THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.20459 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner was awarded a contract under the Build Operate and Transfer Scheme to construct 24 shops in a vacant site of 830 square meters abutting the Civil Hospital, Peddapalli. Necessary agreement and lease deed were entered into on 12.02.2007. Complaints were made against the petitioner before Lokayukta, alleging that the petitioner deviated from the sanctioned plan and constructed four additional shops. It is also alleged that as against 830 square meters, constructions were brought in an area of 921 square meters. Lokayukta passed an order on 20.08.2008 directing demolition of the additional structures. Acting on the same, the 3rd respondent issued notice, dated 30.08.2008, requiring the petitioner to demolish the unauthorized structures. The same is challenged in this writ petition. The 3rd respondent filed a counter affidavit. It is alleged that the petitioner deviated from the agreement in several respects and he has even converted the staircases and the place earmarked for Sulabh Complex into shops. Notice is said to have been issued in pursuance of the orders passed by the Lokayukta. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. It is not in dispute that the relationship between the petitioner and the respondents is governed by an agreement as well as a lease deed. Normally, this Court would not entertain the writ petitions as regards contractual matters. The rare cases, in which the writ petitions are entertained, are where no disputes exist, as to the terms of contract or compliance with the same. In the instant case, the petitioner has deviated from the terms of contract. The only justification pleaded by him is that the steps for regularization of the deviations are pending. On a complaint received by it, the institution of Lokayukta passed an order directing that the deviated constructions must be demolished. It is rather surprising that the petitioner treated the site allocated to him as his private one and made indiscriminate constructions. The place earmarked for common public facility was converted into a shop. His greed did not stop there and even the staircases were converted into shops. The long lease of 25 years granted to him became handy and the respondents in turn remained indifferent even while such blatant illegalities were taking place. This Court is not inclined to entertained the writ petition. At any rate, the illegal structures are said to have been removed. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed and the respondents shall ensure that no structure made in deviation of the sanctioned plan remains. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 19.01.2009 JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.20459 of 2008 Date: 19.01.2009 JSU