\^^ BEFORE THE HON'BLEHIGHCOURTOF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR FIRST APEAL fMISG.1 N0. €^0 /2010 Djvision Bench 'va;./ /f APPELLANT ION- APPLJCANT J. \l^ ^'.'*- ,^w ^.^ ^^^" .sf^' RESPONDEN 2 APPLICANT ^.Smt. Anjali Chandel w/o Shri Manharan Lal Chandel, aged about 35 years, R/o village Manikchauri, Tahsil & Police Statio- Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.) At present residing at Shri Himmat Lal Khute, Father's name not known to appellant R/o village Chhachhapairi, Tahsil & Police Station Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS ^-Manharan Lal Chandel s/o Shri Babul Lal Chandel, aged about 38 years, R/o -village Manikchauri, Tahsil and Police Station Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.) APPEAL U/S 19 OF FAMILY COURT ACTFOR ENHANCEMENTOFAMOUNTOFMAINTCNANCE \. c'»i ^f \-.:.. HIGHCOURTOFGHHAmSGARHOTBILASPUR DIVISIONBENGH:HON'BLEMR.I.M.QUCa>USI& tlON'Bl.EMR^MlNHAJVtMMN.JJ. Appellant Non-aDDlicant Respondent ApDlicant FirstAppeal (Misc.1 No. 20 of 2010 Smt. Anjali Chandef Vs Manharan Lal Ghandel (Appealundersecton 19 oftheFamilyCourtAGQ Present: Mr. SureshTandan, counselfw the appellant. Mr. Anumesh Shrivastava, counsel (iEX-the respondent ORDERfOrall (27u'June,2®11) Per I.M.Qu<Musi. J; Leamed eounsel for the appellanlsubmits that the l»»tantappeal hasbeGome infnK^uous as final order has already been passed. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuou?— Sd/- I.M.Quddussi Judge Sd/- G.Minhajjudin Judge •'< . ./'". •' \ '- ^' s^