THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1163 OF 2010 DATED: 17-02-2011. Between B.Mallikarjun … Petitioner And Smt.Neelam …Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1163 OF 2010 ORDER: This revision is directed against the order, dated 23-02-2010, in I.A.No.72 of 2010 in R.C.No.281 of 2008, on the file of the Principal Rent Controller cum 12th Junior Civil Judge, Hyderabad, whereunder and whereby the application filed to issue summons to the son of the landlady and postman of Banjarahills Post Office, Hyderabad, was dismissed. 2. As far as postman is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioner is not pressing for summoning him. Insofar as the son of the landlady is concerned, he submits that demand draft and legal notice have been sent to the address of the son of landlady. Her son received notice and the demand draft in the month of June, 2008. Therefore, son of the landlady is proper person to unfold the case of the petitioner and hence, he prays to issue summons to the son of the landlady. 3. Rent Control case was filed for eviction of the respondent on the ground of willful default in payment of rent from March, 2008 to July, 2008. The acknowledgment said to have been signed by the son of the landlady has not been denied by her. Under Section 10 of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960, if the tenant fails to pay the rent even for one month within 15 days if there is an agreement or at the end of that month, if there is no agreement, then he is liable for eviction. Therefore, the presence of the son of the landlady is not necessary for deciding the issue. The trial Court rightly dismissed the application and the said order needs no interference by this Court. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. --------------------- K.C.BHANU, J DATED: 17-02-2011 Hsd