FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2076 OF 2008 ( MR.ELDRED ANTHONY NICHOLAS LOBO V/S. M/S. GANRAJ GROUP & ORS.) ___________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or Court's or Judge's directions and Registrar's orders orders ___________________________________________________________ Mr.P.M.Pradhan ,adv.for petitioner. Mrs.A.A.Mane, APP for respondent/State. CORAM: SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED: 6TH MARCH, 2009. P.C. : 1. Heard counsel for both sides. 2. This writ petition is filed to challenge the correctness and legality of the order dated 7th June, 2008 passed by the Sessions Court, Thane in Criminal Revision Application No.136 of 2006. By the impugned judgment, the Sessions Court modified the order of compensation from Rs.1,27,00,000/- to Rs.1,85,73,000/-. Respondents no.1 to 4, the original accused had also preferred an appeal to challenge the order of their conviction under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act. By the same common order, the appeal had been dismissed. 3. Mr.Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the impugned order cannot be justified in law since the sentence of simple imprisonment awarded to the respondents till rising of the court is too mild and not in proportion to the gravity of the matter. Perusal of the impugned order shows that the counsel for both sides had made a statement before the Sessions court that they have no grievance so far as the other part of the judgment is concerned, except, for the amount of compensation awarded by the learned Trial Judge. In these circumstances, no grievance can be made now as regards the substantive part of the sentence. The writ petition is therefore dismissed in limine. [JUDGE]