1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application [APL] No. 188 of 2011 (Ashish Deorao Waghmare Vs. Kavita W/o. Ashish Waghmare) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. Amol Mardikar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Mahesh Rai, Advocate for the non-applicant. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATE : 4 th OCTOBER, 2011. Heard the learned Advocates for the respective parties. By the present application, the applicant is seeking challenge to the condition in the order dated 09/02/2011, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-2, Wardha. By the said order, the applicant was directed to pay amount of Rs.15,000/- within three months from the date of order and further directed to continue in paying maintenance allowance at the rate of Rs.2,000/- per month to the non- applicant, till final order of the case. Learned Advocate for the non-applicant submits that subsequently on 23/06/2011, the learned Additional Sessions Judge-2, Wardha, passed the order, which reads as under : “Appellant failed to comply order of stay and even did 2 not bring stay order from Hon’ble High Court. So stay stands vacated.” The copy of the said order is placed on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. Learned Advocate for the non-applicant further submits that in view of the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-2, Wardha on 23/06/2011, the application has become infructuous. Learned Advocate for the applicant did not dispute to the submission of the learned Advocate for the non- applicant. In view of the above mentioned facts, the application has become infructuous. The application is disposed of as infructuous. JUDGE JUDGE *sdw