SINGIF REWW [9-^/ ^' IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Tl No. ^ & G of 2010 Petitioner / ...^ ,^^" ^y •^y ^&'- '^ <^-"^'; , ^/ ^' Respondents (1) K. Bhaskar Reddy, s/o ShriK. Madhava Reddy aged about 46 years r/o H. No. 1B/903 Reddy Colony, Mancherial, Adilabad, Andhra Pradesh through Govardhan D. Makode, s/o Late Shri Pancham D. Makode, aged about 38 years r/o Hyderabad House, G.E. Road, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus ^(1) State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Department of Commercial Tax, D.K.S. Mantralaya Bhavan, Raipur(C.G-) ^(2) Chhattisgarh State Minor Forest Produce (T&D) Cooperative Federation Limited, A-25 V.I.P. Estate Near V.I.P. Club Khamardih Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) through Managing Director. ^(3) Managing Director District Minor Forest Produce Cooperative Union Ltd. & Conservator of Forest,^^(C.G.). / /(4) Commissioner Commercial Tax Vanijyik Kar Bhavan, Civil Lines, Raipur(C.G.) Before: Hon'ble the Chief Justice and his companion iudaes of the Hon'ble Hiah Court of Judicature Chhattisaarh at Bilaspur. Petitioner under Articles 226 for issuance of suitable directions orders or writs includina writs in the nature of Mandamus. Certiorari. Prohibition etc. 1. ii'p li". ir:i HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION m N0. 5696 OF 2010 K. Bhaskar Reddy Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others AshOk (Wr-it Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Advocate on behalf of Shri Neelabh Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER fORAL) (Passedon this 4th day of October, 2010) 1. The question arising from the facts astowhether the purchase of tendu leaves by the petitioner, who is registered as expori:er, comes within the purview of the inter-state sale or intra-state sale. 2. The aforesaid question already came up for consideration before this Court in M/s. Shyam Bih Works Ltd. v. 7776 State of Chhattisgarh & Others\and other connected matters and the same has been decided holding that the sale is "intra-state sale". 3. In view of the decision of this Court in M/s. Shyam Biri Works Uc/. (supra), this petition is dismissed at the motion stage itself. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge W.P. No.2060 of2002 (decided on 1-10-2010) K- if ^.