IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 5645 of 2010 Date of Decision: August 05, 2011 Surinder Pal Mahendiratta …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: Mr. Parvesh Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gagandeep Wasu, Sr. DAG, Haryana 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that Mr. Surinder Pal Mahendiratta, who is the petitioner in the instant petition is present in the Court and he wishes to withdraw the writ petition. In that regard, learned counsel for the petitioner has taken instructions from Mr. Surinder Pal Mahendiratta. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (A.N. JINDAL) JUDGE August 05, 2011 Atul