IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 27TH KARTHIKA 1931 LA.App..No. 297 of 2009(D) -------------------------- LAR.296/2005 of PRL.S.C.,THALASSERY .................... APPELLANT(S)/ RESPONDENT : ----------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE DISTRICT COLLECOR, KANNUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.K.PUSHPALATHA ADDL.ADVOCATE GENERAL RESPONDENT(S)/ CLAIMANTS : ----------------------------------- 1. KALLEN MATHU, THATTANTAVIDA, MOORIYADU. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER KSIDC, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.D.KRISHNANKUTTY PILLAI FOR R2 SRI.SHEEJO CHACKO FOR R2 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = L.A.A. NO. 297 OF 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 18th day of November, 2009. J U D G M E N T This is an appeal preferred against the award of the Land Acquisition Court, Thalassery in LAR 296/05. An area of 0.0030 hectares of land comprised in R.S.No.27/1 was acquired and by virtue of the award the Land Acquisition Court enhanced the land value at the rate of R s.7,500/- per cent. Against the very same decision the requisitioning authority namely K.S.I.D.C. preferred an appeal as L.A.A.1444/08 and the Hon'ble Judge of this Court by its judgment dated 31.10.2008 had dismissed the appeal with the observation that the said judgment will not be a precedent in any other case. So it has to be stated that now the State has come up in appeal against the very same award and so the result has to be the same. Therefore in the light of the dismissal of L.A.A.1444/08 it follows that the present appeal is also to be dismissed and I do so and making it very clear that it will not be a precedent in any other case. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-