^l HIGH COURT OF CHHATT8©OARH,:_BILASPUR Hon'bie Shrl S.R. Nayak, CJ No. 3544 GF 2005 PETITIONER l^ril Versus 1. 2. Smt. Leeiavati Gupta 43 years, W/o Shjv Prasad Gupta, R/o Viifage : Nawa Para (A) Post: Badihardl, Block : Pusore, Tehsil & District: Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. Sub Djvisiona! Officer (Revenue) Prescribed Authority, Raigarh District: Raigarh, Chhattisgarh Smt. Jyoti Satpathy, Aged about 30 years, W/o Jeewan Satpathy, R/o Village : Nawa Para (A) Post: Badihardi, BSock : Pusore Tehsii & District: Raigarh, (C.G.) Smt. Vinodjni, W./o Ravindra Sharma, R/o Viiiage : Nawa Para (A) Post: Badihardi, B!ock: Pusore, Tehsii & District: Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. Present: Mr B.D. Guru, learned counsel for the petltioner. Mr. Yashwant Singh, learned GA. for respondent No,1/ Mr, Upendra Bharat, tearned counset for respondents 2 &.3 ORAL (Passed on 8tt1 of December 2005) The point urged in this writ petitlon could be urged as a ground of attack, if the order that may be passed by the first respondent in the pending etection petition, goes against the petitioner herein. There is no —-2.- ^^ need for thss Court, at thls stage, to entertain thss writ petition and undertake the tersability of the ground urged in this writ petitlon. The writ petitlon Is, therefbre, dismlssed, nowever, reservlng iiberty to the petitioner to urge this ground, in the event of first respondent passing an adverse order agajnstthe petitioner jn appropriate iegai proceedings. Sd/- Chief Justice