[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.513 OF 2006 Ashok Sahebrao Salunkhe ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Ms.D.R.Kamath Advocate for Applicant Mr.A.R.Patil A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 29, 2007 DATE : NOVEMBER 29, 2007 DATE : NOVEMBER 29, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant who is the Investigating Officer in C.R.No.24 of 2001 of Malwani Police Station, has preferred this application for expunging remarks made against him by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay in the judgment and order dated 28.2.2005 in Sessions Case No. 908 of 2001. The said remarks have been made in paragraphs 20 and 21 of the said judgment. The accused have been convicted in the said case. However, remarks came to be made against Investigating Officer for steps [-2-] not taken by the Investigating Officer during the investigation of the said case. 3. The learned APP states that there is no objection to the remarks being expunged. Looking to the evidence and the fact that accused came to be convicted and the statement made by the learned APP, the said remarks shall stand expunged. 4. Application is allowed in above terms. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]