OC:1 r-i00 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.^82^/2005 @ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^ ^l. /y/ ^ Y '/ .^y/ ^^/ ^y^ <s°y'^y Chetan Singh Darro, S/o. Late Mahettar Singh Darro, Aged about 39 years, Teacher, R/o. Pakhanjore, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary & Ministry Tribal & Welfare Development Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur. ^'^w <b* •^ ^' ^ .-.^' / •/^'^ .^/^' ^.J <:y /Kc^.^ ^&y r^ o- / hj' /2. The Commissioner, Tribal & Welfare Development Department, ^ Raipur (C.G.) ^' y' The Joint Director, District Education Departmenty District Kanker (C.G.) 4. The District Education Officer, District Kanker (C-G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ovf •^<iqirt<|, tPT?i1(-l''l<»,RlrtN-f^ W^a,^.^.&M^.±^/.^ ^200 ^OTi^T^rR^icb ?' "^. 3H^5T q^l> (<3^^f) ^Rrrm^Tf^Tw^^T froila bee|a 19.10.2005 Shri Shorabh Jais^ Vivek Shanaa, Paael for tli|' Meard. The submission of the petitioner, who is woi has been transferred Kaiiker to Primar^7 Sch( traasfer was done on his leai'iied couHsel for tlie was passed cn 30.6.2003 tih.e petitioner has not the saiae place of posting. ] Duiing the course petitioner makes fliis staj 30.6.2003, has not beei-( existence. He prays for concemed to reUeve tlie p| aforesaid order of transfeil On the other haadl that since the order was| considerable period ha^ possibility ofvadation or order of this Court purs^ may create anaiiioly. ^al, counsel for the petitioner aad Shri ]|e State 011 advaD.ee copy. ^amed counsel for tlie petitioner is fh.at ['knig ou fh.e post of Assistaat Teacher, Priraaiy SchQol, Koyalibeda, District |)ol, Kanharpiir, District Kaiiker, This own request, The further submission of ^itioner is fhat thoiigh the traasfer order (^ut after the lapse of such a long period, reUeved. FIe is constraiaed to work on cpi<<Io<nri ^i^rtT^'fe^l xRt^i^ ^srf^rsn^sT of arguinents, learned counsel for the :enient fhat the order of traiisfer dated caiiceUed so far and the same is ui ssuance of direction to tiie authority ^titioner imniediately ia pursuaace of the learaed counsel for fhe State s.ubmifs passed as back as on 30.6,2003 .aad been lapsed, therefore, there is a ^aiiceUation of order of traiisfer aad aav lant to traasfer order dated 30.6.2003 SP/FS/2005-20,000 \dT?q T«|iqic)<|,tPTll<(1<l<o, Rlrtl'<-iy'< ^^^^ ..^:.^..^^^^ W^^Tq^p ((jc|I^<5|«e;) 3TT^$T^TRTlitp ?V?4T3n^9T^^i<h ^a^ SP/FS/2005-20,000 5^TSR^1^giT^?T ..- 2-1 Considerin.g ftie fac( opio.ion of this Court, a case. It is herebv dii'ectl petitioner dated 30.6.20q caacelled, varied or chai]| existence, the petitioner s] froni fhe date of productic^ concenied authority. It is niade clear that dated 30.6.2003 (Amie?4 varied, changed or alterec| order passed by this Cour|:. The petition staiids Certified copy as pe| Consequeiitiy, M.W| 2005 also staiid disposed (pi<<io<nvi +ii<ic^v^B(^l^i ^^K ^3T^T3n^$T LS and circunistaiices of the case, ia the ^onditioual orcler niay be passed iii fh.is ?d ttiat if tlie order of traasfer of tlie 3, filed as Aunexurc-P/ 1 has not been ged ui aiiy m.aaner aiid the same is in laJl be relieved witiiiii a period of 15 days a ofcertified copy of tliis order beforc fhe t if the order of traasfer of ttie petitioner ure-P/1) has akeady been caiiceUed, iii aiiy nianner by this tmie, then fhis t shatl have no force.. Giially disposed of. ' rules. P. No. 3922 of 2005 & I.A. No. 8637 of of. ' __-———~~ Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge