IN THE HON'BLE HIGH 001m OF CHEATTIsGAaH AT BILWUR w.P.No. WLS’ /2ooh c {Mabéb n co N .u Petitioner - Dr. K. P. Chandrakar Asst'b.szrgeon, mil No. 10401 PPG-2004 Aged #8 years, s/o late Yadav Ram Chandrakar Village - ImgUda Pest — Sikosa. Tah. & mat-lawm- VerWSo Re$ondazts - (1) State Govt. of c.G. ‘ "\ %r0’ The Secretary (Health servi ce) DnK¢SQBhaW’ Raipur. (2) Directorate oi Medical Education C.G. Thro' The mrector, Health Service,C.G. D.K.S. Bhawan: Raipur. Writ petition under Arucle 226/227 oi Constitution oi of India. XI—Hc-zz % W w‘p .gu 1g/2ao4 " '5" a; " . E .................................... 200 1 ..............................................m ................................................ m Em fawi-m"m WW mmmm mm WW % Wattm 25l08l2004 Shri N.L. Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.K. Agarawal, Deputy Advocate General for the Sate. Heard on admission. By this writ petition under Arti le 2262227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the act on of respondent whereby weightage of 10 marks has been given to the cand dates who’ have sewed two years in the rural area. in pursuant to this Court’ order dated 02/07/2004 passed in Writ Petition No.1248l2004. Petitioner’s case is that he h served more than twenty years in the rural area, therefore, looking to his length of service in the rural area he ought to have been given weight ge of 100 marks. . Therefore, giving weightage of 1O marks to those cand dates who have served two years in the rural area. the interest of the petitione has been adversely affected. At the outset, it is necessa to mention that the petition of the petitioner is totally misconceived. T e writ petition No.1248/2004 was filed . by those ‘candidates who, had serve in the rural area in compliance of the (‘7 Pre-PG Rules, 2002 and aner frami g new of Rules, 2004, their claim was u totally ignored, that is why Division Bench of this Court in the above writ petition passed an order on 02/07/20 4 that in view of the fact that petitioners who had served in the'rural service a per Rules, 2002 there was reservation in their favour to appear in the Pre-P “Examination. But, after framing of the new Rules in 2004, no such provisio was kept in their favour. Therefore, in the circumstances, in view of the Pre PG Rules, 2002, it was directed that all those candidates whohad completed two years rural service, they should be ‘ given weightage of 5% marks. As t e Pre-PG Examination of 2004 was of l ' Laiw’wu 1 WW 1U ~ m mm W anéw mam WWW ¢ 1v m ' %a$a:an%sr W Wm 200 marks, the State Government n view of the ordef dated 2I7/20D4 issued an order on 03/07/2004, whereby eighmge of 5% marks was given. It was not like that 5% marks were to be given oh each year'service to those d candidates who had sewed in t e rural area. But, it was directed that weighmge of 5% of total marks sh uid be given. As Pre-PG Examination 2004 was of 200 marks, therefo e, weightaue of 1O marks was given to those candidates who had compie d two years or more service in the rural area before appearing in the exam‘nation. Therefore. the ground raised by the petitioner has no force and the petition is liable to be dismissed and it ise hereby dismissed. In View of this order, M.W.P.l}lo.1905/2004 stands disposed of. Sdl— L.C.BHADG() r Judge so [new