IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 11980 of 2009 Decided on: 29.12.2010 Anjana Gupta …Petitioner. Versus H.P. Subordinate Services Selection Board …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 29, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?