s~ c^ PETITIONER IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETITION (S) N0. iCO OF 2011 SiNGlE Shiv Shanker Kutare, S/o Late Shri Ukha I?am Kutare, Aged about 48 Years, Asst. Superintendant O/o Collector, Narayanpur-(C.G.) VERSUS : 1. ' State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Revenue Department Mantralaya Raipur-(C.G.) RESPONDENTS <- ^^y ^ '^^" y^>"" ^^ ^ ^y 2.<^ C.G. Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd., Through - The Managing Director, Shastri Chowk, Raipur-(C.G-) WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA I-HC-22 •^ SfI^I'W R-ii'* sn^i ?ti+ii=ti ^riiff 2\ -3^ ..illAllcl-q, ((•dly'lrf. facll'M1? siiit?T^ra? ^..?.i^.^-s'..;..^'E'f^ > ^^^................^ay..............^, ^^ W<11 sbiflch fq^I' w^y ^wwatet SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohaili Shrivastaya.J. 1041.2011 Shri Keshav Dewangan, Shri Sushil Dubey, No.1 onadvance copy. Heard. This petition has been communication dated 22/4/10 Manager (Head Quarter) for Development Corporation Ltd. has ir(ft that in view of order dated 18/07/0^ be entitled to saiary, till the date of Leamed counsel for e not attend duties w.e.f. 1/4/08 on petitioner submitted hls joining on aiso submitted application for granf 1/4/08 to 16/6/08. Learned counsel joined his duties on 24/07/08 and entitied to his salary, but paymetit respondents, as indicated from From the pleadings .and petrtioner after having been and he submitted his joining on application for grant of leave on Under these cireumstances, it Director, Chhattisgarh lnfrastructure[ frdm transferifed ctiT<rf<n<iii Mw<?if ^ 'fsTst <^i«i< ^; sifSgq aii^n courlsei for the pectioner. Govemr<ient Advocate for the State/respondent ffled by the petittoner aggrieved by (Ai|inexure P/1) by which the Divrstonal Mana|ing Director, Chhattisgarh tnfrasiructure ir(formed the Coltector, District Narayanpur (Annexure P/3), the petnioner would not r^lieving tor District ofRce, Narayanpur. peti(ioner submitted that the petUoner eouid <ne<jical grounds and after rasovery, the 17/6/08 along with fitness certiflcate and of leave in respect of the period from for the petitioner submitted that he had that date, till date of hte relieving, he is of saiary has been denied by the impubned communication. on record, it appears that the from 1/4/08, did not present for duties along with medical certificates and medpcal grounds. '^ would be proper to direct the Managing [Development Corporation Ltd. to decide e^idence 24/71/2008 medlcat [J^ tf^^ ..,ffaSSS-^ 'lS^ESSt. ^I-HC-22 sn^i^ii [<•)[* sn^i ^i^ich +rf^T -ysf ^Hld^, ®Til'y'is.filcliuy sni?r.'ira'g? (Gf(&) 1^-0 .&G/^<t>tf "W^' 200 *ii*«iiaxiicb I^^ST' sn^i'Rgiwtiftg —5' petitioner's applicaUon for grant petitioner's ciaim for saiary would taken on petitioner's Vtfith the aforesaid observa teave as per applicable leave ruies. The yso be declded on the basisofthe decision application fcjr grant of leave. (ions, the petition is finally disposed off. Sdi'- MaiHndra Mohan Shrivastava Judge CM<ii<n<ili 7TPRff ^ fsxst <Rf|^l< ^ 3lf:(iH 3fI^I [Tft^^fea •n-ii—n