IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28946 of 2010 MANOJ RAJAK Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 10.08.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the petition. Petitioner is languishing in jail since 12.04.2010 in a case registered under Sections 302, 201, 379, 34 of the I.P.C. Admittedly there is no eye witness to the occurrence and on suspicion petitioner’s name sprang up during investigation. Though sanha was lodged by the deceased against other accused persons and their relatives but not against the petitioner. The impugned order reflects that petitioner has serious criminal history but in paragraph 12 of the petition, petitioner has stated that in most of the cases petitioner has either been acquitted or is on bail. Learned counsel for the State submits that though petitioner’s name sprang up only on suspicion but he has criminal history. Considering the fact that petitioner’s name sprang up only on the basis of suspicion, let the petitioner namely Manoj Rajak, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with 2 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Purnea Sadar P.S. Case No. 114 of 2010. In view of the criminal history of the petitioner, learned Court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner on two eventuality firstly if the petitioner fails to appear on three consecutive dates and secondly if he gets involved in any case henceforth. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)