1 criapln2922-2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2922 OF 2011 1] Avinash S/o Prabhakar Patil 2] Prabhakar S/o Dayaram Patil 3] Rajnibai w/o Prabhakar Patil .. APPLICANTS Vs 1] The State of Maha. ...RESPONDENT ... Shri A.K.Tiwari, Adv.for applicant. Shri B.J.Sonawane,APP for R-State. Ms.Sadaf Kazi, Adv.for assist APP. ... CORAM : T.V.NALAWADE,J. DATE : 02/08/2011 ORAL ORDER: 1] This application is filed for anticipatory bail in Crime No.128/11 registered in Dharangaon police station, Dist.Jalgaon, for offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 306 r.w. 34 of I.P.C. APP is ready with papers of investigation. 2] Advocate of applicants submitted that he is not pressing 2 criapln2922-2011 application in respect of applicant no.2. He submitted that applicant no.1 Avinash is already arrested and so his application becomes infructuous. Application in respect of applicant nos.1 and 2 stands disposed of. 3] Crime is registered on the basis of report given by one Sandip Patil who is cousin of the deceased. Deceased was given in marriage to applicant no.1 about 1 and ½ years prior to the date of incident. Allegations are made that the husband and relatives were asking deceased to bring Rs.2 Lakhs from her parents as they wanted to purchase transport vehicle. Allegations are made ill treatment was given to the deceased. Deceased used to disclose about ill treatment to the complainant and other relatives from parents side. Allegations are made that at the time of Diwali festival, 2010 also, applicant no.2 had repeated the demand and he had given threat that he would not allow the deceased to return to matrimonial house. The incident took place on 20/6/11 and in the house of her parents prior to that, the husband and his relatives had refused to take her to matrimonial house as demand was not met with. Allegations are made that due to aforesaid treatment, deceased committed suicide probably by consuming poison. Papers show that the main allegations are against husband and father in law. Allegations against mother in law are vague in nature. It is not specifically contended that applicant no.3 was insisting that deceased should bring money. Applicant no.3 is a 3 criapln2922-2011 lady and in view of the aforesaid circumstances, this Court holds that relief can be granted to the applicant no.3. So interim relief granted in favour of applicant no.3 is confirmed. Interim relief granted in favour of applicant no.2 is vacated. [T.V.NALAWADE,J.] umg/criapln2922-11