Writ Petkkm (S) No. 2269 Of 2008 Pet§t5oners 1 . k) Jagamath Ram, aged about 51 years, son of Shri Lundru Ram, Gangman, Rio. VH! Mahuatolé. Pest Gfflce — KunkurL DEstt. Jashpur (CG) (Date of Nehm Ram, aged abouf53 years, son of $hri Lodo Ram, Gangman, Rio Viii PakanoH, Post Office Gharaidand, 0km. JaShpur (CG) {dt of appt — 1.4.1976) Gregory, aged about 4O years, sen cf Shri Kaiyan, Gangman. Rib. Viii Khadsa, Pt? - Ehamidand, Distt‘ Jashpur (CG) (Dt of appt 8.1 1 .1 989) Muneshwar Ram, aged about 42 years. son of Shri Neeraka; Ram. Gangman, Rio. Jagatpur, PO Bagicha Distt. Jashpur (CG) (Dt of appt 8/99) $astu Ram, aged absut 42 yeara son of Shri Rakhan, Gangman, R/o. Viii Sanna. Post Sanna Diett. Jashpu! (CG) (D: of appt 1 .1 .90) Kirsun .a., aged about 41. year—s, san af Shri Mitku Ram, Gangman, Rfo Gamhar Kona, Post CfFice Eaneshar, Distt. Jashpur (CG) (Dt of appt — 1.1.1990) 5M Ramaram. aged about 39 years, son of Shré Birba! Ram, Gangman, Rlo Viii & Post Rauni, distt. Jashpur (CG) (D: of app: 1.1 .90) Eeonath Ram, aged about 40 years, son of Shri Tuk1a Ram, Gangman. Fjo. VIH and post Senna, Distt. Jashpur (CG) (Dt of appt -— 1/1/90) appointment — 1 .1 1 .1§?6) hi l" r“Ar ‘D 10. 11. /4. .. i,v ; ,. . Hangar: Ram. aged about 46 yeais. son of $hri Dhanesh Nagesiya, Gangman, RIO. Vii! sardeh, Post $anna Diott. Jashpur (CG) (Dt of appt 1.1.90) Vijay Lakda. aged about 41 years. son of 8hri Chunu Lakda, Gangman, Rio Viu Chanda-deepa. Post Sanna, Distt. Jashpur (CG) (D1 of appt 1 .1 .1990) Manna Ram. aged about 42 years, son of Shri Baku. Gangman. R/o. V11! and Post Sanna Disit. Jashpur (CG) (Dt of app: =1. .1 .1 990) Manshu Ram. aged about 41 years son of Shri Saavna, Gangman Rio. Vill and Post Sanna D1511. Jashpur (CG) (Dt of appt — 1 .1 .1§90) H1GH COURT OF CHHATTESGARH AT BILASFUR & 13. Donatus Beg, aged abeut 52 years, son of Shri Mathura Beg, Gangman, R/c. W! Ramsama, Pest Karma, Distt. Jashpur (CG) (Dt sf appt — 1/4i93) Versus Respondents 1. $tate sf Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Pubiic Works, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief Executive Engineer, Department of Pubric Warke, Divrsion — Jashpur. Distt. Jashpur (CG) 3. Sub Divisional Ofmer Public Works Department, Sub Diviskm — Kunkuri. DisttJ Jashpur (CG) 4. Sub Divisiona! Offrcer Public Works Department, sub Divisron — Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) WRH' PETITOEN UNDeR ART§CLE 226 GF THE CONSTI‘TUTIéN OF iNDiA srngRe Bench : Hon'bte Mr. Satrsh K. Agnrhotri, J. ; , Shri F. S. Khare, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Alok Bakshi. Gevt. Advocate for the tespondents. ;.. ORAL ORDER (Paesed on thie 21$ day of Aptii, 20%) Wit. the consent of learned counse! appearing for the parties the matter is heard fmaliy. The petitioners are working in Puhiio Works Department. Leatned counsei appearing for the petitioners as well as teamed counsei appearing for the respondents/State jointly submit that the question of iaw, invoived in the present Wtit petition, is the same asto that oi in Govind & others Vs. State of C.G. & Others {2007 (2) C.G.L.J. 29}. wherein it is heid that the permanent gangmen are entitied to he retired on attaining the age of 62 years, in acoordanoe with the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhiniyam, 1867. r3» Learned counse! appeafing for the {espsndentsfState further submits that §f {he case of the paitioners is 0a the 3ame foo$ings, there is no feasan ts deny them the benefits avaiEame to the permanent gangmeh. Accerding£y, this wr§t eetition is allowad in terms ef the erder passed in the case cf Gevind & others {were}, subject re verrr'rcation 6f the fact aste whether the petitieners have acqurree the status of permanent gengmen. Ne order aste caste. 7 Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ' Sd/-