Crl.Misc.No.M-13223 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.Misc.No.M-13223 of 2008 Date of decision: 14.10.2009 Jangir Singh ... Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others ... Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH. Present: Mr.A.S.Sullar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.P.S.Grewal, AAG, Punjab. Mr.V.D.Goyal, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ... JORA SINGH, J. By this common order, I propose to dispose of Crl.Misc.No.M- 13223 of 2008 (Jangir Singh versus State of Punjab and others) and Crl.Misc.No.M-13224 of 2008 (Sukhwinder Singh versus State of Punjab and another), as both these petitions have been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.230 dated 6.7.2002 under Sections 326/324/323/34 IPC registered at Police Station Samana, and DDR No.23 in FIR No.230 dated 6.7.2002, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-3). Notice of motion was issued. Jagtar Singh son of Jangir Singh filed his affidavit to the effect that there is a compromise amongst the parties and in view of the compromise, FIR and DDR may be quashed. Vide order dated 28.7.2009, parties were directed to appear before the trial Court and the trial Court was further directed to record their statements and submit its report as to whether compromise is made Crl.Misc.No.M-13223 of 2008 2 voluntarily or not. Report was received from the concerned Court to the effect that statements of the parties were recorded and the compromise amongst the parties is made voluntarily and without any pressure. As per allegations in the FIR, Sukhwinder Singh, Harmit Singh, Sarabdyal Singh and Mahinder Singh caused injuries to complainant Jangir Singh. This is a case of version and cross version. Family dispute. With the intervention of respectables/friends, parties have effected compromise. As per compromise, complainant party is not going to support the prosecution story. No purpose would be served to direct the petitioners in both the petitions to face trial because ultimately the petitioners are to be acquitted of the charges levelled against them when the complainant party is not going to support the prosecution story. Parties are to reside peacefully after compromise, otherwise there are chances of further litigation. In view of the compromise, FIR No.230 dated 6.7.2002 under Sections 326/324/323/34 IPC registered at Police Station Samana, and DDR No.23 in FIR No.230 dated 6.7.2002, with all subsequent proceedings arising there from, are ordered to be quashed. Both the petitions are allowed. 14.10.2009 ( JORA SINGH ) pk JUDGE