.{1}. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION [1] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.185 OF 2008 [1] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.185 OF 2008 [1] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.185 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.1705 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1705 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1705 OF 2007 Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Sena. ..Petitioner. Versus The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Districts and 2 others. ..Respondents. ... Ms.R.Todankar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.M.S. Topkar, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr.H.Rehman, Advocate i/b. D.H. Law Asso. for respondent No.2. ... WITH WITH WITH [2] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.186 OF 2008 [2] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.186 OF 2008 [2] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.186 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.1844 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1844 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1844 OF 2007 Arvind Balkrishna Birvatkar. ..Petitioner. Versus The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Districts and 2 others. ..Respondents. ... Ms.Ranjana Todankar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.M.S. Topkar, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms.S.I. Shah, Advocate for respondent No.2. ... WITH WITH WITH [3] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.187 OF 2008 [3] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.187 OF 2008 [3] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.187 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.1850 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1850 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1850 OF 2007 Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi. ..Petitioner. Versus Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Districts and 2 others. ..Respondents. ... Ms.Ranjana Todankar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.M.S. Topkar, Advocate for respondent No.1. ... .{2}. WITH WITH WITH [4] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.188 OF 2008 [4] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.188 OF 2008 [4] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.188 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.1854 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1854 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1854 OF 2007 Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Union. ..Petitioner. Versus Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Districts and 2 others. ..Respondents. ... Ms.Vaishali Bhilare, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.M.S.Topkar, Advocate for respondent No.1. ... WITH WITH WITH [5] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.189 OF 2008 [5] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.189 OF 2008 [5] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.189 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.1865 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1865 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1865 OF 2007 Sadanand Vithoba Matvandkar and 6 others. ..Petitioners. Versus The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Districts and 2 others. ..Respondents. ... Ms.Ranjana Todankar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.M.S. Topkar, Advocate for respondent No.1. ... WITH WITH WITH [6] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.190 OF 2008 [6] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.190 OF 2008 [6] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.190 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.2440 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.2440 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.2440 OF 2007 Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Sena. ..Petitioner. Versus The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Districts and 2 others. ..Respondents. ... Ms.Ranjana Todankar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.M.S. Topkar, Advocate for respondent No.1. ... WITH WITH WITH [7] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.191 OF 2008 [7] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.191 OF 2008 [7] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.191 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.2354 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.2354 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.2354 OF 2007 .{3}. Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Sena. ..Petitioner. Versus The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Districts and 2 others. ..Respondents. ... Ms.Ranjana Todankar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.M.S. Topkar, Advocate for respondent No.1. ... WITH WITH WITH [8] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.192 OF 2008 [8] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.192 OF 2008 [8] NOTICE OF MOTION NO.192 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.2181 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.2181 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.2181 OF 2007 Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Mahasangh. ..Petitioner. Versus The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Districts and 2 others. ..Respondents. ... Ms.Ranjana Todankar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.M.S. Topkar, Advocate for respondent No.1. ... CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : 2ND MARCH, 2009. DATED : 2ND MARCH, 2009. DATED : 2ND MARCH, 2009. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. As time as sought has already expired, all the notice of motions have become infructuous, hence dismissed as infructuous. [J.N.PATEL,J.] [J.N.PATEL,J.] [J.N.PATEL,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]