4 ^'. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. R S. NOACX.?& /2006 SINOLE 8EN^I PETITIONER ^^·f^ ^MK^ >^ 1fr!i";>to,.-"' ^M^r .•••"' d.<?> •V ^y>" ^'^~ '<^-- ^ISPONDENT ^ r~. ov^-"' ^ G.R.Prajapatiaged about 57 years. S/o Shri Shyamram Prajapati --' Designation-Fild officerVetenari Treatment Village- Belargaon, Post-Belarbazar, Tahsil & Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS ^ 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Agriculture and Animal Husbondry Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur. ^ 2. Director Services Treatment ofAnimal Husbondry, Raipur C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA a XI-HC-78 *11*1MIShNlch 7=T '^ll^ld'4, eiTn*f'i6, Rfciiuy nTO.^:«to>..^-'^^200^ 3ll^l Maih (<i?t^<s<^<T) a:n^T?irR-fi't] (TOT 3n^5T shHlqi f\ ^ iarve ??HTW ;Hficr sn^r 8.8.2006:- Shri Somkant Verma, couns^ Shri Satish Gupta, Depi|rty respondents, on advance copy. Heard both the counsel. By this petition, the petitic^ 5-7-2006, whereby the petitioner Nari, District Dhamtari. It is settled law thatthe tran^fer is made on the ground of malafki^ petition, no such violation has beerl same is liable to be dismissed and i( Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.p stand disposed of. ^ner has questtoned the order dated Uias been transferred from Dhamtari to can be questioned only if the same or against any stetutory rules. Inthis raised. The petition is devoid of merrt, (is hereby dismissed. .^094^006 and I.A. No.7490/2008 also •t>l'llf<-f''fl-f HI*iMTiffe^<Rl'WK ^3Tf^IT3IT^T for the petitioner. Govt. /^fvocate for the State/ Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.