1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4219 OF 2011 _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _______________________|_______________________________________ CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J. Date : 16.06.2011. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner is a complainant who had filed complaint against present Respondent No.6, alleging misdeeds. The license of the fair price shop and kerosene distribution was cancelled. Aggrieved thereby, the Respondent NO.6 has filed the Revision before Respondent No.2. During pendency of the same, the Respondent No.2 has stayed the order passed by the Respondent No.4. The petitioner has assailed the said order granting stay in the present Writ Petition. 2 3. Mr.Jadhavar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in fact, the Revision is not maintainable before Respondent No.2. There is a provision of appeal and when the said proceeding itself was not maintainable, no interim orders could have been passed. The learned counsel submits that there are serious allegations against the Respondent No.6 which has been considered by the Respondent No.4 and has passed the order cancelling the license. The Respondent NO.2 could not have granted interim stay in such a casual manner. 4. It is submitted at Bar that the Revision is fixed for hearing on 5.7.2011. It is not disputed that the Respondent NO.6 is holding the license of fair price shop and kerosene. The proceedings are pending before Respondent No.2. Whether the said proceedings are maintainable or not would be decided by the authorities after hearing the parties. Moreover, an interlocutory order has been passed protecting the Respondent No.6 and the appeal itself is to be heard on merits. In light of that I do not feel it appropriate to interfere in 3 the supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Taking into account the nature of dispute, the Respondent No.2 shall decide the proceedings filed by the Respondent No.6 expeditiously and in any case within a period of two (2) months from today. 5. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) Dt.16.06.2011. asp/office/wp4219.11 4