^ w^]. \ <%r^C4^ ^^ssS mGHCOURTOFCHHATriSGARHATBIL^^ WRIT PBTITION (227t N0. 3897/2011 PETITIONER/ APPUCANT VBRSU8 Sikaadar Tirki, S/o Late Shri Vrisiyash Tirki, Aged about 42 years, R/o Ramanujnagar, Tahsil Surajpur, Distdct Sarguja, Chhattisgarh Dadai Raxa, S/o Sadhu Ram @ Sudhaii Ram Aged about 60 years, R/o Batra, TahsH Surajpxir, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh Braach Manager, Sarguja Chetdya Gramia Baak Ramanujnagar, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh Braach Manager/ Central Bank of India, Ramaaujnagar, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh Block Medical Officer, Priiaaxy Healfh Center, Raiaanujnagar, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. |IW |KNN—WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLB 227 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF I INDIA. (SB :Hon*ble Mr. T.P.8liaBrma, J.) Present:- Mr. Vivek Singhal, Advocate for the petitioner. Respondents not noticed. RB8PONDENTS NO.l/ DEFENDANT N0. 1 RBSPONDENT N0. 2/ DBFBNDANT N0. 2 RE8PONDENT N0. 3/ DBFBNDANT N0. 3 RE8PONDENT N0. 4/ DBFBNDANT N0. 4 ORAL- ORDBR (Passedon 21/07/2011) 1. By fhis petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India petitioner has challenged ftie legaUly aiid propriety ofthe orders dated 23/6/2011 passed by Ci]Ql Judge, Class-1, Surajpur ia Succession Case No. 13/2007 whereby while piMIy aUowiag the amendment appUcation Court bekw has dismissed fhe appUcation for ainendment speciedly relatbig to wifhdrawal of adnussion ie. petitioner is adopted son ofdeceased, 2. Leamed counsel for fhe petitioner is heard. 3, Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits fhat aforesaid pleadmg was bonafide mistake cominitted by petitioner, 4. Para -2 ofthe succession petition clearly reveal fhat petitioner who is nephew of deceased Sophia was adopted by her siace his chiklhood therefore he is sole successor. Pleadiag contaming ia Para-2 does not reveal fhat petitioner '^' ^"' •^^:: -/^ -2-- , ^S^!| | ^^' was cominitted bonafide inistake. In suminery proceediag Court below has rightly disatlowed aforesaid amendment, I do not find aay iUegaUty ia fhe order uapugned requiring any iaterference ia exercise of wnt jurisdiction. ConsequenUy, petition is Uable to be dtemissed and is hercby dismissed. I.A. No. 01 is also disniissed. No order as to costs, Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge •.^