W.P.(C) NO. 9012 of 2009 Misc. Case Nos. 10835 and 9973 of 2010 19.08.2015 Both the misc. cases have been filed by the petitioners as well as opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 for modification of order dated 6.4.2010. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 6.4.2010 the executing court by order dated 3.5.2010 directed the judgment debtor-husband to pay the decree holder Rs.96,293/- out of the service benefit lying with opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 and also directed the futur e accrued service benefit namely pension within one month of passing the order. While disbursi ng the said amount to the decree holder the court has also directed the petitioners to furnish an undertaking to vacate the quarter within a period of two weeks from the date of payment. Petitioner No.1 submits that the opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 have deducted fur ther amount on the basis that the judgment debtor has taken a loan of Rs.17,500/- during his s ervice period and they have calculated the same by including the interest on the said amount a t a higher rate. She further submits that in case they will deduct the same petitioner will ge t few rupees which is not sufficient for maintenance of the petitioners. Learned counsel for opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 submits that the petitioner is occupying the quarter till date. The payment shall be made by the opposite party on vacation of the quarter. This Court earlier in order dated 6.4.2010 recorded a clear finding regarding the dilapidated condition of the quarter and no step has been taken to repair the same nor ele ctric line or water connection were given. This Court has specifically directed rent for the s aid quarter need not be assessed from the date when water, electric connection and repair work were not been done i.e. from September, 2004. However from the order dated 3.5.2010 passed by the executing court it reveals that nothing has been reflected regarding the amount deducted towards house rent. In the meantime the judgment debtor opposite party No.1 died on 6.4.2014 a nd petitioners are entitled to family pension. Considering the fact and circumstances stated above and the condition of the q uarter which was in a dilapidated condition and no electricity and water connection are yet su pplied, this Court directs that in case the petitioners have applied for the family pension in such event the opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 shall consider the pension paper of the petitioner s as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of appli cation. On sanction of the family pension of the petitioners, the petitioners shall vacate the quarter within a period of six weeks from the said date of sanction in the interest of justic e and fair play. The executing court is directed to reconsider the entitlement of the petition ers out of the service benefit of opposite party No.1 as the said amount has not been paid by opposite party Nos. 2 and 3. Accordingly both the misc. cases are disposed of with the above modification. The rest part of the order dated 6.4.2010 shall remain unaltered. S. Panda, J 2