IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.173 of 2009 MAJIDA KHATOON & ORS Versus SHEIKH ABDULLAH & ANR ----------- 4 9.4.2009 The petitioners are aggrieved by the quantum of maintenance granted to them by order dated 24.6.2008 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Siwan in Misc. Case No.99 of 2007. Learned Principal Judge by the impugned order directed the Opposite party Shekh Abdullah to pay maintenance of Rs.800/- per month to petitioner no.1 Majida Khatoon and Rs.250/- each per month to petitioners 2 and 3, who are her minor children payable from the date of the order, within first week of every succeeding English Calendar. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the quantum of maintenance awarded to them is much less in proportion to the amount which the Opposite party earns in Arab Country. He further submits that the Opposite party has re-married and keeping a second wife. It appears from the impugned order that the learned Principal Judge has observed that the petitioners have not filed any document or a chit of paper in support of their contentions that the Opposite party earns Rs.60,000/- per month in Arab Country or has any land and Truck as alleged by them. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere 2 KHAN with the impugned order passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Siwan. This application is accordingly dismissed. However, in case the petitioners get hold of any documentary evidence in support of their assertion that the Opposite Party Sheikh Abdullah is earning handsome salary in the Arab Country, they may, if so advised, file an application under section 127(1) Cr.P.C. (S.P.Singh,J)