xa. d.y u IN THE HIGH WUR‘I‘ OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHA‘I‘TISGARH) n“. u. J ‘ x 1. , KT , . , . ~1 ) I; ,.wwwwWumygw.hn ‘ wan PETITION No.\ 05‘ 2000 BETWEEN J.N.Divya. 3/0 shrl Panchramr Divya, aged about 41 years. of£icer, Bilaspuu: Raipur Kshetriya Gramin Bank..B_ranch Khamhi. District Bilaspur. residing at Tekha Road, Bhatapara. Gurunanak Watd. District Raipgr (Chhattisgarh) PETI TIGNER‘ Bilaspur Eaipur Kshetriya Gramin Banki Through its Chairman. Head 0££ice Dayalbandh. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) . Chairman, Bilaspur Raipur Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Head Office Dayalbandh, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). The Enquiry o££icer ( shri J. Rasahu); Branch Manager ,. Bilaspur Raipur KShetriya Gramin Bank. Limtara Bilaspur District Bilaspux(cm1attisgarh)..’ HE? IT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF TEE CONSTITUTION \ OF INDIA REspoNDENTs . ‘ the record the pehtloner had moved an application to call a Hand 1mination‘ of signatures and thumb iesses This application was rejected 31d rejection the petitioner came up thls Wnt pehtion 1n which an Iratem/ 000 staymg further proceedings before Wnnng Expert for the ex 1mpress1ons of vanous Witt Bemg aggneved Wlth the s‘ before th1s (301111 by way of order was passed on 17 11 2 the Enquny oilicer Return has been mec' subsequent to the nling of th petitioner to call a i Hand s1gnatures and thumb expres grievance w1th Whlch the pen surv1ves. In thls v1ew of thl served in keeping the writ pet' at this stage, in View of the because the/grievance of the p: of the M.\A‘I.P.Ng. 155/2001, stand d ’ In View /\ [ on behalf of the respondents that e Writ petition they have permitted the, Writing Expert for examination of s10ns which are 1n dlspute Thus the ioner approached this Court no longer matter no useful purpose would be Ition pending, as it [can be disposed of return nled by the respondents and ‘etitioner does not survive. matter 7 sposed of \d/\‘‘ w P No 15/2000 & N RC’Nalk Judge i above 7 ZawT‘ “ H X‘31q(1—22, V L _ L 3a W, m W \ aila$i m mm \t / W 299 ‘ .. ...... A ............. a.. * _ ., i . ' mmaz‘vfaa @WJ q Zi?#@‘§%uf11u1g( $ W mar 06-8-2002? r Shrj Deepak Jain, coulsel for thc petitioner. Shri Awadh Tn'pathj, counscl for thé respondents. Heard. During the course of enquiry proceedig’fgs; as appears from