BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Thursday, the Second day of November Two Thousand and Seventeen PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU CRP(MD) No.241 of 2006 Pappa @ Mariammal W/o. Rathinam Pillai ... Petitioner/Appellant/Tenant Vs. 1.Chinnadurai S/o. Sundaram 2.M.Marimuthu S/o.M.S.Muthusamy 3.M.Chockalingam S/o.M.Marimuthu 4.M.Maheswaran S/o. M.Chockalingam 5.R.Arumugam S/o. Rathinam Pillai(Died) Line Street, Taluk Officer Road, Dindigul Town. (R5 is died, vide Memo in USR.3087/17 dated.10.07.2017, vide Court order dated 04.07.2017, made in CRP(MD).No. 241/2006 by TRNJ) 6.Mariyayee @ Mariammal W/o. Late M.S.Sundaram 7.Meenakshi W/o. Late.M.S.Muthusamy 8.Nagalakshmi D/o. Late M.S.Muthusamy 9.Meenakshi D/o.Late M.S.Muthusamy 10. Pappathi W/o. Late S.Mahendran 11.Minor. Marimuthu S/o. Late S.Mahendran, aged 16 years, 23-B, Line Street, Taluk Office Road, Dindigul Town. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 12.Minor. Manikandan S/o. Late S.Mahendran, aged 11 years, 23-B, Line Street, Taluk Office Road, Dindigul Town. 12.Minor. Selvarani D/o. Late S.Mahendran, aged 17 years, 23-B, Line Street, Taluk Office Road, Dindigul Town. ... Respondents/Respondents/ Landlords 1 to 13 (Minors Represented through their mother and gurardian 10th respondent). Prayer in CRP(MD).No.241/2006: Civil Revision Petition filed under Secion 25(1) of Tamil Nadu buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 praying this Hon'ble Court against the Order passed by the Rent Control Appellate Authority (Principal Subordinate Judge), Dindigul) on 07.10.2005 in R.C.A.No.8 of 1997. ORDER : This petition coming on for hearing on this day, upon perusing the affidavit and material papers filed, and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.L.SUBRAMANI, Advocate for the Petitioner, and of Mr.R.SUNDAR, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.1,6,10, this Court made the following order: The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that this Court, in the earlier occasion, has perused the records and found that the application in I.A.No.47 of 2004 has not been sent and therefore, directed the learned counsel for the petitioner to present a copy application before the lower Court. But the lower Court has stated that the records have already been sent to the High Court and again returned. 2. Hence, the Registry is directed to call for report from the Rent Control Appellate Authority (Principal Subordinate Judge), Dindigul. 3. Post the matter on 24.11.2017. sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ TO THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE, RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY, DINDIGUL. ORDER DATED :02/11/2017 HEARING DATE :24/11/2017 ORDER CRP(MD) No.241 of 2006 AE/MR KKR/SAR1/07.11.2017/3P/2C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/