IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 16TH JANUARY 2009 / 26TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 1776 of 2009(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- KATHREENA CLEETUS , AGED 52 YEARS W/O. CLEETUS, KADEPPARAMBIL HOUSE PUTHENPALLI, VARAPUZHA PO, VARAPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE SRI.A.V.JOJO RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, PARAVUR. 2. VILLAGE OFFICER, VARAPUZHA VILLAGE OFFICE, VARAPUZHA. GOVT.PLEADER SMT.SUDHADEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/01/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 1776 OF 2009 (J) ==================== Dated this the 16th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T The mutation sought for by the petitioner has been rejected by Ext.P4. It is this order which is under challenge. 2. According to the petitioner, she purchased 7.5 cents of land in Sy.No. 343/9A of Varapuzha Village. However, in Ext.P4, on the basis of the report of the Village Officer, and on inspection, the 1st respondent has found that the property of which mutation is sought for by the petitioner, is part of 41 cents of land in Sy.No.343/9, which is the subject matter of AS 220/03 now pending before this Court. It was in view of this that mutation has been declined. 3. In view of the above factual finding in Ext.P4, this Court will not be justified in directing that mutation be effected. Writ petition fails and is dismissed without prejudice to the remedies that are available to the petitioner. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp