IN THE HIGH COUT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 665 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 1154 OF 2004 Ganpati Daji Tevbale & anr. ..... Appellant Vs. Sou. Tarabai Atymaram Ghadage since deceased through L.rs. Atmaram Narayan Ghadage & ors. .... Respondents Mr. Dilip Bodke for the appellant- absernt Mr. Prathamesh Bargude for respondent. CORAM : R.G. KETKAR, J. DATE : 14th June, 2010. P.C. : 1. This is an application for bringing on record the heirs and legal representatives of respondent no.5 Smt. Gokulabai @ Bakula Jijiba Yevale. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the application is beyond 180 days and the explanation given in para 5 of the application is not satisfactory and therefore the same be rejected. 3. After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, I find that the applicant has substantially explained the delay and hence the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), (b), (c) and (d) with no order as to costs. Amendment to be carried out in one weeks from today. [R.G. KETKAR, J.]