IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.756 OF 1998 NO.756 OF 1998 NO.756 OF 1998 Bank of Baroda ...Plaintiff Versus Sharad D. Desai ...Defendant Shri Sanket Sethia i/by Shri V.N.Tendulkar for the Plaintiff. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : JULY 04, 2007. : JULY 04, 2007. : JULY 04, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff-bank has filed a suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.01,01,184.13/- together with interest thereon at the rate of 18.25 per cent per annum. The claim in the suit is based on various documents executed by the Defendant including a demand promissory note, a letter of confirmation and a letter of continuing security. A certified true extract of account of the Defendant is also placed on record. 2. There is no written statement filed by the Defendant. This is a fit case for passing a decree by invoking Rule 10 of Order 8 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. 3. Hence, the suit is decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE