1 CA-3591.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3591 OF 2010 Bipin @ Pravin Rajaram Singh .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Shri Kuldeep S. Patil for the Applicant. Ms S.D. Shinde, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: SEPTEMBER 14, 2010 P.C: The applicant who is alleged to have assaulted one Jamil Ansari allegedly mistaking him for Pappu Seth seeks enlargement on bail. It is stated that the applicant had some enmity with Pappu Seth alias Rakesh Harishchandra Gupta. This led the applicant and his henchmen to attack the hotel and beer bar of Rakesh Harishchandra Gupta. Jamil Ansari was the manager of the hotel. He was beaten up and suffered a fracture on the head. The assailants are supposed to have caused a loss of Rs.5,00,000/- to the property of the complainant by ransacking the hotel. The learned counsel for the applicant points out that the victim himself does not identify the 2 CA-3591.10 applicant as the assailant who inflicted the blows on the victim. No test identification parade is held to enable the victim to identify the applicant as the assailant. The investigation is over and the charge-sheet has been filed. The learned counsel for the applicant states that in order to show his bona fides the applicant would deposit a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- towards half of the value of the property allegedly lost. The learned APP has strong objection to the applicant being released on bail. However, considering the circumstances narrated above, particularly the fact that the victim had no opportunity of identifying the applicant as the assailant, the applicant be released on bail in C.R. No.I-169 of 2010 of Manikpur Police Station, District Thane on his furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs.25,000/- on the condition that the applicant shall deposit in the trial Court an amount of Rs.2,50,000/- within a period of one week, to be dealt with by the learned trial Judge at the end of the trial according to the result of the trial. The application accordingly stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)