IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27125 of 2010 VINAY CHOUDHARY @ VINAY KR. CHOUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.07.2010. On 10.05.2010, the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 10716 of 2010 in connection with Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case No. 555 of 2009 registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468/34, 120(B) of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the Lottery Act on the oral submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Before furnishing bail bond the deponent came to know about involvement of the petitioner in other three cases as stated in paragraph no. 7 of the petition hence the present anticipatory bail application has been filed. Since the petitioner is involved in other three cases of similar nature, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case No. 555 of 2009 pending in the court of the learned C.J.M., Muzaffarpur, on this ground alone, however, the learned court below will consider the fact that on merits the petitioner was 2 granted anticipatory bail on 10.05.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 10716 of 2010, Annexure-3 suggests that the petitioner is suffering from fracture injury while deciding the regular bail and may dispose off the same if possible on the same day. Let the order be transmitted to the learned C.J.M., Muzaffarpur, in connection with Muzaffarpur Town P.S. case No. 555 of 2009 through fax at the cost of the petitioner. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)