1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.264 of 2007 in Letters Patent Appeal No.325/2006 in Writ Petition No. 2128 of 2005 (D) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha and A.B.Chaudhari, JJ. DATE : May 3, 2007. Heard Mr. M.P.Badar, Special Counsel for the Applicants. Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.264 of 2007 is moved by the Forest Department for review of the order dt. 25.1.2007. Counsel for the Review Petitioners has submitted that the Letters Patent Appeal was disposed of by this Court by the impugned order by observing that the status of the respondent no.1 during pendency of the Original Writ Petition shall be provisional and monetary benefits provided to the respondent no.1 by learned Single Judge at interlocatory stage are also provisional one, subject to the result of the Writ Petition. It is, therefore, contended that in the circumstances, the Forest Department will have to pay monetary benefits to the employees during pendency of the petition and it will be very difficult to recover the same even if the Forest Department succeed in the 2 petition. It is, therefore, prayed that liberty to move the learned Single Judge for expediting hearing of the Writ Petition may kindly be granted. In the backdrop of the above referred facts and considering the peculiar nature of dispute, we permit the learned Special Counsel Mr. Badar to move the learned Single Judge for expediting hearing of the Writ Petition. With these observations, the review petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE ssj