Writ Petition No. 974 (SS) of 2006 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Interim Relief Application No. 8924 of 2006 Heard Sri Syed Nadim, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri M.C. Agarwal, learned standing counsel for Union of India on behalf of respondents. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted the controversy raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 10.03.2006 passed by this court in Writ Petition No. 351 (SS) of 2006 (Khim Raj Vs. Union of India and others), as such, the present writ petition may be disposed of on the same terms and observations made in the aforesaid judgment. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is finally disposed of on the same terms and observations made in the judgment and order dated 10.03.2006 passed by this court in Writ Petition No. 351 (SS) of 2006 (Khim Raj Vs. Union of India and others). Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) 18.07.2006 S.K.S