THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1230 of 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by defendant No.1 in O.S.No.318 of 2008, against order, dated 21.02.2011, passed by the Court below in I.A.No.34 of 2011 filed under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC seeking to appoint Advocate Commissioner to examine him as a witness. The Court below by the impugned order rejected I.A.No.34 of 2011 stating that though the petitioner herein was shown as a plaintiff, as the matter is coming up for defendant side evidence, there are no grounds to appoint Advocate Commissioner to examine him as a witness. I have also perused the affidavit filed in support of I.A.No.34 of 2011. In the affidavit itself, the petitioner herein seeks appointment of Advocate Commissioner to record his evidence in the Bar Association Room. When the petitioner came to the Bar Association Room, he can as well attend to the Court for his cross-examination. In that view of the matter, I do not find any merit in this Civil Revision Petition for grant of relief as prayed for. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 11th APRIL, 2011. kvni