^ .<- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl No: ' /2011 PETITIONER ^\...-<^. \}^-^:^-:-"\ .....<:D^^..--"" ^"'"s""^- ^..---""" ^^ ,\^ oa^' ^.A&r Birbhadra Singh Paikra S/o Late Shri Barsingh Paikra aged about 46 Years, Principal, presently working at Govt. Higher Secondary School Jatga, Block- Podi-uproda, DistrictKorba (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS .^^'"^ -,-."^^^. /'e^f ~y%. 1. ' State of Chhattisgarh Through '' Secretary, Tribal Welfare Deportment, D.K.S. ^ Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deportment, Korba 3. District Korba (C.G.) Principal Govt. Higher Secondary School Jatga, Block- Podi-uproda, District Korba (C.G.) Joint Director, Treasury, accounts, pension, Bilaspur District-Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE 4. CONSTITUTION OF INDIA •!;1^'.? :/. -,<@3 XI-HC—78 HWW ^tfWW 5rcT -<f|<^|c{U,^ ^TJly'lfi, fq<ni<-l^< rf^ ....U..^..<A.)..C<S>.:..^L.U 31I^?T'<ra^T (' an^ii ^i f^iiii ?fsn 3{T^T^)T|tq7 TOlWtfew^I -.u' S.B.: HOS'BLE MR. JUSTICE PDiITIMKBR DIWAKER 36.07.3011 Shri Ashwiai ShuJda, coua^f Shri A.V.Shridhar, P.L. for|the Counsel for (he pedtioner 'ftNld^ TTTR^if 'Sf f^^ ^^'l^ ^sifgtian^r iel for the petitioner. State. subinits ffaat fhe petitioner is entitted to benefit of two advaac^ nicreiuents on aceouat of he haviag passed B.Ed. examinati.oi^ toefore his appoiutment at his own cost. It is submitted fhat (h^ issue involved in fhe present petition is no longer res integra decided by fhe Hon'ble Suprer4e Court irr fhe case of Asfaa bnd the sarue has been finaUy Saxena Vs. State ofM.P. 8s OrsJ It is further submitted th4 siimlar view ia its order dated Q 6257/2008. Counselforfhe order dated 29..4.2010 passed whereiu iclying upon the judg4 fhe case ofAsha Saxena (supraj Court in another Writ Appeal been issued for consideration advance iucrem.ents as per the State of Madhva Pradesh. pleaded in fhe petition. judgi^ient circitlar peti|fcioner In. 2009 (III)MPJR (SCj 59. lit this C-ourt has also taken a 1.2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. farttier subinits fhat the Writ Appeal N0. 124/2009, of the Supienie Coiurt iti aud the order passed by this No. 87/2009, directions have of the case for grant of two dated 21.9.1974 issued by after verification of the facts Couasel for the State subhiits that case ofthe petitioner would also be considered on theisanie liaes. XI-HC—78 ^ST "41<41M<4, ^TfRFrg, 'f^TRiy W-RWdi^lth sn^i 'vw' (lj°i!j«<<^r) cfl)^T ^I fSFTRT vn sv^v iiitiicb 'c; ttt (lirection to fhe petitloner to fite ^efore the coinpetent aufhority ani|l in fhe eventuaUty of fiting ^ny such icpresentation, fhe ' :onsider the same in accordance ^ppropnate order. '^nwHfwan^t In view of above, fhe petilpon is disposed of with a cftl<lici<fl'l HiHfif ^T f6Ict Tf^R^TC ^; atRiT an^r |;oinpeteDt aufhorily shaU. with law and would pass It is made clear fhat fhis |apiaion on nierits of fhe case (would be at Uberty to decide the C^urt has not expressed any the authorily conceraed saiae in accordance with law. Sd/- Prkmker Diwaker <- Judge