..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3422 OF 2008 Arun Bhagawan Unhale. ..Applicant. Versus State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .... Mr.P.R.Arjunwadkar, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.Y.M.Nakhwa, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 10th December, 2008. DATED : 10th December, 2008. DATED : 10th December, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant - orig.accused and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is facing prosecution in R.C.C. No.712 of 2008 which is pending before the learned J.M.F.C. Court No.1, Solapur. The said case pertains to C.R.No.9 of 2006 of Vijapur Naka police station. By order dated 2nd July, 2008 the learned Magistrate issued process in the said case under Sections 192, 196, 199, 200, 420 r/w. 34 of Indian Penal Code. Being aggrieved thereby, this application has been preferred for quashing of an order of the learned Magistrate issuing process against the applicant. 3. For the reasons recorded in the order passed by ..(2).. this Court in the case of V.K.Jain Vs. P.V.Padode; V.K.Jain Vs. P.V.Padode; V.K.Jain Vs. P.V.Padode; 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, which has been upheld by the Hon’ble Apex Court I am of the opinion that the applicant has an efficacious remedy of preferring revision against the order of Magistrate issuing process. Hence, in my view, it would be appropriate that the applicant prefers a revision before the concerned Sessions Court against the order of the Magistrate issuing process. 4. Liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer the necessary revision before the concerned Sessions Court. The learned Advocate for the applicant makes a statement that the necessary revision will be preferred within five weeks from today. In view of this statement, the trial Court shall not proceed with the trial for a period of five weeks. 5. If the revision is preferred within five weeks, delay, if any, in preferring the revision be condoned. On the necessary revision being preferred by the applicant before the concerned Sessions Court, the concerned Sessions Court shall dispose of the matter on merits. 6. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. ..(3).. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]