1 cr­wp­2492­10 jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.W.P. NO. 2492 OF 2010 Anand Sidram Battul ..Petitioner Vs. Sou. Ambika Anand Battul and Anr. ..Respondents .... Mr. I.M.Khairdi Adv. for petitioner Smt. M.M.Deshmukh APP for State .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. DATE : OCTOBER 28, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned advocate for the petitioner-original accused. 2 The petitioner seeks quashing of RCC No. 298 of 2004 filed by respondent no.1 against the petitioner. The case is pending before the learned J.M.F.C. Solapur. It is under section 494 of IPC. Perusal of the complaint lodged by respondent no.1 shows that she was married to the petitioner on 14.2.1990 as per Hindu Vedic Rites. Thereafter, on 18.6.1999 she was driven out of the house and she came to know that 2 cr­wp­2492­10 on 3.3.2001 during subsistence of marriage with her, the petitioner got married to Sunita Anand Battul. As per the complaint, it is obvious that during the subsistence of the marriage of the complainant with the petitioner, he has got married to some other person. Hence, prima facie offence under Section 494 of IPC is made out. No case is made out for quashing of the complaint. 3 Application rejected. [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]