1 ABA 1049 OF 2011 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1049 OF 2011 Mr. Samuel David Charles .. Applicant -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. A. M. Sarogi, for the applicant. Mrs. S. V. Sonawane, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 22nd December, 2011 P.C. 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail, by a member of co-operative society, who alongwith the other members had gone to first informant to protest against some encroachment, which the first informant tried to make on the society property. The first informant alleges that members of the society bet him up and snatched a gold chain worth Rs. 44,000/-. Learned counsel for the applicant states that all this is false. All the same without prejudice to his client's rights and defences, his client would deposit a sum of Rs.44,000/- with the learned trial Court, which would obviate the need of applicant being taken in custody. Considering the nature of allegations made, applicant's being in custody for the p purpose of investigation is not necessary. In the event of applicant's arrest in C.R. No.I 599 of 2011, registered with 2 ABA 1049 OF 2011 Mahatma Phule Police Station, Kalyan, the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing P.R. bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs.25,000/- on the following conditions :- i) The applicant shall deposit a sum of Rs.44,000/- with the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kalyan, within a period of two weeks which amount the learned Magistrate shall invest in the interest earning schemes in State Bank of India, and shall deal with the same at the end of the trial as per result of the trial. On applicant's failure to deposit the aforesaid sum within the stipulated period, order shall stand revoked. ii) The applicant shall make himself available on 28th December, 2011 at 11.00 a.m. for interrogation by the Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when required by the Investigating Officer. iii) The applicant shall also furnish his mobile telephone number and address and other details to the investigating officer. iv) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; v) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. vi) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble 3 ABA 1049 OF 2011 Supreme Court in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of Maharashtra and ors, reported in A.I. R. 2011 (SC) 312. vii) The application stands disposed of . (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)