un' 93 Versus Amit Singh Walia, rtgeu z; years, >on of Shri Lekhraj VValia, iy piOTOSSiGii; AdVOCStQ, Resident of Civil ijnes. - Raipur (C.G.) SViaiitSti YSQ^V, Aged 29 years, ion of Shri Bishambhar Yadav, Sy profession Advocate, Kes" F^s^<3; /.f^t /tl \ r\aipur ^.^-s.jF Union of India, Through ihe Secre'iary', yinistrv of Environment and Forests, Government of India, Paryavaran Bhawran, CGO Complex, Lodh' Road, NewDelhi-110003 The.StateofC.G, Through th®Secreta'y Ministry of Environment and Forest; Government of Chhaffisaarh. Mantralav. Kaipur ^.u.) 10 ( Chh^lsycEiii Envh'orii'iiorit Conservation Board. 14/3, Park Stt'eet, Choubey Coloney, Rslpuf (C.G.) The Coliector, Korba (C.G.) South Eastern Coa! Fields Limlted. hsviuQ. its fQcisterQd Office at Sipat Road, Biiaspur, 495 006, District Bilaspur, Thi'OUgh itS Oh8lriTi3H Sild Manaaing Director. '-^^f-trw-ast SS-^-LA: •-..r y; AAfr- -1-^y '"^?. 94 -z- Shri B.P. Sharma, learned counsel forthe petitioners. Shri Bhishma Kinger, iearned Standing counse! for respondent No.l/.Union of India Shrj Prashant Mishra, learned Addl. A.G. for the State/ I'espondents 2 and 4. ihri V.V.S. Murthv, learned Sr. Advocate with Shri Hemant Ct.^i^...-,s fi..S./^-Lg. i^_^,,.»,^^ ,n.^;;~_^Al ^.-,E- E.^in^.,^",.-^."l;^ M.o. •f3 o^iaputivdi, is<,Aisite^( t/^yiiac;i li/f s^spyuuyiu i^i^.^. (OF on 13th The foilowing order of the Court was passed by T|^Q OQtltiOHOfS 3F9 Or@Ct!C!HQ A-dvo03t©S IH th9 St^tO of Chhattisciarh 3nd thQv hsv^ institutsd this writ D^titiQH IQ osoouss th9 ni'btic CBUSS. The comDl^int bfoiiQht boforo the Couft bv W3V of this Dublic inter8st tit!Q3tion, to Dut it in brief, is th^t not^vithst^nd no oondition No.2-"B fvili ? imnosod bv thc GovornDi^nt of Indla. K4tnistp/ of Environmont ^nd Forssts, Nov/ DslhL whils Qfantin^ ^HvironmsHt^i clQ3f^HCQ to respondent No.5 for its Dipika Opencast Mining Expansion Project, "ide ^4inistrv/'s i^ttor d^ted 04/1 Q/20Q4. ths tr^nsDortQrs hav€' b8en tr^nsDortinQ ths cosi ^nd 003 -3sh n trucks w thout COVQHPQ ths sanis bv tarpau!in. In that view of ths mstter, they have sought for a d'rection to tho Govsrn^iont of ChhsttisQafh to ^nsurs dnj9 comoii^nco of ths sbovB noted condit'on No.2-B (vjii), (2) Both In tefms of ths condit'on impossd bv th^ Govsmmsnt of India and even othewise having regard to the concern of the socisty for increased pollution and its impact on the rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitutlon.no objection cou'd be taSten to the relief souaht bv th^ two Advocatss ^s .oro bono Dublic ch9jacters. In th^tviow '^ h» ^- 95 -"s gf fh@ .?T?gff,ar- w9 diSDOS9 of this writ D©titiopdirsctina Govcfnment of Chh^tti$Q3fh f©or9s$ntedbv ths SccrQt^r1/, Min stn/ of Environtn^nt ^nd Forest, to ensure due comp'iance of condition No.2 {\f!!l) Imposed by the Govefnment of ipdis; Mlnistfy of EnviroHiTtsiit and Forests, N©wD9lhi, whiie granting enyironmental clearance to respondent No.5 for its Dipika Op^ncsst Minin^ Exp^nslon ProJQCt, vide Minisfry's tettGf dsted 04/10/2004. Nocosts. Sd/- ^eChiefJustice Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge 9'A*^ -—-m, ^Ctll; ^•).-' IflC llEt1 r-" \:\ ^__.f_^.l:^.!::,-. /' Aftf~] ;<— :-l!t-LlS >r-WT=lT3='PC3ff^^^2E EE^SE'