IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 13TH OCTOBER 2011 / 21ST ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 27034 of 2011(D) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. SUDHIN U.K., S/O. V.P. SURESHAN, 'SUDINAM', NEAR S.S. TEMPLE, MAHADEVAGRAMAM, PAYYANNUR P.O., KANNUR, KERALA - 670 001. 2. KIRAN KUMAR C., CHEEKKOTH HOUSE, KALLIKKANDY POST, THUVAKUNNU VIA, KANNUR, KERALA - 673 302. BY ADV. SMT.MEDONA LOPEZ RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673 635. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673 635. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC., UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 27034/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE EXAMINATION RESULTS OF 1ST PETITIONER DOWNLOADED FROM THE INTERNET SITE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT. P2: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. P3: COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF RS.265/- REMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. P4: COPY OF THE EXAMINATION RESULTS OF 2ND PETITIONER DOWNLOADED FROM THE INTERNET SITE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT. P5: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. P6: COPY OF THE RECEIPTS OF RS.280/- AND RS.140/- REMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 27034 of 2011 D ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 13th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petitioners 1 and 2 submit that they appeared for B.Tech 8th and 6th semester examinations respectively and failed in some papers. They submitted Exts.P2 and P5 applications respectively for revaluation and filed this writ petition seeking an order for expeditious revaluation and declaration of their results. 2. I heard standing counsel appearing for the University also. 3. Having regard to the facts pointed out, it is directed that the University shall complete the revaluation sought for and declare the result of the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, provided the applications have been received and are W.P.(C) No.27034/2011 : 2 : otherwise in order. 4. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the University for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/13/10 The words “B.Tech 8th and 6th semester examinations respectively” occurring in line 2 of the first paragraph of W.P. (C) No.27034/2011 are corrected and substituted as “B.Tech 6th semester examination”, vide order dated 04.11.2011 in I.A.No.17301/2011 in W.P.(C) No.27034/2011. Sd/- Registrar (Judicial) // True Copy // P.A. To Judge