IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Civil Writ Petition No.354 of 2004 with CWP No. 355 of 2004 Date of decision: 28.2.2007. CWPNo.354 of 2004 Smt. Barfu Devi Vs. L. A. C. and others. CWP No.355 of 2004 Julffu Devi Vs. L. A. C. and others Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Dev Darshan Sud,J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner(s): Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr.Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Rajan Dewan, Addl. A.G.for respondent No.3. Dev Darshan Sud,J(oral) Both these writ petitions are being disposed of by a common order. Petitioners seek directions to the respondents to decide the applications moved by them under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. When these writ petition were taken up for hearing today, it was not disputed before me that the points of law and facts involved in these petitions are identical with those in CWP Nos. 183 of 2001, 184 of 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 2001, 1206 of 2002 and 1213 of 2002, which have been decided on 18.12.2006. Both these writ petition shall abide by the directions as given in CWP Nos. 183 of 2001, 184 of 2001, 1206 of 2002 and 1213 of 2002, decided on 18.12.2006. Both the writ petitions are disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. February 28, 2007 (Dev Darshan Sud) (ss) Judge