IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CASE NO.4263 OF 2011 ASHOK KR. MAURYA, SUSPENDED DISTRICT SUB-REGISTRAR, SON OF LATE NATHUNI PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AKAUNA, P.O.-SHERGHATI, DISTRICT-GAYA. AT PRESENT AT THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR OF REGISTRATION OFFICES, PURNEA DIVISION, PURNEA. .... .... PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. MR. AMIR SUBHAANI, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION, EXCISE AND PROHIBITION (REGISTRATION), GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, VIKAS BHAWAN, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 3. MRS. N. VIJAYALAKSHMI, INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISRATION, VIKAS BHAWAN, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA, AT PRESENT MANAGING DIRECOTR, BIHAR STATE WOMEN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, 2ND FLOOR, INDIRA BHAWAN, PATNA, BIHAR. 4. MR. ARJUN PRASAD, JOINT SECRETARY, REGISRATION, EXCISE PROHIBITION (REGISTRATION), VIKAS BHAWAN, PATNA. AT PRESENT ADDITIONAL SECRETARY, WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, SONE BHAWAN, PATNA. .... .... OPPOSITE PARTIES ---------- 2 20-10-2011 Heard counsel for the parties. Having regard to the fact that there is no clear proof of the service of the copy of the order dated 14.07.2009 passed by this Court in the connected case on the opposite parties on 2 17.08.2009, and the petitioner himself claims to have sent it by Office letter no. 236 dated 10.08.2009, but the same has been shown to be served by way of personal service effected by the petitioner, this Court would not find any merit in this application, specially when the Authority has already drawn the departmental proceeding against the petitioner on 15.01.2010. That being so, this application is wholly misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed. RANJAN (Mihir Kumar Jha, J)