C.R.No.2830 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.2830 of 2009. Decided on August 12, 2009. Chaman Lal .. Petitioner VERSUS Neeru. .. Respondent * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI PRESENT Mr.Naresh Kaushal, Advocate, for the petitioner. M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that though the respondent is working in a private School, yet the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, filed by the respondent has been allowed. After hearing counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any ground to interfere in the impugned order as only a sum of Rs.1,000/- per month has been awarded as maintenance pendente lite from the date of application along with litigation expenses of Rs.5,000/-. Even if the respondent is presumed to be earning, the . . . 1 C.R.No.2830 of 2009 said amount deserves to be contributed by the petitioner during the pendency of the case. This revision petition is dismissed (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE August 12, 2009. rka . . . 2