IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11693/2008 Decided on:23.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Smt. Birma . …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. R.D. Kaundal, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ansul Bansal, Addl. A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner is seeking regularization since he has worked for more than ten years with 240 days in each calendar year, as per Annexure R-13. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization with all the consequential benefits, as per the policy framed for regularization in the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 year 2004, within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 23.12.2010 *awasthi*