HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.12096 of 2010 Date : 29-11-2011 Between: Iska Sridevamma .. Petitioner And Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Ms.S. Nanda Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4 : Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue Counsel for respondent No.5 : Sri P. Sridhar Reddy The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4 in not considering the petitioner’s representations dated 9-9-2008 and 2-5- 2009 for payment of compensation for her land admeasuring Ac.1-49 cents in Sy.No.457 (dry land) in Muthukuru Mandal, Nellore District, acquired for the purpose of laying road for Sri Krishnapatnam Port, as illegal and arbitrary. A perusal of the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition shows that the petitioner has devoted substantial part of the affidavit to her purported title and right over the extent of Ac.1-49 cents rather than giving details of when and in what manner the said extent was acquired for construction of Sri Krishnapatnam Port. Even the representations dated 9-9-2008 and 2-5-2009 stated to have been addressed to respondent No.3 are also vague. Unless the petitioner raises specific pleas as to whether any proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short "the Act") have been initiated and her land was acquired or the same was taken over without initiating such acquisition proceedings, no relief can be granted to her in this Writ Petition. The petitioner is required to approach the official respondents concerned with specific details to enable them to examine her grievance before she ventures to approach this Court invoking its extraordinary jurisdiction. In this view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed on the mere ground that the same lacks in material particulars. The petitioner is permitted to approach respondent Nos.3 and 4 with a detailed representation ventilating her grievances. If such a representation is made, respondent Nos.3 and 4 shall examine the same and take appropriate decision on the petitioner’s claim for payment of compensation, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the representation. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision to be taken by respondent Nos.3 and 4 on her representation, she shall be free to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law. As a sequel, WPMP No.15251/2010 is disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy Date : 29-11-2011 AM