HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.230 OF 2005 AND Crl.R.C.M.P.Nos.629 AND 630 OF 2011 IN CRl.R.C.No.230 of 2005 Dated 24-2-2011 Crl.R.C.M.P.No.629 of 2011: Between: Puramaneni Bitramnaidu and others. ..Petitioners. And: The State of A.P., represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. …Respondent. Crl.R.C.M.P.No.630 of 2011: Between: Yerana Simhachalam. ..Petitioner/Defacto complainant. And: Puramaneni Bitramnaidu. …Respondent. Crl.R.C.No.230 of 2005: Between: Puramaneni Bitramnaidu and others. ..Petitioners. And: The State of A.P., represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. …Respondent. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.230 OF 2005 AND Crl.R.C.M.P.Nos.629 AND 630 OF 2011 IN CRl.R.C.No.230 of 2005 COMMON JUDGMENT: The Criminal Revision Case is filed by the revision petitioners-accused against the judgment dated 7-2-2005 passed in Crl.A.No.118 of 2004 on the file of the II Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court,) Parvathipuram confirming the conviction and sentence imposed on them by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Bobbili in S.C.No.107 of 2003 dated 6- 8-2004. The revision petitioners are A.1 to A.3 respectively before the trial Court. They were prosecuted for the offences under Sections 354 and 325 I.P.C. read with Section 34 I.P.C. in S.C.No.107 of 2003 on the file of the Court of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Bobbili, and they were found guilty and convicted for the offence under Section 325 I.P.C. read with 34 I.P.C and sentenced to undergo R.I. for two years and also to pay a fine of Rs.500/- each, in default S.I. for three months, while A1 was acquitted for the offence under section 354 I.P.C. The revision petitioners, aggrieved by the said impugned judgment and conviction of the said trial court, preferred Criminal Appeal No.118 of 2004 on the file of the II Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C.) Parvathipuram. However, the said appellate Court after hearing both sides and after appreciating the evidence and other material on record was pleased to dismiss the appeal by its order dated 7-2-2005 confirming the judgment and conviction awarded by the trial Court. As against the said impugned judgment of the first appellate Court, A.1 to A.3 preferred the present revision. While the mater stood thus, today, the petitioners in the appeal filed Crl.R.C.M.P.No.629 of 2011 seeking to permit them to compound the case in question, under Section 320 (2) of Cr.P.C. When the matter is called, parties are present and they have admitted that they compromised the matter by settling their dispute out side the Court. The defacto complainant-victim has stated that she has no objection whatsoever if the petitioners- accused are ordered to be acquitted since she has entered into a compromise with them as they are interrelated and inhabitants of the same village. In these circumstances, this Court is of the view that permission under sub-section 2 of section 320 Cr.P.C. may be accorded and the same is hereby accorded permitting the parties to compound the offence under Section 325 I.P.C. Today, along with this Crl.R.C.M.P.No.629 of 2011, the defacto complainant filed Crl.R.C.M.P.No.630 of 2011 seeking to allow the present Crl.R.C.No.230 of 2005 by acquitting the petitioners-accused. In view of the compromise petition-cum-affidavit filed by the defacto-complainant stating that at the intervention of the village elders and well wishers of both sides and in view of their inter relationship as well as being the residents of same village, the matter was settled out of Court amicably and in view of the said settlement, she approached this court seeking to allow the Criminal Revision Case No.230 of 2005 by acquitting the petitioners-accused. In view of the same, these two Crl.R.C.M.Ps. are ordered. Consequently, this Criminal Revision Case is allowed acquitting the petitioners-accused for the offence under Section 325 of I.P.C. _________________________ Justice B.N.RAO NALLA Dated 24-2-2011. Dvs HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.230 OF 2005 AND Crl.R.C.M.P.Nos.629 AND 630 OF 2011 IN CRl.R.C.No.230 of 2005