IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 226 of 2008 Gurpal Singh and another …………………..Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ………..……..Respondents. Sri Abdul Wahid, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Arohi Bhalla, Advocate, for the Petitioners. Sri Tanuj Semwal, Asst. Government Advocate, for the State. Sri Ramji Srivastava, Advocate, for the complainant. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Learned counsel for the parties are present. (2) Sri Tanuj Semwal, Asst. Government Advocate, makes a statement that after completion of investigation charge sheet has been filed against both the petitioners, namely, Gurpal Singh and Baljit Singh. A short counter affidavit has also been filed by the Investigating Officer to this effect. (3) In view of the above development, this writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with the observation that the interim order dated 28.04.2008, passed by this Court in favour of petitioner no. 1 Gurpal Singh, shall automatically stand vacated from the date charge sheet is received by the court concerned. (Dharam Veer, J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 13.06.2008 NS