IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.118 OF 2003 Shri Namdeo Ramchandra Bobade and others. ... Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents Mr.Sanjeev Kumar for petitioners. Mr. C,J. Sawant, Senior Advocate i/by Ms. Lata Desai for respondent No. 3. Ms. Aparna Murlidharan i/by Mr. P.G. Lad for respondent No.4. Mr. V.A. Sonpal, `A' Panel Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : ANIL R. DAVE, C. J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 25TH MARCH, 2010 P.C. This PIL has been filed in relation to the accommodation which was proposed to be given to Mathadi workers. It appears that some of the Mathadi workers had deposited the amount for allotment of residential flats. However, the flats have not been allotted to them. It is also alleged that some of the Mathadi workers who have been allotted flats had disposed of the same and, therefore, some irregularities have been committed by the Mathadi workers. 2. The matter was heard at length from time to time. Now in the affidavit dated 10th March, 2010, filed by the Secretary of the respondent -Board wherein it has been stated that the Board has formulated a comprehensive revised scheme. 3. Looking to the fact that the scheme has already been implemented, in our opinion, grievance of the petitioners does not survive and, therefore, we dispose of the petition. 4. So far as prayers with regard to initiation of criminal proceedings against some officers of the respondent No.1 Board are concerned, we have been told that criminal proceedings have already been initiated and, therefore, we do not see any need to give any further direction with regard to the criminal proceedings. 5. It has been also stated by learned Senior Advocate Shri Sawant that the amount borrowed from Canara Bank for the purpose of construction of flats has been partly repaid and the unpaid amount will be paid as soon as possible upon receipt of the sale proceeds from the flats in question. 6. In view of the above development in the matter, the petition stands disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.