IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE. ORIGINAL SIDE. ORIGINAL SIDE. SUIT NO. 1003 OF 1989 ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Memorandum of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders appearances, Court’s : orders or directions : Prothonotaries orders. : ------------------------------------------------------------ D.G.Bagwe for the plaintiffs. None for the defendants. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 22nd January 2008. DATED: 22nd January 2008. DATED: 22nd January 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that in spite of service of registered notice on the plaintiff seeking instructions to proceed with the suit, there is no response from the plaintiff. Vide order dated 27th November, 2007, plaintiff was directed to lead evidence. In view of the said order and the fact that learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff has no instruction to proceed with the suit, suit is liable to be dismissed for want of evidence since there is no evidence on behalf of plaintiff. 2. Accordingly, suit is dismissed for want of evidence with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)