1 crap3105.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3105 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3104 OF 2010 Abdul Habib Kasambhai Lulaniya ...Applicant VERSUS Mazzam Ali Syed Mansoor Ali Hashmi ...Respondent ..... Shri G.R.Syed, advocate for applicant Miss. Gudgilla, advocate h/f Shri Vijay Sharma, advocate for respondent ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 1 st April, 2011 PER COURT : 1 Heard Shri G.R.Syed, advocate for applicant and Miss. Gudgilla, advocate h/f Shri Vijay Sharma, advocate for respondent. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 30 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Application seeking leave to file appeal against the 2 crap3105.10 judgment and order of acquittal dated 29.4.2010, passed by the learned 8 th Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nanded, in S.C.C. No. 2072 of 2007. 3 Miss. Gudgilla, advocate holding for Shri Vijay Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent opposed the application vehemently. 4 For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily and it further appears that the delay caused in filing the accompanying application is not willful, deliberate and intentional and same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 5 Hence, present Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 30 days caused in filing the accompanying application seeking leave to file appeal stands condoned and present Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE), JUDGE. dbm/crap3105.10