IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8168 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 06, 2010. Lovedeep Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.A.D.S.Ghuman, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.B.S.Chahal, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of the order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to seek any counter-reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 23.10.2009 (Annexure P-2) whereby his appointment as JBT/ETT Teacher was cancelled and his services have been dispensed with on the ground that the experience certificate produced by him has been found to be bogus. C.W.P.No .8168 of 2010 2 The petitioner, on the other hand, submits that the experience certificate produced by him is genuine. Alternatively, it is averred that even if no marks are awarded to the petitioner for experience, still he makes it to the merit list. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. The controversy involved in this case has already been settled by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.11111 of 2009 (Parminder Kaur versus State of Punjab and others), decided on 18.3.2010. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the aforesaid Parminder Kaur's case (supra). Dasti. May 06, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE