IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3397 of 2009(O&M) DATE OF DECISION: AUGUST 19 , 2010 Birender Singh .....Petitioner VERSUS The State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. G.S. Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. So far there is no evidence on record to indicate that the petitioner, who is a contractual employee, has been either replaced by any contractual employee or there is any such move. The writ petition is pre-mature and is dismissed accordingly. The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the appointment of the person, if he is replaced by any contractual employee. August 19, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE