EIGH CGURT OF CHEATTISGARH AT EELA$HER WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3476 of2fi§8 : 1. Mehit Kumar RAth Age about 55 year, U.D.T. S/o Shri Dukheshwar Prasad Ram PoEice Line Gharghoda Disi‘i. — Raigarh (CG) Sim. Meera Swamkar Age aboat 3G years, LDT. W/o Shri N.C.Swamkar C/o RSSahm (Stem) Forest) Near Jiia Pamhayat Chate- Aitarmuda, Distt. ~ Raigarh (CG) 3. Chandra Kant Dubey Age about 49 years, Teacher? S/o Shri Ghanshyam ’s’msad Dubey RJ’O Dhangardiya, Ward No. '2, Biock — Gharg‘nodan Distt. Raigarh. 4. Smt. Rama Shanna Age about 52 yeaw, U.D.T. W/o Shri Saheb Led $harma Neax Polise Lim Hukmu Coicny, Block Gharghoda. Distt. Raigarh. 5. Urgasen Swamkar Age elbow: 54 years? EDT. Slo Shri Bizawani Swamkar Village 8c Post — Gharghodav Disti. Raigarh (C.G.) 6. Krishila Swamiiar Age abou‘i 35 yeaars, EDT. S/o Shri Bhupati La! Swamkar Gevi, H.S.S. Ghai‘ghGda, Digit. Raigarh (C.G.) 7, Bharat La1 Yadav Age about 53 years, Asa. Teacher S/o Shri Lai Ram Yadav High Schooi Gharghoda Dist: Raigarh (CG) 8. Kapiieehwar Namdeo Age a§jeut 53 years, Asit. Teacher S/o Shri Bairam Namcieo High $c11001 Gharghoda, Dis‘ii. Raigarh (CG) 9. Gajraj Singh Thalia: Age abeu? 5} years? Astt. Teacher S/o Shri Kama} singh Thakui' Posi ~ Ghaxghoda, Dim. Raigarh (C.G.) 1G.Ram Charan Chouhan Age abom 56 years, A311. Teacher S/e Shri Basti Ram Cheuhan Via. Post Porada, Gharghodai Distt. Raigm‘h (C.G.) HJhanku Ram Sidar Ace about 58 years, Ase: Teacher, S/o Shri Sob‘iian Ram Sixial“, Via. Post Deharidih, Gharghoda, Distt. Raigarh (CG) 12.Dudhwant Rae Age about 56 year, Astt. Teacher S/o Shri Mahettar Ree ‘Primary $ch001 Dengardula Block — Nagli Die’a. Dhamtari. 13. Smt. Rlikmani Singh Age about §2 years, Astt. Teacher Wm Shri D.K.Singh, Govt H.S.S.Ghargheda, {Meta Raigarh (C.G.) 14.8hagwm1 Prasad Tiwari Age 211mm 52 yeaje, Headmaster S/e Late Shri Radheshyam Tiwari Maa Baigin Dakari Marg, Gharghoea, Distt. Raigarh (CG) 15.3amosh Kumar Chouhan Age about 55 yeam, UjDfF. S/o Shri Pi§wa Ram Chouhan Midd‘e PETETIGNERS )b. a x x Schoo} Navapara (Tenda) Bieck _ Gharghwa, Distt. Raigarh. 16.Bed Rim Rathiya Age about 52 years, Astt. Teachen S/o Shri Ganda Rai Rathiya Kharsamuda, Gharghoda, Distt. Raigarh {C.G.) 1’7. Ganpa‘t Lal Dansena Age about 6O yeaw, Agstt Teacher S/o Shri Kamk Ram Daasena E’rimary Schooi Bhaiumar Block. Gharghoda, Dim. 18.}3abu Ram Rathiya Age about 54 yaar, U.D.T. S/o Shri Tiiak Ram Rathiya Mickik School Raigarh C}1otegui11da Block Gharghada, Disti. Raigaxh 19.3ha<iu Ram Sarwam Age about 54 yeat; Astt‘ Taacher S/o Late Shj‘i Bhoka Ram Via. Post ~ Pholkatpara, Gharghoda, Dist Raigar?‘1 (C‘G‘) ’ 2G.Sui'j00 Prashad Patei Age abom 56 year, U.D.T. S/o Shri ‘Bhan Singh “Patei Govt. Ht Sec. $chooi Ghargimda Disti. —v Raigarh (CG) 21.Chhatter La1 Paiei Ag$ about 52 year, Teacher, S/o Late Shri Ganga Ram Pate} Viliage Post — {)orada 830(3k Gharghoda, Distt. ~ Raigarh. 22.Hem Ram Naik Age about 55 war. UDL'IX S/o‘ Shri Mohan Singh Naik Middle Scheol Chhan'atangar Block Gharghoda, Dim. Raigarh. ‘23.Gu1ai Sidar Age about 55 year, Astt. Teacher S/o Shri Dabaiu Sidar Middle School Navapara (Tenda) Block Gharghoda, Distt. Ralgarh. '24.l)warika Prasad .lolhe Age about 52 years, Asit. Teacher S/o Late Shri Jhulam Jolhe Via. l’ost — Gharghoda Block Ghaxghoda Distt. — Raigai'h. 25.Kripa Ram Rathiya Age about 54 year, U.D.T. S/o Shri Sahdev Singh Ralhiya Middle School Chimtapani, Block Gharghoda. Distt. Raigarh. Z6.Santosh Kinnar Paikara Age about 53 years, U..D.T. S!o Late Shri Tejram Paikara Middle School Emliclih Block Gharg‘noda, Distt. Raigarh. 27.Tilak Ram Kishan Age abooi 49 year, Assti. Teacher S/o Shrl Chumau Lal Kishan Primary School Ajitgarh, Block Gharghoda, Distt. Raigarh. 28.Tej Ram l3atel Age about 60 years, Astt. Teacher S/o Shri Girdhari Lal Patel, Via. Post Baihamuda, Gharghoda, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : l. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Tribal & Education Department D.K.S. Bhawao, Distt. — Raipur. ‘ . Distt: Education Officer Dhamtari/Raigarh (C..G.) . Astt. Commissioner. Trible Welfare Depamnent Raigarh Disit. Raigarh (CG) 4. Treasury, Accounts & Penssion Dhamtari/Ra‘igarh (CG) WRXT PETITEON UNI‘J‘ER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF lNDiA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K‘ Agnihotri. J. Present: Shri Somkant Verma” Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Gavermuem Advocate for the State/respondents. ORAL 0mm; (Passed (E'Wf‘day of Juiy, 2008) With the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. . The petitioners were appointed as Assistant Teachers on a fixed pay of Rs. 100%. Aiier completion of their respective probatiox} period, they were granted regular pay scale. . Learned counsei appearing for the petitioners submits that the ssue i involved in the case is asto whether, the petitioners are entitled to reguiar pay scale wef. the date initial appointment or atter completion of probation period. . The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Maéhukant. Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of MR & others), wherein it was heid that the similar1y situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scaie wef. the date of initia}. appointment. The matter was taken up to Hon‘ble Supreme Court in Speciai Leave Petition (Civi!) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon‘bie Supreme Court uphotding the decision of the Tribunal to the ett‘ect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are emitted to regular pay seate ttom date of initial appointment. ‘7 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners aiso submits that this couxt, While considering the same iSsue in Amar Sai Ram & others Vs. State of “Chhaaisgarh & ethers [W.P. (S) N0. 4725/2G06} by order dated 03.09.2006, alloweci the petitieners to make a representation along with copy of the petition and annexures within a period of ten days, raising alt their grievances and in tum the concerned respondent was directed to decide the representation in an objective manner within a period of 30 days from the date ofreceipt of the representation. 5. Accordingiy, the petitioners are granted iiberty to make a representation raising at] their grievances and in turn, the concerned respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordance with law, on its own merits; within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 6. In. View ofthe foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge u», i‘ 3”J“