C.R.No.2882 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.2882 of 2009. Decided on August 25, 2009. Sudesh Chopra .. Petitioner VERSUS D.K.Agnihotri. .. Respondent * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI PRESENT Ms.Jyoti Sareen, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.B.D.Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner claims that it is a sum of Rs.4,70,000/- with interest of Rs.56,000/- which has already been paid and that the house which has been put for Court auction by issuing Warrant for sale deserved to be set aside, as Section 60(2) (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure, creates a bar against the attachment of residential house held by judgment debtor. In view of the substantial amount having been paid, the immovable property that too a residential house need not be sold . . . 1 C.R.No.2882 of 2009 in the present case. The petition is allowed. The order regarding sale of the house of the petitioner passed vide order dated 04.04.2009, is hereby set aside. It is made clear that this order will not debar the trial Court to pass effective orders for recovery of the remaining amount. It will be open to the respondent to seek the execution of the remaining amount due by filing application/(s) for attachment of any other property held by the judgment debtor. The amount of Rs.56,000/- deposited by the judgment debtor towards interest can be withdrawn by the decree holder-respondent. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE August 25, 2009. rka . . . 2