IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 13539 of 2011 Date of decision:-29.7.2011 Kuldeep Kaur ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Rajesh K. Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) Counsel for the petitioner contends that in pursuance to advertisement for teachers against various categories the petitioner had applied for the post of Lecturer in Commerce. As per merit obtained by the petitioner she was to appear in the third counselling, which was held on 6.7.2011 but the petitioner was not able to attend that counselling and the candidates below in the merit to the petitioner have been selected and given appointments. Respondent No.4 is having 46.640 marks and respondent No.5 is having 41.720 marks whereas the petitioner was having 56.723 marks. Representation (Annexure P-6) in this regard has been made by the petitioner. This writ petition is disposed of by giving directions to the respondents to decide the representation (Annexure P-6) by passing a speaking order in this regard within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. July 29, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Vijay Asija JUDGE