IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15293 of 2010 MITHU MANJHI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.5.2010. Heard. The petitioner is not named in the FIR of a case under Section 395 of the IPC and in spite of being in custody since 8.9.2009 has not been put on test identification. There is no recovery either from the petitioner’s possession. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing P.R. bond of Rs.500/-(five hundred)) without any surety to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in Paliganj P.S.Case No.94 of 2008. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )