IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.216 of 2005 1. ANWARUL HAQUE @ SK. ANWARUL S/O SK. AALIM 2. EKRAMUL HAQUE SON OF SK. AALIM ---- PETITIONERS Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2A. MD. AMANULLAH S/O LATE MATLOOB AHMAD 2B. MD. IRFAULLAH S/O LATE MATOOB AHMAD 2C. RUKHSANA KHATOON D/O LATE MATOOB AHMAD 2D.GURIA KHATOON D/O LATE MATOOB AHMAD For the petitioners : Mr. Washi Ahmad Khan, Advocate. For the O.Ps : Mr. Aminuddin Ahmad Khan, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ----------- 11 10.11.2010 Petitioners are the second party to the proceeding initiated under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (herein after referred to as the ‘Code’). They are aggrieved by order dated 17.01.2005 passed in case no. 141 of 2001 (Matloob Ahmad vs. Anwarul Haque ) whereby on a consideration of the oral as well as documentary evidence brought on record learned Magistrate has found as under:- Þnksuks i{k }kjk nkf[ky fyf[kr fooj.kh] ekSf[kd lkf{k;ksa dk lk{; rFkk nkf[ky dkxtkrksa ds voyksdu rFkk rqyukRed ijh{k.k fd;k ftlls Li"V gksrk gs fd fooknh tehu ij orZeku na0iz0la0 dh /kkjk 145 dh dk;Zokgh izkjEHk gksus ds nks ekg iwoZ ls izFke i{k dk 'kkfUr iw.kZ n[ky dCtk pyk vk jgk rFkk fooknh tehu ij f}rh; i{k viuk n[ky dCtk izekf.kr djus esa vleFkZ jgk gSA vr% fooknh tehu ij izFke i{k dk n[ky dCtk ?kksf"kr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk f}rh; i{k dks vkns’k fn;k tkrk gS fd fooknh tehu ij izFke i{k ds 'kkfUr iwoZd n[ky dCtk esa Hkkstkfgdr ds’k u djsa tc rd fd blds foijhr dksbZ ;Fkk vkns’k fdlh l{ke U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr u dj fn;k tk;AÞ Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that 2 this order was passed by the learned Executive Magistrate on remand order dated 07.04.2004 passed by learned revisional Court. It is contended that learned Sub Divisional Magistrate has evaluated the evidence on record and has come to the said conclusion which does not suffer from any patent illegality meriting interference. I have perused the impugned order. It appears that both the parties led evidence oral as well as documentary which was/were appraised and evaluated by learned Magistrate. This Court does not find any patent illegality in the order meriting interference. The application is dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)