.4'sfSf^. /l'.!f:':":^i. ^ / &..._'i' "%t ^. '^ s s '!^, ^s^'jy i^•;)( IN THE HIGH COUKr OP CHHATriSGAKH : BILASPUK Wnt Petition No. 2851 ot'MX)^ Ftetitioner Jagar Sai, son of Bocthaii Gour, aged about Defendaat 55 years, resident of vfllage Kaiaalpur (Old No.l Kataiu) TalisU Suraipur, Police Station - Surajpur, District Surguja (C. G.) Versus Respondents 1. Sadhiiraui, son of Choono Goiir, aged about 66 years. 2. Sufal son of Golal Gour, aged about 66 years. 3. Naaha, son of Gokal Gour, aged about 55 years. (AU are resideut of viliage Kaiaalpur • (Katani) Tahsil Surajpur, Police Station Sitrajpur, District Suiyija (C. G.) Indraso daughter of Bodliau Gour, aged about 40 years, R/o Kamalpur, Tah. & P.S. Surajpur, Distt. S~urguja. Somaru, son of Jagar Sai, a'ged about 25 years, resident oivlilage Akshaypur, PoUce Station Ramanujnagar, District Suiguja (C.G.) Heera, son of Jagamath, e^ed about 35 years, resident ofvillage - Katnalpur, Tahsil aud Police Station Suiajpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.5 7. State of Chliattisgarh, Through - The CoUector, SiuyyaAinbikapur(C.G.) (Writ Ftetition uuder Article 227 ofthe Coustitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Sbri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) 4. 5. 6. Shri V. K. Paadey, Advocate tbr Cbe peUtioner. Stui Gautam Khetrapal, Advocatc for the respondents No. 1 to 3. Shri P. K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the respondent No.7. 1. OR D E R ( Passed on fhis 9th Day ofJanuary, 2009) Leamed counsel appeariug tbr the petitioner, on uistructions, submits ttaat tbe petitioner seeks pennission ot this Coiirt to witlKlraw this petition, as in view of fhe decision in Ameer Trading Corpxi. Ltd. Vs. Shapoorji Data Processiag Ltd. (2004) 1 SCC 702 this petition has become iufructuous. f^. '°2-9 2. Leamed counsel appearuig for the respondents No. 1 to 3 aud 7 have uo objectiou. 3. ln view of fhe foregoiug, this petition te dismissed as withdranni, as having beconie infructuous. Interun otder passed ou 21.3.2003 stands dischai^ed. Consequently, M(W)P No. 1851/2002 is also disimssed. Tfaalmr