IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50560 of 2008 GANGIYA DEVI @ GANGIA DEVI @ SOSHILA @ SUSHILA DEVI@ REENAJE, DAUGHTER OF LAKHAN MAHATO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-BARAKI BAIRIA, P.S.LAUKARIA, DISTRICT-WEST CHAMPARAN------PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.1.2009 Heard Mr. B. K. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. Mehta, learned A.P.P. The case is under sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act, besides, section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. nor he was caught at the spot. His own confessional statement of being a Maoist appears the reason of his implication. The contention is that subscribing an ideology may not be an offence. Let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.3,000/-(Three thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana at Motihari, District-East Champaran, in connection with Madhuban P.S. case no.90 of 2005. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )