IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17186 of 2009 BALESHWAR RAM, S/O LATE SINGHESHWAR RAM, R/O VILL GHOSWARI, P.S.GHOSWARI, DISTT-PATNA ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, REGIONAL OFFICE, EMPLOYEE PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, 'R' BLOCK, ROAD NO.6, PATNA. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, VIKHARAULI(WEST), BOMBAY. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 9.12.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1. The grievance of the petitioner is that although he is receiving his pension from the Punjab National Bank, Ghoshwari via Mokama, but he is not receiving the same regularly from January, 2007. Mr R.S. Pradhan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent no.1 submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of the grievances with regard to the payment of pension, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Patna (respondent no.1). In case such a representation is filed stating his grievances as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, respondent no.1 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, 2 preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances raised in the representation could be redressed without further delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)