IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6733 of 2008 BEDANAND CHAUDHARY @ BEDO CHOUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 12.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is an accused for offences punishable under sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the uncle of co-accused Ranjeet Choudhary against whom the allegation is that he had developed illegal relationship with the deceased Lalita Devi, the second wife of Jhameli Paswan, and subsequently both of them married. The aforesaid case has been lodged by one Lal Paswan, who happens to be the son of Jhameli from his first wife. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the entire allegation against the petitioner is false and frivolous and all the family members of the said Ranjeet Choudhary have been implicated. Learned counsel for the petitioner also avers that there is no eye witness to the occurrence and only on the ground of suspicion the petitioner has been implicated. Learned counsel for the petitioner further contends that another co-accused Yoganand Choudhary has been enlarged on bail on the orders of this court dated 18.12.2007 passed in Cr. Misc. Case No.52031 of 2007. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed. Let petitioner, namely, Bedanand Chaudhary @ Bedo Choudhary be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of - 2 - Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Chhatapur P. S. Case No. 51 of 2007. harish (S.N. Hussain, J.)