IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 18891 of 2007 Date of Decision: May 5, 2009 M/s Mangal & Kailash ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA Present: Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. C.B. Goel, Advocate, for the respondents. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. In pursuance to the order dated 1.5.2009, Smt. Kailash Rani, proprietor of the petitioner firm has put in appearance. She has pleaded for forgiveness on account of the fact that she did not appreciate and realise the consequences of making incorrect averments in the petition and filing misleading documents. Mr. Rakesh Nehra, learned counsel for the petitioner has also tendered apology on behalf of the petitioner and has requested that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. However, Mr. C.B. Goel, learned counsel for the respondents has insisted that such C.W.P. No. 18891 of 2007 like conduct should not go unpunished. Keeping in view the totality of facts and circumstances, we accept the prayer made by Mr. Nehra. However, the petitioner shall deposit Rs. 5,000/- with respondent Nos. 2 to 4 as costs towards punishment. The record of the case which was got sealed by the Bench Secretary, shall be handed over to the learned counsel for the respondents. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (H.S. BHALLA) May 5, 2009 JUDGE Pkapoor 2