IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-A 223-MA of 2011 Date of decision: 17.5.2011 State of Haryana …..Appellant vs. Nafe Singh and ors …..Respondents CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: - Mr. S.S. Goripuria, DAG, Haryana HEMANT GUPTA, J State is in appeal aggrieved against the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jhajjar on 11.10.2010 acquitting the accused for an offence under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 307, 506 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned trial Court has, inter alia, found that the injuries suffered by the accused Udai and Lila have not been explained by the prosecution and that the complainant have conveniently concealed the said fact. It has also been found that the victims namely Saroj, Basanti and Manju of the alleged occurrence have not been examined. The Court has also found that in fact the dispute between the parties is of a civil nature as the complainant and the accused belong to the same family. CRM-A No. 223-MA of 2011 In view of the said fact, we find that the reasoning given by learned trial Court cannot be said to be perverse which may warrant any interference in an appeal against acquittal. Dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 17.5.2011 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) preeti JUDGE 2