IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22052 of 2010 TANIK SINGH @ VINAY SINGH . S/o Late Arjun Singh resident of village Narottampur P.S. Suryagarha (Kajra) Dist.Lakhisarai Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR Opp. Party ----------- 02/ 14.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged in the FIR that on the order of petitioner offence was committed but after investigation the police found the case false against the petitioner and was not sent up for trial but subsequently differing with the final form, learned Magistrate took cognizance. Learned counsel for the informant does not controvert the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that offence was committed on the order of the petitioner. Considering the fact that the police found the case false against the petitioner but differing with the final form the learned Magistrate took cognizance, let the petitioner in the event of arrest/ surrender within twelve weeks from today be released on bail in connection with Suryagraha P.S. Case no. 334 of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000-/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. shahid (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J))