HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS&VtH AT BELASPUft Writ Petition (S) No. 2741 of Z007 Peti'tionere ¥- 1. Utt'am Kumar NagwaBhi S/o 5hri Chitar Singh Thakur Age about 42 years, U.O.T., 6ovt. High School, Kor-asi, Block- Aswy. Distt. - Raipur (C.6.) 2. Ram Kumar Baghel 5/o Late Shri Bise Lal Baghel Age about 42 years, U.&.T., ©ovt. Middle School, Amlidih, Block- Bharsiwa. Oistt.- Raipur (C.5.) 3. Bhupendra Nayak S/o Shri Sanf Ram Nayak Age about 39 years, U.D.T., 6ovt. Hr. 5ec. School, Mondhar, Block- bhwsiwa, bistt.- Raipur (C.G.) 4. M.K. Sirmour S/o Shri K.C. Sirmour Age about 39 years, Lecturer, 6<wt. Sirls Hr. Sec. School, Shonti Nagcr, Oistt.- Raipur (C.G.) 5. Oinesh Kumar Sahu 5/o 5hri Lakhan Lal Sahu Age about 39 years, U.&.T., J.R. bani 6ovt. fiirls Hr. Sec. School, Saryoy Ncgar, Dtett.- Raipur (C.®.) Distt. Rdpur (C.6.) 6. Smt. Rita Luthro W/o Shri Anit Luthra Age about 51 years, U.&.T., 6ovt. High School, &umart<rai< Oistt.- Raipur (C.©.) 7. Smt. Neerja Tiwari (Mishra) W/o Shri R.O. Vaishnoy Age about 46 years, U.&.T., ffovt. Middle Schoot, Purena, Bhilai-3, Bhilai, Distt.- Oui^ (C.6.) 8. Smt. 5angeeta Anum W/o Shri H.K. Anum Age about 44 years, U.D.T., @wt. Girls Hr. School, Shanti Nagar, t>istt.- Rolpur V.e.) 9. Smt. Itohini Madhukar W/o Shri B.5, Joshi Aged 42 years. U.&.T., 6ovt. Middle School, Nimora, Abhanpw, Oistt.- Raipir (C.6.) 10. Smt. Vidyo Nigam W/o Shri Kailash Nigam Age about 41 years, U.D.T., ffovt. Hr. Sec. 5chool, SoB'anqaon, t:>iStt^. Roipur (C.6.) w^^ "•^f" ^. 11. Smt. Romula Ekka (Before Mar-ry Romula KerKetta) W/o Shri P.A.K. AKka Age about -40 years, U.I5.T., @ovt Hr. Sec, School, Simga, Distt.- Raipur (C.6.) 12. Smt. Emelda Toppo W/o 5hri Ajit Kumor Toppo Age obouf 39 yeors, U.b.T. 6ovt. Hi9h School, Dondekdla, Distt. Raipur (C.6.) 13. Smt. lla Thakur &/o Late 5hri M.S. Thakur Age about 39 years, U.D.T, J.R. Dani 6ovt. Sirls Hr. Sec. School, Shanti Nagar-, bistt.- Roipur (C.6.) 14. Smt. Jyoti Awadhiya (Before Morricge Jyoti Soraf) W/o Shri Rcyin Awadhiyo Age obout 38 years, U.&.T. 6ovt. Hr. 5ec. School, Shanti Nagw, Distt.- Raipur (C.6.) 15. Smt. Uttara Dhruw W/o 5hri B.K. Ohruw Age dbout 38 yews, U.D.T., Sant K.R. 6ovt QMs Hr. Sehool, Katora Talab, Distt.- Raipu- (C.6.) 16. Smt. Aryano bubey W/o 5hri Sunil Dubey Age obout 37 yews, U.&.T., J.N. Pandey 6ovt. Hr. Sec. School, Purani Basti, bistt- Raipur (C.6.) 17. Smt. Victoriya Kindo W/o 5hri Probhu Kindo Age about 36 years, U.D.T., 5ant K.R. 6ovt. Sirls Hr. School, Kator-a Talda, Ustt.- Roipur (C.fi.) 18. Smt. N, Mishra W/o Shri <4.K. Mishra Age about 43 yecrs, U.&.T., J.R.N. 6ovt. Hr. 5ec. • School, Rmigaon, Distt.- Raipur (C.6.) 19. Smt. Kalpana Jha (Before Marriage Kalpana Dubey) W/o Shri Akshay Prakash Jha Age about 39 yeu-s, U.&.T., 6ovt. Hr. Sec. School, Hirmi Katora Talda, bistt;- Raipur (C.@.) 20. Smt. Ratna Mishra W/o Shri Vijay Kimar Mishra Age about 42 yeurs, U.&.T., ©ovt.Hr.Sec. School, Raipura, t)istj^ (C.S.) f- 21. Ku. Archna Dubey W/o Shri H.P. Dubey Age dbout 38 year's, U.D.T., J.R.N. 6ovt. Hr. Sec. School, RonigaCT), Distt.- Raipu- (C.©.) Verais V-- Respondents 1. State ©overnment of Chhatti^arh, 7hrou9h Secretary, Education bepartment, E>.K.S. Bhowon, Raipur (C.6.) 2. Oirector of Public Instruction bistt.-Raipur (C.6.) 3. District Educaton Officer Oistt- Raipur (C.6.) 4. District Education Officer Oistt.- Ourg (C.ff.) Writ petitton under Article 226 of the Cwistilution of India Sif^le Bench: Hwi'bie Mr. Justice Satish K. ^gnihotri. Present; Mr. Somkant Venno, Advocote for the petitioners. Mr. Arvind Odbey, Panet Lawyer for the State/responderrfts. ORDER (Possed on 7"' Ony of Moy, 2007) 1. The question of l(»v involved herein is asto whether ttie petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of jnitial appointment' or from the date of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appea'ing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts ond question of law involved in the present writ petition ar-e the same as to that of in W, P. (S) No. 1463/2006 (Aeman Jain vs. The State &wemment of Chhatl'isgarh & another), which was disposed of vide order dated 10.11.20)6. iff ?• 3. In view of the above-stated submissions made by leamed counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish KAgmhotri , Judge „ JL 3-