3b. cr appa 1076-10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1076 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 632 OF 2010 Mayur Ganpatsinh Chauhan .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. M.K. Kocharekar for the Applicant Mr. V.B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the State Mr. Nalawade for the Union Terriotry CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J DATE : 1st SEPTEMBER, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant original accused has been convicted under Section 307 of IPC and sentenced to RI for 3 years. Against the said order,he has preferred the appeal. Now, the applicant is seeking bail. 3. Learned advocate for the applicant states that besides the present case, the applicant has a clean record. He further states that the applicant was on bail during the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. Both these statements have not been controverted by learned APP. 1 3b. cr appa 1076-10.doc Moreover, it is seen that the sentence is only for three years and the appeal is not likely to come up for hearing in the near future. Thus, looking to the evidence on record and the above facts, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. Hence, the order: O R D E R 1. Applicant Mayur Ganpatsinh Chauhan be released on bail in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- [Rs. Twenty Five Thousand Only] each with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The Applicant shall report to the concerned Police Station once in a month till disposal of the appeal. 2. Application is allowed in above terms. [SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] 2 3b. cr appa 1076-10.doc 3