C.R. No. 57 of 2010 27.5.2011 Present:- Mr. Ajay Kumar, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, counsel for respondents No.1 and 2. The learned counsel for the parties have jointly stated that the order dated 26.4.2010 passed by the Rent Controller (V), Shimla under Section 11 (3) of the H.P.Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 (for short’ Act’) is ad-interim order. The application is still pending before the Rent Controller (V), Shimla and it has not yet been disposed of. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it will be appropriate if the Rent Controller decides the application under Section 11 (3) of the Act. The order dated 28.5.2010 in CMA No. 35- 6 of 2010 in Case No. 2-2 of 2010 is set-aside with a direction to the Rent Controller (V), Shimla to decide the application under Section 11 (3) of the Act finally in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The parties through their counsel are directed to appear before the Rent Controller (V), Shimla on 3.6.2011. Let the record be remitted to the Rent Controller (V), Shimla, so as to reach before the date fixed. The petition is disposed of so also the pending application(s) if any. May 27, 2011 ( Kuldip Singh ) (GR) Judge