1 S.B. Civil writ petition No. 2412/2010 Satish Kumar vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order 12.3.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. SD Goswami petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner was appointed in the NREGA Scheme on contract basis and according to learned counsel for the petitioner the term of the petitioner is going to expire on 3rd April, 2010. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, by exercising power by virtue of condition no.6(i) of the contract, the petitioner's services have been terminated vide order dated 24.2.2010. It is submitted that petitioner was not guilty of any misconduct, which is clear from the inquiry report and further, petitioner has not been given any notice for holding any inquiry against the petitioner. The petitioner was appointed on contract basis and as per the petitioner himself his contract is going to expire on 3rd April, 2010. However, he has been removed by order dated 24.2.2010. It appears that before passing the impugned order Annex.6, detail inquiry was conducted and in a matter of contract, no vested right accrued to any person and renewal of the contact also cannot be claimed as a matter of right. In the facts and circumstances of the case 2 and particularly, looking to the scheme which provides annual contract and that too to the maximum period of 5 years, this court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition. In view of the above reasons, there is no merit in this writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. cpgoyal/-