IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3366 of 2010 1.NEMANI YADAV 2.Kailu Yadav 3.Sahind yadav @ Sabendra yadav 4.Bidio Yadav…………………………………Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 7.4.2010 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner No.4, namely, Bidio Yadav has been arrested during the pendency of this application. Therefore, the application filed on behalf of petitioner no.4 has become in- fructuous and is dismissed as such. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Amarpur (Fullidumra) P.S. case No. 116 of 2005 dated 7.7.2005 registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307 of the Indian penal Coded as also under section 27 of the Arms Act. According to the prosecution case petitioners are alleged to have participated in firing and are alleged to have caused injury to several persons. In that view of the matter, this court is not inclined to accede to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Petitioners must surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and seek regular bail, if so advised. If such - 2 - a petition is filed, then the same may be disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) M.Rahman