IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH OCTOBER 2007 / 25TH ASWINA 1929 RP.No. 900 of 2007(L) -------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.21749/2003 Dated 01/08/2007. .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/ 3RD RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION ----------------- DR.G.MURALEEDHARA KURUP, PROFESSOR OF BIO-CHEMISTRY, SCHOOL OF BIO-SCIENCE, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY. BY ADV. SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN SRI.M.R.SASITH RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM. 3. DRI.P.K.RADHAKRISHNAN, PROFESSOR, SCHOOL OF CHEMICAL SCIENCE, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM RESIDING AT RAHDKRISHNA MANDIRAM, ADINADU NORTH P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM. BY BY ADV. SRI.T.A.SHAJI – R1 & R2 SRI. ANTONY MUKKATH - R3 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. ========================= R.P.No.900 of 2007 in W.P.(C)No.21749 of 2003 ========================= Dated this the 17th day of October, 2007. ORDER Petitioner seeks review of the judgment dated 1-8-2007. This review petition is filed with a request to bring on record certain further documents. The issues arising for consideration were considered while issuing the judgment sought to be reviewed. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the private respondent (writ petitioner) that the judgment had already been implemented. Whatever that be, there is no error apparent on the face of the judgment. No grounds are made out to sustain the application for review. Review Petition is hence dismissed. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. sl.