IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3397 of 2011 ASHOK T.T. @ ASHOK PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 16.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and it appears from perusal of the impugned order of learned Sessions Judge that the name of this petitioner came during course of investigation in the statement of some witnesses. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid witnesses are only hearsay witnesses and moreover, they did not disclose the name of petitioner before the informant at the time of lodging the present case. She further submits that except confessional statement of co-accused Mantu Manjhi, there is nothing against the petitioner. Taking into consideration the above stated facts as well as circumstances of the case, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 566 of 2010. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)