IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CONTEMPT CONTEMPT CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 88 OF 2004. PETITION NO. 88 OF 2004. PETITION NO. 88 OF 2004. Malegaon Municipal Corporation, Nasik... Petitioner. V/s. Sanjay Pawar. ... Respondents. Shri Suresh Pawar for the petitioner. CORAM CORAM CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 28.4.2006. : 28.4.2006. : 28.4.2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. . Petitioner is alleging contempt against the respondent for not having complied with order of the the Division Bench dated 13.12.2002 passed in First Appeal No. 1768/2002, whereby directions were issued to the appellant (respondent herein) to deposit entire decretal amount with interest and costs within 8 weeks from the date of order, under Order 41 Rule 1(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure. In view of non-compliance of the said order, it is open for the petitioner to execute the decree in accordance with law. In that view of the matter, no case is made out to initiate action under the Contempt of Courts Act. Petition is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)