IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4101 of 2010 1. NATHU MIAN S/o Hakim Mian 2. SATTAR MIAN S/O HAKIM MIAN 3. BARKAT MIAN S/O ILUMUDDIN MIAN ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE PAKDIHAR, P.S. SATHI, DISTRICT WEST CHAMPARAN ….. Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR …. Opposite Party ----------- 3 30.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners are named accused of the case registered under Section 326, 307, 302 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that these three petitioners entered inside the house and they poured acid causing injury to the informant and others in course of which one of the injured died. Submission is that there is no source of identification because the occurrence is of night and no body has seen it, but, implication is on account of enmity. Only one person was seen escaping from the place of occurrence i.e. Nathu Mian was seen escaping from the scene of occurrence, whereas, no body has seen other two petitioners there. The informant has received injury which was caused by liquid acid. This is apparent from the post-mortem report. Injury report was sent to the C.J.M. which is available on record. Another injured has also received similar injuries by acid. One person had died there. It is these three persons who are named who threw acid on the body of the informant, her husband and son. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail of the above named petitioners is presently rejected. Praful ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)