THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO C.R.P.Nos.4115 &5990 of 2009 and C.C.No.1465 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: All these three matters are clubbed together and heard, as issues involved are common amongst the parties. C.R.P.No.5990 of 2009 has been preferred by the defendants in O.S.No.24 of 2007 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Adilabad. It is directed against the orders, dated 14.09.2009, passed in C.M.A.No.2 of 2009, on the file of the Family Court-cum-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Adilabad, which in turn was preferred against the orders passed in I.A.No.82 of 2008 in O.S.No.24 of 2007. C.R.P.No.4115 of 2009 has been preferred by the plaintiffs in O.S.No.13 of 2008 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Boath, Adilabad District, who are the purchasers of the land from the petitioners in C.R.P.No.5990 of 2009. The plaintiff, namely Sri Mohammed Rasool, in O.S.No.24 of 2007 is the sole defendant in O.S.No.13 of 2008. The entire issue centers around the land of an extent of Ac.8.33 guntas situated in Survey No.20/AA of Kanigiri Village, Yechoda Mandal, Adilabad Distirct. In view of the order that I have proposed to pass, I consider it unnecessary to deal with elaborately various contentions that have been canvassed at the Bar by the learned counsel appearing for the parties. The plaintiff and the defendants in O.S.No.24 of 2007 are claiming equal rights in the said land, whereas the two plaintiffs in O.S.No.13 of 2008 are the purchasers from defendants in O.S,No.24 of 2007. Since the issues of common interest do arise and it will be convenient for all parties to have both the suits tried together, a memo has been filed seeking transfer of O.S.No.13 of 2008 from the Court of Junior Civil Judge at Boath to the Court of Junior Civil Judge at Adilabad. I, therefore, direct that O.S.No.13 of 2008 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Boath be transferred to be tried along with O.S.No.24 of 2007 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Adilabad. The respective parties will maintain status quo existing as of now with regard to the possession of the land of Ac.8.33 guntas. The contempt case initiated in C.C.No.1465 of 2009 by the plaintiff in O.S.No.24 of 2007 is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to agitate the cause raised therein, relating to violation of the injunction order granted by the civil Court, before the civil Court. In view of this, the notice issued in C.C.No.1465 of 2009 stands discharged and the said C.C. is dismissed. C.R.P.Nos.4115 and 5990 of 2009 shall stand disposed of in terms of the order passed. It is needless to observe that the civil Court shall deal with the suits as expeditiously as possible and decide the same, preferably within a period of six (6) months from today. No costs. ___________________________ (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) Date: 09.04.2010 JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO C.R.P.Nos.4115 &5990 of 2009 and C.C.No.1465 of 2009 Date: 09.04.2010