IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT FRIDAY, THE 2ND MAY 2008 / 12TH VAISAKHA 1930 WP(C).No. 13321 of 2008(J) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- MUSALIAR EDUCATION TRUST, MUSALIAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, P.B.NO.7, KUMBAZHA P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, HAJI M. IBRAHIMKUTTY. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA. 5. SUDHAKARAN PILLAI, C.I. OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. S.U. NAZAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/05/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT, J ------------------------------------ W.P(C).No.13321 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of May, 2008 JUDGMENT The short grievance of the petitioner is that no action has been taken on a complaint filed by the petitioner before the 5th respondent. It is prayed that directions may be issued under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to register a crime and to conduct a proper investigation. 2. In the light of the decision in Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P [2008 AIR SCW 309], the prayer of the petitioner cannot obviously be entertained. No exceptional or compelling reasons are shown to exist. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after the filing of this Writ Petition, the 5th respondent appears to be initiating some action. Even otherwise the petitioner cannot succeed in getting any directions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the light of the decision in Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P [2008 AIR SCW 309]. This Writ Petition is dismissed. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) rtr/- 2