IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application(C482) No. 357 of 2010 Hardeep Singh S/o Baldev Kohli R/o House No. 2995, Sector 15 P.S. Sector 15 Chandigarh. ………..…Applicant. Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Home Secretary Dehradun. 2. Station Officer P.S. Shyampur R.K Kannojia, S.O. P.S. Shyampur District Haridwar. ..……Opposite parties. Shri Parikshit Saini, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Shri M.A. Khan,Brief Holder, present for the State. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of this petition, moved under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(for short Cr.P.C), the petitioner has sought the direction, that since the petitioner is already on bail in respect of crime No. 59 of 2006 relating to offence punishable under 2 section 60/72 of U.P. Excise Act, 1910, P.S. Shyampur, fresh bail bonds be accepted in respect of the sections 420, 468, 471 I.P.C. added in the charge sheet. 3. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the principle of law laid down in Hameeda vs. Rasheed (2008) 1SCC 474, this petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C. is summarily dismissed with the observation that if the petitioner Hardeep Singh surrenders before the court concerned, his bail application in respect of offences punishable under section 420, 468, 471 I.P.C. shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay, keeping in mind that he had already been released on bail in respect of offence punishable under section 60/72 of U.P. Excise Act, 1910. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt:27.04.2010 parul 3