IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13455 of 2008 Dukha Yadav @ Dukha Lal Yadav & Ors Versus State Of Bihar & Anr ----------- For the Petitioner—Sri Pramod Kumar Singh Sri Dharmendra Kumar Singh For the OP--- Sri G.K. Jha Sri B.B.Jha 03 08.09.2011 The petitioners have filed this application for quashing the entire criminal proceeding as well as order dated 1.12.2007 passed by the Court of Assistant Sessions Judge-II, Supaul in S.T. No. 75/95 rejecting the application of the accused petitioner for discharge under Section 227 Cr.P.C. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that on perusal of F.I.R and statement of so called eye witnesses the occurrence is simple quarrel and minor injuries received through lathi, fatka and satka but later on other witnesses examination in investigation changed the statement saying the use of deadly weapon Farsa, but the contradiction which is vital has not been considered the petitioner under Section 227 has been illegally rejected through impugned order. The impugned order goes to show that after discussing the materials available on the record and the injury report the Assistant Sessions Judge-II, Supaul has rejected the petition for discharge. As such there is nothing in the impugned order to show that there is any abuse of the process of law in passing the order. Thus, this application stands dismissed. Namita ( Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)