1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1075 OF 2008 DIST.: RATNAGIRI Hamid Shami Shaha ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. Through jail – The Petitioner has been produced. Mrs. A.S. Pai, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the Respondent. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATE : JULY 28, 2008 P.C.:- The prisoner has been produced. We had asked for his production, as he had made an application for parole to visit his mother, who lives in Madhya Pradesh.The petitioner is serving sentence in two cases – In one case, he was tried in M.P. and in the other case, he was tried in Maharashtra. We had asked for his presence to know from him if he could stay within the State of Maharashtra during parole. His request for grant of parole could be considered. But the prisoner 2 submits that it will not be possible for him to stay in Maharashtra during his parole leave, and he will like to go to M.P. In the circumstances, we are unable to accept the plea of the petitioner, which is accordingly rejected. 2. The petitioner submits that he has already moved an application for his transfer from the jail in Maharashtra to a jail in M.P. in which State his family lives. If such an application is made, that application should be decided within a period of two months. 3. The prisoner may be taken back. 4. The petition is accordingly disposed of. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.