IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 3936 of 2009 Date of Decision: 15.09.2010 Paramjit Kaur .... Petitioner Versus Surjit Kaur and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present :- Mr. Tribhuwan Singla, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Amandeep Singh Sandhu, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 4, 10, 12 to 14, 20 to 22 ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition is filed challenging order dated 11.6.2009 passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Barnala whereby learned trial Court directed the plaintiff to pay ad valorem court fee on the market value of the sale deed. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that neither plaintiff nor his predecessor-in-interest are the executant of the sale deed in question, hence plaintiff is not supposed to pay ad valorem court fee as directed by the trial Court. The Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 3.5.2010 passed in C.R. No. 22 of 2009 while relying on judgment of Apex Court in the matter of Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh vs. Randhir Singh and others, CA No. 2811-13 of 2010 decided on 29.3.2010 has observed that if plaintiff is not a party to the sale deed in question then he is no supposed to pay ad valorem court fee. C.R. No. 3936 of 2009 2 Present petition stands disposed of in the terms of order dated 3.5.2010 passed by Division Bench of this Court in C.R. No. 22 of 2009. Copy of order dated 3.5.2010 passed by Division Bench of this Court in C.R. No. 22 of 2009 shall be part of this order. (ALOK SINGH) 15.09.2010 JUDGE reena