$éngla @mh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 2%?) w. P. (S) No. "\ OF 201 1. /. PETITIONER : Jagdish Prasad Soni, S/o. late Shri Jeevan Lal Soni, aged about 39 years, Upper Division Teacher, Uchch Primary School Dadargarh, Block Keshkal, District Bastar at Jagdalpur (C.G.) V E R S U S 1M RESPONDENTS :1. ”State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2. W Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jagdalpur, District‘Bastar at {aw Jagdalpur (C.G.) 3. ”’"Block Education Officer, Keshkal, District Bastar at Jagdalpur (C.G.) 41/ Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension, Keshkal, District Bastar at Jagdalpur (C.G.) V”, 5. Joint Director, Treasury Account and Pension, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar at Jagdalpur (C. G.) @ WWW 3.3.: HON’BLE MR. JUSTIC. 03.08.2011 Shli Somkant Vmma, < Shn' N.Naha Roy, P.L. 1 Counsel for the petitic entitled to benem of two adV‘ having passsd B.’I‘.l. examid appoingnent at his own co involved in tho present petin‘ same has been iinally decide the case of Asha Saxena (IInMPJR (SC) 59. It is further submitte that this Court has also taken a similar View in its order dat d 6.22009 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6257/2008. Counsel for th petitioners further submits that the order dated 29.4.20 WW wm $aimm E PRITINKER DIWAKER R :ounsel for the peu‘tioner. for the State. iner submits that the pen’tioner is ance incmments ou account of he ation in the year 1992 before his 3t. It is submitted that the issue on is no longer res integra and the i by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in " s. State omvm. 35 ms. 2009 passed in Wn’t Appeal NO. 124/2009, wherein relying pon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Asha S ena (supra) and the order passed by this Court in another W 't Appeal No. 87/2009, direcu'ons have been issued for consid ration of the case for grant of two aévance increments as per imular dated 21.9.1974 issued by the State of Madhya Prad sh, after verihcation of the facts pleaded in the petition. Counsel for the State ubmits that case of the petitioner would also be considered on the same lines. XI-HC—78 mm @ In zoo mm (Wu) mmm petition is disposed of with a. In vitw of above, the direction to the respondent authorities to decide the claim of The petitioner for grant of two advance increments as per circular dated 21.9.1974 is‘sued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after verification of iihe facts pleaded in the petition within a period of four months It is made clear that th opinion on merits of the ca: would be at liberty to decide with law. WW‘i‘wm animaném WWW wmm mm today. is Court has not expressed any .e and the authority concerned the same strictly in accordance Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge