- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.78 OF 1989 NO.78 OF 1989 NO.78 OF 1989 Satish Pandit ...Plaintiff vs. A.P.Kundvikar & Ors. ...Defendants Representative of Advocate Harish Joshi Shri Vijay Desai present Mr.M.L.Patan i/b Devyani Wanjara for the defendants CORAM CORAM CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : NOVEMBER 18,2008 : NOVEMBER 18,2008 : NOVEMBER 18,2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. On 8th October 2008, this court directed the plaintiff to personally remain present in this court for recording his oral examination in chief under Rule 2 of Order X of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908. The representative of the Advocate on record for the plaintiff has tendered on record a letter dated 20th October 2008 sent by the said Advocate to the plaintiff calling upon him to remain present. 2. The plaintiff is not present. He has not complied with the order dated 8th October 2008. Hence, the suit stands dismissed for non prosecution. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE