Versus Respondents 1. (q IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHNIIQ§QI§§§1MLV§§VLA§£WQ§ Wn‘t Peu'tion (C) No. 4054 of 2007 Petitioner Smt. Kamla Devi Ag1awal, W/o Dayakishan Agrawal, aged about 6O years, R/o Kesharpara, Raigarh, represented through her husband Dayakishan Agrawal, S/o Mangat Rai Agrawal, a power of attorney holder for and on behalf of petitioner Kamla Devi Agrawal. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Urban Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur. Municipal Corporation Raigarh, through the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raigaxh (C.G.) The Collector, Raigarh (C.G.). (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri Ashok Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. and 3. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the respondents No. 1 Shri H. B. Agarwai, Senior Advocate with Ms Rinky Tamrakar, Advocate for the respondent No.2. Thakur ORDER ( Passed on this 20th Day of January, 2009 ) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty that the petitioner may be permitted to take recourse to the jurisdictional competent Court for determination of damages and consequential payment of compensation, if the action of the respondent] Corporation is found illegal. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection. In View of the foregoing, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above—stated liberty, if so advised. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 3.