IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 318 OF 2010 MR. COSME ROMALDO SILVEIRA ... Petitioner Versus VILLAGE PANCHAYAT OF CHICALIM, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mrs. A. A. Agni,Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Zeller D'Souza,Advocate for Respondent no.1. Mr. S. Padiyar, Advocate for Respondent no.2. Mr. P. Talaulikar, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent no.3. Coram:- A. S. OKA & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 29th July, 2010 P.C: We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. The grievance in the petition is that the first respondent Village Panchayat has not granted occupancy certificate to the Petitioner. The other grievance in the petition is that the inspection is not carried out by the second respondent. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the second respondent, on instructions, states that inspection has been carried out and a completion certificate has been issued in respect of the building in question. 3. We accept the aforesaid statement. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the first respondent states that if a completion certificate has been granted, the same may be made available to the first respondent. 5. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent, we need not keep the petition pending. Hence, we dispose of the petition by passing the following order: Order: a) We accept the statement of the second respondent that the completion certificate has been granted. A copy of the completion certificate be furnished by the second respondent to the first respondent within a period of one week from today. b) The application made by the petitioner for grant of occupancy certificate shall be decided by the first respondent within a period of four weeks from the date of which a copy of the completion certificate is received by the first respondent. A. S. OKA, J. F. M. REIS, J. ap/-