IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2957 of 2007 BETWEEN: Sri Adapa Sitaramayya. ... PETITIONER AND Sri Byragi Matham. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. DAVULURI NARASIMH RAO Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. V.T.M. PRASAD The Court made the following: ORDER: The question raised in this revision is with regard to the executability of the decree in A.T.C.No.89 of 1991 obtained by the respondent against the petitioner. The respondent after the said order of eviction from the tenancy tribunal under the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Tenancy Act, has put the said decree in execution in E.P.No.10 of 2000. The petitioner herein objected to the execution proceedings based upon the amendment to the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 (for short ‘the A.P. Act 30 of 1987’) wherein sub-clause (5) was inserted in Section 82 vide A.P. Act 27 of 2002 with effect from 26.08.2002. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon a decision of this Court i n JALADI SEETHARAMAMMA v. RAMALINGESWARA SWAMI TEMPLE[1] to contend that all proceedings taken by the respondent – landlord are non est. 3. During the hearing, the learned counsel for the respondent/landlord submits that pending this revision petition, the respondent has taken appropriate proceedings for eviction of the petitioner under the A.P. Act 30 of 1987 and under the rules relevant to lease of agricultural land vide G.O.Ms.No.379 Revenue (Endo.I) dated 11.03.2003, the proceedings are initiated by issuing notice in Form-I under Rule 5(1) of the said rules. Learned counsel, therefore, states that the respondent has already taken up proceedings, as above. 4. Present execution proceedings before the Principal Junior Civil Judge are treated as non est by the respondent itself. In that view of the matter, the petitioner cannot have any grievance and he has to work out his remedies in the proceedings initiated by the respondent under the A.P. Act 30 of 1987. The civil revision petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J July 29, 2010 DSK [1] 2004 (6) ALD 739