IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.168 of 2011 Anila Jain , W/O- SRI ATUL KUMAR JAIN, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA, MISHRA SADAN, NORTH SRIKRISHNAPURI, P.S. SRIKRISHNAPURI, TOWN AND DISTRICT PATNA :-- PETITIONER/REVIEW PETITIONER. Versus 1. The Patna Regional Development AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS VICE-CHAIRMAN, PATNA. 2. THE VICE-CHAIRMAN, PATNA REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, PATNA. 3. THE VIGILANCE OFFICER, PATNA REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, PATNA. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DIVISION-C, PATNA REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, PATNA, ALL HAVING THEIR OFFICES AT MAURYA LOK COMPLEX, P.S. KOTWALI TOWN AND DISTRICT- PATNA. 5. SRI PRAMENDRA NATH SINGH, S/O- SRI PARAS NATH SINGH, RESIDENT OF PARAS LOK COMPLEX BORING ROAD, PATNA :--RESPONDENTS/OPPOSITE PARTIES. ---------------------------------- 3. 04.08.2011. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Recall of the order dated 29.3.2011 passed in C.W.J.C.No. 5791 of 2006 is being sought on the basis of the statement of facts made in paragraph 27 of the writ petition. In support of the statements made in paragraph 27 no record has been placed to support the statement. In the circumstances, it is difficult for the High Court to rely on those statements. Review petition is, accordingly, dismissed on the ground that petitioner never questioned the order dated 17.3.2001, Annexure-2 which led to the demolition of the shop-in-question. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)