Lsp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1239 of 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8085 of 2003 Geeta Shrikrishna Narvekar & ors. ...Applicant V/s. Dayal Keshav Narvekar & ors. ...Respondents Mr. P.S.Dani for the applicant. Mr. V.S.Gokhale for the respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. DATED DATED DATED : 19TH JANUARY, 2009 : 19TH JANUARY, 2009 : 19TH JANUARY, 2009 P.C. . Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the reply affidavit and the sketch at page-17. Although this application is opposed by the respondents, I am inclined to grant the limited relief claimed by the applicants in the interest of justice. The objection of the respondents is that this is one more attempt of the applicants to harass the respondents. Besides, if the limited relief claimed in the application is to be granted, it is likely to cause inconvenience to the respondents. In my opinion, both these submissions are ill founded. The limited relief claimed by the applicant is to permit him to take water connection and to install a sink in the portion near the kitchen platform. The applicants through Counsel assure that the applicants will not provide for any water storage 2 tank facility after taking independent water connection. Besides, the applicants are willing to install the water connection and the sink near the kitchen platform at their own cost after taking prior permission of the Municipal Authorities. In view of this limited request, the application is allowed to that extent only. The respondents shall extend necessary co-operation to the applicants for seeking water connection from the Municipal Authorities. . Application disposed of on the above terms. [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.] [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.] [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.]