1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.42/2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3069/1991 (Decided) Shri R.D. Dinkar and others ...Versus... Indian Railway Construction Co. Ltd. (IRCON) and another -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri R. Chhabra, Adv. for petitioners] [S/Shri N.P. Lambat, A.P. Nagrath, Advs. for respdts.] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 26.06.2008 Learned Counsel for the petitioners prays for adjournment. However, since the petition can be disposed of finally, request for adjournment is rejected. Learned Counsel for the respondents makes a statement that in response to the order of this Court, dated 14.10.2004 passed in writ petition, in terms of Minutes of order, filed by learned Counsel for the parties, hearing was given to the petitioners on 15.4.2005, but then thereafter the file got misplaced and 2 after tracing out the file, representation was decided on 21.9.2007. Undoubtedly, there is delay in deciding the representation. Learned Counsel for the respondents tenders apology for this delay, which according to him has been caused because of file getting misplaced. He further states that warning has been given to the concerned custodian of the file. In view of the decision taken on the representation and the decision having been communicated to the petitioners, nothing remains in the contempt proceedings. Hence, contempt proceedings are dropped. Contempt Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE ssw