WRW PETiTiON UNDER ARTJCLES 228 OF THE CONSTiTUTiON OF iNDiA M SB: Hon’bie Sm’i Satish K. Aanihctri J. Present: Shri Saurabh Jain: Advocate fer the petitioner, Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State CREER (GRAD (Passed on 17‘“ day of December, 2089) 1. Learned counse} appearing for the petitioners; on instructions; submits that the petitioners do not want to contest the petition on merits, however, the peiitioners may be granted ii’oerty to make a representation in iight of the judgment and order dated iii“ September, 2U06 passed in WP.(S) No. 1588/2005 (Mun? Prasad Kasai/3,0 and others V. State ofMP. & Orherei (Annexure P/Z) read with oirouiar oated 09362068 (Armexure P/S) for corieideratioh before the concerned authorities ’ it is ordered. Acoordingiy, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above Stated iiberty; i‘i so advised. Sd/- Satish ’K. Agnihotri Judge Amit LWWW HieH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA$PUR wmT PETmON (S) No. 7411 of200§ PETwmNER ¥ : Satish Chandra Hardiha. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of ‘