THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33227 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner states that he submitted an application seeking permission to construct a Function Hall in his land in Survey No.206/AA (old) etc., at Madinaguda, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and that he proceeded with the construction since no response was forthcoming within the stipulated time. The Corporation issued a notice under Section 636 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’) and ultimately, demolished the structure. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (for short ‘the Corporation’) is now insisting on him to remove the debris. He contends that the removal of debris would involve huge expenditure and that the Corporation cannot concern itself about the situation prevailing upon the site. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation. The structure raised by the petitioner was demolished and that was preceded by a notice under the relevant provisions of the Act. In case the Corporation intends that the petitioner must take any further steps, they must issue notice, duly citing the provision of law. They cannot insist on the petitioner to undertake certain activities without issuing any notice. Further, the Corporation cannot concern itself about the situation prevailing over the land of the petitioner, unless it is found to be in violation of any specific provision of law. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents not to insist on the petitioner to remove the debris or to undertake any related activities without issuing any specific written notice, duly citing the provision of law. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt: 25.01.2011. kdl