[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.2324 OF 2008 IN SESSIONS CASE NOS. 678 OF 2007 @ 249 OF 2007 @ 916 OF 2007 Ganpat Bapu Salunkhe ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Vishal Ingawale Advocate for Applicant Mr.K.V.Saste APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 23, 2008 DATE : JULY 23, 2008 DATE : JULY 23, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in CR No.63 of 2005 of EOW, Mumbai (now EOW CR No.26 of 2005). The said case is under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC. 3. The prosecution case is that the applicant is a builder and he has sold flats to various persons. The further case of the prosecution is that one [-2-] flat has been sold to more than one person. The material on record shows that the applicant has sold flat No.G-1 to four persons, flat no.B-302 to three persons, flat No.B-202 to four persons, flat No.B-203 to four persons, flat No.A-203 to three persons, flat No.B-103 to four persons and flat No.A-103 to two persons. The said flats are in the building known as Proposed Vikrant Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. 4. Looking to the material on record, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant bail. 5. Application is rejected and is disposed of accordingly. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]