IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4415 of 2008 SANJAY KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 30.11.2009 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the state. Petitioner has filed this application for quashing the order dated 25. 11.2008 whereby he has been terminated from the post of Block Teacher in compliance of the direction of Deputy Development Commissioner, Sitamarhi. Petitioner has also prayed for quashing the order dated 17.01.2008 whereby the Deputy Development Commissioner, Sitamarhi has directed for cancellation of petitioner’s appointment. Further prayer of the petitioner is for reinstatement in service with all consequential benefits. On perusal of the impugned orders, it transpires that the reason for termination is that petitioner’s name was not included in “PARAMARSH PANJI”. The termination order should have been challenged by the petitioner by filing Appeal before the District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, Sitamarhi. The District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, Sitamarhi will call for all relevant records and examine legality of the petitioner’s appointment. Accordingly, this writ application is being disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner for filing an appeal within 30 days 2 from today before the tribunal. In case of filing such an appeal by the petitioner, the Tribunal will consider merit of the appeal and pass order in accordance with law within the statutory period. AKV/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)