IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-16159 of 2009 Date of decision : 1.7.2009 Roop Singh and others … Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr.Justice Augustine George Masih Present: Mr.H.S.Baath, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Aman Deep Singh Rai, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab Mr.Jatinder Singh, Advocate for the complainant. Augustine George Masih, J. (Oral) The present application was moved for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present application qua petitioner No.4, Sukhjeet Singh. Accordingly, the said application qua petitioner No.4 stands dismissed. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record of the case. Simple injury has been attributed to petitioner No.1, Roop Singh and petitioner No.2, Kattar Singh. No injury has been attributed to petitioner No.3, Nirmal Singh. This aspect has not been disputed by the learned State counsel nor learned counsel for the complainant. Learned State counsel further submits that petitioner Nos.1, 2 and 3 have joined the investigation and they are not required for further investigation. In view of the above, the ad interim bail granted vide order dated 10.6.2009 is made absolute. Petition stands disposed of. [ Augustine George Masih ] Judge 01.7.2009 sd