IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6327 of 2000 Between: K.Bhaskar Reddy, son of Thimma Reddy, Village Adminstrative Officer, Kalichetla Village, Peapully Mandal, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Secretary for Revenue Department , Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner of Land Revenue, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The Disrtict Collector, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 4 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 5 Ediga Sreekrishna Devarayalu, son of Late E.Ramamurthy, R/o Peddapodilla (Village, Peapully Mandal, Kurnool District. 6 The Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tibunal, Rep. by its Registrar, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari by calling for the records relating to the orders passed by the Commissioner of Land Revenue, Govt. of AP., Hyderabad in his proceedings No. A1/344/93, dt. 3/10/1994 and as confirmed by the 1st Respondent in Memo.No.72492/Vo-2/94, dt. 4/09/1995 and as confirmed in OA.No.5593/95 dt. 4/02/2000 by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, and set aside the same by holding it as illegal and against to the A.P. Village Administrative Officers Service Rules, 1990 and consequently direct the respondents to continue to the petitioner as Village Administrative Officer of Kalichetla Village, Dhone Mandal, Kurnool District. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.D.KODANDARAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6327 of 2000 ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Eswaraiah) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous and the order of status quo passed by this Court on 18.04.2000 stands vacated. No order as to costs. ________________ V. ESWARAIAH , J 17th July, 2009 ___________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J GHN