In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. C.W.P.No. 6447 of 2006 Date of Decision: 13.11.2006 Dines Kumar & Others …Petitioners. Versus State of Haryana & Others ...Respondents. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI Present: Mr.G.P.Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG Haryana for the respondents JUDGMENT M.M.KUMAR, J.(ORAL) The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the advertisement dated 8.2.2006 (Annexure P1) advertising 23 posts of Signallers has been withdrawn and, therefore, the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. However, the State counsel expresses his ignorance about the afore-mentioned facts. In view of the above, we dismiss the petition as having been rendered infructuous with a liberty to file a fresh one, if there C.W.P.No.6447 of 2006 2 is any deficiency in the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. (M.M.KUMAR) Judge November 13, 2006 (M.M.S.BEDI) dkb Judge