IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 26346 of 2006 Between: 1 The Muslim Educational Association, registered No. 10/60, Uravakonda, Ananthapur District, repby its President Silar Sarmas Vali, S/o Silar Shaksha Vali, R/o uravakonda, Ananthapur District. 2 D. B. Zeelan S/o Baba Sab Uravakonda, Ananthapur District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Commissioner and Director of School Education, Andhra Pradesh, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 3 The District Educational Officer, Anantapur Anantapur District. 4 The Deputy Educational Officer, Gooty Anantapur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings Rc. No. 6472/B1/2004 dt 18-10-2006 of the District Collector, Anantapur as illegal arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to sec 24 of A.P. Education Act 1982 and in Violation of Art 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to allow the second petitioner to continue as correspondent of the Aided Arabic High School Uravakonda, Anantapur District and to pass such other order or order Orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem ﬁt and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.D.GOWD Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following : ORDER Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with regard to the ﬁrst petitioner. He further submits that he has no instructions from the second petitioner. The second petitioner has not chosen to make any alternative arrangements to represent him. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with regard to the ﬁrst petitioner and dismissed for non-prosecution with regard to the second petitioner. No costs. __________ 10-11-2008 rkk