IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 19697 of 2007 Between: 1 Kottam Tulasi Reddy Memorial Educational Society, rep.by its Treasurer Mr.K.Tulasi Nath, S/o.K.Karunakar Reddy R/o.251, HIG, BHEL, RC Puram, Hyderabad 2 Sri Kottam Tulasi Memorial College of Engineering Kondair village, Itikyala , Mahabubnagar district rep.by its Secretary & Correspondent K.tulasi Nath 3 Mr.K.tulasi nath s/o.K.Karunakar Reddy r/o.251, HIG BHEL, RC Puram Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Convenor ,ICET-AC 2007(SW-III) Admission , 401, Srinivasa Apartments, A66, 6th street, Humayunagar, Hyderabad 2 AP State council for Higher Education, rep.by its Secretary Masabtank, Hyderabad 3 The Government of AP., Higher Technical Education Department ,.rep.by its Principal Secretary, secretariat, Buildings, Hyderabad 4 All India Council for Technical Education, rep.by its Member secretary ,New Delhi 5 Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad rep.by its Registrar .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not admitting the 2nd petitioner MCA course to counseling and allotting students under the convenor quota as being illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction unconstitutional and consequently direct the 1st respondent to either admit the candidates through counselling or permit the petitioners to fill up the seats through spot admissions and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 19697 OF 2007 ORDER: 1. This writ petition has been filed assailing the action of the respondents in not allotting the students under the convener quota to the petitioner’s institution for the academic year 2007-08. 2. Learned standing counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent submits that the relief has become infructuous since the academic year 2007-08 has been over. This factual aspect is not contradicted by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 13th August, 2008. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 19697 OF 2007 13th August, 2008.