IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.103 of 2008 (S/B) Tara Chand Ravi, …………….Petitioner. Versus Union of India & others. …………Respondents. Mr. Manoj Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Vashistha, Asst. Solicitor General for respondents 1 & 2. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Brief Holder for respondents Nos. 3,4 & 5. Ms. Beena Pandey, Standing Counsel (U.P. Govt.) for respondent No.6. JUDGMENT Coram Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. V.K. Gupta, C.J. (Oral) Mr. Manoj Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that because of intervening circumstances, this petition has been rendered infructuous. He seeks to withdraw the same with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition on the existing as well as new cause of action. Prayer allowed. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (V. K. Bist, J.) (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 05.11.2008 05.11.2008 G