SB Crlmb No.4124/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B.CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.4124/2010. Nanak Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 26/5/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Raj Kumar Goyal for the petitioner. Shri Amit Poonia, Public Prosecutor for State. ****** Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that offence under Section 366 IPC has been added by the Prosecution, age of the prosecutrix according to her own statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. is 20 years and as per the medical report, between 18-19 years. In her statement u/S.164 Cr.P.C., she has admitted that she has married with the petitioner and has not supported the prosecution case. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case but having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am SB Crlmb No.4124/10. 2 inclined to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. In the result, this bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Nanak S/o Shri Vishram shall be released on bail in FIR No.163/2010 P.S. Mathura Gate, Bharatpur for offence u/Ss.363, 366 and 376 IPC on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing until conclusion of the trial. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil