Writ Petition no. 25197 of 1999-old number Writ Petition no. 3515 (S/S) of 2001-New number Kirti Ram---- Petitioner Versus State of U.P. and others Respondents Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal no. 3634 of 1998 State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned S.C. agree that direction may be given to the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioner in the light of the said judgment of the Apex Court in case his case is covered by the said judgment. Therefore, I direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner and in case the petitioner is still continuing as daily wager and his case is also covered by the aforesaid judgment, the respondents may consider for regularization of the services of the petitioner in view of the aforesaid judgment of the Apex Court. The writ petition is disposed off. Let the necessary exercise be done within a period of six weeks. M.M. Ghildiyal J. August 13, 2003 MPS