1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 5. FA/589/2009 WITH FA/590/2009 WITH FA/591/2009 WITH FA/592/2009 WITH FA/593/2009 WITH FA/594/2009 WITH FA/595/2009 WITH FA/596/2009 WITH FA/597/2009 WITH FA/598/2009 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. N.H.Borade, AGP for the appellant. Mr.M.S.Karad, Adv., h/f Mr. S.S.Thombre, Adv.,for respondent. ... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 9th July, 2009 ... P.C.:- 1. Heard learned A.G.P. And learned Counsel for respondents/land owners. The group of appeals, at the instance of State, is disposed of finally at admission stage, without calling the record. 2. The controversy revolves to the sale 2 deed Exh.30 which is basis for fixing the market value of the lands, subject of acquisition dt. 19.6.1997. The sale deed ( Exh.30) shows that it is of irrigated land. It is just one field away from the field of petitioner in one of the case. The land of the petitioner is of superior quality than the land which is referred in sale instance ( Exh. 30). PW No.2 has sold his land survey No.195 admeasuring 9 R. for consideration of Rs.11,000/- vide registered sale deed dt.3rd Sept.,1992 (Exh. 28). The market price was accordingly Rs.1222/- per R. The learned Judge has also perused index II at Exh.28, of the sale deeds and ultimately reached a conclusion that even by application of 10 per cent addition, as the sale instances are of 1991, while the notice under Section 4(1) is of 1997, has calculated the enhanced amount at the rate of Rs. 960/- per R. The calculation at this rate, in the fact situation, is in terms and in tune with the sale instances. There is apparently no error by the learned Judge. 3. The table given at paragraph no.26 highlights even the care taken about the amount on which interest under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act is to be paid. The appeals lack merit and are dismissed. No costs. (K.U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/fa589-09gr