Crl. Revision No. 3295 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Revision No. 3295 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:- 02.09.2011 Sunita Devi ....Petitioner Vs. Raj Singh and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present:- Mr. R.K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana. ***** A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) This revision petition has been preferred against the judgment dated 20.08.2010 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhajjar, acquitting the accused of the charges framed against them. As per proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C., even if the State has not preferred appeal against the judgment of acquittal, the victim could himself/herself file an appeal against the said judgment. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw this petition with liberty to file an appeal before the Court of Sessions. In view of the said fact, this petition is dismissed as Crl. Revision No. 3295 of 2010 (O&M) 2 withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Court of Sessions Judge, Jhajjar, within two months. In the event of his doing so, the delay shall stand condoned. (A.N.JINDAL) 02.09.2011 JUDGE ajp