IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 3879 of 2005 Between: Smt. Kethavath Savitha, W/o. Sukku Naik, R/o. Yelmala Mada Village, Chandempet Mandal, Nalgonda district. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 2 The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 3 The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Chandempet Mandal, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 3rd respondent in not sending proposals of the resolution dated 7-5-2004 and consequently to ratify the same by the 2nd respondent, as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutuional and pass such ofurther order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deemf fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM Writ Petition No. 3879 of 2005 Oral Order: Sri Vivek Chandrasekhar, learned counsel, representing Sri S. Niranjan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J. Date: 10.02.2009 Nsr