1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 2335 OF 1994 Mohan Shamrao More & another .. PETITIONERS. VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Others ..RESPONDENTS ... Shri H.A. Joshi, Advocate for Petitioners Shri N.B. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent State Shri M.P. Tripati h/f Shri K.J. Ghute Patil, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM :- B.R.GAVAI AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA JJ. DATE : 9th MAY, 2010. PER COURT: By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges Rules for recruitment as like Stock Supervisor. The recruitment in question was of 1994. The petitioner at the time of filing of petition were aged about 28 years, now they would be about 42 years of age. Even if we decide the question of the validity of the Rules, the said decision would be purely of an academic interest. This Court had refused to 2 grant any interim relief. 2. In view of huge pendency of the cases, we do not find that it would in the interest of justice to decide the academic question. In that view of the matter, Writ Petition is disposed of having rendered infructuous. Rule is discharged. [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J ] [B.R.GAVAI, J ] SDM* 2335.94WP