IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6125 of 2011 ARJUN SINGH @ ARJUN BIND Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 19.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report and in course of investigation, the house of one Timmal Bind, Son of Jaddu Bind was raided by the police and one looted mobile and Rs. 12,060/- were recovered. Subsequently, the house of one Arjun Bind, Son of Jaddu Bind was also raided but nothing was found in the house of aforesaid Arjun Bind, Son of Jaddu Bind. Subsequently, it came to light that Arjun Bind and Timmal Bind are same and similar person. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that, as a matter of fact, nothing has been recovered either from conscious possession or from the house of the petitioner and, as a matter of fact, when police could not succeed to implicate the above stated Timmal Bind in the present case, he twisted the matter and implicated the petitioner. It is also contended by him that after raid on the house of aforesaid Timmal Bind, the police prepared seizure list but the aforesaid seizure list does not contain either signature of Timmal Bind or any of his family members. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) 2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Ballia P.S. Case No. 191 of 2009. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)