THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1881 of 2011 Dated 02nd February, 2011 Between: K.Narsimha …Petitioner And The State of Andhra Pradesh, Civil Supplies Department, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri K.Narsi Reddy Counsel for respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.4 in not permitting the petitioner to run fair price shop No.2 of Velvarthy Village, Valigonda Mandal, Nalgonda District, as illegal and arbitrary. I have heard Sri K.Narsi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, and perused the record. The petitioner’s fair price shop dealership was cancelled by respondent No.4. Questioning the said cancellation order, the petitioner filed an appeal before respondent No.3. By order, dated 25.12.2010, respondent No.3 granted stay of the order of respondent No.4. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent Nos.4 and 5 have not been complying with the order of respondent No.3. In my opinion, if the order passed by respondent No.3 is not being implemented by his subordinates, the petitioner is entitled to approach respondent No.3 for appropriate directions. When an order was passed by the hierarchical authority in exercise of its quasi judicial functions, the subordinate authorities are bound to follow them. If there is defiance on the part of the subordinate authorities in following the order of the superior authority, the aggrieved party can always approach the superior authority by way of a representation. The jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot be invoked for execution of the orders passed by the quasi judicial authorities. This Court has no doubt that if the petitioner makes a representation before respondent No.3, he will issue appropriate directions to respondent Nos.4 and 5 for due implementation of his order. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.2307 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 02nd February, 2011 VGB