IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI TUESDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2009 / 20TH SRAVANA 1931 LA.App..No. 943 of 2009() ------------------------- LAR.370/2005 of PRL.S.C.,THALASSERY .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT NO.2 ------------------------ MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSIDC, REP. BY ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, KSIDC, KESTON ROAD, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOBY CYRIAC, SC, KSIDC RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANTS AND R1 ------------------------ 1. ERAYIKANDI SAROJINI, KARUNALAYAM, P.O.MOORIYAD. 2. DO. SAJITH, DO. DO. 3. DO. SAHAJAN, DO. DO. 4. DO. SANTHOSH, DO. DO. 5. DO. SANEESH, DO. DO. 6. DO. SARUNA, DO. DO. 7. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, L.A., THALASSERY. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.LATHA T.THANKAPPAN THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. ------------------------ L.A.A.No.943 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 11th day of August, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Even though the requisitioning authority is in appeal and they are aggrieved by the refixation of the land value from Rs.2148/- per cent to Rs.7,500/- per cent, having gone through the impugned judgment, we are of the view that such refixation cannot be said to be excessive. We dismiss the appeal, however, without prejudice to the interest of the requisitioning authority in other appeals preferred by them against the judgment pertaining to the same acquisition. In other words, our judgment dismissing this appeal will not be a precedent for any other case. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE dpk