Wt ffi1 in:i Bl...':^:-!- ^Ml -s'l^'i.';^^ •[t": t^'^.y^M ;i;?lsi^ i» INtHEM.RlSTATEADMINISTRAnVETRlEI ORIGINAL APPLICATION N0. LRAIPUR OF19< APS^ICANT : VERSUS NON-APPLICANT/ FiESPONDENTS BALDAU RPFiASADSHARAMA {Ex. Asstt. Teacher.pravlouslyappointed on adhoc basls) S/OSHFII CHIHONJILAL SHARAMA AGEABOUT 39YEAFIS, , FI/0-VILLAGE -AMALDIHA, TAH.-RANDAFtlYA,. DISTT.-BILASPUFI (M.P.) /7; STATEOFM.P..THROUGHCOLLECTOR, BILASPUR, DISTT. B!LASPUR(M.P.) (2) COMMISSIONEFI OFPUBLIC INSTRUCTiONS.GOVERNMENTOFM.P., DIRECTORATE OFEDUCATION(DPI OFFfCE)NEAffCHETAKBRIDGE, BHOPAL M&) (3) DEPUrirDIRECTOHOFPUBLIC\ INSTFiUCTIONS, ' EDUCATIONDISrr. BILASPUR EDN. DEPTT. P.O.BIiASPURM.P. APPLIGffTtON UNDERSEGnfi)N19;OFTHEADIVItNSISiaa5l»ETRIBUNALACEig85 (N0.130F1985)READWITHA)RTICLES14&l60FTHEt;©NfSTtTUTlONOFffilDIA 'a "31 -'ai s aiaa fflMi SII ::ISSI ...ss ^iA^: A' 1^'t; il.A: HIGH GOURT OF CHHATTISOARHAT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BIiE MR.SATISHK.AGNIHOTRI.J. Petitioner WMTPETITIONTS.1N0.23910F200S Baldau R Prasad Sharama versus Resppndents State ofM.P. and otfaers S'SSSSKIBII S.IBSISSiB 'SWiS Present : Mr. A.N.Bfaakta, counsel forthe petitioner. Mr. ^ay Dwivedi, Paael Lawyer for the respoa^rits/State. ORDER (Passedon7alofSeptsmber,2006) !ai i It is submitted that tfae facts and question of law involved in the present petition are same tb that of m Malihvm Sidw and others vs.State ofMcidhya Prcidesh widothers (Onpnal Application No.624/1997): The Madhya Piadesh Admiaistrat e Tribunal, Jabalpur, by its judgment and order dated 22-3-1997, allbwed the appUcatton ofthe peUtioners therein. (Leamed counsiel fiir the petitioner seeks permisskm ofthis EtouTtj to ^ respondents^tate ^consideration ati^^lispo^^^l^ •f:'i^ w^ iii^j.!'i <' ^- •,?''.' 'Sf:r. 'i. ~':. saa •B IIIIII ease mtermsoftheorderdated 22-3-1997 passed ia the case of Malikram Sidar covl others (Supra) by Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tjnbunal, Jabalpur. 2. LeamedcounseIappearingfortheraspondente./State fairly agrees with the submissions made by leamed counsel for the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, fhepetitioner isgranted libertyto make a representation before the respondents - State Authorities for their decision on the representation in the light ofthe order dated 22-3- 1997 passed ui^^casscfMalikrcmtSic^w^^^ (Supra), ia accordance wiftt law, on its own merit, witfun reasonable time. 4. With the above-steted liberty, this petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Certified copy as per rules. ^i^'ljffi^^ ^iiii?I^IIfc M^WSKSs. :.l:RligiBB illiffll t:ljii ^nl-'i' ii^H ;:^lli^: 111 r i;;]:lil:l Hlll •jllllj :! I i li !• !: :! : ; i.'s' !;.