IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14817 of 2011 Md.Alam Khan, Son of Late Abdul Aziz Khan, resident of Village-Pateji Bahadur, P.O. Kujwa, P.S. Aaswan, District-Siwan --------Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur 3. The Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur, District-Muzaffarpur 4. The Treasury Officer, Muzaffarpur, District-Muzaffarpur 5. The Accountant General,Bihar,Patna --- Respondents. ---------------------------------- 02 08-09-2011 Heard Sri V.K.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Amrendra Kumar, learned A.C. to Govt. Advocate No.8, who appears on behalf of Respondent nos. 1 to 4 and Sri Ajit Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent no.5/ Accountant General,Bihar,Patna. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 01.01.2003 as Driver-cum- Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police from District Police, Muzaffarpur , has prayed for direction to the Respondents to revise his pension, gratuity and also earned leave in view of the District Order No.1810/2006 issued by the Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur, whereby the Driver-cum- Assistant Sub- Inspector and Driver-cum- Constable were granted pay-scale of Rs.5500-175-9000/- as second A.C.P. in place of Rs.5000/-130- 8000/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the relief sought for in the writ petition, the petitioner has filed number of representations before Respondent no.3. However, no decision has been taken till date. It was submitted that the writ petition may 2 be disposed of with a direction to the Respondent no.3 to take final decision on the representation of the petitioner. In view of the stand taken by learned counsel for the petitioner, there is no need to keep the present writ petition pending The writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Respondent no.3/ the Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur within a period of six weeks from today for the claim raised in the present writ petition. If such representation is filed by the petitioner, the Respondent no.3 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If the Respondent no.3 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order enabling the petitioner to get his revised pay scale. Even in case of refusal, the Respondent no.3 is required to pass speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within three months from the date of filing of such representation. The Court expects that Respondent no.5/ Accountant General, Bihar, Patna will issue authorization within four weeks from the date of sanction order With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of . NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)