THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.M.A.No:2302 of 2001 ORDER: The respondent filed T.A.No.109 of 1990 against the appellants herein claiming a sum of Rs.68,498/- towards the cost of shortage of rice of 575 bags, entrusted to the appellants for transport. The Railway Claims Tribunal, Secunderabad, allowed the T.A. through its order dated 26.11.1998. Thereafter, the appellants filed review petition i.e., D.D.R.No.259 of 1999, and the same was dismissed on 2.01.1999. Hence the C.M.A under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987. Heard Sri C. Venkatamalla Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Railways and Sri Meharchand Noori, learned counsel for the respondent. It is not in dispute that the appellants on the one hand and respondent on the other hand, are Central Government Organisations. There are circulars issued from time to time, which are to the effect that wherever disputes arise between two central government organizations or agencies, they shall be resolved otherwise than through judicial proceedings. In fact the Supreme Court in Oil and Natural Gas Commission v. Collector of Central Excise[1] emphasized this aspect. Therefore, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed and the order in T.A.No.109 of 1990 is set aside. ______________________ (L. Narasimha Reddy, J.) 11th September, 2009 Js. [1] Judgment Today 1991 (4) SC 158