[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 1150 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra ..Applicant [Ori.Complainant] Vs. Ramkeval Rajkumar Saroj alias Rakesh Pradipsingh Rajput and Ors. ..Respondents .... Mr.P.S.Hingorani, APP for State .... CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : ARPIL 09, 2008 : ARPIL 09, 2008 : ARPIL 09, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned APP for the Applicant-State. The Applicant-State of Maharashtra has preferred this Criminal Appeal for enhancement of sentence awarded to the Respondents-original accused. The learned Sessions Judge convicted the Respondents under Section 399 of the IPC and sentenced them to the period of imprisonment already undergone by them, which is almost three and half years each. Looking to the facts and circumstances of this case, we do not find that it is a fit case to enhance the sentence imposed on the respondents. 2. Appeal dismissed. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [F.I.REBELLO, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [F.I.REBELLO, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [F.I.REBELLO, J.]