1 80 fa.542.10 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 542 OF 2010 Smt. Neha Satyendra Mithbawkar. ... Appellant Versus Satyendra Vijay Mithbawkar. ... Respondent ­­­­­ Ms Seema Sarnaik for the Applicant. Mr. V.S.Paradkar for the Respondent. ­­­­­ CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 10 th October, 2011. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. Both the Appellant and the Respondent are present. 2 The Appellant has received a sum of Rs.1,50,000/­ in terms of the consent terms filed on record. 3 The learned counsel appearing for the parties on instructions of both the Appellant and the Respondent, who are personally present in the Court state that the Appellant and the Respondent have agreed that the permanent custody of the minor daughter Sanika shall remain with the Appellant. 2 80 fa.542.10 4 The appeal stands disposed of in terms of the consent terms dated 22 nd September, 2011. It is clarified that the permanent custody of the minor daughter Sanika shall be with the Appellant. 5 There shall be a decree in terms of the consent terms as well as the agreement recorded as above regarding the permanent custody of the minor child. There will be no order as to costs. 6 Pending civil applications do not survive and the same are disposed of. [ A.S.OKA, J ]