fy. S.B. fService Matter) INTHEttlGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISG^ARH) WRITPETITION (S) N030^/2011. PETITIONER: ^ Jeetrain Sahu, son of Budram Sahu, aged about 54 years, working as Head Master, Govt. Middle School Kurkuri, Block Kasdole, Education District Baloda Bazar, District Raipur, Chhatdsgarh. versus Respondents ^^: ^^^<^y ^?y .^x^ X^ty^^ ^^^ ..^-•^^" ^r ss'' >•• ^/ y..- ^^•" .'e1. 1. 2. 3. 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. -ElTstrict Education OfScer, District BalodaBazar, Chhattisgarh. 3. Block Education Officer, Kasdole, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. WRtT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2260F THE CONSTITUTION OP INDIA PARTICULARS OFTHE PETITIONER: As mentioned in the Cause title. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: As mentioned in the Cause title. PARTICULARS OF THE CAUSE/ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE PETmON IS MADE/ SUSJJEGT M^n'ERIN BRIEF. 1.1111 "ni -:ii'rKi!;?tL~" w'ftfflii iLB-iJlH .^i. .--^'.;;jlMl@^gM^i':^^;' l<^w:ri; ^ ;.'A;'.;',i®^l; XI-HC—78 an^l^lil R-li'* 'iT^n 3TT^?T ?ti*iiq> T5T "4i<ii<ri<i, giil'M're, fqc'ii'M^ ^...Mf^J....3.0^7M.!... ^Wv\t *l<|cb -•---—-—••••••-'••'---•^ 200 sn^r Tw? (lic<fd°<'i?) TOTOIT ^fsa aii^i [SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra 16.6.2011 Shri K. P. Sahu, counse| Shri Y.8. Thakiff, ctii<<I<n<ili TTITRff ^ fe^ <F;i1^i< ^?3ififl?3II^CT Mohan Shrivastava, J.1 for the petitioner. Dv. Advocate General for fhe State/respondents, on advanit®copy. Heard on admission. Leamed counsel appea^ing for fhe petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to bi account of he having pas inefit of two advance increments oh ^ed B.T.I examination before his MRJR /Sg 59. It is further submittedl stmilar view in its ordet appointment at his own co^t. It is submitted that fhe issue involved in fhe present petit^on is no longer res integra and tlie same has been fmaUy decidep by the Hon'ble Supreme Gourt ia the case of Asha Saxena. v^. State ef M.P. SaJOrs., 2009 {HS fhat fhis Court has also taken a dated 06-02-2009 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. ^eamed counsel for the petttioner further draws attention of fh|is Court to order dated 29-04-2010 passed tn Writ Appeal No.12^ of 2009, wherein relying iipon the judgnaent of fhe Supreiae (pourt in the case of Asha Sasena (supra) and fhe order passed No.87/2009, directions have by this Court in another Writ Appeal been issued for consideration of fhe ^' qh1:*. fV ^' XI-HC—78 7°^ "41-41CI*!, yiilwie, .fqcii'My *ii*«:tT*t(rai V% 200 sn^n^T (^?f3^ET) sn^r ^ii f<-fi<<i 'cT^TT STI^T st)+licft Pr<aareen TOIIW ^iftff an^r case for grant of two advanc^ 21-09-1974 issued by the verification of the facts pleade^ cr»l-qT<"i<Hl 'RW^if ^f fs%^ •(.^i^K ^aTRnan^r increments as per circular dated State of Madhya Pradesh, after tn fhe petition. Leamed coiinsel for th^ respondents submits fhat case of the petitioner woiild also be co|asidered on the same Unes. In view of fhe stateiufent made above, this petition is flnally disposed off wifh a dlre(stion to the respondent authorities to consider and decide fhe cla^m of the petitioner for grant of two advance increments as per cuj'cular dated 21-09-1974 issued by the State of Madhya Prade! (h, after verification of the facts pleaded in the petitiori, lyifhin) date of receipt of eopy of this ot'der. a period qf (hree raonfhs froiu the Z^alSanstlrisastava ^^ra^£ --\'': t\