IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16616 of 2010 PAPLU YADAV @ PAPPU YADAV . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 18/05/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a police case under Section-364 of Indian Penal Code is that he is not named in the F.I.R. Learned counsel for the State points out that the petitioner appears to be having antecedent as noticed in the impugned order of rejection. Considering the period of custody since 18.12.2009 let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Bakhtiarpur P.S. Case No.317/09. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)