^/2- (&^- W8g IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION^IS) No, SS^^ OF2009 PETITIONER ^^^^s^ '-wl-?"\y>' K'--)"" .•'i^i ;''"*'i_ \' i--'-""~ RESPONDENTS Smt. Seema Manisha Nath, Aged about 45 years, W/o Shri A.S. Nath, Occupation - Service, Working as Assistant Professor (English), Government Science College, Bilaspur, R/o Rajendra Nagar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh VERSUS /' 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Higher Education, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Commissioner, Directorate of Higher Education, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Principal, Government Science College, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4. Shri S.K.Tripathi, Assistant Professor (English) Government Science College, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS OR THE LIKE 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PE: /• HIGH COUR'rQFCHHAmSGhLATBlLASPUR (Hon. Mr, Justice Pritinker Diwaker) VERSUS Smt. Seema Manisha Nath State of Chhattisgarh and others. Shri Ranbir Singh Marhas counsel for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. A.G. & Shri Shashank Thakur, PL for the respondents/State. :RARTICLE22SOF THECQNSTiTUTlQNOF With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the matter is heard rinaily. Q (Annexure has been Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 30.6.2009 P-1) passed by respondent No.1 whereby the petitioner transferred from Government Science PG College, Government Coliege, Bemetra ,on administrative grounds. Counsel for the petitioner submits that in the present plaee of posting the petitioner has joined after being transferred by order dated 30.6.2008. He submits that her husband is aiso a government servant and Is working as Range Officer, Kanhan Pendari, Bilaspur and after much a'ifficuify the couple coula' get the posfing at one place. He submits thaf the impugned order has been issued just to accommociate Tespondent No.4. Counsel for the petitioner "submits that the petitioner rn.sy be permitted to withdraw this petitioh v/rth Siberty to make representation. He aiso seeks a direction to the authorities concerned to decide the sald representatlon expeditiously. To this prayer of the petitloner, counsel for the respondents/State has no objection. Accordingiy, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. If the petitioner makes a representation within a period of 10 I .^,^ 3isfs 1^ .^: I— days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same would be decided by the authorities concerned within a further period of three weeks from the date of its receipt strictiy in accordance with law. Tilf then no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge ^•^