IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34255 of 2010 RAJENDRA BIND Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 09.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Admittedly, police after due investigation found the case untrue and, accordingly, submitted final form but learned C.J.M. took the cognizance of the offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that there is enmity between the parties and I.O. after due investigation found the case false but learned C.J.M, only after considering the statement of the informant and other witnesses, took the cognizance and the learned Sessions Judge relying upon the aforesaid submissions, rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also points out that the doctor has also not found any sign of rape on the person of the informant. Considering the aforesaid submissions as well as materials available on record, petitioner, namely, Rajendra Bind, in the event of his arrest/surrender within thrity days from the date of communication of this order, shall be released on bail in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 89 of 2007 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Munger subject to 2 condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)