IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.852 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:29.03.2011. Rakesh Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Baldev Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Brijeshwar Singh Bhalla, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 02.06.2010 by which provisional rent has been assessed. The landlord had claimed the rent @ `1,824/- per annum, but as per rent note dated 16.01.1990 it was `1,872/- per annum, which was admitted by the tenant. The landlord claimed the rent since January 2005. The learned Rent Controller assessed the provisional rent `1,872/- per annum payable from 16.01.2005 alongwith interest as per the Rent Act with costs of `200/-. Although the present revision petition has been filed against the said order dated 02.06.2010 but the learned counsel for the petitioner has miserably failed to point out any defect in the impugned order for the purpose of interference by this Court. Hence, the present revision petition is found to be without any merit and the same is hereby dismissed in limine, however, without any order as to costs. March 29, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE