IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.H.S. ANSARI WRIT PETITION No. 22640 of 1994 Between: 1. D.Anjaneyulu S/o.D.Govindappa, Working in Sri Krishna Devaraya University, Ananthapur. 2. B.Samuel S/o.B.Isreal, Working in Sri Krishna Devaraya University, Ananthapur. 3. K.V.Sreenivasa Rao S/o.K.V.Subba Rao Working in Sri Krishna Devaraya University, Ananthapur. 4. N.Hemakshi Achari S/o.N.Panchanantha Achari Working in Sri Krishna Devaraya University, Ananthapur. 5. P.Sudheernath S/o.P.Hayavadanachar Working in Sri Krishna Devaraya University, Ananthapur. 6. N.Surendra Prasad Reddy S/o.S.Narasimha Reddy Working in Sri Krishna Devaraya University, Ananthapur. 7. K.Obi Reddy S/o.K.Linga Reddy Working in Sri Krishna Devaraya University, Ananthapur. 8. E.Rama Swamy S/o.E.Pakkirappa Working in Sri Krishna Devaraya University, Ananthapur. 9. C.Adibhairava Murthy S/o.C.Sreerama Bayanna Working in Sri Krishna Devaraya University, Ananthapur. 10. H.Rafiq Ahammad S/o.H.Vali Ahammad Working in Sri Krishna Devaraya University, Ananthapur. 11. V.Rama Gopal S/o.V.Parvatheeswara Rao Working in Sri Krishna Devaraya University, Ananthapur. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 S.K.University, rep. by Registrar, S.V.Puram, Anantapur, Anantapur(Dist.) 2 M.V.Sivareddy, Sr. Asst., Sri Krishna Devaraya University. 3 N.Narsimha Reddy, Sr.Asst., Sri Krishna Devaraya University. 4 D.Adinarayana, Sr. Asst., Sri Krishna Devaraya University, Anantapur. 5 B.Naganna 6 A.Peddi Reddy (RR5 & 6 impleaded as per Court Order dt.17-4-1997 in WPMP No.32749/95) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue orders directing the respondents particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent-authorities to effect the promotions to the posts of Hostel Superintendent by following common seniority list prepared and operated in accordance with service cadre rules of 1992 by following the strict seniority having regard the date of promotions in the lower cadre Further declare that unofficial respondents cannot be given separate seniority list in the absence of rules being framed or without taking the options of petitioners and others working in other establishments to have a separate cadre rules and seniority, safeguard the seniority in the cadre of Senior Assistants prepared for all establishments in the University and declare the action of the respondents as violative of the Articles 14 & 16 of Constitution of India and order to follow the Cadre Rules of 1992. Counsel for the Petitioners: Mr.P.SRINIVASULU (Not present) Counsel for Respondent No.1: Mr.P.V.R.SHARMA Counsel for Respondent No.2: None appeared. Counsel for Respondent No.3:Mr.E.Kalyan Ram (not present) Counsel for Respondent No.4: Counsel for Respondent Nos.5 & 6: Mr.H.V.Krishna Rao (not present) The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: Even today, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Proceedings sheet dated 10-2-2005 shows that as none appeared on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was adjourned as a last chance. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No order as to costs. ______________________ (M.H.S.ANSARI, J.) 17th February 2005. ARS To 1. The Registrar, S.K.University, S.V.Puram, Anantapur, Anantapur(Dist.) 2. Two CD copies.