IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2222 of 2009 MADAN MOHAN ROY CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 13.2.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. The grievance of the petitioner as with regard to non-payment of leave encashment for the present does not seem to be unreasonable unless the respondents are in a position to justify their stand for non-payment. The communication of the Accountant General in fact would go to show that the petitioner is entitled for such payment provided an authorization to this effect is issued by the Director of Science and Technology. Therefore, there is nothing to adjudicate at this stage and the petitioner is accordingly directed to approach the Director of Science and Technology by filing a fresh representation and in the event such a representation is filed, the Director of Science and Technology would be under obligation to pass a final order within a period of one month of its filing. 2 With the aforementioned observation, this application is disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/