1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 1000 of 2011 Rajendra Prasad Kuriyal S/o Late Shri Chinta Mani R/o Dhaluwala, Police Station Muni-Ki-Reti (Narendra Nagar) District Tehri Garhwal …..…Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Senior Superintendent of Police, District Tehri Garhwal 2. Incharge Inspector, Police Station Muni-Ki-Reti (Narendra Nagar) District Tehri Garhwal 3. Sub Inspector, Local Intelligence Sub Unit Muni-Ki-Reti, District Tehri Garhwal ……….Respondents Mr. Sanjay Raturi, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, A.G.A. , present for the State. Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard. 2. By means of this writ petition moved under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought quashing of the First Information dated 09.10.2011, registered as crime No. 42 of 2011, relating to offence punishable under section 7 read with section 14 of Foreigners Act, 1946, Police 2 Station Muni-Ki-Reti, District Tehri Garhwal. 3. The allegations in the FIR are that some five foreigners stayed in a hotel known as Divine Ganga Cottage situated in Tapovan, District Tehri Garhwal, on 29.09.2011. Under Rule 14 (6) of Rules framed under Foreigners Act, 1946, information was required to be given to the registration/ police authorities within a period of twenty four hours. However, information about the stay of the foreigners was given after twenty four hours. Due to that reason FIR has been lodged. 4. Having gone through the contents of the FIR this Court finds that neither the lodging of FIR in question is abuse of process of law nor it can be said that ingredients of the offence punishable under sub section (6) of section 14 read with Rule 14 framed under Foreigners Act, 1946, are not made out. As such, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the investigation of the case. 5. Therefore, the writ petition is summarily disposed of with the observation that if the petitioner Rajendra Prasad Kuriyal surrenders before the court concerned his bail application shall 3 be heard, and disposed of without unreasonable delay keeping in mind that though the rule has been violated but there appears no malafide as the communication was made though belated. (Stay application no. 11909 of 2011, also stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Parul 16.11.2011