IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-11-2007 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition Nos. 10534 & 10981 of 1999 Network Clothing Company rep. By Proprietor S.F.No.752 & 760 Susiapuram Colony Road Tiruppur 641 601. .. Petitioner in W.P.No.10534/99 Majestic Exports rep. By Power of Attorney Holder Tiruppur. .. Petitioner in W.P.No.10981/99 Versus 1.Union of India rep by The Secretary to Government Ministry of Textiles, New Delhi. 2.The Apparel Export Promotion Council rep by its Director General NBCC Tower, 15, Bhikaji Cama Place New Delhi 110 068. 3.The Addl.Director General The Apparel Export Promotion Council NBCC Tower, 15, Bhikaji Cama Place New Delhi 110 068. 4.The Director Apparel Export Promotion Council Bungalow Road, Tiruppur 641 602. .. Respondents in both the W.Ps. Prayer in W.P.No.10534 of 1999: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the proceedings of the first respondent made in AEPC/REG/QA/A/1-AM/99 dated 20.4.1999 and quash the same and consequently issue directions directing the respondents to pass orders to reimburse Rs.6,41,835.50/- to the petitioner with interest within a time frame. Prayer in W.P.No.10981 of 1999: Petition filed under Article 226 of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the proceedings of the first respondent made in AEPC/REG/QA/A/1-AM/99 dated 20.4.1999 and quash the same and consequently issue directions directing the respondents to pass orders to reimburse Rs.13,39,626/- to the petitioner with interest within a time frame. For petitioners : Mr.Mohana Sundararajan For respondents : No appearance O R D E R Heard Mr.Mohana Sundararajan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. 2.Both the writ petitions have been filed challenging the communication, dated 20.4.1999, issued by the third respondent relating to the representations, dated 24.3.1999 and 23.3.1999, sent by the petitioners regarding the embargo on 1998 quotas in CAT. EU 26. 3.On a reading of the impugned communication, it is seen that the request of the petitioners have been recommended to the Government of India. However, the recommendation has not been accepted by the Government of India. 3.Thus, it is clear that the impugned communication, cannot be subjected to challenge as no decision has been arrived at or recorded therein. Further, no adverse orders have been passed against the petitioners by the impugned communication, dated 20.4.1999, issued by the third respondent. 4.At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners may be permitted to make appropriate representations to the first respondent, namely, the Secretary to Government, Union of India, Ministry of Textiles, New Delhi, seeking the necessary reliefs. 5.On such submission being made, it is made clear that it is open to the petitioners to make the necessary representations to the concerned authorities seeking the reliefs as found necessary by the petitioners. In such circumstances, the writ petitions stand dismissed with the above observations. No costs. sd/- Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ rpa To 1.The Secretary to Government Union of India Ministry of Textiles, New Delhi. 2.The Director General The Apparel Export Promotion Council NBCC Tower, 15, Bhikaji Cama Place New Delhi 110 068. 3.The Addl.Director General The Apparel Export Promotion Council NBCC Tower, 15, Bhikaji Cama Place New Delhi 110 068. 4.The Director Apparel Export Promotion Council Bungalow Road, Tiruppur 641 602. + Two ccs to Mr. A. Jenasanan, Advocate SR. 69307 & 69308 NG(CO) RP 4/12/2007 W P Nos.10534 & 10981 of 1999 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/