IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18390 of 2008 DILIP SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14.7.2008 Petitioner, Dilip Sharma, is present in Court and Opposite party no.2 Babita Devi alias Ranju Devi is also present in Court. The Advocates of both the parties are also present. The learned Advocate of the petitioner informed the Court that the petitioner is ready to take his wife (opposite party no.2) with him and to keep her with dignity. The learned Advocate for opposite party no.1 informed the Court that the petitioner had kept a concubine and due to that, the opposite party no.2 was being tortured. I am of the view that there is no ground to refuse the prayer for bail of the petitioner who has already spent in jail for about six months. Considering the submissions of both sides, provisional bail granted to petitioner (Dilip Sharma) vide order dated 13.5.2008 is hereby confirmed with direction to the petitioner to take his wife with him and keep her with full dignity and if any torture is reported then the opposite party no.2 will move the court below for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. Let this order be sent to the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, Samastipur in Bibhutipur P.S. Case No.232 of 2007 through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. BT (Syed Md. Mahfooz Alam, J)