IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14921 of 2009 1. RAMDEO LAL DEO S/O SHRI THITHAR LAL DEO VILL+P.O SHIVRAM, P.S. BAHERA, DISTT- DARBHANGA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENTOF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE null GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR IN CHIEF, HEALTH SERVICES GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE REGIONAL DY. DIRECTOR, HEALTH SERVICES DARBHANGA DIVISION, DISTT- DARBHANGA 4. THE CIVIL SURGEON - CUM - CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER MADHUBANI, DISTT- MADHUBANI 5. THE IN- CHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE BABUBARAHI, DISTT- MADHUBANI With CWJC No.14922 of 2009 1. HARENDRA KUMAR S/O SHRI MAHIVIR DAS VILL- CHAUHATA, P.O. KAMTAUL, P.S. BISFI, DISTT- MADHUBANI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY , DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH& FAMILY WELFARE GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR - IN- CHIEF, HEALTH SERVICES GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE REGIONAL DY. DIRECTOR, HEALTH SERVICES DARBHANGA DIVISION, DISTT- DABHANGA 4. THE CIVIL SURGEON- CUM - CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER MADHUBANI, DISTT- MADHUBANI 5. THE IN- CHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE BABUBARAHI, DISTT- MADHUBANI With CWJC No.14924 of 2009 1. HARE KRISHNA ROY S/O SHRI SIYA RAM ROY VILL- SHIVRAM, VIA- NEHRA, P.S.- BAHERA, DISTT- DARBHANGA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & FAMILY GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR - IN- CHIEF, HEALTH SERVICES GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE REGIONAL DY. DIRECTOR, HEALTH SERVICES DARBHANGA DIVISION, DISTT- DABHANGA 4. THE CIVIL SURGEON- CUM- CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER MADHUBANI, DISTT- MADHUBANI 5. THE IN- CHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE GHOGHARDIHA, DISTT- MADHUBANI ----------- 02/ 15.02.2010 Petitioners have filed these writ applications for setting aside the order of their termination probably issued long time back in 1995-96. From the pleadings it is apparent - 2 - that the termination order never challenged by the petitioners at any stage. Present writ applications have been filed in the light of the order passed in L.P.A. No. 946 of 2003 and analogous cases. Considering the facts of this case, I am of the view that the direction issued in L.P.A. No. 946 of 2003 and analogous cases has no application in the case of the petitioners. These writ applications are dismissed. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)