IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH : HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH (26TH) DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN Present: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Civil Revision Petition No.2695 of 2009 Between: M Venkateswara Rao … Petitioner And: Muralikrishna … Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Civil Revision Petition No.2695 of 2009 ORDER: This revision is directed against the docket order dated 26.08.2008 in IA No.1888 of 2007 in OS No.906 of 2006 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, R R District, wherein the said petition filed by the petitioner herein under Order VI Rule 17 CPC seeking amendment of the plaint, was dismissed as being vague. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the respondent. Perused the record. 3. The petitioner herein filed suit for recovery of certain amount allegedly due by the respondent. The petitioner filed IA No.1888 of 2007 seeking amendment of the plaint pertaining to the date on which the cheque was encashed. According to the petitioner, he has mentioned approximate date of encashment as 05.11.2001. But after receiving the statement of account from the bank, it was noticed that the encashment was on 08.11.2011. The petitioner therefore sought amendment of the said date, altering the same from 05.11.2001 to 08.11.2001 in the plaint. 4. Necessary averments were made in the affidavit filed in support of the application regarding the proposed amendment. The prayer in the petition is however silent as to the description of the proposed amendment. The trial Court therefore dismissed the said application on the ground that the prayer in the petition was vague. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks an opportunity to file fresh application describing the proposed amendment properly in the petition also. 6. In the circumstances, the impugned order is set aside and the civil revision petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file fresh application for amendment of the plaint. On such application being made, the trial Court is directed to give an opportunity to the other side and dispose of the same on its own merits. No order as to costs. __________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J Date: 26.04.2011 Note: Issue CC in three days. (BO) bss