^T-? XI-HC—78 ^ST •<ll'4lcl't|, ®tily'is,fsjdiy^ "^, STI^TIR^C •m^t^if^'iw 'cTs^ Sfl^T^^icn ^rafer'ft'i'wrof'? ^siRroan^ (Single Bench; Hon'bl^ Mr. Justice bhirendra Mishral w.p. rst (Petition U/A 226/2 PFTITIONER Vs RESPONDENTS B.R. Sd about 5'; Irrigatii (C6) 1. Stati Secr D.K.; 2. Secr Vibhi Raipi 3. Join1 Vika; Distr Present: Mr. Saleem Kazi, Advocate for th< Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advocatej 16.10.2008 The instant petition is direj of Annexure P-2 whereby the | deputation in the Department o1 Mo.6430/2006 f7 of Constitution of India) i^i, S/o Shri Hari Ram Sahu, aged years, Assistant Engineer, R/o 6-1, ji Colony, Rudri, District Dhamtari of Chhattisgarh, through- the ;tary, Water Resources Department, Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur. stary, Panchayat and (Sramin Vikas g, b.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, bistrict Secretary, Panchayat and Gramin Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, ict Raipur (C6) petitioner. Seneral for the State. :ted against the order- dated 14.09.2006 etitioner, who was already working on Panchayat and Rural, Raipur, has been ^ ..-.^&^. ^•-'•S^S'^f. ^ 3 '%^ '*ir.ai»' '^fasssss''" XI-HG—78 TST '*iwwil, ytily'iio, fs|<rll-LI^< TTan 3n^?r £»i*ii<^ '•»>i«i!n«iit'siRrff^ fs^ •d^i^H i; further posted on deputation in (•he Watep Management Division, Rudri, dated 14.9.2006, so far it relates District Dhamtari. Mr. Thakur, learned &ep^ity Advocate Seneral for the State submits that the State has no (jbjection if the order of Annexure P-2 to the petitioner, is quashed. In view of above submiss?on, the order of Annexure P-2 dated 14.9.2006, so far it relates to t|ie petitioner herein, is hereby quashed. $tate to pass any order in relation to the However, it shall be open to the petitioner's services under admin [strative exigenaes. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge T^^)