IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22627 of 2010 1. SUDHAN PRASAD @ SUDHAN PRASAD GUPTA S/O SHIVLAGAN PRASAD, R/O MOHALLA- BILAYATI BARI, P.S. & DISTRICT- KISHANGANJ, PERMANENT R/O BARADIA, N.H.-31, P.S.- CHAKULIA, DISTRICT- NORTH DINAJPUR, DISTRICT- WEST BENGAL 2. SHEIKH ALAM @ S.K. ALAM, S/O SHAJARAT HUSSAIN R/O MOHALLA- RAJAPUR, P.S.- DHOLI SAKARA, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT VILLAGE- TEUSA BALIACHAK, P.S.- GWALPOKHAR, DISTRICT- NORTH DINAJPUR, WEST BENGAL 3. KARNAL SINGH @ KARNEL SING, S/O SHRI BACHAN SINGH, DANGI BASTI, P.S.& DISTRICT- KISHANGANJ 4. JASPAL SINGH, S/O SHRI HARBANSH SINGH, MOHALLA- KISHANGANJ, P.S.& DISTRICT- KISHANGANJ, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT – VILLAGE GHORDAPA, P.S.- PANJIPADA, DISTRICT- NORTH DINAJPUR, WEST BENGAL 5. ASHOK SINGH W/O SHRI BACHENDRA SINGH, VILLAGE- ASURAGARH, P.S.- CHAKULIA, DISTRICT- NORTH DINAJPUR, WEST BENGAL ………….Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THRU. VIG. …………..Opposite Party ----------- 2. 10.03.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners have sought quashing of the order dated 2.6.2010 passed by the Special Judge Vigilance-II, Patna, in Special Case No. 33/1997, by which an application under Section 239 Cr.P.C. has been disallowed. It has been submitted that it is only on speculation that the present First Information Report has been instituted and there is no documentary proof to substantiate the allegation. Since even suspicion is enough to put a person on trial, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )