IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.551 OF 2006 The Bombay Stevedores Association.. Petitioner Ltd. V/s. Union of India & Ors. ... Respondent Ms. Henna Doulat i/b. Khaitan & Jayakar for the petitioner. Mr. N.V. Masurkar for the respondent No.1. Mr. U.J. Makhija, Sr. Counsel i/b. Mulla & Mulla & C.B. Caroe for respondent No. 2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, : F.I. REBELLO, : F.I. REBELLO, ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 05th April, 2006 : 05th April, 2006 : 05th April, 2006 P.C. . The relief as claimed in the petition is for recovery of money. On behalf of respondent No. 2 Shri V.S. Kulkarni has filed his reply. In para 3 of the said reply, it has already been set out that amounts lying with defendant No. 2 have been adjusted based on the letter written by respondent No. 2. Those amounts have been paid to the staff of members of respondent No. 2. The members of petitioner are still owing amounts to respondent No. 2. Civil Suits have been filed for recovery of balance amounts which are pending. If that be the case, even if it is contention of the petitioners that respondent No. 2 is owing money to them, that can be agitated in the ( 2 ) pending suits. Even otherwise, as pointed out, the petition is purely for recovery of money and it would not be a fit case for this Court to exercise its extra-ordinary jurisdiction. 2. In the light of that, petition stands disposed of. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]