IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPLN. FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR NO. 15 OF 2008 AMIT VENKATESH KAMAT ... Applicant Versus M/S. KAMAT AND COMPANY ... Respondent Mr. Joseph Vaz, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V. R. Tamba, Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date:- 19th June, 2009 P.C. Matter is taken up today as per the orders of this Court dated 12.06.2009. Advocate Mr. Tamba fairly states that his clients are ready and willing to proceed in arbitation before Advocate Mr. R. G. Ramani. 2. He however states that the said Arbitrator should also be authorised to consider claims made by the respondents in their reply to the present application and also to the legal notice. Advocate Mr. Vaz contends that the question whether it is arbitrable and arises under the agreement should be left open for the Arbitrator. 3. Accordingly Advocate Mr. R. G. Ramani is appointed as Arbitrator with the consent of the parties. He is at liberty to consider the claims raised by the parties as per the legal notice and also arising under the agreement between the parties. Application is accordingly allowed. B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. lh/.