IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 29101 of 2008 Between: Mohd. Yousuf Ali, S/o. late Mohd. Ahmed Ali, R/o. H.No. 14-1-225/1, Mangalhat, Hyderabad, President of the Mustafa Roseland Cooperative Housing Society Limited, (TAB-91) Having its Regd. Office at No. 17-1-391/M/164, Khaja Bagh, Saidabad, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Cooperation and Registrar of Cooperative Societies, MJ Road, Hyderabad-I. 2 The District Collector-Election Authority, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. 3 Election Officer, Mustafa Roseland Cooperative Housing' Society Limited, O/o. the Divisional Cooperative Officer, Secunderabad Division, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in th enature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing election notification dated 17-11-2008 and going ahead with the electionprocess for the Mustafa Roseland Cooperative Housing Society Limited (TAB-91) even after coming to know about the orders passed in Review WPMP NO. 34955 of 2008 in Writ Petition in W.P.No. 9523/2007 as illegal and unconstitutional and consequently declare that the election process initiated by the authorities to Mustafa Roseland Cooperative Housing Society Limited is null and void and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.S.MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.29101 of 2008 ORDER: Heard Sri K.S.Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Government Pleader for Cooperation and with their consent the writ petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission. While several contentions are urged in the writ petition, Sri K.S.Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that it would suffice if this Court were to direct the respondents to consider and pass orders on the representation submitted by the petitioner. Learned Government Pleader for Cooperation would state that the representation submitted by the petitioner has already been considered and orders were passed thereon. If it be so, the said order shall be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ____________ 31-12-2008 cvrk