^t5<3^ (BesiisaSsS'N ^^^s^-^^ PETITIONER IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WTIT PETITION NC^ ^^7 2003 :1. ^^^ ^.?<'^aP Pranab Bhattachaiya, Aged about 32 years, S/o.ShrfP.K.Bhattacharya Dhauratikra, Baikunthpur, ./ / Korea, Chhattisgarh •I'^-^ff-sP'' ^^^'., i.--' €^. r^A' ^^^€^ ^- ^^- ffi*T3wi6sa; :2. / Birendra Kumar Tiwari, Aged about 33 years S/o. Shri Nagendra Nath Tiwari, Post Office Patna, Tahsil Baikunthpur, , District Korea, C.G. :3./ Ramkripal Sahu, Aged bout 33 years -^ S/o. Shri Manohar Rara Sahu, Village Badgaon, P.0. Patrapali, Tah. Baikunthpur, Distt. Korea, C.G. :4. /' Satish Divedi, Aged about 30 years S/o. Shri O.P.Divedi, Manendragarh, District Korea, Chhattisgarh :5. Pankaj Pandey, Aged about 28 years S/o. Shri Ramchandra Pandey, Baikunthpur, District Korea, C.G. RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through its Secretary, General Administration Department, DKS Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The CoUector, Baikunthpur, District Korea, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 85 227_OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-BEi-22 311^51 q? h-A'h 3H|SI St)+()<ft ^ff< •\ <;'"'• -^- € .3^? •illfflpt'il, »<il"H<is, RtcHay ^r^t 'qg'g? .,y-^^>W3. at««'iia»1(H<»> 2003 jd*<iiy" spn^T ^4^1% ^fici /., Shri Shailendra Shukla," Shri Ranbir Singh, ©ovt.^ State/resporiden+s. Hedpd. Th® petitjbners have ph 2.2ai227 w the Cofistitution ofl ; In pam-5 o'f the petition gcpointed in Censys Departmen-t counse Lspecifi.ied duration vide Anne mentidned that after corripletii o^pointed in diffenent , posttngand eqipoinTtflenT orders h Learned' counsei for th petitioners 2,* 3 and 4 namely, gi und Satish Divedi, spectively,.? Census Departmen'f|on 06.Q5.20G ncmely, Pranav BNattacharya d appointed on daily wages by Cen 31.05.200t. ^Ther'eafter, 1+ieq wcges by the| bisljrict Returnin ideritity cardsl forl vofers .vide WlfEPfrt BPOT^^'f^t <l<lt(it ^rsi^IHSll^r il forthe petjtioners. <» • . . .. . • . • ' Elvocate takes notice on bshalf of the ;ferred this petition under Artiele ••idia.- . tisslated thatj the petitioners were as Assistant ^rade-III on coritract xure P-1. In tiiat Dara it has been |n of Ifte Cehsus work they were Petiti6ner-wis% details of -rtieir |ive heen onnexed as Ahnexure P-2. 6 petitioners subinit+ed t(ia1'i ttie rendra Kumar Tiwarii Rgmkripal S&hu uere ^ippointed on daily vwges by;-tiiel Dupto31.05.2Q01. PetitiQners 1 S 5 Pcnkcy Pandey respectively/.were; sus Ctepdtrtment on ®.07.2QQO|U^ ^etitioneps were appoin'ted on. t- Offic»r for prepdration ef |p|ib|o :Brder .dated ll.t2.20Q2..3l-go»-<iea t6 ^::;21^.! 4;"!Ti;:?i ^:' .-3-rx & ^i^ XI-BB-225 si^tgCT K'lisXi&n St**)t<t> ttl^fl ;! il 's^-'ltOii?!'); »-alwKB, Rwii'sy sfl^r TRR? _..M^^.&.^ *ii«n'iiiti*ii<* MltS fts^' siiSaTOiw^iftoi S-+ furtHer petjt part|7ient the notiflctt-1-fon counsel for'riie petitioner's be direc1%d to peguiarfze the there is on order of fhe clepar'^T' trecrted as surplus jwprkers and other depar'Tment a$ per As has been i mentioned in orders the petitioners were term and on expiF^lof That term[ terminatecl. ; i The Hon'bie ^pex Court in| Nadu & ahother v». ©.Mobomejy AIR 1999 SC 22ej2 issued work out a scheriie to absortf employments. |It would, be out a scheme: to absorb these Let sueh ctScheme Ibe worked occasionully anse. } On eaplier i. '.'..'. '•...: ••• '.'; arisen, those^ who |had done si Government sepvice |}y the 6byer'| may also beair in mirid whether th^ locat auttioril'ies, quasi^s companies. j : lovernrnelnta 'tiWii'Kil') ffl*raf^ f^ft tRj^R %<MFd<t311^ [er submitted that respondents may jtioners. He furthep submitted ttiat that these employsss may be ^ioyld have been giv^n prior-ity over issued by -t+ie StaTe. „ [the petition itself vide appointment jintea on contract basis for d fixed ,the petitjoner's sepytes have been the case of Sovemment of TamJ! Atheenuddin & others reDortedin is ttiat the Sovernment shouid ^ 1+iese employees, in ^appropt'iate! for the ©overnmentto work ipioyees in cippropricite employment. as we think tha+'such a'situcEl-tere kaisions when sucH sityati»n had ^iMap jobs, had been absorbed ;il'i jiment. Indoing so,the Soverrfnient employees.CGm be i-ecruited in jthfe il organizations or goyernTnent dire^tion apprc^rin+e erh oUt 3i:IS:i IIKI ^SSs SSSK £i^^" W3K '^^•^"^; TSS ^'siSsS '^:1;1^1^1 iiir E.HII XI-HR-22 SII^ff^T l^'hlfe'Nt^i St>*-n^^RRT < Subbu 'g^'<<i<ii<t<(, ®nl*f'ie,l*K»tKi(y ^sus :^^..^^.&^^.^ '.^^ ;Nl^fe«l>tH'Ebf''^"^i''""^'"—''^~'Wt,200_§. sSat <)fl^^?^sa< tffell In view of fhe above clir^ctions given by the 1-lon'ble Apex Court," tiie ©ovepnment of Ci^hattisgar'h , may ^aiso; teonsider for- absorbing the surpllus^employess Departmerit in the? light of the Court'arid theipetifioners are Bf who had worked undsr the Csnsus pirection gwen by the l-ion1iie Apex I'liberty To flpprodch ^the ©owrhment for absorption and;on their moyijig -ttie ©oyemmentof Chhattisgarh, Departmeht of 'Senenii Ad]{'iinistration may consider their "epresentationsqipropriately. With thesao|)Servations th^ writ petition stands disposed of. Parties are entitled for cer <*l<ii<'f4t'l tiiHi-B ^ ft^fWregR ^diFiwaiiSH '^^^^ liiillllB :.:ffil33BS : tillBli iifflllKi iiiwa ffid![;iS 1111 Bli! 'j'-^s^l^ ifisd copy of. thls order. Sd/- , L.C.BHADOO Judge' M w ttS m