IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38179 of 2009 1. ANITA DEVI 2. RENU DEVI 3. RANJANA DEVI 4. FULO DEVI. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 27.11.2009 Heard the parties Petitioners, who are lady members of one family, have approached this court seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse sections of Indian Penal Code including Section 307 IPC. It is contended that both the parties are agnates. Over a dispute, they fought each other. There is a case and counter case. It is contended that these lady members are named in the F.I.R., there is absolutely no allegation against petitioner no. 4 Phulo Devi. So far as petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 3 are concerned, the allegation is that they have taken away golden chain and bangles from the hands of some of the injureds. Learned counsel submits that the allegations, in the facts and circumstances of the case, appeared to be wholly ornamental. It is again highlighted that there is counter version also in the shape of F.I.R. (Annexure-2) In the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks, let petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten 2 thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Kaluahi P.S. case no. 60 of 2009/G.R. No. 1647 of 2009 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )