IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.4411 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.4411 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.4411 OF 2008 1.Amir Mohd.Khalil Shaikh 2.Abdul Saeed Mohd.Khalil Shaikh .. Applicants. Vs State of Maharashtra, .. Respondent. Mr.V.S.Vanjara with M.A.Shaikh for the applicants. Mr Y.S.Shinde, APP for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATED : 10TH DECEMBER, 2008. DATED : 10TH DECEMBER, 2008. DATED : 10TH DECEMBER, 2008. PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking bail in C.R.No.I-203 of 2007 of Thane Gramin Wada police station, Dist-Thane. The said crime has been registered against the applicants and seven others for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 395 and 342 of IPC. 3. The applicants and the co-accused allegedly committed dacoity at the factory of the complainant and robbed articles/scrap material having their company’s logo worth Rs.21 lacs. While committing the offence all the accused allegedly used knives. During investigation, the prosecution conducted a test identification parade in which admittedly the applicants were not identified as one of the persons who committed the dacoity. There is no recovery at the instance of the applicants. Learned APP could not point out any material against the applicants to connect them with the alleged offence. In the circumstances, I am inclined to enlarge them on bail. Hence, the following order. . The applicants to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each with one or two sureties to make up the said amount, subject to condition that the applicants shall report to the concerned police station on every Wednesday and Saturday between 7 and 8 pm for a period of three months and thereafter on every Saturday till conclusion of the trial. . While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case without being influenced by the observations made in this order. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)