IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14784 of 2009 1. DR.SUMAN BALA W/O DR. SHARWESHWAR KUMAR R/O AROGYA HOSPITAL, SUBHASH CHOWK, HAJIPUR, P.S. HAJIPUR, DISTT.- VAISHALI Versus 1. BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN BAILEY ROAD, PATNA, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN 2. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 3. THE GENERAL MANAGER, TIRHUT AREA ELECTRICITY BOARD MUZAFFARPUR 4. THE ELECTRICAL SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, MUZAFFARPUR CIRCLE MUZAFFARPUR 5. THE ELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER HAJIPUR 6. THE ASSISTANT ELECTRICAL ENGINEER HAJIPUR ----------- 4. 14.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent Bihar State Electricity Board. The premises in question are stated to be Arogya Hospital, Subhash Chouk, Hajipur, a medical centre run by the petitioner. She had an approved connected load of 5 K.W. An inspection on 15.1.2009 revealed an actual connected load of 5.86 K.W. Each case of excess load shall have to be considered on its own facts, when the amount of excess load found can be a distinguishing factor. In the present case, the excess load has been found as .86 K.W. The petitioner is started to have filed objection to the provisional assessment under Section 126(3) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and which is still pending. Learned counsel for the Board submits that by reason of the interim order dated 14.12.2009 restraining co-ercive action, the petitioner has stopped payment of 2 current charges also. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no bills have been raised by the Board after the interim order. Without going into that question, in the nature of the controversy, where the dispute relates to an excess load of .86 K.W. only, the Board shall forthwith raise a bill on the petitioner for all arrears assessing the consumption in accordance with law at 5 K.W. The petitioner is bound to pay the same within a maximum period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the bill. If she desires any installment on the same, it is expected that the Board shall consider the same in a manner that even while it continues to receive revenue, the petitioner has the benefit of electricity supply. If the petitioner does not deposit the arrears of charges on basis of such a bill to be raised by the Board in the manner as indicated, the Board shall be at liberty to disconnect supply. Let the objection of the petitioner be disposed off in accordance with law whereafter the parties shall be abide by the final assessment that may be made. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)