C^,;'o-^__ INTHEHIGHCOyR'I'OFJODIGATUREOFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W P fS ) NO^Q^ /2010 PETITIONER a, ^liii^ b^.^^.^ fe-:^;^" RESPQNDENTS ishok Kum.ar CKandraS/oLate Shri Nawagautiya Ghahdra, Aged about 38 years; Occupatkin Upper Divisipn Teacher, Govf. Middle ,School, Sakarali, Block Dabhara, Distl; : Janjgir-Champa :{c.G^' ' 'r . ::..^^^^^^^^^^ • State of Chha&tisgarh Through : The Secretary.SchoDl Educatonal Dejpartment j D.K.S. Bhawah, ;Rai^E;T)isfrict;-Rarpur^(Gi(j;) :Disfnefc;EdH:eation QfGcer', • . ;::<3'a^gir,J®tsiriGt;';Ja.n}gir-Cit£Ern@a •;11WS;i:'::;':':ll^i'::^]:\::::^^ :01@el!;i@HucatiQnl|Qfficer',,,' 1^'; ! . ^BlQieie:i®aIaliaFa,,VDistrict ..Janjgir '.CIiamp^<©;:G.)::,v^:1, ;l'v^ •.••.!''-.^ WR!1;;^PETH3Q ^BNE®n^^ARTieLE 1 226 .• QF ^! THE €QNS^TUTi©N/QB^I^lF©R'lSSIJMGE.(3EWMa?;!IN NATURE Or MAND^MUS y. CEK'I'KaRAK^ 1 OR^ ANY GTHER Wm^O^I.JKE.^Aa^I^.E^C.;. -' . . r ": ;Y The petitioner, nained above 'rilos^ humbly |'and ^4-^^11^ II-HC.22 311^1 ^iT I^^NsiiiBT *ii=»>vf^s •Svi -^w\v\^, ^Wl't.hww'y. 3'n^T xraraf? W*«?(TShliqi 3'n^r xraraf? _.....U:£,^...^,36Q2/C" 'WT, 200' fq^T' 3II^l( T^ttW ^lft? SB : HON'BLB MR. JUSTICB PRITBlKBR DIWAKBR 03.12.201Q Shri D.R.Patel, counselfor Shri Pravcen Das, Dy. G.A. The petitioaier, who was (he petitioaer. jfor tiie State. appointed on the post of Assistant Teacher under the Sch^ol Education Department on 13,05.97 (Annexure P/2) is ag^neved by (he action of the respondents ia not addiag two ad^aace uicreinents in his salaiy even fhough he did his D.Ed. ft^sa. C.G. Madliyaiaik Shiksha Mandal, Raipiu- at tus own cost seekiag penaission fbr the same ffom the dcpaatment. Counsel for the petitioner ^ubnuts ffaat fhe pctitioner is entifled for two advance iacrenielats as he had obtained D.Ed Exalnination certificate, ia acco^daace with the provisions of Circillar dated 24.12.98 and in vi^w ofthejudgments ofHon'ble Suprexae Court ia the taatter of| Badrmarayan Achaiya aad othe^s reported ia 1996 SC 2779 and Yashwaat Kumar Bbardwai Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and anofher reported in 20q6 (II) MPJR 96 (CG), On fhe ofher hand, couasjel for fhe State submits. fhat. erstwhile State of Madliya F|radesh vide circular dated 22.10.1964 aUowed advance govenuaent servants who prc) 22.10.1964 whefher at his own dpst or at the govemiaent cost. However, who proceeded on tram(ng on or after 23.10. 1964 can get two aanual increments oidy if not at ftie cost of the Goveruinent. This cucular of dated ^)^rfcf<!ftrl {fl^ff "^ f^1^ ^RtfR ^3?P(PT3^T iu the year June 2003 after State of M.P. & Another Vs. m.creinents osty to fhose 'eeded for tramiag up to fhe traiaing is at his cost aad - 23.10.1964 was superceded vide order dated l0.l2.1975,,^I«ig-, ./y^ "% '1; W.:'"S!S3\ S-HC-22 ••^^^sl § ^, '^i.tf'''.^ ~^^_ ':^""" ^^ -s^-^fptRra, ^Tflwiii. (»iinitiy 3Tr^?r 'iRra? >d-^..^-1s^ "WI. 200 *<IWfT9iHr«(i 'fa^ST' SII^I'^1 R-li'* S^V sh+li^ ^?ft3 -^" 311^1 TOIIW ^rf^I Goveraiaent vide notification datdd 16.6.1973 aiaended M.P. Non-Gazette Class-II Educational S^avices (Non-coflege Serviccs) Recruitment aad Promotion Rules B.T.I. or B.Ed degree for appoiatni|ent on the post ofAssistant Teacher. The petitioner woidd iacrements onlv ia the conditioiil B.T.I/B.Ed./B.T.I. degree at his o(vn cost during semce after obteiiung pemussion fonn fhe dcp| to 1.3.99. To clarify the above po^ been issued on 6.2.2007 and on 3Q Facts, as detailed above, are fertment between 23.10.1964 jition, circulare have already U.09. |not in dispute. This Court ia the inatter of Yashwaat ^uiaar BJiaradwaj (supra) elaborately discussing the circulars dated '2^.12.98, 1.3.99 and relying upon fhe judginent of fhe Hon'bte Badrinarayan Acharya's case (su^ra) has he]d fhat teachers, not assistant teachers alone, woul|l be entitled to two advanee increraents on obtairung B.Ed ^xaiaiuation certificate after 22.10.1964, as tiie circuJar d^ted 22.10.1964 does not prescribe aay outer limit of the pe & B.T.I. certificate. It has been fudther held fhat circular datcd 1.3.99 is appUcablc to only Assista|nt Teachers (LDT) aad not to ofher teachers (UDT). Shri. Das fairty subinits fhat Yashwant Kum.ar Bliaradwaj'scas^ and case of the petitioner in fhjis petition is atso squaaely covered by fhe above judgxueijit as also circular dated <=hi^i<n<f1'rt TfFl^f'? ft^ <Fi|<^t< ^TaiPwan^r 1993 added qualification of be entitled for advaace fhat he had obtamed his Apex Court in the matter of riod ofobtamiug B.Ed, M.Ed princyle of law laid down in fsupra} bas attauied finality 24.12.19987 ~^VWI XI-HC-22 -srsi ••qraRR, ^iTI-y'iii. faniyy 3TT^?T 1(3^7 ..i^&L^sy^/^ *<r(«?figi*n^ fN^sr' an^r^r R;-ii<t> sf^s aRW^f?B si^BITRHWdiCT Por fhe aforesaid reasons, th^ paynient oftwo advance incieinentsj of the petitioner's D.Ed. examiaatj are accordiagly directed to raak^ increments to fhe petitioner 6xim. examination, wifhia a period of| Howcver, fhis order shaU be subjecl the State regarding facts pleaded in| No order as to eosts. fte petitioaer is cntitled to fhe fix>m the date ofdeclaratioii (on result. The respondeats payment of two advaace date ofhis passing D.Ed. foiir inonffas fi»in today, i: to aU verifications inade by |the petition. chfflit'fift'l 'Vff^t ^ 'f^Zt ^,f^R^I< ^F'siPg'Tai^r Sdi- Pritinker Diwakar Judge J'-ff^ 'SfT^'i