1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2904 OF 2011 Moinuddin Vaziruddin Qureshi Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Petitioner in person present. Mr.D.P.Adsule, APP for State. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATE : 21st December 2011 PC : 1. Heard petitioner in person and learned APP for State. The above criminal writ petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure challenging the order dated 9th August 2008 passed by the District Judge, Pune below Exhibit-1 in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.3630 of 2011. The petitioner was accused no.1 along with other accused in Sessions Case No.44 of 1991 for the offence under section 302 of Indian Penal Code. The petitioner and other accused were acquitted by the Sessions Judge by his order dated 30th June 1994. However, In appeal before this Court, all the accused except brother of the petitioner herein named Shafi were acquitted. The sentence of said Shafi has been confirmed. 2. Thereafter on 1st August 2011 the petitioner filed aforesaid application in the Sessions Court. He sought following reliefs :- "a. The Hon'ble Court may please allow this application and give justice to the applicant; b. Call for record and proceeding of the said case i.e. 2 Sessions Case No.44 of 1991 from the record room; c. Examine and peruse the entire material in order to arrive to a true conclusion regarding examining a witness who was not a Government Servant/Sasoon Hospital Doctor; d. Kindly clarify as to under what circumstances and to give reasons as to why such a Doctor was examined; e. Any other relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper to the present case." A perusal of the prayers shows that the petitioner is making grievance regarding appreciation of medical evidence in Sessions Case No.44 of 1991. The petitioner doubts the veracity of the medical certificate given by Dr.Atul Jawade. He claims that the medical certificate issued by the said doctor is false. This application was rejected by the Sessions Court by order which is impugned in this petition. 4. There is nothing on record to substantiate the allegations. In any event, the case was disposed of in the year 1994 and the appeal against that order was also disposed of by this Court in the year 1998. In the absence of any evidence to support the allegations of the petitioner, in my opinion, the Sessions Judge was justified in passing the impugned order. No ground is made out to interfere in my jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petition is, therefore, dismiss. (RANJIT MORE, J.)