IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9608 of 2011 Urmila Devi & Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Shiwesh Mishra, Adv. For the State : Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, APP ****** 04. 12.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State who is armed with carbon copy of the case diary. Petitioners are named accused in connection with Gopalganj (Jadopur) P.S. Case No. 37 of 2001 pending the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj. In this ten years old case instituted on the basis of complaint case no. 1590/2000. The four female petitioners are also named accused but except being family members of other male accused out of whom one Suraj Mahto carries specific allegation of taking away deceased son of the complainant informant, there is nothing against these female petitioners and also other surviving male members of the family i.e. named co-accused are on bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, till submission of charge sheet, let the petitioners, namely, Urmila Devi, Kanti 2 Devi @ Kunti Devi, Manju Devi, Bimla Devi, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of court below, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)