1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3747 of 2011. Decided on: 1st June, 2011. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kalam Singh ……Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. …...Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma,, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. R.D. Kaundal, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. R.K.Bawa, AG, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “ That writ of Mandamus may kindly be issued to the respondents to grant W/C status/ regularization of daily wage service with effect from February, 2004 along with arrears and 9% interest thereon.” 2. Petitioner submits that he will file appropriate representation furnishing all factual details. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered by the decisions of this Court in Mool Raj Upadhayaya versus State of H.P. and Others, 1994 Supplement (2) S.C.C. 313, Phool Maya v/s State of H. P. and Others (CWP (T) No. 10220 of 2008, decided on 17.3.2010) and Rakesh Kumar versus State of H. P. & Ors. (CWP No. 2735 of 2010). It is for the third respondent to examine the matter regarding the details furnished in the representation, if filed by the petitioner, will be duly considered by the third respondent and he shall take appropriate action within a period of four months 2 from the date of receipt of representation along with a copy of this judgment and a copy of writ petition by the petitioner before the third respondent. 3. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Sharma) Judge 1st June, 2011. (lsp/jai)