' "'l 1/ $-s1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELIII AT NEW DELI{I + W.P.(CRL) 95112011 & Crl.M.A.757I|20II (interim relief) KHALIL UR REHMAN ..... Petitioner Through counsel (presence not given) ETSUS RAMDHAN MALHOTRA Through ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, SC for State with Mr. Amit Kumar, SI, P.S. Mandawali. Mr. M. Mukul, Adv. for R-1. o CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER 0s.08.2011 By this petition the Petitioner has sought protection from Respondent No.l on the ground that he was threatening him as his money was due to Petitioner. On a notice being issued a status report has been filed by the State which says that the Petitioner is residing as a tenant of Respondent No.l and is paying the rent to the Respondent No.l without default. On enquiry they found no grievance against each other. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the medical condition of the Petitioner is poor and thus he needs protection from Respondent No.l. w.P.(cRL) 9s1/2011 | page I of2 *33{:?& .k- - *i .i . .,1 .tt.$ iI I I I i1 i.i'' ,dfpif t : #H;.''t i..':.-i+. Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified r'_ -b' -. 1 t' 5 However, no medical document has been annexed in this regard. Learned counsel for the Respondent No.l further states that the present petition has been filed only to pressurize the Respondent No.l so that he does not demand the money. He states that the Respondent No.1 has never threatened the Petitioner and that he would recover his money by following due process of law. In view of the statement of Respondent No.l that he would recover the money due to the Petitioner in accordance with law, nothing survives in the present petition. Petition and application are dismissed. '?"fa- Muxla GUPTA,J AUGUST 05, 2011 'ga' w.P.(cRL) esl/2011 page 2 of 2