IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.842 of 2007 GAYATRI DEVI wife of Suresh Prasad Singh, resident of village & P.O. Hansa Warisnagar, District Samastipur Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, Prabhat Kumar Pankaj, District Superintendent of Education, Samastipur 2. Md. Mukhtarul Jama, Headmaster, Middle School, Basudeopur B/C Kalyanpur, District Samastipur 3. Shailendra Natha Tripathi, District Provident Fund Officer, Samastipur 4. Anand Jha District Treasury Officer, Samastipur 5. Mritunjay Kumar Singh Officer in charge, Warisnagar Police Station, District Samastipur 6. Md. Sohab Akakhtar, Superintendent of Police, Samastipur 7. Dr. N. Sarwan Kumar, District Magistrate, Samastipur 8. G. Guha, the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna 9. Pankaj Jha The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, AMY, Mathurapur, Samastipur ----------- For the petitioner :Mr. Manish, Advocate 02/ 14.10.2009 From the cause shown by the authorities, it appears that petitioner has been paid compound interest on the arrears of salary with effect from the date of disappearance of her husband and on the retiral dues from the date of retirement. In the circumstances, cause shown by the authorities is accepted and the contempt application is disposed of. If the petitioner disputes the quantum of interest, she should approach the authorities by filing representation, which should be considered in accordance with law and if she is not satisfied with the order passed by the authorities, she should ventilate her grievance before the competent court of law. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)