IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 14TH JULY 2008 / 23RD ASHADHA 1930 W.P(C).No. 21120 of 2008(L) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LIMITED, 4TH FLOOR, THADIKKARAN CENTRE, PALARIVATTOM, COCHIN-25. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER/ AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SAJEEV JOSEPH. BY ADV. SRI.SOORAJ T.ELENJICKAL RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, ERNAKULAM. 2. C.K.DAS, CHANJAVETTICKAL HOUSE, MANIPPARA P.O., KARIMPAN, IDUKKI. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SMT. K.R. DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 21120 OF 2008 (L) = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 14th day of July 2008 J U D G M E N T Ext. P6 order passed by the 1st respondent is under challenge. The petitioner is a financier who had applied for registration certificate in respect of a repossessed vehicle. That application has been rejected by Ext. P6 for non-production of the original records. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies on Exts. P7 and P8 where this Court has dealt with similar issues. Taking note of the fact that the production of the original records was beyond the control of the petitioner and that its insistence is incapable of compliance this Court granted relief in identical circumstances. Therefore, following Exts. P7 and P8 this writ petition is also disposed of quashing Ext. P6 and directing that without insisting on the production of original records the application made by the petitioner for registration certificate will be considered by the 1st respondent in accordance with law and with notice to 2nd Respondent. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-