IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 262 OF 2009 MRS. SANGEETA PEDNEKAR ... Petitioner Versus THE GOA INFORMATION COMMISSION AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Anthony D' Silva, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. Bandodkar, Additional Government Advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr. D. Shirodkar, Advocate for respondent no.3. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 18th February, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. Silva, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Bandodkar, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2 and Mr. Shirodkar, learned Counsel for respondent no.3. 2. Mr. Silva, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner states that respondent no.1 after accepting the statement made by respondent no.3 that they have complied with the directions given by the Commission has closed and disposed of the complaint by order dated 5th December, 2008. According to Mr. Silva, the documents alleged to have been sent by respondent no.3 were not in compliance with the directions given by respondent no.1 as is clear from the order dated 25th November, 2009 passed by this Court. 3. In view of the above, Mr. Silva submits that the order dated 5th December, 2008 passed by respondent no.1 be quashed and set aside and the matter remanded to respondent no.1 for fresh decision. Mr. Shirodkar, learned Counsel for respondent no.3 opposes the prayer. 4. In view of the order dated 25th November, 2009 passed by this Court, it is clear that the proceedings were closed after accepting the statement made by respondent no.3 herein that all the information ordered to be furnished to the petitioner was sent by Registered A.D. and the same was refused by the petitioner. However, it appears that as directed, the information was not supplied to the petitioner. 5. In view of the above, the order dated 5th December, 2008 passed by respondent no.1 is quashed and set aside and the matter remanded to respondent no.1 for fresh decision. Respondent no.1 shall pass appropriate order in accordance with law after giving opportunity of being heard to the parties. 6. Mr. Bandodkar, learned Additional Government Advocate states that in terms of the order dated 4th August, 2010, preliminary enquiry is held by the Director of Panchayat within a period of three months as directed and pursuant thereto, the disciplinary proceedings are being held against the erring officials. The disciplinary proceedings shall be completed within a period of six months from today. The Director of Panchayat shall file compliance report within a period of one month after the completion of disciplinary proceedings. 7. Writ Petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA