c r. BEFORE THE HONTBLE HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION N0. ^ ^^\ /2005 PETITIONER ^\<^^ \^ ^,.;.-5.^>- "^A"^'"" ^•'""^^•)"" <^-A"^':' '^: RESPONDENTS ^^s 1. ^2. .3. . 4. Ramchandra Jaiswal, aged about 44 years, son of Shri Kunwar Singh Jaiswal, Sales Man, Aadiwasi Seva Sahkari Junapara, Tah. Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur, Registration No. 2128, resident of Gayatri Ward Gayatri Ward, Lormi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - the Secretaiy, Department of Co- operative Society, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur (C.G.) The Registrar / Commissioner, Department of Cooperative Society, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Aadiwasi Seva Sahkari Maryadit, Junapara, Tah. Takhatpur, Regn. No. 2128, Distt. Bilaspur, through - Its Authorised Officer. Sanjay Jaiswal, aged about 27 years, son of Shri Vasudev Jaiswal, Salesman, Adiwasi Seva Sahkari Junapara, Tah. Takhatpur, Regn No. 2128, Distt. Bilaspur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. T XI-HC-22 W^I^T f^w^nt^i '5hHt^ ^iTT ~3~^[ •^Tp^PT, ^flTFf^, ?®i<ni^^< ,• ..M^M^ -•^ 200 "3^ NI^CS11 ^W^ 'fN^?" 'STT^T'^TT^R ^TitcT 2-1-2006 c?)i^fa<fl^ 'pn^ff ^ -f^Tst -^f^p; ^ ^Tf^R ^^l Shri C.D. Sharma, counsel Ijor the petitioner. Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Dy. <^ovt. Advocate, for the State. Heard on I.A. No.9076/2005|for amendment. The amendment is to the ^ffect that during the pendency of the petition, a dpcument (Annex.P/Sj averment is to be made in parsj is sought to be produced and the 3 that suspension order has been revoked and the petitioner hasjoin^d 6n 21/7/2005. The application is allowed. Heard. The petition was filed on| |-et the amendment be incoiporated. the ground that th©petitioner was suspended illegally. The pray^r was made to the effect that the petitioner be reinstated and furtherj It is submitted that the cont salary be paid to him. plaint was made against the petitioner 'but after inquiry the charges hav^not been found to be proved and the charges have been dropped. Thje recommendation was made and the petitjoner has been reinstated. submits that the question remains Learned counsel for ttie Learned counsel for the petitsoner about the salary. itate on the other hand submits ttiat main grievance of the petitior^er has been redressed and if any grjevance js still pending, the sajme wiil be considered and decided ^y the authorities concerned. Having considered the fa4ts and drcumstances and the material on record and in view of the ajforesaid finding, it is directed that the matler regarding payment of sal concerned as early as possible ^iry, ete. be decided by the authorities :>referably within three months from the [^fr^'^fe^ -^- 'J ^' XI-HC-22 S^T^T f<^J<=h 3T|^T ^RWTrfi^ H/- p.M'^ ^ ^ ? "3~^r ^5j^s<n^/ ^•d1<H^(o, l^rray* ^n^i ^nr^: TTfirr -2- date of production of the copy of that if any grievance still remain availabie at law induding filing With the aforesaid observal Certified copy as per rules. ihis orderbefore them. It is made clear i^, the petitioner may avall the remedy petitionafresh. [ions, this petition stands disposed of. oflhe Copy to the State coynsel f^r compliance. • <=hl<L}f<n^1T1 tTFI^f "H 'fe1cst ^N^$1^ "^^TpcTHW^T Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^•^fe^'