IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19468 of 2010 INDAL BIND Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 03.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. It is a case of road robbery of informant and pillion rider which is corroborated by several witnesses asserting that miscreants fled towards East and a witness in paragraph-32 states about going of this petitioner along with others towards Mahadev Asthan and again returning but speed is shown different that was fast while returning. As about age, it was month of February at 7.30 pm. wearing of some additional woolen cloths i.e., moflar, chader is probable asserted by this witness in paragraph-32 also. So, the difference of age in the F.I.R., that is in between 15-20 and 35-40 makes no difference. Several probabilities about appearing of evidences are there in cases of robbery and dacoity after apprehension of the accused including confession leading to recovery identification. So, I find it not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)