-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3898 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 582 OF 2005 Sajid Amit Ansari ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents ... Mr. A.P.Mundergi i/b Prakash Naik Advocate for Applicant Mr. P.S.Hingorani A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 12,2005 DATE : JULY 12,2005 DATE : JULY 12,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail. The applicant has been convicted under Section 376 of IPC by the learned Sessions Judge Gr.Bombay in Sessions Case No. 266 of 2000 and he is sentenced R.I. for three years. -2- 3. It is stated by the learned advocate for the applicant that the applicant was on bail during the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. This statement has not been controverted by the prosecution. It is further submitted that the appeal is not likely to be heard within a period of three years, hence, it is prayed that bail may be granted to the applicant. Looking to all these facts, I am inclined to grant bail. 4. The applicant to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties to make up that amount. During the pendency of this appeal, the applicant shall report once in three months to Nirmal Nagar Police Station. 5. Application is disposed of. [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]