1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2152 OF 2010 1. Deelip S/o.Kochrya Padvi, Age-40 years, Occu-Agriculturist, 2. Minabai W/o.Deelip Padvi, Age-38 years, Occu-Labour, Both are R/o.Mothe Udepur, Tq.Akkalkuwa, Dist.Nandurbar APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT Mr.H.D.patil, learned counsel for applicants. Mr.P.P.More, learned APP for State CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J. DATE : 13/07/2010 PER COURT : 1. By the present application, the applicants have approached this Court for their release in connection with CR No.41/2010, registered in Akkalkuwa Police Station, in which they were arrested on 21/05/2010. 2 2. Heard learned counsel for applicants, learned APP for State. Perused the papers of investigation till carried out. 3. Perusal of complaint and other documents, it reveals that deceased Abhisha got married with one Darasing Padvi somewhere in the year 2005. There are allegations about matrimonial dispute as well as harassment on the count of illegal demand at the hands of her husband and these applicants, which was for the construction of hospital. It is to be noted that after 3 years of marriage, the dispute arose in between deceased and her in laws, and due to that she had left the house of her husband and resided with her father for about 2 years, and then returned after some settlement to be taken place in between her and her in laws. Prior to the incident dated 19/05/2010, on 18/05/2010, there was engagement ceremony of sister of deceased and the deceased was prohibited to attend that ceremony. It is to be noted that the incident of committal of suicide had taken place on the very next day i.e. on 19/05/2010. At this juncture, this Court require to consider one more aspect that the husband of deceased was released on bail by the Trial Court itself, as he is taking education at Solapur. Specific allegations against the in laws of deceased are on the count of illegal demand for construction of hospital, when admittedly none of the family member in the family of husband of deceased is a medical practitioner. It is informed that the husband of deceased is taking education in the first year medical science. Yet he has to complete his education, and nobody can predict that in due course, he will complete his education or not. In 3 the premise, even though there was death of Abhisha alongwith her two children, the possibility can not be rulled out that the reason behind her suicide is something otherwise. In view of this, even though the investigation is in progress, case is made out to enlarge the applicants on bail. It is made clear that these observations are prima facie based on the papers of investigation, and learned Sessions Court not to influence with these observations. Accordingly following is the order - O R D E R 1. Application is allowed. 2. Applicants be released on bail, on their furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each and on executing PR bond in the like amount. 3. After their release on bail, the applicants not to contact the prosecution witnesses. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/JULY 2010/cri.appl.2152-10