IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1030 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 305 OF 2006 MRS. ROSADA MATILDA CRASTO AND 2 ORS., ... Applicants Versus SMT. MARTHA FURTADO AND 5 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Agnelo F. Diniz, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. N. Sardessai, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Mr. S. Vahidulla, Government Advocate for respondent nos. 3,4,5 & 6. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 29th November, 2011 P.C. Heard Shri A. F. Diniz, learned Counsel appearing for the applicants, Shri N. Sardessai, learned Counsel appearing for respondent nos.1 and 2 and Shri S. Vahidulla, learned Government Advocate for respondent nos. 3 to 6. 2. The above application is filed by the applicants under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Civil Procedure Code to enable them to rely upon the additional documents referred to at para 3 of the said application. 3. There is no dispute that the applicants were not parties to the proceedings which have been challenged in the above appeal. The applicants have been granted leave by this Court to challenge the impugned judgment and decree dated 17.08.2006. The learned Counsel appearing for the respondents in fact did not dispute the averments made in the said application. 4. As such, in the facts and circumstances of the case, I find that the applicants are entitled for leave to rely upon the said documents. Hence, the application is allowed. The applicants are permitted to rely upon the documents referred to at para 3 of the application in accordance with law. 5. The application stands disposed of accordingly. F. M. REIS, J. at*