1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.12.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P.(MD).No.15936 of 2011 M.Mani ... Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Chekkanoorani Police Station, Madurai. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondents to give police protection to the petitioner's life and his lands in Survey No.166/1D3 and the same was situated at Chekkanoorani, A.Kokkulam Village, Thirumangalam Taluk and Madurai District, based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 23.11.2011. For Petitioner : Mr.H.Velavadhas For Respondents: Mr.P.Kannithevan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to give police protection to the petitioner's life and his lands in Survey No.166/1D3 and the same was situated at Chekkanoorani, A.Kokkulam Village, Thirumangalam Taluk and Madurai District, based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 23.11.2011. 2. Heard Mr.H.Velavadhas, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.P.Kannithevan, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side)appearing on behalf of the respondents. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner preferred a complaint before the respondents stating that the petitioner is the owner of the property situated in Survey No.166/1D3 at Chekkanoorani, A.Kokkulam Village, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District. In respect of the said property a gift deed was executed in favour of the petitioner on 06.05.1999. From that date onwards, the petitioner had been enjoying the said property. In the said property, the petitioner has sold away 3.5 cents to one K.Kannusamy and he has also been enjoying the property without any disturbance. Now the petitioner is trying to sell the remaining 3.5 cents in the said property. But one Sekar, who is the elder brother of the petitioner and his daughter by name Sivasakthi threatened the petitioner and caused disturbance to survey the property. Hence, suitable police protection may be given to the petitioner's life and his https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 lands in the above said survey number. Since no action has been taken on the complaint of the petitioner, he has come forward with the present petition seeking direction to the respondents police to give police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and his lands. 4. The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit in his argument that the respondents did not receive any representation from the petitioner. He would further submit that if the petitioner gives any representation, they would give police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and his family members. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (criminal side), the petitioner is directed to be given a fresh representation to the respondents. On such receipt of the representation from the petitioner, the second respondent police is directed to give police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and his family members. 6. With the above said direction, this criminal original petition is ordered accordingly to that extent. sd/- Assistant Registrar (C.O) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai. 2. The Inspector of Police, Chekkanoorani Police Station, Madurai. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai. Crl.O.P.(MD).No.15936 of 2011 14.12.2011 vsm RJ/21.12.11 2p/4c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/