-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 970 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 877 OF 2008 Suresh Shripal Chougule ...Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr. Kulkarni, instructed by Mr. Umesh R. Mankapure, for the applicant. Mr. P.S. Hingorani, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the Respondent. CORAM: BILAL NAZKI & ANOOP V. MOHTA , JJ. DATE: JANUARY 22, 2009 P.C. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Perused the judgment and the record. We do not find that there is case for bail as, according to the judgement, there was an eye witness to the occurrence. We do not want to comment about testimony of any of the witnesses including the eye witness which may prejudice either of the parties during the hearing of the appeal. Application for bail is accordingly rejected. BILAL NAZKI, J. ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.