—-— 1 ^ /^Tf^e-nGl^cl <'<?ti^<"^H IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHTTISGARH AT BILASPUR. WRITPETITION No. 1361 OF 2003. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^A .^9P^' y;^' ^^' .<?- : Baliram sahu, S/o Shri Nutram Shhu, Aged about 62 years, R/o Village- Dindoury, Gram Panchayat Surajpura, Tahsil Lormi, District Bilaspur, (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattishgarh, Through : The Secretary , Panchayat Avam Gramin Vikas Vibhag , D. K. S. Bhawan , Raipur, (C.G.). 2. The Collector, Bilaspur District, Bilaspur , (C.G.). 3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Lormi , District Bilaspur , (C.G.). 4. Gram Panchayat, Surajpura, Through : The Secretary , Janpad Panchayat Lormi , District Bilaspur, (C.G.). 5. Tokhan Ram Sahu S/o Baldau Ram Sahu, aged about 34 years, R/o village Dinoury , Post Chhattan, Tehsil Lormi, District Bilaspur, (C.G.). /2/ IT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTIoy ^£_INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APffiOFRIAT^ iT _IN JHE NATURE OF M^ID/MJS/CERTICM^R.I ETC. OR DIBECTION/OBDER ^LJ]j£ LIKE NATUP.E ETC. ^_.^.^^. :%.. f!^s3^/ '^B^.^^^ v mOH COUK'l' OF CHHA'ITmOARH AT BILA8PUM pEn'noNER WmTPETmONNo. 1361 of2003 : BaliramSahu. VERSUS RBSPONDENTS : StateofChhattisgarii&Otfaers. WRIT PETmQNt^DERARTICIJS 226/227 QFTHE CQNSTFr^ OFINDIA SBLHon'bMSMSa^^K^A^tttwMtJ. Present: Shri Rakesh Pandey, Advoeate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Moortfay, Deputy Advocaie General forthe State/ Rcspondant No. 1 to 3. ORDISRCQRAX^ (Passed on 29tn day ofJane, 2011) 1. Shri Paadey, leamed counsel appearing fw the petltiosier subfmits thai ih@ respondenis tiave not iaken any &ctioti till date on the representation ofthe petitioner datN tiil (Annexure P/l) which was received by rospondetrt No. 2 oa 05.12.2002. 2» Shri Moorttiy, leamed Deputy Advocate Getseral appearing for the State/respondent No. 1 to 3 submite Aat if the representation, as afbrestated, is pen<Mng consideration, the Collector will examine the entire grievance offhe petitioner as expeditiou^ly as possible. 3. In view of the tbregoing, accordiag to leamed counsel tor the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication atfhis stage. 4. Accordingly, tiie respondait No. 2 i.e. tiie Colleetor, Bilaspur, is directedto look mto the griev<uic@s raised in the afbrestated representation and take appropriate steps ixi accardaace witti law, on ite own metits, as early as poasible., preferably within a period of six weeks from today» 5. With the afbresaid obsen?atioja aad direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ABlit,