Criminal Misc. No.202-MA of 2008 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.202-MA of 2008 Date of decision : 21.8.2008 Narinder Singh Rawat .....Appellant Versus Vinod Kumar @ Vinay and another ...Respondents **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: None S. D. ANAND, J. In the present plea, filed by appellant/complainant to obtain reversal of the finding of acquittal recorded by the learned Trial Magistrate, none has entered appearance. I have been through the file. Learned Trial Magistrate recorded adequate and valid reasons for holding that relevant cheque, which is alleged by the appellant/complainant to have bounced on account of insufficiency of funds, had indeed been issued by the respondent No. 1/accused as a security. (“it is to be believed that the cheque Ex. C-4 was issued by the accused to the complainant by way of security”.) It was also noticed “that the complainant did not produce the account books to show that the accused had actually issued the cheque Ex. C-4 to discharge his liability for the plywood purchased by him from the Criminal Misc. No.202-MA of 2008 -2- **** complainant worth Rs. 23,144.-.” The view taken by the learned Trial Magistrate appears to be in order. It does not suffer from the vice of non-application of mind. Infact, it appears to be a possible view. There is nothing perverse in the manner of appreciation of evidence by the learned Trial Magistrate. Dismissed. August 21, 2008 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE Note: Whether to be referred to Reporter: Yes/No Criminal Misc. No.202-MA of 2008 -3- ****