IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9166 of 2011 Ram Narayan Rai & Anr Versus Sheojee Rai & Anr ----------- 3. 28.06.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application has been filed against the order dated 29.7.2009 passed by learned Munsif 2nd, Samastipur in Title Suit No. 4 of 2007 as contained in Annexure 1 and also for quashing the order dated 4.3.2011 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Tract Court-1st, Samastipur in Misc. Appeal No. 13 of 2009 as contained in Annexure 2 whereby, the order passed by the learned Munsif 2nd to return the plaint to the plaintiff on the ground that the valuation of the suit should have been Rs.66,000/- and learned Munsif has got no jurisdiction to try the same has been confirmed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court – 1st, Samastipur. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that so far the prayer is concerned plaintiff prayed for declaration that the sale deed dated 27.7.2006 as null and void and the deed relates to 7 decimal and the plaintiff is claiming only 4 ½ dhoors and, therefore, the plaintiff valued the suit at Rs.25,000/- only. From perusal of the plaint it appears that the 2 plaintiff has prayed for declaration of the sale deed as a whole. After considering the evidences in the suit the learned Munsif came to the conclusion that the plaintiff has wrongly valued the suit Rs.25,000/-. Since the whole sale deed has been challenged, the plaintiff is required to value the suit at Rs.66,000/-. The appellate court confirmed this order. In such circumstances, in writ jurisdiction the finding of the court below cannot be interfered with. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. S.S. (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)