IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.29535-M of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision : 27-01-2009 Bablu @ Gurpreet Singh and another ....Petitioners VERSUS State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate, for the applicants-petitioners. Mr. Mehardeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Vineet Chaudhary, Advocate, for Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (Oral) Crl. Misc. No.3656 of 2009 Allowed. Filing of certified / original copy of Annexure P-4 is dispensed with. Crl.Misc. No.3655 of 2009 Additional affidavit is taken on record. Crl. M. No.M-29535 of 2008 Sh. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate appearing for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners were named as accused in case FIR No.10 dated 28-1-2008 registered at Police Station Banur, District Patiala u/s 323, 325, 148, 149 IPC. Counsel for the State submit that except Section 148 IPC, all offences are compoundable. The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the FIR on the ground that a compromise has been effected with complainant Devender Kumar who was injured in the occurrence. Devender Kumar, according to the Investigation Officer ASI Jagdir Singh, who is present in Crl. Misc. No.29535-M of 2008 (O&M) -2- the Court, had suffered three injuries. Injury No.1 & 2 were swelling on the forearm. Radiological examination revealed that there is a fracture of lower ulna on both sides. Therefore both the injuries were declared grievous u/s 325 IPC. Devender Kumar, respondent No.2 is present in the Court. Sh. Vineet Chaudhary, Advocate has put appearance for Devender Kumar and filed a reply admitting factum of compromise. He has also admitted that compromise Annexure P-2 is arrived at between the parties. Devender Kumar has been further identified by Jagdir Singh ASI.It has been held by a Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 that after the parties arrived at compromise, no useful purpose will be served by continuing with the proceedings. Devender Kumar is present in the Court and has stated that he has been compensated by the accused and he do not wish to pursue the present FIR. Taking into consideration the statement made by the complainant and the ratio of law laid down in Kulwinder Singh's (supra) case, present petition is accepted and the FIR along with subsequent proceedings is quashed. The parties are in agreement that no injury was suffered by Jagjit Singh @ Jaggi. He was only eye-witness of the occurrence. (KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA) 27-1-2009 JUDGE manju