•^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF^eHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. 7e^/ PETITIONER ^^ >/"'<^.. ^ "?••'/\y .-•'• _/rcy (y><y^ -'>'' ..-•"' .•^•^:"y >-%-:'f //- '^^s^ ^^f RESPONDENTS /Smt. Sulochna, aged about 56 / years, Wd/o Late Dukalu Ram, resident of Ram Nagarm, behind B.N.C. Mills , Ward No. 5 Rajnandgaon (CG). VERSUS l^The State of Chhatdsgarh, < Through the Secretary Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Ed,uqation OfBcer, Districfey EducatioiP^e&tara , Distt.-Dufg (C.G.) ~< 3. Block Education Officer y.4. Block Education Office District Durg (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF_IND1A. Saja, il- XI-HC-22 311^1 ^il R-li.'* aig?; ^HW^Tf?^ -^ ' :'^;:-^C'f>-;fc^^^^^ -^•atiqigq, (te{lyi|(i,,f««1l^y. • . 3TI^?T •qg^ tlltidl *t<l* "„ ^ v _ " ^ WI '200 ,'&^.A^^&" Sfl^T WIRIT'HftcT ^ 8-2-2006 Smt. Renu Kochar, cot|i Shri G.K.Beriwal.Dy. Heard. The case is listedtoda^ Tha defauit is condohetl By this petition under. petitioner seeks relief that Gl$ be paid to herwith interest. Learned counsel for husband was working in the as Head Master. He died amount of GiS and Family Wf submltted an application da^ dues to the Block' Education tetter dated 27-10-2004 Bemetara and it was admitt^t Funa' and G!S has not been Officer vide ietter dated 2-j Educatioti Officer to make Counsel fpr the petitioner sujii paid to the petitioner, she Education Officer. Saja as Insei for the petitioner. Adv. General, for the State. D#r ^Nlfl'41'T ^IH^ff^ IsLdi •(.1^1-^K ^? aiPtTti an^i. 'fororders on defauit. f. Office to registered the petitton. ftrticie 226/227 ofthe Constitution ofindia, the l^ amount and amount of Family Weifare Fund |the petitioner submits that the petitioner's Educafion Department and retired from service cjn 4-5-1993. Counsei submits {hat when the felfare Fund was not paid to the petitioner she ^ed 20-9-2004 (Annexure-P/2) for payment of pfficer, Saja which wac forwarded by him vide (An|nexure-P/3) to the District Education Officer, by him that the amount of Famliy Welfare jpaid to the petitioner. The District Education j11-2004 (Annexure-P/4) directed the Block iiayment to the petitioner as per the ruies. that thereafter when the amount was not hiade a detaiied representation to the Block Annexure P-5 butthe amount has not been itt*d sujsmits [Tl^tfigit XI-HC-22 ^•f.CP' ^-^) ^o. S7^-2-/Stxf '3'sg •^l'illd'1!, tSfll'H'lc, fa'ni'My MrHMTShHlcb^.{. ^y/°r sn^i^ii R;-ficb S^V ?b*flcb ^I^? p/- •311^1 TOH^K'g^g ^ 2-- paiu. Having considered the f^ record and since the petitioneff cht^4}'T *ii^<riT'^ 'f^yl <Ri(^J1< ^? aifigii sn^r cts and circumstartces and the material on is a widow and the amount of G.I.S. and Famiiy Welfare Fund has not b^en paid to fte her since last 11 years even after the direction. of the Distric< dues be paid to the petitioner the date of production / receipt of Accordingiy, the petitfon i^ ailowed. Certified copy as per rulefe. Copy fo the State couns is complied with. Education Officer, it is directed that a!l the lositiveiy withil'i a period of two months from Facopyofthisorder. >1, who shai! be obtiged to see ttiat t^e order ^L Sd?- Fakhruddin Judge [TT^ ^R^^.