sn^i ^BI (<•){<* ^^\ 3TI^?T Sft*iicb a" -\\ -F ^WVtt tb*dch '3's^ '*ii<iicriai, ^tily'iic, fqini'yy . ^P(SJ ^<~t;8i SiI^T 'V^K ('i'lt^'^) TOiiwaf^i 3n^?i PETITIONER Babbjaa Tiwari, aged about 51 years, S/o Shri Brijbihari Tiwari, Rcsidcnt of Kho4gliapani (west) Jhagrakhaad, Distric- L(CG) Latc Kho4s Koret. RESPONDENTS 1. Stat of Chhattisgarh, through -Secretaiy, Dep^rtment of School Education, Mantralaya, JS. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) D.K.ji 2. The Kore|a, 3. Priidarv Thrc|ugl Edut (CG)j 4. The Pen; S.B. HON'BLE SHRI DHIREdDRA MISHRA. J. 30.09.2008 Shri R.K. Jaiswal, coup.selfor the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy <=bi^ld4i'f ^{N^?E ^ i^S\ <fflft$f< ^istRnailt?! Versus Pistrict Education OfiScer, Korea, District- ja, C,G. School North Jhagarakhaud, jugh Headinaster, Singhi CoUieiy j;ation Society, Jiiagarakhaad, Uistt.-Kora Du-ector, Directorate, PubUc Institution, ion Bada, RaipTir (CG) Writ Petitioa U/A 226/227 ofthe Constitutioa ofladia &A for the State. Heard. With the consent oftht parties. the inatter is heard finallv. By fhis petition, the Teacher ia Piimary School, petitiouer, who is working as Assistant Jhagrakhand, District-Korea is clauning ttie benefits of 5dl Pay Comjaussiou at par with their counterparts in the Govenuneat Schools. Tljie 5th Pay Commission was to be graated ^s"^ fS^:^ 1 laii.'ljS-B^71 t>.,^ ti~,>_ '•'. ""-^aess XI-HC—78 sn^i^iTf^iN? "^sn STI^T $f)^iq) '3"^ •<<i<iici<4, ®tily're,f^ciKHy u> -p. cs7 s~ ^aj *ii*iMTa»w^> •^, 200 3> Kltan sn^r irsFEp (ipfgsi^q) TOTOR ^lft?! 311^1 with efFect from 1.1.1996 RevisionofPayRules, 1998 This Court by the jud ofSmt.A Lall Vs. State of|Chhattisgarh aad ofher connected matters (W.P. No.4108 of 2005) held that fhe teachers workuie in Govenunent aided schools are eD.titled fdr fhe beiiefit of recominendations of the 5ih Pay Commission. After th^ ffled fhis isetition on 25.9.2008 clauniue the same relief. Leamed counsel app authorities are accordiQRy dated 2.8.2008 (Annexurel accordaiice witli law, on it^ t^l14ii?l-^'1 'WT?if ^f 1^1!^ 'tf^-^K ^aJfirqslT^I iu accordance with fhe Madhva Pradesh .nient and order dated 6.2.2007 in. the case decision of fhis Court, fhe petitioner has ;aring for the petitioner submits that fhe petitioner has m.ade repres^ntation ou 2.8.2008 (Annexure P-2) to the respondents authorities, wh|ich was not considered at aU. In view of ti.ie fact tbat the reoresentation of the petitioner is pendiag consyeration beffjire authority concemed, the respondents directed to cousider his representation P-2) nendine before resuondent No.l in. own nierits, in the light of fhe judginent and order dated 6.2.2007 p^ssed by fhis Court iu fhe matter ofSmt. A Lall (Supra). | _ __,__ . The petition is accordjuigly disposed of. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge nr