IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M. No.23743-M of 2007 Date of Decision: 19.4.2007 Shweta Gupta and another ....Petitioners. Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents. Present:- Mr.Hitesh Sood,Advocate for the petitioners. **** S.S.SARON, J.(ORAL) The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for directing the respondents not to harass them. A further prayers has been made for directing the respondents No.1 to 5 to protect their life which is stated to be in danger at the hands of respondents No.6 and 7 who are the parents of petitioner No.1. The petitioners it is alleged have married among themselves on 19.2.2007 in accordance with Hindu Rites and ceremonies. Photographs showing the solemnisation of marriage have been placed on record as Annexure P-3. It is stated that the marriage of the petitioners is not to the liking of respondents No.6 and 7 who are the parents of petitioner No.1, therefore, there is likelihood of the petitioners being implicated in some false case. The police, it is stated, are raiding the house of petitioner No.2 and his parents have also been threatened. Both the petitioners it is stated are major and their marriage is not barred by law. Crl.M. No.23743-M of 2007 -2- After giving my thoughtful consideration to the contention raised it may be noticed that nothing has been placed on record to show that the petitioners have approached respondents No.2 to 5 in respect of their grievance as has been made in the present petition. In the circumstances, the present petition is liable to be disposed of with the direction that in case the petitioners approach respondents No.2 to 5 setting out their grievance as has been made in the present petition, the same would be looked into in accordance with law and un influenced by any observation made herein. The criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly. (S.S.SARON) April 19,2007 JUDGE Reema