IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH C.M.No.2276-CII of 2009 & C.R.No.2845 of 2008 Date of order : 29.1.2009 Barkha Ram ......Petitioner(s) Versus Ram Sarup and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH JASWANT SINGH,J(ORAL) C.M.No.2276-CII of 2009 Application is allowed. Annexures R.1 to R.5 on behalf of respondents No.1 to 5 are taken on record. C.R.No.2845 of 2008 By filing this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner-plaintiff has prayed for setting aside order dated 8.4.2008 passed by learned Civil Judge(Jr. Division), Kurukshetra whereby his application for providing police help in order to implement injunction order dated 10.12.2007 has been rejected. Learned trial Court has found that there is nothing on the file to establish that the application moved before the SHO concerned has been dismissed. Respondents-defendants are taking the stand that they are not, in any manner, violating injunction order. It is also stated by learned counsel for the parties that an application moved U/o 39 Rule 2-A CPC filed by the petitioner-plaintiff for violation of injunction order is pending. It has been further stated by learned counsel for the parties that another application moved by the petitioner-plaintiff for restoration of the possession is pending before the learned trial Court. C.R.No.2845 of 2008 #2# Learned counsel for the parties make a joint prayer for directing the learned trial Court to decide that application seeking restoration of possession one way or the other by passing a speaking order. Request is accepted and the learned trial Court is directed to decide the aforesaid application seeking restoration of possession at the earliest. In view of the same, present petition stands disposed of. January 29, 2009 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manoj JUDGE