IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5773 of 2010 RAMADHAR MAHTO, S/O LATE LAKHAN MAHTO, R/O VILLAGE-MADAPUR CHHAPRA, P.S.-PUSA, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR. ……………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. ……………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 2 26.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case is under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and he has been implicated in this case on the basis of alleged confessional statement of other co-accused. He submits that the petitioner is in custody since 16.06.2009 and he has not been put on T.I.P. and he has no criminal antecedent. Considering the above submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, this application is allowed. Let petitioner Ramadhar Mahto be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Patepur P.S. Case No.54 of 2002 with conditions as laid down in Sub-Section (3) 2 of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)