1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3658/2008 & 3659/2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Essar Shipping Limited, Mumbai ..Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3660 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 5, Mkumbai ..Appellant. Versus Shri Subhash Agarwal, Mumbai ..Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3661 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Gitanjali Export Corporation Limited, Mumbai ..Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.S.J. Mehta for the respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3669 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – City 10, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus Sundaram Multipap Limited, Mumbai ..Respondent. Mr.J.S. Saluja for the appellant. None for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 8TH JULY, 2009 P.C. : Appellant is directed to remove office objections, if any, and serve unserved respondent within eight weeks from today. Hamdust allowed. In addition to hamdast service, private service by R.P.A.D. / Speed post is permitted. Failure on the part of the appellant to remove office objections and / or to serve unserved respondent, appeal shall stand dismissed without any reference to the Court. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)