CWP(T) No. 5653 of 2008 23.02.2011 Present: Mr. Surender Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents. It cannot be disputed at the bar that the impugned order dated 6.7.2000 (Annexure A-7) does not assign any reason. The order was passed on the representation (Annexure A-6) of the petitioner seeking modification of the order dated 11.5.2000 whereby fresh appointment as a conductor was given to him without giving the benefit of past service. 2. As prayed for, on this short ground alone the impugned order (Annexure A-7) is quashed with a direction to the respondents to decide the petitioner’s claim, in accordance with law, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. While taking such decision, keeping in view the attending circumstances, respondents shall take into account the prayer made by the petitioner for consideration of his request for compulsory retirement instead of fresh appointment. 3. Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned counsel submits that the authorities shall take the decision as expeditiously as possible. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. February 23, 2011 (PK)