c^" ^^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGHCQURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C-o.s^C&) Contexnpt Pctitio No. /2010 ^V~rt^ PBTITIONERS 1. W 'f::, ....•^"^•^a^- ^^.•^^;^\.^" ^;i<"!>.'-]s-(s''v ^ Thandaram Patel, S/o Shri Loknath Patel, aged about 30 years, R/o Kanchan Ganga Colony, '...••'&v^^7 Phase-II, House No. 99, Raipur (C.G.). zS^ ^^^ RBSPONDENTS 2. Arun Kumar Kedia S/o Shri Mohan Lal Kedia, aged about 30 years, R/o Near Tulsi Hotel, Ramniwas Talkies Chowk, Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Mr. Vikassheel S/o - (not known to the petitioner) Secretary, Department of Health, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Mr. S.L. Aadile, Directorate of Medical Education Ghhattisgarh, through its Director, Raipur (C.G.) CQNTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTIOILOF INDIA^READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF THE COURT ACT, 1971. 3TT^T^T 'f^ri^^T^T ^4^ich ^f^a ^-.-__ Prayeea ~T~ ^^ ^^r ^l^ld<L}, ^Tll^^^, t^TRTy ^w^rr^w^ 3?i^r 'V^K ..r^.c.te..^^/ -M fe^^r ^ 3TT^T'^HW^rf^T SB : Hon^ble Shri Manlndra iMohan Shrivastava, J. 18.02.2011 Shri Vmay Pandey, Shri Rakesh Pandey, Heard. couijisel colimsel pre^cribe Leamed counsel for submitted that respondent passed by this Court on 14th He further submits that thou^ti 14th June, 2010 did not the exercise directed by th^ promptly took up the matte^ departmental co-ordination, Court has been complied wift^. This factual submissioit for fhe petitioners. Taking into considerati|on reply ofrespondent No.2, rul^ Consequently, fhe rule The petition is accordii <=hi^F<n4!ri ^iiHc^f'^ Fs^l ^-^K ^ ^lNH'3:H^T for the petitioners. for respondent No.2. jrespondent No.2, at the outset, psTo.2 has complied with the order |June, 2010 inW.P. (C) No.2364/10. fhe order passed by fhis Court on any time limit for completing Court, tfae respondent-aufhority and some time was consumed in t?ut finaUy, fhe order passed by fhis 1s not disputed by leamed counsel 1s the submissions made and fhe requires to be discharged. discharged. •rdin^ly finaUy dispos©dof. .^^^^w Man^dra l'7;dge [^ ••~3t^.-"