FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CA/11142/2010 NIRAJ V/S CIDCO 1. Heard Shri Darshan D.Kulkarni, learned Advocate h/f Shri Amol M.Awate, Advocate for the applicant and Shri Ram Shinde, learned Advocate h/f Shri A.S.Bajaj, learned Advocate for respondents 1 & 2. 2. By this application, the applicant seeks restoration of the Writ Petition No.2580 of 2007, which was dismissed in default on 15.6.2010. 3. It appears from the contentions raised in the Civil Application that due to inadvertence of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition remained to be attended, resulting into its dismissal. We have perused the order dated 15.6.2010 passed by this Court, which reflects that learned counsel for the petitioner remained absent on the last date so also on 15.6.2010 i.e. on the date of dismissal of the Writ Petition, in default. 4. Considering the contentions raised in the application so also submissions advanced, we are of the view that the present application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice so that the petitioner can avail an opportunity to contest the same on its own merits. 5. In the result, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). Order dated 15.6.2010 stands recalled. Writ Petition stands restored to file at its original stage. No order as to costs. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.) Dt.8.10.2010 akl