IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.6092 of 2011. Decided on: August 31,2011. Sunder Singh …….Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others …….Respondents. ________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioner: Mr.Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr.J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Justice V.K. Ahuja,J.(oral): The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers: “(i) A writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued directing the respondents to allow the benefit of regular appointment in favour of the petitioner w.e.f. 20-4-1993 i.e. the date of award of J.B.T. Condensed Course Certificate alongwith consequential benefits of increments and seniority. (ii) That the respondents may also be directed to allow and pay honorarium/stipend in favour of the petitioner for the period of training undergone by the petitioner for award of J.B.T. Condensed Course Certificate as allowed to similarly situated persons in the State of Himachal Pradesh.” 2 2. It is alleged in the petition that the petitioner has already filed a representation in the year 2010 to respondent No.2, which has not been disposed of so far. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the said representation of the petitioner within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition and a copy of the representation already made by the petitioner. 3. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly, so also the pending application(s), if any. August 31, 2011 (V.K. Ahuja), (tilak) Judge.