S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.24/08 Date:15/07/2008 HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE ASHOK PARIHAR Mr. Pankaj Jain, for appellants. Mr. Sailesh Prakash Sharma, for respondent. BY THE COURT: Counsel for the plaintiff-respondent submits that possession of the suit property has already been handed over by the defendant-appellant and further no rent is due upto the date of handing over the possession. Counsel for the appellant has no instructions. In view of statement made on behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, in my opinion, no further consideration is required in the present matter. Learned counsel for the plaintiff-respondent, however, submitted that at the time of taking possession some articles were lying in the suit property for which an inventory has already been prepared and defendant is always free to take possession of those articles after giving proper receipt to the plaintiff-respondent. Even otherwise, since on the basis of concurrent findings of fact after due consideration proper discretion has already been used by both the courts below, no further interference is called for by this court. The appeal is dismissed accordingly with liberty to the appellant to take his articles as per statement made by the counsel for the plaintiff-respondent, if he so chooses. (Ashok Parihar) J.