IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 14th day of May, 2010 2nd Bail Application No. 47 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Trilok Chandra .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 04/2010, U/s 381, 420 IPC, PS Rishikesh, District Dehradun. May 14, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. First bail application of the accused applicant was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 11.3.2010 passed by this Court. Hence, this second bail application has been moved on his behalf. Heard Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant argued that the money shown to be recovered from the possession of the accused applicant actually belongs to him and the said money was withdrawn by him from his own account from the bank and he is also claiming that money. He also submitted that applicant has got no previous criminal history, who is in jail since 9.1.2010. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR, recovery memo and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Trilok Chandra be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of CJM, Dehradun. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 14.5.2010 PRABODH