C.R. No.1676 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.1676 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.10.2010 Ram Singh ……Petitioner VERSUS Bagha Ram @ Bhagirath ……Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- Present: Mr. H.S. Hooda, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mohit Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. L.N. Verma, Advocate for the respondent. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 8.9.2009 passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Sirsa as well as order dated 25.1.2010 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Sirsa, whereby application moved by the plaintiff-respondent herein under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. was allowed and defendant-petitioner herein was restrained not to dispos- C.R. No.1676 of 2010 -2- sess the plaintiff-respondent and not to create third party interest dur- ing the pendency of the suit. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for the parties state that pre- sent petition be disposed of with their consent in the following terms:- i) Both the parties shall maintain status-quo qua the pos- session and nature of the property and none of the party shall create third party interest during the pendency of the suit. ii) Learned trial Court is directed to decide the suit itself preferably within two years. 3. Present petition stands disposed of with the consent of learned Counsel for the parties in the above terms. ( ALOK SINGH ) 27th October, 2010 JUDGE ashish