AB 163/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE T NK SINGH Heard Mr.BK Mahajan, learned counsel for the petitioner and also learned Addl PP . Perused the Case Diary. On perusal of the Case Diary it appears that the presence of the petitioner is no more required for recovering any incri minating articles. It is also stated that those seals were not seized from his poss ession but those were seized from the house of his father who is now on anticipa tory bail. This being the situation, there is no point in rejecting the app lication for anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In the result, petitioner is allowed to go on pre arrest bail fo r a bond of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of the like amount in connection with Bh aralumukh Police Station Case No.376 of 2010 under Section 419/420/468/471 IPC, to the satisfaction of the arresting authority, with the condition that the peti tioner shall be available as and when necessary by the Investigating Officer of the said case. This order shall be valid for a period of six weeks from today. In the meanwhile, petitioner has to approach the learned concerned Magistrate fo r regular bail. The bail application is allowed.