Eye/1‘9 @@ MSlngie uench m4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF IUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION NO. 4623 0004 / PETITIO R R Barhai S/o Late Raj Singh Barhal VV aged about 38 years S D O Forest Kelhan Forest Clrcle Manendragarh R/o ward no.17 b fits aagzraizxagaazzeais“, ¢V§§¢ \ 6% at 9 §é VERSUS /I) State of Chhattisgarh , Through: The Secretary Department of Forest Mantralaya,D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) /, 2) The Pricipal, Chief Conservator of forest Raipur(C.G.) 3) Conservator of forest, we? // Ambikapur, Distt-Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. XLHC 78 331W, m, L3? b\ Q3? E7 m 200 ..... . mm (Wu) *simm mmm WW wm W094 Shti Bhupendra Singh, counsei for the petitioner. Shri Sudhir Agrawal, Panel Lav [yer for the State. Application for urgent hearing i2; allawed. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter relates to transfer» of the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner has been transferred from Kelhari, Forest le, Manendragarh, District Koria to Badalkhol, District Jashpur, vide 0rd r dated 4-1 1-2004 (Annexure-P/7). He also submits that the petitioner ls se ‘ously ill and in this regard he has tiled documents. He also submits that th petitioner has been transferred during mid session. He also submits that fo the present the petitioner may be given an opportunity of tiling the detai representation before the competent authority of the respondents, whioh hall be considered on its own merits in accordance with law. Having considered and witho t expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. in the opinion of this urt’, ends of justice will be sewed if a direction is given to the petitioner make a detailed representation raising his grievances before the competent authority of the respondents along with a copy of the petition and this der, within 15 days, and on such representation being filed, the co ent authority of the respondents shall decide the~same on its own mer in accordance with law as early as possible preferably within. two mo ths from the date of receipt of the representation. C c l J ’ r m t i XI-HC—-78 WW,WWW \J M‘Lrxzj Wm 200 311%?!m (Wu) WWIW am 31m!m mm m / 2 / mmeiwm a? w 31ml Learned counsel for the petltl er submits that the petmoner has not been relieved. He prays that the petiti er may be allowed to continue. It is directed that if the petiti ner has not been relieved and other person has not joined in place of the etitioner, the petitioner may be allowed to continue till the representation is decided. It is made clear that if the petitioner has already been relieved or other person has already joined in place of the petitioner, this order wlll ot entitle the petitioner to rejoin at the earlier place of posting. With the aforesaid observation, his petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.W.P;No.49 04 and LAW disposed of. Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge Gowri