THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No.11992 of 2010 ORDER: Petitioner approached this Court challenging the order dated 25.10.2010 passed by the XV Additional Judge-cum-XIX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, in Crl.M.P.No.7120 of 2010 in C.C.No.61 of 2010, whereby the learned Magistrate dismissed the application ﬁled by the petitioner/accused under Section 91 of Cr.P.C. to call for certain documents from the custody of the complainant. Heard. On a perusal of the impugned order, it is observed that the trial Magistrate, after perusing the entire records and on the basis of the evidence already elicited in the cross- examination of PW.1, decided the issue against the petitioner herein. Further, the learned Magistrate observed that the facts on which the petitioner wants production of the proposed documents are not elicited or no where it is averted in the cross-examination of PW.1 or in the proceedings. Further, it is also admitted by the petitioner that the said proposed documents are in the hands of the complainant. In such situation, passing an order in the application ﬁled under Section 91 Cr.P.C., for production of proposed documents, will not serve any purpose. The Court is always at liberty to decide the issue whether the proposed documents are relevant or not. Hence, the trial Court has rightly dismissed the application and this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed. ____________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO 30.11.2011 v v