IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.54500 of 2007 ALAKH RANJAN KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.9658 of 2008 ALAKH RANJAN KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5/ 17.9.2008 Both the above two applications have been filed by one accused for grant of bail in connection with Gardanibagh P.S.Case No. 386 of 2005 which has been registered for offences under Sections 394,302 and 396 of the Indian Penal Code. In Cr.Misc.No. 54560 of 2007, affidavit has been sworn by Anil Kumar S/o Tapeshwar Pd.Singh, resident of Yarpur Rajputana, P.S. Gardanibagh, District Patna who claims to be the brother of the petitioner. The deponent was identified by R.N.Singh, Advocate Clerk to Mr.A.K.Sinha, Advocate. In Cr.Misc.No. 9658 of 2008 affidavit has been sworn by one Rajiv Kumar S/o Tapeshwar Prasad Singh, resident of Yarpur Rajputana, P.S. Gardanibagh, District Patna who also claims to be the brother of the petitioner. The deponent was identified by Ramdhin Kumar Singh, Advocate Clerk to Mr.Dinesh Singh, Advocate. Mr. Ashok Kumar is Advocate in Cr.Misc.No. 54500 of 2007 whereas Mr. Dinesh Singh is Advocate in Cr.Misc.No. 9658 of 2008. It appears that apparent forgery has been committed in concealing the fact that another bail application has also been filed. By order dated3.7.2008, a report regarding 2 stage of the case was called for which has been received. From the report it appears that the trial (Sessions Trial No. 555 of 2006) is at the verge of disposal because out of nineteen chargesheet witnesses, eighteen including informant, doctor and I.O. have been examined. A formal witness, Circle Officer who had conducted the test identification parade of the recovered articles, is to be examined. Considering the stage of the trial and taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, both the above applications are dismissed. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)