c^ IN THE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.} W.F. (S) N0.~ '^ ' /2009 fc PETITIONER: ^ .-•"V ^y^ ^^y y .-•w^y i9'' -fr'-O^.--"' ^y ^- ^' VERSUS RESFQNDENTS: (1) C.G. Patle, S/o Shri S.R. Patle, Aged about 61 years, R/o Village Darima, Post Darima, TahsU - Ainbikapur, District - Sarguja, (C.G.), Presently appointed as Higher Secondaiy School, Daiima, Sarguja (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Development Depaitment D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ,.,,»>^'"l"ri;«! (2) CoUector, Dista-ict Sarguja ^" (3) Assistant Cpmmissioner, Tribal Development Department, District- Saiguja (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF WDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- JS^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETmON CS) No. 6424 of2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS C.G. Patie. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Othsrs. Amit PETmON LTNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE'CONSTFrUTIQN OF DSTDIA SB: HonlbleShn Satish K. AjsEnihptn, J^ Present: Shri Mateen Siddique, Advocate tor the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Govemment Advocate forthe State. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 09th day of November,2009) With fhe consent of leamed counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is heard finally. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that despite the order dated 30 June, 2009 (Annexure P/l), the petitioner, woi-king as Senior Principal at Boys Higher Secondary School, Darima, District Surguja, has been transferred to Lakhanpur, as Block Education Offieer. However, the petitioner has not yet been relieved tojointhe new place bf posting. Shri Siddique submits that once the order of transfer has been passed, it is for the govemment to ensure that itis complied witli immediately. He relies on a deeision of the Supreme Court ia Sreedansr.Chandra Ghosh v. State of Assam & others^, in support of his contention that if the order is not complied with, a direction can be issued for enforcement thereof. Shri Bhatia, leamed Deputy Govemment Advooate appearing for the State/respondents, as usual prays for.time to seskinstructions. I am unable to understand asto what instructions he needs ifthere is an order on record. If l&e aforesaid transfer-order is still in sxistence, the govemment is under an obligation to comply with the same at once. It is accordingly directed that the transfer order shall be complied with forthwith within a period oftwo weeks. 4. Accordingly, thispetition is disposedof. | Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 2. 3. ^^ ' (1996) 10 SGG 567 ^