HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.5559 of 2011 Dated 19.7.2011 Between: Jadala Vinod. …Petitioner. And: The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Additional Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another. …Respondents. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.5559 of 2011 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. 2. The allegations in the F.I.R. do show that this petitioner assaulted the defacto complainant who is a lady by touching her sari also. The allegations do disclose the offences mentioned in the F.I.R. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner however pointed out that there is a landlord and tenant dispute and in this regard, a suit has been filed by the petitioner, and the defacto complainant thereafter came up with this criminal complaint as a counter blast. These are disputed questions of fact which cannot be decided in this petition. In the circumstances, the relief of quashing the F.I.R. is rejected. 4. It is represented that the petitioner is having his own business and he has no previous crime record. In the circumstances of the case, the police are directed to keep in view Section 41 of Cr.P.C. before taking a decision about his arrest. 5. Accordingly, this Criminal petition is disposed of. _________________________ Justice N.RAVI SHANKAR Dated 19.7.2011 *Dvs. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.5559 of 2011 Dated 19.7.2011 *Dvs.