IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37667 of 2009 1. DR.SHASHI KANT YADAV S/O SRI RAMAKANT YADAV. RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-CHAPRAM, P.S.-MADHEPUR, DISTRICT-MADHUBANI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 24/12/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as also for the informant who has appeared suo motu. The defence in a police case under Sections-498A, 379/34 is of a divorce case filed earlier which has now been allowed after the informant refused to appear despite notice. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the divorce decree is ex parte in nature against which the informant proposes to take steps in accordance with law. In the absence of any serious or heinous allegations against the petitioner, let the petitioner above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, 2 Jhanjharpur in connection with Madhepur P.S. Case No.66/09, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)