IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6385 of 2010 RAKESH KUMAR S/O SRI RAJ NARAYAN SINGH PROPRIETOR M/S MAA SONA FILMS ,103 GAGAN APARTMENT EXHIBITION ROAD, PATNA. VERSUS 1. THE UNION OF INDIA , THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS DELHI 2. REGIONAL DIRECTOR EASTERN REGION , MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS KOLKATA 3. REGISTRAR COMPANIES 4TH FLOOR 'A'WING, MAURYA LOK COMPLEX, DAK BUNGLOW ROAD, PATNA-01 4. CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT B. GUPTA AND CO. 4TH FLOOR, SWIKIRTI APARTMENT , S.P. VERMA ROAD, PATNA 5. BIHAR & JHARKHAND MOTION PICTURE ASSOCIATION HARIOM COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, NEW DAK BUNGLOW ROAD, PATNA ----------- 02 13.04.2010 The writ petitioner being in motion picture trade complains against the conduct of the Bihar and Jharkhand Motion Picture Association. He says that he had complained to Company Law Board but no action is being taken. As to the nature of complain, learned counsel points out that the Motion Picture Association has power to act as an arbitrator in regard to trade disputes. While so doing, it acts arbitrarily directly affecting the rights of such traders adversely, which is a serious threat to petitioner’s right to carry on his trade. In my view, the submission is misconceived. If in any arbitral proceedings the arbitrator misconducts himself or the award is passed inappropriately violating law or otherwise petitioner has his statutory remedies, as provided under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, for which neither a complain would lie to the Company Law Board nor a writ petition would lie - 2 - to this Court. A specific statutory remedy having been provided, the petitioner must avail the same, failing which he cannot be heard in any other Forum. This application is misconceived and is dismissed as such. Trivedi (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)