IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-9954 of 2010 Date of Decision: May 05, 2010 Sukhdev Singh & Others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. H.S. Dhandi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.315 dated 3.7.2009 under Sections 302, 201, 34 IPC, registered with Police Station, Sadar, Patiala. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in deference to Order dated 5.4.2010, the petitioners have already appeared before the Trial Court and have been released on bail. The petitioners have been summoned Crl. Misc. No. M-9954 of 2010 [2] under Section 319 Cr.P.C. as additional accused. In such circumstances, presence of the petitioners was required to be secured which has been done. The investigating agency, after investigation, found the petitioners to be innocent and therefore, one opinion of innocence is available on the record. It would be for the Trial Court to see on the conclusion of trial whether there is sufficient evidence to convict the petitioners or not. Be that as it may, no useful purpose in law would be served by keeping the petitioners in custody. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. The petitioners shall furnish fresh bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. It is however made clear that the petitioners shall appear as and when required by law before the Trial Court and shall not delay the process of trial. (AJAI LAMBA) May 05, 2010 JUDGE avin Crl. Misc. No. M-9954 of 2010 [3] 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?