1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1433 /2011 (Ganesh s/o Hemrajji Barange vs. Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University and others ) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : D.D.SINHA & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ DATED : 28th March, 2011. Heard Mr A.S. Chandurkar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr B.G.Kulkarni, for Respondents. This Writ Petition is directed against the communication dated 14th March, 2011 whereby the petitioner who is at Sr. No.48 in the Chart mentioned therein, was found guilty of malpractices in the Winter -2010 examination of of LL.B. V Semester. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to file a representation to the respondent No.4 for reconsideration of the punishment awarded by the Disiplinary Action Committee Cell, within a period of one week and prayed that direction be given to the said respondent to decide the same on its own merit within stipulated period. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the last date for filling up the examination form of V semester – LL.B. 2 examination is 29th March, 2011 and, therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to provisional fill up the said examination form. Mr. B. G. Kulakrni, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents has submitted that the representation of the petitioner, if submitted, shall be decided by the respondent no. 4 according to law and procedure applicable in this regard, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of such a representation and after a decision if there is a change in the punishment imposed on the petitioner and if the petitioner is otherwise eligible to fill up the form for V semester LL B. examination, he will be permitted to do so in accordance with law and procedure applicable in this regard. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for respondents, the cause of action in the present petition, at this stage, comes to an end. Hence Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE sahare