BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twelfth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.11969 of 2011 1 VALARMATHI 2 VEERANAN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NOS. 4 & 5 Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION USILAMPATTI, MADURAI DISTRICT CR.NO.17/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. J.SELVAM Advocate For Respondent : M/S. A.RAMAR Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos. 4 and 5 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498(a) Section 4 of TNDP Act, in Crime No.17 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that on the basis of complaint given by one Annalakshmi the case has been registered under Sections 498(a) Section 4 of TNDP Act, stating that the marriage was performed on 25.01.2011 between the first accused and the de-facto complainant and the case has been registered on 31.01.2011 and the complaint was given on 06.09.2011. The first petitioner is the sister-in-law of the de-facto complainant and the second petitioner is the husband of the first petitioner. He further submits that the petitioners are living at a separate house and they are not at all connected with the commission of offence and hence, they prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.Refuting the same, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) would submit that all the accused joint together and demanded 15 sovereign of gold and money and tortured the de-facto complainant and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides the marriage was performed between the petitioner and the de-facto complainant on 25.01.2011, since it is a love marriage and that has https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ been registered on 31.01.2011, the first petitioner is the sister-in- law and the second petitioner is the husband of the sister-in-law of the de-facto complainant, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Usilampatti, Madurai District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 12/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I USILAMPATTI, MADURAI DIST 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION USILAMPATTI, MADURAI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. J.SELVAM Advocate SR.No.30848 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11969 of 2011 Date :12/09/2011 SMA/14.9.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/