IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1037 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO. 1037 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO. 1037 OF 2005 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 418 OF 1997 NO. 418 OF 1997 NO. 418 OF 1997 Anil Sonaba Jagdale. ] .. Plaintiffs Versus 1. Rashmikumar Jivraj & 4 ors. ] .. Defendants Mr. S.K. Jain for the plaintiffs. Mr. M. Hiralal for the defendant No.3. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED: 16TH MARCH, 2006 P.C. : . Basic suit is pending with prayers of specific performance. By this Notice of Motion, plaintiffs sought ad-interim relief which was not granted by a reasoned order. The learned counsel appearing for defendant No.3 makes a statement that the property now is in possession of third party. It means that the plaintiffs have already been dispossessed. : 2 : 2. In view of the above, nothing survives in this Notice of Motion. It is, therefore, disposed of with liberty to take out appropriate Notice of Motion, if so advised, in the change of circumstances. 3. Issuance of certified copy expedited. Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]