IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 24TH JANUARY 2011 / 4TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 2371 of 2011(V) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ RASAK, S/O.AMMAD, AGED 55 YEARS, KARUPPANVEETTIL HOUSE, PALUVAI P.O., CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.SALIM V.S., DR.ABRAHAM P.MEACHINKARA. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. RAHIMA, D/O.PUTHIYAVEETTIL PACKER, PALUVAY DESOM, CHAVAKKAD VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD PO,THRISSUR-680 506. 2. VILLAGE OFFICER, CHAVAKAD, CHAVAKKAD PO-680 506. 3. THAIKKAD GRAMA PANCHAYATH REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, THAIKKAD, THRISSUR - 680 104. 4. SUB DIVISION MAGISTRATE, THRISSUR-680 104. R2 & R4 BYGOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.2371 OF 2011(T) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, pursuant to Ext.P4 petition filed by the first respondent, the 4th respondent has registered M.C.NO.222/2010. It is stated that on receipt of notice, petitioner has filed Ext.P6 objection and that despite the above, proceedings are still pending and as a result of which serious prejudice is caused. In such situation, the only order that needs to be passed is to direct the 4th respondent, who is seized of the proceedings, to finalize the same with notice to the parties and as expeditiously as possible. 2. In view of the matter, I direct the 4th respondent to finalize the proceedings in M.C.No.222/2010, with notice to the parties and within 6 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :