Criminal Misc. No. M- 34301 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M- 34301 of 2010 Date of decision:-24.1.2011 Gurwinderpal Singh @ Goldy ...Petitioner Versus U.T. Chandigarh and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Sukhjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Standing Counsel for respondent No.1-U.T. Chandigarh. Mr. Daman Jeet, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the FIR No. 131 dated 26.5.2010 under Sections 324,506 and 326 IPC registered at Police Station Mani Majra, U.T. Chandigarh on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-1). Respondent Nos.2 and 3 also appeared through counsel and filed their joint additional affidavit admitting the factum of compromise and stating that they are having no objection if the FIR in question and consequential proceedings are quashed qua petitioner. As per compromise (Annexure P-1), both the parties have settled the dispute amicably as per the conditions recorded in the compromise. Counsel for the respondents do not dispute the genuineness of the compromise (Annexure P-1) annexed with the petition. In appropriate cases FIR can be quashed on the basis of Criminal Misc. No. M- 34301 of 2010 -2- compromise by exercising power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are not compoundable. It was so held by Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab, 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052. Hence, in view of joint additional affidavit of respondent Nos.2 and 3 and in the interest of harmonious relations between the parties, the present petition is accepted and FIR No. 131 dated 26.5.2010 under Sections 324,506 and 326 IPC registered at Police Station Mani Majra, U.T. Chandigarh alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, is quashed qua petitioner. The petition is disposed of accordingly. January 24, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Vijay Asija JUDGE