1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 314 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 314 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 314 OF 2007 IN IN IN L.P.A. NO. 175 OF 2006 L.P.A. NO. 175 OF 2006 L.P.A. NO. 175 OF 2006 Somnath Tulshiram Galande. .. Applicant. vs. Presiding Officer, IInd Labour Court, Pune & Ors. .. Respondents. The Applicant in person.. Mr.V.N. Tayade for respondent. .. CORAM: J.N. PATEL & CORAM: J.N. PATEL & CORAM: J.N. PATEL & A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE: 8TH OCTOBER, 2007. DATE: 8TH OCTOBER, 2007. DATE: 8TH OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. . This Court on earlier occasion has disposed of the LPA by remitting the matter to the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge after hearing the parties has passed a speaking order. Aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Single Judge, the applicant has filed this application for restoration of LPA No. 175 of 2006 which has already been disposed of by this Court and orders therein have been acted upon. 2 Therefore, such an application is not maintainable. If the applicant is aggrieved by the subsequent order passed by the learned Single Judge he should prefer a Letters Patent Appeal in the matter if it is maintainable rather than moving such an application. Therefore, with the aforesaid observation, the application is rejected. (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. )