IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.29193 of 2009 DHUJAN SINGH @ AJAY SINGH @ GHUJAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 31.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered for the offence under Sections 414 and 175 of the Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner transpired only on the strength of confessional statement of co-accused Sanjay Kumar Kasera. Car has been recovered from the possession of Sanjay Kumar Kasera. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in fact no recovery of any stolen article has been made from the house of petitioner. This court finds that an observation is made in the last paragraph of the impugned order that some of the seized articles have been recovered from the house of this accused/petitioner. Learned counsel on the strength averments made in this application, particularly, those in paragraph nos. 7 and 9 submits that no recovery of any article has been made. Let the trial court verify the aforesaid statement and if it is found that there was no recovery of stolen article has been made from the house of petitioner, trial court shall be released the petitioner on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Town (Nawada) P.S. case no. 70 of 2009 (G.R. No. 345 of 2009) subject to the conditions that one of the bailors should be close relative of the petitioner. Uday/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)