^^ww.S^^^^^w^^wSw,.^^w^,» ^s,wsa^::.':^ ^' BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISG BILASPUR C.R.NO. 1^^ OF 2004. K APPLICANTS N0N-APPLICANTS :71. Managing Director, L'--.-^-^' •7 South Eastem Coalfields Limited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), 2. General Manager, Chirmiri Area, y S.E.C.L., Malviya Nagar, Chirmin, District Korea (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS "r""^~~ ^ ^. ^y' ^iff>" .MW^ :- 1. M/s Chandra Constmction Company, Through Partner, Sharad Gupta, son 3 ofLate Jagdish Gupta, resident of Manendragarh, District Korea (C.G.), APPLICANT -^ 2^Shri M.P. Singhal, Additional Disfa-ict Judge (Designated Judge under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996), Baikunthpur, Korea (Chhattisgarh) ^' CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ...•••:"^« ...•^v ^ ^" .6^'' ^' 3?11^T ^T f^ri^F JT^T ^H^?T sh^Jcb .\. . ~5^ r^Nl<rt^ ^tll^4l<o/ [®i<rtl^^< *iw^{ »»*iici» "—-•""•• •"y"^^200 <5? ^TT^TT?^ ( yll<s<<i?) WHW ^rf^f 3TI^T S.B. HQrs'ble Shri Justice HM Shri H.3. Agrawai, Ss. Jaisv^a!; coun»e!forthe applics Shri.H.S. Patel, counsei Heard on.admissic:n. Feeilng aggrieved by th< along wlth photo copy of th€ Caurt ofAdditJonal Djstrict Juc Clvil Suit No.ll-A/2003, the Ir by'the appiicarsts. ..Sn vjew' of ths fact tha ••passed in. the year 2004 and 1 by the arbitFator, the o| Agrawal, Senior Adv^ under Section 8 wlt| ReconciIIatlon Act, 1-996, 111 pending by the-Civii Coyrt'as thereafter. "'": Shri.H.B. Agrawa'J, lear| hls' submissjon ?hat after dec^ cM^(<n4ll 'RTR^Tf ^f fs^l <Fai^l< ^aTRm^TT^T tior Advocate with Smt. nts. !or respondent No.1. ^ memo 07-10-2004 issued order 09-03-2004 by the Ige, Balkunthpur, District Korea in revlsjon has preferrsd t the Impugned order has now the may have i!y submisslon made by Shrl H.B. icate Is that of the 1 Seotlon 11 of the Arbitration And' e proceedings cannot be the Court becomes fwctus-officlo led Senior Advocate Is correct jn, -ding the proceedlngs •fina.'Iy, fhe •.'.^ . XI-HC—78 ?T[^T'SFT R-lJoh ^CT ^TT^T'gRT^' Kvr "3"^r '^Tpn^R, ^til^^<o/f®i<ni<4^< ^-.........e..:..€...../y..o....../..l?4 ^ltldl 5b*<l<*»""—"••—'••• "-"—•^•^ 200 31T^?T '(WF ( ^f^^) '^C^TW ^ft?T 31T^?T same shoufd not be kept pend proceedings nothing Is requj proceedings. The award p^ chaSfenged by the party a| proceeding. Therefore, thi"s| directlon to the Triai Court proceedings. cM^f<n<fli 'HFT^ff ^ f®^<F'i^i< ^T 3tRFT 3TT^T jng by the Court because in such red to be decided In the said issed by the arbitrator can be ggn'eved by fifing a separate revjsion is disposed of with a not to keep pending the said 'l— Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge