IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18271 of 2011 MEENA KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 14.06.2011. After having heard Sri Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also having considered the submissions made by Sri Permeshwar Mehta, learned A.P.P. for the State, this court finds that this is one of the fittest cases which must be handled by the C.J.M., Nawadah. The allegations are general and vague only because there was some stone pelting upon the police force which were put on security duty that Sections 353 and 307 IPC have been inserted. The copies of two injury reports indicate as if there were simple and superficial injuries which could hardly bring the case within the purview of Section 307 IPC. It may be pointed out to the C.J.M., Nawada that the learned Sessions Judge has also noted down the injuries in his rejection order and that itself is sufficient to indicate that it could be doubtful whether the offence under Section 307 IPC was made out. Other offences except that under 2 Sections 307 and 353 are bailable. The court believes that the C.J.M., Nawadah appreciates the observations of this Court and admits the petitioner, a lady, to bail as and when she surrenders and prays for regular bail in connection with Nagar Nawada P.S.Case No.118 of 2011. With this observation, this petition stands disposed of. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)