-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2121 OF 2008 Maharashtra Surksha Rakshak Aghadi : Petitioner V/s. Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane District & Ors. : Respondents ... Ms R.J.Todankar for the petitioner. Ms Pallavi Divekar for respondent no.1. ... CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J.& S.A. BOBDE, J. DATE : OCTOBER 22, 2008. P.C. We have heard the counsel appearing for the parties. The counsel appearing for the respondent no.1 does not dispute the proposition that the controversy in the present case is squarely covered by the decision in Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Agadhi v. Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay, reported in 2007 (5) Bom.C.R. 405. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the facts in the present petition are different. Be that as it may, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgement of this Court in -: 2 :- Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Agadhi’s case (supra). The period mentioned in the said judgement shall commence from today. No order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE, J.