c^- IN THE HON'iBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) N0. ^ /2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^•L^y ^y .<>v> %,..•'•" Kshir Sagar Patel, S/o Late Shri Indrajeet Patel, aged about 59 years, Occupation - service, present p'osted as Revenue Inspector at R.i. Circle-Chandrapur, Tahsil Dabhra, Distt.-Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) VERSUS :1." State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary Revenue and Calamity Management Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, - Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector, (Land Revenue' Department) Janjgir, Distt.- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 3. --^Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue) Dabhra, Distt- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 4F Tahsildar, Dabhra, Distt.-Janjgir-Chainpa (CG) 5; Gopal Prasad Yadav, S/o not known, occu. - service, R.I., presently at R.I. Circle Chandrapur, Tahsil- Dabhra, Distt. — Janjgir- Champa(C.G.) ^l WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^' ^-" ^3sh. iff i [II- i-vy_j^ ^ f-i' as'^ck HSGH COURT OF CHHATTiSOARH : Bi-ASPUR \f\stSV°T "S'^'"'1 "'-!^^ f'€^\ ^-.\f^ ^S^e '^cr w-"1^ ^. ^VH.i i w€-, s s ! s^i'it <0^ s'^^J'. '"SS!.^,0 ^F A,s^ i i "'~!"y^\ I? ! : l<-fS<iL Kshir Saoar Patsi vsrsus ^~E. ^^^•.^ |;^-<p~ a 3-F-ft Keor'UNUfc!''! 1 & S'iafe of Chhattisgarh & Othsrs (Wrlt Petition under Articie 226 of the Consiitution of india) Singis 3ench : Hon'bie Shri Satlsh K. Agnihotri, J. Shri K.N.Nande, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State. Shn Shashank Thskur, Acvocate for ths respondent nsnco /nRAi» '-wrT"\l^'i—i^tt"->«'"rv-\L-/ (Passed on ihis 26"' dav of August, 2011) The petitionsr seeks to chailenge the iegaiity and validity of the order dated 12,08.2011 (Annexure P-1) passed the respondent No.4, whereby, the pstitioner working as Revenue inspector has been iransfsrred from Revenue inspector Cirele, Chandrapur to District Mssci ^usnor Jsnjgif-vjnsmpa. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the pefitioner is at the fag end of his service career and he is going to i-stire within a period ofeleven months, therefore, t'ne impugned order is s'l^^^i, srDi'srsrv sna .SySinsx tns TrsnsTsr poiiCy. Learned co'unsei aRDearing Tor the Stats respondents submits that if the petitioner make a representation within a period of five days, ihe 5aH18 Sil^li Os COHStdSrSCj cHCl ucCIOSCt iH Vi©WOT tH8 TSCt XHS? 3? S nonnai circumsiances, an empioyee who is iiksly to retire wifhin a year, should not be transferred, and pass ths appropriaie order within a seriod of three weeks. in the meaniime, the impugned order dated 12.08.2011 .'Annexure P-1) shaii not be given efrect to in respect of the petitioner. Learned counsei aDDearins for the oe-utioner submits that in view of foreooinc. nothing survives for adjudicaiion in the matter at this SISgti. Accordingiy, the writ petition stands dispossd of. r—~~-- sd/- ! SATISH K. ANGNfflOM Judge ^