Crl. Misc. No. M-23013 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-23013 of 2010 Date of decision : 14.09.2010 Jamshed ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Ms. Monisha Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana for the respondent-State **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) A Co-ordinate Bench of this Court (Rajan Gupta, J.) while issuing notice of motion, passed the following order: - “Contends that all the offences alleged in the FIR are bailable except the one under section 506 IPC. Learned counsel submits that petitioner shall fully co-operate with the investigating agency. Notice of motion for 14.09.2010. Meanwhile, in the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer subject to the following conditions: - i) He shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required. ii) He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and iii) He shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.” Crl. Misc. No. M-23013 of 2010 -2- 2. At the every outset learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Parkash Singh has stated that as petitioner has already joined the investigation, therefore, he is no longer required for further interrogation at this stage. 3. Taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances, emanating from the record and having heard the learned counsel for the parties, having gone through the record with their valuable help and after bestowal of thoughts over the entire matter, to my mind, the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail. 4. In the event of arrest of the petitioner, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing adequate bail/surety bonds in the sum of Rs.20,000/- to the satisfaction of Arresting Officer. 5. However the petitioner is directed to make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Agency as and when required. He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. 6. Disposed of accordingly. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) Judge September 14, 2010 naresh.k