[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.2047 OF 2008 Smt.Aruna Devanand Kharat ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and other ..Respondents ... Mr.C.B.Mali Advocate for Applicant Ms.P.P.Shinde APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 10, 2008 DATE : JULY 10, 2008 DATE : JULY 10, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in CR No.A-62 of 2007 of Railway Police Station, Kalyan. The said case is mainly under Sections 394 and 307 of IPC. 3. The prosecution case is that the complainant Vimal was travelling in local train. When the train came near the over-bridge, the applicant came near the complainant and tried to get down as the [-2-] local train was slow. At that time, she snatched gold chain from the neck of the complainant. Complainant Vimal resisted while the applicant was snatching the gold chain, hence, the applicant pushed the complainant from the train. Due to this, the complainant fell down from the local train and she received serious injuries on her person. The medical certificate shows that the complainant had sustained fracture. 4. The chain has been recovered at the instance of the applicant. Applicant has been identified by the complainant in test identification parade. Beside this, there is another case against the applicant i.e. CR No. 248 of 2003 of Powai Police Station. The said case is under Section 379 of IPC. 5. Looking to the above facts, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant though she is a lady. Application is rejected and is disposed of accordingly. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]