IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20842 of 2010 1. AMRIK RAI 2. CHANARIK RAI BOTH SONS OF SRI DILKESWAR RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 379, 307, 302, 385 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. By an order dated 16.2.2010, the petitioner was refused bail vide Cr. Misc. 4238 of 2010 but with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It has been submitted that the charge has been framed on 13.5.2010. In view of such, let the petitioners above named, who are in custody since 20.10.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-III, Barh, in Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 140 of 2001 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and the other shall be the father of the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii)That the 2 bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)