IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29348 of 2010 RAJEEV KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 12. 08. 2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being husband of the complainant is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of the Dowry prohibition Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that initially a police case was registered but accusations have been found false resulting in submitted the Final Form and on protest the present cognizance order has been passed. It is further submitted that in pursuance of the order of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, the petitioner is paying maintenance to the tune of Rs. 3,000/- to the complainant. Considering the fact that accusations have been found false and the maintenance is being paid by the petitioner and further undertaking by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he will pay arrears of maintenance amount to the complainant within a period of six weeks, let the above named petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in 2 connection Protest Complaint . Case No. 805 C of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. m.p. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)