IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO.212 OF 2008 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.645 OF 1988 Aakash Vishalraj K. Rao ..... Applicant V/s. The Official Liquidator of Elmot Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.K.G.Munshi a/w Vaibhav Warerkar i/by M/s.Govind Desai Associates, for the applicants. Snehal Shah, Sr.Advocate with S.K.Chaturvedi and Mr.Zariwala i/by Chaturvedi & Associates, for Intervener. Mrs.U.M.Jhaveri, for the respondents. CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 13TH MARCH, 2009. P.C. 1. The applicant seeks an order recalling/revoking and or setting aside the order dated 22-03-1990 ordering the winding up of the company. Mr.Munshi, the learned Advocate appearing for the applicant, states that in view of the leave granted by this Court under Section 446 in Company Application No.222 of 2009, this application ought to be adjourned by six weeks. This is on the basis that any orders that may be passed in the proposed suit in respect of the balance 50% shares in liquidation would be relevant to this application. I see no reason to adjourn this application on that basis. If any orders are passed in the proposed suit, 2 which would entitled the applicant to any reliefs or even otherwise, the applicant is at liberty to file a fresh company application on that basis as well as on the basis set out in the above company application itself. In other words, the dismissal of the company application will not affect or prejudice the applicant's rights in any manner. The company application accordingly stands dismissed.