Delay Cond. App. 90 / 10 Restoration App. 34 / 10 In C-482 No. 583 of 2004 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Arvind Vashistha, Advocate present for the petitioners. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, Brief Holder present for respondent State. Mr. Lok Pal Singh, Advocate present for respondent No. 2 Ved Prakash Gupta (complainant). Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 makes a statement at Bar that the complainant Ved Prakash Gupta has died. The petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. was dismissed by this Court on 14.02.2008, in default of the petitioners. The restoration application has been moved on behalf of the petitioners with delay condonation application in the year 2010, that too only on behalf of petitioner No. 2 Manoj Kumar Gupta. The ground mentioned in the affidavit filed with the application does not sufficiently explain the delay in filing the restoration application. The Delay Condonation Application No. 90 of 2010 is rejected. The Restoration Application No. 34 of 2010 also stands dismissed as barred by time. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 08.03.2010 HN