BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the First day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15446 of 2011 1 MUTHURAMALINGAM 2 CHANDARAN 3 RAJENDRAN, S/O. BOOPATHY 4 RAJENDRAN, S/O. GURUSAMY 5 RAMU 6 THENNARASU 7 SELVARAJ 8 ANBALAGAN 9 BALASARASWATHI 10 PARIMALA 11 RAMALAKSHMI 12 SETHU 13 BALAMURUGAN 14 KUMAR 15 PALANIVAL ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MUTHUKULATHUR POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT, CRIME NO.168 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. J.SENTHIL KUMARIAH Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are accused in Cr.No.168 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 294(b), 307, 323, 324, and 506(ii) of I.P.C. Apprehending arrest, at the hands of the respondent police, the petitioners are before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.It is brought to the knowledge of this Court that the 7th petitioner in this petition has already been arrested. In view of the same, this petition is dismissed insofar as the 7th petitioner is concerned. 4.According to the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners, due to the public works contract motive, the petitioners https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ have been falsely implicated in this case. The learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that the petitioners are entitled for anticipatory bail since the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 5.The Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 6.Considering the submissions made by both sides, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners 1 to 6 and 8 to 15, with the following conditions: i)Accordingly, the petitioners 1 to 6 and 8 to 15 are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Muthukulathur, on each executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned; ii)the petitioners 1 to 6 and 8 to 15 shall stay at Kamudhi and report before the Kamudhi Police Station every day at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. iii)The petitioners 1 to 6 and 8 to 15 shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously; and on further condition that iv)the petitioners 1 to 6 and 8 to 15 shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 01/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MUTHUKULATHUR. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MUTHUKULATHUR POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 5. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE STATION, KAMUDHI POLICE STATION, KAMUDHI. +1. CC to M/S. J.SENTHIL KUMARIAH Advocate SR.No.42290 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15446 of 2011 Date :01/12/2011 RJ/2.12.11 (IT) 2p/7c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/