IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO PETITION NO PETITION NO. 984 of 2009 984 of 2009 984 of 2009 Maj (Retd) Devashish Chakravarty ... Petitioner. Vs. Smt Chinmoyee Chakravarty ...Respondent. Mr K. K. Malpathak, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 02.02. 2009. 02.02. 2009. 02.02. 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner. Perused petition. 2. This petition, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order passed below Exh. 57 in M.P. No. 112 of 2003, dated 21.10.2008, passed by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thane with which no fault can be found, if the order is read in the light of the previous order of this Court dated 30.1.2008 ( Shri Dharmadhikari,J). 3. In the result, no case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. 4. The petitioner is directed to get his name deleted from F.D.Rs. and substitute it with the name of the respondent-wife so as to bring F.D.Rs. in tune with the order dated 30.1.2008. With this direction, the petition is dismissed in limini. No order as to costs. 5. At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner sought permission to withdraw this petition. Prayer made is rejected. (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, J.) J.) J.)