In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan At Jaipur Bench, Jaipur O R D E R In S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.964/2010 Chandan Vs. The State of Rajasthan Date Of Order :: 9th February, 2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.N. Bhandari Mr. Ashish Chouhan, for the petitioner. Mr. Laxman Meena, Public Prosecutor. Mr. Neeraj Sharma, for complainant. .......... Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused record of the case. It is stated that main allegation exists against Tulsi and Dwarka, thus, petitioner be granted bail. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant opposed the bail application and submit that petitioner actively participated in causing of offence under section 302 of IPC that too against a person belonging to downtrodden society. Deceased was killed in brutal manner, thus, petitioner be not granted bail. After considering the rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that the petitioner does not deserves to be enlarged on bail. The bail application is accordingly dismissed. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for liberty to file fresh bail application on framing of the charge against the petitioner. Liberty aforesaid is granted. (M.N. Bhandari),J. VS Shekhawat/- Jr. P.A. S33