IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6570 of 2011 DHANANJAY KUMAR @ DHANANJAY SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------------ 02. 09.03.2011 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 302/34 of the I.P.C. In the F.I.R. petitioner was named along with others being seen fleeing away from the place of occurrence. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that during investigation the accusation was fond false and petitioner was not sent up for trial though two other accused persons were chargesheeted but subsequently the cognizance has been taken against the petitioner also. Dr. Indiwar Kumari, learned counsel for the State submits that on perusal of the materials on record learned Magistrate has taken cognizance, hence the petitioner should not be given privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the fact that accusation was found false during investigation and the nature of circumstantial accusation in the F.I.R., let the petitioner namely Dhananjay Kumar @ Dhananjay Singh, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below - 2 - within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in connection with Ranitalab P.S. Case No. 35 of 2008. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)