[y-^) IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) N0. ^' 4-3-3 72010 PETITIONER \^-^r ^F\\Ky^ ^ ^-^^ ^-^" RESPONDENTS -"<- .<^^^%'N A^ " <^ 71; V3~'^ Mohd. Salim Javed, S/o. Shri Mohd. Muskaa, aged about 36 years, Occupation- Service, Panchayat Karnii (Secretary) Gram. Panchayat Mehata, Janpad Panchayat, Konta, Distt. South Bastar Dantewada, (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat South Bastar, Dandtewada (C.G.) 3. Chief Executive Ofiicer, Janpad Panchayat Konta Distt. South Bastar, Dandtewada (C.G.) 4. Sarapanch Grani Panchayat, Mehata, Block- Konta Distt- South Bastar Dentewada (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA T 1 ^B^,^i-ite-22; ^-.^./ •^oET ^|<4|^|<L|^ ^Tii^^Ko, [®icrll<H^< ^RS^^S ^h^ich 3TT^T t^ra? .0,?..^^.^ 200 Lz^ •f^^s' 3TT^T^T ^icf, 3T1^T 5h^ich <lf^a '^ Af ^,B.,LHOrBLB_JUSTICEMR._PmT!NK1 w^i'^mw^l^T 6-12-2010 Shri Subash Yajiav, counsel ibr tl Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, P.L. for Challenge in the present petit |i6.8.2010 (Annexure P/l) by whid [uspended. Contention of the counsei for ^etitioner has been suspen4ed on the tlransfer order whereas the said traxii |uashed by this Court. He submits tha< tl|ie petitioner. |the State. tion is to the order dated iji the petitioner has been ^as been quashed there was no occas the petitioner is that the ^r'ound of not cariying out the ^fer order has alrea.dy been once the transfer order itself |on for the authority- to issue tyspens3.cn order. State counsel submits that ^ppeal lies and he has no objection if t^ l|>efore the appellate authority. /In view of the above, counsel for ijnay be permitted to withdraw this p^ 4-ppropriate appeal. Accordingly, the petitic-n is disn'l iberty as aforesaid. If the petitioner period of ten days from the date of asfc.inst (pxpected form the competent authority l{)eriod of three weeks from the date of fil 1 It is made clear that this Court V\ cj)n merits of the case and the authority 1|o decide the appeal strictly in accordanl CM^(<rt<fl<l iTF^f ^ fe^ <f^l<^.i< '^^rf;<R3TT^T ^RDIWAKER rec^ipt =F the suspensioxi order, |e petitioner prefers an appeal, [he petitioner submits th.at he ^tition with liberty to flle an [isaed as withdrawn with the tprefers any appeal within a. of copy of this order it is to decide the same within a ing of the appeal. las not expressed any opinion concerned would be at liberty ^e with law. Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge [^ '^-^