IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4335 of 2001 (O&M) Date of decision:26.09.2012. Rajinder Kumar Bhargawa ...Petitioner versus Gurcharan Singh Saini ....Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr. Jaivir Chandail, Advocate, for Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for the respondent. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No. 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? No. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? No. ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) The counsel for the revision petitioner-tenant states that he has already vacated the premises and the revision could be disposed of as not pressed. Petition is dismissed as not pressed. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 26.09.2012 sanjeev