IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2011 / 13TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 7037 of 2011(D) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- C.K.JIJEESH, CHAKKALAKKAL HOUSE, DIVISION B, ATHIRAPPALLY ESTATE, KALADY PLANTATION P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.PRAVEEN KUMAR RESPONDENTS --------------- 1. THE PLANTATION CORPORATION OF KERALA LTD, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, KOTTAYAM - 686 001. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, PLANTATION CORPORATION OF KERALA LTD, WEST HILL, KOZHIKODE - 673 005. 3. THE MANAGER, KASARAGOD ESTATE, PLANTATION CORPORATION OF KERALA LTD, KASARAGOD - 673 314. R1 TO R3 BY ADV. SRI.JOY JOSEPH(KOTTAYAM) SRI.MATHEWS K.UTHUPPACHAN SRI.BINU MATHEW SRI.TERRY V.JAMES SRI.B.J.JOHN PRAKASH SRI.TOM THOMAS (KAKKUZHIYIL) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 7037 OF 2011 ......................................................................... Dated this the 3rd June, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers: “a) issue a writ of mandamus or any appropriate writ order or direction, directing the respondents to pay the amount of the work executed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible. b) to declare that the petitioner is entitled to get the amount of work executed by him and which is used by the respondents for planting the cashew saplings, with interest. c) to grant such other reliefs prayed for from time to time including cost of these proceedings. 2. A statement has been filed on behalf of respondents 1 to 3 disputing the claim of the petitioner. 3. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the W.P.(C) No. 7037 OF 2011 2 petitioner would like to pursue the matter by approaching the first respondent before whom Ext.P4 representation is pending. Interference is declined and the writ petition is dismissed, however without prejudice to the rights and liberty of the petitioner to pursue further steps in respect of Ext. P4 before the first respondent. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk