V€SS /lffS,/ tNTHB HtGK COCRT OP JODIC&TURB AT BOASPCR (C.G.J WRIT PETITIQN N0. 28 6< Qp 2006 PE'nTIOWER: Smt. Kiranlata Damle, W/Q Dr. S.K. Damle, Aged about 44 years, Presently working as Assistant Professor (Zoology) and NCC Ofiicer, Govemmeat Digvijay College, Rajnandgaon, District-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus RESPQNDENTS: 1. State ofChfaattfsgarh, Through its Secretary, Deparftnuent of Higher Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipi.tr (C.G.) 2. Commissioner, Higfaer Education, Mantralaya; D.K.S. BhaTflg^i, Raipur (C.G.) ^^~[^r .^ 3- Principal, • ^ <z,\ i,^ < Govemment Digrijay Coltege, ^» ^^ Rajnandgaon, District-Rajnand^ton (C.G.) vnxrr PWITIOW tnro®tARCTCI.E 226/227 OF THE COirSTITCTIOW OF SSDVA POR ISSOMICB OP WRIT m THE NA'TORE OF MMTDAMOS. C®lTIOR*Rt,PRQHIBITIOB A»D FOR OTSES. svrrAStEVsn OR W«ITS.QRO&R OR ORDERS. DIRECTION OR WXSSCTtOTSS. XI-HC-78 3^.<ii<<id<i, yxf1y<|g, Ric)iy^< W^\ sbNi* ^f^...^.^.^^- 200 ^ •sn^rq'ra?(i^crf^^T) 3n^T?irf?;iR; cwan^rgiiii^ STareK.Bf^a'sn^T wrfepfrr iWRff ^'te^t <fSrerc ^i'srf^q'sn^T :A? < Shri Ashish Shrivastava, coun^el for the petitroner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Gov|t. Advocate for the State/respondents, on advancecopy. Heard both the counsel. By the instant petitlon, the (jietitioner has challenged her transfer order Annexure-P/2 whereby the fetitioner has been transferred from Government Digvijay College, Rs|jnandgaon to Government Coll^e, Kurud, District Dhamtari. The main ground oif cha!te(ige is that apart from the Assistant Professor, she is also working as NpC Offlcer and as perthe Government Circular Annexure.P/1 dated 18-2-56, 12-2-98, 10-5-2000, thetransfer of NCC officers cannot be made withojiit seeking priorapprovat ofthe Deputy Director General, NCC. Learned eounset for the pe1 been made in viotation of the ab petitioner may be allowed to mat Woner submitted that the transfer has ive Government orders, as such, the s a representation to the respondent No.1 and he be directed to decidelthe same, to which leamed counsel for the respondents has no objection. Having heard leamed coun^el for the parties, having regard to the fiacts and cireumstances of the ca^e and without eiq^ressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the pr^yer made by learned counsel for the peBtioner is just, fair and reasonafsle. Therefore, the petitioner !s allowed to make a detailed representation ]along with a copy of this petition to the respondent No.1 raising all her gri^vances within a period of 10 days from today and in fajrn, respondent Noj1 shall decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of 30|days from the date of receipt of the P.T.O. XI-HC-78 *IIHWI a>w* 3^? •<1l<<lf1<l, E?Tf1+l'l6, Rx'll'Hy ,.^?.3.^.^. ^r 200 311^1 4^cb (yit^q^T) 3n^r?irR^ gsnsn^rgOTq; c Barve <% ?TBTWBf5cT3I^ST •^. representation, after considering a| accordance with iaw. In the meantime, the effect ^i respect of the petitioner shall rem^iin petitioner is decided. With the direction aforesaid, ConsequenUy, M.(W.)P. Nf>. also stand disposed of. Parties are entitted for certifi^d copy ofthls order. °bl<lt<1<l1-< Hmcff ff IWt <R|<^]< ^isrf^irsn^T the points ralsed by the petitioner, in ind operation of the impugned order in in stayed, till the representetion of the he petttion stands disposed of. ).3021/2006 and t.A. No.7348/2006 Srff- L.C. ahsetBO judge P.T.O. '& fSS.