HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.792 OF 2011 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is directed against the order, dated 28.03.2011, passed in C.F.R.No.1813 of 2011 in P.R.No.213 of 2002 - 2003, on the file of the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Huzurabad, whereby the learned Magistrate declined to entertain the petition filed for return of F.D.R.No.2635584 for Rs.25,000/-, which was deposited by the petitioner as security for release of the vehicle seized in connection with C.O.R.No.213 of 2002 – 2003 of Prohibition and Excise Station, Jammikunta, Karimnagar District, for the offence punishable under Section 13 (f) read with 34 (e) of the Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968. It is seen from the record that subsequently, the petitioner filed Criminal Petition No.552 of 2011 before this Court to quash the proceedings in P.R.No.213 of 2002 – 2003 of Prohibition and Excise Station, Jammikunta, Karimnagar District, and this Court vide order, dated 25.01.2011, quashed the proceedings in the said P.R. In view of the fact that the proceedings in P.R.No.213 of 2002 – 2003 were quashed, the petitioner is entitled for return of the F.D.R. and the learned Magistrate was not justified in rejecting the petition for return of the F.D.R., which was deposited by the petitioner with the Deputy Commissioner, Prohibition & Excise, Karimnagar. Hence, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed and the impugned order is set aside. The Deputy Commissioner, Prohibition & Excise, Karimnagar, respondent No.1 herein, is directed to return the above mentioned Fixed Deposit Receipt to the petitioner under proper acknowledgement. ________________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J April 01, 2011 MD HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.792 OF 2011 April 01, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.792 OF 2011 Between: V. Punnam Chander ..... PETITIONER AND The Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise and another ....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: