IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 30TH OCTOBER 2009 / 8TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 30882 of 2009(E) ------------------------------- PETITIONER:- --------------- K.K.RAJAN, JAMABANDHI SUPERINTENDENT COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, THRISSUR. BY ADV. MR. ELVIN PETER P.J. MS. POOJA SURENDRAN RESPONDENTS:- --------------- 1. THE COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD-REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ROUND NORTH, THRISSUR. 2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER, COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, THRISSUR. 3. M.G.JAGADESAN, MANAGER, VADAKKUMNATHAN DEVASWOM, THRISSUR. BY ADV. MR. K. GOPALAKRISHNAKURUP, S.C., COCHIN DEWASOM BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ........................................... W.P.(C)NO.30882 OF 2009-E ............................................. Dated this the 30th day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T Ext.P1 order is under challenge. By this order, the petitioner and the 3rd respondent are transferred mutually. A reading of the order itself discloses that the petitioner who was working in Cochin Devaswom is now posted in the Vadakkumnatha Temple and the 3rd respondent has been posted in his place. Both these establishments are located at Thrissur. Not only that there is no violation of guidelines of transfer but even no personal inconvenience has been made out. Therefore, I am not persuaded to interfere with that order. If the petitioner has filed Ext.P2 representation before the 2nd respondent and the same has been received, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider the said representation and pass orders thereon. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE cl : 2 : : 3 :