THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA C.R.P.No.1628 of 2010 ORDER The petitioners, who are the defendants in O.S.No.57 of 2009, filed this revision against the judgment, dated 21.10.2010, passed by the learned VI Additional District Judge, Warangal at Mahabubabad in C.M.A.No.50 of 2009, whereby the order of dismissal, dated 26.06.2009, passed by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Narsampet, in I.A.No.88 of 2009 in O.S.No.57 of 2009 filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, was set aside. 2. The respondent herein instituted the said suit for perpetual injunction. Along with the said suit, he filed I.A.No.88 of 2009 seeking to grant interim injunction and the trial Court, while ordering notice to the petitioners herein, granted interim injunction on 05.06.2009. On notice, the petitioners/defendants have put in their appearance and filed a detailed counter affidavit. The learned Junior Civil Judge, after hearing the parties, vacated the said order of injunction vide order, dated 26.06.2009 in I.A.No.88 of 2009. Questioning the same, the respondent herein approached the lower appellate Court and filed C.M.A.No.50 of 2009 and the same was allowed setting aside the order of vacation. The same is questioned by the petitioners by filing this revision. 3. Though the respondent was served with notice, he has not chosen to appear either in person or through his counsel. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the material on record. 5. This Court, while issuing notice before admission on 26.04.2010, directed the parties to maintain status quo with regard to possession of the suit schedule property pending further orders. Apparently, it appears that the respondent/plaintiff has an order of injunction during the pendency of the proceedings before the Court below. In those circumstances, this Court is of the view that this revision can be disposed of, with a direction to the parties to maintain status quo with regard to possession of the suit schedule property pending disposal of the suit. Further, as it is a suit for injunction simplicitor, the trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit at the earliest, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the above directions, the Civil Revision petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J Date:26.11. 2010 sj