IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7063 of 2011 INDU DEVI, Wife of Sri Upendra Paswan Resident of village Alawalpur, P.S. Sarai, District – Vaishali …… Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Director, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, I.C.D.S. Directorate, Indira Bhawan, Patna 3. The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur 4. The District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur 5. The Child Development Project Officer, Bhawanpur, District Vaishali ……. Respondents ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr.Dudh Nath Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar Ambastha, G.P. 14 ` Mr. Subodh Kumar, A.C. to G.P. 14 ---- 2 25.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner seeks quashing of the order issued vide memo no. MU-16 dated 27.12.2007 passed by the Director, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, as contained in Annexure 3, whereby she has been removed from the post of Aganwari Sewika. However, it has been fairly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that she has earlier moved this Court with same relief in C.W.J.C. No. 15739 of 2008 and sought permission to withdraw 2 the writ application as she proposed to pursue her representation before the authority. The writ application was disposed of with a direction to decide the proposed representation of the petitioner expeditiously. Thereafter, petitioner claims to have filed representation before the Director, Social Welfare Department, which was duly received on 30.11.2009, a copy of which is appended as Annexure 5 to this writ application. However, it is urged the same is yet to be disposed of despite the earlier direction of this Court to consider the same expeditiously. It is also submitted that the representations of other similarly situated persons, who were also removed by the order as contained in Annexure 3, have already been considered. In above view of the matter, let the petitioner file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 2 within four weeks. If such representation is filed within four weeks along with a copy of the order, let the respondent no. 2 consider and dispose of the same on its own merit and in accordance with law within two months thereafter and a copy of such decision having 3 been taken be communicated to the petitioner. This disposes of the writ petition. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)