IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION A.O. NO.917/2008 Ganpat Daji Danawade Petitioner Vs. M/s Parekh Holdings Builders and developers & anr. Respondent Mr.S.A.Pawar,advocate for the petitioner Ms.Preeti Mahjan advocate for respondent CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR,J. DATE : 26th November,2008 P.C. 1] Whether the appellant is entitled to the additional premises or not would depend upon the correctness of the final list prepared by the MHADA. In the final list the entitlement is not granted. Considering the facts of this case it is difficult in a proceeding of this nature to grant the allotment which is the final relief claimed in the suit. Respondent no.1 states that all the allotments have been made and there are no non-allotted premises in the building . 2] It is,however, clarified that the appellant is at liberty to proceed with any other remedy including under the provisions of MHADA Act,1976. 3] With the above clarification the A.O.is dismissed.