:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3622 OF 2003. SUIT NO. 3622 OF 2003. SUIT NO. 3622 OF 2003. Kantilal Otarmal. ..Plaintiff. VERSUS. Parimal Rajnikant Shah & Anr. ..Defendants. **** S. Bawaria i/b T. Gordia & Hrushikesh Nikumbh Associates for the plaintiff. None for the defendants. Coram: Coram: Coram: V.M.KANADE, J. V.M.KANADE, J. V.M.KANADE, J. Date: Date: Date: August 23, 2004. August 23, 2004. August 23, 2004. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff has filed affidavit of service of Shri. S. B. Rane, bailiff to the Sheriff of Bombay and has also filed the affidavit of one Shri. S. W. Bhadale in which it is stated that the defendant was served. The original writ of summons is also annexed to the affidavit. 2. The plaintiff has tendered original documents which are marked Exhibit "A" collectively. 3. Present suit is based on bill of exchange which was dishonoured after demand was made by the plaintiff. The bill of exchange was notified. The suit is therefore decreed in terms of the prayers. Refund of court fees as permitted under the rules. (V.M.KANADE,J.) (V.M.KANADE,J.) (V.M.KANADE,J.) /2004/