IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 246 OF 2002 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2930 OF 2001 MUKUNDRAO R. BHAMRE & ORS. ..PETITIONERS V/S SATANA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS. ..RESPONDENTS S.S. KULKARNI FOR PETITIONERS. D.A. PATIL, AGP. S.P. THORAT FOR RESP. NO.2. V.V. SHETE FOR M/S. POORN KAMANI FOR RESP.NO.10. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 31-8-2006. P.C. Learned counsel for the Respondent No. 2 points out that the petitioners have not only made allegation of the breach of the order passed by the court but have also made allegations that Respondents have interfered with the administration of justice. In para No.5 on page No. 9 of the contempt petition the petitioner has alleged that the Respondent No. 1 by imposing tax and at the same time giving false information in the press release has interfered in the Administration of Justice. Thus the respondents are alleged to have not only committed civil contempt but also criminal contempt. Hence the matter be placed before the appropriate Division Bench. --- (D.G. KARNIK,J.)