1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.657/2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2561/1992 (D) Prakash s/o Natthu Khobragade ...Versus... Lalibai Gotu Surele (Dead) through L.Rs. and others ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri R.J. Mirza, Adv. for applicant] [Shri S.K. Sable, Adv. for respdt. Nos.1 to 5] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 18.06.2009 This Court looking to the predicament of the review petitioner in not getting back his land which was given by him to the tribal in exchange made attempts by asking Tahsildar concerned to help the review petitioner in getting back his land. Tahsildar, however, placed on record a report saying that his land was sold by the tribal and somebody else is the owner thereof. It is true that the review petitioner is thus straightway deprived of his property, but then it is he who endeavoured to purchase the property of the tribal. Now since his property has changed hand it is difficult to do anything further for the petitioner. Advocate Shri Sable for respondent Nos.1 to 5 makes a statement that in accordance with the provisions of Sections 3 and 4 of the Maharashtra 2 Restoration of Lands to the Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 he is ready to pay the amount on the basis of 48 times of the assessment of the land revenue on the land in question within a period of six months from today as compensation for the land received in exchange by the tribal i.e. his client. The review petition is, thus, dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE ssw