o§)% BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) ’ W.P.(S) N0. 529'?) OF 2011 PETTIONER : Chhatradhari lal Ojha, aged years, S/o Khem Ram Ojha Village Boriyakala Pos't Sejbahar mana Camp District Raipur (CG) _ VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through — The Secretaly, Education Department D.K.S. Building, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, District Raipur, (1G. m I Q‘%§’%.I'......- W6 Raipur, Distt‘ . Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2%6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ’ " . .ww..;2.a:4/.M"m 200 mm (Wu) WWW WWW§E€TW avaimm SB : on’hie Shxi Manindra Mo han Shrivastava, J.] 24.6.2011 Shri Somkant Verma, co pnsel for the petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. Learned counsel for the: petitioner submits that because of delayed absorption, salary of Jhe petitioner 1'11 respect of the period from 8.6.1998 to 16.4.1999 has not been paid for none of the fault of the petitioner. He submits that identically situated co-employee of the same institution, raising this very gn'evance, had filed a writ petition and his petition hds been allowed Vide order dated 15.7.2010 (Annexure P—3) passed in the case of S.L. Yadav Vs. State of M.P. (now C.G.) & a ther {W.R (S) No.3103/05]. Learned counsel for the petitioner su mits that case of the petitioner is identical to the case of S.L. Ya av (supra). The Claim of the petition r does not appear to be frivolous and therefore the respondents a under an obligation to consider petitioner’s representation. - Accordingly: responden, No.2/District Education Officer, Raipur is directed to consider etitioner’s claim after due verification ’ of facts and if it is found that t e petitioner is also similarly situated as S.L. Yadav and covered by he order dated 15.7.2010 passed in WP. (S) No.3103,’05, the salary in respect of the period. from 8.6. 1998 to 16.4.1999 shall be paid to him. With the aforesaid directian, the petition is finally disposed of. f Sd/- " 9-. ,,../Manindra Mohan Shrivastava i Judge