THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1906 OF 2010 DT.30.04.2010 Between: Pamulapati Bhagat Singh ……………Petitioner Vs. Dr.D.Murali and another …………….Respondents. O R D E R: The petitioner who is plaintiff in the suit filed this revision petition aggrieved by the order passed in I.A.No.445 of 2009 in O.S.No.1678 of 2007, dated 17.11.2009 on the file of I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, wherein and whereby the application purported to have been filed by the petitioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 C.P.C., praying to appoint an Advocate-Commissioner for local inspection and also observe plaint A & B schedule properties was dismissed by the court below by taking into account the conduct of the petitioner. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also perusing the material placed before this court, especially the detailed reasons given by the court below in dismissing the said application, I do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the court below. The revision petition is, therefore, dismissed. No costs. ________________ B.PRAKASH RAO J., Dt.30.04.2010 tjs