IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No 18 of 1998 in SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATIONNo 8285 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE KSHITIJ R.VYAS and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE AKSHAY H.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- DG PATEL Versus SWATIBEN KESHAVLAL VYAS -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No. 18 of 1998 MR PJ MEHTA for Appellant MR BN RAVAL for Respondent No. 1 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 2-4 GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 5 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE KSHITIJ R.VYAS and MR.JUSTICE AKSHAY H.MEHTA Date of decision: 31/03/2003 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE KSHITIJ R.VYAS) Learned Counsel Mr.P.J.Mehta for the appellant states that the matter is amicably settled as respondent No.1 has voluntarily retired. In that view of the matter, according to Mr.Mehta, this Letters Patent Appeal has become infructuous. Rejected as having become infructuous. (Kshitij R. Vyas, J.) (Akshay H. Mehta, J.) Sreeram.