IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 2ND APRIL 2009 / 12TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 9406 of 2009(U) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- BIJU.K.V.,S/O.VARGHESE, KARANGAL HOUSE, PIRAMADAM.P.O.,MUVATTUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR TRANSPORT OFFICER, ALUVA. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,KALADY. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N SATHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.9406 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 2nd day of April, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner states that he has purchased a vehicle No.KL 10/S 2588. It is stated that by Ext.P2 he sought NOC of the 2nd respondent to effect transfer of registration of the vehicle. However orders have not been passed on Ext.P2 which according to the petitioner is for the reason that when the vehicle was in the possession of the previous owner, a case was registered. Referring to Ext.P4 petitioner submits that in the case referred to above, fine has been imposed and that at present no case is pending. It is stated that there is no reason for the 2nd respondent to delay the orders on Ext.P2. Having regard to the above facts and taking note of the pendency of Ext.P2 before the 2nd respondent, it is directed that the 2nd respondent shall pass orders on Ext.P2 WP(c).No.9406/09 /2/ as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.9406/09 /2/