IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 5TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 16TH MAGHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 844 of 2007(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.28806/2001 Dated 25/11/2005 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER -------------------------------------- M.T.PRABHAKARAN PILLAI, S/O.NARAYANAN NAIR, AGED 61 YEARS, MADATHIKUDY, MUNDAKKUZHA, PERUMBAVOOR- 683 546 (HEAD SURVEYOR (RETD.) RE-SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT OFFICE, ALWAYE). BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENTS/1ST AND 3RD RESPONDENTS ------------------------------------ 1. DR.NIVEDITHA P.HARAN, FATHER'S NAME AND AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. SRI.CHANDRASEKHARAN, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF SURVEY & LAND RECORDS (DIRECTOR-IN- CHARGE), SURVEY DIRECTORATE, VAZHUTHACAUD, TRIVANDRUM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. NANDAKUMAR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- Cont. Case No. 844 of 2007 -------------------------- Dated this the 5th February, 2008 J U D G M E N T In my view, if the petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure R2 (a), it is open to him to pursue his remedies in relation there to. In circumstances where an order has been passed, I am of the view that it is not necessary to proceed further with the Contempt of Court Case. Accordingly, the Contempt of Court Case is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner. (V.GIRI, JUDGE) ma K.THANKAPPAN,J CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999 ORDER 25th May, 2007