IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 18356 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION: October 23, 2008 M/s Shiv Fruit Agency Indri, District Karnal …Petitioner Versus Chief Administrator and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: Mr. Maharaj Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. The writ petition does not disclose any statutory rules requiring the petitioner to have transacted business as a Kacha Arhtia for the period of four years with a further condition of deposit at least Rs. 5,000/- market fee annually. Even otherwise the averments made in the petition shows that the petitioner has paid the market fee for the last two years, amounting to Rs. 10,898/-. The break up of the market fee has not been given. C.W.P. No. 18356 of 2008 Faced with the aforementioned position, learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action after incorporating all the relevant rules, averments along with necessary documents. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforementioned. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (JORA SINGH) October 23, 2008 JUDGE Pkapoor 2