IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 807 of 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1111 OF 2006 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.807 OF 2006 Shri Chandrashekhar Singh .. Appellant versus Miss Pallavi H. Patil & Anr. .. Respondents ... Mr.D.G. Rangras for the appellant. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 27th November 200 DATED : 27th November 200 DATED : 27th November 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Appeal is admitted. 2. I however do not think that this is a fit case for grant of a stay to the impugned order. Respondents filed a suit for specific performance. The appellant objected to the jurisdiction of the court alleging that City Civil Court had no pecuniary jurisdiction. The City Civil Court held that it had the jurisdiction. City Civil Court can therefore proceed with the hearing of the suit in the usual course. However the final decision would always be subject to the decision of this appeal. With this observation, civil application is dismissed. (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J)