IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1463 of 2011 BIRENDRA BHINDWAR @ BIRENDRA PAHARIYA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 24.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 17 of 2009 registered under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and it appears from perusal of the first information report that after committing dacoity, dacoits had given their mobile number to the informant. Admittedly, alleged occurrence took place on 19.2.2009 and the FIR was lodged on 24.2.2009. Moreover, nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner nor there is anything in the impugned order of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge to show that above stated mobile number belongs to the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Birendra Bhindwar @ Birendra Pahariya be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge FTC No. IV, Supaul in Sessions Trial no. 193/2010 arising out of Birpur P.S. Case no.17/2009. Shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)