CR 183 of 2008 18.4.2009 Present: Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Addl. A.G. for the petitioner. Shri J.L. Bhardwaj, Advocate,for the respondent. The State is aggrieved by the order passed in an appeal by the learned District Judge, Chamba against the order passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Dalhousie in an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure preferred by the respondent-plaintiff. The learned trial Court on appraisal of the material on record issued an injunction restraining the petitioner herein from interfering in the possession of the plaintiff-respondent over the suit land. The State appealed to the learned District Judge, Chamba who vide its order dated 22nd July, 2008 dismissed the appeal preferred by the State affirming the order passed by the trial Court. The learned Additional Advocate General has made submissions on the legality of the order and urged that respondent herein cannot claim ownership of the land and therefore, there is no question of granting any interim order against the State. This aspect is to be considered on the settled issues and evidence led in the suit. Suffice it to say that the two Courts having concurrently found in favour of the respondent, there is no reason to interfere with the impugned order at this stage. This petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. April 18, 2009 (Dev Darshan Sud), (ms) Judge.