IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28893 of 2009 Md.Shahid, S/o Md. Daud, resident of Mohalla Babuganj, P.S. Alamganj, District- Patna. … Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar …… …. Opposite Party. For the Petitioner: Mr. Tailak Sao, Advocate. For the State: Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, A.P.P. ----------- 2 23.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State on the point of admission. This petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for quashing order dated 04.07.2008 passed in Kankarbagh P.S. Case No. 52 of 2008 by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna by which and whereunder he took cognizance for the offences under Sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code after receipt of the charge sheet in the above stated case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except the confessional statement of co-accused, there is nothing against the petitioner and even if the aforesaid confessional statement assumed to be true then also petitioner had purchased the vehicle in question after making full consideration so no case under the above stated offence is made out against the petitioner. In my view, it is not a proper stage to discuss the above stated points and the petitioner may raise the aforesaid points at the time of framing of the charge. 2 Accordingly, this petition is dismissed on admission stage itself with a liberty to petitioner to raise the above stated points at the framing of charge and if petitioner raises the aforesaid points at the time of framing of the charge, the learned Court below shall consider the above stated points in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order. Md. Ibrarul ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)