C-^- 1 INTHE HONLBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) rcontempt Case (0 No.......\?.}\..../99) Sia. Beas» PETITIONER Sudarshan Das Vasihnav S/o D. D. .^\»\ ^3" "^ '?^T .;^ .^' !\^-^ Vasihnav, Aged About - 56 Year, R/o > ^-ll Village Kungedabari, Tah. & Distt.- ;^ RESPONDENTS CONTEMNORS Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Nand kumar Secretary School Education Department D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Bibiyana Tkky Under Secretary School Education Department ,D.k.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) CONTENPT CASE fC) UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 3II^?[^iT •M^3''^ •giTIWdftcI Deepii Manindra MohAn Shrivastava, j. -s^^ffVvPf, v^\ww, l««ni*iy '(iTqflT chlich vc^ Z^^e^^J^^/^ 3IR?I'?%IW^rf?n •ti^ici^-i 4i'4cti'?fel<a <^^i< ^T SlfSTO 311^1 Shri Vineet Kumar Pandey, ijsounsel for the petitioner. Learned counsei for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the contempt petition, the State Go' for grant of benefit in accordance those cases, which relates to grai /ernment has issued an order on 5/1/2011 with the orders passed by this Court in \\t of benefit passed in the case of Ram Kumar Sahu and others v. St^te Government of Chhattisgarh and another, in W.P.(s) No.813/07. [Therefore, in these circumstances, the petitioner does not wish to press thi^ petition. Having considered the subntissions made by iearned counsel for the petitioner and the statement that fhe order has been issued by the State Government in compiiance of the i(>rder passed by this Court, the prayer is aiiowed and the petition is Dermittecjto be withdrawn. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [-Tt^Sfeq \,