IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17714 of 2011 MALIK ANSARI SON OF SARFUDDIN ANSARI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BARADIH, POLICE STATION- AGRER, DISTRICT- ROHTAS. …..PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ….OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 02. 15.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is accused for offences punishable under Sections 304/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the accused persons is that on the direction of the contractor one of the accused persons asked the deceased to connect the electric wire and in course of the said work Rinku died due to electric shock. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that, in the said circumstances no allegation for any offence under Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code is made out and in any view of the matter the petitioner neither being the contractor nor being the person asking the deceased to connect the wire, there was no occasion for implicating the petitioner. He further submits that in the same circumstances another co-accused has been released on bail vide order dated 25.04.2011 (annexure-2) passed by a Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 12814 of 2011. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender of the petitioner, namely, Malik Ansari within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in the 2 court below, he shall be admitted to bail on executing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000.00 (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (Agrer) P.S. Case No. 196 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Devendra/ ( S.N. Hussain, J.)