BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Thirteenth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13704 of 2011 1 SUBRAMANI 2 VEERACHAMY ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED 5 & 6 Vs THE STATE REP. BY ITS THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALLIMANDAYAM POLICE STATION, OTTANCHATHIRAM TALUK, DINDIGUL DISTRICT CR NO. 235/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. VEERA KATHIRAVAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- All the accused belong to the rival party, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police, for offences under Sections 147, 148, 324, 427 and 506(ii) IPC and Section 3(1) of Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damage and loss) Act 1992 in Crime no.235 of 2011, have come up with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of prosecution, due to political motive, the petitioners caused damage to the properties and caused simple injuries. 3. It is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the case has been falsely foisted and the petitioners are innocent persons and due to political motive, the petitioners have been falsely implicated. 5. Having regard to the nature of allegations and having regard to the fact that the injured has been discharged and all the attending circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ottanchathram, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. sd/- 13/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, OTTANCHATHRAM. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALLIMANDAYAM POLICE STATION, OTTANCHATHIRAM TALUK, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. VEERA KATHIRAVAN Advocate SR.No.35503 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13704 of 2011 Date :13/10/2011 RJ/14.10.2011 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/