IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.329 OF 2010 DATED:01.6.2010 Between: M/s. Arihant Phenochem, a registered partnership firm, Plot No.13, IDA Mankhal, Maheshwaram Mandal Ranga Reddy District, Through its partner Mithun Kumar S/o. Nem Kumar Jain R/o. 16-11-15/15, Saleem Nagar Colony, Malakpet, Hyderabad … Appellant And Director of Agricultural Market Committee, (Director of Marketing) A.P., Basheerbagh, Hyderabad and another … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.329 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Nisar Ahmad Kakru) To appreciate the controversy raised in this appeal, it would be appropriate to reproduce the relief claimed by the petitioner in the writ petition. “…to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent detaining the lorry No.MH 22/L-32 containing Toor of 169.25 quintals demanding market fee of Rs.8,124/- on 9.4.2010 as per Notice dt.9.4.2010 and collecting the said amount under receipt No.6740 from Book No.135, dt.9.4.2010 as arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction and consequently be pleased to pass suitable order in the nature of direction to the respondent to return the amount of Rs.8,124/- collected and under receipt No.6740 from Book No.135, dt.9.4.2010 to the petitioner and also to pay damages of Rs.50,000/- to the petitioner for causing harassment and mental agony by the respondent No.2.” The learned single Judge directed the respondents to consider the writ petitioner’s representation and refund the amount subject to the satisfaction that the Toor was purchased in Maharashtra and the same was being transported into Andhra Pradesh. In our opinion, no other relief could be possible. Disposed of. SANJAY KUMAR, J NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ 01-6-2010 B. Narsinga Rao