IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34725 of 2011 1. Imam Ali, son of Late Wasir Ansari. 2. Usman Ansari, son of Late Alijan Ansari. 3. Abdul Laish @ Abu Laish, son of Naim Ansari. 4. Asgar Ansari @ Asgar Ali, son of Hafiz Ansari. 5. Seraj Ansari @ Serajul, son of Usman Ansari. 6. Bazul Ansari @ Bazul, son of Usman Ansari. 7. Abdul Rahim @ Budaru, son of Late Liyakat Ansari. 8. Alam Ansari @ Alam, son of Naim Ansari. 9. Jainul Ansari, son of Ismile Ansari. 10. Mainuddin Ansari, son of Gafur Ansari. All resident of Village-Sarkhauli, P.S. Parsauni, District-Sitamarhi. ….Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar. …Opposite Party. Advocate for Petitioners:- Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh. Advocate for the State:- Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, A.P.P. ----------- 2. 11.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. All the ten petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Parsauni P.S. Case No. 59/2011 for the offences under Sections 147/149/447/448/341/323/307/504 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this case after simple assault arising out of land dispute. Submission is that present case has been instituted in retaliation of earlier instituted Parsauni P.S. Case No. 57 of 2011 at the instance of petitioner no. 2. Moreover, informant appears inflicting three simple injuries. There is general and omnibus allegation nothing specific against these petitioners. 2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Parsauni P.S. Case No. 59/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Kamlesh (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)