IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DECEMBER 2009 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 32059 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SONEY SUNNY, THOTTICHIRAYIL HOUSE, VAIKOM P.O., KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.A.INEES RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM. SR. GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.K.S.MUHAMMED HASHIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 32059 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of the respondent in not considering Ext.P2 application filed by the petitioner for revision of his timings. According to the petitioner, after his timings were settled, the KSRTC has introduced many new services in the same route and other private services have also been introduced. The petitioner, therefore, submits that he is entitled to have his timings revised, for which he has filed Ext.P2 application. 2. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that many petitions for revision of timings are pending before the respondent and, therefore, the respondent is considering each application in accordance with the priority of receipt of applications. 3. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondent to consider Ext.P2 application also in accordance with the priority of receipt of the application. But I make it clear that I have not considered the eligibility of the petitioner for revision of timings and the respondent shall consider the question as to whether there are changed circumstances warranting revision of timings before proceeding further. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2