W,_“‘3, (gG‘é BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASDLLR W,P.N0. 3;éj g [2003. / APPROPRIATE THE NATURE FOR ISSUANCE OF NATURE. MANDAMUSz OF WRITI CERTIORARI OIgDER OF OR THE [ OR AND CONSTITUTION OF DIRECTION ANY OTHER OF IN x .Nx_ \R\ PETITIONER Leelawati, wife of Rajbo, caste Mahkool, / resident aged of 'Dumamara, about &c years, Tah Dhar:amjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh. VERSUS N RESPONDENTS l. The State of f, *‘tww of Chhattisgarh, Raigarh through (Chham'sgarh). : Dlstmct Collector, . . é} §\‘gt .‘\_§§' 'Q Q ..... f' Kanwar, Roop Smgh, . son of Shrl . Ramsal . $ .v 5\\"‘0‘35-” y‘ “,v‘ ek (0G9 Tah. Dharam‘ai resident J garh of : Distt. Dumarnara, Raigarh ‘3’‘ Q3ETITION UNDER ARTICLE ’1' /‘ / HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP. No, 3§63 9f 2003 -SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Shri Sankaip JayasWal, Advocate for the peb’iioner. Shri Utkarsh Verma, Deputy Govt Advocate for the respondent No.1. m ' (Passed on this 26‘" day of Febtualy, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the peu'tioner. on instruoo'on. seeks for permission of mis Coun to withdraw this petition, with iiMrty to rmrt to the appropriate forum for altemative statutory remedy under the provisions of the Land Revenue Code. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the other side has no objection. 3. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty. No order as to costs. Petitioner Leelawati Versus Respondente The Shte of Chhauisgarh and another