IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1031 of 2010 GYANENDRA JHA son of Dr. Binoda Nand Jha, residing at Puja Grih Gayatri Nagar, P.S+ District- Motihari, East Champaran. At present Managing Director, Indu Varna L.P.G Bottelling Private Limited, situated at Katkenwa tola Panchbhiriya, P.O and P.S ramgarhwa, District- East Champaran. --------- Petitioner Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Principal Secretary, Home Department Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Inspector General of Police. Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 5. The Dy. Superintendent of Police, Raxual, District- East Champaran. 6. The office-in-charge of Ramgarhwa Police Station, District- East Champaran. 7. Roop Narayan Singh, son Beni Prasad Sah, resident of village Kauwa Dhongar, P.S. Bhelahi, District- East Champaran. -----------Respondents For the Petitioner- Sharda Nand Mishra For the Respondent- Krishna Murari Prasad 2. 07.03.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The prayer of the petitioner is for quashing the first information report of Ramgarhwa P. S. Case No. 114 of 2010. It is submitted that the aforesaid case has been filed is retaliation of the case lodged by the petitioner against the respondent no. 7, the informant of the present case. The petitioner’s F.I.R which has been lodged is registered as Ramgarhwa P. S. Case No. 109 of 2010 registered on 16.7.2010. The learned counsel submits that on perusal of the agreement as contained in Annexure 2 it would appear that a business agreement was entered into between the petitioner and one Dilip Kumar the Director of Shri Shakti Petroleum & Gas Pvt. Ltd in which the respondent no. 7 was nowhere. In other words, it is submitted that there is absolutely no business connection between the petitioner and the 2 respondent No 7 however, on account of illegal act committed by the respondent no. 7, the petitioner had lodged the F.I.R against him vide Annexure 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that whether the respondent no.7 had any business connection in the affairs of the petitioner’s business as a matter of investigation. More so the allegation is on the accused persons of the F.I.R as contained in Annexure 1 and the petitioner is also having serious allegations with regard to the physical assaults etc. Considering the rival submissions of the parties, it is in the expedient interest of justice that both the police Cases vide Ramgarhwa P.S. Case no. 114 of 2010 as contained in Annexure 1 as also the Ramgarhwa P. S. Case No. 109 of 2010 be investigated expeditiously without unnecessary delay and the report be submitted after completion of the investigation. The writ application is accordingly disposed of. Namita ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)