F ^ IN THE HIGILCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cl N0. ^6^ /2010 WRIT PETITION VNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTI'nUTION OF THE INDIA PETITIONER (-»••" Shiv Prasad Gabel S/o. Shri ,et"* ^....•••"(^{.(.l Ashwani Prasad, aged about f A<*^ /I ^*t . . -. - - .- ^. f"\ /—<<y^n—^^^ i^i ^ 1 —^.? &^--"" txe^^':,..>' '^-••"' RESPONDENTS •"* 42 years, R/o. Village - Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS ^l. Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) / 2. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) ISGHe01EMT^£rHHAtiFIS©ARHATBIBASPUR •WmTi>ETITION:fej ^.5560<^ PETmONER RESPONBENTS Shiy Prasad Gabel VERSUS:' •• : ; • :: Regional Transport Aufhority & •Another ?;• WETT PETITION UNDER ARTIGLE 226 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA SB:Hon'bleShriSatish^K.Asnihotri,J. I*resent: Shri Anshul R. Slnivastava, Adyocate &r the petitioner Shri^.P,Bhatia»Depyiy^©oyemmentAdypc^^ ORDER(QRAL) (Passed0 24 ^% September, 2010) The petitfcner has filed; Ihis p Regional TraHSjpoH AuthQritytt) eonsider his a^ possible.,' ::'. ;: .: :: „: •-; ; .,''•-, : -; • There is^ no preseriptioh jn any statutory rule to consider the application witNa a prescribed tmie. U depend& upon the conyening of fhemeetingand, as such, m? airection can te issue^^ at thisstage. Hcwev^ft is expef^d that the responderit a^ may kiok mto'tBe grievance ofthe petitioner.,and do the needful,^^^^ earlyaspossible.'' ^ , AccDrdmgly,thewritpetitionis<lisposedo£ ^;.ffltodt(v ICiowri yf°^^