CF0000114603 % 28E K32QK GG«mT oy JVD3iCA.TORE_OF CHHATTIS@lkRHlBIIASPUR ^T^^P<etitAo»e_No,^^^_/200lA s NenUc^and Ke»haawaiaJL» aged 48 years, 8/e» Megianafch Kedfewucwaai. Sirector of KAs&o Sarkart RJtee Nill & Vlpanan Swsififcy MaryadJlfc^ Bhatcia@a^ M@tt<» Ralis^ur^ V ERS U S t (1) Regi8trar» M«P»&e»G, Co-op^rafciv® Sociefcy* RaA]^3u?» Kalyaa Bfoawan, ft'fltWIiPo (2) Dy« a»gifltrar»(paidta9Q)» €3e^operatl^e Soclefcy» Ralpxir • (3) Secretary, Departnient of Co«op®ra~ tiw&» M»P»&C,G«, Raipur» KaXyan ai.a'wan* Ralpar* ' »4) Maiaa^(®Et (yradbaii^kaK;)» Kis&n Sarlcai?!. Rlo^ M:ill &. Vipanan Soc''Jtety Hseryadl.t, afaat@a®n» Mstt< Raipar. (5) J<R»RaJiaat»Rels^srniiEiQ ©fflcer (Tah&Udar, Blle.igaeh), Distt. Raipur^ vsfxa^Bas.^wsk W^B^K 22^/227 eoKftTiTOT^K oy i^Dia. mS^M^'^^^ES^. 28 »C»R8©f«%RT^SRAIm AHY ©^^; g^S'- ll^t Ay.&, NESQ^SSXRY OIR^T3EpN_t l.r '^•.-••^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARM : BILASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETITION N0.944 OF 2001 Nemichand Kesharwani RESPONDENTS Versus Registrar, M.P. & C.G. Co-operative Society & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri G.S. Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Veena Nair, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on this 3rd day of December, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that with the passage of time the petition has become infructuous, to which learned counsel appearing for the other side has no objection. In view of foregoing, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. _-^ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gowri