1IN THE IDGH COURTOF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.No_2"LC"i)/2002 SSBSSIS PETITIONERs 1. Sunil Gupta aged 32 years S/o OP Guptaresidentof74/15 NehmnagarEast Bhilai-Durg(C.G.) 2. Dr. KB Gupta aged 57 years S/o Late Shri Balkrishan Gupta, 125, SadarBazar Ferozpur Cantt(Punjab). 3. Dr(Mrs.) Kanchan Bala Gupfa aged 52 years W/o Dr.RB Gupta, resident of 125, Sadar Bazar, Firozpur Cantt(Punjab). 4. Pushpa Rani, aged 46 years W/o Bhagwan Das, 755, Padmanabhpur, Durg(CG). 5. Mr. Kumkum Gupta, aged 48 years W/o MK Gupta resident ofHotel Deluxe, Rourekela(Orissa). 6. Mrs. Anita Gupta aged 42 years W/o Rajindra Gupta, resident of 038, Vasudha Appartments, Sector-9, Rohini, Delhi. 7. Prem Nath, aged 45 years S/o Gorakh ram resident ofC/o Jai Bajrang Home Appliances, Station Road, Durg(CG) 8. MS Radhakrishnan aged 62 years S/o Dr. Syama Rao, resident of 56/57 2nd Cross, 22 Main Raghvendra Layout, Padmanabhnagar, Banglore. 9. Ku. D.Vimla aged 42 years D/o Shri DV Subhha Rao, resident of qr.no.226 Indian Oil Nagar, IP Road, Andheri West Mumbai. 10. Mrs. D. Lalita aged 62 years W/o DV Subba Rao resident ofqr.no.226 Indian Oil Nagar, IP Road, Andheri West Mumbai. Vs RESPONDANT 1. Nagar Palika Parishad, Bhilai- Charoda Through the ChiefMunicipal Officer, Bhilai-3 Distt-Durg. ;2. StateofChhattisgarh. Through the Principal Secretary, Nagriya Prashashan, Govt ofChhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) Petitioner under Article 226 ofthe Constitution offodia. The petitioner named above most humbly submit as under- PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER - Particulars offhe petitigsetS aie as given in the cause title. 1. ^, ^^^'^' .'>:^^ ^•^<s^>^~ ^y '&s^ ^- XI-HC-22 'S^ '^-iWWi, 8Tll<H'16, (sfclltiy "H"fl *ilcn dl^?l _^i^£...^^^./^ ^"T^?T'q:;i '^(N? STR.'SI. 1 a;TfWRT?ti T sntff s^n'sn: Tlft? =ti!<li(-t4]-1 •BTIRTS' ^ •fs^T TfSTCR ^i'sTpfft; sn^i 1 w.? "E i%^ Qf^fl^ i ^ A.^\? ^SU'U^ Shri R.M. Solapurkai-, couiisi^l for the^e'fcitiori.ers. Shri Saaiay K. Agarwal, Dy. Advocate General ibr the State. 'Fhis writ petttion is direc^ed agaiast fae uotlce dated 13/6/2001 issued by responiient y.o. 1 - Chief Muiiicipal Ofiicer, BhiJai-3, Distt. Durg, whereoy axi ^inount. has been levied on fhe pea'tioner for not starting coalstn.iction work as per the agreeisient. Accorduig to leamed iionce is b^ci. counsel for t3ie petitioner, the Haviag Jiearct leamed coun; at this il—1 j^*i//» entertaia this writ petitioB^ If a botice has been served whicu. j accordiEig to 'the petitioner is nolj notliuig prevents taem. troiu tiling tlie appropriate authority raisilig vsJidifv of tlie notice is assailed. IIGT siiciiiieci in accordauce witii lErA' tfa£n appropnate o bjectiorLS belore ppecitic grouiicts 011 wfiicu Accoriingly, if so advised, the 1 pe'dtioners uiay file the.ir objectioa^ srid irj. case ttiat is done, iii ajl fainiess the Authoriti,r shall lodk into the matter and pass appropriate orders 'thereon. With the above observatic petrtiDii is disposect ot, LS aiid direcnons, this ii-rit Sd/- P.C NAIK Judge ^