1 ca 722.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 722 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2441 OF 2009 1. Rekha Wd/o Madhukar Bharaskar and others .. Applicants Versus 1. The New India Insurance Co. Ltd. and others .. Respondents Shri Sachin Deshmukh, Advocate for Applicants. Shri V. R. Mundada, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 27TH JULY, 2012. PER COURT : . Motion is made for speaking to minutes in the nature of modification. Shri Deshmukh, the learned counsel submits that in the order dated 15th September, 2011 more particularly in para 4 the condition of furnishing surety to the satisfaction of the Registrar is stated, instead the applicants would submit the solvent security. 2 ca 722.10 2. Shri Mundada, the learned counsel opposes the same. 3. Even solvent security would be a sufficient security to protect the interest of the Insurance Company. In view of that in line No. 4 of para 4 of the order dated 15.09.2011 instead word 'surety', the same shall be read as "solvent security". [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/July 12