IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1105 of 2011 SHIV BACHAN SAH, SON OF TIMAL SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 22.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Although, petitioner is husband of the deceased lady but admittedly, at the time of alleged occurrence, the petitioner was working at Bombay and he was not present at his home. Furthermore, it is admitted in the written report of the informant that petitioner used to talk on telephone with his family members and not with the informant of this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that in course of investigation, some witnesses have stated that the deceased committed suicide along with her son. Although, learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail but considering the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Kochas P.S. Case No. 99 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )