IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA THURSDAY, THE 13TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 22ND KARTHIKA 1930 Bail Appl..No. 6836 of 2008() ----------------------------- (CRIME NO. 545/2008 OF KANNUR TOWN POLICE STATION) PETITIONER ------------------------------ M.K.DINOOP ,AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.VAMANAN, NAVANEETH,KOTTALI P.O.,KANNUR-16. BY ADV. SRI.VIJU THOMAS SMT.M.MEENA JOHN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZ. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. HEMA, J. --------------------------------------------------- Bail Appl.No. 6836 of 2008 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of November, 2008. ORDER Petition for anticipatory bail. 2. The alleged offences are under Sections 143, 147, 148, 447, 427 and 506(ii) read with section 149 IPC. According to the prosecution, petitioner trespassed into the house of de facto complainant and committed mischief in the house etc. The motive is that the son of the de facto complainant used to harass 1st petitioner's sister while she was going to school. It is also alleged that the de facto complainant was criminally intimidated by showing a sword, bomb etc. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that accused nos. 2, 3 and 4 were granted anticipatory bail and the contentions raised were considered in detail in the order dated 12.8.208 in B.A.No.4877 of 2008 of this Court and the petitioner also stands in the same footing as that of other accused and hence he may also be granted anticipatory bail, it is submitted. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that anticipatory bail was granted to co-accused after detailed discussion of the contentions and he has no objection in granting anticipatory bail to petitioner who is similarly placed. [B.A.No.6836/08] 2 5. On hearing both sides, I find that the same benefit can be extended to petitioner also. Hence, the following order is passed: 1. Petitioner shall surrender before the Investigating Officer and make himself available for interrogation and co-operate with with the investigation. 2. Thereafter, in he event of his arrest, if any, he shall be produced before the Magistrate court concerned on the same day, in accordance with law. 3. On production of the petitioner before the learned Magistrate, and if any bail application is filed, the petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing bond for Rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate on condition that petitioner shall co- operate with the investigation and report before the investigating officer as and when directed and that he shall not commit any offence while on bail. Petition is allowed. K. HEMA, JUDGE. Krs.