~i IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR Cr.M.P. N0,^1^ (-1 /2010 CRIMINAL MISCLLANEOUS PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. APPLICANTS .»-l^2' ^>s- Smt. Sushma Jaiswal, W/o. Vijay Kumar Jaiswal, Aged about 26 years, Caste-Jaiswal. Sagar Kumar Jaiswal, S/o. Vijay Kumar Jaiswal, Aged about 6 years, . ^ ,, Caste- Jaiswal. 'phyw^yh UiwfrffU e/"n fip^UcL»nt- -nst' 1 T^o-^-t^ Both are R/o. ViUage Kurunwar, P.S.-Vishrampur, Tah.- Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS NON-APPLICANT Vijay Kumar Jaiswal, S/o. Vishwanath Jaiswal, Aged aout 25 years, Caste-Jaiswal, R/o. Ambikapur, Boripara, P.S. 8s Tah. Ambikapiu-, Distt. Surguja (C.G.j ^ %-HC-22 ^•a ^ kri<s''-(?' E^^ y Sfl^I^iT R-fi?b SIT^I s^^i'ti -<af^a f:; ^si ^iraRra, ^•dly'i'c, r«i<ni^i,< tlWWT^JHrai ..fc?..^...^.-.. ..^ ^^ff' an^T ?'RTW ^HfttT SB : Hoa'ble Shri Bfaaindra Mclhaa Shrivastava. J. Ql.ia.2010 Shri Ashok Kumar Shiikla Shri R.P. Smgh, counsel fdr Heard on admission. Leamed counsel for the a Issuance of direction to fhe disposal ofthe claiin for mamteiiance Leamed counsel for fhe a^| pendency of the appUcation, grant of interim maintenance and object of awarding maiateni been completely fl-ustrated. On fhe other, leamed fhat he has no objection to any fhe maintenance appUcation. 4if^ic'l4T'T +4f4-(^ff ^ ^SLdl ^t^R '^srfigH 311^1 counsel for the applicants. non-applicant a^pUcants aakes a linuted prayer for cojacemed Magbtrate for esqieditious by the appUeants. , ajjpUcants sutomlts ttiat on account of p^rticularty when fhe applieation for tjas been rejected, Ifce veiy purpose fence uitder Section 125 Cr.P.C. has coilnsel for fhe non-appllcant sutomits direction for »cpeditiousdisposal of Under fhese circumstanc^s, it would be appropriate at Uiis stage to pass the order for exp|editious disposal of fhe appUcation under Section 125 Cr.P.C. filed ^y fhe appVcscat. According, fhis petition is finally disposed of wifh a dire(ftion to fhe Addltional Chief Judlc^al Magistoate, Suiajpur, to finaUy [ift^ife'q /y.,^"l-"'\. '':\ XI-HC-22 ^. 'fr-,,^ .y sn^i'^1 ^(Riailtg %t|WHRd Praweea -y^ ^wiv\ti, ^wte, feirey twwn aiKiw •-BT, 200 311^1 TR'IWCTfel -I(-i^'2- decide fhe application for grant monffas from the date ofreceipt •EiipfeifrT iTitRif ^'feIA'rfsresre ^TSrtigHSII^f ^f maintenaace within a period of 4 ^fcopy ofthte order. Considering fhat fhe appU((ation has remained pendii^ for Che last 5 years, a report shaU b^ submttted to fhis Comt by the concenied Magistrate whether |Jie order of fhe Court has been complied with or not, unmedjate]^ after expiiy of period of 4 months from the date ofreeeiptofcopy o^this order.— Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [Tft^ '^q