1 wp1691.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 1691 of 2011 Sunil Chintaman Ketkar ... Petitioner v/s. Chandrabhan M. Tibrewala & ors. ... Respondents Mr. S.G. Gokhale for the petitioner. Mr. S.Shah i/b. Makarand Gandhi & co. for respondents 5, 8 and 6. CORAM:- B.R. GAVAI, J DATED :- MARCH 21, 2011. P.C. The petition arises out of purely interlocutory order vide which an application for amendment of plaint has been rejected. 2. The learned trial Court has given cogent and sound reasons while rejecting the application. In any event, in case the petitioner fails in the suit and is required to file an appeal, he can very well challenge the order 2 wp1691.11.sxw impugned herein in view of provisions of Order 43 Rule 1A of CPC. Hence, rejected. (B.R. GAVAI, J)