THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No. 1495 OF 2009 Dated: 21-07-2011 Between: Avacha Shyam Sunder ... PETITIONER AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad and two others ... RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No. 1495 OF 2009 ORDER: This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents have violated the directions issued by this Court on 09-10-2009 passed in WPMP No.28136 of 2009 in Writ Petition No. 21657 of 2009. In the aforesaid writ petition, the petitioner herein sought for a writ of mandamus to declare the proceedings of the District Collector – respondent No.2 dated 10-09-2009 as arbitrary and illegal and to issue pattadar pass books and title deeds in his favour in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.1.23 guntas in Survey No. 268 of Urusu Village, Warangal Mandal and Warangal District and to further direct respondent Nos. 2 and 3 therein to allot Acs.8.17 guntas in pursuance of the proceedings of the Tahsildar, Warangal Mandal - respondent No.3 dated 24-08-1960. This court by order dated 09-10-2009 directed the respondents therein not interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the land in question until further orders. In the counter filed on behalf of the respondents while denying the possession of the petitioner, it is stated that as per the orders of the District Collector – respondent No.2, dated 10-09-2009 issued in letter No.E3/5639/05, the land in question was already handed over to the Assistant Social Welfare Officer, Social Welfare Department, Warangal District prior to issuance of the interim orders by this Court. In view of the fact that land in question was handed over to the Assistant Social Welfare Officer, Social Welfare Department, Warangal District prior to issuance of the interim orders by this Court, the respondents cannot be said to have violated the orders of this Court so as to be proceeded against under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The contempt case is accordingly closed. No order as to costs. R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 21-07-2011 ks