IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 6TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 15TH KARTHIKA 1930 RP.No. 1016 of 2008(M) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.20072/2008 Dated 16/07/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- K.C.AHAMMED, S/O.IMBICHI MAMMAD, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER IMBICHI MAMMED, S/O.IMBICHI MOIDEEN, KIZHAKKE CHERUKUNNUMEL HOUSE, P.O.ULLIYERI, KOYILANDY TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.V.N.RAMESAN NAMBISAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDHYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (TRANSMISSION) TRANSMISSION CIRCLE, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, KANNUR. BY ADV.SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, KSEB THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.M. JOSEPH, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` R.P. No. 1016 OF 2008 in W.P.(C) No. 20072 OF 2008 M ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 6th day of November, 2008 O R D E R The writ petition came to be disposed of directing the additional 3rd respondent to disburse Rs.28,528/- to the petitioner within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of that judgment. According to the petitioner, there was a decision to pay an amount of Rs.54,348/- with interest in cost and that the writ petition came to be disposed of directing payment of only Rs.28,528/-. The learned standing counsel points out that actually the petitioner has suppressed the facts and O.P.No.257/03 had been filed before the District Court which is settled in the Adalath and thereafter, the petitioner filed I.A.No.168/08. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner had stated that he had filed O.P.No.257/03 but that related only to additional compensation and original compensation, namely Rs.54,348/-, was not released to him. RP.1016/08 : 2 : According to him, the issue relating to original compensation is not settled in the Adalath. According to the learned standing counsel, it is settled. Whatever that be, I feel that in the facts of this case, the R.P. is to be allowed. Accordingly, I allow this R.P. and the judgment in W.P.(C) No.20072/08 is recalled. Post the writ petition for hearing. (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) aks