IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAlTlSGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 1026 of2004 Petitioner Ram Khilawan Sahu, Son of lam Shri Rikshi Ram Sahu, aged aboutr59 years, Resident of Village: Bodsala, Tahsil Janjgir, Distt: Janjgir ~ Champa (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary (RevenueL D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) Collector, Janjgir— District — Janjgir —- Champa (C.G.) Sub Divisional OECer, Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) ’ ‘ahsildar, District ~ Janjgir—Champa (C. G.) Versus Respondents 1. 10 Bund Kunwar Satnami (Saxpanch), aged about 62 years, wife of not known, resident of Bodsara, Distt: Janjgir — Champa (C.G.) Lakhan Lal Sahu (EX—Sarpalwh) Son of Shri Dukhuram Sahu, aged about 56 yars, resident of Bodsara, Distt Janjgn' — Champa(C.G.) Superintendent of Police, Distt: Janjgir — Champa(C.G,) Manager, Son of Girdhaxi, Caste : Khaixwar, aged about 37 veals. Dileram, Son of Chheduram, aged about 32 years. Chhatram, Son of Dayaram, aged about 52 years. 10. 11. l2. 13. 14. Nanki, Son of Bihanu ram, aged about 3'7 years. Motilal, $011 of Sudhuram, aged about 37 years. 5 Akshay, Son of Ginihan', aged about 42 years. Panchram, Son of Mangel Singh, aged about 37 years. Jagdish, Son of Mulit Ram, aged about 32 years. Dharam Lal, Son of Bihanu, aged about 37 years. Khishan, Son of Sakhan,.aged about 42 years. §. t 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Tij Ram, Son of Mulit Ram, aged about 42 years. Milan, Son of Sakhan, aged about 37 years. Pat Ram, Son of Dayaram, aged about 52 years. Jant Ram, Son of Budal, aged about 62 years, Caste : Sahu. Bhakhala, Son of Kunjram satnami, aged about 64 years. (From Sl. No. 8 to 22 are resident of 23. Th6 Bodsara, Additional Distt Janjgjr Collector, — Champa Janjgir~Champa, ~ C.G.) Distt : Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE N CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon’ble Shn‘ Satish K. Agnihotn‘ J) None for the petitioner. Shri Rajendra Agazwal, Panal Lawyer for the respondents/ State. O R D E R (Passed on this 14th Day ofAugust, 2008) The matter is callsd 1hr hearing twice. On both the occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the peiiiioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. In View of me ebove, the petition is dismissed for want of Raju prosecution. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihoui Judge F‘W