1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:19.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR WP(MD)No.7967 of 2011 N.Augustin :Petitioner -Vs- 1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 2.The Assistant Director, Khadi and Village Industries, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 3.The Branch Manager, Indian Bank, Kaliyakkavilai, Kanyakumari District. :Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to implement the recommendation letter of the second respondent in his proceedings e.f.vz;.5248/2009/rp1 dated 02.11.2010 and hereby sanction Rs.2 Lakhs loan to the petitioner based on the District Task Force Committee Selection dated 02.11.2010 and the petitioner's earlier application along with the recommendation of the second respondent in his proceedings R.C.No.5248/2009/C1 dated 02.11.2010. For Petitioner :Mr.D.Anbarasu For Respondents:Mr.M.Govindan,Special Govt.Pleader for R1&R2 Mr.S.Suresh for M/s.Iyer and Dolia for R3 ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the third respondent to implement the recommendation letter of the second respondent in his proceedings e.f.vz;.5248/2009/rp1 dated 02.11.2010 and hereby sanction Rs.2 Lakhs loan to the petitioner based on the District Task Force Committee Selection dated 02.11.2010 and the petitioner's earlier application along with the recommendation of the second respondent in his proceedings R.C.No.5248/2009/C1 dated 02.11.2010. 2.Heard Mr.D.Anbarasu, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.S.Suresh, learned Counsel appearing for M/s.Iyer and Dolia for the third respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3.By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4.The writ petition has been filed to direct the third respondent to implement the recommendation letter of the second respondent in his proceedings e.f.vz;.5248/2009/rp1 dated 02.11.2010 and sanction Rs.2 Lakhs loan to the petitioner on the basis of the District Task Force Committee Selection. 5.The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in support of his claim, the District Disability Officer, Nagercoil, has sent a detailed memorandum in e.f.vz;.2505/m1/11 ehs;. 5.9.2011 based on the recommendation of the District Task Force Committee Selection. The petitioner has also made a representation to all the respondents on 30.05.2011. 6.Now, the learned Counsel for the petitioner pleads that the grievance of the petitioner will be met if a direction is given to the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 30.05.2011. 7.In view of the above, without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the third respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 30.05.2011 on its own merit and in accordance with law and dispose of the same within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned is free to deal with the matter on its own merit as per law. 8.The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) / TRUE COPY / Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 2.The Assistant Director, Khadi and Village Industries, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 3.The Branch Manager, Indian Bank, Kaliyakkavilai, Kanyakumari District. +1CC to The Special Government Pleader. SR.No.32223. Rsb W.P.(MD)No.7967 of 2011 RP/22.09.2011/2p/5c. 19.09.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/