1 conp797 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 7 OF 1997 Dwarkanath Sobnath Mishra ...Petitioner V/s. Dhirubhai Maneklal Mehta & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Gaurang Shah i/by Mr. N.V. Vimadalal for the Petitioner Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P., for the State. CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: 5TH JANUARY, 2011 P.C.:- The counsel for the petitioner states, on instructions, that the matter has been amicably settled between the private parties, and it has been agreed between them that the petitioner will not pursue the present contempt action. In the circumstances, the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this remedy any further. 2. In view of the office remark that the matter is not traceable, we called upon the counsel for the petitioner to re-construct the record. 2 conp797 He submits that even his papers have been taken away by his client. Even so, he may take necessary steps in that behalf. 3. We, however, dispose of this petition as not pressed by the petitioner. A.R. JOSHI, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.