IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4651 OF 2008 Jankubai Chikate ..vs.. Vijaykumar Sahu ================================= CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE:23.10.2008 Heard Advocate Badhe for petitioner and Advocate Rao for respondent no.1 and 2. Advocate Badhe contends that though the petitioner is even today in possession, without issuing any notice to him in execution, only on the basis of paper work it has been shown that the petitioner has been dispossessed. He states that taking advantage of this paper work now really the petitioner can be dispossessed and therefore grant of interim relief as prayed for was essential. I find that execution proceedings in which the alleged paper work has been done is the right forum for making this grievance. Advocate Badhe states that these steps are already taken and further states that the complaint on administrative side is also made to learned P.D.J. In these circumstances, I do not find anything wrong with the conclusions reached by lower courts. Liberty to petitioner to move appropriate application in execution proceedings. Present petition is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE smp.