IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5893 of 2010 LALLAN PASWAN, SON OF LATE MARAYADA PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17/02/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 324, 326, 380, 427, 307, 302 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act, Sections 3, 4, 5 of the Explosive Substance Act and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act. On the last occasion, by an order dated 8.1.2010, the petitioner was refused bail on account of his absconding for a long period but a liberty was given to him to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It appears that now the charges have already been framed on 9.3.2009. In view of the above mentioned facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Kaimur at Bhabua, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 72 of 2008 arising out of Chainpur P.S. Case 84 of 1998 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that 2 he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)