IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14633 of 2011 Dr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad Singh S/O Late Rajendra Prasad Singh R/O Flat No.- 401, Gangotri Apartment, Exhibition Road, P.S.- Gandhi Maidan, Distt.- Patna. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through Principle Secretary Health Department Govt. Of Bihar, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna 2. The Joint Secretary, Health Department, Govt. Of Bihar, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna 3. Deputy Secretary, Health Department, Govt. Of Bihar, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna. 4. Director In Chief, Health Department, Govt. Of Bihar, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna. 5. Civil Surgeon Cum Chief Medical Officer, Patna. 6. Accountant General Bihar Patna, R-Block, Patna. ---------------------------------- 2 8/9/2011 Heard Sri Amrendra Narayan Rai , learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Swapnil Kumar Singh, learned AC to Additional Advocate General No. 2, who appears on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 5/State of Bihar and Sri Prabhat Ranjan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No. 6/Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. The petitioner, who retired as ‘Civil Surgeon, Patna’ on 31/12/2010 has approached this court with a prayer to direct the respondents to clear all his retiral dues. It appears from ‘Annexure -6/a’ to the writ petition that earlier a departmental proceeding was pending against him. However, the petitioner was discharged from the departmental proceeding. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits 2 that the petitioner, after retirement, for the relief sought for in the present writ petition, has filed representation before respondent no. 1/ Principle Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar and same is still pending. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to respondents to take decision on his representation. In view of stand taken by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no. 1/Principle Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, the courts expects that respondent no. 1 will examine the same in its right perspective and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. If the respondent no. 1 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, the respondent no. 1 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within two months from the date of filing of such representation. The respondent no. 6/Accountant General, Bihar, Patna is required to issue 3 authorization within four weeks from the date of receipt of sanction order from the state authority. It goes without saying that the petitioner shall be entitled to get admissible statutory interest. With above observation and direction the writ petition stands disposed of. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)