THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Writ Petition No.25958 of 2011 23rd September, 2011 Between :- P.Dasaradha Reddy and another .. Petitioners And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Writ Petition No.25958 of 2011 ORDER:- The petitioners herein, who are two in number, have filed the Writ Petition seeking Mandamus declaring the action of the District Collector, Chittoor District – respondent No.2; the Revenue Divisional Officer – respondent No.3; and the Tahasildar, Satyavedu, Chittoor District – respondent No.4 in not mutating their names in the revenue records and in not issuing Pattedar Passbooks and title deeds as arbitrary and illegal. The 1st petitioner claims that he purchased the land admeasuring Ac.2.56 cents in Sy.No.302/3 and Ac.2.44 cents in Sy.No.302/4 of P.V.Puram village, Satyavedu Mandal, in the auction held by the District Cooperative Central Bank, Satyavedu, in E.P.No.184 of 2000-01 dated 27-6-2002. The petitioner No.2 claims to have purchased the land to an extent of Ac.1.60 cents in Sy.No.302/1 and Ac.1.58 cents in Sy.No.302/2 of P.V.Puram village, Satyavedu Mandal, Chittoor District, in the auction held by the District Cooperative Central Bank, Satyavedu in E.P.No.209 of 2000-01 dated 27-6-2002. After obtaining sale certificates from the District Cooperative Central Bank, Satyavedu, they made representations dated 27-9-2003 to the Tahasildar, Satyavedu, Chittoor District – respondent No.4 for mutation of their names in the revenue records and also for issuance of Pattedar Passbooks and Title Deeds. They also made another representation to the respondents No.2 to 4 on 20-6-2011 for mutation of their names in the revenue records and also for issuance of Pattedar Passbooks and title deeds. Since their representations are not being attended to, they invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the relief stated supra. When the Writ Petition came up for admission, learned Government Pleader for Revenue (Andhra and Rayalaseema Area) take notice. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the parties. The limited grievance of the petitioners is that their representations for mutation of their names in the revenue records and for grant of Pattedar Passbooks and title deeds is not being attended to. In that view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition directing the Tahasildar, Satyavedu, Chittoor District – respondent No.4 to consider the representation dated 20-6-2011 and pass appropriate orders within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. No order as to costs. ________________________ B.Seshasayana Reddy, J 23rd September, 2011 smr