bsb IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 9014 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 9014 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 9014 OF 2007 Miss Sunita Narayan More ... Petitioner V/s The Comptroller of Examination of S.N.D.T. University & ors. ... Respondents Mr. R.S.Ghadge for the petitioner. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND J.N.PATEL AND J.N.PATEL AND SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. MHATRE, JJ. MHATRE, JJ. DATED: DATED: DATED: 16TH JANUARY, 2008. 16TH JANUARY, 2008. 16TH JANUARY, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. The petitioner has approached this Court invoking its extraordinary jurisdiction seeking a declaration that the marks given to the petitioner by the examiner in Subject Code No.A-2 i.e. Psychology of Teaching and Learning are illegal and improper and that the University should be directed to send the answer-sheet for re-checking to a qualified teacher and declare the marks for the said subject accordingly. 2. In this case, the petitioner has already approached the respondents for re-valuation which is duly done. It has not affected the valuation of the paper in question. In support of the petition, the petitioner has also 2 placed on record the assessment of the answer paper done by some professor which cannot be accepted by this Court as a substitute to the examiner appointed by the University. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to show us any rules governing the conduct of examination by the University which permits such exercise to be undertaken. 4. Therefore, there is no merit in the petition and the petition stands dismissed. (J.N. (J.N. (J.N. PATEL, J.) PATEL, J.) PATEL, J.) (SMT.NISHITA (SMT.NISHITA (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) MHATRE, J.) MHATRE, J.)