IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 90 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 90 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 90 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 113 OF 2008 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 69 OF 2008 IN SHORT CAUSE SUIT (STAMP) NO. 694 OF 2007 Jayesh H. Pandya ... Appellant (Org. Plaintiff) Vs M/s. Pharmadeal & Anr. ... Respondents (Org. Defendants) Mr. Robin Jaisinghani, Advocate, for Mrs.Jacinta D’Silva, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. G.S.Godbole, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mrs. Geeta Joglekar, Advocate for B.M.C. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 5th March,2008. DATE: 5th March,2008. DATE: 5th March,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The plaintiff, who has purchased the disputed property sometime in September, 2007 filed the suit seeking perpetual injunction against respondent No.1 and he also took out a Notice of Motion. The Notice of Motion is still pending, while the trial Court refused to grant ad-interim injunction. Against refusal to grant ad-interim injunction, the plaintiff has prefererd the present Appeal. After brief hearing, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order refusing to grant ad-interim relief, particularly when the Notice of Motion is yet to be heard. Therefore, the Appeal stands disposed of with the following directions :- The parties shall appear before the trial Court on 15.3.2008. If the defendants seek to file reply or additional reply to the Notice of Motion, they shall file the same within one week thereafter and the trial Court shall hear the parties and dispose of the Notice of Motion within three weeks thereafter. 3. As the Appeal itself is disposed of, the C.A. does not survive and stands disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)