R.S.A.No.149 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A.No.149 of 2009 Date of Decision : 20.8.2009 The Dhariwal Zimidara Co-op. ...Appellant Marketing-cum- Processing Society Limited Versus Nirmaljit Kaur and others ...Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. M.S.Bedi, Sr. Advocate, with Ms. Gauri Bedi, Advocate, for the appellant. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The plaintiff is in second appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below, whereby a suit for declaration that the plaintiff is owner in possession of the shop in dispute, was dismissed. It has been found by the Courts below that the shop in dispute is in fact purchased by the defendant-Gian Singh from one Ram Singh, vide sale deed dated 13.9.1967 and that the fact of purchase by Gian Singh is admitted by PW-8 Sansar Chand, Manager of the appellant- Society. Both the Courts have considered the entire evidence to return a concurrent finding of fact that the plaintiff has failed to prove any document of ownership, whereas, the defendants are proved to be owner R.S.A.No.149 of 2009 2 of the same, on the basis of sale deed dated 13.9.1967. The plaintiff has not produced any document of title in respect of shop in dispute. In view of the said fact, I do not find that any substantial question of law arises for consideration by this Court in second appeal. Dismissed. 20.8.2009 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE