1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.322 OF 2009 _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office } Memoranda of Coram, } Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's } orders or directions } and Registrar's orders } ___________________________}___________________________________ Mr.S. V. Gangapurwala, Advocate for petitioner. Mr.Rajendra Deshmukh, Advocate for the respondent no.1. ...... [ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. ] DATE : 11/01/2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard both the Counsel. Pursuant to the directions dated 26th March, 2009 in Writ Petition No.6884/2008, the prayer clause `B' therein contemplates as under :- "B:- By writ of mandamus, or any other suitable writ, order or direction the respondents may be directed to release the land bearing Survey No.38/2, situated at 2 Mahindale, within the Municipal limits of the Dhule Municipal Corporation, admeasuring 1 Acres and 2 gunthas from the reservations No.55", for which the Rule has been made absolute in the above referred Writ Petition. Mr. Deshmukh submits that there is no reason for the Municipal Corporation, Dhule to flout the directions of this Hon'ble Court and implementing the same by deleting the property of the present petitioner. Mr.Deshmukh submits that in the light of the orders in the above Writ Petition so far as the Municipal Corporation is concerned, the reservation at Sr. No.55 of the land in question is dereserved. It is no more under reservation of the Municipal Corporation. 2. Mr.Deshmukh also submits that he is unaware, if any S.L.P. is preferred by the Municipal Corporation or State Government seeking to challenge the 3 orders in the above referred Writ Petition. 3. In the light of above, the statement made by Mr. Deshmukh on behalf of the Municipal Corporation, Dhule, Mr.Gangapurwala has no objection. Hence, the Contempt Petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. K.U.CHANDIWAL ] JUDGE gas/cp322.09