IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 5614 of 1999 Between: Rajesh Agarwal S/o.Madanlal Agarwal Badruka College of Commerce and Arts, Kachiguda, Hyderabad, R/o.H.No.14-1-502, Paan Mandi Hyderabad-500 012 ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Secretary Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner of Collegiate Education Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad 3 The Regional Joint Director of Higher Education Hyderabad 4 The Corresponsdent, Badruka College of Commerce and Arts, Kachiguda, Hyderabad-500 027 .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction essentially in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the petitioner herein is eligible and entitled for regularisation of services in the post of lecturer in Hindi (grant in aid post) in Badruka College of Commerce and Arts, Kachiguda, Hyderabad without reference to the cut off date imposed in GO.Ms.No.328, dt.15/10/1997 by holding the action of the respondents herein in not considering the case of the petitioner herein for regularisation by extending the benefit of law laid down by Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in OA.No.6199/1996 Dt.3/7/1998 and Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.28572/1995 dt.31/7/1996 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and opposed to law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court besides being violative of Articles 14, 16 & 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents herein to regularise the services of the petitioner as Lecturer in Hindi in Badruka College of Commerce and Arts, Kachiguda, Hyderabad i.e., Respondent No.4 herein with all consequential benefits and attendant benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.J.SUDHEER Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.M.V.S.SURESH KUMAR The Court made the following : ORDER: (Per Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) When the matter has been taken up for hearing on 4.6.2009, neither the petitioner nor his counsel were present and there was no representation on their behalf. Therefore, the matter was directed to be posted on 8.6.2009 under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Even today also, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’ neither the petitioner nor his counsel are present and there is no representation on their behalf. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No order as to costs. Communicate copy of the order to the petitioner by registered post. __________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. _________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J. 8.6.2009 kpr