1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.1683 of NO.1683 of NO.1683 of 1985 Kisan Pradhan .. Plaintiff versus K.R.Warty .. Defendant Ms.Sarkar i/b M.Munim for Plaintiff Mr Vimal Bhabda i.b Apte & Co for Defendant CORAM CORAM CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J : D.G. KARNIK, J : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED DATED DATED : 11th August, 2005. : 11th August, 2005. : 11th August, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the plaintiff. Suit is for recovery of money. The defendant has not filed any written statement for nearly 20 years. Hence, the averments made in the plaint are deemed to be admitted. 2. The suit of the plaintiff is decreed under Order 8 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) with 2 modification that interest shall be payable at 9 % p.a. from the date of the suit till payment. 3. The drawing up of the decree is expedited. D.G.KARNIK, J