IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16270 of 2011 Bijay Kumar Sarogi Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 02. 21.09.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. By the impugned order dated 11.07.2011 passed in title suit no.72 of 2005 by Sub Judge II, Munger, substitution application filed by widow of defendant no.2, Swami Anand Murti who was Registrar of Bihar Yoga Bharti, Ganga Darshan has been allowed. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that after considering the submission made by the learned counsel which is being raised before this Court, the learned Court below passed the order finding that defendant no.2 was added as party-defendant in his individual capacity. However, whether the substituted respondent will now represent the Yoga Bharti or she will claim independent title that is a matter to be decided in the suit itself. In such view of the matter, the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that she cannot be substituted in place of Registrar of Yoga Bharti is not acceptable at this stage. I, therefore, find no reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. Saurabh (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)