{ 1 } S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9080/2008. (HUKAM SINGH VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.) DATE OF ORDER : 12.01.2009. HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J. Mr. Arjun Purohit for A.K. Acharya for the petitioner. The petitioner entered in the services of Rajasthan Police being appointed as Constable. His services were utilised in Motor Transport Beranch, accordingly an allowance was given to him. Under the order dated 05.08.1987, the respondents withdrew the petitioner from Motor Transport Branch and subsequent thereto utilised his services in General Branch. A challenge, by this petition for writ, is given to the decision aforesaid. It is also relevant to note that before approaching this Court, the petitioner submitted a representation to the Superintendent of Police, Jaisalmer, which was replied on 24.03.2006. As per the respondents, the services of the petitioner were found unsatisfactory in Motor Transport Branch and, therefore, he was withdrawn from that to General Branch. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the service of the petitioner was utilised for Motor Transport Branch, therefore, he should be continued in that Branch only. { 2 } I do not find any substance in the arguments advanced. The petitioner was appointed as General Constable and if the respondents because of some administrative exigency, utilised his services in Motor Transport Branch, that do not create any right in his favour to continue in that Branch. The petitioner is admittedly appointed and working in General Branch and as such his claim regarding allowance relating to Motor Transport Branch is having no merit. For the reasons stated above, this petition for writ is dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. Anil/