1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6564 of 2011 Decided on: 19.8.2011 Satya Devi ....Petitioner Versus The Director of Panchayati Raj Deptt. & others …Respondents The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:- “Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents for releasing pensionary benefits to the petitioner or further submits that consider or decide the case of the petitioner in accordance with law.” 2. The petitioner has already submitted Annexure P-6, representation and the same is pending before the respondents. There will be direction to the first respondent to look into 2 Annexure P-6 and take appropriate action in accordance with law and disburse the eligible benefits to the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the first respondent. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. August 19, 2011 (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (hl) Judge.