1 SBCWP NO.5222/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5222/2009 Madhusudan Paliwal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of Order : : 26.05.2009 PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr.Sandeep Pathak, for the petitioner. BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by Annexure-7 dated 7.7.2008, the respondent No.1, Deputy Secretary to the Department of Personnel called the petitioner for the personal hearing and thereafter, the petitioner appeared before the respondent No.1 and subsequent thereto also filed a representation Annexure-9 dated 19.9.2008 but the same has not yet been considered and decided by the 2 SBCWP NO.5222/2009 respondent No.1. The only grievance of the petitioner is that it was the respondent No.1 who called the petitioner for personal hearing and in pursuance thereof, the petitioner has filed the representation and till now, the respondent No.1 has not heard the petitioner and decided his representation. In my view, when the respondent No.1 has afforded an opportunity of hearing on the representation which is said to have been filed by the petitioner, there can be no reason for keeping the representation pending for such a long period. In the circumstances, therefore, it is appropriate to direct the respondent No.1 to hear the petitioner and decide his representation Annexure-9 dated 19.9.2008 utmost expeditiously in accordance with law. With these observations, the instant writ petition is disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. NK 3 SBCWP NO.5222/2009 S.B.CIVIL MISC.STAY APPLICATION NO.8338/2009 IN S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5222/2009 Date of Order : : 26.05.2009 PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr.Sandeep Pathak, for the petitioner. Since the writ petition itself has been disposed of, the stay petition also stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. NK