'a^) ,*' •w- PETITIONER HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH 'BLE SHRi RAJEEVGUPTA, C.J. & 'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. ,P. C. No. 4651/20Q8 Rajesh Kumar Singh, aged 40 yrs., s/o Shri G.P. Singh, r/o Sri Girdhar Kunj, New Purenia, Ravigram, Raipur, C.G. Versus . Union of India, through Divisional Railway Manager (Commercial), S.E.C. Rly., Raipur, C.G. '. Shri M.K. Singh, the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, S.E.C. Rly., DRM CompIex,WRS Colony, Ralpur, C.G. Writ Petition under Article 226 and 227 ofthe Constitution of Present: Shri Bhishma Kinger, learned counsel forthe petitioner. Ms. Naushina Afrin Ali, learned counsel on behalfof Shri Amit Choudhary, learned standing counsel forthe respondents. ISt (1s1 September, 2008) The foilowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Learned counsel for the parties are heard on I.A. No.3/2008, an application for grant of leave to amend the writ petition. 2. The petitioner, by the proposed amendment in the writ petition, seeks to challenge the cancellation of his licence by the respondents vide order dated 25-08-2008 (Annexure P/5). >l UL?MI;...i.l.Illl.!..iut.W fe(^ B '?I subbu 3. In our opinion, cancellation of the petitioner's iicence is a fresh cause of action for which the petitioner, if advised, may file a separate writ petition. 4. In this view ofthe matter,I.A. No.3/2008 failsand is hereby dismissed. 5. Shri BhishmaKinger, learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with the iiberty of filing another writ petition for the reliefs sought in this writ petition and also challenging the cancellation of the petitioner's licence vide order dated 25-08-2008 and the other anclltary reliefs. 6. Permissiongranted. 7. With the above !iberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. -7 Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Sunii Kumar Sinha &' <w