1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 3544 of 2009 Siddharth and anr v. State of Maharashtra -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr R.K. Tiwari, Advocate for applicants Mr Shyam Ahirkar, APP for State Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 19th January 2010 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Vide order dated 9th June 2009 passed in Criminal Application No. 1765 of 2009, liberty was granted to the applicants to move afresh if trial did not commence within three months therefrom. By the said order, learned trial Court was directed to expedite the trial. Learned APP now informs that the trial Court has fixed the date 20.2.2010 in order to settle programme for commencement of trial. Right to speedy trial is one of the well cherished right in favour of the accused. Since despite specific order from this Court, trial has not commenced, this Court is constrained to consider bail application of the applicants since accused cannot be made to wait for conclusion of trial indefinitely. 2. Injuries are prima facie seen to have been caused on leg and deceased died due to complication following fracture 2 injury. In these circumstances, I am inclined to release the applicants on bail. 3. Applicants be released on bail upon executing PR Bond in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- each with two or more sureties in the like amount. Applicants shall attend each date of hearing in trial and shall not commit any crime while on bail. Applicants are directed to supply their fixed address with telephone/cell phone number (if any) to the trial Court and communicate change therein, if any, in future. Application stands disposed of accordingly. Hamdast granted. Judge. Hsj