THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1959 of 2010. Committee of Management, Boksa Janjati, Krishak Intermediate College and another. … Petitioners. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and another. …Respondents. Mr. Nirdesh Khandelwal, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. N.P.Sah, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Date November 20, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Interim Relief Application No. 9680 of 2010) By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to grant salary and benefits to the petitioners’ school from 3.3.2006 to 23.12.2006. In the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has urged that the ends of justice would be served if the petitioners are given liberty to make a fresh representation before the authority concerned and the authority concerned may be directed to decide the same within a time bound period. Prayer is innocuous. The petitioners are given liberty to make a representation afresh before the authority concerned. If such a representation is made, the authority concerned shall decide the same expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of filing of representation along with a certified copy of this order. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP