CWP No.22353 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. DATE OF DECISION: 15.12.2010 Parent Teacher Association of G.S.S. School ...Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI PRESENT: Mr.H.S.Sullar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.RD Sharma, DAG, Haryana Permod Kohli, J. (Oral) Notice of motion to respondents no.1 to 4 only. Mr.RD Sharma, DAG, Haryana who is present in Court has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents no.1 to 4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of at motion stage itself. Petitioner claims to be a Parent Teacher Association of G.S.S. School, Village Thamber, Tehsil and District Ambala. This petition has been filed seeking a direction not to re-engage respondents no.5 and 6 who were Guest teachers of G.S.S.S. Village, Thamber, Tehsil and District Ambala. It is alleged that these respondents were involved in case of one girl of the said school and an enquiry was held on the complaint and the services of the said respondents were terminated. It is further stated that these teachers are being considered for re-engagement as guest teachers. This petition has been filed seeking a direction not to re-engage respondents no.5 and 6 and CWP No.22353 of 2010 2 to initiate action against them. The petitioner placed on record copy of enquiry report (Annexure P-3) conducted by the then District Education Officer, Ambala. I have perused the enquiry report. The Enquiry Officer has not indicted respondents no.5 and 6. Rather it has come on record that there was some problem in the village and also in the school amongst teachers/residents which seems to have caused some unfortunate incident in the school. However, there is nothing on record to indicate and nor in the enquiry report that private respondents were in any manner found guilty of any misconduct. It has also not come on record that services of the private respondents were terminated on account of any allegation. In any case the petitioner has made representation (Annexure P-5) to the Director School Education, Haryana i.e. respondent no.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if respondents are directed to decide the representation. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner on its merits impartially without being influenced by any of the parties, within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is received by the competent authority. Needless to say in the event the claim of the petitioner is rejected, it shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 15.12. 2010 MFK CWP No.10585 of 2010 3