; Ga) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH / X y WRIT PETITION NOIZé$ OF 2005 ETITIONERA “(f/ ['Chandrabhan Pandey, S/o Shri V.» a” Ramnaresh Pandey, Aged about 5o years, Presently working as 1Q; .p' Head Constable (B.No. 100), Posted at Thana Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh). Versus Union of India the Through Secretary, Department of Personnel, Public Grievance and Pension, Third Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi. State of Madhya Pradesh Through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.). State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Director General of Police, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.). Inspector General of Police (Personnel), Police Head Quarters, 'Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.).‘ Superintendent of Police, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). P ‘ @ \m WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA H§$H S€§URT “QF QHHATT5$GARH AT 5§LHA$PUR 3f $INGLE BENCE : HON’BLE MR. $£§T§SH K. iAGNEHCTRl? J. WWT PETI?IGN NDA26§ QF 289$ Peiitioner : Chandrabhan Pandey Vef$US Reagaondents : Umon of Sndia and others Pres_ent : Mr. Sameer Bahar, counsel foa’ the petitimer. Mr. Bhi5hma Kinger, Standing Counse! for mspondent No.1iUnion of §ndia. Mr. V.V.S.Moorthy. Deputy Ac§vocate Genera! wiih Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Gcvemment Aclvocate for respondents No.3 to 6. None appears f0: respondent No2. @RDER {Passed on 1.5%ef Gctober, 200$) The case o§ the petitioner is thai the petiticnet waa emptoyed as Head Constabie by undivided State of Madhya R’adesh. On creation sf new State of Chhattisgarh, the petitioner was aiiocated to $tate of Madhya Pradesn by order dated 7-3-2003 (Annexure P-t) passed by the Petice Headquatters. Madhya Prades‘n,’ Bhopai. Assistant inspectot Generat of Pciice (Persennel), Poliee Headquarters, Raipur fer Directdr Generai of Petice issued a eircuiar dated 9-12-2m3 (Annexure P-2) tc alt the Senior Superintendents of Pctice and Superintendents of Police to relieve the Constabiesli—iead Constabies, who have been aiiocated to State of Madhya Ptadesh. Notwithstanding the orders dated 7—3-2093 (Annexui'e P-t) and 9422003 (Annexure P- w? N: 2), 2he petitioner has not been reiieved fram ihe presen‘: piace of posting at Rajnandgaan tii! date. 2 . ii is jointiy admitied by fhe teamed ceunsei appearing far the parties that the ordws dated 7-3‘2003 (Amexure PA) and 9-12« 2003 (Annexure P—2) are very dear and c§o mt adm§i 9f any confusion. 3. Accordingly, respondents No.3 to 8 are direcied to reiieve the petitionei forthwith for joining his new piece of aiiocaiion at Rewa (Madhya Pradesh). 4. For the reasons aforesiaied and as a resuit, this peiition stands aiiowed. No order as io costs. Certified copy as per ruies. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gopai