IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.11813 of 2010 Ranbir Singh Phogat Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial Govt. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-1, Chandigarh & others Present: Mr.Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The main ground of attack in regard to the award passed by the Labour Court is that the court failed to consider that there was no parity of punishment maintained by the Disciplinary Authority. The counsel has made reference to the impugned award to urge that one Yadav was awarded different or lesser punishment than what was imposed on the petitioner. There is no concept of law which talks of maintaining parity of punishment. The punishment always would depend upon the role/responsibility of an individual. Nothing is pointed out to show that there is need to maintain parity of punishment by the punishing authority either by way of statute or by way of any judgment. No case for interference, thus, is made out. Dismissed. August 03, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE