IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Cr.Misc. NO. M 31880 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION 30.3.2009 Rajesh Kumar ......PETITIONER VERSUS State of Haryana ......RESPONDENTS PRESENT: Mr. RK Malik, Advocate Mr. SS Goripuria, DAG, Hry M.M.S.BEDI,J. Almost all the material witnesses seem to have been examined. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the right of the petitioner for liberty is being jeopardized on account of the delay, which is being caused by the witnesses by not appearing in the court. The next date of hearing before the trial court is stated to be 8.4.2009. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the stage of the trial but in view of the prima facie specific allegations against the petitioner of having inflicted injuries on the head of deceased Sham Lal, I do not deem it appropriate to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. However, the trial court will expeditiously decide the trial by giving short dates. March 30 ,2009 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE