IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.657 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1013 OF 2006. Mr Fazal Kasamali Jaffer. .. Applicant. vs. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. Niranjan Mundargi, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms M. H. Mhatre, A.P.P.,for the State. CORAM: A.R. JOSHI,J. DATE : 19.06.2009. P.C.:- Heard rival submissions. Perused application. There are no any details regarding necessity for the foreign visit of the applicant – convicted accused. Though on earlier four occasions he was so allowed to visit out of India for business purposes, such liberty cannot be treated as a precedent when there is nothing specific so as to require the dire needs for the applicant to remain present at any alleged business meetings. No any details of such business meetings and schedule is given. In the result, the present application stands rejected. A.R. JOSHI,J.