IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS MONDAY, THE 7TH JUNE 2010 / 17TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 15861 of 2010(G) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. LAKSHMI AMMAL, D/O.SARASWATHI AMMAL, AGED 81 YEARS, PLOT NO.345, NEERAMANKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. RADHAKRISHNAN, T.C.37/409 & 410, KOOPPAKARAMADOM STREET, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.P.SHINOD SRI.RAM MOHAN.G. RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. SUBRAMONIYAN, S/O.NARAYANAN EMBRAM, T.C.37/411, KOOPPAKARAMADOM STREET, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS. R5 BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT SRI.P.ANOOP (MULAVANA) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.15861 OF 2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 28.2.2004 IN OS NO.2210/1998 OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RENT CONTROL) COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. EXT.P2.TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 12.5.2010 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT. K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.15861 of 2010-G ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 7th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioners have approached this Court alleging harassment by respondents 1 to 4 by way of interference in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the 5th respondent. Petitioners seek the following reliefs: “1. to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction commanding the respondents 1 to 4 not to interfere with the inter se civil dispute between the petitioners and the 5th respondent and not to forcibly evict the petitioners from the premises which is the subject matter of dispute in O.S No.2210/1998 of the Additional Munsiff's (Rent Control) Court, Thiruvananthapuram. 2. to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction commanding respondents 1 to 4 not to harass the petitioners by summoning them to the police station and threatening them in connection with the civil dispute pending with the 5th respondent.” 2. We heard the learned counsel for the parties including the Government Pleader. Learned Government WPC 15861/2010 -2- Pleader, on instruction, submits that the official respondents will not interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioners and the 5th respondent. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is closed. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS