c ^^aoi 5LE 3 IN THJ; HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR WRIT^ETITION NO.57 2)^ /2005 PETITIONER t\^'y <^y.- ^...^?> ^^' ^^ ^•\^~^" ^'v^ RESPONDENTS /- Chhabilal Patel, aged about 48 years, son of Late Shri Anjore Singh Patel, occupation ~ Service, Sub Divisional Officer, Water Resources Departraent, Sub Division - Abhanpur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS , 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through : Its Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^2. The Avar Sachiv, Department of Water Resources, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) /3. The Engineer-in-Chief, Department of Water Resources, Sihava Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) /4. The Executive Engineer, Water Management Division No. 1 Raipur, (C.G.) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, ^'(^^^' ^ . ^ ^^ The Petitioner respectfully submits as under:- XI-HC-22 ^^ '^[RRT^. ^TFr?. t^TRiy 18 3^1'^T 1c??ri^"3Tf^T ^^i^'^f^ <" ^ &r ^'^idHLfc.J / y^ ^/ '^ ^ '^' ^.,.t^:S^.k^ \ •BTi^I ^^T^R 'H^f Having consider^d and withouj case, mthe opmion ofthis Court, end^ •^N^Fft^-rn^^ fezf TJ^R i73^R-3^l 9-12-2005 • Shri A.N. Bhakta, counsel for t|ie petitioner. 31m Vivek Sharma, Panel La^|er for the State, on ach^ance copy. Heard. Counscl for the petitioner subijiits that the petitioiier has been transferred as per .^xmexure P-1 clated 9-11-2005 dtirmg the ban periocl He submits that for the present'he may be given an oppoijtumty to maks a representation before the respondents. expressing any opinion on the merits of the ofJTOtice witt be served ifa direction is given to the petitioner to make a detailed rtpresentation raising his grievances before the competent authority ofrespondents altag with a copy ofthe petition and this order withm 15 days from today and on s^ich-representation beiiig.filed, the.competent authority of respondents shall clecide the sa.me on its own merits m accordance. with law as eariy as possible preferabty wii^ntwo months from the date ofreceipt ofthe representation. It is made clear that if^ny giievance remams, the petitioner may avail the remedv available under the law. Coumel further subimts that tl^e petitioner has not been relieve4 and he may be allowe.d to contmue tfll the decision i>fthe representation. It is directed that if the petition^r has not been relievecl he may be allowed to continue tiil the representation ts decidep. ' With fhe aforesaid obser^-ations Certtfied copy as per mles. this petition stands disposed of Consequently M.W.P.No. 57^6/2005 and I.A. No. 9701/2005 aLso stand disposed of. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ['CTI^ <1<^^