BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Sixth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.11697 of 2011 1 CHELLAKANNU 2 SENKUTTUVAN 3 ANAND 4 MARUTHAVANAN 5 PRADEEP 6 KANAGARAJU 7 MANIMARAN 8 THAMARAI SELVAN 9 ALBERT 10 SENTHIL 11 RAVI 12 VICTOR 13 SIVASURESH 14 GUNASEKARAN 15 GUNA 16 PALANI 17 MURUGESAN 18 SURESH 19 RAJESH KANNA 20 DHANABAL ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 to 20 Vs. STATE REP.BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PUDALUR POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. CRIME NO.180/2008 ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.K.KUMARAVEL Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 294(b) I.P.C and Section 3 of Tamil Nadu Public Property (Damages and Loss) Act, in Crime No.180 of 2008 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail 2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that a false case has been foisted against the petitioners for the offence under Section 294(b) I.P.C and Section 3 of Tamil Nadu Public Property (Damages and Loss) Act. He would further submit that the occurrence has been taken place on 29.10.2008 and the investigation is considerably over and because of the political motive now the petitioners apprehend for arrest and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.Refuting the same the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) would submit that the petitioners caused damage to the de-facto complainant's car glass worth about Rs.60,000/- and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 29.10.2008 and a case has been registered against them for the offence under Section 294(b) I.P.C and Section 3 of Tamil Nadu Public Property (Damages and Loss) Act and admittedly, the petitioners caused damage to the de-facto complainant's car glass worth about Rs.60,000/- in such circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners on condition that each petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.3,000 (Rupees Three Thousand only) to the credit of Crime No.180 of 2008 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvaiyaru and on receipt of the same the petitioners are entitled to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvaiyaru and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 06/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVAIYARU. 2 -Do-Thro' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THANJAVUR AT KUMBAKONAM. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PUDALUR POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S. K.KUMARAVEL Advocate SR.No.30154 akm/08.09.11 /2p-6c/ ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11697 of 2011 Date :06/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/