IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28725 of 2009 GUDDU @ AJIT SINGH SON OF RAMADHAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 18.11.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 328 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that in the first information report itself it has been stated that the alleged Prasad, which was given by the petitioner, has been consumed by the deceased on the permission of the informant despite the fact that there was a threat existing from the side of the petitioner and the statements of the boys, who stated that the petitioner had given a tablet along with Prasad to the deceased, have been taken after three months of the occurrence, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 26.2.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in Nabinagar P.S.case No.39 of 2008, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking 2 that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )