IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51043 of 2008 1. AMARJIT KAUR, wife of Baijnath Mehta 2. Baij Nath Mehta,son of Chunni Lal Mehta All are resident of village-Nirmali, P.S.-Balua Bazar,District-Supaul. 3. Naresh Mehta,son of Gopal Mehta A resident of village-Hindolwa,P.S.- Birpur,District-Supaul. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Ruknini Devi,wife of Baij Nath Mehta, resident of village-Hindolwa,P.S.- Birpur,District-Supaul. At present resident of village-Nirmali,P.S.-Balua Bazar,District-Supaul. ----------- 05/ 27-04-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that though petitioners are Sautan, husband and Devar of the complainant having severe allegations but matters have been reconciled and she is residing with all the family members. In the suggested facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case No.373-C/2005, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Birpur, District- Supaul, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )