IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6888 of 1991 WITH SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5006 OF 1991 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- REKHABEN HARISHBHAI BHATT Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PARESH UPADHYAY for Petitioner No. 1 MR SN SHELAT, ADVOCATE GENERAL with MR MUKESH PATEL for Respondent No. 1-2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI Date of decision: 30/07/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Learned Advocates for the petitioners submitted that, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners may approach the respondent authority with a request to consider their case sympathetically and the respondent authority may be directed to consider their representation sympathetically in view of the peculiar facts of the case. 2. Accordingly it is directed that if the petitioners make a representation for regularisation of their services, the concerned respondent shall consider their case sympathetically. The petitioners shall make their representation within a period of two weeks from today and the respondent authority shall decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 3. Subject to the above direction, the petitions are disposed of. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. [K.S. JHAVERI, J.] *ar*