Respondents •e^.. A' '^ Sirange Bi a 3 'ksS M '•w IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. fS) No. 59 ^f/ / 2011 Petitioner : PrafullEngale S/o Late Shri Suresh Engale, Aged about 36 years, Assistant Grade-III office of Assistant Agriculture Engineer, Kanker Distirct-Kanker (C.G.) Versus ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Agriculture Departnient, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) ^ „ 2.' The Director Agriculture (Engineering) Directorate, Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.) 3.' State of Chhattisgrah, Through the Secretary General Administration Department (State Re-organization CeU) D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 4.'' State of Madhya Pradesh- Through The Secretary Agriculture Department Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) r 5. State of Madhya Pradesh - Through The Secretary General Administration Department (State Re-organization Cell) Vallab Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) ^1<S%V V ^wy^ ^A^Wc V^^c, ^'^ ••••''. ^^/y^ -^J(^O&L_ 6. Union of India - Through the SeGretary Department of Personal Public Grievance and Pension (Personal and Trainer Department) New Delhi WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTI£;LE_227OJFTHE^ONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA -sft^ HIGH CQURT OF CHHATriSCrARH AT BII^^PUR r*i • n^/CT Olrfi^ AWJK* tS'US99.i\^S3t VSU.S.AWX^SSiV^ U'A $V^UCliJ8»JP RESPONDENTS versus PrafaU Eaaale StateofChhattis) Others Sbri Subash Yadav, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Pravcen Das, Dy. G.A. &r the State/1 tQ 3, Shri. Rajeev Shrivastava, counsel for resps. 4 & 5 & Smt Snuta Ohai, counsel for resp. N0,6 on advance copy. WiaT^ T!TIONiWDERARTLCUB2^SOjrTHECOWSnTUTIO|l OF mPIA t»Vf ^ Coritention of fhe counsel for thc pctitioner is tfaat he is a pennanent resident of Madhya Pradesh and from fbe begirmiag tie is requestmg tfae respondents to allocate him to State of Madhya Pradesh instead of State of Chhattisgarh where he is presenfly worMag as Assistant Grade-IIE m fhe departnient ofagricultare. Shri Yadav submits fhat the pctitioner is faeing great hardship and siace last 11 years he is nuuung fi-om piUar to post fer gettinj favourable order but till date nottung has been achieved by hioi. Shri Pravcen Das, appearing for fhe State of Ctihattisgarh submits fhat the State of Chiiattisgarh has already considered fhe case of fhe petitioner aad has rejected the claim for bis attocatlon to the State of Madhya Piadesh. At this stage, Shri Yadav subinits that he may be permitted to withdraw fhis petition with liberty to pursue his representatioa as accordiag to him, frmn Annexure P/12, it is apparent that his case.is stBl under consideration before fhe State of Madhya Piadesh. Counsel appeariag for the fespondents have ao objection if fiie petitioner pursues his presentation before the conipeteiit aufhorily. Aceordiagly, the petition is disiaissed as witlidrawn wttti the aforesaid Uberty. i Pritinker Dhvakar Judge