IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 13530 of 2010 Between: E.Praveen Yadav and others ..... PETITIONERS AND The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Commissioner, Tankbund Road, Hydeabad and others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 13530 OF 2010 O R D E R : This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the order dated 01.06.2010 passed by the 1st respondent rejecting the request of the petitioners for regularisation of the constructions in premises bearing No.9-4-187 and 190 situated at Rezimental Bazar, Secunderabad and also directing removal of the said constructions within three days, is arbitrary and illegal. I have heard the learned counsel for both the parties. So far as the rejection of the petitioners’ request for regularisation is concerned, it is not disputed before this Court that a remedy of appeal is available under Rule 11 of the Andhra Pradesh Regulation and Penalization of Unauthorizedly Constructed Buildings and Building Constructed in Deviation of the Sanctioned Plane, Rules, 2007. In the circumstances, the petitioners are granted liberty to avail the said remedy. So far as the demolition of the structures is concerned, even assuming that the structures in question are liable to be removed, the 1st respondent is bound to issue a final notice as contemplated under Section 636 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955. Since no such notice is issued, the impugned order to the extent of direction for removal of the structures in question is concerned is hereby set aside and the Writ Petition is disposed of leaving it open to the respondents to pass appropriate orders afresh following due process of law. No costs. ​ ____________ Date: 22.06.2010 G. ROHINI, J Ivd