((-1-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1024 OF 2009 Pooja Devang Gandhi & anr. Applicant versus State of Maharashtra & ors. Respondents Sonal D. Salaskar for applicant. A.T.Javeri, APP for the State. Santosh Marwadi for respondents 2 and 3. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 17th April 2009 PC : 1. Rule. Learned APP waives service for the first respondent. Learned advocate for second and third respondents waives service. 2. Prayer in this application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is for quashing the FIR alleging commission of offence under sections 454, 380, 341 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code. The third respondent is the first informant. The second and third respondents have tendered on record an affidavit. A perusal of the FIR and the said affidavit shows that essentially the dispute ((-2-)) appears to be as regards possession of a residential flat. The averments made in the application as well as affidavit of the second and third respondents show that now there is a complete settlement between the parties as regards dispute relating to the said flat. Considering the facts of the case, no purpose will be served by continuing the prosecution in view of the amicable settlement between the parties. 3. Hence, I pass following order :- (a) Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (A.S.OKA, J.)