IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16471 of 2011 Bibi Nafisa Khatoon Versus The Union Of India & Ors ---------------------------------- 02. 22.09.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel, Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1 and 4. The injunction application filed by the plaintiff- petitioner under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 read with Section 151 was rejected by the trial Court finding that the plaintiff has got no prima facie case nor balance of convenience is in his favour nor he shall suffer serious loss and irreparable injury. The said finding was confirmed by the appellate Court in Misc. appeal No.20 of 2010 / 1 of 2011 by terms of Judgment dated 4th July, 2011. From perusal of the Judgment of the appellate Court, it appears that the learned Court below considered various documentary evidences produced by the parties in relation to injunction matter and after considering those materials at paragraph 8 has clearly recorded that the petitioner has got no prima facie case and balance of convenience is also not in his favour. It is well settled that if one possible view has been taken by the Court below, the High Court will not the other possible view in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction. In view of the above finding, the same cannot be interfered with in supervisory jurisdiction. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)