WP(C) 4670/2004 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY None appears for the petitioners when the case is called. The respondents are re presented by Mr. M.K. Misra, learned Standing Counsel. The petitioners who served as stipendary teachers in Lakhimpur District seek direction for payment of their withheld stipends of varying periods from Fe bruary 1986 to 5th March 2004 and also for release of unpaid salaries. As none has appeared to represent the petitioners, this Court is left wi th no option but to dismiss the writ petition for non-prosecution. However considering the judgment rendered by this Court in Sudhendu Moha n Talukdar vs. State of Assam reported in 2006 (2) GLT 216, the dismissal of the writ petition should not come in the way of consideration of the petitioners’ c laim for alleged unpaid wages, by the committee constituted in pursuant to the j udgment of this Court in Sudhendu Mohan Talukdar (Supra). Naturally, considerat ion can be made only when the petitioners move the committee with an appropriate representation. With the above order the case is disposed of.