FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3438 OF 2011 In APPLN/507/2011 SUREKHA EKNATHRAO AWAD VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA AND ANR ... Advocate for Petitioner(s) : Mr. Thigale Girish K. APP for Respondent(s): Mrs. R.K.Ladda for R-1. Mr. Swapnil Patnoorkar advocate for R-2. ... CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. Dated: September 19, 2011 ... 1. Heard learned respective counsel for the parties. 2. This is an application preferred by the applicant wife seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent No.2 in Criminal Application No.507/2011 on 15.2.2011 by this Court. Copy of order is annexed at Exh.'B' page 15. 3. However, it is submitted that parties have settled the matter between themselves and the applicant as well as respondent No.2 filed joint affidavit and same is taken on record. Both the applicant and respondent No.2 are present in the Court and they have admitted the contents and their respective signatures thereon. Said affidavit is taken on record and marked as document 'X'. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders 4. Said affidavit recites that, both the applicant and respondent No.2 undertook to stay together with no any complaint of each other. Respondent No.2 also assured to give half of monthly salary to the applicant as well as to the two daughters namely Gargi and Kadambari towards the maintenance directly to the applicant or in the account of applicant in the Bank of Maharashtra, Cidco Branch, Aurangabad, as respondent No.2 had been transferred to Pune. Said affidavit further discloses that with this undertaking of good behaviour given by the applicant as well as respondent No.2, the applicant, therefore, withdraws application for cancellation of anticipatory bail. 5. In the light of the contents of the aforesaid affidavit, and settlement between the parties, since they are wife and husband each other, Mr. G.K.Naik Thigale, advocate for applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw present application. 6. In view of said submission, leave granted and present application stands dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. ( SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. ) aaa/- ***