:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE SECOND APPEAL NO.101 OF 200 SECOND APPEAL NO.101 OF 200 SECOND APPEAL NO.101 OF 2001 WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1681 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1681 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1681 OF 2007 WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.179 OF 2001 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.179 OF 2001 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.179 OF 2001 Pandurang Digambar Ratnaparkhi ...Appellant. v. Ramabai Laxman Sangolkar & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.S.S.Patwardhan , adv. for the Appellant. Mr.R.S.Datar , adv. for the Respondent No.1. Mr.Chatur G. Patil, adv. for the Respondent No.2. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 27th August, 2008. DATE: 27th August, 2008. DATE: 27th August, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Appeal is not board, taken on board at the request of the learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the parties have filed ’Consent Terms’ marked ’X’ for Identification. It is duly signed by the power of attorney holder for the appellant and by the respondent nos.1 and 2. It also bears signatures of the advocates for the appellant and the respondent nos.1 and 2. Advocate for the respondent no.2 makes a statement that he is specifically authorised to sign the ’Consent Terms’ as per the affidavit marked ’Y’. The respondent no.1 is also present before the Court and the contents of the Consent Terms are explained to her in Marathi and she admits the same. :2: 2. Second Appeal stands disposed off as per the ’Consent Terms’. 3. As the appeal itself is disposed off, civil application no.1681 of 2007 and civil application no.1791 of 2001 do not survive and stand disposed off accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)