BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Sixth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.PALANIVELU CRL OP(MD) No.12843 of 2011 1 V.RAVI 2 S.TAMIL SELVAN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE COMMERCIAL CRIME INVESTIGATION WING, TIRUCHIRAPALLI IN CR.NO. 4/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. D.SHANMUGARAJA SETHUPATHI Advocate For Respondent : M/S. A.RAMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 408 and 477 (A) of I.P.C., in Crime No.4 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners were charged under Sections 408 and 477(A) of I.P.C. He further submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that this petitioners are arrayed as A1 & A2 and they are salesmen of the fair price shop and they have taken articles like PDS rice kerosene and sold them to the open shop to the tune of Rs.3,88,984/- and the investigation is considerably over and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that these petitioners are salesmen and the investigation is considerably over and even though the petitioners were not arrested, neither they interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Musiri and on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 26/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MUSIRI 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TRICHY 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE COMMERCIAL CRIME INVESTIGATION WING, TIRUCHIRAPALLI +1. CC to M/S. D.SHANMUGARAJA SETHUPATHI Advocate SR.No.33195 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12843 of 2011 Date :26/09/2011 SMA/29.9.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/