IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31245 of 2010 RAJU YADAV @ RAJESH KUMAR, SON OF LATE LALMUNI GOPE, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAKSUDPUR, P.S. FATUHA, DISTRICT PATNA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 12.10.2010. Heard Shri Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri A.M.P. Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Shri Dhurjanti Kumar, learned counsel for the informant has filed Vakalatnama. The sole petitioner, who is in custody in Fatuha P.S. Case No.154 of 2010 for the offence under Sections 498-A, 308/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is rotting in jail since 3.6.2010. Shri Dhurjanti Kumar, learned counsel for the informant has vehemently opposed the prayer of the petitioner. Learned counsel has submitted that in the entire case diary, all the witnesses have supported the prosecution case. Learned counsel has specifically 2 N.H./ referred to paragraph-15 of the case diary to show that from the bed of the informant, smelling of kerosene oil was noticed. Accordingly, he opposed the prayer for bail. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Shri A.M.P. Mehta has also opposed the prayer for bail. Keeping in view the period of custody and nature of accusation, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in Fatuha P.S. Case No.154 of 2010. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)