IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13373 of 2007 PURUSHOTTAM THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02- 19.5.2008 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add to the array of respondents who is represented by Mr. S N Pathak. 2. Heard Ms. Nutan Sahay for the petitioner, learned Government Counsel for respondent nos.1 and 3, Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned AAG III for respondent nos. 2 and 4, and Mr. S N Pathak for respondent no.5. This writ petition has been preferred for a direction to respondent nos. 2 and 4 (Bihar School Examination Board) to publish the petitioner’s result for the Teachers’ Training Examination for the academic session 1988-90, the examinations of which were conducted by respondent nos. 2 and 4 in 1991. This writ petition was lodged in this Court on 8.10.2007. It suffers from unexplained delay, laches, negligence, and acquiescence. It is a frivolous writ petition and is accordingly dismissed. mrl (S K Katriar )