IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR gcHHATnsgmH) y’w F. A. r3703 Izoo4 FinsmppEAL m5, as OF cmc / APPEAL AGNNST THE JUDGMENT DATED 13.01.2004 AND ECE DATEB “16.01104 PASSED iN CIVIL SUIT M 12—312mm av SEVENTH ADDmONAL DismICT JUDGE LEAs‘i‘ TRAEK EQUET) ifIEEE! {Ea} D G, x Vaiuation of the suit in the Valuation Triai Sourt far thE purpgse t muri feeg anti juriEdictian R3E24323ij RE.?3E3G.§E3 Same in First Appeal Rs.62432.80 C.F. Paid Rs.7360.00 y ’ M ‘ APPELLANTS 1. /8enicnr Superintendent of p9st5 EEfENDANTS Division Durg, Civic Centre Bhiiai District Durg (C.G.) Director Postal Services and flhiei‘ Post Master Generai, Raipur, (C.G.) Post Master fiurg, t» Main Post Office QERoad, Durg (CG) VERSLis RESPONDENT i D.M.Dongre, Sfa‘kMango Ji PLAINTIFF Dongre, agéd about 44 yearg Rio. Quarter No.9—B, Road NG.—6, Seator—i, Bhiiai, Tah. and District Durg (C.G.) SB: HON. SHRI JUSTICI 12— 1—20 10 None for the appeE Case is called twi §ppe11ant V In the circumstan but to dismiss the appea The ‘appeal is dism‘ issed for non-prosecution. E N.K. AGARWAL ant. ce. Even than, none appears for the ces, this Court is left with no option ll. Sd/- N.K. Agawal Judge