IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 324 of 2009 Rasheed Ahmad @ Jakku and others ……….. Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ………. Respondents Mr. S.K. Agarwal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. S.S. Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. PUjari, Addl. G.A. for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. J.S. Virk, Advocate for respondent No.4. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. S.K. Agarwal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. S.S. Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. PUjari, Addl. G.A. for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. J.S. Virk, Advocate for respondent No.4. 2. After due consideration of the submission of the learned counsel for the parties; contents of the F.I.R.; and averments made in the petition, I do not find that the petitioners entitled to get the reliefs claimed in the writ petition. 3. I am refraining form commenting on the merits of the case lest it may adversely affect the petitioner’s case at the trial, which is yet to start. 4. However, keeping in view of the fact that there is a cross case and both the parties have sustained the injuries, it is directed that if the petitioners move bail applications before the court concerned, their bail applications shall be disposed of expeditiously without waste of time. 5. The writ petition, therefore, fails and is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed in summarily. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 22.04.2009 Shiv