MC 3101/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. M.H. Rajbarbhuyan, learned counsel for the applicants/writ petitioner and Mr. M. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department, Govt. of Assam . The applicants by this application points out the following typographical mistak es in the order dated 18.08.2010. (A) The name of the school(s) shown against that of the petitioner Nos.3 and 4 o ught to read as- (i) Adhar Chand H.S. School, Silchar, (ii) Baleswar H.S. School respectively. (B) The dates of the orders by which the petitioners were allowed to hold the cu rrent charge of the Office of the Principal of their respective Schools alongwit h the Annexure number as per the writ petition ought to be- I. Petitioner No.1 - Order dated 23.11.2004(Annexure - 1 (B). II. Petitioner No.2 - Order dated 04.12.2000(Annexure - 2(B). III. Petitioner No.3 - Order dated 08.09.2004(Annexure - 3(B)). IV. Petitioner No.4 - Order dated 25.08.2003(Annexure - 4(B)). The mistakes as pointed out are borne out by the records, except the one under (ii) Head - A need to be corrected. Ordered accordingly. As a consequence, as well in the sub paragraph which starts as I have bestowed my anxious consideration to the rival pleadings and the arguments advanced. Th at the petitioners & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & continued over the years unabated, the line The documents submitted by the pe titioners, more particularly, the orders dated 30.12.2005 (Annexure 1(a), 29.01. 2007 (Annexure 2(a) and 24.04.2007 (Annexure 3(a), unambiguously demonstrate tha t petitioners No.1, 2 and 3 are functioning as Principal, In-charge in their res pective institutions and amongst others are authorized to conduct official trans actions as drawing and disbursing authorities would read as hereunder: The documents submitted by the petitioners, more particularly, the orders dated 23.11.2004(Annexure - 1(B)), 04.12.2000(Annexure - 2(B)), 08.09.2004(Annexure - 3(B)) and 25.08.2003(Annexure - 4(B)) unambiguously demonstrate that Petitioner Nos.1, 2,3 and 4 are functioning as Principal, In-charge of their respective in stitutions and amongst others are authorized to conduct official transactions as drawing and disbursing authorities. In other words, the corrections as suggested and accepted as above, would stand incorporated in the order dated 18.08.2010. The Misc. Case stands allowed in the above terms.