THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1174 OF 2002 ORDER: 1 This revision is directed against the judgment dated 01.07.2002 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Kamareddy in C.C.No.737 of 2000 whereby the learned Magistrate acquitted the respondents 2 to 5 herein for the offence punishable under section 498-A of IPC. 2 Brief facts are that on the report given by the complainant P.W.1 a case in Cr.No.37 of 2000 was registered against the respondents 2 to 5 herein for the offence punishable under section 498-A of IPC on the allegation that right from the date of marriage, the second respondent herein started harassing P.W.1 for additional dowry. After the marriage the victim i.e. P.W.1 was brought to the house of the accused where all the accused subjected her to mental and physical cruelty with a demand to get more dowry. Ultimately all the accused necked out P.W.1 on 24.2.2000 along with her son who was aged 11 months demanding additional dowry. However, the court below after full fledged trial found the respondents 2 to 5 herein not guilty of the said offence and accordingly acquitted them of the said charge. The same is questioned by the de facto complainant as the State has not chosen to file any appeal. 3. Heard. 4. Having gone through the entire material available on record, this court is of the view that the court below is perfectly justified in acquitting the respondents 2 to 5 herein. From the evidence of the prosecution witnesses it is clear that there are so many material inconsistencies and the court below has gone into all these aspects very thoroughly and hence I see no merits in this revision and accordingly the same is liable to be dismissed. Further, this is a revision under sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. under which the jurisdiction of this court is very limited. It is only when any material irregularity has been committed by the court below, this court will interfere and that too this court at best can remand the matter to the court below for fresh disposal. But it cannot give any altogether different finding. 4 Accordingly this revision is dismissed. -------------- Kvsn 15.07.2010