1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 354 OF 2009 Bombay Railway Engineering Co. ...Petitioner. Vs. General Manager, Central Railway, CST, Mumbai ...Respondent. Mr. G.V. Merani, Partner in person. None for the Respondent. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 13TH JULY, 2009. P.C.- 1 The Petitioner has invoked Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, “the Act”), whereby the basic request is to appoint a new Arbitrator as the earlier Arbitrator is retired on 30th June, 2008 and thereafter, inspite of repeated request, the Respondent is not appointing /nominating any Arbitrator. 2 None appeared for the Respondent though served. Considering the averments made and as the dispute is yet not finalized and therefore, to avoid further delay, it is necessary that the Respondent to appoint 2 Arbitrator as per the terms of Arbitration Clause within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The Arbitrator in the present facts and circumstances is directed to consider and dispose of the matter as early as possible. 2 The Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)