$E§§§LE QEMQH‘ C “JR? ‘ ( a) ‘ (a: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION No. g V g l ‘/2oos Raj Kuma Singh, S/o. Shri Neelkarfth Singh, Agd about 59 years, Retd‘ Secretary, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Kawardha, R/o. Bahadra Ward, Near New Bus Stand, Bhatapara, District Raipur (CG). State of Chattisgarh, hrough its Secretary, Deeartment of Agriculture, Mantrala, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C..} h T ya G Chhattisgarh Rajya Krishi Vipanan Bord, Purani Ganj Mandi Parisar, Raipur (C.G} Through ts Managing Director i Deputy Dirctor, Chhattisgarh Rajya Krishi Vipan'an Board, Raipur (C.G.) 27 OF THE WRIT IN THE FOR OTHER RS, DIRECTION PETITIONER r e lb a e / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(2 CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI AND SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, ORDER OR ORDE OR DIRECTIONS. IGH COURT OF CHHATT!SGARH AT BILASPU RIT PETITION NO 3461 of 2005 r' \ Pner { tate of Chattisgar & Oter S hh hs wspondents WRIT TTIO PEIN UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB Hon'ble Mr Satish K Agnlhotrl J ) Present :- Shn‘ Harsh Wardhan, Advocate far the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri. Pane! Lawyen‘or the State/respondent No.1“ Shri Lokesh Singh, Advocate for the respondent No.2 & 3. é~ ORDER ORAL u appearing for th i ugned order date hhattisgarh Rajya ‘rn rtunity of hearing, h t t /5), which was r ui at the same may r rdance with law: ‘ i e ade pointing out al the Iegal and other objecions, the same shall be d l t considered an deided in accordance with Iaw. c u ioner sumits ha rtt r sentation and the i s the same withi respondents may be drected to conider and decide n stipuated peiod. r li petitioner within a s and decided) in accordance with law within a period of six seeks from the date of receipt of the application. Conequently, the writ petition is allowd to the above t hi s e exten, quasng the impugned order dated 28/06/2005. Ra r h ersus l r In¢view of foegoing, ifithe appcation is made by the period of two week, the same shall be considered l Sd- Satish K. Agnihotri H R W R etih'o } Kuma Smg V (easedon 12 Day ofJuIy, 2619) Atthe very otset, Shri Lokesh Singh, learned gounsel e respondent No. 2 & 3 submits that admttedly the imp d 28/06/2005 was passed by the Managing Director, C Krishi Vipanan Board, Raipur withoutaffodig an oppo quasing he order daed 14/01l2002 (Annexure P granted in favour of the petitioner. He futher sbmts th be quashed and proper oder will be passed in acco Shri Singh further submts that if a rpresentation is m i At this jncture, learned counsel appearing for the petit b tt the petitioner may be pemied to make a fesh repre