IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.20215-M of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:13.5.2011 M/s Ultra Home Care Coils (Private) Limited and others .... Petitioner Versus M/s R.K. Petro Tankers & Dealers Private Limited .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. B.B.S. Sobti, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anuj Kohli, Advocate for the respondent. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that since the petitioners have been acquitted, the present petition for quashing of complaint is rendered infructuous. However, the second prayer that the action be initiated against the respondent-complainant for backing out from the written compromise is yet to be adjudicated. Therefore, he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail of the alternative remedy in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 13.5.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE