1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8004 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Coram: Naresh H. Patil and Shrihri P. Davare, JJ. Date : 24.11.2010 1. Heard Shri R.R. Mantri, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, Shri V.D. Rakh, learned A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Shri S.G. Chapalgaonkar, learned Advocate for Resp. No.4. 2. Petitioner had submitted his application to Regional Office, Pune, and the same was rejected. 3. Respondent No. 3 has filed affidavit wherein it is stated that on 13.3.2008, the advertisement No.1/2008 was issued by the Superintending Engineer, P.W.D., Aurangabad, for filling up 113 posts of Civil Engineering Assistants, from the candidates having requisite qualification of C.E.A. examination course. 2 4. The deponent has further contended that as per advertisement No.2/2008, the petitioner had not submitted his application to the deponent's office and therefore, there was no question of refusing petitioner's application. In fact, in stead of submitting application to the deponent's office, the petitioner had submitted his application with the Regional Office, Pune, as the advertisement was issued by the Public Works Department, Pune. Respondent No. 4 communicated to deponent's office by E-mail report that the petitioner's claim was not accepted. 5. In the light of explanation given by Respondents, no interference is called for. Petition stands dismissed. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.) pnd/wp8004.09