r C f^\-r^L- ^i;-;. - %^;-^ ^f—. ^' ® IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. ^lol / 2006 PETITIONER < Smt. Anjali Mehra, W/o. Shri T.D. Mehra, aged about 45 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Girl's Hr. Sec. School- Kondagaon, Block Kondagaon, Distt. - (Bastar) (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS <6? o .^w--- .^s^ ^•y^y' ^m^ .^'^ ^^. ~^^ State of Chhattisgarh & Others Through- The Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Tribal We!fare Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Distt. -Jagdalpur ( Bastar) (C.( WRIT PETU10N UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WR!T,_ DIRECTION ETC TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. HI6H COURT OF CHHATHSeARH AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J, W. P. (s) No. 7096 of 2006 Petitioner Awadhesh Kumar Pandey Respondents versus State of ChhatTisgarh and others W P (s.) N0. 7097 of 2006 Petitioner Smt. Radheswari Patel versus Respondents State of Chhattis9arh and others W P (s.) N0. 7098 of 2006 Petitioner Smt. Mridula Jofar versus Respondents State of Chhattis9arh and ottiers W P (s.) N0. 7099 of 2006 Petitioner Akhi!esh Kumar Singh versus Resppndents Sta-te of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner Respondents Respondents Petitioner Resoondents Petitioner ResBpndent^ W T-Ts:) N0. 7100 of 2006 Risabh Kumar Jain versus State of ChhattiS9arh and others W P (s.) N0. 7101 of 2006 Petitioner : Smt. Anjali Mehra versus State of Chhattisgarh and o'riiers W P fa.) N0. 7102 of 2006 ©opalDewongan yersus State of Chhattisgarh and others And W P (s.) N0. 7103 of 2006 Nokul Singh Netam versus State of Chhcttisgarh and others Present : Mr. Anil Singh Rajput, counsel for the petitioners Miss Sunita Jain, Panel lawyer for -tiie State/respondents. OR D ER (Passed on -rfiis 20th day of December, 2006) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as also for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar' Bhmwdwaj vs. Municipal Caporation. Dwy and anothe^ . 2. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions are disposed of in ter-ms of the decision of this Court in the matter of yodfwant ^jmar Bhatvdwaj^'Suyra). subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T-I. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circutars dated 24-12-1998 ond 1-3-1999 and further whether they hwe been paid two advonce increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on the record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Ag Judge 1 2006Cn)ttPJR-C696 ;abiu