IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22082 of 2009 IMTIAJ HAJAM, SON OF ALLAUDDIN HAJAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – BANDIPUR, P.S. RAMGARH, DISTT. KAIMUR AT BHABUA. ------PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 16/10/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Offence alleged against the petitioner is under Sections 366, 366A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the victim girl had gone along with the petitioner of her own accord and latter they married. It is further submitted that the age of the girl was assessed to be 17-19 years as per medical report and as such the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody since 4.4.2009 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that there is specific allegation against this petitioner of taking away the daughter of the informant. Later on the girl gave her statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C. in which she has alleged against the petitioner of taking her away. Counsel for the State also submits that the girl is also stated that she had taken away to Sikandarabad and thereafter went to another place and left at the Mohania Railway Station and as such, the story of marrying the victim is absolutely incorrect and false. Considering the nature of the allegations and the 2 material placed and on perusal of the case diary, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, it is rejected. S. Ali (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)