IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8254 of 2011 PRABHASH KUMAR @ BHOLA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 05.04.2011 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Sadar P.S. Case No. 60 of 2010 (Muzaffarpur) registered under Sections 341, 342, 323, 307, 379, & 324/34 of the I.P.C. The petitioner is alleged to have caused Hasuli blow on the informant and also assaulted his brother-in-law. It appears that the injury is 6.5”x ¼” into muscle deep on the junction of left chest. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there was business relationship between the petitioner and the informant and subsequently due to business dispute the present case has been instituted. Considering the nature of injury, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, the learned court-below will consider the regular bail application of the petitioner without being prejudiced to the order of this Court. 2 With the above observation, this application is disposed off. Mkr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)