c^ i^ IN THEHON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) N0. S 12010 E PETITIONER RESPONDENTS o ...••''" ^^' .-»i!*> lo<^" Y " . 'A*"* Smt. Sarla Jain, W/o Rajkumar Jain, aged about 40 years, Middle School, Badaipara, Nayapara, Rajim, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. / State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. ' District Education Officer, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. '' Treasury Officer, Treasury, Accounts and Pension, . Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. '^..•••""^y s^i^ ..'-••^v---"\\"-y .•-"^.J7-'"' \ .>"' (\ 31^1 qil PW^, '^SSTT 3?T^?T spTlh? d-°=l'<<1<1K1<), O-at'M'Ko, fs(cll^li< S) ......^.e:..oo..(^.j5'T2-S| sn^?[ 'v^i (ly4«<<tT) TOtRR^HfefalI^T SB : HON'BLB MR. JUSTICB flRITIMKER DIWAKBR 04.10,2010 Shri Soiitkant Verma, Shri Vivek Sharma, P.L. coilinsel t): Counsel for the petition^r entifled to benefit of two advaDlee having passed B.Ed. examinati^n own cost. It is submitted fhat petition is no longer res integrifi decided by the Hon'ble Supr^m' Saxeaa Vs. State of M.P. & similar view ia its order datedj 'siraferin-wraf-^ fe^ •(fip^Tt ^affitH 31^71 for the petitioner. ir fh.e State. submits fhat fhe petitioner is iacrements on account of sfae befbre her appointment at her pie issue involved in fhe present and fhe same has been finaUy jme Court ia tfae case of Asha i. 2009 (IIIJMPJR (8C) 59. Oijs It is further submitted tbat fhis Court has also taken a 6.2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6257/2008. Counsel for the p^titioner furfher subinlts ftiat the oider dated 29,.4.2010 passe4 m Writ Appeal N0. 124/2009, wherein relying upon the judgajient ofthe Supretae Court in the case ofAsha Saxena (supra) sa^d the order passed by this CoKrt ia aaofher Writ Appeal No. (87/2009, directions have been issued for consideration of th| Couasel for fhe State would also be considered on ty case for grant of two advance iacrenients as per circular dat^d 21.9.1974 issued by the State of Madtiya Pradesh, after veriGjsation of fhe facts pleaded in the petition. sijteinits that case of the petitioner same Unes. n .__.../: ';..fe ^ .XI-HC—78 T5( "qiqidq, 0xi1y]la, fa|(»f|y^< ..^t>...(?..:.G^..A:. sn^T'traq;' (li.cif^»i<isi) an^i w Wl* "WT 3T^T ffi^iqi I^IIWdf5!f 311^1 In view of above, t.he direction to the respoadent petitioner for graat of two dafed 21;9.1974 issued by th^ verification ofthe facts pleadedj e^ht weeks from today. ct»i<<[<vt4l'1 fctrH?ff ^ t^T^ <i^it^i< ^affipiaiit?! ^etition is disposed of wifh a autlliorities to decide fhe claim offhe adv^ace iacrenients as per circtilar State of Madhya Pradesh after |ia the petition withia a period of Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge