IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13320 of 2008 RAM DARESH MAHTO R/O- LATE BENGO MAHTO R/O- VILLAGE SONAMA, P.S.- BAKHARI, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. UPENDRA MAHTO, S/O- LATE RAMRUP MAHTO R/O- VILLAGE SONAMA, P.S.- BAKHARI, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI. For the petitioner : Mr. Subhash Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ----------- 2 16.11.2010 First party to the proceeding under Section 145 of Cr.P.C., giving rise to Case no. 83M/2000, has approached this Court questioning the initial order passed by learned S.D.M., Bakhari as also the revisional order dated 13.12.2007 passed in Cr. Rev no. 139 of 2005 whereby on a consideration of the evidence brought on record, both oral and documentary, possession of second party was declared in respect of the disputed land. It appears that aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the petitioner preferred Cr. Rev. no. 139/05 which was considered and dismissed by order dated 13.12.2007. The revisional order records that the order of learned S.D.M., Bakhari is well discussed and based on evaluation/appraisal of evidence produced in the inquiry by the parties. This Court does not find any merit in the application. It is accordingly dismissed. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )