(50 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. [Art 227} NO. 7489(2011 PETITIONERS! 1(A) Rajkumari aged about 45 yams, PLAINTIFFs D/ o Bramhanand, R/ o Tikarapara, Raipur Tahsil 83 Distt. Raipur (C.G.). (B) Krishna Kumar S/o Bramhanand, aged about 35 years, R/o Ambagarh Chowki, Tahsil Chowki, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.). (C) Shashikant aged about 30 years, S/o Bramhanand, R/o Ambagarh Chowki, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 2. Indrani Bai W/o Bramhanand, aged about 65 years, R/o Ambagarh Chowki, Tahsil Chowki, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.). VERSU§ RESPONDENTS ’ Sajednra @ Dinesh Kumar, aged DEFENDANTS about 24 years, Sf o Ram Narayan Pandey, near Santoshi Mandir, Dr. L.N. Dixit, Santoshi Mandir, Tahsil 85 Distt. Raipur (C.G.). an 2. State of M.P. now Chhattisgarh through Collector, Durg (C.G.). Morid, Tahsil Patan Distt. Durg (C.G.). 3. Sadaram Dujeram Verma, S/o 4. Yashwant Sahu, aged about 32 . years, S/o Anandram Sahu, Smt. Thaneshwari Sahu, aged about 28 years, W/o Yashwant Sahu, Both R/o Modd, Tahsil Patan, Distt. Durg (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ISB :Hon’bie Mr. T.F.Sharma, J.) Present:— None for the petitioners. Shn' Sumit Jhanwar, P.L. for the State/respondent No. 2. Respondents Np. 1 85 3 to 5 not noticed. ORDER (Passed on 12/12/2011) 1. None for the petitioners When the pass over case is called out for 2nd time hearings 2 Order dated 31/ 10/ 2011 passed by District Judge Durg (C.G.) in civil suit Np. 5A] 2011 Vvehereby‘ application filed under Order 1 r (M Rule 10 0f the C.P.C. filed on behalf of the petitioners has been dismissed perused. 3. After considering the application that alleged person has purchased the property during pendency of the suit therefore he will be governed by Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, Court below has. dismissing the application. While dismissing application Court below has not committed any illegality requiring any interference in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction. Consequently, petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. 4. Interim application is also dismissed. %¥"§a////l I y, \ ‘ L ' T.P.Sharma/ judge ’ ' l "