IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39206 of 2008 UMESH SHANKAR MANDAL @ UMA SHANKAR MANDAL …… PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …… OPP. PARTY For the petitioner : - Sri Kumar Malendu, Advocate For the Informant : - Sri Amod Kumar, Advocate For the State : - Sri D. Mehta, APP ----------- 2. 16.10.2008 Heard Sri Kumar Malendu, Advocate for the petitioner, Sri Amod Kumar, Advocate for the informant and Sri D. Mehta, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The allegation is that on the wrong and fictitious report prepared by the petitioner about the possession and the nature of the land of a land holder, a fictitious purcha without observance of the rules, was issued under the Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy Act. Petitioner is the Halka Karamchari, who is supposed to have visited the place and to have recorded his findings. One may not apprehend importance of the action of the petitioner in a casual manner, but when one ponders over the implications of the report which could divest a land holder of his land, which he is entitled to hold, then one could find that the petitioner is not entitled to be released on bail. The petition is dismissed. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J)