CO ATURE OF MANDAMUS \ C2) «LWGV A” IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH A .G. w. p. (S) No. C;Z\$ of 2011 PETITIONER ‘ RESPONDENTS VERSUS / Mithilesh Kumar Choudhari S/o Jhumuk Lal Choudhari, age 4O years, Occupation—Suspended Shiksha Karmi Class—II, R/o Village-Pankota, Tahsil—Pendramad, District—Bilaspur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat, D.K.S. ‘Bhavvan, Raipur (C.G.). Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Bilaspur, District— Bilaspur (C.G.) wRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE NSTITUTION T BILASPUR \‘QJ N OF INDIA TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE fg HIGH (30URT (3F GHHATTtSGARH AT BILA$PUR (Hon. Mr. Jugtica Pri‘tinker Diwaker) \N.P{$). No. 6213 of 2M1 Pefitmner Mithilesh Kumar Choudhari VERSUS Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and anather Present: Shri Sudhir Verma, counsel for the petitioner. $‘hri Chandresh Shrivastava, PL for the $tate/respondent N0.1. G R 3 E R ((34.11.2011) ShFi Verma $ubmit$ that after the i$suance of suspensicn order dated 01.02.2011, an enquiry was conducted and in tha said enquiry. the petitioner has been exonerated but tiH date. he hae not been reinstated. 2 Learned State couneel pointe out that if the petitioner hae been exonerated, he is at iiberty to approach the authorities by filing an appropriate representation. n o‘. The present petition is disposed ot with a direction to the petitioner to file a representation before respondent No.2 within three weeks from today and in the eventuality of ftting of the same, it is expected from the said authorities to decide the same within a further period of two months. 4. it ie made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authorities concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation strictly in accordance with law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge Priya l l i Laue