1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 3499/ 2009 [Mohemmod Ali Mohd. Hussain Turak .vrs. State of Maharashtra] ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. S.M.Ukey, Advocate, for the applicant, Mr. S.S.Wandile, APP for respondent. .......... CORAM : P.D. KODE, J. DATE : DECEMBER 05, 2009. Heard. Learned APP has objected the application on the ground that the investigation is in progress. The court, for the reasons recorded in the order dated 18th November, 2009, had issued an ad-interim order. Having regard to the facts and circumstances involved and the reasons given earlier and taking into account the nature of the dispute and the role alleged by the applicant, ad-interim direction deserves to be confirmed as perusal of the case diary does not reveal any further significant circumstance revealed for reconsidering the direction already given. However, since the investigation is said to be pending, necessary rider will be required to be imposed for safeguard the right of the prosecution. Ad-interim direction given vide order dated 18th 2 November, 2009, is hereby confirmed up till filing of the charge sheet in the relevant crime on the same terms & conditions imposed by the said order. Liberty to the prosecution to apply in accordance with law for cancellation/modification of the direction. Application stands disposed of. Criminal Application No. 372/2009 In view of the disposal of the main application, this application also stands disposed of. JUDGE Rvjalit