IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1498 of 2010 1. PRIYANKA KUMARI W/O RAJESH KUMAR SHUKLA R/O VILL.- BARNA, P.O.- SAKHRA, P.S.- RAJPUR, DISTT.- ROHTAS Versus 1. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ROHTAS, NAMELY, MR. ANUPAM KUMAR. 2. DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER, ROHTAS, SASARAM, NAMELY RAMESH OJHA. 3. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, RAJPUR BLOCK, ROHTAS, NAMELY BIBHA RANI. 4. MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT BARNA, RAJPUR, NAMELY, BIMLA DEVI WIFE OF BAIJNATH PANDEY, AT YAKTA CHOK, DALMIANAGAR, P.S. DALMIA NAGAR, ROHTAS. 5. THE STATE OF BIHAR ---------- 04. 11.04.2011 In compliance of the orders of this Court dated 13.7.2009 the Collector, Rohtas has passed order dated 4.2.2011 in Case No.13 of 2010, which is contained in memo no.392 dated 18.2.2011 and has been enclosed with the show cause as Annexure-1, perusal whereof, however does not indicate that the copy of the said order has been given to the petitioner. In the circumstances, I dispose of the contempt petition granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 4.2.2011 before the Commissioner, Patna Division. The delay caused in filing the memo of appeal by the petitioner be condoned as petitioner received the information about the said order through this show cause. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)