INTHECOURTOFHON'Bl.EHIGMCOURTJ:)? CHMATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) WRITPETmONN0.3(.^.../2006 PETITIONER .^^•^. ^y'^-v'^^' ^wy^^-i" ...••-" RESPONDENTS / / Punau S/o Late Shri Chingru, Aged about 57 year working as Gangman Department ofP.W.D.R/o Bandhapali, Tah. Sarangarh Distt.Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Engineer-in-Chief, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 3. Superintending Engineer, PublicWorks Department, Bilaspur Division, Distt.Bilaspur(C.G.) 4. Executive Engineer, PublicWorks Department, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC. QRANYOTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICEINTHE MATTER XI-HC-22 75T ^qpTRT'T, d'dl'y'liB, Ts(c1l'yll< an^r^i ft;-<i.+ sn^T stili'b ^TfttT ^•y ">' < b'.' 5 006 an^T.ssira! ^ritcT 0-A-, ^hri Sameer Beh.ar, coun^ Shri Satish Gupta,Dy. G( Application ror urgent hea|! ;el for the petffi M. Adv. for the Irina is ailowed. The petitioner has fiied Constitution of India on the .service, hfe services have not Counsel for the petition Gangman since'more than 25 submits that the petitioner is e^ Seroice Ruies, 1995 Annexure 2003 and Annexure P-4 dated as per Annexure P-6 were ma\ also pointed out that some relied on a decision of Hon'bli ihyrkynda_C9lJierv of per^ons Ife Celn Bhurkunda t/s. Cei i9and Learned State counsel pc| itioner is pending and th^ Having considered and t( sBme the case, in the op.inion of this| served if a direction is given to afresh raising his grievances b^fore' along with a copy of the petitioi^ and on such representation respondents shall decide the s^me as early as possibie prsferably) production of the representatio4 the petitioner may avail the With the aforesaid ob; Counsei submits that phi^i Certified copy asper rule| rem^dy wifepftt in*i^f ti fe^t.'rfsRZH '^SlPtTO 311^1 this petition under Articies 226/227 of the jound that even after completing 25 years of regufarized. submits that fhe petitioner is sen/ing as j/ears. He has fited copy of Service Book. He !ied to be regularized under the Gangmen's P-2 and Circuiars Annexure P-3 dated 9-4- P-9-2002. Itis pointed out that representations j3e coilectiveiy and the. same is pending. It is have been regularized. Leamed counse! Apex CoUrt in the case of The orkmen of itral Coainelds/Lta'. -v- The Manaaement of tra! Coaffieds Ltd. reported in 2006A1R_SCW £7ofthe above decision. jinted out thatthe representation submitted by Isame wiil be considered and decided. ^ithout expressing any opinion on the merits of Court, for the present, ends of justice wiii be (he. petitioner to make a detailed representation the respondent no. 2 - Engineer-in-Chief and this order, within three weete from today, fbeing fited, the competent authority of the on jts own merits in accordance wfth law v/ithin three months from the date of receipt' It is made clear that if any grievance remains, i, availabie under the taw. >, this petition stands disposed of. |tocopyofthe order maybe supp'ied'to them. ^. Photocopy of order may aiso be suppiied. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge