1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRI. APPLICATION NO. 111 OF 2009 (DHANANJAY DEVCHAND RUDRAKSH VS. STATE OF MAH. THR. PSO CHIKHALI) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Shri V.G.Wankhade, Advocate for applicant. Shri P.D.Kothari, A.P.P. for Respondent. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : MARCH 25, 2009. 1. This is an application for bail by a person accused to have murdered a seventy years' old man. The applicant allegedly had a dispute with the deceased about fodder. The applicant allegedly snatched the milk keetle from the victim and the victim went after the applicant. Thereafter the victim was found dead. The notes of post mortem examination do not reveal any injuries. The Medical Officer reserved opinion to the cause of death. Viscera did not disclose any poison. On histopathology examination, the Medical Officer came to a conclusion that the death may be due to asphyxia. 2 2. In these circumstances, the applicant's being in custody, till the trial is over, is not warranted. The applicant is unlikely to tamper with the evidence, which has been collected. The application is allowed. 3. The applicant be released on furnishing P.R.B. in Rs. Fifty Thousand with solvent surety in the like amount. JUDGE RR.