IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.481 of 2010 1. SURESH PASWAN S/O SHRI SARYUG PASWAN R/O VILL.- TURKI, P.S.- BHAGWANPUR, DISTT.- VAISHALI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY PATNA 2. ANUP MUKHARJEE, CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. AJAY NAYAK, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. DEVI RAJAK, ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 5. SURYU BAITHA, CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, DEHARI, ROHTAS 6. RAMESHWAR CHOUDHARY, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER WATER WAYS CIRCLE, BHABHUA (KAIMUR) 7. BABAN PANDEY, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER DESIGN AND PLANNING CIRCLE, DEHARI (CAMP INDRAPURI), ROHTAS 8. BHARTINDU NATH THAKUR, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER WAYS DIVISION, MOHANIA (BHABHUA), KAIMUR 9. BRIJ KISHORE SINHA, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PLANNING AND MONITORING DIVISION, DEHARI, ROHTAS 10. BHANU PRATAP SINGH, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 11. BINDESHWAR LAL, UNDER SECRETARY PERSONAL CLAIM FIXATION CELL, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 12. RAMESH LAL, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE BETTIAH, (WEST CHAMPARAN) For the petitioner : Mr. Ratnesh Prasad, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Subhash Pd. Singh, GA-7. ----------- 05. 06.04.2011 This contempt petition has been filed asserting that orders of this Court dated 10.8.2009 passed in C.W.J.C. No.5823 of 2009 has not been complied with, although Letters Patent Appeal No.613 of 2010 assailing the said order has been dismissed under orders dated 24.11.2010. Against the order dated 24.11.2010 State respondents have preferred S.L.P. before the Hon’ble 2 Supreme Court on 5.4.2011, which has not yet been numbered but from the certificate granted by Sri Gopal Singh, Standing Counsel for the State of Bihar dated 5.4.2011 it appears that the proposed S.L.P. against the order dated 24.11.2010 has been docketed in the registry of the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide Docket No.1117 of 2011. In view of the certificate of the learned standing counsel for the State of Bihar, counsel for the State states that opposite party nos. 2 to 12 shall abide by the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid S.L.P. In view of the statement made at the Bar by the counsel for the State, this contempt petition is disposed of. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)