IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5776 of 2005 PROF.SUSHILA DEVI Versus TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY & ORS. ----------- 04/ 21.07.2008 No one appears for the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the University has drawn the attention of this Court to paragraph-4 of the counter affidavit as well as to paragraphs-4 to 8 of the supplementary counter affidavit and has submitted that all lawful and admitted dues have been paid to the petitioner. No body appears on behalf of the petitioner to dispute the contention of the learned counsel for the University. However, it is observed that petitioner will be entitled to file a representation, if any other lawful dues, as claimed by her in this writ application, still remains pending in spite of specific stand of the University. If any grievance of the petitioner remains unredressed beyond two months of the filing of such representation in spite of the averments made in the counter affidavit and supplementary counter affidavit, petitioner shall be entitled to an interest - 2 - at the rate of 12 percent from the date of filing of this writ application on such dues till the date of his payment. With the above observations/directions this writ application is disposed of. ( J. N. Singh, J. ) A.H.