IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH MARCH 2011 / 25TH PHALGUNA 1932 OP(C).No. 1059 of 2011(O) -------------------------------------- (O.S.NO.812/2005 AND 998/2005 OF SUB COURT, THRISSUR) ----------------------- PETITIONERS ---------------------- 1. KURIAKOSE, S/O.(LATE) LAZAR, ARANGASSERI HOUSE, KOTTAPPADY, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR. 2. WILSON, S/O.(LATE) LAZAR, ARANGASSERI HOUSE, KOTTAPPADY, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR. 3. ROSSA, W/O.(LATE) LAZAR, ARANGASSERI HOUSE, KOTTAPPADY, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR. BY ADVS. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA SMT.RASHMI RAVINDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. VARGHESE, S/O.(LATE)LAZAR, ARANGASSERI HOUSE, KOTTAPPADY, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, TRISSUR.PIN-680 506 2. BABY, W/O.M.C.JOSE, MUNDUMPAL, AKATHIYUR P.O., THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR-PIN- 680 503. BY THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts P. BHAVADASAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O.P.(Civil). No. 1059 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of March, 2011. JUDGMENT The limited prayer in this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for a direction to the Sub Court, Thrissur to take up O.S.812 of 2005 and O.S.998 of 2005, of which joint trial has been ordered, as expeditiously as possible and dispose of it on merits in accordance with law. 2. The petitioners are defendants in O.S. 812 of 2005, which is a suit for injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and committing waste therein. The defendants have entered appearance and filed their written statement. There is another suit filed as O.S.998 of 2005, which is ultimately connected with O.S.812 of 2005. The petitioners had moved a petition for joint trial of the two suits, and that was allowed. The complaint of the petitioners is that the O.P.(C). 1059/2011. 2 suits are not being listed for trial and disposed of inspite of several attempts made by them. 3. In the nature of the order that is proposed to be passed, it is felt that notice to the respondents is not necessary. 4. All that the petitioners have sought for is a direction to have the two suits disposed of at the earliest. It is to be noticed that the suits are of the year 2005 and this court is given to understand that they are ripe for trial. There is no reason as to why the court below should not dispose of the suits as requested by the petitioners. Therefore, there will be a direction to the Sub Court, Thrissur to list O.S.Nos.812 of 2005 and O.S. 998 of 2005 and dispose of the same in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sb.