S i^r^ IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTtSGARt-LAT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. f5)NO. U E^ /201^> PETITCONERS ^7.- .. ' .••'" ^ ^r--y^ .•••.'sr^'''V" ^yy --/?- ^••' r>-'' ,.!<;-' .»6"' . y;--' >>••' (;» --:IS^^RESPODNENTS ^ 1- ~ --""^<s\ '^ 3^^^ y :1. Joy Chakrabarty S/o J.R. Chakrabarty aged about 42 years, Head Master, (Sovemment Primary School Dohra, R/o Rampur Colony, Q.No. l-B-9, Baikunthpur Post Baikunthpur, Distt. Kon'a (C.6.) 2. Rajkumar Chafekar- S/o Sharad Chandra, aged about 43 years, t-tead Master, Sovemment Primary School Sanvaranva, R/o Village Patna, Distt. Koria (C.6.) -3. Mst. Asrita Bara, W/o Shri Zachauis Bara, l-1ead Master, 6ovemment--primary Schoo! Ani, Baikunthpur R/o Baikunthpur, Distt. Koria (C.G.) VERSU5 S-l-dte of Chhattisgarh Through S&er'etary,. ^School Education ESepartment, D.K.S. Bhawdn, Raipur (C.6.) Bir-ector, Public Instructions, Rdipur(C.(5.) Joint Dii'ector, Treasury Account & P&ns'iffn Korid Gifitt. Koria (C.G.) <2t. District Education Of-ficer, Koria (C.6.) ^5. Block Education Officer, Baikunthpur, bistt. Koria (C.6.) ^6. Deputy Director, Education, Baikunthpur, Distt. Sarguja (C.6.) WRIT PETCTCON U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTEON OF INDIA ^ Q-°> '-.^. / s- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR ts^s PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (S) N0.44 OF 2011 Joy Chakrabarty & Others Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Md. Tariq Haider, counsel for the petitioners. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 7th day of January, 2011) 1) By this petition, the petitioners seek a direction to the respondents to pay two advance increments from the da'te of passing of D.Ed examination, on their own expenses, during their service period. 3) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the present case is no longer res integra as the same has been considered and decided by the Supreme Couri: in Asha Saxena \f. Sfafe of M.P. & Ors. as well as by this Court in Yashwanf Kumar Bharadwaj v. MunJcipal Corporation, Durg and anothe^ and Gopesh Kumar Verma v. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another^. 4) Learned counsel further submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision as aforestated. Thus, the petitioners may be permitted to make a representation to decide their case in the light of aforestated decisions, subject to verification of the facts asto whether the petitioners have acquired D.Ed. certificate on their own expenses during the course oftheir service. 5) Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioners makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law and in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena (supra) as well as this Court in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (supra) and Gopesh Kumar Verma (supra), within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representation. 6) In view of foregoing, according to the tearned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 7) . Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. --—- ' 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59 2 2006 (TT) MPJR-CG 96 3WP(S)No.413aof2005 Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 :'^::."''A.^;;'^^^i^^^^^^.'A^yi'^l:^^Ba;?-^'.':.?