CWP(T) No. 9097/2008 23.05.2011 Present: Mr. Surender Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents. Petitioner’s request for appointment on compassionate basis stands turned down by the respondents in terms of decision conveyed vide letter dated 25.2.2002 (Annexure A-14). The rejection is only on the ground that petitioner’s elder brother is employed with Indian Army. 2. It is the petitioner’s grievance that the fact that the said elder brother was living separately has not been considered by the respondents. Petitioner has placed on record material before this Court to the said effect also. It is also the petitioner’s grievance that the authorities have not taken into account the policy framed by the respondents as applicable to the dependants. 3. Evidently, the authorities have not considered the petitioner’s case in totality. Simply because some member of the family is employed in Government service, that fact by itself is not a ground for rejection under the policy. Annexure A-14 stands quashed. Consequently, in view of the certain disputed issues which stand raised in this present petition, the interest of justice would be met if a direction be issued to respondent No.1 to consider the petitioner’s case afresh in the light of the material placed by him before this Court, after taking into account the admissibility of the petitioner’s claim in terms of the policy framed by them. Needful be positively done within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. Liberty granted to the petitioner to place additional material before the authorities. 4. With the aforesaid observations, present petition stands disposed of. Copy dasti. May 23, 2011 ( Sanjay Karol ), (rana) Judge.