1 69.11-ao IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 69 OF 2011 Narendra Pratap Ramjetasingh. ... Appellant. V/s. M/s.Sahakar Corporation and others. ... Respondents. S.A.Sawant for the appellant. A.Y.Sakhare, Senior Advocate with Ms.K.K.Soran for respondent No.2- Corporation. Ms.Asha Bhombwani with Ms.Kiran Bagalia for respondent No.3. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATED : 29th September 2011. P.C. : Since the challenge raised in this appeal from order is to the ad-interim order dated 15th December 2010 passed by the Judge, City Civil Court refusing to grant interim relief during the pendency of the notice of motion, this appeal can be conveniently disposed of by directing the City Civil Court to dispose of notice of motion expeditiously. 2. The City Civil Court is, therefore, directed to dispose of Notice of Motion No.3203/2010 in S.C.Suit No.2518/2010 as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within twelve weeks from today 2 69.11-ao after extending opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned. It is informed by learned counsel for the appellant that the Municipal Corporation has considered the eligibility of the appellant and held him eligible for the allotment of alternate accommodation. This aspect be considered by the trial Court while passing order on the notice of motion. 3. Interim order passed by this Court dated 19th January 2011 shall remain operative till the disposal of notice of motion 3. Appeal from order stands disposed of accordingly. In view disposal of appeal from order, pending civil application does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly. (R.M.BORDE, J.)