IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 19.11.2010 C.R.No.6803 of 2010 Lehmber Singh ...Petitioner Versus Major Ram and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Jatinderjit Kaur, Advocate, for respondent Nos.1 to 5. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) It is not disputed that two suits in respect of same property are pending before one Court, after the same were transferred by the learned District Judge. However, the grievance of the petitioner was that different dates are being given in the said two suits and one case is now fixed for arguments. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 5 states that the learned trial Court has fixed both the cases on the same date. Learned counsel for the parties agree that the arguments in both the suits should be heard on the same date after the parties conclude their entire evidence so as to avoid contradictory judgments. The learned trial Court shall jointly decide both the suits after the conclusion of the respective evidence of the parties in terms of the directions of this Court issued earlier, on or before 15.06.2011. In view of the said fact, no further orders are called for in the present revision petition. With the said observations, the revision petition is disposed of. 19.11.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE