IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18080 of 2011 1. Nand Lal Yadav, S/O Sri Ram Bachan Yadav, resident of Village- Jayjor, P.O. Jayjor, P.S. Aandar, District- Siwan. 2. Santosh Kr. Dubey, S/O Sri Chandram Dubey, Resident of Village- Parhiya, P.O. Khujwan, P.S. Raghunathpur, District- Siwan. 3. Lakshman Yadav, S/O Sri Ram Deo Yadav, Resident of Village- Parari Lakshi Ram, P.O. Tiyay, P.S. Aandar, District- Siwan. 4. Kr Gautam Singh, S/O Sri Indrajit Singh, Resident of Village+ P.O. Babura, P.S. Barhara, District- Bhojpur (Ara) Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Deputy Inspector General, (Human Right, Bihar, Patna) 4. The Inspector General, (Bihar Military Police), Bihar, Patna. 5. The Chairman, Central Requirement Board-cum- Additional Inspector General S.C.R.B., Bihar, Patna. 6. The Chairman, Champaran Range Board, Motihari. 7. The Chairman, Tribut Range Board No. 1, Muzaffarpur. 8. The Chairman, Saran Range Board, Chapra. 9. The Chairman, Shahabad Range Board no. 1, Bhojpur. 10. The Chairman, Shahabad Range Board no. 2, Bhojpur. ---------------------------------- 2. 15.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned A.C. to G.P. 24 for the respondents. The petitioners have moved this Court for a direction to appoint them on the post of constables in terms of advertisement no. 1 of 2004. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of a Division Bench Judgment of this Court in L.P.A. No. 831 of 2009 reported in 2011 (3) PLJR 575 certain directions have been given with regard to 2 persons who are similarly situated to the petitioners. In view of the above, he submits that this writ petition may also be disposed off in light of the said order passed in L.P.A. No. 831 of 2009. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents on the other hand submits that the foundational facts which may indicate that the petitioners are similarly situated have not been mentioned in the writ petition and in that view of the matter, he prays that this Court may dispose off the matter but with the rider that the authorities may verify as to whether the petitioners are similarly situated to the case of the persons in L.P.A. No. 831 of 2009 and its analogous cases. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the writ petition stands disposed off in terms of the order dated 28.6.2011 passed in L.P.A. No. 831 of 2009. The authorities would verify with regard to the similarity of the cases of the present petitioners with those of L.P.A. No. 831 of 2009 and its analogous cases and if found similar the same exercise would be carried out in the case of the petitioners also. With the aforementioned directions the writ petition stands disposed off. Anand Kr. ( Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)