IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13555 of 2009 1. DEVENDRA SAHNI,son of late Manik Sahni 2. Shambhu Sahni,son of Sri Devendra Sahni 3. Shoshan Sahni,son of late Manik Sahni 4. Kailu Sahni,son of late Manik Sahni 5. Savitri Devi,wife of late Anup Sahni All residents of village-Babhangama (Pahsara),P.S.-Naokothi,District-Begusarai. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.13973 of 2009 1. BIKAS SAHNI 2. Rakesh Sahni Both are sons of Devendra Sahni, all residents of village-Babhangama (Pahsara),P.S.-Naokothi,District-Begusarai. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 27-04-2009 As both these cases arise of the same police station case number, they are heard together. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is land dispute in between the parties and no case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (hereinafter referred to as `the S.C. & S.T Act’ for the sake of brevity) is made out. But I fail to understand how the case under the S.C. & S.T. Act is not made out while there is clear allegation about making assertion regarding nakedding the informant and abusing in the name of his caste. So, I find that these anticipatory bail petitions are not maintainable. Accordingly, both these petitions are rejected. However, if the allegations are not so serious, that can be raised in the court where the case is pending after surrender, which shall be decided on the same day without being prejudiced by this rejection order. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )