IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1479 of 2008 KRISHNA MURARI SAHAY . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 3/ 25/08/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The directions in the writ petition were passed on basis of the judgement rendered in Secretary, State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi reported in AIR (2006) SC 1806 to consider regularization of a daily wage employee. In view of the law subsequently explained in (2010) 3 SCC 115 (State of Karnataka & Ors. Vs. Ianpathy Chaya Nayak & Ors.) that the benefit of regularization is not available to a daily wager and that they are outside the scope of the directions for a one-time consideration for regularization given in Uma Devi case (supra), this Court finds it difficult to proceed any further in the contempt jurisdiction. However, the respondents shall remain bound by the observations of their statutory obligations to provide for reservation for the disabled under The Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 in any fresh advertised post for filling vacancies. The application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)