1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No.499 of 2007 (Bharat Laxman Somkuwar v. Prakash Wankhede, Sau. Kavita w/o Prakash Wankhede and State of Maharashtra)) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Shri D.P. Lalwani, Advocate for Applicant. Shri A.J. Khan, Advocate for R- 2. Shri Anoop Parihar, APP for R- 3/State. CORAM : A.H. Joshi, J. DATE : 1st July, 2008 1. The facts, as formed by the Trial Court in paragraphs 9 and 10 of its judgment, for which nexus between the agreement of sale Exhibits 48 and 49 and sale-deed Exhibits 50 and 51 is shown to have been established, are not shown to be contrary on record and erroneous. The findings recorded by the Trial Court are based on evidence and are the most possible conclusions available from the record. 2. The accused has brought on record from the cross-examination of the complainant adequate material to drive the case out of presumption. 3. In absence of proof of liability, there is no ground which can render the judgment of the Trial Court erroneous. 2 4. No indulgence is called for. 5. The application for leave to appeal is rejected. JUDGE Lanjewar