RlkJfi! C B.t"s.8< ^ ?•' iltli^. ^^-/cro IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCG) WRIT PETITION fS) N0. ^L/ /20Q7 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER .•••'^•/l^' ^v' <^--'' RESPONDENTS / Nagesh Kumar Rathia (B.T.I.), .•••'^u^ aged about 44 years, son of Shri ^ ^"0 'y'lf'y .•••'' Majhi Ram Rathia, Assistant ^•^"'L..-'"" -~J'". "I"'""'""'_.'^fe^<v Teacher, Government Girls *iTj3^. Teacher, Government Girls *iTj3^- ^f "L--^^ School Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS <t. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Distt. Education Officer, Distt. Ragiarh (CG) 3. Block Education Officer Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh(CG) .?':;":""..'?2'3^' S^3?;;'-*:'S^^^ XI-HC-78 sn^CTwR-ii* (raraiT^r^iiR) S^^TPTRW, ®Tf1tf'is,Ricfiy^< __ t^--f.W^<r-6i'^ *li*iwi sb*iicb •••••••••••••"•..... ^pj" 2007 3ii^?rV^K ('^3^8r) ?TgiwflfgTT3T^?r 1.2.2007 +wr<-t41^ KiKcfTffte'd <hv.K ^sri^rsn^r Mr. ftwijeet Kumar Mcz^mdar, counsel for the petitioners. Ms. Sunita Jain, Pane! Soffvyer for the respondents/Stste. itii the consent of lea|ned counse! for the parties, the mati'ers are heard finally wid disposed of. Common order dictated in W.P. (s) No. 621 of 2007 in open Court, A copy of this order be placed on record in connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge P.T.O. HI6H COURT OF CHH/tTTTSfeSRH^AF BIUSPU8 SIN61E BENCH ; HON'BLE MR. S^TISH K. A6NWOTRI. J. WRTT PETn~roN(s) NO. 621 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Responctents Chintamani Tiwari Stateof Chhatt-isgarh cnd others WRTT PETmON ts) NQ^^ZOF 2QQ7 Petitioner Resoondents versus famari Kamfa Kerketta State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PETmON (s) N0^6210^2007 Petitioner versus Resoondents 5.R. Nirala 5tate of Chhattisgarh and others And WRir PETTTrON (s) |SLQ_624^F 2007 Petjtioner versus Resoondents Nagesh Kumar Rathia State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mazumdar, counsel for the petitioners. Ms. 5unita Jajn, Panel tawyer for the STate/ reqsondenrs, OR D E R (Passed on Ihis Ist February. 2007} 1. Leamed counsel cppear'mg for the petitioners as well as leamed . f'" Penal lawyer appearing for the respondents/Stat®jointly .submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ peti+ion are squarely covered by the decision of this Court- in the case of yasfweHvt Kumar Bhafwdwaj vs. Mwricipal Corpwatim. Ouny tmd aiwthw>'. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of tiie decision of this Court in the matter of yashwanf Kumar BhafvdwaJ(5u^ra}, subject to verification of the fact asto whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T.I. Certificates at •riieir own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further wrfiether tiiey have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be ptacecl on re.cord m connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatisbK.Agmhotri Judge 1 2006CtI)MPJR-C696 Bablu