IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6209 of 2009(O&M) Date of Decision 28.10.2009 Dharambir ...... Petitioner VERSUS Ratni and others ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Mani Ram Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL): Aggrieved against the order dated 29.08.2009, passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bhiwani, allowing the application of respondent No.1-plaintiff, for impleading Narinder son of Dharambir as party defendant, the petitioner-defendant No.2(herein referred as 'the petitioner') has preferred this petition. On the application of the plaintiff-respondent No.1 Under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C., Narinder son of Dharambir, being necessary party, was impleaded as defendant to contest the suit. The petitioner also admits that the disputed property bearing MC Unit No. S-17 has wrongly been included by the plaintiff-respondent No.1 in the case as it belonged to Ram Chander son of Hari Ram from whom this unit has been purchased. Thus, it appears that the plaintiff-respondent No.1 also disputes number of the disputed property. If Narinder son of Dharambir contests the suit alongwith the petitioner then his rights will hardly be effected. Finding no merit in this petition, the same is dismissed. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 28.10.2009 mamta-II