IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9553 of 2009 UPENDRA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 17.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that finding the death of the deceased due to blood dysentery, final form was submitted recommending the prosecution under sections 182 and 211 IPC. Protest was to reply the recommendation and cognizance also is taken but ignoring the material collected in course of investigation, refusal of petitioner’s anticipatory bail, in my view also is not justified. Prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Mahnar P.S.Case No.68/1990 (C.I. 1251/2003/Tr.No. 1209/08, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- divisional Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI