IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 17TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 26TH KARTHIKA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3514 of 2009() ------------------------------ CRA.35/2007 of ADDL. SESSIONS COURT (FAST TRACK-I), THRISSUR ST.808/2005 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, WADAKKANCHERY .................... REVN. PETITIONER: --------------------- KRISHNAN, S/O. ASARI SANKUM THATTAN VEETTIL HOUSE, NELLISSERY VILLAGE DESOM, THALAPPILLY TALUK. SRI.SANTHOSH P. PODUVAL SMT.R.RAJITHA RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. MOHANAN, S/O. VELAYUDHAN, THATTANVEETTIL HOUSE, NELLUVAL VILLAGE, DESOM,. 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JAYAKRISHNAN ADV. SRI.P.K.SAJEEV FOR R1 THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.S.GOPINATHAN, J. ---------------------------------------- Crl.R.P.No.3514 of 2009 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of November, 2009 ORDER The revision petitioner is assailing the judgment of conviction and sentence for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in S.T.No.808 of 2005 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Wadakkanchery as confirmed in Criminal Appeal No.35 of 2007 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track-I, Thrissur. 2. Now the revision petitioner along with the first respondent settled the matter out of court and filed Criminal M.Appl.No.11042 of 2009 seeking an order to record the compromise. 3. Having heard either side, I find no reason to reject the petition. Hence, the petition Criminal M.Appl.No.11042 of 2009 is recorded and the revision petitioner would stand acquitted under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and read with Section 320 (8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and is set at liberty. Revision petition is disposed as above. P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE skj