71: « :N THE HIGH COmT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUB Writ Petition No.. fl of 2001. IN THE IviATTEB GF ; PETITLQiffi Awdhesh Kumar Singh, qged 30 years, S/o Shri Chirinirl Dist-fc. Kore< Chhattisqarh. ;'!' ^l V ER S U,S RESPONDB1TS il' ?<ls*»**-<- ?i.0< -•- ^-•••<^wn' .^^- ^ • .,\~y -3 % •oS^ 'ii<i,^ s 1 / State j0f Chhat-tisgarh, through Secretary Urban Administration and Local Self Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2^ The Collector, Korea Distt. Korea. , Chhatti sgarhj.|| lifll 3^ Chief Municipal Officer, ^-^" Nagar Palika, Chirmiri, Distt. Korea. ChhattisgarH.j ty ^ „ „, . :. ::„ . : ||: P 4'. S.B.Sharma, Asst. Engineer,) Nagar Palika Chirmiri, ..]| Distt. Korea, Chhattisgarh.1|||| 5< Manoj Singh, C.M.O. Nagar Palika, Chirmj.igii.j Distt. Korea, Chhattigarh, ||]" WBIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTI- TUTIOM OF XNDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPBIATE WIT NATUBE OF CERTIORARI/MANDWUS ETC. OK 1 ;'RDEaS/D'ffiECTIONS IN THE LIKE NATUBE ETC. Ail [tl 1B3 siii" q Xi-HC-22 »r i, •^fta'TS,'fsicirey •.t' ..k3...-.ft.^..ol.../. 3)lt?!^I S 'R^ 311^1 ?!7qi»7nt?n SII^I ?^!T8jT ;tfe li.oT.aoos Shri R.N. Pandey, counsel fo^ tfae petitioner. Shri Sunfl Siiiha, Addl. •^iFfe'ih -cniRif ^ •fei3t <F»]<^K •^siPTtia^T Adv. Oeneral for fhe State/ respondent no. 1 to 3. SIiri Ashish Shrivastava, coujascl for the respondent no.4. i Shri Abhishek Smha, couns^ for the respondent Heard. cduse rts This petition was B\ed is. Litigatiou praying for a directton provide proper civic amcruties to B-regularitics and to restrajn thc Officer, NsiQStr Palika, Chirmiri giving contracts wifhout caUiag When fhe matter is taken. ^ coiiasel fhat Nagar PaEka, Chirimi^i the iiature of F'ubUc Intuest ^omiaaDdmg the respondents to aa enquuy into the flnaacial ^spondcnt no.3- Chicf Municipal Kagsa~ Palika, Ghirmiri froin place Municipal Corporation iiaa l^cen constituted. In fhis view of the naatter, leamed counsel for tht put forward his gricvaaces before should be duiected to look into fhe aibd ten^ers ^pi, it is stated by leamed State i has been dissolved aad in its ^ petitioner states fhat hc shaU Municipal Corporatiion, which ^ame. Accordingty, it K directed the [•t&^pgq w XI-HC-22 ^"q"=qFTRP(, •s^Hns; %yi:y3< TOWffi WSIfi "(Ft, 'sn^f^ii '"• f?;ri?i'sii§w grwq?,'Bl%g an^r^aRR^ii^ that in case the petitioner put Municipal CoTporation, fhe said inatter and take appropriate warrauted, fhe petitioner inay bej 1 grievauces are not redressed he Court in accoidaace wifh law. $>rwaid his gricvaaces before the Corporation shall took into fhe sl|eps in this legard and, if so hcard. In case tfae petttioner's (would be fi?ee to approach fhte With the above observatjo|ns and directions, the petition staads disposed of. Thc secunfy deposited be refunded to fhe petitioner. Certified copy as pcr Rutes. - .-- c'.-——J --.———- Sd/- P.C. Naik Judge R-o ^'nc'"M ^N?pN'cfOT?if ^'Es^ ^T St^OT SlRSf Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge