IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 11224 of 2008. Decided on: 21.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Er. C.K. Chaturvedi and others. … Petitioners. Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners : Mr. Lokender Paul Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents : Ms. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, Advocate for respondent No.4. Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.5 and 6. None for respondents No.3 and 7 to 10. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Petitioner has earlier approached the erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal by way of O.A. No.578 of 2004. Same was directed to be treated as representation on 19th March, 2004. The representation has been decided by the Secretary of respondent-Board 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - on 11th May, 2004 (Annexure A-1) without a speaking/detailed order. Consequently, Annexure A-1, dated 11th May, 2004 is quashed and set aside. The Secretary of the respondent-Board is directed to decide the representation, as ordered by the learned Tribunal on 19th March, 2004, by passing a speaking and detailed order after taking into consideration all the grounds/pleas raised in the representation, within a period of three months after the production of certified copy of this judgment, by the petitioners. The parties shall also be heard in person and for that purpose separate date shall be notified. It shall be open to the parties to raise all the please, legal as well as factual, before the Secretary of the Board. 2. Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 21, 2010. (sck).