IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA *** WRIT PETITION NO. 141 OF 2003 Shri Pratapsingh Rauji Rane, Vithalpur, Sanquelim, Goa, ... Petitioner. Versus 1. Shri Jitendra Zoiba Rane, Vithalpur, Sanquelim, Goa, 2. Mrs. Jitendra Z. Rane, Vithalpur, Sanquelim, Goa, 3. Shri Sanjay Zoiba Rane, Vithalpur, Sanquelim, Goa and 4. Smt. Vimalabai Zoiba Rane alias Sanyogita Zoiba Rane, Vithalpur, Sanquelim, Goa. ... Respondents. Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, with Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. S. G. Bhobe, advocate for the respondents. CORAM : S. J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 10th April, 2003. ORAL JUDGMENT Rule returnable forthwith. By consent the Writ Petition is taken up for final hearing. 2. The impugned judgment permits the respondents to recall their witnesses for further examination. The learned advocate for the petitioner invited my attention to the judgment of this Court in Smt. Rosa Esmenia Moraes Smt. Rosa Esmenia Moraes Smt. Rosa Esmenia Moraes & Anr. vs. Smt. Concessao Pereira, 1997(2) Goa L.T. & Anr. vs. Smt. Concessao Pereira, 1997(2) Goa L.T. & Anr. vs. Smt. Concessao Pereira, 1997(2) Goa L.T. 364 364 364. - 2 - 3. The interests of justice would be met if the learned trial Judge follows the procedure laid down in the said judgment inter alia, by permitting the respondent to furnish proofs of evidence to be put to the respondents. Needless to add that the petitioner shall be entitled to cross-examine the witnesses thereafter. The impugned Order is hereby set aside and is substituted by this Order. Rule made absolute. There shall be no order as to costs. S. J. VAZIFDAR,J. mc.