1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Second Bail Application No. 8011/2010 Raju @ Rujmal Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 27.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Harendra Singh - for petitioner Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is behind bars for last six months. Second bail application has been moved. It is a case of bail jump. Petitioner has already suffered on that account by remaining behind bars for six months. Petitioner will attend the trial court regularly if bail is granted. Looking to the aforesaid, petitioner may be granted bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this 2 case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and it is directed that accused-petitioner namely; Raju @ Rujmal may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 127/2004 registered at Police Station – Sikari, Bharatpur for offence under Section/s 332, 353, 307 IPC provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. It is, however, made clear that if petitioner fails to attend the trial court on any future date of hearing, this bail order would come to an end automatically without further reference to this court. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma