IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.9509 of 2010 SUNIL YADAV Son of Ram Govind Yadav Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 26.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(x) of SC/ST Act. Learned counsel submits that there is no direct or indirect allegation against the petitioner. He further submits that he resides at Amritsar where he earns his livelihood. He further submits that petitioner has been unnecessary dragged in this case. It appears that four persons have been killed in the name of thieves. The Sessions Judge has recorded that during investigation the name of the petitioner along with six other persons came to light, as persons involved in the instant case, and six persons are facing trial. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. However, if petitioner surrenders before the court below (Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in Ara (Town) P.S. case no. 166 of 2006) within six weeks from today, the same would be disposed of without being prejudiced by this order. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)