hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2172 OF 2009 Javed Kadeer Shaikh & Anr. ... Petitioners Versus The Commissioner of Bombay Municipal Corporation and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. G.A. Tambe for Petitioners. Ms. Minakshi Surve i/by Mr. R.A. Thorat for R. No. 3. Ms. S.A. Module for R. Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.V. MORE, JJ. DATED : JUNE 17, 2010 P. C.: It is the case of the Petitioner that Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 have made some illegal construction. There is a building on the premises which is tenanted to Respondent Nos. 3 to 5. It appears that Petitioner seeks to redevelop the property and has not been able to arrive at settlement with the said Respondents. From the records, it appears that notice as issued to Respondent No. 3. According to learned counsel for Respondent No. 3 pursuant to the notice, the construction has been removed. It is denied by the Petitioner. Considering the above, the following order : It will be open to the Petitioners to make representation to the concerned Officer of the Corporation that the constructions have not been removed, whereupon the concerned officer to consider the case of the Petitioners and after hearing the say of Respondent No. 3 to 5 to pass appropriate orders according to law , at any rate not latter than four from from the Petitioners making representation. With the above observations, Petition disposed of. (R.V. MORE,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)