BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighteenth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13823 of 2011 1 POOCHENDU 2 MEENA 3 MURUGESSWARI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Vs STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE T. RAMANATHAPURAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.27/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. K.MURUGAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for offences under Sections 294(b) 323, 324 and 506(ii) in Crime No.27 of 2011, the petitioner has come up with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of prosecution, it is alleged that the accused persons attacked the de-facto complainant with iron rod. 3. It is submitted learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioners are innocent and they have nothing to do with the alleged offence. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the injured has discharged from the hospital. 5. Having regard to the fact that the injured has already discharged from the hospital and all other attending circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, but with conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Usilampatti on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks. The petitioners 2 and 3 shall report before the respondent police as and when required for the purpose of interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. sd/- 18/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1 USILAMPATTI 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE T. RAMANATHAPURAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. K.MURUGAN Advocate SR.No.36166 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13823 of 2011 Date :18/10/2011 SMA/20.10.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/