"3> C^i^7 IN THS SSON'BLB SSIGH COURT OF CHHATTZSGARH JUDSCATURB AT BJLASPUR W.P. / 8} No. ^^ /2011 PBTITIONBR: ^' .Si alrff& //;"^'U.~^3T' <i;^ •^Dr. Pyare Lal Thakur S/o Shri I^uram. Thakur Aged about 34 years Occupation -Assistant Veterinary Surgeon Veterinary Hospital Sanna Dist-Jashpur (C.G.) RBSPONDENTS: ^^ VBRSUS ^.State of Chhattisgarh Through, Secretary , Department of Veterinary Development Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G-) 2. Collector ,Jashpur District Bastar (C.G) 3. Deputy Director , Veterinary Services, Jashpur , District - Bastar ( C.G.) ^Ki^ Y WRIT PBTIT10N UNDER ARTZCLE 226/227 OF TSE^CONSTXTUTfQN QF JWDZA a»i! BiK: ^ HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR WRFT PETmON (-S) No. 965 of2011 ^ PETITIONER : Dr. Pyare Lal Thakur. VERSU8 RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WK!T PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Aanilwtri* J. Present: Ms. Deepali Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyerfortfae State/respondents. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 18th day of Febroary, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for tfae petitioner suhmits Ihat vide order dated 04.10.2010 (Annexure P/l), the petitioner,woricmg as Assistant Veterinary Surgeon at Veterinary Hospital, Sarma, Disfrict Jashpur, has been transferred to Veterinary Hospital, Vishrampur, District Bastar. However, the pelitioner has not yet been relieved tojoin the new place ofposting. Ms. Pandey submits that once the order of transfer has been passed, it is for the govemment to ensure that it is complied with immediately. She relies on a decision of the Supreme Court in Sreedam Chandra Ghosh v. State ofAssam & otlier^, in support of her contention that if'the order is not complied with, a direction ean be issued fbr enforcement thereof. 2. Shri Roy, leamed ' Panel Lawyer appearmg for the State/respondents submits that that if the transfer order dated 04.10.2010 (Annexure P/l) is still in existence and has not been complied witfa, appropriate steps would be taken to comply with the order. 3. Ifflie aforesaid transfer order is still in existence, Ifae govemment is under an obligation to comply with the same at once. It is aceordingly directed that the transfer order shall be complied with forthwith, within a period oftwo weeks. 4. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. Satts^^.^ I n judg' (1996)103ce567