dgm gm gm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.6599 OF 2008 PETITION NO.6599 OF 2008 PETITION NO.6599 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.Bharat Khanna and M.S.Tiwari for the Petitioner. Ms.S. Chaturvedi i/b.M/s. M. K. Chaturvedi for the respondent no.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 3rd October, 2008. : 3rd October, 2008. : 3rd October, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. This is a writ petition whereby the original defendant is challenging the order of grant of amendment in favour of the plaintiff/respondent. Admittedly the Suit is of the year 2004. The issues have been framed. Considering the application as filed in view of order dated 30.1.2006, the plaintiff advised and accordingly has filed the present amendment application. The submission that it is totally changing the nature of proceedings initially filed can be ( 2 ) agitated/re-agitated by raising all the pleas as available under the law. Considering the reasoning so given, at this stage, therefore, I see no reason to interfere with the order of granting such application in favour of the plaintiff. However, all points/ pleas/defences are kept open to be agitated. Writ petition is therefore dismissed. [ ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]