IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.551 of 2008 1. RAM BILASH PANDEY 2. UMA PANDEY 3. HARI PANDEY 4. SHAMBHU PANDEY …PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR …OPPOSITE PARTY For the petitioners :Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh For the State :Mr. Manish Kumar, APP ----------- 03. 03.11.2010 Petitioners assail the judgment dated 18.02.2008, passed by 9th Addl. Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in Cr. Appeal No.22/1998, whereby petitioner nos. 1,3 and 4 were found rightly held guilty under section 323 IPC, whereas petitioner no.2 was rightly found guilty under section 324 IPC. Considering the nature of allegations and the attending facts, the accuseds/appellants were granted the privilege of Probation of Offenders Act. There appears to be concurrent finding of guilt. It is further seen that instead of awarding substantive punishment, they have been let off under the provision of Probation of Offenders Act. This Court does not find any patent illegality in the judgment and order impugned meriting interference. The application is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )