IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14479 of 2010 SARYUG MANDAL, Son of Tanik Lal Mandal @ Tanik Mandal, presently resident of Quarter No. 2014, Sector-9’ D’, P.S. Bokaro (Sector-9), District-Bokaro (Jharkhand).........................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 4. 05.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and the informant who vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 418, 406 and 504 of the I.P.C. It is alleged against the petitioner that it is the petitioner at whose instructions the marriage of the complainant’s daughter was fixed with Pradeep Kumar. It is alleged in the complaint that the payments have been made to the boy and the boy’s father and in paragraph no. 9 of the complaint it is mentioned that the demand for return of the money has been made to the boy and boy’s father. There is no allegation in the complaint that any money was paid to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the complainant 2 submits that the marriage was fixed on the instructions of the petitioner who wrongly instructed that the boy is a doctor as petitioner is related to boy side. Hence it is submitted that at least petitioner should make endeavour for return of informant’s money. In that view of the matter, let the petitioner, Saryug Mandal, be released on provisional anticipatory bail for six months on his surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 709C of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Munger, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is made clear that the petitioner will take all efforts that the money of the complainant so advanced to the boy’s side be returned within four months. If the matter is settled between the parties then the petitioner will be entitled to renew his prayer for anticipatory bail otherwise he 3 will surrender and will seek regular bail. With this observation this application is disposed of. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)