IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35532 of 2008 ARBIND KUMAR @ PAPU SINGH Versus STTAE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.9.2008. Heard both the sides. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case under Section 39/44 of the Electricity Act. It is submitted that this petitioner is not named in the FIR. The FIR itself would go to show that the premise of the petitioner was never inspected. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case later on. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in case of arrest or surrender before the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, petitioner namely, Arbind Kumar @ Papu Singh is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bond of Rs.5000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in connection with Naubatpur P. S. Case No. 30 of 2007, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)