IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22990 of 2011 Md. Fazal Emam, Son of Md. Kamaruddin, resident of village N.P.C.C. Colony, P.S. Valmiki Nagar in the District of West Champaran. ---------- Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar. 2.Shaida Parween @ Tabassum Aara, Wife of Md. Fazal Emam, Daughter of Md. Jilani, resident of N.P.C.C. Colony, Valmiki Nagar, P.S. Valmiki Nagar, At present Mohalla Ujjain Tola, Ward No. 04, Bettiah, P.S. Bettiah Town in the District of West Champaran. -------- Opposite Parties ----------- 02/- 01/08/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is one of the named accused in this complaint case being husband of the complainant with general allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. Submission is that, petitioner’s marriage with the complainant was solemnized on keeping him in dark about her earlier marriage and matrimonial relationship. He has already filed Matrimonial (Divorce) Case No. 194 of 2009 before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bettiah, West Champaran, seeking dissolution of marriage and divorce etc. Further, submission is that by way of interim maintenance a sum of Rs. 500/- per month has been ordered to be paid against which the petitioner has already preferred criminal revision, but to avoid any further complication, he is ready to paid the said amount (as stated above) to the complainant, subject to any order on the point by the competent court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on the event of filing an application before the court below, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let 2 the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail- bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Tr. No. (Special Case) 523 of 2011 (arising out of Complaint Case No. 2974C/2008), subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years of till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation or even on single default in payment, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)