HECE SGEERT 9F CHHA?TESGARH AT EELgSPgR EW§S§§N gENCH €3$RAWE HGNIELE SE‘ER? RAJEEV GUPTA. CJ. Hnh!’Dl E éUR: SuNgL Kl ihnA§ é§ iLiA I Migc. %§ne&é 315§2€3€J€§ MEsc. Aanea§ amdef SecEim 173 af the Maw? Vehicles Act, 1m §reseni : Shri SC Verma, counsei forthe aspel§an€. sh“ ‘ha uaSwauI mama rum». uuyxa, u0u1i$cl A .m A1 c :GI .w-m vcclavnumu “RA...“- M NO.3. @RDER {24m Augast, mm} The foilowing order of the Court was passed by Rgeev Gama, CJ. Learned counsei for the parties are heard an iViCP i Ne.1’IQU/20G6, a petition for condonation cf the delay in fiiing the appeei‘ 2) 0n due considera‘rion oi the submissicns of learned counsel for the-parties and the grounds taken in the application, we are AweEéam Maheshram Tandon; S/a Kejawa Cia.man€ ‘fandon aged abaut 3G yeara Rio Shuidhui, PO ‘Dhangaen, Dist: Ramur I, r*\ x w; VERSE?» Resmmdeag Shri Bhagwan Ji $hah, SID Motimai Nan-appiicants Shah 3y Smt m rajeet Kaur W/o Tarsem Singh, Filo Quartea' NOEWS 3&7 Vaisha§é Nagar Bhiiai, Dist: urg ($G} 2 Smt Indrageet Kaur W/a Tarsem Sinah, R/o Vaishah‘ Nagar Quarier NGEWS 367 Bhiiai, Dist: Burg {CG} 3. The New End‘ia msurance Cami 3y Divésima§ Manager, The New ind§a lnsumnce Co.Ltd.. Jaii Raod. Disti Raipur(CG) satisfied Ehat the appeEiant has succeeded in showEng suE’Ticient cause fer the deiay in fiiing the appeaii 3) MCP Nofi’IOG/2O'C6, therefore, is; aiiowed and the dieiay in fiiing the appeai ie hereby condoned. 4) Learned oounsei for the parties are heard on admission. 5) Appeiiam Maheshram ’i‘aridon has fiied this appeai against the impugned award daied 29.03.2005 passed by the 14m Additionai Moior Accident Ciaims Tribunai; Raipur in Ciaim Case No.1D3/2GD4: whereby‘t’he appeiiantis ciaim petition was dismissed hoiding that the driver of the truck beaiing iegistration NoMP—23- BA—G345 was responsibie for the accident whereas the ciaimant has sought compensation from the owner and insurer of the truck bearing registration No. M?-23—SA~4029. 5) $hri SC Verma, iearned counsei for the appeiiant seeks permission to withdraw the oiaim petition fiied by the appeiiant ,1 claimant against the driver, owner and insurer of the truck bearing registration No. MP-éé-DA-4Q29 with iiberty of tiiing another ciaim petition against the driver, owner and insurer of the truck bearing registration No. MP—23-DA—G345. 7) ijermission granted. 8'} With the above iiberty, the ciairn petition is dismissed as withdrawn. ‘ padma ‘1 §) With the above order, the appeal / ‘ ‘ ‘ k Sci/— Sdl- . i Chief Justice sum] Kumar Slnha Judge