-1- bpk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3555 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.2650 OF Trimbak Estates Pvt. Ltd. : Plaintiff v/s K.R. Nayak & ors. : Defendants Mr. A.S. Rai for plaintiff Ms. S. P. Trivedi i/b A. Bharat &co. for defendant no.2. Mr. H.J. Lulia i/b Mr. D.J. Lulia for defendant no. 4 Coram : S.J. Kathawalla, J. Date : 8.10.2008 P.C. . The above suit is filed for specific performance of the agreement dt. 25.4.1996 (Ex.E to the plaint). This notice of Motion is taken out by the plaintiffs seeking appointment of court receiver and injunction against the defendants restraining them from selling and/or creating third party rights in respect of the suit property. An ad-interim application was made before this court (Coram : A.M.Khanwilkar,J.) on 26.9.2007 when a workable order between the plaintiff and defendant no.4 was passed. . Today it is submitted on behalf of the plaintiff and defendant nos. 2 to 4 that they have no objection if the ad-interim order dt.26.9.2007 is confirmed as final order in the Notice of Motion. In -2- view thereof pending the hearing and final disposal of the above suit the ad-interim order dt.26.9.2007 has been confirmed and the notice of motion stands disposed of. . Advocate for the plaintiff has also submitted that he desires to carry out certain amendments to the plaint and thereafter he may be desirous of taking out a notice of motion seeking further reliefs based on the new facts /documents introduced in the plaint by way of amendment. Advocates for defendant no. 2 and 4 have no objection to such liberty being granted. Needless to add that plaintiff can seek further ad-interim and interim reliefs after an amendment application to introduce new facts/documents in the plaint is allowed. (S.J. Kathawalla,J.)