’ SINGLE BENCH; HON'BLE JUSTICE DHIRENDRA MI5HRA W.P. [c] NO.241/2008 1. Kuldeep Vadav, S/o Naresh Singh Yadav, aged abou‘r 22 years, R/o. Nagar' Pn‘rali, Hanuman Hazim, Gwalior (M.P.). PEFITIONas 2. Alka Sherma, D/o Rajendm Kumar' Sharma, W/o. Kuideep Vadav, aged abou1' 22 years, R/o. Rqjendra Prasad Colony, Gwalior (M.P.). Both presently residing a‘r Darri Para. Ambikapur, Disfr. Surguja (Chhaffisgarh) Vs RESPONDENTS 1. 51*afe of Chha‘rrisgarh, Through: Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Manfralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, vRaipur (C.6.) 2. Inspecfor General of Police, Surguja - Range, at Ambikapur, Districf Surguja (6.6.) 3. Superimendenf of Police, DisfricT Surguja (6.6.) 4. Station House Officer, Police 5mm Ambikapur (Sadar), 5urguja (6.6.) 5. Rajendra Kumar Sharma, R/o Rqjendra Prasad Colony, Gwalior (M.P.O STa‘ie of Madhya Pradesh, Through: Secretary, Home Affair, Vallabh Bhowan, Bhopal (M.P.) 7. Superinfendenf of Police, Gwalior (Madhya Pradesh) Present: Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Wankhode, Advoca‘ie for fhe pe'ri'rioners. Mr. Pankaj Shrivas'rava, Panel Lawyer for The Sfafe. O R A L O R D E R (Passed on 14.3.2008) Per Dhirendra Mishra J‘ 1. Heard. 2. By fhis pe‘rifion under Ar‘ricle 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioners, who have contracted inter-caste marriage and are apprehending threat and act of violence from respondent No.5, are seeking direction for police protection from the respondents. . Learhed counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are originally residents of Gwalior (M.P.) and they are presently resiirggt . Ambikapur, as The pefi‘rioner No.1 is working as ‘Computer Opera'ror' in 6.6. Road Secfor Development Project Ambikapur. If is sfa‘red Thaf respondent No.5, fa‘i'her of pefi'rioner No.2, is unhappy wiTh The infer- cosi'e marriage and he is issuing 'threafs To The peTiTioner-s Through Telephone ThaT They have Traced Their whereabou‘rs and They shall geT Them eliminaTed Through Their- persons on The place where They are residing. The peTiTioners had iodged a complainT wiTh The 5.H.O., Police STaTion Ambikapur vide Annexure P—2, however, no proTecTion, as prayed, has been exTended To Them. 4. AfTer going Through The avermenTs in The peTiTion as also in The complainT of Annexure P—Z, iT is observed ThaT no parTiculars regarding daTe, day, Time and Telephone number by which alleged ThreaT was held To The peTiTioners by respondenT No.5 have been given in The peTiTion and The peTiTion lacks in maTerial particulars. 5. However, This peTiTion is disposed of wiTh liberTy To The peTiTioners To approach The concerned police auThor'rly aT Ambikapur as and when They perceive any ThreaT To Their safety and whenever such complainT is made by The peTiTioners, The same shall be duly invesTigaTed by The respondenT auThoriTies and They shall also exTend proper safeTy To The peTiTioners in case iT is necessary. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra 3 Judge 1e__ -__‘ ;L___, Roshan/-