THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 24776 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner filed MP SR No.27 of 2011 before the Labour Court- II, Hyderabad claiming certain amounts. Through order, dated 15.02.2011, the Labour Court rejected the application by stating some reasons. The petitioner feels aggrieved by the same. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. The amounts claimed by the petitioner include gratuity, arrears under pay revision, leave encashment etc. Obviously because these amounts were not determined in prior adjudication, the Labour Court rejected the application. It hardly needs any mention that an application under Section 33-C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 can be filed only for recovery of the amounts as regards which there is no dispute or the amounts that were already determined in different set of proceedings. The claim of the petitioner does not fit into that. Therefore, it cannot be said that there is any error in the order passed by the Labour Court. The petitioner can certainly make a representation to the respondents claiming the benefits mentioned in the miscellaneous petition. Depending upon the reaction of the respondents, he can certainly pursue further remedies. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents claiming various benefits. . The respondents, in turn, shall pass orders, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:06.09.2011 kdl