^ Petltioner it Petition (0 No. 690 of 200S Jeewan lat Sahu, S/o. Lats Sahu, Age about 55 years, R/o. Vii Datranga, Tahsii & Dist. Raipur (CG). laae State iv. of Deveiopment, D.K.S. Bhavan, Rai 2. District Coilector, Ralpur (CG). 3) Thehesiidar, Raipur (CG). 4) Sarpanch-Smt. Girija Bai, Qram Panchayat Vitiage Datranga, Tahsil & Dist. Rais OA'rit Petition under Articfe 226 of Constitution of india) h Hon'bie r. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Ms. Renu Kochar, counsei for the petitioner. Mr. Vlnay Harit, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ^»- i'Passed on this 11 day of Deceniber 200 Sy this petition, the petitioner seeks the foilowing reliefs. "1. That the Hon'ble Court may piease be ordered to gi-< suitabSe direction to respondsnt for not taken possession over the petitioner fank vi/hich is Rajaram Manda! Taiab village Datrenga, Tehsif & District Raipur (CG) and not to 2. Any other reiief order direction which .may b< deemed fit may kindly b& given in the interest ofjustice." 2) . Renu Kochar, learned counsei appearing for ths petitioner submits that the oetitioner is a titie hoider and ownsr of the tank constructed on the lanc! bearing Khasra No. 239 area about 0.938, situated at vilSage District. Raipur, which has been leased out by smlf1 -2- Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Datrenga to other persons for fisheries. Learned counsei further submits that since the tank in auestlon is under the owner-ship of the petitionsr, the same cannot be ieased out to other persons. The Gram Panchavat has no authoritv to do the same. 3) Be that as it may, since ths question involved herein is the jurisdictlon off:he Gram Panchayat on alieged ov/nership of the petitioner of the tank in question, the same cannot be decided on the basis of documents p invesUgaiion and examination of the entlre nerein. Thus, this petition deseroes to be dismisssd as not maintainable. 4) Accordjngly, the petition is dismissed as nct maintainabie. However, Siberty is raserved to the petitioner to take recourse to jurisdictionai competent.court for appropriate relief. The petitioner is further at iiberty to ssek decision on the complaint aitegediy fi!ed ^-^^ s^% ^w.. iiiu, •^S^SfflSS^aSSSVSV^S^^'^W^.^SSSff^S^SSK^