1 S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. II BAIL APPLICATION NO.3076/2006 (Amit Kumar Vs. State) Date of order : 4.8.2006 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. Sanjiv Sharma, for the applicant. Mr. Vishal Raj Mehta, Public Prosecutor. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 1.6.2006 and 13.7.2006 and the case of the present applicant is not distinguishable from that of co-accused. Learned Public Prosecutor does not dispute this position. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. Accordingly, the second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the applicant Amit Kumar S/o Ram Prasad shall be released on bail (in FIR No.47/2004, P.S. 2 Maroth, District Nagour) provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- and furnishes two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so, till the completion of trial. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. arun