IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.4570 of 2011 Date of decision: 29.07.2011. Amarjeet Singh ....................Petitioner v. Sunil Kumar and another .....................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present: Mr.Narender Hooda,Advocate for the petitioner. Jaswant Singh.J.(Oral) Petitioner/applicant has filed the present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 12.5.2011 (P3) whereby his application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for impleadment in a suit for specific performance and permanent injunction filed by respondent/plaintiff-Sunil Kumar against respondent no.2-Naveen Kumar, has been dismissed. It is submitted that the petitioner Amarjeet Singh had entered into an agreement to sell dated 17.5.2006 with respondent no.2-Naveen Kumar for purchasing the suit land for a total consideration of Rs.2.20 lacs and Naveen Kumar had received a sum of Rs.2 lacs in cash as earnest money. However, no target date was specified. Subsequently, said Naveen Kumar entered into another agreement to sell dated 26.7.2007 with respondent no.1-Sunil Kumar plaintiff for purchase of the same land. It appears that since Naveen Kumar was not willing to execute the sale deed, respondent no.1-Sunil Kumar filed a suit for specific performance and permanent injunction against Naveen Kumar. In the pending suit an application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC dated 26.11.2009 was filed by the applicant/petitioner for being impleaded as a party. The application has been dismissed vide the impugned order dated 12.5.2011. Hence the present revision petition. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I find no ground to interfere with the impugned order. This court is in agreement that in the pending suit for specific performance, petitioner is not a necessary party as admittedly no right has been created in his favour. Even otherwise, the petitioner/applicant has an independent right which he failed to invoke within the period of limitation. For the reasons stated above,finding no merit in this revision petition the same is hereby dismissed. 29.07.2011 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge