IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8956 of 2009 1. RINKU KUMARI, d/o late Raghunath Rai 2. Renu Devi, w/o Kamlesh Rai 3. Reeta Devi, w/o Amresh Rai 4. Amresh Rai, son of late Raghunath Rai All resiedents of village Saidpur Dumra, P.S. Patepur, District-Vaishali------ -----------------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.11171 of 2009 SHAILI DEVI, wife of late Raghunath Rai, resident of village-Saidpur Dumra, P.S. Patepur, Distt. Vaishali------------------------------------------------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that dispute was there for a boundary wall existing on the ancestral land. Both the agnates from common ancestor quarreled and that petitioners are lady members of the family though have been alleged for causing assault by means of danta or musal but not to the deceased. So their arrest cannot be justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Patepur P.S. case no.154 of 2008, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )