IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-21583 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision : 28.7.2009 Kaushalya Rani and another … Petitioners Versus State of Punjab …Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Ashok Giri, Advocate for the petitioners. Mrs.Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Mr.HNS Gill, Advocate for the complainant. Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that the petitioner-Kaushalya Rani has two sons. Both are settled abroad. After the death of her husband, she is living alone and is surviving on pension of her husband. On the other hand, learned counsel for the complainant submits that she was thrown out of her matrimonial house and have a small child. Learned State counsel on the basis of information received from Head-constable, Sarwan Singh states that recovery has been effected and the petitioner- Kaushalya Rani is no more required for custodial interrogation. In view the above, order dated 27.11.2008 passed by this Court is made absolute. The petitioner shall, however, keep on joining the investigation as and when called and shall abide by the provisions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. [ Rakesh Kumar Jain ] Judge 28.07.2009 sd