S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7215/2008 Prahalad Garg Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 22.9.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, for the petitioner. ... As per the petitioner he submitted an application in the office of the District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Udaipur to be considered for the purpose of appointment as Prabodhak, however, he was not called for to face the process of selection. On 27.8.2008 he submitted a representation to the District Education Officer but of no consequence. As a matter of fact no definite reason is available for not calling the petitioner to face the proceedings. Issue notice to show cause as to why this petition for writ be not admitted. Shri N.M. Lodha, learned Additional Advocate General accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner submitted an application for the purpose of consideration for appointment as Prabodhak, but the respondents without assigning any reason, rejected his candidature by not calling him to face the interview. On asking, it is also stated that no reasons in writing are prescribed by the respondents. :: 2 :: It is the position admitted that, before approaching this Court the petitioner has not made any effort to get his grievance redressed by the respondents themselves, thus, I consider it appropriate to direct the petitioner to submit a representation to the District Education Officer concerned for redressal of his grievances. If the petitioner submits such representation within a period of one week from today, the District Education Officer shall consider and decide the same by speaking and reasoned order within a period of three weeks thereafter. Petition for writ is disposed of accordingly. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal '