IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12897 of 2011 Mritunjay Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3 14-07-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 08.12.2010 in a case registered under sections-363, 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code. According to prosecution case itself, the victims were taken away on 29.11.2010 but they returned to their respective homes in the morning of 30.11.2010 and after that their statements were recorded under section-164 of the Cr.P.C. in which they stated about the involvement of petitioner in the alleged crime. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there was no demand of ransom and admittedly, victims returned to their home without taking the aid of police or any other person. It is further contended by him that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent which has been specifically pleaded at paragraph-16 to this petition and as a matter of fact, the petitioner has been implicated in this case at the behest of the informant. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Mritunjay Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two 2 sureties of the like amount each in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 508 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)