IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19447 of 2011 Yaddu Yadav & Anr. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 30.06.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion of petition. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the parents of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the D. P. Act. Later on Section 201 of the I.P.C. was also added. The accusation is of demand of dowry and torture. It is alleged that dead body was disposed off without informing the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the victim died due to post delivery complication and information was given to informant’s side which has been admitted by wife and daughter of the informant during investigation. The 2 statement has been made in paragraph no.10 of the petition that the petition has also been filed by the informant before the learned court below that the victim died due to post delivery complication. It is submitted that the husband is in jail. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners, Yaddu Yadav and Phabiya Devi, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Singheshwar P.S. Case No. 91 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Madhepura, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)