IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.316 of 2010 LALMUNI DEVI, wife of Late Dhankuber Tiwary, resident of Village Bansdila, P.O. & P.S. Kopa, District Saran (Chapra) ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga through its Registrar. 4. The Vice-Chancellor, Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. 5. The Registrar, Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. 6. The Principal, Bharat Mishra Sanskrit College, Chapra, District Saran. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 7.1.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-University. The grievance of the petitioner is that the entire retiral dues of her husband, who was a Senior Clerk in Bharat Mishra Sanskrit College, Chapra, District Saran and died on 21st of December, 2006 after his retirement in February, 2002, have not been paid till date. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent- University submits that the left out grievances, if any, shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Registrar, Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University, Darbhanga (respondent no.5). In case such a 2 representation is filed stating the details of the unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of eight weeks, respondent no.5 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in her representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner as raised in her representation could be redressed without further delay and the admissible amount, if any, could also be paid with statutory interest, if any. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)