CWP No.1325/2008. 01.09.2008 Present: Mr M.L.Brakta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.R.K.Bawa, Advocate General with Mr.J.K.Verma, Deputy A.G., for respondents No.1 to 4. This writ petition is directed against the judgment passed by the Election Tribunal setting aside the election of the petitioner who contested election of village Pradhan. The main ground on which the election has been set aside is encroachment by husband of the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in fact this land was of petitioner’s father-in-law and not of the petitioner’s husband and further it has been contended that they are living separate as is evident from the Parivar Register. We find that the petitioner’s husband moved an application contained in Annexure P-4 which indicate that the petitioner’s husband moved application for regularization of the encroached land in dispute wherein it has not been referred that this land belongs to his father which goes to show that the petitioner’s husband had encroached the land in question. The encroached land has been shown in Proforma-A contained in Annexure P-4 by which the petitioner’s husband moved for regularization to be of year 1980. The said application of course was moved on 14.8.2002 but the Parivar Register which is being relied upon is of 2008, therefore, we do not find any illegality or arbitrariness in the order passed by the Election Tribunal. …2… In light of the above, no interference is warranted and the writ petition is dismissed, so also the pending application. ( Jagdish Bhalla ), C.J. September 1, 2008. ( Kuldip Singh ), J. (soni)