IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 21599 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION : 22.11.2011 Sanjeev Yadav .... PETITIONER Versus State of Haryana and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present: Mr. R.A. Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) Petitioner Sanjeev Yadav has filed the instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 21.9.2011 (Annexure P-10), passed by the Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority, Panipat (respondent No.3), whereby plot No. 1187- P, measuring 8 Marlas, situated in Sector 25 (Part II) Panipat, allotted to the petitioner in the year 2002, has been cancelled on the ground that the petitioner was not eligible for allotment of the plot under the scheme floated for Industrial Workers. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner has very fairly conceded that the said order, passed by the Estate Officer, is CWP No. 21599 of 2011 -2- appealable under Section 17 (5) of the Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977, before the Chief Administrator. In view of this fact, learned counsel states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail the remedy of appeal against the impugned order dated 21.9.2011 (Annexure P-10). Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. If the petitioner files an appeal against the aforesaid impugned order within a period of one month from today, the appellate authority is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law on merits. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE November 22, 2011 ( PARAMJEET SINGH ) ndj JUDGE