KPP -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 130 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3032 OF 2005 The Secretary, Mahamahind International Bhammadoot Society & Anr. ... Appellants vs. Smt. Vidya Anantrao Manjramkar and another ..Respondents Mr. M.S. Karnik for the appellants. Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar for respondent No.1. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE: JULY 26, 2011. P.C. By way of this Letters Patent Appeal, the appellant management has challenged the order of the learned single Judge dated 27th April, 2006 passed in Writ Petition No. 3032 of 2005. By the impugned order, the learned single Judge has allowed the writ petition filed by the first respondent teacher holding that the first respondent is entitled to back wages. Liberty was given to the institution to get the reimbursement of the amount of back wages from the State Government. KPP -2- The services of the first respondent were terminated by the appellant which termination order was challenged by the first respondent before the School Tribunal. The School Tribunal allowed the appeal but denied the back wages. The order of reinstatement was not challenged by the management. The first respondent herein challenged the order of the School Tribunal in so far as denial of back wages to the first respondent. As pointed out earlier, the learned single Judge has granted back wages to the first respondent. 2. During the pendency of this appeal, it seems that the appellant had applied for reimbursement of the amount and the Court is informed that the same has already been reimbursed by the State Government. During the pendency of this appeal, out of the total amount deposited by the appellant management, the first respondent has withdrawn 50 per cent of the amount. In the meanwhile, respondent No.1 has received full amount from the State Government towards back wages and the 50 per cent of the amount which first respondent No.1 has withdrawn from the Registry has already been re-deposited with the Registry. Since the Appeal has become infructuous, the same is disposed of as having become infructuous. In view of the same, the entire amount which is lying with the Registry can be withdrawn by the appellant unconditionally in view of KPP -3- the fact that the first respondent has already received full back wages from the State Government. Appeal disposed of accordingly. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.