IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12593 of 2010 1. AMRESH NANDAN,son of Jay Chandra Sharma, 2. Rajesh Kumar Sharma,son of Jay Chandra Sharma, 3. Gunjan Kumar Sharma,son of Amresh nandan All residents of village- Hajipur,P.S.-Kundva Chainpur,District-East Champaran at Motihari. .. .. Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR.. .. Opp.Party ----------- For the Petitioners :Dr.Amrendra Kumar,Advocate For the State :Mr.Md.Nazir Ansari,Addl.P.P. ---------- 02/ 11-05-2010 Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution for the offences under Sections 406, 420 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, the accused persons including the petitioners are alleged to have cheated Rs.1,28,000/- from the informant on the allurement of installation of Aircel Tower and for providing him job. Petitioners are family members of co-accused Satyam Kumar @ Kundan. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that even, according to the prosecution case, main allegation is against co-accused Satyam Kumar @ Kundan, who alone is said to have received the entire amount of Rs.1,28,000/-. The petitioners being family members of the aforesaid co-accused Satyam Kumar @ Kundan have been roped in the present case. It is further highlighted that co-accused Satyam Kumar @ Kundan has already been granted bail by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 2 Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer made on behalf of the petitioners on the ground that they are accused in at least two more cases of similar nature, therefore, possibility cannot be ruled out that these petitioners in collusion with co-accused Satyam Kumar @ Kundan might have cheated some other persons. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the petitioners are accused in two more cases of similar nature, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. The petitioners must surrender in the court below in connection with Majorganj P.S.Case No.120 of 2009 within a period of four weeks from today and seek regular bail, if so advised. If such a petition is filed, the same shall be considered and disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order and also by taking into consideration other materials, which are available on record. AH/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)