IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.123 of 2009 SMT.SHASHI PANDEY Versus SRI MITHILESHWAR TIWARI ----------- 3. 30-Jun-09 Nobody appears on behalf of the appellant to contest the objection raised by the stamp reporter that no appeal is maintainable against the interlocutory order of the family court which is under challenge in this appeal. On going through the legal provision in Section 19 of the Family Court’s Act-1984 and the order under appeal dated 21.11.2008 it is clear that the impugned order is interlocutory in nature whereby prayer for adjournment was refused and no appeal is maintainable against such order of the family court in view of the provisions in Section 19 of the Family Court’s Act-1984. In that view of the matter the objection of the stamp reporter is accepted and the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ.) (Anjana Prakash,J.)