FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.130 OF 2010 IN FIRST COURT APPEAL ST.NO.10982 OF 2010 Jagdish Dayal Giri .... Applicant Vs. Shraddha Jagdish Giri .... Respondent Mrs. Vasanti Joshi Advocate for appellant. Mr. A.M. Vernekar, Advocate for respondent. Coram : A.P. DESHPANDE & SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. Date : 29th April,2010 P.C. 1. By the present application, the applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 1 year, 13 days in filing the appeal. According to the learned counsel for the applicant, as the Family Court had disposed of both the petitions by common judgment, separate appeals ought to have been filed, however, only one appeal was filed. When it was realised that it is obligatory on the part of applicant to file separate appeals, with the leave of the court, a separate appeal has been filed calling in question, the order passed in the petition for custody by the Family Court. Having regard to the reason assigned for delay, in the interest of justice, delay needs to be condoned. Learned counsel for the respondent in all fairness does not oppose the application. Hence, for the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and disposed off. (Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota,J) (A.P. DESHPANDE, J.)