^ a-. Singte Bench IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.Gl W.P. fS) N0. SQ^ 4 /2011 PETITIONER ^•^ow^^ ..•••••l^-'C^V..^'"' ^.--•^^ •<^y^- ,^ ^^^ ^6U ^•••"<" RESPONDENTS : Kushal Prasad Kaushik, aged about 51 years, S/o Shri Balaram Kaushik, Upper Division Teacher, Government Higher Secondary School, Tarbahar, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS :!.". State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. ^ Director, Public Instructions, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Block Bilha, Distt.Bilaspur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA iiI@HLCOURT Qr CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR SB : HON'BLB MR. JUSTECS PiRJITWKER DIWAKEB PBTITIONSR RBSPQNDBNTS W.P.fSl.NO. 3864/2011 Kushal Prasad Kaushik versus State of C.G. & Qthers ^»* Shri K.S.Pawar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri P^avcen Das»E)y. G. A. for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDBSl ABTICI,1? 826 OF THE GSB^SSSSSS^J^ INDIA ORDBR (20.07.2011) By this petitiony the petitioner hae prayed for a direction to fche respondents to consider the case of the petitioner and provide benefit of FR 22 (D) of the Chhattisgarh Fundamental RuleSy for grant of increments aa provided under the rules and also to pay arrears from the date when it became due. At the very outset^ counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the identical matter has already been considered and deoided by this Court vide order dated 27.3.2008 in W.P,(S) No. 4991/2006 and the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the said decision. Counsel appearing for the State does not dispute that the case of the petitioner is squarefy covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P*(S) No. 4991/2006. He further submits that if the petitioner ffles fresh representation before the concerned authorities for the reliefs, which he has claimed by way of this petition^ the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law^ subject to verification of facts. Por the foregoing reasons, the instajat petition m disposed of with tiberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation before the respondent authorities raising all hia grievances raised in this petition and on such representation being made, the respondent authorities shall consider and decide the same in accordance ^ith law cn its own merits^ within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge