1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 5130 of 2007 (Parvati Automobiles Vs. Employees Provident Fund Organisation & anr.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATE : 5 th December, 2008 Heard Mrs. Maldhure for the petitioner, and Ms. Tanna for the respondent no.1. It is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel for the respondent no.1 that a remedy of statutory appeal before the appellate Tribunal under Section 7-I of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, has not been exhausted by the petitioner and the petitioner has approached this Court directly by filing the instant petition. It is, further brought to the notice of this Court that the appellate Tribunal is functioning. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file an appeal 2 before the appellate authority. Permission and liberty both are granted as prayed for. This Court, therefore, direct the appellate authority to entertain the appeal, in case the petitioner files it within a period of four weeks from today. Ad interim relief granted by this Court on 2/11/2007 would continue for a period of four weeks from today. Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE RMP