IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.29316 OF 2008 1. LALAN CHAUHAN, SON OF MAHAJAN CHAUHAN 2. BHAGMATI DEVI, WIFE OF LAGAN CHAUHAN 3. USHA DEVI, WIFE OF LALAN CHAUHAN 4. URMILA DEVI, WIFE OF UMESH CHAUHAN 5. KRISHNA CHAUHAN @ KRISHNA MAHTO, SON OF MAHAJAN CHAUHAN 6. ASHOK KUMAR @ ASHOK CHAUHAN, SON OF LAGAN CHAUHAN ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE FATHA (MIA TOLI), POLICE STATION AND DISTRICT GOPALGANJ ……………………………………………………………………..PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. VIDHAWATI DEVI, WIFE OF KEDAR PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLGE FATHAN, POST OFFICE, POLICE STATION AND DISTRICT GOPALGANJ ………………………………………………………………………OPPOSITE PARTIES *********** 2 22/06/2011 The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 05.05.2008 passed in Complaint Case No. 2183 of 2007 (Trial No. 2417 of 2008) by which the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gopalganj has taken cognizance for the offences alleged to have been committed under Sections 147, 323, 354 & 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that the petitioners had taken a loan from the complainant which they refused to pay. On making a demand, the petitioners formed an unlawful assembly and threatened the complainant. From the complaint petition, it would appear that prima facie, a case is made out and as such, this Court does not find any ground for interfering with the impugned order, especially at this stage of the case. This application is accordingly dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )