IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13020 of 2008 Raj Nandan Roy, Son of Late Sukhdeo Roy, Resident of Village – Karath, P.S. – Masauri, Distt. – Patna. ……… Petitioner Versus 1. The Bihar State Electricity Board, through the Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 3. The Finance Controller, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 4. The Account Officer (Establishment), Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 5. The General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Patna Electric Supply Area, Patna. 6. The Superintending Engineer, Patna Electric Supply Circle, Patna. 7. The Joint Director, Account, Central Electrical Supply Area, Patna. 8. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division (Rural), Patna. ………. Respondents ---------------------------------- 2 18.11.2011 Heard Sri Ravindra Nath Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ratan Prasad Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the respondents. Sri Sinha, learned counsel for respondents submits that during the pendency of the writ petition grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed and such fact has been stated in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Board. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute the statement made by learned counsel for the Board. In view of stand taken by the parties there is no need to further keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)