1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1972 OF 2009 Mala Ashok Kumar. .. Petitioner Vs Bank of Baroda & Ors. .. Respondents -- AND WRIT PETITION NO.1973 OF 2009 Batuk D. Shah & Anr. .. Petitioners Vs Bank of Baroda & Ors. .. Respondents -- Shri V.R. Dhond i/by T.N. Tripathi & Co. for the Petitioners. Shri N.P. Shah i/by Little & Co. for Respondent No.1. Shri G. Hariharan along with Shri C.J. Joy i/by Dr. T.C. Kaushik for Respondent No.4. -- CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.M. KHANWILKAR, J DATED : 16TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C. Learned counsel appearing for the Bank submits that neither symbolic nor physical possession of the property in question has been taken. Therefore, their objection before the Forum that the applicant could not take possession was justifiable. 2 2. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners, upon instructions from his clients, submits that symbolic possession of the property in question is hereby offered in favour of the Bank. However, for a period of four weeks, physical possession of the property in question may not be taken. 3. It is in these circumstances, and in view of the statement made by the parties through Counsel, there shall be deemed vesting of symbolic possession in favour of Bank. The physical possession of the property in question however shall not be disturbed for a period of four weeks from today. The petitioners would be at liberty to take recourse to appropriate remedy in accordance with law within such time, if so advised. 4. Petitions disposed of on the above terms. CHIEF JUSTICE A.M.KHANWILKAR, J