IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No: 9435 of 2001 Between: G.Somasekhara Rao, S/o G.Narayana Rao, Old NMaredpally Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Deputy Registrar of Co-o[perative Societies, City Circle, Hyderabad. 2 The Managing Director, The Prudential Co-op. Urban Bank Limited Secunderabad. 3 The Co-operative Tribunal, M.J.Road, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropratie Writ, order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent NO.1 in issuing the Notice of Sale of Immoveable property vide E.P.No.171/96A, in respect of L.F.O.D.A/c NO. 14094 as illegal, arbiotrary contrary and in disobedience to the orders of this Hon'ble Court and to consequently set aside the same Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.HARINATH GUPTA Counsel for the Respondent : DR.P.B.VIJAY KUMAR FOR R The Court made the following : ORDER: Sri R.V.S.N.Mohan Rao, Advocate, appearing on behalf of Sri P.Harinath Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J. 7th November 2008 CVRK