EiMt^^^KS'"^^ HIGH^QURTQFCHHATriSGARHATBILASPUR W. P. (S) No. 6902 of 2006 Pfctitioner Saheb Ram Patel, S/o Shri Bhagat Kam 1'atel, Agcd about 45 ycare, Uppcr DiyisiOQ Teacher, Govt. H^her Secondaiy Sch.ool, Tarkela, Block Ka^arh, Uistt. Ka^arh (C.U.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Ttirough: Secretaiy Departinent of Educatfon, ManttaJaya, D.K.S. Dhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officcr, Raigarh, Uistrict Kaigarh (U.U.) BIock Education Officer, BIock- RaigaA, District - Raigarh (C.G.) Principal, Govt Higher Secondary ScJiooJ, 'l'arkcla, Hlock Kaigarh, Uistfc Raigarh (C.G.) 2. 3. 4. Thakui- giagle Benclt: Hon'blc Mr. Justicc Satfeii K. Agaihotri. Shri Saajay Patel, Advocate for fhe Petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govfc Advocate for the State/respondents. O K PIS K ( Pasac-A on this 1 1dl<iay ofApri!, 2007) Leamed counsel appeariag for fhe petitioner as wdl as for the State/rcspondentsjointfy submit that the fact aad questtoa oflaw mvotved in the prescnt writ pctition are fhc samc to that of m Yashwaat Kumar Bhariuiw^j Vs. BSanicipal Corporation, Durg sad aaoth®{2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, whfch h^ bccn disposcd of vide order dated 3.4.2006. Leanaed coiiusel appearmg for the respondents does not contioveri; fhc said submission. Accorduigly, the writ petition is aflowal in terms of tiie order passcd ia tfac casc of Yashwaat Kamar Bharadwsd (supra), subject to verilication of the fact asto whefher the petitioncr has acquired B.Ed. Bxammation Certificate on his own expenses as per fhe circulars dated 24.12.1998 aad 1.3.1999 and further whcfher he has beea paid two advance increineiits or aot. No order as to costs. — SatishK.Agnihotri Judge