WPMS 2407/2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. Rakesh Kumar Joshi, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri H.M. Raturi, the learned Standing Counsel for the State/respondents. The petitioner is a fair price shop licence holder. The competent authority has suspended his licence on certain charges. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the suspension of the licence, filed an appeal before the Commissioner, which has also been dismissed. The petitioner has, thereafter, preferred the present writ petition. In the meanwhile, the competent authority has issued a charge sheet to the petitioner to show cause as to why his licence should not be revoked. The petitioner has already submitted his reply and the matter is pending consideration before the competent authority. Considering the aforesaid fact, the Court is of the opinion that it would be appropriate if the petition is finally decided one way or the other with regard to the licence held by the petitioner. Since the petitioner has submitted the reply to the charge sheet, the Court is not inclined to dwell into the validity and legality of the suspension order at this stage and the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the competent authority to decide the matter with regard to the licence of the petitioner within four weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after hearing the parties. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) 15-11-2011 SP