HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1411 of 2011 ORDER: I.A.No. 442 of 2011 in O.S.No. 144 of 2000 has been moved by defendants 1 and 7 in the Suit seeking recall of P.W.1 for the purpose of cross-examining him inasmuch as the said P.W.1 has been allowed to bring on record four documents, which have not been marked in the suit. The said I.A. has been allowed with the following order: “Counter filed. Heard both sides. Petition is allowed on payment of costs of Rs.200/- to other side (P.W.1). Call on 28.2.2011 for payment.” To say the least, this order is not sustainable for want of reasons. It is elementary that the Court should have assigned one reason or the other. Without even assigning a single reason it ought not to have allowed the I.A. For this reason alone, the order passed on 25th February, 2011 is set aside as Sri C. Bala Gopal took notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 herein, who are petitioners in the I.A. The rest of the respondents are proforma respondents, therefore, for their presence the Civil Revision Petition need not be kept pending. As Sri C. Bala Gopal, rightly contends that providing an opportunity to cross-examine PW-1 may be an imperative necessity, for defendants 1 and 7, and the Court below ought to have assigned at least a single reason for the said purpose instead of barely concluding the order. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the order passed on 25.02.2011 is set aside. I.A is remanded back for fresh consideration. Registry to communicate a copy of this order within one week. ________________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J Date: 25.05.2011 Nn/Ka HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1411 of 2011 DATE: 25.5.2011