IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.48975-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 9, 2006 Mrs.Basanti ...PETITIONER VERSUS State of Haryana ....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr.Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Partap Singh, Sr.DAG, Haryana. ... Petitioner Basanti apprehending her arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No.266 dated 17.7.2006 registered under Sections 306/34 IPC at Police Station Sector 7, Faridabad, has filed this petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail. I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR. This order be read in continuation of the earlier order dated August 29, 2006 passed by this Court. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner, who is mother-in-law of the deceased, has been living separately from her son. Counsel further contends that during the investigation, the petitioner was found to have been living separately at the time of the alleged occurrence. Counsel for the petitioner contends that in terms of the aforesaid interim order, the petitioner has joined the investigation. This fact has not been disputed by the State counsel and he further states that in this case challan has already been filed and the petitioner is no more required for further investigation. In view of the above and for the reasons stated in the interim Crl.Misc.No.48975-M of 2006 -2- order dated August 29, 2006, the same is made absolute on the same terms and conditions. Disposed of accordingly. October 9, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE