IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9355 of 2008. Decided on: 06.05.2011. _____________________________________________________ Kanshi Ram. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Himmat Negi, Advocate vice Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General for respondent No.1. None for respondent No.2. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral).: Petitioner is seeking promotion on the basis of seniority assigned to him vide Annexure A-1, as it stood on 31.5.2001. However, during the pendency of this petition, the law on reservation to promotion has changed in view of the judgment rendered by their Lordships of Hon’ble Supreme Court in M. Nagaraj and others versus Union of India and others, (2006) 8 SCC 212. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - 2. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-State to consider the case of the petitioner on the basis of principles laid down by their Lordships of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the judgment cited hereinabove, after doing the needful as directed by their Lordships of Hon’ble Supreme Court. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. May 06, 2010. (sck).