THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4106, 4111 and 5692 of 2008 COMMON ORDER: Since all three Revision Petitions are interconnected, they are heard together and disposed of by this common order. The petitioner who is the plaintiff files Civil Revision Petition Nos.4106, 4111 and 5692 of 2008 under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking to assail the correctness of the order, dated 05.08.2008, passed by the VIII Additional Senior Civil Judge (Fast Track Court), City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in I.A.Nos.290, 291 and 292 of 2008 in O.S.No.1374 of 2002, whereunder the petitions seeking to reopen the matter and summon the Assistant Pension Payment Officer for the purpose of adducing evidence and to call for Joint Photo with nomination (for family pension and gratuity) with relevant record pertaining to P.P.O.No.104955/F from the office of the Assistant Pension Officer, Hyderabad, were dismissed. Having regard the learned counsel appearing on either side and on perusal of the material on record, it is seen that all the three applications are only in the aid of process of the trial and therefore, the Court below ought to have given an opportunity to the petitioner by showing some indulgence rather than denying the same. Normally, the Rules of Procedure are to aid the parties but not to punish them. In view of the same, all the Civil Revision Petitions are allowed and I.A.Nos.290, 291 and 292 of 2008 in O.S.No.1374 of 2002 on the file of the VIII Additional Senior Civil Judge (Fast Track Court), City Civil Court, Hyderabad, are allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO 10th December 2010 DR