IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1855 of 2010 VIJAY KUMAR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. . ----------- 5/ 22/06/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and for the opposite parties. The Writ Court had restrained appointments in 2009-2010 from a panel prepared on 7.11.2008. It was observed that if there were vacancies, they could be the subject of fresh advertisement and consideration only. The show cause on behalf of Opposite Party No.2 states that no appointment shall be made from the panel of 7.11.2008 and that it would be made only in accordance with the directions of the Court, which naturally means a fresh advertisement and selection. If the Government proposes to make such appointments, naturally it is expected to act expeditiously and not await the institution of a fresh writ application to do so. The contempt proceedings stand disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)