WP(C) 4968/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. I.H. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. N. Goswami, learned Standing Counsel, ASEB. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a directio n to the respondents to pay him full pay and allowances for the period of suspen sion from 10.5.07 to November, 2010. Considering the nature of the grievance rai sed and as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed off at the motion stage itself. The petitioner was placed under suspension by order dated 17.5.2007 pend ing drawal of departmental enquiry. In the departmental enquiry concluded on 6.1 2.2010, the petitioner was imposed with the penalty of stoppage of increments fo r two years. While Mr. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after finalization of the departmental enquiry, the petitioner is entitled to get regu larization of his period of suspension with full pay and allowances, Mr. Goswami , learned Standing Counsel, ASEB submits that since the suspension was not unjus tified and the petitioner was imposed with the aforesaid penalty pursuant to a d epartmental enquiry, the petitioner is not entitled to receive anything else tha n what was paid to him during the period of suspension as subsistence allowance. The order dated 6.12.2010 (Annexure-B) by which the petitioner was impos ed with the penalty of stoppage of increments and was reinstated in service, doe s not speak of anything about the period of suspension which is normally require d to be indicated in such matters. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of directing the au thority which has passed the order dated 6.12.2010 (Annexure-B) to pass and orde r regarding the period of suspension as to whether the petitioner would be entit led to full pay and allowances or not. Let the appropriate order be passed as expeditiously as possible, prefer ably within one month. Whatever may be the outcome of the order to be passed in terms of this order, same may be communicated to the petitioner. With the above directions and observations, the writ petition stands dis posed of, without however, any order as to costs.