IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 13680 of 2002 Between: K. Vijaya W/o. K.P.Reddy Resident of 8-2-269/S/36, Sagar Society, Shaikpet Village, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Shaikpet Mandal, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in interfering with petitioners' carrying on construction activity in the premises bearing No. 8-2-269/S/16 on plot No. 16 and Sy.no. 129/97 and 129/110 in the lay out of Sagar Cooperative Housing Society, situated at Shaikpet Village, Road No. 2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad in spite of the sanctioned plan of the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad vide permit No. 20/80 in File No. 269/S/16/2/8/2002 dated 4-7-2002, as illegal, arbitrary and unjust by issuing appropriate writ, order or direction and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.V.S.SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondent in interfering with the petitioner’s construction activity in premises bearing Nos.8-2-269/S/16 on Plot No.16, S.No.129/97 and 129/110 in the layout of Sagar Cooperative Housing Society, Shaikpet village, Road No,.2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad as illegal. At the hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue raised in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court dated 20.07.2004 in W.P.No.24401 of 2001 and batch whereby this Court while declaring that interference of the Mandal Revenue Officer, Shaikpet in preventing construction activity was illegal gave liberty to the respondents therein to approach the Special Court constituted under the provisions of A.P. Land Grabbing (prohibition) Act, 1982 and obtain appropriate orders regarding the construction that is being carried on by the petitioners. The learned Government Pleader for Revenue has not disputed this statement. In view of the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the said order with a direction that the said order shall be treated as part of this order. As a sequel to disposal of the main petition, WPMP No.17027 of 2002 is disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ (C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.) 18th February, 2009 Js.