IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14102 of 2010 DAYANAND RAJBHAR & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 02.08.2010 Petitioner No. 1 is the husband, petitioner No. 2 is the father-in-law, petitioner No. 3 is the mother-in-law petitioner No. 4 is the elder brother and petitioner No. 5 is the Gotani and they all are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304B/201/34 of the I.P.C. Admittedly there was a demand and the death took place within seven years of the marriage, hence I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner No. 1 namely Dayanand Rajbhar(the husband). The application for anticipatory bail of petitioner No. 1 is rejected. So far as petitioner Nos. 2 to 5 are concerned, they are family members and during investigation it has come that the victim was under the treatment. More over the informant has retracted from his initial version as contained in Annexure-2. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner No. 2 Ramakant Rajbhar, petitioner No. 3 Samiya Devi @ Sanchi Devi, petitioner No. 4 Subhash Rajbhar, petitioner No. 5 Imlawati Devi, in the event of 2 their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Guthani P.S. Case No. 9 of 2008. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)