( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No.03 of 2008 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No.03 of 2008 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No.03 of 2008. Vasant Vishnu Gaikwad ..Applicant. Vs. Suvarna Vasant Gaikwad and Ors ..Respondents. Mr Dilip Bodake, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs P. P. Shinde, A.P.P. for the State-Respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. DATED : 30.06.2008. DATED : 30.06.2008. DATED : 30.06.2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the respondent-State. 2. Perused application and the material available on record. 3. During the course of hearing, I was taken through the order of the Trial Court as well as that of the Appellate Court. It is not in ( 2 ) dispute that the present applicant is husband earning almost five times more than the wife. Assuming that the wife is working as an Anganwadi teacher and she is getting honourarium in the sum of Rs. 750/- per month. It is not possible for any person to survive in Rs. 750/-. The wife is also entitled to have the same standard of living which the husband is having. The husband is in the Police Department. He is in Government service. Thus, looking to the material on record, no case is made out to interfere in the impugned order. 4. In the result, the revision application is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. JUDGE. JUDGE. JUDGE.