IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20126 of 2010 1. Guru Prasad S/O Shayam Narayan Singh R/O Vill. + P.O.- Nisan Nagar Baddi, P.S.- Baddi (Sheosagar), Distt.- Rohtas Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna 3. Inspector General Of Police (Administration), Bihar, Patna 4. Deputy Inspector General Of Police Sahabad Range, Dehri On Sone, Rohtas 5. Chairman, Constable Selection Board, Sahabad Range, Board No.2, Bihar, Patna 6. Superintendent Of Police, Rohtas At Dehri On Sone, Rohtas 7. Sergent Major, Police Line, Buxar ---------------------------------- 2. 22.11.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner claims to have secured 13 marks in the selection process for Constable under Advertisement Nos. 1 of 2004 and 2 of 2004. Learned Counsel for the parties are not at issue that in LPA No. 831 of 2009 directions have been given for re-ascertainment of vacancies under the aforesaid advertisements. Counsel for the parties are therefore agreed that the writ application may be disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to pursue his remedies before the respondents in the event that vacancies increase after reascertainment and persons having obtained 13 marks, as claimed by the petitioner, may or may not become eligible for consideration subject to the same and fulfillment of other stipulated conditions. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)