IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2010 / 19TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 17209 of 2010(A) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- RAJEEVAN C.S., S/O. BHARATHAN VAIDYAR, AGED 52 YEARS, 'SREE PADMAM', 1ST FLOOR, VIVEKANANDA COLONY, KUNNATHURMEDU, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE HOME SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THRISSUR RANGE, THRISSUR. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, D.P.O.ROAD, PALAKKAD. 5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAKKAD. 6. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARCOTIC CELL, PALAKKAD. 7. ASHA, W/O. P.V.KRISHNAMOORTHY, PLANKATTIL HOUSE, CHADAYANKALAI, PUDUSSERI AMSOM, PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. R1 TO R6 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.17209 of 2010-A ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 9th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioner has approached this Court seeking protection against the harassment by respondents 5 and 6 (police officers) on the basis of the complaint made by the 7th respondent in respect of the civil dispute connected with the properties covered by Ext.P1 judgment. 2. Ext.P1 is the decree restraining the 7th respondent and her men from trespassing into the properties of the petitioner. It is stated that respondents 5 and 6 are acting under the influence of the 7th respondent and exerting pressure and harassing the petitioner either to pay more money to the 7th respondent or to sell the property to her. 3. Learned Government Pleader, on instruction, submits that a petition was received from the 7th respondent to the Chief Minister and it is forwarded to the 6th respondent and that all the documents were produced including Ext.P1 judgment. It is submitted that respondents 5 and 6 shall not W.P.(C) No.17209 of 2010 -2- interfere with the matter between the petitioner and the 7th respondent. We record the above submission and close the writ petition. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS