-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.3574 OF 2007 NO.3574 OF 2007 NO.3574 OF 2007 ............................................................. ............................................................. ............................................................. Office Notes,Office Office Notes,Office Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, memorandum of Coram, memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s appearances,Court’s appearances,Court’s Court’s Court’s Court’s or or or orders or directions orders or directions orders or directions Judge’s Judge’s Judge’s orders orders orders & Registrar’s orders. & Registrar’s orders. & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. ............................................................. ............................................................. Mr.Ajit P. Kenjale for the Petitioner CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 4,2007. : JULY 4,2007. : JULY 4,2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. By this Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India, the Petitioner has challenged the order dated 18th November 2006 passed by the Trial Court by which an application made by the Petitioners under Rule 9 of Order XXVI of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 has been rejected. The order is purely of interlocutory nature. Apart from the fact that the order is purely of interlocutory nature, the Petitioners can always apply to the appropriate Survey Officer under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code,1966 for carrying out the survey and measurement. 2. Subject to what is stated above, Writ Petition is not entertained and the same is rejected. -2- JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE