- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.688 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO.11 OF 2003 ... Suresh Devji More ...Plaintiff v/s. Vinod K. Gupta ...Defendant ... Mr.A.G. Revankar for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 10TH FEBRUARY,2005 - 2 - P.C.: The learned Counsel appearing for the Plaintiff states that the Defendant has been served. He has filed affidavit of service. None appears for the Defendant. There is no affidavit in reply filed. Heard the learned Counsel for the Plaintiff. Perused the record. Perused the order dated 7th April, 2004 and the order dated 20th April, 2004 passed in the Notice of Motion. In the absence of any affidavit in reply accepting the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the Notice of Motion at their face value, ad-interim order dated 7th April, 2004 is confirmed. Notice of Motion disposed of. ...