CRM-M No. 30237 of 2011(O&M) **** Rakesd alias Boda vs. State of Haryana Present: Mr. Narender Sura, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shekhar Mudgal, AAG, Haryana. **** This is a petition for regular bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 197 dated 18.06.2009, under Sections 302, 307/34, 148, 149, 212,404, 120- B IPC and section 25/54/59 of the Arms act, registered at Police Station Sampla, Distt. Rohtak. On 18.10.2011 the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel has argued that the petitioner has now been in custody for 2 years and 2 months, he was not named in the FIR and the allegation against him is otherwise hard to believe since as per the said allegation he informed the main accused about the presence of the victim. As per learned counsel the sister of the petitioner was getting married and on that day there was no occasion or motive for him to go and inform about the presence of one guest to the murderers.” Learned AAG, on instructions from ASI Sukhbir Singh, has accepted the other factual assertions but has denied the argument that there was no occasion or motive for the petitioner to inform the main accused. Be that as it may, considering the period of incarceration and the role attributed to the petitioner, without commenting on the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner. Bail to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE November 25, 2011 sunita