IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 8TH JULY 2011 / 17TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 14009 of 2011(A) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- SANTHOSH KUMAR. K.K, KOTTARATHIL, PERUNILAM, POONJAR, POONJAR THEKKUBHAGAM VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES (KSFE), TRIVANDRUM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, PIN-695 001. 2. SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD., M.D. COMMERCIAL CENTRE, KOTTAYAM, PIN-686 001. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN,SC, K.S.F.E. LTD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 14009 of 2011(A) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 06/01/2009. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 16/12/2008. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 06/01/2009. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 06/01/2009. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 6/01/2009. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 14009 of 2011 ================== Dated this the 8th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges the revenue recovery proceedings initiated by the Kerala State Financial Enterprises through the 2nd respondent for recovery of defaulted chitty instalments. This Court issued the following interim orders: 25.5.2011: “Standing counsel is directed to get instructions and to file statement, if so advised. Meanwhile, further recovery steps on the basis of Ext.P1 to P5 shall be kept in abeyance subject to condition of the petitioner remitting a sum of Rs. 1,25,000/- (Rupees one lakh Twenty five thousand only) on or before 15.6.2011. Post on 20.6.2011.” 21.6.2011: “The prayer for extension is opposed by counsel appearing for the respondents. However, considering the averments contained in the affidavit filed in support of the I.A., time stipulated for payment is extended till 5.7.11 making it clear that no further extension will be granted under any circumstance and on failure the writ petition will be dismissed. Post on 8.7.2011. Needless to say that (sic) the interim order will continue till then.” Admittedly, the petitioner has not complied with the conditions in the interim orders. The petitioner does not dispute the liability to pay or the quantum. Since the petitioner has not availed of the benefit of the interim orders, by complying with the directions therein, I am not inclined to extend any further indulgence to the petitioner. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2