IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.21558 of 2010 RAM ACHAL SINGH @ AMIT KUMAR SINGH son of Sri Rang Singh Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 20.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under section 393 of the Indian Penal Code. Even though the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report but the informant continued his enquiry about the identity of the accused persons and targeted the petitioner on account of some information having been received. Considering that the petitioner is directly involved in the present case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case shall not be bifurcated for the purpose of commitment/charge. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)