IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9811 of 2010 1. MD. IBRAHIM @ MOTU S/O LATE SALIM 2. SABIR ALAM S/O JIYABUDDIN @ SIYABUDDIN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 21.04.2010 Heard both sides. Both the petitioners had earlier approached this Court for bail which was considered and rejected by order dated 13.07.2009 (Annexure-1). Having regard to the allegation they were granted liberty to renew prayer for bail after seven months if the trial in the meanwhile does not record adequate progress. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that although the trial has been taken up but till date only three witnesses have been examined, and they too have not supported the prosecution version. It is next submitted that petitioners are in custody since 10.03.2009. In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM, Kishanganj in connection with Kishanganj Rail P.S. Case no. 9 of 2009 (G.R. No. 22 of 2009, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioners. (ii) The petitioners shall appear in person 2 before the Court below on each date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the trial court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond(s) of the petitioners and secure their arrest in accordance with law. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)