1-1 ^t r- / 0) IN THE HON'BLE HIGH CQURTQF C.G. AT BILASPUR W. P. (CrNO, V\r^S OF 2009 ^srsgss ssni ^T- Kapila Shrivastava, D/o S.C. Shrivastava, aged about years, R/o Parijat Colony, Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil 8s District-Bilaspur (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh, Through Police Chakradharnaga, Raigarh, (C.G.) Station District- —i:t ^y/ ^y .//^T ^J>' .•' JF-'/' . -f?ft,<<f' „?'' y C.K. Shrivastava, W/o K.L. Shrivastava, aged about 68 years, R/o Shri Ram Colony, Behind Stadium, Raigarh, P.S. Chakradharnagar, District- Raigarh (C.G.) Tathagat Shrivastava, aged about S40years, S/o K.L. Shrivastava, R/o Shri Rain Colony, Behind Stadiura, Raigarh, P.S. Chakradharnagar, District- Raigarh (C.G.) C.B. Verma @ Ginni Verma, D/o Shri V.K. Verma, aged about 60 years, R/o Shri Ram Colony, Behind Stadiuin, Raigarh, P.S. Chakradharnagar, District- Raigarh (C.G.) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INDIA The followkig is most respectfully subinitted on behalf -oiLthejDetiLioner^^ ~ 1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTtSGARH_:_Bit-ASPuR VVRIT PETiTiON (Cr) N0.4765 OF 2009 PET1TIONER Kapila Shrivastava RESPONDENTS Versus State ot' Chhattisaarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satlsh K. Aanihotri, J. Present:- Ms. Sunita Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Pane! Lawyer for fhe State. Shri Pawan Shrivastava, Advocate for the resoondents No.3 & 4. ^DcR.OBAU (Passed on thls 29I" day of Aprii, 2011) 1. Heard iearned counsei for the oarties. 2. Grievance of the comDiainant is that the trial of criminal case No.60/2003 is pending before Fourth Additional Sesssons Judae, Raiaarh. The entire order sheet has been Diaced before this Court. Even otheriivise, there is no reason that the trial shouid not be concluded within reasonabie time. There is a lona deiav in conclusion ofthe trial. 3. Accordinaiv. the District and Sessions Judae. Raiaarh 's directed to iook into the matter and ensure that 'the trial is conctuded as eariv as possibie oreferablv wlthin a Deriod of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of thls order. 4. in view of the above. the 'A'rlt Cieiition sSands disoosed of Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge