( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 383 OF 2010 Prashant s/o Chhabilal Sonawane PETITIONER VERSUS Krushali w/o Prashant Sonawane RESPONDENT ..... Mr. R.A. Tambe, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mukul Kulkarni, advocate for the respondent. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 27th April, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. The petition is disposed of, with liberty to apply afresh if some material regarding the plea of alleged unsoundness of mind is placed on record. The trial Court be not influenced with grant of such liberty and to decide the application, if so filed, on its own merits and also shall expeditiously decide the application for interim maintenance. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/wp383-2010 ( 2 )