IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 16725 of 2011 Date of Decision: 07.09.2011 Satinder Pal Singh and another ..Petitioners Versus Financial Commissioner and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr. U.K.Tanwar, Advocate, for the petitioners. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that petitioners have filed Revision on 21.06.2010 (Annexure P/6) before the Financial Commissioner (Irrigation), Punjab – respondent no.1, along with ad interim relief application (Annexure P/7), however till day, neither the application seeking interim relief has been decided nor revision is heard and decided, therefore, Financial Commissioner be directed to take decision in the revision (Annexure P/6) and decide the application (Annexure P/7), within such time as fixed by this Court. Without expressing any opinion on the merit as well as on the maintainability of the revision (Annexure P/6) and application (Annexure P/7) respondent No.1 is directed to decide the ad interim relief application (Annexure P/7) within 30 days and decide the revision (Annexure P/6) within six months from the date certified copy of this order is placed before him, in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of. (ALOK SINGH) JUDGE 07.09.2011 som