IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.225 of 2010 1. UMESHWAR PANDEY, S/O SRI RAM BACHAN PANDEY, R/O VILL- BISHAMBHARPUR, P.O.- MOAP KALA, P.S. IMADPUR, DISTT. BHOJPUR Versus 1. DR. SAFINA A.N. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR BHOJPUR (ARA) W/O NOT KNOWN, DISTT. BHOJPUR (ARA) 2. RAJIV CHAUHAN, THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT RAJ OFFICER, BHOJPUR S/O NOT KNOWN DISTT. BHOJPUR (ARA) 3. ATUR RAHMAN, THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, TARARI S/O NOT KNOWN P.S. TARARI, DISTT. BHOJPUR (ARA) 4. THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 23.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The order on the writ petition was for disposal of a representation only when the petitioner in haste did not even press the representation on its merit. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the representation was allowed favourably. After the respondents were required to file a show cause in the present proceeding, they have passed a fresh order cancelling the earlier final order on the representation, after giving an opportunity to show cause to the petitioner. On the own showing of he petitioner, the order dated 6.3.2009 stood complied when the representation was disposed. If after a show cause notice, any fresh orders have been passed on 3.2.2011, 2 the merits of the same can be examined only in a fresh writ application. The proceeding stands disposed. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)