1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 758 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 758 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 758 OF 2006 R.V. Kamath ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra ... Respondents Mr. Rajeev K. Pandey i/by P.R.S. Legal for Petitioner. None for Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : APRIL 13, 2006 DATED : APRIL 13, 2006 DATED : APRIL 13, 2006 P.C. . Last time when the Petitioner bid was in August, 2003. His bid was not considered. There was a fresh advertisement in 2004. After that representation was made by the Petitioner through his lawyer. From the internal note of the office based on which the petitioner contends that his bid was accepted. . Exh. "N" is to the contrary. The Petitioner’s bid was not accepted and there was a fresh advertisement. There is no legal right in favour of the Petitioner. Hence, no interference is called for. Petition rejected. 2 (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)