IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH ATBILASFUR W.P.ISl N0.^^ /2010 PETITIONERS L<;^^S)S^" ^lg^s-. ^sh s^ '"s.v^-1"'s>"" fr- 1.' Jagdish Prasad Gypta,S/o Late Shri Chamaru Sao,aged about 47 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, T.W.D. Middle School, Sudru, Block- Pharshabahar, Distt. Jashpyr (C.G.) 2. ^Amar Sai Painkara, S/o Baisakhu Sai, aged about 52 ' years, working as Head Master, T.W.D. Primary School, Suijor, Block- Pharshabal-iar, Distt. Jashpur(C.G.) 3.' Laxmi Ram Nayak, S/o Lakun Ram Nayak, aged about 50 years, working as Head Master, T.W.D. Primary School, Mahuwa.toli, (Amdiha), Block- Pharshabahar, Distt.- Jashpur (C.G.) 4. Bhadu Sai Painkara, S/o Shri Cheranga Sai, aged about -53 years, working as Head Master, T.W.D. Primary School, Mrigkhol, Block-Pharshabahar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) m\ E«I E'E? .l^^^ Mf RESPONDENTS 5. Ramlagan Sai Painkara, S/o Late Shri Sukdeo Sai Painkara, aged about 49 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, T.W.D. Middle School Kandai Bahar, Block- Pharshabahar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, Distt. -Jashpur ^ (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Pharshabahar, Distt. Jashpur ^ (C.G.) 4. Treasury Officer, Treasury, Accoxints & Pension, Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1.. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As mentioned in the cause title above ^y .^"\^. ?/ ,-SS-^. A •81 .^% *-' iV •Ki -i ^ MIGH COURTOFCHl-WmSGARH:BILASPUR PETn-IQNERS RESPONDENTS WRtTE>ETltlG> (SyN0.23140R2010 Jagdish Prasad Gupta & Others Vereus State of Ohhattisgarh & Others (WritPetifiQnuritterArtiGleZSSofttieConsfitutiQnoflndi^ SingleBench:MC>n'bleShriSatishK.-Agnihatri,J.; Present:- Qowri ShriiSomkantVemna,Acivoeatefbrthepetjtioners. ShriP.K.Bhaduri.Panell.avvverfortheState. OFiDEFtfQRAl.) (Passed on this6m day of May,2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitionerS submits that the petitioners were appointed initially as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay on probation. ftfter Bompletion ofWeir respective probation penod, the pigtitionere were granted regylar pay scaie. Learned cpunsel further submite that the issue irivolved in the case is asto whether the petitioners are entitled td reguiar pay scale w.e./; the date of initial appoiritment oraftercompietionoTpFobationperiod. 2. Leamed counsel fbF the parti^tjbintly submit that the isSueinvolyed herein was Gonsidered by the.Maclhya Pradesh State AdministraUve Trihunal,Jabalpur(.^^crt^SAninOA^o.2745/89^^^^^ ya(^ancf56off)erevs.S(ateo^MP.Softe^,whereinKwashe!dthat thesimilailysituafeclfeaGhersareentifiedtoregdarpayscateW.ft/.the date of initial appointment. The matteF was taken up tp the Supreme Courf.TheappealwasdismissectbytheSupreme.Gourf.uphoidingthe decision of the Tribuna! to the effect that the Teachers?tesis(ant Teachers are entitled to reguiar pay scate from date of initial apppintment. ^ :• ' 1:; ••' ' '::: •- ~. / .. .. . ;" :: : 1 3. tn view of the above submissjons made by learnett counset for the parties, the pefitionere are granted liberty to mal®representatipns tolhe Tssponyeritauthorities,)fsoa(^sed,toconsidertHeirGasesandp^ appropriate order;on ite cwo merit and in its pe(Spe(rtive,-iri the light of the order passed by the SAT inY^tecftttonf V^cte ^upra)^^ OT^ SybsequentlyfwnfinTied bytheSupremSCoyrtjh Speciail.egve Petition (Cnfil)Np.6892ra3by6nlerdated 3-1-1994. 4. Accordingly.lhewrit petition istlispbsed of. ^s^