gst 1 ao68.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 68 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 102 OF 2011. Vasantrao Sugdeo Dandge.... ..... ..... Appellant. V/s Pimpri Chinchwad Mun. Corpn. & Ors.. .... Respondents. Mr.V.A.Thorat with Mr.R.A.Thorat i/by Mr.A.B.Tajane, Adv. For the appellant. Mr.S.S.Kanitkar, Adv. For respondents. Mr.Suresh Dubey, Adv. For respondent No.5. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. 28th February, 2011. PC: Learned counsel for the appellant does not press the appeal. He however requests that the present suit i.e. Special Civil Suit No. 1405/09 and the suit filed by the respondent No.5 i.e. Special Civil Suit No.2267/07 be directed to be heard and decided together. 2. I find that the request is reasonable, since evidence that would be required to be led in both the suits is almost common. In that view of the matter the Special Civil Suit Nos.2267/07 and 1405/09 be heard and decided together. Taking into consideration the controversy, suits are directed to be disposed of as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of one year from today. With the aforesaid directions Appeal stands disposed of. 3. In view of disposal of appeal, civil application No.102/11 does not survive and the same also stands disposed of.