^ G^ ys: IN_TH_E_ H0N00RABLE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT_OP_jy@ICATURE AT BIIASPOR. WRIT PETITXON N0. ^-^'-?J /2002 PETITIONERS <^"\. ^s^-" ^^^••" 1 ,,^y . ^'.& " 1. Raghunandan Prasad verma S/o. Eirtu Ram verma ageel 49 year (L.B.T.) Prlmary school Matary Samlcul'Kendara Bhawarmara» Tahsil Bandllohara» Bistt.Durg (c.G.) M.R. Salame S/o Mangalu Rara Salatae aged 62 year (H.M.) Qovt. Midil SchQOl Bhawannara Tahsll - Bcandilohara Distt. ourg (c.o») 0- VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. 2. State of chhattisgarh, Through; it's prin61pal Seeretary Dspart- asit of Sehool Baucation Mantra- laya, Raipur(chhattlsgarh). Additional Secretary»D%>artment of School Bducatlon Mantralaya, Ralpur, (chhattisgarh). District Edueatlon officer, District; Durg (ctihattisgarh). Sankul in-eharge/t'rincipal, Govt. Higher Seconiaery Sehool Bhawarmara, P.0. Bfaawarmara Tah. Dondilohara, Blstt. Durg (c.G.). jNRXT P_BCITJ:5N_SNDSR_ARTICEa 226 QF/THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 3. 4. XI-HC-22 's^ '^Wv\it, 9-Aww, hwvy. NIICTI «)*«<»>,.fc?.;.?.:....li^3. •M ai^I^iT !<•(!.<* 3i6w 5t)*t 'yf?a .-j- ^ aii^r tsiTWdfpi 01.04.2003 Shri Raj Kaiaal Singh, coLJnsel for-the petitioner. State bv Shri Ranbir Singlli, Govt. Advocate Hearcl. Sy this writ petitlon Constitution of India, petitid commanding fhe respondents tc which has been replaced by the Petitioner subniits that tjhe State of M.P. after due consideration introduced the Satikul svstem of 1997 and gave powers to ttie Prmcipals who that they can miderstand and teachers. The teachers are well and the grievance of the teachu^g their bUls etc., are redressedl promptly in an auiicable manner. Now the Staie of Chljattlsgarh has abolished the ..jSaakiil System and introduced i=i>i«ii'i'41'i t|W<'<T'^feA<R<'(i(i< •^?^OT-St^ kl Lmder Artlcle 226 of th( }ier prays for a direction reinstate the Saiikul System ^>ld system of ffae year 1987. re the Saakul-m Charge so the di s of the in touch vvith the Principles g staff regarding clearing of the old svstem of svstem of [IIE^^<a^ XIWB-S2 ^^ •<)t<l)d*l, !9iftu<w, i^iawy s^y ira^ fKKII aiHKh"""""""""""""""""""""'^ 200 •ISre^" sn^i^i Ki'll* Sf^V sft^i^ ^t^d 311^51 TOIIW ^Hita -t 1987 and the powers yest^l in Principles have been transfeiTed to Block Education loaded. It is subniitted that teachers to rush to the ofdce 'edressal of thelr grievances, vyastage of theii' tmie and mon the uiterest of the teachers and subruitted that Sanki.il Vyava svstein of 1987 that has been order. The petiUoner has not sut raised any deniand of justicd rushed to this court for redres^l ofits grievance. Having considered the fai case and m.aterial on record, en] the petitioner inakes a detalled <fti<iitl'!lft*T *l^^f "^^^ <^i^K ^?3lpOT 3(1^1 Ofilcers who- are alreadv nwrk it would be dlfficult for the bf Block Education Office for which noi oiiiy amounts to 5V, but would adversely affect students as well- It is further itha is still better than the kbolished bv an unreasonable mitted any representation nor before the authorities and ct.s and circumstances of t.he ds ofjustice would be served if representation alongivith copy .[''fli^i^ ^i' XJ-HC-22 '3^ •<11<11C1<1, ®til«'IS,iai<11'My an^r w^ ^-c- wvwn vhwea I^^I' sii^rqsr ft-fi'* sn^r ^MN? •Mf?a ^il'ilftfTtft'f W*r^ff "^ t^-<<?l <fyi^l< ^3!S:OT317^r sgis»E*"i' /M of this writ petition before tjhe competeiit authorit^. redressal of its grievance. Let the petitioner raak^ a detailed representation alongwith a copy of this order withtn nvo weeks from the dat order aiid on such a representaljion being filed, the same shall be considered and decided as within 3 weeks froin the date o: adverae order is passed and aggrieved, he may challenge the This petltion is disposed q aforesaid. Consequently, M.W.fl stand disposed of. C.C. as oer rules. tieforc respondent no.l aiid 2 of recelpt of a copy of this eaiiy as possible preferably representation. in case any |the petitioner thereby feels same. f with tlie observatlon/libem' J849/03 and I.A.NQ.8525/03 A Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge