IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2574 of 2011 GAJENDRA CHOUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 30.03.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner being the father-in- law is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A, 323,376,380 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The informant is ready to go to the husband’s house. Her only apprehension is with the petitioner (father-in-law). The petitioner undertakes not to interfere with the married life of the informant. Though both sides have certain apprehensions but the same are not being deliberated since that will obstruct the restitution of conjugal life. Considering the aforesaid stand of the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 358 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties 2 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. If the petitioner i.e., father-in- law in any manner substantially interferes in conjugal life of the informant then the informant will have to liberty to file an appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)