l^s 3\.il @ ^' ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. N^^/2001 ./" WR!T PETITION UNDERARTICLE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1227 W PETITIONERS ^<^ ^y^ ../y.^' ^*'^ /v .^y..-•''' ^\/^ / ^•^!^- RESPONDENTS .^ f^ ^v' ^. VFD COPY. ^1-....<%^ rVA^ 1. Smt. Kiran Beriwal W/Q Shiv Kumar Beri^al aged 51 years R/o i, Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. ^hiv Kumar Beriwa! S/o Late Dwarika Das Beriwal aged 56 years Occupation - Advocate High Court, R/o Tikrapara, Bilaspur IC.G.) 3, Ashok Beriwa! S/o Late Dwarika ^ Das Beriwal aged 46 years Occupation - Business R/o Agrasen Marg/Dani para, Raigarh (C.G.) _" ' 4. Smt. Lata Beriwa! W/Q Shri Ashok Beriwal aged 42 years R/o Agrasen Marg, Danipara, Raigarh (C.G.) Vs 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) 2. The Chief Conservator of Forest, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Divisional Forest Officer Raigarh Division, Raigarh (C.G.) 4. State Bankof India, Through Branch Manager, Agricultural Development Branch Raigarh(C.G.) 5. Union of India Through The Secretary Mininstry of Environment & Forest, New Delhi. 6. The State of MaeNiya Pradesh Thr-oyg^ ftie MNstry of Foreste, Wilabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.R) XI-HC-22 3TR^[^"f •fT-Ti^ - ^T'RT^T^rf^T -y^ '^qpn^ra', ^wr?, f^ray M.e:...^.:..^^. '^i8T' 3^¥f^T^T^R ^Tft^ 24-09-200a Shri B.L. Deeinbra, counse|l Shri Sanjay K Agarwal, Dy^ Shn Pasakaj Shrivastava, c^ Heaid. The gdevaace of the writ part of fhe State authorities ia cut aad traiisport fhe Eucalyptu^ private laads, Accoixling to fhe petiti^i programme aad uuder assuran^ and traasportation of Eucalypt|L Eucalyptus & Baaiboo trces put up fhe plaatation tiiey ha(| rcpaynient of baak loaii, fhe aufhorities for pemiission to cut fhe iaconie derived fherefroin betitioners is to the uiaction on fhe tl^e no action haviag bein^g taken approached fhis Court for reUef. ^mt^h ^TR^f ^ f^t Tf^R?R ^ 3l1^TH 31T^T for tfie petitioners. Advocate General for ffcie State, >unsel for fhe respondent No.5, ^.ot graatuig pennission for them to & Bamboo trees staadmg over their }ners, under the Social Forestay )e of getticig pennission for cutting t|iis & Bamboo trces fhey had put ion on fheir lands. In order to pla^itati also ,taken baak loaa aad for p4titioners had approached the State jaiid transport the trees so that froia fb|e bank loans coiild be cleared. But on fheir appUcatlons, they have -2-- [^t^^Ri^ XI-HC-22 STI^T ^r l^ra'^n^? iF^iW^ft^T. Roshaa. •"^- ..--^' ^ ^^ '^n^TRT^, ^ftWT^, ..^.^./V/8.'..^J..^.^J ^^^"•'-•"-'•••"""-""•-'"•'•"'•^ 290 3??^r ^<T?^R"^ftH keepi|ig In view of fhe Imiited grie^ance of fhe petitioners, no usefxil fhis writ petitiori pendiiig, as fhe stage. Accordiagly, fhe petition is CoUector aad Divisional Forest concejmed purpose would be served in same caa be disposed of at fhisj disposed ofby directing fh-e Officer to take an appropnate dec^ cutting aad traasportmg of Euc41yptu staddiag on fhe private lands prcferably wifhia eight weeks fmi^ fhe order, It is uiade clear fha< otf ConsequenUy I.A. No. 5493 Certified copy as per ndes. '^N^pfi^T ^rw^f ^ ft^ T^T^K ^3?NH3T^^T |sion ia ftie inatter or peraiission for [lypfcLis & Bamboo trees, which are fhe petitioners at aa early date, fhe date of receipt / production of the Court is not expressiag any claun and fbiat fhe decision shall opiaion on merits offhe petitione|rs be taken by appropriate aufhojrities on its own ments and m accordance wifh fhe provisions ia|force, Wifh. fhe above direction pe^iUon staads disposed of. f 2001 also staads disposed of. Sd/- P.C. Naik Judge ['T^^fe^