IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 1443 of 2008 Between: 1 Daypa Shekar Reddy, S/o Ranga Reddy, R/o H.No.23-98 2 Kavitha, W/o Shekar Reddy, R/o H.No.23-67 3 Samanta Suparna, W/o Gopal, R/o H.No.23/152/16 4 Menu Giri, W/o Sanjay Kumar Giri, R/o H.No.23-152/17 5 S.Swarnalatha, W/o Murali Krishna, R/o H.No.23-53/9/127 6 S.Murali Krishna, S/o Laxmi Narsaiah, R/o H.no.23-53/9/29 7 K.Bhoolaxmi, W/o Kumara Swamy, R/o H.No.23-53/9/28 8 K.Kumara Swamy, S/o K.Balaiah, r/o H.No.23-53/9/30 9 J.Saritha, W/o Sainath, R/o H.No.23/152/1 10 S.K.Sumalatha, w/o S.K.Ramu, r/o H.No.23-66 11 S.K.Ramu, s/o Devadiga, R/o H.No.23-99, All are residents of Shanthinagar, Jawahar Nagar Shamirpet, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranga Reddy (East Division), Ranga Reddy, Hyderabad. 3 The Tahasildar, Shamirpet, R..R.District, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondents in orally threatening the petitioners to evict their houses bearing Nos.23-98, 23-67, 23-152/16, 23-152/17, 23-53/9/127, 23- 53/9/29, 23-53/9/28, 23-53/9/30, 23-152/1, 23-66, 23-99 situated at Shanthi Nagar, Jawahar Nagar Gram Panchayat Shamirpet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the cases of petitioner in the light of G.O.Ms.No.515 dated 19-04-2003 and also direct not to demolish the houses of the petitioners and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.GIRI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : Oral order: The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioners are, however, at liberty to institute appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum and by a properly constituted and drafted proceedings in respect of any subsisting right. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 22nd April, 2009. GRR