ELTEE EEGH C’OURT QF CHEATHSGARH fxT BIUESPUR €¥rit ?et£ti011 E) I 4&5; 2&34 ?ETITIONERS : 1. Keslhav Ram Salam S; a Shri J.R.Sa1am, agec{ ahaui' 45 yeam, a, u 1". .¢ \§3§%§k warking a3 Jkssistarnf Teacher at " Iv?” ¢ Kanya. Aghram, Deonga, R; 0 @« \Nzxq a“ I‘mlipara, Kanker (cam. C§i§0& L. Jage Ram Badhy $g’ c: Shri Farat. ée‘ .b " ?‘ Ram, aged about 43 yearsx‘ wcrking as a . Q‘ é" f" Aaaistaxit Tcaachar at Baiak Ashram, J\ Fidia Kat, Rf o Viuage a11c1 Past— Kanhan Puri, Tahsil- Kazlker, Bisdx‘ict— Kankar €C,G.}. Rajkumar Chat Sf :3 Shri jaiial (than agea ahimt 35 years, warkiiig as £sgi$tant Teaehsar, Kamya é‘ghram, Duanga, R} o iimaga- Ellarn‘ Tala? FG3£~ Dakala, Talmil—Chaxama, Estxict— Kankar (CIGJ. Jam-an Ram Teta (writterx as Jahat Ram} aged abeut 46 years, S/ a Shri Sripratap Singh Teta, Worldng as A$$istant Teashar at Balak A$hram, Chote Tonda, Beda, R/ o Village— Bhodia, Post- Bhan Beda, Tahail- Bhamlpfatappur, District— Kankar (C.G.). 5‘ mgalal 3ahu, S} a Shri Mehatter Ram Salm, aged ahout 34 years, working a3 Agsi$tant Teacher at Balak Ashraln, Thuthuli, RI a Village—Gila -. '. mm Hula, Poat—Charbhata, TahSil— Charamak Disztrict— Kanker (C.G.). 6. Kanta Ram Nishad, SI o Chaim Ram Nishadb aged abnut .38 years, Warldng as Asaistant Teacher at Balak Ashram , Bade Tonda, Bada, R] o Village and P0$t~ Jaisa Karra, Talmil- Charama, Digtrict— Kalaker (C.G.}, - Versus- RESPONDENTS /1’. State of Chhattiagarh ‘V’ thraugh the Secretary Adim Jaiti Tafha Anusuchit Jati Vikas'. Vibhag, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Dixector, Adim Jaiti Tatha Anmsuchit Jati Vikas Vibhag, Raipur (C.G.). Co11ector (Adiva$hi Vikas silakha), Jagdalpur (am. 4. Assistant Director, Adimlaiti Tatha Axmsuchi’c iatl Vxkas Vibhag, CoBectarate. Building, IagdalpmiEmer) (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE ml22? OF THE CON$TITUTIGN OF INDIA FQR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS! PROHIBITION} CERTIORARI ETQOR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. {0, Details of the petition. 1. PARTICULAR OF THE PETITIONERS : A3 year cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS : As per catme title. XI HC 22 mg EW,W,W am m HPNo I46§2Wf m mam mmmw‘a WM %€H&1§R $a$<wanéw 05.6.2004 Shri Vinod Shrivastava, .adv311c€ Cepy. Shri Jaiswal submits thz Vick: orders dated 04.7.2003, 3O Copies of the orders have, 136cm P-4, He. further submits that 8J1 months back, but they have nc t the petitioners were transferred 6.2003, (-37.2003, and 21.8.2003. Annexures vide Annexures P—1 to hough They were transferred 10— 1 1 that Q16 elactianS to the LsgislJ >t yet been relieved on me ground counsel submits that the transfe If the election to the Vit and the tranSfei‘ orderi; are net _ ill net relieving the petitioners V within 3 weeks. Wlth this observation MAmwb¢v Coneequentlv, M. W . P _’ !.A.o340:/G4 stand disposed. of. QC. as per rules. Govt. Advocate for the State 011 Learned r ordere have not beer}. carlcelied. .han Sabha has already been held caricelled then there is no reaeon and now they would be relieved 7" this neutron 1‘; (haposed ofmm gw beg/04 1 A Or 39/04 and \W I Sdl- Fakhruddin V z Judge itive Asgembly are due. [113% ifm} 8hri Prashant Jayaswal, courasel for the petitioners.