IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9512 of 2011 BHRAMAR KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 02. 23.06.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application has been filed for setting aside the order dated 20th of December, 2010 passed by Sri Om Prakash, Principal Judge, Family Court, Begusarai in Divorce Case No.37 of 2006 whereby the prayer of the petitioner for amendment of the plaint has been rejected. From perusal of the impugned order at page 2 it appears that learned Court below considered the conduct of the petitioner who was plaintiff in the Court below who tried to get ex-parte decree in the case by filing compromise application. The petitioner was recalled for his cross- examination but he did not appear nor he gave any further evidence and then his evidence was closed. Thereafter again on the prayer of the petitioner, the order was recalled on payment of cost. However, thereafter also instead of appearing of his cross-examination, the present application was filed for amendment. In such view of the matter, I find no reason to interfere with the impugned order in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. Saurabh ( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)