IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9438 of 2009 1. AMRENDRA KUMAR, SON OF UJJAWAL PRAKASH TIWARI, R/O VILLAGE BABHANTOLI, P.S. SHIVHAR, DISTT-SHIVHAR. 2. RAKESH KUMAR, SON OF RAMESHWAR SINGH, R/0 VILLAGE HARNAHI, P.S. SHIVHAR, DISTRICT SHIVHAR. 3. PRIVIN SAH, SON OF BHIKHARI SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PIPRAHI, P.S. PIPRAHI, DISTRICT SHIVHAR. 4. MANOJ KUMAR SON OF YOGENDRA SINGH, R/O VILLAGE HARNAHI(EAST) P.S. SHIVHAR, DISTRICT SHIVHAR. 5. MAHESH PRASAD SON OF JAGDEO SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KAMROULI, P.S. PIPRAHI, DISTRICT SHIVHAR. 6. HARENDRA KISHORE SAHANI, SON OF LATE GAYA SAHANI, R/O VILLAGE CHATOUNI, P.S. TARIYANI, DISTRICT SHIVHAR. 7. SURENDRA RAM SON OF RAM PRATAP RAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE LADOURA, P.S. TARIYARI, DISTRICT SHIVHAR---PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE GOVT. OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 3. THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 4. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND LAND REFORMS, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 5. THE COMMISSIONER TIRHUT DIVISION, MUZAFFARPUR. 6. THE COLLECTOR-CUM-DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SHIVHAR---RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02. 10.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioners are the Assistants-cum-Clerks. They were appointed against the Advertisement No. 16/1998 issued by the Bihar Public Service Commission. They have filed this writ application for a direction to the State Respondents to consider their case for grant of revised pay scale of Rs.4000-6000/-, as according to them other similarly situate persons had approached this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 13577 of 2006 for similar relief, which was allowed under order dated 17.12.2007, Annexure-6 to this application, against which the State Respondents preferred L.P.A. No. 522 of 2008, which was also dismissed under orders dated 29.9.2008, Annexure-6/1 to this application. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that their case - 2 - is also covered by the aforesaid two orders dated 17.12.2007 and 29.9.2008, Annexures-6 and 6/1 to this application. 4. Let the District Magistrate, Shivhar consider the representation of the petitioners as contained in Annexure-7 to this application in the light of the aforesaid two orders dated 17.12.2007 and 29.9.2008, Annexures-6 and 6/1 to this application and pass reasoned order in accordance with law as early as possible, in any case within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. In the event, representation is allowed, it goes without saying that petitioners be allowed the consequential benefit. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)