1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR JUDGMENT BHERU LAL VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. SB Criminal Revision Pet. No. 64 OF 2000 under Section 397 read with section 401 Cr.P.C. against the order dated January 7, 2000 of Special Court SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Cases) Kota in Criminal Appeal No.116 of 1991 whereby the order dated May 1, 1991 of Special Judicial Magistrate Kota in Criminal Case No. 371 of 1990 was upheld and maintained the conviction and sentence awarded against the petitioner for offence under section 326 IPC was reduced to One year RI and fine of Rs. 1,000 in default 2 months R.I. Date of Order : April 9, 2009 PRESENT HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA Mr. Mahesh Sharma, for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Shrimal, Public Prosecutor. BY THE COURT : This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner Bheru Lal against the order dated January 7, 2000 of Special Court SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Cases) Kota in Criminal Appeal No.116 of 1991 whereby the order dated May 1, 1991 of Special Judicial Magistrate Kota in Criminal Case No. 371 of 1990 was upheld and maintained the conviction and sentence awarded against the 2 petitioner for offence under section 326 IPC was reduced to One year RI and fine of Rs. 1,000 in default 2 months R.I. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has not challenged the conviction part of the judgment of the of Special Court SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Cases) Kota whereby the order dated May 1, 1991 of Special Judicial Magistrate Kota in Criminal Case No. 371 of 1990 was upheld and maintained the conviction and sentence awarded against the petitioner for offence under section 326 IPC was reduced to One year RI and fine of Rs. 1,000 in default 2 months R.I. The learned counsel for the petitioner made simple request to this court for reducing the period of sentence to the period already undergone by the petitioner in confinement, which is 24 days in the instant matter. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed this submission. The incident in the instant matter took place on September 13, 1980, which is 29 years ago. In these 3 circumstances while maintaining the conviction of the petitioner under section 326 IPC, his sentence is reduced to the period already under gone by him. The petitioner is on bail, his bail bonds stands canceled and he need not surrender. 3. For these reasons, the conviction of the petitioner under section 326 IPC is maintained but his sentence is reduced to the period already under gone by him. Since the petitioner is on bail he need not to surrender and his bail bonds stands discharged. As the main petition has been disposed the stay application also stands disposed. (Mahesh Chandra Sharma) J. OPPareek/