IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14186 of 2009 PINTU SINGH, SON OF SUKH NANDAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PIYARIA, P.S. GAURICHAK, DISTRICT – PATNA Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.40547 of 2009 LUXMAN SINGH, SON OF SRI NAWAL SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PIYARIA, P.S. GAURICHAK, DISTRICT – PATNA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 20.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged is under sections 341, 323, 307, 427/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners of firing is found incorrect during the course of investigation as the witnesses have not supported the allegation against the petitioners. On the contrary witnesses have stated to the effect that the son of the informant Ram Naresh Singh was holding the gun in his hand and the ladies present there tried to snatch the gun from the son of the informant which accidentally got fired and resulted into injury to the injured. It is further submitted that there is admittedly land dispute between the parties for which mother of the accused, Luxman singh has lodged a case with respect to the alleged occurrence against the informant vide annexure-2 of the application. Learned counsel for the State is not in a position to refute the submissions made on behalf of the petitioners. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Assistant Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in connection with Gauri Chak P.S. Case No. 169 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)