1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 1649 OF 2006 Smt. Hiralaxmi P. Shah ...Plaintiff. Vs. Prakash M. Davda ...Defendant. Ms. Armin Wandrewala i/by M/s. Utangle & Co. for the Plaintiff. Mr.A.L. Singh for the Defendant. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 4th November, 2009. P.C.- 1 The parties have arrived at the settlement and signed the consent terms dated 8th October, 2009. The same is taken on record and marked as Exhibit “X” for identification. 2 The consent terms signed by the Plaintiff is not present in the Court because of her serious illness and as she is hospitalized. Her Power of Attorney Holder Mr. Nipun Thakkar is present in the Court. The copy of power of Attorney, is taken on record. He is present in the Court. The respective Advocates also signed the same. The statement is made at the bar that no third party or person rights involved in the present litigation. The consent terms will not affect any third person. 3 The consent terms are well within the framework of law and the 2 record. 4 The undertaking given by the defendant, recorded in the consent terms, is accepted, as accepted by the parties also. 5 In view of this, the present suit is decreed in terms of consent terms. The decree be drawn expeditiously. 6 The refund of Court fee, if any, in accordance with law. 7 The certified copy is expedited. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)