IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 24071 of 2002 Between: 1 Kum.Biradavolu Krishnaveni, D/o Sri B.C.Subramanyam, Minor, Rep by her natural Mother & Guardian, Dr. Smt.B.Venkata Ramanamma, R/o. Flat No. 108, Krishna Kalyan Residency, 37-115, Sri Colony, Rama Krishna Puram, Secunderabad. 2 Dr.Smt.Biradavolu Venkata Rammanamma, W/o Sri B.C.Subramanyam. R/o. Flat No.108, Krishna Kalyan Residency, 37-115 Sri Colony, Rama Krishna Puram, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Collector, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bhongir, Nalgonda. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue awrit or order or any other direction in the nature of writ, more paticularly a Writ of Manadamus to the respondents declaring the action of the responednts in not determining the amount of compensation payable to petitioners in respect of the lands admn.2 Ac.30 guntas, for purpose of laying " Bhimalingam Canal ", as sought in notice dt. 10-10-2001, as illeagl, arbitrary, high-handed and is violative of Articles 14 and 300(A) of the Constitution of India, and consequently issue a writ or Direction, to the respondents, to determine the amount of compensation payable to us, accordence with law, as otherwise we suffer irreperable loss ans injury. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.KURITIBHASKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 24071 of 2002 17-02-2009 Oral Order: It is represented by Sri Kuriti Bhaskara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in thw rit petition does not survive for adjudication, as the respondents have deposited the amount before the Civil Court. In view of the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 17-02-2009 Pvks