IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1190 of 2010 Between: Dasari Nagendra Babu ..... Petitioner AND Mr. A. Yadagiri, Inspector of Police, Begumpet Police Station, Hyderabad & another. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri Manu Counsel for the respondents : AGP for Home The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1190 of 2010 ORDER: This contempt case is filed alleging willful disobedience of order dated 09.03.2010 in Writ Petition No.8743 of 2009. This Court under the abovementioned order disposed of Writ Petition No.8743 of 2009 with the direction to respondent Nos.5 and 6 therein to complete the investigation in Crime No.36 of 2009 and file appropriate charge sheet/report before the jurisdictional Magistrate within a period of six weeks. Alleging willful disobedience of the said order, the petitioner has earlier filed C.C.No.813 of 2010, which was disposed of by this Court on recording the statement of the learned Assistant Government Pleader that the investigation was completed and a final report was already filed before the jurisdictional Magistrate on 10.05.2010. Alleging that the respondents have made a false statement before this Court and that no such final report was filed before the learned Magistrate, the petitioner filed the present contempt case. In view of the above plea of the petitioner, this Court passed an order on 30.08.2010 directing the Registrar (Judicial) to obtain a report from the learned Magistrate concerned. Accordingly, the learned XI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad, submitted his report dated 31.08.2010, wherein he has reported that the respondents have filed final report in Crime No.36 of 2009 on 10.05.2010 and that the matter stands posted to 16.09.2010. In view of the said report, I do not find any reason to proceed further against the respondents in the contempt case. The contempt case is accordingly dismissed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 20.09.2010 ES