Petitioner : Smt. Dev Kuwar Bai D/o- Johrik Sahu Aged about 59 years, Permanent Gangman, R/o Vitlage- chiddo P.0. Patargaon Tehsil & District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus 1. 2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Sub Division Offlcer, Sub-Division No.2, C.G. PWD, PWD Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) iinaie Bench: Hon'bte Justice Shr LSatish K. Agnihofri Present : Shri Anoop Majumdar.counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Diwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the State. (Passed on11m June, 2007) 1. By this petition, the petitioner, who hce worked as Sargman (permanent) Sub-Division RqjntOTdgaon, Oistrict - Rfljnandgaon, seeks a r-elief that the petitioner being per-manent gangman be retired at the age of 62 years in accordonce with the ChhcrH'isgar'h Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhiniyam, 1967 (for short the Act, 1967 ) read with Fundamento! Ruie (for short 'F.R.')56. 2. The indisputable faets are that the petitioner was employed ©angman (permanent) Sub-Division Rcynandgaon, District - Rcynandgaon and she was retired from service w.e.f. 31.05.2007 on attaining the age of 60 years vide order dated 2.4.2003 and 24.4.2003. Aecording to learned counsel for the petitioner; the petitioner attained the status of permanent employee, as defined undep Rule 2(c) of the Chhattisgarh (Workeharged and Contingency Paid Ernpbyees) Pension Rules, 1979 (for short the Rules, 1979 ) framed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India. After having attained the status of the permment employee the petitioner wouid retire on attaining the cge of 62 yesrs on superannuation under The provisiona of the Act, 1967. 3. Lewned counsel appearing for the petitioner wouid submit thort' the case of the petitionec is squorely covered by the decision of this Court passed on 4th January. 2007 in W.P. No. 108/2005 (Sovind Vs. State of Chhattisgarh &others) and other connected matters. 4. Learned counse! appearing for the respondents/State does not dispute the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. i, Accordingly, the petitioner, who is permanent gangman, is entitled to retire on attaining the age of 62 yecrs in accordence with the Act, 1967. The petition is occordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. Indu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge