HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Cpram: Hon'ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra & Hon'ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar. JJ Writ Petition (Cl No.956 of 2011 Petitioner Arshad Ali, a'o Asad Ali, aged about 50 years, Contractor, R/o Maszid Road, Keshkal, District Bastar (CG) Vs. Respondents 1. Petjtjoner State of Chhattisgarh through The Secretary, Department of Urban Administration, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur(CG) 2. Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Keshkat, District Bastar (CG) 3. Nagar Panchayat Keshkal Through Chief Municipat Officer, Keshltal, DlstrictBaster (CG) WritRetition (Gl No.974 of2<)11 Umesh Kymar Netam, S/o Shri S.S. Netam; aged about 34 years, Contractor;R/o Village Keshkat, P.S. & TehsilKeshkal, District Bastar (CG) Vs. Resoondents 1. Petitioner / State of Chhattisgarh through The Secretary, Department of Urban Administration, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur(CG) 2. Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Keshkal, District Bastar (CG) _ 3. Nagar Panctiayat Keshkal Through Chief Municipal Officer, hteshtel, District Bastar (CG) Writ Petition (C»No.97S of2011 Mahavir Jain, S/o Late Babulal Jain, aged about 26 years, Contractor, R/o Near Jain Mandir, Main Road, P.S. & Tehsil Keshlal, District Bastar (CG) Vs. Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh through The Secretary, DefJartment of Urban Administration, Mantralaya, DKS Bhav/an, Raipur (CG) .f C 2. 3. Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Keshkal, District Bastar (CG) _ -_ Nagar Panchayat Keshkal Through Chief Muntcipal Officer, , Keshkal, Dlstrict Bastar(CG) Present: ShriVarun Sharma, counsel for the petitfonere. Shfl A.S. Kafchhwaha, Dy. A.G. forthe State. Priya ORAI- ORDER (15.03.2011) W.P(C) ^fi^s. 956/2011, 974/2011 and 975/2011 are beinl disposed ofbythiscommon order asthe issue involved inthesp r ' ! -'^- petitions is common. 2. The petitioners were intimated by the respondent No.2 vide its memootAnnexureP-ldated 02.02.2)11 that theytiave been blacklisted^br a pierKxl otAyears from participating in any tender issuetf bylNagatl'Sffichayat, Keshkial. ^ 3. ShriA.S.techhviffilha,leairilectcclunselforthe State submlts that in the meanwhite, Nagar Panchayat, Keshkaf, vide its resolution dated 08.03.2011 of Annexure R-2/2 has atready deleted the portion in the memo dated 02.02.2011 (Annexure P-1), whereby the petitfoners have been disqualified from participating in jthe tender process initiated by Nagar Panchayat, Keshkal. N 4. Leamed pounsel for the petKionere submlts that in wew of the above submission made by learned counsel for the respondents and document of Annexure R-2/2, he may be permitted to withdraw these petitions. 5. Accordingty, atl theaforesaid petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. -" . —— Sd/- sdj.«*ra R^. Chandrakar fff&t3-^"" ' •