IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 1015 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO. 1015 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO. 1015 OF 2009 Anand Raghu Jadhav. ... Petitioner. V/s. Smt.Sindhutai Shriram Medhi (since deceased through her legal heirs) Shri Mukund Shriram Medhi & Anr. ... Respondents. S.M.Kamble for the petitioner. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 5th February 2009. DATED: 5th February 2009. DATED: 5th February 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused record. 2. Having seen the impugned order passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal and having seen the view taken therein, no fault can be found with the said view which is based on the provisions of the Tenancy Act. The findings recorded are based on material on record. The view taken is a reasonable and possible view. No perversity or arbitrariness is demonstrated by the petitioner. Petition is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)