1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR ORDER S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1844/2009 Pratishtha Sharma Versus The State of Rajasthan DATE OF ORDER --- MAY 18, 2009 PRESENT HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE PREM SHANKER ASOPA Ms.Pradeep Lata Mathur, for the petitioner Mr.M.Faisal Baig, for the State BY THE COURT (1) Issue notice to the respondents. (2) Mr.Baig is directed to accept the notices. (3) Heard learned counsel for the parties. (4) Counsel for both the parties submit that the controversy raised in the present writ petition with regard to not countersigning the experience certificate by the concerned District Education Officer is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court dated 2.3.2009 delivered in Usha Sharma Vs. State of Raj. & ors. passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1594/2009. (5) The case of Priti Dixit which was 2 followed in Krishan Vijay Sharma & others V. State of Rajasthan and others decided on 13.1.2009 passed in SBCWP No.6530/2008 and 52 other writ petitions, the relevant portion of the same is as follows: “With regard to pending litigation of the para teachers beside age relaxation their experience be considered in the light of the same principles and the persons other than para teachers are also eligible to be given appointment on the post of Prabodhak according to their merit.” (6) In view of the above, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner and pass appropriate order of assessment of merit as well as even found suitable for the post of Prabodhak then appointment be made within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. (7) The writ petition is disposed of as indicated above. (Prem Shanker Asopa) J. Gopal