SINGLE BENmi IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (s) No.é..%§%o1o t K PETITIONERS 1. Kuleshwar Prasad PaTel, Son of Shm’ Tika Ram PaTeU; aged 43 years, Working as Shiksjha Karmi Grade—I, GovT. Higher Secondary School, KhaTTi, ‘Dis‘rricf Mahasamund,- R/o. Village Haldi, Pos’r Ghoch, PiThora, DIS‘rricT Mahasamund (C.G.) r Smf. Chi’rr‘a KhaTkar, W/o. Shri Jagdlsh Prasad Khalkar‘ aged 3O year's, Working as Shiksha Karmi Grade—I, GovT. “Higher Secondary School, KhaTTi, Dis’rricf Mahasamund, R/o. Infrom‘ of Jalshri Polfri form, Raipur, DisfricT Raipur (6.6.), Anll Kumar Verma son of Kar‘rik Ram Verma, aged abouT 34 years, Working as Shiksha Karmi Grade-II, GovT. Girls Middle School, Jhalak, DisTricT Mahasamund, R/o. Ward No.2, ImlibhaTa, ,Mahasamund, Dis’rric‘r Mahasamund (C.G.), Hirdelal Dhruv, Son of Johan Lal Dhruvuaged 3O years, Working as Shiksha Kgllgfmi Grade-III, GOVT. Girls Middle School, Jhalak, DisTric’r Mahasamund, 'R/o. Village Gu’rrudih, \ PosT Lahangar, ,Tahsil and Districf Mahasamund (6.6.). 5 / Keval Ram Sinha Son of Komal Singh Sinha, aged abou‘r 31 years, Working as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, Govt. Girls Middle School, Kamr‘oud, Dis’rr‘ic‘r Mahasémund, R/o. and Dis‘rric’r Village Lahangar, Tahsi l Mahosamund (C.6.). VERSUS / 1. The STa’re of Chha’r’riSgar‘h, Through The Principal Secrefary, Depar‘rmenf of School Department Manfra—laya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) / . 2. Dis’rric’r Educa’rion Officer, MahasamundDist—Mahasamund (C.G.) 3. (/Chi‘ef Executive Officer, Janpad Panchaya’r, Mahasamund, Disfricf - Mahasamund (C.G.), RESPONDENTS WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA E ,_£.§. w ‘20..aQuQMgHQ , mafiazawuw NEnmrwawuw i ,k 9g»? u <¢g wiaw‘aawuaao, m§n a 0a. . ”wgw m wmawcogmawon.En m5 £59,? mgrvagag Uwm. 6% Q > mowEn mg”? .Gcgmaw a 3 . $5 Rwgaag£m§$ wEuEunm Q5» tate counse.l submts that te ahension‘frxe etitioner S i h pweotf ps i s pr‘pmature and‘ they have duly fIHr-d the apphcatbn forms, th ! % uthority eOncé \éuld‘ act pufsiialif'to thé decision tak¢n b t { ! mite} Government vide letter dated ‘19. 11% 10 *n the facts and cimumsfances of e case, as’nothing‘siixvive‘ I n the pétitian; it is disposed of with a ' tion m thc‘ competc § 1 i n thiority toplermit the petitioners to appear inthe exam'ihaflon tub on 28.11.2010 an 29.11.2010 tor the post of Head Maste “ r§ ui's'nant tothe decision takeh‘ by the State Government subject to: he ‘llex‘ihcation of the fact._‘that the peu'trs ave e n er :: orm!’ and the eatne have been dul ccepted by the» authority e f the rievance of the etitioners stiil suxvives, they would be“ t 'terty to approach this’Oour L Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker ' udg 1 a a w y he S . ‘I s 5 a e .p3 t ione h mld i thi .f y é § co cemd ‘I g p } a g t. t Je ( > t t t i 1 t t