1 APPLN 686/11 lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 686 OF 2011 The State of Maharashtra : Applicant. versus Akalak Mahamad Sahab Qureshi and ors. : Respondents. Mr. P S Hingorani, APP for the State/Applicant. CORAM : NARESH H PATIL & K U CHANDIWAL, JJ DATE : 21st JULY 2011 P.C. 1 Heard. Perused record. 2 It is unfortunate that in spite of PW No.3 being seriously injured due to throwing of acid, the prosecution had failed to establish a case against the accused. We have perused the evidence of PW No.1, PW No.3-Complainant and other witnesses. We have also perused the medical evidence. Investigating machinery had failed to hold Test Identification Parade in this case for the reasons best known to them, though in Court the complainant identified the accused No.2 as a person who threw acid on him. Considering the quality of evidence, we are not convinced that the prosecution has established case beyond reasonable doubt. There are 2 APPLN 686/11 infirmities in the prosecution case, therefore, the benefit was given to the accused. We do not find any error in appreciating the evidence by the trial court. There is no merit in this appeal. Hence leave refused. Application is rejected. (K U CHANDIWAL, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.)