1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 360 OF 2006 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. FEBRUARY 08, 2007. Heard Shri Mohokar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Meghe, learned counsel for the respondent. Shri Mohokar, learned counsel argues that the respondent was appointed under Employment Guarantee Scheme and was working only on EGS work. He has invited attention to discussion in this respect as contained in para 11 of the judgment of the Labour Court. Shri Meghe, learned counsel for the respondent invites attention to discussion undertaken by the Industrial Court also in para 11 and also the evidence on record, particularly cross examination of witness of the petitioner. The said cross examination clearly shows that the present respondent was directly appointed by the petitioner and his 2 name was not forwarded by the Tahsildar or by the Collector. In these circumstances, the only contention raised before this Court that respondent was EGS employee cannot be accepted. Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.