A Q A,\^-^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR (0.0.1 WRIT PET N0. ^6 B4^2004 PETITIONER ?• ^o .^- ..-<<NA y\.,^%t> <)^^\" ^••;^\-:;^.<'" ^ ' , ^^' .^.** ..^ v^...f"' Narbada Singh, aged about 45 years, son of Late Shri Sardar Singh, Gram Sahayak, Gram Panchayat - Jainagar, Janpad Panchayat - Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.) ^^••" ^" RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. ^ State of Chhattisgarh, through : The Secretary, Department of Panchayat, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) The Director (Panchayat), Department of Panchayat - Raipur (CG) The District Collector, Distt Surguja, Ambikapur (Chhattisgarh) The Deputy Director, Zeela Panchayat, Surguja, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) The Chief Executive Officer, Zeela Panchayat - Surguja (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER / ORDERS, DIRECTION / DIRECTIONS. MI-^I^*}. j ^ XI-HC-22 '3"^ ^INId^l, ^Tl1^<l<6, (G<^l^1< 3?n^r^>T f^nW 371^1 ^)^RT^ ^f^a in '^e Ktr... w ^W<r\{ ^Klch 3ff^T "q^R ^l^oj.....M^^^h oF) ^r^T' 311^1 "^TT^H: ^rf^T 6\ c^ 26-8-2004 On a rnention bemg made, this cs Petitioner/s by Shri ^oiW /bt'^«:,^^v^"^^- State by Shri V.V.S. Murthy, ^ D>-.GA, and SKri Akhil Agrawai and Shiji Heard. The matter relates lo transfer oftH Courisel for the petitioner/s subm( effected illegally in contravention of law State counsel submitted that the| without servdng notice for demand ofjusti Having heard and considered l| opmion on the merits of the case, in Aej sen^ed if a direction is given to the petii his,/her grievances and groimds be.fore thj respondents along with a copy of the peti re.presentation being filed, the State Gove xmder the .law, shall consider and decide law as early as possible preferably withir of the representation. !f any contrave.nl notice. the same be considered on it.s o\vn Counsel fbr [he petilioner.'s pray<: any giievance of the petitioner/s reniain: available under the law. It is open to the p law. With the aforesaid observatyons. +l^id4lr1 'RTR^f ^ t^t Tf^P'< ^ ^ri^R^n^r -e is taken up. /'. Advocats General, with Shri Saush Gupt. Sandeep Dubey, Panel La\\yers. .e petitioner from the respective place. itted that the transfer ofthe pctitioner/s has been |nd policy. State counsel opposed it. petitioner/s has straight\vay filed the petition :e ana representaxion. \\Q rivai contentions, without expressing any •pmion of this Coiirt, ends of justice wiU be [oner/s to make detailed rcpresenzation raism^ State GovemmenVcompetent authont} of the tion and ihis order, within 10 davs. and on. siich tninent/competent authority of the respondents.. |:he same on its own merits m accordance with six weeks firoin the date of receipVproduction }ion of policy or guidelines is brought to tne jiiien/cs. that after the decision of the representaiion if 1. he/she niav be allowed 10 avail the remedv •fctitioner to avail the remedv available under ihe |iis petition siands disposed of. Consequently M.'W.P., ifany, a Certified copy as per pjles. Copy to State counsel for compliapce. stands disposed of Cf-^V" ^-- -y ^. c^Hs'€-fi 'n<9f^^slal6tf^ Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge