HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.6651 OF 2010 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of the first respondent in not passing orders, either on the stay petition or in the revision petition filed by the petitioner against the order of the second respondent in CMA.No.57 of 2008 dated 30.01.2010, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice. The petitioner would submit that the second respondent had entertained CMA. No.57 of 2008 filed by respondents 5 and 6 herein and, by order dated 30.01.2010, had confirmed the order of the Special Deputy Collector (TW), Bhadrachalam, directing the petitioner’s eviction. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner filed a revision petition, along with an application seeking stay, before the Government. Both the Revision petition and the stay application are said to be still pending and no orders passed thereon till date. On the ground that the respondents are seeking to dispossess him from the lands in question, in the interregnum, the petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Sri M.U. Hanumantha Rao, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, would contend that the second respondent was not justified in taking up CMA.No.57 of 2008, filed by respondents 5 and 6 herein, without taking up the appeal filed by the petitioner herein. The petitioner has neither furnished the number of the appeal said to have been filed before the second respondent nor is it his case that he had sought that both the appeals be clubbed and taken up together. In any event these are all matters which can as well be agitated before the Government in the pending Revision petition. Having elected to avail the remedy of filing a Revision petition before the Government, it is not open to the petitioner herein to simultaneously invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. I see no reason, therefore, to entertain the writ petition or to grant the relief sought for therein. Ends of justice would be met if the first respondent is directed to hear and decide the stay petition, filed along with the Revision petition, at the earliest and, in any event, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. However, in the circumstances, without costs. RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J Date:25.03.2010 Usd/mrkr