IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3358 of 1991 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT S DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- SOMA DAYA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 3358 of 1991 NOTICE SERVED for Petitioner No. 1 Mrs. Manisha L. Shah AGP for Respondent No. 1 MR HS MUNSHAW for Respondent No. 2 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 3-6 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT S DAVE Date of decision: 02/11/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. The petitioner has ventilated his grievance against the respondents since he was not paid even provisional pension for the service which he had rendered to the respondents-Authorities. The only prayer which he has made is to direct the respondents to complete the pension case of the petitioner and to forward it to the Director of Pension and Provident Fund, Khanpur, Ahmedabad. The matter was admitted by the Court by order dated 6th March 1992. 2. Today when the matter is called out for final hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, Mrs. Shah, has placed the letter dated 27th October 1993 on record of the petition which was addressed by the Section Officer of the Panchayat and the Rural Development Department, State of Gujarat, stating that the pension case of the petitioner was prepared and submitted to the concerned Authority and the pension of the petitioner is sanctioned. The letter dated 27th October 1993 is ordered to be taken on record. 3. In view of the fact that the grievance of the petitioner stands resolved, no further order is required to be passed in this matter. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. (Anant S. Dave, J.) (swamy)