HIGH COURTOF<^H^^TISGARHATBILASPUR WRITPETITION (227) N0.374072011 PETITIOENRS VERSUS RESPONDENTS 7. ;ffl" .8. Ashok Kumar. Gupta, aged aboyt 48 years,'S/o Shrj Ramjbool ©upta,I?/o Village I^eparfarai, T^ District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh , , • De'fendantNo.:4. Mahesh Kurriar, aged about 37 years S/o ,Shri Chuni: I.al Singh, R/o Jalpafrai , Nagar, Marwadi Line, Btlaspur,, : District .; . Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh: . ,. ' : PLAINTIFF NQ. 1 Manish Gupta, aged about 30, years, S/o Shri Narayan Prasad Gupfa, R/o Vikas .Nagar, Bilaspur; Tahsil arid District Bilaspur, Chhatttsgarh; ': PLAIN'raFFNO. 2. Bharat Lal Gupta, aged aboyt 57 years, S/p Shri'RaEnjhoql Gupta,;'. ..- DEFENDANTNQ. l Arjyn Lal,' aged albout 58 .years, S/o ;RamjhQ61Gupta,l.':li:..^., : .. ' . ':; ; DESFENBANT NQ. 2. Susheel, aged about 51 years;S/b 'Shi-i RamjhooI.Gupta, : . ;' . DEF'ENDNT'NO:.3. • Respondents No; 3 fo 5 all. ai^.R/o Village -' Peepartarai, Tsihsil" Kota, Districf Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Kishore Gupfa, aged aboyt 35 years,; S/Q Ramjhool Gupta, aged: about 35' years, R/6 ..Hatri - Chowkr Juna BaaspurfC.G.). ^.' .' 1'1. .•1. < DEFENDNTNQ. 5. Smt. Geeta Devi, W/o .Eate Shri. Ramjhool Gupta, aged aboyf 67 years, R/6; Hafri Chowk,^ Jnna Bilaspur .:(G-G-)--:'/^1:''^ DEKENDNTNQ. 6. Saajeev Oupta, aged abciut 33 years, -S/p Late Shri^Ramjhpol Oupta, R/a Hafri ' Ghowk,^:, Jurta • /Bilaspur, CMtiattisgarh. - ',,' , ^ , : .,:.; DEFENDNT.N13. 7. Rajkuniar Gupta, aged ;aboyt ; 50 yeai-s, S/.o Shri.Ramjhool^Crypta, R/o Hatri Cft6wk,.JunaBilaspyr (C.G.); DEFENHNT'NQ. &. m ffi ' i'^-v 10. . Smt. Meena Deyi, aged about 50 years W/o .Mahendra Gupta, R/o. Julna Bilaspur, : Hantri; Chowk Bllaspur, Tahsil land Bistrict Bilaspur, Chhaftisgarh. •-.:..'; • , DEFENDNTNO. 9. WRIT UNDERARTIGLE227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB iHon'ble Mr, T.P.Shanna, J.) Present:- Shri Kishoi-e Bhaduri, Advocate with SHri Pawan KesUarwani, 'Advocate.fbrthepetitioner. . : Respoiidentsnot noticed. , , . . - ORAL-QRDER (Passedbn r4/0?^201t) 1, By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India petitioner has challenged the legalityandproprietyofthebrderdated 7/5/2011 passed by First Additional Distriet Judge Bilasp^r, District Bilaspur . (C.G.)in ExecutionCaSeNo,25-A/20Q8. " 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach before the AppGllate/Revisional;Foru^ 3.' Prayer allowed.'^;'1'''1 ;,•.;'..!;:,' .;., : ^.- •:,,i '' , ;/. :". ~:. /•' 4. Consequenfly, petitionjs dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. . 5. Certified copy bf the order impugned be. returned to •the petitioner after duly submissipn.Qfphofosttatedcopyofsame. ,No. order as td costs. : .' - • . ^— —— — : - ^--u^ V Sd/- i T.Ri Sharma ^judge •^\y ^ ^l