1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 3787/2009. ( Punyashlok Ahilyadeo Shikshan Sanstha -: versus :- Rajesh B. Padole and another ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JANUARY 15, 2010. Heard Shri A.S. Chandurkar, learned counsel for petitioners, learned A.G.P. for respondent no.2 and Shri A.D. Mohgaonkar, learned counsel for respondent no.1. After hearing it has become clear that the School Tribunal has not recorded any finding on the correctness of conclusions reached by the Inquiry Officer. Thus, this Court is not in a position to know whether the School Tribunal has found evidence adduced before the Inquiry Officer sufficient to establish the charges against respondent no.1, as alleged in the enquiry report. Hence, with the consent of the parties, Writ Petition is partly allowed and the operative part of judgment of School Tribunal dated 28.07.2009 in Appeal No.14/2008 is quashed and set aside, only to enable it to record finding on the correctness or otherwise of the conclusions reached by the Inquiry Committee. 2 The School Tribunal to attempt to decide the controversy about the perversity of the findings as early as possible and in any case by 31.07.2010. It is made clear that the order dismissing the appeal is set aside and rest of the findings are kept as it is, and matter is remanded only to enable the School Tribunal to record finding on perversity. This Court has not applied its mind to the question of competency and the other contentions raised by Shri Chandurkar and Shri Mohgaonkar, learned counsel for the parties, at this stage. All those questions are kept open for consideration after the findings of the School Tribunal on perversity. Rule accordingly. No cost. JUDGE Rgd.