AB 530/2011 BEFORE HON\BLE MR JUSTICE C R SARMA Heard Mr. SC Biswas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard M r. BB Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. By this application under section 438 of the Cr.P.C the petitioner namely, Asha Nath has prayed for pre-arrest bail in connection with Bongaigaon Police Statio n Case No. 475 of 2010 under sections 120(B)/420/406/201 of the Indian Penal Co de. Perused the case diary. This is the second bail application filed by the petitioner. Earlier this Court by order dated 15.11.2010, after perusing the case diary, rejected the prayer fo r bail. This Court earlier observed it cannot be said that there is no necessa ry of custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required in connection with t he aforesaid . In view of the above, I find no sufficient reasons to extend the benefit of pre- arrest bail in favour of the petitioner. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Return the case diary. The anticipatory bail application is disposed of.