..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2888 OF 2008 Uday Dashrathrao Patil. ..Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Prashant Kulkarni, Adv. for the applicant Mr.Pramod Kathane, Adv. for Respondents. Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 23rd September, 2008. DATED : 23rd September, 2008. DATED : 23rd September, 2008. P.C.: 1. Leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant-orig.complainant, the learned Advocate for the respondent-orig.accused and the learned APP for the State. 3. The respondent No.3 is accused in C.R.No.99 of 2008 registered by Akluj police station. The said case is under Section 498-A, 304B of IPC. 4. The respondent No.3 preferred an application ..(2).. for anticipatory bail before the Sessions Court at Malshiras. Interim protection came to be granted to respondent No.3 by the Sessions Court. Being aggrieved by the said order this application has been preferred. 5. The grievance of the applicant is that the said application for anticipatory bail has been kept pending since a long time and interim protection has been granted to respondent No.3 and extended from time to time. The case of the applicant is that the custody of respondent No.3 is necessary and hence interim protection ought not to have been granted to respondent No.3. 6. After hearing the parties, I am of the opinion that it would be appropriate if directions are issued that Criminal Misc.Application No.103 of 2008 i.e. application for anticipatory bail preferred by respondent No.3 before the Sessions Court at Malshiras is disposed of as expeditiously as possible and in any event by 29th September, 2008. 7. With the above direction, Criminal Application is disposed. ..(3).. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)