IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1720 OF 2008 Mr.Sanjeev Nagnath Mali ..... Petitioner V/s. Hadapsar Vidyalaya & Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.M.L.Patil, for the Petitioner. CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. DATED : JULY 11, 2008. P.C. 1. By filing this petition under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged interim order passed by the School Tribunal, Pune, Appeal No.79 of 2006. In the pending appeal before the Tribunal, the appellant gave an application by which the appellant asked the respondent management to produce certain documents. 2. The Tribunal rejected the said application. The Tribunal also held that the inquiry committee has to observe the principles of natural justice and management cannot be said to be a inquiry committee. The Tribunal rejected the application on the ground that it is not tenable. It is also held by the Tribunal that since the matter is for final arguments, it would not be proper to entertain the application. 3. In my view, now when the appeal itself is pending for final argument before the Tribunal, it would not be just and proper to intercept the proceedings at this stage. This Court, when the matter reached finality before the School Tribunal, would not like to interfere at this stage in its extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. However, it will be open for the petitioner to challenge the final order on all available points including the point raised in the application before the Tribunal, as well as the point raised in the petition in case the petitioner is required to challenge the order of the Tribunal by way of petition. Subject to the same, petition is dismissed. ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)