s^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C 1 No. 1139 of 2008 PETITIONER RESPONDENT 2. 3. Smt. Sheela Bothra, w/o Basant Kumar, aged about 39 years, R/o Basant Book Depot, Main Road, Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G) Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Urban Administration Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G). The Collector, Kabirdham, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G). The Municipal Council, Kabirdham, through the Chief Municipal Officer, Kabirdham (C.G). Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Appearance: Shri Rakesh Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, counsel for respondents no. 1 85 2 on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (22.02.2008) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is apprehending that her house may be demolished for widening the road. The said apprehension is based upon a news item published in Daily Naidunia Newspaper on 06.2.2008. Except the above news item, there is no basis for such apprehension raised by the petitioner. It is admitted position that till today neither the notices have been issues nor any authority of the State has come to the petitioner for demolishing -2- W.PfC)No.ll39of200fl ^M III—.• I ^' her house. Therefore, there does not appear to be any cause of action for prosecuting this petition as on today. In view of the above, this writ petition based on the news item cannot be entertained, at this stage. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file another petition as and when such cause of action arises in future. With the above observation, this petition stands disposed of, at this stage. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge /Rao/