55 r r CriminalRevision No390 of2005 1 IN HE HlGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CriminalRevision N01390of2005 DateofDecision 18112010 JaswinderSingh Pelitioner VERSUS StateIf Punjab W CORAM HONJ3LE MR JUSTICE ANJINDAL 0 rCSCIll l Punchhi Aclvocalc 0 for lhe petiIioner I C5 lvlrAmil Chaudhary Asstl Advocale Gcneral Punjab for the I 8 8 87Ilrlt Z LlNJINDAL J C4 in the passportand elnbarkationcard havedragged llle I herein rcferred as thc accusedJ ll lce l ploscciitioil Z On trial vidc datcd 26072003 passcd bySub Divisal Judicial 00 AjnalallC was convictcdand sentcncedto undergorigorous evm for a periodof two yearsand to pay a flne of Rs300lndcr Z Scclion 419 IlC and rigorous for a periodofone year and to pay a fillc of Rs001 undcr Section 471 TPC IIis aploeal rias also clismisscclon 041372005 The factual malrix of the case is thal the accused IiIas illtnd in C of a 13rilish in the name of Kanivaljil SinghJando bcaringNo036211542 datcd 2301999 aif tickcl boardingpass and enlbarkationcard Ivith an intention to go Turkmenistan When he beforcMunish Anand OfOcer fclr cIearance then thc Iallcr while checking n o li c c cl thal lhc atival sl2Ilnpof RajaSansi A irpor Anita 2012.10.31 13: 14 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 56 CriminalRevisionNo1390 of2005 2 Amrilsardaled1002001was and lhe signature of lhe accusedon lhepassportin and theembarkationcardalso did not tally On it came to lightthat the accused was originallyJaswinder However the passporlissued in the nanle of Kanivalj il Singh Jandu was beari ng his He filrlher disclosed that hc had thls passportlhrough onc Lakhi travelagentbypayinga sum of 1 Rs000001 He had also passpoilail ticlcl as well as ticlrel 01 r Amritsar The OOllcertook lhe aforesaiddoculnenls inlO 0 0 vide a seizure memo other articles He furtheisent ruqato thepolicestation on thebasisof which FlR ExlB was C5 hitn andthe coinmenccd of Z WlS bya reporlunderSeclion 73CrPC Theaccusedwas challaned under Sections 419 420 468 and Ct 471IPC to which he nol guiltyandclaimed trial I t3 l n order to substantiatethechargcs1le examined Z MunishAnand 0cer 6PWl and Asst Sub Inspectorlqbal oo Singh2W21 7 Z Whenexaminedunder Seclion 313 CrOC the accuseddenicd Qm all lhcallcgaions and his false implication in thecase On trial the accused n7as conviclecl and sentcnced HisapIoeal wlas also dismissed While opcninglhe argumentsit has been contended by r MrSandeepPunchlli counsel for the that in order to establishthe guiltagainstthe accused il was on lhc parlofthe to Iead sufOcienlevidence for provinghis complicityin the comlTlISS1011 of crimc ExccptMunish Anand 6PWl9and ASl lqbalSingh Anita 2012.10.31 13: 14 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 57 W Criminal Revision Nol390 of2005 3 6PW2 no otherwilness has been exatnined Even lravel agenllhrough Ivlloln he has lhe passportand the einbarkationcard has notbcen examined thcreforethe benelltofdoubt should be extendedto the accusecl 10 thccontrarywhile takingme thllough thcjuclgmcnl and the cliclcnccrccordcd bylhe trial Courl learncdStatecouilsclllas stiessecltllat 1 thcconviction recorded by both the Courts below does not suggest2U1V Q suchinterfcrcnce 0 0 Having scrulinizcd the record of thc casc bolh the Courls I 11lolv havc CCOrdcdthe of fact that lhc ziccuscdwhilc cariIitlga C5 I passporlIil llle Ilamc of Kanwalj it SinghJandLl over which Ilis 014i1 Z has been fixed alongwilh an embarkalion card ilIellt l9 llle 3117rt well that he was not KanwaljitSinghJandu and hc atl intcntion lo go abroad lnade an efforl to cheal the passport I authclrics the aforesaid documellls air licket I3olh Z theIvilncsseshavc also statedlhal passport bI f lllc 2lccuseddicl ilol bclclnglo hiiTland his nalne w21S llol Sillgll 7 Z Jililclu Thcyhavc also statedthal the accuseddishoncslly 21i11iatldllleill I tl liIill a motilc to travel abroad tried to throw dust in the cyes of theairpcoil authorities Munish Anand PWl rciteratedlhe as mentioned him in lhc applicaIoflwhile teslifying tllatthe acciscd had iellealecll1is t namcas laswindcr SingllSOll of Mukhliar Singhresiclenlof villageJodha NagriDisll Anlrillsar Duringhis investigalitlnlle llas A11thelsl2ltecilllal tllc ccllsccl had iclinillcd before hiin that lhal Lhcpassllt1rlwas Slippllcdlo him byone Lakhl 1csitlentof Nakod21rRoad near Marble shopJalarlclhal on of Rs000001 This prosecution VerSlOll SlalldS by Anita 2012.10.31 13: 14 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 58 lv m Criminal Revision No1390 of2005 4 9r lllc stalcilleilt ol accused under Section 313 CrIC alsc Ileieiil Ile h21S stalccl lhat his ilalne is nol KanwaljitSinghJandu but llc is acltlalll Jaswinder Singh Since the forgecldoculnent hacl conle 00111lhe of the accused and he beingbeneliciaryunder lhc said clcuillenls had presenled thesanle beforeMunish Ailarld 6PWl tlleieie 110 furtherevidence was to prove lhc offcncesfor which IIe has m bccn chargedWithout furtherdelvingdeepinto the evidcnce it is obscrvcd 0 Illtlt both the Courts loelow have the evidence Ill lhc right 0 0 NcI stlcll illcgality 11111CillcSS lrregulanly or inani lesl crror I C9 apparcntOll thc rccord which may cause any prejudicc 10 the accused has I Ioccnpointcdoul of evidenceat this rcvislonal slagc1Sllot Z lhis joelilionIoclllgclcvoid o f anv lneril IS disinisscc I 1 Z QO Judge 182010 7 nlainta4l Z Llm e r c 1 Anita 2012.10.31 13: 14 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document