1 W.P.No.9141/11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.9141 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Mr.V.D.Hon, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.N.H.Borade, Asstt.Govt.Pleader for Respondent No.1. Mrs.Agrawal, advocate holding for Mr.B.R.Warma, advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr.V.P.Patil, advocate for Respondent No.3. CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J. Date : 20.12.2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The present petition is filed against an interim order passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Nasik. Mrs.Agrawal, learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 vehemently opposes the petition and submits that the petitioner by suppression of material facts has filed the present petition and sought interim orders from this Court. The application pursuant to which the interim order is passed is not annexed to the petition. The said application gives a detail statement and the reason why the interim orders impugned in the present petition were necessary. Mr.Hon, learned counsel says that 2 W.P.No.9141/11 the said application is not served on the petitioner. Be that as it may, I am not entering into the dispute in that regard. 3. It is intimated by the learned counsel that now the matter is kept on 23.12.2011, before the Joint Charity Commissioner, Nasik. The matter is ripe for final hearing and can be disposed of within a period of 15 days. The learned counsel for respective parties have submitted that they are ready for disposal of the main proceedings itself. 4. Mrs.Agrawal, learned counsel submits that pursuant to the orders passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, the proposals are submitted with the Education Officer. This Court had granted statusquo on 28.11.2011. As the matter is seized with the Joint Charity Commissioner, Nasik, it would not be appropriate to dilate on the merits of the matter, at this stage. 5. In view of the fact that the matter is now fixed on 23.12.2011, I feel it appropriate to direct the parties to maintain statusquo as on today and to decide the proceedings filed by the present petitioner before the Joint Charity Commissioner, Nasik. 6. In the result, I pass the following order: (a) The order of statusquo passed on 20.11.2011, is continued till the disposal of the proceedings before the Joint Charity Commissioner pending between the parties. The Joint Charity Commissioner shall dispose of the proceedings within a period of 3 W.P.No.9141/11 15 days from today on its own merits. 7. I have not dealt any of the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for respective parties nor I have made any observations on the merits of the matter. The Joint Charity Commissioner, Nasik, shall decide the matter on its own merits on the basis of the record available and the arguments advanced by the respective parties. 8. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) Dt.20.12.2011. asp/office/wp9141.11 4 W.P.No.9141/11