IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5621 of 2009 RAMNANDAN DAS & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 14.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Questioning the order dated 15.12.2008 rejecting the prayer that no offence under Section 307 of the Penal Code was made out to warrant Sessions trial when the other offences alleged was triable by Magistrate, the submission is that the order of rejection is unreasoned and non-speaking with regard to the satisfaction of the Court as to how an offence triable by Session Court was made. Learned counsel for the State points out that the injury report produced on behalf of the petitioner as annexed are themselves inconclusive. This Court finds it difficult to arrive at any conclusive opinion in the nature of the injury report annexed to the petition more particularly with regard to the injury on Ram Siya Devi. It need only be noted that the allegations of assault are with an iron rod. The order dated 15.12.2008 is accordingly set aside and the matter is remanded to the Additional 2 Sessions Judge, F.T.C., IV, Samastipur to pass a fresh, reasoned and speaking order on the petitioner’s objection that no offence under Section 307 of the Penal Code was made out. The Sessions Court is only required to prima facie discuss issues of its satisfaction without the need for a detailed order. The application is allowed with directions aforesaid. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)