SINGLPBENCH c f'\a'> IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l W.P.No.^94^2005 PETITIONER ^' 4 RESPONDENT $ j.^ll^3 '^^^. ^*":'" SUKRIT DAS, S/o Bodhram, Aged about- 38 years, Caste-Mahant, R/o. Darrabhata, Tehsil- Malkhroda, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh). The Collector, Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sakti, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. under: The above named petitioner respectfully beg to submit as <iiHrtia?^T^ vdwi ^i<4irt<4, y-al^<i<?, Roi^-iyx rfg;......Hf..L?..(?.trt./.?^.... W^200 3I1^5T q^P (^c||i^6|«^) 3Tr^^Tc?5Tfe;:rt<P ^S?T3TT^^T^1Rtc[? ^T^TW ^rf^T 3T^^T 13.6.200S Shri P,K, Patel, counsel 226/227 of the Constitution on the part of the respondents). The petitioner?s case i^ Bodliai, who was workmg on 1 Village Darrabhata, Teshil Ms CRI<<fo41<r1 ^I^C^ ^'I^l^l Ki^t^-CIK ^3Tl^H3TT^$T |for fhe petitioner. Shri Saiideep Dubey, Gk^vt. Advocate for thc State, Heard, The petitioner has pre|ferrcd this writ petitioii under Article ^f India beiag aggrieved foy fhe iiiaction fhat he is the giaaddaughter of Late tlie post of ViUage Kotovar beforc 1950 m plkharuda, Distrfct Jaajgir-Ctiampa. The fhen Malguzars had graxited 4 plot ofland bearing Khasya Nos,473 & 540 Rakba 0,32 & 5.05 acies patwari Halka No.7 to fhe grand father of petttiouer and siace thca ft^e petitioner and his aiicestons are iii said laad aiid the rclevaat documents petitioner's further case is that m writ |d as Chhabil Das & others Vs, State of coutinuous possession of th€| are Aunexurc P-6 to P-9. Th^ petition No.2632/2000 entifl^ M.P. & others aad W.P. No.2p64/2000 entifled aa Tikaram & others Vs. State ofM.P. & othcrs ^idc orderdatcd 30.10.2001 this Court directed the competent auth^rity to grant Bbumtewami rights to tiie Kotwars, who were Kotwars Aiinexures P-2 & P-3 and cin) before 1950, copies of the onlers are xilar dated 18,5.04 issued m thia regard is Axmexure P-5. In compliaDJce offhesaM orders fhe petitioner had filed an appUcation (Aniiexur|s P-l) undcr Section 57(2} of fhe Laad Revenue Code, 1959 before tespondent No.S-Sub Divisional Officer, Salrti for graat of Bhumisw^mi right, but rcspondeiit No,3 is not decidiag the said application. SP/FS/2005-20,000 *ll*l«l^TT^ \d-cq ^|<4|0^, tP-al<<-l<l<o, Rc'Xt-l^ ^.............ll^/.^......... ^200 OT^^TcFnf^TtcI? ns?T3TT^^T^Hte ^ 3:TT^$T ^(cf> (4cji»j6|«ri) ?'^TTWr^f^T3TT^$T ^^ cpi<4fo<n^ ^TRc^T^T^^ ^R»i^i^ iRsri^Hsn^sT Learaed coiuisel for th€\petitioner subxnite that respondent No.3 be directed to decide fhe ap|plioation of the petitioner and pass fhe order/to which leamed coun^el for fhe respondeiits has no objection. Having heard leamed c|ounsel for the parties aiid Iiaviag regard to the facte ancl circiinistaiicets oftfae case, respondent No.3 is directed to decide fhe application of ^eutioner filed iinder Sectson 57(2) ofthe C.G. Land Revenue Code, 19|59 withm a period of fhree monfhs from todav in accordancc wiffa law.l With tiie dircction afore|said, the petition stands disposed of. Consequentiy, M.W.P. 3753/05 also stand disposedjof. Certified copy as per ru|es. No. 1582/05 & I.A. Nos.3752/05 & Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge ^, ; SP/F§/2005-20,000 ^' Y^s ^