WP(C) 9147/2004 BEFORE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. P. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. H. Rahman, learned Addl. Solicitor General of India. The grievance raised in this writ petition is the purported inaction on the part of the respondents to make appointment to the post of Technician in All India Radio pursuant to the selection conducted in terms of Annexure-3 advertis ement published in the Employment News in November, 2002. According to the respo ndents prior approval towards conducting the selection was not conducted. Howeve r, this Court in its order dated 09.01.07 observed that such irregularity was cu rable. Accordingly, Mr. H. Rahman, learned Addl. Solicitor General of India was requested to obtain instruction in the matter. It has been brought to my notice that by letter dated 05.07.07 opinion o f the Director has been conveyed that the candidature of the petitioners and oth er similarly placed candidates be considered for appointment against the vacanci es cleared for ADRP 2002-03 subject to fulfillment of the requisite conditions as per the recruitment rules. By the said letter a request was made to convey th e action taken report at the earliest. Since the respondents have taken a conscious decision to proceed with th e matter relating to the selection by way of considering the case of the petitio ners along with other similarly situated persons, the writ petition is disposed of providing that the respondents shall do the needful in this regard as early a s possible preferably within three months. Writ petition stands disposed of.