IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 23RD AUGUST 2007 / 1ST BHADRA 1929 WP(C).No. 25630 of 2007(A) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SOMAN SURAJ, S/O. SOMAN, VAZHAPPULLY HOUSE, KAZHIMBRAM, VALAPPAD, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, V.C.JAYA PRAKASH, VAZHAPPALLY HOUSE, VALAPPAD, CHAVAKKAD TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.N.KRISHNANKUTTY PILLAI RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, NATIKA VILLAGE OFFICE, NATIKA, THRISSUR. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, CHAVAKKAD TALUK OFFICE, CHAVAKKAD. 3. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE GOVT.PLEADER, A.G'S OFFICE, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. I.V. PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C)NO.25630 OF 2007 ----------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 23rd DAY OF AUGUST, 2007 JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges Ext.P4 order of the Tahsildar, whereby the petitioner's application for mutation under the Transfer of Registry Rules have been rejected on the ground that there is an attachment by the Court on the property. In so far as the petitioner has got a right of appeal against Ext.P4 as provided under the Transfer of Registry Rules, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition at present. Therefore, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge Ext.P4 in appeal as provided under the Transfer of Registry Rules, this writ petition is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd