IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17523 of 2011 Shyam Nandan Sinha son of late Raghunandan Singh, Resident of Mohalla Dahiyawan Tola, North to the Railway Line, P.O. Chapra, P.S. Chapra Town, District Saran, Pin-841301. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Vice Chancellor, J.P. University, Chapra. 4. The Registrar, J.P. University, Chapra. 5. The Vice Chancellor, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. 6. The Registrar, B.R.A. Bihar University, Chapra. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 4. 13.10.2011. Today again, none appeared on behalf of respondent nos.3 and 4/J.P. University. Continuously none is appearing on behalf of the respondent/J.P. University, which is evident from the order dated 30.9.2011 and 12.10.2011. Heard Shri Shashi Shekhar Tiwary, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Umesh Kumar, learned A.C. to G.P.1, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2 and learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.5 and 6/B.R.A. Bihar University. None appeared on behalf of respondent nos.3 and 4/J.P. University. The petitioner, who retired on 31.5.2002 as Reader, Department of Philosophy from Jaglal Choudhary College 2 under J.P. University, has prayed for directing the respondents to revise his pension with effect from 1.1.2006 in terms of Government Resolution No.820 dated 23.9.2009 as well as in terms of order passed by this Court in a case reported in 2011(1)PLJR 900 (Dr. Himanshu Bhushan Vs. Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University and others) and other connected writ petitions. The petitioner has further prayed for directing the respondents to grant benefit of merger of Dearness relief with effect from 1.1.2005 in terms of Government Notification dated 11.4.2005 as well as in terms of order passed in Dr. Himanshu Bhushan’s case (Supra). The petitioner has further prayed for directing the respondents to grant other relief. So far as relief in respect of revision of pension and merger of Dearness relief are concerned, the writ petition stands disposed of in terms of order passed in Dr. Himanshu Bhushan’s case (Supra). So far as other reliefs are concerned, the petitioner is granted liberty to file proper representation before respondent no.3/Vice 3 Chancellor, J.P. University as well as respondent no.5/Vice Chancellor, B.R.A. Bihar University regarding the claim made in the present writ petition within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, both the respondents i.e. respondent nos.3 and 5 are required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. If they consider the claim of the petitioner as genuine, they are required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, they are directed to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within four months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)