IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15200 of 2010 Vikram Singh Chahal Vs. State of Haryana & others Present: Mr.Narinder Singh Behgal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the persons selected did not have the requisite experience of two years. As per the conditions contained in the advertisement, two years practical experience in a factory of repute was the only requirement. The experience was to be gained after acquiring the minimum basic qualifications. Counsel for the petitioner has made reference to the information obtained by him by making an application under the Right to Information Act to point out that some of the persons selected do not have experience. I have perused the relevant record (Annexure P-9). The counsel has referred to the case of Shaliesh Ahlawat, who statedly has an experience from 15.7.1998 to 30.11.2000 and then from 20.4.2005 to 31.5.2008. How he would not fulfill the requirement of experience certainly is not made out? Thereafter the counsel has referred to the experience of Sudhir Kadyan, who had statedly served with a concern at Bangalore w.e.f. 1.3.2007. The counsel contends that this person would not have two years experience on the date of filing of the application. The counsel has referred to the case of Ashok Kumar Vs. Haryana Staff Selection Commission, 2002 (3) S.C.T. 572 to urge that eligibility was to be considered on the last Civil Writ Petition No.15200 of 2010 :{ 2 }: date fixed for receipt of applications. The decision in Ashok Kumar's case (supra) was in the background of note appended in the advertisement and experience was to be determined with reference to the last date fixed for receipt of application. There is no such stipulation in the advertisement in the present case so far as experience is concerned. This is only in regard to qualification. The ratio of the judgment would not strictly apply here. I am, thus, not inclined to interfere in exercise of writ jurisdiction. The same is accordingly dismissed. August 25, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE