"7 ^l^ IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETCTION (51 N0.6PJ^../2010 •WGIE BENCH PETITIONER Shiv Lal Yadav, Son of late Santosh Yadav, aged about 51 years (U.T.&.), R/o. Sattigudi Chowk, Bharatkup, Chater'ji 6ali, Darogapara, Raigarh, at pr-esent working in Govt. Hr. Sec. School, Kirodimal Nagar, Raigarh, Distn'ct Raigarh (C.G.), VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1." State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Education Depart- ment, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.6.), o, ^. r^0/'^ 2- Distr'ict Educati" Officer, Raigarh, ./^-"'\.-' ^.^^- r>%S<S°A ^•^y (.^.f. >o/ y District Raigarh {C.G.), ^ 3. Principal, 6ovt. Hr. Secondary School, Kirodimal Naggr, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETETION UN&ER ARTECLE 226 OF THE COUNSTITUTEON OF INDIA XI-HG—78 ^^t '^ll^ici^, afll'M'Ko, fsiCTi-a^< M-£...^l..^.:.^.l.v.l^.200 STI^T 'q^T ('^3^1T) sw^vw h-u* 'cWT STT^T sti+iiqi ^PIIW ^rfe^i 3iT^?i +l-4l(Tf4)T1 HI^^Tt' ^f fg^ Tf^l^l< ^aifinCTi?! r?' ; 21.10.2010 Shri R.S.Patel, counsel forl Sint. Smita Ghai, P.L. for f]ie State. Counsel for fhe pentionerl entitted to benefit of two advaiid having passed D.Ed. examuiatiof own cost. It is subinitted fhat tU petition is no longer res integra decided by fb.e Hon'ble Supren^e Saxeaa Vs. State of M.P. & Orsj subiuits that the petitioner is e increnients on a.ccozuit of be n. after his appoin.tinent at his e issue involved itl the present the same has beea fuiallv Court in the case of Asha (IIIIMPJR i thAt inetat It is furta.er subraitted sirailar view in its onler dated (. 6257/2008. C.ounsel for fhe pen order dated 29..4.2010 passed whereia relying upon the judg case ofAsha Saxena (supra) •an.S, in another Writ Appesl No. 8' issued for consideiation of fhe tacrenients as per circulaT dated^ of Madhya Pradesh, after verific^ petition. fhis Court has also taken a i.2.2009 passed m W.P.iS) No. tioaer further subinits fbat fhe it Writ Appeal N0. 124/2009, ofthe Supreme Coiu-t in fhe the order passed by this Court 7/2009, directions have been ;ase for erant of two advaace 21.9.1974 issued bv the State .tion of fhe facts pleaded. in the Couasel for fhe State subtaits would also be considered on the nits tliat case of thc petitioner sauie liaes. i '^ I-HC—78 ^TS? "4l-4ld'4, yal'y'is, fi|<<ii<i'4,< 311^1 'f^K ('^y^t) 311^1 W Wl* ^T8iTT 3TT^T st)+1!<^ ^RIIW wts sn^i In vjew of above, the pi direction to the i^sTiondent aufhc petitioner for grant of two dated 21.9.1974 issued by the ! vertfication of fhe facts pleaded eiehtweeks fi-oia today. )^;tition is disposed of with a Irities to decide the claim of fhe advaijice inci^iueats as per circular ptate of Madhya Pradesh after u|i fhe petition wifbia a period of q)l<4l<rl41^ 'RTTR;ff ^ ^^t ^fsR^R ^; sifin 3ii^?i Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge