IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 15437 of 2008 Between: Ananthula Shankhar Lingam, S/o. A. Vekataiah, R/o. 19-07-102, Lakshmi Nagar, Godvari Khani, Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Joint Collector (Civil Supplies), karimnagar, Karimnagar District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapalli, Karimnagar District. 3 The Tahsildar, Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings No.D/1233/2008, dt. 31-2008 of the 2nd respondent as being arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same and issue a further direction to the respondents to permit the Petitioner to continue as F.P. Shop dealer of Godavarikhani, Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.LAKSHMA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 15437 of 2008 Oral Order: The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of suspension pending inquiry of his authorization for the Fair Price Shop No. 4536, Godavarikhani, Ramagundam mandal, Karimnagar District. When the matter is taken up today for hearing, the learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies places before this Court a copy of the order of the 2nd respondent in proceedings bearing No.D/1233/08 dated 18-07-2008 withdrawing the impugned order dated 30-05-2008. In the light of the above order of the 2nd respondent dated 18-07-2008, the grievance in the writ petition does not survive. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as ‘infructuous’. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 22-07-2008 pvks