IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 24TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 2ND ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 22007 of 2009(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. T.C.BABY, S/O.CHAKKAPPAN, THANNIKOTTUVEETIL, PANTHALAMPADAM, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. T.P.THOMAS, S/O.POULOSE, THANNIKOTTUVEETIL, PANTHALAMPADAM, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, VADAKKENCHERY GRAMA PANCHAYAT, VADAKKENCHERY P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. A.I.VASANTHAN, AMBALASSERY HOUSE, P.K.NAGAR, VADAKKENCHERY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. R1 BY ADV.S.RAMESH BABU R2 BYADV. SRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN SRI.BABY MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.22007 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of September, 2009 JUDGMENT The fundamental plea of the petitioners against the impugned order is that they were not given an opportunity of hearing in spite of Ext.P6. On instructions, learned counsel for the first respondent states that unfortunately, it has so happened. Recording this submission and taking the further submission on behalf of the first respondent that it is not willful, the impugned order is set aside and the petitioners and the second respondent are directed to appear before the first respondent on or before 20.10.2009 so that the matter could be disposed of expeditiously. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.29/9.