1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9752 OF 2009 Smt. Rajani Raghunath Cahav........ Petitioner versus Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & anr.........Respondent. Mr. D.A. Patil adv. for the Petitioner None for the Respondent. CORAM: A. P DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 21st November, 2009. P. C.: 1. Application moved by the respondent having been allowed, who claims to be owner and landlord in relation to the suit premises, for his impleadment as party defendant in a suit filed by the plaintiff/petitioner calling in question the legality and validity of a notice of demolition issued by the Corporation, this petition is filed. The trial court has held that as the applicant is the owner of the structure and landlord of the plaintiff in respect of the suit structure and he has an interest in the suit structure. Hence the trial court has come to the conclusion that being the landlord/the applicant is a proper party in the suit for perpetual injunction filed against the Municipal Corporation, touching the demolition notice. 2 2. Perused the order. The same does not call for any interference as a very possible view of the matter is taken. In the result the petition is summarily dismissed. (A. P. Deshpande, J.)