IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25595 of 2008 NIRMALA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.7.2008 Heard. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with allegation that he along with accused Suresh Sahni committed murder of the brother of the informant. The contention is that learned Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-II, Samastipur , instead of writing a judicial order put in a desertation on the application of section 120B of the Indian Penal Code and seriousness injected by it into the facts and circumstances of a case under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The further contention is that except the astray opinion of the learned Judge about the seriousness injected on account of inception of section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, there could not be any tangible opinion of the Judge for rejecting the prayer. I have perused the impugned order and I have difficulty in dismissing the contention. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case and the contention, let petitioner, namely, Nirmala Devi be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge cum F.T.C. no.II, Samastipur, in connection with Sessions Trial no.324 of 2008 arising out of Dalsinghsarai P.S. case no.38 of 2008. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J ) sudip