1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21377 of 2011 Gautam Kumar S/o Gajadhar Prasad, R/o Mohalla- Nadraganj, P.S. Civil Lines, District-Gaya. --Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar --Opp.party 3 19.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is one of the named accused in this case relating to recovery of medicines at railway station with allegation of transporting or booking without any valid licence. Submission is that petitioner being son in law of owner of Roshni Pharma who was entrusted to deal with such medicine which were booked with the Railway properly and subsequently in the light of the order dated 21st July, 2011 passed by learned Second Additional Sessions Judge in Cr.Rev. no. 39 of 2011 / 73 of 2011 released in favour of the firm. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, who is armed with the carbon copy of the case diary which is up to paragraph 254 submits that 2 investigation is still pending though nothing specific could emerge against the petitioner what is asserted in the first information report. In the facts and circumstances, the petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Gaya Rail P.S. Case no. 127 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present before the court below on each and every date for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be canceled. AAhmad ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)