IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 20TH JANUARY 2009 / 30TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 36812 of 2008(G) ---------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- CHEKKOOTTY.N.K.,S/O.UMMAR, NAVARKANDY HOUSE, VAKAYAD POST, NADUVANNUR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.SUDHEER RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE PROJECT OFFICER, JILLA KHADI GRAMA VYAVASAYA OFFICE,KOZHIKODE. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KSEB, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, PERAMBRA.. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ELECTRICAL DIVISION, NADAPURAM. 4. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION,,KSEB, NADAVANNUR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 5. CHAIRPERSON, OFFICE OF THE CHAIRPERSON, CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM,KSEB, GANDHI ROAD, KOZHIKODE-32. R2 TO R4 BY SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, KSEB GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI C.K. GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.C. NO. 36812 OF 2008 G ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th January, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner seeks implementation of Ext.P2. Ext.P2 order reads as follows: “During the hearing, the respondents deposed that administrative sanction has already been accorded by the Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, Nadapuram on 15.12.2007 for installing one 100 KVA Transformer at Thazhathu Kadavu after drawing 1.5 KM of 11KV Single Circuit Line under the Voltage Improvement Scheme of the K.S.E.Board on OTP and the work will be completed and line charged by the end of August, 2008. The petitioner can avail electric connection under SSI Scheme thereafter. The petitioner agreed to avail the connection after the line is charged. A joint statement on the above has been furnished by the petitioner and respondents (copy enclosed). The Petition is disposed of accordingly directing the respondent to effect connection on or WPC.36812/08 G 2 before 30th September, 2008 if the petitioner furnished the required application for service connection to the respondent in time.” 2. The complaint is non-compliance. In view of Ext.P2, the respondents in Ext.P2 are bound to act in compliance with the same. Learned standing counsel for the respondent Electricity Board on instructions submits that the reason why sanction could not be granted was that there was dispute, the matter was referred to the Additional District Magistrate, and the Magistrate has granted permission and seventy per cent of the work is over, and the work can be completed by 28.02.2009. I record this submission and direct the fourth respondent to give electric connection to the petitioner's Unit at the earliest and, at any rate, on or before 10.03.2009. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/= K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge