IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION P.I.L. No. 80 of 2006 1. Kabir Yunus Katmale and others ..Petitioners vs. 1. The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents Shri S.M.Gorwadkar for petitioners. Shri V.P.Malvankar, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2 Shri R.V.Govilkar with Smt.Rutuja Ambekar for respondent no.3. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR C.J. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR C.J. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR C.J. AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. J. J. 27th June, 2007 27th June, 2007 27th June, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The learned Counsel appearing for the respondents submit that the crane in question has already been removed. Even the penalty imposed upon the defaulter has been recovered. The learned Counsel further states that if there is any unauthorised sand extraction work the Govt. will take steps to remove the same. In view of the statement made the petition is rendered infructuous and is accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs. (CHIEF JUSTICE) (CHIEF JUSTICE) (CHIEF JUSTICE) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)