IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 4967 of 2008 Decided on: 22.09.2010 Rita Sood …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner. : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for the respondents . _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits on the basis of the instructions imparted to her that the petitioner stands regularized. However, she has not been paid salary for the vacation period. 2. Consequently, in view of the judgment rendered by this Court in Baldev Singh and others versus State of H.P. and others, CWP No. 415 of 2000, decided on 1st September, 2008, the respondents are directed to release due and admissible salary for the vacation period to the petitioner within a period of three months after the production of the certified copy of this judgment. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- 3. In view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge September 22, 2010 (K. Attri)