IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 11475 of 2009 Between: 1 Sri Satya Sai Enclave Flat Owners Welfare Association represented by its General Secretary N.Anjaiah S/o.Late Srihari R/o. Flat No.402, Sri satya Sai Enclave, Durga Nagar Colony, Sagar Main Road, Kharmanghat, Hyderabad. 2 D.Yadav Reddy S/o.Linga Reddy R/o. Flat No.110, Sri satya Sai Enclave, Durga Nagar Colony, Sagar Main Road, Kharmanghat, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, represented by its Commissioner, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner, L.B.Nagar Circle, The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents in keeping representation of the petitioner Association pending months together, without taking any action is arbitrary and illegal, unjust and unfair and consequentially direct the 1st and 2nd Respondents to consider the representations of the petitioners' submitted on 15.7.2008 and 26.5.2009 forthwith for removing illegal constructions in cellar and stilt area of the Satya Sai Enclave Durga Nagar Colony, Sagar Main Road, Kharmanghat, Hyderabad. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.SURESH KUMAR POTTURI Counsel for the Respondents: R.RAMACHANDRA REDDY,SC FOR MCH The Court made the following ORDER: HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No.11475 of 2009 ORDER: The first petitioner herein is an Association of the flat owners of Sri Satya Sai Enclave, Durga Nagar Colony, Sagar Main Road, Kharmanghat, Hyderabad. It is alleged that the builders of Sri Satya Sai Enclave, by name, Satish Reddy and P.Hemalatha, having constructed shops in cellar and stilt areas in contravention of Clause-9 of the guidelines issued by the Corporation, made an application for regularization of the same. Since there is no parking facility, the flat owners apprehended that in case the illegal constructions are regularized, it would result in lot of inconvenience to the occupants and accordingly, they made a representation to the second respondent on 15.07.2008 followed by another representation, dated 26.05.2009. Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in considering the said representations, the present writ petition is filed. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri R.Ramachandra Reddy, the learned Standing Counsel for MCH, appearing for the respondents. The learned Standing Counsel, under instructions, stated that since the request made by the builders for regularization is still under consideration, the Corporation would consider the representations of the flat owners of the Sri Satya Sai Enclave, before taking a final decision. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioners, dated 15.07.2008 and 26.05.2009, before passing any orders on the application made by the builders of Sri Satya Sai Enclave for regularization of the unauthorized constructions made at premises bearing No.10-1-96/1/E, Ward No.10, Block No.4, Lingogiguda, Durga Nagar, Saroor Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. No costs. _____________ G.Rohini, J Dt.15.06.2009 VGB