.."<^ • J SINGLEBENCH / t^ \ y-3r-? /-' IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR IC.G} W.P. (SINO. 5^ W OF 2009 PETITIONER / ..^l^ ...•••'-c^^'\0.^ -sy- \^'"" VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ :1 Shreedhar Ram Baghel, aged about 48 years, S/o Shri Ram Singh Baghel, Peon, Mata Rukmani Aadivasi Kanya Aashram, Dhimarapal, Distt. Bastar(C.G-) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur (C.G.) The Secretary, Mata Ruknami Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tahsil & Distt. Bastar (C.G.) WRIT PETITfON UNDER ARTICLE 226^22^0F THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA ^" 2. 3. n^ ^^/ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETmON (8) No. 5980 of2009 PETmONER RESPONDENTS Shreedhar Ram Baghel. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB: H<m'ble Shri Satish K. Agnfliotri, J. Present: Shri Indrapal Sin^i, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Govermiient Adyocate for the State/respondents 1 and 2. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 22"°day ofOctober, 2009) Heard leamed counsel forthe parties. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the p^titioner sutaits that fhe instant petition is squarely covered by the decision ofthis Court rendered mSmt. A.Lall \\ State of Chhattisgarh & Other^, thus the petiticmer may be permitted to make a representation to decide his c^se in the li^it of aforestated decision, subjectto verifioation asto whether the respondent No. 3-Institute is a Govemment Aided school and tiie petitioner is a teacher within the sanctioned strength. 2. Leamed counsel appearing forthe State/respondents 1 and 2 submits tiaat m the event the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date ofreceipt ofthe representation. 3. In view of foregoing, according to fhe leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge 1 2007 (l)BLJ 265