1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4494 OF 1993 Ramesh Govind Waghmare & ors. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. Respondents With Civil Writ Petition No.4929 of 1993 Shrimant Sidramaappa Ganga & ors. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. Respondents With Civil Writ Petition No.2807 of 1994 Shri Sadashiv Dada Padole & ors. Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & ors. Respondents With Civil Writ Petition No.4740 of 1993 Bharat Sadashiv Awate & ors. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. Respondents With Civil Writ Petition No.5014 of 1993 Shankar Dinanath Vedpathak & ors. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. With Civil Writ Petition No.5015 of 1993 Sarang Dattatraya Mane & ors. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. Respondents Mr.A.R.Pitale with Mr.P.M. Pradhan for petitioners in W.P.Nos.4494/93, 4929/93 and 4740/93. Mr.Ameya Tamhane with Ms.Seema Sarnaik and Ms.Bhavana Jadhav for petitioners in W.P. Nos. 5014/93 and 5015/93. 2 Mr.Vinay Bhate h/f Mr.P.P.Chavan in W.P.2807/94. Mr.Y.D.Mulani, AGP for Resp.No.1 in all petitions. Mr.Nitin Jamdar for Resp.Nos.2 and 3 in all petitions. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. March 07, 2006. P.C. . In view of the policy framed by the Government of Maharashtra and approved by the Apex Court (as per the G.R. dated 5th December 1995), the Government of Maharashtra implemented the scheme for absorption of Muster Assistants in various Departments. The order passed by this Court on 13/9/1994 in Writ Petition No.4494 of 1993 also envisaged such a policy to be framed for regularisation of the services of the Muster Assistants. We have no doubt that the petitioners were covered by the G.R. dated 5/12/1995 in asmuchas they were in the employment on the cut off date. . The Government has also taken steps pursuant to the said policy for absorption of the Muster Assistants and on the fact that none of the petitioners have subsequently come before this Court by filing any Civil Application raising a grievance 3 that pursuant to the said scheme any of them was not absorbed. . With the passage of time and on account of the policy already implemented by the Government of Maharashtra, these petitions do not survive any further. The same are hereby disposed as infructuous. Rule discharged. . We make it clear that if any of the petitioners has not been absorbed pursuant to the said policy, he/she may approach before the appropriate forum for redressal. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)