-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.65 of 2005 IN SUIT NO.3686 OF 1990 Premla Punjabi & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs Mrs Rakhi Asandas Teckwani & Ors. .. Respondents Vs The Court Receiver, .. Applicants. Mr Shailesh shah with ms Deepa Kamath for the petitioners. Mr D.R.Dhurat i/c Court Receiver present. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 16.12.2005. DATE : 16.12.2005. DATE : 16.12.2005. PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. This review petition is filed by the petitioners/occupants of the flats in question. They -2- are not parties to the suit. They are seeking review of the orders dated 18.11.2005 and 25.11.2005 passed on the Court Receiver’s report dated 18.6.2005. Mr. Shah, learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing this petition for some time, prays for its withdrawal with liberty to the petitioners to take appropriate proceedings to protect their possession of the flats in their occupation. The review petition is allowed to be withdrawn as prayed for. 3. At this stage, Mr Shah, learned counsel for the petitioners, prays for stay of the action of taking possession of the flats in question in pursuance of the orders dated 18th and 25th November, 2005. Though I am not inclined to grant stay, in order to give them some breathing time the Court Receiver is directed not to take possession, if not taken already, of the flats in question till 25th December, 2005. (D.B.Bhosale,J.)