IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5967 of 2010 JAGDISH MAHTO, SON OF LATE RAGHO MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17/02/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 272, 273, 290 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(A) of the Excise Act. On earlier occasion, by an order dated 29.10.2009, the petitioner had been refused bail with liberty to renew the same after having remained in custody for six months in view of his earlier antecedents. The said period of custody, the petitioner has completed. In view of the above mentioned facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Distt. Patna, in connection with Ghoswari, P.S. Case No. 48 of 2009 (G.R. No. 939 of 2009) subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release 2 in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)