THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.782 of 2002 DATED: 15-07-2010 ORDER: This revision is filed by the petitioner, who was examined as R.W.1, questioning the judgment, dated 31-01-2000, passed in M.C.No.89 of 1997 by the learned Family Judge, Vijayawada. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner and 1st respondent herein are husband and wife and the 2nd respondent is their son. Due to some disputes the 1st respondent herein-wife filed M.C.No.89 of 1997 under Section 125 Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance and the petitioner herein- husband filed O.P.No.98 of 1998 under Section 13(1) (ia) & (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, for dissolution of their marriage and the learned Family Judge, Vijayawada clubbed both the matters and after trial, vide judgment, dated 31-01-2000, while dismissing O.P.No.98 of 1998 allowed M.C.No.89 of 1997, awarding maintenance of Rs.500/-each to the respondents 1 and 2 herein. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner herein-husband filed the present revision. 3. Having analyzed the entire evidence on record, both oral and documentary, the learned Family Judge, granted maintenance to the respondents 1 and 2 herein as stated supra. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that the impugned order needs no interference. 4. Accordingly, Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. _______________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA,J 15th July, 2010. Tsy