,^2.''^^% ..^' —"^ 1 30-gC—78 M, ^T^T^T'f^W <^8T[ 3i{^{ s?>^i°n ^Ef ^TRT^PT, ^Ttl^i^ i<o, I^TRT^ ,..U.^to.^h.5.;.Q5......... *n*<(^^»HI<!^"""""";""'""uy""~'r"::/""""^20010) 3^n^?r 17?^ (^qlyt^) '^WR^Tf^T ^^ <^s<4?<n4)i ^i^<r?f °ff'fexst Tf^$T^ ^-stRR-B^T Sinfl!e_Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dhirdndra MJshra. J PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Versus 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 11.5.2009: Mr. B.D. Guru, tearned courjsel for the petitioner. Mr. UNS Deo, teamed GA f<^r the State. Heard. The petjtjoner has filed respondents to open the premise^ Glot^al Sanskriti Swasthya Evam Shitehan Sarr|jti, through its Vice President Shashank Verrha, S/o S.K. Verma, aged about 28 years, Khaj-e Complex, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (CG| Stat^ of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Dep(artment of Home AfFairs, DKS Bhawan, Mar|tralaya, Raipur (CG) Cotl^ctor, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (CG) Supierintendent of Police, Ambikapur, District Sar^uja (CG) Subj Divisional Magistrate, AmbSkapur, Distrtet Sar^uja (CG) Nayjab Tahsildar, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C<^) Dist|ict Education Officer, Ambikapur, District Sar^uja (CG) Boalrd of Higher Secondary Education, Delhi. regi^tered office at Rajputana, Lal Bhawan, Gorialpur Gaon O'imarpur). Post Offiee Azajdpur, Delhi-9. Writ petition under ArticBe 226 of the Constitution of India. jthe instent petition for direction to the of the petitionere Society, which hss been ,,^^:^%,, .,..--re~^l. "^ 'm^^^. "?*XI-HG—78 •i::^^^ ^TF^T ^r t^ri^ ^SH 31T^T^RW r-y F^- '^ ^ ^r ~T5f ^i^Krt^, ?$tft^<i(o, F®K<it"y^< *5(*IWS «»<tF^ WI200 ^?TTR^(^|(j^^) 'P^IW^f^ ^^ >- ^N?<?l<<1wf '^H^f ^* ft^ TN^TT ifr^tfmw^T illegally sealed by the Naib Tehsild^r, Ambikapur without any apparerrt reason and without affording any opportuni^y of hearing Leamed counsel for the petition on merits, however, he m^ before the CoHector, Ambikapur fo|' petition and the same may be deci^ within a specified period. Learned counsel for the representation before the grievances raised in this petition, within a further period of four representation in accordance with l^ In view of above submiss{c(ns instant petition is disposed of representation before respondent petition. On such representation and decided by respondent No.2 date of receipt of the representatior| l to the petitioner. petftioner submits that he is not pressing this jiy be permitted to fite fresh representation fo|' redressal of his grie^inces raised Sn this ped by the Coltector in accordance with law with St^te submite that if ttie petitioner files fresh Collec(or/respondent No.2 for redressat of his same shall be considered and decided jweeks from the date of receipt of the IW. of leamed counsel for the partes. the liberfy to the petitioner to ffle a fresh 1^0.2 raising all his grievances raised in Ihis made, the same shall be considered wpthin a further period of four weeks from the in accordance with law. —A Sd/- ^ Dhirendra Mishra Judge Cs^-^s.ff'.Ki-ft';«;..we?s-r;«.c;c'?-<ys-f-^.K^KfV^-,