IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9093 of 2009 1. SURENDRA PASWAN 2. RUDAL PASWAN 3. INDAL PASWAN ------ PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 13.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that for purchased iron rod petitioners have been apprehending their arrest in a case for theft of the same and its recovery. Photostat copy of the receipt is filed in the case. Its genuineness can be verified by the trial court but at the moment in my opinion, petitioners’ arrest cannot be justified as they claim to have seized iron rod. I agree with the same. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Kanti P.S.Case No.1 of 2009, the above named three petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- divisional Judicial Magistrate, West Muzaffarpur, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI