IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 26TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 4TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 25484 of 2011(I) ---------------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------------- 1. HAJID.K.P, S/O.K.P.HAMZA, AGED 22 YEARS, PATHIKKAL HOUSE, RAMAPURAM PO, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. AMEEN USMAN.T, THERAMBATH HOUSE, KALAVE, MAKKARAPARAMBA PO, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.SHAMSEERA. C.ASHRAF RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT,REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR,OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY,CALICUT UNIVERSITY PO,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 673 635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT,CALICUT UNIVERSITY PO, MALAPPURAM DISTRTICT 673 635. BY STANDING COUNSEL FOR UNIVERSITY, SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 25484 of 2011(I) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS : EXHIBIT P1 : A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE IST PETITIONER DATED 2/9/2011. EXHIBIT P2 : A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 1/9/2011. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE. ln ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).25484/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 26th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of 8th semester B.Tech Electronics and Communication Engineering Examination vide Exts.P1 and P2 applications and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs