BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Eighteenth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.10612 of 2011 S. MEENAKSHMI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLCIE AMBATHURAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, CR NO. NOT KNOWN/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. K.KANIMOZHI Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147,498 and 506(i) I.P.C. in Crime No.358 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner arrayed as A4 and the case was registered under Sections 147,498 and 506(i) I.P.C. in Crime No.358 of 2011. He further submits that the petitioner is nothing to do with the commission of offence and she has been falsely implicated in this case and the de-facto complainant herein filed a H.C.P(MD)No.521 of 2011 in that the petitioner has not shown as respondent and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the case has been registered on 15.08.2011. He further submits that her nephew A1-Jegan, who is the son of her sister Anandavalli had illegal intimacy with Devi wife of the de-facto complainant Devi eloped with Jagan. This petitioner is assisting for the marriage of Jagan/A1 Devi and the investigation is going on and hence he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the case has been registered on 15.08.2011, but A2 left her matrimonial home six months prior to the registration of the case and the investigation is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ going on and even though the petitioner was not arrested she neither interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of her arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul, on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul, and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 18/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III DINDIGUL. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLCIE, AMBATHURAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC TO M/S. B.S.MELTIUE, ADVOCATE SR.NO.28192 SR : 22.08.2011 : 2p/6c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10612 of 2011 Date :18/08/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/