\, W.P.(aNo.14(»of2QW PefiBoner Sint. J. Sao, W/o &•. N.K. SaQ, agod daotit43 yaara, R?o BHaspur (C.G.) Versus Respondents :1. ^:. Thromh Swrelaiy, Edtnatot Dq»artment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Director <rf PuMic Instn.tcBon, Pension Bada, Ra4>ur^C.Gi^ Singte Bench: Hon'bte Mr. Ju^ce Satish K. As^oW. Mr. Kumaresh Tiwari. Advocats TorVt Pefltoner. Mrs. Anju Miiua, Dy. GoA Advocateforthe respcmdenfe/Slate. ORDER (Passedontefe 12th davofMaidi.2007) The peUBoner Is woridng as l-ecluiw in ft»gwwnmentaehool. <n U» course of his swvic^ s®Lecturer, the petitoner has ebtsBWd B£d. ExaBnin^oR Certificateon hisouni expei^asta fee year 94-9&^^. Leamed counsd appearing fw flie pefflfonw sutaite that the quetfen invohred, herein asto whether the teacher, wha (^alned BEd. Bcaminstlon Catificate wi his own expenses, Is aitWisd tolnro adwance inCT&fftfiflts. AccoRBng to teanred coureel for tte p^fcmer, ttw petWcBier is enWed to twoadwEincelnerementein view of tt»ttedstonrtWs Gourt in theess® of Yashwant Kumar Bharalwy Vs. Munieipal 6«poR^>KyDurg »Nt another ^2006 (^ MPJR-CG 9^. This Geurt in ttia case trf Y»hwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Munic4ial Corporsdion, Dur&anct am^iar (Supra), came to fte conclusion thatthe teachere, who had sbtained B. Ed. ®:T.I. ExarmreUon Ceitlficate on th^r own wpemsw, sse cove»ed by tRe ctroular<tertBd24.t2^8(Ann«xureP/7)issu«tbyth®Slate©weHmnsnt <rfMMlhyaPra(^h. B/- 4. Leamed counsel for the pefitoner further submtls that the fscts and quesUon of law involved in the present case are aiuarely couered by deciston of this Court in the case <rf YashwsBrt Kumar Bharachwtu \fe. Whinicipal Corporatton, Durg and another (Supra^, to whteh teainad counsel awiearing for the respondents fahty cwieedes wid agress ntt the averment made by leamed counsel appeariiigfer flte pet^ier. 5. Accordingly, the writ p^fion isanowedhitetmsofBieonlm'pMswltnthe case of Yastiwant Kumar Bharadwij Vs. Munldpal Corporaton, Duig and another (Supra), subject to vertflcatronof the fs^as towhefter the petitkmer has acquired B; Ed. Eiaminafion Ceifflkate on Ws own expenses as per the ciroulars dated 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1^ aml fuiftwr vrtt^iw he has been (»idtwo advance incremwds or not. Ne oider as to cosls. „—- Sd/- Satish K.Agnihottl Judge ^'