IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.18327 of 2010 1. VINOD PRASAD TIMSINA, son of late Dilli Prasad Timsina 2. Shanta Bahadur, Shrestha @ Vinod Shrestha, son of Netra Narayan Shrestha 3. Yuvraj Rai, son of Lal Bahadur Rai 4. Yuvraj Karmi @ Yuvraj Karki son of Keval Bahadur Karmi 5. Mann Bahadur Vishwakarma son of Late Madhav Singh Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 28.06.2010 Learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the application of petitioner no.-5. The application is dismissed as withdrawn as against petitioner no.5. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are accused in a case under Sections 366 (A), 372, 373, 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that 7-8 Nepalis were carrying two girls to Delhi in one of the trains for illegal purpose. Learned counsel submits that the allegation is false. In fact, the other two girls, who were apprehended in the train, were going to Delhi, where their mother too works. He further submits that mother of both the girls, who happen to be the sisters, filed a petition before the Magistrate that the allegations are false. In the circumstances, petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like - 2 - amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. IV, Bettiah (West Champaran) in connection with Narkatiyaganj Rail P.S. case No. 14 of 2010 (S. Tr. No. 216 of 2010). Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)