HieH.COURT OF.CHHATriSeARH AT JA^DXSH BHA'LiA. Ag. CJ. SHRI S^TISH K. J. ^. .C.C. N©.32 of 2005 < Petitwwr Mukesh Paui, S/o. Late Surendra Paui, aged-about 32 years, R/o. Tarbahar, Biiaspur, Chhattisgarh. Respondents Appjicants No.l t@ 4 Versus 1. Union of India, through : The Secretary, Ministry of Raiiways, New Dejhi. 2. ^eneral Manager, South Eastern Railway, Sarden-Reach, Kolkata (West Ben^al) (Now S.E.C. RaiSwGy, Biiaspur) 3. Divisional Railway Manaaer, South Eastern Railway (Now S.E<C. Railway) Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4. &ivisionai Mechanica! Engineer, South Ecxstern Railway (Now S*E,C, RalTway) Biiaspur, Chhattisgarh. ftespondents No, 1 to 4, Through: Tne Sr. Divisionai Persona! Officer, S.E.C. ftaiiway,. Biiaspur, Chhattisgarh. 5. The Coilector, D.istrict Biiaspur, Chhattisgarh. ApplJcation.for exten^ion of tlme on behaif of respondents No»ito4 Present: Shri Vinoy Harit; Senior Advocate with.Shri Suryakant Mishr2a, counsel for the petitioner. on 02nd Nav^mber, 2007) t-3c--: .z' The foilowing orai order of the Court was passed by H©n'bS@Jagdlsh Bhalla, Ag. C.J. By this appijcatson (M.C.C. No.32/2005) the ftatlway Authoritjes have prayed for three months further time for conveying their decision to the petitioner, We have been informed by Shri Vinay Harit that the decision has aiready communicated to the petitioner and this application has become jnfructuous. Accordlngly, this application (M.C.C. No. 32/2005) is dlsmissed as having become infructuous, • r Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge nimm?