cN--:. IN THE HIGH COURT GF GHHATTISOARH AT BI&^PUR APPLICMTTS CLAIMANTS ;,R»NO,», t l<i/ 3.iohN>t >OP 2003, ^ ••• . ^.^y' ^y' ''y m--' NQN-APPLICANTS : 1. /' x >/ JUcP^i^>t ' S/o<, late Kanda3<e» 55 yeac-s, 2<i smt^ San^ci^ W/©* l.afcho» 50 years» • Smti, Sudax>i> W/o, late ca'iandru» 25 years* ^* Kti* Mynni, .•3. D/o< lafee chandru» 3 years, Applloant no» 4 through Next firlerid natural GBardian app»Bo»l All R/o^ vlll^ pinkonda* E <S < MArt^r, pogt Neiasnaar, Dlstt, ©antewada(C«G»)• V E R S U S Pramil Kumar Bajpayee S/o* shri R,p, Bajpayee, R/o» Lai Bagh, Amaguda* Jagdalpur^ R»P»Jangel, S^o^ Nirmal Kumar Jangel» R/o» 4/S8 Irrigation ©olony» Jagdalpur» Distty Bastar. The Uaitect Insuranee eo»ltd^ Anupama cihcs^lc Main Itoody Jagdalpur, Di.stt, Bastar (C»G,)« ^VIJ- REVISION 1?/Soll5 OF THE CIVII,_PROCEDURE CODE. eontd,••2*,, g-— XI-HC-22 ~^^S ^WW^, ^•al^^to, fN^TF^Ty sa^ t^w ^^ l-S^ ^ITOWSFW^'"*'"*****"*'*'**'*"**'**'*"**'*^^ 'fN^T' W^T^T fcyich a^T ^t^'^f^T ^^ ^^T^R ^f^a ct)l^l(<r!<fl'l 'RFT^f ^ t^st <Hsl^l< '^31^TH311^F Y-- \-' oftbe 04.07.2003 Shri Praful Bharat, Heard. It is subniitted that on was traveling ui a Vehicle and the said vehicle out of ra^ furtle where Henila ChandrLi being legal representatives u/s 140 of the Motor Veliicl^ The leamed Motor Accident Cl the application, granted interi The said ainount was deposit^ TIie leaziied Tilbuiial direclecl flxed deposit in the name of deceased and the reniainder non-appllcants no.l to 3 anc^ only per inonth. Lcanied couiisel for tll< Tribunal has graiited th|e coun^el for the petitioners. 1.3.2002 one Hemla Chandru be^ring Regii.no. M.P.25/B-0031 \li and negligent driving tui'ned died. The applicants herein deceased filed an application as Act claiming coinpensation. Ijaims Tribunal after considering i^o. compensation ofRs.50,000/- it^d by the Insurance Company. llial Rs.20,000/- be kept ui a ipplicant. no.4, the daiight.er of )e kept in a savings account of they can withdraw Rs.2000/- Rs.50,000/- and that. the liability i^iiot be directed to] of the provisions contained| \ Vehicles Act aiid Rule 228 ofj petitioner subniits that the interim compensation qf amoLint paid under^ no-faLilt be kept tn fixed deposlt inview in Section 140 of the Motor ;he Act which provide succor to [Tft^ ^Ra^ XI-HC-22 '^~^r ^i^Krt^, ^-al^^co, fa^ti^y ^. .^:. ^IHW 5^<Wb 3ff^T ^RF _.....^..f?..-.M.c?...:....L9"^ 2003 'fN^T' ^TI^T^T /- F^ich 3Tlt3?T \r^H\^ ^rf^T ^IT^T ^^T^T ^f^T CM^(<rj<fl<l ^i^^ifTf fs^ <Fsi^i< ^'3Tf^W3:n^T M the legal heirs of the dftceased of the Tribunal to deposit the frustrate the veiy purpose for m.ade. He further submits that of nioney. Leained couiisel decision of this Court repc {GajaropanYadav & Another |immediately and the direction ^inount in fixed deposit would ^hich the provisions have been jthe applicants are in dire need flor the petitioner relied on a 4rted in 2002(2) CGLJ 159 Vs- T.S. SinghdeoSsothersi ^< m[id imSii Having considered the case, niaterial on record judginent, it is directed that Insurance Company be appUcants by an account paye Willi llie du'ecliyii ffnalty. In view of the above hearing also stands disposed C.C. as per rules. f^cts and circumstaaces of the in view of the aforesaid jthe aniount deposited by the im|iiediately disbursed to tlie Cheque/ Demand Draft. afore^aid^ the pelitioii is disposed of or^er, I.A.No.4282/03 for urgent df. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^' :(~''^ ^ [Tft^ ^&^