•^- \0..'! S'^M^ [^ a^?^^^ ^at^Lt K£%Cj-J ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURBAT BILASPUR fC.G.j WRIT PETITION N0. 4-^^ /2005 PETITIONER RESPONDBNTS .** ^.."••^>'' ..-• ^•::Tt.'.--""" ^"e^^y ^ ..^/\.^ ,^<^^<>' ey Smt. Manjulata Shukla, W/o. Shri Rajesh Shukla, Aged about 29 years, Occupation - Service, Presently working as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, Govt. Priinary School, Joratal, Janpad Panchayat Kawardha (Kabirdham), District Kawardha (C.G.). VBRSUS v^^..- ^yx /2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Rural Development, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kawardha (Kabirdham), Distt. Kawardha (C.G.) WRiT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDiA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRTT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CBRTIORARI. PROHIBITION AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WMTS. ORDER OR ORDERS. DIRECTION ORDIRECTIONS. I— •-y)./ COURT OF CHHATTISQARH AT BILASPUR • SjNGLEBENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATiSN K. AGNiHOTRL_^ WRITPETmO_N_N0..43IO^F2008 Petitloner : Smt. Manjulata ShyRla Versus ResDondents State of Chhattisgarh and others > 1:\ •Present : Nr. Ashish Shrivastava, counsel for the petltjoner. Mr. Utkarsh Verma, Deputy Government Advocate for the State/respondent No.1. None appears for respondente No.2 and 3. (Passed on 28thDayofFebruary, 20Q7) The petltloner whjle worklog as Sniksha Kartnl Grade-lil in Government Primary Schooi, Donganya, under the Janpad Panchayat, Lorml was transferred to Janpad Panchayat, Kawardha, vide order datsd 21-07-2005 (P-2). The petitioner josned the new place of postlng at Kawardha, but, thereafter, vide Impugned order dated 23-08-200S (P-6), the transfer of the petitioner from Lorml to Kawardha was cancelled, The petitioner Impygns the order dated 23-08-2005 (P-6). 2. This Court, vlde interim order datecl 30-09-2035, directed that th@ and operation of the impugned order dated 23-08-2005 (P-6) shall remain stayed tlli the next date of hearing. 3. Wlth the passage of time, the wrlt petltion has become Infructyous, to which iearned counse! appearing for the State/respondent No.1 has no objection. 4. . Thus, the writ petition Is dismlssed as having become jnfructuous. No order as to costs. Sd7- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gopat