IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T)No. 6369 of 2008 Date of decision: 19.10.2010 Yog Raj and ors. …... Petitioner Vs. State of H.P. and anr. …. Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista , Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners are aggrieved since the ad-hoc service rendered by them followed by regular service is not counted for the purposes of increment and pension. So far as increment and pension are concerned, the issue is covered by the judgment of this court in LPA No. 36 of 2010. There will be a direction to respondents to consider the case of the petitioners in the light of judgment, referred to above and take appropriate action within four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of judgment referred to above. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. October 19, 2010 (Justice Kuldip Singh) (sks/pankaj) Judge.