1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8573 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 10947 OF 2009 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. DATED : 26.11.2010 1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 184 days in filing the Second Appeal. 2. Heard learned Counsel for the applicants and learned Counsel for the respondents. The reasons given for the delay are that the applicant was not well, so also due to financial crunch he could not prefer the appeal. The learned Counsel for the respondents resists the application on the ground that no sufficient cause is stated. The reasons stated are not convincing and as such the application should be dismissed. 3. The matter involved valuable 2 rights of the applicants in the immovable property. The delay that has been caused, has been explained. There is no reason to disbelieve the statement of the applicant that he was not well. 4. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The delay is condoned. [S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J.] snk/2010/NOV10/ca8573.09