IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CMPMO No. 727 of 2008. Decided on: March 5, 2010 Madan Singh and others ….. Petitioners. Versus Sohan Singh and others …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice For the petitioners : Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. R.R. Rahi, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3. Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate for respondent No.4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Defendants No. 1 to 4 in Civil Suit No. 15/1 of 2004 on the file of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Theog are the petitioners herein. They are aggrieved since their application filed under Section 10 read with Section 151, C.P.C. for the stay of the suit was dismissed. According to them, unless and until a decision is rendered in Civil Suit No. 54 of 2007 pending before this Court, it may lead into conflicting decisions. There are other contentions as well. The Petition is vehemently opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. Having regard to the nature of the contentions and likelihood of conflicting decrees 2 particularly since the issue pertains to the title to the property which is the subject matter of both the suits, it is only appropriate and in the interest of justice and in the interest of the parties too that both the suits are tried before this Court. Therefore, Civil Suit No. 15/1 of 2004 pending before the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Theog, District Shimla is transferred to this Court to be tried alongwith Civil Suit No. 54 of 2007. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the trial may be expedited. The parties may move the learned Single Judge for expeditious trial of the suit. The Petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications. March 5, 2010 (Justice Kurian Joseph), (rks) Chief Justice