IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9112 of 2010 1. FULMANI DEVI W/O JHATHA MARANDI, D/O LATE SUKAL MURMU @ SUFAL MURMU R/O VILL.- AMNAHA, P.S. MIRGANJ (DHAMDAHA), DISTT.- PURNEA 2. SIRU MURMU S/O LATE SUKUL MURMU @ SUFAL MURMU R/O VILL.- AMNAHA, P.S. MIRGANJ (DHAMDAHA), DISTT.- PURNEA – Petitioners. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH COLLECTOR, PURNEA 2. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF LAND REFORMS DHAMDAHA, DISTT.- PURNEA 3. RATAN DEO CHAUDHARY S/O LATE MEDNI CHAUDHARY R/O VILL.- DAMAILY, P.S. MIRGANJ (DHAMDAHA), DISTT.- PURNIA – Respondents. ----------- 2 25.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Earlier Bataidari Case Nos. 16/2001-02 and 17/2001-02 were filed which were dismissed. No appeal was filed against the order of dismissal and the order attained finality. An application has been filed under section 48E of the Bihar Tenancy Act by the present petitioners claiming that the private respondent came on a bi-cycle and threatened him and as such it is submitted that fresh cause of action arose for filing of the writ petition. In view of the aforesaid facts I do not see any illegality in the reasonings given by the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Dhamdaha, Purnea. This writ petition is dismissed. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)