THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.14214 of 2010 Dated 30th August, 2010 Between: Mohd. Jaffar and another. …Petitioners And Station House Officer, Santhosh Nagar P.S., Hyderabad and others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri Vedula Srinivas Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3: Assistant Government Pleader for Home Counsel for respondent No.4: Sri K. Harish Kumar The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to direct respondent Nos.1 to 3 to act in accordance with the order dated 27.01.2009 in I.A.No.80 of 2009 in O.S.No.514 of 2009 on the file of VIII Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, by preventing respondent No.4 and his associates from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners in respect of the property comprised in plot Nos.49(P) and 50, bearing No.18-8-225/7/50, Habeebnagar, Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad. I have heard Sri Vedula Srinivas, the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri K. Harish Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No.4. A serious dispute persists between the petitioners on the one side and respondent No.4 on the other with respect to the above property. The petitioners have filed O.S.No.514 of 2009 in the Court of VIII Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. In the said suit, they have filed I.A.No.80 of 2009 for an injunction against respondent No.4. An ad interim injunction was granted in the said I.A. on 27.01.2009. As respondent No.4 was allegedly interfering with their property despite existence of the order of injunction, the petitioners have filed I.A.No.770 of 2010 for a direction to respondent No.1 to grant Police aid to effectuate the order of injunction. The present writ petition is filed for a similar relief on the ground that the said application is pending for a long time. In my opinion as the petitioners have availed the appropriate remedy of approaching the civil Court, which granted the order of injunction, for Police aid, it is not appropriate for this Court to interfere at this stage till that remedy is fully exhausted. The learned counsel for the petitioners, however, submitted that though the said application is pending since February, 2010, the civil Court has not disposed of the same, compelling his clients to file the present writ petition. In the light of the above grievance of the petitioners, the learned VIII Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, is directed to dispose of I.A.No.770 of 2010, after hearing both the parties, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.Nos.17882 and 18587 of 2010 are disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 30th August, 2010 Note: The Registry shall forth communicate this order to the learned VIII Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. (B/o) GHN