IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI FRIDAY, THE 28TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 7TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 20736 of 2008(R) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SAJAN.P.VARGHESE, S/O.THOMAS VARGHESE, PARAYIL HOUSE, PUTTUMANOOR KARA, PUTHENCRUZ VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUTHENCRUZ, ERNAKULAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUTHENCRUZ, ERNAKULAM. 3. S.NARAYANAN PILLAI, S/O.SREEDHARAN PILLAI, MOKAYIL HOUSE (ASWATHI), CLINT ROAD, KUZHIKADU, P.O.AMBALAMEDU, ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE FOR R3 GOVT.PLEADER, SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.20736/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1(A): COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.835/1983 IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P1(B): COPY OF PATTA NO.18/1978. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT.8.10.2007 IN S.A.NO.601/1994 BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S.NO.154/08 BEFORE MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT IN O.S.NO.154/08. RESPONDENT'S EXTS: EXT.R3(a): COPY OF THE PATTA NO.33/78 ISSUED BY THE TAHSILDAR, LAND ASSIGNMENT, PERUMBAVOOR. EXT.R3(b): COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN A.S.NO.132/1991 OF 1ST ADDITIONAL SUB JUDGE, ERNAKULAM, DT.31.5.1993. EXT.R3(c): COPY OF THE COMPLAINT BEFORE THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUTHENCRUZ DT.26.6.2008. EXT.R3(d): COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUTHENCRUZ. //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.20736 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of November, 2008 J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~~~~~ Balakrishnan Nair, J. The petitioner has approached this Court, alleging that the respondents 1 and 2 are interfering in a civil dispute between him and the 3rd respondent. 2. The learned Government Pleader, upon instructions, submitted that the 3rd respondent has filed a complaint before the 2nd respondent, alleging that the petitioner is trespassing into the property in his possession. To enquire into that complaint, the petitioner was called. But, he did not appear. He further submitted that, the police have no intention to interfere in the civil dispute. This submission is recored and the writ petition is closed. (K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) ps