P IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16311 of 2008 JANARDAN SAH & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 10.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. Apprehending their arrest in Rajaun P.S. Case No. 30/2008, registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 364 and 120B of the IPC, the petitioners Janardan Sah, Umesh Sah, Gunna Sah @ Ganesh Sah @ Munna Sah and Pankaj Sah, who have been refused anticipatory bail by the Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur, have filed this petition for anticipatory bail. It has been submitted that petitioners have falsely been implicated and wife and son of the victim, who are said to have disappeared after the execution of the sale deed, have not lodged any complaint at Bhagalpur. The complainant and his family members have also signed as witness in the document so created in favour of the petitioners by the victim in the year 1994. In the facts and circumstances, I am not persuaded to grant them anticipatory bail and prayer for anticipatory bail is, accordingly, rejected. However, consideration of regular bail shall not be influenced by this rejection order. Sanjeet (Subash Chandra Jha, J.)