IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5030 of 2010 BAIDYANATH PRASAD SINGH, son of Late Jangi Singh, resident of Village Rup Narayanpur, P.O. Neknampur, Via-Deoria, P.S. Paroo, District Muzaffarpur. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Director, Land Acquisition Department, Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Jamshedpur. 4. The Land Acquisition Officer, Jamshedpur. 5. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Chandil, Distt Jamshedpur. 6. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 25.3.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State as also Mr N.N. Ojha, learned counsel appearing for the State of Jharkhand. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner superannuated on 30th of September, 1985 from the post of Surveyor while working in the office of the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Chandil within the District of Jamshedpur and thereafter he is still receiving the pension. It is submitted that, however, the pension of the petitioner was required to be revised in terms of the Finance Department Circular as contained in letter no.11557 dated 22.12.1999 (Annexure 1), which has not been revised despite his representation dated 7.12.2009, as contained in Annexure 2. Learned counsel for the State submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law at the earliest. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the 2 petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the aforesaid grievances, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Director, Land Acquisition Department, Bihar, Patna (respondent no.2), with a copy to the District Magistrate, Jamshedpur (respondent no.3) and the Land Acquisition Officer, Jamshedpur (respondent no.4). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of his claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, respondent no.2 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled at the earliest and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with permissible interest, if any. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)