IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P. No. 2548 of 2010 Decided on: 12th July, 2010. Umesh Madhosh ….Petitioner Versus State of HP & ors …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Bhupender S. Thakur, Advocate For the State: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. ____________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner is aggrieved since ad hoc service rendered by the petitioner, followed by the regular service, is not counted for the purpose of eligible service benefits. It is submitted that issue is covered in favour of the petitioner by the decision of this court rendered in Paras Ram Vs. State of H.P., which has been implemented by the State. Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed as follows. 2. There will be a direction to the first respondent to examine the case of the petitioner and in case the petitioner is similarly situated, as the petitioner referred to in the case above, the petitioner herein also will be given the similar and eligible benefits. Needful in this behalf shall be done by the second respondent within a period of two months on the production of copy of this judgment alongwith the copy of the writ petition. 3. The writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 12th July, 2010(K) (Justice Kuldip Singh), Judge