THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 12095 OF 2011 Date: 26.04.2011 Between: Dharmapuri Colony Welfare Association and others ..... PETITIONERS AND Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner Hyderabad and others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.12095 OF 2011 O R D E R : This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents 1 to 3 herein in not taking any action against the 4th respondent for removal of the alleged unauthorized construction of house made in Plot No.7 admeasuring 208 sq.yards situated at Sri Sai Ram Nagar Colony, Uppal, Hyderabad is arbitrary and illegal. The members of the 1st petitioner-Association claim to be the residents of Dharmapuri Colony, Uppal, Hyerabad and the 2nd and 3rd petitioners are the residents of Sri Sai Ram Nagar Colony. Alleging that the 4th respondent herein has been making illegal and unauthorized construction of house of the said plot, the petitioners made several representations including the representation dated 16.04.2011. Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents 1 to 3 in considering the representations of the petitioners, the present writ petition has been filed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 3. As the material available on record shows that the representations made by the petitioners complaining about the alleged illegal and unauthorized constructions being made by the 4th respondent was acknowledged by the office of the Corporation, the learned standing counsel states that the same would be considered and appropriate action would be taken in accordance with law. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to the correctness of the allegations made, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representations made by the petitioners and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law after giving an opportunity to the 4th respondent to rebut the allegations. Such exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. No costs. ​ ____________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 26.04.2011 Ivd