c ^ F!:R-NO-:.S1^ 'l'ssentedbyShr;^ daied..., ^'^ BEFORE THE HON^LE fflGH COURT OF CHHAmSOARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l WRTT PETmON (S1NO. Slsri1 /2006 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OP INDIA. PETITIQNERS ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^'^" .ft ^y' ^ SB:^>. ^'^ff\^ f *^-—^^ / . ....^-Xy'l; *•.- •k 'nvsiW V 'M-'t^v'/s-ii EX\ '' ./-fe^ ^-.^•^^^^•^^h"" /y ^A^'it5"^ '''site«.«»,-«-ss3'^ RESPONDENTS A. Bharat Ram. Sahu, aged about 30 years, son of Shri Chamra Ram Sahu, resident of Pxparhatta, Post Patshivni, Police StationChhura, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Askaran Tandan, aged about 32 years, son of Shri Itwari Ram Tandan, r/o vill & Post Chhura, Tah. Gariyabandh, District Raipiu- (Chhattisgarh) Natun Kumar Dhruv, aged about 38 years, son of Shri Ratirain Dhruv, r/o viUage Murmura, Post Lohar^l, Tah. Gariyabandfa, Disft Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. StateofChhattisgarh, ^ Sw'^-sS!i!SesSSS !iia»hS»i£jik!i'^ik^.''-.~~ ^ .'^\-' w;' ^ Ihrough - the Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Social Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Collector, dista-ict Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Chief Executive OfScer, ZUa Paachayat - Raipur (Chhattisgrh) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Chhura, Distt. Raipur (CG) <&J- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) No, 5154 of2006 Petitioners Bharat Rain Sahu& others Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & ofheis Sin^le Bench ; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. AgBihotet. Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Suinesh Bajaj, Govenunent Advocate for tbe respondents No. 1 and2. None for the respondents No. 3 and 4. ORDER (21st September, 2006) 1. The onfy coutention of the petitioners in this petition is to dircct fhe respondents to consider and decide the pending representation of fhe petitioner within stipulated period, to which learued counsel for the respondents No. 1 and 2 has no objection. 3. Accordingly, the respondent No.4 is directed to consider and decide the representetion dated 31.7.2006 (Annexure P/3) of fhe petitioners, in accordaace with law, on its own merit, withia a period offourweeks froni the date of receipt/ prodiiction of a copy of this oixler. 3. With tlie above observation this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. ~ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ThAm-