Rx CHHATTISGARH yRIT PETITION NOX¢ag OF 20g PETITIONER: Gadadhar Gupta S/O Tularam Gupta, Aged aikpgy,”§) ' "_;..-"(§.:... V ”r? . ’ I Teacher Presently'posted 1n the about Pnmary agd working 58 School, years, as w I V 7 Creww \cx . w Bhulamuda, Block Baramkela, ?_ a ‘ ..a(‘A:‘ " DismaRaigarh(C.G.). Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG). Block Education Officer, Baramkela, District (C.G.). ' Raigarh “i L’VRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE K CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ?‘._..‘, .0. "vat; ‘3‘“ Versus R RESPONDENTS: I. State of Chhattisgarh, . Through Its Secretary, Department of School Education, Raipur D.K,S. (C.G.). Building, 1‘ Mantralaya, 2. Director, , t)” Public Instructions, Pill Raipur Directorate, (C.G.). Chhattisgarh r State, 3. Collector, Raigarh, 4. District Raigarh (CG). District Education Officer, ,‘ v..- XI—HC—ZZ Wm Wwmwmmg/xéoéyw mm WW Www‘i wm wawqm r». 26—8—1004 On a mention being mads, this ca Patitioner/s by Shxi H . 5‘ P¢€Q State by Shri V.V‘S‘ Munhy, I Dy.G.A, and Elm Akhil Agrawal and Shl Heard. Hie matter relatcs to transfer of t} Counsel for the petitionerx's subm effected illegally in contravention of law a State counsel submitted that tha withou: serving notice for demand ofjusti Having heard and considercd tr opinion on the merits of the casa in the served if a direction is given to the petir. his/her grievances and grounds before thi respondents along with a copy of the peti‘ representation being filed, the State Gove under tit» iii? Thzll considr: "td decide law as early as possible preferably Within of the representation. If any contravent notice the same be considered on its own Counsel for the petitioner/'5 prays any grievance of the petitioner's rem/aim available under the law. lt is open to the pi law, With the aforesaid observations, ti Consequently NLWTK if any, alst Certified copy as per rules. Copy to State counsel for complia l se is taken up. 21, Ilolvvccdkt )y. Advocate General: with Shri Satish Gupta, i Sandeep Dubey, Panel Lawyers .e petitioner from the respective place. Ltted that the transfer of the petitioner/s has been ind policy. State counsel opposed it, petitioner/s has straightway filed the petition be and representation. he rival contentions. Without expressing any opinion of this C’iort, ends of justice will be lonert's to make detailed representation raising 2 State Government/competent authority 0t" the ion and this order. Within 10 days‘ and on such mient/comp'etent authority of the respondents. :he same on its own merits in accordance with six weeks from the date of receipt/production rion of policy or guidelines is brought to the nerits. that after the decision of the reoresentaiion if dv . hei'she mav be allowed to avail the reme etitioner to avail the remedy available under the iis petition stands disposed of. ‘i stands disposed of. ‘ Sdl— - ‘Fakh ruddin Judge he.