g " £315 525WW M1d%£ @ IN THE HIGH coun'r OF CHHA'n'IsGARH AT BILAsPUR (c.G) w.P. s No. é l 2011 Ram Raj Patel aged about 59 years, S/o Late Shri Mangal Prasad Patel, Head Master, Government Middle School Lingiadih, Block Bilha, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 3E§PQNDENT§ :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Public Instructions, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Bilaspur (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Block Bilha, Distt.Bilaspur (C.G.) Officer, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA ,,.‘ \7>\\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ‘. BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.651 OF 2011 PETITIONER Ram Raj Patel Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia) Singie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri K.S. Pawar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushi! Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 3 day of February, 2011) Heard Iearned cou'nsel for the parties. h 2. By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for a. direction to'the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner and provide benefit I _ ' of FR 22 (D) of the Chhattisgarh Fundamental Rules for grant of increments. as provided under the rules and aiso to pay arrears from the date when it became due. At the very outset, Iearned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the identical matter has already been considered and decided by this Court vide order dated 27-3-2008 in W.P. (S) No.4991 of 2006 and the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the said decision. Learned counsel appearing for the State does not dispute that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P. (S) No.4991 of 2006. Learned counsel further submits that if the petitioner files fresh representation before the concerned authorities for the reliefs, which he has claimed by way of this petition, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, subject to verincation of facts. For the foregoing reasons, the instant petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation before the respondent authorities raising all of his grievances raised in this petition and on such representation being made, the” respondent authorities shall consider and decide the same in accordance With law and on its own merits, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gowri l l r l > l l K