IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15278 of 2009 SMT. ASHA PRASAD, W/O LATE GOPAL PRASAD, R/O VILL- RING BANDH, COURT BAZAR ROAD, WARD NO. 5, SITAMARHI AT PRESENT, INCHARGE HEAD MASTER OF KAUSHALYA SANSKRIT HIGH SCHOOL, MAHUA, P.S. MAHUA, DISTT. VAISHALI…………….PETITIONER. VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH COMMISSIONER-CUM- SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE SPECIAL DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION (SANSKRIT) BIHAR, PATNA 3. BIHAR SANSKRIT SIKSHA BOARD THROUGH ITS SECRETARY EAST BORING CANAL ROAD, PATNA 4. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR SANSKRIT SIKSHA BOARD, EAST BORING CANAL ROAD, PATNA 5. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR SANSKRIT SIKSHA BOARD, EAST BORING CANAL ROAD, PATNA 6. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, VAISHALI 7. MR. RAVINESH PRASAD S/O LATE BRIJ NANDAN PRASAD R/O DOHAJI RAMCHANDRA, P.S. GORAUL, DISTT. VAISHALI, THE THEN ASSISTANT TEACHER OF KAUSHALYA SANSKRIT HIGH SCHOOL, MAHUA, P.S. MAHUA, DISTT. VAISHALI 8. MR. TULSI PRASAD SINGH S/O LATE RAGHU NANDAN SINGH R/O VILL- CHHATWARA CHAK SEKHNIZAM, P.S. MAHUA, DISTT.- 9. MR. KRISHNA CHANDRA S/O LATE RAM EKBAL MANDAL, R/O VILL- JANAKI ASTHAN SITAMARHI, WARD NO. 2, P.S. SITAMARHI, DISTT. SITAMARHI 10.MR. JAI NANDAN PRASAD S/O SRI RAJ MANGAL PRASAD, R/O VILL- PATSHARMA PACHHIYARI, P.S. GAIGHATTI, DISTT. MUZAFFARPUR 11.SMT. KUMKUM DEVI W/O LATE TRIBHUBAN KUMAR (THE THEN ASSISTANT TEACHER AND KAUSHALYA SANSKRIT HIGH SCHOOL MAHUA, P.S. MAHUA, DISTT. VAISHALI) R/O VILL- SADAPUR, MAHUA, P.S. MAHUA, DISTT. VAISHALI…………RESPONDENTS. For the petitioner : Mr. Sushil Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. S.P. Tripathi, SC-7 and Mr. A.P. Sinha, Advocate. ----------- 02/ 13.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for the Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board. 2 This writ petition has been filed for directing the respondents to cancel the approval of respondent nos.7 to 11 which they got fraudulently by making forged signature of the then Secretary of the Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board with connivance of the other officials of the said Board and for recovery of the amount of salary which they had received. This question cannot be decided in writ case and the petitioner should have raised such dispute before the authority concerned in accordance with law. In the said circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition for filing an appropriate application before the authority concerned. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. harish/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )