IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36946 of 2008 Guddu Gaur @ Guddu Kumar Gaur, son of Petu Gaur, village Gaura, PS Sahpur, Dist. Bhojpur – Petitioner. Versus State Of Bihar 2 15.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed for quashing the order, dated 9.7.2007 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur in Jagdishpur PS Case No. 158/2005 by which cognizance has been taken for the offences under sections 366A/34 of the Penal Code. The facts are that one Surendra Kumar alias Surendra Gode had supposedly ran away and kidnapped Punam Kumari. The trial of Surendra Kumar commenced and by judgment, dated 18.12.2006 passed in S.T. No. 467/2006 by the Additional Sessions Judge, FTC, Bhojpur has come to the finding that both Surendra Kumar and Punam Kumari are happily married. The families have no complaint against each other and that no case is made out under section 366A of the Penal Code. The present petitioner is supposed to have abated the kidnapping of Punam Kumari. Since the main person has been acquitted in this case, this court finds no reason that this petitioner should be put to rigorous of trial. The order, dated 9.7.2007 is hereby quashed and this application is allowed. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)