^l' H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. B1LASPUR PETITIONERS RESPONDENT W.P. (227) No. 3879 of 2008 1. Executive Engineer (O & h4) Dwislon-1, CSPDCL. BKaspur, Dist. BiIaspur-(C.G.) 2. Executive Engineer (Vigilance) CSPDCL. Bilaspur, Dist. Bilaspur-(C.G.) 3. Assistant Engineer, CSPDCL, Bilaspur, Dist. Bilaspur-(C.G.) Versus Project Manager, I.V.R.C.L. Pvt. Ltd., Through- B.P. Sharma, Infrastructure and Project Ltd.. Bilaspur-(C.G.) (Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of tndial Ai?t?earance: Mr. Sunii Otwani, Advocate for the petittoners. Mr. Kasheef Sakeei, Advocate for the rtspondent. ORA.I.,.ORDER (18.02.2010) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard. Return on behalfofthe respondenthas been filed. Mr. Kasheef Sakeel, leamed counsel for the respondtent, submits that in view of the provisions of Regulation 44 of the Chhatttsgarh State Electricity Regulatory CommJssion (Conduct of Business) Regulatlons, 2009, the petitioners have a remedy to file appropriate proceeding bdfore the Commission. He submits tiiat it would be the very efficacious remedy for tfie petltioners in light ofthe relief(s) claimedl in this writ petition. in view of the above, Mr. Sunil Otwani, learned counsel for ttie petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw this petition with (tberty to fite appropriate proceeding before the appropriate authority under RegulaUon 44 of the said Regulations, 2009. Permjssion granted. Accordingly, W.P.(227) No. 3879/2009 is disposect of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted jn favour of the pettttoners. tt is made clear ttiat if either of the parties would be dissatisfied witti the decision of the said aidtiority, they shaii be at liberty to visit this Court once again for the appropriate rellef. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge VA4<