IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2011 / 24TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 19216 of 2011(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- ANIL KUMAR T.V., ELECTRICAL WORKER (MAZDOOR), KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, NELLIKKUNNU ELECTRICAL SECTION, KASARAGOD. BY ADV. MR. M.SASINDRAN MR. V.VENUGOPAL RESPONDENT: --------------- THE CHIEF ENGINEER(HRM), KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. BY MR.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 19216 of 2011(B) APPENDIX -------------- PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ----------------------------------- P1: A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 5.2.09 IN WP(C) NO.31796/08 P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE ADDENDUM NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE ADVISE MEMO DATED 25.2.10 P4: A TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO ISSUED BY THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECRICITY CIRCLE, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, KASARAGOAD DATED 31.3.10 APPOINTING THE PETITIONER AS MAZDOOR IN THE BOARD. P5: A TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE EXECUTIVE EGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, KASARAGOD DATED 22.11.2011 P6: A TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVAT PAGES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE RESPONDENT NO.EB4(a)/PRO/03/2011 DATED 28.2.11 P7: A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 27.3.2011 RESPPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL RKC //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 19216 of 2011-B - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 15th day of July, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner was included in the rank list for appointment of Electricity Worker. It is pointed out that the same was prepared in the light of the directions issued by this Court in the judgment in W.P.(C) No.31796/2008. He has already included as rank No.75-A, in between rank Nos.75 and 76. The petitioner has satisfactorily completed his probation on 8.10.2010. 2. The grievance raised in the writ petition is that in Ext.P6 list prepared by the Board, the petitioner's name has not been included. Accordingly, the petitioner has filed Ext.P7 representation before the respondent. 3. Heard learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. 4. There will be a direction to the respondent herein to take a decision on Ext.P7 and communicate the same to the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the wpc 19216/2011 2 writ petition before the respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/