IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1368 of 2005 (S/S) Yugal Kishore, S/O Sri Kushi Ram, Presently working as Typist- cum-clerk (Junior Clerk) Nainital Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Lalkuwan, Distt.- Nainital. …… Petitioner. Versus 1. Director, Dairy Development, Uttaranchal Haldwani (Nainital), Govt. of Uttaranchal, Dehradun. 2. General Manager Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Ltd. Lalkauwn (Nainital). 3. Sri Ashok Kumar Singh, 4. Smt. Lata Joshi, Both working as Senior Clerk Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Lalkuwan (Nainital). … Respondents. Mr. P.C.Bisht, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K.C.Tiwari, Brief Holder for the State-respondent no.1. Mr. V.B.S.Negi, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondents No.2. Date July 13, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the promotion orders of respondent no. 3 and 4 as senior clerks as per letter no. 15-6-2004 (Annexure-6) and dated 24-2-2005 (Annexure-7) issued by the respondents. Further prayer for mandamus commanding the respondent nos. 1 and 2 to promote the petitioner as Senior Clerk has also been made. From a perusal of the supplementary counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no. 2 shows that in paragraph no. 2 the following averments have been made:- “2. That as per new staffing pattern three post of Senior Clerk are sanctioned under Nainital Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited, Nainital and one post of Senior Clerk is 2 vacant. The petitioner can be considered against the vacant post of Senior Clerk under the reserved category.” The grievance raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner in this writ petition is that the petitioner be considered for promotion to the post of Senior Clerk. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 has urged that the proposal is being sent for consideration of the name of the petitioner for promotion to the post of senior clerk. In the course of arguments learned counsel for the respondent no.2 has shown the proposal dated 6-5-2010 sent by the respondent No. 2 to the Managing Director/Registrar, Uttarakhand Sahkari Dairy Federation Ltd. Wherein as many as 19 employees including the petitioner (at serial no. 13 of the list) are to be considered for promotion under the staffing pattern. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, at this stage the writ petition is disposed of on the ground that since the proposal has already been sent for promotion of the petitioner by the authority concerned. If the petitioner feels aggrieved after the decision is taken by the competent authority, the petitioner may file a fresh writ petition thereafter. ( B.S.Verma, J. ) RCP