IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.20 of 2010(O&M) Date of decision: 4.2.2010 Naresh Kundra ......Petitioner(s) Versus Meenu ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Daldeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhawalia, Advocate for the respondent. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) CM No.2548-CII of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CR No.20 of 2010 Parties are present. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order. It is not in dispute that net salary of the petitioner is Rs.57,968/- per month (gross salary) and the respondent-wife is earning Rs.36,377/-per month (gross salary). Keeping in view the totality of the circumstances, let the petitioner-husband continue to pay Rs.10,000/- per month as the maintenance pendente lite to the child. Disposed of. Office is directed to release a sum of Rs.11, 000/- deposited by the petitioner-husband, in pursuance of my order dated 7.1.2010, in favour of the respondent-wife granted towards litigation expenses. February 4, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE