IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 5TH JULY 2011 / 14TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 15975 of 2011(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHEEBA IQBAL, AGED 40 YEARS, W/O.MUHAMMED IQBAL, PANTHUVALLIL HOUSE, MALAKUZHA, EANTHAYAR, KOKKAYAR, KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.A.T.ANILKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI. 2. TAHASILDAR, PEERUMEDU TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KOKKAYAR VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT. GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 15975 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- THE TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTERED SETTLEMENT DEED NO.1536/11 EXT.P2- THE TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT IN RESPECT OF EXT.P1 PROPERTY EXT.P3- THETRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT PASSED IN W.P.(C).20354/05 EXT.P4- THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE THIRD RESPONDENT FOR MUTATION OF THE PROPERTY IN HER NAME EXT.P5- THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER (True Copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).15975/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 5th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner is essentially that, orders have not been passed on Ext.P4 application made by her for mutation of the property mentioned therein. 2. Taking note of the limited nature of the relief pressed before this Court, the only order that is required to be passed in this writ petition is to direct the third respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 application, in accordance with the rules governing the same. This the third respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, along with the copy of the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs