IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 1ST JANUARY 2008 / 11TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 25817 of 2004(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ ANNIE PAUL, AGED 41 YEARS, W/O. P.A. PAUL, PADUPURACKAL HOUSE, UDAYAM PEROOR, MANAKUNNAM VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.A.T.ANILKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE GENERAL MANAGER, DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTER, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE TAHASILDAR, KANAYANOOR TALUK. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MANAKUNNAM VILLAGE. BY G.P. SMT.SMITHA SUKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE DT.30.8.1994. P2: COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY R1 DT.25.6.2004. P3: COPY OF NOTIFICATION DT.5.10.2002. P4: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DT.10.10.2002. P5: .DO. DT.10.9.03. P6: LETTER ISSUED BY R1 DT.10.10.03. P7: TRUE COPY OF R.R. NOTICE DT.30.1.2004. TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... W.P.(C) No.25817 of 2004 .................................................................... Dated this the 1st day of January, 2008. JUDGMENT The petitioner is relying on Ext.P3 publication in the newspaper wherein the Government is seen to have given certain incentives for repayment of margin money loan. It is not known whether the report is authentic or whether there is any subsequent order by the Government. Even though the W.P. is pending for the last three years, no counter is seen filed by any of the respondents. The W.P. is therefore disposed of directing the first respondent to consider incentives for the petitioner based on Government orders and inform her the actual liability exclusive of incentves granting reasonable time to make payment. If petitioner fails to make payment, then respondents 2 and 3 will proceed for recovery. The petitioner will produce copy of this judgment before the first respondent who is directed to issue revised demand within two weeks from production of the judgment. The first respondent will take into account the payment already made by the petitioner under interim orders of this court and order recovery based on balance liability and incentives if any granted by the Government. The interim order of stay will continue till 31.3.2008 and 2 thereafter recovery will be based on orders to be issued by the first respondent as directed above. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms