IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36076 of 2008 CHOTE LAL YADAV & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioners – Mr. Alok Kumar Sinha-1, Adv. Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh, Adv. For the State – Mr. C. Jawahar, A.P.P. --------- 2. 27/8/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to lack of proper information by their Pairvikar, the petitioners could not attend the case and therefore, their bail bonds were cancelled. It is further submitted that they were never informed by the Pairvikar regarding cancellation of their bail bonds while they were engaged in earning their livelihood. Further submission is that out of eight accused persons whose bail bonds were cancelled on same date, two have been granted bail by a Bench of this Court by order dated 14/7/2008 passed in Cr. Misc. Case No. 24327 of 2008. Petitioners are said to be under jail custody, subsequently on their surrender, since 20/5/2008. Learned counsel for the State submits that this is a case of long misusue of privilege of bail. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioners namely, Chote Lal Yadav, Shyam Lal Yadav, Arvind Yadav, Ranjeet Yadav, Sutesh Yadav @ Suresh Prasad and - 2 - Ram Dahin Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-I, Nawada, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 291 of 2005 arising out of Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 31 of 1996 with the condition that one of the bailors must be employee of Government or Semi Government organisation and petitioners will not absent themselves from the case/trial on any occasion except on being permitted by the court in accordance with law. S.Ali (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)