IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SA No.267 of 2005 SHIVNATH SINGH & ANR Versus PANA DEVI & ORS ----------- 06/ 15.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the appellants. This second appeal arises out of Title suit No. 179 of 1968 which was filed by the plaintiffs-appellants for declaration of title and recovery of possession with respect to the suit land and other ancillary reliefs. The aforesaid suit was dismissed by the learned Munsif-I, Siwan vide judgment and decree dated 10.08.1989 which was challenged by the plaintiffs-appellants in Title Appeal No. 94 of 1989 which was also dismissed by learned Additional District Judge-cum- Fast Track Court No.-II, Siwan vide judgment and decree dated 20.04.2005. Against the aforesaid judgments and decree of the learned courts below, the instant second appeal has been filed by the plaintiffs- appellants. Both the learned courts below have specifically found that partition took place after revisional survey in which the disputed land fell into the share of Goverdhan, who came in possession thereof as its rightful owner. The plaintiffs-appellants are basing their claims on the transfer made by one Mostt. Surji although she was neither an heir of Goverdhan nor she had got the property from him. Furthermore, the learned courts below also found that the aforesaid sale deed filed by the plaintiffs was not genuine and no title passed to the plaintiffs on its basis. 2 In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the impugned judgments and decree of the learned courts below are covered by finding of facts and no substantial question of law is involved in the instant second appeal, which is accordingly dismissed. harish (S.N. Hussain, J.)