[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL [LODGING] [LODGING] [LODGING] NO.339 OF 2007 IN COURT RECEIVER’S REPORT NO.79 OF 2007 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NOS.336 AND 337 OF 2004 M/s. Ambarwadikar & Co. & Ors. .... Appellants Vs. Ashok Leyland Finance Ltd. .... Respondents Sarvasri Subodh Joshi i/b Rajendra A. Mehta for the Appellants. Ms Shakuntala Joshi for the Respondent. Shri C.R. Bhogaonkar, 2nd Asst. to Court Receiver, present. CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & D.G. KARNIK, JJ. D.G. KARNIK, JJ. D.G. KARNIK, JJ. DATED: MAY 03, 2007 DATED: MAY 03, 2007 DATED: MAY 03, 2007 P.C: P.C: P.C: Heard. The learned Advocate appearing for the appellants craves leave to withdraw the appeal as the appellants want to file a review petition in relation to the impugned order while praying that the interim stay granted may be continued for a period of six weeks. The withdrawal of the appeal is not objected to. However, the continuation of the interim stay is objected to on behalf of the respondent. However, in our considered opinion, since the appellants intend to move for review of the impugned order, we do not find any justification to refuse the continuation of the interim stay granted [2] earlier for a period of six weeks. However, it is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on any of the issues sought to be raised in the appeal and all the issues are kept open. With the above observations, the appeal is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of accordingly. (D.G.Karnik, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/M7al339.7 sjs/M7al339.7 sjs/M7al339.7