IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2279 of 2009 MD.ZAHID HUSSAIN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04 29.04.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, the Informant and the State. The petitioner is the Mukhiya renewing his prayer for anticipatory bail in a police case under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. By order dated 4.3.2009 the District Magistrate, Madhubani was directed to file affidavit. Such affidavit has been filed. The facts transpiring now are that at the time that one Md. Allaudin, the brother-in-law of the informant was the Up-Mukhiya, the name of the husband of the petitioner was included in the B.P.L. list. The fresh Counter affidavit on behalf of the District Magistrate states that the name of the husband of the informant has subsequently been deleted from the list of below the poverty line. Counsel for the informant submits that all this is after the institution of the First Information Report. The allegations are with regard to sum of Rs.2000/-. The name of the husband of the petitioner was included at a time when the own brother is the Up-Mukhiya and now - 2 - his name is being deleted. Petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate in connection with Pandaul P.S. case No. 07 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Navin Sinha,J.) A.Kumarui