IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1238 of 2011 ====================================================== Rekha Kumari @ Rekha Devi W/o Pranav Kumar, R/O Masjid Road Naugachhia, Ward No. 13(old), 16 (New), P.O. + P.S. and Block- Naugachhia, Distt.- Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner-Appellant Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. The Director, I.C.D.S, Bihar, Patna 3. The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur 4. The District Programme Officer, Naugachhia, Distt.- Bhagalpur 5. The Child Development Project Officer, Naugachhia, Distt.- Bhagalpur 6. The Block Development Officer, Naugachhia, Distt.- Bhagalpur 7. Rubbi Devi W/O Arvind Kumar Sah, R/O Masjid Road, Ward No. 13 (Old), 16 (New), Naugachhia, P.O. + P.S. and Block- Naugachhia, Distt.- Bhagalpur .... .... Respondents/Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant : Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Manoj Priyadarshi, S.C.-17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2. 19-09-2011 Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 12th July 2011 passed by the learned single Judge in the above C.W.J.C. No. 2330 of 2011, the writ petitioner has preferred the present Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. Patna High Court LPA No.1238 of 2011 (2) dt.19-09-2011 2 / 2 2 The matter at dispute is the cancellation of appointment of the appellant made as Anganbari Sevika. Admittedly, the appellant is the daughter-in-law of a licensee of Fair Price Shop. Under the Guidelines issued for selection of Anganbari Sevika and Anganbari Sahayika under the Integrated Child Development Scheme, such women who are related to the beneficiaries from State Government are specifically excluded from being selected for appointment as Anganbari Sevika and Anganbari Sahayika. The Guidelines suggest that women residing within the area having no other means of livelihood are selected for appointment as Anganbari Sevika and Anganbari Sahayika. The appellant is well settled, she could not have been appointed as Anganbari Sevika. No case for interference is made out. Appeal is dismissed in limine. Pawan/- (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)