IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2008 / 20TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 12034 of 2006(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ VASUDEVAN PILLAI, S/O.KRISHNA PILLAI AGED 58 YEARS, PANTHALATH BUNGLOW, ST.JAMES ROAD, THYKKOODAM,COCHIN-682 014. BY ADV. SRI.P.J.JOSEPH PANIKKASSERY SRI.TOM THOMAS (THRIKKAKARA) RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. SPECIAL TAHASILDAR(LA) COLLECTORATE, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.BASANT BALAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX(WPC 12034 OF 2006) PETITIONER'S EXTS.: EXT.P1: PHOTO COPY OF CLAIM STATEMENT DT. 3.1.2006. EXT.P2: PHOTO COPY OF PETITION DT. 3.1.2006. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.12034 of 2006 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 10th June, 2008 JUDGMENT No representation for the petitioner in this Writ Petition which is remaining defective since 27.7.2006 on the reason that process has not been remitted for taking out notice. It is seen that the grievance of the petitioner is that the land acquisition officer has not favourably considered Ext.P2 reference application submitted by the petitioner. The learned Government Pleader submits that in all probability Ext.P2 has been rejected by the land acquisition officer. Whatever that be, the Government does not have a case that the petitioner has been informed about the decision on Ext.P2. Under these circumstances, I dispose of the Writ Petition directing the 2nd respondent to intimate the decision if already taken on Ext.P2 to the petitioner or to take a decision on Ext.P2 ( if decision is not taken) within two months of the petitioner making available a copy of this judgment. Either way, the petitioner should be informed of about the decision. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE