Sing!e Bmmh ’ C27 Qzp/ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIONIS) No. 6335/01? 2009 ($3.) PETITIONERS :— 1., ‘wSmt. Chinu Barman W/o Shri Dhirendra Nath Barman, aged about 4O years, Occupation — Service, posted as Assistant Teacher, Kanya Ashram, Bastanar, Tahsil Bastanar, District Bastar (C.G.). R/o Banmali Laxmi Niwas, Behind Avantika colony, Frazerpur, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). 2w/Ku. Purnima Verma D/o Late Shri f RS. Verma, aged about 42 years, occupation— Service, posted as Assistant Teacher, Kanya Ashram Bastanar, Tahsil Bastarnar, District Bastar (C.G.) R/ o C/ o Smt. Kamla ‘Verma, Garhpara, Barsur, District Dantewada (CG.). 3M. Mohan Kumar S/o Shri M. Ramnaiyya, aged about 4O years, occupation— Service, posted as Assistant Teacher, Kanya Ashram Bastanar, Tahsil Bastanar, District Bastar (C.G.}. R/o c/o Vinod Jain Advocate, Behind Atithi Hotel, Frazerpur, Jagdalpur (C.G.). z ; VERSUS RESPONDENTS :—V 6/ a1”. State Secretary, of Chhattisgarh, Tribal through Welfare Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Commissioner, Tribal Welfare and Development, Raipur (C.G.). Collector, District Collectorate, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). Formal Party 4. TheVSecretary, Mata Rukhmani Sewa Sansthan Sarniti, Dimrapal, Tahsil 85 District Jagdalpur (C.G.). §$H CQURT GF CHHA?T3S$ARH : BlLAsPUR WRIT PET§TSQN $3} NG. 5295 CF 2G0§ (Writ petition under Articie 226 of the Constitutian of inciia) $ingie Bench : Han’bie Shri Saiish K. Agnii'iotri, J. $hri Amiya Kant Tiwari, counsel far the petitioners. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dv. Advoca‘ie Generai fGr the State. QRQER GRAL {Passed 0n this '1E‘ day of September, 2&9) ’i. With the cansent 0f ieamed caunsei appearing fOf the arties, the petition is heard fmaiiy. 2. Learned caunsei appearing fer the petitionefs submiie that the instant petition is squareiy covereti by the decision of this Court rendered in $mt. A. Lati v. State of Ghhattisgarh & Othere‘, thus the petitioners may be permitted to make e reeresentation to decide their cases in the iight of afcre—stated decisiorr, subiect to verification asto whether the respondent Nc.4 Institute is a Government aided schooi and the petitioners are the teachers within the sanctioned streergtii. Learned counsel aooearino for the State submits that in the event, the petitioners make a representation, the same wiii be considered and decided, in aocordenoe with iaw: within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt oi the representation. 4. in View of foregoing, according to the iearned counsei appearing r‘or the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition fo adjudication. 5. Aocordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of. i Sd/- " Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Present :- Gowri " 2oo7 (i) sLJ 265 p r PETmGNERS Smt. China Barman & 0thers Versus RE5PON§ENTS State 0f Chhawsqarh & Others