IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.32608 -M of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : FEBRUARY 11, 2010 JASPREET SINGH & ORS. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. KS Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. Kuldeep Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent No.2. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) This petition under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, has been filed for quashing of case FIR No.148 dated 1.3.2009 under Sections 448, 379, 506, 148, 149, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Kotwali Bathinda, District Bathinda, and subsequent proceedings, on the basis of compromise. Compromise deed has been placed on record as Annexure P-2. It has been contended that the parties are residents of the same area. They have common society and, therefore, all the disputes have been settled by way of compromise. Respondent No.2/complainant, as identified by his counsel Criminal Misc. No.32608 -M of 2009 2 Shri Kuldeep Chaudhary, Advocate, is present in court and states that he is not ready to prosecute the petitioners. All the disputes have been settled by way of compromise. Compromise deed (Annexure P-2) has been endorsed. Considering the above given facts and also the nature of offences, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the FIR. The petition is allowed. FIR No.148 dated 1.3.2009 under Sections 448, 379, 506, 148, 149, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Kotwali Bathinda, District Bathinda, and subsequent proceedings, are quashed. February 11, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?