IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5449 OF 2005. APPLICATION NO. 5449 OF 2005. APPLICATION NO. 5449 OF 2005. IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 784 OF 2005. APPEAL NO. 784 OF 2005. APPEAL NO. 784 OF 2005. Ashok Dnyanoba Jadhav. ... Applicant. Versus. State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Shri Surel Shah for the Applicant. Shri S.V.More, A.P.P.for the Respondent-State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 19th October, 2006. : 19th October, 2006. : 19th October, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The Appeal filed against conviction by the Applicant/Accused No.1 has been admitted. The Applicant has been convicted for offence under section 304 Part II and section 325 of the Indian Penal Code. The substantive sentence is of five years. 2. The Applicant is in custody from January 2005 and has completed 21 months in jail. The Appeal is not likely to be heard till remaining period of sentence is over. Therefore, the Applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail on certain stringent conditions. 3. Hence the following order is passed: i) The Applicant shall be enlarged on bail in the sum of Rs.5000/- with one or two sureties of like amount. The bail is : 2 : 2 : 2 : granted subject to condition that the Applicant will report to the Taluka Police Station, Solapur on every first Saturday of every calender month till disposal of the Appeal. ii) The order of granting bail will be given effect to only after the Applicant produces evidence to show that he has deposited the fine amount. Judge. Judge. Judge.