IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2011 OF 2007 THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA ... APPLICANT. VS. GANESH SUBHEDAR PISAL ... RESPONDENT MRS. S.D.SHINDE APP FOR THE APPLICANT- STATE. NONE FOR THE RESPONDENT. CORAM CORAM CORAM : Sri R.M.S.Khandeparkar : Sri R.M.S.Khandeparkar : Sri R.M.S.Khandeparkar and and and Sri Sri Sri A.A.SAYED,JJ. A.A.SAYED,JJ. A.A.SAYED,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : December 6, 2007. : December 6, 2007. : December 6, 2007. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant. None present for the respondent, though served. In fact, when the matter was called out on the earlier part of the day, it was kept back at the request of the junior of the Advocate for the respondent. However, in the second round of calling the matter at about 1.00 p.m. when the matter was called out, none appeared for the respondent. 2. Perusal of the impugned Judgment discloses that the Sessions Judge has not analysed the evidence on record in its proper perspective in the matter under consideration. Hence, leave to appeal is granted. Appeal stands admitted. 3. Action under Section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to follow. [R.M.S.Khandeparkar,J.] [R.M.S.Khandeparkar,J.] [R.M.S.Khandeparkar,J.] [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, J.] J.] J.]