IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1133 OF 2009 B.S.Dhargalkar ...Petitioner. v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner & Anr. ...Respondents. Mr.Janhavi S. Lanjekar, adv. For the Petitioners. Mr.Suresh Kumar, adv. For the Respondents. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 20th January , 2010. P.C. 1 Considering Section 3B of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 and the affidavit filed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner setting out that banks are not covered. In our opinion, no case is made out for interference in the exercise of our extraordinary writ jurisdiction. 2 Apart from that, the duty was cast on the petitioners to aver and produce the Notification under this Act to show that banks are covered in terms of Section 3B of the said Act. 3 Considering that, in our opinion, this would not be a fit case to exercise our extraordinary writ jurisdiction. - 2 - Hence, the petition stands rejected. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)