ast 1 wp3252.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3252 OF 2010 Runja Laxman Lokhande ....Petitioner Vs. The Collector, Nashik & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.R.D.Soni, advocate for petitioner. Mr. V.S.Gokhale, AGP for Respondent-State. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND R.M.SAVANT, JJ DATED:- MAY 4, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, by consent. Mr. Gokhale, AGP waives notice for Respondents. 3. As short question is involved, petition is taken up for final disposal forthwith, by consent. 4. It is noticed from the record that in the proceedings under the provisions of Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act(ULC Act), it was held that the Petitioner holds and possesses land, which was vacant surplus land. However, admittedly possession of the said vacant surplus land was not taken ast 2 wp3252.10.sxw by the Authorities before the repeal of ULC Act. It is on that premiss, this Court allowed the Writ Petition preferred by the Petitioner bearing Writ Petition No. 3295 of 2008 decided on 16th September, 2008. As incidental to the said order, the Authorities were expected to take necessary steps including to delete/modify/restore the mutation entry in respect of the land in question in favour of the petitioner. Inspite of repeated representation, that has not been done. In this background, we have no hesitation in allowing this Writ Petition in terms of prayer clause (a) to (c) with no order as to costs. Ordered accordingly. (R.M. SAVANT, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)