IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2011 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1933 LA.App..No. 176 of 2010(D) ------------------------------- LAR.115/2007 of SUB COURT, QUILANDY .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENTS ---------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KRALA, REP.BY THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA) KOYILANDY. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD, ROADS DIVISION. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.T.T.JOSEPHINA RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANT -------------------------------- SOUDA, NANMANAKKANDY, OORALLUR, KOYILANDY. ADV. SRI.N.SUBRAMANIAN(NO VAK) SRI.M.S.NARAYANAN(NO VAK) THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/05/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & N. K. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ L. A. A. No.176 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 26th day of May, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J Smt.T.T.Josephina, the learned Government Pleader draws our attention to our own judgment in LAA. Nos.85, 103 & 179 of 2010. She submitted that under that judgment for properties for which the same rate has been awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer the court had fixed the land value at ` 27,000/- per cent and requested that we allow the Government's appeal to the extent of reducing the market value of land under acquisition to ` 27,000/-. 2. Sri.M.S.Narayanan, the learned counsel for the respondent/claimant on the contrary drew our attention to our own judgment in LAA.192/10. He submitted that LAA.192/10 is an appeal arising from LAR.87/07 which is one L. A. A. No.176 of 2010 -2- of the five cases decided under the impugned common judgment. He submitted that under that judgment we have confirmed the impugned judgment. 3. Though Smt.Josephina was very persuasive, we feel that the judgment in LAA.192/10 has more probative and decisive force than the judgment in LAA. Nos.85/10, 103/10 and 179/10 in this case. Hence, relying on that judgment we dismiss this appeal, however, without any order as to costs. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE N. K. BALAKRISHNAN JUDGE kns/-