IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.5823 of 2010 1. BALESHWAR RAI son of Chandrika Rai 2. Anil Rai @ Anil Kumar Yadav, son of Krishna Rai 3. Suruj Rai, son of Prabhu Rai 4. Shri Rai son of Nathuni Rai 5. Jagu Rai, son of Ram Briksha Rai 6. Sheojee Rai, son of Ram Balak Rai 7. Laxman Rai, son of Jagu Rai 8. Manoj Rai, son of late Ram Nath Rai Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 04.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 / 109 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel submits that there is a case and counter case. He further submits that the allegation of causing injury by assault is only against other accused persons. Learned counsel further submits that allegation of snatching Rs. 5,000/- against the petitioner Manoj Rai is super addition in nature. He further submits that petitioner no.1 is alleged to have abused and petitioner nos. 4 and 5 have not participated in the alleged assault, even as per allegation. In the circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today before the court below in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case No. 102 of 2009, petitioners 1 to 6 and 8 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of - 2 - Criminal Procedure. So far as prayer for grant of anticipatory bail of petitioner no.-7 is concerned, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to him. His prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)