BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Thirtieth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15647 of 2011 1. MEENACHI, 2. JAYAKRISHNAN ... PETITIONER Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALANKULAM POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DT. (CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT For Petitioner : M/S. R.MURUGAPPAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as accused and they prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 406, 294(b) and 506(i) IPC and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. Heard Mr.R.Murugappan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian learned Additional Public Prosecutor (criminal side) appearing for the state. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and hence he prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal Side) would submit in his argument that the petitioners are the in-laws of the de- facto complainant. He would further submit in his argument that the de- facto complainant's husband died in a road accident and after his death, the petitioners have not returned the jewels and the house-hold-articles to the de-facto complainant and the plea of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail may not be considered. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I could see that the petitioners are the in-laws of the de-facto complainant, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the Judicial Magistrate court, Sivakasi and each of them executing a bond for a sum of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Sivakasi and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days failing which the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 30/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAKASI 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALANKULAM POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. R.MURUGAPPAN Advocate SR.No.42140 GH : 02.12.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15647 of 2011 Date :30/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/