HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH C.R.P.NO.3391 OF 2008 18.11.2010 Between: Janapareddy Jaggarao ..Petitioner And The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its District Collector, Visakhapatnam and others ..Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH C.R.P.NO.3391 OF 2008 ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against the order, dated 13.2.2008 in I.A.No.58 of 2008 in O.S.No.141 of 2007 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Yellamanchili. It is the case of the petitioner that himself and two others are plaintiffs, who filed O.S.No.287 of 2004 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Yellamanchili, for permanent injunction and thereafter O.S.No.8 of 2006 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Yellamanchili, was by the same plaintiffs and subsequently as per orders of the learned District Judge in Tr.O.P.Nos.887 of 2007 and 927 of 2007, the same was transferred to be tried along with O.S.No.8 of 2006 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Yellamanchili. After the transfer, the petitioner filed I.A.No.58 of 2008 to club both the suits and to conduct common trial. The court below after perusing both the case papers stated that the trial was already commenced in O.S.No.8 of 2006 and P.Ws.1 and 2 are examined and therefore O.S.No.141 of 2007 cannot be clubbed with O.S.No.8 of 2006. However, it is stated that O.S.Nos.8 of 2006 and O.S.No.141 of 2007 can be clubbed together for the purpose of joint trial. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not see any infirmity, legal or otherwise in the said order as the trial was already commenced in earlier suit O.S.No.8 of 2006 and P.Ws.1 and 2 are examined. The learned Judge rightly observed that they cannot be clubbed together, but observed that both the suits can be clubbed for the purpose of joint trial. However, when the suits are posted simultaneously and tried together, no prejudice would be caused to the petitioner-plaintiff and there cannot be any conflicting judgments as the suits will be tried simultaneously and will be disposed of simultaneously. The civil revision petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. _________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. 18.11.2010 kpr