IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.9643 of 2008. Decided on: 30.12.2010. Dr. Kuldeep Acharya. ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood,Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate, Geneeral with Mr. R.P. Singh,Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that in view of the reply filed, he does not press this petition. 2. Consequently, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 30, 2010. (krt) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.