IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 22ND MAGHA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 91 of 2010(S) ------------------------------------------ THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.30166/2009 DTD. 28/10/09. .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------- ARUN KUMAR.A, AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.LATE APPUNNI, LAKSHMI NIVAS, KOSATHARA, CHITTOOR P.O., PALAKKAD. BY ADV. MR.K.REGHU KOTTAPPURAM. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. MR.RAJAGOPAL, AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENJIPPALAM, KOZHIKODE DIST., MALAPPURAM. 2. MR.NARAYANAN, AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENJIPPALAM, KOZHIKODE, DIST. MALAPPURAM. R1 & R2 BY MR. P.C. SASIDHARAN, S.C, CALICUT UTY., THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ---------------------------- Cont.Case (C)No.91 of 2010 ---------------------------- Dated 11th February, 2010 JUDGMENT The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though belatedly, the petitioner's answer scripts have been revalued. In the light of the said submission, I am of the opinion that no further orders are called for in this contempt case. It is accordingly closed. P.N.RAVINDRAN Judge TKS