IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2009 / 6TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 9901 of 2009(G) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P. SAIDALAVI, PATTUPARA HOUSE, OTTATHARA.P.O, KODUR, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. 2. M. MADHAVAN NAIR, JAYASREE, CACLICUT ROAD, MANJERI. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.9901 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 27th day of March, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that by Ext.P2 order of the Tribunal, the timings settled in favour of the 2nd respondent was set aside and its reconsideration has been ordered. According to the petitioner in the meanwhile he has filed Ext.P1 objection before the Ist respondent against the settlement of timings sought for by the 2nd respondent. The prayer made in this writ petition is that when the matter is reconsidered as directed in Ext.P2 order of the Tribunal, Ext.P1 objection filed by him should also be considered. 2. Having regard to the above facts, I see no reason to decline the prayer sought for. Accordingly, the writ Petition is disposed of directing that while settling the timings in pursuance to Ext.P2, Ext.P1 objection filed by the petitioner shall also be duly adverted to. vi (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE