AB 553/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C R SARMA Heard Mr. P K Talukdar, learned counsel appearing for the accused petiti oner as well as Mr. K Munir, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. Perused the Case Diary and the materials on record. This is an application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C seeking pre-arrest bail in favour of the petitioner, namely, Shri Debojit Pathak, in connection wi th Tihu Police Station Case No.90/2010, under Sections 366(A)/34 IPC. Having heard the learned counsel of both the parties and considering the materials so far collected by the Investigating Officer, more particularly, the statement of the victim girl made under Section 164 Cr.P.C., I find no sufficie nt reasons to extend the benefit of pre-arrest bail in favour of the accused pet itioner. Hence the application for pre-arrest bail is rejected. Return the Case Diary. The bail application is disposed of.