[G] FCH: iN'BL] A^3_ 'u / >I7T1 Chandrika Prasad Chandrakar S/o Shri Panna Lal Chandrakar aged about 48 yeare, Assistant Teacher, Presently posted at Go-v-t. Primary School Paragaon, Block - Arang Dist rarfC.G.) 1. State of Chhattisgarl Through the Secretary, of Sc.hoo] Ra-ipur (C.G.: 2. The District Education Officer Raipur. District Raipur(C.G.) 3. The Block Education Officer Arang, rc.G.1 Present: Shri C.R.Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner, Lawyer for the £ ci-t^/^-y^ .f4 ^^yi^? i C5UUiiU^Ii15 .1 3. (Passed on 2na ofApril,2007) Learned counsel appearins for tfae petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact asd question of law mvolved in the present writ petition are the Y! 1 2. 3. (II) 1, which has been disposed of vide order 03.04.2006. Leamec ients does not cQntrovert the said submission. ^^UU,.3tij fi- In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Ku.ma.r ¥erma vs. 'The State Gavt. of Chhattisgarh another) and other connected matters, lecided by th.is Court on 15-12-2006, pursuast to the memo 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary', Board of lecondary Education, Bhopal the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination, it was clarified that the nomenclature ofthe Basic Training Institute, i.e... B.T.I. has been changed and renanied as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordiugly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petitioa (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesb Verrmi vs. The State Govt.. of Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the in the case ofYashwant Kumar Bharadws lal Corporation; Dm'g another (Supra), subjec.t to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired D.Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses a.s per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advanc-e increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotn Judge Amit