1 D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL NO. 844/2006 Smt. Narendra Kumari Vs. Board of Revenue and ors. Date of Order :: 3.12.2007 HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. RAJESH BALIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHANWAROO KHAN Mr. J.L. Purohit, for the appellant. Mr. H.S. Sidhu, for the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The appellant claims to be successor in the interest of land originally part of the land sold by Late Shri Devi Singh, erstwhile Jagirdar of Aasop who claimed to be the successor of the land which vested in the State Government as a result of Ceiling proceedings in the case of late Shri Vijendra Singh S/o Late Shri Devi Singh. The appellant claimed the land which vested in the Ceiling proceedings in the State being Khasara No.2393 not given to anyone which fall in the petitioner's share in the partition. It is further stated that the revenue suit for resolution of appellant's claim is already pending at her stand. This litigation is only in respect of mutation entry 2 on record which though carry the presumption of correctness under the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956. Presumption is always subject to finding recorded in the properly instituted suit for declaration of title. In view of this position, we are of the opinion that the invocation of writ jurisdiction by the appellant was not appropriate remedy and entries made in the land records will be subject to out-come of the suit filed by her. Thus, without prejudice to the petitioner's contentions and out-come of the suit, the present appeal is dismissed. However, the mutation entries existing on the date shall be subject to the out-come of the suit filed by the appellant. [BHANWAROO KHAN],J. [RAJESH BALIA],ACTG.CJ. RM/