Crl. Misc. No. M –20631 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- Crl. Misc. No. M –20631 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:- 17.8.2010 Pinki ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present:- Mr. J.S.Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. A.S.Brar, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Gurdev Singh, J (oral) Heard. Learned State counsel requests for adjournment on the ground that the copy of this petition was not furnished to Mr. J.S.Sidhu, Assistant Advocate General, when he accepted the notice on behalf of the State on the previous date. There is no ground for granting the adjournment on the said plea as it is very much apparent from the order dated 30.7.2010 that such a copy was supplied to the learned State counsel and thereafter he had made a request to argue the matter. Even as per the endorsement made on the main petition, such a copy of the petition was received in the office of the Advocate General on 20. 7.2010. It appears that in order to delay the matter the said adjournment is being prayed. This petition has been filed by the petitioner – Pinki under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the grant of regular bail in FIR No. 264 dated 4.10.2008, under Sections 382, 34 IPC ( Section 323 IPC was Crl. Misc. No. M –20631 of 2010 (O&M) -2- added later on) in Police Station Payal, District Ludhiana. The name of the petitioner does not figure in the FIR, which was got registered by Parkash Lal Chabra – complainant against two unknown Hindu gentlemen. Nothing has been placed on the record by the State counsel before this Court in order to show the involvement of the petitioner in this case. The petition is, therefore, accepted. The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. August 17, 2010 (Gurdev Singh) tripti Judge