1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.4926 OF 2004 Union of India .. Petitioner v/s. 1. M/s. Krishna Filaments Ltd. & anr. .. Respondents Mr.R.V.Desai, senior counsel with Mr.H.V.Mehta and Mr.Y.R.Mishra i/by Mr.T.C.Kaushik for petitioner. Mr.V.M.Doiphode with Mr.P.Balakram and Mr.S.S.Mishra i/by Mr.V.A.Doiphode & Co.for respondents. CORAM : R.M.LODHA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24th September, 2004 P.C. Heard. 2. The revisional authority held that as per the report of the Divisional Officer, there was no likelihood of any revenue loss on account of the fact that the finished goods were fully exempted irrespective of whether these were cleared for home consumption or for export. The revisional authority also held that the greater interest of exports would not be averse to grant post facto approval/permission by condoning the lapses. 3. In the backdrop of these findings of the revisional authority, we are satisfied that no case for interference in extraordinary jurisdiction is made out. 2 4. Writ petition is dismissed in limine. (R.M.LODHA, (R.M.LODHA, (R.M.LODHA, J.) J.) J.) (J.P. (J.P. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) DEVADHAR, J.) DEVADHAR, J.)