BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Third day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.9347 of 2011 LAKSHMI KANTHAN ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 Vs. STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE BRIDGE POLICE STATION, CRIME NO.675/2011, TIRUNELVELI JUNCTION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.RAGAVENTHRE Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.1 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 52,53(A),63 and 68(A) of Copy Right Act, in Crime No.675 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner arrayed as A1 in Crime No.675 of 2011 under Sections 52,53 (A),63 and 68(A) of Copy Right Act. He further submits that when the respondent has inspected the musical shop on 21.07.2011 he was found that 216 film DVD's without having valid licence. A2 to A4 are the employees of the shop were arrested and released on bail. The present petitioner is the owner of the shop and he apprehending arrest and hence, he pray for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor fairly conceded that the case has been registered against four persons and A2 to A4 were arrested and enlarged on bail and the investigation is going on and he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions, due to the ride made by the respondent police was found that 216 film DVD's without having valid licence. A2 to A4 are the employees of the shop were arrested https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ and released on bail and the present petitioner is the owner of the shop and no previous case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Tirunelveli, and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Tirunelveli, and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 03/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV, TIRUNELVELI. 2 -Do-Thro' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE BRIDGE POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI JUNCTION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S. S.RAGAVENTHRE Advocate SR.No.26106 akm/05.08.11 /2p-6c/ ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9347 of 2011 Date :03/08/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/