..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.181 OF 2008 Mrs.Madhuri Hemant Shirodkar. ..Applicant. Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Sanjiv A. Sawant, Adv. for applicant. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for respondent No.1-State. Mr.G.H.Keluskar, Adv. for respondent No.2. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 24th July, 2008. DATED : 24th July, 2008. DATED : 24th July, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant-orig.accused, the learned advocate for respondent No.2-orig.complainant and the learned APP for the State. 2. By judgment and order dated 4.8.2005 the applicant was convicted by the learned J.M.F.C., Pune under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to suffer SI for six months and to pay fine of Rs.8 lakh. Out of it Rs.7,95,000/- was to be given, by way of compensation, to the complainant ..(2).. Trust. Being aggrieved, the applicant preferred Criminal Appeal No.295 of 2005. By judgment and order dated 21.2.2008 the learned Sessions Judge dismissed the appeal. Being aggrieved thereby the present Revision has been preferred. During pendency of the Revision, the applicant has deposited an amount of Rs.8 lakh. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has deposited the entire amount before this Court. She is a lady. He has submitted that looking to the above facts, the sentence of imprisonment may be set-aside. 4. Mr.Keluskar states that if the complainant is forthwith allowed to withdraw the amount which is deposited in this matter by the applicant, the complainant will not seriously insist on the sentence of imprisonment. 5. Looking to the above facts, the conviction of the applicant under Section 138 of N.I. Act is confirmed. The sentence of fine and compensation is also confirmed. However, the sentence of imprisonment is set-aside. The ..(3).. respondent-complainant is forthwith allowed to withdraw the amounts which has been deposited by the applicant in this matter. 6. Criminal Revision Application is disposed of in above terms. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)