IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12978 of 2011 Manjesh Kumar @ Manjesh Poddar Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2/ 28/09/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP. Petitioner, Manjesh Kumar @ Manjesh Poddar has prayed for quashing of order of cognizance dated 6.7.2010 on the ground of minority as well as on the ground that no specific allegation has been alleged against him during the court of commission of occurrence so alleged. The State has opposed. The petition appears to be misconceived because of the fact that from the charge-sheet it is evident that the investigation has been completed only against custodial accused, Ram Chandra Poddar and Sudha Devi and so far remaining accused are concerned, it has been kept open and that is further evident from the order impugned dated 6.7.2010 passed by the learned CJM. Because of the fact that no cognizance of offence against the petitioner has been taken therefore, quashing of order of cognizance against the petitioner does not arise. Apart from this, the provision of Juvenile Justice 2 Act will be applicable against the petitioner in case he is found to be juvenile under the Act. As such, petition is rejected. perwez (Aditya Kumar Trivedi,J.)