IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1704 of 2007 Smt.Tanama Versus P.K.Basu, Secretary, Urban Development, Govt. of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- 5. 16.9.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Additional show cause has been filed on behalf of Nagar Parishad after serving a copy of the same on the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of the opposite party that the order of this Court has been complied with and admissible payments have been made. As a matter of fact, the petitioner had been paid a sum of Rs.18,000/- and odd in excess. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on perusal of the calculation chart with respect to provident fund dues, it would appear that the interest has been calculated only up to 2003- 04. Learned counsel for Nagar Parishad, on the other hand, submits that the petitioner retired on 31st of January, 2004 and as such, even after taking some interest, which would be payable to the petitioner, the same would stand adjusted in the excess amount of Rs.18,000/- and odd and thereafter also some amount would be recoverable from the petitioner. Considering the submissions of the parties and the show cause, I am not inclined to proceed further in the matter. The contempt application stands disposed of. However, if there is any discrepancy in the calculation of interest, if any, it will be open for the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the authority concerned. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)