1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.06.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P(MD)No.6418 of 2011 Murugan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manamadurai Taluk, Sivagangai District. 3.The Inspector of Police (L & O), Thiruppuvanam Police Station, Manamadurai Taluk, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the third respondent not to interfere the civil dispute in Survey No.27/8 to the extent of 52 cents on the file of Sottathatti Village, Thiruppuvanam Union, Sivagangai District on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 24.05.2011 and to pass such further or other orders. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Udhayakumar For Respondents : Mr.P.Kandasamy Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R This Petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the third respondent not to interfere the civil dispute in Survey No.27/8 to the extent of 52 cents on the file of Sottathatti Village, Thiruppuvanam Union, Sivagangai District on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 24.05.2011. 2. Heard Mr.R.Udhayakumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Kandasamy, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the third respondent police is interfering with the civil dispute in between the petitioner and the brothers and father in partitioning the property and the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 third respondent police may be directed not to interfere in the civil dispute of the petitioner and his family members. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit in his argument that the respondent police has not interfered in the civil dispute or any dispute of civil nature in between the petitioner and his family members and they would not do so in future also. 5. Recording the said submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), this Court is inclined to direct the third respondent police not to interfere in the civil dispute of the petitioner and his family members or any other dispute, if there is no criminality is attached. 6. With the above direction, this Petition is ordered. Sd/- Vacation Officer/ Assitant Registrar(P&A) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manamadurai Taluk, Sivagangai District. 3.The Inspector of Police (L & O), Thiruppuvanam Police Station, Manamadurai Taluk, Sivagangai District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Smn rl/5c – 7.6.201 Crl.O.P(MD)No.6418 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/