IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3437 of 2010 RAMDEO SINGH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RETIRED JUNIOR LINEMAN, SON OF LATE MAUZI SINGH, RESIDENT OF AT PRESENT C/O SRI RAJ KISHORE SINGH, RETIRED JUNIOR ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, MOHALLA- NEW PURANDARPUR, NEAR DOPULWA, NEAR DR. JANARDAN SINGH LANE, SIHO BHAWAN, IST FLOOR, P.O.- MITHAPUR, P.S. JAKKANPUR, PATNA-1 Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 2. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR (TERMINAL BENEFIT) BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 4. THE GENERAL MANAGER-CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER, TIRHUT AREA ELECTRICITY BOARD, POWER HOUSE ROAD, MUZAFFARPUR 5. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTS, TIRHUT AREA ELECTRICITY BOARD, POWER HOUSE ROAD, MUZAFFARPUR 6. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PERSONNEL, TIRHUT AREA ELECTRICITY BOARD, POWER HOUSE ROAD, MUZAFFARPUR 7. THE ELECTRICAL SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, MAIN ROAD, MOTIHARI, DISTRICT- CHAMPARAN 8. THE ELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE EINGEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, RAXAUL, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN. ----------- 2 25.02.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the respondent-Board. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation from the post of Junior Lineman under the respondent no.8, the post retiral dues on account of pension, gratuity and leave encashment have not been settled as much as no provisional pension have been sanctioned which the authorities were required under the rules to sanction immediately upon his superannuation. It is submitted that the provident fund dues and the amount of group insurance have been paid after long delay, and as such, the petitioner is entitled for payment of interest for delayed payment as well. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Board submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.2. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the representation of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable could also be paid to the petitioner along with statutory interest. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)