IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1702 of 2005 MURARIPRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 10/ 06.5.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. In spite of several show causes filed on behalf of the Provident Fund authorities, this Court is not satisfied that missing credits in the provident fund account of the petitioner for the years 1976-77, 1977-78, 1980-81 and 1981-82 have been accounted for. This Court is also not satisfied that the deposits made by the petitioner in the provident fund account while serving in the State of U.P., which has been transferred by the Accountant General, Allahabad to Accountant General, Bihar has been taken into account. The aforesaid missing credits along with the deposits made by the petitioner with the Accountant General, Allahabad is to be accounted for, but same is not being done and the show cause is conveniently silent about the submissions made by the petitioner in the petition as also in the rejoinders to the show cause. In the circumstances, it is deemed appropriate to direct the petitioner to appear before the Director, Provident Fund, Bihar and to request him to furnish the charts showing deposits made by him with the Accountant General, Allahabad as also the chart showing deposits made by him when he joined the State of Bihar right from the inception till the date of retirement and thereafter if the petitioner is not satisfied with the entries made in the chart then he is at liberty to represent before the Director, Provident Fund, Bihar, which - 2 - representation should be disposed of by the Director, Provident Fund himself after perusing the deduction statements received from the controlling officer of the petitioner in the State of Bihar as also from the Accountant General, Allahabad. The entire exercise in the light of this order must be completed within two months from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order. So far the claim of the petitioner for pension in the scale of Rs. 2000/- 3800/- is concerned, the same shall be considered once he succeeds in getting the order of the State Government dated 28.7.2005 recalled or set aside. This contempt application is, accordingly, disposed of. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)