IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4844 of 2010 1. RAKESH KUMAR S/O BHOLA PANDEY R/O MANPUR MOFASIL MORE, GAYA, BIHAR 2. SUNIL KUMAR S/O SITA RAM PASWAN R/O G-1, PATLIPUTRA RESIDENCY APARTMENT, ANANDPURI, WEST BORING CANAL ROAD, PATNA- 800001 3. ROHIT KUMAR S/O RADHA MOHAN PANDEY R/O G.S. COLONY, DORANDA, RANCHI, JHARKHAND 4. RAJESH KUMAR S/O BIRENDRA MISHRA R/O L.I.G. 167, LF/3 BLOCK NO.- 5, B.H. COLONY, PATNA- 26 5. ANURAG S/O KAMESHWAR PRASAD SINHA R/O LAXMI NARAYAN ROAD, CHOTI SARAIYAGANJ, MUZAFFARPUR, BIHAR 6. VIKRAMA RAI S/O LATE MANGAL RAM R/O VILL.- DANAHI, P.O.- BARMASHWA, VIA-TURKAULIA, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN, BIHAR- 845437 7. HARESH SINGH S/O RAM BACHAN SINGH FLAT NO.- 22, SECTOR- 3, BLOCK- II, BHC, MIC, KANKARBAGH, PATNA 8. RAKESH KUMAR S/O SRI LAKASHMAN PRASAD R/O RAMCHANDRAPUR, BIHARSARIF, NALANDA, BIHAR 9. ANIL KUMAR S/O NAGESHWAR PRASAD YADAV R/O GANDHI NAGAR, KANKARBAGH, PATNA- 20 10. CHANDRAMA RAM S/O LATE BHARAT RAM R/O QUARTER NO.- 37/3, LIG, BAHADURPUR COLONY, KANKARBAG, PATNA- 26 11. RAJEEV RANJAN S/O LATE VASUDEV PRASAD R/O FLAT NO.- 34, BLOCK NO.- 11, SECTOR- 3, BHC (MIG), KANKARBAGH, PATNA 12. RAJESH KUMAR S/O SRI RAM PRASAD R/O SANJAY GANDHI NAGAR, KANKARBAG, PATNA, BIHAR 13. NAGENDRA PRASAD S/O LATE JALAN SAH R/O FLAT NO.- 68, P.C. COLONY, KANKARBAG, PATNA- 20 14. SATYA PRAKASH S/O CHANDRADEV SINGH S.K.- 33. S.K. COLONY, KANKARBAGH, PATNA, BIHAR 15. MOHAN MURARI PRASAD S/O RAM PYARE PRASAD R/O DUJRA PAHALWANGHAT, PATNA- 1 Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPTT. OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION THROUGH ITS SECRETARY BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 4. THE CHAIRMAN BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 5. THE SECRETARY BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 6. DEPUTY SECRETARY-CUM-EXAMINATION CONTROLLER BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA ----------- 3/ 26/7/2010 After some argument learned counsel for the petitioners moulds his submissions to pray for the only 2 relief for a direction to the respondent Commission to consider his representation. If the petitioners as citizens have filed a representation before the Constitutional Body, the minimum that the Court expects is that it should be disposed off in accordance with law. The writ application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)