IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.336 of 2011 PRAMOD MISHRA Versus RAS NARAIN KUNWAR & ORS ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sameer Ranjan, Advocate --- 4 11.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. I.A. No. 2754 of 2011 has been filed for condoning the delay of eight days in preferring this application. For the reasons mentioned in this application, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner was prevented from sufficient cause from preferring this petition within time. As a result, this interlocutory application is allowed and the delay in filing this application is hereby condoned. Now I proceed to consider M.J.C. No. 336 of 2011 on its own merit. This application has been filed for restoration of Civil Revision No. 789 of 2010, which stood dismissed for non compliance of order dated 18.11.2010. 2 It is submitted that the order stands complied belatedly on 20.1.2011. On being satisfied with the sufficiency of reasons mentioned in this application for omission on part of the petitioner, the date of compliance of order dated 18.11.2010 is extended till 20.1.2011 and the Civil Revision No. 789 of 2010 is restored to its original file and number subject to the condition that the order dated 18.11.2010 has fully been complied by 20.1.2011. Accordingly, this application stands allowed. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)