WPSS No.304/2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala J. Mr. S. K. Mandal, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, the learned brief holder for the State. The learned counsel for the petitioner alleges that the respondents invited applications for two years B.T.C. training in which the eligibility criteria was that the candidate should be a graduate and should also be a Shiksha Mitra. The petitioner contends that she is working as a Shiksha Mitra and holds a Sahityaratna Degree from Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Prayag, which is equivalent to a graduate degree and consequently, entitled to be considered for the aforesaid B.T.C. training course. Having considered the matter the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file an appropriate representation alongwith a certified copy of this order before the authority concerned. If the petitioner moves such a representation, the authority will decide the representation of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order within two weeks from the date of the production of a certified copy of this order. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated:30.4.2010 Nishant