1 26.cas350.11 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 350 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 2740 OF 1993 The State of Maharashtra ....Applicant. Vs. M/s. Murlidhar Shankar Jande & Co. & ors. ....Respondents Ms. V.S. Mhaispurkar, AGP for Applicant. CORAM:- GIRISH GODBOLE, J DATED:- SEPTEMBER 12, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard Ms. Mhaispurkar, learned AGP for Applicant. None appears on behalf of the Respondents even on the first call and on the second call. The Appeal has been dismissed for non-prosecution on account of failure to serve the Respondent No. 2(a). Justification for delay which is offered in paragraph- 3 to 6 is accepted, apart from the fact that the same is not opposed. The Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). (GIRISH GODBOLE, J)