1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3656 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.3656 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.3656 OF 2008 Shohrab Malik .. Petitioner. vs. The Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4368 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.4368 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.4368 OF 2008 Salim Ali Malik .. Petitioner. vs. The Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.A.A.Mirza for the petitioner Mr.S.R.Rajguru with Mrs.S.V.Bharucha for the respondents CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ. S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ. S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE: 1ST DECEMBER, 2008. DATE: 1ST DECEMBER, 2008. DATE: 1ST DECEMBER, 2008. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. These two writ petitions can be disposed of by a common order as it pertains to increase in the 2 license fee of quarter allotted to the petitioners as the petitioners were licensees on the property of the Deputy Salt Commissioner. The Estate Officer found that the increase in the license fee was justified. The matter was carried in appeal which was dismissed by the Principal Judge, Bombay City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai. 3. We do not find any error or illegality in the finding arrived at by the Estate Officer as well as the Appellate Authority so as to call for any interference. 4. We are informed by the learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners have already been evicted from the premises. 5. Both the petitions stand dismissed with no orders as to costs. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) 3 (S.J. Kathawalla, J.) (S.J. Kathawalla, J.) (S.J. Kathawalla, J.)