IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.10309 of 2010 Date of Decision : August 25, 2010. Rajnish Kumar Khan .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Mohit Jaggi, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks quashing of the Policy decision dated 1.6.2001 (Annexure P-2) in terms whereof the tenants have not been included amongst the beneficiaries of the `Rehabilitation Scheme' framed for the residents of village Lambian, Sector-69, S.A.S.Nagar, Mohali. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any ground to interfere with the Policy decision which is meant to compensate the land-owners/original residents of village Lambian whose lands/properties have been acquired for the development of certain urban areas of S.A.S.Nagar, Mohali. No meaningful argument could be C.W.P.No. 10309 of 2010 2 advanced as to how the subject policy does not satisfy the test of Article 14 of the Constitution when there cannot be any parity between a 'tenant' and the 'landlord'. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed, however, with liberty to the petitioner to seek redressal of his grievances before the respondent-authorities in accordance with law. Dasti. August 25, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE