l^ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.p. fsy. 6^6/2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS r^. '"" /••' A^ €^€ ~^y^M ..-•••.^•^y Vishnu Ram Kaushik,son ofShri Battu Ram Kaushik, aged about 56 years, Occupation - Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Haldi, Tahsil Gunderdehi, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.), 2. The Director, Public Instructions Department, Raipur (C.G.), 3. District Education Officer, Durg, District Durg (C.G.), 4. Block Education Officer, Gunder- dehi, District - Durg (C.G.) 5. Treasury & Funds Department, Durg, District Durg'(C.G.). WRIT PETITIONUNDER ARTICLE 2260F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGMIH : BILASPUR WRITPETmONtSl N0.6456 OF 2009 PETITIONER ViShnuRam Kaushik ; Versus RESPONDENTS State of ChtetUs^rh and others 0/Vrit petition under Articles226 of the ConstituBon of Ihdia) Single Bench: Hon'bleShri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: - Shri D. N. Prajapati, counssl for the petiBoner. Shri P. K. Bhaduri, Fanel Lawyerfor the State. ORAL ORDER (Passedon this09n*dayofNovember, 2009) Learned counsel forthe peUUoner, on instructions, sed<s peFmission of this Court to withdrew this petition with liberty to make a representaflon before the respondent authorities. (2) No objectionfromtheothersicle. (3) ltisordered,asprayedfor. (4) Accordingly, liberty. petition is dfsroissed as withdrawn with the aforestated ^ sdl- :. .. SatishK.Agninoin -' '^-Judge:'' - .•^