C.R. No.767 of 2007 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.767 of 2007 Date of Decision. 04.10.2011 Gunjan wife of Mr. Malwinder Singh, son of Sh. Joginder Singh, resident of 7/281, Dilbagh Nagar Extension, Jullandhar .....Petitioner Versus Mr. Malwinder Singh son of Sh. Joginder Singh, resident of house No.898, Phase-X (First Floor), Mohali .....Respondent Present: None. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J. 1. The revision petition is against the order of interim maintenance granted by the trial Court in favour of wife at Rs.2000/- per month and Rs.3100/- as litigation expenses in the petition filed by the husband for divorce on the ground of cruelty and harassment. The wife has come on revision seeking for enhancement of the order passed by the Court. 2. At the time when the case was brought for admission before this Court, the counsel appearing for the petitioner has sought for time for production of copy of jamabandi to show that the respondent was owner of some land and to also produce some documents that he was co-sharer in a manufacturing unit. The case has been adjourned sine die with the direction to be posted before Court when the needful is done. No document has been filed all along and the Registry has secured C.R. No.767 of 2007 -2- orders from the Acting Chief Justice for disposal in accordance with law. 3. Since the matter is of the year 2007, I proceed to dispose of the case on the basis of records although learned counsel for the petitioner is not present before Court to represent a case nor has the petitioner produced, which was directed to be produced when the Court took up the matter on file. I find that even the notice has not been issued to the respondents and in the absence of any better materials, there was simply no justification for the petitioner to seek for enhancement. The order passed already by the Additional District Judge shall stand affirmed and the revision petition is dismissed. 4. The trial shall be taken up and disposed of as expeditiously as possible having regard to the fact that the case is of the year 2006. If on the other hand, the trial is already in progress or has been over, the disposal of the civil revision could not alter the state of things before the trial Court. It shall be left to the trial Court to consider any plea for enhancement of maintenance if any independent application is moved and any better materials are produced before the trial Court. It will take effect only from the date when such a request is made and shall not reopen the determination of maintenance already made. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE October 04, 2011 Pankaj*