KM HtGH COURT OF CHHATTISG£RH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (227i No.6087I2009 PETiTiONER Laxman Prasad Sharma, S/o Late Bechenram Sharma, aged about 63 years, Present Address Village Maadpai, P’S. Nagajnar, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh), PreSent Address -— Vinage Manjhiguda, Karlahandi, Post Chandali (Urisa) Versus RESPONDENT Smt. Rajeshwan‘ Devi, Wfo Laxman Prasad Sharma, aged about 6O years, Resident of Ganga Nagar Ward, Jagadalpur, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETlTiON UNDER ARTECLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION v OF INDM Aggearance : Shn' Prakaeh Tiwari, Counsel for the petitioner. ORAL OREER (26.10.2(i09) UNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on admission.” The petitioner/husband has filed this petition challenging the validity of order dated 25.07.2009 passed by I Additionai District Judge, Bastar at Jagdaipur, in Civil Suit (Matrimonial) No.6—A/2007, an application filed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage whereby, Act, 1955 has been allowed by the said Court and maintenance pendants iite of Rs.2000/— and expenses of the proceedings of Rs.3000/— have been awarded to the respondent/wife. Admittedly, the respondent is aged about 6O years and the fiationship of husband and wife has not been disputed by the S / G W.P.(227) 2 No.6087/2009 f, petitioner. The learned trial Judge has observed that the petitioner was receiving pension of Rs.6000l— per month and he has some agricultural land also and in these facts and circumstances of the case, the aforesaid amount of maintenance as also expenses of the proceedings have been awarded. After going through the contents of the impugned order, l do not find any irregularity or infirmity in the said Otder passed by the learned triai Judge. The petition has no merit. The same is liabie to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed at the motion stage itself. fwwii; y,“ t. SUNEL Judge /