IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26458 of 2009 RANJU MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 19.08.2009 Heard both sides. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of bail. It appears that earlier, he had approached this court in Cr. Misc. No. 39084 of 2008 which was heard and disposed of under order dated 23.12.2008. Prayer for bail was refused observing as under: “However, if the trial of this case is not taken up within seven months from the date of receipt of this order in the court below, the petitioner is granted liberty to renew his prayer for bail.” Learned counsel, by filing supplementary affidavit, states that on 11.5.2009, charges have been framed whereafter 16.6.2009 was the date fixed when no witness on behalf of the prosecution was produced and thus examined. In the facts and circumstances of this case, this court, while declining the prayer for bail, disposes of the present application in the following manner: Let the trial court make endeavour and examine all the prosecution witnesses on or before 27th December, 2009 failing which the trial court shall release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to its satisfaction in connection with Sessions Trial No. 298/08/166/08 (giving rise to Govindpur P.S. case no. case no. 16 of 2008) subject to the following 2 conditions: (i) One of the bailers will be own/close family member of the petitioner. (ii) The petitioner shall appear in person on each and every date fixed in the Court below. In case of default on two consecutive occasions without any cogent/satisfactory reason, the bail bond of the petitioner shall be cancelled and thereafter the Trial Court will be at liberty to secure his arrest in accordance with law. .The application is, accordingly, disposed of. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )