IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35613 of 2009 1. MD. NAUSHAD S/O NOOR MOHAMMAD,R/O KESOJHARA, P.S.PAHARKATTA,DIST.- KISHANGANJ. 2. RAMI HEMBRAM @ RAMU HEMBRAM S/O JETO HEMBRUM,R/O KHARKHARI, P.S.- PAHARKATTA, DIST.-KISHANGANJ. 3. MD. KURBAN @ MD. QURBAN S/O DIL MOHAMMAD,R/O LODHABARI, P.S.- PAHARKATTA, DIST-KISHANGANJ....................................................................Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ................................................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 02. 27.11.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case under Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act. Petitioners are alleged to have been identified while they were cutting trees in the forest. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in fact the allegations that they were cutting trees is drawn from the First Information Report wherein it is stated that a stack of the wood was lying in the forest which indicates that the trees had been freshly cut. This may be a good ground for grant of regular bail but I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioners is rejected. If the petitioners surrender in the court below and pray for regular bail, their bail application may be considered and disposed of within a week without being prejudiced by the present. 2 Counsel for the petitioners is permitted to deposit the cost of fax to communicate this order to the S.D.J.M., Kishanganj in connection with C.C. No. 11/2004. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)