IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APLICATION NO.1230/2009 (Sanjay Zote & another ..vs.. State ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : S.R.DONGAONKAR, J. DATE : 24th APRIL, 2009 Heard Thakkar, Advocate for the applicant and Shri Mandpe APP for state. By this application under section 439 of Cr.P.C., the applicants are claiming bail. Applicant no.1 is the husband of deceased, whereas applicant no.2 is the father in law. The allegations against the applicants are for the offences punishable under section 304-B, 306, 498-A, r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code. The other accused are released on bail who are mother in law and sister in law of the accused. It appears that the material allegations of the offences are against the applicant no.1. General allegations are there against applicant no.2 as regards harassment. As the charge sheet has been filed and the matter is likely to be considered on merits by the trial court, it will be in the fitness of the things to release the applicant no.2 on bail. In these circumstances, application in respect of applicant no.1 is rejected, however, with a liberty, to move afresh if the trial does not commence within a period of three months from today. Applicant no.2 be released on bail, on furnishing surety and PRB of Rs. 15000/-, subject to conditions that he shall attend the trial regularly and shall not directly or indirectly tamper with the prosecution evidence. Bail in trial court. Application stands disposed of. Hamdast granted. JUDGE smp