y HIGB COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Petitioners 9. Wnt.Petition No. _l2W of2006 Fateh Singh, S/o Shri Gennan Singh, aged about 45 years, Meinber,. Market Coiniiuttee, Krishi Upaj Maadi Samiti, Pendra, District Bilaspur (Chliattisgarh) Munui Bai, W/o Shri Bhagat Mem.ber, Market Coinaiittee, Krisbi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Pendra, Distnct Bilaspiir [Chhattisgarh] Budhia Bai, W/o Shri Budhlal, Meiaber, Market Coiiuiiittee, Krishi Upaj Maadi Samiti, Pendra, District Bilaspur Versus Respondents 1. State of Cbliattisgarh, through Cliief Secretaiy, Departinent of Agriculture, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Siagh. Bhawan, Raipur (Chliattisgai-h) CoUector, Pendra Road, Bilaspur, appointed as District Election OfE.cer (Mandi) Distdct BUaspur (Chhattisgai-h) Additional CoUector, Pendra Road, District Bilaspur, appoiuted as an Authorized Officer Maadi Elections, Pendra, Distiict Bflaspur (Chattisgarh) Returuing Officer, Mandi Electiort, Pendra, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) SIiri Puran Chhabaiiya, S/o Totahnal Cliha'bariya, aged about 45 years, R/o Vfflage Pendra, Tebsil Pendra, Dist. BUaspur (Chtiattisgarh) (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Honlsle Shri SaUsh K. Agnihotri J.) Shii Amrito Das, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Alok Bakslii, Govt. Advocate for tlie respondents No. 1 to 4. Shri A. V. SbricUiar, Advocate for fhe respondent No.5. 2. o. 4. 5. ( Passed on this 30A day ofJune, 2009 Leamed counsel appeariiig for the petitioner, on iiistnictions, subinits that \vith the passage of time this writ petition has becoiue uifriictuous. ^"'\ i I, "~ J / \. \"^/ '^ 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no 3. objection. Accordingly, flie petition is dismissed as haviag becoine infructuous. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^