1 A c 5 xN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BItASIitiR '(c.u.1' MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO. f Ll % [2004 ? APPELLANT /’Banshi Agrawal, $mg‘“ - km a Emlfi e S/o. Late Lajpat Rai, Aged 33 years, Occupation — Business, R/o. Qr. No. 55/6, Nehru Nagar (East), Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS Santosh Kumar alias Pappu, S/o. Shri Mannulal Verma, Aged 23 years, R/o. Village 85 P.O. Surdug, Tahsil 8L District Durg (C.G.) Commissioner, Workmen’s Compensation (Labour Court), Durg (C.G.) MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTION 3O OF WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION ACT 1923 ‘< Rain/ L x ’ / XI-HC-78 iPr r e§€nt — _ Shrl‘Ashmh Shnvastava, cc unsel fol‘ the appellant. Heard he matte1 1s llsted on defalult as pomted out v1de offlce note dated 10004 The rece1pt regardlng depos1t of the awarded amount has 0t baen flled Learned counsel for the structmns from the appellant m ' r not V315? a p r 3 m \ v ‘V ’Sd/a I I Dhn‘endi‘a M-is’h‘ l r Judge Rid ‘ WWMQwwl/gi ,20’0" appellant subtmts that he has no hether the amount has been depos1ted o of the subrmssmn of the counsel for the appellant the ppeal 1s chsmlssed for non comphance of the prowsmns under Sect1on O of the Workmen Compensatlon Act. . l _n m 6 ‘ T I w , l' , 'WW3H §¥ xix :xv $Wm 7, ‘l 10 04.2007 ' Appellant Banshi Agrawal S/o. Late Lajpat 33 Occupation — », . H Rai', Aged 33 years, Not -55/6, ff Business, R/o. Qrf -55/6, District Nehru Nagar (East), Bhilaj, V ‘ Durg (C.G.) Vs 1. ' Santosh Kumal allas Pappu S/o Aged 2o \ > Shrx Mannulal Verma, Aged P O , ; years, R/o Vlllage 85 P O Surdug, G ) , r Tahsxl 8a D1str1ct Durg (C ) ' 1 j 2. Comm1ss1oner ' v ’ Workmens Compensatwn (Labour I Court) Du1g (C G)