I@ 8g Cw§\ IN THE C.G.HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIL ASPUR. WRIT yETITION N0. QK / ,Zf/(‘V E’m'tioner: Riazuddin Khan 3/0 Mohd. Erliussajm R/Q Rasulpur, Ambikapur, Surguja, Chhattisgarh‘ spondents: 01‘ Gavemment 0f CMlattisgaIh hough it‘s yChiaf premiws, Secretary, Raipur, C. G. (1G. State Secretariat; D Kaf'f-{ospital Pn'nciple Seuetary" (Home), Govt of ChhattiSgaIh, Chhal'tiggaxh State Secretan'm, DK Hospital Premisss, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Inspector General of Folios, Bilaspur Range, Bilaspur Chlmttisgarh. Supd‘t. Of PoEice, Baikunthpm/ Koria, Clmattisgarh. Cammamiant, 12th Ban, SAF, Sakan': Bilaspur, CG. Versus W'rit Petition u/a articie 226/ 227 0f the constitutian of India. m. ‘ur—‘w— XI»HC-22 ,w‘/ yg. WW, WW6, W am m Wmw‘3'P‘NO"”‘4'8/‘29Q%t 200 V ma mmmw - L mam WWI‘fwm aamm 1.522601 : mr.’ E;K’.,singh for th e“ petitioner o MrQGautam Bhaduri £0 No return has been f However, onrthe basis of d silbmits £hat in fact a com” Competent Authority for: ta action. Mr Bhaduri submits Court clearly as to how the £rom lssuing the order of worderdt. 1’9.2.2ooo_ in respect. of four persons the appointment to the post of the writ petitioner ri It is state& that the pers been given appointment to it is contended that éwitho _ has not been given any or peotor. ”a : * Mr‘orR.K.singh learne that there is no further co petitioner in the matter of ““2”. the State . leé on behalf of the respondente. erits available on f‘e’Eord,Mr e Bhaduri cation has been sent to the g necessary and in £act favourable at he is not able to inform this competent authority was prevented. ointment to the writ petitioner. exure P—l was a selection made cluding the writ petitioner giving of assistant Sub Inspector. The namei esx at S.No.2 of the said order. at S.No. 1,3 and 4 have already post o£ Assistant 3ub Inspector. assigning any reason the petitioner of posting as Assistant Sub xnSa counsel for the petitioner submits dition to be fulfilled by the appointment and posting of the [new or m k p a n n g a o t u d d m i 'n h s e g # «m am iaijcE ’ ’ m ‘afE‘n' WW<WJ§ VWWWf1§FgQWfW QKafmanEm writ petitioner 5s mm #ssistant Sub Inspector: inasmuch as character ceftlzEicatlcn has already been carried—out by the Pompetent authority. So also physical e11gibillt duly issued by the compe ent authority, Annexure -4 dated 23 3 2000 indi ates the selection cf wr‘it petitioner, for appo ntment of Assistant Inspector . In View of the afore aid facts and circum- stances of the case it a pears t6 me that there is 2 r order of posting i ceriuflcate has been no reasonable groun%§¢% lssu of the writ petitioner as Assxstant Sub Inspector. to be untair that this petitioner should have been singled‘ out amoné £our persons who- competent authority for ppointment and posting as ASI. in ‘the result,this iresfpon'dents are airecte" in favour of the: writ petitioner as Assistant pos ting Sub inspeeta‘ wi thin order . It appears to me iA, ' whoa; y inst/2w SOIXX), and treated difterently e selected by the said etitmn is amowea. The~ to issue an order of sdl- re V *Chief ”5‘35,“ 15 idays of receiipt of this /