Civil Revision No. 2604 of 2009 (1) In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 2604 of 2009 (O&M) Pradeep Prasad ... Petitioner vs Smt. Shiela Emile ... Respondent Coram : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Ms. Ashima Mor, Advocate for the petitioner. Rajesh Bindal, J. Challenge in the present petitions is to order dated 2.3.2009, passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), UT Chandigarh, whereby application filed by the petitioner for appointment of Local Commissioner was rejected, after considering the contention raised by both the parties. Learned trial Court while rejecting the application observed that no Local Commissioner can be appointed to collect evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that appointment of Local Commissioner was required for just and proper decision of the issue in dispute as he would have reported the status at the site, which the other party was disputing. She further submitted that appointment of Local Commissioner would be material for the purpose of decision of the controversy as he would have given a detailed report of the factual position at the site, which would have made clear as to whether the stand taken by the petitioner or the respondent was correct. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any merit in the contention raised. A Division Bench of this Court in Pritam Singh and another vs Sunder Lal and others 1990 (2) Punjab Law Reporter 191 had categorically held that order refusing to appoint a Local Commissioner does not decide any issue nor adjudicate rights of the parties for the purpose of the suit and no revision against that was held to be maintainable. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to cite any judgment taking a view contrary to what has been taken by the Division Bench of this Court. A Single Bench of this court in Hari Om vs Manish Kumar, 2005(2) HRR 246 also dismissed revision petition filed by the Civil Revision No. 2604 of 2009 (2) petitioner therein challenging the order refusing to appoint Local Commissioner. The same view was followed in Civil Revision No. 4294 of 2007 Ramesh Kumar Pashan vs Sumita Bedi and another decided on 28.8.2007. Accordingly, I do not find any merit in the present petition and the same is dismissed. 7.5.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge