IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.16 of 2008 KAILASH CHANDRA MISHRA S/O LATE GANESH MISHRA. --- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAM CHANDRA SAH 3. LAKSHMAN SAH BOTH SONS OF SRI RAJ KISHORE SAH 4. SATYENDRA MANJHI SON OF SRI BADRI MANJHI 5. BAIJNATH MANJHI 6. BADRI MANJHI BOTH SONS OF LATE RUPAM MANJHI 7. PRAYAG SAH SON OF LATE RAGHU SAH 8. ARUN KUMAR SAH 9. ANIL KUMAR SAH BOTH SONS OF SRI PRAYAG SAH --- OPP. PARTIES. ----------- 03 01.09.2010 Heard both sides. This is an application filed by the informant/petitioner against the judgment and order of acquittal passed by learned trial Court in Tr. No. 860 of 2007, whereby the accuseds ( opposite party nos. 2 to 9 herein have been let off under Sections 144 and 379 of the Penal Code. I have minutely gone through the order impugned, particularly paragraph no. 8 of the order impugned. This Court does not find any patent illegality in the consideration of the matter by learned trial Court meriting interference. The application has no merit. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)