IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2530 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2530 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2530 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL (L) NO. 569 OF 2006 APPEAL (L) NO. 569 OF 2006 APPEAL (L) NO. 569 OF 2006 IN IN IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1216 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1216 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1216 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUIT NO. 960 OF 2006 SUIT NO. 960 OF 2006 SUIT NO. 960 OF 2006 Dr.Shailaja Arvind Dabholkar & Anr. .. Appellants Vs. Bhagirathibai wd/o.Chandrashekhar .. Respondents Kale & Anrs. Ms.Breta D’Souza i/b. M.P.Vashi for the Appellants. Mr.Omprakash Pandey for the Respondents. ----- CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 11TH AUGUST, 2006. DATE : 11TH AUGUST, 2006. DATE : 11TH AUGUST, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellants. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Place the above Appeal on board for admission on 28th August, 2006. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)