AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.650 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8826 OF 2004 Arti Durgaram Gavandi. ... Applicant Vs. Managing Director, Usha Ispat Limited & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. V.M. Parkar i/b Mr. Mayuresh Nagale for the applicant. Mr. A.V. Bukhari i/b Mr. B.V. Bukhari for the Tata Metaliks Limited. CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ. DATED : 24TH FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C.:- 1. In this civil application, the applicants have prayed that Usha Ispat Limited be added as party respondent in the writ petition. 2. We must note that Usha Ispat Limited was a party to AJN 2 the petition. However, on 17/12/2006 at the instance of the applicants, Usha Ispat Limited was deleted. Learned counsel for the applicants made a statement that it was done under a misapprehension that the business of Usha Ispat Limited was taken over by the applicants. However, it has been disclosed in the review petition that the applicants have taken over only the secured assets of Usha Ispat Limited. In the circumstances, the applicants want to now add Usha Ispat Limited as party respondent in the writ petition. Hence, the civil application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment be carried out within three weeks from today. 3. Civil application is disposed of. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.]