1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 195 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5998 OF 2007 Dorf Ketal Chamicals (I) Pvt. Ltd. .. Appellant Vs Sohan Kumar Zha & Anr. .. Respondents -- Shri S.K. Talsania along with Ms Pallavi Dedhia i/by M/s. Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for the Appellant. -- CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.M. KHANWILKAR, J DATED : 16TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. This appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 29th February, 2008 vide which the learned Single Judge declined to interfere in the award passed by the Labour Court dated 26th February, 2007. 2. The contention raised before us is that the Labour Court as well as the learned Single Judge have fallen in error of law in appreciating the evidence on two grounds that the discharged 2 worlman was not a workman and the Appellant was not his employer. There is no dispute of the fact that the workman had produced some photographs with the Managing Director of the appellant-Company. He had also produced identity card in the court duly issued to him. Now the argument is that he was an employee of the Contractor and not that of the Appellant Company. If that be so, it was upon the appellant to discharge the onus. We, therefore, see no reason to interfere in the impugned order. The Appeal accordingly stands dismissed with no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE A.M.KHANWILKAR, J