IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4031 OF 2009 Moreshwar @ Murlidhar Narhar Saundattikar. ..... ...Petitioner V/s Hirachand Baburao Bargale & Ors. ..... ..... .Respondents. Mr.Vijay Killedar, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr.S.M.Railkar, Adv. for the Respondent No.2. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 3rd December, 2009. PC: After framing of additional issue touching the plea of tenancy under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act the issue has been referred to the authority. It is this order dated 27.11.08 which is challenged by filing the present petition. After framing of the issue same has been referred to the Tahsildar and Tahsildar has been directed to decide the same within a period of three months. Belatedly present petition has been filed. Be that as it may, the impugned order reveals that name of respondent Nos. 1 to 6 do find place since 1972 onwards till 1994 in 7/12 extract. The Court below has observed that there is reference to tenancy also in column No.3. The said issue has been framed in the light of defence raised by respondent in written statement. It is crystal clear that the issue of tenancy arises for consideration and the same has rightly been framed by court below and referred to the authority. Perused the impugned order. Same does not call for any interference. Writ petition stands dismissed. 30.12.2009.