IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 2135 of 2005. Date of Decision: 31st March, 2009. Smt. Gurminder Kaur Petitioner through None Versus Smt. Rajinder Kaur Respondent through Mr. B.S.Jaswal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) This Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 22.3.2005 passed by learned Civil Judge [Junior Division], Jalandhar whereby the petitioner has been directed to restore the possession of the house in dispute to the respondent. While issuing notice of motion, restoration of possession was ordered to be stayed vide order dated 12.4.2005. Thereafter, this revision petition was admitted on 30.10.2006 and the interim order aforesaid was made absolute. The impugned order emanates from a civil suit which was filed in the year 2004. There is every likelihood that the civil suit, by now, might have been decided. Having heard learned counsel for the respondent against whom the interim order is operating from last about four years, I am of the considered view that the rival contentions need not be gone into. The revision petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction that the interim order as granted by this Court shall continue to operate till the civil suit is decided, if still pending. Nothing said in the impugned order as also this order shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. Disposed of. March 31, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE