IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1494 of 2006 OM PRAKASH SINGH Versus RAM AUTAR SINGH & ORS ----------- 2 25.07.2008 No one appears for the petitioner. This Court would not find any error in the impugned order wherein it has been held that the suit was not barred by res-judicata. The finding of the Court below is based on appraisal of materials on record including the judgment in Title Partition Suit No. 327 of 1958 as also the clear observation made by the High Court in appeal that the decree will not be binding on Raghunath Singh or his heirs. That being the position on facts, this Court would not find any error in the impugned order. Accordingly, this application being devoid of merit is hereby dismissed. BCJ (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)