1807wp2219.11.odt 1 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR W.P.NO.2219 of 2011. Sau.Sharda C.Navarkhede ..vs.. Chandrashekhar M.Navarkhede ............................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ............................................................................................................................................................... Mr. M.M.Dhandekar, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. O.Y.Kashid Adv. for the respondent. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : 18th July, 2011. 1. The above petition takes exception to the order dated 16/3/2011 passed by the learned Judge, Family court, Akola, by which order the Family court has directed the petitioner to have herself medically examined in a Government Hospital either at Nagpur or Aurangabad from a Gynecologist. By a further direction, the Civil Surgeon was directed to submit a report within fifteen days from the date of receipt of the order. 2. By an ad interim order dated 4/5/2011, the impugned order has been stayed by this court and the petition has been directed to be heard and disposed of finally at the admission stage. 3. During the course of the hearing of the above petition, the parties have arrived at a consensus that the petitioner would be medically examined by Dr.Mangala Ketkar, who is a renowned Gynecologist practising in the city of Nagpur. The petitioner, 1807wp2219.11.odt 2 therefore, to present herself before Dr.Mangala Ketkar on 25/7/2011 by seeking a prior appointment with Dr.Mangala Ketkar. 4. The copy of the impugned order as well as the instant order to be furnished to Dr.Mangala Ketkar so as to apprise her of the need for the medical examination of the petitioner. Dr.Mangala Ketkar would conduct the examination of the petitioner and thereafter submit her report in a sealed cover in the name of the learned Registrar of this court by 28/7/2011. On receipt of the said report, the learned Registrar of this court to transmit it to the learned Judge Family Court at Akola hearing A.P.No.248 of 2009. The learned Judge, Family Court, Akola thereafter to consider whether the report to be furnished to the respective parties. 5. In view of the consensus, no further orders are necessary to be passed in the above petition. The petition to accordingly stand disposed of. The respondent herein through Advocate Shri Kashid makes a statement that the necessary charges of Dr.Mangala Ketkar would be paid by him. JUDGE chute