IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No. 5791 of 2006 Date of decision : 3.11.2006. Jarnail Suingh .........Petitioner. Versus Jit Singh & Ors., ...........Respondents. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present : Mr.R.M.Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Cooner, Advocate for the Caveator/respondent. **** VINOD K. SHARMA,J.( ORAL ) The present revision petition has been filed against the rejection of the application moved by the petitioner claiming therein that an additional issue be framed and report be called from the trial Court.The said application has been dismissed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Ambala. It is not in dispute that the similar application was earlier moved by the petitioner before the trial Court and said application was rejected by holding that the issue sought to be raised would be covered under issue No.1. In view of this, there was no necessity for the petitioner to move the present application. The petitioner could challenge the finding on issue on all material facts. C.R.No. 5791 of 2006 [2] There is no error or illegality in the order which may call for interference by this court. Dismissed. October ,2006 ( VINOD K. SHARMA ) 'sp' JUDGE