IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 11055 of 2008 Between: 1 Smt. Ch.Sreedevi, W/o. Prasad, M.P.P.S., Maipadu, Indukurpeta Mandal, Nellore District. 2 Smt.T. Padmaja, W/o. Venkateswarlu, M.P.P.S., Kammapalem, Jaladanki Mandal, Nellore District. 3 Thota Venkateswrlu, S/o. Late Seshaiah, Z.P.H.S., Chintalapalem of Gattupalli, Jaladanki Mandal, Nellore District. 4 Kumari M.Sailaja, D/o. Hazarathaiah, R/o. D.No.8-26-9A, Kalugolammapeta, Kavali, Nellore District. 5 M.Ramthaiah, S/o. Ramaiah, R/o. Rammurthypeta, kavali, Nellore District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1. The Station House Officer, 4th Town P.S., Nellore, Nellore District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Nellore, Nellore District. 3. Smt. M.Vijayalaxmi , W/o. Sreenivsa Rao, R/o. Flat No.404, Vishwa Residency, Opp: to LIC, CCS Nagar, Dargamitta, Nellore, Nellore District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus or otherwise declaring the FIR in Cr.No.84/2008, dt. 2.4.2008 under Sec.323,448 and 506 of IPC on the file of SHO, 4th Town P.S., Nellore, Nellore District, as arbitrary, illegal, and unconstitutional, violating Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same and issue consequential direction, restraining the Respondents from proceeding further, including arrest of the Petitioners in Pursuance of FIR in Cr.No.84/2008 dt. 2.4.2008 under Sec. 323,448 and 506 of IPC on the file of SHO, 4th Town P.S., Nellore, Nellore District. Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.P.V.KRISHNAIAH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.11055 of 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 25.11.2008 v v