WP 7657/09 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7657/2009 _______________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | Shri A.A. Nimbalkar, Advocate h/f Shri V.D. Salunke, Advocate for petitioner. Shri K.B. Choudhary, AGP for respondent nos.1 & 2. Respondent no.3 served. CORAM: D.B. BHOSALE & R.M. BORDE, JJ. Date: 08.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. By this writ petition, the petitioner - institution is seeking direction to respondents to grant / sanction additional 9 posts for teaching and non-teaching staff as per Government resolution dated 18.8.2004 to their institution having intake capacity of 40 students. Respondent nos.1 & 2 have filed reply affidavit on 2.2.2011 and in paragraph WP 7657/09 2 11 thereof has stated thus: "I say that meanwhile, the group of writ petitions no.7328/2007 and others have came to be disposed off with directions dated 06.06.2008. As per the said directions, the issue regarding additional staff to be granted under G.R. dated 18.08.2004 was under consideration of the Government and vide decision dated 06.07.2010, the High Power Committee has taken a policy decision to absorb all surplus employees on the newly created posts to be sanctioned by G.R. dated 18.08.2004. Hereto annexed at Exhibit R-2 is the copy of the decision dt.6.7.2010. It is also submitted that the decision dated 6/7/2010 is under review of High Power Committee and the appropriate decision will be taken after the decision of the High Power Committee in this regard." In view of the statements made on affidavit, we do not find any reason to keep this writ petition pending and we are satisfied that this petition can be conveniently disposed of by the following order. The petitioner is allowed to make representation to respondent no.2 for similar prayers, as made in the writ petition, within a period of four weeks from today. If the representation is made as afore mentioned, respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the said representation within a period of 10 WP 7657/09 3 weeks therefrom in the light of the decision taken by the High Power Committee dated 6.7.2010, as stated in the affidavit dated 2.2.2011. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. (R.M. Borde, J.) (D.B. Bhosale, J.) Dt/- 08.02.2011 ndk/c82114