IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.821 of 2007 SONAPATI KUWAR @ SONAPATI KUAR @ SONO PANDIT, R/o Village – Rukunpura Tola of Jaitipur Kurua, P.S. – Ghoshi, Distt. – Jehanabad …………..…. Principal Defendant / Petitioner Versus 1. KAMDEO RAM, S/o Fagu Ram, R/o Village – Rukunpura, P.S. Ghoshi, Distt. – Jehanabad, 2. Barishankar Ram, 3. Janardan Ram, both sons of Rambalak Ram, R/o Vill. – Parthu, P.S.- Akangersarai, Distt. – Nalanda …Defendant / Opposite Party 1st Set, 4. Ram Prit Ram, S/o Late Sudama Ram, 5. Tapeshwar Ram, S/o Late Ramsevak Ram, 6. Bhagwat Ram, 7. Sheoujan Ram, 8. Ram Ratan Ram, O.P. Nos. 6, 7 & 8 are sons of Tapeshwar Ram and all are residents of Rukunpura, P.S. Choshi District Jehanabad …………………………….. Plaintiffs / Opposite Parties II nd Set. ----------- 3. 30.11.2009. This Civil Revision is time barred. I.A. No. 2521/2007 has been filed by the petitioner for condoning the delay of 4 days in filing of this revision application, which was earlier ordered to be considered at the time of admission. No body appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the interlocutory application as well as this Civil Revision application. The application for condoning the delay in filing this Civil Revision (I.A. No. 2521/2007) is, thus, dismissed for want of prosecution and in consequence 2 thereof this Civil Revision is also dismissed for being time barred. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )