^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fC.G.) M.A^o ^^ / 2006 APPELLANT Claimant RESPONDENTS ^' ^// ?% zy^r ../ i"' 7 j'^ / 'y./s/ ' e' ^ ^ Madhusudan Goswami Aged about 38 years S/o. Shri Bharat Goswami, resident of Near Dalla Sher, Jarhabhata, Bilaspur Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS 1. Shivji Prasad, Aged about 42 years, S/o. Rajdhari Prasad, S/o. Anand Transport Tifra, P.S. Civil Line Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Rewatiraman Gadhwal, S/o. Ramvijay Pratap Singh Ghadwal, resident of Aanand Transport & Travelers Tifra, P.S. Civil Line,Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. The New India Insurance Company Limited, Opposite Rajeev Plaja, Bus Stand Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur(C.G.) ^\ '^! Claim before the Tribunal Rs.05,80,000/- Awarded amount Rs. 84,600/- . Same in the present appeal. MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL U/S 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT. 1988 XI-HC-78 Hm <TT «»*1|ch 3^T '^l<41ct^, t?Tft<rl^l<o, fs|(rll^< —^-^-fe-")Vo.^/^ :!^Ki—l-^^-—-'^29Q w^T^rf^ri^ cT2TTW^T$b^|cb ^ t?T^5icb (<ic<t^^) ?;RTTW ^TfN'W^?T DB: HON'BLE SHRI L.C. BHA & HON'BLE SHRI DmRENDfi 2-1-2007 Shii Gautam Klietrapal, A4v. for the appellant. Heard. This appeal has been prefe}{i'ed against the award dated 5-9-2006 passed in Claim Case No. 27/2006 by First ^j Bilaspur. Giievance ofthe appeUa]|it is fliat the appellant was not able to peiibi-m his duties for four months whereas he 25,000/- for pain and sufiteiing, Rs| hospital, Rs. 405000/-fortreatmen| and fhei'eby a total sum ofRs. 84^ to show that the appellant remaine| montlis' salary lias atready been a^j alsojust and reasonable amount ha| illegality or infirmity m the impug| is liable to be dismissed and it is h\ <=hi^^4)ri w^ff ^ te^t ^^K ^3Tf^TT3TT^T DOO. AS.CJ. AMISHRA.J .dditional Motor Accident Clauns Tribunal, lias been awarded two monfhs7 salaiy. We have pemsed the impu^ned award. Leamed Tribunal has awarded Rs. 10,000/- for special expenses when he was m and medicines and Rs. 9,600/- for loss ofwork OO/- has been awai'ded. There is nothmg on record absent from duty for four montlis and two ^arded by the leamed Tribunal and on other count s been awarded, as such we do not find any led award. The appeal being devoid ofsubstance ^eby dismissed. Sd/- Ag.ChiefJustice Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O.