IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN THURSDAY, THE 15TH OCTOBER 2009 / 23RD ASWINA 1931 LA.App..No. 301 of 2004() ------------------------- LAR.465/1997 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,PARAVUR .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------ STATE OF KERALA BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI P.K. BABU. RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------- 1. KOCHURAMAN SHANMUGHAN, MANIPPARAMBIL, KAITHARAM MURI. (DIED) 2. MONY S/O. KUMARAN, KANNAMPARAMBIL, KAITHARAN MURI (DIED) 3. DEVAKI KUMARAN W/O. K.K.KUMARAN, KANNAMPARAMBIL, KAITHARAM P.O., CHERIYAPPILLY, N.PARAVUR. 4. V.S.MANJERI S/O. LATE K.K.MONY, KANNAMPARAMBIL, DO. DO. 5. K.M.RESHMI W/O. RAMMOHAN, PALIYATH, KANNAMPARAMBIL, DO. DO. 6. K.M.MURPHY D/O. LATE K.K.MONY KANNAMPARAMBIL, DO. DO. 7. K.M.ANUMOD S/O. LATE K.K.MONY, DO. DO. DO. ADDL.R 8 TO 13 IMPLEADED: R8: BHARATHI, W/O. KOCHURAMAN SHANMUGHAN, MANIPARAMBIL, KAITHARAM KARA, KAITHARAM P.O. LAA 301/2004 2 R9: SHAJI M.S., S/O. KOCHURAMAN SHANMUGHAN, MANIPARAMBIL, KAITHARAM KARA, KAITHARAM P.O. R10: DILEEP, S/O KOCHURAMAN SHANMUGHAN, MANIPARAMBIL, KAITHARAM KARA, KAITHARAM P.O. R11: SHALINI, W/O. MOHANDAS, THONDANKULANGARA, SOUTH OF THRIVENI JUNCTION, KANDANKULANGARA P.O. R12: BINDU, W/O. MOHANAN, PATHIYAPARAMBU, KANDAKARNANVELI, KAITHARAM P.O. R13: SHEELA, W/O. MOHANAN, EDAKKATTIL, THAMMANIMATTOM, KOLENCHERI P.O. (R8 TO R13 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER ON I.A.NO.3318/06 ON I.A. NO.3318/2006 DATED15.10.2009) ADV. SRI.P.JACOB VARGHESE, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R3 TO R7 SRI.VIVEK VARGHESE P.J. FOR R3 TO 7 SRI.T.R.ASWAS FOR ADL.R8TO13 SRI.ANIL KUMAR SREEDHARAN FOR ADDL.R8TO13 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & V.K.MOHANAN, JJ. ---------------------------------------- LAA. No.301 OF 2004 ---------------------------------------- Dated, the 15th October , 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. The appeal is field by the State challenging enhancement of compensation granted by reference court. However, we find that the judgment is based on another judgment of the same court enhancing compensation against which no appeal is field. Further we find that enhancement is not excessive because the land is on the road side in a fairly good area. We therefore, dismiss the appeal filed by the State. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE kvm/- -:2:- V.K.MOHANAN, J. O.P.No. JUDGMENT Dated:..