IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-11983 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 25, 2011 Irfan ….Petitioner Versus State of Haryana … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This is a petition seeking anticipatory bail in case F.I.R. No. 96 dated 11.03.2011, under Sections 420/506 IPC, registered at Police Staion Saran, District Faridabad. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in the present case, petitioner has negotiated to purchase the property from Shyam Lal, who has ensured the petitioner that he is having general power of attorney from his son Raj Kumar and is authorized to negotiate on behalf of Raj Kumar. Thereafter, Shyam Lal has produced one imposter posing him as Raj Kumar and executed agreement to sell in favour of the petitioner and that imposter was identified by Crl. Misc. No.M-11983 of 2011 Smt. Bala alleged wife of Raj Kumar. He has taken me to the page No. 23 and 24 of the petition. Alleged Bala has stated that she has signed the sale deed and has identified the imposter as her husband Raj Kumar, believing her own father-in-law that if she identifies that imposter then she will get widow pension. On the face of it, story set up seems to be totally false, fabricated and unbelievable. Alleged Bala can not in normal course, identify the imposter as her husband, believing that she identified the imposter as she will be getting widow pension. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that on the basis of the deed executed by said Raj Kumar in favour of the petitioner, he has entered into the agreement to sell in favour of the complainant. Prima facie petitioner himself admits that he has got deed executed in his favour not from the real Raj Kumar, who has died prior to the sale deed. Matter requires thorough investigation for which custodial interrogation is must. Dismissed. April 25, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2