Si IN THE HIGH_CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIONfSl No.6^?,^ OF 2011. PETITIONERfS) ./"Shailesh Kumar Baghel S/o Shri Samarjit Singh Baghel Aged about 39 years, Occupation : Forest Range Officer, R/o At present - Forest Colony, Pithora, Tahsil: Pithora, Distt. Mahasumand (CG) Versus RESPONDENTS ^A^y- ^y ^,/^^ .<^A!7/\y ^/^l// /y / ii^ / ^*^ / ^- t^- /^^y\ •' 1 ^. A 1.' State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department of Forest D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Department of Forest, P.C.C.R. Office, Aranya Bhawan, Jail Road, Raipur (CG) 3. Conservator of Forest, Forest Conservancy, Raipur, C.F. Office, Jail Road, Raipur (CG) f-' t. Divisional Forest Officer Forest Division, Mahasamund, D.F.O. Office, Mahasamund (CG) 5. Sub-Divisional Officer Forest Forest Department Pithora Sub-Division, Pithora, Distt. Mahasaund 6. Shri B.R. Khunte, At present Range Forest Officer, Dalli Rajhara, Durg Forest Division, Durg (CG) WRIT PETITOIN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TH^CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ..•,-s-saES;aifc- i'-/ ,;i"~u"'"y> ^ ^-1!^' ./ R£:TITirt-MG2? r'c. i l! i\-/i'ts£ RESPONDENTS HtGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUR WRIT PETiTlON {S) No. 4687 OF 2011 >hailesh Kumar Baahei V SfSUS State of Chhattisaar'r (Writ Petit'on under Articie 22S of the Constitution of ln< Single Bsnch : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri P.S.Koshy, Advocate for the petitloner. iri Ajit Singh, Panei Lawyer for the State. Shri ORDER (ORAL) ^P?a-=:-=^ ^^ ihi^ H7" fi??v f^f c^' e,r. 2011'! 1 ^'~' ' " v^-- Learned counse! appesring for the petitioner submits that ths petitioner u/as appQintsd as Obsep.'sr for conducting the work of Census 2011 vtde order dated 01.08.2011 (Annexure P/2). Thereafter, bv order dated 10.08.2011 (Annexure P/S), ths petitloner, working as Forest Rangs Officer, has besn transferred from Pithora, Forest Division Mahasarnund to Taurenga Production, Forest Division Udanti. The ouestion asto whether an emplovee engaged in Census may be transferrsd before comoletion of Csnsus work. came into consideration before this Court in Chandrika Prasaa Sinha v. State of Chhattisgarh and other connected matiers. This Court, having considsrsd ail the aspects of the matter, heid that an employee engaged in ihe Census may not be disturbed prior to its eompletion. Accordingiy, the writ petition flied by sevsrai emptoyees 'A'as atlov/ed. Shri Koshy, iearned counsei for the petitioner sybfnlts that the issue Invoived hersin is sauareiy covered -.1,; ascssion ot f.is C-ourt in tiis atorestatsd case. Shri Singh, Searned Panel Lawver aDpearina for the State/ respondents submits that there Is no dispute with regard to the above stated submission and ss sucn, the '»vritDetition mav be disposed of accordingiy. Having regard to the fact situacon of the cass, the impugned order dsfsd 10.08.2011 (Annexur®PlSi in resoect of the DQtitioner is quashed ^ ^f%~ ?^:y.f^f~v^/^-.^ ^1'^^:^ ^*^^!l ^n\^'^)l^'S^.>'^-^ ?' 'f*^^S\3 y^.^> v<i,^w^s »^t •<'5^ <?'^.^L ffb'^5^^.f"k. ?tl!<S?*k.^ 7U 5HQ ii iS uiFSClSQ inSI Xf1^3 pe'CiIiOHd' sTISy COHisHUS S^l IHS 5aH1S p^SCS USl U WOFK of Csnsus s CQmplQts, Accordinciiv, the writ isetition is diSDosed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- SATISH K. ANGNIHORI Judge 1 W.P.(S) No.3444of2010, decidea on 05.10.2010