1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4060 OF 2010 JAGANNATH GANGARAMJI ISHWARKAR ..VS... STATE OF MAH & ORS =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Shri J.M. Gandhi, advocate for petitioner Shri A.J. Mujumdar, A.G.P. for respondent no.1 C ORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & SMT. VASANTI A NAIK,J. DATED : September 07, 2010 . In this petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the Demand Notice as per the Provisional Assessment dated 5.2.2010 [Annexure:6], calling upon the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.85,125/- and wants restoration of electricity supply to the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner in this petition is that the petitioner is without electricity since February 2010. The petitioner had lodged his objection against the Provisional Assessment before the Assessing Officer- Deputy Executive Engineer, C.C.O. & M. Sub Division, M.S.E.D.C.L. Binaki, Nagpur, who is respondent no.3 before us. We are of the view that ends of justice would be served, if the petition is disposed of with a direction to 2 respondent no.3 to hear the petitioner and decide the petitioner's objection, as early as possible and in any case within one month from the date of receipt of this order. The respondent no.3 shall also give an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner before taking any final decision in the matter. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly in the aforesaid terms. Hamdast service is permitted. CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE SMP