IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2008 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 11732 of 2008(V) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN IA.311,312,409,410/08 IN OS.351/2007 of SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR PETITIONER: 1. BHASKARAN, AGED 54, S/O.RAMAN RESIDING AT KANJIRAVELIL HOUSE, PERINGALA PO PINARMUNDA, PIN-683 565, KUNNATHUNADU VILLAGE KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. BALAN, AGED 52, S/O.RAMAN RESIDING AT KANJIRAVELIL HOUSE, PERINGALA PO PINARMUNDA, PIN-683 565, KUNNATHUNADU VILLAGE KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. USHA, AGED 49, W/O.BHASKARAN RESIDING AT KANJIRAVELIL HOUSE, PERINGALA PO PINARMUNDA, PIN-683 565, KUNNATHUNADU VILLAGE KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.C.ELDHO SRI.JIJO THOMAS RESPONDENTS: 1. PERIYAR VALLEY IRRIGATION PROJECT (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS PVIP), OFFICE OF THE PVIP, SUB-DIVISION NO.II, PERUMBAVOOR ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PVIP, OFFICE OF THE PVIP, SUB-DIVISION NO.II PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. SRI.C.I.SULAIMAN, AGED 52 YEARS S/O.ISMAIL, CHELLIPADATH (PEEDIKAYIIL) HOUSE PINARMUNDA, PERINGALA PO, KUNNATHUNADU VILLAGE KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD, KOCHI-30. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No. 11732 OF 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 7th day of April, 2008. = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = J U D G M E N T This writ petition is preferred for a direction to the Sub court, Perumbavoor, to consider Exts.P12, P15 and P17 within a stipulated time. The main grievance is the violation of the injunction. In order to establish before the court that the order of injunction has been violated, the petitioner has moved Ext.P13 application for issuance of a commission. It is always desirable that evidence regarding the violation of injunction existing on the property is immediately collected so that they may be very helpful to the court in the ultimate decision of the matter. Therefore I direct the court below to consider at least Ext.P13 application and dispose of the petition which is one for issuance of a commission before the court closes for summer holidays and shall try to dispose Exts.P12, P15 and P17 within a period of two months after the court reopens after the summer recess. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE bkn/-