HON'BLE SHRI G.S.SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE W.P. NO.6722 OF 1995 Between: Annabathuni Durga Rajeswari and 18 others. .....Petitioners AND The Commissioner & Director of Sugars, A.P. 1st floor, Allwyn Show Room, M.J.Road, Hyderabad and 2 others. .....Respondents ::ORDER:: Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri Ravishanker Jandhyala Counsel for Respondent No .1 : The Government Pleader for Cooperation. Counsel for Respondent Nos.2&3 : Sri S.V.Bhatt Dated 5/9/2006 In this petition, the petitioners have made the following substantive prayer. “It is therefore necessary in the interest of justice that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to declare the decision of the Selection Committee constituted by the 1st respondent dated 4.1.1994 to cancel the orders of appointment issued to us by the management of 2nd respondent appointing us on regular basis in our respective posts, and the consequential notice published by the 2nd respondent on the notice board canceling the orders issued to us appointing us regularly in our respective posts as void, illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction by issuing writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, with a consequential direction to allow us to function in our respective posts in the 2nd respondent factory and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” Learned counsel for the petitioners says that the writ petition has become infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such. Ordered accordingly. As a sequel to the disposal of the writ petition as infructuous, W.P.M.P.No.8331 of 1995 is also disposed of as infructuous. G.S.SINGHVI, CJ msv.