IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 8TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 26852 of 2008(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- RAJESWARI @ RAJAMMA, AGED 56, D/O.KALYANIKUTTY, THETTIKKOTTU HOUSE, PERUMBAVOOR VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, PERUMBAVOOR MUNICIPALITY, PERUMBAVOOR. ADV. SRI.V.M.KURIAN FOR R2 G.P. SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/09/2008, ALONG WITH WPC NO. 26870 OF 2008 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).Nos.26852 & 26870 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 30th day of September, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioners in these two writ petitions are challenging the orders of the Municipality, whereby the applications for building permits submitted by them have been rejected on the ground that, as per the master plans prepared by the Municipality, the land in question is shown as paddy field. When the question was put to the counsel for the petitioners as to why the petitioners cannot file appeal against those orders, the counsel seeks some time to file appeals. In the above circumstances, these two writ petitions are disposed of with the following directions: The petitioners in these two writ petitions shall file appeals with petitions for condonation of delay, before the appellate authority within two weeks, along with certified copies of this judgment. The same shall be considered taking note of the fact that the petitioners had been prosecuting these writ petitions bona fide. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2