m THE HIGH COURT QF JUDIL‘ATURE AT Wai}£(%pm— U.P.Nuw i S 7 /2001 Steel Authority DF India Limited Bhilai Steel plant, Bhilai,‘ District Burg represented by Exacukive Director (Finance) . . a Patitiunar —Versus — Additianal Cummissioner, Commercial Tax, Raipur. 2. Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax,Burg 3'. Appellate Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax‘,Durg. 4. Staye or Chhattisgarh (‘as Su’ocesso‘r of State of Madhya Pradesh ) through Secretary,‘ Uanijya Karv Uibhag, Raipur ReSponde nts a WRIT PETITIUN UNDER ARTICLES 226‘ AND 227 UF THE CUNSTITUTIUN VQF INDIA. XJ-HC—22 Kw.p°No. 153 ofl [zloim Wm . .....................................W 209 204.2004 Petitiona: by Shri Asrish shrivastava, Advocat e. state by Shri Bhaskar Pyasi. Panel Lawyer. Heard on I.A.No. 2054 of 2004. In para 2 of the app ation 1t has been entati‘on made by t State Govt. has agreed to settle the issue e of court and reduce the rate of entry tax from 0% to 6% subject to the condition that. the petitio withdraws the writ petitiong’ Having heard learned and/ in viey of’t he agreeme of counsel for the parties‘, the impugned order is set- remitted back to the'Addit al Commissioner; Commercial ‘Tax, Raipur for reconsider on of the other-issues and to pass the order afre ,after hearing the parties, in accordance with law. l c mentioned that 'on the rep: d u the petitioner. the respon n r unsel for the parties n ide and the matter is i n a i s With the aboe observ ons this petition stands e i disposed of finally a Parties are entitled or certified COpy of this i ordero ’ Sd/- ’ L.C.BHADOO Judge s n a