IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12792 of 2009 1.VIMAL CHAND JAIN @ VINOD JAIN 2.KAMAL JAIN Both Sons of Maniklal Shrishrimal, Resident of 21, South Avenue, Chaubey Colony, Near Mian Gate, Rajkumar College, Raipur, District Raipur(Chattisgarh). ........Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. M/S SPEED CRAFTS LTD., Layak Bhawan, Boring Road, Patna through its Director S.S. Khadaria, Son of Late P.R. Khadaria, Resident of Layak Bhawan, Boring Road, P.S. Budha Colony, District Patna. .........Opposite Parties For the Petitioners : Sri Sajal Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Sri J.S. Prasad Singh, A.P.P. 02/- 30-09-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Sri Suraj Sandarshi for the opposite party no. 2. This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking quashing of order dated 23.07.2004 in Complaint Case No. 235(C) of 2004 passed by Sri S.K.Srivastava, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna taking cognizance for the offence under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioners. During course of argument, the learned counsels drew my attention towards Annexure 3, the petition for compromise filed before the court below stating therein that the money claimed has already paid by the petitioners to the complainant. This fact is admitted by learned counsel for the complainant-opposite party no. 2 also who further submits that in view of the above the complainant is 2 no longer interested to proceed with the case before the court below. Considering the facts and circumstances, impugned order as well as proceeding before the court below by way of Complaint Case No. 235(C) of 2004 is hereby quashed and this application with the consent of the parties stands allowed at the admission stage itself. Praveen ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)