IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE Ch.S.R.K. PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO : 15682 of 2004 Between: Smt.Munni Ghanaram, W/o Ghanaram, Nava Durga Money Lender Shop, Shop No.8-113, Srinivasa Nagar, Chintal Shapur Nagar, Ranga Reddy District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, Jeedimetla Police Station, Ranga Reddy District 2 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to for the reasons stated in the "Telegram" dated 30-08-2004 send by the Petitioner herein this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an Order, direction, or a writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the Respondents herein to produce the husband of the Petitioner, namely, Ghanaram and his brother, namely, Dewaram, before this Court who were illegally taken away by the Station House Officer, Jeedimetla Police Station and detained in Jeedimetla Police Station, Cyberabad since 27-08-2004 and set them at liberty forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner: TELEGRAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court at the admission stage made the following: ORDER: (By the Hon’ble Sri Justice G. Bikshapathy) The telegram issued by one Smt. Munni Ghanaram was registered as Taken Up W.P.No.15682 of 2004. 2. It was alleged in the telegram that her husband-Ghanaram, who was running a money lending shop, was called by the Police in connection with the pledge of gold items and thereafter, his whereabouts are not known. Therefore, the telegram was issued requesting this Court to interfere with the matter. 3. A counter has been filed on behalf of the respondents stating that the husband of the petitioner was called for to the Police Station for enquiry on 27-08-2004. During the course of enquiry, the husband of the petitioner denied the purchase of stolen ornaments and as no clues are forthcoming to establish the involvement of the husband of the petitioner, he was let off from the Police Station after one hour and that the husband of the petitioner was moving freely and conducting his business. 4. In view of the statement in the counter-affidavit filed by the Police, we find no ground to proceed further with the matter. 5. The writ petition is accordingly closed. ____________________ (G. BIKSHAPATHY, J) Date:09-09-2004 __________________ (Ch.S.R.K. PRASAD, J) ghn To 1. The Station House Officer, Jeedimetla Police Station, Ranga Reddy District 2. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District 3 Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Home, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad(o.u.t.) 4 Two CD copies.