1 CRA-113-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 113 OF 2011 Shri Santosh Pandharinath Suryawanshi ... Petitioner (Orig. accused) Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Vivek Salunke i/b. Mr. Z.M.Avhad,Advocate, for the petitioner Mrs. V.R.Bhosale, APP, for the respondent No.1 - State. Mr. M.V.Rawool, Advocate, for respondent No.2. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 18th March, 2011. P.C. 1. The petitioner, who is original accused, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in Summary Case No.1139/2004 by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nashik Road and was sentenced to undergo R.I. for six months and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- and also compensation of Rs. 70,000/- to the complainant. Presently, the accused is in jail undergoing the sentence. The respondent No.2, who is the original complainant, is present with his Counsel. Respondent No.2 and the Advocate for the petitioner-accused have filed an application marked "X" compounding the case. It is stated that the respondent No.2/complainant has received whole of the amount of 2 CRA-113-11.sxw compensation.In view of this, the parties are allowed to compound. 2. In the result, the Revision Application is allowed and the conviction and sentence awarded by the trial Court and confirmed by the appellate Court are hereby set aside. The petitioner/accused be released forthwith, if not required in any other case. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)