IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINTAL C- 482 No. 285 of 2004 Sardar Tara Singh ………….Applicant. Versus State of Uttaranchal and others. ……….Opposite Parties. Mrs. S.P.S. Pawar, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri H.C. Pathak, for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, learned A.G.A. for the State/respondent no. 1. None appears for rest of the respondents. 16th September, 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. This application filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is directed against the order dated 22.4.2004 passed by the Sessions Judge, Haridwar in Criminal Revision No. 35 of 2004 Sardar Tara Singh Vs. Sardar Jogendra Singh and others and order dated 20.3.2004 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Roorkee in Criminal Case No. 756 of 2003 State Vs. Jogendra and others, Police Station Gang Neher Roorkee, District Haridwar. 2. Perused the order dated 20.3.2004 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee, whereby the application dated 6.2.2004 has been rejected having no force in it. The said order is based upon the report submitted by the Investigating Officer, whereby the Certificate issued by the S.G.P.C. has been held to be genuine. Thereafter, against the said order, a revision being Revision No. 35 of 2004 was preferred before the District & Sessions Judge, Haridwar. The said revision was also dismissed as having no force after taking into consideration the relevant evidence available on record and a finding has been 2 recorded that no case is made out against the respondents under Section 466, 468, 471, 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. It has further been recorded that if there is any case regarding the management, the jurisdiction to decide the same vests in the Civil Court. 3. Since the finding of the trial Court as well as of the revisional Court is based upon the report submitted by the Investing Officer and other relevant evidence available on record, I find the orders passed by the courts below perfectly justified and present application filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is abuse of process of law. 4. Therefore, present application filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is dismissed. (P.C. Verma, J.) 16.9.2008 Rathour