IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18516 of 2011 SURENDRA PASWAN & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 14.6.2011 Heard. The learned Sessions judge, Gaya was issuing the following directions to the petitioners as also to the court below : “So far anticipatory bail petition of petitioner nos. 1 to 3, namely, Surendra Paswan, Musaheb Paswan and Kunti Devi is concerned, Surendra Paswan is the husband of the informant and Musaheb Paswan and Kunti Devi are parents in laws of the informant and there is direct allegation against them regarding torture on the informant. But, since all the three petitioners are ready to keep the informant Karmi Devi with them at her Sasural with full dignity and honour, hence, all the above named petitioners are directed to surrender before the court bail and pray for regular bail and to execute bond in the lower court that they are ready to keep the informant with full dignity and honour and will never demand anything from her in future and will not torture her and if such bond is filed, in presence of the complainant and her lawyer, the lower court will consider their prayer for bail. With this observation, the prayer of anticipatory bail of these petitioners 1 to 3 is hereby rejected.” On perusal of the above direction, what appears is that this petition was out and out frivolous never required to be filed before this Court. The learned Sessions Judge himself issued order of admission of petitioners to bail on certain conditions. The petition is dismissed. The petitioners should surrender 2 and abide by the directions of the learned Sessions Judge in the impugned order. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)