IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 51 OF 2009 SHRI. MAHESH SAVAIKAR ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. S. N. Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. Sapna Mordekar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. J. K. Mistry and Mr. V. R. Tamba, Advocates for respondent No.3. Coram:- P. B. MAJMUDAR & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 28th January, 2009 P.C. By filing this petition, which is titled as Public Interest Litigation, the petitioner prays that the State should continue providing safety measures at various beaches in Goa and that the present contract should not be terminated. In our view, this Court cannot grant a relief directing the State Government to continue the present contractor as it is for the State to consider whether a particular contractor has committed breach or not or whether the contract should be continued or whether the same to be put to an end and these issues cannot be considered in this writ petition. 2. However, so far as the grievance voiced by the petitioner to the effect that if the contract is terminated there will be lacuna in the matter of beach safety management is concerned, the learned Advocate General has stated that even at present respondent No.3 continues to provide the life guards at various beaches and in any event, the State will see to it that the safety measures are continued through any contractor or through the State machinery itself on their own. Since the State has disclosed its stand that appropriate measures are being taken and will continue to take at various beaches regarding the safety measures by providing adequate life guards and other safety equipments, nothing further is required to be done in the matter and realizing this, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing for any prayer in this petition. The petition is disposed off accordingly. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. ssm.