Cri. Apln. No. 2565/11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2565 OF 2011 Sayyed Shahed Sayyed Khurshid, ....Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent. Mr. Shailesh Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for applicant. Mr. G.R. Ingole, APP for State/respondent. CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 13th July, 2011. PER COURT : 1. This application is filed for anticipatory bail in Cr. No. 18/2011 registered in Shelu Police Station for offences punishable under sections 420, 468, 34 etc. of IPC. The papers of investigation were made available. Both the sides are heard. 2. The crime is registered on the basis of report given by one Jagannath Kadam. He has made allegations that present applicant had come to him on 7.1.2009 and he had given his name as Dyaneshwar Ganpat Ingale resident of village Babhulgaon, Tahsil and District Latur Cri. Apln. No. 2565/11 2 and he had represented that he and others were ready to purchase the tractor and they would pay the remaining installments of ICICI Bank from where the loan was taken for purchasing the tractor. Agreement was accordingly made and the tractor was handed over to the applicant. Subsequently the installments of ICICI bank were not paid and when complainant made more inquiry, he realized that false name was given by the present applicant. The applicant could not return the custody of the tractor also, but he gave in writing that he had committed mistake in giving false name. The papers of investigation show that this undertaking was notarized before notary and the applicant had admitted that he has made false representation for taking the custody of the tractor and installments of ICICI bank were also not paid. This material is sufficient to make out prima facie case for offences punishable under sections 420, 468, 34 etc. of IPC. Though section 419 is not there, it can be added as there is cheating by personation. In such cases, custodial interrogation is must and so this Court holds that this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail and so, the application stands rejected. 3. Authenticated copy of this order be given to APP to act upon. [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] Cri. Apln. No. 2565/11 3 ssc/criapln2565.11