IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.12639 of 2009 Between: K.Jagannadham. … Petitioner And: The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad at Hyderabad and four others. … Respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri G.L.Narasimha Rao. Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for Home for R.1 to R.4. None for R.5. This Court made the following: ORDER:- The petitioner and respondent No.5 are involved in a civil dispute over Ac.1.04 guntas of land in Survey No.10 of Kohir Jujo Bilalpur village, Kohir Mandal, Medak District. In connection with the said dispute, the petitioner filed a complaint before respondent No.4, which was registered as Crime No.69 of 2009 for bouncing of the cheque allegedly issued by respondent No.5 in favour of the petitioner. According to the petitioner, as no further action was taken by the Police, respondent No.5 assaulted him with his henchmen and anti-social elements, in respect of which the petitioner allegedly lodged a complaint against respondent No.5 before respondent No.2 on 9-6-2009. It is the case of the petitioner that after receiving the said complaint, the Police went to the residence of respondent No.5 and on seeing them, the latter ran away and absconded. The petitioner stated that since thereafter respondent No.5 has been bringing antisocial elements to his house, abusing and threatening him by stating that unless he withdraws the case, they will kill him and his family members. The petitioner, therefore, filed the present Writ Petition for protection to him and his family members from respondent No.5. No counter affidavit is filed. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submitted that respondent No.2 registered a criminal case on the complaint filed by the petitioner and that no further complaint was received by respondent No.2. At the hearing, Sri G.L.Narasimha Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that complaint dated 9-6-2009 was personally received by respondent No.2 and that no action was taken by him thereon. As the petitioner wants proper action to be taken on his complaint, in accordance with law, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2 to take action, according to law, if he has received complaint dated 9-6-2009 from the petitioner. The petitioner is also permitted to approach respondent No.2 with a copy of complaint dated 9-6-2009 and on receipt of the same, respondent No.2 shall act and take appropriate action thereon. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:13-7-2009 Note: Issue CC in three days. (BO) MNR