IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 402 OF 2011 VILLAGE PANCHAYAT OF CHICALIM THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, V P. GHAR AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus SHRI PEDRO BARBOSA ... Respondent Mr. Zeller D'souza, Advocate for the petitioners. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 11th July, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. D'Souza, learned Counsel for the petitioners. 2. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge the order dated 29th April, 2011 passed by the Ad hoc District Judge-2 FTC-II, South Goa at Margao in Regular Civil Appeal No.24/2011 by which the petitioners' application seeking relief to urge additional grounds in support of an appeal preferred by the petitioners has been dismissed. 3. Having heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and having perused the record, I find that this is not a fit case in which jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India deserves to be exercised against the impugned order. It is well settled that jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, must be exercised in exceptional circumstances. Therefore, no interference is warranted with the impugned order. However, the petitioners are at liberty to urge the grounds in support of their appeal arising out of the pleadings and the evidence led by the parties. 4. With these observations, the petition stands dismissed. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA