IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14324 of 2009 DILIP MISTRY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 13.11.2009 On a confidential information received by the police that certain criminals had assembled to commit a cognizable offence, a raid was carried out in the village Mathurapur. The police managed to apprehend some persons which included the present petitioner. A loaded country made pistol with certain explosives were found from his possession. Case therefore came to be registered under sections 399/402 of the Indian Penal Code read with some offences of the Arms Act as well as sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act. Contention of the counsel is that petitioner has been in custody nearing a year . It is an old case under the Arms Act in which he has already been enlarged on bail. It is further stated that if the petitioner is given yet another opportunity he shall not commit any crime and is willing to abide by any condition. Looking at the period the petitioner has remained in custody with an assurance of good conduct, let petitioner Dilip Mistry be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in Sikandra P S Case No. 280 of 2008. One of the surety is to be executed by the father-in-law of the petitioner on due identification and the other by a close blood relation. - 2 - Let it be recorded that the petitioner shall desist himself from indulging in any offence after release on bail. He shall further appear on each and every date either through himself or through his counsel before the trial court. If the petitioner is found to be indulged in any serious crime then the prosecution will have freedom to seek cancellation of bail even in this case, in view of the solemn statement having been made to the court about leading a clean life after release on bail. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)