IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 8TH AUGUST 2011 / 17TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 21591 of 2011(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :- ------------------------ P.A.JOSE, S/O.ANTONY, KEEKIRIKKATTU HOUSE, KARIKKATTOOR KARA, MANIMALA VILLAGE, KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.P.KURUVILLA JACOB SMT.RAJI P. JOY RESPONDENT(S) :- -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, KANJIRAPPALLY-686 507. 3. K.S.E.B., REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, K.S.E.B., TRANSMISSION SUB DIVISION, PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 001. STANDING COUNSEL MR.T.R.RAJAN FOR K.S.E.B. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: jvt WP(C).No.21591 OF 2011 APPENDIX Petitioner's Exhibits :- Ext.P1 :- Copy of the land tax receipt dated 11.6.10 issued to petitioner from the Village Office, Manimala. Ext.P2 :- Copy of petitioner's complaint dated 3.3.09 submitted to the District Collector, Kottayam. Ext.P3 :- Copy of report No.418/07 dated 18.8.07 of the Village Officer, Manimala forwarded to the Taluk Office, Kanjirappally. Ext.P4 :- Copy of patta No.D1-7594/07 dated 24.11.09 issued by 3rd respondent in favour of 4th respondent. Ext.P5 :- Copy of order No.LRF9-46315/2010 dated 20.4.11 of the Land Revenue Commissioner Thiruvananthapuram communicated to petitioner. Ext.P6 :- Copy of petitioner's Revision Petition dated 28.5.11 submitted before 1st respondent under Rule 21(9) of the Kerala Land Assignment Rules. Ext.P7 :- Copy of petitioner's stay petition dated 28.5.11 submitted before 1st respondent along with Ext.P6 revision petition. Respondent's Exhibits :- NIL. //True Copy// P.A. to Judge P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.21591 of 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 8th day of August 2011 J U D G M E N T Being aggrieved by Ext.P5 order passed by the Land Revenue Commissioner, the petitioner has approached the first respondent by filing Ext.P6, statutory revision petition, along with Ext.P7 application for interim stay, which are stated as still pending consideration, while coercive steps are being taken in the mean while. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 and the learned Standing Counsel for other respondents. 3. Considering the limited nature of the prayer sought for in this writ petition, this Court finds it not necessary to have a fact adjudication in this matter. Since Ext.P6 petition is a statutory revision, this Court finds it fit and proper to direct the first respondent to consider the W.P.(C) No.21591 of 2011 -: 2 :- same and pass appropriate orders after hearing both the sides. In the said circumstance, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the first respondent to consider Ext.P6 revision petition and pass final orders thereon in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner as well as the K.S.E.B, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 'three months' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the first respondent for further steps. Construction of the compound wall, stated as to be effected by the K.S.E.B, will be subject to the final orders to be passed by the first respondent in the revision petition. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. Jvt