WWW; WWW W‘Drarng 3*? :trru We? fEramg? g Ir. 3 mg. Tm/ qoq g ‘ §u§5JT 7" namla .. .. . ifs" 3mm 331‘;T??T 3533? TR €‘TEE?’ @WT/ 72a gra‘aa 3mm gim’Wa mm? ”Fa. sng? war :3 2 mgv, T’Efrzr W QW? 115a v fGraT aéawf’r ga'w $ am%’, ”mm? gafm 91'. 3 Fm; éo far, 2W“ 13331" wag? $3 {gang fmxi: :__:_____ . . . . £ / J ‘ xg/ LVW/ CD Efrm‘T §w§£ yaw rrFFi W3 fafé$aa gram 13* 3! Hm, il 58“ J2. EAEmT gum 3y 13 avsi ®$ “,3. ma ygrq, 3g m mi \w‘.§y $¢gx@@:A (lg/q. a"&:§ gram, 3g 7 mi girE’Egm’ 93'. 2 %r L; 3m) Fat) 'ftrWH i:,..-"$Q¢f egg‘ifcek yum gTEEq? 'qs 2 ‘?—r u sEfema Em War @f‘ma‘? wEé gram,‘ 9-f $25? war faam‘T 31W WT, 21m Er aaw‘m mmrr‘m‘t faa-r H‘s‘mgfa Ls. éa‘aa' gum 3mg 60 mi k s. 9%:1a? aim yam ErfT‘-‘a' £83m yam mg 55 mi wm' 5 Era: 6 f‘amfr ym‘ WT amn- a agabm' WWW fawn- ngmga 3 5.31. mwTEDr—m V ii§¥§%g§%—I am- 2 x ' :44, yam "FFfé' am? 3W0 Ziaaqm feif‘e“ f; %{TW, mg 2n mi f‘wnfr E5mbrrm' wag? 3 are? amp" g ——2—- ‘ M @ _.2.. 'gx._ (i: wim‘ar gm am? W glam? ’f‘é€ Hm? f$ ’Faa'm‘? ma“r arian’gi‘T Wag? WWI gag fwm mg? g mg? Emu? g' WW 3{rrw’fa am I7? a?€% E-ac’rwr w 1988 .— mmm‘a ti$ mfWwa I36? géxiar mar afawm Hamgfa 3 awn g :zm‘ Em yawn yini’ai 5E/2000 ‘12? rn-f‘m ww’ fhafr‘m 127‘ V2003 % wag $cr°ra am’w Wma ai’35,uoo=oo wif am am 3&3? am. . ”£3, IN] ;f‘ ‘biw:§n¢w‘m§uw‘% mmxi Em 34 @ $$m§ mg. mam,Emmg N§§§ wméwwmmy“ wagqmw ggma qg hwmmw mEd.3mg” mmmma§$m§§ wgmanygw mam§§ . Mmmgmm waduagwg %agumaw~.$.am\§$ g,aggw ® ®/ .«Eum Na?W§ §wm£ §m $ @3 . wmmawwgwwwawma «Wm» .gawmmma wwmm§~§§ §§« Wwawaagm ’ $§ COUQE OF CHHA! TISGARH AT BILA§EQB - ANO44 4 The Ltd. National Insurance Cofnpany others. Bagdeyee Pradhan and Versus RE$PONDENTS : Smt. APPLICANTS \3\4~ APPEAL U/S 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT 1988 E: Hon‘ble shri LM. Quddusi W & Hon’ble Shri N.K. A arwai JJ. Present : Shri Shreekumar Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Shri Shri Anand Vivek Rathore, Kumar Gupta, counsel counsel for the for respondents. the appenant. ORAL ORDER x (Passed on 04‘“ day of Octobeé,’ 2010 The instant appeat appeltant/tnsurance Company dated 12-11 has been preferred by the against the impugned award -2003 passed by First Additionai Motor Accident Ciaims Tribunat, Mahasamund (for short ‘the Tribunai’) in ciaim case No.58/2000. 2. Brief facts of the case are that on 29-05-2000, Minketan Pradhan (since deceased) whiie traveiii registration No. MP. 23- ng in the Jeep bearing D/0989 from Raipur to his native village, which was driven by respondent No.1, near village Chendipa the said jeep while overtaking the truck, dashed with another Truck bearing registration No. W.B. 33-2034, rashty and negligently and pursuant to said accident, the deceased/Minketan succumbed to the injuries sustained in the said accident. 3. The claimants, unfortunate parents, widow and minor children, preferred an application before the Tribunal concerned. under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, claiming compensation to the tune of Rs. 18,25,000/- deceased in the said accident. forthe death of the m ) 4. Learned Tribunal on a close scrutiny of the evidence, material placed on record and submissions made by the parties, awarded a sum of Rs.6,85,400/— as compensation against the non-applicants No. ito 3 along with interest @ 7% per annum from the date of the application tiil its payment. 5.1 We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and also perused the records of the Tribunal. 6.‘ Learned counsel appearing for the appellant/insurance Company has submitted that the driver of the offending vehicle was not having any effective and valid driving licence but though in the written statement, so many pleas including that plea was taken but no evidence has been adduced by the appellant in support of its plea. The burden of proof that the driver was not having effective and valid driving licence was on the insurance Company. The appellant/insurance Company has failed to prove the same, therefore, this ground is not sustainable in the eye of law. 7. No other points have been raised. 8. in the result, the appeal fails and is hereby dismissed. No ‘s order asto costs. _ ‘i Sd/— sdj_ l I.M.Qudd“5‘ N. K. Agarwal Judge a Judgé