THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.21563 OF 2011 Dated: 29.07.2011 Between : 1. Barla Sayanna … Petitioner And 1. The State Bank of Hyderabad, rep. by Its Branch Manager, Metpally Branch, Metpally Proper and Mandal, Karimnagar District and another. … Respondents THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.21563 OF 2011 ORDER : As could be seen from the material placed before this Court, notice under Section 13 (2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short, ‘SARFAESI Act’), was followed by the possession notice under Section 13 (4) of the SARFAESI Act and now the impugned auction notice has been issued proposing to sell the property in question. Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act provides for an efficacious alternative remedy to the aggrieved party by any of the measures referred to under Section 13 (4) of the SARFAESI Act. Hence if aggrieved, it is for the petitioner to work out the said remedy available before the Debts Recovery Tribunal having jurisdiction in the matter and the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot be maintained. Accordingly the Writ Petition is dismissed as not maintainable. No costs. _____________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt. 29.07.2011 gbs