'7 .. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR (C.G.t 77~~~ 7- W.P. No.[ 117/2005 PETITIONER Noni Bai W/o Manohar, Aged about- 55 years, R/o. Village- Gorkhapali, Tahsil- Sakti, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 'cf VERSUS BiSgS* 3»IB RESPONDENTS : ]/'', State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretaiy, Revenue O '7 -Deparbcnent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, c^ \.^-^. .^•^^" ^""^•y^ ^ ^•^""".W " ...••••'"[" ^^ ?^S>!;-T-^ ' District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh). The Collector, Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). ^i^^ •^•-•"^ ^ The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sakd, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. The above named petitioner respectfully beg to subrait as "W^ XI-HC-78 ^ET^iraTcCT, W^WTS, ftrtixiyt ITPTOT^TT^ B W^200 gn^ntRlR-li* nsTrsTi^yriFWP ^-{ -77Vi)avL g^T8R^ftel ^^(WR('i?fgcra) [3TI^?[ ipraferifriWBt'^fe^'d^" ^arf^rai^n 11.5.2005 Patel counsel &r the Paael Lawyer for fhe Shri Pushpendra K^ petitioner. Shri Parag Kotec] respondents/ State. The petitioner has filed| an application dated 21.2.2005 before fhe Respondent No. |3 for grant of BIiooxni Swami rights on the basis ofthe or^er dated 30.10.2001 passed ia W.P.No. 2632/2000 (Chhab? Das & others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh aud anof4er) aad on the basis of fhe cireular dated 28.2,2003. The petitioaer has filed this petition under Article 226/2^7 of the Constitution of India seekmg a direction against th^ Respondent No.3 for deciding fhe said appUcation within ]a period of one inonfh. The petitioner fails to disclose a^ to which legal right of the petitioner is in&inged necessi1)atiag filing pf this petition. No cause of action has been discldsed. The petition is accoidit(gly dismissed on the fact as stated hereinabove. Consequ^ntly M(W}P No. 1387/2005, I.A.No. 3392/2005 and I.A.NIJ). 3393/2005 stand disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnjhotri Judge