IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Contempt Application No. 227 of 2010 Parmarth Niketan. …..…Applicant. Versus Sanjay Agarwal and others. …...…Respondents. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate present for the petitioner. Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this contempt petition has been filed, as execution petition filed by the petitioner is not being taken up, as there is no officer posted at that place. Therefore, petitioner has no other remedy except to file contempt petition before this court. The argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner is without any force. Since execution petition could not be taken up, as no officer was posted at Kotdwar, petitioner may approach the District Judge concerned, who shall assign the execution petition to some other competent court without any delay. Contempt petition is disposed of. (Nirmal Yadav, J.) 30.11.2010 SKS