HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3763 of 2010 Between: Pothamsetti Sesha Reddy. … Petitioner And Pathamsetti Srinivasareddy. … Respondent This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3763 of 2010 ORDER:- This revision under Article 227 of the Constitution, to revise the order of the Junior Civil Judge, Anaparthy, dated 06.08.2010, in allowing I.A.No.239 of 2010 in I.A.No.51 of 2009 in O.S.No.26 of 2009, filed to send the partition list containing the original signatures of the petitioner/respondent in the said I.A., along with his admitted signatures to compare the same with Ex.A1 – disputed signatures, to the handwriting expert. The respondent/plaintiff filed the suit for specific performance of the agreement of sale, dated 23.01.1999-Ex.A1, in which he filed I.A.No.552 of 2009 to send Ex.A1-sale agreement to the handwriting expert to compare the disputed signatures with the admitted signatures of the petitioner herein. The said I.A. was allowed and the document was sent to the handwriting expert, A.P.Forensic Science Laboratory, who in turn returned the same, with a request to send the admitted signatures of the petitioner written in the normal course of business for the purpose of comparison. On such return, respondent/plaintiff filed the impugned I.A., to send the original of the partition list, which contains the original signatures of the petitioner/defendant along with his admitted signatures. The trial court by the impugned order rejecting the objection of the petitioner/defendant viz., that the partition deed is not original and that it is only a photocopy, was of the view that the partition deed is the original one and, therefore, the same can be sent for comparison and accordingly ordered the I.A. The said order of the trial court is a discretionary order. The petitioner cannot question the same at this stage, since it is open for him to file objections to the report of the handwriting expert, if any. Further, the opinion of the handwriting expert will not attain finality, as the same will always be subject to the final orders in the suit. In view of the same, no infirmity is discernable with the order passed by the trial Court, warranting interference. The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. _________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J 27th August 2010 lmv