IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1117 of 2006 Between: 1 S.M.Subhan, S/o.S.Md.Khasim, R/o.D.No.9-129-D, Krishna Nagar, Kurnool. 2 B.V.S.Kiran Kumar, S/o.Subba Rao, R/o.D.No.40-814-10-5, Nehru Nagar, Kurnool, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District, Kurnool. 2 The Circle Inspector of Police, II Town Police Station, Kurnool. 3 The Sub Inspector of Police, II Town Police Station, Kurnool. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.RATHANGA PANI REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioner prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the construction work of the petitioner building situated at Sy.No.180/2, bearing H.No.40-34-A,B,C, Bellary Road, Kurnool Town, Kurnool district to an extent of 600 Sq.Yards without any authority of law and jurisdiction even though petitioners are the absolute owners of the said property and injunction orders are also passed in their favour, only by succumbing to the political pressure as illegal, arbitrary, and in violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the construction work and peaceful possession and enjoyment of the above said property petitioners.” At the hearing, Sri K.Rathangapani Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as such. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 4th JUNE, 2009. kvni