»<E^*;;.; .'UB-.all.WAite^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATISGARH) W.P.N0302.0F 2002 LJ FETITIOPffiR ..•• ^' .•••"'^-f^*. ^^" ^^- v^' ..-<^~»'^' '..^'^:^ 4°^-:"'8l.^:'"Af' .•••'"o..^' Ai/y.' - /•-C^-<^1"- ^y5-^ Prasaiuia Thakre, S/o Shri K.R.Thakre Aged about 32 Years,R/o Rajendra Nagar, BUaspyr (Ctthattlsgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1 .The State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department of Geology & Mlning, Manta-alaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Ralpur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Dtrector, Geology &Mlnuig,i CUhattisgarh, Raipiu- (ChhatUsgarh). 3. CoUector. District Bflaspur (Chhattlsgarh) •pi11 r WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 /227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA: XI-HC-22 'C! 3D^r^iI R-ii* snisi ?b^)ich fif^n ». '. '3^ -'ii'iiei-a, oatwis, fajril'y^ WWWSOHItb.W^^Q:aso'2-l 5<i02- sn^r TBHW 'gfe 04-03-2002 Heard Shri P.P.Sahu, learn Sonjay Kumar A9r<»»al, learried Stote/Respondents. OR The petitioner has, in thjs order doted 31-01-2002 (Annexun 12-2001 (Annexure P - 5). |)etjtion sought for quashing of the failed to consider the fact tha* I noticeof 60 days to rectify the dij Act and ignoring th<it,the act o| contraryto the rulesand apparen-lj appeal on a new ground that theaf^ not in time which was not even th4 nor the wwf&..-s^'\__ <:bWfi'l41'< MWdl'? fvS iS^K^K '^•<npOT3n^[ ^ counsel for the petitioner and Shri (>eputy Adyocate ©eneral for the DER P-6) and the order dated 10- itioner in this petition is thot agoinst The main grievance of the pejl-i the order of the Collector (Re^ppndent No.3), the petitioner has preferred an d^peal before respol(dent Np.2, but the Respondent No.2 1-he respondent No.3 had not issued fauH' with fine as provided underthe )on<tent No.3 is <irbitrary dnd ^——-. -, .. . .- y^sesems to be biased in rejecting the lUcation for renewal of the lease was subject motter of shbw cuuse niotice [^^^'^t^ !t fel :r~.:^ l-^'sf XI-HG-22 ;S^ •<<wi<')';i, ®n1wis;f«l(«liy^< WHWI »t)rai ^T^I' sii^rqii K-»*ssi^s ^ ^^ ^1^1 3D^r^@iw(Tf?g c>ll<<iCT<l]l *111<'ll 4 feA <fa|^l< ^'siPgHSD^r <. Raju/Murthy Ih other. words, the grie wnce. of the petitioner is that the appellcint Cburt has n^ b^»inaa to dismiss the appeal without hea In the circumstcDices^sinc order (Annexure P -6) without h fout new ground agdinst the petitioner [(•ing him on that point. [the appellate authority has passed the ^aring the petitjoner on the point which is not mentioned In the show cautse notice, the order (Annexure P-6) connot be aistained. Accordingly, the petition i furt'herdirected to dispose of date of receipt of a copy of thi respondent No.2. With the above observart-J disposed of. allowed. The order (AnnexureP - 6) is <md quashed. Respondent No.2 is dirtjctedto hearthe petitioner pass the order afresh in accorda^ice with law. The Respondent No.Z is he appeal within one month from the order. Send a copy of this order to vns <md directions, this petition stands Parties are entitled for c^rtified copy ofthisorder • SdA ChiefJustice [^^feA ./y