IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 17259 of 2011. [O&M] Date of Decision: 15th September, 2011. Banarsi Dass Petitioner through Mr. Mukand Gupta, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner has chosen to file this writ petition and seek a writ of quo-warranto to remove respondent No. 4 from the post of Clerk against which he was appointed on 4.09.1999 on compassionate grounds. The petitioner claims that respondent No. 4 was ineligible as his mother was in government service and he was himself a Contractor and was not dependent upon his deceased father. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner at some length, it appears to me that the writ petition has been filed to settle some personal scores. The petitioner knows respondent No. 4 very well as both of them are from the same township. The above stated facts were known to the petitioner even at the time when respondent No. 4 was appointed more than 10 years back. No case to issue the desired writ at this stage is made out. Dismissed. September 15, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE