1 SA 243/2010 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 243 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. P.S. Dani i/b Mr. S.R. Ronghe for the appellants. Mr. Pratap P. Patil for respondent no.1. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATE : 2ND SEPTEMBER 2011 P.C. : 1. The appellants are the original plaintiffs. They filed a suit against the respondents for an injunction restraining them from disturbing their possession of the suit property. The trial Court held that the appellants had failed to prove the possession. The lower appellate Court on re- 2 SA 243/2010 appreciation of the evidence has confirmed the finding that the appellants are not in possession of the suit property. 2. The question whether the appellants are and on the date of the suit were in possession of the suit property is a pure question of fact. Both the Courts have concurrently held against the appellants. No question of law, much less a substantial question of law, arise in this second appeal. The appeal is dismissed. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)