IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 30TH APRIL 2009 / 10TH VAISAKHA 1931 WP(C).No. 13004 of 2009(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. KERALA ELECTRICITY EMPLOYEES CONFEDERATION INTUC,REP.BY ITS ERNAKULAM DISTRICT COMMITTEE SECRETARY SHAIJU KELANTHARA, KELANTHARA HOUSE,PANANGAD,ERNAKULAM. 2. THADEVUS M.J,LINE MAN,ELECTRICAL SECTION KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,VADUTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE J.MATHAIKAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (HRM), KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN,PATTOM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,ELECTRICAL DIVISION,KSEBOARD,ERNAKULAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER,ELECTRICAL SECTION,KSE BOARD,VADUTHALA,ERNAKULAM. S.C. FOR K.S.E.B. SRI. K.S. ANIL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.C. NO. 13004 OF 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 30th day of April, 2009. J U D G M E N T Petitioners are aggrieved by Exts.P1 and P2 proceedings initiated by the authorities of the respondent, Board, for recovery of the excess pay effected to the petitioners due to wrong fixation. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance projected in the present writ petition is confined, for the time being, only to the 2nd petitioner, simultaneously adding that the same has been taken up before the first respondent as borne by Ext.P3. 2. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent, Board as well. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the grievance projected by the petitioner in Ext.P3 representation and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the 2nd petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and W.P.C. 13004 OF 2009 -:2:- at any rate within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. Till such time no recovery shall be effected from the salary of the 2nd petitioner pursuant to Exts.P1 and P2. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. ul/-