IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 3RD NOVEMBER 2011 / 12TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 28432 of 2011(D) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ RAMANKUTTY, S/O. BALAN, AGED 55 YEARS, PARAYANPALLAM, MUTHALAMADA- II VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 001. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MUTHALAMADA- II VILLAGE, MUTHALAMADA, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 001. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD - 678 101. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.M.J. RAJASHREE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/11/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 28432 of 2011(D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT-P1- TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTERED SALE DEED NO. 1631/85 ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT-P2- TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT-P3- TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2N RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT-P4- TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 07/09/2011 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 28432 of 2011 D ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Grievance of the petitioner is regarding the alleged denial of the second respondent to accept basic tax and issuance of possession certificate in respect of 78 cents of land in R.S.No.474/4 and 475/K/4 of Muthalamada-II village. According to the petitioner, on the refusal of the second respondent to accept tax, he has filed Ext.P4 representation to the first respondent and that even to Ext.P4, there has not been any response. It is in these circumstances, this writ petition has been filed. 2. In my view, if the first respondent considers Ext.P4 and pass appropriate orders in the matter, that should redress the grievance of the petitioner. Therefore, I direct the first respondent to pass orders on Ext.P4 within four weeks from the date of production of a copy of this W.P.(C) No.28432/2011 : 2 : judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/03/11 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge