1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 13. CRI. APPLN/4484/2010 (UTTAMRAO SADASHIVRAO PAWAR V/S THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. A.V.Pawar, Adv., for the applicant. Mr.K.M.Suryawanshi, APP for State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 12.1.2011 1. Heard. In Crime No.121/2010, registered at Gangakhed Police Station for the offense under Section 409 of IPC, the proceedings are sought to be quashed by the accused/applicant who was at the relevant time working as a Talathi. Learned Counsel submits that when the accused received charge, he had only received one register of the village concerned - Padegaon with specific record of mutation entry No.924 to 1114 and he did not receive the register for mutation entries 729 to 923. These assertions of the learned Counsel, having verified with the record of 2 the learned A.P.P., are contrary to the record. There is acknowledgment from the accused/applicant having received three old registers of mutation of village Padegaon. This acknowledgment is not annexed in the present application. There is prima facie material against the accused/applicant showing his involvement for the offense under Section 409 of IPC as the accused/applicant was entrusted with the property - the register and he had dominion thereon. Application lacks merit, dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/4484-10crapl