^ cy^~ IN THE HIGH_CQURT_Of_^^TTISG&KH_AT_ .BILASPUR W. P .No . SLS'^6 / 200 3 . ^ PSTITION8R ^r^. ^'^6? .^s^^"' tt- ^' t<^ ^^ RBSPONDENTS ^' -,^ s ^nand Lal Halwcii;;;.: S/o Shri Bodh Sai Halwai^ aged 55 years,Occupation-Lectuxler, Govt^Higtier secondary Scfaool, Tilakaj a,Distt»Xorba (C«G• ) VSiRSUS : 1» State of ChhLattisgarht Through i Secretary, Tribal Development :Deptt» Mlnistry ^D.K.S^ Bbawan, Raipur (C^G<)< 2. Director, Tribal Development Deptt* / Minxstry,D^K»S< Bhawan, Raipur (C<.0,)» 3. The con'imissioner, Tribal Development Department, Raipur (G.G,) WRIT^PBTxTIOHSR UI-JDER ARTICLSS 226 OP TMB CONSTITimON QF INDXA XI-HC-22 'TS? ^i^Krt^/ ^xi1^!<o, i^Knj^y ^TT^T^T ^ich ^nisr 5t)*ii<=b ^n ^ <><* ^?t5T '^SRt ^T^-^S'6/c^ Hl*«!(11 *^|Gb '^ 200 '^f^f' ^n^T'^RiT^R'iaftn 2,9.2003 <sbl4Sd^lr1 ^l^tdT ^ fe^t <Rr|^K IR'^qrf^W ^Ti^T Petitioner by Shri Prafull B|iarat, Advocate, Respoudents/State by Shri|Raiibir Snigh, Govt, Advocate, By this petitbu under Anjicle 226/227 of the CoD.stitutiou of petitiouer has chaUeu^ (Annexure P/1) by which he ha =d his traiisfer order dated 2.7.2003 ^ been fhjm. Boys Guvt, Higher Secondaiy School, Kilak^a, Korba to Govt, Higher Secoudaiy School, Bhalraiiigarh, Dautewad4 The grievaiice of fhi Lectarer of Ecoiiom.ics in Tilakd lectarers are sanctioued but at ]| The petitfoner is teachmg Ecouoi petittouer is that he is posted as ya School, Korba where 7 posts of |resent only 4 kctarcrs are workiag. ics to the stadeiits ofclass 11th aad 12th. lu spite of sao.ctioued ¥aca(it post of tectLirer in the school fhe Respondeut No.2 has issued th| counsel for the petitfoner subBiitl without aiiy exig^ucy and agaiiist th^ trausfer potlcy zbrmulaxed by the Govt, which| should be niade with the] been fh.at i^ Anuexure P/2 to but fhe has uot yet been de to fhe facts ciicum.staiK;es ^ ioipugiied transfer order, Leanied that fhe traiisfer beeu efiected that durmg the bau period coiicurrcuce of the Chief Miaister. It a baa. ou transfers, Leamed counsel for fhe pefitbuer the petitiouer has niade a ^he Commissiouer/Respoudent No.3 ^icled, heard leaoied coun^el for ftie parties aad havmg regaixi pf fhe case it is dirccted fhat the Respondeut No.3 decide t|w reprcseutatiou alrcady filed by the petifcfouer withia a period uf ^pO days from today, However the XI-HC-22 3:TT§RT^T f^-lJcb 3?T1^T 5t»Hi<sb ^Ra s-^ -^\.^JU^^ ^^iS.it^^E^.^, '3^? ^MH^I, ^Ti1<y<i<o, t^Kni^y 3ff^T ..2:£s?./.°2. Hl*icrll 5b^i<=b'*'"**"<"*<***'"< ^^F^ 200 '^re^T' 3TI^?T'^ffW^f^f petittoner is to ft| before the Respoudeut| today. If such rcpreseiitatiou Respondeut No.3 decide iy onler withm 30 da^ rcprcsentatiou rn.to cous&l petitioner, TiU fhe decisiou is traiisfer order qua petittouer will With the above observatiDnfe Consequently No. 2374/$( oL ch(^i<rl41<1 "RFI^Jf ^ 'fe^t <F<ait$« ^3iP<R3^[ |rther representauoii raismg all his |No,3 withiii a periocl of 10 days from is made by petittouer, the |e m. an objective maaner by rs from. fhe date of receipt of the leratiou all poiuts raised by the l^keii by fhe Respoudent No.3 the i^maiii iii abeyan.ee. is diaposed of finatly, '$003 and I.A. No. 7832/2003 also Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge