Civil Revision No.7046 of 2011(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.7046 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: November 17, 2011 Smt.Jaitan .....Petitioner v. Smt.Sunita Devi and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Jainainder Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing of order dated 6.9.2011, Annexure P1, passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Fatehabad, vide which evidence of the petitioner was closed. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully including the impugned order passed by learned trial Court. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner- plaintiff that though three opportunities were availed by petitioner-plaintiff to adduce evidence and, however, on the date when impugned order was passed, petitioner-plaintiff could not come present as she was ill as she is aged 85 years. Hence, it is contended that only one opportunity be granted to petitioner-plaintiff to appear as her own witness. In view of these facts, one opportunity can be granted to petitioner-plaintiff to appear as her own witness and the other party can be compensated by way of cost. Civil Revision No.7046 of 2011(O&M) -2- Hence, the present revision petition is accepted. Impugned order is modified to the extent that learned trial Court is directed to grant one opportunity to petitioner-plaintiff to appear as her own witness subject to payment of `5,000/- as cost which shall be a condition precedent. Disposed of accordingly. 17.11.2011 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge