1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 940 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6263 OF 2005 (Suresh Balaji Challawar and others vs. State and another) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND R.V. MORE, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 15, 2008 Heard Shri Tajne, learned Counsel for the review petitioners and Shri Sonak, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. By this review petition, the review petitioners are seeking review of order dated 9.11.2006 passed by the Division Bench of this Court whereby Writ Petition No. 6263/2005 came to be dismissed. We have considered the contentions canvassed by the learned Counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order. Perusal of the impugned order shows that the 2 said writ petition was directed against the order dated 8.9.2004 passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal whereby original application filed by the review petitioners came to be dismissed in view of Circular dated 1.8.2003 issued by the State Government. The Division Bench of this Court also quoted in the impugned order the observations made by the Tribunal in para (9) of its order. Considering totality of the circumstances as well as conclusion arrived at by the Tribunal, the Division Bench of this Court found that no case was made out for showing indulgence in the writ petition and, therefore, same was dismissed. There are no new facts or circumstances including proposition of law, which were available to the review petitioners, but could not be placed at the time of hearing of the writ petition. In the absence thereof, it is difficult for us to show any indulgence in the review petition. The review petition is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE khj