IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.436 of 2006 M/S BHAGWATI COKE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the petitioners : M/s.S.D.Sanjay & Sushila Agrawal, and Akash Chaturvedi,Advocates For the respondent no.2 : Mr. Dhruv Mukherjee, Advocate For the respondent no.3 : Mr. V.M.K.Sinha, Advocate ------- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ------ Dated, the 22nd September, 2008 We heard the counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for the respondent nos.2 and 3. 2. In our view, the following order will meet the ends of justice: (i) The advocate for the respondent no.3, shall furnish the list of deficiencies with full details which the respondent no.3 want the petitioners to be made up. The said details shall be furnished by the advocate for the respondent no.3 to the advocate for the petitioners as early as possible and in no case later than four weeks from today. Any delay on the part of respondent no.3 in not furnishing list of deficiencies may lead to an inference that respondent no.3 is not desirous of complying with this court’s order. (ii) The petitioners shall then make up deficiencies as - 2 - pointed out by the respondent no.3 and submit dully filled up forms, including form ‘Ga’. (iii) Upon submission resubmission of the duly filled up forms by the petitioners, the respondent no.3 shall ensure that the payment of refund of amount is made to the petitioners at the earliest and in no case later than four weeks from the date of receipt of the duly filled up forms. 3. Contempt application (MJC) stands disposed of accordingly. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J. Sunil