HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR PETITIQNER RESPONDENT W. P. (0 No. 798/2010 M/s. Raipur Bus Servrice Through Managing Partner Gurmit Singh, S/o S.S. Sandhu, aged about 45 years, R/o Ganj Para, Durg, District Durg Vs. Regional Transport Authority, Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA Appearance: Mr. B.L. Dembra, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Shashank Thakur, counsel for the respondent. ORAL ORDER (25.02.2010) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J, Heard finally with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner M/s. Raipur Bus Service has filed this petition for issuance of necessary direction to the Regional Transport Authority, Raipur, to consider and decide its application for grant of the Regular Permit on the route Raipur to Takhatpur via Simga, Mungeli, Nandghat, Sambalpur and back one return trip daily in accordance with the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act. According to the petitioner, the said application has been filed on 28.07.2009 and no decision has been taken till date. Mr. Shashank Thakur, learned counsel for the respondent submits that if the said application has been filed by the petitioner and the same has not been disposed of till date, the Regional Transport Authority, Raipur, shall dispose of the same at the earliest in accordance with law. . W. P fC). N0. 798/2010 In view of the above submissions made by learned counsel for the respondent, this petition is disposed of with a direction that ifthe concerned Regional Transport Authority has not decided the application dated 28.07.2009 filed by the petitioner for grant of the Regular Permit for the above route till date, the same shall be disposed of in accordance with law, as early as possible preferably within a period of 10 weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order by the petitioner before the said authority. With the aforesaid direction/observation, this petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Rao