IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2009 / 24TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 16766 of 2009(M) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: -------------------- 1. UNNIKRISHNAN V.S. LINE MAN -GR-1, KSEB, ELECTRICAL SECTION, NJARACKAL, ERNAKULAM. 2. K.S. PRADEEP. LINE MAN-GR.I, KSEB ELECTRICAL SECTION, NJARACKAL, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN SRI.M.K.FAISAL SRI.K.S.RAJESH SRI.P.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (HRM), KSEB VYDHUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, KSEB ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE ASST. EXE. ENGINEER, KSEB ELECTRICAL DIVISION, MATTANCHERY. 4. THE ASST. ENGINEER, KSEB ELECTRICAL SECTION NJARACKAL. R1 TO 4 BY ADV. SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB SRI. ASOK M.CHERIYAN, SC, KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: app/- WP(C).No. 16766 of 2009(M) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: P1 : COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 23.4.2009 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONERS. P2 : COPY OF THE MEMO OF CHARGES DATED 25.5.2009. P3 : COPY OF THE EXPLANATION DATED 8.6.2009 P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 6.6.2009. P5 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 9.6.2009. P5(A): COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 9.6.2009 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : R3(A) : COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE COMPLAINT REGISTER. R3(B) : COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT. R3(C) : COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF THE SUB ENGINEER. R3(D) : COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF THE 1ST PETITIONER. R3(E) : COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF THE 2ND PETITIONER. R3(F) : COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 23.4.2009 R3(G) : COPY OF THE ENQUIRY REPORT. R3(H) : COPY OF THE CIRCULAR DATED 30.7.2005 R3(I) : COPY OF THE RELIEVING MEMO DATED 8.6.2009 ISSUED TO THE 1ST PETITIONER. R3(J) : COPY OF THE RELIEVING MEMO DATED 8.6.2009 ISSUED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER. // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE. S. SIRI JAGAN, J ============ WP(C) No.16766/2009 =============== Dated this the 15th day of July 2009. J U D G M E N T =========== The petitioners are challenging orders transferring them. Originally there was a stay against the transfer. Subsequently after the respondents filed counter affidavit, the stay was vacated. Now petitioners submit that their representation Ext.P5 and P5(a) may be directed to be disposed of. 2. I have heard both sides. 3. As requested by the petitioners, I dispose of the writ petition with the following directions:- i) The 1st respondent shall consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 filed by the 1st petitioner as expeditiously as possible at any rate within 1 month from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. WP(C) No.16766/2009 2 ii) 4th respondent should forward Ext.P5(a) representation filed by the 2nd petitioner to the 1st respondent, within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, who shall consider and pass orders an the same as expeditiously as possible at any rate within 1 month from the date of receipt of the Ext.P5(a) from the 4th respondent. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE app/-