IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.689 of 2011 Nandlal Kumar @ Bantu, Son of Jagdish Yadav, Resident of Mohalla- New Godam, Pahsi, P.S.-Kotwali, District-Gaya. …..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar …..Opposite Party. ---------------------------------- 06/ 25.08.2011 Learned Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to correct the year of Kotwali P.S. Case No. which is mentioned in Paragraph No. 3 and prayer portion, in course of the day. The accused-petitioner has preferred this revision application under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice Act against the order dated 03.05.2011 passed by the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya in Criminal Appeal (Juvenile)No. 3 of 2011 by which the order dated 01.04.2011 passed by the court of Juvenile Justice Board, Magadh Division, Gaya has been confirmed and the appeal has been dismissed and the prayer for bail of the petitioner was also rejected. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State. It is submitted that the petitioner was declared juvenile by the Juvenile Justice Board, thereafter, his prayer for bail was rejected. It has also been submitted that 2 looted mobile has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It has further been submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and there is no material on the record to show that the release of the petitioner will defeat the ends of justice. Learned Counsel for the State has submitted that a report has also been called for from the Probation Officer. The report is at Flag ‘C’. The report dated 17.03.2011, sent by the Probation Officer, in which he has mentioned that the petitioner can be released on bail on certain conditions that his parents will look after him and he will remain away from the anti-social elements. After hearing both the parties and perusal of the impugned order, it appears that there is no material on the record to show that release of the petitioner is likely to bring him into association of known criminals or expose his to moral, physical, psychological danger or his release will defeat the ends of justice. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in my opinion, the impugned order is not fit to be sustained. It 3 is set aside. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 7,000/- (seven thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Gaya in connection with Trial No. 1226 of 2011 arising out of Kotwali P.S. Case No. 332 of 2010 and in Criminal Appeal (Juvenile) No. 3 of 2011 with the following conditions: (i) the father of the petitioner will be one of the bailors, he will produce the petitioner before the Juvenile Justice Board if and when required, in case of absence on two consecutive dates his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled. (ii) the petitioner will not indulge in similar or any other offence, in case of violation of the terms his bail bond liable to be cancelled by Juvenile Justice Board and he shall be taken into custody. In the result, this revision application is allowed. kksinha/- (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)