IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3202 of 2008 RAJENDRA THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 6.5.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. Counsel for the petitioner would fairly submit that in terms of the order passed on 24.4.2009 which is annexed as Annexure-A to the Show-Cause filed by the opposite parties, the order of this Court stands complied though belatedly. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that there has been reasons for the same which has been stated in the show-cause reply. This Court, in view of the fact that the earlier order of this Court has already been complied as would be evident from the perusal of Annexure-A, would leave the matter at rest though it was expected from the opposite parties that they would not only comply the order but also in time. The grievance of the petitioner at this stage that the consequence of the order dated 24.4.2009 by allowing him payment of certain amount as found admissible in the said order itself seems to be premature. An order has 2 already been passed on 24.4.2009 as contained in Annexure-A and it is, therefore, expected that the petitioner will be given its benefit in its true terms and spirit without coercing him to again move this Court. Counsel for the State also assures this Court that the remaining portion of the order of the Director passed on 24.4.2009 as contained in Annexure-A will be given effect to within a reasonable period. With the aforementioned observations, this application is disposed of. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)