IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35040 of 2010 1. SINGARI DEVI W/O SHIV KUMAR SHARMA 2. PUTARI DEVI W/O SUKALU SHARMA 3. SUKALU SHARMA S/O LATE BANARSHI SHARMA, ALL R/O VILLAGE SADA AWATI SAGER PER, P.S. NUAON, DISTRICT-KAIMUR AT BHABUA. --PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY 3 29.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners are named accused in this case being in laws of deceased daughter of the informant. It further appears that on alleged revealing of true facts the parties have entered into compromise. If it is so and the informant, by appearing as witness, supports the factum of compromise and also stood as one of the bailers, the petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua, in Ramgarh (Nuaon) P.S. Case no. 27 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down in 2 Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with the additional condition that the petitioners shall remain present before the court below till disposal of the case. If the petitioners fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad