IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-10372 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:20.07.2011 Rajinder Singh . . .Petitioner Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Ms.Divya Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sagar Deswal, AAG, Haryana. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This is a petition for bail in a pending trial case registered vide FIR No.903 dated 07.10.2010 under Sections 148, 149 & 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) at Police Station Karnal City, Karnal. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that no role is attributed to the petitioner in the alleged crime. She further submits that Arun (deceased) was a bystander, who has been killed by Rakesh. She has admitted that the petitioner was though present but did not participate in anything. This fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the State on instructions received from ASI Rishi Raj. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 7.10.2010 and out of 21 witnesses only one witness has been examined so far. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case but without making any observations on merit, petitioner is directed to be admitted to bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JULY 20, 2011 JUDGE Vivek