CWP No. 7937 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 7937 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: May 05, 2011 Rajinder Parkash .........PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana and others ........ RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). AJAI LAMBA, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel contends that vide Annexure P-7, an application made to the authorities, it has been shown that respondent no. 5-Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Village Gindokhar, Tehsil and District Rewari, has enabled making of ration card on the basis of wrong facts to give undue advantage to respondents no. 6 and 7. Despite such an application having been made, no action has been taken. 2. Notice of motion. 3. On the asking of the Court, Mr. S.S. Nara, Sr. DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Requisite number of copies of the writ petition have been handed over to him in Court. 4. Heard. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has not been able to justify the inaction on the part of the authorities in not taking cognizance of complaint/application Annexure P-7. 6. In view of the above, this petition is allowed. 7. Respondent no. 3 i.e. Deputy Commissioner, Rewari is directed to CWP No. 7937 of 2011 2 have an inquiry conducted in regard to the allegations made in application Annexure P-7 and in case the Sarpanch or any other official is found to have misconducted, take action as permissible in law. 8. The order is only confined in directing holding of inquiry and taking action, in case some official is found having abused the process of law. The facts and circumstances have not been considered in context of merit. 05.05.2011 (AJAI LAMBA) shivani JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?