IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 26TH MARCH 2009 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 9495 of 2009(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SUNI KUMARI, MANGALATHU ULA VEEDU, ARAYOOR. BY ADV. SRI.T.RAVIKUMAR SMT.G.AMBILI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR/SECRETARY CO-OPERATIVE SERVICE EXAM BOARD, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE SECRETARY, PERUMPAZHATHOOR CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., PERUMPAZHATHOOR. ADV. SRI.P.U.SHAILAJAN,SC,CO-OP.SERVICE EXAM FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO. 9495 OF 2009 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2009 JUDGMENT Kerala State Co-operative Examination Board is impleaded. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel, Adv.P.U.Shylajan for second respondent. Notice to first respondent dispensed with preserving the right to move for review of this judgment, if aggrieved. The petitioner, going by Exts.P1, P2 and P3, had different laps of temporary employment on daily wages with the second respondent. With the passage of time, the Co-operative Examination Board, invited applications to the post of Junior Clerk in the second respondent, along with other banks. Test was conducted by the Board and list has been forwarded to the society to conduct interview. It is stated that interview has also been conducted. After the introduction of Section 80(B) in the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, the recruitment of a regular entrant can be made only following the procedure as noted above. The petitioner cannot therefore insist on regularising her temporary appointments. It would also be WP(C) 9495/2009 2 unfair to other competing candidates if this court were to issue any direction as sought for, viz, that the experience earned by the petitioner should also be considered. These are matters left entirely with the realm of the Examination Board and the employer of the second respondent to make selection in accordance with the directions of Kerala Co-operative Societies Act and Rules and binding directions issued under those statutory provisions. Preserving the right of the petitioner to be appointed, if offered, this writ petition is dismissed. THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE lgk/27/3