1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1135 OF 2010 (Shri Jageshwar Shriramji Samarth vs. Bank of Maharashtra and another) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND F.M. REIS, JJ. DATED : APRIL 8, 2010 The Counsel for the petitioner is absent. Shri Deshpande, learned Counsel for the respondent Bank, has brought to our notice that the amount demanded vide notice dated 26/2/2010, which was issued by the respondent Bank under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 has been paid by the petitioner and there are no outstanding dues. Hence, cause of action in the petition no more survives. In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the respondent Bank, the petition 2 is disposed of as infructuous. Civil Application No.961/2010 is also disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE khj