IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH MAY 2008 / 7TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 15745 of 2008(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. NIZAMUDEEN, S/O. SHAMSUDDIN LABBA, NIZAM MANZIL, KOTTARAKKAI, MURUKKUMPUZHA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPT., SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KADAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 15745 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 28th day of May, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext.P7 notice directing the petitioner to appear for a hearing for taking appropriate decision on an appeal in respect of mutation effected the petitioner's properties. According to the petitioner, the 3rd respondent has no jurisdiction to initiate proceedings as contemplated in Ext.P7. 2. I am of opinion that Ext.P7 being only a notice, the petitioner can raise all his contentions including the contention regarding want of jurisdiction. If such a contention is raised by the petitioner before the 3rd respondent, the 3rd respondent shall consider the same also while passing final orders. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2