THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.20813 of 2006 Between: M/s.Jithram Finance, HT Connection No.HDN 950, Represented by Landlord V.V.S.R.Anjaneyulu … Petitioner AND The Divisional Engineer, Operations, A.P.C.P.D.C.L., Greenlands, Ameerpet, Hyderabad And others … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.20813 of 2006 ORDER: The first respondent herein issued notice dated 19.6.2006 to M/s.Zainab Commercial Complex informing that there are consumption dues of Rs.55,334/- against Service Connection No.A201152 and that if the amount is not paid within seven (7) days, necessary action would be taken as per the Revenue Recovery Act by attaching movable and immovable properties. The said notice was served on the petitioner, who is allegedly an occupant of a portion of the commercial complex with different HT connection. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed the instant writ petition. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned notice lacks any details regarding the premises number where S.C.No.A201152 is installed or details of arrears. He also submits that the petitioner herein is not in arrears and it has paid the entire amount till now and that the petitioner apprehends that its movable properties might be attached in violation of principles of natural justice. Even according to the petitioner, the impugned notice was issued to M/s.Zainab Commercial Complex. Therefore, the petitioner cannot have any grievance. Even if it is served at the premises of the petitioner, he has failed to property plead as to how he is aggrieved by such notice, when it is not concerned and the petitioner has separate service connection. This writ petition, therefore, cannot be entertained, as it is filed by a person, who is not directly aggrieved by the action of the respondents. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. _____________ October 18, 2006 (V.V.S.RAO,J) YS