1 wp2098.10 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2098 OF 2010 Nathyaba Dagadu Bodre ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra ....Respondents Mr.Murtaza Najmi, advocate for petitioner. Mr. A.S.Gadkari, APP for State. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND U.D.SALVI, JJ DATED:- SEPTEMBER 1, 2010 P.C. 1. This Petition is filed through jail. Heard Counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned APP. In substance, the relief claimed in the Petition is that the Criminal action be initiated against the concerned police officials, who were involved in the investigation and trial of criminal case against the Petitioner. It is noticed that the Petitioner has been convicted for the offence punishable under section 489(B)(C) read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The fact that the prosecution did not eventually examine all the 22 witnesses named in the charge sheet does not mean that unfair investigation was conducted against the 2 wp2098.10 Petitioner. That by itself can be no basis to assume that the police officials have had any grudge against the Petitioner or falsely implicated the Petitioner. The evidence produced by the prosecution has found favour with the trial Court for convicting to the Petitioner for the alleged offence. In our opinion, this Petition is ill-advised. The same is dismissed. 2. The Court appreciates the assistance given by the Advocate appearing for the Petitioner as amicus curiae to espouse the cause of the Petitioner. 3. Copy of this order be forwarded to the Petitioner, who is in jail. (U.D.SALVI, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)