1 wp-9492.11.sxw lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9492 OF 2011 Madhukar Bapu Patil : Petitioner versus Shankar Bapu Patil & ors. : Respondents. Mr. Abhijeet A Desai for the Petitioner. CORAM : R M SAVANT, J. DATE : 14th December 2011 P.C. 1 The above Petition takes exception to the order dated 18/07/2011 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ichalkaranji, by which order the Execution Petition filed by the Petitioner above named in Regular Darkhast No.79 of 2010 has been dismissed on the ground that it is pre­ mature. 2 There is a decree passed in a Regular Civil Suit No.250 of 2005 filed by the Petitioner to the following effect :­ “R.C.S.No.250/2005 is also partly decreed to the extent of Grampanchayat property No.306 (C.S.No.2860 to 2863) in following terms : The mutation effected by the city survey officer and T.I.L.R. In respect of those properties in the name of Shankar is declared as null and void. They are directed to take steps for mutating the name of Madhukar on the strength of his sale deed. Suit for partition in respect of Grampanchayat property No.307 (C.S.No.2859) is dismissed” 2 wp-9492.11.sxw Pursuant to the said decree, it appears that the Judgment Debtor Nos.2 and 3, who are the concerned officers of the revenue department have taken steps to execute the decree in question inasmuch as the notices have been issued to the decree holder as well as Judgment Debtor No.1 i.e. the Respondent herein. The cause for filing the present Petition is the apprehension expressed by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that execution of the decree is being unnecessarily delayed on account of the some objection raised by the Judgment Debtor No.1. The decree in clear terms directs the Judgment Debtor Nos.2 and 3 to execute the decree by mutating the name of Madhukar i.e. the Petitioner on the basis of his sale deed. Since the said officers have already commenced the process of mutating the name of the Petitioner in the revenue record, it is expected of them that the said process would be completed expeditiously so that the fruits of the decree become available to the Petitioner who is the decree holder. Therefore without interfering with the impugned order, with the observations as aforesaid, the above Writ Petition is disposed of. [R.M.SAVANT, J]