1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 593 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1643 OF 2008 Siddheshwar Dhondiba Karande........Appellant versus Government of Maharashtra & ors......... Respondents. Mr. P.D. Dalvi for the Appellant Mr. A.R. Patil AGP for the respondents CORAM: RANJIT V. MORE, J. DATED : 20th NOVEMBER,2008. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Dalvi the learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.Patil AGP for respondents 1 to 5. The appellant is the original plaintiff, who filed regular civil suit no. 189/05 (old regular suit No. 749/95) challenging legality, validity and correctness of the order passed by the Revenue Commissioner sanctioning fair price shop to respondent no.6. Suit was dismissed by the trial court, The appellant preferred an appeal before the lower appellate court. However, the same was also dismissed and therefore the present Second Appeal. 3. The appellant/plaintif's suit was dismissed after recording the finding that the order of Revenue Commissioner 2 sanctioning fair price shop in favour of respondent no.6 is legal and valid. The lower courts also held that the civil court has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit challenging the orders passed by the revenue authority in as much as the jurisdcition of the civil court is impliedly barred. The finding about the legality of the order of Revenue Commissioner are recorded after appreciation of the evidence on record. Appreciation cannot be said to be perverse. No question of law much less substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. Second Appeal is accordingly dismissed. 3. In view of the dismissal of the second appeal, civil application does not survive and the same is also dismissed. (R.V. More, J.)