K%WQ// ® $§ngk§ Bamh IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT pE'rITmNtsnNo. ‘SO:H /2011 PETITIONER : Mohax Sai sidar, S/o. Shri Hemram Sidar, aged about 54 years, R/o. Naurangpur, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS s RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: — Secretary, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Revenue Department, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Commissioner Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Collector, Land Record, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, (C.G.) " WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA ” £13 HIGH COI IRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPI JR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5071 of2011 PETITIONER : Mohar Sai Sidar‘ VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETYTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITI TUON OF INDIA SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Saurabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioner‘ Slui V.V.S. Moorlhy, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondems. ya Shri S.P. Navratna, Dy. Commissioner (R), Biiaspur, is present. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 06 day of September, 201 1) At the very outset, Shxi Moorthy, leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents, on instmctiom, submits that. the order dated 12.08.2011 (Axmexure P/l) impugned herein, has not been passed by a. competent authority in accordance with Rule 20, Part II, of the Madhya Pradesh/Chhattiagarh Land Record Manual, thus, the same is unsustainable in law and shall not be given effect to. In View of the above submission made by learned State counsel, d according to learned cgtmsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication at this stage. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 12.08.2011 (Annexure P/l) is quashed. However, liberty is reserved to the State/respondents to pass appropriate order, if so advised, in accordance with law, in administrative exigency and in public interest. The writ petition is allowed. No order asto costs. 1.