1 WP 6560/10 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6560 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. Rameshwar Gite for the petitioner. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 17TH AUGUST 2010 P.C. : 1. The writ petition is directed against an interlocutory order and calls for no interference. 2. In a suit for specific performance filed by the respondent (plaintiff) against the petitioner, he sought an injunction claiming that he was in possession of the suit property under an agreement for sale. The trial court held that the respondent (plaintiff) was in possession of the 2 WP 6560/10 property and granted the injunction. The lower appellate court confirmed the finding that the respondent was in possession of the property and granted the injunction. The finding that the respondent was in possession of the property is a possible finding of fact requiring no interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Writ petition is rejected summarily. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)