BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twelfth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.10505 of 2011 NAGENDRAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs STATE THROUGH THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE TALLAKULAM CRIME POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY, CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2011. U/SEC.379, 465 IPC. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : M/S.J.GUNASHEELANMUTHIAH ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MR.A.RAMAR GOVT. ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC. 438 CR.P.C. ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 379 and 465 I.P.C., and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor[Crl side] appearing for the State. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the de-facto complainant, no case and no petition is pending against the petitioner. 4.Considering the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, I am inclined to give a direction to the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of petition enquiry. The respondent is directed to follow the dictum laid down in D.K.Basu Vs. State of West Bengal reported in AIR[1997] SC 610. 5.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. sd/- 12/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / TO Sub-Assistant Registrar 1 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE TALLAKULAM CRIME POLICE STATION, MADURAI. 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC TO M/S.J.GUNASHEELANMUTHIAH, ADVOCATE SR.NO.27809. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10505 of 2011 Date :12/08/2011 1P/4C RPB 17.08.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/