IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SA No.232 of 2004 CHANDRA DEO SINGH & ORS Versus DULARI KUER & ORS ----------- 04/ 15.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for plaintiff-appellant-appellants. In a suit for declaration of plaintiffs’ title and also for declaration that defendants have no right to grab plaintiffs’ land after cutting western Aal of plaintiffs and also for restoration of plaintiffs’ possession, both the learned courts below have concurrently found that defendants had proved continuous possession over the land in question for much more than twelve years to the knowledge of plaintiff-appellants. It was also held that plaintiff-appellants during the aforesaid period had never raised any objection before the proper authority challenging either the possession of the defendants or preparation of the rent roll. It was also found that the title claimed by plaintiff-appellants has also not been proved. This Court does not find any illegality in the concurrent findings of fact of both the learned courts below nor does it find any substantial question of law involved in this appeal, which is, accordingly, dismissed. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )