1 f!?.g^mi 'iol/ Inthe Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisgarh, .P.No...'?^.t3....2006 'V. Petitioner - / K.S.Rajput (Khedu Singh Rajput) Aged®!years, Retired Head Clerk, Subedar (M) 8th Battalion, CISF, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus Resuondents ^ 1 ^y^- .^^/ /9^y z^y •'3- ./".^y>-" .^y'7 ^"" ^T ^. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Home Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Commandant, 8 Battalion, Ra^Banfig^iU (B.G .) Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts and Pension, SiOLnAi^i ^Sadl.'- Chowk/.XaipUr. . ^ Accountant General, Pagaria Building, ,/ Raipur(C.G.) ^ Writ Petition Under Articles 226/227 of The Constitution Of India for the issuance of WRIT in the nature of MANDAMUS certiorari. Prohibition and for other suitable writ or writs. order or orders. direction or directions. XI-HC-78 tTTOCIT SWTcti 3SC "41<llrt<<, ESiTn+l'IS, Rlrtwy m^--^^..^.^.A(>20o^ 31T^?TMa<h (lict!^a«tiiT) sn^r^rRFTR; OTT Sn^ST shHi* 4£- WtTwgfersn^r b^ Shri R.S. Shrivastava, couns4! Miss Dipa!i Pandey, Panei L^ on advance copy. Heard both the counsei. The main grievance raised petitioner retired from ths post of aftaining the age of supsrannuatioji ietter dated 27-12-2005 recommencjed psnsion to respondent No.3, but even anticipatory pension has not ^ directed to grant retirai benefrts i.^, Pension and interast of 18% be alsol Having heard iearned couns^ documents fited by ths petitioner ani? reoommsnded ths case of She pension, and aiso so far no retirai du| No.3 and 4 are directed to exan) entitiement of the retira! benefrts ant period of 2 months frorn today. in orders, the petitioner shali be entiti the petitioner at the prevalent rate w^ Wilh ihe direction aforesaid, '|i Consequentiy, M.(W.)P. No.: Parties are entilted for certffi^ Sd.l- L.C. Sf-.e'aoo Jurise +i<<t<'i'ifl-f t<wdT^'te^t<Ri'^i< ^iSlf^ITSn^I forthe petitioner. wyer for the State/respondents No.1 & 3, the petitioner in this petition is that the )4ead Cierk (Subedar) on 30-4-2006 on i.e. SO years. Respondenf No.2 vide gncjed the case of the petitioner for grant of s^ far no retiral dues has been paid and ^een granted, therefore, respondents be j. GPF, GIS, Leave Surrender, Gratuity, lawarded. ( for the petitioner, having considered the looking to the faot that respondent No.2 peljtioner to respondent No.3 for grant of i^s has been paid, therefore, respondsnts line the case of ths oetitioner for his p pass order regarding payment within a o^se, respondents No.3 and 4 fai! to pass for the interest on the amount due to je.f.1siAugust200S. |he petition stands disposed of. .2)742/2006 also stands disposed of. ^d copy of this order. -