WA 203/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR MADAN B LOKUR THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE BP KATAKEY Without going into the controversy raised by the appellant, we find that in the impugned order dated 3.4.2010 passed in WP(C) No. 125(SH)/2010, the learned Sing le Judge has directed that the Deputy Commissioner should dispose of the writ pe titioner’s representation dated 18 January 2010 by a speaking order within thirt y days from the date of receipt of the order. Learned counsel appearing for the Deputy Commissioner submits that the matter wa s fixed for hearing on 26th May 2010 but the writ petitioner did not attend the hearing. Thereafter the matter was fixed on 9th July 2010 when the writ petition er entered appearance and made submissions. It appears that some truck owners from Meghalaya have also made a representation but they did not appear for the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner. In this writ appeal, the Meghalaya Commercial Truck Owners Association submits t hat the collection of toll at the check points is not permissible. Without going into the merit of the controversy, we grant liberty to the Meghala ya Commercial Truck Owners Association to also make a representation before the Deputy Commissioner within one week from today. On receipt of the representation, the Deputy Commissioner will give a hearing to the authorized representative of the Association and pass a reasoned order on o r before 14th August, 2010 in terms of the direction given by the learned Single Judge. In case no representation is made by the Association within one week, th e Deputy Commissioner may proceed to dispose of the representation of the writ p etitioner and the truck owners. The appeal along with the Misc. Case stands disposed of.