IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 840 of 2005 1. Bhuwan Chandra S/o Jagannath R/o Village-Kimari At present near Mosta Mandir Patti P.S. and Tehsil Pati, Distt. Champawat 2. Man Mohan S/o Dan Singh R/o village Raulmail At Present at Pati P.S. and Tehsil Pati, District Champawat 3. Rajendra Singh S/o Daleep Singh R/o Village Pati, P.S. and Tehsil Pati District Champawat. 4. Bhuwan Chandra R/o Village Lara Patwari Kshetra Pati P.S. and Tehsil Pati, Distt. Champawat. ….Applicants. Vs. 1. State of Uttaranchal 2. Sessions Judge, Champawat 3. Judicial Magistrate, Champawat 4. Rami Ram, S/o Shri Heera Ram R/o Village Koor, Patwari Kshetra Bhumwari Tehsil Pati, Distt. Champawat. …Respondents. Shri M.C. Pande, learned counsel for the applicants. Learned Government Advocate for respondent No. 1 to 3. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. 1. This is a petition, moved under Section 482 of code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the petitioners for quashing the charge sheet-Annexure 1 and criminal proceedings arising out thereof under Section 3(1) (X) S.C. and S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, read with Sections 504, 506 of I.P.C. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. 3. It is argued on behalf of the petitioners that they are innocent and have falsely been implicated by the respondent No. 4 to humiliate them. Since after investigation, charge sheet has been filed and it is for the trial court to examine after recording the evidence if the charge is proved or not. Even before that at the time of framing of the charge, the petitioners are at liberty to show if the offences are not made out against them. It is not just and proper on the part of this Court to appreciate the half baked evidence to quash the charge sheet. Learned counsel for the petitioners also drew my attention to Annexure No. S.A.-1 to Supplementary Affidavit, which is a copy of the report of the District Magistrate, Champawat addressed to Secretary, Uttaranchal S.C. and S.T. Commission, Dehradun, which includes following report:- ^^-------------------f}rh; lfefr dks 120 cSx lhesUV miyC/k djkdj dk;Z 'kq: djus gsrq dgk x;kA foHkkx }kjk fcuk okLrfodrk dh tkWp djs rFkk fcuk dk;Z foHkktu fd;s dk;Z 'kq: djus ds funsZ”k nsuk vkSfpR;ghu ik;k x;k rFkk blh dkj.k ;kstuk esa fookn gqvkA nksuksa lfefr;ksa }kjk bPNkuqlkj dk;Z 'kq: dj fn;k x;k] foHkkx dk rduhdh ekxZ n”kZu Hkh ugha fy;k x;kA Izk”uxr xwy ds vUrxZr vkUks okyh Hkwfe esa xzke dw.k] HkqEok.kh] eSjkyh] yM+k] jksyesy ds vuqlwfpr tkfr rFkk lo.kZ tkfr ds yksx lg[kkrsnkj ds :I esa ntZ gSA Hkwfe ds dyeh caVokjs ugha gq, gSA Hkwfe ekSds ij catj gS dksbZ vkokl rFkk [ksrh ugha gSA----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- y?kq flapkbZ foHkkx }kjk xwy fuekZ.k gsrq 'kklukns”k ds vuqlkj izfdz;k ugha vikuk;h x;h gSA fookn dks gy fd;s tkus gsrq flapkbZ dek.M ,fj;k ds lHkh dkLrdkjksa dh ,d lfefr lEcfU/kr vf/kdkfj;ksa dh mifLFkfr esa xzke lHkk dh [kqyh cSBu esa lfefr ds izkf/kdkfj;ksa dk pquko cgqer ds vk/kkj ij fd;ks tkus gsrq lacaf/kr foHkkx dks vko”;d funsZ”k fn;s x;s gSA** The above fact can also be appreciated by the trial court when the petitioners filed it in defense. 4. For the reasons as discussed above, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned criminal proceedings. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. However, it is directed that if the petitioners surrender before the court concerned and move bail applicant, the same be disposed of without unnecessary delay. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt: 21.12.2005 Sweta