IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-8156 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 13, 2010 Harjinder Singh @ Billu .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Anant Kataria, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.84 dated 29.6.2009 under Sections 121, 121-A, 123, 13, 13-A, 120-B IPC; Sections 3, 4, 5 of the Explosives Act; Sections 10, 11, 13 of Unlawful Activities Act, 1967, registered with Police Station, Raikot. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that entire evidence has been recorded Crl. Misc. No. M-8156 of 2010 [2] by the Trial Court. Not a single witness has given statement against the petitioner to show that the petitioner has committed the offence as alleged. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent- State, on instructions from Balkar Singh, Assistant Sub Inspector, contends that all the witnesses had to be declared hostile. There is no evidence forthcoming against the petitioner. The case is now fixed for the statement of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel further states that no recovery has been effected from the petitioner. 4. Considering the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, the petition is allowed. 5. Bail to the satisfaction of Trial Court. Heavy surety. (AJAI LAMBA) September 13, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?