1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3490 of 2010 Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation, Aurangabad through its Executive Engineer, Majalgaon Canal Division, Gangakhed .. Petitioner Versus M/s. Shinde & Sons A/4, Shanti Niwad, Ambikanagar, Ahmednagar 414 005. .. Respondents --- Mr. S.S. Thombare,Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. G.K. Naik-Thigale, Advocate for respondent. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI,J. DATE : 25TH JUNE, 2010. PER COURT :- 1] The petitioner has filed the present petition challenging the order dated 20th February, 2010, thereby separating the proceedings in MARJI NO.44/2003 and MARJI NO. 62/2006. 2] Shri Thombare, learned counsel for the 2 petitioner submits that by an earlier action, the proceedings were directed to be heard together and when on an earlier occasion, the application filed by the respondent was rejected, there was no occasion for the learned trial court to have passed the impugned order. 3] Shri Thigale, learned counsel for the respondent, on the contrary submits that the impugned order has been passed inasmuch as, on account of the proceedings in MARJI no. 44/2003, the proceedings in MARJI No.62/2006 were unnecessarily prolonged and that the respondent was deprived of the benefits of the award. 4] However, the parties have now filed the consent terms. The same are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The petition, therefore, stands disposed of in terms of the consent terms, which are duly signed by the parties. Rule is, therefore, made absolute in accordance with the consent terms. [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/