HEGH WURT OF CHHATTESGARH AT BILASP UR ‘v‘Jrit Petitiam (S) Na. 3972 9f 2308 EEiLiigVER Phool Sai Lakda, aged about 45 years, son of Shri Sukhamam, caste Uraon, working as Asstt. Teacher, Government Primary Schooi Kiriyan, Vikas Khand- Dharamjaigarh, Educaiion Disiric‘i-Raigarh (CG). VERSUS RESFONDEIVTS 2 i. State of Chhattisgarhe Through: The Secretaly, Bepamnem of School Education, Dan Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG). The Awaf Sachiv, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). 3. District Education Gfiieer—Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG). 4. Block Education Raigarh (CG). (WRKT PETiTiON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THb CGNSTKTUTEON OF INDIA) (SE: Hon7ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present : k) ()ffieer-Dharamjaigarh, Distt.‘ Shri AN. Bhakta, Acivocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S Thakur, Deputy Advocate Generai for the State. GRAL ORDER (Passed an this z4“‘ day ai'Jaiy, was) i. With the consent ofthe parties. the matter is taken up for hearing tinatly. 2. Learneti counset appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merit at this stage. However, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before the concerned authority within a petiod of three days and the same may be directed to be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within the . prescribed time. . Shri Thakur, learned counsel appearing for the State, submits that if the representation is made by the petitioner, the same shall be decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a pen'od oftwo weeks from the date ot‘receipt ofrepresentation. 4. Shri Thakur further submits that no coercive steps shah be taken, till the disposal ot‘the representation. 5. In View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sahu /