,: v x mw‘m' \N J. gm/vow ( HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR VVrit Petition (S) No. 7132 of2%7 Raj Kumar Dubey, S/o Late Shri Jamuna Prasad Dubey, Aged about 58 years, R/o H/No. 93/107, Rajiv Gandhi Ward, ?aras Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS I’E _ ITIONER . Food Corporation of India, Through- Managing Dircctor, Hcjad Qualtsr—New Deihi, 16-20 Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi. 2. The Executive Director, Food Corporation of India, Dhiraj Anna Building, Near Anant Kanekar' Police Statiom Bandra (East) Mumbai 40005 1 . The General Manger, Food Corporation of India, Ring Road Chouraha, Telibandha, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4. The Area Manager, Food Corporation of Lndia, Madeena Building, Jail Road, Raipur Chhattisgar‘n. 5. The Employees Provident Fund Organization, Through Commissioner, Regional Oiiice, 8 & 9m Floor. Mayor Bhawan, Cormaught Circus, New Delhi-1. (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present : Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri B.P. Gupta, Advocate for the respondent No.1 to 4. RESPONDENTS v ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 03” of Deeemher, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by a decision/order dated 24.10.2007 passed by this court in W.P. (S) No. 6280/2007 (KM. Agmwal Vs. Food Corporation of India and Others), wherein, the petitioner was granted liberty to file a detailed representation to the respondent No. 1, to consider his case in accordance with law within a period of 60 days. . hi- . Shti B.P. Gupta, Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 to 4 submits that the diSposal of his representation may require some more time, thus, the respondents be granted 90 day's time to consider and decide his representation / . In view of the forgoing, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a detailed representation before the respondent authorities within a period of three week’s. Thereader, the respondent authorities shall consider the case on merit in accordance with law, within a period of90 days dam the receipt ofthe said representation. “W Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sahu