HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR J. Misc. Appeal (€)No. 608 of 2010 Appellants Claimants 1 Smt. Kumari Bai Ghiri Wd/o Jate Vishnu Prasad Ghiri, aged 39 years, 2 Tikaram Ghiri S/o late Vishnu Prasad Ghiri, aged21 years, 3 Shrawan Kumar Giri, s/o late Vishnu Prasad Ghiri, aged 18 years, 4 Kuleshwar Prasad S/o late Vishnu Prasad GhirS, aged 15 years, 5 Kumari Jai Prabha Ghiri d/o late Vishnu Prasad Ghiri, aged 10 years, Appellant No. 4 & 5 minor through legal guardian mother Smt. Kumari Bai wd/o late Vishnu Prasad Ghiri, 6 Suklal S/o shri Deonath Ghiri aged about 65 years, 7 Smt. Shisham W/o Suklal, aged about 55 years, All resident of Shirshakala, P.S. Bhilai - 3, District Durg (C.G.) Versus Respondents Guha Das Joshi s/o Bakhariya Joshi, aged about 48 years, R/o Ramnagar Azad Chowk, Supela, P.S. Supela, Bhilai, Tahsil & Distrtet Durg (C.G.) Driver of Munteipal Corporation Bhilai. Driver of alleged Vehicle Tempo No. M.P.-24C/4712 Municipal Corporation Bhilai through : Commissioner Municipal Corporation Bhilai, Supela, Tahsil & District Durg r ~'\ (C.G.) Qwner of alleged Vehicle tempo NO.M.P.-24C/4712. 3. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, through Divisional Manager, 16, R.S.S.S. Market Power House Bhilai Tahsil & District Durg (C.G.) Policy No. 2009/1754/91/24 (Insurer of alleged Vehicle Tempo No. MP-24C/4712) Memorandum of appeal under Section 173 ofthe IVtotor VehictesAct.1988 Present: Shri J.S.P. Chandrasen and Shri Vijay Kumar Sahu, tearned counsel for the appellants. ORDER (28th June. 2010) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, CJ. Shri J.S.P. Chandrasen and Shri Vijay Kumar Sahu, leamed counsel for the appellants seek permission to with^raw the appeal flled by the appellants/ claimants for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Eighth Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Durg, vide award dated 12.03.2010, passed in Claim Case No.33/2009, with the liberty of flllng cros&-objections for enhancement of the compensation in the appeal ofthe insurer/ owner ofthe offending vehicle Tempo. 2. Permission granted. 3. With the above liberty, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Chief Jusdce Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge ^.