1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9999 OF 2010 Saherunisa w/o Sk. Sattar Tamboli .. PETITIONER VERSUS The Collector & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. P.M. Kulkarni, advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Y.M. Kshirsagar, AGP for the State. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 21 st OCTOBER, 2010. PER COURT : 1 An interlocutory order passed by the trial court permitting the defendants / respondents to withdraw the amount deposited by the sugar factory in the court is subjected to challenge in this petition. 2 Considering the interlocutory nature of the order under challenge, no interference is called in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. It is made clear that the withdrawal of the amount by respondent no. 4 in pursuance to the order passed by the trial 2 court shall be subject to final adjudication by the civil court. Writ petition stands rejected. 3 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp9999.10.odt