IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No : 23029 of 2000 Between: P.Ismail, S/o.Laten Saheb, R/o.15-227-1, Kalahasti Road, Reniguna, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Managing Director, A.P.S.R.T.C., Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Tirupathi Region, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in denying the promotion to the post of ADC/Conductor is illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents to promote the petitioner to the post of ADC/Conductor on par with the other employees who were appointed with him and to pay all consequential beneﬁts of promotion and other beneﬁts and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem ﬁt and proper in the circumstance of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner :MR.G.RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondents : SMT.W.V.S.RAJESWARI The Court made the following : HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No : 23029 of 2000 ORDER : Learned counsel for petitioner has reported that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 26th September 2008 ajr