:1: :1: :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1104 OF 2006 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1104 OF 2006 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1104 OF 2006 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judges apperances, Court’s orders or orders directions and Registrar’s Orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------- S.V. Pitre for the Applicant. S.V. More, APP for the State. ...... ...... CORAM: D.B. BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B. BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B. BHOSALE, J. JUNE 29, 2006. JUNE 29, 2006. JUNE 29, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. The petitioner has impugned the order dated 25.4.2006 by which the learned Magistrate has rejected the application filed by the petitioner (Exhibit.67) under Section 91 of the Criminal Procedure Code. By that application the petitioner had prayed for calling the witness from Bank of Baroda for production of cheque bearing No. 616662 for clearing the ambiguity which was created due to admission :2: :2: :2: of the complainant in the cross-examination. The cross-examiantion of the complainant was completed on 6.1.2006 whereas this application seeking production of the cheque was filed at the stage when the matter was kept for judgment. While rejecting the application, the learned Judge has recorded the reasons in the order why on merits he was not in favour of allowing the application. I find no reason to interfere with that order at this stage, this being an inter-locutory order. . Writ petition is accordingly rejected. sd/- (D.B.BHOSALE,J)