IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1159 of 2006 SEIKH ABDUL MANNAN Versus BIBI TAHERA KHATOON & ANR ----------- 4 8.12.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. For the reasons mentioned in the application being I.A. No. 6855/2008, the substitution of the sole petitioner is allowed who is directed to be substituted by his heirs and legal representatives named in paragraph no.2 of the said I.A. No. 6855/2008. Office to make necessary correction in the cause title. The grievance of the petitioner as with regard to the impugned order impleading the interveners as party to the suit seems to be based on some unfounded apprehensions. It is not in doubt that the petitioner has filed title suit as with regard to certain piece of land of khata no. 86, khesra no. 75, area 10 dhur in district West Champaran. While before institution of the suit in the year 2004, it appears that the same land was already made subject matter of two sale deeds dated 5.5.2002 and 12.8.2002 in favour of the interveners and accordingly, the interveners having come to know of the suit in hand had filed an application seeking intervention under Order I Rule 10(2) of the C.P.C. The Court below having gone into the original documents, 2 the two sale deeds referred above, has found that the suit land being subject matter of two registered sale deeds, the addition of interveners as defendants to the suit was necessary as it would enable the Court to decide the suit effectively. The submission of the counsel for the petitioner that by impleading the interveners unnecessary complication will be created because the suit of the petitioner was basically confined against only Bibi Tahera Khatoon, the opposite party no.1 is to be noted for its being rejected inasmuch as the Court below has gone into this aspect of the matter and has found the interveners to be necessary party. Obviously, there is no jurisdictional error in taking such a view by the Court below in the impugned order. That being so, this civil revision application is misconceived and accordingly, the same is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)