THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P.Nos.23894 and 23896 of 1998 DATED: 20-06-2007 W.P.No.23894 of 1998: Between: Hanumanthu and another .. Petitioners and The Superintending Engineer, Operation, A.P.S.E.B., Nizamabad and others. .. Respondents W.P.No.23896 of 1998: Between: G. Mallaiah and others .. Petitioners and The Superintending Engineer, Operation, A.P.S.E.B., Nizamabad and others. .. Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P.Nos.23894 and 23896 of 1998 Common Order: In these two writ petitions, since common questions of fact of law arise, they are being disposed of by this common order. The grievance of the petitioners in both these writ petitions, who were all working as Casual Labourers in the A.P. State Electricity Board, is that though they are entitled for appointment as Junior Linemen in pursuance of the interviews held on 15.9.1997 with all consequential benefits, their case was not considered by the respondent Authorities. There is no necessity of going into all the details. It appears, in a similar matter, the management went upto Supreme Court by way of Review Petition (C) No.1321 of 1998 in S.L.P.(C) No.13766 of 1997 and the same was dismissed on 15.03.1999 with certain observations. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners are also entitled for the benefit of the said order. In view of the above, without going into the merits of the case, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioners as per the order of the Apex Court, dated 15.03.1999, in Review Petition (C) No.1321 of 1998 in S.L.P.(C) No.13766 of 1997, and pass appropriate orders as per law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioners. With the above direction, both the writ petitions are disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ____​__________ C.V. RAMULU, J 20th June, 2007. IBL