IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9168 of 2011 SUNIL KUMAR YADAV @ SUNIL YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 30.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Allegedly, the petitioner tried to commit rape upon the informant’s minor daughter but he was caught by one woman as well as informant. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that one Razia Devi and Nisha Kumari, who are said to be witnesses of the alleged occurrence, have already been declared hostile and they have not supported the prosecution case. It appears from perusal of the first information report itself that neither informant nor any person has seen the alleged occurrence and moreover, as per submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, matter has already been compromised between the parties. Petitioner is in jail custody since 28.7.2010. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as period of detention of the petitioner in jail custody, let petitioner, Sunil Kumar Yadav @ Sunil Yadav, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge FTC No. IV, Supaul in Sessions Trial no. 274/2010 arising out of Nirmali P.S. Case no. 35 of 2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)