IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 21907 of 1994 Between: B. Sambaiah alias B. Sambasivudu, S/o Late Kurma Jangaiah, Maheshwaram (V) & (M), Ranga Reddy Dist ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Maheshwaram, Ranga Reddy Dist. 2 Mirza Nasr Baig, 3 Mirza Dawood Baig, 4 Mirza Naseer Baig, 5 Mirza Basith Baig, 6 Mirza Akbar Ali Baig, 7 Smt. Asmat Fatima, 8 Kumari Hashmath Fatima, 9 Kumari Nikhal Fatima, 10 Smt. Hayatunnissa Begum alias Raheem Sultana, 11 Shaik Md. Asrari, Respondents 2 to 10 are residents of Maheswaram village and and mandal, Ranga Reddy district. Respondent No.11 is resident of 18-11-31/1/1/A, Jamal Banda, Farooq Colony Barkas, Hyderabad. Respondent no.11 is G.P.A. holder to Respondents 2 to 10. 12. Ilaiah alias Yadagiri and Yadaiah, s/o.Balaiah. 13.Darshan, s/o.Ilaiah 14.Danamma, w/o.Ilaiah 15.Balraj, s/o.Bavaiah. 16. Suresh, s/o.Bavaiah 17. The Station House Officer, Maheswaram mandal, Ranga Reddy district. Respondents 12 to 16 are residents of Maheswaram village & mandal,. Respondents 12 to 17 are added as per Court order dated 25.7.1995 in W.P.M.P.No. 3465 of 1995. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to pass an order or orders particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the Mandal Revenue Officer in refusing to grant injunction order in respect of land bearing Survey.No.379, 381, 382, 383, 371, 372, 349, 350, 361, 377 and 362 all situated at village & Mandal Maheshwaram, R.R.Dist., as bad, illegal, and contrary to the provisions of section 32 of A.P. (T.A) Tenancy And Agricultural Lands Act and further direct the Mandal Revenue Officer to implement the High Court order as decide and reported in Andhra Law Journal 1988(1) P. 524. Counsel for thePetitioner: MR.KESHAV HULSURKAR (not present). Counsel for theRespondentNo.1: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 to 11: Mr. T.S.Praveen Kumar. The Court made the following : O R D E R : When the matter came up for hearing on 9.7.2004, none appeared. Even today when the matter came up for hearing, none appeared and there is no representation. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs. --------------------------- 16.07.2004 Copy to: 1)The Mandal Revenue Officer, Maheswaram, Rangareddy dist. 2)Two CCs to the G.P.for Revenue, High Court buildings, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (o.u.t.) 3)Two CD copies. 4)The S.H.O., Maheswaram mandal, Ranga Reddy district. Hsd/Drk