IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.355 of 2008 Between: 1 C.Munikrishnaiah, S/o.C.Govindaiah, Thandlam(V),Ranigunta(M), Chittoor Dist 2 N.Bhaskar, S/o.N.Dharmaiah, Thandlam(V),Ranigunta(M), Chittoor Dist 3 K.Bathaiah, S/o.Subbaiah, Thandlam(V),Ranigunta(M), Chittoor Dist 4 C.Chanagamma, W/o.Late C.Venkatasubbaiah, Thandlam(V),Ranigunta(M), Chittoor Dist 5 K.Chengalrayalu, S/o.K.Munaiah, Thandlam(V),Ranigunta(M), Chittoor Dist 6 B.Munikrishnaiah, S/o.Gangaiah, Thandlam(V),Ranigunta(M), Chittoor Dist 7 Dasari Ramachandraiah, S/o.Munaiah, Thandlam(V),Ranigunta(M), Chittoor Dist 8 C.Sundar Ramaiah, S/o.Late Krishnaiah, Thandlam(V),Ranigunta(M), Chittoor Dist ..... PETITIONERS AND The Tahsildar Renigunta(M),Chittoor Dist .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondent in threatening to dispossess the petitioners without passing any orders to the explanation submitted to the Show cause notice issued in Roc.No.B/1261/2007 dt.11-12-2007 as illegal,arbitrary and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioners:SRI O.MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.355 of 2008 ORDER: Learned Counsel Sri S.V.Ramana, representing the learned Counsel for the petitioners, Sri O.Manoher Reddy, submits that the matter has become infructuous. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 20.11.2008 vs To 1 The Tahsildar Renigunta(M),Chittoor Dist 2 2CCs to G.P for Revenue, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 3 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{BMR}