wp8246-10.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8246 OF 2010 Sudam Dnyaneshwar Choudhari & Ors. .. Petitioners Versus Haribhau Padwal & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Joshi C.S., for petitioner Mr.Drupad S. Patil for respondent Nos.1 to 8 and 10 CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 10th JUNE 2011. P.C.: 1] Heard Mr.Joshi for petitioner and Mr.Patil for respondent Nos. 1, 2, 8 and 10. The petition does not survive against respondent Nos. 9 and 11 because they are admittedly dead. 2] In all fairness it is stated that respondent Nos. 1, 2, 8 and 10 are the only heirs and legal representatives of the deceased Hirabai Shankar Shinde and Shantabai Mahadu Kakade. If the petitioner makes necessary amendments to the wp8246-10.doc 2 application already pending before the Commissioner within a period of two weeks from today, in the facts peculiar to this case, delay would stand condoned and then the Additional Commissioner, Pune will hear the application on merits and in accordance with law. If the amendments are not carried out and the petitioner does not take steps to serve the amended copy on respondents within two weeks thereafter, the Revision Application will stand dismissed without any further reference to Court. If amendments are carried out and copies are served, the Additional Commissioner will hear the parties on merits and pass reasoned order without being influenced by any of the observations made in the impugned order. In the result, the order dated 9th July 2010 stands substituted as above. The petition is allowed accordingly. No costs. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)