HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No. 3272 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner, who is the judgment debtor filed this revision under section 115 of C.P.C. seeking to assail the correctness of the order of arrest made in E.P. No. 96 of 2008 in O.S no. 889 of 2007 on the file of the IV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The facts in brief are that the 1st respondent-chit fund company, which is the decree holder filed E.P. No. 96 of 2008 before the Court below seeking for arrest of the judgment debtor and to detain him in civil prison. The Court below after holding enquiry and after both the sides have let in their evidence, having found that the judgment debtor No.1, in spite of possessing substantial means is wantonly avoiding to make payment of the decreetal amount, ordered for his arrest. Hence, this revision. This Court while ordering notice before admission on 24.7.2009, has granted interim stay subject to the petitioner depositing Rs.50,000/- within a period of six weeks. It is stated that the petitioner has deposited the amount in compliance with the said interim order and subsequently, the 1st respondent- decree holder was also permitted to withdraw the said amount. Admittedly, the Court below, by the impugned order, allowed the E.P. only on the ground that despite having sufficient means, the petitioner- judgment debtor No.1 is evading to make payment of the decreetal amount. Having regard to the finding of fact arrived at by the Court below, I do not find any reason to interfere with the same. The revision petition is devoid of any merits and it is accordingly dismissed. However, since the petitioner has already paid a sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) in pursuance of the interim order granted by this Court on 24.7.2009, the petitioner is permitted to pay the balance decretal amount within a period of three months from today. On such deposit, the 1st respondent-decree holder is permitted to withdraw the same without furnishing any security. In default, the impugned order of arrest passed by the court below shall stand revived. Subject to the above, the revision petition is dismissed. No costs. ________________ B. PRAKASH RAO,J Date: 10th March, 2011 pnb