IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3925 of 2009 RAM PRIT RAI S/O LATE BISHUNDEO RAI, R/O VILLAGE- HANSAPIR, P.S.- MASHRAKH, DISTRICT- SARAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16/04/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel representing the State and for the informant. The petitioner has misused the privilege of bail and due to his deliberate step charge was not framed. Submission is that it was not deliberate step rather the petitioner under section 227 of the Cr.P.C. was pending so he was not attending the court. Now charge has been framed. Before the court below learned APP also submits that the petitioner may be admitted to bail after framing of charge. Prayer for bail has been opposed by the learned APP assisted by the learned counsel for the informant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Ram Prit Rai is directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. Vth, Chapra in S. Tr. No. 253 of 2007 arising out of Isuapur P.S. Case No. 37 of 2006 with condition that one of the bailors shall be a Government/Semi Government employee. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)