1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.4261 of 2010 (Nagpur Improvement Trust v. Smt. Sheela R. Tikhe) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri R.O. Chhabra, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri A.A. Naik, Advocate for Respondent. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 14 th January, 2011 This petition challenges the order dated 27-4-2010 passed by the learned District Judge-4, Nagpur, rejecting the applications Exhibits 21 and 22. The application Exhibit 21 was for amendment of the written statement and the application Exhibit 22 was for production of additional evidence under Order 41, Rule 27 of the Civil Procedure Code. The Appellate Court has rejected both these applications on the ground that the document was available with the defendant at the time when the matter was tried before the Trial Court and no case was made out under Order 41, Rule 27 of the Civil Procedure Code. Similarly, the application for amendment has been rejected on the ground that no case was made out for allowing the said application. Since the order impugned in this petition being of interlocutory in nature, no interference is called for in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of 2 India. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. It is always open for the petitioner-NIT to challenge the decision in the appeal in the event it goes against them. Judge pdl