Civil Revision No. 2594 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2594 of 2010 Date of Decision: April 22, 2010 Zubaidan alias Jainab and ors. ...... Petitioners Versus Niamati and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.G.N.Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This petition has been filed against the order closing the evidence of the petitioner-plaintiffs on the ground that numerous opportunities have been granted to them but had not concluded their evidence despite the fact that the case was fixed for the said purpose as the last opportunity. Learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that even though the order of the learned trial court cannot be said to be illegal yet in view of the fact that the matter has now been adjourned for 19.05.2010 for the evidence of the respondent-defendants for the first time, it would be in the Civil Revision No. 2594 of 2010 2 interest of justice if the petitioners are permitted to lead their entire evidence at their own responsibility on the said date before the respondents are called upon to lead their evidence and that in this eventuality no prejudice would be caused to the respondents. On a conspectus of the entire facts, in my opinion, it would be in the interest of justice if the petitioners are directed to lead their entire evidence on 19.05.2010 which is the next date fixed at their own responsibility. It is made clear that no further adjournment shall be granted for this purpose. This petition is allowed in the above terms. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE April 22, 2010 sunita