THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.34570 of 2011 Date: 29.12.2011 Between: Nagireddy Venkateswara Rao and others. … Petitioners and State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.34570 of 2011 ORDER : Heard Sri Naram Nageswara Rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, as well as the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3. 2. This writ petition is filed without there being any cause of action. 3. The petitioners claim that the 1st petitioner is a Founder and Convener of Anti-Corruption Fighting Committee and an active Telugu Desam Party worker. They allege that the 4th respondent, who belongs to the Ruling Congress Party, during his tenure as Chairman of Zilla Parishad, has committed several irregularities, including the acts of misappropriation of funds and the 1st petitioner exposed his activities to the public. The 4th respondent, therefore, bore grudge against the 1st petitioner and he is indirectly encouraging his followers to foist false criminal cases against the 1st petitioner and other petitioners, who are his family members. The petitioners allege that several crimes are registered against them at the instance of the followers of the 4th respondent and he is pressurizing respondent Nos.1 to 3 to open rowdy sheets against them. 4. On the aforesaid allegations, the petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.1 to 3 in attempting to register criminal cases and to open rowdy sheets against them, as arbitrary and illegal. 5. Admittedly, so far no rowdy sheet has been opened against the petitioners. The petitioners do not dispute that there are some F.I.Rs. registered against them and in one case charge sheet has been filed for the offence under Sections 448, 376 read with 511, 307, 506 (2) read with 34 of I.P.C. in Crime No.129 of 2010 of Razole Police Station. The question whether the petitioners are falsely implicated in the cases and whether it is required to open rowdy sheets against them are the matters, which are to be considered by the authorities concerned. 6. In the admitted fact situation that so far no such action has been taken against the petitioners, this writ petition, which has been filed on mere apprehension, cannot be entertained. 7. For the aforesaid reasons, this writ petition is not maintainable and it is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. 8. In view of disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.43010 of 2011 is dismissed as unnecessary. ________________________ JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI 29.12.2011. Msr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.34570 of 2011 29.12.2011 (Msr)