AB 698/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.K.MUSAHARY Heard Mr. P. Bora, learned counsel for the accused petitioner. Also hear d Mr. B. S. Sinha, learned Addl. P.P., Assam. CD, as called for, has been produced today. On an earlier bail application moved by the present accused petitioner in connec tion with Amguri P.S. Case No. 34/2010 u/ss. 341/302/34 IPC read with Section 25 (1)(a)/27 of the Arms Act, this court vide order dated 24.05.2010 passed in BA 2 050/2010, observed, as under: In view of the above, I do not find any apprehension of the arrest of the petit ioner in connection with the aforesaid case. Accordingly, this application invok ing the jurisdiction on Section 438 Cr.P.C. is not attracted in the case in hand . Mr. Bora, learned counsel, submits that he has produced the certified copy of th e abovementioned order before the Investigating Authority but for some reasons, the investigating authority is trying to implicate him and arrest him in connect ion with the abovenoted case. I have gone through the CD. It reveals from the CD that no incriminating materials is available against the present accused petitioner. In view of the above, it is directed that in the event of arrest in connection w ith Amguri P.S. Case No. 34/2010 u/ss. 341/302/34 IPC read with Section 25(1)(a) /27 of the Arms Act, accused petitioner, namely, Sri Sunil Das, shall be enlarge d on bail on his execution of a bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with one local surety of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the arresting authority on the condition that he shall make himself available before the investigating authori ty as well as learned trial court as and when required. The bail application stands disposed of.