IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 2ND SEPTEMBER 2010 / 11TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 27085 of 2010(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ALEXANDER MAMMEN, S/O. MAMMEN ALEXANDER, AGED 22 YEARS, RESIDING AT G-110, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, COCHIN-36. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI SRI.BRIJESH MOHAN SRI.T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH SRI.T.R.SADEESAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM-686560, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSII HILLS KOTTAYAM-686560. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.27085 OF 2010() -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B. Tech Degree Course in Computer Science. In the campus selection he got appointment as evidenced by Ext.P1. However, when the result of the 8th semester examination was declared, he had failed in one paper. He applied for revaluation and approached this court to expedite the revaluation. 2. Although the learned Standing Counsel for the University points out the practical difficulties and stated that the revaluation can be done in the order of priority in terms of the regulations, still I am not impressed by the said objections. This is for the reason that if the revaluation is inordinately delayed, that will result in the petitioner loosing the job opportunity and therefore it is essential that giving priority, the answer paper should be revalued. 3. Therefore I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 6 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. WPC.No. 27085/2010 :2 : Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondents for compliance. ( ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/