IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3582 of 2010 ***** M/s Patna Ru-1 Factory, through its proprietor Ram Kumar Singh, son of Sri Sheo Ram Singh, resident of Village Tenua, P.O. Panapur, P.S. Karghahar, District- Rohtas. …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The Bharat Cooking Coal Limited, through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Koyala Bhawan, Koyala Nagar, Dhanbad. 2. The Chief Manager (Sales), Bharat Cooking Coal Limited, Koyala Bhawan, Koyala Nagar, Dhanbad. 3. The General Manager (Sales) Coal India Limited, 15 P, Street, Kolkata- 700 016. ----------- 2. 26.2.2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The accepted position in the writ application is that there was failure on the part of the petitioner-company to lift coal from the respondents for 36 months. Supply thereafter has been stopped because of the above noted position. There is no serious explanation as to why the petitioner did not lift coal for 36 months. Merely, because some order has come to be passed by Jharkhand High Court in favour of a petitioner to reconsider the request for supply, a right does not accrue to the petitioner. In absence of any rule, policy or law having been demonstrated, which confers right upon the petitioner to seek a direction, the Court is not inclined to pass any order. If - 2 - the unit of the petitioner is still functional he may approach the respondents in terms of the prevalent policy in existence. The writ application stands dismissed with above liberty. Pawan/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)