•X"^. Jf IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^leil M.C.C. No.4-^ of 2006 (Arising out of order passed in C.R. No. 197/2004) Petitioner/Dr.Hr. z«.^>"' ^^ ^7 Smt. Narayan Kaur, W/o Sardar Attar Singh, aged about 78 years, Resident of Old Police Lane^ Sharda Chowk, Raipur, Tah. & Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Respondents/J.Drs. f^ ^^•&^%.^\ /. >-~':~.:' '^ 1. Smt. Ragini Devi, Widow of Late Shri Krishna Rao aged about 70 years, 2. Ku. Nanda^ Daughter of Late Shri Krishna Rao^ 3. Rakesh, S/o Shri Krishna Rao, 4. Ku. Malti,Daughter of Late Shri Krishna Rao, 5. Ku. Jyoti, Daughter of Late Shri Krishna Rao, 6. Ku. Chanchala, Daughter of Late Shri Krishna Rao, 7. Ku. Bharati, Daughter of Late Shri Krishna Rao, -2- 8. Deepak, Son of Late Shri Krishna Rao, 9. Sanjay, Son of Late Shri Krishna Rao, All major, resident ofGum Nanak Marg^ Varasivni, Tahsil Varasivni, Distt. Balaghat (M.P.) 10. Smt. Gangabai, aged about 71 yrs. Widow of Late Shri Shankar Rao 11. Ku. Sandhya, Daughter of Late Shri Shankar Rao, Resident of Old Police Lane, Sharda Chowk, Raipur, Tah. & Distt. Raipur (C.G.) ./ '^ •\ ^ II ,........-:'. ^- 'gi^^ sSS^' 12. Shri Rama Rao Vangatwar Clerk, State Bank of India, Main Branch, Jai Stambh Chowk Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) .^ APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OFaYILJlEVISION UNDER SECTION 151 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE r / 1 XI-HC-78 3:TT^T^rf^TN) c^TT3TF^T$h^lch *11^dl Sti+lich S^T^TPTT^PT, ^Tfl<rljl(o, f®lcrll<M^< M.;.:^.^r....^2oo(; &11^1 Mslth (*ic«^s«^T) ^<TTW^f^T^?T 12.1.2007 Shri G.D.Vaswani, IJLNo.2850/2006 Heard, This is an application fo^ The application is allow€|d Document is taken on This interim application| In view of fhe above, L\ also staads disposed of M.C.C.No.468/2006 Heaid. This M.C.C. is an C.R.No. 197/2004, which compliance of order dated 28[ directed for issuaace of fpesh correct addresses on payment fhe revision was dirccted to bd Bench, Leamed counsel for fhe notice was sent to fhe responc earUer occasion and wifh a bo| by a substituted service, hc according to order dated 28,6,; substituted service on 5.7.; support his contention, coun|sel for fhe appUcant, takiag docunient ou record, ^d. r^cord, [staads disposed of. |\.No.3264/2006 for urgent hearing wa|s <=hi^Id41-< WT^rf ^f te^t' <Ri<-<;i< ^3:rf^R'3TT§[?T application for rcstoration of dismissed in default for non 1.6.2006, by which, fhis Court has notice to the respondents on fheir (ofP.F. wifhin 7 days, failingwhich, dismissed wifhout reference to fhe jappUcant submits fhat in fact, the tents on fheir corrcct addresses on ^jaafide mtentioa to get fliem seryed could not fUe fhe process fee ^006 and he filed aa application for !p06 vide I.A.NO.2089/2006. To tie refers to the record of XI-HC-78 w^T^rf^ri^ cf^TW^T^TT^ ]-.-. J^awh, *11+1dl ?h*1ich 3'^r r^i^ici^, ^Tn<-i^i<o, facii^iy .^.^...^..^^c, 3<l^l ^5|cb (^i^<s<^) ^<rrw^f?cT3T^T -1-- C.R.No. 197/2004, in which, cbJ^T^I^-j ^TTOt ^ te^Tf^R^TC ^3Tf^T3T7^T |at page No. 20, an appUcation for substituted service (I,A.No.2|089/2006) is enclosed, which is shown to be rcceived ia f(ie Registry on 5,7.2006 fhrough P.R.No.5049/2006. In view of fhe above con|keation raised by learaed counsel for fhe appUcatioa for substituted fhe applicant that he has seryice within 7 days and application would be atlowed, ui fhe beUeve that fhe aforcsaid he did not file P.F. in time aad fhe rcvision was dismissed by th|e prc-emptoiy ordei, appeara to be bona&de. For fhe reasons stated ap>ove, fhe default for non-paynient of P.F. according to order da^ed 28.6.2006, passed in C.R.No. 197/2006 is hereby condone<p[ aiid the revision is restored to its original nimiber. It be Usted for heanng ii^ next week. This M.C.C. (465/2006) stands finalty disposed of, Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge P.T.O.