HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO Writ Petition No. 20419 of 1998 Date: 15.02.2008 Between: K.Venkateswara Rao … Petitioner and The Managing Director, A.P. Women’s Co-op. Finance Corporation Limited, Hyderabad & another … Respondents O R D E R: This writ petition has been instituted seeking a writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not regularizing the service of the petitioner as Gardener-cum-Watchman and not paying him salary and allowances in accordance with the pay scale attached to the said post. The necessity to go into all the other details and also the right to claim regularisation is obviated because the Managing Director of the Andhra Pradesh Women’s Co-operative Finance Corporation Limited passed order through his proceedings No.5440/WCFC/A2/A-13/2006 dated 20.04.2007 extending the regular pay scale of Rs.4050-9050 to the petitioner with effect from 01.03.2007. In fact, even in the past, the consolidated pay of the writ petitioner has been revised appropriately and hence, it is sought to be made out on behalf of the Corporation that no unfair treatment is meted out insofar as the writ petitioner is concerned. In these set of circumstances, it is appropriate to extract what has been pointed out in paragraph 4 of the counter-affidavit, which is to the following effect: “ In reply to paras 2 and 3 of the affidavit I submit that the petitioner was appointed temporarily on 11.12.1990 as a Gardner-cum-Day Watchman on consolidated pay for Rs.600/- for 6 months only. The petitioner is drawing a consolidated pay of Rs.600/- per month for 6 months only. Later his consolidated pay was enhanced from 600/- to 1000/-. Again I enhanced his salary of the petitioner for Rs.2250/- from 01.08.1998 in circular No.1166/WCFC/C1/94 dt.24.08.1998. The xerox copy of the circular is herewith filed. Later his salary was also enhanced Rs.3800/- per month from 1.3.2005 to 28.2.2006. It is further submitted that sanctioned regular pay scale to the petitioner in proceedings 5440/WCFC/A2/A-13//2006 dt. 20.04.2007 usual allowance admissible thereon temporarily with effect from 1.3.2007. The xerox copy of the said proceedings is herewith filed. Hence it is false to state that the petitioner was denied of the regular salary.” The writ petitioner is also satisfied and contented with the relief that has been accorded by the Corporation, as is represented today at the Bar. In view of these developments, no further orders are needed to be passed in the writ petition and all further proceedings shall abate. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) February 15, 2008 ksld