IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 15506 of 2009 Between: 1 Sri Boddupally Ashok @ Chakali Ashok, S/o. Late Balaiah, R/o. Muniganur (V), Hayathanagar (M) Ranga Reddy District. 2 Sri Boddupally Raju @ Chakali Ashok, S/o. Late Balaiah, R/o. Muniganur (V), Hayathanagar (M) Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector, R.R.District Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranga Reddy East Division, Goshamahal, Hyderabad. 3 The Tahasildar, Hayathnagar (M), R.R.District. 4 Smt. Dubbaka Ramulamma, W/o.Rangaiah, R/o. 18-9-191/1, Chandrayanagutta, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to declare and impugned order dated 03.01.2009 passed in proceedings No.C/2900/2008 by the 3rd respondent as per the instructions of the 1st respondent as arbitrary, illegal, null and void and consequently restore the land admeasuring Ac.8.00 gts in Survey no.38/1 on Munuganur (V), Hayathanagar (M), R.R.DIstrict to the petitioners Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.SHAIK ANWAR PASHA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.NO.15506 OF 2009 ORAL ORDER What is challenged is the order dated 03-01-2009 in proceedings No.C/2900/2008 of the 3rd respondent resuming land of an extent of Ac.8.00 in Sy.No.38/1 of Munuganur Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District under the provisions of A.P. Assigned Land (Prohibition of Transfers) Act,1977 ( for short “the Act”) and the Rules thereunder. The petitioners have an appellate remedy before the Revenue Divisional Officer, under Section 4-A of the Act. In the circumstances, this court is not inclined to entertain judicial review of the order of the 3rd respondent dated 03.01.2009. Relegating the petitioners to pursue the appellate remedy under Section 4-A of the Act, the writ petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. No costs. _________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 31st JULY, 2009. *TSNR