IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.: 8249 of 2008. Decided on: 29.11.2010. __________________________________________________________ Salig Ram Negi. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Bimal Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondent No.1. None for respondents No.2 and 3. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Mr. Bimal Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition has become infructuous due to subsequent events. However, by way of abundant precaution, it is made clear that since the petitioner has worked against the post, no recovery shall be effected from him. 2. Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 29, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.