•w IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (St NO.llA^S OF 2009 PETITIONER :^ss^ -..••" ^" :..^Ar^-~ ..--•" 9.r'' Saraspati Ratiya, S/o R.L. Ratiya, aged about 40 years, presently posted and working as Patwari, Patwari Halka No.4, Raigarh, Tahsil & District Raigarh (CG). Versus RESPONDENTS ^f'' ^^s^ti' State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Revnue, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, (CG). Collector Raigarh, (CG). (Land District Record), Raigarh Deputy Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^o^ 3^V W W\* Wd 311^1 »il'n 'TSET '<<|A|i<n<i, ®Ti]'(i'is,(qMiyy ^^.....\^..ff..C^.l...^ly•^a 3ii^iTxrasR ('yf^'^i) •S^nwHteTaii^i SB : HON'BLE SHR! JUSTICE PRhTINKER DIWAKBR 13.S.2QQ9 Shri B.D.Guru, counsel for Shri Sumesh Bajaj, G.A. fo| Chailenge in the presentl 30.6.2009 passed by the respondef is working as Patwari has been trt Raigarh to Patwari Halka No. 33, Contention of the petitioneit petitioner was posted as Patwari with other officers was attacked were murdered. He submits thatj apprehension that his life may not been transferred. Counsel for the State grievance he can file suitable reij No. 1 and the same would be Accordingly, the petition is petitioner to file representation b^ period of seven days and the sam^ period of ten days from the date ol] the petitioner. t- the State. petition is to the order dated nt No.3 bywhich the petitioner who r^nsferred trom Patwari Haika No.4, Qaramkela, district Raigarh. is that in the year 2003 when the a^. Halka No. 19, Sarangarh he alonj abd in the said incident two ofncers the petitioner is having a stron^ be safe at Baramkeia where he has subhi consilien =hllfcf41-l Ml^cff 'i| fetzt <r«1ti;lt ^RaiRn sn^i Tiits that if the petitioner has any iresentation before the respondent id in accordance with law. disposed of with a direction to the :fore the respondent No. 1 within a would be decided within a turther its receipt. Pritinker Diwaker Judge