1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C. A. F. NO. 1085 OF 2010 & C. A. F. No. 719 Of 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 479 OF 2010 New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Yogendra Rameshwar Dayal Rajavanshi & Ors. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Shri A. J. Pophaly Adv for applicant/appellant. CORAM: A. B. CHAUDHARI J. Dated: 14 th MARCH, 2011. C. A. F. No. 1085 of 2010: Heard. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause. C. A. F. No. 719 of 2011: Heard learned counsel for the appellant states that respondent no. 3 is not served on both the addresses. Learned counsel for the appellant states that respondent no.3 who is said to be a vehicle owner is required to be served by substituted service. He states that in a connected appeal he was served in the same manner so also in 2 the trial Court. In that view of the matter civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause. Civil Application is disposed of. JUDGE svk 3 4 5