1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.4481 of 2009 (Shri Gajanan Maharaj Sansthan and another v. Nand Kishore Laxman Mali and others) And Writ Petition No.4482 of 2009 (Shri Gajanan Maharaj Sansthan and another v. Ku. Deepali Onkar Khandare and others) And Writ Petition No.4485 of 2009 (Shri Gajanan Maharaj Sansthan and another v. Ramdas s/o Sukhdev Ugale and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : DECEMBER 14, 2009. Heard Shri A.R. Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner-Management; Shri V.A. Kothale, learned counsel for respondent No.1; and Shri Khubalkar, learned AGP for respondent Nos.2 and 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner- Management points out that he has filed Civil Application Nos.2706, 2707, 2708 and 2709 of 2009 seeking amendment in the writ petitions to bring Administrator on record as respondent No.4. The learned counsel for respondent No.1 states that the proposed respondent-Administrator has taken over the Management and the School and he has also permitted respondent No.1 in each petition to join the duty. He further states that the grievance of the Management against the Administrator cannot be gone into in these petitions. During hearing, it has transpired that the 2 Management has filed Writ Petition No.4509 of 2009 challenging the appointment and action of the Administrator. This Court has also issued notice in that petition. It is, therefore, obvious that the Administrator has replaced the Management insofar as the present dispute between the employer and the employees is concerned. The dispute inter se between the present petitioner-Management and the said Administrator cannot be gone into in these petitions, which challenge the judgment of the School Tribunal. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for respondent No.1 that the Administrator has replaced the petitioner, the challenge in these petitions is rendered infructuous at this stage. The petitioner-Management is free to take appropriate steps after they succeed in the writ petition filed by them against the Administrator. The writ petitions are presently disposed of as infructuous with CAs. JUDGE pdl.