:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2065 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.2065 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.2065 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (L) NO.82 OF 2006 (L) NO.82 OF 2006 (L) NO.82 OF 2006 IN IN IN ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.202 OF 2005 PETITION NO.202 OF 2005 PETITION NO.202 OF 2005 M/s.S.M.Samant & Anr. ..Appellants Vs. M/s.Vikram Builders & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.Sunil Purohit i/b.M/s.Purohit & Co.for the Appellants. Ms.Shradha Pathak i/b. Law Charter for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 19TH NOVEMBER,2007 : 19TH NOVEMBER,2007 : 19TH NOVEMBER,2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 23 days delay in filing the above Appeal. Perused the Notice of Motion and affidavit-in-support thereof as well as affidavit-of-service. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay in filing the above Appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)