IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.632 of 2008 PURUSHOTTAM THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the appellant : Mr. Upendra Kumar Chaubey, dvocate For the respondents : Mr. Lalit Kishore, Additional Advocate General-III Mr. Satyabir Bharti, Junior counsel to Additional Advocate General-III ------- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ------ Dated, the 18th August, 2008 Even if we condone the delay in filing the appeal for which an application ( I.A.No.4906/08) has been made, in our considered view, the appeal does not deserve to be admitted. 2. The Single Judge has noticed in the impugned order thus: “ This writ petition has been preferred for a direction to respondent nos. 2 and 4 (Bihar School Examination Board) to publish the petitioner’s result for the Teachers’ Training Examination for the academic session 1988-90, the examinations of which were conducted by respondent nos. 2 and 4 in 1991. This writ petition was lodged in this court on 8.10.2007. It suffers from unexplained delay, laches, negligence and acquiescence.” 3. We fully agree with the view of the Single Judge. LPA - 2 - is, accordingly, dismissed in limine. This disposes of I.A.No.4906 of 2008. R.M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J. Sunil/