BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Thirtieth day of June Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.S.RAMANATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.7698 of 2011 CHANDRALEKHA ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED -6 (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs. STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ATHOOR POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. ( CRIME NO.164 OF 2011 ) ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V. NATARAJAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 341, 302 of IPC altered into 120(b), 341 and 302 of IPC in Crime No.164 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence seeks anticipatory bail. 2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the sister of A-1 and she has been falsely implicated and even according to the prosecution, A-1 to A-5 alleged to have committed the murder on 12.06.2011 and A-1 to A-5 are in custody. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the brother of the petitioner was murdered and therefore, the petitioner has taken a vow to kill the murderer before the First Anniversary of her brother's death and the other accused promised the petitioner to fulfill her vow and in that, the petitioner also agreed to give the expenses and she was giving information about the movements of the deceased and the deceased was murdered by other accused and she was the member of the conspiracy and therefore, she has been arrayed as an accused. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Heard Mr.V.Natarajan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.Ramar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioner was included on the ground that she was a member of the conspiracy and having regard to the fact that the petitioner's brother was already murdered and she was not found at the scene of occurrence and the murder was committed by the other accused and they are in custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchendur and on each of them executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 30/06/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUCHENDUR. 2 -Do-Thro' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TUTICORIN. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ATHOOR POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S. V. NATARAJAN Advocate SR.No.20950 akm/01.07.11 /2p-6c/ ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.7698 of 2011 Date :30/06/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/