IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.714 of 2009 RAM KISHORE SAH Versus SUNAINA DEVI & ORS. ----------- 09/ 07.07.2010 We have heard counsel for the appellant and the respondents. Mr. M.P. Gupta appearing for the respondents, seeks no relief in so far as the respondent no. 1 is concerned, in view of the materials with regard to her noticed in the judgment under appeal. The relief sought for is confined to the two minor daughters born from the marriage, who have been awarded Rs. 500/- each as maintenance. The only submissions of the Appellant is that since he was unemployed he is unable to make any payment does not impress us. Being an able bodied male it is his bounden legal, social and moral duty to look after his minor daughters. The appeal is dismissed with the only modification of the order dated 27.03.2008 to the extent that it allowed Rs. 500/- as maintenance every month to respondent no. 1. S.Sb/- (Navin Sinha, J.) (Jyoti Saran, J.) 2