IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.103 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2894 OF 2006 WITH REVIEW PETITION NO.104 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2882 OF 2006 WITH REVIEW PETITION NO.105 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2885 OF 2006 Suvarna S. Wagh & Anr. ...Petitioners. v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents. Mr. N.V.Bandiwadekar, adv. For the Petitioners. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, AGP For the Respondent/State. Ms.Leena Patil with Mr.M.S.Karnik, advs. for the Respondent Nos.5 and 6. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 27th January , 2010. P.C. 1 All the review petitions are being disposed off by the common order as they arise from the common order passed in all the writ petitions. 2 The learned Bench after considering the matter on merits, various reasons recorded therein, was pleased to allow the petitions. The - 2 - only ground based on which present review petitions are filed is that review petitioners were also making representation and that has not being considered. 2 In our opinion, that can not be ground for reviewing the order. Various reasons have been given as the petition ought have to be allowed. 3 Hence, the Review Petitions are rejected. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)