IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ICHHATTISGARH) W.P. (S) No. 5?3& [2009 / Sushri Malti Yadav, D/o. Late gm Roopchand 'Yadav, aged about 58 years, working ’ as Upper Division Teacher, Kanya Ashram Mutanpal, Block ~ Bastanar, Tashil — Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS o1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through ‘ Secreta}y, Department of school Exaininiation, Mantralayz D.K’S. Bhawan, Raipuuco.) ' / (2) The Director, Directorate of C.G. Public Education Department, Raipur (C.G.) / (3) The District Education Offlcer, Office of District Education Officer, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) The Commissioner, Tribal Development, Raipur (C.G.) Mata Rukamani Sewa. “Sansthan Samiti, thr. Its SecretawT‘ Mata Rukamani Sewa Sansthan' Samiti, Dimrapai Tahsil 85 Distt. Jagdalpur (C;G.) WRIT EETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA /The Petitioner named above most resyectfully submitted as under: — 1. PARTICULAR OF THE PETITIONERS As shown in the cause title. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS PETITIONER Versus EESPOEDENI§ State ofChhattisgarh & Others (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench: Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: - Shri P. S. Koshy, counsel for the petitioner. Shri P. K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 08 day of October, 2009) 1. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finally. M 1 2007 (1) BLJ 265 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Smt. A. Lall v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others1, thus the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to decide her case in the light of afore-stated decision. subject to verification asto whether the respondent No.5 institute is a Government aided school and the petitioner is a teacher within the sanctioned strength. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event. the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 4. ln view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 5. Accordingly. the writ petition is disposed of. udge Tumane