IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.7033 of 2009 Between: Nalluri Veera Raghavulu S/o. Subrahmanyam, R/o. Kavali, SPS Nellore District. ...PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector SPS Nellore, SPS Nellore District. 2 Tahsildar Bogole Mandal, Bogole, SPS Nellore District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to declare the action of the 2nd respondent in not taking action for rectification of entries in respect of Ac. 33-86 cents in S.No. 605 to 608 and Ac. 54-38 cents in S.No. 888/1 of Jakepalli, Guduru Village, Bogole Mandal, Potti Sri Ramulu, Nellore District in spite of judgment and decree in O.S. No. 46 of 2001 on the file of Court of Senior Civil Judge, Kavali as illegal, arbitrary and unjust by issuing appropriate writ or order more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.V.S.SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.7033 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.46 of 2001 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Kavali, for the relief of declaration of title and injunction over an extent of Acs.33.86 cents in Survey Nos.605 of 608 and Acs.54.38 cents in Survey No.888/1 of Jakepalli-Guduru Village, Bagole Mandal, Nellore District, against the respondents herein. That suit is said to have been decreed on 31.10.2005. It is also stated that the decree became final. The petitioner filed an application before the second respondent to correct/rectify the entries in the revenue records on the strength of the decree. His grievance is that, though several years had elapsed, so far, no action has been taken. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. The petitioner submitted application in the year 2006 and this was followed by the legal notice. The claim is based upon a decree. In case, the decree has become final, the second respondent is under obligation to make or alter entries in conformity to decree. There cannot be any justification to keep the matter pending for years together. The Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the second respondent to pass appropriate orders on the representation/application made by the petitioner in respect of the lands to an extent of Acs.33.86 cents in Survey Nos.605 of 608 and Acs.54.38 cents in Survey No.888/1 of Jakepalli-Guduru Village, Bagole Mandal, Nellore District, on the basis of the decree dated 31.10.2005 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Kavali, within a period of three {3} months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ (L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J) 6th April 2009 RRB