IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 22328 of 2010 Date of Decision: 15.12.2010. Dilawar and others --Petitioners Versus H.U.D.A & others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the petitioners. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. Siddharth Batra, Advocate present in the Court has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The land of the petitioners measuring 5 kanals 3 marlas situated in the revenue estate of village Taraf Afgan, Tehsil & District Panipat was acquired for development of Sector 24, Panipat. Under the various policies issued by the respondents from time to time the land owners whose land is acquired for public purpose are allotted plots residential/commercial in the sectors where the acquired land is utilized or in the adjoining sectors. The petitioner has placed on record various policies (Annexures P-1 to P-3). Father of the petitioners applied for allotment of 1 kanal of plot under the oustees quota and also deposited the earnest money of Rs. 1,18,100/- vide application No.39328. However, this amount has been refunded vide refund order dated 3.9.2008. After the death of their father petitioners again made CWP. No. 22328 of 2010 -2- an application for allotment of the plot under the oustees quota and again deposited the amount vide letter dated 22.10.2008. Petitioners also made a representation dated 8.2.2010 (Annexure P-6). The short grievance of the petitioners is that their claim for allotment of plot under the oustees quota has not been considered nor their representation has been decided till date. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take decision on the representation of the petitioners for allotment of the plot under oustees quota, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioners is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 15.12.2010. lucky