IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD FIRST APPEAL No 1767 of 1984 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE KSHITIJ R.VYAS and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- HARUNKHAN FIZULKHAN Versus GUJARAT STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. First Appeal No. 1767 of 1984 MR AR THACKER for appellant MR BR SHAH for Respondent No. 1 DELETED for Respondent No. 2-2/2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE KSHITIJ R.VYAS and MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA Date of decision: 18/11/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE KSHITIJ R.VYAS) Learned Counsel Mr.A.R.Thakkar appearing for the appellant states that the appellant expired during the recent riots in February 2002. He further states that he has sent Regd. Ack.Due letter to the heirs of the appellant, however, he has not received any instruction so far. Under the circumstances, since the appellant has expired, the appeal abates and the same is disposed of accordingly. Interim relief, if any, shall stand vacated. (Kshitij R. Vyas, J.) (D.W. Waghela, J.) Sreeram.