IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13539 of 2010 RAM RATAN RAI son of late Shiv Shankar Rai--------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 5. 7.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 160 quintals of rice was sent from Siliguri to Bishun Agrawal but was supplied to co-accused Om Prakash. Petitioner is owner of the truck denying his hand in supply of rice to someone else and according to the learned counsel , he gave his truck to transport company. No doubt driver and khalasi were his employees but it has not come that they supplied the rice to Om Prakash under direction of the petitioner. After giving the truck to transport company, he always remained unconcerned with the same. So fixing liability for the same petitioner’s rejection for anticipatory bail cannot be justified. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Munger, in connection with Kharagpur P.S. case no.173 of 2006 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J.)