:1: :1: :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2150 OF 1999 Shri Sahadev Bondraji Wankhade & Others .. Petitioners. Vs. M/s.Jayashree Suraksha Rakshak Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.Nitin P.Deshpande for the petitioners. ‘ Mr.K.P.Anilkumar for respondent no.2. Mr.T.C.Kaushik for respondent no.3. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATED : MARCH 09, 2006. DATED : MARCH 09, 2006. DATED : MARCH 09, 2006. P.C: . In view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Steel Authority of India Ltd. Steel Authority of India Ltd. Steel Authority of India Ltd. & Others Vs. National Union Water Front Workers & & Others Vs. National Union Water Front Workers & & Others Vs. National Union Water Front Workers & Others 2001 III CLR 349 Others 2001 III CLR 349 Others 2001 III CLR 349 the relief prayed for in this petition cannot be entertained and the petitioners’ will have to approach to the office of the Deputy Labour Commissioner for reference to be made under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. 2. The petition is, therefore, dismissed with liberty to the petitioners’ or their union to :2: :2: :2: approach the Deputy Labour Commissioner for a reference to decide the employer and employee relationship. Needless to mention that the petitioners shall be entitled for all statutory benefits under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)