IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3790 of 2008 BINOD DAS @ BINOD KUMAR DAS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 5.5.2008 The matter has come up under the heading “To Be Mentioned” at the instance of learned counsel for the petitioner, who points out that in the order dated 26.3.2008 while disposing of the writ application the direction has been issued to the Collector, Sitamarhi whereas it ought to have been issued to the Collector, Samastipur. In the said order dated 26.3.2008 in the last but one paragraph in the second line the reference to the Collector should be read as the Collector, Samastipur and not the Collector, Sitamarhi. The order dated 26.3.2008 is modified to the aforesaid extent. VPS (Ramesh kumar Datta,J.)