IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-11847 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.05.2011 Balraj and others ....Petitioners Versus Rupender and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Mohit Jaggi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No1. Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, Addl. A.G., Punjab. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in complaint case No.36/2010 under Sections 148/149/323/324/325/326/506 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that petitioners have surrendered/appeared before the trial Court and have been enlarged on bail by the learned trial Court in compliance of order dated 21.4.2011. He further states that petitioners shall keep on appearing before the trial Court on each and every date fixed. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, petition is allowed. Order dated 21.4.2011 is made absolute. (Alok Singh) Judge May 19, 2011 R.S.