IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC SATURDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2011 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32245 of 2011(E) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- P.SUDHA, 142, ULLOOR GARDENS, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 011. BY ADV. SRI.S.VISHNU RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, WATER WORKS (NORTH) SUB DIVISION, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 003. 4. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, WATER WORKS SECTION NO.VI, PONGUMMOODU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-605 011. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NATIONAL HIGHWAY DIVISION, POST MASTER GENERAL (PMG) JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 033. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED SHAH R2 TO R4 BY ADV. SMT.AMBIKA DEVI, SC, KWA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/12/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.32245/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1- TRUE COPY OF THE MASS PETITION DATED 15.9.2011 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2- TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3- TURE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 16.9.2011 OF MLA TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 27.10.2011 SENT BY REGISTERED POST TO THE IST AND 2ND RESPONDENTS. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 32245 of 2011 E ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ext.P1 is the complaint made by the petitioner and others complaining of shortage of water in Ulloor area of Thiruvananthapuram Corporation. On Ext.P1, an enquiry seen to have been conducted and Ext.P2 report has been submitted to the Assistant Executive Engineer of Kowdiar Sub Division. Further action has not been taken to redress the grievance of the petitioner and that is complained of in this writ petition. 2. Heard both sides. 3. According to the petitioner, reason for the delay in the matter is that sanction has not been accorded by the fifth respondent. 4. Now that the matter is pending before the third respondent, I direct him to make a proposal to the fifth respondent, who, thereupon, will consider the same and W.P.(C) No.32245/2011 : 2 : pass orders within four weeks from the date of submission of the proposal. Once such orders are passed, necessary action should be taken on Ext.P2 by the third respondent without any further delay. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/03/12 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge