IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.10049 of 2008 Decided on: May 4, 2011. Surinder Kumar …….Petitioner. Versus The State of H.P. and others. …….Respondents. _________________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr.Ranjan Shrama, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr.R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr.J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner approached this Court with several grievances in respect of disciplinary proceedings initiated against him. In view of the intervening developments, what survives is only the issue of restoration of pay. Placing reliance on FR 29(2) read with Government Instruction No.2(b)(i), it is submitted that the petitioner is entitled to restoration of pay. This aspect of the matter is not seen adverted to in the reply. 2. The petitioner may, hence, file representation alongwith a copy of this judgment before the third respondent within six weeks from today. The third respondent shall look into the same adverting to the submission made in the representation and take appropriate action thereon, in accordance with law, within another four months. In case the petitioner requests for an opportunity of hearing, the same shall also be granted to him. Consequential benefits, if any, to which the petitioner is found eligible shall also be disbursed within another two months. 2 3. With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice May 4, 2011 (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (mlg/tilak) Judge.