HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR E SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. SHRI DHiRENDRA MISHRA, J. REViEWPETiTiON No.78 of 2007 Smt. Dropati Sahu, W/o Shri Puhup Ram Sahu, aged about 31 years, R/o DNK Colony Kondagaon, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) 2. 3. 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through-The Secretary, Panchayat & Sociai Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) The Chtef Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Jagdalpur The Chief Executive Offlcer, Janpad Panchayat, Kondagaon, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) Bhagwati Markam, W/o Ramesh Kumar Markam, aged about 32 years, Caste Gond, R/o Village Bhoitola, P.0. Kodawagodan, Block & Tahsil Pandariya, District Kabeerdham (C.G.) ApBlication for modification and review of the order dated 22.06.2006 Shri SC Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri MPS Bhatia, Deputy Government Advocate for respondent No.l/State. (21st February, 2008$ The following order of She Court was passed by Learned counsel for the parties are heard. (2) Applicant Bhagwati Markam is seeking review of order dated 22nd June, 2006 passed in W.P. No.2119/2006 and other connected writ petitions whereby the writ petitions were dismissed. (3) it appears that in consequence of dismissa! of those writ petitions vide order dated 22-6-2006 applicant Bhagwati Markam was served with a notice to show cause as to why her services be not terminated in view of the order dated 22-6-2006 passed in those writ petitions. Applicant Bhagwati Markam challenged the said notice by filing a writ petition which came to be registered as W.P.(S) No.2396/2006. On 18/4/2007, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing in the said writ petition sought permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a review petition for review of the order dated 22-6-2006 passed in W.P. No.2119/2006 and other connected matters. It is in this background that appllcant Bhagwati Markam has filed this review petitlon for review of order dated 22-6-2006. (4) Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, learned Deputy G.A. has raised a preiimlnary objectlon about the maintainability of the review petition itself on the ground that app!icant Bhagwati Markam cannot be permitted to seek review ofthe order dated 22-6-2006 on the facts of her case. (5) Shri S.C. Verma, learned counsel for the applicant faced with the above situation, seeks permission to withdraw the review petition with the iiberty of filing another writ petition challenging the notice (Anneuxre-A/2) received by applicant Bhagwati Markam to show cause as to why her services be not terminated in view of the order dated 22-6-2006 passed in W.P. No.2119/2006 and other connected writ petitions. ^ (6) Permission granted. <; (7) With the above liberty, review petition is dismissed as withdrawn. -———— - Sd/- Chief Justice Padma Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge