IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH MARCH 2010 / 19TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 3457 of 2010(F) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M. IQBAL, CIRCILE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUNALUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT, S/O. MEERASAHIB, AGED 44 YEARS, RESIDING AT ROSE MAHAL, VAKKANAD P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE SRI.P.PRIJITH SRI.S.VAIDYANATHAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. KERALA. 3. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (INTELLIGENCE), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. ANTONY MUKKATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sou. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J ------------------------- W.P.(C).No.3457 OF 2010 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner was placed under suspension in connection with an incident occurred on 11.10.2009 while he was working as Circle Inspector of Police in Punalur. Subsequently he was reinstated in service. However, he was transferred and posted as per Ext.P11 order. Petitioner is challenging Ext.P11 order dated 25.01.2010. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that subsequent to Ext.P11, another order has been issued by the 2nd respondent transferring the petitioner to Pathanamthitta. 2. If the petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P9, Ext.P11 or any other subsequent transfer order, he has to approach the first respondent for getting redressal of his grievances. Therefore without making any observations as to the merits of the contentions of the petitioner I am disposing this writ petition granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the WPC.3457/10 2 first respondent by submitting a detailed representation indicating all his grievances within a period of two weeks from today. In case of receipt of such a representation from the petitioner, the first respondent shall consider and pass orders expeditiously at any rate within a period of one month thereafter. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE. SOU.