IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 18566 of 1999 Between: 1 M.Vinodhini Kumari, W/o. Vaman Reddy, Working as Lecturers in Chemistry, R.B.V.R.R.Womens College, Narayanguda, Hyderabad. 2 M.Jyothi, W/o. Sekhar Reddy, Working as Lecturers in Chemistry, R.B.V.R.R.Womens College, Narayanguda, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Director of Collegiate Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Collegiate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad. 4 The Chairman, College Service Commission, Gaganvihar, Nampally, Hyderabad. 5 The Secretary- cum-Correspondent, R.B.V.R.R.College for Women, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned proceedings passed by the 3rd Respondent in his Proceedings No. 1015/PC.3-1/99, dt. 19.5.1999, rejecting the cases of the petitioners for regularization in terms of G.O.Ms.No. 302, Education Department, dt. 23.8.1991 and in the light of the Judgment in W.P.No. 17477/96 dt. 16.8.1996, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional null and void and consequently direct the respondents to issue the orders of absorption/regularization in terms of G.O.Ms.No. 302 Education Department, dt. 23.8.19991 including seniority, U.G.C.Scales, arrears of salary and all consequential benefits attached to the posts; and pass such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deem fit in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.G.DASARADHA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : ORDER: Heard both sides and at their request the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for disposal. Petitioners herein, who have been working as Lecturers, seek to challenge the order dated 19.5.1999 rejecting their request for regularization of service. However, it is now represented that similar such relief was granted to other persons and they have already filed representations on 8.11.2004, 11.11.2004 and 10.12.2004, before the first respondent herein, seeking the relief on par with other employees, who have been claimed and also in terms of instructions issued by the government itself and the said representations are still pending. In view of the same, it is not necessary to go into the merits of this case at this stage and it would suffice in the interest of justice to direct the respondents to dispose of the representations filed by the petitioners. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the representations filed by the petitioners, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving an opportunity and notice to the petitioners. No costs. ____________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J Dated: 15.2.2005 Ka Note: Furnish copy in one week. To 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Director of Collegiate Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Collegiate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad. 4 The Chairman, College Service Commission, Gaganvihar, Nampally, Hyderabad. 5 The Secretary- cum-Correspondent, R.B.V.R.R.College for Women, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad. 6. 2 CCs to G.P. for Higher Education, High Court of A.P, Hyderabad. (OUT) 7. 2CD copies.