1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4329 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.175 OF 2009 Shaikh Shahid Shaikh Hamid .. Applicant Versus Naziya Begum w/o Shaikh Shahid and anr. .. Respondents Shri K.P.Chawre, Advocate holding for Shri P.D.Suryawanshi, Advocate for applicant Shri K.G.Patil, A.P.P. for State CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND R.K. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 11th DECEMBER 2009 PER COURT 1. This application has been filed by the applicant who has filed Criminal Revision No.175 of 2009. By this application the applicant prays that this Criminal Revision Petition be placed before the appropriate Bench of this Court. It appears that when this Criminal Revision Application came to be filed and circulated before the learned Single Judge, the learned Single Judge by order dated 12.8.2009 directed that in the light of Rule 2-C of Chapter I of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules and under Section 19(3) of the Family Court’s Act, 1984, the appeal would be required to be presented before the Division Bench. 2 2. The learned Counsel for the applicant contends that in the light of Section 19(2) and (4), no appeal is maintainable but a revision is maintainable. As per Rule 2-C of Chapter I of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, the revision is required to be heard by the Division Bench hearing first appeals. The Revision obviously, prima facie, appears to us to be maintainable in the light of Section 19 of the Family Court’s Act. Registry to, therefore, place this revision for admission before the Bench assigned with and hearing appeals under the Family Court’s Act. Application allowed to the extent indicated above. ( R.K.DESHPANDE, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) (vvr/4329.09criappln)