IN THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.t MISC. APPEAL HO. .^~c^' _ 0_F 2006 APPELLANT t ^(^(F- S^M-/" y .'• ^-^•- RESPQNDENTS ^Bedram Suryawanshi, aged about years, Son of Shri Vilap Suryawarishi, Occupation- Contractor, Resident of Village Mangl'a, Police Station Civil Lines Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS {< 1. Sanju Kumar Yadav, aged about ^ 20 years, Son of Shri Krishna Yadav, Resident of Village and Post Bharni, Police Station Chakarbhata, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 2. Smt. Saroj Chandrol, aged about tears, Wife of Shri Hardeonarayan Chandrol, Resident of Police Line, Police Station Civil Lines, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.). M EMO OF APPEAL UNDER SECTION 30 OF THE WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT Ct^- v.\ ."s^ ....MA..ftJ.a.:.k-S.^ w^C^i ^giWHfeisn^i DBsHON. SHRI N.K. AGASiWAL & HON.SHRI G. MINHAJUDDIN, JJ. 16.08.2011 •3TOfeHN •qTq?S^ ttist TfWSR •^aiRCTsn^ None for ffae appellan^ Shri Sunil Otwani, co^insel for respondent No. 1. Shri Gautam. Khetrap^l, coiinsel for respondent No.2. When the inatter is caUed out for hearing. none had appeared for tlie appeUant tn niatter is passed over. Evenl appeared on behalfofthe appj Since no one appears] j representation is inade on hid no option except to dismiss fb^ appeal for non-prosecution. Accordingly, fhis ap^ prosecution. Sd/- N.K. Agrawa! Judge the first round; fherefore, fhe in. fhe second round, none ;Uaut. for fhe appeUant nor aiiy behalf, titiis Court is left witbL ;al is dismissed for non- Sd/- G. Minliajuddin Judge Ei