2511can88.11.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION (N) NO.88 OF 2011 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.78 OF 2011 (D) Sahebrao Bapurao Nagpurkar Vs. Shri Nana Vithoba Tekade and others. ........................................................................................................................................................ ..... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................................ ..... Shri P.D.Meghe, Counsel for the Petitioner. Mrs.K.R.Deshpande, AGP. CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 25th NOVEMBER, 2011. This application is for recall of the order dated 11.8.2011 passed by this Court. Hence, the said order is reproduced below-- “Coram : R.K.Deshpande, J. Dated : 11th August, 2011 Shri Joshi, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1 and 2, has filed a pursis dated 11-8-2011, which is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification, stating therein that the joining letter has been issued to the petitioner on 8-8-2011. He further makes a statement, after taking instructions from the Secretary of the Society, who is present in this Court, that the petitioner has joined the post. In view of this, nothing survives in this contempt petition. The contempt proceedings are, therefore, dropped.” .....2/- 2511can88.11.odt 2 The recall of the aforesaid order is sought on the ground that though the petitioner has been reinstated in service, the salary bills after the date of reinstatement have not been forwarded to the Education Officer for sanction nor the salary is being paid to the petitioner from the date of reinstatement. The specific question was put up to the learned Counsel to point out any order either passed by the School Tribunal or by this Court, directing the respondents to prepare the salary bills of the petitioner upon reinstatement in service and make the payment of salary regularly during the period when the petitioner was in service. The learned Counsel could not point out any such order. Hence no case is made out for recall of the order. The application is dismissed. JUDGE BrWankhede ...../-