^•^^u^^w^w^.i C^'}e^1 /" •StNia-E BENCH IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARHl W.P.(ClNo. Of 2010 PETITIONER Bhagwan Das Panjwani, aged about 40 years, S/o. late Shri Balchand Panjwani, R/o. Tilda Camp (Old) Tahsil Tilda, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Versus RESPONDENTS ^l) Union of India, through the secretary, Ministry of Labour and Rehabilitation (Department of Rehabilitation) NewDelhi _'N^ /^c^ n.-si< -^^.•<^'\)''' ^^^y ~/^'y ^ c^ .^yy^ <--° ^ ^'..^ ^ ^2) State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Rehabilitation Department Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, GE Road, Raipur (C.G.) -:3) Collector (Nazul Branch) Nazul, Collectorate Building G.E.Road, Raipur (C.G.) ./:4) Naib Tahsildar, Tilda (Neora), Tahsil Tilda, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HiGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITiON (Q No. 6188 of 2010 PETITiONER : Bhagwan Das Panjwani VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Union of tndia & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. J. Present: Shri H.BAgrawa!, SeniorAdvocate with Ms. Pragya Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Fouzia Mirza/Assistant Solicitor General forthe Union of India/ respondent No.1. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate forthe State/respondent No.2to4. ORDERfORAU (Passed on 27th day of October, 2010) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by inaction on the part of the Nazul Officer, wherein it was observed that under the scheme, pursuant to the direction of the State Government, rehabilitation of the dispiaced persons from West Pakistan, was to be done within a period of three months in Tilda Camp. Thereafter, no action has been taken till date. The petitioner has further made a representation to the Coliector on 11.03.2010 (Annexure P/2) seeking a direction to the Nazut Officer, to do the needful as early as possible. 2. Be that as it may, this is a dispute which arises from the prder passed by the Nazui Officer i.e. a Revenue Officer. Against that, the petitioner has statutory forum availabie i.e. the Collector, may be Commissioner orthe Board of Revenue. The petitioner, without ::<'\ ', • L i ^.ssS^, 1 ^i^y:^. I ^ \, 2 approaching to other authorifies as provided in statutory hierarchy, has approached this Court to invoke extraordjnary writ Jurisdiction ofthjs Court underArticie 226 ofthe Constitution of India. There is RS r^Fao'rcli'niry slrsum@tQnoe§ necessltattno ©nTertainmentsf this petition. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed at the motion stage jtself. However, it is expected that the Coltector shall look into the grievance ofthe petitioner and pass appropriate orders, as eariy as possibte in accordance with iaw. ,1 Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ashok