IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 22ND AUGUST 2008 / 31ST SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 32043 of 2005(M) --------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. R.JAYA, W/O.VIJAYAKUMAR.S., RESIDING AT AMRUTHAPURI (INDIRA SADANAM), CHAKKUVAREKKAL VILLAGE, KOTARAKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DIST. 2. VIJAYANKUMAR.S., S/O.LATE P.SREEDHARAN PILLAI, AGED 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT AMRUTHAPURI (INDIRA SADANAM), CHAKKUVAREKKAL VILLAGE, KOTARAKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.PREMCHAND R.NAIR, ADV. SRI.VARGHESE.J.PUNNACHALIL. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHAKKUVARIKKAL VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA. 3. ADDITIONAL TAHASILDAR, KOTTARAKARA TALUK, KOTTARAKARA. 4. RAJESH.N., THUNDIL VEEDU, CHAKKUVAREKKAL P.O., KUNNIKODU (VIA), KOTTARAKARA. 5. SASIDHARAN PILLAI, CHENNANKARA PUTHEN VEEDU, CHAKKUVAREKKAL P.O., KUNNIKODU (VIA), KOTTARAKARA. W.P.(C). NO.32043/2005-M: 6. THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE, LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONERATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. NOBLE MATHEW FOR R1 TO R3 & R6, ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER GEORGE FOR R4 & R5, ADV. SRI.DILIP MOHAN FOR R4 & R5. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.32043/2005-M: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE ORDER NO. A-5852/05 DTD. 13/10/2005 OF THE R.1. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE ROUGH SKETCH OF THE PROPERTY BELONGS TO THE P.1. AND THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE P.1. BEFORE THE R.1. DTD. 09/11/2005. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE R6 DTD. 14/11/2005. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.P.(C). NO. 18864/2004 DTD. 07/07/2004. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. prv. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.32043 OF 2005 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of August, 2008. J U D G M E N T Prayer is for a direction to 6th respondent to dispose of Exhibit P4 appeal. In case the appeal has not been disposed of, there will be a direction to the 6th respondent to dispose of the same, with notice to the petitioners, respondents 4 and 5 and any other affected party, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Interim order passed by this Court will continue till such time. This writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. smp KURIAN JOSEPH, J. W.P.(C) No. 32043 OF 2005 J U D G M E N T 22.08.2008