^ ) 6V/- SIHGi (^ S.B. fService Matter) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fCHHATnSGARH) WRIT PETITION N0. Ss^r) /2006. PETITIONER: Rali Mohamtnad Kureshi, son of Nabi Mohammad Kuereshi, aged about 48 years, Assistant Teacher, Priinary f'"- /^••' School Bendarchua, Premises Devkar, .-•^'-n^'' ..••' ...••'' Bemetara, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ^-'Q.'^"...-••'" -^ ..•-•"^•:\^-"' T <&°•" t:^ "y VERSUS Respondents / ^"y / ^y ^v Y A: <»-> o- 1. State of Chhatdsgarh, Through The Secretary School Educadon Department Ministiy D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, "Chhattisgarh. 2. Director of School Mucation Office," D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. The District Education Officer, Beinetara,. Through Block Development Education Officer, Saja, Durg, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE ^ .•s>v cf CONSTrrUTION OKINDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRTT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI. PROHIBITION AND FOR THE OTHER SIMILAR WRIT OR WRITS. ORDER OR ORDERS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. XI-HC-78 *II*IMI ai*nch 3^'^TORTO, »Tn^'l<»,Iqclltfy .4Jf..'^o.-..?.^//£<.CT^ 200 3n^?riraq? (i^fg^ir) sn^rw R-fi+ (rar'a?R?TshH BTdTW flfgcT sn^T ~732005T^ Heord Shri O.P. Sahu, counse) Shri Sumesh Beycy, 6.A. for By this petition, the petitione|i to grant two advance increments to the B. Ed. examination on his own The case of the petitioner[ Teacher on 17.2.1989 vide 24-12-1998 issued by erstwhile Stalji passed the B.Ed. examination beforj increments and the teachers who 22.10.1964 on their own expenses ar{ Other similarly situated persons Administrative Tribunal. Bench at them and based on that they have petitioner had passed B. Ed. vide Annexure P-5 and inspite of rej treatment is not being given to him. Therefore, lear-ned counsell petitioner moy be allowed to md<e| No.3 ond in turn, he be directed to which Shr>i Bcy<y, learned 6ovt. Advo| Havina heard learned counsel and circumstances of the case, the case, the petitionar is allowied tcj til<<tt-l<fl-1 >1|t1clTiFte^t'<Rl(-4l(. ^iSrf^TTSfl^T L..: f<D the for the petitioner'. respondents, on advance copy. has proyed that respondents be directed he petitioner, as the petitioner has passed exj^enses. Ann4xure examinitrtion is that he was appointed as Assistant P-3. As per Instructions dated 1|e of M.P. the Assistant Teachers who have 22.10.1964 are entitled for two advance |iave pasged the B.Ed. examinatjon crfter also entitled for two advance increments. moved an application before the State f|'aipur, the Tribunal has 9ranted relief to t^een granted two advance increments. The on his own expenses in the year 1994 [jresentation made by the petitioner similar hd/e withbut for the petitioner subm'rts that the a detaited repr'esentation to respondent tlecide the same in accordance with law, to i|;ate for the State has no objection. ffor the parties, having regard to the focts expressing any opinion on the merit of make a detailed r'epresentation along with P.T.O. 3KC1-t»t--liSSI3TS-WVr XI-HC-78 3^'^IT2lRT;r^ »T}1u<is, (c|dlti^<, *11HCTT $h*1|cb ^200 3TT^?T'-la'ti ('i^^'t.fl') 3Ti^5fr?irR-ficb crav'sn^T giiiR; Roshan '^ wiiw Hfscr sn^T -z' hls copy ot this petition raising all period of 15 doys fr-om today an<| examine the cose of the petition^r petitioner- in this petition ond in tl^ reaches to the conctusion that sin) benefit of two advance increments t grant of two advance increments pass orders wfithin a per-iod of 3 moi^ths With the direction aforesaidl Parties ore entitled for certit 01 tii<if<i<fl-i WRrf ff fs^S <(ai<•(;!< ^isri^iTan^r grievances to respondent No.3 within a in turn, respondent No.3 is directed to in the light of averments made by the e representation also. If respondent No.3 ilarly situoted persons hove been granted md the petitioner's case is also covered for the basis of ffovernment's order, then to from today, in accordance with law. the petition stands disposed of. fied copy of this order. Sd<- -.C. BireQoo judge P.T.O.