CWP No.9377 of 2009.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.9377 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 31.03.2011 **** Dr. Jasdeep Kaur . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Guneet Babbar, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Monica Chhibber Sharma, DAG Punjab Mr. Ravinder Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.3&4 **** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner was appointed as a Medical Service Provider by the Zila Parishad, Gurdaspur on contract basis. Even before expiry of his contract period on 30.06.2009, the petitioner’s services were terminated on 12.06.2009. (2). One of the grievance of the petitioner is that she was not been heard nor any opportunity to explain the causes behind certain complaints received against her was afforded by the Chairman of the Zila Parishad. CWP No.9377 of 2009.doc - 2 – (3). In these circumstances and without expressing any views on the allegations/counter-allegations, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Chairman, Zila Parishad Gurdaspur to give an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and to let her substantiate her claim that the complaints were engineered against her for extraneous considerations. The Chairman, Zila Parishad shall re-consider the whole matter uninfluenced of the previous decision taken by the authorities and take a fresh decision in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (4). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 31.03.2011 Vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge