IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION N0. /~^S-5^ OF 2006 PETITIONER ^^, JS ..•'&.•• h-f^y ^^ y o^. ^-* .^L^ o'/~%*' .7 ,< f Dhyan Singh Pendro S/o Veer Singh, aged about 38 years, Occupation- Rural Horticulture Extension Officer, Mohtara Khurd, Block Pandariya, District- Kabirdham C.G. VERSUS ^,?^^.^-^',. '. SENGU RESPONDENTS Gt^*Ltai WRIT ^-COP1E r^ is^t. ^.G.»0 - 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through; The Secretary, Department of Agriculture, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) !. Santosh Kum.ar Baghel, Rural Horticulture Extension, Officer, posted at Jagadalpur, District Jagadalpur C.G. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. MAY THIS. f*tWWSSW <3??<lT<tl<<l<»«>yi^<9<|<i;ftri!|<Hi^< .......^f.1^2':^ I^T!»TR»fj<t! iranSStliNte SIJ^TitRq? (^393) &-4-2QQ6 Shri Rakesh.Pandey, coun^el for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govt. Ativocate for the State. Heard. The petitioner has ni( •bl^t[CT<!l't tiinV^'KcS'jlSRgf? ^aif^iTan^?! 27-12-2005 (Annexure-P/1) when id this petition against the order dated iby he has been transferred from Kabirdham to Jagdalpur. It is submitted thatthetpetitioner has been transferred during ban period and during examination of his cjhiidren. Learned counseF submitted that for the present ends of justice wili be ^en/ed if a direotion is given tothe respondert authorities to decids the represen(ation of the petitioner. The prayer is not opposed i-iaving consjdefed and wi case; in the opinion 'of this Court, |by the other side, |hout expressing any opinion on the merits of the ^nds of justice wiii be served if a direotion is given to the petittoner to make a detail^d representation raising his grievances before the competent authority of respondeijits alongwith a copy of the petition and this order within a period of 15 days from (oday and on suoh representation being Tjied, the competent authority of the respofidents shaii decide the same on its own merits in aceordance with iaw as eariy asjpossibte preferabiy within a period of two months Trom the date of receipt of repres^ntation. Shri Pandey.states that tijie petitioner has not been reiievea' and he may be aiiowed to oontinue. It is made ciear that if thf petitioner has not been relieved, he be allowea to continue tiii the next date of hear(ig. Wjth the aforesaid obser^tions, this petition stands disposed of. Consequentiy, M.W.P. N(j. 1304/20P6-st§ndsdisposedof, Certiried copy as per ruie^ Sd/- pakhruddin Judge >A ^ i605-20,&00