IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN WRIT PETITION No.22932 of 2011 Between: Ram Gopal Gupta and another. … Petitioners And The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Reptd., by the Commissioner, Municipal complex, Tankbund road, Hyderabad and others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri P.Sridhar Reddy. Counsel for the respondents: Sri C.Damodar Reddy for R.1 to R.4. None R5 for R6. This Court made the following: ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief:- “…to issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the inaction of the respondents 1 to 4 herein in considering the representations submitted by the petitioners herein including legal notice dated 30-10-10 caused by the petitioners to initiate action against the respondents 5 and 6 for raising unauthorized construction in the premises bearing No.3-6-313, Hyderguda, Hyderabad city contrary to the sanctioned plan as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of the provisions of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to forthwith initiate action under Section 461 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and the rules made thereunder and cause demolition of the illegal construction raised by respondents 5 & 6 violating the sanctioned plans”. At the hearing, Sri P.Sridhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel, WPMP Nos.28053 of 2011 is dismissed as infructuous. ------------------------------------- - C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:07-9-2011 MNR