IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8718 of 2009 1. TATHAGAT EDUCATION MISSION, INDUSTRIAL TRAINING CENTER, NASRIGANJ, P.S. DIGHA, DISTRICT PATNA THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR KAUSHAL KUMAR, SON OF SRI HARISH CHANDRA GIRI, VIVEKANAND MARG, P.S. SRI KRISHNA PURI, DISTRICT PATNA. 2. KAUSHAL KUMAR, SON OF SRI HARISH CHANDRA GIRI, VIVEKANAND MARG, P.S. SRI KRISHNA PURI, DISTRICT PATNA-----PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LABOUR GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. THE SECRETARY NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR VOCATIONAL TRAINING NEW DELHI. 3. DIRECTOR GENERAL, EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 4. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF TRAINING, REGIONAL DIRECTORATE KOLKATTA 5. THE DIRECTOR, EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. -------RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02. 27.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Tathagat Education Mission, Industrial Training Center, Nasriganj, petitioner no.1 was recommended by the Standing Committee for grant of recognition to undertake course for vocational training in electrician, fitter and mechanical diesel trade to the National Council for Vocational Training, New Delhi, Respondent No.2 vide recommendation of the Standing Committee dated 30.10.2008, Annexure-2. In the light of the aforesaid recommendation petitioner no.1 institution was allowed recognition/affiliation for Electrician and Fitter trade and not for Mechanical Diesel trade as it appears from the grant dated 30.12.2008, Annexure-3. Close perusal of the remarks column of the said grant dated 30.12.2008, Annexure-3 would indicate that recognition for mechanical diesel trade has not been allowed as the trainees, tools and kits are not available in the institution and clarification has been sought for from the Regional Director, Kolkata. 3. Counsel for the petitioners submits that remarks entered in the remarks column appears to be incorrect in the light of the - 2 - recommendation of the Standing Committee dated 30.10.2008, Annexure-2 and with reference to the said recommendation it is submitted that the Deputy Director serving under the Regional Director is also a signatory to the recommendation of the Standing Committee, in the circumstances, any further clarification from the Regional Director does not appear to be necessary. 4. Let the petitioners file representation before the Secretary, National Council for Vocational Training, New Delhi, Respondent No.2 along with a copy of this order, who should consider the same in accordance with law as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of its receipt. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)