1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION GARNISHI GARNISHI GARNISHI NOTICE NO. 1192 OF 1999 NOTICE NO. 1192 OF 1999 NOTICE NO. 1192 OF 1999 IN SUM. SUIT NO. 1218 OF 1975 Govind N. Mehta ... Plaintiff Vs. R.M. Art Productions ... Defendants And Ms. Kaushalya Ratan Mohan and Ors. Applicants Ms. Namita Hemrajani for Plaintiff. Respondent No. 3 present. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M. KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M. KHANWILKAR,J. DATED DATED DATED : JUNE 08, 2005 : JUNE 08, 2005 : JUNE 08, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Respondent No. 3 has appeared in person. He submits that he has no sufficient means to engage services of advocate to espouse his cause. As the legal issues will arise for consideration, in my opinion, it will be appropriate to offer legal assistance to Respondent No. 3. Respondent No. 3 has no objection if the court recommends advocate to espouse his cause from the panel of advocates maintained by the office as amicus curie. Accordingly office is directed to appoint Advocate to espouse the cause of the respondent No. 3 within one week from today. Reply if any, to be 2 filed by Respondent No. 3 within three weeks from today. Rejoinder within one week thereafter. Matter to be placed on board on 6th July, 2005. Parties to exchange pleadings well in advance. The applicant/Plaihntiff to serve afresh respondent No. 1 and 2 intimating the next date of hearing and also to intimate them that the pleadings will have to be exchanged well in advance between the parties. (A.M. (A.M. (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J.) KHANWILKAR,J.) KHANWILKAR,J.)