:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY T AMD I JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 45 OF 2005 IN PETITION NO. 785 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO. 52 OF 2004 Vivek Vasant Velinkar and Anr. ...Petitioner /Plffs. vs. Omprakash Durgaprasad D. Sharma .Respondent/ Caveator A L O N G W I T H CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 46 OF 2005 IN PETITION NO. 787 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO. 53 OF 2004 Vivek Vasant Velinkar and Anr. ...Petitioner /Plffs. vs. Omprakash Durgaprasad D. Sharma .Respondent/ Caveator Mrs. M.S. Diwan i/b. Shah and Sanghvi for the petitioner. M.P. Shukla for the respondent. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 8TH JULY, 2005. :2: P.C. : 1. Admittedly the caveator has no caveatable interest and he is merely the tenant inrespect of one of the tenaments of the said properties. In view of the aforesaid chamber summons made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). sd/- *********