1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR FIRST APPEAL NO.808 OF 2006. LEELADHAR S/O NATHUJI MADANKAR VS MS NAMRATA D/O LEELADHAR MADANKAR & ANOTHER Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri J. J. Kataria, Advocate for Respondents no.1 & 2. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 16th DECEMBER, 2009. 1. Learned Advocate Shri J. J. Kataria appears for the respondents no.1 & 2. 2. The case was listed on earlier occasion, however, adjourned due to non availability of the Advocate for the appellant, who is absent even today. 3. The learned Advocate for the respondents states that the matter has been compromised, and has brought to the notice of the Court the purshis filed by her. 4. We had not disposed of the appeal on the last date though fact of compromise was brought to the notice of this Court by the learned Advocate for the respondent 2 on the ground that the appellant was not present, nor was his Advocate present. 5. Today the appellant had appeared in person when case was called out first time. Since he cannot be identified, he was asked to call his Advocate. 6. When the matter is called out on second occasion, the appellant is absent. Even his advocate is not present. 7. In view of the position narrated herein before, Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 8. No order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE |Muley|