IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Criminal Misc. No. M-16854 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision:09.07.2008 Gurpal Singh and another .....Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. N.K.Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. **** RAJESH BINDAL J. This is a petition for direction to respondent No.2 to take action on complaint dated 20.3.2008 (Annexure P.1). Learned counsel for the petitioners states that petitioners submitted complaint dated 20.3.2008 (Annexure P.1) with the Senior Superintendent of Police, Moga but no action has been initiated on the complaint of the petitioners. Keeping in view the law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. and others 2008 (1) RCR (Criminal) 392 such a petition for direction to the police for taking action on the complaint could not be entertained as the petitioners has effective alternative remedy under Section 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and as such this Court would not like to interfere in the matter in its extra ordinary jurisdiction. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail of alternative remedy in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, however, with liberty to the petitioners to avail of their alternative remedy in accordance with law. July 09, 2008 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) renu JUDGE