IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.786 of 2010 RAVITA KUMARI @ RAVITA DEVI W/O SANJAY KUMAR R/O VILL- AURAHI, P.S. KISHANPUR, DISTT. SUPAUL Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR SOCIAL WELFARE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE COLLECTOR SUPAUL 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER SARAY GARH, BHAPTIYAHI, DISTT. SUPAUL 5. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER BHAPTIYAHI (SARAYGARH) SUPAUL, DISTT. SUPAUL 6. YASHODA RANI W/O MUKESH KUMAR R/O VILL- AURAHI, P.S. KISHANPUR, DISTT. SUPAUL ----------- 2/ 01.07.2010 Petitioner’s prayer is for a direction to the respondents for consideration of her candidature and selection for the post of Anganbari Sevika. Petitioner’s case is that the eligibility criteria for being selected on the post of Anganbari Sevika, respondent No. 6, who belongs to rich family and thus, being selected for the post in place of the petitioner. Petitioner has alleged that selection of respondent No. 6 has been made in violation of the guidelines for selection of Anganbari Sevika. Under the guidelines, in case of non-consideration in the matters of selection or wrong selection, the aggrieved persons have remedy to file objection/applicaition before the District Magistrate, as who is the authority competent to make selection. Since the petitioner has not exhausted the remedy available to her, this application is being disposed of giving liberty for filing her objection before the District Magistrate, Supaul, within one month from today. In case of filing such an objection by the petitioner, it should be considered and - 2 - disposed of following the procedure, as provided under the guidelines for selection of AVS, within one month of the filing of the objection by the petitioner. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)