IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-32181 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: November 03, 2011 Balwinder Kaur & another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate, for the petitioners. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with the averment that petitioners got married. 2. It has been asserted in the petition that petitioners are major and marriage is legal, however, is being opposed by respondent No.4, Ashok Kumar, who is cousin brother of petitioner No.1. 3. At this stage, petitioner No.1, Balwinder Kaur has appeared in person, as identified by her counsel Mr. S.K. Arora, Advocate, and states that she has been defrauded by petitioner No.2, Crl. Misc. No. M-32181 of 2011 [2] Kuldip Singh, by way of projecting that he was un-married. 4. It transpires that petitioner No.2, Kuldip Singh was already married and has two children, and therefore, could not have approached petitioner No.1 for marriage. 5. Be that as it may, learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the petition. 6. Dismissed as withdrawn. (AJAI LAMBA) November 03, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?