C; Qi‘ g .\ ,w‘w’; am gvHJ‘ ‘ ‘K \ w <6 $ ‘ \QC‘ J IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (S) No. €909 OF 2011. RESPONDENTS :l. State of Chhattisgarh, / Through : The Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2. District Education Officer, District Education Office Durg, District Durg (C. G.) 3. Additional District Education Officer, Education District Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Block Nawagarh, District Durg (C.G.) ‘“ wwwwWWWIWWW n v i « Maw mmmmmmwmmnwmm"WW r f “ ’V W M..WWM.gmmmwmmmmmwJ W PETITIONER /’ Nirdesh Kumar Banjare, ”d Son of Dhanesh Ram Banjare, aged about 44 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle .1 x. u: School Sambalpur, Block (Jgw 72W Nawagarh, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Ej! WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA g? Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner ts entitled to benefit of two advance increments on account of he having passed B. Ed. examination before appointment at his own cost. It is submitted that the issue involved in the present petition is no ionger res integra and the same has been ti Court in the case of Asha Saxen MPJR (SC) 59. It is further subn' similar view in his order dated 06-02-2009 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of etitioner further draws attention of this )assed in Writ Appeal No.124 of 2009, t of the Supreme Court in the case of gr passed by this Court in another Writ 'e been issued for consideration of the ements as per circular dated 21-09-1974 Pradesh, after veriflcation of the facts 1ally decided by the Hon'ble Supreme a vs. State of M.P. & Ors., 2009 (III) itted that this Court has also taken a 2008. Learned counsel for the p Court to order dated 29-04-2010 r wherein relying upon the judgmer Asha Saxena (supra) and the ordt Appeal No.87/2009, directions ha\ case for grant of two advance incre issued by the State of Madhya pleaded in the petition. Learned counsel for the re aspondents submits that now the State. r on 05-01-2011 and the case of the Government had issued a circul petitioner would be examined in the light of the decision of the State Government. Era W, m,W w?\g7w ‘ Sqag \ mmm m 200 am anm am my! 3mm 3W W (Wm mmm 311w WWW if fzéma‘grt $ sifm am? SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 30-09-2011 Shri Mirza Hafeez Baig, coun sel for the petitioner. Shri Praveen Das, Deputy Government Advocate for the State/respondents on advance copy‘ Heard. WWWW mm m 200 mW (Wm) \ am m W am Warsaw WW m'tm aaaimawraw mmm #2” Tumane ln vie'w of the statement mad‘= above this petition is finaiiy disposed of with a (gigeaotiggyt‘o t; xv : .v the respondent i authorities to conSIder and decude the advance Increments in View of the o iaw M Igldé W t o in view of Ircular, which has been Issued by the / ~ w o ‘ s tate Government on 05-01-2011 ter vefifcation of the facts pleaded in the petition Within a period of thre months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order i” a ' sw- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge S f