IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1331/2008 Mangesh Warthi..vs.. State =================================== CORAM: S.R. DONGAONKAR, J. DATE:6.5.2008 Heard Mr. Ansari Advocate for applicant and Mr. Parihar, A.P.P. for state. The applicant is claiming bail as he has been arrested for the offence u/s 306 r/w 34 of IPC in Crime No.28/2008 of P.S. Karanja. One Pratibha had committed suicide and she left suicide note. According to her she had committed suicide because of love affairs between the applicant and herself. Learned APP contended that last paragraph of said note which reads – that Mangesh and Nitesh they are the offenders, implicate the applicant. He also invites my attention towards the starting paragraph of said suicide note. Perusal of the same does not make out a case of abetment, ex-facie Learned A.P.P. has cited 2000 (10) SCC 337 State of Haryana ..vs.. Surinder Kumar to contend that such note may invite inference of abetment to commit suicide It is difficult to agree. However, leaving the matter to be decided at the time of trial, suffice it to say that in the circumstances of the case, applicant would be entitled for bail, however subject to conditions: Applicant be released on furnishing surety and PRB of Rs.25000/- subject to conditions that he shall not directly or indirectly tamper with prosecution evidence and shall attend the trial regularly. Application stands disposed. Bail in trial court. JUDGE smp.