RFA No. 26 of 2000 18.10.2010 Present: Mr. Dheeraj Kumar, counsel for the appellant. Mr. Imran Khan, counsel for respondent No.1. None for respondent No.2. Mr. Pawan Kumar, vice Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Since notice was issued to respondent No.2, through Registered A.D. post returnable on or before 26.08.2010 and since a period of one month has elapsed, since then presumption of deemed service is available. Accordingly respondent No.2 is proceeded against ex-parte. CMP No. 465 of 2010 Heard. It appears that at pages 20 and 21 of the judgment dated 20.04.2010, in RFA No. 26 of 2000, titled Shri Om Prakash Chaudhary versus Himachal Pradesh Wakf Board and others, the provision of law has been inadvertently, owing to some typographical error, has been mentioned as Order 23, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 instead of Order 22, Rule 10 of the said Code. The mistake is required to be rectified. Ordered accordingly. The Registry shall do the needful by carrying out the requisite correction at pages 20 and 21 of the aforesaid judgment. The application stands disposed of. (V.K. Sharma) Judge 18th October, 2010 pritam