THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.31206 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed with the prayer, which reads as under: “For the reasons and facts stated above, the petitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to take appropriate coercive steps by invoking the provisions of Section 105-B(i) of Criminal Procedure Code, to intimate to the LOC.Cell of Competent Passport Office and take all further necessary procedural steps to produce Accused No.1 by name Vedala Jaya Raju S/o Vedala Rambabu, aged 30 years, Occ:Software Engineer, Permanent resident of Valagalavaripalem, Penumentra Mandal, West Godavari District, presently residing at U.S.A. with Passport No.E034692, Visa Control No.20070105810001 before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nidadavole in C.C.No.1028/2008.” Petitioner lodged a complaint on 04.07.2008 before the third respondent - Station House Officer, Nidadavolu Police Station, West Godavari District, stating that her husband and in-laws have harassed her for additional dowry, and requested to take necessary action. Based on the said complaint, a case in Crime No.112 of 2008 was registered for the offences under Section 498-A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1989 against A.1 to A.4. It is the grievance of the petitioner that to produce Accused No.1, who is the sixth respondent herein, the respondent authorities are not invoking the powers under Section 105-B(1) of Cr.P.C. and also not taking further steps for opening a Lookout Circular against the sixth respondent. Detailed counter-affidavit is filed by the third respondent. In the counter-affidavit, it is stated that on the complaint of the petitioner, crime was registered and A.2 and A.3 were arrested on 05.07.2008 and were produced before the learned II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kovvur. It is further stated that in the aforesaid crime, A.4 obtained anticipatory bail in Crl.M.P.No.1574 of 2008 on the file of the District and Sessions Judge, West Godavari District. So far as A.1, who is the sixth respondent herein, is concerned, it is stated that he is absconding. It is further stated that after completion of investigation, charge sheet was already filed. The efforts are being made to nab the sixth respondent herein. It is also stated that after filing the charge sheet, NBWs were also issued by the learned Magistrate and LOC was opened vide file No.6/SIC/2010 (15)- II-1659 and the same was communicated to all the Airports in India with instructions to apprehend A.1, whenever he comes down to India. So far as the relief claimed by the petitioner for issuance of Lookout Circular against the sixth respondent is concerned, it is evident from the counter-affidavit that such Circular has already been issued against the sixth respondent, by the police concerned. As much as it is stated that the Lookout Circular has already been issued against the sixth respondent, as evident from the counter- affidavit, I deem it appropriate to direct respondents 1 to 5 to take steps to enforce the warrants, which are pending execution against the sixth respondent. Subject to the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 30th MARCH, 2011. kvni