IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 5827 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.7.2011 Paramjit Singh ..Petitioner. Vs. State of Punjab ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present : Mr.Manoj Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Abhishek Chautala, AAG Punjab. Rajesh Bindal, J. While issuing notice of motion on 24.2.2011, this Court noticed following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner: “Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner is running an institution by the name of Prince and Princess which is attached with the International Career Academy (ICA). The said institute provides practical training for jobs at the Airports. After completion of training, the performance of the students is observed by the complany itself. The complainants-Saroj Bala and Rajvinder Singh, it is submitted, approached the petitioner for tranining and employment in Industrial Exposure for which a fee of Rs.1.25 lacs was settled. After training both the complainants were selected for industrial Exposure Training Operation with Taj Sats Air Catering, New Delhi. A certificate in this regard in respect of both the complainants is placed on record as (Annexure P-1). The complainants-Saroj Bala and Rajvinder Singh got training of Industrial Exposure through Air Track Crl. Misc. No. M- 5827 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Aviation with Taj Sats Air Catering, New Delhi from 12.2.2010 to 11.4.2010. Petitioner No.1 was issued certificate (Anexure P-2) and petitioner No.2 was issued certificate (Annexure P-4) by Taj Sats Air Catering, New Delhi regarding their training. The complainants gave no due certificates (Annexure P-3 and P-5) expressing their satisfaction with the course and that they had no dues left. The complainant-Saroj Bala was thereafter given appointment by Delhi Select Service Hospitality Private Limited vide letter dated 14.5.2010 (Annexure P-6). However, she left her job after some time. It is submitted that an amount of Rs.25,000/- was payable to the petitioner out of the fee of Rs.1,25,000/- that had been settled for imparting training. Therefore, the petitioner issued legal notices (Annexure P-7 and P-8) to the complainants and as a counter blast the complainants lodged the complaint on 27.8.2010 alleging that they had given money for getting them jobs. On the basis of said complaint, FIR has been registered on 3.12.2010. It is submitted that amount in fact is due from the complainants for which legal notices dated 1.7.2010 (Annexures P-7 and P-8) have been issued.” It is not in dispute that petitioner has joined investigation. Considering the totality of circumstances, interim bail granted to the petitioner on 24.2.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. ( Rajesh Bindal ) 13.7.2011 Judge Meenu