IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 19TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 28TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 25836 of 2006(A) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- THE KERALA STATE ENGINEERING AND INFRASTRUTURE SERVICES CO-OPERATIVE LTD.NO.4448 (KSEICO), 4TH FLOOR, KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK BUILDING, OVERBRIDGE JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,V.VIJAYAN NAIR, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O. VASUDEVAN PILLAI, KAVITHA SADANAM, NANNIYODE, PACHA PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.E.S.M.KABEER. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. K.K.PADMANABHAN, KULANGARAKANDIYIL, NADAKKITHAZHA, VADARAKARA P.O., KOZHIKODE. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MOHAMMED ANZAR .K.J FOR R1 & R2, ADV. SRI.GOPAKUMAR R.THALIYAL FOR R3, ADV. SRI.N.P.PRAJEESH FOR R3. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.25836/2006-A: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE ORDER IN CLAIM PETITION NO. 27/99 DTD. 16/05/2002. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE UNDER SEC. 34 DTD. 19/01/2006. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE UNDER SECTION 7 DTD. 19/01/2006. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE R.1. DTD. 28/08/2006. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. prv. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C).No. 25836 OF 2006 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 19th day of September, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner is aggrieved by Exts.P2 and P3. According to the petitioner, the petitioner society is not liable to meet the amount awarded as per Ext.P1 claim petition. It is for the petitioner to point out the same before the 2nd respondent in which case the matter be duly examined by the 2nd respondent. In order to enable the petitioner to work out the relief as above, the interim order will continue for another three months. It is made clear that while orders are passed in this matter, petitioner and 3rd respondent will be afforded an opportunity of hearing. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) ttb