IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 30TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 OP (RC).No. 929 of 2010(O) -------------------------- RCP.21/2006 of PRL.M.C., KOLLAM .................... PETITIONER/JUDGMENT DEBTOR/PLAINTIFF : -------------------- SARASWATHY, POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER REPRESENTED BY D/O.ANU V.S, V.S BHAVAN, PARAKKOTTU PADINJARETHIL, MUNDAKKAL EAST KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.THYPARAMBIL THOMAS THOMAS RESPONDENT(S)/DECREE HOLDER/DEFENDANT: --------------- 1. MADHUSOODHANAN,S/O.SAHADEVAN, AJITHA BHAVAN, THURAYIL KIZHAKKETHIL, MUNDAKKAL ,KOLLAM. 2. LAILA MADHUSOODHANAN, W/O.MADHUSOODHANAN, AJITHA BHAVAN THURAYIL KIZHAKKETHIL,MUNDAKKAL ,KOLLAM. THIS OP (RENT CONTROL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. ------------------------ O.P.(RC).No. 929 OF 2010 ------------------------ Dated this the 30th day of November, 2010 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. None of the grounds raised in this revision, appeal to the jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution. The above jurisdiction is visitorial in nature and will be invoked only very sparingly. However, considering the submission of Sri.Thyparambil Thomas, the learned counsel for the petitioner, that the execution court ordered delivery even as a regular appeal is pending before the appellate authority, we dispose of the original petition without granting the prayers sought for however, directing the Execution Court to keep in abeyance the order of delivery passed till 9/12/2010. It is open to the petitioner to seek appropriate relief from the appropriate court in the meanwhile. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE dpk