1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO.471 OF 2005 1) Ashok Madhavrao Alkhande, Age-50 years, Occu:Agriculture, 2) Sau. Ranjahabal alias Rajani Ashok Alkhande, Age-45 years, Occu:Household, Both R/o-Pimpalner, Tq-Sakri, Dist-Dhule. ...APPELLANTS. VERSUS 1) Dharamsing Gurubakshsing Punjabi Age-40 years, Occu:Truck Driver, R/o- Plot No.117, Bhairav Colony, Amer, Dist-Jaipur, 2) Rameshpal Chandrabhan Punjabi, Age-29 years, Occu:Truck owner, R/o-Gurgaon, Dist-Faridabad, 3) The Oriental Insurance Company, Ltd., Dhule. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.S.P. Brahme Advocate for Appellants. Appeal dismissed against Respondent Nos.1 and 2 by order dated 15th April, 2009. None present for Respondent No.3. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL, J. DATE : 19TH NOVEMBER, 2009. 2 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Appellant. The learned counsel for the Appellant submits that an amount of Rs.65,000/- was reduced by the Court on account of survival of another brother of the deceased, which is contrary to the established principles of grant of compensation. 2. The deceased was of 14 years of age who died in an accident on 10th September, 1999. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal considered the evidence on record and thereafter granted total claim of the Appellant amounting to Rs.80,000/-. The Appellant was paid Rs.50,000/- towards no fault liability. 3. I do not find any error in the view adopted by the Tribunal while passing the impugned order. From the endorsement made on the File, it is noticed that, by Court's order dated 15th April, 2009 Appeal came to be dismissed as against Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. 3 4. There is not merit in the Appeal. The Appeal stands dismissed. [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/NOV09/fa471.05