1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.4 OF 2010 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.138 OF 2007 Devraya S. Padiyar .... Applicant Vs. Prakash M. Advani & Anr. .... Respondents Ms Prabha Badadre i/b Shri P.R. Arjunwadkar for the Applicant. Shri Umesh Mankapure for the Respondents. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JULY 2, 2010 P.C: Taken up on board on request. The applicant had not pressed the civil revision application and, therefore, by the order dated 29-6-2007 it was dismissed. Now the applicant seeks a review of that order on the ground that after dismissal of the said revision application, the first respondent and his brother have constructed some RCC structure and therefore the first respondent s bona fide need does not survive. This ground is not open to the applicant in review. Landlords and their relations are not supposed to keep their hands 2 tied. Merely because the landlord and/or his brother have carried out some construction, that cannot be a ground for the tenant to turn around and again press the revision which was not pressed and allowed to be dismissed as such. The review petition is, therefore, dismissed. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)