1 CWP-4.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4 OF 2011 Dr. Ashish Bhaskar Raut & Anr. .... Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents Shri Sandesh More for the Petitioners. Shri Y.M. Nakhawa, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JANUARY 21, 2011 P.C: Rule. The respondents waive service. By consent, rule is made returnable forthwith and taken up for final hearing at the admission stage. This petition seeks quashing of C.R. No.140 of 2010, registered with the Malvani Police Station, Mumbai for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 406, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The FIR was lodged by respondent No.2 Smt. Shweta Ashish Raut, wife of petitioner No.1 and daughter-in-law of petitioner No.2. Petitioner No.1 and respondent 2 CWP-4.11 No.2 have filed Consent Terms in the Family Court and had jointly filed a petition for divorce by mutual consent. Those Consent Terms were taken on the record by the Family Court. It is stated that the Family Court has accordingly dissolved the marriage of the parties. Both the petitioner and respondent No. 2, who are present in the Court, state that they have amicably settled the matter and, therefore, the FIR be quashed. Respondent No.2 Smt. Shweta Ashish Raut, who is present in the Court in person, has made available for my perusal her PAN card and is also identified by Advocate Vinay Brajesh Shukla, who has also furnished his identity card issued by the Bar Council. Since both the parties agree that the FIR should be quashed in view of the Consent Terms entered into by them, the learned APP submits that appropriate orders may be passed. In view of this, the petition is allowed. The C.R. No.140 of 2010, registered with the Malvani Police Station, Mumbai is quashed. The petition accordingly stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)