IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17284 of 2010 KAMLI KOYARI @ KAMLESHWAR SINGH @ KAMLESHWARI SINGH @ Kamli Choudhary, S/o Late Huro Choudhary. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 23.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner is named in the confessional statement of the co-accused and he has criminal antecedent, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case shall not be bifurcated for purposes of commitment and framing of charge. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)