IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 14561 of 2000 Between: 1 K.Anji Reddy , S/o. Late Papi Reddy R/o. Bairamulguda, Saroornagar Mandal, R.R.District. 2 K.Sathi Reddy, S/o. Late Papi Reddy R/o. Bairamulguda, Saroornagar Mandal, R.R.District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceilings, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Hyderabad. 4 Government of A.P., Rep by its Prl. Secretary Revenue (UlC), Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 5 Parvath Singh S/o. late Manna singh 14-10-1488 & 89 Chowrajinsi, Machilipura, Hyderabad. 6 Vijay Singh S/o. late Manna singh 14-10-1488 & 89 Chowrajinsi, Machilipura, Hyderabad. 7 Anand Singh S/o. late Manna singh 14-10-1488 & 89 Chowrajinsi, Machilipura, Hyderabad. 8 Surender Singh S/o. late Manna singh 14-10-1488 & 89 Chowrajinsi, Machilipura, Hyderabad. RR 5 to 8 impleaded as per court order dt. 8-10-2004 in WPMP 21179 of 2004 9 Niranjan Singh S/o. Manna singh 14-11-727, Choraja jinsi, Machilipura, Hyderabad. R 9 impleaded as per court order dt. 8-10-2004 in WPMP 23027 of 2004 10 G. Satyanarayana S/o. late Venkatanna H.No.16-2-740/61, Kalyananagar, Gaddiannaram, Hyd 11 G. Saradamma W/o. Jeeveswar H.No.16-2-740/61, Kalyananagar, Gaddiannaram, Hyd RR 10 & 11 impleaded as per court order dt. 21-11-2005 in WPMP 31288 of 2005 .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:MS. P.BEENA FOR MR.G.V.KRISHNA REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “In the circumstances we pray that it is just and necessary that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue and order or direction or writ more appropriate in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the orders of the Respondent No. 1, the Special Oﬃcer and Competant Authority, Urban Land Ceilings, Hyderabad that the petitioners father is holding excess land at 53033.85 sq.mtrs under the provisions of the ULC Act as irregular, improper, null and void and consequently direct the respondent not to dispossess the petitioners from the lands bearing sy.nos.44 to 48, 57 & 58 of Bairamulguda Village, Saroornagar, R.R.District.” At the hearing, Ms. P.Beena, learned counsel representing Sri G.V.Krishna Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 30th JULY, 2008. kvni