IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8120 of 2009 JANG BAHADUR RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.14669 of 2009 JANG BAHADUR @ JANG BAHADUR RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 08/05/2009 Two petitions have been filed by the present petitioner against the one impugned order and the same has been concealed by him in both the petitions. There is concealment in making statement regarding filing of another petition by the same accused. The petitioner has played fraud with the court, so he does not deserve any sympathy from the court. The petitioner is sole named accused of a case registered under sections 363 and 366A of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the above facts, I am not inclined to entertain both the applications filed by the petitioner. Accordingly, both the applications are dismissed. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)