IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.5501 of 2008 Date of Decision : September 01, 2011. Bhagwan Singh and others .....Petitioners versus The State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.C.M.Munjal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners seek quashing of Clause '2' of Advertisement dated 28.2.2008 (Annexure P-27) to the effect it considers only those candidates eligible for the posts of English Masters/Mistresses who have English as an elective subject in graduation. They further seek quashing of the merit list dated 26.3.2008 (Annexure P-28). During the course of hearing learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the controversy involved in this case stands settled by this Court vide order dated 11.8.2011 passed in CWP No.4379 of 2008 (Sukhpal Rani versus State of Punjab and another). CWP No.5501 of 2008 [2] The writ petition is accordingly allowed in terms of the afore- stated decision of this Court in Sukhpal Rani's case (supra). Dasti. September 01, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE