THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.5123 OF 2009 O R D E R: This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioners herein, who are the respondents in A.S.No.24 of 2005 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Bapatla, aggrieved by the order in I.A.No.478 of 2009 in A.S. No.24 of 2005, whereby the learned Senior Civil Judge allowed the application filed under Section 45 of the Evidence Act to send Exs.A1, A2, X1 and X2 to the Government Finger Print Expert, Hyderabad and to get his opinion whether the thumb marks in Exs.X1 and X2 of Patan Barkatulla Khan, who is the vendor of the plaintiff, are identical or not with that of the thumb marks contained in Exs.A1 and A2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the material available on record. The Court below, after taking into consideration several facts and circumstances and also giving detailed reasons, allowed the application. It is not possible for the Court to compare the thumb impressions. Hence, to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and proper adjudication of the matter, it is apt to refer the documents to the Finger Print Expert for comparison. Therefore, I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the impugned order so as to interfere with the same under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The Civil Revision Petition is liable to be dismissed and is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J Dated 30th October, 2009 vrn