IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.12611 of 2011 HARKHU SINGH & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 25.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State as well as informant. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under sections 467, 468, 471, 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioner no. 1 to have got the mutation made in connivance with the Revenue Authority with regard to the land of the informant. On being challenged, the mutation order was subsequently cancelled. It appears that the petitioner no. 1 sold the land in favour of Rakesh Kumar, petitioner nos. 2 and 3 were made the witnesses to the sale deed, whereas petitioner no. 4 is the deed writer. The purchaser of the land Rakesh Kumar has been granted anticipatory bail vide Order dated 18.03.2011, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4430 of 2011. Learned Counsel for the informant submits that in a 144 Cr. P.C. proceeding, informant has admitted the tile of the petitioner no. 1. Considering the nature of accusation relating to title 2 dispute, let the petitioners, namely, Harkhu Singh, Ajeet Singh, Anuj Singh @ Anuj Prasad and Vidya Bhushan Prasad, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Punpun P. S. Case No. 95 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Masaurhi subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. SKM (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)