1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi WRIT PETITION NO. 396 OF 2010. Nitin Gopal Dhadve & Ors. ..Petitioners. v/s. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. ..Respondent. .... Ms. Anjali Awasthi, for Petitioner. Mr. J. Reis, Senior Advocate, a/w. Trupti Puranik, for Respondent. Mr. Anand Gupta, Executive Director of M/s. A.A. Estate, a Group of RNA, present. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 2ND MARCH 2010. P.C. By this writ petition, the petitioners have impugned the judgments passed by the learned Judge of the City Civil Court all dated 10th February 2010, whereunder the appeals filed by the petitioners impugning the orders passed by the Enquiry Officer of the respondent Corporation under section 105B of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act dated 31st October 2009, are dismissed. 2. The writ petition was at the admission stage taken up for final hearing by the consent of the parties. The learned 2 Advocate appearing for the petitioners raised several contentions before this Court. However, ultimately, the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners on instructions submitted, that if the developer agrees to abide by the agreement dated 2nd August 2003 which is annexure-A-I to the compilation of documents tendered by the petitioners, the petitioners will not press any of the contentions/objections raised by them and shall withdraw the writ petition. 3. In view thereof, though the developer was not a party to this writ petition, this Court in order to assist the petitioners and put to an end to their grievance went out of its way by allowing the petitioners to give notice to the developer to appear before this Court. Pursuant to such notice, Mr.Anand Gupta, Executive Director of the developer M/s. A.A. Estate, (RNA Group), is present before this Court. Mr.Gupta undertakes before this Court that the developer shall abide by the development agreement dated 2nd August 2003, which is annexure-A-I to the compilation of documents, submitted by the petitioners in all respects and the individual agreements with the petitioners shall be executed by the developer within a period of one week from today and the same shall also be registered. The undertaking 3 given by the developer is accepted. 4. In view of this undertaking on the part of the developer, the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners seeks liberty to withdraw the writ petition and also seeks time to vacate their respective premises within a period of four weeks after the agreements are executed. The writ petition is therefore, disposed of as withdrawn and the time of four weeks as sought by the petitioners to vacate their respective premises is granted to the petitioners. [ S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ]