1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.111 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.1632 OF 2005 . The Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai : Plaintiffs versus Samrat Shipping Company Pvt. Ltd. : Defendants. Ms.Kaneej Munjee i/by Motiwalla and Co. for the Applicants/Plaintiffs. Ms.N.Somnani i/by Bhatt & Saldanha for the Respondents/Defendants CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J DATED : OCTOBER 03, 2008 P.C. 1. By the above Chamber Summons, the Plaintiffs seek leave to amend the Plaint as per the Schedule annexed to the Chamber Summons. It is the case of the Plaintiffs that in stead of the letter in question being read as 3rd September 1995, the same should be read as 15th December 1995. The Plaintiffs have made an averment to that effect in the Plaint and the reasons, why the amendment is 2 sought for, are mentioned in the Chamber Summons. 2. The above Chamber Summons is opposed on behalf of the Respondents/Defendants. It is contended that there is no justification for the amendment. 3. Considering the reasons cited in the Affidavit in support of the Chamber Summons, in my view, case for grant of amendment is made out. The above Chamber Summons is, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The Plaintiffs are directed to carry out the consequential amendment within four weeks from date and to serve the amended copy of the Plaint on the Defendants within two weeks thereafter. The Chamber Summons is accordingly disposed of. [R.M.SAVANT, J]