vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO.5 OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO.5 OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO.5 OF 2008 2008 2008 Pavithra Murali ... Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Ms.Pavithra Murali, Petitioner-in-person Mr.N.P. Pandit, AGP, for Respondents CORAM: J.N. PATEL & J.N. PATEL & J.N. PATEL & SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. MHATRE, JJ. MHATRE, JJ. DATED: MARCH 3, 2008 MARCH 3, 2008 MARCH 3, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . We heard the petitioners in person at length. This Court has pointedly asked the petitioners as to how this petition be considered as a public interest litigation. It is their contention that it relates to atrocities on women and secondly harassment to the institution. 2. In our opinion the institution can on personal level seek remedies available to them under the law and prosecute them as there are sufficient safeguards available. 3. We have been informed that one international syndicate has bribed the public prosecutor Mr.Borulkar and the police authorities are harassing the petitioner : 2 : and others from the institution. It is further contended that this international syndicate controls the fate of five nations like New Zealand, Australia, Sweden and Canada and so on. Well this is beyond our purview, though according to the petitioner, it directly concerns the national security. We, therefore, dismiss this petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum. 4. We are required to dispose of this petition by making the aforesaid observation as the petitioner who is appearing in person does not find it appropriate to engage an advocate or educate the Court on issues which she wants to highlight in public interest. These observations are made by keeping in mind judicial restraint considering the subject matter which is agitated in the petition. 5. Petition is disposed of accordingly. 6. In view of the dismissal of the petition, nothing remains in Chamber Summons No.39 of 2008 and Notice of Motion No.93 of 2008 and the same are dismissed accordingly. (J.N. PATEL, J.) : 3 : (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.)