IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Revision No.1028 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 25, 2006 Sham Lata @ Sunita and others ...PETITIONERS VERSUS State of Haryana and another ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Munish Garg, Advocate, for Mr.N.K.Sanghi, Advocate, for the petitioners. ... Counsel for the petitioners informs that since the main case has been decided by the trial Court, therefore, this revision petition challenging the summoning order passed under Section 319 Cr.P.C. has become infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. September 25, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE