IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No. M-23450 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: September 15, 2011 Kirandeep Kaur and others ... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr.K.S.Boparai, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.J.S.Bhullar, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab for respondent – State. Sony Singh – respondent No.2 with his counsel Ms.Priyanka Sharma, Advocate. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) The petitioners, by filing this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, have sought quashing of First Information Report (for short 'FIR) No.205 dated July 31st, 2010 (Annexure P1) registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506/120-B of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') in Police Station Samrala, District Ludhiana. Accused – petitioner No.1 Kirandeep Kaur is wife of Sony Singh – respondent No.2/ complainant. Sony Singh has appeared in person and stated at bar that he has compromised the matter with the petitioners with the intervention of the relatives and friends. Compromise- deed (Annexure P2) has been placed on record. He also states that there is no ill-will left. Indeed, the dispute between the parties was of personal nature. In view of this, there should not be any impediment in allowing the parties to compromise the matter. Support to this view can be had from the authority 'Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab' 2008 (2) RCR (Criminal) 429, wherein, Hon'ble Supreme Court has ruled that in such type of cases, where the dispute is of personal nature, Court should ordinarily, accept the compromise. In view of the above, the petition is accepted, FIR No.205 dated July 31st, 2010 (Annexure P1) registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506/120-B of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') in Police Station Samrala, District Ludhiana and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed. September 15, 2011 ( NAWAB SINGH ) `gian' JUDGE