IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 35174 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 25.01.2010 Sheetal Kaur ........ petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Navjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent Mr. Satnam Singh Gill, Advocate for the complainant -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) CRM No. 3802 of 2010 Application is allowed and the order dated 16.01.2010 (P-11) and Medical Certificate (P-12) are taken on record. Main case Reply has been filed by the State. The same is taken on record. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents do not dispute that the petitioner has since appeared before the trial Court and has been enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge January 25, 2010 mohan