ns. WATTii, Dhruv Kumar Dubey (t>.K. Dubey) Son of Shri R.©. &ubey, aged obout 57 yeors, Sesident of Old Sarkanda Shivghat, Hlaspur, Tohsi! and bistrict Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus isponaentt State of Chhattisgar'h, Through The Secretery, Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhfflvon, Raipur (C.&5 The Chief Engineer, Public Works bepartment Bilospur Range, Bilaspur (C.i3.) • The Superintending Engineer Bilaspiir Circle Bilaspur (C.6.1 The Exeeutivs Engineer, PubSic Works bspartment Division No. l Bilaspur (C.e.) (Inquiry Officer) The Sub Oivisiona! Officer, Public Works Depwtment Sub bivision No. 1 Bilospur (C.6.) ingie Beneh; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sotish K. ^nihotri Present; Mr. Ashok Kumar Shukla Mr. Arvind Advocate for for the the petitioner ^ ;«» 1. The petitioner, white working in the office of ths Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Bilaspur, as ^ssistant ©rade-III,was placed under suspensi'on vide order- dated 24.11.2006 (^nnexure P-1) in view of pendency of Crimino! Ccse No. 36/97 for- offences punishable under Seetion 407,420,471,120-B of the Indian Penal Code. 2. The petitioner chaltenges the impugned order on the ground that the departmenta! emjuiry pendi'ng egainst him has not been conc'uded. On reading of the suspension order, it is etear thot the order has not been aassed in vfew of pendency of djsciplincry proceedings of Rule 9 of the Modhya Pradedi Civil Services (Classification, Contro! and Appeal) Rufas. 1966 (for brief "the Rules, 1966). The impugned order was passed under of the Rules, 1966. 3. This wtition has no merit in the case. Thus, petition is dismissed. No order ;ubhssh as to costs. Consequentfy, I.A, 01, upplication for stay/interim relief, stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge