IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No. 1892 of 2006 Date of decision : 13.11.2006. Harbans Singh .........Petitioner. Versus Jay Aar Trading Co ( Regd.) & Anr. ...........Respondents. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present : Mr.Surjit Singh Swaich,Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sham Lal Bhalla, Advocate for the respondent No.1. **** VINOD K. SHARMA,J.( ORAL ) The present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 10.3.2006 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Fatehgarh Sahib closing the evidence of the petitioner as he failed to complete the evidence in spite of availing three effective opportunities. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the interest of justice, the petitioner may be granted only one opportunity to lead his entire evidence. Without going into the merits of the case, I feel that interest of justice would be served if the petitioner is granted one opportunity to lead his entire evidence on payment of costs. Accordingly, the present revision is allowed, the impugned order is set aside and the petitioner is granted one C.R.No. 1892 of 2006 [2] last opportunity to lead his entire evidence on the date to be fixed by the trial Court at his own risk and responsibility. However, this shall be subject to payment of Rs. 5000/- as costs. 13.11.2006 ( VINOD K. SHARMA ) 'sp' JUDGE