@ HHI‘H COURT OF CHEAT HSGARH AT BILASEJR Writ Pemmn ( , L ‘3 3993 0f 29%3 PETETEONER : Umesh Paiiwal, aged about 34 years, S/o Shri F.L. Paiiwai, Transporter, R/o Main Road, Naila, Janjgir, Distt. Janigir Chamapa (CG). VERSUS 1. State ’of Chhattisgarh, ThrOugh: the Secretaly, Department of Food & Civil Supplies, DKS Building, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). 2. Chairman, Chhattisgarh State Civii Suppiies ' Corporation Ltd. Raipur (CG). 3. Managing Direcior, Chhattisgarh State Civii Supplies Co poiation Ltd Raipur(CG) 4. Distrlct Manager Chhattisgaih State C1v11 Supplies Corpmatlon Ltd Mahasamund (CG) RES?ONBENTS (WPJT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON’S'I‘I'l‘U'l‘ION OF INDIA) (S3: Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present : Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate General for the State. Shri Vivek Ranjan Tiwan', Advocate for the respondent No. 2, 3, & 4 ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 25 day of July, 2!}93) . With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merit at this stage. 1t is further submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation with a direction to respondent No, 2,3 8c: 4 to consider the same, in accordance with law, on its own. merit. 3. Shri Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2,3, & 4, submits that there is no reason as to why'the representation tiled by the petitioner may not be decided in accordance with law, the same shall be decided within a period offour weeks from the date of receipt of representation. 4. In View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. No order Sd/— iSatish K. Agnihctri Judge