1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.2854/2001 (Ku. Vrushali d/o Rameshwar Parate .vs. The Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee Nagpur and another) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr. G.R. Agrawal, Advocate for Petitioner. .......... CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : OCTOBER 8, 2009 Heard. Pursis dated 8.10.2009 along with letter dated 21.9.2009 and acknowledgment filed by the counsel for the petitioner is taken on record. Perusal of the letter dated 21.9.2009 and the acknowledgment disclose that the advocate for the petitioner has informed the petitioner that in case she fails to contact him, he will report no instructions in the matter. According to Mr. Agrawal in spite of the receipt of the communication dated 21.9.2009, the petitioner has not contacted him and, therefore, he states that he has no instructions in the matter. When the matter is called out, neither the petitioner nor any counsel is present on behalf of the petitioner. Hence the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. JUDGE JUDGE halwai