IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.622 OF 2003 APPEAL NO.622 OF 2003 APPEAL NO.622 OF 2003 ............................................................. ............................................................. ............................................................. Office Notes,Office Office Notes,Office Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, memorandum of Coram, memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s appearances,Court’s appearances,Court’s Court’s Court’s Court’s or or or orders or directions orders or directions orders or directions Judge’s Judge’s Judge’s orders orders orders & Registrar’s orders. & Registrar’s orders. & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. ............................................................. ............................................................. Mr.G.S.Godbole for the Appellant Mr.S.S.Patwardhan for the Res.No.4. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : DECEMBER 19,2007. : DECEMBER 19,2007. : DECEMBER 19,2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Shri Godbole appearing for the Appellants who are the original plaintiffs. A suit filed by the Appellants-Plaintiffs for injunction was dismissed by the trial court by holding that the Appellants have failed to prove that they were in possession of the suit property on the date of institution of the suit. The decree passed by the trial court has been confirmed in the Appeal. 2. After having heard the learned Advocate for the Appellants I find no reason to interfere with the concurrent findings recorded by both the courts below. The Courts below have considered the evidence on record and especially the fact that the premises are not in existence and acquisition of the property has been completed. No substantial question of law arises. Second Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE