HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 1415 OF 2008 Dated 4TH February, 2008 Between Pediripati Yadaiah …Petitioner and SHO, PS, Shamshabad, at Shamshabad, RR District, and anr. …Respondents. THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 1415 of 2008 ORDER: In this Writ Petition, the petitioner seeks Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the first respondent in harassing him by calling to Police Station at the instance of the second respondent as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner claims to be the owner and possessor of the agricultural land covered by Sy.Nos. 147/E, 147/AA/AA and 148/AA, totally admeasuring Ac.1.00 Gts, situated in Tondpally village,Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, having purchased the same from its previous owner, by name, Sri Polapally Hanumayya, Polapally Kistaiah and ors. It is submitted that the petitioner sold the said land to the second respondent to meet his financial necessities and executed registered document No.367/2004, dated 29-1-2004 and handed-over the physical possession to the second respondent. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the same is a outright sale, but, however, as the market value of the said land went down, at the instance of the second respondent, the first respondent is interfering with the civil disputes and coercing him to settle the dispute with the second respondent. When the matter had come up on the last occasion, the same was adjourned to enable the learned Government Pleader to get instructions. Today, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader and Sri Sharad Sanghi, learned Counel, who took notice on behalf of the second respondent, that the petitioner cheated the second respondent by selling the land, which did not belong to him. It is submitted that the petitioner himself fenced the above said land, which is a Government land and by showing the same as his land, he sold to the second respondent by executing sale deed and thus cheated the second respondent. As such, the second respondent filed a complaint before the first respondent, which is registered as Crime No.31 of 2008. In this Writ Petition, the issue as to whether the land sold by the first respondent to the second respondent is his own land or belonged to the government, cannot be adjudicated. But, however, pursuant to a complaint filed by the second respondent, Crime No. 31 of 2008 is registered against the petitioner for the alleged offences under Sections 420 and 506 IPC. In that view of the matter, it cannot be said that there is interference by the first respondent at the instance of the second respondent. Therefore, no direction as prayed for in the Writ Petition can be granted. Leaving open to the first respondent to proceed with investigation in Crime No. 31 of 2008 in accordance with law and file final report, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. ---------------------------------- JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY DATE: 4-2-2008. Msnr.