IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.5 OF 2009. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.5 OF 2009. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.5 OF 2009. IN IN IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2002 OF 1992. SUMMARY SUIT NO.2002 OF 1992. SUMMARY SUIT NO.2002 OF 1992. Union Bank of India ..Plaintiff versus Tosha Silk Industries & Anr. ..Defendants Mr.S.B.Gore for the plaintiffs Mr.Mehul Shah for the defendants CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 27th January, 2009. DATED : 27th January, 2009. DATED : 27th January, 2009. P.C. 1. Affidavit in reply taken on record. Heard learned Advocates on both the sides on the question of grant of permission to the plaintiff to lead secondary evidence. Perused the affidavit in support of the copy of the complaint addressed to L.T.Marg Police Station. Keeping in view the text of the affidavit in support, the plaintiffs can be granted permission to lead secondary evidence. Hence the Chamber Summons is required to be granted. Hence the Order. ORDER -2- . Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). . Plaintiffs to file evidence affidavit on 18.2.2009 directly in the Court and serve copy of the same upon the defendants one week in advance. . Adjoaurned to 18.2.2009 for recording of evidence. (R.Y.Ganoo, (R.Y.Ganoo, (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) J.) J.)