1 IN THE HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE^O. 2^ti3 2011 (Arising out of order dated 30-08-2010 passed by this Honlble Court, inW.P.(C) No. 4733/2010) PETITIONER{S) : 1. ^•^ ^v^y> >^^>':c' ^•'" &^' ^'",^y ^y. ^ \v j&M8S^ [^ ^ <w%^'& m} • L5^ &T»^ Sudhakar ^&J^key (Suddhu), S/o. Late Jhadu Ukey, aged about 69 years, Miss Leena Ukey, D/o. Shri Sudhakai' Rao Ukey, aged about 32 years, Miss Asha Ukey, D/o. Shri Sudhakar Rao Ukey, aged about 28 years, 4. Prashant Ukey, S/o. Shri Sudhakar Rao Ukey, aged about 30 years, All Residence of Quarter No. 281, Janta Colony Tilak Nagar, Gudyari, Distt. Rajpur (C.G.) VERSUS L. K. Mishra, Chairman, High Level Caste Scrutiny Committee, Scheduled Caste Research & Training Institute,, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Campus, Raipur (C.G.) CONTEMFT PETITION UNDER ARTICLJE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMFT OF COURT ACT 1971 RESPONDENTS CONTEMNOR <*tl^^E^ Rt<i Wl %^t StkNicH ^ Deepti iiNCTi <^«<(cn "T^T ^E^w^ ^^lwi^, i®i<rtW^< . ^j-. ^o^ CQ ^•^<?/u m ••^20Q ^il^l^^K (<i€<tyi<^) 1^N^'eJ^%^( SB : Hon'ble Shri iVSanindra Mohlin Shrivastava. J. Q3-Q8°2Q11 Shri Vinod Deshmukh, cour^ei Learned counsei for the passed an order on 30/08/10 in VV| been completed by the Commitre^ information / documents / testimo< reievant documents. He further the petitioners submitted requirec| matter has remained pending witht From the documents whicrf enquiry in the case of the petitionef had issued memo dated 13/12/2l submitted documents again on 4/4|; Therefore, i am not inciinedl no specific time iimit has been be observed that the ordersof thej reasonabie time. As the case ol Committee, the same shouid be 4 with the directions issued by this C| in case, no finai decision is| iiberty to revive the contempt petiti<t The petition is finaily dispos^d fix^d <so(^t<rt<lln "RTR^f^ 'fe^zt <Pnt$l< ^TSitR^^I^T forthepetitioners. p^titioners alieges that even though this Court |P.(C) No.4733/10, the caste verification has not He submits that time and again, as and when (liais were demanded, the petitioners submitted si|bmits that pursuantto memo dated 13/12/2010, documents lastiy on 4/4/2011. However, the |ut any decision tiii date. have been piaced on record, it is found that js is going on and the Caste Scrutiny Committee p10 to the petitioner and the petitioners have |2011. jto issue notice to respondents particuiariy when for declsion of their case. However, it has to jCourt are required to be compiied with within a |? the petitioners remasned pending before the lecided within a reasonabie time in accordance burton 30/08/2010. jtaken in the matter, tha petitloners would be at |n, after three months. off. Sd/- MamndraM^Sbri<as.ava Judge ^m^^^*Ss^l^,, ^^jt^N—FS^l40—2/^Oi t—i ;so,(ma. z