IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 8468 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 8468 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 8468 OF 2008 Shri Padmakar Ramchandra Petkar ... Petitioner. V/s. Shri Madhavrao Popatrao Jadhav and others. ... Respondents. A.S.Pratinidhi for the petitioner. Koshor Patil i/b. P.N.Joshi for the respondents. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 20th January 2009. DATED: 20th January 2009. DATED: 20th January 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent. 2. This petition is directed against the order dated 15th December, 2008 whereby the Sub-Divisional Officer, Nashik set aside the order dated 12th September, 2008 passed by the Tahasildar, Dindori Taluka, Nasik and remitted back the proceedings to the Tahasildar for deciding the same by 15th January, 2009. 3. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner extensively, no case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. The view taken is a reasonable and possible view. By this time, the Tahasildar must have decided the remanded proceedings. The rights of the parties are to be adjudicated by the Tahasildar. If the Tahasildar has not decided the remanded proceedings, he is expected to decide the same with expeditious despatch. All rival contentions are kept open. 4. With the aforesaid clarification, petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)