IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1357 of 2008 KAMAL PASWAN @ KAMAL KISHORE PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 02.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offences under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the name of the petitioner is Kamal Kishore Paswan, however one Kamal Paswan has been named in the first information report, who is said to be the son-in-law of one Rajendra Paswan with whom the petitioner has no concern. It is further submitted that the village in which the occurrence took place is the maternal-in-laws place of the petitioner, and as a matter of fact, he was no available there on the alleged date of occurrence. Learned Addl.P.P., on the other hand, on perusal of the case diary submits that the allegation in the first information report during investigation has been found to be true and witnesses have supported the prosecution case. Considering the above, and the nature of - 2 - allegations levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail. His prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is, accordingly, rejected. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)