1N 'IHE HIGH mURT OFJUDICATURE CHI-IATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MISC APPEAL No. i€IA mm A National Insurance Company Ltd., Registered OEce 3, Middle Town Street, Calcutta, Through The Branch Manager National Insurance Company Ltd, Bilaspur, Appellant Versus 1%sponients Sudhim Ram, aged about 4S years, S/o Heerala] Marar Rajanram, aged about 16 years, S/o Sudhim Marar Govindram aged about 6 years, Sio Sudhim Marat 4. k. Girijabai aged about 8 years, S/o Sudhim Marar Respondents 2,3 & 4 are minor and therefore through their natural guardian and father Sudhim Ram Marar All Rio Village Aam Gaon, Tehsil Chuikhadan, RS. Salhebara, Dist : Rajnandgaon (C.G.). Respondents 1 to 4 are claimants before the court below. 5.; Sukhdeo alias Sanju Pandey, aged about 40 years, S/o Dwarika Prasad, R/o Khadi RS. Salhebara, Dist : Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 6. 76LSandeep Agarwal, aged about 30 years, S/o Govind Agarwa], R/o Salhebara, Dist : Rajriafggaoh (C.G.) MISCELLANEOUS APPM U/S 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT. Claim in appeal Court fee aiiixed Being aggrieved by the impugned award dt.27.09.2001 passed by Shri R.C.S. Samanth, Addl. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Khairagarh, Dist : Rajnandgaon (C.G.) in claim case 110.25 / 98, the appellant Insurance Company prefers this memo ofappeal on the following facts and grounds amongst others. Valued at Rs.74,000.00 “/MM Worth Rs. 15.00 R £0 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BELASPUR MA N0: 30 0f2002. Appeal under Saction 173 ofthe Motor Vehiclas Ast, SB: Hon’ble Shri Justice N. K, Agamal Present : Shri Gautam Khetrapal, Advocate for the appellant, None for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 9m day 0f August, 2010) . Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that since 2.002 the amount required to be statutorily deposited has not been deposited by the appellant though the appellant has deposited Rs. 50,000/— as no fault compensation, and thus seeks permission of this court to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file legally constituted appeal. . On due consideration, prayer is allowed and the appellant is . Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn With the above stated liberty. No order asto costs. . Registry is directed to return the eertihe—d eopy of the inpngned order on counsel’s fumishing authenticated true copy ofthe same permitted to withdraw the appeal. Sahu Sdl— ’ : N.K.Agai’wal. Judge Appellant! National Insurance Company Ltd NA No. 3 Versus Respondents Sudhim Ram & Others