IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2008 / 10TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 22470 of 2004(Y) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ P.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR, ELANPAZHATHU VEEDU, KULANGARA BHAGAM CHAVARA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY HOME SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KILIKOLLOOR POLICE STATION, KOLLAM. 4. THE KOLLAM TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KOLLAM. 5. THE KOLLAM CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE KOLLAM CORPORATION, KOLLAM. 6. THANKAPPAN PILLAI, S/O.NEELANDAN PILLAI, CHERUKUNNATH VEEDU, AGATHIL P.O., KOLLAM. 7. SUDESHAN, S/O. NANU, KUZHIKKANDATHIL, KILIKOLLOOR P.O., KOLLAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED ANZAR FOR R1 TO R4 ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHAN DAS,SC,KOLLAM CORP. FOR R5 ADV. SRI.O.V.RADHAKRISHNAN FOR R6 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).22470/2004-Y APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE PATTA ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 09/04/74. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE PATTA GIVEN TO THE PETITIONER'S FATHER. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE PLAN. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE PLAN ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 14/07/99. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 07/07/2004 TO THE PETITIONER ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P7: COPY OF THE EXPLANATION ON 20/07/2004. EXT.P8: COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 10/07/2007. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDE Rs/ KURIAN JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.22470 OF 2004 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of September, 2008. J U D G M E N T Actual grievance is on Exhibit P6. It is only a notice. It is for the petitioner, if still aggrieved, to respond to the notice issued by the 5th respondent. In the event of the petitioner responding to the notice within a period of one month from today, the matter will be duly considered by the 5th respondent with notice to the petitioner and any other affected party, expeditiously. Subject to the petitioner thus approaching the 5th respondent within a period of one month from today, the interim order passed by this Court will continue till orders are passed as above by the 5th respondent. This writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. smp KURIAN JOSEPH, J. W.P.(C) No. 22470 OF 2004 J U D G M E N T 01.09.2008