^Y^[^~ S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHAmSGARH) WRITPETITION(S)N0.3^&I /2009. PETITIONER: ishore Kerketta, son of Joseph Kerketta, Aged about 42 years, Lower Division Teacher, Primary School Mahkool Toli(Khatga), Block Duldula, District District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. '.f. versus Respondents ^Q/ ^ws^ T^^W y^^ ^''KS"'Y^ ^y ..-••" <^'..--"" ^".y y 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, Tribal welfare Department Ministry ' D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, C.G. '2, Comniissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. l^. 3. Block Education OfEcer, Block Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Joint Du-ector, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As mentioned in the Cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: As mentioned in the Cause title. 3. PARTICULARS OF THE CAUSE/ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE PETmON IS MADE/ SUBJECT MATTER INBRIEF. -z- ^s^ ^l — •II ^^K ^^^ O'/f] 'SST ^wM<i, ®Tfly'i6,facii'yy ^:.^2Ms.:..^.l 3n^I'<R^7 (•jqi^'tyl) ^nw'Hf^ si^ C-! ;f,Mt Shri C.J.K. Rao counsel for Shri^ShashankThakur PL fo mslKe Ct'Oi AS the out set counse! for thel wifhdraw this pefition with ,'iberty concerned. He also seeks a direc decidtngths repi-esenfation ofthe pel to him case of the petitioner Is squarf writ petition (S) No. 5257/2008. State counsel submits that ^ statement before this Court whether the order passed in aforementioned ifthe petltioner makes a representatij same shai! be decided strictiy in accoi| Accordingly, the petition Is di^ aToresaici. If the petitioner rnakes respondent wtthln a period of onem4 of thls order, the same is expected to| t>vo months from the date of its receiri it is made ciear that this Courtl the case and the authortties cot represenSation of the petitioner strictSy) ^P)feri):T WRff ^ ft^T <Rilt(K !he petitioner. the respondents/State. petitioner subrnits that he \vants fo a representation to the authority to She concerned authority for |itioner at an early date as accordins r^ly covered v/ith the order passed in fi this stage he can not make any i|;ase of the petitioner is covered with vijrit petition. However, he submits that i)3R to the concerned respondent, the jdance with !sw. ii^missed as withdrawn vMth Siberty as ^ representation tp^&e concerned m^nth from the date of receipt of copy |be decided.within a further period of |has not commented on the .Tierits of .hcerned are fres to decide the i in accordance v/ith law. sdf- vf^i, Tirei&riNtTU!;"""'*! imR'ira1—FS/95—11/2008—l,fl0,( ^ak^ w^ Q