CWP NO.1708 OF 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. DATE OF DECISION: 03.2.2009 Gurmail Singh ...Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab & Others …Respondents CORAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI PRESENT: Mr.Gurnam Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.BS Chahal, DAG, Punjab Permod Kohli, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. On the asking of this Court, Mr.B.S.Chahal, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents-State. With the consent of the counsel, this petition is disposed of at motion stage. The petitioner was engaged as junior Lecturer Assistant in Government College, Patiala. Earlier his services were terminated, but under the orders of the Court, he was reinstated in service. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has not been paid the service benefit and the period of termination has also not been decided. The petitioner made representations dated 4.10.2004 (Annexure P-6) and dated 29.9.2008 (Annexure P-10) and till date no decision has been taken on the same. It is CWP NO.1708 OF 2009 2 further contended that even the benefits as per the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court have not been paid. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the respondents are directed to consider the representations and take a decision thereon. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take a decision on the representations (Annexures P-6 and P-10) within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is furnished to respondent no.2. If the petitioner is found entitled to the claim, the same be released to him, if there is no legal impediment. Needless to say, in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, it should be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 03.2.2009 MFK