1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.166 OF 2005 Harish Chandra Gutt & Co.Pvt.Ltd. ... Petitioner. vs. Pratima Shekhar Dandekar. ... Respondent. --- Mr.P.G.Pravin, for Petitioner. Mr.Shailesh Shah i/b. N.Jagtap & co., for Respondent. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. DATED: 3rd May,2005 P.C.:- 1. All the findings that have been recorded by the Appellate Tribunal turn on appreciation of evidence on record. It is not the complaint that any material produced on record has not been considered by the Appellate 2 Tribunal. The evidence which is appreciated by the Arbitrators cannot be re- appreciated by this Court in its jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996. Therefore, I do not find any reason for this Court to interfere with the Award. Petition disposed of. ---