1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 94 OF 1992 Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. Bombay. The Government of India Enterprise, having their office at Telephone House, V.S.Marg, Bombay-400 028, through their Zonal Office being General Manager (South), Telephone Bhavan, Colaba, Bombay-400 005. ...Plaintiff. Vs. Shri Dilipkumar B. Pancheriwala, having his office at C/o. Dinesh Kumar Motilal, 384-M, Kalbadevi Road, Bombay -400 002. ...Defendant. Ms. Jyoti R. Thakkar for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 9th OCTOBER, 2009. ORAL JUDGMENT:- 1 The suit is for recovery of Rs.65,800/- (Rupees sixty five thousand eight hundred only). The claim arises in respect of the bill pertaining to 2 telephone charges, in respect of the telephone connection granted to the Defendant. Though demanded was never paid. None appeared for the Defendant, though served. The Plaintiffs have filed an affidavit of service. An Affidavit of claim is also filed on record along with the documents. 2 In the circumstances, as the case is made out and as there is no denial or dispute to the averments made, the suit is decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). However, the rate of interest is restricted to 9% p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till the realization. 3 The decree be drawn accordingly. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)