The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.33671 of 2011 Date: 23-12-2011 Between: M.Ludhiya Rani ..... Petitioner AND 1.The Appellate Authority/Joint Director (Admn.) O/o. Commissioner of Survey and Land Records, Survey Bhavan, Narayanguda, Hyderabad and another. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.P.Elamadhar Counsel for the Respondents No.1: AGP for Revenue Counsel for respondent No.2: --- The Court made the following : Order: Feeling aggrieved by Order, dated 24-02-2010, of the first appellate authority i.e., respondent No.1 herein, confirming Order, dated 18-08-2009, of the primary authority i.e., respondent No.2 herein, declining to furnish photocopies of his OMR answer sheets in the first, second and third unit tests and final examination, the petitioner filed the present Writ Petition. At the hearing, Sri P.Elamadhar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, has not disputed that against the order of respondent No.1, his client has a further remedy of statutory appeal under Section 19 (3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (for short ‘the Act’). Ordinarily, when a person is provided with an alternative remedy, this Court does not entertain a Writ Petition filed bypassing the same. The petitioner has not assigned any reasons for filing this Writ Petition without availing the statutory remedy of appeal. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy of appeal under Section 19 (3) of the Act. As a sequel, WPMP.No.41869 of 2011, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 21st December, 2011 LUR