IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8402 of 2009 ABDUL WADOOD SON OF LATE MD. HANIF A RESIDENT OF MAKHDUM RASTI NAGAR COLONY, HOLDING NO.18, POST OFFICE AND POLICE STATION – PHULWARI SHARIF, DISTRICT – PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVERMNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE FINANCE COMMISSIONER-CUM-PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DEHRI ROHTAS. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER DRAINAGE AND INVESTIGATION DIVISION, MOTIHARI. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SONE CANAL MODERNISATION DIVISION, SASARAM CAMP, DEHRI DISTRICT ROHTAS. 6. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RANCHI, JHARKHAND. 7. THE CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT JHARKHAND HAVING OFFICE IN ICHA GALU DIH COMPLEX ADITYAPUR, JAMSHEDPUR 7. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KHARKAI CANAL DIVISION, RAJ NAGAR, DISTRICT SINGHBHUM, JHARKHAND. 9. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, ROHTAS AT SASARAM. ----------- 07. 25.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State of Jharkhand and the State of Bihar. Mr. N.N. Ojha learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 6,7 and 8 produced the original bank draft no. 197556 amounting to Rs. 78,907 dated 09.03.2010 issued by State Bank of India, Seraikela and payable at State Bank of India, Service Branch, Patna. The said bank draft has been handed over in Court to Mr. A.B. Ojha, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner. Xerox -copy of the said bank draft has been annexed as Annexure R/1 to the Second supplementary counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent nos. 6,7 and 8. The aforesaid amount represents the compound interest, calculation of which has been given in Annexure R/2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has three objections :- firstly that on perusal of the aforesaid claim interest chart at Annexure- R/2, the interest have been paid till 31st of December 2009, secondly, that the rate of interest is not correct and thirdly, that there is no mention of the interest for the period 2000-01 and its consequential effect. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid three discrepancies shall be put before the Respondent no. 8 for consideration by way of representation. In case such representation is filed within a period of six weeks, the same shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation. Upon consideration claims if any, is found payable, the same shall be paid to the petitioner. This writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)