IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 25TH JUNE, 2007/4TH ASHADHA, 1929 W.A. 3534 OF 2001 D (AGAINST JUDGMENT DT. 6.7.2001 IN O.P.10091/98) APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS IN O.P. 1. BENNY GEORGE, JR. HEALTH INSPECTOR GR.II P.H.C., KEEZHAPALLY 2. SAJEEV.A., JR. HEALTH INSPECTOR, GR.II, P.H.C. KOTTIYOOR 3. SAJU, JR. HEALTH INSPECTOR GR.II, P.H.C.KEEZHALLUR 4. MURALLEDHARAN PILLAI.N. JR. HEALTH INSPECTOR GR.II, PH.C. MUZHAKUNNU 5. JOHNY P.JOSE JR. HEALTH INSPECTOR GR.II, PH.C.ODUVALLITHATTU 6. SADIK K.K.P., JR. HEALTH INSPECTOR GR.II P.H.C.PARASSINIKADAVU 7. JOSEPH.T.M, JR. HEALTH INSPECTOR GR.II P.H.C.VALLITHODE 8. SASEENDRAN THOONERY, JR. HEALTH INSPECTOR GR.II P.H.C.IRIVERY 9. JNANAPRAKASANK.A., JR.HEATLH INSEPCTOR GR.II PH.C,ALAKKODU 10. JOHN V.S., JR.HEALTH INSPECTOR GR.II P.H.C., PULINGOME 11. SREEVALSAN.N. JR. HEALTH INSPECTOR GR.II P.H.C., PULINGOME 12. K.V.HARIDASAN, JR. HEALTH INSPECTOR GR.II., P.H.C.ETTIKKULAM 13. PRAKASH KUMAR.K., JR. HEALTH INSPECTOR GR.II., P.H.C, IRITTY 14. UNNIKRISHNAN.P., JR. HEALTH INSPECTOR GR.II, P.H.CTHILLENKERY 15. JAGADEESAN T.M., JR. HEALTH INSPECTOR GR.II, P.H.C.PERINGOME 16. VIJAYAN PANAYAMTHITTA EDAYILA VEETTIL JR. HEALTH INSPECTOR GR.II, P.H.C PULINGOME 17. SASINDRAN.M. JR.HEALTH INSPECTOR GR.II P.H.C. KOOTTUMUGHAM 18. ABRAHAM VARIKKANICKAL JR. HEALTH INSPECTOR GR.II., P.H.C. PULINGOME BY ADV SHRI. S. RAMESH BABU RESPONDENTS: 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY (HEALTH) SECRETARIATE, TRIVANDRUM 2. DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, TRIVANDRUM 3. N. JAGAJEEVAN JR. HEALTH INSPECTOR PHC VAMANAPURAM, VAMANAPURAM P.O., TRIVANDRUM R1 & 2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SHRI. SANESH RAJ THIS W.A. HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25.6.2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & ANTONY D0MINIC, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.A. No. 3534 OF 2001 D = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 25th June, 2007 J U D G M E N T Radhakrishnan, J. Counsel for the appellants submitted that the writ appeal has become infructuous. Hence, the writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/