INLE BENcH/ IN TH ON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT a E H BILASUR (C. G.) P 19 19 / lk 57 / rs Lerer, g chool Bavamohfar‘a , Block Beme’rdm, DisTr'icf— Durg (6.6.) W.P. (5) NO. /201 1 Sdiram Parsebhadre, Aged about So h, Gave’mme yea, Kejuramn Persebadr‘e PITIONER ET VESUS R ESPONDENTS : 1. /Safe of Chhah‘isgar'h Through Secre‘rary, chggl éddéafion Deparfmem .K.S. Bhawan, Raipur‘ (6.6.) Direcfor‘, Public Ins’rr‘ucfion Cha‘lfisgarh Raipur .G. ~ h ' (C) Join'l Direcfor, Treasury, accounfs gnd pension, Durg (C.G.) pisfricf Educa’rion Offier Dur‘g C..) Block Education Officer Bemefara, Di‘s’rricf— Durg (6.6.) WRIT TITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFT CONsTIT‘ulo‘N OF INDIA TICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As menTione in fhe caus Til. d e fe (9 ( i SG cTu Hih S M R + :S ‘ " D c (G PE HE PAR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI$GARH, BILASSPUR SINGLE BENCH- : gON’BLE SHRI PRASHA&T KUMAR M!SHRA, J: WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Appearance? Shri K.S. Pawar, counsel for petitioner. Shri Prasun Bhaduri. Pane! Lawyer far the State. ORAL ORDER ( 28/01/2011) Following oral order of the Court was passed by Prashant Kumar Mishra. J. The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs. 100/-. After completion of his probation period, he was granted regular pay scale. (2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits thatthe issue involved in the case is asto whether; the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date initial appointment or after completion of probation period. (3) The issue inv‘olved. herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal. Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of MP. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to Hon‘ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said petition was r dismissed by the Hon‘ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the i Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to E regular pay scale from date of initial appointment. y (4) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also submits that this court, while considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram & others Vs. i l U W.P.(S) No.499 of 2011 PETITIONER Salikram Parsebhadre. Versus RESPONDENTs State of Chhattisgarh and others. Stafe of Chhattisgarh & ofhers [\N.P. (8) No. 4725/2006] by order dated 01.09.2006, ailowed the petitioners to make a representation along with copy of the petition and annexures within a period of ten days, raising all their grievances and in tum the concerned respondent was directed to decide the representation in an objective manner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the representation. (5) Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation raising all his grievances and in turn. the concerned respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any. in accordance with law. on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. (6) in view of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order asto costs i Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge U