IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND JUNE 2011 / 1ST ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 16796 of 2011(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- LEELAMMA THOMAS W/O.JOSEPH THOMAS,NALPATHANCHIL CHIRAYIL HOUSE, RUBY NAGAR P.O.,CHANGANCHERRY PIN-686103 BY ADV. SRI.R.SANTHOSH BABU RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF SURVEY AND LAND RACORDS, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, KOTTAYAM-686001 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS, KOTTAYAM-686001 4. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, CHANGANACHERRY--686103 5. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VAZHAPPALY EAST,CHANGANACHERRY-686103 BY GOVT. PLEADER ADV. SMT. RAJASREE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 16796 of 2011(Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF TITLE DEED/SALE DEED NO.2245/92 OF SRO, CHANGANACHERRY IN FAVOUR OF PETITIONER. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT DATED 17.05.2011 ISSUED BY 5TH RESPONDENT EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF STATEMENT BASED DATA REGARDING THE SUB DIVISION IN THE 5TH RESPONDENT'S VILLAGE OFFICE. EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF SKETCH AND PLAN. EXT.P5 : TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 24.05.20101 ADDRSSED TO THE THIRD RESPONDENT. EXT.P6 : TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DATED 27.5.2011 BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.S TO JUDGE. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 16796 OF 2011 ......................................................................... Dated this the 22nd June , 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to have Ext. P5 petition preferred by the petitioner to rectify the mistake in the res-survey records is caused to be considered and disposed of. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. In view of the limited nature of the relief sought for, no fact adjudication is necessary. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the third respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P5, in accordance with law, of course, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and others concerned, if any, which shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 'three months' from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the third respondent for further steps. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk