THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.22985 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner is studying B.E (IT) Course in the 2nd respondent college. She appeared in the I-Year examination in April/May 2002. Out of 13 subjects, she was declared to have passed in four subjects. She submitted an application for revaluation of the answer scripts in four subjects viz., Mathematics-I, Chemistry, Programming in C and C++ and Engineering Graphics. The same resulted in the petitioner being declared pass in the subject of ‘Programming in C and C++’. The grievance of the petitioner is that the revaluation of the answer scripts in other three subjects was not proper. She prays for further revaluation of those answer scripts. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing counsel for the respondents. The facility of revaluation itself is an exception to the ordinary rule. The transparency and objectivity of the revaluation undertaken by the respondents is evident from the fact that the petitioner was declared passed in a subject, in which she failed earlier. The petitioner cannot expect that revaluation must invariably result in award of higher marks. At any rate, there is no provision for further revaluation over and above the one which is undertaken earlier. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 27.10.2009 JSU THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.22985 of 2009 Date: 27.10.2009 JSU