IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11724 of 2011 1. BABULAL RAM SON OF BHANGI RAM 2. NAUMI RAM SON OF RAMMURAT RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 11.4.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Initially police case was registered against unknown after four days of the occurrence. Subsequently, the complaint was filed by the same informant. In the police case the accusation was found false by the police and the final form was submitted but differing with same cognizance was taken. It appears that the order of cognizance was quashed by the High Court with a liberty to learned court below to pass fresh order. In the present case cognizance has been taken in the complaint case without considering the delay in filing complaint by the same informant. It appears that other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail vide Cr.Misc.No.9136 of 2011. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of 12 weeks from today in connection with Complaint 2 case No.218(C) of 2005 Trial No.1893 of 2010 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Kaimur at Bhabua, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. S.Ali/Narendra ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. )