IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.12308 of 2011 Date of Decision : July 26, 2011. Raj Kumar .....Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.B.S.Baath, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner was a candidate for the post of Vocational Teacher (Computer Science) but he could not appear for counselling due to over-sight/inadvertent mistake. He now seeks a direction for sympathetic re-consideration of his candidature and to give opportunity to him to appear for counselling. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered view that the mitigating circumstances, if any, which may prompt the authorities to give one more opportunity of consideration to the petitioner, need to be brought to the notice of the authorities for their sympathetic consideration. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of CWP No.12308 of 2011 [2] with liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation which shall be considered by respondent No.3 sympathetically though in accordance with Rules. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 26, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE