1 S.B.Civil Second Appeal No.91/2006. Fateh Khatun vs. Aamdeen and others. Date : 13.4.2007 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. BK Mehar, for the appellant. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the appellant. The plaintiff/appellant filed the suit for cancellation of sale deed dated 4.10.1963 by filing the suit on 25.4.1998. The alleged sale deed was executed by none-else than the father of the plaintiff/ appellant in favour of Aamdeen. It is submitted that the father of the plaintiff died after three years of execution of sale deed. It is also not in dispute that the other legal heirs of Meghe Khan, (plaintiff's father), the vendor, purchased certain part of the same property from Aamdeen. The plaintiff's contention is that she was not aware of the sale deed dated 4.10.1963 nor her father 2 was aware about the sale deed. In fact, he did not execute the said sale deed. Two courts below concurrently decided all the issues against the plaintiff and also held that the plaintiff is seeking relief of cancellation of sale deed dated 4.3.1963 by filing suit on 25.4.1998 and that too, when the other legal heirs of Meghe Khan (Plaintiff's father) had purchased part of same property from Aamdeen. It is also admitted case that the plaintiff is married daughter. In view of the above, the courts below have not committed any illegality so as to warrant interference in second appeal. In view of the above, I do not find any substantial question of law involved in this appeal. Consequently, this second appeal, having no merit, is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya