1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1475 OF 2009 Vijaykumar Bansilal Sharma .. petitioners Versus The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Branch Parbhani through its Manager. .. Respondent. --- Mr. A.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. S.M. Godesay, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 8th July, 2009. ORAL ORDER :- 1] By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 34d October, 2008 vide which the application filed by the present petitioner for production of secondary evidence came to be rejected. 2 2] The learned trial court, while rejecting the application has specifically observed that, " The plaintiff has not specifically stated which documents he wants to prove by secondary evidence and which were original documents submitted to the defendant Nos. 3 and 4. In short, the application below Exhibit 109 is vague and on the basis of vague averment in the application, permission to lead secondary evidence cannot be granted. The plaintiff has to state each and every document and about it's custody for seeking permission for secondary evidence." 3] Perusal of the application filed by the present petitioner which is at Page 135 of the paper book,would reveal that there is substance in the observations of the learned trial court. In that view of the matter, no perversity could be found in the approach adopted so as to warrant interference. Hence, writ petition is summarily rejected. [B.R. GAVAI,J.] Grt/-