1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 99 OF 1998 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 618 OF 1995 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 144 OF 2009 IN TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 99 OF 1998 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 618 OF 1995 Amrutlal C. Bhagat ...Plaintiff. Vs. Shailesh Shah C.A. of Mayura B. Lekinwda ...Defendant. Mr. N.C. Parekh i/by M/s. Mansukhlal Hiralal & Co. for the Plaintiff. Mr. Pankaj C. Kansara for Caveator. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 24th November, 2009. P.C.- 1 The parties have settled the matter out of the Court. The caveator has filed objection dated 17/09/1998. The Petition converted into the suit. Now, the caveator is not pressing the said 2 objection and want to withdraw the same and accordingly authorized her constituent power of attorney Mr. Shailesh Shah to withdraw the present caveat. The constituent power of attorney Mr. Shailesh Shah is present in the Court. There are no other caveators. 2 The statement is made at bar by the learned counsel appearing for the parties that Smt. Mayura, who is the caveator understood the effect of this withdrawal and in fact instructed to withdraw the same, in view of the settlement between the parties. 3 In view of this, the present caveat/objection is permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. 4 The Petition be proceeded in accordance with law. The office to expedite the proceedings. 5 The certified copy is expedited. 6 The Petitioner is not pressing the Notice of Motion and it is therefore, also disposed of as withdrawn. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)