g W? wm §' t TH ON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH A BISPUR (c w Eq/ .P. (S) No. \ V but ijay Kumar Yadav, aged ao 3 'v,/ 9 years, S/o Shri Brijlal Yada wking as Assist Ill, Or ant Grade- R/ Jha r, Dstf. o uniapra, Kanke i K () anker C.G. Shil g t us Kumar Sahu, aed abou 32 ys, S/ hri ear o S Prasa a Asiant GradIII, sst e- Shlpa, Distt. eetaaar Nth B Kk (.) or aster aner C.G ul Kalir Khn, aed about ears, o S y S/ hri Peer Mohammed Kh R/ tt, an, o ViHage Patod, VDis Kk (CG) aner .. Rdy , g ut 37 amaal Nishad aed abo y S/ i. Gdh Rrn ears, o Shr oran a Patod, Kk (G.) aner, Distt. Kanker C. Jdh agis as R/o orkin wg Kr, anke illa V‘lge IN E H T LA s) /:1. d Shu, Abd g a g 42 R/o VS ERSU tate of Chhatfisgarh Tg y & hrouh Secretar, Revenue Rehaato bilitin DKS B G.) f.. hawan, Raipur (C. RS ESPONDENT Dn} epartmet The lecion Officer, Kanker, NOrt aster Kanker C.G.) Et h Citr c t oieco um Distric RIT‘PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE ONSTITUION F INI S ~ /1 B ( W C O DA Petitioners Resmndem WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present :- HIGH couRr oscHHAmseARH AT eILAsPUR wan Permon (s) No 1m oi: p011 Wjay Kumar Yadav & Others Shte of Chhattisgarh 8: Another T 552i’k Leamed GBunsel appearing for the petitioners seeks a dirocEon to regularize the service of the petitloners, as they have been engaged in Census work, wlthout any scrutiny, directly, pursuant to the oirouIarrY dated 16.1 .2007 (Annexure P-1 8). It is further Informed that the Collector, Diarict North Bastar, Kanker, had already Issued an advertisement inviting applicatton for appointment on various posts. The petitioners have also made applications. The petitioners should be given preferenoe in appointment. At this stage, no direction can be gramd. The petitioners have made application and if there is a provision for grant of preference, the same shall be considered, in accordance with law. When no selection process has been completed and appointment has been made, the petition is premature, and as such, no direction at this juncture can be issued. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismisae d. ‘3hok M P. Sdl- Shri D.N. Prajapati, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Dy. Advocate General for the State. ORDER {ORALI (Passed on 9‘" day of March. 201 1) V SATISH K. ANGN'H-IORI Judge