IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 5028 of 2010 Date of decision: 19.03.2010 Mukesh Kumar s/o Sh. Ramphal Sharma ...... PETITIONER VERSUS Union of India and others ....... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present: Mr. S.S.Godara, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner contends that for the relief which the petitioner has claimed in the present petition, he has already preferred a representation dated 29.09.2009 (Annexure P-10), which has not been considered and decided by respondent No. 2 till date. He contends that the petitioner, at this stage, would be satisfied if the said representation is considered and decided within some specified time and order conveyed to the petitioner. Without going into the merits of the case nor commenting thereon, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the representation dated 29.09.2009 (Annexure P-10) within a period of two months' from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and decision conveyed to the petitioner forthwith. ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) JUDGE March 19, 2010 pj