IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3695 of 2008 SMT.ANITA DEVI @ SANDHYA DEVI, WIFE OF SHRI RAKESH TIWARY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE & P.O. JAGADISHPUR PANCHAYAT RAJ JAGADISHPUR, P.S. & BLOCK BIJAIPUR, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ (BIHAR). ---- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DIRECTOR, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, GOPALGANJ, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. 5. THE COLLECTOR/DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GOPALGANJ, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. 6. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME/WELFARE OFFICER, GOPALGANJ, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. 7. THE DIRECTOR, CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 8. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, BIJAIPUR, BLOCK & P.S. BIJAIPUR, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. 9. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER-CUM-BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BIJAIPUR, BLOCK & P.S. BIJAIPUR, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. 10. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, HATHUA, SUB-DIVISIONAL HATHUA, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. 11. SHRI SANJAY SAH, THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ JAGADISHPUR, BLOCK & P.S. BIJAIPUR, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. 12. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ JAGADISHPUR, BLOCK & P.S. BIJAIPUR, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. 13. THE HEADMASTER, GOVERNMENT MIDDLE SCHOOL, JAGADISHPUR, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, JAGADISHPUR, BLOCK & P.S. BIJAIPUR, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. 14. SMT. GAYATRI DEVI, WIFE OF SANTOSH GUPTA, RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 13, VILLAGE & P.O. JAGADISHPUR, BLOCK & P.S. BIJAIPUR, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. ---- RESPONDENTS. For the petitioner :- Mr. Nityanand Mishra, Advocate For the State :- Mr. S.C. 21. ----------- 2 13.4.2011 This writ application has been filed making a prayer for quashing the appointment of respondent no. 14 who had been appointed on the post of Anganwari Sevika. The ground for quashing the order is that it has been stated that the procedure for appointment has not been properly followed and that respondent 2 no. 14 is the cousin daughter-in-law of respondent no. 11 i.e. the Mukhiya of the Gram Panchayat. As far as the allegation that the respondent no. 14 is the cousin daughter-in-law of this Mukhiya, this Court does not think it very relevant as the cousin daughter-in-law cannot be held to be dependent on respondent no. 11. This aspect of the matter has been covered by a judgment delivered in CWJC No. 12911 of 2007 (Sunita Kumari Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). It has been submitted that the procedure has not been properly followed, the proper forum to raise such grievances would be before the District Magistrate, Gopalganj. If such a grievance is raised by the petitioner before the District Magistrate, Gopalganj, and the District Magistrate, Gopalganj is prima facie satisfied that the allegations are correct, then he should pass an appropriate order after hearing the concerned parties. This writ application is thus, disposed of with the aforesaid direction. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)