IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10633 of 2010 ABDUL GANI ANSARI SON OF LATE RAHIM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAYA TOLA, JHITKAHI, P.O.- MAHARATHA, P.S. KANTI, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR Versus 1. THE SATAE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, MUZAFFARPUR, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR 3. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, MUZAFFARPUR, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR 4. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, MOTIPUR, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR 5. THE PRINCIPAL, NATIONALIZED MIDDLE SCHOOL, JAGANNATHPUR, ANCHAL MOTIPUR-2, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR 6. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA 7. THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 2 12.07.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that in terms of the letter contained in memo no. 1247 dated 14th February, 2008 the pay-scale of the petitioner as indicated in the aforesaid letter is not correct. The respondent no.2 consequently following the aforesaid letter intimated the petitioner accordingly as per Annexure-2. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the matric trained scale of pay which the petitioner was getting w.e.f. 01.04.1977 and thereafter he got the B.A. trained scale of pay w.e.f. 17.02.1990, however the same have not been taken into consideration presumably that the above necessary endorsements are not made in the service book of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent no.7 submits that in case the necessary communication is received from the respondent no.2 the further authorization for payment of pension and gratuity both shall be issued as per the communication with regard to the pay scale as clamed by the petitioner. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.2 with copy to the respondent no.7. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled without delay. Upon consideration if the representation of the petitioner is accepted the respondent no.2 shall immediately issue necessary communication to the respondent no.7 with regard to the pay scale of the petitioner on which the pensionary benefits shall be settled. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)