HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.20932 of 2009 Dated: 24-06-2010 Between: Vejerla Devi Bhavani. … Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Home Department & others. … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.20932 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petition is filed, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the investigation conducted by the 2nd respondent Sub-Inspector of Police into the complaint made by the petitioner against respondents 4 to 12, as biased and malafide one, prepared to favour respondents 4 to 12, and consequently, to direct for further investigation by the 3rd respondent. A private complaint is filed by the petitioner before the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tuni, against respondents 4 to 12 for certain offences alleged to have been committed by them. The matter was referred to the Police by the learned Magistrate, under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., for investigation. Pursuant to such reference, a case was registered in Crime No.138 of 2008 on the file of Tuni Town Police Station, and the final report is also filed stating that only respondents 4 and 6 are liable for punishment for the alleged offences. At that stage, this writ petition is filed by the petitioner, alleging that the investigation was not properly conducted by the investigating officer, pursuant to the reference made by the Magistrate. It is submitted that the investigating agency ought to have filed report holding that all the respondents herein are liable for punishment. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the findings recorded in the final report, he can move the very same authority by way of protest application. Even according to the petitioner, no such application is filed, and he has also not moved the Court below for any further investigation into his complaint. In that view of the matter, as appropriate remedies are available to the petitioner under Cr.P.C. itself, this writ petition is wholly misconceived. For the aforesaid reasons, the writ petition is devoid of merit and it is accordingly dismissed. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved of the final report, it is open for him to file objections to the said report, in accordance with law. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 24th June 2010 ajr