IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13618 of 2011 HARSHADITYA JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 11.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 498-A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 /4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The accusation is that the petitioner and other forcefully entered into the house of the complainant. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the occurrence took place on 26.01.2003 for which complaint was filed on 14.02.2003. Moreover, the house in question belongs to the petitioner's side. It appears that there is a serious land dispute between the parties and other accused persons have been granted bail by the learned court below. I see no reason for learned court below not to give the same privilege to the petitioner. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner, if petitioner surrenders within a period of four weeks from the receipt of a copy of this order and prays for regular bail, if possible on the same day. 2 With above observations, the application is disposed off in connection with complaint case bearing CR No. 141 of 2003, Tr. No. 2196 of 2011 pending in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga. Let the order be transmitted to the learned court below through FAX at the cost of petitioner. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)