IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.476 of 2003 Date of Decision 09.02.2010 An Kuri ...... Petitioner (s) VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...... Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: None for the petitioner. Mr.Rajiv Malhotra, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL): This is a revision petition, preferred by the petitioner- complainant, against the judgment dated 12.03.2001, passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Sirsa, acquitting the respondents-accused from the charges under Sections 120-B, 302/ 34 IPC. Impugned order has been perused. The evidence on the record appears to have been appreciated by the trial Court in the right perspective. The petitioner has been rightly given benefit of doubt. No other plausible view could be formed than what was observed by the trial Court. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 09.02.2010 mamta-II