IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1161 of 2009 UMADHAR PRASAD SINGH son of late Bilat Prasad Singh, resident of Mohalla Moulaganj, Darbhanga, P.S. and Distt.-Darbhanga, the President of Ashok Paper Mills Kamgar Union Rameshwar Nagar Darbhanga------------------------------------------------------------Appellant. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA through the Secretary Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, New Delhi 2. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Labour and Employment and Training, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, 4. The Secretary, Department of Industries, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, 5. The Deputy Secretary, Department of Labout and Employment and Training, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 6. The Labour Commissioner, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 7. M/s Nouveau Capital and Finance Ltd. through its Chairman, 113 Mittal Chamber, 11th Floor, Nariman Point, Mumbai, Pin Code-400021 8. The Chairman, M/s Nouveau Capital and Finance Ltd., 113 Mittal Chamber, 11th Floor, Nariman Point, Mumbai, Pin Code-400021-----------------------------------------Respondents. ----------- 4. 5.1.2011 The present Letters Patent Appeal arises out of an order dated 4.8.2009 passed in C.W.J.C. no.9083 of 2009 wherein the appellant herein has sought relief for payment of salary and wages in terms and conditions of the order dated 8.11.2007 passed in case no.1 of 2007. However, learned single Judge has declined to interfere in the matter stating that the case is not fit for consideration. Learned single Judge has further observed that the appellant may take steps for enforcement of the award or action thereof against the Management. Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that in view of the fact that respondent nos.7 and 8 have not appeared in the labour court, it is very difficult for the appellant to make out money from them. As such, a direction be issued to the Government to implement the award. 2 However, in view of the fact that the appellant can avail the remedies open to him under the law, we are of the opinion that the learned single Judge is right in declining to interfere in the matter. However, liberty is granted to the appellant to move before the appropriate forum for enforcement of such award. With the aforesaid observation/direction this Letters Patent Appeal is disposed of. Sudip ( T. Meena Kumari, J.) ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. )