IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.14393-M of 2010 Date of Decision:10.2.2011 Ms. Rani and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Sushil Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sidharth Sarup, D.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for issuance of directions to the official respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent No.4. Upon notice, reply of Ravinder, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ganaur, on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 has been filed. It is submitted in para (i) of the preliminary submission as under: “That after receipt of copy of petition and order dated 17.5.2010 passed by the Hon'ble High Court, Sh. Satbir Singh, ASI alongwith HC Sunil visited village Shekpura, District Sonipat where both the petitioners found present in the village at the given address. Both the petitioners told that they are living in village Shekpura District Sonipat as husband and wife. They further told that there is no danger Crl. M. No.14393-M of 2010 -2- to their life and liberty in village Shekpura, District Sonipat. Both the petitioners also told that they have performed their marriage at Delhi. Both these petitioners also told that they are major.” In view of the above, no further order or direction is required to be passed. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 10.2.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE