IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-16514 of 2009 Date of Decision:- 20.07.2009 Jagjit Singh and another ....Petitioner(s) vs. State of Punjab ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH *** Present:- Mr.S.S.Chatrath and Mr.D.P.S.Randhawa, Advocates, for the petitioners. Mr.Amandeep Singh Rai, AAG, Punjab. *** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioners submits that, as per the order dated 12.6.2009 granting interim anticipatory bail to petitioner No.2, she had appeared before the Investigating Agency; however, on 10.7.2009, the investigating Agency submitted that petitioner No.2 is not cooperating with the investigation as she had not given her specimen signatures which were required to verify the factual aspect with regard to the genuineness of the agreement. He submits that now the specimen signatures have been given by petitioner No.2 to the investigating Agency. Counsel for the State does not dispute this factual aspect. However, he submits that there are serious allegations against the petitioners and, therefore, the concession of bail should not be granted to them. Keeping in view the fact that primarily the dispute revolves around an agreement and petitioner No.2 having given her specimen Crl.Misc.No.M-16514 of 2009 -2- signatures and further having joined the investigation, no further recoveries are to be effected from her on that count and is a lady. Order dated 12.6.2009 qua petitioner No.2 is made absolute. Petition stands disposed of. Petition qua petitioner No.1 stands dismissed as there are serious allegations against him. July 20, 2009 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) poonam JUDGE