IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22040 of 2010 DHANANJAY KUMAR SINGH @ DHANANJAY SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02.07.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No.269 of 2009 for offence punishable under Sections 448, 342, 323, 498A, 504 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner with reference to three F.I.R.s placed at Annexure-1, 2 and 3 of the application submits that the parties have been on litigating terms and the charge made under Section 498A of the Penal Code is absolutely false. It is stated that the falsity of allegation as set out in Annexure-1 is apparent from the fact that this petitioner is not married to the informant rather he is married to Smt. Kumari Kiran daughter of Sri Brij Kishore Pandey, of Khedu Chapra, Saran and which marriage took place on 23.6.2007. Learned counsel for the petitioner in support of his contention refers to an F.I.R. placed 2 at Annexure-2 of the application instituted by the sister of the present informant with regard to an occurrence which took place on 1.5.2009, in which the petitioner has been made a named accused. He submits that though the informant of the present case claims marriage with the petitioner in the year 2008, but her sister who instituted the case on 1.5.2009 giving rise to Patliputra P.S. Case no. 126 of 2009 makes no reference to this relationship. He submits that the instance itself indicates that the petitioner has been wrongly roped in the present case. Having regard to the circumstances aforesaid, let the petitioner, namely Dhananjay Kumar Singh @ Dhananjay Singh be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 269 of 2009. Anand Kr. (Jyoti Saran, J.)