IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8737 of 2010 1. RAMKISHORE GIRI 2. Prabhu Giri Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 16.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that allegations made in the F.I.R. are apparently false as informant’s wages was due to the informant for collecting the same he went to petitioners’ business premises where all the adult family members were present and further a complaint filed on behalf of the informant’s wife in the year 2008 against the petitioners was pending only is sufficient to belie informant’s working to petitioners’ business premises. According to the learned counsel, really it was land dispute in between the parties and the privilege given to the weaker members of the Scheduled Caste is misused. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Hajipur S.C./S.T. P.S. Case No. 227 of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Jitesh Kumar, J.M., Ist Class, Motihari, Dist. East Champaran subject to the conditions as laid 2 down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Permission is granted to make necessary correction in the name of the petitioner no.1. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)