1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 869 OF 2009 M/s Gandhi Oil Depot .. PETITIONER VERSUS Jagdish Oil Industries & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. Yawalkar, Advocate for the petitioner. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 1st APRIL, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave granted. Petition stands rejected as withdrawn. 2 In view of dismissal of petition, pending civil application, if any, stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp867.09.odt 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO. 9386 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 869 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders | CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 1st APRIL, 2010 1 Petitioner is requesting for setting aside the conditional order passed on 26-2-2010 dismissing the petition for want of prosecution on account of failure to remove office objections within the stipulated time. 2 Considering the contentions raised in the application, application deserves to be allowed and the same is accordingly allowed. Order passed by this court dismissing the petition for want of prosecution on 26-2-2010 is recalled and the petition is restored to its original number. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb / office /wp869.09.odt