1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR First Appeal No. 92 of 2000 Sampatlal and anr v. Radheshyam and ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Mr J.J. Chandurkar, Adv for appellants Mr V.R. Chaudhari, Adv for respdts Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J. Dated : 8 th December 2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that in view of judgment of this Court in Manohar v. Bhaurao reported in 1995 (2) Mh.L.J. 336, appeal against impugned judgment and order would lie before the District Judge. Looking to the valuation and perusing judgment cited, I am satisfied that appeal would lie before the District Judge. Office is, therefore, directed to transfer the proceedings to the District Judge, Gondia for disposal according to law. Judge. Hsj