IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12865 of 2010 1. SHYAMA NAND MANDAL S/O LATE SWARUP LAL MANDAL R/O VILL.- BARATANI, P.O.- LASHKARI, P.S.- UDAKISHUNGANJ, DISTT.- MADHEPURA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MADHEPURA 3. THE PRESIDENT DISTRICT TEACHER APPOINTMENT APPEAL AUTHORITY, MADHEPURA 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, MADHEPURA 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, UDAKISHUNGANJ, DISTT.- MADHEPURA 6. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENTION OFFICER UDAKISHUNGANJ, DISTT.- MADHEPURA 7. THE MUKHIYA, GOPALPUR PANCHAYAT, DISTT.- MADHEPURA 8. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GOPALPUR PANCHAYAT, DISTT.- MADHEPURA 9. BHAGIRATH KUMAR S/O JYOTISH MANDAL R/O VILL.- BARATANI, P.O.- LASHKARI, P.S.- UDAKISHUNGANJ, DISTT.- MADHEPURA ----------- 02. 04.04.2011 Repeated application for the same relief is not the answer for the petitioner. From perusal of Anneuxure-7 it is evident that petitioner had approached the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, which was registered as Appeal No. 42/2007. This appeal was dismissed on 25.5.2009 but suppressing such a fact writ was filed in which direction was given to the tribunal to hear the matter. The tribunal has taken note of such proceeding in the order (Annexure-7). There is no clear explanation coming from the petitioner as to why he has acted in a manner which is not permissible. Except for trying to offer explanation that the appeal was dismissed by not holing proper proceedings and 2 hearing, there is no answer as to why second appeal could be maintained. Irrespective of the same the issue has been considered by the appellate authority and the findings being what they are, no interference is required in the matter. Writ has no merit. It is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)