1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2583 OF 2006 Lala G. Patharwat .. Petitioner Versus Smt.Jaitunbi B. Patharwat .. Respondent Mr.N.J.Patil for petitioner. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ DATE : 9th February 2007. P.C. . Heard Mr.Patil for petitioner. Perused the petition and the orders under challenge. In my view, during the pendency of the suit filed by the petitioner, the concurrent action of Revenue 2 Authorities in entering name of respondent in the Revenue Record cannot be faulted. The same is not liable for being interfered with in this Court’s jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Needless to state that these orders would not prevent the civil court in adjudicating the dispute pending before it and shall decide the same on merits and in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the orders of the Revenue Authority. Petition dismissed. No costs. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)