IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51884 of 2008 1. KAMESHWAR MISTRY, S/O SRI CHHATTI LAL MISTRY 2. NARAYAN MISTRY, S/O SRI KAMESHWAR MISTRY BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- CHHITNAMA, P.S. MANER, DISTRICT-PATNA ……….. PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ……….. OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 02/ 02-02-2009 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State and the informant. Petitioners are accused in a case under Sections 363, 365, 367 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that the petitioners were seen by two persons with the boy who was kidnapped. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the F.I.R. has been lodged after a delay and in fact the petitioners have been pressurized to bring the boy and when they could not bring the boy the F.I.R. was instituted. All these facts may be a good ground for consideration of regular bail of the petitioners. It is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. In the result, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed. S.Sb/- (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)