IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.145 of 2007 MOSTT. MANDAVI KUNWAR @ MANDAVI & ANR. Versus RAM KRISHAN PRASAD & ORS. ----------- 03/ 02.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. This petition has been filed by the interveners-petitioners challenging order dated 11.10.2006 by which the learned Munsif-II, Ara rejected their intervention petition for being added in Eviction Suit No.33 of 1991, which was filed by the plaintiffs-opposite party 1st set and 2nd set for eviction of defendant-opposite party 3rd set on the ground of personal necessity. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of this civil revision, the said eviction suit has been decreed against which the defendant of the suit had filed eviction appeal before the learned appellate court and hence he prays to withdraw this petition so that he may be able to file a similar intervention petition before the learned appellate court. As prayed for, this civil revision is dismissed as withdrawn. However, if such a petition is filed, the learned appellate court will decide the same as per its own merit in accordance with law without being prejudiced one way or the other by this order. harish/ ( S.N.Hussain, J)