IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM and THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION NO.10852 of 2005 Between: Smt. Mahmooba Begum, W/o. Shaik Bande Ali, R/o. Chotapul, Yaqutpura, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The Station House Officer, Reinbazar Police Station, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Twin Cities, Hyderabad. 3. The Director General of Police, Govt.of A.P., Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order, direction, or a writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to call for records and remarks from the Respondents herein relating to illegal detention of the son of the Petitioner herein, Viz., Shaik Khaja Moinuddin in the Reinbazar Police Station, and obtaining his signatures and thumb impressions on blank papers by the police, and mischievously converting the said papers into a complaint and registered as Crime No.71 of 2005 under Sections 384 and 506 of I.P.C. against one Chota Mohd. Pahelwan, who never visited the house of the Petitioner herein nor threatened the inmates of the Petitioner's house, and to pass appropriate orders directing the concerned authorities to enquire into the matter in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: TELEGRAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM And THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION NO.10852 of 2005 ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Dr Justice G.Yethirajulu) A telegram issued by the petitioner was taken cognizance by this Court and notices were issued to the respondents. The petitioner alleged that the first respondent forcibly took away the detenu namely Shaik Khaja Moinuddin and illegally detained in the Police Station and the petitioner subsequently came to know that a crime covered by Crime No.71 of 2005 was registered against the detenu for the offences punishable under Sections 384 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned Government Pleader for Home submitted that the alleged detenu was not detained by the first respondent and he is required in connection with the above crime and as and when he is available, he would be apprehended and produced before the Court. In the light of the submissions made on behalf of the respondents, no further orders are warranted. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. __________________ (GODA RAGHURAM, J) _________________ (G.YETHIRAJULU, J) 3rd May 2005 RRB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //True Copy// SECTION OFFICER Copy To: 1. The Station House Officer, Reinbazar Police Station, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Twin Cities, Hyderabad. 3. The Director General of Police, Govt.of A.P., Hyderabad. 4. Two CCs to G.P. for Home, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 5. Two CD copies.