IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.10000 -M of 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : AUGUST 11, 2011 MANISH KUMAR ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Sachin Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Addl.AG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 This petition has been filed under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, praying for quashing of FIR No.22 dated 2.2.2007 under Sections 452, 354, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Islamabad, District Amritsar (Annexure P-1) and consequent proceedings, on the basis of compromise dated 28.2.2011 (Annexure P-2). 2 It has been brought out that vide judgment dated 15.7.2010 (Annexure P-3), the petitioner has been convicted of the offences and sentenced accordingly. First appeal of the petitioner is pending adjudication in the Court of Sessions. 3 In view of the stage of the case, no ground for quashing of the FIR is made out as the FIR and other proceedings have merged in the judgment of conviction. Criminal Misc. No.10000 -M of 2011 (O&M) 2 4 The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. 5 It goes without saying that the factum of compromise can be brought to the notice of the appellate court, which shall consider the same for the purpose of considering the quantum of sentence. August 11, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?