1 ABA 1054-11.odt Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1054 OF 2011 1. Sunil Pandurang Bhogal .Applicants 2. Abasaheb Tukaram Bhogal 3. Popat Chandrabhan Bhogal 4. Babu Chandrabhan Bhogal V/s. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr.Abhijeet A. Joshi, Advocate, for the Applicants Smt.S.V.Sonawane, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 23RD DECEMBER, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is an application for anticipatory bail by four persons, who apprehend arrest in connection with C.R.No.397 of 2011 for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 326, 323, 504, 506, 147, 148 & 149 of the Indian Penal 2 ABA 1054-11.odt Code registered with Karmala Police Station, District Solapur. 3. An offence was registered pursuant to investigation ordered on a private cri.complaint 273 of 2011 registered with Judicial Magistrate F. C., Karmala, District Solapur. In this complaint by Deepak Vinayak Shinde in respect of an incident dated 4th January, 2011 he has named four applicants along with others, who had already been named in the FIR by the first informant at Karmala Police Station which was registered as NCR No. 2355 of 2011. The learned APP states that the investigating officer is not present. However, considering the fact that the present applicants were not at all named in the report given by the first informant to the police immediately after the incident, applicants' custodial interrogation for the purpose of further investigation may not be necessary though one of the injuries sustained 3 ABA 1054-11.odt by the victim is possibly uprooting of an incisor tooth. Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. Applicants be released on bail on their furnishing P.R.Bond of Rs.25,000/- each with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.25,000/- on the following conditions. (i) The applicants shall report at the Karmala Police Station, District Solapur on 29th December, 2011 at 11.00 a.m. and thereafter, as and when required by the investigating officer. (ii) The applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required. (iii) The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. (iv) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. . The order will remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge sheeted the applicant may furnish fresh 4 ABA 1054-11.odt bonds before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in AIR 2011 (SC) 312(Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State of Maharashtra And Ors.). 4. Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)