1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10902 OF 2004 Yatin Pundalik Kandalkar .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.B.G.Tangsali with Swapnil Pednekar for petitioner Mr.R.M.Patne, A.G.P.for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. Vacation Judge. DATE : JANUARY 3, 2005. DATE : JANUARY 3, 2005. DATE : JANUARY 3, 2005. P.C. . Mr.Tangsali, learned Counsel appearing for petitioner states that petitioner will file an undertaking with the Regional Transport Office that the vehicle (Truck bearing Registration 2 No.MH-07-432) will not ply in Mumbai city. On furnishing such an undertaking within a period of one week from today, respondents shall release vehicle detained pursuant to the seizure memo Exh.H dated 27th December 2004. 2. Even otherwise, in my view, this is a matter similar to the one at Exh.G and, therefore, is covered by the order dated 15th December 2004 passed by the Division Bench of this Court. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order. *****