^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Sinale Bench : Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh. J. Apoellarrt Ciaimant Respondente Non-appHcant IVI.A.fClNo.572/2008 Ganesh Agrawal, S/o Bhagwan Agrawal, aged about 24 years, Occupation Grocery shop, R/o Near Saraswati Shishu Mandir Schooi, Ward No.10, Akharabhatha, TahsilSakti P.0. Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (QG.) Versus 1.. Bhishmdev Upadhayay S/o Babu Lai Upadhyay, aged about 29 years, R/o . Village Gourmuda, Police Station, Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) {Driver} 2. NareshKumar Agrawal, S/o Vishnudayal Agrawal, aged about 28 years, R/o Budhwari Bazar Sakti,Tahsi) Sakti, Distt. Janjgir Champa (C.G.) (Owner) 3. United India Insurance Company Limited, TP.Nagar, Korba, Police Station Korba, Tahsil & Distt. Korba (C.G.) (Insyrer) MisceUaneQysAj3RealunderS€€rtion17^ofthe^^^^^ Present : Shri P. K. Patel, counsel for the appeliant. ORAL ORDER (Passed on ^0 of IViay, 2008) Heard on admission. 2. In this appeal for enhancement of compensation, the appellant is aggrieved by the award dated 28.02.2008 passed io claim case No. 88/2007 by theAdditionaJ Motor AccidentsClaJms Tribunai, Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa (henceforth 'the Tribunal') wherein in an jnjury case compensatjon of Rs.20.000/- has been awarded. 3. Jt is not in dispute in this appeal that the appellant/daimant did not suffer-any permanent ctisablemenf due to the acddent. The treating physjcian Dr. R.L.Thakur, A.W.3 was examined. A copy pf his statement has been fjled as Annexure A/1. It does not revea! that any grievous jnjury was sustained by the appetlant/daimant. fn thjs view of the matter, 1 -2-- am of the considered opinion that compensation of Rs.20,000/- awarded by the Tribunal does not call for any interference in this appeal. 4. The appeal, being devoid of any merit, is dismissed at the stage of admission. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge Gopaf