M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 3208 of 1992 Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agaihotri, J. Shn' Somkant Verma,‘ counsel for the petitioner. None for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (18th January 2006) Lealned counsel for the petitioner appeared on 13.9.2005 and made a submission that the peu'tioner wanted to engage his services, but Vakalamama was not executed in his favour. At his instance, the matter was adjoulned on that day. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, learned counsel repeats the same submission that the petiu'oner had informed him over phone earlier and thereafter, but had not sent any Vakalamama. In absence of Vakalatnama, learned Advocate cannot be treated as an authorised Advocate of the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. a // i . € Mi? *’/’/§dl- Satish K. Agnihotri Jude g Petitioner Ramdas Wahne, Near Budha Shankar Nagar, PO: Mohan Nagar, Durg (C.G.). -Versus— Respondents Th6 General Manager, Hindusthan Steel Workers Construction Limited Bhilaj 2. (HSCL) Bhilaj (C.G.) State Industrial Industrial Court, Raipur Bench, HIG—lé, Shankar Nagar,