1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 2479/2007 Rajaram Laxman Kedar and others ...vs... Vitthal Baliram Bhegokar and others -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 11 th March, 2008 1. Heard Mr. Khapre, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The main grievance of the petitioners seems to be that their revision (Annexure-9) filed before the Divisional Commissioner, Amravati challenging the order dated 24.07.2006 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer is not being disposed of. It is also not disputed that now the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal is reestablished at Nagpur and the petitioners' revision mentioned above will have to be transferred to the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Nagpur. Mr. Khapre further submitted that the Presiding Officer is appointed by the Government, however, he is not sure whether the charge is taken or not. 2 3. In the facts and circumstances mentioned above, I am of the opinion that the petition can be disposed of by passing the following order:- (i) The Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Nagpur is directed to hear and dispose of petitioners' revision at Annexure-9 to the petition as expeditiously as possible and in any event within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order or from the date on which concerned Presiding Officer assumes the charge, as the case may be. (ii) The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. JUDGE kahale