CRM No. M-6767 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-6767 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 31.03.2011 Ravi ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Mohit Garg, Advocate, for Mr. Manoj Makkar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Present petition is filed seeking regular bail in case FIR No.190 dated 11.5.2010 under Sections 363/366/376/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Police Station Sampla Tehsil & District Rohtak. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that prosecutrix in her statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. has stated that present petitioner has took her on motorcycle to Sonepat and no allegation of rape was levelled against the petitioner/accused in the statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana, took me to statement of prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. Perusal of the statement of the prosecutrix under Section 164 Cr.P.C. would reveal that Deepak another accused took her to one room near the police chowki of village CRM No. M-6767 of 2011 (O&M) -2- on the knife point; there Deepak called his friend Ravi (present petitioner/accused) and both of them raped her there. After committing rape both of them took her to Sonepat on motorcycle and from Sonepat Ravi went back and thereafter Deepak took her to many places and has raped her at each and every place. From the statement of the prosecutrix under Section 164 Cr.P.C., it cannot be said that there is no allegation of rape against the present petitioner. Statement of the prosecutrix is yet to be recorded in the trial Court. At this stage I am not inclined to grant bail to the accused. Dismissed. (Alok Singh) Judge March 31, 2011 R.S.