C—78 311^1 VI !<-li+ "?T<ff 3TI^T ?FlfW \ 'S^ '<iWW''i, Wxl\WI<a, fqclKiy WHW <h1|eb """""""""""""""""""" """"W^ 200 3ll^?T '(IX?r (yif^tt^) TOIIW ^Tftn siii;?i HXGH COURT OF- CHIHATTiSGARH AT BILASFUR WRIT PETI' FETTTIONER ChaiidriJta Prasad Kesharwani, aged 58 years, Ifi.tS' Slu*1 A/Tt 7"TJtT.'^m Kestl.\VSJ7WSTLi oi sneormarayan, tensu piaw^ai'ii, faajgir-Chanipa (CG) "ar^r* nf resiaent d'istTict-- VetsVS RESPOnDEHTS 1. The Conlaussioner, SetUement, Gaadhi Cnowk Raipur { 2. Additioay Chowk; 3. TIie SU Hettiement Uimmissioner, uandtu f.aipu.r (CG) ^te of Chjiattisgarh, through the Secretar+. Denaj-tiaent of Reveaue. Rainur fCG) WS1T£MI.TLQN_UNDER_ARTICL|E226 uF THE_CQNSTrTuT'LOn _OF 1N_DIA n'esent: Mr. somnatn Verms Mr. Susliil Dubev.? BB: HOn'BLE SHRI DHlKJBWDRA MISHRA^J IJie gnevance ot Uie peu^ HetUeinent UHicer, Kaipur atlow^d ot Annexure r-'^s, aated l.l) prefen'ed aa appeal against f4< oiaer ol Anuexui-e l-'-'d, clatedl penamg belore tne aaailion^il responclents nave not caretl ^xpetlitious neanag ot tne prof' <01<(t<'1*fll '(WClI^f ftTA <F'1*<;1< ??3iRn<Hi^!f IpNlO^o. 6fiO/OR ;G) |i, counsel tor tne peuuoner. (Eovt. Advocate for the State. ORfllL O R D E R 06-S-2-W8 \ioner in fhe instaat petition is fhat fhe the appeal offhe petitioner vide order 1.2000. The respondent-Badriprasad above order aiid obtaiaed stay vide 4.^.^UUU. Kuice Uien, tbe appeal is 1 Settiement CoTnmissiouer and the to maKe suitable arrangeiaents lor ;eedmgs before fhe Court pf Additional ^:^-^.s •^^^^^^'iS^^^ -HC—78 <»•°<"i<l<ll<'l4l, ®fl1y'i<o,fqcii'yy *imw g,»<ic(,--—•••-•••- •••—--•-••••-^^200 sii^r'q^r (ipfgq^q) sn^iv Wi* wnsn^rwRTO s TOIIW ^iter an^d 2^. Hemement (Jommissioner aacl to ftie State tias been prayed lor, Mr. Uubey, leamecl Uoi subuuts tnat me State nas fjouimissioner, Laad Kecord, vifl ^UUS, and ui view ot tlie aDove t&e Atlditional Settlement Conui and ttie grievance ot ttie petitioni in view 01 t&e above of wim a directioii to ttie conci Ifo. 11/f^T./1999-2000 'Bad3\ frasacl tiesnwctfwani' expediUc] inonUis trom tae date ot receipt^ (JeiUtiect copy as per niles| uli these circiunstance suitable du-ection ^fc ^>liifcl<ilt "HW?i¥^f 1^^ ^R^K ^afRiqaiT^r v{t. Advocale appeai-mg tor ttie Ktate ay'eady appointed one senior officer as |e order olAnnexure R-l, dated 1st May ^pouitinent, the niattei's pendiug before ;omi4issioner, shall be taken up for hearing tr staacls reclressed. suDnlussion, ttie uistaat penuon is disposed pmect auUoniy to dispose ot t&e case ivrasad Keshwarwani Vs. Cnadrika |usly pi-eferabty within a period of Uiree Iproduction ofcopy ofthis order.^---^' SAI;^^ca ^y' ^^ ??^^ ':^^^;::;,.£^?^s^:<^'S':;^^i^%(:t^^^SS •g^^^^SsSaS •j^ssS^S ;i^^