C.R.R. No.1384 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.R. No.1384 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision 19.01.2011 Onkar Singh …Petitioner Versus Dwarka Nath Bansal and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI -.- Present: Mr. A.D.S. Jattana, Advocate for the petitioner. *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed against the judgment and order dated 04.12.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bathinda allowing the revision petition of respondent No.1 and quashing the summoning order passed against him. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that respondent No.1 was a part of the conspiracy since he also held out the promise to the petitioner that motor-cycle is to be given to the petitioner free of cost. Learned revisional court has however noticed that in the written C.R.R. No.1384 of 2010 (O&M) -2- statement petitioner had not taken the stand of cheating or criminal conspiracy against respondent No.1. He further noticed that documents placed on file were not blank and bear the signature of the petitioner. Learned revisional court further held that respondent No.1 is a Dealer and is entitled for the price either by the petitioner or the United Group. Learned revisional court thus held that no charge of conspiracy could be made out against respondent No.1. In the circumstances, it cannot be said that the conclusion drawn by the learned revisional court is so palpably perverse or erroneous so as to justify interference in the revisional jurisdiction of this Court. Consequently, the revision petition is dismissed. ( AJAY TEWARI ) January 19, 2011 JUDGE ashish