IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 14TH OCTOBER 2010 / 22ND ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 25043 of 2010(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- JAMES KURIAKOSE, AGED 67, S/O.KURIAKOSE, KOLATHU, NEELAMPEROOR, KUTTANAD TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.H.BADARUDDIN SMT.NILA. C.V. SMT.B.SHAMEERA SRI.T.T.SUDHEESH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE SECRETARY FOR DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 4. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, REP. BY CHIEF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 5. THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE AT ALAPPUZHA, REP. BY ITS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER-688 001. 6. THE DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTER, ALAPPUZHA, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER-688 001. 7. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA-688 001. /2/ 8. THE NEELAMPEROOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, EARA P.O., NEELAMPEROOR, KUTTANAD TALUK, ALAPPUZHA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN-688 007. 9. M/S.PNT POLYMERS, POLYTHENE PRINTING UNIT, NEELAMPEROOR, KUTTANAD TALUK, ALAPPUZHA-688 007. 10. NARAYANAN THAMPI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O.N.P.PANICKER, RESIDING AT NANTHANANTHU, NEELAMPEROOR, ALAPPUZHA-688 007. 11. K.B.SREEDEVI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, W/O.NARAYANA THAMPI, RESIDING AT NANTHANANTHU, NEELAMPEROOR, ALAPPUZHA-688 007. ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS,SC,POLL.C.BOAR FOR R4-5 SRI.B.PRAMOD FOR R9 TO 11 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. T.K. ARAVINDKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 25043 OF 2010 (E) ===================== Dated this the 14th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Grievance of the petitioner is that in violation of the conditions imposed by the Pollution Control Board in the consent issued by them, respondents 9 to 11 are operating their industrial unit causing environmental pollution. 2. In the report dated 24.9.2010, filed by the Pollution Control Board, it is stated that the Pollution Control Board had inspected the premises on 9.9.2010 and are satisfied that the directions issued by them have all been complied with. Therefore, there cannot be any surviving grievance for the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the Pollution Control Board shall conduct periodical inspections and ensure compliance of conditions imposed by them for the running of the Industrial Unit by respondents 9 to 11. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE vi