90 S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. INTERIM BAIL APPLICATION NO. 6133/2009. Devi Singh @ Debu Singh Vs. The State of Rajasthan Date of Order :: 24th November 2009. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. Devendra Mahalana, for the petitioner. Mr. M.A. Bhurat, Public Prosecutor. ... BY THE COURT: The petitioner, accused of offences under Sections 302, 364, 323, 341, 147, 148, 149 IPC, moved an application for temporary bail on the ground that the marriage of the son of his elder uncle is to be solemnised on 27th inst. The prayer so made by the petitioner has been declined by the learned Trial Court and hence, the petitioner has moved this application for temporary bail. This Court is clearly of opinion that the proposition of granting temporary bail could be taken up for consideration in suitable rare cases of extreme hardship or compelling circumstances where not granting of temporary bail might cause serious prejudice. Such an indulgence by the Court is never intended to be used as a substitute and another method of securing release on one pretext or another. The reason as stated in the present case, i.e., the marriage of the son of the elder uncle of the petitioner, in the opinion of this Court, cannot be considered to be a circumstance having even a remote justification for grant of temporary bail. This application for temporary bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. moved on behalf of the petitioner Devi Singh @ Debu Singh S/o Sant Kumar Singh @ Santosh Singh stands rejected. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. /Mohan/