IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30918 of 2010 PAPPU VERMA, SON OF BADHO SAO, R/O VILLAGE- FATEHPUR, P.S. FATEHPUR, DISTRICT-GAYA. --PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY 2 17.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named accused in this case who only is owner of the vehicle which was being driven by co- accused Guddu, who has already been granted regular bail. There is absolutely nothing against the petitioner nor has any presence, as stated. Also there is nothing in the statement of the victim under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in Fatehpur P.S. Case no. 72 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present before the court below on each and every date for one year or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad