”" , ! -HC-78 m §q1$ . z mam (W) metmW am maW95 ‘ m§n $Wa mmm 311%21 g, Writ Pe tition {SI No.6 129/ 2008 (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra, J. 05-1 1—2008:- Shri CIJ.K. Rae, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. ’l‘hakur, Dy. Advocate General for the State. Heard. ‘ V.. moo ‘ mmwm né21 PETITIONER: Smt. Jalpati Bai, wife of Jalad Ram Chouhan, aged about 5O years; residence of village and pOSt Jamargi B, Police Station Baghbahar, Tahsil Baghbahar, District-Jashpur, Chhattisgarh —Versus- RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Home Department, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Superintendent of Police, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 3. Assistant ’ Treasury Officer, Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 1r. Chief Manager . (Regional Manager) Central Bank of India, Branch Patthalgaon, Tahsil Patthalgaon, District Jahspur, Chhattisgarh mm “€123 anést ,Z_ This petition has bee n v J Rs.53,000/— from the bank e of excesS payment towards patitianer. Learned counsel for the be resolved by the High constituted as per directions In View of the above disposed of with a direction this petition along with a General (CG), Within a perio 3 parties submit that this dispute may Power Committee for Retiral Dues, of this Court. submissions, the instant petition is to the petitioner to submit a copy of nnexures in the ohi’ce of Advocate 1 of 10 days from today, who; in turn, shall fo1ward the same to t'he High Power Committee for Retiral Dues and the said Commit further period of four montl this order along with cop} Advoeate General. Sdl— Dhirendra Mishra Judge org mms'wm nwmet > ' mm“ ' mm V @ mam (trams?) n preferred against the recovery of ccount of the petitioner on the pretext pension, Without any notice to the :ee shall decide the dispute within is from the date of receipt of copy of f of the petition from the office of ‘ a