IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11940/2008 Decided on:30.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Singhu Ram. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and another. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner is aggrieved by the issuance of memorandum dated 15.10.2004. Petitioner has not preferred any statutory appeal against the same. However, in the interest of justice, petitioner is permitted to file an appeal before the appellate authority against the memorandum dated 15.10.2004, within a period of three weeks, from today and thereafter the Appellate Authority shall decide the same on its own merits without influenced by delay and laches 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 within a period of two months after the receipt of appeal alongwith certified copy of this judgment. 2. In the light of above, the petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 30.12.2010 *awasthi*