IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 29TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 31810 of 2011(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- ABIN. T. MATHEW, S/O. LATE T. J. MATHEW THATTAMPARAMPIL HOUSE, CHEMALAMATTOM P.O., KANJIRAPPALLY, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686 529. BY ADV. SRI. P. K. ABOOBACKER (EDAPPALLY) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686 560. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686 560. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. T. A. SHAJI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PN WP(C).No. 31810 of 2011(A) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT. P1 COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 14.10.2011 FOR SCRUTINISING THE ANSWER PAPERS FOR THE SUBJECT SIGNALS & SYSTEMS. EXT. P2 COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DATED 14.10.2011 FOR SCRUTINISING THE ANSWER PAPERS FOR THE SUBJECT SIGNALS & SYSTEMS. EXT. P3 COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 14.10.2011 FOR REVALUING THE ANSWER PAPERS FOR THE SUBJECT SIGNALS & SYSTEMS. EXT. P4 COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DATED 14.10.2011 FOR REVALUING THE ANSWER PAPERS FOR THE SUBJECT SIGNALS & SYSTEMS. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL TRUE COPY/ P. A. TO JUDGE PN ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 31810 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Tech Degree Course. The petitioner had appeared for the 4th semester examination. When the result was declared, he had failed in the one paper. He applied for scrutiny and revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the scrutiny and revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the scrutiny of the answer paper within two weeks and the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for scrutiny and revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-