C482 No. 919 of 2006 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Shri I.P. Kohli, Advocate, present for the petitioners. Shri B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder, present for respondents No. 1 and 2. Shri Pankaj Miglani, Advocate, present for respondent No. 3 (complainant). Respondent No. 3-Smt. Neeti Tamta, is also present in person in the court. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of this petition, moved under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioners have sought quashing of the criminal case No. 1710 of 2006, State Vs. Rajan Batra and others, relating to offences punishable under Sections 498A, 504, 323, 506 I.P.C. and one punishable under Section ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, and one punishable under Section 3 (I) (X) of SCST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nainital. Learned counsel for the parties, stated that parties to the matrimony have entered into compromise. An application No. 1375 of 2009, has been moved on behalf of the parties, which is supported by an affidavit with which a compromise has been filed in the court. Smt. Neeti Tamta (respondent No. 3), who is present in person, verified the fact that matrimonial dispute has been settled and she is living with her husband. In the above circumstances, in view of the principle of law, laid down in B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana 2003 (4) SCC Pg. 675, the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is allowed. The proceedings of criminal case No. 1710 of 2006, State Vs. Rajan Batra and others, relating to offences punishable under Sections 498A, 504, 323, 506 I.P.C. and one punishable under Section ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, and one punishable under Section 3 (I) (X) of SCST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nainital, are hereby quashed. Dt. 22.02.2010 (P. C. P., J.) S