IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18586 of 2010 SAVITRI DEVI, wife of Late Mahendra Kamti, resident of Village Dhanga Purwari Tola, P.S.Arer, District Madhubani. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Chief Engineer, N.H. Wing, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Superintending Engineer, N.H. Works Circle, Patna. 5. The Executive Engineer, N.H. Division Near Telephone Bhawan, R. Block, Patna. 6. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. 7. Assistant Director, General Provident Fund, Pant Bhawan, Patna. 8. Kusma Devi, wife of Late Mahendra Kamti, resident of Village Dhanga Purwari Tola, P.S. Arer, District Madhubani. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 15.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also the learned counsel for the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite sanction orders, as contained in Annexures 5 and 6 series, payments have not been made to the minor children of the petitioner as yet. Learned counsel for the State as also the Accountant General submits that from the writ petition it is not clear as to whether necessary papers have been submitted to the authorities as indicated in the aforesaid office orders. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the grievances as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a - 2 - fresh representation before the Executive Engineer, N.H. Division Near Telephone Bhawan, R. Block, Patna (respondent no.5), with a copy to the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna (respondent no.6). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the unpaid claims pursuant to the sanction orders with regard to the payment of leave encashment, provisional gratuity as also the provisional family pension, along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in her representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the admissible amount could be paid to the petitioner, who is the mother of her minor children in whose favour sanction orders were issued. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)