1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2296 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.455 OF 2008 Sarla Vijay Reddy @ Soni .... Applicant Vs. Municipal Corporation for .... Respondents Greater Mumbai. Mr. Bharat Mehta, Advocate for applicant. Mr. J.J. Xavier, Advocate for respondents. Coram : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. Date : 16th June, 2009 P.C. Pursuant to the decree passed in the proceedings, the applicant was directed to demolish her structure by 31st May 2009. The applicant had accordingly submitted an undertaking to this Court on 18th March 2008. By the present application, she seeks extension of time beyond 31st May 2009. The ground on which the extension sought is the applicant’s own health. At paragraph 5 of the application, it is stated that she may be required to be operated for hysterectomy. For that purpose, she relies upon Medical Certificate issued by Dr.Devidas N.Vadgaonkar, Mumbai. The certificate issued is peculiar. It does not categorically state that the applicant is required to undergo the hysterectomy. It states that the applicant may be required hysterectomy, if medical 2 line of treatment fails. Apparently the applicant has been under treatment of Dr.Vadgaonkar atleast since April 2009. The next ground for extension at paragraph 6 is the health of her son. It is stated therein that the son had to be operated for urinary problem. The operation of the son was performed in May 2009. Considering the grounds made by the applicant, following order is passed. O R D E R The applicant is granted extension till 31st August 2009 to remove her structure. (SMT.R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J)