IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39945 of 2010 JAGDISH YADAV SON OF SRI RAMI YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SAROJA BELA TOLA BELHA, P.S. MARAUNA, DISTRICT- SUPAUL--- PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR—OPP. PARTY. ----------- 3/ 26-03-2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a criminal prosecution registered under sections 307 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not named in the F.I.R. and even during the course of investigation, no tangible material has been collected by the Investigating Officer to show the complicity of the petitioner for committing the crime in question. Learned Addl. P.P. has fairly submitted that in paragraph-40 the case diary it has come that one co- accused Amal Yadav assaulted the informant and the petitioner has not been specifically attributed any specific role for committing the crime in question. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the above named petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Marauna P.S. Case 2 No. 59 of 2008, subject to conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. BTiwary/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)