WP(C) 767/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Ms. M. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Deuri, lear ned Standing Counsel, Irrigation Department. As agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is dispos ed of at the motion stage itself. Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case of the rival parties, I dispose of the writ petition providing that the respondents may examine the case of the petitioner in terms of the guidelines formulated in Achyut Ranjan Das vs . State of Assam and Others reported in 2006 (4) GLT 674 and the judgment dated 02.07.2010 passed in a batch of writ petitions lead case being W.P.(C) No. 2620/ 09 (Faziron Nessa vs. State of Assam and Others). Needless to say that the petit ioner cannot claim consideration of his case against any particular post or serv ice and the consideration will be strictly as per the parameters and yardsticks laid down in the guidelines. Writ petition is disposed of.