1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITON NO. 8439 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Mr. V.D. Hon, Advocate for petitioner CORAM : B.R. GAVAI,J. DATE : 14th December, 2009 PER COURT : 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 23rd November, 2009 vide which the application filed by the present petitioner for recalling the witness, came to be rejected. 2. The learned trial court has given sound and cogent reasons for rejecting the application, which, in my view, cannot be termed as perverse. 3. In that view of the matter, no interference is warranted in the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence, writ petition is rejected. [B.R. GAVAI,J.] grt/- 2