'ei- IH THE ST&TE a©M®5.S3-Bi»ISfE,TRIBOK _ S_ <3&BafcPUR. o.a, so.__^_u')Li___/^ ^PPKCCifflT t S.No Shukla, •&ssistant Prejeet" DepaEtinent of Agricalture, Bilaigarfa» Distriet B.aiPUR. ^^^ •vs aESPOSIDBHTS.t l. State of H.P. throagh Secretary, Department of agricultare BHOP&L. 2. Birector of agricul-bure / Kadhya Pradesh« Vindhyaachal Bhavan., BHOPAL . BET'AILS OF THE /SPPLICA.TIQN 1, Particalars of Vhe order against_wh:i.ch tbe application is inade s~ s 23 ^' .terit HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPLICANT WRIT PETmON (S) No. 681 of2005 S.N. Shukla. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofM.P. & another. SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri. J. Present: None for the petitioner. Snrt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 23" day of September, 2009) The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In view ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want ofprosecution. Registr^' is directed to send a copy offhis order to the petitioner, forthwith. ish K. Judge 'yity.fciUfiiffiitiE'"':