IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4888 of 2009 Date of decision : 18.2.2010 Mulakh Raj Sharma ....Petitioner Versus Udham Singh ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Namit Gautam, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. H.S.Gill, Senior Advocate with Mr. R.B.Randhawa, Advocate for the respondent. S. D. ANAND, J. A plea raised by the petitioner herein (tenant before the learned Rent Controller) for amendment of application under Section 18-A of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act was negatived by the learned Rent Controller. It is apparent from the record that the learned Rent Controller had directed the respondent-landlord to indicate the particulars of the properties owned by and also sold by him and it was in pursuance of that order only that relevant particulars were placed on record by the respondent-landlord. It is then only that the petitioner tenant applied for the leave of the Controller to amend the pleadings to buttress a plea already taken in the course of the pleadings that the plea for ejectment suffers from the vice of malafides. As there is no controversy about these facts, the petition shall stand disposed of with a direction to the learned Rent Controller to dispose of the main petition itself with one year of the next date of hearing. The parties, through their learned counsel, are directed to appear before the learned Rent Controller on 2.3.2010. February 18, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE