IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3297 of 2009 Between: 1 Sri Dayyala Mal Reddy, S/o Venkata Reddy, R/o. Sarkar Thopu, SV. Nagar, Angallu Village and Post Kurabalakota Mandalam. 2 Sri E. Naveen Kumar, son of Venkataiah, R/o. D.No.1/535 A Amineni St. Madanapalle, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The State of A.P., reptd. by its District Collector, Chittoor. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 3 The Tahasildar, Kurabalakota Mandal, Chittoor District. 4 The Sub-Registrar, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order proceeding, direction or a writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in issuing the impugned proceedings ROC B/9/2009 Dt.19.1.2009 to the 4th respondent not to register sale deeds pertaining to the S.No.850/3 for an extent Ac. 3.45 cents of Angallu Village of Kurabalakota Mandalam of Chittoor District as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.S.S.BHATT Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3297 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioners claim to have purchased an extent of Ac.1.50 cents in Sy.No.850/3 of Angallu Village, Kurabalakota Mandal of Chittoor District, from one Mr. R. Subramanyam. The original owner is said to be one Mr. Sheik Peeru Sab alias Gudu Chinna Peeru Sab. The petitioners feel aggrieved by a letter dated 19.01.2009 addressed by the Tahsildar, Kurabalakota Mandal, Chittoor District, the 3rd respondent herein, to the Sub-Registrar, Madanapalle, the 4th respondent herein, informing that the land in Sy.No.850/3 admeasuring Ac.3.45 cents was assigned to one Mr. Sheik Kamal Saheb and that no documents be registered in respect of that land. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. The 3rd respondent did nothing more than informing the 4th respondent as to the character of the land in Sy.No.850/3. In case the petitioners want any strong basis for that conclusion, they can very well approach the 3rd respondent, and the latter, in turn, would be under an obligation to furnish the information. Depending on the nature of information, the petitioners have to workout their remedies before the appropriate authorities or Court. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioners to approach the 3rd respondent to furnish the information on the basis of which the land in Sy.No.850/3 of Angallu Village, Kurabalakota Mandal of Chittoor District, is being treated as an assigned land. The 3rd respondent, in turn, shall furnish the information within three weeks from the date of submission of such application. It is open to the petitioners to workout their remedies depending upon the information that would be furnished by the 3rd respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY 12th March, 2009. Note:- Issue CC in three days. BO IBL