/ ./' B^ w ^' IN THE HB3H COURT OP J0S3CATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETI'rION N0. /~i&'^ QS" 2002 EETWEEN Kam-ba Erasad ahariya S/o Shri I&rihaiya Lal ftiariya, aged abou'b 26 years, R/o Vlllage Lotlota, anchayat Chourfcha-bti, Post Gopal Pur, P.s./Tahsil Katghora, Dis-trict Korba. SETITIONER A N D 1. 2. fhe eollector,K&rba,District Korba. Sub Divlsional Officer (Revanue) Katghora, Qistrlct; Korba. 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila EanGhayat. Distrlct Korba . 4. chlef Executi-ve QEficer, Janpad tenehayat ,Katghora,Dlstrict Korba. .0,^^ ,-<r ;*.&-¥-^.."rf 7J7- ....'-^^!*i '• " " '-'/>. tltf ^1"' 'c sl "' •-'-. •• '•' ^^w^^-::--' ^•^r' dai'* RESPONDSNTS ..<-'' WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLES 22^227 O? THE CONSTITOTieSt QF INDIA rniTli;';if 1^,-it^ ?;i*f^i=?) Ixig- Isssfc r^ ^rqT^-q, ^tw'fs, TsfCTrey ^^±..^.:..^.^^.. '?^JT^ff ^T^i 3^T? PTiWff-* TiTERtt c' TSt£;TfSRd 07-10-200a 1 Shri Prashant Mishra, coujisd for the petjtiouer. Shri Raabir Singh, Govt. Apv. for the State. In vie'w of the limited nat^ire of gnevance raised, which is for a dirccdon to fhe respondent No.^- Sub Dirisional Officer (Revenue) to consider and take an apprcjpriate declsion on fhe petitioner's icpresentations, copy whcreof isj axuicxujc P-8 to thc writ pctition, no usefiil purposc would bc served ip. kecping this writ pctition pending, as it can be disposed of at the ^dnussion stage with aa appropriate drrection. i Accordit^ to the petition^r, vide order Aiuiexure P-1 he was appoiated as Paachayat Karmi ^br Gram. Panchayat Chorbhatti, Tahsil Kathghora Distt. Korba. His grjevance is to the onler Anaexure P-3 whereby one Dev Charan Marqbi who was Grata Sahayak, Janpad Paachayat, Kaft^hora has beaji ^ked to take temporaiy chaiy of ofi&ce of Gram Paachayat Chorbl^atd, TahsU Kathghora Distt. Korba aad fhc petitioner has been asked td hand-over the charge to the said Dev Charau Marabi. It is alleged byj the petitiouer fhat order is bad in law aud has been passed without holdit^ any enqiiuy and without ~WW?11- '$S<3!ei» ^'a^KiRT1!, ®rfRFiS,|s|"1l-M: .sr'j.:P::.&/.ti.:.Mss.ls..^.. .It. '^' --^ f', 'Wl 200 w f^&l 3WR;?'fe;fe 1 TOTOWNsi)^ . 1 TORNRTiwn^i^Ti^TC T;im silt?; STqfe? 1 ^..,„.,......-,.^,. - 1-j ^atRTqsii^i 'assignSg-any-reasoBT AggnevedT'tITercwiiE tBe^petitioner has subinitted itf 1^-- } Roshaa representation to respondent N42 on 19-02-2001 but siace no action has been takea thereou he has at)proached tttis Court for relief. In view of the prayer in|ad.e, this petition is disposed of by directing the respondent No.2 tp take au appropriate decision on the petitioner's representation withlal a period of foiir weeks fioin the date of receipt / conununication of the cirder. It is madc clear fhat the Coiut is i not cxpressing any opiiiion on fl^c incrits of thc pctitioncr contention or his claim and tfaat the repres^utatk»n is to be decided by the said respondent No.2 on its own BieUt aad ia accordance with the law or stetutoiy provision govemiag-theEfited. Wifh the above dn-ectiot., the petitun stends disposed of. Consequenfty, I.A. No. 1136/20(p2 & 6527/2002 also stands disposed of. j Certified copy as pcr rules. j P.C NAIK Judge <J U L> t»t'<