•r'2K, / ,/^y -/ ' -/' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petitfon No. 442 of2005 Gokul Ram S/o Baldu Ram, aged 37 years, Wateniiaii in Govt. Aadiwasi, Hostel, Arkar, Tah. Gurur, Distt. Durg [C.G.] R/o. village MoU&l, P.S. Phulgaon, P.0. MaiimNagar Distt. Durg[C.G.] Versus » , 1. State of Chhattisearfa, throu.ah - •»•, Secretary, Sehedule Tribes, Scheduled Castes and other backward class welfare, Deoartment. Raipur[C.G.j 2. Collector. Durs. District Durs TC.GI ResDondents Writ petition imd»rArticle 226 ofthe Constitation oflndia Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agmhotri. Smt. Meeaa Shashtri, Advocate for the petitioner. Snit. Aajii Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocate forthe State/respondents. ORAL ORDER (Fassed on 9"''J>ay ofMay, 2007) 1. The case ofthe petitioner is that he was appointed as Waterman cum Watchman ('Class IV Emplovee) in Pre Matric Aadiwasi Bovs Hostel, Arkar, Distt. Durg, on 12.08.1992, under 'Anusuchit Jati/Janjati Vishesh Bhartiya Abhiyan' by the concemed Collector as per merit list prepared bv the selection cormnittee. The grievance ofthe petitioner in this writ petition is that Ifae respondents have not resiifarized his service till date. The petitioner has filed a represeatation to the Collector Durg in this regard and that has not been decided. The petitioner made several requests for regularization of his services in ofa} and written fonn, but •l—.-) the authority is not ready to take any positive action. He had filed a representation to the Collector, Durg, on 15.09.2004 2. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. the relief souAt for bv the petitioner is as under: "This Honl)le Coiirt kindly be pleased to difect the respondents to pay fhe petitioner regular pay-scale with arrears ofpay since » 1992 or after 1992 maldng i^egularization." ~^~ 3. In my opinion the responsible respondents ought to have considered the .erievaace ofthe petitioner made in his represeotation. Since that has not been done, a direction requires to be issued to the respondents. Accordingly, tfae following: fe (i) The writ petitipn is disposed of'. (ii) A direction is issued to the competent autbority before whom the representation said to have been filed by the petitioner is pendiag, to consider the same and pass aa appropriate order iii accordance with law, within six months from fhe date ofreceipt ofa copy of this order. Ordered accordmelv. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge A^ni': ^:'-^. -<<tl^^;,.,.j