..w28.<42me;.6.%).z 1mm wniai mamm aarranéuwn'a? Ema-RW snésT WW§$€I éimanéa HATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Petitioner Respondents Present: The following oral order Mishra, J. This petition is directec (Annexure A/1) passed by the Ch‘ @ Surguja (for shortfthe HIGH COURT OF Cl- Coram : . Hon’ble Shri i Hon’ble Shri I rit PetitiOI Ma. Laxmi Veena Gup Gupta, R/c District—SI 1. State of Departmen D.K.S.Builc Chhattisgal Governmer Manager, E Raipur(C.C 3. The Distrk Supply Ltd. Shri Hemant Gupta Shri Kisho're Bhaduri, State/respondent No. Shri V.R. Tiwari, cour )hirendra Mishra, )ilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, JJ. ! 1C! No.6421 of 2008 Rice Mill, Through — Proprietor, Smt. lta, Aged about 44 years, W/o Dinesh Village Sakalo, Tahsil — Ambikapur, Versus- irguja (C.G.) Chhattisgarh, Through — Secretary, of Food and Civil Supply, Mantralaya,‘ ing, Raipur, C.G. h State Civil Supply Ltd., A t undertaking, through General ial Ashram Campus, Kachahri Chowk, ;.) :t Manager, Chhattisgarh State Civil Ambikapur C.G.) Writ Petition under Artidle 226 of the Constitution of India counsel for the petitioner. 1 Addl. Advocate Genera for the sel for respondents No.2 & 3. ORAL ORDER (Passe of the Court was passed by Dhirendra d on 03. 1 2.2008) against the order dated 16.10.2008 hattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Corporation') whereby the petitioner has 31W W (WW) W W l & @ m mqi$ m 200 3W1 W5 (Wm) snésmrm gmm mga anésT ~ WWW'#WW§R manaerm a?ar%qsné21 been directed to deposit 1236.80 quintals of rice or a sum of Rs.11,65,437.00 in lieu of rice. 2. Learned counsel ‘for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has ialready preferred an appeal aga nst the impugned order Annexure A/1. However, the respondents have not decided the same till date and kept the same pending. They are pressirg hard to make recovery of amount as mentioned in the impugned order. ondents No.2 & 37Corporation, on the other hand, submits that in case he petitioner files a fresh appeal before the Managing Director of the poration against the impugned order (Annexure A/1), the same shall considered and decided on its own merits in accordance with law wit in a period of 4 weeks from the date of filing appeal and in the meanwhle no coercive steps shall be taken for recovery of the amount as mentio ed in the impugned order. 4. In view of the submission f the learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of with iberty to the petitioner to file fresh appeal before the Managing Director o the Corporation against the impugned order (Annexure A/1) within a p riod of 10 days from today. On such appeal being filed, the same shal be considered and decided on its own merits in accordance with law with n further period of 4 weeks from the date of-filing of appeal. ln the meanw ile, no coercive steps shall be taken for \ recovery of the amount as mentio ed in the impugned order till disposal of. 3. Learned counsel for the re N6 ‘\ p r e i the appeal. M Sdl— Deshmukh Sdl- Misma‘ Dilip Raosaheb Judge Dhirendra Judge