ONSTI Petit ioner Cxb'LA Respondent s — 1. State Of.M-..£~, OF JU'DICA‘JERIS) ALE §1LASPUR:C.G. OF 2000 EhlDdYLO ’2 J Oi? UNEER ARTICLE 226 Sc 227, TUTION OF ILNDIA — Gorelal Dhrua S/o Q nwgrggmd ageé Sarpanch , Gram Panchayat , Dhabad ih , R/o Baloda Bazarmistrict Raipur (C.G.) ‘§’ Vs. Through-Collec “tor , Raipur (Chhat i sgarh ) , 2. Z119. Panchayat,Raipur, Through.Chief Executive Of£icer, Raipur . 3. Sub—Divisional Officer,Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (Chhatisgarh) 3a W, ¥ . . ' Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur w.P. No. 37/2000 m m HO 200 mm (W) i Wmm $1 VEWI$ m ‘ , , WW ‘ ' * 3%“ a. . 1a“ ‘ 8/12/2000 " ‘ ‘ Shri Sanjay Shyam Aga’rwal, learned 'counsel for the‘petitioner. Shri Ranveer Singh. learned coun$l for respondents 2" nos. 1 and 3. Heard . confronted withJthe, $1tuation'thart the order -impugned c'an be challeng dzbefore the Appellate Authority, learned counsel for the Eetitioner seeks to withdraw ‘the petition with liberty to file an appeal before the'Appe- llate Authority in acc‘ore‘a‘nce with the provisions‘of Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Rej Adhiniyam. The petition appears {:07'Vha‘ve been fileo on 18/117200” the order impugned was iSsued on 7/11/2000 and ae such‘the petition was filed within 11 days of the order¢ ’me petition remained pending in this ccurt between 18/11/2000 till date. Taking into consideration that the petition renained Eending in this court between 18/11/2000 to 8/12/2000, It direct that if the petitioner files an appeal before the Com Detent Ant ority within: 15 ‘days front today, the-euestion of limitfion \ ‘ . M azas notkellowed OL GRPRJ~FSIZ42~2I2000 30000 fsf XI-I-IG—78 aarwma, Chhattisgarh/k aspur . v, V , u . \ ‘ wast 1m; (W) WWW ‘ WWW WWW mmifwm %Wm g. 2 n to be raised by parjry and the Appellate Authority any ‘ woul’bi bé’ required tode ‘ idé‘Ithe appéal on merits 1n acccrdance with law. ‘ J The petit1cn Vis‘ disposed of with lyib‘errgzy“ as aforesaid. Sd/- § 1V R.S.Garg \ ‘ Judge ‘ rsnr