1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGEMENT NO. 935 OF 2003 IN SUM. SUIT NO.5145 OF 2000 Union Bank of India .. Plaintiff vs. M/s. Rose Patel Merchantile Company Ltd., .. Defendants. Warerkar i/by Warerkar & Warerkar for the plaintiff. Ms. Deepa Mani i/by S.K.Srivastava & Co. for defendants. CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J. CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J. CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J. DATE : 24th August, 2005. DATE : 24th August, 2005. DATE : 24th August, 2005. P.C. . Both the parties have filed consent terms. The same is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The suit is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. No order as to costs. 2. Refund as per rules. 2 3. In view of the disposal of the suit, the summons for judgment does not survive. The same is dismissed as infructuous.