1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR . WRIT PETITION NO.1005 OF 1999. SMT.SATYABHAMABAI W/O PURUSHOTTAM BAJORIA THRO. ATTORNEY BHAGWANDAS S/O P. BAJORIA VS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRTA AND ANOTHER ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri S. V. Akolkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. Tajwar Khan Advocate (Panel A) for Respondent no.1. Shri D. M. Kale, Advocate for Respondent no.2 (Absent). CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : 8th MARCH, 2010. Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned M/s Tajwar Khan 'A' panel Counsel for the State. Perused the record annexed to the petition. In the midst of hearing Learned Advocate Mr. S. V. Akolkar acceds to the position that the modalities prescribed u/s 127 of MRTP Act 1965 are available to the petitioner, and he therefore, states that he does not press the petition. Even otherwise the petition does not 2 dese3rve any indulgence. Rule is discharged. No costs. Judge Judge //mule//