IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Misc.Nos.3720-22 of 2011 & Civil Writ Petition No.1123 of 2004 Krishan Kumar Vs. Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation, Panchkula & others Present: Mr.Vikrant Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. This writ petition was filed by Shri Jagbir Malik, Advocate which came up for hearing before this court on 23.1.2004. The counsel had sought time to place on record the instructions that 12% quota had been reserved for AMIE Engineers. The case was adjourned sine-die to enable the counsel to place on record the relevant instructions. The application has now been filed through another counsel after expiry of more than seven years to place on record some documents. Still, there is no document placed on record to clearly show that 12% quota was reserved for AMIE Engineers. It will not be fair to interfere in this writ petition after lapse of such a long time, even if the petitioner is able to establish that 12% quota is reserved for AMIE Engineers. I am not inclined to go into the prayer made in this writ petition at this stage. Dismissed. March 14, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE