WP(C) 3885/2003 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY The petitioner challenges the appointment of the Respondent No.5 as In-charge He admaster of Tarabari Girls’ ME School of Nagaon district. The said in-charge ar rangement was ordered by the District Elementary Education Officer, Nagaon by th e order dated 21.3.2003 (Annexure-F). However, Mr. B. Rahman, learned counsel representing the Respondent No.5 has pr oduced a subsequent order of the DEEO, Nagaon passed on 29th November, 2004 to s how that in pursuant to the selection made by the District Level Selection Board , the Respondent No.5, Md. Obaiduallah was regularly promoted as Headmaster aft er retirement of the earlier Headmaster and the learned counsel further submits that the Respondent No.5 is functioning as regular Headmaster in Tarabari Girls’ ME School since then. Mr. B. Gogoi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner accordingly submits t hat since the impugned in-charge arrangement is not continuing and a regular Hea dmaster has been posted, the petitioner may not have a subsisting grievance on t he then posting of an in-charge Headmaster. Mr. SK Das, learned Standing Counsel, Education submits that Tarabari Girls’ ME School is now managed by a regularly promoted Headmaster. In view of above, I see no reason to keep this case pending and accordingly it i s ordered to be closed. A copy of the regular promotion order dated 29.11.2004 issued by the DEEO, Assam , for the Respondent No.5 be kept in the case record.