1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Criminal Application No. 960 of 2010 in Criminal Appeal No. 105 of 2010 (Umesh Manik Jadhav V. The State) Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. Joydeep Chatterji, learned Advocate holding for Mr.P.B. Gapat, Advocate for the applicant Mr. N.H. Borade, APP for the respondent / State PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. I am not inclined to release the appellant on bail, mainly because the appellant did not apply for bail after his arrest. He waited for the trial to get over. The second reason why the bail should be refused is, though apparently the case is quite arguable, the learned Judge of the lower Court heard the witnesses, saw their demeanor and believed the case of the prosecution, especially the words of the complainant / victim. 2 3. The appellant is entitled to expedite the hearing of the appeal. The office is directed to make the appeal ready for hearing and shall fix it for hearing in the second week of June, 2010 i. e. 14th June, 2010. Date : 23 April, 10 [A.V.NIRGUDE,J.] SRM/