C.S. No. 21 of 2005 05.01.2011 Present:- Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, counsel for the plaintiff. Mr. Suneet Goel, counsel for defendant No.2. On 3.12.2010 the case was adjourned for recording the evidence of the plaintiff on payment of cost of ` 2,000/-. Perusal of order dated 3.12.2010 indicates that plaintiff is not taking steps for summoning the witnesses or producing witnesses for recording the evidence. The issues were framed on 6.7.2009, thereafter several opportunities have been given to the plaintiff for evidence. Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Advocate has stated that he has written several letters to the plaintiff but plaintiff is not responding. He has also stated that he has even written a registered letter to this effect but to no effect. It appears the plaintiff is not interested in pursuing the matter. In any case the plaintiff has not taken steps for summoning the witnesses nor any witness of the plaintiff is otherwise present in the court for recording the evidence. In these circumstances, the suit of the plaintiff is dismissed for non- prosecution. January 5, 2011 ( Kuldip Singh ) (GR) Judge