1 wp 4744.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4744 OF 2011 Khan Khairmohmed Husen Khan .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri A. S. Zarekar, Advocate for the Petitioner. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 06TH JULY, 2011. PER COURT : . Shri Zarekar, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the impugned order has been passed by the Deputy Director Land Records in its powers U/Sec. 247 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. If an order is passed by an authority exercising appellate jurisdiction U/Sec. 247 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, then the statute provides for a revision U/Sec. 257 of the same. Shri Zarekar, the learned counsel states that remedy of revision is not an alternate remedy and moreover, even if the said remedy is available, still this Court can exercise its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In 2 wp 4744.11 view of the fact that remedy by way of revision is available, I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of in view of the fact that remedy U/Sec. 257 is available to the petitioner. The petitioner is at liberty to avail the said remedy. If the revision is filed by the petitioner, the authority shall consider the time spent in prosecuting the present writ petition and shall make an endevour to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible. The writ petition is disposed of. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/July 11