^ <1^- BEFORE THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) ^^^^M-e-€N0. ....\b........... OF(2t)T( Applicant \\ Singte^ggiefi ^..^^r ^' RESPONDENTS Krishna Kumar Nagwanshi, son of Shri Ram Si=ngh Nagwanshi, Resident of ^,£)' Ring Road No. 2 Gondwara, Raipur y^ (C.G.)Smt. Mankunwan Sahu aged about 55 Years, W/o Madan Lal Sahu, Raipur (C.G.) Versus 1. State Transport Appellate Tribunal Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.) 2. Regional Transport Authority Chhattisgarh, Commissioner Officer, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Smt. Mankunwan Sahu aged about 55 Years, W/o Madan Lal Sahu, Raipur (C.G.) ^- Application for Review oforder dated 4/8/10 passed in W.P.tART 227) No. 3413 of 2009:- <S) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ]R£YIE\VPEJTr!QNNo,15M2011 APPLICANT : Krishna Kumar Nagwanshi. VERSUS RE8PONDENTS : State Transport Appellate Tribunal & Others. APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF ORDERDATED 4.8.10 PAS8ED 1N W.P.CART 227) N0. 3413 OF 2009 &rB:Hon9bleSlmSatishK^Agn^ Prescnt: Sliri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the applicant. Slm A-V.Shridhar, Paiiel Lawyer for the State. Shii Santosh Gupta, Advocate for the respondent No. 3. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 28th day of Febroary, 2011) LA. No. 1. This is an application for withdrawal of the review petition, on the grounds stated therein, with liberty to file a fresh review petition. Leamed counsel appearing for other side have no objection. The application is ordered as prayed for. Consequently, the review petition is dismissed as withdrawn with tlie aforestated liberty, ifso advised. On the request ofleamed counsel appearing for the applicant, Registry is directed to retum back the certified copy ofthe order dated 04.08.2010 (Annexure C/l) to the applicant after retainmg a photo-copy offhe same. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit