1 wp1258.10 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1258 OF 2010 Dilip Madhukar Jadhav. ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ....Respondent. None for the petitioner. Mr. A.S.Gadkari, APP for State. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND P.D.KODE, JJ. DATED:- OCTOBER 8, 2010. P.C. 1. This Petition through jail challenges the order dated 20th March, 2010. However, it is noticed that the Petitioner was released on furlough leave on the earlier occasion when he overstayed by 746 days. At that time, the Petitioner’s wife had offered surety. On this occasion also, the wife of the Petitioner stood surety for the Petitioner, which has not been accepted by the appropriate authority. The appropriate authority, however, called upon the Petitioner to offer some other surety. During the penency of the Petition, the Petitioner has offered surety of his son Nilesh Dilip Jadhav. The learned APP informs that police enquiry was made and it is found that the Petitioner’s son is gainfully employed and running hotel business in the name and style of Nilesh Punjab 2 wp1258.10 Dhaba. In that case, if the surety offered by Nilesh Dilip Jadhav is found to be solvent surety, it will be open to the appropriate authority to consider release of Petitioner on furlough leave on condition already mentioned in the order or additional condition, as may be advised. That be done as expeditiously as soon as solvent surety is offered by the Petitioner. Petition disposed of accordingly. 2. Copy of this order be forwarded forthwith to the Petitioner, who is in jail. (P.D.KODE, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)