IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 14060 of 1993 Between: 1.T Appa Rao, aged about 5l years; 2.Ch.Jaya Ram, aged about 39 years S/o Narayana; 3.K V Ramana S/o Rangacharyulu, aged 31 years; 4.G Kanakaraju, aged about 48 years; 5.S Appanna S/o Narasimhulu, aged 54 years; 6.R Mallikharjunasarma S/o Hanumanthurao, aged 34 years; 7.P V Sitharamacharyulu, aged about 55 years; 8.K V N Sairam S/o Konappanacharyulu, aged 25 years; 9.K Ramakrishnamacharyulu, aged 36 years; 10.S Ramanarasimhacharyulu S/o Ramalakshmanacharyulu; 11.U Madhavacharyulu, aged 50 years; 12.P Apparao, aged about 28 years; 13.K Latchanna, aged about 63 years; 14.S T P A V Ramanujacharyulu, aged about 73 years; 15.T P Padmanabhacharyulu, aged 72 years; 16.T Narayana, aged about 50 years; 17.K Venkatarmudu, aged about 40 years; 18.K Ramu, aged about 28 years; 19.P Ramarao, aged about 45 years; 20.D Adilakashmi, aged about 35 years; 21.T Pentaiah, aged about 40 years; 22.K Rajarao, aged about 23 years; 23.T Srinivasarao, aged about 22 years; 24.P Ramarao, aged about 40 years; 25.M Prasadarao, aged about 25 years; 26.K Satyanarayana, aged about 35 years; 27.L Chinna, aged about 50 years; 28.U Suryanarayanacharyulu S/o Madhavacharyulu, aged 23 years; 29.P Guruvulu, aged about 45 years; 30.T Appamma W/o Pentaiah, aged 30 years; 31.V Paidiraju S/o Latchanna, aged about 26 years; 32.K K Kodandaramacharyulu S/o Sri Venkateswarlu, aged about 59 years; All are working in Sri Ramaswamyvari Temple, Ramathirdham, Nellimerla Mandal, Vizianagaram district. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1.Deputy Commissioner, Endowments, Department of Endowments; Kakinada, East Godavari district; 2..Executive Officer, Sri Ramaswamyvari Devasthanam, Ramathirdham; Nellimerla Mandal, Vizanagaram district; 3.Sri Jagan Mohan Rao, Senior Assistant, Sri Santhosimatha temple; Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam district. (Petition against R.2 & R.3 dismissed for default as per court order dated 22-6-1999) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ more in the nature of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring that the action of the 1st respondent in posting the 3rd respondent as Senior Assistant in Sri Ramaswamyvari Devasthanam, Ramathirdham, Nellimerla Mandal, Vizianagaram district as arbitrary and illegal and direct the respondents 1 and 2 not to post any additional employees to the said institution which involves additional financial liability of the establishment charges which exceeds 40% of the income of the institution and pass such other orders. For the Petitioners: MR.V.VENKATARAMANA,Advocate For the Respondent No.1: G.P. for Endowments. The Court Made the Following : W.P.No.14060 of 1993 ORDER: Having regard to the dismissal of the writ petition against the respondents 2 and 3 as per court order dated 22-6-1999, nothing survives nor any relief can be sought for in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. 24th JUNE, 2004 Bss/HSD Assistant REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Deputy Commissioner, Endowments, Department of Endowments, Kakinada; 2. 2CCs toG.P. for Endowments, High Court of AP., Hyderabad (OUT) 3 .2CD copies