IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) No. us'^ /2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1] 2] 3] / ,\.^r4] ^"^ .^ ^y ^' ^ ^' ^' > ,.^ '^" ..^:ftN 5] ^" 6] Ku. Supriya Dubey D/o. Kripal Dubey, Aged about 2-^years, R/o. Namnakala Near of Rice Mill, Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through: Secretary, Panchayat & Gramin Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) Collector, Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG) Janpad Panchayat, Balrampur, through: Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Balrampur, District Surguja (CG) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Balrampur, District Surguja (CG) Zila Panchayat, Surguja, through: its Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Surguja, District Surguja (CG) Block Education Officer, Balrampur, DistrictSurguja (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA rrx33L^v^mx>_j<slY. [C—78 'S^ T^WW<4, ^^\W\<o, ^WW^< ^,^^.^&..K>..^^, ^ ^ll^l 'q^? (<i?^q<i?) ^H^T ^T f^'ljoh 'TOT 3?1^T 9ii^icr> »^' ^^ :^ ^, '^ ^Rnw^f^T^n^T SB: HON'BLE JUSTICB 24.8.2009 Shri Manoj Paranjape, 4 Shri Vivek Shaniia, P.L.j ^-"o 'r?^gtoi\R^kaj Shrivastaval, '^^ ^ ^;<?f^..^ '^^feft&e}? for the responl the<i^i$tf^iiy^ved in this cas^ ! &1 MS^Ka&Karmi Grade III hearing before termination frc^ before tiiis Court in the mattel af Chhattisgarh & Others further submits that since nd the petitioner before termirl appropriate steps m terms of't| Punam (supra), before pa^ authorities wlll try to conclud| of three weeks. The Chief impugned order of removal. In view of the above, the petitioner, nothing survive^ Considering the facts o| in the matter of Ku. Punam (si^ dated 28.2,2009 (annexure ^ reserved to the respondents/^ in accordance with law. With the above GM<ltd<fl<1 'WT^lf "^* 'fe^St <H31<^J< ^^tRm^TT^i PmTINKBR DIWAKER ounsel for the petitioner. for the State/resp. No. 1 & 2. counsel ibr respondent No. 3 8s 4. (ients No. 3 & 4 fairly submits that is that whether the petitioner, who |ias been affbrded an oppoxtunity of |m the post, came into consideration of Ku.Punam &> Others ¥s. stage f^ported in 2008 (2) COLJr 366. He proper opportunity was aiYorded to (ation, the authoritiea shall take |ie judgment and order passed in Ku. jsing any order. The concemed ^ the whole exercise within z^ period [Executive Officer has passed the ac^ording to the counsel appearing for 1 in this petition for adjudication. the case and the judgment passed |.pra), the impugned order of removal 1.1) is quashed. However, liberty is ?4uthorities to take approp'riate steps. obser^atjion, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge ^-