WP(C) 8149/2003 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B P KATAKEY None appears for the petitioner. I have heard Mr N Goswami, learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 4th September 2003 passed by the Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Guwahati, in O.A. no.6/2002, a nd the consequential notice dated 10th September 2003 published in a local daily namely The Asomiya Pratidin. The said order is appelable under Section 30 of the Recovery of Dues Due to Banks and Financial Institution Act, 1993. The dispute raised cannot, conveniently, be decided in a writ proceeding . It can be conveniently decided by the appellate authority in exercise of its a ppellate powers. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed. It would, however, not debar the petitioner to approach the appellate authority, with application seek ing condonation of delay, if so advised. Interim order, if any, passed earlier s tands vacated.