IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 1476 of 2008 Between: Srinivas Reddy Tamma S/o.Koti Reddy Tamma R/o. Kotireddipet, S.B.I. Building, Pamarru, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Chairman, Registered Office at 17, Jamshedji Tata Road, Mumbai. 2 Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Regional Manager, Vijayawada L.P.G. Regional Office, I.D.A. Kondapalli, Krishna District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in rejecting the application of the petitioner for LPG Distributorship dt. 29.10.2007 as illegal and arbitrary and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.ABDUL NAJEEB KHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.THOOMSRINIVAS The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 1476 of 2008 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents in rejecting the application of the petitioner for LPG distributorship is arbitrary and illegal. This Court, while directing Rule Nisi, by order dated 29-01-2008 in W.P.M.P.No.1765 of 2008, directed the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner also along with other candidates provided, he produces X Class pass certificate at the time of interview. When the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri T.Srinivas, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, under instructions stated that subsequently, selections were finalized and the candidates were short-listed by the Corporation. Since the petitioner did not produce the X Class pass certificate, his case was not considered. In the circumstances, no further enquiry is necessary in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 04-12-2008 KLP