IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45188 of 2010 PRAMOD KUMAR @ PRAMOD KUMAR SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. ----------- 4. 26.05.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 24.07.2010 in a case registered under Sections 419, 420, 467,379,471, 120B of the I. P. C., Section 8/16 of the N.D.P.S. Act, Section 27(b)(ii), 27(d), 28, 28A, 27(d), 28(a) and 27(c) of the Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment)Act. The accusation is of storage and doing business of spurious medicines. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the recovery has been made from Vinay Singh and the petitioner was the employee of Vinay Singh and Vinay Singh has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 4875 of 2011 by this Court. Moreover, analyst report with regard to seized medicines has still not come. It is submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let 2 the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M., Patna, in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 329 of 2010. Learned court below will positively cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner defaults for three consecutive occasions during trial. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)