1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR : O R D E R : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1453/2009. (Lichman Ram & Another Vs. Mst. Rukma Bai & Others) DATE OF ORDER : March 05, 2009. P R E S E N T HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS ____________________________________ Mr. Mahesh Thanvi for the petitioner. Mr. T.S. Champawat for the private respondents. Mr. Sandeep Bhandawat, Government Counsel. BY THE COURT : Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. In this case, the petitioner is challenging the validity of the judgment and decree passed by the Assistant Collector & S.D.O., Merta in Revenue Case No.57/1964, decided on 25.08.1978, judgment dated 20.03.2003 of the Revenue Appellate Authority, Nagore rendered in Revenue Appeal No.71/96 and, so also, judgment dated 23.01.2009 of the Board of Revenue in the second appeal affirming the finding arrived at by the Courts below. I have carefully perused the impugned orders/judgments rendered by the Courts below. In my 2 opinion, the concurrent finding of the Courts below does not require to be interfered with in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The judgment in the suit filed in the year 1964 attained finality after the judgment dated 23.01.2009 rendered by the Board of Revenue. Hence, at this stage, no interference is required in the concurrent findings of all the Courts below. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. There shall however be no order as to costs. (Gopal Krishan Vyas) J. Ojha, a.