CR No. 6441 of 2010 -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 6441 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 04.10.2010 M/s Kakkar Steel Forgings & another .......... Petitioners Versus M/s Bawa Industries Limited ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present : Mr. Sudhir Mittal, Advocate for the petitioners. **** VINOD K. SHARMA, J. (ORAL) The petitioners have invoked the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to challenge the order dated 8.9.2010, passed by the learned District Judge, Ropar, vide which application moved by the petitioner for transfer of the case from Ropar to Mohali stands declined. It is not in dispute that initially the suit was filed at Phagwara, and on the application moved by the petitioner before this Court, the case was ordered to be transferred to Ropar. The order was passed by this Court in presence of the parties. The petitioner accepted the transfer of the case from Phagwara to Ropar. The petitioner thereafter moved another application for transferring the case from Ropar to Mohali. The learned District Judge, in view of the specific orders passed by this Court, that the case should be transferred to Ropar declined the application moved by the petitioner. CR No. 6441 of 2010 -2- The learned District Judge also held, that the inconvenience pointed out by the petitioner was only imaginary, as the petitioner was not required to attend the Court on every date of hearing as he was to attend the Court only once or twice. The distance between Mohali and Ropar is not such, which could be considered to be inconvenience for the petitioner to travel. The exercise of discretion by the learned District Judge is not perverse which may call for interference by this Court in exercise of revisional jurisdiction. No merit. Dismissed. 04.10.2010 (VINOD K. SHARMA) 'sp' JUDGE