WP(C) 6355/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR I. A. ANSARI Heard Mr. Rupak Dhar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. M. R. Pathak, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department, appearing on behalf of the respo ndent Nos.1, 2, and 3. By making this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner claims that the petitioner school is also entitled to receive fin ancial aid. In this regard, it may be pointed out that in terms of the direction s given in the order, dated 22.05.2007, passed in WP(C) No.4822/2006 (Kanaklata Girls ME School Vs. State of Assam and others), the State respondents were direc ted to consider the cases of education institutions for granting of financial ai d within 31.07.2007. Considering the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justice, it is her eby directed that as and when the State respondents consider the question of adv ancing financial aid to ME Schools, the respondents shall consider the case of t he petitioner school too and if the petitioner school is found entitled to such financial aid, the same shall be made available to the petitioner school in acco rdance with law. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition shall stand dispo sed of.