Civil Revision No. 4123 of 2011 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 4123 of 2011 Date of Decision: 11.7.2011 Deep Beant …Petitioner Versus Parveen Kumar …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) This revision petition assails the order of closing the evidence of the plaintiff-petitioner, passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Khanna, dated 26.5.2011. It is because, in 15 effective opportunities, she has not been able to lead her evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner/plaintiff and Ramesh Kumar have already tendered their affidavits and were to be cross-examined on the date fixed. He further submits that for summoning Tehsildar, Khanna and Clerk from the Improvement Trust, process fee and diet money was already deposited but the trial Court, taking the delay in conclusion of the proceedings, has closed evidence of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that on the next date of hearing, plaintiff/petitioner herself and Ramesh Kumar, at the risk and responsibility of the petitioner/plaintiff, shall Civil Revision No. 4123 of 2011 2 appear in the trial Court to facilitate their cross-examination. Learned counsel further submits that in case the trial Court takes effective steps for ensuring presence of the Tehsildar, Khanna and Clerk from the Improvement Trust, the petitioner/plaintiff will not lead any other evidence and herself will close the evidence. Learned counsel further submits that she will compensate the defendant for the delay caused in culmination of the proceedings. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff, the present revision petition is disposed of by directing the trial Court to conclude the cross-examination of petitioner/plaintiff and Ramesh Kumar on the next date fixed and thereafter shall take effective steps for ensuring the presence of the Tehsildar, Khanna and Clerk from the Improvement Trust, who shall be examined on one date. The petitioner is fastened with the cost of ` 5,000. On the payment of cost, further proceedings shall be carried out by the trial Court. With the observations made above, the present petition is disposed of. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge July 11, 2011 “DK”