@ (“f/’lmZ/ @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH’ , AT BILAS‘PUR w..P. [C] N0.§£L%S.-/2008 PETITIGNER f Anandram Ganda S/o Pumnjc‘ Ganda ’ gzw y P.O Loharsi,’l‘hana Shivarinarayan, Tan Dismaanjgiwhammmm VERSUS / 1. State of’Chhattisgrh Through the Secretary of Depart- ment of Revenue, D.K;S.Rhawan Raipur I C.G.] / 2. The Collector, Collectorate Janjg‘r — ‘Champa [~C.G.] REcawzg -C0PY e / ,y \0 V\O’X 3. The Sub Dmsxorml O$eer CI EEK '5’“ “(:I B".’3‘.SPU‘R Tab-Janjgr champa , Distt. Janjgr - .Champa i C.G.] Tile Land Acqmsmon Om Hasdeo meet , Janjgir Distt. Janjgir - Champa -[ eel] PETI'HON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONWON OF INDIA / t v ir ortignof iot bearinu Khasra No 14 admeasurina 0 64 acres f’or roiem of Khors: Minor LohaiSI Boarda Kamta oa proiect Viiiaue Lh oars: Dit isric JCh anigir-ampa hn Thakur iearned Pane! awver appearing for the State reyirki i . i on the averment mad the dawt t 4 O8 2010 bts s e in affi daed O sumi / hat the claim 0f the netitioner as been acceed b te tate an 1 t p h pd d thhby he etitioner. shall e mwed an aiternate .ian in e'ear i lace, from where the land has‘been acquired «win a petoé p ith td‘ i nt of 3 mehs. n View oft forein, accordin o learne counsel for t i gog g t d he etitinr; nothing survives} for adjucaion n s maer a le ta sge. Ai th tti i r ccordingy, e writ peion s dispased‘o Sd- ish K. Agnihotri uge (P s dan 10 day of Nevember 2010) Case of the petitioner is that the ‘St‘ate auhorities hae acquedia i 2 p p § 2’ p Rd at i i N S L ig t h pt y h S d, poe dit i thi tt t tit t z / ,Sat ' Jd