weiis^i.Lwui rT*rtTlfrTnm^iTk'l»*su*; '^» °«aia'M«2>^<aa"a^»i a<*a^°uaHMW».],»e^^ HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH SiNGLE BENCH: HON'BLE SHRIS.R. NAYAK, CJ. WR1T PETITION N0.692 OF 2006 PETITIONER: Vs. RESPQNDENTS: ^rico Steel EngineB'ing Works, Through Charan Singh Agrawal, S/o. Late Shri Amilal Agrawal, Aged about 64 years, Sole Proprietor of the Petitioner Firm, R/o. Bishrampur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) The South Eastem Central Railway, Bitaspur, Through The General Manager, South Eastern Central Railway, Bilaspur. The Divisionat Engineer, (Central) South Eastem Central Rajlway, Bilaspur (C.G.) Present: Shri Anand Kumar Tiwar, tearned counsel for the petiConer. Ms. Samta Jain, teamed counsel on behatf of Shri Amit Chodhary, leamed standing counsel forttie Raihways. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 31st March, 2006) The money claim brought before the Couet by way of this writ petition arises out of a concluded contract, and rights and obligations of the parties on th®completion ofthe contract. The contract in question is an ordinary contract entered into between two parties by executive power of the Railways. Inthat view of the matter, 1 am not inclined to entertain this writ petition. The petitioner can very well workout his legal remedies before the Jurisdictional Civil Court. This writ petition is, therefore, dismissed reserving liberty to the petitioner to workout legal remedies before the JurisdicUonal Civil Court. No costs. Sdi- c^^ ^;»~ ~y