HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAWI AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 4®48of 2005 Petitioner Resham Lal Pandey, S/o DashraUi Pandey, aged about 63 yeare, R/o village and Post Garhphooljhar, Tahsil Basna, Dishfet Mahasamund Versus Respondents 1. Slale (rf ChhatUsgarh, Through - Secretary, Co-operative Dqartmait, Raipur (C.G.). 2. State of Madhya Pradesh, Through Secr^ary, C<xperafive D^aartment, Bhopat (M.P.) 3. Registrar, Co-operative Society ChhatUsgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Joint R^iistrar, Co-operaUve Society, Raipur (C.G.) WRff PETrriON UNDER ARTICLE 226/K7 OF TOE CONSTmjTIONOF INDIA (SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satiah K. Agnihotri, J.) Smt. Meena Shasfri, Advocate wfth Ms Mani Venna, Advocate for the petitfoner. Ms Sunita Jain, Panel lawyer forthe raspondents. ORDER (Passed on this 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the pefitioner, on instrucBons, submils that ttte petitioner does nc* want to corte^ this matter, at this state, on merits. However, ft fe prayed that the repTreentatfon dated 2.8.2005 (Annexure FW), pending before the Principal Secrrtaiy. Govt. of Chhatfegarti, may be consktered in accordancev h taw, on fls own merits. 2. Leamed counsel appeartng for the respondenls/State has no objecUon to the above submission made by leamed counsel appearing for the peUUoner. 3. Accordingly, the respondent No.1 nay consider and deckte ttie represertatton dated 2.8.2005, in accordance wBh law, on 'rts own mertts, as expedMously as possiMe, preferabfy wlhm a ^ period of four montts from the date <rf recefpt <rf a copy of ttiis \ order. \ 4. In view ofthe above, the petiSon stands (Bsposed of____—— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri /ilwtair Judge