IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 443 OF 2009 (MS) Anand Singh and others. …………..Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ………Respondents. Mr. K.N. Joshi, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand. 18th November, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. K.N. Joshi, Advocate for petitioners and Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand. In this writ petition, an advertisement pertaining to the year, 2001 has been challenged by the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners Mr. K.N. Joshi states that since the matter pertains to the year, 2001, the writ petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 18.11.2009 Rathour