IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9319 of 2009 ***** Ajay Kumar son of late Kishun Prasad, resident of village- Gaur Rauza, P.O. Madhopur, Police Station-Gautam Budha Nagar (Tarwara), Block-Maharajganj, District-Siwan. …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Divisional Commissioner, Saran Division at Chapra. 3. The District Magistrate, Siwan. 4. The Sub Divisional Officer-cum-Licensing Authority, Maharajganj, District-Siwan. 5. The District Supply Officer, Siwan. 6. The Block Supply Officer, Maharajganj, District-Siwan. …. …. Respondents 7. Shri Shriniwas Singh, son of Late Suryadeo Singh, resident of village- Balia Patti, P.O. Jalalpur, Police Station- Gautam Budha Nagar (Tarwara), District-Siwan. …. …. Private Respondent ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. N.K.Agrawal, Senior Advocate Mr. U.K. Mishra, Advocate For the State : Md. Anis Akhtar, Assistant Counsel to Additional Advocate General-X For Private Respondent : Mr. U.B.Singh, Advocate ------------ 5. 7.9.2009. Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioner filed the writ application for a restraint order to be passed upon the respondent authorities not to change or transfer the License No.M89/2007 dated 2.8.2007 in favour of any other person or society, which the petitioner claims is the license in his own right as a citizen. The brief background, as stated in the writ application, is that initially though the license was issued in favour of the Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society, Gaur Rauja, Circle-Maharajganj in the district of Siwan, when subsequently the license was renewed after due deliberations it has been issued in the name of the petitioner and he is the owner or the claimant under the said license. But from the perusal of the original license which came to be issued, which is on record as Annexure- - 2 - 8, it is evident that the license was issued in favour of the Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society because the father of the petitioner happen to be the chairman of the said Society at the relevant time. Subsequently it seems the petitioner somehow managed to get the endorsement of his name on the said license, even the current license also bears the endorsement which shows that the word, “Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society” does exist. If the origin of the license and the issuance of the same was to the Agricultural Society, by no stretch of imagination, it can be said that the petitioner had a right to claim the same to be his personal property because his name figured in the license. Obviously, there is something amiss which this Court does not want to probe in great detail. The license will be considered to be in the name of the Society and the petitioner has no claim on it in his personal capacity. The writ application has no merit. It is dismissed accordingly. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)