THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4966 of 2010 ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The petitioner who is the plaintiff files this Revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking to assail the correctness of the order, dated 05.10.2010, passed in I.A.No.284 of 2010 in O.S.No.1210 of 2005 on the file of the II Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The Court below did not find in favour of the petitioner and dismissed the said application, which was filed under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, mainly on the ground that the originals of the relevant documents Exs.A-8 and A-10 were not produced before the Court nor any steps are taken for the same, and therefore, any such exercise is vitiated. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and on perusal of the relevant material on record, especially in the absence of any appropriate steps being taken by the petitioner-plaintiff for production of the originals of the said documents, the purpose of invoking Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act does not arise and the Court below has rightly exercised its discretion and dismissed the said application. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is liable to be dismissed. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO 10th December 2010 DR