•^ C--f r'" & ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGj^K AT BILASPUR WRIT PETTTION N0. /_^<9^/2001 PE'riTTONER RESPOtTOENTS Ishwar^L Prasad Jaiswal S/o. Shri Awa.dh Ram Jaiswal Aged about 26 years Resident of VillageyDongariya VE.RSUS 3 Sfcate of Chhattisge.rh Through the Secretary , Pa.nchaya't &. Gramin Vikas D^K. Bhawan, Raipur 2). The uollector, Ralpu2: . . • 3) The Additional collector Baloda Bazar ." 4) The Sub Divisional Officer(SDO) ^SSa; Raipur ,J^i^^^v 5) The Sarpanch ^.-*"" ^^••" Gram Panchayat-Dongariya^^- ^AW^^^^'"' Tahsil-Simga, ^ " ' ~ '^^^^d^"" District s Raipur '.i..;^'""' T-rRTT PETTrrzON UNDER ARTICLES 226 &; 227.0F THE COHSTITUTIQN OP TNDIA -na-r —5-^353SSSS"!- XI-HC-22 •^^ 7qTqT^^^ -g^^^ ^<r<KH^< 317^T 'qif^ W,P»No.l594/2@Ol ^200 .... ^^.............. WW^F ^W^- 37I^T^T l^ri^FOT^i '^TNE'Tift^ :^...v 'c- '"\-.- ...^- ^T^F'^TT^R Trf^T 26/9/2001 Jai4wai Heard Shri R,S. petitioaer and shri Rajeev ^ for the respondents^ O R The revlsion petiticj CollectQr at Baloda Bazar^ B| against an order of refusal ^Frf^pfr^ 'HN^rf "^ f^Tst <f^^i< ^T 3Tf^Ff 311^1 , .» learned counsel for the hrivastavaf leamed cainsel t> & R n is pendl.ng before ttas Additi.onal aipuro ^his petition is dJl3l<scted to pass awy order of stay by the satdAut^ority* The said ^utbiortty i.3Tto exarairae the entire merit of the case and pass ^ view is to ask the learned inal orcters, Ins-teaid of issuing any further eU.reetion aat th^s stg.ge, jthe best; cc»irse in my dditional Colleetoac to examine < the said revision petitibn 4nd dispo<sle of tte saRie on merit at ttas earliesfe pre£erab.ly »j receipt of this ordero On 7/$/2001 the fol^ -List it on 13/9/20^ interim relief. Ti.lj shall be alloweel to Secretary, if he is On 13/9/2001 it was —InteriBnrorder passej con&i nue until this] ithin one month frcm the date of owing interljn order was passed^ 1 for consideratioa o£ 1 then tfcie petijtioner continue jas Panphayat continaing thisl daytt< ordered as followss d on 7/9/200^1 shall itaxi is reache^" ^ •»2 [^t^ ^R^^t ^ ^ ^•^ ^n^r-GFT 1^;TT^3TT^T ^Rf^ ^TT ^Tlit^T q^ch^yci?ygq^T) r3i2: W^T'^H^RTrftn <^ 1^fa 41 <i ^i^^ ^ 'fe^st 'd^R^R ^ 3:rf^R ^TT^T . ^ • <"^ This raatter has beei^ talcen ap t®daythereafter* The interim order passed on 7/9/2001 doesnot any clarifjlcation as the|ce is nojaR^igui.fcy ia the order» There£ca:e»it wijll be fair t petitioner is coiatinuing to continue until the re decided» Th®pet.lfeloa is, tbus, disposed @£» Certified cepy a^ per r^iles^ if the writ till date, sbe shall be a^l<E5»ed ^rr^ ision ge^ition is fii^clly Sd/- Chief Justice