IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.4796 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision:10.08.2010. Ram Narain ...Appellant Versus Ghisa Ram ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. J.P.Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. The defendant is in second appeal against the judgment and decree of the Courts below by which suit filed by the plaintiff for recovery of Rs.37,968/- has been decreed with interest. Shorn of unnecessary details, plaintiff filed suit for recovery of Rs.22,600/- towards principal amount and Rs.15,368/- as interest against the defendant on the basis of pronote and receipt duly executed by the defendant in his favour. The plaintiff proved signatures of the defendant on the pronote (Ex.P1) and receipt (Ex.P2). Thus, both the Courts below recorded a concurrent finding of fact that the defendant had taken money from the plaintiff on the basis of pronote (Ex.P1) and had executed receipt of money (Ex.P2). As a matter of fact, no question of law much-less substantial has been raised by learned counsel for the defendant/appellant as required under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and as such I do not find any merit in the present appeal and the same is hereby dismissed in limine. No costs. August 10, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE