IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.W.P. No.126 of 2007 Date of Decision:- 24.04.2007 Shanti Devi ....Petitioner(s) through By post. vs. State of Punjab ....Respondent(s) through Mr.Rajesh Bhardwaj, DAG, Punjab. *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. An application was received by post which was ordered to be treated as criminal writ petition. Notice of motion was issued and in response thereto, the respondents have filed their reply/affidavit in which it is averred that the petitioner has concealed the material facts inasmuch as against the petitioner's son F.I.R.No.34 dated 20.2.2001 under Sections 25, 54 and 59 of the Arms Act is registered at Police Station, Sirhind and he was legally arrested in the said case on 20.2.2001. It has been further averred that after the petitioner's son was bailed out, he jumped the bail orders and was declared a proclaimed offender by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehgarh Sahib vide order dated 30.10.2004. The petitioner's son, however, later on was apprehended and was produced before the Court on 6.2.2007. Reference to some other criminal cases registered against the petitioner's son has also been made. Crl.W.P. No.126 of 2007 -2- In the light of the stand taken by the respondents, no case to issue any direction is made out. Dismissed. April 24, 2007 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE