-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2922 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.2922 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.2922 OF 2005 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.965 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.965 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.965 OF 2006 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.Sandesh Deshmukh i/b Mr.R.A.Thorat for the Applicant Mr.R.S.Mohite i/b M/s.Tamhane & Co. for the Respondent CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: MAY 2, 2006. MAY 2, 2006. MAY 2, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Rule. Respondent waives service. It is an admitted position that in the suit filed by the Respondent, decree for possession has been passed against the Applicant in respect of the suit premises. As the Respondent has already taken recourse to due process of law, no case is made out as of today to grant interim relief. Application is rejected. Judge. Judge. Judge.