Cri. Appln. No. 2931/11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2931 OF 2011 Sardar Gurumitsing s/o. Sardar Arjunsing Tamana, R/o. Gurudwara Gate No. 5, Shahidpura, Nanded, Tq. and Dist. Nanded. ....Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent. Mr. S.B. Bhapkar, Advocate for applicant. Mr. N.H. Borade, APP for State/respondent. CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 2nd August, 2011. PER COURT : 1. This application is filed for anticipatory bail in Cr. No. 79/11 registered in Bhagyanagar Police Station, Nanded for offences punishable under section 420, 467, 468, 34 etc. of IPC. The papers of investigation were made available. Both the sides are heard. 2. The crime is registered on the basis of report given by one officer of Shriram Transport Company. He has made allegations that Balaji Kandhare and Dilipsing Thakur came to the finance company for getting the hypothecation loan on Cruzer vehicle bearing No.MH-26/S-3018. They had requested for loan of Rs.1,80,000/-. They had brought RTO record in respect of the vehicle. Balaji wanted the loan and Dilipsingh wanted to sign on the document as guarantor. The loan was sanctioned. Cri. Appln. No. 2931/11 2 They got entered the charge in respect of the loan on the RTO record and that record was also shown to the officers of the financial company. Applicant Balaji committed default. When inquiry was made, it is transpired that the aforesaid number was the number of the motorcycle and not the number of the Cruzer vehicle and the owner was different. Thus, the false record was created and the amount was obtained from the financial company. The addresses were also not found to be correct and true. 3. It was submitted for the applicant that name of the applicant is not mentioned in the FIR and he has no concern with the crime. The record of investigation shows that the Field Officer Sharad Beedkar had visited the addresses given and the present applicant had shown the papers in respect of Cruizer jeep to the Field Officer. There is also the statement of one Maheshsingh Gautam to show that present applicant had come with Balaji for getting the loan. There is allegation that Balaji and Dilipsingh are working for present applicant. Such incidents are increasing these days and similar application is pending before this Court bearing Criminal Application No. 3141/11. The modus operandi is similar. In view of these circumstances, it is desirable that there is custodial interrogation and So the application stands rejected. [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] ssc/criapln2931.11