IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14136 of 2005 RAM BRIJ NATH, son of late Major Mistry, resident of 306, Abhay Kutir Apartment, Mandal Compound, Boring Road, P S – Budha Colony, District –Patna. _____ Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Additional Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Joint Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5. The Special Officer cum Deputy Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 6. The Accountant General, Bihar, Birchand Patel Path, Patna. _______ Respondents ----------- 03. 25.10.2010 Heard counsel for the parties. Obviously there a long communication gap for whatever reasons. The new counsel informs the Court that the petitioner does not have any input on the so-called decision to withhold 25 per cent pension. The decision was taken way back on 17.11.2006. Today the concerned notification or order has been produced before the court. Obviously when the writ was filed some developments have taken place and effect thereafter. No purpose will be served now in entertaining the writ application in the present form and content. The writ application is dismissed. Let the petitioner file a fresh writ application challenging the order of punishment or such other decision of withholding other benefits which he rightfully claims. 2 Dismissal of the writ application may not come in the way of the filing of fresh writ application. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)