IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1468 of 2010 Between: K. Mallikarjun and others ... PETITIONERS AND Koguru Kannaiah and others ... RESPONDENTS ORDER: Heard the learned counsel. 2. It appears that the application had been dismissed on the ground that already there is a docket entry to the effect that the parties reported no additional written statement to be filed. Several series of incidents had been explained before this court and it is stated that it is a bona fide mistake and never the contesting parties reported no additional written statement virtually in substance the correctness of the docket entry is being questioned. 3. In the result, liberty is given to the revision petitioners to move appropriate application since this application as framed cannot be maintained unless the said docket entries, if any, if made by mistake be duly rectified. 4. The Civil Revision Petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ P.S. NARAYANA, J April 26, 2010. PN THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1468 of 2010 April 26, 2010