IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7604 of 2011 Kunti Devi, wife of Kapil Bhagat, resident of village- Nizamuddinpur, P.S. Jehanabad, District-Jehanabad Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2. The Jehanabad Nagar Parishad through its Secretary, Jehanabad 3. The Secretary, Jehanabad Nagar Parishad, Jehanabad ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Ebrahim Kabir, Advocate For the State: Mr. Vipin Kumar, Advocate For Resp. Nos. 3 & 4: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate ---------- 2. 9.5.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsels for the Jehanabad Nagar Parishad and for the State. The petitioner seeks direction upon the respondent authorities of the Jehanabad Nagar Parishad to regularize her service on any class IV post. The case of the petitioner is that she was asked to work as daily wager by order dated 26.8.1993 in place of an employee who had been placed under suspension but on the suspension of the said employee being revoked she was discontinued. Again she had been allowed to work as daily wager by order dated 29.12.1994 for some time. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits 2 that the petitioner had filed representations for her regularization but the same has not been considered by the authorities of the respondent Nagar Parishad. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent, Nagar Parishad contends that the petitioner had been allowed to work as a daily wager for a short period in the years 1993 and 1994 that too initially on account of suspension of an employee and thus her case for regularization is not fit to be considered. It is submitted that the petitioner has come before this court with a stale claim on the basis of work performed in the years 1993 and 1994. This Court is in agreement with the submission of learned counsel for the respondents. The claim of the petitioner is a stale claim without sufficient material in support of the same. The further submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that similarly situated persons have been regularized is not supported by any factual basis or documents in proof of the same. In any case, any illegal act committed by any authority, cannot give rise to a claim by other persons to have similar illegal 3 favour shown to them on the direction of this Court. The writ application is devoid of any merit apart from raising a stale claim. It is accordingly dismissed. S.Pandey ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)