$§N$LE BEifiE IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) wmT PETmON (s) No. 51f% /2006 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA! PETITIONER Vijav Kumar Patel, aged about 44 / vearS, SO“ Of Shri GhanSi Ram Patel, Upper Division Teacher, Government (Tribal) Giris Higher SGCOOdaFV SChOOl - Kansabel, DiStt. Jashpur‘ (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ’l. State Of Chhattisgarh, through/ - SECr‘etarV, Department Of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalvan Singh Bhawan, RaiDUf‘ (C.G.) The commiSSiOner, Department/ Of Tribal Welfare, RaiDUi‘ (C.G.) Assistant COmmiSSiOnerg Departmemt Of Tribal WEIfare, District JaShpUi‘ Nagar (C.G.) The Principai, Government (Tribali Higher seCOndarV SChOOi - Kansabel, Distt. 'Jashpur (C.G.) / HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(5) No. 5478 of 2006 1}“ W. P.(5) No. 5480 of 2006 Pe‘l'ifioner i Bheemsen Swarnkar Versus Respondems 2 Sfafe of Ch haffisgarh & ofhers Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Jus'l'ice Sa‘fish K. Agnihofri. Shri A.N. Bhak'ra, Advocate for fhe Pe‘l'i‘rioners. 5hri V.V.5. Moorfhy, Dy. Advoca're General wi'l'h Smf. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt Advocate for The responden‘rs/Sfnfe. ORDER (9“‘ October, 2006) . Learned counsel appearing for fhe pe'ii'i'ioners submi'r fha’i while working as Assisfam‘ TeuchersVUpper Division Teachers, fhe petitioners have gone on mining 1'0 improve fheir quolificafions on fheir own expenses and acquired B.Ed./B.T.I Examino'Hon Cerfificufe. . The presen'r wrif pefifions, being W.P.(5) Nos. 5478/2006 and 5480/2006 involve similar fac‘l's and common quesl'ion of law. Thus, 'rhese pefi‘rions are being disposed of by fhis common order. . According +0 learned counsel for 'l'he pefi'iioners, 1he pe'ii‘l'ioners are enfi‘i’led 1'0 Two advance incremen'i's in view of the decision of Pe‘ri'rioner : Vijay Kumar Pufel Versus Respondenfs : Sfa're of Chha‘f'l'isgarh & o‘l'hers And fhis Cour? in The case of Vashwanf Kumur Bhamdwuj Vs. Municipal Corpomfion, Durg and ano'rher {2006 (II) MPJR—CG 96}. This Court in fhe case of Yashwan'r Kumar- Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipai Corpora‘i’ion, Durg and ano‘i'her (Supra), came To ‘i'he conclusion fhaf fhe Teachers, who had ob'iained B. Ed./B.T.I. Examinafion Cerfificafe on his own expenses, are covered by 'I'he circular da'i'ed 24.12.98 issued by +he S‘i'a‘fe Governmen‘i' of Madhyu Pmdesh. . Learned counsel for fhe pe'l'i'i'ioners fur'iher submi‘i's fha‘l’ The fads and ques‘i'ion of law involved in The presen'i' cases are squarely covered by decision of 1his Courf in 'l'he case of Yashwani' Kumar Bharadwaj Vs, Municipal Corpora'iion, Durg and ano‘fher (Supra), 1’0 which learned counsel appearing for fhe respondenfs fairly concedes and agrees wi‘rh 'l'he avermenf made by learned counsel appearing for ‘l’he pefifioners. . Accordingly, fhe wri‘r pefi'i'ions are allowed in ferms of The order passed in The case of Yashwanf Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corpora‘i’ion, Durg and anofher (Supra), subjecf f0 verifica‘l'ion of fhe facf as fo whefher fhe pefi‘l'ioners have acquired B. Ed./B.T.I. Examination Cerfificafes on fheir own expenses or nof. No order as 'l'o cosfs. . A copy of This order be placed on record of one connecTed wriT pe'i'ifion. l Subhush l Sdl- ‘ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge