^)PC4)101<L/^ ® : 10 p91§6|o^ GA %^9^^^ BSFOBE IHB M,P< SSA3'E A2^IMISTIATI^B 'miBm&L, E&INCIML BENEK, JftBAI^M* 0,A» N©.%^SBof1994 •^ APPLICANT ; ^Petitioner) Kiaaar ^rivastava, Soa of Shri @iri.,ja SMaaker Shplvastava, aged at»out 27 years, resldent; ©fG/o Amblio^ Shrivasta^i> F©odlaspector, Maalndragarti, Blstriet Sargti3a> ^adhya Pradesh* VEBSBSi BESPO®@NTS : 1o State of Madlaya Pradesh, tMro^igli s She Seeretary, TrdLbal, Sched^led Caste & ^/l^a^e Baekward dass Madhya Pradesfe, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal* 2» C@®aissio®er,Trlteal ©evelo^aieat,Madhya Pi^desh, Bhogalo 5« Assistsuat C©iamissiQaer, Tribal Bevelopmeirfc, AmbiKapur, Mstrict Sargu^a, m.p^ 4-» Blocte Edtieati^a Officer (Tribal Welfare), ^suaiadra- garh, Dlstriot Sargtija, M«P» 5« Ihe Collector, Sarg®<}a,Mstrict Sargu^a, M.P« ••^•^ - 2 - APPLICATI0K WI^B SECTB®19 ©FTHE ABKMSra&SIVE TRIB^NM^ AGT» 1985 --L_ APPLICANT PETJTIONER RESPONDENTS HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BiLASPUR WR!T PETiTION (S) No. 1012 of 2005 Subodh Kumar Shrivastava. VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh & Others. APPLICATION UNDER SECTiON 19 OF THE ADMiNiSTRATiVE TRIBUNAL ACT. 1985 SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. J. Present: None for the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyerforthe State ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 24th day of October, 2009) 1. The matter is catled for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behaif of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2. in view of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner, forthwith. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge Gowri