ETITIONER @ .^. . fivilib?l Bench THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. N0. ^>.°>5zh2005 S?C7 Jt ^y/ /aS^/ ^/ !~y/^y ^" ?yy .<? 1»" RESPONDENTS 1. Erstwhile Mewar University Sponsored body Mewar Education Society, Raipur Through^: Its Vice Chancellor/ Chairman Professor Umashankar Goel Aged about 62 years S/o. Shri GANGA SAHAI R/o. Sector-2, Shanker Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through its Chief Secretary Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Department of hligher Education (Technical Education), Jana Shakti Niyojan and Science Technology, Through : Its Additional Chief Secretary, Raipur (C.G.) -1- SNoiloaaicTao Noiioayra 'syaayo ao aaaao 'siiaMyo iiaM aiviadoaddv yod QNV oia snwvaNViAi 'iyvyoiiyao loaanivN 3Hi NI iiaM 3oaoNvnssi yodviaNi do NOiiniiiSNOo do 9zz anoiiuv aaaNn NOiiiiad iiyM ('O'O) Jndse|ig '. jejisiBey si| : ij6nojqi . jndseiig AtisjSAin sepiseqQ njng •s •s> . (•9'0)Jnd!By ; ,':;.' -•' '.••Ty»--: JBJisiBsy s}| . i-|6no'jqj;' ^llSJSMUn ei^nqg JB>|UBL|s!Aey l!pued 'ld 'fr iqieQ W9N 'eiBis^ ;y| 'xsidiuoo spod9 iqpueo BJipui 'UBLUjieqo ' : si| L|BnojL|i (aioiv) uoiieonpg leoiuqosi joi iiounoQ Bipu| ||V '£ Mis^. BSfc H!*«II •esw^) ^S(«4i't|i<yt<i,yfll'i-i'is, faoiyy .......^!.^.:.......Sl2.r?A...•^2QOS~ a^?na»ci^i^?) ^^SHT ^^Bwfi iRarax ^iftB ai^i D{\flSLQN^CNCLI: lillfcKll'f t<W<'il'4fe^ tRi«T;r ^3lfiCT3?I^r BK? itie',' - Iff"'".' i 3: KSK VSKS vf-'I® HON'BLESHRIA.K. PATNAIK, CJ| &HON'BLE SHRI S.K. AGNIHOTRl. 22/07^005: Heard Mr. Gautam Khetrapal| * Mr. V.V.S.Murthy leamed Dy; Advc|i teamed Govt. Advocate for the StaW lleamed counsel for ttie petitioner and ^ate General with Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, ofChhattisgarh/respondents1&2. N|j! Ccturt dafed The pefitiQner, the ershwhik University under the ehhatBsgarh Aur Viniyaman) Afftimiyam, 2002 chaltented before ths Supreme Another Vs. State of Chhattisge|i No.19pf2004. By thejudgment said writ petition,the Suprems Court & 6 to be uttra vires and qugshed) Governmsnt in the Gazette m Section 5 of the Act notitying Ui judgmsnt, the Supreme eourt interest of the students who may estabfished by such private appropriate measures to have existing State UniversiUes in Chhat judgment, the Supreme Gourt furth^ for afRSiatk'n of ihe institutions the a!regdy existing Stete Universt contained in paragFafrti 45 ofttiejut Mewar University, was notified as NHi KshetraVishwivklyala^ (Sthapana \(fsr short theiAct). The Act was in the case of Prof. Yashpa! & je|rh & Others in Writ Petition (CiviO da^sd 12th February 2005 delivered in the : declarsd the provisions of Sections 5 |ths notifications issued by the State purt»6rted exsrcise of Vne powers under itivereifies. In paragraph 45 pf the held that in order to prot t tt'e |)e adually stadying in the insBtuUon s, the Stat& Govemment may tete instittitions affiiiated fo the already Itisyirh. In paragraph 46 of e said i^r observed that steps may be taken sta^lished^by^suchpmrate pniversiBes tc» <(ies in accoTdancs Kcith the stirecUon jytlgment and fhat fhe parties WKsuld toe fctUer universjties sucli XI-HC—78 '5^ •^[•'•iK'f^, Biil'y'is, fqoiyy *ll*«*ll'^fflW••—••-••••••—••—•• "•-••••"—^(^ 200 311^1'TX^ (•yil3«l<i4) •^ SV^S ^SI R;4i'=b [^>. tt^l 3H^?T ^Wi<^ n '^arar •Hfta sii^iT —«2-' ^niBerty to ^pproacn me^-ngfl. implsmentation ofthe direction. <sbi^i<'i41'i tiw^f ^r 'fec^ ^(t$i< ^TsiRprai^i Court7 1T^ny,-aispute arises in 2. Pursuant to the said directior|s jn paragraphs45 & 46 of the said judgment of the Supreme Court, Stsjtute No.27(A) tiUed as "Admission of Interim Institutions to the privilege^ of the University and withdrawal thereor has been framed and cla(ise 5 of the said Statute No.27(A) provides as follows: "xxx xxx xxx, a^ interim institution wll be admitted to the privileges of th< temtorial jyrisdiction of ESU fo interim insthition wilt be admitted ti a ESU on the basis ofthe \ affiliation, as speoified in Second Scheclute ofthe above stiidAct on application ofthe SponsoringBodyofthe Interim litistitution andttie sameshal! be withdrawn thereof in the marfner in the parasfnertioned . hereinafter." ^ In the aforesaid clause 5 ofthe St^tute No.27(A), it is provided thatan the privileges of the ESU (Existing Stete Universities) on the basis of|he territoriat jurisdiction of ESU for afR'iation. The aforesaid clause|does not make any provision for admission of interim institution to |the privileges of the existing State Universities if the instjtution is beylsnd the temtoria! jurisdiction of the existing State Universities forafRliafiqn. 3. The petitioner has its Univerefty locatsd at Raipur but has opened up two study centres at Ghaziabac| and Ctiittorgarh, which are located outside the temtoria! jurisdicfion of tt)e State of Chhattisgarh and ths said two study centres locatsd outeide th^ State cannot, therefore, be adrai<ted ^A-; ;XI-HC—78 VS3 • w— sN^c^ifco* iitfaiT3n^T??TiN? '^;:;t ifci 'S^ '^wifi'ti, yTil'M<ie, foiwray lfl^TWT^»*fl<*> •^200 ?iTnq> (y'3'"^) ¥^tW^ffsa an^'1 •i- lUndsrtheaforesaidclause 5 oftt +I^I<'l*ft^ 'RFRtf ^ "fe^ ^^K ^3tRn3ii^r to the prh/jleges 6f existing State l|niyersities in the State of ChhatBsgarh e Statute No.27(A). For this reason, they have challenged the vires of|the aforeeaid clause 5 of the Stattute No.27W. 4. We find that in paragteph 41 of the aforesaid judgment in the case of Prof; Yashpat & Another^Vs.ptate of-Chhattisgarh & Others, the Supreme Court hasclearly held tt(at in v'sew of the provisions of Article 245(1)0f the Constitution, ft is o<ily Pariiament which is competent to make Laws fpr the whote or any| legislature of the State can make State but not for any territoiy beyoi|i part ofthe terisitory of India and the 1 '.. • aws for thewhole or any part of the d the Stateand therefore ths Act was be^»nd the legislative competer^ce of tte Chhattisgarh L^islature inasmuch as it enabled a UniveTsit^ to have an off-campus centre outeide theStats. ;^t 5, In view of the aforesaid clea cannot possibtY entertain this writ p^tition challenging the vires ofclause 5 of Statute No.27(A) which confines to the privifeges of the existing S temtorial jurisdiction of the existin! which does not provide for adini r judgment of the Supreme Court, we the admission of aninterim institution tate Unwereities on the basis of fte jState Universities for afRliation and ^sion of off-campus centres tocated QUtside the territory of the Ghhatti^garh to the privileges of ths existing State Uniyersities ofthe State of Chjhattisgarh and we accordingly, dismiss the same. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge