IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16391 of 2007 NITU KUMARI, wife of Shri Tonendra Kumar Singh, resident of village Pachpaika, P.S. Ujiyarpur, District Samastipur … Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna 2. The Commissioner cum Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The Director of Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna 4. The District Magistrate, Samastipur 5. The District Welfare Officer, Samastipur 6. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Samastipur 7. The Child Development Project Officer, Block District Samastipur 8. Geeta Kumari, wife of Manoranjan Singh, resident of village Pach paika, P.S. Ujiyarpur, District Samastipur 9. Soni Kumari, wife of Tek Narayan Singh, resident of village Pachpaika, P.S. Ujiyarpur, District Samastipur 10. Nirmala Kumari, wife of Lilendra Kumar 11. Punita Kumari, wife of Subodh Singh 12. Babita Kumari, wife of Anil Kumar Baitha 13. Asmira Kumari, wife of Shri Amrendra Kumar Singh, serial no. 9 to 13 are resident of village Pachpaika, P.S. Ujiyarpur, District Samastipur 14. Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Raj, Chandchaur, Karihara, village Pachpaika, P.S. Ujiyarpur, District Samastipur 15. The Secretary of Gram Panchayat Raj, Chandchaur Karihara, village Pachpaika, P.S. Ujiyarpur, District Samastipur … Respondents. ----------- 2. 18.12.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows: “This writ application has been filed for issuance of an appropriate writ or writs, direction or directions, order or orders in the nature of certiorari 2 for quashing the selection of Anganbari Sewika Geeta Kumari for Feeding Centre No.2 village Pachpaika under the Gram Panchayat Raj, Chandchaur Karihara, village Pachpaika, Block Ujiyarpur, District Samastipur.” With reference to the aforementioned relief, counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner intends to move the Collector of the District by filing a compact representation. In the opinion of this Court, recourse chosen by the petitioner seems to be correct inasmuch as the scheme for appointment on the post of Anganbari Sevika itself envisages the redressal of grievance pertaining to selection/ appointment on the post of Anganbari Sevika in the first instance by the Collector of the District. That being so, this Court would give liberty to the petitioner to file a compact representation which, if filed alongwith this order, will be disposed of within the time limit fixed by the State Government in the circular dated 10.12.2009 by a reasoned order after affording 3 opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, respondent nos.8 to 13 and the representative of concerned Gram Panchayat. With the aforementioned observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/