IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 235 of 2009 Dr. Nakli Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J. (Oral) Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manoj Sah, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. L.P. Naithani, Advocate General Uttarakhand, for respondent no 1. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Advocate for respondents No. 2, 3 and 4. Learned counsel for respondents No. 2, 3 and 4 has informed this Court that the impugned orders dated 22.10.2009 and 23.10.2009 have since been withdrawn and as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for respondents No. 2, 3 and 4 having obtained instructions from respondent no. 4 states that respondent no. 4 shall take no action against the petitioner vindictively. With the aforesaid observations, the instant writ petition is disposed of. (B.C. Kandpal, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 29.12.2009 SP