IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.326 of 2007 JHALAN MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 3.9.2008. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. This application has been filed against the order passed under section 311 of theCr.P.C. in order to bring the postmortem report on record for just decision of the case. The grievance of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the impugned order was passed at the stage of judgment. The case is of year 1992. It will further delay the disposal of the case. The petitioner is being harassed for last more than 16 years. Considered the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned order. It appears from the impugned order that it is a case under section 302 I.P.C. The postmortem report is essential for just decision of the case. Under the circumstances, the court below has rightly allowed the prosecution to bring the postmortem report on record under section 311 of the Cr.P.C. Accordingly, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order. Hence, this application is rejected. The prosecution is directed to take steps to bring the postmortem report on record within one month of receipt of this order and - 2 - N.H./ thereafter, the court below shall dispose of the case within next two months. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )