<i^ ^l^F / IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIFATURE AT BI3-ASPUR/(C.G.) Writ Petition No.SS'7^ /2003 PETITIONF.R Versus !>eepak Kumar nupta S/o Srl R»S< f3upta, Ar?ed about~ 27 years^ ^/o Village-Pardhi, Tahsil - pal nistt~ Sarguja< RESPONDENTS ^$^-' ^**-"" c\©^to^^.&V.aspul s (1) State of C.G. Throuah Secretary^ panchayat & Gramin Vilcas Vibhag B»K»S. Bhawan^ Raipur(C.G») (2) ny.nirector, panchayat & Social Welfare nepartment^ Ambikapur nistt - Sarguja (C.G.) (3) Chief Executive Officer, ^anpad Panchayat Balrampur^ Tahsil- Pal^ Mstt- Sarauja (4) Sarpanch^ Gracn panchayat - Pardhi^ Janpad Panchayat^ Salrampur^ Tahsil- Pal^ Mstt- Sarauja* lojRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22^/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22. 3?n^^r •f^i^^l^ $t^itc^^l^W ^3 -3^';;!tFf(^I, 'S^NCT^, iwiwt< ^i^r'^^ ^^^.^.^^.^f./%^ 20ft WN^l:^Nl<!ty ^?Fr^llW^te Petitioner by Shri Manoj Paranj +K(fc'i4lW4lti<"i fe%&<:K*^K '^^Kw^^Nt^f |e, Advocate. Respondents byMlss Shaniiila^inghai, DeputyGovt. Advocate. The petitioner has preferred thi of India. The main grievance of the pet petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution tioner is that he was working as Panchay^t Ka-rmi in village-Pardhi, Tahsil- Pal, District Sar^jja. Since the petitioner^s rektions with the village- Sarpanch were strained and the petiti{iner diallenged certain illegalities of fhe Sarpanch (Respondent No.4), as a revenge thejRespondent No.4 convened QL meetlng of Gmm Panchayat and removed the petition^c from the post of Panchayat Kanni. The said panchayat meeting was convened in |ntter vioktion of the Chhattisgarh Gram Sabha Procedure of Meeting Rules 2001 oxi^ the petitioner against that action sent a norice Atinexure P/5. The petitioner has praye|| in this petition to quash the order ckted 27.9.2003 |^d to hand over the charge to Shri B.KJaiswal. by which the petitioner has been dire' Leamed counsel for the petitioner su|>mits that by this , petition the petitioner is not challenging the removal of the petitione^ w^s entided to file an appeal before the j ^nd efficadous remedy was avail^ble to^ therefDre this petition is not maintainablel |from the post of Pancha^t Karmi as the petitioner j.D.O., which he has not preferred. Since altemative tfae petitioner, which he has not chosen to avail, As such, the petition is dismissed. ConsequentlyM(W)P No. 3229/^ stands disposed of. |003,1.A.No. 10228/2003 andI.A.No. 10229/2003 Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge ^ft^ ^Rsi^ / :'w , !?\'