(D §§§§§3LE 353%?3 g WRIT IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH A’l‘ BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (sy No. Hwy; l 2011 (M Damodar Prasad Guru, S/o. Shri T.P. Guru, aged about 55 years, R/o. Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS I’, Through: - Secretary, Revenué and Disaster Management Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Director, Revenue Department, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Collector, Land Record, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, (C.G.) ETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1. _ State of Chhattisgarh, P H3 HIGH C01 IRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT RH ,ASPI IR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5084 of2011 Damodar Pmsad Guru. VER SI IS RESPONDENTS : Staie of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICI ,F. 226 OF THE CONSTITI )TION OF INDIA SB: H0n’hle Shri Satish K. Agnihntri, J. Present: Shri Saumbh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. M0011hy, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondents. Shri S.P. Navratmg Dy. Commissioner (R), Bilaspur, is present. ORDER ORAL) (Passed on 06 day of September, 201 1) 1. At the very outset, ShdMoorthy, learned counsel appearing fer the State/respondents, on instructioms, submits that the order dated 12.08.2011 (Annexure P/ l) impugred herein, has not been passed by a competent authority in accordance with Rule 20, Part. II, of the Madhya Pradesh/Chhattisgarh Land Record Manual, thus, the same is unsustainable in law and shall not be given eifect. to. 2. In View of the above submission made by leamed State counsel, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication at this stage. 3. Accordingly, the impugied order dated 12.08.2011 (Annexure P/l) is quashed. However, liberty is reserved to the State/respondents to pass appropriate order, if so advised, in accordance with law, in administrative exigenoy and in public interest. .4. The writ petition is allowed. No order asto costs. M4r;’/’/ KJ W