IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 13TH JULY 2010 / 22ND ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 21660 of 2010(F) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SANDHYA K.NAIR,W/O.AJITH, AGED 30 YEARS HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT-ENGILISH RANNI-PERUNAD HIGH SCHOOL,PATHANAMTHITTA-689711. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM-1 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, TRIVANDRUM-14. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER POST PATHANAMTHITTA-689711. 4. THE MANAGER, RANNI-PERUNAD HIGH SCHOOL, POST PATHANAMTHITTA-689711. 5. SMT.S.DEEPTHI, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTATN (SOCIAL STUDIES) RANNI-PERUNAD HIGH SCHOOL, POST PATHANAMTHITTA-689711. BY G.P.SRI.DILIP MOHAN FOR R1 TO R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ---------------------------- W.P.(C)No.21660 of 2010 ---------------------------- Dated 13th July, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner was appointed as High School Assistant (English) in the 4th respondent's school from 1.6.2005 as per Ext.P1. Ext.P1 would also reveal that the said appointment was approved. However, as per Ext.P2 staff fixation order for the year 2008-2009 the petitioner was converted as HSA (Physical Science). Aggrieved by the said order of the third respondent, appeal was preferred before the 2nd respondent. As per Ext.P3 the said appeal was rejected. Against Ext.P3 order the petitioner has filed Ext.P4 revision petition before the Government. In the meanwhile, the third respondent issued Ext.P5 staff fixation order for the year 2009-2010. As per the same, the petitioner was again treated as HSA (English) for the year 2009-2010. Later, relying on Ext.P3 the third respondent modified Ext.P5 without notice to the petitioner and ordered to treat the petitioner again as HSA (Physical Science) as per Ext.P6 order. Against Ext.P6 order also the petitioner has moved the Government. Ext.P7 is the revision petition filed against Ext.P6. In short, Exts.P4 and P7 revision WP(C).No.21660/2010 2 petitions filed by the petitioner are now pending before the first respondent. Considering the fact that Exts.P4 and P7 revision petitions are pending before the Government, I do not think it necessary to look into the merits of the contentions at this stage. Therefore, without making any observation as to the merits of the contentions raised by the petitioner in this writ petition, it is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P4 and P7 revision petitions expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, with notice to the petitioner and respondents 4 and 5. C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS