1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3981/2007 M/s. Hema Construction vs The District Judge, Rajsamand & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : - 12.7.2007 HON'BLE MR.PRAKASH TATIA,J. Mr.Chaitanya Gahlot,for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. It appears that in arbitration proceedings objections were filed by the non-applicant-respondent. Those objections were not duly verified, therefore, some objections were raised by the petitioner. After verification, the objections were submitted on 17.2.2007. It appears that petitioner sought three adjournments earlier and on forth occasion, the learned counsel's mother was sick and, therefore, the petitioner could not submit the reply to the objections submitted by the respondents. The court below closed the reply of the petitioner. However, by the same order dated 17th May, 2007, the court adjourned the case for arguments on the ground of sickness of petitioner's advocate's mother. In view of the above facts and looking to the nature of the proceedings, i.e., arbitration proceedings, this Court deems it proper to grant time to the petitioner to submit reply to the 2 objection of the respondents and the same be filed by 19th July, 2007 and copy of the reply be supplied to the learned counsel for the respondent who are appearing in the trial court. The next date given by the court as stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner is 21st July, 2007. In case, the respondents shall have any objection against the grant of time by this Court for filing reply to the petitioner, they may submit application before the trail court for adjourning the matter on 21st July, 2007 and may approach this Court for recalling of this order. In case, the respondents shall have no objection in grant of time then the matter may be heard by the trial court on 21st July, 2007 itself or on any other date but may decide the matter expeditiously. The writ petition of the petitioner is disposed of accordingly. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-