: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4958 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.4958 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.4958 OF 2006 Shri Navnath Vithal Kamble ...Petitioner. Shri Navnath Vithal Kamble ...Petitioner. Shri Navnath Vithal Kamble ...Petitioner. V/s. V/s. V/s. The Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents. The Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents. The Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.K.K.Waghmare for the Petitioner. Mr.K.K.Waghmare for the Petitioner. Mr.K.K.Waghmare for the Petitioner. Mr.B.A.Desai, Sr.Counsel with Mr.A.H.Gokhale for the Mr.B.A.Desai, Sr.Counsel with Mr.A.H.Gokhale for the Mr.B.A.Desai, Sr.Counsel with Mr.A.H.Gokhale for the Respondent Nos.1,4 and 5. Respondent Nos.1,4 and 5. Respondent Nos.1,4 and 5. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos.6 and 9. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos.6 and 9. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos.6 and 9. Mr.Sachin B.Shetye for the respondent no.7. Mr.Sachin B.Shetye for the respondent no.7. Mr.Sachin B.Shetye for the respondent no.7. Mr.R.G.Ketkar for the respondent no.8. Mr.R.G.Ketkar for the respondent no.8. Mr.R.G.Ketkar for the respondent no.8. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & J.H.BHATIA, JJ. J.H.BHATIA, JJ. J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 20th November, 2006. DATE : 20th November, 2006. DATE : 20th November, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. We have heard Mr.Waghmare, the learned counsel for 1. We have heard Mr.Waghmare, the learned counsel for 1. We have heard Mr.Waghmare, the learned counsel for the petitioner and we have also perused the petitioner’s the petitioner and we have also perused the petitioner’s the petitioner and we have also perused the petitioner’s representation dated 16-3-06 addressed to the representation dated 16-3-06 addressed to the representation dated 16-3-06 addressed to the Commissioner of Pune Municipal Corporation. In the said Commissioner of Pune Municipal Corporation. In the said Commissioner of Pune Municipal Corporation. In the said representation, petitioner’s grievance was restricted to representation, petitioner’s grievance was restricted to representation, petitioner’s grievance was restricted to the bifurcation of Bhim Nagar locality in the Hadapsar the bifurcation of Bhim Nagar locality in the Hadapsar the bifurcation of Bhim Nagar locality in the Hadapsar area. It appears that earlier, the said locality was area. It appears that earlier, the said locality was area. It appears that earlier, the said locality was part of the Magarpatta for the corporation election. part of the Magarpatta for the corporation election. part of the Magarpatta for the corporation election. However, on the re-organisation of the corporation However, on the re-organisation of the corporation However, on the re-organisation of the corporation areas, the said Bhim Nagar locality has been divided and areas, the said Bhim Nagar locality has been divided and areas, the said Bhim Nagar locality has been divided and attached to two wards, i.e., Ward No.42 Magarpatta and attached to two wards, i.e., Ward No.42 Magarpatta and attached to two wards, i.e., Ward No.42 Magarpatta and ward no.44 Saint Patricks Town. As against this, the ward no.44 Saint Patricks Town. As against this, the ward no.44 Saint Patricks Town. As against this, the grievance raised by the petitioner’s prayers as set out grievance raised by the petitioner’s prayers as set out grievance raised by the petitioner’s prayers as set out in this writ petition have no connection and the in this writ petition have no connection and the in this writ petition have no connection and the : 2 : petition with such reliefs prayed for can not be petition with such reliefs prayed for can not be petition with such reliefs prayed for can not be entertained. entertained. entertained. 2. The petition is, therefore, disposed off as 2. The petition is, therefore, disposed off as 2. The petition is, therefore, disposed off as withdrawn with liberty to take appropriate steps as may withdrawn with liberty to take appropriate steps as may withdrawn with liberty to take appropriate steps as may be permissible in law in respect of the grievance set be permissible in law in respect of the grievance set be permissible in law in respect of the grievance set out in the representation dated 16-3-2006. out in the representation dated 16-3-2006. out in the representation dated 16-3-2006. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)