IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24603 of 2008 DINESH RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 4.7.2008 Heard. The petitioner being named in the FIR of a case under Section 392 IPC did not appear for the entire investigation as also when the chargesheet was submitted and the case was before a court of law so much so the processes under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. were issued. The reason as assigned by the Additional Sessions Judge for the absence of the petitioner is that the petitioner and the co- accused from whose possession the vehicle was recovered were closely related to a politician who was a probably an M.L.A. at that particular time, and the police was not inclined to ensure the arrest of the petitioner. Petition is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )