IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2008 / 18TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 20661 of 2005(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SUDHARSAN, S/O. SUDHAKARAN, AGED 40 YEARS, SUDHARSANA NILAYAM, KOTTEKKAD, PALAKKAD TALUK. (OWNER OF THE TEMPO VAN KRP-2829). BY ADV. SRI.N.L.KRISHNAMOORTHY SMT.SATHYA SHREEPRIYA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD. 2. TAHSILDAR (R.R), PALAKKAD. 3. P.K. THRESSIA, W/O. V.C.JACOB, KALLINGAL, VADAKKOOTH HOUSE, P.O. THIRUVALATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 4. VIJAYAN, S/O. RAMAKRISHNAN, KADUNTHURUTHI, KINASSERI, PALAKKAD TALUK. (DRIVER OF KRP-2829 TMEPO VAN). BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMITHA SUKUMARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE DISCHARAGE SUMMARY ISSUED BY ST.MARTHA'S HOSPITAL, BANGALORE. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DTD.19.1.2005 ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT HOSPITAL, PALAKKAD. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY ACT. DTD.6.1.2005. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 10 OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY ACT DTD.6.1.2005. TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ========================= W.P.(C)NO20661 OF 2005 ========================= Dated this the 8th day of January 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges recovery proceedings for recovery of compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. Challenge against the recovery is not maintainable because the award itself is not under challenge in this writ petition. However, the writ petition is disposed of granting the petitioner 10 equal monthly instalments to clear the balance arrears, first of which will be paid on or before 15th February 2008 and the balance on or before 15th day of nine succeeding months. If the petitioner commits default in making payment of any of the above instalments, the instalment facility granted will automatically cancelled. If the petitioner makes payment as above, there will be a direction to the respondents not to collect collection charges. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE css/