,gssaa";t»,_ €^\. HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BltASPUR WrJtJPetitienN&23%of2006^ PeBHoner Assem l^nnar Mukharjee Aged - 59 yeais, Son of Late D.K. Mukhaijee Posted as - Upper Division Teacher, At - S.S. Kalibadi Hr. Sec. School, Kalibadi, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) R/o H. No. 2/126, Bayron Bazar, Near Ram Mandir Raipur (C.G.) Vereus Resoondents 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secreiary, School Educafion Department, Marrtrala^i, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur The Director, Publte InrtrucUons, ChhirtUsgarh Head Quarter at - Raipur. The Governlr^ Body of K^litedi Shiksha Samiti, Through-its Sclwol Secretary, S.S. Kali Badi Hr. Sec. School, t^libadi, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETmON U/A - 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTn-UTION QF INDIA SB: Hon'bte Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Mr. R.K. Kesharwani, Advocate for the petib'oner. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panel lawyerforthe respondents No. 1 and 2/State. ORDER (Passed on this 16'" day ofA|»il,2807) The quesfion of law involved herein is whettier e non-teachlng ^aff working in Govemment aided school are ertftted to the benefit of recommendations of the Fifth Pay Commission under Ihe provislons ofthe Madhya Pradesh AshasWya Sikshan San^ha (Adhyapaton Tatha Anya Karmchariyon Ke Vetano Ka Sandaya) Adhiniyam, 1878 (henceforth 'ttie Adhiniyam, 1978') and the rules made thereunder read with ttie Madhya Pradesh Revisfon of Pay Rules, 1988 (henceforth "the Pay Rules, 1988'). Leamed counsel appearing fbr the petifioner submits that the temis and conditions of the teaching and non-teaching staff are governed by the same provisions of law which were under conskteraBon by ttlis Court in the matter of Smt. A. Lall vs. State of ChhaBisgarh and oftier connected mattere (W.P. No. 4108 of 2005), wherein by the Judgmerrt and oreler datsd 6.2.2007, this Court hekl that the petitionerswho are working In fully Govemment aided private schools are entiBed to ths revisad pay-scales with effect from 1.1.1996 as prescribed under the Pay Rute, 1988. This Court further for ttie purpos®of paymert <rf arrears had granted certain direction. Admittedly and jointly, it is submitted by the parties at this matta' is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 6^.2007 (assed t^ this Court in Uie case <rf Smt. A. Lall vs. State af Chhatti^arh and offier connected matters (Supra). As a result, fw the r^isons stated in the judgment and order dated 6^.2007 passed in W.P. No. 4108 of 20)5 (Smt. A. Lall vs. State of Chhatfisgarh and other conneeted mattere) (Supra), the vwll pefition fe allowed in the same tenns and conditions. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge WT