IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24444 of 2010 SUNIL TANTI, S/o Sri Veer Tanti. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 09.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The Submission of the counsel for the petitioner is that there is no element of abduction in the case since admittedly the alleged deceased had left with the accused persons willingly. Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District & Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-I, Munger in connection with S.Tr. No. 556 of 2009/151 of 2009 arising out of Jamalpur P.S. Case No. 96 of 2008 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the 2 other bailor shall be the father/brother of the deceased. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. In case the Trial Court receives any complaint against the petitioner that he is tampering with the evidence immediate steps shall be taken for initiation of a proceeding for cancellation of bail. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)