IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.221 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Sushil Chaudhary S/o Sri Surendra Singh ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: March 25, 2010 ____________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.248/2008 Under Sections 384/119 of IPC P.S. Cantt, Dehradun ________________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri L.K. Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Amit Bhatt, learned Additional G.A. for the State and also perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the complainant Roshan Lal, who has lodged the FIR of the said incident against the applicant/accused, has not supported the prosecution case before the trial court. Another witness namely Mehar Singh has also been examined in the trial court and he too has been declared hostile by the prosecution. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that now there is no witness of fact left to be examined in the above said case. He further submitted that the applicant is in jail for last one and half year in connection with the above said case. After considering all the facts and circumstances; on hearing learned counsel for the parties; on perusal of the contents of FIR and on perusal of the statements of Roshan Lal and Mehar Singh, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant-Sushil Chaudhary be released on bail on his executing personal bond and also on furnishing two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Dehradun. The bail application is disposed of. (Dharam Veer, J.) 25.03.2010 RG