IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.313 of 2007 LAXMI DEVI I Versus RAJ KUMAR SAH ----------- 2 19.8.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. The order passed by the Court below cannot be said to be vitiated on account of any jurisdictional error. The suit would still remain a suit for divorce even after allowing of the amendment by the Court below in the impugned order. At this stage, Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was waiting for the result of this civil revision application and had not filed the supplementary written statement as against the amendment allowed by the Court below. If that be so and if the petitioner is really interested in contesting the matter as also by filing her supplementary written statement, she must do so within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order failing which the Court below will proceed as if the petitioner would not intend to file any supplementary written statement. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this application is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)