IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12004 of 2008 Between: The Andhra Pradesh Govt. Pharmacist's Union rep. by its President G. Ramachandra Rao, S/o. G. Chatwaji Rao H.No.19-46, Bandimetta Street, Kurnool. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Medical, Health and Family Welfare Department Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Director of Health, Government of A.P., Koti, Hyderabad. 3 The Regional Director of Medical and Health Services, Kadapa. 4 The District Medical and Health Officer, Kurnool District, Kurnool. 5 The District Collector, Kurnool District, Kurnool. 6 The A.P. NGO Association, rep. by its President, 5-9-1112, Gunfoundry, Non Home, Hyderabad-500029. 7 The Public Health & Medical Employees Union, rep. by its President, D.No.3-5-1044, INTUC Bhavan, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the application of Cir. Memo No.26135/Ser.Welfare/2002-1 of GAD dated 19.06.2002 issued by the Government in the transfer counseling in Medical and Health Department, Kurnool District to be held w.e.f. 11.06.2008 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 3 & 4 to conduct transfer counseling in Medical and Health Department, Kurnool District without giving beneﬁt under the Cir. Memo No.26135/Ser.Welfare/2002-1 of GAD dated 19.06.2002 issued by the Government. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. M. RATNA REDDY Counsel for Respondents: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FAMI.WELFARE The Court made the following: Order: (Per Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Anil R. Dave) The learned Advocate for the petitioner has submitted that the petition has become infructuous. In the circumstances, the petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. ________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ. _____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. August 7, 2008 MRR