FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CA/859/2010 EX. ENGR. V/S SUBHASH WITH CA/860/2010, CA/857/2010, CA/858/2010, CA/855/2010, CA/856/2010, CA/853/2010, CA/854/2010, CA/861/2010 & CA/862/2010 ... 1. Present Civil Applications are filed for condonation of delay. 2. The applicant has filed First Appeals against the award passed by the Reference Court. The applicant is an acquiring body. 2. Shri Pawar, learned Advocate for respondents vehemently opposes the application for condonation of delay on the ground that no sufficient cause has been made out. 3. It is settled law that the application for condonation of delay has to be liberally construed. The applicant has given reasons due to which the delay has occurred in filing the First Appeals. 4. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned. The applications are allowed. No order as to costs. Dt.11.3.2011 (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.) akl