//1// IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4457/1999 MAHIPAL SINGH & ORS. Vs. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, JAIPUR & ANR. Date: 15.12.2006. HON'BLE MR. K.S. RATHORE, J. Mr. R.D. Rastogi for the petitioners. Mr. R.S. Rathore, AAG for the State. Mr. Umesh Shringhi for Mr. Manoj Sharma for the respondent No.1 **** This is joint writ petition preferred by the four petitioners. It is not disputed that the petitioners are working since their initial appointment as JCB operators/drivers with the respondents but the grievance of the petitioners is that their services have not been regularised despite of the fact that the posts which are created in the year 1995 have been sanctioned by the authority and Municipal Corporation, Jaipur has also recommended their case vide Annexure- A/2 dated 30.06.2003 filed by the petitioner along with the additional affidavit, but since the State has not considered, therefore, this writ petition is preferred by the petitioners. //2// Learned counsel for the petitioners in support of his submissions placed reliance on the judgment rendered by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5105/1999- Krishna Kant Nama Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. dated 11.07.2006, wherein the respondents were directed to consider the case of the petitioner for regularisation from the date, the similarly situated persons are given benefit of regularisation by way of screening. It is also stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that at the principal seat of Jodhpur similarly situated persons who are working as JCB drivers/operators have been confirmed on the post. In view of the submissions made by the respective parties, it is a simple case of consideration on the post of JCB operator/driver as the petitioners are continuously working on the same posts and the posts are sanctioned and their case has been recommended by the Municipal Corporation, Jaipur, therefore, I deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for regularisation as per the provisions of law by way of screening expeditiously, but in any case not beyond the period of three months from the date of passing of this order. //3// With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. (K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/