IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.808 of 2009 PRASIDH NARAYAN VERMA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 02. 10.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. On the own showing of the petitioner, what he essentially seeks to question is a Title Deed executed by his own father aggrieved by denial of his perceived share in the property. It is acknowledged that the petitioner has already filed a Title Suit No. 438 of 2006. All questions including that of Stamp Duty, Court Fee etc. and the validity of the sale deed itself can well be examined in the Title Suit. When a proper civil remedy is available and has been resorted to also there is no occasion for this Court to exercise power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Nothing in this order shall be construed as or be deemed an observation on the merits of the matter which is to be decided in the Title Suit also in accordance with law. The application stands dismissed. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)