IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 18TH DECEMBER 2007 / 27TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 WP(C).No. 37540 of 2007(R) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ T.P.VARGHESEM 57/3535, T.D.ROAD, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.JYOTHI PRASAD RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL, COLLEGE SECTION, KSEB, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL, KSEB, VYTTILA, ERNAKULAM. BY SHRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------- WP(C) No. 37540 of 2007 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 18th day of December, 2007 J U D G M E N T Prayer in the writ petition is only for implementation of Ombudsman's order produced as Ext.P4. It is seen that Ombudsman has found that the diversion of electricity granted under domestic tariff for use in advocate's office comes under unauthorised load and bill has to be finalised by 1 st respondent after hearing petitioner's objection as provided under Section 126(3) of the Electricity Act 2003. In the circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing 1 st respondent to look into the Mahazar and finalise bill after hearing petitioner's objection as provided under Section 126(3) of the Electricity Act, 2003. If petitioner has any grievance against the bill so finalised by 1 st respondent, petitioner can file appeal against the same. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) jg