IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 9262 of 2007 Between: G. Aswani Kumar, S/o. Srinivasa Rao, R/o. Dr. No.18-2-5, Syed Khan Street, Guntur, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Municipal Corporation of guntur, rep., by its Commissioner, Guntur, Guntur District. 2 The Municipal Health Officer, Municipal Corporation of Guntur. 3 The Municipal Engineer, Municipal Corporation of Guntur, Guntur, Guntur Dist. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner's application dt. 29.3.2007 in accordance with rule 11(2)(vi) of the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad Tender Rules 1970 at the time finalization of Tenders as illegal, improper, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents herein to allot atleast 15% of the works to the petitioner and other eligible persons like the petitioner ( as per rule 11 (2) (vi) of the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad Tender Rules 1970 on nomination basis and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MRS.SUJATHA V. Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No. 9262 of 2007 Order: In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction for issuance of tender schedules, pursuant to the tender notice issued by the Commissioner, Guntur Municipal Corporation. When the matter is taken up for admission, none appears for the petitioner nor is there any representation made on his behalf. However, a perusal of the tender notice indicates that the said notice was issued notifying certain sanitation works for the year 2007-08. In view of the fact that the very period of contract itself is already over and as there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. Date: 27.04.2009 Nsr