IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.16327 of 2010 Date of Decision : September 13, 2010. Didar Singh and another .....Petitioners versus Punjab National Bank and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Gaurav Sethi, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners stood guarantors for the loan said to have been availed by respondent Nos.4 to 6 from respondent Nos.1 to 3. They are now aggrieved by the notice under Section 13 (2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short 'the Act') served upon them as well. Suffice it to say that the petitioners are at liberty to submit their objections, if not submitted earlier against the aforesaid notice and if their objections do not find favour with the Bank, or if further action under Section 13 (4) of the Act is taken against them, the petitioners shall be at liberty to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal against such action as ruled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.5990 of 2010 C.W.P.No .16327 of 2010 2 (United Bank of India versus Satyawati Tondon and others), decided on 26.7.2010. Disposed of. Dasti. September 13, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE