IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 125 OF 2006 M/S KARUNYAM HYDRO TECH SERVICES ....Petitioner REP.BY MR.K.A.THOMAS ARUL Versus THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND ....Respondents COMMISSIONER AND ANR., Mr. G.K. Sardessai,Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. P.P. Singh, Advocate For Respondent No.1. Mr. C.A. Ferreira, Asst. Solicitor Gen. for R.2. Coram:- DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 11th September, 2006 P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Solicitor General for the respondent no.2. The learned Asst. Solicitor General states that within a period of two months the Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal will be duly constituted in New Delhi. In view of the aforesaid statement, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of. All the contentions raised in this petition are kept expressly open, so as to enable the petitioner to raise the same at the appropriate stage. Needless to state that during the aforesaid period no coercive measures will be adopted. DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. sl.