1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6463/2010. (The Chief Executive Officer, ZP, Osmanabad and Anr. Vs. Munaf Shaikh and Anr.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.MP Tripathi, Adv. h/for Mr. KJ Ghute-Patil, Adv. for petitioners; *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 28 th October, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) Ad hoc District Judge-1, Osmanabad in MCA No.1/2006, recorded the following order : “ The appeal stands allowed. The order of rejection of application Exh.5 stands set aside. The application Exh.5 stands allowed. The defendants are restrained from causing interference in the possession of the plaintiffs over the suit property by issuing an order of temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 of the C.P.C., pending hearing of the suit. The defendants are directed to pay the costs to the plaintiff and bear 2 their own.” 3) Since the order itself specifies that it has to operate till pendency of the suit, learned counsel for the petitioner informs, the suit itself is disposed of on 7th September, 2007, indeed prior to the order dated 16.09.2008. However, it appears the said order was not brought to the notice of the learned Adhoc District Judge-1, Osmanabad. Consequently, the order will have no effect to operate. 4) With this observation, writ petition disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/