1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.4485/2002. : : Raghunandan Verma Vs. Rajasthan Civil Service Appellate Tribunal & Ors. : : Date of Order 18.11.2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr.S.P.Sharma for the petitioner. Mr.Hemant Gupta, Addl.Govt.Counsel for the State. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was Forest Guard in the Forest Department and was compulsorily retired vide order dated 19.5.2000. Learned counsel for the petitioner after making some arguments admitted that number of other Forest Guard who were compulsorily retired in the like manner represented the respondents and their representations have been considered and decided by higher authorities allowing them to rejoin the duties. It is submitted that a similar direction be issued in the present case. This writ petition seeking to challenge the order of compulsory retirement has remained pending before this 2 Court for last more than six years. If any such move was taken by the respondents, nothing prevented the petitioner to represent his case before the Committee set up by the respondents. In any case, without interfering the order of compulsory retirement, it is considered appropriate to give liberty to the petitioner to make such representation to respondents giving instances of such similarly situated employees, who according to him, were taken back in service. If such representation is made, the respondent No.1 shall decide and consider the same within three months. This writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/- Item No.21.