IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18918 of 2010 M/S MAGADH MANISHA CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, RABINDRA PRASAD SINGH S/O LATE BHOLA SINGH, RESIDENT OF L.I.G. 299, HANUMAN NAGAR, P.S. PATRAKAR NAGAR, TOWN AND DISTRICT PATNA--------------------------------PETITIONER Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, VISHESHWARAIYA BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 3.THE CHIEF ENGINEER, NORTH ENGINEER, NORTH ROAD WING (TRAFFIC), DARBHANGA, CAMP PATNA, BIHAR 4.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIHAR RAJYA POOL NIRMAN NIGAM LTD., MANGLES ROAD, PATNA 5.THE SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER, ROAD DIVISION, BIHAR RAJYA POOL NIRMAN NIGAM LTD., DAROGA RAI PATHA, PATNA-15----RESPONDENTS ----------- For the petitioner :Mr.Subodh Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State :Mr.P.K.Sharan, A.C. to AAG XI ----- 2. 19.11.2010 Learned counsel for the State submits that the writ petition is not maintainable as the subject matter of the dispute squarely falls within the jurisdiction of Bihar State Public Works Contract Arbitration Tribunal. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ application with liberty to approach the Tribunal. The writ application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Considering the relief being sought by the petitioner, who claims to have completed 80% of the work, let the 2 matter be considered and disposed of by the Tribunal expeditiously, in case the petitioner approaches it. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) Spal/