-1- bpk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 345 of 2008 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 397 of 2007 Mehul Trivedi : Petitioner v/s 1. Niranjan Gordhandas Nasta 2. The State of Maharashtra : Respondents None for the applicant Miss S.V. Gajre APP Shri Niranjan Mundargi Advocate for respondents Coram : A.S. Oka,J. Date : 16.4.2009 P.C. . None for the applicant. Shri Mundargi appearing for the first respondent states that he has not been served with a copy of this application. . By order dated 30th June 2008 which is passed on the basis of minutes of the order tendered in the court signed by the applicant and first respondent, the revision application has been disposed of. The prayer in this application is for allowing the applicant to deposit a sum of Rs. 1 lakh which was to be deposited within a period of four weeks from 30th -2- June 2008. The applicant has annexed to this application a true copy of minutes of the order tendered in the criminal revision application. Perusal of the original minutes of the order on the record of the Criminal revision application shows that the copy annexed to this application is not in conformity with the original minutes of the order tendered on record. In the original minutes of order, at the end of paragraph 5 thereof, there is a handwritten addition made recording that in the event the amount of Rs. 1 lakh is not deposited, the compounding of offence order will be set aside and conviction and sentence of the applicant will be revived. This important addition made in the original minutes of order accepted by this court does not find place in the so called true copy of the minutes of order annexed to the application. This aspect will have to be viewed very seriously. . Application is rejected. In view of clause 5 of the minutes of order, the criminal revision application shall be placed on board on 9th June 2009 under caption of ’direction’. (A.S. Oka,J.)