IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 26 of 2009 (S/S) Hari Singh ….…… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ………. Respondents With Writ Petition No. 51 of 2009 (S/S) Naresh Pal Singh ….…… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ………. Respondents With Writ Petition No. 52 of 2009 (S/S) Chandra Shekhar Gunwat ….…… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ………. Respondents With Writ Petition No. 53 of 2009 (S/S) Shravan Kumar ….…… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ………. Respondents With Writ Petition No. 243 of 2009 (S/S) Sidhartha Singh & another ….…… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ………. Respondents With Writ Petition No. 245 of 2009 (S/S) Yang Bahadur ….…… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ………. Respondents Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Vinaay Kumar, Standing Counsel for the State/respondents. Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. 2 BARIN GHOSH, C.J. (ORAL) Mr. M.C. Pant, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that these writ petitions have now become infructuous. 2. The writ petitions are, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. (Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 14.06.2011 14.06.2011 Aswal