IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24343 of 2009 DEOCHANDRA PRASAD VERMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 8.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against this petitioner is similar to that of accused persons. In this connection he referred to the decision reported in 1993 Cr.Law Journal 938. It is not better than wasting precious time of this Court as petitioner’s case was distinguished in the earlier rejection order passed by this Court only on 24.2.2009. This petitioner was only armed with tangi which only is sharp cutting weapon though for khanti also it is said that it has some sharp-edged portion but way of use of that portion is to dig there, without specification for its blow it never can be presumed that the same was used. This attempt for bail on behalf of the petitioner is not appreciated. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI