IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12695 of 2010 BHUPI YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Mangal Pandit, A.P.P. -------------- 2 14.5.2010 Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution originally instituted for offences under sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner happens to be father-in-law of the deceased Pawo Devi. In the FIR vide annexure-1 the petitioner and others are named as accused. However, on close of investigation police submitted final report and petitioner was not charge sheeted. Learned Magistrate disagreed with the police report and took cognizance for offences under section 304 B , 201, 120 B ,34 of the Indian penal Code. It is submitted that other co-accused persons, with exactly similar and identical allegation, have been granted anticipatory bail by a Bench of this Court by order dated 9.2.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42281 of 2009 as contained in annexure-2. Taking into consideration the totality of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, the above named petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten - 2 - thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case no. 475 of 1993, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J. ) M.Rahman