IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2008 / 7TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 10334 of 2008(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ MAHENDRAN P.T., PAZHUKKAMODIYIL KIZHAKKECHARIVIL, PENNUKKARA P.O. CHENGANNUR, ALAPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE CHENGANNUR BLOCK PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, CHENGANNUR, ALAPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. SECRETARY, CHENGANNUR BLOCK PANCHAYATH, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 3. OMBUDSMAN FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. SURESHKUMAR, JAYANDA BHAVANAM, PENNUKKARA P.O., CHENGANNUR. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 10334 of 2008 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of March , 2008 JUDGMENT Under challenge in this Writ Petition is Ext.P1 order issued by the Ombudsman for Local Self Government Institutions. In Ext.P1 the Ombudsman has directed the petitioner, who was the convener of the beneficiary committee appointed for making constructions on the basis of some beneficiary scheme, to give an undertaking to the effect that the work will be completed within the time frame. One of the prayers in the writ petition is a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to extend the time frame fixed by the Ombudsman. I dispose of the writ petition directing the petitioner to move the learned Ombudsman himself seeking appropriate reliefs by way of review/modification/extensions. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE dpk