IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2664 of 2010 SUSHIL KUMAR CHAUDHARY S/O SHRI UDAY KANT CHAUDHARY R/O VILL.- HANUMAN NAGAR, STATION ROAD, MADHUBANI, DISTT.- MADHUBANI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY OF SANSKRIT SHIKSHA BOARD BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE MADHUBANI 4. HEAD MASTER OF DURGA BHAWAN SANSKRIT PRIMARY SAH MIDDLE SCHOOL, RAHIKA, DISTT.- MADHUBANI ----------- 02. 08.12.2010 It is apparent from the pleadings and the prayer made in the writ application that the cause of action for the petitioner for the first time arose way back in the year 1986 and the petitioner waited till his superannuation to claim the difference of salary. The earliest evidence is that he has moved the authorities in 1999. Thereafter also it has taken 11 years for the petitioner to realize that there is a High Court where relief can be sought. In the above circumstances, this Court is not enthused to exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and that too in favour of the petitioner, who is not conscious about his right or is willing to fight at the appropriate time. If the petitioner wants to pursue the matter before other forum, he can do so. The Court will not come in the way. The writ application is dismissed with above liberty. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)