IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 6160 of 1994 Between: Puttagunta Viswanath, minor, rep. by his father and natural guardian P.Sudhakar. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The District Collector, Khammam district, Khammam. 2. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Paloncha mandal, Paloncha, Khammam district. 3. The Sub-Registrar, Kothagudem, Khammam district. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the order of the 2nd respondent in R.C.No. B/6/94 dated 18.1.1994 as illegal and void and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to register the document No.P-5/93 dated 29.12.1992 in respect of Ac.4.01 guntas in Sy.Nos.817/34 of Paloncha village, Khammam district. Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.A.RAMALINGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: Ms.P.Rekha, learned counsel representing Sri A.Ramalingeswara Rao, counsel for petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the statement made by the learned counsel, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA, J 19th July 2004. DA/TVK To 1. The District Collector, Khammam district, Khammam. 2. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Paloncha mandal, Paloncha, Khammam district. 3. The Sub-Registrar, Kothagudem, Khammam district. 4. Two CCs to the G.P. for Revenue, High Court, Hyderabad. 5. Two CD copies.