IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 6TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 15TH BHADRA 1929 WP(C).No. 23719 of 2007(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER: SINDHU M.NAIR, AGED 35 YEARS, THEKKEMADATHIL HOUSE, VAYALA P.O., KOTTAYAM, NOW WORKING AS WORK SUPERINTENDENT, GRADE III, OVERSEER, KOTTAYAM MUNICIPALITY, THIRUVALLA. BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH B.MARAR SMT.LAKSHMI.N.KAIMAL RESPONDENTS: 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, (LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR,MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DIRECTOR, URBAN AFFAIRS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. P.S.VINOD, GRADE II OVERSEER, CHAVAKADU MUNICIPALITY. 5. J.GOPINATHAN NAIR, GRADE II OVERSEER, KOZHIKODE MUNICIPALITY. 6. RAJAN, GRADE II OVERSEER, VADAKARA MUNICIPALITY. 7. C.K.SUBRAHMANIAM, GRADE II OVERSEER, KALPETTA MUNICIPALITY. 8. S.D.SURESH, GRADE II OVERSEER, KOZHIKODE MUNICIPALITY. 9. T.V.RADHAKRISHNAN, GRADE II OVERSEER, KOZHIKODE MUNICIPALITY. 10. T.T.VIMAL KUMAR, GRADE II OVERSEER, KOZHIKODE MUNICIPALITY. 11. M.P.GOPALAKRISHNAN, GRADE II OVERSEER, PALA MUNICIPALITY. 12. G.BABU RAJAN, GRADE II OVERSEER, IRINJALAKUDA MUNICIPALITY. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.BIJOY CHANDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.23719 of 2007 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of September, 2007 JUDGMENT The grievance highlighted by the petitioner in Ext.P6 relates to what he claims to be the irregular promotion given to the contesting respondents 4 to 12. Ext.P6 is dated 4.8.2006. If the contentions raised in Ext.P6 are correct, it obviously merit remedial action by the respondents. 2. The third respondent shall consider and take appropriate action on Ext.P6, after hearing the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. If the third respondent feels that any other person would be affected by the action proposed to be taken on Ext.P6, then he shall hear such affected persons also before taking decision in that regard. The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. V.GIRI, JUDGE css/ : : : :