1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2337/2009 (Mohan Lal Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) Date of order : 25.03.2009 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondents to complete the enquiry already initiated against the Sarpanch and Gram Sewak, Gram Panchayat Siwana vide Annexure-5 and 6 within stipulated time. This writ petition has been filed by the complainant upon whose complaint, an enquiry was initiated by the Welfare State. In my opinion, the complainant work is over as and when he files a complaint against the person concerned. The Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in case of Surendra Kumar Garg & Ors. Vs. Stae of Raj. Reported in 2005 (1) WLC 243 has held that role of the complainant comes to an end as and when he made the compliant. Here, in this case, the petitioner is seeking direction for 2 completion of the enquiry which is said to be initiated upon the complaint made by the petitioner. In my opinion, no fundamental right of the petitioner is infringed for which any interference is warranted. The intention of the petitioner is to harass the public representative, who is Sarpanch. The welfare State is having all the jurisdiction to initiate the proceedings against Sarpanch, if he has committed any misconduct. The petitioner's duty as a citizen was to point out the irregularity or illegality, if any, committed by the Sarpanch, whether any action is required to be taken or not, it is within the jurisdiction of the State. The complainant cannot be allowed to use legal process to harass the public representative, so also no case is made out for violation of any fundamental right granted by the Constitution of India. Hence, no interference warranted in this case. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with cost. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. arun