1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1102 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1102 OF 2011 *** 1. Heard Advocate Shri Ghatol Patil for the Petitioner and learned A.G.P. Mr. K. J. Ghute Patil for Respondent Nos.1 to 7. 2. Shri Ghatol Patil has pointed out that before rejection of stay by Additional Commissioner, allegedly on 29th November, 2010 the order impugned in Revision and passed by Additional Collector has been implemented. He states that the matter was closed for orders by that authority on 15th November, 2010 and on 11th January, 2011 this Court in Writ Petition No. 10941 of 2010 directed that authority to pass those orders within one month. This Court also directed parties to maintain status quo in the meanwhile and, thereafter, in back date orders are shown to have been passed on 29th November, 2010. He further states that taking advantage of all this, Respondent No.8 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1102 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. may create some third party encumbrances on suit properties. 3. Learned A.G.P. points out that impugned order rejecting stay is passed on 29th November, 2010 itself but it could not be pointed out to this Court on 11th January, 2011. 4. In this situation, as revision filed by the petitioner is still pending, I am not inclined to go into the argument that a responsible officer like Additional Commissioner has ante-dated his order. The interest of petitioner can be protected by directing parties to maintain status quo as on today and by directing Additional Commissioner (Respondent No.3) to decide revision pending before him as early as possible and in any case by 31st March, 2011. 5. Accordingly, the parties are directed to maintain status quo as on today till 31st March, 2011 and Respondent No.3 to decide 3 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1102 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. revision pending, in the meanwhile. Petitioner is directed to appear before Respondent No.3 on 21st February, 2011 and to communicate this order to it, and to act as per its directions thereafter. 6. Petition is, thus, partly allowed. No costs. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:14/02/2011. ans/1102