Crl. Misc. No. M-21747 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-21747 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 30.7.2010 Kuldeep ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Yogesh Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner. Rajan Gupta, J. (oral) This is a petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in a case registered against the petitioner under Sections 376, 451, 506 IPC at Police Station Madhuban, District Karnal, vide FIR No.105 dated 1st June, 2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case, offence under Section 376 IPC is not made out and thus, no useful purpose will be served by detaining the petitioner in custody any longer. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and given careful thought to the facts of the case. The FIR was lodged on a statement made by Rajkali wife of Gulab Singh that on 31st May, 2010 when her husband was away for work and both her children went to sleep, the petitioner barged into her house and caught hold of her. He threatened her that in case she Crl. Misc. No. M-21747 of 2010 2 shouted, she would be killed. Thereafter, he committed rape on the complainant. The petitioner was arrested on 2nd June, 2010 and is in custody since then. I am of the considered view that in view of the seriousness of the allegations, the manner of commission of crime and the punishment it would entail in case of conviction, the petitioner does not deserve to be enlarged on bail. The petition is devoid of merit. The same is hereby dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 30.7.2010 'rajpal'