IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 4199 of 2011 Date of decision: 13.7.2011 State of Punjab … Petitioner versus H.S.Chahal … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. B.S.Sra, Addl. AG Punjab, for the petitioner-State of Punjab ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present revision is by the State of Punjab against order dated 2.4.2011 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chandigarh, whereby warrants of attachment have been issued against the petitioner-State-judgment-debtor while observing that an amount of Rs.21 lacs is outstanding against the JD-State. State counsel appearing on behalf of the State of Punjab has contended that as a matter of fact, excess payment has been made to the decree-holder and rather recovery is to be effected from the decree-holder. It is stated that correct calculations were submitted by the State-JD before the Court below but the same have no where been discussed by the executing Court in the impugned order. Heard. From the perusal of the impugned order and the record of the case, it transpires that the stand taken by the judgment-debtor/State is correct. The executing Court has not even made a mention of the calculations so submitted by the judgment-debtor/State in its impugned order. In this back-drop of the facts, the impugned order is set aside and the case is remitted back to the Executing Court to decide the matter afresh after C.R. No. 4199 of 2011 -2- taking fresh calculations from the parties. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. July 13, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE