HIGH COVRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WMT PETITION No. 2320 of2001 KU SHWETA 8HRIVA8TAVA aged about 25 years: d/o Shri R-D.Shrivastava: r/o Vidya Nagar: Bilaspur. VERSUS : 1. State of Clihattisgaifa Throu^i: The Secretary to Ifae Govenunent of Chhattisgarii, School Education Department Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Direetor, State Couneil of Educational ReseMish & Training, Shankar Nagar: Kaipur 3. The Princip&l, Oovt. College of Education, Bilaspur-(C.G.) 4. The Principal, Saint Vincent Pallotie College, Raipur(C.G.) WEIT PETTHON UNDER ARTtCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUnON OF ENDIA. SB: Hon'ble Shfi Sattsh K. ABrihotri. J. Present: Shri Manindra Shrivastava, Senior Advocate wilfa Shri Anurag Dayal Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for Ihe State/respondente 1,2 and 3. Shri B.D.Gum, Advoeate for respondent No. 4. ORALORDiER CPassedon 17al day of November, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitiona- subnuts Ifaat the prayer soug^it for in this petition has already been satisfied as the petitioner was pemiitted to appear in the course and thereafter, tiie petitioner has passed out B.Ed tauning course, and the result has als6 been declared. The petitioner was admitted on the strength of order dated 06.12.2001, provisioaally. The petitioaer had completed her B.Ed course and the result Ifaereofhas been declared. The petitioner has been held as 'Pass'. Thus, at fhis stage, no piupose would be served ifthe case is considered on merit Setting aside the B.Ed examination certificrte, wfaich the petitioner has obtained, would be eounter-productive. Thwefare, Ifae admissioa yanted to the petitioner provisionally, be treated as proper admission to ttie coiuse and consequential effects be givento the result ofthe B.Ed examiaation eourse. 3. In view offoregoing, the petitioa stands disposed of. No order as to eosts. 4. Consequently, M(W)P No. 257^001, applicationfor interim ordw, abo staads disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judgc ^Km.