SBCWP NO.5674/1994– MOTI LAL MAHENDRA V/S STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. . : JUDGMENT DATED 3.12.2008 1/4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5674/1994 Motilal Mahendra versus The State of Rajasthan and ors. PRESENT HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI None present for the petitioner. Ms.Pratishtha Dave, for the respondents. DATE OF ORDER : 3rd December, 2008. O R D E R 1. Though this writ petition could have been dismissed for want of prosecution as no body appeared on behalf of the petitioners, however, since the reply has been filed to the writ petition recently on 14.11.2008 in pursuance of the directions of this Court. The learned Counsel for the respondents present in the Court was heard in the matter and with the assistance of the learned counsel for the respondents, the Court has perused the record. SBCWP NO.5674/1994– MOTI LAL MAHENDRA V/S STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. . : JUDGMENT DATED 3.12.2008 2/4 2. By this writ petition, the petitioner Motilal Mahendra who expired during the pendency of this writ petition on 20.6.2005 and his LRs were taken on record by orders of this Court was appointed as Sub-Nakedar, has claimed promotion to the post of Nakedar in the respondent – Municipal Council with effect from 21.7.1988 when the private respondents who were allegedly junior to him were promoted to the said post. He was not accorded this promotion at the relevant time as his services were terminated and thereupon he challenged the same by filing a writ petition bearing No.111/1976 before this Court which came to be allowed on 19.1.1984. The Division Bench appeal filed by the Municipal Council, Sri Ganganagar was also dismissed vide Annex.2 judgment dtd.27.3.1987. The petitioner was, thus, directed to be reinstated in service with full back wages. Implication of these judgments in favour of the petitioner is that the petitioner has to be treated in service throughout with all consequential benefits though the back wages were reduced to 50% by the Division Bench and accordingly, the petitioner was reinstated in service after the said judgment in his favour. 3. Be that as it may, there is no ground for denying promotion to the petitioner as Nakedar with effect from the date when his juniors SBCWP NO.5674/1994– MOTI LAL MAHENDRA V/S STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. . : JUDGMENT DATED 3.12.2008 3/4 who are private respondents No.4 to 10 in the present writ eptition were so promoted. The only ground given by the respondents in their reply that since at the relevant point of time, the petitioner was not in service, therefore, he was not promoted to the said post is no ground because once the petitioner was directed to be reinstated with back wages by this Court, there was no impediment in the way of the respondents to accord him promotion with effect from the date when his junior were promoted. In the opinion of this Court the petitioner is entitled to the relief as prayed for in the present writ petition. 4. Accordingly this writ petition is allowed and the respondent – Municipal Council, Sri Ganganagar is directed to accord promotion to the petitioner as Nakedar w.e.f. 21.7.1988, the date when his juniors were so promoted. The legal representatives of the petitioner shall be entitled to the consequential benefits which ensue to them in pursuance of these directions. The arrears of monetary benefits shall be paid to the LRs of the petitioner within a period of three months failing which the respondents shall pay interest @12% per annum. The interest so payable shall be borne by the person who is responsible for implementation of the said directions and the SBCWP NO.5674/1994– MOTI LAL MAHENDRA V/S STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. . : JUDGMENT DATED 3.12.2008 4/4 judgment of this Court , if the arrears are not paid within a period of three months from today. No order as to costs. (Dr.VINEET KOTHARI)J. Item No.2 Ss/-