IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-15776 of 2010 Date of Decision: 26.05.2010 Sushil Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. G.S. Thind, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he restricts his prayer for grant of protection to the life and liberty of the petitioner from the hands of respondents No.4 to 7. Accordingly, respondent No.2 is directed to look into the threat perception and take appropriate action, if need be. With respect to the another prayer for registration of the FIR, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the same with liberty to avail of alternative remedy as available to him under law. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 26.05.2010 JUDGE gurpreet