IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 1070 of 2005 (O&M) Date of decision : November 16, 2007 Sahib Singh ....Appellant versus Smt. Bala Devi and others ....Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pritam Pal Present : Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the appellant Pritam Pal,J. (Oral) This regular second appeal has been directed against the judgment and decree dated 18.10.2003 whereby suit for permanent injunction filed by the appellant regarding vacant place marked as ABCD within the Abadi Deh was dismissed. Thereafter appeal filed by the plaintiff has also been dismissed by learned Additional District Judge vide judgment and decree dated 7.10.2004. Both the courts have given concurrent finding that the plaintiff has failed to prove his possession over the suit property. A perusal of the impugned judgments and decrees goes a long way to show that the findings arrived at by the courts below are not unreasonable or perverse. Learned counsel for the appellant could not make out any substantial question of law for consideration of this Court. Dismissed in limine. RSA No. 1070 of 2005 (O&M) -2- Since the appeal is devoid of any merit, so there is no necessity to pass any order on the application for condonation of delay. ( Pritam Pal ) November 16, 2007 Judge 'dalbir'