:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6411 OF 2008 Dr. Shaikh Ahmed Haji Shaikh Musa ..Petitioner Vs. The Maharashtra Council of Homeopathy and ors. ..Respondents Mr. Dilip Bodake for petitoner. Mr. V.S. Masurkar, GP for respondent nos.1 to 3. CORAM: BILAL NAZKI & CORAM: BILAL NAZKI & CORAM: BILAL NAZKI & J.H. BHATIA,JJ. J.H. BHATIA,JJ. J.H. BHATIA,JJ. Dated: October 06, 2008. Dated: October 06, 2008. Dated: October 06, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The petitioner is not in service of the respondents. He alleges that the date of birth of respondent no.3 has been recorded by the respondent no.2 on the basis of forged certificates and he made a complaint that is not being inquired into. The respondent no.3 is in service from 1980 and entry of his date of birth is made prior to that and from 1992 he is holding the office of registrar which the petitioner is now objecting after 28 years. We fail to understand that what is the locus standi of the :2: petitioner who is not going to be affected as he is not in service at all. It appears that petitioner has some personal rivalry with respondent no.3 and, therefore, this petition has been filed. On the face of it, it appears that the respondent no.3’s date of birth recorded is 1951. Therefore, if the petitioner wants to change the date of birth of respondent no.3, he should seek a remedy by way of a decree from the Civil Court. . Hence, the petition is dismissed. (J.H. Bhatia, J.) (J.H. Bhatia, J.) (J.H. Bhatia, J.) (Bilal Nazki,J.) (Bilal Nazki,J.) (Bilal Nazki,J.)