IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8571 of 2009 Ramanand Yadav @ Ram Nandan Pd.Yadav, son of Sri Jageshwar Yadav, resident of village Malahi, P.S. Atari, District Gaya Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 06.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Sections 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code against one Ramashish Yadav is said to have impersonated for the petitioner in physical test for appointment on the post of constable in the category of Home Guards. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is not named in the First Information Report, but has been identified as the one for whom Ramashish Yadav participated in the physical test by the Dy.S.P. in the supervision note . In the light of such fact, it is submitted that the findings of the Dy.S.P. in the supervision against the petitioner should not be looked into and he should be admitted to the privilege of bail in the event of arrest. I regret not to accept such submission, as admittedly the petitioner is Home Guard, who was applicant for the post of constable and for him, Ramashish Yadav participated in the physical test. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to admit the 2 petitioner to the privilege of bail in the event of arrest. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)