IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42465 of 2011 Neeraj Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 14.12.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Nagendra Prasad, learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 120B, 147, 149, 384, 388, 389, 467, 468, 469, 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Later on, Sections 406 and 420 of the I.P.C. was also added. The accusation is for executing the development agreement under threat and snatching Rs. 10,000/- from the informant. The informant claims the land on the basis of gift from the maternal grand father. The petitioner claims that he got executed an agreement from Ram Charitra Singh wrongly recorded in the agreement as Ram Parichhan Singh who claimed himself adopted son of original landlord but subsequently when the petitioner found that the informant’s side is claiming by virtue of gift deed and got mutation of the land done he wanted to get returned the agreement amount. Considering the accusation in the back ground of serious dispute with regard to claim of title with regard to land, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 349 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Danapur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)