IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.715 OF 2003 FIRST APPEAL NO.715 OF 2003 FIRST APPEAL NO.715 OF 2003 Shenshadbi Bashir Pathan ..Appellant versus Ilahi Gududal Bepari ..Respondent. Shri P.D.Dalvi for the Appellant Ms. Rekha Rajgopal for Respondent no.2. R.M.Momin for the Respondent No.1 Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 25th Jan, 2006 Dated : 25th Jan, 2006 Dated : 25th Jan, 2006 P.C. 1. Heard both the learned Advocates. 2. The application under section 22 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act has been disposed of by the trial judge by granting compensation of Rs.1,70,617/- holding that the salary of the deceased was Rs.1500/- per month. Even from the material on record it does appear that the salary was Rs.1500/- and on the basis of the said salary only calculation has been made. The other alleged income of the deceased is rightly sidcarded by the lower Court. There is no dispute about the age of the workman. There is nothing to show that the compensation granted by the trial judge is incorrect. There is no need to interefere with the order passed. Hence, the appeal is dismissed in limini. (S.R.Sathe, J.)