IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 22ND DECEMBER 2011 / 1ST POUSHA 1933 WP(C).No. 34608 of 2011(A) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. JAISAL, AGED 23 YEARS, PATTIKADAN HOUSE, VANIYAMBALAM P.O., VANDOOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. ANTONY JIJO, AGED 23 YEARS, THAYYIL HOUSE, MUNDAMVELLI P.O., KOCHI, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. VIJITH.K., AGED 23 YEARS, THEJUS, VANIYAMBALAM P.O., VANDOOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. FASLU RAHMAN, AGED 24 YEARS, PALLIKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, PATTARKULAM, NARAKKARA P.O., 5. SHEREEFA VEERAN C., AGED 23 YEARS, CHOLAYIL HOUSE, VANIYAMKULAM, PANAYUR P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 6. SHERIN THOMAS, AGED 23 YEARS, VANDAKATHLL HOUSE, ARUVAKODE, NILAMBUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 7. JESEEM K.K., AGED 24 YEARS, KUNHIKULATHIL HOUSE, MADAVUR P.O., NARIKUNI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 8. RAMEESHA.A, AGED 23 YEARS, ALUKKAL HOUSE, ANANTHAVOOR.P.O., THIRUNAVAYA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 9. MANAS MAJEED P., AGED 23 YEARS, POOVAKURUZHI HOUSE, MOORKANAD P.O., 10. ANSAR, AGED 24 YEARS, KALAKAPPARA, PANTHALUR P.O., MUDIKODE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 11. MOHAMMED SHIYAS BABU. P.T., AGED 23 YEARS, POTHIYIL HOUSE, THAZHEKODE. P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 12. NITHIN JOSE, AGED 24, THEKKUDAN HOUSE, IRINJALAKUDA. P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 13. ASHFAQ. P. , AGED 24 YEARS, POOKKOT HOUSE, BIG BAZAR, PERINTHALMANNA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. AS WPC.NO. 34608/2011 BY ADV. SRI.S.K.SAJU SRI.A.RANJITH NARAYANAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY. P.O., THENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. PIN-673635 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. PIN:673635 BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AS WPC.NO.34608/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS: EXT.P1A: COPY OF THE APLLICATION DATED 04/12/2011 FOR RE- VALUATIONS/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXT.P1B: COPY OF THE APLLICATION DATED 09/11/2011 FOR RE- VALUATIONS/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXT.P1C: COPY OF THE APLLICATION DATED 03/12/2011 FOR RE- VALUATIONS/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER. EXT.P1D: COPY OF THE APLLICATION DATED 11/12/2011 FOR RE- VALUATIONS/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER. EXT.P1E: COPY OF THE APLLICATION DATED 11/12/2011 FOR RE- VALUATIONS/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 5TH PETITIONER. EXT.P1F: COPY OF THE APLLICATION DATED 11/12/2011 FOR RE- VALUATIONS/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 6TH PETITIONER. EXT.P1G: COPY OF THE APLLICATION DATED11/12/2011 FOR RE- VALUATIONS/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 7TH PETITIONER. EXT.P1H: COPY OF THE APLLICATION DATED 11/12/2011 FOR RE- VALUATIONS/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 8TH PETITIONER. EXT.P1I: COPY OF THE APLLICATION DATED 08/12//2011 FOR RE- VALUATIONS/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 9TH PETITIONER. EXT.P1J: COPY OF THE APLLICATION DATED 07/12//2011 FOR RE- VALUATIONS/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 10TH PETITIONER. EXT.P1K: COPY OF THE APLLICATION DATED 13/12/2011 FOR RE- VALUATIONS/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 11TH PETITIONER. AS WPC.NO.34608/2011 EXT.P1L: COPY OF THE APLLICATION DATED 05/12/2011 FOR RE- VALUATIONS/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 12TH PETITIONER. EXT.P1M: COPY OF THE APLLICATION DATED 09/12/2011 FOR RE- VALUATIONS/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 13TH PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE AS ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).34608/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of certain papers in the 3rd and 5th semester B.Tech Degree Examination vide Ext.P1 series of applications and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within ten weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs