,^ (•' '•fo IN THE HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH Misc. Appeal No. -5"37~72004 'ision Appellants:!. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Collector,. Bastar-Jagdalpur (CG) 2. Van Mandaladhikari, Bastar Samanya ' Van Mandal, Jagdalpur District Bastar 3. Range Officer, Block Bakawand Dlstrict Bastar-Jagdatpur (CG) :"" 3:'-!i'lw Kgp Respondents:l. fv l!aft!i!'»&i;|l Versus Smt. Sonmati, aged about 36 years, Wd/o late Lekhan, by Caste Halba, 2. Dhanay, S/o late Lekhan, aged 12 years 3. Mangatdakal, S/o late Lekhan, aged about 10 years, 4. Kanti, D/o tate Lekhan, aged about > 8 years, 5. Kirti, D/o late Lekhan, aged about 6 years, & ^t Bhomo @ Bhagwati, D/o late Lekhan, agedabout 4 years, T^ Sengo @ Saggo, S/o late Lekhan, aged about 1 year, 8. Laxman, S/o late Ratan, aged about 62 years, 9. Laxmi, W/o Laxman, aged 58 years, Respondents No. 2 to 7 all minors, through natural guardian mother Sonmati, Wd/o ate Lekhan, All resident of vlllage Rajnagar, Para Boraguda, Tahsil Jagdalpur District Bastar (CG) APPEAL UNDER SECTION 30 OF THE WORKMEN COMPENSATION ACT 1923. XI-HC-78 vjCT|-4l.yid^;tnB<(tlie,Rirti<H>^< ^,^,^o.537A<7^4: +tl«te>iapTIT^""""""""""/""""" an^ST q'rcp ('icitji.ri) 31I^?TtI5T.R!-li<l» ?TW3n^CTipTrt<R "'Wl!atei ^RTT8R:Hfia3I1^ST &B: Hon'ble Shri A.ICPatruik. C.J Honlile Shri Synil Kumar Siiil' 27.6,2005 Mr. P.5. Koshy, Dy. Advocal M.A. 537/2004 is an appe4 passed by the CommKSsioner f^ Courf, Jagdalpur in case No. B/56( On perusal of -Hie impugn^ working as 6uard in the office of Van Mandal in Jagdalpur bistri Bakawand District Bastnr-Jagdal 25.4.2003 because of thunder an< 1-riie electricity line in -tlie areahac| Straighten the pole and in the [contoct in the electricity wires| |Req»ondentNo. 1 -the wife of b'| children of late Lekhon and resp^ Imother of late L«khonfiled case |the Commissronw for Workmen's jorder dated 19.1.2004, the jawarded a sum of Rs. 1,70,795/- |10%. Aggrieved, the <ypelfc»ntsha< 4)t'l|fd'lil-1 *fl4d)'^r"feI&'<|u|1-SI'< ^aii^PTail^CT ' & fi.J. GenereS for -Ae tppelknits. against 1he order dajted 19.1.2004 ^r Workmen Compensation, Labour ^W-C. Fcrtal/C/1/03. kel order, we find -that LeWian was VCBI Monckiladhiknrj, Bdstar Samanya 'jst and Rcyige Officer from Block (>ur at 1+ie High-Tec Ptantation. On heavy rains a wooden pele, carrying fatlen on the earth. Ld<han tried to of ajch work he has ccme into ond was elect'roeuted and died. 1-e Lekhan, respondents 2 to 7 <ee i<)ndents 8 to 9 Sae the father and hlo. B/56/Wr Fortal/C/1/03 before [Compensation and by the impugned i(tissK>ner, Workmen's Cwnpensation |along with interest at the rote of flfe filed this oppeal. codrse Comiftisstoner, ^ vd-cq "t|l«lrt<4,yTtl*(1<IS, RlrtK+y; ^wv'iiwn^ 31T^9T IWP ('jpfgSR) W^200 a?I^9T<CT(i-lj<b a2iT3ii^aTsR*iN) l'a:il>(5'' N.>^ S^TtSRflfeT SirSiT 2-- The first proviso to Compensation Act, 1923 makes it| any order of 1he Commissioner High Court unless a substantnl oppeat. After hearing Mr". P.Sj appetlantsand ufter perusing the^ the Commissioner for Workmen'sl no substdntial question of knv inclined to entertain the c^peal application for condonation of 537 of 2004 as well as the said oj M.(C.)P. 7l3oL2QQ4) Sd/- . : ChiefJustice S^ction arlses de(ay <ti]uln41i *iM«Tt>'fe><l<lRi|+dl'( ^alRiq-in^ST 30 (1) of 1+ie Workmen's |clear that no appeal shall lie against (or Workmen's Compensation to the question of taw is invalved in •tfie Koshy, teamed counsel for the impugned order dated t9.1.2004 of |Compensation, weare satisfied that and for this reason, we «xrenot the application for stay cmd the i. Accordingty. we dismiss M.A. No. id o^plications (M.(C.)P. 712 of 2004 <nid Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge .-^ SP/FS/2005-20,000