IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 8429 of 2008. Decided on: 07.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Aradhana Sharma. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the only surviving relief in the present petition is that the petitioner has not been paid the salary for vacation period. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to pay and release to the petitioner salary for the vacation period in view of the principles laid down by this Court in CWP No.415 of 2000, titled Baldev Singh and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 1.9.2008, within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - judgment by the petitioner. The pending application(s), if any also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 07, 2010. (sck).