1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.06.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD)No.6346 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 K.Judin : Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Tuticorin District. 2.The Additional Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Udangudi, Tuticorin District. 3.The Correspondent, M.M.Middle School, Seythunganallur, Tuticorin District. : Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to release salary to the petitioner from 01.06.2010 as per the approval order dated 01.04.2011 and continue to pay the salary, by considering the representation dated 28.05.2011 and confer all the consequential benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Panneerselvam For M/s.C.S.Associates For Respondents 1&2 : Mr.S.Chandrasekar Government Advocate For Respondent No.3 : Mr.K.Hema Karthikeyan ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 and 2 and the learned counsel appearing for the third respondent. 2. By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final hearing. 3. The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition for a Mandamus, directing the respondents to release the salary to her from 01.06.2010, as per the approval order dated 01.04.2011 and continue to pay the salary, by considering her representation dated 28.05.2011 and confer all the consequential benefits. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. The case of the petitioner, in nutshell, is stated hereunder: She has passed B.A.(History) in the year 1995 and B.Ed., in the year 1996. Thereafter, she has passed M.A.(History) in the year 1999. She was selected and appointed as B.T.Assistant (History) in the third respondent School on 05.06.2008. The Educational Authorities approved her appointment with effect from 01.06.2010, by proceeding dated 01.04.2011. Even after approval, the salary has not been paid to her, in spite of fact that the third respondent has claimed salary for her. Hence, the petitioner made a representation dated 28.05.2011 to the respondents. Nevertheless, the request of the petitioner was not considered and hence, she has come up with the present Writ Petition for the reliefs stated earlier. 5. It is not in dispute that the petitioner's appointment was approved with effect from 01.06.2010, by proceeding dated 01.04.2011 of the Educational Authorities. After approving her appointment, respondents 1 and 2 cannot deny the salary to the petitioner. 6. Taking such view, I direct the second respondent to consider the grievance of the petitioner, as put forth by her, in her representation dated 28.05.2011, in the light of the observation made above. The said exercise has to be carried out, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. The Writ Petition stands ordered accordingly. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (LA) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Tuticorin District. 2.The Additional Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Udangudi, Tuticorin District. +one cc to Special Government Pleader, Sr.No. 20396 Order made in W.P.(MD)No.6346 of 2011 SML SMA/08.7.2011/4C/2P Dated:- 27.06.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/