-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3126 OF 2011. Satyawati Shridhar Panchal & Anr. ..Petitioners. Versus The Divisional Commissioner, Kokan Division and Others. ..Respondents. Mr. Rakesh Agrawal i/b Mr. A. N. Giri for the petitioners. Ms. Savita S. Banger i/b Anil R. Mishra for R-4. Mr. S. G. Surana for R-5. Ms. P.S.Cardozo, AGP for R-1 to 3. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : April 20, 2011. P. C. : 1. Not on board. Mentioned for production stating urgency. In view of the urgency, production was granted. 2. The petitioners have already been directed to be evicted from the structure in question which is situated on the land belonging to respondent no.5 owner/developer. The petitioners’ appeal is also disallowed. 3. Mr. S. G. Surana, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.5, after taking instructions from the Partner of respondent no.5 firm, who is present in Court, makes a statement that petitioner no.1 is eligible for the permanent alternate accommodation, however, the eligibility of petitioner no.2 is srp -: 2 :- pending for consideration before the appellate authority, namely, SRA. He further states that so far as petitioner no.1 is concerned, the temporary alternate accommodation will be given to him in a transit camp constructed on CTS No. 89B and he will not evicted from this transit camp accommodation till he is given permanent alternate accommodation. So far as petitioner no.2 is concerned, he makes a statement that respondent no.5 will offer transit accommodation to him in the aforesaid transit camp for the period of 6 months from today and in case petitioner no.2 is found to be eligible by the appellate authority, his transit accommodation will be continued till he gets permanent alternate accommodation. Statement is accepted. In view of the aforesaid statements, the grievance of the petitioner no more survives. Hence, petition is disposed of. 4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellate authority, namely, the SRA, is directed to dispose of petitioner no.2’s appeal as expeditiously as possible and preferably within the period of four months from today. (RANJIT MORE, J.)