'•s... s "* '^'^•"^. ^ •^s^ ^.,s'^ s^ "^ST'S'.^'^' ^ Gowri HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSOARH : BILASPUR PETiTIONER RESPQNDENTS WRiT PETITSON (CT N0.3256 of 2009 Stekuntala Devs, aged about 70 years, W/o Shri Shiv Shankar Chandravanshi, R/o Jagmai Chowk, BSock Tahsii & Distrsct Bilaspur(CG). Versus 1. Rajani Bhai Jivan Putra, ageci about 55 years, SD/o Butuk Bhal, R/o Ward No.34, Tikrapara, Bilasur, Tahsil & Distriet Biiaspur (CG). 2. The Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Biiaspur (CG). . 3. The Coliector, Bilaspur, District BBaspur (CG). (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Con^itution of india) Single Bench : Hon'bie Shri Sateh K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Mr. Anit Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Wr. Sudeep Agrawal, counsal for Uie respondant No.2. Mr. M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate for Uie Stete. ORDER (ORAU <Passed an this 9 day of Juiy, 2009) Heard iearned counsel for the parties. 2) At the very oute^, Shri Sude^; Agrawal, tearned counsei appearing for the respondent No.2, submits that the responcfent No;2 is not wiiling to demolish any structure, which has been approved by ths Municipal Corporation, however, there te a dispute with regard to iocation of the structur®, thus, demarcation by the Revenue authortties is nscessary. 3) As demarcation is stil! pending, no damolition shall take ptace titl the dsmareation report is fiied by the Revenue autharities and objection, if any is fiied by the petitioner. 4) ln view of foregoing, according to teamed counsel appearing for the petitioner nothing survives in this writ petition for adjudication. 5) Accordingty, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge