IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 29TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 7TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 24155 of 2011(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- ALLEPPY DISTRICT EX-SERVICEMEN L.C CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO.A.862, SANKARAMANGALAM, THAMALLAKKAL.P.O., HARIPPAD, ALLEPPEY-690 549, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.R.SUDHEESHKUMAR SRI.SUNIL KUMAR A.G RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, HEAD OFFICE, ALAPPUZHA-688 001, REP.BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER. 2. M/S.EXMOS SECURITY SERVICE, REGD.NO.190/90, VAYALAR.P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA-688 536. ADV. SRI.P.K.VIJAYAMOHANAN FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.24155/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PAPER PUBLICATION DATED 24/06/2011. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE TENDER CONDITION ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE TENDER QUOTATION DATED 09/07/2011. EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 26/07/2011. EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 12/08/2011. EXHIBIT P6: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 17/08/2011. EXHIBIT P7: TRUE COPY OF THE G.O. DATED 02/05/2011. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 24155 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 29th day of September, 2011 J U D G M E N T 1st respondent invited Ext.P1 tender for appointment of security guards. It appears that the petitioner and the 2nd respondent submitted tenders. Thereafter, this writ petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging that contract has been awarded to the 2nd respondent and that the 2nd respondent does not satisfy the tender conditions and therefore is ineligible. 2. A statement has been filed, which show that if the tender conditions are applied, the petitioner itself is ineligible for the reason that it does not have registration with the Director General of Resettlement, Government of India. Therefore, the petitioner being an ineligible tenderer, even if the writ petition is entertained, petitioner is not going to be benefitted in any manner. Therefore, I do not think it necessary to entertain the writ petition. Writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp