IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2614/2005 Gopal Singh S/o Shri Moti Singh Versus The State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order ::: 30.05.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Hem Singh Rathore, Advocate, for Ms. Gayatri Rathore, Counsel for petitioner Shri M.C. Gupta, Addl. Govt. Counsel and Shri S.L. Kumawat, Advocate, for Shri V.D. Gathala, Counsel for respondents #### By the Court:- The matter was listed in the court on 30.08.2007, 03.10.2007 and again on 16.11.2007, and, on all dates, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has died and prayed for time to move an application for substitution of legal representatives of deceased petitioner, on the record, but no steps have been taken so far in the matter in this regard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has already sent a message on the address of the petitioner but no one has come and contacted him, so the necessary application could not be filed. No steps have been taken in respect of substitution of legal representatives of the deceased petitioner, therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as abated. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman// IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Misc. Stay Application No.2339/2005 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2614/2005 Gopal Singh S/o Shri Moti Singh Versus The State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order ::: 30.05.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Hem Singh Rathore, Advocate, for Ms. Gayatri Rathore, Counsel for petitioner Shri M.C. Gupta, Addl. Govt. Counsel and Shri S.L. Kumawat, Advocate, for Shri V.D. Gathala, Counsel for respondents #### By the Court:- Consequent upon dismissal of the writ petition itself, the stay application, filed therewith, does not survive and the same is also dismissed. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//