THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 20481 OF 2008 O R D E R: The petitioner is the Upa-Sarpanch of Thogarrai Grampanchayat, Karimnagar District. Eight members of the Grampanchayat placed a requisition before the Revenue Divisional Oﬃcer, the 1 st respondent herein, on 29.8.2008, with a request to convene a meeting of the Grampanchayat, to take up a motion of No-conﬁdence, against the petitioner. They have also enclosed a copy of the proposed resolution. After verifying the requisition, the 1st respondent issued notice dated 6.9.2008, in Form- IV, prescribed under the relevant Rules, framed under G.O.Ms.No.200 dated 28.4.1998. The petitioner challenges the notice dated 6.9.2008, stating that it is contrary to rules. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj. Except stating that the impugned notice is contrary to the rules, the petitioner is not able to point out as to how it is illegal. The rules require that the 1st respondent can initiate action, only when a notice in prescribed form is delivered to him. The notice signed by majority of the members is presented to him personally, by two members. The copy of the proposed resolution was also enclosed. Section 245 of the A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, read with the relevant rules, mandates that the notice to convene a meting, shall be issued in Form-IV. The form itself insists that the proposed resolution shall be enclosed. It is not in dispute that the proposed resolution was enclosed to the impugned notice. No defect as to the time gap is pointed out. Viewed from any angle, it cannot be said that the impugned notice is defective. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ 19th September 2008 PAN