IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40389 of 2009 1. JAGDISH SAH Son Of Late Hazari Sah. 2. KASHI SAH @ KASHINATH SAH. 3. DHRUV SAH SON OF JAGDISH SAH 4. SANJU DEVI WIFE OF KASHI SAH ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE – GOHPUR, POLICE STATION – GARKHA, DISTRICT SARAN (CHAPRA) Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR . ----------- 02. 18.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged is under sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It submitted that petitioners nos.1, 2,3 and 4 are father-in-law, Bhaisur, Dewar and Gotni respectively. It is further submitted that the allegations made out in the complaint are not by way of dowry as a matter of fact, demand as alleged was for running the business. It is further submitted that daughter of the complainant was admittedly used to remain unwell on account of her appendices problem which led to her death. It is further submitted that the complainant and other witnesses are not prepared to proceed further with the case. Learned counsel for the state is not in a position to refute the submission made on behalf of the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is 2 directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chapra, District Saran in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 18 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)