1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.08.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR W.P.(MD).Nos.9558 and 9559 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 1 of 2011 P.Rajkumar : Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.9558/2011 P.Naina Mohamed : Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.9559/2011 Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu represented the Managing Director, TASMAC Ltd., CMDA Office Complex, IV Floor, Tower II, Egmore, Chennai-8. 2.The Senior Regional Manager, TASMAC Ltd., Plot No.100, Anna Nagar, Madurai-625 020. 3.The District Manager, TASMAC Ltd., Ramanathapuram. : Respondents in both W.Ps. COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to issue tender schedules in the TASMAC Wine Shop Bars and snacks selling in Shop Nos.6852 and 7046 at R.S.Mangalam, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District to the petitioners respectively. For Petitioners : Mr.P.Muthusamy For Respondents : Mr.M.Muniasamy Standing Counsel COMMON ORDER The petitioners have sought for a Mandamus, directing the third respondent to issue tender schedule applications in respect of the TASMAC Wine Shop Bars and snacks selling in Shop Nos.6852 and 7046 at R.S.Mangalam, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District to the petitioners respectively. 2. It is the case of the petitioners that pursuant to the notification dated 09.08.2011, they submitted applications for issuance of tender schedule forms along with the prescribed fee of Rs.525/- by way of demand drafts drawn in the name of the District Manager, TASMAC Limited, Ramanathapuram, the third respondent herein. The request of the petitioners has not been considered so far and, hence, they sent representations dated 19.08.2011 to the third respondent to issue tender forms. Contending inter https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 alia that there is a failure to discharge the duties, as per the Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Rules, 2000, the petitioners have come forward with the present Writ Petitions for the reliefs stated supra. 3. Considering the limited relief, Mr.M.Muniasamy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the TASMAC was put on notice. He denied the allegations levelled against the District Manager, TASMAC Limited, Ramanathapuram, the third respondent herein. However, he submitted that the tender schedule application would be issued, on receipt of necessary application with the prescribed fee. The submission of the learned Standing Counsel is placed on record. 4. In view of the above, a direction is issued to the District Manager, TASMAC Limited, Ramanathapuram, the third respondent herein to issue the tender schedule applications to the petitioners for the TASMAC Wine Shop Bars and snacks selling in Shop Nos.6852 and 7046 at R.S.Mangalam, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District, respectively. Mr.M.Muniasamy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the TASMAC also submitted that he will communicate a copy of the order passed by this Court to the third respondent, so as to enable the third respondent to comply with the directions issued by this Court. 5. The Writ Petitions stand ordered accordingly. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs SD/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.side) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(C.S) To 1.The Managing Director, TASMAC Ltd., CMDA Office Complex, IV Floor, Tower II, Egmore, Chennai-8. 2.The Senior Regional Manager, TASMAC Ltd., Plot No.100, Anna Nagar, Madurai-625 020. 3.The District Manager, TASMAC Ltd., Ramanathapuram. +2 CC to Mr.P.Muthusamy, Advocate, SR.Nos.28878 and 28879 SML Common order made in W.P.(MD).Nos.9558 and 9559 of 2011 Dated:- 24.08.2011 TR : 24.08.2011: 2p/6c : IT https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/