... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3053 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.3053 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.3053 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri Niranjan Mundargi i/by Shri Ganesh Gole for the Applicant. Shri Rajesh More, A.P.P. for the State. Shri M.V.Kini for the Respondent No.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : SEPTEMBER 11, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 11, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 11, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The Advocate appearing for the Applicant has tendered on record affidavit of the Applicant alongwith consent terms signed by the Applicant and the second Respondent. The affidavit of the second Respondent is also taken on record to which same consent terms are annexed. 2. The learned Advocate appearing for the Applicant states that in view of settlement which is reflected in the consent terms annexed to the affidavits of the parties, he does not press this Application. ... 2 ... 3. Hence, in view of the settlement, Application is dismissed as not pressed. Consequently, ad-interim relief granted earlier stands vacated. . Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE