BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Third day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.9873 of 2011 CHINNAYA : PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THUVARAMKURICHI POLICE STATION, MANAPPARAI TALUK, TRICHY DISTRICT. CRIME NO.160 OF 2011 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.GOPALAMANIKANDAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr. A.RAMAR Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/sole accused apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 332 and 506(ii)I.P.C, in Crime No.160 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was charged under Sections 294(b), 332 and 506(ii)I.P.C, in Crime No.160 of 2011. He further submitted that he is nothing to do with the crime and a false case has been foisted against the petitioner and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that on 29.06.2011 the complainant namely Rajendran lodged a complain before the respondent police stating that regarding the civil dispute in between them the petitioner cutting the tree in the disputed lands that time the complainant prevent the petitioner to cut the tree. Hence, the petitioner using the filthy language and assaulted the de- facto complainant and the investigation is going on and hence he prays for dismissal of this application. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and even though the petitioner was not arrested he neither interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate Manapparai, and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Manapparai, and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. Sd/- 03/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAPPARAI. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THUVARAMKURICHI POLICE STATION, MANAPPARAI TALUK, TRICHY DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. S.GOPALAMANIKANDAN Advocate SR.No.25822 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9873 of 2011 Date :03/08/2011 NSV/5.8.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/