^ '. 'l -^ ss (g) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR PBTITIONER RESPONDENTS W.P,.lSLNp.7420^ot2007 Kirti Kum.ar Kashyap, S/o Shri Rain Vatar, aged 48 years, Assistant Teacher, Govenxment Pnmaiy School, Duinarkherwa, Block Marwahi, DistrictBilaspur (C.G.) yersus 1 State of Chliattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, School Educatiou Department, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.) 2 The Director, Public Instrucfion Department, Raipur(C.G.) 3. Block Education. Officer, Marwalu, District Bflaspur (C.G.) (Writ Petition under Article 226 pfthe Constitution Qflndial Shri Dhirendra Mislira, counsel for tbe petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Paael Lawyer, for the State ou advan.ee copy. QRAL ORDER (17.12.2007) SUNII-KUMAR^INHA^ J, Heard on adiaission. Leaiiied counsel for the petitioner subiruts fhat the issue iavolved in fhe case is as to whefher fhe petitioner is entifled to regular pay scale w.e.f. fhe date of iaitial appointment or froin tbe date of completion of probation. period. He subimts fhat the issue iuvolved hereia was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Adiiiirustrative Tribunal, Jabalpur m O.A.No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. Ss others), whereia, it was held fhat ftie sytularly situated teachers are entiUed to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of iaitial appoiatment. The inatterwas taken up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court iu Special Leave Petition (Civfl) No. 6892/93. The said petition was disinissed by the Hon'ble Supreiae Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect fhat fhe Teachers/ Shyna W.P.(S)No.7420/2007 Assistant Teachers are entifled to regular pay scale from the date of iuitial appointment. Leamed counsel for the petitioner furfher subniits fhat this Court, wtule considering the same issue ui Ram. Kurnar Sahu & ofhers Vs. State Govt. of Chhatdsgarh & aaother (W.P.(S) No. 813 of 2007) by order dated 12.2.2007, has granted regular pay scale w.e.f. the date ofinitial appoiatment. Leamed counsel for the parties joiatly subinit that tlus case is squarely covered by fhe decision of this Court ia fhe case of Ram Kuinar Sahu and another (Supra). In view offhat, fhis petition is allowed ia fhe same terms. However, fhis order shaU be subject to aU verifications inade by fhe State regardiag facts pleaded ia the petition. Sd/- ( i Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge s^