^. IN THE HIGH COURT OE* JUDICATURE CHFIATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NQ. -^(n^ /2002 PETITIONSR Ramjatan Bhardwaj S/o B» Bhardwaj Aged about 32 years^ R/© Bharawaj Medical Stores^ Daili Rajhara^ Distto Durg< VERSUS RESPONDENTS l)Punjab Natlonal Bank Through its Branch Manager^ " ©alli Rajhara,Distt» Durg. • 2)U2^ion of India Through the Secretary^ Ministry of Finance^Department of Banking Division^ New Delhi<» 3)The Collectg.r, Burg Dist^ict, Durg (CC?) < ^" >f^ ^^y} ^f^ WaiT.-PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 QF THS CONSTITUTION OF IN D I A [f c, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONERS WRTT PETmON No. 505 of2002 Ramjatati Bhardwaj. RESPQNDENTS VERSUS Punjab National Bank & Others. WMT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTmiON OF INDI SB: Hon»bleShri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: None forthe petitioner. Shri P.P.Sahu, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Shri Vivek Shrivastava, Advocate fbr fhe re^potidtent No 2. 'j Shri Amn Sao, Govemment Advocate forthe State/respondentNo. 3. ORDER (Passed on 23rd day ofNovember, 2011) ^•-^ The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursiiing fhe matter. In view of tfae above, the matter is dismissed for waiit of prosecution. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge Ashok