1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORER NO.733 OF 2009 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.622 OF 2009 IN L.C. SUIT NO.1320 OF 2009 Mohanlal Chaganlal Seth. ..Appellant. Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay. ..Respondent. Mr.J.J.Shah for the Appellant. Mr. J.J.Xavier with Ms.K.K. Soren for the Respondent. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 28th July,2009 PC : 1. Matter is settled out of the court. The Advocate for the respondent-B.M.C. states that so far as Stall/Bakada admeasuring 6x3ft. which is mentioned in the prayer clause of the notice of motion and it is a structure having tin sheet wall 2 and tin sheet roof will not be demolished except due process of law. The Advocate for the plaintiff states that, in so far as prayer in respect of the open space admeasuring 8x7ft., the same will not be pressed and if the statement of the Advocate for the B.M.C. in respect of the Stall/Bakada is recorded, then the suit itself may be disposed off. Statement given by the Advocate for the B.M.C.is accepted. In this view of the matter, appeal as well as Suit No.1320 of 2009 stand disposed off. The City Civil Court to pass a formal order in this regard. 2. In view of the above order, civil application does not survive and the same is also disposed off. ( R.S.MOHITE, J.)