IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 18723 of 2008 Between: ..... PETITIONER AND .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.KISHORE RAI Counsel for the Respondent No.: R.RADHA KRISHNA REDDY(SC FOR GHMC,SNCZONE) The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 18723 OF 2008 ORDER: 1. This writ petition has been ﬁled by P. Sadanand assailing the inaction of the respondents 1 to 5 on the representations made by him with regard to the illegal constructions made by 5th respondent. 2. When the writ petition came up for admission, Sri R. Radha Krishna, learned standing counsel of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation received notice on behalf of respondents NO.1 to 5. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 5. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the construction made by the 6th respondent is causing obstruction to the free ﬂow of air and sun light to his house and therefore necessary direction is required to be given to the respondents 1 to 5 to act on his representation and take necessary action. 5. The petitioner has issued a notice to the Town Planning Oﬃcer, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation on 24-7- 2008. The grievance as set out by the petitioner in the notice is that the construction made by the 6th respondent is causing obstruction for free ﬂow of air and sun light to his house. It is purely a private dispute between the petitioner and the 6th respondent. There is no public law element involved in the writ petition. The petitioner has to workout his remedies in the civil Court establishing his easementary right, if any. 6. Reserving the said liberty, the writ petition is dismissed at the admission stage. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B. Seshasayana Reddy 28th August, 2008. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 18723 OF 2008 28th August, 2008.