Crl.M.No.M-31120 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-31120 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:October 28, 2010 Rameshwari and another .....Petitioners v. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Ashok Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.55555 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-31120 of 2010 The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.277, dated 16.6.2010, under Sections 420, 404, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Hisar. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and have gone through the whole record carefully, including the impugned order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hisar, vide which application filed on behalf of the present petitioners for anticipatory bail was dismissed. Brief allegations against the petitioners-accused are that original owners of land in dispute namely, Harak Chand, Ghanshyam Dass and Gugan Chand had already expired and, however, sale deed nos.6702 and 6703 dated 6.10.2008 of the land belonging to them were executed in favour of petitioner no.1 in connivance with petitioner no.2 by impersonation, i.e., by producing some other persons as real owners. It is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners-accused. Rather their custodial Crl.M.No.M-31120 of 2010 (O&M) -2- interrogation is necessary. Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioners- Rameshwari and Surinder Kumar for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 28.10.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge