@ CNJJK X/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF EHHATTISGARH AT BI LASPUR writ Petition m. 77'Z__/2ooz Pyggrmmas 1. sushi; Kumar Agrawa'l, son of shri Vishnu Prasad Agrawal, aged abaut 31 years, Occu- pation -— Journalist ( Distt. Rep resent at ivej'fféek 1y ) “ ‘sangharsh Ke Swar " , Resi- dent of c/o sumeet Medical stores, Bamahni Bazar, Tehsil champ a, Di strict Janjhgir Champa, grgttisgarh . Anil Kumar singhania sen of shank arlal Si nghania aged about 40 years, resident of Bamhani Dih, Tehsil champa Distt. Janjhgir Champs, Occu- pation - Cultivator. Versui i f §§§PONDENTS z ./ state of chhattisgarh through Secret ary,~ Department of Public Grievance Redressal, Mantralaya, D.K . S.Bui 1ding. gaipur, ehhatt i sgarh . / K‘F‘rfm ‘7 2 . Co llector, Janjhgir champa. Chhattisgarh. W x. , 531w 3 . superintendent of Police. Janjhgir Champa: yx. , chief wecutive officer. Janpad panchayat. Bamhani Dih, DiStrict Janj hgir Champa . 5. Ramlal sehare son of Gudgu Mahara, Adhyak a sba, Janp ad P anchaYat , Bamhni Dih. Tehsil Champa, Distt. Janjhgir champa, chhattisgarh. 1;}? 6. Dr. mhanlal Seharé son of Gudgu Mahara, occupation Service, Assistant surgeon, Presently placed under sus- pension attached to the office of Chief Medical and Health Officer, gilaspur CHI-IATTI SGARy/s’ x ” PETITIO-g UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA NR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF Qua magma, AGAINs'r RESPONDENT m.§_goR ms RmOVAL FROM THE OFFICE OF ADHYAKASHA,AND ALSO THE wgyr oF‘CER'rIORARI, MANDAMUS. pRoHIBrrIoL AND ‘FOR__0_THER Wgigs' ORDERS OR DIR$TIONS. f t ’In View of the limited nature of dispute involved iii this writ hetition the Court feels that no useful purpose would'be sen/ed in keeping this writ petition pending and accordingly on the prayer and consent of the learned cOunsel r the parties the petition has been disposed of at the admission sta e The main prayer in this rit petition is for a direction to the mspondents No.1 to 4'to make a due and proper enquiry into the allegations and complaints made by the petin'oners regarding the status and caste of respondents No.5 an 6. According, to the petiu‘oners though the said respondents do not belong to a reserved community yet, on the ba‘sis of false caste certificates, they are 1 enjoying the benefits reserved far scheduled castes category and on i ‘the basis of‘false caste ceitmcates they are also occupying public n i X »HC—22 3%: W, m, m \p P M2 Tn] o2, mm g3 200 m2: m w ‘ri m W 3mm VF?! mmmm WW f? f—v?W $ swat; W?! 18-10-2002 Shri Mam'ndxa Shn'vastava, counsgl for the petitioncrs. Shri San'jay K AgaIWal, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents No. 1, 2 8o 3. Shn‘ mspondce:§;.4. Shn‘ Ranbir Singh, Govt. ’Adv. for the ‘ Shri V.R. .Tiwari, counsel fé'r the respondents No.5 85 6. Heard, W L M'u§wm A éam‘ am \ , oEces. Alemm has been med o: - which it is indicated thatthe man \ committee. In view of the above, the p61 a decision on its gén merits after said high-level commithec to fake hearing all the paiiies within the‘ date [of communication] receipt of _ clear that the Court is not expre: the contention raised before it. With the above direco‘on, thé Certified copy as per rules. 1 behalf of the State government in Br has been referred to a high-level ition is disposed of by directing the .. 'yr : period of thxee._months mm the the older of this Court. It is made ising any opinion on the merits of : petitionstauds disposed of. 1 Sd/- L I‘ / P-C-Naik Judge a r:f