IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G] M.c.c No. “a? /2oo9 IN WRIT PETITION227 No. 6794 OF 2009 PETITIONERS: 1. Lakhan Lal, S/o Late Shri Ram Dayal, aged about 65 years, 2. Soan Das, S/o Lakhan Lal, aged about 4O years, 3. Soansay, S/ 0 Lakhan Lal, aged 37 years, All by caste Satnami, residents of village Dhaniya , Police Station 85 Up Tahsil Seepat, Tahsil Takhatpur (correct Tahsil is Masturi), District Bilaspur (co) VERSUS 1. Darbar, S/o Late Shri Ramdayal, aged about 62 years, C§\QA> WW~ o7 7’ QMM i Smt Kheman Bai, W/o Shri Darbar aged about 58 years, @3. Gend Ram, S/ o Late Shri Ramdayal, aged about 59 years, @4’. Smt Jhul Bai W/o Shri Gend Ram, aged about 55 years, 5. Govind, S/o Gend Ram, aged about 38 years, 5’. Smt Meena Bai, W/o Shri govind, aged about 34 years, . Kirtan, S/o Shri Gendram, aged about 35 years, Q“ r 8am 3.8. Hon’b!e $hri Justice MK. £3 10.12.2009 Shri CK Kesharwani, Advoc Heard on appnsation far 6794/09. Learned counse! appearing the counsei for the petitioners o bonafide mistake, therefore, W.F dismissed on 20.1 1 .2009, may be On due considerafion, I ax‘ peti‘zioners 5e succeeded in expia‘ ihe/refore, the appncation is auowe‘ reetored to n3 originai file. A copy of this order bed petition and {he same be iieiec Winfer vacation. marwm ate for petiticnem. $hri Sameev Kumar Agraww, Panel Lawyer for State. reetorafion of WP (227) No. for the petitioners eunmife ihaf ouid noi appear on account of (227) No. 6794/09; which was reetored to ifs originai fife. n satisfied that the counsel for ning ihe cause of hie abeence, d and WP (227) No. 6794f0§a is; aeed on record of fhe original for hearing immediaieiy after Sdl— N.K.Agarwal Judge n2 are