-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.8547 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.8547 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.8547 OF 2005 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.Vilas Mali for the Applicant Mr.D.P.Adsule, A.P.P. for State Mr.D.R.Patil for Respondent No.2 CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : DECEMBER 11,2006. : DECEMBER 11,2006. : DECEMBER 11,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Applicant, and the Advocate for the second Respondent. The Application is strongly opposed by the Advocate for the second Respondent. Considering the averments made in the application, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay of 120 days. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause of (a). Place the Application for leave on board on 24th January 2007. 2. The Advocate for the second Respondent brought to my notice that Shri Deepak C. Natu has applied for discharge by an Application dated 27th November 2006 filed -2- before the Registrar. Though the prayer made in the said Application is not proper, nevertheless the Registrar (Judicial-I) will consider the said Application as an Application for discharge filed under the Rules 8 (4) of the Rules framed by this Court under section 34 (1) of the Advocates Act, 1961 and will pass an appropriate order on the said Application. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE