HIGHeOURTOFCHHATTISGARH^TBnj^SPlM W. P. No. 6137of 2005 Petitioner Responctente Vereus- 1. 3. --A Komal Dawangan, S/o. Shri Bhaiya Ram Dowangan, Aged about 18 years, OccupaBon Stydent, Thr®u9hGuardian Pa ®r atyaramDewrangan,S/o. Late Da^ram Dewangan, ^ed abput 50 years, R/o Viltege Bhra, P^. Jaijaipur, Tahsjl Ghampa, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) State cf ChhatUsgarh, Through - the Secretary, Schobt Edu^tton De^rttnent, D.K.S. Bhawan, MantTalaya,t^upyr Chhaffisgarh Board of SecMHtery Edurafion, Raipur, Thirough tt Secretary, Pension Bada, Raipur. The Chainnan, C^3. Boart of Seeonctoiy Education, pensfon Bada. Raipur(C.G.) Tlie Certer Inchaige of Examinaton, SaraswEfi Shlshu Mandlr, l-lighesrSecQnclarySchQbl, Birra, Tah^l Champa, Dislrict Jar^ir-ehampa (C.G.) Ths Center IndWge of VahNion (Unknown) Throi(gh C.G. Boanl<rf Secondary Eduratton, Pen»wi Bada,Raipur(C^) The gicaminatipn Centar tncharge, C.G. Board of SecomiBy Edu(^ion,RaipuT(C^3.) Th8 rrincipal, Saraswati Shishu Mandir, Hlgher Se@Qn<feuy School, Birra, Tahsll Ctiampa, Distt. Jaiygv-Chsmpa (C.G.) WRTT PETmONUNDERARTICLE 226/227 OT THE CONSTrrUTiONOFlNDIA SB: Hon'bte Shri Safish K. AgnJhotri.J. 5. 6. 7. Shri fishok Kumar Shukla, Adyas^e for the petffioner. ?p ShriS. K.;Mishra,PanelLawyerfoFtier^ponctentNo.1®tate; Shri H. B.IAgarwal.Senior AGlvocatewtthMs.SangeetocMishrd, Advocate for theirespcndentsNo. 2,3,5 and6. ^^^1 ^c^^^ / t Thakur ORDER (Passed on this 26* day of Ortober, 2(»7) 1. Learned counsel appearing for ttie peBUoner submlts that the t •• . • •• '. answer sheetcrf thep^itioner insubject-physics ofclass 12* of Uie Higher Secondary School Certificate Examination <10+2) 2005. conducted by the ChhatBsgarh Board of Secondaiy Education, Raipur(forshort 'ttie Board') has been changed. 2. The rsspondent/Board tias produced ttie answsr sheet. On perusal 1 do notfind any change in the answer sheet. 3. Learned counsel appearing for ttie petiSoner submite that there is change infte writing in some pages ofthe answer sheets, which is not the handwriting of the petitioner. Thfe cannot be examined by this Court under writ jurisdlcUon, as this is the question of fticts. However, the petifionerinay make a representation to ttie 1'..' . ' • •• ' • authoriBes concemed raising his grievance, in tum the respondenVBoard may examine the pass appropriate order, in accordance with law. 4. tn view of th.e foregoing this peffiion stands disposed of. No order astocosts. __—-—-~\ Sd/- ' . ; SatisIiK. AgniUbtri Judge i^sf^^gg^^is^!^^^^.;^ S^^iS^^^^^i^-^MSfiE