IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42495 of 2010 REETA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 5. 28.04.2011. The present application has been filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail of opposite party no.2. It appears that on 23.07.2010 the opposite party no. 2 was granted anticipatory bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 13420 of 2010 on the undertaking that the opposite party no.2 is ready to keep the petitioner as wife with full dignity and honour. The cancellation of anticipatory bail of opposite party no.2 has been filed on the ground that the undertaking has been violated by opposite party no.2. Now learned counsel for opposite party no.2 submits that the marriage was performed by abducting the opposite party no. 2 and the petitioner is suffering from bone cancer, hence, the opposite party no. 2 is not able to comply the undertaking given before this court. All these contentions were not raised when the opposite party no. 2 was granted anticipatory bail on 2 23.07.2010. Now the opposite party no. 2 is not ready to take the petitioner to her matrimonial home, which a violation of undertaking given before this Court, hence, this court has no option but to cancel the anticipatory bail of opposite party no.2 in complaint case no. 1983 of 2009 pending before the court of the learned S.D.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur. The order dated 23.07.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 13420 of 2010 stands modified to the extent indicated above. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)