IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 17TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 26TH KARTHIKA 1933 OP(C).No. 3732 of 2011(O) ------------------------------------ [IA.NO.914/2011 IN I.A. NO.495/2011 IN OS.45/2011 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, PAYYANNUR] .................... PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. K.THAMBAN NAMBIAR, S/O CHANDU NAMBIAR, AGED 62 YEARS, BUSINESS, PILATHARA, CHERUTHAZHAM AMSOM DESOM, TALIPARAMBA TALUK. 2. T.J.SALI, S/O T.V. JOSEPH, AGED 48 YEARS, BUSINESS, PERUMBA, PAYYANNUR AMSOM, DESOM, TALIMPARAMBA TALUK. 3. T.P MUSTHAFA, S/O MUHAMMED KUNHI AGED 48 YEARS, BUSINESS, KUNHIMANGALAM AMSOM DESOM, KANNUR TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL, SRI.P.S.BINU. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. RAJEEV MEMORIAL HEALTH AND EDUCATIONAL, SOCIETY, REG. NO. 599/91,PILATHARA CHERUTHAZHAM AMSOM DESOM , KANNUR TALUK- 670 002. REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY. 2. GENERAL SECRETARY, REJEEV MEMORIAL HEALTH AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, K.SREEDHARAN MASTER,S/O POTHERA KARIYATTA NARAYANAN NAMBIAR, AGED 56 YEARS, RETIRED TEACHER, NEAR CHAKRAPANI TEMPLE, TRIKARIPUR, SOUTH TRIKARIPUR VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, PIN-671 310. O.P.(C).NO.3732/2011-O: 3. PRESIDENT, K.P.KUNHIKANNAN, S/O GOVINDA PODUVAL, 58 YEARS, EX.M.L.A,'PRIYADARSHINI', ANNUR VELLUR AMSOM DESOM, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, PIN-670 141. BY THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/11/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: O.P.(C).NO.3732/2011-O: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1: THE TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN OS.45/11. EXT.P2: THE TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER STATEMENT IN IA. 495/2011. EXT.P3: THE TRUE COPY OF THE INJUNCTION ORDER IN IA. 495/11 EXT.P4: THE TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION IN IA. 914/11 EXT.P5: THE TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER IN EXT. P4 EXT.P6: THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN IA 914/2011 DTD. 06/7/11. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Prv. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- O.P.(C) No.3732 of 2011 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of November, 2011. JUDGMENT Plaintiffs in O.S.No.45 of 2011 of the court of learned Munsiff, Payyannur challenge Ext.P6, order vacating the order of injunction granted as per Ext.P3 on the application filed by the respondents. 2. It is seen that respondents preferred the application and the learned Munsiff vacated the order of injunction under Order XXXIX, Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, “the Code”). Such an order is appealable under Order XLIII, Rule 1(r) of the Code. 3. Learned counsel has a contention that the learned Munsiff was not correct in passing the order under Order XXXIX, Rule 4 of the Code. That is a contention which petitioners can raise in the appeal if any preferred. Resultantly this Original Petition is disposed of without prejudice to the right if any of petitioners to challenge the impugned order by way of appeal as provided under law. THOMAS P.JOSEPH, Judge. cks