IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19363 of 2011 Jitendra Kumar Singh @ Tinku Versus Reshma Devi @ Twinkal ---------------------------------- 03. 01.12.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The husband has filed this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 26.7.2011 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Munger in Matrimonial Suit No. 27 of 2011 whereby the court below directed the petitioner to pay Rs.1000/- per month as maintenance and Rs.200/- litigation cost. The learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is getting only Rs.2000/- per month and it is impossible to pay such a huge amount. From perusal of the impugned order and the certificate annexed with this writ application it appears that the petitioner is getting Rs.2040/- per month in addition to lodging and fooding. Considering this fact the learned court below has directed to the petitioner to pay only Rs.1000/- per month and Rs.200/- as litigation cost. I, therefore, find no jurisdictional error in the impugned order. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. S.S. (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)