IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 5094 of 2011. Date of Decision : July 5, 2011 Sanjeev Kumar … Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others … Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. J. S. Bagga, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R. K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the respondents No. 1 to 4. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexures P-8 and P-9, orders of transfer. The petitioner prays that he may be given an opportunity to make an appropriate representation before the third respondent detailing his grievances. The writ petition is hence disposed of making it clear that in the event of the petitioner filing a representation before the third respondent within two weeks from today, the same will be duly considered by the third respondent and appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law will be passed within ten days. As and when the petitioner is relieved, he may not 2 be compelled to join the transferred station and it will be open for him to avail the leave of kind due till orders, as above, are passed. 2. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s) if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. July 5, 2011 (PK/hl)