IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.1917 of 2010 with CWPs No.1922, 1923, 1924, 1925, 1926, 1927, 1928, 1929, 1930, 1931, 2238, 2239, 2240, 2241, 2242, 2243, 2244, 2246, 2247, 2248, 2249, 2250, 2251, 2252, 2253, 2254, 2256 and 2257 of 2010. Decided on: May 18, 2010 [ For title : please see below ] Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. For the Petitioners : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) CWP No. 1917 of 2010 Smt. Shakti Pathania ....Petitioner. Versus 1. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 1922 of 2010 Smt. Revata Devi ....Petitioner. Versus 2. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. 2 CWP No. 1923 of 2010 Smt. Sheela Devi ....Petitioner. Versus 3. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 1924 of 2010 Smt. Kashmira Devi ....Petitioner. Versus 4. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 1925 of 2010 Smt. Saroj Kumari ....Petitioner. Versus 5. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 1926 of 2010 Smt. Suresh Kumari ....Petitioner. Versus 6. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 1927 of 2010 Smt. Sunita Sharma ....Petitioner. Versus 7. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 1928 of 2010 Smt. Neema Kumari ....Petitioner. Versus 8. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 1929 of 2010 9. Smt. Usha Devi ....Petitioner. 3 Versus State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 1930 of 2010 Smt. Kamla Devi ....Petitioner. Versus 10. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 1931 of 2010 Smt. Suresh Kumari ....Petitioner. Versus 11. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 2238 of 2010 Smt. Sunita Devi ....Petitioner. Versus 12. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 2239 of 2010 Smt. Krishna Devi ....Petitioner. Versus 13. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 2240 of 2010 Smt. Pushp Lata ....Petitioner. Versus 14. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 2241 of 2010 Smt. Sushma Kumari ....Petitioner. Versus 15. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. 4 CWP No. 2242 of 2010 Smt. Kanta Devi ....Petitioner. Versus 16. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 2243 of 2010 Smt. Suman Kumari ....Petitioner. Versus 17. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 2244 of 2010 Smt. Anita Kumari ....Petitioner. Versus 18. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 2246 of 2010 Smt. Kanta Devi ....Petitioner. Versus 19. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 2247 of 2010 Smt. Prem Lata ....Petitioner. Versus 20. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 2248 of 2010 Smt. Shakuntla Devi ....Petitioner. Versus 21. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 2249 of 2010 22. Smt. Anju Kumari ....Petitioner. 5 Versus State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 2250 of 2010 Smt. Shivan Devi ....Petitioner. Versus 23. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 2251 of 2010 Smt. Kiran Chandel ....Petitioner. Versus 24. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 2252 of 2010 Smt. Tripta Devi ....Petitioner. Versus 25. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 2253 of 2010 Smt. Lata Devi ....Petitioner. Versus 26. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 2254 of 2010 Smt. Sudesh Kumari ....Petitioner. Versus 27. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. CWP No. 2256 of 2010 Smt. Sneh Lata ....Petitioner. Versus 28. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. 6 CWP No. 2257 of 2010 Smt. Shakuntla Devi ....Petitioner. Versus 29. State of H.P. and others ......Respondents. These Writ Petitions are filed with the following prayer:- “ i) That the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the case of the present petitioner for regularize her services after her completion of 5 years service as Trained Nursery Teacher as per notification dated 2.2.1999 annexure P-3 issued by the State Government and followed by the respondent i.e. from the year 2002 instead from the year 206 as has been done by the respondent department without following their own instructions and keeping in view the judgment passed by this Hon’ble Court dated 5.4.2010 passed in CWP (T) No. 15627 of 2008 titled as Karuna Devi versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others with all consequential benefits.” 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court in CWP(T) No. 15627 of 2008, Smt. Karuna Devi vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others. It is seen that the petitioners have submitted Annexure P-6 representation before the first respondent. There will be direction to the first respondent to look into Annexure P-6 and take appropriate action in accordance with law and also in the light of the judgment referred to above within three months. In case the petitioners are situated as the 7 petitioner covered by Annexure P-7 judgment and in case the said judgment has become final similar treatment shall also be extended to the petitioners herein also. 3. All the Writ Petitions are disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice May 18, 2010 (Justice Surjit Singh), (rks) Judge.