IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10539 of 2010 SURSARI DEVI W/O LATE RAM DULAR SHARMA R/O MOHALLA- GUDARI RAI KA CHOUK, P.O.+P.S.- BHAGWAN BAZAR, DISTT.- SARAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA-1 null null 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, B.R.A. BIHAR UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR 3. THE REGISTRAR, B.R.A. BIHAR UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR 4. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, J.P.UNIVERSITY, CHAPRA 5. THE REGISTRAR, J.P.UNIVERSITY, CHAPRA ----------- 02. 08.07.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State as also the respondents - B.R.A. Bihar University and J.P. University. It is submitted that husband of the petitioner retired from the post of Head Clerk from Rajendra College, Chapra on 30th of November 1995 and later died on 30th of November 1996. It is further submitted that husband of the petitioner has been paid the retiral dues from the J.P. University. However, the grievance with regard to the merger of 50 percent D.A. to the basic pension has not been settled presumably on account of issue pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. In this regard, counsel for the J.P. University submits that admittedly husband of the petitioner retired on 30th of November 1995 and as such, the entitlement of merger of 50 percent to the basic pension is doubtful. Notwithstanding the above, counsel for the petitioner 2 submits that petitioner has large amount dues and which has remained to be paid by the B.R.A. Bihar University as per the calculation chart prepared by the College as contained in annexure-1. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- University submits that the claims of the petitioner need to be verified and examined. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as contained in Annexure - 1, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 2. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)