1 916 caw 1180.11.doc srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1180 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9905 OF 2010 Madan Chandiram Somai .. Petitioner Vs. Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority and Anr. .. Respondents and Ashok Shamandas Narwani .. Applicant-Intervener Mr. P.D.Dalvi for Applicant-Intervener. Mr. J.S.Chandnani for the petitioner in WP no.9905 of 2010. CORAM: D.D.SINHA & K.K.TATED, JJ. DATE: 16TH JUNE, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant-Intervener, learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2. 2. Civil Application no. 1180 of 2011 is filed by the Applicant- Intervener seeking permission to intervene in the writ petition. 2 916 caw 1180.11.doc 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has objected for permitting the applicant-intervener to intervene in the writ petition. Be that as it may, the intervener even otherwise has a right of audience and in the instant case, it appears that the action initiated by the authority against the petitioner was on the basis of the complaint made by the applicant. In the circumstances, Civil Application is allowed. (D.D. SINHA, J.) (K.K. TATED, J.)