IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.6603 of 2010 Date of Decision : April 09, 2010. Gian Chand .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.S.Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a mandamus for the release of his retiral benefits including the pension etc. The petitioner has served the department for 12 years, 10 months and 20 days before he resigned due to certain domestic compulsion. As the petitioner was denied the retiral benefits, he filed a Civil Suit which was dismissed by the Civil Court on 31.5.1995, however, his first appeal was decreed by the 1st Appellate Court vide judgment dated 9.1.1998 which has been further upheld by this Court vide order dated 16.9.2008 in RSA No.2433 of 1998 (Annexure P-1). Notwithstanding the decree passed in favour of the petitioner, the respondents have denied the retiral benefits to him. C.W.P.No .6603 of 2010 2 In my considered view, the petitioner has got an effective remedy to seek execution of the Court decree already passed in his favour. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an execution application before the competent authority at the earliest. It is directed that as soon as the execution application is filed by the petitioner, the Executing Court shall take effective steps in accordance with law to see that the benefits flowing from the Civil Court decree are granted to the petitioner at the earliest. Disposed of Dasti. April 09, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE