IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE FRIDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2008 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 5768 of 2008(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, SINDHU BHAVAN, ANADIKKAL THEKKU, KODUMON, ADOOR. BY ADV. SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR SRI.BINDU SREEKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, KALLADA IRRIGATION PROJECT, KOTTARAKKARA. BY G.P. SRI.BASANTH BALAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 5768 of 2008 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of May , 2008 JUDGMENT The essential grievance voiced by the petitioner in this writ petition is that Ext.P1 order of the Lok Ayukta has not been implemented and his property, allegedly in wrongful possession of the third respondent, has not been returned to him in spite of Ext.P1. I am at a loss to understand how the petitioner can maintain a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for implementation/execution of Ext.P1 order issued by the Lok Ayukta. Moreover it is seen that the second respondent has filed a detailed statement. Annexure A produced along with that statement is a statement filed by the writ petitioner himself. In Annexure A, the writ petitioner agrees that pursuant to Ext.P1, measurement was conducted and the writ petitioner became convinced regarding the correctness of the properties actually possessed by him. The writ petition will stand dismissed.. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE dpk