HIGH COURTOF CtJHATTtSGAfW AT BtLASPUR WRJTPETlTfON(STNo73M3of2067 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Toran Prasad Kaushik, S/o Shri G.P. Kaushik, aged about 46 ysara, R/o Pogriha, Post Matsagra, Takha^Mir, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of ChhaUisgarh, Through Secretary, EducaUon Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Dfrector of Public Instruction, Pensionbada, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTtON OF INDtA SlngteBench : Hon'ble Mr. Justtee Satlsh K.Agnihotri Present: lllBfur—l Mr. Kumaresh Tjwari, Advocate forthe prtiUoner. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel lawyer forthe respondents^tate. Bi- ORDER (Passed on 13m day of June,2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for tte petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact and quesBon ctf law fnvolved in the present wrtt petlUon are the same to ttiat of In Yashwant Kumar BharadwaJ Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96), which has been dfsposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not confrovert the sald submission. 2. Accordingly, the writ petffion ts allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Btaradwaj Vs. Munidpal Corporation, Durg and anottier (Supra), subject to vsrtfication of the fact as to whether the petltoner has acquiisd B.Ed. Examination Certificate on hls own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1^8 and 01.03.1999 and further whether he has been pakl <wo advance increments or not. No order as to costs. i sd/- SatisbK.Agnihotri Judge T"°»-