IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 18TH AUGUST 2011 / 27TH SRAVANA 1933 RP.No. 581 of 2011(N) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.28376/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/WRIT PETITIONER ------------------------------------- K.SREELATHA, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (HINDI), C.M.S.HIGH SCHOOL, ARRAPETTA, MEPPADI P.O., WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHOMBALA, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 308. BY G.P.SMT. RANI DIATHIMA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: RP.No. 581 of 2011(N) REVIEW PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A1 COPY OF G.O(ms)NO.69/10.G.EDN DATED 28.4.2010. ANNEXURE AII COPY OF LETTER DATED 7.6.2011 OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER WAYANAD TO THE PETITIONER. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. cl T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------- Review Petition No.581 OF 2011 in W.P.(C). No.28376 OF 2009 --------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2011 ORDER This Review Petition is filed by the petitioner pointing out that even though the judgment was rendered, by Annexure A-II a communication was issued to the petitioner by the District Educational Officer asking him to produce the order granting leave for the period from 27.1.2005 to 17.11.2005. It is pointed out that the same applies for the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.26557/08 which was disposed of along with the present Writ Petition. It is pointed out that the explanation thereafter offered by the petitioner has not been accepted. It is also pointed out that Exhibit P3 order has not been specifically quashed in the judgment, which also requires a reconsideration. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader also. The reasons stated by the petitioner are genuine and therefore the Review Petition is allowed. The judgment in W.P. (C)No.28376/09 is recalled. Post the Writ Petition on 20.8.2011. Sd/-(T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn