li IN THE MADHYA PRADESH AC.MINISTRATIVE TRIj.'yNAL, RAIPUR BENCH WPW y-c)9/^' O.A. N0. BEfWEEN : SHRI MAHESH KUMAR SONCHHATR& // VERSUS // (1) Government of Madhya Pradesh Through Secretary Higher Education Vallabh Bhavan Bh'opal Madhya Pradesh. (2) Commissioner Higher Edacation Government of Madhya Pradesh Satpura Bhavan Bhopal (M.P.) (3) Principal Govt. N.C.J. Arts Commerce & Science College Dalli Rajhara Distt.-Durg (M.P.) OF £000 APPLICART Ato..:%033^ Wed loday.lK:!6.^3-,— b, sh,i-^.rS^S£.^^k 'For fTsgistrw, M. P. State A*n. Trituniil, RAIPUR. ...RESPONDENTfl DETAILS O.F APPLICATION : 1. Particulars o£ the applicant i. Name of. the applicant ii. Name of father iii. Age 'of the applicant iv. Designation and Particulars of office V. Office Address vi. Address for Service of notice MAHESH KUMAR SONCHHATRA • PRABHODAS SONCHHATRA 51 years Asst.Prof.Commerce Govt. N.C.J. Arts Commerce & Scieoce Col'iege Dalli Rajh.ir-i Dist-Durg (M.P. i C/o 7-r-i.ncipal Govt. N-.C.J Arts Cc'rmerce & Science College Dalli Rajhara Dist - DURG (M.P.) Quarter No. 22-E 3A type Panderdalli Sector Dglli Rajhara Distt.-DURG (.M.P'. Contd.on 2. . . . ( 2 ) Particulars of the respondents : - (1) Government of Madhya Eradesh through Seeretary Higher Education Vallabh Bhavan BKOPAL (M.P.) (2) Commissioner Higher .Edoc.ation Government ..of Madhya Pradesh Satpura Bhavan Bhopal (M.P.) (3) Principal Govt. N.C.J. Arts Commere'e S~ Science College : Dalli Rajhara Dist-Durg (M.P.) Par^biculars of the order against which application is rnade The application is against the following order : Jj;^^i t:^. ] 1 • sss .78 'S^ "MWK-I^, fffll'M'IS, fsfWI+iy ^A:[T:).^.:^^.\.C"^. W^f •T:W (I^Id°<<^) sm^iw Wif '<s?n •affT^r'aRW Tumane wiim^fefaii^i ^)i-^i<vt41'f ^w^l' ^ T^t^t <i^t^K ^3JfiTO3iI^[ SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrtvastava, J, fc>^.l^2010 When the matter was called fol petitioner/s and the matter was passed ol r hearing, none appeared for tne ^er. Even in the second round,none appears forthe petitioner/s. Shri ^fcAe/'l&Ai.'i'^lorthe 4:ate. Earlier S.P.C. was issued tothe pejtitioner/s. Since no one appears for the p^ 'titioner/s and no representation is ^iade on his/their behalf, the petition is di^missed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge