1 wp2527.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2527 OF 2011 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. R.M. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 28th APRIL, 2011 Heard Advocate Mr. Sharma for petitioners. Objection raised by petitioners to invocation of alleged arbitration clause and appointment of the Arbitrator under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1966 has been rejected by the learned Arbitrator. Learned counsel contends that as there is no appeal available and 1966 Act prescribes no other remedy, this Court should interfere under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The Hon'ble Apex Court has already settled the position in judgment reported at "A.I.R. 2006 S.C. 450"- M/s S.B.P. & Company V/s M/s Patel Engineering Ltd.,. I do not see any case made out for interference at this stage. With liberty to petitioners to challenge that 2 wp2527.11 order after the proceedings are finally concluded, present Writ Petition is disposed of. 2. Needless to mention that this Court has not applied its mind to adjudicate on merits the issues being raised, at this stage. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE gas/wp2527.11