IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M-32060 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision : 13.02.2009 Anil Kumar ....Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ....Respondent. BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. B.S. Chahar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG Haryana. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the State has informed that petitioner has failed to join the investigation. Counsel further submits that pursuant to order dated 05.12.2008, passed by this Court, petitioner has joined the investigation once. However, offences under Sections 467,471 IPC were added later on. According to the counsel petitioner is required for investigation in offences under the said Sections as well. Counsel for the petitioner, on the other hand, submits that he has no instructions from the petitioner despite his repeated efforts to contact the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition for grant of anticipatory bail is dismissed. 13.02.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE