IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWELVETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 11453 of 2009 Between: Kondeti Abbulu S/o. Saraswati, Hindu R/o. Kanderavalli, Achanta Mandal, W.G. District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner, Board of Intermediate, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3 The Regional Joint Director Higher Education, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 4 The Krishnaveni Educational Society & Junior College, Tanuku, W.G. District, Rep. by its Secretary & Correspondent Sri Bopanna Krishna Chowdary .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of Madnamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the action of the Respondents 1 to 3 in not considering the petitioner's representation dt. 7-5-2009 and in not taking any action against the 4th Respondent on the basis of the said representation is illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation dt. 7-5-2009 and take appropriate action against the 4th Respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.CHIDAMBARAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.11453 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in not considering the petitioner’s representation dated 7.5.2009 alleging that the 4th respondent-College has been running a Junior College in violation of the Statutory Rules, as arbitrary and illegal. A copy of the petitioner’s representation dated 7.5.2009 has been placed before this Court and the material on record further shows that the complaint was received in the office of the respondents 2 and 3 on 24.5.2009. In the circumstances, the respondents 2 and 3 are bound to consider and make necessary enquiry into the allegations made by the petitioner. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to the correctness of the allegations made by the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 7.5.2009, after giving an opportunity to the 4th respondent to rebut the said allegations and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. No costs. _______________ Justice G. Rohini Dt.12.06.2009 mrb