1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1412 OF 2008 Seva Vikas Coop.Bank Ltd. & Anr.. Petitioners Versus MRB Roadconst Pvt.Ltd. & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.R.S.Ghatge i/b. A.S.Desai for petitioners Mr.P.S.Dani for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 7th March 2008 P.C. . Mr.Dani appearing for original revision applicants who are impleaded as respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to this petition states that due compliance has been made with the requirements stipulated in section 154(2A) of the Maharashtra Coop.Societies Act, 1960. Further, he states that the immovable and immovable property of these respondents has been handed over by the petitioner bank to another coop.bank viz., Rupee 2 Coop.Bank. Therefore, there is no basis for challenging the impugned order. 2. Be that as it may, the application filed before the Divisional Joint Registrar, C.S.Pune by the above respondents challenges the recovery certificate issued under section 101 and irrespective of what has been directed at an interlocutory stage, the Divisional Joint Registrar must decide this revision application, if at all the same can be decided on its merits afresh. 3. Mr.Ghatge appears for petitioners and informs me that the revision application itself is time barred and there was no application for condonation of delay. If the certificate is dated 11th May 2006 and the Revision Application is filed belatedly i.e. on 1st November 2007, then, needless to state that the revisional applicants will have to satisfy the revisional 3 authority as to how the delay in filing said revision application can be condoned and that there is sufficient cause for the same. 4. The Revisional Authority, therefore, is directed to first decide the application for condonation of delay and, thereafter, if there is any favourable order thereon, proceed to pass such orders as are permissible in law, after hearing both sides on the main revision application. 5. All contentions with regard to both applications are kept open, with no opinion being expressed thereon. Petition disposed of. 6. Parties to appear before Divisional Joint Registrar on 24th March 2008 and application for condonation of delay be taken up and decided within two weeks from the date of appearance. 4 (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)