IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37139 of 2009 1. SANTOSH YADAV S/O RAMJEE YADAV VILL.- KABILASHPUR, P.S.- DURGAWATI, DISTT.- KAIMUR (BHABHUA) Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. JHUNNI DEVI D/O MURAHU YADAV VILL.- JAYPUR, P.S.- MOHANIA, DISTT.- KAIMUR (BHABUA) ----------- 2 14.12.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner, complainant and the counsel appearing for the State. Petitioner is the husband of the complainant. Offences alleged is under Sections 406, 498A of the Indian Penal C ode and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioner has instituted a matrimonial case No. 37 of 2008 under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for restitution of Conjugal rights which is pending before the Principal Judge,Family Court, Kaimur at Bhabua. Petitioner is ready to keep his wife and the complainant is ready to live. Petitioner as well as Complainant will appear before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Kaimur at Bhabua, in case the complainant is agreeable to go with petitioner, the Principal Judge concerned will pass such orders. In the facts and circumstances, Prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of Santosh Yadav is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, petitioner aforesaid will be enlarged 2 on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bhabua in Complaint case No. 1174 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar