£5 HIGH §OURT 0:- CHHEWT$GARH EILR$PU§R Writ Petition No. 41 31 of 2mm (Writ Petitmn under Articie 226 ofthe Constitution of india $§: Hon’b§e iiiir. Satish K. Agmhota’i, ‘3; ‘""?€6"r§é~f6f §h§gf§i6£ié£ ~ ’ ‘ Shri Abk Bakshi, Gcvt, Advocate far éha State. Gmi. 3RSER lj?assea’ an 2"éday ofMay, 2w8} The matter is caiéed for hearing twice‘ On bo’t’n occasions, none appears nor is any representatEon made on benaif of the peiitioner‘ ‘me petitmner may not be interes’red in the manor. ‘\\, #_ in view of the above, ine writ petition is dismissed for want M oi prosewiioni w Wmwi ‘ r Sd/— g Satish K. Agnihotri i. Judge I Raju j " i Petitioner 8.5. Tomar, T7 years, Rad. Food inspector, #0, Ka!gi Read (Near TeEephone Exchmga}, Tah3§§ Kata, D§3t. Bi£aspur {CG}. Versu§ Resgomient Siate of Chna‘rtisgar’n, ihrough Secreiary, Hea!th & Family WeKare Degasimem, $achivaiaya, . aim? {CG}