IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 85 of 2009 Between: Smt. Beesetti Saraswati, W/o. Nookeswara Rao, Hindu, Female, R/o. D.No. 57-1-31/B, Opp: Parameswari Picture Palace, Gokulnagar, Kancharapalam, Visakhapatnam-8. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, East Cost Railway, Waltrair, Visakhapatnam. 2 The Divisional Railway Manager, East Cost Railway, Waltair Division, Visakhapatnam. 3 Malla Venkata Appa Rao, S/o. (Late) Mallu Naidu, Hindu, Male, R/o. D.No. 44-35-55, Tatichetalpalem, Visakhapatnam-16. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any Writ, order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in accepting the technical bid of the third respondent in spite of his having no experience in managing the cloak rooms at any Railway Station much less at Visakhapatnam Railway Station hither to and opening his financial bid in spite of petitioner's objection for opening the same and not calling for negotiations in spite of her offering the same amount quoted by the third respondent as she is having the required experience in managing the cloak room being the subsisting contractor for the said purpose and the first respondent proclaiming to issue the proceedings of contract to the third respondent shortly without calling for any negotiations and without accepting the similar amount offered by her as quoted by third respondent as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and violative of Clause No.10 of Tender Schedule and Article 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to conduct negotiations before accepting the financial bid of the third respondent and issuing contract in his favour Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT.N.(P).ANJANA DEVI, SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.R.S.MURTHY The Court made the following : ORDER: Smt.P.Anjanadevi Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo in the registry seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.6.3.2009 Note: Furnish CC by tomorrow (B/o) msv