IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-12-2010 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN W.P.No.28954 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 M.Sumathy ... Petitioner Versus 1.The District Collector, Namakkal District, Namakkal. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o the Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal. 3.The Thasildar, Taluk Office, Rasipuram, Namakkal District. 4.R.Krishnan 5.K.Arul Mani, ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the 4th and 5th Respondents herein from in any manner forming or laying road in Survey No.86/1 (measuring an extent of about 3 acres which is classified as 'Kunru Puramboku land') in Muthukalipatti Village Panchayat, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District and consequently direct the 1st Respondent herein to take action against the 4th and 5th Respondents for the damages caused to the 'Kunru Purambokku land' and prevent any further encroachment . For Petitioner : Mr.G.Arul Murugan For Respondents: Mr.S.Gopinathan (R1,R2 and R3) Additional Government Pleader https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1,2 and 3. 2. Though the prayer sought for by the petitioner, in the present writ petition, is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 31.05.2010, is directed to be disposed of by the second respondent, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents 1, 2 and 3 has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 31.05.2010, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the fourth and the fifth respondents, as well as to the other persons concerned, if any, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The petitioner is directed to furnish to the second respondent a copy of the representation, dated 31.05.2010, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition stands closed. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar arr To 1.The District Collector, Namakkal District, Namakkal. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o the Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal. 3. The Thasildar, Taluk Office, Rasipuram, Namakkal District. 1 cc To Mr.F.Arulmurugan, Advocate, SR.90895 1 cc To The Government Pleader, SR.91304 W.P.No.28954 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 MG (CO) RH (6.1.11) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/