IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14583 of 2011 RAM CHANDRA RAI S/O LATE BAM BAHADUR RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 10.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner being Panchayat Mukhiya is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 406, 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner is that in 2006-07 he got solar lights of a local company at higher rate than the prescribed rate. It is alleged that as per the Government direction the solar lights were to be purchased by Beltron Company. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the direction for purchase from the Beltron Company has been issued from the office of the District Magistrate, Vaishali on 14.01.2011 as contained in Annexure-3 whereas the scheme was executed in 2006-07 for which the F.I.R. has been lodged in 2011. Considering the aforesaid facts, 2 let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali, in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 38 of 2011, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Safik (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)