IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32690 of 2010 SIYARAM MAHATO, SON OF KAMAL MAHATO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MALANGIYA, POLICE STATION-RAHIKA, DISTRICT-MADHUBANI. …..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. Subash Kumar Jha (Advocate). For the State : APP. ----------- 03/ 12.01.2011 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered under Sections 304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Sessions Trial No. 557 of 2008 arising out of Madhubani Sadar (Rahika) P.S. Case No. 341 of 2008. Perused the report. The report dated 28th of October, 2010 mentions that out of eight (8) charge sheeted witness only the Investigating Officer was to be examined. Hopefully, the case would have concluded by now. The trial court is directed to take steps to conclude the trial within three months. If the trial is not concluded within this period then the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail before 2 the court below. While disposing of the bail application the trial court must detail the entire circumstances as to why the trial has not been disposed off within the stipulated time. kksinha/- (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)