i%^'-^%^^^^ '^'i^w^is3 "f[MK(:S!i^^Si^^ Si^'SBRIIBB^B 'KK^S.SSiSK ^.&j*i€l:B Wff^ v w T8 1EE HIQH c-F^ OF CSBaTEISS&EH AT BIIASPBS Vrit ^etition So. 89_S/2001 ^!^^ jir PETITIGBEES ...^ •^' l^.-''^" A'S^-'- :^ ^'; ^y <?<t''.a»' &»*' •^* 6 ^^ ^^' ^y 1) Smt. Gaagiabai, aged 36 yrs., W/o Bemu, Gond, Sarpaach, Qraa Panehasrab, Boda, P.0. Fas-fcerpur, P.S. Eunaa., B.I. Circle end Tehsil ttaigeli, Bistriet -Bilaspur. 2) Eedar Yadav, aged 35 yrs., S/o Sav?ant Yadav, Farmer, B/o 'Village Par&swada, P.0. Pasterpur; P.S. Etmda, B.I. Circle gad Tehsil Kungell, District Bilaspur. ?SE S U S HSSPQUDEETSS ffA/ /^i'zfc iTT"? "17»T/'F?'?"?^ 1 1) St&te of ChhattisgaJ'h, . Ihrougli Sie Collector, Bilaspur. 2) "Sie Additional CollectiOr, Bllaspur. 3) 'Qie Tehsildar, laingeli, Distri.ct Bilaspur. 4) The Maa.b Tehsildar, Eungeli, Dis'fcrict Bllaspur. 5) Hirwa, S/o Purashottam, Sotwar, . 'Village Paraswaaa) P.o. Fasterpur, P.S. Eaada; Tehsil lirungell; Dxstrict Bil&s-pur. */S) Surendra, S/o Hirwa, 7) Aarti, I/o Hakul Ho. S iS: 7 both C/o Hirwa, Kotv»ar; Villsge P&raswada, p.0. 5'asteipur, P.S. Ecmda, Tehsil Is&ingeli, District BilaspQr. WSIT PETITIOM TJSDEa. &KTICLE 226/227 OF THS COI'TSTITUTia'T OF nn3i.fi. Xi-HC-22 ^a, ^FTii-ra, ^TJI-y're, 'wrray W.p.No.893/20 5r; ^i i c» fn tn-q^ff -q fs^- <M^R ^3:rf:fltI3|T^ 03-.3-2001 /Rao/ Shri Utkarsh Verma, coubsel for the petitioners. Dr.N.K.Shukla, learned beauty Advocate General for resDOndents No.l to 4 on adv^nce cooy. This oetition has been Eiled styling as public Interest Litigation contending that t|^e order passed by respondenta No.5 regarding allotment of grass]land in favour of respondents No.6 and 7 and the orders oassed ]|3y respondents No.2 & 4 for changin the pasture land as agricult|iiral land, are illegal Having cQnsidered the f case and materiai availabie be just and proper if a dlre acts and circumstances of the bn record, we think that it wou. btion is given to the oetitioners to mate a representation to |ihe Commissloner alongwith couies of documents anaexed therewlfch; and i£ such a reoresentation is raade alongwlth annexures in accordance with law as eaj'ly as possible oreferably aftej giving notice to the parties The oetitloners are also at aoplication for interlm reli accordance with law. ;he same shall be considered concerned. We direct accordingly, B.iberty to make a suitable ^f which will be considered in With the direction aforfesaid, the oetltion is disoosed of C.C. today, ----———-S-. Sd/. au"efJustice Sd/- FakJiruddin Judge -»'\