IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2009 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1931 CRP.No. 490 of 2008 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 01/12/2007 IN EP.266/1998 IN LAR.69/1986 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, PALAKKAD REVN. PETITIONER: JUDGMENT DEBTOR/RESPONDENT THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (G) NO.II, PALAKKAD. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LATHA THANKAPPAN RESPONDENTS: DECREE HOLDERS/CLAIMANTS 1. PARVATHY AMMAL, W/O.KANTHASWAMY PILLAI, NELLIMEDU, CHITTUR. (DIED) 2. KANAKARAJ, S/O.KANTHASWAMY PILLAI, NELLIMEDU, CHITTUR. 3. NATARAJ, S/O.KANTHASWAMY PILLAI, NELLIMEDU, CHITTUR. 4. VARADARAJ, S/O.KANTHASWAMY PILLAI, NELLIMEDU, CHITTUR. 5. THANDAVARIYIL, S/O.KANTHASWAMY PILLAI, NELLIMEDU, CHITTUR. 6. DANABHAGYAM, D/O.KANTHASWAMY PILLAI, NELLIMEDU, CHITTUR. 7. JAYALAKSHMI, D/O.KANTHASWAMY PILLAI, NELLIMEDU, CHITTUR. 8. PASUPATHY, S/O.KANTHASWAMY PILLAI, NELLIMEDU, CHITTUR. ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 2 TO 8 ARE RECORDED AS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF DECEASED 1ST RESPONDENT, AS PER SEPARATE ORDER DATED 20.1.2009 IN I.A.NO.129/2009. R2 TO R8 BY ADV. SRI.G.SHRIKUMAR SRI.SREEJITH S.NAIR THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: I.A.NO.1403/2008 IN C.R.P.NO.490/2008 DISMISSED 25/3/2009 SD/- K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE //TRUE COPY// AHZ/ K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------ C.R.P. NO. 490 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 25th March, 2009 O R D E R This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the State against the order dated 1.12.2007 in E.P.No.266 of 1998 in L.A.R.No.69 of 1986, on the file of the Sub Court, Palakkad. The order impugned reads as follows: “No payment, no representation for respondent. So order to attach the movables given in the petition (schedule). Call for the report on attachment.” 2. The lower court records were called for and a typed copy of all the orders in E.P.No.266 of 1998 was also called for. It is seen from the typed copy of the orders that after 1.12.2007, the executing court has passed several orders. On 17.3.2008, it is stated that the matter was heard and reserved for orders. Therefore, nothing remains in this Civil Revision Petition. It is made clear that the petitioner need not produce the vehicles in question until otherwise directed by the executing court. No further directions are necessary. The executing court will consider the contentions of both parties and shall pass final orders. The interim stay granted is vacated. The Civil Revision Petition is disposed of as above. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/