THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.22768 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner holds a policy with the Life Insurance Corporation of India (for short ‘the Corporation’). He states that he used to update the policy by approaching the office at Gudiwada. The Corporation appears to have acquired another building in another part of the town, and decided to shift the office. The grievance of the petitioner is that the location of the proposed office is inconvenient to the policy- holders, apart from having access to. He seeks directions against the respondents to drop the idea of shifting the office. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned counsel for the respondents. Except that the petitioner holds a policy, he has no other relation with the Corporation. He happens to be one of the thousands and lakhs of policy-holders. The corporation cannot be expected to locate the office in such a way, as to suit the convenience of the policy- holders. It is not as if that a policy-holder has to attend the office physically, in frequent intervals. The only transaction, which he undertakes with the corporation, is, to pay the premium; and even that is collected by the concerned agent. A policy-holder would hardly have any necessity, or occasion to visit the office personally, and every aspect is taken care of, by the agent. This Court does not find any basis to entertain the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.23-10-2009. KO