IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.969 of 2007 1. MALTI SINGH alias Malti Sinha wife of Ram Umedan Singh, 2. Ram Umedan Singh son of late Deo Nandan Singh, both residents of village Bakhaura, P.S. Rohtas, District Rohtas, at present residing at mohalla Kirani Ghat, P.S. Kotwali, District Gaya, … …Defendants/Petitioners Versus 1. KRISHNA PRASAD son of late Manik Chand, 2. Mostt. Premsheela Devi wife of late Subhash Prasad, both residents of Plot No. 46/47 (Old 44(New) Ward No. V, Mohalla Ramna Road, P.S. Civil Line, District Gaya… Plaintiffs/Opposite Parties 3. Smt. Indramati Devi wife of late Sarwan Kumar, 4. Sushil Kumar Gupta son of late Sarwan Kumar, both residents of village Akbarpur (Nadipar), P.S. Rohtas, District Rohtas, 5. Smt. Satwanti Kuer wife of Shro Prasad Dikshit, resident of village Bardiha (Kakharpur), P.S. Nabinagar, District Aurangabad, … Defendants/Opposite Parties For the Petitioners: Ms. Chanchal Kumari Singh, Advocate ----------- 5 18.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this Civil Revision to enable the petitioners to avail any other remedy available to them under law, as in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Shiv Shakti Cooperative Housing Society, Nagpur v. Swaraj Developers and others ((2003) 6 Supreme Court Cases, 659, and Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chandra Rai and others ((2003) 6 2 Supreme Court Cases, 675) the Civil Revision would not be maintainable. In the above view of matter, this Civil Revision is dismissed as withdrawn. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)