IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40674 of 2009 RUDAL YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 30.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner has been named as one of the present accused in the FIR. Material has come during investigation that it is more on account of suspicion expressed by the informant about the presence of the petitioner at the time and place of the occurrence. Certain evidence has also emerged during investigation that the petitioner was present in the function organized by co-villager on the date and time of the alleged occurrence. These are the circumstances which should be considered for enlarging the petitioner on bail. Learned APP for the State certifies part of the submission which has been made at the bar and keeping the above in mind and by giving benefit of doubt at this stage, the petitioner, namely, Rudal Yadav be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 202 of 2007. One of the sureties to be executed by the mother of the petitioner and other by his brother, namely, Ram Singh who has sworn the affidavit in the present bail application on due identification by the court below. Petitioner will not intimidate the - 2 - witnesses and he shall cooperate in the trial by appearing on each and every date fixed in the case either by himself or through his counsel. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)