THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.5203 of 2011 Date:01st December, 2011 Between: Goggi Pedda Obaiah @ Yerranna S/o.G.C. Obaiah & Anr. ..... Petitioners AND Bobburi Balaiah S/o.B.V.Ganganna .....Respondent *** THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.5203 of 2011 ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 23.09.2010, passed in E.P.No.25 of 2007 in O.S.No.61 of 2001 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Proddatur, Kadapa District, whereby and whereunder, the learned Senior Civil Judge over-ruled the objections of the judgment debtors and ordered for filing S.Ps. and E.Cs. relatable to the E.P. schedule property. 2. The petitioners are the judgment debtors and the respondent is the decree holder. E.P. has been filed by the decree holder for realization of the decretal amount by sale of the E.P. schedule property. The judgment debtors filed counter resisting the same stating that the property does not belong to them. The decree holder got himself examined as PW.1 and marked two documents as Exs.A1 and A2. On behalf of the judgment debtors, they got themselves examined as RW.1 and R.W.2 The learned Senior Civil Judge, on considering the material brought on record and on hearing the counsel appearing for the parties, over-ruled the objections of the judgment debtors, by order, dated 23.09.2010. Hence, this revision. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/judgment debtors and perused the order impugned in the revision. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/judgment debtors submits that the petitioners/judgment debtors are not the owners of the property and therefore, the property cannot be ordered to be auctioned for realization of the decretal amount passed in O.S.No.61 of 2001. 5. The decree holder besides examining himself as PW.1, placed on record two documents, which have been marked as Exs.A1 and A2. The documents placed on record by the decree holder are: (1) No.3 Adangal issued by the Mandal Revenue Officer, Chapadu, and (2) Encumbrance Certificate. Though the judgment debtors took the plea that they are not the owners of the E.P. schedule property, they did not speak as to who is the owner of the E.P. schedule property. The executing Court keeping in view the evidence of PW.1 and Exs.A1 and A2, proceeded to over-rule the objections raised by the judgment debtors. I do not see any illegality or irregularity in the order impugned in the revision warranting interference of this Court in exercise of powers under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed at the admission stage. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:01st December, 2011. cs THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.5203 of 2011 Date:01st December, 2011