IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 1564 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 24th May, 2010. Kanwaljit Ghuman Petitioner through Mr. G.S.Ghuman, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Mr. B.S.Chahal, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate for UT, Chandigarh. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner was working as a Lecturer-cum-Associate Professor in the Government College for Girls, Sector 11, Chandigarh. Though the writ petition seeks implementation of the decision dated 22nd January, 2010 taken by the Punjab Government, which has since been quashed by this Court vide order dated 29.03.2010 rendered in CWP No. 2247 of 2010 [Kuldip Singh v State of Punjab & Ors.], the petitioner's main prayer regarding enhancement in the age of retirement deserves to be considered by the State of Punjab in the light of the directions issued by this Court vide order dated 06.04.2010 in CWP No. 16370 of 2009 [Parmod Shankar Joshi & Ors. v State of Punjab & Ors]. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the decision rendered in Parmod Shankar Joshi's case [supra]. The ad-interim order dated 01.02.2010 shall accordingly stand vacated. Dasti. May 24, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE