fflGH COCRT OF CGBIATTISGARHAT BILASPUR WritPeti(iBnMNo.669of2(XW I^TmQNERS : 1. Bhagwat Prasad Todar, agedaboujt 47 years, son ofShri Swaroop Das, Woriang as Upper Division Teacher, Govennnent Higher Secoadaiy School Ganiyari, Tahsil Takhatput, Distt. Bilaq)ur <CG). 2. Sabha Bam Singaur, aged about 49 yeais, son of Shri Jhallaram Smgaur, wwking as 'Assistaht Teacher, Govamneiit Priniary School Lamer, Vikas Klumd TaIdia(pur,Distt. Bilaspur (CG). 3. Devsahai Amo, Aged about 46 years, son of Late Aasharam Amo, working as Upper Division Teacha-, Govemment Hi^ier Secondary School Ganiyari, Tah. Takhalpur, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). 4. Jamuna Prasad Dewangan, aged about 45 yeara, son of Shri Sadhu RatD, working as Assistant Teacher, Govemment PrimarySchool Narotikapa, Tah. Takhatpur, Distt.Bilaspuf(CO). 5. Chamatu Lal Kaudiik, aged about 47 years, son of late Baswan Lal Kaushik, woAing as Assistant Teacher, Govemment Primary School Newra, Vikas Khand Takhatpui, Distt. Bilaspur (03). 6. Ashok Kuniar aged about 44 yeais «>n of Shr Gauruhankar Pandey, workmg as Assistattt Teacher, Govemment Primary Sehool Bharari, Vikas Khand Takha^ur JXstt. Baaspur (CG). 7. Dwarika Prasad Yadav; aged about 45 yeare, son of Late Dashrath Lal Yadav, woridng as Assistant Teacher, Govemment Primary School Darrikapa, Vikas Khand Takha^ur, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). 8. Awdhesh KutBar Pandey, aged about 47 years son ofShri Mudrika Prasad Pandey, Woifcing as Assistant Teacher, Goveroment Pritnary School TAuda, Vikas Khand Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). VERSUS RE8PONDENTS : 1. StateofChhattisgarh, Throu^i:1faeSecTetaryDepartmfflitof Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Sin^i Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The District Education Officer, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspiu- (CG). 3. Assistant Comnussioner, Deptt. ofTribal Welfare, Bilaspur Distt.Bilaspur(CG). ^ . (WRTT PETmON tTNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CpNSTTTUTION OF INDIA) fSB: Hon'MeMr.SalishK.Aemhotri.J.y Present : ShriF.S. Kluu'e,Advocateforthepetitioners; Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. AdvocateforlfaeState/respondents. Safau 4. w^ ORALORDER (Passrf <m 01st ofFebrnary, 2008) The petitioners were appointedimtially, on a fixed pay ofRs. 150/-. Tte petitionas were thereafter, granted regularpay scale on completion oflhe probation period. The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitionere are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date ofinitialappouitment or finm the date ofcompletionofprobatiQnperiod. Leamed eounsel appearing for the petitionere as wfell as for the State/respbndents jointly subnut that tfae facts mid question of law involved in the present writ petition are tlie same as to that of in W.P.(S) No. 5976/2006 (SushU Tbrari and othere Vs. State Govenunent of Clihattfa^arh & Others), whieh was allowed vide order dated 07.11.2006. fa view ofthe above-stated subnussions made by leamed counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms i.e. petitioners are entitled regular payscale with efiFect fixim the date of initial appointment, subjecttoverificationofthefacts. Noorder asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri ^•:^_ Judge 11~