1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3048/2009 Suresh Kumar Songara Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Date of Order :: 13.04.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr S.N. Trivedi, for the petitioner/s. ... Under an order dated 3.5.1978 an appointment was given to the petitioner as Male Nurse Gr.III purely on adhoc basis for a period of six months. During the term of appointment the petitioner proceeded on leave, and therefore, did not choose to report on duties for a petty long time. Ultimately, the respondents under order dated 3.3.1989 granted a fresh appointment to the petitioner. By submitting various representations the petitioner claimed to treat him in service of the respondents from the date adhoc appointment was accorded to him i.e. 3.5.1978. The claim of the petitioner stood rejected by the Joint Director (Nursing), Medical and Health Services, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur on 29.11.2007. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents should have treated services of the petitioner from 3.5.1978 by declaring the period, in which he remained absent, as dias non. I do not find any merit in the argument advanced. It is the position admitted that the petitioner was purely on adhoc basis, and 2 therefore, no benefit for which a regular employee is entitled could have been extended to him. In view of it, I do not find any error in decision of the respondents by rejecting the petitioner's claim. The petition for writ is dismissed accordingly. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal '