IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 394 OF 2007 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 272 OF 2007. Joseph Agostinho D'Souza & Ors.... ......... Applicants V/s The Addl.Collector & Competent Authority, Mumbai & Ors... Respondents. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Office Notes, Office ) Court's or Judge's Orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances ) Court's orders or directions and ) Registrar's orders. ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Mr.Rajesh S. Datar, Adv. for the applicants. Mr.Y.M.Nakhwa, AGP for R.Nos. 1 and 2. Mr.H.Shreepad Murthy i/by Piyush Shah, Adv. For R.Nos. 4 and 5. CORAM: A.P. DESHPANDE, J. 17.4.2007 PC: The matter is moved for speaking to minutes by the respondent contending that his submission is not completely referred in the order dated 10.4.2007. In the submission of the learned counsel for the respondents his case was that “after 1 obtaining commencement certificate in relation to construction on plot Nos.73 and 74, he applied for joint development.” The learned counsel urges this Court to include the said submission before the last sentence in para 1 of the order. Prayer is opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. What is being submitted is to record the complete and accurate submission made by the counsel for the respondents at the time of passing of the order. I do not find anything objectionable in the same. Hence include the above contention viz. “after obtaining commencement certificate in relation to construction on plot Nos.73 and 74, he applied for joint development” after the words “plot No.74.” in eighth line of the order and before the last sentence. Civil Application accordingly stands disposed of. 17.4.07. 2 3