IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28459 of 2008 AMIR KHAN & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioners are accused in a case registered for the offences under Sections 323, 324, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioners is to the effect that they all came to the land of the complainant and assaulted the complainant as well as his brother. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present complaint has been filed on account of land dispute as complainant and the petitioners are coparcener. He further submits that all the injuries are simple in nature. Learned counsel for the State submits that there is specific allegation against petitioner no.6, Sarif Khan @ Arif Khan who assaulted and took away the money from the pocket of the complainant. Having considered the submissions as noted above and the materials brought on record, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioners, namely, Amir - 2 - Khan, Yusuf Khan, Sanul Khan, Aklakh Khan, Sannu Khan and Majur Khan be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Complaint Case No. 278 of 2006 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. So far as petitioner no.6, Sarif Khan @ Arif Khan is concerned, considering the nature of allegation and submission of the parties, I am not inclined to grant bail to petitioner no.6, Sarif Khan @ Arif Khan. Accordingly the same is rejected. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)