IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2009 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 3156 of 2009(A) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------- CHANDRA V.,V.K.HOUSE,P.O.PAPPINISSERI(W) KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN SRI.V.VENUGOPAL RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,THALASSERY. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, THALASSERY. 3. STATE OF KERALA-REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. K.C.RAUF, RUBIN PLAZA M.G.ROAD, THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN FOR R4 SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA FOR R4 GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 3156 OF 2009 (A) ==================== Dated this the 4th day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T The claim raised in this writ petition is for assignment of 1¼ cents comprised in TS No.209/2, Block No.13 of Thalassery village. Petitioner sought for its assignment by making Ext.P1 application addressed to the 1st respondent. 2. On notice, the 4th respondent has filed a counter affidavit and along with the counter affidavit, he has produced Ext.R4(b), an application made by him for the assignment of the same land, which according to him was made in 1997. 3. Thus both the petitioner and the 4th respondent are claiming assignment of the same plot of land and both the applications are pending consideration of the 1st respondent. 4. In view of the rival claims now made by both of these persons, I direct the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P1 made by the petitioner and Ext.R4(b) made by the 4th respondent together and with notice to both of them. Orders shall be passed, as expeditiously as WPC 3156/09 :2 : possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp