IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P3No. H ‘63: §€r§¢=/200a— (SB) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER ' C Bhanu Pratap Jaiswal S/o Shri Dinanath Jaiswal, aged about 45 years, R/o Salkanavagaon Kota, Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisg Through Secretaly , Education 00 Q‘l p4 Department , D.K.S. Bhawan’ 3’ M 4; ((5)1 @ \$""$ Raipur (C.G.) e,“ g. Directbr of public Thg‘hh‘iiction , b. 4w Pensionbada Raipur CC.G.) Gv$xi HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (5) No. 1087 of 2007 Pei‘i'i’ioner 3 Bhanu Pru‘l'ap Jaiswal Versus Sm‘fe of Chha‘ffisgnrh c3: anofher ResponderWs Single Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Ju'S'rice Sa+ish K. Agnihoi‘r'i. \/ ! Mr. Kumaresh Tiwari, Advocate for the peTifiener. 5111?. Anju Ahuja, Depu‘fy $overnmen+ Advoca'i'a for ‘i'he Sfa're/respondenfs. ORDER (Passed on fhis 26“ Day of February, 2007) Learned counsei appearing for 'rhe pe‘i’i‘i’ioner- submifs fha'f fhe pe?i?ioner is working as Assismri't TeachzrfLecTurer‘. The pe‘fi'i'ioner ob‘fained B. Ed. Examinafion cer+ifica+e on 14-7-1992, on his own expenses. Leamed counsel appearing for ’rhe pefi'i'ioner submiis fha'i' 'i’he quesiion invoived, herein asio whe’iher 'l'he ‘i'eacher, who ob‘iained B. Ed. Examina‘iion Cer'i’i‘fica'i'e on his own expen$es is en'ri’iied 1'0 ‘rwo advance incremen‘i’s. Accoro'ing +0 learned counsei for The pei’i'rioner, The pefi'iioner is enfifled To Two advance incremenfs in view of ‘H‘ie decision of 'i'his Cour? in 'rhe coee of Yosnwon'i’ Kumar Bhoradwoj Vs. :‘viunicipal Corporo'i'ion, Burg and moi-her {2096 (II) MEIR-£6 96}. This Cour?- in 1'he case of Vashwan’i' Kumar Bharadwqi Vs. Municipai Corpora‘i’ion, Durg and ano'l'her (Supra), came 'i'o The conclusion 'i’hai' cine Teachers, who had obTained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examination CerTi‘ficaTe on Their own expenses, are covered by The circuiar da‘l’eé‘ 24.12.98 issued by fhe Sfa’i'e Governmen’r of Madhya Pradesh. ’ Learned counsel for The pe‘fi‘riorier‘ fur'i'her submifs fha‘l’ fhe fucks and quesfion 6f hw invoWed in ’rhe presenf case are squareiy covered by aecision of fhis Cour'f in me case of Yashwan‘i' Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Conpami’ion, Burg and anal-her (Supra), +0 which iearned counsei appearing for i'he respondenfs “fairiy concedes and agrees wi‘fh ”the avermen’i’ made by iearned counsel appearing for The pefiiioner. Accordingiy, fhe wri‘i’ pefifion is aHowed in Terms of f'ne order passed in fhe case of Vashwanf {umar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporal-ion, Eurg and anofher (Supra), subjecf fo verificafion of fhe facf as fo whe’rher fhe pefifioner has acquired B. Ed. Examinai’ion Cerfificafe, on his own expenses as per The circulars daTed 24.12.1998 é’< 1.3.1999 and furTher wheTher he has been paid Two advance incremenTs or noT. No order as To cosTs. {r Sdl— l Satish K.Agnihotr: l i Judge , Subhosh