1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. W. P. No. 6020 of 2008. Nathu S/o Morbaji Talwekar & others. vs. Union of India and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri KR Lambat, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri SK Mishra, Asstt. Solicitor General for R-1. Shri C. S. Kaptan with Pallavi Mahashabde, Advocate for R-3. Shri NS Khubakar, Asstt. Government Pleader for R-2, 3 & 5.,Shri Jayant Mokadam, Advocate for R-4. Coram : B.H. Marlapalle and A.H. Joshi, JJ. Dated : 19th December, 2008. In the affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no.3 on 23-6-2008, it has been stated in para 4 as under: “4. The respondent further submits that the tender notice Item No.13 to 20 relate to Wardha District and Item No.17 pertains to Deoli Taluka. The contention of the petitioner that in the present phase VI the works are allotted under the influence of the Hon'ble Minister is incorrect and hence denied. The contention of the petitioner that there is biased approach on the part of this respondent is incorrect. It could be demonstrated from the following chart wherein the implementation of work is demonstrated in the past five phases. 2 Phase Length of road sanctioned Allocation of Funds (Lacs) Length of road constructed in Samudra- pur Taluka Funds allocated (Lacs) II 39.02 KM 642,67 6.23 Km 102.01 III 18.40 Km 263.91 13.40 Km 193.28 IV 12.48 Km 140.6 12.48 Km 140.6 V 226.81 Km 3277.31 52.65 Km 1187.54 [Quoted from page 67 of WP Paper book] In view of the above statement Mr. Lambat, the learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petition could be disposed off as withdrawn, and the undertaking so furnished could be maintained. The undertaking on behalf of the Respondent no.3 as reproduced herein above is noted and the petition is disposed off as withdrawn. JUDGE JUDGE /Muley/