;>w ^ \ 0^1 /- *Ss^::-'S5S^:'i?^ IN THE HON'BLE HISH^OURT Q^ CHHATTISeARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETTTION fS) N0.39^ 'i/2009 PETmONER RESPON&ENTS ^I^.- ^0^1^,---"" w •^ o- VERSUS 1. 2. 3. Thakur Ram Arilley, aged about 57 years, Son of Shri Munchuram Arilley, "Lecturer", 6ovt. High School - Chind, Block - Sarangarh, Tahsil- Sarangarh, Distt- Raigarh (C.6.) 1- The School The State of Chhattisgarh, Secretary, Department Education, Mantralaya, Dau Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) The Director / Commissioner, Shikshan Sanchanaloya, Raipur (C.6.) The District Educction Officer, Oistrict Raigarh (C.£.) ^.The Block Education Officer, Block- Sarangarh, District - Raigarh (C.6.) WRTT PEm-ION U/A - 226 OF THE CONSTTTUnON OF IN&IA HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPDR SB : HON'BLB SHRI JUSTICB NUTINKSR DIWAKNt W.P.ISt N0. 3929/2009 PETITIONER Thakur Ram Arilley Veraws RBSPONDEMTS State of C. G. &s Others wwrr PBTTTIOH impER ARTICLB 226 OF THE COIISTITUTIOH <w IBDIA ABnearance: Shri Roop Naik, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. G.A. for the State. ORAI.ORDBR (29.07.2009) With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. By way of this petition the petitioner is seeking regular pay scale on the post of Lower Division Teacher. Counsel for the petitioner submits that number of identical petitions have been decided by this Court and the issue involved is a concluded one. He has also referred to one of the orders in W.P. (S) No. 813/2007 (Ram Kumar Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh) in which regular pay scale was granted from the date of initial appointment. Counsel for the respondents/State submits that in the light of the judgment of this Court the petitioner may make a representation to the authorities concemed and the saine would be decided after scrutinizing the factual and legal position. Thus, it is directed that if the petitioner makes a representation to the authorities concemed within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same shall be decided within a further period of one mcaith from the date of its receipt. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority ooncemed is at Uberty to decide the representation of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge ^-