1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT J O D H P U R ::: ORDER In S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.3683/2009 Gopal & others v. State of Rajasthan ::: Date of Order: 16th July, 2009 ::: P R E S E N T HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr B.S. Rathore, for the petitioenrs Mr Anees Bhurat, Public Prosecutor for the State ::: By the Court: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the relevant material/case diary made available to me during the arguments of the case. It is contended on behalf of petitioners that admittedly a charge sheet was submitted against accused petitioners for offences under secs.302, 397, 460, 120B & 411 IPC but learned trial court i.e. Additional Sessions Judge (FT), Rajsamand by its order dated 20th June, 2009 has discharged the accused petitioners from other offences except under secs.412 & 414 IPC. It is contended that accused Gopal has been charged under secs.412, 414 IPC and accused Sukh Lal has been charged with offence under 2 of 2 sec.414 IPC. A certified copy of the order dated 20th June, 2009 has been placed on record. The accused petitioners are in jail since March, 2009. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, I think it just and proper to release the accused-petitioners, namely, 1] Gopal s/o Rama, 2] Sukh Lal s/o Mohan Lal on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., in F.I.R. No. 103/2008, Police Station- Kunwariya, District- Rajsamand, registered under secs.302, 397, 460, 411 & 120B, IPC, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) together with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court for their appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. This bail application is allowed accordingly. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J. mma