1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4823 OF 2005 The Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai .. Petitioners Vs. M/s.Kavita Construction Co & Ors.. Respondents Mr.A.J.Bhor i/b R.A.Malandkar for the petitioners CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL J. J. J. DATED : 26TH JULY, 2006 DATED : 26TH JULY, 2006 DATED : 26TH JULY, 2006 P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. Examined the report filed by the learned principal Judge of the Bombay City Civil court. In view of the fact that the learned principal Judge of the City Civil Court is taking steps to recover the Court Fees on Vakalatnama filed by the advocates appearing for the Bombay Municipal Corporation, nothing survives in the petition. 3. The learned counsel for the Bombay Municipal Corporation states that the court fees 2 not paid on the Vakalatnama filed by the advocate for the Bombay Municipal Corporation would be made good from the Municipal fund of B.M.C. Statement accepted. This sufficiently protects the interest of the Revenue i.e. the State Government. ( SHRI J.N.PATEL, J ) ( SHRI J.N.PATEL, J ) ( SHRI J.N.PATEL, J )