Crl.M.No. M-8622/2010(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M.No. M-8622/2010(O&M) Date of decision: 17.8.2010. Tej Pal Rana ....................Petitioner v. The State of Haryana and others ...............Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present: Mr.Sandeep Jasuja,Advocate for the petitioner. Jaswant Singh.J. Prayer in the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.PC is for quashing the FIR No.130 dated 10.5.2009 under Sections 420/406/419 IPC, PS Palam Vihar, Gurgaon and all subsequent proceeding arising therefrom. The petitioner is a property dealer based at Gurgaon. It is alleged in the petition that earlier he was carrying on the business of property dealing with respondent no.4-his childhood friend, who in good faith had obtained signatures of petitioner on some blank papers/documents. It is further alleged that in the year 2008, petitioner and respondent no.4 parted ways and since then petitioner has been carrying on the business of property dealing independently, which offended respondent no.4 and his father namely Iswar Singh Jakhar. It is also alleged that respondent no.4 by fabricating the blank papers/documents, filed a complaint before respondent no.3-SHO PS Crl.M.No. M-8622/2010(O&M) 2 Palam Vihar,Gurgaon alleging therein petitioner had sold house no.R- 134, New Palam Vihar, Gurgaon measuring 276.5 square yards vide agreement dated 15.8.2008 against earnest money of Rs. Five lacs from respondent no.4, though the said property already stood sold on 23.10.2008 vide registered sale deed by GPA holders namely Bijender Rana and Virender Rana of Palam Vihar. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the property in question was purchased by none else than the sister-in-law (bhabi) of respondent no.4 vide registered sale deed dated 23.10.2008, to which the petitioner was a witness and petitioner, being a property dealer could not indulge in any such re-sale. It was, thus contended that the allegations in the FIR are false. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the record, I find no ground to interfere in the present petition under Section 482 Cr.PC. The allegations of fabrication of blank signed papers/documents by respondent no.4, can only be ascertained after recording of evidence and its appraisal during the trial. This court, in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.PC, is not equipped with any such mechanism to check the correctness of the allegations made by the petitioner in the present petition and hence no direction can be issued to quash the FIR in question. Accordingly the present petition is dismissed. 17.8.2010 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge