IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 16TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 27TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 4184 of 2009(W) OS.1028/2008 of PRL.SUB COURT,THRISSUR PETITIONERS ABDUL KHADER, AGED 59, S/O.ABDUL RAHIMAN, RAYAM MARAKKAR VEETTIL, VATANAPPILLY, CHAVAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.SAGEER IBRAHIM RESPONDENTS: 1. RUKIA, W/O.SAIDU MOHAMMED, CHINNAKAL, KUNDAZHIYOOR, ENGANDIYUR, CHAVAKKAD. 2. MUSAFAR, AGED 30, S/O.RUKIA, CHINNAKAL, KUNDAZHIYOOR, ENGANDIYUR, CHAVAKKAD. 3. JAFAR, AGED 28, S/O.RUKIA, CHINNAKAL, KUNDAZHIYOOR, ENGANDIYUR, CHAVAKKAD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) NO. 4184 OF 2009 W ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 16th February, 2009 JUDGMENT The plaintiff in O.S.No.1028 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Thrissur has filed this Writ Petition for a direction to the Sub Court to dispose of the suit expeditiously. It is stated in the Writ Petition that the suit is for specific performance of an agreement to sell the plaint schedule property and that the suit is now posted for evidence to 26.2.2009. 2. Information was gathered from the learned Subordinate Judge. The learned Subordinate Judge informed the Registry that after filing the written statement, the suit was posted for framing issues on 6.2.2009. There was no sitting on 6.2.2009 and the case was adjourned to 27.3.2009. Issues have not been framed. Balance court fee has not been paid. It is not proper for the petitioner to approach the High Court at this stage stating that the case is posted for evidence. The averments in the Writ Petition are not correct. The Writ Petition does not deserve consideration and it is accordingly dismissed. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/