IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46095 of 2008 1.PRAMOD PASWAN 2.Chhotu Paswan 3.Radha Devi 4.Kushumi Devi @ Kusmi Devi---------------petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR---------------------------opp.party ----------- 2. 26.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a police case under Section 307 and other provisions of the Penal Code. The submission is of false implication in what was otherwise a trivial dispute on Holi. Earlier a police case was lodged by the petitioners against the present informant and others under bailable sections of the Penal Code in which they have been enlarged on regular bail. The submission for the present is that notwithstanding one and half months of investigation no injury report is still available, the matter should have been investigated at the first stage to invoke Section 307 of the Penal Code. Considering the existence of a case and counter case, grant of regular bail in counter case, this application is rejected with regard to petitioner nos. 1 and 2 who are alleged to have 2 assaulted with a sharp cutting instrument. Any application for regular bail on their behalf shall be considered in like manner and in like time as that granting regular bail to the informant and others in the counter case, without being prejudiced by the present order. Considering that the petitioner nos. 3 and 4 are ladies with generalized allegation, let them surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of rupees ten thousand each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua, in connection with Kazimohammadpur P.S.case no. 36 of 2007 subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Navin Sinha,J.) spal/