:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 342 OF 2002 Ramkrishna Paramhansa Nagar Seva Mandal. .. Petitioner. Vs. The City Engineer, Pune Municipal Corpn. and ors. .. Respondents. Mr. Nitin P. Deshpande for Petitioner. Mr. R.S. Khadilkar holding for R.G. Ketkar for Respondent No.1. ................. CORAM :B.H. MARLAPALLE,J. DATED : 11TH APRIL,2005. P.C.: 1. In this contempt petition in all three respondents have been added and none of them has been named. The first respondent is the City Engineer and the second respondent is the Commissioner of the Pune Municipal Corporation which has been impleaded as respondent No.2. Unless the alleged contemnors’ names are furnished no process can be issued in a contempt petition and therefore, this contempt petition deserves to be rejected at the threshold on this ground alone. :2: 2. Hence, petition is rejected. (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J)