1 conp8-11.sxw pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Contempt Petition No. 8 of 2011 in Notice of Motion No.4302 of 2007 in Suit No.3141 of 2007 Noel D’Souza .. Petitioner v/s. Frank D’Souza & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.Bhavik Manek i/b. Wadia Gandhy & Co. for the Petitioner CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 4th March, 2011 P.C. : 1. According to the petitioner certified copy of the Order of injunction was served upon the concerned defendants, against whom injunction was issued. In the body of the petition, there is no averment. Along with the petition no papers are served. This is being observed on the basis of statement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner. If this be so, the petition does not contain necessary material to arrive at the conclusion whether the order of injunction was served upon the 2 conp8-11.sxw defendant. 2. In this view of the matter, the petition is required to be rejected for want of proper papers before the court. Hence following order is passed. ORDER i) Petition is disposed of on the ground that there are no adequate papers. Needless to mention that the petitioners can make the grievance by filing proper petition with appropriate averments. Liberty to that extent is granted. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]