IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46181 of 2008 TAJ MOHAMMAD @ MUKHIYA @ TAJUDDIN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.12.2008 Heard Mr. Vivekanand Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. The case is under section 366A of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that the petitioner enticed away the daughter of the informant. The lady Ruhi Pravin was produced before a Magistrate and she made her statement under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. According to which, she stated that she wanted to marry the petitioner to which her parents were not agreeable and, as such, she herself left the house of her parents to go with the petitioner so as to marrying him. Considering the above statement, let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.3,000/-(Three thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.5, Purnea, in connection with S.T. no.903 of 2008 arising out of (Supplementary) K. Hat Sahayak (Khajanchi) P.S. case no.100 of 2008. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )