IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH MAY 2010 / 29TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 26799 of 2008(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- AMBILY.R.,BHAVANA, PAZHAVEEDU P.O. ALAPPUZHA, 688 009. BY ADV. SRI.P.SREEKUMAR SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, RERPESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DIRECTOR, LAL BAHADUR SASTRI CENTRE FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR SC, LBS CENTRE FOR R3 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. M.A. ARIF. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 26799 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 19th day of May, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed this writ petition contending that in the State Eligibility Test conducted by the respondents in the year 2007, the benefit of moderation was not given to the petitioner. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the issue involved in this writ petition is covered by the decision of this Court in W.P(C) No. 25380/2007. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the fact that the issue is covered by that decision. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed following that decision. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.