Wm WW 91%fg/Qw} 200 ( ‘ HON—APPLICANT§ p4 ”E: HéN—TLE SHRI §IiiREW§RA MYSHRA, J D( m }C 1') hief Engineer, Public Works Department, a u’mw rw 0G. xecutive Engineer, Public Works riparhans‘nf ’ Raigg‘rh Deparment 0f Public Wcrks, AS awan, Mantralaya, Raipur, CG. UG . ; (3) Distt v WW“, m; .4“ “W11, u‘garh, Chhat‘u‘sgaru 1 “-8-209’? Shri Saniay Kumar Agrawal, Advocate for the applicant. The applicant has filed this appiication for mca‘l‘n’ng of the order dated 4-7—2007 passed by t1 C1 m Z} [\‘ lis Coun in Arb.A. No. 15/2006 whereby. ' the appiication was dismissed for wwt of prosecution. Leained counsel for foe appiicant submits that 011 4-7-2007, on an urgent c311 from his home, he had to proceed to his home anti, therefore, he could not attend the case when the same was caEed and thus absence is honaflde and the same deserves to he condoned. Taking into consideration the reasons assigned by the applicant, which is supported by the affidavit of the counsel [rah V \L Mfs Shyatiilal Agrawal, Engineers and Builders; “Anand, Shanon Road, Raigarh, idiatt‘isgarh, through its attorney Shrl Land Agrawal XI-HC~22 appearing for th€ applicam payment of COSt of Rs. 200 Committuea‘Tim order dated Lb/ ZUU’? is restored to its or a ths application is ajiowed subject to /'— payable ”to the High Court LEgai Aid 4-7—2007 1S rccalied and the Arb. A. No. gmai number. Sd/— Dhifendra Mishra Judge w $mvww 0v? Hm'bM Cw? clerk. (om/wamr M> 2M/r WM W7 mgr/09 J ‘ //a%€ vagvzwe W we #75, %' /§*/og’ . Sd/— H1%W