BailAppl 6224/07 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH [1] S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.6224/07 Sangeeta Versus State [2] S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.230/08 Matadeen Versus State DATE OF ORDER : 04/02/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Anil Jain ] for accused-applicants Mr. N.A. Naqvi ] Mr. R.P. Kuldeep, Public Prosecutor *** Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the material on record. Father of the deceased lodged a report on 21st February, 2007 in which it was alleged by him that on 2nd February, 2007 his son Chandra Bhan [deceased] along with his wife Sangeeta who is one of accused, have not turned up and shown apprehension over certain persons who were named by him in his report. During investigation, dead body of the deceased Chandrabhan was recovered on 29th April, 2007 at the behest of co-accused Sangeeta. Accordingly, a case was registered against accused-applicants along with other co- accused Keshav u/ss.365, 302, 120B IPC. During trial, statements were recorded and it has been informed to this court that circumstantial evidence which came on record connects the accused Matadeen with the alleged offence. Apart from the fact that he happens to be brother-in-law [Jija] BailAppl 6224/07 [2] of co-accused Sangeeta, recovery of watch & voilet of the deceased was also made from him and so far as accused Sangeeta is concerned, on her information dead body was recovered matter is pending trial. Taking note of material and without expressing any opinion on merits, this court is not inclined to release the present accused- applicants on bail. Consequently, both the bail applications u/s.439 Cr.P.C. are dismissed. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA6224Bail Application2007 4-2.doc