i. f""\ £."1 t . \ot S1NGLEBENC THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR. WRrTPETITION N0.2-0 l^ OF 2006 PETITIONER t^ >lo^..--^^ ^.'.-<y:""~..- Ql:^"i}^y'"...-"""" ^^^^•y '^- A®^"" ^ESPONDENTS -^ -^K.L. Sori s/o Late C.S. Sori , aged about 46 years, Occupation Nayab Tahsildar Sub Tahsil- Sargaon, Tahsil Mungeli, District Bilaspur C.G. VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary Revenue Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Tahsil Mungeli, District Bilaspur C.G. 3y/'Shri B.S. Markam, Nayab Tahsildar Sub Tahsil Sargaon, Tahsil Mungeli, District Bilaspur C.G. WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FQR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC, XI-HC-78 *<l*ini sh*iich 3?g' '<ii''4ici<<, ®Tfl^'i6,Rioi+iy , ..L3^.^..^Yp.[p^ ^^ sn^rwR-fi'* (PTT3Tl^Tsht1 Barve Sfl^i ^iacn (yiI^sKt^') s^iraTHf^a'sn^r 16.6.200S:- Heard Shri Rakesh Pandey, The main grievance raised Bilaspur. Vide, lyipugned order da| q>i<<Tci<fl-f iii<iT^'tecfl'<Ri't<;i< ^a.rf^iT^n^r counsel for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy G|ovt. Advooate for respondents No.1 & 2. 3y the petitioner in this petition is that the petitioner is working presently oi|i the post of Naib Tehsildar, Sargaon, ed 8-6-2006 Shri B.S. Markam has been transferred on the post of Naib Tetlsiidar, Sargaon wrthout passing any order regarding posting of the petitioner. | Learned counsel for the p^titioner submitted that the said order is going to create problem for the re^son that there is only one post on which the petitioner is already working anfi another person i.e. respondent No.3 has also been posted on that post, |herefore, this order is going to create administrative problem as well as| respondent No.3. In the cireums< make representation to respond^ representation to which opunsel fori Having heard learned coun^ facts and circumstances of the c^se, the petitioner is allowed to make a detailed representation raising all petition to respondent No.1 ani representation within a period o representation, in accordance with petitioner should not be disturbed fi|om the present place of posting. With the direction aforesaid, Consequenlly, M.(W.)P. No.| Partiesare entitted for oertifil payment of salary to the petitioner and ^nces, the petilioner may be directed to Int No.1 and he be dirwted to decide |respondents has no objeclion. |el for the parties and having regard to the his grievances along with copy of the 1 in turn respondent No.1 to decide 30 days from the date of receipt'^of aw. Till the representalion is decided, the the petition stands disposed of. 2138/2006 also stands disposed of. ed copy ofthis order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge