1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2019 OF 2008 (Mohd. Shadab Mohd. Haroon Mitthani vs. State and others) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : JUNE 6, 2008 Shri Parchure, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that the issue involved in the present petition is identical to one involved in Writ Petition No.2017/2008, which is disposed of by this Court vide order dated 3.6.2008 and, therefore, present petition may be disposed of in terms of the said order. Shri Thakre, learned Assistant Government Pleader does not dispute the factual and legal aspects of the matter. In the circumstances, present petition is disposed of in terms of order dated 3.6.2008 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.2017/2008, which reads thus : “Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already submitted representation 2 dated 2.4.2008 to the Chief Officer, Nagar Parishad, Daryapur for redressal of his grievance. The petitioner vide communication dated 16.4.2008 issued by the Chief Officer has been informed that the decision in respect of grievance of the petitioner is under consideration of the Authorities concerned in view of the policy of reservation, etc. Counsel for the petitioner states that since the School in question is Urdu medium School, policy of reservation is not applicable. Be that as it may, in the backdrop of the above referred facts and without expressing any view on the merits of the matter, we expect the competent Authority to take a final decision within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. The Registrar (Judicial) is directed to communicate our order to the Chief Officer, Nagar Parishad, Daryapur forthwith.” JUDGE JUDGE khj