IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12683 of 2009 KABINDRA KUMAR SINGH, SON OF SHRI LAGAN DEO PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHAINPURA, P.O. CHANDPURA BHANGHA, POLICE STATION JANKI NAGAR AND DISTRICT PURNIA, BIHAR. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, THROUGH SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, BOARDER SECURITY FORCE, NEW DELHI. 3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, BOARDER SECURITY FORCE, 28 BN., B.S.F., DINAPUR, WEST BENGAL. 4. THE COMMANDANT/DEPUTY COMMANDANT, 28 BN, B.S.F. PATIRAM, P.O. ATRAI, DINAPUR(WEST BENGAL). 5. THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER(GRC), NINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, DIRECTORATE GENERAL, B.S.F., PAY AND ACCOUNTS DIVISION, PUSHPA BHAWAN, MADANGIR, NEW DELHI-62. ----------- 03. 15.07.2010 In view of the statements made in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents that petitioner was enrolled as Constable in the BSF on 20.3.1991 suffered redness, diminished vision in both eyes in August and October, 1995 as also Glaucoma on 11.12.1997 was allowed to continue in service till he completed ten years of service, whereafter he was boarded out on medical grounds and he is being paid pension admissible as per the Rules. The prayer to grant further pension in terms of the provisions contained in the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunity, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 does not appear to be made out as petitioner never suffered any injury in his eyes. In the circumstances, in the light of the averments made in the counter affidavit, the writ application is disposed of. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.) 2