IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. L.P.A. No. 453 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 1, 2009 Makhan Singh …Appellant Versus The Financial Commissioner Punjab, Chandigarh and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Ms. Amandeep Soni, Advocate, for the appellant. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. This appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against order dated 24.3.2009, passed by the learned Single Judge upholding the order passed by the Financial Commissioner, Punjab, whereby the prayer of the petitioner-appellant for entering mutation on the basis of the Will dated 22.12.1999, has been rejected. The basic reason for rejection of the prayer for entry of mutation is that there is a compromise dated 30.11.2000 whereby the parties have agreed to apportion the share between themselves. Moreover the parties are already before the Civil LPA No. 453 of 2009 (O&M) Court on the same very issue and the mutation shall be entered in accordance with the view taken by the Civil Court. There is, thus, no merit in the instant appeal. Dismissed. In view of the fact that the appeal has been dismissed on merits, therefore, no orders are required to be passed on the miscellaneous applications filed alongwith the appeal. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (JASWANT SINGH) July 1, 2009 JUDGE Pkapoor 2