IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-28764 of 2009 Date of decision:03.11.2009. Amarjeet Singla alias Teena & others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. H.S.Dhindsa, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Pattar, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The parties to the impugned prosecution i.e. petitioners and respondent No.4 have compounded the offences and have placed on record documented compromise, which may be read as Annexure P-2. Petitioner Nos.1 to 8 & 10 were present on 27.10.2009 and owned up the compounding. Petitioner Nos.9, 11 and 12 and respondent No.4 are present in the Court and are identified by their respective counsel. They own up the compounding. They further state that presently there is no dispute subsisting between them. Their joint statement is also recorded separately. Joint statement of petitioner Nos.1 to 8 and 10 was recorded on 27.10.2009. In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.397 dated 25.08.2005, under Sections 406, 498-A, 506, 389 IPC, P.S. Kaithal City (Annexure P-1) shall stand quashed on account of compounding. November 03, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE