IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.256 of 2008 NIRALA YADAV @ RAJA RAM YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 8 19.8.2008 In the instant writ petition the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to produce the petitioner in R© Case No.4(S) of 2002 pending in the court of District & Sessions Judge, Rohtas as well as in other cases which are pending for the production of the petitioner in other places in the Districts of Aurangabad and Gaya. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that production warrant has been issued for the production of the petitioner from the courts in the district of Rohtas as well as Aurangabad and Gaya. He further submits that the petitioner is facing trial in ten cases in the district of Rohtas, five cases in the district of Aurangabad and one case in the district of Gaya. Right to speedy trial is implicit in Article 21 of the Constitution of India and as such it ought to be endeavor of the authorities to see that the cases in which the accused is involved is tried speedily. In case if an accused is not produced in a court for a long time his right to speedy trial will be hampered. Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has already been shifted from Bhagalpur Central Jail to Sasaram Jail where the petitioner is facing large number of trials. In the aforesaid circumstances, one of the main grievances of the petitioner in respect of his being produced in court at Sasaram has been redressed on his transfer to Sasaram Jail. This goes without - 2 - KHAN saying that the authorities will like wise also ensure the production of the petitioner at other places so that the trial of other cases do not hamper. With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition stands dismissed. (S.P.Singh,J)