IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH MAY 2010 / 29TH VAISAKHA 1932 WA.No. 804 of 2009(A) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.9500/2009 Dated 25/03/2009 .................... APPELLANTS(S)/PETITIONERS: -------------- 1. RAMACHANDRA KURUP G., S/O. GOPALAKURUP PRASANTH BHAVAN, THEGAMAM P.O., SOORANAD VIA, ADOOR 690 522. 2. RAJASEKHARA PILLAI, S/O. KRISHNA PILLAI, RAJADHANI, THGAMOM P.O., SOORANAD VIA, ADOOR -22. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.K.JAGADEESH SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, 20, SANCHAR BHAVAN, ASHOKA ROAD, NEW DELHI 110 001. 2. PALLICKAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PAZHAKULAM P.O., ADOOR – 691 527. 3. VASUDEVAN NAIR, SREEKRISHNA BHAVAN, P.P. WARD NO. 11/338-B(XVI/196-A) PAZHAKKULAM P.O., ADOOR 691 527. ADV. SRI.T.SANJAY, CGSC FOR R1 SRI. K.SHAJ FOR R2 SRI.SAJJU.S FOR R2 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.CHELAMESWAR, C.J. & P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ---------------------------------------- W.A.No.804 of 2009 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of May, 2010 JUDGMENT J.Chelameswar,C.J. When this matter was taken up a representation was made by Sri.K.Jagadeesh, one of the counsel appearing for the appellant, that “the concerned counsel is not available”. The Counsel is not aware of the details of the case nor does he carry any paper with him. As a whole, it appears that the counsel is casual in the matter. In the circumstances, we do not think it appropriate to proceed further with the appeal. The appeal is dismissed. J.CHELAMESWAR Chief Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN Judge TKS