IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.4117 -M of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : FEBRUARY 16, 2010 MUKESH SARDA ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. KS Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Ashima Mor, Advocate, for respondent. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner apprehends that he would be arrested in a case registered under Section 406/498-A, Indian Penal Code. There is a matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and Anu Sharda. Learned counsel for the respondent-State contends that, as of now, the petitioner is not required to be arrested in any case. In view of the statement given on behalf of the respondents, the petition is disposed of. February 16, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?