CWP (T) No. 12519/2008 04.03.2011 Present: Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents It is not in dispute that the impugned office order dated 1.8.2005 (Annexure A-11) whereby penalty of ‘Compulsory Retirement’ imposed upon the petitioner was stayed in these proceedings. It is the contention of the petitioner that he is continuing to discharge his duties as a Workshop Helper/driver till date. According to him, he has been rendering his services to the satisfaction of the respondents. 2. Respondents have opposed the petition, inter alia on the ground that petitioner has failed to file statutory appeal. 3. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that liberty be granted to the petitioner to file an appeal within a period of two months from today. Liberty granted. Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents assures that the appeal shall be decided expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt thereof. Needless to add, respondents authority shall sympathetically take into account the fact that petitioner has continued to render his service as a Workshop Helper/driver till date. 4. With the aforesaid observations, petition stands disposed of. March 04, 2011 ( Sanjay Karol ), (rana) Judge.