[1] DBCWP(PAROLE) NO. 9508/2010 UDAY BHAN SINGH Vs. STATE & ORS. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION(PAROLE) NO. 9508/2010 UDAY BHAN SINGH @ BHURA Vs. STATE & ORS. Date: 17.08.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENA V. GOMBER Mr. S.P. Poshwal, for the petitioner. Mr. J.R. Bijarnia, Addl. Govt. Counsel for the respondents. **** Heard learned counsel for the parties Convict-petitioner has preferred this parole writ petition for grant of first parole of 20 days. The respondents in the reply have stated that parole application of petitioner was dismissed on the basis of adverse report of Superintendent of Police as well as Social Welfare Department. Copies of both the reports have also been annexed with the reply and after considering the contents of the same, we are satisfied that the impugned order passed by the District Parole Advisory Committee rejecting the application of the petitioner is absolutely based on cogent reasons and we do not find any illegality in the same. Apart from above, it is also relevant to mention that charge against the petitioner [2] DBCWP(PAROLE) NO. 9508/2010 UDAY BHAN SINGH Vs. STATE & ORS. is that he committed double murder, therefore, looking to the gravity of offence also, we are not inclined to allow the petitioner to be released on parole. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. (MEENA V. GOMBER),J. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. /KKC/