- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.234 OF 2006 Entertainment Network India Ltd. ...Petitioner vs. The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. ...Respondents --- and ARBITRATION PETITION NO.235 OF 2006 Entertainment Network India Ltd. ...Petitioner vs. The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. ...Respondents and ARBITRATION PETITION NO.236 OF 2006 Entertainment Network India Ltd. ...Petitioner vs. The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. ...Respondents and ARBITRATION PETITION NO.237 OF 2006 Entertainment Network India Ltd. ...Petitioner vs. - 2 - The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. ...Respondents and ARBITRATION PETITION NO.238 OF 2006 Entertainment Network India Ltd. ...Petitioner vs. The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. ...Respondents and ARBITRATION PETITION NO.239 OF 2006 Entertainment Network India Ltd. ...Petitioner vs. The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. ...Respondents Mr.Janak Dwarkadas, Sr.Counsel with Pradip Sancheti i/b. Mulla & Mulla, for Petitioenr. Mr.T.Subramaniam with S.S.Purohit i/b. Media Lexicon, for Respondent CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 6th NOVEMBER,2006 P.C.: . The learned Counsel appearing for petitioner states that without prejudice to petitioner’s rights - 3 - and contention the petitioner will continue to pay to the respondent royalty at the same rate at which it is being presently paid and according to him, which is being accepted by the respondent. The statement is accepted. . In view of this statement, on a motion made by the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner, the petitions are allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to approach again if in law he is entitled to do so. All the contentions available to both the sides are kept open to be raised before the Arbitrator. It is clarified that the respondent shall also be at liberty to take appropriate action that may be permissible to him under the law. ---