THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2739 OF 2010 Dated 6th August, 2010 Between: S.Ameer Basha and three others …Petitioner And M/s Shriram Chits Pvt Ltd …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri B.Naga Jaya Chandra Reddy Counsel for the respondents: Sri Kanchem Maheswara Rao The Court made the following ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition arises out of order dated 28.04.2010 in E.P.No.165 of 2008 in O.S.No.304 of 2004 on the file of the Court of the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kurnool (for short “the Court below”). The petitioners are judgment debtors in O.S.No.304 of 2004 filed by the respondent. It is not in dispute that the decree passed in the suit has become final. Admittedly, petitioner No.1 is a businessman; petitioners 2 and 3 are the Line Inspector and Line Man respectively in A.P.Transco and petitioner No.4 is an employee in an Eye Hospital. Petitioners 2 to 4 are the guarantors to the debt contacted by petitioner No.1. On the basis of the evidence placed before the Court below, it has come to the conclusion that petitioner No.1 being a business man and petitioners 2 and 3 being the employees of A.P Transco and petitioner No.4 being an employee in an Eye Hospital, they have sufficient means to pay and that in spite of the same, they have neglected. On the above premise, the Court below has apportioned the liability of each of the petitioners at Rs.43,078/- and allowed the application filed by the decree holder-respondent by ordering their arrest and detention in a civil prison for realisation of the said amount from each of the petitioners. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners and perusing the record, I am of the opinion that the findings of the Court below are based on the evidence on record and I have no reason to interfere with the said findings. For the abovementioned reasons, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition, interim order dated 06.07.2010 is vacated and CRPMP No.3680 of 2010 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 6th August, 2010 vrn