IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT APPEAL NO : 885 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 22/01/2003 in WP No. 721 OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1.T. Padma w/o Sundara Murthy, R/o Opp: Laxminarasimha Swamy Temple, Nacharam village, Wargal Mandal, Medak District. 2. Sri R. Ramulu, S/o Sailu, R/o Opp: Laxminarasimha Swamy Temple, Nacharam village, Wargal Mandal, Medak District. ..... APPELLANTS AND 1. The Commissioner of Endowment, Government of A.P., Hyderabad. 2. The Executive Officer, Laxminarasimha Swamy Temple,Nacharam, Wargal, Medak District. 3. The Sub-Registrar , Gajwel, Medak District. 4. Smt. Padari P. Laxmi, W/o Mallaiah Goud, r/o Nacharam, Wargal Mandal, Medak District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants:Mr.MACHERLA MOHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent 1 to 3: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for Respondent No.4: None appeared. The Court made the following : ORAL JUDGMENT: (per The Honourable Sri Devinder Gupta, the Chief Justice) Appeal earlier was disposed of on 21.6.2004, which was restored by order passed in WAMP No. 2012 of 2004 on 5.8.2004. Today also, when the case is called, nobody is present on behalf of the appellants. It appears that appellants are no more interested in prosecuting the appeal. Moreover, the Writ Petition filed by the appellants questioning the proceedings dated: 13.11.2003 issued by the Commissioner of Endowment, was dismissed by the order impugned herein. By the said proceedings, the Executive Officer of the temple was permitted to enter into compromise by collection of Rs.40/- per sq. yard by the applicant registering the land by the Executive Officer, who was permitted to withdraw the cases. The learned Single Judge observed that nothing prevents the petitioners-appellants to approach the temple for appropriate orders for allotment of land other than the land, which is purchased by the fourth respondent. We do not see any ground to interfere with the said order. The Appeal, therefore, is dismissed. No costs. Sd/- P.VANA KUMARI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //True Copy// Section officer To 1. The Commissioner of Endowment, Government of A.P., Hyderabad. 2. The Executive Officer, Laxminarasimha Swamy Temple,Nacharam, Wargal, Medak District. 3. The Sub-Registrar, Gajwel, Medak District. 4. Two CCs to Govt. Pleader for Endowments, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (OUT). 5. Two CD copies. 6. One cc to Mr.Kondaveeti Ravi, Advocate TRk HIGH COURT DATED: 25.8.2004 ORDER: WA.NO. 885 OF 2004 DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS