m mg magi ”mm GE CH; MEQVAR M Bumwxg wasgg m.§o>£ GE? 29% FWEE’HQN‘ER Mohd luau 7“ Rahml Khan, Agd about 43 yetms, S/ l 0 bhri W AR. ’l TKhan Service-Deputv SuperintEndent of D L Once, 1: Amti Coniuption Buriiau, R/o Quartez“ NOE—28, 01d Meena ‘ ' Bazar Colonv; Civil ' Lin6S. Bilaspur, DiStt. 1% 351311? {CG} Bhawan, Mantralax , Rapur, Digit. Raipu‘r (CG) 01 CmmLtLsga; n 11 bccmtdy, Départme‘nt of {Police} DKS Bhawan “¢‘\ d, R’HPLL ULELL Kdlpul Dirgcmr Generai 0f Police, Héadquartsrs, Raipur, Distt. Raipu: (CG) Inspector Ganrsral of Police, Evonomic Offance Winn/Anti (301 r 113mm Bureau Raupur Dlstt Rarnu (Cu) . SLlpeFmtelldalt of Polic€ Ant: Con uptmn B meau Papu Distt. Ralpur (CG) 6. Superintendent of Police, Anti Cam‘uption Bureau, Beejapur, Distt. Beejapur (CG) CD 1;. ?uTgTEwf€ UWEBLR ERTECLE 220 (3F THE wONSTiTUMEON GF INDEA v , VE§$U§ “E‘cEFQNEENTa 1. State Gf Cum 1,1 t“? Through S691 Genaai A 1. Muninis‘aratimi D Lmam, uKS HEGH COURT GF CHHATTISGH AT BELASPUR (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) Writ PetEtiQn (S) N0. {M56 of 2Q38 Mohd. Man U£ Rahim Khan PEIE‘HGNER VERSUS State 0f Chhawsgarh and others. Smt. F. Mirza counsei for the peiitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur PL for the respondents/State. WRIT PETiTiON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (06.07.2009) With ’he consent of the counsei for the parties, the matter is heard finally. ChaHenge in the instant petition is to the order dated 69.2008 (Annexure P—5) passed by the State Governme whereby the petitioner was transferred from Anti Corruption Brueau, Bitaspur to Bijapur as Dy.S.P., in vioiation of he transfer policy. This Court entertaining the grievance of the petitioner had granted stay in his favour vide order daed 11.9.2OG8, in view of the fact that the petition was fiied on 9.9.2008 and . the stay was aiso granted in favour of the petitioner, the transfer order so far as it reiates to the petitioner is hereby quashed. However, the State Government wouid be- at iiberty to pass an order if the administrative exigency so warrants. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed H r44 of. Sd/- ' Pritinker DiWaker Judge RES?ONBEN?S t nt t t