t^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S} No. 1938 of 2008 Petitioner Versus Respondents 1. Ram Kumar Verma. S/o Shri Amolj Ram Verma. Age about 46 years, head Master, Govt. Primary School. Panchbhaiya, Btock- Bemetera, Distt. -• Durg (C.G.) State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Education & Tribal Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur. (C.G.) District Education Officer, Bemetara, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETIT01N UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Singte Bench : Hon'bje Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Ajay Shrivastava. Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Smitha Ghai, Panel Lawyerforthe respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on this 1 day of April, 2CK)8) The petitioner was appointed jnitially, on a fixed pay of Rs. 150/-. The petttioner was thereafter, granted regular pay scate on completion of the probation period. The question of law involved herein is, asto whether the petitioner js entttled to regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of initiaj appointment or from the date ofcompjetion ofprobation period. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. as well as learned counsel appearing for the responctents/State, jointly submit that the facts and question of law, involved in the present writ petition, are the same asto that of in W. P. (S) No. 3566^007 (Loknath Patel Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others), whteh was altowed vide orderdated 27.6.2007. '"^^^y Thakur 4. In view of the above-stated submjssions made by teamed counsel appearing for ?he parties, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. petitioner is entitted for regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initiat appointment, subject to verEfication of the facts. No order asto costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge