IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 13639 of 2007 Date of Decision : November 12, 2010. Moti Lal son of Shri Ram Chander ..... Petitioner. Versus. State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. JEYAPAUL. Present:- Mr. Mani Ram Verma and Mr. Nipun Verma, Advocates, for the petitioner. Mr. Sukhvinder Singh Nara, DAG Haryana, for the respondent-State. M. JEYAPAUL, J. (ORAL). The order of dismissal dated 27.04.2007 passed by the 3rd respondent/District Primary Education Officer, Rewari, against the petitioner Moti Lal, retired JBT Teacher, Government Primary School, Khandora, Bawal-II, Rewari, is under challenge before this Court. Producing a copy of the current proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent in Order No. E-I/2010/669-98, dated 13.08.2010 and also on getting instructions from Mr. Yasin Mohammad, Assistant attached to the office of 2nd respondent, who was present in the open Court, learned Government pleader for respondents No. 1 to 3 submits that the impugned order of dismissal passed by the 3rd respondents on 27.04.2007 was withdrawn as defective and arbitrary in the eyes of law. Inasmuch as the strange order of dismissal passed by the 3rd respondent on 27.04.2007 giving retrospective effect from 13.05.1987 has been now withdrawn, as wisdom has dawned on the 3rd respondent, the respondents cannot withhold the pensionary benefits the petitioner is entitled CWP No. 13639 of 2007 -2- to in the face of withdrawal of the order of dismissal dated 27.04.2010, passed by the 3rd respondent. Therefore, the question of quashing of the impugned order does not survive for consideration. But inasmuch as the order of dismissal dated 27.04.2007 was withdrawn as per proceedings of 3rd respondent dated 13.08.2010, the respondents are directed to calculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioner alongwith statutory interest forthwith and release the same within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. With the above direction, the present writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (M. JEYAPAUL) JUDGE November 12, 2010. sjks.