THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.2378 OF 2010 ORDER The revision petitioner is husband of the first respondent and father of the minor second respondent. There is no dispute about the relationship between the parties. There is also no dispute about both parties living separately since prior to filing of the maintenance case in the lower Court. The Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District by the impugned order dated 03-12-2010 in M.P.No.324 of 2009 in M.C.No.149 of 2009 awarded interim maintenance of Rs.4,000/- p.m to the wife and Rs.2,000/- p.m to the minor child. It is contended by the petitioner’s counsel that the revision petitioner is jobless person and that he has no avocation and that the respondents have failed to prove his income in the lower Court. According to the respondents, at the time of marriage with the first respondent, the revision petitioner was working for HDFC Bank; subsequently, he resigned for setting up his own business; after some time, the first respondent joined in ING Vysya Bank and worked for that bank; and again left the job for doing some business. Thus, the revision petitioner has got potentiality to do business and confidence for doing the same. Having regard to the status of the parties, granting of interim maintenance of Rs.4,000/- and Rs.2,000/- per month to the respondents 1 and 2 respectively is in no way unreasonable or unjust, much less illegal. The order passed by the lower Court does not suffer from any infirmity. Hence, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. _________________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU,J Rkk Dated: 27-12-2010