INTHEHON!BLEHIGHCQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER '^b^t0 RESPONDENTS [Contemnors] Shri SHASHIDHAR PANDA, S/o Shri Loknath Panda, aged about 58 years, Ad-hoc Upper Division Teacher, Govt. h^igher Secondary School, Mahapalli, District-Raigah (C.G.), (presently discontinued) R/o village-Belariya, Post-Banora, District-Raigarh (C.G.) VERStJS 1) . Shri M.K. RAUT, Secretary, Department of School Education, State of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District-Raipur(C.G.) 2) Shri K.R. PISDA, Director, Lok- Shikshan, Lok-Shikshan Sanchalanalaya, behind Board of Secondary Education Office, Pension Bada, Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) CpNTBMFT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES-215 OF THE CONSTIT^JTION QF INDIA READ-WITH SECTION- 12 OF THE GONTEMPTS OF COURT ACT, 1971ARISING-OUT OF ORDER DATED 13-01-2011'PASSSEDBY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WRIT PETITION N0.1999/2006 ./- *ii*i<ni tb*ira» 'S^ ^nw^, ®Til<-<<ie,fs|<?liy^< .(^^:..<^^Ic^.^w]ys\\ ^ -200- sfl^s ^SI R'li* '(Ten'^nt?i ^liN^ s ': Tumane sn^i 1raq? (^[^^j 'RdIW ^liTO 311^1 SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Moh 05-12-2011 Shri Neeraj Pradhan, oouns Heard. Learned counsel for the pe' was issued bythis Court on 13-01 for oonsideration of the oase of for the petitioner. Itioner submits that though a direction ^2011 inWrit Petition No. 1999 of 2006 |ie petitioner, in accordance with the directions given by the Court, with|i a period of six weeks from the date of reoeipt of copy of this order, ttl after expiry of the stipulated periodl After going through the p< Submitted representation to the view of the order of the Court, di| the case of the petitioner, the pe| representation directly to the Seor^' tn that view of the matter, Dirwtor at present. The petitioner| Government, as directed earlier under obligation to take decision as per order dated 13-01-2011 pa< With the aforesajd observa1|ii Certified copy be supplied ^ 'ni«itci«II'lllfcil'if'fs^t <?<(<;!< iraflwan^r n Shrivastava. J. deoision has not been taken, even •tition, 1 find that the petitioner has Director to comply with the order. Though, a copy of the same has tjieen sent to the State Gsvemment, in ecting State Govemment to consider ituner ought to have been preferred tary ofthe concerned Department. am not inolined to 1ssue notioe to the ^nay prefer representation to the State and the State govemment shall be the matter within the time stipulated ssed in Writ Petition No. 1999 of 2006. ion, the petition stands disposed off. /ithin three days. Sd/- , Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ifra^hl ^••S^gs?TOiIT, WRWTra—i'S/i40—2/2011—1,50,000. .f^ Ssi^^:...