.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1004 OF 2005 Hetero Drugs Ltd & Anr. ...Petitioners. Versus Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr.Utkarsh Tewari i/b Shantilal & Co. for the Petitioners. Mr.N.D.Sharma, Advocate for Respondent No.1. .... CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : JUNE 26, 2006. JUNE 26, 2006. JUNE 26, 2006. P.C.: . On behalf of the petitioners, the learned Counsel makes a statement that competent office i.e. Respondent No.3 has rejected the application of Respondent No.5. Once that be the case, the present Petition would be infructuous. The issue of constitutional validity can be gone into in appropriate proceedings. With the above directions, Petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. [F.I.REBELLO,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]