511 <T''^ 5 r/e' If^. t&s^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTiSGARH W.P.(S) Ns^ / 2010 PETITIONER ^f^^ ^5^y Mrs. Rajani Nelson W/o Mr. J. M. Nelson, Aged about 50 years, Occupation - Principal Govt. Hir. Secondary School Hathkhoj Distt. Durg (CG). ,.^- <?< v^- VERSUS ^ ^^ESPONDENTS 1. Stateof Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur ^ (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA sn^r^i K.-u* sn^n ifliti ^lftd "s^'^iraRra,'®^wis.(«icii«i< ME..^l..^-i^ "ft^sr" &0 Hmwi aiiiti ^lt^l ^cfli3T yfid SB : HON'BLB MR. JUSTICE PRItIKKER DIWAKER OS.12.2010 Shri Vipin Tiwari, counsel for Shri Ajit Singh, P.L. for the Staj Counsel for the petitioner entitled to bene&t of two advance hawing passed B.Ed. examination afl cost. It is submitted that the issue ii no longer res integra. and the same Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case o^ SE Ors. 2009 (iII)MPJR (SC) 59. It is furtber submitted that thj view in its order dated 6.2.2009 pat Counsel for the petitioner further 29.4.2010 passed in Writ Appeal upon the judgment of the Supreme (supra) and the orderpassed by this 87/2009, directions have been issue(( grant of two advance increments 4! issued by the State of Madhya Prad^ pleaded in the petition. Counsel for the State submi would also be considered on the saml In view of above, the petition the respondent authorities to decid| grant of two advance ihcrements <nl<l[cl4f-l ''TN^ff ^ I^Zt' <f<l-^l< ^siPwOT^r (le petitioner. jte. (ubmits that the petitioner is lincrements on account of she |:er her appointment at her own livolved in the present petition is |ias been finally decided by the Aslia Saaiena Vs. State of M.P. |s Court has also taken a similar ised in W.P.(S) No. 6257/2008. submits that the order dated yo. 124/2009, wherein reiyinj Oourt in the case ofAsha Saaeaa ;ourt in another Writ Appeal No. for consideration of the case for [s per circular dated 21.9.1974 ih, after verification of the facts ts that case of the petitioners lines. s disposed ofwith a direction to the clain-i of the petitioner for s per circular dated 21.9.1974 fTff^ S'B?~f I-HC-22 •^31 -ill^lcfq, EiTflWlii. f^yiyy 31T^?T IRT^ ^^ tlllCTI th11«b '^ 200 l^y' an^T^l r^i.'b an^i sh+iicn'?rft^ v SIT^I'TOiRR'dfOT Pradesh issued by the State of Madhya pleaded in the petition within a It is made clear that this on merits of the case and the authotity to decide the same strictly in pericjd Coitt accordtnce chi<it(n41r( 'RPT^f ^ "fe^ {fai-^K ^; aipgi? sii^r after verification of the facts of eight weeks from today. has not expressed any opinion Concemed would be at Hberty with iaw. Sd/- z Pritmker Diwakar Judge r"^ '^Tr^