IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 25 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 844 OF 2010 EDWARD D'LIMA AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus SHRI MORAD AHMAD, THE CHIEF TOWN PLANNER AND ANR., ... Respondents Ms.J. Fernandes, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A. Kamat, Additional Government Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 18th August, 2011 P.C. Heard Ms. J. Fernandes, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. A. Kamat, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents. 2. Affidavit filed by respondents discloses that in terms of order dated 14.3.2011 in Writ Petition no. 844/2010 passed by the Division Bench of this Court, respondent no.1 has directed Senior Town Planner, Margao to ascertain if there is violation of Section 17(A). According to learned Additional Government Advocate respondent no.1 superannuated on 31.5.2011. In the affidavit filed by respondent no.1 he has tendered apology on his part. Affidavit also discloses that thereafter site inspection was carried out and report has been submitted to the Chief Town Planner. 3. In view of the explanation given by respondent no.1, I do not deem it necessary to proceed with Contempt Petition. 4. In so far as respondent no.2 is concerned, learned Additional Government Advocate has placed on record copy of the order dated 14.7.2011 passed in MCA No. 654/2011 by which Division Bench has granted extension of time by period of two weeks for compliance of order dated 14.3.2011 by respondent no. 2. 5. In view of the said order, I do not deem it necessary to proceed with the contempt petition. In view of above, contempt petition against respondents are dropped. 6. Contempt Petition stands disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. vn