IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 16613 of 2008 Between: 1 Dandamudi Raju S/o. Venkataswamy R/o. D.No. 4-47, Kotavari Street, Bommuru Rajahmudi Rural, East Godavari District. 2 Dandamudi Bulli Rani W/o. Raju R/o. D.No. 4-47, Kotavari Street, Bommuru , Rajahmundry Rural, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector, East Godavari District at Kakinada. 2 The Land Acquisition Officer cum R.D.O., Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 3 The Govt. of A.P.Rep. by its Secretary Revenue ( Land Acquisition) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the 4(1) Notiﬁcation issued under the Land Acquisition Act in ref.No.G3/3147/2007, dt. 29-5-2007 and the declaration issued under Sec. 6 of the Land Acquisition Act dt. 28-6-2008 without passing any order on the objections submitted by the petitioners under Sec.5A of the Act as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioenrs from theirland to an extent of Ac. 0.60 cents in sy.No. 14/5B part situated at Jalimudi Village, Seethanagaram Mandal, East Godavari District in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 16613 of 2008 O R D E R: The notiﬁcation under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 dated 29-05-2007 is challenged in this writ petition on the ground that the objections to acquisition raised by the petitioner under Section 5-A of the Act were not considered by the respondents. However, the learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition, under instructions, submitted that after considering the objections raised by the petitioner, an order was passed on 17-06-2008 rejecting the said objections and thereafter a declaration was also made on 08-07-2008. In the circumstances, the relief as prayed for cannot be granted. Accordingly, recording the statement of the learned Government Pleader, the writ petition is disposed of making it clear that this shall not preclude the petitioner to challenge the order dated 17-06-2008 by working out the appropriate remedy as available under law. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 27-08-2008 KLP