IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 17TH JANUARY 2008 / 27TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 804 of 2008(U) ----------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. J.VISWANATHAN, KALLUMOOTTIL HOUSE, KOTHAPURAM, KARALI JUNCTION P.O., KOLLAM. 2. SMT. K.BHAVANI, GOPALAMANDIRAM, KUNNATHOOR P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. I.V. PRAMOD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/01/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ========================= W.P.(C)NO. 804 OF 2008 ========================= Dated this the 17th day of January 2008 JUDGMENT The prayer that is sought for is against Ext.P1. Petitioner submits that he had applied for transfer of permit and that by Ext.P1 proceedings of the RTA, the same has been adjourned in view of the pendency of SLP No.9466/2007 filed by the KSRTC before the Supreme Court. It is contended by the learned counsel that SLP is in relation to the issue of fresh permits and what is sought for by the petitioner in his application is only transfer of his permit. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, the SLP referred to in Ext.P1 is irrelevant to the issue raised in the application, there was no necessity to adjourn the application. Therefore I dispose of this writ petition directing that the relevancy or otherwise of the SLP, insofar as the petitioner's application referred to above, shall be considered by the respondents and orders be passed on an application filed by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE css/