IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 175 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 17 OF 2005 SHRI SURESH D.NAIK, MAPUSA GOA. ....Applicant Versus SHRI SHANTADURGA HIGHER SECONDARY ....Respondents SCHOOL, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN OF MANAGING COMMITTEE & 2 ORS., Shri M.S.Sonak, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri S.R.Rivonkar, Govt. Advocate for Respondents no.2 and 3. Coram:- R. M. LODHA, J. Date:- 7th October, 2005 P.C.: Heard Mr. M.S.Sonak, Advocate for the Applicant and Mr. S.R. Rivonkar, Govt.Advocate for Respondents No.2 and 3. None appears for Respondent No.1. Having reflected over the matter, I am satisfied that no direction deserves to be given to Respondents No.1 and 2 for not appointing any person to the post of Vice Principal (Vocational Stream). It is made clear that any appointment made to the post of Vice Principal (Vocational Stream) shall be subject to the decision in the Writ Petition. It is further clarified that the aspect of financial benefits to the applicant-petitioner so long as he worked as Vice Principal (Vocational Stream) or continued as such by respondents No.1 and 2, shall be considered at the time of disposal of the Writ Petition. Civil Application stands disposed of. R. M. LODHA, J. sl.