1 CP 356/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO.356 OF 2011 In WP/4406/2000 SUBHASH MADHAVRAO PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioner : Patil Prakashsing B. AGP for Respondents 1 to 3: Mr. VH Dighe Advocate for Respondents 4 & 5: Mr.SR Barlinge ***** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 5th DECEMBER,2011. PER COURT : 1) Heard. The petitioner feels that his pensionary benefits, in spite of directions to comply with the same within six months, are not complied either by the Management or by the State authorities. 2) Mr.Barlinge, on instructions, submits, indeed all the papers relating to pensionary benefit of the petitioner were forwarded to the Government on 27.10.2010. However, the affidavit in reply filed by learned AGP, informs that there are certain deficiencies in the details/particulars forwarded by the management. Mr.Barlinge, on instructions, informs, such deficiencies will be cured by the management in any case within fifteen days from today. 3) Considering the above situation, learned AGP 2 CP 356/2011 shall also ensure that the Government to release the pensionary benefits to the petitioner in the time bound schedule. For the present, Contempt petition disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/