IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 444 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 29th September, 2010. Sudesh Kumar Petitioner through Mr. Amit Dhawan, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Mr. Anil Sharma, Addl.AG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner a Mandamus directing the respondents to refund the amount of `1,00,150/- deposited by him on 06.04.2009 with the Sub Registrar, Jalandhar in pursuance of the demand raised by the Collector, Jalandhar under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 in respect of Sale Deed No. 7859 dated 13.12.2004 got registered in the office of the Sub Registrar, Jalandhar. [2]. The undisputed facts are that the petitioner was allotted a 10 Marla plot No. 958, in J.P.Nagar, Jalandhar by the Improvement Trust, Jalandhar @ `2200/- per marla vide allotment letter dated 19.1.1980 [Annexure P-1]. The petitioner, after paying the entire sale price, applied for registration of the Conveyance Deed and got it registered on 12.12.2004. [3]. Vide my separate order of even date rendered in CWP No. 1743 of 2009 [Dhani Chand & Ors. v State of Punjab & Ors.], the same question has been answered against the petitioner. [4]. For the reasons mentioned in Dhani Chand's case [supra], this writ petition is also dismissed. September 29, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE