IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22327 of 2010 WAKIL SAHNI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 14.07.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail in view of the liberty so granted to him by order dated 02.07.2009 (Annexure-1). Learned counsel for the petitioner once again highlights that apart from confessional statement there is no incriminating material on record. It is also submitted that he is in custody since 27.01.2009. He draws attention of the Court to the order dated 19.05.2009 (Annexure-3), whereby another co- accused, namely, Shambhu Paswan was privileged with bail. Petitioner was granted liberty to renew prayer for bail after 10 months if the trial is not taken up. Learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on the statement made in paragraph no.8, wherefrom it appears that the case has not till date been committed to the Court of session. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is persuaded to dispose of the present application in the following manner:- Let trial Court verify the aforesaid statement made in paragraph no.8, and if it is found true, learned Court below shall release the petitioner, named above, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Aurai P.S. Case no. 17 of 2008, subject to the following two conditions:- (i) One of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioner. (ii) The petitioner shall appear in person before the Court below on each date fixed at the trial. In case of default on two consecutive dates the trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond(s) of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)