IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5504 of 2010 BALIRAM MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR -- -----a---- 2 24.2.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 409 and 420 of the I.P.C. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner above named is in custody since 5.1.2010 and the entire case is based on documentary evidence which is already in custody of the investigating agency, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Sikrahana, East Champaran ( Motihari) in Pakri Dayal P.S. Case No.54/08 subject to the conditions that (a) one of the bailers will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (b) the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, (c) the bailer shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and 2 (d) the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. AnilKr.Sinha (Anjana Prakash,J.)