IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18672 of 2011 1. Devanand Kumar S/O Sri Bangali Ray R/O Village- Rampur Shyamchand, P.S.- Raghopur, District- Vaishali At Hajipur 2. Ankush Ray S/O Jai Krishna Prasad R/O Mohanpur, P.S.- Raghopur, District- Vaishali At Hajipur 3. Sanjay Kumar S/O Dayanand Roy R/O Village- Rampur Shyamchand, P.S.- Raghopur, District- Vaishali At Hajipur 4. Shardanand Roy S/O Laxuman Roy R/O Mohanpur, P.S.- Raghopur, District- Vaishali 5. Subodh Kumar S/O Prem Kumar Rai R/O Rampur Shyamchand, P.S.- Raghopur, District- Vaishali At Hajipur Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna 3. The Chairman Central Recruitment Board-Cum- Inspector General, S.C.R.B., Bihar, Patna 4. The Chairman, Central Region Board, B.M.P.-5, Patna 5. The Chairman Constable Selection Board, Saran At Chapra 6. The Chairman, Central Region Board, Bihar Police, Patna ----------- For the Petitioner:- Mr. Krishna Ranjan, Adv. For the State:- Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Adv. For the C.S.B.C.:- Mr. Binod Kr. Mishra, Adv. -------------- 2. 21.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.C. to A.A.G. 4 for respondents no. 1 and 2 and learned counsel for respondents no. 3 to 6. The petitioners have moved this Court for a direction to the respondents to consider their cases for appointment in light of order dated 28.6.2011 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in L.P.A. No. 831 of 2009 and its analogous cases. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners are similarly situated on facts to the 2 persons who were party in the said L.P.A. No. 831 of 2009 and its analogous cases. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents on the other hand submits that there are insufficient materials on record to indicate whether the petitioners are similarly situated to such persons or not. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and also the fact that there is categorical statement in paragraph no. 4 with regard to the petitioners applying to participate in advertisement no. 1 of 2004, 2 of 2004 and 3 of 2004, the present writ application is also disposed off in terms of the order passed in L.P.A. No. 831 of 2009 and its analogous cases. The respondents shall also undertake the exercise in the case of the petitioner as directed by this Court in L.P.A. No. 831 of 2009, subject to the rider that they shall first verify and satisfy themselves on facts that the petitioners in the present writ application are similarly situated to the persons involved in L.P.A. No. 831 of 2009 and its analogous cases. With the aforementioned observations and directions the writ petition stands disposed off. Anand Kr. ( Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)