IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39067 of 2009 BIKRAMADITYA SINGH, SON OF RAJ KUMAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF CHECHARDIH, P.S. BIDUPUR, DISTRICT VAISHALI. ---- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. POONAM DEVI, WIFE OF SRI BIKRAMADITYA SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHECHARDIH, P.S. BIDUPUR, DISTRICT VAISHALI, AT PRESENT RESIDING WITH FATHER PARMANAND SINGH AT VILLAGE KHAJURAR, P.S. BHADAUR, DISTRICT PATNA. ---- OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 2 9.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only on the basis of S.A. the cognizance has been taken. Besides which it is also submitted that the complainant had filed an application before the Bihar Mahila Ayog, Patna. The Mahila Ayog directed that the parties should live together and fixed a date for them to meet and start their life. The petitioner alleges that the complainant did not turn up on the date fixed by the Mahila Ayog rather filed a complaint in the Court at Barh. There is no bar the petitioner persuading his wife and resolving the matter through mediation on the intervention of friends or any other responsible person in the society. As far as the order taking cognizance is concerned, I find no illegality in the order. This application is dismissed. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)