IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6987 of 2006 BIRENDRA PRASAD SAH, son of Late-Ram Prasad Sah, resident of village and P.S.-Rahul, District-Nalanda. ……..Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate-cum-District Collector, Nalanda. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer-cum-Divisional Supply Officer, Biharsharif, Nalanda. 4. The Block Development Supply, Rahul, Nalanda. ……..Respondents. ------------ 02. 07.12.2009 Petitioner has preferred this writ application against the order dated 21.08.1996 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Biharsharif cancelling the licence as well as the order dated 07.12.2001, whereby the Appellate Authority has dismissed the appeal, as the appellant has been absence since the last many times. Learned counsel submits that it could appear from the impugned order that no papers regarding the petitioner’s retail licence is available in the Office. He submits that he did not receive any show cause. It appears that against the order dated 21.08.1996, the petitioner filed his appeal in the year 1999. Again against the order dismissing the appeal in the year 2001, the petitioner has filed this writ application in 2006. As the petitioner has been lax in pursuing the case, this Court refuses to interfere with the impugned order. However the petitioner may approach the concerned authority - 2 - for his grievances. With the aforesaid observations, this writ application is dismissed. Shageer (S.P. Singh, J)