1 CR.APL NO.2439/2010 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 914. CRI.APPLN/2439/2010 REKHA SHIVAJI DOIPHODE V/S THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND ANR In REVNST/170/2010 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.S.Londhe, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. V.H.Dighe, APP for State. Mr. D.S.Manorkar, Adv., for R.No.2. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 27.1.2011 1. Heard. On wrong advice, the applicant preferred proceedings in terms of Section 378 of Cr.P.C., challenging acquittal in SCC No. 619/2008 before the learned Sessions Judge. Her appeal is rejected as not maintainable by order dt. 23.3.2010. In all this affair, there is delay of 129 days. The delay is not deliberate, sufficiently explained. It was only based on erroneous assumption of right to challenge, in terms of Section 378 of Cr.P.C., which was invoked before the Additional 2 CR.APL NO.2439/2010 Sessions Judge. Since the delay is properly explained, it is condoned. Application allowed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/2439-10crapl