IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36666 of 2008 LALITA DEVI, wife of Mantu Yadav, resident of Village Patut, P.S. Bikram, District Patna ----Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.11.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Bikram P.S. Case No.51/08 for the alleged offences registered under sections 420, 465, 468, 471, 474 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is to the effect that an application was filed by the petitioner in the Circle Office for obtaining the land ownership certificate. However, the endorsement made over the application by the Circle Officer in favour of the Circle Inspector/Halka Karamchari is alleged to be forged. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no offence is made out since, admittedly, the petitioner has submitted the application for obtaining the aforesaid certificate. Whatever endorsement if at all is needed that is to be made by the Circle officials and only a certificate was to be given by the relevant register of record of rights and as such the allegation that there is forgery in the endorsement over the said application does not stand to reason. The learned APP is not in a position to refute the submission. 2 Considering the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of her arrest or surrender in connection with Bikram P.S. Case No.51/08 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)