IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 14104 of 2009 Between: ANSHUL KUMAR S/o.Dr.Shiv Prasad Sinha R/o.Flat No.401,Majestic Mansion Begumpet, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department , Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City at Basheerbagh, Hyderabad 3 Mr.Bala Raju, Sub Inspector of Police, Chikkadpally Police station ,.Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ order or direction more in the nature of Habes corpus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondent No.3 in not informing any reason for taking away the detenue Mr.ABHISHK KUMAR SINGH S/o.Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh, aged about 21 years B.Tech Student and kept in their illegal custody which is illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to the Article 21 of the Constitution of India., Therefore the respondent and produce Mr.ABHISHK KUMAR SINGH S/o.Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh, aged about 21 years, B.Tech Student, Hyderabad and set him at liberty forthwith and Award compensation damaged for invasion in the personal liberty and for violation of the orders of the Hon`ble Supreme Court. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.RAMA MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.14104 of 2009 ORAL ORDER : (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R.Varma) When the matter came up for consideration, it is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, the alleged detenu was produced before the Magistrate concerned and remanded to judicial custody, therefore, nothing remains for adjudication in this writ petition. 2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, at the stage of admission. However, there shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ D.S.R.VARMA, J ____________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J 15-07-2009 Msr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.14104 of 2009 15-07-2009 (Msr)