IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1824 of 2011 Prabodh Jha . Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors . ----------- For the petitioner:- Mr. Birmani Kumar, Adv. For the State:- Mr. Satyabir Bharti, Adv. ------------- 4. 19.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite parties. It is not in controversy between the parties that the order in fact stands complied by reinstatement on the post from which he was reverted and arrears paid also as mentioned in the show cause on behalf of the opposite party nos. 2 and 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner however submits that the payments have not been made in the correct scale. The show cause states that a sum of Rs. 7,50,646/- has been paid to the petitioner towards arrears from 3.6.2005 to 6.5.2011. The amount is sufficiently large to satisfy the Court of a substantial compliance. Any further controversy with regard to the scale, when there were no specific orders with regard to the same in the writ petition, may be pursued by the petitioner by filing an appropriate representation which is expected to be considered appropriately in accordance with law expeditiously. 2 Needless to state that if the opposite parties find justification in the claim or in any part of the claim they shall act reasonably and prudently by issuance of necessary consequential orders without awaiting fresh litigation. The application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)