HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Coram:- Hon'ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra & Hon'bleShn RM. Chandrakar. ^ Contempt petition No.207/2008 " Petitioner : Dr. Shiv Narayan Mishra, ^/o Shri Pandit Jh^m Prasad h^hra. f aged about 48 years, Tjajji'ied SM , Graduate T^acher, D.A^/. Pyblic f¥u School, Kirandut, "DistriCSC Dantewada, South Bastar (CG) Versus Respondents Contemnors \^^' INNIN^S^- 1. Gyan Prakash Chopra, Sto htot Known, aged about 87 ye|trs^3 ? President D.A.V. Coll^ge ,' Managing Committee, y Chitragupt Maig, N6w Delhi. y 5= 2. Shri O.P. Arora, S/o Late Shri * Anup Lal Arora, aged.ab^.it?^;!; years, Regional Directoc, D.A.V. ^ Public School, MP. Zone, 6hi|ai^' " District Durg (CG) : 3. Ashok Kumar, S/o V. Bharthan, aged about 56 yeara, Princtpal,^ ] D.A.V. Public School. Basant ». Vihar, S.E.C.L. Bilaspur (CG) 4. R.L.P. Gupta. S/o Not Kn<^h,: aged about 50 yeara, General y Manager, S.E.C.L. Headquarter ^ BMaspur as the Chainman of - ^ Local Managing Commitee,? D.A.V. Public School, Bastlrtt' 2 Vihar, S.E.C.L. BJIaspur Contemot petition under Article 215 of the Coiislafaition read with Section 10 & 12 of the contemot ofCourt Act 04/03/2010 Shri A.K.Shukla, counsel for the petitioner. :.^ . .'. - •••••.•;' •,:•:•". Shri Ashish Shrivastava, counsel for respondente No.1 to 3. Shri N. Naha Roy, counsel for respondent No.4. ? Heard. (2) The petitioner has filed this instard contempt petftlon w^i an allegatlon that fte respondents have willftilly violated the order dated 21/06/2007 passed in WA. No110/2007, whereby the respondents were directed to issue formal order of confirmation ofttie ^titioner ^ ^ along with tncremertte fr@m the date he has p®s»sdB.Ed-examinatioia i.e. 21.01.2007. (3) From the documents availabte on rocoRi fled as AnnexureO-t along with I.A. No.3 dated 09.04.2009, ft is evident ttiat the petitioner has been confirmed with effect from 21.01.1997 asperappolntenent g;:.^... .-'w^. tetter dated 21.01.1997. Itwas also contended by leaniedcounsel for. ;^^' the respondents that the petitioner is being paid inc»Bmen(sfi»m|lha date ofconfirmation. ::--s%-..::.. (4) The aforesaid fact has not been dispu^d by teamtd couRseli' forthepetttioner. (^ In these circumstances, the notice tesued to the petttioner for contempt stands discharged and the contempt proeeecBngs ^gainst the respondentsare dropped. __^__^_ Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge