WP(C) 1826/2008 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI Heard Mr. N. Dutta, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner, and Ms. BL Sinha, learned Govt. Advocate, appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 3. By order, dated 20.03.2008, issued by the respondent No.3, namely, Chief Executive Officer, Nagaon Zila Parishad, Nagaon, Balisatra Bi-Weekly Market was settled with the present petitioner for the year 2007-2008. It is the case of t he petitioner that for several reasons, he has not been able to run the market a nd that he needs to be given remission in the payment of kist money and also ext ension of the period of his settlement and that he has already made a representa tion, in this regard, on 28.04.2008, addressed to the respondent No.1, namely, C ommissioner & Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Panchayat and Rural Development D epartment, Dispur, seeking extension of his period of lease and also remission i n the kist money. While considering the case of the petitioner, what needs to be noted is that whi le extension of the period of lease is not possible, remission in the kist money can be granted by the Government in terms of the relevant provisions of law. In these circumstances, the petitioner’s representation, dated 28.04.2008, aforeme ntioned needs to be considered by the State respondents in accordance with law. Considering, therefore, the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justic e, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents, particul arly, respondent No.1, to examine and consider, in accordance with law, the peti tioner’s prayer for remission of kist money. The whole exercise, so directed, sh all be completed within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a co py of this order by the respondent No.1. The petitioner shall furnish to the res pondent No.1 a certified copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petit ion and annexures thereto within a period of one week from today. If the petitio ner feels aggrieved by the order(s), which may be passed by the respondents/auth orities concerned, the petitioner shall be at liberty to take recourse to such p rovisions of law as may be permissible.