IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal I Bail Application No.549 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Sudhir Kumar Agarwal S/o Late Radhe Shyam Agarwal S.C. 200 Shastri Nagar, Ghaziabad, UP ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party Arising out of FIR No.100 of 2010 (Crl. Case No.1880/2010), U/s 498-A/494, 495, 420, 504, 323, 506 IPC & 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, PS Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar Dated: June 2, 2010 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, Brief Holder for the State as well as Mr. JS Virk & Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocates for the complainant. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the co-accused Mayank Agarwal, husband of the complainant, has been granted bail by this Court on 2.4.2010 and the present applicant, being the father in law of the complainant and having his case on the better footing, also deserves bail on the basis of parity. After considering all the facts and circumstances, perusing the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Sudhir Kumar Agarwal be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Udham Singh Nagar. Bail application is allowed accordingly. 2.06.2010 Rajeev Dang (Dharam Veer, J.)