IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-26097 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 7.9.2011 Usha ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Mr.Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The petitioner impugns the order dated 8.3.2011 by which her application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to summon Sohna as accused in the case has been declined. The trial Court while declining the prayer of the petitioner has noticed that no witness has stated that Sohna had given kick blow to the complainant even though the complainant stated so. This led to the conclusion by the learned trial Court that the material on record was not sufficient to result in conviction Sohna who was sought to be summoned. On due consideration of the matter, I am in agreement with the observations of the learned trial Court which has exercised its discretion judiciously. Section 319 of the Code undoubtedly gives Crl.Misc.No.M-26097 of 2011 (O&M) -2- power to the Court to summon a person to stand trial provided the material on record is sufficient to lead to a suspicion of the involvement of the accused and which material is sufficient in order to sustain a reasonable doubt that if accepted it will lead to the conviction of the accused. There being a complete ambiguity regarding the role of Sohna, who was sought to be summoned as accused, the Court has rightly exercised its power. No ground to interfere. Dismissed.. 7.9.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss