IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 11736 of 2006 Between: Mohammed Javed Ali S/o.Mohammed Massod Ali R/o.H.No.9-11-57/A, Golconda Fort, Qazi Galli, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, hyderabad city Basheerbagh, Hyderabad 2 The Deputy Commissioner of Police, West Zone,A.G.Guard Hyderabad 3 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, golconda Division Hyderabad 4 The Inspector of Police, Golconda Police Station hyderabad 5 The Inspector of Police, Task Force West Zone Parade ground, Secunderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more speciﬁcally in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents No.3 and 4 to close down the rowdy sheet opered against the petitioner in the month of July 2003 and subsequently transferred to police station Golconda and consequently the respondent No.1 to 5 be directed not to call the petitioner frequently in the Police station and detained days together under the guise of rowdy sheet and such any other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MOHD.QASIM Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI W.P.No.11736 of 2006 ORAL ORDER This writ petition is ﬁled seeking a direction to the respondents 3 and 4 to close down the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner in the month of July-2003, which was subsequently transferred to Golkonda P.S. It is the case of the petitioner that the rowdy sheet was opened against the petitioner on a single incident which also ended in acquittal and therefore there is absolutely no justiﬁable reason to continue the rowdy sheet. Hence the writ petition. In the counter-aﬃdavit it is stated that the petitioner was involved in Cr.No.280 of 2006 under Section.341 and 506 IPC on the ﬁle of the Golkonda P.S. basing on the complaint of one Smt.Shahzadi Begum alleging that the petitioner forcibly took her daughter with children by showing sword to kill her son and also creating nuisance every time at her residence and the above case is pending investigation. It is also alleged that the petitioner’s movements are very dangerous and there is necessity to keep a watch over him since there are oral complaints against the petitioner that he is doing unlawful activities. Be that as it may, since the learned Government Pleader for Home across the bar stated that the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner is valid up to 31-12-2008 and that the respondents are going to review whether it is necessary to continue the rowdy sheet for a further period, without going into the merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to review the case of the petitioner, after giving him an opportunity of being heard, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law on or before 31-12-2008. No costs. _______________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt.18.10.2008 *T SNR