^ <?? HIS^ CCURT OF WHATTIS6ARH AT BD.ASPUR W. P. (S)No. 2535tff 37 Bodhrom Pradhan, Sonof Shri Jcgannath Pradhtn, aged about 57 years, Presentiy posted as Assistant Teacher', B?ys Prim<ry School Sar'ia, Block Baramkela, District Raigorh Versus 1. State of Chhattisgorh, throigh the Secretary, &ep<n'tment of Schoo! Education, AAantralayc b.K.S. Bhawon.Raipur 'Oie District Education Officer, Raiqarh, District Roigarh (C.6.) 3. The Block Educati'on Officer, Baramkelo, bistrict Raigai+i (C.6.5 Writ Petition under Artictes 226 of the Constitution of India Single Bench; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. PreSent; Ms.Sharmila Singhai, Advocote for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Oubey, Pcne! Lawyer for the State/respondents. OR66R (Possed on 25"'&oy of April, 2< 1. Learned counsel appegring for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 31.7.2CX>4,the petitioner was trardferred from 8oys Primwy Schoo!, Saria, !lock Ba'amketa, &istrict Raigarh to Boys Primary School, Kodwortpara. Thereafter, the said trchsfer or-der was cancelled vide order dated 17.2.2006. After canceliation of the said transfer order, the petitioner has made a pepr'esentation for releue of 'his salary as the ssme became admissible andpayAle. Nd step hce been taken so far'. r-:t EBIlii i;,^U Subhssh 4. In view of that, learned counse) uppearing for the petitioner confines his prayer to give direction to the respondents to eonsider and pass appropriate order on the representation made by the petitioner, in accordance with !aw, iwithm a stipulated period of time. Learned counse! appearing for the respondents has no objection. Itis orderaccording!y. The petition stonds disposed of with a direction to respondents/autiiorities to consider- and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 16.05.2006 (Annexure P/2). in accordsmce with Scnw, on its own merit, within o period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge -ifc