HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DiVISION BENCH CORAM: HON?BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR,J MA(CtNo.69of2007 Appellant Respondents Chltrangad, S/o Latkhor, R/o Vitlage Neurdih, PO Mandhar, Thana - Dharsiwa, District Raipur, (CG) Versus 1 Ram Kali, Wd/o Balkaran Dewangan, aged about 50 years 2 Ram Kumar S/o Balkaran Dewangan, Aged about 50 years ;i Both R/1 & R/2 are R/o Durga Chowk, Mathpara, Raipur, District Raipur CG 3 Raipur Development Authority Through its Chief ExecutJve Officer, Bajrang Market Raipur, Tehsjl & Dtstrict Raipur, CG • 4 Kawaljeet Singh, S/o Sohendar Singh, R/o Devendra Nagar, Sector - 1, Raipur, Tehsii & District Raipur, CG 5 Mahavir Prasad, S/o Ram Khilawan Chandrakar, R/oi Village Neurdsh, PO Mandhar, Thana ~ Dharsiwa District Raipur (CG) Appeal under Section 173 ofthe MotorVehideAct.1988 Present : None for the appeilant Shri Akhiiesh Dalpati, counseS for respondent No.3. Shri Avinash C Sahu, counsei for respondent No.5. ORDER ^th (19tn January, 2010) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appellant. 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecutjon. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge padma