IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO : 794 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 23/06/2008 in WP NO : 15435 OF 2005 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Joogunta Penchalaiah S/o.Kondaiah R/o.Dr.No.11-8-26, Aadi Andhra Veedhi Kavali Town and Mandal, nellore District. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The District Collector, Nellore District, Nellore. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kavali Division, Nellore District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer Kavali Mandal, Nellore District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.A.V.V.S.N.MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO : 794 of 2008 ORDER: (Per Justice B Prakash Rao) Heard learned counsel for appellant and learned Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignments) and at their request the appeal is taken up for ﬁnal disposal at the stage of admission. The appellant herein is unsuccessful writ petitioner, sought writ of mandamus inter-alia assailing the action on the part of the respondents in dispossessing him from the land admeasuring Ac.2.65 cents covered by “D” form patta No. 968 of 1995 of Budam Gunta village, Kavali mandal, Nellore district as illegal. After ﬁling of the counter aﬃdavit, the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition, especially taking note of the fact that the petitioner/appellant herein is trying to place reliance on a fabricated patta and no right would be vested in him. Hence, the present appeal. Having heard the learned counsel for appellant and on perusal of the material and in view of the ﬁndings staring at the appellant, this Court would not show any indulgence especially in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. The aspects as to whether the documents are forged and whether patta pass book obtained by the petitioner is genuine are matters required to be gone into by the competent authority after holding an enquiry. In view of the same, we do not ﬁnd any merit warranting interference of this Court. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed. However, respondents are at liberty to conduct an enquiry after issuing notice to the writ petitioner/appellant and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. ________________ B.PRAKASH RAO,J _______________ R. KANTHA RAO,J DATE:8.9.2008 Tvk THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO : 794 of 2008 Date: 8.9.2008