(7 J&% 39a®/// ® ". IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Singlg Bench w. P. ( s ) No. {Egg /2oo9 /‘ PETITIONER : 1. Mohan Singh, S/o Budhiman Singh, Caste Gond, aged about 24 years, R/o Village Parsa, Post Dandgoan, Udaipur, Surguja (C.G.) Surendra Kumar Singh, S/o Aitbal Ram, Caste Gond, aged about 22 years, R/o Udaipur, Surguja (C.G.). Madan Singh, S/o Gurudayal Singh, Caste Kunwar, aged about 23 years, R/o Village Phulchuhi, Post Dandgoan Udaipur, Surguja (C.G.). Smt, Basanti Bai, W/o Phudala Ram, Caste Uraon, aged about 24 years, R/o Udaipur, Surguja (C.G.). 5. Kumari Phalora Ekka, D/o Blasiyus Ekka, Caste Uraon, aged about 22 years, R/o Village Kumdewa, Post Sayar, Udaipur, Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS Lo RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 2. Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur (C.G.) ( J 3. The Collector Surguj a, Ambikapur Distt. Surguja (C.G.). 47’ The Additional Collector, Distt. Surguja (C.G.). 5. Xehief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, District Surguja (C.G.) v/ 6. Project Administrator Tribal Welfare Department Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) (z 7. Block Education Officer, Block— Udaipur, District Surguja (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA m Wmw“p‘c53'b>rm/ W 200? mm (Wu) WWW WW WW $Wm iE PRI’E‘ENKER $EX¥AaKER $3 HGEE‘ELE §HR§ JU$’E‘E€ 17.8?0’2C'K39 Shn’ 811ak‘ri Raj Shaka, Shm' Animd Dub€y, PJ Comsrm'on of ceungs pe‘cltimlei‘ wars appointed E (milexura Pf 2} aiong with ale. p€tifim3 €rs others ha‘m b C 1mse1 for the Stats éppoiniaa‘ 0:1 contingent bas whai‘soevm‘ for the saidV post A? This stagé. coun withdraw T116 prsssnt petitic 1aefora mgpomlant No.3 alld to dscids the repmSEIlte accorciailc€ with law; Th6 pé‘titimmm am g §€tition with libériy 21$ aii €V€ntuaEty of flijng any su'c thg sanm would be decicieci 5 k is made ciétar that opinion on marks of the c: Ei‘oerty to dociéo the a§paal c x counsol for the poti ioner . 1, foi: iho Staio 2L 1 petitionars w&}rs to as} for tho n wi ‘1 liberty to fie representatiou gubmits that dixection may be given §ioz1 so made exgmditiouSly 1; it is {Eirecteé that in the 1 reyresentation by *ihe peti ionere, tréctiy 1:1 accorcia; ce x VLt'h law. this Court hass 110$ expreesed am,’ 11.:- vv srmit‘ioci rasaid. {so and the nits“ authorit‘i WOUEd Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge ¢ + withdraw tho prosaih a; 36:11 retamod. for tho potitionero io than. the .S peon Vide ordor éa‘md 19.2.2G08 39 o‘éhor caudidams bui except for submi-‘Le that the peiitioners 'ETez‘e ie ago therefore ‘éhey have no right o