IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31827 of 2010 PRAMOD YADAV @ PRAMOD KUMAR YADAV, SON OF RAM HIRDAY RAI. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 386 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that there is enough circumstantial evidence to connect the petitioner with the demand of extortion from the Informant, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it positively within a period of one year in view of the seriousness of the nature of the offence. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)