IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.56744 of 2007 SK.MUSTAFA @ SEKH MUSTAFA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 15.5.2008 Heard. This is a case under Sections 302/201 of the IPC. Petitioner is said to have committed murder of the deceased, his step brother. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case merely on suspicion because he had always differences with the deceased on the point of family property. In the entire case diary only this fact has come that 2-3 days prior to the occurrence the petitioner had directed the deceased to go with an unknown person by a motor cycle and then he also followed them on foot. But, learned counsel submitted that this is a very weak kind of evidence. The statement of the wife of the deceased that the petitioner threatened her not to identify the dead body of the deceased is also a concocted case as because the petitioner had differences with the deceased, hence, all the fingers are being pointed to him. No one has seen committing the crime and on the basis of the circumstances only he cannot be denied bail. The petitioner is ready to face the trial. Considering the above submissions, petitioner Sk.Mustafa @ Sekh Mustafa is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 223 of 2006. DKS/ (Rekha Kumari, J)