IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2011/30TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 LAA.No. 730 of 2010 (B) ---------------------- LAR.125/99 OF SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA ---------------------- APPELLANT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT ---------------------------------- 1 N.T.P.C.LTD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER (HR) KAYAMKULAM. BY ADV.SRI.M.A.SHAFIK RESPONDENT(S)/CLAIAMNTS/1ST RESPONDENT --------------------------------------------------- 1 SRI.KOCHUKUNJU, CHIRAMEL VEETTIL, PALLIPPAD SOUTH MURI PALLIPPAD VILLAGE ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2 SMT.THRESSIA KOCHUKUNJU, CHIRAMEL VEETTIL PALLIPPAD SOUTH MURI PALLIPPAD VILLAGE ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 3 STATE OF KERALA-REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR ALAPPUZHA(SPECIAL TAHSILDAR LA) NO.111 S.T.P.S HARIPAD(IST RESPONDENT IN THE LAR) SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SHYAMKUMAR THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-12-2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & K. HARILAL, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ L. A. A. No.730 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 21st day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose It is very fairly brought to our notice by Sri.M.Shafik, the learned counsel for the appellant/Requisitioning Authority that the State appeal preferred against the very same award was dismissed by this Court on merits. Under the above circumstances, we are of the view that presently this appeal is not maintainable in law. We reject this appeal and direct the Registry to refund the full court fee paid on the appeal memorandum to the learned counsel for the appellant. Sd/- PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE Sd/- K. HARILAL JUDGE kns/- //True Copy// P. A. TO JUDGE -2-