IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-30984 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 13, 2011 Pardeep Kaur and another ….Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. L.S. Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioners. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Both the petitioners are present in person before this Court. I have examined personally both of them. Both of them have stated that respondent No.4 is the brother of petitioner No.1 and he is aged about 11 years only. Since, respondent No.4 is only 11 years, therefore, petitioners seem to be wrong in saying that they are having life threat from respondent No.4. Both the petitioners have further stated that they have filed the present petition to get their marriage approved from this Court. Section 482 Cr.P.C. or Article 226 of the Constitution of India should not be allowed to be invoked to approve/disapprove the alleged marriage. Dismissed. October 13, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge