CMP 184/98 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO.184/98 Tejaram Versus Ramvilas Gupta & Ors. DATE OF ORDER :: 04/10/2007 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Shivlal Meena, for petitioner Mr. D.D. Khandelwal, for respondents *** Instant petition has been filed by complainant-petitioner assailing the order dated 20th February, 1997 whereby learned Revisional Court has set aside the order taking cognizance against accused-non-petitioners by learned Magistrate dated 13th November, 1996. Complainant-petitioner filed a private complaint against accused-non-petitioners for offence u/ss.469, 500, 504, 218 & 120-B IPC on 15th March, 1996 and statements u/ss.200 & 202 Cr.P.C. were recorded and the learned trial Judge took cognizance against accused-non-petitioners u/ss.500 read with Section 120-B under order impugned dated 13th November, 1996. Against the said order, accused preferred revision petition which was allowed on 20th February, 1997 and the order taking cognizance against them was set aside. CMP 184/98 [2] I have considered the submissions of counsel for parties and perused the order impugned. This court is of the opinion that Court of Revision has given cogent reasons while setting aside the order taking cognizance against accused-non-petitioners dated 13th November, 1996 and it does not call for interference. Consequently, the misc. petition fails and is hereby dismissed. Record be sent back to trial court. [AJAY RASTOGI],J. FRBOHRA,JR.P.A.184CMP1998 4-10.doc