l'''y l^ ;"' 11'^, ^^^s^ f^.: U:! IF WKiT PEt Hon'ble Shri. sunli Kumar Sinha J. & W.pJCs. No.2000of-2011 Mf's Ashutosh Steeis, propnetorship firm, Opposite Akashwani, Rawanbhata, Kaipur, tnrough its l-ropnetor Muran Lai Agrawal, S/o Lato Shri Motila! Agrawai, 3QSO SOO'UI 40 yQfS; %'Q A-^^i iVtSCIuSV Rao Sapre Nagar, Biraaon, Raipur (C.G.) versus South East Centrai Railway, through its Cl^lef Msteri^! ^snsQer- South Es^t Centrai Raiiv»av, Bilaspur (CG.) Depuw Chief Materiai ivianaaer (Dy. CMM), (Sales), Gene-rai Store-s Depot, Soutn Central Raiiway, Raipur (C.G.) Controlier of Stores, South East Centrai Raiiway, Bilaspur (CG). Assistant Material Manager (SY), Generai 04'M—S.ffP^Ann» C^.r*|n CA/^i./^ni-t^j.^.I OnUint.St/ •.^i.v.^^? i^fvyvt, ^svufcE! uuSzoi. T.-^'^ii'u; ssi i •^sit'svaj , Raipur (C.u.) OT THE CONSTITUTiON OF SA Mr. vivek Ranjan Tiwari, Advocate for fhe petitioner. IVH. fM3iltSHQK ^iHsi^; ftQVOCSIS iOI i^/SpOllCISHIS. Oi hotlowina orai Kumar Sinha^J. of the Court was passed by Heard. (2) Mr. Abhishek Sinha, learned counsei for the respondents, raises preliminary objection that in "iew of the provision of Ciause 17 of the Genera! Conditions of Sale bv A.udion, this writ pemion would not' be maintainabie. He further submits that the subject i!lfe, ll;1ii, iots, for which the petitjoner 'nad offered the bids, have aiready haan !5iir'ftftrf£aH+A -a fhirH ^srh; nn 1 Ru[ ^nrii Qnl1 't (3) Mr. Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, iearned counsel for the petitioner, in view of above objections taken by the respondents, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petifion with iiberty to avail appropriate remedy available to the petitioner under the iaw. (4) Permission granted. (5) Accordingly, the wrlt petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitloner. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge