1 Pukh Raj Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2389/1995) Dated : 04.03.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA. Mr. M.S. Singhvi, for the petitioner. Mr. B.L. Bhati, Additional Government Counsel, for the respondents This writ petition is directed against the order dated 27.6.95 (Annexure-7) passed by the District Education Officer (Boys), Pali, whereby the services of the petitioner as Teacher Gr.III have been terminated on the ground that the certificate of Diploma of Secondary School Teachers of Visually Handicapped obtained by the petitioner from the National School for Visually Handicapped Dehradun Centre Blind Relief Association, New Delhi, is not recognized by the State Government. It is to be noticed that while appointment being accorded to the petitioner on the post of Teacher Gr.III vide order dated 31.3.95 (Annexure-5), it was specifically mentioned that the petitioner shall produce appropriate certificate confirming that training acquired by him is recognized for appointment of teacher in general category. However, the petitioner failed to produce the requisite certificate, therefore, a reminder was issued on 29.04.95, directing him to produce the requisite certificate. However, the petitioner failed to produce the requisite 2 certificate, therefore, vide order dated 27.6.95 (Annexure-7), the petitioner's services have been brought to an end. It is stated by the learned counsel that probably the petitioner has already been appointed in some other educational institution however, he has no definite information regarding his employment elsewhere. Be that as it may, the petitioner having failed to produce the requisite certificate confirming that the certificate of Diploma for Secondary School Teachers of Visually Handicapped acquired by him is recognized for appointment on the post of Teacher Gr.III in general category, the impugned order passed by the respondents cannot be faulted with. Moreover, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, no relief can be granted to the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. (SANGEET LODHA), J. vij