IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10528 of 2009 SHEO KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 24.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Primarily on wrong advice instead of filing of an appeal against the impugned order contained in annexure-5 petitioner filed representation before the District Magistrate, Gaya dated 12.1.2008 which is annexure-9 to the writ application. When nothing was done the petitioner filed the present writ application. In the above circumstances looking at the allegation against the then Supply Inspector etc. the Court is of the opinion that the District Magistrate will be competent authority to look into this aspect of the matter. Let the petitioner file an appropriate appeal against the order of cancellation of the license dated 20.12.2007 contained in anneure-5. Limitation, if any will be waived by the District Magistrate in view of what has been recorded in the earlier part of the order. After filing of the appeal by the petitioner the Court expects a final decision on the issue preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of the filing of the appeal. The decision of appeal will decide the future court of action against the petitioner. This writ application stands disposed of with the above direction. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)