IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 27TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 5TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 25392 of 2011(Y) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. INDRAJITH S. KUMAR, S/O.SREEKUMAR R., AGED 22, KOZHIKKATTIL HOUSE, THOTTAKATTUKARA P.O. ALUVA-683 108. 2. SABARISH I. MENON, S/O.INDUCHOODAN, AGED 21, UNNATHI HOUSE, VADAKKE OTTAMPILLI HOUSE, EROOR, THRIPPUNITHURA-682306. 3. NIKHIL K., S/O.DR.ANIL PIZHARADI, AGED 21, C-11/61, KAVILAKADU, PURATHOOR P.O., MALAPPURAM-676 102. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEWS K.PHILIP SMT.T.MANASY RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY IT'S REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686562. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686562. BY ADV. SRI T.A. SHAJI, SC FOR UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DS WP(C).No. 25392 of 2011(Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE HALL TICKET ISSUED TO THE FIRST PETITIONER IN THE SUPPLEMENTARY EXAMINATION P2: COPY OF THE HALL TCKET ISSUED TO THE SECOND PETITIONER IN THE SUPPLEMENTARY EXAMINATION P3: COPY OF THE HALL TCKET ISSUED TO THE THIRD PETITIONER IN THE SUPPLEMENTARY EXAMINATION P4: COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY FIRST PETITIONER FOR SCRUTINY OF ANSWER SCRIPTS P5: COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY FIRST PETITIONER FOR REVALUATION OF ANSWER SCRIPTS RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE DS ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).25392/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 27th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of the failed papers in the 6th semester B.Tech Supplementary Examination vide Exts.P4 and P5 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs