IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 22ND FEBRUARY 2007 / 3RD PHALGUNA 1928 WP(C).No. 6020 of 2007(N) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ K.RAMAN KUTTY NAIR, PARVATHY NILAYAM, P.O.PYNKULAM, CHERUTHURUTHY, THRISSUR DISRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SIBY MATHEW SRI.PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1.THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CHEERAKUZHI CANAL IRRIGATION OFFICE, PAZHAYANNOOR P.O., VIA WADAKKANCHERRY, THRISSUR. 2.THE PANJAL GRAMA PANCHAYAT, VALLATHOL NAGAR, THIRSSUR REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. 4. K.UNNIKRISHNAN, KULANGARA HOUSE, PYNKULAM, CHERUTHURUTHY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. R1 & R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.T.B.RAMANI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No.6020 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 22nd February, 2007 JUDGMENT I do not propose to go into the merits of the matter. But the grievance of the petitioner is that the construction made illegally by the 4th respondent is causing difficulties to the petitioner in the matter of enjoyment of his property. Ext.P1 representation has been submitted by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent-Panchayat. The 2nd respondent-Panchayat will take up Ext.P1 immediately, issue notice to the 4th respondent and hear him as well as the petitioner and take a correct and just decision in the light of the various grounds raised in the Writ Petition. The decision as directed above will be taken by the Panchayat at the earliest and at any rate within one month of receiving a copy of this judgment together with a copy of the Writ Petition and all the exhibits. The Writ Petition will stand disposed of as above. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE