IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51005 of 2008 CHHOTE YADAV, son of late Bishun Yadav, resident of village Bhaura Bartar, P.S. Manpur, District Nalanda Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.823 of 2009 CHHOTE YADAV, son of Rajendra Yadav, r/o village Bhairo Bartar, P.S. Manpur, District – Nalanda Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.47993 of 2008 CHHOTE YADAV, son of late Jhaman Yadav, resident of village -Bhaura Bartar, P.S. Manpur, District – Nalanda Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 23.1.2009 Heard. The name of an accused of the same name sake like the three petitioners in the three petitions i.e. Chhote Yadav find place in the FIR but he has been described as son of late Makai Yadav. There is a confession recorded by the police of accused Ravindra in paragraph 12 and in that confession names of Chhote Yadav, son of Bisun Yadav and Chhote Yadav, son of Jhaman Yadav do not find place, it is petitioner Chhote Yadav, son of Rajendra Yadav of Cr. Misc. No. 823 of 2009 who has been named by him. But again, the contention is that the FIR contains the names of Chhote 2 Yadav, son of Makai Yadav. Informant in his further statement in paragraph 9 of the case diary has named one Chhote Yadav without any parentage and it could be assumed that he has taken the same name which has been mentioned in the FIR. Besides above material in the case diary, there is nothing against them. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10000 (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. IV, Nalanda at Biharsharif in Manpur P.S. Case no. 29 of 2008 (S.T. No. 584 of 2008). Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )