THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION NO.32103 OF 2011 O R D E R: This Writ Petition is filed seeking to issue writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos.3 and 4 in interfering with the construction of house of the petitioner i.e, Ground + First Floor in premises bearing H.No.1-6-249/19/6/A/2 consisting of 196.50 sq.yards situated at Friends Colony, Zamisthanpur, Ramnagar, Hyderabad on the basis of the permission granted by the Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (for short, ‘the Corporation’) vide permit No.4891/DC/CZ-Circle 9/2011, dated 25.08.2011, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. The brief facts, stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, are that the petitioner is the owner and possessor of the aforementioned house having purchased the same under two registered sale deeds. He demolished the old house and applied for grant of permission for construction of building from the Corporation. When the Corporation directed the petitioner to obtain No Objection and TSLR Certificates from respondent No.3, the petitioner filed W.P.No.20739 of 2011 seeking a direction to the Commissioner and respondent No.2 not to insist for production of TSLR and No Objection Certificates from respondent No.3 and the same was disposed of on 25.07.2011 directing the Commissioner to consider the application of the petitioner without insisting for production of TSLR and No Objection Certificates. On 25.08.2011, the Commissioner granted permission to the petitioner. The petitioner gathered the building material and commenced the construction work. He dug the foundation and raised pillars upto ground level. Respondent No.4 visited the place of construction and objected the petitioner from proceeding with the construction stating that he should not proceed with the construction, as he did not obtain No Objection Certificate for obtaining the construction permission from the Corporation. The petitioner is entitled to proceed with the construction of G+1, as per the plan approved by the Corporation. Respondent Nos.3 and 4 have no authority to interfere with the construction of the building. Hence, the present writ petition. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that respondent Nos.3 and 4 are interfering with the construction of the house of the petitioner without there being any authority and hence, he prays to issue a direction to respondent Nos.3 and 4 not to interfere with the construction of the house of the petitioner. 4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.3 and 4 contended that since the land in question is belonging to the Government, the petitioner has no right to construct the building and hence, there are no grounds to allow the writ petition. 5. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.2 Corporation stated that the building permission was given to the petitioner to construct the house. 6. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent Nos.3 and 4 are interfering with the construction of his aforementioned house. It is not in dispute before this Court that permission was granted by respondent No.2 Corporation vide permit No.4891/DC/CZ-Circle 9/2011, dated 25.08.2011. If the land of the petitioner belongs to the Government, the petitioner has no right to construct the house. But the documents filed by the petitioner show about his prima facie title. Furthermore, basing on the prima facie title, respondent No.2 Corporation granted permission to construct a house with Ground + 1 floor in the premises. Therefore, respondent Nos.3 and 4 have no authority to interfere with the house of the petitioner. Hence, respondent Nos.3 and 4 are directed not to interfere with the construction of the house of the petitioner except in accordance with law. 7. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _​_____________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU 27th December, 2011 AMD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION NO.32103 OF 2011 Date:27.12.2011 AMD