BA-480-11.sxw 1 Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.480 OF 2011 Sachine Rajaram Gaikwad ... Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra, Thru' Kharghar Police Station ... Respondent None for the Applicant. Mr. K.V. Saste, APP, for the Respondent. CORAM:- A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED :- 13 TH JULY, 2011. P.C. : 1. Advocate for the Applicant is absent. Heard Mr. Saste, the learned APP for the Respondent. 2. The copy of the Charge-Sheet is not annexed to the Bail Application. However, with the assistance of the learned APP, I have gone through the Bail Application and the annexures thereto. I am also shown a report submitted by the Investigating Agency to the learned APP. 3. Apparently, the Applicant was identified as one of the culprits in the Test Identification Parade, duly held in the course of investigation. It also appears that part of the robbed property has been recovered at the instance of the Applicant. It is also reported that two other previous cases - one in respect of an offence punishable under Section 307 of the IPC and the other in respect of an offence punishable under Section 379 of the IPC - are pending against the Applicant. BA-480-11.sxw 2 Dixit 4. Considering the nature of the offence, the antecedents of the Applicant and all other relevant circumstances, I am not inclined to release him on bail. This is particularly so, because no oral arguments in support of the Bail Application have been advanced. 5. The Bail Application is rejected. [A.M. THIPSAY, J.]