1 909.11-ao-- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 909 OF 2011 Shri Jaywant Shravan Patil. ... Appellant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and another. ... Respondents. WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 910 OF 2011 Shri Pandurang Narayan Palavkar. ... Appellant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and another. ... Respondents. WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 911 OF 2011 Shri Banubai Kamlakar Bhandari. ... Appellant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and another. ... Respondents. WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 912 OF 2011 Shri Harishchandra Damodar Patil. ... Appellant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and another. ... Respondents. R.D.Suryawanshi for the appellant. H.J.Dedhia, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATED : 22nd September 2011. 2 909.11-ao-- P.C. : Prima facie it appears that the description of the properties given in the plaints and the description of the properties in the photo- passes in the possession of the appellants/ original plaintiffs are not the same. Photo-passes appear to be in relation of the properties having different numbers. Counsel for the appellant submits that it might be a typographical error and the plaintiffs may be permitted to move an application seeking amendment to the plaints with a view to correct description of the properties appearing in the plaint. 2. It is open for the appellants to move appropriate application seeking amendment of the plaint and, if such application is tendered, it would be decided on its own merits in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned. After securing permission for amendment to the pleadings and seeking leave to correct the description of the properties, the appellants/ original plaintiffs may move an application for seeking interim protection. The trial Court is expected to decide such application, if tendered by the plaintiffs, in accordance with law after extending opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned, without being influenced by the observations made by learned trial Judge in the impugned order. 3. So far as instant appeals are concerned, no interference is called for. All the appeals from order stand disposed of. In view disposal of appeals from order, civil applications do not survive and stand disposed of accordingly. (R.M.BORDE, J.)