1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2991 OF 2010 (Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Nagpur vs. Hari Kisan Bhoyar & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. AUGUST 11, 2010. Heard Shri Kasat, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Khatti, learned counsel for the respondents. Shri Khatti, learned counsel points out that Respondents No. 1 & 2 have already filed Civil Suit and procured interim order. The contention of Shri Kasat, learned counsel is, notice impugned was under Section 53 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act and hence recourse to Section 286(3) of City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948, is unwarranted. The issue is rendered academic in present matter. The petitioners are free to raise all appropriate grievances in pending matters before the Court of District Judge and approach this Court in appropriate cases. However, it is made clear that trial Court, in which respondents have filed Civil Suit, shall not be influenced by grant of extension of time by the District Court in the matter. 2 With this clarification, Writ Petition is, disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.