1 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.2139 of 2010 Vinod Shekhar ... Petitioner versus Baban Govind Mahadik & ors. ... Respondents ... Mr. Bipin Joshi i/b R.D.Soni for the petitioner. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATED : 29th June 2010 P.C. 1. The impugned order is purely interlocutory. It does not affect the rights of the parties. It only postpones the hearing of the contention of the petitioner till the framing of the issues. As such, no interference is called for in exercise of a writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Writ Petition is accordingly rejected summarily. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to challenge this order in the superior court and therefore this order may be stayed. This order is only of a rejection of a writ petition. Hence, request is rejected. (D.G. KARNIK,J.)