IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1319 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.1319 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.1319 OF 2005 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:------------------------------------ Ms.S.D.Sawant for the petitioners. Mr.R.D.Rane for respondent nos.3 and 5. CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATED: 30TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 DATED: 30TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 DATED: 30TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 P.C.: . In view of the statement made in paragraph 12 of the affidavit in reply as under: "12. With reference to paragraph 18 of the petition, it is submitted that by the corrigendum, dated 24.10.2002, it has been provided that the prescribed age limit of the candidates in the merit lists prepared as per G.R. dated 10.3.2000 and dated 12.7.2001, should not be applied or considered while implementing the G.R., dated 21.20.2002." The petition does not survive as there will be no grievance left to the petitioner if the G.R. dated 24.10.2002 is implemented. The petition is disposed of accordingly. ...