IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.33 of 2009 Pancha alias Pancha Tanti alias Parmeshwar Tanti, son of Khagesh Tanti, resident of Vill. Lathane, P.S. Jamui, District- Jamui. -------------(Opposite Party)Petitioner VERSUS 1. Pramila Devi, Wife of Pancha alias Parmeshwar Tanti and daughter of late Bishundeo Tanti 2. Reeta Kumari (Minor) daughter of Pancha alias Parmeshwar Tanti under the guardianship of her mother Opposite Party No.1 Pramila Devi through her mother Opposite Party No.1 Pramila Devi, Both resident of vill.- Lathane , P.s.- Jamui, District- Jamui, Presently residing at Vill.- Barabank, P.S. –Sikandara, District- Jamui. ------(Applicant)opp. Parties ----------- 2. 19-Jan-09 Heard Mr. V.R.P.Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 8.9.2008 passed in Maintenance Case No.28M of 2001 of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Jamui whereby the Opposite Party- Petitioner has been directed to pay Rs.1,000/- per month by way of maintenance in a proceeding U/S 125 Cr.P.C. In Raj Kumar Sah Vrs. The State of Bihar & Anr. reported in 2008 (4) PLJR 817, a Division Bench of this Court, of which I was also a Member, has held that the order passed by the Family Court in an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C., a revision application under Section 19 (4) of the Family Court Act, 1984 is fit to be registered as Criminal Revision. 2 I, thus, hold that this Civil Revision application is not maintainable in view of the aforesaid decision of the Division Bench of this Court. However, as prayed, the petitioner is granted liberty to convert this Civil Revision application into a Criminal Revision within two weeks, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. chauhan (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)