IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.23108 of 2008 Between: B. Anantha Satyanarayana Murthy, S/o. B. Narsimha Rao Attender in Mechanical Section, S.E.S.S.N. Murthy Polytechnic, Raghunadhapalem, Khammam Urban Mandal, Khammam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Director and Commissioner of Technical Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Director of Technical Education, Gaganavihar, Hyderabad. 3 The Secretary and Correspondent, S.E.S.S.N. Murthy Polytechnic, Raghunadhapalem, Khammam Urban Mandal, Khammam District. 4 The Principal, S.E.S.S.N. Murthy Polytechnic, Raghunadhapalem, Khammam Urban Mandal, Khammam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service w.e.f.03.03.2008, the date on which two months suspension period was lapsed, with all consequential beneﬁts, such as full pay and allowances, continuity of service etc., by setting aside the impugned suspension order Procds.Rc/C/Estt/2007-08, dt. 04.01.2008 of the fourth respondent by holding that the impugned action of the respondents is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Arts. 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S. K.CHINNA BABA & SREE KALA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.23108 OF 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition so as to enable the petitioner to avail the eﬀective alternative remedy of appeal before the 1st respondent- Director and Commissioner of Technical Education, A.P., Hyderabad. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, leaving liberty to the petitioner to ﬁle an appeal before the 1st respondent- Director and Commissioner of Technical Education, A. P. , Hyderabad, and, on such appeal being ﬁled, the 1st respondent shall entertain the same without raising any objection as to the limitation and dispose of the same as per law. No order as to costs. _________​__________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 23rd October, 2008. IBL