1 NMA No.994 of 2010 in Appeal No.154-10 mmj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.994 OF 2010 IN APPEAL (L) NO.154 OF 2010 IN NOTICE OF MOTIONNO.358 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1755 OF 2007 Damaji Ganpat Mankar ..Appellant Vs. M/s. Arora Combines & Anr. ..Respondents Ms Gayatri Singh for the Appellant Mr P.R. Yadav i/b Mr. S.S. Pathak for the Respondents CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & R.M.SAVANT,JJ. DATE :- 27th OCTOBER ,2010 P.C. 1 Perused Motion 2 Heard the Learned Counsel for the parties. 3 By consent of parties, delay of 94 days in filing the Appeal is condoned. 4 The Appeal was heard for admission by consent of parties. The Learned Counsel for the Appellant tried to put her interpretation on Section 17(b) of the Industrial Dispute Act (the Act) to support her contention that even in the case of award of compensation in lieu of reinstatement, provision 2 NMA No.994 of 2010 in Appeal No.154-10 of Section 17(b) of the Act is applicable. The very same submission made before the learned Single of this Court is rejected by a well reasoned order impugned herein. The view taken therein is a reasonable and plausible view. No perversity could be demonstrated by the learned counsel appearing for the Appellant either through her oral submission or through the grounds raised in the Memorandum of Appeal. No case is made out to entertain this Appeal. 5 In the result, the Appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (R.M.SAVANT,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)