^ HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER RESPONDENT8 WRIT PElTriON rCl_No,lS19of.2W7 M/s. Gagan Fuels Throu^i the Soto Proprietor Madanlal Tandm, S/o Late Shri B.R.Tandon, aged about 45 years, Proprietor of Gagan Fueis, R/o Gum Ghasidas Mandir, Tarbahar, Distt. Bilaspur (CUhattisgarii) VERSUS : 1. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, through its Chaimian, Kanoria House, Paha Road, Civil Lines, Nagpur. 2. Senior ?vianager, Bharat Petroteum Corparation Limited, Quality and Quantity Control, West Regioa, Borekhedi, Nagiur (Maharashtra) 3. Mobile Lab Qfficer, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Linuted, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (CMiattisgarh) 4. Territory MMiager, Retail, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (0-ihattisgarh) WRir PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON8TITUTION OF INDIA 8B: Hon'Me ShriSattsh K. AgnUwtri.J. Present: Miss Shannila Singhai, Advocate tar the petitioner. Mr. Saajay K. Agrawal, Advocate for the respondents. >th ORUER 1. cV 'en' 2. 3. (Passed on IS- day of Ssptember, 2007) By way of this petition, the pstitioner has sou^it for quashii^ of Ifae mobile lab report dated 09.02.2007 ('Annexure P/l). Leamed counsel submits that after investisation, a show cause notice was issued to flie petitioner and ttie petitioner filed its response to fhe show cause aotioe. Thereafter, Ifae respondent authorities have temunated the dealerahip aareement on 30.08.2007 ("Annexure P/22) In view of the subsequent devel<»meirts, this petition has become mfinctuous. However. liberty is reserved to the petitioner to challenge the subsequent developments, ifso advised. Coiisequently, this petition is dismissed as having beeome mfluctuoHS with the aforestated tiberty. No order as to costs. -'-^--VK.^. Sd/- SatisffKAgnij,otn Judge ] Anrit