IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9388 of 2010 Raj Kumar Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court-III, Faridabad and another Present: Mr.Ram Bilas Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner was appointed as Beldar in the office of respondent No.2 on daily wages. He was discharged from duty. In between, he was not allowed to join duties and was terminated on 30.11.1996 The petitioner served a demand notice, which led to reference of the dispute for adjudication before the Labour Court. Labour Court has passed the impugned award, which, now the petitioner-workman has challenged through the present writ petition. The finding by the Labour Court is that the petitioner could not succeed in proving that he had worked from 28.8.1996 to 30.11.1996. Documents produced were the copies of log books, original of which was not produced. The record was also not summoned. Joginder Singh WW-2, working as Tool Driver was examined and had placed on record the copy of log book entries, but the original thereof was not summoned to be produced. Neither any official from the office of respondent No.2 was summoned by him to prove that he had worked for particular number of days. The finding as recorded is that no record from the office of respondent No.2 was summoned, to be produced by the petitioner- workman. When the case came up for hearing on 20.5.2010, the counsel had taken time to verify whether the petitioner-workman had moved any application before the Labour Court for production of record or not. The counsel confirms that he had never moved any application for summoning the record. Once the workman has failed to prove the facts of his service details, the Labour Court findings cannot be faulted. No case for interference in the impugned award is made out. Dismissed. September 29, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE