TA No.75 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH TA No.75 of 2011 Date of decision : 15.03.2011 M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. ...Applicant Versus Paramjit Kaur and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Vipul Dharmani, Advocate, for the respondent. JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J. (Oral) TA No.75 of 2011 2 1. At the very outset, the learned counsel for the respondent submits that the appeal preferred by Gurcharan Singh, the husband of the respondent No.1, at Chandigarh has been withdrawn and now only one appeal, preferred by the wife (respondent No.1 herein), is pending at Ludhiana. The instant application was filed with a purpose to avoid conflicting judgments by the two Courts of competent jurisdiction at Chandigarh and Ludhiana, respectively, however, that eventuality does not survive after the withdrawal of the petition by the petitioner therein at Chandigarh. The learned counsel submits that in view of this fact situation, the instant application has been rendered infructuous. 2. In view of the above, the present transfer application is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, keeping in view the peculiar facts and the history of litigation between the parties, the learned District Judge, Ludhiana, is directed that he shall make an endeavour to decide the pending appeal preferred by the respondent on merit within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 15.03.2011 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) atulsethi JUDGE Note : Whether to be referred to Reporter ? Yes / No