IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1854 of 2009 `Anil Prakash Sinha Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr 12/ 24/08/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite parties. Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that Annexure-A to the show cause filed on 12.7.2011 may itself be treated as a formal order having been presented before the Court on oath issued under the orders of the Governor. The Court finds no infirmity in the submission and upholds it. Learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that Annexure-A dated 21.6.2011 has to be read in conjunction with paragraph-6 of the show cause and the petitioner was entitled to pay protection also on the absorbed post of Executive Engineer. The order on the writ petition did not deal with aspects of pay protection, conditions of absorption etc. In contempt proceeding the Court cannot go beyond the directions given in the writ petition to start further enquiry. Any interpretations or counter interpretations of the order dated 21.6.2011 is not possible in the contempt jurisdiction where further enquiry may have to be held with regard to the conditions of absorption etc. 2 The remedy for the aggrieved shall lie in a fresh appropriate proceeding only. The contempt proceeding stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)