IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7465 of 2010 TUNTUN MANJHI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR For the petitioner :- Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, Advocate. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate. For the State :- Mr. A. L. Pandit, A.P.P. ----------- 2. 18. 03. 2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case instituted under Section 307 and some other minor offences of the Indian Penal Code. According to F.I.R., petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the informant and two other persons by Farsa as a result of which there is injuries on their persons. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as a matter of fact, there is previous enmity because of certain land dispute between the parties and in that view of the matter, petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. In the facts and circumstances, this Court is not persuaded to accede to prayer made on behalf of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. However, if the petitioner surrenders within a period of four weeks from today and makes a prayer for regular bail to the court below, then the court below shall consider his prayer for bail on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. 2 While disposing of the prayer of bail, learned court below shall be obliged to consider all other materials including the enmity available on the record, besides submissions recorded above in this order. m.p. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)