3=5^- ^witft'ii, yiSw'w, R^iyy ^V,^o ^-•A3o- ^1/^00^- 3ii^?r ^ag> ('yll^'i8') ?BI l^-fl'n sn^r ^^^ ??gTW^Tfef3n^T <*i-4lc(4N ^i*i<*il ^fe^ <f<si^K ^ Petttioner f^espondents 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. ^nnepu Prashant, S/o Shrt A. Narayana Rao, (gsd about 18 years, R/o R!y. Constructton ^olony, Rty. Qrt. No.740/1, Near Ganesh Wandir, Bilaspur. -Versus- ^tate of ChhatUsgarh, Through the pecretary, Department of Health and Family teNare,D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. fhe Director, Medical EducaUon, Raipur. (phhattisgarh InsUtute of Medicat Sciences, Through its Dean, ChhatSisgarh Instftute of iljtedicai Sciences, Bilaspur. iuru Ghasidas Unwetsity, Through its [iegistrar, Guru Ghasidas Unwereify, ^ilaspur. 1:u. Sujata Singh, D/o Dr. (Major) T.A. Singh, s|ged about 19 years, R/o Qrt. OB-1, CSEB (?olony, Tifta, Biiaspur. ^nubhav Chandrater, 2nd year, M.B.B.S. }tudent, CIMS, Biiaspur. Division Bench: Hon'ble Shri L.C. Bhadoo & Hon'bte Shri Dhirendra Mishri JJ 21.8-2007 (InChamber) Heard Shri Utkarsh Verm^, counsel for fte peUtfoner & Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the StaW L^ XI-HC—78 3n^(^il<;iw w aii^i *w'* 3=CTT^pn^T, (jiTfly'ld, (sXriiyy vi&LO f^L.NJo- Gt^o^- 'w^ an^r iRra (1rt?^f: sSiIWirtttTSII^ <*l'i|fa'lil-< *<Wcff'tf.fe^> <Fal^.l< i? siiwT iBi^i sC The petiUoner has preferre^ 14-6-2007 passed by this Bench] State ofChhatUsgarh & Others)( of the parties and particularhf At matter namely, Ku. Sujata Singh year MBBS course as unreserv^d However, her admission was cailc passed in W.P.N0.4788/20W Others). During the course of argun|ients that the admission of Ku. Sujat^ consent of leamed coynsel parties| In the first instance, we do 14-6-M07 passed in the case of petitioner hereio was not a party seekingreviawofthatorder. Accot Consequentfy, I.A.No.1, ap(l review petition & I.A.No^ apptic^Uon petition stand disposed <rf. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge this review petMon for revtew <rf order dated |in W.P.No.54220006 rt<u. Sujata Slngh vs. The sald order was passed wtth the consent the background that the petitioner in that was in the flret instance admitted in the first Sainik class candidate in ftie year 2006. cailcelled on account of order dated 20.^-2006 (Pa^itosh Sonkar vs. Stete of Chhattisgarh & lents, leamed counsel for the parfies agreed Singh was cancell«l; ttierefore, with the the order under revlew was passed. lot find any ground fer review of order dated Ku. Sujata Singh (supra). Moreovsr, the |n that case, therefore, ha is not enUttod for I'dlngly, the rwnew peUUon is dlsmissed. ^lication for condonation ^ ctolay in filing the for seeklng. pemassion to fite review Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge