1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8572 OF 2009 _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office } Memoranda of Coram, } Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's } orders or directions } and Registrar's orders } ___________________________}___________________________________ Mr. M.V.Navandar, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. A.D.Kasliwal, Advocate for respondent no. 1. ........................... [ CORAM : B.R.GAVAI, J. ] DATE : 16/12/2009. PER COURT : 1. Since the petition arises out of concurrent findings of facts, that too out of interlocutory proceedings and further not noticing any perversity therein, I am not inclined to entertain the present Writ Petition under the extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petition is, therefore, rejected. 2. However, taking into consideration the nature of dispute, the learned trial court is directed to decide and dispose of the Suit as expeditiously 2 as possible and preferably within six months from today. [ B.R.GAVAI ] JUDGE knp/WP8572.09