1 PIL- 75.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 75 OF 2011 (Laxman Kashinath Sable VS The State of Maharashtra and anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mrs. Asha D. Rakh, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. K.G. Patil, A.G.P. for the respondent-State Mr. M.M. Patil Beedkar, Advocate for respondent no.2 ... CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 07.12.2011 P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. It is the contention of the petitioner that the proposed shopping complex is being constructed on a public road. 3. In the affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent-Municipal Council, it is categorically stated that the shopping complex is being constructed on C.T.S. no. 1212 A and that the same is not a public road. It is also submitted that the plan for the said shopping complex is sanctioned by the Town Planning Department. 2 PIL- 75.2011 4. In that view of the matter, we do not find any merit in the Petition. Rejected. Sd/- Sd/- arp [M. T. JOSHI, J. ] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]