1 S.B. Criminal Misc. III Bail Application No.3310/2007 Date : 19.07.2007 HON'BLE MR.SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. S.S. Shaktawat for the applicant. Mr. O.P. Rathi, Public Prosecutor. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that co-accused Dhanna Ram was granted bail by this Court in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Petition No.1715/2007 vide order dated 05.07.2007. According to learned counsel, Dhanna Ram was found in the jeep from where contraband material was recovered. It has been submitted that as far as accused applicant is concerned, he was not found in the jeep from where it is alleged that the contraband material was recovered. He submits that case of applicant is on better footing, therefore, he should be considered for bail. Learned counsel has placed before me certified copy of the order passed by this Court in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Petition No.1715/2007 (Dhanna Ram Vs. State of Raj.). 2 On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. I have considered the submissions made before me. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the present case and further that accused Dhanna Ram, who was found in the vehicle, has already been granted bail, therefore, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that applicant Vishna Ram s/o Kana Ram shall be released on bail in FIR No.85/2006 P.S. Siwana, District Barmer, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. vij