HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI56ARH AT BILASPUR W.P.No.2891/2006 CORAM:Hon'bleShriS.R.Ndyak;ChiefJusTice<&, Hon'ble 5hri Dflip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. 4S PEJTtrONER RESPONOENTS Arjun Kumar Lal Namdeo, aged 49 years, son of late Shri Ashr-afi Lal Namdeo, Adyocate, resident of Pendro, •tehsil Pendro Road & district Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Versus 1. 5tate of Cbhattisgarh through the Secretary, department of Seneral Administration, Raipur (C.&) 2. The District Collector, Bilaspur district, BHaspur (Chhattjsgarh) 3. The 5ub-t)iyisionai Officftr (Revenue), Bilaspur. 4. The Tehsilckir, Bilaspur tehsil, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) . 5. The ProprietOr/Manager'/Leaseholder of the E-Sdngwari, near tehsil office, Bilasfiur (Chhattisgdrh) Shri Somna-t+i Verma for thepetitioner. Shri Prcshant MiShra, Addl. Advocate Senerat for the State. ORALORDER (Passedon 5.4.2006) The following oral order of the Court vsas passed by S.R.NAYAK, C.J. Ths petitioner who is a practicing advocate labouring under an impression that memorandum issued by the Collector, Bihspur.on 3.9.2004 a copy of which is producerfand marked as ^nnexure R/S at page 19 of the ma+erki! papers, whereby +he Collector has jmposed a bar on appearance of the advocates who want to appear on behalf of applicaints willing to ayail of benefits in the scheme called E-ISangwari Scheme, has filed this writ petit'on. In the rstyrn filedsn behalf of respondents No.l to 4, theCollectQr hcis stated that no bar is imposed •B -z 49 on the learned roembers of the Bar from appearing for the beneficiaries who want to avail of benefits of E-Sangwari. 2. We have perused Annsxure R/5. We do not find any bar on appearance of the advocates who wish to appear on behalf of the beneficiaries to avail of benefits under E-Sangwari Scheme. 3. The writ petition is misconceivsd and it is accorcfingly dismissed. Sd/- Cbief3ustice Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge J__-.-,-