IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 2ND AUGUST 2010 / 11TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 31806 of 2006(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- KASMAIL.V., THUPPASSERIL, CLAPPANA, KARUNAGAPPALLY. BY ADV. SRI.SHAIJAN C.GEORGE SRI.NOBLE MATHEW SRI.JACOB C.K RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 3. THE TAHASILDAR, KARUNAGAPPALLY. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. V. MANU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 31806 of 2006 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 2nd day of August, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner claims to have suffered very serious injuries in the Tsunami disaster, pursuant to which he is living a life of vegetable. According to the petitioner, although many others have been given very liberal compensation and other benefits, the petitioner is not being given the vary same benefits. The petitioner therefore has submitted Ext. P6 representation before the 1st respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pas orders on Ext. P6. 2. With the help of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the 1st respondent, the learned Government Pleader opposes the same. According to the learned Government Pleader, sufficient compensation has already been paid to the petitioner and an amount of Rs. 39,000/- has been received by him for treatment alone. The learned Government Pleader would further submit that the petitioner was allotted a house also. 3. I am not inclined to go into these disputed questions of fact. Whether the amount given to the petitioner is sufficient compensation as per the schemes framed by the Government is a matter to be considered by the Government themselves. But, I only say that the Government should consider Ext. P6 with the sympathy that the petitioner may deserve in view of the pathetic condition he is in. In the above circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P6 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month W.P.C. No. 31806/06 -: 2 :- from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, keeping in mind the observations made above. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.