HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRL.P.No.6143 of 2010 ORDER: Petitioner seeks quashing of the order passed in Crl.R.P.No.23 of 2010 dated 25.06.2010 on the file of the I-Additional Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy, in insisting the petitioner to furnish security by executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- along with surety of the owner for Rs.1,00,000/-. The petitioner submits that he is the driver of the lorry bearing No. AP 16-TW-4277, who obtained no objection certificate from the owner of the vehicle to initiate necessary proceedings before the Court for release of the vehicle. The said vehicle was seized by the police as it was carrying iron rods which are the subject matter of the Crime No.110 of 2010 on the file of Sangareddy (Rural) Police Station, Medak District, registered for the offence punishable under Section 395 of I.P.C. The petitioner filed Crl.M.P.No.711 of 2010 before the Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sangareddy, for release of vehicle and the same was dismissed by an order dated 14.06.2010. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred Crl.R.P.No.23 of 2010 before the I-Additional Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy. On a consideration of the entire material available on record, the learned I-Additional Sessions Judge allowed the said revision with the following conditions: 1. The lower Court is directed to return the petition property to the petitioner after satisfying itself about the ownership of the vehicle and after obtaining endorsement of the owner that he does not have any objection to give the vehicle to the petitioner for interim custody. 2. The petitioner is directed to furnish security by executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- to the satisfaction of the lower Court, with the surety of the owner for Rs.1,00,000/-. 3. The petitioner is directed not to sell or to affect any changes to the vehicle and to produce the vehicle as and when he is directed by the Court. Aggrieved by Condition No.2, the petitioner preferred this petition. Heard both sides. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and as the petitioner is prepared to deposit original R.C. book of the vehicle, I deem it proper to order release of the vehicle by way of interim custody of the petitioner with the following terms: The vehicle in question shall be handed over to the interim custody of the petitioner during the pendency of the case before the trial court on condition of the petitioner depositing the original R.C book of the vehicle and executing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Cass, Sangareddy. The petitioner shall also give an undertaking not to alienate or transfer/encumber the vehicle and change the nature of the vehicle and to produce the vehicle as and when he is directed by the Court below till the disposal of the case. The Criminal Petition is accordingly disposed of. _______________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 02.07.2010 Gsn.