IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3277 of 2009 SURESH PRASAD SINGH . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. . ----------- 2. 18.11.2009. Heard counsel for the petitioner. No one appears for the respondents. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that from the tenor of the order dated 31.3.2009 passed in CWJC No. 12118 of 2001 regarding the case of the petitioner it would be clear that the dispute was with respect to plot no. 757 but somehow in the last but one line of second paragraph at page 4 and also at three places at page 5 Plot No. 760 has been recorded which ought to have been Plot No. 757. In the opinion of this court, counsel for the petitioner seems to be correct and therefore Plot No. 757 in place of 760 will be read at page 4 in the last but one line of paragraph no. 2 as also at all the three places at page 5. Order dated 31.3.2009 passed in CWJC No. 12118 of 2001 stands modified to the above extent. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) 2