1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29112 of 2011 Md. Guddu @ Taj Faishal S/o Md. Alamgir, R/o Village- Bokhara, P.S. Nanpur, District-Sitamarhi. --Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar --Opp.Party 2 22.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is solitary named accused in this case being son of Mukhiya carries allegation of realizing Rs.3,000/- from allegationist to provide benefit of Indira Aawas Scheme. Subsequently, demanded Rs.2,000/- which she was unable to pay but demanded refund of earlier paid Rs.3,000/- which was denied. Submission is that learned Sessions Judge, though rejected the prayer, arrived at the conclusion that there is no tangible evidence to know about the demand of the amount. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender 2 within four weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri, District- Sitamarhi, in Nanpur P.S. Case no. 37 of 2011, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be canceled. AAhmad ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)