HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU! — i'BLE SHR1 RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ & HON'BLE SHR! SUik,'iL KU,MAR SiNHA, J. Writ Petftion No. 1811 of 2006 Petitioner ^ Ashok Didoja S/o Late Shri .1. Dsdoja, sged about 4S vears, r/o and 6, LJ/^ » >^> i«^<i^l Oini/'ki^f^ ^% »1il,^> »%l* l/*^+il^^^k n^Ui&niy &uciiu </Vtujiy, r-^at.^ci Taiab, Raipur (C.G.) ResDondents State of Chhattisgarh, through c?^>,«,u^ji»-.^* r\^..j».i»*4—^_^^A y, ucpajiliitciH of Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Shastri Chowk, 2. Chhattisgarh Housing Board, ^n^ ^rf^ • trf^ii^ s^^^ ^^^»hv^f*v%f^»^^^»^\^^»/^^^f^ 1 i ii uuy) i !ia» oui i if i J105»IU!iV;l, Shankar Naaar, Raipur (C.G.). IVIunicipal Corporation, Raipur, Throuyh its Commissionsr, Jaisiambh Chowk, Raipur (C.G.5 Joint Director, Town and Country -Planning, Buildina. Phool ChwK, RaiDur R.D.A. (C.G.) 5. Collector, Raipur (C.G.) 6. Senlor Superintendent of Po!ice, Ralpur (C.G.) 7. Poojya Sindhi Panchayat, Through its Prssidsnt Dr. G.D. Sundrani, S/o Late Jhaganmal Sundrani, aged about S5 years, R/o Shiv Mandir Road, Near Popu'iar Bread, Ralpur 2 (C.G.), and its office is situated Bhawan, Maln Road, Katora Tatab, Raipur at Panchayat 'r^ r^ \ \^.<-l.f Writ Detition under Artlcles 226/227 of tbe.Constitutionof India Present: snn Prasnant Jayaswat, learned senior counsel wrtn Shri Ajay Mishra, learned counsei for the petitloner. Shri N.K. Agrawal, learned Deputy Advocate General f^y •.,n,^^^^.^^^*^ M^ 4 _^ C 0 Z? iui i'copvi i<»i^iiio ii\iu. i, ^, 'JOt u. Shri Sanjay Patet, learned counset for respondent No.2. Shri Pankaj Agrawal, learned counsel for respondent No.3. Shri Y.C. Sharma, tearned counsel for respondent No.7. (26th March, 2Q08) following order of the Court was passed by Gupta, C.J. Shri Pankal Aarawal, tearned counsei for respondent No.3 has raised a preliminary objection about the maintalnability of the writ petition on the around that as the Corporation neither has granted any sanction to respondent No.7 nor any appiication for grant of sanction is pending for construction of a temple on the plot earmarked for playground, the petition is premature. 2. Shri Prashant Jayaswal, learned Senior counsel, In view of the above objection, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition fiied by the petitioner as 'Publlc Interest Litigation', with liberty of filing another writ petition, if the future developments so warrant. 3. Permission aranted. ^^. ^i E"a<ss s |^l,y /---^^ ^ subbu 4. With the above liberty, the writ petition is dlsmissed as wlthdrawn. 5. Consequentiv, the interim order dated 16-11-2006, stands vacated automaticatly. 6. The security amount of Rs.2,000/- deposited by the petitioner be refunded to the Retitloner. Sd/- Chief Justlce Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge :) ~F~~