1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No.4263/2010 Shri Shantaram Chandrabhan Kshirsagar Vs. The President, Z.P. Buldana and another. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. Kshirsagar, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. M. P. Kariya, Adv. for respondent no.2. Mr. Raulkar, Adv. for respondent no.1 CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. NOVEMBER 26, 2010. Heard Advocate Kshirsagar for the petitioner, Advocate Raulkar for respondent no.1 and Advocate Kariya for respondents 2. Short contention of Advocate Kshirsagar is that though he sought removal of respondent no.2, respondent no.1 President did not extend any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and even order passed was supplied to him by Block Development Officer after expiry of appeal period. Advocate Raulkar as also Advocate Kariya point out that matter was fixed for hearing on 28.1.200918.2.2009 and 21.12.2009 petitioner did 2 not appear for hearing. While hearing respective counsel it has become clear that these dates were given by B.D.O. and not by President, who has passed impugned order. Report of B.D.O. was also not made available to the petitioner. It is therefore obvious that while taking action on complaint or grievance made by petitioner, he has not been heard. In the circumstances impugned order dated 24.12.2009 is hereby quashed and set aside. Respondent No.1 President shall here present petitioner and thereafter pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. The petitioner to appear before respondent no1/his office on 20th December, 2010 and to abide by his further instructions in the matter. Respondent no.1 shall pass appropriate order as early as possible and in any case by 28th February 2011. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No costs. JUDGE ambulkar