IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3720 of 2010 KESHAV CHAUDHARY SON OF BRAHAMDEO CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 8.2.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 8.9.2009 passed in Cr.Misc.No.8868 of 2009 on merits, but he has renewed his prayer for bail mainly on the ground that co-accused Pankaj Chaudhary with similar allegations had been released on anticipatory bail subsequent to this order. However on perusal of annexure-3, which is the bail order of the said Pankaj Chaudhary, I find that considerations are quite different and his case is not similar to the case of the petitioner. In view of such, I am not inclined to go into the merits of the case again. The prayer for bail is rejected. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )