: 1 : Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.463 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.463 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.463 OF 2008 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1266 OF 2003 FIRST APPEAL NO.1266 OF 2003 FIRST APPEAL NO.1266 OF 2003 Shyamsunder Shivchandrai Ruia ...Applicant V/s. Bajranglal Shivchandrai Ruia & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Navin Parekh, Advocate, i/b. Hetal Patel, for the Applicant. . Mr.Gautam Ankhad, Advocate, i/b. Hemant Sethi, for Respondent No.1. . Mr.Kedar Shukla, Advocate, i/b. Udwadia & Udeshi, for Respondent No.6. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATE : 30TH JANUARY, 2008. DATE : 30TH JANUARY, 2008. DATE : 30TH JANUARY, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that private notice has been duly served to the respondent Nos.2a and 2b who are the proposed legal representatives of respondent No.2. The Counsel for the 1st respondent opposed the Application on the ground that a false statement has been made in the Application. 2. None appears for the proposed legal representatives. The delay is only of 59 days. The said delay deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c). Amendment to be carried out within six weeks. : 2 : [ABHAY S. OKA, J.] [ABHAY S. OKA, J.] [ABHAY S. OKA, J.]