HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 2535 OF 2010 Friday, the Second day of July, Two Thousand and Ten Between D.David Raju Petitioner AND The Society for Integrated Development in Urban & Rural Areas, Rep.by its Secretary Smt. T.Nanda Vardhan Respondent THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 2535 OF 2010 ORAL ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 28.04.2010 passed in I.A. No. 117 of 2010 in R.C. No. 86 of 2006 whereby the learned IV Addl. Rent Controller, Hyderabad, has dismissed the application filed under Rule 7(5) of A.P. Rent Control Act, 1960 praying to receive certain documents by condoning the delay. The petitioner herein filed the above R.C. seeking eviction of the respondent, arrears of rent and mesne profits. It is his case that along with the R.C. he could not file the document i.e. Constitution of the Society and its Members List, which is very much essential to prove his case and since he obtained the same recently from the Registrar of Cooperative Societies, it may be received. The court below dismissed the petition observing that no sufficient cause is shown by the petitioner for not producing the document at the time of filing the R.C. and also went on trial keeping in view the contents of the counter filed by the respondent. Aggrieved thereby, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. As observed by the court below, sufficient reason is not shown as to why the document sought to be filed now, could not be filed earlier at the time of filing the R.C. It appears the petitioner also went on trial keeping in view the contents of the counter. On a perusal of the order impugned in this Revision Petition, I am of the considered view that no grounds are made out to interfere with the finding of the court below and I do not see any illegality or irregularity in the order impugned. Consequently, the Civil Revision Petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari July 2, 2010 MAS