In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 7801 of 2010 Date of Decision: 1.12.2010 Laxman Dass …Petitioner Versus Rameshwar Dass …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Kansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the proposed amendment in the written statement by the tenant/respondent was nothing but a tactic to delay culmination of the proceedings, arising out of the eviction petition. He further submits that the eviction petition was filed in the year 2006. He further submits that he will not dispute, at this stage, the proposed amendment in the written statement, in case the Rent Controller, Narwana, is directed to decide the eviction petition within the specified time. I find merit in the alternative submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the present revision petition is disposed of directing the Rent Controller, Narwana, to decide the eviction petition within a period of six mionths from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge December 1, 2010 “DK”