MC 3385/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI Heard Mr. G. N. Sahewalla, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the app licant, Mr. A. K. Goswami, learned Senior Counsel, appearing on behalf of the wr it petitioner, Mr. P. K. Roy, learned counsel for the F.C.I. amidst Officers and Mr. U. C. Saikia, learned counsel for the respondent No.7 in the writ petition. Considering the fact that the applicant is an awardee of the contract in the ten der process in which the writ petitioner too had participated, this Court is of the view that, in the facts and attending circumstances of the present case, the impleadment of the applicant is necessary in order to effectively dispose of th e writ petition. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the prayer for impleadment, made by the applicant, is hereby allowed. The applicant shall be added as respo ndent No.8 in the writ petition. With the above observations and directions this Misc. Case stands disposed of.