-^\ ^' ._.. ./..^A ^3<S2"^ XI-HG—78 'SSt ^{WM<i, ®<i1*f<l(o,fqdl'Hy '..c.ej.......&.^± 3:n^I'qaRT( 311^1'^I'S^fe ^qian^ignm? '^H^I^T ^THcff ^* 'feT€i'^T<^1< ^atfgiisn^i Sinnle Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dhirdndra Mishra. J Petitioner Respondents yersus 1. 4. 5. 6. Vipr^i Arts, Commerce & Physical Education Coll^ge, through Principal, near Pt. R.S. Unhl'ersity Domar Talab, Raipur (CG) Stat^ of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Schjwl Education, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) The Rai|] UnM The| Director, Western Regional Committee, Natibnal Council for Teachers Education, (NCTTE) Manas Bhavan, Shymla Hills, Bhopal IMPt) Bhakrein Marfa The| Rest Nadar 15.5.2009: Mr. Amiyakant Tiwari, coun^ Mr. Ajit Singh, PL for the Sf4 The petitioner has filed the| the order of Annexure P/1, wherebl respondent No.3 onthe ground within the stipulated time. Registrar, Pt. Ravi Shankar Univers'rty, ur, District Raipur (CG) (Affiliating ersity) Sect'etary cum Appellate Authority, National Coi<ncil for Teachers Education (NCTE), t-lans Bhatrein, near Tilak Bridge, Bahadur Shah Jafar Marfa, New Delhi. Director, State Council for Educational !arch and Training (SCERT) BTI Shankar ir, Raipur (CG) Mallant Laxmi Narayan Das College, Through the 1 Secretary, Shiksha Pracharak Samiti, Garjdhi Chowk, Raipur (CG) ^l for the petitioner. |te/respondent No.1. instant petition and prayed for quashing of petitioher has been refused recognition by hat the petitioner has not submitted reply •W^-tSlSIWSSiv I-HG—78 3^1 •qil 1yiN; "snsiT^ycgmN; p 's^ ^ww^, yiily'is, fsi<niy'j,< . ^PCCJ 2-S-TO y 2- ordler <tn Fl/1 Learned counsel for the p| even not supplied copy of the the petitioner has filed an appeal order, which is pending before th< this petition may be disposed of vj copy of the order of Annexure respondent No.4 to decide the stipulated period. Heard. Taking into consideration appeal against the order of Anne< said order, respondent No.3 has r^ institution, this petition is disposep supply authenticated copy of th< forthwith, and respondent No. 4 is| the petitioner uncter Section 18 weeks from the date of C.c. today itself. ^titioner submite that respondent No.3 has l|er of Annexure P/1 to the petltioner, though the basis of Internet copy of the impugned respondent No.4. He further submite that jith a direction to respondent No.3 to supply to the petitioner and further direction to Ipending appeal of the petitioner within a 'WqfepN •EIPRTf^ fezt "!^R$n ^siRnan^i ^iat the petitioner has already preferred an jcure P/1 and further considering that by ttie r^fused to grant recognition to the peUtioner's of with a direction to respondent No.3 to order of Annexure P/1 to the petitioner jfurther directed to decide the appeal filed by of|the NCTE Act, 1993 within a period of three receipt/protluction of copy of this order. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge i'y ,—-^