IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.38841 of 2009 PINTOO KUMAR @ TAILA YADAV, son of Sukhadeo Yadav, resident of village Chiraiyatad, P.S. Rampur, district Gaya .. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR .. Opposite Party **** /2/ 07.11.2009 Heard both the sides. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 307, 504 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code, 27 of the Arms Act and 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that the allegation of firing and causing injuries to the informant is upon co-accused, Tinku Yadav, and not the petitioner and even though it is being submitted that bomb was thrown, but, no injury is said to have caused on account of such explosion, let the petitioner, above named, who is in custody since 31.08.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Rampur P.S. Case No. 79 of 2009 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, on the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit 2 giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the Court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)