IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.852 of 2008 DR. ARUN KUMAR SINHA & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & anr. ----------- For the petitioners: Mr. Pramod Kr. Singh, Advocate For the respondent no.2: Mr. Vivekanand Vivek, Advocate 4 27/4/2009 A complaint was filed before the Chief Judicial Magistrate alleging against the petitioners that while the son of the complainant was working as a driver of the petitioners he went missing. When the complainant went to the house of the petitioners to enquire about his son he was pushed out from the house and then he doubted that his son might have been killed and his body disposed of. On the basis of above, a First Information Report was registered and cognizance was taken. Against the cognizance a revision was filed before the Court of Sessions Judge but the same dismissed. Against that the present writ petition has been filed for quashing the revisional order as well as the order of the Magistrate taking cognizance. Having perused the order of the revisional court as well as other materials on record, I am of the 2 view that there is sufficient material on record to take cognizance of the offence. It cannot be said at this stage that no prosecution case is made out against them. The defence of the petitioners is to be considered at the appropriate stage. In the circumstances, no case for interference with the order of the revisional court is made out and, accordingly, the present application is dismissed. Neyaz/ (J. B. Koshy, CJ.)