IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18670 of 2009 1. BIJAY BAHADUR SINGH S/O LATE AMBIKA PRASAD SINGH R/O VILL- SIYAMAK, P.S. NOKHA, DISTT. ROHTAS, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT PREMCHAND ROAD, MOH- GAURAKSHNI, SASARAM, P.O. & P.S. SASARAM, DISTT. ROHTAS 2. TEJ BAHADUR SINGH S/O LATE AMBIKA PRASAD SINGH R/O VILL- SIYAMAK, P.S. NOKHA, DISTT. ROHTAS, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT PREMCHAND ROAD, MOH- GAURAKSHNI, SASARAM, P.O. & P.S. SASARAM, DISTT. ROHTAS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COLLECTOR DISTT. ROHTAS AT SASARAM 3. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND REFORMS null SASARAM, DISTT. ROHTAS 4. CIRCLE OFFICE SASARAM 5. VIJAYA LAXMI DEVI @ USHA W/O ARBIND KUMAR SINGH AND D/O LATE ABHAY BAHADUR SINGH R/O VILL- PARAURA, P.O. & P.S. SYED RAJA, DISTT. VARANASI, U.P. AT PRESENT RESIDING AT PREMCHAND PATH, MOH- GAURAKSHNI (SIYAMAK HOUSE), SASARAM, P.O. & P.S. SASARAM, DISTT. ROHTAS 03/ 12.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State of Bihar as also perused the mutation order, passed by the Circle Officer, appellate order, passed by the DCLR and the revisional order passed by the Collector, Sasaram whereunder 03 decimals of land has been mutated in favour of private Respondent no.5 in view of the contents of the sale deed, Annexure-1. I do not see any illegality in the three orders dated 19.7.2003, 13.3.2004 and 4.3.2007, Annexures-3,4 and 5 to this application. This writ application is, accordingly, dismissed. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha,J.)