W’ $§MQE§E y @Le’% IN THE HON’BLE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (2 WE. s. N0. $513 OF 2009 PETITIONER Khageshwar Ram Chauhan S/o Bhaju Ram, aged about-55 years, Constable. Radio (Telecom), 123. office Radio (Telécom) Police, Bilaspur Zone, Bilaspur R/o Police Colony, Tifra , Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) § We VERSUS RESPONDENTS / ll State of Chhattisgarh through Secretaiy, Police Department (Radio, Telecom), D.K. S. Bhavan, Raipur (C. G. ). y 2. Director General of Police (Radio, Telecom), Police Head Quarters, Raipur (C.G.) #1 3. Superintendent of Police (Radio, Telecom), Bilaspur Zone, Distt; Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE %0NSTITUTION OF INDIA & ' FEwiamgg §§$PQNBEN?S $51“??? MW ?ET§?§DN {:3} NQ.$"25 $3? EQQ§ i<§7agashwar Fa‘m Shaman Ves'ws $2a‘ie m“ ghhaiiisgarh & {Waters f; peiiémr; under Ariicie 22$ ef the Canwmmn e? §ncié Sim~ie 3 Bench : Hon we $h¥§ Sai§sh K‘ Agnihaiti, v a J Pa'eseni :— Sim MK. Sérfna, ccansei fer iihe gaeé soaef. 3m; NN. Ray: Panei Lawyer far the State. Eu lk»: STE {?assed on sass 4‘“ day or” Nevembey, wag) Wiéa‘a the censené a? ¥eamed swnse§ apgeamg far the gawfées, éhe pew-s; §s heazrd'maiiy. ' The peié‘iienea by ms peiiiém, seeks a dheci’isn ma? thg mowdem md amcuai a’rawn by the goeégi‘iene? may mt be racmiéred after re~§nstaiing ihe petiiécna Gr; service ané consequentiy the ower tz'aied ‘3 5-9-2089 (Armexure — Pf?) may be quashed 0n perusai of ihe papeis‘ ét is fcumi tha‘: agamsi ”2m ads: {iai‘ed ”.§-9-2G09 the geiitioner has aéready mad$ a rwfesemaiion befwe "i‘he respondent-author§iies on 22~8a2§a9 i§nnexme — 95; The petitioner has rushes: ix: this Smart withmaé wai‘iMg f0!“ the {iedsion on the regresentaiimm H A seven Judges Bench of me Supfeme Ccurt £21 $5. Rathore vs. SEQ Q§ Madhya ?ra§€a5i1"!, ob‘égg’vgd thaz in every wah gas$ Qmy when the gapeal or represeraiaéion previded ’by iairv §s d}s;;osed of, cause of actiOh shaii firsi accrue aad where such crder is (20% made‘ on the exp§ry of six manths fmm the date when me agpea§ was fiEed or representatéen was macief ‘he right 1e see sha%§ met accrue. ‘i‘he petitioner oughé in h ve waited mi decisien af his {egresenmiem er s§x monihs, w§1etexxer is eafiier. Thus, ihe preeergi ee‘tiiion cannat be eniertained at th§s siege. Accordingiy, ihe Wm pet§iiee is e§sméssed at tee meme ezege kseéf p1 as wemaiure. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge ‘- i a