IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26364 of 2009 ANIL PANDEY, SURENDRA PANDEY, SHAMBHU PANDEY @ PUTUL PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.8.2009 None appears for the petitioners even on repeated calls. The case has been registered under different Sections of the IPC under the allegation that the accused persons forcibly took away Manoj Kumar Pandey, the son of the informant for getting him married to a girl and accordingly got him married. The simple question is whether an offence of kidnapping or abduction for the purposes of marriage be treated as an offence on account of not being defined by the IPC. The further question is could it be a case simplicitor under Section 365 of the IPC which could be triable by the Magistrate. Be that as it may, under the above facts and circumstances, let the above named three petitioners be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.5,000/-(five thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa under District of Nalanda in Islampur P.S.Case No.146 of 2007. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )