WPMS 917/2001 (Old No.27487/1997) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard Sri M.S. Tyagi, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no. 1 & 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners stated that the petitioners have not made any encroachment upon the land in dispute and the courts below have fell into error in coming to the conclusion that the petitioners have unauthrorizedly encroached upon the disputed land and that no spot inspection was carried out. Therefore, orders for ejectment and penalty are erroneous and illegal. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is allowed. Impugned judgments and orders dated 30.121996 and 20.05.1997 are hereby set aside. Matter is remanded back to decide the dispute afresh after getting the land in dispute properly demarcated. The dispute shall be decided within a period of three months. (P.C.V., J.) 30.7.2008 Prabodh