IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 15TH MARCH 2010 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1931 RP.No. 266 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.21722/2005 Dated 13/11/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS: PETITIONERS: ---------------------------------- 1. C.K.BALAN, MANAGER, RAMAVILASOM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, CHOKLI, KANNUR. 2. RANJINI.A.V., MUSIC TEACHER, PARASANIKADAVU H.S., KANNUR. 3. CICILIAMMA THOMAS, MUSIC TEACHER, ST.JOSEPH'S H.S.S., KALLODI, MANANTHAVADY, WYNAD DISTRICT. 4. MARY.T.I., DRAWING TEACHER, FR.G.K.M.H.S.KANIYARAM, P.O.MANANTHAVADY, WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.VIJAYAKUMAR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THALASSERY. 3. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KANNUR. 4. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, WYANAD. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------------------------ R.P.No.266 of 2010 in W.P.(C)No.21722 of 2005 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 15th day of March, 2010 ORDER The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to pass appropriate orders regarding the posts claimed by the petitioners in the light of the findings rendered in the judgment. It is pointed out in the review petition that as regards the second petitioner, District Educational Officer, Kannur(3rd respondent), has to take appropriate decision on the request for approval. It is also submitted that in respect of petitioners 3 & 4, the District Educational Officer, Wayand (4th respondent) is to take decision on the approval of appointment. 2. The petitioner has been filed review petition seeking for a modification in the operative portion of the judgment. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the respondent. In the light of the facts pointed out, the operative portion of the judgment is modified as follows:- “There will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate orders regarding the post claimed by R.P.No.266 of 2010 in W.P.(C)No.21722 of 2005 2 the first petitioner and a direction to respondents 3 & 4 to pass orders regarding the post claimed by the petitioners 2, 3 & 4 in the light of the findings rendered above and such orders shall be passed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Depending upon the orders of approval the respective parties will be entitled for consequential monetary benefits also which are to be disbursed within a further period of three months.” The review petition is disposed of. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE skj