1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. L.P.A. No. 325/2011 in WRIT PETITION NO.2761/2003 (D) ( Uttam Jesa Rathod .vs.Yuwak Mandal, Pusad. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 04, 2011 Heard Advocate Shri S.D. Chande for appellant. It is apparent that the first termination on 27.4.1995 is found valid and, therefore, challenge to subsequent termination on 27.4.1999 is found to be infructuous. The learned Single Judge has accordingly disposed of writ petition. We are , therefore, not inclined to interfere in the matter. However, Advocate Shri Chande points out that appellant has later got knowledge and procured a document which shows that there was no resolution by the competent authority for termination of services of the appellant. It is apparent that this cannot be a ground in L.P.A. The learned counsel also points out that in L.P.A. there is a prayer in the alternate. If the remedy of review is available to appellant in law, with 2 liberty to take recourse to that remedy, present L.P.A. is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE halwai