LPA No. 915 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No. 915 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision 4 .8.2010 Union of India and others ... Appellants Versus Tej Kaur... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: Ms. Renu Bala Sharma ,Advocate for the appellant 1.To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 2.Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? M.M.KUMAR, J. The Union of India has preferred this appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent challenging judgement dated 12.12.2009 rendered by the learned Single Judge. It has been held that Smt. Tej Kaur a widow of army personnel was entitled to the grant of ordinary family pension as provided under para 219 of the Pension Regulations for the Army. It has come on record that Tej Kaur remarried the younger brought of her deceased husband and as per Regulation 219 she would be entitled to family pension. While allowing the writ petition, the learned Single Judge has placed reliance on various judgements including the one rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court, this Court and Delhi High Court. On our asking for any distinguishing feature between the judgements relied upon by the learned Single Judge and the facts of the present case, learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to show us any such component or feature which may impel us to take a view different than the one taken by the LPA No. 915 of 2010 2 learned Single Judge. The appeal is wholly without merit and is thus liable to be dismissed. For the reasons recorded above, this appeal fails and the same is dismissed. (M.M.Kumar) Judge (A. N. Jindal ) 4 .8.2010 Judge okg