Ladda IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1622 OF 2008 Ravindra Rammurat Dwivedi ..Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr ..Respondents. Mr A. K. Prajapati, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs P. H. Kantharia A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND A.R. JOSHI,JJ. A.R. JOSHI,JJ. A.R. JOSHI,JJ. DATED : 4TH MARCH, 2009. DATED : 4TH MARCH, 2009. DATED : 4TH MARCH, 2009. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. This petition is misconceived as can be seen from the reliefs itself. One of the reliefs claimed that no case should be registered against the petitioner ever. Another relief claimed is that even if a case is registered against him he should be given one month’s notice in advance along with the copy of complaint before registration of the crime. Further reliefs claimed are that the police station concerned should not use any force against him or his family members and that he should be informed action taken against him as well as some committee members which he is heading. These reliefs are too general and cannot be granted. This Court cannot presume that the petitioner never will be involved in any crime and as such the reliefs claimed cannot, at all, be granted. However, in the counter affidavit the respondents have brought to the notice of the Court that already six cases are registered upto the year 2005 against him and they are pending in the courts. For these reasons, we do not find any merit in this petition. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (BILAL NAZKI,J.) (BILAL NAZKI,J.) (BILAL NAZKI,J.)