1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.480 OF 2007 Ms.Chandrakala d/o Rohidas Renke, Petitioner. Vs State of Maharashtra and ors. Respondents Mr A.M.Saraogi, for the petitioner. Mr A.S.Gadkari, APP for respondent no.1 Mr R.D.Suryawanshi, for Mr R.M.Ghag present. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. DATED : 14th MARCH, 2007 DATED : 14th MARCH, 2007 DATED : 14th MARCH, 2007 P.C.: 1. Mr Saraogi, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the notice has been served on the petitioner. The learned A.P.P. disputes this. He has produced in this court the original notice which shows an acknowledgement of the petitioner. However, we do not want to go into the question whether the notice is received or not. We, however, direct the learned APP to give a copy of the notice to the petitioner. The petitioner may contest the notice if she desires. The petitioner to submit a reply within a period of one week from today. Let the petitioner remain present before the Special Executive Magistrate, Thane Division, Thane on 28.3.2007. We expect both sides not to publicise this matter and not 2 2 2 to give interview to the newspapers. No case is made out for interference at this stage. In view of this, Mr Saraogi, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the petition. The writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of. (D.B.Bhosale,J.) (Smt Ranjana Desai,J.)