IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 20091 of 2011. [O&M] Date of Decision: 1st November, 2011. Parveen Kumar Petitioner through Mr. Surinder Gandhi, Advocate Versus Pt. B.D.Sharma University & Ors. Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 17/18.08.2011 cancelling his B.Sc. Nursing 2nd Year Supplementary Examination held in January, 2011 as a measure of punishment for use of unfair means. The order has been assailed by the petitioner on various grounds including non-observance of the principles of natural justice. It is, however, not in dispute that in terms of Clause 10 of Ordinance No. 4 as contained in the University Calendar, the afore-stated order is appealable before the Vice-Chancellor of the University, who can interfere with the said order suo-moto also. It, however, appears that the period of thirty days to prefer an appeal has expired, may be because the petitioner statedly did not receive any notice before cancellation of the examination. In these circumstances and without expressing any views on the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition by relegating to the above mentioned alternative remedy. The petitioner may submit an appeal-cum-representation to the Vice- Chancellor of the University within one week from the date a certified copy of this order is received. The Vice-Chancellor shall dispose of the petitioner's appeal/representation on merits sympathetically and as early as possible but not later than one month from the date of submission of the appeal. Disposed of. Dasti. November 01, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE