In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … COCP No. 2100 of 2008(O&m) Date of decision: August 20, 2009 Kawal Singh son of Rattan Singh ..Petitioner Versus Jagdish @ Dharampal and others ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr. R.K.Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Sudhir Mittal, Advocate for the respondent Nos.1 to 6. Mr. Ashwani Gaur, Advocate for respondent Nos. 7 and 8 ,,, Rakesh Kumar Garg, J(Oral) The grievance of the petitioner in this case is that despite order dated 8.7.2005 passed by this court in RSA No.2097 of 2005, the respondent Nos.1 to 6 have alienated the property in dispute. In response to the show cause notice issued by this court, the respondents have specifically stated in their reply that the land which is the subject matter of RSA No,.2097 of 2005 has not been sold by the respondents. In view of the aforesaid reply filed by the respondents, I am not inclined to proceed further with the contempt petition. Rule discharged. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application in the aforesaid appeal seeking his remedy. August 20, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE