IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY FRIDAY, THE 8TH JULY 2011 / 17TH ASHADHA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 2051 of 2011() ------------------------------------ CRIME NO.315/2011 OF NADAKKAVU POLICE STATION. .................... PETITIONERS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT ---------------------------------------------------------- SHEENA PAUL, D/O.GOD FRED,"SHEREENA" P.O. CHEVAYUR, NELLIKKODE AMSOM, KOVOOR DESOM, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE ------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NADAKKAVU POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE-673 011. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NADAKKAVU POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE-673 011. 3. CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER, KOZHIKODE-673 001. 4. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-31. R1 TO R5 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.JAIBY PAUL. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs Crl.MC.No. 2051 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A: COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.315/2011 OF NADAKKAVU POLICE STATION DATED 16/05/2011. ANNEXURE A-1: COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF ANNEXURE A. ANNEXURE B: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE NADAKKAVU POLICE STATION. ANNEXURE B-1: COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF ANNEXURE B. ANNEXURE C: COPY OF THE DETAILS OF EXAMINATION CONDUCTED BY THE DOCTORS DATED 25/05/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs B.P. RAY, J. ........................................... CRL.M.C.NO.2051 OF 2011 ............................................. Dated this the 8th day of July, 2011. O R D E R The petitioner is the defacto complainant in Crime No.315/2011 of the Nadakkavu police station for the offences punishable under Sections 354 and 377 of IPC, which is now pending in the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-IV, Kozhikode. The petitioner being dissatisfied with the investigation conducted by respondent No.1, has filed this petition to transfer the investigation to some other officer. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. The learned Public Prosecutor states that respondent No.3- the City Police Commissioner be directed to entrust the matter to an officer of the rank of Dy.S.P or above the rank to supervise the case. 3. If the petitioner makes an application before the Commissioner of Police, Kozhikode highlighting her grievances, then the Commissioner of Police shall appoint an officer of the rank of Dy.S.P or above the rank to supervise the case. The Crl.M.C is disposed of as above. Sd/= B.P. RAY, JUDGE. cl /true copy/ P.S. to Judge