HEGH CQB‘RT 9E 33%HaTE‘ISQARH 53$? EEE¢§$§¥R 5553 2 gQJ’ELE §E§RE JUS'E‘ESE ?%'E§E€%ER EIWAKER VLF. $3 i‘W}. q4i§£11§$i§§2 ?E’E‘§T§Ql‘§ER Ra§ssi1 K11“ a3: Magiiaiag‘ agaal about 2E: ysews, Sig. ghzi D.P.§v§2§1iiamg, rio. Gym Pest Eizi, Talm Mungéii, Distt f}... 1%}743r5azg KE$?%E§B£§:T% 1. of 13. Through rha 36611 t9 ills Gmvsnmmnt 0f Cbhaitiggsgrh. EducatiGn D€parime11§ Mim‘sny, D‘KS Bhawali, Raipur {CG} Siam Th6 ASSistall‘i Commissimmr, Tribal Wdfarc Departmmif, Distt. Kerba {CG} Tim Biock Davalopment Oiiicsy, Bisck Podiupmra, Distt‘ Km‘ba {CG WRET PETETEQN UMBER AaRTECLE 226 GF TEE €$3§$TETEZTESE¥ @F EEBEA Amwearance:/ Shm‘ ’Azmrag Dayal Shxivasxava, counssl fer + As/ )k LO §€titione1n . Shri Pazkai Shrivastava, PL. for thE $tata. GRAL amm €13.352aa9; ‘W'ith €116 con$ent of the partiss, The: matttér is heard m €Jly. Th6 prasgnt writ yefxtion is not being fximi against aay bartlcular mnlgr but is; against €113 inaction 0n ths part of the resgxmdents by which the appiica‘dm‘; of the pstitionsr far appointment on campaSsionats ground under the mal i 1““3 3 W‘y f schsma of the State Govemmsnt {Aansxura 13—3) has 110‘: been &€cideé. Th6 gn'evanca of tha petitiormr is: that father of the peéiticner namgly Dwarika Prasad Mahiiarxg di’ed (m 24.1.2308 whsn he was working as Heafi Master 1'11 the School Education Deyartment. ’Fhe peiiticner hate moved 2m aggh'cation for compassionate a13§ointment hm. the said appEica‘rion haS 110‘; been decided. by the competent authorities whereae the Govermnent Cir way shows that if any such applieation is moved, the same may be decided withm a §eriod of three months. Learned counse1 for the petitioner contends that the respondents be directed to decide the application of the petitioner at the earliest because he. arid his family members are ill great hardship. On the other hand, learned counsel foe the State fairly submits that the ease of the petitioner would be deeided at the earliest i have heard counsel for the parties. The’petition is disposed of with .a direction to the respondents to/decide the ease of the yetitioner withiti a period of one iaonth from the date of receipt of the order, it would be the duty of the petitioner to appxise the authoiities regarding the order passed by this Court. /