C6: 1%; ‘ 5 L) IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF C&HATTISGARH AT BILASPUR i i w. P. s. No. 3 %g OF 2009 $m§gg @“ch / J.S. Thakur son of 1at:e Hari Singh Thakur , ag€d about—51 years, Assistant Grade-2 in office of Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Raigrh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. ’étate of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, ‘ Tribal Welfare ‘ 85 Development 1 Department , D.K.S. Bhavan,‘ Raipur I WggG.) 2. Commissioner , Triba Development Department, Raipur (C.G.) Welfare 8L ' K 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare 85 Development Department, Raigarh Distt. ,lxRaigarh (C.G.). 4. Collector, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF‘ THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA l . w'.C$) hug/{FL 260/3 mam (Wu) Kmwm mm wmn $Wm { “SB HGK’BLE $HQI JEE$TECE P’EITINTKE‘R 3IW£KER f 24.01296? Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha, :ounsel fc-r the petitioner‘ Shri Arvind Dubey, PL. {03" the State‘ Challenge in the presert petition is to the crder (iated 306.2009 passed by respondent No.71 by which the petitioner who is working aS AG—II has been trarsferred from the office 76f Assistant Commisstener, Tribal Development Department, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh to the office of Assistan‘ Commissioner, Tribal Deve‘iopment Depattment, Korba, District Korba. i e )etitioner is that he is wo‘rki Assistant Grade H and the iority of the petitioner is maintained district wise and if he wih be compeiEed to go on his transfer piece, his seniority Wi‘i‘; e adverseiv affected. ‘ Contention of counsel fo: the State is that iet the petitioner make a representation to the res ondent No. 1 and the same wouid be decided in accordance with law. Counsel for the petitio agrees to make a representation. g, However he submits that tiii ’ petitioner may be given some p Accordingly, the petition is representation is decided, the ctive order. disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a repfesentat on Within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order, the sanie would he decided Within a period of three eeks from the d te o‘ its leceiot Till then the impugned order sha‘ii be given effect toi Sd/- Pritinker ‘Eiwaker ' ‘ ‘Judge Contention of counsei for h n sn n . h r i‘ e ' ’ t n