Crl. Misc. No.M-31259 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-31259 of 2010 Date of Decision: October 26, 2010 Darshan Singh …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. R.K. Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) The petitioner claims that he has been falsely implicated by Harnek Singh, real brother of the petitioner in a case of assault vide FIR annexure P-1. Through instant petition inherent jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked for a direction to get the matter fairly enquired/ investigated by any other agency. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted representations annexures P-2 and P-3 to SSP, District Ludhiana, Crl. Misc. No.M-31259 of 2010 [2] to look into the grievance of the petitioner pertaining to the same occurrence dated January 9, 2009 which forms the subject matter of the FIR annexure P-1. After going through the facts and circumstances of this case, I do not find it a fit case to exercise inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to issue a direction to the higher police authorities to further re- investigate the case especially when the prosecution agency has not till date made up its mind to present challan against the petitioner. So far as the grievance of the petitioner i.e. counter-version has not been recorded, it will be open to the petitioner to avail the legal remedy available to him in accordance with law. Disposed of. October 26, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE