IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39256 of 2008 1. DHODHO SOREN, SON OF LATE DEWAN SOREN 2. PARGANNA SOREN, SON OF LATE KURHIA SOREN 3. MANBOL SOREN 2 MANBEL SOREN,S/O JIWAN SOREN 4. DANBEL SOREN ALIAS DANIEL SOREN, SON OF SRI JIWAN SOREN. 5. DEBLAL SOREN, SON OF SRI DHODHO SOREN 6. HARILAL SOREN, SON OF SRI DHODHO SOREN ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE- MURGPAKRA, P.S. KATORIA 9O.P.JAIPUR0,DISTRICT-BANKA ……….PETITIONERS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR……OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2. 04.12.08. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of this case Petitioner No. 1 Dhodho Soren has been arrested hence this application for anticipatory bail has become infructuous against him and is accordingly dismissed as against him. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Katoriya (Jaipur) P.S. Case No. 55 of 2008 for the offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that ,although, their names in the F.I.R., however no specific allegations have been made against them and their names has been given in the F.I.R. merely on suspicion. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that during investigation also no material has come to implicate these petitioners. A supplementary affidavit has been filed stating therein that the deceased was died on account of fall on hard substance in drunken stage. 2 Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submits that in view of specific allegation of committing murder against these petitioners, they are not entitled to privilege of bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners and the same is accordingly rejected. On surrender, application for bail is filed and the same would be considered on its own merit according to law without being prejudiced by the present order. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)