IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14756 of 2010 MAHESH CHANDRA SAHAY, son of Late Kailash Bihari Lal, resident of Village + Post- Baruna, P.S.-Buxar, District-Buxar, presently residing in the house of Usha Tetarwa at Ranighat Mahendru, P.S.-Sultanganj, District-Patna. --- Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through Secretary, Law Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. Bihar State Board of Religious Trust, Vidyapati Marg, Patna. 3. The Administrator-cum-Special Executive Officer, President, Bihar State Board of Religious Trust, Vidyapati Marg, Patna. --- Respondents ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Pradhan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh, Advocate For Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 : Mr Ganpati Trivedi, Advocate For the State : G.P. 17. ------------- 2. 9.9.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ganpati Trivedi, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Board as well as the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st of January, 2009 from the post of Typist under the respondent-Board, no retrial dues have been settled and paid besides some arrears of salary. Mr Trivedi, learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Board submits that the claim of the petitioner is not clear. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Administrator-Cum-Special Executive Officer, - 2 - President, Bihar State Board of Religious Trust, Vidyapati Marg, Patna (respondent no.3). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of his unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. However, if any of the claims or part of the claims is not being paid, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)