1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3757/2006 (Rampratap Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) Date of Order : 11/05/2007 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. M.S.Purohit for the petitioner. Mr. B.L.Tiwari, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the respondent No.1. Ms. Kusum Rao for the respondents No. 2 and 3. BY THE COURT:- Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in Rashtriya Khadi Board Karamchari Union, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 6381/93 decided on 12.8.2004. The order passed in Rashtriya Khadi Board Karamchari Union came to be affirmed by Division Bench of this Court in D.B.Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 717/04 decided on 27.5.2005. Learned Deputy Government Advocate appearing for the respondent State submits that the judgment of the Division 2 Bench was carried to Hon'ble Supreme Court by way of Special Leave Petition, but the Hon'ble Supreme Court has dismissed the S.L.P. In this view of the matter, the decision of this Court referred herein above, has attained the finality and concludes the controversy involved in the instant case. The Division Bench in D.B.Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.717/04 (supra) held that “admittedly, when the benefit of pension after approval of the State Government has been extended to the employees of the Board, the employees working in the commercial centres, are also employees of the Board. Therefore, there is no justification to discriminate the employees of the commercial centres of the Board.” In this view of the matter, the instant writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed by this Court in Rashtriya Khadi Board Karamchari Union, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 6381/93 decided on 12.8.2004 as affirmed by the Division Bench in D.B.Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 717/04 decided on 27.5.2005. There shall be no order as to costs. (H.R.PANWAR),J. rp