@ \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NOWL‘rg OF 2009 PETITIONER: jay Kumar Chouhan, S/o Bhondlal Chouhan, aged about 50 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE/£26 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA & M_(og/q .........., {Y\\. . ?.?v""‘ m a. V“AQ‘M”.% working as Hostel a Superintendent, Dabhra, Dist; Janjgir—Champa (CG). WG5€w \(b . 53$ Versus RESPONDENTS : /1 State of Chhattisgarh, Through the ‘ Secretaly, Department of SC/ ST Development, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, (CG). / 2. Under Secretary, - Department of SC/ ST Development, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). f: 3.” Commissioner, I” Department of SC/ ST Development, Chhattisgarh, ’Raipur (CG). ' Collector (Tribal Welfare), Dist. Janjgir-Champa (CG). / / 5. Assistant Commissioner, ‘x (Tribal Welfare), Dist. Janjgir- Champa (CG). _\¢\ ’gE WWWW I? Cb) mm [4am mww w‘mm mm(m) mm1¥wm WWW $3imm petition is to the order dated 30.6.2009 (Annexure P/ l) passed by the respondent No.1 by which the petmoner who 1s worklng as Hostel Superintendent (UDT) has x ‘ $been transferred irom Scheduled SB' HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRTTENKER DIWAKER 19 s ongq Shrl H S PaLel ccunsel for Ihe petitioner. Shm U N S Deo G A for the State. Challenge in the present Caste Hostel, Dhabra, District Janj gir to Middle School Katekalyen, Distt. Dantewada. Contention of the counse for the petitioner is that the petitioner is an Upper Division Teacher and the seniority of the Upper Division Teachers is beirg maintained district wise. He further submits that if the petiti r is compelled to go and join in the transferred place, his seniorit would be adversely affected. ts that let the petitioner make a suitable representation to the au horities concerned which would be decided in accordance with l . To this proposition of the State counsel, counsel for the petitioner showed his agreement. However, he prays for an interim protecti n till the representation of the petitioner is decided by the autho ties concerned. Aocordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction that if the petitioner makes a re esentation to the authorities concerned within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the authorities concerned shall decide the same within a further peripd of three w eks from the date of its receipt. Till then the order impugned shai be kept in abeyance so far as it relates to the petitioner. Counsel for the State sub Sd/- Pritiuker DiWaker 7 Judge o e i a