FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7388 OF 2011 "Manisha w/o. Jalindar Hivare Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. Nitin V. Gaware, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi, AGP for respondent No.1 Mr. S.T. Shelke, Avocate for respondent Nos. 2 to 4. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 8TH DECEMBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] The limited grievance raised in the petition is that, the impugned order which terminates the services of the petitioner has been passed without even issuing any show cause notice to the petitioner. The said contention is not disputed by the learned counsel for the Zilla Parishad. 2] By now, it is a settled principle of law, that no order inviting adverse civil consequences to a citizen can be made without following the principles of natural. In that view of the matter, the impugned order dated 9.8.2011, terminating the services of the petitioner is quashed and set aside. The matter is remitted back to the respondent No.2 for considering it afresh, by following the principles of natural justice. [M.T. JOSHI,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-