IN THE PARSI CHIEF MATRIMONIAL COURT AT BOMBAY SUIT NO.16 OF 2004 Rusi Naoroji Engineer......Plaintiff No.1 Versus Homai Rusi Engineer..........Plaintiff No.2 Ms.A.S,. Khushrushahi for the Plaintiff No.1. Mr. Z.D. Sahukar for plaintiff No.2. Plaintiff No.1 present in person. Plaintiff No.2 absent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, J. F.I. REBELLO, J. F.I. REBELLO, J. DATE DATE DATE : : : 25th October,2004 P.C.: 1. This is a suit for divorce by mutual consent. The plaintiff No.1 is present in the Court. He files an affidavit dated 25th October, 2004. He states that no force, pressure or coercion is applied to file the present suit. 2. Plaintiff No.2 is absent. However, affidavit dated 20th October, 2004 is taken on record in which it is set out that that the suit and the consent has not been obtained by force, coercion or undue influence. 3. On a consideration of the averments in the plaint, the statements made to this Court both oral and on affidavit, I am of the opinion that no force, pressure, coercion or undue influence has been exercised on the parties and that they voluntarily seek divorce by mutual consent of their own free will. 4. Considering the aforesaid this will be a fit case to grant reliefs as prayed for. In the light of that suit decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). 5. Undertaking in the consent terms accepted. Decree be drawn up accordingly. F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J. REBELLO, J. REBELLO, J.