(- h (o IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH, BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION N0. (C) 2P? /2007 T PETITIONER ^irantin Bai, widow of Manrakhan (RESPONDENT) ^ Chandrakar, aged about67 years, R/o ..-<"-/• ^T/y^c^."''- ...•• Village- Sirsakala, Tehsil Patan, District «:••' r^'^y f^r P-s^- VERSUS Durg (C.G.) RESPONDENT A-^' Jagdish Yadav> S/o Nandan Yadav @ ^o APPELLANT C!J/.^ I ^andwa> agriculturist, R/o. village Somni, ./ ,v'. .5.' ^ \} ^ Tahsil Patan, District Durg (C.G.) ^^ y /y^ y v' ^^1}L' ^' .XState of Chhattisgarh, through Collector, ^LM^ ^ Durg District Durg (C.G.) s^ETITION UNDER ARTICLES 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT/WRITS. ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION / DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS AND/OR OF ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE NATURE. T WW1! «»*<l<ft ^~EET •A|i<<iw<<,yiil'M''is, fayiyy,< ^^..t.^^.^Zfi StI^I TR^ (1?t3°"i1SI) sffi^rvi R-ii* wian^iiR^w lc- TOIIW ^ifei sn^i S.B. Hon'We Shri Justice Prasltant Ktunar Mistwra Panbl 23.10.2010. None for the p^itionw. Shri Rajkumar Pali, couns^l Shri Sanjeev Agrawal, No.2. The matter sras paesed] representation on behatf of the p^itkmer No one appears for ttiepet|tioner In the cireumstances, thetfe Court Ixrt to dismiss the writ petiti|an for want of pro^cution The (^tffion is dismissed fo^ 4»l^lf<rt4l'l7Tif?^ft ^f i^^l 'tf^i'^K ^rgiRm sii^i for respondent No.1. Lawyer for the State/r^pomlent over once m etosenee ot any even in the secoml ealt. is no other qiUon teft wth the want of prosecutton. Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge ?!frat^TfF^hTK^fra>E^^T:T'^(?i^—FS/i47~2/2010—1,00,000.