HIGH SQURT OF CHHATTISG‘ARH: ELASPUR Writ Pet§iion (S) No 6474vof 2008 ' 1 i 1 I i l ‘ \ r l r r \ Peiitioner Dwanka Prasad Suryawanshx aged “2 yea¥s son of Late Praga Ram Suryawanshn worKmg as qumor Assistant (suspended; at Dictrsct Qffice State CM! Supphes Cos’poratlon, Janjgu' D:s+“:bf Janggir-Chawpa, m3 Ja habhatha Mawdw Chowk BJaspm D;stnc£ ‘ 5;!a5pur (CG) Versus 1). CG State CivEi SuppEies corporation Limited; . Raipur thmugh the Managmg Director Eai Ashram Campus Kucrery Chowk Raxpuri _, (CG) f2} The Managing Erector CG State CM! v ; 1 Supplies Corporatmn Lir’nted Ba! Ashram Can‘pus Kucr‘ery Chgwk Raipur (GG) (Writ Petition under Artrcie 226 of Constitution of Indra) . $8. Hon hie Mr. Eatish K. ixgmhotnJr l Présent: Mr. RK. KeshahrraniAdVocata forthe'petitioner. ‘ Mr V‘R. T3wari, Advocate forlthe resgiorrdents. Re p 1 r ’ ‘ / GRAL ORDER l r L r rPassed o1 {hrs 18h day of March 2009) i 3 With the conse'rt of learned counse! ror bo’rh tne parties the rratter rs I ’ ' heard finany r 2) l W Kesharwam !earned counsei appearing for the petmoner Seeks a- dhectrorr that durmg peraciency of the depanmentai enqulry the suspensron order dared 2S 9‘2005 (Annexure P/o) may be quashed as there rs no progress m :he depertmenrai enquiry and the petmoner Is suffering on account of we SUSpersibi’l ordef y; 3) J Mr V R Trwar: Eeamed counse§ appearing for the responoehts submits iraf the departmental enquiry pending against the petitioner shaii be oompieted Within a period of two ironths ,4) i in View of the dear and categorical statement made by learned counsel V appearing for me respondents nothing survwes in the matter for adiudication 5) r Accordingly, this petition is dismissed i Consequenty, lA N02 also stands dismissed 4!‘......‘‘ , l Sd/- l. i _ I SatishK Agnihotri rah Judge I 2, "/— —~/ ‘ ‘ ‘ —