< ^.^•fe:jS. .l'1--"""""\y^<J-"""""..." ^^^3^\^."-"-'"" c ^1\^(, §& O lf% d EB E;-S S £L" .gca. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 5'3>-9 /2006 3 PETITIQNER / Jyoti Kumar Agrawal son of late Shri Omprakash Agrawal, aged about 36 years, resident Of Nehru Nagar-Balco [Ward No, 31] District Korba [C.G.]. VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1] State of Chhattisgarh- Through The Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.]. Chief Medical Officer, Korba, District Korba [C.G.]. Collector, Korba, District Korba [C.G.]. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. DIRECTIQN ..,..., ETC. XI-HC-22 TST ^w^pv, 's^v'i's. f^nny WWITeiHIen __U.f?.^...S33/Gf an^TsiiT R-ii.'h sn^i *^i'*'(I^T i'\SOi an^i^Rnw(rt?B t- Petitionerby ShriV.K. Paudf Shri.S.P. Kate, Goyt. Adv. &] With consent, heard finally. This case relates to coinpas; death ofaa eiaployee serviag iii,th( Leamed coiuisel for fhe pe1 of the einployee has occurred on earUer. It is further submitted No.1322/2002 mvolving the sscme. Coiut on 20/12/2005. He prays case also. Leamed counsel for the S1 states that the State of Chhattisg cases of dependaiits ofthose euij strictly in accordanee with tfae -^ subDiits that four inontiis tune for Inviewofthe subiiussions parties, withput expressiag any opioion -of this Court, ends ofjus^ the State of Chliattisgarh and (t| decide the case of die petitioner fhe. tmie of deafh pf.fhe einployee apponitiueat orders wiB be issue< inontlis froiu flie date of produd petiti.Qner is also directed to rende[ inade clear that if aay grievarice reinedy available uiider the law ^ Court. ; With the aforesaid observatit Certified copy .as perrules. Copy to the State counsel,| order to fhe respondents for coinp| chl^F<1Aj1l T:FFT^r ^ 1^^' <^T^.l< i73ri;OT3fl^T jy, Advocate. the State. ^ionate appoiatDient consequent upon th State. : , • jjtioner categoncaUy stated fhat, ffae deatJ 115-10-2002 i.e. after 1-11-1997 and no that ia batch of cases beaiiag W.P Ique.stion orders have beea passed by ffai; |that sim.flar Qrders may be passed ia fhii ^ite does not dispute the above fact aiic ;^rh has taJken a decisiou to consider thf j^loyees who died on or after 1/11/199'/ jolicy prevalent at fh.at time. He howeva jissuing necessary orders aiay be given. ^nade bv learaed counsel appearmg for th( ^pinion on fhe inerits of the case, iQ fh.( sfice wiU be served ifa direction is given fc aufhorities conceined to consider aad jjd acconlance wifh the policy prevalent ai ;oncem.ed. Ifthe.petttione.rfouad eUgible, as early as possible preferablywitlun^ ion/receipt of a copy of this order, The r due 00-0peratiou to ftieauftiorities. It is IstiU reidams, fhe petitioner may avail the tdyding fiUng of the petition before tfais ins, this petition stands 'disposed of. who wiU be obUged to coiniaUiucate the laiice. . . ..., .»-„.„„ Sd/- 1 Fakhruddin Judge ['ifl^^rei^