,^^-t- • - ^ IN THS HIGH COURT OF JUBICATURE AT JABALFUR ,^ ^v,--"" .PETITION-SRS esass '^^. ,^^^^^'^;'?- •^B y &. Wiu ^' I/: 'ff,! W^<ivLXS¥ '^Ss^Sy1' '''^^^^-•'--••-^^^i^ • '^^^^^^'^' ),3^3 /97 '"Jt^ S^t»Je-. ^5--m^ . Tlyv^yt-^ Jfc^.' $ I^Qy^Blrectort ,:Sericultxire^ Regional Tassar Pield Researah.' Centre^'. • •. '.. .Jagdalpur, BisttoBe.stsr. 2» Asstt.Dlreotor, SeriGUltural, .Re.glonal Tas sar Field:. ReseBroh; • Sentre ^. Jagdalpur Di st t «Ba star» 5, Field O'fflcer, XsisaxSiSB^dSaHaKa- . ^ Silk Firm, Slnghanpur,©istt.Bastar» -. V2RSUS - ' ' s4l» E?^esidiag °fficer, Labour gourt» •i Raipur^ p 2« Phopl Singh, • 5«, Sant-a. Rara 4, Ssmlu^ , . . ' . ' , L 5« Jhodia 6» .Laxman. ' - 7^,,lShysmsunder<, .. • . , Sill^ through Bast.ar Kesa Ma^ioor; Sangh^ Ma'zdoor- Bhawan,. B < S•Colony„ Kirandu^ Di§<tt«B3S.tar,*' . . .• , ':- ' '.. • ' : • P53TITION UKDER fTICLES 226/227 OF TRE CGNSTITUTION OF DTDIA r 5?-' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Wnt Petition No. 303 of 1997 Petitioners The State of M.P. (now State of C.G.) Uirough tlie Dy, Director, Sericulture, Regional Tassar Pield Reseai'ch Centre, Jagdalpur aad ofhers Versus Respoiideiits Presidiag Officer, Laboiir Court, Raipur and another : Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. A^iihotri. Snit. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the pctitioners. Shri A. K. Paiidey^ Advocate for fhe respoudeute No. 2 to 7. i"?^^^^^. ORAL ORDER (6& July, 2006) The foUowiiig orcler of the Court is passed by K. A^iiSaotri, J. 1. This petition cliaUeiiges fhe validity of fhe Hitermi order dated 17.11.1996 passed by tlie Laboiir Court, Raipur in Case No. 102/96 I,D, Act Refereiice where^ fhe petitioiiers were clh'ected to reuistate tlie workers/respondente aad make 75% paynient, as interini measure, 2. Tliis Court by order datecl 27.1,1997 stayed fhe impugned order dated 17.11.1996. 3. It is hifomied at the Bar aiid admitted by learaed counsel for both the parties that fhe pendiiig matter ia tlie Labour Court has already been disposed o£ 4, Iii of tlie fiiial disposal of the matter, pendiag before the Labozir Court, this petitioii become infructuous, 5. The petition is accordmigly disniissed as haviag becoisie iafructuoiis, Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge