WP No. 405(SS)2005 Hon’ble M. M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri M.C. Pant, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Counsel for both the parties have submitted that the controversy raised by means of this writ petitioner is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in writ petition no. 7212(S/S) 2001 Smt. Parvati Pandey vs. State of Uttaranchal & ors. Delivered on 21st January 2004, as such, the present writ petition may be decided in terms of the aforesaid decision. Keeping in view the aforesaid submission made on behalf of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is decoded in terms of the decision of this Court in writ petition no. 7212(S/S) 2001 Smt. Parvati Pandey vs. State of Uttaranchal & ors. Delivered on 21st January 2004. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) 21.04.2005: NCM: