IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.21 OF 2006 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.21 OF 2006 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.21 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1095 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.1095 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.1095 OF 2006 Vimantlal Hamal Ekta Sanghatna ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.R.D.Suryawnashi for the Petitioner. Mrs.P.H.Kantharia, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- :- :- B.H.MARLAPALLE & B.H.MARLAPALLE & B.H.MARLAPALLE & NARESH NARESH NARESH H.PATIL H.PATIL H.PATIL,JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE :- 19TH SEPTEMBER,2006 :- 19TH SEPTEMBER,2006 :- 19TH SEPTEMBER,2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Admittedly, the orders passed by this Court on 4th May, 2006 as well as on 27th June, 2006 in Writ Petition No.1095 of 2006 were not served on Respondent Nos.5 and 6 at any time and therefore, we are satisfied that there is no prima facie case made out to take cognizance for contempt within the meaning of section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act,1971. Hence, the Petition is dismissed. 2. At the same time, it is made clear that this order will not come in the way of the Petitioner - Union to take alternative remedy i.e. available in law. (NARESH (NARESH (NARESH H.PATIL,J.) H.PATIL,J.) H.PATIL,J.) (B (B (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) H.MARLAPALLE,J.) H.MARLAPALLE,J.)