IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 3687 of 2008 Between: Cine Prekshakula Viniyoga Darula Sangham, Flat No.B-002 Prasad Enclave, Barkatpura, Hyderabad-027 rep.by its Secretary Sri M.Venugopal Rao, S/o.Kishan Rao ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra pradesh, rep.by Chief Secretary General Administration Department, At AP., Secretariat Hyderabad 2 The Government of Andhra pradesh, rep.by Special Chief Secretary, Home (GEN.A) Department, at AP secretariat, Hyderabad 3 The AP State Film Development Corporation, rep.by its Managing Director, Masab Tank, Hyderabad 4 The AP Film Chamber of Commerce, Hyderabad rep.by its President Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad 5 The Director General of Police, AP at Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the G.O.Ms.No.175 dated 2.4.2005 , G.O.Ms.No.95 dated 31.5.2005 issued repealing the terms of the G.O.Ms.No.175 dated 2.4.2005 and (III) the consequential G.O.Ms.No.269 dated 16.12.2005 of the Home (General-A) Department, Government of Andhra pradesh, and quash the same by declaring them as illegal, improper unsustainable and harmful to the general cinema viewers and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.G.LNARASIMHA RAO & ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION GP FOR HOME MR. K. VENKATESH, The Court made the following : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA W.P.NO. 3687 OF 2008 ORDER: (Per Anil R. Dave, HCJ) Learned advocate Sri G.L. Narasimha Rao appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner would like to file a comprehensive representation so as to bring it to the notice of the Government that the Government Orders referred to in the writ petition are not in the interest of the public at large. In the circumstances, the comprehensive representation shall be made by the petitioner within two weeks from today. If such a representation is made, the 2nd respondent shall consider the same in accordance with law and decide it within eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. In view of the above direction, the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. ________________ ANIL R. DAVE CJ _____​______________________ GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA J Dt.22.2.2008 KR ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Government of Andhra pradesh, rep.by Chief Secretary General Administration Department, At AP., Secretariat Hyderabad 2 The Government of Andhra pradesh, rep.by Special Chief Secretary, Home (GEN.A) Department, at AP secretariat, Hyderabad 3 The AP State Film Development Corporation, rep.by its Managing Director, Masab Tank, Hyderabad 4 The AP Film Chamber of Commerce, Hyderabad rep.by its President Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad 5 The Director General of Police, AP at Hyderabad 6. 2 CCs to GP for General Administration, High Court Building, Hyderabad. 7. 2 CCs to GP for Home, High Court Building, Hyderrabad. 8. 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK}