IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 27TH JUNE 2011 / 6TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 7288 of 2004(P) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. M.K. POULOSE, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O. KURIAKOSE, R/AT BHEEMANADY VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. (A.S.I. OF POLICE, NILESHWAR POLICE STATION) 2. P. KRISHNAN NAIR, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O. KUNHAMBU NAIR, R/AT BELLA VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. (ASI OF POLICE DIST.SPECIAL BRANCH, KASARAGOD.) 3. T. SREEDHARAN NAIR, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O. KUNHAMBU NAIR, R/A KARADAKKA VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT (HC 273 BEKAL POLICE STATION.) 4. M.P. SUKUMARAN NAMBIAR, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O. CHERAKKARA KUNHAMBU NAIR, R/A PILICODE VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. (HC 634 HOSDURG POLICE STATION) BY ADV. SRI.KODOTH SREEDHARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KASARAGOD. 4. SUBAIDA, WOMEN S.I. OF POLICE, KASARAGOD POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD. GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.SANDESH RAJA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).No. 7288/2004 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS P1. COPY OF THE ORDER DTD.NIL. 1/2002. P2. COPY OF THE ORDER DTRD.22.9.03. P3. COPY OF THE D.O. DTD.15.10.03 BY R3. P4. COPY OF THE GOVT. ORDER DTD.23.12.96. sdk+ ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 7288 of 2004 ================== Dated this the 27th day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T This writ petition was admitted as early as on 3.3.2004. At that time the learned Government Pleader took notice for respondents 1 to 3. Although notice was ordered to the 4th respondent, the petitioners did not take steps to serve notice on the 4th respondent. When the matter was posted before the Registrar (Judicial) for defects on 13.6.2011, the petitioners requested for two days' time and time was granted up to 20.6.2011. It is because the petitioners did not cure the defects within that time also, this matter has been posted in the defects list of this court today. The defect still survives. Today, when the matter was taken up, none appears for the petitioners. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge