^:&-a .•.^^ •^ f9-""^...- ..^^'•-/- • y^"" '.... &aY®A-"" ^^••^cU'^ ^^'^•^ f^(/2^') S^MGIE BFIVi IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION (C) N0. ^IT- OF 2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENT Lalbabu Sahu S/o Late Yogendra, aged about 36 years, R/o Village Patthalgaon, Tahsil Patthalgaon, District Jashpur C.G. VERSUS 1. State of C.G. through the Secretary Revenue Departaient, DKS ^./'Bhawan Raipur C.G. 2. The Tahsildar, Tahsil Patthalgaon, District Jashpur C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA MAY THIS PLEASE TO YOUR LORDSHIP, c HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : Blb^SPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0.7217 OF 2011 PETITIONER Lalbabu Sahu RESPONDENTS Versus StateofC.G. &Another (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Mon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. - Present:- Shri Rakesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adv. General with Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. - ORDER(QEAL) (Passed on this 1st day of December, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the Tahsildar, without affording proper opportunity of hearing and granting reasonable time to the petitioner, has passed the order under Section 148 (s;c 248) of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959. Learned counsel further submits that no effect shall be given to the impugned notice and the authorities may be permitted to initiate fresh proceedings after registering the case and thereafter, proper opportunity of hearing would be afforded to the petitioner before passing the order. 3. In view of the above, according to the learned Gounsel for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. 5. Certified copy today. ^ Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge