EN T; Petitioner WRI f Mb“ m: Vat/”x v v L Singm 3am K. @ O/g\ Hf: HTGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATFISGARE AT W. " %BILASPUR . é 2604 Ram Jurri; Aged about 50 years, Suspended Assistant Teacher; Blogk Development Kanker; Tah & Dist Kanker, R/o Village Urkuda (Lakhanpmj Block Development~Charama, Tah 85 Dist '. Kahker {C.G.). State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretajy Home Department of Adim Jati Kalyan Vibhag, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur— (CG) The Collector, Kanker Dist : Kanker (C.G.). The Commissioner, Tribal Development Chhattisgarh, Dist : Raipur—(C.G.) T PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 / 227 OF THE ONSTITUTION OF INDIA WE?? A g /Ayat Ram Jurri, S/o Late Shri Khirmidh Q—\ ? XI—HC——78 WWW :, WW3? Wgym E .W«P‘Mo. 4—6 mm (Wm mmm WW’m§WWM¥ %3ifm‘a¥!3¥r etitioner submits that the original application No. 34/2000 was pending before State Administrative Tribunal , Bench at Raipur. He State has been filed in the said limited prayer that this writ petition be disposed ofwith a direction to call/transfer the said original appli is pending as the matter stands abolition ofsthe S.A.T. and there i matter to this Court, as the matter manner. State does not oppose this li] The prayer is allowed. Let records of O.A. No. 3 Court. rThe petition stands finally d Certified copy asper rules. 10.02.2005 Shri Rakesh Antony, counsel for the petitioner. Lawyer for the State. Shri Sudhir Agrawal, Panel Heard. Learned counsel for the p further submits that the return of original application. He makes a :ation from S.A.T. or whereever it transferred as per the Act atter s no impediment in transfering the s are to be transferred in a routine nited prayer. 4/2000 be transferred to the High isposed of. ‘ Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge