1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. SUIT NO. 3032 OF 2006 ALONG WITH NMS/3748/2006 Sarla Jotindra Mehta & ors. .... Plaintiffs vs Ms.Nalini Zaverchand Mehta & ors. ... Defendants Mr.Rajesh Shah i/b. Markand Gandhi & Co. for the plaintiffs. Mr.Prashant Desai i/b. Bilawala & Co. for defendants 1, 2 and 3. Mr. Prashant Ghelani for defendfants 4 and 5. Mr.N.R.Modi i/b. Rustomji & Ginwala for defendant no.6. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 14th August, 2009 P.C.: 1 The parties have arrived at settlement and recorded in the Consent Terms executed by the plaintiffs and defendants 4, 5 and 6. The plaintiff is not pressing the Suit against defendants 1 to 3. The learned counsel appearing for defendants 1 and 2 have no objection for Consent Terms dated 24.04.2009. The Consent Terms dated 24.04.2009, marked “X” is taken on record. It is signed by the respective parties and the Advocates. There is no dispute about the identity and/or identification of the signatures. The parties are present in the court. 2 2 The statement is also made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties that the Consent Terms dated 24.04.2009 is well within the frame work of law and the record. 3 In view of this, the present Suit is disposed of in terms of Consent Terms dated 24.04.2009 with liberty. 4 In view of above, the above Notice of Motion is also disposed of. 5 All interim reliefs, if any, stands vacated accordingly. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)