IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-29738 of 2008 Date of decision : 27.11.2008 Renu Verma and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Vikram Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Manjari Nehru, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for respondent. S. D. ANAND, J. Dismissed as withdrawn. Learned counsel for the petitioner has otherwise a grievance that in the light of the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge on the application given by the complainant (“to register the FIR against all the persons and to investigate the same and thereafter present the challan in Court.”), the police would feel duty bound to present the challan and prosecute the petitioners. The apprehension of the learned counsel for the petitioner is misconceived. The Investigating Agency has to act on the basis of whatever material comes to be collected during the course of investigation. It is made clear that Investigating Agency shall proceed in the matter unfazed by the observations made by the learned Sessions Judge (quoted in an earlier part of this order). November 27, 2008 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE