c' ^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIIASPUR(C.G. ) 1(ii.P.(C) N0. PETITIONER J-04- OF 2007 ^ Basant Banjara.son of shri Tula Rara Banjara.aged about 34 years, sarpanch of Gram panchayat Kolihadeori.Tehsil- ,>•''''''r.>-SV^\}y" Basna.District Mahasamund(C.G.) ^^*!-" VE R SU S CS^- <^^--"">' ^ESPONDENTS o .^ ^ ^\°1 ^ »»• / 1. state of chhattisgarh.through Secretary.panchayat D.K.s.Bhawan.Raipur .Di-strict- Raipur(C.G.) 2. Kundan Lal.son o£ Thakur Ram Panch, Gram Panchayat Kolihadeori Tehsll-Basna.Dlstrict-Mahasamund, (C.G.) 3. D-i.rector, panchayat, Raipur,(C.o.) ^ 4. The Collector.Mahasamund, Distcict-Mahasamund,(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDEK ARTICI^ 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OE INDIA. IN THB HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WritPtetition (Q No. 104/2007 Petitioaer : Basant Banjara - Versus- Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh & others Shri Sunil Sahu^Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A. S. Kachwaha, Govt. Advocate for the respondents No. 1, 3 and 4. None for the respondent No.2. h..- O R DE R (Passed on tfais 13th day ofPebmaiy, 2007) Thte order ofthe Court is passed by Justice Satish K. Agnihotd. By this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of ludia fhe petitioner chaUcnges the validity of fhe order dated 8.1.2007 (Annexure P/10), passed m Appeal Case No, 40/A- 89(3)/05-06 by fhe Dircctor Panchayat, Chliattisgarh, Raipur. Aceorduig to leamed coiuisel for the petitioner fhe fourth child of fhe petitioner was boru ou 16.1.2001 for which he has produced a certificate of fhe poUce station Jaijaipur, District- Janjgir Cham.pa, when adinittedly fhe petitioner was a resident ofviBage Semradeeh, PoUce Station Jaijaipur. The Director Panchayat after having considered aB other certi&cates/documents, issued by the Block Developmcnt Ofiicer, Basna and sterilization operation (fnTnily planiung operation) done, thereafter on 5.4.2003 came to the conclusion fhat the foiirfh chUd of tfae petitioner was bora on 8.2.2003 in his residence at village Kohiladevri. The petitioner concealmg fhe said fact was elected as Sarpanch of fhe Grara Paachayat contrary to fhe provisions ofSection 36 (l) (m) ofthe Panchayat Raj Avain Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993. Upon perusal offhe impugaed order as weB as other documents appended thereto, ia. my opiiuon, there is no mfiniuly in the impi^ned order. Thus, this Court in exercise of its powera under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not mclined to mterfere wifh ftie onier dated 8.1.2007 (Annexure P/10) passed by the Dircctor, Panchayat. The petition is accordmgfy dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur H