IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 13th day of August 2002 Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 702 of 2002 Order on the Bail Application of the accused-Sahjad Ali S/o Mumtaz R/o Mohammadpur Mohanpur P.S. Kotwali Roorkee district Haridwar AND Bail Application no. 699/2002 Suleman Ahmad S/o Munfaith R/o Mohammadpur Mohanpur P.S. Kotwali Roorkee district Haridwar CRIMINAL SIDE Sahjad Ali S/o Mumtaz R/o Mohammadpur Mohanpur P.S. Kotwali Roorkee district Haridwar AND Suleman Ahmad S/o Munfaith R/o Mohammadpur Mohanpur P.S. Kotwali Roorkee district Haridwar …………………….Accused Versus State of Uttaranchal. Party ……………….Opposite Arising out of Case Crime No. 169 of 2000 Under Section 147/148/149/307/452/336/302 IPC Police Station-Kotwali Roorkee district Haridwar By the Court Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. These two bail applications relate to the same crime number and incident and, therefore, are being disposed of by this common order. This is third bail application on behalf of Suleman whereas it is IVth bail application on behalf of Sahjad Ali. Both the applicants have wielded firearms. The deceased Yamin appears to have not sustained firearm injuries but three other injured were caused firearm injuries. It has been informed that substantive evidence in the trial has been recorded. Considering the role assigned to the applicants, I am of the view that it is not a fit case for bail. (Irshad Hussain, J.) August 13,2002. M.P.S.