IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 875 OF 2009 (MS) M/s Vishal Export Ltd. ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and another. …….Respondents. Mr. Avtaar Singh Rawat & Mr. Raveendra Singh Bisht, Advocates for petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand / respondent no. 1. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate for respondent no. 2. 16th June, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the show cause notice dated 18.5.2009 issued by Secretary, Department of Energy, Govt. of Uttarakhand / respondent no. 1 (contained as Annexure No. XIV to the writ petition). The contention of the petitioner is that vide letter dated 18th May, 2009, the detail Project Report submitted by the petitioner has been rejected asking the petitioner to show cause within thirty days. Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Avtaar Singh Rawat has fairly stated that in reply to that show cause notice, a reply has already been given by the petitioner before the concerned authority on 12th June, 2009. 2 On the aforesaid facts, therefore, when the petitioner is only aggrieved by a show cause notice and admittedly a reply to which has already been given by the petitioner barely two days back, there is absolutely no ground for interference by this Court at this stage. The writ petition therefore being premature is dismissed. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 16.6.2009 Rathour