IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 14TH AUGUST 2009 / 23RD SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 23237 of 2009(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- RASEENA K.V. UPSA, MUMVHSS VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE DIST. BY ADV. SRI.POOVAMULLE PARAMBIL ABDULKAREEM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE DIST. 3. MANAGER, MUMVHSS VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.23237/2009-y ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 14th day of August, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is working as U.P.S.A under the third respondent Manager. She was appointed a per Ext.P1 order in a leave vacancy of Smt.Jameela.M.. The second respondent declined approval of appointment as per Ext.P2 order. The Manager challenged the same before the first respondent. Ext.P3 is the resultant order passed by the first respondent whereby, the revision petition was allowed and the matter was remitted back to the District Educational Officer for fresh disposal. It was also directed that it shall be ensured that there is no Rule 51A claimant waiting for approval. It is pointed out that no further orders have been passed by the said officer so far. The petitioner therefore prays that there may be a direction to the District Educational Officer to take a decision within a time frame. 2. In the light of the fact that by Ext.P3, a direction has already been issued by the Director of Public Instructions to the District Educational Officer to pass fresh orders, the second respondent is hereby directed to take a decision with regard to the approval of appointment of the petitioner W.P.(C). No.23237/2009 -:2:- within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment after hearing the petitioner and the Manager. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms