IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-13566 of 2009 Date of decision: May 28, 2009 Naveen Hans -Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & another -Respondents Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta Present: Ms. Poonam Tara, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Shilesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Munish Behl, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Rajan Gupta, J.(Oral) Counsel for the petitioner states that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties and the entire matrimonial dispute has been amicably resolved. However, State counsel submits that the matter is still under investigation and the factum of compromise, if any, shall be taken into consideration by the Investigating Officer. Counsel further submits that in case the complainant stands by her version, in all likelihood the cancellation report would be submitted before the court of competent jurisdiction. In view of the above, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. [Rajan Gupta] Judge May 28, 2009. 'ask'