IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6490 of 2006 1. RAM SAROOP SAH @ RAM RUP SAH SON OF LATE KANHA SAH. 2. HEMANT KUMAR SON OF RAMSWAROOP SAH @ RAMRUP SAH, BOTH RESDIENTS OF VILLAGE TARIYAMA ANCHAL AND P.S. SIMARI BAKHTIYARPUR, DISTRICT SAHARSA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAM SUNDAR SAH. 3. BHUBNESHWAR SAH, BOTH SONS OF LATE GULAY SAH, RESIDENT OF MAUZA LAGMA, ANCHAL AND P.S. SIMARI BAKHTIYARPUR, DISTRICT SAHARSA. ----------- 02. 05.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. From perusal of impugned order dated 9.3.2006 passed by the Addl. District Judge, FTC No.5, Saharsa in Misc. Appeal No.21 of 2004, Annexure-1 it appears the appellate court has asked the trial court to first consider the report of the Pleader Commissioner and thereafter liberty has been granted to the plaintiff to apply for injunction with direction to the trial court to consider the documents of both sides. In the circumstances, I do not see any illegality in the impugned order. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)