IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM Nos. 2599-2600-CII of 2011 in/and Civil Revision No. 2093 of 2010 Date of decision: February 23, 2011 Sodhi Ram .. Petitioner Vs. Khushi Mohd. and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Balram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anish Setia, Advocate for the respondents. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) Civil Misc. applications No.2599-2600-CII of 2011 are allowed as prayed for subject to all just exceptions. This petition assails the order dated 6.3.2010 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Jalandhar dismissing the execution petition for the decree for possession. Sodhi Ram-petitioner (objector) is the brother of Piara Lal judgment debtor. The petitioner claims himself to be the owner of the property on the basis of the agreement to sell dated 6.4.1965 allegedly executed by Piara Lal in his favour. However, he had earlier filed a suit for specific performance of the agreement to sell against the respondents which was dismissed on 5.3.1998 by the court of Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Jalandhar and copy of the said judgment has been placed on the record. It has also not been denied that the appeal against the said judgment was also dismissed on 23.4.2002. As such, now the petitioner cannot claim his right on the basis of the same agreement to sell which has also been ignored by the court up to the appeal level. In any case, agreement to sell does not confer any title. The objection petition appears to have been filed by Sodhi Ram in connivance with Piara Lal in order to delay the fruits of the decree which may be awarded to the respondents. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. February 23, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge