F SlSRUih.i" jpmy ^ INTHE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISOARH WRIT PETITION No. A-^5 /2006 PETITIONER ^^€?" ^ ^•sy^ M:. ^v"^w c)y" ....•••^ / Smt. Victoria Tirki W/o Shri "^S^- . Clemant Tirki aged about 33 years, Village - Jamdi Block- Manpur, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) SPONDENTS .Goy VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretaiy, Panchayat 85 Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) t; "h <.^^'^^-/ly'2. The Chief ExecutiveOfficer, '"y'^\\y'^y ^i^S' Janpad Panchayat, Manpur ^ Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3. Head Master, Vaikalpik (Unnayan) Primaiy School, Mouchar, Manpur Distt. Rajnandgaon PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA fcs XI-HC—78 'l.-' 30^1 W R-)i<* )'TOT •affI^T ?CTRR' • < ?wr ';;'ipiRra', ®t?lwi<o,ftwi'My 'WTRTWITO" " " 7:7 TF^ 200 & 311^1'^^T (Tpf3^Str) TOiraT^ifNan^r SB: Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker 30.06.; Shri Anup Majumd|ar counset Shri Yashwant Smitha Ghai PL foj' Shri Amrito Das cdunsel Si|ngh Case of the petitioner is as Instructor in Panchayat Subsequently, after up-gradat) Ji under San/a Shiksha Abhi^an pay scale of contract teac^er petitioner was terminated fij 22.2.2006 and it is the said t^r chalienge in this petition. trie Contentionof the coun^ filing of the present petition, vide order dated 29.6.2006 now the limited relief of the p| salary for the period 22.2.200^ ttl^lCT^l'f <m?tf "^f "fet^ <^l^K ^affinan^r for the petitioner. Thakur Dy. AG and Smt. the respondents No. 1 and 3. . for respondent No.2. that initially she was appointed |nd Rural Welfare Department. |on, she was appointed as Guru scheme and was given the |ier Grade III. Thereafter, the tom service vide order dated fermination order which is under jel for the petitioner is that after petitioner has been reinstated p^ssed by respondent No.2 and )^titioner is in respect of grant of 1 to 29.6.2006. ^«*"-"-.. 3fr XI-HC—78 an^ff w ft-fl'k wn sii^i sb><i+ .^,.-^ -.. v< 'S'ai '^IFTRCT, s-aly'14, T°«yll'y*i< ^fWvn iBHI<^ 3ii^iTra3R('^f3P^?:i) Counsel for the petition^r very low paid employee circumstances she is workingl that the respondents have g4>t scheme and thesalary for thej her by them. Lastty, he submif a suitable representation to direction for deciding the sanjie payment of salary for the submission of the counsel idf respondents, have no objectio^i. resporjdent Accordingly, the the representation, if any, period of three weeks from I accordancewith law. The petition is thus disp<{ <^iqSl?i^T^ff^i tf fs*<il ^t^K ipsjfinsi'i^i submits that the petitioner is a and under the compelling as Guru Ji. He further submits sufficient fund under the said aforesaid period can be given to s that the petitioner would make respondent No.2 and seeks a sympathetically and to make iforementioned period. To this the petitioner, counsel for the No.2 is directed to decide n^ade by the petitioner within a |he date of its receipt strictly in )sed of in the afore-stated terms. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge •v\'