IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26669 of 2010 SURESH PASWAN, son of late Keshdhari Paswan, resident of village Raghunanthpur, P.S. Fatehpur, District Gaya Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.8.2010 Heard Mr. N.K.Agrawal, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. The prayer for bail of the petitioner in fact was allowed by an order dated 1.9.2009 in Cr.Misc.No. 25669/2009 subject to the petitioner having no criminal antecedent. It appears that the petitioner had criminal antecedent and therefore, he was not released on bail. Subsequently the petitioner had moved again this Court for bail before this Court but the same was rejected by an order dated 24.2.2010 in Cr.Misc.No. 44338/2009 with an observation that the petitioner could renew his prayer for bail after completion of 18 months of his judicial custody. Mr. Agrawal would submit that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 20.12.2008 and as such, has completed the period of 1½ years (18 months) as indicated in the order of this Court dated 24.2.2010. 2 Surendra/ Recording the aforementioned submissions, this Court would direct the petitioner, Suresh Paswan, to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.D.J., F.T.C. IV, Gaya in S.Tr.No. 4/2009 arising out of Fatehpur P.S.Case No. 146/2008, subject to the following conditions:- (i) The two bail bonds will be furnished, one by the Government servant and the other by a close family relative. (ii) The petitioner will remain present in course of trial on each and every day and his absence even for a single day would automatically entail the consequences of cancellation of his bail. (iii) The petitioner in case is now made accused in any other criminal case, that would itself lead to cancellation of his bail. Subject to the aforementioned conditions, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) 3