IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8355 of 2007 RAM RAKSHA PRASAD, son of Late Dharmadeo Prasad, resident of Village Karna, P.O. Sewtar, P.S. Hasua, District Nawada, presently living n Kanchanbag, Near Project Girls’ School, Hasua, District Nawada ---Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar, through the Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Vikas Bhawan, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Human Resources Development Department,Vikash Bhawan, Patna. 3. The Director, Primary Education, Vikas Bhawan, Patna. 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Nawada. 5. The Headmaster, Girls’ Middle School, Hasua, Nawada. 6. The District Provident Fund Officer, Nawada. ---Respondents ----------- 7. 3.7.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to non- payment of the dues of leave encashment in full since the authorities have not calculated the leave which he earned during the period 1971 to 1973. Besides the above, it is further submitted that the provident fund dues, which has been paid to the petitioner, is not the correct amount. Besides the statutory interest was not paid on the correct rate on the difference of pay for the period 6th of September, 1971 to 31st of March, 1973. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his grievance against leave encashment, the petitioner proposes to file a representation before the District Superintendent of Education, Nawada (respondent no.4) and further 2 proposes to file a representation before the District Provident Fund Officer, Nawada (respondent no.6) with regard to the grievance regarding payment of the provident fund dues with statutory interest. In case such representations are filed within a period of four weeks from today, the above respondents shall consider the aforesaid respective grievances of the petitioner and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representations. Upon consideration, if the representations are disposed of in favour of the petitioner, the above respondents are directed to pass further necessary orders, so that the unpaid claims of the petitioner could be paid without further delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)