IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23494 of 2010 SHRAVAN PANDEY. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. ----------- 02. 09-07-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 05.04.2010 in a case registered under Section 120(B) of the I.P.C., Section 25(1-B) A, 26 of the Arms Act, Section 3/5 of Explosive Substance Act and Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. It is alleged that the Aluminum Nitrate and other substances were recovered along with blank cartridges and other things. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Aluminum Nitrate is used in extensive mining activities. Moreover, the Aluminum Nitrate has been recovered from the cattle shed which are accessible by the outsider. Aboveall, the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and the statement to that effect has been made in paragraph-10 of the petition. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present. 2 The bail application of the petitioner is rejected. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)