IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.3125 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 18, 2011 Darshan Kumar Garg ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Vivek Suri, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has not made any averment in the writ petition to indicate that he is in the zone of consideration as a degree-holder. This fact is not there in the pleadings despite the fact that the petitioner has now filed an amended writ petition and notice is yet to be issued. It would be appropriate for the petitioner to withdraw this writ petition and file a fresh one, making all proper averments, so that the lis can be properly adjudicated. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one for the same cause of action. August 18, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE