IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19649 of 2010 1. Jeevan Sharma 2. Divakar Sharma sons of Late Shyamsundar Sharma Both residents of Shaeed Road, Krishna Bhandar Gandhi Chowk, Gaya, P.S.-Kotwali, District-Gaya. ……Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Labour Enforcement Officer-cum- Labour Inspector (Child Labour Prohibition, Gaya Sadar, Gaya. 3. Assistant Labour Commissioner, Agriculture Labour Magadh Division, Gaya. 4. District Certificate Officer, Gaya. …. Respondents. -------- For the petitioners : Mr. Nand Kishore Pd. Sinha, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, A.C. to G.P.IV. --------- 04/ 14.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging orders passed under the Bihar and Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act, 1914 dated 24.05.2010 and 30.06.2010 (Annexure-6 series) and for other ancillary reliefs. 3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to file an appeal under Section 60 of the Act before the statutory authority provided in law. 4. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 5. If the petitioners file an appeal under the aforesaid provision before the statutory appellate authority raising all the - 2 - points raised by them in this writ petition within fifteen days from today along with a copy of this order, the appellate authority shall decide the case on its own merit in accordance with law within a period of two months without being influenced by this order. 6. In the meantime, if the petitioners apprehend any coercive action, they may approach the said appellate authority for any interim relief which the appellate authority shall decide in accordance with law. Sunil (S. N. Hussain, J.)