.1@ d ^l^r& IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl N0. -)-°9 /2007 ^L) <^. STITIONER ^/....•••"^ .c^€ ^(^ ••-®> ^c <<" ,^>''' y»~ EiSPONDENTS acSurya Narayan Tiwari S/o Late Ram Awadh Tiwari aged about 40 years, Uooer Division Teacher. Government Higher Secondary School, Camp-1, Bhilai, District, Durg (C.G.) VERSUS *] State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ,,.2)- Director, Public Instructions, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) 3) District Education officer, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 g^^TpiRpr, riTflyis, Rfiiitiy OS.p.CS^ M°. a-°3/°7 c$ Dt^dT sh*<l<h TPT 200 W^t 4dW (lic<t3s"i8T) sn^r^TR-ii*' (raTsn^Taiiiw SRtTWBfScrsn^T wrfypfrTim?fffffe^ rfSfFZR ^iSTf^iTan^r 18.01.2007 <^, Babhi '<. <Ar. Anupam Dubey and Mr. R|S. Patel, counsel for the petitioner(3). Mr. Arvind Oubey, Ponel LtMc|rer for the State/respondents. With the consent of learn^d counsel appeoring for ttie pwties, the writ petition is heard fi^ialty and disposed of. Common order dictated in Wr|it Petition (5) No. 209/2007 in open Cburt-, passed separately. A copy of thfe order be (^laced on the record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge v' fc 'l/ •^ P.T.O. HKH CWKT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SIhteLE BEtsKH : HON-BLE WSt. SATtSH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. Petitioner WRFT PETmON tS.) No.209 OF 2007 Surya Naroyan Tiwnri versus Respondents State of ChhattiS9arh ond others WRTT PETmON (S.) No.211 OF 2<%)7 Petitioner : Shameshwur Singh Thakur versus ResBondents State of Othattisgarh and others Petitioner WRIT rcTCTION (5.) No. 212 OF 2007 Ravindra l&imar Patkar yersus ResDpnctents State of Chhatt'is9arh and others WRIT PETmON t5.) No. 213 OF 2007 Petitsoner ; Smt. Nidhi Owivedi versus Reqiondents State of Chhatt'isgarh <md others WRTT PETTHON fS.l ^4o.248 CT 2007 Petitionars : Qwndrodiekhar Patel and others versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. Anupam Dubey, counsel and AAr. R.S. Patel, counsel for the petitioner(s). Mr. Arvind Dubey, Pons\ Lawyer for the State/respondents. Oft&ER yossed on tiiis 18th Doy of Januaa-y, 2007) Learned counsel appeau'ing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly aibmit that the focts and question of low involved in •the present writ petitions are squarely covered by -the decision of this Court in -the case of Yashmint KIMIW Shwvidwaj ws. Mwueifwl Corpavtlon, t>wy and eawthei^. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, the^ writ petitions are disposed of in +erms of -the decision of this Court in the matter of yastiwvit ^umar BharadwaJ (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether -the petitioners have acquired B.EdVB.TJ. Certtfi<ates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further wAiether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on the record of the connected -.wit petitions. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge 1 2006CII)MPJR-C©96 Bobh)