IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.863 of 2010 1. SHANTI DEVI 2. Umesh Bharti 3. Mithilesh Bharti 4. Kushket Bharti 5. Chhotan Bharti 6. Manju Devi 7. Kamla Kuer 8. Shushila Devi 9. Rekha Devi Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 02.02.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the application of petitioner no.5, inasmuch as during the pendency of the application he has been arrested. Such permission is accorded. Accordingly, the application of petitioner no.5 is dismissed as withdrawn. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that to counter the allegation leveled by petitioner no.2 against the informant’s party, attempt is made to make the allegation serious for quarrel in between the parties for land dispute and in that continuation, one of the petitioners is alleged for committing theft of chain of gold and Umesh Bharti for fersa blow but injury is found simple caused by hard and blunt substances and all the petitioners are apprehending their arrest which never can be justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner nos. 1 to 4 2 and 6 to 9 is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 111 of 2009, above named petitioner nos. 1 to 4 and 6 to 9 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saran at Chapra subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)