IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32810 of 2009 NITISH KUMAR SON OF LATE YUGAL MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DURJANCHAK, P.S. SAKASOHARA, DISTRICT PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. REKHA KUMARI @ TUMMI KUMARI WIFE OF NITESH KUMAR, R/0 DURJANCHAK, P.S. SAKASOHARA, DISTRICT PATNA ----------- 09. 01.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It is submitted that the present complaint case has been filed against the petitioner and his family members in retaliation of the divorce case filed by the petitioner vide matrimonial case no. 371 of 2008, alleging adultery on the part of this complainant in the said divorce case. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that the allegations made in the complaint are of demand and torture which was committed by the petitioner during the pregnancy. Considering the serious nature of allegation with regard to demand and torture, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the same is rejected. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)