1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICMTURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 5375 of 2008 M/s Yadav and anr v. SBI and ors ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr Anand Jaiswal, Adv for petitioner. Mr Anil Kumar, Adv for respdt no.1. Mr Anand Gode, Adv for respondents no. 2 to 25 except respdts 12 & 15. Coram : D.D. Sinha and A.P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 19th January 2009 1. Heard Mr Anand Jaiswal, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr Anil Kumar, learned counsel for respondent no. 1 and Mr Anand Gode, learned counsel for respondents no. 2 to 25 except respondents no. 12 and 15. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though the petitioner has filed Appeal No. 200 of 2008 before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai against the impugned order dated 29.4.2008 passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal, since the Appellate Tribunal did not grant circulation to 2 the petitioner for urgent order in the said appeal, the petitioner has filed present writ petition. Learned counsel for respondent no.1 Bank has submitted that he has no objection if the matter is mentioned before the Appellate Tribunal for necessary orders by the petitioner in Appeal No. 200 of 2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner has brought to our notice that auction of the property in question is scheduled on 4th February 2009. 3. In the backdrop of the above-referred facts, we permit the petitioner to mention the matter before the Appellate Tribunal for orders on interim relief and we also expect the Appellate Tribunal to grant circulation before 31.1.2009. With these observations and direction, writ petition is disposed of. Judge. Judge. hsj