IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPU^_(C.GJ WRIT PETITION (S) N0.'?>5 <;3 OF 2010 ""'' PETITIONERS o ^^ ^~~.^-^ ..-^ 1." Omprakash Mishra, s/o B.P.Mishra, aged about42 years, Nehru, Nagar, Ganesh Chowk, Balram Bilaspur (C.G.) 2.' Rajesh Rathore, s/ o Late B.P. Rathore, aged about41 years, B.D.Mahant Up Nagar, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) :.-^v , 'y^i -• ^ t*' ..Si;*"' ....•••"' ,^t''~" ,.*a'*-rt^ / '^••-"v &w RESPONDENTS VERSUS ^ 1. Guru GhasidasCentral University, Bilaspur through it's Registrar, Guru Ghasidas Central University, Koni, Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. ' Executive Council, Guru Ghasidas Central University, Through Chairman of the Executive Council/ Vice Chancellor, Guru Ghasidas Central University, Bilaspur (C.G.). 3. The Union of India, through the, Secretary Department of Human Resources Developement, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi 4. ' Registrar, Ghasidas Central University, Bilaspur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950—FOR^ISSUANCEOF WRIT IN THENATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, ETC. AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR WRITS, ORDER OR ORDERS, DlRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. 1. PARTIGULARS OF THE PETITIONER u^^^^•IS ^^l^ fN^^^iiiS^^^?! iai :BASC';I'^'B;'^ •T3 '^fFIRTO; ri-dlwiii. ptdi'My sn^r TR^? .'yj.:.p.(s?..y0.:...?.2:.^/^'0 "(F(/ 200 Hwini aiiicti ft^CT' r"\.1] sn^iqii v^:'fe:lN 3T15RI Sti+IW •a1^Cf 311^1 TOITWtlfet S.BLHON'BLE MR. JUSTiCEPR!T 08-12-2010: Shri Aiok Bakshi, counse! for tj' Shri Ashish Shrivastava, coun^el Shri Vivek Singha!, Advocat^ counsel for respondent No. 3. Counse! for the petitloners appolnted on daiiy wages and sub^ Gyru Ghasidas University, Bitas^ur regularization order was withdravi/n] representation dated 25.2.2010 is pehdi the University and the ends of justij disposed of with a dlrection to thet decide the representation of the petitjf C.ounse! for the respondents is issued for deciding the pending rert in view of the above, the pi^ direction to the re.spondent No. 2 to the peSstioners as expeditiousiy as p|i from todsy. St is made clear that this Couli't merits of the case and the authorit decide ths representation. In accordaif csUf1<n41'T ^llq^f^^^ <F*I^K ^?3lPgii sii^i NKERDiWAKER fie. petitioners. for the respondents No. 1, 2 &4. 3 on behaff of Smt. Fouzia Mirza, >mits that the petitioners were initially sequentiy they were regularized by however, later on the said According to the petitioners, their ing before the Executh/e Council of ;e would be sen/ed if the petition is respondent No. 2 to considerand oners as expeditiousiy as possible ave no objection if any such direction iresentation of the petitioners. psent petition is disposed of with a ^ecide the pendlng representation of sssibSe preferably within favo months has not expressedany opinion on ty concerned wou!d be at liberty to hce with !aw. ,_—- Jc^~ Sd/- r.^^ V- ' .-^^ r-r^1fet