IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2678 of 2010 (O & M) Date of decision: 13.05.2010 The Association of Surgeons of India and another. ..Petitioners Versus Dr.Kuldeep Singh and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI a). Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? b). To be referred to the Reporters or not ? c). Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present:- Mr.Puneet Jindal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.S.S.Sobti, Advocate for respondent No.1. AJAY TEWARI J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed against that part of the order where the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC has been rejected. The application was filed on the ground that the Court at Ludhiana had no jurisdiction. The learned Trial Court has rejected this application. After arguing for some time, learned counsel are agreed that it should be clarified that the order passed on the application under Order 7 Rule 11 would not have any effect on a decision of the issue of jurisdiction, which may be considered after the evidence, etc. has been led. Consequently, even while dismissing this revision petition, it is declared that the impugned order would have no effect on issue of jurisdiction which would be decided independently. Consequently, this petition stands dismissed. No costs. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE May 13, 2010 sukhpreet