IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 25th day of August, 2009 Bail Application No. 761 of 2009 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Pinku S/o Mangeram R/o Village Rawli Mehdood P.S. Ranipur, District Haridwar. ………… Applicant Versus tate of Uttarakhand ………… Opposite Party S Arising out of Crime No. 92 of 2009 Under Sections: 380, 411 of I.P.C. Police Station: Kotwali Ranipur District: Haridwar. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Shashi Kant Shandilya, Advocate present for the applicant. Mr. Amit Bhatt, A.G.A. present for the respondent State. Applicant Pinku, who is in jail in connection with Crime No. 92 of 2009, relating to offences punishable under Section 380, 411 of I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Ranipur, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that co-accused Raja @ Irfan, with similar role, has already been directed to be released on bail by this Court vide its order dated 12th of June 2009, passed on bail application No. 419 of 2009. On the last date this Court desired to know if there is any criminal history of the applicant. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State in which it has been made clear that the applicant has no criminal history. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail. Let the applicant Pinku be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. (Urgency Application No. 2088 of 2009 stands disposed of). [ (Prafulla.C. Pant, J.) Dt. 25.08.2009 H.Negi 2