HI©HCOURT OF CHHATnS^ARH. 8ILASPUR (Sjngi®Bench^ Hon'bje Mr. Jystice Dhsr@ndra Mishra) W.P.(c) No.5Q50/2009 (Petition under Art-jci®226 of the Constitution of India) Petitjors&r Vs Respond^fits iWs Mahadev Transport Servlce, Throuqh ^Gnager Rajesh Kurnar Shuk!a (Power of Attorney Holder), S/o Late Shri H.L. Shukla, Aged obout 38 years, R/o High Court Road, Near Shiv TaJkies. 8ilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 1. Regjonal Transport Authority, BiJaspur (C6f) 2. Secretary, R€9?ona! Transport Au-thority, Biiaspur (C6) Present: Mr< Anshul R. Shrivastava, Advocate Mr* S. Thakur/ Panel Lawyer For the petitioner. For the respondents, ORAL ORDER (Passsd QR 30th NQysmbsr. 2009) 1. 5rieyance of the petitioner is that on 28.5.2009 the petitioner has moved the appiication of Annexure-P/l before the respondent No.l for grant of regular stage carriage perrnit on th^ route Balco to Sarangarh via Korba, Champa, Birra, and one return trip, however, till date the same has not been decided By respondent NoJ. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this petition rsay be disposed of with direction to respondent No.l to decid'e the application of Annexure PM1 expeditiousi'y. 3. Learned counseJ for the State submitted that appiication of Annexure" P"l shali be decided within a period of 8 weeks from th©date of production of a certified copy of this order. 4. In view of the submissions rnade by tearned counsel for the parties, this petjtion is disposed of with direction to respondent No,l to decide the appiication (Annexure P-1) within 8 weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order by the petitioner* Sd/- DhirendraMisbra Judge 9i