1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.866 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.148 OF 2003 Sakhubai Satish Gaikwad APPLICANT VERSUS Satish S/o.Vitthal Gaikwad RESPONDENT Mr.Ranjana Reddy, learned counsel for applicant. Mr.S.B.Talekar, learned counsel for respondent. (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 05/03/2010 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant. Issue notice to respondent. Shri.Talekar accepts notice for respondent. 2. The writ petition is filed challenging the order in Criminal Revision Application No.124/2001 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad against the application filed by the present applicant who is respondent in the writ petition for maintenance against respondent husband. It appears that at the time of grant of stay, an order was passed directing the respondent petitioner to deposit Rs.14,000/- till 29/06/2003 in lieu of some percentage of the 2 arrears of maintenance due from the respondent in this application to the respondent applicant in the main petition. As the writ petition is pending since year 2003, the applicant has prayed to fix the early date of hearing of the writ petition and allow her to withdraw the amount deposited by the respondent in the application, who is petitioner in the writ petition. 3. Considering the submissions across the bar, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause A & B and stands disposed of. Writ petition to be fixed for final hearing in the first week of April. Application stands disposed of accordingly. Applicant in this application is at liberty to take the steps against petitioner for violation of orders passed by this Court to deposit 50% of the monthly maintenance in the Trial Court. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/MAR 2010/cri.appl.866-10