1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No. 2254 OF 2009 Haji Maqbool Hasan Khan and ors ..Petitioners. vs. State of Maharashtra and ors..Respondents. Mr Subhash Zha i/b Law Global, Advocates for the Petitioners. Dr F. R. Shaikh, A.P.P.,for the State. CORAM: BILAL NAZKI AND A.R.JOSHI,JJ DATED : 7TH SEPTEMBER,2009 P.C.:- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners at length. Perused the writ petition. This writ petition has been filed challenging the investigation in crime No.76 of 2009 registered at J.J. Marg Police Station, Byculla, Mumbai and ordering an investigation afresh on the ground that the petitioners had produced witnesses before agency which suggest commission of offence by some of the persons who were not arrayed as accused in the case. The learned counsel for the petitioners has argued in detail on the basis of statements made to the police by some of the witnesses on the basis of letters written by the complainant to various authorities and on the basis of some press reports. The Code of Criminal Procedure is a complete Code which lays 2 down the methodology for inquiry, investigation and trial. This Court is not expected to act as a super investigating agency. The police may investigate a case properly, may also not investigate a case properly. In both cases, the Magistrate and the Sessions Judge are empowered to pass appropriate orders. If the Sessions Judge finds that the report filed by the police does not disclose all that was investigated by the I.O., the court has power to call for a supplementary charge sheet even at the stage of recording of evidence by the court. If the court feels that certain offenders have been left out, court has ample powers to array those persons as accused even during the trial. We, at this stage, on the basis of some statements having been made by the interested persons cannot come to the conclusion as to who was involved in the case and who was not. Writ petition is misconceived, deserves to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. (BILAL NAZKI,J) (A.R.JOSHI,J)