IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1489/2011 ARUN N. DESHMUKH ..VS.. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, AMRAVATI & OTHERS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. D A T E : MARCH 25, 2011. Heard Shri Kasat, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Bodade, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. On hearing the learned counsel for the parties, it appears that both the authorities have recorded a finding of fact on a proper appreciation of the material on record that the notice of no-confidence motion meeting was duly served on the petitioner by pasting the same on the house of the petitioner in the presence of panchas. The authorities considered the statement of panchas and the report of the bailiff in regard to the service on the petitioner who was not present in the house at the relevant time. The authorities observed that eight persons who were present in the meeting voted in favour of the motion and the motion was passed against the petitioner. The statement made on behalf of the petitioner that the authorities ought to have held a through enquiry in the matter to consider whether the house on which the notice was affixed was belonging to the petitioner or his brother Pundlik is liable to be rejected as firstly the petitioner had not made a request of the said nature before the Collector and secondly, on the basis of the material available on record, the authorities had reached to the conclusion that the notice was duly served on the petitioner. Hence, for the reasons aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE SMP