HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4375 & 4569 of 2011 Date : 05.11.2011 Between : Neni Hitech Club Pvt. Ltd., Secunderabad, rep. by its Managing Director & another. …..Petitioners And Raj Kishenji Pershad & others. …..Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4375 & 4569 of 2011 COMMON ORDER : After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, these two revision petitions are disposed of by this common order. For the purpose of disposal, I refer to the facts as arise in C.R.P.No.4375 of 2011. The petitioners herein are defendants 1 and 4 in O.S.No.41 of 2009 pending on the file of the learned I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad. The said suit is filed by the respondent/plaintiffs for eviction of petitioners herein and two others from the suit schedule property and also for recovery of arrears of rent. In the said suit, the respondent/plaintiffs have filed I.A.No.3375 of 2010 under Order XV-A read with Section 151 CPC, seeking to direct the petitioners herein for payment of arrears of rent, failing which, to strike off their defence. The said I.A. was disposed of on 03.02.2011, directing the petitioner/defendants to deposit an amount of Rs.22,81,850/- towards arrears of rent on or before 14.02.2011. Further directions were also issued to deposit future rents on or before 12th of every month till the adjudication of the suit. On the application of petitioners, the time granted in the above said order for deposit of arrears of rent was also extended earlier. When the arrears of rent are not deposited as per the directions issued in I.A.No.3375 of 2010, docket order, dated 28th September 2011 was passed in the aforesaid suit to strike off the defence of petitioners herein while posting the matter for evidence of respondent/plaintiffs. Questioning such order, C.R.P.No.4569 of 2011 is filed. The petitioners herein have filed I.A.No.2778 of 2011, seeking enlargement of time granted in the order in I.A.No.3375 of 2010. The said application filed for enlargement of time, is rejected by an order dated 03.02.2011, which is questioned in C.R.P.No.4375 of 2011. In these revision petitions, it is submitted by Sri S.R.Ashok, learned Senior counsel appearing for petitioners in C.R.P.No.4375 of 2011, that as there is a dispute with regard to the quantum of rent arrived at in I.A.No.3375 of 2010, they already approached this Court by filing C.R.P.No.1509 of 2011 and the same is pending consideration. It is submitted that an amount of Rs.14,00,000/- is already deposited and if reasonable time is granted, his clients are prepared to deposit the balance amount. On the other hand, it is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for respondent/plaintiffs that though the order was passed as early as on 03.02.2011 directing the petitioners to deposit the arrears of rent, the amount is not being deposited, and without paying the arrears of rent, the defendants are continuing in possession illegally. I have perused the order passed in I.A.No.3375 of 2010. In the aforesaid order, the learned I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, has directed for deposit of an amount of Rs.22,81,850/-. Further directions were issued for deposit of future rents on or before 12th of every month till the judgment is rendered in the suit. As much as it is not in dispute that an amount of Rs.14,00,000/- is deposited in compliance to the directions issued in I.A.No.3375 of 2010, and the grant of some reasonable time is also not seriously disputed by the learned counsel appearing for respondent/plaintiffs, I deem it is a fit case to grant some more time for deposit of balance amount by the petitioners in compliance of the directions issued in the order dated 03.02.2011, passed in I.A.No.3375 of 2010. For the aforesaid reasons, civil revision petition No.4375 of 2011 is disposed of, enlarging the time granted in the order, dated 03.02.2011, by four weeks from today, to pay the balance amount in terms of the order passed in I.A.No.3375 of 2010. It is made clear that in addition to payment of said amount, the petitioners shall continue to deposit the monthly rents on or before 12th of each calendar month as ordered by the trial Court. On deposit of such amount, the respondent/plaintiffs are entitled to withdraw the same without furnishing any security. In view of the orders passed in C.R.P.No.4375 of 2011, the order, dated 28th September 2011, passed in O.S.No.41 of 2009 is also set aside. It is made clear that if the amounts are not deposited within the time referred above, it is open for the respondent/plaintiffs to approach this Court for passing appropriate orders. Both the revision petitions are accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 5th November 2011 N.B: Issue C.C. in two days. (b/o) Kvsn/ajr