IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.14902 of 2011 Date of Decision : August 16, 2011. Harpreet Kaur and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.P.S.Jammu, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter-reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioners are said to have missed the second counseling held on 7.7.2011 for the posts of Punjabi Mistresses/Assistant Librarian allegedly for the reason that the date of second counseling was put on the web-site and the petitioners for want of Internet facilities did not come to know the same. The petitioners further allege that as a result of their non- CWP No.14902 of 2011 [2] appearance in the second counseling, the candidates lower in merit have been selected. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I am of the considered view that the plea taken by the petitioners requires sympathetic consideration by respondent No.2. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to treat this writ petition as a representation on behalf of the petitioners and consider their request in accordance with the Rules as early as possible but not later than one month from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. The petitioners are directed to deposit a copy of this writ petition with the Registry to enable it to send the same alongwith the certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 16, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE