1 ao632.09.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Appeal from Order No. 632 of 2009 WITH Civil Application No. 789 of 2009 in AO 632/2009 Rajaram Shankar Gaikwad of Pune ...Appellant v/s. Vikrant Subhash Gaikwad of Pune & ors. ...Respondents Mrs. Veena Thadani for the appellant. Mrs. Sonawane -G.P. for respondents 3-4. Mr. S.R. Patil for respondent no.6 Mr. S.V. Kadam for respondents 1 & 2. CORAM:- B.R. GAVAI, J DATED :- JANUARY 24, 2011. P.C. The present Appeal challenges the order dated 30th March, 2009 vide which an Application below exhibit 5 for temporary injunction filed by the Respondent No. 1 has been allowed. 2. The impugned order has been passed prior to one year and nine months. Almost a period of one year, nine months has lapsed. In that view of the matter, I find that it will not be in the interest of justice to upset 2 ao632.09.sxw the same at this stage. It is not in dispute that the pleadings are complete and the suit is ripe for hearing. 3. The Appeal is, therefore, disposed of by directing the Learned Trial Court to decide the suit as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six months from today. 4. Civil Application is disposed of. (B.R. GAVAI, J)