1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29/4/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD)No.5219 of 2011 T.Bemarajan ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Government of Tamil Nadu rep. By its Home Secretary Fort St. George Chennai 600 009. 2. The Director General of Police Kamarajar Salai Mylapore Chennai 600 004. 3. The Commissioner of Police Trichy. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second and third respondents to fix the seniority and give the monetary benefits on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 11/2/2011. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rajaram For Respondents : Mr.N.Ilango, Government Advocate - - - - - O R D E R Mr.N.Ilango, Government Advocate takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 4. The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition praying to direct the second and third respondents to fix the seniority and give the monetary benefits on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 11/2/2011. 5. The case of the petitioner is that, he has retired as Head Constable of Police in Trichy City. He was promoted to GR - I PC in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 the year 1993. He had worked in the said post for five years and from Grade – I PC and thereafter, he was promoted to the post of Head Constable. Without further promotion, he has retired from the post of Sub-Inspector of Police on attaining the age of super annuation on 30/9/2009. He has given several representations to the respondents to adhere the orders made in G.O.Ms.No.1681 and G.O.Ms.No.844 for the promotion of Grade – I, but the respondents have not obliged the Government Orders. Since Grade - I PC Promotion was delayed, in spite of G.Os referred to above, the petitioner had made a representation dated 11/2/2011 to the respondents. Since the same has not been considered so far, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing the present Writ Petition. 6. Considering the above facts and circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the claim made by the petitioner, I direct the second respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 11/2/2011 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. This Writ Petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(Accts.) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1. The Home Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. 2. The Director General of Police Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004. 3. The Commissioner of Police, Trichy. +1cc to the Special Govt.Pleader, Sr.No. 16199 mvs ssk/02.06.2011 /5c -2p/- W.P.(MD)No.5219 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/