1 S/10 S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 6198/2009. Sampat Lal Vs. The State of Rajasthan Date of Order :: 25th November 2009. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi, for the petitioner. Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, Public Prosecutor. ... BY THE COURT: The petitioner is accused of offences under Sections 341, 323, 325, 326, 307 IPC alongwith the co-accused persons; and has moved this application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. It is noticed that in this matter pertaining to FIR No. 86/2009 Police Station Kuchera, District Naguar, earlier, the bail application moved on behalf of the co-accused persons (S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.5815/2009: Om Prakash & Anr. Vs. The State of Rajasthan) was argued on 19.11.2009 by the learned counsel, who is appearing for the present petitioner too, essentially on the following submissions: ''that so far the present petitioners are concerned, they have not been assigned any dangerous weapon or any injury on the vital part of the body of the injured Nand Kishore; and the head injury is specifically assigned to the co-accused Sampat Lal with the sharp weapon.'' 2 With reference to such submissions and considering the material on record, the said co-accused persons were ordered to be enlarged on bail by this Court. For the very submissions as made by the learned counsel in the earlier bail application that the present petitioner Sampat Lal has been assigned the head injury with sharp weapon; and in comprehension of the overall circumstances, there appears no reason to grant indulgence in this bail application. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. moved on behalf of the petitioner Sampat Lal S/o Shankar Lal stands rejected. After dictation of this much of the order, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall stand advised not to press on this bail application; and, therefore, he would not press on the bail application at this stage. For the reasons and circumstances noticed above, there appears no justification to consider this part of the submissions as made at this stage. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. //Mohan//