IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY FRIDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY WRIT PETITION No.553 of 2008 Between: N.Vengal Rao.. … Petitioner AND Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Reptd., by Commissioner & Special Officer and 2 others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri O.Manohar Reddy. Counsel for the respondents: Sri R.Ramachandra Reddy, Standing counsel for GHMC. THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.553 OF 2008 ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the tender schedule of the petitioner for the works notified in tender notification issued by the 2nd respondent in No.F/H&S/1402/2007-08 dated 27-11-2007 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider the tender of the petitioner for the works notified … At the hearing, Sri R.Ramachandra Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, submitted that the petitioner was entrusted with the contract work in respect of which he filed his tender. Sri O.Manohar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner says that in view of the statement of the learned Standing Counsel for GHMC, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. ------------------------------ ------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J 15-2-2008 MNR