IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.22509 of 2010 Date of Decision: December 17, 2010 Veerpal Kaur & others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS Punjab Public Service Commission .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Pawan Kumar, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Saqib Ali Khan, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Puri, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. Two fold claim has been made in this civil writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, during arguments addressed by Mr. Pawan Kumar, Senior Advocate. 2. On the first count, it has been CWP No.22509 of 2010 [2] pleaded that Punjab Civil Services (Executive) Preliminary Examination 2009 is scheduled to be held on 19.12.2010. On the same date, examination for N.E.T. is also scheduled and therefore, the Punjab Civil Services (Executive) Examination should be shifted to some other date. 3. Learned counsel concedes that the issue cannot be agitated before this Bench as the issue has already been settled by the Division Bench of this Court. 4. On the second count, it has been pleaded that the respondents have not given the Centre where the petitioners are required to appear for taking the preliminary examination. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent– Punjab Public Service Commission has drawn the attention of the Court towards Annexure P-3 (at page 28 of the paperbook) wherein the following has been recorded:- “consult The Engligh, Hindi or Punjabi Tribune Dated 17/12/2010 and 18/12/2010 or website www.ppsc.gov.in for examination centre alloted against the centre code.” 6. Learned counsel for the respondent has pointed out that a public CWP No.22509 of 2010 [3] notice has been issued in the newspapers and would be issued tomorrow also, other than the fact that relevant information has been provided on the website also. 7. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) December 17, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?