1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.24 of 2010. Sau.Kirti @ Anjali w/o Ritesh Ragde ..vs.. Ritesh @ Anup s/o Kamalsingh Ragde =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.A.N.Ansari Adv. h/f Mr.Dangre for the applicant. Mr.Abdul Bashir Adv. for the respt. C ORAM : Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota,J. DATED : 27th January, 2010. The applicant-wife has filed this application under Section 24 Civil Procedure Code for transfer of divorce petition No.A-231/2007 filed by the husband from the family court at Nagpur to the court of Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Bhandara. The application is opposed by the respondent. The applicant-wife has been staying with her parents at Bhadara since the time of marital discord. She claims that she has to suffer physical inconvenience in travelling to Nagpur from Bhandara for contesting the matter. She is also required to make arrangement for 2½ years’ old child and therefore seeks transfer. 2 Learned counsel for the respondent submits that since now the matter is listed for final hearing; that is for recording of evidence, which would get over within a couple of dates, no transfer will be required. On a query from the court the learned counsel for the respondent states that he will be examining three witnesses in the matter and the Advocate for the applicant states that he would be examining about 4 to 5 witnesses in the matter. In that circumstance, the matter is likely to take a longer time. Considering the personal difficulties of the applicant, this application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (i). The petition No.A-231/2007 pending in the Family Court No.3 Nagpur is transferred to the court of Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Bhandara. JUDGE. chute