1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.159 OF 2010 (Trimbak s/o Haribhau Tarte Vs. The State of Maharashtra) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. Girish K.Thigale, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr.V.D.Godbharle, APP for State. ... CORAM: A.H.JOSHI, J. DATE:11/10/2011 1. By this petition the petitioner is challenging the leave granted by the trial Court, permitting re-examination of the prosecution witness. 2. What is urged before this Court is: "The propriety of permitting re-examination". For supporting his contention learned Advocate for the petitioner has relied upon para no.12 of the examination-in-chief, which is perused. 3. While the witness is being examined, it is the best judgment of the Presiding Officer, as to whether re-examination 2 should be allowed, which would prevail and it has been done by him. 4. In so far as worthiness of the version which would emerge from the re- examination is always subject to: (i) Evaluation upon the cross examination. (ii) Final decision of the learned Presiding Officer as to worthiness and credit of such person. 5. In view of this, the leave to re- examine need not be interfered with. 6. Petition is accordingly disposed of. 7. Interim relief vacated. (A.H.JOSHI) JUDGE ... agp/159-10crwp