IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33222 of 2010 SUNIL YADAV S/O LATE YADU NANDAN YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.36506 of 2010 BHAGIRATH YADAV S/O SUBEY @ SUBA GOPE Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.10.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 341, 342, 504 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner Sunil Yadav filed a case against the deceased for having given an injection to the 3 years old child of the petitioner on account of which he died thereafter a mob gathered and variously assaulted the deceased in retaliation for which the present case was instituted. Considering the background of the case, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five 2 thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Harnaut P.S. Case No. 63/2010, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on 3 ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (v) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )