IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40369 of 2009 DINESH YADAV SON OF LATE JAG NARAYAN YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – BALI, P.S. GAURICHAK, DISTRICT – PATNA Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 17.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged is under Sections 341, 323, 379, 504 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted that petitioner has been implicated in this case for ulterior purpose since prior lodging of this case wife of the petitioner has lodged a case against the informant. It is further submitted that as a matter of fact, the dispute arise on account of land dispute as indicated in Annexure -3 of the petition. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is specific allegation that the informant while going to the bank for depositing the case, this petitioner took away a sum of Rs. 30,000/- (thirty thousand) from the pocket of the informant as also the pass book. He further submits that petitioner is a person of criminal nature. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)