1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION {PIL} REVIEW PETITION NO.106 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2063 OF 2002 Janhit Manch & Ors. .... Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.237 OF 2008 IN {PIL} REVIEW PETITION NO.106 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2063 OF 2002 Janhit Manch & Ors. .... Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents And Laxman Waman Thakur .... Applicant Shri Bhagvanji Raiyani, Petitioner No.2, in-person. Shri Pradeep Jadhav, AGP, for the State. Shri R.K. Yadav for the Applicant in support of the Chamber Summons. 2 CORAM: BILAL NAZKI & A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED: SEPTEMBER 22, 2009 P.C: The writ petition has been decided by this Court on 24-8-2006. More than three years have passed. This review is coming up today. The petitioners submit that the said order needs to be reviewed as the respondents have given incorrect list of the temples and shrines on the roads. But we find from the order that the Court gave direction with respect to all the unauthorised and illegal shrines on the roads belonging to MHADA, State Government, MMRDA, MBPT, etc.. The petitioners also want review of the said order on the ground that the Court has only given liberty to the concerned authorities to take action for removal of all such illegal shrines in accordance with law. The petitioners submit that the Court should have directed the removal of all the unauthorised and illegal shrines. The Court thought it proper to issue directions of the nature it has issued. If the petitioners were aggrieved by such directions, they should have 3 moved the Supreme Court. In our view, this is not a case for review of the said order and, in any case, no structure, whether it is a shrine or a temple can be removed without following the due process of law. Therefore, in our view, the Division Bench had directed the concerned authorities that they are free to take action for removal of such illegal shrines in accordance with law. With these observations, the review petition is dismissed. In view of dismissal of the review petition, the Chamber Summons No.237 of 2008 does not survive and accordingly stands disposed of. (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (A.R. JOSHI, J.)