1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.101 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION N O.231 OF 2008 Shishira Co-operatiave Housing & Ors. ...Petitioners vs. Municipal Commissioner of Greater Mumbai ...respondents Mr.Pravin Vaity a/w Mr.Ahmed Abdi i/b M/s.Abdi & Co. for the petitioners Ms T.H.Puranik for the respondent no.1 Mr.M.K.Jain for respondent no.2 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 16, 2009 P.C. 1 The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner desires to withdraw the contempt petition. The contempt petition cannot be permitted to be withdrawn. However, in view of the order dated 3 rd November 2009 passed by this court, no case is made out for initiating any action against the respondents on the basis of the allegations made in the contempt petition. Hence, the contempt petition is disposed of. JUDGE