@ Shale Bench IN THE HON'BLE HIGH ecum- OF CHHATTIseARH AT BILAsPUR (cg w.P. (s) No. M1§9> OF 2011 r PETITIONER i Jiwesh Singh Thakur, aged abou’r 19 year's, S/o Late Bhofa Singh Thakur‘, R/o Village Kimri, Tahsil Mas’rur‘i, Dis’rf. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS REsPONDENTs :1. ”smug of chhamsgarh Through Secretary, Heal’rh Depar’rmem‘, D.K.S. Bhawcm, Man‘rmlaya, Raipur (6.6.) 2. Direc’ror Rajya Ayurvedic Office, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Dis‘h‘icf Ayurvedic Officer, Bilaspur‘ (C.G.) 4. ‘ The Collec‘ror, Bilaspur‘ (6.6.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA PARTICULAQS OF THE PETITIONER As menfioned in fhe cau5e fffle. WWWW ti 9cm N. Aux u WW mam (Wu) WWW 3211mm mmm WWW f3€rW aqaimm ’RITINKER DXWAKER iounsel for the petitioner. the State. 2r in the present petition is that hakur was an employee of the ;ervice on 25.11.01. for the peu'tioner, at the time of minor and therefore he could .tment however, alter attaining ade representation to the resp. has not been considered for {e submits that the purpose of ved if direction is issued to the tending representation of the $3.: HON’ELE MR. JUSTICE l 03.98.201 1 Shri Ramakant Pandev, c Shn' N.Naha Roy, P.L. for Gn'cvance of the petitiom his father late Bhola Singh T resp. NO. 1 and he died during : Accqg‘ding to the counsel the death of his father, he was not get compassionate appoit the age of majority he has m No.3 but tin date his case compassionate appointment. I- wg this petition would be se1 resp. No.3 to decide the I petitioner expeditiously. Accordingly, the petition the resp. No.3 to decide the petitioner, if already not deci( expeditiously as possible pref months. It is made clear that thi Ls disposed of with a direction to pending representation of the led in accordance with law as erably Within a period of four s Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge