IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD Wednesday, November 23, 2011 Present: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR Crl.P.No. 4719 of 2009 Between: Kasu Prabhakar Reddy ..Petitioner and The State of AP and another …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR Crl.P.No. 4719 of 2009 O r d e r: Heard Sri C.Venkatesh learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. There is no representation for the second respondent. 2. The petitioner herein is the husband of the second respondent, who is the de facto complainant in a criminal case i.e., C.C.No.833 of 2007 on the file of the court of XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. The offence alleged is the one punishable under section 498-A IPC and the second respondent is the de facto complainant in it. Sri Venkatesh very strenuously argued that the allegations in the charge sheet do not disclose any offence at all against the petitioner and therefore the case should be quashed. 3. A perusal of the allegations in the charge sheet would however show that the petitioner being the husband developed intimacy with another lady and started harassing the de facto complainant for one reason or the other and the reasons are mentioned in the charge sheet. The truthfulness of the case against the petitioner has to be decided by the trial court and as those are disputed questions of fact, they cannot be gone into in this petition. 4. Accordingly this petition is dismissed. _____________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J. November 23, 2011. *BVS