IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN THURSDAY, THE 5TH MARCH 2009 / 14TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(Crl.).No. 45 of 2009(S) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- RAJAN PILLAI, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, VETTUVELIL, RAJEEV BHAVANAM, AKKANATTUKARA, KALLUMALA, THAZHEKKARA, MAVELIKKARA TALUK. BY ADV. MR.M.R.SARIN MR.M.R.SASITH RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAVELIKKARA. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAVELIKKARA POLICE STATION, MAVELIKKARA. 3. SHOUKATH, AGED 46 YEARS, PALLITHEKETHIL, MATTUMKUZHI P.O., VETTIYOOR VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA. * ADDL. R4 : THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALLEPPEY (Suo motu impleaded as per order dated 18.2.2009 in W.P. (Crl.) 45/2009 and W.P.(Crl.) 60/2009) R1 AND R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. S.U. NAZAR R3 BY ADV. MR. RASHEED C. NOORANAD THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P. (Crl.) No. 45 of 2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXHIBIT P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE A. K. BASHEER & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P. (Crl.) No. 45 of 2009 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 5th day of March, 2009. JUDGMENT Basheer, J: When this petition came up for futher consideration today, learned Government Pleader submits that petitioner's son Rajesh had surrendered before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mavelikkara yesterday viz. 4.3.2009. The learned Magistrate has remanded the accused to judicial custody. 2. It is further submitted by the learned Government Pleader that Sri. Rajesh is arraigned as accused No.1. Apart from him there are three more accused in the crime, two of whom have already been apprehended. The other accused is still at large. Hectic efforts are being made to apprehend the remaining accused also. 3. In view of the above facts and circumstances, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. Therefore, the writ petition is closed. A.K. BASHEER, JUDGE P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE dkm.