^^i^^-;^^% ^' ^ <> IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATnSGARJI AT BILASPUR w.P.NQ. 12-4-6 / 20Q4 / PETITIONER Laxman Rao Utarwar S/o Shri / Chintaman Rao Utarwar, Aged about 67 years, Ex-Assistant Teacher Priniary School Sarisgar Dist : Korba -(C.G) R/o Vikash Nagar, In front of Circuit House, P.W.D. Colony, BUaspur (C.G.) VERSUS ^A RESPONDENTS :1. ^'State of Chhattisarh Through The ^' \^(] Secretaiy, Adivasi Kalyan Vikash, ^^~ ^^ ^•^' ^/y. ..--^y ^y ^^'" ^ ^-c^ D.K.Mantralaya, Raipur-(C.G.) .^•" ^>^-'' ..'•' •••' ^ ^y'\ 2. The Secretar^7 La\v & Leglslative ••'* V<^\V Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur-(C.G-) 3. ^s .^^•" The Chhattisgarh State Administrative Tribunal, Raipur, Through its Registrar General Raipur, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) .-"^.cf^ 4. Union of India Through the Secretaiy -^' ^ff ^:^^ -^^ Law and Legislative Departnient, Nevv Delhi WRIT PETITION U/A 226 / 227^F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDLdx ,\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.1246 OF 2004 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Laxman Rao Utarwar Versus State of Chhattjsgarh & Others (Writ petition underArticI.e226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Behch : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- None for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State. Shri Vivek Shrivastaya, Advocate for the Union of India. 1. 2; 3. ORDER (Passed on this 29th day of October, 2012) The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitione.r may not be interested in pursuing the matter. Earlier also on 18-2-2009 the matter was dismrssed for waht of prosecution. In view of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Gowri