IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17353 of 2009 Nawal Kishore Singh- age about 62 years, Retired Assistant Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply Sub-Division Begusarai, Son of Late Deoki Nandan Singh, at-Khanapur, P.O.+P.S. Warsaliganj, District-Nawada. …………………Petitioner. Versus 1. The Bihar State Electricity Board through its Chairman, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 3. The Financial Controller No.1, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 4. The Joint Secretary, Engineering Establishment Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 5. The General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Mithila Area Electricity Board, At & P.O. Darbhanga. 6. The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Electric Supply Circle Samastipur. …………………………………Respondents. ----------- 2. 11. 12. 2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Respondent-Board. The grievance of the petitioner is that ,even though, he was promoted to the post of Assistant Electrical Engineer, but pensionery benefit has been fixed on the pay- scale of Junior Electrical Engineer. It is further submitted that notwithstanding the above fact, the petitioner further deprived by getting pensionery benefit on account of not grant of Super Selection Grade which he was entitled. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that despite representation, no final decision has been taken as yet causing pecuniary loss of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the Board submits that in case petitioner files a representation stating details of his claim, the same shall considered in accordance with law 2 without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his pending claim, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before Respondent No.2. In case, such representation is filed along with relevant documents in support of his claim as also certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks from today, Respondent No. 2 shall consider and dispose of his grievances in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation, so that the claim as raised in his representation could be settled without delay and admitted dues could also be paid with statutory interest. With the above observations/directions, the writ application stands disposed of. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)