IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17395 of 2011 1. Sukhdeo Prasad Yadav, Son of late Dukh Haran Yadav. 2. Guddu Kumar. 3. Chhotu Kumar. Both sons of Sukhdeo Prasad Yadav, all resident of MIG-198, Hanuman Nagar, P.S. Kankarbagh, (Patrakar Nagar), District- Patna. Versus The State of Bihar ……… Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 13.06.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are accused for offences punishable under Sections 384 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner had purchased the land in question by registered deed and only thereafter the complainant had purchased the said land. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that after his purchase the petitioner brought some materials for construction of his house but thereafter the dispute arose and the complainant filed the instant case alleging that the building materials of the complainant had been taken away by the petitioner and in that petition all the family members of the petitioner including his son and daughter have been implicated with ulterior motives. Considering the aforesaid facts and 2 circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender of the petitioners, namely, Sukhdeo Prasad Yadav, Guddu Kumar, and Chhotu Kumar within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in the court below, they shall be admitted to bail on executing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Anand Kumar Singh, J.M., Ist Class, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 1466(C) of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Ibrar/ ( S.N. Hussain, J.)