1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.395 OF 1986 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr.S.M.Railkar for the appellant. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 06/10/2010 PC: 1. This second appeal is directed against the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the courts below in the suit filed respondent nos.1 and 2. The suit was filed for partition and separate possession and it was decreed vide judgment and order dated 30.11.1981 declaring that the plaintiffs together have got 1/4th share in the suit property whereas defendant nos.1 to 3, defendant nos.4 and 5, and defendant nos.6 and 7 have got 1/4th share each. The appeal came to be dismissed for non prosecution against respondent nos.1(A), 1(B), 7 and 8 long back. It appears that despite the orders dated 31.8.2009 and 8.9.2010 the advocate for the appellant has S 2 not taken steps for restoration of the appeal. Therefore, considering the nature of decree, the appeal itself deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution. Order accordingly. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)