IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 312 of 1990 Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- PRABHUDAS PARSOTTAMDAS Versus MOHANLAL K SOLANKI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BHARAT J SHELAT for Petitioners MR SURESH M SHAH for Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 07/07/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he has been informed by learned counsel for the respondent that the matter is settled between the parties and that therefore, the respondent has taken away the papers pertaining to this revision from learned counsel for the respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioners further states that three independent communications have been sent to the petitioner in respect of this matter, but the petitioners have not responded nor given any instructions in the matter. 2. It would, therefore, appear that the parties are no longer interested in pursuing the present revision application. The same is accordingly disposed of. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Interim relief stands vacated. Liberty to apply in case of difficulty upto 6th October 2000. ****** *ar*