C.R No. 1112 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R No. 1112 of 2010 Decided On : 22.02.2010 Ghasi Ram and others ...Petitioners versus Daya Nand and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate, for the petitioners. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying for quashing of order dated 25.04.2008 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jhajjar vide which the application of the plaintiff for injunction was accepted and against the order dated 16.04.2009 passed by the District Judge, Jhajjar vide which the appeal preferred by the defendant now petitioner was dismissed. The plaintiffs (now respondents) have filed a suit for permanent injunction claiming that they are in possession of the suit property as tenant. The case of the defendants is that father of the plaintiffs had already relinquished the possession in the year 1972 and thereafter, petitioners purchased the land from its previous owner vide Sale Deed dated 28.07.1972. C.R No. 1112 of 2010 -2- The learned trial Court, after hearing both the sides and going through the records reached to the conclusion that the plaintiffs now respondents are in possession. Consequently, their application for injunction was accepted vide order dated 25.04.2008. Feeling dissatisfied with the above said order, the present petitioners filed the appeal, which was also dismissed vide order dated 16.04.2009. Feeling dissatisfied with the above said orders, the present revision petition has been filed by the petitioners. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The order is dated 16.04.2009 and it has been challenged after a period of about 8 months. No reason has been given for not challenging the same earlier. Otherwise also, both the Courts below have arrived at the conclusion that the plaintiffs are in possession of the suit property on the basis of revenue record. No contrary document has been placed on the file. Consequently, the revision petition is without any merit and the same stands dismissed. However, it is made clear that any observation shall not be construed as an expression on the opinion on the merits of the case. FEBRUARY 22, 2010 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE