IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 29TH AUGUST 2011 / 7TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23391 of 2011(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.K.HANEEFA, S/O.KABEER RAWTHER, R/A.PALLAM,MUTHALAMADA, CHITTUR TALUK PALAKKAD DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN SMT.P.G.BABITHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD-678001 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MUTHALAMADA VILLAGE, MUTHALAMADA,PALAKKAD-678507 3. LOCAL LEVEL MOINTORING COMMITTEE CONSTITUTED UNDER SECTION 5 OF ACT 28 OF 2008 REP.BY ITS CONVENER,THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER KRISHI BHAVAN, MUTHALAMADA P.O.,PALAKKAD DIST- PIN-678507 SR GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 23391 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO.2660 OF 2000 OF SRO KOLLENGODE EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 25.6.2010 EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).29976 OF 2010 EXT.P4- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 17.8.2010 EXT.P5- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXT.P6- TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER EXT.P7- TRUE COPY OF THE LAND IDENTIFICATION DETAILS PREPARED BY THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER EXT.P8- TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF PETITIONER'S PROPERTY (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).23391/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 29th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT The only relief sought for in the writ petition is a direction for consideration of Ext.P5 application made by the petitioner in Form No.2 under Section 5 of Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008 (Act 28 of 2008). 2. If as stated by the petitioner, Ext.P5 application is received and is pending, it is directed that same will be considered in accordance with the provisions of Act 28 of 2008 and orders thereon will be passed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs