IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.283 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 11.01.2010. Malkhan Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Malkhan Singh-petitioner in person. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) In this civil writ petition, the petitioner seeks a mandamus directing the respondents to regularize his services in terms of the orders passed by this Court from time to time. The records reveal that previously also the petitioner had filed Civil Writ Petition No.15090 of 2007 seeking the same relief but the said writ petition was dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court vide a self speaking order dated 19.8.2008 (Annexure P-8). The Review Application No.310 of 2009 filed by the petitioner against the said order was also dismissed vide order dated 23.1.2009 (Annexure P-10). The petitioner again approached this Court by way of Civil Writ Petition No.4713 of C.W.P.No .283 of 2010 (O&M) 2 2009 seeking a direction for regularization of his services. The second writ petition was also dismissed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 14.9.2009 after taking notice of the fact that the earlier writ petition filed by the petitioner, i.e., CWP No.15090 of 2007, had already been dismissed. In the above-stated second writ petition also, the petitioner applied for review but his Review Application No.20084 of 2009 has been dismissed vide order dated 15.12.2009 (Annexure P-11). The petitioner has yet filed this third writ petition seeking the same relief. In my considered view, the writ petition seeking identical relief is nothing but an abuse of process of law and the same is not maintainable. Dismissed. 11-01-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE