,'\ ,'2-- 26 & 27. * (1) + # (2) + # % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP( Crl. )No. 934/2006. M/s Deepak Resorts & Hotels Pvt. Ltd & Ors. Petitioners Mr. S.K. Sharma, Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Mr. Dhruv Kumra, Mr. Mayank and Mr. Anoop, Advs. Through Versus The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr. Respondents Mr. Rajat Katyal, Adv. for the State. Mr. Deepak Dhingra and Mr. Through Smt. Anjali Sehgal Through Versus Kamlesh Anand, Advs. for respondent no.2 along with Mrs. Anjali Sehgal, respondent no.2. lnspr. Sushil Kumar, EOW, Crime. WP(Cri.)No.l517/2007 Petitioner Mr. Deepak Dhingra and Mr. Kamlesh Anand, Advs. along with Mrs. Anjali Sehgal, petitioner in person. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr. Respondents Through CORAM: Mr. Rajat Katyal, Adv. for the State. Mr. S.K. Sharma, Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Mr. Dhruv Kumra, Mr. Mayank and Mr.Anoop,Advs.forrespondent no.2. lnspr. Sushil Kumar, EOW, Crime. ORDER 06.04.2009 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified '-....____.// \ ,' '-.:.....-/ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the Judgment should be reported in the Digest? G.S. 5/STAN/, J. (ORAL): ,,A, 1. Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.131/2006 under Sections 447/451/34 of the I PC, Police Station Kapashera, New Delhi, in WP(Cri.)No.934/2006; and FIR No.187 /06 under Sections 380/411 of the I PC, Police Station Kapashera in WP(Cri.)No.1517 /2007. 2. In WP(Cri.)No.934/2006 an FIR being No.131/2006 was lodged by respondent no.2 M/s Alaknanda Properties Pvt. Ltd. through its Director Mrs. Anjali Sehgal. In WP(Cri.)No.1517/2007, an FIR being No.187/06 was registered by Deepak Resorts & Hotels Pvt. Ltd. 3. After some hearing, the parties have agreed that the FIR filed, inter se, against each other be quashed in view of the fact that a civil litigation in respect of the rights of parties with regard to the land in question is pending. 4. Mrs. Anjali Sehgal, respondent no.2 in WP(Cri.)No.934/2006 is present in Court and submits that she does not wish to press the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom against Deepak Resorts & Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Similarly, Mr. S.K. Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no.2 in WP(Cri.)No.1517 /2007, submits that he has instructions not to press the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioner. \3 ;-. ' --.....______., \) 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Taking into consideration the statement made by Mrs. Anjali Sehgal, respondent no.2 in WP(Cri.}No.934/2006 and the statement made by Mr. S.K. Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no.2 in WP(Cri.}No.1517 /2007 as well as keeping in view the fact that a civil litigation in respect of the rights of parties with regard to land in question is pending, accordingly, FIR No.131/2006 under Sections 447/451/34 of the I PC, Police Station Kapashera, New Delhi, in WP(Cri.)No.934/2009, and FIR No.187 /06 under Sections 380/411 of the IPC, Police Station Kapashera in WP(Cri.)No.1517 /2007, and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. 6. Petition stands disposed of. 7. Dasti. J SISTANI, . G. . April 06, 2009 'msr' J /I , ,-J.J' " , §r!J<.V,1 •,i.n .. 'if.,i!iP_,.'!il!,c uv •• ·:..;;o .. •'·"·;v;o.e,c,:· -- - ----1---