€^ % 1 ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH CQURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUK : :. .,••.. WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^%1 OF2009 (SJB.) PETITIONERS '!*;RESPONDiENTS 1. Smt. MamtixBistw/o Shri Narendi-a Kuinar Bist, aged about 43 years, occiipatiQn— service, posted as Silperintendent (U.D.T.) at Mata Shabri Kanya Ashram, village & Post: Chinu-gaon, Block & TaUsil: Bakawand, District Bastar(C.G.). -'2. Radhe Shyam Patel s/o Shri Ganesh Ram Patel, aged about 44 years, Occupation : Service, Posted as L.D.T. at Mata Shabi-i Kaiiya Ashram, village & Post : Chiurgaon, Block & Tahsil Bakawand, Disto'ict Bastar (C.G.) - ^3. GhanshyaCl Bhute s/o Late Shri Chhote Lal Bhute, aged about 41 years, occupation — Service, posted as LJ3.T. at Mata Shabri Kaiiya Ashrm, village & post r Ghmrgaon, Blocfc & Talisil Bakawafld, District Bastar .^G-)'-:':::.::^'':::':''^ ^ 4. •Lachhidgr Dewangan .s^ Shri Sona Ram Dewangan, aged about 47 years, oecypatiOn: ServiGe, Posteli as L.D.T. at Mata SMabri Kanya Ashram, village & post Chiurgaolt, Block & Tahsil Bakawand, District Bastar .'(C-G-);'/;:: : •' ., •.:;- 5. Moti Lal Kashyap s/o Shri MangUj Ram Kashyap, aged about 44 years, Qccupation- Service, Posted as L.D.T., at Mata Shabri Kanya Ashram, village feAj'ost Chiurgaon, Block & Tahsil Bakawand, District Bastar (C.G.). -" : VERSUS .1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secrefary, Tnbal Welfare Departmentt Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). ^ 1. The Cpmmissioner, Trihal Welfare and Devetopment, Raipur(C.G.). -3. Collector, District Collectorate, DistriGfBastar(C.G.). Bastar, i^fwmsd'Psirtv L/ .^ 4. The Secretary, Mata^^^ Saasthan Samiti,, ©imrapal,Tahsil.& Disttict Jagdalpur(C.G,).< . | . . » fl;'t' 1'1 S 2 '^ WRITPETITIONUNDERARTIGLE2260FTHECQNSTITUTION OFINDIA,1950 ^K^ HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUR WRiT PETSTiON (S) N0. 6410 OF 2009 ^ J^ G'. PETiTIONERS RESPONDENTS W/rif Smt. Mamta Bist & Others Versus State ofChhattisgarh & Others petition underAriicSs 226 ofthe Consiitution of Indis) ijngie Bench: Hon'bie Shri Safish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: - Shri Ysshwant Tiwari, counsel for the petslioners. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Pane! Lawyer for fhe State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 7 day of November, 2009) ing forfhe parties, the ffith the consent of iearned counsel aps siition is heard finajly. Learned counss! appearing for the petitioners submits that the instanf petltion Is squareiy covered by the decjsion of this Court 3. 4. in Smt. A. Laii v. State of Chhattisgarh thus the petitioners may be permittedto make a representation to declde their case in the 'ight of afors-stated decssion, subject to vsrlfication offacts asto whetherihs respondent No-4 Institute is a Governmsnt aidedschooi and the petitioners are the teachers within thesanctioned strength. Learned counss! sppearing for the State submite that 'm the event, the petitioners make s fepresentation, the sanne wi!I be considered snd declded, in sccordance with Saw, vvithin a period of four v»'eeksfrom the date of receipt of the repressntation. In view of foregoing.according to the iearned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing suwives in this petftion for adjudicatlon. Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of. ^:..^0^ x^ M^ $?^^e ^ 2007 (1)BLJ 265