Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr.M.P.(M) No.139 of 2010 Dated of Decision: March 09, 2010. Ram Lal. …..… Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. ……. Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?No. For the Petitioners : Mr. Naveen Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Add. Advocate General. Surinder Singh, J (oral): The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in FIR No.43 of 2010 dated 4.2.2010 registered in Police Station Kullu, H.P. under Sections 153-A, 501 and 502 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Precisely, the allegations against the petitioner are. He had taken a portion of Dhalpur ground, Kullu on lease, for organizing exhibition, for a period of one month. He raised stalls and leased it out further to various persons and one to Sh. Jeet Singh resident of Mandi district, who had displayed certain books, which were allegedly containing the material against Hindu Gods and certain National leaders. According to the learned Additional Advocate General for the respondent, the petitioner did not maintain the record of the 2 persons to whom the stalls were leased out and money charged from them. In view of the aforesaid position, the continuous custody of the petitioner for the interrogation is not required. There are reasonable grounds to the petitioner that he would be arrested in the non-bailable offence. As such, his request for pre-arrest bail is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of his arrest, he be released on bail on his furnishing the bail bonds in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and this bail shall be subject to the following conditions that the petitioner: (i) Shall cooperate with the investigation of this case to take it to the logical end; (ii) shall present in the court as and when required; (iii) shall not make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts truly to the court or to any police officer; and (iv) shall not repeat such an offence in future. In case the petitioner shall make breach of any of the conditions aforesaid, the liberty of his bail shall be cancelled. Application is disposed of. March 09, 2010. (Surinder Singh) (Pds) Judge.