IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18030 of 2011 1. Prafull Kumar Singh, Son of Late Govind Singh, Resident of Village Kapasi, P.O. and P.S. Karanday, District Sheikhpura. 2. Bumbum Kumar, Son of Sri Tulsi Sah, Resident of Village and P.O. Belchhi, P.S. Karanday, District Sheikhpura. ----- Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Sheikhpura, District Sheikhpura. 4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Sheikhpura, District Sheikhpura. 5. The Director, Accounts Administration & Self Employment, Sheikhpura. 6. The Block Development Officer, Chewara, District Sheikhpura. 7. The Block Development Officer, Ariyari, District Sheikhpura. 8. The Block Development Officer, Ghat Kusumba, District Sheikhpura. ---- Respondents. ----------- 2 15.10.2011 Heard Mr. S.B.K. Mangalam, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.C. to G.P. 11 for the respondents. The petitioners are aggrieved by the proceedings of the meeting dated 30.1.2010 NAREGA Establishment Committee of Sheikhpura district which was followed by the consequential order also dated 30.1.2010 contained in Memo No. 23 GO issued by the Deputy Development Commissioner, Sheikhpura by which the contracts of the petitioners have been terminated. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that similarly situated persons whose name figured in those orders in the said proceeding and the consequential order had moved before this Court in CWJC No. 6360 of 2 2010 in which by order dated 4.1.2011 the impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remanded to the authorities for considering the show-cause of the petitioners and passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that inspite of the petitioners, though not having moved this Court, also filing representation before the concerned authority no order has been passed in their case whereas in the case of the persons who had approached this Court in the earlier writ application, their joining has been accepted by order contained in Memo No. 1625 dated 8.9.2011. In view of the facts and circumstances of this case, the writ petition is disposed off with a direction to the respondent no. 4 to pass appropriate orders on the representation filed by the petitioners taking into account the order passed by this Court dated 4.1.2011 in CWJC No. 6360 of 2010 within four weeks from the date of production/receipt of a copy of this order upon him. He shall also be obliged to pass consequential orders thereupon within the next two weeks. It is clarified that the respondents would be obliged to follow the same 3 procedure and also pass similar orders as required by order dated 4.1.2011, passed in CWJC No. 6360 of 2010. With the aforementioned observations and directions this writ petition stands disposed off. Sanjay (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)