SBCWP NO.1552/08. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1552/2008. Shankar Singh and others Vs. The Judge M.A.C.T. Ajmer and others Date of order:- 19/02/2008. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Neeraj K.Tiwari for the petitioners. BY THE COURT:- This writ petition has been filed against the order dated 25/9/2007 whereby the application of the petitioners who claim to be father and brothers of the deceased has been rejected. The application was filed with the prayer that they be treated as claimants along with respondent No.2, wife of the deceased. 2) Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that contention of the petitioners is that Smt.Rekha claimant is not wife of the deceased and that in fact marriage of the deceased was never solemnized with Smt.Rekha. Deceased was only engaged with her. On that basis, she cannot file claim petition and claim compensation. The Tribunal rejected the application holding that the SBCWP NO.1552/08. 2 application has been filed with a view to delay the proceedings. 3) Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the impugned order, I find that the learned Tribunal did not deem it appropriate to implead the petitioners as co- claimants with the original claimant, respondent No.2, Smt.Rekha wife of the deceased. 4) In my view, the approach of the learned Tribunal cannot be faulted particularly when petitioners had been even admitting the existence of ring ceremony of the claimant with the deceased. If they want to claim the compensation for themselves, they can file a separate claim petition. 5) I do not find any extraordinary reason to interfere with the impugned order. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil