[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.563 OF 2008 IN REVN.APPLN.NO.576 OF 2008 Mrs.Hasina Khan ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.Rishi Bhuta Advocate for Applicant Mr.Y.M.Nakhwa APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : DECEMBER 16, 2008 DATE : DECEMBER 16, 2008 DATE : DECEMBER 16, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant-original accused and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant has been convicted under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The compensation amount imposed by the learned Magistrate is Rs.44,000/-. Out of the said amount, Rs.22,000/- has already been deposited by the applicant. In addition thereto, the applicant showed willingness to deposit balance amount before [-2-] the trial Court by 11.12.2008. However, as the record and proceedings were not received back by the trial Court from the Sessions Court, the amount could not be deposited before the trial Court. The learned advocate for the applicant states that the said amount will be deposited in this Court within a period of one week from today. Time to deposit balance amount is extended by one week from today. It is made clear that instead of trial Court, amount shall be deposited in this Court. In view of the fact that balance amount is being deposited in this Court within a week, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 3. The applicant-Mrs.Hasina Khan to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rs.ten thousand only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. As the applicant is already on temporary bail, the sureties shall be furnished within a period of four weeks from today. 4. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]