IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22628 of 1999 Between: Ch.Bhaskar Rao, S/o. Ch.Musalaiah R/o. Ponnur, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The A.P.S.R.T.C. Rep by its Vice Chairman & Managing Director, Hyerabad. 2 The Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Guntur Region, Guntur District. 3 The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Ponnur Depot, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in not regularising the services of the petitioner from the date of initial appointment as illegal, unjust, contrary to law, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Articles 14,16 & 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the Respondents to regularise the services of the petitioner from the date of initial appointment with all consequential beneﬁts and to pass such further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.G.RAVIKANTH (Not present) Counsel for the Respondents: MR.C.PRAKASH REDDY The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.22628 of 1999 ORDER: As there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 26.08.2008, the writ petition was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter is taken up, none appears for the petitioner and there is no representation. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. _________________________ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY 27th August, 2008 IBL