IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20039 of 2011 Mukesh Yadav & Anr. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3 28.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioners are accused in this case with allegation of inflicting simple injury upon informant and others. Earlier one criminal case had already been alleged by the mother of the petitioners against the prosecution side. Further this case appears squarely covered under the decision of Apex Court in a case of Jorgia Pentiah Vs. State of A.P. reported in 2009 (1) BCCR 153 (S.C.). Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the petitioners, namely, Mukesh Yadav and Tuthu Yadav, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gaya, in Rampur P.S. Case No.72 of 2011, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. as also to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. AnilKrSinha (Akhilesh Chandra,J.)