1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. C. A. Z. NO. 599 OF 2011 IN L. P. A. ST. NO. 6271 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3282 OF 2006 Parathlal Tukaram Bisen vs. Industrial Court of Maharashtra at Bhandara _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Shri M. R. Rajgure Adv for applicant. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P. D KODE, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 17, 2011. Learned Single Judge has specifically at the threshold noted that only question argued before him was about quantum of punishment. Contention and effort before us is to show that there was no need to conduct departmental enquiry. We do not find any such challenge arising out of impugned judgment. The prayer to condone delay in filing L. P. A. to challenge that judgment is therefore misconceived. C. A. Z. is thus rejected. JUDGE JUDGE svk