IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13828 of 2005 RAJ BALI @ RAJBALI SINGH YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 04. 24.07.2008 Vide order dated 24.8.2004 based on the entry made in the service book of the petitioner he has been ordered to be retired on 31.8.2004. He is aggrieved now by the said order and has challenged the same in the present writ application. Contention of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is that in terms of annexure-2 which is school leaving certificate he has not reached the age of superannuation and based on this he also filed representation before the respondents on 25.9.2004. The question is whether annexure-2 was ever produced before the authorities and whether the petitioner at the time of entry to the service has produced any substantive material contrary to what had been recorded in the service book. If the authorities have passed an order retiring him according to the records available with them it is not open to the Court to refix his date of birth and correct the entries in the service book merely because he has produced a school leaving certificate before the Court in the writ application and that too when the order for retirement has come to be passed. The writ application is dismissed as being devoid of any merit. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)