1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8630 OF 2010 Shantaram (Raju) s/o Daulat Sonwane .. PETITIONER VERSUS Bhagwat s/o Ramdas Chaudhari (Teli) .. RESPONDENT Mr. D.R. Irale Patil, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, advocate for the respondent. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 23 rd SEPTEMBER, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Petitioner is raising exception to the concurrent order passed by the courts below in respect of grant of temporary injunction. Trial court has restrained the defendant from causing interference in the user of the disputed well of the plaintiff. Order passed by the trial court has been confirmed by the first appellate court dealing with Misc. Civil Appeal no. 139/2000. Findings based on appreciation of evidence and the conclusion arrived at need not be interfered with in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition is devoid of substance hence stands rejected. 2 2 Considering the nature of the dispute, trial court is directed to expeditiously decide the pending suit preferably by the end of April, 2011. 3 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp8630.10.odt