IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48844 of 2007 RAUSHAN KUMAR SINGH & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6 31.7.2008. Heard counsel for the petitioners and the State. All four petitioners have been named as accused in Katra P.S.Case no.60 of 2007 registered for offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Informant is husband of the deceased who claimed to have witnessed the petitioners entering into the room and thereafter coming out. He also thereafter saw that his wife has been killed by putting rope on her neck and strangulating her. So far petitioner no.1 Raushan Kumar Singh and petitioner no.3 Rupesh Kumar Singh are concerned it has been submitted that they are Juvenile. In case they are claiming to be juvenile the should approach the competent court and raise this points which should be decided under the Juvenile Justice Act. They cannot claim to be juvenile for grant of anticipatory bail. So far petitioner no.2 Veenit Kumar Singh alias Veenit Prasad Singh is concerned he is alleged to have committed offence as per the eye witness account his prayer for bail is rejected. However, the case of petitioner Ranjeet Kumar Singh alias Ranjeet Singh alias R.K.Singh is different from other petitioners. Considering that his prayer is allowed and he is directed to surrender before the C.J.M. Muzaffarpur within four weeks from today and on his so surrendering he shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like - 2 - amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Muzafferpur in connection with Katra P.S.Case no.60 of 2007 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Sss/- (Mridula Mishra, J)