IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 21957 of 2010 Date of Decision: 22.12.2010. Gurmit Kaur --Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion to respondents no.1 to 3 only. Ms. Kavita Arora, A.A.G., Punjab has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioner is resident of village Mianwal Aariyan, Tehsil Shahkot, District Jalandhar and was performing duties of Anganwari Worker in Budhanwal Centre. A new post of Anganwari Worker in the said centre at village Mianwal Aariyan, Tehsil Shahkot, District Jalandhar was advertised. The petitioner applied for her appointment/adjustment against the said post. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent no.4 has been appointed on the said post. The petitioner has alleged some foul play in her appointment. Petitioner made a representation (Annexure P-3) and also served a legal notice (Annexure P-4) in this respect but no decision has been taken thereon till date. CWP. No. 21957 of 2010 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the representation/legal notices served by the petitioner, referred to above. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.3 to take decision on the representation/legal notices served by the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 22.12.2010. lucky