BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirteenth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12102 of 2011 KARUPPU @ KARUPPAIAH @ MARKET KARUPPAIAH, ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED 2 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE K-PUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.1220/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.SUNDARAJAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.2 was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 15.08.2011 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 448, 307 and 506(ii) IPC, in Crime No.1220 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner arrayed as A2 and a case has been registered under Sections 147, 148, 341, 448, 307 and 506(ii) IPC. On 13.08.2011, the wordy quarrel arose between the petitioner and the de-facto complainant the petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 15.08.2011 and the injured has been discharged from the hospital. He would further submit that already A1 was arrested and enlarged on bail and A3 and A4 were arrested and released on bail and A5 was enlarged on anticipatory bail and hence, he prays for enlargement on bail. 3. Refuting the same, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the occurrence took place on 13.08.2011 and he fairly conceded that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital; already A1 was enlarged on bail and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also the material available on record, the alleged occurrence took place on 13.08.2011 and the case has been registered on the same day, the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner who is arrayed as A2 arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 15.08.2011, except the petitioner others were enlarged on bail, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain condition. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. sd/- 13/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, MADURAI. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE K-PUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. 5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. S.SUNDARAJAN Advocate SR.No.31160 SR : 13.09.2011 : 2p/7c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12102 of 2011 Date :13/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/