IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 2016 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 22.03.2011 Puran Singh ....Petitioner Vs. Kala Singh ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL ****** Present:- Mr. N.S. Wahniwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 24.01.2011 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Moga, whereby the application under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC filed by the defendant-petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'the petitioner'), was dismissed. The counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the document Ex.P3, sought to be produced by the plaintiff during the evidence, is tampered with as the copy of the document, already produced by him on the record, is not attested by the Notary. The Court could well examine the documents at the time of arguments. However, the petitioner could also explain the interpolations during his evidence by calling the Clerk of the Notary. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. (A.N.JINDAL) 22nd of March, 2011 JUDGE ajp