IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9569 of 2008. Decided on: 27.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Kailash Bhardwaj and others. … Petitioners. Versus Municipal Corporation, Shimla. … Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate vice Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Mr. Shrawan Dogra, learned counsel for the respondent, on the basis of instructions imparted to him submits that petitioners No.2 to 6 have been regularised. Petitioners No.1 and 9 have left the job. Petitioners No.7 and 8 are on contract basis and are presently working in the Corporation on secondment basis from the H.P., PWD. In case some action is to be taken, that is required to be taken by the Himachal Pradesh Public Works Department. Consequently, the petition is disposed of having become infructuous. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to claim the wages for the period they had worked, by 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - making separate representations. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 27, 2010. (sck).