RSA No.1787 of 2002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.1787 of 2002 . Decided on: December 03, 2009. Hari Singh .. Appellant VERSUS Shamsher Kaur etc. .. Respondents * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporter? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? * * * PRESENT Mr.Gaurav Chopra, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr.S.S.Rangi, Advocate, for the respondents. M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Suit of the plaintiff-appellant for joint possession of the property mentioned in heading of the plaint claiming himself to be co-owner along with defendant Nos.1 to 3, stands dismissed by the Courts below holding that the property is not Joint Hindu Family property and that the plaintiff is not the coparcener in the property in . . . 1 RSA No.1787 of 2002 dispute. Besides this, the Courts below have relied upon a decree dated 26.05.1979, in Civil suit No.117 of 1979, by virtue of which the plaintiff-appellant had been given his due share out of the property owned by his father Sampuran Singh, defendant No.1. The share of the plaintiff-appellant and the defendants-respondents was incorporated in the revenue record on the basis of the decree dated 26.05.1979. The plaintiff in his cross-examination has admitted the the transfer of his share of the land and the consent decree in the year 1979. In view of concurrent finding of fact arrived at against the appellant by the Courts below, no ground is made out for interference. No substantial question of law arises for adjudication. Dismissed. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE December 03, 2009. rka . . . 2