IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.19163 of 2011 Date of Decision : October 13, 2011. St.Paul Convent Public High School, Hathin .....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Naveen Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.R.D.Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.R.D.Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Let four copies of the writ petition be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of day failing which the order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioner-School seeks a mandamus to respondent Nos.1 & 2 to include its name amongst the recognized existing schools. As per CWP No.19163 of 2011 [2] the averments made, the Society known as St.Paul Convent Shiksha Samiti, which runs the petitioner-School, was registered on 31.7.1997 and it started running the petitioner-School from the academic session 1997-98. The petitioner-School was granted permanent recognition upto Class-V in the year 2000 which was upgraded upto Class VIII level in the year 2001 followed by temporary recognition upto Class-X in the year 2002. The petitioner-School is said to have submitted an application in the prescribed form on 20.3.2007 for the grant of permanent recognition upto class-X. It is also averred that the petitioner-School fulfills all the eligibility conditions laid down in the Government notification dated 21.2.2009 issued on the subject. It is alleged that the petitioner-School has made several representations to the authorities and has removed the objections raised one after the others, yet the permanent recognition has not been granted so far. In these circumstances and having regard to the nature of relief sought by the petitioner-School, however, without expressing any views on its entitlement, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to consider the claim of the petitioner- School for permanent recognition by taking appropriate decision within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. October 13, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE