IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5641 of 2010 SUKHDEO SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 11.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that sale deed executed in favour of the informant was not genuine rather forged one without payment of any consideration money. That could be revealed only after recovery of the petitioner. When he was suffering from illness that was the occasion of committing such forgery by the informant and her husband. Petitioner filed a cancellation suit and to meet the old age expenses, transferred his share’s land which never constitutes any offence of cheating or committing forgery for rejection of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Ghosi (Okri) P.S. Case No. 213 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Jahanabad subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)