Crl.M.No.M-3288 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-3288 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 18, 2010 Kamal Singh and others .....Petitioners v. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.R.S.Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms.Bhavna Gupta, DAG, Punjab. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of regular bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.31, dated 25.5.2009, under Sections 307, 323, 332, 353, 186, 148, 149 IPC, registered at Police Station Bhadaur, District Barnala. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that only simple injuries have been attributed to the petitioners. Further contends that petitioners have been continuing in custody since 25.5.2009. Further contends that trial is not likely to be concluded in near future as only six witnesses out of 17 have been examined so far. Further contends that co-accused Amarjit Kaur and Harbans Singh have already been granted regular bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Crl.M.No.M-25165 of 2009, vide order dated 25.11.2009. These facts have not been disputed by learned State counsel. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Trial is not likely to be concluded in near future. Hence, in Crl.M.No.M-3288 of 2010 (O&M) -2- view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioners-Kamal Singh, Gurpreet Singh and Sukhvinder Singh, for grant of regular bail is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Barnala. 18.8.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge