IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 24TH MAY 2011 / 3RD JYAISHTA 1933 RP.No. 303 of 2011(D) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.31750/2007 Dated 30/06/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONERS 1 TO 3 ---------------------------------------- 1. ABHILASH M.P., MANGALATH HOUSE, KANJIRAMCHIRA P.O., ALAPPUZHA. (WORKING AS EXECUTIVE TRAINEE, MARKETING TEA COUNTY, KTDC LTD., MUNNAR). 2. BEJOY P.V., PANATHUPARAMBIL, KALAVUR P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT (WORKING AS EXECUTIVE TRAINEE, MARKETING, WATER SCAPES, KTDC LTD., KUMARAKOM). 3. SURAJ S., THONNIKUZHIYIL HOUSE, THENGUMKAVU P.O., MALLASSERY, PATHANAMTHITTA. (WORKING AS EXECUTIVE TRAINEE, MARKETING, CORPORATE OFFICE, KTDC LTD., TRIVANDRUM-14). BY ADV. SMT.AYSHA YOUSEFF SMT.MOLLY JACOB SRI.JOBI.A.THAMPI SMT.ARATHI KARUNAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. KERALA TOURIST DEVELOPMENT CORPROATION LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MASCOT SQUARE, TRIVANDRUM-695 033. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. G.RAMESH KUMAR, SENIOR OFFICE ASSISTANT, MARKETING DIVISION, HEAD OFFICE, KERALA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695 033. /2/ 4. B.R.RABITHA KURUP, HOUSE KEEPER, MARKETING DIVISION, HEAD OFFICE, KERALA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695 033. 5. SANTHOSH KUMAR.S., RECEPTIONIST, HOLDING THE CHARGE OF MOTEL ARAAM, KERALA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA-690 502. SC FOR R1 SRI. P.A. AHAMED BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. L. G. SURESH BABU THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` R.P. No. 303 of 2011 in W.P.(C) No. 31750 of 2007 D ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 24th day of May, 2011 O R D E R ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ The petitioners filed W.P.(C) No.31750/2007, praying for a direction to regularise them in the post of Deputy Manager (Marketing) under the first respondent. That writ petition was disposed of by Annexure-I judgment, directing that, if the post is filled up by direct recruitment, the claim of the petitioners will also be considered. In this review petition, referring to Annexure-II, petitioners submit that many similarly situated contract appointees were regularised in the service of the first respondent and that it was because of certain observations in the judgment that they were not considered for regularisation. 2. In any case, Annexure-II and the consequential regularisation relied on by the petitioners is a development R.P. No.303/2011 : 2 : subsequent to the disposal of the writ petition and, therefore, if the petitioners are aggrieved by the denial of regularization or their termination, it is for the petitioners to work out their remedies in appropriate proceedings, in which event their claims will be considered untrammeled by the findings in the judgment. Therefore, clarifying the position as above, this review petition is disposed of. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/25.05