1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA N.4864/2008 IN FA ST.NO.8967/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 12th January, 2010. ... 1) Counsel for the appellant/original plaintiff absent. 2) There is delay of 163 days in filing the appeal. The Counsel for Zilla Parishad has stated that no proper reasons are assigned. The sufficiency of reasons is indicated int he application, and incidentally, the defendant has also filed FA No.1018/2007, seeking to challenge the decree. There is no harm if the delay is condoned and both the appeals are heard together. The applicant/original plaintiff has stated that he could not know about the verdict in time and, therefore, the delay has occasioned. Sufficient grounds, having 2 been explained, the delay is condoned. CA is allowed as above. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/ca4864.08