IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 34355 of 2011 Lal Bahadur Yadav @ Lal Babu Yadav, S/o Late Rudal Yadav. Versus The State of Bihar ---------------- 02. 19.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 364, 365 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the case is of the year 1992 and the petitioner was in regular attendance till the year 1997 after that he could not attend the Court since he had gone elsewhere to earn his livelihood therefore misused the privilege of bail. The further submission is that the petitioner is in custody since 21.08.2011 and he has not committed any offence in the meanwhile. Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-III, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with S.Tr. No. 470 of 1999 arising out of Bettiah Muffasil P.S. Case No. 125 of 1992 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner 2 who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the brother-in-law of the petitioner namely Kamal Yadav. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be physically present on each date of trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, his bail shall stand automatically cancelled. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it positively within a period of six months in view of nature of offence for which reasons he is directed to send a list of witnesses fixing specific dates to the S.P. concerned along with the copy of this order who will ensure the attendance of the witnesses on the said dates so that there is no further delay in trial. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)