HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION No. 14872 OF 2000 Thursday, the Nineteenth day of August Two Thousand and Ten Between K.V.N.L. Seetha Kumari and others Petitioners AND The Commissioner and Director of Intermediate Education, Govt. of A.P., Nampally, Hyderabad and another Respondents ORAL ORDER: The present writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners working in the second respondent college, as Junior Lecturers in Telugu and Zoology, in terms of G.O. Ms. Nos. 302 dated 23.8.1991 and 362 dated 7.10.1994 and to accord them all the consequential benefits. The first petitioner was appointed as Part Time Lecturer in Telugu in the second respondent college on 10.8.1994, the second petitioner was appointed as Part Time Lecturer in Telugu in September, 1989 and the third petitioner was appointed as Part Time Lecturer in Zoology in 1990 and they are working presently against Grant-in- Aid posts. While so, it is stated that the first respondent is proposing to transfer lecturers from other Private Colleges and post them in the vacancies in which the petitioners are working. As such sought for the direction, as stated supra. Learned Government Pleader basing on the counter affidavit submits that the Part Time Lecturers have to satisfy the condition No.5 stipulated in G.O. Ms. No. 328 Education dated 15.10.1997, which has superseded all the Government Orders issued earlier in that context. Condition 5 of the said G.O. reads as under: “.. Those who have put in a service of three academic years as on 30.7.1991 or five academic years as on 25.11.1993 as the case may be, and also continuing in service on the date of issue of the orders (i.e. G.O. Ms. No. 328 Education, dated 15.10.1997) are eligible for regularization. Further the part-time Lecturers should be put in 360 working days as on 30.7.1991 and 600 working days as on 25.11.1993 for regularization…” It is further stated by him that the petitioners have not fulfilled the conditions stipulated in the said G.O. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are continuing as Part Time Junior Lecturers in the second respondent college. Under the above circumstances, suffice it to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for regularization of their services, if they are otherwise eligible, in accordance with the Rules. With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. ________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari August 19, 2010 MAS