IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.2749 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 28, 2010 Rajesh Kumar Petitioner Versus The Himachal Road Transport Corporation Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr.Haresh Sood, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: (a) That the writ in the nature of certiorari may kindly be issued against the respondents by quashing and set aside verbal order of termination of service of the petitioner. (b) That a writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued directing the respondents to re-engage the petitioner on the post of TMOPA on which post the petitioner was already working with all consequential benefits; or in the alternative the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the case of the petitioner for re- engaging the petitioner on the post of TMPA. 2 2. Since the petitioner has represented as per Annexure P- 6 representation, we do not propose to deal with the merits of the contentions. The writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent to look into Annexure P-6 representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law and justice within a period of six weeks from the date of production of the copy of this judgment alongwith the copy of the writ petition. In case petitioner requests for an opportunity of hearing, the same shall also be granted. 3. The writ petition is disposed of so also the pending applications. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. May 28th, 2010 (PK)