IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1089 of 2007 SHIVCHANDRA PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 7 4.3.2009 Learned counsel is permitted to add S.P., Bettiah as party respondent no.7. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is the informant of Mahua P.S. Case No.79/05 dated 4.5.2005 under sections 365 and 366 (A)/34 of I.P.C. He has specifically made allegation against five accused persons named in the F.I.R. for abducting his minor daughter , namely, Ranju Kumari aged 13 years of age. The case was adjourned on 17.11.2008, 10.12.2008 and 12.1.2009 as well as on 28.1.2009 on the request of the State to enable them to take all effective measures to arrest the accused persons involved in kidnapping minor daughter of the informant. Learned State counsel has filed counter affidavit stating therein that the processes have already been filed against the accused persons. He further submits that as the accused persons are absconding and hiding in neighboring district , as such the warrant could not be executed. The plea that the accused persons are not residing in the concerned district would be no ground for not arresting the accused persons. The police will take recourse to all measures including one provided under section 79 of the Cr.P.C. for arresting the accused persons at the earliest. 2 It is submitted that accused persons are residing in the district of Bettiah. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the D.I.G., Muzaffarpur Range as well as S.P.,Bettiah, to ensure warrant of arrest is executed. With the aforesaid observation and direction this writ application is disposed of . It goes without saying that early arrest of the accused persons would ensure expeditious disposal of the trial. Let a copy of the order be handed over to A.C. to S.C.7. Anilksinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)