3/ C7,? try” Q7 3m$iE EENCH ’ ‘ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETIJION (C) No. $ (T O /2o11 w” PETITIONER : Lakshya Infrastructure, Through - Its Director- Sunil Sultaniya, S/o LateHariram Sultaniya, R/o- 2— Redcross place First Floor, Depa rtment of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) /, 2. The Collector, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) ' 3. The Sub Registrar of Registration, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Santram Rathiya, 5/0. Shri Subran Rathiya, aged about 49 years, R/o. Viilage Mauhapaii, Tahsii : Kharsiya, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA ( ” grhuc" xx ................ Q‘Q‘S § ?” x6 Kolkatta(W.B.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS / 1. State of Chhatusgarh, . through- the secretary, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO.87O OF 2011 PETITIONER Lakshya Infrastructure ml MWW“ ”ml Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of tndia) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Amit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER (Passed on this 1mm October, 201 1) “ 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner j§ submits that the petitioner does' not want to press other reliefs except that the application dated 29-11—2010 (Annexure — P/3) pending E}; before the Collector, Raigarh, be considered and decided, as I“ expeditiously as possible. 2i At this juncture. learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the abovestated application shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits, within a period of four weeks. 3. ln view of-the above, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. l Sd/-' y i Gowri Satish K. Agnihotri Judge