IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.587 of 2007 SMT.SUDHA PRAKASH & ORS. Versus MOTI CHHABRA ----------- 5. 30.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The defendants-landlords have filed this civil revision against the order dated 4.1.2007 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge II, Patna in Title Suit No.344 of 2006. By the said order, the petition of the defendants filed under Order 39 Rule 2 (A) of the Code of Civil Procedure alleging violation of the earlier order of the court dated 30.10.2006 has been rejected. From the impugned order, it does not appear that in the said petition, the defendants have alleged any specific overt act of the tenant- plaintiff which may amount to violation of the order dated 30.10.2006. From the order dated 30.10.2006, it is apparent that the learned court below has indicated the respective right of a tenant and landlord in respect of the tenanted property. Therefore, if the tenant does anything against his right with regard to the suit premises, definitely the defendants will be aggrieved by the said action and then defendants may file a petition for restraining the tenant - 2 - from doing such act. So far as petition under Order 39 Rule 2(A) filed by the defendants- petitioners is concerned, that was rightly rejected by the court below. Therefore, I do not find any merit in this application. The application is dismissed. B.T. (J.N. Singh, J.)