IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17024 of 2008 PRADEEP KUMAR KANAUJIA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2/ 06.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The claim of the petitioner relates to the year 1998-99. Some part of the payments has been made but some part has not been made. Petitioner has produced a report which relates to the year 2007. From the report it appears that no clear direction was issued for payment of the dues as the amount claimed by the petitioner was not fit to be accepted. The concerned authority, i.e., the Circle Officer does not certify the extent of work which has been done by the petitioner. Due to the dispute in this regard, no direction can be made for payment to the petitioner. If he could convince the authority about his bonafide claim, he can do needful. The writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J ) BTiwary/