IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA SECOND APPEAL NO. 95 OF 2004 SHRI DEVENDRA R.DESHPRABHU AND ....Appellants ANR., Versus SMT. APARNA R. DESHPRABHU AND 2 ....Respondents ORS., Shri J. P. Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the appellants. Shri F. M. Reis, Advocate for respondent No.2. Coram:- R. M. LODHA, J. Date:- 17th August, 2005 P.C. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellants. The findings of the Courts below are based on due and proper appreciation of the evidence on record led by the plaintiffs. Despite adequate opportunity having been granted to the defendants, they did not lead any evidence. No fault can be found with the findings recorded by the Courts below. No substantial question of law arises in this appeal. The second appeal is dismissed in limine. R. M. LODHA, J.