IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1832 of 2006 GIRDHARI SHARMA Versus INSHRATUN NISHA & ORS ----------- 10 10.11.2008 No one appears for the petitioner. Counsel for the opposite party No.1 is present. Earlier also the counsel for the petitioner did not choose to appear on 15.9.2008. This Civil Revision application infact has incompetent in as much the same has stood dismissed as against opposite party no. 2 and 4(i) to 4(iv) due to noncompliance of preemptory order of this Court dated 29.7.2008 and 25.8.2008. In view of the fact that the operation of the judgment and decree directing eviction had not been stayed while admitting this application for final hearing and no interest has been shown by the counsel for the petitioner to press this application, this Court has no option but to dismiss this case with an observation that there is now no impediment for the opposite party no. 1 in executing the decree. With the aforesaid observations, this Civil Revision application is dismissed. . Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)