:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ASN WRIT PETITION NO.476 OF 2008 M/s. Shree Pushkar Petro Products Ltd. ..Petitioners. Vs. Union of India and ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Kiran Balani with Mr. Jerry Lewis for the Petitioners. Mr.R. Ashokan with Mr.S.D.Bhosale for the Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED : 28th March,2008. PC : 1. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. It is the contention of the petitioners that they had filed application on 12.9.2007 and without notice to them the application was heard and disposed of by the Settlement Commission on 13.9.2007. It is pointed out that, in Para-1, the statement was recorded that Shri. Sujeet Kantawala appeared on their behalf is not correct. They had moved an application for revocation wherein they had pointed out that they had not been given any notice for personal hearing. This averment is also reiterated in the petition in Para-20. 3. On behalf of the respondents, in Para 13 the Dy.Director has filed a reply in answer to this :2: contention and pointed out what is set out in Para 13 of the order. 4. It is true that the petitioners have not specifically denied that they had not engaged any Advocate to appear on their behalf. However, contention urged by them is that no notice of hearing was given and the same has not been contested by the respondents. This would make it clear that they were not represented on that day. In the light of above, the impugned order in so far as petitioners are concerned is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Settlement Commission for disposal of the matter according to law. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. The entire exercise be completed within three months from the date of receipt of the order. To be served by the respondents. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)