r .\^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR FA(M)No._^J_/20 • • 3 ^<;a§^1 iWt Appellant / icant ^^ '.1^^^ \.-e'^ ^ t'X-V' ft.^-"'^'^' ^* - - jA ^" R^&pondent/ lon - Applicant ^Sandip Tiwari,' 39 Yrs. S/o Kaushalendra Tiwari, R/o Badnawar Distt. Dhar Presentlv At: 5, Shantikunj Scheme No. 64, Oppo. Bombay Hospital, Indore VERSUS ^efmeta Tiwari, 33 Yrs. j^/o Sandip Tiwari/ R/o Badnawar Presently At: Ganeshram Nagar, Patni Building Malviya Nagar, Raipur APPEAL UNDER SEC. 19 OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, 1984. -l- -f HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISOARH. BILASPUR CORAM: Hon'ble Shrl APPELLANT ^l Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, J, SandipTiwari. Versus Shweta Thvari. APPEAL UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT. 1984 None for the appellant. ORAL ORDER (12/01/2011) Following oral order of the Court was passed by Quddusi. J. List is being revised. Case called out twice. (2) Shri Raja Sharma, learned counset for the appellant has stated that he has no instruction in the matter and he would not plead the case of the appetlant. (3) No one is present for the respondent and no other person has put in appearance for the appetlant also. Therefore, in the circumstances we hsve no other option but to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution. (4) The appeal is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- I.M.Quddussi Judge Sd/- prss'nantKumarMishra Judge m •Y