[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.1673 OF 2007 Balkrishna Dagdu Bhapkar ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.R.S.Kate advocate for applicant Mr.S.S.Pednekar A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JUNE 12, 2007 DATE : JUNE 12, 2007 DATE : JUNE 12, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.57 of 2007 of Baramati City Police Station. The said case is mainly under Sections 420 and 468 of IPC. 3. Mr.Kate, the learned advocate for the applicant states that after the application for anticipatory bail preferred by the applicant came to be rejected, the co-accused Mr.Kantilal Tavade [-2-] preferred an application for anticipatory bail before the concerned Sessions Court and the said application came to be granted. Mr.Kate has further submitted that the case of the present applicant and the co-accused is similar. 4. In this view of the matter, I am of the opinion that the applicant ought to be granted one opportunity to prefer a fresh application for anticipatory bail before the concerned Sessions Court. To enable the applicant to prefer necessary application before the concerned Sessions Court, the interim protection granted to the applicant is extended by a period of two weeks from today. 5. Application is disposed of. [Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.]