WP(C) 6505/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. A. Roshid, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. A. Deka, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department appearing for the r espondent Nos.1 to 3 and Mr. G. Goswami, learned Standing Counsel, SSA appearing for the respondent Nos.4 to 6. The petitioner’s grievance in the present petition is th at though Paschim Bharalipara Venture LP School represented by its President, Md . Sadik Ali is the original school, the benefit of the financial assistance are sought to be given to Na-Satra Char Para Venture LP School ignoring the claim of the petitioner. According to the petitioner, for that purpose it has approached the authority concerned, however, without any result. The dispute, as raised in the present petition, as notic ed above, cannot be decided in a writ proceeding. It is the authority to decide the matter. The petitioner also claims the financial assistance from the Gover nment under the Scheme formulated for that purpose. That being the position, the present writ petition is di sposed of with the observation that if the petitioner’s school is found to be el igible in terms of the Scheme formulated by the Government, for grant of financi al assistance and subject to recommendation of its case by the appropriate autho rity, the case of the petitioner alongwith other similar schools shall be consid ered for grant of financial assistance. While doing so, the respondent authorit ies shall also bear in mind the decision of this Court in Knaklata Girls’ ME Sch ool & Ors. -Vs- State of Assam Ors. reported in 2007 (3) GLT 333. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No cost.