IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6329 of 2009 ALLAHABAD BANK THRU.ITS DEPUTY . Versus THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER . with CWJC No.6424 of 2009 ALLAHABAD BANK THRU.ITS DEPUTY . Versus THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER . with CWJC No.6430 of 2009 ALLAHABAD BANK THRU.ITS DEPUTY . Versus THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER . with CWJC No.6523 of 2009 ALLAHABAD BANK THRU.ITS DEPUTY . Versus THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER . with CWJC No.6553 of 2009 ALLAHABAD BANK THRU.ITS DEPUTY . Versus THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER . with CWJC No.6590 of 2009 ALLAHABAD BANK THRU.ITS DEPUTY . Versus THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER . ----------- 4/ 27/01/2011 Learned counsel for respondent No.3 as also the private respondents raises a preliminary objection that these applications have become infructuous in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in (2010) 2 S.C.C. 4 acted upon by the Bank when it has issued the necessary circular on 30.10.2010 bearing No.11185/PA/10-11/30. Learned counsel for the petitioner Bank is not in a position to deny the submissions. - 2 - If a circular has been issued by the Bank, it is expected to be acted upon. The writ application is disposed as infructuous. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)