IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2008 / 14TH POUSHA 1929 RP.No. 1232 of 2007(C) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.23754/2007 Dated 14/09/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/3RD RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------------- ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, KSEB, KOLLAKADAVU, ALAPUZHA DIST. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER/RESPONDENTS ----------------------------------- 1. ANNAPOORNESWARI DEVI TEMPLE, TANNIKKAL DEVASWOM, KUTTAMPEROOR, MANNAR, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY N.RAJASEKHARAN. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, COLLECTORATE, ALAPPUZHA. 4. SMT. VIJAYAMMA, CHEMPILETHU VEEDU, KUTTAMPEROOR, MANNAR, ALAPPUZHA DIST. R1 BY ADV. SRI. SANTHAN V NAIR & SRI.A. ANISH BAL THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------- R.P. NO. 1232 OF 2007 in W.P.C. No. 23754 OF 2007 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of January, 2008 O R D E R I do not find any ground to review the judgment because standing counsel for KSEB submitted that petitioner in the WPC has not sought for conversion of weather proof cable to underground cable. Even though counsel for KSEB submitted that there is general instruction by KSEB against giving connection through underground cable for fear of theft of power, I do not find any justification to accept this argument because it is the duty of the KSEB officials to ensure that theft does not take place. Review Petition is therefore dismissed. (C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge kk 2