Respondents HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DlVISlON BENCH CORAM: HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HON’BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. 2. ’ Bhoj Bai Wife of Nand Kumar, Aged about — 37 years, Both are Residence of Village — Palod; Post Office — Tekari, Thana -— Abhanpur, Distt — Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS Ramesh Kabi Slo Sri Anand Rao, Kabi R/o, Bumrah, Garage-Compound, Rehnal, Agra Road, Bhiwadi, Distt — Thana, MP. Road Lines, Mohba Bazar, Raipur (C.G.). 2 Peraji Ganta (Huf) R/o Bumrah, Garage, Compound, Rehnal, Agra Road, K Bhiwadi, Distt. Thane, Maharashtra, Present Address — MP. Road, Lines ' Mohaba Bazar Raipur (C.G.). 3. The New !ndia insurance Company Limited, Through : Divisional Manager, Kaohahari Chowk, Jail Road, Raipur (C.G.). Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Present : Shri $.C. Verma, counsel for the appellants. Order (15m Jury, 2009) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta,.C.J. ‘ ’ Misc. Appeal No. 146 of 2004. Appellants 1. Nand Kumar @ Kansu Sahi, Aged Claimants about — 38 years. Shri S.C. Verma, learned counsei for the appeHants, in View of the fact that the appellants are not respondihg to his communication for sending the affidavit in support of the appiication for oondonation of the delay in filing the appeal, seeks permission to withdraw the appeal filed by the appellants for t enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Sixth E uAdditionai Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Raipur, vide award dated 25.10.2002, passed in Claim Case Nail/2000, with the iiEerty of ‘filing another appeal for enhancement cf the compensation as and when the affidavit in support of the delay condonation application is made avaiiable by the appellants. 2). Permission granted. 3) 'With the above liberty, the appeal is dismissed as $ withdrawn. 4) Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned award to learned counsel for the appellants immediately. ' . Sd/_ g .. “a I sdl- sum. mm smHA subbu Chief Jusu'ce Judge