IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-32321 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 16, 2011 Asrupi @ Asrubi and others …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Tapan Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State. Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate, for the complainant. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This is a petition seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 112 dated 16.03.2010, under Sections 148 / 149 / 323 / 452 / 307 / 506 / 302 IPC, registered at Police Station Hathin. As per the prosecution story, petitioners, who are alleged to be the members of the unlawful assembly, have CRM M-32321 of 2010 caused injuries on the person of Reshma wife of Yakub. Petitioner No.1 is said to have cut the hairs of Reshma and pushed her down on the road; petitioner no.2 is said to have given danda blow on the right hand of Reshma and petitioner no.3 is said to have inflicted leg blows to Reshma. From the perusal of the record, it reveals that Yakub was expired due to the injuries sustained by him in the said incident and petitioners have caused injuries to five other persons also. Considering the gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Dismissed. February 16, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2