IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.360 of 2008 SMT. RANJU DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS For the Petitioner: M/s.Ranjan Kr.Singh, Rajesh Kumar Sinha For the State: Mr.A.Amanullah,SC 17, Mr.Jawed Gaffar Khan,AC to SC 17 2 4.2.2009 KHAN Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has earlier filed a case being Hawai Adda P.S. Case No.8 of 2008 dated 16.1.2008, Annexure-1, under sections 448, 323, 379, 504 of the Indian Penal Code against Narendra Singh(Respondent no.10), Chintu Kumar(Respondent no.11) and his mother. He further submits that respondent no.10 Narendra Singh has filed a case being Hawai Adda P.S. Case No.7 of 2008 dated 16.1.2008 under sections 448, 323, 379 and 504 of the Penal Code against Ramadhar Singh, husband of the petitioner. He submits that respondent no.10 has falsely implicated the petitioner’s husband as he was on duty on the relevant date in Sonu P.S. under Jamui district. Learned State counsel has filed a counter affidavit stating that after due investigation charge sheet has been filed in Hawai Adda P.S. Case No.7 of 2008 against Ramadhar Singh under sections 341, 327, 504 of the Penal Code. However, the allegation under section 379 of the Penal Code was found to be false. In view of the counter affidavit filed by the State counsel, I do not find any ground for interfering in this case and as such this court is not inclined to grant any positive direction. However, it will be open to the petitioner to move appropriate court if she is aggrieved by any subsequent order of the court. With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J) - 2 -