IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28938 of 2010 MAHESH PRASAD VERMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 11.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 2.6.2010 in a case registered under Sections 467, 468, 471, 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 103, 104 of the Trade Mark Act, Section 63, 64 of the Copy Right Act and Section 33 (I) (eec), (eea) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act 1940. It is alleged that the house of the petitioner was raided when petitioner was found preparing spurious Pudin Hara in place of Dabur Pudin Hara. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is house owner and he has let out portion of the house to one Subodh Kumar and the recovery has been made from the rented portion in occupation of Subodh Kumar. Considering the aforesaid submission, let the petitioner namely, Mahesh Prasad Verma be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief 2 Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Brahmpura P.S. Case no. 101 of 2010. Learned Court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner if he fails to appear on three consecutive dates or gets involved in similar nature of offence. Anand Kr. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)