CWP No.2333 of 2008. 17.11.2008. Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. B.C. Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.3. The learned counsel for the petitioner indicated that earlier the petitioner-College was being governed by 1994 Rules and was getting grant-in-aid to the extent of 95%. Now the petitioner-College is being governed by the new set of Rules dated 16th March, 2008. However, there is a power of relaxation vested with the Government under Clause 13 of the Rules. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already made a representation to the authority concerned for relaxation so as they may get more grant-in-aid. It has been prayed that a direction be issued to the authority concerned to dispose of the representation of the petitioner. This is an innocuous prayer. Accordingly, the learned Advocate General has no objection to the same. The interest of justice will suffice if the representation of the petitioner is considered and disposed of. Accordingly, we direct the authority concerned to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner in light of the Himachal Pradesh Grant-in-aid to non-Government Colleges Rules, 2008 expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks. Thereafter, the consequences to follow. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of and so also the pending application. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. 17th November, 2008. (Kuldip Singh), J. (tr)