IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4327 of 2008 Date of decision: 27.03.2009 Harminder Kaur @ Harmohinder Kaur ...Petitioner versus M/s Gagan Traders and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr. Arun Palli, Senior Advocate with Mr.Karamvir Singh Kang, Advocate with Mr.Divanshu Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Monika Goyal,Advocate for respondent Nos.1 & 2. 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. The matter is in revision against the order of the Appellate Court refusing to accede to the request of the landlord for fixation of a higher amount as rent. During the pendency of appeal filed, there was an order of stay in operation at the instance of the tenant. The Appellate Authority had merely directed the payment of the agreed amount upon which the revision has been filed. 2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner states that without prejudice to the contentions raised by the respective parties, he would be satisfied if the appeal is directed to be disposed of at the earliest, having regard to the fact that there is already an order of ejectment passed against the tenant. Civil Revision No.4327 of 2008 - 2 - 3. Having regard to the limited prayer that the learned Senior Counsel is making, I deem it appropriate to give such direction to the Appellate Authority requesting him to dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four months and report to this Court. 4. Revision is disposed of in the above terms. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 27.03.2009 sanjeev