^;' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) M. C. C. N0. SL^^ 2006 &°n|It' Applicants/ Appellants 1. ^ 2. 3. Smt. Deomaniya, aged about 35 years, R/o village- Belkhariya, P.S. Lakhanpur, Distt. Surguja . (Deed) Smt. Jai Kunwar Bai, aged about 32 years R/o village - Mendra kalo, P.S. Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja- (Deed) Smt. Sumitra Bai, aged about 29 years, R/o village Kasadohar, P.S. Ambikapur 6. years village- Kanthi, P.S. & Tahsil Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja- (Deed) Sukhnandan aged about 40 years, R/o village Katkalo, Tah. Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja- (All daughters and son oflate Jai Ram) Versus Non-applicants/ Respondents Baban Das aged about 40 years, (Deed) Ganesh Ram aged about 35 years, (Deed) (Both sons of Rajrup, R/o village- Katkalo Tah. Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja. Smt. Dev Kunwar widow of Nandlal aged about 55 years, R/o village Katkola, Tah. Ambikapur distt. Surguja. (Deed) Mohar Lal aged about 35 years S/o Jai Ram R/o Village - Katkola, Tah. Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja- •7. \^-' APPLICATION^FOR RESTORATION OF SECOND APPEAL N0^ 407/87 DISMISSED VIDE COURTS ORDER DATED 18-^2-05 PASSED BY HON'BLE MISHRA J AND THAT OF THE HON'BLE A.R. (J) ORDER DATED 11-05-2005 ~R': XI-HC-22 ^TT^T^T kyiicb 3n^r 9t)^ii<^ ^T^a ^—^ /' Gopai ^F^ '^TPTI^R, ^Tl1<l<l<o, fG)l<n|<lll< 3TT^T 'CRRF_ ^-CC^'^5^7 ^W<r\{ ^b^icb '^ 200 '^^ST' 'STT^T '^TT^R ^H Mr. B.P.Gupta, iearned oounse!|forthe a.ppjicants. Heardon M.(C.)P.No.789/2006,i fillng the restoration appiicatjon. Learned counsel for the applic^ 2005/ passed .by this Court in Second (Judicia!) dismissed the appeal'on 11' the above order, howeven the fact of' 22-4-2006; when the record of the oounse! cou!d not contact the appe!!an| ancf who is suffering from ajiment. A with the applicatjon for condonation of Taking into consideration the app!lcation for restoratlon, the app| M.(C.)P.No,789/2006, is aliowed and ttl Also heard on the apptication fot Takin-g' into consideratlon the appiication for restoration of the secoj the second appea! is restored to -its appjicants p8.y a sum of Rs.500/- (Ruj^ Court Legai sSen/ices Committee, Bi! today and file a receipt thereof. • In the li'ght of above order, .1.4. hearing, stands disposed of. <=ni^(<n^i 'RW^f ^ ft1cst <F^^s< ^ ^Tf^R ^3T^^^ i an appiicatjon fpr condGnation of delay In lic^nts submits that as per order dated 18-2- ^ppeal No;407/87, the Additiona! Registrar |5-2005 on account of no.n-compliance of ti|iedjsmissal oould be ascertained oniy on at^oye second appeal was Inspected. The Sukhnandan; who is 75 years old person tiedical certificate has also been annexed ^elay. • - ' ' . . .. .' reasons assigned for de)8.y in filing the ication for condonation of deiay, i.e^ |e delayis condoned. restoratjon ofthe second appeal. ^rounds taken by the applicants in their jicl appea!', the application is allowed and ori^jnal number, subject to conditjon thatthe }ees Five Hundred) to the Secretary, Hlgh ^spur within a period of one month from .No. 1541/2006, an appiication for urgent Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge T [^^fe^