@ t^ ^ gi.g^Sn.j »- R>"Si3»t8B IN THE HIGH COURT QFLJUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition fC.) N0. /2011 PETITIONER ^. to/o Ragini Chouhan G/o Shri Malik Ram, R/o A.B. 1199-1200, Kaveri Vihar, N.T.P.C. Jamnipali, District Korba (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^...-" ^^ o^^-y .'••n4:"'^' .'»••• s-'^y |i&&t^l^ \^.S^SSS' •y 1. National Thermal Power Corporation, Through : Senior Manager, Human Resources Department, N.T.P.C. Sipat, Ujwal Nagar Shopping Complex, Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Deputy Manager N.T.P.C. Sipat, Ujwal Nagar Shopping Complex, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to subm.it as under : 1) PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER:- As stated in cause title above. T/ 2) PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: As stated above in cause title. ^ ..r \.i^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRJT_PETmQN (C) N0.563 OF 2011 PETITIONERS Ragini Chouhan RESPONDENTS Versus National Thermai Power Corporation & Another Gowri (Writ Petition underArticle 227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Y.C. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri B.D. Guru, Advocate for the respondents. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 2nd day of August, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner being a land oustee, under the scheme of rehabilitation, a shop was allotted to her after due scrutiny of her application, vide letter dated 4-3-2010 followed by issuance of a licence in favour of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that on the strength of interim order granted, the petitioner is continuing in the shop. He also submits that the application for renewal of licence has already been made by the petitioner, which is pendmg consideration. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits thaf there is no application for renewal of the licence. The validity of earlier licence has come to an end on 11 -2-201 1. 4. Be that as it may, without going into the merits of the case, it is directed that if the applicafen of the petitioner is pending consideration for renewal of licence, the same may be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible. Ifthere is no application, no relief can be granted to the petitioner to continue in the shop without renewal of licence. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge T'l: