IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31828 of 2010 Narsingh Yadav Versus State Of Bihar ----------- 4/ 3.8.2011 Heard. Petitioner’s prayer for bail was rejected by my order dated 22.12.2009 because this Court wanted the construction work to be completed in connection with which there was allegation that he was not allowing the work to proceed. Attention of the court has been drawn to Annexure 3, which is letter no. 0 dated 18.2.2010 under the signature of the Junior Engineer, Piprasi, who has reported that the construction work was stalled in want of fund and as soon as the department would get the fund, the work shall be started. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner Narsingh Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Bagaha, West Champaran in Piprasi P.S. Case no. 24 of 2007 (S.Tr. No. 250 of 2010) with following conditions: (1) That as and when the construction of the bridge starts the petitioner shall not interfere with the same; (2) If in case the petitioner is reported interfering with the construction of the bridge in any manner and specially so as to obstructing the same by placing a demand for Rangdari, the court 2 below, i.e., ACJM, Bagaha shall assume that this order had not been passed by this court and shall take steps for committing the petitioner to custody. (3) If the petitioner is found again having indulged in committing the same class of offence at any place and the report is duly made to the police, the court below being satisfied about the report, shall pass the same order as at sl. No. 2. (4) The petitioner shall appear before officer-in-charge, Piprasi police station every fortnight and his appearance shall be recorded in the station diary entry. Let a copy of this order be transmitted to the Superintendent of Police, Bagaha (West Champaran) for information and compliance. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)