BK8S8iBBB!IB18??SSI'Msff'w:?s%%?%^S^':':;^ •gllBMIIBNSJB;3fiS*SIR£^%';::%::;y{^^':.':y T;:. 2> ;,: • . • OTB TrT^-fi 9 vcn^TTy TT«-p4* a-ftlS-Tn- T ^Slfrff rTWt5.>I. - 3fY»'?• ^ -~—_——_5fi)^ ^M^(^^\ :^TTTO ti5Ty'|Ug, 3TT. ti^iBTn gmrT1^, mTVW -flT&W 3TTH (TOW 50^, r'1^1 dl - *^''l4'*ll STrTl-fl | | g;WT^t aTWT ^T TTH, <1^B'|r|ET?7T HWT' 5-ar. Mf^sg? <7 sw lli ^i^ liBi "T^:J:i' 'fesys 3f:TT^15WT I.BTFftWI? rTHR, ¥TrT?rftTer. TW flTTOT 'f^TiT, wrrm ^. ^. w. a-w q, TT^?' 5. ^. z. a'En'Ffgi, ?fT9f -frre°T, riitTn'-iTFiq rPlgT 5. ^T. 3. fWTT -frTBT 3TftWT?^, mTgT !?.»T. yrSs^ <TX 3?Fi4ri En-rr 19 % cT.grrT sft? srfygwn- 1995 °'E -ut HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (s\ No. 4884of3DQ5 Ptetitioner : ' Prashant Deshpandey Versus Respoadents ; StateofChliattMgarh&ofhers Sin^e Bench: Hon'bte Mr. Justice SaUsli K. AgaUiotrl. <» :seufc Shri Maaoj Paiaujpe, Advocate for the Pctitioner. ShriV.V.S. Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General with Sint. Anju Ahuja, Govt Advocate for the State/respondcnts. Mi' l;[i 1 : 'i ORDER (2nd November, 2006) The petitioner is workmg as Assistaat Teacher in the govenunent schools. In fhc course of her services as Assistant Teacher, the petitioner has obtaincd B. Ed. exanumation certificate on her own expcnses before 1.3.1999 on 14.07.1992 fix>m Barkatullah Vishwavidyalaya, Bhopal (Annexure A-2). According to leamed counsel for fhe petitioner, the petitioner is entifled to two advance increinents in view of fhe decisioa of ttus Court in the case of Yashwant Kujnar Bharad.waj Vs. Munrcipal Corporatton. Dm^ and anothcr {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}. This Court in thc case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg aad another (Supre^, came to fhe conclusion fhat the teachers, who had obtained B. Ed./B.T.I. Exainination Certificate on thcir own expenses, are coyered by the circular dated 24.12.98 issued by ftie State Govenunent of Madhya Pradesh. Further in'the niatter of Smfc Manoiaina Shrivastava Vs. State of M.P. and others { 2000 (1) M.P.L.S.R. 136 } thc Madhya Pradesh State Admuustrative Tribunal, Gwalior Bench, while consMlering the cucular dated 1.3.1999 wherein, it is provided that the Assistaat Tcacheis, who have acquired B. Ed. degree at fhcir owu cost between 23.10.1964 and 7.5.1973 shaU be eatifted to two advance iacrem.ents, reUed on decision ia the case of Rakesh r~ -r : c^ Kumar Shrivastava Vs. State ofM.P. & others passed in O.A. No. 1632/99, decided oa 12.10.1999 wherein it is observed that the circular dated 1.3.1999 cannot be made appUcable retrospectively. Thus, a tcacher, inay be Assistaut Teacher, who has obtained B. Ed. degree before 1.3.1999 is entitled to two advance incremeD.ts. £? It is pointed out by leanued counsel appeariug for the petitioners that the theu State of Madhya Pradesh had filed a Special Leave Petition against the orders passed by fhe Tribunal and the HonTafc Supreme Court dismissed Special Leave Petition No. 1999/2000 filed against fh.e order of the Tribuaal. Therefore, fhe direction to the effect that the circiilar dated 1.3.1999 caxuiot be made applicable retrospectively, passed by the Tribunal, becomes final and fhe sauie shall be appUcable to aU the Assistaat Teachers who have obtaiaed B. Ed. examination certificate before 1.3.1999. It is further substantiated by a circular dated 17.10.2003 issued by fhe present State of Madhya Piadesh whereia the circular ckarly states about the decision ofthe Supreiue Court. Leamed couusel for the petitfoners furfher submits that the facts and questiou of law iuvolved in the present case are squarely covered by decision of this Court iu the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Muuicipal Corporation, Duig aud another (Supra), to which leamed couiisel appearing for the respondents fairly concedes and agrees wifh the averiuent m.ade by leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitmner. Subhash Accordingly, ftie writ petition is allowed in terms of fhe order passed iu the case of Yashwant Kiunar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporadon, Durg aud auother (Supra), subject to veiiGcation of the fact as to whether fhe petitioner has acquired B. Ed. Examinatiou Certificate on her owu expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 aud 1.3.1999 and further whetih.er she has been paid two advaace iacreinents or not No order as to costs. Sd/- 'atish K. Agnihotri Judge