IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2011 / 26TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 4118 of 2009(M) ------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. O.R.MADHU, S/O.RAMAN, AGEDF 41 YRS, BILL WRITER AT CHANDAKADAVU IN FEROKE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, RESIDING AT OLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, MANNARPPADAM, P.O.FEROKE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. K.MAHESH, S/O.PRASAD, AGD 32 YRS, BILL WRITER AT PUTHIYAPALAMKADAVU IN CHERUVANNUR NALLALAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH RESIDING AT KARIYIL HOUSE, CHERUVANNUR WEST, P.O.FEROKE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. V.P.KABEER,S/O.SEETHI, AGED 31 YRS, BILL WRITER AT VELLAYIKODE, KADAVUR IN PERUMUNNA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, RESIDING AT VIZHINTHINA, POTTAMMAL.P.O, PERUMUNNA, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.K.T.SHYAMKUMAR SRI.HARISH R. MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOZHIKODE. 3. FEROKE GRAMA PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, FEROKE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 4. CHERUVANNUR NALLALAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CHERUVANNUR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 5. PERUMUNNA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PERUMUNNA, KOZHIKODE DIST. WP(C) No.4118 of 2009 BY SRI.ARAVINDA KUMAR BABU,GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R1 & R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX: PETITIONERS EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1:- TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 23-1-2009 ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR. EXHIBIT P2:- TRUE COPY OF REPRESNTATION DATED 31-3-2009 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS AND OTHER SIMILARLY AFFECTED BILL WRITERS BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL TRUE COPY PS TO JUDGE jkk P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ------------------------- W.P (C) No.4118 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 17th March, 2011 J U D G M E N T Notice on admission was ordered by this Court on 25.2.2009, despite which, no process was remitted. There was no representation when defect was noted and the matter was posted before the Registry and hence posted before the Bench today. There is no representation to day as well. It appears that the petitioner is no more interested in the cause of action projected in the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE ma /True copy/ P.A to Judge