IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Review Application No. 199-CII of 2010(O&M) in Civil Revision No. 1678 OF 2010 Date of decision:9th December, 2010 Seth Pal and another .......Petitioners Versus Ram Chander and others ........Respondents BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?Yes/No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No ALOK SINGH, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that since the suit has already been decided by the Trial Court, hence present application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the applicant to raise all the points available under the law before the Appellate Court. Dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. [ALOK SINGH] JUDGE 9th December, 2010 Shivani Kaushik