HON’BLE SHRI G.S. SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Appeal No.920 of 2006 Between: Bhupathiraju Satyanarayana Raju @ Satti Raju ……Appellant And Bhupathiraju Satyanarayana Raju and nine others ……Respondents :: JUDGMENT :: Counsel for the Appellant : Shri K.V.L.Narasimha Rao Counsel for Respondent Nos.1, 2, 8 and 10 : None Counsel for Respondent Nos.3 and 4 : Shri V.V.Prabhakar Rao Counsel for Respondent Nos.5 to 7 : Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj Counsel for Respondent No.9 : Government Pleader for Home September 15, 2006 Per G.S. SINGHVI, CJ This appeal is directed against interlocutory order dated 04-08-2006 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPMP No.20149 of 2006 in Writ Petition No.16149 of 2006. Shri K.V.L. Narasimha Rao, learned counsel for the appellant says that the appeal has become infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such, because the learned Single Judge has disposed of the main petition. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel, the appeal is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the writ appeal, WAMP No.1945 of 2006 filed by the appellant for interim relief is also disposed of as infructuous. G.S.SINGHVI, CJ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J 15-09-2006 ks