g3 .. BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR / 77 / ‘ WP— '1 87$ /2005(SB) Service Matter PETITIONER ~ /M.P. Rathore aged about 50 years S/o Of arayan R/o Laxmipur, P0. & Distt : / Lf$ “hm aigarh (CG) Revenue Inspector, - Raigarh (urban) VERSUS / 1. State of Chhattlsgarh through Collector Raugarh Po & Dlstt Raugarh Chhattlsgarh /2. Shri S.K. Dewangon, Deputy Collector Inquiry Officer, Raigarh, (CG) Petition under article 22g/227 / / of the Constitution of India — For issuance of a writ of mandamus and certiorari and an other writ/direction/order. Xl—HC~78 M€§ ’ "" ’ W’ r w aqzoo ma imW ammésrmwia: mmqfa; ...'Vu.‘.'...‘... .62}?x§:\‘3 eaWW) ’ mmwma ii-S-QQQS Shri BR. Ghosh, counel e1 for the petitioner‘ Shri Bhaskar P‘yasi, F Nul. Hcard baith the counsci The peutioner, whc is Departmsnt, Raigjarh, has 1:1 prayed for quas‘immm of the ‘ 13004 and thg iiiollsctor; Pmc . C‘fficer and de nave En Learned ooungel for the hag bean served upon :he petitianer was iiistrumen R"jccv Gandhi Aashraya Veg; preparing wrong report ae. respondent No2 S, K Officer. The pétitimwr could 005 du€ m th6 mam": purpasei the p€titi0n€y>appli€ was n0: allawed and by raj: enquiry officer has proceede enquiry officer shouid be. gubmittcd that 6mm ihe $111 petitioner for the reason that Rajesh Kumar Rathore has fiJ Court and stay has been grat mwqmwa’m'wm $Wanéer 'V")an: up. v~ . ‘anei Lawyer for the Stateg’x‘espondem me Revenue Inspectorin me Revemie referred this writ petitioo anéi he hae charge eheet Aimexure—P/ 1 dated 2245— ;aljh be chz‘ected 1:0 chaoge the Enquiry direcied to be initiated h ‘ petitioner submitted that the charge {he pemtxonez‘ W1th :he. allegauons that ta} in allotment of residentim plot udder there o r 1 (t, £ coocealing certain informaticm and Egan, 'Deputy Lbilector, i3 the. Enquiry not appear before the enquiry officer on age of eon and oaughter and for that :rfor adjournment in advance, but that eating the prayer of the Q 1a in favour of Rajeeh KLm’za? petitioner, the :1 ex—parte and he re biased; therefore, Changed. Learned oounee‘r fu rther quit? cannot be proceeded against the regarding ailon‘nem of the Said pioi; S’hri ed Writ petition No.51’7f2005 before. this: red in favour of the petitioner, therefore, W[’ g g“ .3 Xl-HCv78 mm-$ III-l-.-III-.l-II-ulullluunultlnlnun 111200 W21W (llama) the the the m