IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.7830 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision: 19.12.2011 Jaswinder Singh ......Petitioner(s) Versus Dr.(Mrs.) Jagdeep Kaur Khosla alias Jagdeep Grewal Khosla ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. K.S. Chahal, Advocate for the petitioner. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) This is tenant's revision petition challenging the impugned order dated 5.9.2011 whereby his application, for amending the application filed under Section 18-A of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act for grant of leave to defend, filed in a petition under Section 13-B of the Act on behalf of the respondent, has been dismissed. Amendment has been sought on the ground that earlier certain facts were not in the knowledge of the petitioner that the respondent- landlord owned other residential and non-residential properties and thus, the amendment of the application was necessary. It has been stated that the averments made in the application are fully supported from the certified copy of the documents which are sought to be relied upon by the petitioner. However, it is not in dispute that earlier also, the petitioner had filed an application for amendment in the application for leave to defend on the same averments. The said application was dismissed vide order dated 26.11.2010. The petitioner filed CR No.887 of 2011 against the aforesaid order. The said civil revision was also dismissed by this Court vide order dated 8.2.2011. While dismissing the said revision petition, this Court has observed that the pleadings which are sought to be incorporated in the CR No.7830 of 2011(O&M) -2- application under Section 18-A of the Act, are of no relevance. The Court also noticed that by filing application for leave to defend, the petitioner only wanted to delay the proceedings. Thus, I find no merit in this revision petition. Dismissed. December 19, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE