Arbpl898.09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO. 898 OF 2009 Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited ...Petitioner. Vs. New World Enterprises ...Respondents. Mr. Mangesh Patel for the Petitioner. Mr. S.B. Deshmukh for the Respondents. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 20th JANUARY, 2010. P.C.- 1 The Respondents filed an affidavit and submitted that the property mentioned in prayer clause (a) and (b) (Exhibit “G”), is not owned by them and it is someone’s else. In view of this, there is no question of any attachment under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Arbitration Act), in dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondents. However, considering the averments made and in view of the fact that there is no denial to the liability, at this stage, I am inclined to allow this Petition in terms of prayer clause (c), only. 2 The Respondents to provide the details within four weeks. The liberty is granted to the Petitioner to take out the Petition/ Application thereafter. 3 The Petition is accordingly, disposed of in terms of prayer clause (c) only, with liberty. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)