IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1208 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3842 of 2008 ====================================================== Rupam Rai W/o Sri Arun Kumar R/o Vill. + P.O.- Dhurlakh, P.S.- Samastipur, Distt.- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner-Appellant Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Human Resource Development, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. The Head Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The Collector, Samastipur 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Samastipur 5. The District Education Officer, Samastipur 6. The District Superintendent of Education, Samastipur 7. The Block Development Officer, Jitwarpur , Samastipur. 8. The Block Education Extension Officer, Jitwarpur, Samastipur 9. The Supervisor, Block and Distt.- Samastipur 10. Smt. Janki Devi, Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Shambhupatti, Block and Distt.- Samastipur 11. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Shambhupatti, Block and Distt.- Samastipur 12. Raushan Sharma W/o Sri Shukhdeo Sharma R/o Vill.- Bhuidhara, P.O.- Dhurlakh, P.S.- Samastipur, Distt.- Samastipur .... .... Respondents-Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Rajesh Singh, G.P.-16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA Patna High Court LPA No.1208 of 2011 (3) dt.28-09-2011 2 / 2 2 ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 3 28-09-2011 Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 11th July 2011 made by the learned single Judge in above C.W.J.C. No. 3842 of 2008, the writ petitioner has filed the present Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. The matter at issue is the appointment to the post of Panchayat Teacher pursuant to the selection process commenced in 2006. The finding is that on 9th March 2007 i.e. on the date of counseling, the appellant was not present. She, therefore, was not appointed as Panchayat Teacher. In view of the said finding the learned single Judge has rejected the writ petition. Learned advocate Mr. Manoj Kumar has appeared for the appellant. He has strenuously urged that on the date of counseling the appellant was present, however, she was not found present on the date of selection. Be that as it may, in view of finding of fact against the appellant, Appeal is dismissed in limine. Pawan/- (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)