IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 30TH JUNE 2009 / 9TH ASHADHA 1931 RP.No. 388 of 2009(E) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.1932/2005 Dated 04/02/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- T.NIRMALA, W/O. P.S. GOPALAKRISHNAN, AGED 47 YEARS, STAFF NURST GRADE I, GURUVAYUR DEVASOM, MEDICAL CENTRE, GURUVAYUR DEVASOM, GURUVAYUR. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER, O/O THE COMMISSIONER FOR GURUVAYUR DEVASOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ADMINISTRATOR, GURUVAYUR DEVASOM, GURUVAYUR 3. THE MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT, GURUVAYUR DEVASWOM MEDICAL CENTRE, GURUVAYUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. MRS. LINDA K.K., HEAD NURSE, GURUVAYUR DEVASWOM MEDICAL CENTRE, GURUVAYUR, THRISSUR DIST. 5. MRS. JULA BHAI, HEAD NURSE GURUVAYUR DEVASWOM MEDICAL CENTRE, GURUVAYUR, THRISSUR DIST. 6. MRS. SHEELA P.P., STAFF NURST GRADE I, GURUVAYUR DEVASWOM MEDICAAL CENTRE, GURUVAYUR, THRISSUR DIST. 7. MRS. RADHA T, STAFF NURST GRADE I, GURUVAYUR DEVASWOM MEDICAL CENTRE, GURUVAYUR, THRISSUR DIST. 8. MRS. SUJATHA T.K., STAFF NURST, GRADE I, GURUVAYUR DEVASWOM MEDICAL CENTRE, GURUVAYUR, THRISSUR DIST. 9. MRS. JAYAMBIKA, STAFF NURST GRADE I, GURUVAYUR DEVASWOM MEDICAL CENTRE, GURUVAYUR, THRISSUR DIST. ADV.P.NANDAKUMAR ADV.MILLU DANDAPANI. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== R.P. No.388 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 30th day of June, 2009 O R D E R The petitioner in the writ petition has filed this review petition seeking review of my judgment dated 4.2.2009. On a reading of the review petition, I find that what the petitioner wants is a rehearing of the writ petition itself, which is not permissible in a review petition. The petitioner has not made out sufficient grounds for review of the judgment. If the petitioner feels that the judgment is wrong, the remedy of the petitioner lies in challenging the same in an appeal. Therefore, this review petition is dismissed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2