Mgn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.219 OF 2008 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITGATION NO.94 OF 2008 Amit Maru & Anr. ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents And Yeshwant Datar . .Intervener Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Counsel with Mr. Mahesh Agarwal and Mr. Kiran Bhalerao for Petitioner in PIL 94/08. Mr.D.D. Madon, Sr. Counsel with Mr. C.S. Balsara, and Mr. Mohamed Himayatulla, i/b. Negandhi Shah & Himayatulla for Petitioners in WP no.2443/08. Mr. C.S. Balsara i/b. Y.E. Moomen for Petitioner in WP No.2364/09. Mr. Ravi Kadam, Advocate General with Mr. D.A. Nalawade, Govt. Pleader and Mr. N.P. Deshpande, AGP for State. Mr. K.K. Singhvi, Sr. Counsel with Ms. S.A. Module for B.M.C. Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Sr. Counsel, with Mr. Pravin Samdani, Sr. Counsel, Mr. Rahul Dwarkadas, Mr. Nevelle Mukherji and Ms. Brigitha John i/b. M/s.Wadia Ghandy & Co. for Applicants in Ch/s.334/08. Mr. Yogesh Adhia for Applicant in Ch/s. 134/08. Mr. Robert C. Sequeira for Applicant in Ch/s. No.81/10. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 26TH MARCH, 2010 P.C. None present for the applicant intervenor when the matter is called out. We are not inclined to grant the relief of the applicant to be added as party Respondent. Hence that prayer clause is rejected. Similarly, the applicant cannot be permitted to amend the petitioners petition. Hence that prayer clause is also rejected. However, the applicant may be allowed to address the Court, if he so desires. Chamber Summons disposed off accordingly. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)