BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16299 of 2011 1 SSI VENTURE (P) LTD., REP BY ITS DIRECTOR, R. RANGARAJAN, 34 TIRUMALAI ROAD, T. NAGAR, CHENNAI-14. 2 R. RANGARAJAN 3 M. RAJAMANICKAM ... PETITIONERS/A3 & NOT ARRAYED Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TUTICORIN & DISTRICT, CRIME NO.70/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR.N.MOHIDEEN BASHA, FOR M/S. P.ARULMUDI Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, Addl.Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 419, 468, 471, 420 and 120(b) I.P.C. in Crime No.70 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the main allegation of forging the document was made only against A1 and the petitioners have been implicated on the allegation that they are the purchasers of the disputed property. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. 3. Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the first petitioner has been arrayed as A3 and the main allegation of forging the document was made only against A1. It is submitted that the investigation is pending. 4. The fact remains that the main allegation of fabricating the document was made only against A1 and the petitioners have been implicated on the allegation that they are the purchasers of the disputed property. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tuticorin, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) each with one surety for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Judicial Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the (*) 2nd petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 5.30 p.m. for a period of four weeks and thereafter(*) as and when required and the 3rd petitioner shall be available for interrogation as and when required. Sd/- 19/12/2011 (*) Corrected order issued / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO To be Substituted for the order already despatched 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, TUTICORIN 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TUTICORIN 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TUTICORIN & DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1.CC to M/S. P.ARULMUDI Advocate SR.No.44485 ssk/21.12.2011 /6c -2p/- SMA/23.12.2011/6C/2P Corrected order ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16299 of 2011 Date :19/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/