IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.54788 of 2007 1. MAHESH ROY 2. MUKESH ROY 3. CHANDAN KUMAR @ CHANDAN RAI 4. RAJPATI KUMARI @ RAJO KUMARI 5. RAMAWATI KUMARI @ RAMPATI KUMARI 6. SHANTI DEVI. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 26.11.2009. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners have come to this court for quashing order dated 8.7.2005, passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in Goroul Police Station case no. 92/2003 by which learned Magistrate after differing with the police report issued process against the petitioner for facing trial. The petitioners submit that there is no enough materials on record to differ with the police report and to take cognizance of the office under sections 302/34 I.P.C. in the aforesaid case. On perusal of impugned order, I find that the learned Magistrate has given reasons for differing with the police report. As such, the instant Cr.Misc.case is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to take the points at the time of framing of charge. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)