IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 17TH OCTOBER 2011 / 25TH ASWINA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 452 of 2011(S) -------------------------- PETITIONER : --------------------- JOY, S/O.HENRY, AGED 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT AMALA BHAVAN, KUMBALAM, PERAYAM CHERRY, MULAVANA VILLAGE, KOLLAM TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.GEORGE SEBASTIAN SRI.S.JAYAKUMAR (PANAMBIL) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNDARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691001 2. MIMIMOL, D/O.CLEETUS, MINU VILASAM, KUMBALAM P.O., MULAVANA VILLAGE, KOLLAM-691503 3. CLEETUS, MINU VILASAM, KUMBALAM P.O., MULAVANA VILLAGE, KOLLAM-691503. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.P. PADMALAYAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(Crl.).No. 452 of 2011(S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1:- A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 26.3.2009 IN WPCR.95/09. EXT.P2:- A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 5.8.2011 IN OP(GW)288/2010 OF FAMILY COURT KOLLAM, EXT.P3:- A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 23/9/2011 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(Crl.)No.452 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. See the order dated 4.10.2011. The Bench wanted the petitioner to say as to what action was taken to enforce and execute Ext.P2. Today, the learned counsel for the petitioner says that no steps have been taken, since, according to the petitioner, it is impossible to enforce Ext.P2 because the party governed by that order keeps scouting from place to place. We are not impressed with the submission. The execution proceedings in the Family Court cannot be treated or categorized as toothless, having regard to the power available under the different empowering laws. We, therefore, find no requirement to exercise the authority under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Leaving open all other remedies, this case is closed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN Judge Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS