HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR CR.M.P.(PR) No.3995/2009 ^^) ? ^j^ ^ APPLICANTS VBRSUS RBSPONDBNTS Saat Kumar Shukla S/o Ramdayal shukla, aged about 63 years, occupation service Shyaoia Shukla w/o Saat Kumar Shukla, aged about 63 years Udbhat Shukla @ BuHu S/o Saat Kumar Shukla, aged about 26 years AU of R/o Kachahadpara, BaUkunthpur, P.S. Baikunfhpur, District Korea (CG) State of Chhattisgarh, Through The CoUector, Korea, Distdct Korrea (CG) APPLICATION V]S4S20FCR.P.C.FQRT^STORATiaN QP CMMINAL REVI8ION N0. 6W/&007 Appearaace: Shri Saurabh Dao.gi, counsel for fhe petitioner. Ms, Madhunisha Singh, Paael Lawyer for fhe State. Divisioa Beiicli:- Hoa'ble Shri T.P. Sharma fis Hon?ble Shri R.L.Jhanwar.JJ Per T.P.Sfaarma, J. ORAL ORDBR (14.2.2011) Registr)^ has poiated out default. Learaed counsel for fhe petitioner submits that he has filed aii appUcation for condonation of delay in filing fhe revision vide I.A.No.l. Heard on I.A,No. 1, appUeation for condonation ofdelay. The rcvision has been fHed after 26 days ofits Imiitation, On due consideration, we are satisfied fhat ftie petitioner has beeu able to explaia fhe delay ia filmg the revision. Consequenfly, I,A.No. 1 is allowed, Delay ia filiiig fhe revision is hereby condoned. Also heard on fhe appUcation for restoration filed under Section 482 ofthe Code ofCrimmal Procedure. Leanied counsel for the petitioner submits fh.at the admitted crimiaal revisiou No.607/2007 has been dismissed vide order dated 30.6.2009 for waat of prosecution. He submits that the petitiouer was haviag sufficient cause for not appearmg to prosecute fhe revision. On the otlier haad, leamed counsel for the State opposed fhe petition, On due consideration, the petitiou j51ed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed. Crimmal Revision No.607/2007 dismissed for waat of prosecution vide order dated 30.6.2009 is hereby restored to its original uuinber. Sd/- T.P. Shanna Judge Sd/- R.L. Jhanwar Judge