1 cra978-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 978 OF 2010 Murlidhar Laxman Sarate .. Applicant V/s. Madhukar Mhaskuji Galande .. Respondent .... Mr. P. V. Dube for the Applicant. Ms. Lalita Panchakshri for the Respondent. .... CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : DECEMBER 15, 2010. P.C. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant on instructions of the applicant states that the applicant is not pressing the revision application on merits. He states that considering the fact that the applicant is occupying the suit premises for several years, time to vacate of the three years and more be granted subject to filing usual undertakings. The learned advocate appearing for the Respondent opposes the said prayer. 2. Applicant has made a statement that he is not pressing the revision application on merits. The applicant has shown 2 cra978-10 willingness to file usual undertakings to vacate. There is no decree passed on the ground of bonafide requirement. The applicant has been in possession of the suit premises for a very long time. If this revision application was to remain pending in this court for final hearing, the same would not have reached for final hearing for some years. Considering the facts and circumstances, longer time of three years to vacate the suit premises deserves to be granted. 3. Hence, I pass the following order : :: O R D E R :: i. Revision Application is dismissed as not pressed. ii. Notwithstanding the dismissal of the revision application, the decree for possession shall not be executed till 30th November, 2013 subject to applicant and all his adult family members filing usual undertakings in this Court to vacate the suit premises. iii. If undertakings are not filed within a period of four weeks from today, the decree for possession will become executable forthwith. JUDGE