IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 31328 of 2008(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- T.S.ULLAS BABU, S/O.SIVASANKARAN, THULUVANPARAMBIL, CHOORAKKATUKARA, AMALANAGAR, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------- 1. VICE CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT. 2. REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT. 3. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT. 4. PRINCIPAL, GOVT.LAW COLLEGE, THRISSUR. R1 TO R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, CALICUT UTY. R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT. SUDHA DEVI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V. GIRI, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 31328 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of November, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner, who is a student studying for a 5 year LLB course in Government Law College, Thrissur, completed the course in the year 2006. He did not clear all the papers. He had appeared for the exam in Labour Law of the 9th semester and when results were published, he found that he has failed to clear the same. He has filed an application for revaluation. This writ petition has been filed praying for a direction to respondents to publish the revaluation results of the 9th semester, Labour Law. 2. A counter affidavit has been filed by the University. Reference is made to a decision taken by the syndicate on 18.09.08 which reads as follows: “4. The Syndicate of the University considered the matter in its meeting held o 18.09.08 vide item No.2008.613 and resolved as under:- 'Considered the complaint with regard to the mass failure in LLB Examinations. Resolved to conduct a random valuation and if any large scale discrepancy is detected with original marks, W.P.C.No. 31328 OF 2008 -:2:- the Controller of Examinations is authorised to conduct revaluation of all answer scripts in the relevant subjects in which mass failure occurred'.” 3. Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, learned Standing Counsel for the University submits that the Labour Law papers also were sent for revaluation and the results of the revaluation would be communicated to the petitioner, provided, he had applied for the same. The submission is recorded. The writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to communicate the petitioner the results of his revaluation, provided, his application for revaluation is in proper form, within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. (V. GIRI, JUDGE) ttb W.P.C.No. 31328 OF 2008 -:3:-