HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL (Court’s Order whether the case is or not approved for reporting) Description of the case Civil Revision No. 14/08 Diwakar Aggarwal Vs. Rajendra Prasad Aggarwal Approved for reporting Date of Decision: 21.02.2008 Initial of Judge: ............................... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, .............................. HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CIVIL REVISION NO.14 OF 2008 Diwakar Aggarwal S/o late Durga Ram Aggarwal R/o Yamunatat Unfiled Nagar, Post Office- Vikash Nagar, District Dehradun. ...............Revisionist/Plaintiff Versus 1. Rajendra Prasad Aggarwal @ Inder, S/o Sri Shanti Prasad Aggarwal, R/o Behind State Bank, Vikasnagar, District Dehradun. 2. Udai Prakash, S/o Sri Maharaja Rajendra Prakash, R/o Kolagarh, Tea Estate, Dehradun, Through its General Power of Attorney Holder Sri Brij Bhushan, S/o Sri Shanti Swaroop, R/o Fatehpur, Post Office Harbartpu, District-Dehradun. .................Respondent. Dated: 21.02.2008 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Sri P.C. Maulekhi, counsel for the revisionist. This is an appeal filed by the plaintiff/ revisionist. 2. By the present Civil Revision filed under Section 115 of the Code Civil Procedure, revisionist has prayed for setting aside the judgment and order dated 25.12008 passed by the Civil Judge (Sr.Div.), Dehradun in O.S. No. 473 of 2003, whereby the application for amendment filed by the revisionist /plaintiff has been partly allowed regarding the impleadment of respondent no. 2 as defendant no. 2 in the said suit and rejected the subsequent amendments ad sought by the revisionist/ plaintiff in his amendment in his amendment application. 3. Counsel for the plaintiff/ appellant has submitted that at the time of filing of the suit No. 473 of 2003 Diwakar Aggarwal Vs. Rajendra Prasad, the respondent no. 2 Sri Udai Prakash was not a party in the suit and after impleading the respondent no. 2 as party in the said suit, the subsequent pleadings against the respondent no. 2 as per para no. 4 of the amendment application are necessary to be impleaded in order to establish his case against the respondent no.2, but the Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Dehradun has not considered his application. 4. The Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Dehradun while partly allowing the amendment application has recoded a finding to the following effect: “ijUrq izkFkZuk i= esa oknh }kjk okni= dh pj.k la[;k 12 ds ckn ubZ pj.k ubZ pj.k la[;k c<+k;s tkus dh tks izkFkZuk dh gS mlds voyksdu ls fofnr gksrk gS fd 12d] 12[k] o 12 x izLrkfor la’kks/ku ds varxZr oknh }kjk mn; izdk’k }kjk ;ksftr izkFkZuki= 193d okLrs cuk;s tkus i{kdkj] mDr izkZFkuki= dkds bl U;k;ky; }kjk fujLr fd;s tkus rFkk rRi’pkr ekuuh; U;k;ky; }kjk bl U;k;ky; ds vkns’k dks viLr fd;s tkus ds rF; ds lEcU/k esa gS] tks lHkh rF; iwoZ ls gh i=koyh ij miyC/k gS RkFkk bl okn ds lUnHkZ esa fofHkUu U;k;ky;ksa esa pyh dk;Zokgh o mlesa ikfjr vkns’k ls lEcfU/kr gS] ftudh ckcr rF; la’kksf/kr }kjk okn esa lek;ksftr fd;k tkuk U;k;ky; U;k;ksfpr ugha ikrk gS D;kfd mDr lHkh vkns’k o izFkZuki= i=koyh ij miyC/k gSa rFkk okn dh dk;Zokgh ls lEcfU/kr gSA tgkW rd izLrj 12 ?k o 12 M esa mYysf[kr rF;ksa dk lEcU/k gSA oknh mu leLr rF;ksa ds lEcU/k esa izfroknh la[;k 2 dk izfroknhi= vkus ds i’pkr [k.Mu esa izfrmRrj nsus gsrq Lora= gS rFkk tcfd i=koyh ij izfroknh la[;k 2 }kjk dksbZ Hkh vfHkdFku nkf[ky ugha fd;k x;k gS D;ksafd izfroknh la[;k 2 dks ekUkuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns’kkuqlkj i{kdkj cuk;k x;k gS vRk% izfroknh la[;k 2 ds vfHkdFku ds vHkko esa oknh ds }kjk izfroknh la[;k 2 ds fo:) tks rF; la’kks/ku izkFkZuki= esa fd;s x;s gS mu rF; lekfgr djus dh vuqefr nsus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; izrhr ugh gksrk gSA rn~uqlkj izkFkZuki= vkaf’kd :i ls Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA** 5. However, in view of the above, without entering into the merit of the controversy, the Civil Judge (Sr. Division) may consider the application of the plaintiff for amendment in the suit after the written statement is filed by the respondent no.2. 6. Subject to aforesaid observation, Civil Revision is dismissed at this stage. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) 21.02.2008 Rathour