r^ HIGH COURTOF CHHATnSGARH^ BILASPUR Petitioners Respondents Versus 1. 2. 3. El^! IW iwr" Writ Petition (Q No. 877 of 2009 1. Rajiv Choubey, aged about 40 years, son of B. K. Choubey. 2. Y. L. Narsiaihaa, aged about 69 yeara, son of Late Y. VciLkaaswamy. 3. Saadeep Cboudbary, aged about 39 ycars, son S.K.Choudhaty. 4. Amrik Siagh, aged about 46 year, son of Seva Siagh. 5. Sint. Shradlidha ttashyap, aged about 35 years, wife ofPrakesh Kashyap. AU c/o Siariti Grih Nirmau Saastha, Smriti Nagar, Bhilai distnct Durg (CG) 6. Sinriti Griha Nimiau. Sahakari Samiti Maryadit (Regd. No. 68) Junwaai, Distt. Durg (C.G.) State of Chhatdsgarh, through Secretary, Co-operative Department, Mantralaya Bhawaa, P.0. Ralpur,;Distt. Raipur(C.G.) Registrar, Co-opeiative Sociely, Raipur (C.Q-,) Joiat RegistraT, Cooperative Society, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Sociely, Durg (C.G.) 5. S.K.Das, son of Shri J.L.Das, aged about 59 years, resident of House No. C-35, Street No. 14, Smnti Nagar Bhilai, Dui^ (C.G.) 6. S. R. Sbanaa, son of Soiueswar Rao, aged about68 years, R/o C-23, Streetno. 7 Smriti Nagar, Bhilai, Durg (C.G.) 7. Sandeep Ramteke, Son of Late A. R. Ramteke, aged about 28 years, resident of House No. C-70, Street No. 15,Smriti Nagar, Bhilai, Durg (C.G.) 8. A.R.Patil, son of Late Shri Babu Rao Patil, , aged about 65 years, resident of House No. G-113, Street no. 16, Smriti Nagar Bhilai, Durg, (C.G.) 9. Arti. Arora, D/o Shri S. C. Arora, aged about 34 years, resident of House No. 21, Street No.7, Smriti Nagar, Bhilai, Dwg (C.G.) 10. Dilip Roy Choudhary, son of Shri S.K-Roy Choudhary, aged about 50 years, resident of House No. B-17, Street No. 12, Smriti Nagar, BIulai, Duig (C.G.) (Writ PetitiorLunderArticte 226 offhe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agxiihotn J.) s Shri Jitendra PaU, Advocate for the petitioaers. Shri Vivek Shanaa, Paael Lawyer for the respondents No. 1 to 4. ORDERtorall ( Passed on fhis 24*h day ofJuly, 2009) 1. 2. Heard. Leamed couiisel appearing for fhe petitioner, on instructions, submits that fhe petitioner may be permitted to withdraw fhis petition as it has becorae infl-uctuous. Accorduigly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge • ^t3:t«.::;.a.. ;s4.a^j^.;;?j^-