IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.602 of 2006(M/B) 1. Smt. Kala W/o Shri Devendra Singh, R/o Bhatt Colony, Shiv Parvati Niwas, Talli Bamori, Police Station, Haldwani, District Nainital. 2. Saurabh S/o Sri Devendra Singh R/o Bhatt Colony, Shiv Parvati Niwas, Talli Bamori, Police Station, Haldwani, District Nainital. .......... Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Superintendent of Police, District Nainital 2. Station House Officer, Police Station – Haldwani, District Nainital 3. Pratap Singh Mahar S/o Shri Johar Singh, R/o Himanshy Cottage, Canal Road, Shish Mahal, Kathgodam, District Nainital ........... Respondents .......... Sri Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri H.C.Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. Sri I.S.Mahara, Advocate for respondent no. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Sri Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri H.C.Pande, Additional Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. Sri I.S.Mahara, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 2. Sri H.C.Pande, the learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them now has 2 become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation has submitted charge-sheet against the petitioners before the concerning Court. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. With the above order, CLMA No. 7320 of 2006 also stands disposed of. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 22.06.2006 22.06.2006 A