THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6163 of 2010 ORDER: This civil revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order dated 23.06.2010 passed by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Ibrahimpatan, Ranga Reddy District, dismissing the I.A. No. 115 of 2010 in O.S. No. 20 of 2008 filed by the petitioner herein, plaintiff in the suit, praying the Court below to appoint an advocate commissioner to survey the suit schedule property with the help of Mandal Surveyor and to note down its physical features. The petitioner filed the present suit for perpetual injunction against the respondents herein and he also filed an interlocutory application in I.A. No. 84 of 2008, for grant of ad-interim injunction in his favour, pending disposal of the suit. During the pendency of the said application, he filed the present petition for appointment of advocate commissioner to survey the suit schedule property with the help of Mandal Surveyor and to note down its physical features, on the ground that the respondents-defendants have taken a plea that they are in possession of the suit schedule land. Respondents-defendants contested the petition and the Court below, having considered the matter in detail, dismissed the petition, by the order under revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff and perused the order under revision and other material available on record. The petitioner admittedly filed the suit for perpetual injunction. In a suit for injunction, what the Court has to see is as to whether the plaintiff was in possession of the suit schedule property as on the date of filing of the suit and that he was sought to be dispossessed by the defendants. Having filed the suit for injunction, it is for the petitioner- plaintiff to produce oral and documentary evidence in support of his case and prima facie prove that he is in possession of the suit schedule property and the respondents-defendants were trying to dispossess him, and he cannot take the assistance of an advocate commissioner to collect evidence on his behalf. Therefore, no exception can be taken to the order passed by the Court below, dismissing the present petition filed by the petitioner-plaintiff for appointment of advocate commissioner. The civil revision petition is devoid of merit and is accordingly dismissed. No costs. __________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 20th January, 2011 IBL