Crl. Misc. No. M-35005 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-35005 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 30.11.2010 Dalip Singh ...Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Malkeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Rajan Gupta, J. (oral) The petitioner has preferred the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking registration of FIR in view of complaint Annexure P-1 made by him before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the allegations levelled in the complaint, Annexure P-1, cognizable offence is made out and thus a direction is required to be issued by this court for registration of an FIR. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and given careful thought to the facts of the case. A perusal of complaint Annexure P-1 shows that the petitioner has levelled certain allegations in the same against respondents No.4 to 9. There is reference therein to some civil dispute also, pending between the parties. I am of the considered view that no Crl. Misc. No. M-35005 of 2010 2 direction need be issued by this court in inherent jurisdiction of this court for registration of the FIR. In view of the law laid down by the apex court in Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P. & others, 2008 (1) R.C.R. 392, an effective remedy by way of complainant under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. is available to the petitioner. The petition is, thus, devoid of merit. The same is hereby dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 30.11.2010 'rajpal'