1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47517 of 2008 1.MUNMUN TIWARY SON OF LATE KEDAR TIWARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHARAMPURA,P.S.NOKHA (DHARAMPURA O.O.), DISTRICT ROHTAS (SASARAM) 2.RAVI SHANKAR PANDEY @ BHIKHARI SON OF LATE GAURI SHANKAR PANDEY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PITHANI,P.S.DINARA,DISTRICT ROHTAS(SASARAM) Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 6.2.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. and learned counsel appearing for the informant. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case which has been registered for offences under Sections 498A,323,379 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Submission is that petitioner no.1 is Fufa and petitioner no.2 is uncle of the husband of the informant. Further submission is that the husband of the informant is in jail custody and some other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners has been opposed by learned counsel appearing for the informant. Considering the relationship of the petitioners with the husband of the informant, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named petitioners are directed to surrender before the court below within twenty days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of order and on their so surrendering, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, 2 2 Rohtas at Sasaram in Kochas P.S.Case No. 115 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)