HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2936 of 2010 Dated: 27-07-2010 Between: Mekala Ravi & others. … Petitioners And Uppuluri Srinath & others. … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2936 of 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the defendants in the suit in O.S.No.299 of 2009, aggrieved by the order, dated 7th of May 2010, passed by the learned II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal, in I.A.No.677 of 2010. Respondent/plaintiffs have filed the suit in O.S.No.299 of 2009 on the file of the learned II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal. According to them, they are in possession of the residential plots in question, covered by Survey Nos.377 and 378 of Matwada Revenue Village, near Doctors Colony, Warangal. On the ground that there is interference by the petitioners herein, they obtained injunction orders in I.A.No.456 of 2009. After issuing notice to the petitioners, who are respondents in the aforesaid application, the application filed by the respondent/plaintiffs was allowed by an order, dated 7th of May 2010, by the learned II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal. On the ground that the petitioners are CPM party workers and they are still resisting the actions, respondents have filed I.A.No.677 of 2010 for grant of Police aid. In view of the orders passed in I.A.No.456 of 2009, the Court below, by impugned order, dated 7th of May 2010, allowed the application filed by the respondents. In this Civil Revision Petition, it is contended by the learned Counsel Sri C. Damodar Reddy, appearing for petitioners that under the guise of injunction orders obtained by the respondents with regard to the land in Survey Nos.377 and 378, they are entering into the land owned by the Government, covered by Survey No.352. The said argument of the learned counsel cannot be dealt with in this revision petition, which is filed only against the orders in I.A.No.677 of 2010. Under the guise of injunction orders granted by the Court below in I.A.No.456 of 2009, if the respondents are trying to enter into the land covered by Sy.No.352, it is for the petitioners to file appropriate application in the suit, but on the aforesaid ground, they cannot assail the validity of the orders, dated 7th May 2010, passed in I.A.No.677 of 2010. As much as the orders in I.A.No.456 of 2009 are obtained by the respondents against the petitioners, by which, the Court below has granted injunction orders in favour of petitioners, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the trial Court, giving Police aid. For the aforesaid reasons, the revision is devoid of merit and it is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 27th July 2010 ajr