IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5853 of 2002 SHANTI DEVI AGARWAL Versus THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & OR ----------- 4. 17.4.2009 Having perused the prayer at the scope of this writ application this much is clear that merely because a fixed period of lease of house will be over, that will not give either the Sub-divisional Officer under the B.B.C.Act an authority to pass an order for eviction or refusal thereof the petitioner to avail writ jurisdiction before this Court. Mr. Tara Kant Jha, learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Reserve Bank of India and also other respondents would only point out that this writ application is wholly misconceived. In the opinion of this Court the respondents are correct. This application is out and out a misconceived writ application and is accordingly dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/