HIGH COUKT Of CHjHAmStiARH.-BtfcASPUiK ^ 1.C.C. Bo. 685 of 2006 Aopycan.t: Maanulal, s/o Shri Bnibliusiian Agrawal, aged about 55 years, r/o Baloda, lansii JaaiRir, Distt. Jaaign- Chainpa. VS. Respoadeats: (1) ShriJhadurani, s/o iiotkncwn 'v. 1,^) (3) ^i^ Cl1h—.TT,.-,^7,^ow iS^- i-f i>-?i.i.J.^. <^T i-LC-l.'iA t-tJl t3jLU. Yaaav SSari Cliandnka, s/o dnaduram Vc**^ '^1t7 A l.-i.l-a.t-t. ^' Ail residents ot Baloda, 1 an. & Distt. '•»r»irvir- !3Iiy&u i-fp n\ Apiiiea.rance: Stui Vniay Pandey, counsel tbr the applicant. None tbr the respondents though seived ORAL OKDBR (07.11.20081 Siunil KamaT Sinna, Ji, Heard on M.C.P.No. 1829/2006, wluch is an application tbr condonation ot deiav in Tiiing the i^storation appllcation. On due consideratlon of the subinissions inade by leamed counsel tor the appiicaiit, the delay m tiling the restoration application is hereby condoned. Aiso Jieard on restoration application. Ihe applicant is seeiang restoration ot Civll Kevision N0.198/2000, whicli was dismissed tbr wailt ot prosecution on 30.6.2005. On due consideration of the subinissions ruade by learaed counsel Ibr tfae applicant, i am satisfied that Uie non-representation ofthe appUcant on 30.6.2005 when Cr.No. 198/20UO was cailed for hearing, was on bonatide grounds. Accordingly, M.O.C.No.685/2006 is allowed and Civil Revision No. 198/ 2000 is restored to Its originat nuinber. No order as to costs. \-fW!tJ Sdf- Sunil Kumar Smha Judge