IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2991 of 2009 Date of decision: 12th October, 2009 M/s Murli Dhar Anant Ram … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Ramesh Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Petitioner M/s Murli Dhar Anant Ram claims that being old licensee, they were having their shop in the old market. Respondents came out with a Scheme and draw of lots was held. It has been averred in the petition that in the draw of lots so held, name of the petitioner was not considered. The petitioner had earlier filed Civil Writ Petition No. 11976 of 1991. Later, review application No.192 of 2005 was filed by the petitioner, which was disposed of by this Court on July 4, 2008 and liberty was granted to the petitioner to challenge non-inclusion of its name in the draw of lots. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he had submitted a representation (Annexure P-5) to the Chief Administrator, Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board, Sector 6, Panchkula. In response thereto, the Chief Administrator, Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board, vide Annexure P-7, has stated that it will take some time to decide the Civil Writ Petition No. 2991 of 2009 representation. Counsel for the respondents submits that a detailed reply has been filed, controverting all the facts. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he will confine his prayer, at this stage, that his representation (Annexure P-5) be decided within a specified time. Counsel for the respondents very fairly states that they will decide the representation within three months after receipt of certified copy of this order. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that he be granted liberty to assail the order to be passed by the Chief Administrator, Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board, in case the representation is decided against the petitioner. In view of the broad consensus arrived at between the parties that the representation (Annexure P-5) shall be decided within three months, present writ petition is disposed of with liberty aforesaid. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE October 12, 2009 rps 2