IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID FRIDAY, THE 5TH AUGUST 2011 / 14TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 15437 of 2011(D) -------------------------- LAR.173/2008 of SUB COURT, PAYYANNUR .................... PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. CHOORAKKATTU BALAN,S/O.CHIYAYI, PUNCHAKKADU POST, PAYYANNUR,TALIPARAMBA TALUK KANNUR DIST 2. THIDILPONGI KARTHYAYANI, D/O.MANIKKAN,PILICODE POST,KASARAGOD DISTRICT 3. T.P.CHANDRAN, S/O.POKKAN, KODUVAKKAD,PILICODE POST, KASARAGOD DIST 4. N.M.ALEEMA, ETTIKKULAM POST RAMANTHALI VAZHI, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DIST 5. PADINJAREPURAYIL PARU, W/O.LATE KUNHIRAMAN,KARANTHADU POST, KANNUR DISTRICT 6. NARAN KULANGARA ACHUTHAN, S/O.CHIYEYI, KARAMEL, ANNUR POST, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DIST 7. ETTUMMAL GOVINDAN, S/O.KORAN, PUNCHAKKADU POST, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DIST 8. JOHN KARIMBUVALAPPIL, CHOOLAKKADAVU, RAMANTHALI POST,KANNUR DIST (CNTD...2) WP(C).No. 15437 of 2011(D) ::2:: 9. MOUVANAL JAYPALAN, S/O.KALLYANI KORAM POST, PAYYANNUR, KANNUR DIST 10. RUGMINI D.NAIR, D/O.V.SANGARAN NAIR, KUNDILE VEETTIL, ANNUR POST, TALIPARAMBA TAULK,KANNUR DISTRICT BY ADV.MR.SERGI JOSEPH THOMAS MR.K.M.AUGUSTINE RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,KANNUR-679001 3. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(L.A) EZHIMALA NAVAL ACADEMY,PAYYANNUR KANNUR DISTRICT-679301 4. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.A.GENERAL)THALASSERY-679101 GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.M.MUHAMMED SHAFI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 15437 of 2011(D) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: REVISED JUDGMENT DTD. 9.2.2010 PASSED BY THE SUB COURT, PAYYANNUR IN L.A.R.NO.18/04. EXT.P2: E.P.NO.1/07 DTD. 20.12.2006 ON THE FILE OF THE SUB COURT, PAYYANNUR. EXT.P3: CALCULATION STATEMENT FILED BY R2 IN E.P.NO.1/07. EXT.P4: E.P.NO.52/09 ON THE FILES OF SUB COURT, PAYYANNUR. EXT.P5: CALCULATION STATEMENT SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT IN E.P.NO.52/09. EXT.P6: DECREE DTD. 22.9.2009 PASSED BY THE SUB COURT, PAYYANNUR IN L.A.R.NO.70/08. EXT.P7: DECREE DTD. 22.9.2009 PASSED BY THE SUB COURT, PAYYANNUT IN L.A.R.NO.82/08. EXT.P8: E.P.NO.119/10 FILED BY 3RD PETITIONER. EXT.P9: E.P.NO.120/10 FILED BY 4TH PETITIONER. EXT.P10: JUDGMENT DTD. 15.10.2009 PASSED BY THE SUB COURT, PAYYANNUR IN FAVOUR OF THE 4TH PETITIONER. EXT.P11: JUDGMENT DTD. 23.12.2009 PASSED BY THE SUB COURT, PAYYANNUR. EXT.P12: DECREE DTD. 23.12.2009 IN L.A.R.NO.88/08. EXT.P13: JUDGMENT DTD.18.2.2010 PASSED BY THE SUB COURT, PAYYANNUR. EXT.P14: JUDGMENT DTD. 3.3.2010 IN L.A.R.NO.109/2008. EXT.P15: JUDGMENT DTD. 19.3.2010 IN L.A.R.NO.73/2008. EXT.P16: COMMON JUDGMENT DTD. 22.12.2009 PASSED IN FAVOUR OF THE 10TH PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE. HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No.15437 Of 2011 ---------------------- Dated this the 5th day of August, 2011. J U D G M E N T The writ petition is filed for a direction commanding the first respondent to allot sufficient amount for the satisfaction of the decrees passed by the Sub Court, Payyannur, relating to the land acquired for the establishment of Naval Academy, Ezhimala, within the period to be fixed by this Court and for a direction directing the 2nd respondent to deposit the amount in court for disbursement of the decreetal amount with statutory interest as shown in the execution petitions as well as in the calculation statements that are filed on the basis of various judgments passed by the Sub Court, Payyannur and for other incidental reliefs. 2. The properties belonging to the petitioners were acquired for the establishment of Naval Academy, as per the notification published on 22.2.1983. The reference court passed a decree in favour of the petitioners granting enhancement of compensation. The petitioners filed execution petitions and the ::2:: W.P.(C).No.15437 Of 2011 same is pending consideration before the execution court. The execution petitions are filed for realization of the decree amount with statutory interest. The writ petition filed more or less for the same reliefs is not sustainable in law. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to work out their remedies before the civil court. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. bkn/-