ir Cp 2^6^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH W.P. N0. /^0?C"^ /2006 PETITIONERS -<' ..^^^ ^^'l'^tM---" ^^l.r1^-"" ^.o0- •p,ese^eu;^ &aW*--" / Agroha Grihnirman Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Through: Its President Shri Santosh Agrawal (the Society is presently under Suspension), Agrasen Nagar, Ring Road Chowk, Mahadev Ghat, Raipur (C.G.) Shri Santosh Agrawal, S/o - Late Shri R.D. Agrawal, Aged about - 42 years, R/o - 33 Doongaji Colony, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS A '^ RESPONDENTS ,-"^".TV.\ ,<»!'""" ••S & s.^' co^ ^ ^/»^u> A. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Cooperative Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, District - Raipur, (C.G.). 2. The Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Telibandha, Ring Road, Sethi Villa, Raipur, (C.G.). ,^ 3. Dy. Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Near ZUa Panchayat Office, G.E. R(»ad,Raipur, (C.G.). WR]^T PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OP INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS. ORDERS, DIRECTIONS OR LIKE ETC. The petitioners most respectfully state as under:- XI-HC-78 HINWt Sh*41<t» 3^'-<(l<l|cl'q, ®Tfl'M'l(D,RlCfltfy V^.'P.NO' ^ oS^/^O0^ ••;•••^200 311^51WV (•^tt^siq'sT) -it- sf^riiirR-ii* f3T^I Sftllqi 8RIIW flf^tT 3fI^T 7-il- ytui Uautam Btiaaun, Aclvoc^te ynn Anin Sao. uovt. Advocal); Uearcl on aclmission. Itns petition under Ai-ticle 2] agamst t&e orcler ot Aunexure P-X Kaipur w&ereby the petitioiier's soci^ ssection 5-'i(.2J ot tae C.U. Cooperatn-t ot powei' unaer Section 3j(lU) ot tlie Case ot ttie petltioner is ma| society wftereas petitioner.No. '2.was ai tiie petition is ttiat eicler brot&er ot ]: eanor ot a aaily newspaper puoiish^a agamst tHe worKma 01 the parf.' m p( the petitioner No< L, an enquiry wa| cnar.aes ancl a snow cause notice ot petitioners to submit reply bv 25"' said neriod, flie order h-nnusned was petitioner an oppo'ctawty to su&mit cl( of affidavit filed by him on 22"" Julv bias agamst the petitionei's is wnl large. l nave hearci ttie teamecl aocuments aimexea wim tlie petition. ] llie enquuy uncier Kection ^ agamst Uie petltioner is still pending petitioners ai'e yet to subimt reply tc| pfissecl Jujv <t)i<<Fci41-f tiitKiTft'te^t (.Ri+tfK ^siRpTsn^r tor ttie petflioner. k for fhe State. :&/227 ot the (Jonstitution ot India is clffectea &y Uy. Kegistrar, Cooperative Societies, |n- has'oeen superseaecl penclma enqun''.' unaer f: Societies Act, IVW m me puiyortea exercise f»-'.U. L'oopei'ative Kocietie.s Act, iy&U. ^ petitioner 'ND. l is a regis'tered cooperative the.Fresiclent ot tlie saicl socieT-y. ilie allegation betitioner No. 2 namely Uai Ki-is&an Agi'awal is fi'om RMpuf and he has probably pi'otested pwer anct theretore, just to tiarass Uie brother ot ? mitiatecl aaainst ttie socieh' at some tamtecl 1 .:umexure F-3 was issuecl callmg upon Uie '', 2006, however-even before the exoilT of the basscd on 24m Juiy, 2006 without affordin.e. the ptailecl reply to the cliaiaes, solely on tnie basis E'006. From the above facts. it is contencled that ccjunsel tor ine petitioner. l tiave perusea tlie 5(2) ot tlie C.'j. Cooperative Societies Act, on tlie caarges mentionecl m iix. 1-'-4. ibe Uie ettargea levellecl aaainst tiiem and m ffle XI-HC-78 *ii*i<'ii a»^frai 3?? SIFII?PT, ®Tfty'|i»,Rioi'My w.^ P .^^0 •^^.^.l^ ^, W5[ 200 3TI^?T ira^; (l{c|i^s|<{8T) Trl^iRi ^TT 3TI^?T 5»)liict) ^cn^iT ^rf^T 3TI^T meanwlule, ttie uy; Kegistrar exerci^: Coopei'ative Kocieties Act has pass-] petitioner socief/ aurmg ttie penclencj impugneci orcler is appellable uncler Ke^ ancl Uiie petitioners ftave not availecl wise, the socien' has. been supei'sed^ cooperative yocieties Act ana tae all^ nature. itius consitlermg uiat uie azittionn' wliile exercismg powei' untli|r is an appeUable order under Section petition is disiiussea as not mamtainaqi witeft^ tffRcifif fecfl'rf^rezre ^iari^TsnSsr jmg power unaer Kection 33(iu) ot tlie C.(j. ;cl the impugned order ancl supersedefi tUe t' ot Uie enqutn'. It is not m aispute Uiat tlie ;tion /7 ot tlie C.U. Cooperative Mocieties Act |the aitemative remedy ot appeal. Even omer |cl in exereise ot powei- conlen-ecl uncter tlie ['gations ol malaticle are general and vague m impusnecl orcler nas been passecl by a statutoiy statute ancl turtlier consiaermg tliat Uie oraer '/ 6t tbe C.U.-Cooperative Hocietiss Act, tliis jle. Sd/- Dhil-endra Mishra Judge P.T.O.