l^ StNGLE BEN IN THE HON'BLE HIGI-1 COURT OF CHHATTCSGARH AT BILASPUR PETETCONER ...'!''>'' c^'i' ..^"^ ^,^ ^..^- WRIT PETITCON fS) NO.&O.I3../2010 f Chaman Lal Chandr'anahu, Son of Shn' Chherka Ram Chandranahu, aged about 55 years (U.T.D.), R/o. village Jasar-a, P.0. Bade Gantuli, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh, at present working in 6ovt. Pre- Middle School, Andola, Block Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.6.), VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through ; The Secretary, Education Depart- ment, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.6.), 2. < District Educatin Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.6.), 3.''' Block Education Officer, Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITEON UNDER ARTECLE 226 OF THE COUNSTETUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS !/s^^ \0..'-'' •^4^y ^I^P^T I^TN? '^2TT 3H^?T ^>t| ~5^ ^Nici^, ®til'H'i6,fsiciiyy /.pte) (r<,,-6oiziLo an^l Tl^ir (1<=l{^»<<tT) ^RIIWHft'd 311^1 qil^Eciqh T^FRTf ^* f^^t' T^R^H ^3TfilH3!I^?I 21.10.2010 Shri R.S.Patel, counsel foi SEit Smita Gtiai, P.L. for the petitioner. Counsel for the pentionei entifled to benefit of two advan<| having passed D.Ed. examniati.(j own cost. It is sutoiaitted that tl petition is no longer res integra\ decided by the Hon'ble Supreitie subDiits fhat fhe pentioner is e m.ci^nients on accouat of he 'n after his appoiatanent at his ie issue involved iu the present aad fhe same bas been fuialiy Court io. tlie case of Asha Saxeaa Vs. State of M.P. & Orsl 2009 PIIJIWPJR (SCj 59. It is further submitted tht siuular view iu its order dated 6257/2008. Couasel for fbe oider dated 29..4.2010 passed wherein relyiag upon fhe judgraj case ofAsha Saseaa (siipra) aa<|] in another Writ Appeal No. issued for consideration of tliel iiicreiiients as per circular dateil of Madhva Pradesh, after verifict petition. bt this Court has also taken a ^.2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No, Delltioner further submits ttiat ftie |in V^rit Appeal N0. 124/2009, ^nt ofthe Suprenie Coiu-t in fhe the order passed by this Court ^7/2009, directions have been case for grant of tsc-o advance 21.9.1974 issued by tlie State ^.tion of fhe facts pleaded ia the Counsel for the Statc sull woutd also be considered oa fhel inits that case. of ttie petitioner / same tiaes. ', / XI-HC—78 ^IN^S a>+(l<sb ^°f •^ii^id^, ^Tit'y^ito, f"i<iiyli< !.(?- &3 (T^- 6<-i^'il ^ an^T ipRT ('^3^() (TO^IW Wlf3?I^7r shW* 'TOnWHftcf sn^i In view of above, the pe direction to the resuondent aufho: petitioner for grant of two advan dated 21.9.1974 issued by the S verification of fhe facts oleaded iu eight weeks from todav. CM<ll(t'L!lT1 *iWV^ ^ ^^ <f^t^j< ^aiRmant?! tition is disposed of with a -ities to decide the claiia of the ce iacreinents as per circular tate of Madhya Pradesb after the petition wifhia a period of Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge