IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINRY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 147 OF 2008 M/s. Jethmal Manrupji & Co. ... Plaintiffs. Versus Sheela Chandrakant Karani ... Defendant. Mr. Ramesh Jain for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Pradeep Jain for the Defendant. CORAM : A.A. SAYED, J. DATE : JUNE 24, 2009. P.C. 1. By consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, the suit itself is taken up on board. The List of the Documents (two documents) tendered on behalf of the defendants is taken on record and marked “A” collectively. 2. The learned Counsel for the parties have tendered the Consent Terms signed by the parties and their respective Counsel. The plaintiff and the defendant are also present in Court. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. 3. The suit is decreed in terms of the consent terms. 4. Refund of court fees as per rules. [A.A.SAYED, J.] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINRY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 32 OF 2009 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 147 OF 2008 M/s. Jethmal Manrupji & Co. ... Plaintiffs. Versus Sheela Chandrakant Karani ... Defendant. Mr. Ramesh Jain for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Pradeep Jain for the Defendant. CORAM : A.A. SAYED, J. DATE : JUNE 24, 2009. P.C. 1. In view of disposal of the suit itself, nothing survives in the Summons for Judgment. The Summons for Judgment to stand disposed of. [A.A.SAYED, J.]