IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No : 6762 of 2008 Between: Vemuri Munemma W/o. Changa Reddy, Hindu R/o. Chiguruvada Village,Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND Tirupathi Urban Development Authority, Tirupathi Chittoor District, Rep. by its Vice Chairman. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declare the inaction on the part of the Respondent in granting final approval and to releasing the mortgaged property which was mortgaged on 10-10-2005 under Security measures for approval of lay out vide Roc No.2128/G1/2005 dt. 16-12- 2005 in S.No. 166/5 (P) for an extent of 132 Sq. yards Plot No.3 out of Ac 0.21 cents situated at Chiguruwada South Kondriga Village, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Chittoor District amounts to erroneous, arbitrary and violative of Art. 14, 19 , 21 and 300(A) of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to release the mortgaged property forthwith in favour of the petitioner without any further delay in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri T.C.Krishnan Counsel for the Respondent : Sri P.Ganga Rami Reddy The Court made the following O R D E R: This writ petition has been instituted to declare the inaction on the part of the respondent in granting final approval to the petitioner as illegal and arbitrary. Sri T.C. Krishnan, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to comply with truthfully and faithfully all such conditions, which have been imposed for release of the final lay out plan, as stipulated by the respondent – Urban Development Authority. Heard Sri P. Ganga Rami Reddy, the learned counsel for the respondent. If the writ petitioner complies with all the conditions on or before 15th April 2008, the proposed auction of the plots in her lay out, be not proceeded with by the respondent. On the other hand, if the petitioner commits any default in complying with the conditions stipulated by the respondent Authority, the further action, as proposed by them, may be taken up without any further reference to this Court. With this, the writ petition stands disposed of, but however, without costs. (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) 28th March 2008 Note: Issue CC in two days. (bo) ksld ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}