*1* 208-1357-09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION srj NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1357 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.876 OF 2009 Nilkanth Enterprise .. Plaintiff V/s. Bombay Textile Research Association and Others .. Defendants Mr. Samit Shukla i/b. Naik Paranjpe & Co., for Plaintiff. Mr. D.D.Madan a/w. Ms. Sushma Nagraj i/b. Bharucha & Partners, for Defendants. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 22nd November, 2010. P.C. 1 In this notice of motion, there is an ad-interim order dated 30th June, 2009, passed after hearing both sides and after perusing the affidavits. 2 I see no reason for departing from the order of the learned Single Judge, at the ad-interim stage, more particularly, because elaborate reasons are given by him for arriving at the conclusion. *2* 208-1357-09 3 Merely because Appeal is filed against ad-interim order and is stated to be pending, is no ground to postpone the hearing of the present notice of motion and adjourn the same sine die. In these circumstances, motion is allowed in terms of the ad-interim order dated 30th June, 2009. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J)