Civil Writ Petition No. 13356 of 2010 (O&M) 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Writ Petition No. 13356 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 8.9.2010 Gian Chand …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents. Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the applicants. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Civil Misc. No. 12051 of 2010 This is an application for impleading the applicants as respondentsNo.9 to 11. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection, in case the application is allowed . Civil Misc. Application is allowed. The applicants be impleaded as respondents No.9 to 11 in the array of respondents. Civil Writ Petition No. 13356 of 2010 The present writ petition has been filed with a prayer that the subsequent enquiry, ordered by the respondents, is bad in the eyes of law as in the earlier enquiry, the petitioner was exonerated of the allegations. Civil Writ Petition No. 13356 of 2010 (O&M) 2 Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, appearing for the respondents, submits that the department has opted not to hold the enquiry qua the allegations, of which the petitioner was already absolved. Respondent No.2-Director, Rural Development and Panchayats, Punjab, has filed a short reply on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 and 6 to 8 and in para No.4 whereof, it has been averred as under:- “...4. That the new complaint made before the answering respondent No.2 has been directed to be enquired by respondent No.7 i.e. Divisional Deputy Director, Panchayats, Jalandhar, vide order dated 20.8.2010, who will confine his enquiry only to the new allegations levelled in the complaint. Respondent No.8 has also been directed to send the complaint to respondent No.7 because the respondent No.7 is already conducting the enquiry on the similar complaint”. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case the respondents stick to the averments made in para No.4. In view of the stand taken, as aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge September 8, 2010 “DK”