IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 22ND AUGUST 2011 / 31ST SRAVANA 1933 WA.No. 1941 of 2005 --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.24435/2004 Dated 17/08/2004 .................... APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS: -------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE FISHERIES PROJECT OFFICER, O/O. THE FISHERIES PROJECT OFFICER, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.BENNY GERVACIS. RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: ------------------------------ N.SINDHU, D/O.SATHYAN, PART TIME SWEEPER, OFFICE OF THE FISHERIES PROJECT OFFICER, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WA.No. 1941 of 2005 APPENDIX APPELLANTS' EXHIBITS : ANNEXURE A1 : TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(P) No.390/03/FIN. DATED 17.07.2003. ANNEXURE A2 : TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT LETTER NO.28555/T1/03/RD. DATED 05.10.2003. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : ANNEXURE R1 : TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(P) No.501/2005/FIN. DATED 25.11.2005. /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE J.Chelameswar, C.J. & P.R.Ramachandra Menon, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A. No. 1941 OF 2005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 22nd day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT Ramachandra Menon, J. The appeal has been preferred by the State challenging the verdict passed by the learned Single Judge granting the benefits to the writ petitioner with regard to the regularisation as a Part-time sweeper with consequential benefits. 2. It is, however, brought to the notice of this Court by the respondent, who is the writ petitioner, by filing a counter affidavit dated 15.08.2011 that, the Government has issued G.O.(P) No.501/2005/Fin. dated 25.11.2005, a copy of which has been produced and marked as Annexure R1, whereby the persons similarly situated like the respondent are made eligible to have the benefit to the extent as specified therein. In the said circumstance, we find that nothing further requires to be considered or adjudicated in this appeal. W.A. No. 1941 of 2005 -:2:- We dispose of the appeal in terms of G.O.(P) No.501/2005/Fin. dated 25.11.2005 (produced as Annexure R1). J.Chelameswar, Chief Justice. P.R.Ramachandra Menon, Judge. ttb