IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6723 of 2009 UDAY NATH SHARMA, S/O- LATE SUMER SHARMA , RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O. – AMAON, P.S. CHAINPUR, DISTRICT – KAIMUR (BHABUA) Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, BIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER-CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER MAGADH ELECTRIC SUPPLY AREA, GAYA. 3. THE ELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, BHABUA, DISTRICT – KAIMUR 4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTS, MAGADH ELECTRIC SUPPLY AREA, GAYA. 5. THE ADMINISTRATOR, G.P.F. TRUST (HEADQUARTER), BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,PATNA. ----------- 2. 22.06.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-Board. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite sanction for payment of the provident fund dues as per Memo No. 700(Accounts) dated 6th of may 2005 as contained in Annexure-1, the petitioner has not received the dues towards the provident fund despite persistent request. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievances petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 2. In case such representation is filed alongwith certified copy of the - 2 - present order within a period of four weeks, respondent no. 2 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. Upon such consideration, if the representation is disposed of in favour of the petitioner, the above respondent shall simultaneously issue necessary orders so that the grievances of the petitioner with regard to the payment of the provident fund as sanctioned by the respondent no. 4 could be paid to him without further delay alongwith statutory interest. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)