1 mmj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN ITS CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3369 OF 2009 Santosh A Maurya & Anr. ..Petitioners Vs. CIDCO & Ors. ..Respondents Shri H.E.Pawle for the Petitioner Shri A.M.Kulkarni for the Respondent No.1 Smt S.S.Bhende AGP for Respondent State Coram: P.B.MAJMUDAR AND R.M. SAVANT, JJ. 22nd June, 2010 P.C. 1. The Petitioners by this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks to challenge the letter dated 27th February 2004 issued by the Respondent No.1 by which letter, allotment of plots made in favour of the Petitioners came to be cancelled. 2. The said cancellation is on account of the fact that the Petitioners have not complied with the 2 terms and conditions of the allotment in as much as the Petitioners have failed to pay the amounts as required to be paid under the said allotment letter. 3. It would be pertinent to note that, the Petitioners seek to challenge the letter dated 27th February 2004 by filing the above Writ Petition which has been filed on 22nd July 2008. In our view, apart from the fact that in so far as cancellation of allotment is concerned, the same would fall within the realm of contract between the two parties as the above writ petition is not maintainable. The challenge, therefore, in the above Petition is also grossly belated. Hence, in our view, on the aforesaid two grounds, the Petition is required to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed. (R.M.SAVANT, J.) (P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)