Writ Petition (227) No.1386 of 2009 PETITIONER: RESPOND (Revisioner) Smt. ShakUntala, aged 35 yeais wife of Shri, Balmukund R/o Village‘ Kheda, Tehsil Navagarh, Diétt. Durg (C.G.) Versus 1. Shlvnandan S/o Vlchiftaram Lodhl ‘ R/o Vlllage Kheda TehSIl Navagarh Dlstt Durg (C G ) The Gram Panchayat Kheda Through Its Sarpanch Block Navagarh Dlstt Durg(CG) The Nalb Tehsilda’r; Nandghat, Distt. Durg(CG) The Upper Collector Bemetara Dlstt Durg (C G ) The Board of Revenue Chhattisgarh Bllaspur Clrcu1t Court At Ralpur"” Through Its Secretary, Raipur (C.G.) e {Writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India} Present: Mr. Malay Kumar Bhaduri counsel for the petitioner. Mr Avmash Chand Sahu counsel for re pondent 'No 1 Mr Rakesh Kumar Jha Deputy Govt Advocate for the State/ respondents No 3 & 4 None present for respondent No.2. Slnqle Bench Hon’ble Mr T P Sharma J ORAL ORDER (27-7 201 0) ' have heard learned counselwfor the parties and perused the order mpugned dated 25-11—2008 passed by the Board of Revenue in evenue Revision Case No.RNI05/R/A-68/892/2007. o order has beenpassed against the petitioner herein. . earned counsel for the petitioner submits that previously the petitioner , has filed an application for impleading him as party, before the Board of Revenue which was dismissed by the B'oard of Revenue. The petitioner “ ' has not challenged such order of dismissal passed by ithe Board of Rveue which ws fina orer ret to he tioner Th d en a l d laing t peti. erefore, l o ENTSI: "'“ 1. l i R ’ .‘ N L V‘ no’t m1d any ground fo‘r interference". in the order“ impugned; “Consequently; the petitibn is liable to- ‘be’ dis‘r‘frissed and ‘if is hereby diSmiS$éd. No order as .to costs. However, the pétitioner may redres y ncludn .cil, 27 s his; grievance “before ‘the appropriate authorit iig. iv in accordance with-law. 4-. Other interim app’lications'etan'd dispoSe‘d of; Sdl r 1P Sha‘ma Judge / _, 4 '