^ /•' IN THE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH. JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No 4^°3 /2005 » •3"p ^" ••'\'f^ .rf^;'" QG '^' ^s"' Respondents ^^ ^c%>€^? 9\6l^ .•f-' Petitioner .\Q^ ,,,'^^^f '• ^- B.L.Dhruv, Son ofShri RatiRam Dhruv, ^'* .^v>.y'<f Age 59 years, AgriGulture Development Officer (Soil Consen/ation) Sub Division, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund ^' (C.G.) ,sy.^ .^^^ ^.,^T&-fNVx''n Versus y\ 1. StateofChhattisgarh, through Secretary, Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). ,2. Director, Directorate of Agriculture, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh). ^3. Director,_ Directorate of Agriculture, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). j 26/2 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/2270F CONSTITUTION OF INDIA iiicatgwi^ <jCTl'<||<|lc9<l, »TlUl<IS,Rei<H3^ ._yf_<l<?°T.!or ^STWlR'O* ai^?isBti<B W-20,000 •3[I^9Tqa?F (^3%) ?RIItR^lfttT3(rt?I 17/10/200S Shri Raaaaka&t My . Shri Arun Sao, Dy. Heard finatlv with t| The petitidner, wl Developiuent Officer Mahasamund District Petition iinder Articte 2: direction to respondent I^ the post 6f Agricultural E| consequential benefits fli{ At fhe veiy outset, that in this regard, (Aanexure P-4) before tbj been decided so far. He petition inay be disposed) dispose of the period granted by fhis Learaed counsel to retire on :28tl1 dispose ofthe case at This luaited prs^ petitioner is not opposed -w The saaxe is aUowe^ thfc represent^tion Cdurt. Febru^iy sortte cpi<ifn<Di ii*inTffl®^<Ritt;i'i ^sri^pTan^ i^bra, leamed courtselforthe petitioner. [Govt. Advocate for respondent Nos. 1&3. tfie conseat ofbofhthe parties. 16 is presenfly working as Agriculture (Sofl Coaservatiori} : Sub Division, »tIatiasamUEt(t (C.G.) Jias filed this Writ j6/227 of the Constitution of India for a [o.3 to cpnsider his case for proniotion to, [evelopiaent OfBcer w.e.f. 1983 and fbr all fcreof. feamed counsel for fhe petitioner subniits petiuoner had filed a representation respondent No.3, but the same has not jfurther subinits that for the present, this ofwith a direction to respondent No.3 to (Annexure P-4) withia a stipulated ateo subinits that as the petitioner is goiug uy, 2006, the3?efore, soiae directioh to early date may be issued. ;r made bv learaed counsel for fhe av teamed counsel for the State. ss • s^ 6^^^' ^^^^^a^^^ . ^s. w^ ^^^-^^^^•/ii\'^':s''-^^^ ^S'^^^i \di?ci*<ii<iin«,t»TTI'<i''ia.,fiwwyt *ll*lwi^TT^ .y.^1 •a^ ^ airttTmft'ii* BWan^CTBqra? fft s< f' sii^si *WF (i^fgTO) swim^ftCTsn^sT If so advised, tfa|i representation (AnTiexur| anS a copv of this ordei period pf3 weeks froiu t<] the -CQiiipetent authori^t pQssible preferably wifhjn leceipt/ filing of fhe said With the aforesaidl staads iuially disposed o| .<ni<ifcri)i iiiCTT'fls'clxRitsn ^ai^rsn^r •:'^1 yetttiiO&er may file a fresh copy of P-4) alongwith a eopy of Writ Petition before the competent authority within a ^day aiad if such a representation is filed^ shall dispose of th& same as early as a p^nod of.^.weeks fixini the date of ^epreseiitation. . ,; , observations aad directious, this petition 'atfhisstage. -—- SunilKumarSinha Judge RtffS^OOS-20,000 W'0. ?^ ^ IBBiSSBKI SSS^ig'SSi^ !SS8S ^;5^^ •r ^^&^ :? ^S^S •;1^^^ ^M^Sis IH8sl SSBfi 11SS! KS^S