IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 23RD OCTOBER 2007 / 1ST KARTHIKA 1929 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2428 of 2007() ------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 28/04/2007 IN CRMP. 569/2007 IN CC.63/2005 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-I, PATHANAMTHITTA .................... REVN. PETITIONER: PETITIONER ---------------------------- RENJITH S.RAJAN, AGED 22, S/O.SOMARAJAN, ERANNUR HOUSE, KURIYANNOOR P.O., THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SASI RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT ----------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.S.SIVAKUMAR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl. M.A. No. 12849 of 2007 in Crl.R.P. No. 2428 of 2007 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 10th December 2007 ORDER This is a petition for re-hearing Crl. R.P. No. 2428 of 2007 which was disposed of on merits as per final order dated 23-10-2007. Apart from the fact that there is no provision enabling this Court to re-hear a Criminal Revision which has been disposed of on merits, this Court had confirmed the order passed by the lower court refusing to discharge the revision petitioner/7th accused after holding that there is a prima facie case for trial. The remedy of the petitioner is to stand trial and try to get an acquittal if it is permissible. I see no ground to entertain this petition which is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani.