1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL (St.) NO. 13370 OF 2008 Dattatraya M. Rayate ........Applicant versus Tukaram N. Rayate ........ Respondent. Mr. Vivek Salunkhe i/b P.B. Shah adv. for the Applicant None for the respondent CORAM: A. P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 14th JANUARY, 2009. P.C.: 1. The order dated 10-9-2008 passed by the Registrar is challenged by filing present application, which is treated as a Revision on a request orally made by the learned counsel for the applicant. By the impugned order four weeks time was granted for removal of office objection and the impugned order was conditional order to the effect that failure to remove the office objection within the stipulated time, would result in revocation of the registration of the appeal. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal was under objection about non supply of certified copy. The certified copy is said to have been filed on 30-9-2008 and the appeal has been dismissed on a mistaken assumption that 2 the order dated 10-9-2008 has not been complied with. In this view of the matter, the application is allowed. The order dated 10-9-2008 passed by the Registrar is set aside and appeal is restored to file. Appeal be listed for admission on Saturday, 17-1-2009. Copy of the order dated 10-9-2008 is taken on record and marked as `X' for identification. Application is disposed of. (A. P. DESHPANDE, J.)