BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifteenth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12240 of 2011 P.SATHIVEL ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED 1 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADUPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. IN CR.NO. 154/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. C.ASAITHAMBI Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/accused No.1 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324, 307 of IPC r/w Section 4 of Women Harassment Act in Crime No.154 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that because of civil dispute, the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 04.09.2011 and the injured has been discharged from the hospital and the civil case is pending on the file of the District Munsif Court, Vadipatti and except the petitioner, other accused were enlarged on anticipatory bail and investigation is considerably over and he apprehend for arrest and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the case has been registered against 11 persons under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324, 307 of IPC r/w Section 4 of Women Harassment Act and the injured has been discharged from the hospital and he fairly conceded that A2 to A11 were already enlarged on anticipatory bail and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides, the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 4.9.2011 because of the civil dispute and the injured has been discharged from the hospital and A2 to A11 were enlarged on anticipatory bail and even though the petitioner was not https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ arrested, neither he interfered with the investigation nor he absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti, and executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 15/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VADIPATTI, MADURAI DISTRICT. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADUPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. C.ASAITHAMBI Advocate SR.No.32053 SR : 19.09.2011 : 2p/6c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12240 of 2011 Date :15/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/