^Al^^^ '.^y^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Sif»l»BencS CiviS Revision Hl /2006 REVISIONER PETITIONER: Mahendra Kumar S/o Kalicharan aged .NONAPPLICANT t about 28 yeas, Cast Chikwa, R/o Dalli Rajhara, Ward No. 25 Jagjivan Ram Ward, Tahsil Balod Distt. Durg (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS PETITIONER ^ 1 ^, ^gwan Singh S/o Chabilal aged about 41 year caste -Garariya ^ 2.^ R/o Dalli Rajhara Ward No. 25 Jagjivan Ram ward Tahsil Baiod Distt. Durg (C.G.) Returning Officer, Sub Divisional Officer Dalli Rajhara, Tahsil - Balod Distt. Durg (C.G.) CIVIL REVISION W3 26(2) OF C.G. MUNICIPALTIES ACT, 1961 —78 3TT^T 'SFT f<Tl1®h '?T^T ^T^T "^TW Kvr <nH<tl <b*1ich T^T T^II<Llld14, ^tll^Ko, f^Krll^y . c.^. ^- /. "f^t 200 ^ ^T^T TI^EP ( y^<^) ^cITW^ftU 3?TT^T l,^_Koir&ie sna_«jysic^iM.K,^Aaj Shrl Jjtendra Gupta, counsel |< None fornon-applicant No.1. Shri Sumeet Verma, counsel The instant revlslo.n.is direct4: 20Q6 by Addl. DJstrict Judg^ 01/2005 whereby and wbereunder-tl| ofWard IVJember'has Shrl Sumeet Verma, learnecj submits that .the from to fbr five years ^ election has already 'held and| therefore, thls The aforesaid contentlon tespondent.No.2 Js not by tf In. vlew -of the fact been over and fresh electlon has air^ not reguire for. declsion on'merits. Accordingly, the infructuous. ' . <=hNid41^ ^Hdl' ^f fetzt <f^^K ^3^Rm3T?^T |or the applicant. |or non-applrcant No.2. |d the order 13-10- Balod, Dlstrict Durg in MJC No. |e electjon of the on the ired null'andvoid. counse! for non-appiJcant No.2 |held fbr the conirrtenclng |nd the Is over, the [fresh has |?n has become Infructuous. piA forth by the for |e the electlon period has already he!d< thls petltlon as has Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge rf'