IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH MAY 2008 / 7TH JYAISHTA 1930 RP.No. 465 of 2008(W) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.6491/2008 Dated 29/02/2008 .................... PETITIONER: ---------------------------- AMBIKA, W/O.KARTHIKEYAN, AGED 45 YEARS, THEVATH VEETTIL, C.M.C. XIV, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.SAJEEV RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), TALUK OFFICE, CHERTHALA. 2. VILLAGE OFFICER, KOKKOTHAMANGALAM VILLAGE. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.R.SREELATHA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- R.P.465/2008 in W.P.(C).6491/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 28th day of May, 2008 ORDER I am satisfied that there is an error apparent on the face of the judgment in describing the petitioner as claiming the right over the property, which was proceeded against under the Revenue Recovery Act, as legal heir of one of the sons of the vendees under Ext.P1 and also in describing the petitioner as a widow. Apparently, the said status is applicable to the claimant in M.C.21/1999 on the file of the Family Court, Eranakulam, and not to the petitioner as such. In the result, the judgment is reviewed. The judgment dated 29.2.2008 in W.P.(C). 6491/2008 is recalled and the writ petition will be disposed of by a separate judgment. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs