IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2008 / 14TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 16645 of 2008(F) --------------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- M/S.EMCO INTERNATIONAL, VARAVOOR, WADAKKANCHERRY, THRISSUR DT. REPRESENTED BY IT'S MANAGING PARTNER MR.ABDUL LATIF. BY ADV. SMT.K.LATHA RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM. 3. INSPECTING ASST.COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, THRISSUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI C.K. GOVINDAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- W.P.C. NO. 16645 OF 2008 F -------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th June, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court seeking to quash Exts.P1 assessment order and Ext.P3 revenue recovery notice. There are other reliefs also sought based on Ext.P2 Appeal filed. Having filed an Appeal, I feel that I need not go into the validity of Ext.P1 assessment order. Heard the learned Government Pleader also. The Writ Petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P4 stay petition in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. Till such time as a decision is taken, revenue recovery proceedings initiated against the petitioner pursuant to Ext. P3 will be kept in abeyance. Petitioner will produce a copy of this Judgment before the second respondent as soon as it is made available to it. K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk.