IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41250 of 2008 GUNJAN KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.10.2008 Heard Mr. Partha Sarthy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. Mehta, learned A.P.P. The petitioner was found with the theft properties and accordingly, the properties were seized. The petitioner is in custody for the last one year. The contention is that the seizure list appears containing two dates, one being 21.9.2007 and the other being 29.9.2007. There does not appear any reason to reconcile to it except that it could be a tainted document. Might be that the seizure list could have tainted. The F.I.R. was drawn up on the very day of the occurrence and recovery of the theft properties was made from the possession of the petitioner in presence of the witnesses. The petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner shall be released on bail on 2.1.2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the J.M. Ist Class, Barh, in connection with Mokama P.S. case no.146 of 2007. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )