IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12156 of 2011 PREM SAGAR GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 28.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the Rojgar Sewak is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 467, 468, 469, 471, 474, 406 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of not taking work from the labourers of the master roll and withdrawing Rs. 3,75,000/- from the post office whereas, the payment was made only to the extent of Rs. 1,44,000/-. The F.I.R. reflects that the B.D.O., was directed by the D.D.C. to lodge the F.I.R. against the Mukhiya on the basis of inquiry conducted by D.D.C., which reflects that the executing agent for the scheme of 2008-09 was Smt. Sushila Devi who was entrusted with the money. With regard to other misappropriations, the other persons have been held responsible, the inquiry report 2 does not reflect any accusation against the petitioner though the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. Learned counsel for the State submits that the investigation will clarify the involvement of the petitioner as the investigation is still pending. Considering the fact that neither the F.I.R. nor the inquiry report of the D.D.C reflect any accusation against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Haweli Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 39/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)