HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 143 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 143 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 143 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.106 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.106 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.106 OF 2008 Babasaheb S. Waghmare and anr.... Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.Shrikant Yadav for the Applicant. Mr.H.J.Dedhia, A.P.P. for State. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: APRIL 08, 2008 DATED: APRIL 08, 2008 DATED: APRIL 08, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The applicants were not on bail during the pendency of the trial. Considering the evidence on record, the learned Sessions Judge has held the appellant guilty and convicted them for life imprisonment. It is submitted on behalf of the applicants that the applicants did not apply for bail during the pendency of the trial. Considering the judgment of the trial court, dying declarations and evidence on record, it is not possible at this stage to grant bail. Hence application for bail rejected. (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)