IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 17985 of 2005 Date: 20.08.2005 Between: Makireddy Nookaraju S/o. Appanna R/o. Kindra Village, Rajavommangi (M), E.G. District, PETITIONER Vs. The Additional Agent to the Government, E.G. District at Rampachodavaram, and others. RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 17985 of 2005 ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the inaction of the fifth respondent in passing orders on the stay petition, pending disposal of the revision filed by him. 2. It is stated that the petitioner is the owner and possessor of an extent of Ac.4.84 cents of land in Survey No.150/1 situated at Kindra Village, Rajavommangi Mandal, East Godavari District. It is also stated that the second respondent initiated proceedings against him under the A.P. Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation 1/1959 in L.T.R.P.No.88/2004, and after conducting necessary enquiry passed an order of ejectment of the petitioner from the land in question, on the ground that the petitioner, being a non-tribal, is in possession of the land in scheduled area. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner filed an appeal before the first respondent in C.M.A.No.27 of 2005. The petitioner was not successful even before the appellate authority. Hence, filed a revision before the fifth respondent on 27.07.2005 and also sought for stay of eviction pending disposal of the revision. But, however, the fifth respondent did not pass any orders so far. Hence, the petitioner has come up with the present writ petition. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare. 4. In view of the pendency of the revision before the fifth respondent, the writ petition is disposed of directing the fifth respondent to dispose of the revision expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Pending disposal of the revision by the fifth respondent, the respondents are directed not to evict the petitioner from the land in question. 5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ___________________ S. Ananda Reddy, J Date: 20.08.2005 va