- 1 - rng IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.387 OF 2010 in CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1121 OF 2006 Sanjay Madhukar Satam ... Applicant vs The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.Arfan Sait Advocate appointed for Applicant Mr.J.P.Yagnik A.P.P.for Respondent ... CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ DATE: 8th April , 2010 P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Arfan Sait the learned appointed Advocate for the applicant who prays for being released on bail during the pendency of his Criminal Appeal No.1121 of 2006. The application has been sent directly from jail. 2. The deceased is the mother of the applicant and was found dead by her husband in the morning of 21st - 2 - January, 2005. The dead body was decomposed. As per the prosecution case, the applicant was last seen on 18th January, 2005. The applicant was staying with his mother and the prosecution case is based on circumstantial evidence. After we have heard Mr.Sait and perused the reasonings set out in the order of conviction, we do not find a case to suspend the order of sentence and release the applicant on bail during the pendency of this Appeal. The Paper Book in Criminal Appeal No.1121 of 2006 is ready and therefore hearing in the said appeal could be expedited. 3. Hence, this application is rejected and Criminal Appeal No.1121 of 2006 is expedited. 4. A copy of this order be forwarded by the Registry to the concerned jail where the applicant is presently lodged. MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J B.H.MARLAPALLE,J - 3 -