IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.18420 of 2009 Date of decision: 2nd December, 2009 Sat Pal … Petitioner Versus State Information Commission Punjab and another … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. H.C. Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Issue notice of motion. On the asking of Court, Mr.Anil Kumar Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the State. Two copies of the petition have been handed over to him. Petitioner has made two fold grievance in the present petition. (a) That in the opening line of the order passed by the State Information Commissioner, Punjab as appellate authority, petitioner has been called Surma Singh. (b) The appellate authority decided the case with an advisory note that the petitioner should seek only correct information on any subject in future. A blind man in Punjabi, out of goodwill and affection, is called Surma Singh. If it has offended the petitioner, same shall stand deleted from the order (Annexure P-4). Similarly, the last para of the order Civil Writ Petition No.18420 of 2009 (Annexure P-4), which is advisory in nature, shall not be read and shall stand deleted. With these observations, present petition is disposed of. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE December 2, 2009 rps 2