Civil Revision No. 1667 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1667 of 2010 Date of Decision: March 11,2010 Sushil Kumar .....Petitioner versus Vishnu and others ....... Respondents Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present: Mr. Jainainder Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Ajay Tewari, J. This petition has been filed against an order closing the evidence of the petitioner-plaintiff. Learned counsel has argued that no doubt five opportunities were granted to the petitioner but it took time for the petitioner to collect all the revenue record since it is lying in two Tehsils. Further states that now the entire record is available with the petitioner and he will lead his entire evidence on the next date fixed viz.13.03.2010. Further states that in case the petitioner leads his entire evidence on 13.03.2010 (which is the first date for the defendants to lead their evidence) and thereafter the defendants lead their evidence, no prejudice would be caused to them. Civil Revision No. 1667 of 2010 2 In my opinion it would be in the interest of justice to permit the petitioner to lead his entire evidence at his own responsibility on 13.03.2010 and thereafter the respondents lead their evidence. It is made clear that no further opportunity will be granted to the petitioner for this purpose. The revision petition is allowed in the above terms. A copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for the petitioner under the signatures of the Court Secretary. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE March 11, 2010 sunita