IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29848 of 2010 TAPENDRA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 05.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. As per allegation, petitioner along with his son-in-law namely Om Prakash Singh came to informant and requested him for allowing his deceased daughter to go to him to serve co-accused Om Prakash Singh’s wife. Deceased accompanied them, but she did not return rather her dead body was recovered. Submission on behalf of petitioner is that petitioner was accompanying co-accused Om Prakash Singh while he took the deceased with him is not supported by any witness in the case diary; may be there, but F.I.R. is clear about his accompanying co-accused Om Prakash Singh and coming of deceased to this petitioner’s house, thereafter, her disappearance and recovery of her dead body only and false explanation by this petitioner about disappearance of the deceased from his house that he had gone to Mizoram disentitle him for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer of petitioner for anticipatory bail stands rejected. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)