IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.: 4129 of 2008. Decided on: 04.10.2010. __________________________________________________________ Tej Lal. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. K.C. Sankhyan, Advocate vice Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.4. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, Annexure P-2, dated 2.9.1997 is quashed and set aside. However, liberty is reserved to the respondent/State to proceed with the matter in accordance with law after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 2. In view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 04, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?