IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-37560 of 2010 Date of decision: 15.02.2011 Sanjay and others .. Petitioners Versus State of Haryana .. Respondent Present:- Mr.U.K.Agnihotri, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Harmeet Singh Deol, Addl.A.G., Haryana. * * * * S.S. SARON, J. Heard counsel for the parties. During the course of hearing, it is admitted position that Sanjay (petitioner No.1) has not been attributed any role. Deepak (petitioner No.2) has been arrested. Therefore, the petition qua him (Deepak) has been rendered infructuous. Anil (petitioner No.3) is attributed a lathi blow on the hand of the complainant-Thandi Ram and injury, it is stated, that a fracture in ulna was found. Rajbir (petitioner No.4) has not been attributed any role. The charge report (challan) in the case has been filed. The petitioners No.1, 3 and 4 were granted interim bail. Interim bail of Deepak (petitioner No.2) was declined as it was found that he inflicted a gandasi blow on the person of Balinder. He has since been arrested. The injury attributed to Anil (petitioner No.3) though is grievous but is on a non-vital part and his custody is not required for the purposes of investigation as challan in the case has already been filed. In the circumstances, the interim bail granted to petitioners No.1, 3 and 4 in terms of order dated 22.12.2010 is made absolute. The petition qua Deepak (petitioner No.2) stands dismissed being rendered infructuous. The criminal miscellaneous petition stands disposed of accordingly. (S.S. SARON) February 15, 2011 JUDGE sukhpreet