Civil Revision No.6586 of 2010 #1# IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.6586 of 2010 Date of Decision:-01.08.2011 Om Parkash. ......Petitioner. Versus Subash Chander. ......Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH. Present:- Mr. R.S. Chauhan, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Ashok Khunger, Advocate for the Respondent. *** JASWANT SINGH, J.(ORAL) Judgment Debtor/petitioner has approached this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution against the order dated 26.08.2010(P-6) whereby the learned Executing Court while adjourning the proceedings sin- a-die, in respect of an ex-parte decree in a suit for recovery, till the disposal of the application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC has directed the petitioner/JD to furnish a bank guarantee to the tune of Rs.1.5 lac in favour of the respondent/decree holder as security. It was submitted that the valuable land of the JD already stands attached and thus the direction for furnishing of bank guarantee is extremely harsh. It is submitted that the JD/petitioner is willing to furnish his personal bond by way of security qua the decretal amount. Civil Revision No.6586 of 2010 #2# Learned Counsel for the respondent/decree holder very fairly concedes that the respondent/decree holder would be satisfied if the petitioner/JD furnishes his personal bond qua the decretal amount, however, he prays that the learned trial Court be directed to expedite the conclusion of the proceedings on the application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC . Learned Counsel for the petitioner/JD has no objection to the aforesaid proposal of the respondent/decree holder. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and the agreed stand, though there is no illegality in the order passed by the learned Executing Court, however, keeping in view the interest of farmer, this revision petition is disposed of with the observation that the order dated dated 26.08.2010 would stand modified to the extent that the condition of bank guarantee shall stand deleted and in place the petitioner/JD would submit his personal bond qua the decretal amount by way of security within four weeks from today. The trial Court shall make endeavour to dispose of the application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC expeditiously. Both the parties undertakes to cooperate in the proceedings. With above observations, petition stands disposed of. ( JASWANT SINGH ) JUDGE August 01, 2011 Vinay