* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 8803/2008 % Date of Decision: 08.03.2011 DR. MOHD. ABDULLAHA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. U. Srivastava, Advocate versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT DELHI & ORS .... Respondent Through: Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna with Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Advocates for respondent-GNCTD. Mr. Naresh Kaushik with Ms. Aditi Gupta, Advocates for Respondent- UPSC. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? No ANIL KUMAR, J. The learned counsel for the respondents have relied upon Cabinet decision No.1403 dated 12.05.2008 approving the proposal to modify the proposed regulation for teachers of ISM/AYUSH stream of medicine. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that these documents which have been relied upon by the respondents along with affidavit dated 07.12.2010 were not before the Tribunal and were not considered by the Tribunal. Therefore, he seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to seek review of impugned order dated 12.09.2008 passed in O.A. No.1762/2008 titled Dr. Mohd. Abdullha v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, through Chief Secretary on the basis of pleas and documents which were not before the Tribunal in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. ANIL KUMAR, J. VEENA BIRBAL, J. MARCH 8, 2011 srb