IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25987 of 2009 RAJEEV RANJAN Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 28.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Some deposit to Cooperative Society is said embezzled by not returning the same to depositors, while the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is simply a money collector, who after collecting the same, deposits to the Society. In a case to Consumer Forum, petitioner was exonerated from the liability but even then he is apprehending his arrest which in my view also is not justified. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 01(10) of 2006, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Madhepura subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)