IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 16TH JULY 2010 / 25TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 22348 of 2010(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- S.RAJAN, PAY WARD ASSISTANT, TALUK HEAD QUARTERS HOSPITAL, PUNALUR, STATE VICE PRESIDENT, KHRWS STAFF UNION (INTUC) GENERAL HOSPITAL CAMPUS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.RAJESH SMT.A.K.PREETHA SRI.K.M.ALEXANDER RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-685001. 2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HEALTH DEPARTMENT & VICE CHAIRMAN, KERALA HEALTH RESEARCH AND WELFARE SOCIETY (KHRWS) GENERAL HOSPITAL CAMPUS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-685001. 3. KERALA HEALTH RESEARCH AND WELFARE SOCIETY (KHRWS) GENERAL HOSPITAL CAMPUS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REP BY IS MANAGING DIRECTOR-685001. 4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA HEALTH RESEARCH AND WELFARE SOCIETY (KHRWS) GENERAL HOSPITAL CAMPUS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-685001. SR.GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.NANDAKUMAR SRI.M.AJAY, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.22348 OF 2010(P) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T Prayer sought in this writ petition is to direct the 4th respondent to pass orders on Ext.P9. 2. The case of the petitioner is that, by Ext.P1 resolution, the governing body of the 3rd respondent resolved to refer the regularization of 29 casual cleaners in the existing vacancies to the Government for consideration. According to him, there was no progress in the matter, and therefore, representations were made, and finally by Ext.P7, petitioner was informed that though Ext.P1 resolution was passed as above, the matter was not taken up with the Government for consideration. In these circumstances, petitioner has filed Ext.P9 representation to the 4th respondent requesting him to take follow up action based on Ext.P1 resolution. In this writ petition what is sought for is a direction for consideration and passing orders on Ext.P1. 3. If as stated by the petitioner, Ext.P1 resolution is still in force, petitioner is justified in his claim that follow up action on the WPC.No. 22348/2010 :2 : resolution needs to be taken. 4. Now that this issue has been raised by the petitioner before the 4th respondent in Ext.P9, I direct the 4th respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P9, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/