1 I_n the Honble High Court QfJudicature _0_f Bilaspur (C.G.) W.P. NO. L‘QC‘L? 2006 Tribal Welfare Department Ministry, D'.K;S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Education Officer, Mohala 6L District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 6‘wsv‘3v‘ f2, 4? Mock; elmcqHm o+”+”I(w¢ whiq “ ' Dir lb Eafwgawm . Writ Petition under Articles 226 12ml 227 QfQLg C(msrimiirm Qf India for the issuance gf WRIT i_n LIE nalure gfMANDAMI/S certiomri; Directian Prohibiiian Q‘Directions. and far ather Suitable writ g; writs, order gr orders, aG‘ ‘ 3INGLE BENCH; Chhattishgarh at @ $° ‘. ‘ R“ $e“‘~?’K\ A w. “g t P§$J°tloner Komal Kumar Meshram, aged 42 years x Son of Shri Brijlal Meshram, Assistant Teacher, Middle School, Village Bhojtalla, Tribal Block Mahala, District Durg (C.G.) Versus Respondents ....... l. The State Government of Chhattishgarh, @D HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. No. 4094 of 2006 W. P. No. 4095 of 2006 W. P‘ (s) No. 4486 of 2006 w. P. (s) No. 5085 of 2005 Ku‘ Monohamn Shanda Versus Pe'rifioner Respondenfs Sfafe Govt of Chhuffisgar'h & o‘rhers r And W. P. (s) No. 5086 of 2005 Pefi'rioner i Shri Tahalmm Dewangan Versus Respondents : Sfa're Govt of Chho’rfisgar-h & o‘rhers Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sufish K. Agnihorfri. 5hri Ajay Shrivasmva, Advooa‘re for The Pe'riTioners. 5hri V.V.S. Moor‘rhy, Dy. Advoca're Genera! wi'rh Sm‘l’. Anju Ahuja Dy. Govt Advocafe for fhe respondenTs/Sfafe. ' Pe‘l’i'fioner : Komul Kumar Meshram Versus Respondenfs : The Sfa‘re Govt of Chha‘f‘fisgarh other-s Pe+ifioner i 50m Nu‘rh Bhandari Versus Respondenfs The 511112 Govt of Chhaffisgarh & ofhers Pe'ri‘rioner : Shri Jaggumm Marge Versus Respondenfs : The Sfa‘Ve Govt of Chhu'r'risgarh & another @ ORDER (9“ oc+ober, 2006) . Learned counsel appearing for The pefi‘rioners submi‘rs ‘H'Ia‘l' while working as Assisfanf Teachers/Upper Division Teachers, 'fhe pe'l'i'l’ioners have gone on mining To improve +heir qualifications on 'rheir own expenses and acquired B.Ed./B.T.I Examina'iion Cerfifica‘fe. . The presenf wri'i' pefi‘l’ions, being W.P. Nos. 4094/2006, 4095/2006, W.P.(s.) Nos. 4486/2006, 5085/2005 and 5086/2005 involve similar facis and common ques'iion of law. Thus, These pe'l'i'rions are being disposed of by fhis common order. . According 1'0 learned counsel for ‘fhe pefi'l’ioners, 1'he pe‘i'i'l’ioners are enfifled +0 iwo advance incremeni’s in view of The decision of This CourT in The case of Yashwanf Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal CorporaTion, burg and anoTher {2006 (H) MPJR—CG 96}. This CourT in The case of VashwanT Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal CorporaTion, Durg and anoTher (Supra), came To The conclusion ThaT The Teachers, who had obTained B. Ed./B.T.I. ExaminaTion CerTificaTe on his own expenses, are covered by The circular daTed 24.12.98 issued by The STaTe GovernmenT of Madhya Pradesh. . Learned counsel for The peTiTioners furTher submiTs ThaT The focTs and quesTion of law involved in The presenT cases are squarely covered by decision of This CourT in The case of @ Yashwan‘r Kumar Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporn‘fion, Durg and anofher- (Supra), f0 which learned counsel appearing for 1’he responden'rs faMy concedes and agrees wi'l'h the avermen'l' made by Ieamed counsel appearing for the pefifioners. . Accordingly, +he wri‘l' pe‘l’ifions are allowed in ferms of lhe order passed in 'H'ie case of Yashwan‘i' Kumar- Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and ano‘l'her (Supra). subjecl' f0 verifica'l‘io’n of 'rhe fad as “to whefher 'lhe pefifioners have acquired B. Ed./B.T.I. Examina'lion Cer'l'ifica'fe on ‘lheir own expenses or no‘l’. No order as Subhash To cosfs. pe‘l'i'lions. _ i Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotr‘i Judge a . A copy of This order be placed on record of ofher connec‘l’ed writ l