(1) ^> t IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G^ W.P. fS^ N0. ^\^ /2008 PETITIONER ^\^ ^^^ ^\v"\^ 'G-.: ^^ \^ RESPONDENTS Shyam Kumar Patel, S/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal Patel, Aged about 35 years, Assistant Teacher, Government Primary School, Kolihapali, Block- Raigarh, District-Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ,.2. District Education Officer, Raigarh (C.G.) ,3. Block Education Officer Raigarh, District-Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA ,C—78 3Ti't^T ^T ^fW 7t8n ^?^i sD^^ *<iNaa ^»*iim w^ '^PTI^P?, ^til<-i'li^, f^ro^; ^.^.^.^.......^^^ ^?T 'q^T (^Gli^^) ^HWH^^i^T S.B: HON'BLE JUSTICE MR. PfttTINKER DIWAKER 03-08-2009: Shri Anil Mourya, counset Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel ^rthepetitioner. Ljawyer for the State. With the consent of the par^ies, the matter is heard finally. Counsel for the petitioner v^ants to withdraw the present petitton with liberty to file representatpon according to him the identicat m4tt@ps this Court and the petitioner in l^is authorities concerned for grantingl similar responden^s/State Counsel for the Is not in a position to make any the petitioner is covered by the identical writ petitions. He how< make a representation to the decided strictly in accordance wit(i Accordingly, the petition is| same is expected to be decided period of four months from the dal ^Brf^ft:?T HjH^lT ^ fe^l TN^H iT^Rm^T^T before respondent No. 2 as have already been decided by representation woutd apprise the relief; submits that at this stage he fetatement as to whether thQ case of jarder passed in the aforementioned iver submits that let the petitioner tespondent No. 2 which woutd be law. dismissed as withdrawn wtth (iberty as aforesaid. The representatiofi if flled by the petitioner within a period of one month from the datje of receipt of copy ofthts order, the jby respondent No. 2 within a further |e of its receipt. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge