IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.: 3360 of 2011-D with CWP No. 3378 of 2011-D. Decided on: 21.11.2011. ___________________________________________ 1. CWP No.3360 of 2011-D. Des Raj. … Petitioner. Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. 2. CWP No.3378 of 2011-D. Mukesh. … Petitioner. Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): It is represented by Mr. M.L. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners that the present lis is covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP No.2973 of 2011 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - titled Dhananjay Saini Vrs. State of H.P. & ors., decided on 3rd June, 2011. He has also referred to Annexure P-1, dated 7th April, 2007. 2. Consequently, the present petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners in view of the principles laid down in the judgment cited hereinabove, read with Annexure P-1 dated 7th April, 2007, within a period of six weeks after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner(s). The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 21, 2011. (sck).