Civil Revision No.4158 of 2009 - 1 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Civil Revision No.4158 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: 17.08.2009 **** Gulshan Lal and another . . . . Petitioners VS. Om Parkash & another . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** Present: Ms. Rachna Arora, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2 ***** SURYA KANT J.(ORAL) This Revision Petition is directed by the owner and driver of the alleged delinquent vehicle, against the order dated 1st June, 2009 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh, whereby their evidence has been closed in a claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act. Notice of Motion was issued and in response thereto, counsel for the parties have been heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that given one opportunity, the petitioners shall lead their entire evidence at their own responsibility. Learned counsel for the respondent-claimant has no serious objection, if one such opportunity is granted to the petitioners. Civil Revision No.4158 of 2009 - 2 - Having regard to all the attending circumstances and the stand taken on behalf of the petitioners, this Revision Petition is allowed to the extent that the impugned order dated 1st June, 2009 passed by the Tribunal is set aside and it is directed that one more opportunity may be granted to the petitioners to lead their evidence at their own responsibility, however, subject to payment of cost of Rs.2500/- to the respondent-claimant. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 17.08.2009 shonkar