^f HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISOARH AT BILASPUR APPBLLANTS Respondents {In first appeal) Plaintiffs Second Appeal 182/2006 1. Teej Kuriwar Bai, aged about 45 years, widow Genda Das. Rahas Bai, aged 25 years, D/o Grenda Das Taraaiati aged 25 years, W/o Saatosh Satoaaoii. Sharda Bai, aged 15 years, D/o Genda Das Satnami, (Miaor) Through her mother Teej Kunwar Bai. AppeUant 1 to 4 are R/o Shakti Ward, Kawardha, Tah. & Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.). Pnya Bai, aged 24 years, W/o Lal Sataami, R/o Pandana, Talx. Paadaria, Distt. Kabirdliam, Raj kuiaar, S/o Genda Das, aged 22 years, R/o Shakti Waid, Kawardha, Tah. & Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.). RBSPONDENTS Appellaxits (In first appeal) Defendants VERSU8 1. Lakhaa Satnami, S/o Rameshwar Sataaim, aged 42 years, Occupation Cultivation, R/o Shakti Ward Kawardha, Distt. Kabmltiam (C.G,). Mohinee Bai, Widow, Rameshwar, aged 70 years, R/o Shakti Ward, Kawaidha, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.). 3. Durga Bai, widow-Sarju Sataaini, aged 32 years, Occupation-Labourer, R/o Shakti Waid Kawardha, Tah. & Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.). SECOND APPEAL U/S 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCBDURE. (SB :Hon*ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate for fhe appeUaats. Shri Anaad Gupta, Advocate for fhe respondents No. 1 & 2. ORAL- JUDGBMENT (Passedon 10/11/2010) 1. Heaid. .:^c .,-^^ 11 '^ff^'^l9 ^^z^^ -^- <^ 3. 4, Learaed counsel for tiie appellaiits Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, aad learaed counsel for fhe respondents No. 1 & 2 Shri Anand Gupta, submits fhat bofh fhe parties have entered into comproniise. They have also filed I,A, No. 01 compromise document dated 12/4/ 10 ia witch detail of coiaproxnise has been inentioned aad on account of compromise bofh fhe pardes want to wifhdraw this second appeal. Prayer is aUowed. Consequentiy, fhis second appeal is dismissed as withdraw?on the basis ofconipromdise dated 12/4/10 which Qnds part ofthis record. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge