C482 913/2011 Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, for the State. Having heard learned Counsel for the applicant, it appears that a revision has been preferred by the respondent no. 2 before the Sessions Judge against the order of the cognizance passed by the Magistrate on the chargesheet submitted against Mohd. Kasif and four others, and the learned Sessions Judge has summoned the entire record of the case from the court below. As a result, proceedings have been stunt in the lower court. Learned Counsel for the applicant prayed that direction may be issued to decide the said revision at the earliest. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with the observation that learned Sessions Judge shall made all possible endeavor to decide the said revision on the date fixed i.e. on 14.10.2011. The applicant may assist the learned DGC on behalf of the State. (Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) 30.9.2011 Prabodh