IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2012 of 2010 PAPPU KUMAR YADAV S/O LATE CHAMRU LAL YADAV R/O VILL.- NAVTOLIA, P.S.- TARAPUR, DISTT.- MUNGER, AGENT TARAPUR BUS STAND, TARAPUR, MUNGER _______________ Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CUM DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, MUNGER 3. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MUNGER 4. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUNGER 5. SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TARAPUR, MUNGER 6. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MUNGER 7. ZILA PARISHAD, MUNGER, THROUGH DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER CUM CHIEF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ZILLA PARISHAD, MUNGER 8. OFFICER-IN-CHARGE TARAPUR POLICE STATION, TARAPUR, MUNGER 9. VINAY YADAV S/O RAMASHRAY YADAV R/O VILL.- MADHURA, P.S.- TARAPUR, DISTT.- MUNGER ___________ Respondents ----------- 02. 05.02.2010 This is a premature writ application in the sense that petitioner has rushed to the High Court challenging the issuance of notice to him by the Secretary of the Regional Transport Authority to whom he says has no authority to issue such notice. Let the petitioner first appear before the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority (respondent No.2), take his objection including the objection of jurisdiction if he is so advised. The Secretary will be well advised to pass order in this regard. Once order in this regard is passed, petitioner may have or may not have occasion to agitate the matter. 2 The writ application is dismissed with above observation. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J )