C ^ 3.^ ^. IN_THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.f S.) N0. / 2007 PETITIONERS '"s- ^<y ^ss^ .•--y^ .<1<'?" .' .*•* Y ,fS ^ ^"'.^ rfr <^..A ^ 1) Dilip Kumar Chandravanshi S/o. Gajadhar Ram Chandravanshi, 39 years Assistant Teacher, Government Pre Middle School, Sonpuri, Block Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) 2) Sanjay Kumar Dubey S/o- Ram Chand Dubey, Assistant Teacher Govemment Girls Higher Secondary School Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) ,"4^ RamnathYogi, <*-c1 <;?' ^^ .^ S/o. Bhakunath Yogi, Assistant Teacher Govemment Girls Priinary School, Pipariya Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1) t- 2) 3) f State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary School Education Department Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) Director, F'ublic Instructions Raipur Distt Raipur (C.G.) The Deputy Director, Public Instructions Durg Division Distt Durg (C.G.) Head Master Govemment Pre Middle School Sonpuri Block Kawardha Distt Kabirdham (C.G.) 5) Principal .— <r Govemment Girls Higher Secondary School Kawardha Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) Head Master Govemment Girls Primary School Pipariya Block Kawardha Distt Kabirdham (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 .^_^^rti£ulars_D£the_Pftitinnpr ?- i' t, /3% HIW COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT KELASWR W. P.fSJ No. 96S of 2007 PetitK>ner : Versus t>itq} Kunwr Ownttrovanshi and olfiers State of Oihattisgarh and o1t»ers SB: Honl>teMr. Justice Satish K. ^^mhotri. J Present: Mr. Prafull Bhfrat, Advocate for th®petitionen. Mr. Sertish 6upta, Depu'ty 6ovemm»)tAdwarte fer State/reqwnctents. ..s ORDER (Rassed on thte 20ttl Day of FebnKuy. 2007) 1. Lecmed coimsel appearing for Ihe petitiatwrs aAmits that the question of law involved «t-this petition is goverrad by •rt'NB Circutar dated 20-1-1987. The High Court' of Madhya PradeA in Irdnweer Singh Tonwu* vs. State of AU>. and o-thers^ has considentd 1+ie isaie and dispositd of -the said mattw in folkwiing twws:- PareZ "„.„....„....„..„ Ih wsw of 1his submission adiwnced by Counsel for pcrties, •this petH-ion is disposed of by givmg foUowmg directions. The respondent No. 1 shall conader petitioner's rqiresentnttons referred to above and dispose of tte soune at en early date, preferably withm a period of 3 mon'ths from Ihe dort-e of commimkation of this order in accordcnce wilft low, l^>mg in mind -the circuktrs ^- 'y 'issued by State Sovt. as al«Ae direefions gwen by •the Tribunal in similar motters." 2. Leomed counsel cppearing for the parties would jointly submit and admit that -this case, bemg simikir in nalure, is squarety covered by -rtte decision of Itie MadBiya Prodesh Hi9h Court- in the cose of Ihdrawser Smgh Tomar (&ipra). 3. Jn view of aforestated reaaons, this petition is dispoad of bi the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotr1 Judge 1 2004(2) MPMT.XNOC) ^>b »