IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 7353 of 2010 Date of Decision: 11.11.2010 Shakuntla Devi and others .... Petitioners Versus Devki Devi and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Amarjit Singh Virk, Advocate for the petitioners 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that a suit for declaration was filed by the plaintiffs-petitioners stating that parties have partitioned the properties and property in dispute has fallen in the share of the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs now wants to place on record the mortgaged deed and transfer deed executed by the defendants and their predecessor-in-interest stating therein that after the mutual partition they are the owners of the properties being transferred by them. Learned counsel for the petitioners further states that recital of the documents executed by the defendants would show that defendants themselves have admitted mutual partition between the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners further states that certified copies of the mortgaged deed and transfer deed executed by the defendants and their predecessor-in-interest shall be filed before the trial Court after taking leave from the trial Court and defendants shall be called upon to make admission or denial before C.R. No. 7353 of 2010 2 the trial Court. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition with aforesaid liberty. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (ALOK SINGH) 11.11.2010 JUDGE reena