IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3683 of 2010 NITU DEVI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 02.02.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Section 366A of the Penal Code. As per F.I.R., the petitioner called the victim to her house from where she eloped and or kidnapped by the full brother of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner tried to impress upon the Court that this was with the consent of the victim who was already a married woman. This Court finds that this petitioner called the victim to her house has been supported in course of investigation. In my view, petitioner is not entitled to anticipatory bail. Let petitioner, above named, surrender in the Court below and apply for regular bail, which shall be considered on its own merit having regard to the facts/materials brought before the Court and shall be disposed of in accordance with law uninfluenced by the present order passed by this Court in the present proceeding. With this observation, the application stands disposed of. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.) 2