IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.178 of 2010 STATE BANK OF INDIA Versus RAM LAKHAN SAO & ORS. ----------- 5 01.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. I.A. No. 7353 of 2010 has been filed for condoning the delay of one day in preferring this application. For the reasons mentioned in paragraph 4 of this application, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner was prevented from sufficient cause from preferring this petition within time. As a result, this interlocutory application is allowed and the delay in filing this application is hereby condoned. Now I proceed to consider M.J.C. No. 178 of 2010 on its own merit. This application has been filed for restoration of Civil Revision No. 907 of 2007, which stood dismissed for want of prosecution on 18.12.2009. The civil revision was dismissed in its first hearing and hence, it is submitted that none of the opposite 2 parties were present at the time of dismissal of the civil revision. For the reasons mentioned in paragraph nos. 3 and 4 of this application, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner has shown sufficient reason for omission on his part at the time when the case was called out. As a result, this application is allowed and Civil Revision No. 907 of 2007 is restored to its number and file. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)