IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 24846 of 2007 Between: S.N.R. Prasad, S/o. Late S. Muddukrishnaiah, O/o. Commissionwer of Income Tax I (CIT-I) Hyderabad, R/o.Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Union of India, Rep by the Secretary to Government, Ministry of Finance, Central Secretariat, North Block, Dept. of Revenue, New Delhi. 2 The Chief Commissionwer of Income Tax and Appellate Authority, Ayakar Bhavan, Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Income Tax and Disciplinary Authority, Ayakar Bhavan, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly writ of certiorari a) call for the records which are connected with OA No. 359of 2003 dated 18-6-2004 and also orders issued vide office Order F.No. CON/CCS.9(37& 38)/CIT-i/2000/1229 dated 2-4-2002 of the disciplinary authority and also orders passed in Office Order F.No. CON/CC.9(37 & 38)/Appeal/1943 dated 20-5-2003 of the Appellate Authority and all consequential proceedings are violative of Art 14 and 16 of constitution of India; b) direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner as Inspector Income Tax with all consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI Counsel for Respondent No.1: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3: MR. B. NARASIMHA SHARMA, ADDL.SC. FOR CENTRAL GOVERNMENT. The Court made the following : ORDER: (Per GM, J) In view of the new developments made in this matter, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a revision before the appropriate forum. Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner to file a revision before the appropriate forum. On filing such a revision, the revisional authority shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law uninfluenced by the observations made by the Tribunal in O.A.No.359 of 2003 dated 18.06.2004. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J Date:17.03.2008 sj