1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. APPEAL NO.60 OF 2006 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1661 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO. 2534 OF 2003 Ramesh Moreshwar Patil and others. .. Appeallnts v/s. Kamlakar Khanderao Patil and others .. Respondents Mr.M.S.D'Mello for the appellants. Dr.Virendra Tulzapurkar, Senior Counsel with Ms.Hemalata Jain and Ms.Samidha Vdpathak i/by M/s.Maneksha & Sethna for the respondent Nos.6 to 8. CORAM : R.M. LODHA & ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 7TH FEBRUARY, 2006. P.C. Heard Mr.M.S.D'Mello, the learned counsel for the appellants. 2. For the reasons stated in the impugned order, we find no error in declining the ad-interim order to the plaintiffs-appellants. 3. The appeal does not deserve to be admitted. Dismissed in limine. 4. The plaintiffs may apply to the learned Motion Judge for expediting the hearing of the motion. (R.M.LODHA, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)