THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.8181 of 1997 Dated:24.1.2007 Between M/s.Vinodilal Maloiram Jewellers Charkaman, Gulzar House, Hyderabad Rep., by Maliram …..Petitioner and 1.B.Sathaiah and others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.8181 of 1997 ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled being aggrieved by the order passed by the Second Appellate Authority in S.A.No.2 of 1996 dated 6.12.1996 whereunder the order passed by the 1st Appellate Authority in S.E.No.14 of 1993 dated 7.11.1995 directing the petitioner- management to deposit an amount of Rs.15,750/- in favour of the 1st respondent was modiﬁed, enhancing the amount from Rs.15,750/-to Rs.21,070/-. The petitioner is the appellant and 1st respondent is the employee. It appears that when the services of the 1st respondent were terminated illegally, he ﬁled S.E.No.14 of 1993 on the ﬁle of the 1st Appellate Authority under the Shops and Establishments Act, 1988. After an elaborate consideration of the material placed before it, the 1st Appellate Authority passed an order on 7.11.1995 granting an amount of Rs.15,750/- as service compensation including un-availed leave wages for 45 days and one month notice pay. The petitioner-management did not ﬁle any appeal against the said order passed by the 1st Appellate Authority. The 1st respondent-employee ﬁled an appeal before the Second Appellate Authority under the Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 in S.A.No.2 of 1996. The Second Appellate Authority after an elaborate consideration of the matter held that the 1st respondent is entitled to an amount of Rs.21,070/- as service compensation and wages for 60 days of un-availed leave including one month’s bonus. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner-management has ﬁled the present writ petition. I have gone through the impugned order and other material made available on record. The petitioner-management has not questioned the order passed by the 1st Appellate Authority in S.E.No.14 of 1993 dated 7.11.1995. The S.A is again ﬁled by the employee. In the S.A an amount of Rs.5,000/- was enhanced. The enhancement of amount by the Second Appellate Authority does not seem to be unreasonable in the facts and circumstances of the case. Therefore, I am of the opinion that the Second Appellate Authority has not committed any error in enhancing the service compensation from Rs.15,750/- to Rs.21,070/-. Writ petition is devoid of merits and the same is liable to be dismissed. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _________ 24.01.2007 rkk