IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2451 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2451 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2451 OF 2008 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2673 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2673 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2673 OF 2007 The Director of Income Tax .. Appellant V/s Patvolk Division of Forbes Gokak Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.Parag Vyas with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. None for Respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 25th September, 2008. DATE : 25th September, 2008. DATE : 25th September, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. None appears for the Respondent though served. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 88 days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay, and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)