«H; ‘3‘: j WRIT pETITION No./6<a\7 . OF 1997. " Mi % Beekay PIOJ'ect Engineering Manager, Corporation, ‘ _ r _ , ‘ and ‘another P ¥ " ”a PETITIONERS; ‘ ‘ ‘ Vso c ‘St‘ate Bench a1; Industrial Raipur &. Court, others or” r RESPONDENTS. ‘ J7 WRIT pETITION [MDER ARTICLE 226 227° OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. “ ‘c 1° Particulars of the Petitionetrs :- ‘-\ *M“ 1- Projeczt Manager, ’ Beekay‘ 45/47, Engineering Industrial Estate, Corporation, Bhilai— 490026° Distt. Durg (M.p.) ‘ Dal'lirajhara. Beekay Engineerg‘mg Corporation, 2- The General Manager, . * 13.0. Dallirajhara, Distt.Durg.(M.g._). >. 2. Particulars of the Respondents :— 1; state Industrial Court, M.P° Bench at Raipurp Raipurn (M.P.) 2- Ketu Ram son o‘f‘, Budhrama 3—Bhikha Lal Patel son of Ram Singh Pat/el. 4— Anurani son of Jharum Ram.- ' 5— Suban Lal son of; Premlal. 6- Jeevanlal son of Firtu Ram. 7- Jeevanlal ‘son of Hinsaram. 8— Jtiraig Sai son of Sadarama. 9— Dev Lal son of Keshav Ram. 1‘0- Ramadhin son of Halalkhor. 11,— Kartik Ram, son of Lachhan Ram. 1.2- Deval Singh son’ofxtSuhhlal. 13— Gayaram son of Sundarlala 14- Nemi Chand son of ?remlal¢ K i r 15- Jugbai’ wife of' Bisambar. > ,contd'L..2..'. 7 Respondent Nos. Metal & Engineer Mazdoor Sabha Eh P.O. Khursipar, 2 to 29 are C/O ing Workers Union, awan, Nandini Roado Bhilai Histrict Durg (M.P.) Metal & Engineering Workers Union, 30- General Secretary, Mazdoor Sabha Bhawan, ‘Nandini Road, 13°00 Khursipar, Bhilai, Distt. Durg.(M.P.) 31- Shri Mohan Singh, Near Blue Star Petrol Balod Road, P.O. Dalli Distt. Burg.(M.P.). Pump. — Rajhara. _2_ 18_ Kismat Bai wife of Siyara'mo 19— Binda Bai wife of Prabhu Ram. 20— Usha Bai wife of Shukla Ram. 21-— Maina Bai Wife of Dayaram. 22- Kamla Bai wife of Lakhahlal. ’23- Posan Bai wife of Tukaram. 24- Uma Bai wife of Manglu Ram. 25- Ram Nath son of Dhanow Ram. 26— ’Makh\an Ram wife of Dbudhu Ram. 27— Rajmal son 0f §hola Singh. 28- Dhanraj son of Chaituram. 29— Debuvram HIGH COURT OF CHHA’I'I‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR ‘ z 7 If Pemion No. 1089 of 199 Project Managef, Beekay Engineering Petitioners 8r. another Versus Respondents SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. mihotri, J State Industrial Court 8n others Shn' Indra Sen Sahu, Advocate for the petitioners. ‘ Shii P.S. Koshy, Advocate for the respondents No. 2 to 13. ORAL ORDER ( 22nd June, 2006) Learned counsel appearing fo rs firm to its ents No. the petition, to etition is accordingly dismissed as Withdrawn: No order The following order of the Coult was passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. r the petitioners submits on the basis of the fax message dated 19.6.2006 send by the petitione Advocate, Shri D.C. rHenry, that the petitioners does not want to press which learned counsel appearing for the respond 2 to 13 has no objection. The writ p as to costs. ' \ ”‘3“ ‘I