THE HONOURABLE Smt. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI C.C No.293 of 2010 Date: 29.4.2010 Between: M/s. Sravanthi Constructions Pvt. Limited, rep., by its Director. …. Petitioner and 1. R. Chalapathi Rao and others. ….Respondents THE HONOURABLE Smt. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI C.C. No.293 of 2010 ORDER: The present contempt case is filed alleging violation of the orders passed by this Court in C.R.P.No.1875 of 2008, dated 28.5.2008. On 30.4.2008, this Court has initially granted status-quo order, which was subsequently made absolute on 28.5.2008. The main grievance of the petitioner in this contempt case is that the respondents have been interfering with his possession over the property in question by dumping huge construction material and thereby violating the status-quo order. He also filed certain photographs on 6.2.2010 in order to show that such construction material has been dumped on the property in question. Hence, he filed the present contempt case seeking appropriate directions. This Court had an occasion to go through the photographs, which were filed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner. On a perusal of the photographs, it is seen that huge construction material has been dumped on the property in question and certain persons are also found to be working thereat. Under the above circumstances, on 23.4.2010 this Court while adjourning the matter to 27.4.2010 directed the 1st respondent to remove all the construction material dumped on the disputed property, pending disposal of the contempt case. Learned Counsel for the petitioner contends that even though the status quo order is in force, the respondents have dumped the construction material and thereby violated the orders of this Court granted in the above CRP. He further stated that the C.R.P. filed against the order in the C.M.A. No. 31of 2008 has been allowed by a learned single judge of this Court on 28.4.2010, wherein a clear finding has been recorded that the petitioner is in possession of the suit schedule property. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the respondents contended that the allegations made by the petitioner are not correct. He further stated that the respondents have not acted in any manner, which amounts to violation of the status-quo order granted by this Court . Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Today, when the contempt case has come up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the 1st respondent has filed a counter-affidavit while denying the various allegations levelled by the petitioner. He further stated that there is no construction material on the site and the site is totally clear. The respondent also asserted that he would not claim any equities in the case. It is also stated that the respondent No.1 and the other respondents have been obeying the status quo order scrupulously and they never violated the same. He also tendered his unconditional apology. In view of the averments made in the counter-affidavit and while accepting the unconditional apology tendered by the 1st respondent, this contempt case is closed. No costs. __________________ T. Meena Kumari,J Date:29th April, 2010 pnb