* 1 * FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2584 OF 2009 (FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) [ Ashok Bhavarlal Jain V/S. Indumati S.Pilly & anr. ] Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s order or Court’s or Judge’s orders directions and Registrar orders Mr.Abhaykumar Apte, adv.for applicant. Mr.J.P.Kharge, APP for respondents. CORAM: SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED: 4TH AUGUST, 2009. P.C. : 1. Heard counsel for both sides. 2. This Revision Application is filed to challenge the judgment of acquittal dated 31st December, 2008 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pimpari, Pune in Criminal Case No.668 of 2007 filed under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act. The acquittal was on the ground that there was no legally enforceable debt. 3. It was the case of the applicant that he had * 2 * given a hand loan of Rs.75,000/- to respondent no.1 in return of which she had issued the cheque in question. The defence of respondent no.1 was of total denial. She denied the claim of hand loan as well as issuance of the cheque. Respondent no.1 examined herself and deposed that she had never taken hand loan of Rs.75,000/- from the applicant, though she candidly admitted that earlier she had taken loan of diverse amounts from the applicant, but however, repaid the same. 4. I have carefully gone through the judgment of the trial court. It extensively deals with the evidence laid down by the parties. In my opinion, there is no error or illegality in the impugned order. The same is a possible view of the matter. Hence, the application for leave to appeal is rejected. In view of rejection of the leave to appeal, Criminal Appeal also stands rejected. [JUDGE]