Crl. Rev. No.271 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Rev. No.271 of 2011 Date of Decision: 19.04.2011 Liyakat ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Satish Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, D.A.G., Haryana for the respondent-State. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a revision petition against the order dated 14.01.2011 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nuh, whereby, the appeal of the petitioner was dismissed with some modifications. The orders of sentence was modified to the extent that both the substantive sentences awarded to the petitioner shall run concurrently, as well as, the order of conviction dated 20.05.2009 and order of sentence dated 22.05.2009 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Ferozepur Jhirka. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner, did not argue on merits but has placed reliance on the judgment dated 30.03.2011 passed in CRR No.534 of 2011. As per the said judgment and order dated 30.03.2011 passed in the case of co-accused, the sentence has been Crl. Rev. No.271 of 2011 2 reduced to four months while enhancing the fine from ` 10,000/- to ` 25,000/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that since the case of the petitioner is identical, the same is covered by the aforesaid judgment. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has not been able to dispute the said factual position and has placed on record the custody certificate. The same is taken on record. As per the Custody Certificate, the petitioner has already undergone four months and ten days as on 18.04.2011. In view of the above, this Court deem it proper to reduce the sentence of the petitioner to that of already having undergone, whereas, the fine is enhanced from ` 10,000/- to ` 25,000/-. Ordered accordingly. The petitioner be released forthwith. However, in case, the fine is not deposited within a period of two months from his release, the present revision petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed and the petitioner shall liable to be arrested to serve out remaining part of the sentence. Disposed of as above. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 19.04.2011 JUDGE gurpreet