IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 1060 of 2011. Date of Decision : 5.9.2011. Ravinder alias Sanjeev Kumar ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & another ......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Ajit Sihag, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Satyavir Singh Yadav, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) Challenge is to the order dated April 6th, 2011 passed by Sessions Judge, Bhiwani whereby she directed the competent authority (Juvenile Justice Board) to hold an inquiry under Section 7(2) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (for short 'the Act') with regard to question of juvenility of the petitioner who is facing trial in case bearing First Information Report No. 145 dated April 14th, 2010 under Sections 304-B and 498- A read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code registered in Police Station Tosham, District Bhiwani. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not address any argument to assail the judgment of the Court below. Otherwise too, the order was passed in view of the provisions of Section 7(2) of the Act which provides that the competent authority to which the proceeding is forwarded under sub-section (1) of Section 7, shall hold the inquiry as if the juvenile or the child had originally been brought before it. 3. Learned State counsel has stated that proceedings before the Juvenile Justice Board are pending. Evidence on the juvenility of the petitioner is being led by the parties. The Juvenile Justice Board has yet not decided as to whether petitioner is juvenile or not. Criminal Revision No. 1060 of 2011 (2) 4. In view of above, no illegality or irregularity is discernible in the impugned order. Hence, the revision is dismissed. 5.9.2011. (NAWAB SINGH) SN JUDGE