Sr. No. 02 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case: CM No. 682/2025 In LPASW No. 177/2009 Sudesh Kumar Gargotra …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Applicant is present in person. V/s Vikram Srivastav, D.G. I.T.B.P and another …. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL SREEDHARAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE ORDER 24.02.2025 01. The applicant insists on arguing the case. This Court has repeatedly offered him assistance from the Legal Services Authority to appoint a competent lawyer who can assist his case. His case has meandered before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at one instance, and thereafter, it has been followed up here before the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh. 02. This Court has been informed that his writ petition, LPA and the review filed therein was also dismissed. 03. Despite, the offer by this Court to assign a lawyer to him, he is neither accepting nor unequivocally denying the requirement of a lawyer. The applicant is not a trained lawyer. He was a former personnel of the Indo-Tibetan Border Police who was served as a Sub-Inspector. He claims that he had unearthed a scam in the year 1988 in Mussoorie and that he was the whistle-blower. 04. His submissions are fractured and are in bits and pieces and do not form a cohesive chain of thoughts. 05. Under the circumstances, list the instant case along with the records of SWP No. 1035/2014, APSWP No. 30/2015, SWP No. 850/2000 and Contempt Petition No. 108-E/2002 on 27.02.2025. 06. The applicant shall prepare the list of dates in a chronological order relating to each of these cases and the stage, if the case is pending or if it has been disposed of, the orders by which they have been disposed of. 07. Let this be done before the next date of hearing. (RAJESH SEKHRI) (ATUL SREEDHARAN) JUDGE JUDGE Jammu 24.02.2025 Renu Renu Bala 2025.02.25 15:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document