:8tuRI F Rf&**i- ||tlJ<LI. !L»S-**-<*' S •\(30 Page No. (1. IN THE HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. ['i-'2-^ /2006 PETITIONER ./ ^ \'^-'',A ^•^^s^ '*' ^Aipt >/^v^- ^-^\fy »<8-* Om Prakash Shrivastava, ,ot ..•••^'C\ff^".^ s/°Late shri Awadh Bihari Lal <?•• ..-• Shrivastava, aged about 63 years, Voluntarily Retired Lecturer, Government Higher Secondary _^< ^<^^'^'// ^ School, Keshkal, District - Bastar, ^!^S^^' (C-G-)- ^' ^y ~ . o^^ N.0 RESPONDENTS . At present Resident of Village - Harrapadao, P.0. - Keshkal, District - Bastar, (C.G.) VERSUS ^1- State of Chhattistarh, Through : The Secretary, Tribal Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.). 2. The Commissioner, Schedule Tribe andSchedule Caste Development, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, (C.G.). 3. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Jagdalpur, District - Bastar, (C.G.) 4. The Principal, Boys Higher Secondary School, Keshkal, . - - --.District- Bastar, (C.G.) 5. TheAccountant General, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, (C.G.). 6. The Senior Account Officer, Office of Accountant General, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Details of the petition 1. Particulars of the petitioner : As stated above in cause title. Particulars of the respondents : As stated above in cause title. Particulars of the order against which the petition is niade : The petitioner most respectfully submits that this writ petition has not been filed against any particular order ofthe respondents. The petitioner is voluntarily retired Governraent Servant from the post of Lecturer. The petitioner was retired on dtd. 31.10.2003 by the order of respondent No. 3. The copy of retirement order has been also send to respondent No. 4. After retirement, the retrial due except G.P.F. amount has been paid to the petitioner by the State Government through the respondent No. 1 to 4. But G.P.F. amount Rs.2,89,494 /- and interest on it which was due to the office of respondent No. 5 and 6 has not been paid to the petitioner only Rs. 18,583 /- has been paid. When the petitioner demanded to pay the balance G.P.F. amount to respondent no. 5 8s 6 through the respondent No. "=F G—78 3iI^I ^BI lc(-|J4i ^t^ -3TT^?T Sh+1 wtnr^i*iiq» 'T=T ^iqid^ ytTl'H'Ko, fs|<"1l'My.< rf^,..l"^... .;..lz2:.^ 3ii^?['<pra' ('^3^1) WTOTC ^iftg 3ii^r couhse Shri Subhash Yadav, Shri Sumesh Baiaj, Govt. Shri S.K Beriwal, counse! Counse) for the petstione been paid to the petitioner; withdrawthe present petition. Permissicin aranted. Accordinalv- the petition i; il for the petltioner. P.dvocate for the State. 1 |for respondents No. 5 and 6. it submits that entire amount has tHerefore he seeks oermission to t dismissed as Vi/ithdrav/n. <»ll«itci«ll'lIIHfff 'if fet^ <pj|<^|( ^sffiroan^i Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge