IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Revision No.1991 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 3.8.2009. Surender and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Jai Vir Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. RAJESH BINDAL J. **** The challenge in the present petition is to the Order passed by learned Court below whereby charges have been framed against the petitioners. Specific reference has been made to the charge framed under Section 307 IPC. Relying upon the opinion of the Doctor that the injury No.6 was found to be grievous if not treated. It was sought to be argued that the injury has to be dangerous to life and then charge only under Section 307 IPC can be framed. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner I do not find any ground to interfere in the present petition. Merely framing of charge does not prejudice the petitioners. The Court, after evidence is led by the parties, will appreciate the same before passing final judgment. The revision petition is dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 3.8.2009 JUDGE Reema