C^-1^5/^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OP CHHAmSGARH. BILASPUR C.G, WRIT PETITION N0. ^^/^006 ^ PETITIONER ^'^y ..'' ^^/ ^M^ ~.//^'\^-" ./ -^' ^-•-y^ ^•-^> ^•' ^ .ff^'y" RESPONDENTS /•' .r^ft. I>;-^.-^ /&' PETITION z* Virendra Kumar Mishra, s/o Late Shri Vidyadhar Mishra, aged about 60 years, retired as Subedar-M (Head Clerk), in the Department of Home (Police), R/o. Bouripara, Ambikapur, Post - Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State ofChhattisgarh, Through- the secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director General of Police, Police Headquarters, Raipur (C.G.) ,3. The Superintendent of Police, Police District- Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.) 4. The Joint Director, Funds, Accounts & Pensions, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT/WRITS, ORDER/ORDERS. OR/AND DIRECTION / DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI, OR OF ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE NATURE. {^(" XI-HC-78 tlWCTT sRtTRi 3^ •^WM^, e-^WW, R|<iwy ..VJ^^P...^h°^200^ 3ii^i sia<*> (y?jcii^<T) a'n^r^iTf^TR) (raran^r^iira; ?T(TrmBli?r3n^r 29-8-2006 Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Shri Satlsh Gupta, counsel for the petitioner. peputy Govt. Advocats for the State/respondents, on adv^nce copy. Heard. The case 0< the petlltlonerls that he demitted the gfflce on attaitlning 31st Deeember, 2005, whlli Clerk). However, hls pen by respondent No.4. Even Surajpur has recommended deci.dj.ng hls penslon case to the peti tioner. Learned courael f6f to which learned cognsei objection. fair and reasonable. The to decl.de pension case of with the dj.rectj.on disposed of. <«il<<?M<f1-) »114<lT^"teI^<Rl^:K ^sil^ii-gn^r jthe age o£ superannuation on ^ working as Subedar-M (Head ^lencase 1s not being deci.ded the Superlntendent of Pollce. )Eor f-lxlng pay of the petltioner. and for paying reti.ral benef.i.ts the petltloner submltted that in the circiunstances, resbondent No.4 be directed to decide pension case of the petit|ioner and to pay all retiral dues, fcr the respondents has no Having heard learnep eounsel for the partles, having regard t©the facts ahd xxjs circumstanees of the cas®, prayer made by learned co|iins&l for the petitioner is just. >|refore, respondent No.4 is direeted the petitloner, after considering a-ll the relevant orders p|assed by Superlntendent of Poliae and other documents in thje serviee record of the petj.tloner, withln a period of 30 dayjs from the date of recelpt o£ copy of this order, In acfsordanGe wlth law. aforesald, the pet-ttlon stands Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge %a3^- /^ <^