HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISC3HATBU-ASPUR (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritlnker Divxakar) WRITRETITION (227) NQ»5948oT2008 PETITIONERS PLAlNTtFFS 1 5. 6. VERSUS RESPBNDENTS 1. DEFENDANTS Za Zb 3. Parasnath Gupta, S/o Late Rameshwar Sao, aged about % years, Occupation-KiranaBusjness Chandranafe Gupta, Sto. Late Rameshw^r Sao, aa^ about 3& yeaps, Oeeupatfon;- Fkxir MUI, Prakash Nath Giyta, S/o. Late Rameshwar Sao, ^ed afaout 35 yeare.OGcypaBon-tQranaBusine^. Smt Sfflta ©ewi;J^ ;l^to^^^^^S^ Prasact, ^^dabouf4&ye®s, Mukesh Kumar, Sto. Latse Suraj Prasad, a@edabcwife22 yearsy Poqja Supta, D/o. i-ate Suraj Prasad, aged about 2(1years, M R/o. Viilage (<6ansat>e^ Tahsit B^icha; Dista"ctJ^*iptiF(C.©^ l-almuni, Wdfo. 8amvri(6sha, ^ed about 65 years, R/o. femsabel, Tahsil Bagicha, Distrtet Jashpur (C.G.) M^. Sukbniani Bai, Vtette. IWtasat RsKd.q^efcabottt^years.Rfe '•'^ . . • GsutpatI;iam,S/o.i-ateM^atRam, aged about 28,' Za & 2b both Rfe. ViUa^- Kansabel, T^isi^ Bagieha^ EM^rict ,.l^hpi.M-(C.G.) The StateofChhattisgarh, Ttjirougli: The Collector, Jashpur, Jashpur(C.G.) Sisbict r <•< B®''g -2.- 4. The Sub-DNsteRat Offieer (Revenu^, Bs^teha Sub DKfeien, Bis&iet^ashpur(C.G.) Mr. A. K. Rrasad, counsel for the petitionecs. Mr. Awadh Tripathrand Mr. SuniJSahu,counsel"for respondentNo.t. Mr. Arun Sao, Govt. Alvoesate for p^pondents N6. 3and4. - Non&ftir respondents Nc».Za and2Ai. Wrai-PETmQI»W@Elt^^ie ^rOFTHE CO{WfiJ?yillCTk®KlN "te CtRI»R OrdeF dated 06.09.2Q08a psssed t^ ©iw Judga da^E-t, Jashpur, Dfetrict J^lipt.n', in Civit Suft No. 27-A@E%M is undeF challenge in this writ petition. By the^ orcler impygned; the trial Court hss dismissed ttie applicafiort fited by th» petitionere/plaintiffis filect uncter Ordw 7 Rute 14 of th»©odeof Ci^ Procedure forlaldnffthe ORteF-cifdtoeiEsiond!atee{3 .3.1®5& passectbytheSubDwisionatO er,ORf^O t. 2. Counset for the peBUonere/plaintife st.tonte that ttns document coytet nofr be filetf eariier: However^ virtierr certanT quesiSons werept.ittoftieplaihtiS&afcfh&thTteofcrossffiaminatkm, ttiey obtained tiwcertffiectcopyofth8saic^doctBTteRto 27.7.20G and fited itimmectiatelythereafteF. ; T . . i 3. On theother hand, supportiRgtt»orcte^jmptgfieeteounsetftM- responcteot No.1 submits ttiat the said^daajmrrent wasfitetfwiBi inocUnatedelayarKJttierefore.ttt&Courtbdow^w^falfyjysefo^^ \r ^ffK* ^.- -3- resjeetir^Ahe applteation fited bytte |»etitteBer^riaMiSsunderOrder 7 Rute 14 oftheCode of Cml Procedune. 4. J have heard couiiset^cw 'tbe^rfi^ arKl peaised Ae matorial availableonmcoFCliineluclirtg^heoi'deFimpugned. 5. Admittedly, 8ie fiwidenGe of fte plainfiBs llas not Aeen compteted as yet. Thefefwe, ttus Qoyrt Js xrf tte wiew tfeat no prejudtee is tikely totee caused toJhe slfeer oaisty if ttie relevant document is directed to be taken on reGorcl^fl'tat loo^when it js a .publjc document. Accorcttagly, ttie isailtoi^d. Otder,dated 6.9.2)08 passedbyCwilJydge^Sl^s - J in CivilSyit No. 25'-AGa301 fe set ^de. Orderof cliversion-datBd 31.3.1^9 ^ssed l^ fhe Sub Sivjsional Officer te directBd to be-teken on record. 6. Suftisjsafdtobe pendingsmee^ffll. CourtiaetowisdireGted todispose^f^B'tesuft^^eariyas^ossiblepisefeFablynokiaeyondsix months^mftedateofreceiptofcopyoflteorder.Needtesto say that due co-operation shaM^ae eBwedJ^ ttie paities •for eady disposalofsu'rt. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge \:-—