IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 922 of 2009 Date of decision: 04.05.2009 Dila Ram … Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. … Respondents Coram : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner: Mr. B.N. Mehta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. R.M. Bisht, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3. Per Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral): By means of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 30.7.2008 passed by the Additional Registrar(Monitoring), Cooperative Societies, H.P. in the review petition filed by the petitioner, being case No. 196/2007. A perusal of Para-5 of the operative portion of the impugned order clearly shows that the Additional Registrar in a review petition ordered the re-audit of the entire accounts with a view to satisfy the present petitioner. After the entire accounts were explained, it has been recorded that Dila Ram (the petitioner) has understood the case in terms of the account and admits that Rs.15,054/- is payable to the Society as on 31.3.1997. His only grievance was that he should not be 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 held liable to pay interest on the amount awarded. In the writ petition, there is no averment that this statement has been incorrectly recorded. In view of this, the petitioner cannot be permitted to challenge the findings of the Additional Registrar. The interest awarded is reasonable. Therefore, we find no merit in the writ petition, which is accordingly dismissed. CMP No. 1614 of 2009: In view of the dismissal of the main petition, this application has become infructuous. ( Deepak Gupta ), Judge ( V.K. Ahuja ), May 04, 2009 Judge (BSS) 3