THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.23477 of 2005 Date : 24-01-2011 Between : L.Venugopal .. Petitioner And The Zaheerabad Municipal Council, Zaheerabad, Medak District, rep. by its Commissioner .. Respondent THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.23477 of 2005 ORDER : This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the proceedings, dated 04-10-2005 in File No.G1/556/2005 of the respondent rejecting the application of the petitioner for grant of construction of a building, as illegal. The petitioner claims to have purchased house property bearing House No.2-1-76 on an extent of 33.33 and 38.88 square yards of land by registered document Nos.2470 and 2467, dated 13-06-2005 from the original owners. Thereupon, he submitted an application on 08-08-2010 seeking permission for making additional constructions thereon. That application has been rejected by means of impugned order on the ground that the petitioner has not submitted proceedings relating to mutation of his name from the original owners. It appears from the material produced in this Writ Petition that subsequent to the passing of the said order, the petitioner has submitted number of documents along with his letter, dated 22-10-2005 to establish his title in respect of the said property. Be that as it may, subsequent thereto, the respondent-municipality has issued a Notice No.G1/BPS-2008, dated 27-05-2008 to the petitioner directing him to avail the opportunity to get the unauthorised constructions/deviations regularised under the relevant orders issued by the State Government. In view of this subsequent development, the learned counsel for the petitioner Sri C.V.Bhaskar Reddy does not insist the disposal of this Writ Petition on merits, rather seeks permission to avail the remedy in terms of the said notice. The counsel also submits that the petitioner has already submitted application and awaiting orders thereon. In the circumstances, this Writ Petition is disposed of as unnecessary. The petitioner is permitted to pursue his application before the respondent and in the event of the orders going adverse to him, he may avail such remedy as is available to him under law. In view of later development, it is also open to the respondent-municipality to consider the application filed by the petitioner for granting the construction permission in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J. 24th January, 2011 skmr