IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 17TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 29700 of 2011(J) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- P.VINAYAN, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.KILIYAN, C.L.R.WORKER, ULLANAM FISH SEED FARM PARAPPANAGADI,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA SRI.V.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REP.BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT FISHERIES AND PORTS (A)DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 2. THE DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES, PONNANI, MALAPPURAM DIST-679577 4. SMT.BALASARASWATHI, S.L.R.WORKER NATIONAL FISH SEED FARM MALAMPUZHA-678651 R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER E.M.ABDUL KHADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.29700/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE GO (MS) NO.66/11 F&PD OF THE GOVERNMENT. EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE SENIORITY LIST OF CLR WORKERS. EXT.P3:- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.A3/5122/07 OF THE DIRECTORATE. EXT.P3(A):- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.A3/5122/07 OF THE DIRECTORATE. EXT.P4:- COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BEFORE THE DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.29700 of 2011-J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 8th November, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner claims that he has been working as a CLR (Casual Labour Roll) worker at the Ullanam Fish Seed Farm, Parappanangadi in Malappuram District since 1994. The seniority list of CLR workers of 2009 was finalised and published. However, the petitioner's name was not included in the list. From the list, ten CLR workers were promoted and appointed as Seasonal Labour Roll ('SLR' for short) workers. The petitioner claims that he is entitled to be included in the list, which is Ext.P2. The petitioner has submitted Ext.P4 representation to the second respondent. However, no orders have been passed thereon till date. He seeks the issue of appropriate directions for the consideration and disposal of Ext.P4. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. WP(C).No.29700/2011-J. 2 3. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, Ext.P4, in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner also. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, (Judge) Kvs/-