IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5738 of 2011 ABHIJEET KUMAR @ ASTAM, S/O-SUBASH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04 21.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Although, petitioner is not named in the First Information Report but in course of investigation, the name of this petitioner surfaced in this case. Some witnesses claimed before the Investigating Officer that they had seen the persons who had come at the house of the deceased persons before the alleged occurrence. In course of investigation, petitioner was arrested and he confessed his guilt. Subsequently, he was put on Test Identification Parade and the witnesses claimed to have identified the petitioner as one of the persons who had visited the house of the deceased persons before the alleged occurrence. No doubt, some co-accused persons have already been granted privilege of bail by this Court but I am of the considered view that the case of this petitioner is not identical to that of co-accused persons, who have been granted privilege of bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Muzaffarpur (East) Sadar P.S. Case No. 172 of 2010, stands rejected. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)