IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-8005 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 21.7.2011. Alpana & others ...... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Rajesh S. Gaur, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Satyavir Yadav, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Renu Tyagi, Advocate, for the complainant. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) This petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed seeking quashing of First Information Report (for short 'FIR) No.394 dated July 16th, 2010 registered under Sections 419, 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') in Police Station Secto4-7, Faridabad. 2. By order dated March 16th, 2011, Ritu Bahri. J. directed the parties to appear before the trial Court and trial Court was directed to record their statements. In compliance with the order of this Court, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridabad recorded the statements of the parties whereby they have stated that they have compromised the matter with the intervention of respectables and common relatives. They have tendered Compromise-deed (Annexure P-2). Indeed, the dispute between the parties was of personal nature. In view of this, there should not be any impediment in allowing the parties to compromise the matter. Support to this view can be had from the authority 'Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab' 2008 (2) RCR (Criminal) 429, wherein, Hon'ble Supreme Court has ruled that in such type of cases, where the dispute is of personal nature, Court should ordinarily, accept the compromise. Criminal Misc. No. M-8005 of 2011 (O&M) (2) 3. In view of the above, the petition is accepted, FIR No.394 dated July 16th, 2010 registered under Sections 419, 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC in Police Station Secto4-7, Faridabad and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 21.7.2011. SN