5 /" •BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT W.P.(S) N0. BILASPUR (C.G.) e,\1 n-»\1(^ PETTIONER : ^\^€- .*** *!>' 'v:^€ ^^•^p^:/ ..-:fl^^'" - •,.-••" ^ ^' »)*• ..?< '>\\>;p .rf.' ' ^.·-''° RESPONDENTS OF20W Jivan lal banjare , S/o Heeradas aged about 62 years, Retired Time keeper Municipal Council Mungeli Tilak ward Lornii marg Mungeli District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through : the Secretary, Urban Adrainistration D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Chief Municipal Officer Municipal Council Mungeli Mungeli District Mungeli (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF WRIT OR The petitioner begs to submit as under 01. Particulars of the petitioner : As given in the above cause title. 02. Particulars ofthe Respondents : As given in.the above cause title. HiGH COURT OF-CHHATTiSGARH AT: BILASPUR PETiTIONEi RESPONDENTS WRITPETiTiON (S). ^921^f20ll Jivan LaS Baniare VERSUS State of Chhattlsgarh & A' 2. -"5 WRIT PETiTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 CF THE CONSTuUTICN C~ INDIA SB: Hon'bleShri PrashantKumar Mishra, J. Fresent: S'nri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for ths petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubev, GovemtT'ent Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Fasssd &nl7c!ay of February, 2011) 1, Learnec counaei appearing for the petitioner submits thaf the cass, beins oavment of retlrai benefits matter, mav bs referred tc the pension commitiiee. This Court, in (he mattsr of W.P. No. 4642.20Q4 (Basjnath Manda! v. The State of ChhaHssgam & Others) and cther connecied mastere, oirscted the Committee to consider the matter of retira! dues as she cfisputed quest'o" of facis wsre Inv&lved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursusiit io the order datecS ^-c n^? ^r^n^: ^•acc'^..-^ i.-^ \i\i "I-^.US.^UUO OS5SSQ IH VV. I~Sr. 'r^u. 1961/2006 tSini Ksja Eai /"'^^/^i ^^^a^Jur^t ^^t fr^ ". ^ J(^'^/^ •^'^S ^^±^*'LJ/i%^~3-l<^lt^s<'*u1^'^' ^''y^-^V fM^^^*^^ ^^\ ^ y^-Ln<1 /*L!?'^U.A^ rfc^^*l'^l. LfnQHGfa^Sr V. ofQr© '^O'y^'Hs'TI^HT SHQ 0''(HSrS} ^HQ Oi'QSf QSISQ 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2003 (SteEe of Chhamsgsrh & Others v. Baiinath Manda! anct anathen. Thus. this petition is squareiy covered by the judgment and order dated 31'" of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 Baiinaih Manaai (supra) as submitted by iearned counse! appeanng for the parties. This Detltion ss accordJngiv disposed of iri the same terms i.e. the office of the Advocate Genera! is directed to send tbs case to the ,»^^iF*>rtd4^'^S.^'^ ^AJ^^^V^ **! V\J^sr*fto*^ ^*,^ '^. ^- ^^!^^Cl T^'J^!?^'^ '^.^^S E^^r'^i^ ^^'^ 3r^-;'^.^ld :frtii'^1 ^"l^ ^ "ii'TiiliS^. Wsi,;"n?i ci ^^HUQ C'' iO v3c;VSs itUs'H l.nsi l^cii.;c y' isr^^siiJs. Us sl ; C053V Of the setitipn from the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the •^!. » ^'ss^m \8 2 Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concerned, withsn a fyrther period of 15 days. The Committee shail consider and pass order, in accordance wlth iaw, sfter affording proper opportunity of hearing fo the petitsoner. The petitioner and the officers concerned mav fiie additional doeuments,. if necessaw. The entire exeretee; including payment of retirsi dues, if any, to the petitioner be compieted wsShin a period of six v/eeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. The petitioner shail suppiy extra eopy of tbe petition to the learned counsel apDearina IEor tha resDondents for fon.vardina the same to the tommittee. Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge