IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-20057 of 2008 Date of decision : 28.11.2008 Vijay Kumar .....Petitioner Versus State of U.T., Chandigarh and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. N.K.Nagar, Advocate the petitioner. Mr. G.S.Chahal, Advocate for respondent No. 1. S. D. ANAND, J. The parties to the impugned prosecution have compounded the offence and have placed on record documented compromise which may be read as Annexure P-1. Petitioner Vijay Kumar son of Sh. Mulakh Raj son of Sai Dass and Respondent No. 2 Ms. Isha d/o Hari Ram Sanoria son of Ganda Ram, aged 35 years are present in the Court and are identified by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Both the parties own up the compounding. Learned counsel for the parties state that the allowance of the compounding of offences shall enable the parties to live in peace and harmony. In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.86 dated 20.2.2003 under Sections 406, 498-A IPC registered at Police Station, Sector 39, Chandigarh (Annexure P-2) shall stand quashed on account of compounding. Disposed of accordingly. November 28, 2008 (S.D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE