1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.6172/2010 [M/s. Mayur Fishing Corporation Jt. Venture Co. .vrs. State of Maharashtra and another] ................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................................... Shri S.W. Sambre, Advocate for petitioner, Mrs. K.S. Joshi, AGP for respondent no.1, Shri P.C. Madkholkar, Advocate for respondent no.2. .......... CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 28, 2011. The petitioner claims that he was lowest and, therefore, work order ought to have been issued to him. However, the challenge in this petition is to a decision taken by the respondent no.2 cancelling entire process on 18th September, 2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that after cancelling the said process, the work has been given to the respective cooperative societies already operating on the said tank. After hearing all advocates, we find that the time required in the process of finalization due to 2 court proceedings has been given as reason for cancellation. Similarly, the decision further shows that work was to be given to the cooperative societies. How work thereafter allotted and whether that allotment is in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India is not being demonstrated. The societies, who have been allotted that work, are not the parties in this petition. We, therefore, find no case warranting interference. The petition is, therefore, rejected. No cots. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande