IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3384 of 2006 M/S KALIKA CONSTRUCTION HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT KALI CHOWK, WARD NO.6, AT & P.O. ROSERA, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR THROUGH ONE OF ITS PARTNERS KAILASH KUMAR DAS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF CUM ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER CUM SPECIAL SECRETARY, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. CHIEF ENGINEER (ROADS) NORTH BIHAR SUB- DIVISION, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, DARBHANGA 4. SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, ROAD CIRCLE, DARBHANGA. 5. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, ROAD DIVISION NO.2, MUZAFFARPUR. 6. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, ROAD DIVISION, MADHUBANI. 7. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, ROAD DIVISION SAMASTIPUR. 8. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER CUM SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, ROSERA, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR. 9. THE JUNIOR ENGINEER, SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICE, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, ROSERA, DISTRICT – SAMASTIPUR. ----------- 7. 02.03.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. A supplementary counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent-State stating to the effect that all admissible payments in respect of the matter in question have been made to the petitioner, as detailed in paragraph-5 - 2 - of the affidavit. As such the application has become infructuous and deserves to be dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on the other hand, submits that it is incorrect that the entire amount payable to the petitioner has been paid and the payments made, as detailed in paragraph-5 of the affidavit, have been made after certain deductions which the State was not liable to make. Learned counsel for the State, however, submits that the petitioner should be given liberty to make representation to the concerned authority with regard to his left out grievance in this regard. In view of the submissions made above, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make representation before the concerned authority with respect to the left out grievance, if any, within a period of three weeks alongwith the certified copy of the present order. In case, such representation is filed by the petitioner, the competent authority shall consider and dispose of the same by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of six weeks on receipt of such representation. JAGDISH/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)