IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2009 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 30054 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- PONNAMMA PAPPY, AGED 65 YEARS,W/O.LATE PAPPY, LOURDEPURAM HOUSE,KOMMALLOOR P.O., KARIMULAKAL. BY ADV. SRI. K.SHAJ SRI.L.RAJ MOHAN SRI.SAJJU.S RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NOORANAD POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 3. JACOB OOMMEN, ALLUMMOOTTIL PRAKASH VILLA, KOLLAKADAVU P.O. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P(C)No.30054/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1. TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT GIVEN BY PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2. TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. / TRUE COPY / P.S.TO JUDGE KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C)No.30054 of 2009 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of December, 2009 JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. Petitioner approached this court seeking police protection against her son-in-law, the 3rd respondent. Finding that there is essentially a matrimonial dispute between the daughter of the petitioner and the 3rd respondent, we directed the parties to be present before this court. Having interacted with the parties we have also referred them to a qualified Psychologist. We find that in view of the pendency of various cases between the parties before the Family Court and before the Magistrate Court, Chengannoor, we think it proper to relegate the parties to pursue those litigations since reconciliation at this stage seems to be a remote possibility. Therefore, the interim order dated 28-10- 2009 is recalled. The Family Court, Alappuzha, Additional District Court, I, Mavelikkara, JFCM, Chengannoor are directed to proceed with the cases referred to in the order dated 28-10-2009 in accordance with law. The 3rd respondent who is present before W.P(C)No.30054 of 2009 -:2:- us, submits that he has not caused any threat or inconvenience or physical disturbance to the petitioner. It is also submitted that he has no intention to do any such things. The above submissions are recorded. In the unlikely event of any such act on the part of the 3rd respondent, it will be open to the petitioner to seek the assistance of respondents 1 and 2. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) (C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) ahg. KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. --------------------------- W.P(C)No.30054 of 2009 ---------------------------- JUDGMENT 1st December, 2009