<l^f0^7 o SIISfij K EiE^r&u 13fci^i?H IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATMLASPUR PETITIONER ^ ^y- •^-" '%./" y RESPONDENTS Writ Petition (S) No."?2y$.. of 2010 ^.••'^.^ ^7%% ^y^y '.%*'"" Mangal Madho Kapdne S/o.Shri Mado Kapdne Aged about 35 years Presently working as Assistant Gr.III In the O/o. The ExecutiveEngineer Public Works Department Vidhan Sabha Division Raipur R/o. 1-17, Kashiram Nagar Raipur (CG) Versus TheUnionofIndia Through:.The Secretary Personnel & Training New Delhi ^ State Govt. ofM.P. Through: Secretary Public Works Department Vallabh Bhawan, Mantralaya, Bhopal 3 State Govt. o®BC.^'^7^-10 Through: Secretary Public Works Department DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur 4 The Engineer-in-Chief Public Works Department Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 5 < The Chairman Advisory Committee State Reorganization Cell Govt. of M.P. General Administration Department Bhopal WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ~3.iB3@ag^Xl-HC—78 ^i^i^l^N? WT W^T^TTO 'S^ ^WW^, W^WKo, f^dl-M^ NlNC^T^lW^l ^^ t^b. 12- ^200 Q^ ^TI^T 'IT^RR> ( ytt^^) ^RfTW^rflFcT 3^T^T SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra rvloh^ 1Q-Q8-2Q1Q Shri Sanjay K. Agmwai, cc| counsel for the petiuoner. Shri Kashifohakeej, counsell Shri Vinod Tekam, Panei Ua\| Heard on admission. By this petition, the petitione^ order reiating to ailocation passed ^ (Annexure P/2). Submission of leamed counl waa appointed cn 2/7794 as A^ Departrnent at Bhopai and iater or1 Pradesh, though petitjoner opted fl aiiocated to the State of Chhattil excess empioyees in the optlon il^ Annexure P/2. . in compiiance of ajlocation| services in the State of Chhattisyar| service of the petjtioner to the Sta| severai petitions filed before ti| consideration of representauon empioyees were aiso sent back to from Annexure P/4. it is submitted La^yer '^T?(fe?zft7f TTP:?^yf ^ fe^t <py|^l< ^)'^tfiR31^t3?T [lS!^Flvastava,*j, unsei along with Shri Sudeep AgrawaJ^ ifuf responderlt No1. for the State. seeks to chaljenge leyaiity and vaJidity of .n 21/OS/01 (Annexure F71) and 28/9/2001 ^ei for the peutioner is that the petjtioner ^sistant Grade-lii in the Pubilc Works upon reorganjsation of'State of Ivladhya |>r the State-of rvladhya -Pradesh, he "was ?garh, even though there' were aiready t, as is refiected from Aonexure P/1 and order (Annexure P/3),' peutloner Jojned h. it is. submitted that the ajlocatjon of the^ |;e of Chhattisgarh is iHegal and eariler in |is Cuurt;, directions were issyed for ^nd in many cases, simjiariy situated l|ie State of ivladhya Pradesh as is evident that several representations were made r-'" t ..-^^^% <s,.^ i-^ss^. j ••••^s'y -.^^...^.^- *11*1CTI tt»*«(<»» TST "4i'4i<yi^, ^^•y4i^, f®i<ni<^< ^^...U^..^7...3.^W.^ "'^1200 3ff^T ^T fqilcn ^WT 3n^[sr)*iiq» ^. 3Fn^?T 17^R> ( yiiyK^I) ir^nw 1Rft<r ^n^r Frorn the pieadlngs and petitioner was aiiocated to the S| ctiHm<fli 'HR^Jf ^f fs^ 'rf^t^K ^^tRww^T praying for consideration of his r^presentation for aiiocation to the State of Madhya Pradesh, but his grievancje has not been redressed. Socuments on record, it is clear that the, |:ate of Chhattisgarn way back in the year 2002. However, petitioner did n^. take recourse to any rernedy available to him under the iavv, if at ali, he| aiiocation. The petitioner did not and the llrst representation made had any grievance.agajnst the.order of ^iake.any reps-esentation for alrnost 3 years jjy hirn and piaced on record is on 19/10/05 foiiowed by another representau^rt. Petitioner has approached this Court after aimost 8 years of his ailocation to the State of Chhattisgarh- in similar circumstances, pertaining to grie^ance arlslng out uf aljocayon, thi? Court dlsmissed Vv.P.(S) No.5429/08) No.5430/08 vide order dated 29/(] 22/09/08 on account of deiay and| placed on record by the counsej fortaking documents on record. in view of the above. thi^ vide order dated 23/09/08, VV.P.(S) QfQQ W.P.(S) No.5260/08 vide order dated iaches. Copies of.those orders have been ror respondent No.1 aiong -wlth appiication petitlon is liable to be dismissed on the ground ofuelay and iaches. Accoitiingiy, the petltion is dismissed. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^^ ^TWft^ t?NN g^n^?I, ^R-^T^ —FS/147—2/2010 —1,00,000. t",