ig3Ei5} 1n tha High Court mf madhya Pradesh at,3aba1§ur 1 misc. iiatitiun Naggé of 1985 ’?atitione;: m/s &urg Transport Ca. {$Vt.) itd., Hurg ‘. r < ‘ ‘ — versus — $tate §f madhya Fradesh Respond%nts:i1. Executive Enginaar, P.%.D., Balad $ivisinn, ’ ‘x Balgd’ gistrict Raipuy. sXed HI Dav £(;{€Y I _ sh“ m?!“ ZMé’Q‘ imam Fannm umuER ARTIcmsg gg a: gzz g1? THE ' gimrrmggw as? mam Advocate. .mH , 2m F y t a‘vé‘n ! ‘ anew mmW -? W‘fg in accordance with law is passed against the J to the petitioner t0 ck priate forum- J I ‘ (hRPRJ FWHlnlfZOOl—5O‘000. \ a / kallenge the same before appro~ With the afwéasaid directiéns‘ and observations N Sd/- ? 1 Fakhruddin Judge Wmgaaaqa) . However, if any adverse: Order aetitioner’ it; shall be open the petition is disposfd of. é, M. wa