ky y ^ t^ (;^)(S^A> ;r;/ 1 Ija^MAI^Yft P«A©ESM^^MiaT»T^ PtIN^P^t. .."B-BSICN-^T • 3»8^»W • '^ @R|&|Nm.Wp^eAnioNl^jQ:.fl:f^^<i0P!-i PETITIQNCR t Btiaiyalal Ahisiaai?, agcd 40 yeaa?a^ s©f)Qf fflr*,5 Paraadii Aliiryata Bl©ck ©«b clQpniBdt Offic®r,OBOl3h®Q^ Qistricfe - Raipur» SesiclBnt ef Block Coiony^ ©ttobheQ, Oisit.- Etaipyi*| -VERSVS- aESPOMOENTS$ I• Tha Siata Qf N«P»- throUQh ttr Saeretaryji l»ar»chayatand ayral QevelepfflBnfe Oapartmefit, 6evt|i of N»P»» Vallabh Bhava^ 8hopal| 2*' Th» Oii?®ctop»"PaiRchayal; & Bvral Oevelopo mant ©cpartmeRtJ Viiidbyachal BhauaR, Bhefaal* 3| Chiaf Ex»eutive 0fficM,s 0*«<0«A«, ©istrietBttiiral ©evslopmiiRt;A§»i'icy> Raipui?/ AcldiUoi-tal Colleetor^Raipyi?, OKTAtLS (T APPt.Ifmil^ fi^ HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 1341 of2005 Petitioner Bhaiyalal Ahirwar Versus Respondents State of M. E (now Chhattisgarh) & otiiers (SB: HonTsle Shri Satish K. Agiuliotri J.) None for fhe petitioner. Shri N. N. Roy aad Shri A, V. Shndhar, Paael Lawyers for the respondents/ State. 1. O RD E R (orall ( Passed on fhis 19th day ofNovember, 2009) The inatter is called for heanng twice. On bofb. the occasions none appears nor aay representation is inade on behalf of fhe petitioner. The petitioner may not be iaterested m prosecuting the niatter. In view of fhe foregoiiig, the petition is dismissed for waat of prosecution. A copy ofthis order shall be sent to the petitioner forfhwifh. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 2. Tumaae