HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2103 of 2011 Date : 11.02.2011 Between : Suraj Kiran Kumar. …..Petitioner And The Superintendent of Police, Khammam & others. …..Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2103 of 2011 ORDER : In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks directions by way of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of respondents on his complaint, dated 05.12.2010, as illegal and arbitrary. The father of the petitioner and the fathers of respondents 3 to 7 are brothers. It appears, there are disputes between them with regard to the house bearing No.9-1-97, situated at Madhurabasthi in Kothagudem, and the suit for partition filed by the respondents in O.S.No.189 of 1988 before the Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Kothagudem, has ended in dismissal and the appeal filed by them in A.S.No.2332 of 1993 is pending before this Court. In this writ petition, it is the grievance of the petitioner that the unofficial respondents have scolded the petitioner when he has not agreed for sharing of properties, and inspite of lodging complaint before the Police on 5th of December 2010, they are not taking any action on the same, and on the other hand, they are directing the petitioner to settle the matter with the unofficial respondents. Based on the written instructions, dated 10.02.2011, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents that the respondents have not received any complaint on 5th of December 2010, as alleged by the petitioner. It is further submitted that they are not interfering with the possession of petitioner over the house bearing No.9-1-97 at Madhurabasti, Kothagudem in Khammam District. Although it is the case of the petitioner that he has lodged a complaint before the Police on 5th of December 2010, there is no material in proof of receipt of such complaint by the Police. When it is represented that the respondents have not received such complaint, and that they never interfere with the possession of petitioner over the property in question, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, permitting the petitioner to submit another copy of complaint, if he chooses so, before the Sub-Inspector of Police, I-town Police Station, Kothagudem, and if any such complaint is filed, the 2nd respondent-Station House Officer shall look into the same and take steps in accordance with law. This cannot be construed as a direction to register any crime, but the 2nd respondent to act only when he comes to the conclusion about commission of any cognizable offence by the unofficial respondents. Subject to above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 11th February 2011 N.B: Issue C.C. in three days. (b/o) ajr