IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 12825 of 2008 Between: Syed Yakub S/o.Late Hyder R/o.Koulas Village, Jukkal Mandal, Nizamabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Atiyat Sub-Collector/R.D.O. Bodhan, Nizamabad District. 2 The Tahsildar, Jukkal, Jukkal Mandal, Nizamabad District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue any appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of "Writ of Mandamus" directing the respondents herein to conduct necessary enquiry and grant succession infavour of the petitioner to the service inamdar rights of masjid Khone Khan, situated at Khoulas Village, Jukkal Mandal, Nizamabad District forthwith in the interest of justice and equity and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.TULASI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 12825 of 2008 Order: The petitioner, who claims to be the successor of his father, states that after the death of his father he made a representation dated 17.01.2002, under Rule 3 of the A.P. (TA) Atiyat Enquiries Rules, 1952, followed by several representations dated 19.12.2004, 22.07.2005, 12.08.205, 30.12.2005 and 19.12.2006, to respondent No.1-Atiyat Sub- Collector/Revenue Divisional Officer, Bodhan, Nizamabad District, for grant of succession of service inam rights in respect of Masjid Khone Khan, situated at Koulas village, Jukkal Mandal, Nizamabad District. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though respondent No.1 and the District Collector, by letters dated 20.01.2005 and 10.07.2007 respectively, requested respondent No.2-Tahsildar to conduct an enquiry and submit detailed report in the matter, so far he has not taken any action in the matter. Hence, he filed the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: Respondent No.2, namely the Tahsildar, Jukkal mandal, Nizamabad District, is directed to conduct an enquiry in the matter for grant of succession in favour of the petitioner in respect of Masjid in question, dispose of his representation, and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 20.06.2008 Nsr