((-1-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.181 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.8 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.182 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.183 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.184 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.185 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.186 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.187 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.188 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.189 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.190 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.191 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.192 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.193 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.194 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.195 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.196 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.197 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.198 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.199 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.200 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.201 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.202 OF 2009 ((-2-)) Ashwin Negandhi Petitioner versus M/s.D.G.Flooring Systems & anr. Respondents None for the petitioner. S.R.Borulkar, P.P. for the State. Ramesh Tripathi i/by Avinash C. Negandhi for respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 28th April 2009 PC : 1. Learned counsel for the applicant himself states that though there is no urgency, production of papers is obtained. The prayer in these applicants is for fixing an early date of hearing of revision applications of the year 2009. Very old revision applications from the year 1999 are pending in this Court. Hence, as of today no case is made out for giving priority to the revision applications. The applications are rejected. (A.S.OKA, J.)