IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2010 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Mat.Appeal.No. 5 of 2005() -------------------------------- OP.838/1997 of FAMILY COURT,TRIVANDRUM .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER ------------------------------ JAYACHANDRAN NAIR S/O. VELUPILLAI, KAMALA SADANAM, PARASUVAIKKAL, PARASSALA, NOW RESIDING AT QUARTERS NO.G.19A, S.A.P.QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------------------- R.JAYASREE, SASTHU BHAVAN, PAPPANAMCODE JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 BY ADVS. SRI.J.HARIKUMAR SRI.HARIKUMAR.S. SRI.VIPIN VISWANATH THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- MAT Appeal No.5 of 2005 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st December, 2010 JUDGMENT Basant, J. This appeal is preferred by the appellant aggrieved by the impugned order passed by the Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram in O.P.No.838/1997. The appellant/ petitioner had claimed 2/3rd rights in the property standing in the name of the respondent herein. 2. The parties have appeared before us. They, in the presence of their counsel, have settled all their outstanding disputes. The subject matter of this appeal is also settled by an agreement between the parties. They, accordingly agreed and we record the stipulations of the agreement below. i) The impugned order can be upheld. ii) The respondent agrees that she shall, within a period of three months from this date, execute a document settling title in the plaint schedule property including the building in the name of Sasthu Dev, the minor child born Mat.A.No.5/2005 2 to them reserving a life estate in her favour. 3. Parties agree that this appeal can accordingly be disposed of accepting the above terms. 4. A draft of this order was handed over to the counsel and parties and they have approved these stipulations. 5. In the result, a) This appeal is allowed in part and the impugned order is upheld. b) The respondent is directed to execute a document settling rights in the plaint schedule property in the name of their son Sasthu Dev reserving a life estate in her favour. R.BASANT JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE css/