IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2009 / 12TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 15112 of 2009(H) --------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. ABDUL RASEED.O.P, S/O.ABDUL RAHIMAN, AGED 24 YEARS,RESIDINGA AT ONAPARAMBIL HOUSE, EAST OTTAPPALAM,PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. RAMEENA.M,RESIDING AT REMI MANZIL, AMAKULAM,VADAKKENCHERY.PO,PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR,OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY,CALICUT UNIVERSITY.PO,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT,OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS,CALICUT UNIVERSITY.PO, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY MR. P.C. SASIDHARAN, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/06/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No. 15112 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 2nd June,2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioners, who have completed their Engineering Degree Course from a college affiliated to the University of Calicut, had written 6th, 7th and 8th Semester Supplementary Examinations held in June 2008. Apparently, dissatisfied by the marks obtained in the said examinations, they had applied for revaluation. They are aggrieved that the results of the revaluation have not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the Supplementary Examinations held in June 2008. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioners in relation to 6th W.P ( C) No. 15112 of 2009 2 7th and 8th Semester Examinations held in June 2008, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the applications for revaluation are in order and otherwise correct. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No. 15112 of 2009 3 W.P ( C) No. 15112 of 2009 4 (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No. 15112 of 2009 5 W.P ( C) No. 15112 of 2009 6