IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID THURSDAY, THE 8TH DECEMBER 2011 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32664 of 2011(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- ANIL KUMAR, MULAMOOTTIL,NAMBIARU KAVALA, ALUMKADAVU P.O,KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT PIN 690 573 BY ADV. MR.N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION' REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN,FORT P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 023 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695 001 ADV.MR.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA, SC FOR R1. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.M.MUHAMMED SHAFI FOR R2. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 32664 of 2011(G) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: APPOINTMENT MEMO DTD. 3.5.2000 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2: ORDER DTD. 17.10.2007 ISUED BY R1. EXT.P3: LETTER DTD. 10.11.2010 OF R1 SENT TO GOVERNMENT. EXT.P4: MEMORANDUM DTD. 26.4.2011 ISSUED BY R1. EXT.P5: REPRESENTATION DATED 5.11.2011 OF THE PETITIONER SENT TO R2. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL ..... // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE. HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 32664 of 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of December, 2011. J U D G M E N T The writ petition is filed for a direction commanding the 2nd respondent to issue orders to regularise the service of the petitioner with effect from 15.10.2007 as done in the case of similarly situated persons, to dispose of Ext.P6 representation and for other incidental reliefs. 2. Petitioner is an employee in the service of the 1st respondent Corporation. The matter relates to the regularisation of the petitioner in the service of the respondent Corporation. Petitioner pointed out that the Corporation finalised a list of temporarily eligible employees for regularisation to the Government and that, even though, the petitioner is also eligible for regularisation, the Corporation omitted to include the name of the petitioner in the list. The petitioner made complaint for non- inclusion of his name in the list. The Government called for remarks of the Corporation. Then the Corporation issued Ext.P4 additional list of 14 conductors, omitted to be included earlier, for W.P.(C) No.32664/2011 ::2:: regularisation, including the name of the petitioner. Some of them filed writ petition No.11959/2008. This Court directed the Government to regularise the petitioners, if they are similarly situated as in the case of 144 conductors regularised earlier. It is pointed out that pursuant to the direction issued by this Court , the Government issued orders regularising them also w.e.f. 15.10.2007. Thereafter, based upon the Government Order, the Corporation issued Ext.P4 order dated 26.4.2011 regularising 3 conductors included in the additional list. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that though the petitioner was included in the list, service was not regularised while service of three others in the same list were regularised. 4. When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Ext.P5 representation is pending consideration before the 2nd respondent and requests this Court to issue a direction commanding the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P5 representation within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. W.P.(C) No.32664/2011 ::3:: In the above circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P5 representation, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE. bkn/-