c,•i'yo ^•) ^ IN THE mGH COURT OF JUDICATUSE AT BELASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. ^,3^3 /2004 PETITIONER Janpad Panchayat, Wadrufaagar through its President ofStanding Committee ofEducation Shri Harish Chandra Gupta S/o Shri Mdiavir Prasad Gupta, aged 45 years, R/o Viilage & Post Banlagi, Tahsil Wadnifnagar, District Surguja (C.G.) RESPONDENTS -VERSUS- 1. .<^.:^"" \ ^y. ^A..^' \^"' 2. 3. State ofChhattisgarh through Secretary, Panchayat & Rura! Development Department, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Collector, Surguja at Ambikapur(C.G.) ChiefExecutive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Surguja at Ambikapur (C.G.) ChiefExecutive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Wadrufnagar, District Surguja WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRJT. ORDERS OR DIRECTION. 4. L_^ XI-HC-22 3T^RFT'^T f^ri^^ni^T ^RW^ii^a + ® •s^r -^IHM^, ^^i^ ^^^s< TST^OA^ "^ 200 'RTRcfIT5b^ilcb •^^s' an^T^nw^f^r chHld^4 t:n^Tf'? 'fe^l' <Pn^i< i7 STf^FT ^TT^T D.B.; Hosi. Slm FaMiruddm, A; & Hoii. V.K. SIirivastava, 12-01-2005 .C.J. ,r: i Snri I.S. Sahu for the p^ Shri Prashaiit. Mishi'aJ ao. 1 & 2. Heaixl. t.1tiioner. AcldL A.G., for reQpondente This. matter was .tagged fne velidiw' or othenvise of d Rzilcs, 2004 havc bccii chall.ci- wiUi the batch of cases where phhettisg^rh PaTlchay^t Shala Saiiivicla ShikQliak (Appoiiitnt.eiit & Conditions of Seivice) [gc.d, Couiisel fbr the petitton^r submlis that the petitioner has not chaiienged the vauditv of the aforcsaid Kuies. rie ^l^o siihmits th^t the TDster be.eu followed aiid' the pe re^ervatioB. ro^ter (Armexure-P pi'escribefl m Rtile 6 h^s not ^.tioner has challenged the f7) to tlie effect tliat it is not. ni confoiTaitv witli fiie Rule 6, Counsei for tiie peti|iouer contended tiiat the petitioner h^id si3hm1tted e rep| tlie Collector, which has uot bel resenration (Annexiire-P/8) to ?.n clecided so iai\ Sliri Pra^liajit Mi^hra, ^dclL A,G,, on the othcr. haj^id submits that fh.e permoner atresh witlim seveii ciavs befoii Zil^ PsTichavar, wnicn wi11 he c own inerite at tlie eQLi'Me^t. aiay a represenmtioii the Cliief Executive Officer, pnsiderer] and fiecided on its ['qt^ ^Ra^ XI-HC-22 s^! -s^t ^Ni<ri<4. ^y4i'»,rs«ti^i< 3TT^?r xnra? 37T^T^T f^iwsn^T ^RW^I + ijo^ ^K ^i^di •g^qj^*—•——*——••"•"'•••'•'^^p^ 200 ^^T"""""""""""" In view of the above, co^iusel for the petitioner wante to withdraw thm petitioii wit.h |iberhr to file a represeiitation ;aii'^:sh belbi1e 'llie Chit?i Exf?cLi'tN Having thus considered merits of the case, m oar op|iiioii. it is dii'ected tliat the petitioner ni^ tlle a represent^.tioii afresh befbre the Chief Execiitive Officer,. Zila Pancha1 ^ucli represeutadou beiiig cousidered and decided ou its cf law as eariy a.s'possfble prefera'1 date of receipt of tlie represent^ ^ still sub^ists, the petitioncr m;^ aiider Uie IHW, Accordiiigly, tliis petiti(] witlidrawn with t]ie libertv aibrdsaid. Cousequeiitly, M.W.P. di3p03€cl Of, CerUIfcd c^)py as per rult1 ^^ chH{<rl^1Ti Hl^<A* ^ fe^ <E^^t< '^3rf^R'%^?r e 0£lx;er< Zila PaiK'hayat. md wifhout entermg intD ffae ^at within seven clays. and 011 |filed, tlic saiiie sliall be wu merits m accordaiice witli )ly wittim Iwo weeks from tlie ition. In case, ony grievaiice w avail tlie renieclY available 'n . stands disposed of as No.2958/04 also stajids Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice Sd/- V.K. Shrivastava Judge ['Tt^ ^fo^