IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18461 of 2009 1. RAM KRISHNA KUMAR S/O SATYA NARAINH PANDAY R/O VILL. & P.S- SHAMSHER NAGAR, P.S- DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD (BIHAR) Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, AURANGABAD 2. THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, SONE BHAWAN, BIRCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER AURANGABAD 4. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE-CUM-RETURNING OFFICER, DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 5. RADHE SHYAM S/O RAJESHWAR PRASAD SINGH R/O VILL- & P.O- KANAP P.S-DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 6. ARJUN SINGH S/O BRAHMDEO SINGH R/O VILL &P.O- HICHHAN BIGHA, P.S- DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 7. ARVIND YADAV S/O GAVARDHAN YADAV R/O VILL MAKHARA, P.O- SIT=HARI, P.S-DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 8. ARVIND PASWAN S/O GANAURI PASWAN R/O VILL-NWADA, P.O-KANAP, P.S-DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 9. ASHDEO SHARMA S/O LATE PRADIP SHARMA R/O VILL- MUSOPUR KHAIYA, P.O- ARAI ,P.S- DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 10. USHA DEVI W/O RABINDRA SINGH R/O VILL &P.O- HICHHAN BIGHA, P.S-DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 11. KAMLA PRASAD SINGH S/O BRITRA SINGH R/O VILL&P.O- AMAUNA P.S- DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 12. KIRAN DEVI W/O SHASHI KANT SHARMA R/O VILL & P.O SHAMSHERNAGAR, P.S-DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 13. KEDAR SINGH S/O RANGU SINGH R/O VILL- JHHAURI BIGHA, P.O-AMAUNA, P.S- DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANAGABAD 14. DHANANJAY SHARMA S/O BIRJA SHARMA R/O VILL- MUSHOPUR KHAIRA, P.O- ARAI, P.S- DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 15. DHURB KUMAR S/O NARESH SINGH R/O VILL- KERA, P.O- SHAMSHERNAGAR, P.S- DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AAURANGABAD 16. NAGENDRA SINGH S/O KAMESHWAR SINGH R/O VILL- CHETHARUA BIGHA, P.O- SHANSA, P.S- DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 17. PRAMILA DEVI W/O BABAN SAO R/O VILL-EKAUNI, P.S- DAUDNGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 18. MIRCHAND RAM S/O BHANPAT RM R/O VILL & P.O- JAMUAWAN, P.S- DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 19. YOGENDRA KUMAR VERMA S/O JAGDISH MAHTO R/O VILL- MAKHARA, P.O-SIHARI, P.S- DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 20. RAJ KUMAR SINGH S/O RAS BIHARI SINGH R/O VIL- SIMRABAG, P.OCHAUNRI, P.S DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 21. LALAN SINGH S/O MATHURA SISNGH R/O VILL- KERA, P.O SHAMSHERNAGAR, P.S- DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 2 22. BIJAY KUMAR SINGH S/O RAMDEO SINGH R/O VILL BHAKHARUA MORE, P.O EHAKHARUA MORE, P.S DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 23. BISHUNDEO PRASAD CHAURASIA S/O RAM BUILAS CHAURASIA R/O VILL-CHAUNRI, P.S- DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 24. SHIV SHANKAR SHARMA S/O JAMDAM SINGH R/O VILL BIRAI NAWADIH, P.O ARAI, P.S- DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 25. SRI KANT SHARMA S/O RAGHU BANSH SHARMA R/O VILL &P.O- ARAI, P.S- DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 26. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH S/O BINDESHWARI PD. SINGH R/O VILL- CHHAKU BIGHA, P.O KANAY, P.S- DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD 27. SUBHSH SINGH S/O AWADHESH SINGH R/O VILL &P.O- SHAMSHERNAGAR, P.S- DAUDNAGAR, DISTT- AURANGABAD ----------- 02. 14.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, for the State and for the State Election Commission. The petitioner is aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 26.11.2009 in Election Petition No. 02 of 2006 preferred by the petitioner, rejecting the same on the ground that the petitioner had failed to satisfy that he had raised any objections in writing during counting. Learned counsel for the petitioner invites the attention of the Court to paragraphs-14 and 15 of the writ application to submit that the documentary evidence submitted by the petitioner has not been considered. From perusal of the aforesaid paragraphs, the Court does not find any specific plea for any particular documents having been filed during the process of counting with proof in support thereof 3 placed before the Election Tribunal to question the findings of the Election Tribunal based on a discussion of evidence that the petitioner had failed to substantiate and place before it any documentary evidence that in accordance with Rule 79, Sub-clause- 2 of the Bihar Gram Panchayat Rules, the petitioner had filed any written objections. The documents relied upon by him have been adequately considered when the Tribunal states that the petitioner relies on a Fax massage but has failed to prove that it was tendered during the process of counting and/or before declaration of result. The application is dismissed. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)