1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR M. C. A. NO. 722 Of 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 3611 OF 2008. Sonabai Latari Bobade & Ors. Vs. Vitthal Karnu Bobade & Ors. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Anjan De Adv for appellants. Shri Amit Balpande Adv for respondents. CORAM: C. L. PANGARKAR J. DATED: 30 th SEPTEMBER, 2009. This application has been filed for review of the order passed by this Court on 20.10.2008 whereby an application for condonation of delay was rejected. The application came to be rejected because of the fact that two appeals were to be preferred and only one was preferred within time and the present one could not be presented within time. This Court had found that no sufficient 2 cause was shown because of the fact that if one appeal could be presented in time there was no reason why the other could not be. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that it was solely due to the mistake on the part of the counsel that appeal was not in fact presented within time and a litigant should not suffer for the default on the part of the counsel. After having considered the submission made by the learned counsel the order passed by this Court dated 20.10.2008 is recalled and delay in preferring the appeal stands condoned. JUDGE svk