IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 332 of 2009 With Stay Application No.3075/2009 Anil Kumar S/o Ram Avtar Prasad. ……. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ……. Respondents Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. G.A for the respondent nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent no. 4. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. G.A for the respondent nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent no. 4. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. On due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; the contents of the F.I.R; the documents annexed with the petition by the parties; the averments made in the F.I.R as well as in the documents; and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any good ground to grant relief to the petitioner as claimed in the petition. Thus, the petition is liable to be dismissed, however, I am refraining from commenting on the merits of the case lest it may adversely affect the petitioner’s case at the trial, which is yet to start. 4. In view of above, the petition is dismissed summarily. The stay application stands disposed of accordingly. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 23.04.2009 V.K.