{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7385 OF 2008 Smt.Sangita Raosaheb Palve PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.D.G.Nagode, Advocate for petitioner Mr.S.T.Shelke, Advocate for respondent No.2 ....... CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND A.V.POTDAR, J.J. DATE : 26th April 2010 PER COURT: 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner claims suspension allowance and regularization of the period during which the petitioner was under suspension. 3. Mr.Shelke, learned counsel for respondent No.2, states that Departmental Inquiry is still going on against the petitioner and suspension allowance, in accordance with law, has been paid {2} to her. Mr.Shelke, states that if any amount of suspension allowance is still remained to be paid to the petitioner, steps will be taken in accordance with law. 4. We direct that the Departmental Inquiry against the petitioner should be completed as early as possible, if not already completed. The petitioner shall cooperate with the Inquiry Officer. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] drp/B10/wp7385-08