IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2008 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1930 Crl.MC.No. 1114 of 2008() ---------------------------- M.C. NO. 4/2008 of SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, KASARAGOD AT KANHANGAD. PETITIONER: ------------ JIPPIYA JOY, PULIMOOTTIL HOUSE, CHITTARICKAL, HOSDURG TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.SUBHASH CYRIAC RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, RAM MOHAN PALACE COMPOUND, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHITTARICKAL, KASARAGODE. BY ADV. SRI. K.S. SIVAKUMAR, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR , J. ========================== CRL.M.C. No. 1114 of 2008 ========================== Dated this the 25th day of March, 2008. O R D E R The petitioner challenges Annexure 3 preliminary order passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Kasaragod at Kanhangad under Section 107 r/w Section 111 Cr.P.C calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why he should not be ordered to execute a bond for Rs.10,000/- with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to keep the peace for a period of one year. 2. Admittedly, the petitioner has entered appearance pursuant to Annexure 3 preliminary order. The petitioner is permitted to appear through his counsel and substantiate his contentions in support of the cause in absentia and the Magistrate shall insist on the personal appearance of the petitioner under Section 115 Cr.P.C only if it is found inevitable at any stage of the proceedings. This Crl.M.C is disposed of as above. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv