1 ss1310-09 ttm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.1310 OF 2009 State Bank of India .. Plaintiffs Vs. Pragati Deepak Redkar and Anr. .. Defendants Mr.Amol Arote i/b M/s.Goenkar Law Associates for the plaintiffs CORAM : S.C.Dharmadhikari, J. DATE : December 3, 2010 P.C. : 1. This summary suit is based on written contract evidenced by the application made for education loan by defendant no.2 and he desired to obtain this facility for the education of his daughter who is defendant no.1. 2. It is stated that the sum lent and advanced is certain and the clauses of the agreement stipulate that the amount has to be repaid within the specified time. The account became irregular and therefore, demand notice dt.14.3.09 was issued which demand notice despite receipt by the defendants has not been responded. 2 ss1310-09 3. It is in these circumstances that the suit is filed and it is stated that the amount is crystallized under the statement of account which forms part of the accounts maintained during the ordinary and regular course of banking business. It is stated that the statement of account duly reflects the amount payable and which statement having been forwarded from time to time is not disputed. The defendant has been duly served and there is no appearance filed nor are any steps taken to defend the claim. 4. In these circumstances and when the defendant resides within the territorial jurisdiction of this court, the claim of the plaintiff is within limitation that I proceed to take the original documents on record. The original documents are taken on record and marked X for identification. Affidavit of service is marked X-1. There will be a decree as prayed. Advocate's cost be computed as per rules. Refund of court fee as per rules. ( S.C.Dharmadhikari, J. )