1 Cri.A.2425.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2425 OF 2011 Ramesh Trimbak Hamane R/o Ahmedpur, Dist. Latur. ...APPLICANT. VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra, ...RESPONDENT. ... Shri. Y.V.Kakade,Advocate for Applicant. Shri. G.R.Ingole, A.P.P. for Respondent. ... CORAM: T.V.NALAWADE, J. DATE : 4TH JULY, 2011. PER COURT : 1. This application is filed for anticipatory bail, in Crime No. 84 of 2011, registered with Ahmedpur Police Station for the offences punishable under sections 306,498-A,504 and 506 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Papers of investigation are made available by the APP. Both sides are heard. 2. A Crime is registered on the basis of report given by the father of the deceased. He has contended that the deceased was given in marriage to 2 Cri.A.2425.11 applicant prior to 12 years, of the date of incident. She could not conceive even after 12 years cohabitation with applicant. It is case of the complainant that as she did not conceive, there was ill treatment by the present applicant to the deceased. On 20.05.2011 at about 9.30 a. m. present applicant informed to father-in-law that the deceased had gone towards Sangvi Phata on foot and he should come to village. Therefore, complainant sent his son Nanganth to search the deceased, till then she committed suicide by jumping in Mansad river. 4. Papers of investigation include statements of neighbours and they show that neigbourers are not supporting the allegations of ill-treatment. For about 5/6 years there was ill-treatment to the deceased, as she could not conceived. Statement of Nagnath shows that he had gone to village Ahemdpur, present applicant and he himself had searched for deceased and then brother of deceased had informed that dead body of deceased was found in the river Mansad. The applicant has produced the Medical papers to show that treatment was given to the deceased. It also shows that she was shown to neurologist. It was submitted that due to infertility the deceased was also suffering from fits and there was no fault on the part of present applicant. It was submitted that present applicant is serving in MSRTC and the allegations are of such nature that police should not need 3 Cri.A.2425.11 of custodial interrogation. 5. The circumstance that when the deceased left matrimonial house in the morning, present applicant was present in the house, but he just allowed the deceased to leave matrimonial house and then he informed the father of the deceased that deceased had left matrimonial house is against the applicant. In view of this fact, discretionary relief cannot be given to him. So, application stands rejected. Interim relief stands vacated. No further interim relief. Sd/- [ T.V.NALAWADE, J.] MTK