HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.785 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.01.2011 **** Jai Narain Goyal . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner is said to have made a representation to the Chairman of the Improvement Trust, Patiala being aggrieved against the memo/orders dated 10.06.2009, 16.07.2009 & 27.07.2009 (Annexures P20, P22 & P23, respectively) vide which the petitioner has been directed to stop the construction being raised by him in an area falling within the “42.3 Acres Development Scheme”. (2). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any views on the petitioner’s entitlement to raise the construction, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Chairman of the respondent-Trust to consider the representation dated 05.11.2009 (Annexure P24) made by the petitioner and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (3). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. CWP No.785 of 2011.doc - 2 – 17.01.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge 2