IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 7824 of 2006 Between: K.V. Ramesh Chowdary S/o. Late Sri Venkaiah St. Mary's Centenary Junior College, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Hyderabad Archdiocese Educational Society, Rep. by its Arch Bishop and Chairman Archbishop's 2 Vice Chairman, Hyderabad Archdiocese Educational Society, Sardar Patel Road, Secunderabad-500 003. 3 Secretary, Hyderabad Archdiocese Educational Society, Sardar Patel Road, Secunderabad-500 003. 4 Correspondent & Principal, St. Mary's Centenary Junior College, St. Francis Street, Secunderabad-500 003. 5 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Board of Intermediate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of MANDAMUS declaring the impugned proceedings RC No. HAES/JC/2005-2006 dt. 8-2-2006 of the respondent-management as arbitrary, illegal, and contrary to law and by nullifying the same direct my continuance in the Organization with all consequential and attendant benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner: DR.P.B.VIJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: KUM.C.SINDHU KUMARI The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No. 7824 OF 2006 O R D E R: This writ petition is ﬁled being aggrieved by the proceedings Rc.No.HAES/JC/2005-2006 dated 8.2.2006 of the respondent – management, whereunder the services of the petitioner were retrenched. There is no necessity of going into all the details. Suﬃce it to note, the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that during the pendency of the writ petition the impugned order was withdrawn and thereafter a minor punishment of reduction in pay- scale was imposed against the petitioner and aggrieved thereby, the petitioner had ﬁled W.P. 20641 of 2006 before this Court. Hence, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition. It is accordingly dismissed. C.V. RAMULU, J. Date: 19-09-2008. MVB.