, ^.A^ INTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO.^Wy/2004 Petitioner Respondents Veffsiis Bhuneshwar Prasad Banpal S/o Shri Hiran Ram Banpal, Aged about55 years, Assistant Teacher, Government Primary Schooi Chiklakasa No.2, Rajhara, Dist : Durg-(C.G.) ^^\ State of Chhattisgarh Through the ^<^T^V Secretary, School Education D eps ^" ^^•••'' .•-•' <\l--'.\ ••'' Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Dist : Raipur- (C.G.5 2. .--"y^ ^'^y' ^'y0^''' ^•\^"~ "s '^^""...——-.-^.^--.- .-.-^- ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE The Collector, Durg, (Adhivasi Vikas Shaka) / Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare, Durg, Dist: Durg-(C.G-) CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-—78 OT^T ^T ^W^ ^T<3?T^T$ft^ic^ \ :.' ~3^ ^|^I<rl!q,^^^^ Nrt'Rtr^wpti &£ ^, f^TTH^ , i?^M;. ••w*^rZ©0; ^TI^1i^^^3<s|^) 1R<TT^^f^T 3^T; 1/11/2004 Shri P. ni-wakar for the pet| Shri U.N.S. Deo, Govt. Ajd^ Heard,. .•''•• :; : 1'' Learnted courisel for the p rela.tes to tran^fer af the petitioil depar^ment petitioner is in educatiQn effected by the trlba.1 d.epartiYieni.} tiine being ta.ken, return has not Shri Qeo on the other han<|l petitioner may be given an |oy{ repre&entation befbre fhe competj which ehall | be coneidered on Jit< •law;."!::'' :.':-' :/1::-;.-^ ".;'<'• ''^^ Havlnig cpneidered the fsLott 4 ov^nmeritej expreesing any opinion on the ni^ri^Q ble thiQ Coidrt, enda of juQtioe will the petitioner to raake a det| grievEinoes tefore'the competenjt with a copy jof thc pptition and t| sunh rcprc&cntation bcing {ilccl^ rcspondcnts shall dccidn thc ^a!Ti^ with lerw by a. rca,soncci ordcr a^ six -wccks from thc da±cof rcccip clcar thsit if any gricvs.ncc^ still ^ thc rcnicdy sva.ila.blc undcr thcjed 1<=M<lt<?1<fll HI^<yff^f€^L<f^^^^^^^ ^ ^RFT N^T' itidner. '[ i ., for* respQncjents, atitioner submits that tnema-tter ier.1 He furtljier suLbmits -that ihe £ind the transfer hsis been He| also subinits thaLt in jspite of ^eeri filed by jthe Sta.te coun^el. submits th^.t for the present.the >portunity o: filing fhe <letailed ;nt Jauthority of the respondenta; in aocor'darioe w7ith ^ and ciroun^eta.ricee and |witKout i^ritQJ of the <?^.©e,in th|e qpinion of aerved if a directio-n ia given to tuled repreaentatiion |raiQing hie f(.uthbrity of tfce r^^RondentQ alpng |iis ©rdcr^wi1(hin fl,0 c|oy8; ^.nd on thc compctenf authority of thc jc on it^ own hicrrt^ in a.coordancc ^arly as po«s^blcprcfcrably wlthin I: of thc rcprcscntation. II: is madc lcmain5^ thc p^iiticnqr niay eivuil ^ ^' !®gii?Si1^?lfH^I®l XI-HC—78 'S^F T<ll<4T<n ^l, ^xtl •H<l^ R'ctW^ ^1*1011 ^bHlcft "^200 3TT^T ^RT f<Tii<=b TT^T^^T^T sn+iict) ^ 3Ti^rT^N?<y(f^K^ry ^TTW <^%a 3:n^?T - 2 <^H(<ri<fl?l ^(^<yi1l^f fs^l <f^i^K '^3TfTO5a^T 1 Counsel fbr the petition^r aubmits tha:fc the petltloner has }^ for stay till the repre^entation.is^ not been relieved soi-far. He pra^' decided. In view of the fa.cts and^ directed that tlll the repreeenta not relleved,Jhe be allowed to coi|itinue. circum&ta.nces of the case, it is ^ion|ie decided, if the pe^itioner is With the aforeeaid obj di©poeedof. Coneequently M.W. P. No. ^ Qertified oopy as per rule^ ervatione, thi& petition ©tajnds 497,^04 aleo ©tand&diepoeed of. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge r