CRM-M No. 10822 of 2011 **** Sukhwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab CRM-M No. 11772 of 2011 Harvinder Singh alias Harjinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab. Present: Mr. Vijay Rana, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. S. S. Chandumajra, DAG, Punjab. **** These two petitions for anticipatory bail have been filed in case bearing FIR No. 98 dated 6.6.2010, under Sections 364, 506, 302, 201, 148 and 149 of the IPC, registered at Police Station Phillaur, District Jalandhar. Since they both arise out of the same FIR, they are being disposed of by this common order. In CRM-M No. 10822 of 2011 the following order was passed on 08.04.2011:- “Counsel heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that Superintendent of Police (Detective), Jalandhar (Rural) by his report dated November 11th, 2010 (Annexure P/5) observed that false case was registered against the petitioner. Notice of motion for 10.5.2011.” Learned DAG, on instructions from ASI Gian Ishwar, has argued that even though this report was submitted late but the SSP did not agree with the report and recommended continuation of prosecution. Be that as it may it cannot be lost sight of that one police authority has found the petitioner innocent. In any case the petitioner would CRM-M No. 10822 of 2011 -2- and CRM-M No. 11772 of 2011 face the trial and suffer whatever punishment is awarded. In the circumstances I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. In case they are arrested, they shall be released on bail by the investigating officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petitions stand disposed of. A copy of this order be placed on the file of the connected case. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE May 10, 2011 sunita