IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.22707 OF 2007 Between : A.V.M. High School .... PETITIONER AND The Governemtn of A.P. Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Education(PS) Department, and another. …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.22707 OF 2007 ORDER: This Writ Petition has been filed by A.P.M. High School, assailing the action of the respondents in not admitting the posts into grant-in-aid in spite of recommendation made by the High Level Committee. 2. The petitioner’s school was established in the year 1976-1977 with English Medium from KG to IV Class and thereafter, upgraded from I class to V class in Telugu Medium in the year 1978-1979 and further upgraded as High School upto X Class in Telugu Medium. The petitioner school was granted grant-in-aid vide G.O.Ms.No.8, dated 31.01.1992. The petitioner school filed W.P.No.7511 of 2001, seeking direction to the respondents for sanction of certain posts into grant-in-aid as per the eligibility of A.P. Educational Rules and the said writ petition came to be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to take appropriate steps to consider the proposal submitted by the petitioner. Since the respondents have not implemented the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.7511 of 2001, the petitioner filed Contempt Case and the same came to be closed in view of the proceedings in Memo No.11048/PS-2/2003-1, dated 09.07.2003, issued by the first respondent. The petitioner school filed W.P.No.16086 of 2003 assailing the rejection order of the first respondent and seeking direction to the respondents to accept the proposals sent by the Deputy Educational Officer, Vikarabad vide letter No.20/A1/Dy.Edv/03 dated 14.02.2003. That writ petition came to be allowed on 20.07.2005. The order passed in the writ petition reads as hereunder: “Since the school was admittedly started in the year 1977 and was in existence as on 1st September, 1985, the case of the petitioner should have been considered in accordance with the Rules. The High Level Committee has passed the impugned order mechanically and without application of mind and hence it is liable to be set aside. For the above reasons, the writ petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside. The High Level Committee shall pass necessary orders to admit the posts of the petitioner’s school into grant-in-aid after giving reasonable opportunity to the petitioner. No costs”. 3. As per the directions passed by this Court in W.P No.16086 of 2003, the High Level Committee recommended the petitioner school for admitting certain posts into grant-in-aid. The petitioner school submitted representation dated 15.05.2007 to the first respondent to sanction grant in posts. There being no response from the respondents, the petitioner school approached this Court invoking the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 4. Rule nisi came to be issued on 29.10.2007. The petitioner school moved W.P.M.P.No.29543 of 2007 in W.P.No.22707 of 2007, seeking direction to the respondents to consider the representation, dated 15.5.2007, for sanction of grant-in-aid posts. When the W.P.M.P. came up for consideration, with the consent of learned counsel to dispose of the writ petition, the same was disposed of finally. 5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 6. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation submitted on 15.5.2007, for sanction of grant-in-aid posts is not being considered by the first respondent. 7. Such is the situation, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the first respondent to consider the representation, dated 15.5.2007, and pass appropriate orders in accordance the rules in force, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J JUNE 01, 2010. YVL