RFA No. 85 of 2005 and RSA No. 352 of 2009. RFA No. 85 of 2005: 19.8.2011 Present: Appellant in person with Mr. B.C. Verma, Advocate. Respondent with Mr. V.S. Chauhan and Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocates. RSA No. 352 of 2009: Appellant with Mr. J.R. Poswal, Advocate. Mr. V.S. Chauhan and Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocates learned counsel for respondents No. 1 & 3 with respondent No.1 in person. None for respondent No.2 though served. On the last date of hearing (4.8.2011), a common order was passed in these matters, which reads as under:- “It appears that before the matter is taken up for admission in case efforts are made the inter se dispute between the parties can be amicably settled. Accordingly, list the appeal for settlement on 19th August, 2011. The parties to appear in person or through their duly authorized agents competent to enter into compromise, if arrived at. List along with connected RFA No. 85 of 2005 on 19th August, 2011.” Today, the parties present and their learned counsel state that the matters stand compromised. Statements of the appearing parties recorded separately, which shall form part of this order. In view of compromise between the parties, both the suits filed by Shri Mukesh Kumar (respondent in RFA No. 85 of 2005 and respondent No.1 in RSA No. 352 of 2009) and Shri Nanak Chand Garg (appellant in the aforesaid RFA No. 85 of 2005 and RSA No. 352 of 2009), out of which the present appeals arise shall stand dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the impugned judgments dated 28.2.2005 passed by the learned Additional District Judge (Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court), Solan, District Solan, H.P. in case No. 51 FT/1 of 2004/2003, Mukesh Kumar versus N.C. Garg and dated 12.10.2007 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Arki, District Solan, H.P. in Civil Suit No. 111/1 of 2003, Nanak Chand Garg versus Mukesh Kumar and others as affirmed by the learned Additional District Judge, Solan, H.P. vide judgment dated 22.11.2008 passed in Civil Appeal No. 1-S/13 of 2008, Nanak Chand Garg versus Mukesh Kumar and others shall stand set aside. Consequently, the decretal amount of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand) deposited by the appellant herein, Shri Nanak Chand Garg, shall be liable to be refunded to him. The amount be remitted to his bank account particulars whereof shall be supplied by his learned counsel in the Registry. In view of the above, both the appeals being RFA No. 85 of 2005, Nanak Chand versus Mukesh Kumar and RSA No. 352 of 2009, Nanak Chand Garg versus Mukesh Kumar & others, shall stand disposed of accordingly. (V.K. Sharma) Judge. August 19, 2011. (cr)