J' J \..-- £^:^<.. ' ff^ <7^^3^:^' v-^ ^•^yy ^ 'MRj F' RFMf'H tS'^^i-aEL. E3,£f^.^' y << ?--;? ^rv adm'THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (CtNO. -zio /2011 PETITIONER Superintending Engineer (OSsM), Through - Harsh Gautam S/o Late Shri S.B.SheuTna, Aged about 51 years, Working as Superintending Engineer (OSsM), Circle, CSPDCL, RaipUT-(C.G.) VERSUS ^ RESPONDENT : M/SNutanIspatgsPowerPvt.Ltd., Village & Post Jaraouda, Distt. ' Raipur-fC.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCEOF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION. CBRTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. To, The Hon'ble ChiefJustice and his Companion Justices of the Hon'ble HighCourt of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur HIGHCOURTOFCHHATnSGARH.BILASPUR ^ PETITIONER RESPONDENT W.P.(C)No.210of2011 Superintendjng Engineer (O & M), Through- Harsh Gautam S/o Late Shri S.B. Sharma, Agedabout 51 years, Working as Superintending Engineer (O & M), Circle, CSPDCL, Raipur-(C.G. Versus M/s Nutan Ispat&PowerPvt.Ltd., Villageand Posttlaraouda, District Raipur (C.G.) WciLPetitioa UnderArticle226/2270fTheGonstifutionOflndia ADDearance: Mr. Sunil Otwani, Advocate forthe petitioner. ORALORDER (21.01.2011) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard. Mr. Sunil Otwani, learned counsel forthe petitioner, afterarguing for sometime, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to filea review petition before the concerned authority in light of the order dated29.10.2010 passed in Petition No. 34 of 2.010 (M) (Annexure-P/8) by the Chhattisgarh State Electricify Regulatory Commission. Permission granted. Accordingly, writ petition is djsposedof aswithdrawnwith the aforesaid liberty granted in favour ofthe petitioner._ Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge