IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Criminal No. 431 of 2010 S.C. Jain. .……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others. .………. Respondents Mr. G.C. Kandpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nandan Arya, Asst. Government Advocate for the State / respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Because of the averments made in the Interim Application, filed by the petitioner, to the effect that he is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation, the petitioner, himself, has made out a clear case for dismissal of his writ petition, where he has challenged the First Information Report. If the First Information Report is so bad that the same can be quashed, as has been prayed for in the writ petition, then question of the petitioner cooperating in the investigation will not arise. Despite that, petitioner has shown keen interest to cooperate in the investigation. 2. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. It is hoped and expected, as has been assured by the petitioner, he would cooperate with the investigation. It is also hoped and expected that if the petitioner is not involved with the matters complained of in the First Information Report, the Investigating Officer shall not unnecessarily harass him. (Barin Ghosh, C. J.) 07.03.2011 G