IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.5456 of 2011 Date of Decision: 19th September, 2011 Santosh Kumari Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph,C.J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol,J. Whether approved for reporting1? No. For the petitioner: Mr.Digvijay Singh, Advocate. For the respondents:Mr.R.K.Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K.Verma, Dy. Advocate General for respondents No.1&2. Sanjay Karol, J. (Oral) Record produced by Shri Anil Sharma, Jr. Assistant, Office of C.D.P.O., Kangra, has been perused and returned. Petitioner’s ineligibility on the ground that her income is more than Rs.18000/-, as has been so held by the authorities below cannot be disputed. Such findings are based on inquiry conducted by the Tehsildar, Kangra. 2. Record further reveals that both the petitioner and private respondent hail from the same feeder area of the concerned Anganwari Centre (Bhai). As such, contention raised by the petitioner that Whether the reporters of Local Papers are allowed to see the Judgment? 2 private respondent was otherwise not eligible for this reason needs to be rejected. 3. For the aforesaid reasons, the present petition is dismissed. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice 19th September, 2011 (Justice Sanjay Karol) (C) Judge.