HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G.S. SINGHVI AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WAMP No. 1000 OF 2007 AND WRIT APPEAL No.290 OF 2006 Between: M. Laxmi Bai and two others … Appellants And Neelam Narsimha and nine others … Respondents ::JUDGMENT:: Counsel for the appellants : Smt. Saraswathi for Shri V. Venkataramana Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 : Government Pleader for Revenue Counsel for respondent No.6 : Shri V. Venugopala Rao June 28, 2007 Per G.S. Singhvi, CJ Feeling aggrieved by order dated 1-2-2006 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.21256 of 2003, the appellants have filed appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent. The appeal was admitted on 6-4-2006 and the parties were directed to maintain status quo in respect of the property in dispute. Now, the appellants and contesting respondents have filed a joint application stating therein that they have compromised the mater our of court and, therefore, the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. Learned counsel for the parties orally reiterated the contents of the application filed by their respective clients. In view of the above, WAMP No.1000 of 2007 is allowed and Writ Appeal No. 290 of 2006 is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn, WAMP Nos.620, 621 and 1066 of 2006 filed by the appellants are disposed of as infructuous. G.S. SINGHVI, CJ June 28, 2007 C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J ks