-ffo € s~- .31 s\^ 31^l ar-a ii s*. ^^ ^ + ,' XI-HC-22 '3^? -^WW^, W\W' . fqclKiy 3TT^T 'VRR '1^9' 111CTI Shliqi 2fl0 3T1^T%1 h-U'h 3fl^I aiiwgftg Praweea sn^i'TOiiwdfet ^NCTTI^ •RTCTf •? fet^ tfsr^R ^ aipgrt an^ fSB : Hpn'ble Shri Manindra Mjahau Shrivastava, J.] 30.3.2011 This is an OHice R^ference. Shri Suryakant Mishra, P^nel Lawyer appears on behalf of theState. * This Court vide order dafted 8.10.2010 passed ia Cr.^VI.P. No.778/10 directed ffae trial Co|urt to positively conclude tlie trial ori or before 31st December, 20 }0. The leamed trial Court hbs sent a requisition memo dated 31.12.2010, stating reason^ for non-conclusion of the proceeciings within the stipijpated time and has prayed for extension of 3 nionths. Havtng gone through fhe memo dated 31.12.2010 by thq the trial shall be concluded \\^ SlstMarch, 2011. The petition (Cr.M.P. disposed of. 'easong which have been stat.ed ia trial Court, it is now directed fhat |ithin fhe period as prayed for i.e. No.40/11) is accordingly fmally Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge I^'^RTO 4