wRxT H; TxTION No:_'_7_1l / OF 1996 PETITIOMMS: (1) Vijay Vumar S/o Lt. Phoolchand aoea 34 7 wears, nx~grade III Clerk—cum-‘tvvlst, nnvlronmgnt aeoartment, Shuc L Head Quarters, Seepat ROud, Bilasbur‘ (2) Vivekanand Roy S/o R MH‘oy, acred about 40 years, 14x.grad.e—II clerk VArea Head Quarters, S.’E.C L, Haadeo Ar€a, PO- SOuth Jnamrammnd Colliery, Lustt- burauJaUVlJD) Chief General ianagar, Hasdeo Arua, south £astnrn Loalflelas Limited PO: South Jhaoraixhand pollletynDlsL.SL1rgujag (2) Additional Chie£ Vining Hnglneec, Mlrws xescue station S. “C L PO yancndra ¢rh Dt Su1gu_3a(pl.P) (3) Dy.Persormol Manaoer, sa ‘ ".L, Hasdec area, DO. bouth Ehagrakhano olliery, Dlstt buroujahvuP) (4) Chalunan~cum-Manaqlng Director, S L.C. L, geeoat wad B1] :sour. WQI‘I‘ PLTITION UID R .xxTILLr 226 & 227 Or THE COWSTITUFIOLQ‘ OF lluJIA AGnIIwST ”‘HL INE‘{II\G:3NENT OF TH” hUI\DA‘\?E\T1AL _{LGII’“‘ UNDL. AX‘I‘IbLv-l4 (Sc 21 OF ”v4.3.2 pQNSTILUTION 0" INDIA AND ALoO ALAIN“? TI'F FP{AGNAI\l INJUSII ' BFIWC COMFIT”"D BY THE: KEQPO’GD ‘TS VIOLATIKG ’f‘”E P&II IPL”S OF NATL {AL JUSTICE 7F“ ii HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W.P. No. 741 OF 1996 Petitioners Vijay Kumar and one another Versus Respondents Chiaf General Manager, S‘ECL, Hasdeo Area and 3 others. None for the petitioners. Shri RS. Koshy, counsel for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (4th April, 2006) The matten was called for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appeared nor any representation was made on behalf of the petitioners. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.