1 S.B.CR. MISC. APPLICATION NO. 873/2008 IN S.B. CR. MISC. PETITION NO. 489/2007 (Smt. Geeta Vs. Khuma Ram) DATE OF ORDER : 17/7/2008 HON'BLE MR.BHANWAROO KHAN, J. Mr.B.S. Rathore, for the petitioner. The order dated 21.1.2008 passed by this Court in Cr. Misc. Petition No. 489/2007. Learned counsel for the petitioner has moved an application that in the said order inadvertently by wrong typing the petitioner was directed to deposit Rs.500/- p.m. during the course of trial, but instead of petitioner the word respondent should have been mentioned as the petitioner is wife who claimed maintenance from her husband Khuma Ram i.e. respondent. The entire order was gone through and instead of petitioner the word respondent should have been there, as the relief was claimed by the petitioner against the respondent. The petitioner could not have been directed to deposit money but she should have received this money from her husband, so the 2 word occurred at Page No.2 that instead of petitioner the word respondent should be read and total sentence would be respondent is directed to deposit Rs.500/- p.m. during the course of trial. Accordingly, the misc. application is disposed of. (BHANWAROO KHAN)J. Rm/