CRR No.1633 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRR No.1633 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:- 26.08.2011 State of Haryana ....Petitioner Vs. Anil Kumar ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present:- Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana, for the State. ***** A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) Assailed in this petition is the judgment dated 20.10.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc) Fast Track Court, Rewari, acquitting the accused-respondent while accepting his appeal preferred against the judgment of conviction dated 14.02.2007 and order of sentence dated 15.02.2007. The allegations against the accused-respondent (herein referred to as 'the respondent') are that he had kidnapped the prosecutrix and on the intervention of Nanak Chand, she was got scot free and the case was registered against the accused. In order to support the case, the prosecutrix appeared in the witness box as PW-3, but she did not name the person who had kidnapped her. It is not known as to what for the prosecutrix concealed his name. The only other witness to the kidnapping is CRR No.1633 of 2010 (O&M) 2 Nanak Chand, but he had not supported the prosecution version. Even the complainant Satnarain (PW-4), while appearing in the witness box, had only stated that he had come to know about the incident through telephonic call from one Amar Bahadur when he was at his factory. As such, the Appellate Court appears to have taken right view of the matter while acquitting the accused. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. (A.N.JINDAL) 26th August, 2011 JUDGE ajp