IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.226 of 2011 RAVI BHUSHAN PRASAD VERMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 3 22.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner stating therein to the effect that the first information report has been lodged on the complaint of the petitioner vide Rajgir P.S. Case No. 24 of 2011 as contained in Annexure-7. Petitioner is appears in person and submits that that on the request of the petitioner the case has been directed to be investigated by the senior police officials, and as such, the grievance of the petitioner have been redressed to a large extent. He, however, submits that on account of lodging of the aforesaid case petitioner and his family members are getting threats from the accused persons. Learned counsel for the State submits that in case petitioner brings it to the notice of the concerned Superintendent of Police the same would be looked into as per law. In the above circumstances, notwithstanding the fact that first information report has been lodged against the accused persons, in case petitioner has any apprehension of danger or threat at the hands of the accused persons it will be open for him to bring it to the notice of the concerned Superintendent of Police with cogent information which would be looked into and remedial measures would be taken as per law. The writ application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)