IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27542 of 2009 1. CHANAR MAHTO, son of Mangal Mahto 2. Rajkali Mahto, wife of Chanar Mahto 3. Umesh Kumar Mahto, son of Chanar Mahto 4. Lakhan Mahto, son of Naresh Mahto All are residents of vill.-Danapur, P.S.-Manjhagarh, Distt.-Gopalganj--------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioners. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Sobha Devi, wife of Ramesh Mahto, resident of Vill.-Danapur, P.S.- Manjhagarh, Distt.-Gopalganj---------------------------------------Opp. Parties. ----------- 2. 8.9.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that differences are in between the wife and husband. If the accused was intending to marry the husband with another girl then also, according to the learned counsel, petitioners are father-in-law, mother-in-law and a villager having no concern with the wife and husband for their matrimonial relation. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, in connection with Manjagarh P.S. case no.90 of 2009 , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )