r'. In the Honble Hiah Court OfJudicature of Ghhattisearhat Bilaspur C.G. ^^ WPNo. ^-%9/2005 ^y^ ^- Petitioner ..........................<^.....Somlal aged 49years son ofSadaram. Shraniik,Shramilt,worldngunder Sub DivisionalOfficer(B&R),Sub Division no.Balod, Tahsil Balod District Dui^(C.G.) i.'i E; Versus Respondent ........................ l.The State Government ofChhattishgarh Through the Secretary, P.W.D., Ministry. D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Sub Diyisional OfBcer, Sub Division No.2,P.W.D.BalodTahsUBalodDistt. Durg(C.G.) Writ petitionjmder article& 226/227 ofthe constitutibn of India. Bp; g 1 KW ^ PETITIONER HIGH COURTOFCHHATnSGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 239 OF 2005 Somlal RESPONDENTS Versus The State Government of Chhattisgarh & another l"i' Gowri (Writ Petitionunder Article 226/227 of the Constitution oflndia) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Deputy GovernmentAdvocate, for the State. ORDER(ORAU (Passedon this1stdayofApril, 2010) 1. At the very outset, leamed cbunsel appearihg for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Gangman in the respondent clepartment and he was retired from the service on attaining the age of 49 years irtsteaa of 62 years. Learned counsel further submits that the issue involved in the case on hand is squarety covered by the decision of this CQUrt renderedin Govirid & others V. State ofC.G. &others , thusthe present petition may be disposed of in the same terms. 2. Shri Bhatja, leamed counset appearing for the State submits that since the faets of the case are notstated in the present petition, it is not possible to come to an agreement at this stage, however, if the petitioner makes a detailed representation, the same shall be considered and decided, on verification of facts andin accordance with the decision of this court rendered in Govind (supra), as early as possible preferably within a periodof 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a representation from the petitioner. 3. In viewofforegoing, accordingtothetearned cpunselforthepetitioner nothing sun/ives in this petition for adjudicafion. • 4. Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of with the aforestated liberty to the petitioner, if so advised. J',':,.:. Sd/-. .; . SadshK.Agiuhotri ~1 Judge ./-' ".-- /"' . ^> / 1 2007 (2)C.G.L.J. 29 ^gs 'S:e!sSS'f-7s.s\ '^itW:'KS-!t?.SfSS''S ?!%?..' i?:'F*3—ST~SS3a-