1 cri appln 342.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 342 OF 2011 1. Thakaram S/o Uttam Dudhawade and another .. Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mrs. M. A. Kulkarni, Advocate for Applicants. Shri S. G. Nandedkar, A.P.P. for the Respondent/State. CORAM : S. S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 01ST MARCH, 2011. PER COURT : . Heard learned counsel for the applicants/appellants and learned Additional Public Prosecutor. From the perusal of the impugned judgment, it appears that the appellants/accused are convicted for the offence punishable U/Sec. 324 r/w Sec. 34 of the I. P. Code and sentenced to suffer R. I. for one year and to pay fine of Rs. 500/- each and in default to suffer S. I. for six months. Already this Court has suspended the sentence by order dated 03.02.2011 till date. In my opinion, the appeal is not likely to be 2 cri appln 342.11 heard in near future. The applicants/appellants were on bail during the pendency of trial and they have not misused the bail. Therefore, application for bail is allowed and same stands disposed of. The applicants/appellants be released on bail, same bail on fresh bond. 2. The Record and Proceedings be sent back to the concerned Court for preparation of the paper book and the concerned Court to prepare the paper book at the earliest and sent it to this Court without any delay. [S. S. SHINDE, J.] bsb/March. 11