IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 17TH JUNE 2011 / 27TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 37328 of 2010(M) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. MR.RAGHURAJAN, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.P.K.MOHAN RESIDING AT 18/46-2,RADHA NIVAS, SIVA NAGAR,T.V.S.NAGAR, COMBATORE-641025 2. S.BHOOPATHY, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.M.RAMASWAMY,R/A.1831,LGB COLONY,OLYMBUS, TRICHY ROAD, RAMANATHAPURAM,COMBATORE-641045 BY ADVS. SRI.SREELAL N.WARRIER SRI.B.RAGHUNANDANAN SMT.A.SREEKALA (VAIKOM) RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. SUB REGISTRAR, SUB REGISTRA'S OFFICE, AGALI, MANARKAD TALUK, PALGHAT DISTRICT-678581 2. INDIRA, W/O.P.K.RAMADAS, PULIPRAKKUTTIKATIL, VADAKKUM BHAGOM, SREEMULANAGARAM,ALUVA TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683 580. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. M.H. HANILKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 37328/2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF REGISTERED SALE DEED NO.1320/2009 OF SRO, AGALI EXECUTED BY INDIRA IN FAVOUR OF PETITIONERS. P2: COPY OF CERTIFICATE NO.2196 OF 1974 ISSUED BY THE LAND TRIBUNAL. P3: COPY OF REGD. SALE DEED NO.1570 OF 2005 OF SRO, AGALI. P4: COPY OF POSSESSION CERTIFICATE. P5: COPY OF RECTIFICATION DEED WITH FILING SHEET EXECUTED BY INDIRA IN FAVOUR OF PETITIONERS AND PRESENTED BEFORE THE RESPONDENT, SUB REGISTRAR. P6: COPY OF OBJECTION NO.2/2010 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT, SUB REGISTRAR. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P (C) No . 37328 of 2010 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 17th June , 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court, seeking to quash Ext. P6 objection raised by the first respondent, with regard to the registration sought for in respect of Ext. P5 Rectification Deed sought to be effected with regard to Ext. P1 Sale Deed. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after issuance of Ext. P6 dated 10.11.2010, the concerned RDO had occasion to consider the matter, who passed Ext. P7 order on 11.02.2011, which in fact has nullified the effect of Ext. P6 and in view of Ext. P7, the objection raised by the respondent refusing to register Ext. P5 Rectification Deed is not liable to be sustained any further. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 4. There is no dispute with regard to the turn of events, leading to passing of Ext. P7 order by the concerned Revenue Divisional Officer. In the said circumstances, the first respondent is directed to register Ext. P5 rectification deed as sought for, forthwith, subject to the condition that, the same is otherwise proper in all respects. Sd/- P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd /