IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18448 of 2010 KARU MEHTAR @ KARU RAUT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 26.05.2010. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, namely, Karu Mehtar @ Karu Raut who is in custody since 24.05.2009 in Muffasil (Munger) P.S. Case No.127 of 2009 under Section 392 and 411 I.P.C. Heard the learned A.P.P. also. According to the prosecution case, from the possession of co-accused persons, namely, Manoj Paswan, one motor cycle was recovered. He confessed before the Police. In his confessional statement, he named of other co-accused person, namely, Vikas Kumar Bharti and this petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is in custody since one year and nothing has been recovered from his possession. The co-accused Vikas Kumar Bharti has already been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No.43174 of 2009. On the other hand, the learned A.P.P. has objected the prayer for bail. Considering the nature of allegation against this petitioner and the fact that the co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court as stated above and also the period of detention, I direct that the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court below. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.) 2