RSA No.958 of 2011 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.958 of 2011 (O&M). Decided on: April 07, 2011. Bharat Cotton Factory and another. .. Appellants VERSUS Rattan Kumar. .. Respondent * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporter? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? * * * PRESENT Mr.Ravish Bansal, Advocate, for the appellants. M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) CM Nos.3976-3977-CII of 2011 Misc. applications are allowed. Exemption is granted for filing certified copy of the site plan. The document Annexure A-2, i.e., copy of site plan is permitted to be taken on record. . . . 1 RSA No.958 of 2011 (O&M) RSA No.958 of 2011 Suit of the plaintiff-respondent for possession regarding the suit property has been decreed by giving a concurrent finding of fact on the ground that the defendant-appellant has not been able to establish by virtue of the sale deeds EX.D2 & EX.D3 executed in his favour in the year 2001-2002 that he is owner in possession of the suit property. Counsel for the appellants-defendants has contended that the demarcation report on the basis of which the suit has been decreed has not been prepared in accordance with rules and that no notice had been served upon the defendants-appellants at the time of demarcation. After going through the judgments of the Courts below, on appreciation of the statement of PW.1 Ram Chander and the admission of defendant-appellant No.2, that notice was issued to the defendants and that defendant No.2, was present at the spot but had refused to sign on the demarcation report, the Courts below have decreed the suit of the plaintiff-respondent. No ground is made out for interference in the concurrent finding of fact arrived at by the Courts below. No substantial question of law is involved in the present appeal. Dismissed. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE April 07, 2011. rka . . . 2