IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6909 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 26.11.2009 Harkirat Singh and others .....Petitioners versus State Bank of Patiala .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Puneet Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners are the landlords. They have filed an eviction petition against the respondent-Bank-tenant. They allege that there was a deficiency in the arrears of rent tendered by the respondent-bank before the Rent Controller, Ludhiana on 14.1.2008. As a result thereto, the petitioners have moved an application before the Rent Controller, Ludhiana to pass the eviction order in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rakesh Wadhawan and others versus M/s Jagdamba Industrial Corporation and others, 2003 (2) Civil Court Cases 361 (SC). The said application is pending consideration before the Rent Controller, Ludhiana since March, 2009. C.R. No.6909 of 2009 (O&M) 2 In this backdrop, the petitioner-landlords seek directions to the Rent Controller, Ludhiana, to decide the said application at the earliest by passing an appropriate order. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners at some length and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to direct the Rent Controller, Ludhiana, to decide the afore-stated application of the petitioners, on the date fixed i.e. 28.11.2009 or on the next date of hearing. Ordered accordingly. Disposed of. Dasti. 26-11-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE