IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14027 of 2011 1. BARUN PANDIT 2. RUKMANI DEVI 3. BULESHWAR PANDIT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 22.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner no.3, Buleshwar Pandit being the father of the husband has already been arrested, hence his application for anticipatory bail has become infructuous. So far as petitioner nos. 1 and 2 being the younger brother and the mother of the husband are concerned, there is general accusation against them. The marriage was performed three years prior to the occurrence. The accusation is of demand of motorcycle and Rs. 50,000/- and for non-fulfillment of the same, the victim was killed. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the 2 petitioners that this fact was verified by the I.O. that on death of victim due to illness, the informant was informed but he chose not the visit the victim's in-laws house when the dead body was disposed off and subsequently, with frivolous allegation, the present case has been lodged. Considering the fact that the accusation is general in nature against the entire family members and the thrust of accusation is against the husband, let the above named petitioner nos. 1 and 2, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Antichak P.S. Case No. 16/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)