IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6583 of 2010 SUCHITA DEVI wife of Devkant Prasad Resident of Lakhansarai tej Singh, P.S-Lalganj dist-Vaishali. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Welfare Department, government of bihar, Patna. 2. The Director of Welfare, Government, Bihar Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Cum-Collector, Vaishali. 4. The Sub divisional Officer, lalganj, Vaishali. 5. The executive magistrate, Vaishali. 6. The Child Development Project Officer, lalganj. 7. The District Programme Officer, Vaishali. ----------- 2 5.1.2011 Petitioner’s appointment as Anganbari Sevika, was cancelled by District Programme Officer Vaishali, by his order dated 22.12.2008 as contained in Annexure-4. In a enquiry it was found that the petitioner was not distributing the take home ration promptly, therefore, there was lapses on her part in her duties as Anganbari Sevika. Hence the petitioner was disengaged. Petitioner preferred an appeal before the Commissioner against the said order which has also been dismissed vide order contained in Annexure-1. There is no dispute in respect of the fact that petitioner had not distributed the take home ration in time and promptly. The only contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the villagers were satisfied with the 2 functioning of the petitioner, which is evident from Annexure-6 series. There being no complaint against the petitioner by the villagers cannot be a ground to hold that the petitioner had performed her duties sincerely and efficiently. Her disengagement is on facts which have been found correct by the Appellate Authority also. In the Circumstances, this Court does not find any merit in the writ application and does not find any reason to interfere with the impugned orders. The writ application is dismissed. Prakash ( J.N.Singh, J.)