IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2009 / 2ND POUSHA 1931 RP.No. 1011 of 2009() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WA.1169/2006 Dated 17/07/2006 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): 1ST APPELLANT IN WRIT APPEAL: --------------------------------------------------- GEORGE VARGHESE, EARLIER WORKING AS ASSISTANT MOTOR VEHICLES INSPECTOR JOINT R.T.O. OFFICE, PATHANAMTHITTA, NOW WORKING AS MOTOR VEHICLES INSPECTOR R.T.OFFICE, ATTINGAL. BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS AND 2ND APPELLANT IN WA: --------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER MOTOR VEHICLES DEPARTMENT, HEAD OFFICE, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, MALLAPPALLY, PATHANAMTHITTA. 4. P.K.BABU, EARLIER WORKING AS ASSISTANT MOTOR VEHICLES INSPECTOR, SUB REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, WADAKKANCHERRY, NOW WORKING AS MOTOR VEHICLES INSPECTOR, R.T.O. OFFICE, KALPATTA, WAYANADU. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BENNY GERVASIS THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2009, ALONG WITH RP NO.1060 OF 2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ----------------------------------------- R.P.Nos.1011 & 1060 of 2009 in W.A.No.1169 of 2006 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2009 O R D E R Kurian Joseph, J. These are review petitions filed by the appellants/review petitioners. The issue pertains to the grant of Higher Grade counting the service rendered by the writ petitioners prior to their entry in the Motor Vehicles Department. Learned Counsel for the review petitioners submits that they may be permitted to withdraw the writ appeal and writ petition so as to approach the Government by way of an appropriate representation. We do not think that the same is a ground for review. We find that the request for an opportunity to approach the Government is not seen considered in the judgment. Therefore, the review petitions are allowed and the judgment under review is recalled. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) (C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) ahg. KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. --------------------------- R.P.Nos.1011 & 1060 of 2009 in W.A.No.1169 of 2006 ---------------------------- O R D E R 23rd December, 2009