IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 2 of 2011 (M/B) Thakurji Sri Sri Krishna Trust ….…… Petitioner. Versus Gram Sabha of Kunja and others ………. Respondents Mr. P. Niroop, Advocate with Mr. Siddhartha Sah, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Standing Counsel for the State / respondent No. 6. Date of Judgment: 26.08.2011 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. BARIN GHOSH, C.J. (ORAL) In view of what has happened after the writ petition was filed, namely, the Panchayat concerned has stopped construction of the road in question, the purpose of the present writ petition has served. 2. Learned counsel for the villagers, comprising the Panchayat, has submitted that the villagers need better road facility. If that be so, the villagers as well as their Panchayat may approach the State Government and impress upon the State Government the requirement of improved road for the villagers. 3. With the observation as above, we dispose of the writ petition. (V.K. Bist, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 26.08.2011 26.08.2011 Amit