m TH gm sang? w wa§§gg§cz;~ E A”; ’éii "§?{f§ wagxg. [25.93 g 2&5 ljefit§cri6r ‘Smt. Empati ’Sahu Wfs ’Shri "i‘uhup Ram ’S’ahu; Aged abau’t 3 i years, Vei‘sug gyx He’afth ' éhii Few" y ‘Qe’p’a’rt"m eirit, Maiitraiaya, Raifwé‘r, “Sis: ’: Ra’ipar4(c;<c}g) f2 The Direc’tér, aiiée6£orai€e b? Heath Séfvfce Raxpar mgt : Emacai “’3 Em Efhief *Me’diiééf and Heath Bist : Bastari{-€>.&} R/u DNK Cciony Kcmia‘gaisn', 5§s€ : Bastar — {SQ}; ‘ / gtate of chhattisgagh TEii-h’u'gh The $ecre‘tary AFK HIGH COURT OF CHHATT‘SGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1259 OF 2006 PETITIONERS Smt. Dropati Sahu Versus State of Chh‘attisgarh & others (Writ Petition under Articie 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon’bie‘Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :— Shri Praful Bharat, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State. RESPONDENTS ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 28‘“ day ofApriI, 2010) Heard learned counsel for the parties. Challenge in this petition is t'o the order dated 20/10/2006 (Annexure P—9), passed by the Chief Medical & Health Officer, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, whereby the candidature of the petitioner for selection on the post of Multipurpose Health Worker (Woman) was rejected. 2. Shri Bharat, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that pursuant to the advertisement dated 9/11/2005 (Annexure P-5). the petitioner made an application for selection and recruitment On the post of Multipurpose Health Worker (Woman). The essential qualification prescribed in the advertisement was 10‘“ Class pass in 10+2 scheme and under old system of Higher Secondary passed with Physics, Chemistry and Biology subjects. The petitioner has obtained Prathma Examination Certificate from Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Prayag, having subjects of Maths, Home Science, General Science, Political Science and English. The said certificate is equivalent to the Class 10‘“ Examination Certificate as well as Higher Secondary School Examination Certificate under the old system. Thus, rejection of the candidature of the petitioner on the ground of not having 10‘“ class pass examination certificate or Higher Secondary School Certificate under the old system is bad and illegal. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State submits that firstly the educational qualification was 10‘“ class pass Examination Certificate in 1O + 2 system or Higher Secondary School Examination Certificate under the old system with Physics, Chemistry and Biology subjects. There was no provision for havingiequivalent qualification. 'Thus, the Prathma examination Certificate was neither equivalent to 10‘“ Class pass Examination Certificate in 1O + 2 system nor Higher Secondary Schooi Exammahon Cemftcate under the old en the petmoner has not passed Prathma exammatlon With the subjects of Physms ubjects of Maths Home Sctence system Learned counsel further submits that ev Chemistry and Biology, but With the s General Solence and Enghsh Thus the petitioner was not ehgtble for n the post of Multipurpose Health Worker selectlon and appomtment o (W)- 4. Havmg heard learned counsel of) the parties perused the pleadings and the documents appended thereto lt Is apparent that the petltroner dld not possess the requtStte quallfloatron as prescribed In the advertlsement I e 10‘“ Class Examination Certificate In 10 + 2 system . Higher Secondary School Examination Certificate under the old froation The t to 10‘“ class examination certificate in 10 + 2 or Higher Secondary School Examination certificate, the same cannot be held as the reqUiSIte Further, the petitioner» has not passed Prathma system There was no prowsmn for equwalent quali Prathma Examination certificate even if it is equivalen qualification. Examination Certificate with the required subjects eg. Physics, cisi'on of the respondent authorities Chemistry and Biology Thus the de to reject the candidature of the petitioner by impugned order is Just and proper There is no error warranting interference of this Court d hereinabove the writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. No order asto costs. Judge For the reasons mentione g Sd/— g Satish K. Agnihotri j