IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1187 of 2010 RUBI DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 15.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that on account of the disappearance of his son aged about 12 years, the petitioner lodged Patna Sadar Jakkanpur P.S. Case No. 275 of 2008 on 27th December, 2008. It is submitted that till date the investigation of the case has not been completed and the fate of his son is not known. Learned counsel for the State files a counter affidavit and submits that the investigation is in progress. Learned counsel also drawn the attention of the Court to the letter dated 14th January, 2009 in connection with the investigation of the case whereby the Investigating Officer was permitted to go to Surat and enquire properly from Santosh Kumar who happens to be the relative of the brother of the petitioner. However, it is submitted that the said Santosh Kumar and one Rinki Devi, who happens to be the sister-in-law of the petitioner, who were involved in the disappearance of the son of the petitioner, have been arrested. Considering the submissions of the parties, it goes without saying that the investigation of the aforesaid police ought to have been completed without delay. Accordingly, let the investigation of the aforesaid police case be completed expeditiously without unnecessary delay and upon completion of investigation police report may also be submitted immediately. The writ application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)