IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.622 of 2006 In (CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE 810/2005) Reena Kumari, D/o Sri Shruv Prasad and wife of Vinay Kumar Gupta, Resident of village- Harpur Rai Police Station- Harsidhi, P.O.-Harsidhi, District- East Champaran ….. Respondent-Appellant Versus 01. The State Of Bihar 02. Commissioner cum Secretary, Rural Development Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna 03. District Magistrate cum Collector, East Champaran, Motihari 04. District Welfare Officer, East Champaran, Motihari 05. Sub Divisional Officer, Areraj P.S.- Harsidhi, District- East Champaran 06. Block Development Officer, Harsidhi, East Champaran 07. Child Development Project Officer, Harsidhi, East Champaran 08. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Harpur Rai, P.S.- Harshidhi, Dist- East Champaran ….. Respondents-Respondents 09. Raj Kumari Sinha wife of Upendra Nath Singh, Resident of village- Harpur Rai, P.O.- Murarpur, P.S.- Harsidhi, District- East Champaran ….. Petitioner-Respondent For the Petitioner:- Mr. Dhananjay Kumar & Mr. Sunil Prasad, Advocates For the State:- Mr. Alok Ranjan, A.C. to G.P-17 For Private Res.:- Mr. Uma Shankar Verma, Adv. ---------------------------------- 08. 15.11.2011 The present Appeal is filed by respondent no.9 in the writ petition against the order dated 26.7.2006 passed by the learned single judge in C.W.J.C. No. 810 of 2005. Her case is that she belongs to Extremely Backward Class Community. The learned Single Judge disposed of the writ petition after setting aside the appointment of the respondent no.9, appellant herein observing that in 2 view of policy decision of the Government only members of Scheduled Caste Community can be appointed as Anganbari Sevika and the learned Single Judge remanded the matter back for fresh consideration by appointment committee. The learned Government Pleader submitted that the Government has inducted the rule for appointment for Anganbari Sevika in the year 2010 and fresh appointments have already been made for the aforesaid post and her case has been rejected. But however as has been held by the learned Single Judge, that she belongs to the Extremely Backward Class Community and therefore she cannot be appointed as Anganbari Sevika in the Centre where she has been appointed, we are of the opinion that it would suffice, if a liberty is granted to the appellant herein to apply as a fresh candidate as per the latest rules, if she is otherwise eligible as Anganbari Sewika. This Court orders accordingly. With the above observation, the L.P.A. stands disposed off. P.K. (T. Meena Kumari, J.) (Vikash Jain, J.)