IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 6TH OCTOBER 2009 / 14TH ASWINA 1931 LA.App..No. 237 of 2007(D) ------------------------------- LAR.33/2002 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,THRISSUR .................... APPELLANT(S)/3RD RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------- THRISSUR CORPORATION, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY THRISSUR CORPORATION, THRISSUR-1. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.MOHANDAS SRI.LELLULAL T.G.THUNDATHIL RESPONDENT(S)/CLAIMANT & RESPONDENTS 1 & 2: ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. P.J. SISILY, W/O.K.R.VARGHESE, KANJIRATHINGAL HOUSE, OLARIKKARA DESOM, PULLAZHI, THRISSUR. 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. 3. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, L.A.THRISSUR MUNICIPALITY, THRISSUR. ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI FOR R1 SR. GOVT. PLEADER SMT.LATHA T. THANKAPPAN THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ L. A. A. No.237 of 2007 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 6th day of October, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J Heard Sri.T.G.Lellu Lal and Smt.Sumathy Dandapani, senior counsel for the claimant. Even though, Sri.T.G.Lellu Lal representing for Sri.K.B.Mohandas, the Standing Counsel for the appellant/Requisitioning Authority addressed us very strenuously, having gone through the impugned judgment, we are of the view that the approach of the learned Subordinate Judge was quite reasonable and that the finding regarding the market value has been entered by him on the basis of legal evidence available on record. We do not find any warrant for interference. L. A. A. No.237 of 2007 -2- The appeal will stand dismissed. No costs. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE K. SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE kns/-