IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 17039 of 2002 BETWEEN: Fruit Commission Merchants Association, Rep. by its General Secretary, Regd. No. 10/73, Mango Market Kedareswarapet Vijayawada. ... PETITIONER AND 1. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary to Govt. Municipal Adm. & Urban Dev. Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad. 2. Vijayawada Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Vijayawada ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the Go. Rt No. 617 MA Dt. 23-5-2002 issued by the Government of A.P. the Municipal Administration and Urban Development (NI) Department as arbitrary illegal capricious and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently declare the Go. Rt No. 638 MA dated 28-5-2002 issued by the Government of A.P. the Municipal Administration and Urban Development (NI) Department is contrary to the provisions of 679-A of HMC Act and pass such other orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following: ORDER: Mr. C.C.S. Sastry, learned counsel, representing Mr. Sai Gangadhar Chamarthy, submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J May 2, 2008 DSK