IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 440 of 2008 Surender Uppal and another …… Petitioners Versus The State of Uttarakhand and another …… Respondents …… Mr. Arvind Vashistha, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C. J. In view of the specific averments made in the petition, I am convinced that no interference by this Court in exercise of this Court’s jurisdiction U/s 482 Cr.P.C. is warranted. The petition is dismissed. This, however, shall not prevent the petitioners from approaching the learned trial Court as well as the respondent no. 2 for an offer to make the payment of the cheque amount in question. If the petitioners do so, it is upto respondent no. 2 to accept the offer or not to accept the offer and depending upon the acceptance or non-acceptance, the learned trial Court shall act in the matter in accordance with law. Mr. Arvind Vashistha, the learned counsel for the petitioners, undertakes before me that the petitioners shall surrender in the trial Court on the next date. Recording this undertaking on behalf of the petitioners, I direct that till the next date the execution of the non- bailable warrants issued by the trial Court against the petitioners shall stay. (V. K. Gupta, C. J.) 14.07.2008 A