IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5352 of 2010 GULDEO DEO SON OF LATE GUDAR DEO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHALA BAINGARA, P.O.- JIRAUL, P.S. HARLAKHI, DISTRICT- MADHUBANI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION MECHANICAL DIVISION, BIRPUR, SUPAUL. 3. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, SAHARSA. ----------- 2 30.03.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 30th June, 1998 from the post of Assistant Rigger, although all the retiral dues have been paid, however the part amount of the provident fund dues for the period while the petitioner was under work charge establishment has not been paid despite representation. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.2 with a copy to the respondent no.3. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)