§%!GH CGUR‘? GP SH%;K??SEG§RH. EILA3’FUR WRIT §3ETIT!-3N i$§ $0. 6§$8i2§1i3 @ETI??Q§‘\§E?¥ Heera Ram Sewangan, S/o Late Ram} Dwgangan, aged a§eu% d8 years, Rm N5 Baramkeia, Eisirici’ Raigarh (3G) VERSLS RE$PC§R§BEW$$ 1. Siate of Chhatt‘sgamy through zhe Eacretafy “Qpartmené 0f Agricultufe (Matsyodyog), i".r<.b. Bhavan, Raipur 7K» (6.6.) 2. The Director Departwient of Agricwura (i‘iktsyccvcg; DKS. Bhavan, Raipua (C G; 3. AssEtant Diiecwr, Deparimem of Agrécuiim’e gMatsyodyag). Raigam (cc-3 JXI§€JT 9E“? QN ii§ki§E§ AR CLE 22$ OF $HE €3GN$T§T¢T§Q§§ C}? EMMA §3p5eaf€unCe: Mr. Adhiraj Suiawa Advocae far ’the aeiii'itmer. M? S K W3h¥ Pam. Lawmwo. .ne $t¢t¥3 §KAL URDEK {92. 2.2mm SUML KIJMAR SINHAJ. Heard on admission. xiietitiony— Heera Ram Dewangan is wwkirg 0n the pest of Fisheries inspector. B: the imwgned order daieé ’15.0f.2mG (Amexurw Pi; the petitioner ha$ been transferred from Raxgarh to Bagicha waoéwpw) on administrative ground. Mr. $uraf1a submxts tnai eather the petitioraer had Theo an appncauow for ha$ iransfer§om Ragarh to Bgasour bun Ii aooeaxs ha? toe 3am appimauon was noL commdeled am me oeu:2oner ha$ been traasfefrod to Bagécha. ‘g‘nere i$ no 1ega‘5 xmpmjwnew on the emomyeefiaovemmem to coosider and dispose oi‘ a repre$emaiiori beio'ré passing an order of tiano'ier 0h aciminio‘imtive gmund. Gn being pointediy asked from ihe iaamed oouosei foi" the petihorier :i'iat so ce wheii ‘he petitionei was posted at Raigdm he submits {hat me petitioner was posted at Raigaih smite iasi 1U yeai's. it has not been disputed ihat the peiiiioner is working 0a a "ii'ans‘erabie oost. Transfer is an incidenoe o? service. No person working on a ensiiei'abie posi sen make his ciaim For nostingai a earticmar giace. i": is “? g WRH PETI?§£§§\£L$;} NQL 8§E3§2Q1G far the empm‘yer to see as m who should be posted a": whéch piace‘ keeping in mind the barter funcmning 0f the degar‘tment as aiso the pubiic interest . Uniess the Qrder of transfer i$ shown to be vitiated by maEafaaes or extraneous c0r1s§cierations Oi it is shown to be passed agamst any statutery Rme 0? ihe Act, normauy such Orders are not ta be inieffemci by a Court of Ema is the sewed View of the Apex Com 3n many caseS. Except the above, no other ground was preesed befere this ‘u Cami ! do not find any substance in the petition. The petitiOh is iiebie ito be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summai'iiy.