IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA WRIT PETITION NO : 2087 of 2005 Between: Singrambotla Sreedhar, s/o Krishnamurthy, Presently working as Clerk, r/o Dr.No.9-136, Upstairs, Ramalayam Street, Nandikotkur Town, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 2 The Circle Inspector of Police, Nandikotkur, Kurnool District. 3 The Sub Inspector of Police, Nandikotkur, Kurnool District. 4 Sri Bheemisetty Jayaram, s/o Nagaiah Setty, Opp.Elementary School, Subba Rao Pet, Nandikotkur, Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in interfering with the civil disputes between petitioner and 4th respondent herein at the instance of 4th respondent herein as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to call the petitioner to the police station without following due process of law and pass such other order or orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.S.REDDY Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3: GP FOR HOME The Court at the stage of admission made the following : ORDER:. Heard. The complaint of the petitioner is that he has been harassed by the respondents 2 and 3 by calling him to the Police Station quite often in order to settle a private dispute between the petitioner and the 4th respondent. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondents 2 and 3, it is stated that neither such interference has ever been caused nor there is any need to call the petitioner to the Police Station. It is further stated in the counter affidavit that the respondents 2 and 3 are not keen in settling the private disputes. However, it is needless to mention that the investigating agency shall act strictly in accordance with law, without making dent to the right of the citizen conferred under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. _________________ D.S.R. VARMA, J DATED: 02.03.2005 Ka To 1 The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 2 The Circle Inspector of Police, Nandikotkur, Kurnool District. 3 The Sub Inspector of Police, Nandikotkur, Kurnool District. 4. 2 CCs to G.P. for Home, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT) 5. 2 CD Copies.