IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44090 of 2007 RAJESH PRASAD, son of late Rajbansh Prasad, resident of Mohalla – Takia Bazar, P S – Sasaram Town, District – Rohtas at Sasaram (wrongly mentioned as Rajesh Paswan in FIR) Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Rajendra Paswan, son of late Haribans Paswan, resident of Ambedkar Nagar, Takia, Ward no.1, P S – Sasaram, District – Rohtas at Sasaram. ----------- 04. 30.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for opposite party No.2 and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is seeking quashing of the FIR which is Sasaram P S Case No. 339 of 2007 dated 2.8.2007. It is submitted that petitioner is a practising lawyer and the present case has been filed as a way of vengeance against him. I have been informed that investigation is still on in the matter and the same has not reached its finality as yet. In that view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to quash the FIR whatever the status of the petitioner, but petitioner may have liberty to take remedial measure as he feels, which may be available to him, at an appropriate stage, time or legal advice which may be rendered to him. The application is dismissed. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)