IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) No. 12425 of 2008 Decided on: 15.6.2011 Sunder Lal …Petitioner Versus H.P. Housing & Urban Development Authority Nigam Vihar and another …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Sood, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. L.N. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. . . None for respondent No. 1. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Rajeev Sood, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since his client stands promoted, the present petition is rendered infructuous due to subsequent developments. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge June 15, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?