IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.7917 of 2007 Between: Narender Kumar Gupta & others. … Petitioners And The Govt., of A.P., rep., by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri B. Muralidhar for Sri C. Hnumantha Rao Counsel for respondents 1-12: AGP for Home The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.7917 of 2007 ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal having regard to the nature of the writ petition. In this writ petition, the petitioners sought for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of the police in implementing order dated 27.12.2006 in I.A.No.5453 of 2006 in O.S.No.2705 of 2006 on the file of the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy. The petitioners also sought for a consequential direction to the police to extend the aid as per the abovementioned orders of the civil Court. In ordinary course, the writ petition deserves to be dismissed in view of the view taken by this Court in Vadlakonda Narender Vs. Station House Officer[1], as the petitioner has straight away filed this writ petition for implementation of the order of the civil Court without first approaching the said Court for police aid. At any rate, the learned counsel representing respondent Nos.13 to 18 submitted that the disputes between the petitioner and respondent Nos.13 to 18 have been settled after filing of the writ petition and that therefore the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The above submission of the learned counsel is placed on record and the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. However, if the disputes still subsist, the petitioners shall be free to approach the civil Court first before availing their remedy by invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.10162 of 2007 and WVMP.No.1107 of 2007 are also disposed of as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 14.06.2010. ES [1] 2009 (5) ALT 426