:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX TAX TAX APPEAL NO.1029 OF 2007 APPEAL NO.1029 OF 2007 APPEAL NO.1029 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. Yangste Trading Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent Mrs.Devki Iyer for Appellant. Mr.J.D.Mistry a/w.Mr.P.C.Tripathi i/b.Raj Darak for respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & :- V.C.DAGA & :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 22ND APRIL,2009 : 22ND APRIL,2009 : 22ND APRIL,2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard. 2. Having seen the order of the Tribunal, it is clear that the Tribunal has applied its mind and relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Max India Ltd.(2007) of Income Tax Vs. Max India Ltd.(2007) of Income Tax Vs. Max India Ltd.(2007) 295 295 295 ITR 282 (SC) ITR 282 (SC) ITR 282 (SC). The view taken by the Tribunal cannot be faulted. There is no substantial question of law involved in the appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)