THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU and THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR Dated: 20-08-2011 WRIT APPEAL No. 635 OF 2011 Between: Board of Intermediate Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Vidya Bhavan, Nampally, Hyderabad, rep., by its Secretary ... APPELLANT AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Secretariat, Hyderabad and five others …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU and THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL No. 635 OF 2011 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Nisar Ahmad Kakru) Performance of writ petitioner – respondent 1, a candidate of I year Intermediate, came to be cancelled followed by order debarring him from two subsequent examinations i.e., for IPASE May/June, 2010 to IPE 2011 for malpractice, consequently a writ petition. An application for interim relief was preferred which begot an interim suspension of the impugned order which was sought to be vacated by the appellant – Board of Intermediate Education by medium of WVMP No. 2067 of 2011, but of no avail to the appellant and in effect, the basic interim order came to be confirmed, therefore, this writ appeal. Apart from the grounds urged against the order, it is averred that after the dismissal of WVMP, respondent 1 filed an application seeking a direction for declaration of his results which is pending. Contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that dismissal of WVMP No. 2067 of 2011 is likely to influence the learned single Judge for granting the relief to respondent 1 in the subsequent application for appearance in the examination. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. In our opinion, ends of justice would be met by allowing the writ petitioner – respondent 1 to study the course but his results shall not be declared. Regard being had to the nature of controversy, it would be appropriate to direct the listing of the writ petition after two weeks with a request to the learned single Judge to dispose of the same at the earliest. Disposed of. VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ 20-08-2011 K. Shyleshi