1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 350 OF 2011. Nandlal Puranlalji Chaudhari .vs. The State of Maharashtra & others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. S.B. Tambulkar, Advocate for petitioner, Mrs. S.S. Jachak, A.P.P. for respondent nos. 1 to 4. CORAM : MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATED : JULY 4, 2011. Heard learned Advocate for petitioner and learned A.P.P. for respondent nos. 1 to 4. 2] The petitioner is seeking directions from this Court to respondent no.4, i.e. the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Gondia to pass an order of externment against respondent nos. 5 to 9. According to the petitioner, respondent nos. 5 to 9 are history-sheeters and, therefore, it is necessary that an order of externment be issued against them. 3] As far as externment and detention orders are 2 concerned, it is only if the concerned authorities are subjectively satisfied that there is a need to do so, that an order can be passed. This Court cannot interfere in the subjective satisfaction of either the Externing Authority or the Detaining Authority. Moreover, as pointed out by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the respondent nos. 5 and 7 to 9 are in custody in C.R. No. 16/11 of Ramnagar Police Station, Gondia. The said case is under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The respondent no.6 is also an accused in the said case and he is absconding at present. Looking to the fact that the respondent nos. 5 and 7 to 9 are already in custody and respondent no.6 is a wanted accused in the murder case, we see no reason to interfere in the present matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed. JUDGE. JUDGE. J.