... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.275 OF 2004 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.275 OF 2004 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.275 OF 2004 Smt. Jayashri Govind Ahankari ...Applicant Vs. Shri Govind Sharad Ahankari ...Respondent ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... Office Notes, Office Memorandum Office Notes, Office Memorandum Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and orders orders or directions and orders orders or directions and orders Registrar’s orders Registrar’s orders Registrar’s orders ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... Shri S. B. Shetye for the Petitioner. Shri V.V. Purwant for the Respondent No.1. Ms M.M. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : OCTOBER 28, 2005. DATE : OCTOBER 28, 2005. DATE : OCTOBER 28, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . For the reasons separately recorded in the judgment, following is the operative part of the order: : O R D E R : i) The impugned Judgment and Order dated 29th August, 2003 is quashed and set aside and Criminal Revision Application No.19 of 2003 is restored to file. ii) The parties are directed to appear before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri on 05th December, 2005 for fixing the ... 2 ... schedule of hearing of the Revision Application. iii) The learned Additional Sessions Judge will decide the Revision Application as expeditiously as possible and preferably on or before 31st March, 2006. iv) Revision Application will be decided on its own merits in the light of the observations made in this judgment. v) The contentions of the parties on merits of the Revision Application are kept open. vi) The amount deposited by the Respondent in the Trial Court will not be withdrawn by the Petitioner without prior permission of the Revisional Court. vii) Parties and the concerned Court to act upon an authenticated ... 3 ... copy of this order. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE