HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1957 of 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 06.05.2011 in I.A.No.103 of 2011 in O.S.No.69 of 2010 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Peddapalli, whereunder the said application filed by the petitioners herein-defendants 1 to 3 for vacating the interim injunction, was dismissed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the first respondent. Perused the records. The first respondent herein filed the suit initially against the petitioners-defendants 1 to 3 for permanent injunction. Subsequently, respondents 2 and 3 herein were impleaded as defendants 4 and 5. The petitioner filed I.A.No.103 of 2011 for vacating the interim injunction granted in I.A.No.262 of 2010. The trial Court by the impugned order dismissed the said application on the ground that notices were not served on defendants 4 and 5. The reason for dismissal of the application as mentioned in the impugned order is rather strange. If the service of notices on all the respondents is considered necessary, the Court shall direct necessary steps to be taken for effecting service of notice. The petition itself cannot be dismissed on the ground that notices are not served on all the respondents. Learned counsel for the first respondent-plaintiff would submit that subsequently, notices on defendants 4 and 5 were also served by way of substitute service. The impugned order dismissing the application for the reason mentioned therein is not sustainable and is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and consequently, I.A.No.103 of 2011 in O.S.No.69 of 2010 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Peddapalli, stands restored and the trial Court shall dispose of the same on its own merits and in accordance with law. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________________ JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY 18th July 2011 DR