CWP No.625 of 2007 22.6.2009 Present: Ms.Ruma Kaushik, counsel for the petitioner. Mr.Y.P.S.Daulta, Central Government Counsel for respondents No.1 and 2. Sh.R.M.Bisht, Dy.Advocate General for the respondents No.3 to 6. Ms.Subarlata, vice Mr.Lalit Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.7. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Advocate states that communication sent by her to the petitioner-company has been received back with the report that the petitioner is no longer at the given address. The petitioner is a company having its corporate office at Panchkula and this is the only address given in the petition. Since the petitioner is not responding and Ms.Ruma Kaushik now pleads no instructions, the petition is dismissed for want of instructions. ( Deepak Gupta ), Judge June 22, 2009(m) (Surinder Singh), Judge