IN THE HIGH COURTOF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH. C.R.No.5605 of 2010 Date of decision:20.9.2010 Shobha Rani ...Petitioner vs. Haryana Wakf Board ...Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG. Present: None for the parties. Rakesh Kumar Garg,J.(Oral) The petitioner against whom a decree dated 14.5.2008 was passed by the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) Yamunanagar, has filed the present revision petition challenging the impugned order dated 10.8.2010 whereby her objectiond to the execution of the aforesaid decree have been rejected. The only objection raised by the petitioner before the Executing Court was regarding the jurisdiction of the Civil Court. According to the objections filed by the petitioner the civil Court had no jurisdiction to pass the order dated 14.5.2008 in favour of the respondent Board as under the provisions of the Wakf Act, 1995 the jurisdiction lies only with the Wakf Tribunal. Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Gobindram (dead) through Lrs v. Sugra Humanyu Mirza Wakf, Civil Appeal No.1182 of 2006, authoritatively laid down that the right, title or interest of a non Muslim in a wakf property cannot be decided by the Wakf Tribunal and in such cases only the civil Court has the jurisdiction. In view of the aforesaid judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme, I find no merit in this revision petition and the same is dismissed. ( Rakesh Kumar Garg) Judge September 20, 2010 rk