1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.149 OF 2006 Rameshwarnath Shivprasad Dube .. Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr.A.A.Garge and Mr.Ashutosh Gole for the petitioner. Mr.R.Y.Mirza A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 17TH JULY, 2006 DATED : 17TH JULY, 2006 DATED : 17TH JULY, 2006 P.C.: . Heard learned counse for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. By this revision application, the petitioner has impugned the order dated 21.12.2005 passed by the Sessions Court rejecting the application filed by the petitioner seeking discharge. I perused the order as also the FIR. It is clear from the FIR that the complainant was abused in the public place and in public view. The incident was witnessed by three witnesses which prima facie constitute an offence under the provisions of the Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Keeping that in view I find no infirmity in the order. The revision application is, accordingly, dismissed. 2 2 2 The trial Court shall decide the case on merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the observations made by the Sessions Court as also in this order. The revision is disposed of. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)