-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.30 OF 2006 Shri Madhavrao Dattatraya Gaikwad : Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashra & Ors. : Respondents ... Mr.Pratap Patil for the petitioner. Mr.P.N.Joshi for respondent nos.5 to 7. Mr.C.G.Gavnekar with Mr.Hiranandani and Ms Deepa Sawant for respondent no.8. ... CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & S.A.BOBDE,JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 06, 2008. P.C. 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that unauthorised stalls have been removed as had been prayed by him in the petition and, as such, the Public Interest Litigation has become infructuous and is, accordingly, dismissed. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent nos.5 to 7 (stall owners) submits that only stall owners were removed whereas the unauthorised shop-keepers were not removed and the stall owners were also not rehabilitated. If the -: 2 :- respondent nos.5 to 7 want to agitate any grievance, they are at liberty to approach the Court, but in this Public Interest Litigation, no relief can be granted. (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (S.A. BOBDE, J.)