CRM No. M-17079 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. M-17079 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.08.2009 Gurpreet Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. O.P. Nagpal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab. Rajan Gupta, J. This is a petition for regular bail in a case registered against the petitioner under Sections 392, 454, 120-B IPC at Police Station City Malerkotla, District Sangrur, vide FIR No.233 dated 29th November, 2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. He has been in custody for quite some time and thus he deserves to be enlarged on bail pending trial. Learned counsel for the State has, however, vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. He has submitted that allegations against the petitioner are very serious in nature and Section 397 IPC has already been added in the case. According to the State counsel, the petitioner was caught on the spot. CRM No. M-17079 of 2009 2 I have heard learned counsel for the parties and given careful thought to the facts of the case. A perusal of the FIR shows that allegations against the petitioner are quite serious. He was caught on the spot while committing the crime. The allegation against him is that he committed robbery and inflicted injuries on the person of Anita Singla, who was found profusely bleeding. A gold chain was also snatched from her. I, thus, find no ground to extend the concession of bail to the petitioner. The petition is hereby dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE August 17, 2009 'rajpal'