IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11079/2008 Decided on:20.12.2010 _____________________________________________ H.P. Rajkiya Prathmik Anubandh Shikshak Sangh Block Kuther. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. R.S. Gautam, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Mr. R.S. Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous as far as other reliefs are concerned, except the salary of the monsoon break. This issue is no more res integra in view of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in Baldev Singh and others versus State of Himachal 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 Pradesh and others, CWP No. 415 of 2000, decided on 1st September, 2008. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release and pay the salary of the monsoon break to the members of the petitioner’s association, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. However, there shall be no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 20.12.2010 *awasthi*