1 crapn2515.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2515 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. S.T. Veer, Advocate for applicant. Mr. Prashant Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 17TH FEBRUARY, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard learned A.P.P. for the applicant-State and learned Counsel for respondents. 2. This is an application for condondation of delay. Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant invited my attention to the contents of the application and submitted that sufficient cause has been demonstrated in the application. Therefore, this application 2 crapn2515.10 may be allowed. 3. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the respondents vehemently opposed the application and submitted that, no sufficient cause has been shown in the application and therefore, delay may not be condoned. 4. Upon hearing Counsel appearing for the parties and upon perusal of the contents of the application and more particularly from Para. Nos. 3 to 8, I am satisfied that sufficient cause has been demonstrated in the application. Hence, the application for condonation of delay is allowed and disposed of. [ S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/feb11/crapn2515.10