Cv^ ^^i^- F RFN' ft.v >.-- • ^" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.l W,P, (S)No3°^> / 2011 PETITIONER .^ ..--•C^J .\^-^..-- _^ •«>• ^o- .->$•"y ..<v y'' •••'•,. ^ .-><A A^ y*-' RESPONDENTS 2. 3. 4. Padinawati Patel D/o Shri Dhruw Kuraar Patel Aged about 21 years, R/o Villate - Resora Tahsi- Baramkela, Janpad - Baramkela, Distt. Raigarh (CG) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Panchayat & Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt. Raipur (CG) Collector, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) Chief Executive Officer, Janpat Panchayat, Baramkela Distt. Raigarh (CG) Block Education Officer Baramkela Distt. Raigarh (CG) 2r WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner above named, respectfully begs to submit as under:- 1. PARTJCULARS QF THE PETITIONERfS) : As shown in the cause title. w 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENT(S) : shown in the cause title. PARTICULARS OF THE CAUSE/ORDER AGAINSTLJVHICH THE PETITION IS MADE: . The petitioner through this petition intends challenge the illegality and arbitraiy action of the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHA1TISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRTT PETmON (S) No. 903 of2011 Padmawati Patel. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETfTIUN IMDER A&TICLE 226 OF THE CONSTn-UIION OF BMDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. Present: Shri N.K.Chatterjee, Advocate on behalfofSmt. Sudha Agrawal, Advocste forthe petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel lawyer forthe State/respondents. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 14 day of February, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has appeared in the recruitmeirt process for the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade III, iu Janpad Panchayat, Baramkela. She was placed at serial No. 15 in the combined merit list for female candidates and at serial No. 13 in the merit list of female OBC category. According to the petitioner, she is in the waiting list, however, the posts of Shiksha Kanni Grade HI in Janpad Panchayat, Baramkela are being fiUed up by transfer and tfae merit list is not exhausted. 2. Qn perosal ofthe Armexjre P/4, which is under challenge in Ifais petition, it would appear that the said documeirt is only a list of Shiksha Karmi Grade III (Arts) who have been tratisferred from other blocks to Janpad Panchayat, Baramkela. This document is not a letter ofappoiirtment ofthe enlisted candidates by transfer fi-om Janpad Panchayat. It appears that these transfers have been made from Janpad Paichayat as an incidence of service. 3. In view ofthe above, fhere is no merit in this petition. However, ifthe petitioner feels that posts are lying vacant in Janpad Panchayat, Baramkela, she may submit a representation before the concemed authority wilhin a period ofthree weeks from today and in such event, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance wilh law within a farther period ofeight weeks. 4. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the vwit petition is disposed of. Sd//- , -- Prashant Kumar Mishra <^nQ^ ^ Judge