^- 2^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR W.P. (S) No. 6537 of 2007 PETITIONER RESPONDENT8 2 3 Deepak Kumar Baghel, S/o Shri R.K. Baghel, aged about 47 years, Assistaut Teacher Govt. Prunary School Chliote Paudar Muda, Block Kharsia, Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretaiy, Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur(C.G.) District Education Of&cer Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Block Education Of&cer, Block Kharsia, Distnct - Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OP THE CONSTITXmON OF INDIA Appearance: Shri Aiul Mouiya, coansel for fhe petitioner. Shri Pradeep Singh, Panel Lawyer tbr the State on. advance copy. (31.10.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA^J Heard on adinission. Leamed counsel for the petitioner subxnits that the petitioner has passed D.Ed. examiuaUon on his own expenses, therefore, he is entitled to receive two advauce increinents accordiug to circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also subimts that in maay identical matters, the petitions have been atlowed in terms offhc order passed in the case of YtishwantKwnar BharMhuai Vs. SIuntctpal CorporaSS.on, Durs andanother f2006 OS MPJK-CG 96}. He submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by fhe said judgment. This legal position is not disputed by the learned counsel for the State. However, he subltdts fhat fhe order may be passed ia tenns of fhe said judgment, but it shatl be subjected to verification reganling petitioner's such quali&cation. W.P.(S)No. 6537/2007 2^: Accordiagly, ttus writ petition is aUowed iu tenns of fhe order passed ia case of Yashwant Kuniar Bharachuaj Vs. Mumdpal Corporation, Durg and arwther (Supra) subject to verification offhe facts as to whether fhe petitioner had acquired D.Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whefher he has been paid two advaace iucreuients or not The petition staiids fiaatly disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ^'