IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No.7965 of 2009 Date of decision: 22.7.2009 Jeeta Singh. -----Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab & others. -----Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Dheeraj Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suvir Sehgal, Addl.A.G., Punjab for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Charanjit Singh Bakshi, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 and 4. Mr. H.S. Bhinder, Advocate for respondent No.5. ----- ORDER: 1. This petition seeks quashing of the order of termination of contract dated 8.4.2009, Annexure P-7. 2. The reasons given in the order, inter-alia, are that the petitioner had two names Jeeta Singh and Surjit Singh. In the Voters List, his name is Surjit Singh while in the contract it is jeeta Singh. Another reason given is that he failed to report within 48 CWP No.7965 of 2009 hours to perform work and as per Tender conditions, he was in default and therefore, the contract was terminated. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner was using the name of Jeeta Singh only, though in the Voters List, his name was Surjit Singh and by doing so, he did not commit any wrong. He also says that he reported within 48 hours and performed the work, which is clear from the slip, Annexure P-10. 4. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4, on instructions from Gurdeep Singh, Inspector, present in Court, says that the slip purported to have been signed by Gurdeep Singh, was not signed by him. There is, thus, disputed question whether the petitioner reported within 48 hours or not. 5. We do not consider it appropriate to go into this disputed question of fact in writ jurisdiction. 6. The petition is dismissed, without prejudice to any other remedy in accordance with law. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE July 22, 2009 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) ashwani JUDGE 2