v: c ^)^T^ 0 IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.&.) WRIT PETITION f S ) N0. (B^6 OF 2010 PETCTIONER: y^ 'N:4'^r .£^/ / Smt. Sarojni Devi Soni Wd/o Late. Shanker k^. Prasad Soni, aged about ^^ years, R/o Village and Post Sendhripali Tahsil Kartala Dist. Korba ( C.&.) At present R/o Village and Post Navapara (Chhal) Tahsil Dharmjaygarh bist. Raigarh (C.&.) <y- - <^: RESPONDENTS ^',.,-At^^i<?/,;-~., ^^^. ^:/f^:\ ^>^~'N^\ is/ .^2^\^\ IS^-(*^SI VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Revenue bepartment, DKS Buildin9 Raipur (C.G.) ^2. The Accountant General Account and pension pensionbada Raipur bist. Raipur (C.G.) ^3. Assistant Bhomi Sanrakshan Officer NadiGhati Project Jashpur bist Jashpur (C.G.) 4. Assistant Bhomi Sanrakshan Officer Son - Nadi 6hati Project Shadol Dist Shadol( M.P.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTCTUTCON OF INDIA. ^^mB HiGH^OURTgFCHHAHISGABHATBILASPUR WRmPS!IIONlS)_!lQ,18(^of201Q Petitioner , ' . Smt Sarojni Devl Soni Versus Bj^porident The Stete of Ghhattisgarh & others WRIT PETSTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTSTUTSON OF iNDIA (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Pr^enC- Shri K.K. Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panei Lawyerforthe State. Shri R. Pradhan, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. Heard ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 23Id of Aprit. 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that tfie case, being payment of retira! benefits matter, may be referred to fhe pension committee. 2. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 {Baipjath Mandal v. The State of Chhattjsgarh & Ot/iers) and other connected mattei^, directed the Commjttee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were Invoived. The Committee was constituted by the State Governnient, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 {Smt Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Govemment and o^e/s) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh & Others v. Baijnath Mandal and anoffiei). Thus, this petltion is squarely covered by the jydgment and order dated 31 of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 Baijna^ Mandaf (suprs) as submitted by learned counsei appearing for the parties, 3,, This petitlon is accordlngly disposed of in'the same terms i..e. the office of the Advocate Generai is directed to send the case to the .€!"5 -^ Arun Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the Committee shal! issue notice to the petrtioner and the offjcers concerned, within a further period of 15 days. The Commjttee shal! consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affordlng proper opportunsty of hearing to the petitioner. The petltioner and the officers concemed may file additional docunnients, If necessary. The entire exercise. jnciuding payment of retirat dues, if any, to the petitioner be compJQted withsn a perlod of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, 4. The petitioner shall suppiy extra copy of the petjtion to the learned counsej appearing for the respondents for foswarding the same to theCommittee. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge