Crl. Misc. No.M-31438 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-31438 of 2010 Date of Decision: October 26, 2010 Jagdish Singh …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Jagdish Singh, petitioner in-person. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner claims that his property is being grabbed and is being trespassed by the private respondents. Through instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. he seeks a direction to SSP, Jalandhar to take legal action against the private respondents. I have gone through the earlier representation annexure P-1 submitted to SSP, Jalandhar. The allegations in the said representation dated August 23, 2010 appear to be vague and uncertain. Prima facie, Crl. Misc. No.M-31438 of 2010 [2] commission of any cognizable offence is not reflected from the vague allegations in annexure P-1 as such I express my inability to issue any direction to SSP, Jalandhar. At this stage, the petitioner appearing in person submits that his property has been trespassed and he has been dispossessed from some area and that the private respondents are bent upon to trespass into his other property. In this context the petitioner may submit a complaint to SHO of the area concerned as per provisions of Section 154 (1) Cr.P.C. in case any cognizable offence is committed by any person. In case no action is taken, it will be open to the petitioner to approach SSP as per the provisions of Section 154 (3) Cr.P.C. Disposed of with the above observations without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to approach this Court again. October 26, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE