( 1 ) sa517.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 517 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11921 OF 2011 Laxmikant s/o. Dattatraya Dadpe .. Appellant Versus Wamanrao s/o. Dattatraya Dadpe .. Respondent Mr. N.P. Patil-Jamalpurkar, Advocate for the appellant; Mr. C.R. Deshpande, Advocate for sole respondent. CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 11.10.2011 P.C. :- 1. This appeal is filed against concurrent findings of the Courts below that the respondent/plaintiff proved his title to the suit property and therefore he has succeeded in getting the decree for eviction of the appellant, who happens to be his brother. The appellant took up a stand in written statement that the suit house did not belong to the respondent though it stood in his name. It was his case that their father Dattatraya purchased this property ostensibly in the name of the respondent/plaintiff. The respondent, however, could prove that it was he who could purchased the suit property. His case as said above was believed by the Courts below. No substantial question of law involved in ( 2 ) sa517.11 the Second Appeal. The Second Appeal stands dismissed. 2. In view of dismissal of the Second Appeal, connected Civil Application for stay does not survive and stands disposed of. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] snk/2011/OCT11/sa517.11