IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.912 OF 2009 Central Bank of India ... Petitioner Vs. M/s. Bharatiya Traders and others .... Respondents Ms. R. Maravarman for the Petitioner. Mr. Umesh Shetty with Ms. Yamini Chandran for the respondent Nos.1 to 7 and 9. Mr. V.K. Aggarwal for the respondent No.8. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 8TH JUNE, 2009 P.C.: We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The impugned order has been passed by the Appellate Authority on the facts and circumstances of this case and does not state any proposition of law. It is an interlocutory order. The petitioner is at liberty to raise all grounds, if finally aggrieved, by the order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal. 2. We do not find any case made out for Interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.