BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.15971 of 2011 1. ESKALIN 2. ROMAS : PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 & 2 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PANAKUDI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.495/2011 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.KATHIRVELU, Senior Counsel for Mr.S.RAGAVENTHRE Advocate For Respondent : Mr. C.RAMESH Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 120(b), 470, 465 and 420 IPC in Crime No.495 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and seek anticipatory bail. 2. Mr.V.Kathirvelu, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the the petitioners have been arrayed as A-1 and A-2 and they have been implicated in this case on the allegation that they are said to have collected ration cards and photos from several persons for getting loan from the nationalised banks. But they have obtained loan in the name of the de-facto complainant and thereby cheated the de-facto complainant. He further submitted that the alleged transaction is said to have taken place in year 2008. He further submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners have been implicated in this case on the allegation that they are said to have collected ration cards and photos from several persons for getting loan from the nationalised banks. But they have https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ obtained loan in the name of the de-facto complainant and thereby cheated the de-facto complainant and the alleged transaction is said to have taken place in year 2008. He further submitted that the investigation is pending. 4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 5. It is seen that the petitioners have been arrayed as A-1 and A-2 and they have been implicated in this case on the allegation as stated above. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the alleged occurrence is said to have taken place in the year 2008, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners being ladies they shall appear before the respondent police as and when for interrogation. Sd/- 19/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VALLIYOOR. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PANAKUDI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. S.RAGAVENTHRE Advocate SR.No.44569 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15971 of 2011 Date :19/12/2011 NSV/21.12.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/