IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 28TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 34142 of 2008(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. NIDHIL.M.P., THULASI, PO.NUT STREET, VADAKARA, THRISSUR. 2. MOHAMMEED HASSAN, THITHIGAE HOUSE, AOUMAGOU VILAGE, MINICOY ISLAND, LAKSHADEEP. 3. MOHAMMED SHANU.P.A., SHINY HOUSE, KONDOTTY PO., MALAPPURAM. 4. MUHAMMED HUNAISE.K.A., HADDAD NAGAR, NAVVAL PO., PALLIKERE VIA, KASARAGOD. 5. JITHY.T., SREYAS, MAYAYANGOTTU CHALIL METHAL, PERUVAYAL, CALICUT. 6. ABISHEK.G. NAIR, MELADATHU HOUSE, THIRUVAZHIYODE, PALAKKAD. 7. ANOOP.G., LAKSHMI JAYAM, SASTHANAGAR, KURUDIKKAD, PUTHUSSERRY, PALAKKAD. 8. THOMAS JOSEPH, AREEPLACKAL,CHELACHUVADU PO., CHURULI, IDUKKI, KERALA. 9. ASREEVALSAM P.S., PALISSERRY HOUSE, VELUTHUR PO., THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, THENNIPALAM, MALAPPURAM. 2. REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENNIPALAM, MALAPPURAM. 3. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENNIPALAM, MALAPPURAM. BY SC SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).34142/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 19th day of November, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioners are aggrieved by the delay in publishing the results of the revaluation of one paper in the 6th semester B.Tech Examination conducted in May, 2008. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the 6th semester B.Tech Examination. Their respective applications for revaluation are pending before the respondents. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioners in relation to the 6th semester B.Tech Examination, May-2008, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this W.P.(C).34142/2008 2 judgment provided the applications for revaluation are in order and otherwise correct. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs