IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 20TH JUNE 2008 / 30TH JYAISHTA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2023 of 2008() ------------------------------ CRA.736/2005 of VI ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM CC.415/2003 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, KOCHI .................... REVISION PETITIONERS:APPELLANTS:ACCUSED 1 & 2: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. P.K.ROCKY MEMORIAL TRUST OWING THE MUTUAL AID BANKERS, PULLEPADY, CHITTOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM REPRESENTED BY P.L.NAVIS, AGED 69 YERS. 2. P.L.NAVIS, FOREMAN, MUTUAL AID BANKERS, AGED 69 YERS, PULLEPADY, CHITTOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.BABU CHERUKARA RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS:COMPLAINANT: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. P.RAMDAS, LATHA NIVAS, PADIVATTOM, EDAPPALLY. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.MOHANAN - R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. P.RAVINDRA BABU - R2 THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. ===================== Crl.R.P. No.2023 of 2008 ===================== Dated this the 20th day of June, 2008 ORDER Accused Nos.1 and 2 in C.C. No.415/2003 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate I, Kochi for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenge the conviction entered and the sentence passed against them concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A.No.6079 of 2008 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioners and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioners as well as the complainant and their respective counsels. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioners within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. The amount, if any, deposited before the trial court shall be refunded to the revision petitioners. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. Dated this the 20th day of June 2008 V. RAMKUMAR,JUDGE. css/