IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3466 of 2010 DR. SMT. VEENA SINGH, WIFE OF SRI ANIL KUMAR, RESIDENT OF BHAIROPUR DEODHI, MOHALLA MOHANPUR ROAD, PUNAICHAK, P.S. SHASTRI NAGAR, DISTRICT- PATNA, AT PRESENT RESEARCH FELLOW, JAGJIVAN RAM INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY STUDIES AND POLITICAL RESEARCH, 10, MANGLES ROAD, PATNA :---PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 2. MR. ANJANI KUMAR SINGH, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCS DEVELOPMENT, VIKASH BHAWAN, NEW SECRETARIAT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. MR. K.K.PATHAK, THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, VIKASH BHAWAN, NEW SECRETARIAT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. MR. ONKAR NATH PATHAK, THE JOINT SECRETARY CUM DIRECTOR, HIGHER EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, VIKASH BHAWAN, NEW SECRETARIAT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 5. MR. S.N.ARYA, THE DEPUTY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, VIKASH BHAWAN, NEW SECRETARIAT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 6. JAGJIVAN RAM INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY STUDIES AND POLITICAL RESEARCH, 10 MANGLES ROAD, PATNA THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR-IN-CHARGE. 7. MR. SAROJ KUMAR DIWEDI, THE DIRECTOR-IN-CHARGE, JAGJIVAN RAM INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY STUDIES AND POLITICAL RESEARCH, 10 MANGLES ROAD, PATNA. 8. MR. S.N.KUMAR, THE SCREENING COMMITTEE CONSTITUTED FOR JAGJIVAN RAM INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY STUDIES AND POLITICAL RESEARCH, 10 MANGLES ROAD, PATNA THROUGH ITS CONVENER, SRI S.N.KUNWAR, THE THEN DIRECTOR, HIGHER EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, VIKASH BHAWAN, PATNA :---OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 09.05.2011. In compliance of the orders of the High Court dated 09.11.2009 passed in C.W.J.C.No. 10981 of 2009, Annexure-1 Principal Secretary of the Department has passed order dated 06.05.2010 stating that unless the petitioner and other employees of Jagjivan Ram Institute of Parliamentary Studies and Political Research are taken over against the sanctioned post they cannot be allowed the benefit of the 5th/6th Pay Revision. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to proceed any further with the contempt petition, which is disposed of, however, with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid order dated 06.05.2010. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)