1 crap2091.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2091 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2090 OF 2011 _________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _________________________________________________________________________________ Shri G.K.Naik Thigale, advocate for the applicant Shri Ravindra Nirmal, advocate for respondent nos. 1 to 19 ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 9th November, 2011. PER COURT :- 1 Heard respective learned counsel for the parties. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant (original complainant) for condonation of delay of 60 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Application No. 2090 of 2011 seeking leave to file appeal. 2 crap2091.11 3 Shri Nirmal, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 19 opposed the application vehemently and submitted that the present application is without any substance and same is devoid of any merits and same be dismissed. 4 On perusal of the contents of the application and after considering the rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily and it further appears that the delay caused in filing the accompanying application is not willful, deliberate and intentional and same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 5 In the result, present Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 60 days caused in filing the accompanying application seeking leave to file appeal stands condoned and present Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE), JUDGE. dbm/crap2091.11