IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.2032 of 2008 Date of decision: February 3, 2009 Dr. Anju ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. R.K. Malik, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Parveen Kr. Rohilla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) This writ petition has been filed challenging the transfer order (Annexure P-4) of the petitioner. In the written statement it was stated that the petitioner was transferred on complaint basis. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the transfer order was based on the complaint as well as preliminary inquiry which was held at the back of the petitioner wherein the allegations have been held not proved and prays for quashing the transfer order. In my opinion, this writ petition can be decided not by quashing the transfer order but by directing the respondent No.1 to consider the question of transfer of the petitioner afresh. Consequently, this writ petition is disposed off. In the meantime, status quo be maintained till such fresh order is passed. February 03, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE