AB 3355/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P K MUSAHARY Heard Mr. S.Barthakur, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr.B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl.Public Prosecutor, Assam who has produced the connected case diary. On reading the case diary it appears that both the informant-victim girl and t he accused-petitioner have been working as LIC Agents. In the Ejahar the informa nt victim girl did not make any allegation that the accused-petitioner committe d rape on her by force, rather it appears that she was a consenting party being a major girl. The informant has not furnished the detailed particulars of giving false promise and having sex with her which led to her pregnancy and abortion e tc.whereas the case has been registered u/s 376/493/315/417 IPC. Considering the nature of allegation in the FIR, I find no ingredient of offence u/s 376 IPC, although, there may be some ingredients u/s 315/417 IPC. The accus ed petitioner, as stated in the petition has got married recently. In view of the above, it is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitio ner, Sri Khogen Saikia, in connection with the aforesaid Bokakhat P.S.Case No.2 7/2011, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- wit h one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting autho rity and conditions u/s 438 (2) Cr.P.C .The accused petitioner shall appear in p erson before the I.O. concerned for interrogation and recording his statements as and when required under the law. With the aforesaid directions bail application stands disposed of.