"-l' 3 IN TJHB HIGH COURT OF JODICATURE AT BILASFOR CHHATTISGARHy W.P. N0. ^^5 /2006 PETITIONER: RESPONDENfTS TS^^ ^'. \^yy iV-'sss'' y 4s^y .•••"'cs?-T .yi- \^ ^y^y -^ Mahesh Sinha, Aged about 47 years, S/o. Kawali Ram Sinha, R/o. Sub-Inspector, P.S. Bagbahara, District Mahasamund (CG) VERSUS / 1] State of Clihattisgarb, Through: Secretaiy (Home), Police Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) / 2] Inspector General of Police, Raipur Range, District Raipur (CG) .^'- •if' '•.•<" .U ( / 3] Superintendent of Police, •^ \A^ . /i •ita'—i-— — —— -- -- -l r^" ^^- 'o- ^'..v^ ' •V-' Mahasamund, Distt Mahasamund (CG) 4] Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) WRIIT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLB 226/227 OF THB CQNSTITUTION OF 1VBIA w XI-HC-22 -TEI .->4i<ii<iq, '&fllyito. T«K'II'MI< sni'CT^t K;-iicb sn^i '^:ft^'^ft7T -^ H/. ft^ •s^ 311^1'S^IIWHfef Shri Mano] Paranjpe, counsel Shri Safish Gupfa, Dy. Govl. ^)' Application for urgent hearin{ ^or the petitioner. : • |dyocate for the State, on advance copy. Is ailowed. Ke Learned counsel for the petiti transferred vide order dated 8-1 Mahasahiund to District Sarguja. been made agalnst the pollcy, He the representation on 9/2/2006 to t^i received on 13/2/2006, butthess.me! State counsel on the other petitioner rnay be given an 'oefore the competent authority ofth^ on its own merits in accordance with Having considered-and withoUt of the case, in the opinion of this Oo' direction is given to the petitioner tif) his grievances before the eompeten) a copy of the petition and this ord^r, such representation being filed, the| shali decide the same on its own nter possible preferably withln two 10 ^TO?pft:?-:HIUdI 4 fe'Zi' ^f3R3K TatiSgiTan^ iijiner submits that the petitioner has been )6 Annexure P-10 from District further submits "that the transfer has |iso submits that the petitioner submitted je Director General of Police, which was !has not been decided so far. |hand submits that for the present the >rtt|nity of filing the detaited representation respondents, which shal! be considered law. expressing any opinion on the merlts Qourt, ends of justic®wiil 'oe sen/ed if a make a detalied representation raisin; authority of the respondents atong with rd^r, within two weeks from today, and on authority of the respondents in accordance.wth law as early as mclnths from the date of receipt of the n application for interim reiief. He prays ontinue. Learned counsei or the petiti|3ner submits that the petitioner has not .been relieved and he has stated it be allowed to t Having thus considered, it is <11 relieved; he may be allowed to contir^ietjii the With the aforesaid obsewatiorl Consequently M.W.P.No. S62r Certified copy as per ruies. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge s, thts '2006; that if the petitioner has not been representatioh is decided. petition stands disposed of. disposedof. [Tft^ifisT^