[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.3622 OF 2008 Mr.Samir Kapadia ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.C.V.Golwala i/b Mr.Vishal Deshmukh advocate for applicant Mr.Prashant Parsurampuri Adv. for Respondent no.2 Mr.S.R.Shidne A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : OCTOBER 13, 2008 DATE : OCTOBER 13, 2008 DATE : OCTOBER 13, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant-original respondent no.7, learned advocate for the respondent no.2-original applicant who has preferred application under sections 145 and 146 of Cr.P.C., and the learned APP for the State. 2. In the above mentioned application, the learned Magistrate by order dated 15.7.2008 directed that the property in question be attached for maintaining law and order between the two [-2-] societies. Being aggrieved by the said order, this application has been preferred. 3. The matter has now been kept on 10.11.2008. It is seen that the impugned order is an interim order passed in the proceedings. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the said order at this stage. In my view, purpose of justice would be served if the proceedings relating to proceedings under Sections 145 and 146 of Cr.P.C. are expedited. Hence, the said proceedings are expedited. All the contentions of both the parties are left open. 4. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]