IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN THURSDAY, THE 7TH JULY 2011 / 16TH ASHADHA 1933 WA.No. 939 of 2011() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.8511/2011 .................... APPELLANT: PETITIONER: ------------------------- N.C.ALEXANDER, NELPURA HOUSE, INDIRA NAGAR, DEVALOKAM P.O., KOTTAYAM-38. BY ADV. SRI.M.S.IMTHIYAZ AHAMMED SRI.SHIRAZ ABDULLA RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------- 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, ROADS & BRIDGES CORPORATION, REGD.OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, PREETHI BUILDING, M.V.ROAD, PALARIVATTOM, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 025. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, ROADS & BRIDGES CORPORATION, REGD.OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, PREETHI BUILDING, M.V.ROAD, PALARIVATTOM, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 025. S.C. SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR, RBDCK. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & P.S. GOPINATHAN, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.A. NO. 939 OF 2011 = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2011. J U D G M E N T C.N. Ramachandran Nair, J. This writ appeal is filed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge declining to interfere with the cancellation of contract, black listing and further action proposed against the petitioner. According to the learned Single Judge, since the allegation pertains to breach of contract in regard to the award of a contract for toll collection writ is not the remedy. We do not find anything wrong in the finding of the learned Single Judge because issues are disputed and in respect of a dispute arising under a contract, petitioner's remedy is before the civil court. We do not find any ground to interfere with the judgment of the learned Single Judge. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed. C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, (JUDGE). P.S. GOPINATHAN, (JUDGE) knc/-