WP(C) 988/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B. K. SHARMA Heard Mr. M. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. S. Samaria, learned Standing Counsel, Assam State Agricultural Marketing Board. Both the writ petitions are covered by the judgement and order dated 30. 3.2011 passed in WP(C) No. 918/2011. As in the said case, in the instant two wri t petitions also, the petitioners are posted at Khanamukh under GSMC. Having reg ard to the place of posting, which is Khanamukh under Kamrup (M), it has been he ld in the said decision that the petitioners involved in the said writ petition, whose home district is also Kamrup(M), his case is governed by the Election Com mission guidelines. As in the said case in the instant cases also, the residenti al address of both the petitioners is Kamrup(M) and their place of posting is a lso within Kamrup(M). Accordingly, the decision in the said writ petition shall govern the case of the petitioners. Consequently, the writ petitions are dismiss ed. Interim orders operating in both the writ petitions stand vacated. At this stage, Mr. M. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the written arguments submitted during the course of hearing of the writ p etitions, should be mentioned in the order. It is mentioned accordingly. In the written arguments, nothing new has been stated so as to persuade the Court to ta ke a different view in the matter than what has been observed in the said writ p etition i.e. WP(C) 918/2011, which was disposed of on 30.3.2011.