- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1046 OF 2008 Ms Sai Paranjpye & Anr. .. Petitioners Vs. The Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited. .. Respondent -- Ms Armin Wandrewala along with S/Shri Hiren Mehta and Sheikh Yusuf, advocates i/b Akshay Vani, Advocate for the Petitioners. Ms.S.I.Shah, Advocate i/b S.I.Shah & Co. for the Respondent. -- CORAM : SRI R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & SRI A.A.SAYED, JJ DATED : 8TH AUGUST, 2008 P.C. . The learned advocate for the respondent states that, after going through the records, neither the authority has been able to locate any documentary proof about payment of dues claimed from the petitioners, nor the petitioners have been able to produce any documentary proof as such about the clearance of all dues. However, in the circumstances, giving benefit of doubt, the respondent is waiving its claim and is prepared to refund the amount which was directed to be deposited by the petitioners with the - 2 - respondent. In the circumstances, nothing survives in the matter. While directing the respondent to refund the amount which was deposited pursuant to the Court’s w Order, the petition is disposed of. ( R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J ) ( A.A.SAYED, J )