IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 5640 of 2008. Decided on: 09.12.2010. _________________________________________________________ Chaman Parkash Puri. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. M.C. Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Adarsh K. Vashishta, Advocate for respondent No.3. Rajiv Sharma, J.(Oral): It is not in dispute that the present lis is covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Navin Chand Prasher versus The State of H.P. and others, CWP(T) No.2530 of 2008, decided on 6th March, 2009. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for pensionary/retiral benefits in view of the principles laid down by this Court in the judgment cited above, within a period of two months after 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - production of certified copy of this judgment. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 09, 2010. (sck).