HIGH COURT OF CHHATH$GARH AT BILA$PH§§ ISB: Hon’bEe MnTPSharmaH CRMP NO. 59 of 2008 Mr. Laiit Jangde counsel for the petitioner war. Pankaj Sh¥§vas* v” PL m' tha res” .dcnt he 1i5tutt. Mr. Uttam Fandey counsel tor the respondent No.2 pETmow uNDER SECTION 482 OF THE cone oi: cammm. emcee-wee {O R D E R) (06.12 .2008Q This netition has been filed against the order dated 143.2007 passed by the Additionai Sessions Judqe‘ Durg in Criminal Revision No. 265i2006. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has also tiied the civil suit for declaration and injunction which is pending in the Court of Civii Judoe. 3. Taking into consideration the\pendency of the civii suit for declaration and iniunction filed bv the petitioner. i do not find any ground-for invoking extra ordinarv iurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 4. Consequently, the petition being without substance is iiabie to be dismissed as it is hereby dismissed. Sdl T. P. Sharma We Judge i l \ E? PETITIONER Shaiiendra Mishra S/o Ramnivas lMmlmm “mum, aged aacut ’2” ms R/G E WE. 11H Housmg Board Jamul Bhnaa, Tah. 3: Distk. Dum Ia “'3 \V-‘v-I a \ VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1 . State of Chhattisqarh Throuah Station IIll-C:‘ai'§$, 055331, gb§elu-ahuan, Ia'W & Dist! Uurg (0.6 ) 2. Raiesh Kumar Mishra Sio Shri Videsh thy/{IShI , Riki IiGLiSe NO 275. 2??, S. .fiti Nagar, Bhlial fan & Unstt Durg {L (J )