IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 9672 of 2010 Date of decision: 31.03.2010 Lakhpat Rai and another ........ Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent (s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Yogesh Goel, Advocate for the petitioners -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that complaint dated 02.03.2010 was sent to respondents No. 3 and 4 vide registered letter on 04.03.2010. However, no action has been taken on the same. In view of the above, respondent No. 3 is directed to look into the aforesaid complaint of the petitioners and take appropriate action, if need be. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge March 31, 2010 mohan