HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR CORAM: APPLICANT RESPONDENTS 1 ^^. Humble Shri Sunil Kumar Sinha & Hon'ble Shri Radhe Shvam SharmaJJ. M.C.C. N0. 777/2011 Prakash Chand Maloo (Jain) son of Late S.M. Jain, aged about 51 years, R/o D-35/1, Devendra Nagar, Raipur VERSUS Union of India through the Secretary Ministry of Finance, Deptt. Of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi. 1a Central Board of Direct Taxes through Chairman, Ministry of Finance, North Block, New Delhi. 2. Director General of Income Tax, (Investigation) Ayakar Bhavan, Hosangabad Road, Bhopal (M.P.). 3. The Director of Income Tax, (Investigation) Ayakar Bhavan, Hosangabad Road, Bhopal (M.P.). 4. The Joint Director of Income Tax, (Investjgation) Central Revenue Buildjng, Civil Line, Raipur (C.G.). 5. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Civil Line, Raipur (C.G.). 6. The Assistant Commissioner of lncomeTax-2(1). AN APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION Appearance: Mr. M.K. Sinha, Advocate forthe applicant. Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate for respondents 2 to 4. SUNILKUMARSINHAJ. ORAL ORDER (24.11.2611) i Heard. Applicant is seeking restoration of W.A. No. 44/2011, which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 21.10.2011 as no one appeared .^'. ..•.^'~:'--:^ /i v ^3"—^1 X. .. ~W -^ -^ // ^•v. '•^'"'"^- "'^^^y:' M.C.C.N0.777/a)11 on behalf of the applicant when the above writ appeal was taken up for hearing by this Court. On due consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and the grounds taken in the restoration application, we are satisfied that the absence of learned counsel for the appiicant on 21.10.2011, when W.A. No. 44/2011 was taken up for hearing was based on bonafide grounds. Accordingly, M.C.C. No. 777/2011 is allowed and W.A. No. 44/2011 is restored to its original number. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Rahul Sd/- R.S. Sharma Judge