1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 2894 of 2009 Satpalsingh and Mahindrasingh v. State of Maharashtra -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr S.A. Jaiswal, Adv for applicants Mr A. Parihar, APP for State Coram: A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 2nd September 2009 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for applicants that applicants have been arrested only on suspicion and that ingredients of offence punishable under Section 407 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code are not attracted at all even prima facie. Learned APP opposed the application contending that offence is serious one. 2. Applicants are in custody since 26th June 2009. Looking to the fact that manager of concerned Transport Company and driver on the vehicle have already been released on bail, in my opinion, applicants also deserve to be released on bail on parity. 3. Applicants be released on bail in Crime No. 13/09 registered with Police Station, Pandharkawda under Section 407 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code upon their executing PR Bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each with one or more solvent sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court below. Applicants shall not tamper with 2 prosecution evidence in any manner and shall attend trial after charge- sheet is filed. Applicants shall leave their permanent address with telephone/ cell phone number, if any, with the Investigating Officer as also the Court concerned. Application disposed of. Hamdast. Judge. hsj