IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50569 of 2007 BHAGWATIYA DEVI & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 02.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are accused in a case registered for the offences under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the informant has lodged the present case without verifying the correct facts, however later on, on ascertaining the correct facts he has filed an application stating to the effect that the daughter of the informant was not killed by the petitioners, however she died in course of treatment. It is further submitted that the daughter of the informant had delivered a dead child and thereafter she died nearly within a month, which would be evident on perusal of the prescriptions contained in Annexure- 2 & 3. Learned Addl. P.P., on the other hand, on perusal of the case diary, has submitted that during investigation witnesses have stated to the effect that the daughter of the informant died on account of excess bleeding. - 2 - Having considered the submissions, as noticed above, and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioners, namely, Bhagwatiya Devi, Din Dayal Yadav & Upendra Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Imamganj P.S.Case No. 32 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)