1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.385 OF 2005 Shri Adi Shakti Hindi Prachar Samiti and Anr. ..Petitioners. V/s. Secretary, State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.C.K.Thomas i/b C.K.Thomas & Associates for petitioners. Mr.A.H.Palekar, AGP. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : APRIL 18, 2006. DATE : APRIL 18, 2006. DATE : APRIL 18, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. It is fairly accepted by the counsel for the petitioners that the proposal of the petitioners has been finally decided by the State Government. Indeed, there is delay in taking that decision. The direction of the Division Bench in order dated 4th August, 2005 was to take decision on or before 31st October, 2005. But the decision has been taken belated. Even so, it will be inappropriate to initiate contempt action merely for some delay, which cannot be said to be wilful non-compliance and/or wilful disobedience. Hence dismissed.