1 908-ao-704-2011.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY srj CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.704 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.949 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.704 OF 2011 Mrs. Resham R. Lund & Another .. Appellant. V/s. Chinar Co-op. Hsg. Society Ltd. & Others .. Respondents. Mr. A. M. Saraogi, for the Appellant. Mr. N. K. Mudnaney, for Respondent No.1. Mr. Nilesh Masurkar i/b. Juris Consult, for Respondent Nos.2 & 3. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 14th JULY, 2011. P.C.: 1 The appeal is preferred against refusal of ad-interim relief pending notice of motion, on the ground that there was no urgency. The learned counsel for the Plaintiff/Appellant makes a statement that the Plaintiff/Appellant will not carry out any civil work in the suit premises without obtaining prior permission of B.M.C. and without giving intimation to the Respondent-Society. 2 908-ao-704-2011.sxw 2 The learned counsel for Respondent No.1 states that the society will maintain status-quo in respect of the possession and the right of ingress and egress of the Plaintiff/Appellant to the suit property, pending the notice of motion. The statements of both the parties are accepted. 3 The Trial Court is directed to dispose of the Notice of Motion within eight weeks. The above referred statements shall remain in force till the disposal of the notice of motion. 4 In view of the above statements, appeal and application stand disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA, J.)