le Bsrssli 6 ^.<-(l fy ^) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Petitioner ^.^/^ ^y ^y W.P. No. "1-3 B3 /2004 :/ SUMAN SHRIVASTAVA aged about 44 years^ D/o Late Shri M. D. Shrivastava, Occupation - Govt. Service, R/o 15/43, East of Nirmala School, Nirmala Sector,Dalli RajHaTa— Distt. Durg (C.G.) %•• '^ Respondents ^^ VERSUS ^ State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Tribal Development, Raipur (C.G.) Asstt. Commissioner, Tribal Development, Durg (C.G.) Principal, Govt. Model Higher Secondary School, Daundi, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Shri Maheshwar Singh Kanwar, Upper Division Teacher, Higher Secondary School, Aundhi, Block Manpur, Distt. Rajnandgaon ^-0.) -2- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE APPROPRI- ATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION. 4 <^) l,'. ^mt^T'^it^to 'a^T ^T^ 'WW^ r^ ^TnM-ST, -mfi^FTS', •r^-ri^Ty ^w.-e:...tl.3.B^.a.t...........^ •^?T1qi?^(^f^^) 09-12-2004 Shri Ayaz Naved, Coi^nsel for the petitioner. Sfari Sudhir Agrawal, ] AppUcation for urgenf Heard, Leamed counsel foij matter rclates to traasfer ol that the petitk>ner has bee^i toraasferrcd from Distnct Durg to Distnct Rajnaadgaon (Annexure-P/3). He alscJ mental disorder and Annexure-P/2 is the me^ ^ie competent authority of ^ •ft^T ^ Paael Lawyer for the State. t hearmg is allowed. fhe petittoner submits fhat fhe the petitioner. He further submits vide order dated 24-9-2004 submits fhat the petitioner is mimarried lady. He also ^ubmits that afier fhe deafh of her fafher, fhere is no male me^nber m fhe family of the petitioner, He also submits fhat the pjetitioner's motfaer is sufferiag from her treatinent is goiiig oa, ical document. He also submits fhat for fhe present fhe petijtioner may be given an opportunity of fiUng a detailed repr^sentation before ffaie competent authorily of the respoudentjs, which shall be considered on its own merits in accordance wfith law, Having considered o^d wifhout expressmg aay opiaiion on fhe merits of the case, m fhe opinion of fhis Coiirt, ends of justice will be sewed if a d|rection is given to the petitk>ner to make a detailed reprcsent4tion raising her grievances beforc |the respondents along with a copy QRPRJ_FS 4- XI-HC—78 "^TT s-^^^^ Gowri ^3^ ^T^ff^R, '^H^FI^, °^TRT^r ^...^£...^S2.le.^ •w^r^^O of the petition and this order,| representation beiag filed, th| respondents shaU decide fhe| wifhin 15 days, aad on such ^ com.petent authority of the same on its own xnerite in accordaace wifh law as early a^ possible preferably withia two monfhs Jtom fhe date of receipl^ Learaed counsel for fhi petitioner siibmits that the petitioner has not been reUeveil, He prays that fhe petitioaer inay be aUowed to contiaue. It is directed fhat if fhe ^etitioner has xiot been rcUeved and other person has not jomeid in place of fhe petitioner, fhie petitioner inay be aUowed to co|itinue tUl fhe representation is decided, It is niade clear fhat if] reUeved or ofher person has petitioner, this order witl not ej ^ITR^f ^ "fe^t T^R^R: ^ of the representation. |fhe petitioner has atoeady been Urcady joiaed ia place of the |ititle fhe petitioner to rejoia at fhe earUer place of postiag, With fhe aforcsaid obs^ryation, this petition stands ; disposed of, ConsequenUy, M.W.P4o.4734/2004 also stands disposed of. —-—~ Certified copy as per rule&, §^/, Fakhruddin Judge /•V / ^/y / f'^^ Jr- r. w