CRM No.M-3783 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-3783 of 2011 Date of decision:21.05.2012 Raj Kumar and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr.M.S.Chahal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Charanjit Singh Bakshi, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr.Ajay Vijororia, Advocate, for the complainant. RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Quashing of FIR No.263 dated 31.8.2009 registered under Sections 147, 148, 323, 342 and 452 of IPC at Police Station, Tosham, District Bhiwani and the proceedings consequential thereto are being sought on the basis of compromise dated 8.1.2012 (Annexure P-2). As per the allegations in the FIR, on 30.8.2009 at about 8 p.m., the accused/petitioners entered the house of his brother Jaivir and caused injuries to him, his brother Jaivir and Ram Kumar. The motive behind the occurrence is that they wanted to remove the coat lying in front of the house of Jaibir. In this background, the impugned FIR was registered. Initially, the FIR was registered on the statement of respondent No.3 against the petitioners and further a cross-case was CRM No.M-3783 of 2011 2 made by the police against the private respondents. Two separate reports under Section 173 of Cr. P.C. were submitted by the police in cross-case. Three trials are pending for adjudication which arose from the said FIR, namely, State versus Suresh etc., State vs. Rajkumar which are triable by Additional Sessions Judge, Bhiwani jointly and one trial State vs. Sukhbir etc. which is triable by Juvenile Justice Board, Bhiwani. Now, the parties have entered into a compromise, which is evident from Annexure P-2. In compliance of order dated 9.2.2012, status report has been received from the Additional District and Sessions Judge-III, Bhiwani. As per the status report in case titled as `State vs. Ram Kumar and others' the joint statements of Raj Kumar, Krishan and Mahender, who are injured, has been recorded, wherein they had settled the matter with Suresh and others with the intervention. As per the status report in Raj Kumar & others vs. State of Haryana and others, joint statement of Ram Kumar, Jaibir and Balwan, who are injured, has been recorded, admitting the factum of compromise with Ram Kumar and others. Counsel for the State does not controvert the said facts. After going through the status report, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served in prolonging the litigation as the dispute between the parties has been settled. Consequently, in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab (supra) and the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court CRM No.M-3783 of 2011 3 in the case of Kulwinder Singh and Ors. vs. State of Punjab and another (supra), FIR No.263 dated 31.8.2009 registered under Sections 147, 148, 323, 342 and 452 of IPC registered at Police Station, Tosham, District Bhiwani and the proceedings consequential thereto are quashed qua the petitioners. The petition stands disposed of. 21.05.2012 (RITU BAHRI) mks JUDGE