IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 25TH JANUARY 2011 / 5TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 2451 of 2011(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- SHAJI THOMAS, S/O.M.K.THOMMAN, AGED 44, MANJAKAL HOUSE, KAKKANADU LANE, KESAVADASAPURAM, ULLOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SMT.I.SHEELA DEVI RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 682 030. 2. TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KANAYANNOOR. 682 011. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KADAMAKUDY. 682 027. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 2451 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 25th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, by Ext.P9(a), he sought mutation of the properties covered by Exts.P1 to P6. It is stated that orders have not been passed and therefore the writ petition is filed. If as stated by the petitioner, such an application has been filed, it is necessary that the 2nd respondent should consider the same. Therefore, taking note of the case of the petitioner regarding the pendency of the aforesaid application, I dispose of this writ petition directing that the 2nd respondent shall consider Ext.P9(a) application made by the petitioner in accordance with the provisions of the Transfer of Registry Rules and pass orders thereon. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp