WPMS No. 1193 of 2005 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. I.P. Kohli, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the respondents. Before the hearing could begin, the learned counsel for the petitioners made a submission that if reasonable time of six months is granted, the petitioners would vacate and hand over peaceful possession to the landlord. The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that concurrent findings of fact has been given and that there is a finding that the tenant has already taken another shop which fact has been brought on record. Considering the fact that the release application was filed in the year 1998 which was allowed by the trial court and affirmed by the lower appellate court and without going into the merits of the case, the court is of the opinion that another six months will not hurt the landlord since the writ petition is being dismissed only on this ground that the tenant wants six months’ time to vacate the premises and the matter may not be heard on merit. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed and the petitioners are directed to vacate and hand over peaceful premises to the landlord/opposite parties on or before 28th February, 2011 provided the tenant pays the entire arrears of rent, if any, on or before 30th September, 2010. Rent/damages for the month of September till 28th February, 2011 would be paid @ Rs. 1,000/- p.m. The rent for September to December shall be paid by the petitioners in advance @ Rs. 1,000/- on or before 15th October, 2010 and the rent/damages for the month of January and February would be deposited before the trial court on or before 7th January, 2011. The amount so deposited can be withdrawn by the landlord. If any of the conditions is not complied by the petitioners, it would be open to the landlord to proceed with the eviction of the petitioners forthwith. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 30.08.2010 Shiv