IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20199 of 2010 AJIT KUMAR SINGH SON OF SRI CHANDRAMA PRASAD SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14.7.2010 Supplementary affidavit filed today be kept on the record. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 328 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the first information report the allegation against an unknown driver is that he gave the informant some drinks, on account of which he became faint and thereafter he looted away his belongings. The petitioner was put on test identification parade and he was identified by the informant stating that it was the petitioner, who had given him the intoxicating drink. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it positively within a period of nine months since the matter is serious. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )