IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.64 of 2010 SHAMBHU SHARAN SINGH, son of late Laxmi Narain Singh, resident of village Govind Chak, PS Sonepur, District Saran ……Petitioner Versus 1. UNION OF INDIA through the GM North-Eastern Railway, Gorakhpur, PO & PS and District Gorakhpur (U.P.) 2. The Divisional Railway Manager, East Central PO & PS Sonepur, Distt. Saran 3. The Divisional Personnel Officer, East Central Railway Sonepur, PO & PS Sonepur, District Saran 4. The General Manager East Central Railway Zonal Office Hajipur, PO & PS Hajipur, Distt. Vaishali 5. The DRM East Central Railway, Samastipur, PO & PS & District Samastipur…………Respondents ----------- 03- 10/11/2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This application has been filed by the petitioner of CWJC no. 10190 of 2009 (Shambhu Sharan Singh v. Union of India & Ors.), for review of the order dated 26.2.2010 (Annexure 1), whereby the writ petition was dismissed. It is stated in this application that, while disposing the writ petition the writ court did not consider the question of payment of post- retirement benefits to the petitioner because he had served the Indian Railways for fifteen years. 2. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. It appears to us that the petitioner had last worked in 1968 and had filed Original Application before the Administrative Tribunal after a lapse of forty years and was, 2 therefore, dismissed. The writ petition has also been dismissed on the same ground. It presents a case of gross laches, negligence and acquiescence. The Tribunal, therefore, did not have the occasion to consider the issues raised in the application before it and, therefore, this Court also did not have the occasion to consider the same. It is a frivolous application and indeed cannot be considered within the narrow scope of review jurisdiction. 3. This review application is accordingly dismissed. ( S K Katriar ) ( Kishore K Mandal ) mrl