IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2174 of 2010 1. SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA S/O SHRI SHIV SHANKAR MISHRA R/O MOHALLA- MAUNA ALOO BAZAR CHAPRA, P.S.- CHAPRA TOWN, DISTT.- SARAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE SECRETARY, PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE SECRETARY, PUBLIC GRIEVANCE CELL, DEPTT. OF CABINET SECRETARIAT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, BIHAR EDUCATION PROJECT COUNCIL AND SECRETARY, DEPTT. OF INFORMATION AND PUBLIC RELATIONS, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE COMMISSIONER, SARAN DIVISION AT CHAPRA 6. THE COLLECTOR, SARAN AT CHAPRA 7. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SADAR CHAPRA, DISTT.- SARAN 8. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL CERTIFICATE OFFICER, CHAPRA, DISTT.- SARAN 9. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, INCHARGE ESTABLISHMENT, CHAPRA, DISTT.- SARAN ----------- 3/ 07/09/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that he does not question the order of the three- man committee insofar as it unseats him as an illegal appointee, not entitled for regularization. Shri Mishra places reliance on the second last paragraph to urge that his services were in fact utilized by the authorities for rendering them necessary assistance in context of issuance of notices, maintenance of records etc. of certificate cases. He therefore submits that the petitioner may be treated as a daily wage employee and would be entitled to his wages for the dates that he may have worked. - 2 - This Court finds substance in that limited submission that if the respondents have utilized the services of the petitioner notionally in the capacity of a daily wager he is entitled to the minimum daily wage fixed in accordance with law as prevalent on the dates that he worked. Let the petitioner submit a representation before the District Magistrate setting out the dates on which he worked when the respondents are obliged to pay him the minimum daily wage as then prevalent in accordance with law within a maximum period of six months from the date of receipt/presentation of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)