IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 5TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 16TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 33414 of 2007(C) ------------------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------------- 1. JISHNU S.PRASAD,S/O.A.S.R.PRASAD, AGED 27,RESIDING AT JAYA BHAVAN,MANGAD LANE, KARAMANA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. BREEZ MATHEW,S/O.A.M.MATHEW, AGED 26,RESIDING AT ALUMMOOTTIL HOUSE, THRIKUDITHANAM,CHANGANASSERI. 3. MANJU RANI THAMPY,D/O.K.K.JANARDHANAN, AGED 27,RESIDING AT KUMARAMANGALAM,POTHENPURAM P.O,PAMPADY,KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.AYYAPPAN SANKAR SRI.G.SURARSHAN SRI.M.ZIYAD SRI.M.M.RAJNEESH RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,PRIYADARSHINI HILLS P.O,KOTTAYAM. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR,MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,PRIYADARSHINI HILLS P.O,KOTTAYAM. 3. THE PRO-VICE CHANCELLOR,MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,PRIYADARSHINI HILLS P.O,KOTTAYAM. 4. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,PRIYADARSHINI HILLS P.O,KOTTAYAM. 5. THE REGISTRAR,MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY PRIYADARSHINI HILLS P.O,KOTTAYAM. 6. THE HEAD OF DEPARTMENT,DEPARTMENT OF PHYSIOTHERAPY & REHABILITATION,SCHOOL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION,MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. BY SC FOR UNIVERSITY SRI. T.A. SHAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ========================= WRIT PETITION NO. 33414 OF 2007 ========================= Dated this the 5th day of February 2008 JUDGMENT This writ petition has filed alleging irregularity in valuation of answer papers of the Master of Physiotherapy. The petitioners had represented this matter to the University and those representations were directed to be considered by Ext.P7 judgment. Thereafter the representations were rejected and the said decision was communicated to them by Ext.P8. It is in this context, this writ petition was filed. 2. Standing Counsel for the University submits that the matter was decided to be reconsidered by order dated 4.12.2007. He also stated that it has been resolved on 24.1.2008 to call the petitioners for personal hearing. In view of this, I feel that the University has substantially redressed the grievance of the petitioners and therefore I close this writ petition recording the aforesaid submissions. In case the ultimate decision taken is prejudicial to the petitioners, it will be open to them to move this court, if they are so advised. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE css/