^:?^^^^ ^^ wn •"<. tt, ^3. HIGH COURT OF fflHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR WritPetition (S} No. 2816 of 2007 Petitioner Resoondenls Tularam, son tf Tgooram Koshnya, aged about 38 yeais, Assistant Teacher, Primary School Mudlpaar, Pret Bhatapra, Dlstrict Ralpur, Chhatttsgarh. Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through ; The Secretary School Educatton Department Mlnlstry, D.K.S. Bhawan, Ralpur Chhattisgarh. 2. The Dtetrict Educatton Offlcer, Ralpur, Distrlct Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. The Btock Educatton Offlcer, Bhatapara, Dlstrlct Ralpur, Chhattlsgarh. B^ition under Artlcle 226 <rf the Constitution of XncBa Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justfce Satlsh K. Agnihotri. Prment: Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jaln, Panel Lawyer for the Stale/respondents. ORDER (Passed on 8th Day of May,2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitloner as well as for the State/respondents jolntly submit that the fact and qu®ttonof taw inwh/ed in the present writ petitlon are the same to that of In Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Munidpal Corporatlon, Durg and another <2(M)6 (II) MnR-CB 96}, which has been dlspcsed of vlde order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed counsel appeamg for the respondents 6oes not controvert the said submfeston. In subsequent cas^, l.e., Writ Petltton (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gapesli Kitmar Venna vs. ne Wate Govt of OihaMsgarh aiid ano ei),af\d other connected matters, declded by this Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant tx> the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and ttie prospectus of Diploma In Education Bominatton, It was clarifled that the nomenclature of (he Bastc Training Instltute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Dlploma in Educatlon, i.e., D.Ed. Accordlngly, the D.Ed, Certiflcate holders are abo covered by the decislon In Writ Petitton (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gope^i Kumar Venna vs. TJie Stats Go»kaf ChhatlSsgarh aiul anotli&i) (Supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petitton is allowed In terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwrant Kumar Bharadwraj Vs. Municipal OrporaUon, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verlflcation of the fact as to whettier the petttioner has acqulred D.Ed. Examinatton CertiflcatE on h'e own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1399 and furtier whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sulrfiash Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge