IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 156 OF 2009 Shri Satish Choudhary ... Applicant. V/s. The Intelligence Officer & Ors. ... Respondents. ----- Mr. Uday Warunjikar i/by Yogesh Rohira for the Applicant. Ms. Bhagyashi Joshi i/by H.V.Mehta for the Respondent nos. 1 and 3. Mr. Rajesh More,APP for the State. ----- CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATED : JUNE 19, 2009 P.C. : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Mehta, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 1 & 3 and the learned APP for respondent no.2. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 3 seeks time as a copy of the application is served yesterday. 2 3. The writ petition filed by the applicant had been dismissed on the ground of non-removal of the office objection. There was no interim relief granted in the writ petition and only Rule was issued. 4. Considering the fact that the writ petition was dismissed for non- removal of the office objection, a case is made out for restoration. Accordingly the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 5. Advocate on record for the applicant will serve copy of the writ petition to the counsel appearing for respondent nos. 1 and 3 as well as to the public prosecutor and file affidavit to that effect within a period of two weeks from today. 6. If the writ petition is otherwise ready for final hearing, the same shall be placed for directions on 14th of July, 2009. (A.S.OKA,J) .....