M ..^ <" ^ IN TOE HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE AT BIU^RJR(C.G) MISCELLANB3US APPEAL NoJ&^L' 2004 w AWELLANT (2LAIMANT RESPONDENT ^ION-APPUCANT ^ ^^ fS^ ^y ^y ^^- y>" ^ ^felonBensl) Bafaram Verma S/oKejau Ram Verma Aged about-45 years (2) Kusum Ba! W/o Salaram ^smia, Aged ^ about/42 y^rss/ ^ both are R/o ViUa^- Bana^ P.S-Kharora, Dlstt- Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS (1) Dhanesh Yadav S/o Jagat Ram fadav / R/o - VJJI- Umada, Milan Chowk^ In front ofCiewangan Halar MilJ/BhiJai3, Durg/ C.G Pr^ent adress- Sandeep Kr. Goenka, R/o i.l.G-AQ, M.P. Housing bc^rd cotonyjatibandhf Raipur, C.G. (2) Sandeep Kr. Goenka, R/o LI.G-40, M.P. Housmg board cdonyjafibandhy Rai'pur, C.G. (3) Jhe New India Insursnce Company, ^ through &.M- Kutchhari Chowfc, Madina Manjij, Rajpur, Kstt- Ralpyr(C.G.) (4) Keju Ram Vemia S/o Sukh Ram Verma R/o ^ Village- Bana, P-S-Kharora, Distt- Raipur(C.G.5 (5) T^e New India Insurance Company, ^ through D.M- Kutchhari Chowk, Madina Nanjit, Raipur, CNstt- Raipur(C.G.) Mtscelianeous Appea! under/sectbnl73 Motor Vehk;{e Act 19^ ^ LOKADALAT Chhattisaarh Hiah CourtCampus. Bilaspur Case Appellant Versus Respondent No..iyLiM,-4^-(4of ^^& pcxlqiY dft^ ^ -P vyv^ Q^je5 ^t?t— p ^O^-c.^ ^oJlo^ O^ cfO. ^;,a: .;^ App^ipt wi^by ^,^;^li7,^^^.^,^^, ^,,,,-,,,^,,,, ^dv^^ate, Respon^DtM^llri^ AWAjlD (Passedon d?l-\-^o^ > Parties file a compromise petition. The terms are just. We hereby record the compromise and pass an award in terms of compromise, and order that appellant / respondent shall pay to respondent / appellant a sum of Rs.^r00^000 /- by way of compensation together with interest @ -$^——^—oC% per annum from -^ <^ ^ tn ^ ^ c< —Sd/- 1 L.C.BHADOO Judge-LokAdalat High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur ——^^ ^ Sd/- Member- Lok Adaiat High Cour^ofChliattisgarh' Bilaspur ,_„...._-._^..._.-^,„.„.„.,..