IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Civil Contempt No. 183 of 2004 Dinesh Chand Pokhriyal S/O Late Gitaram Pokhriyal, R/O Village and post Padampur, Sukhro, District Pauri and another. ...... Petitioners. Versus Shri Dilip Singh Tomar IFS Prabandh Nideshak, Uttaranchal Forest Development Corporation, Dehradun and two others. ... Respondents. Sri Jitendra Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioners. Sri V.K.Bist, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Sangeeta Miyan, learned counsel for the respondents. Date May 08, 2008. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Heard Sri Jitendra Chaudhary, learned counsel for the applicant-petitioners and Sri V.K.Bist, Senior Advocate, with Sri Ms. Sangeeta Miyan, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the record. This contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondents for willful defiance of the judgment and orders dated 25-9-2003 and 23-12-2003 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 563 of 2003, Dinesh Chand Pokhriyal and others Vs. Uttaranchal Forest Development Corporation and others. This Court by the order dated 25-9-2003 had held that the petitioners shall also be entitled to continuity of service and reinstatement. So far as the reinstatement of the petitioners with continuity of service is concerned, the petitioners have already been given appointment as is evident from Annexure No. 1 to counter affidavit dated 4-01-2008 filed by the opposite parties. Sri V.K. Bist, Senior Advocate with Ms. S.Miyan appearing on behalf of the opposite parties-Uttaranchal Forest Development Corporation has urged that the opposite parties may be allowed reasonable time to make payment of back wages to the petitioners. In the circumstances of the case, the contempt petition is dismissed. Notices issues to the respondents are discharged. It is provided that if the back wages are not paid to the respondents within reasonable time, the petitioners may file fresh contempt petition against the respondents. All pending applications stand disposed of. (B.S. Verma, J.) RCP