FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION No.6126 OF 2006. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Court or Judge’s Order. Memorandum of Coram : apperance,Court’s : Orders & Directions : and Registrar’s : Order. : -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Chandrakant Bidkar,Advocate for the Petitioner. CORAM:R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J. CORAM:R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J. CORAM:R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J. DATED:21ST DATED:21ST DATED:21ST DECEMBER, 2006. DECEMBER, 2006. DECEMBER, 2006. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner challenges order dated 17th April,2006 passed under Exh.2 in Appeal No.25 of 2006. Undisputedly, the impugned order is an ad-interim relief granted at the time of issuance of notice in the appeal to the petitioner.Nothing prevents the petitioner from approaching the School Tribunal for necessary modification or vacating the ad-interim order passed in the matter. Undisputedly, the facts based on which the interference is [ 2 ] sought for were not available before the School Tribunal at the time when interim ex-parte order was passed. In the circumstances, there is no case for interference in the impugned order in exercise of power of writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution. The petitioner has ultimate efficacious remedy available to seek necessary redressal in the matter before the Tribunal. The petition therefore, fails and is hereby rejected. (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.) (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.) (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.)