IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.694 of 2006 ASHOK KUMAR SINGH Versus ARVIND KUMAR SINGH & ORS ----------- 9 6/11/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 19.4.2006, whereby and whereunder, the court below has rejected prayer of the petitioner to adjourn the proceedings awaiting result of civil revision application directed against the earlier order dated 6.9.2005. Mr. Dronacharya, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has produced before this Court the order dated 24.1.2007 which was passed in Civil Revision No. 2028 of 2005, whereby and whereunder, the aforementioned order dated 6.9.2005 had been set aside. It, thus, appears that there were genuine reasons for the petitioner to seek adjournment only because civil revision application (C.R. No. 2028 of 2005) could not be taken up by this Court, which led to the impugned order. Thus, taking interest of justice into consideration this Court would set aside the 2 aforementioned impugned order dated 19.4.2006 and direct the court below to allow the petitioner to adduce his evidence, which musts be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If the petitioner does not adduce his evidence in the aforementioned period, the court below will be at liberty to proceed with the case. With the aforementioned observations/ directions this application is allowed. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar