1 S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.5837/2006 Date : 04.01.2007 HON'BLE MR.SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. D.S. Udawat for the applicant. Mr. V.R. Mehta, Public Prosecutor. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. The only contention raised by the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is an old lady of 80 years and submits that this factum has come in the impugned order itself. A perusal of the impugned order confirms the factum of the age of the applicant-grand-mother-in-law of the deceased. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 2 I have considered the submissions made before me. Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case while taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case and provisions of Section 437 Cr.P.C., I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that applicant Smt. Sita w/o Late Hemraj shall be released on bail in FIR No. 200/2006 P.S. Jaitaran, District Pali, provided she executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for her appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J.