1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No.456 of 2009 In Writ Petition No.2551 of 2009 (D) (Sau. Kamal w/o Maroti Kaypalwar v. The Additional Collector, Yavatmal) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri F.T. Mirza, Advocate for Appellant. Shri D.B. Yengal, AGP for R- 1. Shri N.N. Motghare, Advocate for R- 2. Coram : A.H. Joshi & A.R. Joshi, JJ. Dated : 3 rd November, 2009 1. Writ Petition No.2551 of 2009 was dismissed by order dated 27-8-2009, which order is under challenge in this appeal. 2. Heard Shri F.T. Mirza, learned Advocate for the appellant; Shri D.B. Yengal, learned AGP for respondent No.1; and Shri N.N. Motghare, learned Advocate for respondent No.2. 3. It is seen that the factual aspects recorded in para 6 of the order, which relate to the actual days of non-availability of the Secretary, are not shown to be incorrect. All that is said is that the Secretary was actually not available at the Gram 2 Panchayat. 4. The complaints relating to absence of Secretary relied upon by the appellant were furnished of late and have been dealt with by the learned Single Judge in para 7 and the reasons are recorded in paras 9 and 10 of the order. 5. The fact-finding confirmed by the learned Single Judge to the effect that non-availability of Secretary on certain dates was not good and sufficient cause, is seem to be well-supported and is not shown to be erroneous or perverse. 6. In these premises, there is no ground to entertain the appeal and it is, therefore, dismissed. Judge Judge. pdl