[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.741 OF 2007 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN.NO.232 OF 2007 IN C.R.NO.5 OF 2006 Geeta Gopal Haldankar ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.V.B.Ghorpade advocate for applicant Mr.Rajesh More A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : APRIL 3, 2007 DATE : APRIL 3, 2007 DATE : APRIL 3, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant who is the original complainant, is seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted by this Court to accused Sunil Laxman Patil. 3. The learned advocate for the applicant admits that the applicant is seeking cancellation of bail on the merits of the case. It is not the case of [-2-] the applicant that after being granted anticipatory bail, the accused has misused the liberty granted to him or that the Respondent has not complied with any of the conditions imposed on him. 4. Looking to the fact that the applicant is seeking cancellation of bail on merits, the only remedy open to the applicant is to challenge the said order before the Apex Court. 5. Application is disposed of. [Smt. V.K.Tahilramani, J.]