IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH & THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.SURI APPARAO WRIT PETITION No.2 of 2011 Between: Manoj Kumar Divvela ..... PETITIONER AND The Station House Officer, Thiruvuru Police Station Krishna District and 4 others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SURI APPARAO WRIT PETITION No.2 of 2011 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) This Writ of Habeas Corpus is filed by the petitioner alleging that over a month the petitioner and the alleged detenue M.Ramya fell in love and decided to marry each other and the same was conveyed to their respective parents, but their parents rejected their proposal. Therefore, against the will of their parents, the petitioner and the detenue got married on 29.11.2010 as per Hindu Customs and Rites in Sri Sri Sri Satyanarayana Swamyvari Temple, situated at Annavaram and photographs of their marriage were also taken. After the marriage, the marriage certificate could not be taken and they left for Visakhapatnam and for a few days they stayed there. It is stated that the petitioner joined in a private job working as Store Manager in LEE Store, situated at Siripuram of Visakhapatnam. On 24.12.2010 he found missing of the alleged detenue. He filed a complaint on 31.12.2010 but the same was not registered. The Station House Officer, Thiruvuru Police Station, Krishna District filed counter stating that on 01.12.2010 the father of the detenue filed a complaint alleging that his daughter was missing from 28.11.2011 i.e. the day before the alleged marriage. Thereafter, the complainant along with the daughter came to the police station on 25.12.2010 and reported that his daughter returned home and therefore, no further action is needed on his complaint. He examined the alleged detenue and recorded her statement. She stated that she is living with her parents. At the instance of the petitioner, he produced the alleged detenue girl before this Court stating that she may be resided as per her wish and will. We have examined the detenue. She expressed that she is willing to reside with her parents, and she is now residing with her parents at her volition without any coercion by anybody. If that be so, it cannot be said that the detenue was in illegal custody of her parents. It is for the petitioner to work out his remedies in appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum. We find no merits in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J ____________________ V.SURI APPARAO,J Dated: 24.01.2011 Dsr