SIMQIE BFNCN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0. ^ ^-3 | OF 2005 PETITIONER pB'tSsae;; -~sss^ .*•' ^^^ <y •^ '-^^ ^•" •^^x> L® i. -i ,^" RESPONDENTS '^,\ ^,fSt^!syJ'-~:~» / ^ Dr.Balbhadra Mishra aged about 57 years S/6 Late Shri Janardan ,>^^v/ "%f.-' Mishra ,0ccupadon Senior Vaidya -•••^ . _ . _ . in South Eastem Coalfield Limited, Main Hospital Korba Resident of Subhash Block , S.E.C.L.Colony, Korba, Tahsil and District Korba (CG). VERSUS 1. Government of India , through the Secretary, Ministiy of Energy, Department of Coal, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 2. Coal India Limited, through Director (Personnel), Coal Bhawan, 10 Netaji Subhash Road Kolkata (W.B.) 3. South Eastem Coalfields Liraked, Through its Director, (Personnel), South Eastem Coalfields Limited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG). /A. The Chief General Manager, Area Office, South Eastern Coalfield Limited, Korba ,Tahsil and District Korba (CG). 5. The Chief Medical Superintendent, South Eastern Coalfield Limited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District BUaspur (CG). ^ / WRIT PETITION U/S 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^^ ••^l^ici^, 's^ftwrs. wti-Hy ... ^gi/.^ •SIlt^T^T h-i'M Sf^ sn4i'*'aft?T (t-ir ''"•"-'••^'s^'!-;^^^^^ H/- 311^1 ^giw.'gft^T '*l<lEfi4)-i WMvS ^ fsvt <iai(ril< '^ 3tpOT anwi ^J.: Slin.RupesliSlu.ivastava,cJ3Uiiselforfhepetitioner. • Shri Shaileudra Dubev, Ce4'tral Govt. Counselfor res.oondeiit no.l. Shri P.S. Koshy, counsel foj~ respoiidents no.2 to AppUcation for urgent heari^lg is allowed. Heard. Leanled counsel for the p^titioner subiuits fhat the petitioQer lias not been giveii proniotion, tliorj sublllitted that tlie uetitioner respoadent no.2, wbich has uot 1) which cuav be considered on its oi ;h he is entitled for it. It is fiirther has niade the icpresentation before ken decided so far. It is also submitted that tiie petitioner ruay be give^. an opportuiiin- pf filing tlie detailed representation before the com.pe^ent authorin" of the respoiident no.2; •vn inerits ra accordaace witti law. Haviiig considered and wfifhout expreSsiiig aay opiaion on tlie merits of tlie case, ia the opiiii^n of fhis Court, ends ofjustice will be sert'ed if a direction is given representatioti raising his grieva^ices before the. coaipetent aufhorin7 the respondent no.2 along with|a copy of the petitiou and tbis order, withui a period of one nionfh, anfl on .such representation bem.g filed, tlie ' conipetent authorih' of the respoj 1 own raerits in accordance with la1 j period of four iiiontlis from. fhe d^ ;rievance still reuiauis, the pet] uncler t±ielaw. •> Witli the aforesaid obseri'at] Certified copy as per rules. iident no..2 shaU decide the sajne on its •v as early as possible prefei'ably within s: ite of 1'eceipt of fhe re.presentation. If aiiy Ltioner m.av avail fhe reiaedv avciilable ions, this petition staiids disposed of. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [si^ ^n^T