1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.61 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.61 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.61 OF 2006 IN IN IN LETTER PATENT APPEAL (st).NO.5607 OF 2006 LETTER PATENT APPEAL (st).NO.5607 OF 2006 LETTER PATENT APPEAL (st).NO.5607 OF 2006 Smt.Vaishali Bhalchandra Bhoite ...Applicant Smt.Vaishali Bhalchandra Bhoite ...Applicant Smt.Vaishali Bhalchandra Bhoite ...Applicant Vs. Vs. Vs. University of Pune & Ors. ...Respondents University of Pune & Ors. ...Respondents University of Pune & Ors. ...Respondents WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.62 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.62 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.62 OF 2006 IN IN IN LETTER PATENT APPEAL (st.)NO.6214 OF 2006 LETTER PATENT APPEAL (st.)NO.6214 OF 2006 LETTER PATENT APPEAL (st.)NO.6214 OF 2006 Narayan Vasudeo Mule ...Applicant Narayan Vasudeo Mule ...Applicant Narayan Vasudeo Mule ...Applicant Vs. Vs. Vs. University of Pune & Ors. ...Respondents University of Pune & Ors. ...Respondents University of Pune & Ors. ...Respondents ------ ------ ------ Mr.A.V.Anturkar with Sugandh B. Deshmukh for Mr.A.V.Anturkar with Sugandh B. Deshmukh for Mr.A.V.Anturkar with Sugandh B. Deshmukh for Applicants Applicants Applicants Mr. R.M.Patne, A.G.P. for Respondents 2 & 3 Mr. R.M.Patne, A.G.P. for Respondents 2 & 3 Mr. R.M.Patne, A.G.P. for Respondents 2 & 3 CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. DATED: 3RD APRIL, 2006 DATED: 3RD APRIL, 2006 DATED: 3RD APRIL, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 1. Heard. 1. Heard. 2. Delay of 3 days and 9 days respectively in 2. Delay of 3 days and 9 days respectively in 2. Delay of 3 days and 9 days respectively in filing Letter Patent Appeal, considering the facts filing Letter Patent Appeal, considering the facts filing Letter Patent Appeal, considering the facts disclosed in the application, is condoned as we are disclosed in the application, is condoned as we are disclosed in the application, is condoned as we are satisfied that there is sufficient cause for delay in satisfied that there is sufficient cause for delay in satisfied that there is sufficient cause for delay in filing the Appeal. The applications stand disposed filing the Appeal. The applications stand disposed filing the Appeal. The applications stand disposed of. of. of. 2 (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.) (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.) (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.)