IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31271 of 2010 1. RAM BACHAN SAH 2. Ram Sharan Sah Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 13-09-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the occurrence took place when the accused persons assaulted the informant with Lathi, Mukka and bricks and they are in custody since 27-04-2010 and 29-06-2010 respectively but they have no criminal antecedent, let the petitioners, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5000/- with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the court to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Sheohar at Sitamarhi in connection with Sheohar P.S.Case No. 66 of 2010 subject to the conditions that : (a) one of the bailors will be close relatives of the petitioners, who will give affidavits, giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioners. The bailors will also undertake to inform the court, if there is any 2 change in the addresses of the petitioners; (b) the affidavits shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and if they are, they shall not be released on bail; (c) the bailors shall also state on affidavits that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse; (d) the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Sujit (Anjana Prakash,J.)