IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 11721 of 2007 Between: 1. D. Premamma W/o Vedanayakam r/o H. No. 29/236 Near Fire Station nandyala Town, Kurnool District. 2. V. Parvathamma W/o Jamvulaiah r/o H. No. 28/1675, R.S. Road Noonapalli, Nandyala town Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1. The Regional Manager, National Seeds Corporation Ltd., Lala Guda, Seducnerabad Hyderabad. 2. The Area Manager National Seeds Corporation ltd Nandyal O/o Noonapally, Nandyal, Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not permitting the petitioners to continue in service as daily wage worker as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14, 16, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioners to continue in service in the office of the 2nd respondent as daily wage employee and pass such other order or orders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.CHALLA.SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: DR.K.LAKSHMI NARASIMHA The Court made the following Order: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.11721 of 2007 ORDER: It is represented on either side that a connected writ petition in W.P.No.13939 of 2008, has been disposed of by this Court by an order dated 10-07-2008 in the following terms: “If the petitioners feel that they have been wrongfully retrenched from the service of the respondents, they have to approach the Labour Court. Not only the parties would be in a position to put forward their contentions, but also the evidence in support of the contentions would be recorded. Further, the powers of the Labour Court are fairly wide enough in the context of granting relief. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioners to approach the Labour Court for necessary relief. There shall be no order as to costs.” And they pray that the present writ petition may be disposed of on the same lines. Reiterating the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.13939 of 2008, dated 10-07-2008, the present writ petition stands dismissed on the same lines. No costs. Registry is directed to append a copy of the order in W.P.No.13939 of 2008, dated 10-07-2008, to this order, while dispatching. -------------------------------- Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J mrk 4th June 2009 ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRT}