IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 2911 of 2008. Decided on 25th August, 2010. _____________________________________________________ Smt. Matangi Sharma. …Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant A.G. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Ranjan Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty reserved to his client to make a representation to respondent No. 2 for the redressal of her grievance. 2. Consequently, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation for the redressal of her grievance to respondent No. 2 within a period of three weeks from today. Thereafter, the same shall be decided by the respondent No. 2 in accordance with law by passing a speaking order, within a further period of ten weeks after the receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. 3. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge August 25, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?