IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1198 of 2011 BHARAT TIWARY SON OF LATE RAMADHAR TIWARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.2.2011 By an order dated 3.9.2010 vide Cr.Misc.No.29819 of 2010, the petitioner was allowed bail but on condition that his brother would be one of the bailors. It appears from paragraph 3 of the petition that some dispute has arisen between the petitioner’s wife and the brother and, therefore, he is not ready to stand surety for him. Under the circumstances, it has been pleaded that the petitioner’s wife, namely, Puspa Devi be substituted in place of the brother. In view of such, the order dated 3.9.2010 is modified and the petitioner’s wife be substituted as one of the bailors. Application stands allowed. Let the order be communicated to the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in Nokha P. S. case No.38 of 2010 through fax at the cost of the petitioner. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )