IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.17088 of 1999 Between: M. Narender, S/o.Narasimha, R/o. 4-1-776, Tuljaguda, M.J. Market, Hyderabad District. ... PETITIONER AND 1. Special Employment Exchange, for Physically Handicapped, Rep. by its Regional Employment Officer, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2 Brigadier Commander, Headquarters, Andhra Area. Secunderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, preferable one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent in not enquiring into the matter complained of by the petitioner with regard to appointing another person with the same name of the call letters issued by the 2nd respondent pursuant to the call letters issued by the 2nd respondent dt.11.12.95 and 6.6.98 and not finalizing the enquiry initiated pursuant to the letter of the 1st respondent dt.5.1.1999, in this regard, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and further direct, the respondent herein to consider the case of the petitioner for his appointment in any suitable post under the jurisdiction of the 2nd respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. CHALLARI NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for Respondents: GP, LABOUR The Court made the following: Order: There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. __________________________ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY. June 11, 2008 MRR