IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2178 of 2011 LADDU MAHTO & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR -------- 2 04.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners seek their bail in connection with Ghoswari P. S. Case no. 45/2010 registered under sections 302, 201 and 120B/34 of the IPC. Admittedly, petitioner no.1 is father, petitioner no.2 is elder brother and petitioner no.3 is younger brother of the deceased and it is stated that the aforesaid petitioners committed murder of the deceased on account of some petty family feud. Admittedly, informant has not seen the actual killing of the deceased and the entire case hinges upon circumstantial evidence. Furthermore, it appears from perusal of the impugned order that the Investigating Officer has collected only material to show involvement of petitioners in the alleged crime that they were seen in the company of the deceased prior to the alleged occurrence. Moreover, in trial informant has already been declared hostile by the prosecution. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let petitioners, Laddu Mahto, Ram Chandra Mahto and Shree Kant Mahto be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge V, Barh Dist. Patna in Sessions Trial no. 1741/2010 arising out of Ghoswari - 2 - P.S. Case no. 45 of 2010. Shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)