1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 22. WP/1285/2010 ( SANJAY CHANDER MEHTRE V/S ASSOCIATE DEAN AND PROJET OFFICER VETERINARY COLLEGE, UDGIR) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.K.M.Nagarkar, Adv., h/f Mr.A.M.Nagarkar, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. R.G.Shirsat, Adv., for respondent. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:29/10/2010 1. Heard. rejection of statement of claim of petitioner in Reference (IDA)_ No.4/2007 by learned Presiding Officer for Industrial Disputes and Judge, Labour Court, Latur, dt. 18.8.2009 is questioned by the employee - the petitioner. 2. Before the authority, the writ petitioner could not establish having put in continuous service. The record illustrated that he was on temporary position, effective from 1.4.1992, to 24.9.1992 i.e. for six months. He approached the authorities after 17 years. Prior thereto, his earlier exercise in 2 terms of ULP No.30/1998 under Section 28 of Maharashtra Recognition Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act came to be rejected. His revision, being ULP No.257/2004 was also rejected by the Industrial Court on 20th Jan.,2005. 3. The learned Judge found that there was no plausible and positive evidence establishing that the petitioner has worked for more than 240 days in the respondent organization. The order under challenge does not call for any interference. It may be that the petitioner is still given temporary assignment by the respondent authorities. It is for the Government to independently consider the case of the petitioner on its own merits. Writ Petition lacks merit, dismissed. No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/1285-10wp