^ '^WMM. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH ,^ W.P. N0.^3J^ /2005 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS y :;r M ^^ ;y y c^'.^^•° .<^ \^' "^- ^^5^P- ^w^ .^ y ^^^ ^^^^ s"cl^^ '•\^ v^ ^ ^ /^l ^^y s,--,.^,^; Ram Lal Prajapatj / S/o. Sohan Lal Prajapati Aged about 48 years, R/o. Tifara Bilaspur , Tahsil and District -Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS ,1; State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Revenue D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Ram Avtar Sharma S/o. Not known 3. Madhu Sharma W/o Ram Avtar Sharma Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Chichirda No.2 and 3 R/o vill.Chichirda , Bilaspur (C.G.) The Collector Bilaspur (C.g.) ^. Nayab Tahsildar Tah. Sakri, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 6. Officer Incharge P.S. Chakarbhata, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) 7. Supdt. of Police Bilaspur, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) // / ,/ (p // 2 // WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22' 3T?^T^)T ^{ra'w^T ^Ht^^rf^T V-. /. c. , -"• / ^ <es 3^ ^MKrt^, ^Tfl^^Ko, fadl^y 3TT^T'-ra^ ^TR^[T^rRT^r>^.f..^.-.}. W5; 2003' ^l^l^^dl^R^f Siiri'Gautam Khetrapal, Shri Parag Kotccha, P.L.) Heard,'. The m.ain. gri^vaiice of fl|ie respondent Nos,2 & 3 hsve petitioiier?s agricultural laiid bj CQunsel fbr thc pctniDnj of respondent Nos.2 & S.the respoudeut No,5~Naib Tehsild4r. Iie is not decidm.g the. sam.e, No,5 be directed to decide the| accordancc with law, to whic3i omectton. Having heam. leamed cc|un to fhe facte aiid c.ii'-cuiii^taricies Telisildar, Sakii, District applicatiou illcd by tlic law, if uecessarv, after hearmgl With the directbn afbre€ ConsequenUy, M.(W.)P.| aJso staiicl disposed of\ Ccrtified cop3r as per nil^s, pctltKpucr <=hi^f<n4)^ ^i^QiT^tel<ft<Ri<^i< ^3Tf^T^n^?T lcoiuisel for the petitiouer, for fh.c Statc. petitioner iii tliis writ petitioti 1s tliat. ob^Btructed the passage which goes to tlie fij-dng soine woodeii logs. ^r •szibinite that. against the said action Ipetitoner moved aii application bcTbre ld4r. Sakri, who is respous&le officer, biit IThereibre, he sixbmits Uiat. respondent applicatiou Bioved by the petitiouer io. lcanicd conuscl for thc State has uo cc|unsel for the parties and having regard of tlie case, respondent No.S-Naib $ilaspur is directed to decide the on 30,6,2005 in accordan.cc with respondent Nos.2 & 3. (aid, the petition staads disposed of No.2846/05 aiid I'.A. No.6404/05 Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (^y^)