..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2069 OF 2008 Amol Vitthal Garande. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.Vishwajeet Patil, Adv. for applicant. Ms.A.T.Jhaveri, APP, for State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 24th July, 2008. DATED : 24th July, 2008. DATED : 24th July, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.411 of 2007 of Nigadi Police Station, Pune. The said case is under Sections 394, 364 r/w. 34 of IPC. 3. The prosecution case is that the applicant along with other accused assaulted the driver and cleaner of a truck by means of iron scale and robbed the driver of the truck of cash which he was carrying, and thereafter they forcibly took away the truck carrying goods. The informant is the driver of the truck. ..(2).. 4. The learned Advocate for the applicant has stated that the coaccused Nilesh Nandaram Gokule has been granted bail and the case of the applicant is similar to that of coaccused Nilesh Nandaram Gokule. It is seen that bail was granted to coaccused Nilesh by the Sessions Court. This Court is not bound by the order passed by the Sessions Court. The informant has clearly mentioned name of the applicant. The offence is of a serious nature. Hence, I am not inclined to grant bail. Application for bail is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)