BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Second day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14013 of 2011 1 TAVASU 2 KARUPPU ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEELAVALAVOO POLICE STATION, MELUR, MADURAI DISTRICT IN CRIME NO. 143 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.MP.AMALAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are accused in Cr.No.143 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offence under Sections 147, 148, 341, 324, 307 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police, the petitioners are before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of the prosecution, due to previous enmity, the petitioner along with other accused, with a view to kill him, assaulted the de facto complainant with aruval. The first petitioner/third accused along with the first accused, attacked the de facto complainant on his right hand; the 2nd petitioner/4th accsued attacked him on his right shoulder. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would deny the above allegations. Though the petitioners were known people to the de facto complainant and all belong to the same village, in the first information report, the petitioner's names do not find a place. Subsequently, during the time of investigation, the de facto complainant mentioned the names of all these accused. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.I have considered the above submissions. 5.Having regard to the above fact that though the petitioners were known people to the de facto complainant, he did not mention their names in the F.I.R., prima facie, the petitioners have made out a case for grant of anticipatpry bail. Hence, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with the following conditions: 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur,on each executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,00/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum ot the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. sd/- 02/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MELUR 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEELAVALAVOO POLICE STATION, MELUR, MADURAI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. S.MP.AMALAN Advocate SR.No.38013 rl/6c – 4.11.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14013 of 2011 Date :02/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/