IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 284 OF 2004 SHRI VITHAL KAMAT,BETIM,BARDEZ-GOA. ... Petitioner Versus SHRI GOVIND P.SINAI BHATKULI(SIN.DEC.)THROU'L.RS., ... Respondent Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. V. A. Lawande, Advocate for the Respondent no.1. Mr. F. E. Noronha, Advocate for the LRs of Respondent no.2. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 11th October, 2011 P.C. Heard Shri Rivonkar, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, Shri Lavande, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent no.1 and Shri F. E. Noronha, learned Counsel appearing for the legal representatives of the Respondent no.2. 2. After hearing the matter for sometime, Shri Rivonkar, the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner pointed out that considering that the impugned Order was passed on the basis that the application filed by the Petitioner under Section 103 of the Land Revenue Code was not maintainable, the Petitioner would avail of an alternate remedy by filing a Civil Suit for the purpose of getting their claim adjudicated in respect of the suit property. As such, Shri Rivonkar, learned Counsel, seeks leave to withdraw the above Writ Petition with liberty to file such Civil Suit. 3. Shri Noronha and Shri Lavande, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents, point out that all defences available to the Respondents in respect of such Civil Suit be left open. 4. In view of the above, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the Petitioner as prayed for. All contentions of the Respondents are left open. 5. Leave to amend forthwith. F. M. REIS, J. arp/*