1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6775 OF 2005 Mr. Sajid Mohammed Ismail Furniturewala. .. Petitioner. vs. Mr. Sanjay Kachardas Mutha & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. K.R. Dhanuka with V.M. Talreja for petitioner. Mr. S.N. Chandrachud for respondents 1 to 5. CORAM : S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 12th December, 2005. P.C.: . The present petition challenges the order dated 3.9.2005 by which the learned Judge in the course of the trial has accepted certain documents which are set out in the said order. In my opinion, the said order is purely interlocutory and in the course of trial in the nature of procedural order. It is open to the petitioner to challenge the said order at the time when the appeal is filed against the final decree. I do not find any reason to 2 interfere with the said interlocutory order passed by the trial Court in the course of trial under Article 27 of the Constitution of India. Petition is dismissed accordingly. No order as to costs.