$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 16258/2006 SAMBHAVANA ..... Petitioner Through : Ms S.N.Pal, Advocate. versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr S.S.Ahluwalia, Advocate for R-19, 25, 43, 44, 61, 63, 64, 75 & 76. Mr R.P.Sharma, Advocate for R-31. Mr Navin Chawla, Advocate for R-39. Mr Vivek Goyal, Advocate for Union of India. Mr Saurabh Banerjee, Advocate for Delhi University. Mr Naushad Ahmed Khan, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr Rajesh Gogna, Advocate for R-29. Mr Rajiv Bansal, Advocate for R-53/IPH. Mr Vinayak Mehrotra, Advocate for R-85. Ms Beenashaw N.Soni, Advocate for R-3, 11, 22, 30 & 54. Mr M.K.Singh, Advocate for R-23 & 81. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 17.03.2016 W.P.(C) 16258/2006 & CM No.11400/2012(directions) The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks some more time to file the rejoinder-affidavit. He may do so within six weeks. Renotify on 14.07.2016. BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J MARCH 17, 2016 ‘sn’