IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 745 OF 2009 IDA ALMEIDA (EXPIRED) THROUGH LR'S AND 3 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus ELCINA PAES AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Shri J. A. Lobo, Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri S. D. Padiyar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 25th March, 2010 P.C.:- Heard the learned Counsel on behalf of both parties. The Petitioners are the Plaintiffs in RCS No.764/2000/F. The Order dated 2-4-2002 is in their favour and the said Order still subsists. By virtue of the said Order, the Defendants have been restrained from interfering with the Plaintiffs possession with the suit property i.e. survey no.123/27. Shri J. A. Lobo, learned Counsel on behalf of the Petitioners/Plaintiffs has invited my attention to the existing wall on the southern boundary of the said property which is seen at photograph G10, at page 363. Learned Counsel has also drawn my attention to other photographs at page 365. The wall in photograph G10 can be seen with lose stones without any stones being thrown down. From the photographs G11 and G12, it can be seen that certain stones from the wall of the Petitioners in respect of survey no.123/27 have been removed and thrown down. Shri S. D. Padiyar, learned Counsel has drawn my attention to the applications filed by the Petitioner by which certain complaints were made by the Petitioners to the Police. Since the Petitioners have an injunction in their favour and there was already a wall of lose stones on the southern boundary of the Petitioners property, in my view, the learned trial Court ought to have granted police protection to the Plaintiffs to put the said stones back on the said wall as seen in photograph G12, irrespective of whether the Defendants had removed them or not, as the Plaintiffs had apprehended obstruction from the Defendants. Learned Counsel on behalf of the Plaintiffs states that earlier such protection was given. In the light of what has been stated herein above, the petition is allowed and the learned trial Court is directed to grant police protection to the Plaintiffs, at their cost in order to enable the Petitioner/Plaintiffs to put back the stones to the said wall of lose stones which is on the southern boundary of survey no.123/27 as can be seen on photograph G10 at page 363. Petition disposed of on the above terms. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.