IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M-29542 of 2011 Date of decision : 04.11.2011 Vijay @ Raju ....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana ....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr.Naresh Kaushal, Advocate, for Mr.A.K.Rathee, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Mr.S.S.Chandumajra, DAG, Punjab. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 53, dated 15.01.2011, registered under Sections 376, 506, 120-B IPC, at Police Station City Panipat, Distt. Panipat, Haryana. On 28.09.2011, the following contention was noticed:- "Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that there is ample material to show that the prosecutrix was a married major and a perusal of the FIR would show that she had accompanied the petitioner with her own free will and the petitioner has now been in custody since 17.01.2011." Learned State counsel, on instructions of ASI Ranbir Singh, has accepted the factual assertion but argued that as per FIR, the petitioner had induced the complainant to accompny him and developed sexual relation with her on false grounds. Be that as it may, in view of the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 17.01.2011 and without commenting on the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner. Bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) November 04, 2011. JUDGE mamta