IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36747 of 2008 SUBHASH YADAV @ BIPIN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Shekhar Kumar Singh For the State: Mr. N.N.Tiwary,APP ---- 3. 22.12.2008 Petitioner is an accused in a case under section 392 of the Penal Code and has been implicated by four witnesses. He is in jail custody since 30.9.2007. The witnesses who implicated the petitioner in this case, have been examined but have not supported the prosecution case so submitted by counsel for the petitioner. No sooner the petitioner was apprehended he ought to have requested the court concerned to amalgamate his case also with the trial which was going on from before in the court below. He having not done so he has been languishing in jail custody for about 15 months without any fault of the court. In the circumstances, I direct the court concerned to again examine the witnesses who have already been examined in the connected trial as early as possible in any case within three months from today and thereafter pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. AI (V.N.Sinha,J)