IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.893 of 2008 Date of Decision: December 03, 2010 Om Nath Gupta .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab and others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing Orders Annexure P-1 and P-2, both dated 29.9.2006 vide which pay of the petitioner has been reduced and on refixation of pay, it has been ordered that recovery be effected from the petitioner for the monetary benefits received by the petitioner in excess. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner CWP No.893 of 2008 [2] and respondents are ad-idem that considering the nature of dispute, let the issue be referred to the Committee constituted in deference to Order dated 2.3.2010 passed in Civil Writ Petition No.16323 of 2008 titled ‘Smt. Sudarshana Devi vs & another vs. State of Punjab & others’. 3. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of in terms of Order dated 2.3.2010 passed in Civil Writ Petition No.16323 of 2008 titled ‘Smt. Sudarshana Devi vs. & another vs. State of Punjab & others’. (AJAI LAMBA) December 03, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?