IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:12.03.2010 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M. CHOCKALINGAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S. KARNAN HCP. No.340 of 2010 Jayanthi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector of Police, Kandamangalam Police Station, Villupuram District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of police, V.O.C. Street, Villupuram District. 3. Panchamurthy ... Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, to direct the first and second respondents to take necessary action against the third respondent in getting the release of the petitioner's husband Ganesan, S/o Sivanandam, aged 37 years, who is in the illegal custody of the third respondent and produce him before this Court for necessary action and also to pass suitable orders to hand over the petitioner's husband Ganesan to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr. Philip Ravindran Jesudoss For Respondents: Mr. V.R. Balasubramanian, Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 and R2 Mr. A. Ramesh for R3 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by M. CHOCKALINGAM,J) This is an application brought forth by one Jayanthi, alleging that her husband was taken by the third respondent on 28.4.2009 on the representation that he would secure job for him at Banagalore, but he was not returned. Hence, a complaint was given on 30.4.2009, but no step has been taken. 2. When the above petition is taken up for enquiry, learned counsel appearing for the third respondent represents that it is true, the petitioner's husband and the third respondent went to Bangalore for seeking employment, but he was found missing from 2.5.2009. A complaint was given to Nelamangala police station and a case was registered on 26.5.2009. The investigation is actually on. 3. According to the learned counsel for the State, all the above factual position actually came to the knowledge of the respondent-police at the time of enquiry. They also filed a report. The case was registered by Karnataka police and they are also on search. Hence, there is no question of considering the Habeas Corpus Petition by this Court. 4. After recording the statement of the parties as stated above, this Habeas Corpus Petition is disposed of. ssa. Sd/- Asst. Registrar //True Copy// Sub Asst. Registrar To 1.The Inspector of Police, Kandamangalam Police Station, Villupuram District. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of police, V.O.C. Street, Villupuram District. + 1 cc to Mr. Philip Ravindran Jesudoss, Advocate SR No.16945 + 1 cc to Mr. A. Ramesh, Advocate SR No.17175 VSN(CO) SR/24.3.2010 H.C.P. No.340 of 2010 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/