IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42961 of 2010 PANKAJ KUMAR YADAV, son of Sri Nirmal Yadav, R.O.V Jhalighat, P.S-Janki Nagar, Dist-Purnea. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Smt. Poonam Devi, D/o Nandi Lal Yadav, W/o Pankaj Kumar Yadav, R.O.V Nado, P.s.-Saurbazar, Dist-Saharsa. ----------- 2 26.3.2011 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. Petitioner is an accused for offences punishable under sections 498(A) of the Penal Code and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the husband of the informant and has falsely implicated in this case due to the instigation of ill wishers of the family. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has always been ready and willing to keep the informant as his legally wedded wife with all love and affection and there has already been compromise between the parties. 4. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within fifteen days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the petitioner, namely, Pankaj Kumar, is directed to be enlarged on bail on executing bail bond of Rs. 10,000.00(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Saurbazar P.S. Case No. 239 of 2005 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Prakash (S.N.Hussain, J.)