IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 20610 of 2006 Between: Anil Kuma rVerma S/o J.D. Verma Deputy Commandant (FIre), CISF, FSTI Hyderabad R/o Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Unionof India, repby The Director (Personnel) Ministry of Home Affairs, North Block, New Delhi 110 001 2 The Director General, Central Industrial Security Force, Head Quarter No. 13, C.G.O's Complex, Lodhi Road New Delhi- 110 003. 3 Sri K.D. Dhankar, Deputy Inspector General Central Industrial Security Force, CISF Unit, CCL, Kargali, (Under Orders of Transfer and posting as Deputy Inspector, General Fire Sercie, Training Institute in the Campus of National Industrial Security Academy, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned Fax Message No. E- 38013/12/DIG. 2004/PERS. 1/06, dated 25-9-2006 issued by the 2nd respondent and posting the 3rd respondent in the cadre of deputy Inspector General at Fire Service Training Institute in he Campus of National Industrial Security Academy, Hyderabad, with eﬀect from 1-10- 2006, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, contrary to Central Industrial Security Force Rules, 2001, other statutory Rules, and unconstitutional by holding that there is no 2nd post a voilable in the cadre of Deputy Inspector General (FIre), located at Fire Service Training Institute in the campus of NISA, Hyderabad for posting the 3rd respondent and further the 3rd respondent is not eligible and qualiﬁed for his posting as Deputy Inspector General (Fire), since he is in the promoted cadre of Deputy Inspector General, Executive Branch and not having the requisite educational and experience qualiﬁcations even for his posting on deputation or for short terms contract; and pass such other and further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.SURYA KARAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication and it has become infructuous. Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. __________ 11-09-2008 rkk