IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.10345 of 2011 Jatinder Kumar Prashar ...Petitioner Versus Chandigarh Housing Board, Sector 9, Chandigarh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Raman Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Says that the agency in such like cases where attorney is coupled with interest would not lapse on the death of the person concerned. Despite having served legal notice in this regard, nothing is being done. The petitioner had earlier approached this court, but the writ petition was dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue his legal notice. The legal notice served by the petitioner has not been decided. Without going into the merits of the controversy, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the legal notice served by the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. June 02, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE