IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 8942 of 2008. Decided on: 13.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Budhi Vallabh Sharma. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 7. Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr. Lokender Thakur, Advocate for respondents No.3, 5 and 6. Respondent No.4 ex-parte. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous with the passage of time. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 13, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?