IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 15TH JUNE 2009 / 25TH JYAISHTA 1931 RP.No. 208 of 2009(J) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.32645/2008 Dated 07/11/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): --------------------------------- KUMARAN, S/O.KUJAYYAN,AMBAZHATHIMYAL, AGED 58,PALLINAMKARA,THRIKKAKARA(N) VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM,REP. BY P/A HOLDER RAJEEV.A.K,AGED 38,AMBAZHATHIMYAL,PALLINAMKARA, THRIKKAKARA NORTH VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.P.M.ZIRAJ RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS -------------------------- 1. P.K. KHADERMON, PUTHUVEETIL KOOTTINGAL HILL GARDESN HOUSING COLONY, THRISSUR - 680 014. 2. N.A. IBRAHIMKUTTY, NAMBIPUNNATH HOUSE, MATHILAKOM.P.O, THRISSUR - 680 685. 3. M. BAVA MOOPPAN, MADAYAPURATH HOUSE, ALFALAJI, ALUVA. 4. SUBAIR.V.K, VALIYAKATH HOUSE, THIKKADU.P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 5. M. SALAHUDEEN, SHADES, S.S. ROAD, THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. 6. ABDURAHIMAN K.P, VEEROLI, NOORMAHAL, MAYYAZHI. 7. MUHAMMEDUNNI OLAKKARA, SKYLINE MEADOWS, ERAGHIPALAM, CALICUT - 673 010. R.P.(NO.) 208/2009 8. K.P. ABDUL HAMEED, KESAVATH PARAMBIL, VADAKKEKAD, KOCHANNUR, THRISSUR - 679 562. 9. DR.P.M.M. SYED, C.C 103, REVIERA ESTATE, THEVARA, COCHIN. 10. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 11. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 12. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THRIKKAKARA NORTH VILLAGE, PATHADIPALAM, KOCHI-33. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN BY ADV. P.K.SURESHKUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ----------------------------- R.P. No.208 of 2009-J in W.P(C) No. 32645 of 2008 ------------------------------ Dated this the 15th day of June, 2009. O R D E R None appears for the review petitioner. There was also no representation when the case was called on for hearing. The review petition seeks a review of the interim order passed by this Court on 7.11.2008 while admitting the writ petition. If the review petitioner is aggrieved by the interim order passed by this Court his remedy is to move for vacating the interim order. The review petitioner has already filed I.A.No.16184 of 2008 seeking impleadment as an additional respondent in the writ petition and I.A.No.16399 of 2008 to vacate the interim order. In these circumstances I am not inclined to entertain this review petition. The review petition fails and is accordingly dismissed, without prejudice to the review petitioner's right to prosecute I.A.No.16184 of 2008 and I.A.No.16399 of 2008. Sd/- P.N.RAVINDRAN JUDGE //True Copy// PA to Judge ab