IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 22ND KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 32495 of 2009(F) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- ARAVIND.S, ARAVINDAM, PALA P.O. BY ADVS. SMT.AYSHA YOUSEFF SMT.MOLLY JACOB SMT.U.M.FOUSIA SMT.RABIA BEEGAM T.K. MR.JOBI.A.THAMPI SMT.M.KABANI DINESH SMT.BOBY M.SEKHAR SMT.FASHIYA YOUSEFF RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------------- 1. CALICUT UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENJIPALAM, CALICUT. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENJIPALAM, CALICUT. 3. PRINCIPAL, VISHNU AYURVEDA COLLEGE, SHORNUR. BY MR. P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss P.N.RAVINDRAN,J. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 32495 of 2009 - F ---------------------------------------- Dated 13th November, 2009 Judgment The petitioner appeared for the third Professional BAMS Degree Examination conducted by the University of Calicut in May, 2009. The results were published on 9.10.2009. The petitioner failed in one paper. He has therefore applied for revaluation of his answer script in the said paper along with other papers in which he had secured pass marks. The petitioner submits that he had done well in the examination and that if his answer scripts in Salyatantram Paper I and II are revalued, he is sure to secure a pass. He submits that as he has completed his course of study, unless his answer script is expeditiously revalued, he will be put to serious prejudice. On these grounds, he seeks expeditious revaluation of his answer scripts. 2. Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, the learned standing counsel for the University of Calicut submits that if Ext.P3 application is in order and the requisite fee has been paid, the University will W.P.(C) No.32495/2009 2 take expeditious steps to have the petitioner's answer scripts in the concerned subjects revalued and to communicate the results to him expeditiously. He submits that since ten answer scripts of the petitioner have to be revalued, the University should be given a reasonable time to complete the revaluation and to communicate the results. In the light of the said submission, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to take expeditious steps to have the the petitioner's answer scripts described in Ext.P3 application revalued and to communicate the result to him expeditiously and in any event, within eight weeks from the date on which the petitioner produces a certified copy of this judgment before the Controller of Examinations, University of Calicut. P.N.RAVINDRAN Judge vaa