IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2009 / 11TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 6971 of 2009(N) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- RAJAN, S/O.KRISHNAN NAIR, MELEDATH HOUSE, CHEEKILODE P.O., NANMINDA, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.K.G.ANIL BABU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VATAKARA. BY GP SRI. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).6971/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 1st day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P6 proceedings of the respondent by which a request made by him for revising his timings originally settled under Ext.P3 has been dealt with. The order is revisable before the Tribunal. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that no timing conference was held as mentioned in Ext.P6. But as a matter of fact, though the timing conference was purportedly convened on 27.5.2008, the order is seen to be dated 22.11.2007. 2. Learned Government Pleader submits that this is obviously a mistake. Be that as it may. I am of the view that the petitioner must be permitted to prosecute the statutory remedy in relation to Ext.P6. Accordingly, it is directed that if the petitioner files a revision against Ext.P6 within three weeks from today, impleading those persons W.P.(C).6971/2009 2 who had objected to the revision of the timings as well, then the revision may be treated as within time and disposed of by the Tribunal as expeditiously as possible. Writ petition is disposed of as above. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs