IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11475 of 2010 PRAMOD SHARMA, son of Binay Sharma, Resident of village Kandaul, P.S. Hulasganj, District Jehanabad …… Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR … Opposite Party ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Dhirendra Pratap Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Pd. Singh, A.P.P. 2 29.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 47(A) Excuse Act. It is alleged that about 400 liters of illegal countrymade liquor was recovered from the vehicle, which was driven by the petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is merely the driver of the vehicle which was being used as public transport vehicle. It is submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 15.2.2010 and is having clean antecedent. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, PRAMOD SHARMA, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of - 2 - the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Khizersarai P.S. Case No. 39 of 2010, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with the petitioner. If, after his release in this case, the petitioner is again found implicated in similar nature of cases, then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation then the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)