1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6547 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3843 OF 2001 (Lalit Beniram Harode and others vs. State and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND F.M.REIS, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 17, 2009 Heard Shri Adbe, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Shri Kothari, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent State and Shri Gandhi, learned Counsel for the intervener. Civil Application No.6547/2006 is moved by the petitioners for disposal of the petition. Shri Adbe, learned Counsel for the petiitoners, states that issue involved in the present petition is covered by the decision dated 12.4.2006 rendered by Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No.115/2006, 2 We have considered the contentions of the learned Counsel for the parties and perused the above referred decision. It appears that though some observations are made in the said decision, however, there is no proper adjudication in respect of basic qualification, rules applicable and the relevant procedure. In that view of the matter, it is difficult for us to appreciate the contentions canvassed by the learned Counsel for the petitioners vis-a-vis above referred decision. The civil application is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE khj