s' o" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. (^,'^- /20W- s^o\\ PETITIONER /: Smt. Renu Singh W/o Shri R. K. Singh, Aged about 42 years, Occupation - Lecturer, Govt. Hir. Sec. School Kurud o.......-'-r7^I^i.^^ Bhilai Distt. Durg (CG). ert9dWS"">-v_....^^-_ O^-^-^^o VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA t I-HC-22 ^ .<' SIT^iq? p;-iidi 3)lS^I ^)<-ficb ^fin ||NB l^ ^ST "iii-siici-M, riTfl'y'ito, facii+iy •^ & )-v^0 'lt *imorai»fl^i 200 fa'btiST' sn^iWRR^ifea <^^i<r1'4lT1 'CTP:RTf "^ 'fe1^ <f^ ^R '^arfSgHsn^r SB: Hon'bte Shri ManindFa MohaA Shrivastava. J. 10-01-2011 Shri Vipin Tiwari, counsel for pie petttioner. Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer|for the State/respondents. Heard. Leamed counsel appearing f^r ttie peUtioner submits that the petiConer is entitled to beneflt of two advan4e increments on account of she having passed B.Ed examination before |ier appointment at her own cost. It is submitted that the issue invoh/ed |n the present peiition is no ionger IBS integra and the same has been finafy decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena vs. Stbte ofM.P. & Ors.. aOW fim MPJR fSC) 59. It is further submitled that thi^ Court has also taken a simiiar view in Its order dated 06-02-2009 passed in W-P-(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned counsel fbr the petitioner further draws ^ttention of this Gourt to order dated 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal t^o.124 of 2009, wherein refying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in tfie case of Asha Saxena (supra) and tte order passed by this Court in ancjther Writ Appeal No.87/2CX)9, directions have been issued for consideratio|i of the case for grant of two advanee increments as per circular dated 211-09-1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification offte facfjs pleaded in the petition. Leamed counsel for the respdndents submits that case ofthe petitioner wouid aiso be considered on the saAie lines. In view ofthe statement made above, this petidon is finalty disposed cff with a direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the claim - •-22 an^i^T h-U'h 3Tlt?t ?h^i't> ^rf^T Deepti ^] '3's? •^l'illd*), "afll'u'is, (sicii'My 3TI^?T xraq? _......^tQ)...^,...^l *<iiwrgitii<<i 200 i^^s' sn^i ^giwaftg 9- of ihe petitioner for grant of two 21-09-1974 Issued by the State c facts pleaded in the petition within chN[<T1<11l +1H<*if'^ \k.^\ ^^\< ^s'Pcm aii^i advance increments as par circular dated f Madhya Pradesh, after verificatlon of the a period of efght weeks from today. Sd/'- Mamndra Mohaii Shrivastava Judge