( 1 ) wp1165.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1165 OF 2011 Omprakash s/o. Hanumantrao Devdware .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. R.D. Bhalerao, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.D. Godbharle, A.G.P. for the respondents. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & S.V. GANGAPURWALA,JJ. DATED : 17.02.2011 P.C. :- 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner claims to be successful bidder of auction of sand in the year 2008-2009. The petitioner's grievance is that the petitioner was not allowed to excavate the sand. Therefore, representations were made to the authority, which were not attended to. ( 2 ) wp1165.11 3. In the facts of the case, we are not inclined to exercise our extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction. The petitioner has approached this Court after 2-3 years of arising of the cause of action. The petitioner may resort to alternate appropriate remedy, as may be permissible. 4. The petition stands disposed of. [S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] snk/2011/FEB11/wp1165.11