IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY FRIDAY, THE 14TH JANUARY 2011 / 24TH POUSHA 1932 WA.No. 1533 of 2010() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.20119/2010 Dated 29/06/2010 .................... APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS : -------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR, PIN-680 003. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, MUKUNDAPURAM, THRISSUR. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MADAIKONAM, THRISSUR-680 712. BY G.P. SRI.MOHAMMED RAFIQ RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. ROY.P.J., PORATHOOKKARAN HOUSE, MADAYIKONAM P.O., THRISSUR-680 712. 2. SURESH, CHEMBARA HOUSE, MADAIKONAM.P.O., THRISSUR-680 712. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JJ. .................................................................... Writ Appeal No.1533 of 2010 .................................................................... Dated this the 14th day of January, 2011. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. After hearing the Government Pleader and after going through the impugned judgment, we do no find any ground to interfere with the judgment because the matter is remanded to the District Collector for reconsideration. Government Pleader specifically challenged the adverse comments and observations made by the learned Single Judge about the Government. We do not think there is any need to consider the correctness of the feelings expressed by the Judge about the attitude of the Government. However, these observations need not weigh with the District Collector for deciding the matter. Writ Appeal is accordingly dismissed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge BHABANI PRASAD RAY Judge pms