yaw HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILAWUR w.P. ‘8) No. 6602 of 2007 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Sbn' Ajay Shn'vastava, counsel for the petitioner, Shn' Pradeep Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (31.10.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA,__.1 Heald. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale W.e.f. the date of nutial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. He submits that the issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No.2745]89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. and others), wherein, it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled J"/. \ \to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment. x \ " \\\ Petitioner Smt. Anm‘ Besent, Aged 5O W/o Late Shn' Rajendra Kumax Lal, Assistant Teacher, Bapu Primary School No.-14 Station Pala Ward No. — 11, Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus Respondents State Govt. of Chhatu’sgarh, Through :— Secretary, Tribal Welfam Deparunent 6n Education Deparunent, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2 District Education 0Ecer, Rajanandgaon. (C.G.) 2 g W.P.(S) No. 6602/2007 r submits that this Ram Kumax Sahu and (W.P.{S) No.813 of d counsel for the petitioner furthe Court, While considering the 3ame issue in others Vs. Stats Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another the date of mltlal appointment. Learned counsel for the Learns 2007) by order dated 12.2.2007, has granted negular pay scale wef. parties jointly submits that this c decision of this Court in the case ase is of Ram squarely covered by the Kumar Sahu and another (supra). this petition is allowed in the same terms. this order shall be subject to all In View of that, I vexincations made by the State regarding facts pleaded in fhe ‘M petition. L However, : r . E Sdl— § S Sunil Kumar Sinha i; Judge vatti