IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 1848 of 2005 Between: Sri I. Janaki Ram, S/o. I. Keshavarao, R/o. Flat No. B-42, Steel and Mans Complex, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad - 77. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad. 2. The Assistant Director, Survey and Land Records, O/o. District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the impugned action of the 2nd respondent in not conducting survey and not fixing the boundaries in respect of the land to an extent of Ac.4.33 gts., in Sy.No. 147 situated at Kattedan Village of Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as arbitrary, illegal, and contrary to the provisions of A.P. Survey and Boundaries Act, and consequently direct the 2nd respondent herein to consider the representation filed by the petitioner for conducting of the Survey and fixation of the boundaries in respect of the land to an extent of Ac. 4.33 guntas in Sy. No. 147 situated at Kattedan Village of Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.J.ASHVINI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: Aggrieved by the alleged inaction on part of the second respondent in conducting the survey and fixing the boundaries in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.4.20 guntas situate in Sy. No. 147 at Kattedan village of Rajendranagar Mandal, Rangareddy District as requested by the petitioner, this writ petition is filed. The petitioner states that he made an application on 27.07.2004 requesting the respondents herein for conducting survey and fixing the boundaries and he has also paid the requisite fees. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 27.07.2004 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. No costs. _____________ (G. ROHINI, J) Date: 08.02.2005. Ksn ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad. 2. The Assistant Director, Survey and Land Records, O/o. District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 3. Two C. Cs to G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 4. Two C.D. copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SPJS}