I 29 # . %. 27.09.2010 Present: Mr. Vijay K. Sehgal, Adv. for the petitioners with petitioner No. 1 in person. Mr. M.P. Singh, AFP for the State with SI Sunil, P.S. Uttam Nagar. Mr. Ramjan Ali 85 Mr. Dharmender Giri, complainants in person. +Crl. M.C. No. 3085/2010 * On the complaint of respondent No. 2 and 3 FIR No. 84/2010 under Sectionis 420/406/34 IPC was registered against the petitioners in the police station Uttam Nagar. Now the petitioners and respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have settled their disputes amicably. In terms of settlement petitioners have given 'No Objection Certificate' for transfer of the three-wheeler scooters, involved in the ~EIR,_jn _&e name of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 as weU for deletion of endorsement of h5rpothecation registered with the Road Transport Authority. Both the parties shall be bound by the terms of settlement as recorded in the compromise deed, which has been placed on record. Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that no other documents in respect of three-wheeler scooters involved in this case are with them as the same were Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified destroyed in a fire in the office premises of petitioner No. 1. It is further stated that the petitioners shall not claim any right qua the three-wheeler scooters involved in the FIR. In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, I am of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served by compelling the parties to continue to litigate a protracted trial. In the larger interest I quash the FIR No. 84/2010 under Sections 420/406/34 IPC registered against the petitioners in the police station Uttam Nagar and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Copy of the order be given dasti to the parties. September 27, 2010 ~rb— - ^K. PATHAK,J.