IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETHDAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 7548 of 2003 Between: Davuluri Malyadri s/o Ramaiah R/o Vippagunta, Ponnaluru Mandal., Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Secretary Ministry of Rural Development N.B.O. Building, G. Wing, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi 2 Prl.Secretary Rural Development Department Government of A.P. Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad 3 Executive Director Drought Prone Area Programme Prakasam District 4 Project Director District Rural Development Agency Ongole, Prakasam District 5 The Mandal Parishad Development Officer., Ponnalur Mandal Prakasam District 6 Ghattamaneni Ademma R/o. Vippagunta, Ponnalur Mandal, Prakasam District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in not considering the representation dated 15-4-2003 submitted by the petitioner and others for formation of watershed association and committee in accordance with guidelines for the village vippagunta is illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and articles 14,19 and 21 of Constitution of India and also the guidelines issued for the development of watershed programme and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 5 to form watershed association and committee for Vippagunta village as per the guidelines issued by the Ist respondent in 1995 and 2001 and see that the watershed programme is implemented in strict terms thereof and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner :MR.SATYANARAYANA NIMMAGADDA Counsel for the Respondents1 to 5: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _____________________ B.Seshasayana Reddy, J. 9th June, 2005 KM ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 Secretary Ministry of Rural Development N.B.O. Building, G. Wing, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi 2 Prl.Secretary Rural Development Department Government of A.P. Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad 3 Executive Director Drought Prone Area Programme Ongole, Prakasam District 4 Project Director District Rural Development Agency Ongole, Prakasam District 5 The Mandal Parishad Development Officer., Ponnalur Mandal Prakasam District 6. 2 CCs to G.P. for Panchayath Raj andRural Development, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad 7. 2 CD copies THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 7548 of 2003 9th June, 2005.