1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 1355 OF 2010 Ratan Dattaram Kale and another ... PETITIONERS V E R S U S Sadashiv Nagoji Kale and others ... RESPONDENTS ... Mr.Amol Gandhi ,Advocate for Petitioners ... CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR, J. DATE : 26TH APRIL, 2010. PER COURT : 1] Heard Counsel. 2] The Respondent No.1 filed suit (Regular Civil Suit NO. 20 of 2006) for setting aside the compromise decree rendered in another suit bearing Regular Civil Suit NO. 198 of 2004. He also sought declaration and injunction. In the suit filed by him, he applied for addition of two sisters i.e. respondent Nos. 3 and 4 as parties. The trial Court allowed the application and they arrayed them. The contention of the petitioners is that, though sisters are not necessary parties and initial effect in order to protract hearing of the suit. 3] It is well settled that the plaintiff is dominus lites, the plaintiff is at liberty to add or subtract the parties if so 2 required. A prayer can be rejected only when it is found that intention of the plaintiff is to achieve some unlawful object. Addition of the real sister can not be regards as illegal or unlawful object. The petitioners are original defendants and can not object impugned order when it does not adversely affect them. Dismissed. Sd/- ( V.R.KINGAONKAR, J. ) MTK