CR No.6867 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.6867 of 2010 (O&M) Decided on : 25-10-2010 Subhash Gaur ....Petitioner VERSUS Nitya Nand and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr.J.P.Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. MAHESH GROVER, J The only grievance that has been made in the instant petition is that the parties to the litigation had made a statement in the year 2008 admitting a settlement inter se between them but the learned Trial Court has not decided the suit for no ostensible reason. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if some directions are issued to the learned Trial Court to dispose of the matter expeditiously. He also states that the parties are still standing by the compromise and there has been no change in the situation as far as the petitioner and the respondents are concerned regarding the factum of compromise. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered opinion that the revision petition can be disposed of without issuance of notice of motion as no prejudice is likely to be caused to the respondents in the eventuality of the prayer of the petitioner being CR No.6867 of 2010 (O&M) 2 answered. Consequently, the revision petition is disposed of with an expectation from the learned Trial Court that it shall decide the matter in question as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six months from today by taking into consideration the fact that the parties have settled the matter. Disposed of. October 25, 2010 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge