IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 12TH AUGUST 2011 / 21ST SRAVANA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 810 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.22404/2010 Dated 19/07/2010 .................... PETITIONER/ PETITIONER IN W.P.(C) ------------------------------------ K.G.MADHANAKRISHNAN, AGED 59 YEARS, S/O.M.GOVINDAN, (NILAYA,MEENANGADI.P.O, WAYANAD-673591)EXECUTIVE ENGINEER(AT PRESENT SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (GENERAL)W.E.F.20.7.2010 GROUND WATER DEPARTMENT, JALA VIJNANA BHAVAN,AMBALAMUKKU,KOWDIAR.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-3). BY ADV. SRI.K.P.JUSTINE (KARIPAT) RESPONDENT(S): 1ST & 3RD RESPONDENTS IN WP(C) --------------------------------------------- 1. V.J.KURIAN,AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,WATER RESOURCE(G.W.)DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. M.R.RAMESH,AGED 55 YEARS,S/O.RAGHAVAN, DIRECTOR-IN-CHARGE,GROUND WATER DEPARTMENT, JALA VIJNANA BHAVAN,AMBALAMUKKU,KOWDIAR.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-3. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. M.J.RAJASHREE THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Con.Case(C).No. 810 of 2011(S) APPENDIX --------------- PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES ----------------------------------- A II:- CERTIFIED COPY OF the JUDGMENT DATED 19.7.10 IN W.P.C NO.22404/10 OF THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA. A II:- TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DT.2.6.11 SENT BY ADV.K.P.JUSTINE (KAIRPAT) TO THE RESPONDENTS AIII:- TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY NOTICE SENT BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITOIENR'S ADVOCATE DT.4.7.11 AIV: TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(P) NO. 41/20/OWRD DT.20.7.10 ISSUED BY WATER RESOURCES (GROUND WATER) DEARTMENT RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES:NIL TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ----------------------------------------------- Cont.Case(C) No. 810 of 2011 in WP(C)No.22404 of 2010 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT Learned Government Pleader has produced proceedings datd.2.8.2011 issued in compliance with the directions in the judgment. Therefore, the Contempt of Court Case is closed leaving it open to the petitioner to work out his remedies, if he is aggrieved by the aforesaid order. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. rkc