HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5248 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner and the 1st respondent are immediate neighbours in Balasamudram Area of Hanamkonda, Warangal District. The 1st respondent obtained permission to construct a building with ground plus first floor on her site. Permission was accorded on 6.4.2009. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 1st respondent deviated from the sanctioned plan and though she made a representation, no action has been taken by the 2nd respondent. Learned Standing Counsel obtained instructions at the stage of admission. According to him, the deviation by the 1st respondent as to the front space is to the extent of 0.80 meters and on the Western side, i.e., towards the petitioner, it is 0.04 meters and a notice under Section 452 of Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act,1955 (for short ‘the Act’) was issued on 2.2.2010. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. The petitioner is under the impression that the second respondent did not move in the matter at all. On hearing the learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent, it emerges that there were minor deviations on the part of the 1st respondent while making constructions. Notice under Section 452 has already been issued. Much would depend on the nature of the explanation, which the 1st respondent may offer. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to take further steps in pursuance of the notice under Section 452 of the Act and pass appropriate orders after giving opportunity to the 1st respondent. No costs. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY,J DATE: 25th February, 2011 pnb