IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 12TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 23RD MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 4639 of 2009(B) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- NOUSHAD, KANNIMOL THARAYIL HOUSE, ERAMATTOOR P.O., MANNAR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.J.DEVADANAM MR.VINOD J.DEV MR.PRAMOD J.DEV RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 3. ABDUL LATHEEF, KARANCHARIL HOUSE, ERAMATTOOR P.O., MANNAR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. MR.P.N.SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.4639 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 12th day of February, 2009 J U D G M E N T Ext.P1 is an application made by the petitioner for survey of his property and demarcation of its boundaries. According to the petitioner, though Ext.P1 has been made to the 2nd respondent, orders have not been passed. It is with this grievance, the writ petition is filed. 2. Having regard to the above facts, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1, if the same has been received and is pending. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months of production of a copy of this judgment, and the same shall be done only with notice to the 3rd respondent also. 3. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg