IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 10428 of 2001 Between: A.Satyanarayana, S/o. Hanumanthu, Flat No. 503, Divyasakthi Apartments, Ameerpet , Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Bank of Baroda, Rep.by it's ARM Branch Chief Manager, Masab Tank Branch. 2 The Debts Recovery Tribunal , Hyderabad. 3 M/s.Virajitha Audio Video, Rep.by it's Prop: A.V.N .Prasad, Hyderabad. Not Necessary Party 4 A.V.Nagendra Prasad, Not necessary party 5 A.Krishna Murthy, Not necessary party 6 Mrs.K.Uma Bharathi, Not necessary party 7 Miss. A.Anuradha, Not necessary party .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned order dt.8-3-2001 made in I.A.No.1072/2000 in O.A.No.563/1999 on the file of the Debts Recovery Tribunal at Hyderabad (R.2) , as illegal, unfair, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice, contrary to law and procedure and unsusstainable, and set aside the same and pass such other consquential orders as may be considered just in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.SRINIVASA VARADA CHARY Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.K.NAGAMANI The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.P.No 10428 of 2001 O R D E R (PER HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH) This Writ Petition is filed by petitioner seeking to declare the impugned order dated 08-03-2001 made in I.A. No.1072 of 2000 in O.A. No.563 of 1999 on the file of Debts Recovery Tribunal at Hyderabad as illegal and arbitrary. 2. As there was no representation for the petitioner on 08-04-2009, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. In spite of the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, today also there is no representation for the petitioner. 3. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. The interim stay granted by this Court on 22.05.2001 shall stand vacated. _________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J __________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J DT.09.04.2009 KSH