IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 7TH OCTOBER 2008 / 15TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 29585 of 2008(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- KANNIATH DINACHANDRAN, S/O.NANU, AGED 48 YEARS, PALAKKANDI HOUSE, IRITTY, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.CIBI THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KEEZHUR-CHVASSERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PUNNAD, IRITTY, KAINNUR. 2. PANCHARAYIL MUHAMMED, PANCHARAYIL, IRITTY.P.O, KEEZHUR, KANNUR DISTRICT. 3. RUFSHEEDA, C/O. MOIDEEN, MINA GOLD SOOK, NEAR POST OFFICE, IRITTY. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY, DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. G.P. SHRI.K.V.MANOJ KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.29585 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 7th day of October, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext.P4 stop memo whereby the petitioner has been interdicted from continuing the constriction activities in his properties. I am of opinion that after having issued Ext.P4 stop memo, the 1st respondent has a duty to pass final orders in the matter. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to pass final orders pursuant to Ext.P4, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as respondents 2 and 3. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2