IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4351 of 2010 1. SABITA KUMARI W/O SHIVJEE PANDEY R/O VILL.- PHULWARIA, P.S.- KUCHAIKOTE, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GOPALGANJ, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KUCHAIKOTE-BLOCK, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 5. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, KUCHAIKOTE- BLOCK, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 6. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ- SANGWADIH KUCHAIKOTE-BLOCK DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 7. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ- SANGWADIH KUCHAIKOTE-BLOCK, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 8. THE DISTRICT TEACHER'S EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, GOPALGANJ THROUGH ITS SECRETARY 9. VIJAY KUMAR RAI S/O UDAY RAI R/O VILL.- CHAILAWA, P.S.- GOPALPUR, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ ----------- 2 20.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. There is clear assertion on behalf of learned Senior counsel representing the petitioner that the District Employment Appellate Authority, Gopalganj neither issued any notice to the present petitioner nor was she made a party to the case and heard on the issue. The decision rendered behind her back is no decision in the eye of law. On the limited submission having been made, the matter is remitted back to the District Employment Appellate Authority, Gopalganj that on an application being made by the petitioner along with a copy of this order, the fact will be verified and if the assertion is correct then they would be obliged to hear the petitioner and a fresh order is required to be passed. If the submission made or the fact is found to be otherwise then the impugned order may not be interfered with. - 2 - This writ application is disposed of with a direction that adjudication be made in the light of above within a reasonable time frame from the date the petitioner moves to the authority. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)