c^ i r5°^ S!yR( !"°1 RFMIt§4 ^si'gsgLi^ vcn^in IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION fC) N0. ^ 9^~-S~ QF 2008 PETITIONER \::; .^AA-"> /;..-^--^-/ ^Mi^ K ^y AC"" . ^-.<•-... RESPONDENTS ,4..-'" v '/ Smt. Devanti Devi Wife of Late Chandra Bhal Rai, aged about 33 years, Resident of Katkona, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.). Present address C/o Shri Suresh Singh, Sushant Niketan, Rajiv Vihar, Rajkishore Nagar, Post S.E.C.L, Police Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS ^l. South Eastern Coalfields Limited, through: The Chairman cum Managing Director, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.). ^2. The Chief General Manager, S.E.C.L. Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.). ,3. TheSub Area Manager, S.E.C.L. Katkona Colliery, District Koriya (C.G.). ^ 4. Jhe Deputy Personnel Manager, S.E.C.L. Office of General Manager, Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA *:fc. -ff J<::1 !:) mOH CQUKEGFGHH^I'nSGARH AT BILASPUR WMT^aW©N:^/llNo.;6955::Qf'2008 -^-;:"'::'-';"'^ PETTHQNER : Snit. Devanti Devi. . VERSUS.:.. 1,: RESPONDENTS : South Eastera Coalfields Ltd. & Others. WRITPjETmCOT UNDERAimCI^226!GffiTHECX^STniJFION^^^^^ SBtH^l^ShiiSat^K.SSiCTatotri.*^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^, Preseiit: Slm P.Tiwari, Advocate&i-thej^petiitioner., Shri H.B.Agrawal, S^or Advoeate n^Shn Pankajj.Ag^wat, /| AdvocatefOTtherespondeHts. - ? ^ ORDER(ORAL) (Passedori28tndayof 3une,20l9) , 1. Leamedcounselappearing^thepetitionersutenntsthatfceln^^ the petitioner,Late ChandraBhal Rai,whowas engagediaeonstniclion . wc^^contractorwitfalhe respondaits-SECLwas not madepa%n^rt by the Tespondent-SECL. BiUs w^ raised afte taymg ms^ ^l|l;the? paynieHtstothewQrker^therespondffits-SECLeMnetete that a sumofRs. 1,71^)89^-waspayabletofhe petitioneras per iTOtiags dated 5^7.2004 (Annsxure P/I). However, no payment has Beai^^nade titiya.tetothepetitioher. ' 2. Shri Agrawal, leamed eminset appeanng ^ the respondents-^^ submits that fhe liuSBand pfIfae petitioner bad feiledto file a certificate with regard to paymeut ntade tottte labours and a complaint has also been made lythe labours cia 27.10.20Q4 (Annexure R/2). Aceocdmgly, •• the petitioner, after deatfa ofherhusband, '(dio'wasengagedia cftHti-act wcalc, was informedto submit the certifieate wifhFegardto {»ymeHtof wages to the labours \sy letterdated 19.12.2008 (ABnfixureR/4^aid 22.09.2008 (AnnexureP/7). The petitioner bas faikdfe s^^ required eertificste be&re settlement of dses <^ her husband. Sh^ Agrawaliurlfaersufeutsthatifferequired^ paymeHtshallfcecatculatedandtsIeasediri^^ twoweeksaftersupplyofrequired-dQcumeHf&, | e 3. Inview ofthe foregoing, afieoi^ngto lean dcciunselfl})pe^^ ;.'f'??:?-j*®?^;':1^';'^'i''?il:3^^ pditioner,aothingsun^s{bF^U(lie^ 4. Aceordingly,thewritpetiticMiis<iisposetto£ aiii! Sd/- ; : ;.1. Satisb^Agnib"trl Judge