S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6685/2002. Smt. Sunita Goyal Vs. Union of India & Ors. Date Of Order ::: 07/03/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain J. Mrs. Suman Sharma, advocate, for Ms. Gayatri Rathore, Counsel for the Petitioner Mr. Sushil Sharma, Counsel for respondent no.1 Mr. M.D. Agarwal, Counsel for respondent no.2 Mr. Anuroop Singhi, Counsel for respondent no.3 Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 Shri M.D. Agarwal, submits that this writ petition has become infructuous, as the construction of the road has already been completed, therefore, it may be dismissed as such. The matter was listed before this Court on 10.10.2007. Learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to seek instructions in the matter. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client has not come and contacted, therefore, she is unable to give any statement in this regard. She further submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous on the basis of the statement of the learned counsel for the respondent no.2. In view of the statement of the learned counsel for the respondent no.2, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. ashok/