1 CAG-5373.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5373 OF 2010 Dr. Wilfried Aulbur & Ors. .... Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent WITH CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO.640 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5373 OF 2010 Uwe Jarosch .... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent AND CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO.19 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5373 OF 2010 Dr. Wilfried Aulbur .... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent S/Shri Shirish Gupte, Senior Counsel with A.P. Mundargi, Senior Counsel i/b Tejas Dande for the Applicant. Shri Y.M. Nakhawa, APP, for the State. 2 CAG-5373.10 CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JANUARY 21, 2011 P.C: 1. The Head, Legal Affairs & Company Secretary has filed an affidavit pursuant to the order dated 14-1-2011 stating that the Board has passed a Resolution stating that the Minutes of Meeting dated 5-10-2009, at pages 129 to 131 of the compilation, would not be pressed by the Company in any civil proceedings against the original complainant. In view of this, it is not clear as to why the applicants' being in custody would be necessary for any further investigation, in spite of report of the hand-writing expert which shows that the signature of Rakhi Nagpal is not made by her. The police can of course go ahead with their investigation and find out who has forged the signature of Rakhi Nagpal. In view of this, the interim order passed on 1-12-2010 is confirmed with the modification that if the applicants have to travel abroad, they would approach the competent Magistrate, submit their travel programme and then leave the country after seeking permission from the learned Magistrate. 3 CAG-5373.10 2. This order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge-sheeted, the applicants may furnish fresh bond before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court, dated 2-12-2010, delivered in Criminal Appeal No.2271 of 2010, arising out of SLP (Cri.) No. 7615 of 2009 {Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.}. 3. The applications accordingly stand disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)