IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25753 of 2011 Ram Parvesh Thakur, Son of Damodar Thakur, resident of village Bhimpurwan, P.S. Mohammadpur, District Gopalganj. ---------- Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar. 2.Nirmala Devi, Wife of Ram Parvesh Thakur, D/O Sheonath Thakur, resident of village Usari, P.S. Basantpur, District Siwan. -------- Opposite Parties ----------- 02/- 24/08/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1756 of 2008 for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 406 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, is named accused in this complaint case being husband of the complainant with general allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. in spite of being blessed with one female child. Submission is that petitioner intends to resume and continue the matrimonial relationship with the complainant, who is residing at her parents place with her only female child and in view of the order passed in a procedure under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, petitioner has been regularly paying per month a sum of Rs. 1,500/- to the complainant and Rs. 800/- to the daughter by way of interim maintenance. There is no due till date and petitioner further, undertakes to continue the payment till any order on the point by the competent court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on the event of filing an application before the court below stating such 2 intention as stated above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1756 of 2008, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation or even on single default in payment, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)