IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20368 of 2009 1. BANARSI PASWAN, son of Harhangi Paswan 2. Satendra Paswan, son of Banarsi Paswan, both resident of village Tilai, P.S. Sanjhauli, District Rohtas at Sasaram Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.9.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for the State as also the informant. Considering the fact that the allegations made by the informant himself to have sustained injuries in the Fardbeyan stand corroborated from the injury report, this Court for time being is not inclined to release the petitioners on bail even when it would find that only two fire arm injuries are on the person of the informant (injured) and those are said to be subsequently scribed to co-accused Gorakh Mahto and Surendra Paswan in paragraphs 8, 18, 19, 20 and 21 of the case diary. This much however remains a fact that the petitioners were also named to be assailant by the informant, who is himself the victim and injured and therefore, the prayer for bail of the petitioners, who are said to be in custody since 4.2.2009, is rejected for the present 2 and they would be only released on bail after completing one year of their judicial custody i.e. on or after 4.2.2010 by the court below on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Bikramganj, Rohtas (Sasaram) in Sanjhauli P.S.Case No. 73/2008. Let it be noted that the case of co-accused Gorakh Mahto and Surendra Paswan stands on a different footing in view of the materials in the case diary. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/