F [-HG—78 3Tl^T ^T'f^fN? '<CT3?TT^T sb^Jcb (^ ^SE( ^|A||d'4, 8>tH'y<i<o, [®i<ni'M*i< *11*1CTI g,^jq, ~ ^ ^n^r TT?W (y<I^<si<^r) ^TTW^T^TT 3^T^[ PETITIQNER RESPONDENTS Dev about | vmag^ Raipuj| 1. B.K.S.I ^iagh GM^(<rt41i *iM<riT^ fs^ <rai<^i< ifr^tRTH^TT^T Netam, S/o Ghasiya Netani aged 24 years, Student Class 10th, R/o Barbaspur, Block- Bodla, Distdct- (G) Versus Rey, Chairmao., Chhatdsgarh Madh^iymik ShikshaMaadal, Raipur (CG) C-1, Paiich^heel Nagar, Raipur (CG) 2. D.K. j Paiidey, Assistaat vSecretary, Chhat|dsgarh Madhayraik Shiksha Maiidal, Raipu^ (CG) C-l, Paachsheel Nagar, Raipui' (CG) Petition U/s 12 ofthe Contlempt ofCourtsAct&^U/A215pfthe CoiastRtutioaa of Iiadia S.B. HON'BLE SHRI DHIRENORA MISHR&. J. 17.03.2009 Shri F. S. Khare, counse^ for fhe petitioner. Heard, The petitioner was reguj High School, Rengalcliai' (Kala] exainuiation forai was duly fcj Chhattisgai'h Madhyamjk Shi) form was rejected by fhe Mac^ lar student of Class 10th of Goveniment |, Block- Bodla, Distdct- Kabirdham, His ^warded by fhe concemed school .to the ^sha Maiidal. However, his examination [hyaaiik Shiksha Maadal on the grouud iT XI-HG—78 ^^r T^i^icn<<8, ^tiiwKo, T®Kni^i< WRC'IT <»»^icb :W[;200 3TI^FT 'q^^ (^lf^^) 3TT^T ^T'f^fN? ^^ <ffT^?T sn^iqi p^ ^TTW^f^^T^T ~2 that there was a gap ia pursiii-a^ satisfactorily explained, The petitioner filed Writ disposed of by fhis Court on submission of flie counsel of petitioner subraits gap certi&cat^ appropriate orders wiU be passe| order was passed even after certifieate, the petitioner fUed y^ whichwas disposed ofon the as^ Shiksha Maiidal fhat earUer ordi shall be passed ui accordaiice wif The Chhattisgarh Madhai Annexure A-8 dated 6.2.2009 u] High Secondaiy Schoql, Renga enclosed with. fhe appUcation, it ia appearuig exaaiuiation of Clai petitbner caniiot be pennitted to the petitioner shall be eUgible t6 correspondence coiirse. Froia perusal of flie abov< that fhe respondents ia eonipliai <=hNl<n<ili *iH<!if ^f fs^l <P»I^K ^arRFrsiT^r fhe stiidies and which has not been petition (C) No.304/09, which was 19th Jaiiuary 2009 on ftie basis of Ma|dhyamik Shiksha Maiidal that if the |, fhe same shatl be considered aiid |l, ia accordaaee with law. When no fhe petitioner subniitted his gap (t anotlier Writ Petition (C) 769/09, ^iraace of counsel for fhe Madhyamik ^r sliaU be coiapHed wifli aad order [i law, wifliia a penod ofone week, .a4iik Shlksha Mandal vicle order of u^formed fhe Prmcipal of Govemnient [char fliat froisi fhe gap certificate |s clear fhat fhere is a gap of 3 years >s-10th aiid iu view of the same, the [appear as regular student, However, appear ui tlie exainiaation through order, this Court is of tiie opmion ce offhe order passed by fhis Court i.f- T ^) ^.'^ 's^r ^i<<i<n^, ©Tily'Kc,f®)di-M^< •n*ifir^<-i?^» '^200 ^TI^T TI^F (^I^^?) 3n^^>R^i<sh <W 3TI^?T s?i*iicn ^..:- ^^<nW ^rft<T ^i^ '-^- have considered fhe gnevance of eUgible to appear io. fhe Class-10tl't Thus, fhe order passed by witli and there is no ground to uj fhe respondents, The petition admission stage itsetf. ttie If the petitioner is aggrievedj 6.2.2009 passed by fhe Chhattisg| may file appropnate proceediags by the order of Annexure A-8 dated >g^rh Madhyamik Shiksha Maadal, he afeaiast fhe above order. In view of the above order, I ^t<<I<n<ilwi *^M<A ^f 'fe^ <f^t^R ^^TfiW^T^T petitioner aad held fhat he is not examination as regular student, fhis Court has been duly conipUed dtiate conteinpt proceedio.gs agamst is accordmgly dismissed at the ^, No, 1 also staads disposed of Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge 4-.