1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C.A. No.1289 of 2003 in MCA St. No.26741 of 2002 in Cont. Petition No. 86 of 2002 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha, J. DATE : January 19, 2007. Heard Mr. A.M.Deshmukh, learned counsel for the Applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant is unable to point out under what provision of the Contempt of Courts Act the order impugned can be reviewed or the matter can be re- heard. Under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, it is the aggrieved party who is entitled to file appeal u/s. 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act and the other party who has initiated the proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act does not have right to file appeal u/s. 19. In that view of the matter, the Civil Application No. 1289 of 2003 is dismissed as 'not maintainable'. Consequently, the Misc. Civil Application St. No.26741 of 2 2002 is also dismissed for the same reasons. JUDGE ssj