IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34332 of 2009 1. MRS. MADHURI DEVI, WIFE OF SRI VIJAY PRAKASH 2. VIJAY PRAKASH @ VIJAY PRAKASH YADAV, SON OF LATE BALDEO PRASAD BOTH RESIDENT OF MOHANPUR, PUNAICHAK BEHIND SHARMA LODGE, P.O. AND P.S. SHASTRI NAGAR, DISTRICT PATNA. ---- PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. ARUN KUMAR, RESIDENT OF N. 1302 UDAY GIRI APARTMENT, BUDH MARG, PATNA. ---- OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 3 15.4.2010 Both the parties are now not litigating with respect to Sachiwalaya P.S. Case No. 68 of 2009 in view of the fact that the informant has recognized the marriage of his daughter although it was against his wishes. The Delhi High Court has already granted protection to the husband and wife namely Rohit Kumar and Arunima Kumari. The petitioners before this Court are parents of Rohit Kumar. The police has submitted final form. In view of the aforesaid fact, it would not be in the interest of justice to pursue this case and the Chief Judicial Magistrate should pass appropriate orders accepting the final form. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)