HIGH COURTQF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH y /s' f-. '<^. \- I'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HON'BLE SHRI SUNILKUMAR SINHA, J. MCCNo.185of2009 1 Ku.Amarjeet Kaur, (Now Smt. Amarjeet Kaur) Aged about 23 years (now 37 years), D/o Late Harbhajan Singh Bedsha 2 Ranjeet sing Bedsha Aged about 20 Years (now 36 years) S/o Late Harbhajan Singh Bedsha 3 Ku. Paramjeet Kaur Bedsha (Now Smt Paramjeet Kaur) Aged about 19 years (now 35 years) D/o Late Harbhajan Singh Bedsha 4 Harjeet Singh Bedsha Aged about 18 Years, S/o Late Harbhajan Singh Bedsha (now dead) 5 Keharsingh Bedasha Aged about 72 years (now dead) 6 Smt Kartar Singh Kaur Aged about 66 years (W/o Kehar Singh (now dead) All resident of Pharasgaon, Tah Kondagaon, District Bastar '(MP) (now CG) VERSUS 1 Sardar Sardul Singh, S/o Kakasingh Charan, R/o Jail Road, Raipur, Truck Owner MPT 8607 2 Subhashchandra Mandal S/o Haran Mandal R/o Kumharpara, Jagdalpur, Truck Driver No.MPT 8607 3 The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (Now Present Address Jail Road, Kuthary Chowk Raipur, CG) r •^^'^—^v'-s^ 'r < <:. fe '. X ApDlication for restoration of M.A. No.378/1994. Present: Shri Shyam M. Tekchandani, learned counsel for the petitioners. ORDER (14th May,2009) The foliowing order of the Court was passed by RajeevGupta, C.J. Shri Shyam M. Tekchandani, learned counsel for the petitioners is heard on I.A. No.0172009, an application for condonation ofdeiay in filing the restoration petition. 2) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the appellant and .the grounds taken in the applicatlon, we are satisfied that the petitioners havejsucceeded in showing sufflcient cause for the delay in filing the restoration petition. . 3) I.A. No. 01/2009, therefore, is allowed and the delay in filing the restoration petition is hereby condoned. 4) Learned counsel for the petitioners is heard on the restoration petition. 5) The petitioners are seeking restoration of IVi.A.No.378/1994 which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 13.11.2007. 6) On'due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners and the groynds taken in the restocation petition, we are satisfied that the absence of the petjtioiners'/appellants' counsel on 13.01.2007 when s^. ifl' E M.A.No.378/1994 was taken-up for hearing was based on bona fide grounds. 7) M.C.C.No.185/2009, therefore, is altowed and M.A. No.378/1994 is restored to its original number. Sd/- ChiefJustice subbu Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge -('•. f-t ^: N