\‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 2756 01‘20W7 PETITIONER : 1. Chhoteial Dewangan S/o Late Shn' Kala Nath Dewangan, Age about 41 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School Asaunda attached Govt. High School, Asaunda, Ganiyari, Block Tilda, Dim. — Raipur (co) 2. Sagar Ram Dahmiya S/o Late Shri Bhagchand Dahariya Age about 45 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Chingariya, Block — Tilda, Distt. — Raipur (C.G.) 3. Rakesh Kumar Salm S/o Shri Maya Ram Sahu Age about 37 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Farhada, Block. —Tilda, Distt. — Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State Government of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Ofhcer Distt. — Raipur (C.G.) 3. Block Education Ofmer Block — Tilda, Distt. — Raipur (C.G.)> 4. Treasury & Accounts Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON STITUTION OF INDIA. Single Bench : Hon’ hie Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. Present: Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondems. ORDER (Passed on 7m day ofMay, 2007) The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f the date of initial appointment or hem the date of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same as to that of in W.P.(S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil 'l‘iwari and others Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh & Others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.1 1.2006. 3. In View ofthe above-stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihetri Judge