IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6206 of 2010 1. SMT. SHAKUNTALA DEVI @ SHAKUNTALA SINHA W/O SRI RAM NANDAN SINGH R/O MOHALLA- PAHARPUR (NEAR HOSPITAL), P.S. NAGARNAUSHA, DISTT.- NALANDA 2. MISS PUJA @ POOJA KUMARI D/O SRI LAKSHMAN SHARMA R/O MOHALLA- CHANDMARI ROAD, AZAD PATH, P.S. KANKARBAGH, DISTT.- PATNA 3. RACHANA KUMARI W/O RAJ KISHORE PRASAD R/O VILL.- HAKIMGANJ (MAHESHPUR), P.O. JHAUGANJ, P.S. MAHEDIGANJ, DISTT.- PATNA _______ Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR IN CHIEF, HEALTH SERVICES GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 3. THE BIHAR COLLEGE OF PHYSIOTHERAPY OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, FACULTY OF MEDICINE PATNA UNIVERSITY, VIKLANG BHAWAN HOSPITAL, KANKARBAGH, PATNA- 800020, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS HEAD OF DEPARTMENT-CUM-CONTROLLER 4. THE HEAD OF DEPARTMENT, BIHAR COLLEGE OF PHYSIOTHERAPY OF OCCUPATION THERAPY VIKLANG BHAWAN HOSPITAL, KANKARBAGH, PATNA-800020 _______ Respondents ----------- 03. 7.3.2011 The claim of the petitioners for payment of honorarium is based on notification dated 17.9.2009, contained in Annexure-4. However, in the counter affidavit serious dispute has been raised in the manner in which Annexure-4 came to be issued as also the annulment order passed by the same authority on 22.9.2009 contained in Annexure-A. Obviously there is many a things which are amiss for which claim is being made by the petitioners with regard to the work they have done. With the kind of pleadings and the dispute, no direction can be issued in favour of the petitioners. The writ application is dismissed. 2 However, the petitioners may pursue their claim with the respondents if so advised. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)