^- S.Vo^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l WRIT PETITION N0.<7? ^ l(_/2004 PETITIONER "i"tl.-f^n<t ^j^ -^"^ ^' ,Ql.^tH.G^^U? RESPONDENTS Panchram, son of Shri Rambilash Satnami, aged about 40 years, Resident of - Darri, Tah - Kasdot, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS t. Jairam Kaiwartya, resident : , of Darri, Tah. Kasdol, Distt, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ^ ^.^•^v^-- ^^.^•^.^.^•"•^Y 2. The State of Chhattisgarh, P^-^d^?^-^^""** tiirough : the District Collector; ;A®t&d"""' \ • ;:;:'c- Raipur(CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 227^F THE CONSTITUTION OP INDIA May fhis please to your Lordship. 1~;; -^- XI-HC-22 ^T^T'^ R'ii^h NIST ^fftc^'<-ti$a '^ 4^A.^iN^i^ ^^y^^^^ Nl^^TW^Kh 200 "^^r' 3TI^'^cmW1CTf^ 30.09.2004 qu^st|iibn|ing D Shri P.R. Saliu, counsel fo^f]|i Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Deputjvi HeardattI'iea|dmissiGristag4. The petitioner|has preferred^ the Constitution of India correctness of the order-datedj 2' learned Additional ©Istrict<Ju<lge, whereby learried: Additionat K 17.01,2004 passed hy leariied -<3ivil|:» Suit No;66A/20Q3 rejecting the,:apt under Order 39 Rules 1 85.2 QfC, P.1 Brief facts leading to filing petitioner's own case there is a gov| Darri, Tehsil Kasdolhbearing Khasr^, of totai area of said: grassland th^ hectares sin^e , last 201 yeara agriculti-iral operatibns' on tfaat Vlllage Barri in orcler to dispossess of tne lana convened a meeting of in question to 15 persons innder the purpose Qf plantation, those question and theyt are 'not allc^ agricultyral operations in the .petmoner. ? - -. Learned TrialiCQurt and in the matter andt'after going Cp-overnmentAdvooafeibrtheState. <^i^fd^^ ^IN<vffi^1^^<fa^ ^S^W^I^T e petltloner. ^his writ petition underArticle^^2^ the j legaliN, propriety and r,7|2004 (Annexurq P-1), passed by ©alodaBazar in .M.-C.A. No.Ol /2004 ?t! Judge affirmedj: the order dated ^udge Class-H, Baloda Bazarin Civil 3lication; of jthe petitioner herein filed ahd lof Ithis-petltion ar^ that as per the 'trriment^grassland existing/iriVillage ^ No.162/2 area 2.T03 iiectares, out ^titionerj is in pQSsession of 0.40 he is !^ontinupi.isly rdoing the [^nd. Respcuident^^.l'-Sarpa^r^^ the petitk)n€r^fromthe said portion Panchayat and aliotted the land ^scheme^ known as I'Hareli Saheli' fbr are aigging ]Mts in the land in 7ing the petitioner ;to Qperate the -which jis in possession o^ Qram pqrsons lahci ApF^llate ^llate Cour|t after hearing the parties |irough Jhe record!^ reaelied fe^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^••^^. i:-—- \ ^^;-:l'l^ft',.i XI-HC-22 3iT^T^T |Ryi5h ?:n|^r 5bHI<^'Ml^a ^^|l^^|^te^,;;||i||^ 3H^T <45(?sb fflW^II Sh*<lv^. ^200 ^•^. 3n^?ri^R?1^r •^t' conclusion that the land in! dl / grassland and t||e fpetition pQSsession or titfe^bTi;the lancijirl no prima-fa6ie" case^.] and tlie | irreparable Ibss |;re;also not ;e| fherefore, rejected the applicafioi|i As both the courts below -going through the reeoN and also failed to demonstrate that perverse and! cpntrary to the recc{ I do-nofc fin^ an^ substabnee in under !Artic}e^ 227 6f tjtie Com jurisdiGtion uiiyer Article 227 lol keeping'ttie s^ibordinate cQurfs When the subordinare .court ha^ not Have or has failed to exerci^e ] jurisdiction tKoiigh available^is |b| not perrnitted^^^^^ ^ 'occasioriecl thereby, the High| super^isory jurisdicfion. In the resylt, Kdo not find liable to be dismlssed and stage itself. ^ 4)l^?d<flT1 ^i^^'^lf^st <R[i^fi< "^ ^ri^FT'^T^T luestion is : admit^dly/ a goyen-iment Ittas hof been aNle to estabiish its quesfion, tfaerefore, tfte petitioner has ^irit^ of balance of.co^ $tablished i.n ^favoyr; of fhe petitioner, liley bythejpetttic|ner;li€^ tiav^ arrivedj tQ th^ above. frnding after CQUnsel for ithe' pefitioner herein |iow1 the findings of the c©urtbelow is trdorsetflediprincrpleoflaw,therefore, |:his^petition|:to m^okc thLejurisdiction .^titution of fcdia,f|as ttie: sypervisory thej Constitution l^n.be ^xercised ibr ^ifhin the-boundslbfitKeirjurisdiction. assymecl ajjurisdictiQfa which it'does |a junsdictioiii which |t does have or the ;ing|exercisey by;tnecourfin a manner of justi0? or igrave iryu^tice has Court may step into exercise its failiire jany substanoe in this petition, same is accor<|lingly, it is d|iBmts|sed at the admission Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge f . - .E^^^