IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 29TH MARCH 2010 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 10571 of 2010(V) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- DIBIN MOHAN, S/O.K. MOHANKUMAR, AGED 22, DEVI VILAS, XVI/203, N.F.GATE, TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SMT.P.A.REZIYA RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT,PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, THENJJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, THENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY ADV. MR.P.C. SASIDHARAN, SC, CALICUT UNIVERSITY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/03/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 10571 of 2010-V - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 29th day of March, 2010. JUDGMENT The petitioner was a student of N.S.S. College of Engineering, Palakkad in B.Tech Electronics & Communication. It was a 4 year course having 8 semesters. The petitioner completed the course and appeared for the 8th semester examination. 2. The petitioner failed for Electronics & Circuits I examination of the third semester. So he appeared for the supplementary examination for the said paper in June 2009. It is the case of the petitioner that when he got information regarding publication of results in the University website, he found that he secured 51 marks for the said subject and has passed in the said paper. On 17.2.2010 when the petitioner was about to take the print out of his mark list from the website, he found his marks for Electronic Circuits as 40 and thus has failed in it. Since the petitioner did not get a satisfactory reply from the University, he applied for revaluation of the said paper on 19.2.2010. Ext.P1 is the copy of the application Ext.P2 is the true copy of the pay in slip evidencing payment of fee for revaluation. Apprehending delay in publication of the revaluation results, this writ wpc 10571/2010 2 petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to publish the results of the revaluation within a time frame. 3. Heard learned Standing Counsel for the University. 4. There will be a direction to the respondents to publish the results of the revaluation applied for by the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, if the application and the fee remitted are otherwise in order. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/