1 Contempt Petition No.201/2006 in Writ Petition No.2818/2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.201 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2818 OF 2006 Dattatrya s/o Manik Munde ... PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri R.P. Bhumkar, Advocate for petitioner – absent Shri D.R. Kale, A.G.P. for respondent No.1. ..... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATED : 6th June, 2011. PER COURT : 1. This contempt petition alleges disobedience of the order dated 24.4.2006, passed by the Division Bench this Court in Writ Petition No.2818/2006. 2. When this matter is called out, none appears for the petitioner. With the assistance of learned A.G.P. for the State, I have carefully perused the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the respondents. Learned A.G.P. invited my attention to the Exhibit R-1 to the affidavit-in-reply filed by respondent No.2 Joint Registrar, 2 Contempt Petition No.201/2006 in Writ Petition No.2818/2006 Cooperative Societies, Latur Division, Latur. From perusal of the said Exhibit R-1, it is abundantly clear that the grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition has been redressed and the entry in the service record about the date of birth of the petitioner has been corrected. The learned A.G.P. submits that the order passed by the Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Latur Division, Latur was in the month of August 2006 i.e. before filing the contempt petition. In the light of above, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt petition. Contempt Petition stands disposed of. Notice stands discharged. ( S.S. SHINDE, J. ) fmp/-cp201.06