IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15198 of 2009 Date of decision:17.03.2010 M/s Adson Software Pvt. Ltd. Company and another ....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr. Animesh Sharma, Advocate, for Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ravi Dutt Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondents 1 to 3. Mr. Amit Kamboj, Advocate, for Mr. Arun Walia, Advocate, for respondents 4 and 5. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) 1. Mr. Devendra Nimbokar, DTP (HQ), office of DTCP, Haryana at Chandigarh, is present in Court and the learned counsel appearing for the State states on instructions that the objection of the petitioners as regards the non-existence of the alleged nala shown in the development plan is partially correct and they have now proposed a realignment of the nala and a fresh publication will be effected inviting objections for such publication in the gazette. The statement of the Civil Writ Petition No.15198 of 2009 - 2 - counsel for the respondents is taken on record and the petition is disposed of as infructuous reserving the liberty to the petitioners to state their objections if they are aggrieved by any modified plan that is published in the official gazette. (K.KANNAN) 17.03.2010 JUDGE sanjeev