IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9494 of 2005 MOST. NIRMALA DEVI wife of Late Banarsi Ram, resident of Mohalla-Dagwar Toli, Ward No.9, Rosera, P.S.-Rosera, Dist.-Samastipur. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.The Rosera Municipality, Rosera, Dist.-Samastipur through its Executive Officer 3.The Executive Officer, Rosera Municipality, Rosera, Dist.-Samastipur ----------- 4. 20.1.2011. Heard Mr. Kumar Praveen, Learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the State. Despite service of notice on respondent nos.2 and 3 i.e. the Rosera Municipality, Rosera, the Municipality has preferred not to appear. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 30.9.2003 as Safai Mazdoor from Rosera Municipality, Rosera, district Samastipur, has prayed for directing the respondent- Municipality to make payment of her retiral dues. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite filing of representation before respondent no.3 i.e. the Executive Officer, Rosera Municipality, Rosera, nothing has been paid to the petitioner till date. The petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.3. If such representation is filed, the respondent no.3 is directed to examine the same and pass appropriate order for redressing all the 2 grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. In case of refusal, the respondent no.3 is directed to pass a speaking order within the aforesaid time. The respondent no.3 is also directed to provide detailed statement in respect of claim as well as payment to the petitioner. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)