IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (l) NO.2718 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION (l) NO.2718 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION (l) NO.2718 OF 2005 Anitha Ashok Shetty ..Petitioner versus The Deputy Commissioner of Police, (H.Q), Greater Mumbai & Anr. ..Defendants Ms. Veena Thadani for the Petitioner Ms. Geeta Shashtri AGP for the Respondents Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 23rd Nov., 2005 Dated : 23rd Nov., 2005 Dated : 23rd Nov., 2005 P.C. 1. The learned AGP makes a statement that the Petitioner has come to this Court by this Petition against the Order dated 29.10.2005 passed by the Deputy Chief Minister (Home) and the Government will withdraw the said order but liberty be granted to proceed with the appeal afresh as per the provisions of Section 33 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951. Learned Advocate for the Petitioner has no objection for the same. In view of this, nothing survives in this petition and the same shall have to be disposed off. However, it is made clear that till the time the appeal is decided by the Government under Section 33 as mentioned above, the order dated 28.3.2005 passed in Writ Petition No.852 of 2005 shall remain in force and the order of suspending Petitioner’s license No.110/96, passed by Deputy Commissioner of Police (HQI), Brihan Mumbai, shall not be acted upon. 2. Hence, the writ petition is disposed off in above terms. (S.R.Sathe, J.)