IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2041 OF 2004 Union of India..............Petitioners Vs. M/s.D.Gowadia & Co...........Respondents Mr. K.R. Mishra i/b. Mr. T.C. Kaushik, for petitioners Mr. H.E. Palwe, for respondents. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & F.I. REBELLO & F.I. REBELLO & MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE: 15TH JUNE,2006 P.C. . Respondents had approached this Court under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Designate of the Chief Justice was pleased to appoint an Arbitrator by order dated 24-6-2003. The petitioners are now aggrieved by the said order. This order was passed at the time when the judgment in Rani Construction was the law declared. The Apex Court has now held that against an order passed under Section 11 no Appeal will lie to this Court and the aggrieved party will have to approach the Apex Court. Considering that petition dismissed. Liberty to the parties to move the Apex Court, if so advised. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J). J). J).