BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Third day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15254 of 2011 EDWARD GEORGE ... PETITIONER/ SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THISAINVILAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.411 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.A.EBENEZER Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is the sole accused in Cr.No.411 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 294 (b), 427, 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. Apprehending arrest, at the hands of the respondent police, the petitioner is before this Court, is seeking anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of the prosecution, the petitioner attacked the de facto complainant with a knife and also criminally intimidated him. In the said attack, the de facto complainant sustained only simple injury and after treatment, he has been discharged from the hospital on 19.11.2011. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would deny the above allegations. According to him, due to election motive, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the petitioner is entitled for anticipatory bail. 4.I have considered the above submissions. 5.Having regard to the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with the following conditions: 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, on executing a bond for a sum of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. sd/- 23/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NANGUNERI. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THISAINVILAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. T.A.EBENEZER Advocate SR.No.41054 SR : 28.11.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15254 of 2011 Date :23/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/