IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr.M.M.O. No. 96 of 2008 Date of Decision: 7th July, 2010 __________________________________________________________ Janak Singh. ….Petitioner. Versus Renu Kumari and another. ….Respondents. ___________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the Petitioner: Mr. N.K. Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate. __________________________________________________________ Dev Darshan Sud, J. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Una in revision preferred by the petitioner against the order passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Court No. (1), Una, allowing the petition of the respondents herein under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure granting maintenance to the respondents. In revision, the learned Sessions Judge accepted the revision and disallowed the maintenance to Smt. Renu respondent No. 1 and increased the maintenance granted to respondent No. 2 from Rs. 400/- to 700/-. The petitioner has now filed this petition 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure challenging the legality of the order. 2. Without entering into the merit or what has been ordered by the learned Appellate Court, I do not consider this to be a fit case to exercise powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, as the maintenance amount is very meager i.e. only Rs. 700/- per month. This petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. July 07, 2010 (Dev Darshan Sud) (ms) Judge