Q) $m§§§g %nah IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.p.(s.) No. HM 9 /2o11 2)/. The Joint Director Treasury Accounts and Pension Bilaspur Division, ,District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3) /The District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 4) (a Principal, Government Higher Secondary School, Mahapalli, Blcok Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER AIéTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OE WRIT IN [NATURE OE MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OE LIKE NATURE ETC. x\ PETITIONER: Khageshwar Pradhan S/ o Late Shri Palau Ram Pradhan, aged i E about 59 years, Lecturer t \ v (English) at Government Higher \/@Q’\w’/ Secondary School, Mahapalli ot/Xs&0x‘" " $0 N’\ Block Ralgarh, . D1str10t . . Ra1garh . ' 30‘“ 0/ (CG) VERSUS 3)“ RESPONDENTS 1f State of Chhattisgarh ,V » Through : The Secretary, School x Education Department D.K.S. ‘ Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) XI—HC 78 3a WW, @Wnag, W mm,“m 200 i mm,“ 311%!!! m mahowi) T MM.“ -__. mam as:m am Wm mm I112?! 311W wafwfm waft 1% fg‘z'} I‘f‘mgR ‘ % aim m $3.: HGN’BLE MR. JUSTIC§ PRITENKER. DIWAKER 94.08.2011 Shri D.R.Patel, comsal for the petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, P.L. fer the Stats. Grievance: of the ystitionm‘ in the pmssm‘. petition is mat the petitionar was appointeti as Assistant, Tsacher on a §X€d§ pay scaie of RS. 100 for a pen’od 0f two yea-:3 Emxi after compktion‘of probation, he Wem granted regular pay soak 0f Rs. 169—306. (a Cemention of the counsel for the petitionar is that he is antitied far regular pay scab ‘ 11th cffect from the dam of ini‘fial appointme t and his case is quamly covered with number of decisions passed by this C011 and also the judgment rendered by the MP. State Adminietrati e ’I‘ribmlal, Jabalgaur in 0A. No. 2745/89 {Madhukant Yadu 56 Others Vs. State of MP. & Others} where in it has beeo held that similarly pieced {eachers are entitled for iegular pay ecale from the date of their initial appointment. It is not disputed by bot’a the parties that the matter was taken up by the State to the ApeX‘Court but the appeal was also dismissed by the Apex Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/ Assistant Teachers are entitled for regular pay scale from the tiate of their initial appointment. l 3a WW, @a‘mn—g’, W “WWW TF1 zoo §&mww$($$§ng) I. _. WW 'WH 33 fw? (WK kaifaqm mmxmaném - in View of the above subm ssion matie by the. counsal for the parties. the petition is disp Sad of in ths same terms Le. the petitioner is granted liberty ‘0 make a repreSenfah‘on, if so advise<i, in the light of the afone aid judgment and the circular dated 13.1.2009 6r, 1L1.2011 ( nnexure Fifi) and in tum, the concemed respondent is directe to consider their case on its own merits and in its perspe . if the petitioner skaiids 011 the same footing as per der passed by the State Administrative Tn'bunal in M dhukant Yadu (supra) 311d subsequently eoniirmed by the upreme Court in Special Leave Petitioil (Civil) NO. 6892f93 y order dated 03.01.95, the petitioner may be entitled to relief accordingly. It is expected from the S. te authorities to pass suitable order after due scrutiny of the f ts. It is made clear that this court has not expressed axiy opinion on the merits of the csse and the authority concemed would be at liberty to decide the represeutatiozl strictiy in accordance with law. Sd/— Pritinker Diwakar Judge c ' e {r s e