IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR :: JUDGMENT :: D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.298/2008 Cottage Industries Exposition Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Sita Ram Verma & Anr. Date of Judgment :: February 27, 2008. PRESENT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.NARAYAN ROY HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. G.P. Kaushik for the appellants. *** Heard learned counsel for the appellants both on merits as well as in the limitation application. The delay in filing this appeal is condoned. By the order impugned, the learned Single Judge of this Court allowed the writ application and quashed the order dated 12.4.2004 refusing to make reference under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act. Further a direction was given to the respondent no.2 to refer the dispute in regard to termination of services of the writ petitioner for adjudication to the competent court. From the materials on record, prima facie we are satisfied that disputed questions of fact were involved and to adjudicate the disputed questions of fact, the matter was necessary to be referred to the Labour Court for adjudication. -2- The learned Single Judge of this Court faced with this situation, rightly allowed the writ application and directed the authorities to refer the dispute for its adjudication to the competent Labour Court. For the reasons aforementioned, therefore, we find no merit in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ),J. (NARAYAN ROY),CJ. Skant/-