IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 40 OF 2003 [FOR RESTORATION] IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 279 OF 2002 [FOR RESTORATION] IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 634 OF 1988 Hajarbi Mohammad Hanif Qureshi and Ors. .......Appellants Verus Zorabi Hassanbhai Patel & Ors. ........Respondents Mr.T.D.Deshmukh,adv.for appellants. Mr.Prathamesh Bargude h/f.Mr.S.B.Deshmukh,adv.for respondent no.3. Coram: Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota, J. Dated : 21 st August, 2008. P.C. : 1. This Civil Application is taken out by the revision applicant for restoration of Civil Application No. 279 of 2002 which was for restoration of Civil Revision Application. Mr.Bargude, learned counsel for the respondent, submits that, there was another round of application for restoration earlier and hence this application ought not to be allowed. According to the applicants, the matter remained unattended because the counsel was busy elsewhere. The main application, i.e., Civil Revision Application arises out of execution proceedings. Therefore, in my opinion, despite utter negligence shown by the revision applicants, they be given a chance to have the Civil Revision Application heard on merits. The Civil Application is allowed on condition that the applicants pay costs quantified at Rs.5,000/- in one set to be paid to respondents no.1 and 2. Civil Application No. 279 of 2002 restored to file. By consent, the same is immediately taken up for hearing. Civil Application No. 279 of 2002 is granted on condition that the applicants pay costs quantified at Rs.1,000/- in one set to respondents no.1 and 2. The cost to be paid within 1 week from today. The Civil Revision Application to appear on board for admission on 30th August, 2008. [Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota, J]