CWP No. 393 of 2004. 2.4.2008 Present: Mr. R.L. Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arjun Lal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG for respondent No.1. Mr. Baldev Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Chairman, respondent No.2 present in person informed that they will take at least three months to complete the construction work of the rest of the parapets. Looking to various difficulties, we grant them six months. Further, counsel for the respondent No.2 undertake to supply to the learned counsel for the petitioner the site plan within one week. On the basis of the site plan, if any suggestion is given by the petitioner or any other person the Chairman of respondent No.2 Trust shall consider the same in public interest and do the needful if the situation demands. As far as the parking of the vehicles is concerned, the Trust shall ensure as much number of vehicles are allowed to go up which can be accommodated in the car parking and in such situation the respondents shall evolve a mechanism for allowing the number of vehicles going up and coming down. It is further clarified that certain vehicles which are going to some village(s) be allowed to go. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of Interim order stands discharged. ( Jagdish Bhalla ), C.J. April 2, 2008. ( Dev Darshan Sud ), J. (rks)