IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.10425 of 1989 (O&M) Date of decision:07.03.2011 Om Parkash and another ....Petitioners versus The Sirsa Central Cooperative Bank Limited, Sirsa and another. ....Respondents II. Civil Writ Petition No.10426 of 1989 (O&M) The Sirsa Central Cooperative Bank of Mini Bank Managers Union, Sirsa ....Petitioner versus The Sirsa Central Cooperative Bank Limited, Sirsa and another. ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr. Yogesh Sharma, Advocate, for Mr. Bhoop Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for the respondents. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No. 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? No. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? No. ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) 1. The counsel for the petitioner states that the case has become infructuous on account of the fact that the petitioner has already Civil Writ Petition No.10425 of 1989 (O&M) - 2 - been promoted and the relief sought for has been secured by the petitioner. There petition in CWP No.10425 of 1989 is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. 2. The counsel states that he has no instructions in the matter in CWP No.10426 of 1989. The relief claimed in the writ petition is the same as in CWP No.10425 of 1989 and even the basis of claim is the same. They have been consequently be tacked together. What would apply to treating the matter as infructuous in the former case ought to therefore apply, a fortiorari to this case as well. The said appeal is also, therefore, dismissed as infructuous, although the counsel states that he has no instruction from the party. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 07.03.2011 sanjeev