THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH W.P.NO.17693 OF 2004 O R D E R Heard both the counsel. 2. The petitioner joined in the service of the 2nd respondent on 11.2.1985 and worked as Cane Weaving Instructor and retired in the month of October, 1999 on attaining the age of superannuation. As he was not given pay revision of 1986, he filed writ petition before this court in W.P.No.35188/1998 and by order dated 14.4.2000, this court directed the respondent – corporation to re-fix the pay of the petitioner in terms of the report of the pay revision commission as per the orders of the Government in G.O.Ms.No.172 dated 7.7.1986 and the said order of the learned single Judge has been confirmed in the writ appeal in W.A.No.857/2000 dated 28.7.2000. Now the grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents have miscalculated the amount in the pay fixation and have withheld an amount of Rs.96,221/- under different heads and though he made number of representations, the respondents have not paid him the amount and hence he filed the present writ petition. 3. The respondents have filed a detailed counter and the tenor of which is that as per the directions of this court, they have paid the amounts that are due to the petitioner and hence sought for dismissal of the writ petition. 4. In the present case, the dispute is with regard to the calculation of the amount, which this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, cannot decide and hence the writ petition is disposed of with the following direction: “The petitioner is given liberty to file a fresh application for his claim, giving detailed calculation, with supporting documents, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this court and within a period of one month thereafter, the respondents shall consider the same in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders.” 5. No order as to costs. AVS ----------------------------- 10—03—2011