THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI Writ Petition No. 7436 of 2010 Dated: 02.07.2010 Between: Sri P.Vijayanand, Hyderabad. … Petitioner And Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep., by its Deputy Commissioner, Hyderabad and 2 others. … Respondents THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 7436 of 2010 O R D E R : This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not taking any action on the petitioner’s representation dated 02.03.2010 complaining about the alleged illegal constructions being made by the 3rd respondent, is arbitrary and illegal. This Court, while directing rule nisi, by order dated 28.04.2010, directed that the 3rd respondent shall not construct the building except with the approval of the Municipal-Corporation. When the matter is taken up for consideration, it is brought to my notice by the learned standing counsel appearing for the Corporation Sri. R.Ramachandra Reddy that during pendency of this Writ Petition on consideration of the representation of the writ petitioner, the Corporation issued a notice to the 3rd respondent under Section 452 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’) followed by a final notice under Section 636 of the Act, dated 23.03.2010. At that stage, the 3rd respondent filed O.S.No. 1384 of 2010 in the Court of VI Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in which status quo was ordered in I.A.No. 285 of 2010. It is stated that the Civil Suit is still pending. Since the dispute raised by the petitioner is the subject matter of the proceedings pending before a competent Civil Court, no further enquiry is necessary in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of leaving it open to the parties to pursue the proceedings pending in the Civil Court. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. ​ ______________ Date: 02.07.2010 G. ROHINI, J KLP