CR No.5237 OF 2008 - 1 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR No.5237 OF 2008 (O&M) Date Of Decision: 27.10.2009 **** Nishi Kant Bhatia . . . . Petitioner VS. Estate Manager & Others . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for the respondents ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) 1. This revision petition is directed by the plaintiff against the order dated 12.09.2008 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhari, whereby, the appeal preferred by the respondent-Housing Board against the injunction order dated 25th October, 2007 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jagadhari, has been allowed and after setting aside the above-said order dated 25.10.2007, the ad interim injunction application has been dismissed. 2. The above-stated Civil Suit has been filed by the petitioner-plaintiff challenging a Notice dated 21.11.05 served upon him by the Housing Board restraining him from raising any construction on property bearing House No.2745, Sector 17, Housing Board Colony, HUDA, Jagadhari. CR No.5237 OF 2008 - 2 - 3. While issuing Notice of Motion, operation of the impugned order dated 12.09.2008 passed by the Additional District Judge was stayed. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I am of the considered view that instead of interfering with the impugned order, it would be desirable to direct the Civil Court to expedite the proceedings and decide the controversy at the earliest. Suffice it to say that, if the petitioner has already renovated/repaired the house purchased from the Housing Board on leasehold basis, it would cause irreparable loss and injury in the event of demolition of that house during the pendency of the suit. 5. For the reason afore-stated, the revision petition is disposed of with a direction that while interim order dated 26th September, 2008 granted by this Court shall continue to operate, the learned trial Court shall make an endeavour to decide the Civil Suit as early as possible and preferably within six months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. 6. Disposed of. 7. Dasti. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 27.10.2009 vishal shonkar