IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8450 of 2008 1. Sri Narain @ Sri Narain Yadav, son of Late Bachhu Gope, 2. Prabhat kumar, son of Sri Narain, both of village Rudauli, PS Bachwara, District Begusarai – petitioners. Vs. 1. The State of Bihar, 2. Kamal Paswan, son of Late Baldeo Paswan, village Dadupur, PS Bachwara, district Begusarai – opp. parties. 3 7.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This application has been filed for quashing the FIR of Bachwara PS Case No. 27/2007. Counsel for opposite party no.2 submits that the parties have compromised the matter. It appears that the FIR refers to allegations which indicate that counseling was to take place and the informant asked the accused persons to take up the counseling of certain candidates and there was an exchange of hot words. In this case I do not find that offences under the SC/ST Act are made out and in fact there is no offence made out under section 353 of the Penal Code. It was only a question of argument that took place between the parties and as such section 353 of the Penal Code does not apply in this case. Considering all aspect of the matter and the fact that the parties do not want to proceed in this case, in the interest of justice I quash the proceedings relating to Bachwara PS Case No. 27/2007 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai. This application is allowed. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)