HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION NO.199 OF 2007 Date: 21.01.2010 Between: Smt Reddy Narsamma and 4 others ……Petitioners And: The State of A.P., rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another ……Respondents. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION NO.199 OF 2007 ORDER: This petition is filed by the accused Nos.1 to 5 under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing F.I.R in Crime No.221 of 2006 of Ramayampet police station relating to offence under Section 420 I.P.C. The 2nd respondent gave report to the police on 09.12.2006 alleging that A-1 to A-5 played fraud on him and obtained two registered sale deeds dated 29.08.2006 without disclosing contents of those sale deeds and by making false representations about contents of those documents. It is contended by the petitioners’ counsel that false case is foisted by the 2nd respondent after three months of execution of registered sale deeds in favour of the petitioners 1 and 2 with a view to get over the same and with oblique motive. It is further contended that the 2nd respondent himself marked those two registered sale deeds in O.S.No.86 of 1998 of Junior Civil Judge Court, Medak and that the 2nd respondent is playing a double game. Except giving of report and registration of crime, no other event took place in this criminal case. This Court, while exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, cannot decide whether report given by the 2nd respondent is false or true. It is for the police to decide the same after investigation during which the police will examine not only the 2nd respondent, his witnesses but also the petitioners 1 to 5 herein. After investigation, the police will come to the conclusion whether it is a case for filing charge sheet against the petitioners or a case for referring on any ground. This Court of the opinion that it would be premature for the petitioners to approach this Court at this stage. The petitioners are at liberty to approach this Court as and when any further inconvenience occurred to them. In the result, the criminal petition is dismissed. ___________________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU,J Date:21.01.2010. Gk. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION NO.199 OF 2007 Date:21.01.2010. Gk.