THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.18203 OF 2011 Dated: 30.06.2011 Between: Nammi Raja Rao … Petitioners AND The Commissioner, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation and another … Respondents This Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.18203 OF 2011 O R D E R: Heard Sri P.Veerraju, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri N.Ranga Reddy, the learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent Corporation. The material available on record shows that by notice dated 06.06.2011 issued by the 1st respondent under Sections 450 and 452 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short, ‘the Act’), the petitioner was called upon to show cause as to why the building permission granted on 23.10.2009 should not be revoked under Section 450 of the Act. The petitioner was also called upon to explain as to why action should not be taken against the construction already made. It is stated that in response to the said show-cause notice, the petitioner submitted a detailed explanation dated 15.06.2011. Apprehending that the respondents may take steps for demolition of the structures in question without submitting his explanation, the present writ petition is filed. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner has already submitted his explanation, the learned counsel for the Corporation states that the same would be considered in accordance with law and no coercive steps would be taken till appropriate orders are passed. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner’s explanation dated 15.06.2011 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Till such time, there shall not be demolition of any part of the structures in question. No costs. ___________ G.ROHINI, J JUNE 30, 2011 Note: Issue CC in three days (B/o) Ivd