(1) /)¥ PETITIONER Bhavika Vaidya, D/o Shri Kishor‘e Vaidya, aged abou’r 28 year‘s, R/o Ward No. 16, Tulsipur', Mam’ra Nagar‘, Near Railway Line, Disfricf- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS S’ra’re of Chha’r’risgar‘h Through : The Secretary Schedule Cas’re & Schedule Tribe, Tr‘ibal Welfare Deparfmenl, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (6.6.) Union of India Through The SecreTary Personnel and PrivaTe Grievances Cell, Loknayak Bhawan, Khan Marke‘r, New Delhi Sub—Divisional Officer, Rajnandgaon, Dislric’r Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Tahsildar, Rajnandgaon, Dis’rricf- Raj nandgaon (C.G.) pgglmk IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIsARi—i AT BILAsPUR w. P. (a) No. ,2, yzg of 2009 ,l‘l; w ‘¢ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE ¢ ‘é CONsTITUTION OF INDIA. e $‘1 H EGH {KNERT QF SHHAWI$GARH AT BILA$P§JR WRET PETWwN {£3} NC}. 3723'} {BF zmw Rg§n0irmem$ WRE PETI";i1’DN UNEER ARWCLE 228/22? i3? THE €QN$T§TUH£3N OF §ND§A Petétmnef Bhavika ‘Jalaya Vensus $%a‘?.e (If Qhhaiiisgarh & Q‘khem §5§$ z Wanahm Min $ai§s§3 K. §gnmomg Na‘flé Sim An&¥.Shfidhar, Pam! Lawye¥ far {he $iate. $hri RA Pa‘adhan Stamiéng counses for the: fespmxdent Na2 s’ {imam 0f 3mm. GQBER IGRAU {Fassed ara 25‘“ day af Septemher, 2mm ;a The matter is caiieci for haaring. None appeam nor is any feprssentatien made on behaif 9f the petitietner. The yetimner may net be inieresmd in pursuing the matter“ in View of the above, the matier i$ di$missed far wam 0f wasecuiion. §3msent :- Nana far tha petitioner.