.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.708 OF 2000 Dr.Sarita Krishna Kumar ...Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra and 4 Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr.Sachin Thorat i/b. Mr.V.M.Thorat, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.Niranjan Pandit, A.G.P., for the Respondent-State. .... CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 17, 2006. NOVEMBER 17, 2006. NOVEMBER 17, 2006. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the above Petition has become infructuous as of today. Hence, Rule stands discharged. [DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]