IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41668 of 2009 BIJAY SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----- 2/ 10.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Informant begins to make the allegation indicating about false allegation as either there was claim of both the parties over the pond and its fisheries or accused persons had no concern with the pond and only they appeared to kidnap informant’s men for fish and its net but claim of parties over the pond is shown. Alleged persons appeared soon after the incident for fishery though making several allegations but keeping in view the differences rather litigation for right to possess the pond or right of fishery, rejection of petitioner’s anticipatory bail is not justified. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Naugachiya (Kharik) P.S. Case No. 217 of 1999, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Naugachiya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)