1 WP-6580/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6580 OF 2010 Shri. Mohamad Akram Ansari. ..Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents. Mrs. P.P. Bhosale for the Petitioner. Mr. Suresh Bhosale, AGP. For the Respondent Nos. 2&3. Mr. K.K.Jadhav for the Respondent No.4. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATE : 20th September, 2010. P.C. :- 1 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has raised two contentions in support of the challenge to the order passed in revision application. The first contention is that on the date of publication of the notice, fourth respondent was not registered. The second contention is that the fourth respondent does not hold premises for conducting the fair price shop. 2 The order of the Revisional Authority does not show that the aforesaid contentions were raised by the petitioner at the time of hearing of the revision application. Therefore, a query was made to the learned counsel for the petitioner as to whether it is the case made out in the writ petition that the aforesaid grounds were urged but not decided by the 2 WP-6580/2010 Revisional Authority. After the petition was kept back for some time to enable the learned counsel for the petitioner to go through the petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is unable to point out the said grounds. Thus, the contentions raised in this petition which are contentions based on facts were not agitated before the Revisional Authority. Hence, the petitioner cannot be permitted to agitate the said contentions in the writ petition 3 Hence, no case for interference is made out. Writ petition is rejected. JUDGE