IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE FRIDAY, THE 14TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 23RD BHADRA 1929 WP(C).No. 27363 of 2007(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ BABU,S/O. VELAYUDHAN PILLAI @ VELUPILLAI PLAVILA MELETHIL VEEDU, VETTILATHAZHATHU CHERI, THRIKKOVILVATTOM VILLAGE,KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY LOCAL BODIES ADMINISTRATION SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATHS,KOLLAM. 3. THE SECRETARY, THRIKKOVILVATTOM GRAMA PANCHAYATH KOLLAM. 4. CHANDRAN PILLAI,S/O,.CHELLAPPAN PILLAI, PLAVILATHATHETHIL VEEDU,THATHATHUCHERI, THRIKKOVILVATTOM VILLAGE,KOLLAM. R1-R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.K.J.MOHAMMED ANZAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.27363 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 14th September, 2007 JUDGMENT Heard Mr.C.Rajendran, counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader who has taken notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 4th respondent is being allowed by the third respondent-Panchayat to construct the building in gross violation of K.M.B.R.1999 which has been extended to the Panchayat as per the Government notification dated 6.6.2007 with immediate effect. I do not propose to examine the correctness of the above grievance. Ext.P2 complaint appears to be pending before the third respondent. The third respondent-Panchayat will take up Ext.P2 immediately, issue notice to the 4th respondent, hear the petitioner and the 4th respondent and take a decision on Ext.P2. If necessary the Panchayat will conduct necessary local inspections with notice to the petitioner and the 4th respondent before decision is taken. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE