IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36677 of 2010 RAM SAREKH SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04 05.01.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that in prayer portion in place of Gaya, it has wrongly been typed as Aurangabad. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the aforesaid defects during course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Guraru P.S. Case No. 04 of 2010 registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the accused column of F.I.R. but in the contents of the First Information Report, it has been mentioned that his cash was also snatched by the miscreants in the aforesaid occurrence. It appears from perusal of the impugned order of learned Sessions Judge as well as submissions of the parties that later on the name of this petitioner came in this case as an accused. Moreover, having similar allegation, one co-accused Ajay Kumar Singh @ Ajay Singh has already been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 26.10.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 24056 of 2010. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, petitioner, Ram Sarekh Singh is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with above stated Guraru P.S. Case No. 04 of 2010. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)