IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1387 of 2011 NARENDRA JHA, SON OF LATE GANESH JHA, R/O VILL+ P.O. SONEPUR, P.S. KATRA, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. …… PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUZAFFARPUR. 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT RAJ OFFICER, MUZAFFARPUR. 4. THE CONDUCTING OFFICER-CUM-DY. COLLECTOR, LAND REFORMS, MUZAFFARPUR (WEST). 5. THE CONDUCTING OFFICER-CUM-DY. COLLECTOR, LAND REFORMS, MUZAFFARPUR, (EAST). … RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 27.06.2011. The submission of the learned counsel that a fresh inquiry has been initiated despite earlier exoneration of some of the charges is not required to be looked into now specially, in view of the fact that the petitioner has not been issued a second show-cause and the authorities are yet to make up their mind on all the objections which may have been raised by the petitioner or would be advised to file in the matter. If orders, having civil consequences are passed, surely petitioner has remedy. The Court would not like to preempt any action which may be required to be taken in the totality of the situation by interfering in this writ at this stage. The writ is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate steps as and when required i.e. after a decision is taken by the disciplinary authority. Ibrar/- ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J )