IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14938 of 2007 1. RAJESH KUMAR, S/O SHRI RAJDEO SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-RUPAPUR, P.O.- NAGALA KINJAR, P.S.- PALIGANJ, DISTRICT-PATNA. 2. RAM KUMAR SINGH, S/O SHRI DEVCHAND SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-SADURA, P.S.-SIKARIA, P.S.- PALIGANJ, DISTRICT-PATNA. 3. GANESH SHANKER VIDYARTHI, S/O SARYOU PANDIT, R/O VILLAGE-SAMDA, P.O.-DAHIA, P.S.- SIGORI, DISTRICT-PATNA. 4. ANAND PRAKASH, S/O RAJDEO PRASAD, R/O VILLAGE-MILKI, P.O.-ACHHUA, P.S.-PALIGANJ, DISTRICT-PATNA. 5. RAMASHRAY PRASAD, S/O RAMDENI PRASAD SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-NIGHARA, P.O. AND P.S.- SIGORI, DISTRICT-PATNA. 6. MAHENDRA GUPTA, S/O LATE CHATURI SAO, R/O VILLAGE-BANAULI BAGURAG, P.O.-BENAULI, P.S.- PALIGANJ, DISTRICT-PATNA. 7. MADHUSUDAN KUMAR, S/O SHRI RADHESHYAM SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-SAHOSH, P.O.-SAHOSH, P.S.- SIGORI, DISTRICT-PATNA. 8. GITENDRA KUMAR, S/O SRI MANDEO RAM, R/O VILLAGE-BALIPUR, P.O.-CHIKASHI, P.S.-SIGORI, DISTRICT-PATNA. 9. RITA KUMARI, W/O DHARMENDRA YADAV, R/O VILLAGE-CHIKASHI, P.O.-CHIKASHI, P.S.-SIGORI, DISTRICT-PATNA. 10.RAJEEV RANJAN KUMAR, S/O RAJ KUMAR YADAV, R/O VILLAGE-DIHPALI, P.O. AND P.S.-PALIGANJ, DISTRICT-PATNA. 11.UMESH PRASAD, S/O CHANDRADEO PRASAD, R/O VILLAGE-BASANT BIGAHA, P.O.-DAHIA, P.S.- PALIGANJ, DISTRICT-PATNA. ………………PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PATNA. 5. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, PATNA. …………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 17.02.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievances of the petitioner 2 nos. 1 to 10 stand redressed and, therefore, he does not want to press this application. He seeks permission to withdraw this application so far as petitioner nos. 1 to 10 are concerned. For petitioner no. 11 he seeks permission to move the appellate authority. In the circumstances, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn so far as petitioner nos. 1 to 10 are concerned. So far as petitioner no. 11 is concerned, this writ application is disposed of with liberty to him to file an appropriate application before the concerned Appellate Authority, if not already filed, for redressal of his grievance. In case such an application is filed by the petitioner, the Appellate Authority shall consider the same and all documents enclosed, including orders of this Court in identical matters, if produced therewith, and make all endeavours to dispose of the same on its own merits after hearing the parties concerned by a speaking order preferably within the time prescribed under the Rules for the purpose without going into the question of limitation. 3 It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioner. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)