IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-15051 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.7.2011 Darshana Devi ..Petitioner. Vs. State of Punjab ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present : Mr. Arshdeep Singh Sivia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Rajesh Bindal, J. The petitioner in the present case is mother-in-law of the complainant. She is one of the accused in FIR No.57 dated 24.4.2011 registered on the statement of Tamana alias Chinnu under Sections 498- A/406/323/34 IPC. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that husband of the complainant, his sister and brother-in-law (sister's husband) were arrested and have already been released on regular bail. He further submitted that the petitioner has already joined investigation. The facts stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not disputed by the learned counsel for the State, however, he submitted that certain jewellery items are yet to be recovered. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts stated by them, in my opinion, merely for recovery of some jewellery, the petitioner cannot be put in custody as at present it cannot be finally opined as to how much jewellery was given in dowry and in whose possession the same is. In view of the aforesaid facts, interim bail granted to the petitioner on 17.5.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. ( Rajesh Bindal ) 29.7.2011 Judge Meenu