A ^i? IN THE HIGH GOURT OFJUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR 'PELLANT ^ ^"s' . €':C'X'f ^tftx-" p(8W o&' ®^dw .>EiO. ^ M.A.NO. 4 /2011 's Rajat Enterprises Partner Company fhrough Partnership Shri Mahavir Kumar Golchha S/o Late Kanwar lal Ji Golchha, R/o Naveen Bajar Raipur, Tah 8s Distt Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RE^PONDENTS: 7 ~~ ?h ^ 1)^- Smt. Hemadi W/0 Shri Goverdhan Manjhi, R/o Gohrapadar, Police Station Deobhog, Tahsil Gariyaband, District Raipur (C.G.) 2.)WJ> Murli Ram S/o Domuram Rawat, Occupation Truck Driver, R/o ViUage and Post Gohrapadar, Police Station Deobhog, Tahsil Gariyaband, Distriet Raipur (C.G.) 3^-14^- The United India Insurance Company' Limited, City Branch Office No.2, Raipur Through : Divisional Manager Divisional Office, Kutcheri Chowk, Jail Road, Raipur(C.G.) MEMOOF APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULE lOFCIVIL PROCEDURE GODE ^ a Bl • ^SssSfa iGi It 1 M/s Rajat Partner CoiTipany nterprisi Kw APPEALL Smt. Hemadi and others. ;R ORDER 43 RULE 1 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDUR! iSinGie >1-< ;t : Noneforthe appeiiant. oji 1st dav of March, 201! The matter is called twice. On both occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appeilant. The appeliant may not be interested in prosecuting the rnatter. 2. in view of the above, the appeai is dismtssed for vi'ant of prosecutjon. ^—•'' N.K. Agarwal Judge •-a^ - - — /-' r