THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Tr.C.M.P.No.526 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner is the wife of the respondent and they were married in the year 1998. Both of them are said to be from Anantapur District itself. The respondent filed O.P.No.88 of 2008 in the Family Court, Kadapa, against the petitioner, under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, for divorce. The petitioner seeks transfer of the same to the Family Court, Anantapur. She contends that it would be difficult and unsafe for her to travel long distance from Anantapur to Kadapa and that the O.P., was filed only to harass her. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Though the respondent is served with notice, he has not chosen to enter appearance. The allegation of the petitioner that the respondent is also resident of Anantapur District remains un-rebutted. Even otherwise, the convenience of a woman spouse becomes important in matters of this nature. The petitioner has narrated the type of harassment said to have been caused to her, when she lived with the respondent. Under these circumstances, the Tr.C.M.P. is allowed and O.P.No.88 of 2008 is transferred from the Family Court, Kadapa, if it is pending at that place, to the Family Court, Anantapur. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dated:02.09.2010 GJ