^ .^^W^:^S!S^S^^& ^\. (jf-A^ IN THEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) WRIT PETITION (S} N0. 4^-0 OF 200^ PETITIONER vo^y.- ^SG.--""" ....•^iM^0-'"" .A^*'//i'\--'" }-^ ^•y '^- RESPQNDENTS ^ Malikram Nag Son of Shri Sukhlal Nag, aged about 40 years, . Presently posted at Govt. Primary School Pilagpali, Block Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.). VERSUS ^l. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of School Education, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). / 2. The District Education Officer, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.). ^3. The Block Education Officer, Basna, District Mahasamund (C:G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS. DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. F HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BiXLASWtt SIN6LE BENCH : HON-BLE WR. SATISH K. ASMHCFTKt. J. WMT PETTTION (S.) NB.4B8 OF 2007 PBtMwner : Duryodhon Sao WTSB Respondents State of Oihattfegarh ond others PetMwner WRTT PETITION (S.) No.«9OF 2007 NoB'shigh Khunte wrsus Respondents Slute of ChhatKsgarh and o'thers WRTT PrrmON (S.l No.460 OF 2007 Petitioner : Malikrom Nng Reapondwrts State of ChhatKsgarh and olters WRTT PETTTION (S.) ND.461 OF 2007 Retitioner : Bholu Ppcaad Chauhon veraus ResDondents State of ChhatHsgarh ond o-ttNsrs PetrHoner WMT P6TTTION (5.1 Nu.462 OF 2007 ; Amarbilas Sno versus Respondents Stete of Chhattisgorh and olhers WRTT PETTTION fS.l No.463 OF 2007 Petrtwner : Ramesh Kunwr Pntel Respondents Stat* of Chhuttisgnrh and 0'fhers Present : Mr.PP. Saha, counael for -the petrtioner(s). Mr. Satish 6upta, Oepuly fiovemment Advocate for •the State/respondents. OROER 0'assed on •this 24* Ooy of January. 2007) »i- Leamed counael appenring for •the partics johtty aubmit •that the ' facts cnd <|uestwn of law involved in •thc present batch of writ petitwns are sqiwrely covered by •the decision of this Coirt in •the caae of yasAiwi^ <i*»Mr flhiradlKt/ vs. <Numta(na/ ^'wpflinifttow. Owy anrf anortw^. 2. For the afonsmentioned nasons, •these writ petitions are diysed of ffi terms of -the decision of this Court' in Ihe matter of Yeahwant fSwiw Siwvdwc^j (Supru), aubject' to vwificution of the faet as to A whether Ihe petitioners haw cuquired B.TX CertificatBS at their own expenses as per Ihe drculars dated 24-12-1998 ond 1-3-1999 ond furrtter whether •they hcwe been paid two adwnce mcrements or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of -this order be ptaced on -thc record of Ihe connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatisbK.Agnihotri Judge Thdar 1 2006CII)MPJR-C696