IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29436 of 2009 1. RAM JINIS RAI 2. DINESH RAI 3. BECHAN RAI 4. AMRESH RAI 5. JAGESHWAR RAI 6. GAGANDEO RAI 7. HEM CHANDRA RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 05/11/2009 In view of the fact that the petitioners were earlier on Police bail, the application for anticipatory bal is misconceived and the same is rejected. Any application for regular bail on their behalf is required to be decided in accordance with law in 2004(3) PLJR 491. AKS/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)