IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1058 of 2011 Radha Kumari . Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. . ----------- 3/ 20/07/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite parties. Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that the order stands complied vide Annexure- A to the show cause when the representation has been disposed. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a grievance that it is not in accordance with the directions of the Court and that no personal hearing was given. The Court has perused the order on the writ petition. It is apparent that the Court found the petitioner also to be severely wanting, but nonetheless permitted her to represent. If the opposite parties have then passed an order, the Court is not persuaded in the nature of the materials placed by the petitioner herself in the writ application as noticed in the order to proceed further in the contempt jurisdiction merely because personal hearing may not have been granted. If so advised, the petitioner may assail the fresh order passed in a fresh writ application. The writ application is disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)