{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 260 OF 2009 Bhanudas s/o Tukaram Mahajan APPLICANT VERSUS Adhar Khandu Mahajan & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.P.B.Patil, Advocate for applicant Mr.H.D.Patil, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr.B.J.Sonawane, APP for State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 18th November 2009 PER COURT: 1. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks oral leave to add the State as party respondent. Leave granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2. Issue notice to respondents. Mr.Patil accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and learned APP accepts on behalf of respondent No.2. 3. This revision arises out of an order passed in criminal {2} appeal No.45/2007 whereby the order of conviction passed in summary criminal case No.1130/2005 came to be confirmed. 4. Today, a joint precepie is filed before this Court under the signatures of applicant (accused) and respondent No.1 (complainant), which are duly verified by their respective counsel. The amount of disputed cheque is paid to the original complainant and accordingly it is recorded in the said compromise precepie. This precepie is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification. 5. In view of the compromise precepie as the matter is settled between the parties, the order passed in criminal appeal No.45/2007 as well as in summary criminal case No.1130/2005 sentencing the applicant to suffer RI for 6 months and to pay compensation of Rs.1,50,000/-, in default to suffer further RI for one year, is hereby set aside. Revision application stands disposed of in terms of the compromise precepie. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/crirev260-09