IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 509 of 2009 Imran …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …… Respondents …….. Mr. B.D.Pande, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for the State. Ms. Anjali Noliyal, Advocate for respondent no.4. Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C. J. Counter affidavit has been filed. The petitioner and respondent no. 4 are present in person. A perusal of the petition, the First Information Report, documents annexed with the petition and the counter affidavit clearly reveals that respondent no. 4 made a wrong statement in the First Information Report, which she lateron retracted. Today, respondent no. 4 has stated before me personally also that she does not want to prosecute the F.I.R. The petition is allowed. The First Information Report in question is quashed with all the consequences. (V. K. Gupta, C.J.) 30.06.2009 A