IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45742 of 2008 1. CHANDRABALI SINGH 2. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH 3. CHUNNI DEVI @ ARCHANA KUMARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a police case under sections 302 and 201 of the Penal Code. The submission is that the FIR is against unknown, there being no eye-witness to the murder when the body was found abandoned. The father of the deceased then filed a protest petition that he suspected the petitioners which gave an opportunity to the police to implicate the petitioners. The impugned order of rejection refers to several paragraphs of the case dairy to record “preponderance of the incriminating evidence against the petitioners under sections 302 and 201” and then rejects the prayer. It contains no discussion or even a prima facie suggestion of nature of material against the petitioners to reject their prayer for anticipatory bail. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 Chandrabali Singh and Ashok Kumar Singh surrender in the court below within four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory - 2 - bail during the period of investigation till the submission of the charge-sheet on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Samastipur in Khanpur p.s.case no.49 of 2008. Considering that petitioner no.3 Chunni Devi @ Archana Kumari is lady, let her surrender within like period when she shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of abovementioned court in Khanpur p.s.case no.49 of 2008. hr ( Navin Sinha )