1 1735.11- wp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1735 OF 2011 Shramik Mandal & Anr. ... Petitioners. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents. N.V.Bandiwadekar for the petitioners. S.N.Bhosale, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mandar Limaye for respondent No.3. CORAM : R.V.MORE, J. DATED : 11th April 2011. P.C. : Heard Shri Bandiwadekar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Bhosale, learned A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Shri Limaye, learned counsel for respondent No.3. 2. By the impugned order, the Education Officer was pleased to revoke an approval granted to the petitioner No.2 as Full-time Teacher and directed to appoint respondent No.3 as part-time teacher. Perusal of the impugned order makes it clear that there are no reasons whatsoever given by the Education Officer in support of the said order. On that ground alone, the impugned order deserves to be quashed and set aside. In the circumstances, I dispose of this petition by passing following order: sanjay 2 1735.11- wp ORDER The impugned order dated 24th January, 2011 is quashed and set aside and the matter is remitted back to respondent No.2 with direction to take fresh decision on merits. The respondent No.2 shall pass a reasoned order on the representation made by respondent No.3 after granting an opportunity of hearing to all parties. Needless to mention that respondent No.2 shall decide the said representation as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. All the concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (R.V.MORE, J.)