HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH^ Coram: HON'BLE MR.T.P.SHARMA & HON'BLE MR.R.N. Chandrakar, JJ. AoBellants (In Jail) Respondent Criminal Appeal No. 515 of 2011 1. 2. 3. Rameshwar S/o Late Sonu Pahadi Korwa aged about 45 years. Ratiya S/o Late Sonu Pahadi Korwa aged about 29 years. Chikru S/o Shukhan Ram Pahadi Korwa aged about 35 years. All are resident of village Pumpapur, Gajarbhawana (Harraghat) P.S.-Darima Distt.- Sarguja (C.G.) Versus Stete of Chhattisgarh, Through Darima Distt. - Sarguja (C.G.) P.S. (CRIMINAL APPEAL UNDER SECTION 374 (2) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL ^:/. PROCEDURE) Present:- Shri Ajay Kumar Chandra on behalf of Shri A.N. Pandey, counsel for the appellants. Shri J.A. Lohani, Panel Lawyer for the State, ORAL JUDGMENT (Passed on 1st August, 2011) Per T.P.Sharma, J.:- 1. By this appeal, appellant has challenged the legality and propriety of the judgment of conviction & order of sentence dated 23.03.2011 passed by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Ambkapur, in Sessions Trial No.314/2006, convicted appellants under Sections 302/34 and 201/34 of the IPC and sentenced imprisonraent for life and to pay fine of Rs.1000/-, in default of paytnent of fine further to undergo R.l. for four months, R.l. for two years and to pay fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine further to undergo R.l. for two months, respectively. 2. Another appeal by three appetlants including Rameshwar has also been preferred in Cr.A.No. 514/2011. Shri R.R. Soni, counsel has made his appearance, which is also listed for consideration today. ^^ ^^ 3. Shri Ajay Kumar Chandraappearing on behalf of Shri A.N. Pandey,counsel for the appellants submits that to avoid any further complication CrA.No. 515/2011 may be dismissed as redundant and unhecessary. For arguing the matter they may represent in Cr.A.No. 514/2011 . 4. In these circumstances, Cr.A.No.515/2011 is dismissed as redundant and unnecessary. 5. Shri A.K. Chandraappearing on behalf of Shri A.N. Pandey, counsel for the appellants is permitted to represent appellants No. 2 and 3 namely Ratiya and Chikru,respectively,inCr.A.NO. 514/2011 by filing memo of appearance. 6. CopyofthisorderbeplacedinCr.A.No.514/2011. ~ —- - R-N-c^ra^ Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge -'Udg, VIjay