IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 16TH BHADRA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 940 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.21039/2011 Dated 16/08/2011 .................... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS: ------------------------------- 1. SUMOD.K.S, AGED 30, S/O. PURUSHOTHAMAN, KAKKASSERY HOUSE, KARITHALAPARAMB, C.P. UMMER ROAD, ERNAKULAM. 2. DEVANAND, KOIMADATHU VEEDU, KARITHALAPARAMBU, C.P. UMMER ROAD, ERNAKULAM. 3. KISHORE KUMAR, KALAKKASSERY VEEDU, KARITHALAPARAMBU, C.P. UMMER ROAD, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.JEEVAN MATHEW MANAYANI RESPONDENT/7th RESPONDENT: ----------------------------------- SUNEESH BABU, AGED AROUND 45, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CENTRAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM - 682 031. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT. K. MEERA. THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Con.Case(C).No. 940 of 2011(S) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A1 : CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.21039 OF 2011 DATED 16.08.2011 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. ANNEXURE A2 : TRUE OCPY OF THE LETTER DATED 17.08.2011 ISSUED BY THE COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS TO THE RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE A3 : TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 20.08.2011 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONERS TO THE RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE A4 : TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILEDBY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE ESPONDENT DATED 28.08.2011 IN PERSON. /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE J.Chelameswar, C.J. & P.R.Ramachandra Menon, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Contempt Case (Civil) No. 940 OF 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 7th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT Ramachandra Menon, J. The contempt petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience in respect of the judgment in W.P.(C) No.21039 of 2011 dated 16.08.2011. 2. The respondent/contemnor has filed an affidavit stating that the averments and allegations raised in the contempt matter do not keep the right track of truth. It is also stated that all earnest efforts have been taken for extending the Police Protection as ordered by this Court and that the judgment has been honoured in the right spirit and perspective. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is satisfied with the explanation offered in the affidavit. In view of the specific averment in the affidavit pointing out that the respondents are ready and willing to continue to extend the police protection, taking Contempt Case (Civil) No. 940 of 2011 -:2:- appropriate action against the culprits, as and when necessitated, no further orders are necessary. We record the above submission and the Contempt Petition is closed accordingly. J.Chelameswar, Chief Justice. P.R.Ramachandra Menon, Judge. ttb