Writ Petition No. 107 of 205 0 Maturam Agrawai, S. Shri Laxmi Narayan Agrawal, aged bout 4 years, R/o. Gandhi Gan], Raigarh, District Raigarh, (CG). Versus Muicipal Corporatin hrough Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raigarh (CG). (Writ Petition nder Articie 226/227 of Constitution of india u ) SB: Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Ashok Soni, counsel forthe petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, counsel for the respondent. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 26‘“ day of September, 2008) The petitioner challenges legality and validity of the order dated 23¥1 1- 2004 passed in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 16/2004 against the demand notice dated 4-10-2004 passed by the first respondent. 2) The District Judge, after having heard learned counsel for'the parties, v, came to the conclusion that the order dated 3-9—2004 was not in accordance with law. Thus, the said order was quashed and the matter was remanded to the first respondent to consider the case afresh and pass appropriate order. After remand, the first respondent has considered the case and passed an order on 29-4-2005 (Annexdre R/3). 3) The petitioner, instead of challenging the order dated 24-9-2005 (Annexure R/3) passed by the first respondent, continued with this petition. Thus, this petition has become infructuous as the order passed by the District \e; a Judge has already been given effect to and complied with. Fresh ‘t‘na. \ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Petitioner /o a 7 Respondent n o t consideration has taken place and the order has been passed thereon. Thus, this petition has become infructuous. 4) On the request of learned counsei for the petitioner, it is open to‘the petitioner to impugn the subsequent order, if so advised, before appropriate statutory forum that may be available to him under the provisions of law, if so advised. ,5) ln view of the foregoing, this petition stands disposed of. Sdl- lSatish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge