IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11141 of 2007 Rekha Kumari, Wife of Munna Sahani, Resident of Village Mirzapur, P.S. Tajpur, District Samastipur. --------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The District Magistrate Cum-District-Officer, Samastipur. 3. The Child Development Project Officer (C.D.P.O.) Morwa Block of Samastipur District. 4. The District Welfare Officer, Samastipur. 5. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Songar, P.S. Tajpur, District Samastipur. 6. Kiran Kumari, W/o Deb Nandan Sahni of Gram Panchayat Indrawara, P.S. Morwa, Dist. Samastipur. ---------- Respondents ----------- 3 4.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows:- “1. That the petitioner, through the present writ application seeks for direction commanding upon the respondents by issuing a writ of mandamus or any other writ to select the petitioner for the post of Aanganwari sevika of Kendra No.40 of Songar Panchayat under Morwa Block of Samastipur District- as also to annul the recommendation of selection of respondent no.6 for the post of Aanganwari Sevika of said Anganwari Kendra No.40 being not eligible for the post and be further pleased to take suitable action against her for committing fraud in league with the respondents that be with cost and - 2 - exemplary cost to the petitioner.” Learned counsel for the petitioner at the out set would submit that it was due to inadvertence that the name of the respondent no.6 could not be mentioned in the cage column of this writ application and he, therefore, be allowed to implead the respondent no.6 as party to this writ application. In the opinion of this Court, when the issue with regard to any infirmity in the selection/appointment of the respondent no.6 is said to be still pending before the Collector of the district as would appear from Annexure-7 annexed to this writ application, this writ application is definitely premature. That being so, this application is being disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2, the District Magistrate-cum-District Officer, Samastipur to look into the grievance of the petitioner as raised in Annexure-7 to this writ application and pass an appropriate order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the concerned Anganbari Sevika who also has been appointed as also the representative of the concerned Gram Panchayat by a reasoned order within a period of six - 3 - months. With the aforementioned observations and direction, this application is disposed of. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)