«^wSiK^';TS2 IN THE mGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR (Mf) WRIT PETITION^ L( ^ 4 OF 1999 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER ISGEC John Thompson a unit ofM/s Saraswati Lidustnal Syndicate Limited, A-245, Okhla Indusfaial Area, Phase-I, NewDelhi-110020 -Versus- RESPONDENTS •^ PresidingOfficer, Labour Court, Durg (under ID Act) Senior Manager (IR), Bhilai Steel Plant, Bhilai. Shri Ram Narayan Singh, C/o General Secretary, Chattisgarh Engineermg Karmachari Sansthan, 4-C, St., 63, HSCL Colony, Sector-6, Bhilai, Distiict Durg(MP) <foAT- X -2- 4. M/s.Goure Sundar Enterprises, H.I.G. - II. M.P. Housing Board, Padmnabhpur, Durg (M.P). s s ^::^^.^.. XI-HC-22 W^T"^? R^F^T^T '^HT^'Tllta ^~^r ^fpw^, '^t?^, l^roy .lA3:-f:.W..O.....?-.^.^.l4,..^- 16.10.a002 Shri P. Diwakar, counsel for khe petitioner. ^'I^N^ 'RTR^1* "3 ftT^t Tf^p^T? ^T 3TRR'3:iT^ ^. Shri Raabir Siagh, G.A. for r^spondent No. 1 Shri B,D.Guni, Counsel afipears on behatf of Shri F^ashaiit Mishra for respondent No,2. Shri Awadh Tripafhi, Couii^el for respondent No.S-Shri Ram Narayan Siagh who is also personajUy present io. the Court. None for respondent No.4. It 1s stated by the lea^ned counsel for fhe, petitioner I,A,No.277/2002 has been filed for disposal of the writ petiflon ia temis of fhe setdenient. The facts giviag rise to the p^tition arc fhat respondent No,3 was workiag as a Watchinaa iinder th^ petitioner-ISGEC John Thoinpson which is a Uxiit of Saraswati I4dustnal Syndicate Ltd,, that had entered iato a contract wifh fhd respondent No,2 for supply and erection of Boilers. The services ^f fhe said Respondent No.3 haviag been tenaiinated, he had approacljied tiie Laboiir Court which passed an ex parte award in. fa.vour of respondent No.3 and agaiast the j petitioner directlag the reiastatei4ent of respondentNo.3 with back .^-- \^-J we.-^-^.-^^-^,. Xi-HC-22 ^^' -s^ T,^'d1y^<o, ^dl^y •37r^-T^^ WW^T^W^ •M 200 ' f^^r ^Ti^T^T 1^lt^ 3TF^T ^THBT^T^i ' •/ 3n^i-^n^T Tffi^ — 2——- vfrrit wages, That award is fhe subjec{t petition. Duriiig fhe pendency of fhe efFected between fhe pardes gamfuUy einployed elsewhere has and back wages ia consideratio|a Rs.60,000/- The statement ofj recorded ia Court. He has wUreiinder coinproniise on his own free aayone, He admits his si^nature clearly stated fhat fhe petition ^•f^T^ TTp^f ^ ft^t ^T^R ^T 3TRTH '3Tf^T inatter of chaUenge ia fhis writ TTit petition, a coinproinise has been respondent No.3 who is given up his right of reiastatement of a lump sum payment of said respondent No.3 has been fhat he has entered into a st&ted w4l aad without any pressure from (^n I.A.No.277/2002. He has further jniay be disposed of in terms of coniproinise, Haviag heard leamed counsjel, the Court is of fhe opiaion that as fhe coinproimse is bona j&de aad as the respondent No.3 has aEGxed his signature on ttie said I.A, on jhis own firee wiU and accord, fhere caa be no legal unpediment in re< writ petition ia. terms of the ^jreeinent entered iato between fhe 1 .. „ . ... I. parties. Thetermsoffhecoxnproii^iseareasiiader:- ling fhe saine and disposiag ofthe ai) That the petiti<j>ner M/s ISGEC John Thoiapson has jagrced to pay and fhje —3f XI-HC-22 "5~^[ ^n^T^R, ^^1AJ4!^, t^TRTf; •W!?n"^w^" •M 2W 'ra^y H^ ^^T^t ^X^ 3Tit^T | "^Rwet^T ^^1 '^TT^R TfftH —3.° ^ ^TPT^Tf ^ tt^t 'd^RZIT •qT ^TRR .3iT??T ii) iii) respondent no,3 JShri Raxn Narayaa Siagh has grced to accept fhie sum ofRs.60,000/- ia full aad final sjsttlemeut of aU his claiois aad dues m respejct ofex parte award dated 08.08.97 passed ^n Case No.26 / IDA / 94 (Ref.) aad pronoulaced on 13,10.97 by fhe Presidiag Ofi&cer, j Labour Court, Durg, In view of the abo^e, fhe respon<lent no.3 relmquishes his jright of reiiistatement ia sendce as well aq back wa^es in above ex- parte order agaia^t respondents no.2 Bhilai Steel PIant and tiiie Pefitioner, ISGEC John Thompsoii. ! That conseque^it upon tiie above coinprojaiise, fhe| respondent no.3 Raca Narayan Siagh, s|iall not m future raise aay dispute or claim | upon fhe petitioner M/ s ISGEC John ThJompson aad respondent no.2, fhe niaaage^nent of Bhilai Steel Plant, shatl not iastitute asiy BhUai and also! further procee<p.iag inipleixientation nientatk)n of fhe fhe impugned aiid ia respect of / or non-miple- aforesaid ex-parte award, ex-parte award dated 08.08.97 and ^ronounced on 13.10.97 staads fuUy satisfied, That any ofher D^spute / claim agamst fhe petitioner M/s ISpEC John Thompson aad fhe inaaagexuLent) of Bhifcai Steel Plant, if aay, raised by r^spondent no,3 Shri Ram Narayaa Singhi pendmg before any Aufhority Tribunal / Coiirt / Forum shaU also be deenied tb have been withdrawn by virtue of fhis coinproinise, which has also been reduced to jwriting vide 'Annexui'e A-l? aiid has been explaiaed to xae (Mr,Ram ..^J. -.X XI-HC-22 <RT4^T^ ' l^il^CT^T '^^FT^ AOI i "^£[-^W^^, W^W^, fa<ni^y te^.'^-.^^aa, '^T<ST' loy 3Ti^T ^<TT^R TiT^T -IA- Narayan Siagh) ia Accordiagly, as fhe sum of respondent No.3, fhe impugned reiastatenient wifh back wages is s^t aside, Petition stands disposed of a<j*cordingly ^iqf?^fhr THTi^ff "^ f^-^ ^T 3T[^H .BTR^ Hindi/ ps.60,000/- has been rcceived by award ia so far as it dirccte Sd/- P.C. Naik Judge _^.ir_