-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2957 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2845 OF 1993 Bhalchandra V. Thanekar since deceased through heirs and LRs. and Others. . ..Applicants.. Versus Yeshwant M. Koli and others. ..Respondents. Mr. A. R. Gole for the applicants. Mr. S. N. Bhosale, AGP for R-3 to 5. Ms. Anulata Sondurkar h/f Gouri Godse for R-1. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : March 30, 2011. P. C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. This civil application is taken out for bringing the legal heirs of petitioner no. 1 on record. There is a delay of 9 years. Petitioner no.1 died on 10/10/2000 and the present civil application is filed on 15/3/2010. In paragraph no.2 of the civil application, it is mentioned that the applicants were not aware about the formalities to be complied with to bring legal heirs of petitioner no.1 on record. They came to know that the legal heirs are required to be brought on record when they received letter from their advocate and immediately they have filed this civil application. I find that delay is srp -: 2 :- unintentional and not deliberate. The applicants are illiterate persons. In that view of the matter latitude deserves to be shown to them. Civil application is therefore allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Necessary amendment be carried out within the period of two weeks from today. Civil application stands disposed of. (RANJIT MORE, J.) -: 3 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2958 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2845 OF 1993 Bhalchandra V. Thanekar since deceased through heirs and LRs. and Others. . ..Applicants.. Versus Yeshwant M. Koli and others. ..Respondents. Mr. A. R. Gole for the applicants. Mr. S. N. Bhosale, AGP for R-3 to 5. Ms. Anulata Sondurkar h/f Gouri Godse for R-1. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : March 30, 2011. P. C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. This civil application is taken out for bringing the legal heirs of petitioner no. 3 on record. There is a delay of 9 years. Petitioner no.3 died on 24/08/2000 and the present civil application is filed on 15/3/2010. In paragraph no.2 of the civil application, it is mentioned that the applicants were not aware about the formalities to be complied with to bring legal heirs of petitioner no.3 on record. They came to know that the legal heirs are required to be brought on record when they received letter from their advocate and immediately they have filed this civil application. I find that delay is srp -: 4 :- unintentional and not deliberate. The applicants are illiterate persons. In that view of the matter latitude deserves to be shown to them. Civil application is therefore allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Necessary amendment be carried out within the period of two weeks from today. Civil application stands disposed of. (RANJIT MORE, J.)