IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24113 of 2011 1. Kashi Ram son of Yamuna Ram. 2. Banaras Ram son of Yamuna Ram. Both residents of Village-Kudiyapur, Police Statino-Barhariya, District-Siwan. ..........Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar. .....Opposite Party ----------- 03 24.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The present application is confined to petitioner no. 2 as petitioner no. 1 has already been arrested. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Barhariya Police Station Case No. 201 of 2010 for the offence under sections 341, 323 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the allegation made in the First Information Report, the present petitioners along with petitioner no. 1 are supposed to have had a dispute with the informant which led to assault an injury on one Anwarul Haque. Submission of the counsel is that this is a false and frivolous case which has been made because there was a dispute over working in the firm of the informant. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the injury report has been created only with the observation of making out a case. As reading of para 21 of the case diary, which would show that even though the incident is supposed to be on 20th of November, 2010 at about 6:00 P.M. the injury report shows that Inamul Haque, the so called injured, the son and informant had already been 2 examined by the doctor at 5:40 P.M. on 28th of November, 2010 itself. Obviously this is a matter which cause doubt over the authenticity of the nature and injury etc. Be that as it may, looking at the material and the circumstances, let the petitioner no. 2, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Barhariya Police Station Case No. 201 of 2010, one of the surety will be executed by close blood relation on due identification is to their relationship, subject to conditions as laid under section 438 (2) of Criminal Procedure Code. Safik (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)