MST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL APPLICATION NO.63 OF 2007 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.233 OF 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, Court’s or appearances, Court’s Judge’s order orders or directions & Registrar’s orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mr.A.A.Kocharekar for applicant. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 05th April 2007 PC : 1. While deciding the contempt petition, this Court directed the Trial Court to decide the suit in a time bound schedule. If the Trial Court has any difficulty in disposing of the suit within the time frame fixed by this Court, it is for the Trial Court to submit a report to this Court and seek extension of time. The application for extension of time made at the instance of the parties is misconceived and the same is rejected. (A.S.OKA, J.)