1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Criminal Writ Petition No. 37 of 2010 ( Rajkumar Tularam Adkane .vs. The State of Mah. and another. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr. R.M. Daruwala, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. J.B. Jaiswal, APP for Respondents. CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 24, 2010. Heard Mr. Daruwala, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jaiswal, learned APP for the respondents. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 26.11.2009 passed by respondent no.1 rejecting extension of parole leave to the petitioner. Initially the petitioner was granted parole for 30 days. By application dated 8.9.2009 the petitioner prayed for extension of parole leave by 30 days which has been rejected by the impugned order. Mr. Daruwala fairly concedes that the petitioner has already surrendered to the prison. In view of the surrender of the petitioner, the original order of his release on parole becomes inoperative in terms of Rule 26 of the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959. As such there is no question of setting aside the order passed by respondent no.1. 2 In view above , the petition is dismissed. The fees of Advocate Mr. R.M. Daruwala, who has been appointed to appear on behalf of the petitioner, are quantified at Rs.750/-. JUDGE JUDGE halwai