FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WP/10365/2010 PARSURAM V/S STATE ... Shri S.L.Bhapkar, Advocate for petitioner, Shri N.B.Patil, AGP for respondent No.1, Shri Shivaji Shelke, Advocate for respondent No.2. ... 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. The petitioner challenges the election of respondents 6 to 10 as the Members of the Gram Panchayat. 3. The petition involves various disputes questions of facts, which could have been gone only in the Election Petition, if aggrieved party would have filed the same. In extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, we are afraid, whether such an exercise would be permissible. 4. In this view of the matter, no interference is called for. Writ Petition stands rejected. 5. The petitioner, if any remedy is available in common law, would be at liberty to take recourse to such a remedy and the rejection of the present Writ Petition would not come in his way. (R.M.BORDE, J.) (B.R.GAVAI, J.) Dt.10.12.2010 akl