IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 30TH NOVEMBER 2006 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 Con.Case(C).No. 1159 of 2006(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.20884/2006 .................... PETITIONER ----------------- N.P.SASIDHARAN, S/O. SANKARAN, AGED 56 YEARS, PARAYIL HOUSE, VALAPATTANAM P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL V.MOHAMMED RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS 1, 2, AND 7 ------------------------------------ 1. NIVEDITHA P. HARAN, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY TO REVENUE (L) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. ISHITHA ROY, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR. 3. MRUDULA, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, SOUTH BAZAR ROAD, PAYYANNUR, KANNUR DISTRICT-670 307. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MATHEW G.VADAKKAL THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/11/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- C.O.C.NO. 1159 of 2006 ---------------------------------- Dated this 30th day of November, 2006 JUDGMENT Even though the petitioner may have genuine grievance about the order which has been passed by the Government on the appeal preferred by the 5th respondent in the writ petition, I am not able to accept the argument of the petitioner that the respondents have violated the directions in Annexure A 1 judgment. The Contempt of Court Case, therefore, will stand closed giving liberty to the petitioner to initiate separate proceedings impugning the order passed by the Government, if he is aggrieved. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE Judge dpk