IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 9369 of 2008 Between: 1 Menni Satyanarayana, W/o. Rama Rao, R/o. Nallajerla Village, Nallajerla Mandal, West Godavari District. 2 Smt. Pathuri Tulasamma, W/o. Narayudu, R/o. Nallajerla Village, Nallajerla Mandal, West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The State of A.P., Rep by the District Collector, West Godavari at Eluru. 2 The Special Deputy Collector & Land Acquisition Officer, Y.R.Project, Jangareddigudem,West Godavari District. 3 The Assistant Executive Engineer, Section-III, J.R.M. & Sub-Division, Y.P.Division, Irrigation Department, Jangareddigudem, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandmus declaring the action of the respondents in not following the guidelines issued in G.O.Ms.No.601 Revenue (LA) Department dated 19.06.1992 for payment of compensation to the frutit bearing trees i.e., 60 coconut and 40 cashewnut trees covered by Sy.No.994/2 of the 1st petitioner and for 41 coconut trees covered by Sy.Nos.646/2B of the 2nd petitioner situated at Nallajerla Village and Mandal, West Godavari District as certified by respondent No.3 and also to pass a supplementary laward dated 12.05.2005 passed by the 2nd respondent to the Original Award No.22/03 dated 01.07.2003 for payment of compensation towards fruit bearing trees to the petitioners and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.V.SIVAIAH Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.9369 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: The learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to file fresh writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition, if any necessary. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 9.2.2009 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.9369 of 2008 9.2.2009