IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1204 of 2008 1. Rajeev Kumar s/o late Baijnath Prasad 2. Nabab Saheb 3. Pappi Kumar (Both sons of Rajiv Kumar) 4. Gita Devi w/o Rajiv Kumar 5. Mithu Sao @ Mithilesh Kumar S/o Hari Sao All r/o Mohalla Kurmi Tola, Mahrajganj, Bakriya Tola, P.S. Alamganj, Dist. Patna. ---- Petitioners Versus 1. State of Bihar 2. Munna Kumar S/o Ram Das Sah r/o Mohalla- Maharajganj P.S.Alamganj, Dist. Patna. --- Opp.Parties. For the Petitioners : Mr. Ram Hriday Prasad, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Atul Chandra APP ----------- 2 25.06.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 15.09.2008, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge- 3rd , Patna in Sessions Trial no. 194 of 2008. Let it be clarified at the outset by the said order the learned trial Court has disposed of two applications. The present one is directed against the order passed on the application filed by the petitioners seeking discharge under Sections 227 and 228 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Petitioners are facing charge(s) punishable under Section 307 and 386 of the Penal Code. It has been contended that the injuries sustained by the victim do not justify framing of charge under Section 307 of the Penal Code. Learned trial Court, on perusal of the materials available on record, found that the injury report, for the present, would definitely indicate the intention of the accused persons. It 2 has been held therein that the materials on record prima facie indicate implication of the petitioners in the crime and commission of offence(s) punishable under Section 307 of the Penal Code. Considering the scope of jurisdiction exercised by the learned trial Court and the findings recorded by it, this Court is of the view that the order does not require any interference. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)