WPSB 726 of 2001 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hob’ble M.C. Jain, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel Sri Rakesh Thapaliyal appearing on behalf of respondent. The petitioner is the legal heir of the deceased employee of the respondents and prays for employment under “Dying in Harness Rules”. He had been before central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad exercising jurisdiction for this state as well. His petition has been disposed of with the observation that the respondent shall take care of the applicant’s claim when his turn comes. It appears that the petitioner approached the concerned authority in 1996 and his representation was disposed of with certain factual state of affairs as regards the claim of several petitioners for compassionate appointment. Thereafter, the petitioner does not appear to have approached either the concerned authority or C.A.T. we can not directly entertain the care in view of the law said form in (1997)3 S.C.C. 261 L. Chanddra Kumar Vs. Union of India. The petition is therefore, dismissed. (M.C. Jain, J.) (P.C. Verma, J.) Dt. 24.04.2001