IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.5944 of 2011 PREMLATA DEVI @ PREMLATA KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR **** /2/ 26 March 2011 Heard the counsel for the parties. 2. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail for offence under Sections 447, 341, 323, 504, 354, 506 AND 385/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3(x)(III)(V)(XI) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant has purchased the land from the gotni of this petitioner for which a mutation case is going on and the only allegation against this petitioner to have abused by calling cast name. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case has been instituted in regard to the protest regarding the land dispute and there is only allegation about the abuse. It has been submitted that the police has submitted the final form, however, there is no averment made in the petition and this development is subsequent to the filing of the case. 2 Be it may, however, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner, Premlata Devi @ Premlata Kumari, is a lady, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on her behalf is allowed. She is directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender, within four weeks, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Halsi P.S. Case No. 114 of 2010 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. S.A. ( Gopal Prasad, J.)