THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No.30531 of 2011 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents, in interfering with the formation of the roads pursuant to the order of the second respondent dated 18.10.2011, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioners claim to be owners of different extents of lands in different survey numbers of Pregnapur Village, Gajwel Mandal, Medak District. They made applications to the revenue authorities for conversion of their agricultural lands into non- agricultural lands. The fifth respondent accorded permission for conversion of agricultural lands into non-agricultural lands by proceedings Nos.D/233/2011 and D/232/2011 dated 27.01.2011 in respect of extents of Ac.12.39¾ guntas and Ac.5.39 guntas respectively. The second respondent, in his proceedings dated 18.10.2011, approved the draft layout for formation of roads in the aforesaid extent of lands. The petitioners’ grievance, in short, is that the respondents are obstructing with the formation of the roads despite approval of layout for the said purpose. A counter affidavit is filed by the seventh respondent wherein it is stated that they preferred an appeal to the Joint Collector, Medak at Sangareddy (fourth respondent) against proceedings No.D/233/2011, dated 27.01.2011, of the fifth respondent regarding conversion of agricultural lands into non- agricultural lands in respect of an extent of Ac.12.39¾ guntas and that the appeal is pending consideration before the fourth respondent, who, by his order dated 01.12.2011, suspended the order of the fifth respondent pending disposal of the appeal. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue (Telangana Area), on instructions, submits that the government is not, in any manner, interfering with lands belonging to the petitioners. Recording the submission of the learned Government Pleader that the government is not interfering with lands belonging to the petitioners, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the fourth respondent has to take appropriate decision, in accordance with law, in respect of an extent of Ac.12.39¾ guntas in the appeal pending consideration before him. It is also made clear that till a final decision is taken by the fourth respondent, no further development shall be taken in respect of an extent of Ac.12.39¾ guntas as mentioned in the schedule to proceedings No.D/233/2011 dated 27.01.2011 of the fifth respondent and, with regard to the other extents of land, the petitioners are at liberty to make use of them. No order as to costs. K.C.BHANU, J Dt:28.12.2011 usd