THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P. No. 1433 of 2010 Dated. 08–10-2010 Between: Peteti Rama Murthy …Petitioner Vs. Gopula Venkata Rao and others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P.No.1433 of 2010 ORAL ORDER: This is a revision under Article 227 of the Constitution, by the 1st respondent in E.O.P.No.12 of 2006. The 1st respondent herein filed the election petition challenging the election of the revision petitioner as Sarpanch, Guntupalli village, Ballikurava Mandal, Prakasam District and seeking the consequential relief of declaring him as elected as Sarpanch after invalidating the election of the revision petitioner. In the election petition after closure of the evidence, the revision petitioner filed I.A.No. 1528 of 2009 to reopen his evidence so as to enable him to recall R.Ws. 1 and 4 to confront these witnesses with an endorsement by R.W.4 who acted as the Stage-I Election Officer on the telegram issued by the High Court on 20-06-2006 at 11-00 A.M. and mark the same on behalf of R.W.1 and pass further orders. He filed I.A.No. 1529 of 2009 under Order XVIII Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to recall R.Ws. 1 and 4. For detailed reasons recorded in I.A.No. 1529 of 2009 on 20-02-2010, the Court below rejected the application to recall R.Ws. 1 and 4 for the purpose of confronting them with the endorsement alleged to have been made by R.W.4 on a telegram. Today C.R.P.No. 1444 of 2010, directed against the order dated 20-02-2010 in I.A.No. 1529 of 2009 has been rejected by this Court. For reasons alike, this revision directed against the order dated 20-02-2010 rejecting I.A.No. 1528 of 2009 is also liable to be dismissed and is accordingly rejected at the stage of admission. There shall however be no order as to costs. __________________________ JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM Dated: 08-10-2010 Pvks/*