IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE NO.14543 OF 2008 1. RAM PUKAR SINGH, SON OF LATE RAM KHELAVAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SURAJ MANDAL, POLICE STATION BARACHATTI, DISTRICT GAYA 2. AJAY KUMAR SINGH, SON OF LATE KULDEEP SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SURAJ MANDAL, POLICE STATION BARACHATTI, DISTRICT GAYA 3. UDAY SINGH, SON OF SUNIL SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SURAJ MANDAL, POLICE STATION BARACHATTI, DISTRICT GAYA 4. RAM DULARI DEVI, WIFE OF RAM PUKAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SURAJ MANDAL, POLICE STATION BARACHATTI, DISTRICT GAYA 5. CHANDRAKANTI DEVI, WIFE OF LATE JAGDISH NARAYAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SURAJ MANDAL, POLICE STATION BARACHATTI, DISTRICT GAYA 6. URMILA DEVI, WIFE OF SHARMA PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SURAJ MANDAL, POLICE STATION BARACHATTI, DISTRICT GAYA 7. SURYADEO SINGH, SON OF LATE RAM KHELAWAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SURAJ MANDAL, POLICE STTION BARACHATI, DISTRICT GAYA 8. SATYENDRA NARAYAN SINGH, SON OF RAM PARWESH SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SURAJ MANDAL, POLICE STATION BARACHATTI, DISTRICT GAYA 9. SHANTI DEVI, WIFE OF LATE SITARAM MISTRI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHADEYA, POLICE STATION BARACHATTI, DISTRICT GAYA 10. RAJESH KUMAR, SON OF LATE DASRATH YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHARAM THAN, POLICE STATION BARACHATTI, DISTRICT GAYA VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COMMISSIONER, MAGADH DIVISION, GAYA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GAYA 4. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SHERGHATI, GAYA 5. THE COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 6. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER, ADMINISTRATION SALE TAX, GAYA ********** 4 15/11/2011 There are two complaints on behalf of the petitioners. The villagers of Suraj Mandal, Dhiraj Bigha and Dharmthan are aggrieved by the fact that while the road was being laid down and the boundary wall 2 measuring 15 feet high was being constructed, the concerned authorities have blocked the drainage by which the village was able to get supply of water for the purposes of irrigation on one side of the road. As a result of constructing the boundary wall, the villagers have further been inconvenienced as they have to walk about a kilometer to assess the road. It is also alleged that one side of the road becomes completely dry, whereas the other side is flooded, which leads to further problem for the villagers as it proves as impediment for agricultural authorities. It is also alleged that the drainages have been blocked which further leads to problem for the villagers These aspects of the matter cannot be examined by this Writ Court. It would be proper for the petitioner to move the concerned authorities for redressal of their grievances. This writ application is accordingly disposed of. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)