IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2217 of 2011 AJAY RAI AND ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 149, 323, 448,379, 386 and 436 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that eight accused persons including the petitioners to have come to the informant’s house and Binod Rai and Raj Kumar Rai untied the Ox of the informant. Binod Rai pressed the neck of the informant and Hriday Rai, Satya Narayan Rai and Mahesh Rai took the grains and cash from the house of the informant and then Binod Rai lit fire the house of the informant. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the impugned order reflects that the police found the case true only under Sections 147, 148, 323, 379 and 411 of the I.P.C. but there is no accusation in the F.I.R. against the petitioners under Sections 379 and 411 of the I.P.C. There was previous enmity as admitted by the informant - 2 - in concluding portion of F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners, Ajay Rai and Ram Rai @ Ram Kumar Rai be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Bajpatii P.S. Case No. 133 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Pupri at Sitamarhi, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P. C. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)