IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2008 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1930 RP.No. 442 of 2008 -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.2361/2008 Dated 04/03/2008 REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4 IN W.P(C) ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES'PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, P.B.NO.1895, KALOOR KOCHI-682 017. 2. THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISIONER EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, P.B.NO. 1895, KALOOR,KOCHI-682 017. 3. THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, P.B.NO.1895, KALOOR, KOCHI-682 017. 4. THE CENTRAL PROVEDENT FUND COMMISSIONER BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, 14, BHIKAJI CAMA ROAD, NEW DELHI-110 066. BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.) SMT.T.N.GIRIJA, SC,EPF ORGANISATION RESPONDENT: PETITIONER IN THE W.P(C) ------------------------------------- M/S VYSALI PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., ADMIBNISTRATIVE OFFICE, 32/1289 A, CIVIL LINES ROAD, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI-682 025 -REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR DR. A.D.KRISHNAN. BY ADV SRI. V. RAMACHANDRAN. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= R.PNo. 442 of 2008 in W. P (C) No. 2361 of 200 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 11th April, 2008. O R D E R The Provident Fund Organisation challenges my judgment dated 4-3-2008 in the review petition. In the writ petition, I only directed the Central Provident Fund Commissioner to dispose of Exts. P8, P18 and P19 representations expeditiously, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. This order is sought to be reviewed at the instance of the Provident Fund Organisation. I am of the opinion that when an assessee under the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act submits a representation, in an appropriate case, the Central Provident Fund Commissioner has to consider the same in accordance with law. I have not even granted stay of recovery pending disposal of the representation. That being so, I do not find any merit in the review petition and accordingly, the same is dismissed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.