1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1658 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL (St.) NO. 26489 OF 2005 Vaishalyadevi Shantilal Shah ........Applicant versus Padmaja Shantilal Shah & anr........ Respondents. Mr. Manoj Patil h/f A.B. Vagyani adv. for the Applicants. CORAM: RANJIT V. MORE, J. DATED : 05th DECEMBER,2008. P.C.: 1. Heard. Mr. Manoj Patil learned counsel for the appellant tenders affidavit of service showing that both the respondents are served. However none appears on their behalf. The Civil application is taken out for condonation of delay of 360 days. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned. Civil Application is disposed of. (R. V. More, J.) 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1659 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL (St.) NO. 26489 OF 2005 Vaishalyadevi Shantilal Shah ........Applicant versus Padmaja Shantilal Shah & anr........ Respondents. Mr. Manoj Patil h/f A.B. Vagyani adv. for the Applicants. CORAM: RANJIT V. MORE, J. DATED : 05th DECEMBER,2008. P.C.: 1. Heard. Mr. Manoj Patil learned counsel for the applicant. He tenders affidavit of service in C.A.No. 1658/08, pointing out that the respondents are served in this C.A. However none appears for the respondent. The Civil application is taken out for restoration of Second Appeal (St.) No. 26489/05. This second appeal was dismissed for non removal of the objections. The learned counsel makes a statement that some of the objections have already been removed and remaining objections will be removed within a period of two weeks from today. In view of the statement and for the reasons stated in the Civil Application, S.A.St. No. 26489/05 is restored to file. Civil Application is therefore allowed and disposed of. (R.V. More, J.)