vm !!'il??P!I.IS;i^lr^~^3ii; l^:lsl'i ?iBW :^a^ ^, I c^^ IN THE HIGH COURT O^CHHATTISGARH_AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. • /2004 Wls® PETITIONER ^^ '. ^s^ ^%x ^yy ••" -A'3' <?^y ^^ V. RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. Data Ram Gabel, aged about^64 years, son of Late Raghunath Prasad Gabel, r/o. village Chikhalraunda, PO Jhaalrounda, Tah. Jaijaipur, Distt. Janjir- Champa (CG) State of Chhattisgarh, through : Secretar/, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG) y.- /• if' \\ l^f-Wj 2. The Director, Lokshikshan Sanchalnalay, Raipur (C.G) 3. The Joint Director, Education, Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh) -C'^ o 4. The Joint Director, (Treasury Pension and Accounts), Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. The District Education Officer, Distt. Janjgir- Champa (Chhattisgarh) 6. The District Education Officer, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 7. The Block Education Officer, Sakti, Distt. Janj'gir-Champa (Chhattisgarh) v WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI / MANDAMUS ETC. rn"""*lli!ButLi!°!"i" XI-HC-22 /5>1 ^-S[':?ITqrazI, afll-M'ls. an^^il T?;]1?i'3I1^I gWWHftti y H/- sn^i ??gTwaf?tT Shri Roshan Dubey, coiuis^l for the petitioner. Shri Sandeep Dubey, Govtj qnqfei^ lITTOf 'q •fe^ •(F^OTt ^ 3lP?R 3n^[ Adv., fer the State. Heaixl. The present petitioja has been filed claiaung the pre aiid post rettral dues. | Learned counsel for tl^e petitioner subinits that tlie petitioner inay be given aa | opporturuty to fue a de'tailed representation before the coiapejtent authority of the respondents, which shall be considered on its own inerits m. accordao.ce with law. I . Haviag considered and wjithout expressing aay opiiiion on the merits of the case, ia fhe opp-aion of this Court, ends of justice wiU be served if a direction is [given to the petitioner to aiake a detedled repi-esentation raisiug l^s grievanlces before fb.e coiupetent autbority of fhe respondents alc^ng wifh a copy of the petition and this order, wittliii three we^ks froni today, and on such representation being filed,, t respondents sliaU decide tlie sa^ue on its own m.erits in accordance with law by a i-easoned order, a fhree nionths froni the date of 'petitioner is required to be hearjl, he niay be heard aiid the proper opportiuiity of leaduig evidencq dues whlch are pavable to the betitioner accordiag to law be paid to him. If the grievaace still retnains, fhe petitioner niay avail tlie reniedv available at law. With disposed of. the aforesaid ob disposed of. jie coiupetent authorift' of the' early as possible preferably withia 'eceipt of the representation. If the be provided to him. AU the ^ers'ations, this petitiou staiids ^endiag applications also stand Sd;- Fakhruddin x Judge !vt^^v>^