1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Contempt Petition No. 237/2003 Ku. Shalini Gajananrao Dalal ..vs.. Dr. Sudhakarrao V. Bhalerao & 4 Ors. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: A. B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 10 th November, 2008 1. Mr. Waghmare, Advocate prays for adjournment on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard Mr.Deshpande, learned counsel for the respondents. Adjournment refused. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents submit that substantive writ petitions in the matter are pending before this Court. The case for contempt of the Court is being made out on the ground that there was improper consideration of the case of the petitioner when this Court directed the same to be considered. The fact, however, remains that the said issue is pending before this Court in substantive writ petitions at the instance of the petitioner. I 2 find that no case for contempt of this Court is made out. The petition is therefore, dismissed with liberty to approach this Court after decision on merits in the pending substantive writ petitions. No order as to costs. JUDGE kahale