IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2009 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(Crl.).No. 18 of 2009(S) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- SAYUJYA RANI, W/O.ANZARI, AGED 28 YEARS, MUSSALIAR MANZIL, MUNDAKKAL WEST, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.SATISH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. THE S.I. OF POLICE, KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION, KOLLAM. 3. ANSARI, S/O.M.ABDUL SALAM RAWTHER, AGED 36 YEARS, NIZAM BUILDING, THOTTUMUKKU, VITHURA P.O., TRIVANDRUM. NOW AT PROMECH TECHNICAL SERVICES, P.O.BOX NO.93493, DUBAI, UAE. 4. M.ABDUL SALAM, NIZAM BUILDING, THOTTUMUKKU, VITHURA P.O., TRIVANDRUM. 5. S.RUKIYA SALAM, W/O.ABDUL SALAM, NIZAM BUILDING, THOTTUMUKKU, VITHURA P.O., TRIVANDRUM. 6. NIZAM, S/O.ABDUL SALAM, NIZAM BUILDING, THOTTUMUKKU, VITHURA P.O., TRIVANDRUM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. JAI GEORGE. BY ADV. SRI.RAM MOHAN.G. FOR R4-6 SRI.G.P.SHINOD FOR R4-6 SRI.MANU V. FOR R4-6 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(Crl.) 18/2009. APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT. P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER. EXT. P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT IN CMP NO..118/2009 FILED BY THE PETIONER BEFORE THE CJM COURT, KOLLAM. A.K. BASHEER, & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P. (Crl.) No. 18 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of March, 2009. JUDGMENT BASHEER, J, Petitioner is the wife of respondent No.3. The one year old child born in the said wedlock is in the centre of controversy in this writ petition, filed by the petitioner alleging that the child was forcibly removed from her custody by respondent No.3 and his relatives. Anyhow, we do not propose to deal with the various allegations and counter allegations made by the parties against each other. 2. When this matter came up for consideration on February 6, 2009 respondent No.3 had produced the child before the court. After our interaction with the parties, we had directed that the child shall remain in the custody of the petitioner. Thereafter, the matter was referred to the Mediation Centre attached to this court. 3. The Mediator has filed his interim report. From our interaction as well as from the interim report, we are able to gather that there is no serious dispute between the parties. The discord, in our view, stems from some minor ego problem, which, we are sure, can be sorted out by the parties themselves. It will be open to the parties to go WP(Crl.). 18/2009. 2 before the same Mediator, who had adjourned the case for further mediation. The child shall remain in the custody of the petitioner. Petitioner shall however allow respondent No.3 to meet the child as and when he desires. Writ Petition is closed in the above terms. A.K. BASHEER, JUDGE P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sb.