BailAppl 1267/08 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.1267/08 Yamin Versus State DATE OF ORDER : 19/02/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Peush Nag, for accused-petitioner Mr. R.P. Kuldeep, Public Prosecutor *** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the material on record. It has been contended by counsel that present accused-petitioner and complainant – both are cousins and belong to same family. Parties have entered into a compromise - copy whereof was filed before learned trial court also. This fact has been recorded by learned trial Judge in Para 3 of his order. Taking note of material on record and without expressing any opinion on merits, this court considers it appropriate to allow the anticipatory bail of accused-petitioner Yamin. Accordingly, I allow the bail application of the petitioner U/s 438 Cr.P.C. and the SHO/IO of Police Station Nasirabad City, Ajmer is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Yamin in FIR No.124/07, he shall enlarge him on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- to his satisfaction on the following conditions: (i) He shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when requires; BailAppl 1267/08 [2] (ii) He shall not directly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any Police Officer; (iii) He shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA1267Bail Application2008 19-2.doc