THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO. 636 OF 2008 JUDGMENT : (Per Sri Justice B Prakash Rao) The appellants are managing committee along with other members, who filed this appeal inter-alia aggrieved against the orders of the learned single Judge in W P No. 15368 of 2007 dated 19.7.2007 allowing the writ petition filed at the instance of the first respondent /writ petitioner, where he sought for a mandamus to declare the action of A P Wakf Board for not taking steps in accordance with section 68 and other provisions of the Wakf Act 1995 direct the managing committee to handover the charge and accounts to the writ petitioner and consequential direction to the Chief Executive Officer to take such steps to deliver the records, accounts and all other properties of the institution. The case of the writ petitioner was that he was appointed as Mutavalli to the institution on 22.5.2005 and as such entitled to the entire records, which is not being handed over to him. Hence, the writ petition. In respect of his appointment or appointment of the managing committee, there were two separate writ petitions, which were ultimately disposed of confirming his appointment and setting aside the order of appointment of managing committee dated 18.12.2005. It is to be mentioned that the appeal filed by the managing committee in W A no. 788 of 2007 was heard together and dismissed as per the orders of even date holding that having made an appointment as mutavalli, question of appointing a committee is not valid. The grievance in the writ is only that having regard to the appointment he is entitled to receive the records, accounts etc of the institution in question and considering the same and taking into account the objections of the appellants, the learned single Judge disposed of the said writ petition directing the writ petitioner /first respondent herein to avail the remedy under Section 68 of the Wakf Act. In view of the fact that such a direction is being only consequence to his appointment as mutavalli, and where the order of appointing a managing committee is set aside, there cannot be any serious objection validly in law nor any justification on behalf of the appellants herein to refuse to accept such request or comply with the directions in regard to handing over of the records etc, hence, we do not find any error in the direction given by the learned single Judge. There are no merits in the appeal and accordingly the same is dismissed. No costs. ________________ B.PRAKASH RAO,J ______________ R KANTHA RAO,J DATE:5-08-2009 TVK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO. 636 OF 2008 Date: 5-08-2009