IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 2ND APRIL 2009 / 12TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 10886 of 2009(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.N.RADHAKRISHNAN VILLAGE MAN,TALUK OFFICE, MEENACHAL, KOTTAYAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.D.KISHORE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR LAND REVENUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURMAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.10886 of 2009 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd April, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner is presently working as a Villageman in Taluk Office, Meenachal, Kottayam district. The main grievance raised by the petitioner is that even though he has entered in service in the year 2002, he is not granted any promotion to the post of Village Assistant/Lower Division Clerk so far. It is submitted that in spite of issuance of various orders, referred to in the Writ petition , a quota is yet to be fixed. 2. The petitioner contends that in the earlier judgment of this Court produced as Exhibit P9 it was declared that as the respondents have not challenged the validity of the Special Rules, they are entitled only to the quota reserved for them in the Special Rules, as amended from time to time. It is, therefore, pointed out that in the light of the declaration made in Exhibit P9, the petitioner has approached the Land Revenue Commissioner by filing Exhibit P10 representation. Along with Exhibit P10, he has produced all the documents in support of WP(C).10886/09 2 his claim. It is pointed out that the directions in Exhibit P9 will have to be implemented to give reliefs to persons like petitioner. 3. Therefore, will be a direction to the second respondent to consider the matter in accordance with law, in the light of the judgment, Exhibit P9 of the Division Bench of this Court and in accordance with the principles laid down therein. The same shall be done, after hearing the petitioner or any other affected parties, within five months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE vgs.