1 Cri.A.3888.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3888 OF 2011 [Suryaprakssh S/o Tekchandji Dembda Vs. The State of Maharashtra] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.R.N.Dhorde,Advocate for Applicant Shri.K.S.Patil,APP for Respondent-State. .... CORAM: R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 8TH NOVEMBER,2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned APP. 2. The applicant apprehends his arrest in connection with the Crime No.I-67 of 2011 registered with Badanapur Police Station, District Jalna under the various Sections. It is noted that anticipatory bail application of the applicant was rejected by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna and the application for anticipatory bail was filed before this Court was lateron withdrawn by the 2 Cri.A.3888.11 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders applicant. Thereafter, the present application is filed on 05.09.2011. As on today there no interim protection. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant/accused submitted that as on today the police has not arrested the applicant and the other co accused has been released on the bail. If this is the factual position that is to say if the applicant is not arrested for substantial long time then ground put by the applicant that he is likely to be arrested in connection with aforesaid crime in future, is not accepted. In my view, in this peculiar facts of the case, the applicant has failed to make out prima facie case that he apprehends arrest, thus applicant cannot be granted anticipatory bail. Hence, the following order. . Application stands rejected. Sd/- [ R.Y.GANOO, J.] MTK 3 Cri.A.3888.11 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders