IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. S. NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 2150 OF 2007 Between: The District Co-operative Marketing Society Limited, Ranga Reddy district, Represented by its Business Manager, Sri Gopal Reddy. … Petitioner V/s. Mumtaz Begum w/o Nizamuddin & 21-Ors. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : M/s. N.Vasudeva Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : None appeared THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. S. NARAYANA * * * * * CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 2150 OF 2007 O R D E R : Heard the counsel. 2. Certain third parties, in the light of the subsequent execution of gift deeds are sought to be impleaded as plaintiffs in the suit and the said application was allowed. Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is preferred by the first defendant. 3. Sri N. Vasudeva Reddy, the learned counsel representing the Revision Petitioner placed strong reliance on the decision in RAMESH CHAWLA V/s. N. SRIHARI AND ORS [1], and MAJOR P.T. CHOUDARY V/s. MOHAMMED ABDUL BASHEER KHAN AND ORS[2]. 4. It is no doubt true that the doctrine of lispendence may cause some hardship. It is also true that after alienation is made the original parties may not be much interested and the alienees may have to come on record. But however, in the light of the facts and circumstances, the parties are given liberty to agitate their rights by way of separate suits if they are so advised. 5. With the aforesaid liberty, the order under challenge is hereby set aside. 6. The Civil Revision Petition is hereby allowed. No costs. __________________________ JUSTICE P. S. NARAYANA. 18-06-2010. I s L THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 2 1 5 0 OF 2007 Circulation Entry No. 4 9 Date: 18-06-2010 Computer No. 43 Court Master: I s L [1] ) 2005 (3) ALD-4 [2] ) 2007 (2) ALD-675