Chandka 1 CHS-502-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 502 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 847 OF 2010 Shandar Kamal Amrohi ..Plaintiff versus Mahal Pictures Private Limited & Ors. ..Defendants And Tabeer-E-Zehra Amrohi & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. Sanjay Jain with Mr. Nishant Sasidharan and Mr. Darshan Mehta and Mr. Lalan Gupta i/b. Dhruve Liladhar & Co. for Plaintiff in support. Mr. Raj Mehta i/b. RKM Legal Services for Defendant No. 2. Ms. Ratna Bhargavan i/b. R B & Associates for Defendant Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM : DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 14 March 2011. P.C. : The Chamber Summons seeks the impleadment of Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 as Defendants 7 and 8 in view of the subsequent transfers which have taken place. Having perused the nature of the amendment, I am of the view that there is no reason or justification to disallow the Chamber Summons which is for amending the Plaint. The Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Liberty to the Plaintiff to move afresh in Chandka 2 CHS-502-10 respect of prayer clause (b). The Chamber summons is accordingly disposed of. Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. (Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud, J.)