®@ 0(3 I yq/ $§ngia &ench IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NOS/15%? OF 2011 Lal Bahadur S/o. Shri Amarjeet Singh, aged about ' RWAQ years, R/o. Govt. Girls Primary School, Kanjiya, P.O. Kaniya, Distt. Koriya (C.G.) M PETITIONER VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretaly, of General Administration Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Ministry Officer of the ‘Collector, Schedule Tribal Develoment, P.O. Koriya, Distt. Koriya, (C.G.) 2. " 3 (,4, . Principal, Higher Secondary School, Kanjiya, P.O. Kanjiya, Distt. Koriya (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA j ’ RESPONDENTS HIGH WRIT COURT PETITION OF CHHATI'ISGARH (S) NO. 4587 OF : BILASPUR 2011 ® PETITIONER Lal Bahadur Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Anicie 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri B.D. Badgaiyan, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.KA Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. Present :- . ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 12‘ day of August, 201 1) . 1‘ Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner‘ worl:ing as Head Master at Girls Primary School has been transferred to Primary School Podipara, Sonhat vide dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P~1) P~1) stating it to be on his own ln fact, the petitioner never made any application for transfer from present place of posting. Shri. Badgaiyan, further submits that impugned order of transfer has been passed by an incompetent officer. Thus, the same is bad in law. 2. I Learned counsel appearing for the W State respondents submits that, it is so, appropriate order shall be passed for correcting the defects the impugned order, within a period of further 10 days, in the event, the petitioner makes a representation within a period of five days. then, the impugned order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P-1) shall be given effect to in respect of the petitioner. 3. ln view of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for petitioner, nothing survives for 4. adjudication in this matter. Accordingly, the writ petition stands stands disposed of. No order asto costs. 7‘ M Sd/— Ashok SATISH K. ANGNIHORI