a^i^- m ^ VSWM f IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) NO.^S^ OF 2010 (S.B.) PETITIONER RESPONDENTS : Mahendra S/o Shri Moh^i, aged 28 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, Primary School Ulnar, Post Office Sadhgur, Block Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The High Power Caste Scrutiny Committee, Scheduled Caste Research and Training Institute, Ravishankar University Campus, Raipur (C.G.), through the Secretary, High Power Caste Scrutiny Committee, Scheduled Caste Research and Training Institute, Raipur. /^e^D'^^e c ^"^e ^ T^ d^^Y C ficLS^) ct/ 3. The Janpad Panchayat Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.), through its Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Jagdalpur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA ^^^ iS. •%, v<^ "3° ^^^€^ XI-HC—78 WRdT^MIch TSr ^il^Krj^, ^tl1<rf^|(o, [®l<r11<H^< ..L^m..^..:....y.<[:7.^/S200 3?n^T Tra^ (y<Ii<si^) 3TT^?T ^FT'f^aT^ Tf^T STT^Ts^'N' k— ^TTW^rf?^ 3TT^?I SB: Ron>l»l®Slurl Manlttdra Moh^n Nu'Iwaatawa^J. 16.8.2010 Shri M.K. BhadiuA & St^i Kundaa Stagli^ eouaael for fhe petitioner, Shri Viaod Tekam, Panel I^^wyer for €he State/xiespoadeiit No.l & 2, oa advance copy» Heaxd on admission* Case of fhe petitioner is ths| Shiksha Kanni Grade-HI. He has time of his appointDient The reqidred the petitioner to obtaia Caste Scrutbiy Coixxmittee (fbr fhe petition that an applicatio^ issuaiice of certificate was xaade tt did not issue aiiy ackaiowledgmeail The grievance of fhe petiti<| rexnahied peiidiag before tfae C<| contEt)!, rcspondent-employer (Annexure P-4) aad is now failing which the sendces of fhe lla^ press|uig Petitioner shall appear one moiitti J&om today. Oa befoic applica|tioii cbl^id^l^ ^(^dll^ff^t <fa^i< ^3tf?FT3n^T h^t he was cqppdb^ted 011 2^2.2(X)9 a^ mbinitted his caste certifieats at the respoxideirt- Appoitattag Aiifhorily taste certifieate fiiom Ae ©tateLevel sti|ort <<the Coxximititee^, It is stated ia for appropriate verifiaatkn acud the Commitkee, but fb@ Comiatttee fhou^i it is seized of tiie eaquiiy. ^ner is fhat lAioix^i the roa^ter Ims jimmittee, wtucii is EMtft withto Ms issued letter oa ll.S.2009 hard to prodiice fbe certificgrte, Wi&y be bxwi^st to aa eaid« petitioxier fhe Committee wifhia a period of sisibaaiitted by fh^ petttioii^ tfae ^•-^^' .-.-.• -v^,;;',^Xl-HC—78. <i\ ^^T ^|q|<nq, ^tTl<H4|(o, ^<11^^< ^TOc'IT VhWGh •^ 200 an^r Tr^R7 ((iGii'lQ<<^) ^^ ^T R^i^h ^^T^TT^TsCTFF Praveen ^"^f.. ^TcHW^rf^cT ^H^T - z- acknowl^dgment Coinmittee shaH issue aa The scnrtioy ia the case of tib€| Coiximittee, In case of non-cojo] Committee may i3iform fhe aforesaid comiitioa ofco-operatk)a3| decides fhe case of fhe petition^r, coercive steps 011 the ground of Committee, ofreceiptoftite a^plie^tioii* petltioaer shafl be made by )|opexation by tlie petittoaaer, the employer, Siib|ect to the 1 lyy fhe petitioiier, tUi fhe Coiaimittee ^jr, resrpondent No,S shaH iiot take ^oii-prodiictioa of certificate by the "co|opeiatioi pet|t&Mier?s Wifh fhe aforesaid disposed oflF. observ^ttoiis, the petitioii ateuds fiaialfy ahl^f<n<fl<l 'WT^if ^* 'f^st Tf^R:$K ^^fRma^T Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge