IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 30TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 35681 of 2010(I) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- V.P.WILSON, S/O. PAILY, AGED 47 YEARS, VELUTHEPPILLY HOUSE, PARAPPURAM P.O., ALUVA TALUK, ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS. SRI.BYJU KURIAKOSE SRI.GEORGE SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI. R1 & R2 BY GOVT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 35681 of 2010 ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 30th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T Ext.P1 is the tender invited by the respondents for supply of drinking water in tanker lorries. Petitioner submitted his tender and the tenders were opened on 19-08-2010. He was later informed that he will not be called for negotiation. It is aggrieved by the above, this writ petition is filed. 2. Pleadings in the writ petition itself show that the petitioner did not produce the required documents, in terms of clause 14 of Ext.P1 tender notification. A reading of clause 14 of Ext.P1 shows that along with the tender, the documents mentioned therein, ought to have been produced by the tenderer. Admittedly, the petitioner did not produce such documents. Therefore, the tender submitted by him was defective and if that be so, the respondent is not liable to consider his tender or call him for negotiation. Writ petition fails and it is dismissed. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks