THE HONBLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.4464 of 2006 ORAL ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive. Accordingly, the Wit Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. 18.06.2008. Kgr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.4464 of 2006 Between: Chall Laxminarayana S/o. Appanna, aged about 65 years, R/o Akulatampara village & Post, Hiramanda Via Kothuru Mandal, Srikakulam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Deputy Registrar of Coop. Societies Tekkali Tekkali Post & Mandal, Srikakulam District. 2 The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Mandal Parishad, Kothuru Mandal, Srikakulam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the order of the 1st Respondent in his proceedings Rc. No. 36/2006-D dt. 20-2-2006 disqualifying the petitioner as a Committee Member (Director) of Kotturu PACS is illegal, arbitrary, and without jurisdiction and set aside the same as illegal and consequently to direct the 1st Respondent to continue the petitioner as a Director of the Managing Committee of the Kotturu PACS and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.S. SIVA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERATION Mr. M. Prabhakara Rao The Court made the following: