IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 19245 of 2000 Between: Rajiv Fruit Vegetable Processing and Preservation Industrial Co- Operative Society, Rep. by its President N.Srinivasa Rao, S/o Kanta Rao, 8-44, RCM Church Road, Wyra, Khammam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 A.P.Khadi & Village Industries Board, Rep. by its Development Officer, Khammam. 2 A.P.Khadi & Village Industries Board, Rep. by its Chief ExecutiveOfficer, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction and more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus i) declaring the action of the respondent authorities in initiating provision under the A.P.Revenue Recovery Act by issuing the impugned notice in DO/KMM/Rajiv Society/Recovery/88.89 dt 5.9.2000 as arbitrary, illegal, violative of Art 14 & 21 of Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the A.P.Revenue Recovery Act; ii) to set aside the seizure notice in DO/KMM/Rajiv Society/Recovery/88.89 dt 5.9.2000; and to pass such other or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.SUDERSHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MS.N.NAGAVANI PRASUNA The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: There being no representation on 17-4-2009, the writ petition was directed to be listed for dismissal on 23-4-2009. The writ petition has appeared under dismissal caption today and when called there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs. ________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 5th June, 2009. GRR