C.R.No.4787 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURTOF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH. C.R.No.4787 of 2010 Date of decision:27.9.2010 Atma Singh ...Petitioner vs Bahal Singh ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG. --- Present: Mr.Mohd.Yousaff, Advocate, for the petitioner -- Rakesh Kumar Garg,J.(Oral) The petitioner, who is defendant No.2 before the trial Court, has filed this petition challenging the impugned order passed on an application under Order 39 rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, whereby an interim injunction has been granted in favour of the plaintiff- respondent. Notice of motion was issued to respondent No.1 vide order dated 31.8.2010 and he was ordered to be served by way of dasti. Petitioner was also granted liberty to serve respondent No.1 through counsel who was representing him in the trial Court. On 20.9. 2010, it was stated before this Court that dasti notices issued to respondent No.1 were sent to the petitioner who in turn deposited the same with the processing agency at Malerkotla, and the report on the summons was supposed to be sent to this Court directly. The case was adjourned for today and the concerned authority was sent a reminder C.R.No.4787 of 2010 2 seeking his report on the dasti summons. Mr.M.D.S.Dhillopn, Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division), Malerkotla vide his memo No.304 dated 25.9.2010, has submitted that no such notices/summons from this Court were received by the Nazir of his Court for effecting service. Thus, in view of the fact that the petitioner has failed to serve the respondent and has mis-stated the facts before this Court, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order. Dismissed. ( Rakesh Kumar Garg) Judge September 27, 2010 rk