1 4803.11 Cri.Appln. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4803 OF 2011 ( Ramchandra Devidasrao (R.D.) Deshmukh V. The State of Maharashtra & oth. ) Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Shri. Ramchandra (R.D.) Deshmukh (Party in person) present Shri N.H. Borade, APP for the respondent / State ..... CORAM : U.D. SALVI, J. DATED : 24 th November, 2011. 1. Heard. Perused. 2. A Criminal complaint was lodged making allegation that there is deception and loss of reputation on account of the members of the “Janta Vikas Parishad” calling “Marathwada Mukti Din” acknowledged by the State as “Hyderabad Mukti Din”. Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Parbhani considered the accusations made in the complaint and the submissions made by the rival parties and ultimately came to conclusion that no offence conceivable under Indian Penal Code, 1860, is made 2 4803.11 Cri.Appln. out. A challenge to this conclusion in the Criminal Revision No. 106/2011 failed on merits. This fact is not in dispute. However, applicant has voiced that his sensibilities have been hurt for the reason of “Marathwada Mukti Din” being needlessly called as “Hyderabad Mukti Din”. 3. It is brought to his notice by the State, that State has duly acknowledged 17th September, as the day of liberation of Marathwada- Marathwada Mukti Din, vide notification dated 27-03-1998, Considering this fact, the applicant does not pursue this application and wants to put an end to the controversy. 4. The applicant is permitted to withdraw the application, with no order as to costs. . Criminal Application No. 4803/11 stands disposed off accordingly. ( U.D. SALVI, J. ) SDM*