IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 8TH OCTOBER 2010 / 16TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 27190 of 2010(W) PETITIONER: --------------- D.PADMA, W/O.STANLY WILSON, AGED 46 YEARS, H.S.A.(MATHS), CRYSTAL HOUSE, T.C.11/633, NANTHANCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, (GENERAL EDUCATION), SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. MANAGER, A.M.H.S.S., THIRUMALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C). NO. 27190 OF 2010 W ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 8th day of October, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner, who is working as H.S.A. (Maths) in A.M.H.S.S., Thirumala, claimed promotion as HSST. The Manager rejected the request of the petitioner. The petitioner filed appeal to the Director of Higher Secondary Education against that decision. The appeal was rejected by the Director of Higher Secondary Education, as per Ext.P2 order dated 16.9.2009. The petitioner filed Ext.P3 revision before the Government. As per Ext.P4 notice, hearing of Ext.P3 revision was fixed to be held on 26.3.2010. According to the petitioner, the matter was heard by the first respondent and the first respondent directed the second respondent, Director of Higher Secondary Education, to furnish a report. No report was submitted by the Director. As per Ext.P5 memo dated 2.8.2010, the first respondent requested the Director to furnish the report. The grievance of the petitioner is that in spite of Ext.P5, the Director has not furnished the report to the Government. W.P.(C) NO.27190 OF 2010 :: 2 :: 2. The learned Government Pleader, on written instructions dated 9.9.2010, submitted that the Deputy Director conducted an enquiry on 6.9.2010 and the enquiry report would be sent to the Government immediately. This submission is recorded. Since the instruction was dated 9.9.2010, the learned Government Pleader submitted that, the report would have been sent to the first respondent. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in these circumstances, the first respondent may be directed to dispose of the revision expeditiously. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 revision as expeditiously as possible and, at any rate, within a period of two months. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/