IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.4856 OF 2010 Between : B.Ramakka .... PETITIONER A N D The United India Insurance Company Ltd., …RESPONDENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.4856 OF 2010 O R D E R: This Civil Revision Petition, under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 (for short, ‘C.P.C’) is directed against the order, dated 06.10.2010, in E.A.No.102 of 2010 in E.P.No.19 of 2010 in O.P.No.348 of 2008 on the file of Additional District Judge, Hindupur, whereunder and whereby, the application, filed under Section 151 C.P.C., to raise the attachment made in respect of the petition schedule property (viz., tractor), was dismissed. 2. Heard. 3. The decree has become final by virtue of order, dated 14.09.2009. Thereafter, the insurance company was directed to pay the amount and recover the same from the insured i.e, the petitioner herein on the ground that the petitioner has violated the conditions of the policy. In pursuance of the decree, the insurance company deposited the entire amount towards full satisfaction of decree in O.P.No.348 of 2008. Thereafter, the insurance company filed Execution Petition for attachment for schedule property of petitioner herein. As per the decree, the respondent herein can proceed against the owner of the offending vehicle to recover the amount. It is not shown how the order of attachment is illegal, except saying that the entire family of the petitioner is depending on the income being derived from the vehicle. This is not a ground to raise the attachment order. Hence, there are no grounds to interfere with the same. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU, J NOVEMBER 29, 2010. YVL