In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... Criminal Misc. No.1495 of 2011 and Criminal Misc. No.M-8873 of 2010 ..... Date of decision:12.1.2011 Asha Devi Hooda .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana and another ....Respondents .... Present: Mr. Pankaj Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harmeet Singh Deol, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State. None for respondent No.2. ..... S.S. Saron, J. Cr. Misc. No.1495 of 2011: Copies of the order dated 18.2.2009 (Annexure-P.9) passed by the learned Illaqa Magistrate, Gurgaon and the order dated 18.3.2009 (Annexure-P.10) passed by the Illaqa Magistrate, Gurgaon are taken on record subject to just exceptions. The criminal miscellaneous application stands disposed of. Cr. Misc. No.M-8873 of 2010: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks directions to release her on bail in the event of her arrest in a complaint case No.345/1 dated 10.11.1997 filed by Ranbir Singh (respondent No.2) in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurgaon alleging commission of offences under Sections 416, Cr. Misc. No.M-8873 of 2010 [2] 420, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC. Notice of motion was issued in the case. On 25.11.2010, Mr. S.K. Birwal, Advocate appeared for Mr. N.D. Achint, Advocate for respondent No.2. However, today no one has put in appearance for respondent No.2. The petitioner in terms of order dated 9.4.2009 (Annexure-P.5) was summoned by way of proclamation issued by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurgaon for 7.7.2009. The petitioner then filed an application for grant of pre-arrest bail before the Sessions Court at Gurgaon on 25.4.2009. Her arrest was stayed by the learned Sessions Court. In consequence of the interim stay, the petitioner has been appearing before the learned trial Court. However, vide order dated 2.3.2010 (Annexure-P.7) the application for grant of pre-arrest bail has been dismissed. In consequence of the interim bail granted by this Court on 25.3.2010, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurgaon. A reference has been made to the order dated 29.3.2010 (Annexure-P.8) whereby the bail bonds in the sum of `50,000/- furnished by the petitioner have been accepted and attested. At one stage, it was contended by the learned counsel for the respondent that the petitioner is a proclaimed offender. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted copies of the orders passed by the learned trial Court on 18.2.2009 (Annexure-P.9) and 18.3.2009 (Annexure-P.10). In terms of the said orders, only non-bailable warrants had been issued against the petitioner and no proceedings under Sections 82(2) or 82(3) and 82(4) Cr.P.C. were initiated against the Cr. Misc. No.M-8873 of 2010 [3] petitioner. In any case, in consequence of the interim bail granted by this Court on 25.3.2010, the petitioner has indeed put in appearance before the learned trial Court on 29.3.2010 which is evident from the order dated 29.3.2010 (Annexure-P.8). In the circumstances, the interim bail granted on 25.3.2010 by this Court is made absolute. The petitioner on her furnishing personal bond and surety to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court shall remain on bail. She shall, however, furnish an undertaking that she shall not absent herself from the trial of the case except with the prior permission of the trial Court. The criminal miscellaneous petition stands disposed of. January 12, 2010. (S.S. Saron) Judge *hsp*