Crl. Misc. No. M-25305 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-25305 of 2011 Date of Decision: November 11, 2011 Jaskaran Singh …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Vikram Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Kirat Singh Sidhu, DAG, Punjab. Mr.Deepinder Singh, Advocate for the complainant. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. Petitioner seeks the concession of regular bail in a case registered at the instance of complainant Jagmail Singh alleging that Iqbal Singh, Harjit Singh, Malkiat Singh, Daljit Singh, Hunny and petitioner had way-laid the complainant and his son. Non-petitioner Daljit Singh @ Lucky is alleged to have given a kirpan blow on the forehead of the son of complainant Harvinder Singh. Harjit Singh is alleged to have raised a Crl. Misc. No. M-25305 of 2011 [2] lalkara exhorting others to bring ammunition. Gurjot Singh @ Gora, son of Iqbal Singh had brought 32 bore pistol from the house alongwith petitioner who was armed with 12 bore gun. Iqbal Singh is alleged to have taken 32 bore pistol from his son Gurjot Singh and fired at the complainant party hitting Harvinder Singh in his stomach. Hunny son of Iqbal Singh is alleged to have given a gandasi blow on the right arm of Harvinder Singh. The petitioner is alleged to have fired with 12 bore weapon hitting the right flank of Ambardeep Singh whereas Malkiat Singh, non-petitioner is alleged to have given a dang blow on the complainant. Counsel for the complainant has submitted that the co-accused of the petitioner have been granted the concession of pre-arrest bail. It was vehemently argued that petitioner is alleged to have given a shot from 12 bore gun at PW Ambardeep Singh. The said injured was examined in the private hospital i.e. Ludhiana Medicity. Iqbal Singh, Gurjot Singh, Harjit Singh and petitioner have suffered various injuries. The petitioner has been in custody w.e.f. April 8, 2010. The authenticity of the medical evidence which is in the shape of record of a private hospital will be debatable. The other co-accused who have not been attributed any injury on the person of deceased have been granted the concession of bail. Taking into consideration the period of detention suffered by the petitioner, he could be granted the concession of bail. Without expression of any opinion on merits of the case, the petition is allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds/ surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Crl. Misc. No. M-25305 of 2011 [3] November 11, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE