IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12552 of 2009 BIHAR RAJYA ARDHA SARKARI NIKAY PADADHIKARI SANGH, having its registered office at Sheo Colony, Raja Bazar, Patna-300014, through its authorized representative Shri Munna Prasad, son of Hari Nandan Prasad, Joint Secretary. …….Petitioner Versus 1. The Union Of India through Provident Fund Commissioner, New Delhi. 2. The Employees’ Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office, Bihar, Patna, through Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Bihar, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan, R-Block, Patna. 3. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan R- Block, Patna. 4. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan, R- Block, Patna. …….Respondents. ----------- 02. 16.09.2009 Petitioner is supposed to be a registered trade union sponsoring the welfare of all such members who are or were employees of semi government organizations, government Corporations or companies registered in that capacity. The Trade Union wants a direction upon the Respondents to fix monthly pensions for its members since it is alleged that they are covered under the Employees Pension Scheme, 1995 in terms of proviso to Clause 11(P) of the Scheme read with Clause 12 thereof. Counsel representing the Respondent Employees Provident Fund Organization states that these are individual causes and the same can not be pursued by the Union in representative capacity. If any 2 employee who also happens to be a member of the Union has been covered by the Scheme and has completed his part of the obligation and there is still any grievance thereafter, they are more than willing into and looking into the matter, no direction of the Court is required to be issued. Let individuals including members of the Union in their individual capacity, if they have any grievance, approach the Respondents for its redressal. With these observations the writ petition stands disposed of. Shageer (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)