IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.23520 of 2010 Date of Decision : January 03, 2011. Naresh Kumar Jain .....Petitioner versus Union of India and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the allotment of Retail Outlet Dealership in favour of respondent No.4 at Tohana, District Fatehabad by the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation under open category. Besides the complaints statedly made on 23.7.2010 and 11.8.2010 (Annexures P-2 & P-3, respectively), the petitioner has also served the respondents with a legal notice dated 17.11.2010 (Annexure P4) asserting his superior claim for the said allotment. It is alleged that no action on his complaints/legal notice has been taken by the respondent- Corporation so far, prompting the petitioner to approach this Court. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, however, without expressing any views on his claim and keeping in view the fact C.W.P.No .23520 of 2010 2 that there is internal mechanism provided by the Oil Corporations to investigate and dispose of the complaints received against the preparation of merit panel for allotment of Retail Outlet/LPG Dealership, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to consider and dispose of the complaints/legal notice received from the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and in accordance with law, within a period of one week from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. January 03, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE