IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 22726 of 2002 Between: A. Munikrishnaiah, S/o. Chnna Swamy, TTD Service, Working in SPVS Temple, at Appalagunta, R/o. Appalagunta, Vadamalpet Mandal, Chittoor District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Endowments-III) Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Rep. by its Executive Officer, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 3 The Assistant Executive Officer (PAT), Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Tiruchanoor, Tirupati, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the issuance of the Memo. No. 73196/endts. III/A2/95, dated 2-6-2001 from the ﬁle of the 1st Respondent and proceedings Roc. No. B2/15513/92 dated 23-10- 2002 from the ﬁle of the 2nd Respondent and after perusing the same set aside the said orders by the declaring them as arbitrary, discriminatory and contrary to law and with all other consequential beneﬁts monetary and otherwise and with all other benefits, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.JAGAPATHI Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.P.SURESH REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled to declare the Memo No.73196/Endts.III/A2/95, dated 02-06-2001 and the consequential proceedings in Roc.No.B2/15513/92, dated 23- 10-2002, as arbitrary and contrary to law and to set aside the same. The Memo dated 02-06-2001 was issued by the Government rejecting the request of the Executive Oﬃcer/second respondent to ratify his action in having appointed the petitioner as Attender on regular basis. The proceedings dated 23-10-2002 was issued by the Executive Oﬃcer, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, cancelling the absorption that was made. This Court, by order dated 02-12-2002, granted interim stay and also directed the respondents to pay minimum scale of pay attached to the post of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that pursuant to the interim order the petitioner, while continuing in service, was being paid the minimum scale of pay attached to the post. Later on, during the pendency of the writ petition, he retired from service on 30-06-2006 on attaining the age of superannuation, therefore, she submits that no further orders need to be passed. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed, as no further orders are necessary. This order does not come in the way of the petitioner in claiming any other terminal beneﬁts as per the rules. No order as to costs. __________________ 03rd November, 2008 SKM