IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR W.P.N0. 38 l 6 ' /2003 / Smt Radhabai, widow of Late Premlal Gore, aged about 23 years, resident of Katrapara, Vikash Khand — Odgi, Tah. Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja, presently residing at : Village — Samaniya (Kapu) , Ta‘h. i Dharamj aigarh, Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. The Commissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, ‘Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur Mantralay, (Chhattisgarh) The Collector, District Surguja (Chhattisg'arh) . Assistant Commissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, Ambikapur, distt. Surguj (Chhattisgarh) . The Block Education Offi Education Block, Odgi, PETITIONER a- c T' EESPONDENT NO o 6 pk 3 UNION G? INDIA. TPROUGH 3 TH SECRETARY, DEFARTMENT OF PERSGNNEL; PUEIJC GRIEVANCE AND PERSONNEL THIRH FLOOR, LQKNKYAK BH£WAN. KHAN WKET, NEW DELHI. S‘rA‘I‘E Q? MDHYA FRABE5H, RESPONDENT NO '7 4 Dswm‘w‘r or TRIBAL WELFARE; WE Emm. MADHYA pmmsa, wBHQP3L E , This case relates to compassion te appointment ccinsequent upon the death of an employee sewing in the State v Learned counsel for the petitione categorically stated that in this case, the death of the employee has occurred on or after 131 1-1997 and not earlier. lt is further submitted that in_ batch of cases bearing WP. No1322/ 002 involving the same question orders have been passed by this Court on 20/1 2/2005. He‘ rays that similar orders may be passed in this case also. Learned counsel for the State does not dispute the above fact and state that the State of Chhattisgarh has taken a decisiontto consider the cases of dependants of those employees who died on or after 1/1 1/19 7 strictly in accordance with the policy prevalent at thattime. in view of the submissions ma e by learned counsel appearing for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the m rits of the case, in the opinion ofthis Court, ends of justice will be served if a direction is ‘giv n to the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities concerned to consider and decide the se of the petitioner in accordance with the policy prevalent at thetime of death of the e pioyee concerned. if the petitioner found eligible, appointment orders will be issued as early as possible on or before 30‘" April, 2006. The petitioner is also directed to render due cl any grievance still remains, the petitior including tiling ofthe petition'before this ( With the aforesaid observations, t Certified copy as per rules. Copy to the State counsel, who respondents for compliance. sdl- Fakhruddin Judgei 3-operation to the authorities. lt is made clear that if er may avail the remedy available under the law :ourt. his petition stands disosed of. p will be obliged to communicate the order to the [stew XI—HC’22 3a vim-w. WW WEN? W3? 5 f7 MC, 38 H2 #13 . ..................................... Wm ‘a’i 200 .............................................. g Kg ................................................ 3??? 411 Jréw #rtvm 3m mm W?! Wm ma} x3. fgvft "(fag 21 -1 2-2005 Petmoner by Shrt Dr N 3AM Shn Vivek Sharma‘ Panel Lawyer Ef‘cjr the Stétdefocate' Heard.