WPMS No.780 of 2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Alok Mehra, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Bhaskar, the learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Vipul Sharma, the learned counsel for the respondent no.1. There has been a dereliction of duty by the petitioner in not supplying the information sought by respondent no.4 under the Right to Information Act. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the concerned file was before the District Magistrate and therefore information should be sought by the respondent no.2 from the office of the District Magistrate is patently erroneous. The petitioner is only trying to pass on the buck to another authority, who was not required to give information. Consequently, the order imposing the cost on the petitioner does not suffer from any error of law. The writ petition is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 28.04.2011 LSR