•»'- -•>)' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. fUnder Article 227) No. /2008 PETITIONER Mohd. Mujib S/o. Mohd. Safeeq, OBJECTOR ^ o5...^'^v/ A8ed about 40 years, R/o. •^rtS^' Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) ~ ~ " t^r<Qy-"' o-^" I^SPONDENTS APPLICANT VERSUS 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur(C.G.) ^"" 2] State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3] Vijay K.umar S/o. Late Ramjeevan Lal, Aged about 51 years, R/o. Dharamjaigarh, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1] PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER fS): A,S c't'atpr) al-t/^im i+^ +li/^ ,->rtnnn (^+ln -\- '•-.\ 3))tWWf<-f ~^n 3ft^?T sn*ffq» ^.w^^, •snw'}S, Tafi-'fray stt*»ni;%s7t%' LO i, i^tVII-'-t^ \.^^~)^- ^ ^l^ sn^ffT?^ (f'fs'Ki6') TOIRRWR3BCT i*ii<ji^'lll-( *<W''li ^fezt <h*^r ^TSTRwsn^T SB: HOH. SHRI JU8TICBN.It. AOARWAL 9-11-2009 Shri Maaoj Paranjpc, that he is not aware abouti its withdrawal by the pctiti<tner. Indisputably, a bare Advocate, for fhe petitioner. Shri Rakesh Jha, P^ael Lawyer, for the respondents No. 1 and 2. Shri P.R. Patankar, .Ajdvocate, for the respondent No. 3. Heard. TIus te an unfortun^te petition preferred by the petitioncr against the oider dated 1^-5-2005 suppiessing the Sact that the same oider has already be^n challenged by the petitioner by filing Writ Petition No. 6033/|2005 aad which was subsequenfly wifhdrawn by fhe petitione^ on 16-2-2006 (Annexure R-3/4). Shri Paraajpe, learDJed couasel for the petttioner submits the earlicr challeage aad subsequentty perusal of the order dated 16-2-2006 (Auncxure R-4/3) would reyeal that the order dated 11-5-2005 has already been challenged t>y the pctitioner aad fhe petition was subsequently wifhdrawn w^thout seeldag aay liberty. This fact has been suppressed by the peltitioner while filing the iastant petition, dismiss the instant petitioa. More over, no giouud has been ass^n^d to assail the sanae order ayam., In view of the above, disnussed the petition is liable to be said is hereby Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge »-):TOR 3iS Ip-Btrwt (RI-TiCTra—!;S/95—11/2u08—1.00.000.