IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13989 of 2005 CHANDRIKA MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6. 17.05.2010 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. Bishwa Bibhuti Kumar Singh, learned counsel representing the respondent-Municipal Corporation is present and files a counter affidavit. Though the writ petition was filed on behalf of five writ petitioners but under the orders of this Court dated 23.11.2005 the same has been confined to the petitioner no. 1, while liberty was granted to the other petitioners to move separately. Mr. Singh, learned counsel for the Corporation, with reference to the order dated 4.9.2006 placed at Annexure-A of the counter affidavit, submits that the grievance of the petitioner for payment of the G.P.F. amount for the period prior to March, 1976 has been redressed. It is stated that a cheque sanctioning an amount of Rs. 345/- was issued in the name of Principal for onward payment to the petitioner and a further amount of Rs. 321/- would be deposited in the Treasury against the pension account. It is stated that the petitioner has received the said amount(s) and which is evident from the enclosure to Annexure-A. Having regard to the submissions made in the counter affidavit, the writ petition is disposed of. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.) 2