IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 6TH DECEMBER 2011 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 31284 of 2011(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.R. ANANDAN, PROPRIETOR, DEV AND DEV ASSOCIATES, KUZHIVELITHARA HOUSE, THAYAMKARY.P.O. EDATHUA, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW JAMES RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 2. GENERAL MANAGER, DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, ALAPPZHA-686001. 3. GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, SS KOVIL ROAD, THAMBANOOR,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695014. 4. BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, EDATHUA, ALAPPUZHA-689573. 5. BANKING OMBUDSMAN, RESERVE BANK BUILDING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 6. DISTRICT ANIMAL HUSBANDRY OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA-688001. SR.GOVT.PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASREE SRI.N.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/12/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.31284/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITIONERS PROJECT REPORT FOR DUCK HATCHERY. EXT.P1A TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF HEAD OF THE KERALA VATERINARY AND ANIMAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH DEPARTMENT. EXT.P1B TRUE COPY OF THE BROCHURE PUBLISHED BY THE LOCAL HEAD OFFICE OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT BANK. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RECOMMENDATION LETTER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE SENIOR VETERINARY SURGEON IN THE LOCALITY. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 21-2-2011. EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPH OF THE PETITIONERS HATCHERY UNIT EXT.P6A TRUE COPY OF THE PHGOTOGRAPH OF THE PETITIONER HATCHERY UNIT. EXT.P6B TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPH OF THE PETITIONERS HATCHERY UNIT EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITIONERS REQUEST TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P8 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT EXT.P9 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITIONERS REPLY TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT EXT.P10 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 31-8-2011 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P11 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 12-9-2011 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT BANKING OMBUDSMAN //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 31284 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 6th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner says that he submitted Ext.P1 project report for starting a hatchery and that the same was recommended by the respondents. He made an application for loan of `20 lakhs, but however only `7 lakhs was sanctioned. He made an application for enhancing the amount. However, at that stage, loan was recalled and was cancelled as a result the petitioner says that the project itself had to be dropped and that he lost all his investments. He has therefore moved the 5th respondent by filing Ext.P11 complaint and even the complaint remains unattended. It is in these circumstances the writ petition is filed mainly seeking a direction to the 5th respondent to take appropriate action on Ext.P11. 2. I heard the standing counsel appearing for respondents 3 and 4 also. 3. Essentially the grievance is regarding the inaction on Ext.P11, which is a complaint made by the petitioner before the 5th respondent. Now that according to the petitioner, the said WPC No.31284/11 :2 : complaint is pending, without expressing anything on the merits of the contentions raised, I direct the 5th respondent to take appropriate action on Ext.P11 with notice to the parties concerned and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp