^ f3 ITJ :OURT OF CHHAT'riSGARli AT BILASPUR WMT FETITION (8) No. 328 of2U07 PETITIONER RE8PONDENTS Kum. Mila Bai D/o Sfari Sukhdev, Aged about 20 years, R/'o Saraipali (Vill & PO) Basna Bloek, Distt: Mahasamund, C.G. State. VERSUS 1. State of C.Q. Thru: Secretary, Paachayat Raj, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, CG Slate. 2. District Collector, Mahasamund District CG State. 3. Janpad Paachayat Throu^i Executive Qfiieer, Basna Block Dist: Mahasamund, CG State. 4. Project OfBca-, Litegrated Cliild Developmeid. Scheme, Basaa, Dist. Mahasamund, CG State. 5. Smt. Budhiyarin, W/o Shri Chaadan Siii^i, Saraipali, (Cillage & PO) Basna Block Maliasaaiiuid (CG) WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Slm Satish K. Agnlhotri, J. Present: Sfari K.R.Nair, Advocate fbr the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govemmeat Advocate No. 1.2and4. (Passed on 28th day of Februars.', 2008) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner sutaGnits that the appointment ofrespondent no. 5 on Ae post ofAi%an Etodi Worker for viliage Milarabad, Gram Panchayat Bijrabhata, Development Block Basna, District Mahasamund, is corttrary to the AneanBadi Scheme and law. Be that as it may, the disputed question of facts are involved in this matter, interest ofjustice would be subsMved, ifthe present disputes are reterredto the District Collector for decision after providing cyportuntty ofhearing to the concemed parties. Leamed counsel fbr the parties have noobjection. A^ccordinely, the matter is referred back to the Collector, Mahasamund for adjudication in accordance with law on its own ment, esroeditiously. In view ofthe above, the petition stands disposed o£ Amit Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge