IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.W.P.No.1727 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:September 22, 2010 Vinod .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Surender Deswal, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.W-969 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.W.P.No.1727 of 2010 The present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. read with Section 3(1)(c) of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988, is for issuance of direction to respondents to decide the pending agriculture parole application of the petitioner. Heard. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner already moved application in this regard before respondent no.3, i.e., Superintendent of Jail, District Jail, Karnal, on 18.6.2010, Annexure P1, and however, no action has been taken on the same so far. Hence, in view of these facts and as per request, the present petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider and decide the application of the petitioner, dated 18.6.2010, Annexure P1, already stated to have been moved before respondent no.3, as per law, Rules and Instructions on the point, within two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 22.9.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge