1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 20 OF 2004 Shri Vijay Shivpad Erandole, Pune(Maharashtra State). ... Applicant versus Smt. Ashwini Sharad Kavadi and another. ... Respondents Mr. S. S. Kakodkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. A. A. Agni with Mrs. N. N. Narvekar, Advocates for Respondent No. 1. Mr. S. N. Sardessai, Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.2. CORAM : V. M. KANADE, J. DATE : 30TH JUNE, 2005. P.C.:­ Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant and the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents. For reasons separately recorded Criminal Revision Application is dismissed. 2 The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant seeks stay of the impugned Order of the trial Court which is confirmed by the lower appellate Court. He submits that the Applicant will have to make arrangements for payment of compensation of Rs.3,00,000/­. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the Order of the trial Court as confirmed by the lower appellate Court is stayed for two weeks. Certified Copy expedited. V. M. KANADE, J. RD.