In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-24555 of 2009 (O&M) Deenu and others ..... Petitioners vs State of Haryana ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. GS Virk, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mrs. Ritu Punj, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate, for the complainant. Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he does not press the present petition for petitioner no. 8 Jakir son of Chandru as he has not joined the investigation. Accordingly, the petition qua petitioner no. 8 Jakir son of Chandru is dismissed as not pressed. As far as other petitioners are concerned, it was submitted that civil dispute between the parties in the form of suit for declaration and permanent possession of the land in question filed on 21.1.2009 by petitioner no. 1 was already pending when the present occurrence allegedly took place on 26.1.2009. The FIR in question was registered more than five months thereafter. All the offences are bailable except offence under Sections 149 and 379 IPC. In fact after the filing of the suit by petitioner no. 1, the complainant had tried to take forcible possession of the land from the petitioners. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submitted that considering the allegations in the FIR where the petitioners had harvested the crop from the land which was not in their possession, they do not deserve the concession of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the complainant submitted that against petitioner no. 14 Hasan son of Munsi non-bailable warrants have been issued by Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur Jhirka and considering his conduct he does not deserve the anticipatory bail. After hearing learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that FIR in question was registered after 5 months of the alleged occurrence, the interim bail granted to the petitioners vide order dated 3.9.2009, except petitioners no. 8 and 14, is made absolute. The petition is disposed of. 6.10.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge