1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.15 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4431 OF 2009 Arun Kishan Ingle ...Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.R.C.Kotiankar for Petitioner. Mr.T.J.Pandian for Respondents 1 to 3. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATED:- MARCH 30, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. We are conscious of the fact that the grievance of the Petitioner essentially is one of error committed by this Court in respect of question of fact as well as question of law. However, considering the averments made in Paragraph No.13, in the interest of justice, we are inclined to recall the order dated 21st July 2009 for the simple reason that the specific case made out by the Petitioner that the question of delay or laches to extend benefits to similarly placed employees on the basis of the decision of the Court, 2 would not arise. This aspect has not been specifically dealt with in the order under review. As aforesaid, in the interest of justice, we are inclined to recall the order dated 21st July 2009 whereby the Writ Petition was dismissed summarily. 3. Accordingly, in terms of this order, the Writ Petition shall stand restored to the file to be listed for admission. 4. It will be open to the Respondents to file reply to the Writ Petition in the Registry before the next date of hearing. List on 22nd April 2010. (R.M.SAVANT, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)