IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 255 OF 2008 SHRI. SITARAM GANESH JALMI ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Mahesh Sonak,Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. S. Linhares, Addl.Govt. Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & R. C. CHAVAN, JJ. Date:- 17th September, 2008 P.C. 1. The petitioner belongs to Schedule Tribe Category and the additional affidavit in so far as the petitioner is concerned reads thus : "3. As a special case and which will not be treated as a precedent in future and especially in view of the facts that the Petitioner who is on waiting list was issued offer of appointment and has approached this Hon'ble Court on that ground, I say that the Petitioner will be offered appointment to the post of Draftsman as and when vacancy to that post arise in future in the Department. 4. Petitioner No.1 belongs to the Schedule Tribe, hence, in the first vacancy that arises in the Schedule Tribe category, Petitioner will be issued the appointment order. Hence the vacancies arising and to be filled from the Schedule Tribe category as per the roster, appointments order will be offered to Petitioner in that order upon his acceptance, he would be appointed subject to completion of other formalities." 2. We take on record this affidavit and accept the statements in paras 3 and 4 as an undertaking to this Court. 3. Parties are satisfied that the grievances of the petitioner are redressed and that the petitioner would be appointed in the first available vacancy in the category of Schedule Tribe candidates, subject to completion of other formalities. The petition is disposed of in the light of the undertaking and the agreement between the parties. Interim relief, if any, shall stand vacated. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. R. C. CHAVAN, J. SMA