THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.27684 of 2005 Dated:05.01.2006 Between: Sri. Chinta Saraiah S/o Chinta Venkatiah Labour Contract, PSSS Ltd., R/o 25-11-118, Bapujinagar, Kazipet, Warangal District ..... PETITIONER AND The Commissioner, Warangal Municipal Corportion, S.V.N. Road Warangal, and others. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.27684 of 2005 ORDER: The petitioner is the President of Dalitha Sanitary & Civil Works Labour Contract Society, Bapujinagar, Kazipet, Warangal. The present writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 02.11.2005, for allotment of left over sanitation work. It is the case of the petitioner that pursuant to the notification, dated 18.07.2005, inviting tenders from eligible sanitary workers Societies for providing sanitation work in Warangal Corporation, he submitted a representation, but the same was not considered. It is also further case of the petitioner that some of the units were not allotted to other Societies, and therefore, the petitioner approached the first respondent on 02.11.2005 to allot balance of works to the petitioner, in vain. At the stage of admission itself, the first respondent has filed a counter affidavit as well as additional counter affidavit. It is stated that pursuant to the notification dated 18.07.2005, eight tenders were received. After conducting drawal of lots, the first respondent allotted the work to three DWACRA groups keeping in view the conditions of the notification. It is further stated that the tender notification was issued for allotting sanitation work up to 31.10.2005, and therefore, at this point of time, no grievance can be made out in non-consideration of the tender submitted by the petitioner, pursuant to the said notification. As the petitioner was not successful in the draw held by the respondents in the presence of all the applicants including the petitioner, the work was not allotted to him. The petitioner has not placed before this Court any guidelines, under which the first respondent is under obligation to allot balance of works to the petitioner. It appears that the tender notice itself was issued for allotting works in respect of seven units, which was earlier stayed by this Court. Therefore, no relief can be granted to the petitioner in this writ petition. However, as and when fresh tenders are invited, it shall be open to the petitioner to submit tender for allotment of works. The Writ Petition, with the above observations, is dismissed. No costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 05.01.2006 vs