FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.284 OF 2009 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2 At the outset, the learned Counsel for the respondent brought to the notice of this Court that the contempt petition is not maintainable in view of the alternative remedy available to the petitioner. The learned Counsel for the respondent placed reliance on the reported judgment in the case of Mohammad Salam Anamul Haque vs S.A. Azmi reported in 2001(1) Mh.L.J. 249. When confronted with the said judgment, the learned Counsel for the petitioner has fairly accepted that the ratio of the said judgment is file proceedings for execution. 3 In the light of above, this contempt petition is disposed of. Notice is discharged. If the petitioner is aggrieved, he can take recourse to the alternate remedy. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) 07.10.2010. PLK/*