1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. REVIEW PETITION NO.78 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.970 OF 2003 Ali Zaheer Nasiruddin ..Petitioner. Vs. Union of India and others ..Respondents. .... Petitioner present in person Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondents. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. 15 June 2010. P.C. : The Petition has been dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court consisting of Mr. Justice R.M. Lodha (as His Lordship then was) and Mr. Justice A.S. Aguiar on 8 July 2003. No case has been made out for review of the order of the Court. The Division Bench has made a reference to the fact that an order of eviction was passed against the Petitioner under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971. The earlier petition instituted by 2 the Petitioner (Writ Petition 2235 of 2001) was dismissed by the Division Bench. The Supreme Court while rejecting the Special Leave Petition on 11 July 2002 granted liberty to the Petitioner, upon rejection of his representation to move this Court for appropriate relief. While dismissing the fresh petition the Division Bench has observed that the Petitioner has been unable to show any entitlement for the grant of alternate land after he was dispossessed by following proceedings under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971. The submission that the site which has been in the possession of the Petitioner has been allotted to UTI Bank has also not been accepted. In other words, the Petitioner has been held to possess no right or entitlement to the grant of alternate land and has been evicted in accordance with due process of law. In this view of the matter, no ground for review has been made out. The Review Petition is accordingly dismissed. (Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)