18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV .P. 615/2009 % RG CONSULTANT P.LTD. . .... Petitioner STATE&ANR. CORAM: Through Mr. L R Goel and Mr. Rupesh Goel, Advocates versus ..... Respondents Through Mr. Pawan Bahl, APP for State Mr. S S Hora, Advocate for respondent no.2 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN ORDER 05.05.2010 Today counsel for respondent no.2 has brought a bank draft for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- favouring the petitioner company. Counsel for the respondent no.2 submits that this bank draft would be duly honoured on presentation by the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid assurance given on behalf of respondent no.2, counsel for petitioner has accepted the bank draft and says that in view of the said assurance he · withdraws this revision petition. Revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The respondent no.2 shall now be entitled to get back the bank draft for a sum of Rs.l ,50,000/-, which is stated to be lying in the custody of the trial court. MAY 05,2010 vld P.K. BHASIN,J Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified