HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3590 of 2010 Between: Ongolu Malladri and another … Petitioners And Kopisetty Venkata Lakshmi … Respondent This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3590 of 2010 ORDER:- Petitioners/defendants filed this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution, to revise the order of the Senior Civil Judge, Peddapuram, dated 27.04.2010, passed in I.A.No.492 of 2006 in O.S.No.19 of 2006, whereby the I.A. filed for sending the suit promissory note along with the admitted signatures to the handwriting expert, has been dismissed. The suit itself is filed basing on the suit promissory note and the respondent/plaintiff examined P.Ws.1 to 3 from 15.12.2008 to 17.12.2008 and marked Exs.A1 to A4. But the defendants have not chosen to cross-examine the witnesses nor filed any such I.A. to send the documents to the handwriting expert prior to commencement of the trial. Further the 1st defendant, who was examined as D.W.1, in the cross-examination admitted the signatures of his wife in Ex.A1 and denied his signature on it. In the written statement also, it is stated that both the defendants executed some blank promissory notes in favour of Kadivala Sakunthala and the plaintiff, which they did not return and which were pressed into service. Once the defendants have not denied the signatures and in fact admitted that they signed the blank papers, nor have taken any plea to the said effect that they did not sign the blank documents, sending of the documents to the handwriting expert, does not arise. In view of the same, the order passed by the trial court does not suffer from any illegality, warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. _________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J 20th August 2010 lmv