R.F.A. No. 469 of 1998 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. R.F.A. No. 469 of 1998 (O&M) Date of decision : 10.11.2010 Dev Narain and another .... Appellants vs State of Haryana and others .... Respondents Coram : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Sudhir K. Hooda, Mr. Amit Jain, Mr. M. L. Sharma, and Ms. Shriya Chahar Panjeta, Advocates, for the landowners. Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. RAJESH BINDAL, J This order will dispose of the RFA Nos. 474, 1272, 1304, 1540, 2871 of 1994, 204 and 1235 of 1995, 216 and 1229 of 1996, 469, 710 to 712, 769 and 2245 of 1998, as the same arise out of common acquisition. The landowners have filed appeals seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. The facts have been extracted from RFA No. 469 of 1998. Briefly, the facts are that State of Haryana, vide notification dated 26.12.1988, issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, `the Act'), acquired land situated within the revenue estate of village Bohar, Hadbast No. 68, District Rohtak, for development and utilisation thereof as residential and commercial area in Sector-3, Rohtak. The same was followed by notification under Section 6 of the Act dated 22.12.1989. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, “the Collector”), determined the market value of the acquired land @ ` 64,000/- per acre forming part of rectangle nos. 100, 101, 120, 130 to 132, ` 30/- per square yard for rectangle nos. 134 to 139, and ` 50/- per square yard for rectangle nos. 162 to 167. Aggrieved against the same, the land owners filed objections which were referred to the learned Additional District Judge, Rohtak, who keeping in view the material placed on record by the parties, assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ` 75,000/- per acre forming part of rectangle nos. 100, 101, 129 to 132, ` 35/- per square yard for land forming part of rectangle nos. 134 to 139, and ` 50/- per square yard forming part of rectangle nos. 162 to 167. The learned court below had dismissed the references subject matter in RFA Nos. 474 of 1994 and 1229 of 1996. R.F.A. No. 469 of 1998 (2) Learned counsel for the parties submitted that the issues raised in the present set of appeals are squarely covered by judgment of this court in RFA No. 3497 of 1993 Parchare vs Haryana State and another, decided on 5.11.2009. Accordingly, for the reasons mentioned in Parchare's case, the present set of appeals are disposed on in the same terms. 10.11.2010. (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge