IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 11033 OF 2010 Date of Decision: 01.11.2011 Bindu Patel and another ..Petitioners Versus Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak & another ..Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT Present : Mr. N.K.Malhotra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Ajit Atri, Advocate, for respondent No.2. **** SURYA KANT J. (Oral) The petitioners herein are aggrieved by the cancellation of their admission in B.Ed. Course in respondent no.2 a Self Financed Private College. The respondent University has filed its reply/affidavit which ex-facie casts doubt on the genuineness of the petitioners' as candidature for admission to B.Ed. Course. The allegation of the University that petitioner no.1 has got admission through impersonation cannot be brushed aside lightly. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent University to hold a fact finding enquiry into the genuineness of the candidature/admission of the petitioners and if so required, take police help for this limited purpose. In case the University authorities are satisfied that the petitioners had genuinely applied and/or got admission in B.Ed. Civil Writ Petition No. 11033 OF 2010 [2] Course though may not be with the approval of the observers appointed by it, the directions issued vide separate detailed order of even date passed in Civil Writ Petition No. 10997 of 2010 (Monica Aggarwal and others V. Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak and another) shall apply in the present case as well. Dasti. 01.11.2011 (SURYA KANT) 'ravinder' JUDGE