1 Lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2541 OF 2009 Dilip D Agre : Petitioner versus Manager, B D D Chawl and ors. : Respondents. Mr. Ashok B Tajane for the petitioner. Mr. Bharat Mehta AGP for Respondent No.2. Mr. Anil Patel for Respondent No.6. Ms. G S Jogalekar for the Respondent/MCGM CORAM : J N PATEL & C L PANGARKAR, J DATED : 12th March 2010 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The Petitioner has approached this Court for seeking writ of mandamus and/or order or direction to the Respondents to initiate an action for recovery of possession of shop Nos.2 and 4 in Chawl No.48 situated at B D D Chawls, Worli, Mumbai. 3. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner that this is pursuant to the order passed by this Court 2 that he is seeking this relief. Our attention was drawn to the order dated 12 th June 2007 passed in Writ Petition 780 of 2007 filed by the Petitioner. We do not find that by the said order this Court had directed the Respondents/Corporation to remove Respondent No. 6. The Petitioner also initiated contempt proceeding for implementation of the order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.780 of 2007. The same was also disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation in the matter. 4. Whatever may be the case, we find that there is no cause of action in favour of the Petitioner to seek such a relief for the reason that the Petitioner has no interest in the adjoining shop where the Respondent No.6 is carrying out his business. It appears that the Petitioner is annoyed with the manner in which the Respondent No.6 is conducting his shop. We therefore dismiss this petition. (J N Patel, J) (C L Pangarkar, J)