IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8470 of 2010 JUBEDA KHATOON, W/O LATE JASIM KHAN, R/O MOHALLA- CHANDWARA, DARJI TOLA, P.S. TOWN, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KOSHI DIVISION, SAHARSA. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SUPAUL, DISTT.- SUPAUL. 5. THE PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, SUPAUL, DISTT.- SUPAUL. 6. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 14.5.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of her grievances as highlighted in the writ application, the petitioner although represented her grievances earlier, however, proposes to file a fresh representation before the Superintendent of Police, Supaul (respondent no.4). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in her representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. However, upon consideration, if any of the claims or any part of the claims is 2 found not admissible, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.) PNM