THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.R.P.No. 5225 of 2010 O R D E R: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 23.07.2010 in I.A. No. 586 of 2010 in O.S. No. 865 of 2003, on the file of the Court of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District. The respondent herein is the plaintiff in the suit filed for the relief of perpetual injunction. He also filed I.A.No. 1727 of 2003 and it was allowed. The appeal C.M.A.No. 177 of 2003 filed there against by the petitioners herein was allowed. During the pendency of the suit, the respondent was dispossessed from the suit schedule property on 26.06.2005. Therefore, he filed I.A.No. 3264 of 2005 under Section 144 C.P.C. and it was dismissed by holding that the petitioners are in physical possession of the suit schedule property. Therefore, the respondent filed the present I.A. seeking amendment of the prayer in the suit from perpetual injunction to that of declaration and recovery of possession and for the consequential amendments. The learned II Additional Junior Civil Judge, allowed the said I.A. permitting the respondent herein to amend the plaint to include the relief of declaration and recovery of possession. Aggrieved by the said order, the defendants in the suit filed the present Civil Revision Petition. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the petitioners object the observations made by the learned Judge in his order, at paragraph 9, to the following effect “ So, it is crystal clear that the petitioner was in possession of suit schedule property by the time of I.A.No. 1727 of 2003 and C.M.A.No. 177 of 2003 and as per the petitioner, he was dispossessed on 26.06.2005.” He further contends that in case the present amendment is allowed, the issue of limitation has also to be considered. These two objections can be taken care by ordering deletion of the above said observation made by the learned Judge. The same is accordingly deleted and the petitioners are at liberty to raise the issue of limitation 0in their additional written statement and the main suit can be disposed of by the trial Court, uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. --------------------- (N.V. RAMANA, J) 3rd December 2010 ksld