-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO.1095 OF 2006 NO.1095 OF 2006 NO.1095 OF 2006 Smt Bharati Namdeo Mhatre ...Appellant v/s Smt Bamibai Vithal Patil and ors. ...Respondents Mr N.V. Bandiwadekar for Appellant. Mr R.B. Parab for Respondent No.2. Mr R.P. Walavalkar for Respondent Nos.3(b) to 3(k). CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 20TH JULY 2007. -2- P.C. :- 1. Both the Courts below have concurrently held that the will alleged to have been executed by the father of the appellant is invalid and has not been proved by the defendants. They are findings of facts. No substantial question of law arises. Appeal is rejected. Civil application No.341 of 2005 is disposed off. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Private Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. ------------------