IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION No. 4679 of 2006 Between: D. Gavarayya S/o. Ganapathi Rao H.No. 35010/1, Ist Floor, Kalavathi Nagar, Shapur, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Director General of Police Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent of Police, W.G. District at Eluru. 3 The Circle Inspector of Police, Palkol, W.G. District. 4 D. Raja Rao, S.I. of Police, Achanta P.S., W.G. District. 5 Ch. Viswanatha Reddy S/o. Krishna Reddy West Godavari District. 6 Charla Satyanarayana Reddy S/o. Not known to the Petitioner West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Habeas-Corpus directing the respondents 4 to 6 to produce the person namely Smt. CH. Ratnakumari D/o. Satyanarayana Reddy before this Hon'ble Court and let her free from the illegal detention and do justice. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.G.V.SHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : G.P. FOR HOME Counsel for Respondent Nos.5 and 6 : Sri Nageswara Rao Gollapati The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No.4679 of 2006 ORAL ORDER : (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R.Varma) This Writ of Habeas Corpus is filed by the petitioner directing respondent Nos.4 to 6 to produce the girl viz., Smt. Ch.Ratnakumari, daughter of Satyanarayana Reddy, before this Court and let her free from their illegal detention. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Ms. Kanthamma, Advocate, representing Sri G.V.Shivaji, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that there are no instructions from the petitioner and that nothing survives for adjudication in the writ petition, in view of the subsequent developments, like the petitioner and the girl living together and blessed with a child. 3. Recording the same, the writ petition is closed as infructuous, at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA _______________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU 17-06-2008 Msr. ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Director General of Police Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent of Police, W.G. District at Eluru. 3 The Circle Inspector of Police, Palkol, W.G. District. 4. Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Home, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (OUT). 5. Two C.D. copies. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No.4679 of 2006 17-06-2008 (Msr)