IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 186 of 2008 (S/B) Suresh Chand Sharma .……… Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ………. Respondents Mr. Pankaj Purohit, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Brief Holder for respondent No.1. Mr. Sudhir Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate for respondent No.4. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. The Tribunal has rightly dismissed the claim petition by observing that the petitioner must avail of the alternative remedy of filing a statutory appeal. There is no warrant for interference. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 08.08.2008 08.08.2008 LSR/Shiv 2