IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PBTITFON rSTl N0. ^^ ^ /2011 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INOIA, PETITIONER RESPONDENTS D^--^ 1. >'^<^ '.^ ^..^ s^'.<^ ^w^' 2; '.-•^- ^•'^..y ff 3. 4. 5. 6. fr Smt. Phoolwasan, Widow of Late Halalu Ram Gond, aged about 50 years, Resident of - Koyalibeda, Janpad Panchayat - Koyalibeda, District - Kanker (Chhattisgarh). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Secretary, Department of Village Panchayat & Rural Development, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG) The Accountant General, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur. Collector, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat - Koyalibeda, Distt. Kanker(C.G.) The Project Administrator, Integrated Tribal Development Project - Narayanpur, Distt. Narayanpur (C.G.) 01. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER As per cause title. 02. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE RESPONDENTS As percause.title. "•-•^ T 311^'t ^il f^lNF wt3iit?i»ite h *(I*IWT ai*ir^> :3~?f "Hni<i<i, ^Tity'Ko, Ri?iiyy< _^...-..l^.feC5>)^ - W ^l '' ^^...........^.................................^...^^QQ STt^CT 'VWK Cy^s^vf) WWtflftTIW^t SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Ivlohan Shrivastava. J. 10-08-2011 Shri A.N.Bhakta, couns^l forthe petitioner. Shri Praveen Das, Dept<ty Govemment Advocate forthe State. Shri Santosh Kumar Tm With the consent of iearfied counsel for the parties, the petition is heard finally. 'his case pertains to gr Committee to consider the State Government, pursuant W.P.No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Kej^ or Chhattisgarh and others), M.C.C. No.105 of 2008 (Stat^ Mandal and another). ThusJ *i^lCT^1i tntT?if ^ f^t^ <Ni^Tt wsfflnsii^t \af\, standina counsel for respondent No.3. •vance arising on account of non-grantof retiral dues. Learned cour|sel appearing ror the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the ifnatter may be referred to the High Power Retiral Dues Committee. This Court, in W.P.No.4p42/2004 (Baijnath Mandal vs. The State or Chhattssgarh & others) an|a other connected matters, directed the Imatter of retrial dues as the disputed question of racts were involvelj. The Committee was constituied bv the o the order dated 1 9-06-2006 passed in Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Govemmem and order dated 13-3-2008 passed in of Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath this petition is squareiy covered by the judgment an-d order dat^d 31s' January, 2008 passed in W.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath jMandai (supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing forthe par^ies. XI-HC—78 SIT^I •9>I 1?sfW 'tTSff SrH^ shwcp Deepti „ ^"er"4i*iici<<,riTi1'H'is,[si(ni'Hy L^>) i^-o • *tWWI CtHieb 3ff^?I '<^V ('yf^'^t) 5<WtW W^ sn^i ^- This petition is accordin^ly office of the Advocate Gen^rai Committee, within a period ofl of this order. Thereaner, tt^e petitioner and orficers conceriled Committee shall consider and affording proper opportunity c|f and the officersconcerned m^y ~he entire exercise, includin<b petitioner, be compieted withirt receipt of copy of this order. The petitioner shall supjily State counsel as weil as transferring the same to the C^mmittee. '<>wl<-f4l-< wrcjj -fli feei (fot^it ^siRnw^r disposed of in the same terms i.e., the i^rai is directed to send the case to the 15 days from the date of receiptof copy t^e Committee shali issue notice to the •i^ed within a further period of 15 days. The pass order, in accordance with law, after hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner i^y fiie additional documents, if necessary. payment of retiral dues, if any, to the a period of four months from the date of pply one compiete set of the petition to the c^unsel for the Accountant General for Maiun' Judge