IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21440 of 2011 1. Omprakash Sah 2. Ghanshyam Sah 3. Sudhir Sah 4. Shriram Sah alias Shri Ramji Sah , all sone of jainarayan Sah, all resident of village- Sehudwa, P.S Yogapatti, Dist- West Champaran. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 6.7.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Yogapatti P.S. Case No.9 of 2011 registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that there is general allegation against all the accused persons and no specific allegation is attributed to any of the petitioners to cause injury to any one. It has also been submitted that the injuries said to be received by the injured, namely, Brijhan Sharma, Jhakadi Sharma, Sanjay Sharma and Kaushalya Devi are simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. It is also submitted that the present case is a counter blast of 2 Yogapatti P.S. Case No.08 of 2011 lodged by the petitioners’ father against the informant and others. The allegation is that all the accused persons assaulted the informant, Brijhan Sharma, his brother, Jhakadi Sharma, his nephew, Sanjay Kumar and his wife Kaushalya Devi by means of lathi causing injuries to them. Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners stands rejected. However, it is made clear that the trial court will not be prejudiced by this order at the time of hearing of the regular bail petition of the petitioners and the same shall be disposed of on its own merit taking into consideration the nature of the offence. Namita (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)