*1* IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10352/2009 Eknath Bhivaji Pagare. ..Petitioner -VERSUS- Indubai Popat Pagare and others. ..Respondents ............... Mr.G.S.Godbole, Advocate i/b Ms.Pallvi Dabholkar, for the Petitioner. ............... CORAM: A.P. DESHPANDE, J. Dated 09th December, 2009. PC:- 1 The present Petitioner is the original Defendant No.1 against whom an order of temporary injunction has been passed by the Trial Court, in a suit filed by the Plaintiff for injunction. While granting temporary injunction, a finding of fact is recorded by the Trial Court in favour of the Plaintiff that he is in possession of the suit property. Miscellaneous Appeal preferred by the present Petitioner has been dismissed by the first Appellate Court by concurring with the view taken by the Trial Court. It is this order which is challenged by filing the present Writ Petition. Temporary injunction is operating against the Petitioner for last three years. 2 Perused the impugned order, the same takes possible view of the matter and does not call for any interference. 3 The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that *2* having regard to the controversy involved in the suit, it would be in furtherance of cause of justice to direct the Trial Court to expeditiously dispose of the suit uninfluenced by the observations made either in this order or the orders passed by the Courts below granting temporary injunction. 4 It is obvious that the orders passed on temporary injunction application including this order deals with the issue prima facie and would not weigh the Court while deciding the suit on merit. Thus, having regard to the controversy, I direct the Trial Court to decide the suit as expeditiously as possible uninfluenced by this order. 5 Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. (A.P. Deshpande, J)