THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO Dated: 11th February 2010 C.R.P.No.247 of 2010 Between: Mr.Pillutla Veera Bhadraiah and ors …Petitioners And Smt Eedra Rajani Kumari and ors …Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No.247 of 2010 O R D E R: Heard the learned counsel and at their request the revision is taken up for disposal. The petitioners herein are the plaintiffs, who filed this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking to assail the correctness of the order dismissing an application where under they wanted to summon the neighbour as a witness on their behalf. Considering the submissions on both sides and on perusal of the record, it is seen that admittedly the trial was completed on 17-3-2009 itself as observed by the Court below, and thereafter, now the present application is filed. The Court below after taking into consideration though various other circumstances, which are not necessary, did not find in favour of the petitioners and dismissed the petition on the ground that the petition is filed belatedly after the evidence, was completed. It is also apparent from the order impugned that the said idea to summon the neighbour is quite belated and certainly a neighbour could not have been lost sight for the purpose of examination as a witness and no other reason has been assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the present application as to why the said neighbour could not possibly examined. In the absence of any such foundation properly laid, I do not find any ground to interfere with the order of the Court below. The revision is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _______________ B.PRAKASH RAO,J 11th February 2010 grk THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No.247 of 2010 Dated: 11th February 2010