Wm %M§ 1 ‘ \ 'C/V' [gab IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ¢HHATTISGARH . (S) No. zqo% /;2011 t :- / L.R. Sawarlfar, Aged about 63 years, S/ . ' l AT BILASPUR 4 PETITIONER Yashwant ” Ram Sawa rka r, 1 Retired Assistant Grade —II,.,’Civil Court Raipur, R/o..— Sai Mandir, Raja Talab, Raipur (C.G.) 9_ A~ VERSUS District & Sessions Raipur (C.G.) Judge, O.P. Gupta, Enquiry Officer, 4T“,Additional & Sessions Judge, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT; PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT(S) OR ORDER(s) OR DIRECTIONS(S) A w. P HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH W: B§LASPUR WRET’ PETITION (S) NO. 2408 OF 2011 PETkTiONER LR. Sawarkar Versus RESPONDENTS _ District and Sessioujws Judge, Raipur ’&Another , ‘ ,, § :u Arun (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Ccnstitution of india) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri SatishrK. Agnihotri, J‘ Present:- / ShriY.C.Sharma Advocate forthe_pe:titioner. ~ ORDER (ORAL‘ (Passed on We 6t“ day 0f May, 401 1) i ’ . 1. Leerned counsel appeanng for the petitioner submits that ‘he enquirv officer in a pending enqun’y against the petitioner by order dated 19i04/2011 closed the evidence of the petitioner on the giound that ' despite granting timeto the petitioner, to adduce his evidence, the petitioner has not responded, 2. Bev that as It may, it is not propef to Interfere With the enquiry , proceedinqs at this staoe However, it is expected that the enquiry officer Mil conduct the enquiry, in accordance with law after following the basic principles of natural justice. l 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. . Sdl- SaushK Agmm‘“ i i_ udge J