M! HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.2509 OF 2010 PETITIONER Bhanu Pratap Singh Versus State éf Chhattisgarh & Another (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. RESPONDENTS Present :- Shri S.P. Kale, Advocate for the petitioner. Ni; Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 19‘” day of January, 201 1) r 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was working as. Assistant Fitter, which is a class-iV post, and he was retired from his service on attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 60 years when the retirement ageof class-iv employees under the provisions of Chhattisgarh Shashkiya Sevak (Adhi-Varshiki Ayu), Adhiniyam, 1967, is 62 years. The petitioner has not produced any documents to establish that he is a class-IV ' employee except the self-same statement. 2. On the other hand, Shri Sridhar, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State, has come out categorically that the petitioner was a Class-Ill employee and, as such, under the provisions of law, the age of retirement is 60 years. Shri Sridhar, relying on the circular dated 11/08/008 wherein the set ‘up of work charged and contingency establishment has been shown. The Assistant Fitter has been shown at serial No.15 as a class-Ill post. The petitioner .- has rightly been retired from his service. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed. '““’ ‘ Sdl— sATISH K- AGN‘H: {K Judge Arun , V/P/