'Zi •\^- HI6H COWT OF CHHATTIS4MRH AT KB^SPW M.A. NB. 217/2006 CORAm: HonUe Shri S.R.Noyak. Chief Justice & Hontrfe Shri OUip Iteataheb D—hnukh,J. Appeflonts Respondents 1. Rqjesh Sahu, S/o- Sirdhor Sahi. aged obout 18 yews, R/o- Villoge-KoMncndd, Police Station-Piporiya, toBordha, Oistrict- Kdbirdham (C.6.) (Oriver of the vehicte) 2. 5ant Ram Sahu, S/o Jagtu Sahu, oged about 45 yeors, R/o-Villoge Baradi, Police Stotion- Pipariya, Kamfardha, t>istrict--kd»irdham(C^.) (Owner of tiie Tempo No.C^.-09-ZA-6020) 1. Jalerfiwar Prosod. S/o-Jogiram Chandrwanshi, cged ttoout 32 years, R/o- Kosmando, Tehsil-Kawardha, Oisfricl'- Kabirdhnm (to«<rdh<()(Cj6.) 2. Shafik Khah S/o Mohammad MusTafa Musolman, aged obout 48 years, R/o- ward no.2 Mohtanaya ward, Behind Uixroi Lo<^e, Ka»ar<Uio, Tehsil-KaNiordw, &istriet- Kabirdham (C.@.) Shri F.S.Oiare, tearned couisel for •the appellants. ORALORbER passedon 12.4.2006) The following oral order of the Court WCB passed by Oilip RaoMheb beshnwkh, J. In tiiis appeal preferred by the Ouiner of ttie offending vehicle and Driver thereof, the only point urged by •rtie leamed counsel for the appellanls before us is that the respondent No.2 herein tws the r<9istered owner of the offending vehicle i»hiehfoct has been ignored by •rtie learned Mota- Accident Ckrims Tribunal while fdstening Ikdaility on Itie appellants. Learned counsel however, submitt-ed rtiat no evidence to substantiate the obove contentton was led before the Atotor Accident Cbiima Tribunal. In •this view of the matter, •the aword of lecmed Motor Accident Cloims Tribuiol cannot be faulted with. This appeal being devoid of merit 'is occerdingly dismissed. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- , Diiip Raosaheb Deshmukhl Judge i ,^TA*-