IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH JULY 2011 / 5TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 40533 of 2003(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. SUMILA.P.C., JUNIOR CLERK, KARAMUCK SERVICE CO. OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.16, KANDASANKADAVU P.O., TRICHUR DISTRICT. 2. USHA C.D., JUNIOR CLERK, KARAMUCK SERVICE CO. OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.16, KANDASANKADAVU P.O., TRICHUR DISTRICT. 3. V.V.SAJEENDRAN, PEON KARAMUCK SERVICE CO. OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.16, KANDASANKADAVU P..O, TRICHUR DISTRICT. 4. P.K.SAJEEVAN, PEON, KARAMUCK SERVICE CO. OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.16, KANDASANKADAVU P..O, TRICHUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.S.RAMANANDA PAI RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, CO.OPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO. OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), THRISSUR. 3. THE KARAMUCK SERVICE CO. OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.16, KANDASANKADAVU P..O, TRICHUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 4. P.B.JOHY, POTTEKKATTU HOUSE, PALAZHI, MANALOOR P.O., THRISSUR. R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 40533 of 2003(A) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX --------------- PETITINER'S EXHIBITS ---------------------------------- EXT.P1. COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO.OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), TRICHUR DT. 20.2.2001. EXT.P2. COPY F THE GOVERNMENT ORDER G.O. (RT) NO.617/2003/CO.OP. DT.22.10.2003. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL ------------------------------------ / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE VK P.N. RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.40533 of 2003 ------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T None appears for the petitioners. There was also no representation when the case was called on for hearing today. When the writ petition came up for consideration on 30.6.2011, this Court directed the petitioners to take fresh steps within one week to serve notice on the fourth respondent in the correct address. The Registry has reported that the petitioners have not so far taken steps in that regard. The writ petition is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution. P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. nj.