HIOfiCOURTQPCHHATnSGARHrBIiyUBPOTl Writ Petitfon (QNo, 6223 of2006 Petitioner Saajay Kuiiiar Agrawal, ayeA about 35 years, soa of Shri Decn Dayal Agrawal, Kharsaa, resident of Chandantal Road, Kharsia, Raigarh, Distfc Raigarh (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. Muaicipat CouncH Kharsia, throu^i Its Conuaissaoner, Khaisia, Distt. Raigarb (C.O.) 2. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (Writ Petition under Ardcle 226 oftfae Coastitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri Amit Sharma, Advocate for the petitwner. Shri B. D. Griu-u, Advocate for fhe respondent No. 1. Shri Arun Sao, Govt Advocate for the respondent No. 2. O RD B R (oratl (Passed on this 3rd July, 2009) Heard. 1. Leamed coimsel appearing for thc respondentNo.l/Muaicipal CouncU Kharsia, on instructions, submits fhat at present the laad in question is not Bequired for any purpose of the Coiuacil. In future, if the land ia question is reqiiired, fhe same shaB be ^. done ia accordaace wifh law, after affordiag proper opportuiuty ofhearing to the petitioaer. 2. In view oftfae above ctear aad unainbiguous subniission inade by leamed counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1, according to leanaed counsel appearmg for the petitioner, nothing sumves ia this writ petition for adjudication. 3. The petition is accordixigty, disposed of. No oider asto coste. llialau Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotti Judge