:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 185 OF 1989 Goverdhandas V. Chandiramani .. Petitioner Vs. 1. Amritlal Jayatram Panchal and Ors. .. Respondents None for the petitioner. Ms. S.S. Dwivedi for Respondent No.1. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. Date Date Date : October 21, 2005. : October 21, 2005. : October 21, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . None for the petitioner and the same was the case when the petition was taken up for hearing on 28/9/2005 as well as on 19/10/20056. The respondent no.1 has filed affidavit in reply and has tendered unconditional apology. It is stated that the petitioner is no more and Special Civil Suit No.216 of 1987 came to be decreed in terms of a compromise decree. Special Darkhast No.94 of 1996 was filed by the decree holder i.e. the present respondent no.1 and the same has also been settled in terms of the compromise terms dated 30/4/2005. Pursis came to be filed by the decree holder in Special Darkhast No.41 of 1991 pointing out that Special Darkhast No.94 of :2: 1996 came to be disposed of as settled between the parties. . The learned counsel for the respondent no.1, therefore, submitted that this contempt petition does not survive any further and more so when the Special Civil Suit No.216 of 1987 from which A.O. No.279 of 1988 had arisen has been decided in favour of the respondent no.1 by way of compromise decree, the allegations of contempt cannot be accepted. . The Contempt Petition is hereby dismissed. Rule discharged. (B.H. (B.H. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) Marlapalle,J.) Marlapalle,J.)