IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.459 of 2006 AJAY KUMAR SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. P. N. Sahi, Adv., For the opposite party : Mrs. Aparna Kumari, Adv., For the State : Mr. Gopesh Kumar, APP. 4. 24.7.2008. This Cr. Revision has been filed by the petitioner/informant for setting aside the judgment dated 18th February 2006 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge-cum-Fast Track Court No. IV, Madhepura in Criminal Appeal No. 6 of 2002 thereby he allowed the appeal of the opposite parties and set aside the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 21.3.2002 passed by Sri R. K. Singh, Judicial Magistrate, IInd Class, Madhepura in G. R. no. 285 of 1997/Trial No. 83 of 2002. The judicial magistrate by the said judgment had convicted the opposite parties under Section 448/427 I.P.C. and sentenced them to undergo simple imprisonment for six months on each count. I have heard both the parties at great length and also perused the impugned judgment. The grounds for acquittal taken in the impugned judgment are just and legal. Apart from ground of non examination of I. O. and inconsistency - 2 - and contradiction in evidence of informant and other witnesses learned sessions judge has also considered the effect of non-examination of accused persons under Section 313 Cr.P.C. after examination of court witnesses on material points and admission of documentary evidence. Absolutely, I find no scope to interfere in the finding of learned sessions judge under the revisional jurisdiction. Accordingly, this Cr. Revision is rejected at the admission stage itself. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)