IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP-T No. 3039/2008 Decided on:18.8.2010 _____________________________________________ Uttam Chand. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with P.M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. ____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Mr. Jeevesh Sharma prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition in order to enable his client to make a representation to the competent authority for the redressal of his grievance. Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the competent authority within a period of four weeks from today. Thereafter the competent authority shall decide the same by a speaking order within a period of three months after the receipt of the representation. It will be open to the petitioner to rake up all the issues, which have been taken up in the present petition, at the time of filing the representation. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 18.8.2010 *awasthi* 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No