^—-- TTO^T wai<rti<A IT£2TO^?Tff^TRTR^ SffteTUT yu^LOd 71^7 E?.^T. / ' •( \ '/', / , / ( ', aft.r.^Ttqp............/2002 ^ 3ti^Rcbl : ^.^ST ^RTt @1H iqciig ^y^ro-cT WWcT qioictl *lQld<yi^ l;^T-l?oT.^QId<yi^ ^-l6lxy<P fiTf$re?T, 3TT^[ 45 ^ tfcTT Sre57 cpldloll, TTT5TT ^ICT, ^W^. R^idS STaii^Qcp^iUT: 1. ^Tn^aic^ SHTra" ^RT ^Rc< T^T flTSTT f^TSrTaT ti5iid<u ^.^.i33T.3ra3T, ?ray ??.ST. 2. ^xlldcf? ^^ f^T^TUT ^-iuidaiici^ <l<4y T5.7\. 3. fSiZTT flTCT 3Tf&^rft 7rayi?.3T. an^SH q^r afpr^Fcr am 19, IT-CT- a'9n7rf3r^ ^Rr^rur 1985 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. fe) No.4586 of2005 Petitioner Versus Ku» Wahida Bano Khaii (after niarriage ka.own as Smt Vaxdta MudUyar) Respondents : State of Chhatdsgarh fi& others Sfcn^le Bencli: Hon*ble Mr. Justice Satfcrii K. Agnihotrt. Shri Aml Siagh Rajput, Advocate for fhe Petitloner, Smt. Anju Ahuja, Qovt. Advocate for fhe State/respondents. ORDER (318t0ctober, 2006) 1, The petitioner is working as Assistant Teacher m the goveroinent schools. In the course of fheir services as Assistaiit Teacher, fhe petitioner has obtained B. T.I, exaxnioiation certificate on her own expenses before 1.3.1999. 2, Accordiag to learaed couusel for fhie petitioner, the petitioner is eiitided to two advance increnients ia view of fhe decision of this Court ia fh.e case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwai Vs. Muiuc^^ Corporation. Dure and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96). This Court in fhe case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mumcipal Corporatk>xi, Dui^ and anotiier (Supra), came to fhe conclusion fhat fhe teachers, who had obtaiaed B. Ed./B,T.I, Examiaation Certificate on their own expenses, arc covered by fhe circular dated 24,12<98 issued by the State Goveniment of Madhya Pradesh. 3. Fiuther m the matter of Smt Manoiama Slmwastaya.Ys.^late^rf M.P. and othera { 2000 (1) M.P.L.S.R. 136 } the Madhya Pradesh State Admixustanative Tribunal, GwaUor Bench, whUe considenx^ fhe circular dated 1.3.1999 whereia, it is provided that fhe Assistant Teachers, who have acquired B. Ed. degree at fheir own cost between 23.10.1964 and 7.5.1973 shaU be entitled to two advance uicremiente, rcUed on decision in fhe case of Rakesh Kumar Sbrivastava Vs, State of M.P. & ofhers passed ia O.A. No. 1632/99, decided on 12.10.1999 wherem it is observed that the ^^3^^ circular dated 1.3.1999 cannot be made appUcabte rctrospectively, Thus, a teacher, may be Assistant Teacher, who has obtamed B. Ed. degree before 1.3.1999 is entitied to two advance iacrements. 4. It is poiuted out by leanied counsel appearing for the petitioners that the fhen State of Madhya Pradesh had filed a Special Leave Ftetition against fhe orders passed by the Tribiuial aad the Hon^ble Supreme Court dismissed Special Leave Petition No, 1999/2000 fi&d agaiast the order of fhe TribunaL Therefore^ fhe direction to fhe effect fhat fhe circular dated 1.3.1999 caanot be niade appUcable retrospectivety, passed by fhe Tribunal, becojiies final aad fhe sanie shall be appUcable to aU fhe Assistaat Teachers who have obtaiaed B. Ed, examination certificate before 1.3.1999. It is furfher substaatiated by a circular dated 17.10.2003 rasued by fhe present State of Madhya Pradesh whereia fhe circular clearly states about the decision ofthe Suprexae Court, Learaed couiisel for the petitioners furfher submits fhat fhe facts and questiou of law iavolved ia fhe present case are squarely covered by decision of fhis Court ia the case of Yashwaat Kuxaar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Dui^ and aaofher (Supra), to which leamed coiiasel appearing for the respondents fah'ly concedes aad agrees wifh fhe averoient niade by learaed counsel appearing for fhe petitioners. Accordmgly, fhe writ petition is allowed in terms of fhe oider passed m fhe case of Yashwaat Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Coiporation^ Durg aaid anofher (Supr^, subject to venfication of fhe fact as to whether fhe petitioners have acquired B.T.I. Examination Certificate on fheir own expenses as per fhe circiilars dated 24.12.1998 and 1.3.1999 aad further whefher they have beeu paid tavo advance uicrenients or not. No oider as to costs. Subhash Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge