IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8127 of 2009 Smt.Rinki Devi Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors 2/ 05/08/2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved by denial of appointment after selection on the post of Angan Bari Sevika. The law stands well settled that mere selection does not vest a right to appointment. The Court finds that the counter affidavit mentions cogent grounds for denial of the benefit of selection. The petitioner undoubtedly has a right to question those findings, but the forum has to be different. Learned counsel for the State has raised a preliminary objection to the remedy available before the District Magistrate for any perceived grievance of any wrongful denial of appointment. If the petitioner files an application before the District Magistrate within 30 days from today let him consider the same and after hearing all concerned, including respondent Nos.8 to 11 dispose off the matter by a reasoned and speaking order preferably within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this 2 order. The writ application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)