IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1422 of 2008 RAM PYARE THAKUR EX DAFFER ROBIN DEPARTMENT GAYA COTTON AND JUTE MILL, GAYA UNDER NATIONAL TEXTILES CORPORATION, GOVT. OF INDIA UNDERTAKING, SON OF LATE SHEO NANDAN THAKUR, RESIDENT OF CHAMARDIH, P.O. CHHATTUBAG, P.S. CHANDAUTI, DISTRICT – GAYA, BIAHR Versus 1. THE REG.PROVIDENT(PENSION)FUND (PENSION) FUND COMMISSIONER, BIHAR “R” BLOCK, ROAD NO. 6 PATNA -1. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, GAYA COTTON AND JUTE MILL N.T. C. UNIT GAYA BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK BAIRAGI BRANCH, GAYA, BIHAR. ----------- 03. 13.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent no. 1 as also counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent – Bank. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 1 stating therein to the effect that the petitioner is being paid the correct pension and as also annexed the calculation. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the calculation with regard to the payment of pension in the counter affidavit is not correct and as such, petitioner proposes to file a detailed representation before the respondent no. 1 pointing out the defects in the calculation, if any. In case such representation is filed within a period of six weeks, stating the grievance as also pointing out the defects in the calculation, if any, the 2 representation of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months and the representation shall be disposed of by a reasoned order which shall be communicated to the petitioner. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)