IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No 10025 of 2009 Sunil Mahto, son of late Tara Mahto, Village - More, P S - Mokama, District - Patna - Petitioner Versus 1 The Union of India through P G M (BSNL), Telephone Bhawan, Yarpur, Patna 2 Divisional General Manager (Planning Area Manager) BSNL Patna Telephone Bhawan, Yarpur, Patna 3 DET (Rural BSNL) Patna Telephone Bhawan, Yarpur, Patna 4 DE, BSNL Telephone Bhawan, Yarpur, Patna 5 Sub Divisional Officer, BSNL, Patna Telephone Bhawan, Barh, Patna 6 Junior Telecome Officer, BSNL, Telephone Department, Mokama (Hathidah), PS & PO - Mokama, District - Patna - Respondents ----------- 2 19.08.2009 The petitioner claims to have been working as a daily wages Mazdoor with BSNL. He claims regularization as a 04th grade employee. In my view, the writ petition at this stage is misconceived inasmuch as the grievance of the petitioner is to be redressed first by the Central Administrative Tribunal which now is competent to entertain such applications. The writ petition is dismissed with leave granted to the petitioner to move the Central Administrative Tribunal, if so advised. M.E.H./ (Navaniti Prasad Singh)