1 PGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Criminal Revision Application No.592 of 2008 The State of Mah. .. .. Applicant (orig.Complainant) v/s. Jawed Ramjan Shaikh .. .. Respondent (Orig.Accused No.16) Mr.S.R. Shinde,APP for Applicant. Mr.Kuldeep S. Patil for Respondent. ----- CORAM : SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J. Dated : 4th November 2009 P.C. : 1.This Application is filed by the State against the order discharging accused No.16 in Sessions Case No.10 of 2002. The impugned order shows the role played by accused No.16 in paragraph 32 of the order. Aside from a threat shown to have been given by accused No.16 and his presence in Juice Bar, no overt act is shown. 2.The learned APP drew my attention to paragraphs 6 and 7 of the impugned order. It only shows the submission on behalf of accused No.16. The learned APP has not shown any overt act of accused No.16. There have been several accused who have been discharged from this case either by the trial Court or by this Court. I am told that the order of discharge has been upheld by the 2 Supreme Court. Aside from the submission on behalf of the prosecution that accused No.16 took an active part, the learned APP has not been able to show any overt act of accused No.16. Hence, the order of discharge does not require any interference. 3.The Application is rejected. (SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.)