1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2536 OF 2008 1.Pamela May Julian & another. ...Petitioners. vs. 1.The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents. --- Mr.Kishor V. Tembe, for Petitioners. Mr.S.N.Joshi, AGP for Respondents 1 & 2. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 8th July,2009. P.C.:- 1. The learned Counsel appearing for Respondent nos. 1 and 2 places on record a copy of the order dated 4.7.2009 made by the Respondent no.2. It is taken on record and marked X for identification. The 2 learned Counsel further states that if the order passed by the Respondent no.2 dated 28.7.2004 remains in force and the order at X is not implemented within the time given, the Respondent no.2 will take necessary steps to get that order implemented immediately after expiry of the period which is mentioned in the order at X . The statement is accepted. In view of the statement, no further orders are necessary in the petition. The petition is disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.)