IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38481 of 2009 1. PAPPU RAUT 2. Munn Raut …………Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.01.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the two petitioners in a Police case under Sections 307 and other provisions of the Penal Code is that they and the informant both belong to the same residential locality and there is a case and counter case (160/2007 and 161/2007) between them. The petitioners were not sent up for trial while othere3s were charged- sheeted, differing with which cognizance has been taken against them. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Sagir Alam, Judicial Magistrate, lst Class at Motihari in Motihari (T) PS Case No.160/2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Snkumar (Navin Sinha,J.)