ssp 1 PIL 52 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.52 OF 2010 Vasant Krishnaji More and Ors. .....Petitioners versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.Pankaj Deokar i/by Mr.Rahul Kate, for the petitioners. Mr.S.S.Bhende, AGP, for respondent No.1. Mr.Abhijit Kulkarni, for respondent No.2. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATE: 25th FEBRUARY, 2011. P.C. : 1. By way of this petition, petitioners have prayed that respondent No.2 Corporation be directed to implement the schemes mentioned in para No.2 of this petition, which read as under : a) Intelligent Transport system (ITS), Critical Public Place Surveillance (CPSP), Garbage and Octroi Vehicle Management System (GVMS), Red Light Detection System (RVTS), Area Traffic Control System (ATCS); b) Sharad Computer Scheme; c) Garbage Project by Pune Municipal Corporation; d) Diamond Shaping Machine for Mahila Bachat Gat. 2. On behalf of the Corporation, affidavit-in-reply has been filed, stating that all the Schemes are functioning properly. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that certain cameras are not ssp 2 PIL 52 of 2010 functioning properly in connection with the CCTV Camera. Learned counsel for the respondent-Corporation states that if any camera is not functioning properly, appropriate steps will be taken to see that such cameras become functional immediately. In case any camera is damaged, the Maintenance Department will take appropriate care and the same will be made functional. 3. In view of the stand taken by the respondent-Corporation, nothing is required to be done in the petition. Public Interest Litigation is disposed of. ( A.A.SAYED, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )