IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA LPA No.29 of 2008 Decided on : May 5, 2010 High Court of Himachal Pradesh …Appellant. Versus M.D. Kaushal …Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Appellant : Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate. Surjit Singh, J (Oral) Heard. 2. It is stated by the learned counsel representing both the parties that one other LPA, titled as High Court of H.P. versus Padam Chand Sharma (LPA No.30 of 2008), involving similar questions of facts and law, has been disposed of vide judgment dated 5th March, 2009, by a Division Bench of this Court and that no appeal having been carried to the Supreme Court against the said judgment, the same has attained finality. Parties say that the present matter may be disposed of on the lines of the earlier appeal. Consequently, the present LPA is dismissed and the judgment of the learned Single Judge is upheld. Copy of judgment in LPA No.30 of 2008 has been made available to Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? …2… us, which is ordered to be taken on record and that shall form part of this order. In view of the disposal of the main appeal, pending applications also stand disposed of, as having become infructuous. ( Surjit Singh ), J May 5, 2010(sd) ( V.K. Sharma ), J