In the Punjab and Haryana High Court, at Chandigarh. CRM-M- 18062 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on July 27,2011 Jaimal Singh --Petitioner vs. State of Haryana --Respondent CRM-M- 19576 of 2011 Decided on July 27,2011 Mata Ram --Petitioner vs. State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Pankaj Nanhera & Mr.B.S.Jaswal,Advocates for the petitioners. Mr.Sagar Deswal,AAG,Haryana. Rakesh Kumar Jain,J:(Oral) This order shall dispose of two petitions bearing CRM-M- 18062 of 2011 (O&M) titled as Jaimal Singh Vs. State of Haryana and CRM-M-19576 of 2011 (O&M) titled as Mata Ram Vs. State of Haryana, as both of them have arisen out of FIR No. 30 dated 15.05.2011 registered under Sections 457,381,420,120-B IPC, at Police Station Sector 20, Panchkula, in which they have prayed for regular bail pending trial. Allegations contained in the FIR are that four answersheets bearing Roll Nos. 070311440009, 07031140020, 07031140030 and 07031140031 were found missing from the almirah where the same were placed by the complainant after the exams were over. Mata Ram (petitioner CRM-M- 18062 of 2011 (O&M) -2- in CRM-M-19576 of 2011) was Chowkidar and Jaimal Singh (petitioner in CRM-M-18062 of 2011), who is though named in the FIR is an employee in the Department of Irrigation against whom the allegation is that they have committed the offence for money which has been shared by both of them. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit the four persons, namely Sandeep Kumar son of Kashmiri, Surender Kumar, Sandeep Kumar son of Satbir Singh and Anoop Kamboj from whom the answersheets were recovered, have already been released on bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panchkula, vide his order dated 01.6.2011. He further submits that nothing is to be recovered from the petitioners who are in custody since 15.5.2011. Without observing anything on the merits and also keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the cases, both the petitions are allowed and the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. July 27,2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge