:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.722 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.722 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.722 OF 2006 Ram V. Narwani ...Petitioner. Versus Smt.Bhavna R. Narwani & Anr. ...Respondents. Ms. Anamika Malhotra i/b G.V. Bhagat & W.I.Shaikh for the Petitioner. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATE : 21st FEBRUARY, 2006. DATE : 21st FEBRUARY, 2006. DATE : 21st FEBRUARY, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. After having heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the order under challenge with her assistance, this is not a fit case for interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition dismissed. 2. The interim maintenance granted to the respondent-wife and to the children appears to be reasonable. However, the grievance of the petitioner-husband is that the trial Court has not adverted to all materials produced and that the wife is in a position to maintain herself. Needless to state that the remedy of the petitioner is to approach the trial Court for modification of the order of maintenance insofar as his wife; and such an application, if made, would be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law. :2: ( S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.) ( S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.) ( S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.)