THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.A.No.645 of 2011 ORDER: (Per Sri G.M,J) 1 This Writ Appeal is directed against the order dated 21.07.2011 passed by a learned single Judge of this court in W.P.No.17876 of 2011, whereby the learned single Judge directed the respondents to publish the results of the elections that were held on 13.07.2011 to the first respondent Association. 2 Appellant being the petitioner filed the Writ Petition No.17876 of 2011 to declare the bye-law No.26 of the Andhra Cricket Association registered society No.25/1953, as unconstitutional and consequently to declare the election notification issued by the General Body meeting dated 29.06.2011 as void and to refrain the Andhra Cricket Association from conducting election schedule on 13.07.2011. 3 Admittedly, elections to the first respondent Association were conducted on 13.07.2011 and a court observer was also appointed for overseeing the smooth and hassle free election process to be undertaken. It is also an admitted fact that the petitioner is a contesting candidate in the said elections. 4 The learned single Judge who heard the matter, had directed the respondents to publish the results of the elections that were held on 13.07.2011 while noticing that the view taken by the Court observer as well as the Election Officer in accepting two nominations, which were contested as not maintainable appears to be tenable and correct view; however, that being the subject matter of the OP, we do not wish to pronounce any final opinion thereon at present. 5 We have heard the learned counsel on either side. The learned counsel for the appellant contended that the learned single Judge ought not to have directed publication of results inasmuch as the very prayer of the appellant in the Writ Petition is to direct the respondents refraining from conducting election and when once the results are announced nothing remains there for adjudication. 6 However, this court is of the prima facie opinion that the said contention is a mere apprehension. Having regard to the contentions raised by the counsel on either side and in view of the fact that the O.P. is pending before the learned III Additional District Judge, Guntur, we direct the learned III Additional District Judge, Guntur to dispose of the Election O.P. in accordance with law, without being influenced by any of the observations made either in this order or in the order passed by the learned single Judge on the material placed before him, independently. 7 The Writ Appeal is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ---------------------------- GHULAM MOHAMMED, J Date:21.10.2011 ---------------------- SANJAY KUMAR, J Kvsn