Ast 1 cam6.7.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6 OF 2010 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.2 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7 OF 2010 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.3 OF 2010 Shri Sandip R. Borkar. ....Applicant. Vs. Smt.Kavita S. Borkar ....Respondent. Ms.Gauri Godse for applicant. None for respondent. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.A..SAYED, JJ DATED:- JUNE 8, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the Applicant. None appears for the Respondent though served. Counsel for the applicant submits on instruction of the applicant who is present in the court that the applicant would be more than content if the Court were to only stay the decree of restitution of conjugal rights. The applicant undertakes to discharge liability arising in terms of Judgment and Decree dated 31st October, 2009 to pay monthly maintenance as well as amount Ast 2 cam6.7.10.sxw towards monthly rent in respect of premises to be occupied by the Respondent wife on regular basis without any default. The aggregate amount payable to the Respondent wife in this behalf would be to the tune of Rs.6500/- in terms of the order dated 31st October, 2009 passed by the Family Court. In view of this assurance, we stay operation of the decree for restitution of conjugal rights during the pendency of the appeal, which has already been admitted. 2. Both the Civil Applications disposed of on the above terms. (A.A.SAYED, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)