IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48711 of 2005 LAXMI PRASAD SINGH son of Ram Sunder Prasad, Resident of village-Salha Chandan, P.S.-Sihma, Dist.-Samastipur. Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 18.2.2010. Heard Mr. Ram Balak Mahto, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay, learned counsel for the State. The petitioner by filing this petition has challenged the order dated 5.7.2005 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in Mali P.S. Case No.43 of 2004 whereby cognizance for the offences under sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code has been taken. Learned counsel for the petitioner while pressing the petition has referred to annexure-5 to the petition and submitted that though in the present case he had been charged that he was appointed on forged document which was enquired into by the Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna, respondent no.3, and the District Education Officer, Aurangabad/Samastipur, was directed not to take any action against the petitioner. While hearing a petition under sections 482 Cr.P.C. this court is not inclined to look into those documents, which have not been collected during the investigation by the investigating agency. The order of cognizance also does not indicate any infirmity and, as such, the petition stands rejected. The petitioner, if so advised, may raise all these points at appropriate stage before the court below and the court 2 concerned will examine the matter on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)