IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9753 of 2010 1. DEE KAY MOTORS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR RAJIV GUPTA, S/O SRI RAM PUKAR GUPTA, R/O C-302, HARI RADHA APPARTMENT,BORING ROAD, P.S. S.K. PURI,DISTRICT-PATNA. Versus 1. BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD,PATNA. 2. CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD,PATNA. 3. ELECTRICAL SUPERINTENT ENGINEER, P.E.S.U, PATNA. 4. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, DANAPUR. 5. ASSISTANT ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, DANAPUR SUPPLY SUB DIVISION,PATNA. ----------- 02. 11.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and for the Board. In view of the nature of the order proposed, the Court does not consider it necessary to take note of the facts of the case except to the extent relevant for disposal of the case so as not to prejudice the case of either party. The dispute relates to sanction load and alleged excess load found during inspection. Fresh bills have been raised. Issues have been urged that inspection was not done in presence of the petitioner etc. Learned counsel for the Board rightly points out that the petitioner has an option to file objections to the provisional assessment done in light of the excess load found, when the authorities are required to adjudicate issues in accordance with law and arrive at a final 2 assessment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the line remains disconnected. Nothing in the order shall prevent the Board from resuming supply, if the petitioner so requests upon conditions to the satisfaction of the Board, but in accordance with law. The writ application stands disposed in the aforesaid terms. It is expected that the Board shall act expeditiously in the matter both in the interest of the consumer as also its own revenues preferably within a maximum period of one month. The writ application stands disposed in the aforesaid terms. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)