IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27410 of 2008 RAMESH KUMHAR @ RAMESH PANDIT S/O LATE BISHUNI KUMHAR, R/O VILL. WALIPUNAK, P.S. DARAULI, DIST. SIWAN. ---- PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR --- OPP. PARTY. ----------- 05 04.05.2009 The sole petitioner, who is husband, has approached this court seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Sections 302/34 and 201/34 of the Penal Code. As per allegation in the F.I.R., the marriage was solemnized ten years back which was followed by consistent demand of cash as well as motor-cycle and golden chain. It is the informant’s case, that when he last visited the house of the victim he found that the inmates including the husband were subjecting her to cruelty on account of non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry and was threatened to be killed. It is the contention of the petitioner that victim died of a skin decease for which she was given treatment and in course whereof, the victim died. There is no post mortem report or medical report on the record. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, referring to several paragraphs of the case diary submits that in course of investigation, witnesses have supported the case made out in the F.I.R. Having considered the submissions and after going 2 through the materials available on record this court is not satisfied that a case for extension of privilege of anticipatory bail is made out. Accordingly, the application seeking anticipatory bail is rejected. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)