IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WPSS No. 931 of 2008 Kamal Singh ..........Petitioner. Versus State & Ors. ....Respondents. Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the State / respondents. 19th September, 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Both the parties have consented for deciding the case finally today. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred the judgment of Division Bench of this Court vide judgment and order dated 4.3.2006 passed in Special Appeal No. 66 of 2005 State of Uttaranchal & Ors. Vs. Pushkar Bhatt and others contained in Annexure No. 6 reported in 2006 (1) U.D. Page 587, wherein the similar controversy was decided. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred the order dated 31.12.2007 passed in Writ Petition No. 1851 of 2007 (SS), where after relying upon the aforesaid judgment the matter has been decided as there also similar controversy was involved. 4. In view of the aforesaid, present writ petition is disposed of at admission stage in terms and observations made by the Division Bench of this Court vide judgment and order dated 4.3.2006 in Special Appeal No. 66 of 2005 State of Uttaranchal and others Vs. Pushkar Bhatt and others. All the pending application(s) are /is disposed of. (P.C. Verma, J.) 19.9.2008 Rathour