IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.856 of 2008 INDU DEVI Versus NAGESHWAR PRASAD VIDYARTHI ----------- 6. 21.5.2009 Perused the impugned order. I do not find any reason to interfere with the same as the learned Judge has read the probabilities arising out of the evidence of different witnesses correctly. He has taken into consideration the circumstances appearing therefrom and held that the petitioner had developed a clandestine relationship with a particular man. The evidence of the daughter of the petitioner was also considered who also stated the same facts. I am satisfied about the correctness of findings recorded by the court below and I do not find any reason to interfere with the same. The revision petition is dismissed in the above light. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )