1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5435 OF 2010 (Indrajeetsingh Amriksingh Saluja vs. Sau. Vatsalabai Digambar Amte & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. NOVEMBER 18, 2010. Heard Shri Sirpurkar, learned counsel for the petitioner. He points out that in Misc. Civil Appeal, Ad-hoc District Judge – 1, Chandrapur, has granted temporary injunction to Respondent No. 1 – plaintiff. According to him, the petitioner is a bonafide purchaser of a small portion and the lands with the respondents are sufficient to protect the interest of Respondent No.1. The appellate Court has, after noticing a possibility of confusion, as two documents were obtained at the same time, granted temporary injunction and restrained the petitioner from creating any third party interest in the suit land. The finding does not appear to be perverse at least at this stage. The contention that said finding is perverse, cannot be examined at this stage because the material pertains to domain of adjudication and parties have to lead appropriate evidence in that respect. The other contention that suit as filed in 2008 is time barred, is also not relevant while considering the propriety of grant of relief by the appellate Court. 2 In this situation, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter in writ jurisdiction. However, the proceedings in Regular Civil Suit No. 235 of 2008 are expedited. The Court of 6th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Chandrapur, shall attempt to decide the suit as early as possible and in any case within a period of one year from the date of communication of this order to it. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.