Lsp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 548 of 2009 Shri Janardhan Govind Ganagare ...Petitioner V/s. Smt. Kamalabai Kamlakar Gaikwad & ors. ...Respondents Mr. M.A.Cbhaudhari i/by Dr.Prakash Deshmukh for the petitioner. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. DATED DATED DATED : 28TH JANUARY, 2009 : 28TH JANUARY, 2009 : 28TH JANUARY, 2009 P.C. . Having regard to the concurrent finding of fact which in my opinion is appropriate, no interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction is warranted. Dismissed. 2. At this stage Counsel for the petitioner submits that atleast some reasonable time to vacate the premises may be granted. Since the respondent is not appearing, I am inclined to show indulgence to the petitioner with liberty to the respondent to apply for recall of this part of the order, if so advised. 3. The petitioner is granted time to vacate till 30th June, 2009 on filing usual undertaking in this Court within two weeks and also deposit all the outstanding dues within same time, if any. 2 4. It is once again made clear that in case the indulgence shown to the petitioner granting time to vacate is not acceptable to the respondent landlord, he may file application for recall of this part of the order which will be considered on its own merits. [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.] [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.] [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.]