IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:16592 of 1995 Between: T.Nageswara Rao S/o. Sri T.Seshagiri Rao Central Bank of India, R.P.Road, Secunderabad-500 003. ..... PETITIONER AND The Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, R.P.Road, Secunderabad-500 003. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:none appeared The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate relief or order or direction directing the respondent to take action in adjusting the bills submitted by him against the advances sanctioned for the said purpose.” When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 15.12.2008, the petitioner in person was not present in the Court. Even today, when the case is posted under the caption “for Dismissal”, neither the petitioner in person nor any one representing him is present in the Court. It is, therefore, reasonable to presume that the petitioner in person is not interested in pursuing his cause in the writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in default. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition in default, WPMP.No.20258 of 1995 filed by the petitioner in person for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 16th DECEMBER, 2008. kvni