IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29140 of 2010 MOBARAK ANSARI, S/O SAHDAUN MIAN, R/O VILLAGE BANJARIA JITPUR, P.S. SEMRA, DISTRICT WEST CHAMPARAN. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 6.12.2010. Heard Mr. Manan Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State. The sole petitioner, who is an accused in connection with Bagaha Bhairoganj P.S. Case No.460 of 2009 for the offences under Section 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. While pressing the bail petition, it was submitted by learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that it is un-believable that kidnappers, while demanding ransom, will disclose their own name. It was further submitted that it is true that the petitioner was shown to be arrested, while kidnapped persons were recovered, but the victim has simply disclosed the name of the petitioner. The petitioner was not put on Test Identification Parade. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is having clean antecedent. On the aforesaid ground, it has been prayed to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State, has vehemently opposed the prayer of the petitioner. He has referred different paragraphs of the case diary. It was submitted that two persons were kidnapped by the accused persons and they were kept in a dense 2 forest and while they were being carried to different place, police arrived. Thereafter, from the accused side also, firing was opened upon the police. However, after some time, three accused persons including the petitioner were arrested. However, two accused persons fled away. In view of the seriousness of the allegation and materials brought on record, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail is rejected. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)