c . ^-- o s BEFORE THE HON'BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l WRIT PETITION (C) N0. ^SZ-J^/ 2011 PETITIONER ^$^. v.^-^::^^u^?"^...--"°:°. ^.^^;,,^-^^7/ '^e&.-""°"^ '* RESPONDENTS .^^"" ... ^"^ .^^^ ^'•^y '^^^'^ ^ : Chandrabhan Agrawal, S/o. Late Shri Ramdhan Agrawal, Aged about 50 years, R/o. Lailunga, District - Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) 3. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR PETmONER WRTT PETmON (C) No. 7325 of2011 Chandrabhan Agrawal. RESPQNDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRTT PETTTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Sattsh K. Asmhotri, J. Present: Shri Sourabh Dangi, Advocate fbr the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 1 and 3. Shri Amn Sao, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. ORDER (Passed on 07th day ofDecember, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioner submits that the impugned notice dated 25.11.2011 (Annexure P/l), for demolition of the alleged unauthorized constmction raised by the petitioner, has been witfadrawn by the respondent authorities. Thus; nothing sur^ives for adjudication and this petition has become infmctuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side do not controvert the above submission. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become mfiructuous. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Anut