IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1587 of 2009 Smt. Indira Kumari W/o Shyam Sunder Prasad resident of village Danapur, P.O.- Paithana, P.S.- Paithana Ishlampur, District-Nalanda. ………Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. District Superintendent of Education, Nalanda. 3. Sub-Division Education Officer, Nalanda. 4. Block Development Officer, Chandi, Nalanda. 5. Block Education Extension Officer, Bihar Shariff. 6. Chief Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Bihar Shariff, Nalanda. 7. Chief Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Hilsa, Nalanda. 8. Chief Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Ishlampur, Nalanda. ………Respondents. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. R.K. Rajan, Adv. For the State : Mr. S.B. Kr, S.C.-16. ----------- 02. 02.02.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner’s grievance is that his claim has wrongly been neglected in the matter of appointment as Teacher in Nagar Parishad, Nagar Panchayat and Gram Panchayat. According to petitioner he was entitled for 61.01 points but still he was not appointed whereas candidates with lesser marks have been appointed. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that from the documents annexed it appears that the training certificate in favour of the petitioner is from an institution - 2 - which was de-recognized long back. The claim of the petitioner requires inquiry into facts and Annexure-5 shows that petitioner has already approached Appellate Tribunal at Nalanda which has statutory power to decide such disputes. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of without going into merits. The appellate authority at Nalanda is expected to decide the claims of the petitioner in accordance with law at an early date preferably within a period of three months from the date of communication of a copy of this order. Vikash/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)