1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.479/2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2828/2010 (D) Nandkishor Shridhar Akhade ...Versus... State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary, Ministry of Social Welfare, Culture & Sports, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. [Shri C.M. Munje, Adv. for applicant] CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATE : 09.11.2011. On 1.3.2011 this Court has disposed of Writ Petition No.2828/2010 after noticing that the petitioner claimed status as Banjara and documents produced by him reveal the same to be Wanjari (Nomadic Tribe). The Division Bench specifically found that contention of petitioner that there is no difference between Banjara or Wanjari was misconceived. The review of the said order is sought by pointing out a judgment dated 28.3.2005 in Writ Petition No.5250/2004. There, the petitioner had produced documents, showing caste as Wanjari and the claim was also for very same caste. The said claim was rejected by holding that the said 2 petitioner was not Banjara . After noticing these facts, the Division Bench of this Court has allowed that petition. Those facts are entirely different. We find no merit in the present review petition. Misc. Civil Application is rejected. No order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE ssw