IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 8420 of 2008. Decided on: 06.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Kaula Devi. … Petitioner. Versus Director of Primary Education and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. Ms. Kiran Dhiman, Advocate vice Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate for respondent No.3. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Mr. Lalit Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition in view of Rule 12 of the Scheme Framed by the State of Himachal Pradesh in 1996 and new Scheme which was formulated in 2000. The petitioner is permitted to make a representation to respondent No.1, within a period of three weeks from today. The petitioner is permitted to take all the pleas which have been taken in this petition and any other additional material to assail the appointment of respondent No.3 under Rule 12 of the Scheme. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - The representation made by the petitioner shall be decided by respondent No.1 within a period of six week after the production of certified copy of this judgment. He shall pass a speaking order. He is also directed to see the suitability of the petitioner and of respondent No.3 as per Rule 12 of the Scheme. In case the representation filed by the petitioner is allowed, respondent No.3 shall not claim any equity. 2. Consequently, in view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition is disposed of so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 06, 2010. (sck).