1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.544 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.874 OF 2009 (Friends Social Circle and another vs. The Presiding Officer and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri M.V. Samarth, Advocate for appellants. Shri A.S. Fulzele, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos. 1 and 3. Shri A.S. Kilor, Advocate for respondent no.2. ------- CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE AND P.B.VARALE, JJ. DATED : JUNE 29, 2010 Counsel for appellants and respondent no.2 submit that the appellants and respondent no.2 have amicably settled their dispute and they have tendered compromise pursis duly signed by the Secretary of appellant no.1 and respondent no.2 and their respective Advocates. Compromise pursis is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. Learned Counsel for appellants submits 2 that insofar as respondent no.4 is concerned, she is a formal party to the appeal and, therefore, her consent is not required for disposing of the present appeal in terms of the compromise pursis. His statement is accepted. Insofar as respondent nos. 1 and 3 are concerned, they are not parties to the compromise pursis and hence, terms of compromise pursis are not binding on them. If appellants and/or respondent no.2 make any claim in future from respondent nos.1 and 3, same shall be considered in accordance with law. Subject to above, letters patent appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise pursis. JUDGE JUDGE khj