HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER RESPONDENTS WRTT PETmON No. 2090 of2006 Diheshwar Das, aged aboirt 36 yass, aovt of Balram Das, resident of Village KhMora, P.C. No, 135/14, TahsU Abhanpur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS •\ Amit 1. State of Chhattisgaifa, throu^h Secretary, D^>artn»ent of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 2. Colleetw, Rai^rii, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Tahsildar, Abhanpur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 4. Thanwar Das, aged ab<wt 73 yeara, son of Slm Mohan Das, resident of village Khilwa, P.C. No. 135/14, Tah. Abhanpur, Distt. Raipur(C.G.) WMT PETmON UNDER ARTICU 226/227 OF TOE CONSTTTUTK)N OFWDIA. SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Afflriltotrt. J. Present: Shri Ashok SonL Advocate for Ihe petitifflier. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for fee State/respondetits 1 to 3. ORALORDKR (Passed on 11" day of November, 2008) 1. The petitioner has impugied the orda- dated 15.09.2003 passed by Tehsildar, Abhanpur, District Raipur, wherely (MI®Thanwar Das son of Mohan Das was CTanted patta in r^peet ofKhasra No. 221 and 533 area 0.12 and 0.54 hectare respectively, in case No. 32-A/19 year 2002-2803, under Revenue Book Circular 4-3. The petitiona", witiiouttaking recourse to statutory forum i.e. the Sub Divisional OfBcer (Revenue) as provided under Ihe provisions of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 has approachedtothisCourttKrectly. ; SK . 2. On query, as to why the petition be entertaiiwd, Shri Soni subnrits that since fhere were ottier orders passed by fhis Cwat ciwitained at Annexare P/2 and P/3. Thus, fhis petition is mamtainable in this Court. 3. This Court, in W.P. NQ. 2064/2000 and W.P. 2632Q060, have settted Ae law. Once the law has been settled by this Court, it is not newssary to approach tUs Court fw applicabitity ofi'lhe law as setUedsby Ifais Gtourt. The petitioner ou^it to have approached fhe statutary appellde authorfty pointing out ths deeisions ofthis Court. ; .» ,* , 4. Thus, this petition is not maintamable. However, Kberfy is res%ved to flie petitioner to take recoiuse to attemative statutwy forum Ihat m»y te available to fhe petitioner under the provisicns oflaw, ifso afeised. No order asto costs. I SatishK.Agnihotri Judge