IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No. 24890 of 2007 Between: K.Chakrapani S/o.K.Venkata Padi chetty Secretary, Ayira Vaisyar Telugu Beri Vysya Sabha(Regd) Kalappaachary street, Park town, Chennai-600003 ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Executive officer and Additional commissioner of Endowments, Sri Kalahasteewswara Swamivari Devastanam, Srikalahasti, Chittoor District appointed as Single Trustee to Ayira Vaisyar Telugu, Beri Vysya Sabha, Srikalahasti 2 The Commissioner of Endowments, Boggulakunta Tilak Road, Abids, Hyderabad 3 The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Chittoor Chittoor District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent i.e. the Executive officer and Additional Commissioner of Endowments in issuing the impugned proceedings in Rc.No.C1/3572/2007 dated 11.11.2007 indicating that the commissioner of Endowments in Procgs.No.E4/42753/2007 dated 6.11.2007 had suspended the petitonr and his appointment as Single Trustee to Ayira Vaisyar Telugu Beri Vysya Sabha, Srikalahasti, and consequently directing the petitioner to hand over charge as bad illegal, arbitrary, and one without jurisdiction contrary to the statutory provisions of the Endowments Act, gross violation of principles of natural justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.24890 of 2007 ORDER: Sri M.Vidya Sagar, learned counsel for the petitioner, addressed a letter dated 24.07.2009 to the Registry stating that the petitioner intends to withdraw the writ petition. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA,J 28.07.2009 v v