IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.353 of 2010 1. NAZIR AHMAD S/O LATE MD. HUSSAIN AT PRESENT RESIDING AT MOHALLA AND P.S. - SULTANGANJ, DISTT. – PATNA .......Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MR. DEEPAK KUMAR, COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY, PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPTT. BIHAR, PATNA 3. MR. RAJESH GUPTA MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE, PATNA 4. MR. C.ASHOK BERDHAN, SECRETARY REVENUE DEPTT. BIHAR, PATNA 5. MR. SUNIL BARTHAL, DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER BIHAR, PATNA ......Opposite Parties ----------- 2 07-09-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The order of the Division Bench at annexure-1 was specific that the enquiry pending against the petitioner should be concluded within two months failing which the order of suspension shall stand revoked w.e.f. 18-3-2002. Admittedly, the suspension order was revoked because the proceeding could not be concluded. In that view of the matter, only because the proceeding is still continuing, no case for contempt is made out. This contempt application is disposed of. If the petitioner is aggrieved by continued pendency of the disciplinary proceeding, it will be open 2 for him to pursue his remedy through appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. BKS/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)