IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38204 of 2009 1. PARSHURAM SAH 2. PARICHHAN SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 04.11.2009 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioners are accused in Mahrajganj P.S. Case No. 85 of 2009 for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 452, 504 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the allegations as set out in the F.I.R. is omnibus in nature and nothing has been attributed to these petitioners. He further submits that for the same occurrence the brother of the informant has instituted a Complaint on 20.6.2009, copy of which is placed at Anneuxre-2 to the application and in which he has specifically named nine persons who were party to the occurrence and in which the name of the petitioners does not find mention. He also submits that subsequently the F.I.R. has been instituted for the same occurrence after a lapse of four days and in which the name of the petitioners has been added. Learned counsel submits that the inclusion of the name of the present petitioners is an 2 afterthought and thus the petitioners deserve bail. Considering the facts and circumstances, let petitioners, namely, Parshuram Sah and Parichhan Sah be released on bail upon each one of them individually furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 85 of 2009. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)