FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. CONTINUATION SHEET No. CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE. SIDE. SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 411 OF APPLICATION NO. 411 OF APPLICATION NO. 411 OF 2005. IN IN IN CRIMINL CRIMINL CRIMINL APPEAL NO. 53 OF 2005 . APPEAL NO. 53 OF 2005 . APPEAL NO. 53 OF 2005 . Ralapalli Mohan. ... Aplicant. vs. C.B.I, A.C.B., Mumbai & ors..... Respondents. ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders appearnaces,Courts’s : orders or directions : and Registrar’s orders. : ------------------------------------------------------------ Shri Rajendra Shirodkar for the applicant. Shri Ejaz Khan, Spl.P.P for C.B.I. Shri D.P.Adsule, A.P.P.for the State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.M.KANADE,J. V.M.KANADE,J. V.M.KANADE,J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 2-2-2005. 2-2-2005. 2-2-2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant, Shri Ejaz Khan, Spl.P.P. for C.B.I. and Shri Adsule, A.P.P.for the State. 2. The applicant seeks direction from this Court that the C.B.I. be directed to return his passport which was surrendered to them on 24.4.2001. The applicant is convicted by the trial Court for having committed an offence punishable under section 120-B read with section 420 and section 409 of the Indian Penal Code and also under section 13(2) read with section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act,1988. He is sentenced to undergo R.I. for one year. Appeal is admitted. 3. In my view, there is no reason why the said passport which was handed over to the C.B.I. on 24.4.2001, should not be returned to the applicant. Accordingly, the respondents are directed to return the passport to the applicant, by tomorrow. 4. Respondents to act on authenticated copy of this order. ---