THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26070 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner claims to be a tenant in premises bearing No.12-13-555, Nagarjuna Nagar Colony, Tarnaka, Secunderabad. His grievance is that respondent No.3 has constructed a compound wall over part of the road in front of the premises blocking access. The local residents including the landlord of the petitioner are said to have submitted representations to respondent No.2. His grievance is that no action has been taken thereon. Across the Bar, Sri K.G.K.Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after the writ petition was filed, respondent No.2 has demolished the wall and further steps in the form of removing the debris etc., need to be carried out. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2. The petitioner, no doubt, felt aggrieved by the construction of the compound wall encroaching upon a road, allegedly by respondent No.3. Even before the writ petition could be taken up, the wall is said to have been removed. With that, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. In case the petitioner still feels that any further steps are to be taken, it shall be open to him to submit a representation to respondent No.2. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to bring to the notice of respondent No.2 about the steps that are to be taken, be it in the form of removal of foundation or restoration of road to its original condition. Respondent No.2 shall take necessary action thereon, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of representation so made. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:01.12.2009 Note: Issue cc in three days. (B/o) kdl