IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH w.P. No. 33 gé (2004 PETITION§W<§$2§W T. N. Pandey S/o Lats Parsuram Pandey aged about 62 years R/o é" a <§A%(c/k&o\§v\ r v Village— Bajha, (U,P.) Kanchanpur, Distt. — x “av $$ V‘\\" Xx 3%“ b.“ R§SPONDENTS VERSUS l. The State of Chhattisgarh. Through the Secretaly Depatment of irrigation Department 2. Chief Engineer Irrigation Department Hasdeo Bango Project Bilaspur 3. Accountant General (Account 8L Hakdari) Fafadeeh Bilaspur Road Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PITIOTION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA @M 2-2-2Gfl6 Shri Arun Kochar, counsei ft tsnrl Sandeep Duisey‘, Govt.‘ 5nr1,::3.K. Berlwal, counsei ft I‘ r-ward. By this petition, the petitinn er contends that fuii and fmai payment , of GPF has not been paiei. Return me Kuies ana Instructions the varieus steps to be taker? in penswn, gratuity, GH— and otne adhered, but that has not been drrne and the peiitiener’s Department as equany responsrbie. in View of the above, it is and aii efforts be made to settie ti' of three months from the date of The respondent concerned to do to render due cooperation to the a With the aforesaid observe dispesed of with iiioerty to file afre: Consequentiy, aii the pendi Certified copy as per ruies. directed that missing credits be traced e ciaim of the petitioner within a period 'eceipt/‘production of copy ofthis order. {he HEEUT ‘ Petitiot‘lef IS alSO Cili’eCteCi J‘l‘horlties. tionS'and directions the petition stands h 'in case any grievance stiii subststs. ng appiicatione stand disposed of. A /’lr em”- r )r the petitioner. fidvoeate for the State. tr respondent No.3. tae been fiied by respondent No.3 which prescribe‘the time schedule for regard to the payment of retirai dues, retirai benehts ought to have been Sdi- Fakhruddin Judge [new UL