((-1-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.9 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.6 OF 2009 Ganesh Raju @ Tanaji Kamble Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent M.J.Jamdar for applicant. Ms.A.T.Javeri, APP. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 14th January 2009 PC : 1. Heard advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the State. This application for bail has been opposed by the APP for the State. The conviction of the applicant is for the offences punishable under sections 363, 364 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code. The maximum substantive sentence is three years rigorous imprisonment. Admittedly, the applicant was on bail during pendency of the trial. The appeal is not likely to be heard within a span of three years considering the pendency of very old appeals in this Court. Therefore, there is no reason to deny the bail to the applicant. ((-2-)) 2. Hence the application is disposed of by passing following order. 3. ORDER :- The applicant shall be enlarged on the same bail on which he was enlarged during pendency of the trial subject to filing fresh bail bonds within a period of four weeks from today. (A.S.OKA, J.) ((-3-)) mst FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.6 OF 2009 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, appearnaces, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------- M.J.Jamdar for appellant. A.T.Javeri, APP. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 14th January 2009 PC :- 1. Admit. Learned APP waives service. Call for the record and proceedings. (A.S.OKA, J.)