IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15794 of 2011 Swarnjit Kumar Sonu Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 22.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 129 of 2009 registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The name of the petitioner sprang up on confessional statement of co-accused Binod Kumar Mahto. It appears that the charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. Since other accused Anil Kumar Singh has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 14453 of 2010 by this Court and it is submitted that Binod Kumar Mahto has been granted bail by the learned court below, I see no reason for the learned court below not to give the same privilege to the petitioner and try to dispose off the regular bail application of the petitioner if possible on the same day, if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular 2 bail within six weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned C.J.M., Rosera at Samastipur in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 129 of 2009 at the cost of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)