IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1883 of 2006 SIDHNATH PRASAD GUPTA Versus KASHINATH PRASAD GUPTA & ORS ----------- 2. 23.10.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the petitioner cannot be allowed to question indirectly an order dated 21.8.1997 transposing defendant no.3 as a plaintiff or the subsequent order allowing amendment in the plaint dated 29.7.2004 on the purported ground of review of the said order. It has to be noted that a civil revision application against the order dated 21.8.1997 has also been dismissed though for default. That being so, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/