THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3452 of 2009 Date:23.06.2011 Between: Bandela Bojanna and others ..... Petitioners AND Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Secretary, Hyderabad and others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri K.Subba Rao Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: Government Pleader for Industries and Commerce Counsel for Respondent No.4: Sri V.L.Surendra The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing Memo No.11215/SPIU & SAND/2008-1, dated 11.09.2008 is arbitrary, irrational, discriminatory, illegal and consequently set aside the order of the 3rd respondent in Proceedings No.1615/KG/2007 dated 02.12.2008 and to pass such other appropriate orders….” At the hearing, Sri K. Subba Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.4483 of 2009 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 23rd June, 2011 GHN