IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-5332 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 05.08.2011 Anil and another . . .Petitioners Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.A.S. Virk, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Sagar Deswal, AAG, Haryana. Mr.Bhag Singh, Advocate, for the complainant ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This is a petition for bail in a pending trial case registered vide FIR No.331 dated 14.8.2009 under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 452, 506, 302, 307 & 325 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) and Section 25 of Arms Act at Police Station Kharkhoda, District Sonepat. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are in custody for over two years and are attributed injuries which fall within the meaning of Section 325 of the IPC. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that occurrence took place at four places and injuries have been caused after chasing and that three injured witnesses are yet to be examined. He further submits that one of the brother namely Satish of the present petitioners is named in five cases whereas the other person who is involved in this case namely Mahesh is involved in 13 cases. Be that as it may, since the injured witnesses have not been examined, therefore, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of bail, at this stage. Hence, the present petition is hereby dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) AUGUST 05, 2011 JUDGE Vivek