\ g Petitioners WGH €SUR1' §F €HHAW§S$ARH BILASWJR Wm Pemion {S} No. 345i) of 2003 ’H Bakam Sam. Sic. Shri Manbadh Sahu. aged about 54 years; Assi$tant Teacher Government Primary $chaoL JhaEmaia, 8lcck Pusaur, Dé$trict Raigarh (CG). Shivcharan Pabia. Sic. Shri Dhobai Ram Podia, aged about 61 yearsi Assistant Teacher, Gevamment Primary School, Thengapaki, Black Pusaur, District Raigarh (CG). Janmeiai abgut 56 Gupta years" Assistant 8/0 Shri Teaéher‘ A‘un Gupta Gévermt'em aqed Primary Schooi, Badmaf; Biock Pusaur, Diatrict Raigarh (CG). Bhagirathi Panda. Slo. Shri Ka‘ém Panda, aged abeu‘r 61. years. Assistant Teacher; Gave...n. Middie SshOGE, E'ga Bkock Pusaur, District Raigarh (CG) Phootcdhand Sidar, Sic, Shri Rodha Ram Sédar, aged abouk 56 yearsk Aasistant Teacher, Government Primary Scham, EktaL Béock Pusaw; D Parmeshwar Prasad Mishra, Sic. Shri Bah'am Mishra) aged about 61 years, Assistant Teacher, Governent Middm Schoot, Jhaimala, Biock PuSaur, District Raigar‘n (CG) Goverdhan Gupta, Sic, Shri Damrudhar Gupta, aged abeut 58 years, Asséstant .eac-hea Gavamment Midd1e Schoai, Nemagar, Stack Pusaur, District Raigarh (CG). Respondents ‘ra‘zrist Raigam (CG). Versus State cf Chhattisgarh through $ecretary. Schooi Education Department, DKS. Bhawan; Raipur (c3). The Secretary, Generai_ Administraticn Departmené) QKS. Bhawam Rapur (CG). District Educaticn Officer, Raigarh: District 3). Raigarh (CG). 4) M) v ., wesent; Bmck Education Officer, Pusaur. District Raigarh (CG). (Writ Petmon under Article 2261‘227 of the Constituticn of indie) SB: Hon’bie iv‘lr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. ccunee: fer the petiticrrere. Shri MRS ahatia, Gcvt. Advocate forthe State. Shré BL. Dembra, h 39 ORH. OR%ER (Passeg gn 4‘“ day 9f Juiy, 2:308) Wm": consent of bo’th the parties. the matter es heam finakiy. 1) Learned ccunsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are entitied 'io secorid Kramonnati as per circular dated 244-3306 read with 1?-3—1 999/1 §~ 4-1 999 (Annexure W2) aiier compietion of 24 years 0f service. Learned counsei further submits that the issue invoived in the present peiiiicn has aireaciy been considered and decided by this Court in ihe matter of RS. Verma Vs. $iaie of Chhattisgarh and others WV.P.N0.2805I2QG2) by iudgment and order dated 293-2006. Learned counsei further submits that the petitioners may be granted iiberty to make a representatien to ' consider the case of the petitioners in the tight or” the iudgment passed by the Hon’bie Supreme Ceurt in the matter of state of Tripura and others Vs. K.K. Roy (2664 SCW/t) and the order passed in R5. Verma (supra), to which teamed counset appearing tor the respondents/State has no objection. ’ 2‘; Accordtngiy, iiberty sought for by the petitioners are granted to make a representation before the concerned authorities. 3) in View oi the above, the petition is disposed of with the aforesaid iibertyr Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotn Raiu Judge if“glc ’ mi !a“t