IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-34377 of 2011 Date of decision : December 06, 2011 Harjit Singh ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab ....Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. Vinod K. Kataria, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Shailesh Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) Accused Harjit Singh has filed this petition for anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 112 dated 19.2.2011, under sections 420,120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Division No. 1, Ludhiana. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. According to the prosecution version, the petitioner in connivance with bank officials cheated the bank by taking loan on the basis of title deed of property but by showing different property while taking loan. The petitioner has also not repaid the loan. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner is trying to repay the loan. However, there is serious allegations against the petitioner that he obtained loan by fraud by showing one property and Criminal Misc. No. M-34377 of 2011 -2- by giving title deed of the different property. In addition to it, there is also another case of the same nature against the petitioner having obtained loan from a different bank. In view of the aforesaid, the petitioner does not deserve the concession of anticipatory bail. Dismissed without meaning to express any opinion on merits of the case. ( L.N. Mittal ) December 06, 2011 Judge 'dalbir'