\y^---" ''^'"..L^^;"^" ...- yi^kfS:o-"""° x^v^- Lti IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. \ ~3.-£S> /2010 Petitioner Versus Respondents 1. s' 2. Chhattisgarh Poultiy Dealers Association, a Society registered under the Society Registrikaran Adhiniyam, 1973, having its office at Telibandha Egg Market, Raipur, through its President Shri Rajendra Bramhankar, aged about 41 years, S/o Shri S. S. Bramhankar, R/o Jaishri Poultry Telibandha, Raipur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Departinent of Urban Develop^ient and Administration, D.K.S. Bhawan, TSiantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Municipal Corporation, Raipur, through its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT. ORDER OR DIRECTION TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. Defails of the pedtion. 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As per thecause title. ••::y, ' ^. ~>'^.^' . L y~ A. a:- ^.^hS^r^y'-'' PARTICULARS OFTHE RESPODNENTS: As per the cause title. ^.^^.&<v »;• ]; ?'-j) j •^y, "M^^. HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSOARH AT BILASRJR WMT PETmON fC) No. 1259 of2010 /^p PETmONER Poultry Dealera RE8PONDENTS CUhattisgMh Association. VERSU8 State ofChhattisgarii & Anotha-. Sll^Si If. WRIT PETTHON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INEaA SB: Hon'Uc Shri Sattsli K. AfignUiotri, J. Present: Shri Pradiant Jaiswd, Senior Advoeate wrth Shri Ajay MVira, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashaok Thakur, Paael Lawyer for Ifae State/respaiufent No.l. Shri H.B.Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate for the respoadent No.2. ORDEKfOKAL) (Passed on 01" day ofjuty, 2011) 1. This is a petitioa, fUed by Chhattisgaih Poultry' Deders Association without stating asto who are flie members ofthe said associarion. This Court, vide order dated 29.07.2010 (fe'ected Ae responderi/Corporation to keep seven shops vacaid; in the newly constructed buildmg at Jawahar Bazar MaAet, Raipur. 2. The contention of leamed eounsel for the petitieners 'tte some receipts have been aanexed to indieate the membeis of flie petiticner/association is without any basis as Ifaere no aveiments in the pleadings to conolusively establish that they are the persons 5. Shri Agrawal, leamed semar counsel wifli Shri Deshmukh, leamed coiinsel appearu^ for the respondent/ Coiporation suhmits Aat it is difBcult to respond to the pleadings far want of ^iedfic mmes of the allottees which has not been disclosed in the petition. However, if the aggrieved allottees make a represeiatation to the respondent/Corporation, the same shall be consiteed ia accordance with law, <m ite own merits and perspective. ]n view ofttie foregoing, nolhing aimves for adjudieatkm at das stage. Accordingly, wifh the aforesaid obsa-vati<m aad direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Satts^^•^Bl 3udSe ftotn