IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.12210/2008 Decided on:25.10.2010 _____________________________________________ Meena Kumari. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. R.D. Kaundal, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. P.M.Negi, Dy. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. Advocate General. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). In sequel to order dated 6.10.2010 passed by this Court, Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General has placed on record the copy of letter dated 23.10.2010. It is evident from the contents of letter that the case of the petitioner’s husband for re-engagement shall be considered and he will be permitted to discharge his duties till the date of his superannuation. It has also come that petitioner shall be assigned the duties suitable to him. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 2. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the respondents to re-engage the petitioner’s husband within a period of two weeks from today. The period between his dis- engagement and engagement shall be counted for all intents and purposes, including seniority, pensionary/retiral benefits etc. It is made clear by way of abundant precaution that since the petitioner’s husband is totally blind, he shall be assigned light duties. The gist of the order has been noted down by Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and the same shall be conveyed to the authorities concerned within reasonable period. 3. In view of above directions, the petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 25.10.2010 *awasthi*