IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 534 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.07.2011 Sunita ..Appellant Versus State of Haryana and another ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH, Present : Mr. S.N.Pillania, Advocate, for the appellant. 1. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** M.M.KUMAR, .J. 1. The learned Single Judge has recorded a categorical finding that the Experience Certificate produced by the appellant would be invalid. The obvious reason for the aforesaid conclusion was that no salary was paid to the appellant in respect of the period she has claimed experience. The respondent-department also held an enquiry in respect of the Experience Certificate (Annexure R-1). The name of the appellant figures at Sr. No. 5 and it shows that there was no record available in Kharab Hospital regarding the employment of the appellant or payment of any salary to her. Therefore, so called experience certificate has to be discarded. Without availability of Experience Certificate the appellant would not be eligible. Accordingly, the learned Single Judge has taken the view that she could not be given appointment. LPA No. 534 of 2011 (O&M) [2] 2. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant we are of the considered view that there is no room to interfere in the opinion expressed by the learned Single Judge. The Experience Certificate produced by the appellant is not authentic and the same could not be verified. Such a candidate would even otherwise loose entitlement of hearing on the merit of her case because it is over reaching. The appeal is wholly without any merit and the same is hereby dismissed. (M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE (GURDEV SINGH) 29.07.2011 JUDGE 'ravinder'