1 cp119.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Contempt Petition No. 119 of 2010 Sau. Sunita Ambadas Shirsath & anr. ....Appellants v/s. Punjaram Tukaram Shirsath & anr. ....Respondents Mr. M.M. Sathaye for the appellants. Mr. R.N.Gite-advocate for the respondent no.3. Mr. Suresh M. Sarbad for respondent no.4. CORAM: R.M. BORDE, J. 8th November, 2011 PC: The Counsel appearing for the Contempt Petitioner states that his client does not wishes to press the contempt petition as against respondents 3 and 4. The notice issued to respondents 3 and 4, therefore, stands discharged. 2. This Court while passing order on 15th October, 2004 in Civil Application No. 785/2003 in IInd Appeal No. 866/2002 restrained the respondent by order of injunction from disturbing the possession of the petitioner in respect of Land Gut No. 21. It is the contention of the Contempt Petitioner that the respondents have violated order of injunction and have committed breach thereof. The Contempt Petitioner is permitted to present an application as contemplated by Order 39 Rule 2A of CPC in pending Second Appeal. This Contempt Petition which is directed against respondents 1 and 2 need not to be taken cognizance of. The notices issued to respondents 1 and 2 stand discharged. The petitioner shall have liberty to file appropriate application under Order 39 Rule 2A in respect of alleged breach of injunction committed by the respondents. 2 cp119.10.sxw 3. Contempt Petition stands disposed of. (R.M.BORDE, J)