1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITON NO. 269 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5212 OF 2002 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ This contempt petition alleges disobedience of order dated 29.1.1996 passed by the learned Division Bench in writ petition No. 4352 of 1992 (Bombay) and writ petition No. 5212 of 2002 (Aurangabad) is finally disposed of. Counsel for the petitioner informs this court that interim relief in terms of prayer clause "C" was granted in favour of the petitioner thereby the respondents were prevented from removing the shops of the petitioners. Since the writ petition itself has been disposed of and this contempt petition is filed in the year 2010 for the alleged disobedience of the order dated 29.1.1996, in my opinion, in view of the provisions of Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, this contempt petition, being time barred, cannot be entertained. That apart, since the writ petition 2 itself is disposed of, no further adjudication of this contempt petition is necessary. Contempt petition is disposed of. Notice stands discharged. (S. S. SHINDE. J.) Date:28.10.2010. rlj/