In the Punjab and Haryana High Court, at Chandigarh. CRM-M-12912 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on July 08,2011 Baldev Singh --Petitioner vs. State of Punjab --Respondent. Present: Mr.H.S.Rakhra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.A.S.Rai,DAG,Punjab. Mr.A.S.Bhullar, Advocate,for the complainant. Rakesh Kumar Jain,J:(Oral) This is a petition filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 (for short, Cr.P.C.') for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 70 dated 10.7.2008, under Sections 302, 307, 325, 356,336, 148,149 of IPC and 27,25,54,59 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station, Sangat, District Bhatinda. The petitioner is named in the FIR. However, vide enquiry dated 07.9.2008, he was found to be innocent by the police. Thereafter, on the statement of Santokh Singh -PW-7 on an application moved under Section 319 of Cr.P.C., he has been summoned vide order dated 17.11.2010. The petitioner then filed CRM-M-37920 of 2010 under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for pre-arrest bail in which this Court vide order dated 03.3.2011 granted him interim bail till his regular bail is considered by the trial Court. The learned trial Court vide its order dated 22.3.2011 has dismissed the application for regular bail of the petitioner. CRM-M-12912 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Aggrieved against the said order, the present application for bail has been filed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that he was found to be innocent in the report dated 07.9.2008. In reply, learned counsel for the respondent submits that three persons have been murdered in this case, namely Labh Singh, Harbans Singh and Sukhdev Singh and five persons namely Santokh Singh, Baldev Singh, Sukhdeep Singh , Jit Singh and Subhash Chand have been injured. He further submits that one of the injured Santokh Singh appeared as PW-7, who has specifically named the petitioner that he was armed with gandasa and has given injuries to Labh Singh deceased. Learned counsel also submits that so far no bail has been given by the trial Court to any of the accused and the case is now at the stage of prosecution evidence and is fixed for 04.8.2011. Keeping in view the nature of offence and also the fact that the accused /petitioner has not even challenged the summoning order in which he has been allegedly falsely implicated, I do not find any merit in the present petition for the purpose of granting bail and the same is hereby dismissed. July 08,2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge