THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION No.15163 of 2009 ORAL ORDER : (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R.Varma) Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Assistant Government Pleader, representing the learned Advocate General, appearing for the respondent. 2. This Writ of Habeas Corpus is filed by the petitioner seeking to direct the respondents to produce his sons viz., (1) Shaik Ali, s/o. Janimiya, aged 35 years, (2) Shaik Chand, s/o. Janimiya, aged 33 years, and (3) Mohd. Jahangir, s/o. Janimiya, aged 31 years, residents of H.No.1-38-1910/A, Rasoolpura, Krishna Nagar, Hyderabad, who were forcibly taken away by the police of Medchal Police Station on 24.7.2009, before this Court and set them at liberty, forthwith. 3. A counter affidavit has been filed by the Inspector of Police, Medchal Police Station, Ranga Reddy District, the fourth respondent herein, stating that the alleged detenus were apprehended on 29.7.2009 in connection with Crime No.232 of 2009 and produced before the XV Metropolitan Magistrate at Medchal on 30.7.2009, who inturn remanded them to judicial custody. Pursuant to the order of remand passed by the learned Magistrate, the alleged detenus are now lodged at Central Prison, Cherlapally. 4. In view of the said fact, we feel it inexpedient to continue the writ petition any further and the same is liable to be dismissed. However, since it is the specific contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the alleged detenus were forcibly taken away by the police on 24.7.2009, but not on 29.7.2009 as stated in the counter affidavit, the petitioner is at liberty to raise this dispute during the trial before the competent Court. 5. Before parting with the case, we wish to point out that this Court is coming across with situations where, for no reason, the officers like Director General of Police, Secretary to Government, Home Department, etc., are being made parties to the writ petitions unnecessarily, who are not at all connected with the allegations or against whom no relief was sought. In the instant case also, the Principal Secretary to Government, General Administration Department and the Director General and Inspector General of Police had been made as parties to the writ petition and reasons for making them as parties are totally indiscernible. Some sort of responsibility is cast on the persons, who seek a relief like Habeas Corpus, to make the necessary officials only as parties. Therefore, we are of the view that it has become just a matter of routine and the same amounts to abuse of process of law, which kind of practice is to be deprecated by all means. 6. In view of the above, the writ petition deserves to be dismissed with costs. 7. With the above observations, the writ petition is dismissed with costs, at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA _________________________ JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO 04-08-2009 Msr. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION No.15163 of 2009 04-08-2009 (Msr)