IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10675 of 2011 SANJIV KUMAR PANDIT @ SANJIV KUMAR SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 22.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sahkund P.S. Case No. 112/99 pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur registered under Sections 419, 420, 386 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. It is alleged against the petitioner and others to have taken Rs. 16,500/- from the informant on promise to return the double amount. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was actually not named with correct address and parentage and after one year of the lodging of the case, the petitioner has actually been named with his correct address and parentage. This Court is not inclined to interfere only on the ground that the case was instituted in the year 1999. 2 Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner considering all the contentions of the petitioner. With the above observation, this application is, accordingly, disposed off. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)