IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2010 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 12414 of 2010(B) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- MISS. MAYAMOL.V.K. D/O. K.A.KUNJU, AGED 30 YEARS LECTURER IN SOCIOLOGY, KIRTADS, KOZHIKODE-17, RESIDING AT VALIYAVEETTIL HOUSE, CHELACHUVADU.P.O., CHELACHUVADU, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.PAVITHRAN SRI.M.VIVEK RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. KERALA INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH, TRAINING &DEVELOPMENT STUDIES FOR SCHEDULE CASTES & SCHEDULED TRIBES, CHEVAYUR, KOZHIKODE-17. REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR. 2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SCHEDULE CASTES/SCHEDULE TRIBES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.ANTONY MUKKATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P. (C) No.12414 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T As per Ext.P2, the petitioner was appointed as Lecturer in Sociology in the scale of pay of Rs.11070-18450/-, on a temporary basis, for a period of 180 days. Though Ext.P4 special rules were framed no permanent appointment has been effected otherwise than regularising the service of the provisional employees or contract workers, it is submitted. The petitioner is fully qualified for being appointed as regular basis and she is similarly situated to those appointees under Ext.P5. Among such appointees Sri. V.K. Mohankumar and a few others did not even possess the requisite qualification, it is further submitted. At any rate, according to the petitioners there is no justifiable reason for terminating her service to accommodate another provisional appointee. I am of the view that the second respondent is competent to look in to the grievances raised by petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner is given liberty to approach the Government by filing an appropriate representation raising all her contentions and WPC.12414 of 2010 : 2 : claims within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. In case, such a representation is received, the second respondent shall consider and pass orders thereon expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of such a representation. The petitioner contends that he is still continuing in service on provisional basis. In the said circumstances, there is a further direction to the respondents not to substitute the petitioner by another provisional hand till a decision is taken by the 2nd respondent, as directed above. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge