Crl.M.No. M-26461/2010(O&M) #1# IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M.No. M-26461/2010(O&M) Date of decision:12.11.2010. Ram Singh ....................Petitioner v. State of Haryana .....................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present: Mr.D.R. Punia,Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Mahabir Sindhu, Addl.AG Haryana Jaswant Singh.J.(Oral) Prayer under Section 439 Cr.P.C is for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.110 dated 28.6.2010 under Sections 324/452/506/326/34 IPC, P.S Bhattu Kalan District Fatehabad. Facts in brief are that the injured-complainant is 16 years old child residing at her maternal grand-mother's place whereas his widowed mother was residing in her matrimonial home. On the day of occurrence, the assailants, who are uncles (chacha and taus) of the complainant are alleged to have inflicted nine sharp injuries with their weapons on account of land dispute, when the child had come to visit his widowed mother during vacations. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner (tau of the complainant-child) is in custody since 3.7.2020 Crl.M.No. M-26461/2010(O&M) #2# and that challan in the present case has been presented besides the fact that offence under Section 326 IPC has been added later on. Learned state counsel, on instructions from ASI Om Parkash does not refute that the challan in the present case has been presented. He points out that one of the injuries found on the chin of the child was opined to be suffering a Mandible fracture. He further submits that keeping in view the manner and the number & nature of injuries, petitioner does not deserve the concession of bail. Mere filing of challan by itself would not give right of concession of bail. Without commenting upon merit of the case and keeping in view the manner of infliction and the nature of injuries and the possibility of the petitioner's tampering with the evidence, I find no case for grant of regular bail. Dismissed. 12.11.2010 (Jaswant Singh) manoj Judge