THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.29553 of 1995 ORAL ORDER: It is the case of the petitioner that he was appointed as Laboratory Attendant in the first respondent College with effect from 1.9.1981 on a consolidated pay of Rs.225/- per month. After fourteen years, the services of the petitioner were regularized from the date of his first appointment and subsequently, the first respondent college was taken over by the University. The time scale of the petitioner was fixed at Rs.290/- vide proceedings dated 27.11.1986 though, he was entitled for a pay scale of Rs.410/- per month as per the revised pay scale of 1978. Aggrieved by the said action, petitioner filed W.P.No.13411 of 1995 and the same is pending. While the matter stood thus, a vacancy of Lab Technician arose as one V.Visweswaraiah was promoted as Medico Social Worker. Therefore petitioner made a representation for considering his case in the said vacancy. The respondents without considering his case, promoted the third respondent vide proceedings dated 8.12.1995. Aggrieved by the same, petitioner filed W.P.No.22552 of 1995 and the same is pending before this Court. In the similar circumstances, some of the aggrieved persons have approached the A.P. Administrative Tribunal by way of filing R.P.No.17 of 1985. The A.P. Administrative Tribunal, in view of the judgment of this Court in W.P.No.2519 of 1972 dated 3.7.1974, allowed the said R.P. by order dated 15.4.1986 and directed the respondents to revise the seniority list on the basis of petitioner’s original date of appointment as Lab Attendant and further directed that the petitioner be considered for promotion as Laboratory Technician by virtue of his original seniority. The sum and substance of the complaint of the petitioner is that without preparing the seniority list in the cadre of Lab Attendants, promotions were affected to the post of Lab Technician. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on merits, the first respondent is directed to treat the very writ petition as representation of the petitioner and consider his grievance and shall pass appropriate orders as per law after putting the petitioner and other affected parties on notice, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 31.10.2006 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.29553 of 1995 31.10.2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.29553 of 1995 Date: 31st October, 2006 Between: A.Prasada Rao .. Petitioner And A.P. University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, rep. by its Registrar, Vijayawada & another. .. Respondents