In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Date of decision: 26.3. 2009 CRM-M No. 3415 of 2009 Anand @ Bholu ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent CRM-M No. 4243 of 2009 Sombir @ Target ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.Rakesh Nehra, Advocate and Mr.Parminder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Sidharth Sarup, AAG, Haryana. **** SABINA, J. This order shall dispose of the above said two petitions. CRM-M No.3415 of 2009 has been filed by Anand @ Bholu under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ('Cr.P.C.' for short) read with Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act and CRM- M No.4243 of 2009 has been filed by Sombir @ Target under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 231 dated 31.7.2008 under Sections 395/397 of the Indian Penal Code, and CRM-M No. 3415 of 2009 -2- Section 25 of the Arms Act registered at Police Station Sadar Dadri, District Bhiwani. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the material witnesses had not supported the prosecution case during trial. The petitioners are in custody since 3.10.2008. Petitioner Anand @ Bholu was juvenile at the time of alleged occurrence. Learned State counsel, on the other hand, has opposed these petitions. Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, these petitions are allowed. The petitioners are ordered to be admitted to bail subject to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhiwani. (SABINA) JUDGE March 26, 2009 anita