® PAGENO...(^J......•*— IN THE HONOURA3LE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUR3 OF CHHATTISGSRH AT 3ILASPUR. W_._P .N0 . !S '<' ^— /2p0 2 . PSTI'rION_UNDSR ARTICLE__22'6 OF ?H3: CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ MTH_ riRTICl.^ 22<7FOR XSSUANCE' OF WIT IN THB NATURE OF CERTIORriRI.MANDAMUS. PRQHI3ITION AND OTHEK SUjra3T.,E_W<^T OR WS.iT£> . ORDSR OR ORDERS, DIREGTION OR DIRECTION^_ PET1TIONERS ..» .•••' (.f 3^-"'^& ^-•"',^^v"' •"..A'"'VV!^' ^' ^- '[/ t-1^,^ ^ cy .....^..i^ 1. chatur SQn of Awadha Aged sbout 36 years, 2. Murari Son of ^wadh Ram 2;ged sbout 40 years. 3. Prahlad Son of Barati Aged about 47 years. 4. Meen Lal Son of Maheshi Aged about 32 years. 5. neochand son of Jiya Ram Aged aaout 40 years. 6. Khelan son of Rewa Aged about 55 years. 7. Anil son o£ Ganeshi Aged aboat 30 years. S. vishvanath Son of Jiya Ram Aged aboufc 34 years. 9. Funu Ram S/0 ftwadh Ram Aged about 50 yaars. 10. Kaushal son of Dandu @ Ram Singh aged obout 48 years. * • » ^•* PAGENO.... <•>•<' 11. Vljay son of Maheshi Aged about 35 years. 12. Umedi Son of puna Rara , Aged about 38 years. 13. Ram manohar Son of Rewa Ram, Aged about 52 years. 14. Ashok Son of Shobha Ram, Aged about 36 years. I- R£SPOND£NTS ^^ 'hS~:eas:!Ss-?:s^'' 15. Remchand Son Bf'.'-'aarula, Aged sbout 50 years, 16. Ramesh Son of Dhgni Ram , Aged about 45 years. All Resident of village Saristall, Tahsil Lormi ,Distt.Bilsspur (C.G) VERSUS 1. The State of chhatfcisgarh, Through collector, Bilaspur (C.G). 2. The Deputy Registrar, Co-operatlve societles, Bilsspur (C.G). 3. Pavan Das, President Samuhik Krlshl Sahakari Ssnsbha Maryadit Hardi Bandh, Tah. Lormi.Distt.Bilsspur (C.G) . PARTICULARS OF THE PST1TIONERS. As given in the cause title above • • • ^'» ti: nj 11; 1 'ti,' it" u <u -y" ^,-^->-;<; .A^ -'. av^y^ FT; XI-HC-22 rprRW, 'Era^TTS, ^^11^3? 3ti>??^ST f5;m>? sn^i arETT5f?W?a .U.-L^..^.^ '-»"' siT^t •^RnwafN ^qf^^T 'RTR^f V, f^^ <r^>^!.l< ^3fRTO-3:IR?I '»'».. 15.11.2002 Shri R.N.Jba, Coiinsel for fh^ petitioners. Shri Ranbir Singh, G.A. for tpe State. Shri Maiundra Shnvastava, ^ounsel for respondent No.3. Heard. I Admittedly, tiie Society to w|iich membership was clauned has gone under liquidation. In thls view of the matter, the relief claioied ia the petition has beconle iaGructuous. However, it is stated bv fhe leamed counsel for the petitioners that the I petitioners who arc below ftie jpoverty Une are entitled to aUotiaent of laad aad other beneQts. If fhat be so, it is for fhe petitioners to approacb fhe ap^ropriate authority under the relevaat provisions for seeking reli^f. TIie claita for aUotaient and j other benefits cannot be considbred bv this Court ia these 1 .. "-^ /. ^ .-- . r~.^ Y i proceedings but ia case such appU^ation is inoved, the same shaU be considered and disposed of on Ijheir own merits, iu accordauce j wiffa relevant provisions. 1 Wifh the aforesaid observation/direction, fhe petition staads disposedofas ialructuous. ponsequenfly, I.A.Nos.859/02, 860/02, 1717/02, 1718/02, 1718-IA, 4686/02, and 6626/02 also stand disposed of. _ j 1 Sd/- P. C. Naik Judge