IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 7TH OCTOBER 2010 / 15TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 26785 of 2009(P) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- A.C.CHINNAMMA, D/O.THE LATE THOMMAN CHACKO, AGED 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT `RESIDENCE ANNA', THALAYOLA PARAMBU P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 605. BY SRI.O.V.RADHAKRISHNAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE, ADVS. SMT.K.RADHAMANI AMMA, SRI.K.RAMACHANDRAN (THYKOODAM), SRI.S.S.ARAVIND. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL OFFICE, YOGAKHEMA, JEEVAN BIMA MARG, MUMBAI-400 021. 2. SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, NAGAMPADAM, KOTTAYAM-686 001. 3. BRANCH MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, BRANCH OFFICE, VAIKOM. R1 TO R3 BY ADVS. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN,S.C, SRI.K.JAGADEESH, SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/10/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.26785/2009-P: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 21/10/2004 ALONGWITH STATEMENT SHOWING THE DETAILS OF OMISSION IN DIRECT COMMISSION TO THE R.3. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE REMINDER LETTER DTD. 14/11/2005 OF THE PETITIONER TO THE R.3. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 08/03/2006 ALONGWITH STATEMENT SHOWING THE DETAILS OF OMISSION IN COMMISSION TO THE R.3. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 17/12/2008 ALONGWITH STATEMENT TO THE R.3. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 16/02/2009 OF THE PETITIONER TO THE R.3. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE STATEMENT SHOWING THE OMISSION IN COMMISSION IN RESPECT OF KGSD POLICIES DTD. 16/02/2009. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE STATEMENT SHOWING THE OMISSION IN DIRECT COMMISSION DTD. 16/02/2009. EXT.P.8: COPY OF THE STATEMENT SHOWING THE OMISSION IN COMMISSION IN RESPECT SSS POLICIES DTD. 16/02/2009. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.26785 OF 2009(P) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner claims to be an agent of Vaikom branch of the first respondent Corporation. In this writ petition, what is sought by the petitioner is a direction to the respondent to pay the agency commission due to her as per Exts.P6,P7 and P8. It is seen that such a claim has been made by the petitioner before the 3rd respondent under the cover of Ext.P5 representation and a decision has not been taken by the 3rd respondent so far. In that view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to decide on the claims of the petitioner for commission as per Exts.P6 to P8 submitted under the cover of Ext.P5 representation. This the 3rd respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :