-(1)- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1646 OF 2007 Qasimbee Mohd. Salim Sheikh. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents. .. Mr.Naveen Chomal, Adv. for the Petitioner. Mrs.A.S.Pai, APP, for the Respondents-State. .. CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 03, 2007. DATED : SEPTEMBER 03, 2007. DATED : SEPTEMBER 03, 2007. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. The learned APP states that C.R. No.220 of 2007 relates to the offence punishable under Section 354 of Indian Penal Code which is a bailable offence and the police authorities have not refused to grant bail in cases of bailable offences. She, however, states that there is no cooperation from the petitioner and he has not -(2)- even approached the police authorities in the course of investigation. In case the petitioner approaches the police station in relation to C.R. No.220 of 2007 which is in relation to Section 354 of Indian Penal Code, question of refusal to grant bail would not arise. We accept the said statement. 3. In view of the above statement by the learned APP, nothing further required to be dealt with in the Petition. Hence, Petition is disposed of while accepting the said statement [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]