:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2289 OF 2007 Ms. Daisy Damania ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr. R. Sathyanarayan for applicant. Ms. S.V. Gajare, APP for State. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. Date : July 18, 2007. Date : July 18, 2007. Date : July 18, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Sathyanarayan the learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. Gajare the learned APP for the State. 2. The grievance raised in this application is limited in as much as the fresh investigation order could not be continued unless the Criminal Revision Application No. 986 of 2005 which has been pending before the learned Additional Sessions Judge at Bombay is finally decided and more so when the stay granted in the said revision application has been continued :2: all along. 3. It is hereby directed that the Criminal Revision Application No. 986 of 2005 be heard and decided on its own merits as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months from the receipt of writ from this court. The fresh investigation directed shall stand stayed till the revision application is finally decided and the fresh investigation so directed shall be subject to the final order in the revision application. The proceedings in Criminal Case No. 489/PW/2007 pending on the file of the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate’s 19th Court, Esplanade, Mumbai shall stand stayed during the pendency of the revision application. 4. Petition is disposed off accordingly. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)