IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 1008 of 2008 Raj Pal Singh …….Petitioner. Versus Sahkari Ganna Vikas Samiti Limited …Respondent. Sri Lalit Miglani, Advocate present for the petitioner. Sri Manav Sharma, Advocate present for the respondent. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Sri Lalit Miglani, Advocate for the petitioner as well as Sri Manav Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. The petitioner was an employee of Cooperative Cane Development Society, Laksar, district Haridwar. Initially when his services were terminated he challenged his termination order by filing a claim petition before the Labour Court, Dehradun and the Labour Court passed an order for reinstatement of the petitioner in service. Subsequently thereafter, by an order of this Court dated 23.5.2002 the writ petition filed by the Cooperative Cane Development Society was partly allowed inasmuch as though backwages were not given to the petitioner, his continuity in service was directed to be maintained. The petitioner now filed a writ petition stating that inspite of Court’s order his continuity in service is not being maintained. The respondent society in its counter affidavit has stated that in compliance of the Court’s order continuity in service of the petitioner has been maintained and he is being given seniority considering him to be in continuous service since 24.12.1971. However, the grievance of the petitioner still remains as the counsel contends that what has been stated by the respondent is not true inasmuch 2 as he is not getting the salary which he is liable to get considering more than 40 years of continuous service in the Society. On these set of facts, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the Assistant Cane Commissioner, Haridwar to look into the matter and fix the salary of the petitioner in accordance with law considering the fact that the petitioner is continuing in service in the respondent society since 1971 and also taking into consideration the fact that the Society has admitted that seniority is being given to the petitioner. The petitioner is at liberty to file a representation along with a copy of this order before the Assistant Cane Commissioner, Haridwar who shall pass a speaking order on the representation moved by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible but in any case after six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 22.3.2011 Avneet