WP(C) 5221/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY The petitioners were casual employees engaged under the Golaghat Electrical Sub- Division and had offered their candidature for filling up the regular vacancies of Sahayaks. However they were not selected and accordingly the present petition is filed alleging anomalies in the process of selection. 2. Mr. P J Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioners refers to the order passed by this Court on 26.8.2011 (Annexure-D) in WP(C) No.4344/2011 (Bijit Chan gmai & 6 ors. Vs. The Assam Power Distribution Co, Ltd. & 7 ors.) to show that a n inquiry on the selection was ordered by the Court. 3. Mr. H K Sharma, the learned standing counsel, Assam Power Distributioin Co. Ltd. submits that an appropriate decision will be taken by the respondents i n pursuant to the direction given by this Court in Bijit Changmai (Supra). 4. Mr. Saikia states that the petitioners have filed a representation on 2. 9.2011 to consider further casual engagement of the petitioners till a further d ecision is taken by the respondents. Mr. H K Sharma, the learned standing counse l submits that the respondents doesn’t object to consideration of the petitioner s’ representation. 4. Considering the above, the competent authority of the Respondents is dir ected to take a decision on the pending representation (Annexure-E) of the petit ioners which is dated 2.9.2011. For enabling the necessary consideration, the pe titioners will furnish this order along with a copy of the writ petition with al l annexures. An appropriate decision will then be taken within a period of 6 wee ks from the date of receipt of the requisites from the petitioners. 5. The case is disposed of with the above order.