1 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.6714 of 2009 Bhima Khandu Jamkar & ors. ... Petitioners versus Namdeo Tukaram Jamkar & ors. ... Respondents ... Mr.R.N.Gite for the petitioner. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATED : 17h June 2010 P.C. 1. This Writ Petition is directed against the order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Nashik in a proceedings arising out of the entries made in the revenue records. It is settled principle of law that entries in the revenue records are made for fiscal purposes and they do not confer or take away any title. Hence, petition is misconceived. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that substantive suit was filed by petitioner no.1 regarding the title and in appeal, the District Judge has passed a decree in favour of the petitioner. Second Appeal has been preferred by the respondent in which the order of the District Judge has been stayed by this Court. It would be open to the petitioner to move the revenue authorities again after the decision of the second appeal. With these observations, writ petition is rejected summarily. (D.G. KARNIK,J.)