IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11785 of 2010 JAG LAL RAI, son of late Kapil Rai, resident of village- Chintamanganj, P.S.- Garakha, District- Saran…….. Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.08.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected by an order dated 9.9.2009 in Cr.Misc. No. 32155 of 2009. Whatever has been stated in this bail application and argued in support of such prayer had already been taken into consideration on the earlier occasion while rejecting the prayer for bail of the petitioner in the order dated 9.9.2009. In fact, there is no fresh material so as to reconsider the prayer for bail of the petitioner. That being so, the prayer for bail is once again rejected. However, the trial court is directed to ensure that the trial of the petitioner is expedited and completed preferably within a period of nine months from the date of receipt of this order. In the event, the trial of the petitioner 2 would not be completed within the aforementioned period of nine months, the petitioner will have a liberty to first move the trial court which would then record its reasons for not concluding the trial within the aforementioned period and only thereafter, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before this Court. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)