IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 1182 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 04.12. 2008 Kuldip Singh ...... Appellant Versus Parkash Singh and another ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Tejinder Pal Singh, Advocate for the appellant. **** Ajay Tewari, J. This appeal has been filed against the concurrent judgments of the Courts below decreeing the suit of the respondent for a decree of separate possession by way of partition. Learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to deny that the appellant did not lead any evidence in support of the written statement he had filed. In the circumstances I find no reason to take a different view and hold that the questions of law proposed do not arise. Consequently the appeal is dismissed. No costs. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE December 04, 2008 sunita