WP(C) 6163/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. KOTISWAR SINGH Heard Mr. R. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. P.N. Goswami, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1,2 and 4 to 5. At the outset, the learned counsel for the respondent has pointed o ut that the petitioner had earlier approached the authorities by filing the appl ications dated 18-11-2011 and 25-11-2011 before the respondent No.3/Deputy Commi ssioner-cum-Chairman, District Level Committee, Dhubri (which are found at annex ure- 7 and annexure-8 respectively to the writ petition) for appointment on comp assionate ground and therefore, it would be pre-matured to approach this Court i n raising the grievance of the petitioner. I find force in the arguments of th e learned counsel for the respondents. Therefore, this writ petition stands closed with a direction to the petitioner to wait for the decision of the concerned authority first and approac h this Court if he is aggrieved by any action taken by the authority concerned/r espondent No.3 in this regard or their unreasonable inaction.