IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 341 OF 2010 SHRI. DATTARAM TANU GAUNS @ KANKONKAR AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR AND 9 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Prashant Vengurlekar,Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr.A. Kamat, Addl. Government Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1,2,5,7 and 10. Mr. M. S. Sonak, Advocate for the Respondent No.9. Coram:- A. S. OKA & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 30th June, 2010 P.C.:- Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners, the learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for Respondent Nos.1, 2,5,7 and 10 and the learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent No.9. We find that a remedy of filing a suit for recovery of possession is available to the Petitioners. Apart from that, the Petitioners have applied for review of order dated 5th December, 2006 passed by the Inspector of Survey and Land Records, City Survey, Panaji. The said Review Petition will have to be decided. It is also brought to our notice that Dy. Collector (Revenue), Collectorate of North Goa, has issued a memorandum to the Mamlatdar of Tiswadi, Panaji Goa, to go through the complaint filed by the Petitioners and to submit his detailed report. Considering the pendency of Review Petition and availability of remedy of a Civil Suit, this is not a case where the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India can be invoked at this stage. 2. We, therefore, reject the Petition by keeping all the contentions of the parties open. We direct that the pending review Petition shall be decided as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from today. A. S. OKA, J. F. M. REIS, J. at*