c' .^Af IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR C.G. IN THE MATTER OF:- HAJI ABDUL HAMEED, AGED 59YRS, S/0 SHRI ABDUL GAFFAR, R/0 SHUKLA CHOWK, OPPOSITE AJEET SUNAR, RAIPUR C.G. W.P.No^7^2002 PETITIONER VERSUS 1. M.P.STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THROUGH THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, HEAD OFFICE HABIBGANJ .wX--fiy.:- BHOPAL[M.P^ - - .^-y^ ^%%^ 2.DIVISIONAL MANAGER, .-••'"^y'' M.P.STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPO.. '<sp'^^y ^;c' AMANAKA, RAIPUR [C.G.]. 3.THE CHIEF ACCOUNT OFFICER, M.P.S.R.T.C. HEAD OFFICE HABIBGANJ, BHOPAL [M.P-] WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WMT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND ANY OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION AS DEEM FIT.:— liiilan wwre%<fra» ^wr^^iyt'y,. axtfe'ifi^tei-yi<. ..la.,!:..^^...,.^.?^.. 200 3II^T:q^ t^S^t) .311^1 qilft'fi* 7 c~. ^ffsn^r^ite WBWBftff 3)I^H 16.09.2002 SIur'Pradeep Saxena, coHns Since SIiTi-DhiFcndra; Mis] Mislica il'fbrfhe petitioaer; wiho usuall^ appcar for the M.P.Statc Road Ti'aiispbrt eorpQi^.tioa hcillg prcscrLt iii fh.c Courf, ^.P.S.R.T.C. :^,- . , / is:asked to lakc :noticc on fec&alfo Heard. In view ofifhelimited na.tia^itef^ffie ccirrbTQversy raised. ia tfae he served ia iss'iling notice aad tir)g'as thie saine caa be disposed of wtll Mt: relsased in hisifavour for wliich he by directing the respondents to grajuity to thc pctitioncr, as is d^ 4>I^I<A'tJ1'11Trt^ff ^f fst3t ^R^R ^ aifiici sil^l • wnt petitioi:!, no useful purpose iu lceeping fhe w.rit petition pendi4i at fb.e adnussiQn. state. ; The; petttiDner was afi..'eittRlc}xee ,of fiie M,PiS.'R.TiG. aiad. a&er- Mlding vaiaEiits posts^^^te fi-oii( ftie service ofthe Corporation on 30,6.200:1;- His gneyaace is thattjliough fhe amotuit payable to him. towards giatuity;has beea work^d out, the same has not been is faciiig hardship. liit ftie above view offtie mat(er, fb.e wiit petition is disposed of |ake prompt steps ta. paymg the ^e-adinissiblc to fb.c pctitioner, at an carly date prEferably within a ^enod of4.weeks Iroia. the dat^^ ^ -Lcp1^1^I?.iii<"at10Tl/seTy1r']fa "^ ^^_^^^Tj ^ ^'la^_i'c^ rt^t f^<^rlr* t^<°L GRPRJ—FS/350—12/2QOO—50,000;*' -•;.-•• '. : . ' -2-- ,— " ^U^---!W-..-^W:.--»ts--J^"S^f"hv^--A'i9L-SW. XI-HC—78• a-ai^t ^ <^OT? ?rqi SiiSW afflW ^ST "MI<<|<1<1, ®Ti|y4|(o,t^Trey !^P WS' «i*.n*IK fepN'«nwfn-fs^? TfSre?R ^is^<-i ^j^ petitioner raay approach thej appropiiate authority uiider Section 8 of fhe Payinent of the|Gratiuty Act, 1972 and ta ease , •A such appUcation is jnadc, ftie ajufhority undcr fhc said Act wiQ do wcU to take pronipt and e|Efcct steps for recoveiy of the amount as is duc adinissiblc t^> fhe pefitioner uiider thc said Act. of. •f With fhe aforesaid directic^n, the petition stands disposed Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- P. C. Naik Judge :]: f<