1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1970 OF 2010 (Paramsukh Motiramji Nandgauli) -: VERSUS :- (Vinod Shikshan Sanstha & Others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Smt. M. P. Munshi Adv for petitioner. Shri Thakre AGP for respondents 3 & 4. Shri S. Borkar Adv for respondents 1 & 2. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : OCTOBER 5, 2010. Heard Smt Munshi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Borkar learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 and Shri Thakre learned AGP for the respondents 3 and 4. Smt. Munshi has placed before this Court the past history to show that petitioner has been victimized. She has also invited attention to reply filed by Education Officer which according to her supports the case of petitioner before School Tribunal. In these circumstances learned counsel argues that interim 2 reinstatement ought to have been granted by school tribunal. Shri Borkar learned counsel has supported the impugned order. He has attempted to show that there are some serious complaints against the petitioner in the matter. Learned AGP has gone by the reply filed before the School Tribunal by the Education officer. Appeal filed by petitioner is assailing termination dated 19th December 2008 w.e.f. 20th December 2008. In this situation period of more than one year and six months has already expired. I, therefore, find that interest of justice can be met with by directing respondent no.4 School Tribunal to decide petitioner’s appeal at the earliest so as to put an end to all controversies. Accordingly the proceedings Appeal No. STC- 1 of 2009 on the file of respondent no.4 are expedited and School Tribunal is directed to decide appeal as early as possible and in any case within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order. Writ Petition is disposed of with these directions. JUDGE SVK