IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 13329 of 2011 Date of decision November 18, 2011 Sunil Kumar ....... Petitioner Versus Indian Bank and others ........ Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. A. K. Khunger , Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that after the filing of the writ petition, the appointment order has been issued and therefore the writ petition has become infructuous and be disposed of as such. 2. As ordered. 3. The writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 18 , 2011 archana