IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14371 of 2010 M/S KEMS SERVICE PVT.LTD. 76 B-1-B Mauryalok Complex Dak Bunglow Road, Patna 800001 through the Managing Director Shri Mohan Kumar Khandelwal… Petitioner Versus 1.THE BANK OF BARODA , Baroda Corporation Center C-26, G Block Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E) Mumbai-400051 through the Chairman. 2. Mr. R.K. Bakshi, Executive Director, Corporate Office, Bank of Baroda, Baroda Corporate Center, C 26, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex bandra (E), Mumbai-400051. 3. Mr. N.S. Shrinath, Executive Director, Corporate Office, bank of Baroda, Baroda Corporate Center, C 26, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai-400051. 4. General Manager, Head Office, Bank of Baroda, 6th Floor, Suraj Plaza-1, Maganwadi, Sayajiganj, Baroda-390005. 5. Director, Head Office, Baroda House, Mandavi Baroda, Gurat,390006. 6. Mr. Atul Agarwal, Director, S10/11,City Center,63/2,D Mall, Kanpur. 7. Mr. Dharmendra Bhandari, Director,91 Prabhat Colony, Santacruz, East Mumbai-400055. 8. Dy. General Manager, Bank of Baroda, Anand Vihar, 5th Floor West Boring Canal Road, Patna-800001. 9. Branch Manager, bank of Baroda, Patna Main Branch, Fraser Road, Patna-800001. …… Respondents. ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Senior Advocate Mr.Abhay Kumar, Advocate For respondent Bank: Mr.Ratnesh Nandan Sinha, Advocate ---- 2. 1.9.2010 The sole grievance of the petitioner at this stage is that his representations dated 31.1.2009, 13.7.2009 and 31.7.2010 filed before the authorities of the Bank have not been considered and his grievance has not been redressed. It appears that on the basis of a cheque issued by the petitioner an amount of Rs.100.24 Lakhs has been withdrawn from the account of the - 2 - petitioner on 15.1.2009 by issuing banker’s cheques/ drafts in favour of ten persons. The petitioner lodged an F.I.R. with respect to the same in the Kotwali P.S. on 20.1.2009, in which he had raised suspicion regarding the involvement of one of his employees along with others. The petitioner had raised various grievances before the Bank also claiming that the request form for the issuance of banker cheques/ drafts has not been signed by him. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the authorities of the Bank have not yet disposed of the representations filed by the petitioner and unless they do the same, it will not be possible for him to approach the higher authorities or the other forum in the matter. Learned counsel for the respondent Bank, on the other hand, submits that the Bank has already given photo copies of the documents that had been sought by the petitioner and it has no objection to giving reply to the representations filed by the petitioner. In the above circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the authorities of the respondent Bank to consider and - 3 - dispose of the representations of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )