: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1482 OF 2006 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1482 OF 2006 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1482 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2389 OF 2006 SUMMARY SUIT NO.2389 OF 2006 SUMMARY SUIT NO.2389 OF 2006 Easy Tec (India) Pvt. Ltd. .. Plaintiffs. Versus Fortis Bank .. Defendants. Mr.Shamim i/b.Shamim & Co. for plaintiffs. Mr.Zubin Behramkamdin, Ms.Maneesha Kongovi i/b.Bharucha & Partners for defendants in support of chamber summons. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATE : 13th October, 2008. DATE : 13th October, 2008. DATE : 13th October, 2008. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. This chamber summons is taken out to have 54 days delay condoned in the matter of filing Vakalatnama by the defendants. 2. I have heard learned Advocates on both the sides. : 2 : Perused the affidavit in support and affidavit in reply. The defendants have their address at Brussels and they have also another address in Amsterdam. The explanation given in the affidavit in support of the chamber summons goes to show that some time was taken to contact people beyond Bombay and that has resulted in causing delay in filing Vakalatnama. Considering the fact that the defendants have their functioning beyond Greater Bombay, I am inclined to grant this chamber summons by taking a lenient view. Hence the order :- O R D E R O R D E R O R D E R i) Chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). There shall be no order as to costs. ii) Vakalatnama is also on record. It should be accepted as Vakalatnama on behalf of the defendants. (R.Y. GANOO,J.) (R.Y. GANOO,J.) (R.Y. GANOO,J.)