IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT CONTEMPT CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 89 OF 2003. PETITION NO. 89 OF 2003. PETITION NO. 89 OF 2003. National Heavy Engineering Kamkar Sanghatana. ... Petitioner. Versus. Kartarsingh Bhuria, Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies. ... Respondent. Shri Sanjay Udeshi i/by M/s.Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for the Petitioner. Shri Suresh Kumar along with Ms.Rutika Ambekar for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 7th June, 2007. : 7th June, 2007. : 7th June, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the parties. The breach alleged in this petition is of the order dated 5th September 2000 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.4416 of 2000. By the said order, the 1st Respondent was directed to hear the parties and to pass appropriate orders within a period of two months. There is an affidavit-in-reply filed on 20th February 2004 by the 1st Respondent. In the said reply, it is pointed out that the direction given by this Court has been complied with though belatedly. In paragraph 15 of the affidavit, unconditional apology has been tendered for not complying with the direction within the time fixed by this Court. There is an explanation for the delay. : 2 : 2 : 2 : 2. The unconditional apology tendered by the 1st Respondent deserves to be accepted. In view of the subsequent compliance with the order, no further action is required to be taken against the contemnor. Hence notice issued to the contemnor is discharged and the contempt petition is disposed of accordingly. Judge. Judge. Judge.