Review Application No. 23 of 2006 in [1] Letters Patent Appeal No. 747 of 1985 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Review Application No. 23 of 2006 in Letters Patent Appeal No. 747 of 1985 Date of Decision: February 05, 2009 Khushi Ram (dead) though his Legal Representatives and others .......... Applicant-appellants versus State of Haryana and another ......... .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.THAKUR,CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present : Mr. Ashu Bhatia, Advocate and Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, Advocate for the applicant-appellants Mr. Randhir Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana ***** T.S.Thakur, C.J. (Oral) Heard. Apart from the fact that there is an inordinate delay of about 18 years in the filing of this review application for which no cogent reason is forthcoming from the applicants, we see no error apparent on the face of the record to warrant interference with the order under review. Learned counsel for the applicants fairly concedes that the only ground Review Application No. 23 of 2006 in [2] Letters Patent Appeal No. 747 of 1985 urged in the review application for the consideration of this Court is that this Court has in connection with a subsequent notification in relation to a different parcel of land fixed a slightly higher amount of compensation. We are afraid any such determination in relation to a different notification issued subsequent to the notification on the basis of which the applicants' land was acquired cannot constitute an error apparent on the face of the record so as to warrant interference with the order passed by this Court. The review application is accordingly dismissed leaving the parties to bear their own costs. ( T.S. THAKUR ) CHIEF JUSTICE 05.02.2009 ( HEMANT GUPTA ) khushbir JUDGE