IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH APPLICANT: sS-0" ^ ^ >f>>" NON APPLICANTS: M.C.C.N0.6t(f OF 2006 n ^ Kuber Grih Nirman Sahkari ..•^&fy Samit^Maryadit.Rohinipiiram, J.^.y Raipur, Distt Raipur (CG) (A ^y^d'?'^' Registered Co-operative ^'.•'•'" Society bearing registration No. ^' DR/RPR/46/80-81) through - its Chairman. - VERSUS - Smt. Murti Devi Singraul, Wife of Shri Ghana Ram Singraul, Aged about 49 years, C/o S. R. Verma R/i C- 259, Rohinipuram, Raipur, Distt Raipur (CG) APPLICATION FOR RECALL OF ORDER DATED 23.08.2006 AND FOR RESTORATION OF CIVIL REVISION N0. 08/2006; KUBER GRIH NIRMAN SAHAKARI SAMITY V/S. SMT. MURLIDEVI XI-HC-78 *11*<<>11 Sh*Trai 3q'^TRrT?PT, ®iflt1'IS,(aK'lluy ^,C-C.No, 64-1/^P^ •/w^ aoo an^rirgqi'(t^i^^F) 3n^r?iTfq:iNi (raT3n^Ti»)Kicb ?OTWtrf?cT3TI^T qiNf<i41-i tiii<iTfftetd'<Ri'hii< ^sri^Tsn^r 05.01.2007 Shn H.S. Patel, None for fhe respoadent[ Heard. This application (M.C.C), restoration of Civil Revision under Section 115 of the Codl is supported by affidavit ofthe| This inatter was disinis fhe Members of fhe CTsht fheinselves froiu the Court agauist fhe action of the State| as Law Officers ofthe State. Leamed counsel for hundred cases were disaussedl Division Bench of fhis Courf; passing a detailed order datei? about aU fhe cases, which w{ certaia conditions. His niay also be given to this case\ The prayer appears to b| The order of Division perused. For fhe reasons stated passed by fhe Division counsel |for the applicant. }. No. 641/2006) has beeii filed for fto. 08/2006, which was a revision of Civil Procedure. This application counsel. tsed in defaiilt on 23.8.2006, when littisgarh Higfi Court Bar absented. Iproceedings as a mark of protest Govermnent in appoiatmg outsiders PIC applicaat subinits fhat about iu default on the said date and fhe (;, headed by The Chief Justice, by ^ 6th October, 2006, restored ahaost •re dismissed by the said Bench^on is that the similar treatm.ent submtission )^ genunie. B^nch passed ia M.C.C. No. 495/2006 tn fhe order dated 6th October, 2006 Bei|ich ia M.C.C. No. 495/2006, this XI-HC-78 *lIHCfTSh*1|ch 3^ •<11<111!1<<, 3^^'!?, RltfllUy ; J^-^C.^o. 64-l/2^t:%t Wi,: 10 •^ Sii^i racn (>{c|i^ii)<ys() sTterqirfeNT lW3I1^T»l*< wnwdftirsn^r -2. application is allowed on fhc have been inentioned in tfae The dmmissed revteion original niimber on the reasoi^ SS^ M-c.c..&t<wri cttl'4T<1ei1-'t *1lH<TiTl' ^T'fe1^' ^-^tK ^iSlf^ITSn^T same tenns aad conditions, wliicli afbresaid order. 08/2006 shall be restored to its s stated in fhe order. h^- ° 1 Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge