IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.975 of 2010 Date of decision: 10.12.2010 Subhash Chand ....Appellant Versus Dalip Kumar ....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL Present : Mr. Padam Jain, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. Parties also in person. **** L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) By this common order I am dispossing of three appeals bearing RSA No.975 of 2010, RSA No.976 of 2010 and RSA No.977 of 2010 all titled Subhash Chand Versus Dalip Kumar. Pursuant to suggestions made by this Court, parties have affected amicable settlement in all the three appeals. Joint statement of parties regarding amicable settlement in all the three cases has been recorded separately and is reproduced hereunder: “Statement of Subhash Chand, Appellant and Dalip Kumar, Respondent on SA in RSA No.975 of 2010, RSA No.976 of 2010 and RSA No.977 of 2010. * * * * Pursuant to suggestions made by the Court, we have arrived at amicable settlement in all the three appeals bearing RSA No.975 of 2010, RSA No.976 of 2010 and RSA No.977 of 2010. As per compromise, appellant shall pay total amount of Rs.1,90,000/- to the respondent on or before 30.04.2011 and on said payment, claim of respondent plaintiff in all the three cases shall stand satisfied in toto. However, if the appellant fails to pay the aforesaid amount within the stipulated period, all the three appeals shall be deemed to have been dismissed. Out of the aforesaid amount of Rs.1,90,000/-, appellant has today paid Rs.20,000/- in cash to the respondent in Court. And the balance amount of Rs.1,70,000/- shall be payable on or before 30.04.2011. In view of amicable settlement between the parties, Court fee paid on the second appeal be refunded to the appellant in all the three cases. All the three appeals be disposed of accordingly.” The appeals have thus been lawfully compromised. In view of compromise, all the three appeals are disposed of in terms of the above statement which shall form part of the decree sheets. In view of amicable settlement between the parties pursuant to terms of settlement suggested by this Court, court fee paid on the second appeals is ordered to be refunded to the appellant in all the three cases. (L. N. Mittal) Judge 10.12.2010 'raj'