In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … C.R. No. 1081 of 2008 Date of decision: March 16,2009 Hari Singh ..Petitioner Versus Zile Singh and others ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr. Samir Rathore, Advocate for the Petitioner. ... Rakesh Kumar Garg,J.(Oral) This is plaintiff's revision petition challenging the order dated 14.1.2009 passed by the Civil Judge(Senior Division), Kaithal, whereby application filed by the defendant under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. has been allowed and the plaintiff has been ordered to pay ad -valorem court fee on the suit for the reliefs claimed. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that on the last date of hearing, the petitioner/plaintiff has affixed the court fee on the plaint as directed by the trial Court vide order dated 14.1.2009. However, it is the contention of the petitioner that since the petitioner is disputing his liability to pay the ad-valorem court fee, the issue in hand be decided. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. I deem it appropriate that on the pleadings of the parties, let the trial court frame a proper issue with regard to the court fee payable on the plaint and decide the same in accordance with law. This order shall be without prejudice to the rights of the parties. In view of the above, Civil Revision is disposed of. March 16, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE