1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7326/2006 (Gram Panchayat, Dangri Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) Date of order :: 07.03.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.Sandeep Shah, for the petitioner. Mr.R.S. Mankad, for the respondents. Mr.Alkesh Aggrawal, Addl. Govt. Advocate. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By way of filing present writ petition, the petitioner- Gram Panchayat, Dangri has prayed for quashing the impugned order dated 07.07.2006 (Annexure-4) and subsequent order dated 14.07.2006 (Annexure-5), so also, the order dated 07.08.2006 (Annexure-9) passed by the Collector and the Chief Executive Officer respectively. Further, it is prayed that the petitioner may be permitted to carry on the implementation of the scheme on the amended map and new land included. In para 7 of the reply, it is specifically stated by the respondents that:- “7. ...... it is submitted that since complaint was filed by the Ward Panch for not executing the Watershed Scheme, the District Collector, 2 Jaisalmer after considering the facts and circumstances of the case stopped the work vide order dated 07.07.2006 as there was dispute regarding the place. Since the enquiry is pending, therefore, the work has rightly been stopped. It is relevant to mention here that the Gram Panchayat has been asked to submit the details of the area which was included and also the details which were excluded from the scheme.” In this view of the matter, it is apparent that the enquiry is still pending. Therefore, I deem it just and proper to direct the respondents to conclude the said enquiry after providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned persons including applicants who have moved application before this Court, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. With these direction, the writ petition is disposed of. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. A.K. Chouhan/-