IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 676 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Rajeev Thapliyal S/o Sri Ramesh Chandra Thapliyal, R/o Near Morning Wells School, Bapu Gram, Rishikesh, District Dehradun. 2. Ramesh Rawat S/o Sri Darshan Singh Rawat, R/o M.D.S. Road, Shyampur, Rishikesh, District Dehradun. .......... Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Senior Superintendent of Police, Dehradun. 2. Station House Officer, P.S. Rishikesh, Dehradun. 3. Vimal Singh Ranawat S/o Sri Ratan Singh Ranawat, R/o Village Kheri Kala, P.O. Satyanarayan Shyampur, District Dehradun. .......... Respondents Mr. D.S. Mehta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. D.K. Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 & 2. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Mr. D.S. Mehta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. D.K. Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 & 2. 2. Mr. D.K. Sharma, the learned Government Advocate, on the basis of the instructions received from respondents Nos. 1 and 2, submits that the police has already completed the investigation of the case registered against petitioners Rajeev Thapliyal and Ramesh Rawat to Crime No. 183 of 2006 at Police Station Rushikesh, District Dehradun for the alleged commission of the offences punishable under Section 323, 452, 504 and 506 of the I.P.C. and the 2 Investigating Officer has come to the conclusion that no case worth filing charge sheet is made out against the petitioners. 3. In this view of the matter, it is directed that the police shall not take any coercive steps against petitioners Rajeev Thapliyal and Ramesh Rawat till the filing of the charge sheet / final report against the petitioners. 5. With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. 6. With the above order, CLMA No. 6836 of 2006 also stands disposed of. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 19.06.2006 19.06.2006 G