IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1695 of 2010 RAJIV RANJAN LAL @ RAJIV RANJAN SAHAI S/O DOMAN LAL R/O VILL.- KHARGANWAN, P.O. AMAON, P.S. CHAINPUR, DISTT.- KAIMUR (BHABHUA) Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION ROHTAS CUM KAIMUR, ROHTAS AT SASARAM, DISTT.- ROHTAS 4. THE CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, CHAINPUR, DISTT.- KAIMUR, BHABHUA 5. LALBARTI SINGH S/O LATE BIKRAMA SINGH R/O VILL.- AMAON, P.S. CHAINPUR, DISTT.- KAIMUR (BHABHUA) 6. RAMRATI KUER W/O LATE BIKRAMA SINGH R/O VILL.- AMAON, P.S. CHAINPUR, DISTT.- KAIMUR (BHABHUA) 7. SMT. GIRIJA DEVI W/O LALBARTI SINGH R/O VILL.- AMAON, P.S. CHAINPUR, DISTT.- KAIMUR (BHABHUA) 8. ARUN KUMAR LAL S/O KRISHNA KANT LAL R/O VILL.- KHARGANWAN, P.O. AMAON, P.S. CHAINPUR, DISTT.- KAIMUR ----------- 03. 02.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 5.5.2009 passed by the Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna in Consolidation Revision Case No.297 of 1995, Annexure-1 as according to him without service of notice of the revision case the said order was passed to his detriment. To establish the aforesaid contention learned counsel for the petitioner has not annexed the complete order sheet of the revision case but considering the submission that petitioner is ready to deposit a cost of Rs.2500/- in the court of Director, Consolidation, I am of the view that if the amount of Rs.2500/- is deposited in the court of Director within four weeks from today then the Director shall recall the order dated 5.5.2009, Annexure-1 and issue notice to Lalbarti Singh and others, respondents second set and after their appearance shall reconsider the matter on the merits of the case and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. 3. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.) - 2 -