IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 1236 of 2007 Smt. Mohni Sethi & another. ……… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. ……… Respondents Mr. M.K. Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, A.G.A for respondent nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate for respondent no. 4. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. M.K. Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, A.G.A for respondent nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate for respondent no. 4. 2. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, A.G.A. submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted the chargesheet against petitioner no. 2 before the Circle Officer concerned on 16.01.2008 whereas no prima facie evidence has been collected against petitioner no. 1, as such he has not been chargesheeted and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit the chargesheet against petitioner no. 2 before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the short counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 05.12.2007 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 24.11.2008 V.K.