IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36200 of 2008 JITENDRA YADAV, son of Amirak Yadav, Resident of Village- Kalaunda, P.S. Akbarpur, District Nawada ….. Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ….. Opposite party ----------- 03/ 21.10.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 302 and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code. He is named in the First Information Report along with Amirak Yadav and Jugal Yadav, who along with petitioner are alleged to have assaulted the deceased with Khanti and Lathi. Petitioner is said to have given farsa blow. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that from perusal of the post-mortem report, it would appear that there was only one head injury on the persons of the deceased, which proved fatal, as such, according to him it is difficult to know from the contents of the First Information Report as to who is the author of the fatal head injury. Counsel for the informant submitted that the charges have already been framed and prosecution witnesses are available for being examined in the trial court. Considering the fact that petitioner is in jail custody since 28.11.2007 and charges have already been framed, I direct the trial court to proceed with the trial on day to day basis and conclude the same as early as possible, in any case within six months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this 2 order. However, in case, on account of the failure of the prosecution to examine the witnesses on the date fixed, trial is not concluded within the stipulated period, petitioner shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. Let this order be forwarded to the District Judge, Nawada in connection with Akbarpur P.S. Case No. 160 of 2007 corresponding to G.R. No. 1767 of 2007 through fax by the office of this Court for communication to the trial court. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)