THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2148 of 2010 Dated:20.08.2010 Between: Velaga Dharma Raju ….Petitioner And Nalla Mohana Rao. …Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2148 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner is the plaintiff. In the suit filed in 2007, being O.S.No.813 of 2007, for recovery of possession and consequential injunction, he moved I.A.No.761 of 2009 under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), for appointment of Advocate Commissioner to measure the land comprised in R.S.Nos.204 and 195 of Bandapuram Village and trace the plaint schedule property. By impugned order dated 13.11.2009 the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kovvur, dismissed the said application, aggrieved by which, Article 227 of the Constitution of India is invoked in the Civil Revision Petition. Counsel made submissions. After perusing the impugned order and considering the submissions, this Court does not find any error in exercise of discretion by the Court. In any suit for immovable property, as required under Order VII Rule 3 of CPC the plaint shall contain a description of the property sufficient to identify it and if such property can be identified by boundaries or numbers in a record of settlement or survey, the plaint shall specify such boundaries or numbers. The suit relief either granted or rejected with reference to the schedule to the plaint which contains all the details. Having already filed the plaint he cannot now seek appointment of Advocate Commissioner for tracing the land and measuring the same. The impugned order does not suffer from any error apparent on the face of the record. The Civil Revision Petition is, therefore, dismissed. __________________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 20.08.2010 vs