WPMS No.2555 of 2011 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Heard Shri Birendra Singh Adhikari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Plaintiff/respondent instituted Suit No.83 of 2011 for permanent injunction against the petitioner in respect of property in question. On 20.09.2011, the Suit was registered and summon was issued fixing 30.09.2011. The learned trial Court also considered 6C2 application of the plaintiff/respondent and granted ex-parte injunction. On 30.09.2011, petitioner filed objection alongwith an application (36C2) for grant of interim injunction in his favour. He also filed written statement and counter claim. The case was again listed on 13.10.2011, 20.10.2011, 24.10.2011 and 23.11.2011, but application filed by the petitioner for vacating the interim injunction has not been decided so far. Now, 14.12.2011 is fixed in the matter. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in the year 1994, petitioner purchased the property in question by way of registered sale deed and infact, he is true owner of the said land, but due to ex-parte interim injunction, the respondent is encroaching upon the land in question and harassing the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner confined his prayer and prayed that writ petition may be disposed with a direction to the learned trial Court to decide the temporary injunction application of the plaintiff/respondent (6C2) as well as application of the petitioner (36C2) at the earliest. Prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, appears to be genuine, therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.), Rishikesh, District Dehradun to decide the 6C2 and 36 C2 applications in the Original Suit No.83 of 2011 “Simla Devi Vs. Suresh and others” either on 14.12.2011 or within a period of fifteen days’ thereafter. Interim Relief Application (CLMA No.12735 of 2011) also stands disposed of. (V.K. Bist, J.) Arpan 05.12.2011