IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH JULY 2008 / 8TH SRAVANA 1930 Ins.APP.No. 81 of 2005() ------------------------ IC.9/2002 of WORKMEN COMPENSATION COURT, ALAPPUZHA .................... APPELLANTS/OPP.PARTIES: ----------------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, E.S.I. CORPORATION, PANCHADEEP BHAVAN,THRISSUR-20. 2. THE RECOVERY OFFICER, REGIONAL OFFICE, E.S.I. CORPORATION, THRISSUR-20. BY ADV. SMT.T.D.RAJALAKSHMY, SC, ESI CORPN. RESPONDENTS: APPLICANTS: ----------------------------------- 1. PARAVOOR INDUSTRIAL CO-OP. POWER LOOMS LIMITED NO.P.IND (E) 129, KUTHIMACKAL ROAD, KUTHIKATUKARA POST, KALAMARASSERY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SMT.K.V. SUGANDHI. 2. M.J. ANTONY, CHAIRMAN, PARAVOOR INDUSTRIAL CO-OP. POWER LOOMS LIMITED NO.P.IND (E) 129, MUKKANICKAL HOUSE, NANTHIATTUKUNNAM, N. PARAVOOR. BY ADV. SRI.A.V.XAVIER FOR R1 & R2 SMT.THUSHARA JAMES FOR R1 & R2 THIS INSURANCE APPEALS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = INS.APPEAL NO. 81 OF 2005 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 30th day of June, 2008. J U D G M E N T This appeal is preferred against the judgment of the Employees Insurance Court, Alappuzha in I.C.9/02. The point that requires consideration is only regarding a correction to be made. The E.S.I Court in paragraph 8 of the judgment made it clear that “The opposite party was well justified in demanding contribution in respect of payments received by the trainers who are imparting the training.” The Court also made it very clear that it cannot be done from the trainees, but in the operative portion in paragraph 9 it is recorded, “I will make it clear that in no case the stipend received by the trainers shall be treated as wages etc. etc.” It is only a mistake and it is to be read as the word trainers has to be read as trainees and when it is done there is no other mistake in the appeal. So in the last paragraph of the Ins. Appeal. 81 OF 2005 -:2:- judgment in the last sentence the word 'trainers' is substituted by the word 'trainees'. The Ins. Appeal is disposed of accordingly. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-