:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2023 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2023 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2023 OF 2006 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.9080 OF 2006 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.9080 OF 2006 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.9080 OF 2006 Shri.Mahalaxmi Sah.Grahtaran Sanstha Maryadit .. Appellant. Versus 1. Ramakant Vasantrao Tavade & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.P.S.Dani for appellant. Mr.N.V.Bandivadekar for respondents. CORAM : SMT. R.S. DALVI, J. CORAM : SMT. R.S. DALVI, J. CORAM : SMT. R.S. DALVI, J. DATE : 25th June, 2007. DATE : 25th June, 2007. DATE : 25th June, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. . This appeal challenges the judgement and decree passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kolhapur dated 23.01.2006. This appeal has been filed on 12.04.2006. Notice to the respondents upon caveat has been issued on 27.04.2007. In the meantime, the respondents have created third party rights under registered, but insufficiently stamped development agreement. The revenue records have been accordingly changed. Therefore, there can be no relief for :2: stay or for injunction of the impugned judgement and decree restraining the respondents from transferring or creating third party rights in respect of the suit property. . Civil Application is grossly belated and hence rejected. (Smt.R.S. DALVI, J.) (Smt.R.S. DALVI, J.) (Smt.R.S. DALVI, J.)