IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WVMP.Nos.408 & 567 of 2008 AND WRIT PETITION No.2372 of 2008 Between: T. Gurcharanam & another. … Petitioners AND Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Currimbhoy Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri Y.V. Ravi Prasad Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri S.V. Ramana This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WVMP.Nos.408 & 567 of 2008 AND WRIT PETITION No.2372 of 2008 ORDER:- WVMP.Nos.408 and 567 of 2008 are filed by respondent Nos. 2 and 1 respectively to vacate order dated 07.02.2008 passed in WPMP.No.3045 of 2008 in WP.No.2372 of 2008. At the hearing, there is no representation for the applicants in the vacate stay applications. Heard Sri Y.V. Ravi Prasad for non-applicant Nos.1 and 2 – writ petitioners and Sri S.V. Ramana, learned Standing Counsel for non-applicant No.3 – respondent No.1. The main writ petition is filed to restrain respondent No.1 in the writ petition from proceeding further in pursuance of lease deed dated 28.09.2007. This Court on 07.02.2008 directed status quo to be maintained as on the date of passing of the order with reference to the land in question. Sri Y.V. Ravi Prasad, learned counsel for non-applicant Nos.1 and 2 – writ petitioners produced a copy of order dated 11.03.2008 passed in ASMP.No.42 of 2008 in AS.No.402 of 2007, wherein this Court granted temporary injunction restraining respondent No.2 in the writ petition and others from doing any acts of waste and damage including the cutting of existing trees on the land and leasing out the same to the third parties or making any constructions on it. Learned counsel says that in view of the abovementioned order passed by this Court, no further orders in this writ petition are required to be passed. In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.3045 and WVMP.Nos.408 and 567 of 2008 are dismissed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 19.03.2008 ES