IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 23.07.2010 COCP No.1692 of 2009 Malkiat Singh ...Petitioner Versus Bhupinder Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. S.K.Bawa, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Sahu, Addl. AG, Punjab, for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate, for respondent Nos.3 and 4. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The petitioner earlier filed a writ petition before this Court, which was withdrawn on 22.01.2006, when counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4 made a statement that the said respondents shall stick to the alignment of the water mentioned in order dated 12.4.2006. The stand of the petitioner was that he has no objection, if his house/electric meter/transformer was not disturbed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that the alignment of water course undertaken by the official respondents has disturbed his possession. He has shown certain photographs, but none of the photograph or the contention relate to disturbance to his house/electric meter/transformer. In view of the above, I do not find that any case for initiation of contempt proceedings is made out. Dismissed. 23.07.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE