IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17673 of 2009 RAM ASHISH PANJIYAR, SON OF LATE ROOPLAL PANJIYAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHIRHAR, P.S. KHIRHAR, DISTRICT MADHUBANI. ---- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SHAMBHU KHETAN, SON OF LATE SATYA NARAIN KHETAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHIRHAR, P.S. KHIRHAR, DISTRICT MADHUBANI. ---- OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 2 6.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 19.3.2009, passed by the Fast Track Court No. IV, Madhubani in Cr. Revision No. 31 of 2008 affirming the order dated 6.7.2006, passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhubani. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present case arises out of a case filed on behalf of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the case has been filed after a delay of three days and it is sort of a defence taken by the informant/complainant of the case. All these aspects may be considered at the time of the trial of this case. In both the cases triable by the Magistrate or triable b y the Sessions Judge, the petitioner would have the liberty to file an application that the matter should be heard together. This application is disposed of. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)