IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 22ND AUGUST 2008 / 31ST SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 25316 of 2008(L) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------- SAMEER.V.A, S/O. V.K. ABDUL KHADER, AGED 23 YEARS, VALLATHUPADY HOUSE, EDAVILANGU.P.O, KODUNGALLOOR, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.DILIP SRI.SAJU N.A. SMT.G.LEKHA RAJIV RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. MAHATHMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA.P.O, KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATHMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA.P.O, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. T.A.SHAJI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J ================== W.P(C)No.25316 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 22nd day of August, 2008. J U D G M E N T The petitioner appeared for the final semester examination of his BBA course in April 2006. Dissatisfied with the results, he applied for improvement examination in April 2008. Still when the results were published the petitioner did not get the expected marks. Therefore, the petitioner submitted Ext.P2 application for scrutiny of answer paper and Ext.P4 application for revaluation. The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to complete the revaluation process expeditiously. The petitioner also points out that the petitioner is expected to produce the mark list for further studies failing which, the petitioner would have to pay much higher fees. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the University would submit that the University would require at least two more months' time to complete the revaluation process. 3. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with the following directions: W.P(C)No.25316 of 2008 - 2 - Scrutiny of the answer paper, for which the petitioner has submitted Ext.P2 application, shall be completed within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The revaluation process shall be completed and results thereof declared, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. However, in view of the urgency pointed out by the petitioner, the respondent shall try their best to publish the revaluation results within the shortest time possible. This is subject to the further condition that the applications submitted by the petitioner are in order in all respects. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE rhs