IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 23615 of 2008 Between: K.Suryanarayana S/o.Timmappa Resident of H.No.13-126, Birappa Temple Street, Maddikara Village and Mandal, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Panchayat Officer, Maddikara Village and Mandal, Kurnool District. 2 The Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Maddikara Village , Kurnool District. 3 Smt.Kannekanti Lakshmamma W/o.Naganna residing at D.No.13/119-1, Maddikara Village and Mandal, Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in granting permission for demolishing the wall and permitting the 3rd respondent to pass through vide Resolution Orders No.39 dated 31.5.2008 which was confirmed by the Secretary, Village Secretariat, Maddikara Village and Mandal, Kurnool District on 20.06.2008, as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to withdraw the permission granted to the 3rd respondent and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following substantive relief. “to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in granting permission for demolishing the wall and permitting the 3rd respondent to pass through vide Resolution Orders No.39 dated 31.5.2008 which was confirmed by the Secretary, Village Secretariat, Maddikara Village and Mandal, Kurnool District on 20.06.2008, as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to withdraw the permission granted to the 3rd respondent and pass such other order or orders.” This Court while issuing notice before admission on 3.11.2008 directed that in case the 3rd respondent has not opened the door in pursuance of the proceedings dated 20.6.2008 issued by the Panchayat Secretary, she shall not open the same until further orders. Today, when the matter is taken up, the learned standing counsel for the respondent Gram Panchayat has placed before this Court the letter dated 4/12/2008 addressed by the petitioner to the effect that the petitioner and the unofficial respondent have compromised the matter and, therefore, he wants to withdraw the writ petition. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed and the interim order granted by this Court on 3/11/2009 shall stand vacated. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.11.6.2009 msv