:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. APPEAL NO.399 OF 2005 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1255 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.1175 OF 2005 Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Limited & anr. .. Appellants v/s. Narsons Pharmaceuticals .. Respondent Mr.Nishad Nadkarni i/by M/s.DSK Legal for the appellants. CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 20th July, 2005 P.C. As it is stated in the affidavit dated 18th July, 2005 that the investigator engaged by the appellants has been making efforts in tracing the new address of the respondent, we grant further time of three weeks to the appellants to supply the correct address of the respondent. 2. The learned counsel for the appellants referred to the order dated 23rd December, 2004 passed by us in Appeal No.671 of 2004 and submitted that similar order be passed here. We are unable to do so since :2: in the affidavit dated 18th July, 2005, mainly it is prayed that time be granted for ascertaining the new address of the respondent. 3. In case the appellants do not supply the correct address of the respondent within the time aforestated, the court may be constrained to discharge the order dated 27.4.2005. 4. Stand over for three weeks. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. LODHA, J.) LODHA, J.) LODHA, J.) (J.P. (J.P. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) DEVADHAR, J.) DEVADHAR, J.)