IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.966 of 1992 Date of Decision:28.03.2011 Ashok Kumar Chadha ......Petitioner Versus Punjab Mandi Board and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR. Present: Mr.J.S.Maanipur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Nemo for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr.Praveen Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.4. **** M EHINDER S INGH S ULLAR , J.(oral) At the very outset and very fairly, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that this writ petition has become infructuous, which may be dismissed as such, on account of the fact that the service of respondent No.4 has already been terminated. In this view of the matter, the instant writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous. March 28, 2011 (MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR) seema JUDGE