IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 909 of 2011 Rajeev Jain and another. … Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and two others. … Respondents. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Chauhan, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Arvind Vashist, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. K.C.Tiwari, Brief Holder, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2. Date May 10, 2011. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2/Tehsildar Kichha, district Udham Singh Nagar, to decide the Case No. 30/240 (08-09) Bhupendra Singh Vs. Kamla Jain pending before him under Section 34 of the Land Revenue Act within a time frame. According to the petitioners, Mutation Case No. 30/240(2008-2009) is pending in the court of Tehsildar Kichha, district Udham Singh Nagar. The grievance of the petitioners is that in spite of the order passed by this Court as well as Additional District Magistrate Udham Singh Nagar, the said mutation case has not yet been decided though as many as 17 dates have been fixed in the matter without any progress. According to the petitioners, respondent no.3 is adopting dilatory tactics. In the circumstances of the case, the Tehsildar Kichha is directed to decide the Case No. 30/240(08-09) Bhupendra Singh Vs. Kamla Jain under Section 34 of the Land Revenue Act pending in that court expeditiously on merits in accordance with law after hearing all the parties, preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. With the said observations, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S.Verma, J.) RCP