~TB r c s <g <a XK THE HIOH COURT OF JVWCATOSK AT miASPOR. WBIT vsntmsi »o., ..*' PETITIOKBK; ^•^- <>J-^^--""" -•••*'''^<--*.>r\-)••••'' ^y 3^6^ /2006ief SMT. tM-ITA KAWDAVI {Now Smt.LaHta Mandawil w/o Bhun^sh Mandavi A^d about 37 Yrs. AsttuGrade HI Geaeal Fwest , Cucle Katdssr, Present Address ' Resident of, Village Sidesar, TahsH and District Kanter^ <?<<.... l^-"" VERSUS SSSVOKDEXn'S: 1. 2. 3. ^\/• L- STATE OP CHHATnSGAIOI Through Secretaiy, Department ofForest. D.K.S. Bhawan Maatralaya, Raipur. (C.G.) COBSBRVATOR OP FOREST Porest Circle Kanker District Kanker. (C.G.) DIVIiKOnrAI. FORBST OFFK^ General Forest Circle Kanker Distdct KaxAer. (C.G.) ^\^^trr nBCTnoa WtD®tAIITICI-E 226 /227 oy THE S»^^msTiTOTioK or nnoiA FOR THE ISSUAWCE OF MRECTIOa (St OR ORDBR (Sl. MGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH: BILASPUR SiagleBench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W. P. Bo. 3665 of 2006 Petitioner Respondents Versus Smt. Lalita Mandavi State of Chhattis9arh & others Shri Prakash Tiwari, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the reqiondents/State. OKDER (Passed on 4th Day ofJaausu-y, 2007J 1. I.A. No. 27/2007, an application filed on behalf of petitioner for withdrawal of petition on the ground having become infructuous. The application is ordered as prayed for. 2. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subhash aSi^