IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI TUESDAY, THE 8TH MARCH 2011 / 17TH PHALGUNA 1932 WA.No. 1615 of 2010() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.35/2010 Dated 09/09/2010 .................... APPELLANT(S): 2ND PETITIONER: --------------------------------------------------- ANILKUMAR.N.V., NADUVILE VEETTIL, P.O.KARIPPAL, PERUMPADAVU, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.P.V.BABY, SRI.A.N.SANTHOSH. RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT: --------------------------------------------------- THE INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, PRAJOE TOWERS, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR. BY ADV. SHRI M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS,SC,IHRD THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/03/2011 ALONG WITH WA.NO.1622 OF 2010 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss A.K. BASHEER & P.Q. BARKATH ALI, JJ. ---------------------------------------------------------- W.A. Nos. 1615, 1622, 1637, 1846, & 1893 of 2010 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT A.K. Basheer, J. When these cases are taken up for consideration Sri. M.K. Chandramohandas learned counsel who appears for the respondent submits that orders of appointment have been issued to the appellants/petitioners in these case as under taken before this Court. 2. When the appeals came up for consideration we passed the following order on 13th December, 2010: In the statement dated November 30, 2010 filed by learned standing counsel for the respondent-Institute it is averred that the Director, as authorized by the Executive Committee, has considered the matter and decided that 22 Last Grade Servants/Part-time Sweepers, who have got more than five years' service as on November 14, 2006, would be permitted to continue in service on a consolidated pay of Rs.6,000/- per month against posts of Part-time Sweepers and Security Guards in a phased manner, considering the financial position of IHRD. The above statement is taken on record. The respondent shall verify the records and see how many of the appellants/writ petitioners would be entitled to get the benefit of the above decision said to have been taken by the respondent. W.A. Nos. 1615, 1622, 1637, 1846, & 1893 of 2010 2 3. Learned counsel submits that the appointments are purely on temporary basis and that the appointees will be eligible to receive a consolidated sum of `.6,000/- towards remuneration per month. It is further made clear that the appointees will not be eligible to receive any benefits from the respondent/employer other than the amount specified above. 4. Learned counsel for the appellants/writ petitioners submit that the appointees are prepared to accept appointment on the terms and conditions indicated in the order of appointment. 5. We make it clear that we have not considered the pros and cons or any other aspects of these appointments which, it is made clear, are only on the basis of the offer made by the respondent to the appointees which they have accepted. Writ appeals are closed in the above terms. A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE. P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE. rkc