Compromise App. 4863 / 09 In Second Appeal No. 35 of 2007 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Appellant Raja Ram, respondent No. 1 Smt. Sita Devi, respondent No. 2 Ghanshyam and respondent No. 3 Sonu are present in person before this Court along with their counsel. Mrs. Indu Sharma, Advocate present for the applicant / appellant. Mr. Vijay Bhatt, Advocate present for respondents No. 1 to 3. A compromise (Annexure –1 to the affidavit dated 13th of June 2009) is filed before this Court with Application No. 4863 of 2009, by the appellant and respondents No. 1 to 3. Learned counsel for the parties prayed that this appeal may be decided in terms of the compromise filed before this Court. The parties in person were identified by their counsel and the compromise was verified in the Court. Learned counsel for the appellant further states that respondent No. 4 Kanhaya has already died, and appeal is not pressed against respondent No. 5 Uma Shankar. It is pointed out that respondents No. 2 and 3, who were minor, have now become major. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this appeal is decided in terms of compromise (Annexure –1 to the affidavit dated 13th of June 2009) filed before this Court with Application No. 4863 of 2009. As against respondent No. 5, the appeal shall stand dismissed. The aforesaid compromise shall form part of the decree. (The Compromise Application No. 4863 of 2009 stands disposed of). (P.C. P., J.) 19.06.2009 HN