IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No.841 of 2011 1. Smt. Kanta Sharma, W/o Ram Prakash Sharma, 2. Pankaj Sharma S/o Shri Ram Prakash Sharma, Both R/o 19/474 Pala, Sahibabad, P.S. Sasnigate, District Aligarh (U.P.). ….…..Petitioners Versus 1- State of Uttarakhand through Secretary in the Department of Home, Dehradun. 2- S.H.O. P.S. Nehru Colony, District Dehradun. 3- Smt. Geetanjali alais Geeta, D/o Shri S.N. Upadhyay, R/o D-16 Jyoti Vihar, Ajabpur, Tanda, Dehraun. ……Respondents Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate, present for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, A.G.A., present for the State. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard. 2) By means of this writ petition moved under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioners have sought quashing of First Information Report dated 09.08.2011, registered as Crime No. 109 of 2011, relating to offences punishable under Section 498A, 323, 504, 313 of I.P.C., and one punishable under Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Police Station- Nehru Colony, District Dehradun. 2 3) Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the criminal case, after premarital pregnancy of the complainant got detected However, serious allegations of demand of dowry, with full details, are made against the present petitioners, and father- in-law of the complainant. As to the premarital pregnancy is concerned, it is a matter of investigation. 4) Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the investigation of the case. The writ petition is dismissed summarily, with the observation that if the petitioners namely Kanta Sharma and Pankaj Sharma, surrender before the court concerned, their bail application shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay (Stay application No. 10120 of 2011, stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 26.09.2011 JM