IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 936 of 2008 Sanjiv Sharma and Another ….. Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand & Ors. ….. Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate for the respondent no.3. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. None for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate for the respondent no.3. 2. Learned Brief Holder for the State submits before this Court that it has been indicated in paragraph-2 of the supplementary counter affidavit that the police has completed the investigation and after completion of investigation the police has found that there is a prima-facie case against the petitioners, namely, Sanjiv Sharma and Smt. Priyanka Sharma, and as such the police has submitted the charge-sheet before the Circle Officer concerned. It was further submitted that in view of above the writ petition filed by petitioners seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them has, now, become infructuous. As such, the police is likely to submit the charge-sheet before the court concerned in the near future. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. However, interim order dated 14.01.2009 shall remain operative till the chargesheet is filed before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 09.04.2009 Virendra