IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.471 of 2009 Siya Devi, wife of late Vedanand Das, resident of Village- Persando, P.S. Hasweli Kharagpur, District- Munger. ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar, through the Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The State of West Bengal, through the Secretary, Home Department, Govt. of West Bengal. 3. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Director General of Police West Bengal, Kolkata. 5. The Superintendent of Police, Munger. 6. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Kolkata (relating to Lalbazar Police Station, Kolkata). 7. The Officer in-Charge, Sangrampur (Tetiya Bamber) Police Station, Tetra Bambar, Sangrampur. 8. The Officer-in-Charge, Lal Bazar Police Station, Kolkata. ... Respondents. ----------- 07- 1.12.2009 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Heard Mr. Shashikant Singh, learned Assistant Counsel to Government Advocate No.6 for respondent nos.1, 3, 5, and 7, as well as Mr. Satya Deo Kumar for the remaining respondents. It is alleged in the writ petition that the petitioner’s son, namely, Vikas Das was arrested on 7.4.2009 by the Lal Bazar Police headed by the raiding team from City College 102/1, Raja Mohan Sarni, Kolkata-9. It is further stated in the writ petition that Vikas Das was forwarded to the Munger jail under Sangrampur (Tetia Bamber) 2 P.S. Case No.48/07, but he is traceless. It is, therefore, prayed that a writ of habeas corpus may be issued to the respondent authorities for production of the petitioner’s son. 2. The authorities of the West Bengal Government have placed on record their counter affidavit, wherein it is stated that no person of the name of Vikas Das, son of late Veda Nand Das, was arrested by the Lal Bazar Police on 7.4.2009. Therefore, no question of forwarding him to the Munger Jail arises. The authorities of the Bihar Government have placed on record their counter affidavit, wherein it is stated that no such person was forwarded by the West Bengal police. It thus appears to us that the petitioner has filed this writ petition without proper verification of facts. We do not find any material to proceed further in the matter. 3. The writ petition is dismissed. (S K Katriar, J.) (Kishore K. Mandal, J.) S.K.Pathak/