IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28611 of 2010 MD. NASIM Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 17.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Two vehicles and a mobile set are recovered from inside and outside of petitioner’s joint house. His father stated about keeping of the vehicle there by co-accused Md. Taslima and Md. Taslima’s confession is about involvement in dealing such type of vehicles along with this petitioner also. Defence is to doubt the recovery on being the vehicle theft property of Chandi Police Station, District-Nalanda and filing of F.I.R. after five days of recovery. The detail is there as what happened. Raid was conducted by the Officer-In-Charge of Sadar P.S. Saharsa. He was well competent to lodge the case to Police Station that has been done. Circumstances appeared in the case disentitle the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)