1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No.602 of 2010 (Govind s/o Gulabrao Ambulkar v. Govardhan s/o Bapurao Charpe) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri S.P. Bodalkar, Advocate for Applicant. Shri S.G. Loney, Advocate for Respondent. Coram : R.M. Borde, J. Dated : 22 nd July, 2010 Heard respective counsel appearing for the parties. An application came to be tendered in the pending proceedings by the accused, the petitioner herein, requesting the Court to call a witness in defence and the same came to be allowed by the Trial Court without issuing notice to the complainant in the matter. The witness sought to be examined by the defence is a Judicial Officer posted at Sangamner. Except for contending that the Judicial Officer is related to the complainant, the accused is not in a position to show the relevance of calling the witness, who is a Judicial Officer, for the purpose of examination. In these circumstances, the Revisional Court has caused interference and quashed the order of the Trial Court. I do not find any infirmity in the order passed by the Revisional Court. The application is devoid of substance and the same stands rejected. Judge. pdl.