rn^^ INTHEHON>BLEHI6K^UftTOB^^ - ^•.: •:,.;.:' BII.ASPKl&fC.e.l ^ri^:' ,.^ :-,.::';::5:; W.P. fSTNG>. ?^3- RESPONbENTS : <>f-!'-y^ ^" ^crii Ram Shanket' DadseHa, /Vged^boQ^ 6Q;^ar^^|S/^ SadhramSSiaGlsentt^ Lecfur'ier<,,f%-,;6oSi^PFffflei'i'R !i31£li isr SecoridaF^.Scl-iool.^Kbthapi^i'BtocR. KaFtala,Distt;Korbfl(G.©j^?i^ State'of CKhaftisgaF|^l.:;";^?'%^ Thpough5ecretdry^K.'i:^:.^^:. ^ TrtbN^We1f(^e^pat^rnen^s»'^-;^:^ D.K.S.BI^Gin,5Rm|:)Uri{(3.S.);.^ ^:mmi3Sbner::S;,:^£'.^..i.^..'.:'^ TMbal.AWelfarei:l>epi^mentiS^...-J.'^ Rqipur^C.^,V.:^g^^Y:'^^ Assistdnfi6gmrnissi10:rier'^::^^w^;^s:':;: Tribaiwyfar^ Depap^m8nt,f' % Korba,Distt.iKQrba;{iSM)';:l? Joiht51birecTor^Treasur^,aec(^ pen3ion,Korba{C&^y;,':^.':.^.^^^^ :The:'PrinGipl^;!t.;y^fiKK;;:y^,,^ G6Ve rnent^HrgftBJ'^.Si(;onG|ir'^^|i[o8l. |<othari,BloGk KapMa?>^i!s ^i'ltt&^ (C.6.):.,:.'.:--':..;f.f^.£:l:t.;.:.^ WRITPETITIQN^UtslE;>ER^RTIgLK2260F CONSTltOlONOFINDIAA / Ai. @ HJGHCOURT QF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR WRlTPETmONfS) No. 1152 of2011 PETmONER RESPONDENTS Ram Shaaker Dadsena. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. Annt WRIT PETTriON UNDER AR'IICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OFDsEDIA SB: Hon'MeShriSatishK.Asnihotri.J. Present: Shri Basant Kaiwart, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govemment Advocate fortheState/ respondents. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 01st day ofMarcfa, 2011) ; 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw tius petition with liberty to make a representation in fhe light of several decisions passed by the Supreme Court as well as this Court and further, inthe light of circular dated 05.01.2011 (Annexure P/2), passed by the Governmeiit ofChhattisgarh, School Education DepartmeHt. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. No pemrissicin ofthis Court is required to make representation to fhe respondent authorities. Thus, such direction eamiot be issued. However, ifthe petitioner makes a representation to the resppndent authorities, the same may be considered and deeided in aecordance with law, on its own merits and perspective. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is dismissed. : Sd/- . ,, SattehK.AS"ihotFl Judge ^l u I .I; asi ;Tt