THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH CONTEMPAT CASE NO:1026 OF 2011 DATE:10.10.2011 BETWEEN A.ESWARAIAH …PETITIONER AND SRI RAGHUNADH & ANOTHER …RESPONDENTS. THIS COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH CONTEMPAT CASE NO:1026 OF 2011 ORDER: The present contempt case is filed by the petitioner seeking to punish the respondents under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Court Act for non implementation of the order of this Court dated 28.03.2011 passed in W.P.No:6750 of 2011. The respondents are present before the Court and their presence is dispensed with. The writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus to declare the impugned action of the respondents particularly the 3rd respondent in terminating his service vide proceedings Rc.No:C9/2301/EGS/2008, dated 13.8.2008 without verifying the records and thereby effecting right to his livelihood as highly illegal, arbitrary and voilative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the guidelines contained in Circular No:4553/NREGS-Andhra Pradesh/2008, dated 2.7.2008 issued by the 1st respondent and consequently, to set aside the same. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court by order dated 28.3.2011 disposed of the writ petition as under: “In the facts and circumstances, the order impugned is set aside and consequently, the respondents are directed to follow the guidelines contained in Circular No:143/SRDS/HR Mannual/2009, dated 27.1.2010 as well as the guidelines contemplated under the orders of this Court in W.P.No:28339 of 2010 and pass appropriate orders within a period of one (1) month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” In the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case, it is stated that pursuant to the disposal of the writ petition, the petitioner got issued a notice dated 7.7.2011 requesting the respondents to implement the orders of this Court and in spite of receipt of the same, the respondents have not taken any action and therefore, it amounts to willful disobedience of the orders of this Court. At this stage, while placing before this Court a copy of the proceedings in C.9/R.C.No:2301/Veeraballi/4 S.,A./2010, dated 16.7.2010 issued by the Project Director, District Water Management, Kadapah, the learned G.P appearing for the respondents contended that the case of the petitioner has been considered and consequently, necessary proceedings have been issued in that regard. It is further submitted that in view of the proceedings dated 16.7.2010, which have been issued in compliance of the order of this Court, the contempt case is liable to be dismissed. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the proceedings dated 16.7.2010, I am of the considered view that the very issuance of the proceedings dated 16.7.2010 itself, amounts to compliance with the order of this Court and thereby, the contempt case is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed. No costs. ______________________ Justice G.Chandraiah. Gurc. Date:10.10.2011 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH CONTEMPAT CASE NO:1026 OF 2011 DATE:10.10.2011