IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16099 of 2011 NAVEEN KUMAR RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 23.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that Harinarain Rao, Bhola Patel and Kailash Patel persuaded the complainant to sell the land for which Rs. 6,00,000/- was taken from the complainant. Subsequently, the complainant came to know that by impersonation Harinarain executed the sale deed. It is alleged against the petitioner that he received the cash amount. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is nothing on record to suggest that petitioner received the cash amount and the sale deed was not executed by him. Moreover, the main accused Harinarain has 2 been granted anticipatory bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 17312 of 2010 by this Court. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Trial No. 1760 of 2010 arising out of Complaint Case No. 1262C of 2008, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)