-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Income Tax Appeal No.1588 of 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax I, Pune ..Appellant vs. Kirloskar Copeland Limited ..Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant. None for respondent. CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 12th August, 2008 12th August, 2008 12th August, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Gupta, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant. None appears for respondent. 2. In the above appeal we have perused the Tribunal’s order dated 31st May, 2007,. The order clearly indicates that the matter has been remanded back for fresh adjudication in the light of the directions already given in A.Y. 1995-96, 1996-97, 1997-98, 1998-99 and 1999-2000. In view thereof we do not find any substantial question of law in the above appeal. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal. (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)