IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL WRIT No. 1619 of 2007 HARSH TANEJA & ORS. V/S UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Mr. SUKESH BHATI, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. KULDEEP MATHUR, for the respondent Mrs.R.R.KANWAR, AGA Date of Order : 21.5.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the parties. Respondents in their reply in Para 9 have contended that the petitioners have not provided any data/information of fly ash bricks being manufactured. In Para 10 it is stated that the Chief Engineer, Bathinda zone has already included the incorporation of fly ash bricks in CA No.CEBTZ-06/05-06 even though the estimates of the work did not originally include the higher cost of fly ash bricks. This however is not possible for other works, where in no saving was accruing and item of fly ash bricks was not originally included in the estimates and the estimates could not be framed to include fly ash bricks since there was no production, and then in Para 11 it has been stated that now all estimates prepared for the major works for financial year 2006-07 are being included with fly ash bricks and shall accordingly be tendered for. In my view, this redresses the grievances of the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of in view of above stand of the respondents. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /jpa