mm §gm§m ©@ - é f BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 'x w.P. (C) No. 446% 12009 / Manmohan AgrawaL T S/o Late Phool Chand Agrawal, Aged about 52 years, R/o Shri Shyamji Rice Mill, Sadar Road, Navapara, P.S. Gobra Navapara, District Raipur (C.G.) Petitioner State of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate, District Raipur (CG) Chhattisgarh State Power ' Distribution Company Limited Through its Managing Director, Daganiya, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Superintendent Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Gudhiyari, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Senior Accounts ofiioer, Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, , Gudhiyari, Raipur, H District Raipur (C.GL) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF’ INDIA 1) PARTICULARS OF PETIONERS: As mentioned in the cause title above. t 2) PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: As mentioned in the cause title above. \ \ Versus TI HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIsGARH : BILASPUR VV 1Feu oniC)No.44osof2oo9 Manmohan Agrawal, S/o Late Phool Chand Agrawal, ’ aged about 52 years, R/o Shn‘ Shyamji RIC6.Mill, Sadar Road, Navapara, RS. Gobra Navapara, District Raipur (C.G.) Pstitioner Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh, thmugh Distn‘ct Magistrate, District Raipur (C.G.) Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution omny me thrugh t Mana Dto Dagaa, aur stict lpu (C G) uene Ener, Chhatsg ate Pwe Dso Com e G, pur, lstct Rai (C.G.) Snr ccous hha Se e Diio Opa ited u stt ) Cpa Liitd o is ging uecr my Rlp, Dir Rar Spnntednt gme narh St or imbuttn pany Lmntd udhlyan Rai Dli pur eio Ant Of&cer, Cttisgarh tat Powr strbutin omny' Llm, Gdmyan Raipur Dlnc Raipur (C G Peton d r f the Consuon of In) S le Sash K. Agt J Sh vastava, emor Avat Sh a a dvote te eone Sh lo Bal ov Adocae f rsponent orl. ' il twani, vote or podes N o 4 (Pa o t 17 day fAugst, 209 Herd. Sh' ‘Suni O‘ n l twani, lrn g r he respndents No. o 4 submits that e appea uner e provisons ectio 7 of the Eci Act, 200, peg before the appellate authority, has been disposed of on 3.8.2009 and the same has been communicated to the petitioner by letter No. 10—20/ Establishment] 3775 dated 3.8.2009. a r eaed counsel appearin fo t o 2 t th l d th i of Sn 12 letricty 3 ndin In View of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. ‘ The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satlsh K Agnlhotrl Judge CE (Writ tlt uner Aticle 226 o titn dla (B. Hon’b Shn n mhom .) m Manmdra Shn S doce With n Kshif Shkeel Aca for h pnur n Ak ksh, Gt. vt or the ed N Shn Sun O Adca f the resnnt o. 2 t ; o R D E R (oral) ssed n his th ou 0) “1