m §‘ m ‘ m ,¢ ‘/1\ 027 r. S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITIONS) N025 3 Q2009. PEI‘ITIONER: // Smt.Sunita Pandey, w/o A.K.Pandey, aged about 45 years, Lecturer, Govt.Higher Secondary School, Sector-9, Hospital, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. versus Respondents r/l. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. / 2. Director, Lok Shikshan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. District Education Officer, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA \éw ‘ -“‘ ?9\ m Fm. .£L§$€i€:<3 ?r§%mker mwgker; Wrii Paé£§m {g} Na %§$ of ww Smt Sunk Pamdey VERSUS State 6f Chhafréiwarh d others. an PEW?E$E&ER ‘ SM N. Nande counsel for the peiétiomer. Smt. Smitha Ghai PL for the respondents/State. WRW PETiTmN UN§ER AR?i€LE 225 OF THE CONST§TUT30N {W lNDiA O R w E R {1?.G?.20%) h e naw. Wiih the canserfi 0f ie counsei far ih parties, ths {miim is heard ChaHenge in ‘éms peiitiori is to the arder datad 612609 (Annexure P4} mssed by responder}: N96 by which {he petiimner wha is wafkirag as Lecmrer in Gavemmem H%gher $econdary School, Seam 9, BhHai has been franserred i0 Governent Higher Secondary School, Dhaur. Counsei for ‘ihe pe%§tioner $ubmEis that in the psent ptaee of posting the eetiticner has jetned onty on 4.7.2608 and withtn cne year there tram ehe has again been shted by the émpugned erder. He tutthr submits hat the petittener is cancer patient anti is taking treatment at Sector 9 Hospitat Bhitai. He further submits that if the petitioner is fced te go and join in her traneierred piec which is admittediy a viiiage, she wouid be in great dii‘i‘icuity as there is no proper medicai ‘t‘aciiity eic. On the other handcounsei for the respondents/$tate submits that ii the petitioner makes a representation to the authorities concerned, the same shat! be considered and decided in accordance with iaw. To this proposition of the $tate counsei, counsel for the petitioner showed hie agreement. Accordingiy, the petition is disposed 0t with a direction to the authorities concerned that in case the petitioner makes a representation within a period of i9 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. the same shaii be decided Within a further period of three weeks from the date of its receipt. Tiii then the order impugned shaii not operate so far as it reiates to the petitioner. 8d]- Pritinker Diwaker i’ Judge HEGH {:GgR? @F C€§HMEE$GH A? ELASPUR {m € 3 RES?€3¥K§EEN?$ S fi f m re if e t a or e