IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17026 of 2009 RAM BRICHH KEWAT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 27.5.2009. Heard both sides. Petitioner who is the father-in-law of the complainant has approached this Court seeking bail in a case instituted under Sections 498A, 376/511 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code as also Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation interluded at paragraph no.7 of the complaint is for ulterior motives. He is aged about 65 years. It is contended that having regard to the allegations and the fact that a complaint case was earlier lodged by his son ( husband of the complainant) against the present complainant and her family members, the present case has been lodged. It is further pointed out that subsequently the husband ( son of the petitioner) has lodged a suit under Section 9 of the Conjugal rights. It is further contended that he is in jail custody since 15.10.2008. Referring to the paragraph no. 14 it has been contended that the husband and mother-in-law of the complainant have since been released on bail. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Ram Brichh Kewat is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, - 2 - in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 112 of 2008 corresponding to G.R. No. 1393 of 2008. U.K. (Kishore K. Mandal)