^ -^^3/0 tfe^ ^^g^g^fABHYA KR^I^.ri^KISS^^ ^Jgpfttr sEA£ffiSS. ©*A<^.:1^-/1995 I^^L^GANT. t Sliri Abdul ReMffi Qttre^ii, aged el»ut 58 years, Sale Sax Offieer, Sales Sax Butldiia&, Bila^yr» Cli?ele «2, Si^^BR., M»P« RS^>ONDEMTSt 1» gitate @£ M»P»tiapwigfr Seei?etaiy ©epsiRtnieat ef Scper&te Bfrveiaae Va3JA;te Bhawafi, fihepal* 2, GoaMEtsstoiaer @f Sales tax I&deap@»M*P• 51 Sfart ABaat PrasaA atetiKia» St^.e^ Tax @f£icer> SteaNtel. 4» R&gfeiavffadEa Ihal»ey»Sales Taac Ofttcer> Serufclay Gelt aa^tey®. §¥8hrt ahiwr Ba^ SfaaaaRa» Sales Saac ©ff^oer, Wala »2 ©•Slu?t Aatl Kuaca? Ittatora, iSales Tax ©ftl©er» Raigyr • 4» 7% 8hri Basiesfewsr M&^r«»Sal&a Tax @fft©^p, Kfeaadwa, ®$Sfari H83?t|te Kaaar ShaBaa, S63.®»^wc ©ftleer, a^d®rel»'5i. ' , ' Stet JaseteiiJShaa'aa ©ugfr&S&lfeft Taac ©ffleer, ©•C»B^3«®Sa^®a^Bd^' lOt Shrt Kpaiteeo Ka^QB^ra ®eea^>Sales Tax ©ffieer ladere * 2^ 1'ttShri Wnay KuadP Bhatt» Sales 2a^ ©^te«r» ®urg- 2»' 12f 89ari 8sE6y«xdra Kaffiar Kai^ada, Salec Sax ©ffic^?,Jatea3,pw <a?aAe »4« 15»Shailaadra Kiaaar Mlsla?&» Sa3ifts Tttx Otfie^r, ®tl&%>^P- 2» 14» Shri Badri NaFayaa, Sales Tay @filic»r, Seadbwa. @pa^ei • 15» isaspl ®ieelCtaa^ ^aia^ Saae^ tast ©ifleer, ^abalpar - ^g 16| Shr^ Krlatott ISflixaa Paa» , Sales Sax Offte^r, G»P«Ssgraga^a. 17» SteS. Ra» Gfaaadra A<?'awat» 8&2®s2a3£ ©«Sic«p, Audit, Sataa^ 18» aairt Pfatra'fe 8aa B^i B®afc»Ssdfta tay QffAeer, Chfaiadwaray „ . 3 s 2 t 19«Sterl Etaa Narayan ©ttwaagan»®&3tos®ax@ffi©er» Ra3aaad|S!a©a« 20» Stori Ravladra l&anar 8fart»astavft, Sales Sax ©tfleer»Jatealpur - 211 Shri ^airsefe Stia^i Veriaa, Saaes ^ac ©f^tew, Jabalpur. 228 ShrJL Nohaa Sto^i GhettbaB, Sales fs^ @ffte®r> .Bewas Glrole®' ~ • :• 23» Stei Erafehafear Shivhaape, S&3AS 'Dax ©ftJ.Ger> r»S»JHABOA» 2^ SBari ladre Pal Ote Ja&o, 8ales Isae ©ffieer Jabalpur • 2» 25. Bawaash Prasad Shai?ma» Sales Tax Qffteer» F»S» SaEfcnaf ©R^AILS.OB? ^HE AgPI^SC^II^ s!» ,...«As—«-—. .— aa ^ ! HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 775 of 2005 Petitioner Shri Abdul Rahim Qiireshi Versus Respondents State of M. P. (uow Chhattisgarh) & ofhers (AppUcation U/S 19 oftheAdmmistrative Tribunals Act, 1985) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) None for fhe petitioner. Ms Snuta Ghai, Paael Lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDERtoralt ( Passed on this 14th day ofSeptember, 2009) 1. 2. Thakur The matter is called for hearing twice. On both fhe occasions none appears nor aciy reprcsentation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested m prosecutmg fhe matter, In view of fhe foregoiag, fhe petiUon is dismissed for waat of prosecution. A copy of fhis order shaU be sent to the petitioner forfhwifh. — Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge