FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6884 OF 2011 "Gangadhar Govinda Dongare Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. Ajay S. Deshpande, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.V. Kurundkar, GP for respondent No.1 to 3. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 2nd DECEMBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. The petitioner restricts his claim in the petition for the limited purpose of remanding the matter to the respondent committee, for considering his claim afresh. Shri Deshpande, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the procedure prescribed it is the vigilance cell which is required to visit the place of residence of a candidate and his relatives. he, however, submits that in any case, the petitioner could not report to the vigilance cell since there was a death in the family. He, therefore, submits that in the interest of justice it is necessary, particularly, in view of the documentary evidence placed on record, that the matter is reexamined by the committee. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6884 OF 2011 "Gangadhar Govinda Dongare Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 2] We, therefore, allow the petition and direct the respondent No. 2 committee to re-consider the claim of the petitioner, after allowing him to submit the documents that are now in possession of the petitioner. Rule made absolute in aforesaid terms, with on orders as to costs. The order of status quo granted earlier shall stand vacated. [M.T. JOSHI,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-