IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 30TH JANUARY 2009 / 10TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 1768 of 2009(I) ------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- M.T.SURESH KUMAR, MUNDAPLAKKAL, CHERUPUZHA POST, KAKKAYCHAL, PADATHADAM, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SREEPRAKASH K.NAIR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE SYNDICATE BANK, CHERUPUZHA BRANCH REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. 2. THE SYNDICATE BANK, REPRESENTED BY ITS ZONAL MANAGER, KANNUR. ADV. SRI.R.S.KALKURA FOR R1,2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- W.P.C. NO. 1768 OF 2009 I -------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th January, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner was conducting a small scale unit. Case of the petitioner is that he had availed a loan of Rs.75,000/= under the PMRY and he remitted Rs.10,000/= to the respondent Bank. It is stated that the property of the petitioner was sold and even now the respondents are harassing the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Bank, on the other hand, points out that the case of the petitioner that the property was auctioned is completely incorrect. The property has not been auctioned and he also submits that even Ext.P2 representation has not been received. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will make a representation. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to represent his grievances before the respondents. Sd/= kbk. K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE // True Copy // PS to Judge