IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 24TH OCTOBER 2008 / 2ND KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 31381 of 2008(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.K.SARADA AMMA, AGED 80 YEARS, W/O.LATE K.K.GOVINDAN NAIR, MANAGER, TRIPPANACHI A.U.P.SCHOOL, P.O.TRIPPANACHI, MALAPPURAM - 673 641. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 14. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KIZHISSERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. SMT.P.REBEEH, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT TRIPPANACHI A.U.P.SCHOOL, P.O.TRIPPANACHI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 641. 6. SRI.A.ABDULSALAM, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, TRIPPANACHI A.U.P.SCHOOL, P.O.TRIPPANACHI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 641. 7. SMT.K.SHEEBA, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT TRIPPANACHI A.U.P.SCHOOL, P.O.TRIPPANACHI MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 641. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.31381/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT Against Exts.P1 and P2 staff fixation orders for the years 2006-07 and 2007-08, appeals were filed before the 3rd respondent and by Ext.P3 order the appeals were rejected and the revisions filed were rejected by the DPI by Exts.P5 and P6. Still aggrieved the petitioner filed Ext.P9 and p10 before the first respondent and those are pending. In this writ petition what is sought for is a direction to the first respondent to expeditiously dispose of Exts.P9 and P10. Counsel also invites my attention to Ext.P7 judgment and Ext.P8 Government order. Be that as it may, having regard to the fact that Exts.P9 and P10 revisions filed against Exts.P5 and P6 are pending before the first 2 respondent, the writ petition is disposed of directing to take up consider and pass orders on Exts.P9 and P10 revisions with notice to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 3 months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. 3