•^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLESHRIJAGDISHBHALLA,Ag.CJ.& HON'BLE SHRI DIUP RAOSAHEB DESHMUKH, J. APPELLANT: PEriTJONER RESPONDENTS: Writ ADpeaKPRrNo. 2292 of 2007 yyA- 1^6/6^ Smt. Vijay Laxmi, Wd/o - Late Shri J.N. Singh, aged about 58 years, R/o Ottalwar Bhawan, Tilak Nagar Chantapara, Bilaspur, Distt. Bitaspur (C.G.5 VERSUS ^. • • ' ' • • ••.'.••'.- 1. State Bank Of India Through : The . Chief General Manager, Head QfRce, Bhopal (M.P.) State Bank of India Through BankOfficer, Bilaspur (C.G.) Lead Writ appeal underSection 20') ofthe Chhsttisaarh Hiah Court (ApDealto DivisiocLBench). Act 2QQ6 Present: Shri Vlnay Pandey, counsel forthe appellant. Shri Sanjay K, Agrawal, learned counsel forthe respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on fflm.lune,2007) The following oral order of the Court was passed by Jagdish Bhalla, Ag. CJ. This writ appeal is direoted against the judgment of Hon'ble Single Judge dataJ 06-02-2007 whereby the writ petitlon was dismissed. The petitioner's husband was an employee of the respondent - bank left for heavenly abode In the year 1998. Thereafter the appellant - petitioner applied for the job with State Bank of India under the scheme wherein appointments are made on compassionate grounds. l-1erapplioation was considered and rejected by an orderdated 27-01-1999. Thereafter the appellant chose not to ohallenge the order onjudicial side, made another representation, whichaccording to:the appellart is still pending and has not ^,,,^ie*>seg^ -Ni &ibbu been decjded, Therefbre, on the inaotion of theauthoFities.'the petitioner has <' approached this Gourt: Hon'bleSingle Judge dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant by a reasoned order. We would like to add that the representation made by the appellant after rejeption of his ap£licati6nis not a statutory one. 1-lon'ble ApexCourt In fhe case of Sfate Bank of Indiaand Others Vs. Jaspal Kaur, reported in 2007(3)SCJ 448 held as under: "14. The Hlgh Court also failed to appreciate a well settled principle of law laid down by this Gourt in the oase ofU.C. oflndia v. ftsha RamchhandFa Amekar (Mrs) • and anoffier (1994) 2 SCC 718, that tlle Court cannot order appointment on compassipnate ground, de horsVne . provisionsof the statutory regulations and instructions and that hardship of the candidate does not entitle him to compassionate appointment efe hors the statutory provisibns.",' ; ': ':. :: •: ' l': " • ' ,'" •• ;1. •: •' Further in tight.ofthe abov&judgment, this Court neither can sit in appeal against the view takeh by the bank nor .the incymbent has any statutory .right ftir the appoiritment: VVe-are in agreement with the view expressed by l-lori'ble Single .Judge,: Acoordirigly, the writ appeal.is dismissed. It isolarifiedthatthedismissal ofthis appealwill notcome in fhe way ofthe bahk authorities to take any view on the representation made by the,agpellg.nts. _.... Sd/- ; - 1 ' '} Ag^^hieBustioe SdA . DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ^"-^^ Jf B*'