1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.378 OF 2008 Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi ....Petitioner. V/s Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane District & Others. ..... Respondents. ----- Mr. S. Mahadeshwar i/b Ms. R.J. Todankar for the Petitioner. Mr. Ramchandra Yadav i/b Vijil Juris for respondent No.2. ----- CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND V. M. KANADE, J. DATE : 22ND APRIL, 2008. P.C.: 1. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 submits that they have already applied for being registered with the Security Guards Board and have also made a request to them to supply the Guards. In view of this statement, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner states that this Petition does not survive. Nobody is present on behalf of the Board. 2. In view of the statement made by respondent No.2 Writ Petition 2 is disposed of. No order as to costs. 3. It is further clarified that in relation to registration of the Petitioner with the Board, the matter is fully covered by the two Division Bench Judgments of this Court in the case of Security Association of India Vs. Union of India and Ors in Writ Petition No.1804 of 2007 with other connected Writ Petitions decided on 26th March, 2008 and in the case of Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi Vs. The Security Guards Board for Gr Bombay & Thane Dist. & Ors in Writ Petition No.563 of 2007 with other connected Writ Petitions decided on 21st June, 2007. CHIEF JUSTICE V.M. KANADE, J.