1 CRWP NO.649/2010 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 41. WP/649/2010 PANDURANG BHIVAJI BIRADAR [Criminal] V/S RUKMINIBAI PANDURANG BIRADAR -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. A.V.Patil, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. V.H.Dighe, APP for State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 28-2-2011 1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant/husband. An application in terms of Exh.35 in maintenance proceedings was moved, seeking medical examination of respondent (wife), as the petitioner/husband felt, in the light of admitted evidence of no sex between the couple, the wife had sex life after parting the company. Rejection of such application by learned Judge, with reasons assigned, does not smell of any perversity or any illegality. The husband, if is so keen to brand the wife as living in adultery, has other ways and means to get it established - medical examination, 2 CRWP NO.649/2010 by itself, is not root cause to do so. It is persecution and humiliation too, to the wife/respondent. The learned Judge was certainly justified in rejecting the application. No merits. Writ Petition dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/649-10crwp