IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION (1) Contempt Petition No. 104 of 2008 In the matter of Power Control and Appliances (Bombay) Ltd. Gujrat Petrosynthesis Ltd. ..Petitioner Mr.Dinesh Pednekar for petitioner. Mr.A.P.Shah for respondents. In the matter of Sumeet Research and Holdings Pvt.Ltd. Gujrat Petrosynthese Ltd. ..Petitioner Mr.Dinesh Pednekar for petitioner. Mr.D.P.Shah for respondent. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. J. J. 26th June 2008 26th June 2008 26th June 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. In both these matters the parties inform me that the claim is settled. The Company has admitted its liability and agreed to pay to the petitioner sums mentioned in clause 2 of the consent terms in the manner set out in clause 3 and there is undertaking to the Court that the same would be paid as stated therein. The consequences in default are also provided. The petitioner and respondents have after negotiations agreed to these terms. For the petitioner and respondents their respective authorised signatories have signed the terms. The terms are drawn after both sides fully appreciated the implications and consequences flowing therefrom. The terms have been drawn willingly and the same are being tendered after being duly signed by Advocate as well. Both sides confirm that the terms reflect complete agreement between the parties. 2. In such circumstances, the consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. Order in terms of the consent terms at X. Undertakings contained in clause 3 are accepted. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)