IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10461 of 2011 ASHISH RANJAN SON OF MAHESH PRASAD. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 21.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the informant. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ekangarsarai P.S. Case No. 56 of 2010 pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda registered under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The marriage was performed in the year 2007 when the death took place in the year 2009. There is accusation of demand of dowry. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner performed love marriage, hence, there was no question of demanding the dowry. Moreover, the petitioner got the victim admitted in Vinayaka Mission University, Salem under Directorate of Distance Education for Technical Education. The petitioner took the victim to Appolo 2 Hospital and victim was only taking the name of her father. Considering the fact that the death has taken place after seven years of the marriage and the accusation was of demand of dowry, this Court is not inclined to interfere. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail of the petitioner keeping in view the aforesaid contention of the petitioner. With the above observation, this application is, accordingly, disposed off. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)