’LO SY. UBJECTaPA m THE MRSTATE ADM‘NIS'TRATNE TRIBUNAL BENcH AT BHOPAL .A.No. ’ QO" 799' 'V IL!P KUMAR Sic Shri Dayaram Peon Working as Peon.R/o Ambedkar Ward No.7, Dongergarh DISTT. RAJNANDGAON APPLICANT VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH r Through The Secretary, ’ Depti‘ of Mahila Avam Bal Vikas, Vailabh Bhawan, Mantralayai‘ BHOPAL. RESPONDENTS THE COMMISSIONER, Mahila Avam Bal Vikas , Madhya PragleshEHOPAi. THE COLLECTOR, " DISTRICT- DURG(MP). THE DISTRI0T MAHILA AVAM BAL V!KAs ADHIKAR; DURG(MP) \ ’APPLICAT!O& UNDER SECTTON‘19 OF M.P.ADMINISTR‘ATI\/E TRIBUNALS V w ACT 1985 we CS) W/E o D “ : 2O anésmifém’m Hananéamim mwmsnéa SB: Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastav'a, J. .« t > 22.01.2010 When the matter wa‘ the petitioner and the matt round, nons appears for th‘ Shn' Arvind Dubey, in Taking into considen mserving liberty to the pet of action still survives. WW§WW aiwma Sinha h I Copy of this oxder be i called for/“hearing, none appeared for er was passed over. Even in the second : petitioner. anel Lawyer for the State] respondent. ition the nature of controversy involved in this petition, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution, tioner to revive the petition if the cause sent to the petitioner. /// / ///w’ smwgw $ aWw‘w" /// \\ saw“ “V / n93 i, , 5/ / / mm ami$ MPKQ92137F5 E 81mW (W) \