1 wp9519.sxw ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9519 OF 2009 Madan Vasant Kamble ...Petitioner vs. Shri Sonya Maruti Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit and others ...Respondents Mr.S.S.Patwardhan for the petitioner Mr.Shrishail Sakhare for respondent no.1 Mr.R.M.Patne, A.G.P for respondent nos.4 and 5 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : OCTOBER 4, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the 1 st respondent and the learned counsel for the 4 th and 5th respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions states that the application for stay/interim relief has not been decided by the 5 th respondent till today and in fact no order has been passed on that application. The averments made in paragraph (5) of the petition show that even application for condonation of delay made by the petitioner has not been decided by the 5 th respondent. 2 In view of the factual situation, writ petition need not be kept pending and the same is disposed of by directing the 5 th respondent to decide the application for condonation of delay within a period of four weeks from the date on which authenticated copy of this order is produced before the 5 th respondent. 3 It will be open for the petitioner to press for 2 wp9519.sxw grant of ad-interim relief on the basis of the application for interim relief made by him. 4 All contentions of the parties on merits are kept open. 5 Writ petition is disposed of. JUDGE