((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.666 OF 2005 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.66 OF 2004 AND CONTEMPT PETITION NO.1 OF 2001 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1910 OF 1999 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1918 OF 1999 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2110 OF 1996 M.Ramchandra Raju Appellant versus Mrs.Prabha P. Shenai Respondent Mr.S.M.Dixit with K.B.Swamy i/by S.K.Legal Associates for appellant. Mr.Oristopher D’Souza with A.B.Salunke i/by S. Ashwinikumar & Co. for respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE : 21st September 2005 PC : 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent. By this appeal the appellant is challenging the order dated 8th April 2005 whereby the learned Single Judge has convicted the appellant for a period of fifteen days and also directed the appellant to pay a fine of ((-2-)) Rs.2,000/- in Contempt Petition No.66 of 2004. After hearing both the parties for some times, both the learned counsel appearing for appellant and respondent consent that the impugned order be set aside. They also submit that no reasons need be given and that they are agreeable that the contempt petition can be argued afresh before the learned Single Judge, strictly on it’s own merits and as per law. Mr.Dixit, learned counsel appearing for the appellant states that M/s.S.K.Legal Associates will appear before the learned Single Judge on behalf of the said contemnor. Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the above. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)