H!GH COURT OF CHHAniSGARH AT BIU^SPUR W.P.No. 2125 of 2007 Petitioner Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Vipin Bihari Agrawal, S/o Shri Ram Bhajan Agrawal, Aged about 53 years, R/o ViHag® Datsn, Tahsit Paiari, Distrirt Raipur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarti, Through Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Devetopment Ctepartment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). Coltector, Raipur (C.G.) Chief Exscutive OfRcer, Janpad Panchayat, Palari, Distt. Raipur (CG) Tahsitdar, Paiari, Tahsit Paiari, District Raipur (CG). Radheshyam Sahu, Sarpanch, 'itiiiage Panchayat, Datan, Tahsil Paiari, Di'strict Raipur (CG) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Jusfee Satish K. Agnihotrj, J Shri vaibhav A. Goverdhan, Advocate for the petrtioner. Miss Deepaii Pandsy, Pane! Lavsyer for the respondsnte No. 1.2 and 4. ORDER (Passed on this 5th day of April, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, sesks to mUidraw Shis petiSon, wit'i iiberty to take recourse to the other alternative remedy that may be available to the petitioner, undsrthsiaw. 2. Learned counsel appearing for ttis respondents/State has no objecfion. 3. The petifon is dismissed as wthdrawn, witti the aforestated liberty. Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge