IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated : Nainital the April 20th, 2006 Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.318 of 2006 Order on the bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Satish S/o Shri Lachmi R/o village Manak, Majra P.S. Bhagwanpur District Haridwar …Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal … Opposite Party Arising out of case crime No.80 of 2005 Under Sections 304-B, 120-B IPC P.S. Bhagwanpur District Haridwar ________________________________________________________ _ Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Heard Sri Subhash Chandra Tyagi learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. Perused the record. The statement recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C. has been annexed with the bail application and the case diary is available with the learned A.G.A. There is no whisper in the statement recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C. that the applicant treated the deceased cruelly in connection with the dowry demand immediately before the death. It has come only in the statement of Akshah Kumar that there was a dispute with regard to the dowry. He has also stated that a panchayat was also convened and the deceased was taken to her matrimonial house. It was contended that there is no evidence against the present applicant. Considering the contentions, facts and circumstances of the case, it is a fit case for bail. Let the applicant-accused be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned, Roorkee. Dated 20.04.2006 (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) LSR