IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3391 of 2008 NARMENDESHWAR KUMAR @ NARMADESHWAR KUMAR SINGH SON OF LATE SHYAM BAHADUR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHANUSHI, P.S. LALGANJ (KARTAHAN), DISTRICT VAISHALI, AT PRESENT SINGH COMPLEX, HATHSARGANJ, NAKA NO.3, P.S. HAJIPUR TOWN, DISTRICT VAISHALI. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MULKI RAI SON OF LATE DHARIKSHAN RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SITABGANJ BAZAR (HARPUR NAND), P.S. NAYAGAON, DISTRICT SARAN (CHHAPRA). ... ... OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 3. 22.6.2010. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has prayed for quashing of order dated 21.11.2007 passed in Sessions Trial No.129 of 2005 by Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.V, Vaishali at Hajipur. By the said order, the learned court, while exercising power under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has summoned the petitioner to face the trial. On perusal of the impugned order, it appears that several witnesses have said during the trial regarding involvement of the petitioner. The witnesses have stated that this petitioner had thrown the dead body in a well. In view of evidence, which was brought 2 N.H./ during the trial, learned Sessions Judge, after being satisfied that there were sufficient material to proceed against the petitioner by its order dated 21.11.2007, has summoned the petitioner to face the trial in Sessions Trial No.129 of 2005 arising out of Hajipur Town P.S. Case No.246 of 2004. Shri R.B. Roy Raman, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, submits that the learned Additional Sessions Judge has rightly passed the impugned order. After going through the record as well as impugned order, I am satisfied that the learned Additional Sessions Judge, while passing the impugned order, has committed no error. Accordingly, I do not find any merit in the petition and petition stands dismissed. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)