Crl. Misc No. M 5090 OF 2011 ****** Lal Chand vs State of Punjab Present : Mr. K.S.Dhillon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Dhaliwal, Addl. A.G.Punjab ******* On 1.4.2011, the following order was passed :- “ This is a petition for anticipatory bail. The allegations are that the petitioner and his uncle forcibly tried to evict the complainant from her tenanted premises. Thereafter, the uncle of the petitioner, who is the owner of the house, fled to England. On the last date of hearing, I put it to counsel for the petitioner as to whether the petitioner's uncle is ready to come back to India to join investigation. Counsel for the petitioner has categorically stated that the uncle of the petitioner will be coming back to India in the last week of June of this year. In the circumstances, I deem it appropriate to grant conditional anticipatory bail to the petitioner, which shall be reviewed on the next date of hearing, after verifying whether the uncle of the petitioner has come back to India or not. Adjourned to 6.7.2011. Meanwhile, arrest of the petitioner shall remain stayed.” Thereafter on 6.7.2011, the case was adjourned to today. Today, counsel for the petitioner has very fairly stated that the petitioner is not responding to any query made by him. In the circumstances, I have no option but to dismiss this petition. So ordered. ( AJAY TEWARI ) July 11, 2011. JUDGE `kk'