IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 28TH JUNE 2010 / 7TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 37245 of 2009(A) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- VANAJA.K.P, W/O. RAVEENDRAN.V.V., ORIE, KAITHAKAD (P.O), CHERUVATHUR VIA., KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.P.K.PRIYA. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KASARAGOD. 2. THE THRIKARIPUR FARMERS SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, P.O. THRIKARIPUR, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, REP. BY THE SECRETARY. 3. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, THE THRIKARIPUR FARMERS SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. R2 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.VIJAYAMOHANAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/06/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.37245/2009-A: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE APPROVED STAFF STRENGTH. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE RANKED LIST OF PEON. EXT.P.3; COPY OF THE RANKED LIST OF SALES PERSONS PUBLISHED BY THE R.2. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE RANKED LIST OF JUNIOR CLERK. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), HOSDURG DTD. 17/12/2009. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION BEFORE R.1. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO.37245 OF 2009 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is the person who has been ranked as No. 3 in Ext.P3 rank list. The selection for appointment to the post of Junior Clerk was conducted by the second respondent Bank through the Co- operative Service Examination Board. After the rank list was published, two persons have already been appointed. According to the petitioner, there are two other vacancies in the Bank, which have arisen after the rank list was published. It is submitted that Ext.P3 rank list is in force and that its validity would expire only on 26.8.2010. According to the petitioner, she is the next in the rank list to be appointed. She complains that if no appointments are made by the Bank, serious prejudice would be caused to her since the list is about to expire. 2. The counsel for the petitioner submits that Ext.P6 representation has been submitted to the first respondent setting out her grievances in detail. However, no orders have been passed on Wpc 37245/2009 2 Ext.P6, till date. Adv.P.K.Vijayamohanan, who appears for the second respondent Bank has no objection to a direction being issued to first respondent to consider Ext.P6. 3. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the grievance of the petitioner set out in her representation evidenced herein by Ext.P6 in accordance with law, and to pass appropriate orders thereon as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within a period of one month from today. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE lgk