IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6862 of 2011 MANJOOR MIAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 05.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. It appears from perusal of the record that Supaul P.S. Case No. 08 of 1989 was registered in the year, 1989 against the petitioner and some other co-accused persons. Furthermore, it appears that the petitioner was granted bail but subsequently, on 18.03.1993, his bail bonds was cancelled meaning thereby, he attended the court till the year, 1993. It would further appear that on 29.11.2010, he was produced before the court below by the police and since then, he is languishing in jail custody. Although it is a case of misuse of privilege of bail for near about 18 years, but submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner had gone outside the state in connection with his livelihood. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, I do not feel it proper to release the petitioner on bail, at least, at this stage. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected. It appears from perusal of the record that uptill now, the case of the petitioner is pending in the court of Sri R.P. Tiwary, J.M. Ist Class, Supaul and it has not been committed to - 2 - the court of sessions as yet. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Supaul should take effective steps to commit the case of the petitioner to the court of sessions in accordance with law. It is made clear that if the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within six months from today, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. Let the order be communicated to the court of Sri R.P. Tiwary, J.M. Ist Class, Supaul through fax at the cost of the petitioner. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)