IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17788 of 2009 RAJEEV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 30.6.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Prayer is for regular bail in the present application on behalf of the petitioner who is an accused under sections 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code arising out of Fatuha P.S. Case No. 87 of 2009. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that even according to the statement made by the victim under section 164 of the Cr. P. C. the primary role has been played by one Amrendra kumar @ Pintu who has already been allowed bail by a Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 19904 of 2009. Petitioner has been made an accused but no substantive role has been assigned may be besides extending some logistic support. In the f acts and circumstances of the case and in view of the fact that co-accused has been enlarged on bail, let the petitioner, namely, Rajeev Kumar Jha, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M, Patnacity, Patna in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 87 of 2009. One of the sureties will be executed by the close relative of the petitioner. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)