(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1086/2005 RANJEET SINGH Vs. SMT. OM KANWAR & SULTAN SINGH DATE: 01.02.2007. HON'BLE MR. K.S. RATHORE, J. Ms. Renu Kumari for Mr. Arvind Kr. Pareek for the petitioner. **** This revision petition under Section 397 Cr.P.C. is preferred by the petitioner against the judgment dated 26.07.2005 passed by the Family Court No.1, Jaipur in Criminal Case No. 25/2002, whereby the application of the respondents moved under Section 125 Cr.P.C. has been allowed and maintenance of Rs. 1,500/- and Rs. 500/- per month to the wife and son of the petitioner respectively has been granted considering the income aspect of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent NO.2, Sultan Singh son of the petitioner Ranjeet Singh is major and he is earning, therefore, maintenance of Rs. 500/- per month to respondent NO.2 has wrongly been awarded by the Family Court. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and after going (2) through the impugned judgment, so far as maintenance of Rs. 1,500/- per month granted to the respondent wife is concerned, I do not want to interfere in the impugned judgment dated 26.07.2005 but as regards maintenance of Rs. 500/- per month to the respondent No.2 sultan Singh son of the petitioner, who is admittedly major, it is for the petitioner to move application before the Family Court stating therein that the respondent No.2 Sultan Singh attains majority and is earning and the Family Court shall consider this aspect and if respondent No.2 Sultan Singh is major and earning member, then maintenance awarded to him may be considered afresh. With these observations, the revision petition stands disposed of. (K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/