IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CM No.24962-CII-2008 and FAO No.4880 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION: 23.04.2010 **** Babli Devi and others . . . . Appellants VS. Sanjeev Kumar and others . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN **** Present: - Mr.Robin Dutt, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Neeraj Khanna, Advocate for respondent No.3 **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J. (ORAL) This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 278 days in filing of the appeal. Notice in the application was issued but no reply has been filed. In the application, applicant has not mentioned any sufficient cause for the condonation of delay. Moreover, after going through the main case, it is found that the compensation awarded is in accordance with law. Therefore, I do not find any justification to condone the delay of 278 days in filing the appeal. Hence, the present application is dismissed. Consequently, the appeal is also dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 23.4.2010 JUDGE Vivek