r \^ pacjma HI61-1 COUCT OPadHArraSSARIlATKn.ASWR Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri J<gdish Bhalla, ^9 C.J. Petitioners Respondents '•n^..; Wrlt f^tition No.2941 of 1994 1. Ms Meena Kumari, wife of Rajesh Kumar Sdhu, ^ed obout 26 yea-s, resident of village J'halkhdmoriya, Trfisil Mdiasamund, &istt.Raipyr. 2. Pyoreld, Son of Late Domar Sirgh Sohu, aged abwrt 40 years, resident of Vi Ilage Sonkcr, Tahsil Balod. &istt.E>ur9 Versus 1. Bisheshfou' Singh Sohu, cged about 88 yews, son of late Dtmiar Singh, resideftt of Villoge Sonkcra, Tflhsil B<rioci.E>ist't'.t>urg. 2. St<!rt-eofA(U>,thr6tghCollector,&ur9 3. Oistt.Judge, Durg. 4. Civitjudge, Closs II, Balod, t)istt.bur9. PetLtion ynder Article227 oftheGonstitutionofIndia Present: ShriNKAgr'uiwal.&yA&ifortheState/respondents No.2to4. ORALOR&ER (Passed on 14th June, 2007) Shri NK A9r<n»al,Dy A6 has informed this Court that the tcni has chan9ed and as per amended Civil Procedure Code, this petition is not maintainable. Me further submits that this petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dlsmissed ce having become infructuous. ^ ;Acting Chief Justice