IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A.No.1910 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 18.5.2010 Neelam Rani ....Appellant Versus Sohan Lal and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Balbir Singh Sewak, Advocate for the appellant. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. C.M.No.5891-C of 2010 Allowed as prayed for. C.M.No.5892-C of 2010 in/and R.S.A.No.1910 of 2010 There is absolutely no infirmity in the findings recorded by the Courts below. The evidence of the appellant was closed in the year 2005 after giving her several opportunities to conclude her evidence. This order was never challenged by the appellant. It has been noticed in the impugned order that the case remained pending from 27.10.2004 till 14.9.2005 before the evidence of the appellant was closed for not having utilised such opportunities. This order having not been challenged the Court had left with no other option but to accept the evidence on record led by the respondents to decree R.S.A.No.1910 of 2010 (O&M) -2- his suit. Now after 5 years plea of the appellant that she was precluded from adducing her evidence because of the fault of the counsel cannot be accepted. No ground to interfere. Dismissed. Consequently the stay application is also dismissed. 18.5.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss