IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3927 OF 2006 Ashok Indravadan Mehta ..Petitioner. Vs. Usha Sudhir Parekh .. Respondent. ... Ms. Ranjana Parikh for the Petitioner. CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 19th June, 2006. P.C. : In my view, the interference of this Court under Article 227 is not warranted since the appropriate course of action for the Petitioner will be to have a witness summons issued to the electricity company for production of the bills relating to the suit premises for the relevant period. In the event that such an application is made before the Trial Judge, it is needles to add that the Learned Trial Judge shall deal with the application in accordance with law. The Petition is dismissed.