THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOs.5132, 5131, 5133, 5134 AND 5135 OF 2007 COMMON ORDER: The petitioner filed all these revisions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking to assail the orders dated 14.08.2007 in I.A.Nos.38, 42, 40, 41 and 39 of 2006 in O.S.Nos.194, 189, 293, 190 and 294 of 2003 respectively, on the file of the X Additional Chief Judge (FTC), City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in dismissing the petitions filed under Order I Rule 10 (3) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to implead the proposed R-4 and R-5 as defendants 4 and 5 in the main suits. By taking into account the nature of the suits, vis-à-vis the allegations contained in the respective pleadings, the Court below gave a categorically finding that the proposed parties are none other than strangers and not parties to the contract and they are no way concerned with the suit transaction and hence, did not find favour with the request made by the petitioner. Hence, the revisions. The only argument, which has been put forth on behalf of the petitioner, is in regard to avoid multiplicity of the proceedings, he seeks impleadment of the proposed parties. Having heard the submissions made and on perusal of the material available on record, it is seen that the principles of corporate veil cannot be ushered in the similar proceedings. It is always open for the petitioner to file proper comprehensive suit and club all the suits for disposal together, where the petitioner can raise all the pleas and objections, which will be considered and disposed of in accordance with law uninfluenced by any of these observations. In view of the above, all the five Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 10th December 2010 RRB