THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 7454 of 2007 Dated: 12.04.2007 Between: Govindu Krishna. ..... PETITIONER AND The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Pargi Depot, R.R. District, and another. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 7454 of 2007 Order: This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondents-APSRTC in not considering the representations made by the petitioner seeking to pay arrears of salary, provide duty and to enquire into the matter about loss of tickets, as illegal and arbitrary, and consequently to direct the respondents-APSRTC to enquire into the matter and do justice to the petitioner by providing him duty and make payment of arrears of salary. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was terminated from service on certain cash and ticket irregularities, and challenging the said termination orders, the petitioner filed a writ petition before this Court, which was dismissed. Thereafter, he made a representation dated 26.03.2007 requesting the 1st respondent-Depot Manager, to provide him duty and pay other amounts, and it is his contention that so far no orders thereon have been passed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents-APSRTC. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was terminated from service on certain cash and ticket irregularities, and challenging the said termination orders, the petitioner earlier filed a writ petition before this Court, which was dismissed, the fact remains, the affidavit filed by the petitioner in support of the writ petition, neither discloses the number of the writ petition nor the date on which it was dismissed, and whether he preferred any appeal thereagainst, nor is the submission of the petitioner supported by any documentary evidence, such as the order of termination, writ affidavit, copy of the order in the writ petition etc. In the absence of any material produced by the petitioner to substantiate his contention, which in fact, is not pleaded in the writ petition, no relief, much less the relief prayed for by the petitioner in this writ petition can be granted. The writ petition is devoid of merit and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 12.04.2007 Nsr