IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5512 of 2009 Between: B. Maroni W/o. Late Kishan R/o. H.No. 3-88, Chintalagutta Temple, Bonal Village, Lingampet Mandal, Nizamabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State of A.P. Rep. by Director General of Police Having Office at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent of Police Nizamabad Dist. Having Office at S.P. Office Campus, Nizamabad. 3 The Sub Inspector of Police P.S. Lingampet Nizamabad Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MOHD.MOIN AHMED QUADRI Counsel for the Respondents:AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: The husband of the petitioner was killed on 03.03.2009. On the complaint received by the police, Crime No.27 of 2009 was registered for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. It is the case of the petitioner that though she mentioned the names of three persons, namely, Lal Singh, Ramesh and Vasanth Rao, to respondent No.3, he did not mention those names in the First Information Report. The petitioner’s apprehension is that respondent No.3 has been deliberately shielding the culprits and if he is allowed to continue with the investigation, justice will not be done to her. Though no counter-affidavit is filed by the respondents, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that respondent No.3 is not the investigating officer but the Inspector of Police, Yella Reddy is in-charge of investigation. She further submitted that one Vasanth Rao Banoth confessed to having killed the husband of the petitioner and, therefore, his name was arrayed as accused and he was arrested. In view of the above submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the relief claimed by the petitioner to transfer investigation from respondent No.3 has become infructuous. If the petitioner still has a grievance of not arraying the other two suspects as accused, she shall be free to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate with appropriate application in this regard. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.7206 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 24th JUNE, 2009. kvni