C.R.No.7117 of 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.7117 of 2008 Date of decision : 22.12.2008 Jarnail Singh ...Petitioner Versus Manjit Singh and another ......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER ..... Present : Mr.Vikas Cuccria, Advocate for the petitioner. MAHESH GROVER, J.(Oral) After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of the impugned order dated 10.11.2008, I am of the opinion that there is no merit in the revision petition which deserves to be dismissed. The learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that he is in possession on the basis of the lease deed and prior to this his predecessor-in-interest was in possession on the basis of a lease deed and after his death the petitioner is said to have entered in the possession. However, there is no material on record to fortify the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner. The impugned order shows that the lease deed expired in the year 1996-97 and no amount was paid to the respondents thereafter implying thereby that the petitioner is in unauthorised possession of the suit property. No C.R.No.7117 of 2008 -2- other material has been shown to this Court which could persuade this court to take a view contrary to the one which has been expressed in the impugned order. Dismissed. 22.12.2008 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss