HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.NO. 11504 OF 2006 DATED: 12.6.2006 Between: Kum. R. Manjusha … Petitioner and Smt. R. Uma and others … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.NO.11504 OF 2006 ORAL ORDER: No facts whatsoever are pleaded alleging concrete instances of abuse of power by the 3rd respondent, who is the only representative of the State in the Writ Petition. The petitioner has made vague and unspecified allegations of harassment by respondents 1 and 2 who are claimed to be her parents. If the respondents 1 and 2 are interfering with the petitioner’s life, if the petitioner is a major and if the conduct of the respondents 1 and 2 constitutes any cognizable offence, the petitioner has a right to make a complaint to the appropriate police station. When made the complaint is bound to be registered and appropriate investigation taken up. If the petitioner’s grievance is regards any other civil injury inflicted by the respondents 1 and 2, the petitioner’s remedy lies in approaching the appropriate court of civil jurisdiction for appropriate reliefs including injunctive relief restraining the respondents 1 and 2 from interfering with her life or causing obstruction. The writ petition in any event is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. There shall however be no order as to costs. ------------------------------ GODA RAGHURAM, J Date: 12.6.2006 cvm