vks 1 APPLN 3573 OF 2010.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3573 OF 2010. Ganesh @ Yogesh Kashinath Patil .. Applicant -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. O. A. Siddiqui for the applicant Mr. Y.M. Nakhawa, APP for the respondent State. Mr. A. H. H. Ponda, for respondent No.2-complainant. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3181 OF 2010 Vilas Shravan Patil .. Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. S. V. Kotwal, for the applicant. Mr Y. M.Nakhawa, APP for the respondent State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 7th September, 2010 P.C. 1. These two applications for bail, are filed by five persons who participated in murderous assault which led to death of one Anil Patil. The learned counsel for the applicants, learned APP and learned counsel for the informant on whose report an offence was registered against the applicants have taken me through the vks 2 APPLN 3573 OF 2010.sxw chargesheet. It appears that the applicant Vilas had also filed police complaint alleging that the deceased Anil as well as other persons who have named the applicants had assaulted Vilas and others. 2. Considering the nature of assault which led to death of Anil as also the injuries sustained by Deepak Parshuram Patil, Prakash Parshuram Patil, Dayanand Parshuram Patil, Pravin Parshuram Patil, Kishor Parshuram Patil, it cannot be said that the applicants had not participated in the assault. The eye witnesses named them as participants in the assault though FIR does not attribute any specific role of applicants, i) Sagar Patil, ii)Ganesh Patil, iii) Sandeep Patil and iv) Suhas Patil. 3. As far as Vilas is concerned, there are specific statements that Vilas hit the deceased Anil with hockey stick. 4. Sujit Patil and other co-accused, had applied for bail and their applications came to be rejected by this Court holding that they had participated in the assault. The learned counsel for the applicants may be right in submitting that there cannot be a case of reverse parity and that this Court must apply mind afresh to the claim of applicants for being bailed out. But the nature of assault on the part of applicants leading to death of Anil, clearly points to the possibility of their forming unlawfully assembly with object of doing away with Anil. The nature of injuries observed in the notes of vks 3 APPLN 3573 OF 2010.sxw Postmortem report of Anil show the gravity of assault. In view of this, none of the applicant is entitled to bail. Since chargesheet has already been filed, the learned Trial Judge may put them to a quick trial. 5. Both the applications are rejected. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)