IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7596 of 2011 SURESH PRASAD GUPTA @ AMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 28.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report but it is stated that stolen mobile, camera and one VIP attaichi were recovered from possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner drew my attention towards the contents of the first information report and submitted that as per prosecution case itself, red coloured mobile and mehroon coloured attaichi had been stolen whereas black coloured mobile and blue coloured VIP attaichi have been recovered from possession of the petitioner and so far as recovery of camera is concerned, it is not the case of the prosecution that any camera was stolen in the alleged occurrence. Although, petitioner carries some criminal antecedent but taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 246 of 2010. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)