1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Writ Petition No. 460 /2006 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, : Appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S.A. Jaiswal, , Advocate for the Petitioner, Mr. Y.B. Mandpe, APP for the respondent/State. .......... CORAM : K. J. ROHEE & C. L. PANGARKAR, JJ DATED : OCTOBER 13, 2006 Heard. 2. The petition does not disclose the date on which the petitioners applied for grant of parole to the competent authority. All that mentioned in para 3 of the petition is that the petitioner applied to the respondent, but the respondent refused as the petitioners are grandsons of the deceased. We are not satisfied from the statement that the petitioners ever made an application for grant of parole to the competent authority. 3. The petitioners are, therefore, at liberty to move the competent authority immediately for grant of parole. The competent authority is directed to pass order immediately thereupon 2 preferably within a day by giving reasons. 4. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. Jail Authorities be informed immediately. JUDGE. JUDGE halwai.