IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.3641 of 2006 Between: 1 Smt.B.Girija, W/o.G.B.Baradwaj, R/o.Flat No.304, H.No.2-2-1166/A, 3rd Floor, Kortla Place, Tilak Nagar, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. 2 M/s.Rohit Enterprises, Rep by its Proprietor, Sri G.Siva Kumar, S/o.G.B. Baradwaj, 22-1105/9/B, Tilak Nagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The State of A.P., Rep by its Principal Secretary, Agricultural and Cooperative Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Prudential Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd., R.P.Road, Secunderabad. 3 The Sale Officer, Prudential Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd, R.P. Road, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ order or direction particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents Bank in auctioning the House Property Flat No.304, IIIrd Floor, in Premises No.2-2-1166/A, Kortala Apartments, Tilaknagar Nallakunta, Hyderabad on 27-2-2006 pursuant to the impugned Sale Notice as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to law, unconstitutional and also in Violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300 (A) of the Constitution of India and in violation of principles of natural justice, consequently stay the auction Sale dated 27-2-2006 issued in E.P.No.2/2003 under Rule 52 (ii) (e) of A.P.Cooperative Societies Act and pass such other order or orders as deemed fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.P.V.V.SATYANARAYANA Counsel for Respondent No.1: GP FOR COOPERATION Counsel for Respondents 2 & 3: MR. S. ASHOK ANAND KUMAR The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.3641 OF 2006 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 5th February, 2009. IBL