1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA. WRIT PETITION NO.42 OF 2005 Smt. Prema Atmaram Vargaonkar and another. ... Petitioners. V/s Mrs. Rose Furtado and nine others. ... Respondents. Mrs. A. Agni, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. M.B. D'Costa, Advocate General with Mr. Joshi, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondent no.10. CORAM: A.P. LAVANDE J. DATE: 5TH MAY, 2005. P.C. Mr. Joshi waives notice on behalf of respondent no.10 having regard to the nature of the relief prayed, it is not necessary to issue notice to respondent nos.1 to 9. The grievance of the petitioner is that Revision Petition bearing No.5/2001 which has been filed by the petitioner before respondent no.10 on 20.2.2001 is not being decided although a period of over four years has lapsed. Mr. M.B. D'Costa, learned Advocate General appearing for the respondent no.10 has made a statement that the respondent no.10 who has been now duly authorised to hear revision applications under the Land Revenue Code, will take up Revision Petition No.5/2001 for hearing and 2 decide the same. Respondent no.10 is directed to dispose of Revision Petition No.5/2001 expeditiously and in any case within a period of two months from today. Rule is made absolute in aforesaid terms. No order as to costs. A.P. LAVANDE, J. ef.