IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1506 of 2008 OF MOTION NO.1506 of 2008 OF MOTION NO.1506 of 2008 in in in INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1075 of 2008 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1075 of 2008 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1075 of 2008 IN IN IN INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. TAX APPEAL NO. TAX APPEAL NO. OF OF OF 2008 2008 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax 12 Mumbai .. Appellant Vs. Ms.Rashmi Ramsinghani ..Respondent Mr.A.S.Rao for Appellant Mr.A.K.Jasani for Respondent CORAM CORAM CORAM : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan and : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan and : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan and A.V.Nirgude, A.V.Nirgude, A.V.Nirgude, JJ JJ JJ DATED DATED DATED : 17th June, 2008 : 17th June, 2008 : 17th June, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this notice of motion, the appellant is seeking condonation of 632 days delay caused in filing the appeal. 2. The appeal is against the order of I.T.A.T.dt.30.1.06. The C.C.I.T. gave its approval for filing the appeal on 11.7.06. However, it took almost 19 months to draft the memo of appeal and another 15 months to obtain court fee stamps. The appeal came to be lodged on 9.4.08. We are not at all satisfied with the reasons given for condonation of delay. No sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Hence, Notice of motion stands dismissed. 2 3. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion, Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1075 of 2008 also stands dismissed. {A.V.Nirgude, {A.V.Nirgude, {A.V.Nirgude, J) J) J) (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J) J) J)