1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2014 OF 2007 Smt. Nilima wd/o Anil Mishra ...... Petitioner. V/s The Union of India and others. ....... Respondents. ------- Mr. A.P. Wachasundar i/b L.J. Law for the Petitioner. Mr. P.J. Thorat alongwith Mr. Luckyraj Indorkar i/b M/s. Hariani & Co. for respondent Nos. 2 to 4. ------ CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND V.M.KANADE, J. DATE : 1ST JULY, 2008. P.C.: 1. After some arguments, the learned Counsel appearing for the parties, upon instructions from their respective clients, jointly prayed that this Writ Petition could be disposed of by consented order. The agreed terms are :- (a) The petitioner herein will be entitled to file an appeal in accordance with Rule 54 of the relevant Rules within two weeks from today. 2 (b) The competent appellate authority shall decide the said appeal after hearing the petitioner or her representative within four weeks thereafter. (c) For a period of six weeks from today, the departmental inquiry shall not proceed any further. (d) After completion of the said period, the departmental inquiry shall commence if so directed by the appellate authority in accordance with law and will be completed within three months thereafter. The petitioner herein, in that event, shall fully co-operate in the progress of the departmental inquiry and will not ask for any unnecessary adjournments. (e) The petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the order of the appellate authority as well as the order in departmental proceedings in accordance with law. (f) The order passed upon conclusion of the departmental inquiry, if adverse to the interest of the petitioner, will not be given effect to for a period of two weeks. 3 2. The above terms are just, fair and proper. We pass the order in terms of the agreement between the parties. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE V.M. KANADE, J.