MIGHCOURTOFGHHATrae^^A^Lfflll.^^ffi WritPeflfion (O No. %15<»f» T Petltloner Hari Narayan Triwdi S/o Shri Narmada Prasad Trivedl, «®ed about 34 yeais, Occuprifon- Advocate, resident of Near Bus Stand, Gariyaband, District- Raipur (G.G.) Respondents Versus 1. Stats of Chhattegarh, through the Secretary Law Dapartment, O.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur 2. The Chhatfsgarh High Court, through Hs R^istrar General, Chhattsgarh High Court BMaspur 3. District Judge, Raipur, C3istrict- Raipur (C.G.) 4. Additional Dlstrtet Judge, Gariyaband, Ralpur, Distrfct-Raipur 5. The Goltector, Rdpur, District- Raipur(C.G.). ¥- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICl.E 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INNA (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri. J.) Dr. San(^et Sharma, Aelvocats fbrthe petitloner. Shri Suryakant Mishra, Panet lawyer for UN> responctent No. 1/State ORDER (Passed on this 17" day ofSeptember, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing ibr the petWoner, on instruGtions, seelcs permlssion of the Court to withdraw ttiis petBion. 2. It is ordered accordlngly. 3. Consequwrtly, the writ petltion Is dismissed ^ wittidrawn. B/- Sd/- Satish K-Aguiliotri