IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.27222 of 2008 Between: 1 Gorantla Venkatanarayana, S/o. Veeraiah, R/o. Nekkonda Village and Mandal, Warangal District. 2 Ravula Narasimha Reddy, s/o. Raghavareddy, R/o. Nekkonda Village and Mandal, Warangal District. 3 Edunuru Ravi, S/o. Uppalaiah, R/o. Nekkonda Village and Mandal, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Director of Civil Supplies, A.P.Civil Supplies Bhavan, Erramanzil, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector (Civil Supplies), Warangal, Warangal District. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mahabubabad Division, Warangal District. 4 The Tahsildar, Nekkonda Mandal, Warangal District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated 11-9-2008 in proceedings No. F2/440/2007-1 passed by the 2nd respondent and also the action of the 1st respondent in not passing any orders on the application filed by the petitioners along with an Appeal seeking to stay of all further proceedings No. F2/440/07-1 relating to appointment of Fair Price Shop Dealer in respect of newly created Fair Price Shop in Nekkonda Village and Mandal, Warangal District, as the same is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and in contrary to G.O.Ms.No.35 Consumer Affairs Food and Civil Supplies (CS-1) Department dated 17-9-2007 and consequently set aside the impugned order dt.11-9-2008 in Progs.F2.440/07-1 passed by the 2nd respondent. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.A.PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.27222 OF 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners addressed a letter dated 20.01.2009 to the Registry stating that he has instructions from the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 22nd January, 2009. IBL