IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 992 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.H.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- CHHOTUBHAI K FIRESTA HAWKER Versus MOHMMAD RAFIQ ABDULAMJID MANSURI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR GIRISH D BHATT for Petitioner (MR MC KAPADIA) for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE H.H.MEHTA Date of decision: 24/07/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT Shri G.D.Bhatt, learned advocate for revision petitioner (defendant-tenant) makes a statement that to day he has received an information on phone from Mr. Hakim, the learned advocate for the defendant-tenant who appeared in the trial court as well as in the appellate court that there was a settlement in between both the parties and the defendant-tenant has handed over possession of the suit premises to the revision opponent plaintiff-landlords, and therefore, now there does not remain any cause to persue. In view of this statement, this Civil Revision Application shall stand disposed of accordingly, with a liberty to move appropriately in case of difficulty in future. Rule is discharged, with no order as to costs. Interim relief granted earlier shall stand vacated. Date: 24/7/2000. (H.H.MEHTA, J.) ccshah