IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No: 2816 of 2008 Between: 1 Chitra Sivaiah, S/o.Obilesu, Hindu R/o.Akuthotapalli(V)Anantapur(M) Anantapur Dist 2 Chitra Peddanna, S/o.C.Obilesu, Hindu R/o.Akuthotapalli(V)Anantapur(M) Anantapur Dist ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Anantapur,Anantapur Dist 2 The Inspector of Police,Itikapalli Circle, Itikalapalli Police Station, S.K.University Anantapur (M), Anantapur Dist 3 The Sub-Inpector of Police, Itikalapalli Circle, Itikalapalli Police Station,S.K.University, Anantapur (M), Anantapur Dist 4 G.Ramanjaneyulu, S/o.Subbireddy, Prop: Sivaram Lodge,Srikakulam Circle,Anantapur Dist .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.S.D.GOWD Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2816 of 2008 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.2 and 3 in interfering with the civil dispute between the petitioners and respondent No.4, as illegal and violation of the Constitution. The petitioners also sought for a direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 not to interfere with the civil disputes. Heard Sri S.D. Gowd, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader passed on a copy of the counter affidavit in which it is mentioned that on the complaint given by respondent No.4 that the petitioners trespassed into his house situated in Sy.No.140 of Akuthotapalli village, crime No.8 of 2008 was registered under Sections 447, 427 and 352 read with 34 IPC against the petitioners and they were arrested on 14.02.2008 and produced before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Anantapur, who remanded them to judicial custody. It is further stated that investigation has been completed and charge sheet will be filed before the Court shortly. The respondents also denied the allegation of harassment and interfering with the civil dispute. The statement made by the respondents in the counter affidavit is taken on record and the writ petition is disposed of. If in future the respondents seek to interfere with the property dispute between the petitioners and respondent No.4, the petitioners shall be free to approach this Court again. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.3630 of 2008 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 03.03.2008 ES