IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2011 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 27127 of 2010(R) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. A.MUHAMMED SHAW, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O.ABDUL HAMEED,POOVANNAN VEEDU, JONAKAPURAM VALIYAKADACHERRY, KOLLAM VILLAGE, KOLLAM TALUK. * ADDL.PETITIONER P2 IMPLEADED *ADDL.P2: SELMA BEEVI, AGED 80, W/O.ABDUL HAMEED, POOVANNAN VEEDU, JONAKAPURAM, VALIYAKADACHERRY, KOLLAM VILLAGE, KOLLAM TALUK BY ADV. SRI.N.K.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAYAMKULAM. ** ADDL.R2 IMPLEADED ** ADDL.R2: STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. ADDL.P2 AND ADDL.R2 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 23/3/2011 IN IA.NO.14963/2010 IN WPC NO.27127/2010 R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.J.MOHAMMED ANZAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.27127 of 2010 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of March, 2011. JUDGMENT Petitioner is the defacto complainant in Crime No.105 of 2010 of Kayamkulam Police Station registered on 22.01.2010 for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 420, 465, 468, 471 and 205 of the Indian Penal Code (Ext.P2 is the FIR) on a complaint (Ext.P1) preferred by the petitioner alleging that the son of petitioner had entered into Annexures 2 and 3, agreements with the first accused and later, to nullify the said agreements accused 1 to 4 forged Annexure 1, agreement dated 05.01.1987. Petitioner seeks a direction to the Investigating Officer to expedite investigation and submit final report as early as possible. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that investigation of the case is almost complete and that submission of final report was delayed since in the meantime the son of petitioner filed a complaint to the Deputy Superintendent of Police concerned alleging inadequacy in the investigation. 2. The request of learned counsel for petitioner is only to expedite filing of the final report. Having regard to the circumstances, the Officer investigating Crime No.105 of 2010 of Kayamkulam Police Station is directed to WP(C) No.27127/2010 2 expedite the investigation and submit final report as early as possible. I make it clear that I have not expressed any opinion regarding the merit of allegations in the complaint. Petition is disposed of with the above direction. THOMAS P.JOSEPH, Judge. cks