IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 30879 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 20.10.2011 Parveen Kumar and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Mohd. Salim, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. …… RAJESH BINDAL, J. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the injury on the head on account of which offence under Section 308 IPC was added is attributed to Rajinder Parshad. Even that injury was found to be simple. Injuries attributed to the petitioners were otherwise on non-vital part and were declared simple in nature. He further submitted that Rajinder Parshad was arrested and has already been released on regular bail by the learned court below. Learned counsel for the State did not dispute that the injuries attributed to the petitioners were found to be simple and further that Rajinder Parshad was arrested and has already been released on regular bail. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions made above, in my opinion, the petitioners are not required to be taken into custody for interrogation. They are directed to appear before the In- vestigating Officer on 02.11.2011 at 10.00 a.m. to join investigation and in case of arrest, they shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satis- faction of the Inv estigating Officer. They shall appear before the Investigat- ing Officer as and when called upon for further investigation. They shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 20.10.2011 sharmila