IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3550 OF 1997 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3550 OF 1997 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3550 OF 1997 Rekha M. Thadani ..Plaintiff versus Satish P. Tripathi ..Defendant Mr. Vineet Jagtap i/b. Niranjan Jagtap & Co. for Plaintiff. None for Defendant. CORAM : DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. CORAM : DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. CORAM : DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE : 6TH MAY, 2009 DATE : 6TH MAY, 2009 DATE : 6TH MAY, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff states that the defendant has expired. The suit has accordingly abated. (DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)