^e HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHiBiLASPUR Writ Petltion(S)No.413 of2S08 Petitloraers Respondents 1) Sukh Dev Kumar Kurre, Aaed 52 y@ars, S/o. Shri Fhagun Das Kurre, Assistant Teacher, Primary Schooi, Bhalsatara, Distnct Rajnandgaon (CG). 2) Ghan Shyam Singh Sangar, aged 45 years, S/o. Shatrughan Sangar, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Khatl, Block Saja, D.Ed.O. Bematare, District Durg, C.G. 3) Ghanshyam Ukey, aged 47 years, S/o. Late Shri Mhatter Ukey, Assistant Teacher, Govt. yiddle Schooi, Leeteya, District Rajnandgaon (CG). 4) Santosh Singh Rajput, aged 45 years, S/o. Shri Khedu Singh, Assistant Teacher, Govt. yiddle School, Singhore, D.Ed.O. Bematare, District Durg (CG). 5) Sushll Kumar Deepak, aged 43 years, S/o. Shri Qopi Lal Deepak, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middie Schooi, Hatrakha, D.Ed.O. Bematare, District Durg (CG). Versus 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) The State Qovernment of ChhatSisgarh, through the Secretary, Educatlon & Tribai Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). Assistant Commissioner, Tribai Welfare Department, Rajnsncigaon Th® District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, (CG). The District Education Officer, Durg (CG). Director of Pubiic Instruction, Raiputr O^Vrit Petition under Art 226 of the Constitution of India) SB: Hon'bSe IVSr. Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Present: Shri SomkantVerma, counsei for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL (Passed on 22nd January, 2008) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petltioners as weil as for the State/respondents Jointly submit that the fect and question of iaw invoived In the present writ petition are the same to that of In Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Nlynlcipa! Corporation, Durg and another (2008 (II) KSPJR -CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 3-4-2006. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. 2. Accordingly, the writ petltion is ailov/ed In terms of the order passed In the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. MunlcipaJ Corporation. Durg and another (supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed., Examinatlon Certificate on thelr own expenses as per the circuiars dated 24-12-1998 and further whether they have been paid two advance Incrsments or not. No order as to costs. — Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Raju