1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6561 OF 1998 The Chairman, Shree Bhavani, Education Society, Atpadi, Dist. Sangli .... Petitioner vs 1 Shri Maheshkumar Bapusaheb Deshmukh & ors. .... Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr.A. M. Joshi for respondent no.1. Mr.S.D. Rayrikar, AGP for respondents 2 & 4­State. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 23rd April, 2010 P.C.: 1 The matter is called out from final hearing board. 2 The petitioner/management has challenged the impugned order dated 24.07.1998 whereby it was directed to provide continuity of service being permanent employee. It is also directed that if sufficient workload is not available, then respondent no.1 be treated as surplus and absorbed elsewhere as per the direction of the Education Officer, Zilla Parishad, Sangli. 3 While admitting the petition on 17.02.1999 this Court refused to grant any ad­interim relief by recording the statement of respondent no.1 is in service in compliance of the order. 4 The learned counsel for respondent no.1 now makes statement that as 2 respondent no.1 was declared surplus and as directed and observed in the impugned order, he has been absorbed in some other School and now already serving in the School as a Permanent Teacher/employee. He is entitle for all the benefits. 5 In view of above, I see there is no reason to keep this matter pending and there is nothing survives in this Petition as there is no question of any liability of any kind. It is disposed of as infructuous. All points are kept open. 6 Resultantly, the Petition is disposed of as infructuous. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)