IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7377 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: January 18, 2011 Satbir Singh and others .. Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: None for the petitioners. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 3.8.2010 passed by the trial court allowing the application of the respondent under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. The plaintiffs and defendant No.3 claim themselves to be biswedar and are in possession of the shamlat land so as the applicant- respondent Than Singh is also claiming the same right in the suit land and contesting the rights of the plaintiffs, therefore, certainly he is necessary party. Mere fact that the application filed by the applicant- Than Singh in other suit No.913 was dismissed is no ground to debar him from contesting the instant suit. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. January 18, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge