IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.826 of 2011 UMESH SADA Son of Sri Tilak Sada, at present Member Ward No. 5, Nauhatta East Panchayat Village + P.O. + P.S. Nauhatta & District Saharsa … Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the District Magistrate, Saharsa, 2. Circle Officer, Nauhatta, District Saharsa, 3. Block Development Officer, Nauhatta, District Saharsa, 4. Revenue Officer, Saharsa, 5. Hemnarayan Mishra, President Bhagwat Mandir Nirman Committee, Nauhatta, District Saharsa, 6. Satish Chandra Mishra, Secretary, Bhagwati Mandir Nirman Committee, Nauhatta, both Private respondents No. 5 and 6 are sons of late Gunjan Mishra, residentof village + P.O. + P.S. Nauhatta, District Saharsa… … …Respondents ….. 2 17.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Allegedly, a public land was unauthorisedly used for construction of a temple a few years ago in 2005-06 in the Nauhatta Bazar in the District of Saharsa. For removal of encroachment of the present nature, writ petition should have been preferred when the construction was to begin or the same had just begun. In our view, the petitioner would be well advised to seek remedy before the authorities under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act and if he has initiated a proceeding 2 that should be disposed of in accordance with law without any delay. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. SC (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)