IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 29TH OCTOBER 2010 / 7TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 32965 of 2010(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- ABDUL SALAM, S/O.IBRAHIM, MOOPANTAKATH, RAHMATH MANZIL, VELLUR, PAYYANNUR, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN SRI.V.VENUGOPAL RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE TAHSILDAR, HOSDURG KASRAGOD-1. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KASARAGOD AT KANHANGAD,KASARAGOD-671 315. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KASARAGOD-671 121. 4. R.CHERIAMBU, S/O.CHIRUKANDA, ELAMBACHI PO, SOUTH TRIKARIPURA, KASARAGOD-671 311. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 32965 OF 2010 (U) ===================== Dated this the 29th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner states that 3 cents of land in R.S.No.138/8 of South Trikaripur Village is sought to be assigned by the 4th respondent. According to the petitioner, against an application of the 4th respondent for assignment of this land, he has filed Ext.P4 objection before the 1st respondent. In this writ petition, all that the petitioner seeks is that, the 1st respondent should consider Ext.P4 objection filed by him also as and when the assignment application made by the 4th respondent is considered. 2. In the nature of the grievance raised, I see no reason to decline the prayer sought for. Therefore, without expressing anything on merits, I direct the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P4 objection filed by the petitioner also, if the same has been received and is pending, when the application made by the 4th respondent is taken up for consideration. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 1st respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp