1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 281 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 586 OF 2005 Bankim Rasiklal Shah ...Applicant Versus The Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Naveen Chomal for the Applicant Ms. Heena Shah for Respondents No. 1 and 2 Mr. K.V. Saste, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and F.M. REIS, JJ. DATE: MARCH 31, 2009 P.C.:- The applicant is suffering 14 years' imprisonment under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985. He contends that he is suffering from cancer, and is being treated. On an earlier occasion, this Court granted him bail for some period, which was ultimately extended by order dated 11th November, 2008 for one month. In this order, the Court observed as under:- “..we take sympathetic view and extend the period for one month on understanding and undertaking that after that he will surrender to the bail.” 2. Thereafter, it appears that another application was made, 2 which was decided on 11th December, 2008. Again, by its order, the Court observed as under:- “..we grant eight weeks time subject to condition that henceforth no temporary bail will be granted and/or extended by this Court.” 3. Thereafter, it appears that he was granted parole by the authorities also. 4. In view of the earlier orders of this Court, and in view of the fact that the applicant can be treated at the jail itself, we do not find it necessary to grant him further bail in the matter. However, the jail authorities are directed that as and when his doctors need to see him for advice and treatment, the jail authorities shall make arrangements to take the prisoner to the said doctors. 5. This application is accordingly disposed of. BILAL NAZKI, J. F.M. REIS, J.