IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.987 of 2010 Smt.Archana Das Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 02/ 24th June 2011 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents. The grievance of the appellant is that the nominee of the policy holder has received money of the policy and has not distributed to all the successors as per Hindu Succession Act. The dispute falls totally within the purview of private law and private law remedy is the only source available to the appellant. Appellant cannot be invoked public law remedy by filing a writ petition under Article- 226 of the Constitution of India. We are also not inclined to interfere with the judgment of the learned single Judge, hence the appeal is dismissed. perwez (Prakash Chandra Verma, J.) (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)