IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR JUDGMENT SULTAN SINGH VS. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. SB Criminal Revision Pet. No. 330 OF 2007 under Section 397 read with section 401 Cr.P.C. against the order dated February 3, 2007 of Additional Sessions Judge No.2 Kishangarh Bass Distt. Alwar in Criminal Appeal No.12 of 2005 whereby the appeal against the order dated August 20, 2005 of the Judical Magistrate Mundawar was partly allowed and confirmed the order of conviction under sections 147, 148, 323, 323/149, 325/ 149 IPC and the order of sentence was modified to the extent that the accused respondents be released on probation for a period of two years in place of three years and they were also directed to pay cost of litigation amounting to Rs. 1000 each instead of Rs. 2500 each. Date of Order : January 29, 2009 PRESENT HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA Mr. Dilip Singh Kurka, for the petitioner. Mr. Ganesh Meena, Public Prosecutor. BY THE COURT : This revision petition has been filed by petitioner Sultan Singh, against the order dated February 3, 2007 of Additional Sessions Judge No.2 Kishangarh Bass Distt. Alwar in Criminal Appeal No.12 of 2005 whereby the appeal against the order dated August 20, 2005 of the Judical Magistrate Mundawar was partly allowed and confirmed the order of conviction under sections 147, 148, 323, 323/149, 325/ 149 IPC and the order of sentence was modified to the extent that the accused respondents be released on probation for a period of two years in place of three years and they were also directed to pay cost of litigation amounting to Rs. 1000 each instead of Rs. 2500 each. 2. Without going into the merits of the case, the larned counsel for the petitioner made a simple, sweet and justified prayer before this court that the appellate order be modified to the extent of reducing the cost of litigation to Rs. 1000/- instead of Rs. 2500/-. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of the appellate court reducing the cost of Rs. 2500 each to Rs. 1,000 each is not justified. 3. Mr. Ganesh Meena, Public Prosecutor, opposed the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. For these reasons I set aside the order of the Additional Sessions Judge dated Feb. 3, 2007 to the extent of reducing the cost of litigation to Rs. 1,000/- each instead of Rs. 2500/-. The order of the Judicial Magistrate Mundawar (Distt. Alwar) dated August 20, 2005 imposing cost of Rs. 2500/- on each of the accused is confirmed. This revision petition is disposed of accordingly. (Mahesh Chandra Sharma) J. OPPareek/