LPA/1165/2007 1/3 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No. 1165 of 2007 In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 16187 of 2007 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SHARAD D.DAVE ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= BHARUCH DISTRICT PANCHAYAT THRO' - Appellant(s) Versus DEG MUNSHI GULAM AHMED - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MS SEJAL K MANDAVIA for Appellant(s) : 1, MR PP MAJMUDAR for Respondent(s) : 1, ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SHARAD D.DAVE Date : 21/08/2007 LPA/1165/2007 2/3 JUDGMENT ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) Heard learned advocate Ms. S.K. Mandavia for the appellant and learned advocate Mr. Majmudar for the respondent. 2. There is a consensus between the advocates, stating on instructions, that the respondent will make a fresh representation to the appellant within a week from today and the appellant, on receiving such a representation, will take a decision thereon in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation and intimate the respondent about the decision thereon. 3. Learned advocate Mr. Majmudar states that if the appellant – authority, while considering the representation to be made by the respondent, calls him for personal hearing, the respondent will unfailingly appear before the authority on the appointed date and time. 4. The Letters Patent Appeal, thus, stands disposed of in above terms while setting aside the order of the learned Single Judge. No order as to costs. ( A.L. Dave, J. ) ( Sharad D. Dave, J. ) hk LPA/1165/2007 3/3 JUDGMENT