IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 21ST JULY 2011 / 30TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 26894 of 2010() ------------------------ PETITIONER : -------------------- THOMAS KOLLAPPILLIL, S/O.MATHAYI, KOLLAPPILLIL (H) CHERUPUZHA P.O. BY ADVS. SRI.T.B.SHAJIMON SMT.GOVINDU P.RENUKADEVI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, TRIVANDRUM-695 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY, THE KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, PILATHARA BRANCH OFFICE, PILATHARA - 671 121. 3. DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND CHIEF REVENUE OFFICE, KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, TRIVANDRUM - 695 001. 4. SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R.), THALIPARAMBA - 670 001. R1 TO R3 BY ADV. SRI.A.JAYASANKAR, SC, KSHB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 26894 of 2010() APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE SALE NOTICE. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R1A : LETTER DATED 9.7.10 TO PETITIONER. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.26894 OF 2010 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges recovery proceedings initiated by the respondents for recovery of loan amounts due from the petitioner to the Kerala State Housing Board. The petitioner seeks only time to pay off the amounts. This Court passed an interim order on 27.8.201, which reads as follows; “Admit. Issue notice to the 4th respondent by speed post returnable in 10 days. Sri. A. Jayasankar, the learned standing counsel takes notice for respondents 1 to 3. There will be an interim order staying further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1 fo sale of the security in the event of the petitioner depositing the sum of Rs. One lakh with the third respondent before the time fixed for sale in Ext.P1, and a further sum of Rupees One lakh within another six weeks thereafter. It is clarified that if the first instalment of Rs. One lakh is not paid within the time stipulated above, this order of stay shall stand automatically recalled.” On 13.7.2011, I directed the learned counsel for the petitioner to ascertain whether the interim order has been complied with. Even today, he is unable to say either way. Insofar as the liability is not disputed and the petitioner has not complied with W.P.(C)No.26894/10 2 the directions in the interim order, I am not inclined to further extend the indulgence of this Court to the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd W.P.(C)No.26894/10 3