IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWPs No. 1046 & 1047 of 2011. Decided on: 8th March, 2011. 1. CWP No. 1046 of 2011. Chet Ram. vs. State of H.P. & another. 2. CWP No. 1047 of 2011. Mehar Chand. Vs. State of H.P. & another. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Naresh Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K.Verma, Dy. A.G. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim the benefit of judgment of this Court rendered in Mool Raj Upadhayaya Vs. State of H.P., 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316. It is for the petitioners to bring the same to the notice of the second respondent, in which case the second respondent will get an opportunity to look into the facts of the case and take appropriate action thereon. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of as follows: 2. In the event of the petitioners filing appropriate representation(s), the facts will be verified and appropriate action in the light of the judgment, referred to above, will be taken by the second respondent within another four months. 3. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 8th March, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr/vs) Judge.