IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-21728 of 2010 Date of Decision: 14.01.2011 Parvesh Kumar and another .... Petitioner Versus Vikas Pandhi and another ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Sanjay Verma, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG Haryana for respondent No. 2 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that in compliance of order dated 4.8.2010, petitioner-accused has appeared before the trial Court and has already been enlarged on bail. He has further stated that petitioner is regularly appearing before the trial Court. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG Haryana does not dispute this fact. In view of this, present petition is allowed. Order dated 04.8.2010 is made absolute. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (ALOK SINGH) 14.01.2011 JUDGE reena