c^ l '/^ 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OP JUDICATUKE AT BILASPUR rC.G.] WRITPETITION (S) N0. 2-?6^ /2010 •t>t PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^ .-•^ ^.-^*. .^M^ ^i^ /\.^^ v <f JC"" ^y/' 'o Late Trilok Das Aged- i- about 30 years, R/o village- Janjgi, Thana- Lakhanpur, Block- Udaipur, Tahsil-Ambikapur, Distt.- Sarguja [C.G.] VERSUS ^ l.State of Chhatdsgarh Through- Secretaiy, Tribal Welfare department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.J 2, Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Ambikapur, Sarguja [C.G.] 3. Block Education officer, Block- Udaipur, District -Sarguja [C.G-] WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTIONS -y^ iia i!'f33!l ~s^ •^i<<i<nAi, ®Ti1y'i<»,'!^?iray .M.^....^.o.-..3^l^ *i*lid<il-i vs^ •?fe^ wrlare ^sifiiH SB : Hon bie ShnwlaniDura Mohan Si'H'jvastava, >|. 18-06-201n Shri jitendra Shrivastava, courjsei for the petitioner. i-ieara. Subrnission of fearned counsel for the petitioner is that after the death OT nis Tainer, an appiicaiion ror gram y cornpasionais appoinimeni »vasmaae .-? E-1S-. •?-E-''t-. .—~ --1 before the respondent autnorities representations. However, tiil u'ate on 'n;u//uo, loiiowea oy serverai the respondents have not taken anv Gecision on the saiQ representatjon. ipn account of deiay, tne very purpose of grant of compasionate appointrnent is|being frustrated. Taking into consideration th^ nature of grievance ralsed by the petitioner, it wouiu be in the int^rsst of justice to Issu'e directiori to respondents No.2 and 3 to considsil petitioneis representation for urant of compasionaie appoinimeni ana aecipe ine same vflinin an ouier rnoriuis frorn the date of receipt of coj or o ^y of thls order. Neediess to ernphasize, If gri^vance of the petltioner suli surv'ives, he woulu be at liberfry to take recourse (o such rernedy, as may be avaliabie to nirn unaer ine iaw. vyith the aforesald uirection, tn^ petiuon is linaliy disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge