1 CP NO.161 OF 2009 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.161 OF 2009 (Rajashree Pramod Sawant Vs. Mahadeo Kishanrao Shinde) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. Rahul Karpe, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. B.S.Shinde, Adv., h/f Mr. E.S.Murge, Adv., for respondent (sole). ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:10-12-2010 1. Heard Mr.Karpe, learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. Refusal to effect mutation by the Talathi concerned, based on non obtaining no objection or consent from the original owner Mathurabai, is felt to be breach of the decree in favour of the present petitioner. In the affidavit in reply, the alleged contemnor has made his stand clear. It is not that he has deliberately or with some calculation not followed the orders. If the petitioner is aggrieved by such conduct of the Talathi, he has other appropriate 2 CP NO.161 OF 2009 remedies which the petitioner is at liberty to adhere to. Contempt Petition itself is not a solution. I do not see any dereliction on the part of the Talathi in not towing to the tune as the petitioner desired. No Contempt. Contempt petition dismissed. Respondents discharged. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/161-09cp