..^' \ —^ c^cn^ BSiGS glKlsi-s- u"-^'— <" ^~lyo L- (1) PETITIQNER ^ INTHE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^^- $/2007 rii .Mahendra KumarVerma S/o Shri Bhokalu RamVerma Aged about41 years, AssistantTeacher, Govt. Hr. Sec. School, Jamgaon-R, Gunderdehi, Block - Gunderdehi, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) VERSUS Y^ State of Chhattisgarh Through:- Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2,^ District Education Officer /^y ^' V % ^ RESPONDENTS .fff\ cp' 'iu-' ^ -8' ^ ^\'^ i^ ,^v^ .^'^' <yy ^- 7 Distt. - Durg (C.G.) / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Petitioner most humbly submit as under:- HI6H COURT OF CHHATraS6ARH AT BILASPUR PetM'ioner : AAahendra (&jmar Verma Versus Respondents : State Sovemment of Oihatt-isgarh and olhers W. P. fS) No. 454 sf 2007 Petitioner : Bhuratlal Sahu Versus Respondents : State Sovemment of Chhffttisgarh and others SB: Honlte Mr. Justice Satish K. Agmhfftri. J Mr. Rakesh An'thony, Adwcate for the petiTioners. Mr. Satish Supta, Deputy fiovt. Advocnte for the respondents/Storl'e. OROER Passed on 24th doy of January, 20)7) The following order of the Court is passed by Sfltish K. Agnihotri. J. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as teamed Penal lawyer cypearing for the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts of -the present case is similar to that of in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006 (Sushil Tiwari A others Vs. 5tate 6ovt. of Chhatt-isgarh A otiiers), which was allowed vide order dated 7t November, 2006. They further submit that the question of law invoh/ed is also the same. 2. In view of the above stoted aibmissions made by teamed counsel for the parties, the writ petitions are atlowed in terms of the order dated 7th November, 2006 passed by this Court in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this onter be placed on record in connected writ petition. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge