CWP-9199/10 (1) In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench, Jaipur O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9199/2010 Mustaq Mohmmad Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Date Of Order :: 19/07/2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. V.B. Srivastava, for petitioner. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing the order dt.8.11.2000 whereby resignation submitted by the petitioner was accepted by the authority and obviously petitioner is ceased to be an employee on his resignation being accepted. Counsel submits that since the petitioner was not in the normal state of mind during the intervening period after passing of the order instant petition could not be preferred by him. He has further tried to persuade this Court that the resignation letter which is alleged to have been submitted by the petitioner on 11.3.1999 (Annx.4) in no manner can be considered to be a resignation letter. In the opinion of this Court, the submission deserves no merit for the reason that the petitioner ceased to be an employee on his resignation being accepted by passing of the order dt.8.11.2000. Nothing has been placed on record which could justify the CWP-9199/10 (2) ordinate delay caused in assailing the order impugned after almost a decade of passing of the order and so far as the submission with respect to nature of the letter being sent by the petitioner is concerned, no inquiry can be made by this Court in a limited scope of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, the petition is without substance and is accordingly dismissed. (Ajay Rastogi),J. VS Shekhawat/-p.2 9199cw10Jul19Fnl.doc