THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.5112 OF 2009 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners, who are the plaintiffs, in O.S.No.179 of 2007 filed this Civil Revision Petition aggrieved by the order of dismissal of I.A.No.511 of 2009 filed for receiving documents condoning the delay in filing the documents. The Court below while taking into account the chequred events and also as the suit was posted for arguments, dismissed the application. Hence, this revision. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also on perusal of the material available on record including the affidavit filed in support of the application, it is seen that except mentioning the details of the documents, which the petitioners are seeking to be received in evidence, they did not state as to why they could not file the documents at the earlier stage of the proceedings. The Court below was right in holding that to fill up the lacunae in the evidence, the petitioners are seeking to file the documents at the stage when the suit is posted for arguments. Hence, in the absence of any sufficient reasons as to why the documents could not be filed earlier and as the evidence of the parties is closed and the suit is posted for arguments, I do not find any illegality or infirmity in the impugned order so as to interfere with the same under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The Civil Revision Petition fails and is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J Dated 30th October, 2009 vrn