1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2371 OF 2011 Sambhaji Anand Patil Vs. State of Mah.& anr Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr. S.R.Ganbavale, for the Petitioner. Mr A.I.Patel, AGP, for respondent no.1. Mrs A.R.S Baxi for respondent nos 2 and 3. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE AND K.K.TATED, JJ. DATE : 11/11/2011 PC: Heard learned counsel for the parties. At the outset, learned counsel for respondent no.2 invited our attention to their affidavit wherein a categoric statement has been made that the appointment to the post of Jr. Technician has already been made and in view thereof this writ petition has become infructuous. Having confronted with this, learned counsel for the petitioner could not and did not dispute the statement T 2 made on affidavit by the respondents. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. It is needless to mention that this shall not preclude the petitioner from challenging the appointment made, if he so desires. (K.K.TATED, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) 3