W.!SWlM!,!.W!!,-S! lc? Petitioner HI6H COURT OF CHHATTES6ARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fS) No. 2141 of 2007 Single Bench:Hon1>te Shri Satish K. ^ihotri. J. Smt. Sankaliya Devi w/o Tunnu Ram, oged ab(»rt 30 yews. r/o Vitl. Purandih, Tehsil Pot, Ranoniygay, Oistrict Surgiya, CS. Soh-Sahaiyo- ^nganbari Kendra, Purandih. Versus Responden'ts 1. The Stote of Chhattisgorh, through Secretery, Mflhilo & Bal Wkas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawon, Raipw. 2. The &istr'ict Proywnme Officer, Mahila A Bal Vikos Vibhog, Su^iya, Ambikapur. 3. The Colteetoi', Swyay, Ambikapur, C.6. 4. The C.E.O. Janpad Ponchayat Rcnchandrapur, bistrict Surgiya, C£. 5. Smt. Raryita Devi Nf/o Vinod Kumar, aged abwt 26 yeors r/o Pwwidih, Romauygary, Distrtet Sirgiya (C.6.) Present: Mr. A.K. Prasod, cwmsel for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Ponel Lawyer for 5tate/req»ondentshto. tto 3. OR&ER (Passed on 9th &cy of April, 2007) 1. Learned coureel oppearirg for the petitioner submits thot the qipointment of respondent No. 5 as Aanganbadi Kapyakarta Purondih, Jonpad Panchayot Romchwidrapur, District Su'guja is dehors the A<ng<nbadi Seheme, The oppointment of the respondent No. 5 is bad on account of the fact that her husbond is a government servcmt and thus, dis-quolified for appointment under -the scheme. The petitioner is fully qualified in all respect for being appointed as AongaAadi Karyakorta. — s^s 2. Be that <s it moy, -the Collector, Sirgiija is directed to took into the alle9<itions made by the petitioner ond yiss oppropriate order (rfter affording oppwtunity of hearing to the porties in accordance with la«<md as per Adngaibali Scheme, within o period of foir weeks from tiie date of receipt of this order. 3. In view of the above, •this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. 4. Consequently, I.A. No. 01, application for gront of interim relief, stonds disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subhash