HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAIVI: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J. Appellants Claimants Misc. Appeal (Cl No. 135 of 2011 1. Nasima Khatun, aged about 34 years, wife of late Riyaz Khan 2. Aamir Khan, aged about 16 years, S/o late Riyaz Khan 3. Samina Khatun, aged about 15 years, D/o late Riyaz Khan 4 Aasna Khatun, aged about 14 years, D/o late Riyaz Khan 5 Sameer Khan, aged about 12 years, S/o late Riyaz Khan 6 Shamsher Khan, aged about 10 years, S/o late Riyan Khan 7 Kamran Khan, aged about 4 years, S/o late Riyaz Khan 8 Aashiyana Khatuun, aged about 5 years, D/o late Riyaz Khan 9 Reshmi Khatun, aged about 2 years, D/o late Riyaz Khan 10 Johra Khatun, aged about 55 years, wife of Kakbul Khan Minor through natural guardian mother Nasima Khatun R/o Village Indira- Nagar, Bakimongra; Katghora, Distt Korba Respondents VERSUS -- 1. Arjun Patet aged about 52 years, S/o Bhikhari Patel, R/o Qtr No.B140, ,,, ? ^yv"~ ^. , .y" ^^%. "%.. '•^^:,^ Delwadih Colony, Katghora Driver / NA -1 2. Ifco Tokio General Insurance Co Insurance Co/NA2 Through Division Office, GE Road, Raipur Appeal under Section 173 ofthe Motor Vehicle Act Present: None for the appellants. Shri Amrito Das, counsel for respondent No.2. ORDER (12th July, 2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appellants. ? 2) As there is no representationon behalf of the appellants, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge ""'"} / subbu 'I^