BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT ORGANISED BY THE KERALA HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE PRESENT : SRI.S.VENKITA SUBRAMANIA IYER (SENIOR ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) & SRI.K. J.THOMAS STANLEY(RETD.ADDL.DIST.JUDGE) WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH JANUARY 2008 / 10TH MAGHA 1929 Tr.Appeal(C).No. 19 of 2007() ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN Tr.PC.245/2007 Dated 12/11/2007 .................... APPELLANT/RESPONDENT -------------------- NITHYA JACOB, AGED 23 YEARS, D/O. JACOB ABRAHAM, KADAKETH HOUSE, MOOLAPPALLY, NEELESWARAM P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN RESPONDENT/ PETITIONER ----------------------- PUNNAN PHILIP. P., AGED 30 YEARS, S/O. LATE PHILIP P.MATHEW, PUSHPAMANGALAM, OPPOSITE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, M.K.K.NAIR ROAD, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI-25. BY ADV. S SREEKUMAR THIS TRANSFER APPEAL(CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR DETERMINATION AT LOK ADALAT AND THE PARTIES HAVING SETTLED THE MATTER, THE FOLLOWING AWARD IS PASSED IN TERMS OF SETTLEMENT. SRI.S.VENKITA SUBRAMANIA IYER (SENIOR ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) & SRI.K.J.THOMAS STANLEY (RETIRED ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE) --------------------------- TRANSFER APPEAL (C) No.19 OF 2007 -------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of January, 2008 A W A R D In accordance with the terms of settlement arrived at on 24.1.2008, the appellant and respondent along with their counsel are present. Under the said terms of settlement, the respondent has to return certain ornaments to the appellant. Similarly, the appellant has to return certain ornaments to the respondent. The details of both are given in the terms of settlement arrived at on 24.1.2008. In compliance with the said settlement, it is submitted that the ornaments have been returned by the respective parties. Another term of settlement is that the respondent will pay a consolidated sum of Rs.2,75,000/- (Rs. Two lakh seventy five thousand only) to the appellant in full and final settlement of all the claims arising from the marriage between the parties. The said amount is paid by the respondent to the appellant and it is received and accepted by the appellant. Transfer Appeal(c)No.19/2007 2 2. Counsel for the appellant and respondent submitted that the joint petition under section 10A of the Indian Divorce Act will be filed today itself. Appellant and learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the maintenance case will not be pursued and it will be represented as not pressed before the Family Court, Ernakulam. 3. Counsel for the appellant and respondent submitted that they will report the court that the original petitions 1167 & 1285/2007 as not pressed. They reiterate the stand that they are not pressing the said original petitions. It is submitted by the counsel on either side that Crime No.732/2000 of the Palarivattom Police Station will either be compounded or steps to quash the same will be taken. The counsel for the wife submitted on instruction from his client that she has no further complaint for the matter being closed. The Transfer Appeal (C) is settled as above. SRI.S.VENKITA SUBRAMANIA IYER (SENIOR ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) SRI.K.J.THOMAS STANLEY (RETIRED ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE) ps