IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Appplication No. 2255 of 2008 In Criminal Appeal No. 303 of 2008 Mahindra & Mahindra v. Maroti -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr M.R. Johrapurkar, Adv for applicant Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 11th March 2010 Heard learned counsel for the applicant. It is stated that application for certified copy was made on 17.3.2008 and it was received on 16.4.2008. Officer of the applicant was required to obtain concurrence from the Corporate office at Mumbai and, therefore, delay has occurred. None appears for respondent, though served. For the reasons stated in the application, delay neither appears to be deliberate nor intentional. Hence, the same is condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs. 250/- to be paid to the High Court Legal Services, Sub-committee at Nagpur within two weeks. Application disposed of. Judge. Hsj