..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.650 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.550 OF 2008 Vaishali Sanjay Pawar. ..Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents. .... Mr.S.V.Kotwal, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 25th June, 2008. DATED : 25th June, 2008. DATED : 25th June, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant-orig.accused No.6 and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant-orig. accused No.6 has been convicted under Section 306 read with 34 of IPC and sentenced to suffer RI for one year. The applicant is now seeking bail. 3. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant was on bail during the trial and she has not misused the liberty granted to him. This statement has not been controverted ..(2).. by the prosecution. The applicant is a lady and she has minor children. The learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that the sentence of imprisonment imposed on the applicant is only one year and the appeal is not likely to be heard within the said time. 4. Looking to the above facts and the evidence on record, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 5. The applicant - Vaishali Sanjay Pawar be released on bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rs.Fifteen Thousand Only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. 6. Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)