1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Third day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice S.PALANIVELU CRL OP(MD) No.11060 of 2011 R.MANI ALIAS MANIKANDAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.6 Vs STATE THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VEERAVANALLUR POLICE STATION AMBASAMUTHIRAM TALUK TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT CR.NO.219/2010 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.LAJAPATHI ROY Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.6 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, in Crime No.219 of 2010 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner apprehending arrest on the basis of the confession given by the second accused as if the petitioner is also involved in the Crime No.219 of 2010 for the offence under Section 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner is the sixth accused and he has got one previous case and the investigation is going on and hence he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioner's name does not find a place in the F.I.R and he was implicated in this case on the basis of the confession given by the second accused and also the co-accused were already released on bail and even though the petitioner was not arrested he neither interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned District https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi, on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi, and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 23/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, CHERANMAHADEVI. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VEERAVANALLUR POLICE STATION AMBASAMUTHIRAM TALUK TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. T.LAJAPATHI ROY Advocate SR. No.28770 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11060 of 2011 Date :23/08/2011 RJ/25.8.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/