IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No.-M- 12517 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 2.7.2009. Dinesh ....Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mrs. Sarla Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Khatkar, AAG Haryana RAJESH BINDAL, J. **** Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case a direction is issued to the Director General of Prisons Haryana to take a decision on the representation of the petitioner for transfer to Sonepat or Gurgaon. The representation is stated to be still pending. It is submitted that the petitioner belong to District Sonepat and it is difficult for his family members to visit the Jail at Karnal. It is not disputed by learned counsel for the State that the application filed by the petitioner for his transfer is still pending. Considering the aforesaid facts as the competent authority has not yet considered the request of the petitioner, without commenting on the merit of the claim made by him, I deem it appropriate to direct Director General of Prison, Haryana to decide the representation made by the petitioner for transfer to any other jail from Karnal within three months from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) 2.7.2009 JUDGE Reema