IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1769 OF 2007 Baitulla M. Tarukdar ....Petitioner V/s. Rajendra Padia & Anr. ....Respondents Mr.Khan Javed Akhtar for the Petitioner. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 25TH JULY, 2007. P.C. : 1. No interference is called for. The Petitioner claims the arrears of rent of Rs.2,57,000/-. The trial Court ordered a deposit of the rent at the rate of Rs.646/- per month from July, 2006. Against that order, the Petitioner filed a Revision Application, in which the impugned order was passed. 2. As recorded in the orders, the Petitioner’s contentions have been kept open. Even the impugned order is against the interim order and the rights of the Petitioner regarding actual arrears has been directed to be heard at the trial of the suit. This is not a fit case for interference. The Writ Petition is dismissed.