S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3907/2010 (Super Shiv Shakti Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. vs. State) Order dt: 19/4/2010 1/2 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3907/2010 (Super Shiv Shakti Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. vs. State) DATE OF ORDER : 19/4/2010 HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.Anil Kaviraj, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel. By the impugned order dated 16/2/2010, the Notification dated 9/10/1985 published in the Gazette on 23/10/1975 delineating the boundaries of forest area in question was corrected by the District Collector Chittorgarh. The petitioner, whose factory manufacturing certain explosive products appears to have fallen into the area consequent to the said amendment of the boundaries of the forest area. The petitioner moved a representation to the Collector, Chittorgarh only vide Annex.7 dated 12/4/2010. The matter pertaining to suspension of his licence to carry on such business is already pending before the competent authority i.e.District Collector, Chittorgarh pursuant to remand by the Divisional Commissioner as stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner urged that the District Collector has no jurisdiction to amend such boundaries as has bee done by him vide order Annex.6 dated 16/2/2010. After hearing the learned counsel at some length, this Court is S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3907/2010 (Super Shiv Shakti Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. vs. State) Order dt: 19/4/2010 2/2 of the opinion that till any adverse order is passed against the petitioner, no cause of action can be said to have arisen to the petitioner merely on the basis of amendment of boundaries by the order of District Collector, Chittorgarh. If the licence of petitioner under the relevant law has been suspended or cancelled, the proceeding in that matter are admittedly pending before the competent authority. If and when an adverse order is passed against the petitioner, the petitioner can be said to have a cause of action for approaching this Court by way of writ petition after exhausting the alternative remedy prescribed under the relevant Statute. In the opinion of this Court, this petition as framed now is premature and same deserves to be dismissed. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed. Copy of this order be sent to the respondents. (DR.VINEET KOTHARI), J. item no. s/14 baweja/-