..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.480 OF 2007 M/s.Good Year South Asia Tyres Pvt.Ltd., ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents. .. Mr.Abaad Ponda, Adv. i/b. M/s.Mulla & Mulla, for the Applicant. Smt.V.R.Bhosale, APP, for the Respondents. .. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : MARCH 28, 2008. DATED : MARCH 28, 2008. DATED : MARCH 28, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. Process came to be issued against the applicant under Section 33(i) of the Standard Weights & Measures Act (E), 1985 read with Rule 10(1), 6(1) read with Rule 12(4) of the Rules of Packaged Commodities Act, 1977. The said process came to be issued by the Additional CMM, Mazgaon, Mumbai in Court Case No.14/SS/2004. 3. The applicant challenged the order issuing process before the Sessions Court by way of a Revision Application. However, as there was delay ..(2).. in preferring the Revision Application, Miscellaneous Application No.311 of 2006 came to be preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay. By order dated 28.11.2006 the learned Additional Sessions Judge rejected the application for condonation of delay. 4. Various grounds have been raised in the present application showing that there was sufficient cause made out for condonation of delay. The learned APP who represents respondent Nos.1 & 2 states that she has no objection to the delay being condoned and the revision application being disposed of on merit by the learned Sessions Judge. In view of the statement made by the learned APP and in the interest of justice, delay caused in filing the revision application before the Sessions Court is condoned. The said revision application to be heard and disposed of by the learned Sessions Judge on merits after hearing necessary parties. 5. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. ..(3).. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)