^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.A.NO. 11^ / Appellants : 1. (Non applicants in the< .'*•' court below) Versus Respondent (Jkpplicant in fhe <:ourt below) 2004 Dukhu Ram Sahu S/o Manrakhan, aged about 55 Years, R/o Village Lanjoda P.S-Kondagaon, Dist: Bastar- (C.G.) Krishna Sahu S/o Shri Dukhuram Sahu, Aged about 32 years, R/o Village Lanjoda, P.S-Kondagaon, Dist : Bastar- (C.G.) Ajay Sahu S/o Dukhu Ram Sahu, Aged about 30 years, R/o village Lanjoda, P.S-Kondagaon, Dist: Bastar-fC.G.) S./o Mangau Ram Gond, Aged about 22 years, Village Lanjoda, P.S-Kondagaon, Dist: Bastar-(C.G.) APPEALUNDER SECTION 30 OF THE WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION t.^"^ '"%. "^i fi:wly~.-.. ^. ~:T<TEWf£', ~^rfTWTS, W~i,IVi^ m ^. ^io- (| -L-^? w^3? C^TS^?) ^ FTy ?3~ ^'-f^i »TA?T5n3N? WR-T 'Sff W*?' f -^ S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. ^darwal 21.07.2009 None appears for the appellctfjts. None appears for the responc^ent The matter is called for hear) none appears for the appellants nor S;i"!t-l|l''< TWP. ^ 'TSW TT3R^TT ^; aiSm •3-RsE no twice. On both occasions. ony representation is made on behalf of the appellants. The appeliants may not be interested in prosecuting the matter. In view of the above, the mdtter is dismissed for wont of prosecution. Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge