IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10241 of 2011 VIJAY MAHTO @ VIJAY GUPTA @ VIJAY AND ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 07.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the husband and parents of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304(B),498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the D. P. Act. The marriage was performed in 2006 when the victim died on 22.08.2008. An U.D. Case was registered at Kanpur on 06.11.2008 but the present case was lodged on 24.09.2008. It is submitted that both U.D. Case and the police case were registered after several months of death of the victim. The police has submitted final form and the accusation has been found false but differing with the final form, the cognizance has been taken in the matter. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners, Vijay Mahto @ Vijay Gupta @ Vijay, Vinay Gupta @ Vinay Kumar, Kailash 2 Mahto @ Kailash, Sanjay Gupta @ Sanjay and Smt. Gulab Devi, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Bairgania P.S. Case No. 122 of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Sitamarhi, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioners if they fail to appear on three consecutives dates during trial. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)