IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 6824 of 2005 Between: Shaik Chand, S/o. Abdul Raheem, Muslim, Resident of H.No. 5-142, Behind Police Station, Jadcherla, Mahaboobnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Andhra Pradesh Industrial, Infrastructure Corporation Limited, Represented by its General Manager, Having its registered office at Parishram Bhavan, VI Floor, H.No. 5-9-58/B, Fathemaidan Road, Hyderabad. 2 Andhra Pradesh Industrial, Infrastructure Corporation Limited, Jadcherla, Represented by its Zonal Manager. 3 K. Raghunandan, S/o. Narayana, Hindu, R/o. Kalwakurthy Village & Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District. 4 G. Yadaiah, S/o. Pentaiah, Hindu, R/o. H.No. 1-52/1, Badepalli Village, Jadcherla Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District. 5 G. Janardhan Reddy, S/o. Ram Reddy, Hindu, R/o. H.No. MIG 88, Housing Board Colony, Jadcherla Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, one particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in cancelling the plot No. 19/A, allotted to Respondent No.3 and resuming the said plot and to direct the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to cancel the allotment of Plot No.19/A, Industrial Estate, Jadcharla, to resume the same from Respondent No. 3 and allot the said plot to the petitioner and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.SOMESWARA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: MR.E.MADAN MOHAN RAO The Court at the admission stage made the following O R D E R: The petitioner seeks a direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to cancel the allotment of plot No.19/A, Industrial Estate, Jadcharla, to respondent No.3, resume the said plot and allot the same to him. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the petitioner. It is for the respondents to take action in accordance with law. The petitioner has no right to challenge the action of respondents 1 and 2 since his rights are not affected in any manner. Hence, the writ petition is totally devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed at the admission stage. No costs. _______________ (K.C.BHANU,J) Dt:30th March, 2005 usd To 1. The General Manager, Andhra Pradesh Industrial, Infrastructure Corporation Limited, office at Parishram Bhavan, VI Floor, H.No. 5-9- 58/B, Fathemaidan Road, Hyderabad. 2. The Zonal Manager, Andhra Pradesh Industrial, Infrastructure Corporation Limited, Jadcherla. 3 Two CD copies.