HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 4088 of 2011 Dated: 22.09.2011 Between: Smt. Giybdaka Oadnannam, R.R.District. … Petitioner And Sri Palle Veeraiah and 2 others. … Respondents HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 4088 of 2011 O R D E R: The revision petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.168 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Vikarabad. The suit is filed against the respondents herein for partition and separate possession of 1/3rd share of the plaintiff in the suit schedule property. The defendants filed written statement contesting the suit. During the trial, the affidavit of the plaintiff in lieu of her chief- examination as P.W.1 was filed and on 18.7.2011 when she appeared before the Court for further chief-examination, Exs.A-1 to A-12 documents were marked through her. While the matter was coming up for cross-examination, the plaintiff filed I.A.No.656 of 2011 with a prayer to eschew her chief-affidavit, dated 7.7.2011 stating that she was wrongly advised by her counsel and the contents of paras 2 & 4 of the said affidavit were prepared contrary to the plaint averments. It was also pleaded that on 25.7.2011 she had engaged a new counsel and then she came to know that the contents of her chief-affidavit were contrary to the plaint. Thus it was prayed to eschew her chief-affidavit, dated 7.7.2011. The said application was dismissed with costs by the Court below by order dated 10.8.2011 and aggrieved by the same the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the material available on record, I do not find any justifiable reason to hold that the order under Revision suffered from any patent error of fact or law warranting interference by this Court in exercise of the jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. As rightly held by the Court below, it is impermissible under law to grant such a relief in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 151 of C.P.C. No other provision could be pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner which empowers the Court to eschew the evidence of a party at his instance. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. _______________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 22.09.2011 KLP