Petitionar IN THE HIGH CQURT QF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH BILA PUR WPNU é “#1205 Santosh Kumar Tadas S/G Late shn‘ Pamajz‘ Tadas Agsd aboui 33 years, R/o Bhagat Singh Ward, Ward No. 17, Near High Schaal Dongargarh, Dist : Rajnandgaon (Dist : Durg as mentioned in the impugned order) Resnondenf Smt Tara Tadas fL/ W/o Shrl Santosh Tadas, Aged about 3O years, Indraprast Nagar (Fauji Nagar} M.P.H0using Board, Bhilai 26) Dist : Durg~(C.G.} / WRIT PETITLON U/A 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA M / Xl-HCv78 (g ..... §m$......&...2§i§é2;. ....... E2605 I] snéamméwfm ammam mmW 311w mm#%w aSWWw ‘ ‘ 23—9~2005 Mn PrafuH Bhara‘f, counsal Mr. U'H'am Pundey, counsel Heard bofin +he counsel. The péTiTioner has preferg of fhe Cons-H‘rufion of ‘India‘ ‘ correcfness m5 the, crder dafed Di'sfrim" Judge, ‘Durg in Civi! Addi'i'ionoi Dis'fric'r iuége whik fiied under Sedion 24 of The Hi mainfemncg of R5.1,5OG/— per mg as far The imgafion expenses >Howevar‘, inferim mainfenance hi +he eariwirig of The §éfifionen T per- monfh which he is receiving The +riai working under fhe said frusf and ‘Hnere is no o‘i'her' incame' Court has imiuded income of Th a‘so fhe agricuhumi income, whe L On “ride ofheri hand, Mr. Uf‘i’am Pandey‘ learned ccunsei for ihe respoknden? submiTT‘ed Thai ave zm‘ has. been made ThaT fhe pei‘h‘ianzr' apar'r from working in +he Trusf is aiso working wi‘Hn his brofher in Kirana for fhe pe‘i‘i?iorxer. for The respondent e pefi'rianer from his brofher‘e shop as fhere is rm such procf on *ha fiie. \ \ ‘ \ , . 3m W5 (Wm) 'ed This wri‘r pefifion under Ar'ricie 227 wesfigning fhg iegaiifyi proprie‘ry and 3-1«2005 pagsed by fhe 7m Addi‘rianai Euii' No.223-A/2004, whereby iearnad i aiiowing fhe respondenf‘s appiica‘rion hdu Marriage Act 1955, grained in‘ierim nfh and R3.3,QOG/- iifigé‘i'ian expensas. Mr. Prafuii Bham'i') ienrneij counsei for ihe pz’fifianer argued +ha'i' are concerned, i'm has ne’ ahjecTion. 1s nn'i baen gran'l'ed cammensura‘i‘e wi'i'h he pefii'ioner's income is only Rs.1,290/— from Mae Bamieshwuri Trust, us he is Xl-HC-78 ‘mamias wv.6. ’ mzoog anéarm (Wm) mmirwm 3i 31% met wig-«ma anésT A 2"». _ L General Merchandise shog, and from fhere he is earning around abou‘r Rs.2,000/- per mom‘h and he is ulso gafi'ing mcome from his amesTars ‘propzri‘y; 'H’Iz agriculfura. Having heard iearned coun szl for fhe par+ies and having pzrused ' The documenTs and pleadings of pe‘l‘ifioner' is ge‘rfing saiary of Rs 1,290/- per mcn‘l'h from thz Trusf and ' he is glso '\gef+ing some income The parfies, i1- is esmblished ThaT The from his brm‘her‘s Merchandi$e shop, where mihe is working. IT hus noT beeh specificaiiy denied by 'rhe pe+i+ioner herein Thai There is io agricui'i‘umi income, as such! in ine . facfs and circumsfances of fhe c s2, i amof The considsred opinicn Thai in: interim main‘ienqnca qmouni’ cf R$.1,QOO/— pgr man'i'h is jusi and proper looking in ‘i'hz income 01" pefi‘i'ianer. In The resuiT, The peTiTion is aiiowed and The monfhiy main‘renanca aiiawance is madified fa Rs.1,0 0/; per manfh from Rs.1,EGG/a per monih. i Inlview of ihis ordar, M.("‘V.)P.No.547/2005 & I.A.No.2516f2005 siond disposed of; , Por'ries are enTiTied for ceriified copy of This order. Sd/- L.C.BHAD00 Judge i