IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.2648 of 2008(O & M) Date of Decision:09.03.2010 Jatinder Bir Singh .... appellant Versus Nandlal .....respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.V.K.Kaushal,Advocate for Mr.B.R.Mahajan, Advocate for the appellant **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL): Vide order dated 05.02.2010, respondent No.1 was directed to be served by way of dasti process only. It was further ordered that in case respondent No.1 is not served, appeal qua him shall be deemed to be dismissed for non-prosecution. As per office report, counsel for the appellant has not collected dasti notices for effecting service upon respondent No.1. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant states that despite communication, appellant has not come to collect dasti notices and therefore he was unable to serve respondent No.1. Respondent No.2 is proforma respondent. In these circumstances, in view of my order dated 05.02.2010, no further order is required to be passed and the appeal is deemed to be dismissed. Ordered accordingly. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 09.03.2010 neenu