1 ca9830.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9830 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO.20067 OF 2010 [ Dattu Jaiwanta Somase & Anr. vs. Raosaheb s/o Gundiba Sakhare & Ors. ] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. D.J. Choudhari, Advocate for applicants. Mr. V.R. Sonwalkar, Advocate for R-1. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 1st DECEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard learned Counsel appearing for the applicants. 2. Perused the contents of the civil application. There is delay of 127 days in filing the second appeal. The Counsel appearing for respondent No.1 vehemently opposed the application for condonation of 2 ca9830.10 delay. However, in the light of explanation offered in para-4 of the application, I am inclined to allow this application for condonation of delay. It is true that, explanation offered in para-4 is not in detail, however, looking to the length of the delay and in the facts and circumstances of this case, it is desirable to condone the delay. Delay stands condoned. 3. Accordingly, Civil Application is allowed and stands disposed of. . Second Appeal to be listed for hearing on 21-12-2011. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/DEC11