1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 1263/2007 with Writ Petition No. 1264/2007 M/s. Banerjee Brothers through its Managing Partner ..vs.. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. through its Executive Engineer (O. & M.) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 7 th April, 2008 1. Heard Mr. Parsodkar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Moharir, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The trial Court, by the impugned order rejected the petitioner's application for directions to the respondent to produce Electric Meter so also the entries recorded by the Meter Reader. The trial court rejected the petitioner's application on the ground that the issues are framed long back and, thereafter, the present application is preferred by the petitioner, belatedly. The trial Court also observed that it is for the plaintiff to prove suit claim by producing the cogent and reliable evidence. 2 3. I to not find any error in the above observations made by the trial Court. Be that as it may, Mr. Moharir, learned counsel for the respondent makes statement that the Consumer Personal Leger is already filed on the record and he undertakes to give copy of the same to the petitioner. 4. In view of this statement and undertaking by Mr.Moharir, learned counsel for the respondent, I am of the opinion that there is no need to interfere in the impugned order in my jurisdiction under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The writ petitions are, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE kahale