:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.89 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.89 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.89 OF 2008 WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.112 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.112 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.112 OF 2008 Niraj Rohit Oza & Anr. ...Appellants. v. Mrudula Rohit Oza ...Respondent. Mr.Nilesh B. Pawaskar i/by Mr.Samir Sarambalkar & Ms.Aparna Vhatkar , advs. for the Appellants. Mr.Sanjay Jain and Anirban Roy i/by M/s. Roy’s Law Firm , adv. for the Respondent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 1st February, 2008. DATE: 1st February, 2008. DATE: 1st February, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Parties. 2. In the Notice of Motion No.3379 of 2007 taken out by the plaintiff/respondent, order of temporary injunction was passed by the trial Court against the defendants. The defendants filed an appeal against that order, which is dismissed today. The defendants had also taken out Notice of Motion No.3447 of 2007 before the trial Court to recall the order in the Notice of Motion No.3379 of 2007. As that Notice of Motion was rejected, defendants preferred the present appeal. In view of the fact that order of the trial Court in the Notice of Motion No.3379 of 2007 is upheld and the appeal filed by the present appellants against that :2: order is dismissed, this appeal also does not survive. Appeal and the Civil Application stand dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)