IN TH HIGH COT OF RMTAKA AT AWh1 DATED T!S THE 16TH DAY OF JIJNE 1998 BEFO RE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SIIHAL IT P1TITION NOS 78 —22 98 ‘76 9— 8 98, IN W.P.No -22198 AND 8. BETWtN: I7fY- * S S*S*5. 1. M/s.Premier Associates, Ward No.111, Jamakhandi, Represented by its Partner S.B.Paragounda. ( CL—2 W.P*No1l./98 2. Jayavant Kalasappa Kale, Age : MaJor, 0cc i Business, Bus Stand Road, Jamakhandi, Dist.Bijapur. ( CL—9 3. S.S.Lonari, Age s Major, 0cc : Business, Zamakhandi. C CL—2 ) 4. B.K.Salian, Age z Major, Ocr : Business, R/o. Ward No.11, Bijapur, C CL—9 W.P.N 0 •L7.tL4’. .i,e . B.R.kalal, Age Major, 0cc s Business, Rio. Basavana Bagewadi. ( CL—9 w.p.,. 6. S.G.Ghodake, Age Major, 0cc : Business, Rio. Bijapur. C CL—9 W.P.No.i’L., 99 7. S.V.Patange, Age x Major, 0cc : Business, Rio. Basavana Bagewadi, Dist. Bijapur. C C12 ) B. M/s.Premjer Associates, Bijapur. Represented by its Partner, S.B.Paragona. C CL—I ) ;,, 2/- II 2 :: W.P,N 2 2W. 198 9, B.Sund Salian, Age : maJor, 0cc : Business, fl/a, Biiapur f Ct—2 3 Age : Major, 0cc : R/o. Musti, Tq. Bagewadi, Dtst, Stiapur’, ( CL—2 ) aMayappa LChikkøi, Age : MaJor, 0cc : Business, R/ø, Nidagunj, Tq, Bagewadi, Dist, BiIapup, ( CL—2 3 (E i irant fo Pea, ,, AND: 1, The Stat. of Karnataka by its Secretary, Finance Vidhana Soudha, Bangalore, 2. The Commissier of Excise, Vakaligara Bhavan, k.R,CtrcZe, Bangalore, , The peputy Commissie, of Excise, Bijapur Distr’ict, Biiapur, 4, The Deputy Commissioner of Excis,, Bagalkot District, Bagalko, 5. The Inspector 01 Excise, Bagalkot Distpict, 6. The Xnspector of Excise, BLJapur District, Bi Japur, (By t, S,jatha, RCGP, r Rdt,) These Writ Ptitiøg filed under Articles 226 & 22? of the of India 4tb an affjda,j prang to: Direct the respondents not to insist the petitioner to ay the aithanced licence fle ride Ann,A and etc. 9,, 3f 4 I Between: 1, Sri M.L.Srinivasa RaG, 6/0 H.Lakshman RaG, Hindu, Major 1 No.4 201/3550 B.H.ROad, Tarikere Town, chic3anagalur District. 2. M/s Shantala Wine Stores, No.3110, Santh Beedi, Tarikere Town, Chickinagalur District, Rep by its proprietor, 4- 3. N.Nagappa, 6/0 Veerappa, No.463, T.M.Road, Lakkolli Tarikere Tãluk, chickmagalur District’. 4. Shulpa Bar & Restaurant, No.183, Tarikere— Hosadurga Road, Ajjampur, Rept by its Proprietor 7 W ci - 5. A.p.chandrashekar, 6/0 Pararneshwaraiah, No.3119/3025, Municipal Road, Tarikere, chickmaga lur District. 6 • Smt • La kshamrna w/o K.Manjunath, No.32, Main Road, Shi’vani, Tarikere Taluk, Chickmagalur Dist. 4’— -a. 7. L.NAnnoji 9*0, 8/o Lingoji 2*0, Hindu, Major, P/o Muddgodai village, No.13, RangenahaUi, ratRcad, aiickmagalur Diet. 8 • B.Thippeswamy, S/o H. Basappa, Hindu, Major, R/o No.96/89, LingathhaUi Road Ballavara village, Tarikere Taluk, Chikamagslur Diet. 9. Seenoji Rao, 5/0 Majoji 9*0, Hindu, Major, No.556, T.X.Aoad, Iakkavalli, Tarikere taluc, thickmagalur Dst. it. MJ4anjimatn, 3/0 Late Kalayappa, Hindu, Major, No.80, rJ4.aoad, njjanpuza, by P.A .Holder,2’l .Lokesh ii • K.Sachiana Shetty, 8/0 Narayana chatty, Hindu, Major, No.4, B.fljcad, Upara sasavana Halli, Tarikere, Chic!anagalur. 12. N/s Kaaiu Bar & Restaurant, No.3668/307 9 (2). Municipal Road, Tarikere, Chic]cungalur tifl, its ?roprietorq i-k,, sta pa -, 13. A.Hamnnnth Mo, 5/0 Ranoji Rio, Hindu, Major. N0.269e2, Berur— Rosadurga Aced, Aamura.j ... — — . . .3 I —5- 14. N,M,MfljUflatha Rao, s/o Muniswarny Rao, Hindu, Major, R/o No.3060/2863, B,H,Road, Tarikere Chickrngalur ist. 15. T,K.Venkatesh, Hindu, Major, No.4156/352°, K.V.3 .Ccinpound,, Tarikere, chicnagalur Diet. 16. M.R.Prakash, 3/0 A.R.Ramaiab, Hindu, Major, No.131, Bundre village, Shivani, R.S.Post, Tarikere, Chic)na.ga1ur East. 17, 3.R.Siddappa, S/o H.S.Puc1rappa, Hindu, Major 1 No.19, B.P.G .Ccnplex, Tirikere, chic}naga lur East. 18. 3.Tipeswamy, s/o B1enappa, Hindu, Major, No.316, T.H.Rod, Ajjampura, Tarikere. 19. Smt.Azzath, W/o Md.Hayath, Muslim, Major, No.3987/3754, B,H.Roaa, Tarikere. 20. sail Kurnar V S/o Ite Vishwanth Rao, Hindu, Major, No.50/2, B.L.Road, Lingadahalli, Tarikere, Chic)nagalur fist ii (By Sri G,V.P.Das for Petrs,) .•. Petitioners ... 6/- -6- AND: 1. The State of Karnataka, rep. by its Seoretary, Finance Dept., Vidhana Soucha, Bangalore. 2. The Coniissioner of xcse in Karnataka, K,R.Circle, Vokkaligara Sangha Building, Bangalore. 3. The Superintendent of Excise, N.R,Road, Bangalore. 4, The Deputy Coriunissiofler of 3xc1se, Cbickrnagalur Dist. Chickmagaltr. 5. The Inspector of Excise, Chic1nagalur Di st., hicInagalur. ... Respondents. (By Snt.3.Sujatha, HCGP, for Respdts.) These Writ Petitions filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India with an affidavit praying to: Quash the circular dated 28-4-98 issued by Ri vide Ann.B and etc. IWJ 7a7: BETWEEN: s, Shivas Bar & Re staurant, Rep. by its Partner - Sri S.D.Bhat, Hotel Sreematha Deluxe Lodging & Boarding, Ginigera Road, No.9-7-680/Si & 82, Koppal, Dist: Raichir. •‘ Petitioner’ V ... 7/- -7- (By Sri Praveen Devashetty for Petr.) AND: 1. The State or Karnataka, by its Secretary, Finare Dept., ‘lidhana •Soudha, Bangalor e. 2. The Commissioner of Thcse, Vokkaligar Bhavan, K.R.Circle, Bangalor e. 3. Deputy Commissioner of Excise, flaichur Dist., Rajehur. ... Repondats. (By &it.3.jatha, HCGP, for Respdts.) This Writ Petition filed under Articles226 & 227 of the Constitution of India with an affi davit praying to: Quash the notification issued by R-1 dated 18-4-98 vide Ann,A and etc. These Writ Petitions comIng on for preliminary hearing this day, the Court made the following: The controversy in the present matter is regarding diand for enhanced security on the basis of the proposed amendment in the Rule. 8/— eB Rules have not taken the final 1ape, This matter was considered by this Court in W,P, Nos, 16788_809/98he11 similar matters D.D. 9-6-1993. In. view Of the said decision ail these petitions are disposed of with the direction that the respon dent would not insist for enhanced security for grant/renewal of the lic’ce, The amount of security as per the existing notification alone would be required. The petitioner would further submit an undertaking that they will deposit the enhanced security if any in accordance with the final notification within 15 days from the date of issue of such notification. If the application has not been submitted, the petitioners would be free to move to the Commissioner for extension of time. The circular with regard to enhancient of the security amount will not be insisted upon. Petitions stand disposed of accordingly, 3d!- Judge. bsr(o.s.) r.by: c®PT c .by: Aeistant RsgisWat igIi Conrt of #irii take A— BangaIOr- 56 O 001