- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.279 OF 2005 IN F.C.A.ST.NO.29313 OF 2005 Shri.Dilip Ramchandra Salunkhe ..Applicant Vs. Kum.Apoorva Dilip Salunkhe and Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr. D.P.ADsule Advocate for Applicant ... CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 23,2005 DATE : DECEMBER 23,2005 DATE : DECEMBER 23,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant. None appears for the Respondent. Respondent has been sought to be served, however, Respondent appears to have refused service and hence, Affidavit to that effect along with copy of Telegram sent to the Respondent, has been filed. 2. By this Civil Application, the Applicant is seeking condonation of delay. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, sufficient cause has been made out. There is no case of inaction, - 2 - negligence or want of bonafide. Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). 3. Place the Appeal on board for admission on 16.1.2006. [DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]