1 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.354/10 Choru Ram vs. State of Raj. & ors. Date of order: 19.3.2010. HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. CP Trivedi for the petitioner. Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit for the respondents. .. Though the matter has been listed on the application moved under Article 226(3) of the Constitution of India, but in view of the fact that the petitioner did not disclose that before filing this writ petition against the transfer order dated 23.10.2009 and after the Tribunal's order dated 18.12.2009, he already complied with the transfer order and joined the duties on 31.12.2009, which is clear from Annex.R/1 produced by the respondents and is not disputed by the petitioner and further more that the petitioner also stated the wrong fact that the matter is similar to the S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10041/09, which was relating to the some transfer order passed for Patwari, for which separate rules are there governing the subject. The writ petition of the petitioner deserves to be dismissed. Therefore, because of suppression of the material facts, this writ petition is dismissed and the stay order dated 13.1.2010 is vacated. If the petitioner has been relieved by virtue of the order dated 13.1.2009 then the position is required to be restored as it was existing prior to 13.1.2010. ( PRAKASH TATIA),J. mlt.