IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35739 of 2008 SURESH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.09.2008 Heard. The case is under Sections 379 and 411 IPC with regard to an occurrence of theft of informant’s pumping set. The F.I.R. indicates that the petitioner had told the informant that he would get the pumping set searched, but he subsequently did not do so and started threatening the informant. From the impugned bail rejection order of the learned Sessions Judge, it appears that on the statement of the petitioner as made before the Police, the stolen pumping set was recovered from the possession of one Sato Yadav. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Sato Yadav has been allowed bail by a Bench of this Court. He further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 2nd April 2008. Under the circumstances, I do not feel inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. Prayer for bail is r ejected. However, if so advised, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after three months. Jay/ (C.M.Prasad,J)