HIGH CQURTOF CHHATTISGARH: BIL^PUR WritPetition No. 4526 of 2004 Petitioner Vimal Kant Dubey, S/o. Stiri Shobha Ram Dubey, Aged about 51 years, R/o. Police Station Lormi, Tahsil Lormi, Distt. Bltaspur (CG). RespQndents Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Irrigatfon Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The Chief Engineer, Hasdeo Kachhar, Imgation Department, Bilaspur (CG). 3. The Superintendent Engineer (Administration), Office of Chief Engineer, Imgation [tepartment, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). 4. The Executive Engineer, Departmerrt, BHaspur, Di^t. BiSaspur (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of tndia.) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Ashish Surana, counse! for th^ peBtioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 1 day of August, 2008) With the consent of tearned counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is heard finally. 2) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petiBoner does not want to contest this matter, at Uiis stage. However, the petitfoner be granted liberty to make a representation with a direction to the respondent authorities to consider his representation, in accordance with law, on its own merit and pass appropriate order. 3) Ms. Smita Ghai, leamed Panei Lawyer appearing tor ttie respondents/State submite that if the representaiion is made, the same shaii be 2-— y ^S-:"A--^ ^v-a~'^'"si& ''•%. .^ "^ '%.'& ^Sk^ ,"v% V .Rajy considered, in accordance with law, on its own merit, as eariy as |»ssibie, preferabiy within a period of eight weete from the date of receipt of a copy of the representation. 4) In view of the foregoing, according to the teamed counset appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this matter. 5) Accordingiy, the petition is disposed of. Consequentt?, M.W.P.No.4863/2004 and I.A.No.9082/2004 also stan3 disposect of. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge o