Civil Revision No. 2038 of 2010 -1- ***** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2038 of 2010 Date of decision : 18.5.2010 Hazara Singh and another ....Petitioners Versus Harpal Singh ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. S.S.Swaich, Advocate for the petitioners. S. D. ANAND, J. There is no controversy about the inter-se relationship of the parties as landlord-tenant. The petitioners-landlords filed a petition for ejectment of the respondent-tenant from the tenanted premises. The averment made in the course thereof was that, in pursuance of the tenancy rent at the rate of Rs.6500/- for the shop and Rs.2500/- for the store was payable on monthly basis. The rent was exclusive of the electricity and water charges. The petitioners- landlords applied for the assessment of provisional rent on the basis of aforementioned rate. The plea was resisted by the tenant who averred that rent was payable at rate of Rs.1450/- for the shop and Rs.850/- for the store per month. The learned Rent Controller assessed the provisional rent at the rate of Rs.2300/- per month. Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioners, states that the petitioners would be content and interests of justice Civil Revision No. 2038 of 2010 -2- ***** would be served if a time bound disposal of the petition under reference is ordered by this Court. The petition shall stand disposed of accordingly with a direction that the learned Rent Controller shall dispose of the main petition itself within six months from today. The time bound disposal would also be in accord with the law laid down by this Court vide order dated 4.5.2010 granted in Civil Revision No.302 of 2010 (Sandeep Ghai Vs. Neeraj Malhotra). Disposed of accordingly. May 18, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE