IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 21148 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 16.09.2011 Sahab Kaur ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. ..... RAJESH BINDAL, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that six of the co- accused in the FIR have been acquitted after trial. The petitioner has been implicated with the aid of Section 120-B IPC with the allegations that she had paid money to the other accused for purchasing pistol, used in the crime. The person, who allegedly purchased pistol, has been acquitted. Aforesaid facts are not disputed by the learned counsel for the State. Considering the aforesaid submissions, in my opinion, the peti- tioner is not required to be taken into custody. She will appear before the In- vestigating Officer on 26.09.2011 at 10.00 a.m. to join investigation and in case of arrest, she shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satis- faction of the Investigating Officer. She shall appear before the Investigat- ing Officer as and when called upon for further investigation. She shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 16.09.2011 sharmila