IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI MONDAY, THE 30TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(Crl.).No. 381 of 2009(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- K.N.SATYARAJAN, S/O. K.A.NARAYANAN, AGED 43, KODUNGUKUDY HOUSE, MUTHANGA POST, WYNAD FATHER OF PARISHA K.S., 2ND YEAR BA STUDENT, NSS COLLEGE FOR WOMEN, KARAMANA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.VINOD VALLIKAPPAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE SECRETARY HOME MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SULTANS BATTERY POLICE STATION, WAYNAD. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE WAYNAD DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, FORT POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. THE PRINCIPAL, NSS COLLEGE FOR WOMEN, KARAMANA, NERAMANKARA, POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 7. R.RAKHIL RAJ, S/O. PADMINI DEVI, KADUKKARA PANAYIL VEEDU, SREEVARAHAM, VALLKADAVU POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 8. PRAMOD, EMPLOYEE OF SOUTHERSN RAILWAY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM WITH HIS MOBILE NUMBER 9388819494 ADDRESS IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. 9. PADMINI DEVI,M/O. R. RAKHIL RAJ KADUKKARA PANAYIL VEEDU, SREEVARAHAM, VALLAKADAVU POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.SMITHA SUKUMAR FOR R1 TO R5 ADV. SRI.G.SUDHEER, FOR R7,8 & 9 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(Crl.)No.381 OF 2009 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 30th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2009 J U D G M E N T Basant, J. This judgment must be read in continuation of our earlier orders resting with the order dated 12.11.2009. 2. Today when the case is called, the 7th respondent is present. He has produced before Court, certificate dated 25.11.2009, issued by the Marriage Officer, Thiruvananthapuram, which shows that his marriage with the alleged detenue has taken place in accordance with the provisions of the Special Marriage Act on 25.11.2009. The certificate is placed before us for our perusal. 3. The petitioner now accepts that the alleged detenue has got married with the 7th respondent and that there is no element of illegal detention or confinement involved. 4. In these circumstances, we accept the certificate produced. This Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as agreed. A copy of the certificate has been furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner who accepts the same. R.BASANT, JUDGE. M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE. dsn