IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2011 / 20TH JYAISHTA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 4311 of 2011() ----------------------------- CRL.M.P.3578/2011 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE, KODUNGALLUR CRIME NO. 666/2011 of KODUNGALLUR POLICE STATION .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 AND 2:- --------------------------------------- 1. ABDUL MUTHILIB @ MUTHILIB,AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.MUHAMMADALI,ARAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE,AZHIKODE VILLAGE,MENON BAZAR DESOM,KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. SHANOJ,AGED 22 YEARS,S/O.MUHAMMADALI, AYYARIL HOUSE,AZHIKODE VILLAGE,PUTHENPALLI DESOM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK,THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU SRI.K.A.NOUSHAD SRI.P.G.PRAMOD RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:- ---------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY SUB- INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KODUNGALLUR POLICE STATION, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682 031. ADV. SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. .................................................... Bail Application No. 4311 of 2011 ..................................................... Dated this the 10th day of June, 2011. ORDER Petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.666 of 2011 of Kodungallur Police Station, Thrissur for an offence punishable under Section 420 I.P.C., seek their enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 22.04.2011. The petitioners were arrested on 31.05.2011. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioners, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioners are released on bail, they will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. sd/- V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv //True Copy// P.A to Judge.