IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42588 of 2011 Dhanjee Pandey @ Dhananjay Pandey son of Ramnarayan Pandey Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 23.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 19.04.2011 in a case registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and name of this petitioner came in this case on the basis of one diary which is said to have been recovered on 29.04.2006 at 07:00 P.M. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that according to seizure list, the so-called diary was recovered on 29.04.2006 at 07:00 P.M. whereas fardbayan was lodged on 29.04.2006 at 11:00 P.M. but in the written report of informant there is no whispering of the seizure of the aforesaid diary. It is further contended by him that the First Information Report was put up before the Chief Judicial Magistrate on 02.05.2006 whereas the seizure list was put up before the Chief Judicial Magistrate on 10.06.2006 so the aforesaid circumstances create doubt 2 abut the genuineness of the seizure list. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of this case as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10, 000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the F.T.C. V, Kamiur at Bhabua, in connection with Kudara P.S. Case No. 52 of 2006. Saif/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)