IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.38774 of 2009 UMESH KUMAR THAKUR @ GUDDU @ UMESH THAKUR, son of Suresh Thakur, Resident of village- Chhatauna, P.S. Muffasil, District- Samastipur ...Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ...OP ----------- 2/ 07.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under section 304-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that initially even though a case has been made out that the deceased was murdered for the ends of dowry but later on the informant filed a petition before the Superintendent of Police and the District Magistrate for withdrawal of the case upon which report was called for by the Superintendent of Police and it was reported that in fact, the deceased died on account of complications in the second pregnancy and it was not a case of dowry death and that the marriage had taken place more than seven years, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in connection with Samastipur Town (Muffasil) P.S. case no.276 of 2007, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, and (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. - 2 - Once the trial court is in seisin of the case, he is directed to proceed expeditiously in view of the compromise between the parties and the application for withdrawal of the case. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)