HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S : H J. .B. ON’BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI WRIT PETITION g3; rigggg§ ofzqgg ‘ PETITIONER Tularam Gupta S/o C.R*Gupta, Astt. Teacher-RSSamkera, Tamnax The.- Gharghoda, Distt, Raigarh (C,G,) VERSUS : .1, Secretary, through Chhattisgarh Schooi Education department, D.K.Bhawan, Raipur (0G,) ,2: Coliecton thrdugh Sc/St 8L Welfare department Rajgarh (C.G.) RESPONDENTS Present: None appears for tha petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on 16m March 2007) The petitionera while working as Assietaxit Teacher at Primmy School Samkera; Block. Tamnara bistrict Raigarh, was transferred to Prim 4‘L ary‘Sehool Sa1kheta, on the same terms and conditions vide impugned order dated 31,07,200! (Aimexure Ail ), The Madhya Pradesh Adminisirative Tribunal at Raipur vide interim order dated 07,1 1...2001 directed to maintain status quo in regard to the position of the petitioner as was prevailing on 15.10200}, -By virtue of the interim order the petitioner is eontinuing at the original mace ofposting. /rr / K, D). B¢ that as it may, with the passage of time this petition has bacomg i11§uctuous a< neriod 0f tramfer is not annlmable forever At thm pmnt of tune there xs no mmstlon to examme the vahduty of thc transfer ordar Howevcr the mspondanis am at hberty to paw approonate ordgr kéaepmg m Vlew the pubhc interest and admxmstrative exwency, w1thout msxstmg on comphance ofthe unpugned transfér order: It is well settled principle of law that transfer is an menient of servxce and 1t ls for the empioyer to cieetde as to where a pamcular offcer/employee be posted keepmg m mew pubhc mterest as well e3 admlmstrauve emgencv This Court has Minted Jumdletton to intetfere an the transfer matter and tins Coutt call mterfere onlv 1n the case of proved malaiide, non- eompetence of authonty passing the transfer order and transfer order not being it: coaformity with the mics and reguiations, In View of the aboves this petition stands digposed of, No order as to costs. “‘4 Sd/- , t SanshK Agmhotri i § Judge ‘