IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.8191 of 2010 CHANDAN KUMAR, S/O SHREE MUNNA PD. SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR **** /2/ 10.03.2010 Heard both the sides. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 395, 397 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 26.09.2009 for having been in possession of the looted mobile without it’s sim, but, he has no criminal antecedents, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Session's Trial No. 923 of 2009 arising out of Kasba P.S. Case No. 79 of 2009 to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, II, Purnea, on the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the 2 petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the Court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)