1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C. A. M. NO. 2 OF 2010 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL STAMP NO. 17326 OF 2009 E. Waman Naidu & Others Vs. Rajendra Pal Naidu & Another Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders ________________________________________________________________________________ Shri Bhutada Adv., for applicant. Shri Gharote Adv., for respondents. CORAM: B. P. DHARMADHIKARI J. Dated: 4 th MARCH, 2010. Heard. After hearing on last occasion matter was adjourned to enable the applicant to satisfy this Court about the possibility of grant of interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration And Conciliation Act. Today prayers (d) & (e) in application under Section 9 moved before the District Judge are pointed out as interim prayers. When those prayers are perused in the background of the agreement between the parties it is apparent that grant of those prayers cannot be viewed as interim measure under section 9 at all. Moment prayers are granted the situation becomes irreversible. 2 Insofar as those aspects are concerned, I do not find anything wrong with the appreciation of controversy by the learned District Judge. Appeal as sought to be filed is therefore without any merit. In view of this finding there is no need to consider prayer for condonation of delay. Civil Application No. 2 of 2010 and the Arbitration Appeal Stamp No. 17326 of 2009 are accordingly dismissed. No costs. JUDGE svk 3 4 5