1 S.B.Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.3004 /2007 (Vikram Singh & Anr. vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : July 05, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.N.S.Bhati, for the petitioners. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. It appears that on the report lodged by the complainant for the offences under sections 457 and 380 I.P.C., the police submitted negative final report. However, on protest petition filed by the complainant, the trial court took the cognizance of the offences and issued the warrant of arrest against the present petitioners. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the police did not find the case against the petitioners, in my view, it would be more appropriate to direct the petitioners to appear before the trial court on or before 11.7.2007 and move a regular bail. If the petitioners surrender before the trial court on or before 11.7.2007 and move a 2 regular bail, the trial court shall consider and decide the same on the very day keeping in view the fact that the police did not find a case against the petitioners. Till 11.7.2007, the warrant of arrest issued against the petitioners shall not be executed. With these directions, the bail application filed by the petitioners under section 438 Cr.P.C. is disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-