IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2208 OF 2007 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2208 OF 2007 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2208 OF 2007 Jayesh Dhirajlal Bhanushali (Kataria).... Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra ...... Respondent. Mr. M.S.Kamtekar for the petitioner Mr. S.R.Shinde APP for State. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 3RD MARCH, 2008 DATED; 3RD MARCH, 2008 DATED; 3RD MARCH, 2008 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. An interlocutary order passed by Metropolitan Magistrate dated 3-11-2007 permitting the complainant/wife to withdraw the sum of Rs.1,50,000/- which was deposited by the accused/husband is challenged by filing this petition. Perusal of the order passed by the Learned Single Judge of this court, pursuant to which the amount was deposited, indicate that the said amount represent the value of the Sridhan property. The accused is being prosecuted for comission of an offence punishable under section 498-A, 406 and 420 read with 34 of IPC. Instead of letting the amount lying in the court, the trial court had permitted it to be withdrawn by the wife and the order also goes to secure the re-deposit of the amout in as much as the complainant has been directed to execute indemnity bond and to furnish an undertaking to re-deposit the amount within two months as and when directed by the court. As the return of the amount is secured, no interference with the interlocutory order is called for. Hence petition is summarily dismissed. ....