IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6703 of 2009 SHRAVAN KUMAR, SON OF INDRADEO PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-ALAUDIA SARAI, P.O. TIURI, P.S. MANPUR, DISTRICT- NALANDA AT BIHAR SHARIF ……….. PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna 3. The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Chairman, Nalaqnda District Board, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif. 5. The District Education Officer, Nalanda-cum-the Member Secretary of Panel Preparation Committee, District Board, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif …………… …………. Respondents. ----------- 2. 30.06.2009 Petitioner has filed this application for directing the respondent-authorities to consider his case for appointment as assistant teacher in English subject. His grievance is that persons having lesser marks, have been appointed and his case has not been considered. I find that Bihar Zila Parishad, secondary and higher secondary teachers appointments and service conditions rule, 2006 provides for an appeal in such matters where the candidates have any complaint regarding appointment under provisions of this rule. Rule 15 relates to an appeal and that appeal is to be heard and decided by a District Level Tribunal. The tribunal exists and there is remedy for filing an appeal which has not been exhausted by the petitioner. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the tribunal. In case such an appeal is filed by the petitioner, it must 2 be decided in accordance with law giving reasoning in support of the decision of the tribunal. The appeal must be decided within three months from the date of filing such an appeal. akv/ ( Mridula Mishra, J )