:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8713 OF 2006 Kiran Kumar Nandlal Tontai ...Petitioner Versus Nisha @ Richa Kirankumar Tontai ....Respondent Laxman Kenal i/by. A.R. Pande Adv. for the petitioners. Mr.Vivek Kantawala iby. Vivek Kantawala & Co. Adv. for the respondents. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 23rd January, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. The consent terms signed by parties and their advocates are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. The consent terms record the agreement :2: :2: :2: between the parties. The amount is to be paid in full and final settlement of all claims. The jewellery items are also to be returned as per the list annexed to the consent terms which also is approved. All claims are given up. In such circumstances and when all allegations against each other are also withdrawn, the parties are agreeable to have their marriage dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent. The Family court to proceed accordingly and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. 2. Insofar as, the pending Criminal Case is concerned the learned Metropolitan Magistrate is requested to take cognisance of these consent terms and pass appropriate orders in the criminal case in accordance with law. 3. The terms have been signed by the parties after fully understanding the implications. They have signed the same willingly and without any force and pressure. They confirm the statements in the terms, so also, the correctness of the list annexed thereto. Writ Petition disposed off in terms of the consent terms. No order :3: :3: :3: as to costs. 4. The Family Court to allow the pending petition to be converted into a petition for dissolution of the marriage by a decree of divorce by mutual consent. sd/- ********