"wss'Sytsssi'9SS ss IN THE HON'ffiLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASFUR Cr.MP N0.^3° OF 2011 PETITIONER ^.^-^M r Shl PK-.iS."^ "',;"; >.^ (:; RESPONDENT Sukhlal, aged about 45 years, S/o Dasharam, caste- Satnami, R/o village : Sukhapali, Police Station Dabhra, Tahsil Dabhra, District: Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VBRSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through District Magistrate, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) PBTITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. ^y w—^ h.^-'gfSh. r7 ^?F4TcT<7, •s^ra"1^, t^ff^T (^r.v^^. l^o.o?3o//f (^ sn^'snfe'fhi' I w 'W^T grqw! ueepi; TCnw^fftgw^ SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 31-10-2011 ^T'qfe.'-fn •qTwft '^ •ts^lt 'i^RCTt ^ aJSsq .^affi; Shri K.K.Dewangan, coun^el for the petitioner. Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, F?anel Lawyer for the State. This petition has been fi|ed by the petitioner aggrieved by order dated 28/03/2011 by which petitioner's |appiication for grant of interim custody has been rejected. j As in the present case, th^ petitioner is alieged to have committed offence under various provisions of Cr+iattisgarh Agricuiturai Cattie Preseroation Act, 2004, in view ofthe order passec) and batch of cases, the applicalion for grant of interim custody of cattie at the instance of the petitioner is not mAintainabie. in that view of the matteit aismissed. by this Court on 21/09/201 1 in CrMP No.270/11 this petition has not merit and is accordingly Man'"c'raMo^- Judge Shrivastava i^^sfss