THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos: 1583&1610 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: These writ petitions are filed assailing the memo, dated 23.01.2009 issued by the Sub-Registrar, Choutuppal, 2nd respondent herein. The petitioners presented documents dated 17.01.2009 before the 2nd respondent herein for registration. The documents were executed by a person claiming to be the G.P.A. under document No.29 of 1996. The said G.P.A. in turn was executed by two individuals by name D.Ramulu and D.Yadamma. On verification of the records, the 2nd respondent found that one of the principals viz., Ramulu died and that the other principal viz., Yadamma had revoked the G.P.A. through document No.1 of 2009. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioners do not dispute that the documents in their favour were executed by the G.P.A. under document No.29/96. It hardly needs any emphasis that the death of the principal would terminate the power of attorney. Even if one of the joint executants of G.P.A. dies, the same result ensues. Added to that, the other principal has also revoked the G.P.A. In that view of the matter, it cannot be said that there was a valid or effective execution of documents in favour of the petitioners. The question of accepting the documents to registration does not arise. In case, the petitioners have any right vis-à-vis the property, they have to work out their remedies by filing suits, either against the person, who executed the documents in their favour, or against the actual owners. Therefore, the writ petitions are dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioners to work out their remedies in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 03.02.2009 JSU THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos: 1583&1610 of 2009 Date: 03.02.2009 JSU