IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1169 of 2011 Pitamber Pd. Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ------------------------ 04. 19.10.2011 Heard Mr. Nityanand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Shakti Suman Kumar, Assisting counsel to S.C. 22 for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the University. The writ petition was disposed of by order dated 11.1.2010 requiring the petitioner to present himself before the respondent no. 4 i.e. the Registrar of the respondent-University together with the copy of the order passed by the court, the family genealogy as well as the indemnity bond requiring him to indemnify in case of there being any counter claim. Upon submission of the aforesaid paper the Registrar of the University was required to take prompt step for making the payment of the pending retiral dues admissible to the father of the petitioner together with interest. On non-compliance of the direction of this Court the present contempt application has been filed. A supplementary show cause and a second supplementary show cause has been filed demonstrating compliance of the directions by this Court. Learned counsel for the University while relying upon the statement made in paragraph 3 and 4 of the show cause submits that whatever amount that was found admissible to the petitioner towards family pension, interest on pension and gratuity, employees 2 welfare fund has since been paid to the petitioner. It is further mentioned that the amount towards leave encashment and group insurance has also since been paid. It is thus submitted that the order of this Court stands complied. Mr. Nityanand, leaned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner disputes the calculations in the light of the counter affidavit filed in the writ petition. Considering the circumstances that this Court while disposing of the writ petition had directed the University to examine the claim of the petitioner and make payment thereof and in compliance whereof the payment has since been made by the University to the petitioner, any dispute being raised by the petitioner before this Court as regarding the quantum of payment may be raised by him before the authority concerned together with supportive documents and which may be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations the contempt application is disposed of. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)