IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21419 of 2010 SK.MURSHID, SON OF SK. SAKOOR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 342, 504, 379 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the First Information Report but there is no allegation of assault alleged against him. It has further been submitted that final report was submitted in the matter with regard to the petitioner but the court concerned disagreed with the same and took cognizance. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 18.5.2010 and has no criminal antecedents, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in Amdabad P.S. Case No. 15 of 2007 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the 2 petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)