IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2011 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 26855 of 2008(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- PRIVATE LIMITED, STOP BUS OWNERS ASSOCIATION, KODUNGALLOOR, REP. BY SECRETARY. BY ADV. SMT.K.S.SABITHA SMT.K.S.SANTHI SMT.T.J.SEEMA RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER, ERNAKULAM. 3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM. 4. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (TRAFFIC), ERNAKULAM. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.BENNY GERVACIS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/03/2011, ALONG WITH WPC NO. 27327 OF 2008 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 26855 of 2008(V) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT. P1(A) : TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT NO.P.ST.8/5/1996. EXT.P1(B) : TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT NO.P.ST.5/9/94/R. EXT.P1(C) : TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT NO.P.ST.8/14/1997. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE PAPER REPORT DATED 10.08.2008. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R2(A) : TRUE COPY OF THE RPROPOSAL FOR RE-ARRANGEMENT IN THE TRAFFIC SYSTEM DISCUSSED IN THE MEETING CONVENED ON 22.08.2008. EXT.R2(B) : TRUE OCPY OF THE REPORT APPEARED IN THE MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY DATED 29.08.2008. /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE J.Chelameswar, C.J. & Antony Dominic, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) Nos. 26855, 27327, 36841 of 2008 35573 of 2009, 32568 of 2010, 3930, 6322 and 6614 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 31st day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT J.Chelameswar, C.J. All these writ petitions are more or less identical. The substance of the grievance in all these writ petitions is already recorded by this Court by order dated 17.03.2007 and the background in which such a grievance raised is also recorded. After hearing all the parties, by the abovementioned order we directed the official respondents to come out with a proposal for finding a solution to the problem projected by these writ petitions. 2. Today when the matter is taken up, a statement is filed on behalf of respondents 1 to 3 indicating the proposed plan of action which is to be operative for a limited period of time i.e., until the new bus stand at 'Vyttila' becomes operational. The various steps proposed by respondents 1 to 3 are indicated in the report and a map is attached along with the report. WP(c) No. 26855 of 2008 and connected cases. -:2:- 3. All the counsel appearing for the various petitioners submit that they have no objection for the proposals made by the respondents and agree to operate their service in accordance with the abovementioned proposal. 4. The only request made by respondents 1 to 3 is that in the existing bus stand of 'Kaloor' which is owned and run by the Cochin Corporation, appropriate markings are to be made for the implementation of the proposals contained in the report filed today. The learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation, Sri.P.Fazil submits that all necessary appropriate steps would be taken by the Corporation expeditiously, preferably within a week. In the circumstances, all the writ petitions are disposed of without any further directions in this regard. J.Chelameswar, Chief Justice. Antony Dominic, Judge. ttb WP(c) No. 26855 of 2008 and connected cases. -:3:-