CR 5796/1998 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. A. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. R. Chokraborty, learned State counsel. The petitioner, as stated in the writ petition is in the occupation of t he particular plot of land. It has been stated in the writ petition that on 17.1 1.98 a team of police personnel led by the Officer-in-Charge of Jalukbari P.S. a nd the Executive Magistrate from Civil Eviction Department visited her place of residence alongwith central paramilitary force and demolished her residential ho use and also evicted her. It is the case of the petitioner that before doing suc h an act, no notice was served on her. Although the matter is pending for the last about 12 years, no counter a ffidavit has been filed by the respondents. No interim order is also operating i n the case. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of providing that i f the petitioner is still aggrieved, she may approach the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 by filing appropriate representation. In the event of making such representat ion, the said two authorities may examine the grievance of the petitioner and sh all pass appropriate order. With the above directions, writ petition is disposed of.