1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1540/2010 ( Harshwardhan s/o Liladhar Nikose .vs. State of Mah. through PS Khaparkheda, Nagpur and ors. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr. P.K. Sathianathan, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. J.B. Jaiswal, APP for respondent no.2. Mr. R.K. Tiwari, advocate for Respondents 2 and 3. .......... CORAM : P.D. KODE, J. DATED : MARCH 17, 2011 Heard. The learned counsel for the applicant/victim has urged that though applicant by the application preferred has initially prayed for cancellation of the bail granted to respondents no.2 and 3 for the offence of murder, now applicant is pressing the application only for imposing the condition of respondents no.2 and 3 not entering the jurisdiction of Khaparkheda Police Station till the conclusion of the trial to remove the apprehension that the witnesses due to presence of the respondents no.2 and 3 in the village not fearlessly deposing truth at the trial. The learned counsel for respondents no.2 and 3 has stated that they have no intention of whatsoever nature to tamper the 2 prosecution evidence or threaten or to intimidate any of the witnesses cited against them. However, in order to show such bona fides on part of respondents no.2 and 3, he is making statement at bar that respondents no.2 and 3 will reside out of Khaparkheda village until the trial is over, excepting the dates on which they are required to attend the Police Station. The statement made is hereby accepted. The learned APP says since justice is not only required to be done but must appear to have been done and making of such statement will serve the purpose for which application is pressed. In premises aforesaid, statement made is accepted and application is marked disposed of in terms of same. JUDGE halwai