IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7369 of 2011 1. DINESH RAM (HUSBAND) 2. UMESH RAM (BROTHER-IN-LAW) Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SMT. PANO DEVI, WIFE OF DINESH RAM. ----------- 2 31.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners have renewed their prayer for anticipatory bail in Complaint Case No. C-64 of 2001 pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., East Muzaffarpur in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioners’ anticipatory bail application was earlier rejected vide Cr. Misc. No.24678 of 2002 on 03.10.2002. This Court is not inclined to take a different view. However, let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner keeping in view that the matter relates to 498A I.P.C., and the matter has been settled between the parties and the fact that others have already been granted anticipatory bail. 2 With the above observation, this application is, accordingly, disposed off. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)