IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13007 of 2011 Dr.Kameshwar Singh son of late Sipahi Singh, Resident of Mohalla Jai Prakash Nagar (Near Hospital Chowk), Chapra, Pin – 841301. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Human Resource Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Vice Chancellor, J.P. University, Chapra. 3. The Registrar, J.P. University, Chapra. 4. The Vice Chancellor, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. 5. The Registrar, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 3. 16.8.2011. Heard Shri Shashi Shekhar Tiwary, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Mukund Mohan Jha, learned A.C. to G.P.18, who appears on behalf of respondent no.1/State, Shri Shivendra Kishore, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3/J.P. University and Shri Rajendra Kumar Giri, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.4 and 5/B.R.A. Bihar University. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 30.6.2008 as Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics from Jaglal Chaudhary College, Chapra under J.P. University, has prayed for directing the respondents to grant multiple relief. The petitioner has also prayed for a 2 direction for revision of his pension with effect from 1.1.2006 in terms of Government Resolution No.820 dated 23.9.2009 as well as for granting merger of 50% Dearness relief with effect from 1.1.2005. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be disposed of in respect of aforesaid two reliefs in terms of order dated 3.12.2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No.3616 of 2010 (Dr. Himanshu Bhushan Vrs. Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University and others) and other connected writ petitions, which has been reported in 2011(1) PLJR 900. The court is of the opinion that writ petition can be disposed of in the light of order passed in Dr. Himanshu Bhushan’s case (Supra), so far as revision of pension as well as merger of 50% Dearness relief are concerned. Accordingly, the writ petition stands allowed in terms of order passed in Dr. Himanshu Bhushan’s case (Supra).So far as other reliefs are concerned, petitioner is granted liberty to file representation 3 before respondent no.2/Vice Chancellor, J.P. University, Chapra as well as respondent no.4/Vice Chancellor, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, court expects that both the respondents will examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent nos.2 and 4 consider the claim of the petitioner as genuine, they are required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, aforesaid respondents are required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within three months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)