£«. INTHEHIGHCOURTOEJUDICATUREAtBILASFUR CHHATTISGARH ..-.^662-^- WRIT PETITION NO."""/ 2003. PETITIONER ^/ .*"^'i^"" t.^:^»»-(??•• r^'> RESPONDENTS Pramod Kumar Shanctilya Aged abouti45 years S^ Shri B.D..SBandilya , , ResidentofTahs:ildar'sqiiartBr,PpKce Lme,Beinetafa^@istt: Dui-g.(EG). VERSUS l.StateofChhatdsgarh ,' Through The Secretary pepartment-ofRevenue, P.K.S. Bhawan, Manfralaya, Raipur(CG) ^ ~ 2. TheCollectnr Durg,Distt: Durg (GG) 3. ShriSUarifMohammed Tahsildar, Kprba ' ' Distt: Koiba (CG) / WRITPETITIONIJNDERARTICLE22!6'&3270FTHE CONS'ITTIJTION OF INDIA rB;J l : BJiM XI-HC-22 M^iqil fti'ii.* sf^s s»*fi^N?^ 'ss?^i*it<'f<l,i»fftly'i?, Ri<twy WNCTI SBNIcn ^s^l^ 200 "Rre^sr' ao^i ?fttimgft<i 15/9/2003 Shri Shailendra Shukla for Shri Ranbir Singh, Govt tie eopy. By this wit petition undc}r of Mia, the petitioner seeks to| bv which he has ;been fransfeni to tehsil Antagarh districtKanker. | The petitioner s main to fi'equent fransfers. In last tmies. Qn 8/512001, (he p{ Farasgaon, thereafter vide order | Sfate of Madhya Pradesh and tvt> ftereafter on 24/9/2002 on Chhattisgarh he was posted as been transferred to tehsil Amas '<il<l[<'llR«)NI'jyf'ffft^<(«ssn^ ^? ^rf^CT^ ^tl^fl petitioner. Advocate, fbr tfae State (m advance Arricle 226/227 of Ae Constitution challenge Ae order dated 30/8/2Q03 d Nm tehsil Bemetra district gn^vance is Aat he has been subjected years, he has been transferred four ;titionsr was posled al sub-tehsil, dated 6/11/2001 he was allocated to TOS posted at tehsil Gadarwara and final allocation to the State of rehsildar-Bemetra, fromwhere he has vide the jmpugned order^,< :arh|vide the jmpui v XI-HC-22 a)^B'® 5P^Ti3i ^T^T T^°'w!nsm;-gwni<i'B, Ntwnwmw •^280 i*ri!iN«<<ftiR'«f8<l Leamed counsel for fte Ifae petitioner are studying at tequent Iransfer m the mid sess from Bemetra to Antagarh. impugned order alongwitii A^ S.R. Mahilang has also been Kanker whsreas tee is only (j Land Revenue Code Ae petitiij persons) have been posted on ons|)ps Having heard Ae leamt / ~ , regard io the facls and circums|lE to tfae fact ftat ihe petitiQner h^s his previous fransfer, morsove^ one post at tshsil Antagarh, 1he| reprcseirtation to respondeirt ho| all his grievances md difBcjulties Department of Revenue, will| T^ 1K 'WI^^.^te letitioner submits 4iat N children of' Bemefra and on account of &s loh fte children arcl to be transferred He fiirfier submits Aat vide Ae petitioner anote person namely I'aiisferred to tehsil Antagarh distact |ne post at Antagarh and contrary to (ner as well as S.R: Mahilang (two Ippst |d counsel for Ae parties, having |anees of Ihe case aad havmg rega |s been ttaasferred wilhin one year of two persons haw been posted on Ipetitioner is allowed to make a fresh wiAin a period of ten day raising Respondent no.l/Secretary, consider the represenfation of the ~-nUAMVl!4-.—'- XI-HC-22 ^itow ft^PMl '^q^ilgtTg'a 'gw^fl)^ws,»?Bfl<i<E,&'wffly Jya<* llftWII WBTfeB' 2BO iSl^lgWNttlftd matner fllfc ijito Ae pgtitioner in an ;objectiye period of Nrty days, fi-om reasoned order after laking iji raised by fte petitioner. Till petitioner should not be relievep Aepost, Wiffi the aforesaid observalii In view of the abovl No.8561/03 standdisposedof. wotwB1') ww<?fl1W><ftHsii fl?a8w<^s and decide ffie same within a receipt of Ae rqn-esentation, by a consideration all Ae grieyances decision on tfae representafion, flie , if he is not alreadv relieved fro ons, ftis petition is disposed of. . M.W.P. No.2618/03 and I.A. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo ~ Judge [41iW m