IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2009 / 15TH POUSHA 1930 RP.No. 1312 of 2008(E) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.33646/2008 Dated 25/11/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- K.K. JOY, KOOMULLIL HOUSE, VETTIKKAL P.O., MULANTHURUTHY BY ADV. SRI.N.K.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, CIRCLE TELECOM STORES DEPARTMENT (CT ST COMPLEX), GANDHI NAGAR, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, SURVEYAND EXCESS NET WORK, ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.MATHEWS K.PHILIP,SC, BSNL FOR R1 & 2 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- R.P.1312/2008 in W.P.(C).33646/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 5th day of January, 2009 ORDER I had declined jurisdiction in the writ petition, taking note of clause 5.1.1 of the agreement which provides for an arbitration of any question, dispute or difference arising under the agreement or in connection therewith. The Chief General Manager, Southern Telecom Project, is named as arbitrator. Learned counsel for the petitioner expresses apprehension that the dispute arising on termination of the agreement may not be comprehended by the arbitration clause. Mr.Mathews K.Philip submits that there is no basis for the said apprehension and the dispute as to the validity of the termination would also be comprehended by the arbitration clause. Submission is recorded. I do not find any ground to review the judgment. Accordingly, the Review Petition is dismissed. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs