IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.327 of 2009 The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Building Construction Department, Old Secretariat, Patna ……………… Petitioner Versus 1.Indradeo Prasad Chaudhary son of Kishun Ram Chaudhary, resident of village- Warsaliganj, P.S. Warsaliganj, District- Nawada, at present residing at Sector 4, Block No.1, M.I.G. Flat No.24, Bahadurpur Housing Colony, P.S. Sultanganj, District- Patna ………. Petitioner/Opp.Party 2.The State of Bihar through the Finance Commissioner, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.The Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4.The Accountant General (A & E)1, Bihar, Patna 5.The Principal Accountant General, Bihar & Jharkhand, Doranda, Ranchi ………….. Opp.Parties. ----------- 4. 28/07/2010 This review application has been filed on behalf of the State of Bihar through the Secretary, Building Construction Department. Ground for review raised in this application is that in the supplementary counter affidavit filed by the authorities in the writ matter, it was wrongly stated that no departmental proceeding has been initiated against petitioner and it was wrongly submitted by learned Standing Counsel No.11, after going through the records, that prior to superannuation of the petitioner, no departmental proceeding was initiated against him. In view of these mistakes committed on behalf of the respondents in the writ - 2 - application, writ application was allowed with certain observations and directions. Admittedly, no error of record was committed by this Court while passing the order in the writ matter. It was admittedly a mistake of respondents, if at all. Therefore, this Court does not find any merit in the review application. The review application is, therefore, dismissed. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)