IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 21ST JULY 2008 / 30TH ASHADHA 1930 W.P(C).No. 13818 of 2008(T) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- JIJO J.EDATTUKARAN, EDATTUKARAN HOUSE, ELOOR VILLAGE, MANJUMMEL P.O, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANU RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ELOOR VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. I.V. PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 13818 OF 2008 - T = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 21st day of July 2008 J U D G M E N T An application made by the petitioner for the issue of a nativity certificate has been rejected by the 2nd respondent, by Ext. P5 order. A reading of Ext. P5 shows that all that is stated is that it is not possible to issue a certificate. Since no reason is stated in Ext. P5 for rejecting the application, I am inclined to quash the same and direct that the matter should be reconsidered and fresh orders be passed with reasons. Accordingly, in order to enable the 2nd respondent to reconsider the matter and pass a reasoned order I quash Ext. P5 and direct that the 2nd respondent shall reconsider the application made by the petitioner and pass fresh orders. 2. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-