WPSB No. 254 of 2011 Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J. Mr. Anurag Bisaria, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Standing Counsel for the respondent No. 6/State of Uttarakhand. In this case, the writ petitioner has been dismissed from service upon conclusion of a disciplinary proceeding. The petitioner has challenged the said proceeding in this Court by filing a Writ Petition, which is still pending. The fact remains that the petitioner, if had not been dismissed, would have served the college affiliated to Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna University, Shrinagar until 11th September, 2011, therefore, in the present Writ Petition the writ petitioner is seeking to contend that by virtue of the reasons furnished in the judgment rendered in Writ Petition No. 52 of 2010 (S/B) his age of superannuation would also stand increased to 65 years. To that extent, it appears to us that the petitioner is right, therefore, in the event, petitioner succeeds in the writ petition filed by him challenging the order of dismissal, while the petitioner would return to service, he shall also be entitled to continue to serve in the college until he attains the age of 65 years. (U.C. Dhyani, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 08.12.2011 kaushal