IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD NOVEMBER 2011 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 1146 of 2011(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.5705/2010 Dated 17/08/2010 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER --------------------------------- BINEESH V., S/O.JAYACHANDRAN, AGED 32 YEARS, RINIL NIVAS, NETTUR P.O., THALASSERY, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.JAMES ABRAHAM (VILAYAKATTU) RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT ------------------------------------- P.C.BINOY, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.A.FAYAZ THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VK Con.Case(C).No. 1146 of 2011(S) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX ------------- PETITIONER'S ANNEXURE ------------------------------ ANNEXURE A1. COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.8.2011 IN WPC NO.5705/2010 ANNEXURE A2. COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL ------------------------------ / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE VK T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Contempt of Court Case No.1146/2011-S ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 23 rd day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Alleging non compliance of the directions issued in Annexure-A1 order, this Contempt of Court Case is filed by the petitioner. The direction was to the Public Service Commission to advice one candidate in terms of the rules within a period of one month. In the affidavit filed by the Secretary to the Commission in para.5 it is explained that the turn in which the above vacancy was to be advised was MRI 12 SC as per rules of reservation and rotation in vogue. One Shri Arunkumar P. was advised on 03/10/2011 and, accordingly, the order issued by this Court has been complied with. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is one more vacancy to which the petitioner is eligible to be advised. The petitioner will have to seek appropriate orders in the writ petition. The Contempt of Court Case is closed since the order has been complied with. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms