Cy”- (57% 1 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (s) No 2] lé /2011 Petitioner : / Smt. Rinku Dutta, aged 47 years W/o S.S. Dutta Terminated Sr. Store Keeper Store Department, Bhilai Steel Plant, Bhilai. R/o House No. 117/5A Maitrai Nagar, Risali, Bhilai P.O. C.G. Bhilai, Dist. Durg Chhattisgarh Versus Respondents : / 1. The Managing Director Steel Authority of India Ltd Bhilai Steel Plant Bhilai Dist. Durg (C.G.) Shri Sanjeev Nair Deputy General Manager l OIC (MM. Stores) Disciplinary Authority Bhilai Steel Plant Bhilai Dist. Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORI, AND OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT(S) ORDER ETC. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 21 16 OF 2011 Petitioner Smt. Rinku Dutta y“) é VeFsus Respundents The Managing Director, Steel Authority of India Ltd. & Another WRIT PETiTiON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Single Bench : Hon’bie Shn' Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri P.K. Maitra and Shn' Amarnath Chakraborthy, Advocates for the petitioner. M, QRoFR_(ORAL) (Passed on {hispég‘h day of Aprii, 201 1) 1. it is not dispute that the petitioner is a workman, however. the petitioner has not taken recourse to the forum under the provisions of industrial Disputes Actt 1947 (for short “the ID Act. 1947") on the ground that initially the petitioner has come to this Court when charge-sheet was issued and this Court has passed some order. Thus. it would be proper to approach this Court only under Article 226 of the Constitution of. India. 2. Even if this Court has entertained the petition at eartier stage that does not debar the petitioner from approaching the appropriate statutory forum under the provisions of the ID Act, 1947. 3. There is no doubt that the petitioner is workman and according to the petitioner the appropriate forum against the order of dismissal would be the Labour Court under the provisions of the ID Act, 1947. The petitioner has'not established the fact that extra ordinary circumstances exist so asto invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution oi india. 4. Accordingly, this petition is not maintainabie and the writ petition is‘ dismissed at the motion stage itself. However, liberty is reserved to th petitioner to take recourse to statutory forum that may be available to him under the provisions of law. if so advised. i Sd/—' Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Arun e