IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2010 / 15TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 35865 of 2009(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- 1. RATHEESH, AGED 33 YEARS, S/O.KUNHIMON, MUTHALI HOUSE, KANNIYAMBAL, KUNNAMKULAM, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR. 2. A.K.GANGADHARAN, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.KUTTAN, AYINAPULLY HOUSE, PALACE ROAD, KUNNAMKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT SRI.RANJIT BABU SRI.LOWEL CHERIAN SMT.K.R.REMYA (KARUKAYIL) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNNAMKULAM POLICE STATION, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR. 2. JAMES, S/O.MATHU, THOLATHU HOUSE, ANDITHODE AMSOM, PORKULAM VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. SUMA, W/O.JAMES, THOLATHU HOUSE, ANDITHODE AMSOM, PORKULAM VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. JOSE, S/O.MATHU, THOLATHU HOUSE, MOSKO ROAD, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. SR.GOVT.PLEADER SHRI.LAKSHMI NARAYAN FOR R1 ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) FOR R2 TO 4 SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) FOR R2 TO 4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 35865 of 2009(C) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT IN FAVOUR OF THE FIRST PETITIONER EVIDENCING THE LEASE ARRANGEMENTS. P2: COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT IN FAVOUR OF THE 2ND PETITIONER EVIDENCING THE LEASE ARRANGEMENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: ( TRUE COPY ) PA TO JUDGE. kvs/- P.R.RAMAN & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.35865 of 2009-C. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 5th day of January, 2010. J U D G M E N T Raman, J. Alleging police harassment, this writ petition was filed. According to the petitioners, they are tenants occupying the building, which belonged to the party respondents. The party respondents at the instance of the first respondent insisted the petitioners to vacate the premises. The learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the Sub Inspector of Police submits that actually the building belonged to the party respondents and the petitioners effected certain maintenance and were paying the rent. If the party respondents have got any grievance, they can move either before the Rent Control Court or before the Civil Court. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this WP(C).No.35865/2009. -: 2 :- is purely a civil matter and no interference is called for. The writ petition is, therefore, closed. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE . P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE. Kvs/-