LOK ADALAT Cliliattisearli Hush Court CampusLBUaspur FIKST APPEAL N0. 49/2004 AEpellant/plaintyf Respoadeats/Defendants s/o Hetram ^ed about 56 years Janakram Sahu, Occupation Service Teacher, R/o Indra Colony, Kasdol, Tahsfl Kasdol, District-Raipur (CG) 1. Maugturaia aged 45 years son of Ram Bharos Sahu, Resident of Village-Beltikari, Tehsil- Bilaigarh, District-Raipur 2. Hiraniati aged 40 years, wife of Maagturam Resident of ViUage- Beltikari, Tahsil-BiIa^arh, Distnct Raipur 3. Sheshdeo Sahu aged 50 years, Head Constable PoUce Station Urla, District-Raipur 4. State of Cbhattisgarh Through: CoUector- Raipur Appearaace:- AppeIlant-Hetram is picsent in person along with Shri Rakesh Pandey, Advocate. Respondent-Maagturam is also present ia person. None for otber respondents. AWARD (Passed on 07.04.2007) Two appUcations have been filed in fhis case, which have been received froia fhe Registry. Let it be kept on record. The appeUant has filed an appMcation for disnussal of his appeal, statuig that the relations between the parties have becoiae cordial; fherefore, he does not want to prosecute this appeal any niore. F.A.No.49/2004 (2) 'l"!ii.iiSiiia S; ^•Sf"—wV^ '"^WK^^SltM Record perused. It appears that a suit for inaUcious prosecution was filed by fhe appeUaat, which has been disinissed by fhe trial Court, against which, fbis appeal has been filed. There appears to be no iinpediment ia withdrawal of this appeal at the iastance of the appeUaitt himself. The prayer is inade before fhis Lok Adalat by way of the ippUcation dated 7.4.2007. The application dated 7.4.2007 is atlowed. The appeal is disxaissed as not pressed. Sd/- Sd/- [da'ist i Msmber • I-.OK ""•°"*';. iSiintiKu-mai-Siniiai ^^ Member-LokAdaiat tigh Court of Chhaitisgarh BiLASPUR \Higi —iuiAN