IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39624 of 2010 RAKESH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 03.11.10. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner being the husband is languishing in custody since 02.08.2010 in a case registered under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that the petitioner was married to the informant in the year 2005. It is submitted that when the petitioner got the compassionate appointment after death of his father this frivolous case was lodged. Initially the marriage was performed under pressure. Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan learned counsel appearing for the informant submits that the petitioner after five years of the marriage has alleged the performance of the marriage under pressure. The informant is still ready to resume the conjugal life, which also gets reflected from the impugned order. The petitioner is not ready for resumption of conjugal life. The petitioner i.e., the husband is willing to pay Rs. 1,000/-(One Thousand) per 2 month to the informant. The aforesaid amount will be deposited in the account of the informant in the first week of every month from December, 2010. The informant will supply the account number to the petitioner within a period of one week from today. The aforesaid payment by the petitioner will be subject to any order being passed in the matrimonial, maintenance or reconciliation proceedings between the parties. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Jamui in connection with Sikandra P.S. Case No. 164 of 2010. On failure to make payment consecutively for three months will give liberty to the informant to file an application for cancellation of bail. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)