1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 75 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 722 OF 2009 Baburao s/o Ramrao Chokhat, Aged 50 years, Occupation Advocate and Agriculture, R/o New Mondha, Parbhani, Taluka and District Parbhani Applicant V E R S U S Abdul Karim Shaikh Ibrahim, Aged 54 years, Occupation Business, R/o Gulshanbaug Parbhani, Through G.P.A. Abdul Wasim s/o Abdul Karim, Aged 33 years, Occupation Business, R/o Wangi Road, Parbhani, Taluka and District Parbhani Respondent Mr. A.G. Dalal, Adv. h/f Mr. S.J. Salunke, Adv. for the applicant None present for the respondent CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 7th September, 2010 ORAL ORDER 1. Heard. 2. Review application is sought to be pressed in service on absolutely extraneous reasons. The Advocate appearing for the applicant / original respondent contended that the original appellant came before this Court through his General Power of Attorney, but the Attorney did not possess power to appear and present the appeal itself. Such objection, at this belated stage, cannot be heard for reviewing the order that was passed. The impugned order under review was passed in presence of the present applicant’s Advocate, 2 but he did not raise such objection. Therefore, the review application stands dismissed. The applicant, who is the respondent in the first appeal Court, would be at liberty to raise whatever points he can to oppose the appeal. ( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. ) SRM/ReviewApln/75/10/7910