1 1 1 4 4 4r 419 I 14 1 1 J 1 4 616 1 dleSo e e V 2 1 2 15 W b 4l 4 116 7 e 1 CWP No416of2010 11 1 V t s 40 t1 4a l 4171 1 2tn Yp 1 4 In ofPunjab andHaryana at 10 3 4 44t Wb I l l 4 tl t 1 n1 1 1 1 n 4Y 1 U r4 r T f 1 t t J 1 Dateofdecisnl J 1 71 1 11 CWPNoA165of2010 5 Il t A 15 0 DrRaviSherSini Toor andanother t eePetitioners 9W 1041 t 41 1 I TheBibiiFaridUniversity ofHealth Sciences 1 1 Faridkotano 1 eee I6 mee 1 1 21 CWPN03643 of2010 1 1 1 1 DrSunil andothers Petitioners 11 p l llersus 1 TheBabaFarid ofHealth Sciences 81 Faridkotandothers See S eN47 t er9lM 1 1 11 ll 31 CWP NoA189 of2010 e 145 1 6 Il DrKranti Gargandanother 1 Petitioners 1 t 1 Veo 4 e Ir 9 n 4 1 Versus r 1 1 k h 1 e p e ee StateofPunjab and andothers CORAM4ONBLE MR JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI 4 4 Present Mr TS DhindsaandMrAshok ShannaNabhawala Advocatesfor the MrKS Dadwal AddlAG Punjabwith Punjab GuptaAdvocate forthe Mranninder with for theMCI 46 PERMOD KOHLI Je 4 Suresh Kumar 2014.04.26 12: 49 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 4 13 1 Ield 4 1114 1 eev0 err9r 4 1t111 1 711 4 1e9r421a 4e 420 4 t Al 1 f n 43 1 n l 1 14 W 1 1 1 t4 1 1 VW 1 31 11 t 29 11 j e1 rl M e 11 6 1 l 1 4 Wi sed 1 21 e9P Pr 1 tr uponthe common er 15 Writ petitions are 6lg 5 1M7 1 9e 74 disposofbythiscommon order nt 11 Ie 4ml The petitioners el 4 111all thesewrit petitions Post Graduate are Il vee 4s 4 0 1 1 b 1 Stude pursumgtheir Post GraduateCourses different 111 Theyapplied for admission 70 to PostGraduateCoursesln various in responseto the Il 1 issuedby the l m PGETe2007 Atler the EntranceExaminationthe petitioners were rrelo appear the which was to be conductedby the 0 I The flrst wasto be held in themonth 1 0 ofMay2007for which dateswere e notified However a nilmberofwrit I et petitions came to be filed beforethisCourt in of the from timeto time 44 writ petitionsthe filed the SpecialLeave Petition beforethe Court One of such SpecialLeave PetitionNo10374 of 2007 C4 BFUHS Vs Munish Sethiandotherslwas decidedbythe Honble Apex Court on 11062007 W2 a fresh was fixed on Z 5 1202007 and 13072007 The second was Oxed on tl 07082007 Beforesecond could be held again some writ 1 petitions were filed resulting in postponment of the same On disposal of the Writ Leave Petitiods third was held 1 4 between v 1 It is theadmittedpositionamongstthepartiesthatall the Writ 4 4 Petitionerswere admittedto their respective betweenOctober courses to 1 December20070 Under the Ordinanceslaid down by the the 1 rn6nths the periodof exation ThreeAnnual Examinations are to be held The 1 Suresh Kumar 2014.04.26 12: 49 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 17 1 L1 119 11 M e d 421 1 1 4 n4 r r 4 r 4 L 4 0 4 t 1 4 145t41 J v CP4185f2010 39 1 41 9vwe 41 1 W n remt Rulations issuedbythe Councilof India which are V Io 1 4 1 4 1 Medical Education knownas S1 4 4 1 1 4 t 10 PERlOD OF TRAINING 1 t t t of trainingfor the award of various The e D degrees or shall be as 1 followsl r 0 11Doctor ofMedicine Master of Surgery 0 r I 6MSel C9 a Theperiodoftraining for obtaining thesedegrees I shall bethree yearsincluding theperiod r ofexaminationl n Ji thatin tlie case of studentshaving 5 4 1 r in the same tMe periodof training 9L mv3 the perlodof examinationshall be two 1 b 5 yearSe Om 157 11 13 Period 4 131 XX XX C4 132 All candidatesjoiniitgthe training programme sha11work as h111time 1 Residents theperiodof training notle8sthan80IoEighty of the training each calendaryear and givenfull time and in all Suresh Kumar 2014.04.26 12: 49 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Il ir 1 1I 422 1 1j 1 4 Il i 1e49t 1664 84 d WoA1656f2010 41 Ol 1 111 0w rI l i t facetsofthe educational process 11 1 14 EXAMINATIONS t A 1 1 The examinatlonsshallbe on the basis of grading or marking to evaluateand i 1 i candidateslevel ofnowledgeskill and r at the end of the trainingand P 1m obtaining of 50Io marksin thcoryas r a C 1 411 I 4 6 wellas shallbe for 0 0 the whole exination The examination I Il C5 for MS MD DM M Ch shall beheld at the 1 IhP endof 3 academicyears six termsland 17 Z for at the endof 2 academicyears our 0 academic The academicterm shall mean I a5 1 9 14 39Numberof Examinations The shall conductnot morethan two W3 examinns m a year for any subjectwith an C intervalof not less than 4 and not mort than 6 1 months betweenthetwo examinations 1 Onthebasisof the and the framedby 4 S C the a Committeeconstitutedbythe Vicelancellor decidedto fix the for Post GraduateExaminationin respectto the students inthe year 2007 The decisionofthe Committeeis as follows 0 AAer goingthrough the record it was observed that the of PG in the year 2007started inFebruaryandextendedto December2007 The e 0 1 4 vev n4 r e Suresh Kumar 2014.04.26 12: 49 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 14 1 r 2 123 1 1 1 1 1 e 1 4r tr 02 5 45 e0 4 W S n 4 1 65 1 4 1 t 1 4 4 1 e4 1 n 1 r wasdeliberatediti detail Keepingin Vlew mauer Il 1 theextendedadmission schedule and to give Ie 91 7 II b conductthe studentsof 2007 e t 4 In batchas undtrl t N 41n 1 4 401 Ie 31 Sl 0 May studentsadmittedupto July2007 ii9October studentsadmittedupto nrvr 31 December2007 C This decision was communicatedby the Baba Farid J to the of a1lthe MedicallDentalColleges afftliated Pl5 to thesaid Universityvide its dated252010 The 0 extractofthe communicationis hereunderl I AI MBBS Final Prof ParteIO C4 r Not o preeponethe examinattons a7 and the should adhereto the schedule in vogue B9PG MDIMSIDipl Examinations6Batch 20071 To conduct the examinations of PG studentsof 4eeem Batche2007 as underl a studentsadmittedup to 3172007 0 1 b1October studentsadmittedup re to31122007 t f J 1 rn 1 Suresh Kumar 2014.04.26 12: 49 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document I lr 9 4 e 1 o 424 4e 1 1 P 1 11 nl me e L 1 1 tl 1 4 W t 2 4 1 e Il I4 1 9 8r 8tl 61 fcwPNoA1656f2010 t 1VmIlnn n IF7tP 4n to sendthe 4vjfl f Ill i Inthis regardyou we 4 e8 4 t 7 44 tl Y forms of the eligiblePG students J 1 admittedup to for 2010and 1 up to 31122007 for October 2010 examlnations 6 1 0 schedulegiven as per 1 4t1 1 5 1111 1 belowl b 1 1 of With late fee of 1 WithoutIatefee With late feeWith late fee ofRs001 Rs5001 R5001 e April15 MaylJuneMarchl March15 March31 0 911r Octe31 2 Sept15 Sep30 O6te15 Il 0 NovJDece 7r 1 ForOctober2010Examinations 1 10 d 4 The schedule shallbe intimated later 1 r l AIi 4 j0 1 4 1 1 a ez one 36 Se 4 SdlmControllerofExamtnattons J 2512110 1 The are aggrvedofthe decisionof theUniversity 08 Asa matter of fact the theholding of in phases 1 4 finalPost GraduateExaminatlon 7 Z 2010 Theysubmittedtheir formsfor to be held lll 0 L 0beenallottedthe roll numbersnor a 4 but have the examinationscheduledto commence from toappearin the 14052010 94 It is contendedon behalfof the that theyhave courses of studies ld have more than 90 per cent the final examlnatlon tn They are eligibleto appear 111 t has also been MaylJune2010 The actionofthe themthe rightto appear 111theSnal assailed as arbitrary ln 1 May 2010 It is argud on behalfof the examination in 4 1 t e 1491 e 1 Suresh Kumar 2014.04.26 12: 49 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document t r A 25 1 nl S 9 1 6 j T e4t4 t Vl l 11 0 1 1 11 3 h 0 7CWPN04165 7 1 1 46 4 n t e 8r 1 Il r 1 1 dt 1 t s r 71 1 n in past Post 4 Graduatesluden were to appearin 7 1 4tP1W T 41 e the AnnualExaminationconductedin the monthof MayIJunesubject to t of threeyears period study 0 their appearancein the V 1 examinationThe havealso relied upon ihterimorderpassedby 4 this Courtr111 CWP No248 of 2009 DivyaGoel Vs Baba Farid pr Universityof Health SciencesFaridkot and which is 1 below r t JS Khar J Orall 0 Written tement filed on behalf of 3 1 C5 Nol in Courttodayis takenon record 1 1 W Leamedtounsel foi No2 to 4 states vnv1 1 14 that the would three years of 7 trainingperiodon 08102005 The petitioner who Il I 1S already to the MD a5 courseundertakesto continueto attendthe course 41 till she 4hreeyearsof the w trainingcourse the result of the bedeclared Ordered 1 The resultof the handedover to us in a 1 sealedcover is returnedback to leamedcounsel for No l in the same manner 96 Writ petition standsdisposed Sdl JS Khehar Judge 32005 Sdl SlllAggarwalJudge 13 0 As a matter of fact the are seeking similarrelief as granted in theaforesaidorder 4 J 9 1 1 9e 0 Suresh Kumar 2014.04.26 12: 49 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 1 1t i 1e Il 426 1 46 Tl rn 5 Irl 1 n V 4 1 4 4n l t y CWP NoA165of2010 681 l j 11 1 4r 1 1 5 Il 13 1 t TheGlaim beenseriously opposed bythe 1 P 41 en 1 9 I e 1 i Commonreplyhas been filed While givingthe Ill 1 detailsof delayed on account of variousinterimorderspassed in various Writ Petitions it has beencontendedthatthe decisionto hold O for thestudentsadmittedto Post GraduateCoursesin theyear 1e 2007was takenbytheCommittee constitutedbytheViceChancellorandit 1 m W decided to hold examinationsof thesestudentswho were admitted r in 310702007in May 2010 andthose admiueduptoDecember2007 0 18 re 0 October2010 I 0 Gupta leamed counsel for the 1 has referred to the framedb the 4 MCIIDCIas alsothe Ordinancesof the UniversityThese r halebeprol6ed hereinaboveThese lve beenframedin exerciseof statutorypowers bythe and other bodies to regulate 1 a5 the studyof course examinationsetc 10 requires periodof trainingas three years includingthe periodof V9 examinationin caseofPost Gr21uateDee andin case of Post Graduate e 7 4 0a Diplomatwo years ptescrib minunum 80 per cent 1 1 aUendanceina calendaryear andeother ofthe 1 I e prograes 14 which dealswith theexaminationsprovide for Il 4 i6 the skill 0 of the training Suchcandidates must secure minimum of 500Iomarks r theTheoryandPracticalI and it is quali61 1 4 4 the whole It is furtherpscrlb6dthat the examinationfor 4 9 J Post Graduate shallbe held at the md of three academic 4 years six academictermsland for Diplomatwo academicyears our Il i ti S 41190e r eep e Suresh Kumar 2014.04.26 12: 49 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document S 1 427 9e 71 1 Ulnl 4e41444 411 1 4 471rv 1 r 11 T 9 aee 1I7e 41 e 71 4 rau 11 416 1 1 11 Il 11e lt 91 1 Il Ii l 411 11 1471014411 117 n71Wve 4 n c term Academictenn has herbeendescribedas six months i8t1 Ie n1Iileo r Il 4 e r 1 31of 14 restrictsthe number of 11 tramlng Clause 1 4141 0 W to two in a yearandfor any an intervoloflot les 4r7e 1 4 1 8 1 1 1 e llb t e Il 1 4 e 4 Itis on behalfoftheUnlrsitythatsanctity has to 4 7 1 be atthed the statwory framedby the Expert 14 9 1 Ii 1 Bodieslike theMCIIDCI and the Ordinances framedby the University 0 whenthecourse of study are andrelateto acquiring 0 41 1 0 higher in the fleldof Medicinesdirectlyinvolved with the 4 e C health care ofhumanbeingsIt is 1 0 4 P1 V 411P r94V4919 I1 be iluted in view of the thesestatutory issuedbytheHonble Court in the case ofMridul Dhar 1 Minorl andanotherVs Uni6n ofIndia and others200512 Supreme Coun Ct I Cases 65 C45 bOme of e relied upon by the I may notice 1 1 V In the case of IvledicalCouncilofIndils Madhu Singhand Z others20029 5 the practiceof midession missions even by the High 0 7 Courts It was in that that theHonble Court issuedthe 1 41 Il 4 i following direotionsl r Il c 23 There providingthetime schedulefor the course and 1 1 14 I W 0 1 1 theperioduringwhich admissionscan take 1 makingh ear that no admissioncan be 4 a11erthe scheduleddatewhich be the date for commencement of the 17 1 0 1 1e Il Suresh Kumar 2014.04.26 12: 49 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Wlmmlml lellelm1011m 1m m9009wmrww eb 428 6 01 4l1 1 1 1 e f 4 1 e 4 Ib 4I O le v 1 99 lr 4f d 101 4 4 r5 4111 4 wre 9V 6 1L Z 17 coursee e 6 1 9 1 4 I l In conclusion Olil 1 A4 4712 0 1 i9 Thereis no scope for admittingstudents as thatwould 8eagainst the verysplnt 1 4 1 of statutes medicaleducation r 6io even if seats we unfllled that cann6tbe a 1 1 m for making midmsession admissions r iiil There cannot be telescoping of unfilled seats 0 0 of oneyearwith seats ofthe I 0 year iv MCI shall ensure that the bodies fix a time schedule the durationof this 0 341 thedate of commencement of the course r course t Al andthe lastdatefot admisiot 1 e C45 V1 differentmodalitiesfor admissioncan be Ol worked out andnecessary stepslike holdingof 7 4 counselling andthe like 0a haveto be within the time vo no variationof theschedule so far as n1 are concernedshall be allowede 1 viil in ecase90f by the institution 4 pe actionis shMl be takenby 7 I 1 MCI InMridul Dhar case supralHonble theSuprceCourtwhile 1 1 I n I 4 the sanctityof the ancle time scheduleSxing P 1 issued irther directions The relevant extract of the same is 1 a1 0 il 14 1 1 e1 Suresh Kumar 2014.04.26 12: 49 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Il 1 I l l M Ila Il W0 1 mR0 9r el In O V S 4 ov ee n 129 14 t Wt 1 V lr4 i 7E I47 1 1 r 8 E Ii8 0t 1 1 i 1 1 111 4 Il 1 1 Illll141l 1Il 1 fl 7 43 te S I n 47 1 4 Illti11 4 4 1 e Sl 691410 24 dl 1 Il Il r i 91 411 35 Havingregard to the aforesaid we issuethe Il 1 1 1 following directionsl 4 1e Xx xx 2 Xx XX 3e Xx Xx 1 034 4 4b 41 411A14514P4 h P 4e It shallbethe ofall concemed 94 1 1 Chief Secretariesof each StatelUnion 1 r Territoryandlor Health Secretaries to ensure 0 C0 with the directionsof this Court and I C5 time schedule as laid down in the and would make 51 41 1 r themliableforrequisite penalconsequences 11 C 5 XX xx 6 By 31 October the States throughthe G15 Chief Secretariesshall file a reportin to admissions with the DGHS W2 giving detailsaDoutthe adherenceto a time 0a 1 e4 scheduleand admission grantedas per the quota The recalcitrant States ofOcers will have to face e theconsequencesfor violation Ill 7to 14 xx xx 1 1P 15 Time scheduleprovidedin the 1 shall be strictly adheredto by all ncerd r S 1t failing which tlie partywould be liable 1 tobe with 4 5 e 94i P 1 r4 1 14 9 1 Suresh Kumar 2014.04.26 12: 49 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document im m m Ill l 1 ee 91 e vIep rn i 1r Il e eo 430 1e 1 t 1 wll pIt 8 1 e 4 6 v ne Ir 7 1 e i4mw Ci sts l11 V 4 5 1 127 1 e el 4 01 9 r 44 4t I bm 4 1491 16 Copyofthe shall be sentto the I ll 4 b194 41 e 3 1pdnv e I4 1 1 m e 1 04 04 7 14s 14s 1t1 1 er S 1 1t 1 r e jr Chief Secretaries of all the StateslUnion 0 Il d le 111 e1 r 14t e4e o l A Territoriesfor 99 r 1 1 1 In view of theratioofthe aforesaid 1 contendedon behalfof the that of threeyears t1 trainmg COWSe lS and mandatoi so is the position of the 1 1 1 1 toMrAnupamGupta the Unisity tboK a t S conscious decisionto hold the examinationsof the studen admittedtipt 0 0 31 July 2007in MaylJune2010andthose upto31St 0 December2007 lll themandateofthe rules It I 0 1S 61rtherthe case of the that if the who were f Z t admittedaRer 31 July but betweenOctober to November 2007 are to appearin the examinationin MaJune 2010 theywill be 0 onlytwo andhalfyears course ive academicterms9whereas J a5 the of the statute Ordinance is 36 months six Io e 4 4 academicterms e r 7 70 MrTS Dhindsa and Mrshok Sharma Nabhawala ll 1 Advocates learnedcounsel for the have however 12 1 1 the contentionof MrAnupamGupta It is submittedthat the t P delayin admissionscannot be attributedtO e Thus the 1 1 mandateof the directionsissued in Madhu Siths case supra cannot be 1 r attracted It is er arguedthatout students dmittedto various PostGraduateCoursesin theyear 2007 180 studentsare beingpemiUed to appearin the examinations in May 2010 whereas 120 studentswho are admittedafterJuly 2007 are beingaskedto appearln the examinationin Octobel 2010 It is stated that even in respectto r 4 1 11 1 I l 4aL Suresh Kumar 2014.04.26 12: 49 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document m e 7 9e 149 mr Ir 4 31 4771 74 n 1 8 9rl It E 4rl I I 14 11 1 7 1 t 5e5 6 6 9 1 V WNo165 of2010 6131 4 4 14 i P rlit L 1 rl 54 1 1 theywill not be 36 months Ill 1nv r of course of studyon 14052010 and theywjllbe fallingshort of two 6 e e monthsandif relaxationis to be givenfo suchstudentethe are 1 alsoentitledto relaxationon the same analogyThe havealso upon this Court that the interim directionsdated 03102005 1nll 41 9 Mlee givenio the case ofDivyaGoel be extendedto the case ofthe 11 Is I haveheardthe leamedcounselfor the partiesatJengthand havecarelllygonethrough the noticed 1 r hereeineabove t 2 The havebeen8ameclby the MCIIDCI and are in e So is theposition withthe Ordinancesframedbythe Il r4 1 Non observanceof the sameon account ofthe circumstances beyond the conttolofthe authoritiesis one thingand askingthe authorities 1 tocommitbreachto grantreliefto an individualor some of them is another thingIn DivyaGoels case the was on leaveandthus could notattendand the course It was a orumstance which V with the Court and the directions were issuedto permither to in the examination It was a case of circumstancesnot within the controlofthe candidate In any case thisCourt hasnot laid down any law or in the order dated03102005 and thus cannotbe cited as a bythe or this Court It is equallycorrect thatthe studentswho ivereadmittedupto July2007 will not be 36 monthsof trainingin May 2010 there will 15e of one or two months but then the in the is not toe construed It hasto be applied in thebroadesenseand The University J 4 1 Suresh Kumar 2014.04.26 12: 49 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1mm2 i hA rmP9er m 1 V l IiSe S14 4 4errxni em9 1 Ir 7Z 74 1 Il 432 9 1 i4 4 e4 A 4p r 1 6111 Pii1 1 6 4 1 1 5r jC r 9 4 4 D 8 11 CWP of2010 Il 4e 6 M49 7 149 1 V 41E1 1 1 in its 1 tl in view various relatedfactors 4nl hold Ill 1 1 5 examinationsf thoseadmitted 4 471 4 upto 2067in May 2010 The ef 41 examinations will continue upto J S 1 4 21052010and thePracticalsand Clinical S will be thereaer 10 prescribes 36 monthS 4 0 the By thetimeall exhminations and are t 1 over it wouldbe almost35 monthsand has a substantialcompliance ofthe t a n e t6 regulationIn case the petitioners who were admitted months of 5 0 Octoberand November2007 are allowedto appearin 20104 Cm3 examination theywill be fallin short of almostSlX e rnonthsnd in that C 6 e 0 sense theywill be the course of studyin 30 monthsagainst prescribed 36 montlwhich is in statute 1 te 14 1 A The contentionof the learnedcounsel for the petitioners that C 1 r W r lrther to be rejecred for the simplereason can only 1t be f C45 1 Ite 1 1 S 1 0 amongstequalsOtherwisealso I conept0f equality the enshrinedlIl 0 e ea7 A1tiCle14 Of the Constitutionof India is a positiveconceptand be epa applied ln a negative manner so as to eitherperpetuatethe illegality or t COllit the violence with the statute The object lrl scope purportof Alticle 14 Of theConstitutionof India hasb6enconsideredbytheHonble 1 4 Courtin vanous The latestbeingin the case of State ofBihar Vs Singhandothers 20091 m 5 Supreme Court Cases65 whereinit hasbeenheidas underl 1 67 By now lt is settl that the guaranteeof equalitybeforelaw enshrinedin Article 14 is a positiveconceptand it cannot be enforcedby a Ill cltizen or court in a negativemanner If an Suresh Kumar 2014.04.26 12: 49 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 6 0t f o t Iee eaa 4ed 00 1Seeel1Lt 40e 4llilr 4 9V r 9 1 r 1 433 1 44 1 t v6 1 nrr on1 1 541 I e 0 Ur in51 vr 151 ol 4 r 1r 46 4 446rW 1 t4 I o r or 1 n has been committedln t 1 favourof any individualor a group of individuals 4 or a wrong order has been passedby a judicial t forum otherscannot invoke ofthe higher or supenor court t for 16 4 4 ee 1e V or 7 5 the same or illegality or 1 1 1 1 for passing wrong order e l Il 4 1 0 In the case of AnnamalaiUniversity by Registrar 01 C ee Vs Secretaryto GovemmentInformationand Tourism Departmentand C5 4 CourtCases 590 81rtherobservedthat relaxationgrantedto the necessary for 1t confermentofdegtee is t 1 Ie tr Honble the Court als 941 the nre of 9 5 framedby the Medical Council as in the 4 Ie 9n 08 1 48 n 141 e 0 4 of Medical Council of India l State 6Camataka r P case 0 tJT 998 51 1 74 Court 40 A similarview wasalso expressed m bsla Constitution 14 Bench of the Honble Court in Dr Vs Stateof 8 1 4 e