-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISIDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3377 OF 2004 Kokan Mercantile Co.Op. Bank Ltd. ..Petitioner Vs. Mrs.Shahida A.H.Mapari and others ..Respondents .... Mr.R.S.Pai i/b Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for Petitioner Mr.K.P.Anilkumar for Respondent no.1 .... CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. DATE : FEBRUARY 9,2005 DATE : FEBRUARY 9,2005 DATE : FEBRUARY 9,2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. It is clear that the impugned order in this petition is already under challenge in a Revision Application filed under Section 44 of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971 before the Industrial Court and therefore, it would be appropriate that this petition is disposed of without going into the merits of the impugned order and with directions to the Industrial Court to decide the Revision expeditiously. 3. Hence, the petition is disposed. -2- 4. The Industrial Court is directed to decide Revision Application (ULP) No. 166 of 2003 if pending as at present, on its own merits as expeditiously as possible and preferably within eight weeks from the receipt of writ from this Court. Ad interim order passed by this Court on 8.6.2004 stands vacated. . Writ to go forthwith. [ B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. ]