THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.6142 of 2007 Date:05.04.2007 Between: G.Krishna Rao .. PETITIONER AND The Chairman & Managing Director and others. ..RESPONDENTS ORDER: The petitioner claims to be the allottee of Shed No.19 in Technocrat’s Industrial Estate, Balanagar. He is said to have initially obtained power connection for 35HP for his own use. One of his tenants M/s.Ceakay Rubber Works had also obtained a separate power connection for 70HP vide service connection No.28331. According to the petitioner, the said tenant vacated the premises and with the consent of both the parties, service connection No.28331 was transferred in his name. He claims to have made an application to the respondents for shifting of service connection No.28331 to a different place to avoid pilferage and other threats to it. His grievance is that no action has been taken thereon. The learned standing counsel for the respondents had obtained instructions at the stage of admission. He has placed before this Court, a copy of order of temporary injunction in I.A.No.1895 of 2005 in O.S.No.1955 of 2005 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar. It is stated that one of the tenants of the petitioner by name M/s.Toolmak had obtained an order of temporary injunction against the petitioner and in that view of the matter, the request of the petitioner cannot be acceded to. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondents. The petitioner has placed before this Court a copy of the bill issued for the month of January, 2007 in respect of service connection No.28331 in the name of the petitioner. It prima facie indicates that the petitioner is now the subscriber for that service connection. It is categorically asserted that the order of temporary injunction obtained in O.S.No.1955 of 2005 relates to 35HP connection, which stands in the name of the petitioner. If no order of temporary injunction is operating against the respondents, there cannot be any difficulty in acceding to his request for shifting the meter. For the foregoing reasons, the writ petition is disposed of, directing that in case the order of temporary injunction passed in I.A.No.1895 of 2005 in O.S.No.1955 of 2005 is not in relation to service connection No.28331, the respondents shall take necessary steps for shifting of the same as required by the petitioner, within two weeks from today. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________ 05.04.2007 kdl