IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20301 of 2011 Manish Kumar @ Munna S/O HARISH CHANDRA SHARMA, R/O VILLAGE SAHAR TELPA, P.S. KARPI, DISTRICT-ARWAL, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT 1/73, A.P. COLONY GAYA, P.S. RAMPUR, DISTRICT-GAYA. --PETITIONER Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. NEETU @ ANNAPURNA, D/O PRABHASH KUMAR BHASKER R/O PREM NAGAR, HORILGANJ, P.S. JEHANABAD, DISTRICT-JEHANABAD. 2 15.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for opposite party no.2. Opposite party no.2, the informant, is said to be present in court during submissions. Petitioner is named accused, being husband of the informant. It is submitted on behalf of the Bar that the parties are ready and willing to resume and continue their matrimonial relationship with all due dignity and respect to each other as well as respective family members. The parties agreed to appear before the court below with a joint petition of compromise affixing their pair photograph on 08th August, 2011. They will not only settle this case but also file an adquate petition seeking disposal of the cases on the basis of agreement entered into. 2 In the compromise petition to be filed before the court below the parties shall fix the date on which the petitioner, that is the husband, shall visit the place of the informant to bring her at his place but in the way the couple will come to the court and only from there they will leave for their destination. Considering the facts and circumstances and anticipated relationship between the parties, the petitioner, on the date fixed or even earlier, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in Rampur P.S. Case no. 169 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. The Court concerned shall, on filing of such application, permit the parties to do as per the terms of agreement but shall have an over watch for their conduct for 3 a reasonable period and only on being satisfied after having sufficient reason pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. Le the order be communicated to the court below (Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya) at the cost of the petitioner. AAhmad ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)