1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1579 OF 2008 Abdul Kalam @ Abu Kalam Anazul Shaikh ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.Rahul Arote, advocate, for applicant Mrs.S.D.Shinde, A.P.P, for the State CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 14TH MAY, 2008 P.C. . Heard both the advocates. 2. Perused the record. The allegations against the accused/applicant are for the offence punishable under Sections 394, 397, 225 and 332 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The incident has taken place on 22nd April, 2006. The present accused/applicant was not available for the interrogation and absconded for nine months causing the police to file supplementary 2 chargesheet. The papers indicate, at the instance of other accused when he pointed house of this accused, the blood stains on apparels of the present accused/applicant were recovered as handed over by his wife. The conduct of accused/applicant speaks volume against him to entertain the bail application, there is no permanent abode for the accused/applicant. Naturally his release on bail will hamper the trial. His bail application No.3/2008 was rejected by the learned Additional Sessions Judge by Order dated 8th April, 2008. Hence, considering the above facts this bail application stands rejected. (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)