L. ^..^...^^&SSiSSt:.•SSaS&s^StisiasSKSs&wasseaiaissseaSK - -^•.': c<ll , c.-.. <.. ^. . \J J -.... ^.- ^'.M IN THE HIGH ©OURT GF JUI3ICATURE AT JABALPUB WoP, N0^? ^]-5'^/2000 3tefeE©TyEesiLtdft K<,Ko R^ad^ Raipujf xepxoBented tey Area Acaounts Qffiiaer. O O .<». o o O..o PetitioneM: Versus.^ 1«» ^ddLtioaal Commissioae^ Commezaial tax || fiaipu^: 2:^ &©sistan-b ComHiissioaex Commeraial Tax^ Saipur •3<» S-fea-te of Madhiya Pzadesh t-hrough Secre-bajcy Vanijiyik Kaz Vibi-iag Vailabti Bhawan^ BhiopaL o«• »o oo •JRespQndeats: ^TITION UNDEK ARTIGLE 226/227 ©FTHE CONSTITUTIQN O? INDIA .^'^ -^ M3i HTGH COURT OF CHHAITISCTARH AT BIIA8PUR PETITIONER WRfT PETITION No. 3275 of2000 Melro Twes Ltd. RESPONDENTS VER8U8 Additioiial Comjiiissioner, Coiriiiiereial Tax, Raipur & Ouiers. PETmON UNDER AETICLE 226/227 GF IIIE CONSTmjnON' OF IND-IA 8B: Hon9b1e Shri Satish K. Agnihotri,.?. Present: None for the petitioiier, Sliri Arun Sao^ Gove.oiiTi^iil Advocaie for ilie Slate. O RD E R (Passed on 14<A day ofNovember, 2011) The matter is called for hearing Iwice, None appears nor is a-ny representation ma.de on behalf' of the petit.ioner. The petitioner riiay not be mterested in pursumgthe matter. Tn view of the above, the is dismissed fbr wa.nt of prosecution, Registry is directed to send a eopy of this order. to tlie pet.itioner, forthwith. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amii