IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWPT No.14422 of 2008 Date of Decision: September 23, 2011 Sunder Singh ..Petitioner Versus H.P. Housing & Urban Development Authority. .. Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Dinesh Thakur, Advocate. __________________________________________ Surjit Singh, Judge (oral) Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after the filing of the present matter, fresh DPC has taken place and the petitioner has not been considered for promotion, though a post reserved for his category, i.e. SC category, was available. Learned counsel says that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, in view of this development, with liberty reserved to him to file fresh petition, on the same cause of action, in case of need. Prayer granted. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to file fresh petition, on the same cause of action, if so desired. September 23, 2011 (ss) (Surjit Singh), J. Whet her report ers of t he l ocal papers may be al l owed t o see t he j udgment ?