IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2107 OF 2005 PETITION NO.2107 OF 2005 PETITION NO.2107 OF 2005 Chandrabali Maurya................Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Deepan Merchant with Mr. V.N. Shingnapurkar for Petitioner Mr. V.S.Masurkar with Ms. N.V. Masurkar, for Respondent No.1. Mrs. S.I.Shah with Mr. S.R. Rajguru i/b. S.I. Shah & Co., for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: 25th SEPTEMBER 2006 P.C. . The petitioner approached this Court against the Departmental enquiry which is proposed against him. It is contended that the enquiry is sought to be initiated after a lapse of nearly 20 years. The contention of respondent is that the petitioner got admission by producing certificate of non-recognised institution. Considering the above, we do not propose to interfere at this stage. It will be open to the petitioner to produce all necessary evidence before the Enquiry Officer. With the above observation petition stands disposed of. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLED, J.) REBELLED, J.) REBELLED, J.) (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)