^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (Q No. 772 of 2009 Petitioner New Fafadeeh Bazar Vyapad Saagh, fhrough its President Ganshyam Raju Tiwari, aged about 33 years, S/o Late Shri B.P.Tiwari, R/o Maadir Ward, Fafadeeh Raipur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, urbaa Development Departoaient, D.K.S, Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The CoUector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Municipal Corporation, Raipur, through the Comiinissioner, Raipur (C. G.) (Writ Petition under Aiticle 226 ofthe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, Advocate for fhe peUtioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for flie respondents No. 1 aad 2. Shri Paiikaj Agarwal, Advocate for th.e respondeut No.3. O RD E R (orall (Passed on this 11th day ofAugust, 2009) Heard, 1, Leamed counsel appeamig for tlie petitioner, on instructions, subniits fhat fhe petitioner does not waat to press this petition on nierits at fhis stage, However, fhe respondent-Corporation inay be directed to cousider and decide fhe pendiiig /representation dated 19.rl.2009 (Annexure P/10), on fhe humaaitariaii ground, as expeditiously as passible. 2, Shn Paakaj Agarvval, leanied counsel appeai-mg for the respondent No.S/Corporaton subniits that, though it is dtfficult to accommodate fhe members of fhe petitioner association at fhe places m-entioned ia tlie representation, stiU it wiU be considered on humaaitariaa ground aad appropriate order may be passed wifhia a period of four v^eeks froni fhe date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3. In view of fhe clear stateiuent inade by leamed counsel appearing for the respondent/Corporation, accordmg to learaed counsel appearuig for fhe petitioner, nofhirig suxvives for adjudication. 4. Accordmgly, fhe petition staads dispbsed of No order asto costs. Tliakur Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge