CWP(T) No. 13940/2008 05.10.2010 Present: Mr. K. D. Shreedhar, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Vivek Thakur, Addl. A.G. for the respondents/ State There is no dispute that petitioner who was employed as a Daftri was also given work of a Clerk. Insofar as salary of Daftri is concerned, undisputedly petitioner has received the same. Now the work of clerk was given to him in addition to his prescribed duty by way of additional charge. It was by way of an internal arrangement made by the office keeping in view the attending circumstances. Thus petitioner is not entitled for salary of a clerk. 2. Consequently, it cannot be said that any legally enforceable right of the petitioner stands violated. Present petition does not warrant any interference and the same is dismissed. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. October 05, 2010 (rana)