HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 23rd March, 2011 1st Bail Application No. 1142 of 2010 Order on the bail application of the accused. Haneef Bada S/o Mohd. Khan @ Mohd. Jaan ……. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party In F.I.R. No. 187 of 2010 U/S 395 and 412 I.P.C. Police Station Bazpur District Udham Singh Nagar Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Shri Harsh Pal Sekhon, the learned counsel for the applicant and Shri S.S. Adhikari, the learned A.G.A. for the State. A charge of robbery has been levelled against the applicant. The looted jewellery was also recovered. It is alleged that the applicant was also identified. Be that as it may. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court finds that the other co-accused Shakil Hazi and Raheem-U-Din who had a similar role and against whom the looted property was also recovered have already been enlarged on bail. Consequently, the Court is of the opinion that the applicant is also entitled for the similar relief. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant be enlarged on bail on his executing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 23.03.2011 Shiv