IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 23273 of 2002 Between: M/s. Gold Finch Tours & Travels, Rep. by its Partner,B.Chiranjeevirao, S/o.B.Koteswara Rao, Flat No. 401, AuroraColony-II, Road No.3, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-34. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Joint Transport Commissioner & Secretary RTA Central, Khairtabad, Hyderabad-500 482. 2 Regional Transport Authority, Secunderabad Zone III, Secunderabad-500 074. 3 Bombay Mercantile Cooperative Bank Ltd., Rep. by its Branch Manager, Hussaini Building Complex, MJ Market, Hyderabad-500 012. 4 M/s. Satyam Computers Services Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, INA 1-8-303/36, Mayfair Centre, S P Road, Secunderabad. 5 Additional Registrar of Coop Societies/Central Registrar, O/o. The Registrar of Cooperative Societies AP, Gruhakalpa Complex, Nampally, Hyderabad-500 001. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. T.A.KUMAR FOR MR.D.V.BHADRAM The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent i.e. Joint Transport Commissioner & Secretary RTA (Cental) Hyderabad, in issuing fresh Registration Certiﬁcates on 7.12.1998 to 3rd respondent i.e.the Bombay Mercantile Cooperative Bank Ltd., Hyderabad in respect of the three buses bearing No AP 09V 1459, AP 09V 1549 and AP 09V 9879, despite the disputes pending before the 5th respondent i.e. the Additional Registrar of Coop Societies/ Central Registrar O/o the Registrar of Coop Societies, AP, Hyderabad as also the WA.No.825 of 1999 before this Hon’ble Court and consequential fraudulent transfer of the aforementioned three buses to the 4th respondent herein i.e. M/s Satyam Computers Services Ltd INA, Secunderabad by the 2nd respondent herein i.e. the Regional Transport Autjhority, Secunderabad, as illegal, arbitrary, fraudulent, malaﬁde besides being violative of cardinal principles of natural Justice and hence set aside them.” At the hearing, Sri T.A.Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri D.V.Bhadram, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since the dispute in the writ petition is settled out of Court, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 4th AUGUST, 2008. kvni