IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO : 956 of 2001 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 03/04/2001 in WP NO : 7180 OF 1998 on the file of the High Court.) Between: The Vice-Chairman Hyderaba Urban Development Authority, Hyderaba A.P. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 R.Sivanada Reddy son of R.Narayana Plot No.113-a, Jubilee Hills Hyderabad 2 R.Rohini, w/o R.S.Reddy Plot No.1113-A, Jubilee Hills Hyderabad 3 R.Amarnath son of R.S. Reddy Plot No.1113-A, Jubilee Hills Hyderabad 4 R.Srikanth, son of R.S.Reddy Plot No.1113-A, Jubilee Hills Hyderabad 5 Kum.K.Sowjanay, D/o K.V.Subba Reddy Plot No.1113-A, Jubilee Hills Hyderabad 6 Kum.R.Swathi (Minor) D/o R.Sivananda Reddy Plot No.1113-A, Jubilee Hills Hyderabad. 7 O.Saraswathi w/o O.G. Reddy Plot No.1113-A, Jubilee Hills Hyderabad. 8 O.Gopala Reddy, s/o. O.Subbaram Reddy R/o Sundarnagar, Near Erragadda, Hyderabad. 9 Secretary to Revenue Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Department , Secretariat Building, Hyderabad. 10 The Special Officer Competent Authority Urban Land Ceilings, Chandra vihar Building Nampally, Hyderabad 11 The District Registrar, Ranga Reddy Dist., Panjagutta, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.S.SATYAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondents 1to 8 : MR.S.SRINIVAS REDDY Counsel for the Respondents 9: G.P. for Revenue Counsel for the Respondent No.10: G.P. for Land Ceiling Counsel for the Respondent No.11: None The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL No : 956 of 2001 ORAL JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) Smt. K.V. Rajasree, learned counsel representing Sri S. Satyam Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has become infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. ___________________ T. MEENA KUMARI,J DATE: 21st August, 2008 __________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J pnb