MAC.APP.No.212/2009 Page 1 of 2 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP.No.212/2009 % Date of decision: 10th November, 2009 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO; LTD. ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. versus REKHA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr. P.K. Sisodia, Adv. for R-1 to 6. Mr. Akshay Anand, Ms. Sonam Nagrath and Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advs. for R-8. CORAM :- THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? JUDGMENT (Oral) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the learned Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.13,34,000/- has been awarded to the claimants. The appellant seeks reduction of the award amount. 2. The learned counsel for the claimants/respondents No.1 to 6 submit that the claimants had preferred an appeal against the impugned award being MAC.APP.No.155/2009 which was heard and decided by this Court vide judgment dated 7th July, 2009 in the presence of learned counsel for the appellant. MAC.APP.No.212/2009 Page 2 of 2 3. The learned counsel for claimants/respondents No.1 to 6 submit that appellant has deposited the entire award amount along with interest and the judgment dated 7th July, 2009 stands satisfied. 4. In view of the judgment of this Court dated 7th July, 2009 in MAC.APP.No.155/2009 arising out of the impugned award, this appeal is dismissed. 5. All pending applications also stand dismissed. 6. Copy of this order be given ‘Dasti’ to learned counsel for both the parties under signature of Court Master. 7. The LCR be returned forthwith. J.R. MIDHA, J NOVEMBER 10, 2009 mk