"^\ s IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fS) N0. ; 2-1 /2009 (S.B.) PETITIONER l-^^y ^^// ^t^" y-^A^ .•:'"-»t'0^-"" .r;'^'' .•' "^" .•••" ><y~ A--"' ^ RESPONDENTS Smt. Sumitra Kamal Patre, W/o Ramkumar Kamal Patre, aged about 32 years, Posted as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, Govt. Primary School, Mudapar, Distt. -Korba (C.G.), R/o Qtr. No. M- 171, Pump House Colony, Korba, Distt.-Korba (C.G.) VERSUS ^ : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^' 2. Director of Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Korba, Distt.- Korba (C.G.) 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Kasdol Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) ^ 5. District Education Officer, Korba, Distt.- Korba (C.G.) ^ 6. Block Education Officer, Korba, Distt.- Korba (C.G.) l^ 7. Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Korba, Distt.- Korba (C.G.) WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1. IBr. > HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH :_B3LASPUR WRIT PETITiON (S-, N.0.4315 OF 2008 •. PETiTiO^ER RESPONDENTS Smt Jltender Lamba Versus Staie of Chhatiisgarh & Others And W.P.(S) Nos.5981, 5448, 5450, 5451, 5483,5484. 5485, 5584, 575S,5785, 57S3,5805, 5813, 5815, 5819, 5820, 5828, 5839,5889, 5890, 5891, 6018, 3094,6204,S339, 6340, 6423, S438, 529Q.-5S18, 5533, 5S78, 5811, 56S1, 5591,5811,5817,5927, 5930, 8621 & SS22 of 2009. (Writ Petltlons under Article 22S of the Constitution of India) Ssngle Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri H.B. AgrawaS, Sr. Advocate with Ms Meera Jaiswal, Shri P.P. Sahu, Shri feteen Ssddiqui, Shri P.R. Patankar, Shrs Manoj Paranjape, Shri Uttam Pandey, Shri C.J.K. Rao, Shri Roop Naik, Shn A.S.Rajput, Shri K.S. Pawar, Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Shrl R.R. Soni, Shri V.K. Pandey and Shri Ashwani Shukia, Advocates for the respective petitioraers. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy. Advocate General for the State of ChhattJsgarh arad its authorlties. ORDER fCRAL) (Passed on this 12th day of November, 2009) 1. With the coraserat of learned counse! appearing tor the parties, the petltions are heard tmaliy. 2. In thss batch of matters it has been brought to the notice of the Court that the transfer orders have been passed wathout compSying with the polscy and in some cases the orders having been executed aSso requlre reconsideration. Shri Thakur, learned Dy. Advocate GeneraJ appearing for the State, on anstructioais, very falrly subinits that aSI the cases of the petitloners pending consideratlon before this Court shail be considered afresh, after arfording proper opportunity or hearing to the parties concerned, to examine asto whether the transfer 3. ^ orders have been passed in accordance with the policy and tiIS that tjme the petitloners heresn shall not be disturbed. 4. In vlew of foregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for the respective petttioners nothing survives In these petltions for adjudication. 5. Accordlngiy, the petstions being W.P. {S) Mos.4315, 5981, 5448, 5450,5451, 5483, 5484, 5485, 5S84, 5756, 5785, 5793, 5805, SS13, 5815,S8ia, 5820, 5825, 5839, 5S89, 5890, 5891,S018,S094, 8204, 8339,6340, S423, 6438, 5290, 5518, 5533, 5578, 5611, 56S1, 5591, 5811, 5817, 5927, 5930, 5821 & SS22 of 2009 are disposed of. However, on the basis of submission made by the learned Dy. Advocate General, it is made ciear that the petltioners hereira shaii contiraue on iheir respectlve piaces ot postlng. as obtalns today, tiii dssposal of their respectlve cases, sn accordance with law and ors its own merits. 6. sMo order asto costs. —— Gowri Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge ^-