%27.5 .20 11 #8 Present Mrs. Amita Gupta, Adv. for MCD. Mr.B .B .Jain, Adv . for respondents. + CM No.5531/2008 in LPA No.186/2008 CM No.5566/2008 in LPA No.184/2008 These are applications for condonation of delay in preferring the appeals. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we find that sufficient cause exists for condonation of delay and, accordingly, delay in filing the appeals stand condoned. The applications are accordingly disposed of. LPA No.186/2008, 526/2003, 576/2003 and 184/2008 Heard Mrs. Amita Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the MCD and Mr. B.B. Jam, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. It is very fairly submitted by Mrs. Gupta and Mr. Jam, learned counsel appearing for the parties that the question that is involved in these appeals is a subject •:_ matter .of SLP(C) No.32085/2010 and in the said matter on 13.5.2011 the Apex Court has required the respondent therein to file the counter affidavit and rejoinder affidavit within a particular stipulated period of time. In view of the aforesaid, it is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that there can be no cavil that the judgment delivered in SLP(C) No.32085/2010 would cover the present controversy. Regard being had to Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified the aforesaid submission, it is directed that the parties in the present appeals shall be bound by the order passed by the Supreme Court on all fours and consequences thereof shall be given effect to. The appeals are accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE . -'-~ --If (_ * SANJIV KHANNA, J MAY 279 2011 dk