IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 2035 of 2009 (M/S) Sh. Anil Kumar Gupta and two others. …… Petitioners. Versus Smt. Shanti Sharma and four others. … Respondents. Sri Ramji Srivastava, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioners. Date December 02, 2009. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought for a direction to the trial court to allow the application filed by the petitioners in S.C.C. Revision No. 12 of 2009, Smt. Shanti Sharma Vs. Anil Gupta, pending before the District Judge, Dehradun (Annexure 3 to the petition). In the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has confined his prayer that a direction may be issued to the court concerned to decide the application dated 4-11-2009 moved by opposite party nos. 1 to 3 in the aforesaid S.C.C.Revision No. 12 of 2009 expeditiously. Prayer is innocuous. Accordingly, the District Judge Dehradun is directed to decide the application dated 4-11-2009 (paper no. 12-C) moved by the petitioners in S.C.C. Revision No. 12 of 2009, Smt. Shanti Sharma and others Vs. Anil Gupta and others, (copy Annexure-3 to the petition) after hearing the parties on merits, expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. ( B.S.Verma, J. ) RCP 2 3