W THE H1GH COUKl' OP CHHATl'lSGAKH : BILASPUK W.P.No.534of20U6 Petitioner State of Chhattisgarti, tbrough the Uivteional Forest OfBcer, Soufh Surguja Porest Division, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (Chhattisgarh) Versus Respondents 1, Satisn. Bahadur Sin^h, S/o Lsl Baliadur Singh, R/o Kdarpur, Post- Aiabikapur, Dfett. Surguja (CIihatisgarh) Presidiag Of&cer, Labour Court, Anabikapur, Distt. Surguja 2. WRIT PETITION UNDER ART1CLE 226/227 OPTHE CONSlTl'U'nON OPINDIA (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satisfa K. Agnihotri J.) Ms. Sunita Jaui, Pauel l^w^'er for fhe petitioner/State. Shri A. N. Bhakta, Advocate for ftic respondcnt No. 1. ORDE R (Passed on this 28th Day ofFebruaiy, 2009) The petitioner/State has fited tfais petition chaUengiag ftie award dated 26.5.2005 (Aimcxure P/1), passed by the Presiding Ofi&cer, Labour Court, Ambikapur in Case No. 37/ID Act/2002 (Ret), whereby th.e respondeut No.l was directed to be reiastated as rutenial security labour, witbout back wages. Lcaraed counsel appearing tbr fhe respondent No. l has produced a copy of the order dated 10.9.2008, whereby the respond.cnt No. 1 toas been appoiuted ou the post of Porest Guard ia the regular pay scale of Rs. 2750-70-3800-75-4400. Copy of the order is taken on record. On uistructions, learued counsel further submits tbat the respondent No. 1 will not claun for any back wagcs. In view ofthe above, accordiug to learacd coiuisel appearit^ for ffae petitioner/State, nothing survitfes ia this luatter for adjudication. Thus, the petition stauds disposed o£ No order asto costs. Thakur Sd/- _ . SaUshK,A^om Judge