IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 20756 of 2006 Between: Ch.Hariprasad S/o.Veera Raghavaiah Shop No.1, Marupuru village, Podalakur Mandal, Nellore District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nellore, Nellore District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Podalakur, Nellore District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not supplying the essential commodities to the petitioner F.P. Shop No.1, of Murupur village, Podalakur Mandal, Nellore District as illegal, arbitrary, without any authority of law or jurisdiction, unjust and violative of ARticles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to release the essential commodities to the petitioner F.P. Shop as long as his authorization is subsisting, and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.SUDHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 20756 of 2008 Oral Order: The writ petition is ﬁled aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not releasing the essential commodities to a Fair Price Shop Authorizee of Shop No.1, Marupuru village, Podalakur Mandal, Nellore District, without any order of suspension or cancellation of authorization. By an interim order dated 29-09-2006 the respondents were directed to supply the essential commodities to the petitioner provided his authorization is subsisting as on the date of the order. The matter came up today for hearing. Though the writ petition is admitted on 29-09-2006 no counter aﬃdavit is ﬁled so far. In view of the non-traverse, the allegations in the writ petition must be considered to have been admitted. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to continue to supply the essential commodities to the petitioner during the subsistence of his authorization. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 31-07-2008 pvks