$JMLE 3mm g, ‘ 10 a /’ Q @ M EN THE HONOURABLE HIGH COERT OF CHHATTESGARH AT BILASPUR WRET PETETION (S) N0. §2 V 2— 0f 20H C PETH‘IQNER: // Kashi Ram Khastri, S/o Bisahu Ram, Aged about 46 years, Post6d as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Chorhabhaina, Block Bilha, District Bilaspur, (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS:/l) ’ Tlle State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, raipur (C.G.). The Director, Directorate of Public Instructions, Raipur (C.G‘) The Collector Bilaspur, District .Biiaspur (co) The District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). The Headmaster, Govt. Middle .School, Chorhabhaina, Block Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 0 @ HkGH CGURT GF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETiTiON (S) NO. 5212 (3F 281i (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india) Singie Eenc‘h : Hon‘bie Shri Sati$h K. Agnihotri. J. Piesent :— Shi'i Siwivang Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao. Government Advocate for the State. GRDER (ORAL) {Passed on this 07““ day of Septembet, 2m 1) Kashi Ram Khasta'i Versus RESPONDENTS The State 6f Chhaftisgafh & Othefs 1. Learned counset appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working as Upper Division Teacher, as he was promoted from the post of Heaemastér to Upper Division Teacher by order dated 11.{35.201O (Annexure P-3). The petitioner has been transferred by the impugned order dated 15.012011 (Annexure P-1) as Headmaster, Primary $choo! and he is aiso not working at the piace, which has been shown in the transfer order, as the petitioner is working in Middie Schooi at the same piace, not in the Primary Sohooi. 2. Be that as it may. Shri Sao, iearned Govt. Advocate appearing for the State respondents submits that the defect, if any, shaii be verified and if it is found that there is a defect. this order to that effect. shaii p. he cancetied, in the meantime, tiii a fresh order is passed, no effect or" the impugned order dated 15.G7.2Gi'i (Annexure P—1). in respect of the oetitioner, shaii he given. 3. in view oi foregoing. iearned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for adiudication in the matter at this stage. 4. Aeoordingiy. the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. ashok Agnihotri Judge 1 re