IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26703 of 2009 CHITRANJAN KUMAR @ CHITRANJAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 5.2.2010 After some arguments Shri Akhileshwar Pd. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the application with a liberty for moving the court below for grant of regular bail. However, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that even during the investigation the alleged mobile number was found to be in the name of one Chandeshwar Manjhi and petitioner has got no connection with the said mobile. It is also submitted that the petitioner and informant of the case has come to compromise by filing a compromise petition before the court below. If the petitioner appears before the court below and prays for grant of regular bail, the court below without being prejudiced with this order, will examine the case on its own merit and consider the stand which has been taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner that during investigation the alleged mobile was not found in the name of the petitioner and other materials available on record. The court below may examine all these materials and pass order on the same day. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed. The anticipatory bail petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. (Rakesh Kumar, J) M.Rahman