IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 9839 of 2004 Between: 1 H.P.Vedavyas Achar, S/o.Late Pranesh Achar, R/o.B91, SWameerapuram, M.G.K.Moorthy Layout, 6th Main, Chamarajapet,Bangalore. 2 G.K.Achar, S/o.Late Raja S.Gururajacharya, R/o.438, 6th Main, 2nd Cross, Banashankari 3rd phase, Bangalore 3 Janardhan Achar, s/o.Raghavendrachar, R/o.Vadiraja Nilaya, Kempegowda Nagar, Bangalore. 4 S.N.Sridhar, S/o.Late K.G.Narasimha Swamy, R/o.17/1, Sri Krishna, 1st Floor, Anjaneya Temple 1 street, Seshadripuram, Bangalore. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Sri Raghavendra Swamy Mutt, Mantralayam, Yammiganoor Taluk,Kurnool Dist. 2 State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Religious Endowments, Tilak Road, Boggulakunta, A.P.Hyderabad. 4 H.H.Sri Sri Sushameendra Theertha Swamiji, Pontiff of sri Raghavendra Swamy Mutt, Mantralayam-518345, Yammiganoor Taluk, Kurnool Dist. 5 H.H.Sri Sri Suvidyendra Theertha Swamiji, (Sri Guruvenkatachar in his Poorvasharama), Claiming to be the pontiff of Sri Raghavendra Swamy Mutt, Mantralayam- 518345, Yammiganoor Taluk, Kurnool Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction calling for the records in proceedings in Rc.No.12/20889/2002, dt.7-11-2002 confirming the order in O.P.No.40422/2002, dt.4-10-2002, and quash the same as they are not in consonance with law and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.V.SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the respondent Nos.1,4 and 5: Mr.P.V.R.Sharma. The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.9839 OF 2004 ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for respondents 4 and 5 that the respondent No.5 has already tendered his resignation. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also placed before me the proceedings of the Commissioner of Endowments, dated 9.7.2004 accepting the resignation of the 5th respondent. In view of the same, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that no further adjudication is necessary in this writ petition. Accordingly, recording the same the writ petition is closed. No costs. 09.8.2004. mdaa. Copy to: 1. State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of Religious Endowments, Tilak Road, Boggulakunta, A.P.Hyderabad. 3. Two C.Cs. for G.P.for Endowments, High Court of A.P., High Court Building, Hyderabad (OUT). 4. Two C.D.Copies.