IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 23RD JANUARY 2007 / 3RD MAGHA 1928 WP(C).No. 34615 of 2006(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ MANAGER, S.I.U.P.SCHOOL, KALOOR, KOCHI-17. BY ADV. SMT.K.M.AMINABEEVI RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ERNAKULAM. 4. SMT.B.A.PATHUKUNJU, HEADMISTRESS, S.I.U.P.SCHOOL, KALOOR. 5. SRI.K.U.ABDUL KAREEM, ARABIC TEACHER, S.I.U.P.SCHOOL, KALOOR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No. 34615 OF 2006 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 23rd day of January, 2007 JUDGMENT Petitioner challenges Ext.P7 order. Apparently one of the contentions raised is based on lack of jurisdiction. Case is that AEO alone has jurisdiction and the DEO, who passed the order is without jurisdiction. I am of the view that the petitioner should be relegated to the pursuit of the remedy available under Rule 92. Having heard learned Government Pleader, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that if the petitioner prefers a revision under Rule 92 of Chapter XIVA KER before the Government within a period of three weeks from today, a decision will be taken on the same after hearing all the affected parties within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the revision. I am leaving open the contentions of the petitioner. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb K.M.JOSEPH, JJ. - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A. No. OF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JUDGMENT Dated this the day of February, 2006.