IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No.99 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: 07.04.2010. Manjit Singh. ...... PETITIONER Versus M/s Design Engineers and Contractors. ...... RESPONDENT CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Gurmit Singh, Advocate for Mr. L.M.Gulati, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pardeep Rajput, Advocate for the respondent. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed against order dated 08.01.2010 passed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Amritsar in complaint case No.3734 dated 04.01.2008, vide which defence evidence of the present petitioner was closed. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. CRR No.99 of 2010 It has been stated by learned counsel for the revision-petitioner that only one opportunity be granted to the petitioner to conclude his evidence. Though petitioner – accused could not adduce his evidence despite last opportunity however, in the interest of justice, learned trial Court is directed to give one effective opportunity to the petitioner – accused to conclude his defence evidence at his own responsibility subject to payment of Rs.1,000/- as cost. Disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) April 7, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2