-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.193 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.193 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.193 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.599 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.599 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.599 OF 2005 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.Umesh Mankapure for the Applicant Mr.A.S.Shitole, A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : NOVEMBER 28,2006. : NOVEMBER 28,2006. : NOVEMBER 28,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocate for the Applicant and the learned A.P.P. for state. The Advocate for the Applicant submitted that no case is made out of commission of an offence under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code on admitted facts. 2. The Applicant was not enlarged on bail during the pendency of the trial. The substantive sentence is of seven years. 3. Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, no case is made out for enlarging the Applicant on bail as of today. Application is rejected. Hearing of the Appeal is expedited. Liberty to file private paper book. -2- JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE