1 Criminal Application No.4045/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4045 OF 2010 Abdul Majid s/o Abdul Aziz & anr. ... APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & anr. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri N.G. Shah, Advocate holding for Shri N.S. Ghanekar, Advocate for applicants Shri K.S. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent No.1. Shri A.G. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent No.2. ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 11th February, 2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard. The controversy between two step brothers lead to prosecution in pursuance to Crime No.I-639/2009, dated 17.12.2009, registered at Kranti Chowk Police Station, Aurangabad for an offence undre Sections 452, 324, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Reading the F.I.R., it is explicit, the parites are facing controversy over immovable properties. Injury certificate concerning or corresponding to the so called injury suffered by complainant is not surfacing. On the contrary, the grievance of the petitioners is, there was no injury to the 2 Criminal Application No.4045/2010 complainant. 2. Now, the learned counsel for the original complainant submits that the parties have patched up their relations since they are residing in the same house. The respondent No.2 has not sustained any injury in the incident. Consequently, he did not approach any medical officer and no medical evidence. Since Section 452 IPC was applied, it is not compoundable, learned Judge could not do it. Considering the nature of accusations, the proceedings against the petitioners herein are quashed and set aside. Criminal Application allowed. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/cri4045.10