WP(C) 3408/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. R Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms Phukan, learned State counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4 as well as Ms Bora, learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2. The learned State counsel for the respondent submits that though a number of opp ortunities were granted by this Court no instruction are forthcoming. The learne d State counsel, however, submits that since the petitioner is claiming an amoun t of Rs. 89,196/- towards rent and according to the petitioner despite sanction the same has not been paid, the writ petition may be disposed of directing the a uthorities concerned to verify the matter and pass necessary orders in accordanc e with law. The petitioners claims that an amount of Rs. 89,196/- was sanctioned by the Dire ctor of Land Records and Survey for payment of house rent to the petitioner from 1.3.2010 to 28.2.2011 in respect of the house belonging to her. The further cas e of the petitioner is that the amount has not been released to the petitioner d espite sanction. Keeping in view the aforesaid position the writ petition is disposed of directin g the Deputy Commissioner, Hailakandi and the Circle Officer, Lala, Hailakandi t o verify the claim of the petitioner and upon verification if the said amount is found to be due and payable to the petitioner and if the said amount has alread y been sanctioned, the same shall be paid to the petitioner. The entire exercise is directed to be completed within a period of two months from the date of rece ipt of the certified copy of this order to be furnished by the petitioner before the said authorities. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No cost.