1 srk IN THE HIGH COUT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 99 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 118 OF 2009 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER 99 OF 2008 Yeshwant Ratan Patil & Ors. .. Appellants vs Indubai Kisanrao Nandgude & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. A.Y. Sakhare Sr. Advocate i/b M/s YKS Legal for Appellants. Mr. P.G. Chavan, Advocate for Respondents. CORAM: R.S.MOHITE, J DATE: 9th September, 2009. P.C. 1 After hearing advocate for the parties, it is possible to dispose off the appeal at the stage of admission. Hence, Admit. Both the sides are heard. 2 The appeal is filed by the original defendant No.2 to 4 impugning an order dated 23rd October, 2008 passed below Exhibit No.5 in a suit filed by the plaintiff. It is seen that both the parties are contending that they are in possession of the suit lands which are 07 Ares out of Survey No. 22, Hissa No. 1+3/1/A, structure “A” situated Pimple Nilakh. 2 3 Notwithstanding the fact that there is dispute relating to the actual possession, both parties agree that status-quo will be maintained on the land, since it is vacant and fallow. Both the parties are therefore directed to maintain status-quo till the disposal of the suit. It is agreed that there is a shed ad- measuring 10 feet x 10 feet on the said land. The statements made by the parties are accepted and the Appeal is disposed off with aforesaid direction. 3 As the Appeal from Order is disposed off, Civil Application is also disposed off as it does not survive. Judge.