(1) (938) MCA 4 & 27/11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Amk MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4 OF 2011 Deepika Charudutt Shisode .. Applicant Vs. Charudutta Arun Shisode .. Respondent Mr. Rajesh More for the Applicant. Mr. S. P. Mungate for Respondent No.1. WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 27 OF 2011 Charudutta Arun Shisode .. Applicant Vs. Deepika Charudutt Shisode & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. S. P. Mungate for the Appellant. Mr. Rajesh More for Respondent No.1. Ms. V. S. Mhaispurkar for Respondent No.2. CORAM : MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J. Date : 17 th August, 2011. P.C. 1. The dispute in this application is between the wife and the husband. The wife lives in Pune. The husband lives in Mumbai. The wife has filed a petition for maintenance in Pune. She had also filed a petition for restitution of conjugal rights which has been withdrawn. After more than a year of the application for maintenance having been filed, the husband has filed a divorce petition in Mumbai. Both (2) (938) MCA 4 & 27/11 the petitions must be tried together. Since the wife resides where the earlier petition filed, the husband’s petition shall be transferred to Pune Family Court. 2. The apprehension of the husband that he would be assaulted is made out in various complaints. Those complaints would have to be proved to be believed. The complaints are not the reason for not transferring the petition of the husband to be tried together along with wife’s earlier petition. Both the matters shall proceed in Pune Family Court. 3. Both the applications disposed of accordingly. (ROSHAN DALVI, J.)