THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Contempt Case No.1430 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioners filed W.P.No.4468 of 2011 feeling aggrieved by an order, dated 01.11.2010 passed by the 3rd respondent. Through the said proceedings, the 3rd respondent required the petitioner to explain as to why disciplinary action be not taken against him. This Court declined to interfere, on the ground that the 3rd respondent does have the jurisdiction to issue show cause notice. However, an observation was made to the effect that the insistence on the part of the respondents upon the petitioners to withdraw W.P.Nos.26631 of 2010 and 27158 of 2005 cannot be sustained. Four weeks’ time was stipulated for passing orders on the representation made by the petitioners. This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents acted contrary to the orders of this Court. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioners are not clear as to what acts and omissions on the part of the respondents constitute contempt of court. If at all anything, it can be only as regards the delay in passing the orders. Today, the learned counsel for the respondents has placed before this Court, the copies of the proceedings, dated 23.11.2011, through which the 1st respondent dismissed the petitioners from service. In case, the petitioners have any grievance about the said order, they can pursue the remedies in accordance with law. The contempt case is accordingly closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ (L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J) Date: 28.11.2011 JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Contempt Case No.1430 of 2011 Date: 28.11.2011 JSU