IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 996 (M/S) of 2008 With Miscellaneous application No.4331/08 Km. Naima Khatoon (minor) through her guardian Iqram, S/o Mohmad Afzal, R/o Village Bharapur, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar and others. ….Petitioners Vs State of Uttarakhand, through Principal Secretary School Education Civil Secretariat, Dehradun and others. …..Respondents Dated: -17-7-2008 Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Heard Sri Ajay Veer Pundir, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri K.P. Upadhyay, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State and Sri V.K. Bisht, Senior Advocate with Sri V.K. Kaparwan, learned counsel for the respondent No.2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following reliefs: - (i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent no.2 to declare the result of petitioner as early as possible. (ii) Issue any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case be passed in favour of the petitioners. (iii) Cost of the petition be awarded in favour of the petitioners. The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ petition is that the respondent no.2 has not declared the result of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 has moved a Misc. application No. 4331 of 2008 to this effect that the result of the petitioners has been declared and therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. The averment to this effect has been made in paragraph No. 8 of the Counter affidavit that the result of all the petitioners has been declared. In view of the fact that the result of the petitioners had already been declared therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. All pending applications stands disposed of accordingly. (B.S. Verma,J) 17-7-2008 M.K. 2