1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICAION NO. 1047 OF 2007 (Transfer) Madhav Maroti Barapatre & 11 Ors. Vs. Ashok Haribhau Shrugarpawar & 14 Ors. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri A. R. Wagh Adv for petitioner. Shri Kavimandan Adv for respondents. CORAM: C. L. PANGARKAR J. DATED: 17 th NOVEMBER, 2009. Heard counsel for the petitioners and the respondents. This application has been filed for transfer of Civil Suit from Sindhewahi district Chandrapur to Paoni district Bhandara. Main grievance upon which transfer of the suit is based which is for partition and separate possession is sought, is that large property out of the suit property is situated in 2 Bhandara district. It is also contended that it is convenient for some of the applicants herein to appear before the Court at Paoni rather than at Sindhewahi. Appearing at Sindhewahi is too much inconvenient. No reply has been filed by the respondents. I have heard the learned counsel for the applicants and the non applicants. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that large property is situated in Bhandara, and a very small portion of property is situated within the jurisdiction of Sindhewahi. He submits that it would be convenient to appear at Paoni in Bhandara district. This is the only ground which is urged. This can hardly be a ground for transfer of suit from one district to other district. There is no substance in the application. The same is rejected. JUDGE 3 svk