\4‘0 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 532 OF 2008 PETITIONER Shyam Lal Choudhry, Slo $hri Chakravarty Choudhry, aged about 57 years, Occupation Service on the post of Assistant Gram Panchayat Officer, in he office of Janpad Panchayat Basna. District Mahasamund (CG) Rlo Viilage Limgaon. Post Palkin, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund (CG). Versus State d Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Panchayat and Sonia! Weifare, D.K.S. Bhawan. Raipur, District Raipur (CG). District 2. Cotiector, Mahasamund, Mahasamund (CG). 3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Basna, Diskict Mahasamund (CG)- 4. Sarpanchcf Gram Panchayat Bhukel, District Mahasamund (CG). 5. Deputy Director, Panchayat, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (CG). (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Mdia) Singie Bench : Hon’ble Shri Sau'sh K. Agnihoti, J. Present : Shri Sunri Sahu, oounset for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sac, Govt. Advocate with Ms. sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for State. r ORAL ORDER (Passed on mis 8‘“ day of August. 2008) With the consent of teamed counset appearing for the pames, the petition is heard tinally. 2) Leamed counsei appearing for awe petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merits, at this stage. However, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before the concemed authorities within a period of three days and the same may be directed to be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within the prescribed time. V1) 3) Leamed counse' appearing for the State submits M if the representation is made, the same shall be considered and decided by the concemed authority, in accordance with iaw, on its ovm meriB, within a period of two weeks trom the date of receipt of the representation. 4) l hope and trust that the State Govemment strait examine the representation objectivety in accordance with law and guidelines, issued by the Govemment time to time. 5) tn view of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. 6) Consequently, interim order passed earlier stands discharged. Howevei, teamed counsel appearing for the state further submits that no coercive steps shalt be taken against the petitioner, tilt the disposal of the representation. I, Sd/— _ f Satish K. Agnihotri i ' Judge i