1 Cri.Appln.No.5290/2010 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5290/2010 (Amol s/o Bharat Jadhav Vs. The State of Mah.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.SS Tope, Adv. for applicant; Mr.NB Patil, APP for State. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 11 th January, 2011. ... 1) Heard. 2) Notice, learned APP waives service. he is equipped with the record. Specific role is pointed to the applicant/accused for the alleged incident dated 6.5.2010, wherein the complainant was robbed snatched under the knife point and threatened by a group of five persons. These persons have been intercepted by Police and nabbed them. There was recovery of the currency notes belonging to the complainant, including lethal weapons used for commission of the offence. The weapons created a terror in the mind of victim. 3) The theory, that has been projected by the applicant/accused is, that it was an altercation between the 2 Cri.Appln.No.5290/2010 accused/applicant and the person driving Indica car and a different colour is given to the situation. Even if this is accepted, it is more than clear, there is recovery of currency notes from the accused/applicant and also recovery of knife. There is no explanation, as to under what circumstances, the knife was carried. That apart, the accused persons were running in haste in the vehicle, they were intercepted by police and the complainant. 4) No case to entertain bail application is made out, application rejected. 5) Considering the nature of allegations, hearing expedited. 6) The observations are prima facie in nature. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/