IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1766 of 2008 PARMANAND SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 17-Sep-08 Heard the parties. Petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail was earlier dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 24.1.2006 passed in Cr.Misc.No.34939 of 2005. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for anticipatory bail on the ground that the complaint case in question has been filed by the Manager, Punjab National Bank, Baruna Branch only on the allegation that petitioner is not paying the loan amount and there is difficulty in recovery because the documents furnishing by way of guarantee are not regular and in order. It has further been submitted that on the basis of various annexures that sunsequently in a Certificate Case lodged by the bank the entire loan amount has been repaid by the petitioner to the satisfaction of the complainant, the Manager of Punjab National Bank, Baruna Branch. In view of the aforesaid submissions, this application is disposed of with a direction that if the petitioner appears before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at 2 Ara in connection with Complaint Case No.296 C/05 which has led to Narayanpur P.S. Case No. 16 of 2005 dated 28th of March, 2005 within four weeks along with proof that he has paid entire loan amount to the satisfaction of complainant- bank, in that event, the petitioner, Parmanand Singh would be enlarged on bail on the date of surrender itself on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with aforesaid P.S.Case, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)