1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1574/2009. Boduram. VERSUS Chhotu Ram and Others. 04.03.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Gaurav Gupta, for the petitioner. ***** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order dated 24.01.2009 by which the application submitted by the petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10(2) C.P.C. for impleading the Assistant Engineer and Junior Engineer of the National Highway Authority and the Collector, Jaipur as party to the suit has been rejected. The plaint in question has been filed by the petitioner as Annexure-1 in which the relief which has been sought is in respect of the land which as per the plaintiff belongs to the Municipality, Shahpura. In the suit for permanent injunction, the prayer made is that the Municipality and the authorities of the same be restrained from issuing any patta in favour of the private defendants No.1 and 4 in respect of the aforesaid land. The application was submitted by the petitioner for impleading the authorities of the National Highway Authority and the Collector as party alleging that a 2 notification has been issued for acquiring the land for the purposes of expansion of National Highway and, therefore, they should be impleaded as party to the suit. I am of the view that the National Highway Authority of India being the successor-in-interest of the Municipality and the same would be bound by the decree that may be passed against the Municipality and no amendment of the plaint is required even otherwise if the land is acquired for the National Highway the question of issuing pattas does not arise. In the facts and circumstances, therefore, there is no merit in this writ petition and the same is dismissed summarily. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.