IGH $§§ ' WP. (S) m. 1204 cf 2005 Petitioner Ram Ashish Chand, S/o. Late $hri Laxmi Chand, aged about 59 years. Rlo. Ashish Bhawan Brindavan Coiony. Jagdalpur. Chhattisgarh Versus Respondents 1. District Co-operative Central Bank Maryadit, through its Chairman. District Co- operative Central Bank Maryadit, Jagdalpur. (C.G.) 2. Chief Executive Officer. District (So-operative Central Bank Maryadit. Jagdalpur. (C.G.) WRIT PETlIQlN UNDER ARTWW 2% READ WlTl-l ARTICL£ 227 OF THE ccus‘rrrunen m: INDIA Single Bench : Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri P. S. Koshy. Advocate with Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate fer the petitioner. Shri Prafuil Bharat, Advocate for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 26th day of February, 2008) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that without taking any steps on the departmental enquiry held in respect of the charge sheet dated 21.6.2005 (Annexure P/1) and consequent order thereupon, the respondenm have initiated third enquiry on the same issue. without revocation ot the suspension order. 2. Shri Prafutl Bharat. learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that all the steps would be taken to conclude the enquiry and pass appropriate order expeditiously. With regard to the revocation of suspension, if a representation H i¥¥F€3F CHHATTISGARH A BILASPU is made by the petitioner to the concerned authon‘ty, the same shail be considered and decided in'accordance with law, as expeditiousiy as possible. {n View of the fcregcing. according to ieamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this matter. The petition stands disposed’oi.‘ / i egnmwi Judge Thakur / Satish ‘