IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2970 of 2008 Date of Decision: February 10, 2010 Hardeep Singh ….Petitioner Versus Mehar Kaur and another. …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present: Mr. H.N.S. Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Gurminder Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. S.D. Anand, J. The impugned order negatived plaintiff- petitioner’s plea for the framing of an additional issue. The matter was, at the time of presentation of the plea, fixed for arguments on merits thereof. It was noticed by the learned Trial Court that the defendant-respondents had indeed taken up an objection with regard to the maintainability of the suit. Though no issue on that point came to be framed, the learned counsel for the party opposite conceded that C.R. No. 2970 of 2008 the legal objection qua the maintainability of the suit could be taken up at the time of consideration of relief. In view of that consensual position, noticed in the impugned order itself, the petition is held to be devoid of force and is ordered to be dismissed. February 10, 2010 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2