IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43958 of 2009 CHANDERDEO YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 5.5.2010. Heard. In the light of the earlier order passed in Cr.Misc.Petition No.50508 of 2008, the court is not inclined to direct the release of the above named petitioner on bail. Petition is dismissed. However, the learned trial Judge has recorded that if the parties cooperated, the case may be disposed of in four months time. In a case which is triable by the court of Sessions, it is true that processes could be issued enforcing the attendance of the witnesses by the court on the application in that behalf to be made by the prosecutor, but because the primary duty of the court is to impart justice, as such, it has to make its own efforts for production of witnesses. What I would like to suggest to the learned trial Judge trying Sessions Trial No.1114 of 2008/116 of 2008 arising out of Dhanarua P.S.Case No.72 of 2008 is that he should draw an order putting down the names of all witnesses who are to be - 2 - examined and to send a copy of the order to S.S.P., Patna. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna is directed to direct the officer- in-charge of Dhanarua police station to remain present with all witnesses on dates to be fixed by the learned trial Judge. In case of non- compliance of the order of the learned trial judge, he shall report the same to this court. It is expected that the learned trial Judge gets the appropriate support in production of witnesses from the police force. A copy of this order shall be forwarded to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna for information and compliance. The trial has to be concluded within a further period of nine months to be counted from the date of receipt/production of the copy of the present order before the trial court. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )