IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37266 of 2009 CHANDRA KANT SHARMA SON OF LATE RAM BILASH SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28/01/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 328, 307, 379, 411, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8/22 of N.D.P.S. Act. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 22.6.2006 and the report of the trial court reveals an unfortunate situation in which the trial court seems to have completely neglected the case and not proceeded in the manner as required, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Muzaffarpur Rail P.S. Case No. 94 of 2006, T.R. No. 39 of 2008 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner and since the petitioner is of Muzaffarpur while the trial is going on in Muzaffarpur, it will be desirable that the petitioner furnish a local surety who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be 2 released on bail. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)