IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 09.08.2010 COCP No.1541 of 2010 Krishana Devi ...Petitioner Versus S.P.Lohia ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Shakun Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The petitioner earlier filed a civil suit for permanent injunction restraining defendant Nos.1 & 2 from raising the height of Damp Proof Course (DPC) of plot No.2884, Urban Estate, Jind. The said suit was withdrawn by the petitioner on 22.1.2008, when defendant Nos.1 & 2 made a statement that construction shall be raised as per Rules & Regulations issued by the HUDA. Thereafter, the petitioner filed a writ petition before this Court. This Court on 16.3.2009 has directed the Estate Officer, HUDA, Jind to look into the petitioner’s complaint and proceed in the matter, in accordance with law and regulations. Once the petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of the Civil Court and claimed a decree for permanent injunction, wherein defendant Nos.1 & 2 have made a statement that they shall raise construction as per the Rules & Regulations of the HUDA, it will be a disputed question, whether the construction raised by defendant Nos.1 & 2 is in terms of the aforesaid Rules and Regulations. For such grievance, the petitioner has the effective alternative remedy before the Civil Court. In view of the said fact, no further orders are called for in the present contempt petition. The same is dismissed. 15.07.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE