IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 26TH OCTOBER 2009 / 4TH KARTHIKA 1931 RP.No.768 of 2009(J) ------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WP(C).27395/2007 Dated 02/12/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS: -------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (FFP.B) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA. BY MS. M.R.SREELATHA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: ------------------------------ MANDAKINI,W/O.LATE ETTIYATHI DIVAKARAN, MADATHIL VELIYIL, MANNANCHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA - 688 538. BY MR.K.K. SATHISH, ADVOCATE. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ---------------------------------------- Review Petition No.768 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C) No.27395 OF 2007 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of October, 2009. O R D E R This review petition is filed against the findings rendered by this Court in paragraph 4 of the judgment to the effect that “the circular cannot go against the main part of the scheme itself and cannot whittle down the same”, which amounts to an apparent error in the judgment as the amended Rule 23 of the Kerala Freedom Fighters Rules will govern the matter. 2. The learned counsel for respondent-writ petitioner submitted that the Government has been granting pension in respect of various persons even after the amendment without insisting for the primary evidence in support of the application. Whatever that be, in the judgment sought to be reviewed, the direction is only to reconsider the application and pass R.P.No.768/2009 2 appropriate orders in the matter. Therefore, there is no error apparent in the judgment. This review petition is dismissed. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp