mp t IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 301 OF 2008 In FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 198 of 2008 Viraj V. Tikekar .. Appellant versus Ms.Kavita V. Tikekar .. Respondent ... Mr.Ajit Kulkarni with Mr.H.P. Vyas for the appellant. Mr.S.V. Pitre for respondent no.1. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE AND D.G. KARNIK, JJ DATED : 7th January 2009 P.C.: . We have heard the learned counsel for both the spouses. We have also considered the affidavit in reply filed by respondent wife. Mr.Kulkarni has taken us through the operative part of the order passed by the family court and which order has been impugned in Family Court Appeal no.198 of 2008 and we are satisfied that except clause no.5 of the said order there is no case to stay the operation of the remaining order. . Hence the application is partly allowed and it is directed that clause no.5 of the impugned order passed by the family court shall stand stayed during the pendency of the appeal. (D.G.KARNIK, J) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J)