(1) WP 6218.2011+4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6218 OF 2011 Devichand Kisanlal Agrawal PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors. RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION NO.6248 OF 2011 Gaurishankar Kalappa Kore PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors. RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION NO.5811 OF 2011 Pradeep Devidas Pailwan and anr. PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors. RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION NO.6726 OF 2011 Dattatraya Narayanrao Kumbhar and ors. PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors. RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.8971 OF 2011 Mandabai Trimbakrao Gangne and ors. PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. G.V. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. V.D. Rakh, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. Mr. K.K. Kulkarni, Advocate for the respondent no.5 ..... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 01ST DECEMBER, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. Heard. (2) WP 6218.2011+4 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners restricts his claim in the Petitions for direction to the respondent no.1 for considering the representation of the petitioners 1 and 2, inasmuch as in affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the said respondents, a statement is made that the representation of the petitioners is under consideration. 3. Writ Petitions are disposed of with a direction to respondent nos. 1 and 2 to consider and dispose of the representations of the petitioners, if so made by the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case within a period of one (1) month from today. Sd/- Sd/- [M. T. JOSHI, J.] [B. R. GAVAI, J.] arp/