WPPIL No. 38 of 2011 Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Menka Tripathi, Standing Counsel for the Union of India / respondent No. 1. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Standing Counsel for the State / respondent No. 3. Despite service, effected upon respondent No. 4, no one is appearing on behalf of the said respondent. It has been alleged in the petition that while undertaking construction activity, respondent No. 4 has given a complete goby to its environmental obligations, contained in environmental clearance granted by the Ministry of Environment as a condition precedent for commencement of the work in question. We are giving a further opportunity to respondent No. 4. In the event, on the next date, none appears on behalf of respondent No. 4, we have to proceed on the basis of what has been stated in the petition and shall be constrained to pass an order, directing complete stop of the work in question. List this matter as a fresh case on 29th June, 2011. Let a copy of this order be handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners are directed to serve the same upon respondent No. 4 on or before 21st June, 2011. (Servesh Kr. Gupta, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 15.06.2011 Amit