WP(C) 3545/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI Heard Mr. AM Mazumdar, learned Senior counsel, assisted by Mr. DA Kaiyam , learned counsel, for the petitioners, and Mr. P Roy, learned Senior Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the respondents. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the m aterials on record, I am, as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, i nclined to dispose of the writ petition at this stage itself with the following observations and directions: The petitioners herein, who are elected representatives of Goroimari Anchalik Pa nchayat and of some other Gaon Panchayats, which fall under Goroimary Developmen t Block. in the district of Kamrup, have alleged that the selection of beneficia ries, for the purpose of giving them financial assistance under the Indira Awaas Yojana (IAY), has not been made in accordance with law inasmuch as the select l ist, which the State respondents, now, seek to act upon, is a list, which has be en prepared not by a Gram Sabha as is required under the said scheme. The petiti oner also contend that there is already a waiting list and the beneficiaries, na med in the waiting list, ought to have been extended the financial assistance be fore preparing a new select list. Considering the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justice, i t is hereby directed that the respondents, particularly, respondent No. 2, namel y, Director of Panchayat & Rural Development Department, Assam, shall examine th e grievances of the writ petitioners and pass appropriate order(s) in accordance with law. The whole exercise, so directed, shall be completed by the respondent s within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this orde r by the respondent No. 2. The petitioners may furnish to the respondent No. 2, a certified copy of this order along with copies of the writ petition and annexu res thereto. Whatever decision is reached by the respondents/authorities concern ed, the same shall be communicated, in writing, to the petitioners. If the petit ioners feel aggrieved by the decision(s), which may be reached by the respondent s/authorities, the petitioners shall be at liberty to take recourse to such prov isions of law as may be permissible.