IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3860 OF 2009 IN APPEAL (LODG) NO.557 OF 2009 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.318 OF 2008 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2154 OF 2008 AND APPEAL (LODG) NO.557 OF 2009 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.318 OF 2008 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2154 OF 2008 Shalini Sangeeta Developers Pvt.Ltd. ...Appellant vs. Dhanraj Sumermal Khimavat. ...Respondent --- Mr.Rajesh N.Kachare, for Appellant. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA,JJ. DATED: 9th June, 2010 P.C.: 1. Though the delay is only of 25 days, in our opinion, the delay cannot be condoned, considering the nature of the order that is made by the learned Single Judge. The claim made in the summary suit is for money decree on account of municipal taxes, water charges and other charges. Perusal of order of the learned Single Judge shows that the learned Single Judge had directed the plaintiff to produce the bills on the basis of which the amount was demanded. But the plaintiff failed to produce the bill. In such a situation, therefore, in our opinion, no useful purpose will be served by condoning the delay. The Notice of motion and the appeal are disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA,J.) ...