IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 2ND NOVEMBER 2010 / 11TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 33189 of 2010(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- 1. K.M.MATHEW, S/O.K.C.MATHEW, KUZHUVOMMANNIL HOUSE, KURAVANKUZHI P.O., PULLAD, THIRUVALLA. 2. SHEEBA MATHEW, W/O.K.M.MATHEW, KUZHUVOMMANNIL HOUSE, KURVANKUZHI P.O., PULLAD, THIRUVALLA. BY ADV. SRI.THAMPAN THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD ROADS SECTION PATHANAMTHITTA. 3. PRABHAKARA PANICKER, ANTHALIMANNIL VEETIL, KURAVANKUZHI P.O., PULLAD, THIRUVALLA. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 33189 OF 2010 (W) ===================== Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners complain of an attempt made by the 3rd respondent to trespass and encroach into the puramboke land, which lies adjacent to the petitioners' property. It is seen that petitioner and others have already taken up this issue before the 2nd respondent by filing Exts.P3 and P4 and these applications are pending. In that view of the matter,without expressing anything on the merits, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider Exts.P3 and P4 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Orders thereon shall be passed only with notice to the 3rd respondent also. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp The words “2nd respondent” occurring in lines 2 and 3 of the second paragraph of the judgment dated 2.11.2010 in W.P.(C) 33189/2010W are corrected as “1st respondent” vide order dated 30.11.2010 in I.A.No.16207/2010 in W.P(C) 33189/2010W. Sd/- Registrar (Judicial)