1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.8589 of 2011 K.K.Ramesh ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Home Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi. 2. The Home Secretary, (Home Department), Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai. 3. The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu,Chennai. 4. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City,Madurai. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 19.07.2011 and direct to give police protection to him and his family members and not to foist false case and not to harass the petitioner in any manner by Tamil Nadu Police. For Petitioner ... Mr.R.Ramachandran For R.1 ... Mr.K.K.Senthilvelan, Central Govt.Standing Counsel For R.2 to R.4 ... Mr.M.Govindan Special Government Pleader ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 19.07.2011 and direct the respondent to give police protection to him and his family members and not to foist false case and not to harass the petitioner in any manner by Tamil Nadu Police. 2. Heard Mr.R.Ramachandran, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr.K.K.Senthilvelan, learned counsel for the first respondent and Mr.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader who takes notice for the respondents 2 to 4. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. The petitioner has given a representation to the respondents on 19.07.2011. Since the said representation has not been considered so far, the writ petition has been filed by the petitioner. 5. The learned Counsel for the respondents states that the authority will consider the representation of the petitioner on its own merits and in accordance with law. 6. Without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the third respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 19.07.2011 on its own merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's case and the authority shall consider the same on its own merits. 7. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Consequently the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No Costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Home Secretary,Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India,New Delhi. 2. The Home Secretary,(Home Department), Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai. 3. The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu,Chennai. 4. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City,Madurai. +2ccs to Mr.R.Ramachandran, Advocate SR.No.31732 W.P.(MD)No.8589 of 2011 15.09.2011 ps PA/22.09.2011/2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/