[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1009/2002 DHUKAL RAM Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. DATE: 02.05.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE Mr. S.K. Singodiya for the complainant-petitioner. Mr. B.S. Chhaba, Public Prosecutor for the State. Mr. Anoop Dhand with Mr. Manish Sharma for the accused-respondents. **** The present criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. is directed against the judgment dated 13.05.2002 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Jhunjhunu in Criminal Appeal No. 48/2002 (Old No. 62/2000), whereby the appeal filed by the accused- respondents Nos. 2 to 4 has been partly allowed and benefit of probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act has been extended in favour of the accused-respondents, whereas vide judgment dated 03.10.2000 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawalgarh in Criminal Case No. 171/95, the accused-respondent No.4 Smt. Mani Devi @ Munni Devi was convicted for the offence under Sections 447, 324 and 323/34 IPC and the remaining accused-respondents Subhash Chandra and Smt. Bhagwani Devi were convicted for the offences under Sections 447, 323 and 324/34 IPC and sentenced for the aforesaid offences. [2] The Appellate Court while extending the benefit of probation in favour of the accused- respondents, directed them to pay Rs. 2,000/- to injured Smt. Sushila Devi W/o Shankar Lal and Rs. 1,000/- to injured Surendra S/o Shankar Lal as compensation. I have heard learned counsel for the complainant-petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State as well as counsel appearing for the accused-respondents and have also gone through the impugned judgments dated 03.10.2000 and 13.05.2002 passed by the trial Court and Appellate Court respectively. Although the Appellate Court has not properly appreciated the evidence and the injury reports and has granted the benefit of probation in favour of the accused-respondents under the Probation of Offenders Act, but at this stage, in the interest of parties, without interfering with the impugned judgment passed by the Appellate Court, this Court deem it proper to enhance the compensation amount awarded in favour of injured Smt. Sushila Devi from Rs. 2,000/- to Rs. 10,000/- and from Rs. 1,000/- to Rs. 5,000/- in favour of injured Surendra. The accused-respondents are directed to make the payment of the enhanced compensation amount to the injured after adjusting the amount already paid by them, within a period of three [3] months, failing which the accused-respondents will have to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. The impugned judgment dated 13.05.2002 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jhunjhunu is modified to the extent as indicated herein above. The criminal revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. (K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/