IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI MONDAY, THE 13TH OCTOBER 2008 / 21ST ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 12040 of 2008(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SISILY, SHINE BHAVAN, PLAKKOTHUKONAM, AANAPPARA, VELLARADA, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.SAJU.S.A RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL), OFFICE OF THE S.P (RURAL), KURAVANKONAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE OF DY.S.P., NEYYATTINKARA. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLARADA POLICE STATION, VELLARADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. PENALOPPY, D/O. PAPPU NADAR, HARI VILASOM, POOVANKUZHI, VELLARADA, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. BASANIYO, S/O. PAPPUNADAR, B.S. BHAVAN, AANAPPARA, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. JASAYYAN, BIJU BHAVAN, AANAPPARA, VELLARADA.P.O. NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN FOR R4,5,6 SRI.SAIJO HASSAN FOR R4,5,6 SRI.RAFEEK. V.K. FOR R4,5,6 SRI.G.RAJESH (DIWAN) FOR R4,5,6 SMT.AMRITA JAYARAM FOR R4,5,6 GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 12040/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1: COPY OF AGREEMENT DT.12.12.2007. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY PETITIONER DT.11.3.2008 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE. K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.12040 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of October, 2008 J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~~~~~ Balakrishnan Nair, J. This Court while admitting the writ petition passed an interim order on 8.4.2008. The learned counsel for the respondents 4 to 6 submitted that petitioner owes substantial amounts to them and they propose to proceed against her, only, in accordance with law to recover the amount. In other words, they do not propose to employ violence against her. In view of the said submission, this writ petition is closed without prejudice to the contentions of both sides. (K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) ps