b FORE TdE HON' LE MADHYA PRADESH ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BENCH AT RAIPUR //’ Applicant: [277K J 37>‘5/ r“ Smt. Chhanda Banerjee Wife of Shri B. Banerjee Assistant Public Relation Officer (Upper Division Teacher) Schedule Tribe, Schedule Caste Backward Class & Minority Class Welfare Department,Raipur (C.G.) V E R S U S NON APPLICANT l. x J State of Chhattisgarh Though:Secretary,Schedule Tribe,Schedule Caste,Backward & Minority Class Welfare Department,Raipur (Chhattisgarh)). The Commissioner,Schedule Caste Schedule Tribe,BacKward & Minority Class Welfare Department,Raipur (C.G.) Shri Raghuvendra Tripathi , Additional Director,Schedule Caste , Schedule Tribe , Backward & Minority Class Welfare Department,Raipur (C.G.) Shri C.S.Kotriwar Deputy Commissioner, Schedule Caste,Schedule Tribe, Backward & Minority Class Welfare Department,Raipur (C.G.) Cont'd.a.2... K @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR WP. (3) No. 3776 of 2005 Petitioner Smt. Chhanda Banerjee Versus Respondents Sate of Chhattisgarh & others SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Shri Thakur Vijay Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. V. V. S. Murthy, Deputy Advocate General with Smt. Anju Ahuja. Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondents/State. ORDER ( Passed on this 9‘" day or March. 2007) The foilowing order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. Thelpetitioner while working as Assistant Public Relation Otlicer (Upper Division Teacher) in Schedule Tribe, Schedule Caste. Backward Class & Minority Class. Welfare Department, Raipur was transferred to Jagdalpur. Baster, on the same terms and conditions vide impugned order dated 27.7.2001 (Annexure N1). 2. Since before tiling of the petition before the Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Raipur. the petitioner was already reiieved vide relieving order dated 27.7.2001 (Annexure N2). no stay was granted. 3. Be that as it may. with the passage of time this petition has become infructuous as period of transfer is not applicable forever. At this point of time there is no question to examine the validity of the transfer order. 4. in view of the above. this petition stands is dismissed. having become infructuous. No order as to costs. Sd/- =i Satish K. Agnihotri Judge [l .i‘ 'i‘u