IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 12643 of 2008 Between: K.Deepika D/o.K.Sudhakar Naidu Mionr Rep.by its father and natural guardian k.Sudhakar Naidu S/o.Sreenivasa Naidu(37) R/o.Kollupally(V) Gangavaram(M) Chittoor District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State of Andra Pradesh Rep.by its Secretary Department Of Higher Education A.P Secretariat Saifabad Hderabad 2 Rajeev Gandhi University Of Knoweledge Technologies IIIT Campus Gatchibowli Near Hitech City Hyderabad Rep.by its Vice Chancellor 3 The District Education Officer Government of A.P East Godavari District Kakinada 4 M.Sravani D/o.M.Subrahmanyam Reddy Minior Rep.by her Father and Natural Guardian M.Subrahmanyam Reddy R/o.Gandrajupalli(V)&(M) Chittoor District 5 Kancham Anitha D/o.K.Raja Reddy Minor Rep.by its Father and natural guardian K.Raja Reddy R/o.Gangavaram(V) &(M) Chittoor District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.1 to 3 in denying selection to the petitioner for admission into IIIT course for the year 2008-09 and instead of selecting the respondents No.4&5 as illegal arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the Rules and Regulations of the 2nd respondent's University and consequently direct the respondents 1to 3 to allot a seat to the petitioner for admission into IIIT Course for the year 2008-09 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.R.CHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 12643 OF 2008 ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Permission as sought for is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 27th August 2008. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 12643 OF 2008 27th August, 2008.