THE HON'BLE SMT.JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P. No. 61 of 2010 Order: The present Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 31.12.2009 of the learned Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in E.P. No.116 of 2008 in P.L.S.A. No.936 of 2008 ,whereby and whereunder the learned Chief Judge allowed the E.P. and issued warrant of arrest against the judgment debtors on deposit of subsistence allowance by the decree holder. The petitioners are the judgment debtors and the respondent is the decree holder. The Permanent Lok Adalat has passed an award on 6.2.2008 against the petitioners-judgment debtors herein, for a sum of Rs. 1,20,000/- as against the amount of Rs.1,47,870/- payable in two instalments, failing which, it directed the petitioners to pay the entire amount of Rs.1,47,870/- plus future contractual rate of interest and costs jointly and severally in lump sum. When the petitioners failed to comply with the award, the respondent filed the aforementioned E.P. before the learned Chief Judge for issuance of arrest warrant against the petitioners for recovery of the E.P. amount. While opposing the E.P., the petitioner No. 1 filed a counter before the trial Court stating that due to the ill health of his family members, he had spent huge amounts and therefore he could not pay the amount of Rs.1,20,000/- in two instalments. He further pleaded that he has to pay the amount from out of his salary and as he is facing acute financial problems, he may be permitted to pay the E.P. amount in monthly instalments at Rs. 3,000/- per month. The learned Chief Judge having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the counter affidavit, allowed the said E.P. through the impugned order. Hence, the present revision. On 28.1.2010, this Court granted interim stay on condition of the petitioners depositing an amount of rs.50,000/- within four weeks. However, when the petitioners failed to comply with the interim order granted by this court, this Court vacated the said interim order through order dated 25.3.2010. Admittedly, when the Permanent Lok Adalat has passed the Award with the consent of the learned counsel for both the parties and the petitioners having agreed before the Lok Adalat for payment of the award amount in two instalments are not justified in not complying with the said Award. Therefore, the trial Court has rightly allowed the E.P. In the circumstances, I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the order under revision warranting interference. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that if some time is granted to the petitioners, they would pay the decretal amount. Under the circumstances, the petitioners are granted three months time from today to pay the decretal amount, failing which, the impugned order dated 31.12.2009 of the learned Chief Judge, trial shall become operative. ___________________ T.MEENA KUMARI,J Date: 8.9.2010 pnb