THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P. No. 410 of 2011 Dated. 04–03-2011 Between: Mohammad Pasha …Petitioner Vs. Surabathula Nageswara Rao (died) per L.Rs. Smt. Surabathula Venkayamma and others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P.No. 410 of 2011 ORAL ORDER: This revision under Section 22 of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 (for short ‘the Act’) is filed against the concurrent findings of the learned Rent Controller-cum-Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada allowing R.C.No. 38 of 2006 by the order dated 01-12-2009 and affirmed by the learned Rent Appellate Controller-cum-II Additional Senior Civil Judge, (FAC, Principal Senior Civil Judge), Kakinada, by the order dated 15-12-2010, rejecting R.C.A.No. 2 of 2010 filed by the revision petitioner. The 1st respondent herein is admittedly the owner of the building bearing door No. 65-3-14, Mehar Nagar, Kakinada. The revision petitioner is a tenant of the schedule property. There was admittedly no written lease deed between the parties and the lease is pleaded to be an oral lease. R.C.No. 38 of 2006 was filed seeking eviction of the revision petitioner on the ground of willful default in payment of the rents. The Courts below concurrently found, on a cogent and careful consideration of the evidence on record that the revision petitioner had willfully committed default in the deposit of rents and accordingly the primary tribunal allowed the rent control case and that order was confirmed by the appellate Court. This Court discerns no error either in the appreciation of law or exercise of discretion by the Courts below, warranting interference in the revision. The revision has no merits. Accordingly the revision petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. No costs. __________________________ JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM Dated: 04-03-2011 Pvks/*