IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.R No.296 of 2009 Date of Decision:8.3.2010 Sohan Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Ajay Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. The present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 1.11.2008 dismissing the application for cancellation of bail against the order dated 25.5.2007 vide which Addl. Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, allowed regular bail to respondent No.2 on the statement of SI Sukhraj Singh that respondent No.2 has joined the investigation and his signature were duly got compared. It was further stated by SI Sukhraj Singh that respondent No.2 was not required. The only ground raised by learned counsel for the petitioner is that co-accused of respondent No.2 was granted bail after he remained in custody for two months whereas respondent No.2 was never taken in custody. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the case file, there is no allegation that respondent No.2 has misused the concession of bail or the said bail was taken on misstating facts. No ground for cancellation of bail is made out. Dismissed. 8.3.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE