IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 1ST MARCH 2011 / 10TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(Crl.).No. 64 of 2011(S) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): --------------------- UVAISE, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.ABDUL LATHEEF RAMANATTU PURAYIDAM, PO, KANJIRAPPILLY, POOTHAKKUZHY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, KERALA. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PALAKKAD-678 001. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALAMBUZHA POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT 673 009. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALAMBUZHA POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT 673 009. 4. RAJAN M.V, "RESHMI NILAYAM" GANDHI NAGAR, P.O, MALAMBUZHA,PALAKKAD DISTRICT 673 009. R1 TO R3 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.K.BABU. R4 BY ADV. SRI.A.R.GANGADAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPCR.NO.64 OF 2011-S PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1.TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT OF MARRIAGE ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE SAID “MANJUSHA”. K.M. JOSEPH & M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(CRL).NO. 64 OF 2011 S ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 1st March, 2011 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. Petitioner has sought for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for production of the alleged detenu, Manjusha. Allegation of illegal detention is made against the fourth respondent. The fourth respondent is none-other-than the father of the alleged detenu. 2. Briefly put, the case of the petitioner is that the petitioner and the alleged detenu were in love and in order to show their intention of entering into a matrimony, executed Ext.P1 agreement of marriage. There are allegations of detention also. 3. We had passed an interim order dated 21.2.2011 wherein we had noted the statement of the alleged detenu that the alleged detenu is in love with the petitioner. We had directed the alleged detenu to reside with her parents, noticing that there is no case of W.P.(CRL).NO.64 OF 2011 S 2 illegal detention. 4. Today, the alleged detenu was again present. We interacted with her and the petitioner and allowed them to interact with each other. We allowed the petitioner to interact with the mother of the alleged detenu and the brother of the alleged detenu. We also allowed the alleged detenu to interact with the mother of the petitioner. 5. The alleged detenu would say that she may be permitted to go with her father as she wants to pursue her education. She would reiterate that she is in love with the petitioner. In such circumstances, we close the Writ Petition. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/= M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE kbk. //True Copy// W.P.(CRL).NO.64 OF 2011 S 3