1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.373 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2491 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2934 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2435 OF 2005 Krishna Deu Bhoir Eknath Shivram Pitambare Vishwanath Keru Pitambare Jaywant Baliram bhoir Appa Tukaram Bhoir Santosh Kachru Bhoir Dilip Krishna Bhoir Shripat Kachru Bhoir Barku Sukrya Bhoir .. Applicants Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.386 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2053 OF 2005 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2492 OF 2005 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4006 OF 2005 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4708 OF 2005 WITH 2 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3315 OF 2005 Keshav Bendu Pitambare Sopan Walku Bhoir Sandeep Mangal Tarmale Pramod Balu Vishe Kamlakar @ Kamlya Balu Vishe Balaram Kachru Bhoir Kaluram Mangal Tarmale .. Applicants Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.387 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2784 OF 2005 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2963 OF 2005 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2964 OF 2005 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2966 OF 2005 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2967 OF 2005 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2968 OF 2005 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2970 OF 2005 Raghunath Kachru Bhoir Ashok Krishna Bhoir Deepak Mangal Bhoir Ramesh Tukaram Bhoir Bhaskar Shirpat Bhoir Dyaneshwar Walku Bhoir Pandit Keru Pitambare Malhari Kaluram @ Baliram Bhoir Bharat Sambhu Bhoir .. Applicants 3 Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondents Mr.N.N.Gavankar with Arfan Sait for applicants Mr.S.S.Pednekar, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 8th November 2006. P.C. . On 29th June 2006 in all these applications which are preferred for modification of conditions while granting bail, an ad-interim order was passed by this Court relaxing the condition of not to enter Thane Dist. The condition was relaxed by this order for a period of 60 (sixty) days to be calculated from 23rd June 2006. 2. The matters were placed before me on 11th September 2006 and the ad-interim order was 4 extended in the light of the ensuing festival. 3. Applications are listed before me for hearing and final disposal. 4. Mr.Gavankar states that during this period viz., from 23rd June 2006 till date, the condition imposed not to enter Thane Dist. has been relaxed but no untoward incident has been reported. He, therefore, prays that the ad-interim orders be made absolute. 5. Learned A.P.P. has not filed any reply to these applications. I.O. is present in Court. 6. In all fairness it is pointed out that the applicants have not misused the liberty granted by this Court, but some chapter proceedings have been initiated. 5 7. In my view, appropriate course would be to dispose of these applications by directing that the order passed by this Court on 29th June 2006 shall continue to operate till 31st March 2007. Needless to state that if within this period applicants are found to have misused the liberty and permission granted by this Court, it would be open for the prosecution to bring the said fact to the notice of this Court by placing relevant material and thereupon this Court shall consider the same in accordance with law. 8. Needless to further state that the applicants shall be at liberty to take out fresh application for relaxation of the condition not to enter Thane Dist. imposed upon them for such period as they may be advised and all contentions in that behalf of both sides are expressly kept open. Needless to state that despite applicants being permitted to enter Thane Dist., they shall continue to abide by the other conditions imposed 6 including attending and reporting to Kalyan Taluka Police Station. 9. Application disposed off with liberty as above. 10. All concerned including police authorities to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)