^ HI6H COURT OT CHHATn56ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.fS^ No. 1439 of 2007 Petitioner Tarun Singh Rathore, S/o Siri Meghnnth Rathore, aged about 39 years, Working as Assistont Taicher, 6ovt. Primary School- Nonbirra, Distt. - Janjgir-Champa (C.6.) Versus State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary bepartmentof School Education t>.K.S. Bhawan, Manlralaya Raipur (C.6.) 2. Tne District Education Officer, Distt. - Bi!aspur (C.&) 3. AssistantCommissioner, Trlbal Welfcre Department Korba (C.6.) \^ Block-Korba, Kartala Katghora Distt-.-Korba (C.5.) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish'K. Agnihotri, J Present: AAr. Amit Sharma, Advocute for the petitioner. AAr. Vinay Pandey, Panel Lawyer for respondents/State. >th (Passed on this 13" &ay of March, 2007) -/ 1. The petitioner was appointed vide order dated 05.11.1988 (Annexure P/l) as Assistant Teacher on fixed pa/ sca!e of Rs. 300/-. After comptetion of one year probation, he wus granted regular pay scale of Rs. 975-1650/-. 2. Le.o.rned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether, the petitioner is entitled to regulca* pay sccte w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, JabaSpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 hukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & others), wrfierein it wos held that the similarly situated teachers are entitied to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken-up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Speciat Leave Petition (Civi!) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed reme Court upholdina the decision of the Tribuna! to the effect tiiat the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are ^- entitled to regular pay scale from date of initia! appointment. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submits that this Court, wrfiile considering the sa.me issue in Sushil Tiwari A others Vs. State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & others (W.P. (5) No.5976 of 2006) by order dated 7-11-2006, has grcnted regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initia! appointment. Learned counset appearing for the parties Jointly submit that this case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Sushii Tiwari & others Vs. State (5ovt. of Chhattisgarh &. others (Supra). 6. In view of that this petition is allowad in the same terms. No order 03 t0 COStS. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subhash