: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4602 OF 2009 Netaji Subhashchandra Bos Sarvajanik Vachanalaya. ... Petitioner Vs 1. State of Maharashtra & 2 ors. ... Respondents Mr. V.S. Deokar for the petitioner. Mr. V.S. Gokhale, AGP, for the respondents. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 7TH SEPTEMBER, 2009. P.C.: 1. In paragraph 12 of the Affidavit of the respondents, the respondents have stated that post facto hearing can be granted to the petitioner and the respondents have relied upon the case of M.S. Gill Vs. Chief Election Commissioner and the case of Maneka Gandhi Vs. Passport Authority of India. : 2 : 2. Since the respondents have shown willingness to give post facto hearing to the petitioner, the petitioner states that he will appear before the respondents and satisfy the respondents that forgery has not been committed by the petitioner and that the petitioner is eligible for grant of a Library. 3. Under these circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the Petition with liberty to approach the respondents for the purpose of hearing as contemplated under paragraph 12 of the Affidavit. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn. The respondents are directed to give a hearing to the petitioner as stated in paragraph 12. Writ Petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (R.M. SAVANT, J.) (S.B. MHASE, J.)