CW 10183/10 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.10183/2010 Suresh Chandra Sharma. Vs Rajasthan Gramin Bank & Ors Date of Order ::: 09/08/2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. BL Sharma, for petitioner Counsel submits that the petitioner had worked as Messenger since 01/08/2006 however his services have been terminated by verbal order w.e.f. 15/07/2010. Neither the appointment order nor the termination order is on record and the petitioner has placed on record copy of the extract of attendance register as Anx.1 showing his working in the respondent-Bank. There is nothing on record as to what procedure was adopted while he was appointed in absence whereof, the question, which he has raised of being terminated by oral order passed by the respondents, is a disputed question of fact which cannot be looked into by this Court within its limited scope of judicial review under Article 226. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to avail remedy available under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, if so advised. (Ajay Rastogi), J. Raghu/p1/10183-CW-2010-final.doc