Criminal Misc. No. M-19308 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 12.7.2011 (1) Criminal Misc. No. M-19308 of 2011 (O&M) Harnek Singh .. Petitioner v. The State of Punjab .. Respondent (2) Criminal Misc. No. M-19448 of 2011 (O&M) Gurjant Singh and others .. Petitioners v. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Ashwani Verma, Advocate for the petitioner in Criminal Misc. No. M-19308 of 2011. Mr. K. S. Sidhu, Senior Advocate with Mr. G. S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners in Criminal Misc. No. M-19448 of 2011. Mr. K. S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. R. S. Bains, Advocate for the complainant. ... Rajesh Bindal J. This order will dispose of the above mentioned two petitions, as the same arise out of one FIR. The petitioner in Criminal Misc. No. M-19308 of 2011 is 80 years old. He is father-in-law of the complainant. The dispute is pertaining to the possession of land owned by the family. Criminal Misc. No. M-19308 of 2011 [2] Considering the age and there are no specific allegations against the petitioner regarding injury to any of the person of the complainant side, the interim bail granted to the petitioner by this court on 27.6.2011 is made absolute. As far as Criminal Misc. No. M-19448 of 2011 is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the petition qua petitioner No. 1-Gurjant Singh son of Chand Singh as he will surrender in the court below and seek regular bail, considering the injury allegedly caused by him to Roop Singh. Accordingly, the petition qua petitioner No. 1 is dismissed as not pressed. As far as petitioners No. 2 and 3 in Criminal Misc. No. M- 19448 of 2011 are concerned, the injuries attributed to them were found to be simple in nature. They were carrying Dang. It is also a fact stated in the court that Lakhwinder Singh and Jagga Singh, who have been attributed gun shot, have already been arrested. Considering the aforesaid facts, in my opinion, custodial interrogation of petitioners No. 2 and 3 is not required. They are directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 26.7.2011 at 10.00 A.M. In case of arrest, petitioners No. 2 and 3 shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. They shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for further investigation. They shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petitions stand disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 12.7.2011 mk