IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 17005 of 2010 Date of Decision: 21.9.2010. Ravinder Saini --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.D. Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana and Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate present in the Court have been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents no.1, 5 & 2 to 4 respectively. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioner claims to be the owner along with his brother Narinder Kumar of land in Khasra Nos. 2062 and 2065 in Bahadurgarh. The aforesaid land was acquired by the respondents for development of residential plots. The respondents also formulated a policy for allotment of residential plots/commercial sites to the land owners whose land is acquired for establishment of the urban areas. Petitioner relies upon the policy dated 13.8.1992 (Annexure P-2). Petitioner made a representation (Annexure P-3) seeking allotment of the plot under the oustees' quota in accordance with the aforesaid policy. Respondent no.3 vide his communication dated 20.1.2009 asked for the comments of the Estate Officer on the representation of the CWP. No. 17005 of 2010 -2- petitioner. Receiving no response, petitioner made another representation (Annexure P-5) but no decision has been taken thereon till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the representation made by the petitioner, referred to above. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.3 to take decision on the representation made by the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 21.9.2010. lucky