IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3384 of 2010 SHYAM SUNDER RAI Versus THE V.C. T.M., BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY & ORS. ----------- 5. 24.2.2011. Heard Mrs. Pravina Kumari (Rai), learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Anil Singh, learned counsel representing the opposite parties. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the University to make payment of the entire admissible amount found payable to the petitioner. It was further directed that if any of the claims is not found admissible by the University, the same should be rejected by a reasoned order. In compliance of the order, a show cause has been filed on behalf of the University enclosing the copy of the order dated 25.11.2010 passed by the Vice Chancellor respondent University detailing the amounts that were found admissible for payment to the petitioner. The claim for payment of arrears of salary has, however, been rejected by speaking order. Learned counsel for the petitioner disputes not only the order in so far as it relates to the rejection of the claim arrears of 2 salary but also the quantum as regarding the other dues. As the order of this Court has been substantially complied by the Vice Chancellor, the present contempt application is disposed of by reserving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the Vice Chancellor dated 25.11.2010 by filing an appropriate application before the appropriate forum. Learned counsel for the petitioner, further makes a prayer for interest. It may be noted that as no such relief was granted to the petitioner in the writ petition, no such prayer can be entertained at this stage and the same is rejected. An interlocutory application has been filed seeking modification of the order dated 8.11.2010. As the order of this Court stands complied, no order needs to be passed on the interlocutory application and the same also stands disposed of. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J) 3