1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.516/2008 {Satish Kumar Gautam & Others Versus Bridhi Lal & Others} Date of Order :: 25th August, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Ms. Arti Sharma for Mr. Ashvin Garg for the petitioners BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The defendant-petitioners have preferred this writ petition challenging the impugned order dated 10th December, 2007 passed by the trial court, whereby it has passed an order for re-examination of Smt. Lakkhu Bai by medical board. 3. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner in the light of reasons assigned by the trial court in the impugned order dated 10th December, 2007 and after considering the same, I find that the reasons assigned by the trail court are perfectly justified in the facts and circumstances of the present case. There is no illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error 2 in it so as to interfere with the same under Article 227 of the Constitution. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed in limine. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Misc. Stay Application No. 83/2008 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.516/2008 {Satish Kumar Gautam & Others Versus Bridhi Lal & Others} Date of Order :: 22nd August, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Ms. Arti Sharma for Mr. Ashvin Garg for the petitioners BY THE COURT: Consequent upon the dismissal of writ petition, the stay application, filed therewith, does not survive and the same also stands disposed of. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK