s mwra m‘a GE (2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR €€ \Lw K md-‘ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2§6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WRIT PETITION {3) No.Z3 /2oos PETITIONEP / Jagdish Prasad Mahilange S/o Shri Sant Ram Mahilange Age about 43 years, AssistantTeacher, Govt. Girls Primary. School, Kanki, Block - Kartala, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) VE RSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State Government ofChhattisgarh I /r;r:§:g» 1W. C’g‘g g? gr Vix‘wi {3 ?(; G‘g‘x‘v ‘ Through :— Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department & Edueatron £§g§ ‘° , 2. Department, D.K.S. Bvhawan, Ralpur (C.G.) District Education orticer Korba (C.G.) K 3. BIOck Education Officer K Kartala, Distt.- Korba (C.G.) Joint Director (Treasury/Accounts), XI—HC—78 mmm W W WO ge73/oe 11mm ..... . .. ...... W 20% mm (W) _,311%3Ta?rfé=[f$ ‘\ \wmm WW§WI§W§H mmmm %at%wam%m 06.12.2005 Shri Ajay Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Aahuja, learned G.A. forthe Statekespondent. By this petition under M-icles 2261227 of the Constitution of India, the petjiéioner seeks a directior to the respondents to pay the increments and seniority on the basis of tt e date of his initial appointment in the iight of the decision rendered by :he learned State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in Original Applicati No. 2745/1989 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of MP. and ot ers) dated 24.8.1992 2. Learned counsel appea ing for the petitioner placed reliance on the order dated 9‘“ October 2006 assed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No. 547312006 (Rakesh Kumar Sh rma and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and in Writ Petiti n (S) No. 5474/2006 (Jai Nath Bajpai Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ohers) and submits that the petitioner is similarly situated, therefore, th similar order may be passed. 3. ‘ The case of the petitio er is that he was appointed as Assistant Teacher in the School Educati n Department on probation for a period of two years with the fixed salary However, later on, after completion of two years’ probation, the petitioner was regularized but, he was not given the regular pay scale. Other si ilarly situated teachers moved the State Administrative Tribunal, Jabal ur for regular pay-scale, wherein learned Tribunal vide order dated 24.8.1992 allowed the same. The petitioner made several representations o accord the same treatment as he is also P.T.O. o‘ 3; XI—HC—78 WWWW . w Kwo €é 73/06 mm..oooooo .0 o..... ax AQU WW(W) wmWm wmm WW§F§QT1W mmwméw aamm similarly situated, but, the respondents have not paid any heed. Thus, this petition. 4. Learned counsel for tl'e petitioner submits that the petitioner may be aliowed to make a representation to respondent No.1 to give simiiar treatment to the petitioner an same pay-scaie which has been sanctioned to other similarly situated te chers on account of the order of the State Administrative Tribunai dated 24.8.1992, to which learned counsel for the respondent/Statehas no obje tion. 5. Having heard learned ounsel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances f the case, in the opinion of this Court, the limited prayer made by Iear ed counsel for the petitioner appears to be reasonable. Therefore, the p titioner is allowed to make a representation within a period of two weeks rom today to respondent No.1, raising all his grievances and, in turn, respondent No.1 shall decide the said representation in an objectiv manner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of such rep esentation, atter considering all the points raised by the petitioner andt king into account the order dated 24.8.1992 passed by the learned State dministrative Tribunal in Original Application No. 2745/1989. 6. The writ petition is ccordingly disposed of with the aforesaid direction. No order as to cost . v Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge 7'. Certified copy as per r les. FIG.