IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 4056 of 2008. Decided on: 30.08.2010. __________________________________________________________ Madan Lal. … Petitioner. Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondents : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): In sequel to order dated 26th July, 2010, the petitioner as well as his counsel have been served. Today, neither the petitioner is present in person nor he is represented by any counsel. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 30, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?