IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 9648 of 2010 Date of decision: 31.3.2010 Jaimal Singh and another Petitioner vs. State of Haryana Respondent Present: Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioners have filed this petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. for an appropriate direction to respondent No.2 to protect their life and liberty at the hands of respondents 3 and 4 at the instance of respondent No.5. The petitioners claim that Parvinder Kaur and Rattan Lal had married and sought protection from the High Court. The petitioners had appeared as witnesses at the time of the marriage. It is claimed that the petitioners had helped the run away couple and they are being harassed by respondent No.5 with the help of the police. The petitioners have not submitted their grievance to S.P. Kurukshetra and have not disclosed as to how they are being harassed. This petition is disposed of being pre-mature with liberty to the petitioners to approach S.P. Kurukshetra within a period of one week. In case any complaint/ representation is made to the said officer, the same would be looked into and it will be ensured that the petitioners are not unnecessarily harassed. It is, however, made clear that in case the petitioners are to be called to the police station for any inquiry, the provisions of Section 160 Cr.P.C. will be complied with. March 31 ,2010 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE