C.R.R. No.105 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.M. No.2590 of 2011 in/and C.R.R. No.105 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15.03.2011 Lakhwinder Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI -.- Present: Mr. Hemender Goswami, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gazi Mohammad, D.A.G., Punjab. *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) C.R.M. No.2590 of 2011 For the reasons recorded, application is allowed. Delay of 72 days in filing the revision is condoned. C.R.R. No.105 of 2011 (O&M) -2- C.R.R. No.105 of 2011 (O&M) This petition has been filed against the judgments and orders of the Courts below whereby bail application of the petitioner has been dismissed in case F.I.R. No.160 dated 30.11.2006 registered under Sections 307, 323, 324, 341, 34 IPC at P.S. Haibowal, Ludhiana. On 17.1.2011 the following order was passed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has now been in custody since May, 2009 for having jumped bail but at that time he was in custody in another case. Notice of motion. Mr. Gazi Mohammad, DAG, Punjab, at the asking of the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to supply two copies of the petition to the learned DAG during the course of the day. Adjourned to 04.03.2011.” Learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab has not disputed the factual averments made. He has further stated that the petitioner is also facing two other FIRs. Be that as it may, the petitioner has now been in custody C.R.R. No.105 of 2011 (O&M) -3- since May, 2009. In the circumstances, I deem it appropriate to release the petitioner on bail in case F.I.R. No.160 dated 30.11.2006 to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. Ordered accordingly. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) March 15, 2011 JUDGE ashish