IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 302 OF 2009 SHRI. RAVI HUNSHAL ... Petitioner Versus THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PANAJI THROUGH COMMISSIONER AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Mahesh Sonak, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shivan Dessai, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. V. Rodrigues, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Ketan Ghatkar, Advocate for respondent No.3. Coram:- NARESH H. PATIL & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 21st January, 2010 P.C. Learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the respondent - the Corporation of City of Panaji, have presented written consent terms, duly signed by them along with the petitioner and the Commissioner of City of Panaji. The same are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. 2. Learned Counsel for the Corporation of City of Panaji submits that in the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the Corporation has consented to the arrangement arrived at in the consent terms. Both the learned Counsel pray for disposal of the petition in the light of the consent terms. The Counsel appearing for respondents No.2 and 3 submit that respondent No.2 and 3 being formal parties, have no objection for the disposal of the petition, in terms of the consent terms. 3. The petition is disposed of in the light of the consent terms. No order as to costs. NARESH H. PATIL, J. U. D. SALVI, J. ssm.