IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40693 of 2011 1.Premchand Manjhi, Son of Sidheswar Manghi. 2.Urmila Devi, D/o Kapil Chauhan. Both are resident of Village Chhatihar, P.S. Hisua, District Nawada. -------Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party ----------------- 02/- 21/12/2011 Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioners. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The two petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 342, 494, 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act, are named accused in this complaint case respectively being husband and alleged concubine of husband of the complainant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. Submission on behalf of the petitioners is that that these two petitioners have no relations of any type with each other and petitioner no. 2 is in fact widow of one late Ajay Chouhan of village Kushara and has not performed any other marriage or has any relation with co-petitioner. Further, it is submitted that petitioner no. 1 intends to resume and continue the matrimonial relationship with the complainant, who is his one and only wife and mother of three children born out of wedlock and this petitioner no. 1 has no otherwise relationship with any lady inclusive of petitioner no. 2. To further strengthen his intention, petitioner no. 1 offers to pay a sum of Rs. 800/- (eight hundred only) per month to the complainant by way of interim maintenance, subject to any order on the point by the competent court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of filing such application before the court below, clearly stating such intentions as stated above and begin with the payment by petitioner no. 1 supported with an affidavit specifically denying of having any relationship with petitioner no. 2 and simultaneously another affidavit on behalf of petitioner no. 2 denying any sort of relationship with petitioner no. 1 as submitted here, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Complaint Case No. 670 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition to petitioner no. 1, namely, Premchand Manjhi to remain physically present before the court below till disposal of the case and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation or even on single default in payment, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)