Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11571/2008 Date of Decision :28.12 . 2011. Smt. Tulsi Devi Wd/O Late Shri Mohru Ram, r/o Village Talodi P.O Sundla, Tehsil Salooni, District Chamba (HP). ……. …. Applicant Versus 1. State of H.P through Secretary (Revenue) to the Govt. of H.P at Shimla,HP 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. 3. The Senior Deputy Accountant General A&E, Indian Audit and Accountant Deptt. Himachal Pradesh, Shimla. ……………Respondents Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. A.K Vashista Advocate. For the respondent No.1&2: Mr. A.K Bansal, Addl.Advocate General Surinder Singh, J. (Oral): Ld. counsel for the petitioner states that the gratuity as well as the family pension stands released to the petitioner. If however, he is found entitled for ex-gratia, if any , it be also released to her . With these directions, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s) , if any. 28th December, 2011. (Surinder Singh), veena Judge.