IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25742 of 2009 BIRBAL YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 30.10.2009 In the order dated Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant. Petitioner is an accused in Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 58of 2009 for the offence under section 364,201 and 120B and later on section 302 of the Indian Penal Code has been added. One Bimlesh Kumar Yadav has become traceless since 10.2.2009 for which the informant has lodged the case on 12.2.2009 when he failed to get any information. Later one his dead body was recovered from the well. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that during the course of investigation the maximum against the petitioner is that father of one of the prime accused probably had knowledge about the crime and he kept quite in the matter but he has not participated in the actual crime. The petitioner is in custody for quite sometime only on suspicion. Taking the materials on record in mind, let the petitioner, namely, Birbal Yadav be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 58 of 2009. One of the sureties will be executed by the wife of the petitioner, namely, Sonali Devi on due identification by the - 2 - court below. Petitioner will cooperate in the trial and not intimidate the witnesses. He will appear on each and every date fixed in the case during trial. If he breaches any of the conditions he will face the risk of loosing the privilege of bail granted to him. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)