IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 275 OF 2009 SHRI. CAETAN RAFEAL D'MELLO ... Petitioner Versus SMT. MUKTEM BUDU THAKUR AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Ms. Asha Dessai, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 16th June, 2009 P.C. Heard. 2. Petitioner is the plaintiff in Regular Civil Suit No. 82/1991/A. In this petition the challenge is to the order dated 22.1.2009 of the learned Civil Judge Junior Division by which the application filed by him for amendment of the plaint has been rejected, as irrelevant. 3. The plaintiff had filed the suit with the allegations that the defendants who had a structure of 6.5 X 7 square metres had extended it by over 100 metres and had sought the demolition of the extension. It appears that the complaints were also filed before the authorities under the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 who had passed orders from time to time. It is these orders which the plaintiff sought to produce by way of amendment. It appears that the defendants had also obtained declaration that the defendants are the mundcars. In case the plaintiff succeed i.e. that the defendants have extended the structure then the plaintiff would succeed in the suit. Learned Civil Judge Junior Division was right that the amendment was irrelevant. The plaintiff is always at liberty to produce the said documents/orders of different authorities by seeking leave of the Court, in case it is permissible in law. Amendment of plaint was not at all necessary. This is not a fit case to entertain the petition under the extra ordinary jurisdiction. Hence, dismissed. N. A. BRITTO, J. at*