1 crap3853.09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3853 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION ST. NO. 301 OF 2009 Rameshchanda s/o Shivnarayan Kasat ...Applicant (Original complainant) VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents (Nos. 2 to 5 orig. accused) ..... Shri B.V.Dhage, , advocate for applicant Shri B.V.Wagh, A.P.P. for respondent no.1 Shri R.A.Tambe, advocate for respondent nos. 2 to 5 ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 3rd August, 2011 PER COURT : 1 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 195 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Revision Application against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 3.12.2008, passed by the learned Judicial 2 crap3853.09 Magistrate, First Class, Court No.3, Sangamner, in Summary Tribal Case No. 1391 of 2001. 3 The learned A.P.P. for respondent no.1 and learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 to 5 opposed the application vehemently and submitted that the present application is without any substance and same is devoid of any merits and same be dismissed. 4 For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily and it further appears that the delay caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Revision Application is not willful, deliberate and intentional and same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 5 Hence, present Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 195 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Revision Application stands condoned and present Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE), JUDGE. dbm/crap3853.09