IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36880 of 2010 MULAYAM SINGH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 09.02.2011 In the first paragraph of the order dated 05.01.2011, let the words “Both husband and wife shall remain physically present on that day” be deleted”. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. After executing Akrarnama, it is said that petitioner borrowed Rs. 80,000/- from complainant but receiving of any money and execution of Akrarnama is denied. Really if Akrarnama is not executed, no liability is made out but Akrarnama if is found signed by this petitioner, matter is serious. Signing or non-signing the deed can only be arrived at the end of the trial but at the stage fixing liability, refusal of anticipatory bail cannot be justified. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 322 of 2009 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Bikramganj, District-Rohtas subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)