1 II isn IIiil IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ]VLAJc)_NO. , 5'53_ _OF 20 U APPELLANTS- Non Applicant No. 2 Non AppUcant No. 1 Respondents : 1. 2. 3. ^ysg" " •/ „.,•••*' ^""T^^^ 4. 1. Dwaru Ram Tarak, S/o Jethuram . Tarak, R/o vill. Pandri Distt. Raipur (C.G.) (Owner) 2. KhileshwarKumar Tarak, S/o Manharan Lal Tarak,R/oVill. Kopra, Thana &, Tah. Rajim, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) (Driver) VERSUS Smf. TikeshwariBai,W/o Jageshwar Tarak, aged20year (Applicant/Claiment no.lj Minor Khemraj, S/o Jageshwar Tcirak, aged 4 month (Applicant/Claiment no.2) Derharam Tarak, S/o Jethuram Tarak,aged52year ' (Applicant/Claiiment no.3) Smt. Mangteen Bai, W/o Derharam Tarak; aged 45 year (Applicant/Claiinent no.4) All R/o Village Kirwai, Tah. Rajim, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Bajaj Alianze Jeneral Insurance Co. Ltd., Through- Branch Office- Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) i (Noii. Applicant No.3t \ U/S1730FTHEMOTORVBHIC3LEA<3tl9®8 atRs.3.3S.400/-l \A ^ v^ Bt gilffi Divlsioa Beach Hoa'bic Sht-i i.5a. Quddusl & Kon'ble Sbfi G. Mitthaiudditt.JJ. Bl.A.jCi .) N0. 1818 GP 2011 APPELLAKTS V/l(\C^__3^53ju Dwara Ra-ijd. Tajak and ajiother RESPOKDEHT3 Snit. iiJkeshwaTi Bai axid others. J^ %. APFSAL U/S 173 O? TKE &10TOR VEHiCLES AC7,i9S8 Preseat: Shri Saujay Agrawal, couiisel with flie appeUaiits. ORALORDER (Fasseu oa 23th ofAugust, 2011) Per E.M. Quddasl. J. Heard. 2. Sta.tutoiy coio.pulsoiy deposlt has iiot been niade. Therefore, tiie appealunder Section 173 of fhe Motor Veliicles Act is juot luaintaiaable. 3. Iii view of .the above, tb.e appeal is disiiiissed. 'dS iiot uiaiutaiu.able. • 4. However, tlils wlll u.ot debax uQ.e- appeUau.ts to file a fi'esli appesil ,sut)Ject to cojiipliaii.ce of Section 173 of the Motor VehiclcsAct, regardiiig niandatojydeposit. : 5. Registry is directed to retui'n the eertjfied copy oftfae unpugned oru.er on counsel's furnishing: autiienticateu true copy of the sarne. .2- Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sdf- G. Minhajuddin Judge X-.-r