IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 25TH MAY 2010 / 4TH JYAISHTA 1932 WP(C).No. 16019 of 2010(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.P.AZEEZ, S/O. AMINA, AGED 26 YEARS, PEON, D.I.U.P. SCHOOL, PARAL, THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -14. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. 4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THALASSERY SOUTH, KANNUR DISTRICT. 5. THE MANAGER, D.I.U.P. SCHOOL, PARAL, THALASSERY KANNUR DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.DILEEP MOHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 16019 of 2010 B ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 25th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner was appointed as Peon in the D.I.U.P. School, Paral as per Ext.P1. The said appointment was approved. Since the incumbent who went on LWA got extension of the leave from 12-12-2008 to 11-12-2013, the 5th respondent issued Ext.P11 order of appointment. The 4th respondent declined to approve the said appointment as per Ext.P3 order. Feeling aggrieved by the same, the matter was taken up before the 3rd respondent and then before the 2nd respondent and the appeal and revision filed before the said authorities were dismissed as per Exts.P4 and P5 respectively. Against the said orders, the petitioner has already approached the Government by filing Ext.P10 revision petition. The petitioner has taken various legal grounds in Ext.P10 besides contentions based on Ext.P9 order of appointment. These are matters for consideration by the 1st respondent in the revision petition. Since the revision petition is pending before the 1st respondent, this writ petition is disposed of, without making any observations with respect to the merits of the contentions raised WPC.16019/2010 : 2 : by the petitioner, with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P10, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, with notice to the petitioner as also the 5th respondent. Sd/- (C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge