IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal First Bail Application No.1174 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Lokendra Kumar Saini @ Lakki ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party ________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.2773/09 U/Ss 292 IPC & Section 4/6 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 & Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, P.S. Kotdwar, Distt. Pauri Garhwal Dated: December 1, 2009 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. Kurban Ali, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. GA for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that as per the averments made in the FIR, two obscene C.Ds. have been shown to be recovered from the possession of the applicant. He further submitted that the applicant is a student of M.A. and no specific allegation has been made against him for the offence in which he was sent to the jail. He further submitted that the main accused in the case is Vishwaraj Rajput who has also been assigned the main role in the above-said offence. He further submitted that he is in jail since 8.11.2009 and he has got no criminal history before this case. After considering all the facts and circumstances, on hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the contents of the FIR and other material on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant-Lokendra Kumar Saini @ Lakki be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and also on furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction CJM, Pauri Garhwal The bail application is disposed of accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 01.12.2009 Rajeev Dang