IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2010 / 12TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 15954 of 2010(Q) ----------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------- UNAISATH.K.V, D/O.A.V.MAMMU, RESIDING AT K.V.HOUSE, THANGALA VAYAL, VALAPATTANAM, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.A.MOHAMED MUSTAQUE SRI.T.PRAVEEN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. NAJEEB.M, S/O.MARIKKAR, AGED 35 YEARS, AZAR NIVAS, P.O.THANA, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VALAPATTANAM POLICE STATION. 3. THE PASSPORT OFFICER, PASSPORT OFFICE, KOZHIKODE. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. S.U. NAZAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.RAMKUMAR, J ...................................................... W.P. ( C) No. 15954 of 2010 ........................................................... Dated: 2nd day of June, 2010 JUDGMENT Petitioner who is the wife of one Najeeb challenges Ext.P1 order dated 5-4-2010 passed by the J.F.C.M. II, Kannur as per which the learned Magistrate has ordered that the court has no objection in issuing a police clearance certificate to the said Najeeb. 2. Reliance placed on the decision Ashok Kumar v. State of Kerala - 2009 (2) KLT 712 is of no avail to the petitioner since that was for permission sought from the Court to go abroad and the court before which the case of the applicant was pending. Here the only order passed is that the criminal court has no objection in issuing a police clearance certificate to the accused who is facing the charge of an offence punishable under Section 498 A I.P.C. I, therefore, do not find any good ground to interfere with Ext.P1 order passed by the learned Magistrate. This Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE ani/