IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.34425 of 2009 JATTU YADAV, S/O LATE TRIVENI YADAV, R/O VILL. – PIRWA, P.S. MADANPUR, DISTT. – AURANGABAD (BIHAR) ………………………………………………….…. PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ………..……….. OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner:- Mr. Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr. Advocate. For the State:- Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P. ---------- 5. 18.12.2009. Perused the report of the trial court. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 307 I.P.C. and Sections 25(1-B), 26, 27 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A.Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is named in the first information report as an activist of M.C.C. and allegedly there has been firing and counter-firing but there is no injury upon anybody. It is submitted that co-accused Nepali Yadav, who is also named in the first information report and had been assigned the role of Area Commander, has been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 22.12.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 46508/2008. It has 2 also been submitted that co-accused Ram Pravesh Paswan @ Pravesh Paswan and Dwarika Yadav @ Bidhayak Jee @ Bidhayak @ Bidhayak Yadav have also been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 25.04.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 11171/2008 analogous with Cr. Misc. No. 5661/2008. It is next submitted that petitioner has been made accused in Salaiya P.S. Case No. 13/03, but he has been granted bail in that case by a bench of this Court vide order dated 20.11.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 41529/2009. Petitioner is stated to be in custody since 16.12.2006. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the petitioner, namely, Jattu Yadav to be released on bail on his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge II, Aurangabad (Bihar) in connection with S. Tr. No. 527/09, arising out of Salaiya P.S. Case No. 27/03, G.R. No. 1818/03, subject to the condition that one of the bailors must be either the family member or close relative of the petitioner, who shall swear an affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy 3 showing his relationship with the petitioner. It is also made clear that if the petitioner, after his release in this case, again involves himself in a criminal case of similar nature, it would be open for the concerned court to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )