'SS^i^S^^^^S^s^Li-^. ^ ^^SSSffSWSSSWSSiWW •BBKffSil^^£st^" y^6":..^- ^^A^i-i- &»'^-•" m INTHEMlGHCOURTOFCHHAmSGARHAT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) N0.s& 21 /20Q6 PETITIONER ^ RESPONDENTS Smt. Sandhya Sharma W/o Shri Alok Kumar Sharma Age about 38 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Girls Hr. Sec. School, Rajim, Block - Phingeshwar, Distt.- Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS 1. StateGovt.ofChhattisgarh . Through: Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Petitioner most humbly submit as under:- HI6H COURT OF CHHATTCSSARH AT BILASPUR Petitioner ftespondents Petitioner Req?ondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents W. P.fSyNo. 5623 of 2006 Smt. Ishwari Pandey Versus State Sovt. of Chhattisgarh & onother W. P. ISlNo. 5624 of 2006 Ku. Sushilai Vermoi Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & cmo-rtier W. P. (5) No. 5625 of 2006 Ku. 5h<»henaParveen Versus State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & another W. P. f5) No. 5626 of 2006 Rajendra Prasad Soni Versus State Sovt. of Chhattisgarh & another W.P.(S)No.S627of2006 Tok Singh Verma Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh iS another W. P. (5) No. %28 of 2006 Ramgopal Chaturvedi Versus State ©ovt.of Chhattisgarh A another W. P. (S) No. 3629 of 2006 Smt. Simdhya Sharma Versus State ©ovt.of Chhattisgarh <S ano-fher W. P. (5) No. S630 of 20)6 Rakesh Kumar Sahu Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & ano+her W. P. (5) No. 5631 of 2006 Versus Lakhan Lal Patel 5+a+e 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & ano-rfier Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents W. P. (SVNo. 5632 of 2036 Ku. Jeera Padhyay Versus State <5ovt. of Chhattis9arh & another And W. P. f5) No. 5633 of 2006 Sagar Ram Dahariya Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & cmo+her Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Shri AJay Shrivastava, Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, 6ovt. Advocate for respondents/State. ORDER >th (13ffl October, 2006) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that while working as Assistont Teachers. the petitroners have gone on training to improve their quatificatioru? qn their own expenses and acquired B. Ed./B.TJ. Examination Certificate. 2. The present writ petitions, being W.P.(5) Nos. 5623/2006, 5624/2006,5625/2006.5626/2006,5627/2006,5628/2006, 5629/2006, 5630/2006, 5631/2006, 5632/2006 and 5633/2006 involve similar facts ond common question of law. Thus, ^hese petitions are being disposed of by this common order. 3. According to learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners are entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar < Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another {2006 CEI) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court in the case of Ycishwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, t)urg and another (Supra), came t6 the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B.Ed./B.TJ: Examination Certificate on his own expenses, are covered by the circular dated 24.12.98 issued by the State Sovemment of Madhya Pradesh. 4. Leamed counsel for the petitioners -farther submits that the facts and question of law involved in the present cases are squarely covered by decision of this Court' in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, t>urg and another (Supra), to vriiich learned counsel appearin9 for •rtie respondents fairly concedes and agrees with the averment made by leamed counsel appearing for -Hie petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the writ petitions are atlowed in terms of the order possed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and cnotiier (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.TJ. Examination Certificate on their own expenses or not. No order as to costs. 6. A copy of fhis order be placed on record of other connected writ petitions. Subhash Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge ;