1\%^/ ^'SSiS^" ^§ ^ToET -diqittO, yo1<(1<l<»,Hwi1t1^'< •*%sS^S ^.i-s's^' >& _._ l >-Prc;^. 6^qS^^ tiTqcCT ^TT^ •—•^•ir"^-/-^-^:r-"^^200 3I1^9T q^P (l^g6K) ^ 3lrt»T9)TR'<i<h aansn^sTrtiii* gTBTW ^lfeT 311^91 PETITIONER Panna L^l Nag S/o Shri Matadin Nag Aged about 50 year^, Occupation Service, Posted as Sub Inspectot', at Police Station Narharpur, Distt. Kanker(pG) Vlersus RESPONDENTS 3. 4. 5. StateofCI Through Mantrala;] Director Civil Line^ Inspector Police Lin( Superintei (CG) Elecdon Election Hoine, (ihattisgarh, Secretary, Department of <a, DKS Building, Raipur (CG) (]reneral of Police, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG) IGeneral of Police, Police Head Quarter i^ Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) (•ident of Police Kanker, Distt. Kanker Writ Petition under Articld S.B Hon'bleShri Dhireadra Mishra, J. 10.11.2008 Mr. Sunil Sahu, counsel Ms. Sunita Jain; PL for thi Mr. AS Gaharwar, counseJ The peutioner, who is a £ of the State, has impugned his 24.10.2008 whereby he has Kanker to Beejapur and direc positivel;/ by 25.10.2008. Leamed counsel for the has already put in 25 years of <hl<lFcl41'1 *fl*(dT^'fs'<l •tlul'K;!'! ^3fRl*13II^?T (pommission of India, through Secretary Qommission, New Delhi. 226 of the Constitution of India fijir the petitioner. State. : for the respondent No. 5. [ub Inspector in the police department itransfer order of Annexure P/1 dated bejen transferred from Narharpur, Distt. :[ed to report to his place of posting Ipetitioner submits that the pedtioner jervice in the naxalite areas and as per ..^:3a%. ^-•^F'i^ 'i^ 1 fiaBsil;H^78 I, ^%i J \. ^.^./ dCT| "yi«i«<l,t»Tnll(1<l<S,Rl<')l'«li'< *lllc9l ^TT^ an^ST q^Ep (Ij?rfg5R) W^ 200 an^OTWf^Tro ?ISIT3TI^?Td>lJ* ¥RiTW(^asm^w ^- govemment policy, he is entitlei^ He further submits that he bas Annexure P/5 against his impu^ned but the same has not been not pressing this petition at direction to the respondents Annexure P/5 within a specified] for posting outside the naxalite areas. jias already filed a representadon of order before the respondent No.2, He further subraits that he is |this stage, however, he prays for a i. 2/3 to decide his representation of period in accordance with law. confeidered. Nb Mr. A.S. Gahanvar, 1{ respondent No. 5 and Ms. Sunit^. for the State submit that rejit petitioner shall be considered within a period of sbc weeks order. ahd froibi In view of above submiss the instant petition is disposed No. 2/3 to decide the within a period of sbs weeks order, in accordance with law. represent^tion froiln <pi<ifnii^i*i]*inT^ fe^ <Ri'<^it ^3lf^H3II^?T ;amed counsel appearing for the Jain, learned Panel Lawyer appearing jiresentation of Annexure P/5 of the decided by the respondents No. 2/3 the date of production of copy of this ons of leamed eounsel for the parties, of with a direction to the respondents ofAnnexure P/5 of the petitioner the date of production of copy of this Judge