IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7689 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT S DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- MANNARGUDI SUBRAMANIAM SHRINIVASAN Versus FOOD CORP OF INDIA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 7689 of 1995 MR US BRAHMBHATT for Petitioner No. 1 MS VARSHA TIWARI for Respondent No. 1 M/S THAKKAR ASSOC. for Respondent No. 1 .......... for Respondent No. 2 SERVED BY RPAD - (N) for Respondent No. 3 MR YF MEHTA for Respondent No. 4-5 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT S DAVE Date of decision: 13/12/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. A grievance is ventilated by the petitioner in the present writ petition with regard to non-payment of outstanding dues towards contribution of provident fund to the petitioner by the respondents. The petitioner has made the following prayers in paragraph 8(A): "Directing the respondents to release payment of Rs.17327/- together with 18% compound interest w.e.f. 1.8.1991 uptil the date of realisation towards matching contribution lying under CPF A/c. No.28149, within a month." 2. It is borne out from the record, and, as admitted by the learned advocate for the petitioner, that the amount due to the petitioner has already been paid to the petitioner by the respondents, and, therefore, no grievance survives in the present matter. 3. In this view of the matter, the petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. (Anant S. Dave, J.) (swamy)