f“ n. Mgéaiw “Hr-1e. r’ y; IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P; (s) No. azaml‘ / 2010 PETITIONER “‘Radhe Shyarn Das S/o late Jagdeo Das, aged about 69 years, R/o Village Chaveh, Post Khaprikhurd, Tahsil and District Rajnandgaon C.G. VERSUS / RESPONDENTS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh through ' the Secretaly Education Department, DKS Bhawan Raipur C.G. 2. / The Accountant General, Chhattisgarh, Near Bus Stand, Pandri,Raipur) [ 6.é‘;’)/, 3. The District Education Officer,- District Rajnandgaon, Rajnandgaon C.G. xwgaaa ’” WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF 'AN APPROPRIATE 7 WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTIONIORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. MAY'THIS PLEASE TO YOUR LORDSHIP, V The humble petition of the petitioner named above most respectfully showeth: — lfPARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER. As mentioned in the cause title. 7:84 a i IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT ékASPU WRIT PETlTlON (S) N0. 2048 of 201D PETiTiONER : Radhe Shyam Das. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Saiish K. Agnihoix‘i Jr Present: Shri Dashrac'h F’rajapaii, Advocate for the petitioner. Shn‘ ShashankThakur, Panel Lawyer forthe Siate Shri Anand Verma, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 30‘“ day of April: 2010) I. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the case, being payment of retire! benefits matter, may be referred to the pension committee. 2. This Court, in the matter ot WP. No. 4642/2004 (539mm Manda! V. The State of Chhatt/sgam & Others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to constder the matter of rettrai dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The. .Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 13062006 passed in WP. No. 19611’2B06 (Sm: ft’eja Be; Chandra/re; Vs. State Government and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in ivi.C.C. No. 105 of 2008' {Safe of Cirham‘sgam & 0177ers v. Bainazth Manda! and anotnei). Thus, this petition is squareiy covered by the judgment and order dated 315‘ of January, 2608 passed in WP. No. 46422604 5a/]natn Manda! (sup/a) as submitted by teamed counsei appearing for the parties. 3. With the consent of the parties, this petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms Le. the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the, Committee shatl issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concerned, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shaii consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petin‘oner. The petitioner and the ofhcers concerned may fiie additionai documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retire! dues, if any, to the petitioner be compieted within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. The petitioner snail suppiy extra copy of the petition to the teamed counsel appearing for the respondents for fomrarding the same to the l Committee. . Amit Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge f H R