IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CM No. 16180 of 2011 and CWP No. 21933 of 2011 Date of decision November 30, 2011 Jyoti and another ....... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Manish Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). CM No.16180 of 2011 C.M.is allowed. The writ petition is taken up for hearing immediately. CWP No.21937 of 2011 1. The petitioners seek for protection for the life and liberty claiming that they have married but the fourth respondent is causing harassment and they are apprehensive that their safety may be seriously jeopardized. The petitioners are at liberty to approach the Senior Superintendent of Police, Jalandhar for protection and the second respondent shall take note of the situation and afford to them the protection as the situation calls for. This direction is given without minding whether there is a valid marriage between the parties or not. 2. The writ petition is disposed of. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 30, 2011 archana