IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No 338 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ VARSHABEN PARESHBHAI JOSHI Versus PARESHBHAI NAVINCHANDRA JOSHI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Appeal from Order No. 338 of 2000 MR SP HASURKAR for Petitioner No. 1 MR BS PATEL for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA Date of decision: 25/09/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT Learned counsel Shri S.P.Hasurkar does not press this appeal. However, he requested that as and when the appellant mother makes an application before the learned Judge for meeting her minor daughter Vidhi occasionally then the same may be considered by the learned Judge. It is always open to the appellant, who is mother of minor daughter Vidhi to make such application before the learned Judge. I am sure that as and when such application is made, learned Judge irrespective of his order will consider the same in proper perspective and decide her application in accordance with law. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid observations. (B.J.Shethna, J.) *Pvv