IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN TUESDAY, THE 14TH JUNE 2011 / 24TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 4060 of 2011(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHEELA, D/O.ABUSA BEEVI, SHIJIN MANZIL, AGED 37 YEARS, KANNAMCODE, VENJARAMOOD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 607. BY ADV. SRI.SREEKANTH S.NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, COLLECTORATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 501. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, VENJARAMOOD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 607. 3. SREEDHARAN, S/O.CHATTAN, AGED 42 YEARS, THADATHARIKATHU VEEDU, KANNAMCODU, VENJARAMOOD.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 607. ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B FOR R2 SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH FOR R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: dmb WP(C).No. 4060 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- P1:- COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 17.01.2011 IN S1-90440/2007 P2:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.S.NO.602/2004 DATED 26.09.2009 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C)No. 4060 OF 2011 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T The prayer in this writ petition is for a direction to the first respondent to issue a copy of the order passed by him on the application submitted by the second respondent and to stay the implementation of that order for a period of two months so as to enable the petitioner to challenge that order in appropriate proceedings. When the writ petition came up for hearing on 08.02.2011, I directed that if pursuant to Ext.P1 notice, the Additional District Magistrate, Thiruvananthapuram has passed an order in exercise of the power conferred on him under section 16 of the Indian Telegraph Act, a copy thereof shall be furnished to the petitioner and that if orders have already been passed, the Kerala State Electricity Board shall await further orders of this Court before providing electricity supply to the third respondent. When the writ petition came up for hearing today, the learned counsel on both sides submitted that till date the first respondent has not passed orders pursuant to Ext.P1. W.P.(C)No. 4060 OF 2011 2 In such circumstances, the reliefs prayed for by the petitioner cannot be granted. The writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE dmb