IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32117 of 2008 NAGENDRA PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.8.2008 Heard. Initially it was a police case while Goraul P.S.Case no.3 of 1999 under Section 304B etc IPC. The police on investigation reported the matter not true and gave reasons for false implication of the petitioner and others. In the meantime, the informant filed a petition of complaint by way of protest and the learned C.J.M. heard the parties on that and accepted the final form and by order passed on 6.2.2000 directed holding the enquiry under Section 202 of the Cr.P.C and that resulted in summoning the petitioner and others on the complaint petition. Now the learned Judge while dismissing the prayer for bail has made reference to some paragraphs of the case diary forgetting that the prosecution was ultimately initiated on a petition of protest by way of complaint and not on police report and as such the order was to be confined to the material on the record of the complaint case. The contention is that other accused - 2 - persons have been granted bail as may appear from para-18 of the petition and in support of which a copy of order has been annexed as Annexure-6. Regard being had to the above facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.3,000/-(three thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri M.Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Hajipur in Goraul P.S.Case no.3 of 1999. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )