IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 28 OF 2010 SHRI. SAVLO ALIAS JEEVAN DIVKAR ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. DATTA SHREEPADA NAIK ... Respondent Mr. M.S. Joshi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 4th May, 2010 P.C.: Heard. 2. The petitioner is an advocate. Process was issued against him by order dated 18/07/2009 under Section 499/500 IPC. The petitioner has not challenged the said order till date. The petitioner then filed an application dated 20/08/2009 purporting it to be an application under Section 258 of the Code (Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973) praying therein that the proceedings against the petitioner (A5 in the said case) be dropped. That application came to be dismissed by the impugned order dated 15/12/2009, inter alia, on the ground that the provision of Section 258 of the Code was not applicable to a summons case which was filed on a private complaint. That conclusion cannot be faulted. 3. In the circumstances, therefore, I find there is no merit in this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code. Petitioner is at liberty to challenge the said order dated 18/07/2009 in case he so desires before the appropriate Court. Petition disposed of. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH