IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2051 of 2011 RAJ NARAYAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR -------- 2 04.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Originally, informant filed complaint case bearing Complaint case no.243C/2009 which was converted into Parwatta P.S. Case no. 60 of 2009 registered under sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. Allegedly, petitioner took some cash from the informant to sell his vehicle but subsequently, neither he returned cash amount nor sold the vehicle to the informant Even if the prosecution story assumed to be true, then also, it appears to me that it is a case of only violation of contractual obligation. Moreover, in course of hearing, learned counsel for the informant points out that prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner had already been rejected by this court and at the time of hearing of above stated anticipatory bail application, the petitioner had expressed his willingness to deposit the amount in question before the court below but he did not deposit the same and now the trial of the petitioner is about to at the verge of conclusion. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Raj Narayan Singh be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the - 2 - Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in Parwatta P.S. Case no. 60 of 2009. Shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)