IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9323 of 2011 RAJ KUMAR SAO @ RAJ KUMAR GUPTA AND ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.04.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion of the petition. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149,447, 448, 384,323, 380, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(x) of the S.C./S.T.(Prevention of Atrocities)Act. The accusation is of demand of extortion of Rs.200/- and on refusal accused went into the house of the informant, committed theft of valuable articles and abused the informant by calling his caste’s name. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that much prior to the occurrence the petitioners’ side lodged a case against the informant’s side hence, the offence under 2 S.C./S.T.(Prevention of Atrocities)Act is not made out. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners, Raj Kumar Sao @ Raj Kumar Gupta, Sanjal Sao @ Sanjal Gupta @ Sanjay Kumar Gupta, Masudan Sao @ Masudan Gupta and Somnath Gupta, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Patna S.C./S.T.(Harizan)P.S. Case No. 14 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Danapur, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)