IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9354 of 2006 MOST.CHANDIKA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Suman Kumar Mishra, Advocate. Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the State : Mr. A. Amanullah, G.A.-4 Mr. anuj Kumar, A.C. to G.A.-4 For the Accountant General : Mr. J.P. Karn, Sr. Advocate. 3 03.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State. A clear cut stand has been taken by the State, in its counter affidavit that the husband of the petitioner has been paid his pension and other retiral benefits on the revised pay scale and only the arrears of difference of salary and the revised scale are due, for which necessary order has been passed on 26.2.2007 and payment has also been paid to the petitioner. A Xerox copy of the revised authority of pension has also been handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner by learned counsel appearing for the Accountant General. No objection is raised on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. PN (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)