1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5429/2010 Ku. Varsha Vitthalrao Patmase Vs. Gramin Vikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and 3 others ........................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................... Shri P.B. Patil, Counsel for the Petitioner. Shri A.Z. Jibhkate, Counsel for the R-1 & 2. CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 15th JUNE, 2011. The School Tribunal by its Judgment and Order dated 8.12.2006 allowed the Appeal No.STN/53/2002 filed by the petitioner challenging the termination from service. The order of termination dated 27.6.2000 has been quashed and set aside. However, in stead of granting relief of reinstatement and payment of back wages, the School Tribunal has granted the compensation by way of payment of six months salary to the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court. Undisputedly, the reinstatement and back wages have been denied to the petitioner on the ground, that the post on which the petitioner was working, has been abolished. There is no dispute raised regarding this finding. After the decision of the Tribunal on 8.12.2006, the petitioner has been making representations for grant of .....2/- 2 reinstatement. However, in the absence of such relief being granted by the School Tribunal, such representations were of no consequence. The petitioner has waited from 8.12.2006 and this writ petition has been filed on 30.10.2010. The explanation furnished for such delay is not satisfactory. In view of this, the petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay and laches. Shri P.B.Patil, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner has made complaint that though the compensation has been directed to be paid by the Tribunal within a period of 30 days from the date of Judgment, till this date such amount has not been paid by the respondents. Shri A.Z.Jibhkate, the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent nos.1 and 2 makes a statement that within a period of two weeks from today, the entire amount shall be paid. The said statement is accepted as an undertaking by the respondents before this Court. In view of above, by recording the aforesaid undertaking, the writ petition is dismissed. JUDGE BrWankhede ...../-