IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.99 of 2000 ARUN KUMAR CHOUDHARY Versus STATE BAANK OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 3. 6.7.2009 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the First Appeal was dismissed for non- compliance of the peremptory order dated 19.2.1999 for not depositing the deficit court fee within two months. The reason for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 19.2.1999 is stated to be on account of the appellant- petitioner suffering from hepatitis (jaundice), for which he remained under treatment of a Doctor from 5.4.1999 to 11.1.2000, for which the Medical Certificate has also been annexed. On a consideration of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, F.A. No.644 of 1998 is directed to be restored to its original file subject to the deposit of the deficit court fee within a period of two weeks from today. The application is, accordingly, allowed subject to the aforesaid condition. VPS (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)