IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12590 of 2009 1. Geeta Devi wife of late Suresh Yadav 2. Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Kumar @ Gourav Kumar 3. Sonu Yadav @ Subash Yadav, both are sons of late Suresh Yadav, resident of village Ghogha Dikcha, P.S. Jarmundi, Distt. Dumka Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 25.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Section 381 of the Indian Penal Code and are named in the First Information Report and alleged to have committed theft of cash amounting to Rs. 23,000/- and jewellery worth Rs. Two lacs and odd. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioner no.1 served the informant as maid servant, petitioner no.2 is her minor son and petitioner no.3 is serving as Electrician at New Delhi and from the income generated, lands were purchased from the informant. Copies of the sale deeds are contained in Annexure-2 series to this application. Let the petitioners above named surrender in the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order in the court below and the original of the sale deeds, Annexure-2 series be produced before the court below and if the court below is satisfied that petitioner no.2 is a child within the meaning of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) 2 Act then petitioner nos. 1 and 2, Geeta Devi and Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Kumar @ Gourav Kumar be admitted to the privilege of bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rs. Five thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Habibpur P.S. Case No. 106 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and the prayer of petitioner no.3, Sonu Yadav @ Subash Yadav for grant of regular bail be considered in accordance with law. In the event petitioner no.2 is not adjudged as child on the date of occurrence, then appropriate orders be passed in accordance with law. Until such determination, no coercive steps, however, be taken against the petitioner nos. 1 and 2. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)