IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6323 of 2009 RAM SAGAR PATHAK SON OF LATE SRIKANT PATHAK, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MATHAR, P.S. NAYAGAON, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BEGUSARAI. 2. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, BEGUSARAI. 3. COMMISSIONER, WATER RESOURCES, MINOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. SECRETARY MINOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 5. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BACHHBARA, BEGUSARAI. 6. DIRECTOR PUBLIC INFORMATION CUM ACCOUNT ADMINISTRATION, SELF EMPLOYMENT DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, BEGUSARAI. ----------- 3/ 12.05.2010 Paragraph-18 of the counter-affidavit statement has been made vide letter No.3576 dated 16.12.2008 that Collector Begusarai has raised a demand for allotment of Rs. 590272/- for making payment of admitted dues of the petitioner. Annexure-A of the counter-affidavit is in support of such statement. This Court fails to understand as to why the respondents have failed even after two years now to obtain the fund and release payment in favour of the petitioner. There is also evidence on record to show that wherever an order has been passed by the High Court, payments have come to be made. If a certification or a direction of the High Court is required, let it be recorded that the District Magistrate, Begusarai has an obligation to ensure that the requisition of amount whether received or - 2 - not received is paid to the petitioners in the next three months, if the payment has not been made in the meanwhile. The writ application is disposed of. ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J ) BTiwary/