IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2030 of 2010 RUKIMINI KUMARI . Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. . ----------- 02. 19.01.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ Court had directed the Divisional Commissioner to dispose the appeal. An order passed by the District Magistrate dated 6.8.2010 shall not amount to compliance. Learned counsel for the State submits that the Divisional Commissioner passed final orders disposing the appeal on 1.4.2010 satisfied that further factual enquiry was required and remanded the matter to the District Magistrate for passing fresh orders after enquiry which has been done. An order of remand for a fresh factual enquiry and re-determination also amounts to disposal of the appeal insofar as the contempt jurisdiction is concerned. Learned counsel for the petitioner strenuously sought to persuade this Court that the fresh order of the District Magistrate dated 6.8.2010 was not sustainable in law. That is an aspect which can be examined only in a fresh writ application to be filed by the petitioner, if so advised. The contempt proceeding stands disposed. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)