IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5858 of 2009 Between: The Revenue Divisional Officer-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Kurnool ... PETITIONER AND U. Seshi Reddy (died) and others ... RESPONDENTS ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 19-08-2009 in E.A.No.92 of 2009 in E.P.No.21 of 2006 in O.P.No.4173 of 1991 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Nandikotkur, Kurnool district. 2. The learned Government Pleader for Arbitration would submit that the calculation memo filed by the petitioner-Revenue Divisional Officer-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Kurnool is in accordance with law. But, however, erroneously the learned Judge came to the conclusion that Full Satisfaction cannot be recorded. 3. On the contrary, the learned counsel representing the respondents would submit that the judgment debtor is due some more amount and hence, the order made by the learned Judge is not in accordance with law. 4. Heard the learned counsel. Perused the order under challenge. 5. When a different stand had been taken both by both the parties, the petitioner contending that the calculation memo filed by the petitioner is in accordance with law and Full Satisfaction to be recorded and on the contrary the respondents contending otherwise, it is the bounden duty of the learned Judge to record reasons of appreciation of the rival contentions which can be advanced by the learned counsel representing the petitioner as well as the respondents. 6. Hence, the order under challenge is hereby set aside and the matter is remitted to the learned Senior Civil Judge, Nandikotkur to give opportunity to both the parties, record the reasons and after hearing both the parties decide the matter afresh, in accordance with law. 7. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed to the extent indicated above. There shall be no order as to costs. 8. Let the matter be decided as expeditiously as possible at any rate within a period of three months ___________________ P.S. NARAYANA, J March 30, 2010. PN THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5858 of 2009 March 30, 2010