cp158.10 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ CP/158/2010 In CP/126/2009 LATA @ LATIKA ANANTRAO JOSHI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prashant Deshmukh And R.J. Godbole. AGP for Respondent(s): Mr.D.V. Tele ... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. Dated: July 08, 2011 ... Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2 On 28th September, 2010 this Court had extensively heard this contempt petition. The Collector, Osmanabad was directed to remain present before this Court on 14th October, 2010 at 10.30 a.m. The Collector did file affidavit stating therein that the vacancies which cp158.10 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ were filled in, were from reserved category. The order dated 28th September, 2010 was passed after hearing all the parties and this Court was about to dispose of the contempt petition. However, the petitioner sought time for filing rejoinder. The Counsel for the petitioner states that rejoinder affidavit has been filed. It is an admitted position that there was ban to the recruitment from general category. The learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from his client, makes a statement that now the State Government has lifted the ban and therefore, the respondents should consider the claim of the petitioner in terms of order dated 5th August, 2009 passed in Contempt Petition No.126 of 2009. cp158.10 3 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ 3 The petitioner is at liberty to make such representation to the respondents. The respondents will consider the same, in accordance with law. However, in my opinion, no further orders are required to be passed in this contempt petition. Hence, the contempt petition stands disposed of. Notice stands discharged. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) PLK/*