1 5583.10-wp bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5583 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2672 OF 2010 Uttam Rangrao Jadhav ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents Mr.S.S.Patwardhan for petitioner. Mr.Ashish Mehta for applicant in C.A. Mr.S.N.Patil, AGP for respondent No.1. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & R.M.SAVANT,JJ. DATE :- OCTOBER 22, 2010 P.C. Heard. Perused petition. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of the present petition, the Reference under Section 18 has also been filed by the petitioner and the same is pending for adjudication. In this view of the matter, it is not necessary for us to go into the merits of the question sought to be raised in this petition, which can always be raised in the proceeding under Section 18. With these observations, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such with liberty to raise all the contentions raised in the petition, in the proceeding under Section 18. No order as to costs. 3. In view of the withdrawal of the petition, Civil Application does not survive. Hence, the same stands dismissed. (R.M.SAVANT,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)