^ tlNGLE BEWCH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fS.)NO. ^SJb /2011 PETITIONER < ^.^^ ^^ ..^•' ^^ ^ RESPONDENTS Smt.Kamlesh Singh Wd/o Dr.T.P. Singh, Bishram Jagde, Aged about 59 years, Occupation Service, Posted Nursing Sister, Civil Hospital, Kharsia District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Health and Farnily Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raip.ur (C.G.) <^-" 2." Director, Directarate Health Services, Chhattisgarh Raipur 3. Chief Medical Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) ^" 4. ' Collector Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 5. Block Medical Officer, Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF 1NDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. The petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under : QV PETITIONER HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BILASPUR WR!T PETiTION (S) N0. 531 4 OF 2011 Smt. Kamiesh Singh Versus RESPQNDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others i (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india) Slnale Bench : Hon'bis Shri Satlsh K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Manoj Jaiswai, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the Stat®. ORDERCORAL) (Passed on this 09th day of September, 2011) 1. Chalienge in this petition is to the order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P-1), vvhereby, the petitioner working as Nursing Sister at Civii Hospital Kharsia, has been transferred to Community Health Center, Lailunga, on administratjve grounds. 2. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner Is going to retire in June; 2012. Thus, at the fag end of his service career. the petltioner should not be transferred, as there is a restriction in transfer of the empioyees, who have one year or !ess for superannuation, as perthe poilcyoftheStateGovemment. 3. Shri Sao, iearned Govt. Advocate, appearing for the State/respondents, fairiy submits that If a representation is made by the petitJoner, the same shaii be considered and decided, in acGordance with Savv, as early as possibie. In the meantime, tiii the decision is taken, no effect to the impugned order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P-1)in respect of the petitioner sha!! be given. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of foregoing, nothing survives for adjudication in the matter at this stage. 5. Accordingly, the writ petltion stands disposed of. Sattsi^^ffl 3ud^ ashok