1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 1820/2008 (Vikram Singh Panwar @ Vikki Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 24/04/2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Deepak Menaria for the petitioner. Mr. S.K.Vyas, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and challan papers. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that deceased Arjun Kumar suffered a single injury on his neck alleged to have been caused by co-accused Karansingh who was said to have been armed with Sword. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, no injury has been caused by the present petitioner to the deceased and similarly situated co-accused Hukam Singh has been granted bail by this Court by order dated 01.10.2007. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the injury by sword on the neck of the deceased alleged to have been caused by co-accused Karansingh, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Vikram Singh Panwar @ Vikki S/o Shri Madan Singh Panwar be released on bail in FIR No. 171/2007 2 P.S. Surajpole, Udaipur, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP