1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.10687 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 C.Arulanantham ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Annasalai, Nandanam, Chennai-35. 2. The Executive and Administrative Officer, Madurai Housing Board Branch, Ellis Nagar, Madurai-625 016. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the order in Lr.No.M.H.33/H33/SecVI/96 dated 18.02.2011 and its consequential proceedings on the file of the second respondent and to quash the same as illegal, unjust, unconstitutional and without jurisdiction. For Petitioner ... Mr.S.A.Ajmalkhan For Respondents ... Mr.S.Nagarajan * * * * * O R D E R This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the order in Lr.No.M.H.33/H33/SecVI/96 dated 18.02.2011 and its consequential proceedings on the file of the second respondent and to quash the same as illegal, unjust, unconstitutional and without jurisdiction. 2. Heard Mr.S.A.Ajmalkhan, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Nagarajan, learned Counsel, who takes notice for the respondents. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The petitioner states that he has purchased a house from the second respondent and he has paid all the dues payable to the house. However, in the impugned notice, a sum of Rs.1,21,678/- has been demanded. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner has given a representations https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 to the second respondent on 15.03.2011 and 28.06.2011. Since the representations have not been considered so far, the writ petition has been filed by the petitioner. 5. The learned Counsel for the respondents states that the authority will consider the representations of the petitioner on their own and in accordance with law. 6. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the second respondent is directed to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 15.03.2011 and 28.06.2011 on their own merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's claim and the authority shall consider the same on their own merits. 7. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Consequently the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No Costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl. Side) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar (C.S) To: 1. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Annasalai, Nandanam, Chennai-35. 2. The Executive and Administrative Officer, Madurai Housing Board Branch, Ellis Nagar, Madurai-625 016. + 1 cc to Mr.S.A.Ajmal Khan, Advocate, SR No.32773 W.P.(MD)No.10687 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 20.09.2011 ssl/ts RJ/10.10.11 2p/4c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/