IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. L.P.A. No.32 OF 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:18.1.2010 Union Territory of Chandigarh and others -----Appellant Vs. Deepak Bhasin and others -----Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present:- Mr. Amar Vivek, Advocate for the appellant. --- Adarsh Kumar Goel,J. This appeal has been preferred against order of learned Single Judge. Operative part of the order is as under:- “As per the Will, the petitioner is entitled to use and occupy Ist and 2nd floor of the house in question. It is an admitted fact that he had submitted building plan to make some changes in the Ist and 2nd floors only. Once it has come on record, that the petitioner is owner of the Ist and 2nd floor of the house, it is LPA No.32 of 2010 (O&M) not justified for the respondent-authorities to insist upon joint application alongwith respondents No.4 and 5, to sanction the revised Building Plan. Faced with the situation, Shari Sharma states that the building plan, submitted by the petitioner, regarding Ist and 2nd floors of the house in question shall be sanctioned as per rules. Needful be done within a period of four weeks.” In view of the fact that order has been passed on the statement of learned counsel for the appellants, we are of the view that this appeal cannot be entertained. Dismissed. (Adarsh Kumar Goel) Judge January 18, 2010 (Alok Singh) ‘gs’ Judge 2