-,_ 1/ 10. Krishna Ram Churendm, Age abou’r 54 year, Headmasfer, 5/0 La‘re shri Ghasiyar'am, Govt Middle School Naya Bazar‘, Rujham, Disf‘r. — Dur'g (C.G.) 11. Awadh. Ram Pisda, Age abouf 51 year, Headmasfer', S/o LaTe shri Ram Singh Pisda, Govt Middle School Kusumkasha, Dis’r’r. - Durg (6.6.) . Rikhi Ram Sihare, Age abou’r 53 year, Headmas’rer, S/o Lafe Shri Bisah’ Ram Sihare, Gov’r. Middle School Kilekoda, Disf’r. - Durg (C.G‘.) . Rup Narayan Sinha, Age aboui 52 year, AsTf. Teacher, S/o Shri Keju Ram Sinha, Govt Primary School BhurkabhaTa, Dis’rf. e Durg (C.G.) 14. Shankar Lal Pisda, Age abouf 51 year, AsH. Teacher, S/o Lafe shri Bihau Ram Pisda, Govt Primary $chool Gujra, DisH. - Durg (C.G.) SfaTe Govt of Chha‘r‘risgarh, Through Secretary Educa’rion Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Disff.-Raipur (6.6.) Disf'r. Educcmon Officer, DisT’r. - Durg. (C.G.) As’rf. Commissioner, Trible welfare Deparfmenf Disff. - Durg (C.G.) Versus Respondenfs Block Educ‘a’rion Officer, Balod, Doundy Lohara, Disff. - Durg (C.G.) - Treasury, Accoun’rs & Penssion, Dis’rf. - Durg (C.6.) SB: Hon’ble Mr. Jusfice Safish’ K. Agnihofri, J Shri Somkanf Verma,‘ Advocafe for the 'pefifioners. Miss Sunifa Jain, Panel Lawyer for The responden’rs. ORAL ORDER (Passed on ihis 17”“ Day of June, 2008) 1. Wi’rh ’rhe consen’r of learned counsel appearing for ’rhe parfie‘s, The .mah‘er is heard finally. \\‘~\\\\ i l 2. Learned counsel appearing for The pe’ri‘l‘ioners submifs Thaf The pe‘rifioners were appoim‘ed as Depu‘ry Teacher on fixed pay scale of Rs. 100/—. AfTer comple’rion of probafion period, The petih‘oners were gram‘ed regular pay Scale. He further submifs ’rhaf ’rhe issue involved in fhe case is as‘ro whe'rher The peTiTioners are enTiTled To regulor pay scale w.e.f. The daTe of iniTiaI appoinTmenT or ofTer vcomple‘Tion of proboTion period. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by The Madhya Pradesh STaTe AdminisTraTive Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (MadhukanT Yadu and 56 oThers Vs. STaTe of M.P. & oThers), wherein iT was held ThaT The similarly siTuaTed Teachers are enTiTIed To regular pay scale w.e.f. The‘daTe of iniTiaI appoinTmenT. The maTTer was Taken-up To The Hon'ble Supreme CourT. The appeal was dismissed by The Hon'ble Supreme CourT upholding The decision of The Tribunal To The effecT ThaT The Teachers/AssisTanT Teachers are enTiTled To regular pay scale from The daTe of iniTiaI appoinTmenT. 4. In view of The above sTaTe submissions made by learned counselfor The parTies, The wriT peTiTion is disposed of in The same Terms i.e., The peTiTioners are granTed liberTy To make a represenTaTion, if so advised, To consider Their cases, if They sTand on The same fooTings, as per The order daTed 24.8.1992 passed by The Madhya Pradesh STaTe AdminisTraTive Tribunal, Jabalpur, in O.A.No. 2745 of 89 (MadhukanT Yadu) (supra) and subsequenTly confirmed by The order daTed 3.1.1994 passed by The Hon’ble'Supreme CourT in Special Leave PeTiTion (Civil) No. 6892/93 and granT relief accordingly. ‘5. In view of The foregoing, The peTiTion is disposed of. No order asTo cosTs. Satish K. Agnihotri a Judge Sd/- Thaur k