IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44493 of 2009 1. SURENDRA VERMA @ SURENDRA PD.VERMA. 2. UPENDRA VERMA @ UPENDRA PRASAD VERMA. 3. SOHAN VERMA @ SOHAN KUMAR VERMA. 4. BORHAN YADAV @ BORHAN PRASAD YADAV. 5. ADHIK YADAV, BOTH SONS OF RAUDI YADAV. 6. AMIR YADAV, BOTH SONS OF RAMGULAM YADAV. 7. NAKAT YADAV, SON OF RAUDI YADAV. 8. RAUDI YADAV, SON OF LATE PURAN YADAV. 9. AMOLI YADAV, SON OF MUNGAR YADAV. 10. LALAN YADAV @ BHURI YADAV, SON OF AMOLI YADAV. 11. RANJEET YADAV @ RANJEET KUMAR YADAV, SON OF BORHAN YADAV, ALL RESIDENT OF BARUNA, P.s. SIKANDRA, DISTRICT- JAMUI. …….PETITIONERS. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR. 2. GOBIND YADAV, SON OF BAIDYA NATH YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BARUNA, P.S. SIKANDRA, DISTT.- JAMUI. ……OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- Advocate for the Petitioners:- Prabhat Ranjan Singh, Adv. Advocate for the State:- Damodar Pd. Tiwary, A.P.P. 3 08.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and for the State. This is an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, seeking quashing of order dated 16.10.2009, passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Jamui in Criminal Revision No. 65 of 2007 arising out of Sikandra P.S. Case No. P.S. Case No. 49 of 2003. The main grievance against the order under challenged is that the learned Sessions Judge has observed something in his order on merit. In view of the above, it is 2 made clear that without being prejudiced, observations on merit, if any, by Sessions Judge, the court below itself pass appropriate order on going through the materials available on record. With these observations this application stand disposed of at admission stage. Bhardwaj/ (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)