IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1862 of 2011 BIKAL JHA & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.02.2011. Perused the records. The petitioners being the husband and family members of the husband are apprehending their arrest. Initially the police case was registered when accusation was found false but subsequently on protest, cognizance has been taken under Sections 304B, 201/34 of the I.P.C. Considering the fact that accusation was found false during investigation and the learned Sessions Judge in the impugned order has doubted the cognizance under Section 304B of the I. P. C., let the petitioners, Bikal Jha, Santosh Jha @ Santosh Kumar Jha, Dhanesh Jha @ Dhanesh Kr. Jha, Anant Jha, Ambika Devi and Indira Devi be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Sursand P.S. Case No. 127 of 2007 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two - 2 - sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class(P), Sitamarhi, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)