IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-34189 of 2009 Date of decision : 3.12.2009 Poonam Sharma ....Petitioner through Mr.Sarfraj Hussain,Advocate Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents through none CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... MAHESH GROVER, J.(Oral) This is a prayer for cancellation of bail granted to respondents No.2 to 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the concession of bail granted to respondents No.2 to 7 deserves to be cancelled as the learned court of Addl. Sessions Judge while passing the impugned orders Annexures P-1 to P-3 had not taken into consideration that the dowry articles were not returned. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered opinion that the present petition is totally misconceived and deserves to be dismissed outrightly. The learned trial court had noticed certain facts which had weighed with it while granting the concession of bail to the aforesaid respondents. It had noticed that the father-in-law of the petitioner was 71 years of age and the marriage had lasted 17 years before the complainant (petitioner) Crl.Misc.No.M-34189 of 2009 -2- chose to raise this dispute. The orders of the learned trial court are well reasoned. It is the settled principle of law that the cancellation of bail is to be treated on a different pedestal than the considerations for grant of bail. There is no material on record to show that respondents No.2 to 7 have either abused the concession of bail or there has been misrepresentation of facts before the learned lower court while making a prayer for bail. In such an eventuality the bail already granted to respondents No.2 to 7 cannot be cancelled. Dismissed. 3.12.2009 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss