IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 15910 of 2006 Date of decision November 27, 2006 Rajesh and others .......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA. Present:- Sh. Inder Pal Goyat, Advocate for the petitioners. Sh. Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Ms. Daya Chaudhary, Additional Solicitor General of India for respondent No.3. Sh. Vinod Arya, Advocate for respondent No.4. None for respondent Nos.5 to 7. **** Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that since the termination order has already been withdrawn, therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infrucutous. (VINEY MITTAL) JUDGE November 27, 2006 archana (H.S. BHALLA) JUDGE