IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 7688 of 2010 Date of Decision: 25.11.2010 Sawtantra Kumar Kher .... Petitioner Versus Manoj Bansal and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Mukand Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Vide impugned order dated 11.10.2010, learned Rent Controller has directed the tenant-petitioner to pay rent to respondent No. 1 – co-owner/co-landlord of the property. The apprehension of learned counsel for the petitioner-tenant is if rent is paid to respondent No. 1 only, other respondents - co-owners may sue tenant for arrears of rent. Apprehension of petitioner-tenant is misconceived, if rent is directed to be paid to one of the co-landlord under the order of the Court, it would be presumed that co-landlord is receiving rent on behalf of the co-landlords. No further order is required. Dismissed. (ALOK SINGH) 25.11.2010 JUDGE reena