1 7 S.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION No. 250/2007 [DR.HAMENDRA RAJVANSHY VS. SHRI R.K.MEENA & ORS.] Dated : 15.02.2008 HON'BLE MR. MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, J. Mr.A.K.Rajvanshi for the petitioner. Mr.S.N.Tiwari Dy.G.A. for the respondent. ***** Pursuant to the notice of contempt petition, respondents have filed reply showing that substantial compliance of the judgment has already been made and in that respect even the petitioner was given promotion vide order dated 31.12.2007 and Annex.R/4. Perusal of the reply shows that substantial compliance of the judgment has been made. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the judgment of this Court has complied with substantially but the only issue regarding grant of actual benefit of arrears of the promoted post from the arrears of benefit of the promotional post. I have considered the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the judgment. Since a specific direction has not been given in the judgment for grant of benefit of the arrears on the day of promotion, however, if the petitioner has any grievance in that regard, he would be at liberty to make a 2 representation to the respondents and approach before the appropriate form, if he is aggrieved but so far as present matter is concerned, since substantial compliance has already been made, the contempt petition is dismissed and notices are discharged. (MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI), J. mamta