\' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.JSQ. ^\^ °\_ 12006 ^h / .H PETITIONER , ^/^••' / Ramkhilawan Patel S/o- Shri /.. ^ / y'K.<'"^/'' Ram Sundar Patel, Aged about •w '••"\ *••" //y ./.^ ^a* <•;? -^ sr / -^••' .^~ / w f1-^"y\ ^w y^v RESPONDENTS .., iA>'y; . ^fr^ 62 years R/o- Kofra Raod Vikas nagar Tehsil and District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1) State of Chhattisgarh ^ Through: The Secretary, Health and • Family Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt- Raipur (C.G.) 2) The Joint Director, Accounts . Treasury and Pension Bilaspur (C.G.) 3) The District Chief Medical , Officer, Raigarh Distt- Raigarh (C.G.) 4) The Block Medical Officer Block , Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . ,* 1) PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIOINER: As per cause title. r ^ XI-HC-78 tfl«T^fT8»^T^i 3'5?'qrai?PT, WTflu'ls, (sldiyy ^,^^ff..^°)^^ sn^rcra^ (t^3^T) 3n^Tq;rR-<i+ (PIT3n^Tsh>licti ,-\lff STdTWBfersn^T 11.8.2006:- Shri Sanjay Patel, counsel] Smfc Aaju Ahuja, Depu1|j respondents, on advance copy. Heard. By the iustant petition,| quasbiaent of the order dated an amount ofRs.27,731/- has Learaed couusel for the t amount has been directed to wifhout iuforming the peti.tione4 said amount is beiag recovered| petitioner is liable to pay fhis In fhe citcumstaaces, subniitted that the petitionei| representation to respondent Noj sanie, to which leamed counsel ) Having heard leamed to tiie facts aud circumstances any opmion ou the xnerit of th^ inake a detaUed representatiou a| respondent No.2 within a period respondent No.2 sbaU consider in an objective marmer and niouths fi»m the date of aecQrdance wifh law. The for fhe petitioner. y Govt. Advocate for ftie State/ petiticjner qiprf?pfrr wraY ir'fei^t <RRZTC ^isri^iTsn^T the petitioner has prayed for 29-10-2005 whereby fhe recoveiy of l|een ordered against fhe petitioner. fcetitioner submitted that fhe said |be recovered fix>in fhe petitioner how aud agam.st wliich item fhe fi'oia fhe petitioner and how the amlouat. le^rued counsel for the petitioner inay be atlowed to inake a 12 and he be directed to decide fhe |br respondents has no objection. for fhe partieg, having reganl c|f fhe case, aad without expressing case, the petitioner is aUowed to a^ong with a copy of this petition to ]of 10 days fi-om today and ia tura, ^he representation of the petitioner the same withiu a period of 2 rejceipt of the representation, in must be informed that how he coufasel dectde reicen P.T.O. j* ^^•^;-^^s:^ ^^- XI-HC-78 35T^TFIRT4, tSixfltl'IS, Islcliuy <TTq^l Sb*1|cb ^ 200 3TT^?T4ach (lipltj,CI^8T) sn^r ?;r f^TR; (RT SIT^T BiITR; Barve " ,1\ ?T(IRR of5(T STT^T ^-^' , how fhis aaiount is outstandiag he is responsibfc for inaking the Iiould be given opportuiiity for satae is Uable to pay the said amoun|l against the petitioner, and how| said payment, thereafter he subinittuig explanation of fhe Wifh fhe duiection aforesaiki, Consequentty, M.(W.)P. N4. of. Parties are entitfed for cerl^fied copy of ttus ordcr, iaiki °hi<iFn41-i Hwvfi if fs^S <R>i<-tfi< ^iSlf^TSn^T 1, the petition staads dteposed of. .3252/2006 also staads disposed Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge ^ ^'v^" P.T.O. ^r Y I* .._g^£^^''s'^^'t::t~-»"-~;'''"6^Sn! ^^^ri^^