IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19196 of 2011 Firoz Mian Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 20.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 25.02.2011 in a case registered under Sections 302, 201/34 of the I.P.C. Petitioner is named in the First Information Report but his name has been given in fardbeyan of the informant only on the basis of suspicion. Subsequently, in course of investigation son and daughter of the informant claimed to have seen the petitioner taking away the deceased and committing the murder of the deceased along with one Wanti Ansari. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that admittedly, the fardbeyan of the informant was recorded on 23.02.2011 at 9.30 A.M. and the deceased had been missing from her house much prior to the recording of fardbeyan of the informant but he did not disclose the name of the petitioner as well as the alleged manner of the occurrence. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Firoz Mian be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial 2 Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Kochas P.S. Case No. 21 of 2011. Kamlesh (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)