FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICTION NO. 8843 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4074 OF 2011 "Mahatma Gandhi Taluka Shikshan Mandal's Smt. Sharadchandrika Suresh Patil College of Pharmacy, Chopda, Dist. Jalgaon Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. Bharat R. Waramma, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi,Assistant Govt. Pleader for respondent No. 1. Mr. M.V. Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM :- D.B. BHOSALE & S.B. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE :- 28TH JULY, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] This civil application is filed in a disposed of writ petition for the following prayer :- "A] Pending the hearing and final disposal of this petition the 20% seats in M. Pharmacy Courses be permitted to fill in at institutional level on merit and/or the respondents be restrained from filing 20% seats to M. Pharmacy Course till decision of respondent No.2”. 2] We disposed of the writ petition vide order dated 24th June, 2011, on the basis of the statement made by learned FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICTION NO. 8843 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4074 OF 2011 "Mahatma Gandhi Taluka Shikshan Mandal's Smt. Sharadchandrika Suresh Patil College of Pharmacy, Chopda, Dist. Jalgaon Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 counsel for respondent No.2 - Samiti. The relevant portion of the order dated 24/6/2011, reads thus :- "Learned counsel for respondent No.2 – Samiti, on instructions submits that respondent No.2 – Samiti will withdraw the impugned decision dated 20/4/2011, and will reconsider the petitioner's proposal afresh and pass reasoned order in respect of Item No.5(C) of the minutes of meeting. His statement is recorded and accepted. In view of the statement, nothing further survives in the petition. Hence, the petition is disposed of .” 3] Learned counsel for the petitioner invited our attention to the averments made in the writ petition, and more particularly, to the para.5 thereof. He also invited our attention to the order passed by this court in W.P. N. 4897/2008. He then submitted that the first and last round for admission was fixed on 27th July, 2011. In our opinion, none of these submissions advanced by the learned counsel for applicants will help the applicants to seek the relief as prayed for, in the application. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICTION NO. 8843 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4074 OF 2011 "Mahatma Gandhi Taluka Shikshan Mandal's Smt. Sharadchandrika Suresh Patil College of Pharmacy, Chopda, Dist. Jalgaon Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 3 4] Mr. Deshpande, learned counsel for the respondent Samiti, on instructions, submits that the Samiti will be considering the petitioner's proposal afresh in their meeting scheduled to be held on 9th August, 2011. 5] In view thereof, we do not find any reason to entertain the prayer made in the civil application. Hence, civil application is rejected. However, we observe that the respondent – Samiti shall take final decision on the petitioner's proposal on 9.8.2011 itself. [S.B. DESHMUKH,J.] [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] grt/-