IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2151 OF 2005 IN APPEAL (LDG.) NO.675 OF 2005 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1584 OF 2003 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.17 OF 1989 IN DECREE DATED 18.3.1986 IN AWARD NO.75 OF 1984 Dilip Anand & Anr. ....Appellants V/s. Pradeep Anand & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.Snehal Shah i/b Narayanan & Narayanan for the Appellant. Mr.R.J. Majra i/b Mr.M.G. Gawde for the Respondents. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2006. P.C. : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and the Respondents. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay of 62 days. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bona-fide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)