IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.1239 of 2010 Date of Order: 7.4.2011 Gurnam and others .....Petitioners Vs. Vinod Kumar and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr. Sandeep Ahuja, Advocate for Mr. A.S. Kalra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. R.K. Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.1-plaintiff. Mr. B.S. Jaswal, Advocate for respondent No.2. JASWANT SINGH, J (ORAL) By filing the instant revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution, defendant Nos.2 to 4/petitioners have prayed for setting aside the order dated 10.12.2009 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Kaithal whereby their evidence in a suit for specific performance filed by the plaintiff-respondent No.1 was closed. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are in agreement stating that the present revision petition has become infructuous as the suit itself has since been decided on 14.3.2011. In view of the statement by learned counsel for the parties, present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. April 07, 2011 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manoj JUDGE