IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWPs No. 6887 and 6888 of 2010. Decided on: 16th November, 2010. 1. CWP No. 6887 of 2010. Kamal Prakash. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 2. CWP No. 6888 of 2010. Partap Singh. Vs. State of H.P. & others. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Inder Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim work charge status, arrears, seniority and other service benefits from the date they completed 10 years of continued service. Reliance is placed on the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P. and others, 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 313. 2. The learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The petitioners may file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the second respondent within a period of one month from today. The second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders 2 thereon in accordance with law, in the light also of the decision referred to above within a period of another four months. The petitioners will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment referred to in this judgment while submitting the representation(s). 3. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 16th November, 2010 (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr) Judge. 3