BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:13/07/2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR WP(MD)No.7719 of 2011 S.Kumar :Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Headmaster, Panchayat Union Elementary School, Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai -18. :Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 05.10.2010 within a stipulated time. For petitioner :Mr.G.Ramanathan For respondents:Mr.T.R.Janardhanan Additional Government Pleader ORDER Though the petitioner has sought for a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 05.10.2010 for re-enquiry with regard to an order dated 22.09.2010 passed by the Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Information Commissioner, Chennai in case No.10422/enquiry/2010, when the learned counsel for the petitioner was confronted with a question as to the provisions dealing with the review or re-enquiry, he is not able to state any provision under the Act. In the absence of any legal or statutory right under the Right to Information Act and in the absence of placing any materials enabling the authority to re- enquire into the matter, which has already come to an end, this Court is of the view that the petitioner has not made out a case for mandamus. Hence, the relief sought for is declined and the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar / TRUE COPY / Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.The Headmaster, Panchayat Union Elementary School, Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai -18. +1CC to The Special Government Pleader. SR.No.22962. +1CC to Mr.G.Ramanathan, Advocate. SR.No.22727. Gcg WP(MD)No.7719 of 2011 RP/25.07.2011/1P/5C. 13.07.2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/