1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL TRANSFER APPL. No. 35 of 2006 VEERPAL KAUR V/S JAGDEEP SINGH Mr. KISHAN BANSAL, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. AK SINGH, for the respondent Date of Order : 3.7.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the petition for transfer. The allegations in the transfer petition are, that the petitioner has already initiated quite a few litigations in District Hanumangarh, including one under Section 125 Cr.P.C., another under Section 498A and 406 IPC, and yet another under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, and seeks transfer of the petition filed by the husband under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending at Raisinghnagar, on the ground of the Raisinghnagar Court having no jurisdiction to entertain the case, in view of the provisions of Section 19. Then the other ground given is, that other cases are also pending in different Courts at Hanuman Garh. 2 In my view, it is clearly alleged in the application of the husband, on the basis of facts pleaded, that Raisinghnagar Court has jurisdiction, as such, the petitioner can contest that litigation at Raisinghnagar. Then so far as the fact that other litigations are pending at Hanumangarh, is concerned, in my view, that by itself does not entitle the petitioner to have the case, instituted at Raisinghnagar, transferred at Hanumangarh. Thus, I do not find any force in the transfer application. The same is, therefore, dismissed. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/