IN •EHE HB3H COUR-r 07 JUDICATURE AT BIIASP0R (C.S.) WRZT EEIITION HO. 3'3>S OF 20Q2 BETWEEN Hari Shanker ftgrawal S/o airl Bisahu lal Agrawal, aged about 41 years, Proprietor of w/s Maa Jagdamba Rice Mill, BBrrattoata (ServiceNo. 506360 ), Vt/o Barraldiata, Tsihsil and Sistrict Tanjgir ./; ^°\^ <?<• ^ <-'^"',/' '^^"" &•>* .^^ •''y^ .^"^ ^^'..^ ..^.^^ sy^y EETITIONER A N D 1. fflie ctihattisgarh Sta-te EXectrlcity Board, Sbrough its Eeesiden-fc, Raipur. 2. 'ttte Ghief Engineer, G.S.S.B. Bilaspur , Bilaspur nlvlsion ,Bilaspur (GG). t- 3. ®ieSuperlritending Sigineer. Qihattisgarh State fileG-triGity Board, (Vttt) Bilaspur, Btstrict Bllaspur. l3ie ExeeuUve Engineer, (O&M), G^a» Ghampa, Distriet Janjglr Champa. •ihe Junior. Engineer , eSEB, ghanipa (Town) , Distriet Janjgir Champa. RBSPCNaENTS WRIT PETX'rlON USDBR ARTXCLES 226/227 OFIHE CONSTI'EU'riON OF INOIA ....02,1 XI-HC-22 aiAa^il ft'li?* 3)lt?I s»t+l '9%tf '3^ "Ml'yict'il, aifllwre, ft«yii<:iy Cs^ •flWtl SttHlch . ^•i.:ff:.tvS:...^Mj:t! ^ ^...^.............^......y...^^ ^^ ^^sr' <gi^i ^aiwgfer 26-8-2002 coudsel &r Ireela SIiri Prashant Jaiswal, Shri R.S. Jaiswal, counsel Heari. 'Hie xnain chalfcn^ in fhis dated 22-11-2001, copy whcreo^ whereby the pctitioner taas Rs.1,69,255/- wifhin a perkxl of| under Sectfou 40 6f Madfaya Recovexy] Act, 1961. It is fhe whoUy fllegal & unwarranted andj petitionei^ thc nieter was made by the petitioncr w^ not defeetive meter he hasbeen cate defectdre caUed|upon hfc ' 'bl-tlfcf'til-l 11*<<-it4fe'A <.P«4K ^ aiPtCT siit^t for fUe petitfoner. the rcspondente. |writ pctition is to tiic noticc of dcmand is Annexuxc P-1 to thc writ petition, caUed upon to deposit a siun of fhaec naonfhs fiom the date ofnottec, I'radcsh Electrieal Uadertakiiqjs [Dues ofthe jpetitiolter fhat fhe dHnaod is liable to be quE^hcd. Aceoixlm^ to tibfi which insplte of fhe representation ' recjtified / »eplacedaad thaa on account of to pay electricily chai^s whjch in ofpowcr. On fhe conteary, it is fhc A. fact he has aot constuned fhat nitich case of fhc petitioner fhat thcre ^as been Soine excessivc billmg and.is entitled to refund. Accordin^, of deniand and for a direction to 1 -/<••^ has prayed for qu^htag of the notfce 1 jfhe opposite parly to restorc the power suppty, which was.disconnected aijtd for refund ofexces^»ainourit paid. fq^^fe^ —1- XI-HG-22 'g^?';?iT2ll^ra, a'a)i<;f*i®,•RK'H'Hy sii^r^ii [<t-li?b 3IRSI sft*ii<:ft <tt?a *11*1CTI %fl|ct) ^3M.lO'i-"WI. 200 l^sr' 3D^[ t^IIW 'SiOT 2- On being noticed.thc oppo( denied the icUef clauned. It is sultnuttcd was nottung wipiig in the metB| clectricily chai^cs thc power Unc] ofdeinand was issucd in accordafecc with law. During fhe pcndcncy of fhi been soinc ic-fhinldng / settleme: inade by the teamed couasd, fhis follown^ terms and coiiditfons: 1. That, fhe petitionw Electricity Board a sum o: itnder. (^ The first instaUmenl 20-9-2002. undeiftakcs ilus 2. That, onpaymentoffiTstija fhe EIectricity Board shap =t>14i<'l4i')*<|f4i'i( 4fe^t<&l*iK ^? siPtW an^i iite partfes have entered appcarariee and by fhc teamea counsel that thcre and as fhc petitioncr was not paying was discoiuiected aad fhereafter noticc b wnt petitioa, it appears fhat fhere has nt betwecn &e parties and ori fheprayer writ petition is bciag disposed ofon the and shall pay to thc respondcnt ,.{•' ' ':' ; . ^ . ;:' ' T .; ! . Rs.1,69,255/- in tiuce instaBments as ofRs.l Lac sIiaUibe paid on ar befiae- (b) Tfae seeond mstaBiDJeDt of Rs.35,000/- shall be paid an or before 30-10-2002. (c) TbK fhud iustallme^ut of Rs.34,255/- ishaU be paid oa or befbre 15-12-2002. itaUineatofRs.lLao as directed abovc, give a ficsh power counection to fhe A 1%^^)8RF XI-HC-22 ,'ff_».•• 'g^ •<<i<ii<'i<<; ®!tliy<re, sii^i wr. c? K-ii.* 3i)tB ~ai*)iq;i%tf^a ..;'. / ^sr' ^ ^^^, WHS11 »*lt«»AA'A.ifesy>^^ •SH^TS^KU^R -afea -3- payinejnt pctitiQncr^s finn on wifh the demand note whl petitioner and after fulfiUi^ in ptpyiding a fires^ cona4ction 3. period of one wcek fioia f4< by fhe petitioner. ' at, in case ofdefault ia the State Electrkaty Boar^ powcr suppty m govemmg fhe field. of Goitnection charges in accordancc ch shaU be issued by fhe Board to fhe icnt of neccssaxy formalities, the action shaU be taken proinptty wifhin a ic date of deposit of connection cUarges accoiddnce t>aynicnt of second or fhird mstaUinent, shaU be at Mberly to disconaect fhe wifh fheir rutes aad regulatfon Wifb fhe above Observation disposcd of. Conscquenft; No.4852/2002 also stand dispo dispo^ed *i«feKil-i•itWi'if'ij^'&'tRd^^ ^Taafigg^iteT |ai^l dncctu>n, fhis writ peti.tion staads M.(W)P. No. 7T7/2002 & I.A. of. Sd/- P. C. Naik Judge E