--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whether reporters of the Local papers are allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA. CWP No.8413 of 2010. Decided on: December 24, 2010. Jai Gopal. …… Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and another. …….Respondents. Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B.Misra, J. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, J. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K.Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. Advocate General. R.B.Misra, J (oral): C.M.P.No.12559 of 2010. Allowed. CWP No.8413 of 2010. 1. Heard Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, learned Additional Advocate General for the respondents. - 2 - 2. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- (i) “That this writ petition may kindly be allowed and writ in the nature of mandamus may be issued to the respondents that the service of the petitioner rendered as an Ad-hoc for 10 years be counted for the purpose of increments and fixation of his seniority; and (ii) That the respondents may be directed to count the Adh-hoc period of service rendered by the petitioners for fixation of pay by allowing him all the increments from the date of his initial appointments as per the law settled by this Hon’ble Court in CWP(T) No.7712 of 2008.” 3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the present writ petition is squarely covered by the decision made by this Court in L.P.A. No.36 of 2010 decided on 15th July, 2010. 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is being disposed of with the directions to respondent No.1 to consider the representation of the petitioner alongwith certified copy of this order and supporting - 3 - documents. The representation shall be disposed of by a speaking order in view of the observation made in the judgment passed in LPA No.36 of 2010 titled Sita Ram vs. State of HP and others, decided on 15th July, 2010. 5. In view of the above terms the writ petition is disposed of. C.M.P.No.12558 of 2010. No order in view of the disposal of main writ petition. Disposed of. Copy dasti on usual terms. (R.B.Misra) Judge (Surinder Singh ) Judge December 24, 2010. (Pds)