^a Singl& Benc ^•^^- ^fi) ^t^1-"""" ...^ INTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^'?7^ W.P.(S( N0. PETITIONER .Vr' RESPONDENTS <A %o(c s^ ^,^ /2006 R.D. Sori, S/o. Late Shri Buddhu Ram Sori, aged about 49, R/o, Sichai Colony, Quarter No. G-5,1 Dhamtari District Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, . Through Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Engineer in Chief, ,. Water Resources Department, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Sub Divisional Officer,. Water Resources .Department, Sub Division, Raigarh, District Raigarh • 4. Secretary, Panchayat and Gramin Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 5. Joint Secretaiy, / Panchayat and Gramin Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY-OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE BttArTER e—' XI-HC-78 qi*1WI Sh<4|ch • SSr^tPTRTq', ®Tfl'M'l<»,(clirfiyy 5'..^.3.<^^ 200^ SVt^T Vf^K (l^clf^sj ^ET) an^rwf^TR; craT.gBs'rgw ??tiTW ^fer sn^r 18^-2006 Mr. Sunil Otwani, counsel fo( Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy G( advance copy. Heard. The petitioner's case is tha( the Water Resources Department P-1) he was sent on deputation Devetopment. In compliance ol| Department of Panchayat & Rura) of the Water Rssourees Departmejnt 2-2006 and the same has beent petitioner made a representation Development stating therein tha^ Department of Panchayat & Rura!| being decided. Having heard teamed petition, the petitioner has alread))1 Rural Devetopment in pursuan^ thersafter, that order has been petitions. That order was quash^d Advocate General on behalf of W< scheme for sending the Enginee|r e Pradhan Mantri Gram Therefore, in the circumstati the Department of Panchayat & passing the order regarding PMQSY courtsel Sadak'ifojana ^PlfeiftT Hmfl''ff fet^t ^TRTC ^? sri^ir 3n^?r |rthepetitioner. tvt- Advocate for the State/respondents, on i^ he was working as Assistant Engineer in ^nd videorder dated 10-2-2006 (Annexure |to the Department of Panchayat & Rural that order, the petitioner joined in the Development. Later on, other Engineers had chaiienged the said order dated 10- quashed by this Court. Thereafter, the |to the Departmsnt of Panchayat & Rurai he does not want to continue in the |Development, but his representation is not rjsel for the parties and having perused the joined in the Department of Panchayat & t;e of the order dated 10-2-2006 and ijjuashed qua the petitioners who filed the on the submission made by the Deputy ie State that the State has framed a new rs of Water Resources Department under (PMGSY) scheme. ices, as the petitioner has already joined in ^ural Development, the respondents while scheme in respect of the Engineers of P.T.O. J? XI-HC-78 73[^WvPf, ©Tn+l'ie,R<rll+fy< »-TTH<'rTsb*llch ^ 200 3TI^?rqsraT (li<=lldsl^) •m^Tqirf^w ^ ciwsi^raiK[cb Baive TOITW iifer sn^r •~'S^ Water Resourees Department shofild as the petitioner belongs to Wat^r should pass appropriate order a!o]ng the services of the petitioner. Til| Departmsnt of Panchayat & Rura( alreadyjoined. With the directions aforesaid Parties are entitled for certififed <*il^Ff1<fl-< HWvfi if te'^f' TfSRSTC ^aTl^Tsn^r aiso consider the case of the petitioner, Resourees Department, therefore, they with the other Engineere in respect of then, the petitioner shail continue in the Development on the post where he has , the petition stands disposed of. copyofthisorder. ^•w P.T.O.