S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.3223/2006 Date : 01.08.2006 HON'BLE MR. SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. D.S. Dev for the applicant. Mr. V.R. Mehta, Public Prosecutor for State. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order and the case diary. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that injuries on the person of the injured are simple in nature and he is in custody since long. A perusal of the case diary reveals that injuries on the person of the injured are grievous in nature. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, I do not find it to be a fit case to extend benefit of bail to the applicant. Accordingly, the bail application moved under by the applicant under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is rejected. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. vijayant