IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. ASHOK KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 1581 of 2007 Between: V. Kiran Kumar S/o. David Paul V., Hindu, Male (Terminating from Service) O/o. Dy. Commissiokner (CT) Vijayawada-I Division, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2 The Secretary to Government, General Administration (Service) Department, 3 The Principal Secretarya, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 4 The Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 5 Palleti Raja Babu S/o. Surayya Abids Division, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for records in OA No. 202 of 2007 dt. 22-1-2007 of the A.P.Administrative Tribunal and quash the same and directed the respondents to declare that the petitioner is entitle to continue in the existing Post i.e, Commercial Tax Officer. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.RAJENDRA BUSSA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Smt. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S. ASHOK KUMAR W.P. No. 1581 of 2007 O R D E R: (Per THE HON’BLE Smt. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI) This writ petition is filed against the order dated 22.1.2007 passed in O.A. No. 202 of 2007 on the file of A.P. Administrative Tribunal. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. The case of the petitioner is that consequent to striking down of A.P. Act 20 of 2000 i.e. A.P. Scheduled Caste Rationalisation of Reservation Act by the Supreme Court he approached the Tribunal and obtained orders in his favour and he was selected to the post of Commercial Tax Officer. While the matter stood thus, the 4th respondent issued proceedings No.CCTS Ref.No.D(4)/945/2006 dated 30.12.2006 terminating his services as Commercial Tax Officer with immediate effect, without giving any opportunity. It is further stated that as per the judgment of the Supreme Court, selections of Group-I service are to be revised by the 1st respondent i.e. APPSC, but in his the 1st respondent has not revised the selections and the 4th respondent terminated his service as Commercial Tax Officer. A perusal of the order passed by the Tribunal goes to show that the Tribunal proposed to issue notice to the respondents before admission but as the petitioner herein insisted for instant orders, basing on the primate facie material, dismissed the O.A. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the considered view that the ends of justice would meet by remanding the matter to the Tribunal for fresh consideration after hearing the parties. Accordingly, the impugned order passed by the Tribunal is set aside and the matter is remitted to the Tribunal for fresh disposal after hearing the parties. The respondents are directed to file counter before the Tribunal on or before 16th June, 2008 and the O.A. be disposed of by the Tribunal on or before 31st July, 2008 in accordance with law. The writ petition is allowed and the matter is remitted to the Tribunal as above. T. MEENA KUMARI, J. S. ASHOK KUMAR, J. Date: 15-04-2008. MVB.