IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.3314 of 2003 Between: Goli Ramesh S/o Dasharatham, R/o Sulthanabad Village and Mandal, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Prohibition & Excise Superintendent Karimnagar District. 2 The Commissioner of Prohibnition & Excise, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus: i) declaring the action of the Respodnnet No.2 vide Lr. Cr. No. 1141/2003/CPE/G4, dated 4-2-2003 and the consequential order of the Respondnet No.1 in Rc. NO. 1251/2002/P&Ex/A9, dt 15-2-2003 as arbitary, illegal and without jurisdiction and consequently set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner :MR.A.SUDERSHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.3314 of 2003 ORDER: When the matter has been taken up for hearing on 31-03-2008, none appeared for the petitioner and as such, the matter has been posted “for dismissal”. Today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing, neither learned counsel for the petitioner is present nor is there any representation on his behalf. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 15-04-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RAGHU}