- 1 - 15-wp-wp-8778-2011 srj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8778 OF 2011 Danamma @ Rajashree A. Kolhar & Others .. Petitioners. V/s. Divisional Joint Registrar, Co­operative Societies, Kolhapur & Another .. Respondents. Mr. S. S. Patwardhan, for the Petitioners. Mr. S. D. Rayrikar, AGP for Respondent No.1. CORAM: G.S.GODBOLE,J. DATE : 13th DECEMBER, 2011. P.C:­ 1 RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard by consent of the parties. 2 Heard Mr. Patwardhan for the Petitioner and AGP for Respondent. 3 Dispute No.336 of 2003 was filed in the Co­operative Court in which the Miraj Urban Co­operative Bank Pvt. Ltd., (now in liquidation) was a Defendant. An application was made for leave to file an application - 2 - 15-wp-wp-8778-2011 for setting aside the order of abatement of the suit as against the bank in liquidation which has been rejected by impugned order dated 27th July, 2011. 4 Considering the nature of controversy, I do not think that this is a fit case for relegating the Petitioner to the remedy of filing Revision Application under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co­operative Societies Act, 1960. The impugned order is clearly erroneous. No reasons are given for declining the permission under Section 107 of the said Act. The suit was instituted prior to the liquidation. Hence, a case for interference is made out. Rule is, therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). (G.S.GODBOLE,J.)