IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.836 of 2008 RATAN KUMAR JAISWAL SON OF SRI BASUDEO PRASAD JAISWAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KURSELA, POLICE STATION- KURSELA, DISTRICT KATIHAR AT PRESENT MOHALLA GOPALPUR, POLICE STATION- BHAGALPUR, DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. MAKHRU MANDAL @ RAJ KUMAR MANDAL SON OF LATE TILA MANDAL 3. CHANGURI MANDAL SON OF O.P. MANDAL 4. PRAMOD MANDAL SON OF MAKHRU MANDAL@ RAJ KUMAR MANDAL 5. O.P. MANDAL SON OF KALLAR MANDAL ALL RESIDENTS OF KURSELA, P.S.- KURSELA, DISTRICT- KATIHAR For the petitioner : Mr. Bhushan Prasad, Advocate For the O.P. : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ----------- 3 15.09.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner, the opposite parties and the State. Petitioner is the informant. He is aggrieved by the order dated 15.05.2008 passed by learned Additional District Judge in ST No. 962/06 whereby the accused have been tried and acquitted of the charge punishable under Section 366A and 376 IPC. Two sisters are said to have been kidnapped by the two boys. Two boys along with their fathers faced the trial. Learned Trial Court on a consideration of the materials brought on record found that there was inordinate delay in lodging the FIR. The Doctor did not find any injury on the person of the victim. The prosecutrix did not allege before the I.O. that she was raped. The age of the two girls have been assessed close to 18 years. It has also been found that one of them was carrying pregnancy. Taking all these factors into consideration, 2 the order impugned has been passed. The view so taken by the learned trial court based on evidence on record cannot be said to be wholly erroneous. The impugned order does not require any interference. There is no merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )