IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17457 of 2010 SANJAY CHAUHAN . Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR . ----------- 2/ 14/6/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Considering the nature of allegations against the petitioner husband under Section-498A of Indian Penal Code for having married the complainant concealing his subsisting earlier marriage to another this Court is not persuaded to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail. The contention that he was still willing for revival of matrimonial harmony with his second wife/complainant is a matter to be more appropriately considered in regular bail without being prejudiced by the present order. The application is rejected. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)