1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Revision Application No.194 of 2008 (Abdul Salam s/o Abdul Gaffar v. State of Maharashtra) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri A.J. Bhoot, holding for Shri R.L. Khapre, Advocates for Applicant. Shri K.S. Dhote, APP for State. CORAM : R.C. Chavan, J. DATE : 27th November, 2008 Heard. The learned APP submits that the prosecutor in charge of the case before the Trial Court had opposed the application for recall of witness because the applicant was protracting the trial. By invoking jurisdiction of this Court, the net result is that the trial is prolonged. Therefore, he submits that it may be appropriate to allow the applicant to have witness PW 16 Anilmohan recalled and cross-examine him within a fixed time-frame on the documents, which have been proved by the said witness. In view of this, under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure, the application is entertained and allowed. The order passed by the learned Trial Judge is set aside. The learned Trial Judge shall allow the applicant to cross-examine PW 16, who shall be recalled in the second week of December, 2008, according to the convenience of the 2 prosecution and calendar of the Court, with the understanding that no further adjournment would be granted to the applicant. JUDGE pdl