IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29266 of 2009 1. SHEELA DEVI 2. Surendra Singh Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 14.10.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the application against petitioner no.2, inasmuch as he has been arrested during the pendency of the application. Accordingly, the application against petitioner no.2 is dismissed as withdrawn. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that love affair or any kind of the act of her son has been made for accusation of the petitioner. Statement of the girl after recovery is nothing more than influence of her parents otherwise several letters are there written by the victim girl to her son and his act was also mentioned about teasing the girl earlier to her kidnapping. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner no.1 is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Tariyani P.S. Case No. 13 of 2009, above named petitioner no. 1 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount 2 each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Seohar at Sitamarhi subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)