IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11673 of 2010 ABDUL KADIR, S/O Mahmud Alam @ Mahmud R/O Village-Minapur, P.S. Hajipur Town, District-Vaishali.........................................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR.................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 10.05.2010. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case no. C1-16 of 2009 in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 498(A) and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that during the pendency of the bail application before the learned Sessions Judge he went to bring the wife for resuming the conjugal life but she refused to accompany the petitioner and an application to that effect was filed before the learned Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur, which is Annexure-2. The impugned order suggests that the complainant has refuted the claim of the husband that he ever went to bring her back to matrimonial home. The petitioner is still ready to keep the complainant as wife. In such circumstance, let learned C.J.M., Vaishali at 2 Hajipur issue notice to the complainant through her lawyer in the complaint case and fix a date for the appearance of the complainant within a period of four weeks from today and on that date the petitioner will also appear and take the complainant from the court to her matrimonial house. Let petitioner file an affidavit before the learned C.J.M., Vaishali, to the effect that he is ready to abide by the aforesaid terms, the petitioner, Abdul Kadir is directed to be released on bail on his surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 16 of 2009, Trial No. 3135 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)