IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID TUESDAY, THE 26TH JULY 2011 / 4TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 33524 of 2010(M) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- V.K.DHARMARAJAN, SON OF CHOYIKUTTY, AGED 51 YEARS, RESIDING AT VAPPUNGARA HOUSE, KUTTIKATOOR P.O., KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.V.JOHN MANI RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. CHATHAMANGALAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, N.I.T. CAMPUS PO, KOZHIKODE-673 601. 2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, PWD ROADS SECTION, KUNNAMANGALAM P.O., KARANTHUR-673 571. 3. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE SECRETARY, MUSLIM YOUTH LEAGUE, WEST CHATHAMANGALAM UNIT, KALLUSHAPU JUNCTION, CALICUT. R1 BY ADV. SRI.E.NARAYANAN R-3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K. RAMESH R4 BY ADV. SRI.M.MUHAMMED SHAFI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 33524/2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: APPLICATION FILED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 22/01/10 P2: COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 15/02/2010 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT P3: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 2/01/2010. P4: COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 20/02/2010 ISSUED BY 1SR RESPONDENT. P5: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 08/03/2010 FILED BEFORE 1ST RESPONDENT. P6: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 09/03/2010 FILED BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs HARUN-UL-RASHID,J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO.33524 OF 2010 ------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in taking appropriate action against the bus waiting shed illegally constructed by the 4th respondent in front of his property. According to the petitioner, the location of the bus waiting shed is obstructing the smooth ingress and egress to his building. Therefore, the petitioner filed this writ petition for a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 and 2 to consider and pass orders on Exts.P5 and P6 respectively within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. When the matter was taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Exts.P5 and P6 are pending consideration before respondents 1 and 2 respectively. The learned counsel requests that a direction may be issued to respondents 1 and 2 to consider and dispose of Exts.P5 -2- W.P.(C).No.33524/2010 and P6 representations, expeditiously. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the counsel for respondents 1 and 4 and the Government Pleader. 4. In the circumstances, direction is issued to respondents 1 and 2 to consider Exts.P5 and P6 and pass orders thereon in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity for hearing to the petitioner, the 4th respondent and other affected parties, if any, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. kcv.