IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.18502 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: December 4, 2006 Anu Bala ….Petitioner VERSUS Punjab Technical University, Jalandhar and others …. Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA PRESENT: Shri S.K.Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral). Concededly, the petitioner had not participated in the 1st counselling. There is absolutely no reason spelt out by the petitioner as to why she had not chosen to participate in the Ist counselling. The learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to point out any rule/regulation which permits her to participate in any subsequent counselling even having remained absent in the first counselling. Dismissed. (Viney Mittal) Judge December 4, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla) KD Judge