( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1780 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 1750 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra APPLICANT VERSUS Manohar Nivrati Suryawanshi and another. RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1790 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 1762 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra APPLICANT VERSUS Bhanudas Niwarti Suryawanshi and another. RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1782 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 1759 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra APPLICANT VERSUS Mangal w/o Bhanudas Suryawanshi and another. RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1784 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 1768 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra APPLICANT ( 2 ) VERSUS Balaji Bhanudas Suryawanshi and another. RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1786 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 1772 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra APPLICANT VERSUS Pralhad Niwarti Suryawanshi and another. RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1788 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 1775 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra APPLICANT VERSUS Raghoba Niwarti Suryawanshi and another. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. S.K. Tambe, A.G.P. for the applicant/State in all the civil applications. Mr. Gaddime, advocate holding for Mr. V.D. Gunale, advocate for the respondent No. 1 in all the civil applications. ..... [CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] [DATE : 1st April, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard learned A.G.P. for the applicant and ( 3 ) learned counsel for the respondent No.1. 2. These are the applications for condonation of delay of 1215 days in filing first appeals against the judgement and award passed by the Reference Court. The said civil applications have been opposed by the respondents by filing affidavit-in-reply. Though the proposal was received by the office of the Government Pleader in January, 2006, the certified copy for the first time was applied in the month of October, 2008. There is no explanation of whatsoever nature for not applying for the certified copy immediately and filing the first appeals. In view of the fact that there is no sufficient caused mentioned in the applications, all the civil applications are rejected, with no order as to costs. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE NPJ/ca1780-09-group ( 4 )