IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE MONDAY, THE 21ST NOVEMBER 2011 / 30TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 507 of 2011(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- S.AMBILI, "SANTHAM NIVAS", TC 39/1704/1, KURIYATHI, MANACAUD PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY SMT.K.R.RIJA RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695014. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, FORT PS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695011. ADV. SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN SRI.G.SUDHEER (THURAVOOR) GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.RAMPRASAD UNNI.T THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JJ. * * * * * * * * * * * * * W.P.(Crl) No.507 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of November 2011 J U D G M E N T K.M.JOSEPH,J The petitioner has filed this writ petition alleging that her daughter Athira.M.A is illegally detained by one Vishnu of Kozhikode. Vishnu is not made a party to this writ petition. 2. Today when the matter came up, we interacted with the alleged detenue who has come to this Court on her own. We allowed the alleged detenue to interact with the petitioner. The alleged detenue would say that she is in love with Vishnu. But there is no dispute that Sri.Vishnu is not yet 21 years of age though the alleged detenue is 18 years of age. 3. The alleged detenue would say that she is prepared to go with the petitioner. She further prays that she may be permitted to be in touch with Sri.Vishnu and that they may be permitted to interact with each other. She further prays that when Vishnu becomes major and gets employment, she may be permitted to marry Vishnu. W.P.(Crl) No.507 of 2010 2 4. We interacted with the petitioner also. The petitioner is agreeable to take the daughter with her. She agrees that there can be communication between the alleged detenue and Vishnu and she will not stand in the way. She further undertakes that she will not compel the alleged detenue to marry anybody against her consent. 5. We record the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that after Vishnu becomes major and after he gets employment, the petitioner will not stand in the way of the marriage between the alleged detenue and Vishnu, if the alleged detenue insists for such marriage. Accordingly, we dispose of the writ petition by permitting the alleged detenue to go with the petitioner subject to the observations which we have made in the judgment. (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) (A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE) jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge W.P.(Crl) No.507 of 2010 3 W.P.(Crl) No.507 of 2010 4 W.P.(Crl) No.507 of 2010 5 K.M.JOSEPH & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. .No. of 200 ORDER/JUDGMENT 30/082010