HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR W.P.(S)No. 6744 of 2007 PETITIONER Rajesh Kumar Sahu, s/o late Bhagwan Prasad Sahu, aged about 22 years, r/o Jawalpur, via Baloda Distt. Janjgir Champa (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secrrtary, School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G). 2. District Education ofRcer, Janjgir Champa 3. Collector, District Janjgir Champa (C.6) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION Off INDJA———- Appearance: Shri Y. Kailash Rao, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, P.L. appears forthe State on advance copy. OFUU.ORDER^ (17.11.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard on admission. Learned counsel for the petftioner argues that father of the petitioner died in hamess, therefore, the petitioner was given compassionate appointment on the postof Shiksha Karmi, Grade-tlf, by order dated 02.6.2004 (Annexure P-1). He submits ttiat as an effect ofthe aforesaid appointment order, the peb'tioner is conUnuously working on the said post, but his services have not been ragularized so far. The petitioner has prayed for issuance of mandaraus to the respondents to convert petitioner's appointment from temporary appointment to regular appointment with retrospecfive effeet. A perusal of condition no.4 of the appoihtinent order would show that appointment of the petitioner on tfie post of Shiksha Karnri, G/acfe /// has been made subject to all service conditions whteh are made applicable in case of Shiksha Karmi. Needless to say that when such condition is already ttiere in the appointment order, the rules relating to service condittons of Shiksha Karkmi would automatically be made applicabte tothe case of the petitioner. According to such rules, at the appropriate flme, the petitioner shall be entitled for his regularization in aceordance with law. -t-- Learned counsel for the petiUoner could not polnt out violation of any rules which govern the service conditions of Shiksha Karmi. In the facts and circumstances of the case, 1 am not Inclined to admit this peb'tion for further hearing. The patition has no merit and the same is disposed of at the motion stage itself. However, it is made clear that this order will not come in the way of regularization of the petitioner if in usual terms he attains the status for regularization in his services. Sd/- Sunii KumarSinha Judge /