IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS THURSDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2011 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 120 of 2011(S) -------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- SABEENA BEEVI, D/O.ABDUL SALAM, AGED 35 YEARS, SABEENA NIVAS, ALIYIRAKKA, CHILAKKOOR, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695141 BY ADV. SRI.J.S.AJITHKUMAR SRI.S.ASWAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE POOYAPPALLI POLICE STATION,OYOOR, P.O. KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DIST-691101 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL) KOLLAM DIST-691001 3. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 4. ABDUL BASHEER, S/O.IBRAHIM AGED 62, MELEVILA VEEDU, H.B.MANZIL, ROAD VILA CHERIYA VELINE, P.O. KOTTARAKKARA , KOLLAM DISTRICT-691101 5. NAZIMUDIN, S/O.AZEEZ, AGED 45 YEARS, KHURAISHI MANZIL, ROAD VIA MELEVILA, OYOOR, KOTTARAKKARA P.O., KOLLAM DIST-691101 W.P.(CRL).NO.120 OF 2011 S 6. SAJLA BEEVI, W/O.NAZIMUDIN, AGED 37 YEARS, KHURAISHI MANZIL, ROAD VILA MELEVILA OYOOR,KOTTARAKKARA P,.O., KOLLAM DIST-691101 R1 TO R3 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI C. M. KAMMAPPU. ADV. SRI.V.JAYAPRADEEP FOR R4-6 SMT.SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI FOR R4-6 SRI.SANEESH KUNJUKUNJU FOR R4-6 SMT.V.V.RISANI FOR R4-6 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M. JOSEPH & M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(CRL).NO.120 OF 2011 S ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 31st March, 2011 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. Petitioner is the mother of the alleged detenu Ms. Safna. The alleged detenu is the daughter from her marriage with the son of the fourth respondent. There is no dispute that the son of the fourth respondent has divorced the petitioner. 2. Pursuant to the Order dated 14.03.2011, the alleged detenu was produced before us. We interacted with her. She would say that she does not wish to go with the petitioner. We allowed the alleged detenu to interact with her mother, the petitioner, for some time. Again, we interacted with the alleged detenu. The alleged detenu would reiterate that she does not want to go with the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would bring to our W.P.(CRL).NO.120/2011 S 2 notice that the petitioner has filed O.P. No.78 of 2011 before the Family Court, Nedumangad and the Family Court has also directed production of the alleged detenu before it on 05.04.2011. 4. As far as this Writ Petition is concerned, we do not detect any illegal detention. We close this Writ Petition. This will be without prejudice to the rights of the parties to seek appropriate remedies before the appropriate Forum. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/= M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE kbk. //True Copy// W.P.(CRL).NO.120/2011 S 3