HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.19075 of 2008 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks directions by way of writ of Mandamus to direct respondent Nos.1 to 4 to consider his representations, dated 31.05.2008 and 14.02.2008, pending on their file. It is the case of the petitioner that he is the owner of the house bearing H.No.8-3-676/1/A/8/2 situated at Yellareddyguda, Hyderabad and that the fifth respondent had constructed a multistoried building towards northern side of his house. The main grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the fifth respondent had constructed toilets and bathrooms adjacent to his house illegally and unauthorisedly and in spite of filing representations in this regard, respondent Nos.2 to 4 have not taken any steps for removal of the said structures. In this case, it is to be noted that the petitioner approached civil Court by filing a suit in O.S.No.43 of 2006 on the file of IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. A perusal of the judgment in the aforesaid suit makes it clear that the petitioner has filed the said suit against the very same respondents for mandatory injunction for removal of illegal constructions abutting to his house bearing No.8-3-676/1/A/8/1 situated at Yellareddyguda, Hyderabad. The said suit was dismissed by the judgment and decree, dated 23.01.2008. In the representations filed by the petitioner, dated 31.05.2008 and 14.02.2008, his main grievance is with regard to removal of the illegal constructions, which are the subject matter of the suit in O.S.No.43 of 2006. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the findings recorded in the said suit, it is for him to pursue appropriate remedies available to him under law by way appeal, but having filed the suit and more particularly, when the suit was dismissed, he cannot seek the relief under the guise of disposal of his representations. For the aforesaid short ground, the relief as prayed for in the writ petition cannot be granted. The writ petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. _____________________ (R. SUBHASH REDDY, J) Dt.06.09.2010 VGB