u ^ J (L^ \ 'sr^l /^ COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR Writ Petition (St N0. ^3<^ /2009 prrmoNER RESPONDENT ^0''' ^- ^^'" yy >..,"'" ..."-".^'^-'-' ^'~ .-'" ^-^S^. R. Korram S/o Gyaii Singh Aged about 59 years, Occupation working as a Rrincipal Govt. Higher Secondmy School, Anda District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS J^State ofChhattisgarh through The Secretary Education Department School and Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G<| 2)^.District Educatian Ofiicer Durg District Durg (C.G.^ WJRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA '^'^^... .-.-.—^.—.._.---.——— ^^^K^:-^ ./^'^.^\ '""^, /;"^^^^ '^ ^ ''., • 'y Y ^-:i../. ^^' ^^.^.-..-^ <^- IININN* HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BtLASPUR WRiT PETITION (S) N0. 5329 OF 2009 Petitioner S.R. Korram Versus Respondent State of Chhattisgarh & Another WRIT PET!T!ON UNDER ARTJCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTiON OF iNDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K.Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri SomRant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State/respondents. ORDER(ORALI (Passed cn 04th day of January, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that with the passage of time, the petition has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side does not controvert the above submission. 3. !n view of the above, the writ petition is dismjssed, as having become infructuous. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge ash^