a^r-c';' ^ :-"'::,,rr i?*i ^ •••s',?!s^i- 1 c^,^}^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) N0. '?i/&'? /2010 PETITIONER ^^M^ RESPONDENTS Smt. Pramila Dongre (Befoire marriage Pramila Sakheria) W/o Shri Shiv Kumar Dongre, aged about 50 years, Assistant Teacher Primary School, Charoda, Block-Patan, Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Patan, Distt. Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. g 1 ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan ShrivastawLJ. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITICTI (S) N0.3485/2010 Smt. Pramila Dongre Versus State ofChhattisgarh and Othere WRIT PEmiON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSrTUTION OF INCNA Present: - Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the pettttoner. Shri Bhaskar Payashi, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 15thJuly, 2010) TTie petitioner was initially appointed as Deputy Teacher on 07-12-1981 on a foced pay of Rs.200/-. After completion of her probatron period, she was granted regutar pay scale. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitted to regular pay scale with efFect from the date of initial appointment or after completion of probatfon period. 3. The issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A.No.2745/^ (Madhuhant Yadu and 56 Others v. State ofM.P. & ottiers). wherein it was hekl that the similarly situated teachere are entitted to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court uphokling the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assfetant Teachers are entrtled to reguter pay scate from the date of initial appointment. ^^^. ^. ••.,- .,il • ^-^1:^ '•OBsffSSS'' _^ 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submits that this Court, while considering the same issue in Ram Kumar Sahu & others v. State Govt. of ChhaWsgarh & Another. W.P.(S).No.813 of 2007, by orcter dated 12/02/2007, has granted regular pay scale with effect from the date of inrtiat appointment. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that the case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Ram Kumar Sahu (supra). 6. In view of that, this petition is altowed on the same terms, subject to verification ofthe facts. No order as to costs. ^aff-^^ Tumane