IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33829 of 2011 Between: Yalla Saraswathamma … Petitioner And Eastern Power Distribution Co., of A.P., Ltd., Operation Circle, Vizianagaram & another. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri D.V.N. Acharya Counsel for the respondents: Smt. Jyothi Eswar Gogineni This Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33829 of 2011 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the action of the respondents herein in erecting two electric poles bearing Nos.SS51/A1/1 and SS51/A/2 on the western side of the petitioner house property bearing H.No.18-4-1 admeasuring Ac.0.50 cents inSy.No.384 situated at Janashakti Colony, Belagam, Parvatipuram, Vizianagaram District without petitioner consent and authorization and after repeated representations and information sought under Right to Information Act, the 2nd respondent herein issuing Lr.No.AE/O/PVP(T)/F.Dock/D.No.179/11, dated 20.09.2011 and further Lr.No.AE/O/PVPT/F.RTI Act, D.No.218/11, dated 21.10.2011 asking the petitioner to furnish that the petitioner have to show correct location is arbitrary, illegal, violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the said proceedings directing the respondents herein to remove the said two electric poles from the petitioner’s land at respondents.” The petitioner has not come out with proper particulars of the suit filed by her which she comprehensively lost and also the appeal filed against the judgment and decree in the suit. The petitioner has failed to produce copies of these judgments without which the Writ Petition cannot be entertained. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh Writ Petition with proper pleadings and material. As a sequel, WPMP.No.42066 of 2011 is also dismissed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 22.12.2011 ES