O^.lzrz^_ ^ l<i- BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIQNERS RESPONDENTS w. p. (cr NO. \s^ / 2010 ^ M/s M.D. Industries, through its Managing Partner- Ritesh Pinjani, 21-E, Kaliparade, Industrial Estate, Opp. Union Carbide, Berasia Road, Bhopal (M.P.) VERSUS 1) State of Chhattisgarh - through the Secretary, Home (Jail) Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) \o z^y / ./6^ vy^;/ ^ ^^ ^ .- 2) -3) The Director General of Jail, Jail Headquarter, Raipur (C.G.) The Inspector General of Jail, Jail Headquarter, Raipur, (C.G.) 4) Superintendent of Jail, Central Jail, Bilaspur (C.G.) 5) Superintendent of Jail, Central Jail, Durg (C.G.) ^. p'^ WRIT PET!T!QN_UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA '^ n NlQfi^^C^i^CSiF^MHii^ ;'-;:^P.^NO.^?S63©Fl20W:;^:-:-.^ PETfi^NiR RESfONDiNT& (VI/sM.D. Industries .Versus'::;"!;;.'<l '11:':. '.:. StafeofCH^ttisgarh&others. •/' ^' VVR|11PiilTli ^N^^ •^lNNAr:..^:;.'''.:.-1,:..';:;.^^ ^Divjsion^Ben<^;.-l-:;?NOFi*yte^Shn1, Qudclijsi^£ji4:'G';-'"^ :HQR>tele^hTl:N.K..:Aaarwal.:*l»l.::.;'l: n,^. : ^> :l^res^;:|S|in^hish^Surana^j©oyriseifo ^sS'.^l^.''i.D6epalr "^:.."•:Pan<3ey^/':;^ 'Pane!:: .'':1;•l^wyer. i,iStatei'^iohcl|nte;^ for!::n'the1:. ;"•„/" ORAI.ORDER (Pass®donQ2nadayof^ugust,20'iO) '.Per1.M.l^uddusi.:J.\.lll-:':;:^s^y.'<'',::.^ •:'::"..:.':..:,'. ^eardt^:^^:^l^ .2,;IJ,:'t,The^wnt'peti|i€?ne^^ ,:1:.''l.>^.^hat::th{s^N6n'&le^^tirti^^^ aside^uash the jmpygnectKOfder dated(^^^^^2^^ R-1) passedbyresporidentNQ^^ribeh^iyof^^ ^ 2. ^ ^ That^the ^ theResporiderrtauthoritiestQmak^ l^ast LightinglS^^m su(5|iied and mstelle^ 1irm,^p?rthiitnvoiees^^^ra interest tS-^reon atprevailjF^ termN<?.16^the^lDCRateeontr^ 3. ThatanyotlTerreHef^inGludtngth®^ it appe&rs to be fjt.and^appropnate ^ ^gjran^.l{^;'\l''.,:,.i^::,'^^'....'^ 3^^^^ T th&impugnedbr<|$r^ p^ssedwithoyt issuing^any shcwcause n<?tjce<^^ A^ the suppiy was alreacly^^^^^^^ thereM^Tiosensetojc^ncelthesuj:^ ^ SSS ^ Kvr ^ge. Jtisa contra^atniatterbuttliepetjtjon Rs.41,Q5,452/-whichjsduefo^paiciNrtttes perthepurchaseorderissuedbytherespond^^^ 4. At this stage, we are not jnclined to interfere on ments, as we are of the opiinion that e petition^r before ths respondent No.2. ifthe petitiongr feels aggri decisjon <>f the respondents o^^^^h him tofile a fresh representation. The reprssentatiQn shaii be^^^^d withaspeakingGrder,dulycommunicatedtothepetitipner,asearJyas possible, preferabl^^w j?rpdu(^ipn[pfacppy^^^^^ moyeGlearJier,asthecasemaybe. Sd/- LM.Quddusi Judge Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge