mCiH CQIMT OF C1IHATTISCLARH ATBUASPUa S.B. : HON'BLE MIL SATISMK. AGNHIOTRI. J. WMTPETmON fSVNo. 1419<rf2007. PETITIONER RESEONDENTS ^' Smt. Biswantia Bai wife of RMiesh Lal Sonwaai, aged dwut 21 yaars, residenceof(haaaDho<taaNftvapaCT, Tahsil Kawarcflia, Distriet Kabir<fefun, Cbhattisgwh. VERSUS 1. State af CMattis^trii; liwo^h Secretory, Department of Wona^ and Child Welfare, Dmi Kfdyan Singb Bhawaa, Rmpur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Colleetor, Kalardhaai, Offioe situated at Kabadluun, District Kalar&am, Chhrttis^BEfa. 3. The Chief E^cutiw (MBcw, Jfla Panchayat; Distourt KaNrffliam Chhatfsgarh. 4. Disteiet Woman aad Cbild Devetopm^t Offieer, KAbiri Chhattisgarh. 5. Smt Bfawmesfawmi, wif® e£ Bisambar Nis&id, aged aboitf 25 yeazs, residence ofvillage E&odma Navapara, Tdisil Kawmto, Dishiet Kabirdftam, Chhattisgtffh. 6. Smt Saatosdii Bai, wife o£Rohit, aged about 22 ywzs, residence of vill^e Dhodma Navapara, T^sfl Kawardha, District Kabirdhtmi, Chhattisgarh. Presatt: Shri O.P.Sahu, Advocate forthepetitioner. Shri Sushil Dub^, Govemment Advocate fra- tiie respondent no, 1.2aad4. ORDER (Passed on 12th ofMarch,: 1. Leamed counsel appearing for Ihe petitioner subiaits Ihat fhe Additional CollectorKabhxiham, vide its otderdatied 27.12.2006 has cancelled the appointment of Ifae petitioner on &e severEd groinrfs inter alia, tiatthe petitioner was und«srageon die basasofcerrificate subnrittal by Snrt. Bhwneshwari and Smt. Santo^ Bai. 2, TTieleamedwuasel fartfwr states tfaat BQoppeu'^^cfheMMgwas affordedtothepetitioBCTfor(aioduciBgtiiedateofbirAcer(ificateas stated in her maA-sheet. Though 1fae petitioner's ^poiatmmt has beCT caacdled oa other grouads idso, howwCT ia tiie fects aad circumstemces of the case, when one of the gieuads is Ihat Ae petitioner was under age, sepipesas te haw not beea <s<»stdered properly. 3, The leaniedcouBsel appeariag for respondent 1, 2 mid 4 fiuriy submite feat the disputed facts involved here-in caa be decidad by the Additional Collector a fi-esh. 4. In view of that, fce order <^ed 27.12^006 (Annesaire P/l) is quashed. The matter is remanded- baek to tbe AdtBtiond Ceneetor. for fresh decision on tf basis of sBbmissions made by boife tfae parties and aitor examining the doeunneBts produced l^ tte petitioner aad also by Ihe re^ondeats 5 and 6 wiflria a period ofsix weeks fi'om the date ofreceipt ofa copy oflNs otdss. ^' 5. Conseque»tly, M(W)P 917/2007, wlieation for ad-iiitorim mit stmidsdisposedof. ___^ Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge Amit ^ >--