IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Civil Revision 219 of 2001 (Old No. 399 of 1985) State of U.P. and another ……Petitioners Versus Sri Pritam Singh ….…Respondent Sri Standing Counsel of Uttaranchal for the petitioner Sri L.P. Naithani, Advocate for the Respondent. Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard the l earned counsel for the parties. By this revision application for appointment of the arbitrator has been allowed. The respondent has been directed to appoint the arbitrator. I see no reason to interfere with the order as admittedly the arbitrator was appointed in pursuance of the agreement clause. Revision is dismissed. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) Dated:26.08.2004 Ashok