IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30815 of 2009 RANJEET YADAV, son of Umesh Yadav, resident of village Nawabganj, P.S. Sirdalla, District Nawada Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 17.11.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. The petitioner facing prosecution for offence u/ss 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code would seek bail primarily on the ground that he too alike co-accused Ranjeet Rajbanshi was not named in the F.I.R. and nothing tangible has been found against him as also in the case of the said co-accused Ranjeet Rajbanshi. He would, therefore, submit that when Ranjeet Rajbanshi has already been directed to be released on bail by an order dated 27.10.2009 in Cr.Misc.No. 25908/2009, the petitioner would also be entitled for bail, especially when he has also got no criminal antecedent (Para 6). Taking into account that the case of the petitioner stands on an identical footing as that of Ranjeet Rajbanshi, this Court would direct for release of the abovenamed petitioner on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. 2 Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawadah in Nawada P.S.Case No. 333/2006 on the same terms and conditions, namely, (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, and (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/