IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.R. No. 65 of 2009. Decided on: 17th December, 2010. Karnail Singh. …Petitioner. -Versus- Des Raj and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For respondent No. 1. : Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur and Mr. Harish K. Verma, Advocates. None for respondent No. 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Naresh Kaul, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition, in order to enable the petitioner to file an appeal before the 1st Appellate Court, as prescribed under the law. It is made clear that since the petitioner has been pursuing the remedy before this Court, the limitation will not come in his way, in view of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti, on usual terms. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge November 17, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.