@ V _§IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAS?UR S : H . B. ON’BLE MR. SA 'ISH K. AGNIHOTRI J. WRIT R£TIT10N (give. 4902 ginggg ‘ PETITIONER Sim; Monika Gyanik, rage 36, w/o Shri Atish Gyanik, Assistant Teacher, Primary School Ka. Chamha Coliiery, Development Biock Baikunthpur, Distric: — Koria (C.G.) ‘ VERSUS RESPONDENTS L State of Chhattisgarh, through ~ Principal ' Secretary School Education Dopaltment/ Mantralaya, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2‘ District Eduoation Offkor, District —~ Koria —~ (CG) Present; Shn‘ Rakesh Anthony, Advocate for the petitjomr, Sm‘r. Anju Abuja, Deputy Government Advocate for the State/respondents: . ORDER (Passed on 19a; March 2007) The petitioneri while working as Assistant Teacher at‘Primary Sohooi, ka, Charcha. Cogieryg Deveiopment Bkook Baikumhpura was tmasferi‘ed to Primary Sohool Jagatp‘ur, on the same terms ’ and conditions vjde impugned order dated 1109.200] (Amoexme A/l ) The Madhya PradeSh Administrative Tribunal at Rajput'vide mteiim order dated 12:3 i i200} diroctoé to maimain status quo in , I as was prevaiiiag on f regard to tho position of the petitioner ft ,V - s ' i ,- 7» >7 af‘éeigwuwk 7M,“ ,7 ft 11.,10,2001. By virtue of The iriterim order m6 petitioner is continuing at the; origiilal piacé ofposting, Be that as it mayj with the passage of time this petition has bemma infructuous a5 mriad of transfer is not applicable foiever! ’At this point 0f tima, thcare is no qu€stion to examing tha vaiiiiity (if thé transfer (Eda, However, the rcspondems are at Iiberty to. pa$s appropiiata order keeping in View the pubiic Vimerast and administrativa. exigency, without insisting on VcOmpiiance ofthe impugned transfer order. It is well settled prineipie of law that transfer is an. ineident of ervice and it is fer the employer to decide as to where a particular offieer/employee be postedt keeping in View public interest vats well as administrative exigency, This Court has limited jurisdiction to interfere in the transfer matter and this Court can interfere oniv in'the ease of proved maiaiiciea non- eompetenee of authority passing the transfer order and transfer order not being in conformity with the rules and regulations. In View of the above; this petition stands disposed of, No order as IO COSt. S Sd/- _ . Satish K. Agnihotri 3"; Judge Ll? pm‘ s