§ENGLE §EN$H IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION s No. a$ol OF 2010 f, PETITIONER Anand Ram, aged about 52 years S/o Late Shri Nawa Ram; Caste Munda (Schedule Tribe) Occupation Service, Working as Station House Officer, Police Station-Janjgir Cha‘mpa , District - Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh VERSUS / RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Home (Police), Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Director General of Police-cum—Chairman of State Police Establishment Board, Police HeadquartersLRaipur, Chhattisgarh 3/ inspector General of Police (Administration) Police Headquarters, Raiur, Chhattisgarh Inspector General of Police, Bilaspur Range, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Superintendent of Police, District Janjgir— Champa, Chhattisgarh RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OR WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI, ,PROHIBITION, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDERS OR ORDERS OR THE LIKE ,M p W PETITEONER V HQGH CGURT OF CHHATTZSGARH : BJLASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 2502 OF 2010 Ananci Ram Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Cihers (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Simte Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. RESPONDENTS Present :— Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, Advocafe for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panet Lawyer for the State. ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 02” day of August, 201 1) Learned counset appearing for the petitioner would submit that in View of the ‘provisions contained in Section 22 of the Chhattisgarh Poiice Act, 2007 (for short ”the Act, 2007‘? the petitioner is emitted to prefer a representation against the impugned transfer order dated 721 t .2009 (Annexure P4) passed by the State Poiice Establishment Board. He would further submit that he has aiready preferred a representation before the State Government. However, probabiy in View of pendency of this writ petition, the representation has been i ket pending. Learned counsei prays for withdrawai of the writ petition with liberty to prefer a fresh representation in terms of Section 22 of the Act, 2G0? and further prays for a direction to the State Government to decide the same within stipuiated time. 3. in view of the above, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this writ petttion with liberty to prefer a representation before the State Government in terms of Section 22(3) of the Act, 2007, and if such representation is filed within a period of four weeks from today, the same shali be disposed of within six months, as provided under Section 22(3) of the Act, 2007. The interim order granted by this Court shaii continue during pendency of his representation before the State Government. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated iiberty. ashok p