1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.4138 OF 2009. 1. SAU. DIPALI KRISHNA THOTANGE .. PETITIONER/S. VERSUS 1. KRISHNA MADHUKAR THOTANGE. .. RESPONDENT/S. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Shri Ritesh Badhe, Advocate for Petitioner. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 29, 2009. 1. This petition is directed against an order passed by learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Akola rejecting petitioner’s application for amendment of written statement after the evidence of other side was over. In the amendment sought, first sentence is that the defendant was beaten and threat to her life was created when she was residing with the plaintiff. Now, this is something which she would have known when she filed written statement and there is no question of her coming to know after the evidence of the plaintiff was tendered. Next amendment sought is that after she returned to her parental home and the plaintiff and his brothers entered into some agreement to get the plaintiff re-married. Now, no particulars are given as to who gave this information and on what date. 2 2. If the petitioner was serious about proving the plea all the necessary particulars should have been given. The learned Judge has rightly rejected the application. No interference is called for. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE RR.