^ ^? ^^^ tll BEN W: THB liTGH^ 'aOU^_©P_JU£a:%OTJSB.^: ^fc.iSHjN' '{ac. )^!: *(»»W^»S<l >a».»»a<W<9t»»rtRtt<rt»^(to-<l»<WiH».w»»x^^ *Bn»Bn'?IIM*i»!l,..»*<l(!Wa CT<ii^»WAs^.»»cNMa»»-*^^ IBTTTTCMS^S' \^ ^9' .•''I ^M ^t^ ....>^(^v' ^y ^' aSSPONHSNTS ^^p^^^lr l2£^CT2S2w»lilJ^2^^^©ili 1»; ®itar<8pftGrdfclahare ^m ef SMrl .|^.martam GrAflahare residsat ©f ^anaraab®®Etest-Arjtini •v3.a ^altara mstrict <3'5pjllr~Chanpa. (C«G,)« , 2» Panctarara Mar&al ^n ©f M Baha^ar Marbal resiQsit ©fvillg©e 'DeverA p©^KataaA Ma Ta.hgi.i ^aitara % ^t^ J aaj gi. rw Cb^wa CG*G.)^ ^.'3<. ant«. SteNaa Slagh Chs^del Dda^ter of Shri ssiaat :31n©hCi.i^iael R/c? Math M^<3Ar, Old BastA ^altara. Ed.stfc.O'^jgir" Cfes^ipa. (C»G,). . ^SI. 1.^ Sfcate of CfahattAsciarh T3an®aghs Secretary ^ Scteo1 - SdAaat l^n De^elo t. y D<K^S^^^^. Rai.par <C»G.)» 2«. Dlstricfc E^iGatAoR O fj3.c@r y j^j gj, r-Cbampa (C.G.)<, 3^ Mc»<3c:B^icati©nOfficer ^. %©cK:J eiaj'gi r-Chempa Eft Stt *J glj @ir- Ctaampa ( OG), f^/itr .@£2^LMSa^S£3kB^^.CX>21^Q^SSy£Z^i J^..!^^. The T^tlfclot'iers named aN?>v^^: i^usst NimMy ^xa respect&ily t^ to aiaal.t a^ uBSAer t^ u HIGH COURT OF'CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETiTiON (S') N0.1000 OF.2010 PETJTSONERS RE^SPGNDENTS- Sitaram Gritlahare & Others Versus •State-of'Chhattssgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shri'Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri'JA. Lohani, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri A.V. Sridhar; Panel Lawyer.forthe State. 1) 2) 4) 'c ORDERrORAO . . (Passed on this 9th day of March, 2010) With the consent of tearned counset appearing for the partles, the petition is heard finaiiy. . • ' , ! • ' Learned counsel appearing for the ^petitioners, on instructions, submlts that the petiticners do not want to cont^st this petition on merits atthisstage, and prays for withdrawal of this petitiors with liberty to make indivjdual representations in:: the Slght of the cireulardated 27.12.2008: ' : Learned • counsel appe.aring for.the State: submlts that if the. representations' are made, thesame shali. be-considersd and declded within a period of three weeRs from the date of receipt of.the representatlons, in the light of the above stated circutar,' •a:s weli as the order dated 20.01.2009 passed by this Court in W.P.(S): Ho. 6128/2007 (Jagsnnath Ram v. The Stste of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected matters. In vlew of foregoing, the writ petltion is dismissed as withdrawn with the above-stated iiberty. !t is expected that the coneerned authorities would consider and declde the representations, 'sf any; a.s above. within a period ofthree weeks from the date'of receipt ofthe representations aiong with a copy of ttlis'order. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge