1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Ninth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14453 of 2011 KARUPPASAMY ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.7 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERIAYUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT IN CR.NO.119 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate For Respondent : MR. K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime NO.119 of 201 on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 147, 341, 294(b), 323, 324 of the Indian Penal Code, r/w Section 4 of TNPPDL Act, the petitioner is before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2.The petitioner herein is the seventh accused in Crime NO.119 of 2011. According to the case of the prosecution, the petitioner hails from A.Paraipatti Village, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District. The de-facto complainant is the driver of a bus plying in the said route. On 17.04.2011, since the de-facto complainant did not stop the bus at the bus stop properly, the villagers got enraged and it is alleged that they attacked the driver with hands. The petitioner was also in the crowd. It is further alleged that the glass fitted to the bus worth Rs.18,000/- was damaged. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would deny the above allegations. He would submit that simply because the petitioner hails from the said village, he has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offence. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.Having regard to the nature of crimes said to have been committed by the petitioner, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, but with conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate NO.II, Usilampatti, executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police for a period of eight weeks every day at 10.30 a.m., without fail. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. sd/- 09/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, USILAMPATTI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI 3 THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE, PERIAYUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate SR.No.38599 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14453 of 2011 Date :09/11/2011 TR :10.11.2011: 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/