WP(C) 1134/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BK SHARMA Heard Mr. E Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also h eard Ms. R Chakraborty, learned State counsel. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direct ion to the respondents to appoint them as Fishery Demonstrator by relaxing the a ge limit fixed for such appointment. The petitioners have also challenged the ad vertisement dated 11.1.11 by which 11 (eleven) posts of Fishery Demonstrator hav e been advertised. The aforesaid prayer of the petitioners is on account of a training cour se that they had undergone during the year 1987-88 conducted by Fishery Training Institute Joysagar. Merely because of the fact that the petitioners have underg one some training in fishery, they cannot claim appointment automatically dehors the recruitment rules. From the materials on record, it appears that the petiti oners had earlier also approached this Court by filing a writ petition being WP( C) No.4414/2007 making similar prayer when the advertisement for the post of Fis hery Demonstrator was issued. The said writ petition was disposed of by holding that there is no infirmity in conducting the selection. It was provided that it would be open for the petitioners to file requisite applications for condonation of their respective ages. In view of the above, there is no infirmity in issuing the advertisement dated 11.1.11 and no direction can also be issued for appointing the petitioner s as Fishery Demonstrator. If the petitioners are overaged, as was provided earl ier in the aforesaid writ petition, it would be open for the petitioners to make appropriate representation for condoning the age. With the above observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of.