1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATIONPETITION NO.428 OF 2009 Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority .. Petitioner -versus NCC Ltd and 3ors .. Respondents. Mr. Gaurav Joshi with Kiran Gandhi i/b Little & Co. for the Petitioners Mr. Devvrat Dhankar i/b S.S. Phadker for the respondents. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED: 15th February, 2010 P.C. 1. In a petition under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, l996, the parties have settled all the claims arising out of the contract dated 16th July, 2003 apart from awarded amount and therefore, signed the consent terms. The consent terms are marked ‘X’. It is signed by Mr. Arjun G. Korgaonkar, an Officer on behalf of plaintiff and also by Mr. Jitendra V Kikavat, Managing Director for the Defendant . The consent terms are also counter signed by respective advocates. There is no objection of any kind with regard to the signature, authorization and identity of the person/parties. A statement is made that consent terms are well within the framework of law and 2 record and that no third person and/or parties will be affected by these consent terms. In view of this, the present Arbitration petition is disposed of. ( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)