IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.845 OF 2009 Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi ... Petitioner Versus The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Districts and others. ... Respondents Mr. Susheel Mahadeshwar i/by Ms. R.J. Todankar for the petitioner. Ms. Pallavi Divekar for the respondent No.1. Mr. S.C. Naidu i/by M/s. C.R. Naidu & Co. for the respondent No.2. Mr. K.S. Bapat i/by M/s. Desai & Desai Associates for the respondent No. 3. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 11TH AUGUST, 2009 P.C. The learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that the controversy raised in the present petition by the petitioner as well as contesting respondents has squarely been covered and decided in accordance with law by respondent No.5 by keeping in mind the Division Bench Judgment of this court in Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi v. Security Guards Board for Gr. Bombay & Thane Dist. and others, 2007(5) Bom. C.R. 405 (Exhibit `E' to the petition". 2. In view of the joint request, we dispose of the petition with direction to the Advisory Committee of the Board under the provisions of the Act to decide the controversy as expeditiously as possible after hearing the parties. Petition be filed before them within two weeks from today. CHIEF JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.