(A/ @CD /" (F ‘ \GG PR ETITIONE / ‘ x VERSUS 1. The Regional Transport Authority Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Secretary Regional Transport Authority Bilaspur (C.G.) /., WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ? Xl.HC-78 Immam' weQlwm‘ 1’ / .mmww'm ~ v mama“ ammam ‘ 10.3.2605 WP. N6. 1253/2006 Shri F.5.Khare, counsel ‘5 Shri Vashwan‘i’ Singh, 5c Heard. This i3 a pefi‘l‘ion fE or 'i'he pefifione‘rv vernmen‘r Advecafe for The 5mm. led under AWicie 22é/227 of fhe Cons'i'iw'rion 9f India far "me imitied reiief 'i'ha'i 'ihe appiicai'ion filed befare The Regicna! Transpw-T Au‘fhori‘fy, Raipur (Annexure P—3) shouid ba direcfed fa be dispc sec! of as fhe R.T.A. is noT disposing 0f We aferescid applicafien, whim was filed by The pafificmer as back as 0n 4.6.2005. On ihe argumenfs also, learned counsel for ihe petitioner makes The sama prayer and Sui: mifs 'i'haj? This pei'ifien may be dispased of wh‘h a direcfion ‘io The RT. . To decide his applicaTion, Annexure P- 3 wiThir. The sTipulaTed period rariTed by This CourT. opposed by The counse! for Th SToTe. The same is silowed. ‘ ET is direcTed ThaT ifTheopplicaTion filed by The peTiTioner vide Annexure 9-3 on 4.62005 h respondeni No.1 in The gresen'r case This prayer made by la s na'i been disposed of so far, The concerned au'ihori'iy, which is e rned‘counsel for ihe pefiiioner is no? ’ ipwa‘ 1253 20/06 . Qt r .................................. l , mean memesiaaa) ma'Rwaanéa Xl-HC-78 - W$ £1200 mamw - WWW _' mawmm r mm§wm’ $Wanéa in acsordance wi‘Fn law as early 0f 2 mon'fhs frem The dm'e 9f arder befare him. ‘Wifhgu-fhe afarescid sbsarva‘l’ionS, The pefi‘l’ion S'mnds fina!!y dispnsed of. Sd/— Car-fified copy as per" rule w ’accordmg ‘y'o The comsei for fhé pefifioner, Sha“ dispose 9f +he same Is possible preferabiy wifhin a period produciion 5f certified copy of ihis Sunil Kumar Sinha l ‘ Judge L z i. - WM0’25’E/ZOM anésrdaai(We ‘ ’ ) /2 ‘7