^ ^.:-A^ ,,, ^. v -(V IN THE mOH COURT OF TUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CC.G.) WRITPE37TIGNNO. Zz-Z {. OF 2904 PETITIONER : D. R. a-va^t, S/o Kesba^ i Hi%at, Age about 46 Years, ORaqiaSicai'.AsstCQrrarissioaeT ^^ ^^ ,,.^>^"-" '^0' TriM Welfsre Dqartment, Duig(C.G.) ?£S ya RESPONDBWS: (1) State of Chhsittisgsrii, Through Secrrteay, Tribal Welfare Departmart, D. K. S. Btdldmg, Rapur(C.G.) (2) The ColledOT, E&stt Dmg (C.G.). (3) A G. Burman, Disteict Ckgarisation Indiarge Prqject offica', ESAiknt Aadivasd V^SEE Prqjed, Jaslqwr (C.G.) WRTTPBmJON U/A 226/227 OF THE CCNSFITTUnCN OF B^DIA sr^i'S-f"- XI-HC-78 *il*1CTI ®1T?» g-faci '^ll^!dAI, is-alx-ris, ieiomat .^.^:.^o..s^2;£.... sii^amf^trai aW3II^?T*>li4> ^K-^^^S^ *> yi»i'!s|iBfct^Ei!SS»' "'""' " ""~^°:'. •' 3TI^?T iW? (yiigq^) ^ g^TiR^lfeTSII^ST *l<l(rt41'! t<l*ldT;^'ls'<l •(Rntcn ^aif^T3li^?T 16.11.2005 Shri Awadh Tripafhi, ^ouusel for the petitioner. Sltri^Pankaj Shrivasta^a, Panel fawyer for the i~espondents No. 1 and'2. Shri Satish Chaadra \ferma, couiisel for the respondent No. 3 Heard. Learaed coiinsel for office of Adivasi Vikas, Du^ Distt.- Durg. Subsequent to the petitioner subinits fhat flie petitioner who was workui^ as Assistaat Coinmissioner in the was transfen-ed vide order dated 9.1.2004 (Annexure P-3)to P^-oject Adininistration, Dondi Lohara, the said order, a represeutation was inade by the petitioner. The|respoudents after having considered the representEitiou of the pe^itioner, trausferred the petitiouer to the office ofAdivasi Vikas, E|urg vide order dated 13.7.2004. The petitioner jouied fhe of&ce c| The petitioner was again tr< , Durg as In-charge of \ petition irapugns the order d^ 'f Adivasi Vikas, Diu-g on 9.8.2004. luisferred on 2.9.2004 froni Adivasi pie Project Administrator, Integrated Tribal Welfare Project, Nag£|ri, Distt- Dhamtad. The preseut ^ted 02.09.2004 and this court, after heailag botli the parties, gra^ited status quo on 28.09,2004. The petitioner contiiiued at Adiva^i VIkas, Durg pursuaat to the order of fhis court for inore fhaii ajyear. This is for the goveminent to XI-HC-78 VJCT) ^l^lri^, u>-al'<i<is, Ri«w3'< .L^.-.?.; ?J. ?.'..s.2'.2^.6 gii^^wfeira ganan^?Tfb*ll<b s-^.. ,^ s*» SIT^ST <RR? (yig'si^) s^nw^asn^sT —2-— examine as to whefher the ^oveminent eiuployee be posted iii fhe iaterest of adinuustration. workfaig at fhe original plac by fhis court. At this stagf validity ofthe impugued tra^isfer order. In view of the facts petition is disposed of. As r iffl<liri41'1 MINd) fffe'cl xluifcix ^?3lKl*l 911^91 The petitioner has ah-eady been on accoilnt of interiin reUef graated fhere is no poiat in exs thig fhe ^uid circuiiistaiices of the case, fhe igard the otiier grievaaces, ifany, fhe petitioner is at Uberty to In^ke proper represeutation beforc fhe respondent No. 1 aud 2. Certified copy, as per |?ules. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge