1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 3656/2003 (Dadarao Laxman Bhalavi VERSUS State of Maharashtra & 2 others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mrs. S.W. Deshpande, counsel for the petitioner. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : DECEMBER 8, 2009. Mrs. Deshpande, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that this writ petition was filed before this Court as the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal was not functioning at the relevant time. Now, the Presiding Officer is appointed and the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal is regularly functioning. In this view of the matter, the learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file the appropriate proceedings before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal. Permission and liberty, both, are granted as prayed for. The counsel for the petitioner states that the revision would be filed before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal within a period of two months from today. 2 The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No order as to costs. JUDGE APTE