IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 3955 of 2009 Between: Budapati Venkata Narayana S/o.Kotaiah Kondepi Gramapanchayat, R/o.Kondepi village & Mandal Prakasam District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Ongole,Prakasam District 2 The District Panchayat Officer, Prakasam District Ongole 3 The Project Director, Draught Water and Management Agency, National village compulsory Employement Scheme Ongole, Prakasam District 4 The A.P.O., Draught Water and Management Agency Kondepi Mandal, Kondepi,Prakasam District 5 The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Kondepit Mandal, Prakasam District 6 Moraboina Chinayogaiah S/o.Narasaiah Kondepi Grampanchayat, Kondepi village & Mandal Prakasam District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the in action of the 2nd respondent in not passing appropriate orders on the representation dated 21.2.2009 made complaining about the fraud is being done by the 6th respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent Nos.1 to 5 not to disburse the funds towards the Sanction letter No.45/2008-09 and approved vide No.D1/278/NREGS/2008-09 dated 20.12.2008. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.3955 of 2009 Order: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 02.06.2009 VGB