IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6094 of 2011 VIVEK KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.04.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion of the petition. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The accusation is of assault with Lathi and Iron rod and resorted to firing. The supplementary affidavit has been filed by the petitioner that injury was caused. Though the accusation is of committing theft. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the since the petitioner purchased the land from the nephew of the informant. Hence, the informant filed the title suit and as a pressure tactics the present case has been lodged. Considering the aforesaid facts, let 2 the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No. 73 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)