IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2010 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 10105 of 2010(K) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- C.SIMON, ROLLER DRIVER, P.W.D.ROADS SECTION, MINI CIVIL STATION, CHENGANNUR. BY ADVS. MR.R.T.PRADEEP MR.V.VIJULAL RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- THE CHIEF ENGINEER (ADMINISTRATION) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER (ADMINISTRATION) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.ANTONY MUKKATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P. (C) No. 10105 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 25th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a Roller Driver in Public Works Department. He is presently working at Chengannur. He has earlier approached this court by filing WPC No.23777/2009 challenging his transfer from Roads Section, Venjaramood to the Roads Section, Chengannoor with an alternative prayer to consider the representation filed by him carrying a request for out of turn transfer on compassionate grounds. As per Ext.P6 judgment, the said writ petition was disposed of with a direction to consider the request made by the petitioner in Exts. P4 and P5 representations. Though the said representations were consequently considered his request was rejected on the ground that the vacancy pointed out by him was abolished. Thereafter, he has submitted an application for considering his request during the general transfer as per Ext.P8. 2. The petitioner limited the prayer and seeks only for a direction to the respondents to consider the grievances raised WPC.10105 of 2010 : 2 : as per Ext.P8 before preparing the lists of employees for effecting general transfer. This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider request of the petitioner raised as per Ext.P8 in case the provisional transfer list has not been finalized. In case it is finalized, the second respondent shall consider whether the petitioner could be granted a convenient posting without disturbing the finalized list. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma