IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2008 / 10TH BHADRA 1930 RP.No. 930 of 2008(T) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.9196/2008 Dated 24/07/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER : PETITIONER ----------------- K.G.VARGHESE, ALIAS BABY S/O.GEORGE, KOTTAYIL HOUSE THRIKKALATHUR PO., ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.SHAJI JOSEPH RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------- 1. FEDERAL BANK LTD. ALWAYE, KEEZHILLAM BRANCH, REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. 2. DEBT RECOVERY OFFICER DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAKULAM. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.A.ANTONY FOR R1 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. ================================== R.P.No.930 of 2008 in W.P.(C)No.9196 of 2008 ================================== Dated this the 1st day of September, 2008. ORDER The only plea raised in the writ petition filed by this petitioner was that he was entitled to the benefit of an Agricultural Debt Relief Scheme. That issue was found against. This Review Petition is filed on the basis of Ext.R1(a). However, that is not a matter raised, argued or agitated in the writ petition. Any One Time Settlement on the basis of any provision that is binding on the first respondent, a scheduled bank, is a matter that the petitioner has to work out before the bank or any authority concerned. This R.P. does not call for any review of the judgment already issued. This review petition is dismissed without prejudice to the contentions, which are not touched RP930/08 -:2:- in the writ petition. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. sl.