IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3674 of 2011 RANJIT SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 02/ 18.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that when the case of the petitioner was committed to the court of Sessions, he was represented by his lawyer under section 317(2) of the Cr. P.C. Subsequently, when the case record was received in the court of Sessions, the Sessions court issued summon and other processes to procure the attendance of the petitioner but he did not appear before the learned Sessions Judge. It appears from perusal of the impugned order as well as submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that no process was ever served upon the petitioner after commitment of the case. In view of the aforesaid submissions as well as facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner, Ranjit Singh, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge FTC No. II, Nawada in Sessions Trial no. 160A/2003 arising out of Rajauli P.S. Case no. 149 of 1995. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)