IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1925 of 2011 MUSTAKIM ANSARI @ MUSTAQUEEM ANSARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 25.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report and it is stated that looted sim of the mobile was recovered from his possession. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the seized sim is not looted property and moreover, there is nothing in the case diary to show this fact that the aforesaid sim was looted from the house of the informant and moreover, the petitioner is languishing in jail custody since long but up-till-now he has not been put on T.I.P. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sessions Trial No. 760 of 2010 arising out of Kazi Mohammadpur P.S. Case No. 132 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )