THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.6799 of 2009 Dated 14th July, 2011 Between: Maloth Laxmi …Petitioner And The Agent to the Government and District Collector, Khammam and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Palivela Satya Raja Babu Counsel for respondents: GP for Social Welfare The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the interference of the respondents with the property bearing No.7-85/1, admeasuring Ac.0.08 cents, of Laxmidevipally Village, Somulagudem Gram Panchayat, Paloncha Mandal, Khammam District as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted and the same is not disputed by the learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare representing the respondents that this Court has disposed of W.P.No.9989 of 2009 filed raising an identical issue. The learned counsel for the petitioner placed before the Court a copy of order, dated 18.04.2011, passed in the said writ petition, wherein this Court inter alia held as under: “In my opinion, if the petitioner has fabricated the house site patta, she is not entitled to invoke the discretionary jurisdiction of this Court. However, before holding that the petitioner indulged in fabrication, she is entitled to be given an opportunity of being heard by way of a notice. Accordingly, respondent No.3 is directed to issue notice to the petitioner giving her an opportunity of filing her explanation. If the petitioner files her explanation within the prescribed time, respondent No.3 shall pass an appropriate order and communicate the same to her. In the event of rejection of the petitioner’s explanation or for non-filing of such explanation within the prescribed time, respondent No.3 shall be free to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, in pursuing the criminal case pending against the petitioner. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.” Since the present writ petition is identical to W.P.No.9989 of 2009, the same is disposed of in terms of the order re-produced above with the direction that the order passed in W.P.No.9989 of 2009 shall form part of this order. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, interim order, dated 01.04.2009, shall stand vacated and W.P.M.P.No.8892 of 2009 and W.V.M.P.No.3163 of 2009 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 14th July, 2011 VGB