HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Wnt^Petition {SlNo. S156 af_2WB Petitioner .f Respondents Uday Bhan Diwedi, aged about ^ years, S/o. Shri Kamta Prasad Dswedi, R/o. Kuwanrpur, Distt. - Korea (CG). Versus 1. Stete of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rura! Deveiopment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. ColSector, Korea, Distt. Korea (CG). 3. Janpad Panchayat, Bharatpur, through Its Chief Executive Officer, Distt. Korea (CG). (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: MT. Vinay Pandey eounsel for the petiti&ner. Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advocate GeneraS for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on this 15th riay of September, 2008) With the consent of teamed counset appearing for the parties, the petition Is heard finaily. 2) Leamed counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merits, at fiils stage. However, the petitioner may be permltted to make a representation before ftie concemed authorities within a period of three days and the same may be directed to be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within the prescribed tlme. 3) Mr. Y.S. Thakur, fearned Deputy Advocate Genera! appearing for the State submsts that ifthe representation is made, the same shall be consldered and decided by the concerned auttiority, in accordance with iaw, on te own merite, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 4) Mr. Thakur further submits that no coercive sieps shatl be tak@Fi against the petitioner, tilithedisposalofthe representaton. 5) I hope and trust that the State Govemment shati examine the representation objectively in accordance with Saw and guktelines, issued by the Government time to time 6) In view of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed dF. No order as to coste. Consequently, pending appiications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge