1 wp8164.sxw ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8164 OF 2010 Smt.Sharifa Khan & Other ...Petitioners vs. The Asst.Municipal Commissioner and the Competent Authority & Others ...Respondents Mr.Rajiv Singh i/b Mr.Nirmal Thakur for the petitioners Mr.R.A.Lokhande i/b Mr.D.A.Nalawade for the respondent nos.2-S.R.A. Mr.Gautam Ankad i/b Mr.Satish Ingle for respondent no.3 Mr.Vineet Naik along with Mr.Vatsal Shah i/b M/s.Naik Paranjape & Co. for respondent no.4 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : OCTOBER 12, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and the learned counsel for the respondent no.4. The learned counsel for the petitioners on instructions of the petitioners states that if the 4 th respondent makes a statement that permanent accommodation as per the eligibility of the petitioners will be alloted in V.P.Nagar area, the petitioners will not press the petition on merits. The learned counsel for the 4 th respondent states that permanent accommodation will be made available to the petitioners as per their entitlement in the V.P.Nagar area. Statement is accepted. 2 In view of this statement, writ petition is not 2 wp8164.sxw pressed and the same is disposed of as not pressed. 3 The petitioners through their counsel undertake to vacate the structure in dispute within a period of one week from today. Undertaking is accepted. In view of the undertaking, the order of eviction shall not be implemented for a period of one week from today. JUDGE