1 cra567.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Revision Application No. 567 of 2010 Mr. Arjun Maruti Khamkar ... Applicant v/s. Sou. Leela Ashok Jain ... Respondent Mr. Jaydeep S. Deo for the applicant. CORAM:- B.R. GAVAI, J DATED :- MARCH 21, 2011. P.C. By way of present revision application, the petitioner challenges the order dated 10th August, 2010. It is the contention of the petitioner that since according to the respondent-plaintiff, the suit is between the gratuitous licensee and licensor, the only Court of Small Causes Court will have jurisdiction to entertain the suit. 2. The learned trial Court has found that from the perusal of the plaint, it would reveal that possession has not been asked on the basis of relationship of licensor and licensee. It has been found that plaintiff has contended that 2 cra567.10.sxw defendant has demolished the construction of the plaintiffs and started construction by making encroachment. The learned trial Court found that in view of Entry No. 19 of the Second Schedule of Provincial Small Causes Court, 1887, the relief claimed by the plaintiff would be beyond the jurisdiction of Small Causes Court Act. 3. No perversity is noticed with the findings of the learned trial Court to warrant interference. Rejected. (B.R. GAVAI, J)