:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3468 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO.3468 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO.3468 OF 2005 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (L) NO.1108 OF 2005 (L) NO.1108 OF 2005 (L) NO.1108 OF 2005 M/s.Frontier Civil Contractors (Delhi) Pvt.Ltd. ..Appellant Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corportion Ltd. ..Respondent None for the Appellant. Mr.Swapnil Bangal for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 19TH NOVEMBER,2007 : 19TH NOVEMBER,2007 : 19TH NOVEMBER,2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the Respondent. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 47 days delay in filing the above Appeal. Perused the Notice of Motion and affidavit-in-support thereof. There is no reply controverting the same. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay in filing the above Appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)