IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11509 of 2006 1. Santosh Kumar, Son of Uma Shankar Singh, Resident of Village Bhaluhi, Panchayat Bhualpur, Police Station Marhorwa, District Chapra (Saran). 2. Niharika Kumari, Wife of Rana Pratap Singh, Resident of Village Bhaluhi, Panchayat Bhualpur, Police Station Marhorwa, District Chapra (Saran). 3. Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Son of Sachidanand Singh, Resident of Village Pojhi Kapur, Panchayat Bhualpur, Police Station Morhorwa, District Chapra (Saran). --------- Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Commissioner, Chapra Commissionary, Chapra, Saran. 4. The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra. 5. The District Education Officer, Saran at Chapra. 6. The Block Development Officer, Marhowrah Block, Marhowrah, District Chapra. 7. The Mukhiya, Bhualpur Gram Chanchayat, Police Station Marhorwa, District Chapra. 8. The Panchayat Sachiv, Bhualpur Gram panchayat, Police Station Marhorwa, District Chapra. 9. Kamlesh Kumar Singh, Son of Sri Baidhya Nath Singh, Resident of Village Bhaluhi, Police Station Marhorwa, District Chapra. ---------- Respondents ----------- 2 24.08.2010 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners. Counsel for the State is present. The prayer of the petitioners in this writ application reads as follows:- “1(I) For direction to Respondents concerned enquire the illegalities in appointment of the Shiksha Mitra in Bhualpur done by the Respondent No.7 and 8. (II) For that the direction that if after enquiry, if it is found that the appointment was done illegally then 2 the appointment of appointed persons may be cancelled and in place of said persons suitable persons may be appointed.” As would appear, the challenge of the petitioners to the appointment of the respondent nos.7 & 8 on the post of Shiksha Mitra came to be made after the post of Shiksha Mitra was abolished and the respondent nos. 7 & 8 had already been absorbed on the post of Panchayat Shikshak. In that view of the matter, this Court would find it difficult now to go into the alleged illegality in the appointment of the respondent nos. 7 & 8. As noted above, the consequential relief sought by the petitioners of making appointment of suitable persons on the post of Shiksha Mitra would no longer survive in view of the abolition of the post of Shiksha Mitra with effect from 1.7.2006. That being so, this application is wholly without merit and the same is accordingly dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)