IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN THURSDAY, THE 21ST JUNE 2007 / 31ST JYAISHTA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 126 of 2007(S) AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WA.1885/2005 Dated 19/10/2005 PETITIONERS: PETITIONERS 2 AND 9: 1. SUNDURAJAN. P., AGED 33, S/O.SANKARANKUTTY, PEEDIYODE KALAM, VAAZHAYAMPURAM P.O., KARAKURUSSI, MANNARKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. INDU. R., AGED 37, D/O.REGHUPATHY, INDUVILLA, SHORANUR-2, SHORANNUR, KRURUTTIKUNNU, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.K.MARTHANDAN UNNITHAN SRI.V.JAYAKUMAR RESPONDENTS: 1. SIVAJA DAS, AGED 42 YEARS, SECRETARY, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. RAVEENDRANATHAN NAIR, AGED 50 YEARS, DISTRICT OFFICER, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, DISTRICT OFFICE, KESAVADASAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. JOLY MATHEW, AGED 54, DIRECTOR OF PRINTING OFFICE OF THE DIRECTORATE OF PRINTING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.R.SABU THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.T.SANKARAN,J. ---------------------------------------------------- CONT. CASE (CIVIL) NO. 126 OF 2007 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st June, 2007 JUDGMENT H.L.DATTU, C.J. Petitioners complain that the respondents in the petition have disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this Court and, therefore, they request us to initiate contempt proceedings as envisaged under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Court Act. 2. When the matter was posted before Court, we specifically requested the learned counsel appearing for the complainant to inform us the order which, according to the petitioners, has been disobeyed by the respondents. We are sorry to say that the learned counsel was not in a position to point out any order which, according to the petitioners, has been disobeyed by the respondents. In view of that, we cannot take cognizance of the contempt petition. Accordingly, the contempt petition requires to be rejected and it is rejected. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) Chief Justice (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/