1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.22/2011 (State of Maharashtra Vs. Ravindra @ Balya Govindra Gavande) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr. S.S. Doifode, APP for Applicant/State. Mr. Giripunje, Advocate for Respondent. .......... CORAM : P.D. KODE, J DATED : APRIL 25, 2011 Heard. By the present application, State has sought cancellation of bail granted to the applicant by learned 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur on 09.02.2011 in connection with Crime No. 252/2010 registered with Ganeshpeth Police Station on 20.12.2010 for an offence punishable under Section 302 r/w 34 of the IPC. The said offence was registered in connection with an incident which had occurred at about 1.30 am in a night in between 28/29 December 2010 in which one Bhawani Singh was murdered due to assault allegedly effected by applicant knife. The same was registered on the basis of FIR lodged by brother of the deceased namely Bahadursingh. The investigation in the said crime is complete and the charge sheet is submitted on 25.03.2011 by the said Police Station. 2 After considering the reasoning recorded in paragraph 6 and 7 of order granting bail, it is extremely difficult to accept the submission of the learned APP that the learned Additional Sessions Judge has then not taken into consideration the material available against the applicant. The said reasoning in terms reveals that the material available against the applicant and particularly in the statement of witnesses namely Aniket Gaikwad, Parimal Goswami and Amit Sharma has been duly taken into consideration while considering the prayer for bail made by the applicant. Similarly the reasoning in paragraph 7 also reveals that the submission of prosecution about the antecedents of applicant has been also duly considered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. Having regard to the same, it is difficult to find any merit in the application. Needles to add that the learned APP was candid enough to admit that no misuse of the bail granted has been reported to the Investigating Agency. In view of the same, the application deserves to be dismissed and stands dismissed accordingly. JUDGE Nikhare