IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2971 of 2010 OM PRAKASH PANDEY Versus THE HINDUSTAN PETRO.CORPN.LTD. & ORS ----------- 2 19.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ application at this stage seems to be misplaced because no mandamus is required to be issued on the respondents as there is no failure to perform the public duty so far. This is being observed in the background that the petitioner has not approached the respondent Corporation for the grievance and allegation against the selection carried out by the Corporation. Even otherwise there is in-built redressal of mechanism laid down in the guidelines issued by the Corporation, let the petitioner make a pointed objection to the selection and the respondents designated authority would be bound to respond to the same within the time frame fixed in the guidelines. This writ application is disposed of with the above liberty. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)