1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR . CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.383 OF 2010. NIVRUTTI WAMAN KHARCHE VS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri Abhay Sambre, Advocate for the applicant. Shri V. A. Thakre, APP for State respondent. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 17th MARCH, 2010. 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail in relation to Crime No.20 of 2010 of Police Station Nandura. 2. The applicant claims that he is not involved in the commission of offence, the imputations are based on false story, and there is no evidence whatsoever. He prays for grant of anticipatory bail. 3. The prosecution is ready with the papers. The affidavit opposing the bail of the applicant is filed. The prayer for anticipatory bail is strongly opposed. The thrust of the prosecution is on the suicide note. 4. Perused the suicide note. It contains torture, mental agony at the hands of the present applicant and 2 trouble and torture by the members of Village Education Samiti. It also contains imputations against one of the lady teacher. It contains a statement that often obscene events took place in the School. He further states that he was humiliated due to service of notice on him by the Head Master. He, therefore, being fed up with all these things wants to commit suicide. 5. This Court has examined various aspects from the suicide note and statement of witnesses. What prima facie appears is that so far no material has come forward on the basis of which the act of the accused of “abetting” suicide could emerge. 6. In this situation, the applicant has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail. 7. In view of this, interim order granted by this Court on 4 th March 2010 is made absolute. 8. Application is disposed of. Judge //mule//