COCP No. 111 of 2009 -: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 111 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: October 13, 2009. Court on its motion ...Petitioner(s) v. Smt. Maninder Kaur Dhillon ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri N.C. Kinra, Advocate, amicus curiae. Shri Salil Sagar, Senior Advocate with Shri Sameer Sagar, Advocate for the respondent. Shri M.C. Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): The respondent is present in Court. During the course of arguments in CWP No.16662 of 2003 on 6.8.2008, this Court directed the respondent to produce record as mentioned in the aforesaid order. Despite various opportunities granted, the aforesaid record was not produced. Vide order dated 14.1.2009, this Court found that prima-facie the respondent had committed contempt of this Court by not producing the record as aforesaid and initiated suo-moto contempt proceedings against the respondent. In response to the show cause notice issued by this Court, reply by way of affidavit of the respondent was filed wherein the respondent has COCP No. 111 of 2009 -: 2 :- admitted the lapse on her part. However, the respondent has explained the reasons for committing the aforesaid mistake. Moreover, the respondent has also tendered unconditional apology with an undertaking that in future no such type of mistake would be committed and the deponent will remain very careful and duty bound. In view of the admission of lapse on the part of the respondent and the fact that she has tendered unconditional apology before this Court and has submitted an undertaking that in future she will remain careful and no lapse would be committed, I am not inclined to proceed further in this petition. Disposed of. Rule discharged. October 13, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge