CRM-M-25195-2011 (O&M) [ 1 ] ::::::::: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25195-2011 (O&M) Date of decision:23.08.2011. Khursid Ahamad and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. U.K.Agnihotri, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This is a petition for grant of regular bail in a pending trial case registered vide FIR No.41 dated 03.08.2009, under Sections 376, 302 IPC at Police Station G.R.P. Jind. The petitioners have been summoned on an application filed by the prosecution under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The summoning order has not been challenged by the petitioners by way of revision. The petitioners have been summoned on the statement of PW2 who has alleged that about 2-½/3 months' earlier to the occurrence, one Nawab Khan had abducted and raped her daughter and on her complaint, a case under Section 376 IPC was registered at that time against Nawab Khan who is now in custody since 14.05.2009. During that time, two brothers of Nawab Khan and one Ajay Yadav came to her house and pressurized her to settle the matter. They also offered money to which she did not agree and on her refusal, they threatened her to abduct her another daughter, namely, Pushpa. Lateron, she had found that the deceased Pooja was lying dead near the railway line under eucalyptus trees CRM-M-25195-2011 (O&M) [ 2 ] ::::::::: standing near Hansi Raiwlay Crossings and her lower portion was naked. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case on the statement of PW2. He further submits that in any case, father of Nawab Khan, namely, Raju Khan (petitioner no.3) is not involved in the murder. Keeping in view the gruesome rape and murder of a minor girl, I do not find it to be a fit case for bail. Hence the present petition is dismissed. August 23, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE