IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) No. wm /2010 ETITIONER /: Kavid e’ Rai, S/o. Late Ramdahal Rai ged about 30 years, R/o. Mayapur Ambikapur District Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS ESPONDENTS 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through Depamnent of Home (Police) D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G. 2] irector General Of Police Head Quarter Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3] Inspector General Of Police, Surguja Range Surguja District Surguja (C.G.) 4] Superintendent Of Police Balrampur District Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA P R ) D 3a W, WW, Wm LNG/M mm (Wu) Wmm SB: Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mc 23.8.2010 Shri Vikram Dixit, couns< Shri Ajit Singh, Panel J advance copy. Heard on admission. Learned counsel f0r m zoo WWW asmnéwm departmental enquiry agains the petitioner 31.8.2009 (Annexure P-6), penalty of withholding one increment was imposed on the petitioner. Lat lhan Shrivastava J. :1 for the petitioner. Jawyer for the State/respondents, on submits t the petitioner, that in a vide order dated er on, order was revised in exercise of suo motu power by the Inspector General of Police and thereafter, “an order was passed on 12.112 dismissal from service was im petitioner preferred a departm remained pending without any elapsed. etitioner submits that the respondents Learned counsel for the may be directed to consider the appeal. Taking into considerati n the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and e fact that he appeal has already been preferred, which is pending consideration, this petition is finally disposed off with direction th t the appeal of the petitioner may be decided, expeditiously. > ‘\‘ l Manindra Mohan Shrivastayg, Judge Sd/- WWdWW #‘WW 309 (Annexure P—8) and a penalty of osed. Aggrieved by the said order, the ,ntal appeal. However, that appeal has decision though more than 6 months