IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(s.)No. ML1§33 /2oo9 PETITIONER : Sheetal Prasd Sahu, s/o. Ramdhan Sahu, Aged About R/o Villege 38 Years, panderbhatta, Tahsil Mungeli, District Bilaspur (C.G.) g. ’yin)’ ‘ VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) '2. The District Education Officer Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 3. The Block Education Ofiicer, Block Navagarh, District Durg (C. G.) // WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN. NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. _ I \ m.? aaqQLL2003 mm (Wu) ’wmamia: mmm * - WWW fs‘aW amfmm SB HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE Pm’I‘INKER Di‘WAKER '20 8 2009 Lhe petmoncr. the State Contention of the petit ; 1s that hls case 1s squa ew covered with the decision of the .Supreme Lourt and also varxous orders passed by this Court in id ntical matters Counsel for the peutlone at th1s stage wants to w1thdraw thxs petmon W1th hberty to fxle representatlon belore the respondent No. 1. He further su ts that dlrectlon may be Issued for deciding the representat so made by the petitioner, expeditiously. ts that at this stage he is not in a position to make any state as to Whether the case'of the petitioner is covered by the or er passed in the aforementioned identical writ petition. He how er submits that let the petition make a representation to thelr spondent No. 1 which would be decided strictly in accordance wi h lawi AcCordingly, the petition dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. In the eventuality of filing any such representation by the petitioner thin a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of his order, the same is expected to Shm ‘xIRathore, counsel Shri Vivek Shanna, P.L. Counsel for the State Sub z/ sw- /’ Pr'mnker Judge Dwvake‘" ‘ f f i e I i i m t i i vz