FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CA/11291/2009 SANGITA V/S VENKAT WITH CA/2107/2010 CHAYABAI V/S VENKAT ... 1. These Civil Applications are filed by the purchasers of Survey No.58 from the original plaintiffs. They seek their addition as party- respondents in the appeal on the count that their interest is also involved in the present lis and revenue authorities are not mutating their names in the revenue record due to pendency of the present proceeding. 2. Shri Chillarge, learned Advocate submits that the present appeal is restricted only in respect of land S.No.187/B and not S.No. 58 as contended by the applicants. In this view of the matter, the applicants cannot claim any right to get impleaded as party-respondent in the present appeal. 3. In the result, Civil Applications are rejected. No order as to costs. Dt.11.3.2011 (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.) akl