1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9121 OF 2009 Kirti Jagdish Mulani........ Petitioner versus Jagdish Mulani ........Respondent. Mrs. Sharmila U. Deshmukh adv. for the Petitioner Mr. Nranjan Pandit with Mrs. Nidhi Singh i/b. Joy Legal Consultant adv. for the Respondent. CORAM: A. P DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 17th November, 2009. P. C.: 1. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner for sometime, she does not press the petition and seeks permission to withdraw the petition. However it is pointed out that there are two admitted documents in the nature of (1) Deed of Family Arrangement dated 26-3-1991 and the other is Gift Deed dated 22-11-2005 which according to the learned counsel for the petitioner needs to be permitted to be placed on record. Both the petitions i.e. one filed by the husband bearing no. 2608/07 which is for divorce and the petition bearing no. C-58/08 filed by the wife for maintenance under section 18 of Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act are clubbed together. The learned counsel for the 2 respondent points out that the said two documents are already placed on record in petition no. 2608/07 and the same are at serial no.1 and 26 in the compilation of documents filed by the husband. In that view of the matter no order need to be passed in that regard. However in the event if it is found that the said two documents are not on record, the petitioner is permitted to place the same on record. The petition is therefore dismissed as not pressed. (A. P. Deshpande, J.)