THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CONTEMPT CASE No.483 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: On 07.04.2010 when the matter was called, as the learned counsel for the petitioner was absent, the matter was directed to be listed on 08.04.2010 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. On 08.04.2010 Notice before Admission was ordered and the counsel for the petitioner was also permitted to take out personal notice to the respondents with a direction to file proof of service within a period of four weeks. Again on 12.11.2010 and 26.11.2010 when the matter was listed, the counsel for the petitioner was absent and the matter was adjourned by two weeks. Even today also when the matter is taken up for hearing, the counsel for the petitioner is absent and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence this court is of the view that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the matter. Hence, this Contempt Case is dismissed. --------------- 10.12.2010 Kvsn