IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 24TH MAY 2010 / 3RD JYAISHTA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 75 of 2010(S) ------------------------------------------- [THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.24294/2009 DATED 25/08/2009] .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE W.P: ------------------------------------------------------- RINTU TITUS @ JULIE REMYA, AGED 26 YEARS, D/O.C.TITUS, MULLASSERI VADAKKETHARA, KANNIMEL CHERRY, NOW RESIDING AT RINTU NIVAS, MEENATHU CHERRY, SAKTHIKULANGARA, KAVANAD, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.SURESH KUMAR. RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN THE W.P: ------------------------------------------------------------- T.P.SEN KUMAR IPS, AGED NOT KNOWN & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SRI. V.V. NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR, S.C, K.S.R.T.C. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/05/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J ........................................... Cont. Case.No. 75 OF 2010 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MAY, 2010 JUDGMENT According to the standing counsel for the first respondent, the award has been satisfied and the entire amount due to the petitioner has been paid. The counsel for the petitioner disputes this submission. According to the counsel for the petitioner, amounts are still due and payable to the petitioner as per the award of the MACT. It is submitted that MACT is yet to pass orders on this question. In the above circumstances, reserving the liberty of the petitioner to approach this court again, if it is found that the award of the MACT has not been fully satisfied, this contempt case is closed. Needless to observe that the tribunal may decide whether its award has been fully satisfied or not, within a period of two months. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE lgk