IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 22631 of 1994 Between: 1. Vasupilli Samba Murthy, s/o Sattayya, aged about 32 yrs, H.No. 2438, Kalingapatnam, Srikakulam District, 2. Muddada Satyam s/o Appala Suri Naidu, R/o H.No. 381, Kothavalasa, Rajam Mandal, Srikakulam District 3. Jami Rameswara Rao s/o Paidi Setti aged about 31 yrs, R/O. 4050, Visakhapatnam, ..... PETITIONERS AND 1. The Govt. of A.P. represented by its Secretary Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, 2. The District Collector-cum-Chairman of the Selection Committee, Srikakulam District, Srikakulam, 3. The District Collector-cum-Chairman of the Selection Committee, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatnam .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or directions declaring that G.O.Ms.No. 221, Education Department, dated 16.07.1994 as unconstitutional and illegal and further direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as teacher, in the existing vacancies in the A.P. State Controlled Bodies along with the petitioners covered by the order of this Hon’ble Court by Sri Justice S.R.Nayak in W.P.M.P.No.17958/94 etc. in W.P.Nos. 17104/94 and batch dated 08.09.1994 after declaring that Art. 323-A, Cl. 2 (d) of the Constitution and Section 28 of A.P. Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 as unconstitutional for violating the basic structure. For the Petitioner: MR.P.VEERA REDDY, Advocate (not present) For the Respondents: . G.P. for Education The Court made the following : O R A L O R D E R There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 15-07-2004, consequently, the matter has been posted to 27.08.2004 under the caption ‘for dismissal’ and again it was posted to today. Today when the matter is called, neither the petitioners nor their counsel are present and there is no representation on his behalf. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. ______________________ 09th September, 2004 vp ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Secretary, Education Department,Govt. of A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad, 2. The District Collector-cum- Chairman of Selection Committee, Srikakulam Dist. Srikakulam, 3. The District Collector-cum-Chairman of the Selection Committee, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatnam 4. 2 C.Cs to Govt. Pleader for Education, High Court buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 5. 2 C.D. copies.