IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16133 of 2009 1. AWADESH KUMAR S/O LATE YADU YADAV R/O VILL.- BANOOBAGICHA, POST- BANOOBAGICHA, P.S.- CHANAN, DISTT.- LAKHISARAI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DIRECTOR, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE JOINT SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 6. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, LAKHISARAI DISTT.- LAKHISARAI 7. THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, MUNGER DIVISION, MUNGER 8. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, LAKHISARAI DISTT.- LAKHISARAI 9. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, LAKHISARAI DISTT.- LAKHISARAI 10. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, CHANAN BLOCK, DISTT.- LAKHISARAI ----------- 03. 29.11.2010 Contending that the Block office was sought to be shifted contrary to the notification of the State Government fixing the earlier location, learned counsel finds it difficult to persuade this Court that otherwise these were State policy matters, best left to the Authorities themselves. Leave is sought to withdraw the application to pursue the matters before the State Government itself by filing a representation before the respondent no.2. Needless to state that, if the petitioner files any representation basing his claim on any State Government notification and that notification has not 2 been varied or modified in accordance with law, the State Government is expected to act in accordance with law. The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)