- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.5506 OF 2004 AND WRIT PETITION NO.5508 OF 2004 AND WRIT PETITION NO.5509 OF 2004 AND WRIT PETITION NO.5510 OF 2004 AND WRIT PETITION NO.5511 OF 2004 AND WRIT PETITION NO.5513 OF 2004 Mr.Chandrakant Bidkar for the Petitioner. Mr.M.H.Solkar, AGP for State. ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ ¦ ¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. ¦ DATED: 27TH APRIL,2005 P.C.: By these petitions the Petitioner - 2 - challenges the order passed by the School Tribunal granting an application filed by the Respondents for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 2. Condonation of delay is in the discretion of the Court. The Respondents are the teachers, whose services were terminated and therefore in the facts and circumstances of the case, the School Tribunal has condoned the delay so that the grievance of the teacher concerned can be considered by the School Tribunal on merits. I do not think that the order impugned resulted in any failure of justice. Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against that order cannot be entertained. Hence, all these Petitions are disposed of. ...