IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.6500-CI of 2011 and RFA No.2711 of 2011 Date of decision: 6.9.2011 Usha Rani and another ......Appellant(s) Versus The State of Haryana ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Surinder Singh, Advocate for the appellant(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral) There is a delay of 62 days in filing this appeal. In the application for condonation of delay, it has been averred that counsel representing the appellants before the Reference Court has not informed the appellants regarding the decision and because of the said reason, the delay has occurred. In the averments, name of the counsel representing the appellants before the Reference Court has not been mentioned. At the asking of the Court, learned counsel for the appellants has very fairly stated that he has not been informed by the appellants regarding the name of the counsel who was representing them before the Reference Court. It is unbelievable that the appellants will not even know the name of their counsel who was representing them before the Reference Court. Thus, explanation given by the appellants for condoning the delay cannot be accepted. It is well settled that no relief can be granted on a false plea. Since no sufficient cause has been shown to condone the delay, prayer for condonation of delay is rejected. Consequently, the appeal which is time barred is also dismissed. September 6, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE