IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12460 of 2010 1. KUMARI MEENA BHARTI W/O SRI RAMDEO PRASAD YADAV R/O VILL.- TENGARAHA, P.S. KISHUNPUR, DISTT.- SUPAUL Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., PATNA 2. THE COLLECTOR, SUPAUL 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SUPAUL 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BLOCK SARAIGARH, DISTT.- SUPAUL 5. THE MUKHIYA, LALGANJ-BAGEBA-TENGARAHA GRAM PANCHAYAT, P.S. KISHUNPUR, DISTT.- SUPAUL 6. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, LALGANJ-BAGEBA- TENGARAHA GRAM PANCHAYAT, P.S. KISHUNPUR, DISTT.- SUPAUL 7. KUMARI SHARDA RANI W/O SRI BAIDYA NATH SAHU R/O VILL.- LALGANJ, P.S. KISHANPUR, DISTT.- SUPAUL 8. POONAM KUMARI W/O SRI BAL GOVIND MEHTA R/O VILL.- BAGEBA, P.S. KISHUNPUR, DISTT.- SUPAUL 9. GITA KUMARI W/O SRI RAJIV KUMAR R/O VILL.- BAGEBA, P.S. KISHUNPUR, DISTT.- SUPAUL ----------- 02. 30.03.2011 The issue raised by the petitioner is academic now. Her grievance is that even though she had higher marks than some private respondents, she was not appointed as a Panchayat Shiksha Mitra in the year 2005. Since the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra has been abolished after 1.7.2006 on coming of the new rule, the issue being agitated now remains academic as no person can be appointed on a post which does not exist. Writ is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)