IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 766 OF 2010 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF MORMUGAO ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. V. B. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. S. Malkarnenkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. A. Kamat, Additional Government Advocate for respondent nos.1 to 3. Coram:- MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date:- 11th April, 2011 P.C. By this petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner - Board of Trustees of the Port of Mormugao has prayed for direction to the State of Goa, the Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority and the Collector, South Goa to ensure that the reclamation illegally made by respondent no.4, which is Goa Fishing Boat Owners Association, is abated and the area restored to its original condition. 2. The learned Advocate General states that respondent no.2- the Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority has rightly issued show cause notice to respondent no.4 calling upon respondent no.4 to show cause why reclamation made by respondent no.4 and encroachments should not be removed and the area restored to its original condition. 3. The learned Advocate General states that the authority shall proceed with the matter and take appropriate decision in accordance with law within two months from today. 4. The petitioner has also prayed for direction to the State Government to grant the petitioner NOC for posting CISF personnel at the Khariwada fishing jetty. The learned Advocate General states that the above request will also be considered at the ensuing meeting between the State Government officers and the officers of the petitioner - Trust. 5. In view of the above statements, nothing further survives in the petition. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. SMA