^ ^' fr^ JN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIOiTURE XT BILASlPUR(CHH^TI>ISG&RH) NRIT PETITION N0, ^°>-C3-J-OF 2003 PETITION&RS : T.K.Bhattacharya,soxriijfylate: A<,c,Bhattacharya, aged about 54 yearsp at present working as Eiieputy Managing Director^Korba^ Chhattisgarh State Laghu Vanopaj Sangh,Distri<3t Vanopaj Co-operative Union Ltd .Korba ,Dis triet-Korba , (C.G.) v s R a u s RESE?ONS®N^ '^"y ^^ r^-- •^€.^°?^ $yf lo State of Chhattisgarh^through the Secrebary^ ^^ Fores t Bepar tment ^ Rajlpur, (CoGo) ^c^- •S^ s ] 2 »_jpx-lnci^l Chief Conservator, ...^ Cv—^of Forest.Forest D-epartment, : 3, Shr.i PoCopaikra, Divisional Forest officer, Soufeh Narayanpur^ Dastriet Bastar, (C»G,) $ f/^—ManaglngDirector, Chhattisgarh State Laghu Vanopaj Sangh,Raipyr»(C.G»), .V" WRIT_pETlTIpN_UNDSR; ARTICI^S; 226/227 OF TEiE: CX)NSTITUTJON OP IKD3^« i rt- XI-HC-22 3T?^T^FT f^Ti?F371^ ^H\^ ^rft^f -^^ ^i<4id<4, ^Ti1^^<o, 1o^n^li< _...^..^.^Z^C^j ]^3 ^....^.;..v..:.<..-..w.....».... ,200 ^P-IWWW^ iT^T ^n^?T^C<nw ^feT 12/03/2004 SIui Y» Pandey, coiinsej| Shri Saxyay S, Aga|wal, respondents no. 1 and 2/Stat^. Noae for respondent nol Shri Shailendra ShiikN By ttiis writ pctition <^l^f<yf<fll ^H<A '? fe^ <Fs|^t< "^ ^tf^P? 3?i^T for fhe petitioner. Panel Lawver for the 3. counsel for fhe respondent no.4. under Articlc 226/227 of thc Constitution of India, the pc|titioner faas chaUenged fhe order dated 02/09/2003 whereby f|ie petitioner has been tmnsferred from Kal^ora to Narayanpzxrj The case of the petitic|ner is fhat he is worlring as aa Assfatant Conservator of Fo^est The petitioner after joiaiag State of Chhattsgarh at Rai^ur, was traasterred to Korba as /Deputy Managing Director a}ad he was rclieved fix>m Raipur vide order dated 24/01/20| 30/01/2001. In Februaxy,! il aad he joitied his duty on 2002 fhe District Minor Porest Union Korba was spUt into t^o parts by the State Goverament; one known as Distdct Unio|n Korba faltmg under texritorial land area of Korba Forest Qivision and the other as District Union Kal^hora &iUiiig iixid^r fhe texritorial Forest Division. After re-ox^aaization, he wa^ directed to look afiter fhe work pertamiag to newly found Dis ;t Union Katg^hora, Leanied counsel for t4e petitioner submits fhat by the impugned order dated 02/0[9/2003 fhe petitioner has been traasferred fix>xn present pl^ce of postiag to Narayanpur ia —I; ]- T~ XI-HC-22 SRTI^T^T f^ri^sn^i s^^ich ^^ ^ ^:^ ^ 'S^ ^WM^, W^f^S, M^Kiy •WNdl ^MB^ •M •^Er^T' 3?n^y '^ff^R •yf^a ^ reslpondent order to acconunodate fhe the petitioner may be allowed) respondeiit no,l to whic|i respondent/State has no objec|tion. Having heard fhe leanajed haviag rcgard to fhe facte aQ.(|l petitioner is aUowed to laake aU his grievaaces to respond^at No.l shall decide fhe days from fhe date of rcceipt| grievaxices, ia an objective accoxxlaace wifh law, Wifh the aforesaid directiions of. Consequently, M.W.P.Nosl t.A.Nos. 1550/2004 and 1392J Certified copy as per Rul^s. counsel for the parties and circuxuistaixces of the c^se, fb.e detatted representation raisiag No,l aad ia tuni rcspondciit withia a period of fhirty |of the same considermg aU his tnbnner wifh a reasoaed order ia rcprese^itation obl^id^1"l 1RTR^f ^ fe^ ^RC$R ^T 3?P<R 3??^T no<3. He subxaits fhat to inake a representafion to fhe learcied counsel for fhe fhe petition staads disposed 2952/2003, 2739/2003 and 2004 also staad disposed of Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [^^^s^