g w%xnv%,_ a IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER VERS US RESPONDENTS a“ x/ Smt.Sushila Soma W/o Shri. Dicson Soma, aged about 54 years, Working as Assistant Teacher E.B.A. Mission Middle School, Jagdalpur, District—Bastar (CG) . State OfChhattisgarh, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of gcool Education, p Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, District—Raipur (CG) DEEMED FIT- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR / THE ISSUANCE MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER WRIT ORDER OR DIRECTIONS 1. Particulars ofthe Petitioner- . Director, Director of Public Instruction, Pensan Bada, District-Raipur (CG) . District Education Officer Jagdalpur District-Bastar (CG) (/F \ 572/ $§t§€r§sE EENEH WRIT PETITION (S) Nosgéé/zmo SB m: ’i Grievance of the petitione‘ two advance increments but the her for no reasons. He submit have been decided by this Cou permitted to file a reptesentation tited by the petitioner as Annexu Counsei for the petitioner Supreme Court in the case of ethers, 2009 (iii) MPJR (SC) 59 the case of Yashwant Ku Corporation, Durg & Anothr! case of Saiit Kant $ingh Vs. WP. ($) No.6257lzoa8, wherein has been granted on the basis i aiso appiicabie to the case of th to extend benefit to those who i Training, iike the petitioner. He permitted to Withdraw this representation before the respor in accordance with iaw. is that though she is entitied for same has not been passed on to that number of identicai matters where the petitioners have been copy of one such order has been P-6. bmits that the judgment of the sha Saxena Vs. State cf MP. & and orders passed by this Court in ar Bharciwa' Vs. Munici G06 (2} MPJR-CJ $6 and in the State of Chhattisgarh & others, benetit of two advance increments hat B.Ed. degree was obtained, is a petitioner, as the circulars sought tad obtained Diploma of Teaching further submits that he may be petition with iiberty to make tdent No. 3 for deciding the same u al mmwP@N°.g.é& zoo 311%31W (Wu) m m fawm' ammm mm Rfsa 311%?! S3: HON’BLE JGST§CE MR. PRmNKER mWAKER G8-19-2G1a: Shri Azad Siddiqui, ccuns l for the pet§tionet Shri Vaibhav Gaverdhan, .L. for the State. XLHC 78 WWW WWW mm 1.“; WV 200 m W (We) mm um amt v—Z/ On the other hand, counse‘ no objection if the petitioner mal is decided in accordance with la\ in View of above, the petit’ petition with liberty to file represi 3 and in turn the respondent representation so filed, in accorc wwwz¥f§ém $afmsmé¥1 for the State submits that he has (es a representation and the same v. oner is permitted to withdraw this entation before the respondent No. No. 3 is expected to decide the / / ance with law/ r/ Sd/‘ Pritinker Diwaker Judge