IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 14TH JUNE 2007 / 24TH JYAISHTA 1929 RP.No. 53 of 2005() ------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN CRP.431/2001 Dated 25/08/2004 RCA NO.247/1996 OF ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, THALASSERY. RCP NO.300/1995 OF ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT, KANNUR. .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------------ ARAYAKKANDY PARAYIL SURESHAN, S/O. KRISHNAN, BUSINESS, PALLIKKUNNU AMSOM, DESOM, KANNUR TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.RAMADASAN RESPONDENTS: REVISION PETITIONERS ------------------------------------------------------ 1. CHERUMANALIL KOTTIATH KARATHAN @ ORU THAVAZHI THARAWATTILE ONNAM UPPATHAVAZHIKKARANAVAR K.P.CHANDRASEKHARAN, ADVOCATE S/O. YESODA, RESIDING AT TALAP WARD, KANNUR II AMSOM, KANNUR TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. BROTHER, K.P.JAYAKUMAR, PENSIONER RESIDING AT PALLIKKUNNU AMSOM DESOM, KANNUR TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.R.KESAVA KAIMAL THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANTONY DOMINIC, JJ. =============================== R.P. NO. 53 OF 2005 IN C.R.P.No.431 of 2001 ====================== Dated this the 14th day of June, 2007 O R D E R Radhakrishnan, J. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the shop rooms has been vacated and the landlord has been put in possession of those rooms. In the circumstances, the review petition is dismissed as infructuous. Even otherwise, no grounds have been made out for entertaining this review petition. K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp