IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2009 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1931 FAO.No. 8 of 2008() ------------------------------ AS.44/2002 of SUB COURT, PALA OS.168/1998 of MUNSIFF COURT, PALA .................... APPELLANT (S)/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT: --------------------------------------------------- LISSY JOSEPH, AGED 37 YEARS, VARACHERIL HOUSE, LALAM VILLAGE, LALAM KARA, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.N.PURUSHOTHAMA KAIMAL RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: ----------------------------------- MATHEW VARGHESE, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O. VARKEY, MANNAKKATTU, KANIYAKATTU KARA, PULIYANNOOR VILLAGE FROM KALLIKKATTU, VALLICHIRA VILLAGE, VALLICHIRA KARA, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. ADV.MR.P.C.HARIDAS THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/03/2009, ALONG WITH EXSA NO. 1 OF 2009 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.Raman & P.S.Gopinathan, JJ. ================================== F.A.O.No.8 of 2008 and EX.SA.1 of 2009 ================================== Dated this the 25th day of March 2009. JUDGMENT Gopinathan, J. The parties were sent for mediation and it is reported that the matter is settled through mediation. 2. Today when the appeals came up for hearing, it is submitted that the compromise arrived between the parties is recorded and signed by the parties. On going through the compromise, it is signed by the parties, except some of the respondents in Ex.SA.1 of 2009. However, since the dispute is settled by the parties and no further relief is sought, we find no reason for not recording the same. In the above circumstances, recording the -:2:- compromise arrived, both the appeals are dismissed. The compromise would form part of the decree. No costs. P.R.Raman, Judge. P.S.Gopinathan, Judge. css/