IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.12646 of 2010 RAM BAHADUR MAHTO s/o Ashish Mahato Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 27.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 363 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the accused persons took away the son of the complainant for employment on 19.10.2005, but did not return till 3.5.2006, on which date the complaint was filed. Considering that apart from this vague material, now matter has been compromised between the parties, let the petitioner, above named, who is in custody since 18.02.2009 and has no criminal antecedent, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, in connection with Pipra Kothi P.S. case no.71 of 2007, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will - 2 - be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)