ii‘i ?i'i§ iii§ii CéiiRT $$ 33§f€RTii§§ T Eim§§ii§ (6G3 WRn‘ {km—mow ( s } N63430 OF 2%7 $§Ti?i§§§§ JSar‘ndeep Kumar Paridey Sio. Shri Harisha‘rikar Pai1dey, aged abmi 33 years, Gecupa‘iior‘n - / Service, Pasted a§ ASSIS‘tan‘: Iteacher facsied ai Govt Higher Secomiary Schod Mukdega, TahSii— Laiiurrga, Distt.- Raigarh ( CG.) Versus RES?GN§EW?‘S i. Tee State of Chhaiiisgarh, /Throug§1 ihe Secretary Deparf’me’nt of Schoei Educatiorr, D.K.S. Buiidiryg, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Trre CommESSiener , Tribe? Weifa‘re Deveioemeet Biiaepur ( C. G. ) 3. Dietric'r Education afficer, "r Raigarh Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.)" 4. Tr‘e Directer, eubiic -/ Instruciieri pension Bada Raipur Distt: Raipur (CG) K WRIT PETITIGN UNDER ARTICLE 226 6F THE CGNSTITUTfON OF fNDfA @w EEGH CGURT OF CEEATTISGARH AT BILASEJR WRIT PETITXON g S } N0. 3499 0fGB7 Sanéeep Kumar Pandey S/o Shri HariShankar Pandey, aged about 33 years, Occupation- Sewice, ?ostsc} as A$sistant teachar posted a‘L Govt. Higher Secondary Scheoi Mukdega, Tahsil — Laihmga, Distt. — Raigarh (CG) VERSUS '. 1. ‘ The, Sta’w of Chhatiisgaxh, Through the Secreimy Depamnent of School Education, DKS. Builéing, Raipur (CG) 2. The Cotmnissioner, Triba‘l Welfax’e Doveiopment B§1a3§ur (CG) The Dire-mot, Pubiic instinction Pension Bada, Raipur Distt. — Raipur (C.G.) EETI’?IQNER RESPQNDENT$ U) WRIT E’ETETION UNDER ARTECLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTXON OF INDEA : H li. on’bie Justice 8hr: Satish K. A nihot' Fresem: Shri Smt. Awadh Anju . Ahuga, Tri .P aim: Dy. Advocate Govt. _ Advocate for the for petitioner. the Siate / respondents. WE (Passed on '25 day of June, 2007) The question of law invoived harem is as to whether me petitioaer is entitled to reguiar pay scale with effect from the date of ihitial aopointmem or fa‘om £he date of completion of pyobatioh oeriod. ;1..“. 2. Leamed couhsel appearieg for the petitioner as weH as for the htate/respoodehts jointly submit that the facts and question of taw involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in W.P.(S) No, 5473 of ZGOé (Rakeeh Kmar Shanna and another Vs. State of Cbitettisgarh S; Others). which was disposed of Vide orzier dated 09.10.2006. 3. 111. View 03f the above—stated submissioo made by the learned couosel for the pattiesg the writ oetition is disposed of ia the same terms. NO order as to costs. I Sd/- f Satish K. Agnihotri Judge i l i . Amit 2 t