IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 7TH JANUARY 2011 / 17TH POUSHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 8559 of 2010() ---------------------------------------- CMP.8832/2010 of J.M.F.C.-I, CHENGANNUR CRIME NO.1108/2010 OF CHENGANNUR POLICE STATION, ALAPUZHA DISTRICT .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED-A1 ----------------------------------------- SURESH KUMAR,AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.SUKUMARAN,KARIYILKIZHAKETHIL VEEDU, KUTTEMPERUR MURI,MANNAR VILLAGE, ALAPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.AJITH MURALI RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts V. RAMKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.8559 of 2010 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of January, 2011 ORDER The petitioner, who is accused No.1 in Crime No.1108 of 2010 of Chengannur Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 324, 308 & 427 read with Section 149 I.P.C., seeks his enlargement on bail. The petitioner was arrested on 06/12/2010. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application contending inter alia that the two injured persons were attacked with sword stick and the petitioner is involved in twenty five other crimes besides his involvement in a KAPPA case. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioner, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of B.A.No.8559/2010 2 the case, I am of the view that if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj