IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7037 of 2011 SIKANDAR GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.12575 of 2011 RINKU SINGH @ VIKASH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 18.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that the informant’s son was working in the Mobile shop of Sanjeev Singh, Rinku Singh and Bhola Singh. The son of the informant went missing who could not be located. Subsequently, it is alleged against the petitioner Sikandar Gupta that he used to threaten the informant’s brother. Subsequently one Santu Kumar Singh was arrested who in his confession named Pappu Yadav, Pankaj Yadav and Diilip Choudhary. Admittedly there is no eye witness to the occurrence. Subsequently, dead body was recovered and in case diary investigation has been recorded on 2 20.08.2010 and to that extent accusation was found true only against Santu Kumar Singh. Considering the suspicion nature of accusation and circumstantial evidence, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Rupauli P.S. Case No. 11 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Purnea, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners will co-operate in investigation and non co-operation of petitioners will give liberty to the informant to file an application for cancellation of anticipatory bail of petitioners. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)