1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR . CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.174 OF 2009. SHRI SHYAMRAO NARAYAN SAHARE VS SHRI ANAND CHARANDAS MAHAJAN ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri S. S. Meshram, Advocate for applicant. Coram : A.H. JOSHI, J. Date : 25th March, 2010. 1. Heard Learned Advocate for the appellant. 2. Perused the Judgment. 3. It is seen that the order of acquittal is based on two reasons : (i) That the document Exh.44 relied upon by the complainant that indicates to be attested, however, actually does not bear attestation of the witnesses and therefore, transaction of borrowing money. (ii) The cheque subject matter though issued was not dishonoured in its common meaning, but has been returned as no account 2 in that name exists. 4. The finding of the Trial Court that the transaction cannot be believed is a fact finding reached by the trial Court on appreciation of the evidence. No grounds are shown as to why this finding should be disregarded as perverse or contradictory to law or rendered in disregard of evidence on record. 5. The appeal, therefore, is having no merit and is rejected. Judge |mule|