1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.8176 OF 2005 Jagdishkumar Lalluramji Rawal ..Aplicant Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.A.A.Jambetkar for applicant Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 20th December 2005. P.C. . Applicant is arrayed as accused in C.R.No.26 of 2005. Offences alleged are punishable under section 411 of I.P.C. Applicant was arrested on 27th November 2005 and was remanded to police custody till 3rd December 2005. Thereafter, he has been remanded to judicial custody. After having perused the annexures to this application, the only 2 allegation as far as this applicant is that he assisted Suresh Raval in disposing of jewellery articles which have been removed from factory premises. In fact, the applicant is brother of Suresh. In my view, once bail application of Kantilal Patel is granted, this applicant deserves same treatment, more so, considering his limited role. Hence, following order. i) Applicant shall be released on bail in connection with C.R.No.26 of 2005 registered with Jogeshwari Police Station in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one local surety in the like amount. ii) Applicant shall attend Jogeshwari Police Station once a fortnight. iii) Bail is granted subject to condition that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any 3 inducement or threat to any prosecution witnesses and shall not in any manner tamper with prosecution evidence. iv) Applicant shall cooperate with the learned trial Judge for expeditious disposal of the trial. Any attempt by the applicant to delay the trial may be a ground for cancellation of bail. v) Any observation made in this order shall not be construed as any finding or any expression of opinion on the merits of the case at the time of trial. vi) Application disposed of in above terms. vii) Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order. 4 (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)