IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 17TH OCTOBER 2011 / 25TH ASWINA 1933 OP(C).No. 3335 of 2011(O) -------------------------------------- OS.368/2011 of MUNSIFF COURT, THALIPARAMBA .................... PETITIONERS ---------------------- 1. ROYICHA GEORGE,S/O.VARKEY, KOOVERI AMSOM, CHAPPARAPPADAVU DESOM, MANKARA.PO, CHAPPARAPPADAVU,TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR 670 141. 2. PAZHAYADATH SOPHIYAMMA THOMAS,W/O.ROYICHA GEORGE,KOOVERI AMSOM,CHAPPARAPPADAVU DESOM, MANKARA.PO,CHAPPARAPPADAVU,TALIPARAMBA,KANNUR 670 141,BOTH THE PETITIONERS NO.1 AND 2 HOLDER KUNHAMMA THOMAS,THONIKUZHIYIL HOUSE,PULIMPARABA PO,TALIPARAMBA ,KANNUR 670 141. BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. JESTIN JOSE,S/O.E.C.JOSEPH, KOOVERI AMSOM,CHAPPARAPPADAVU DESOM, MANKARA,PO CHAPPARAPPADAVU , TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR 670 141. 2. JESSY KURIAN @ THRESSIAMMA, W/O.JESTIN JOSEPH,EDATTEL HOUSE, TALIPARAMBA AMSOM, KEEZHATTOOR DESOM, TALIPARAMBA,KANNUR 670 141. THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss OP(C) NO.3335/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1:- TRUE COPY OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY. EXHIBIT P2:- TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN OS NO.368/2011 EXHIBIT P3:- TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED DATED 21/1/2011 EXHIBIT P4:- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 25/3/11 IN CMP 488/2011 EXHIBIT P5:- TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 22/9/2011 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss THOMAS P JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------- O.P(C).No.3335 of 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this 17th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioners claim to have purchased the suit property as per a registered document executed by the respondents who however refused to vacate the building in the suit property. Hence petitioners filed O.S.No.368 of 2011 before the learned Munsiff, Taliparamba for eviction of respondents, prohibitory injunction and other reliefs. Petitioners want a direction for early disposal of the suit. 2. Learned counsel contended that petitioners are holding the property as per a registered document executed by the respondents and that they are in unlawful possession of the property. 3. The suit is of the year 2011. The preliminary steps in the suit are to be completed before it is taken up for trial in the list. At this stage, I do not consider it necessary to issue a direction for early disposal. But I make it clear that it is open to the petitioners if (or, after) preliminary steps in the suit are over, to request learned Munsiff for expeditious disposal of the suit. With the above observation this original petition is closed. Sd/- (THOMAS P JOSEPH, JUDGE) Sbna/-