IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21638 of 2010 RAJIV SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05. 12.10.2010 Petitioner being the husband is languishing in custody since 22.11.2009 in a case registered under Sections 304(B)/201/34 of the I.P.C. Initially the F.I.R. was instituted with the allegation of demand of Rs. 20,000/-, color T.V. and the alleged cruelty. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that the victim was burnt to death but subsequently the plea was taken that the victim was electrocuted. Though application was filed by the informant retracting from his initial version, but the impugned order reflects that the Vakalatnama was not properly attached with the alleged compromise petition. Considering the aforesaid submissions, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present. The prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected. However, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after examination of informant during trial. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)