IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.10234 of 2002 Between: G. Naveen Chandra Reddy S/o G. Pratap Reddy R/o Flat No. 8, Block No.1, MIG-B1/F8, Vinayakanagar, Nizamabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Deputy Executive Engineer (HG), Nizamabad Division, A.P. Housing Board, Nizamabad District. 2 The Regional Housing Engineer, A.P. Housing Board, Nizamabad District. 3 Smt. N. Jaya Prada Devi W/o Muralidhar Rao R/o Nizamabad. R3 is impleaded as per Court Order in WPMP No. 15376/02 Dated 27-9-2002. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue order or orders or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein not to demolish the compound wall of ﬂat No. 8, Block No.-1, MIG-B1/F8, Vinayakanagar, Nizamabad District, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.RAGHUNATH Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.D.RANGANATHA KUMAR The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.10234 of 2002 ORDER: This writ petition has been ﬁled seeking a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in demolishing compound wall of the petitioner in respect of Flat No.8, Block No.1, MIG-B1/F8, Vinayakanagar, Nizamabad District, as illegal and arbitrary. It is stated that the petitioner was allotted the said Flat by the A.P.Housing Board, Nizamabad District. A counter has been ﬁled stating that the petitioner sold the said Flat in favour of K.Bhairaia on 19-11-2004 vide registered document No.9992/2004, after obtaining necessary permission and that the petitioner is not at all living in the said Flat and in fact the transferee of the said Flat has given an undertaking vide letter, dated 10-01-2002 that he will dismantle the unauthorized constructed compound wall. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that nothing survives in the writ petition, as the petitioner is more continues to be the owner of the said Flat. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 28-08-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SRAVAN}