o^tei.tf in the Honble High Court of Chhattishflarh at Bilaspur (C.G.) W.P.(s). No, "^? 3^- j OT'-3996- Petitioner ^f/ CKiy /;^y A" .r)\ ? /;^ -/ ^ '"ft^y -?Ti7' // o' o' y 0 / ^ (1) Than Singh Ganjer, Aged 37 Years S/o Shri jagat Ram, Assistant Teacher, Girls Primery School, Pendkhani Gurur Block, District Durg (C.G.) p) PremLat^Sahu,_Aged48Years S/o Shri Beshu RamSahu, Assistant Teacher, GirlsPrimery School, Hasda Gurur Btock, District Durg (C.G.) J^) VedPrakash Bhosle Aged 48 Years S/o Shri Kalicharan Bhosle Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Sonaidongari Block Gurur ,Distt. Durg. (4} Kanahaiya Lal Gajendra Aged 42 Yrs., S/0 Shri Dhansai Gajendra l. Assistant Teacher Govt. Middle Schoot, Penwaro Block Gurur, Distt. Durg (5) Ghandhi Ram Sahu ,Aged 48 years S/0 Shri Prabhujee Arya Assistant Teacher, Middle School,Kanwar Block Gurur, District Durg (C.G.) (6) Nand Kumar Nishad, Aged 44 Years S/0 Shri Tungan Ram Nishad, Assistant Teacher, Pry. Schoot, Deyabati Gurur Block, District Durg (C.G.) ( 7 ) Mahendra Kumar Sonwani, Aged 48 Years S/o Shri Ram Kumar Sonwani, Assistant Teacher, Primary Schoot, Sonaidongari GururBlock, DiStrictDurg (C.G.) (8) Ku. Hemlata Sahu, Aged 45Years S/o Shri Suman Sahu, Assistant Teacher, Middle School, Kanri Gurur Block, District Durg (C.G.) ResDOndent (9^Narayai'ilal®ahy,Aged35'?ears ^^^ ^ Assistant.Teacher Govt. MiddleSchi3ot,Palari f BlocKGyrHr, E)istrictDyrg<C.G.) (10)SmtMinstksttiSc)re,Aged42Year& VWOShriDhiragr AssistantTeacher Govt.13rimerySGhool,Thel<nvadheh Btock .Gurur, District Durg (C. G.) Yersus (1) State Govt. Qf Ghhattisgarh Through;-SeGretary, TribalWeifareDepartn-ient&EcluGatiori Department, D.K.S. Bhawan^Raipur :.(C.O.).:,.,.,:'Y,.,;':;^^ (2) Assi$tant CQtnmissioner, ' TribalWelfareDepartment ><Durg(C,G.)l,: •.' ••..^ (3) DistriGtEducatidnOfficer, Durg.(C.G;) Writ petition under^rticles^6'Nhthe GoiTStjtytion^ ^ forissuanceofwritihithenatureoflVlANt^ :.fl ^z. HI6H COUKT OF CHH»<TriS6<4RHAT BILASPUR W. P. (S)No. 736 of 2007 Petitioners ; Than Smgh fianjer and others Versus Re^iondents : State 6ovt. of Chhottisgarh cmd others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. AgnlhaM. J sr. Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Satish Sup-ta, C)y. 6ovt. Advocate for the respondents/State. ^- ORDER Passed on 7th day of February, 2007) The foltowing order of Ihe Court is passed by Satish K. Agnlhotri. J. 1. Learned counsel oppeoring for the petitioners <»s well as leamed Deputy $ovemment Advocate oppearing for the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts of the present case te similar to that of in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006 (Sushil Tiwari & others Vs. State 6ovt. of Chhattisgou+i & others), which was allowed vide order dated 7t November, 2006. They further aibmit that the question of law involved is also the same. 2. In view of the above stated aibmissions made by leamed counset for the part'ies, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order dated 7th November, 2006 passed by this Court in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006. No order cis to costs. Sd/- Thakur Satish K. Agnihoti Judge n