IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17597 of 2010 ARJUN PRASAD SON OF LATE RAM LAL MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHHOTI PAITHANA, P.O. BARI PAITHANA, P.S. ISLAMPUR, DISTRICT NALANDA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, INDUSTRY BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR, HANDLOOM AND SERICULTURE BIHAR, PATNA. 3. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR INDUSTRY (SERICULTURE) BHAGALPUR. 4. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL OF BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 02. 25.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that petitioner upon superannuation on 31st of July 2009 from the post of Pilot Project Officer under the respondent no. 3, no retiral dues have been settled as yet. Learned counsel for the State submits that the claims of the petitioner are not clear. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in the writ application, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 3 with a copy to respondent no. 2 within a period of four weeks. In case such representation is filed 2 within a period of four weeks stating the claims as highlighted in the writ application as also the copy of the relevant document, if any, in support of the claims with certified copy of the present order, the above respondent shall consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievance of the petitioner may be settled and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)