IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL SECOND APPEAL No. 196 of 1998 NARPAT SINGH V/S MAN MAL & ORS None present for the appellant / petitioner Mr. BC MEHTA, for the respondent Date of Order : 20.10.2006 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Nobody appears for the appellant. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in default. It may also be observed that learned counsel for the respondent has filed an application way back on 8.2.2001 after giving copy to the learned counsel for the appellant. It is contended in the application that in view of the facts mentioned therein, the appeal is required to be dismissed. I find from the order sheets that vide order dt. 1.7.1998 record was called and interim stay was granted on the condition of the appellant regularly depositing the rent. Thereafter on 16.12.1998 the arguments were heard, and order was reserved. However, on 7.8.2000 the matter was released. Thereafter it has not been heard. It is contended in the application that the appellant has not deposited any amount even after interim order. In my view, in view of the above facts also, the appeal is required to be dismissed. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /Sushil/