IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 818 OF 2010 SHRI. NITESH NARULKAR ... Petitioner Versus THE VILLAGE PANCHAYAT OF CHANDEL HASSAPUR, THROUGH ITS SARPANCH ... Respondent Mr. J. P. Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 6th January, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. Mulgoankar, learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the judgment and order dated 5th August, 2010 passed by the Deputy Director of Panchayat, North Goa, Panaji allowing the revision filed by respondent no.1 against the order dated 30th December, 2009 passed by Block Development Officer by which he allowed the appeal preferred by the petitioner challenging the order passed by the Panchayat refusing to issue N.O.C. to start liquor bar in the premises bearing No.90(3) at Chandel, Pernem. 3. This petition was filed on 27th September, 2010. 4. Before the matter could come up for admission, the Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 has been amended and Section 201(B) has brought into force with effect from 15th October, 2010 which provides for revision against any order passed by any authority, which includes the order passed by the Deputy Director of Panchayat. 5. In view of the above position, Mr. Mulgaonkar seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file the revision application before the District Court, North Goa at Panaji against the impugned judgment and order. Mr. Mulgaonkar states that he will file revision application within two weeks and since revision has to be filed within a period of 30 days, delay in filing revision application be condoned. 6. In view of the availability of remedy of revision against the impugned judgment and order, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file revision application in the District Court, North Goa at Panaji against the impugned judgment and order dated 5th August, 2010 subject to the petitioner filing revision application within two weeks. In case, the revision application is filed within two weeks, the District Court shall condone the delay and dispose of the revision application in accordance with law. Writ Petition stands disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA