1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5601 OF 2009 (Gajanan Chintaman Kate vs. Dnyaneshwar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JANUARY 28, 2010. Heard Shri Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri S.S. Adkar, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and Mrs. Khade, learned AGP for respondent No.3. Shri Patil, learned counsel contends that the Education Officer has granted approval to fill in the post and finding about non availability of vacancy by the School Tribunal is unsustainable. Shri Adkar, learned counsel points out that the finding is of collusion between uncle of the petitioner (one of the trustees), Education Officer and Head Master. I have perused the impugned judgment. The finding recorded by the School Tribunal can be demonstrated to be perverse by referring to some other independent record. The petitioner has not produced any such record either before the School Tribunal or before this Court. 2 In view of this, it is not possible to interfere into the finding of fact. Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.