/ 1 / IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.587 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPLICAITON NO.181 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 Tata Motors Ltd. ...Applicant Vs. Mrs. Sunaina R. Mahtani & Anr. ...Respondents --- Mrs. Revati Mohite Dere for Applicant Shri D.P. Adsule APP for State ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 14TH OCTOBER,2008 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel on behalf of the Applicants. This is an application for substituted service on the Respondent. The learned Counsel for the Applicants submits that though the Applicants have tried to served the Respondent No.1, the packet containing notice sent by the advocate for the Applicants has been returned back undelivered to the Applicant. Even the packet, which was sent through Blue Dart Courier has also returned back undelivered with a remark “Not found”. It is submitted that, therefore, the Applicant is permitted to serve the Respondent by substituted service. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Application is accordingly disposed of. V.M. KANADE J.