IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.855 of 2008 RAKESH KUMAR @ GUDDU SINGH MAHATMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 16.1.2009 KHAN Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In the instant revision application the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 15.5.2008 by which learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of offence under sections 302, 120(B)/34 of the Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Magistrate has not said that there is sufficient material for proceeding against the accused petitioner. Learned State counsel submits that commitment has been made in this case. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this court finds that this is not a case where no offence is made out against the petitioner and as such I do not wish to interfere with the impugned order. However, it will be open to the petitioner to raise all his points at the time of framing of charge. With the aforesaid observation, this application stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J)