1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.III BAIL APPLI NO.8070/2010 Sampat Raj Vs. State Date of order : 9/9/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ None present for the petitioner. Shri Brahmanand Sharma-representative of P.P. for the State. ****** This third bail application has been filed on behalf of accused-petitioner Sampat Raj, whereas his first bail application was dismissed as withdrawn by order of this Court dated 19.5.2010 and second was dismissed on 12.7.2010 on the ground that he should first approach the learned Court of Sessions. There is no change of circumstances between now and then except that when the first bail application of the petitioner was dismissed, challan was not filed and now challan has been filed, but this cannot be taken as change of circumstances because allegation against the petitioner for which reason the case was treated differently than other accused was that he was author of injury no.8, which is a grievous injury sustained by injured Ghanshyam leading to fracture of left fronto tempro pavical bone. Also it was alleged that another co-accused Dharam Raj has been named along side the petitioner as the author of this injury. At this stage, however, I am not inclined to 2 enlarge the petitioner on bail, he would be again at liberty to apply for bail before the Court of Sessions itself after the statement of injured Ghanshyam Meena is recorded. The prosecution is directed to produce that witness before the trial court on priority basis. With the above direction, the bail application is dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/-