1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 3506 OF 2009 Tanaji S/o Balasaheb Shinde and others Versus The State of Maharashtra. *** Mr. R. J. Nirmal, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. V. D. Godbharle, A.P.P. for the Respondent / State. *** CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED: 12th OCTOBER, 2009. 1. Heard learned counsel for the accused/ applicants. The victim, 17 years old, belonging to S.C. caste, in the night of 30th August, 2009 left abode for attending natures call, however, did not return for a sufficient long duration. She was searched on the next day, but not traced. However, parents got a communication from the victim that she was abducted by the accused giving their names. Consequently, she came home, resulted in following of lodging F.I.R. The accused/ applicants were put under arrest on 5th September, 2009. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. 2. On instructions, learned counsel for the accused/ applicants withdraws the application to the extent of Tanaji S/o Balasaheb Shinde, R/o Shirala, Taluka and District Latur, Kutuboddin S./o Ibrahim Shaikh and Dhananjay @ Gotya S/o Shivaji Shinde. 3. The role attributed to the other applicant Ram Babasaheb Gavane and Pintu @ Vilas S/o Ganpati Mali is that they associated the abduction with said accused while the role of Kutboddin and Dhananjay was also activated thereafter. There was no indication that accused/ applicants have exerted any threat to the victim to join company of said Tanaji, No allegation of sexual ravishment against present accused/ applicants. The accused/ applicants allege that the entire incident is concoction of events based on political rivalry in the village. Keeping the political rivalry aside, however, the minimal role displayed against the accused/ applicant and since 3 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. they are in custody from 5th September, 2009 and nothing is to be recovered from them, they deserve bail on condition. Hence order. 4. The application of Tanaji Balasaheb Shinde, Dghananjay @ Gotya S/o Shivaji Shinde and Kutboddin S/o Ibrahim Shaikh is withdrawn and dismissed. 5. The accused/ applicant Ram S/o Babasaheb Gavane and Pintu @ Alias Vilas S/o Ganpati Mali be released on their individually furnishing P.R.Bond and surety in the sum of Rs.20,000/- [Rupees twenty thousand only]. 6. After release, the accused/ applicants shall not stay in the jurisdiction of Murud Taluka, District Latur Police Station till completion of trial. 7. The accused/ applicants shall furnish their change address to the investigator with contact number and also record their attendance to such nearest police station on every last Sunday of the 4 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. month, till the trial. Application disposed of in above terms. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:12/10/2009. ans/3506