IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Rev. No. 1470 of 2009 Date of Decision: 12.01.2011 Gopi Ram .... Petitioner Versus Om Parkash ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Gourav Jain, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Jitender Dhanda, Advocate for the respondent 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that learned revisional Court has observed that application moved under Section 319 Cr.P.C. is premature and same can be moved at the appropriate stage after evidence showing involvement of the additional accused is placed on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that in view of the observation made by learned revisional Court an appropriate application shall be moved under Section 319 Cr.P.C. and he may be permitted to withdraw this petition. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to move an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. which shall be decided in accordance with law at its own merits. (ALOK SINGH) 12.01.2011 JUDGE reena