73# $- *INTIIEHIGHCOURToFDELHIATNEwDELHI + w.P.(cRL) I443l20Il JAIDEEP GUPTA AND ORS ""' Petitioner Through: \4r. C.M. Verma and \zlr' Ajit Kumar Jain, Advocate with Petitioners in person. VEfSUS TI{E, STATE, NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: IVIr. Saleem Ahmed, Additional Standing Counsel with SI Rattan Kumar, PS Shalimar Bagh. Mr. Sunil Mittal, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 with ResPondent No. 2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER 19.10.201L Crl. M.A. NO. 12393/2011 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions' W.P. (Crl.) 144312011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 747/2002 under Sections 4g8N406l34IPC registered at Shalimar Bagh, Delhi' The CornplainanVRespondent No. 2 Ms. Kanta Gupta is present in pcrson and is identified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and W.P.(CRL) 1443/2011 Page 1 of 3 ,h Signing Date:05.09.2024 17:03:50 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified Itespondent No.2/Cornplainant have entered into a Comprornise. In terms of the settlement, mamiage between the Petitioner No. I and Respondent No. 2/Complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent on lTth Septernber,2011. As full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2,the Petitioner No. t has to pay T15 lakhs out of which T12 lakhs have already been paid to her and {3 lakhs have been paid to her today vide Demand Draft No. 048972 dated, 14th October, 2011 drawn on I{DFC Bank. It has been fuither agreed upon by the parties that the amount of Rs. 1 lakh along with the interest that has accrued thereon deposited by the Petitioner No. 1 at the tirne of grant of bail before the leamed Trial Court will be released to Respondent No. 2 and the articles which have been recovered will remain with Petitioner No. 1. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want .to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful pu{pose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create fuither acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings Page 2 of 3 w.P.(cRL) 1443/2011 _) I pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 74712002 under Sections 498N406134 IPC registered at Shalimar Bagh, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby cluashed. It is further directed that the amount of Rs. 1 lakh along with the interest that has accmed thereon deposited by Petitioner No. 1 be released to Respondent No. 2lComplainant. The superdarinama of Respondent No' 2 with regard to the articles taken by her in her possession is also discharged. Parlies have signed this order sheet in acknowledgrnent of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. wlrL . MUKTA GUPTA, J. ocToBER 19, 20ll 'vn' ^ , 2?-, ),46P uv N^"J'\1 -.,,' GL4 \ .4";Na/.)S,Bxr,." tr'P'(cRL) 144s/2011 "^/ ou^*'' V-- tl) ./( u'flvn'ffit Doth *qr,prr44re k o,.^+a awpt< Page 3 of 3 fl.< c viscJ Dn----l z. Lqk<a |/-qr4.t4A 5 ,'a*-rg, f16 - L-.^1; Nrd' 2-. ffi,vl q^ft, R*Ft,