IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45275 of 2009 1. DOMAN PASWAN, SON OF LATE NANHAK PASWAN. 2. SANJIT PASWAN, SON OF SHRI DOMAN PASWAN. BOTH RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE-RAJAPAKAR, P.S.-RAJAPAKAR, DISTRICT-VAISHALI. ………Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ………..Opp. Party. ----------- 2/ 08.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are accused of a case under Sections 363, 365 & 370 of the IPC. The petitioners and others were asked as to whether the informant should send her son outside the State for job or not. They replied in positive and thereafter, the informant sends her son, aged about 20 years to Punjab in the year 2004 but her son did not return. So, suspicion has been raised that the petitioners might have made the informant’s son to disappear. Submission is that the petitioners at best had advised the informant to send her son. No direct role has been assigned by them. Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Rajapakar P.S. Case No. 36 of 2009. Sanjeet/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)