IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13905 of 2009 RAMESH PODDAR,s/o late Greez Poddar,resident of village-Karua,P.S.-Chakmehsi,Dist.- Samastipur. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Navita Devi,D/o Vishwanath Poddar, resident of village-Muraul,Tola- Jahangirpur,P.S.-Sakra,District- Muzaffarpur. ----------- 02/ 28-04-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the complainant divorced her first husband and married the petitioner, who is widower father of three children, which was known to the complainant but nursing of the minor children is necessary. For that there is need of a wife but it is beyond imagination that any demand can be made from the girl accepting the need of the petitioner. Complainant is more greedy. She divorced her first husband after taking Rs.44,000. Annexures-2 and 3 are there to corroborate the same; even he is apprehending his arrest, which in no case can be justified. I agree with the same. Accordingly, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case No.1510/2008(Trial No.2661/2008), the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.K.Singh, Sub- 2 Divisional Judicial Magistrate(East), Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )