1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ::: JUDGMENT 1 SBCWP NO 11751/2009 ARVIND KUMAR & ANR Vs. STATE & ORS 2 SBCWP NO 348/2010 MAHAINDAR GODARA Vs. STATE & ORS 3 SBCWP NO 356/2010 OM DUTT DAVE & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 4 SBCWP NO 682/2010 SAWITA SHARMA Vs. STATE & ORS 5 SBCWP NO 1551/2010 PRATIMA SHRANGI Vs. STATE & ORS 6 SBCWP NO 2857/2010 GOKAL RAM & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 7 SBCWP NO 3087/2010 ISHWAR DAN & ANR. Vs. STATE & ORS 8 SBCWP NO 3434/2010 NETA RAM & ORS. Vs. STATE & ORS 9 SBCWP NO 3438/2010 KARUNA KATARA & ANR. Vs. STATE & ORS 10 SBCWP NO 8363/2009 OMPRAKASH & ANR Vs. STATE & ORS 11 SBCWP NO 8378/2009 SMT. SITA & ORS. Vs. STATE & ORS 12 SBCWP NO 8551/2009 HARISH KUMAR JOHARI Vs. STATE & ANR 13 SBCWP NO 8558/2009 RANVEER PRASAD Vs. STATE & ORS 14 SBCWP NO 8582/2009 BHAGIRATH & ANR. Vs. STATE & ORS 15 SBCWP NO 8573/2009 HANS RAJ & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 16 SBCWP NO 8896/2009 KASI RAM & ORS. Vs. STATE & ORS 17 SBCWP NO 9009/2009 BHIKHA RAM & ORS. Vs. STATE & ORS 18 SBCWP NO 9018/2009 MANNA LAL GARASIYA Vs. STATE & ORS 19 SBCWP NO 9028/2009 BHINYA RAM & ORS. Vs. STATE & ORS 20 SBCWP NO 9031/2009 KRISHAN LAL & ORS. Vs. STATE & ORS 21 SBCWP NO 9032/2009 SATYAVIR SINGH & ORS. Vs. STATE & ORS 22 SBCWP NO 9042/2009 RADHA KUMARI Vs. STATE & ORS 23 SBCWP NO 9054/2009 RAJ KUMAR MALI & ORS. Vs. STATE & ORS 24 SBCWP NO 9078/2009 ASHOK KUMAR CHOUHAN & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 25 SBCWP NO 9081/2009 SNEHLATA SANWANIYA Vs. STATE & ORS 26 SBCWP NO 9084/2009 SMT. KAILASH GARG & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 27 SBCWP NO 9101/2009 MOTA RAM & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 28 SBCWP NO 9107/2009 MANJU RANI & ANR Vs. STATE & ORS 29 SBCWP NO 9108/2009 GOPI CHAND & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 30 SBCWP NO 9110/2009 JAYA JOSHI & ANR Vs. STATE & ORS 31 SBCWP NO 9112/2009 RAMNIWAS & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 32 SBCWP NO 9114/2009 HET RAM & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 33 SBCWP NO 9149/2009 DHRUVTA PATEL & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 34 SBCWP NO 9620/2009 ANURAGA GAUTAM & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 35 SBCWP NO 11070/2009 PREMLATA & ANR. Vs. STATE & ORS 36 SBCWP NO 11848/2009 ABDUL RAUF Vs. STATE & ORS 37 SBCWP NO 22/2010 JAS GIRI Vs. STATE & ORS 38 SBCWP NO 72/2010 KAMALESH KUMAR & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 39 SBCWP NO 73/2010 BHANWAR LAL PATEL & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 40 SBCWP NO 77/2010 HAWA SINGH & ORS. Vs. STATE & ORS 41 SBCWP NO 82/2010 RAJESH GHOTI & ORS. Vs. STATE & ORS 42 SBCWP NO 107/2010 POONMA RAM & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 43 SBCWP NO 135/2010 PAWAN SINGH & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 44 SBCWP NO 141/2010 GANESH PRASAD VAISHNAV & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 45 SBCWP NO 146/2010 PAPU PURI & ANR. Vs. STATE & ORS 46 SBCWP NO 199/2010 BHANWARA RAM & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 47 SBCWP NO 229/2010 GANPAT SINGH Vs. STATE & ORS 48 SBCWP NO 243/2010 JASSA RAM HARIJAN & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 2 49 SBCWP NO 248/2010 JETHU SINGH & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 50 SBCWP NO 282/2010 ANGREJ SINGH SANDHU & ORS. Vs. STATE & ORS 51 SBCWP NO 328/2010 OM PRAKASH Vs. STATE & ORS 52 SBCWP NO 318/2010 SHISHPAL SARAN & ORS. Vs. STATE & ORS 53 SBCWP NO 366/2010 REKHA KHANDELWAL Vs. STATE & ORS 54 SBCWP NO 380/2010 NARENDRA SINGH Vs. STATE & ORS 55 SBCWP NO 408/2010 BABU LAL RAJPUROHIT Vs. STATE & ORS 56 SBCWP NO 409/2010 DHAN SINGH Vs. STATE & ORS 57 SBCWP NO 423/2010 RAJENDER KUMAR & ANR Vs. STATE & ORS 58 SBCWP NO 503/2010 MISS SAMTA SHARMA & ORS. Vs. STATE & ORS 59 SBCWP NO 529/2010 SURENDRA VISHNOI & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 60 SBCWP NO 547/2010 MONIKA GUGLANI & ORS Vs. STATE & ORS 61 SBCWP NO 942/2010 KHETA RAM & ANR. Vs. STATE & ORS 62 SBCWP NO 1116/2010 RAJ MOHAN & ORS. Vs. STATE & ORS 63 SBCWP NO 1574/2010 BHANWAR SINGH RATHORE & ANR Vs. STATE & ORS 64 SBCWP NO 3319/2010 INDRAJ KUMAR Vs. STATE & ORS 65 SBCWP NO 3335/2010 TODA RAM & ANR. Vs. STATE & ORS 66 SBCWP NO 3339/2010 MEHRAJ BANU Vs. STATE & ORS Date of order : 5.4.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. S/Sh. Rakesh Matoria, Rameshwar Dave, Rohitash Singh, GS Bhati, NK Gagua, Subhash Kachhawah, BR Bera, SD Singh, Heera Lal, RN Beniwal, BN Kalla, PS Chundawat, KL Parjapat, Deepak Maneria, Govind Suthar, SS Bishnoi, NL Hivania, Sanjay vyas, Gopal Acharaya, Firoz Khan, Pankaj Sharma, AD Charan, BL Dudi, DS Gharsana, JR Patel, NA Rajpurohit, Sajjan Singh, Ravindra Singh, Sandeep Saruparia, HS Sidhu, Sachin Bhati, Mahendra Prajapat, DS Deora, TR Choudhary, RK Choudhary, VR Choudhary, AK Choudhary, Ajay Vyas, Shambhoo Singh, Sanker Parjapat, RS Choudary, BL Choudhary, Ravindra Singh, Rajesh Choudhary, Balveer Singh, LN Mathur, Shambhoo Singh, CS Rajpurohit, Shardul Bishnoi, CS Kotwani, OP Bishnoi, PD Vaishnav, Deepak Nehra, JDS Bhati, Rakesh Arora, Inderjeet Yada and Durga Ram Vishnoi for the petitioner(s). Mr. RL Jangid, Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Rajesh Bhati, Asstt to AAG. for the respondent State. <><><> The learned counsel for the parties submit that part of Condition No.4 has been stayed by the Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court Bench, Jaipur, however, that will 3 not affect the fate of these writ petitions and both the counsel submit that similar directions, subject to the effect of the interim order as passed by the Division Bench of the Jaipur Bench of the High Court, may be passed in these matters also. In view of the above reasons, all these writ petitions are disposed of in the light of the directions issued in the S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 2579/09 Devendra Kumar & ors. v. State and connected matters decided vide judgment dated 15.5.2009 and in the light of the decision given in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4652/09 and connected matters decided on 8.5.2009 with further clarification that the petitioners may satisfy the competent authority, who may be District Education Officer or the Block Elementary Education Officer about the genuineness of the documents as well as continuity of their working in the year 2008- 2009. The directions given in the above writ petitions are incorporated in these writ petitions which are as under:- I. During continuation of the work, as detailed out hereinabove, the invocation of the last extension is arbitrary and illegal; and the consequential automatic termination orders of the petitioners are set aside. II. The RPSC/DPC selected candidates/employees are still not available and next academic sessions is about to start; even urgent temporary appointments under Rule 28 of the Rules of 1971 are not possible due to short span of one month and a half left to start with the process of admission and academic session, therefore, as per the aims 4 and objects of the Scheme, respondents are directed to consider the cases of the petitioners for continuation in service till regularly selected candidates from RPSC/persons selected and recommended by the DPC for promotion are made available in the light of the above observations; III. Even in case of appropriate order of continuation in service till regularly selected candidates from RPSC/DPC selected persons are available, the petitioners are not entitled for wages of the vacations, in other words, when the schools are closed. IV. In case the regularly selected candidates from RPSC/persons selected and recommended by the DPC for promotion are made available, then the respondents can terminate services of the petitioners after preparation of the seniority list on the State level as per their date of appointment and merit assigned to them, by following the principle of 'last come first go' to the extent of availability of the selected candidates and while doing so, the respondents will keep the interest of the present students and prospective students in view.” It is further made clear that the portion which has been stayed by the Division Bench of this Court shall remain stayed in the light of the order of the Division Bench and that is about the preparation of the seniority list at State level . The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners are also directed to submit the court fee of Rs.25/- for each of the petitioners in case it is a joint writ petition and certified copy of this order may be issued to the petitioners only subject to payment of this Court fee. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. 5 mlt/cpgoyal 6 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO._______/ Date of order : 5.4.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. S/Sh. Rakesh Matoria, Rameshwar Dave, Rohitash Singh, GS Bhati, NK Gagua, Subhash Kachhawah, BR Bera, SD Singh, Heera Lal, RN Beniwal, BN Kalla, PS Chundawat, KL Parjapat, Deepak Maneria, Govind Suthar, SS Bishnoi, NL Hivania, Sanjay vyas, Gopal Acharaya, Firoz Khan, Pankaj Sharma, AD Charan, BL Dudi, DS Gharsana, JR Patel, NA Rajpurohit, Sajjan Singh, Ravindra Singh, Sandeep Saruparia, HS Sidhu, Sachin Bhati, Mahendra Prajapat, DS Deora, TR Choudhary, RK Choudhary, VR Choudhary, AK Choudhary, Ajay Vyas, Shambhoo Singh, Sanker Parjapat, RS Choudary, BL Choudhary, Ravindra Singh, Rajesh Choudhary, Balveer Singh, LN Mathur, Shambhoo Singh, CS Rajpurohit, Shardul Bishnoi, CS Kotwani, OP Bishnoi, PD Vaishnav, Deepak Nehra, JDS Bhati, Rakesh Arora, Inderjeet Yada and Durga Ram Vishnoi for the petitioner(s). . Mr. RL Jangid, Addl. Advocate General with Mr.Rajesh Bhati , Asstt to AAG, for the respondent State. <><><> This writ petition is disposed of. [see separate judgment in S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11751/2009- Arvind Kumar & Anr. Vs. State & Ors.] decided today itself. By order Court master.