1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1. WP/6573/2009 (SAVITA GANGARAM VEDE AND ANR V/S ASHOK NAGORAO VEDE AN D OTHERS. -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.S.P.Katneshwarkar, Counsel for the petitioner. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:7-4-2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard. The writ petition seeks to challenge the order of learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Basmath, in terms of Order 1 Rule 10 of Civil Procedure Code. 2. The observation of the learned Judge that the application is not tenable in the eyes of law, indeed, calls for interference. The plaintiff sought impleadment of the two married sisters, named in the application. It was to avoid any technical difficulties left by 2 mistakes in the pleadings. I do not see that any wrong message was tried to be given or plaintiff wanted mileage over the defects. The order under challenge requires interference, it is set aside. Application moved before the learned Judge is allowed. The impleadment to be carried within 14 days. Writ Petition (No.6573/2009) allowed in above terms. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... (agp:6573-09wp)