IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR rCHHATTISGARHI WRIT PETITION N0. ^3 ^--3 OF 2005 PETITIONER : Alok Zachariah Son of Late Shri K. G, Zachariah, aged about 46 years, Posted as Assistant Grade-III, in the office of District Malaria Office, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS .^- ./^. .M) '/-^/ / w. y^y / ^y 2. 3. t'9aa2.^' tsr[y --r-Z-)-CW^ -T^- ^1JIJ-I?C fctf^ &. 3. B^l>ua State ofChhattisgarh, through: the Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). The District Malaria Officer, Composite Building, Room No. 11, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). Dr. S. K. Tiwari, Son of not known, aged about 57 years, District Malaria Officer, Composite Building, Room No. 22, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION ETC. -1_. ^u z ^ ^t.Ko, 4 c^\^ \<c^wc^',<^ ^^ ^-^ lcl^^J~^<^ l''^^v^~ i<A k^ BSTT7~TT'—^^—^— .€ ^ ^B<?» ^eha Bha-fcaagaa?* Assisfcaafc ©VQ/^I^S. ^©stedi.r* th@'.0f;f|..a£-..-.o.€.: €A^M..§ rg^@i."@aw®»^£t£NI^ Sttpeci.,stendenfei S@i^»s^0a2^ Mstri^t Koriya (c.G^) < (^ H1GHCOURT,OF^C,HHATTJS©ARH,AT.BILASPUR Petitloner PETSTION OF 200S Alok Zachariah Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others ^ Mr. Bhaskar Payashl, counsei for the petitioner. Mr. Utkarsh Verma, Deputy Goysmment Advocate for the Stete/respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Sameer Behar, counsel for respondent No.3. None appears for respon-dent No.4. & ORDER (Passed on 28th DayofFebruary,.2007) The petltloner while worklng as Asslstant Grade-'lll in the office of District Malaria Officer, BiSaspyr has been transferred to the office of Civll Surgeon-cutn-HospitaS Superintendent, Baikunthpur, vide order 14-11-2005 (P-1). The Impugns the ordsr 14-11-2005 (P-1). 2. This Court, victe interim order dated 03-12-2005, granted stay of the impugned order 14-11-2005-(P-1) tili the next date of hearing. 3. With the passage of tsme, the writ petstion has become Infructuous, to whlch learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents No.1 and 2 has no objectlon. 4. Thus, the writ petition Is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gopai