-(1)- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1349 OF 2007 Mr.Prem Singhal s/o Anganlal Singhal. ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra and 16 Ors. ..Respondents. .. Mr.A.M.Saraogi, Adv. for the Petitioner. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for Respondent No.1-State. Ms.Neeta Parikh with Aniket Rele, Adv. for Respondent Nos.2 to 9. Mr.S.K.Jain, Adv. for Respondent Nos.10 to 17. .. CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 13, 2007. DATED : SEPTEMBER 13, 2007. DATED : SEPTEMBER 13, 2007. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. The learned APP for the State states that the petitioner has not been added as accused in the impugned FIR till this date. 3. The learned Advocate appearing for -(2)- Respondent Nos.2 to 9 and the learned Advocate appearing for the Respondent Nos.10 to 17 state that the dispute in relation to which the FIR was lodged has already been settled between the parties. 4. In the circumstances, the Petition is rendered infructuous and is accordingly disposed of. [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]