IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11442 of 2010 1. SHATRUGHAN CHAUDHARY @ SATRUDHAN CHOUDHARY, son of Sri Gobardhan Chaudhary, Resident of village Ghoshi, P.S. Ghoshi, District Jehanabad, at present at Anjuman Islamia Hall, Muradpur, P.S. Pirbahore, District Patna. 2. Md. Kitabuddin Ansari, Son of Md. Panduk Mian, Resident of village Barhimpur, P.S. Paru, District Muzaffarpur at present at Anjuman Islamia Hall, Muradpur, P.S. Pirbahore, District Patna …… Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR … Opposite Party ----------- For the petitioners : Mr. Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr. Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P. ----- 2 26.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case registered under Sections 399/402 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-B)A, 26 of the Arms Act. It is submitted that though the petitioners are named in the first information report but no incriminating articles or arms and ammunitions had been recovered from the possession of the petitioners, rather the same had been recovered from co-accused Md. Sattar, Md. Sheru and Raju Sardar. It is further stated that petitioners’ 2 antecedents is clean and they are in custody since 16.12.2009 In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the abovenamed petitioners are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 495 of 2009 with a further condition that one of the bailors of the each petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the concerned petitioner, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with him. If, after his release in this case, the petitioners are again found implicated in similar nature of cases, then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. Further, the petitioners shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial. If they fail to remain present on two consecutive dates 3 without any reasonable explanation then the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioners. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)