IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 19TH JULY 2010 / 28TH ASHADHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 653 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.19398/2009, DATED 7.4.2010 .................... PETITIONER: --------------- SMT.JANAKI MENON, AYODYA FLATS, JANASAKTHI ROAD, PURANATTUKARA, P.O.THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.T.RESMI DAMODARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. AVINASH BIXIT (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAM, 18, INSTITUTIONAL AREA, SHABEED JEET SINGH MARG, NEW DELHI. 2. D.T.S. RAO (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAM, BANGLORE REGION. 3. S.VIJAYAKUMAR, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAM, CHENNAI REGION. BY STANDING COUNSEL SHRI V.V.ASOKAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- Contempt Case(C)No.653 of 2010 --------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 19th DAY OF JULY, 2010 JUDGMENT The Contempt of Court Case is filed alleging violation of the interim order passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.19398/09 dated 7.4.2010. Therein this Court directed the competent among the respondent to take a decision on Exhibit P12 within a period of one month. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that as per order dated 28.6.2010 in I.A.No.8277/10 this Court has granted further time to the respondent to comply with the directions in the order dated 7.4.2010. It is submitted that three months' time was sought for, which was granted. The learned counsel for the petitioner, referring to the reply affidavit submits that a direction may be issued to pass orders as requested for. 3. Evidently further time has been granted to pass orders. CO(C)No.653/10 -2- In that view of the matter, leaving open the remedy of the petitioner to move again, if required, this Contempt of Court Case is closed. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. dsn