IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY THURSDAY, THE 11TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 20TH KARTHIKA 1932 WA.No. 1782 of 2010() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.30785/2010 .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER: ------------------------ SONIA K.FRANCIS,AGED 21 YEARS, D/O.K.J.FRANCIS,KADAMANTHARA HOUSE, ELOOR SOUTH,UDYOGAMANDAL PO, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU SRI.JAGAN GEORGE SRI.K.A.NOUSHAD SRI.P.G.PRAMOD SRI.KANDAMPULLY RAHUL RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR,PRIYADARSINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS,KOTTAYAM. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS,OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS,SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. 4. MAR ATANASIUS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, KOTHAMANGALAM,REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL. ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY FOR R1,2 G.P. SRI.BASANT BALAJI FOR R3 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/11/2010, ALONG WITH WA NO.1789/2010 & CONN. CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JJ. .................................................................... Writ Appeal Nos.1782,1789,1798 & 1800 of 2010 .................................................................... Dated this the 11th day of November, 2010. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. The appellants have not passed in all subjects in the BCA course. However, having regard to the fact that they have written supplementary examinations in the failed subjects, they were allowed to participate in the Entrance Examination for admission to MCA course. Their case is that they have secured sufficiently high ranks in the Entrance Examination and have been allotted to various colleges for joining MCA course. In between, University has not published result of the supplementary examinations written by the appellants. Unless results are published and unless the appellants pass the examinations, they will not be eligible to join for MCA course. Therefore, Writ Petitions are filed for direction to the University to get the valuation done and publish the result in the supplementary examination written by the appellants without any delay. The learned Single Judge recorded submission of the University that results will be W.A. 1782/10 & conn. 2 published by 15th December, 2010. However, the further prayer for retaining appellants' allotments for admission to MCA course was not allowed by the learned Single Judge because appellants are not eligible for admission. We do not find any justification to interfere with the finding of the learned Single Judge because only graduates can join for a post-graduate course. However, the process of admission to MCA course will be over only by 31.12.2010 and by 15th of December the University has undertaken to publish the results. Therefore, we feel atleast those of the appellants who qualify in the BCA Examination after publication of the results of the supplementary examinations should be given admission based on allotments made. Accordingly these Writ Appeals are disposed of modifying the judgment of the learned Single Judge directing respondents to retain the allotments subject to the result of supplementary examination being published by University by 15th December, 2010. We make it clear that the University should ensure that publication of results is not delayed beyond the date stated above. The allotments made to such of the W.A. 1782/10 & conn. 3 candidates who fail in the examinations will stand cancelled on publication of results and others will be considered for admission based on the allotments made. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge BHABANI PRASAD RAY Judge pms