IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 7TH AUGUST 2008 / 16TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 27393 of 2005(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ P.V.RAGHAVAN NAIR, AGED 81 YEARS, NARAYANI NIVAS, PALAYAD.P.O., THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, FREEDOM FIGHTERS DIVISION, 1ST FLOOR, LOK NAYAK BHAVAN, NEW DELHI. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.V.E.ABDUL GAFOOR, ADDL.CGSC FOR R1 SMT.N.SUDHADEVI, G.P. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P(C).No. 27393/05. APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1. COPY OF THE NEWS ITEM IN MATHRUBHUMI DTD.17.10.42. P2. COPY OF THE ORDER DTD.30.11.98 BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR. P3. COPY OF THE application DTD.22.8.05 TO R2 WITH ADVANCE COPY TO R1. Sdk+ ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No.27393 of 2005 ================== Dated this the 7th day of August, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is stated to have filed Ext.P3 application before the respondents for pension under the Swathanthrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme. The petitioner seeks expeditious consideration of the same. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 3. The 2nd respondent shall consider Ext.P3 application submitted by the petitioner and take a decision as to whether the petitioner's case can be recommended to the 1st respondent for pension. The application along with the decision of the 2nd respondent shall be forwarded to the 1st respondent within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. On receipt of the same, the 1st respondent shall pass further orders thereon within a further period of two months therefrom. The petitioner shall produce appropriate documents to prove his claim, if not already produced, which shall be considered by the 2nd respondent. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2