IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 22ND KARTHIKA 1931 RP.No. 993 of 2009() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN FAO.192/2007 DT. 23.7.2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): APPELLANT/2ND DEFENDANT ---------------------------- SAKKIR HUSSAIN,S/O.SAIDKKANNU, MARHABA, CHITTOOR ,PERINGAMMALA, REPRESENTED BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, BISNI,W/O.SAKKIR HUSSAIN, MARHABA, CHITTOOR PERINGAMMALA. BY ADV. SRI.M.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF & 1ST DEFENDANT -------------------- 1. K.SOBHANA KUMAR, KOLANIANGALATHU VEEDU, ANAD, NEDUMANGAD. 2. NIRMALA,D/O. GOMATHY, CHIRAG, T.C.2/6691(2) VALIYAVILA, VATTIYOORKAVU P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SMT.T.S.MAYA (THIYADIL) FOR R1 BY ADV. SMT.K.REENA FOR R1 BY ADV. SMT.K.G.BINDU FOR R2. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & P.BHAVADASAN ------------------------------- R.P.No.993 of 2009 in F.A.O.No.192 of 2007 ------------------------------- Dated this the 13th November, 2009 O R D E R Raman, J. This is a petition seeking review of the judgment in F.A.O.No.192 of 2007. The relief sought for in the review petition is to recall the observation made in the judgment in the penultimate paragraph regarding the 'possession of title'. As we have already observed in our judgment that the appeal itself is filed against an interim order passed by the court below and hence the court below shall dispose of the suit, untrammelled by the observation made in the judgment. Therefore, whatever observations made in the judgment will not affect either side, and the court below will deal with the matter independently. The review petition is closed subject to the above observation. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE nj.