IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.6248 of 2007 Date of Decision:- 25.02.2008 Smt.Krishna ....Petitioner(s) through Mr.P.R.Yadav, Advocate vs. Ved Parkash and another ....Respondent(s) through Mr.Sanjay Singh Chauhan, Advocate. *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 19.11.2007 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gurgaon whereby the petitioner's evidence has been closed. Notice of motion was issued and in response thereto, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the order. The petitioner is the claimant who lost her sole bread earner in a road accident. It is submitted that the evidence of one of the witnesses, who is alleged to have noticed the number of the delinquent vehicle, and summoning of the record of the judicial proceedings in a criminal case, are essential for just decision of the case. There appears to be merit in the contention raised on behalf of the petitioner. Consequently and for the reasons aforestated, this revision C.R. No.6248 of 2007 -2- petition is allowed; the impugned order dated 19.11.2007 is set aside and the learned Tribunal is directed to grant one more opportunity to the petitioner to produce the said witness. For the same date, the Ahlmad/Record Clerk of the Court concerned be also summoned through the Court process. February 25, 2008 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE