1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 1032 of 2011 Dharmendra v. Abhinav and anr -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr P.S. Patil, Advocate for petitioner Ms Bharti Dangre, Addl. GP for respdt no.2 Coram: D.D. Sinha and A. P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 28th March 2011 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Government Pleader for respondent no.2. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already made representation to respondent no. 2 for redressal of his grievance which may be directed to be decided within the stipulated period. 3. In the circumstances, we dispose of writ petition with direction to respondent no.2 to decide representation of the petitioner, if not earlier decided, in accordance with law and procedure applicable in this regard, within a period of eight weeks from today. JUDGE JUDGE joshi 2