THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.6198, 6369 and 6917 OF 2009 Dated : 12.11.2009 Crl.P.No.6198 of 2009 Between : Pollu Subbaiah & another ….. Petitioners/R.2 and R.3 a n d P.Sree Latha & others ….. Respondents Crl.P.No.6369 of 2009 Between : G.Pushpavani ….. Petitioner/R.5 a n d P.Sree Latha & others ….. Respondents Crl.P.No.6917 of 2009 Between : Smt.Poludasu Umamaheswari ….. Petitioner/R.4 a n d P.Sree Latha & others ….. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.6198, 6369 and 6917 OF 2009 COMMON ORDER : Crl.P.No.6198 of 2009 is filed by R.2 and R.3, Crl.P.No.6369 of 2009 is filed by R.5 and Crl.P.No.6917 of 2009 is filed by R.4 in D.V.C.No.1 of 2009 on the file of the Additional Munsiff Magistrate, Chilakaluripeta, seeking to quash proceedings against them therein. 2) Heard. 3) Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that no relief is claimed against these petitioners and as such DVC is not maintainable against these petitioners. 4) Petitioners herein are the parents-in-law and other relatives of t h e de facto complainant. The reliefs claimed are monthly maintenance, shelter in a shared household, etc. The allegations against the petitioners are that the schedule property is gifted by the husband of the de facto complainant in favour of his sister and she is in possession of the property and the parents-in-law of the complainant are admittedly residing in the said property. As such, the contentions of the learned counsel for the petitioners cannot be accepted. 5) Therefore, all the three criminal petitions are dismissed and it is directed that D.V.C.No.1 of 2009 shall be disposed of expeditiously by the trial Court and the petitioners are at liberty to take all the pleas taken before this Court before the trial Court. ______________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J 12th November, 2009 SUR