IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1707 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 07.02.2011 Ajay Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Ram Kishan Gupta and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr. Shilak Ram Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondents. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J. (Oral) Office report dated 12.05.2010 reveals that respondents No.1, 4 and 5 have not been served and the report has intimated that they had died. Till today, no application for impleading their LRs has been filed. The record reveals that respondent No.1-Ram Kishan Gupta and Kurda Ram are the contesting respondents. Kurda Ram-respondent has not filed any revision as such respondents No.2, 3 and 4 being proforma respondents, their service is dispensed with. Even otherwise, none had appeared on behalf of respondents No.2 and 4 before the trial Court. Having perused the impugned order, the same is well founded that Parkash Narain-respondent No.10 had died on 13.02.2003. None of the LRs came for impleading them as LRs. Now the petitioner without impleading as LRs has moved the application for restoration of the appeal. Procedure is not correct. No ground to interfere is made out. Dismissed. February 07, 2011 (A.N.JINDAL) Gagan JUDGE