THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR WRIT PETITION No.22863 of 2011 Dated:19.08.2011 Between: V.Nagaraju. … Petitio And The Chief Executive Officer, Z.P., Medak at Sangareddy, And others. ... Responde THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR WRIT PETITION No.22863 of 2011 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) The petitioner’s Original Application, being O.A.No.1648 of 20 assailing the order dated 16.03.2011 passed by the first respondent he placing the petitioner under suspension under Rule 8 of the Andhra Prad Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1991, was dismis by the Tribunal on 08.04.2011. Being aggrieved, the petitioner is before Court invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution of India. The petitioner is at present working as Senior Assistant in the Offic the Mandal Parishad Development Officer (MPDO), Ramachandrapur Medak District. A report was sent by the MPDO on 15.03.2011. It was repo that the petitioner has maliciously issued fake medical reimbursem proceedings in the name of the District Collector and Magistrate, Medak order to avoid Income Tax in respect of one Sri Basheer Mohinuddin, A.E (PR), Mandal Praja Parishad, Ramachandrapuram. While proposing to cond enquiry into the allegation and informing the petitioner that he will be entitle be paid subsistence allowance as per FR 53, the order dated 16.03.2011 w passed placing the petitioner under suspension. The petitioner mainly contended that he has been subjected to hos discrimination and concerned A.E.E was not touched, whereas the petitio was singled out for disciplinary action and placed under suspension. This not weigh with the learned Tribunal. Counsel for the petitioner submits that except the report of the MP dated 15.03.2011, there is no other material before the first respondent to co to the conclusion about involvement of the petitioner in the alleged issue of f medical reimbursement certificate to enable another Officer to claim Income exemption. We are afraid, we cannot countenance the submission. allegation made by the MPDO is a very serious one and when the compe authority contemplates enquiry into such serious allegation involving a pu servant, it is for such authority to place the employee under suspension or n In this case, by a reasoned order the first respondent placed the petitioner un suspension. The same is not vitiated by any vice nor hit by malafides. The writ petition fails, and is accordingly dismissed without any orde to costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO ________________ (K.G.SHANKAR 19.08.2011 vs