FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1247 OF 200 PETITION NO. 1247 OF 200 PETITION NO. 1247 OF 2006 Babasaheb Waman Salunkhe ... Petitioner versus State of Maharahstra and ors ... Respondents. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri P.R. Pal for the petitioner. Shri P.P.Kakade AGP for Respondents 1 to 5. Shri P.M. Havnur for Respondent no.6. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.R.KINGAONKAR, V.R.KINGAONKAR, V.R.KINGAONKAR, JJ. JJ. JJ. DTAED: DTAED: DTAED: 2ND MARCH,2006 2ND MARCH,2006 2ND MARCH,2006. 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction prohibiting the respondent State and other authorities from appointing respondent no.6 on any of the Corporation or Boards of the State. 2. The ground is that the respondent no.6 having been disqualified from contesting any election for next six years, should not be appointed on any of such Committee, Board or Corporation. Apart from the fact that this contention is untenable, the petition itself is pre-mature. If at all there is any cause of action, it will arise only after appointment is made and not before. Hence leaving that remedy available to the petitioner, the petition is dismissed. xxx