{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3054 of 2008 in SECOND APPEAL ST. NO.4991 OF 2008 Ramkishan s/o Chintamani Panchal and another Applicants Versus Nagorao s/o Chintamani Panchal & others Respondents Mr.P.R.Katneshwarkar, advocate for applicants CORAM : S.S.SHINDE, J. DATE : 16th November, 2011 PER COURT: Heard learned Counsel for the applicants. In spite of service of notice, none appears for respondents no.1 and 5. Counsel for Respondents No.2 to 4 is absent. Perused the contents of the application. In para 3 of the application, delay has been properly explained. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A). Delay stands condoned. Appeal to be listed for admission on 07.12.2011. S.S.SHINDE JUDGE adb/ca305408