IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41441 of 2010 NAZIR ANSARI , SON OF LATE HANIF ANSARI, R/O VILLAGE- BAROKHAR, P.S. HASPURA, DISTT- AURANGABAD………………………………………..PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR…………………………………… OPP. PARTY With Cr.Misc. No.39207 of 2010 QAYUM ANSARI, SON OF RAHMAN MIAYAN ( MOHRU), R/O VILLAGE- BAGEKHER, P.S. HUSPURA, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD…………………………………. PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR………………………………. OPP. PARTY ----------- 2 26-3-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State in both the applications which arise out of same criminal case under section 304 (B) and 201/34 of the I.P.C. Considering the prosecution case and the relationship of the petitioner Qayum Ansari ( Cr.Misc. No. 39207/2010) with the husband of the victim lady, the prayer for anticipatory bail of Qayum Ansari, who is father-in-law of the victim lady is rejected. This order shall not prejudice the case of petitioner, Qayum ansari, if he surrenders and seeks regular bail. The other petitioner Nazir Ansari ( Cr.Misc. No. 2 41441/ 2010) is described in the F.I.R. as “ Fuffa” of the husband of the victim lady. Considering the submission that he cannot have any interest in demand of dowry and torturing of the victim lady, his prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks, petitioner Nazir Ansari shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the trial court i.e. the court of the S.D.J.M. Daud Nagar in connection with Haspura P.S.Case No. 17/10, subject to the conditions laid down under sections 438(2) Cr.P.C. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)