IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI FRIDAY, THE 19TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 28TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 32956 of 2010(T) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- K.K. DIVAKARAN, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.K.V. KUNJAYAPPAN, MANAGER, REGIONAL HI-TECH COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING, BEACH ROAD, CHINNAKKADA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.T.RAMPRASAD UNNI, SRI.PREM NAVAZ J.R. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM- 691 001. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLAM EAST- 691 001. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION, KOLLAM EAST- 691 001. 4. ASIF MOHAMMED, ASIF MANZIL, PAZHAKULAM ADOOR. 5. SHIJIN BABU,C/O.BABU. S, T.C.36/1651, SREEVARAHAM , VALLAKADAVU P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 008. 6. VIPIN. V.V, V.V. BHAVAN, PATTARIYIL, KATTAYIKONAM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 584. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.T.K. VIPINDAS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/11/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 32956/2010-T APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 28/09/2010 ISSUED BY THE KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE R1. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 15/10/2010 ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 21/10/2010 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs K.M.JOSEPH & M.C. HARI RANI,JJ ============================== W.P.(C) NO. 32956 OF 2010 ============================ Dated this the 19th day of November, 2010 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. The petitioner has approached this court seeking the following reliefs:- “i) To issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 to provide adequate and effective protection to the life of the petitioner and for the smooth conduct of classes in the institute managed by the petitioner. ii) To issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 to register cases against the criminal acts of respondents 4, 5 and 6 and conduct a meaningful investigation into their illegal actions”. 2. The petitioner is the Manager of an educational institution stating that there was a Television programme throwing bad light on the institution run by the petitioner at Wpc 32956/2010 2 Kollam leading to confusion among the students and others associated with the institute. It is alleged that there is threat of damage by large number of students and some of the students wanted return of their money. Steps were taken to refund the amounts to those students who do not want to continue their studies thereafter. While so, some of the former students barged into the institute again and caused damage to the office and furniture. Finding no response on expected lines, the petitioner is before us. We have already passed an interim order in this matter. Though served, there is no appearance for the party respondents. 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, we dispose of the writ petition by directing the respondents 1 and 2 to provide effective protection to the life of the petitioner and also for the smooth conduct of classes in the institute managed by the petitioner as against any obstruction by respondents 4 to 6 as and when the matter is brought to the notice of the second respondent. K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE M.C. HARI RANI,JUDGE lgk