IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Rev.(T) No.: 8 of 2008. Decided on: 29.10.2010. _____________________________________________________ H.P. State Electricity Board and another. … Petitioners. Versus R.L. Kashyap. … Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners : Ms. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Dharamvir Sharma, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): The respondent/petitioner in the Original Application bearing No.717 of 1992 was sanctioned six advance increments on February 10, 1981, raising his pay to Rs.240/- from Rs.180/- with effect from November 10, 1966. The Board after a long period of 11 years, on the basis of audit para withheld an amount of Rs.25,000/- from the D.C.R.G. of the petitioner. The learned Tribunal quashed the office order issued by the H.P.S.E.B., dated 22nd January, 1992 and consequently directed the Board to pay an amount of Rs.25,000/- withheld from the D.C.R.G. of petitioner, Shri R.L. Kashyap and also to pay him the monthly pension of 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - Rs.1935/-. The Board was further directed that the amount of less pension paid to the petitioner w.e.f. February 26, 1992 be also released in his favour, within a period of one month. 2. Board has preferred this review petition against the judgment rendered by the learned Tribunal, dated 14th October, 1992. Learned counsel for the review petitioner has failed to point out any error apparent on the face of the record. Moreover, the learned Tribunal has stayed the operation of judgment dated 14th October, 1992 on December 30, 1992. 3. Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, the review petition is dismissed. Interim order dated 30th December, 1992 is vacated. The Board is directed to release the monetary benefits as directed vide judgment dated 14th October, 1992, within a period of one month after the production of certified copy of this judgment, with interest at the rate of 9% per annum. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 29, 2010. (sck).