1 Wp 10521.11 Kambli IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10521 OF 2011 ... The State of Maharashtra ...Petitioner v/s. Shri Baliram Bapurao Pakhare ...Respondent ... Mr.A.B.Vagyani, AGP for the Petitioner. Mr.Kishor R. Jagdale for the Respondent. ... CORAM: D.K.Deshmukh & Anoop V. Mohta, JJ DATED: 22nd December, 2011 P.C.: Rule. Returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. 2. It was pointed out by the learned AGP that in the order imposing punishment on the Respondent it is clearly recorded that at the time of hearing the Respondent- employee admitted that the certificates produced by him are false. According to the learned AGP, however, the order of the MAT no where deals with this. 2 Wp 10521.11 3. By consent of parties, the order of the MAT is set aside. Original Application is remitted back to the MAT for denovo consideration and decision in accordance with law. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (D,K.DESHMUKH, J.)