THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY and THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI W.P.No.07 of 2010 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy) This writ petition is filed challenging the provisions of Section 13 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the SARFAESI Act’). This writ petition is misconceived, since the entire SARFAESI Act has been upheld by the Supreme Court in MARDIA CHEMICALS LTD v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[1]. In view of the same, all the grounds, which have now been raised, were deemed to have been raised and rejected by the Supreme Court. Enforcement of the provisions of Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act will not depend upon the set up of Central Registry. Further, we do not see any merit in the contention raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner that until the Central Registry is set up the SARFAESI Act is unworkable, since Section 39 contemplates that the provisions of sub-sections (2), (3) and (4) of Section 20 and Sections 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 27 shall apply after the Central Registry is set up and cause to be set up under sub-section (1) of Section 20. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. _____________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J. ____________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J. Dt.18.01.2010 va [1] 2004 (4) SCC 311