THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO. 31472 OF 2010 30TH March, 2011. Between: MR.DR.P.SURENDRA .. PETITIONER AND MR.DR.B.P.V.KUMAR AND OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO.31472 OF 2010 O R D E R : (PER THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU) The petitioner-Chief Medical Officer in CGHS Wellness Centre No.13, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India appears to have lodged a complaint with the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against his immediate Officer-respondent 1 and other colleagues (respondents herein) alleging financial fraud therein which was followed by a legal notice on the ground of inaction into the complaint. The legal notice was responded by CBI through a communication depicting registration of a case against unknown officials of CGHS. Although the petitioner was communicated through the same communication that some evidence has been collected and the investigation is in progress, yet he chose to file this writ petition. CBI being seized of the matter, in our opinion, there is absolutely no justification for the petitioner to file this writ petition, whose bonafides are otherwise also doubtful because respondent 1 had initiated an enquiry against him into the alleged false claim of LTC bills. More so, a million dollar question remains unanswered by the writ petitioner in respect of his right to file a Public Interest Litigation essentially in a service matter. Viewed thus, writ petition is dismissed. (VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR,J) (NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ) 30th March, 2011. Nagesh babu THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO.31472 OF 2010 O R D E R : (PER THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU) 30TH March , 2011. The petitioner-Chief Medical Officer in CGHS Wellness Centre No.13, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India appears to have lodged a complaint against his superior officer-respondent 1 and other colleagues alleging financial fraud. From the averments made in the writ petition it appears that the writ petition emanates from initiation of proceedings through a charge sheet against the petitioner and enquiry because of alleged false reporting of LTC bills. The petitioner has also approached the Central Bureau of Investigation through a legal notice on the ground of inaction against the respondents which stands replied depicting registration of a case against unknown officials of CGHS. The communication also reveals that investigation is in progress and evidence has been collected, yet the petitioner has filed this writ petition. Fact of the matter being Central Bureau of Investigation has already seized of the matter, we find there is absolutely no reason for the petitioner to have filed this writ petition. We are also not satisfied with the bonafides of the petitioner because he stands already charge sheeted once, therefore, seeks action against the respondents. In the aforementioned backdrop, dismissed.