IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-8372 of 2010 Date of decision : 06.09.2011 Sohan Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. B.B.S. Teji, Sr. DAG, Punjab Mr. Malkiat Singh, Advocate MAHESH GROVER, J. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to raise all the pleas before learned trial Court. He further confines his prayer only to the limited extent that the interim order dated 19.3.2010 vide which the petitioner was permitted to arrive in India and appear before the Illaqa Magistrate and was granted bail as an interim measure be, made absolute. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has appeared before the Illaqa Magistrate pursuant to the order dated 19.3.2010 and 8.4.2010 which was subsequent order and has been granted the necessary indulgence as directed by orders of this Court. Referring to that, he further states that he will continue to associate himself with trial. Crl. Misc. No. M-8372 of 2010 2 In view of the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the pleas that the petitioner wishes to raise before the Court of competent jurisdiction at the appropriate stage of the proceedings. Since he has also appeared before the Illaqa Magistrate and has been granted bail, the same shall enure to him during the subsistence of the proceedings pursuant to the said FIR subject to the condition that he shall continue to associate himself with the trial Court and comply with any of the conditions that may have been imposed or may be imposed by learned Court below. (MAHESH GROVER) 06.09.2011 JUDGE reena