THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 1409 of 2008 Dated: 29.01.2008 Between: C.Venugopal Reddy and others. … Petitioners AND The Special Collector (LA), Galeru Nagari Sujala Sravanthi, Sankarapuram, Kadapa, Kadapa District & another. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri D.Kondada Rami Reddy Counsel for the respondents : Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 1409 of 2008 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not including certain structures belonging to the petitioners in notification dated 14.11.2007 issued under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, ‘the Act’) and published in Andhra Jyothi Telugu daily newspaper, as illegal and arbitrary. Heard Sri D. Kodanda Rami Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition. Though the petitioners have not filed any material in support of the existence of the said alleged structures, except the representations made by them to respondent No.2, I do not propose to non-suit the petitioners only for this reason because if there really exist such structures and they are not included in the notification, the petitioners cannot be denied compensation. Since the dispute whether the structures really exist or not can be resolved only by making a personal inspection, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2 to make a local inspection of the property, which is under acquisition, after giving advance notice to the petitioners, make the personal assessment and include these structures, if they are found to be in existence under acquisition, if necessary, by issuing an addendum to the notification already issued under Section 4 (1) of the Act. Subject to the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.1684 of 2008 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 29.01.2008 mdaa