IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 16881 of 2009 Between: E.Devender S/o Lae E.Atma Ram H.No.7-1-100 Ferozguda Bowenpally,Secunderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Secunderabad Cantonment Board Rep.by its Executive Officer, Court Complex, Secunderabad 2 Smt.M.Laxmamma W/o.Late M.Late M.Shankaraiah 5-80 Mallikarjuna Colony Old Bowenpally,Secunderabad 3 Narasimha Yadav S/o.Late M.Late M.Shankaraiah 5-80 Mallikarjuna Colony Old Bowenpally,Secunderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ direction or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of 1st respondent in not taking any action on petitioners representations dated 05-02-2008 as illegal, unjust, arbitrary and it tantamounts to abdication of its Statutory duties and consequently direct the respondent No 1 to remove demolish the illegal and unauthorized constructions carried on in premises No 1-6-319 Old No 223&238 Bowenpally,backside of Zilla Parishad School for Boys Secunderabad Cantonment in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.R.CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.16881 of 2009 Order: The main grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that though he made representations, dated 05.02.2008 and 15.02.2008, to the first respondent seeking to remove/demolish the illegal and unauthorized constructions carried on by respondents 2 and 3 in premises bearing No.1-6-319 (old Nos.233 and 238) situated at Bowenpally, Backside of Zilla Parishad School for Boys, Secunderabad Cantonment, no action has been taken thereon so far. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following direction: The first respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the representations purported to have been made by the petitioner on 05.02.2008 and 15.02.2008, in accordance with law expeditiously, after issuing notice to respondents 2 and 3. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date:17.08.2009 VGB