HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY TAKEN UP WRIT PETITION Nos.13437, 13727 & 13733 of 2007 Dated:02.07.2007 TAKEN UP WRIT PETITION No..13437 of 2007: Between: Haseena Parveen …Petitioner And: The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool and another. …Respondents AND TAKEN UP WRIT PETITION No.13727 of 2007: Between: S.Haseena Parveen …Petitioner And: The Station House Officer, City Crime Station, Kurnool and another. …Respondents AND TAKEN UP WRIT PETITION No.13733 of 2007: Between: S.Humerabanu …Petitioner And: The Station House Officer, City Crime Station, Kurnool and another. …Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY TAKEN UP WRIT PETITION Nos. 13437, 13727 & 13733 of 2007 ORAL COMMON ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R.Varma) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in W.P.No.13437 of 2007 and the learned Assistant Government Pleader, representing the learned Advocate General, appearing for the respondents, in all the writ petitions. 2. Since the grievance of the petitioners, in all the writ petitions, is one and the same, they are being disposed of by this common order. 3. The allegation in all the writ petitions is that one S.Anwar Hussain and one Khaleel Ahmed were illegally detained by the police personnel of City Crime Station, Kurnool. 4. In response to the notices, issued by this Court, the Sub-Inspector of Police, City Crime Station, Kurnool, filed counter-affidavit stating, inter alia, that the Police of Tamilnadu were in search of the alleged detenus in connection with Crime No.111 of 2007, registered for the offence punishable under Section 395 I.P.C., Crime No.51 of 2007, registered for the offence punishable under Section 397 I.P.C., of Ponnagaram Police Station of Dharmapuri District, Tamilnadu and Crime Nos.51 and 52 of 2007, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 448 and 397 I.P.C., of Merapuram Police Station of Dharmapuri District, Tamilnadu, hence, they took assistance of the Police of City Crime Station, Kurnool, while apprehending them. It is further stated that the alleged detenus were examined after their apprehension and were subsequently released on 26.06.2007, and, as of now, the alleged detenus are moving freely. This fact has been admitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in W.P.No.13437 of 2007. 5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and as the alleged detenus are moving freely, we do not find any exigency to continue the writ petitions any longer and are liable to be closed. 6. In the result, the writ petitions are closed, at the stage of admission. However, there shall be no order as to costs. _______________ D.S.R.VARMA, J ____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 02.07.2007 DR