IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5130 of 2011 PROF.YUGAL KISHOR MISHRA, Retired as Reader from C.M.B. College, Deorh, Ghoghardiha, S/o Chun Chun Mishra, R/o Mohalla – Sijoulia, P.O.- Ghoghardiha, District – Madhubani under L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga. ......... Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Vice-Chancellor, L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga. 3. The Registrar, L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga. 4. The Finance Officer, L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga. ........... Respondents ----------- 2 18.03.2011 Heard Sri Ratan Kumar Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Prabhu Narayan Sharma, learned A.C. to Advocate General, appearing on behalf of respondent no. 1, and Smt. Shail Kumari Jha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 2, 3 & 4/ Lalit Narayan Mithila University. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 31.5.2005, as Reader, Department of History, from C.M.B. College, Deorh, Ghoghardiha under Lalit Narayan Mithila University, has prayed for directing the respondents to make payment of his retiral dues in revised scale, arrear of earned leave of 64 days and other dues. Sri Ratan Kumar Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that this writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file representation before respondent no. 2/Vice-Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Darbhanga. Learned counsel for the University has got no objection. The petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate representation before respondent no. 2/Vice-Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Darbhanga, 2 within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, the respondent no. 2, is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order, in accordance with law, redressing the grievances of the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no. 2, considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he may pass an order for clearing the dues within the aforesaid time. The petitioner shall also be entitled to get admissible statutory interest for delayed payment. In case of refusal, respondent no. 2, is directed to pass speaking order within the aforesaid time. With above observation and direction the petition stands disposed of. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)