1 WP No.3971/11 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3971 of 2011 Mr.Tanaji Patil and others ... Petitioners versus Mrs.Banabai Jadhav and ors. ... Respondents ... Mr.D.S.Hatle for the petitioners Mr.Sandesh Patil for respondent nos.1 to 5. Mr.Mandar Limaye for the respondent no.6 CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 12th July 2011 P.C. 1. This petition is directed against an order passed on an interlocutory application for injunction and as such calls for no interference in exercise of an extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2. Respondent nos.1 to 5 are the owners of the suit property. Petitioners claim to have purchased the suit property under a sale deed dated 16 April 1979. They claim that they have been put in possession of the property under a sale deed and they have also carried out the construction thereon. Counsel invited my attention 2 WP No.3971/11 to the notice issued by the Thane Municipal Corporation for assessment of the property tax. The notice does not mention the survey number, house number or property number in respect of which it relates. It is not possible to connect the said notice to the suit property. There is no material on record to show that petitioners were in possession of the suit property. The record of rights shows that the property is in possession of the respondent nos.1 to 5. The trial court as well as the lower appellate court have concurrently held that respondents are in possession of the suit property. The view taken by the two courts below that respondents are in possession of the suit property are a possible view of facts and calls for no interference in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Writ Petition is rejected summarily. (D.G.KARNIK, J)