Crl.M.No.M-25422 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-25422 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:September 13, 2010 Gurvinder Singh @ Murli .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Mohd.Salim, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.45326 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-25422 of 2010 The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.301, dated 4.6.2010, under Sections 399, 401, 402 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar, Patiala, District Patiala. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully, including the order passed by learned Sessions Judge,Patiala, dismissing the application of anticipatory bail filed on behalf of the present petitioner, Annexure P2. Brief allegations against the petitioner-accused are that on 4.6.2010, at about 8.00 p.m., in the area of Sanaur Chowk, Patiala, the applicant alongwith some other co-accused was sitting and making plans for committing robbery in the area. Some of the co-accused were apprehended and however, applicant-accused succeeded in giving slip to the police and ran away. He has been named in the FIR. As per allegations he is the member of gang of thieves, robbers and dacoits Hence, in view of these facts, custodial interrogation of the petitioner-accused is necessary. It is not such a case in which extraordinary Crl.M.No.M-25422 of 2010 (O&M) -2- relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to him. Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Gurvinder Singh @ Murli for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 13.9.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge