IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION P.I.l. No. 128 of 2006 1. Jairam Kuppuswami Mudliar and others ..Petitioners vs. 1. The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents None for petitioners. Shri P.M.Patil, A.G.P. for respondent nos.1, 2 and 4 Shri V.A.Thorat, Sr.Advocate with Shri S.S.Shah for respondent no.5. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR C.J. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR C.J. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR C.J. AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. J. J. 27th June, 2007 27th June, 2007 27th June, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.5 states that the appeal preferred has already been adjudicated by the competent authority in favour of respondent no.5. Therefore, nothing survives in this petition. The same is disposed of with liberty to the parties to take such steps as permissible to them in accordance with law. No order as to costs. (CHIEF JUSTICE) (CHIEF JUSTICE) (CHIEF JUSTICE) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)