(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5791 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5791 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5791 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 222 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 222 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 222 OF 2004 Manmit Sarup Sauggu @ Rocky ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondents ..... Mr. Peter Lobo, Advocate for Applicant Mr. D.P. Adsule, A.P.P. for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 19TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 DATED: 19TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 DATED: 19TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard both sides. 2. By order dated 24.6.2005, temporary bail granted to the applicant was extended by this Court on the ground of illness of his father as the father of the applicant required surgery which was fixed in the last week of July, 2005. Now it is submitted that the father of the applicant may be operated in the last week of September or in the second or third week of October, 2005, hence, the period of temporary bail may be extended. 3. It is seen that the applicant is on temporary (-2-) bail for a long time. By order dated 24.6.2005 the period of temporary bail was extended on the ground of illness of the father of applicant. In the order dated 24.6.2005, it is clearly stated that the period was extended as a last chance upto 31.8.2005. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to extend the period of temporary bail of the applicant. Application is rejected. 4. At this stage, Mr. Lobo prays that the applicant may be granted time to surrender upto 25.9.2005. Learned A.P.P. has no objection to the said prayer being granted. Hence, applicant is granted time upto 25.09.2005 to surrender. 5. Application is disposed of. *****