S.B. Cr. Bail Application No. 1458/2008 (Nirmla Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 16.04.2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. R.S.Chundawat for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, P.P. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and public prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and police investigation diary. It appears from the police investigation diary that the petitioner and her son jointly approached the complainant for sale of their house and ultimately agreed to sale the house to the complainant for a sum of Rs.11,71,000/- and petitioner received a sum of Rs. 6,71,000/- for which she executed a receipt duly signed by her on revenue stamp and now it appears that they had no intention to sale the house but fraudulently and dishonestly induced the complainant to part with a huge amount of Rs. 6,71,000/-. In my view, in such matter, custodial interrogation is necessary and therefore, no case for anticipatory bail is made out. The bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp