1 Cri.Appln.No.784/2011 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.784/2011. (Nitin @ Tinkya Magan Pawar Vs. The State of Mah.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.AS Usmanpurkar, Adv. for applicant; Mr.KM Suryawanshi, APP for State. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 18 th March, 2011. ... 1) Heard Mr.Usmanpurkar. 2) The accused, in custody from 2nd December, 2010 for an offence under Section 395 of IPC in Crime No. 240/20101, seeks bail. 3) The complainant indeed informed that the robbers were three persons. Said three persons were arrested. Thereafter the applicant came to be arrested. Rs. 20,000/- is allegedly recovered from him. The suspects followed the complainant on a motor-bike, intercepted, assaulted with a rod and one of them snatched the bag, containing currency notes. In the identification parade held on 17.3.2011 the accused/applicant Nitin @ Tinkya, is not identified. 2 Cri.Appln.No.784/2011 4) Considering these aspects, since the investigation is complete and nothing is to be recovered, the accused/applicant deserves to be released on bail. Hence, order. 5) The applicant/accused be released on his furnishing a PR bond and a surety in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand); 6) After release, the applicant/accused shall attend the concerned Investigator on every alternate Sunday, between 3.00 to 6.00 p.m. till further orders. The applicant/accused shall desist from influencing the witnesses and committing identical offence. 7) Criminal Application disposed of in aforesaid terms. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/