-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3572 OF 2006 In APPEAL (L) NO.683 OF 2006 In NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1034 OF 2005 In SUIT NO.468 OF 1999 Rutvij Chemicals Limited : Appellant (Orig.Defendant No.7) V/s. ICICI Limited & Ors. : Respondents (Orig.Defts.Nos.1 to 6) ... Mr.Sanjay Jain with Mr.Brijesh Upadhyay i/b. M/s.Purnanand & Co., for the appellant. Mr.Durgesh Khanapurkar i/b. M/s.M.K.Ambalal & Co., for respondent no.1. Ms Swati Deshpande i/b. M/s.M.S. Bodhanwala & Co., for respondent no.2. ... CORAM : R.M.LODHA & S.A.BOBDE,JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 17, 2006. P.C. -: 2 :- Heard. 2. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, the delay of four days in filing the appeal is sufficiently explained. 3. We, accordingly, condone the delay in filing the appeal. 4. Office is directed to process the appeal and post it for admission. 5. Notice of Motion stands disposed of. R.M. LODHA, J. S.A. BOBDE, J.