(D iNeiE a ZNTHEHON'BLB HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH .JUDICATURB AT BILA8PUR W.P. ( S) JVb. 6 F^ 7-/20J J ^ PBTITIONER:- </' ^ ,.•'' '^<^'^" ^ 1^<^\ v:o ...;':^"'"" ^••yy ^•:/ ^'..^~ ^" RESPONDBNTS:- ;'?BtIfil ',.'\ '%' . T / ^ ^|@i ^-^j^ /' Goinnd Lange S/o Shri Adhin Ram Lange Aged about 52 years Occij.pation -Assistant Veterinary Field Officer Veterinary Dispensary Naimed Dist-Bijapur fC.G.) VBRSUS ^' l,State of Chhattisgarh Through, Secretary , Department of Veterinary Development Mantralaya, D,K.S, Bhawan, RaipurfC. G.) 2. Collector , Bijapur Dist-Bijapur (C.G.) 3. Deputy Director , Veterinary services Bijapur Dist-Bijapur (C.G.) -tV- © 1 WRIT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ashok PETiTIONER RESPONDENTS HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETiTiON (S) N0. 6542 OF 2011 Govind Lange Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others CWrit Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Preserrt :- Ms. Deepaii Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panei Lawyerforthe State. ORDER (Passed o," this 08th day of November, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that vide order dateas 15.07.2010 (Annexure P/1), the petitioner, working as Assistant Veterinary Fleid Officer at Veterinary Dispensary Naimed, Distnct Sijapur, has been transferred to Veterinary Dispensary Koteia, District Kanker, on his own request. However, the petitioner has not yet been relieved to Join the new piace of posting. Ms. Pandey, further submits that once the order of transfer has been passed, 11 is for the government to ensure that it is compiied with jmmediately. He relies on a dedsion of the Supreme Court in SreedQHi Ciiandra Ghosh v. State ofAssani &othei's , in support of his contention that if the order is not compiled with, a direction can be Issued for enforcement thereof. 2. Shri Bhaduri, iearned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/ respondents submits that if the transfer order dated 15.07.2010 (Annexure P/1) is stili in existence and has not been compiied with, appropriate steps wouid be taken to comply wlth the order. 3. if the aforesald transfer order is still In exlstence, the governmen? is under an obligation to comply with the same at once. !t is accofdingiy directed that the transfer order shall be compiied with forthwith, wit-hin a period oftwo weeks. 4. Accordingly, thls petltion stands disposed of. • | Sd/- i SatishK.Agnihotri I Judge ^ ' (1996'510SCC567