IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPLUR FIRSTAPPEAL' ?G I J 3-bF-20Q6 APPELLANT MAINTIFF /' Hanuman Prasad s/o Chhote Yadav,aged-35 years,R/o Vill.-Kewa Janjgir, Distt.-3anjgir-Champa[CG] Lal RESPONDENTS .<'/' /' DEEENDANTS A" ^^ [ffi(/ .^" ^i9"' VERSUS 1] Khhamman Prasad s/o Muniram '' Yadav,agedabout 55 years R/o Village -Nawapara,AT Present - Jagdalla,Champa,Tahsil-3anJgir, District Janjgir Champa[CG] 2] Arvind kumar Lahmore s/o Bhagwat ^- Pd. aged 24 years R/o-Amoda, Tahsil-Janjgir, District 3anjgir Champa[CG] 3] Satish Kumar s/o Bhagwat Pd. R/o- •^ Amoda, Tahsil-Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa[CG] 4], State of Chhattisgarh ^ Through- The Collector, District. - Janjgir-Champa [CG] g&^- APPEAL U/S OF CIVL PROCEDURE CODE s» ^^ n— g^^^nqT?PT, ^T!1+<'lrf, R|01+iy __£.fl.^^.j&....6>3L..... "WI. 200^ ati^T TSSSK (ipfggqw) •llliSfl.'W h-H^i ?«IT3TR?r *W* Kw TOITWdftff SIltff 24-10-2007 Shri Ravish Verma, counsel ft>r At the request of the iearned weeks' time is granted for removin^ Registry, faiiing which the appeal withoutfurther reference to the Bendh fjsrtheappellant. :ounsel for the appellant, finally, 2 default No.3 pointed out by the Ishal! be liable to be dismissed <*i^fi'i''il-< 'iroff ^f fe^t <fii<si< ^3TfOT3TI^T o Learned counsel for the app|el!ant submitted that fhe defauits . 1 and 2 have been removed. Registrytoveriiy ] _ g^y. Llst the matter after 4 weeks. | j Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge