R. S. A. No. 2596 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : R. S. A. No. 2596 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : April 26, 2011 Jagrup Singh and another .... Appellants Vs. Gurpreet Singh and others .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Amarjit Markan, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Simranjit Singh, Advocate for the respondents. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Appellants have moved C. M. No. 5082-C of 2011 alleging that parties have effected compromise Annexure C-1 and the appeal be allowed in terms of the compromise. The application is accompanied by affidavits of both the appellants as well as affidavits of respondents no.1 and 3. Respondent no.1 is also attorney of respondent no.2, who is his sister. Learned counsel for both the parties state that parties have effected compromise Annexure C-1 and the appeal be allowed in terms thereof. R. S. A. No. 2596 of 2010 (O&M) 2 Appellant no.1 and respondent no.1 are also said to be present in person. Pursuant to compromise, respondent no.1 has received the amount of Rs.11,00,000/- today in Court from appellant no.1. The amount has been received by respondent no.1 for himself and as attorney of respondent no.2. The case has, thus, been lawfully compromised. In view of the compromise, the instant second appeal is allowed. Judgments and decrees of the courts below are set aside and suit filed by Harcharan Singh (since deceased and represented by respondents no.1 and 2 as his legal representatives) stands dismissed. Compromise Annexure C-1 shall form part of the judgment and decree-sheet. April 26, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE