THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE NO.767 OF 2010 4TH MARCH, 2011. Between: SINGASANI SIVAIAH .. PETITIONER AND STATE OF A.P. REP., ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPT., SECRETARIAT, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD AND OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE NO.767 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (PER THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU) There is a direction dated 9.3.2010 requiring the respondents to deal with the encroachments by due adherence to the statutory provisions which is said to have been observed in breach by the respondents. But, counter filed negates the contention because we find that steps for removal of encroachments have already been taken and some encroachments have also been removed. In that view of the matter contempt case is not maintainable. Disposed of. However, in case of abnormal delay, if any, the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the court through a fresh contempt case. (SANJAY KUMAR, J) (NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ) 4TH MARCH, 2011. Nagesh babu THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE NO.767 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (PER THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU) 4TH MARCH, 2011.