IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Civil Contempt No. 68 of 2008 Manoj Kumar S/O Late Prem Lal, R/O House No. 22/3 Prem Nagar, Dehradun, District Dehradun. ….. Petitioner. Versus Major General R.S.Tanwar, Sureyor General, Survey of India, Dehradun. …Contemnor/Respondent. Sri Kishore Kumar holding brief of Sri M.C.Pant, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri K.P. Upadhyay, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. Date May 08, 2008. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Heard Sri Kishore Kumar, Advocate, holding brief of Sri M.C.Pant, learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner and perused the record. This contempt petition has been filed to punish the contemnor for committing gross contempt of the order dated 28-2- 2006 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 827 of 2004 (S/S) Manoj Kumar Vs. Union of India and others. In the writ petition No. 827 of 2004(SS), this Court, while quashing the impugned order dated 18.9.2002, has passed an order to the effect that “ the respondents are directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within two months after obtaining certified copy of this order. However, the respondents are directed to accommodate the petitioner wherever vacancy of 5% arises.” From a perusal of the record, I find that the representation of the petitioner dated 3.11.2000 has been decided by a speaking order (Annexure No.5), whereby it had been decided by the Officer concerned that the case of Shri Manoj Kumar for appointment on compassionate ground will be again submitted before the committee along with other cases as and when the vacancies arise under the 5% quota, and further action will be taken as per decision of the committee. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the appointment was given another person under 5% quota by order dated 22-1-2008 (Annexure No. 6) and the case of the petitioner was ignored. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the respondent, separate cause of action may arise therefrom and he may assail that order before appropriate Court. With the above observations, the contempt petition is dismissed in limine. All pending applications stand disposed of. (B.S. Verma, J.) RCP