IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 686 of 2010. Date of Decision : 5.9.2011. Pankaj Kumar alias Sonu ...... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mrs. Anju Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Nehra, Addl. AG, Punjab, for respondent-State. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) Challenge is to the order dated December 8th, 2009 passed by Judge Special Court, Muktsar whereby petitioner was ordered to be charged under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'the NDPS Act') and accordingly charge-sheeted. Learned State counsel has placed on record a copy of the report of the Committee constituted by the State Government whereby it was opined that no offence under Section 22 of the NDPS Act is made out against the petitioner. In view of the stand taken by the State Government, revision is accepted and order under challenge is set- aside. However, the prosecution is at liberty to prosecute the petitioner under the Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940 if any offence is made out thereunder. 5.9.2011 (NAWAB SINGH) SN JUDGE