HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR No.3720 of 2008 Date Of Decision: 23.09.2009 **** Surinder Singh . . . . Petitioner VS. Tirath Singh and others . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Amrik Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.C. Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. V.S. Rana, Advocate for the respondent ***** SURYA KANT J. This revision petition is at the instance of the petitioner- plaintiff whose application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC to restrain the respondents-defendants from raising any type of construction over the suit property, was dismissed by the Civil Court, Kharar vide its order dated 01.08.2007, which order has been further upheld by the Ld. Additional District Judge, Ropar vide the impugned judgement dated 14.05.2008. I have heard learned counsel for the parties at some length and perused the record. Learned Counsel for respondent No.1 and 2 undertakes that in case the specific portion of the property in dispute where they have raised or might raise construction, falls, to the share of the petitioner, they shall remove the same without claiming any compensation or damages from the petitioner-plaintiff. Similar condition shall apply to the petitioner-plaintiff also as agreed to by his counsel. In view of the undertaking given by counsel for the parties, this revision petition is disposed of. Dasti. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE September 23, 2009 shonkar