THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.951 of 2010 ORAL ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 28.01.2010, passed by the Judge, Family Court- cum-IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, dismissing the application I.A.No.674 of 2009 in O.P.No.425 of 2007, filed under Order-1 Rule-10 and Section 151 C.P.C., seeking to add a third party, by name Darsiplamu Dandu Prasad, as the second respondent in the main O.P.. 3. Perused the impugned order and other relevant material papers on record. 4. The petitioner-husband filed the said O.P., against the first respondent herein-wife, seeking divorce, on the grounds of cruelty, desertion and adulterous life. He filed the present application seeking to add one Darsiplamu Dandu Prasad as a necessary party in the O.P. 5. In fact, the relief sought for by the petitioner amounts to unnecessarily involving a person at a belated stage, inasmuch as, no particulars of the said third party have been furnished along with the O.P. In all probability, this appears to be an after thought of the petitioner. There is no clinching factor shown by the petitioner to enable the Court to pass an order making the third party as a necessary party to the O.P. The relief sought for by the petitioner, virtually, amounts to unnecessarily affecting the public life of others. 6. For the foregoing reasons, I absolutely see no reason to interfere with the impugned order, passed by the Court below, and hence, the Civil Revision Petition is liable to be dismissed. 7. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, at the stage of admission. However, there shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA 12th March 2010 dr