IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2223 of 2010 MAHESH PRASAD VERMA SON OF LATE RAM NARAIN PRASAD RESIDENT OF MOHALLA LAXMIPUR, SISWANDHALA, P.S. SIWAN TOWN, DISTRICT - SIWAN Versus 1. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA THROUGH EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (EAST ZONE) 10-A, MIDDILTON ROW KOLKATA, WEST BENGAL. 2. MANAGING DIRECTOR, FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, HEAD QUARTER, 12 KHAMBHA LANE , NEW DELHI, 3. GENERAL MANAGER, FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA (BIHAR REGION) ARUNACHAL BUILDING, 4TH FLOOR, EXHIBITION ROAD, PATNA. 4. AREA MANAGER, FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA SRI NANDAN PATH, CHAPRA, SARAN. ----------- 02. 09.02.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and Mr. P.K. Verma appearing on behalf of the respondent – Corporation. The grievance of the petitioner is that though the pension of the petitioner has been fixed as would be evident from the letter dated 29th of March 2008 as contained in Annexure-6, however, while fixing the pension, the increments allowed to the petitioner were not taken into consideration as such, petitioner is not receiving the correct and full amount of pension as such it is submitted that the pension of the petitioner is required to be revised. Mr. P.K. Verma learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent – Corporation submits that the pension of the petitioner has been fixed by the concerned 2 Ministry, Government of India and as such if any representation is filed, the same shall be forwarded to the concerned Minsitry for its consideration. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 2, for sending it to the appropriate Ministry for redressal of his grievance. In such view of the matter, in case such representation giving specific claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents in support of the claim, the respondent no. 2 shall forwarded the same to the concerned authority for its due consideration in accordance with law. It is expected that the concerned authority on receipt of such representation shall consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)