:1 4 u -^ IM TI-IE HON'BLE M.P. STATS ADMINISTBATIV3 TRIRTMAL, 3ENCH AT IUIPUR (0.3.) ^. -'s / '- » i .^ O.A.NO.———.--/2002. Mahesh Kusiar Nagariya Age^5^years 3/o7Sri .Basant.Lal Nagariya 'Sevaka' in the Office of the Goinmandant Mana Gamn< RAIPUR (C.G-.) • AP.PLTG:WT f VERSUS (1) TheState of Cfen.ar.t^sgarh Through the G^e^'g'ecretFiry Department of Reffabilitation Ministry Secretariate D.K.S. Building RAIPUR (G«a. ) (2) The Special Duty Officer Dep&rtment of CTeneral Administration and Public Grievances Removal Gell Secretariate D.K.S. Building RAIPUR (C.G. ) (3) The C.ocimanaant Office of the Conimandant Departruent of Rehabilitation. Mana Camp BAIPUR: ( G. G. ) RESPONDSNTS APPLIGATION UNDER SBCTION i9 OF THE .A.DMINISTHATTVE TRIBULTALS ACT, 1985. L---. ;' 'STT^T'^T ff^ ^TI^T 5^^i<=b ^rft^T Tuniane ^-oE[-^Tp^Z[, ^>Tl1<4^1(o, [®ICr1I<Hy SIT^T ^^K HIW1T ^h^icb o-s^~ '^ 200 "I^^ST" ^TI^T'^TT^R ^Tf^T SB : Hors'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava,J. 11-03-2010 ShriVarunendra Mishra, counsel fit Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer for t^ Heard. Grievance of the petitioner as se|t entitled to revised pay scale of Rs.3500-5^ Learned counsel for the petition|8r employee Manik Lal Das was grantecj 04-05-1999 (Annexure A-5) passed in petition, petitioner has brought on recorc| the Government by which other simi!arly| pay scaie of Rs.3500-5200/-. Petitioner Manik La! Das and other employees, dated 02-05-2008 (Annexure A-12) fited a| vvhb In the return fi!ed by the respond^r Lal Das, Sevak was granted the beneffil order in case ofthe petitioner, no such be|iefst Taking into consideration that benefit of revised pay scate, tiie respon^ and teke appropriate dedsion in the situated to other employees, who have' 02-05-2008 (Annexure A-12), as ex| emphasize, if the petitioner is stiE! aggri| recourse to remedy available to him unde| With the aforesaid observation, th^ ^i^fcn^i 'HTOTf'? fe^ <p3i^i< ^'3:rf^R 3TT^T >r the petitioner. e Statefrespondents. >e|t out in the petition is that petitioner is 1001- instead of Rs.3050-4590/-. submits that one similarly sifciated this benefit in view of order dated ~ |is favour. During the pendency of this the order dated 02-05-2008 passed by [situated employees have been granted stjbmits that he is similarly situated to Mr. have been granted benefit vide order |ong with the rejoinder. )nd^nts, it has been stated that one Manik |of revised pay scaie but as there is no could be granted. nut|nber of persons have been granted the lent authoritles are directed to consider c^se of the petitioner, if he is similarly been granted benefit vide order dated )editious!y as possible. Needless to ^ved, it would be open for him to take the law. petition is finaily disposed of 1-"-—-'~'-----—"—'~~ Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge I 'nA '^(T^