-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4404 OF 2010 Sattappa Rama Powar and Ors. ..Petitioners. Versus Shubhangi Mrunal Pawar & Others. ..Respondents. Mr. S. M. Mirajkar for the petitioners. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : July 29, 2010. P. C. : 1. Heard. By the impugned order, petitioner’s application for amendment is rejected on the ground that the same is not tenable. Petitioner is opponent no.3 in the original proceedings under Motor Vehicles Act. Obviously, he cannot apply for amendment of the claim petition of respondent. Rightly, therefore, said application is rejected. I do not find any error in the impugned order. Writ petition is therefore dismissed. 2. Needless to state that the petitioner is at liberty to file appropriate proceedings for impleadment of the party invoking the appropriate provisions of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. (R.V. MORE, J.) srp