WP(C) 4263/2008 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HN SARMA Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mrs VL Sinha, learned State counsel appearing for the official respondents and Mr. B. Rahman who appears by filing caveat on behalf of the respondent No.8. By this application, the petitioner has prayed for cancellation of the order dat ed 5.9.08 fixing the election of the Annual General Meeting of the Lalpool S.S. Ltd on 25.9.08 on the ground that the nomination of the private respondent No. 8, Mr. Shamser Ali has been illegally accepted though he is defaulter. Whether t he respondent No.8 is a defaulter or not is disputed questions of fact. That a part, the election of the Society not having been held for the last 9 years, the share holder of the society approached this court for a direction to hold the A nnual General Meeting of the Lalpool S.S. Ltd and this court vide order dated 30 .07.08 passed in WP ( c) No. 3245/08 directed the Registrar of the Co-operative Socities to take appropriate steps for holding the election and the AGM. The petitioner will always get the opportunity even in the event if the Responde nt No.8 is elected to raise the grievance before the Registrar of Co-operative S ocieties without whose approval the result of the election could not be acted up on in terms for the Rule 27 of the Assam Co-operative Societies Rules. Mr. Rahman appearing for the caveator/respondent No.8 however, strenuously conte nds that the private respondent No.8 is not the defaulter as alleged and he has been wrongly described as defaulter and to this effect he has furnished certain documents to which I am not inclined to go into the same at this stage. As the petitioner would be entitled to raise his grievance at the appropriate st age if the respondent No.8 is elected, I do not consider it necessary to keep t his writ petition pending any more and is disposed of by giving liberty to the p etitioner as indicated above. With this order, the writ petition is disposed of.