IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.10702 of 2009 Date of Decision: 21.07.2009 Bhag Singh Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH Present: Mohd.Yousaf, Advocate for the petitioner ….. Jasbir Singh, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. On asking of the Court, Mr.A.K.Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner prays that a writ of mandamus be issued, directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 to take action against respondent Nos.4 to 9, for interfering in possession of the petitioner, without any justification. It is case of the petitioner that when the private respondents tried to interfere in his possession over the land, in dispute, father of the petitioner filed a Civil Suit and in that suit interim injunction was granted in favour of his father, holding him in possession of the land, in dispute. It was specifically ordered that he shall not be ejected otherwise in due course Civil Writ Petition No.10702 of 2009 of law. Private respondents went in appeal, which was dismissed. Now they, in connivance with respondent Nos.4 and 9, are not allowing the petitioner to enter into his land. The petitioner has filed a contempt petition. Despite that, official respondents are helping the private respondents in interfering in possession of the petitioner. Respondent No.4 has also initiated Calendra under Section 145 Cr.P.C. for appointment of a Receiver. During arguments, it transpires that by stating his grievance, the petitioner has already sent a representation to respondent Nos.2 and 3, which is still pending undecided. Mr.Sharma states that decision regarding pending representation of the petitioner shall be taken by the authorities concerned within a period of two weeks. In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of by issuing directions to respondent No.3 to take note of representation filed by the petitioner and decide it by passing a speaking order. SSP is directed to take note of orders, passed in favour of father of the petitioner by the Civil Court and then pass an order, restraining the official respondents not to interfere in private dispute of the parties. An opportunity of hearing be also granted to the private respondents before passing any order. Needful be done within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Copy of the order be supplied to the State counsel under signatures of the Court Reader for compliance. 21.07.2009 (Jasbir Singh) gk Judge 2