^"•l!-a»,, ,....% ».•-••' Petitioner ResDondents HtGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILAaPUR Writ Petition (SS No. 2278 of 2003 Ramesh Kumar Soni, S/o Late Shri HanumsnS Ram Soni, aged about 58 years, A.G.ii, Jiia Panchayat, Rajnandgaon (CG). yersus 1 State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Panchayat & Rura! Deveiopment Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (GG). 2 ChhaSisgarh Infrastruoture Devsiopment Corporation (CIDC), Raipur, District Raipur (CG). (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsei for fhe pefitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Adv. General forthe State. ORAL OROER (Passed on this 4tn day of May, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest the matter on merit, at this stage. However, leamed counsel prays that ttie respondent authorities may be directed to consider the pending representation of the petitioner within a stipulated period on the basis of the ietter dated 27-9-2008 (Annexure - P/8) written by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilia Panchayat, Rajnandgaon to the Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, Govemment of Chhattisgarh. 2) Shri Thakur, Learned Dy. Advocate General appearing for the State submite that the representation of the petitioner shali ba considered and decided, in accordance with iaw as wet! as in the iight of the tetter dated 27-9-20(%, as stated above, as eariy as possible at any rate within an outer limit of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3) •• ln view of the above statement made by the learned counsel for fhe State, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner nothing survives in this peUtion for adjudication. 4) Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. — — — R:QWH Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge