C.W.P. No. 15417 of 2011 [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 15417 of 2011 Date of Decision: Aug. 23, 2011 Sunita Sharma .......................................... Petitioner Versus The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Patiala and others ................................. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Vishwajit Bedi, Advocate for the petitioner. ... RITU BAHRI, J. The petitioner-workman had worked with the Management from 5.9.1995 to 31.3.1997. Her services were terminated on 1.4.1997. The Labour Court vide award dated 22.10.2009 (Annexure P1) has held that petitioner was appointed on contract basis in TBU project. After her termination the post of a Clerk was advertised in May 1997. Petitioner had participated in the selection process on 21.7.1997. One Deepak Hans was selected for the post on C.W.P. No. 15417 of 2011 [ 2 ] the basis of selection. The workman has not been able to lead any evidence that any body junior to her was retained in the above said project. Once the post of Clerk was advertised and petitioner had participated in the selection, she has no right to reinstatement since the petitioner was appointed under a Technical Backup Unit Scheme which expired on 31.3.1997 and thereafter the post was advertised. There is no violation of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Her case is covered under Section 2(oo)(bb) of the Industrial Disputes Act. Writ petition is dismissed. 23.8.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE