IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4980 of 2010 TARUN KUMAR SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 15.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail in a case registered under Sections 364A, 379, 344, 368 and 120B of the I.P.C. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the petitioner's name sprang up during investigation. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that similarly situated accused persons have been granted bail and one of such orders have been brought on record by way of Annexure-2. Considering the trial court's report at Flag-"A" that six witnesses have already been examined on that ground alone, I am not inclined to interfere at present. However, if the trial is not concluded within six months, the petitioner is liberty to renew his prayer for bail. The bail application of the petitioner is rejected. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)