IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 906 OF 2006 SUMMONS NO. 906 OF 2006 SUMMONS NO. 906 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO. 651 OF 2004 NO. 651 OF 2004 NO. 651 OF 2004 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 1637 OF 1980 NO. 1637 OF 1980 NO. 1637 OF 1980 Ravi Jagannath Mohanti ] .. Appellant Versus 1. Parshuram T. Shinde & 6 ors. ] .. Respondents Ms. P. Contractor with Mr. Narayan Swamy i/b M/s. Shroff & Co. for the appellant. Ms. Rekha Shinde i/b M/s. Harakchand & Co. for the respondent No.1. Mr. Nusrat Shah with Mr. Alex Almeida and Ms. Ema Almeida i/b Mr. A.K. Gupta for respondent No.3 - applicant in support of the Chamber Summons. CORAM: R.M. LODHA, & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED: 10TH NOVEMBER, 2006 P.C. : . We heard the counsel for the appellant and perused the Affidavit in support of the Chamber Summons. We also considered the original Written Statement and the issues framed in the Suit. 2. The proposed amendments are not necessary to decide the real controversy between the parties at the : 2 : stage of Appeal. . Chamber Summons does not deserve to be granted and is dismissed. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- [J.H. [J.H. [J.H. BHATIA, J.] BHATIA, J.] BHATIA, J.]