IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.3129 OF 2008 SMT. RESHMA S. KAMBLE ... PETITIONER. VS. SMT. PREMA A. VITEKAR & ORS. RESPONDENTS. SHRI NITIN DESHPANDE FOR THE PETITIONER. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.A.SAYED, J. : A.A.SAYED, J. : A.A.SAYED, J. DATE DATE DATE : May 6, 2008. : May 6, 2008. : May 6, 2008. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner. This petition has been filed impugning the Order dated 18.12.2007, passed by the District Judge Gadhinjlaj, Kolhapur whereby the application of the respondent/ plaintiff to amend the plaint has been allowed by the Trial Court. 2. Having gone through the impugned order and the material on record, I find that the Trial Court has, in its discretion, allowed the amendment. In my view the discretion exercised by the Trial Court is judicious and cannot be said to be patently erroneous or perverse. 3. In this view of the matter, the impugned order does not warrant interference by this Court in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed. ..... [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, J.] J.] J.]