1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8318 OF 2009 Ramchandra Mahadev Revale .. Petitioner versus Ramesh Baurao Yerunkar & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Rajesh More for the petitioner. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 5th October 2009. P.C: . The recording of evidence has already commenced. Therefore, this is not a stage when this Court can interfere under Article 227 of the Constitution of India as the petitioner can always challenge the impugned order while preferring an appeal against the decree passed in the suit if the same be adverse to the petitioner. 2. Moreover, the petitioner has already pleaded that he is the owner of the House No.27. The said averment forms part of paragraph 7 of his written statement. The petitioner can always lead evidence regarding location of the said House No.27 and its area. Subject to what is observed above, no interference is called for at this stage. Accordingly, petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA,J)