- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.300 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.300 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.300 OF 2005 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.824 OF FROM ORDER NO.824 OF FROM ORDER NO.824 OF 2004 2004 2004 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.P.K.Dhakephalkar with Mr.V.S.Kapse for the Applicant. Shri Arif Bookwalla i/b M/s.Pandya Gandhi & Co. for Respondent No.1 CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : MARCH 3,2005. : MARCH 3,2005. : MARCH 3,2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Not on board. 1. Heard Counsel appearing for the parties. I have also heard the representative of Court Receiver. After hearing both the parties I find that there is no default made by the Applicant in complying with the directions given in paragraph No.3 of the order dated 4th November 2004. Even the Representative of the Court Receiver is unable to point out any default committed by the Appellant. 2. It is made clear that if as of today there is any delay by the Appellant in complying with the order, the same shall - 2 - stand condoned. 3. Application is disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs. JUDGE. JUDGE. JUDGE.