IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 660 OF 2009 SHRI ATCHUT UPENDRA RAIKAR ... Petitioner Versus ANAND UPENDRA RAIKAR 10 ORS. ... Respondent Mr. Nitin Sardessai, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 15th October, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard Shri Sardessai on behalf of the Petitioner. 2. Petitioner is the plaintiff in the Civil Suit filed by him. Plaintiff had filed an application dated 16.6.2009 for production of certain balance sheet for the period of above 12 years beginning from the year 1993-94 which according to the plaintiff were in possession of the firm, last mentioned defendant. The stand taken by the defendant was that the said balance sheet were in the custody of Income Tax Department. Since the plaintiff has remedy to produce the said balance sheet from the Income Tax Department, I am not inclined to entertain this petition at this stage. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the reply filed by the defendants was not supported by an affidavit. It is seen that this objection was not taken before the Trial Court, and, need not be considered by this Court in extra ordinary jurisdiction. Consequently, this petition is disposed of. N. A. BRITTO, J. at*