IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7495 of 2010 BHARAT MUNI MISHRA S/O LATE BASISTH MUNI MISHRA R/O VILLAGE JORWARPUR, P.S. GAJRAJGANJ, DISTT.- BHOJPUR Versus 1. A.G.M. ZONAL OFFICE, STATE BANK OF INDIA BIHAR, PATNA 2. CHIEF MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA BIHAR, PATNA 3. BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA BRANCH AURANGABAD For the Petitioner : M/s Om Prakash Upadhyay, Mithilesh Kr. Upadhyay, advocates. For the Bank : M/s S.D. Sanjay, Gopal Prasad Gupta, advocates. ----------- 04. 26.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State Bank of India(hereinafter referred to as the Bank), who states that as incomplete facts are stated in the writ application he has not been able to file counter affidavit, as was directed by this Court under orders dated 9.7.2010. 2. Having heard counsel for the petitioner and the Bank, I am of the view that for the relief prayed for in the writ application petitioner should be well advised to file representation before the General Manager of the Bank giving details of the facts on the basis of which he is praying for the relief prayed for in the writ application, so as to enable the General Manager of the Bank to verify the records and pass appropriate order in accordance with law. If any amount is found due to the petitioner, the same be paid as early as possible, in any case within three months from the date of receipt of the representation of the petitioner along with a copy of this order in the office of the General Manager. It is made clear that General Manager before passing the order shall take appropriate instruction or report from the competent authority of the Bank. 3. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.) 2