IN THE HIGH COUIST Q? CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIOI&No. NARAYAN LAL CHANDRAKAR S/0. SHRI THANU RAM CHANDRAKAR, x<^ ^[^ ^^M^- ^^s^" ^y.. AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, ASSISTANT TEACHER, GOVT. PRIMARY GIRLS SCHOOL TUMGAON, R/o. SHRI RAMKRISHNA MISHRA COLLEGE ROAD, WARD N0.15, MAHASAMUND DISTRICT MAHASAMUND (C.G.). VERSUS /. RESPONDENTS /:lj STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. ,/' •f*.1-.'/ /' t^ f' \r^' &• THROUGH DEPARMENT SECRETARY, OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, DKS BHAWAN, RAIPUR (C.G.S) :2) DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, MAHASAMUND :3) BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, V MAHASAMUND DISTRICT MAHASAMUND (C.G.) XI-HC-22 sn^r^iT Rawsn^r a>iri5Rfff?(T •^ 73['^SKT!f, Vn^W'W, Rlctiyy an^^T^^cft 11*1WI Shlich (clfe^ 200-6 3n^T?Rnw;a^ff •ihi<<t<-i41-f ii^ciT^'te^'^wK ^srf^irsn^T 29.8.2006 Mrs. Hamida Siddique, coui^sel for •f+ie petitioner. Mr. Satish 6upta, Deputy ^ovt. Advoeote for the State/respontients, on advance copy. Heord. The cose of the petitione^- is that he is t»orkin9 as Assistant Teacher ond as per the Instruction doteif 24-12-98 issued by the State of M.P., the Assistont Teachers ufho hwe po]ssed B.T.I., B.Ed. and M.Ed. examination on their own expenses after 22-10-^4 ar-e entitled for two advance increments. The petitionei* passed the B.Ed. ^xomination on his own cost in the year 1996 and copy of the ma-k sheet to thjrt effect is Annexire P-2, but the petitioner has not been gwen the benefit, t^hereas, similarly situated persons have been granted two advanee increments Court. Havirg heard leapned courujel for the parties. having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, w^hout expressing ony opinion on the mer-it of the case, the petitioner 'is allowe^ No.2 within a period of 15 days directed to excniine the case of under •rfie orders of the Tribunal and -Ms to moke a detailed repnsentation along with a copy of this petition and its ann^xtres rmsiry alt his grievaices to respwident from todoy and in turn, respondent No.2 is the petitioner in the h"9ht of tfie averments made by the petitioner in this wr^ petjtion and in the representation also. If respondent No.2 reaches to the c^nclusion that similarly situoted persons have been granted benefit of Iwo ddv^ince increments and the petitioner's case is also cpvered for grant of two adv^nce increments on the basis of &ovemment's (<ft^^fwt) (^it^) XI-HC-22 Sn^T^iT f^iRisn^r sbt) (rf^(T sbtfW Soma ^^ ^K 's'si '^ww^, vnS\w\e, Rdi+iy 3T1^?T^iach qT«W11 ShHKh 200^ fa^% an^TCTtlTWfffSff 2-' order, then respondent No.2 sha( petitioner within a period of 3 accordance with law. With the directions aforesotd Parties ore entitled for cerlli °bl'4fff'i()-1 H|t|(lTfffec^t<Rl+<;K ^iSff^ITSn^T pass order on the representation of the months from the date of its receipt, in I, the petition stands disposed o£_ fied copy of this order. Sd/'- L.C.Bhadoo Judge ('ft^^f^)