IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 17TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 28TH MAGHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 942 of 2011() -------------------------------------- CRIME NO.58/2011 OF GURUVAYOOR POLICE, THRISSUR DISTRICT --------------------------------- PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.2 TO 10 ------------------------------------------------------- 1. SANTHOSH @ BOSHY, VATTAMPARAMBIL UNNIKRISHNAN, KANDANASSERY VILLAGE,CHAVAKKAD TALUK. 2. SUDHEER, S/O. CHOODAPPURAKKAL SUBRAMANIAN, KANDANASSERY VILLAGE,CHAVAKKAD TALUK. 3. YADHUNATH, S/O. CHEEROTH PADMANABHAN, KANDANASSERY VILLAGE,CHAVAKKAD TALUK. 4. PRANEESH, S/O.THADATHIL PRABHAKARAN, KANDANASSERY VILLAGE,CHAVAKKAD TALUK. 5. NIKHIL, S/O. KUSHUIPPULLY PANIYIL VELAYUDHAN, KANDANASSERY VILLAGE,CHAVAKKAD TALUK. 6. BINOY, S/O. KUZHUIPPULLY PANIYIL VELAYUDHAN, KANDANASSERY VILLAGE,CHAVAKKAD TALUK. 7. BIJEESH, S/O. IRIPPASSERY APPUKUTTAN, KANDANASSERY VILLAGE,CHAVAKKAD TALUK. 8. VINEESH,S/O.IRIPPASSERY APPUKUTTAN, KANDANASSERY VILLAGE,CHAVAKKAD TALUK. 9. VINODE, S/O. VADAKKATH VELAYUDHAN, KANDANASSERY VILLAGE,CHAVAKKAD TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.P.S.SREEDHARAN PILLAI SMT.C.G.PREETHA SRI.SANDEEP.T.K SRI.ARJUN SREEDHAR SRI.ANEISH .S. SRI. ARUN KRISHNADHAN SRI. JOSEPH GEORGE MULLAKKARIYIL SRI.RATHEESH KUMAR.K. sts BA.NO.942/2011 RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT/STATE ------------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts V. RAMKUMAR, J. .................................................... Bail Application No. 942 of 2011 ..................................................... Dated this the 17th day of February, 2011. ORDER Petitioners, who are accused Nos.2 to 10 in Crime No.58 of 2011 of Guruvayoor Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 120(B), 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 326, 307 and 109 r/w Section 149 I.P.C., seek their enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 21.01.2011. The petitioners were arrested on 27.01.2011. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioners, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioners are released on bail, they will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv