Crl.M.No. M-28101/2010(O&M) #1# IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M.No. M-28101/2010(O&M) Date of decision:12.11.2010. Bhupinder Singh ....................Petitioner v. State of Punjab .....................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present: Mr.Vipin Mahajan,Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala,AAG Punjab. Jaswant Singh.J.(Oral) Petitioner-husband has approached this Court under Section 438 Cr.P.C for grant of pre arrest bail in case FIR No.70 dated 15.6.2010 under Sections 452/326/324/323/34 IPC, P.S Kahnuwan, District Gurdaspur. It is submitted that the petitioner and complainant-Mandhir Kaur were married seven years back and they have two children. On account of matrimonial dispute, wife had gone to her parental house. On 24.3.2010, petitioner along with his family members had gone to settle the matrimonial dispute, where the petitioner is alleged to have flared up. As per allegations, petitioner is alleged to have inflicted datar blow on the left arm of the complainant-wife. At the time of Crl.M.No. M-28101/2010(O&M) #2# grant of interim pre arrest bail on 23.9.2008, primary submission raised by learned counsel for the petitioner was that on account of the welfare of their two children, he was desirous of settling the matrimonial dispute. At the time of hearing today, learned counsel for the petitioner states that till now no settlement has taken place. Learned state counsel, on instructions from SI Darshan Singh, points out that the said injury inflicted by the petitioner was with such a force that the same was found to be “bone cut” and it has been opined to be grievous in nature. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the manner and nature of injury, I find no ground to extend the benefit of pre arrest bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. 12.11.2010 (Jaswant Singh) manoj Judge