Bwm; ^ y ^....,..<"eK39» ''..te^S'l'li&a,., |:Sj;-^?"a-*irSG!i" IN THE HIGH COURT OF TUDIC^TORE AT BILASFUR CHHATTISGARH PETITIONERS M ^%?s .y.^ ^^y ly '» ^" "^. ^'^ urs-^- 2^ 11 W.P. N0. ......T.°.l.'^..../2004 1] Sunil Kumar Mhaskey S/o. Kashinath Mhaskey, Aged about 49 years, R/o. Pandal Road, Sharikar Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil & DistricrRaipur (C.G.) 2] Jashpal Singh S/o. Late Pratap Singh Aged about 40 yeais, R/o. Village Pandari Marg, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) 3] Ajay Shrivastav S/o. Krit Narayan Shrivastav, Aged about 35 years, R/o. Village Pandari Marg, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) 4] Nand Kumar S/ o. R.R. Sahu, Aged about 31 years, R/o. Village Pandari Marg, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Enviromnent and Urhan Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipiu- (C.G.) 2] The Municipal Corporation, Raipur a body incorporated under Section 7 of fhe Chhattisgarh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956, having perpetual succession and common seal having its office at Malviya Road, Raipur. 3] Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4^ Raipur Development Authority, Through- Its Chief Executive Officer, G.E. Road, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS: As stated above in the cause titie. RESPONDENTS /^' an^CTwf^iw (TaiTan^isbiicb .^IP' 'vsy y •^iis '9s ^y «ril vi-oq "yioirto, y>TTl'H<i<s, Rrti-<iy< ri^ ...W.IP.^.....^.60^., 3[I^?1V (ijcjf^d.Ei) ?Tgiw?^a3ii^n Rafcur 12-8-2005 Shri Monoj Paranjpe, Shri Sandeep Dubey, No.l. Shri Pankaj Agrowal, Heard. So far return has not The petitioners' cas^ No.116/2, Rokba 0.44 acrea^O P.H. No.109, &istrict: bevelopment Authority with^i acquisition proceedings. Th^ that if they move to the R.l allotted to the petitioners petitioners made several authorities have not Laarned counsel for itiat the petitioners may respondent No.4 and he be accordance witti law to whicl^ 4 has no objection. decided those hle <ni«fn<il']llllrtY^ffe'^t •(Rl't-dl'! iR3lf^H3II^?I c(>unsel for The petitioners. $ovt. Advooate for the State/reSpondent c^unsel for respondents No.2 to 4. l^een fited on behaff of respondents. js that their land bearing Khasra >.177 hectares situated at Pondari Tcsrcii was taken over by the Raipur i^ut any au'thority of law and without any petitioners were assured at that time L, Then 40% of the acquired land wi!l be in lieu of -that land. Thereafter, tiie i^iresentations, but the respondent representations. jrtie petitioners makes a limited request h|e ailowed to make a representation to directed to decide the representation in leamed counsel for respondents No.2 to DlA SP/FS/2005-20,000 w^w TfTJ""r"Fr"'f''TT^' 'llr- ;ti, '& ii'J8' [:?@^^^@^^^^^@%^^y@@^]_ c/'" :/') an^Tifir 'sn^r OTwgftcT fciiii!-*^ F'^^^t^^^' Borve O •} ^sf -^wici'i), siTn*ris, fci<-)i+fy 3n^?r HWWI ShHlcf) ^ 200 311^1 ^kiiwflfer -^ r^quest In view of the above, petitioners is just and fair. detailed representation to re^| tiie points aanci respondenl) representation wiltiin a period| of copy of the representation. after considering atl the pape|'s R.G.A. reaches to the conclut decision the petitioners are erjtitted Jand of the petitioners aireasfy cloiim of the petitioners for Pandari Tarai subject to avaii^ibility avaibbte, •then they can consid^r consent of the petitioners. With the direction aforelsaid, In view of this order, IJ of. Parties are enTitted <fii<il<i41-< tiii(iTffte^<Ri«;i< ^sri^iraD^r macte by leapned counsel for the The petitioners are allowed to make a pondent No.4 wfthin a week ruising ail No.4 is dir^cted to decicie the of 4 months from The date of receipt However, at tiie time of taking decision •s submitted by the petitioners, if the sion That in vtew of the R&A's policy for 40% land in exchon9e of the acquired, then they can consider the allotment of 40% land preferably at of the land- If that land is not sr altotment of any oltier land with The I, the petition stands disposed of. A. No.8178/2004 also stonds disposed for ejertified copy of This order. ^ar- L.C. Bhadoo judge (i^^i^)