IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35771 of 2008 CHANDESHWAR PRASAD SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.09.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Renewing the prayer for bail in a case under Sections 376 of the Penal Code it is submitted that cognizance against co-accused has been quashed in revision. It is also emphasized from the complaint that as per allegations the victim was sexually assaulted. Nonetheless she was willing to accept the compensation of Rs. One Lac which accused no. 1 received from the petitioner when she has a grievance that it has not been paid to her. Submission is of false implication. Final form has been submitted. Differing with the same cognizance has been taken. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Saran at Chapra in Ishapur PS Case No. 35 of 2006, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)