IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 24407 of 2007 Between: M. Nageswara Rao, S/o. Venkateswara rao @ Venkateswara Rao Chowdary, Tirupathi-AP. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Chairman and Managing Director, APSPDCL, Renigunta Road, Thirupathi, Chittoor District. 2 The Chief General Manager, APSPDCL, Thirupathi, Chittoor District. 3 Ch. Rambhotlu, S/o. not known, APSPDCL, Thirupathi, Chittoor District. 4 M. Naveen Kumar, S/o. not known, APSPDCL, Thirupathi, Chittoor District. 5 E. Babruvahan, S/o. not known, APSPDCL, Thirupathi, Chittoor District. 6 N. Eswa Reddy, S/o. not known, APSPDCL, Thirupathi, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to pass a Writ, Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and direct the CMD/APSPDCL, Thirupathi to promote the petitioner forthwith to A.D.E. from A.E. on pa with the unofficial respondents from 3 to 6, promoted vide SPDCL proceedings vide SOO (CGM/HRD) Rt.No. 109, dt. 07-9-2004, who are juniors to the petitioners working in the same dis-com, in accordance with the procedure followed in APNPDCL, Warangal in case of Similarly placed persons, pending disposal of the Writ Appeal ﬁled in this Hon'ble Court by the petitioner and others and also to set-aside the speaking order passed by the 2nd respondent of APSPDCL, Thirupathi vide Proceedings., Letter No. CGM(HRD)/DS/AS-1/PO- 1/A1/D.No. 1195/2007, dt. 23-5-2007 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem ﬁt and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.NARSIMLOO Counsel for the Respondent No.: P.R.BALARAMI REDDY(SC FOR AP TRANSCO) The Court made the following : ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner ﬁled a letter into the Registry on 02.09.2008 stating that he has instructions from the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, accordingly. __________ 06-09-2008 rkk