IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5120 of 2008 Tarkeshwar Pd.Agrawal, son of Sri Vanshi Sao, resident of village Deo, P.S.+Post Office- Deo, District- Aurangabad. ……….. Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar 2.Collector, Aurangabad 3.District Superintendent of Education, Aurangabad 4.Deputy Development Commissioner, Aurangabad 5.Block Development Officer, Deo, Aurangabad 6.Block Education Extension Officer, Deo, Aurangabad 7.Block Education Employment Committee, through B.E.O., Deo, Aurangabad 8.Headmaster, Rajkiya Madhya Vidyalaya, Panchkhaur, Deo, Aurangabad. ………. Respondents ----------- 2. 18/07/2011 Prayer of the petitioner in this writ application is confined for a direction to the respondents to pay him remuneration/ salary of the period he has actually worked as Block Teacher in the School. Appointment of the petitioner as Block Teacher has been cancelled from the date of his appointment itself on the basis of an enquiry in which it was found that he obtained the appointment by fraudulent means. Records show that show cause notice was issued to the petitioner and reply to the same was also filed, but it was not found satisfactory by the authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to show that the reports in respect of verification of the certificates 2 issued by the authorities of the concerned Institution are either factually wrong or any error of record has been committed. In the circumstances, this Court finds that the petitioner is not entitled for the salary of the period he has already worked in view of fraudulent appointment which he had obtained. This writ application is accordingly dismissed. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)