INITHE HIGH C©URf©FdUDICATURE AT BILASPUR: CEHHATTlSGARH W.P.NO. &e. OF2005 Retitioner t^ Johan Singh Paikra S/oShri Man Singh Paikra Aged about 44 years, Presently workingas Asstt. S&Sm^j iSKy""" i^""^ R/o Vivekanand Nagar, Mopka, Bilaspur(Chhattisgarh) Versus Respondent& / 1. State ofChhattisgarh Tlirough it&Secretaryi GC»ft.pfC!;Kha<ltisgarh DeRtt. OfHjg^erEducation D;l^^ Bhavan, Mantralaya Raipar(ChMattisgarh) ^2. The Director DirgctorateofHigher Education RaipUr(Chhattisgarh) ^-3. SKri K.R. Matawle Asstt. F'FofessQr, ©everhmentCollege, PiathaFia, @istt. Bilaspur Chtiattisgarh KN((RIT:liBllTl»NMNBBKll^BiiliE£l-Es2^2270F:'THE •'aBNnisniBSEiiffiini^'',"[ : ; lli! HIGH CQURTQP CHHATTISOARH AT Bll.ASPUR SINGLEBENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATiSH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. Petitipner Resppndents WRIT PETITION N0.6075 OF 200S Johan Singh Paikra vefsys State of Chhattisgarh and others HfEIN ^ Present : MF. Ratnesh Kumar Agrawai, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. AjayDwvedt, Panel Lawyer for Vhe State/respondenfe No.1 and 2 . None appears for respondent No.3. (Passed on 27 DayofPebruary, 20Q7) The petifensr while working as Assistant Professor in Govemment Coilege, Mashiri, District Bilaspur has been transferred to Govemment P.G. College, J^daipur, District Bastar, vide order dated )-11 -20 (P-1). The petitioner impugns the tran^er order dated 10- 11-2005 (P-1). 2. ThisCourt,videmteTimorderdated06-12-2Cn5,directed that so fer as the petitioner isconcerned.fce order dated 10-11-2CX)5 (P-1) is stayed, till the next date of hearing. 'y;^.. 3. With the passage of time, the writ petition has beeome ( : . infructuous, to whteh teamed counsel appearing for fte State/respondente No.1 and2 has no objedion. 4. Thys, the writ petition is dismissed as having beeome / ~ . infructuoys. NooFderas tocoste. -—-~— Satfsh K. Agrifaottl Judge