IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13707 of 2010 Raj Kumar Vs. State of Haryana & others Present: Mr.Ramesh Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sunil Nehra, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner is a blind and has filed this writ petition being aggrieved against his transfer. Though notice of motion was not issued, but still the respondents have chosen to file written statement. It is admitted that the petitioner is blind. However, it is pointed out that the Director Secondary Education, Haryana visited the school on 26.7.2010 and found that it was not being properly controlled because of the handicap suffered by the petitioner. The students strength in this school is stated to be much more and it is stated that to have better administrative control in the school, the petitioner has been transferred to a place, which is about 10 Kms. from Rohtak, where strength is less. I do not see any reason to doubt the grounds of transfer as disclosed in the reply. The counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that there are some posts available at Rohtak and the petitioner may be adjusted at Rohtak because of his handicap. Let the Director Secondary Education, Haryana consider this request of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. The Director may make an attempt to adjust the petitioner at Rohtak if any post is available where he can be adjusted. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. August 12, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE