IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15187 of 2010 RANJEET RABIDAS, SON OF LATE NARSHING RABIDAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 25.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 25(1-b), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution case is that three persons including the petitioner were seen fleeing away waiving their Arms at which they were caught and Arms were recovered from their possession. From the possession of the petitioner, a Musket was recovered and it appears that even the motorcycle they were riding was stolen one. Moreover, the petitioner after having been arrested in the present case, was remanded in another case under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code converted in a case under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the serious nature of the offence. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)