IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 845 of 2011. Decided on: 14th March, 2011. Puran Bhadur. …Petitioner. Vs. State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “(i) That writ in the nature of mandamus may very kindly be issued against the respondents by directing them to regularize the services of the petitioner w.e.f. due date, i.e. August, 2007 with all consequential benefits in the light of judgment rendered by this Hon’ble Court on 28.7.2010 in CWP No.2735/2010 titled as Rakesh Kumar vs. State of H.P. and as per letter dated 3.10.2007 (Annexure P-2) and as per policies of the State Government for regularization issued from time to time.” 2. The petitioner claims regularization on completion of eight years of continuous service as daily wager. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in his favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No.2735 of 2010, 2 Rakesh Kumar vs. State of H.P. and others. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment, referred above. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 14th March, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr) Judge.