IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.69 of 2008 NIRMALA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02 09.01.2009 Heard. Petitioner takes exception to the judgment and order of acquittal by the learned trial court. The opposite parties herein were tried under Sections 147,323 and 379 of the Penal Code and the trial court on appraisal of the evidence gave benefit of doubt and acquitted the opposite parties herein. Learned counsel for the petitioner before this court fairly submits that there is a bonafide land dispute between the parties. This court on perusal of the impugned judgment under challenge also finds that both the parties are litigating with respect to share/title of certain pieces of land. The learned trial court has recorded reasons/ findings in paragraph nos. 8,13,15 of the impugned judgment. This court does not find any patent illegality warranting interference in the judgment by allowing the present application seeking leave to appeal. The application is, accordingly, rejected. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)