CWP No. 20889 of 2010 Jagir Singh vs. State of Punjab and another Present: Ms.Monika Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. *** The petitioner has a dispute regarding the payment he has to make for a booth which he had purchased from respondent-GLADA. Earlier the petitioner had obtained a decree against the respondents for a direction to them to put him in possession of the booth and to charge proportionate price for the same after giving benefit of interest etc. for the payment/s deposited by him from time to time. As per learned counsel for the petitioner, while passing the impugned demand notice, the respondents have not adhered to the direction given by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) and has made wrong calculations to the detriment of the petitioner. When I expressed my inability to adjudicate on the merits of the petition since the petitioner had already filed a civl suit and got the relief also, learned counsel for the petitioner states that she would be satisfied if the representations of the petitioner Annexure P-7(colly) are decided by respondent No.2 by passing a speaking order thereon within any reasonable time. I find this to be a fair request. In the circumstances this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representations Annexure P-7(colly) within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE November 23, 2010 sunita