CWP No.15596 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. DATE OF DECISION: 31.8.2010 Subhash Chander ...Petitioner VERSUS Chief Administrator Haryana and Anr. …Respondents CORAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI PRESENT: Mr.Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner Permod Kohli, J. (Oral) Notice of motion to respondent no.1 only. Mr.Naveen Gupta, Advocate who is present in Court has been asked to accept notice on behalf of the respondent no.1. Keeping in view the prayer made and with the consent of the counsel, this petition is disposed of at motion stage. The petitioner applied for the post of Assistant Secretary under the Hearing impairment Quota, in response to advertisement issued by respondent no.1. In the selection, respondent no.2 was placed at Sr. No.1 whereas petitioner was placed at Sr.No.2. Respondent no.2 has been selected and appointed. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent CWP No.15596 of 2010 2 no.2 had procured different certificates with different percentage of disability. According to petitioner, respondent no.2 has obtained fake and bogus certificates. The petitioner served a legal notice (Annexure P-6). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the respondent no.2 is directed to consider the legal notice and take a decision thereon. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.1 to take a decision on the legal notice (Annexure P-6) within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is furnished to the competent authority. However, it is directed that before deciding legal notice, respondent no.2 shall be put to notice and be afforded an opportunity of being heard alongwith the petitioner. Needless to say, in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, it shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 31.8.2010 MFK