COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH. BILASPUR PETmONER W.P. (U/A227) No.1035 of2010 Himanshu Tripathi, aged about 48 years, S/o Late Ambika Prasad Tripathi, R/o Near House of Ashok Rao, Gondpara, Bilaspur, Tahsil and Dlstrict Bilaspur (CG) RESPONDENTS Versvs 1 Chhattisgarh State Wakf Board, ' Through : Chief Executive Officer, Chhattisgarh State Wakf Board, Raipur(CG) 2 Sub-Divisional Officer, Biiaspur, TahsiS & Di'strict BiJaspur (CG) 3 Chief Executive Officer, Chhattisgarh State Wakf Board, Ralpur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTSTUTIONOFiSNDIA (L . Appearance : .. :- \ Mr.lVlanoj Paranjpe, Counse! for the petltioner. Mr. G.SAgarwal, Senior Advocate with IVIr. K.R.Nair, Counsel for respondent No.l/Chhattisgarh State Wakf Board, Raipur ORAL ORDER (11.03.2010) SUNIL KUIVSARSINHA. J. Heard. Mr. G.S. Agarwal, learned SeniorCounsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 submits that in view of the provisions of sub-section 9 of Section 83 of the Wakf Act, 1995, the writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India would not be maintainabJe, as the order passed by the Tribunal is a revisable order. ^—.-....jM^^sM^iS W.P. (U/A 227) No.103Sof 2010 in view ofthe above objection, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to fi!e a revision. PermissJQngranted. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. The certified copy of the impugned order dated 19.02.2010 shall be returned to the counsel for the petltloner, after retaining a photocopy of the same. (::1'';. Sd/-. J Sunil Kumar sinna ; judge - :L. .'i'l