IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42388 of 2009 ANIL YADAV @ DIPU @ RABINDRA YADAV, SON OF GOSAI YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DAPARKHA, P.S. TRIVENIGANJ, DISTRICT SUPAUL VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ------- 3. 14.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under sections 420, 384, 120B, 411 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 36, 51, 52 & 53 of the Disaster Management Act. The allegation against the petitioner is that he was selling fake coupons of KASA Company to the flood victims. It is said that petitioner was not apprehended at the spot and nothing was recovered from his possession. It is also said that parties have entered into compromise and a compromise petition has been filed in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate in the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has produced the certified copy of the same for perusal by this Court. It is said that petitioner is in judicial custody since 8.7.2009 and he has no criminal antecedent. - 2 - Considering the above facts and circumstances, this application is allowed. Let petitioner (Anil Yadav @ Dipu @ Rabindra Yadav) be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No.7/09 with conditions as laid down in sub- section (3) of section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. B.T (J. N. Singh, J.)