HIGH COIIRT OF CHHATTISGARJI AT BILASPim Yt'ntPetition(S)No.S27of2(%{a! PETITIONERS 1 4. 6. s. RESPO^'DENTS : 1, 2. Tulsi Ram Dhikkode, S/o Shri Chamu Ram Cfahidoide aged about 53 years, Headmaster, Govt. Primary School, Tendiia, Block Abhanpiir, District Raipur (CG). Smt. G. Ransingh W/o Shri Surendra Ransm^i Age about 50 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Adharinavagaon Distt. Dhamtari (CG). Tribhuwan Lal Sarva S/o Shri Jeevan Lal Sarva, age about 55 years, Asstt. Teacher, ^Govt. Primary School, Piparchhedi (D), Distt Dhamtari (CG). Surya Lal Sahu S/o Shri Nur Singh Sahu, age about 55 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Fusera, Block Kurod, Distt. Dhamtari (CG). Brijlal Tandan, S/o Shri Mehatani Ram Tandan Age about 55 years, Headmaster Govt. Primary School Mudpar, Distt. Dhaiitari (CG). Purushottam Singh Chouhan S/'o Shri Jeevan Sin^i Chouhan Age about 55 years, Assistaiit Teacher, Go"t. Primary School, Pachari, Block Tilda, Distt. Raipur (CG). Diikalha Ram Verma, S/o Shri Bhagela Ram Venna, Age about 55 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Kusmi, Block Palari, D'stt. Raipur (CG). Soman Lal Sahu, S/o Shri Mehataru Ram Sahu, age about 55 years, Asstt. Teacher, Go'vt. Middle School, Sindhorikala Block Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (CG). VERSUS State Govenmient ofClihattisgarh, tlirough Secretary, Tribal & Education Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). District Education Officer, Distt. Raipur/Dhamtari (CG). i^RTT PETITION IJNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'Ue Mr. Satish K. Asmhotrt 3.) Present : Shri Somkant Venna, Advocate for the petitioneT!? Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents. Q1RAJ..ORDER >flT (Passed on diis 12m ofMarch, 20TO) 1. Learaed counsel appearing for the petitioaers subniits that the petitioners do not want to coiitest the matter on merit. However, the petitionere pray for liberty to make representation before the authorities concemed to consider the case m accordance with law, on its own merit, expeditiously, to which leamed counsel appearing for the State has no objection. 2. It is ordered accordingly. 3. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above stated liberty. No order as to costs. __ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge