^^e>" ^y" f ^-' ^> IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.^ W.P.fS) N0. ^^67- /2010 1. Pratap Pandey, S/o- Shri LateSuresh Chandra Pandey, Aged about 48 years, R/o-Ward-Bhrahmpara, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through-Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ^ 2. Director, Public Instructions, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ^ 3. Collector, Surguja, Distt. Surguja, C.G. ^4. District Education Officer, Ambikapur, Surguja, Distt. Surguja, Chhattisgarh. ^^»^^,, %^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDJA 3n^T'^Tf^fNF TT^TT ^TT^T sb^Jch f^ ^ Tumane *iWWl «l*11<ih T^ ^i^iKn^, ^ti1<r<^<o, f®i<ni^^< ^..:^.^.^MM....^200 ^TI^?T TT^R> (1?^^) ^'wi^R ^a 37T^?T SB : Hors'ble Shrj Manindra Mohan 3 23-OS-2010 Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, couns|et Smt, Smita Ghai, Panel Lawy^r copy. Heard. Submission of learned ooun^ petitioner had approached this Court ^ of 2009) wherein an order was pa^ petitioner to make representation be'j their decision on 'the representation passed by the M. P. State Administratij Jha vs. o^ afterthe order ofthis Hon'bie Court, t! and even though the Collector vide iti seleot list to the DiTector, til! date no de Taking into consideration the r Court, it would be appropriate to dlr decj'sion in the case of the petitioner, offour monthsfrom the date of receipt With the aforesaid direction, th€ <=r)i^I<n<fl<i 'RPR^ff ^f f^st <F3t^i< ^'3tRW3?|7^?T hrivastava,J« stforthepetitioner. ^r for the State/respondents on advance e! for the petitioner is that earlier the y fiiing a writ petition (i.e. W.P.(S)No.2559 sed on 15-05-2009 giving liberty to the bre the respondent State authorities for in the iight of order dated 16-02-1996 /e Tribunai, Jabaipurin the matter of.tem ers (O.A.No.15/1995). It is submitted that ie petitioner had preferred representation ; memo dated 21-01-2010 forvvarded the fcision has been taken in the matter. |ature ofgrievance, in the opinion ofthis ^ct respondent No.2 to .take appropriate h accordance wlth tavv, with an outer Simit ^facopyofthisorder petition jsfinallydisposedof. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge