THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY C.R.P.NO.987 OF 2009 8th October, 2009. BETWEEN: J.RAMACHANDRU .. PETITIONER AND SOMA VENKATESWARLU .. RESPONDENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY C.R.P.NO.987 OF 2009 O R D E R: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 15.12.2008 passed in I.A.No.2045 of 2008 in O.S.No.10 of 2008 on the file of II Additional District Judge, Nalgonda, at Suryapet, whereby and where under the learned Additional District Judge ordered conditional attachment of the suit schedule properties. Notice before admission came to be ordered on 26.3.2009. Notice being served to the respondents through the counsel appeared on their behalf in the trial Court. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the order impugned in this revision. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that third party affidavit filed by the petitioner do not speak of petitioner contemplating to alienate the properties and in which case the very attachment of the property is illegal and improper. I have gone through the affidavit filed by the respondent. The relevant portion of the affidavit reads as under: “ …That on 8.12.2008 when I demanded for repayment, the respondent had bluntly refused to repay and when I expressed my intention of approaching the Hon’ble court for redress, he had threatened me by stating that he will alienate the schedule property and will cause obstruction for execution of money decree that is going to be passed in my favour. The details of my claim are fully engraved in the plaint and the documents are also filed herewith. As such I crave the leave of the Hon;ble Court to read the plaint and treat the documents as part and parcel of this affidavit.” A specific averment in the affidavit has been made by the respondent/plaintiff in the affidavit filed in support of the I.A.No.2045 of 2008 in O.S.No.10 of 2008. Therefore, I do not see any substance in the contention advanced by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. I do not see any valid ground to interfere with the order impugned in this revision. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. 8th October, 2009. (B.Seshasayana Reddy,J) tnb THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY C.R.P.NO.987 OF 2009 8th October, 2009.