IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH JULY 2009 / 17TH ASHADHA 1931 RP.No. 560 of 2009() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.15603/2008 Dated 26/06/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS --------------------------------- 1. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERATE OF EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ASST. EXCISE COMMISSIONER, ALAPPUZHA. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSHKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS -------------------------- 1. SUDHAKARAN, S/O.MADHAVAN, KOCHUTHOTTINGAL, KANICHUKULANGARA, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. SYAMALATHA, D/O.BHAVANI AMMA, BHAVANI NILAYAM, KANICHUKULANGARA, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 3. SUVARNAKUMAR, S/O.NARAYANAN, VATTAKKATTUVELI, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- R.P.No.560/09 in W.P.(C).No.15603/08 ------------------------ Dated this the 8th day of July, 2009. O R D E R WP(c).No.15603/08 was disposed of by judgment dated 26th June, 2008, recording the submission made by the Government Pleader that the petitioner was heard and that final orders will be passed immediately. On that basis status quo was also ordered to be maintained. It is now disclosed that it was due to a factual mistake committed in the office, that the Government Pleader made the submission and the petitioner was not heard. This discloses that the judgment is vitiated by errors apparent on the face of the judgment and therefore the Review petition is allowed and the judgment is recalled. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/