IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1534 of 2006 MATUKDHARY MANDAL & ORS Versus SURENDRA MANDAL & ORS ----------- 3. 5.12.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioners. The only ground urged by the counsel for the petitioners, that the proposed interveners were subsequent purchaser of a suit property in a partition suit, as a matter of fact would not make them necessary party or proper party. The interest of such purchaser would definitely be represented by the vendors including the plaintiff. If there be any impediments in title of the purchaser they will also have a liberty to file their independent suit. With the aforementioned observation, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/