IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 14176 of 2005 Between: Smt. N. Manorama, W/o. M. Naga Raju, R/o Bandapalle Village, Devankonda Mandal, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 2 The Joint Collector, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Adoni, Kurnool District. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Devanakonda Mandal, Kurnol District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents cancellation of authorisation and subsequently dismissing the appeal filed by the petitioner consequently set side the orders passed by the 3rd respondent herein vide RCI/1270/04 dated 24-12-2004 and order of the 2nd respondent dismissing the appeal R.C.No. CS3/44/2005 dated 21-4-2005 and restore the authorisation by alloting the commodities. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. R.RAMANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court, at the stage of admission, made the following : ORDER: The petitioner’s authorization was suspended by the Revenue Divisional Officer concerned on 24-12-2004. The petitioner filed an appeal before the 2nd respondent and also a Writ Petition No.322 of 2005 before this Court. This Court disposed of the said Writ Petition directing that the respondent continue the Writ Petitioner till the disposal of the appeal by the appellate authority. By the impugned order, dated 21- 04-2005, the 2nd respondent rejected the appeal on the ground that the petitioner is found to be a resident of Kurnool, where her husband is working as a Junior Assistant in the Municipal Corporation and was running a fair price shop, benami, in Bandapalle village in violation of the relevant control order and in a manner that defeats the objects of the public distribution system. As against this order of the 2nd respondent, the petitioner preferred a revision on 07-05-2005 to the 1st respondent, which is stated to be pending. The petitioner’s substantial complaint is that the 1st respondent has not disposed of the Writ Petition. 2. In the aforesaid circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to expeditiously dispose of the revision of the petitioner preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as above. ______________________ (GODA RAGHURAM,J) 1st July, 2005. tsy To 1 The District Collector, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 2 The Joint Collector, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Adoni, Kurnool District. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Devanakonda Mandal, Kurnol District. 5 Two CCs to the GP for Civil Supplies, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (O.U.T.)1) 2 CD copies 6 Two CD Copies.