F 331 mllyliggggyyuuquun] Q { { ‘§gm {couwf FE r luJwl ‘ J i l° A\ h V ¢ ' “ ’ IN THE HIGHQ . L€$4/ ma. No @ @ivigim £44.”; {Mal} cxvru. HEVIsICN CK >1$ UN'ER {KM/*7 SEC ICN 19 OF ‘ my. tMDHYAsTI-LAM ‘ ‘ . ‘i V. ’\, RT $ JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR. ADHRARAN Mam 1mm, 1 983 App}.1am N 0‘ M/s Swastjk Builders, through Partner ‘Rajesh Pandya 123, Madhav Nagar, Gwalior. ‘ VER§§§ Nail—AkaPLIcams M State ef Ivhdhya Fradesh, ~/ through Collector, Raipur. 2. Secretary, Irrigation Department, 'Vallabh Bhawan, /(' Bhopalo ‘» Sup erintending Engineer, Maha-naéi Jalashya Pariyojana Mandal, Rudri, Districts Raipur. Exe cutive Engineer, Division NcJ Rudri, Distxict- Raipuro State 0f Chhattisgarb, through ’ Secretary Water Resource Deptt- Bajpur ' Feeling aggrieved by Award rendered by M/.?.Arbitratien Tribunal Bhopal on‘35{9c2002 in Case No.47/1 99d partiee be on ing ihefollowing asabove,‘ facts the Applicant and grounds prefers amongst this others:- Revision ..2 V a T 3 o @ IPLICANT AP ‘ l NON-APPLICANTS State of Madhya Pradesh and others D H P , HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.R. No. 25/2004 M / s Swastik Builders Versus B:- ‘HON’BLE‘SHRI LM. QUDDUSI 8r, ON’IBLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL, JJ REéENT :~ i None appears for the applicant. ‘Shri Suryakant Mishra, Panel Lawyer lrespondents No. 3 to 5. lQOne appears forrespondents No. 1 and 2. for the ‘ _ o RA L o R D E R (28—8-2010) Per LM. wamig, J l l No one is present to press this revision for the revisionist and tihe‘idefault as per office note dated 12—2-2004 has also not l beenn‘emOved. i i - 'We have no other option except to dismiss this revision for non-prosecution. n-ptn. : " :L Sm. N.K. Agrawal 1 Judg List is being revised. Case called out. Therefore, the revision is dismissed for norosecuio i l r V \. 1 Sd/- i I.M. QUDDUSI Judge e