IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.35737 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 28, 2011 Manpreet Kaur & another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Suresh Mankotia, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. This marriage was performed one month ago and thereafter the petitioners have statedly stayed at their matrimonial home. They have now come up with this petition that there is a threat to their life and liberty. To me, it appears that the marriage date has been wrongly given because of the restraint order passed by this court. Even the couple is not present. In my view, there is no apprehension of threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners in view of the facts and circumstances of the present case. I am, therefore, not inclined to interfere in such petitions. Dismissed. November 28, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE