1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :: J U D G M E N T :: S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.7618/2007 [PRATAP SINGH SOLANKI VS.THE STATE OF RAJ..] Date of Judgment : 08.04.2008. HON'BLE MR. MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, J. Mr.L.D.Khatri for the petitioner. Mr. Alkesh Agarwal AGA for the State. ***** This writ petition has come up for early hearing of the petition. However, at the request of the learned counsel for the parties the matter is heard and decided finally. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer that respondents be directed to construct pucca khala outlet {Moga} for supply of water in Chak No.10 and 11 SBS in Mohangarh Distt., Jaisalmer. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in the earlier Writ Petition No. 6954/2006 filed by Bhartiya Kisan Sangh, Jaisalmer this Court had already issued a direction to the effect that the respondent Irrigation Department should provide irrigation facilities to the cultivators within a reasonable period and if the Government 2 decide to construct pucca khala then the same may be constructed at the earliest and decision in that regard be communicated to the petitioner within a period of three months. This Court in present writ petition passed an order on 28.03.2008 to call upon the respondents as to why the order referred above, passed by this Court in the Writ Petition No.6954/2006 has not been complied with. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that necessary process has already been undertaken by the respondents for construction of pucca khala but actual work has not been performed by making pucca khala operational. Learned counsel for the respondent states at Bar that Government has already taken decision to construct pucca khala for supply of water for irrigation and in that regard even process has already undertaken to a great extent. It was prayed by the learned counsel for the respondents that this Court may grant further time of a period of two months for completion of the work as the entire work would be completed within the aforesaid period. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the respondents nothing more survives as the counsel for the petitioner submits that though respondents are praying for two months time but they may be given four months but then in that period the work should be ordered to be completed. Looking to the facts and circumstances of 3 the case, the respondents are given four months time to complete the work as prayed in the writ petition. Since a decision has already been taken to construct the pucca khala the entire work should be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order to the respondents. With the aforesaid directions the petition stands disposed of. (MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI), J. mamta