1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1908 OF 2006 Shri Milan Banerjee .. Petitioner. Vs. M/s.Auro Laboratories Ltd. and others. .. Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1909 OF 2006 Shri Milan Banerjee .. Petitioner. Vs. M/s.Auro Laboratories Ltd. and others. .. Respondents. None for the applicants. Mr.S.V.More A.P.P. for the State. Mr.Lalit S.Pagare for respondent no.1. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2006 DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2006 DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2006 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. In these two applications the applicants have prayed for quashing of the criminal case Nos.741/s/2004 and 759/s/2004 pending on the file of the learned 30th Metropolitan Magistrate’s Court, Kurla. It appears that in all, six such cases are pending before the said Magistrate and in all six cases similar applications with identical prayers under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure were filed in this Court, including the instant two 2 2 2 applications. Out of the six applications, four applications, bearing nos.1514/2006, 1907/2006, 1906/2006 and 1905/2006, reached for hearing on 5th June, 2006 which came to be rejected by recording short reasons vide order dated 5.6.2006. None had appeared for the applicants when all the aforesaid four applications were disposed of. Even today when the instant applications are called out, none appears for the applicants. Interalia, the challenge in the instant applications and the challenge in the four applications disposed of on 5th June, 2006, is similar. In the circumstances these applications are also disposed of in terms of the order dated 5th June, 2006 passed in the aforesaid four applications. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)