IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5681 of 2008 Harikant Suman, son of Kanhaiya Das, resident of village Kakar, P.S. Rahiyar Kochi, District- Samastipur. …………… Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through District Magistrate, Samastipur 2.The District Education Officer, Samastipur 3.The District Superintendent of Education, Samastipur 4.District Development Commissioner, Samastipur 5.The Block Development Officer, Shivajee Nagar, Rosera, Samastipur 6.The Block Education Extension Officer, Shivajee Nagar, Rosera, Samastipur 7.The Mukhia Laxmi Kant Gram Panchayat Raj, Rahiyar South, Shivajee Nagar, Rosera, Samastipur. …………… Respondents ----------- 2. 21/07/2011 From the impugned order of the Collector, Samastipur dated 31.12.2007, as contained in Annexure-9, it is apparent that before consideration of extension of re-engagement of the petitioner for the third time, law had changed and minimum qualification of Intermediate pass with 45% marks was prescribed as essential eligibility. Admittedly, petitioner was not possessing Intermediate qualification. Therefore, his re-engagement for the third time was denied from 1st March, 2005. The certificate of Intermediate, as contained in Annexure-4/2, shows that the petitioner had only appeared in the Intermediate Examination in March, 2005. 2 Petitioner claims that under some orders of some authority, he continued in the School and got his honorarium also, but that will not create any right in him to claim to be treated as re-engaged for the third time in view of the defect in his eligibility, as noted by the Collector in his order. In the circumstances, representation of the petitioner has been rightly rejected by the Collector. Therefore, this Court does not find any merit in the writ application. The same is accordingly dismissed. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)