1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No.927 of 2009 (Anant Vitthal Kalbande v. State of Maharashtra) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri F.T. Mirza, Advocate for Applicant. Shri D.P. Thakre, APP for Respondent. Coram : R.M. Borde, J. Dated : 6 th July, 2010 This is an application seeking quashment of the criminal proceedings initiated by the State against the accused for commission of offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 472 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The prosecution is initiated in pursuance of FIR No.104 of 2007 registered at Police Station Mahagaon, Tahsil Mahagaon, District Yavatmal. An affidavit-in-reply is presented by the State, wherein it is asserted that there is ample evidence against the accused/applicant to present a chargesheet to the Court. It is also specifically stated in para 6 of the affidavit-in-reply that the investigation by the Investigating Officer is over and the chargesheet would be presented to the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class against the accused/applicant within a period of six weeks. Considering the averment made in para 6 of the affidavit-in-reply, I do not deem it appropriate to cause interference at this stage. The accused/applicant would have liberty to avail of 2 remedy prescribed in law and present appropriate application before appropriate forum. In this view of the matter, no interference is called for. The application is, therefore, rejected. Judge. pdl.