CWP No.289/2008 03.03.2008 Present: Mr. K.B. Khajuria, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Lovnesh Kanwar, counsel for respondent No.1. The petitioner-child applied to appear in examination of Class 8th. However, she was not permitted because of the age. The father of the petitioner made representation to the authorities, which has been rejected by an order dated 1st March, 2008, on the ground that the relaxation is only permissible for one year and even if it could have been done, the petitioner-child cannot get benefit of the same. The vires of the rules are not under challenge. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to challenge the rules. Accordingly, liberty is granted. CMPs No.372 & 373 of 2008 Infructuous. ( Jagdish Bhalla ), C.J. March 3, 2008 (sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J.