THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT APPEAL NO.2578 OF 2005. DATED: 28-12-2005 Between Trikkal Advertising (p) Ltd., Plot No.27, UBI colony,Road No.3 Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, rep. By Its Director. ….Appellant And 1.The Hon’ble Labour Court-I rep. By its Presiding Officer, Hyderabad and another. …Respondents JUDGMENT (Per the Hon’ble B.Prakash Rao, J) Heard both sides and at their request, the main appeal itself is taken up for disposal. The appellant herein is the writ petitioner which has obtained interim direction in the writ filed challenging the orders passed by the Labour Court in regard to the entitlement of the 2nd respondent herein, pending writ petition. The learned single Judge granted interim suspension subject to condition the petitioner deposits half of the amount covered by the order of the Labour Court within a period of six weeks from that day and on such deposit, the 2nd respondent herein shall be entitled to withdraw the same, without furnishing any security. The main submission made on behalf of the appellant is that as per the orders passed by the Labour Court, the interest amount runs far beyond the principal amount and therefore, the amount to be deposited is much more than the amount actually the 2nd respondent would be entitled to. Having considered the submissions made and on perusal of record, it is seen that these are the questions which cannot be gone into in this appeal at this juncture which are being discretionary in its nature. There is no dispute with regard to the orders passed by the Labour Court and half of the amount was directed to be deposited. Therefore, in view of the discretion already exercised by the learned single Judge, we do not find any reasons to interdict the same. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. ---------------------------- B.PRAKASH RAO, J Dated: 28-12-2005. Hsd ------------------------------- P.S.NARAYANA, J