1 37 sa 212.10.doc K IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.212 OF 2010 Smt.Bayabai Santu Mohite deceased, Mahadev & Ors. ..Appellants. Vs. Gopalrao Abaji Injal & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. M.R.Suryawanshi for the appellants. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 14/12/2010. PC: 1 Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2 This appeal is directed against the concurrent findings of the fact recorded by the courts below in a suit instituted by the respondents-plaintiffs. The suit was instituted for possession of the immovable property on the basis of title. The plaintiffs have also prayed for injunction restraining the defendants from making any construction on the suit property. Both the courts below after having considered the entire evidence/material on record concurrently held that the respondents-plaintiffs have proved that they have given the suit land to the deceased-Santu as a 2 37 sa 212.10.doc gratuitous licencee with condition to vacate the same as and when required by the plaintiffs. As against this defendants claimed that they have purchased the suit property from the deceased Santu. The defendants have not produced any material/evidence on record in support of their claim. As against this both the courts have held that the plaintiffs have proved their case by leading sufficient evidence. Considering that there are concurrent findings of fact recorded by the courts below and that there is sufficient material on record to sustain these findings and considering that no substantial question of law either raised or involved in the appeal, the appeal deserves to be dismissed. Order accordingly. (D.B.Bhosale, J.)