HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8227 of 2010 Dated: 02-08-2010 Between: Navari Yetta Reddy. … Petitioner And The Joint Collector-I, R.R. District & others. … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8227 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed, questioning the Memo, dated 19.03.2010, issued in F2/942/2010, by the 1st respondent-Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District. The impugned memo is issued on the appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 90 of the A.P. (T.A) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. In the said memo, it is stated that the petitioner has not filed any appeal against the orders, by which, he is aggrieved, but merely filed an appeal against the Memo, dated 03.06.2009. I have also perused the grounds of appeal filed under Section 90 of the A.P. (T.A) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 and the Memo, dated 03.06.2009, issued in CC/579/2009. From the memorandum of grounds, it is clear that the petitioner has filed the appeal only against Memo, dated 03.06.2009 issued in CC/579/2009, by the Tahsildar, Maheswaram Mandal, intimating that certain certified copies asked by the petitioner cannot be given, as the said record is not available, as much as it relates to 40 years back. Under Section 90 of the A.P. (T.A) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950, though an appeal is provided against the order passed by the Tahsildar in exercise of original jurisdiction under the scheme of the Act, but the petitioner has not filed any appeal against the order passed by the Tahsildar. This appeal itself is filed against the Memo, dated 03.06.2009, which merely intimates about non-availability of certain records so as to issue certified copies to the petitioner. In that view of the matter, I do not find any illegality in the impugned Memo, rejecting the appeal of the petitioner in limine. If the certified copies are not furnished, it is always open for the petitioner to file appropriate application seeking to dispense with filing of copies of such orders assailed in the appeal, but he cannot maintain any appeal against the Memo, dated 03.06.2009. Keeping it open to the petitioner to file an appeal against the orders, of which, he is aggrieved, along with an appropriate application seeking to dispense with filing of certified copies of such orders, this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 2nd August 2010 ajr