IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43934 of 2010 CHANDRAMAULI YADAV, SON OF SRI BHUSAN YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PIPRAPUR, P.S. SARE DISTRICT NALANDA. ---- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. SMT. SARITA DEVI, WIFE OF CHANDRAMAULI YADAV, DAUGHTER OF SRI KHAYALI YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHSAR, P.S. SHEIKHPURA, DISTRICT SHEIKHPURA. --- OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 3 26.3.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. In this case, learned counsel for the petitioner was directed to serve a copy of the bail application on the counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no. 2. Although Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of the informant but nobody appears on behalf of the informant to pursue the matter. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case under Sections 323, 504, 379 and 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code. Apart from other allegations, the allegation against the petitioner is that after he heard that his mother etc. had assaulted the informant, he took his wife on motorcycle and left her near the station. It is also alleged that he took away her jewellery. In the circumstance aforesaid, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. This application is dismissed. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)