IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2526.2007 IN ITXA (L) NO.1293/2007 (The CIT Mumbai V/s.M/s.Polyolefins Industries Ltd.) ____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memo- ¦ -randa of Coram, Apperances¦ Court’s or Judges Orders Courts orders or directions¦ and Prothonotary’s orders ¦ -------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & SANTOSH BORA, JJ. SANTOSH BORA, JJ. SANTOSH BORA, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 23rd April, 2008 23rd April, 2008 23rd April, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard Mr.A.D.Kango for the Appellant and Ms.V.B.Patel for the Respondent. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 257 days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. It appears that though the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax had granted approval for filing an Appeal on 26.9.2006, the Appeal came to be filed belatedly on 13.6.2007. The reasons given for delay that of getting the draft memo of Appeal prepared, administrative difficulties & shortage of Court fee stamps etc. does not appear to be justifiable. No sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Hence, Notice of Motion stands dismissed. 2. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion, Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1293/2007 also stands dismissed. (SANTOSH BORA J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (SANTOSH BORA J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (SANTOSH BORA J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)