CRM No. M-8608 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. M-8608 of 2009 Date of decision: 27.03.2009 Dalbir Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Baljinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Rajan Gupta, J. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the transaction in question pertains to the year 2006 while the instant FIR has been lodged on 8th January, 2009. According to the learned counsel, the petitioners are assembling Roschel Machine. Since the complainant was not able to make the payment of the machine, which was assembled on an order placed by the complainant, a civil suit was also preferred, copy whereof is annexed to this petition as Annexure P-4. Learned counsel also submits that while lodging the FIR, the complainant concealed the factum of pendency of the civil suit. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners. It is evident that the petitioners have approached this Court at the stage when investigation of the case is still pending and the investigating agency is looking into the matter. Under the circumstances, learned counsel has submitted CRM No. M-8608 of 2009 2 that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition with liberty to present his version before the Investigating Officer. He further submits that in case still aggrieved, he may be given liberty to approach this Court by way of a fresh petition. It is thus directed that the investigating agency shall consider the version of the petitioners. In case the petitioners are still aggrieved, they will be at liberty to avail of the remedy available to them under the law. Dismissed as withdrawn. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE March 27, 2009 'rajpal'