1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.12/2009 Vandana wd/o Shriramji Jibhkate ...Versus... The State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Mohadi, Dist. Bhandara and another -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri B.N. Mohta, Adv. for applicant] [Shri O.D. Kakde, APP for respdt. No.1] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 06.02.2009 Office has objected on the ground that second revision filed by the applicant is not maintainable. Objection is upheld in view of bar of Section 397 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned Counsel for the applicant states that revision would be maintainable because the Sessions Judge held that the revision was not maintainable before him. Whatsoever it may be, fact remains that the order of the trial Court is challenged before the revisional 2 Sessions Judge and the Sessions Judge dismissed the revision. Therefore, second revision cannot lie. Hence, office objection is upheld. This revision be treated as one under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and register accordingly. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.140/2009 Issue notice returnable on 20.03.2009. JUDGE ssw