y, ^^^^^^^s^^^^^^^^s^^^^^^^^ IN TH_E HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.} WRIT PETmON N0. •^l^/2004 DATE OF PRESENTATION : 27.10.2004 PETITIONERS 1 ORIGINAL DEFENDANTS 1 C^-:-: ^yy f^p^ ;-":^-">^' i\^ ^' Ay > y' ..^."->~ ^r ^^. ^•••"" .... ,^€ ^^ Nazeer Mohd, aged about 50 years,^. son of Noor Mohd, caste Musalman, resident of Marimai Road, Magarpara, Bilaspur, Tah and Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Smt Kamrunisha, aged about 60 years, wife of Seikh Nazeer, and daughter of Late Npor Mohd, caste - Musalman resident of - in front of house of Ramgopal Tiwari's gully, Mumharpara, Juna Bilaspur, Tah and Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Smt Jaibenisha, wife of Seikh Ibrahim, aged about 65 years, and daughter of Noor Mohd, caste- Musalman, resident of Marimai Road, In front of Atiyana Tent House, Magarpara, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF 4.^0.^^ i "'i^ "-frf"i'^V )• i?-^3_ l. ,:!SK' \'^r . -'S31"T: Basheer Mohd., aged about 70 years, son of Noor Mohd, caste - Musalmaan, resident of Dadhi, Tah. Bemetara, Distt. Durg (CG) Nagar Palik Nigam, through : the Commissioner / Mayor, Nagar Nigam, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) (ORIGINAL DEFENDANT) The State of Chhattisgarh, through : the District Collector, Bilaspur (CG) (ORIGINAL DEFENDANT1 I:" I'o l^ Id 10 |0 11—1 1> Id |m 173 1> 173 1-! 1(~> |m |V) INJ IM 1^1 10 l~n 1-1II |m 10 10 l^ lt/1 H 10 (^ ,^, f7< I ) ;:-HC—78 <STC] ^ii-yi^Ai^ c»tjiy<r^ i^^iray .\^.:.?.:.^.Q:.....l^[.(c5J.'2^Li 31RST "TsfET (V-SfV n!^ ???.1T S^Tc'S'-7 '^)^?'=7 ^sf^fp? TiT^^ ^' 1^£tTf^t-^H ^WW3?lt?l 13/12/2004 Shri M.K, Bhadiui, Couiisel for fhe pctitioncrs. - Shri Ufkarsh Verma, | Panel Lav.ye.r for fh.e respondent i No.S/State, j Heafd on admission as •^•eU as on M.W.P.No.4532/2004. Petitioaers conteiition ia argument is that the learned appeUate Court grantiag injiinction agaiust thc petitioners has conunitted iUegality as no injijmction caii be granted against the co- shai'ers. | It is admitted position jtliat fhe owner of tlie suit house was Noor Mohammed and his sops and daughters are the petitioners aiid respondent No.l. It is ! evident that aftcr tlie death of Noor Mohammed B.O partition of ftie properti' took place ainongst fhe 1 ^ -t - petitioners and respondent f^o.l. Petitioner No.l is attenipting to deinolish the house and i^coijistruct the sanie. Therefore, a suit to restracn the petitioner No. 1 Jbr causing daiuage to fhe house has bccn filed aud by appUcation fcinporary injunction sought for. Leame.d appeUate Coitrt ordered iitvokmg fhe jurisdiction imder Onler 39, Rule 1 aud p ofthe C.P.C,, ttiat petitioner No.l is E restrained froin deinolishuig Lnd reconstrucnng fhe suit house nU ! the disposal of tlie suit, | The impugncd order dpes not rcstraui the petitioncrs froin j interfeiiag wifh. fheir possessfcn and enjo}rment of fhe suit properh'. 1 Whatever has been i^straiuell is that the petitioner. No. 1 shaU not dispossess respondent No. 1 ^nd shaU not construct fhe suit house i—-,-^^eI-4^H©fej^4»g-eI-«a»sa3.g^a33la8fctQ..fhe^uit4)^eJXuae&.„_^^^ -E-' ^ ~\ is%^ .). •s~^ '^T^ii^^'i, ^TTR-T^TS', T^^TRTtl'? -^H^an^^^-i^^^ t PiT^'WEB' "?TST 200 i^nrei; 1Hi?" aTiSBi Vt'fw^ 'w^t ^ fs^i Tfsre •^•f^Ti" •1^°^' ('tl|^1^^^^) ^Hi^'^T —3;a^.ag-Jnto-^ccQiinjL-the..l^cJ&^iEsentT^%S'%^^_tlieonler does not caU for any iaterferei^ce as neitlicr thfe order passed is wifhout jurisdiction nor is pafesed atousing fhe process of law. Therefore, the petitiou ib disniissed suininarily aad M.W.P.No.4532/2004 for iateru]ji reiiefis also dismissed. In fhe Ught of fhe afor|isaid order, I.A.No.8448/2004 for urgent hearing stands disposed Ipf, However, coiisidermg the of the case, it is directed that the leafned trial Couit shall disbose of the case iit accordaace with law as earlv as possible. Sd/- V.K. Shrivastava Judge