WP(C) 6170/2005 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.P.KATAKEY Heard Mr A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner insurance company by the present petition filed under Art icle 226 of the Constitution of India has challenged the award dated 28.2.2005 p assed by the learned Member, MACT, Barpeta in MAC Case No.499 of 2004 awarding a sum of Rs.11,02,640/-(Rupees eleven lakhs two thousand six hundred and fourty o nly) as compensation for the death of the claimant’s husband in a motor accident that occurred on 21.3.2004 at around 6.30pm involving the motor vehicle bearing registration No.AS-21/3913(Truck) that belonged to the respondent no.3. An appeal is provided under the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 19 88. The petitioner admittedly has not obtained the permission to contest the pro ceedings from the learned tribunal on the grounds available to the owner of the offending vehicle, apart from the grounds available to it u/s 149(2) of the Act. The scope of interference of the award passed by the learned tribunal under the provisions of the Act in exercise of the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is very limited. This Court in exercise of such jurisdicti on cannot re-appreciate the evidences on record and give a different finding as recorded by the learned tribunal. This Court can interfere such an award when th e same amounts to miscarriage of justice. The perusal of the impugned award dated 28.2.2005 does not show any grou nd to entertain and admit the writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismiss ed. Interim order, if any, passed earlier stands vacated. No costs.