1 S.B.Criminal Revision Petition No.1030/2005 State of Rajasthan v. M/s Purshottam Das Jagdish Chandra & Ors. Date of Order :: 17th January, 2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Mr. P.R.Choudhary, for the respondents. .... Being aggrieved by an order dated 2.6.1997 passed by learned Collector, Jodhpur exercising powers under Section 6-B of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 1955”), confiscating the commodity seized, an appeal as per provisions of Section 6-C of the Act of 1955 was preferred before learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur and that came to be allowed vide order dated 6.8.2005 (Cr.Appeal No.86/1998). Learned Sessions Judge while setting aside the order confiscating 2031 litres petrol ordered to return the sale amount of petrol seized to present respondents. The State Government by this revision petition has assailed validity of the order dated 6.8.2005 on the count that on the day petrol was seized, the firm was not having any dealership licence for petrol outlet. 2 I have examined the order impugned and also the order passed by learned Collector. Learned Sessions Judge on examination of entire record found that by a latter dated 25.6.1997 conveyed to the State Government that Hindustan Petroleum Corporation by a latter dated 25.8.1996 provided petrol dealership to the firm concerned but the licence was not accordingly amended. As a matter of fact the respondent firm was having authority from the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation to have petrol dealership prior to 26.4.1997, the day on which the outlet was checked. In view of whatever stated above, I do not find any error in the order passed by learned Sessions Judge, and thus, the revision petition is having no merit. The same, therefore, is dismissed. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. Kkm/ps.