IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2008 / 18TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 808 of 2008(U) ------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER IN MC.7/2006 IN SC.15/2006 of VI ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER: ------------ 1. SYAMALA,W/O. MOHANAN, AGED 39, VALIYAPARAMBIL, MAKKANAYI, CHITTATUKARA PARAVUR TALUK. 2. THANKAPPAN,S/O. KOCHUKANNAN,AGED 60 KAMBIVELIKKAKATHU, THANNIPPADAM, CHITTATTUKARA, PARAVUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.S.SHYAM RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, PARAVUR TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, NORTH PARAVUR. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER PARAVUR VILLAGE, VILLAGE OFFICE NORTH PARAVUR. BY ADV. SRI. PUZHAKKARA MUHAMMED, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR , J. ========================== W.P (C). No. 808 of 2008 ========================== Dated this the 8th day of January, 2008. JUDGMENT Heard both sides. 2. The petitioners, who are the sureties of one Jabbar, the 1st accused in C.C No. 15/2006 on the file of the 6th Additional District and Sessions Court, Ernakulam, seeks to keep in abeyance Exts.P3 and P4 notices issued under the Revenue Recovery Act attaching their properties for the non-compliance of the order passed in M.C. No. 7/2006 under Section 446 Cr.P.C. The only grievance of the petitioners is that they have applied for certified copy of the order passed by the trial court on 28.09.2007 for the purpose of filing an appeal under Section 449 Cr.P.C and that they have not so far received the certified copy. But the revenue recovery proceedings are being continued against them. 3. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the 6th Additional Sessions Court, Ernakulam to issue certified copy of the final order in M.C. No. 7/2006 in S.C. No. 15/2006 W.P.(C) NO. 808/2008 : 2 : expeditiously and at any rate within three weeks of receipt of a copy of this judgment, provided that a valid copy application by the petitioner is pending before that court. In case the certified copy is not issued within the above time frame, 6th Additional Sessions Court shall send a report to the registry of this Court explaining the reasons as to why the certified copy could not be issued within the above time frame. Further proceedings in pursuance of Exts.P3 and P4 notices shall be kept in abeyance for a period of three weeks to enable the petitioner to file an appeal against the final order passed in M.C. W.P.(C) is disposed of as above. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv W.P.(C) NO. 808/2008 : 3 :