IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.: 6059 of 2010 alongwith CWP Nos.6060, 6061, 6062, 6063, 6064, 6065, 6066, 6067 and 6068 of 2010. Decided on: 01.10.2010. __________________________________________________________ 1. CWP No.6059 of 2010. Jai Dass. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. 2. CWP No.6060 of 2010. Dola Singh. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. 3. CWP No.6061 of 2010. Giri Raj. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. 4. CWP No.6062 of 2010. Dabe Ram … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. 5. CWP No.6063 of 2010. Fateh Chand. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. 6. CWP No.6064 of 2010. Tek Ram. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. - 2 - 7. CWP No.6065 of 2010. Hira Chand. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. 8. CWP No.6066 of 2010. Ram Singh. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. 9. CWP No.6067 of 2010. Ved Ram. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. 10. CWP No.6068 of 2010. Dile Ram. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Advocate (in all the petitions). For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General (in all the petitions). Justice Kurian Joseph, C. J. (Oral): Petitioners claim conferment of work-charge status. Reliance is placed on the judgment rendered by this Court in Rakesh Kumar versus State of H.P. and others, CWP No.2735 of 2010 decided on 28th July, 2010. The petitioners may file appropriate - 3 - representations furnishing therein their service particulars before the second respondent, in which case the second respondent will take appropriate action adverting to the submissions made in the representations, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the representations alongwith copy of this judgment and copy of the judgment referred to above. 2. With the above observations, the petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 01, 2010. (sck/awasthi).