1 cam-309.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 309 OF 2010 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST.) NO. 27864 OF 2010 Sonal Hemendra Patel. ... Applicant. V/s. Hemendra Ganeshbhai Patel. ... Respondent. Jayprakash J. Saxena with Narayan B. Suvarna i/b. S.Phatak & Co. for the applicant. Vagish Mishra i/b. Bhandary & Bhandary for the respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATED : 11th January 2011. P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the rival parties. Perused civil application and appeal. 2. By this application, the appellant- wife is seeking condonation of delay in filing appeal. This application is opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent- husband contending that no sufficient cause is shown. Reliance placed by learned counsel for the 2 cam-309.10 respondent on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of P.K.Ramachandran v. State of Kerala, AIR 1998 SC 2276, requires the Court to record its satisfaction in the event of inordinate delay. Having gone through the reasons given, we are satisfied that sufficient cause is shown and, consequently, the case for condonation of delay is made out. The reasons stated in the civil application supported by affidavit are sufficient to condone delay. 3. The appeal filed by the respondent- husband is already on board. In that view of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice to hear both appeals together. 4. Thus, having recorded our satisfaction, the delay in filing appeal is condoned. Registry is directed to register appeal and place it along with connected appeal for admission. 5. Civil application is disposed of in terms of this order with no order as to costs. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)