Civil Revision No.5476 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5476 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 01.12.2010 Sushma and another ....Petitioners Versus Smt. Reena and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Ravi Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Bhag Singh, Advocate, for the respondents. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that petitioners are the co-owners of the property in dispute, hence moved an application for impleadment in the present suit. Learned counsel for the petitioners further states that petitioners have already filed suit for partition in which preliminary decree has already been passed. Since application seeking impleadment in the present suit has already been dismissed and suit filed by the petitioners for partition has been decreed, hence in the opinion of this Court any observation made in the present suit in which petitioners were not impleaded as defendants shall not adversely affect the rights of the petitioners. Any observation made in the impugned order rejecting the impleadment application shall Civil Revision No.5476 of 2010 (O&M) -2- also not affect adversely the petitioners. In view of this, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. (Alok Singh) Judge December 01, 2010 R.S.