1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6597 OF 2006 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 983 OF 2007 Mr.Raghavan Kudrumal ... Petitioner v/s The State of Maharashtra & anr. ... Respondents Mr.S.K.Chaurasia for the petitioner/applicant. Mr.R.M.Patne, A.G.P. for the State. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 24TH JUNE, 2009 P.C.: 1. Despite the order dated 25.3.2008 the petitioner i.e. the applicant in the civil application has not complied with the office objections. The injunction writ could not be served on the respondents since the full and correct address of the respondent No.2 was not furnished by the applicant. Hence, civil application stands dismissed. 2 2. The writ petition has been moved for extension of the stay granted on 16.4.2007. By this order, this Court had permitted the petitioners to amend the writ petition by adding respondent No.2 as a party respondent in the petition as well as in the civil application. Although that amendment has been carried out the, the petitioner has not furnished the correct address of the respondent No.2. The Bhatta charges have not been paid as recorded by the order dated 19.7.2007. The ad-interim relief which was granted on 5.4.2007 was extended only upto 16.4.2007. Thereafter there is no order of this Court extending that ad-interim relief. 3. In these circumstances, in my view, there is no need to grant the prayer sought today for extension of ad-interim relief when there is no such relief operating from 2007 till today. 4. Place the petition for admission on 13.7.2009. ..... 3