1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.318 OF 2007 Vitthalrao Dhondiram Gole .. Petitioner Versus Vijayrao Dhondiram Gole & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.H.S.S.Murthy for petitioner Mr.J.S.Kini for respondents. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 30th October 2007. P.C. . In furtherance of the order passed in presence of parties in my chambers on 22nd October 2007, the parties have tendered consent 2 terms which are duly signed by them and their Advocates. The petitioners and respondents confirm their signatures below the consent terms. Parties do not normally read and write in English but they have been fully explained the terms in the language known to them. The terms record that parties would appear before the Arbitrator and a consent award would be obtained in terms of consent terms just now tendered. That would be in respect of one premises. Insofar as other premises are concerned, the consent terms independently record an understanding and arrangement between parties. In the light of the above, I am satisfied that the terms fully resolve the disputes between the parties, who have placed their signatures thereon and after understanding the implications and consequences. The terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. Order in terms of consent terms. Petition disposed of accordingly. 3 (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)