IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION(S) N0.1(o0^ OF 2011 PETITIONER: ^' ^•y^\ t'-K . ./i' ^^.^ '^.^ Ashok Kumar Sharma, Aged About- 42 Years, S/o- Late Shri Deenbaandhu Sharma, Occupation- Clerk, District Central Cooperative Bank, Rajanandgaon, R/o- Kawardha, P.S. Kawardha, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) •'n/- VERSUS RESPONDENT(S): 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Department Cooperative D.K.S. RaipurfC.G.) Secretary, of Societies, Bhawan, 2. Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Vivekanand Complex, Pension Bada, Raipur.tC.G.) 3. Chief Executive Officer, ^ Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Rajanandgaon, Head Office- G.E. Road, Rajanandgaon (C.G.) 4.Chairman, Jila Sahkari *" Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Rajanandgaon, Head Office- G.E. Road, Rajanandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . !si'c;"*£"<sia.. • •;I..-;^'. '"'% f)'/^% "^ :. %s':S. S "••••-ias^ jS f s .^' --s^, HICHH CCTBRr OP CHHATFI80ARH AT BUASPBR Dl^sloa Beach Hon1>le Shri I.M. €»uddnri& Hoa'ble Shri O. Mto«M|<nddln,•"- WRIT PBTITION (Sl HO. 1604 OP 2011 PBTITIONER ; Ashok Kumar Shauaa • Versiu RKSPOBDENT8 The State crf Chhattisgarb and ofhers. - - WRITPBTITIOK UHDBR AKTICUS 2M OF THB COI TITOION OF IHDIA Preseat: Shri Viaay Paadey, counsel with the pctitioner. Shri Vmay Harit, Depuly Advocate Qaierat &r Qvs State. Shri Ramakaat Pandey, couasel for uespoadent No. 3&4. ORALCMroKR (Passed on 29th ofAi^ust, 2011) Per I.M. Ouddasi. J. » By tbi^ writ petitioa fUed zinder articlc 226 of fhe Constitutfon oflndia; the pctitioncr has cItaUenged. the v^lidity of Rute 7 of the GhfaatUsgarh Ke Jlla Sahkad Keadrqfa Bante Karmachari SCwa (Nyojan, NJbaadfaan Tatha Unki Kaiya Sflufliq NfpaEt, 1982 (fbr short 'Nyam, 1982'). 2. Learaed couuscl for fhc petttioneT Iias sabautted that jf at fhe tune of ptomotioa,- any action te takea, exeixiislng the powers coaferred iu Rule 7, the petitiouer wffl get iriieparable loss. Therefore, he has faed this petitk»nbcfote eoasidei'atoa ofpromotion. - 3. Rule 7 ofthe Nfyara, 1982 has already becii struck dowa by fhis Coyrt InWrit Petition W.P.(S) No. 2133/2011 vidc ojBdcr dated 04-08-2011 holding that tfae same is not applfcabte ia fhe matter of appoiatuaent and promotion in t3ae respondent/Baak. Thus, the cause of actioa of fhfa wrtt yetitfon does uot szuvive wlth respect tochaDen^e ofRule 7 of fhe Niyam, 1982. However, the respondent/Baflk shaU tetee d action ti-eating fhat Rale 7 of Nfyam, 1982 is not appUGabte in ttie' matter of appoiutiaent and ptoaiotion iu .thc Respondent/Baak. 4. TUepetitfoaisdisposedofacooidJtogty. _„- Sd/- j Sd/- I.M.Quddusi i G. Judge j Judge Kvr