1 CR.WP NO.742/2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 912. WP/742/2011 SHAIKH UMAR SHAIKH AZIZ AND ANR [Criminal] V/S THE STATE OF MAH -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.M.A.Latif, Adv., for the petitioner. Smt.S.D.Shelke, APP for State. ... CORAM: A.H.JOSHI AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATE:SEPT., 15th, 2011 1. Learned Advocate for the petitioner was absent yesterday. Even today, when he is called, he is not present. 2. The Petition discloses that the petition is based on hypothesis than on specific facts, which may have propelled the petitioner to file the petition. 3. We, therefore, dismiss the petition. 4. This does not preclude the petitioner from filing fresh petition, if occasion arises. (A.R.JOSHI) (A.H.JOSHI) JUDGE JUDGE agp/742-11crwp