IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32121 of 2011 Indrasen Rai, Son of Late Bangali Rai, Resident of Village Vyapur, P.S. Maner, District Patna, At present Ramjichak Bata H/o Father in law Late Jogindar Rai, P.S. Digha, District Patna. -------Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party --------------- 02/- 15/10/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, is one of the named accused in this case being father-in-law of deceased daughter of the informant, who died within five years of her marriage under unnatural circumstances after suffering for demand of dowry, torture etc. Submission is that petitioner has no concerned with the affairs of his son and deceased dauther-in-law and co-accused Arun Rai @ Arup Kumar Rai has already been granted the privilege by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 21.12.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 35840 of 2010 and petitioner deserves same treatment. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor pointed out that prayer of anticipatory bail of the petitioner along with his wife was refused earlier vide order dated 09/12.10.2009 passed in A.B.P. No. 5045/2009 by learned Sessions Judge, Patna, but since thereafter, petitioner kept mum and avoided appearance causing much delay. This itself, disentitles the petitioner for the privilege sought. Accordingly, prayer of anticipatory bail of the above named petitioner in connection with Maner P.S. Case No. 138 of 2009, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur is hereby rejected. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)