1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2980 OF 2009 Laxman S/o Bhaurao Khoje Versus State of Maharashtra and another *** Mr. S. J. Salunke, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. K. M. Suryawanshi, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED: 8th SEPTEMBER, 2009. 1. Heard learned counsel for the accused/ applicant. The applicant Laxman is the owner of fair price shop under licence from the competent authorities. The rice, the commodity, which was in 264 bags, was allegedly taken charge from the godown belonging to the accused/ applicant for which there are statement of the witnesses. The investigation, at this stage, implicate the accused/ applicant. It may be that the accused has earlier clear record or that his official record maintained by him does not show any overt act of removing or 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. possessing 264 bags of the rice but at this stage of the matter same cannot be a parameter. Consequently, no pre-arrest bail. Application rejected. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:08/09/2009. ans/2980