IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14799 of 2009 1. SMT. URMILA MEHTARANI W/O VILASH MEHTAR VILL- SITAMARHI COURT BAZAR, BALUPER PANI TANKI, WARD NO. 13, P.S.SITAMARHI, DISTT. SITAMARHI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COLLECTOR SITAMARHI, P.S. & DISTT. SITAMARHI 2. EXECUTIVE OFFICER NAGAR PARISHAD, SITAMARHI, P.S. & DISTT. SITAMARHI ----------- 5. 13.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner is a Class-IV employee serving in the Nagar Parishad, Sitamarhi. She is aggrieved by the order bearing Letter No. 257 dated 27.6.2009, Annexure-3, whereunder she has been directed to superannuate with effect from 30.6.2009 on attaining the age of 60 years. Petitioner is disputing the contents of the said order as according to her she is not to attain the age of 60 years on 30.6.2009 and in support of such fact she is relying on her representation dated 13.7.2009, Annexure-4 as also on the service-book itself wherefrom it will appear that she is not to attain the age of 60 years on 30.6.2009. Having appreciated the aforesaid submissions made on behalf of the petitioner on 6.11.2009 this Court called upon Sri Bishwa Bibhuti Kumar Singh, Advocate to contact the Executive Officer of Sitamarhi Nagar Parishad and to obtain the service-book of the petitioner so that the submission made on behalf of the petitioner and noted above can be verified by this Court. Today as also yesterday none appeared on behalf of the Sitamarhi Nagar Parishad. In the circumstances, this Court has no option but to dispose of this matter without the assistance of the submission of the counsel for the Sitamarhi Nagar Parishad. 3. Accordingly, it is directed that petitioner should file a representation annexing a copy of this order highlighting the submission which has been noted in this order and in the representation dated 13.7.2009, Annexure-4 which should be considered by the Chief Executive Officer of the - 2 - Sitamarhi Nagar Parishad who should pass a reasoned order dealing with each of the submissions noted above within a reasonable time, in any case within one month from the date of receipt of the representation. In the event it is found that petitioner had not attained the age of 60 years on 30.6.2009 then she be reinstated as Class-IV employee in the Sitamarhi Nagar Parishad until she attains the age of 60 years with back wages. 4. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)