CRM-M No.29907 of 2011(O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.29907 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 04.10.2011 Suman ...... Petitioner v. State of Haryana ...... Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Ashok Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Man Mohan Sikka, D.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Akashdeep Singh, Advocate for the complainant. *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case F.I.R. No.265 dated 11.08.2009 registered under Sections 498-A, 307, 34 IPC and lateron challan submitted under Sections 304-B, 498-A and 34 IPC at Police Station Kundli, District Sonepat. On 03.10.2011 the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel has argued that the petitioner is the wife of the separated brother who was originally found innocent and has now been CRM-M No.29907 of 2011(O&M) ::2:: summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. and that a petition for challenging the summoning order bearing CRR No.1044 of 2011 is fixed for tomorrow i.e. 04.10.2011.” Learned Deputy Advocate General on instructions from ASI Kuldeep Singh as well as learned counsel for the complainant have accepted these factual assertions. However, it has been argued that the petitioner was named in the dying declaration and they also denied that the petitioner is the wife of the separated brother. Be that as it may, in view of the fact that the petitioner was originally placed in column no.2 and the fact that she is a lady, I do not deem it appropriate to deny her the concession of bail. Let the petitioner appear before the learned trial Court on the next date of hearing who shall release her on bail to its satisfaction subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) October 04, 2011 JUDGE ashish