: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1197 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1197 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1197 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10077 OF 2004 A/W REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO.6226 OF 2005 REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO.6226 OF 2005 REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO.6226 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10077 OF 2004 Shri Sitaram Kundalik Bamale ... Applicant/ Petitioner V/s. Union of India & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.G.B. Badiger for Applicant/Petitioner CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED: MAY 5, 2005 MAY 5, 2005 MAY 5, 2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . In view of the fact that the order sought to be restored was passed on merits, the application for restoration is rejected. The application for review petition is taken up for consideration. 2. Heard Counsel. 3. In view of the fact that the Petitioner has alternate, efficacious remedy of filing a suit and claiming all the reliefs, which he claims including : 2 : compensation before the appropriate Civil Court and a grievance is made that certain copies of certain documents are not supplied with, production of which can also be obtained in the Civil Court under the Civil Procedure Code, we see no reason to review the order impugned. Review Petition is also rejected.