1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 1662/1989 (Kamalsing Narsing Patil Versus State of Maharashtra thr. Secy & 3 others) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. Shri S.P. Palshikar, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM :D.D. SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 19, 2007. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that cause of action in the instant writ petition does not survive. In the facts and circumstances, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE APTE