IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15257 of 2011 Deepak Kumar son of Sri Jaynath Singh of village Satjora p.o. Satjora Bazar P.S. Panapur, Saran, Chapra …Petitioner Versus 1. The Union Of India through the Secretary Union of India, Home Department, N. Delhi 2. The Director General, CRPF, Lodhi Road, CGO Complex N. Block, N. Delhi 3. The Inspector General CRPF, Bihar Sector, Patna 4. The D.I.G. of Police, Group Centre CRPF, Muzaffarpur, Bihar. 5. The Commandant, Recruitment Board, G.C. Muzaffarpur, Bihar …Respondents ----------- 02. 13.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Solicitor General for the Respondent- Union of India and its officials. Petitioner was an applicant for the post of Constable, G.D.(Male) pursuant to the advertisement issued by the authorities of the Central Reserve Police Force (for short ‘CRPF’). It is the case of the petitioner that he applied whereafter he was summoned and was subjected to physical eligibility test followed by written test whereat he was declared successful. The petitioner was thereafter subjected to medical fitness test which was conducted on 07.01.2011 whereat he was found medically unfit as he was held suffering from cubitus valgue. It is the stand of the petitioner that an appeal is required to be filed thereagainst after obtaining medical fitness certificate. Accordingly the petitioner got himself examined by the Assistant Civil Surgeon, Primary Health Centre, Bhojpur who found him medically fit and issued fitness certificate contained in 2 Annexure-2 whereafter he filed appeal. The respondent by a communication contained in Annexure-3 directed the petitioner to appear on 03.03.2011 for his review medical test/examination. It is the case of the petitioner that he appeared at the review medical test by a Board of doctors who again found him medically unfit. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Review Medical Board consisted of the doctors who had earlier examined him and declared him medically unfit. The petitioner in these circumstances, made a representation before the Director General, CRPF, N. Block CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, N. Delhi (respondent no.2) as contained in Annexure-4 which has remained unattended. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if this Court directs disposal of the aforesaid representation by the concerned respondent in accordance with law. Learned Assistant Solicitor General, in view of aforesaid stand taken by the petitioner, submits that the matter may be disposed of in those terms. Having heard the parries and on going through the pleadings on record, this Court is satisfied that the present application be disposed of by the following order: Let the petitioner file a detailed representation before the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, CRPF, Muzaffarpur (respondent no.4) detailing his grievance annexing therewith a copy of the present order within four 3 weeks from today whereafter the said respondent shall consider and dispose of the representation in accordance with law. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )