L^^^20/tt? ~s 2 XN 3HE MAEH.XA PKADESH.-STA'rB ADMINIS'ERATIVE TRIBONAL -PRIN@IPM7 "BEHGH -AT JABM.PtJR (M.? .;) ?o4^ O.A.NO.I OF 1995 S.N. TIWARI, AGEB ABOTJT 50 YEARS, S/0 &ATB SHRI .B. •EIWAR3:, OCQVs LOWER DIVISIQN C&SSKf .0/0 SALBS TAX OFFICER AMB'IKAPTJR. •BISTT.. SHRGUJ-A (M.P.-) 1) STATE 'OF "HADHYA PRADESHs 'FH.ROUGH; SEaRETARY, COHMERQIAL & SALES TAX, • VALLABH' BHAWAN; 'BHOPAIi (H.P .) 2) QOHMISSIOHBR, S ES TAX, DISTTs INDORE :.p.). 3) DIVISIONAL DY. COI»MISSIONBR, SAl,ES TAX, DIS'TTs BILASFtIR'(M.P.). ' 4) SHRI^.J'.K. SHUKLA, ENQUIRY OFFIOBH, SM.ES TAXQFE'SGBR, BIIASFUR CIRGE.iE-l., SISTTs sr&ASPUR CM.P.). -VS- •APPLIGANT * »r»»iRESPONDB!SETS DBTAILS OF APP&IGATION 1.' PARTIQUIiARS OF THE APPaiOANT; HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR ^cJ^ PETITIQNER WRIT PETITION (Sl N0.1220/2005 S. N. Tiwari Versus RESPONDENTS State of Madhya Pradesh and others Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri, J. Present: - None for the petitioner. ShrfN. Naha Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 12 day of November, 2009) The matter is called for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. (2) In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner forthwith. 130WV i1l