IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2011 / 15TH POUSHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 8817 of 2010() ----------------------------- CMP.10370/2010 of J.M.F.C.-I,NEDUMANGAD .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED: -------------------------------------- SAVITHRI, D/O. NARAYANI, KUNNUMPURATHU THADATHARIKATHU VEEDU, KORANKUZHI, KOTTAKKAKOM MURI, ARYANADU VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN, SRI.K.SATHEESH KUMAR, SRI.K.S.PRAVEEN. RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. ---------------------- Bail Application No.8817 of 2010 --------------------- Dated this the 5 th day of January, 2011 O R D E R In this Petition filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the sole accused in Crime No.97/2010 of Aryanadu Excise Range, Thiruvananthapuram for offences punishable under sections 8(1) and (2) of the Abkari Act for allegedly having been found in possession of 4 litres of arrack seeks her enlargement on bail. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application contending, inter alia, that the petitioner is accused in 4 other Abkari crimes. 3. It is too early to accept the petitioner's contention that she has been falsely implicated in the case. Moreover, I am not satisfied that both the grounds enumerated under Sec.41A (b)(ii) of the Abkari Act are present in this case so as to justify her release on bail. With the above observation this Application is dismissed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. sj