C.W.P. No. 17328 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- C.W.P. No. 17328 of 2009 Date of Decision : 15.12.2009 Sethpal ... Petitioner. Vs. Financial Commissioner Haryana & Anr. ...Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI Present:- Mr. R.S.Mamli, Advocate, for the petitioner. Permod Kohli, J. Petitioner made an application for correction of the Khasra Girdawari before the Assistant Collector, Second Grade, Chhachhrauli, District Yamunagar, claiming possession over the land said to be belonging to the Khewat-Khatoni of the village Khadri Tehsil Chhachhrauli. The land accorded is as "mustarka Malkan". The petitioner claimed that he is in possession being share-holder and has grown Barsin and Jammi crop. However, the entry in Khasra Girdawari has been recorded in the name of Parkash Son of Hema, father of respondent No.2. It is also alleged that father of the respondent died 20 years back. The stand of the private respondent is that land was cultivated by Parkash, which fact is also recorded in the Jamabandi. It is stated that once the entries are made in the Jamabandi, the Collector ceases to have restriction to change the enteries. This was also pleaded that civil suit is pending between the parties and there is an interim order of stay. The claim of the petitioner is also disputed by the respondent. The Assistant Collector vide his order dated 5.12.2007, dismissed the application holding that the C.W.P. No. 17328 of 2009 land in dispute is shamilat deh and all the persons have not been made parties though necessary. It was also noticed that in view of interim order granted by the Civil Court this application is not maintainable. Aggrieved of the aforesaid , the petitioner herein preferred an appeal before the Collector District Yamunanagar. The appellate authority vide order dated 6.5.2008 dismissed the appeal. A revision preferred by the petitioner before the Commissioner, Ambala Division, Ambala, aslo resulted in dismissal and a further revision before the Financial Commissioner also met the same fate. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in possession and revenue authorities were required to make enteries in Khasra Girdawari on the basis of actual physical possession. There is concurrent finding by all the authorities below that the land is shamilat deh and in view of the interim stay from the Civil Court, the issue cannot be considered. It is also recorded that the father of respondent No.2 is shown to be in possession not only in Khasra Girdawari but in Jamabandi as well. In these circumstances, no interference is warranted in exercise of writ jurisdiction in respect of concurrent findings by four authorities. Petition is dismissed. December 15, 2009 (Permod Kohli) tripti Judge