IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 13TH MARCH 2009 / 22ND PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 8193 of 2009(T) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- SUNEETHI SREE RENJANAN, S.S.R., PONGANDU P.O., KILIMANOOR. BY ADV.MR.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ATTINGAL. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 8193 of 2009 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 13th day of March, 2009 JUDGMENT Exhibit P1 is the permit that was granted in respect of stage carriage bearing registration No. KL-07/E 2725. By Exhibit P4 proceedings of the RTA, transfer of permit was allowed in favour of the petitioner. That transfer has not been endorsed so far. 2. In the meantime, the petitioner submitted Exhibit P2 application for replacement of the vehicle. Orders have not been passed. Petitioner states that during the pendency of proceedings, he was operating vehicle on the strength of temporary permit, the last of which is Exhibit P5 valid till 8/03/2009. As the period of Exhibit P5 has expired, the petitioner submitted an application for the reissue of temporary permit. Orders have not been passed on that application also. It is in these circumstances, this writ petition has been filed. 3. In view of pendency of proceedings as above, the grievance of the petitioner can be redressed if finality is given to the proceedings that are pending. Therefore the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions; W.P.(C) No. 8193/ 2009 2 That the respondent shall make endorsement in pursuance of Exhibit P4, on Exhibit P1 permit. Once endorsement is made as above, Exhibit P2 application made by the petitioner for replacement of the vehicle shall be considered and orders shall be passed thereon as well. This shall be done expeditiously as possible and at any rate within eight weeks of production of copy of this judgment. 4. It is directed that in the meanwhile orders on Exhibit P6 application for temporary permit shall be passed by the respondent within two weeks of production of copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE scm