IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 6100 of 2009 Between: Pathan Kareem Khan S/o. Ghouse Moinuddin Khan R/o.D.No. 8/96, Almaspet Road, Kadapa City & District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 Pathan Firoz Khan S/o. Ghouse Moinuddin Khan R/o. D.No. 8/96, Almaspet Road, Kadapa City & District. 3 Pathan Mustafa Ali Khan S/o. Ghouse Moinuddin Khan R/o. D.No. 8/96, Almaspet Road, Kadapa City & District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased toto call for the records in CCNo.252 of 2006 on the file of the Court of I Addl. Judicial first Class Magistrate, Kadapa and quash the same The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.V.R.REDDY KOVVURI, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the 1st Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER: The petitioner and the 2nd respondent are present in person and they are identified by Sri V.R. Reddy Kovvuri, learned counsel for the petitioner and heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also Sri A. Ramesh, learned counsel representing the learned Public Prosecutor for the 1st respondent. The criminal petition has been filed stating that the petitioner/de facto complainant/victim settled all the disputes and differences with respondents 2 and 3 through elders and compounded the offences and desires to quash the further proceedings in C.C. No.252 of 2006. The petitioner and the 2nd respondent reiterated the same before the Court also. A perusal of the record shows that the disputes are personal in nature not involving any public policy. Continuance of the prosecution will be futile. Hence, inherent jurisdiction of this Court should be exercised to put an end to vexing litigation. Therefore, the further proceedings in C.C. No.252 of 2006 on the file of the I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kadapa are quashed and the criminal petition is allowed accordingly. The parties are informed. _____________________ G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J Date: 07-08-2009 Svv ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.Two CC's to Public Prosecutor 2.Two CD Copies 3.One CC to Form-NIC-0GS/CRLP{MSN}