IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1732 of 2009 1. RAM BILASH SAH,son of late Bataha Sah 2. Horil Sah,son of Paremeshwar Sah 3. Balmiki Sah,son of Ramdeo Sah 4. Ram Sagar Sah,son of Ramdeo Sah 5. Raghubir Sah,son of Ram Bilash Sah. All residents of village Siropatti,P.S.-Warisnagar,Dist.- Samastipur .. Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Ram Briksha Ram,son of Sukhdeo Ram, resident of village-Siropatti,P.S.- Warisnagar,District-Samastipur .. .. .. Opp.Parties ----------- For the Petitioners : M/s Ashutosh Kumar & Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocates For the State : Mr.Gopesh Kumar,APP --------- 03/ 16-11-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. This revision application has been filed against the judgment dated 24-07-2009 passed by the Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Samastipur in Cr.Appeal No.112 of 1986, by which he has dismissed the appeal with some alteration affirming the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30-05-1986 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Samastipur in G.R.No.1080 of 1982, Tr.No.92 of 1986, by which petitioner Ram Bilash Sah and Ram Sagar Sah each are sentenced to undergo 2 years rigorous imprisonment under Section 148 of the Penal Code and 2 years rigorous imprisonment under Section 324 of the Penal Code. Petitioner Raghubir Sah is sentenced to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment under Section 147 of the Penal Code and six months rigorous imprisonment under Section 323 of the Penal Code and rest of the 2 petitioners are sentenced to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment under Section 147 of the Penal Code. All the sentences are directed to run concurrently. It is said that parties are agnates. Dispute was for a passage through cow shed which is reconciled after resolving all the differences. So, compromise was filed in the appellate court itself. Incident is of the year 1982, even then no lenient view has been taken by the appellate court on the point of sentence while they remained in custody for considerable days during trial and now here also they are in custody since 03.11.2009. In my view also that can be observed sufficient towards sentences. Accordingly, this revision application is partly allowed on the point of sentence which is reduced to the period undergone while conviction is affirmed. As the petitioners (1)Ram Bilash Sah, (2)Horil Sah, (3)Balmiki Sah, (4)Ram Sagar Sah and (5)Raghubir Sah are in jail, they are directed to be released forthwith, if not required in any other case. Let the order be communicated through fax at the cost of the petitioners. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )