1 wp-10643-09.sxw dgm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10643 OF 2009 Ramesh Ranabhai Patel & anr. .... Petitioners vs Standard Chartered Bank & anr. .... Respondents Mr. Nitin A. Ghawre with Mr. Anil Kadam for the petitioners. Mr. Prasad Das i/by M/s.Goenka Law Associates for respondent no.1. CORAM: P. B. MAJMUDAR, & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 5th October, 2010 P.C.: Since the petitioners have adequate alternative remedy to approach DRT, in our view, this petition is not required to be entertained at this stage. 2 The learned counsel for the petitioners is willing to withdraw this petition so as to enable his clients to approach DRT. 3 The learned counsel for the respondent no.1-Bank states that the Bank has already taken symbolic possession, but physical possession is not yet taken. He makes statement that for a period of three weeks from today, physical possession will not be taken as there is an interim order prevailing since 19.12.2009. 4 Considering the said fact and since there is no opposition as such from the side of the respondent no.1/Bank to the effect that the petitioners will not be physically evicted from the premises for a period of three weeks from today, we 2 wp-10643-09.sxw direct the Bank to maintain status-quo prevailing as on today for a period of three weeks from today. 5 The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the above observation. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) ( P. B. MAJMUDAR, J.)