IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4587 of 2008 Devendra Nath Dikshit , Son of Late Ram Bharosa Sharma, resident of Mohalla- Prabhunath Nagar, Chapra, P.S. Chapra(Muffasil), Town and district-Chapra ( Saran) --Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar, through the Secretary-cum- Commissioner, Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Vikash Bhawan, Patna 2. Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran Division, Chapra 3. District Education Officer, Saran at Chapra 4. Incharge Headmaster, Rashtriya Uchcha Vidyalaya, Narharpur, Chapra 5. District Provident Fund Officer, Saran at Chapra 6. Accountant General,Bihar, Birchand Patel Path, Patna -------------------------------- Respondents. ---------------------------------- 03 29-08-2011 Heard Sri Shivendra Kishore, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rakesh Ambastha, learned A.C. to A.A.G.No. 4, who appears on behalf of Respondent nos.1 to 5/ State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent no.6/ Accountant General,Bihar,Patna. The present writ petition was filed in the year 2008 with a prayer to direct the Respondents to pay all his retiral dues. Despite the fact that the writ petition was filed in the year 2008, no counter affidavit has been filed till date. However, on instruction, Sri Ambastha, learned counsel for the State informs the court that during the pendency of the present writ petition all the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. In view of the stand taken by the learned counsel for the State, there is no need to keep the matter further pending. The writ petition stands disposed of. However, while disposing it of, it is desirable to grant liberty to the petitioner to 2 approach the authority concern, if any claim made in the present writ petition still exists. The petitioner in such situation may file a representation before Respondent no.4/ District Education Officer, Saran at Chapra within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed by the petitioner, Respondent no.4 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. If the Respondent no.4 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within the aforesaid time. In case of refusal, the Respondent no.4 is required to pass speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)