1 INTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 52 OF 2010 Shambhu Sharan Saxena ...Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Akhilesh Upadhyay for the Petitioner Mr. D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleader, for the Respondent/State Mr. A.A. Joshi with Mr. Roshan Pinto for Respondent No. 2 Ms. G.S. Joglekar for the Respondent/MGCM. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, AG. C.J., AND S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE: MAY 06, 2010 P. C.:- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that respondent No.2 earlier decided to construct a sky walk at J.N. Road, Mulund (West), but later on, rescinded its decision and cancelled the project. 2 3. The petitioner wants that the sky walk is constructed by the authorities. 4. We are of the view that the issue involved in this petition is for experts and technical bodies to decide, and this Court does not have the necessary authority, nor the expertise, to issue the direction as prayed. In such circumstances, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the State, as also the Metropolitan Mumbai Regional Development Authority. 5. Leaving such remedy open, this petition is dismissed. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.