IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27570 of 2008 JAI NANDAN SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 6.8.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Though in the F.I.R. the offence has been under section 395 IPC but the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a civil dispute relating to the title of the land. The land in question has been purchased by the petitioner from the rightful owner and the alleged occurrence was for looting the crops. Considering the above facts, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. If the petitioner ( Jai Nandan Sharma) surrenders within four weeks from today, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar (Aurangabad) in Daudnagar P. S. Case no.188/07 subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. shahid (Mridula Mishra, J)