IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10032 of 2011 Amit Kumar Chakraworti, Son of Late Sukhen Chakraworti, C/o Pushpa Rani Sarkar, Resident of Shripur Colony, P.O. - Songarhwa, P.S. - Fulwaria, District – Gopalganj. ........ Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Gopalganj. 4. The Incharge Medical Officer, Primary health Centre, Sadar Block, Gopalganj. 5. The Incharge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Yadopur, District – Gopalganj. 6. The Treasury Officer, Gopalganj. 7. The District Provident Fund Officer, Gopalganj. 8. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ....... Respondents 2 28.06.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that page 17 may not be looked into since it is not possible for the petitioner to get it typed. Heard Sri Purushottam Kumar Jha,learned counsel for the petitioner. The present writ petition has been filed with a prayer to direct the respondents to make payment of death-cum-retiral dues, family pension to the petitioner with effect from 29.05.1993 till he attained majority, amount of group insurance, provident fund and salary for the month of May, 1993 admissible to the petitioner's mother. It has been submitted that petitioner's mother who was an A.N.M. died in harness on 29.05.1993. At that time petitioner was aged about nine months. From the statement made in paragraph no. 7 of the writ petition it appears that at the time of death of mother of the petitioner his father was alive. The petitioner to the reasons best known to him has not disclosed in the petition regarding the date of death of his father subsequent to the death of his mother. In the present writ petition of-course a plea has been taken by the petitioner that after attaining majority the present petition has been filed, the court is of the opinion that in such a belated and stale matter writ jurisdiction of the court may not be invoked. The writ petition stands dismissed. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)