^>f IN THE HON'BLE mGH COURT OFCmtATTISGARH At BILASPUR Writ Petition (S)No. ^4-?/ 2008 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Versus 1. h. Smt. SEEMA VODITELWAR W/o Shri. Manohar Voditelwar Aged about 49 Years, Employed as Assistant Grade-III, O/o Executive Engineer, MJP, Second'Thase, Works Division, Water Resources Deptt. Raipur, Residing at : Qr. No. 43, Geetanjali Nagar, Sector-I, RAIPUR State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, Water Resources Depaitment, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, RAIPUR-492001 (CG) The Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources Department, Sihawa Bhawan, Civil lines, RAIPUR-49200 IfCG') TheChiefEngineer, Water Resources Department, Mahanadi Pariyojana, RAIPUR (CG) The Executive Engineer, MJP,Second Phase, Works Division, Water Resources Department, RAIPUR(CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOFINDIA. 2. 3. 4. .w ^ 1. 2. 3. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER :- Sameas given in the Cause Title. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS :- Same as given m the Cause Title; PARTICULARS OF THE CAUSE / ORDER AGAINST WHICH THEPETmONISMADE :- The Petition is not filed against any particular Order or Orders of the Respondeats, she was appointed on 8.1.19881inthe Pay y-^^ T- T -^ XI-HC—78 tfl*<t1T ai*<i^ ^st -^wwi, ®-aly<i(o,i»<dl-L1Lj,< .^:£^.^.:...&5^^ S^V w^i sn^r sn R-ii* 'rWT 3TT^?T ^-(l^ J ^ ?^nwdfefart?i B.P. Rao, counse! forthi Mr. Awind Dubev, Panel La\ Learned counsel appearing the oresent the Detitioner mav b( detaiied representation before t| tearned counsel appearing for the Havina considered and witit merits of the case, in the ODinion served if iiberty is granted to representation raisng her grievan| of ths resoondents alona with a within a period of ohe month frorrl beina filed, the competent authoil the same on its own merit, in possibie preferablv within a peri receipt ofthe respresentation. With the aforesaid observatl ^T4f^)4h 'RR^ff ^f fS^t' <P*1^1< ^sifOTan^i petitioner. il/yer for the State/respondents. I'for the petitioner submits that for given an opportunity of filing the te competent authoritv, to which Btate has no'objection. |out expressing any opinion on the bf this Court. ends of iustice wiil be fie petitioner to make a detaiied ;es before the competent authority ;opy of the petition and this order, .todav and on such representation |ity of the respondents may decide ^ceordance with law, as eariy as of three months from the dats of oU on.the oetition stands disposed of. Sd/- Pritiaker Diwaker Judge 1+