IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.795 of 2011 1. THE CHAIRMAN INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. CORPORATE OFFICE 3079/3 J.B. TITO MARG, SADIQ NAGAR, NEW DELHI. 2. THE DIRECTOR MARKETING, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. MARKETING DIVISION HEAD OFFICE, INDIAN OIL BHAWAN, G-9, ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG, BANDRA (EAST) MUMBAI-400015. 3. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (LPG), INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. MARKETING DIVISION, G-9, ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG, BANDRA (EAST), MUMBAI-400015. :---PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS. IN THE WRIT APPLICATION. Versus 1. SILAS AIND, SON OF LATE PAULUS AIND, RESIDENT OF FLAT NO. AC-3H, 9TH PHASE, ADARSH NAGAR, SONARI, POLICE STATION SONARI, JAMSHEDPUR, DISTRICT- SANCHBHUM EAST, JHARKHAND, PRESENTLY POSTED AS SENIOR MANAGER (LPG). INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD., BIHAR STATE OFFICE, LOK NEYAK JAI PRAKASH BHAVAN, DAK BUNGLOW, CHAURAHA, POLICE STATION- PATNA (KOTWALI) PATNA :--- OPPOSITE PARTY 1ST PETITIONER IN THE WRIT APPLICATION. 2. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS, SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI. :--OPPOSITE-PARTY 2ND (PROFORMA)- RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT APPLICATION. ----------- 2. 09.03.2011. Counsel for the Indian Oil Corporation with reference to the averments made in the modification application states that in the light of the orders of this Court dated 04.10.2010 passed in C.W.J.C.No. 16807 of 2010 the suspension of the petitioner has been revoked. Charge- sheet in compliance of the said order, however, has not been served on the writ-petitioner as till date the authorities are not able to make up - 2 - their mind whether to serve any charge-sheet on the writ-petitioner and they shall decide about serving the charge-sheet on the writ- petitioner in the light of the findings arrived at by the C.B.I. authorities who are investigating the matter. In view of the submission made by the counsel for the Indian Oil Corporation, this modification application is disposed of observing that the authorities of the Indian Oil Corporation may decide about service of the charge-sheet on the writ- petitioner in the light of the findings of the C.B.I. authorities but until then they should not deprive the writ- petitioner of his rightful service claims. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)