// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.4870/2008 Natwar Lal Vyas @ Nattu Son of late Shri Bihari Lal Versus Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and Another Date of Order ::: 10.12.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri B.C. Rawat, Counsel for appellant #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the appellant. The injured-appellant has preferred this appeal for enhancement of the amount of compensation in respect of injuries sustained by him in a motor-accident took place on 30th November, 1999 and being aggrieved with the impugned Award dated 17th June, 2006 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal & Additional District & Sessions Judge No.9, Jaipur City, Jaipur, in Claim Case No.118/2004 (109/2000), whereby the learned Tribunal awarded total compensation of Rs.10,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the claim application i.e. 18th February, 2000 up-to the date of payment, in his favour. The submission of the learned counsel // 2 // for the appellant is that the Tribunal committed an illegality in not awarding any amount of compensation in respect of medical bills and for physical pain and mental agony, therefore, the impugned Award passed by the Tribunal is liable to be modified and the amount of compensation is also liable to be enhanced. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the appellant in the light of the finding of the learned Tribunal. During the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the appellant could not point out as to which medical-bill was produced by him, of which claim has not been allowed by the learned Tribunal. The learned Tribunal has observed that the appellant sustained ten injuries, as per the injury-report (Exhibit-1); the injuries No.2, 3 and 4 were referred for X- ray advise but admittedly the X-ray report was not placed on the record. Therefore, the Tribunal treated all the ten injuries as simple in nature and accordingly awarded compensation of Rs.10,000/- for simple injuries. In view of the fact that no medical-bill has been produced and got exhibited in the case, the learned Tribunal was justified in not awarding any amount of compensation in this regard. In view // 3 // of the fact that the appellant sustained only simple injuries, I do not find any illegality in not awarding any amount of compensation for physical pain and mental agony. The amount of compensation awarded in the present case appears to be just, fair and reasonable, and no interference in it is called for. In view of the above discussions, I do not find any merit in this appeal and the same is accordingly dismissed in limine. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//