HIGH COdRT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BIIA8PUR WRIT PETITSON No. 864 of2004 ^VU<-t PETITTONER RKSPONDENTS Kamal Ram Sinha S/o Shi'i Mukund Ram Sinfoa, aged about 32 years, Sarpaiwh, Gram Panchayat Laclikera, resident of Village Lachkera, Block Fingeshwar Tehsil Rfcyixil, Di^ict Raipur (CG). VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh through tfae Secretary Depamneiit of Paiicliayat, Maufralaya, DK Buildiiig, Raipm\ Tehsil and District Raipur (CG). 2. Tlie Chief Executive Officei', Jaiipad Paudiayat, Fingeshwar- District Raipur (CG). 3. The Upper Collector, Gariyabaiid, DIstrict Raipur (CG). 4. The Sub Divisional Officer/Prescribed Authority Gaiiyafoand, Diytrict Raipiir (CG). WgJT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB:BQn'bte SMSatistoK.AfismhQl^J, Presesit: Smt. Renu Kochar, Advocates for the petitioner. Sliri P.K. Bhaduri, Pasiel.Lawyer tbrthe State. ORALORDER (Passsd on 6m day ofFsbrjar>', 2009) With the coiisent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 1. Leamed counsel appearing fbr the petitioner submits that the order dated 18.11.2002 (Annexure P/7), passed by the Additional Commissioner, Raipur Division- has not been complicd with bythe concemed authorities. 2, Be that as it may, this is not an executing court. If the authority has not complied with the order passed by the Additional Commissioner, thepetitioner should approach the higher authorities to ensure compliance ofthe order. 'Fhe High Court is not an executing court for compliaiice ofthe order passed by the revenue authorities. 3. Accordmgly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order asto costs. 4. Conseauentlv. M(W)P No. 778/04- application for m'ant of interim relief, stands disposed of. S??hii Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge