WP(C) 364/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 13.01.2011 (Annexure-10) by w hich upon his reinstatement in service he has been posted at Kharupetia, Darrang . The petitioner was placed under suspension by order dated 20.11.2010. The reco rds produced by Ms. Seal, learned Standing counsel, Excise Department has revea led that there was a proposal for instatement of the petitioner vide office note dated 29.12.2010 and in acceptance of said proposal the Commissioner of Excise directed for reinstatement of the petitioner in service with posting at Kharupet ia. According to the petitioner, since prior to placing him under suspension by order dated 20.11.2010 (Annexure-5) he was posted in Guwahati, he should be posted in Guwahati upon his reinstatement. According to the petitioner he has be en posted at Kharupetia in view of his earlier approach to this Court by filing W.P.(C) No. 25/2011 by which the order of suspension was put to challenge. The w rit petition was disposed of providing that the petitioner would prefer an appea l to the authority against the suspension order. There is nothing on record to show that the petitioner has been posted at Kharup etia as a sequel to the earlier writ petition. The writ petition was disposed of by order dated 10.01.2011, but the proposal for instatement in service was made on 29.12.2010. This is not for the writ Court to decide as to whether a particular incumbent up on reinstatement in service should be posted in the place of his choice. If the petitioner is aggrieved by his posting at Kharupetia, it will be open for him to make representation to the authority who in turn may pass appropriate order in accordance with law. No opinion is expressed in this regard. If the petitioner m akes any representation to the Commissioner of Excise within one week from tod ay, the same may be disposed of as expeditiously as possible.