T: T XI-HC-22 •sn^i^i R-ii* sn^i ^tff^) ^tf^^ 's^ •^iraRpT, ^•y'l'o, I'K'iwy ^^^.^A:..M.b::.Z[^^ wwirgiifrai fq^ST' Sn^T ?<fll^R •^ft^ HIGH COUKT OF CHIIATTISOARH AT BILASPUR Cr.A.S ^. Bis J^/ci VUli B.as f'am, son ot Yeradefte, agecl 3U "«"1-." A-4'-!-!»<^1^<i '0/"-S^-^-"-*- -.•?> ^y v-<a.a?L^ lyj.LUjiyci, r\.</i3jiuuiiL uj. |Lge Bneia, p.y. MaTctoom Dlstrlct )tar, Jagdalpur (C.G.) t/ersus RE-SPONDENT Thp Poli Jag. D.B. : Hon'ble Shrl L.fl;. Bhadoo and Hos'ble Shri DUirendra Mishra, JJ. 10-7-2007 Shri Rakesh Pandey, Shri D.K. Gwalre, Add| Htate/ responcient. rleaTd. . Appeal is actmitted torl Leai-ned counsej. tbr accused is ui aetention smct itseu mav be heard finaiM obiection. 'l'lieretore, ttie appeal l' ORALI Tlie ^ccused s.DDcIlaii l^LV/V/^-A^ ttie ludgment 01 conviction wlf[ci4i'T iTTO^ff ^ 'f^11^ <r'i'(^.i< ^?3rfiOT3II^!I 7'13/2001 State of Chhattisgarh, through ;e Staflon Mardoom, Distt. ^alpur (C.G.) for the appellant. .tionat PuDlic Hrosecutor, tor uie lconsiderauon. : . uie appeuant subnuts tnat me 6-11-2000, therefore, the appeal ', to which Shri Gwalre has no s/nearct tor tuial ctlsposal. JUDGMENT IlS-S DT'cfciT'cd tIllS Q.DDCSl S-SSlIlSt <^fcAJ.V> <At-/t-/ i/p t^t.^il-AAJ. JLV.? < l& bnd.order ofsentence dated 20-4- ["Tt^ ^f^ T XI-HC-22 .an^i^iT R-ii'* CT^?I sh+iiqi yfsa TS? •^WIdl, aflly'iio, facii^y 3TI^T xrag? ^.&£:&..S^?..:^31^e'Q\ ^ WflCtT.shllch 'fa^ST' ^TT^T S'WI^R 'Mfifl 4/2p0 dt WOi passed bv the 4m Jagctaipiu' m H.T. Wo.~ yessions Judge alter noldin(s <i. ottence uiiaer yectio^ au^ Jaisingh, sentenced him to pav a tine ot Ks. 5UU/- and[ further undergo R.I. for fhre^ '2.. Case ot me prosecuuqn p.iii. ui tfae evemng ot fc>t Jaisingti witli axe near y<| committed. His muTcter.'l'h^ Vasudev, based on that, Ff. otlence iiader yection 3U2 House umcer, Potice ytauoit of occiirrence. He preparedj Jaisingh. Weapon of offenc^ bodv ol Jaisuign was sent PrimaTy Health Centre, P.W. 5 Dr. R. K. Nag condl report Kx. P-6, m wi-iicn n^ shock'and haemoiThage on was nomicictal HI nature. cnai^e sneet was tuecl UT. <=hl*)^<^Tl ^Ncflf "^ fec3i' <f^l«l< i?3lPOT3I1^T [Aactl. sessions Juctge, Bastar, 'l, wnerebv t&e leaiTiect Adai. me accused appellant guiltv tor i.J-'.C. tor committing miircler ot Imictergo impnsonment tor me, to in defaiilt of payment of fine, to raonms. t, in'brief, is that at about 6.00 >M 1-2000 the accused attacked 1:11001 Para ot vuiage uneia ancl matter was .reportea by F.W. 1 f.I.R. Ex. P-1 for comiaission of '.I.P.C. was registered bv Station 1, Mardemu ana lett tor me scene uiquest Kx. P-2 on Uie Dodv ot - axe was seized uncler ux. P-4. |tor post mortem exammation to under Ux. p-b-A wnere (icted post mortem and. prepared opmecl tliat eause of deatn was laccount ot neact iniui-y and deam ^Uter compietion ot invesugation, |Uie Court ot Juaicial Maas&'ate dt Lohlandiguda M' [TTl^ ^Fta^ T XI-HC-22 . an^i^ii R-(i?b 31I^?I ^•RTcti ^lf^t) "s's? -i<l<<lcl4, anl'y'Ko. fawi'My _S^7^^\ "^I. 200 tlWCTI Shlich fa'btiy" an^r ^grar ^fCT t<'irst ciass, Jagdalpur wno Hessions Juage, dagdatpur t] Juage receivecl ttie case on 3. 'l'ne prosecutioi^ in orai tne accused exaDiinecl -su] accusea was recorctecl unde< ne aerued me matenat prosecutton eyidence aaa oeen taiselv uiipUcated ui mq 4. Leamed Adcll. Session^ counsel tor Uie respecnve il toe accusect as atQremention 5. We have heard Shri R^ ot Uie appeilant and Prosecutor on beuau ot me b. yfiri pandev nas not Jaisingli. Moreover, eve-wltnl and P.W. 3 Badn-sraiii have attacKing me deceased wl coiToboratect bv me eviaenc< stated'mat on 8-11-2000, h|i Doay ot jaismg; mere were side ot necfc. He fias turmerl st&tecl ctil'4^41'1 TTF^f "4 l^zi' <F>i-(•$)< ^? aipOT sii^i id turn comm.itted me case to me 1'om wnere leanied Adcll. yessions 01'anster tor tnal. ;r to establisn me cliarge agauist witnesses. • Statement ot me if yecuon 313 ot cr.J-'.c. m wmcn ^ppearmg against nun m me that he is innocent. He has crune ni auestion. L^ Judge after hearing the learned frartles, convicted and sentenced id. ^Kesli pandey, Advocate on benatt D.K. Gwah-e, Addl. PubUc ^tate. pisputed me homicidal deam of jesses namely P.W. 2 Padmini Bai itated tnat Uiev saw the accused im me axe. 'l'nen' eviaence is ^ of P.W. 5 Dr. R.K. Nag who has conductea post mortem on ttie Dhree incised wounds on the back statea mat on operung Uie Oodv, [1[ft^^f<a^ SHi-i ^-. XI-HC-22 4 "s^ -><Mlcl'i), aTil'M<i<o, IsK'ii'My im^tr stiiich STI^T TRRT ...C^..^:Ua:....7.S^^ Y"""f^8T""-""-""-""-- 3tI^T^T R-ii.* snjsr ?h+ll<=h sn^rwnwHfer ct)l'4?Cl*f1l'HT^ff'^ ^^1 <f^f^l< ^aifigirsn^r ctece&sed he saw mat there was a tr, nas also statect mat toe Oi account ot neacl iniiirv ancl tlie aDQve eviaence, it is ests was nomicictal in nature. v. As lar as mvolveniei Question is concemea, we eve-witnesses P.W. 2 Padni: P.W. 3 Badru Rsun, who was place ot comniission ot Grm tliat at me tune, ttie accusea met nun on me w neaa, as a resuit ol wnicn, aown and diecl spontaneoij Padmmi Bal nas further lanct to e accusecl tor ms stolen toeir carpenter axe, tms tact, mey Drougtit b^ resictence ol tne aecusecl, wl[ is wnv, ne attacKed ner nus| mat tHe offence was wasning ms nancts anci leetl 'd bactaru Kam nas COITOII witntssed g.cture ot nglit teniporai bone. J-le }am was nomicid.at m nature on ttiaemorrriage. 'l'neretore, ui view ot Iblisned Uiat toe cteam otJaismgh ftt ot tne accused. m cnme m Idave scrutinizea Uie evictence ot tru Bai, wite ot ttie deceasea anct washing hands and feet near the ic. 'rney nave categoncauy stated was gomg to nis lieia, me ^.V, attacked wifh tfae axe on the Jaisingn sustamea uiiuries, teu Islv. wite ot uie cteceased F.W. '2. uiat m. tact tnev providea a 'esidence and as uie accused naa wnen Uiev cam.e to Know a&out ;K me carpenter axe trom me y.ch enraged tihe accused aiid tliat pana. sne Has categoncauy stated by yadru Kam as ne was near ttie place ot occun'ence. J-'.W. borated the evldence ot P.W. 2 [Tfr^ ^f<^^ st&ted Vf T XI-HC-22. .-.aii^r^l WM an^i ^i^i -tif&a III- 'ssi •*ll'llM'i1, afll'y'ic, ('(cii'My sir^r xra^? WI^IT shHlcn "^I. 200 (c|<ic{8T" 311^1'B^IIW ^lto l-'admim Bai anct nas sl attacKing uie deceasecl witjti any cu'cumstance .wtncli tatea tnat lie saw Uie accusect me axe. in cross-exainuT.ation ot these two witnesses, the clefence has not been able to eiicit tnai£es tne eviaence ot Uiese two .uilitrustworUTv. 'i'nere is noUTing on SL&a ule witnesses unreliabie o¥.1 record wmcn suggests witnesses snJtters trom ant about ttiese witnesses to case, mat too m sucn a| evidence of Padmuii Bai, i1 having anv p.1ace to residl land tor ms residence became so iingTatetm to ot a person wno gave nun y. P'or tne toregoing rea< insnnit^' ni Uie mipugnj convicting uie accusea sentencnig lum und.er that| 9. T'he appeal being dismissed and it is hereby Sd/- L.G.Bhadoo Judge l=t)i<il<?i<fl<i TTR^rf "^ 'fi'st <^)-^.i< ^? aipgii SD^I Itiat tne eviaence ot uiese two c, .. .' <' uiimnnv anct mere W^no reason impucate me accused.in a taise heinous case. In fact, from the is clear mat ttie accused was not :, meretore, tney provicled Dim a on Uie contran?, tne accusect tamUv Uiat tie hacl taken tlie lite sltielter. L^on, we do not flnd ariy iUegalitv or ;cl luagment ot tne toal Court Tluider yectidn 302 U' l.P.C. anct isection. ot substance cleserves to De tlisnussed. ddvoia Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge [Tfr^ ^fo^