IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33856 of 2010 MD.NAUSHAD @ SHERAFGUN & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 3.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned P.P. for the State. Complainant purchased a jeep from one Amod Rai and the said Aamod Rai did not hand over the aforesaid vehicle to the complainant. So far as petitioners are concerned, it is stated that they were instrumental in the aforesaid transaction. Learned counsel for the petitioners points out that reason for false implication of petitioners is that Saiyda Begum wife of the complainant Md Ayub @ Lal Babu filed Complaint case no. 2625C/2009 against him and in the complaint case, petitioner no.1 stood as witness and so far petitioner no.2 is concerned, he is brother- in-law of petitioner no.1. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners( Md Naushad @ Sherafgun and Abdullah Salami) in the event of arrest/ surrender within 30 days from the date of communication of the order be released on bail in connection with Complaint Case no. 19C of 2010 Tr. No.3365/2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Rajeev Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Bettiah, West Champaran subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J))