CRM-M 2649 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M 2649 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.03.2011 Akbar and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate, for the complainant. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Affidavit of Yoginder Singh Nehra, Superintendent of Police, Mewat at Nuh, handed over in Court is taken on record. This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.632 dated 25.12.2010 under Sections 148/149/323/506 IPC and 325 IPC (added lateron), Police Station Nuh, District Mewat. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, on the instructions of SI Hawa Singh, who is personally present in the Court, states that custodial interrogation of petitioners No.1 and 4 is required only to recover the lathi by which they have caused injuries, which were declared to be dangerous to life, on the body of the injured. He further states that custodial interrogation of other accused i.e. petitioners No.2, 3, 5 and 6 is not required. CRM-M 2649 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Learned counsel for the petitioners states that petitioners have not mis-used the interim bail granted to them vide order dated 28.1.2011 Mr. Gaurav Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryan, states that injuries which are declared to be dangerous to life are cumulative skull factor and injury on the leg. However, he fairly states that the lathi used shall not be bearing any blood stains. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, petition is allowed. Order dated 28.1.2011 is made absolute, subject to the conditions mentioned under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. However, it is clarified that petitioners shall keep on co-operating in the investigation and if they fail to do so, Investigating Officer shall be at liberty to get the bail cancelled. (Alok Singh) Judge March 14, 2011 R.S.