CW 11810/09 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.11810/2009 Malti Versus Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal & Ors. Date of Order ::: 18/09/09 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Nawal Singh, for petitioner Petitioner while working as ANM and having remained posted in ESI Dispensary NO.1, Jaipur since 1987, was transferred to Tonk vide order dt.27/02/09, which was assailed by way of appeal-381/2009 but her appeal was dismissed by Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal vide judgment dt.18/08/09. Learned Tribunal in its judgment inter-alia observed that petitioner has been worked in ESI Dispensary NO.1, Jaipur since 1987 and in Jaipur district since 1978 and merely because a short time has left for her retirement; it cannot be considered as a basis for interference in order of transfer impugned. Transfer is otherwise an incidence of service. Petitioner cannot claim as a matter of right to remain posted at one station of her choice. She has not imputed any malice against the authority which has transferred her vide order impugned; nor alleged the transfer having been made in violation of statutory Rules – in CW 11810/09 //2// absence whereof, if the authority considered it appropriate to transfer her in the interest of administration or in exigency of service after she having rendered services at one place or station for almost 22 years, it cannot be said to be arbitrary action or being in violation of R.20 of Service Rules. This Court has gone through the judgment and does not find manifest error being committed by the Tribunal which may call for interference in the order impugned. Consequently, writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p.2/ 11810CW09Spt18-DsTrns.doc