1 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3558 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr. Rahul Kate for the petitioner. Mr. D.B. Lonkar for respondent no.1. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATE : 28th June 2010. P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. The impugned order is an interlocutory order and does not call for interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction. In any event, the impugned order does not affect the rights of the parties at all. The application made by the petitioner related to the computation of court fee stamp. If the Small Causes Court comes to the conclusion at trial that the court fee stamp is 1 improper, it would direct the recovery and would not pass the decree in favour of the respondent till the appropriate court fee stamp is paid. 4. With these observation, the writ petition is rejected. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)