IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41468 of 2010 ANIL KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05. 15.03.2011. Heard Sri Ashwani Kumar Singh, learned senior counsel for the petitioner who is not named in the FIR which is under Section 386 of the IPC. There could not be any doubt that some attempts were made to extort money from a practicing physician but the FIR itself indicates that it was accused Jhulan Pandey who was making calls to the informant, the doctor, for realizing the demanded sum of Rs.75,000/- and when he was apprehended his identity was also established by confronting him with the P.C.O.-owner. During interrogation by the police, the said Jhulan Pandey named the present petitioner as the chief planner of the extortion attempt. The contention is that the petitioner does not know the said Jhulan Pandey and in fact there might be any reason either for the police or for the said Jhulan Pandey to falsely implicate the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released from 2 custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Kotwali P.s.Case No.293 of 2010. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)