IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2009 / 2ND POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 36995 of 2009(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. NEETHU KRISHNA (MINOR), AGED 17 YEARS, REP. BY GUARDIAN (FATHER) B.KRISHNANKUTTY, KUZHIMANNIL PUTHENVEEDU, MALLASSERY POST-689 646, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 2. AISWARYA KISHORE (MINOR), AGED 17 YEARS, REP. BY GUARDIAN (FATHER) KISHORE, THUNDIYIL HOUSE, VALLIKODE KOTTAYAM POST-689 656, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.O.RAMACHANDRAN NAMBIAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR(EDUCATION), OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR-EDUCATION, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 3. DISTRICT MATHEMATICS ASSOCIATION, REP. BY REVENUE DISTRICT SECRETARY, NETHAJI HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PRAMADOM, MALLASSERY POST-689 646, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.36995 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2009 JUDGMENT Though the petitioners complain about the appellate decision in relation to evaluation in a competition, the fact of the matter remains that three judges had awarded the petitioners' group, marks which is lower than the group which secured the first place and the difference in the marks does not generate confidence to hold that the petitioners have, in any manner, been deprived of opportunity to be extended the benefit of the visitorial jurisdiction of this Court. The writ petition fails. The same is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.23/12.