IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7021 of 2011 SITA RAM PASWAN, son of Shivnandan Paswan, resident of Village-Nayatola Mehsaul Baswariya, Kamla Garden, Police Station & District- Sitamarhi… ..Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, 2. The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi, 3. The Deputy Collector (Establishment), Sitamarhi, 4. The Block Development Officer, Riga, Sitamarhi… …..Respondents For the Petitioner : M/s Virendra Kumar & Alok Kumar, Advocates For the Respondents : Md. Irshad, AC to SC-XVIII …………. 2 22.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner claims that he has either been transferred or deputed at different places within the span of two years. However, at the time of argument, learned counsel has confined his prayer only to the extent that his representation dated 28.2.2011 (Annexure-‘6’) made before the Collector, Sitamarhi, be considered and disposed of. Learned counsel for the State raises no objection in this regard. As a result, this writ application is being disposed of with a direction to the Respondent No.2, the District Magistrate, Sitamarhi, to consider the representation of the 2 petitioner dated 28.02.2011, contained in Annexure-6, and dispose of the same on its own merit in accordance with law within two months. It is made clear that this Court has not formed any opinion with regard to the merit of the case of the petitioner. Sanjay-II ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)