AB 2713/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. SARMA Heard Mr. L. Mohan, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr . B.S. Sinha, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State-responden t. By this application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioner, namely Saye d Soan Ahmed, has prayed for pre-arrest bail, in connection with Nalbari P.S. Ca se No.444/2011, under Section 498(A) IPC. Perused the Case Diary. The allegation made against the petitioner is that the petitioner, who is the hu sband of the informant, tortured the informant both physically and mentally in c onnection with demand of dowry and that the informant was compelled to leave the marital home on 30.07.2011, from which date, she has been taken shelter in her parents’ house. The petitioner is on pre-arrest bail w.e.f. 05.09.2011. Having heard the learned counsel for both the parties and considering the materi als on record, I find no reason for custodial interrogation of the petitioner. Accordingly, the interim order, dated 05.09.2011, in favour of the petitioner af oresaid, is made absolute, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall ap pear before the Investigating Officer within 7(seven) days from this date and on such other dates as may be so required by the Investigating Officer. It is furt her provided that the petitioner shall not interfere with the investigation in a ny manner. Return the Case Diary. The A.B. Application is disposed of.