IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2008 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 12750 of 2008(P) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- PORINCHU, S/O. JOB, MUTTATHU HOUSE, PADINJARE CHALAKUDI, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE J.MATHAIKAL RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- GOPINATHAN, S/O. MADHAVAN NAIR, MAVATTU HOUSE, PADINJARE CHALAKUDI, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DIST. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.C. NO. 12750 OF 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 11th day of April, 2008. J U D G M E N T This writ petition is preferred with a prayer to declare that Ext.P1 injunction order is not applicable to the petitioner in respect of 14 Ares of land(10.25 cents) situated in Sy.No.144/2 of Chalakudy village owned and possessed by him as per Ext.P3 document. I am afraid this Court cannot entertain such a request under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Ext.P1 is an order of injunction issued against the defendant namely the writ petitioner. Order 39 Rule 4 of the CPC provides for setting aside, varying or modifying an order passed under Order 39 Rule 1 of CPC. I am informed such an application is filed. So, it is for the party to pursue that application for appropriate orders. Therefore I direct the Court below that if such an application is pending before the Court to consider and dispose it of as expeditiously as possible. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-