IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1895 of 2008 AKHILESH PRASAD Versus SHAMBHU NATH DWIVEDI & ORS ----------- 2 18/11/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. The prayer for reopening of the evidence for leading some documentary evidence in the facts of this case has been correctly refused, in as much as, for a period of one year, 35 dates were given to the defendant, petitioner for leading his evidence, whereafter the evidence was closed. If that be the attitude of the defendant, petitioner, the court below has not committed any jurisdictional error in refusing such prayer of the petitioner. Accordingly, this application being misconceived is hereby dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J) Abhay Kumar