© IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No Q.S'^l/ 7~ 2001 PETITIONER ..^^ .'b". ..• ^••:$"y .-•••'y^ .0' ,<4 " ,.. : • ^ ^0'.^- RESPONDENTS Dr. S. N. Rai, S/o Shri Sitaram. Rai, aged about 33 years, R/o Suraj Universal Medical College & Hospital, Distt. Janjgir (C.G.) VERSUS ^The State of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary Home (Police) D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Supermtendent of Police, Janjgir, Distt. Janjgir (C.G.) 3. Shri Ram Krishna Sahu, Dy. Superintendent of Police, Janjgir, Distt. Janjgir (C.G.) .J<^_ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETmONER RESPONDENTS H!GH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUR WRiT PETIT10N N0. 2531 OF 2001 Dr. S.N. Rai Versus The State of Chhattisgarh & Othere (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Ms. Sharmila Singhai, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State. ORDER ... . , . (Passed on this 16th day of NovembeF, 2011) 1. Learned oounsel appearing for the petitioner submite that with the passage of time, the petition has bwome infructuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side does not controvert the above submission. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed, as having become snfructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok F