ii^ c^ ^•K w '^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAKH AT JESILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 3637 of2008 '% l-c PETITIQNER : Sandeep Kumar Farvi S/o Late Shri Chhedi Lal Farvi, aged about 29 years, resident of village and Post Bitkuli, Tehsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. The Stete of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Adim Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jati, Pichhada Varg Avam Alap Sankhyak Kalyan Vibhag, Mantralaya, DKS Building, Raipur (CG). ^ 2. The Commissioner, Aboriginal Tribe, Schedules Caste, OBC and Minority Welfare Department, Raipur 3. The District. Co-coordinator , Adim Jati Kalyan, Janjgir Champa (CG). 4. The Collector, Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa(CG). 5. The Chief Engineer, Minimata (Hasdeo) Bango Priyojna, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur(CG). 6. The Executive Officer, Mini Mata Bango Canal Division No. 4, Dabhara, District Janjgir Champa (CG). 7. Aiknath Yadav, S/o Late T.R. Yadav, aged about years, resident of Aadim Jati Kalyan Vibhag, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa (CG). (WRTT PETmON UNDER AR'HCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUnON OF NDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present : Shri Bharat Rajput,Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (Pitssed on tlris 21st day ofJuly, 2008) 1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merit at this stage. However, the concemed authorities may be directed to consider and decide representation of petitioner dated 29.11 .2007 (Annexure P/l 8), pendinj before the respondent authorities, in accordance with law, within the prescribed time. fi-' G' 3. Shri Bhaduri, leamed counsel appearing for the State, submits that there is no reason asto why the representation of the petitioner should not be decided expeditiously, in accordance with law. 4. In view ofthe foregoing, this petition is disposed ofwith a direction to the authority concemed to look into the grievances of the petitioner accordiagly and pass appropriate order, in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. Sahu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri