IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CR.APPLN/537/2011 KAMLAKAR PUNA PHALAK AND ORS V/S DR. SURESH PANDIT BOROLE AND ORS ... Shri Swapnil Patil, Advocate for the applicants, Shri V.D.Hon, Advocate for respondent No.1 and Shri D.V.Tele, APP for Respondent / State ... AND CR.APPLN/741/2011 EKNATH CHINDHA PATIL AND ORS V/s DR.SURESH PANDIT BOROLE AND ORS ... Shri R.R.Mantri, Advocate for the applicants, Shri V.D.Hon, Advocate for respondent No.1 and Shri D.V.Tele, APP for Respondent / State ... CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & A.V.POTDAR,JJ. Dated : February 24, 2011 PER COURT :- 1. By both these applications, the applicants seek to intervene in the petition. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 3. For the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the applicants are permitted to intervene in the writ petition. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) (P.V.HARDAS, J.) ... akl