IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3541 of 2010 PUKAR PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.6467 of 2010 KISHOR PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 19.5.2010 Heard. It is a case under Section 302 of the Penal Code and the two petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. which was lodged by the father of the son at 9 P.M. The paragraphs of the case diary which have been referred to by the lower court while dismissing the prayer of the petitioners have been read over to me and it has been contended that if at all the wife of the deceased or other family member of the deceased was knowing that any of the petitioners or, for that matter, any other was demanding rangdari and on account of non-payment of the same would have killed the deceased, the fact ought to have been stated in the F.I.R. Considering the facts and circumstances, let the two petitioners, namely, Pukar Paswan and Kishor Paswan be released from custody on their furnishing bonds each of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in Chandauti P.S.Casde No. 149 of 2009. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)