IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 24TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 2ND ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 27474 of 2010(H) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SRI.T.N.NARAYAN, AGED 55, S/O.NARAYAN, THEKKUMKATTIL, METHIRI P.O., RAMAPURAM, KOTTAYAM-686 576. BY ADV. SMT.R.RANJINI. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM-686 576. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, RAMAPURAM, KOTTAYAM- 686 576. 3. SMT.SULOCHANA, MEPRAMADATHIL, METHIRI P.O., RAMAPURAM, KOTTAYAM-686 576. 4. SRI.VINOD.G.INCHIVELICKAKATHU, METHIRI P.O., RAMAPURAM, KOTTAYAM-686 576. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR, R2 BY SRI. P.P. THAJUDHEEN, SC, KSEB. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/09/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ---------------------------- W.P.(C)No.27474 of 2010 ---------------------------- Dated 24th September, 2010 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner is with respect to the proposal to draw electric line through his property for the purpose of giving electric connection to respondents 3 and 4. Evidently, based on the objection raised by the petitioner the second respondent referred the matter for consideration to the first respondent. Admittedly, the matter is now pending before the first respondent. Hence, this writ petition cannot be entertained at this stage. That apart, in case the order goes against the petitioner, it would certainly be open to the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the first respondent. But, the apprehension of the petitioner is that in case an order favourable to respondents 3 and 4 is passed then, the second respondent might take hasty action to draw line without giving sufficient time to the petitioner to challenge the same. It is only an apprehension. That apart, I do not think that the second respondent would resort to such a hasty action to deny the aggrieved party an opportunity to resort to appropriate remedy. With the above observation this writ petition is closed. C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS