IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27204 of 2008 DAHAUR SAHANI @ OM PRAKASH SAHNI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 05/08/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. Prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected considering the entire merits of the case. A report was called from the court below which has been received and from which it appears that out of 10 named charge sheet witnesses six have been examined including one none charge sheet witness. Wife of the informant and four non official witnesses are yet to be examined. It appears that the trial is continuing well. Considering the above facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is again rejected. However, considering the period of custody of the petitioner the trial court should take all steps for early conclusion of the trial. avin. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)