1 CRI.APPLN.NO.240/2011 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.240/2011. (1. Ashok s/o Dattatraya Baviskar and 2 Ors. Vs. The Stat eof Maharashtra) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.SB Jadhav, Adv. h/for Mr. VR Dhorde, Adv. for applicants; Mr.KM Suraywanshi, APP for State. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 3 rd February, 2011. ... 1) Heard. 2) The applicants/accused, in custody from 25th December, 2010, on the accusations that Vijay s/o Dattatraya Baviskar, brother of the applicants/accused had affairs with Rukhmini/Rupa, the victim. The prosecution case revolves that present applicants/accused have instigated for eloping the victim Rukhmini and hence are facing the custody. 3) Apparently, these applicants have nothing to do with the infraction of Section 376 of Indian Penal Code as it would be principally revolving against Vijay. Further custody of the applicants/accused is not warranted. Nothing is to be recovered from them. 2 CRI.APPLN.NO.240/2011 However, since the applicants/accused, brothers of Vijay, are residing across the road to the house of the complainant or the victim, care has to be taken. Hence, order. 4) The applicants/accused – 1) Ashok s/o Dattatraya Baviskar; 2) Prakash s/o Dattatraya Baviskar; and 3) Rajkumar s/o Dattatraya Baviskar, be released on their furnishing PR bond and surety in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand) each. 5) After release, the applicants/accused shall not live in the village Umri Bazar, they will be living at Kinwat and will furnish their address of Kinwat to the Investigator with contact number. This arrangement is to remain in force till 31st July, 2011. 6) The applicants shall not coerce the witnesses, and in particular the victim Rukhmini. 7) Application allowed as above. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/