1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Misc. Civil Application No.847 of 2007. [Rohini W/o Vikram Mahajan] Vs. [Vikram Purshottam Mahajan] ---------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri M. P. Lala Advocate for the petitioner. Coram: A. H. JOSHI, J. Dated: 9th January 2008. 1. None present for the respondent. 2. Even yesterday, none appeared for the respondent though learned Advocate for the respondent had prayed for adjournment on 30-11-2007. 3. Accepting the reasons assigned in the petition namely that the petitioner is residing at Nagpur, while she is required to face the proceedings at Darwa in District Yavatmal, and she has a threat of security as well as resources while attending the 2 proceedings, and in the background that the petition has not been contested or opposed by filing affidavit in reply by the respondent, the application deserves to be allowed in terms of prayer clause 1, and is so allowed. 4. In the circumstances, parties are directed to bear their own costs. JUDGE Sbm