IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10561 of 2009 ====================================================== Ram Pravesh Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Bihar Industrial Area Devp. Authotity & Ors. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ambar Nath Banerjee Mr. Bimlendu Shekhar Thakur For the Respondent/s : Mr. Lalit Kishore, AAG-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL) 6 31-01-2012 Both sides present. Mr. Banerjee learned counsel for the petitioner states that part of the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed since the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (for short ‘BIADA’) has already paid the gratuity amount. It is his contention that the employees of the BIADA are also entitled to payment of leave encashment. Mr. Lalit Kishore, AAG-1 for the respondents, on the other hand, submits that the aforesaid benefit is not being granted to the retiring employees of the BIADA after the order contained in Annexure-1. Mr. Benerjee learned counsel for the petitioner submits Patna High Court CWJC No.10561 of 2009 (6) dt.31-01-2012 2 / 2 2 that he would bring on record the documents that would indicate that the BIADA is paying leave encashment to its retiring employees. Let such affidavit be filed within three weeks, failing which the application shall stand rejected without further reference to the Bench. In the event of compliance, the matter shall come up after four weeks within top forty cases. HR/- (Kishore Kumar Mandal, J.)