wp9805­10.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9805 OF 2010 Sadashiv Rama Gurav & Ors. .. Petitioner Versus Mahadeo Ramchandra Gurav & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.P.D.Dalvi for petitioner Mr.Ravindra Chingale i/b. Abhay Nevgi & Associates for respondent Nos. 1 to 3, 5 and 6. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 29th July 2011. P.C.: 1] The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the Additional Collector, Sangli and Additional Commissioner, Pune. Both orders are made during the course of proceedings under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. If there was a partition in the family or not and who are parties to the said partition and how the properties are divided are all matters which are within the competence of civil court. The proceedings are pending in the Civil Court. It is only subject to those proceedings and the final orders therein that the entries wp9805­10.doc 2 have been maintained. 2] To my mind, the exercise undertaken does not prejudice the petitioner in any manner. It will be open for him to point out to the civil court that the partition ought to be effected in accordance with law and as and when the final orders in the civil suit are passed, the authorities under the land revenue ode will have to abide by the same. 3] For all these reasons, there is no case made out for interference. Writ Petition is dismissed. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)