1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 920 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.4559 OF 1995 Sunder Ghumarimal Golani. ..Plaintiff. V/s. Dhiraj V. Sanghavi & Ors. ..Defendants. And Parwan constructions P.Ltd. ..Applicants. WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 914 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.3327 OF 1996 Glorimex Pvt.Ltd. ..Plaintiff. V/s. M. V. Sanghavi & Ors. ..Defendants. And Parwan constructions P.Ltd. ..Applicants. AND CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 916 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.2453 OF 1996 Master Anand N.Bachhawat. ..Plaintiff. V/s. M.V. Sanghavi & Ors. ..Defendants. And Parwan constructions P.Ltd. ..Applicants. AND CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 919 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.3990 OF 1996 Master Anand N. Bhachhawat. ..Plaintiff. V/s. Muktaben V. Sanghavi & Ors. ..Defendants. And Parwan constructions P.Ltd. ..Applicants. Mr. Piyush Shah for Plaintiff. 2 Mr.Tolat i/b L.C.Tolat & co. for applicants. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : SEPTEMBER 14, 2005. DATE : SEPTEMBER 14, 2005. DATE : SEPTEMBER 14, 2005. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. As conditional order has been complied with, chamber summons is taken on record and heard on merits alongwith the companion matters. 2. Counsel for the plaintiff has opposed this chamber summons. However, I see no reason to depart from the view taken in the companion chamber summons, which are already decided in the favour of the applicants. Counsel for the plaintiff contends that same proceedings were initiated, in which the applicants’ predecessor was party and applicants were bound by the decisions in those proceedings. That aspect cannot prevent me from considering the present application, which is only for the limited relief of directing the applicants to be joined as defendants in the suit. The relief as prayed in the chamber summons will have to be granted without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties on merits of the case. Accordingly, this chamber summons will have to be granted for the same reasons as stated in the companion chamber summonses. 3 3. Chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). No order as to costs. Amendment to be carried out within four weeks.