L •<<^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR W.P.ISlNo. 5435 of 2006 PETITIONER Daduram Mandlekar S/o. HorUal Mandlekar, Aged about 44 years, Post - Assistant Teacher, R/o. ViUage & Post- Bin-a, District Janjgir-Chama (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1 State Govt. ofChhattisgarh Tbrough Secreteiy, Departinent of Education, Maatralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 District Education Ofl&cer, Janjgir, District Jaiijgir-Champa (C.G.) 3 Block Education OflBcer, Block- Bamhanidih, Distnct - Jaajgir- Champa (C.G.) (Writ PeUtion under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indlal Appearance: Shri Raraakant Pandey, counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer, for fhe State on advance copy. ORALQRDER (34.08.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on adinission. Learaed counsel for fhe petitioner submits that the petitioner has passed D.Ed. exainiaation on his own expenses, therefore, he is entiUed to receive two advance iucreiuents accordmg to circulars dated 24.12.1998 aad 01.03.1999. He also subDuts fhat ia inaay identical niatters, the petitions have beeu allowed iu terms of fhe order passed iu fhe case of Tashwtuit Kwm.ar Bheiradwcii Vs. JMunteipdI Con»oration, Durti and anotfaer {2006 QS SSPJR-CG 961. He submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the said Judgment. This legal position is not disputed by fhe learaed counsel for fhe State. However, he subniits fhat the order ihay be passed in terms of the said judgmeut, but it shatt be subjected to verification regarding petitioner's such qualification. '?S-~-'wSS'3':KS:!t.ii I'.--'i-'. \ ••<T' -^ W.P.fSI No. 5435 of 2006 Accordiagly, this writ petition is aUowed ia terms of the order passed iu case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mumdpcd Corporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to verification of the facts as to whefher title petitioner had acquired D.Ed. Examinatiou Cerdficate on his own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 aad 01.03.1999 aad further whefher he has been paid two advauce increnients or not The petition stands finaUy disposed of. No order as to costs. •' Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti