1N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P. No. ’0 g 0 /200§-r (s3) Anil Naamdev, “/f S/o Shri Ramsharan Naamdev, aged about 45 years, R/o Purani Basti, Kota, Bilaspur (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS REspombEN'rs v/“L State of Chhamsgaxh, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2§30F THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA Through Secretaly , Education OQ‘I Departmcnt D.K.s. Bhawan “Ep/éwa7 Raipur (C.G.) ® 6"»9" K/ ‘6' 2. Director of public Instruction , Pensionbada Raipur (C.G.} HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (5) No. 1080 of 200/ Pe'i'i'i'ioner : Ani§ Nuamdev Versus ReSponden'rs 51a1'e of Chha‘f‘i'isgarh & anoi'her Singie Bench: Hon’bie Mr. Jusfice $a1ish K. Agnihofri. Mr. Kumaresh Tiwari, Advom’re for The pefifioner. Sm‘I’. Anju Ahuja, Dapuiy Governmen'i' Advoca'l'e for ‘l'he Siafe/respondenfs. O R D E R (Passed on fhis 26"” Day of February, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for 'Hne pe'i'ifioner submi'fs 141a? fhe pefi‘l’ioner is working as Assisfenf Teacher/Lec‘i’ur‘er. The pe‘l’i‘l’ioner‘ ob'i'ained B. Ed‘ Examina'rion cerfifica‘l'e on 14-7-1992, on his own expenses. Learned counsel appearing for 1he eerifioner submi‘rs rha‘t the quesfion involved, herein asfo whe'l'her 'fhe Teacher, who ob‘rained B. Ed. Examination Cer‘lifica'l'e on his own expenses is en'i'i'lled 'l'o 'l'wo advance increments. According ‘i'o learned counsel for fhe pefifioner, fne pefi'rioner is en’i'ifled +0 Two advance incremenfs in view of f'ne decision of fhis Cour? in 'H'Ie case of Yashwan‘l' Kumar Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipal Corporal-ion, burg and ano‘l‘her {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}. This Cour‘l' in 'i'he case of Vashwan‘l' Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and anofher (Supra), came +0 fhe conclusion Tha‘r The Teachers, who had obfained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examinafion Cer‘iificafe on fheir own K)» expenses, are covered by The circular da‘fed 24.12.98 issued by 'fhe S‘l'a'i'e éovemmen'l’ of Madhya Pmdesh. Learned counsel for fhe pefi'fioner furfher submi'fs 1-ha1' The fee-rs and ques+ion of iaw involved in 1'he presem‘ case are squareiy covered by decision of This Court in The case of Vashwan‘r Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal €orparafion, burg and ano‘ther (Supra), to which ieurned counsei appearing for fhe responden’i's fairly concedes and agrees wifh fhe avermenf made by learned counsel appearing for fhe pefi‘iioner. Accordingly, fhe wrif pe‘lifion is allowed in Terms of fhe order passed in fhe case of Yashwanf Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and anofher (Supra), subjecf fo verificafion of The facT as To wheTher f'ne peTiTioner has acquired B. Ed. ExaminaTion CerTificaTe on his own expenses as per The circulars daTed 24.12.1998 (Si 1.31999 and fur'i’her wheTher he has been paid Two advance incremenTs or noT. No order as To cosTs. l i Sd/- l J‘Satish K.Agnihmra l i Judge r l Subhash