IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40186 of 2008 KRISHNA RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 17-09-2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. It appears that the petitioner’s prayer for bail was earlier rejected by this Court on 22.5.2008 and liberty was given to him to renew his prayer for bail after completing one year in custody. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 15.9.2007 and thus has completed one year in custody. He further submitted that in the previous order date of custody was wrongly typed as ‘9.12.07’. In this connection he referred to the impugned order dated 29.1.2008 passed by the learned Sessions Judge and thus submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 15.9.2007. I find substance in the contention of learned counsel. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner, namely, Krishna Rai is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Saran at Chhapra in connection with Revilganj P.S. Case No. 32 of 2007. Both the bailors shall file affidavit in support of their means and fitness and one of the bailor shall be the father of the petitioner. S.Sb/- (Madhavendra Saran, J.)