IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.15413 of 2011 Date of Decision.23.08.2011 Sanjeev Kumar son of Sh. Milkh Raj, Sole Proprietor of M/s Milkh Raj Sanjeev Kumar, Commission Agents, Shop No.81, New Grain Market Fazilka, r/o Arya Samaj Road, Fazilka, Distt. Fazilka .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through its Secretary, Punjab Mandikaran Board, Mini Secretariat, Punjab, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Rajesh Narang, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner comes through writ petition to challenge a notice issued by the District Mandi Officer to come present on 26.08.2011 on the ground that the complaint on which notice is issued is frivolous and there has been already a settlement between the petitioner and the complainant before the Lok Adalat and the complaint given by him itself is not appropriate. On a query put to counsel for the petitioner whether the Mandi Officer has power to call for accounts and to inspect the same, he says that such a power exists but it is exercised unreasonably in a case where the complainant has lodged a frivolous complaint. The pre-decisional notice cannot be a ground for intervention through a writ petition. 2. The writ petition is premature and it is dismissed. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE August 23, 2011 Pankaj*