IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13067 of 2011 SURENDRA PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 10 of the Bihar Conduct of Examination Act. The accusation against the petitioner, being Center Superintendent, is that he has not followed the directions given by the informant for posting some teachers at the entrance and for doing checking in the examination rooms, since two girls were found doing unfair means in the examination. It is submitted by learned Sr. counsel for the petitioner that the accusation does not constitute an offence under Section 10 of the Bihar Conduct of Examination Act against the petitioner and moreover, the directions were carried out otherwise in stead of two students, large number of students might to had been detected adopting unfair means. 2 Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 70/2011, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)