^J..- \^ 'S:.3^ ^^' •^'^^^^ ^-^';\\ ^•^i""' ....-\-A\^/S e'yi'. _..--•\' C-^- \^6·'^/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT: BILASPUR W.P.fS)No. !'^^30F2011 PETITIONER: /Ramakant Kaushik, aged 56 years, son of Shri Shyamlal Kaushik, Forester, resident ofvillage Hafa now at village and post Sakri, tahsil Takhatpur, district Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). VERSUS RESPONDENTS: /'\. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, department of Forest, Raipur (C.G.). ^-2. The Conservator ofForest, Bilaspur Circle, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF BSIDIA. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.1725 OF 2011 PETITIONER Ramakant Kaushik RESPONDENTS Versus The State of Chhattisgarh & Another (Writ Petition underArticles 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Somnath Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 19"'dayofApril, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merits at this stage. However, learned counsel submits that the respondent authorities may be directed to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner on 25-1-2011 (Annexure - P/10) as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law. 2. Learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State submits that the pending representation dated 25-1-2011 (Annexure - P/10) shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits, within a period of four weeks. 3. In view of foregoing, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge