IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19530 of 2011 Md. Lukman Ali, S/O-Md. Yunus Mian Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 04 27.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 14.02.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 707 of 2011 but again this second bail petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner on the ground that up-till-now prosecution could not succeed to bring on record the F.S.L. report. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that in course of investigation the officials of D.R.I. sent the seized sample for chemical examination but the aforesaid sample was not examined rather one of the laboratory reported that the laboratory does not possess necessary equipments for examination. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, particularly, keeping in mind that heroin worth Rs. 4, 05, 00000/- had been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner, I do not think it proper to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Special Case No. 20 of 2010 pending in the court of Sessions Judge- cum Special Judge, Araria is, hereby, rejected. However, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner as early as possible. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)