THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.22965 OF 2007 Dated 16th June, 2010 Between: D.Sumithra Reddy …Petitioner And M.R.Vijay Kumar and four others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri K.Jagadishwar Reddy for Sri A.Rajasekhar Reddy Counsel for respondents 1 to 3 : None appeared Counsel for respondents 4 and 5 : Sri O.Manohar Reddy The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondents 4 and 5 in threatening disconnection of power supply to the petitioner’s business premises bearing No.1-2-412/21/1 of Domalguda, Hyderabad as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, Sri K.Jagadishwar Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri A.Rajashekar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Sri O.Manohar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 4 and 5, submitted that the petitioner is a tenant in respect of one of eight mulgies and that she filed the writ petition in respect of the service connection pertaining to the mulgi in her occupation. He further stated that after the filing of this writ petition, the petitioner vacated the premises and the owner has paid the arrears in respect of all the service connections including the service connection, which was being used by the petitioner and that at the request of the owner, the respondents have disconnected seven out of eight service connections keeping one service connection alive. Having regard to the above submissions, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, interim order dated 01.11.2007 is vacated. WPMP No.29922 of 2007 and WVMP No.3527 of 2009 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 16th June, 2010 vrn