IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7341 of 2009 JAGNARAYAN SINGH SON OF LATE RAGHO PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF Q.NO. L/18, DALUIANAGAR, P.S. DEHRI, DISTRICT ROHTAS AT SASARAM Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE JOINT SECRETARY, MINOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ROHTAS (BIHAR). 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DIVISION SASARAM CAMP, DEHRI, DISTRICT ROHTAS. 5. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 6. THE PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER SASARAM, ROHTAS. 7. THE TREASURY OFFICER, ROHTAS. ----------- 2. 02.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. After some argument learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievance as raised in the writ application, petitioner proposes to file a detailed representation before the respondent no. 4 In case such representation is filed within a period of four weeks alongwith certified copy of the present order and also enclosing the relevant documents if any, in support of his claim, the respondent no. 4 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievance of the admissible retiral dues could be paid without delay. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. JAGDISH (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)