IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-19213 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 14.07.2011 Gagan Dev Bharti ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Jastej Singh, Advocate for the complainant. ..... RAJESH BINDAL, J. The FIR in question was got registered by the complainant with the allegations that the petitioner entered into an agreement to sell with him on 1.2.2011. The petitioner received a sum of ` 3,50,000/- as earnest money from the complainant. Prior to the date for registration of sale deed i.e. 27.4.2011, the property was sold to someone else on 28.2.2011. The FIR was got registered on 9.4.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is disputing the fact that any agreement was executed with the complainant. The fact, as to whether there was a valid agreement executed between the parties, is yet to be established for which custodial interrogation of the peti- tioner is not necessary. The petitioner will appear before the Investigating Officer on 22.07.2011 at 10.00 a.m. and further whenever summoned. In case of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. He shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for investigation. He shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 14.07.2011 sharmila