SSM 1 23.aba.296.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 296 OF 2011 Shri. Vikas Damodar Dangat ....Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent _____________ Mr. Niranjan Mundargi for the Applicant. Mrs. P. P. Shinde, APP for the Respondent – State. CORAM: R. C. CHAVAN, J. DATED : 25 TH APRIL, 2011. P.C.: This is an application by Child Development Project Office who is allowed to have made Gram Arogya Poshan, Pani Puravatha and Swachchtha Committee to purchase a weighing machine which was worth Rs.1,000/- for Rs.6,100/-. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has not committed any wrong but to show his bonafides, the learned Counsel for applicant states that applicant would deposit Rs.5,100/- with the Trial SSM 2 23.aba.296.11 Court within two weeks from today. In view of this, the Applicant's being in interrogation custody may not be necessary. Hence in the event of the Applicant's arrest in the C.R. No.28 of 2011 registered with Khed Police Station, Pune, he be released on bail on furnishing PR Bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.10,000/- on the following conditions :- i) The applicant shall deposit a sum of Rs.5,100 with the Trial Court within a period of two weeks from today, which the leaned Trial Court shall invest in the nationalized bank to earn maximum interest and the learned trial Court shall deal with the same at the end of the trial as per result of case. ii) The applicant shall make himself available on 2 nd May, 2011 at 11.00 a.m. for interrogation by Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when required Investigating Officer. iii)The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with SSM 3 23.aba.296.11 the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. iv) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. v) If the amount is not deposited within the stipulated period, this order shall stand revoked, without further reference to the Court. vi) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of Maharashtra and ors, in S.L.P No.7615 of 2009. vii)The application stands disposed of accordingly. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)