IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M- 34535 of 2010 Date of decision:- 06.1.2011. Rakesh Khanna and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Hemant Sarin, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.S. Virk, DAG Haryana. Mr. Munish Kapila, Advocate for respondent No.2. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has put in appearance and states that the respondent No.2 has compromised the matter with the petitioners and nothing survives in the petition. Divorce has been granted and she has no objection if the FIR (Annexure P-1) alongwith consequential proceedings is quashed. In view of compromise (Annexure P-2), FIR No.106 dated 20.4.2007 under Sections 498-A,406 and 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Palam Vihar, Gurgaon (Annexure P-1) alongwith consequential proceedings is hereby quashed. Petition is disposed of accordingly. January 06, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Vijay Asija JUDGE