IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 11237 of 2009 Between: Peddi Venkata Koteswara Rao S/o. Subba Rao R/o. H.No. 409, Srinivasa Nagar, Bank Colony - III, Ring Road, Vijayawada - 8, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Revenue Dept. Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Inspector General Stamps and Registration Andhra Pradesh, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3 The Registrar Guntur Guntur District. 4 Peddi Subba Rao S/o. Peraiah R/o. Laxmipuram, Guntur, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Revocation Deeds bearing Document Nos. 2644/09 and 2645/09, dt. 19-12-2008 executed by the 4th respondent and got registered before the 3rd respondent as illegal, void, arbitrary, contrary to law, violative of Article 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also the principles of natural justice and consequently to set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.PEDDA BABU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.NO.11237 OF 2009 ORAL ORDER The writ petition is misconceived. No public law grievance arises herein. It would appear that the petitioner’s father-the 4th respondent on 03-02- 2006 executed registered gift deeds bearing document Nos.1123 and 1125 of 2006 bequeathing certain properties in favour of the petitioner. These gifts were accepted and acted upon by the petitioner. Thereafter it is alleged, the 4th respondent executed two revocation deeds bearing document Nos.2644 of 2009 and 2645 of 2009 on 19-12-2008 revoking the earlier registered gift deeds. Assailing the revocation by the 4th respondent, the writ petition is filed. No grievance involving any public law rights arises for consideration in this writ petition. The petitioner has an effective alternative and exclusive remedy of impeaching the deeds of revocation in accordance with the applicable substantive and procedural laws before the civil court of competent jurisdiction in an appropriate proceeding. On the aforesaid analysis the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the appropriate remedies. No costs. _________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 10th JUNE 2009 *TSNR