HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8812 of 2011 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking to issue a writ of Mandamus directing respondents 4 and 5 not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioners on one hand and respondents 6 to 8 on the other in respect of the lands in Survey No.163 situated at Hydernagar, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. It is the grievance of the petitioners that though they are the owners and possessors of the land admeasuring Ac.21.00 cs in the said Survey number, there is interference by respondents 6 to 8 and as such, they approached respondents 4 and 5 to provide police protection, but, the police denied to grant police protection and are insisting them to settle the civil disputes with respondents 6 to 8 amicably. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Based on the written instructions, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the official respondents that the petitioners as well as respondent No.8-society are claiming rights over the property in question. She further submitted that as the dispute is of civil nature, the respondents-Police have not initiated any action on the complaint given by the petitioners. It is further categorically submitted that respondents 4 and 5 have never insisted petitioners to settle the disputes with the unofficial respondents 6 to 8. Although, it is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that in the suits filed by respondents 6 to 8, the claim of the said respondents was rejected as the petitioners herein are in possession of the land in question, but, at the same time, it is to be seen that there is no injunction obtained by the petitioners in their favour over the land in question. If there is any interference by any third parties, it is for the petitioners to approach the common Court of law and seek appropriate reliefs. With regard to the allegation of the petitioners that there is insistence by respondents 4 and 5 to settle the civil disputes with respondents 6 to 8, it is categorically submitted by the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the official respondents that the police personnel have never insisted the petitioners to settle the disputes with respondents 6 to 8. In view of the said statement made by the learned Government Pleader for Home and in the absence of any material on the allegation of the petitioners that respondents 4 and 5 are insisting to settle the dispute with respondents 6 to 8, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition placing the said statement of the learned Government Pleader for Home on record. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 08th April 2011 DR