1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4275 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1224 OF 2010 Smt. Seventabai w/o Baban Pandey ...Applicant VERSUS Smt. Vithabai w/o Tukaram Pandey and ors. ...Respondents ..... Shri U.K.Patil, advocate for the applicant Shri S.T.Shelke, advocate for respondent no.1 Shri N.B.Patil, A.G.P. For , advocate for respondent nos. 2 to 5 ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATED : 16 th September, 2010 PER COURT : 1 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 This is an application, preferred by the applicant/petitioner to implead Rangnath Balaji Waghchaure as party respondent no.6 in Writ Petition No. 1224 of 2010. 3 For the reasons stated in the application, and more particularly in para 8 thereof, it appears that the said Rangnath Balaji 2 Waghchaure is the purchaser of the suit property during the pendency of present petition, and therefore, he is required to be added as respondent no.6 in the writ petition and present application is required to be added in the interest of justice. 4 In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’. It is directed that Rangnath Balaji Waghchaure be added as respondent no.6 in Writ Petition No. 1224 of 2010. Amendment be carried out with the period of two weeks and present application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) dbm/ca4275.10