IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2010 / 1ST ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 28319 of 2010(L) ----------------------- PETITIONER : ----------------- JASNA JABBAR, D/O.JABBAR, JASNA MANZIL, MAMKAMKUZHY P.O. MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN SRI.R.REJI SMT.THARA THAMBAN SRI.B.BIPIN SMT.REVATHY P.NAIR RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER FOR ENTRANCE EXAMINATION, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR ENTRANCE EXAMINATION, SANTHINAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. THE KERALA PRIVATE MEDICAL COLLEGE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. PIN - 695 033. 3. THE SECRETARY, THE KERALA PRIVATE MEDICAL COLLEGE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, PIN - 695 033. 4. POST-MASTER GENERAL (POST & TELEGRAPH) DEPARTMENT OF POST & TELEGRAPH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. THE POST MASTER, DEPARTMENT OF POST & TELEGRAPH, MAIN BRANCH, KAYAMKULAM. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH R2 & R3 BY ADVS. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP SRI.V.VIJULAL R4 & R5 BY ADV. SRI.T.P.M. IBRAHIM KHAN, ASG THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 28319 of 2010 L ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that in response to prospectus published by the second respondent, she submitted an application. It is stated that the application was sent by speed post on 06-09-2010. However, when Ext.P11 ranked list was published, petitioner did not find a place in the ranked list. It is with this grievance, this writ petition is filed. 2. Going by the prospectus, the last date specified for receipt of application was 07-09-2010. 3. Learned Counsel appearing for the second respondent submits that the application has been received by them only on 08-09-2010. Nothing has been placed on record by the petitioner to infer that the application was received by the respondents within the time specified in the prospectus. 4. In that view of the matter, this Court cannot find WPC.28319/10 : 2 : fault with the respondents in not including the petitioner in Ext.P11 ranked list. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks