IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.497 of 2008 MADAN PRASAD Versus SMT. INDU DEVI ----------- 3 22.09.2008 Heard counsel for the parties. The counsel for the petitioner at the out set with reference to the earlier order of the court dated 16.9.2008 had submitted that the petitioner was not in a position to pay consolidated amount by way of one time settlement. Heard counsel for the petitioner on merits. This Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order which not only takes into consideration, the materials on record but also has taken into account the value of so called of settlement before Kalingpong Society . As a matter of fact, this aspect of the matter was already gone into by this Court in the earlier order dated 11.10.2006 passed in Cr. Misc. Case No. 29756 of 2006 and Cr. Misc. Case No. 11255 of 2006 while considering the prayer for bail of the petitioner. The Court below in the light of the aforementioned observations made in the order dated 11.10.2006 has passed a reasoned order which cannot be said to be either perverse or illegal in any manner. Therefore, this Court would dismiss this Civil Revision application with the direction to the Court below to proceed immediately in the pending maintenance case and pass an order as early as possible but in no event later than six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)