IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 23 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 396 OF 2007 SHRI. PUNDALIK K. USKAIKAR ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. GAJANAN K. USKAIKAR ... Respondent Mr. A. D. Bhobe,Advocate for the petitioner. Coram:- SMT. R. S. DALVI, J. Date:- 16th April, 2009 P.C. On 31/8/2007, the respondent through his Advocate undertook not to prevent the petitioner from entering into the suit premises and conducting his business therein. That undertaking was accepted. The respondent had to abide that undertaking. It is the petitioner's case that when the petitioner tried to enter upon the suit shop, he was prevented. Hence, the contempt petition was taken out. The notice is issued upon the respondent. The respondent has filed his reply. The respondent has admitted passing of the order dated 31.08.2007. The entire contents of the affidavit show that whereas the respondent would abide the order, the petitioner has not and has committed contempt of the order of the Court. 2. Since the undertaking is given and since the giving of the undertaking is admitted, the respondent is directed to allow the petitioner to enter upon the suit shop and conduct his business therein. The petitioner shall be entitled to police assistance from relevant police station, if the respondent prevents the petitioner from entering upon the suit shop. The petitioner shall inform the Court if the respondent once again prevents the petitioner. The contempt petition is disposed of accordingly. SMT. R. S. DALVI, J. SMA