^— f1:,' ^. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) CIVIL REVISION N0. (/2, OF2008 r2 APPLICANTS 1. ^v ••^ ^PLAINTIFFS 7 \^ ..i^' ^"y\^ ^'y..••""'' '^^'" ShJvKumarYadav Son of Late Shri Jagesar Yadav,aged about 42 years; Chaturgun Son of Shri Ramkhelawan, aged about 50 years; Both Occupation-Agriculturist and resjdent of Village Kanakpur, Police Station Ramanujganj, Tahsil Pal/DistrictSurguja (C.G.). VERSUS •A. NQN-APPLICANTS: ^ Ramchan @ Ramchandra Yadav t>EFENDANTS Son of Shri Jitan Yadav, aged about 35 years; Nand Kumar Son of Shri Jitan Yadav/aged about 30 years; Gopal Son of Shri Nakchhedi, aged about 45 years; Rajesh Singh Son of Shri Rajnandan Singh, aged about 30 yeas; ewz Sunil Kumar Singh Sonof Shri Rajnandan Singh, aged about 25 years; 6. Kanhai Son. of Shri Mahkal, aged about 32 years; \ All resident of Village Kanakpur, Police Station Ramanujganj, Tahsil Pal, District Surguja (C.G.). 7.^ B. P. Yadav Son of Late Shri Ghasi Yadav, aged about 56 years; resident of Chhote Aatargunda, Behind of Panchayat Bhawan Chakradharnagar, District Raigarh (C.G.). CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION lt5 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.1908 -HC-22 31T^T'5FT f<rlJ5b S^t $ti*ii<=r»^rfin ~S^t ^WM^, ^Tll^^Ko, I^^IKiy 3ni^r xpra? ^./t. ^o- /3/ WHCflT W*ITcb M 200?r f^F^ar' 3TT^T'^ITW^ff5^T :-17-12.2009. -; ' ,; Shri V.K, Pandey. courisel | Heard o:n admJssEon. The jnstant" revlslon' 1s : di decree dat@d'26-09-200? 'passec •^F.T.C.), Ramanujganj, Distt. -SUi v&'hereby and whereunder ti appiicants/plaintilfe has been disi 14-03-2005 • passed-by ;Civlt sJud Surguja in CiviJ Suit No.2-B/2002 •;has dlsmlssed the suit of the appli The facts briefly stated are .jAccordjng to • 'th . compiaint before the • Police fcompjaint of the frespondents, t -regjstered' a 'case -under Sections tacjng'; tria!, the appijcanfs wei •Thereafter, the applicatits prefem Rs.14,10G/-; against the respon Leamed Triaj Court on appreciati< ^n-d' su-bmlssjons • made-: by the p agal.nst the appjicants preferred •C dlsmlssed on ments, hen.ce this re Learneti counsel appearin; tliat'the 1-earned both the Courts niEs-appreciatJng the evidence Jed cbMfd^'1 'RTR^f ^ 'fex^ <^i^K ^STpOTCT^T |or'the appilcants. : ;' : . :; I'ecte.ci against .the. ju'dgmenf and by 'First'Addlttohai DjstrJGt'Judge. Iguja in CNi Appea^ KS6.4-A/2005 |e;' appeaf preferred by " the- Inissed oonfirming the order dated ^e, CEass-J, Ramanujganj, District Ers which the learnsd CEvil Judge |;ahts/p!aintlffs. Is^under:''" ' " . • •;" "' ; ^ fespondents' 'have jodged 'a fa:!se S|atibn,: Ramanujganj. • Upon the |ie poitce olTIcer at Ramanujganj |341 &506^> ofthe I.P.C. After je acquitted by the trial Court. |d a sulticlalming compensation of pents for maiidous • prosecution. |n of evidence ied, materia! pjaced tirtles, dismissed the- 'suiti There' first •which -has-ateo b^en. :|/jsion. • • • ..-' .. • .: ' \ I for the appli'cants would submlt |»e!ow have djsmJssed their suit 'by |n th@ case. \ 1 -HC-22 STT^T^RT {<rlJ5h $b*iicr» 1y(^a Kvr "3'^r ^ll^lH^, ^Tll<l<l<o, facnKiy 3fli[9T 'q=W HW<ni 9b*<l<sh ^^l NO-^.^/ __ ^....:..^....^^..........^,^ ^ ^ "f^^T" ; 3TT^T'^ITW^f?H a|s I have iearned count ths -judgment and decree impug| Courts beiow. :- : :• : .. • •.I • The- learned-Cou-rt b-elow after appreeiating the evidence plaJntiffs- falEed' to- prove- that the-^ respondents wlth some uEterior rrt that the. appiicants- were •acqyitte| Thsrefore, it cannot be said tht commltted any jurisdiGtlonai ^iJiet .jydgment. .: : . -' • .. in view of the above, the jjable tp.be and is hereby dlsmi'sse^ cbNid^l'1 *ii^<viT'?fex3t ^^K ^srf^R^TT^T le! for the appiicants and perused ^ed and the records of both the wel! as the first Appeilafe Coyrt EecS, recprded a fSntling that the iaid compiaint was todged by the Dtive-ancl a!so recorded a flnding. {• on-account of benefit of doubt. at^ both : the Courts- below have gality •in" -the' • 'evision belng :devoid of merlts; is ..at admissjon:stage. Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge ffi