IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-30114 of 2008 Date of Decision: November 18, 2008 Makhan Singh … Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND Present : Ms. B.P.K. Brar, , Advocate, for the petitioner. *** S.D. Anand, J. Crl. Misc. No.52877 of 2008 Allowed, as prayed for. Crl. Misc. No. M-30114 of 2008 The petitioner – prisoner is on parole and he is to surrender today. The learned counsel for the petitioner-prisoner argues in favour of the grant of extension of parole period because petitioner-prisoner is required to be by the side of his wife who has undergone an operation for renal stone. Notice of motion. Crl. Misc. No. M-30114 of 2008 On the asking of the Court, Ms. Manjari Nehru, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, it is ordered that the parole period of the petitioner-prisoner shall stand extended by a fortnight. It will be for the learned State counsel to communicate the order to the Competent Authority. Copy of this order be given to the learned counsel for the parties under the signatures of the Court Secretary. November 18, 2008 ( S.D. Anand ) vinod Judge 2