HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.1878 of 2011 Date: February 15, 2011 Between: Dr. Md. Husaamuddin Sharief, S/o.Md.Riazuddini Sharief, aged 25 years, student, R/o.5/21, ROB Main Street, Rayapet, Chennai-600014 … Petitioner And The Government Nizamia Tibbi College, Charminar, represented by its Principal (FAC) Hyderabad and others … Respondents Order: Petitioner has appeared for entrance test for admission into M.D. Unani for the academic year 2010-11 conducted by the second respondent-university. It is his case that as per the rules of admission, candidates sponsored by the State Governments from States which do not have Post Graduate courses offering MD(PG) level education will be considered for nomination as Government of India nominees and such nomination is to be made based on the ranks obtained in the entrance test. His grievance is that though the fourth respondent herein has obtained lesser marks than him in the entrance test, he is selected for the academic year 2010-11. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of second respondent-university. On obtaining instructions, it is submitted by learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of second respondent-university that though third respondent- college has addressed the university by letter dated 19- 01-2011 furnishing the list to be provisionally selected for the academic year 2010-11 under nomination by the Govt. of India, no candidate was selected and fourth respondent was not nominated by the Government of India for the purpose of admission to M.D., Unani and admissions were closed by 31-12-2010. It appears; this writ petition is filed based on letter No.3027/B/NTC/2010 dated 19-01-2011, which is addressed by third respondent-college to second respondent-university and also the Under Secretary, Govt. of India. Merely because a letter is sent annexing the list of candidates, it cannot be construed that such candidates are admitted into the course. As much as it is stated that fourth respondent is not admitted into the course in question and admissions were already closed by 31-12-2010, I see no reason to admit this writ petition for grant of relief prayed for. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. However, if any candidate who has secured lesser marks than the petitioner herein is admitted into the course in question, it would be open to the petitioner to come up with a fresh writ petition. ___________________ (R. SUBHASH REDDY, J) February 15, 2011 MRR