AB 436/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.K. MUSAHARY Heard Mr. SN Sarma, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr J Handique, learned co unsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. BS Sinha, learned Addl. PP, Assam. It is submitted by Mr Sarma, that the present accused petitioner was implicated earlier in Chandmari PS Case No.20/2009 u/s 420/468/471/406 IPC and in the said case he was enlarged on bail by order dated 16-3-2009 passed by this court in Ba il Application No.986/2009. Subsequently, he was implicated in another case, nam ely, Tezpur PS Case No.450/2010 u/s 420/468/406 IPC and in the said case also he was enlarged on bail by an order dated 8-10-2010 passed by this court in Bail A pplication No.3922/2010. After he got the bail orders he appeared before the I.O . for recording his statement, as directed by the court. Thereafter, again anoth er case, namely, Biswanath Chariali PS Case No.201/2010 u/s 419/420 IPC was regi stered against the present petitioner alleging that the FDRs submitted by him ar e fake and on that score his work order issued earlier by the authorities in his favour was cancelled. The connected case diary could not be produced today inspite of providing chance s on two occasions. However, I have considered the matter on the basis of the al legations made in the FIR against the accused petitioner as well as the earlier orders passed, as indicated above, by this court granting pre-arrest bail. The p resent case is quite similar to the earlier cases as it reveals from the FIR its elf. The fact and the allegation as to whether the FDRs submitted by the accused peti tioners are fake or genuine could be ascertained from the records of the issuing authorities, namely, the bank concerned. The accused petitioner is a registered Class-I contractor of the PWD besides being a permanent resident of Sonitpur di strict having his family members and root to the society. There is no chance of absconding or avoiding the due process of law if the petitioner is enlarged on b ail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances I direct that in the event of arrest of the accused petitioner, Prakash Bora, who has been implicated in Bisw anath Chariali PS Case No.201/2010 u/s 419/420 IPC, shall be enlarged on bail of Rs.20,000/- with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority with condition that he shall extend full cooperation with t he investigating authority and he shall appear again before the I.O. concerned within a period of 10 days. Bail petition stands disposed of.