1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1390 OF 2010 Smt Yogita G. Sapkal @ Sou Yogita Vilas Mali ...Petitioner v/s Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur and ors. ...Respondents Mr Anilkumar Patil for Petitioner. Mr S.N. Patil, AGP for Respondent No.6. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND A.R. JOSHI JJ. DATE : 22ND FEBRUARY 2010. 2 P.C. :- 1] The learned counsel appearing for petitioner states that the facts and law involved in this petition are similar to the facts and law involved in writ petition No.1364 of 2010, which is disposed off by us today. Hence, for the reasons given in that order, this petition is rejected. 2] The learned counsel appearing for petitioner submitted that the respondent No.7 who is to be appointed in place of the petitioner has given in writing that she is not interested in joining the services under the Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur in the post. Therefore, according to the learned counsel, direction should be issued to the Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur to consider the petitioner for appointment. In our opinion, it is not necessary to issue such a direction because in case the respondent No.l7 does not join, the Zilla Parishad is bound to follow the law and if according to law, on the basis of marks obtained by the petitioner, the petitioner is 3 entitled to be appointed, Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur is bound to do that. Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Private Secretary of this Court. Certified copy expedited. ( JUSTICE D.K. DESHMUKH ) ( JUSTICE A.R. JOSHI )