IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.36 of 2008 DR. JAY SINGH Versus NAND KISHORE SINGH KUSHWAHA&OR ----------- 2. 19.12.2008 Surendra/ Heard counsel for the petitioner. While this Court would not find any error in refusing part of the amendment in the written statement seeking to actually take away admission made in paragraph 15 of the written statement to the extent that both the entries in Khatiyan as also corresponding Naksha were correct but then the court below ought to have allowed the other part of the amendment in the written statement in the same paragraph which sought to only explain the corresponding old plot number from which the new plots number are said to have been carved out. In that view of the matter, part of the amendment to the extent indicated above with regard to old plot number and its corresponding new plot number is allowed but the other part of the amendment in the written statement is hereby rejected. This application, therefore, is allowed to the aforementioned extent. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)