1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL ً APPLICATION (APL) NO. 635 OF 2011. Lakhan Thakur & others ..Vrs.. State of Maharashtra ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders Orders. (Mr. R.M. Daga, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. K.L. Dharmadhikari, APP for the respondent.) ----- CORAM : A.H.JOSHI,J. DATE : DECEMBER 16,2011. 01) Heard. 02) Perused impugned order. Learned Judge has failed to record any finding as to the reasons and grounds of relaxation putforward by the applicants. 03) The reasons as to why the applicants’ prayer for relaxation deserves rejection, have not been discussed. 04) Thus the order turns out to be unreasoned. This Court is not searching for long reasons. What is being searched is the depth and not the volume of reasons. 05) In the result order under challenge is set aside. Exh-193 be heard and decided afresh. 06) Application is partly allowed in terms of Para No.5. JUDGE Deshmukh