IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.79201-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: FEBRUARY 15, 2007 Sant Lal ...PETITIONER VERSUS State of Haryana ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr.N.K.Sanghi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Partap Singh, Sr.DAG, Haryana. ... This is second petition for regular bail filed by the petitioner in case FIR No.466 dated 7.7.2005 registered under Sections 302/307/148/149 IPC and Sections 25/27/54/59 of the Arms Act at Police Station Sadar Hisar. I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR. As per the prosecution version, the petitioner had caused injury to deceased Rohtash with jelly. The bullet injuries, which proved to be fatal, were caused to co-accused, who is in custody. The earlier petition for bail was dismissed as not pressed on May 22, 2006. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is in custody since 23.11.2005 and he has not been attributed the fatal injuries. Counsel further contends that the trial is not progressing and till date out of thirty-three witnesses, only five witnesses have been examined. Counsel for the respondent-State contends that the prosecution will try its best to complete the prosecution evidence within a period of six months. Crl.Misc.No.79201-M of 2006 -2- In view of the aforesaid stand taken by the respondent-State, counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this petition at this stage with liberty to revive the said prayer after six months. Dismissed as not pressed at this stage with the aforesaid liberty. February 15, 2007 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE