IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15151 of 2010 SHASHIKANT RAI, SON OF BINDESHWAR RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11/05/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 356 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Considering that for misuse of privilege of bail for a period of eight years, the petitioner has remained in custody since 14.10.2009, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-IIIrd, Barh, in Sessions Trial No. 1558 of 2009 arising out of Barh P.S. Case No. 324 of 1994 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the brother of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented - 2 - on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)