1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION No. 2874/2011. Mahesh Vithalrao Parchake and others -VERSUS- The State of Maharashtra and others. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : 23.06.2011. Heard Shri D.P. Chambare, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Shri Kankale, learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 3. After hearing, it is apparent that the allegations are against operator of SETU Center. It is contended that though required affidavits could have been given to the petitioners on 10.06.2011 itself, deliberately the same were given on 11.06.2011 and hence petitioners could not file their nomination papers within time. 2 Shri Chambhare, learned counsel for petitioners contends that political opponents of petitioners managed everything and saw to it that petitioners could not get opportunity to file their nominations on last date. Necessary factual averments are missing in the petition and the persons against whom malafides are alleged, are also not impleaded as party to the petition. Not only this, the contentions raised are question of facts and can be dealt with in proceedings under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. Hence with liberty to petitioners to take recourse to that remedy, present petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Rgd