HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITON No.19675 OF 2007 ORDER: The petitioners complain that the authorities of the Municipal Corporation and Roads & Buildings Department have demolished their compound wall of the premises bearing No.7-2-105/1 to 3, Nagarjuna Sagar Road, Hyderabad for the purpose of widening the road and utilised a strip of 20 feet throughout for the purpose of widening of the road. Their case is that neither any proceedings are initiated under the Land Acquisition Act nor any compensation was paid. No counter is filed by the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that inspite of his best efforts, he could not get any instructions from his clients in the recent past. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the respondents. 4. There is a serious dispute as to whether the respondents have demolished the compound wall or utilize any property owned by the petitioners. A writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India does not provide any avenue for any disputed questions of fact. If the petitioners are so advised, they can file a suit for damages, where it would be possible for the Court to record a finding as to whether the possession of any property held by the petitioners was taken over and if so, the consequences that flow from it. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioners to pursue the remedies before a Civil Court. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J March 31, 2011 KTL