IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37349 of 2010 1. SAROJ KUMAR 2. DEODHARI RAI 3. JAGDHARI RAI 4. SHIVHDARI RAI @ MANDHARI RAI 5. LAL BABU RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 01.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioner nos. 2 to 5 are alleged for receiving Rs.75,000/-, watch, utensils, chain of gold for marriage of petitioner no. 1, but not coming for marriage of petitioner no. 1. Settlement of the marriage or receiving of any amount in connection to marriage is denied showing that father of petitioner no. 1 had died on 02.2.2009. Marriage is said to be solemnized in the month of May is not believable for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, West, Muzaffarpur in connection with Complaint Case No. 732 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)