IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9154 OF 2009 Amrut Jagu Patil deceased through his heirs & Lrs Vijay Amrut Patil & Ors. ..... ..... ...Petitioners V/s Rameshwar Haribhau Patil & Anr. ..... ..... .Respondents. Mr.S.K.Shinde, Adv. for the petitioners. APP for the Respondents. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 30th November, 2009. PC: A concurrent finding has been recorded by the First Appellate Court and the trial Court that the plaintiff has made out prima facie good case and thus granted temporary injunction. The present petitioners are the defendants who have been restrained from alienating the suit property pending decision of the suit. On own showing of the present petitioner he along with three others had purchased the suit property under registered sale deed way back in the year 1956 and thus according to the petitioner himself he has 1/4th share in the suit property. The plaintiffs are claiming remaining 3/4th share. The present petitioner contended that the plaintiffs/respondents are not the persons along with whom the property was purchased by the petitioner. Both the courts below on appreciation of the evidence and material on record have reached prima facie conclusion that the plaintiffs are same persons who purchased the suit property along with the present petitioners and thus granted temporary injunction as prayed for. Perused the impugned orders. Same do not call for any interference as possible view of the matter has been taken. In the result writ petition stands summarily dismissed.