IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 10959 of 2006 Between: 1 The Kalankari Labour Contract Co-op Society Ltd. rep. by President, D. Subba Rao Kakani, Narasaraopet Mandal, Guntur Dist. R/o Kakani 2 The Harijana Labour Contract Co-op. Society Ltd. rep. by President, Y.P. Ranga Rao Ummadivaram Mandal, Guntur Dist. 3 The Kapotheswara Harijana Co-op. Labour Contract Society Ltd., rep. by President, B.V. Koti Reddy Chejerla, Nakarikallu Mandal, Guntur Dist. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND The Executive Engineer R & B Division Narasaraopet, Guntur Dist. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one inthe nature of writ of mandamus to declare action of the respondents in insisting to pay cost o tender schedules and to issue eligibility certiﬁcates and to allow to submit tender schedules and to participate in open auction and to open the petitioners schedules towards Chit Tender Notice No.5/2006-07/T.O., dated 17-05-2006 for contracts works in Roads & Buildings Department, Narasaraopet Division as illegal, arbirary and violative of Art. 14,21,42 & 43 of Constitution of India and contrat to Government instructions (Gos) and consequently direct the respondents to issue Tender Schedules at free of cost and to allow them to submit tender schedules and to allow to participate in theopen auction and to pass suchother order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.10959 of 2006 ORAL ORDER: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on 30.07.2008, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, when the matter is called, none appeared for the petitioners nor is there any representation made on their behalf. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J. Date: 06.08. 2008. VGSR