1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Writ Petition No.1286 of 2008 Samata Shikshan Sanstha Petitioners Vs. Shri Namdeo Sakharam Patil & ors. Respondents Mr.Y.A.Sakhare with Mr.Siddharth Karpe i/b. YKS Legal for petitioners. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. April 21, 2008 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners who are aggrieved by the order dated 28/11/2007 passed by the Deputy Charity Commissioner at Kolhapur. . Inquiry Application No.1317 of 2006 was filed under Section 41A of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 by the respondent nos.1 and 2 and the said application was disposed as withdrawn on the basis of the purshis filed by the applicants, as per the 2 impugned order. The only objection raised to the impugned order of withdrawal is to the following observations, "...It has been observed from contention of all parties that Election of the Managing Committee of Trust have been conducted on 04/02/2007. Because of that only applicants have withdrawn their application." . The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in the withdrawal purshis at Exhibit 27 subsequently the words "on 4/2/2007" have been interpolated after the petitioners’ counsel submitted his no objection. Such allegations could have been properly addressed to if the petitioners had approached the very same authority i.e. the Deputy Charity Commissioner with an application to correct the facts and surprisingly though the impugned order is passed on 28/11/2007, this petition has been filed before this Court on 8/2/2008. Whether the withdrawal purshis at Exhibit 27 suffered from interpolation or not is an issue which cannot be considered in a writ petition and the proper remedy for the petitioners was to approach the very same 3 authority i.e. the Deputy Charity Commissioner for corrections. Hence this petition must fail at the threshold and the same is hereby rejected. Interim order stands vacated. (B.H.MARL