IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 274 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 274 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 274 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 232 OF 2008 Dharmaraj Hiraman Bhrajmane & anr.... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra...... Respondent. Mr. M.S.Karnik for the applicant Mr. J.P. Yagnik APP for State. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 25TH MARCH, 2008 DATED; 25TH MARCH, 2008 DATED; 25TH MARCH, 2008 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The present applicants are convicted for an offence opunishable under section 498-A of IPC and are sentenced to suffer S.I. for one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- each in default to suffer further S.I. for 1 1/2 months. The applicants are also convicted for offence under section 306 read with 34 of IPC and sentenced to syuffer S.I. for one year and to payu a fine of Rs. 500/- in default to suffer S.I. for 1 1/2 months. Both the sentences are directed to run concurretnly. Thus the maximum sentence is one year. The applicant no.1 is the husband of the deceased, whereas the applicant no.2 is the mother-in-law of the deceased. The learned counsel for the applicants submit that the applicants were on bail during the trial and even after conviction, the applicants are released on temporary bail. The submission is that the appeal is not likely to come uop for final hearing before the expiry of the term of sentence. 2. Perused the judgment and order. In my view it is a fit case for releasing the accused on bail. I therefore direct that the appellants be released on bail on the same terms and conditions on which the appellants were released during the trial on executing fresh bail bonds. Application is accordingly disposed of. ...