IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5693 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 26.10.2009 Baljinder Singh .....Petitioner versus Amrit Singh and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.N.K.Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner impugns the order dated 17.7.2009 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Fatehgarh Sahib, whereby his application for amendment of the plaint, has been dismissed. The petitioner-plaintiff has filed a suit for specific performance on the basis of an agreement to sell dated 13.5.1999. The suit was filed on 30.9.2000. The petitioner now wants to amend the suit so as to incorporate a declaratory relief to set-aside the sale deeds No.868 dated 15.9.1997 and No.1554 dated 19.12.2000. Vide these two sale deeds, a part of the suit land is said to have been sold in favour of defendant Nos.3 & 4. C.R. No.5693 of 2009 (O&M) 2 Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner at some length, I do not find any error of jurisdiction committed by the Civil Court, while passing the impugned order. So far as the sale deed dated 15.9.1997 is concerned, it was executed prior to the `agreement to sell' entered into with the petitioner on 13.5.1999 and appears to have no bearing on the said sale-deed. As regards the second sale deed dated 19.12.2000, the principle of lis-pendense can be invoked in relation thereto, especially when the vendee of such sale deed is already a party to the suit. Dismissed. 26-10-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE