IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 6TH PHALGUNA 1932 LA.App..No. 443 of 2002() ------------------------- LAR.239/1998 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,PARAVUR .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------ STATE OF KERALA BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. LATHA T.THANKAPPAN RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANTS ------------------------ 1. KALIKUTTY, W/O.KUMARAN,MEPPARIYADATH, NAYATHODE. 2. RAJAN,S/O.KALIKUTTY,MEPPARIYADATH, NAYATHODE. 3. SADANANDAN, S/O. KALIKUTTY, MEPPARIYADATH,NAYATHODE. 4. VIJAYAN,S/O.KALIKUTTY,MEPPARIYADATH, NAYATHODE. 5. SOBHA, D/O.KALIKUTTY,MEPPARIYADATH, NAYATHODE. 6. SYAMALA, D/O. KALIKUTTY,MEPPARIYADATH, NAYATHODE. 7. SAJINI, D/O. KALIKUTTY,MEPPARIYADATH, NAYATHODE. 8. JAYA, D/O. KALIKUTTY,MEPPARIYADATH, NAYATHODE. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ----------------------------------------------- LAA. No. 443 of 2002 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T Pius C.Kuriakose, J. This appeal is coming up in the defect list. The learned Govt. Pleader sought for time to cure the defect. We are not inclined to grant time. We have gone through the impugned judgment. We are of the view that the market value refixed by the court below under the impugned judgment is not excessive. Hence we reject the appeal. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) (N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) ksv/- -2- PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. LAA. No. 443 OF 2002 JUDGMENT 25th February, 2011