IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No : 35991 of 1998 Between: 1 R. Radha S/o. Late Munaswami r/o. at D.No. 19-533, Nehru Street Vellore Road, Chittoor, Chittoor Dist. 2 M.G. Prakash S/o. P. Mani r/o. D.No. 6-138, Elama Street, Santhapet, Chittoor, Chittoor Dist. 3 V. Soundarajan S/o. Late E. Vadivelu r/o. D.No. 10-571, Ammam Koil Pedda harijanawada, Chittoor, Chittoor Dist. 4 B. Sankar S/o. B. Valliappan R/o. D.No. 24-264, Satyanarayanapuram, Chennammagudipalle Post, Chittoor, Chittoor Dist. 5 P. Jyothipal S/o. J. Ponnurangam r/o. P.H. Babuji Nagar, Iruvaram Post, Chittoor, Chittoor dist. 6 K. Gangaiah S/o. K. Mogilaiah r/o. Gangasaram, Reddigunta Post, Chittoor, Chittoor Dist. 7 P. Ramachandriah S/o. P. Krishniah residing at Poonepalle Village & PO, Penumur Mandal, Chittoor Dist. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Principal Secretary to Government Municipal Admn. & Urban Development Department A.P., Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Chittoor Chittoor District. 3 The Commissioner Chittoor Municipality, Chittoor. 4 The Chairman Chittoor Municipality Chittoor, Chittoor Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any writ or direction or order, more particularly in the nature of Writ of Certiorari to quash the proceedings of the 1st Respondent issued in Memo.No. 19283/G2/97-5, MA, dt. 31-8-1998 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of nature justice and consequently directing the 1st Respondent to regularise the services of petitioners in 3rd Respondent Municipality and to pay the salary on par with other permanent employees in the Municipality and to continue their services in the Chittoor Municipality while making payment of their wages or else we will suffer irreparable loss and hardship. Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri P. Raghavendra Reddy Counsel for the Respondents : Government Pleader for Municipal Administration & Urban Development The Court made the following O R D E R: Sri P. Raghavendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and, therefore, the same may be dismissed as infructuous. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, but however, without costs. (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO,J) 27th February 2008 ksld ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{NR}