IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9915 of 2011 1. Laddu Lal Mahto, Son of Ram Charitra Mahto. 2. Ram Jatan Mahto, Son of Ram Charitra Mahto. 3. Krishna Deo Mahto, Son of Ghuran Mahto. All resident of village-Dangibari, P.O.-Patharia, P.S.-Galgalia, District- Kishanganj. –Petitioners. VERSUS 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The District Collector, Kishanganj, District-Kishanganj. 3. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Kishanganj, District-Kishanganj. 4. Dilip Kumar Singh. 5. Goutam Kumar Singh. 6. Satya Dev Singh. 7. Sanjay Kumar Singh. 8. Binay Kumar Singh. 9. Anamika Kumari. 10. Subeda Devi. Respondent Nos.4 to 8 are sons, Respondent No.9 is daughter and Respondent No.10 is the wife of Late Jai Ram Singh, all residents of village-Nawabganj (Manihari), P.O. & P.s.-Manihari, District-Katihar, at present residing at village-Dangibari, P.S.-Galgalia, District-Kishanganj. –Respondents. ----------- 02 28.06.2011 By the present application, the petitioners seek to challenge the order dated 23.03.2011 passed by D.C.L.R., Kishanganj in Bataidari Case No.18/2009. The order upon appraisal of facts comes to the conclusion that the petitioners failed to establish their right as tenant under the landlord on relevant applicability of B.T. Act. He has, thus, not chosen to proceed further with conciliation and other aspects. The application was in terms of Section 48E of the Act. In view of the conflicting questions of facts involved and in view of the finding of the authorities that the action has been brought only to pressurize for selling the land at cheap rate, I am not inclined to interfere in this matter. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. Trivedi/ (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)