p~ ^Txf'^tj^j^j^ siTft^<Ko, 1^i<rf1^|(|T *«(»<CT(^NI^ ^200 ^TT^T ^T'f^h? ^S?T W^iCTRF ^ W^F'?^^ ( I^W^^a^T ^prf^N "w^ff •$f^i^-^^7 i?3tJm^^T F, Appellant (Origmal Applicantl Res^ondent (Original Hon- Appiieantl Ponna^ Nine) Residefit WRSC Smt, P< Six) yea Daught- R/o OF Comple: Upstair D.B. Hon?ble Shri Dhirendfa Mishra, & Hoa?ble Shri Dilip Ra4sahefo Deshmiikh, JJ 13.01.2009 None for the appeltaat| for Uie appeUant, i.No. 174 of2005 |aiiti Srinivasa Rao, aged abbut 29 (Twenty sars, S/o Shri Satyan^ by caste Nai Brahmin, of Type-II, Quarter No.90/4 (Ninety/Four), |olony, Raipur (CG) Versu^ |nnaganti Anuradha, aged about 26 (Twenty 's, Wife of Shri P. Shrinivasa Rao, ^rof Ip. Electrical Fuse Call Office, Near Swetha s, Door No.13/0'8/04 (Thirteen/Eight/Four), >, Bobbili, Dist. Vijaynagaram, Aepeal yader Sect|on^l^{ll ofthe Pamily Court Act, 1984. Even^ui fhe second caU, noue appeai's None for the respondeiit, Accorduigly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution, Inview ofabove, M,C,I?.No. 1238/05 stauds disposed of Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge