REVN.403.20111 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.403 OF 2011 Union of India Applicant versus Ashok C. Mehta and others Respondents Mr.S.K.Shinde for applicant. Mr.Ramdas Hake i/by S.P.Kadam for respondent no.1. Mr.Rajesh More, APP for State. CORAM : R.V.MORE, J. DATE : 29th November 2011 PC : 1. Heard learned counsel for parties. By the present revision application filed under section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Union of India is challenging the order of Special Judge for CBI passed in Miscellaneous Application Nos.178 to 182 in CBI Special Case No.3 of 1987, dated 11th December 2008, whereby the respondent nos.1 to 5 came to be discharged from the offences punishable under sections 120(b), 420, 467, 468, 471 of Indian Penal Code. 2. The respondent nos.1 to 5 herein have repaid all the dues of the bank and settled the dispute. After settlement, the civil proceedings against present respondent nos.1 to 5 have came to an end. In the Special Case, the learned Special Judge for CBI after considering all the facts and circumstances on record, discharged them. It should be mentioned here that Dattatraya Mhatre, the main accused in CBI Special Case No.3 of 1987, a public servant, also came to be acquitted of the offences charged against him by the CBI Special Court for Greater Bombay vide judgment dated 15th December 2008. Learned counsel for REVN.403.20112 the applicant submits that an appeal against the order of acquittal of the main accused is filed, however, same is neither admitted nor any order is passed therein. 3. Having gone through the the impugned order dated 11th December 2008 carefully I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order. The revision application accordingly stands dismissed. (R.V.MORE, J.)