IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.6155 of 2011 Date of Decision.06.07.2011 Kanwal Jit Singh .....Petitioner Versus Union of India and another .....Respondents Present: None. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The petition has been filed in person and at the previous hearing on 06.04.2011, there had been no representation for the petitioner and hence, the case had been adjourned to 25.04.2011. There had been a written request for adjournment on 25.04.2011 and the case was further adjourned for today. 2. The claim for consideration is for grant of pension, which was rejected already. There has been no representation for the petitioner for the last two hearings. 3. The writ petition is dismissed for default of appearance and non-prosecution. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 06, 2011 Pankaj*