{1} ca1295410.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12953 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3053 OF 2007 Kum. Pallavi d/o Arun Thakur Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Mr.A.S.Golegaonkar, advocate for applicant. Mr.K.G.Patil, A.G.P. for respondent no.1. Mr.R.P.Phatke, advocate with Mr.Shrishailya S. Deshmukh, Special Counsel for Respondent No.2. CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND R.M.BORDE, JJ. DATE : 06 th December, 2010 PER COURT: This is an application for amendment. Civil Application is allowed. Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. R.M.BORDE B.R.GAVAI JUDGE JUDGE adb/ca1295410 {2} ca1295410.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12954 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3053 OF 2007 Kum. Pallavi d/o Arun Thakur Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Mr.A.S.Golegaonkar, advocate for applicant. Mr.K.G.Patil, A.G.P. for respondent no.1. Mr.R.P.Phatke, advocate with Mr.Shrishailya S. Deshmukh, Special Counsel for Respondent No.2. CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND R.M.BORDE, JJ. DATE : 06 th December, 2010 PER COURT: 1 By way of present Civil Application, the applicant is seeking a direction to Respondents No.3, 4 and 5 not to take any adverse action against the petitioner on the ground of invalidation of her caste claim and for further stay to the decision of the Committee invalidating caste claim of the petitioner. 2 Insofar as prayer for grant of stay to the order of Committee regarding invalidation is concerned, we are not inclined to grant stay to the decision of the Committee and said prayer, therefore, stands rejected. {3} ca1295410.odt 3 However, insofar as protection to the services of petitioner is concerned, we are inclined to grant the same. Respondents No.3, 4 and 5 are directed not to take any adverse action against the petitioner on the ground of invalidation of her tribal claim till the decision of the present petition. It is, however, made clear that petitioner would not be entitled to any promotional benefits on the ground of she belonging to Scheduled Tribe. 4 Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly. R.M.BORDE B.R.GAVAI JUDGE JUDGE adb/ca1295410