IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 51 of 1996 Between: 1. The Women’s Cooperative Housing Society Ltd with Head Office at Barkatpura, rep. by its Secretary Smt. Radhabayamma. 2. Sri P.Srikant Reddy, S/o.Justice P.C.Reddy, r/o.Banjarahilla, Road No.2, Owner of Plot Nos.98 and 99. 3. Smt. N.Nagamani, W/o.N.V.R.Seshagiri Rao, r/o.Ramlote, Hyderabad, Owner of Plot No.83. 4. Smt. Shaila Natwa, W/o.Ashok Natwa, rep. by GPA A.Venkata Ramana, C/o.Plot No.93, Road No.5, Women’s Coop. Housing Society, Jubilee Hills, Owner of Plot No.94. 5. B.Avadamma, W/o.B.Subba Naidu, rep. by B.S.Srinivasan GPA at Plot No.93, Road No.5, Women’s Coop. Housing Society, Jubilee Hills, Owner of Plot No.103. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1. S.Yadaiah, S/o.S.Sayanna. 2. S.Shankaramma, W/o.S.Sayanna, both residing at H.No.8-3-333, Yellareddyguda, Hyderabad. 3. The District Collector, Hyderabad. 4. The Commissioner of Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ preferably in the nature of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and declaring the action in entertaining the application in LCC No.268/95 and I.A. unnumber of 1995 is absolutely without jurisdiction and illegal and further direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners’ construction on their plots with lawful permission. Counsel for Petitioner No.2: MR. N.MOHAN KRISHNA Counsel for Petitioners 1 & 3 to 5: None appeared Counsel for Respondents 1 and 2: SMT.A.ANASUYA Counsel for Respondent No.3: GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR REVENUE Counsel for Respondent No.4: STANDING COUNSEL FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF HYDERABAD The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri N.Mohan Krishna, learned Counsel for the second petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Placing the said submission on record, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J Dated: 06th December, 2004. Ak ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner, Municipal Coproration of Hyderabad, Hyderabad. 3. Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (O.U.T). 4. Two CD copies.