IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6108 of 2010 POLA RAM, S/o Late Sukdeo Ram. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.7557 of 2010 BINOD MAHTO, S/o Mahendra Mahto. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 30.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners were refused bail earlier on account of fact that they were identified by the informant in the Test Identification Parade as also the fact that seven out of ten witnesses have been examined during trial. Now, the petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail and it is brought to the notice of the Court that even the Investigating Officer has been examined during trial. In view of such I see no justification to review the earlier order. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it positively within the next four months from today. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)