$m§§%@ §3@m% 1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIsGARH AT BILAsPUR w.P. (S) No. if éw /2o11 PETITIONER @makant Sharma S/o Bharat Prasad Sharma, aged about 56 years, Occupation Service, Posted as Head Master Middle School Dullapur, Block Pandariya, District Kabirdham ’, C.G. VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1K/State of C.G. through the Secretary School Education Department , DKS Bhawan Raipur, C.G. / 2. The District Education Officer, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham C.G. / 3. The Joint Director Treasury and Pension, Kawardha, District Kabirdham C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF'THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF . MANDAMUSICERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTIONIORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. t MAY THIS PLEASE TO YOUR LORDSHIP, HIGH COURT OF CHHA’I‘TISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER w.P.gsp.No. 7685/201 1 Shri Rakesh Pandey, counsel for thc: patim'oner. Shri Glandresh Shrivastava, P.L. for fhe State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (15.12.2011; Grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay scale of Rs. 150 and after completion of probation, he was granted regular pay scale ofRs. 169—300. Contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that he is entitled for regular pay scale with effect from the date. of initial appointment. and his case is squarely coveted with number of decisions passed by this Court and also the judgment réldei‘ed by the M.P. State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu at. 56 Others Vs. State ofM.P. & Others) where in it has been held that similarly placed teachers are entitled for regular pay scale from the date of their initial appointment. It is not disputed by both the parties that the matter was taken up by the State to the Apex Court but the appeal was also dismissed by the Apex Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers] Assistant Teacheis are entitled for regular pay scale from the date of their initial appointment. In View of the above submission made by the counsel” for the parties, the petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation, if so advised, in PETITIONER Ramakant Verma Versus RESPONDENTS Sfate of (Shhat‘dsgarh 85 OThers Petition (Civil) NO. 6892/93 by order dated 03.01‘95, flm petitioner may be entitled to same relief accordingly. Pritinker Diwaker Judge