IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1031 of 2008 HARIHAR RAI & ORS Versus AMAR KUMAR ----------- 2 23.07.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioners. The impugned order rejecting the application of the defendants/petitioners for removal of the Advocate Commissioner already appointed by it, needs no interference by this Court inasmuch as the Court below itself has clarified that if need be the petitioners can later on avail the services of another survey knowing Advocate Commissioner. Such satisfaction of the Court below, therefore, as to which category of Advocate Commissioner would be required to look into the matter and submit its report always vests in the Court below in terms of Order XXVI Rule 9 read with Rule 10 C.P.C.. This Court therefore cannot substitute its opinion in such matter. This Civil Revision application is accordingly dismissed. BCJ (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)