1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3169 OF 2009 Mohammed Farooque Amin Ansar through his Constituted Attorney Mr.Tansukhkumar Jayantilal Jain. ..Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and 3 others. ..Respondents. ... Mr.Deepak A. Poonamiya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.V.S. Gokhale, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 3. ... CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : 10th JUNE, 2009. P.C. :- 1. The petitioner is a land owner of the land in which the proceedings were going on under Urban Land Ceiling Act. When the act was repealed, according to the petitioner the possession had not been taken. Only a notice under Section 10(1) & 10(3) had been given. This position is accepted by the respondent as well in the counter affidavit. 2. In view of the fact that the possession continued to be with the petitioner as on the date of repealed act came into force, the matter stands covered by the decision of this Court dated 25th July, 2008 in the case of Voltas Ltd. Vs. Additional Collector in Writ Petition No.8356 of 2006. Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment referred above. [BILAL NAZKI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]