1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 96/2007 Vilas Dadarao Kamble & 2 Ors. ..vs.. State of Maharashtra, thr. P.S.O. Kharangana -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 25 th June, 2008 1. Heard Mr. Khare, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. Adgokar, learned A.P.P. for the non applicant. 2. The learned Ad hoc District & Sessions Judge-1, Wardha rejected the applicants' application at Exh.-24 filed under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for discharge and, therefore, the present revision is filed. 3. The applicants are charged for an offnence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code in pursuance of the complaint filed by father of the deceased. At the time of issuance of process under Section 302 of the I.P.C. the learned Magistrate examined in all 11 witnesses. 2 4. I have gone through the statement of PW4 Murlidhar Chaudhari which is annexed at Page No. 45. After perusal of the statement, I am satisfied that there are sufficient grounds to proceed against the present applicant/accused. For the purpose of framing the charge, strong suspicion is sufficient and, therefore, I am of the view that no case is made out for discharge. The learned Sessions Judge has taken correct view of the matter. I find no reason to interfere in the same in exercise of my jurisdiction under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The revision is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE kahale