1901appln1507.10.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1507 OF 2010. Sandeepkumar Vijaykumar Gattani ..vs.. The State of Mah. and ors. ............................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ............................................................................................................................................................... Mr.Rahul Gughe, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.C.N.Adgokar, A.P.P. for respondent no.1. Mr.M.G.Sarda Adv. for the respondent no.2. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATED : 19 th January, 2011. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This court by order dated 16/12/2010 observed that the learned Magistrate directed the applicant to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.1000/- per month. The said order was passed on 8th April, 2010. Though the applicant is practicing Advocate, still he has not made payment pursuant to the order dated 8th April, 2010. He has also not challenged the order. Since the applicant has not complied that order, even the bailable warrant was issued against the applicant. This court further observed that the court is of the opinion that the present application should not be entertained unless the applicant first complies the order dated 8th April, 2010 and makes a statement to that effect on affidavit. A request was made subsequently on 5/1/2011 when the matter was placed before this court by the learned Advocate for the applicant for grant of two weeks as a last 1901appln1507.10.odt 2 chance to make the statement in view of order dated 16/12/2010. At the request of learned Advocate the time was granted. Learned Advocate Mr.Ghuge for the applicant today expressed his inability to make any statement as he has not received any instructions from the applicant. It seems that the applicant is willfully avoiding the payment of the amount as directed by the court. It also further reveals that though an opportunity was given by this court vide order dated 16/12/2010 to the applicant to show his bona fides by depositing the amount, the amount is not deposited till this date in spite of grant of sufficient time and extension to the applicant. In view of this fact, I am of the opinion that the applicant deserves no indulgence at the hands of this court. The application as such is rejected. JUDGE chute