RFA No.337 of 1999 -1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.7116-CI of 2009 RFA No.337 of 1999 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.5.2009 Milkhi Ram ...Appellant. Vs. P.S.E.B.Patiala and another ...Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Dharampal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.S.K.Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.1. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J.(ORAL) CM No.7116-CI of 2009 Notice in the application was issued. Sh.S.K.Gupta, counsel for respondent No.1 has stated at the bar that the present appeal is covered by the decision of this Court rendered in RFA No.2748 of 1998 decided on 26.4.2006 and RFA No.582 of 1999 decided on 29.9.2006. In view of the above statement, the present application is allowed. Main appeal Heard. With the consent of both the parties, the main appeal is taken on Board for regular hearing. Both the parties are ad idem that the present appeal is squarely RFA No.337 of 1999 -2 - covered by the decision of this Court rendered in RFA No.2748 of 1998 titled as Surjit Singh and others Vs. Punjab State and others decided by Hon'ble Mr.Justice Viney Mittal on 26.4.2006 and RFA No.582 of 1999 titled as Milkhi Ram and others Vs. PSEB Patiala and others decided by Hon'ble Mr.Justice Viney Mittal on 29.9.2006. In view of the aforesaid statement, the present appeal is also disposed of in terms of the order passed in RFA No.2748 of 1998 titled as Surjit Singh and others Vs. Punjab State and others decided by Hon'ble Mr.Justice Viney Mittal on 26.4.2006 and RFA No.582 of 1999 titled as Milkhi Ram and others Vs. PSEB Patiala and others decided by Hon'ble Mr.Justice Viney Mittal on 29.9.2006. (Rakesh Kumar Jain) 25.5.2009 Judge Meenu