WP(C) 293/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the appoin tment of the respondent No. 4 as Fireman. According to the petitioner, he being a selected candidate with Roll No. 142 for the post of Fireman, he should have b een appointed instead of appointing the respondent No. 4. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondents the real position has been exp lained. It has been stated that the petitioner was a candidate for the post of F ireman in the District of Cachar whereas the respondent No. 4 was a candidate fo r the District of Dhemaji. The petitioner was allotted Roll No. 142 for the Cach ar District. Similarly the respondent No. 4 was also allotted Roll No. 142 for D hemaji District. It is because of the similar Roll No., the petitioner is confus ed that in fact he was selected in the said Roll No. As explained in the said af fidavit, the fact of the matter is that the petitioner with Roll No. 142 in the Cachar District could not qualify, he having secured 36 marks as against the qu alifying marks 41. On the other hand, the respondent No. 4 with Roll No. 142 in the Dhemaji District could qualify in the selection. The aforesaid stand of the respondents has not been denied by the petitioner by filing any affidavit in reply. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the writ petition and according ly, it is dismissed.