1 jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 383 OF 2010 IN APPEAL (L) NO. 326 OF 2009 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1211 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 2674 OF 2006 Sonali Suketu Motla Mumbai ..Applicant/Appellant Vs. Mulchand K.Ranka, Mumbai and 4 others ..Respondents .... Mr.Santosh Shetty for Appellant in support of Notice of Motion Mr.Zubair Dada, Mr.Vishal Kanade, M.Dada i/b i.C.Legal for Respondent No.1 Mr.A.A.Pande for Respondent No.3(a) & (b). Ms.Brigitta John i/b Wadia Ghandy & Co. for Respondent No.4 .... CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : 26th FEBRUARY, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard. Perused the affidavit in support of this Notice of Motion. Appeal under Lodging No. 326 of 2009 has been filed beyond time by 20 days. The learned counsel for the Respondents has opposed 2 the Motion and submitted that there are no valid grounds made out to condone the delay. 2 However, we are satisfied that the delay caused of 20 days, deserves to be condoned and hence, the Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 3 Appeal to be listed for admission after two weeks. [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [ B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. ]