IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION No. 2629/2003. OF MOTION No. 2629/2003. OF MOTION No. 2629/2003. IN INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) No.721/2003. TAX APPEAL (LODGING) No.721/2003. TAX APPEAL (LODGING) No.721/2003. The Commissioner of Income-tax Mumbai City-III Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400 - 020. ..Appellant. Vs. Vs. Vs. ICICI Bank Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr Ashok Kotangale with P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr S. J.Mehta for the Respondent. CORAM:DR.S. CORAM:DR.S. CORAM:DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN RADHAKRISHNAN RADHAKRISHNAN AND AND AND V.C. DAGA,JJ. V.C. DAGA,JJ. V.C. DAGA,JJ. DATED:26TH DATED:26TH DATED:26TH MARCH, 2007. MARCH, 2007. MARCH, 2007. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Parties. 2. Perused Notice of Motion and affidavit in support thereof. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out for condoning delay of 92 days in filing the above appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant. Hence, the notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (V.C. (V.C. (V.C. DAGA,J.) DAGA,J.) DAGA,J.) (DR. (DR. (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)