IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA WRIT PETITION NO : 3588 of 2005 Between: Smt. Sulochanamma, Shop No. 2, Paipad Vilalge, Waddepally Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Collector, Mahaboobnagar district. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gadwal, Mahaboobnagar district. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Waddepally Mandal, Mahaboobnagar district. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent herein is cancellation of authorisation without considering my explanation and with a sole motive or appointing the person belonging to congress party as illegal, improper, arbitrary and against the principals of natural justice besides being violative of Art. 14, 16, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the respondent to revoke the cancellation of authorisation and reinstate the petitioner as F.P. Shop -II dealer of Paiped Village of Waddepally Mandal, Mahaboobnagar district. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.R.RAMANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court at the stage of admission made the following : ORAL ORDER: Heard both sides. Perused the material placed before me. It appears that the second respondent herein suspended the authorisation of the petitioner as fair price shop dealer by an order dated 25-10-2004. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the first respondent herein, which was dismissed. However, the grievance of the petitioner is that the appellate authority had disposed of the appeal without assigning any reasons and without considering the material placed before him. For the aforementioned reasons, without expressing any further opinion, the writ petition is allowed. The impugned order is set aside and the first respondent is directed to dispose of the appeal afresh by passing a reasoned order after giving due opportunity to the petitioner. With the above direction, the writ petition is allowed at the admission stage. No costs. -------------------------- kvsn 16-03-2005 To 1 The Joint Collector, Mahaboobnagar district. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gadwal, Mahaboobnagar district. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Waddepally Mandal, Mahaboobnagar district. 4 Two CCs to GP for Civil Supplies, High Court buildings, Hyderabad. 5 Two CD copies.