IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 24359 of 2006 Between: K. Jagannadha Rao, s/o. Lakshmi Narayana, Udyoganagar Colony, Punjagutta, Hyderabad - 500 082. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Karnataka State Financial Corporation, (Established Under the State Financial Corporations Act, B. Bagewadi Road, Bijapur, Karnataka State, Rep by its Branch Manager 2 Shivakumar, S/o. Not known to the petitioner, Karnataka State Financial Corporation, Near Ibrahimpur Railway Gate, B. Bagewadi Road, Bijapur, Karnataka State 3 Ashok Patel, S/o. Not known to the petitioner, Karnataka State Financial Corporation, Near Ibrahimpur Railway Gate, B. Bagewadi Road, Bijapur, Karnataka State .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not accepting the highest bid of the petitioner in respect of plot under sale bearing No. 9/A in Sy.No. 170 of Kothapet Village, Uppal Mandal, L.B. Nagar Municipality, R.R. District, Hyderabad in pursuant to the Notification dated 14-9-2006 of the 1st respondent and intaking steps in conducting open auction permitting the Respondents No. 2 and 3 in collusion with them to play fraud against all other bidders justice and consequentially to direct the 1st respondent to consider the highest bid of the petitioner in respect of plot No. 9/A notified by the 1st respondent and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.V.MAHESH Counsel for the Respondents: MR.K.MANIKYALA RAO The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO :24359 of 2006 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission accorded. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J DATE: 30th July, 2008 pnb