IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 15TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 24TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 30399 of 2011(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- RENJI ABRAHAM, AGED 25 YEARS, D/O.ABRAHAM VARGHESE, LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, AIDED UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL (AUPS), VADAKKEPOTTA, PALAKKAD, RESI:KOZHIPLAKEEL HOUSE, OLIYAPURAMI POST, KOOTHATTUKULAM, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.S.SARAT RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD-678 001. 4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD-678 501. 5. THE MANAGER, AUPS, VADAKKEPOTTA, PALAKKAD-678 001. BY SR.GOVT.PLEADER SHRI M.A.FAYAZ R1 TO R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 30399 of 2011(Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 1.6.2010. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 15.5.2010. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE AEO TO 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 6.10.2010. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE STAFF FIXATION PROCEEDINGS ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 3.9.2010. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 25.6.2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE dsn T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.30399 of 2011 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 15th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner, a Lower Primary School Assistant working in the 5th respondent-school is seeking for a direction to the Director of Public Instruction to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P5 revision petition filed under Rule 8A of Chapter XIV-A KER. 2. Exhibit P3 is the order passed by the Assistant Educational Officer, whereby the approval of appointment of the petitioner stands rejected. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the said order was not communicated to the petitioner and when he came to know about the same, the revision petition has been filed. 3. I am not going into the merits of the matter, since it is upto the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on the revision petition. 4. There will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P5 revision petition after W.P.(C)No.30399/11 -2- hearing the petitioner and the Manger within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will forward a copy of the Writ Petition along with a copy of this judgment to the 2nd respondent for compliance. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn