THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2122 OF 2009 ORDER: Heard both the sides. The petitioner filed this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, assailing the order dated 16.04.2009 in I.A.No.223 of 2009 in O.S.No.240 of 2005 on the file of the Family Court-cum-Additional District Judge, Guntur, in rejecting the application filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to permit the petitioner to file additional written statement with regard to the voucher mentioned in the affidavit. The suit is one for recovery of money under a promissory note. The trial has commenced and the matter was coming up for arguments. In the mean time, several applications were filed for reopening, for raising attachment and to receive certified copies of registered sales etc., and the same were pending consideration. At this stage, the present application is filed. However, the Court below did not find favour to receive the same on the ground that it was filed at a belated stage. Hence, the revision. Having considered the submissions made and on perusal of the material available on record, it is seen that the suit being one for recovery of money under a promissory note and already a mention was made with regard to the voucher in the affidavit, no prejudice would be caused if the present I.A. were allowed, as there is be no change of circumstances. It is even submitted that no further evidence is necessary to adduce. In the circumstances, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and consequently, I.A.No.223 of 2009 also stands allowed. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 18th June 2010 RRB