^l." (.. HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISOARH,_BILASPUR WRiT PETITION (S) N0. 6859/2Q10 PETiTIONER Man Raj Singh, S/o AgarSai, aged about 54 years, Headmaster (Primary) Govt. Primary Schooi, Biioaro, Biock Baikunthpur, Djstt. Korea (C.G<) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. State of Chhattisgarh Through:- The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Rajpur Dlstrict Education Officer, Baikunthpur, Distt. Korea (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Biock Balkunthpur, Distt. Korea (C.G.) WRIT PETiTSON UNDERARTiCLE 225 OF THE CONSTSTUTION OF JNDIA Appearance: Mr. Anil Singh Rajput, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Pane! Lawyer for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (2S.11.2010) SUNIL KUIVJAR SINHA.J. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that theissue invoived in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitied to reguiar pay scaie w.e.f. the date of initia! appointment or from the date of completion of probation period.He submits that the issue invoived hereirs was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Admjnistratlve TribunaJ, Jabaipur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. and others), wherein.it was he!d that the similarly situated teachers are entitied to reguiar pay scale v/.e.f. the date of initia! appointment. The matter was taken up to theHon'bie Supreme Courtin Speclal Leave Petition (Civii) No. 6892/93. The Said petition was dismlssed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholdlngthe decision of the Tribunal to the ei¥ect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initiai appointment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits thatthis Court, while considering the same issue in Ram Kumar Sahu and others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another (W.P.(S) No. 813 of 2007) by order dated 12.2.07,has granted regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. WRIT PETSTION (S) N0. 6859/2010 Learhed counsel for the parties jointly submits that this case is squareiy covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Ram Kumar Sahu and another (Supra) In view ofthat, this petition is ailowed in the same terms. However/this order shall be subject to aii verifications made by the State regarding facts pieaded in the petition. 1 Sd/- Sunil KumarSinha Judge