PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH. *** LPA No. 19 of 2011. Date of decision: January 07, 2011. *** P.R.T.C., and another Versus Darshan Singh. *** Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Acting Chief Justice; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih. *** Present: Shri Anupam Singla, Advocate, for the appellant. *** Ranjan Gogoi, ACJ (Oral) The sole contention advanced in the appeal is that part of the order dated 16.5.1997 with regard to forfeiture of service of the respondent- writ petitioner was not printed/typed in the copy of the said order placed before the learned Single Judge. It is, therefore, argued that the conclusion recorded by the learned Single Judge is erroneous. If the above is the correct position, the appropriate course of remedy for the appellant is to file a review application before the learned Single Judge. We, therefore, do not entertain this appeal and instead leave the appellant with such legal remedies as may be available to him. The LPA stands disposed of with the above direction. (Ranjan Gogoi) (Acting Chief Justice) (Augustine George Masih) January 07, 2011 Judge Malik