1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.11.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.BASHA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petition (MD)No.12695 of 2011 S.Rajini ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Pudukkottai. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Pudukkottai. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukkottai. 4.The Thasildar, Taluk Office, Kandarvakkottai, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of mandamus directing the third and fourth respondents to take appropriate action regarding the removal of encroachment in survey No.56 of Pisanathur Village, Kandarvakkottai Taluk, Pudukkottai District and pass such further or other orders. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Baalasundharam For Respondents : Mr.V.Pandi, Government Advocate O R D E R [Order of the Court was made BY K.N.BASHA, J] Mr.V.Pandi, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for Respondents 1 to 4. By mutual consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing at the time of admission itself. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2.The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition seeking for a direction to the third and fourth respondents to take appropriate action regarding the removal of encroachment in survey No.56 of Pisanathur Village, Kandarvakkottai Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though the petitioner has come forward with this writ petition with a larger prayer, the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is given to the 3rd and 4th respondents to consider his representation dated 07.10.2011 within a time frame. 4.Heard the learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is given to the 3rd and 4th respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the representation of the petitioner, is constrained to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 07.10.2011, by affording an opportunity to the petitioner as well as to other relevant parties and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall furnish a copy of his representation, dated 07.10.2011, along with a copy of this order, to the 3rd and 4th respondents, within ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. 6.With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To: 1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Pudukkottai. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Pudukkottai. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukkottai. 4.The Thasildar, Taluk Office, Kandarvakkottai, Pudukkottai District +One cc to Mr.K.Baalsundharam, Advocate, SR.No.38873 gb rl/6c – 16.11.2011 ORDER IN WP(MD)No.12695 of 2011 Dated:09.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/