J IN THE_HIG_H_C_OURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 5A5P_0_F_20Q6 PETmONER: R.P. Shukla, S/o- Late Shri Ramapati Shukla , About- 41 Years, Occupation- Chief Executive Officer (Suspended) Janpad Panchayat Patthalgaon, R/o- Block Colony Patthalgaon, Distt.Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT (S): \^-"^/v-' ^•'^"/-^ '--••"'•A.-;" ..•*'' €^^' 1 ;• ^\ V."'' 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through it's Secretary Department of Adim Jati Anusuchit Jati Vikas , D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) XNk\^ •/ .-c/l.\..'./•• c^-y ^y ^ OMfr 2. Joint Secretaiy Department of Adim Jati Anusuchit Jati Vikas , D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 3. Under Secretary Department of Adim Jati Anusuchit Jati Vikas , D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 4. Collector ^ Distt.Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS / CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION / ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE. "»».. mOH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISOARH : BILASPUR SmGLBBBNCH : HON'BLB! 8HM 8ATISH K. AOIUHOTRI, J. WRIT PSnTION SO. 22SO OP 2006 Petitioncr Rcspondents versus R.P. ShuMa State ofCUhattisgarh and ofhers Present : Shri Vinay Randey, counsel for fhc petitioner. ORALORDBR (3'a May, 2006) 1. This petition challenges the order dated 12/19.4.2006 (Annexure P/8) ia Appcal No. F 2-28/2005/25-3 passed by the Secretaiy, Goveniment of Chhattisgarh, Schediiled Caste and Schediited Tribe Wclfare Department asaia.at the order dated 20.9.2005, whereby the petitioner was placed under suspensioa. 2. Leamed counsd appearing for fhe petitioner submits that the appeUate authority has not considered all the submissions and facts aad circumstances of the case, while disinissiag the appeaL Be fhat as it may, the suspension is not a peiialty in nature. The suspension oider was passed, pending the enquuy against fhe petitioner. 3. Having regard to the facts aud circuiastances of the case, it is not desirable to interferencc at this st^;e, whea fhe departiaeatal enquuy is pending ayBdnst fbe petitioner. 4. The petition is accordiagty dismissed. However, the enquiry oflBccr is directed to coinplete the departincntal enquuy as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a pcriod of three inonfhs. The observations inade by the appellate authority ia order dated 12/19.4.2006 wiB not come in t3h:e way of fhe departmental enquiiy and fhe enquny ofiBcer is expected to conduct the departmental enquuy fairly, honestty and objectivcly, without bemg influenced by aay ofthe observations made by fhc appeUate aufhorily. Sd/- SatishK. Agnihol Judse Bablu f\J--\ (S