IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 209 OF 2009 SHRI. SHANTARAM KRISHNA GAUDO AND 6 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus M/S. MAYUR MINERALS THROUGH PARTNER YESHWANT B. DESSAI ... Respondent Mr. V. A. Lawande, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. J.P. Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the Respondent. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 2nd April, 2009 P.C.: Heard. This Writ Petition is directed against 2 consent orders passed by the trial Court dated 21/03/2009 and 24/03/2009 and the contention now raised, and of course with the change of advocate, is that the said orders were obtained in collusion with the advocate of the applicants. 2. Shri Mulgaonkar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that an application for recall of the said orders have been made by the present petitioners and the same is kept for hearing on 4/04/2009. Shri Lawande, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has contended that orders obtained by fraud can be corrected by this Court even in supervisory jurisdiction and, in that context, has placed reliance on the case of The Peoples Education Society & Ors. V/s. Dr. Manohar Shivappa Modi & Ors. (2009 (1) ALL MR 536). 3. Considering that the said orders were passed by consent and further considering that an application for recall of the same is pending before the trial Court, I am not inclined to entertain this petition at this stage. I have no doubt in my mind that the learned trial Court will consider the said application filed by the present petitioners for recall of impugned orders on its own merits and considering the nature of the orders passed, as expeditiously as possible. 4. With the above observations, the petition is disposed of. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH