BE .%S. ..UJ;. $ IN THS HIGH _C©0'S3?,OF: WiaQCTtJRB \^ l3aa^3:SQ&BH^'B:[SRSPET& w^ ss^i^i'aes'^^^Syssw:. Kaadas Hani3al RStre» S/o '&a^e: Shci; Bfaa<geiaiand •Mandal :B^'fere^age<3'/ ataoBt '46 ::yeass:.. • .. -CasaieE''^nefaargeiJ^'. •;.:'-'. '':.',:'':'1,. PQiy.at> .Blg-fcioaal', BaBlEf'.' "- • :. ,&ehanaKMar^Bi^as@ar>-495113 ;;.: yersas ^.':. .::: . •:. • l.The^Puaja^ S^tleaai^Bank^ _ Shreaghs^'ts-'zeuaal ^.MaaageiS .;' •' 3'awafaar ^basaseBpsbsSSsa^tSSakSi. ^epaKM.y)' ;"-m':~-'-'~" '"~''':'. : '•i: 2«Paajab Ba-tional Banfc ; . . 'lSiroagfai Tts : Eeglohal, tiaaager^ "/. Medj.cal:, celleae..Rea^d»:.:,.i';.',.;,.:'..,•. • Ka^Sa.aES. Qaaw^f RaltwE'^OWa'trfeiSsaBN. 3'iSI'he ;BEaiaeh Hanages'l' •- . tuajab Nat:i®aal',Bank ', _ ' &chai»aknar Braaeh . j Vla Kota»,:;IBi.s-fc1:»Bil.aSBlE«-'. : . :"K 1 ::^i <5^? PETITIONER HRDBRftRTICLE :226/227 ©ETHE CONSTIT@$I0B OP jINSES ^ XI-HC-22 'S^'^iraRra, »Tll'9i|(o, f»l(1!<iy ^fi 311^1 ^il Wl* Sf^l ^HT^'^ffcT chi^Etn^'r 'qn^rf ^ ft1[zt <pii-^i< . ^? sipOT 3n^?r Shri P.S.Koshi learned coun^el for the petitioner. In spite of registered nol^ices issued to the respondents in the month of May,2001,none repr^sents them tiH today. The reliefs sought for in t^iis petition crs that the petitioner shouid be re-instated on the po^t which he was holding when ths order of suspension was issued ^ind that he is entitled to all back wages ond other service b^nefits including nor-ma! annual increments and pay revisions etc. The petitioner joined th^ service as cierk on 29.12.83. SubsequentSy, the petitioner was prosnoted as Teiler. While serving as Teller,consequent to certain ^omplaint lodged on the allegation of some discrepancy / shortag^ of ccish in the bank, the writ petitioner <md two others wer^ placed under suspension with effect from 22.1.87. After th^ investigation was over, chargs- sheet was submjtted and the ^rit petitioner was tried by the Judicial Magistrate First Class.paipur. The petitioner was found guiity cmd he was convicted by <yder ddted 20.4.99. Subsequently, 1 : by order dorted 5.7.99 the petitiqner was dismissed from service on { the ground that he had been con^icted by the Criminal Court. Being aggrieved,the petitioner preferr^d an appeai before the District and Sessions 'or:<%-*-<:latecT215,TOi,9l?-ffie;5 "?--' T" '??at;T3iI^T ^-.fT^ ~v!!^a •^-- <*i<ii'~l41-1 'iMrS'? fs<S <r>]^i< ^; aipgiT .SIT^T preferred by the wri^ petitioner was allowed and ths petitioner was acquitted honourably. The said order of acquittal has not been challen9ed by the responplents. Thereafter, the writ petitioner submitted a representation for his re-instatement. By order dated 10.4.2000 the petitioner was re-instated but it was done in the capacir' of Cashier. Shri Koshi submit^ that the petitioner ought to have been re- |as Cashier is slightly iower in. "tatus thon As recorded above, nor^e represents the respondents. I have perused the re^levont document^placed on of Shri P.S.Koshi and I^ have also heard the subinissions made by Shri Koshi. j In view of the fact tijat the petitioner has been re-instated and Sessions Jud9e,Raipur, in my opinion, he diouid hcve been re-instated ii said status and capacity 4s tl1at of Teller and also pa/ !. the petitioner was dra^ing at the time of suspension ai on re-iristatement. Further I am of the petitioner was apquitted honourably, he would to the back wages,normal annuai increments ond view that h"ve been In the result, this petjtion is allowed. The petitioner is entitled to aii back wages with effect from the date of suspension tiii The date of re-instatement. The |)etitioner also is entitled to -t XI-HC-22 T^ ^HM^, 0Tll'M'!S, fs(WI+iy ani^i'qii R;-fi* sn^r sctfi'* ^1?!I sn^i^aiwHftg l^i<4[<n41i ^ii^t'i*?'^ Fs^ <[^f-Ki< ^srfigii sn^r re-instatement in the status of T^ISer altowances to which he was entitlefcl petitioner is also entitled to the a!so to th®pay revisions which hwfe and in the scale of pay at the time of suspension. ihormal cannual increments '^ been brought into force Certified copy cs per rules. ChiefJustice