IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1798 of 2006 RANA RANG BAHADUR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 04.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The reason why the petitioner approached this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was because according to him an action taken against him for cancellation was without any notice or opportunity of hearing. This statement of the petitioner does not seem to be entirely correct, if what has been brought on record in the counter affidavit is accepted. However, irrespective of the two divergent positions, in the interest of justice, the matter is remanded back to the licensing authority that he shall give an opportunity of hearing on the petitioner appearing before him within one month and filing a show cause from today and he shall pass a fresh order in this regard after hearing the petitioner. The impugned order brought on record contained in Annexure – B to the counter affidavit stands quashed. The writ application is allowed. Rajeev/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)