1 C.A.NO.12866/2008. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12866 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO.21327 OF 2008. Kunwardevi W/o Shyamlal Rathor – Died-L.Rs. Omprakash S/o Shaymlal Rathor ...Applicant. VERSUS 1. Balwantrao S/o Govindrao Deshpande-Died-L.Rs. 1-A) Padmavati W/o Balwant Deshpande and others. ...Respondents. ... Mr.S.V.Natu, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr.A.B.Kharosekar, Advocate, for the respondent No.1-B. Mr.U.B.Bilolikar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 3,6,7 and 8. Smt.Maya R.Jamdhade, Advocate for respondent No. 4. ... CORAM: A.V.NIRGUDE,J. Date : 7th August, 2009. COURT’S ORDER: 1. The respondents have not filed any reply to oppose the application. Reason mentioned in the 2 C.A.NO.12866/2008. application as to why the delay was caused is quite convincing. The delay is condoned. The application stands allowed. Rule is made absolute. (A.V.NIRGUDE,J.) lkp