IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 17TH AUGUST 2009 / 26TH SRAVANA 1931 RP.No. 777 of 2009 -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.1329/2009 Dated 13/01/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENTS 4 & 5 IN THE WPC -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.R. DEEPA. RESPONDENT/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1-3 IN THE WPC ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VALIYA ERI PADASEKHARA SAMITHI, KANJIKKODE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY V.CHAKRAPANI, S/O.VENKITACHALAM, AGED 55 YEARS, C.V.K.NIVAS, THANIZHTHARA, KANJIKKODE-678 626, PALAKKAD DIST. 2. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, RAIL BHAVAN, NEW DELHI. 3. THE INDIAN RAILWAY BOARD, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN, RAIL BHVAN, NEW DELHI. 4. THE NODAL OFFICER OF THE PROPOSED INDIAN RAILWAY COACH FACTORY, KANJIKKODE, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, PALAKKAD. BY ADV.JACOB SEBASTIAN. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: app/- S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ============ R.P. No.777/2009 =============== Dated this the 17th day of August 2009. O R D E R ========= State has filed this review petition seeking review of my judgment dated 13.1.2009 in W.P.(C). No.1329 of 2009. In the judgment, I only directed the Union of India to consider a representation submitted by the petitioner in the matter of acquisition of the land for the purpose of establishment of a coach factory. The consideration of the representation does not in any way affect the state Government. I have not issued any direction on merits of the contentions also. That being so, I do not think that there is any ground for review of my judgment. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE app/-