-"':<fl;?fl1' i-ullaBUUS!^3S^aa<SW^..- mrc TU 0 (\3) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DiVISIONBENCH Applicants no. HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR S1NHA, J. M.A.CCS (PR) No. 1265 Of 2007 1. Radheshyam, aged about 46 yeare 2. Neelkanth, aged about 43 years Both sons of Late Shri Gangaram, Residents of village - Chicha, Tah. and District Durg (C.G.) Versus 1. Milan S/o Shri Sonu Ganda, aged about 44 years, Motor Driver, R/o Supela - Bhilai, Tahsil & Distt. Durg 2. Abdul Aziz S/o Shri Sheikh Ismail, Aged about 54 years, resident of Kelabidi, Durg. Tah. & Distt. Durg (C.G.) 3. M. Madhvan Nair S/o Shri Narain Kurup, R/o Sector — 4, Lane no.-8, Quarter no.- 12-A, Bhilai Nagar, Tahsil & Distt. Durg (C.G.) 4. The National Insurance Company Ltd. Raipur, Through - its Divisional Manager, National tnsurance Co. Ltd. Divisional Office - Marhatal, Jabaipur (M.P.) Merriorandum of Appeal Under Section-2 of Chhattisaarh Hiah Court (Aopeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006 Present: None appears for the appellants. RAJESH KUMAR SONTEKE Digitally signed by RAJESH KUMAR SONTEKE Date: 2025.02.05 10:35:54 +0530 ;;: 1 :-^r ^=. '1ifl~ ^fe' '?! Ss; ^K^ y ORDER (4th July, The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None appears for the appetlants. 2. The Registry has raised objections about the maintainability of the appeal. 3. The appellants have filed this appeat against the order dated 23-02-2007, passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in M.A.No. 262/1994. 4. Section 100(A) of the Code of Civil Procedure which bars further appeal in certain cases reads as follows:- further appeal in certain cases. - Notwithstanding anything contained in any Letters Patent for any High Court or in any other instrument having the force of iaw or in any other law for the time being in force, where any appeal from an original or appellate decree or order is heard and decided by a single judge of a High Court, no further appeat shall lie from the judgment and decree of such single Judge." 5. In view of the express bar contained in the above quoted Section 100(A) of the Code of Civit Procedure, the present appeal filed by the appellants against the order passed by the teamed Single Judge in exercise of appellate jurisdiction is not maintainable. 6. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed as not maintainable. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge nirnrn!