IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38729 of 2008 FIROJ MIAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.9.2008 Heard. The charge against the petitioner was framed as per the rejection order on 11.4.2008 and in about a period of four months the learned Judge has not been able to examine the witnesses. The petitioner is in custody since 26.11.2006. The facts of the case and the reasons for dismissal of the earlier prayer for bail have been assigned in the earlier order. I could not touch upon the merits of the matter and suppose to scrutinize the fresh circumstance of not brining the trial to a conclusion. I could direct the learned court below to look the provisions of law specially the case of Shailendra Kumar Vrs. State of Bihar AIR 2002 SC 2002 and act accordingly by issuing a notice to the officer-in-charge of the police station by which the case was investigated into and direct him to produce the witnesses before him by remaining present on all dates of hearing. I believe that acting as per the Supreme Court direction, could be beneficial to the learned Judge in disposal of the matter. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )