IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14461 of 2010 SURYADEO PANDEY @ SURJDEO PANDEY S/O Narayan Pandey, R/O Vill. Chakhay, P.S. warsaliganj, Distrcit Nawada ……Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ….Opp. Party. ----------- 3. 25.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 23.2.2010 in connection with a case registered under Section 387 of the I.P.C. It is alleged in the First Information Report that on 8.2.2010 and 13.2.2010 the ransom was demanded by Phone by one Kundan Yadav. Though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. but subsequently during investigation it has come that the petitioner’s mobile was used for making the demand. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that mobile is not registered in the name of the petitioner but even assuming the allegations made in the F.I.R., no case under Section 387 I.P.C is made out and at best the case under Section 385 I.P.C. is made out that too against Kundan Yadav. Moreover 2 offences under Section 385 I.P.C. are bailable. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Nawada in connection with Pakribrawan P.S. Case No. 17 of 2010. Praveen (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)