IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1723 of 2008 Date of decision: 24.2.2009 M/s Strategic Analysis India Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner Versus Ms. Vandana Sharma ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. S.S.Narula, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Jai Shree Thakur, Advocate for the respondent. S.D.ANAND, J. The view obtained by the learned Trial Court for the grant of requested injunction order was affirmed in Ist appeal by the learned Additional District Judge, Gurgaon. The plaintiff-petitioner had, through the injunction application, sought the restraint of defendant-respondent from disclosing whatever technical know how and confidential information she had obtained during the period of research that she had undertaken in pursuance of employment agreement dated 28.5.2002 executed between the parties to the cause. It is apparent that the plaintiff-petitioner had thereby sought enforcement of a negative covenant which could not be conceived by law. Even otherwise, both the Courts, in a categorical manner recorded a finding negativing the plea put forward by the plaintiff-petitioner. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the judicial discretion exercised by the learned Courts below in view of the fact that there is nothing illegal or perverse in the course thereof. Dismissed. February 24, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge