IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. WRIT P^!TION(S)JtO,7367 OF 2006 PETITIONER , Samay Lal Kripal S/o Shri Baijnath Kripal, aged about 40 years, Occupation -Assistant Teacher, R/o Village Karahni, Block Marwahi, District BILASPUR C.G. VERSUS RESPONDENTS .,1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur ^-2. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G. 3. Block Education Officer, Block Manwahi, District Bilaspur C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPMATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. MAV TH.TS-ELEASE TO YQUB T,ORnRH1P <• ffl-HC-78 gnSRT^iTR-<i+ gsiT sn^rsfiilN; 3^?^<i<^ i<<^ aTn+i'is, to). ^ W l^'' X£s^/c&C tTTqcTTShHlctl •^ 200 3ii^i Maw (yiflt'i'T) ?T<irwHl?(T3n^T 5-1.2007 Mr. Rakesh Pandey, Mr. Mr. Somkant Verma, courlsel Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, Govj Government Advocate, Advocate, Ms. Sunita Jai(), Panel Lawyer for the Stat^ With the consent of learnii matter is heard finally and dispo^ Common order dictated it opsn Court, passed ssparately. A copy of this ordsr be p^ petitions. ¥-- °t)i<<fn41-i iiinTfftei^<Ri+rii< ^sri^Tsn^T A.V.Shridhar, Mr. Ajay Shrivastava and for the petrtioner(s). irnment Advocate, Mr. Sushil Dubey, Ars. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Government i, Panel Lawyer and Mr. Arvind Dubey, •/respondents. >d counsel appearing for the parties, the ed of. Writ Petition (S.) No.7367 of 2006 in icsd on the record of the connscted writ Sdi- Satish KAgnihotri Judge P.T.O. T^ H!GH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATSSH K. AGiMiHQTRL J. l^. Petitioner Respondents WR!T PETITtON (S.) N0.73S7 OF 200S Samay La! Kripal versus State of Chhsttisgarh and others Petitioner Respondents WRiT PETITiON (S.i N0.7403 OF 2006 Bholanath Sahu versus State of C.G. and others r- ^- Petitioner Respondents WR1T PETiTSON (S.) N0.7398 OF 2006 Santosh Kumar Sahu versus SSate of C.G. and othe's WR!T PETITION (3.1 N0.7335 QF 2006 r Petitioner : Smt. Chandana Pal Versus Respojidente Stats of C.G. and others 0^\ WRST PET1T10N (S.) N0.7405 OF 2006 Petitioner Ramadhin Sahu yersys Reseondente State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and others WR1T PETITiON (S.) N0.7506 OF 200S Petitioner Bhawar Lal Dewangan yersus &esRonderrts The State Goyernmentof Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETSTION (S.) N0.7407 OF 2006 Petitioner Ram Narayan Tiwari r' versus Resjxindente The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETiTSON {S.) N0.7408 OF 200S Petitioner Sant Kumar Tandsn versus Resoondents State Govt. of Chhattisaarh and others WRIT PET!T!ON (S.) N0.7409 OF 2006 Petitioner Nand Kumar Verma Vereys Respondents State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and others WR!T PETITION (S.i N0.741_OOF 2006 Petitioner Basant Kumar Vaishna' versus Respondents The State GovernmenS of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PET1TION fS.) N0.7411 OF 2006 Petitioner Kanhaiya Das Sahu ¥'-• versus Respondents The State Governmsnt of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETiTION (S.) N0.7412 OF 2006 Petitioner Sunahere Das Sahu versus Respondents The State-Govemment of Chhattisgarh and another WR'T PETiTiON (S.) N0.7413 OF 2006 Pstitioner Menu Ram Ganware yersus ResBondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRST PETITION (S.i N0.7414 OF 2006 Petitioner Shankar Lai Chandrkar versus Respondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PET!T!ON SS.) N0.7415 OF 2006 Petitioner Lakhan Lal Aahir p ^" versus Respondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITiON (S.l N0.7416 OF 200S Petitjoner Kanhaiya Lai Sahu Respondents yersus The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETlTiON (S.) N0.7417 OF 200S P_B*lti6Ber SUube Das Ratre versus Respondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another t--.-.:- WR!T PETIT!ON iS.) N0.7418 OF 200S Petitjoner Dixit Kumar Sahu versus Respondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETSTION (S.) N0.7419 OF 2006 Petitioner Annoo Ram Deohare versus Respondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITiON (S.) N0.7420 OF 2006 Petitioner Ajit Ram Kuthariya versus Respondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another —— WR!T PETITION (S.) N0.7421 OF 2006 Petitioner Virendra Kumar Gatre versus Respondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another s- WRIT PET!T!ON (S.) N0.7422 OF 2006 Petitioner Dhani Ram Rawte versus Respondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WR!T PETITION !S.) N0.7423 OF 2006 Petitioner Bhagirathi Bharti versus Resppndente The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.7424 OF 2006 Petitioner Makhan Lal Sonkar versus Respondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRiT PETITION (SJ N0.7425 OF 2006 Petitioner Respondents versus Gowardhan Singh Urwasa The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another Present : Mr. Rakesh Pandey, Mr. A.V.Shridhar, Mr. Ajay Shrivastava and Mr. Somkant Verma, counsel for the petftioner(s). Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, Government Advocate, Mr. Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate, Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govemment Advocate, Ms. Sunita Jain, Panei Lawyer and Mr. Arvind Dubey, Pane! Lawyer for the State/respondents. QRDER :th (Passed on 5'" Day of January, 2007) Learned counse! appearing for the parties jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present bateh of writ petitions are squarely covsred by the decision of this Court in the cass of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj vs. Municipsl Corporation, Durg and another . 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesti Kumar Varma vs. Tha State Govt of Chhattisgarh and another) and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination, it was ciarified that the nomenciature of the Basic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingty, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are a!so covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma vs. The State Govf. of Chhattisgarh and anoffiser) (Supra). l^ 3. For the aforementioned reasons, the wnt petitions a.-e disposed of in .tsrms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T.i./D.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the cireulars dated 24-12- 1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether they have been paid tw/o advance increments or not. No order as to costs. T 4. A copy of this order be placed on the record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Sopal 1 2006 (!l) MPJR-CG 96