IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14746 of 2006 ARJUN KUMAR & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS For the petitioner :Mr. S.P. Shrivastava, Advocate. For the Respondent :M/S Vinod Kumar(Jc to Sc-I),S.N. Pathak,Advocates. ----------- 3. 6.5.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and the Bihar School Examination Board(hereinafter referred to “as Board. 2. Petitioners are the students of Arya Samaj Primary Teachers Training College Sahugarh, Madhepura for the Session 1987-88 and they appeared in the teachers training examination in the year 1991 conducted by the Board and in support of such fact they have appended the provisional Admit card issued to them by the Board. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that in spite of their appearance in the examination in all the papers, the results have not been published for reasons best known to the authorities of the Board. It is also submitted on their behalf that the institution in question where they prosecuted their studies is the recognized institution. This Court under orders dated 18.7.2007 directed the authorities of the Board to file counter affidavit but the same has not yet been filed, accordingly this matter has been heard without the benefit of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Board. 4. Let the authorities of the Board 2 consider the case of the petitioners for declaration of their result in the light of the orders of this Court dated 22.8.2006 passed in C.W.J.C.No. 5381 of 2004, Annexure-4 and if the institution in question where the petitioners prosecuted their studies was the recognized institution in terms of the instructions of the State Government as also petitioners were within the intake capacity fixed under the order of the Government recognizing the institution then their results be published otherwise in the event the institution was not a recognized institution then the authority will pass appropriate order refusing to declare the result of the institution in question. Orders in compliance of this order should be passed as early as possible, in any case within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. 5. This writ application is, accordingly disposed of. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)