IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41662 of 2010 1. JAGARNATH YADAV 2. Parwati Devi 3. Bhim Yadav 4. Molari Devi ……………………………….Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 26.03.2011 Learned Counsel for the petitioners at the very outset submits that petitioner no. 3 has been taken into custody and this application has become infructuous with regard to him, which is accordingly dismissed. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners 1, 2 and 4 and the learned counsel for the State. The submission on behalf of petitioner no. 4 in a Police case under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Penal Code is of her being a young unmarried girl, sister of the husband, has been implicated merely because of her relationship with no allegation. The submission on behalf of petitioner no. 2, the mother-in-law is also of generalized allegations and the statement at the Bar that the husband of the victim is already in custody. Considering the general nature of the allegations against them being ladies, let petitioners 2 & 4, above named, surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Bettiah in Bagaha PS Case No. 403 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The application is rejected in so far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned. Any application for regular bail on behalf of petitioner No. 1 shall be considered by the court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. Snkumar/ (Navin Sinha,J.)