IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH JUNE 2009 / 27TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 16667 of 2009(C) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- MOHAMMED FAIZAL. A, IIIRD PROFESSIONAL M.B.B.S.STUDENT, PUSHPAGIRI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE AND RESEARCH CENTRE,THIRUVALLA. (PERMANENTLY RESIDING AT PATTATHIL HOUSE, AYATHIL.P.O, KOLLAM). BY ADV. MR.SANTHOSH MATHEW MR.SATHISH NINAN MR.ARUN THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR,PRIYADARSHINI HILLS,ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR,MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,PRIYARDARSINI HILLS,ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS,MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,PRIYARDARSINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA,KOTTAYAM. 4. THE PRINCIPAL,PUSHPAGIRI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE AND RESEARCH CENTRE,THIRUVALLA. R1 TO R3 BY ADV. MR.T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G. UNIVERSITY. R4 BY ADV. MR.TONY GEORGE KANNANTHANAM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No. 16667 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 17th June,2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner, who has completed his M.B.B.S Course from a college affiliated to the Mahatma Gandhi University, had written the Third Professional Examination held in January/February, 2009. Apparently, dissatisfied by the marks obtained in the said examination, he had applied for revaluation. He is aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the Examination held in January/February, 2009. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioner in relation to the Third Professional Examination held in January/February, W.P ( C) No. 16667 of 2009 2 2009, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the application for revaluation is in order and otherwise correct. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No. 16667 of 2009 3 W.P ( C) No. 16667 of 2009 4 (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No. 16667 of 2009 5 W.P ( C) No. 16667 of 2009 6 (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No. 16667 of 2009 7 W.P ( C) No. 16667 of 2009 8