/ TN THIE HIGH COT3RT OF KA1TATAKA AT PANGALORE DATED THIS 1E 30Th Df DF JtYNE 1998 R0N’BtEMR JUSTICH.L. DATY NN4 Sri Shivananda kerappa Tesari, S/o, Fakkeerappa, aged aboit 30 years, Working as LectQrer in Geography in Sri S,V,S. Pre. University College, Jade, Shorab Taluk, Shioga Dist• (M/s Vagdevi Associates fo Petitioner AND: 1. The State of Karnataka, represented by its Secretary, ucation Departiient, M.S.Bufldlngs, P8ng81ore..j 2• The Deputy Director of Public Tnstructions, Shimoga District, Shitnoga. . , , 2 Z2 3, The Commissioner for Pblie !nstrutions in arnataka, ‘C, .Circle, Bangaloi1, 4, The Principal, -Sri S.V.&Pre_TTniversity college, Jade, Shorab Taluk, Shimoga Dist. 5, The Director, PreUniversity Education Board, Bangalore, : RSPONDS (Sri,9,iTdayasbankar, AGA for Tl to 3 & 5) This Writ petition filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitd ion of Tndia with an affidavit prayinE to quash the order dt. 2 9.4.94 and l5.,94 Issued by the vide Annexure ‘F’ and ‘D’ in so far as it relates to restricting the pay/Sa1a of the petItioner at miniin of the payscale of ,365O/— is concerned and etc., This Wt Petition caning on for bearing this dey, the Court made the following: O’R 0 • —3— ORDER Petitioner in this Writ Petition is staff working in aided private educational institutions. is before this Court interalia seeking directions to the respondents to accord certain service benefits including monetary benefits. In my view, these reliefs cannot be granted by this Court in veiw of the observations made by a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos. 1833 to 1836/1995 disposed off on 30.5.1998. This Court while considering the issue whether the staff (Teaching and non—teaching)- working in educational institutions run by private management can maintain Writ Petitions to claim financial aid from the State Government in the absence of Master and Servant relation and other incidental issues, was pleased to observe that the writ petitions filed by teaching and non— teaching staff of private educational institutions are not I -4- are not maintainable before this Court. Respectfully following the çbservations made in the aforesaid decision, this petition is disposed off as not maintainable before this Court for the reliefs sought therein. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach the proper forum as suggested by this Court in the aforesaid decision. Ordered accordingly. Sd/-JUDGE. r.by; 1gak High Cotirt of Kamata Bngaiore—6O Oc1. S