IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 1204 of 2008. Decided on: 02.06.2011. _________________________________________________ Sudama Ram. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). It is not in dispute that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment dated 28th July, 2010 rendered a Division Bench of this Court in Rakesh Kumar Versus State of H.P. & Others, CWP No.2735 of 2010. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for conferment of work charge status strictly as per 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - law laid down in the judgment cited hereinabove, within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. June 02, 2011. (sck).