1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3045 OF 1999 Balkrishna Zingaraji Mirge Vs. M. L. Chouhan & Others ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. J. S. Mokadam Adv for respondent-2. CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL J. DATED: 5 th AUGUST, 2010. Counsel for the petitioner inspite of last three opportunities when called, absent. Controversy between the petitioner and the Zilla Parishad revolves to a sum of Rs. 6531/- purported to be audit recovery on account of excess recovery of salary and allowance. Learned Member Industrial Court by order dated 23rd April 1999, evaluated the documentary evidence and the result of the departmental enquiry in the matter and found that there was no unfair labour practice on 2 the part of the respondent when they deducted an amount of Rs. 16,531/- from the account of the petitioner. During the course of submission learned counsel for respondent informs, an amount of Rs. 10,000/- is reimbursed to the petitioner reflecting the order itself. The controversy, as could be seen is revolving to Rs. 6531/- highlighted by the learned Judge in para 9 and 10 of the order. Analysis of evidence carried by the learned Member Industrial Court, the fact situation cannot be said to be contrary to the documents. Complaint having lack merit, faced with dismissal and I do not find any illegality in the order, writ petition lacks merit. Dismissed. No costs. JUDGE svk 3