1appln-3309-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION No. 3309 of 2010 Maru Yallappa Kunchikurve .. Applicant. versus State of Maharashtra M.H.B.Colony, P.S. .. Respondent. Mrs Mallika R. Ingale, for the Applicant. Mr S. N. Gawade, A.P.P.for the State. CORAM:- A.R. JOSHI, J. DATE :- 10TH AUGUST, 2010. P.C.:- 1. Heard rival submissions for some time on this regular bail application preferred by the applicant - accused who is facing charge for the offence punishable under Section 307, 342 read with section 34 of I.P.C. In this case charge-sheet is already filed. 2. Allegedly, on the date of the incident, the present applicant 2appln-3309-10 along with his another associate stabbed the complainant with knife on his abdomen causing deep stab wound on right side of abdomen. The First Information Report was immediately lodged. 3. During the arguments, learned A.P.P.for the State submitted that present applicant is history sheeter and there are almost 28 cases earlier lodged against him and out of them only in one matter he has been acquitted. The list of such antecedents is shown to the Court which show that he is known “Mawali” as per the record and has been externed for two years from Greater Bombay and Thane Districts by order dated 3.5.2008 and that on six occasions he was dealt with for violating said order and for having possession of dangerous weapons. Out of said 28 cases one case is for the offence punishable under Section 307 registered with M.H.B.Colony Police Station and one case is for the offence punishable under Section 392 registered with Borivali Police Station. Other cases are of similar such offences of assault, robberies, etc. 4. Under the above circumstances, considering the antecedents and considering availability or otherwise of the present applicant, it is not in the fitness of situation to release the applicant on bail. In the result, the following order:- 3appln-3309-10 ORDER: (a) Bail application is rejected. (b) Any observations made in this order shall not be construed as any finding or any expression of opinion on the merits of the case at the time of trial. Application is disposed of in above terms. (A.R.JOSHI,J)