THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA W.P.No.24126 of 2009 11th November, 2009 Between :- Dasari Naganna .. Petitioner And The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad And 2 others .. Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA W.P.No.24126 of 2009 ORDER:- The matter is coming up for admission. 2. Heard Sri U.Suman, the learned Counsel representing writ petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj. 3. The Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent no.1 in issuing G.O.Rt.No.1487 Panchayat Raj and Rural Development (PTS.II.A) Dept. dt.20- 10-2009 as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in the post of Sarpanch, Payasampalli Gram Panchayat, Veerapunayunipalle Mandal, Kadapa District and pass such other suitable orders. 4. It is the case of the petitioner that APO, Technical Assistants and the Field Assistants have to continuously minor the work in the field and see that the rural labour working are given payments within time and also they have to verify whether the tractor are engaged properly and if silt is being deposing in SC/ST lands. The petitioner was elected as Sarpanch of Payasampalli Gram Panchayat, during the year 2006. Several further facts also had been narrated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. 5. In G.O.Rt.No.1487, dt.20-10-2009, the 1st respondent in para 8 observed as hereunder:- “Government after careful examination of the matter based in the available records, the Revision Petition filed by Sri Dasari Naganna, Sarpanch, Payasampalli Gram Panchayat, Kadapa District, is hereby disallowed duly vacating the stay orders issued in the Govt.Memo., dt.17-1-2009.” 6. Except these reasons, no further reasons had been recorded. It is needless to say that this is a statutory revision and the 1st respondent while disposing of the statutory revision is expected to record appropriate reasons. In the light of the facts and circumstances, the impugned Order is hereby set aside and the matter is remitted to the 1st respondent to dispose of the revision within the period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Till appropriate orders are made in the revision by the 1st respondent, let the petitioner be continued as Sarpanch. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to the extent indicated above. No order as to costs. _________________ Justice P.S.Narayana 11th November, 2009 smr