1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.1971 OF 1999. Kisan S/o Annarao Pujari ... Petitioner. Versus The Union of India and others. ... Respondents. ... Mr.V.G.Sakolkar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Alok Sharma, Asstt.Solicitor General of India for the Union of India. Mr.N.B.Patil, Asstt.Govt. Pleader for the State. Mr.B.B.Kulkarni, advocate for the Respondent No. 2. ... CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 02.08.2010. ORAL ORDER (Per B.R.Gavai,J.) 1. The petitioner claims for grant of benefit under the Freedom Fighters Scheme under the Central Government. According to the 2 petitioner, he is getting pension under the scheme framed by the State Government and as such he ought to have been granted the pension under the Central Government Scheme also. 2. Mr.Sakolkar, learned counsel submits that petitioner is getting pension under the State Government Scheme, there is no reason as to why he has denied the pension under the Central Government Scheme. Mr.Alok Sharma, learned Asstt.Solicitor General for Union of India, submits that petitioner has failed to produce any documents to substantiate his claim. His claim is rightly rejected. The Apex Court in "Union of India Vs. Avtar Singh" (2006) 6 Supreme Court Cases 493, has held that unless petitioner satisfies the conditions stipulated under the Scheme, he can not be granted benefit of the pension. Since the petitioner has failed to comply with the conditions stipulated, no case is made out for interference. Dismissed. Rule discharged. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (B.R.GAVAI,J.) asp/office/wp1971.99