IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.2734 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: 20.2.2009 Partap Singh and others ...Petitioners VERSUS State of Punjab & another …Respondents CORAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI PRESENT: Mr.M.K.Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioner Ms.Charu Tuli, Sr.DAG, Punjab Permod Kohli, J. (Oral) The petitioners have challenged the notice (Annexure P-10) whereby the petitioners' services are intended to be terminated w.e.f. 28.2.2009. No reason is indicated in the notice as to why the petitioners do not fulfil the conditions of government policy notified for regularization. Notice of motion. On the asking of this Court, Ms.Charu Tuli, Sr. DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents-State. With the consent of the counsel, this petition is disposed of at motion stage. After going through the notice and seeking instructions from the Secretary, Archive and Museum Department and the Director, Cultural Affairs, Archive and Museum Department, Punjab, Ms. Charu Tuli has made a statement at the Bar that the respondents have decided to withdraw CWP No.2734 of 2009 :2: this petition and they will issue a fresh notice after recording reasons. In view of the above statement, this petition is rendered infructuous. However, the petitioners shall have the liberty to approach this Court, if they are aggrieved of the fresh notice, if any, issued by the respondents. It is, however, observed that the respondents will give reasonable time to the petitioners so that the petitioners may be able to avail the remedy available under law. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 20.2.2009 MFK