IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH Civil Rev. 6068 of 2008 Date of decision: 20.8.2009 Iqbal Singh Petitioner vs Surjit Singh Respondent Present Mr. Munishwar Puri, Advocate Mr. Karanjit Singh , Advocate M.M.S.BEDI,J. The application for correction of the judgment and decree has been dismissed by the court below. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent. In the present case if the plea of the defendant, raised in the counter claim, is seen, it is apparent that he had purchased land measuring 8 kanals. The counter claim of the defendant has been allowed and the plaintiff has been restrained from taking forcible possession of the said 8 kanals. It is apparent that in paragraph 19, relief column, instead of 8 kanals, 10 kanals 5 marlas has been inadvertently typed. The same mistake seems to have occurred in the decree. It was a fit case where exercising power u/s 152 CPC, the error should have been rectified. The revision petition is allowed and it is ordered that the words 10 kanals 5 marlas, mentioned in paragraph 19, relief column, and in the decree will be corrected as 8 kanals. However, khasra numbers, mentioned subsequent to the said area will remain the same. The trial court or the successor court is directed to make necessary correction in the judgment and decree. August 20 ,2009 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE