1 18 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CRL.REV.P. 5r3/zooB SANTOSH KUMAR CHAND & ANR. DELHI AT NEW DELHI 6 ..... Petitioners Through Mr.M.T. Malik, advocate. versus EICHER MOTORS LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr.vishrov Mukherjee, advocate. CORAM: HON'BL" *1. JUSTICE SANJTV KHANNA ORDER z6.o4.zolo Respondent no.t has filed the complaint under Section r3B of the Negotiable Instruments Act, rBBr against M/s.Chandra Transport and Forwarding Agency, (Agency, for short), Mr.santosh IG.Chand and Mr.Bhupender Singh. It is stated in the complaint that the Agency is a proprietorship concern of one Mr. B.B.Chand and he had given a cheque of Rs.z,tr,T22l- to the complainant which on presentation had bounced. The complainant thereafter issued legal notice but payment was not made. The petitioners herein, Mr.Santosh Kr. Chand and Mr.Bhupender Singh, as per the complaint are not proprietors or partners of the said wace, az Agency and they t6g' guarantors under an Agreement between the complainant and the said Agency. They have not issued the said cheque. After some hearing, learned counsel for the complainant states that the proceedings against the petitioners under Section $B of the % 9 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified .=7 lo Negotiable Instruments Act, rBBr may be quashed as the petitioners had not issued any cheque and as per the complaint itself, they are not 4' partners/propdetorfl bf the saidAgency. It is however, pointed out that the proceedirigs against the said Agency can continue. Petition is accordingly allowed to the extent indicated above. It is clarified that it will be open to the complainant to press their complaint against the said Agency as per law. DASTI to learned counsel for the parties. a -/L tl - 1 -'IL (-' SANJTV KIIANNA, J. APRIL 26, zoLo. PV \ ,a