IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 782 OF 2007 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.516 OF 2006 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1976 OF 2006 Shri Shyam N. Pandey. ... Appellant. V/s. UCO Bank and others. ... Respondent. S.B.Sharma for the appellant. Ms.M.R.Patel for the respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATED : 18th August 2009. P.C. : Heard leaned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 13th February, 2007 passed by learned single Judge in Summons for Judgment No.516/2006 in Summary Suit No.1976/2006 whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff was decreed in terms of prayer clauses (i) and (ii) against defendant No.3. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the signatures of the appellant were taken on the blank documents assuring grant of loan to the extent of Rs.5 lakh. However, no such loan was granted by the bank. He further submits that originally the respondent No.2 was a proprietorship concern and, subsequently, it was converted into partnership firm. That the borrowings made by the said proprietorship concern were transferred to the account of partnership firm after obtaining signatures of the partners of the firm in which the present appellant is shown as one of the partners. That is how he is also party to the loan documents. 3. The very same contentions were raised by the appellant before the learned single Judge. They were rejected by a reasoned order under challenge. 4. Having heard parties to the appeal, we concur with the reasons given by the learned single Judge in the impugned order as such it is not necessary for us to reproduce the same once again. The view taken by learned single Judge is reasonable and possible. No perversity could be demonstrated by the appellant so as to warrant interference with the impugned order. 5. In the result, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.) (V.C.DAGA J.)