c. :ra ^ •G'V ^vc Peci.'t.ioaeE' IKr 'EBE SXS&.WaSE Sfi' C5BBSBTa:S3&BB._<F®3BM*SBB,_,&T: ttsi.^: Bet.t'fefeiMt; .•^^'1^)4 toM awlda. Soa e>£ Siu-i S.P.Shalela* ^n^ ftged ai»at 40 yars, Head M»sfe®r»Qavte* Mlddle Scfeool, Taielyagara JBiwg. ©istr.lctBarg. ehfaatotj.sgarii. ifersus ^.:<^?%^" _ ^.^^^ ?.^^^ "..>"' ^6°'A •••• .-,s& &y" aesgQaiSwtfes 5:^a&«si"w»:i 1%'%A '^M-^^% '%C% ^i'^'. (1) St«t«a£ eiiI*attAsg«Kfa* tha>-a§^ Secretsry*^ , ' Settoet Sdacatioa Separtaeafc, Maia.traj.a.ya.» ,B.ICI.S..ttia*raa* ::Sa.lpu?* (2} Sefaoel Siaacatton ^4^'&esstaB B«da.,,%a^FBE'»,:,Ct&at;t.lsgw^. '^^3ftW :®isftiKi.et;Baueats.tea ]®iEf;i,cieE,^. 1 6^'" 1 XS_ 'ia'CE®«•a»BR- S2S_«S__g5^S 8 Xm.;«S.Xm^ XI-HC-22 311^1 ^T P;ii?n ^i\^\ sh^l^i •yfi-tl •TSf '^ffqi?fq, '^ftOTS, I^CTl^y 3TT^?r 'IR^? ;>A fllo > 2.S~6^/^c^^ •/•^ 200 '33 WTWI »)*<1<») fsF^V!' 26-8-2004 On a mention being made, this ea^e is taken up. Petitioner/s by Shd R. E.ryftiiffS-xjL, Aelyof-oCtt. State.by Shri V.V.S. Murthy, I|iy. Advocate General, with Shri Satish Gupta, D}'.GA, and SKri Akhil Agrawal and Sh^i Sandeep Dubey, Panel Lanyers. Heard. ~ '' ' ^ -" The matter relates to transfer ofttli Counsel for the petitioner/s submj effected illegally in contravention of law ^ State counsel submitted that th^ without sen'ina notice for demand ofjusti Having heard and considered t)ie rival contentions, without expressma any opinion on the merits of the case, in the| ser/e'd if a direction is given to the petil his/'her grievances and grounds befcre thi respondents along with a copy of the peti' under the law. shall consider and decide law as early as possible preferably within notice, the same be considered on its ovm Counsel for ihe petitioner.'s pravi any gnevance of the petitioner/s remain available under the law. It is open to the p law. With the aforesaid obsen'ations, t!(iis petition stands disposed of. ConsequentlyM.W.P., ifany, als thl^lfl'fl-i 'qTO?? 4 'fs'Zt rf5R?TC ^T sil^iH an^r peiitioner from the respective p'ace. .tted that the transfer ofthe petitioner/s has b>:en nd policy. Staie counsel opposed is. petitioner/'s has straightway filed the petition ;e and representation opinion of ;h;s Court, ends of justice Will be .onens to mai.:e detailed representation .'ais';na State Govemment.'competent authonh ot' the ion and this order. within 10 davs. and on such representation being filed, the Staie Govejrur.ent.'competent authonty of the respondcnis. the same on its own merits m accordance with six weeks frorn the date ofreceipt'prQdi.;CL.un of the representation. If any contravenljion of policy or guidelines is brought to the Inents. that after the decision ofthe represenmiion ir . he.'she ma\' be allowed to avail the remedv ititioner to avail the remedy available under ihe t stands disposed of. Certit'ied copy as per rules. Copy to State counsel for compliap.ee. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge la ss HI BB