1 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.288 OF 2007 Ispat Industries Ltd. ...Applicant. Vs. Machhimar Sangharsh Samiti & Ors. .. Respondents. ..... Ms. Sapna Richure i/b M/s T.N. Trpathi & Co., for the Applicant. Mr. Shreekant Gavand for Respondent Nos.1(1) to 1(5). ..... CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATE : 22 nd APRIL, 2010. P.C. 1. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties at some length, I am of the opinion that the Trial Court is in no error in refusing to reject the plaint. The ingredients of Order 7 Rule 11(d) are very clear. 2. The Court below has to consider the plaint averments which is relevant material at this stage. It has also adverted to the notification relied upon and has concluded at this prima facie stage that the suit is not barred. The Notification according to Trial Court, prima facie does not prohibit the activity undertaken by the original Plaintiff. This is just a prima facie opinion. It is recorded to hold that the plaint cannot be rejected as prayed. 3. For all these reasons, I am of the opinion that there is no error of jurisdiction nor this order suffers from material irregularity resulting in 2 manifest injustice so as to call for interference in this Court’s Revisional Jurisdiction. The Civil Revision Application is accordingly dismissed. No costs. (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)