$-s+ & 35 , * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + crl. M.c. L49Ll2O11 andCrl. M. A. Nos. 545612O11 & 5457lzOLl PROMOTIONS & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathi, Adv. versus YOGESH SHARMA .... Respondent Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, APP + CRL.M.C. L492|2OL1 and Crl. M.A. Nos.5456l2OL1 & 5457IZOLL & PROMOTIONS & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathi, Adv. versus YOGESH SHARMA ..... ResPondent Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI ORDER o9.o5.2011 ,' 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners, after brief submissions, on the merits of the case has contended that the petitioners are interested in settling the matter with the respondent. It has been pointed out that earlier also while obtaining the anticipatory bail, the respondent had been paid an amount of Rs.7,95,000/- in a staggered manner whereupon the learned Sessions Judge was pleased to grant.the anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The o/o Signing Date:29.08.2024 17:09:50 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified 2. 3. aforesaid amount has been paid subject to the settlement being arrived at or the defence being taken by the petitioners during the course of the trial in respect of the FIR no. I5O|2O1O under Section 4061420 IPC registered by P.S. Connaught Place, New Delhi. It has been contended that the petitioners are prepared to settle the matter provided the parties are referred to the Mediation Qell. Since the petitioners are withdrawing the petition and have expressed their desire to settle the matter once for all, the learned Trial Court shall refer the matter to Mediation Cell on appearance of the petitioners for the purpose of exploring the possibility of settlement, on the next date of hearing. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. Dasti. r v.K. SHALI,J MAY KPs o9,2ott a' 4. 5. I