/••ni n Versus 4 AT Mewa Lal Tandon S/o Late Vikram t)as Tandon, Aqed about 45 years Assistuit Oraftsman, Sub Oivision Office. Rural ^rvtc^s, Sub District- Enqineerinc Division-Mungeli, iii'aspur (C.e.) 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through ; Secretary Department of Water- Resources DK5 Bhawan, 'cipur- (C.-S.5 2. State of Madhya Pradesh Through ; Secretary Depcrtment of Water Resources Vallabh Bhawon, ihopal (M.P.) Offic® of Chief Engineer Woter Resources bepartment of Chhattisgarh, ftaipur 4. Panchayat A 6ramm Vikas Vighag Through : Secr-etary Saipur, Dlstt Raipur (C.6.) it Petition under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India I; nor Present : Mr. Viyek Rathore, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vinay Pandey, Pane! Lawyer for the State/respondents No. 1, 3 ir" In this petttion, the matter relates to aliocation of the petitjoner between »tate of Madhya Pradesh and State of Chhattisgarh on creation of the >tate of Chhottisgarh. This very issue wos considered in botch of fflattetf i.e. W.P. No. 445 of 2001 ffl.R. and and other connected matters which has been disposed of on / •U'4'.^IUU/. counsel appearinq for the parties .iointiy submits that the is squarely covered by the judgment cnd order dated 17.04.M07 ptssed by this Court in the case of B.R. Vs. ond athersorid other connected fflatters (Supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms and conditions. No order as to eosts. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subhssh