spb/- 1 ca304-09.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CIVIIL APPLICATION NO. 304 OF 2009 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 24907 OF 2009 Madan Gangadhar Pitale ... Applicant. V/s. Jayawant Baburao Vagal & Ors. ... Respondents. --- Mr. Y.S.Bhate for the Applicant. Mr. N.D. Jaywant for the Respondents. ----- CORAM : D. G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 07th JANUARY, 2011. P.C. This civil application is filed for condonation of delay of more than five years in filing the civil revision application. The ground given for delay, in my view, is not at all satisfactory. It is alleged that the applicant was ill advised for not challenging the impugned order and therefore, he did not file revision application. The learned counsel for the respondent states that an incorrect advice was given by an Advocate not to challenge the impugned order. Name of the Advocate is not mentioned nor has he been made as a party to the petition. Only a vague allegation is made that on account of ill advice, the applicant did not file revision application without any details. In my view there is no ground for condonation of delay. The civil application is rejected. [D.G. KARNIK, J.]