WP 4239/11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4239/2011 Gajendra Vesta Valvi V/s The State & others. _______________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | Shri G.S. Rane, Advocate for petitioner. Shri K.M. Suryawanshi, AGP for respondent no.1. Shri P.S. Patil, Advocate for respondent nos.2 & 3. CORAM: D.B. BHOSALE & S.B. DESHMUKH, JJ. Date: 09.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged his termination order dated 1.3.2011 issued by respondent no.2 – Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nandurbar, on the ground that the petitioner did not submit caste validity certificate within the stipulated time. After the order of dismissal, the petitioner claims that he has obtained the caste validity certificate on 22.3.2011 i.e. WP 4239/11 2 within less than three weeks from the date of his termination. The petitioner further states that immediately thereafter, he made representation to the Block Development Officer on 23.3.2011 seeking his reinstatement. His representation was forwarded by the Block Development Officer to the Chief Executive Officer. Thereafter, the petitioner also submitted one representation directly to the Chief Executive Officer on 28.3.2011 (Exhibit F to the petition). Till this date, the Chief Executive Officer has not considered the petitioner’s representations. Learned counsel for respondent nos.2 & 3 submits that the Chief Executive Officer will consider the petitioner’s representations and pass appropriate order within a period of four weeks from today. His statement is recorded and accepted. We hope and trust that the Chief Executive Officer shall consider the petitioner’s representations sympathetically. WP 4239/11 3 With these observations, the petition is disposed of. It is needless to mention that till the petitioner’s representations are finally decided by the Chief Executive Officer, the post, on which the petitioner was appointed, shall not be filled in. (S.B. Deshmukh, J.) (D.B. Bhosale, J.) Dt/- 09.08.2011 ndk/c981114