THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No. 21651 of 2002 DATED: 31-01-2007 Between: Livewell Home Finance Limited, Office at 1st Floor, Sahara Manzil, Opp: A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad, Regd.Oﬃce at 94, Minerva Complex, S.D.Road, Secunderabad, represented by its Recovery Officer, I. Srinivas. …Petitioner. and The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad and others. …Respondents. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No. 21651 of 2002 ORDER: Alleging interference by the respondents and their oﬃcials into the day-to-day business of the petitioner without any authority of law, the writ petition is filed. The petitioner is a Housing Finance Company advancing loans for the purpose of purchase/construction of houses or ﬂats. The 3rd respondent availed a housing loan from the previous management of the petitioner-Company for the purchase of a ﬂat bearing No.309, R.K.S. Apartments, Hyderguda in the year 1997 and had repaid the total loan amount to the previous management itself. The present management took over the petitioner-Company on 24-08-2002 and is unaware of the transaction between the 3rd respondent and the previous management. According to the petitioner, the 3rd respondent is insisting the oﬃcials of the petitioner to deliver the documents allegedly submitted by the 3rd respondent to the previous management of the Company. No such documents are available with the petitioner. On the complaint of the 3rd respondent, the 2nd respondent is interfering with the personal liberty of the oﬃcials of the petitioner-Company without authority of law and without instituting and registering any complaint. It is alleged by the petitioner that its oﬃcials are being called by the 2 nd respondent every day for no apparent reason. The writ petition is ﬁled on the above allegations seeking appropriate relief. The 2nd respondent has ﬁled a counter-aﬃdavit denying speciﬁcally all the allegations in the writ petition. The answering respondent states that the oﬃcials of the petitioner-Company were neither called to the Police Station nor was the respondent was interfering with the personal liberty of the officials of the Company. This counter-aﬃdavit was ﬁled on 06-11-2002. No rebuttal to the averments in the counter-aﬃdavit is on record. In the circumstances and in the context of the speciﬁc denial of the allegations in the writ petition, which have not been rebutted, no case is made out for proceeding further. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. Interim order dated 30-10-2002 stands dissolved. __________________ (GODA RAGHURAM, J) 31st January, 2007. IBL