THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33036 of 2010 Dated 15th February, 2011 Between: Vaman Rao and others …Petitioners And The District Collector, Nizamabads District, Nizamabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri B.Gangadhar Counsel for respondent No.3: AGP for Panchayat Raj Counsel for respondent No.5: Sri P.Raghavender Reddy The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the impugned Memo Notices issued by the 5th respondent vide No.243 to 248/GPM/2010 dt.23.12.2010 directing the petitioners herein to stop the construction activities in Sy.No.3 of Madnoor Village and Mandal, Nizamabad District during the subsistence of the injunction orders granted in I.A.No.213 of 2010 in O.S.No.48 of 2010 dt.21.12.2010 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge at Bichkunda, as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust and in utter violation of principles of natural justice, besides violative of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside Lr.No.3312/2010 dt.07.12.2010 alleged to have been issued by the 4th respondent cancelling the pattas issued to the petitioners (the copy of the same was not served to the petitioners).” In view of the admitted fact that the petitioners have filed O.S.No.48 of 2010 in the Court of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Bichkunda and obtained interim injunction against the respondents in this writ petition, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition, as the petitioners cannot avail parallel remedies in respect of the same dispute. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to pursue the said suit. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.Nos.41954 of 2010 and 2051 of 2011are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 15th February, 2011 VGB