IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR Marko- m} 201w. : Flrm Karm Clnema Balco Townshlp, Balco Nagar Tahs11 and Dlstrlct Korba Through partner Shri Ashok\Kumar Agarwal S/o Fatechand Agrawal aged 42 years A§pellant/Objector J.Dr. Respondent Decreelholder objector SupuEdar Facts of the R/o Rlng Road Balco (Korba) ) VERSUS : 0/ l. Madhya Pradesh Film Vikas Nigam, Sanskrit Bhavan,l Ban Ganga Bhopal (M.P.)‘ : $ 2. Bharat Alumlnlum Co. Ltd through General Manager, Balco (Korba) g 3. Baljnath Sharma, R/o Balco Nagar S/o +10% kmrwh $§brba. Miscleneous appeal u/021 Rule 58%4) against the order (passed lin applications and objectiohs 24.9.2001 dt. 1.10 2001 and dt s 10 2001) passed on 25 1 2002] Upper District Judge Korba (C.(G,./): rejecting the objections .of the: appellant on objections u/02l R58 CPC read With ob ection u/s <47 CPC 1908 an éxewk‘a‘n CTWWW Mp i197 qz ‘ l Misc. appeal valued at $5 . 13,98,435 paise 41 with interest I and costsl ’ Court fee paid in appeal -— i Case :— Xl-HC-7 méémmW aim anéemm’as Pandey, Counsel for rcspond Nous for respondents CounSel for The appel tlzus appeal mth hberty to tak appropnate remedy under the law 1ts No 2 has no obJectlon 04/ 07/2005 ‘ Shri RaviSh Verma, Cou nsel'for the appellant. Shri Prashant Jayaswal, Sr. Advocate with Shri Viney No.2. 1 and 3. subm1ts that he Wants to w1thdraw V ‘ to Whlch counsel for responde Con31dered Allowed Appeal is dismissed as w In the light of the a1 1477/2002, r I.A.Nos.6809/ 201 of. x ithdrawn with aforesaid liberty. )ove order,’ M.C.P.Nos.1476/2002‘, )2 and 1361/ 2005 stand dis osed ‘ ' Sd/- ' VK Shnvastava Judge 8 - e N l . t