IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14534 of 2009 1. AMITABH BACHCHAN SHRIVASTAVA S/O LATE SHATRUGHAN PRASAD VILL.- GHATAHO, P.S. GHATAHO, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY (HOME AFFAIRS) C.I.S.F. HEAD OFFICE, NEW DELHI 2. THE I.G. null C.I.S.F. (MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS), SOUTH WEST REGION, R.C.F.L. COMPLEX CHEMBUR, MUMBAI 3. THE DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL C.I.S.F. (MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS) R.C.F.L. COMPLEX CHEMBUR MUMBAI- 74 4. THE COMMANDANT C.I.S.F.K.P.T. UNIT KANDLA KACHCHH, GUJRAT 5. THE ASSISTANT COMMANDANT K.P.T. UNIT KANDLA, KACHCHH, GUJRAT 6. THE SENIOR COMMANDANT C.I.S.F. UNIT BIHAR, PATNA 7. THE DEPUTY COMMANDANT C.I.S.F. UNIT, BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 2/ 05-11-2009 Heard. Petitioner is aggrieved by the punishment order dated 18.09.2004, Annexure-4, whereunder after conclusion of the departmental proceeding he has been imposed punishment of censure. Petitioner is further aggrieved by the appellate order dated 04.11.2004, Annexure-5, whereunder the appeal filed against the punishment order dated 18.09.2004, Annexure-4, has been dismissed. It is evident from perusal of the aforesaid two orders that the orders were passed on 18.09.2004 and 04.11.2004 and this writ petition, assailing the aforesaid orders, has been filed on 03.11.2009, i.e., after five years - 2 - of the passing of the impugned orders. On account of delay in filing the writ petition I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed on the ground of laches. ( V.N.Sinha, J ) BTiwary/