IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12491 of 2009 DINESH PRASAD GUPTA @ DINESH KUMAR GUPTA, SON OF LATE KUNWAR SAH, PROPRIETOR OF M/S POONAM METAL INDUSTRIES AND PURCHASER OF M/S SHAKTI CHEMICALS, RESIDENT OF BAGHGHAR MORE, P.O. LALBAGH, P.S. UNIVERSITY THANA, DISTRICT DARBHANGA---PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, FRASER ROAD, PATNA THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIHAR STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, FRASER ROAD, PATNA. 3. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER(ZONE-II), BIHAR STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, FRASER ROAD, PATNA. 4. SRI B.K. SINHA, BRANCH MANAGER, BIHAR STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, MITHILA BRANCH, NEW INDL. ESTATE, BELA, DARBHANGA----RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02. 06.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the Bihar State Financial Corporation, Patna (hereinafter referred to as “the Corporation”). 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order of the Branch Manager of the Corporation dated 31.7.2009, Annexure-4 whereunder petitioner has been directed to deposit further amount of Rs. 80,694/- on the basis of the revised calculation. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he had purchased the unit in question from the Corporation under order bearing Memo No. 1209/1996- 97 dated 26.2.1997, Annexure-1 on standard terms and conditions approved by the Board of the Corporation but on account of mistake in Clause-6 of the order the rate of interest was wrongly mentioned as 20% instead of 13.5%. Highlighting such fact petitioner has filed representation before the Branch Manager of the Corporation dated 2 14.5.2009, Annexure-3. It is further submitted that till date such representation has not been considered. 4. Counsel for the Corporation, however, states that the representation dated 14.5.2009 has already been rejected by the Branch Manager of the Corporation. 5. Without going into the contention of the parties as to whether the representation dated 14.5.2009, Annexure-3 has been considered and disposed of, I direct the petitioner to file fresh representation before the Branch Manager of the Corporation highlighting the points taken in the representation dated 14.5.2009, Annexure-3, which should be considered by the Branch Manager of the Corporation in accordance with law as also the board decision taken in regard to sale of the unit in question in favour of the petitioner as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt of the representation of the petitioner along with a copy of this order. 6. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)