@ Him-I CGURT OF CHHATrIsGARI—i, Bxmswa WE. {S} No. 5999 of 2907 PETITIOWER 1 . Smt. Kiran Choudhali, Age about 59 wars Assistant Teacher, S/o Shri’ Rajkumar Choudhari, Primary School KaSaridih, District Durg (C.G.) 2n Shandhya Shivramwar Age about 55 yaars, Assistant Teacher , W/o Shri Ashok Soni, Primaxy School Camp—1 Bhilai {Durg‘}, District Durg (C.G.) 3. Ballu Ram Chandrakar, Ago about 55 years, Ass‘istant ,Téacher, S/o Shri Hesm Lal Charxdrakar, Primaxy Schoo‘i Camp-1, Bhiiai (Burg) 'District Durg (C,G.) Versas RESPONDEN‘TS 1 State Govt. ofChhattisgarh, Through Socrstzuy, Tzibal Wdfaro Department 85 Education Department, i D.K.S. Bhawail, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 District Education Oiiicer, Burg, Dishict Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETETION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CGNSTETU’HON OF INDIA gppeaxance: Shn' Ajay Shrivastava, Couxisei for the petitioners. Shri AS. Kachhwaha, Govt. Advocate for the State on advaxice copy. QRAL DRDER {99. 1030073 SUNIL K‘IIMAR SENHA, 6' Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue involved 1'11 the case is as to whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scaie w.e.f. the date ofimtiat appointment or from the date oi'completion ofprobation peiiod. He submits that the issue invoived herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal. Jabalpur in O.A. No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of MP. and others), wherein, it was held that the similarly situated teachers are @ W.P.(S) No.5999 Qf’ZOW Entitled to regular pay scale w.6.f. the date of initial appoinmmnt. The matmr was taken up to ths Hon’ble Supreme Court 1'11 Special LEave Petition (Civii) No.6892i93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court upholding the uecision of the Tribunal to the eii'ect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scaie from the date of initial appointment. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits mat. this Court, While consideiing the same issue ii: Ram Kumar Sahu and others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh a11d another (W.P.(S) No.813 of 2007) by order dated 12.2.2007, has grahted regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submits that this case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Rain Kumar Sahu and another (supra). In View of that, this petition is allowed in the same terms. However, this order shall be subject to all verifications made by the State regarding facts pleaded in the peti 'on. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Shyna J i l i