IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH JANUARY 2009 / 24TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 38135 of 2008(M) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- SMT.P.P.PATHUMMA, AGED 81 YEARS W/O.LATE NELLIKUNNAN MOHAMMED, NELLIKUNNAN HOUSE P.O.DOWN HILL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,KERALA 676 519. BY ADV. SRI.V.VENUGOPALAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE BRANCH MANAGER KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES, KALPATTA WAYANAD. 2. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY ARADHANA BUILDING, KOZHICODE. ADV. SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN FOR R1 SRI.M.L.SAJEEV THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/01/2009, HE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 38135 OF 2008 (M) ==================== Dated this the 14th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T The grievance in this writ petition was mainly against Ext.P1, a sale notice published by the 1st respondent in respect of the properties mentioned therein. It is mainly complaining of the vagueness in the notice that the writ petition is filed. 2. Standing counsel appearing for the 1st respondent today submits that Ext.P1 was not a sale notice and was only an advertisement, and that, so far property has not been sold, mainly on account of the fact that the defaulters had in the meanwhile remitted an amount of Rs.1 lakh. It is also submitted that if and when property is to be sold, fresh notice of sale will be notified, and thereafter only sale will be conducted. In view of the above, the grievance as regards Ext.P1 does not survive for consideration. Writ petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp