1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2428 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2429 OF 2009 Narendra Savji Sampat ..Applicant versus M/s. Shah Chemical Corporation & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. S. R. Chitnis – Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amol Patankar for Applicant. Mr. D. F. Sharma for Respondent No. 1. Ms. A. T. Jhaveri – APP for State in Application No. 2428 of 2009. Ms. M. H. Mhatre – APP for State in Application No. 2429 of 2009. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. DATED : 15TH SEPTEMBER, 2009. P.C. : 1. Mr. Chitnis the learned counsel for the Applicant pointed out that the verifications are not in accordance with the law laid down by this court in the case of Amarnath Baijnath Gupta & Anr. vs. Mohini Organics Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. [ 2009 (3) Bom. C.R. 258 ]. Mr. Chitnis further points out that the learned Sessions Court has accepted that the verifications made by the trial court are not in accordance with law vide a paragraph 14 of the impugned orders. 2 2. Apparently, the Sessions Court decided to permit the trial court to continue trials in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Subramanium Sethuraman vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. [ 2004 Vol 106(4) Bom. L.R. 775. 3. In these circumstances, it is not necessary to disturb the orders of the Sessions Court. It is however directed that the trial court shall consider the issue of the legality of the verifications at the time of disposal of the cases on its own merits. Applications are disposed of accordingly. (S. A. BOBDE, J.)