IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18327 of 2008 SUMIT KUMAR @ SUJIT KUMAR @ SUMIT YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 15.9.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused for an offence under sections 379, 411, 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is to the effect that he was purchaser of a stolen motor-cycle from the co-accused Bir Pratap Singh. The learned APP submits that on the confessional statement of co-accused, recovery of the stolen motor-cycle was made from the house of the petitioner. Considering the nature of allegations attributed against this petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The application is, accordingly, dismissed. However, on surrender, if so advised, if an application for regular bail is filed in the court below, the same would be considered on its own merits without being prejudiced by the present order. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)