FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WRIT PETITION NO. 635 OF 2011 MANAVTA ABHYASPEETH DHULE AND ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioner(s) : Shri Talekar S.B. AGP for Respondent(s): Shri Godbharale V.D. ... CORAM : D B BHOSALE & S B DESHMUKH, JJ. Dated: July 20, 2011 ... 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioners are seeking direction to respondents 1 to 3 to grant approval to the appointment of petitioner 3 as Shikshan Sevak with effect from 15.6.2007. Shri Talekar, learned Advocate for the petitioners, at the outset, invited our attention to the communication dated 10.11.2010 (Exhibit A-2 to the Writ Petition), addressed to the Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development, Nasik by respondent 4 - Project Officer. We have perused the said communication. It is clear that respondent 4 - Project Officer has recommended the case of petitioner 3 for grant of approval to the Additional Commissioner. Till this date, according to the petitioners, the Additional Commissioner has not taken any decision in respect of petitioner 3 on the basis of the communication dated 10.11.2010. Keeping that in view, we are satisfied that this Writ Petition can be conveniently disposed of by the following order :- (A) Respondent 3 - Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development, Nasik shall consider and decide the recommendation made by respondent 4 - Project Officer, vide communication dated 10.11.2010 in respect of petitioner 3 as expeditiously as possible and FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS (2) WP/635/2011 preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of this order, on merits in accordance with law, if not decided earlier. (B) The petitioner is directed to communicate this order to the Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development, Nasik within a period of two weeks from today. (C) We observe that, prima facie, if the Additional Commissioner is not inclined to accept the recommendation made by respondent 4 - Project Officer, he shall grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. 4. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. ( S B DESHMUKH, J. ) ( D B BHOSALE, J. ) akl