C9 gingle Bench g Qfkm/\ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETn-romsmo. 3W3 /2009 Maheffar Lal Diwakar, S/o. Sudhemm Diwukar, Aged about 58 years, R/o. Behind Telecom Office Shankar Nagar, P.0. Simga, Tahsil Simga, District Raipm‘ (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS / RESPONDENTS 1. SttHe of Chhaf'risgarh, Through fhe Secretary, Department of Revenue a Disaster Management, D.K.S. Bhawah, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3.“ The Sub Divisional Officer, Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) / Ta 7W Wk c, my, .\A?Cs)b$q3%# my, m m {Wm W?w€hr7w . I mWam fgqhfm-{rz fmémam : HGEQ"H:LE $E-ZRE £§f$"‘ECE BRET @EEIER DEWAKER Q72§£§§ Shri Anand Kumar Tiwe ri. counse1 for the Detitianer. Shri Sumesa Baja', GA for the Stats. Chaiienge in ths pz‘e§ent petition i$ t0 the order dated 3006/2009 passed by the res‘ pendent N02 by which the petitioner who is working as Patwari ha‘s been transferred- from Patwari Haika No, 10 D itakheda, Tahsil Sm ga, district Raiuur to Abhanpur, Dist-t. Raipue Contention of counsel I" 1‘ the petitioner is that [h wife of the petitioner ie suffering from ser ous ailment (heart diseaee) and to thi exect the petitioner has air éitc'ly made a representation (Annexure P/ 4‘}. He submits th t directim may be issued ts the respondent No.22 for deciding the representation exneditious‘w. Counsei for the State contends that he has no obiection i i i‘ representation of the petitionef is decided. He further submits that iet the petitioner make a fresh reoresentation to the responc‘ient No2 and that wou‘id be decided strictiy in accordance with iaw. Accordingly} the netition is disnosed of with a direction to t oetitioner to make reoresentation afresh Within a‘ neriod of ten days irom the receiot of the copy of this order and the same wouid be r decided strictly in accordance with law preferabiv Within a oeriod of three weeks from the date of its receiot. it is made gear 1 u tna‘t t tnis i Lourt x has not exeressed‘ any opinion on merits of the ease and the authority wouid be at liberty to decide the appeal on its own nie ‘its, t r Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge i i e