FAO No. 710 of 1990 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH FAO No. 710 of 1990 Date of decision January 13, 2011 Harmeet Kaur and others ....... Appellants Versus Punjab State through Secretary Transport, Punjab Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and another ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- None for the appellant. Mr. H. S. Gill, DAG., Punjab for respondent No.1. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?No K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. The appeal is for enhancement of compensation for death of Didar Singh who was aged 44 years. The claimants were widow, three children and the mother. The evidence was that he was running a hotel and was earning Rs.3500/- per month at Mundi Kharar and he was previously running a spare part shop in Delhi and had migrated to Kharar after 1984 riots. The Tribunal took the income at Rs.2500/- per month, having regard to the fact that he was supporting three daughters one of whom was a student in Dayanand Medical College and he was incurring expenses for the hostel and additional expenses to the tune of Rs.3600/- per year. The Tribunal awarded Rs.2,40,000/- by taking multiplier of 12. FAO No. 710 of 1990 2 2. I will take the income at Rs.2500/- per month as determined by the Tribunal but provide for 1/4th deduction and take the contribution to the family at Rs.1875/- and take annual contribution to the family at Rs.22,500/-. I will adopt multiplier of 14 and determine the loss of dependency at Rs.3,15,000/- and provide for an additional sum of Rs.5,000/- for loss of consortium and other sum of Rs.7500/- as loss of love and affection to the three daughters and I will also provide Rs.5,000/- towards loss of estate and Rs.2000/- for funeral expenses. The total amount of compensation that will become payable will be Rs.3,24,500/- and the amount in excess of what has been determined by the Tribunal will also attract interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till the date of payment. The increased amount of compensation shall be distributed equally amongst the widow and the daughters only. 3. The appeal is of the year 1990 and there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. I have examined the case with the assistance of the counsel appearing for the State. Registry is directed to dispatch copy of the order to the appellant, widow of the deceased. 4. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE Jaunary 13, 2011 archana