IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 17TH JULY 2007 / 26TH ASHADHA 1929 WP(C).No. 36813 of 2004(G) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------- ROSELY, W/O. P.L.DEVASYA, PANACKAL PURACKAL, BEACH WARD, ALAPPUZHA, NOW RESIDING AT THYPPARAMBU, BEACH WARD,ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. DIRECTOR OF TRAINING, INDUSTRIAL TRAINING DEPARTMENT, GOVT.OF KERALA, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE PRINCIPAL, ITI FOR WOMEN, CHENGANNOOR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.T.B.RAMANI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.36813/2004 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DT. 27.10.04 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P1(a):- COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPTS FOR SENDING THE REGISTERED LETTER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P1(b):- COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPTS FOR SENDING THE REGISTERED LETTER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT. 29.10.04 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2(a):- COPY OF THE CONSENT LETTER DT. 27.10.04. EXT.P2(b):- COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPTS OF SENDING REGISTERED LETTER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P2(c):- COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPTS OF SENDING REGISTERED LETTER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS EXT.R1(a):- COPY OF THE CONSENT LETTER DT. 29.10.04. EXT.R1(b):- COPY OF THE G.O(P) 87/96/FIN DT. 12.1.96. /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE tss THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.36813 OF 2004-G = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 17th day of July, 2007. JUDGMENT When this matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client confines her request for a direction to act on Ext.P2(a) and release the amounts after adjusting such amounts as may be payable. 2. It is stated in the counter affidavit that the DCRG amount is withheld only because, the Department could not release the same since the petitioner had filed a consent letter to adjust her DCRG towards liability. Under the aforesaid circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing that the amounts to be adjusted from the petitioner's account to the account of any creditor shall WP(C)36813/2004 -: 2 :- be given due credit on the basis of her consent and if any amount is remaining thereafter, that shall be released to the petitioner within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/-