1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 338 OF 2011. Mr. Anurag Prakash Asre .vs. The Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur & another Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. R.P. Dixit, Advocate for petitioner, Mr. N.S. Khubalkar, A.P.P. for respondents. CORAM : MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATED : JULY 8, 2011. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for respondents. The petitioner has preferred an application for parole on the ground of illness of his father. The said application for parole came to be rejected. Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for parole, he has preferred the present petition. The application for parole was rejected on the ground that there is a danger to the life of the family of the deceased and also on the ground that the surety is incapable of keeping a check on the petitioner. In addition, 2 the learned A.P.P. pointed out that it is the case of the petitioner that he is the only person in the family who is capable of taking care of his father, whereas enquiry shows that the petitioner has two brothers and these brothers are capable of taking care of their father. Moreover, we have perused the medical certificate. The medical certificate does not show that the illness of the father is serious as he has not been advised any surgery and the certificate only states that he needs rest for two months. Looking to these facts, we are not inclined to interfere with the order rejecting the application for parole. The petition is dismissed. JUDGE. JUDGE. J.