1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION(LODG.) NO. 96 OF 2007 IN APPEAL NO. 265 OF 2001 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1745 OF 1998 Nini Subhash Gulla. .... Petitioner. V/s. Marwadi Sammelan and Ors. .... Respondents. ....... Ms. Saloni Desai i/b. M.P. Vashi & Associates for the Petitioner. Mr. N.M. Ganguli for Respondents 1 to 6. ........ CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 5TH MARCH 2008. P.C. :- At the hearing of the Contempt Petition, Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Counsel appearing for Respondents 1 to 6 respectively have placed on the record a copy of the order of the 2 Supreme Court dated 18th February 2008 in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) Nos. 126 and 127 of 2008. The Supreme Court has recorded that the dispute between the parties had been settled and directed that a copy of the consent terms be kept on record. Having regard to the fact that the dispute has been settled, Counsel appearing for the Petitioner has submitted that it would not be expedient in the interest of justice to pursue these Contempt proceedings any further. Having regard to the circumstance that the dispute has been settled, as recorded in the order of the Supreme Court dated 18th February 2008, it would in my view not be expedient to pursue these Contempt proceedings. The Contempt Petition shall accordingly stand disposed of. ------