IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5915 of 2011 ASHA DEVI @ ASHA SRIVASTAVA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2/ 15/04/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State Election Commission. The admitted facts emerging are that the name of the petitioner figured in the voters’ list of 2001. Her name did not figure in the Assembly Election’s voters’ list,2010. She desired inclusion of her name in the voters’ list prepared for the Panchayat Elections, 2011 and filed an application for the purpose on 2.1.2011. The grievance is that her objection was not taken into consideration and contrary to certain guidelines of the State Election Commission, not considered appropriately depriving her of the constitution right to contest for the post of Mukhiya, as well as, to cast her franchise. If the petitioner is aggrieved by any actions of the Commission and/or its officers in not having followed guidelines, the appropriate remedy for the petitioner shall be to first invite the attention of the Commission which is expected to exercise its powers but in accordance with law. The writ application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)