THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.8815 of 2011 BETWEEN: Smt. Nahed PETITIONER And 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mahabubnagar, Mahabubnagar District, and others. RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: Sri P. Venkata Rao Counsel for the respondents: G.P. for Civil Supplies The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is misconceived. The petitioner claims to be a temporary fair price shop dealer of Bandameedipally village and continuing as such since the date of his appointment from 29.09.2010. The 3rd respondent Tahsildar, Mahaboobnagar Mandal has issued notification No.M.3396/2010, dated 4.01.2011 calling for applications from the intending applicants for appointment of a dealer on regular basis. The petitioner admittedly has not filed any application in pursuance of the said notification, but she has filed this writ petition challenging the said notification contending that the said notification does not specify to which category the dealership has been earmarked. Except stating this, the petitioner neither placed any material nor relevant details as to why a notification should mention the category of dealership also. The petitioner, who claims to be a temporary dealer in respect of the same shop, apparently seeks to stall the regular appointment for obvious reasons. Hence, there are no bona fides on the part of the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J. 11th April, 2011 Js.