IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 549 OF 2011 SHRI GOVIND @ BHIKOBA NARAYAN PRIOLKAR AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus SHRIUTTAM YESO SATTARKAR @ PRIOLKAR (SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LR'S) AND ORS., ... Respondents Mr. J. J. Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P. Arolkar,Advocate for respondent no.1(a) &(b). Mr. G.Shirodkar, Government Advocate for respondent no. 2. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 15th September, 2011 P.C. Shri J. Mulgaonkar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks leave to delete the names of respondent nos.4 to 10. 2. Leave granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 3. Heard Shri J. Mulgaonkar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, Shri P. Arolkar, learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.1(a) & (b) and Shri G. Shirodkar, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondent no.2. 4. Rule, heard forthwith by consent of learned Counsel appearing for the respondents. 5. Shri P.Arolkar, learned Counsel waives service on behalf of respondent no.1(a) & (b). 6. Shri G. Shirodkar, learned Government Advocate waives service on behalf of respondent no.2. 7. After hearing the matter for sometime, the learned Counsel for the respondents does not dispute that the impugned order dated 29.07.2011 passed by respondent no.2 was without issuing notice to the petitioners and other parties to the proceedings no. PON/TNC/REV/23/2011. Hence, the following order is passed by consent : (i) The impugned order dated 29.07.2011 is quashed and set aside. (ii) The respondent no.2 is directed to decide the case No. PON/TNC/REV/23/2011 afresh after giving due notice to the petitioners and other parties to the said proceedings in accordance with law. (iii) The respondent no.2 is also directed to decide if any interim application is filed in the said proceedings. 8. Rule in above terms with no order as to costs. 9. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. 10. The parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order. F. M. REIS, J. at*