IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39532 of 2009 1. TANAY SHARMA 2. BIDYANAND SHARMA 3. AMIR SHARMA 4. PARMILA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 14/01/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State of Bihar. The petitioners are the family members of the husband apprehending arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section- 498A of Indian Penal Code only. The defence is that the complaint itself manifests that the complainant was aggrieved by the fact that her husband had re-married. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case let the petitioners above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Complaint Case No.260/08. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)