IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.282 of 2011 SUCHITA DEVI wife of Devkant Prasad, Resident of Lakhan Sarai Tej Singh, P.S-Lalganj Dist-Vaishali. Petitioner / Appellant Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director of Welfare, Government, Bihar Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Cum-Collector, Vaishali. 4. The Sub Divisional Officer, Lalganj, Vaishali. 5. The Executive Magistrate, Vaishali. 6. The Child Development Project Officer, Lalganj. 7. The District Programme Officer, Vaishali. …… Respondents / Respondents ----------- For the Appellant : Mr,. Barun Kr. Chaudhary, Advocate For the State : M/s Manoj Kr. Ambastha, G.P. 14 ` Subodh Kumar, A.C. to G.P. 14 -------- 3 19.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State. After going through Clauses 11 and 12 of the guidance issued by the State Government relating to Aganbari Sewika dated 25.7.2008 and the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Prabha Kumari v. State of Bihar & Ors. (2010(2) PLJR 374), we find no merit in the submission that the dis- engagement of the appellant from the post to Aganbari Sewika could not have been done by the District 2 Programme Officer. In fact, the appellant knew that the power of the District Magistrate was that of the appellate authority and annexure 1 to the writ petition shows that the appeal has been rejected by the District Magistrate concerned. We find no error in the views of the learned writ court. The appeal is without any merits. It is dismissed accordingly. Spd/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)