1 186.11-ao IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 186 OF 2011 Shri Devendra Jagalal Singh. ... Appellant. V/s. The Municipal Corporationof Greater Mumbai. ... Respondents. Shrishail Sakhare for the appellant. Ms.K.K.Soran for the respondent. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATED : 29th September 2011. P.C. : Since the challenge raised in this appeal from order is to the ad-interim order passed by the trial Court refusing to grant interim relief during the pendency of the notice of motion, this appeal can be conveniently disposed of by directing the trial Court to dispose of notice of motion expeditiously. 2. It is pointed out that this Court vide order dated 7th March 2011 has directed the parties to maintain status-quo. The order dated 7th March 2011 shall remain operative until disposal of the pending notice of motion by the trial Court. 2. The trial Court is, thus, directed to dispose of Notice of 2 186.11-ao Motion No.239/2011 in L.C.Suit No.201/2011 as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within twelve weeks from today after extending opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned. 3. Appeal from order stands disposed of accordingly. In view disposal of appeal from order, pending civil application does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly. (R.M.BORDE, J.)