IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 2ND DECEMBER 2008 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 35541 of 2008(F) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- 1. SHAHEER MOHAMMED O.M., S/O.MOHAMMED SHAREEF, AGED 22 YEARS, RESIDING AT ORUVIL HOUSE, KOLAMANGALAM, VALANCHERY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. AJMAL K.A., S/O.K.K.ABOOBACKER, AGED 23 YEARS, RESIDING AT KUMMATH HOUSE, ANJUR P.O., CHERUVATHANAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY CALICUT UNIVERSITY PO., THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Rs/ V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No.35541 of 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 2nd December, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioners, who have completed their Engineering Degree Course from a college affiliated to the University of Calicut, had written Supplementary Examination held in December, 2007. Apparently, dissatisfied by the marks obtained in the examination, they had applied for revaluation. They are aggrieved that the results of the revaluation have not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the Supplementary Examination held in December, 2007. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioners in relation to the 4th and 6th Demester Engineering Degree W.P ( C) No.35541 of 2008 2 Supplementary Examination held in December, 2007, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the applications for revaluation are in order and otherwise correct. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.35541 of 2008 3 W.P ( C) No.35541 of 2008 4 (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.35541 of 2008 5 W.P ( C) No.35541 of 2008 6