THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO.406 OF 2000 20th August 2009 Between: Syed Muzaffar Hussain, S/o.dr.Syed Ather Hussain, 37years, Business, R/o.H.No.5-9-48/’SA, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad-500029. …APPELLANT AND 1. Golkonda Education Society, a Regd. Society having office at C-116, Mayur Kushal Complex, Abid Road, Hyderabad, rep.by its Chairman, Mr.Zafer Javeed. And one other. …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO.406 OF 2000 JUDGMENT: The appellant filed O.P.No.1271 of 1998 in the Court of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, against the respondents for various reliefs under the provisions of the A.P. (Telangana Area) Public Societies Registration Act, 1350 Fasli. His basic grievance was about the alleged mismanagement of the affairs of the Society and Institutions. Along with the O.P., he filed as many as five I.As., namely, I.A.Nos.3845 of 1998 to 3849 of 1998. The relief claimed in I.A.No.3849 of 1998 was for appointment of a Receiver, to look after the management of the first respondent-Society till a new Managing Committee is formed. The other applications were for the relief of declaration of the respondents’ Managing Committee as defunct, grant of injunction restraining the respondents from discharging their duties, directing the respondents to hold General Body Meeting immediately after conducting elections and to abolish the Governing Council of the Hyderabad Residency Degree College and P.G. Centre. The applications are opposed by the respondents. Through a common order dated 05.07.1999, the trial Court dismissed all the applications. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against I.A.No.3849 of 1998. Though it is represented that revisions are filed against the orders in other four applications also, the correct picture is not forthcoming. Heard Sri Manik Rao, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri M.Papa Reddy, learned counsel for the respondents. The appellant claims to be one of the members of the Society. He wanted appointment of a Receiver to administer the affairs of the Society. Grant of such a relief, even in the O.P., after recording of evidence and hearing of the parties, itself is some what extraordinary. It is just unthinkable to appoint a Receiver as an interim measure, that too, at the instance of one member. Even according to the appellant, the affairs of the first respondent are managed by the elected committees. In case, the term of the elected committee has expired, steps could have been taken to conduct elections properly. The trial Court has taken correct view, and and dismissed the matter. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the record in the O.P. was sent to this Court. The Registry shall take steps to return the record to the trial Court to enable it to proceed with the trial of the O.P. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ (L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J) 20th August 2009 RRB