C.W.P. No. 20236 of 2006 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 20236 of 2006 Date of Decision: December 19, 2006 Pardeep Kumar …..Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. Present:- Mr. R.C. Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioner -.- VINEY MITTAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has approached this Court challenging the appointment of respondent No.5- Yogesh Kumar, as Guest Teacher. It has been claimed that the aforesaid appointment which has been made by Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Khizrabad, District Yamunanagar- respondent No.4 was contrary to the policy of the State Government and as such was not sustainable. C.W.P. No. 20236 of 2006 [2] Mr. R.C. Chatrath, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has contended that for the redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has already filed a representation dated November 22, 2006 (annexure P-3) which remains unresponded so far. Learned counsel states that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to take a final decision on the representation filed by the petitioner. In this view of the matter, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Khizrabad, District Yamunanagar- respondent No.4 to take a final decision on the aforesaid representation (annexure P.3) within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is received, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and respondent No.5 and by passing a detailed and speaking order. A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. (VINEY MITTAL) JUDGE December 19, 2006 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE