THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3005 OF 2009 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S No.128 of 2008 in the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool, against the respondent for recovery of certain amount. The trial of the suit commenced. The petitioner filed photocopies of the relevant documents, stating that originals were misplaced. To receive the same, as secondary evidence, the petitioner filed I.A. No.385 of 2009. The application was ordered by the trial Court on 06-05-2009, on payment of costs of Rs.50/- by the next date. It was also directed that the petitioner shall produce the witness on the next date for cross-examination. The petitioner states that he was at Rajasthan at the relevant point of time and that he could not comply with the conditions. The petitioner filed an application under Section 148 CPC with a prayer to enlarge time. Through order, dated 07-05-2009, the trial Court dismissed the application. Hence, this revision. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Though the respondent served with notice, it did not choose to enter appearance. 3. The trial Court acted totally in a hyper technical manner. The application filed by the petitioner on the next date i.e. on 07-05-2009, for enlargement of time for payment of costs of Rs.50/- and to take other steps, was rejected. It should not be forgotten that the proceedings in the Court cannot be expected to take place with mechanical precession and margin had to be given for certain unforeseen circumstances. 4. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the order under revision is set aside. Consequently, the I.A., filed under Section 148 CPC, shall stand allowed and the petitioner shall be entitled to comply with the conditions imposed in the order, dated 06-05-2009, in I.A. No.385 of 2009 within ten (10) days from today. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J February 01, 2011. Note: Issue CC in three days. B/O. KTL