1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 3880 OF 2007 (Nagpur ZP Primary Teacher Co-op.Society Ltd. and others .v. Pradeep Vasantrao Chidamwar and another) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri Yogesh Shukla, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri S.S. Ghate, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Smt. I.L. Bodade, AGP for the respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. 8TH FEBRUARY, 2008. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. By way of present petition, the petitioners challenge the order dated 12th October, 2006 vide which the petitioners were directed to regularise the services of the plaintiff/respondent No.1 as an Attendant or any other suitable Class-IV post. Shri Yogesh Shukla, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the learned Industrial Court has erred in passing the impugned order inasmuch as there was no permission by the District Deputy Registrar to regularise the services of the complainant. He further submits that there is no post available with the petitioners to accommodate the respondent No.1. The learned Counsel, therefore, submits that the impugned order 2 is not sustainable in law. On the last occasion, the learned AGP was requested to verify the position from the District Deputy Registrar regarding the vacancy of the Class-IV post with the petitioners. Accordingly, Smt. I.L. Bodade, the learned AGP has placed on record the copy of the communication addressed by the District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Nagpur. From the perusal of the said communication, it is clear that there are four posts vacant in Class-IV category. One of the said posts belongs to General Category. In that view of the matter, the contention of the petitioners that there is no post, is not correct. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. However, the petitioners are directed to send the proposal to the respondent No.3, District Deputy Registrar for grant of approval to the appointment of the respondent No.1 within a period of two weeks from today. On receipt of the said proposal, the respondent No.3 shall grant ex-post- facto permission for appointment of the respondent No.1. JUDGE *rrg.