^s^ ^c'>;^yy £:'\riy"" '.,.?'"<>*" A- l^ 'c^- / ^"6^-. 'T} f -S- . / ^S^J^ Atul Singh Thakur, S/o Shri Jitendra Kumar Singh Thakur, Aged about 19 years, R/o Tahisilpara, Kondagaon, District Bastar (C.G.) A / 2 Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical University, through its Registrar, Bhiali, District Durj; (C.G.) Bharti College ofEngineering and Technology, Durg (C.G.) All India Council for Technical Education, Indira Gandhi Sports Complex Indraprastha Estate, New Delhi. Bl i5»Rg® iB((IBfiffiUtBB8il®HililHiiaiRBg@il'S yf^ IC' (" ''; ^y'^::^\BRreRiSBinigilslI)a'l!iSl6lGa^ P^l!FIG>N6l^^-.:^%;^^.:;il^'i:?:--:ll:;::. '••'';yer8us;^:'';;.,;:'.:" :;''.'.'^ REgPQNDENTS Chhattisgarh A Swami Vivekariand; Teclinicai Uriiversity & Others .11;:AND;,.::.~'.;': •;^..<.' • ^:,'; :..:1.-:':': VVRIT'e@~ffil@N%3NG)^23'©F^lS PETlTIQiNER .:.,'::. W ^ : ,.:1::. ^ ',;Avin^sh:SShilpF.. .,:<:^''. :•: Versus RESFQNDENTS (^Kattis^tT^i^: ?Swahmi ; Viw Teet'inioalUniversity&^Ariother .' , ^ (Wi-itPetiti6nundeFArticle 236^27 ofthe Constitutionc?filiidia) -j SinglsBericliiMon'bleShriSatishK.Agnihotri, J. ; PtesSnt^;- MSfiRenu KochaF and S ^'Kpetitioners.—•::.'.,, • : • :: :;/1:1;' • . -: • • 1 : : : : . SftriY.S^THakur.AdvocatefoFtheresRondentUniversity. ::©R@EEfflIIi;%::'s';::.:..:.l:;:j. •-• ;:.-' :':::' ,;'^.'.:(Pas^'onthiSl:re ::day;^:fovgnibBr,'2CMO):;^' "'r!'!.''' 1. ' H^rel'leamed^unselfQrtheRarties.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ 2. Atthe yeEYOuf^,yearlied counsel appearing fprtte submit that so far ^^he qugstion of IEIW inTO petitions is GOncerned.tftafcnas^BeleniSettled by thjs Gpurt WiAnkit Agra^/y. Chftaffisga/tiSiv^^^n'e^nantf - & 6^ersf which has beeh.lfurtM^r soffi Bench ofthis Gourf irr (^fta(fisgaffiS^nw^M ftana^7ecftnira tAiA/ers/fy v.Antoi1 Agawa/&'0ffie;s^;ln^^t^ -petitipners made applieationsfe byt acGordirtg toi tMe learrded eounsel far the petitiongre, tl'ie same ^s ^n<3t ac^pted wjttrou^ makinganyObServation.Thus,.th®Fespondenl31.1th(3rities^m^ !. I;) 'i.;^. 1 W.P.(G)No.1829of2010(deeid^on2^ 2 W.A.Nd.356of2010(decidedon 18-10-201.0) S ii:a i;';'SI ^lffl 'SI Arun 4. be directed toconsider thecases of the present petitioners in view pfthe decision ofthis Court rendered in Ankit Agrawal. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent University does not controvert the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Accordingly, both the writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent University to consider and decide the cases of the respective petitioners in accordance with ordinance No.14 within a period of seven days from the date of making of appropriate applications by the petitioners, if so advised. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge