&^ ^ .^ ' ^. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WR!T PETfTION iS) N0.1301 OF 2003 g Ku. Zaibunisha Rizvi, aged about 5S yeara, D/o Late Namdar Khan, Occupation Retired Teacher, Resident of Karbaia Chowk, Bilaspur, Tahsit and Dist. Bilaspur (CG). ^* ^^.^^S t itSKUWUfcW1 versys 1. State of Chhaffisgarh, through Secreter/, School Education Department, DKS Shavan, Manfraiaya, Raipur (CG). 2. Commissioner, Dirsctorate of Public Education, Shastri Chowk, Raipur (CO). 3. Director, Public Instructions, Mantralaya, Shastri Chowk, Raipur (CG). 4. Subhaniya Anjuman islamiya Samiti. through its Secretary, Gondapara, 0/Vrit petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of India) : Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnihofri, J. :- Ms Hamida Sjddiqui, counse! for She petitloner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Adv. Generat for the State. ORDER (Passed on this 11t dayofAprii, 200S Wrth the c-onsent of tearned couns^ appearing for the parties. the peiitlon is heard finaiiy. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the ititiQner does not want to contest the matter on merit, at this stage. However, iearned counse! prays that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representafon before the respondente No.2 & 3 to cohsider her case in accordance with !aw within a stipulated period. 5) Shri Thakur, Searned Cfy. Adv. Genwal appearing on behaff of the State, submits that, in the event, a r^resentation is made by the petitioner, the same shal! be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own rnerits, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 4) In view of the foregoing, according to learned counsei for ths petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 5) Accord'mgly, the writ petiuon stands disposed of. — Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge