IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.976 of 2008 RAMJEE PRASAD SINGH Versus RAMAYAN SHARMA & ORS ----------- 2 9.7.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. After some arguments counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Counsel for the petitioner in view of the pleadings made in paragraph Nos. 7 to 9 of the Civil Revision application has however submitted that as against the report of the Pleader Commissioner dated 22.8.2000 a detailed objection on several grounds were filed on 11.9.2000 but that application was never disposed of though a rejoinder to that had also been filed by the other side. He has further submitted that the Court below even when it has rejected the later application of the petitioner on a very limited ground, was still required to dispose his aforesaid application. In the opinion of this Court if the facts stated by the petitioner are correct and his application dated 11.9.2000 has not yet been disposed of, the Court below is expected to dispose of the same in accordance with law on 2 such issues which were not considered and decided in the impugned order dated 12.5.2008. With the aforementioned observations this application is dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for. BCJ (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)