C-F Slg^ r ^^Ot IN THE HZ©HCOURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR ^ k °2- / 2010 ^"•y' ^'./^- 'y ^^ ^K^' .<:M^ €;£y^ ..••'"'.^'v ^ 2. 4> 4. Vaijantimaia, W/o Shri Pradeep Mahant, aged about 35 years, Posted as Shiksha Karmi in Boys Middle Schooi, Nawagarh R/o Navagarh, Tahsil Na'garh, District Durg (C.G.) "-A--- Anjani Thakur, W/o Shri Bhagwatram Thakur, aged about 33 years, Posted as Shiksha Karmi Primary Schoot BhalupatLNawagarh, R/o Navagarh, Tahsil Navagarh, District Durg (CG.) Alak Nanda, W/o Shri Devendra Meshram, aged about 40 years, Posted as Shiksha Karmi in M.S. Glris Middle School Nawagarh, R/o Navagarh, Tahsi! Navagarh, District Durg (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Department of Schoo! Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Chhattisgarh Board of Secon<jary Education (Madhyamik Shiksha MandaJ), Raipur (C.G.) Director/PrincipaI, Government Educational Coiiege, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) ^ ^ WRITPETSTSON ARTICLE 226 OF THE 78 W^T^lf^fW ?TSH W^T s^Hi^ WHC(T^<ff^» 'T^T ^ll^l^l^, ^xll^Ko, [®l<nj^^< ^l2.io..^o •-^Ft^OO 3TI^?T XT^7 (^o|i^<^T) ^TrW^lft^ 3?T^T (S.B: HON'BLE JUSTICE MR 15.12.2010 Smt. Anju Ahuja, Advoca| Shri V.A.Goverdhan, P| respondent No. 1,3, and 4. hleard. that she may be permitted to stage, however, a direction ma; No. 2 for declaring the D.Ed was held in the year 2005-2006 Learned counsel appear No. 1, 3 and 4 submits that representation to the responde representation would be cons time frame. Accordingly, the petition^rs this petition with liberty to file| respondent No. 2 within a perio| ^r^ferih 'Riwff ^ fe^ <r^^i< ^3tRm3TI^T PRITINKER DIWAKER :eforthe petitioners. anel Lawyer for the State/ Learned counsel appeari|ig for the petitioners submjts Iwithdraw this petition at this ^ be issued to the respondent r^sult of the petitioners, which ing for the State/respondent let the petitioners make a nt No. 2 and in turn, the said dered and decided within'-a are permitted to withdraw a representation before the |d of two weeks from today. In ^^ :C—78 W^T ^T k^ich ^sn arH^r ^^TC^ Amit ^fl^CII <h^ll<»» 'T^r T^i<Lii<n^ ^Ti1^4i<o, 1^cni^^< .aj.3zf..^ 200 3n^T-q3R7(^o|i^<^) turn, the respondent No. 2] accordance with law, after c<| circumstances of the case, wj weeks. The respondent No. 2| necessary compliance from tl required. It is madeclear that this opinion on the merits of th< concerned would be at liberty tc the petitioners in accordance wi Accordingly, the petition i +l^d41-1 tTm^ ^ fe^t TfW?TC '^3^R3:?T^T will decide the same in nsidering all the facts and :hin a further period of four is further directed to ensure le respondent No. 3, if so ^ourt has not expressed any case and the authorities decide the representation of h law. disposed of. Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge