IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P. (s y No. (3% / 2010 PETITIONER : /Sourendra Nath Das, S/o Late D.N. Das, aged about 39 years, R/o 43/190, Near Hardeo Mandir, Brahampuri, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS . /‘ (k, 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through — The Secretary Department of Forest, D.K.s. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. / The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, rArenya Bhavan Medical f7 College Road, Raipur (C.G.) 3. ( The Conservator of forest At the Office of Raipur District A Raipur ( C.G. ) 4. The Divisional Forest officer Forest Division — East —Raipur District— Rajpur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS ‘7' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 [227 OF THE ONSTITUTION OF INDIA - W 4.3L m§m¢$ Wgyf7$é/ .9... E20 . anéwm (W) mawm mmmmet mam£fwm Hensnéam $ai%nanéw SB: Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 5.3.2010 Shri Ajit Singh, counsel for the petitioner. Shn' N. Naha Roy, Pan Lawyer for the StatE/respondents, on advance copy. Case of the petitioner i ‘fhat he was initially appointed as daily wage V’Vorker in the ffice of DiviSional Forest O$ce13 Division— Raipur in the year 990. But later on, he was removed from the work in the year 199 . Petitioner has come to know that Siate Authority have taken a policy decision by issuing Circular dated 5.3.2008 {Annexure P- ) to consider cases of daily wage employees for regulaiization. According to learned ounsel for the petitioner, though several representations have b en made, they have not so far been decided. Learned counsel for e petitioner relies upon direction issued by this Court on 29 1.2009 in W.P.(S) No. 545l2009, wherein under similar circ stances, petition was disposed of with direction for consideratio . Accordingly, this petitio is finally disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh re resentation before the respondent No.3 raising all grievances aised in this petition. On such representation being made, e same shall be considered and mam (W) W ww ....I..I.I.I.I....I...I........I..I. mzo Www ammstm mmmmat mm#wm _. 2/ $Wmléa1 decided by the respondent Nc.3 on its own merits in the light of Circular of Annexure P—l daud 5.3.2008, Within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt 3f the representation. Sd/- \\ Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge \