THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1720 of 2010 Date: 29.04.2010 Between: R. Narasaiah Warangal District ..... PETITIONER AND G.Gattamma Hanmakonda, Warangal District and another. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: The petitioner/plaintiff filed this Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 19.11.2009 passed by II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal in I.A.No.1867 of 2009 in O.S.No.288 of 2001. The petitioner herein filed the suit for simplicitor injunction. As per the plaint schedule it is shown as land covered by S.No.375 corresponding to old Survey No.164. The suit is being contested by the respondents and even according to the petitioner the trial is completed and the matter is coming up for arguments. At that stage, the petitioner filed the present Interlocutory Application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC to amend the plaint by adding old S.No.164 corresponding to new S.No.375. The Court below dismissed the application by order dated 19.11.2009. Hence, this revision petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of the proviso under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C, at any stage of the proceedings amendment can be permitted. It is to be noticed that in view of the proviso to Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C., no application for amendment shall be allowed after the trial is commenced unless the Court comes to the conclusion that inspite of due diligence, the party could not have raised the matter before the commencement of trial. Here is a case even according to the petitioner the trial is completed and the matter is coming for arguments. If the proposed amendment is permitted at this stage it causes prejudice to the case of the respondents. Further, in the affidavit filed in support of the petition also no valid reasons have been assigned to get over the proviso to Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. In that view of the matter, I do not find any merit in this Civil Revision Petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. R.SUBHASH REDDY, J Date: 29.04.2010 va