IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23966 of 2008 SANTOSH SAH @ SANTOSH KUMAR SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 3.7.2008. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the shop in question from which sample of Barfi was seized for examination of its contents do not belong to the petitioner and he is not the registered owner, Manoj Kumar Sah, the brother of the petitioner is the registered shop owner, It has also been submitted that no offence under Section 16(a) (1) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act is made out as the report itself is not proper. Considering the aforesaid fact prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. The petitioner namely Santosh Sah is directed to surrender before the S.D.J.M.Supaul within four weeks from today and on his so surrendering he shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M. Supaul in connection with P.F.A case no.4 of 2007 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Sss/- (Mridula Mishra, J)