-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 846 OF 2006 APPEAL NO. 846 OF 2006 APPEAL NO. 846 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2828 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 2828 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 2828 OF 2004 Nariman Bhavan Premises Co-op. Society Ltd., & Anr. .. Appellants. V/s. The Municipal Corporation of Brihan Mumbai & Anr. .. Respondents. --- Mr. Arif Doctor with Ms.Vijaya Mishra i/by M/s. India Law Alliance for the Appellants. Mr.Vinod Mahadik i/by Mr.S.H.Ujjainwala & Ors. for the Respondent No.1. --- CORAM : R.M.LODHA & S.A.BOBDE,JJ. CORAM : R.M.LODHA & S.A.BOBDE,JJ. CORAM : R.M.LODHA & S.A.BOBDE,JJ. DATED : 07th DECEMBER, 2006 DATED : 07th DECEMBER, 2006 DATED : 07th DECEMBER, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . We heard Mr. Arif Doctor, the counsel for the Appellants. 2. The learned counsel does not dispute that the judgment of this court in Municipal Corporation of Municipal Corporation of Municipal Corporation of Brihanmumbai v/s. Dalamal Tower Premises Co-operative Brihanmumbai v/s. Dalamal Tower Premises Co-operative Brihanmumbai v/s. Dalamal Tower Premises Co-operative Society Ltd., 2006 (3) Bom.C.R. 557, Society Ltd., 2006 (3) Bom.C.R. 557, Society Ltd., 2006 (3) Bom.C.R. 557, concludes the issue raised in the Appeal. In this view of the matter, the learned single Judge cannot be said to have erred in dismissing the writ petition. -: 2 :- 3. The Appeal does not deserve to be admitted and hence dismissed. (R.M.LODHA,J.) (S.A.BOBDE,J.) .......