IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2011 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 4399 of 2011() ------------------------- (AGAINST FIR NO.1783/2011 OF PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION) ......................... PETITIONER(S): 1. M/S.RELIGARE SECURITIES LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, 19, NEHRU PALACE, NEW DELHI. 2. SANDEEP JUNEJA, VICE PRESIDENT (OPERATIONS), M/S.RELIGARE SECURITIES LTD., SAKET, NEW DELHI. 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER, M/S.RELIGARE SECURITIES LTD., THADIKARAN CENTRE, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI. 4. KESAVADAS K.P., SOPANAM, VELLANGITHOPPIL ROAD, NEAR CHINMAYA HSS, KANNANKULANGARA P.O., THRIPOONITHURA, KOCHI - 682 301. 5. SREEKUMAR, SOPANAM, VELLANGITHOPPIL ROAD, NEAR CHINMAYA HSS, KANNAKULANGARA P.O., THRIPOONITHURA, KOCHI - 682 301. BY ADV. SRI.K.T.THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGHT COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. AMBIKA RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI, W/O. RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI, ILLATHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHENGAMANADU, ERNAKULAM - 683 103. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.NOUSHAD THOTTATHIL R2 BY ADV. SRI. T.K.VIPINDAS THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: BKA Crl.MC.No. 4399 of 2011() APPENDIX PETITIONER'(S) ANNEXURES: ANNEX.1 COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, CMP NO.2653/2011 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE JUDICIAL 1ST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, ERNAKULAM. ANNEX.2 COPY OF THE FIR NO.1783/2011 REGISTERED BY PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION. ANNEX.3 COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN COMPANY AND THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'(S) ANNEXURES: NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE BKA N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------ Crl. M.C. No: 4399 OF 2011 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 21st day of December, 2011 O R D E R Petitioners are accused numbers 1 to 3, 5 and 6 in Crime No:1783/2011 of Palarivattom Police Station, registered under sections 403, 409, 420, 465, 463, 468, 471 and 120B of IPC and also under sections 65 and 66 of Information Technology Act. 2. The defacto complainant, who is the second respondent herein, is represented in this Court by her counsel. It is submitted by both sides that both parties have settled the matter and a deed of settlement was actually entered into, a copy of which has been produced before this Court. 3. It is submitted that the dispute was with regard to the money which had to paid to the complainant in respect of which settlement has already been arrived at. The Crl. M.C. No: 4399 OF 2011 -2- dispute arose in share business conducted. Petitioners are share brokers. The second respondent is a client. 4. In the light of the settlement arrived at, proceedings in Crime No:1783/2011 of Palarivattom Police Station, will stand quashed. N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE jjj