IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28827 of 2009 UDAY KUMAR @ UDAI SHANKAR THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 28.08.2009 Heard both sides. Learned counsel fairly submits that he is not in a position to press this application on merit, in view of the allegations that have been levelled against him in the F.I.R. He however, states that the petitioner is in custody since 21.8.2007. Referring to para-6, it has been contended that only four prosecution witnesses have till date been examined. It is thus, contended that there is no likelihood of the trial being concluded in near future. Considering the aforesaid aspect of the submission made by the learned counsel, this Court is persuaded to dispose of the present application in the following manner:- Let the trial court conclude the trial by examining all the prosecution witnesses within 05 (five) months from the date of receipt/ communication of the order in the court below, failing which the petitioner shall have liberty to renew prayer for bail. 2 With this observation, this application is dismissed. P.K. (K.K. Mandal, J.)