IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.547 of 2009 1. ANUSUIYA SHARMA, W/O LATE SHYAM SUNDER SHARMA. 2. MANOJ KUMAR JOSHI. 3. DEEPAK KUMAR JOSHI. SONS OF LATE SHYAM SUNDER SHARMA 4. PRATIMA DEVI, D/O LATE SHYAM SUNDER SHARMA, W/O OM PRAKASH SHARMA. 5. SAMTA KUMARI, D/O LATE SHYAM SUNDER SHARMA. ALL RESIDNT OF MOHALLA-GIRLS SCHOOL ROAD, AMLA TOLA, OLD WARD NO. 8 AND NEW 10 OF KATIHAR MUNICIPALITY, P.S.-KATIHAR, DISTRICT-KATIHAR. ………………PLANITIFFS/PETITIONERS. Versus 1. GOKULANAND DAS, S/O LATE DEVANAND DAS. 2. DAYANAND DAS, S/O LATE VARDHANAND DAS, BOTH RESIDENTS OF MOHALLA-BANIA TOLA, P.S. & DISTRICT-KATIHAR. 3. SAMIR KUMAR DAS, S/O LATE VARDHANAND DAS. 4. KRISHNA NAND DAS MINOR SON OF LATE VARDHANAND DAS UNDER THE GUARDIANSHIP OF HIS MOTHER MOST. MEENA DAS. 5. MOST. MEENA DAS, W/O LATE VARDHANAND DAS, ALL AT SL. NOS. 3 TO 5 ARE RESIDENTS OF MOHALLA- BANIA TOLA, P.S. AND DISTRICT-KATIHAR. ………………DEFENDANT 1ST PARTY/O.P. 6. MD. ISRAIL, S/O MD. SAMSUDDIN, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA-PAKUR, P.O.-PAKUR, P.S.-PAKUR, DISTRICT-SAHEBGANJ. 7. FIRDOSI BEGUM, W/O MD. ZAMAL, R/O MOHALLA- CHOUDHARY MOHALLA, P.O AND P.S.-KATIHAR, DISTRICT-KATIHAR. ………………DEFENDANT 2ND PARTY/O.P. ----------- 2 06.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The defendants has filed this revision application against order dated 10.2.2009 passed by Sub-Judge-I, Katihar in Title Suit No. 82 of 2000 by which the learned court below has kept the application of the plaintiffs for amendment in the plaint for hearing after the completion of the evidence of both the sides. 2 It goes without saying in case the amendment is finally allowed in the suit at any later stage the defendants will be at liberty to file additional written statement and order lead further evidence in view of the amendment made in the plaint. In the circumstances, I do not find any merit in the application and the same is dismissed. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)