IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2352 of 2006 SM.SANDHYA DEVI @ GURIYA KUMARI, WIFE OF SHRI RAKESH KUMAR, R/O MOHALLA-GULABBAGH, BETTIAH POWER HOUSE (NEAR) DISTRICT-WEST CHAMPARAN AT PRESENT AT MOHALLA-KAPTANGANJ, C/O GITA SHRI VASHTRALAYA NEAR POLICE CHAUKI KAPTANGANJ, P.S. & P.O. KAPTANGANJ, DISTT. KUSHI NAGAR (U.P.) -O.P./ PETITIONER Versus RAKESH KUMAR, SON OF SHRI RAGHUNATH PRASAD OF MOHALLA-GULABGABJ, NEAR POWER HOUSE BETTIAH DISTT.EAST CHAMPARAN. -APPELLANT/OPP.PARTY _______ For the Petitioner : Mr. Nirmal Kr.Sinha-3 For the Opp.Party : M/s Ashok Kr. Sinha & Shyam Sunder Pandey 10 01.02.2010 After some argument learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that in view of the provisions as contained in Section 19(5) of the Family Court Act, 1984 this Civil Revision may not be maintainable specially in view of the decision of Division Bench of this Court in Jagdish Pd. Chouhan V. Bhuneshwar Chouhan & Anr., 2009 (4) BBCJ 442. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Civil Revision to avail any other 2 AAhmad/ remedy which may be available to the petitioner under law. Learned counsel for the opposite party raises no objection. In that view of the matter, this Civil Revision is dismissed as withdrawn. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)