IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20333 of 2011 Rakesh Kumar Mandal & Anr. Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 5 4.8.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Two petitioners are named accused in this case of assault and abuse to the informant who simply prohibited petitioner no.1 from misbehaving with girls of vicinity and he went before the brother of petitioner no.2 and requested for not repeating such nefarious activity. At that time petitioner no.1 inflicted injury on the back portion of the head of the informant by cricket bat and chosen part of vital one and the injured remained senseless for several hours. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner no.1 is not entitled for privilege of anticipatory bail. So far as petitioner no.2, Mukesh Kumar, is concerned he carries no specific allegation except not paying any heed of complain, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let him be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Katihar, in connection with Nagar ( Sahayak) P.S. Case No.134/11, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive 2 dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, and in default of payment of any installment the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. AnilKrSinha (Akhilesh Chandra,J.)