VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS No. 42 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.2701 OF 2007 Bhartu Estate Pvt. Ltd. Plaintiff Vs. Mrs. Jehanara Acidwala & Ors. Defendant Ms. Prachi Tatke i/b Ms. S. S. Gokhale for the applicant/plaintiff. Mr. S. S. Purohit with P. S. Shah i/b Prakash & Co. for the respondent/defendant Nos. 1 to 5. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : APRIL 4, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. : 1. Heard. This Chamber Summons is taken out by the plaintff for amendment in the plaint. Though learned counsel for the defendant opposed the chamber summons, defendant has not filed any affidavit-in-reply. In the circumstances, facts averred in the chamber summons are deemed to be admitted. Hence, for the reasons stated in paragraph 3 and 4 of the afffidavit in support, chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment shall be carried out within two weeks. After carrying out amendment, plaintiff shall serve copy of the amended pleadingswithin one week. Sd/- (D.G. KARNIK, J.)