IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (T) No. 1^66/2008 PETITIONER : ..*<y ^/• \f ^y ^: ^r' \y^..'f ^ ^ RESPONDENTS ^( ^y^ Jc M/s S. S. Enterprises, A partnership Firm, through Partner Subhash Kumar Aganval, Aged about 46 years, S/o Late Shri Babulal Ji Mittal, R/o Juna Bilaspur, Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus- 1< State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Commercial Tax, Mantralaya, D. K. S. , Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Chhattisgarh State Minor Forest Produce (Trading & Development) Co-operative Federation Ltd. Through its Managing Director, A-25, VIP Estate, near VIP Club, Khamardih, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Commissioner, Commercial Tax,Vanijyik Kar Bhawan, ^ Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.). 4. Union of India, Through Secretaiy, Department of Commercial Tax, New Delhi. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC.OR_ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. ^l^^:?^ ^^10' !/ -yL'^ s .:• I,.;- K:.1 III •-""^ ^^ ^pT ^\^ ^TO 3i1^RT sr»^ict» SB : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihol Go^ TSf nMI<llK'l<4, ©Tll^Ko,f®tdt-yll< M^^J.U^../..^... HWvi{ *^11<*»'""""""'""""""""""/"""C"'""^200 <3TI^?T 'T?W ('i?I^<i^) (SKIIW 'Mfta <MJ^I n 1-10-2010 Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Shr Sharma, Shri B.D. Guru, Shri Par Tiwari, Shri Ajay Mishra, Shri Ha| Patel, Shri Ratan Pusty, Shri Dalpati, Shri P.K. Badhuri & Shri /] for the respective petitioners. Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, Depul State/respondents. Common order has been No.2060 of 2002 (M/sShyam Biri| Chhattisgarh & Others) including th| Signed and dated. On the request of learned] petitioners, the effect and operatji M/s Shyam Bih Works Ltd. (s matters shall not be given effect t^ from today. Certified copy as per judgment & order. Neelabh Dubey, Ms. Smiti fkaj Shrivastava, Shri V.R. 1-sh Wardhan, Shri Sanjay /^mrito Das, Shri Akhilesh ^nup Majumdar, Advocates <?»i<it<n<flti'w^if^ fs^si <r»i^i< ^3fR!H3?1^T |y Advocate General for the pjassed & delivered in W.P. IWorks Ltd. v. The State of |is petition. counsel appearing for the jon of the order passed in su^ra) and other connected for a period of four weeks rules along with main Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge t^ ^^•^^^^-7}^^ ^yr.<^^ fS/l 47—2/2010-1,00,000.