IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22114 of 2010 1. KAMAKHAIYA THAKUR S/o Rajeshwar Thakur 2. Dilip Thakur S/o Hari Lal Thakur 3. Babulan Thakur S/o Rajeshwar Thakur 4. Birender Rao S/o Late Bharat Rao All the resident of Village- Mathiya P.S.-Lauriya, District- West Champaran 5. Bhulan Thakur S/o Ram Prasad Thakur Resident of Village- Khairathiya P.S.-Manpur District- West Champaran. 6. Uday Pratap Rao S/o Late Bharat Rao Resident of Village- Mathiya P.S.-Lauriya Dist-West Champaran 7. Lalesh Thakur S/o Ram Prasad Thakur Resident of Village- Khairathiya P.S.-Manpur, District- West Champaran. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 323, 448, 379, 384, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the informant’s land has been sold by accused Uday Pratap Rao to accused Bhulan Thakur, Ganesh Thakur and others in order to realise 70,000/- rupees and from the said land sugarcane crops worth Rs. 15,000/- were cut. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that Annexure-2 reflects that the land 2 in question was sold to the petitioner by registered sale deed and if the informant was aggrieved he ought to have challenged the sale deed as contained in Annexure-2. Moreover, the allegation of cutting the sugarcane from the same field makes no offence, since the land belongs to petitioners. Considering the aforesaid submissions and considering the nature of allegation, let the petitioners, namely, (1) Kamakhaiya Thakur (2) Dilip Thakur (3) Babulan Thakur (4) Birender Rao (5) Bhulan Thakur (6) Uday Pratap Rao (7) Lalesh Thakur in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah West Champaran in connection with Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 89 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C. Anand Kr. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)