1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4700 OF 2008 Abdul Gani Haji Usman & Ors. ..Petitioners. V/s. Fr.Siraj Pinto ..Respondent. And H.E.Cardinal Ivan Dias Cardinal & Archbishop. ..Respondent. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4701 OF 2008 Abdul Gani Haji Usman ..Petitioner. V/s. Fr.Siraj Pinto ..Respondent. And H.E.Cardinal Ivan Dias Cardinal & Archbishop. ..Respondent. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4720 OF 2008 Abdul Sattar Haji Usman ..Petitioner. V/s. Fr.Siraj Pinto ..Respondent. And H.E.Cardinal Ivan Dias Cardinal & Archbishop. ..Respondent. Mr.A.N.Nasikwala for petitioners. Mr.I.M.D’Silva for Respondent No.1. 2 CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : JULY 30, 2008. DATE : JULY 30, 2008. DATE : JULY 30, 2008. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. I find substance in the stand taken on behalf of the Respondent that the Petitioners had filed subsequent application claiming the same relief, as is claimed in the application being Interim Notice No.789 of 2006. Copy of the second Application has not been placed on record by the Petitioners. That application has been granted. In fact, amendment in terms of the order passed in the second application has also been carried out. That order has been allowed to become final. 2. In the circumstances, no fault can be found with the opinion recorded by the lower Court in the impugned Judgment that the first application(subject application) filed for same relief had become infructuous. Hence no interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction is warranted. Dismissed. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)