1 ndm 7 cac.253.07 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 253 OF 2007 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (stamp) NO. 15479 OF 2007 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. A.A.Kocharekar for the Applicants. Mr. Manish Upadhye for Respondent No. 1. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 1st December, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned counsel for 1st respondent. Reply of 1st respondent is taken on record. 2 The learned counsel appearing for 1st respondent opposed the application by contending that there is no sufficient cause. 3 It must be noted that on 20th October, 2006, the Applicants filed a writ petition for challenging the impugned order in which notice was issued. Thereafter, Applicants were permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a civil revision application. In view of averments made by the Applicants, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay of 71 days. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). [ A.S.OKA, J ]