IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15161 of 2010 Date of Decision : August 25, 2010. New Dashmesh Workers Transport Co. .....Petitioner versus The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Bathinda .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.P.S.Bawa, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.H.S.Brar, Additional AG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.H.S.Brar, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter-reply from the respondent at this stage. The petitioner, who is a Transport Company, seeks a mandamus to direct the respondent to provide equal margin of timings on Faridkot-Bathinda via Baja Khana and Baja Khana to Barnala and back route. The petitioner also seeks a direction for finalization of time table of Salabatpura to Barnala and Bhadaur to Salabatpura, Baja Khana route and C.W.P.No .15161 of 2010 2 back for all the operators, holding valid permits for that route. In this regard, the petitioner is said to have approached the authorities vide representation dated 29.5.2010 (Annexure P-2), but no action appears to have been taken thereupon so far. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to the respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's afore-stated representation as per the Policy/Scheme by passing a speaking order as early as possible and preferably within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 25, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE