i ,;- ;i ,'p III f^ ^ C'F'0'OM281851 TSS. M.£. ffiPLX.ffiT: Q- '^^ ISTaATIV£ TKI8JNAL AT JABALPUR (M*PV , "N o.A. N0.13J of 19csy A-J-t^9A$>^(s^-/l-' ' itflltEUTSH isa.ikherjee, ^aedafaout :}^ 57 years, s/o Late yaidakant Meikh^i BX-F.G.C. Puhlic sbiks Depar-taaat,.'- y£&s us aE^SEONQMTS 1. 2. 3. 4. ^ie State o£ ,M.P, Ttiiough seci'stary, P.W.Q(B & S) Madhya pradesh,. Btepal (M.P) The Gfaief Engtoeer, P.W.D ( B & a), Raipur, Madhya pradesti. ' ' The Superiiatending Engtoeer, P.1W"?<B &i &) •....-_..-..„ ...._,! AT and f £>.^e»<®»fi. ft.fr \ fc-tt-K t- Oistrict aiswri^JSS^ (^\6^i^^^ BieExecutlveEnainesr, '~-(lf'T P.W.D(B.& a) En. N0. I .•: Anblfcapur, Distrlc-fc-su.cgujadiji.Pl ^E'PI.IGATBN U/S 19 OF Tt-iE ADM IN ISTRATI^ miHJNALS ACT, 1935. ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPLICANT WRIT PETmON (S} No. 1045 of2005 Haradhan Mukherjee. RESPONDENTS VERSUS Staie ofMadhya Pradesh & 3 Others. APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF TrfE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBL'NALACT.1985 SB: Hon'ble Shri Sattsh K. Aenihotri. J. Present: None for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDERrORAL) (Passed on 27U1 day ofOctober, 2009) 1. The matter is called for hearing twice. None appeara nor any representation is made on behalfofthe petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2. In view ofthe above, the matter is disniissed for want ofprosecution. 3. Registry is directed to send a copy ofthis order to the petitioner, forthwith. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge Amit