1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.4770/2007 (Vardhman Surana Vs. State) Date of order : 25th September, 2007. HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Mukul Singhvi for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Mr. K.R. Bhati for complainant. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the complainant. Perused the order impugned as well as case the challan papers. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties and the fact that the prosecutrix in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C before the Judicial Magistrate, Nagaur, has stated that she at her own went with the petitioner and visited various cities of the country and married with the petitioner in a temple, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Vardhman Surana s/o Narpat Surana be released on bail in FIR No.245/2007 P.S. Kotwali, Nagaur, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his 2 appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. vij