AB 3309/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE H.BARUAH Heard Miss B.Devi, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B.B.Gogoi , learned Addl.P.P,Assam for the respondent-State who has produced the Case Diar y. The informant Musstt. Rukia Begum, wife of Hafizuddin Ahmed , a resident of No.1 Naromari P.S. Dharamtul,District Morigaon lodged an FIR on 10.9.11 with the Of ficer In charge Dharamtul P.S. alleging inter-alia that on the night of 9.10.1 1 at about 10 AM Md. Hatem Ali criminally entered into her house taking advant age of the absence of the other members of the family and assaulted her with bam boo stick causing grievous hurt and had taken way Rs. 15,000/-in cash by break ing open the box. In the FIR she also impleaded the following five persons as accused. (1) Moinul Hoque (2) Md. Hatem Ali (3) Md. Nurul Haque (4) Md. Suraj Ali (5) Md. Faizul Hoque Ms. Devi, learned counsel for the petitioner in support of the petition submitte d that Md. Hatem Ali, who alleged to have assaulted the informant has already be en released on bail and since they being the companion of Md Hatem Ali did not resort any atrocities or indulged in removing away the cash, they are entitle d to get the privilege of pre-arrest bail. In view of the facts and submission advanced by the learned counsel for the pet itioner ,we have carefully perused the materials available on record. There are no incriminating materials against the accused/petitioners. The accused/petitio ner had made out a prima face case for granting the privilege of pre-arrest bail . Accordingly, the prayer for pre-arrest bail stands allowed. Interim bail order dated 17.10.11 is made absolute . The bail petition stands disposed of.