•^ \ HI6H COWT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BIUISPUR W.P.No. 1674/2006 COKAIA: Hon'ble Shri S.R.Nayak, Chief Justice A Hon'ble; Shri Dtlip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. PETETtONER GurudarshcHi Singh Lamba, S/o Shri J.5.Lamba, aged about 30 years, occupation Advocate, r/o DeepcA Nagar Durg, Tahsil and District Durg (CG) V/s RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhatf'isgarh -rtirough the Secretary, Department of Home Affmrs. Chhattisgarh, b.K.S.Building Raipur (C.S.) 2. The Supermtendent of Police, Hiikii, bistrict Durg (C©). 3. The Mona9ing Director, Steel Authority of India Limited, Bhilai, District Durg (C6) 4. Sourav Ispat Private Limited, through Bhagwati Raite 5/o Late Ourga Pnasud Badri Prasad Raika, Heavy Area CTndustrial), Bhopal (M.P.) 5. SatyouTorayon, posted Weighin9 Clerk at Stock Yard, Steel ^u-thority of India Limited, Bhilai Ofstricf- Ourg (Cff) Smt. Renu Kochar, Coimsel for the petitioner. Shri Vinay Harit, Oy.A.G. for the State. OKAL ORDER O'assed on 19.4.2006) The foltowing oral order of the Courf was passed by S.R. Nayak, C.J. This writ petition is fited by cn Advocate practicing in Ourg, as piw bono public charocter, as a Public Interest Litigation. Althou^i the allegation roade in paragraph 5.1 is incomprehensible, what we could gather from the leamed counsel for the petitioner in -the course of hearing is that one Shri Satyananiyana who is a weighing clerk in •the service of Bhilai Steel Plant on 15.2.2006 atlowed additionat iron to be tifted by one Sourav Isptat Private Limited and the value of the additional iron so lifted was Rs.50,000/-, ond the said Salyanaraya -z- iADi^TIL *y -z.- has been indulging in such illegal activities and though this matter was reported in the local media, the administrotion of Bhifai Steel Pkmt has not taken caiy corrective steps against the said Scrtyanarayana. The petitioner has rushed to this Court wi'thout bringmg the alleged idegal act on the part of said SatyBnarayana to the administration of Bhilai Steet Plont. Secondly, the athsged act on the pwt of a petty official like Satyanarayana, Weighing Clerk, could not fae subj/sct matter of a ftjblic In+erest Litigation. 2. Above all, the pleading hid before this Court is dS vague as it could be and whatever litt-le said is ala> not coroprehensive. For all these redsons, we declme to entertain this Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is •therefore, dismissed. However. this order shall not come in the way the petitioner to bring -the alleged illegal aet on the part of said Satyonarayona to •the notice of odministration of B.S.P., if he so desires. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Juclese