IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.38-MA of 2010 Date of Decision: May 11, 2010 Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS Mohinder Singh .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Ashish Grover, Advocate, for the applicant. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) The application has been filed under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. praying for leave to appeal against acquittal. Crl. Misc. Appl. No.38-MA of 2010 [2] The respondent has been acquitted vide Judgment dated 8.7.2009 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jalandhar on the ground that there was no evidence to sufficiently prove that colony had been carved out. It has been found by the Trial Court that site plan Exh.C-9 filed by the complainant does not correspond with site plan Exh.C-7 i.e. Shajra Aks, produced by CW-3, Santokh Singh, Patwari. Learned counsel for the applicant has not been able to show to this Court even at this stage that the area in which allegedly the colony had been carved out, had been notified as area where no colony could be carved out. In view of the above, no ground for grant of leave to appeal against acquittal is made out. The application is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) May 11, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?