IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8115 of 2010 RAJENDRA PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 17.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 395 of the Penal Code against unknown is of false implication. Counsel for the State points out that he has two antecedents. Considering the period of custody since 6.3.2009 and his antecedents, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 30,000/- (thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 3rd F.T.C. Ara at Bhojpur in connection with S. Tr. No. 269 of 2009 arising out of Piro P.S. Case No. 134 of 2008, in view of the undertaking given to be physically present on each date in the trial. Absence on a single date without sufficient justification to the satisfaction of the Court below shall warrant cancellation of his bail at the discretion of the trial Court so that the progress of the trial is not delayed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)