: 1 : FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.983 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s . orders or directions and . Registrar’s orders . -------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.P.P. Goyal for the Appellant. Mr.J.D. Khaimas for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 29TH SEPTEMBER, 2008. P.C. : 1. The impugned order warrants no interference. By an order dated 13.12.2007 the amount was to be deposited within three months. Admittedly, the Appellant/Defendant failed to do so. It is stated that the Appellant had filed a Special Leave Petition. However, no extension of time was granted by the Supreme Court while dismissing the S.L.P. 2. It is alleged that Exhibit-45 which is at page 33 of the compilation was : 2 : filed before the trial Court seeking leave to deposit the amount. The alleged application is dated 10.6.2008. The trial Court naturally could not entertain this application as it was beyond the time stipulated by the order of this Court. There is no application to this Court for extension of time to comply with the order dated 13.12.2007. It was necessary for the Appellant to file an application seeking extension of time to deposit the amount before this Court. 3. On behalf of the Respondent, it is denied that Exhibit-45 as annexed to the present Appeal from Order was at all filed. It is contended by the Respondent that only the application for taking the matter on board was filed. As I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order, it is not necessary for me to opine on this aspect. If an application for extension is made by the Appellant, it will be open to the Respondent to raise this issue to oppose the same. : 3 : 4. In the circumstances, the Appeal from Order is dismissed.