IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4928 of 1998 1. Anil Kumar, son of Sri saryu Prasad 2. Bishnu Prasad, son of Sri Saryu Prasad 3. Sunil Kumar, son of Sri Saryu Prasad 4. Laxman Prasad, son of Sri Saryu Prasad, all residents of Mohalla Nanman Toli, Town/P.S./District- Buxar ------ Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Commissioner of Excise, Bihar, Patna, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna. 3. The Collector, Buxar. 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Excise Bhojpur-cum- Buxar, excise Office, Arrah. ------ Respondents. ------------ 3. 10.11.2010 Heard Mr. Jayanand for the petitioners, and Mr. Satish Kumar Sinha, learned Assistant Counsel to Additional Advocate General No.4 for the respondents. The respondents have placed on record their counter affidavits. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous because the reliefs prayed for by them herein have been departmentally granted. In that view of the matter, as prayed, the writ petition is disposed of as having infructuous. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar,J. ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)