IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14695 of 2010 SUMAN KUMAR @ SUMAN KUMAR DAS S/O UDAN DAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 07.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 366 A/34 and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that from the narrative of the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., it appears to be a case of consent between the parties since it is not believable that any adult would be confined against her wishes for two months without it being detected by anyone. In view of such, let the petitioner, who is in custody since 29.11.2009 and has no criminal antecedent, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Pupri Sitamarhi, in connection with Nanpur P.S. case no. 33/2009, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailors will be a close - 2 - relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays and trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )