c ^'i^^_ BEFORE THE HON-BLE HIGH COURT OF FHHATTT<;r:AR4 AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 3^^ ^ ^nno PETITIONER /,.."}^>.^ ^y^-^^" ...*•• t' e^y' '^••-"" RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1- 2- ^- -Sl ste B^ Shailendra Dongare S/o Sliri Late Shri Govind Ram Dongcire Aged <about 43 years, R/o Ward No. 8 Kalkapara Dongcirgarh District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secrefcary, Department of School Education D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, C.G. District Education Officer Rajnandgaon (C.G.) L^ ,f WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF MANDAMOUS. CERTITIORAY. OR DIRECTION OF LIKE NATURE The Petitioner named above most humbly submits as under:- r—78 •. 3^?T'SFT ftiTli<=b 'WT ^n^T ^wN? '^ET ^i^i^q, ^Ti1<-i^<o, T®i<ni^< .^G(s) *<l<4dl ^4j^,"—-^"—"T^"l"^—-—^F^200 ^n^T'q^F ( y<I^<si<i<iT) ^nw^rf?^STY^T S.B: HON'BLE JUSTICE IVSRj 27-07-2009: Mr.Jltendra Gupta, coul Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Dy.A4 Chailenge in the insta^t 14.7.2009 (Annexure P-1) pa^ the Detltioner has been tran^ferred Schooi, Badhivatola, Kumharwara Biock Chhuikhstdan, piace about 100 kms. away posting. Contention of the couns working as Upper Divislon, education of handicapped dated 28.10.1993 (Annexure where petltioner has bsen whereas in hls present pla^ assianed to the Detltloner Is to| to take care of them. He a!so State Government dated 11 .9 been transferred. He further piace ofthe petitioner. cr)N(<n<fli *iw<nl ^f fs<<) <F»I^I< ^^ffimSTT^T sel for the petjtloner. 'ocate Generai tbr the State. writ petitlon is to the order dated i^sed by the respondent No.2 by whlch from Govt. Higher Secondary Don^argarh to Govt. Mlddle School; i; District Rajnandgaron (C.G-), a jfrom the petitioners present piace of \e\ for the petltloner Is that petitloner is Te^cher and has taken special training for /d}sab!ed /dumb children vide certlficate P-3). He further submits that the place trai|isferred there are no handlcap chlidren ^e of postlng; duty which hss been llocate such handicap children and then Isubmits that as per the direction of the i, .91.1996, the petitioner ought nofr to have | ^ubmits thst no one has been posted !n i; 1+ ;:a^sXi-HC—78 'T^r '<ii^i<yi^, y>Ti1<i<i<o, f«idi-y^< *<l*RflT «t«11d» "W^ 200 ^I^T'l7^? ('jqI^^T) 3T^T'^t ^JGh 'TOT^H^T sn^iob ^ ^<TTW^f?^3T1^r Learned counsel for the make a representatlon before t wouid be decided in accordance [State sybmits that iet the petjtioner t|ie competent authority and the same with law. Accordlngly, the wrlt petl the petitioner to file representat 10 days from the date of receipl be decided by the authoritles three weeks from the date of its Tiil then the order impugned oetitlon.er shail be allowed t.o wc cni<<(<yi<flvi ^m^ ^ [k^<\ <P»1^1< ^r^tRwsiTT^r jlon Is disposed of with a directlon to |on to the authorities concerned vvlthjn of copy of thls order, the same wou!d jconcerned withln a further perlod of |recelpt strictly In accordance vwth law. .^hai! not be given effect to and the rk in hls present piace of posting.. Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge I.