t^ HIQH COURT OF CHHATTISQARH: BIU^SPUR Writ PetJSIon {227S HG. 71 BS of2808 Petitioner/ Pro&ossd Non-ADpiicant. Shekhar Sahu, 34 years, S/o. Thes Ram Sahu, ViJS. Bhateil, PS/PO Bhakham, Dhamtari. Resgonderrts A&p'icanSs and Non- Aooijcants 4. Versus Vyas Narayan Saftu, 50 years, S/o. Shn Ram Sshu. Smt. Keja Bai, 45. 1 & 2 Wo. Kopedih, PO Chandi Bazaar, PS Abhanpur, Raipur. Ataur Rehmaan Khan ^ Attu S/o. Daut Khan, R/o. Taj Nagsr, Santoshi Nagar, PS Tlkrapars, Raipur. Bharat Daga thro' Shanker Stationery, Wo. Civi! 'Jne, Raipur. (Writ Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of Indta) SB: Hon'ble ftflr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Mr. Raja Sharma, counse! for the petitioner. ORALQRDiR (Passed on thls 5th day of Jsnuapy, 20©8) Learned counsej appearing for the petitioner submits that the Court beiow Le,, the Commisstoner for VVorkmen Compensation, RaiDur, has impieadecS the petitioner on the application made by the resp©ndentsNo. 1 and 2 wrthout having, prima facie, satjsfactron asto whether the petitioaer was Tti any way connected with the work or not, The compteinant^respondents No. 1 and 2 have a?so not made any averment in the complaint asto indicate whether they are aggrieved by any action of the petitioner or they cfalm any relief from the petjtioner. 2) On perusaf of the impugned order dated 23-7-20)8 (Annexure P/1), tt is evident that the court below has impteaded the petitioner on prima facie satisfaction observing that the issue Jnvolves proper consideration on examtnation of witnesses and other evidences. in vievy of that, the order is ^.•,^^^^ /y/^' '^^ ^^^•" ^' Raju just and proper and cioes not warrant interference. Hlo^@veiF<^tiberty is resewed to the petitioner to raise all ttie issyes inciuding ques'lion of his impleadment before the court betow at appropnate stage. 3) tn view of the foregoing, the petitfon is dismissed. _,__ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge