6.) 6. '"Singhania Buildcon Pvt.Ltd., Through - birector-Mr.Subodh Singhania, Aged about 40 years, S/o Shri Shyamlal Singhania, Registered office at Amanaka, G.E.Road, Tahsil & bistt. Raipur-(C.G.) WRIT PETTTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF__THE CONSTCTUTtON OF IN&IA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAAAUS. ORDER OR DIRECTIONS A6AINST THE RESPONDENTS. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS cffi HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 7633 OF 2011 Udava Sahakari Grih Nirman Sanstha Ma",'adit. Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Othere (Wht Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of 'ndia) Sinale Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satjsh K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Abhishek Sinha, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Murthy, Dy. Advocate General for the State. ORDER (Passed on this 14 day of December, 2011) 1. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petittoner has made an application to the Tahsildar, Raipur, for demareation ofthe land in dispute on 06.02.2009 (Annexure P-6). Thereafter, he made a representation to the Collector also on 28.08.2009 (Annexure P-7). Till date, no action has been taken on the application of the petitioner, though he has a right to seek demareation of the land in accordance with law. Shri Murthy, learned Dy. Advocate General appearing for the State respondents submite that the pending application shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, after intimating to other concerned parties, within a period of four weeks from the date oi receipt of copy of this order. 3. In view of foreaoina, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submite that nothina survives for adiudication in this matter. 4. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merit, the writ petition - stands disposed of. No order asto costs. ___ _ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge AS?10iC