IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2010 / 8TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 20202 of 2010(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. M.I.PRAKASAN , JOINT EMPLOYMENT OFFICER ERNAKULAM DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. T.T.MEENAKSHI, JUNIOR EMPLOYMENT OFFICER, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE, KOZHIKODE., BY ADV. SRI.K.N.CHANDRABABU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LABOUR DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT SERVICE(KERALAM) DIRECTORATE OF EMPLOYMENT, THYCAUDU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014. 3. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT SERVICE(KERALAM) EMPLOYMENT DIRECTORATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 4. P.A.ABDULKALAM, EMPLOYMENT OFFICER,TOWN EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE, KUNNATHUNADU. 5. D.CHANDRIKA, EMPLOYMENT OFFICER,TOWN EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE, KOCHI. 6. MUHAMMED ABDUL VAHAB, EMPLOYMENT OFFICER,(S.E) DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE, ERNAKULAM. /2/ 7. T.T.VALSAN, EMPLOYMENT OFFICER,(S.E) DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE, KOZHIKODE. 8. N.R.RAJAN, EMPLOYMENT OFFICER, TOWN EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE, THODUPUZHA. 9. M.SANIL KUMAR, EMPLOYMENT OFFICER, TOWN EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE, PEERUMEDU, 10. D.MALLIKA, EMPLOYMENT OFFICER, TOWN EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE, RANNI. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. ARAVINDHKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.20202 OF 2010 (A) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are Junior Employment Officers, aspiring for promotion to the post of Employment Officer. According to the petitioners they are aggrieved by Ext.P5 select list prepared by the DPC that was held on 26.3.2010 and Ext.P13 order promoting respondents 4 to 10. It is stated that this select list was prepared without considering their seniority and communal reservation on the basis that they belong to Scheduled caste communities. 2. Irrespective of the merits of the contentions raised in this writ petition, from the pleadings it is seen that the petitioners have already filed Exts.P10 and P11 representations before the 3rd respondent, Convener of the DPC. Therefore, having regard to the pendency of the aforesaid representations I feel that at this stage what is required is that the 3rd respondent should consider Exts.P10 and P11. Therefore the writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to consider Exts.P10 and P11 and take appropriate WPC.No. 20202/2010 :2 : action in the matter. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/