IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 847 OF 2009 GOA STEELS LIMITED ... Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF GOA THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ryan Menezes, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. P. Talaulikar, Addl. Government Advocate for Respondent. Coram:- NARESH H. PATIL & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 2nd March, 2010 P.C. Consequent to the order passed on 17.12.2009, both the parties inform this Court that the petitioner had deposited Rs. 50,00,000/-(Rupees fifty lakhs only)which is deposited in the Registry of this Court. 2. The learned Senior Counsel, Mr. Nadkarni submits that Rs. 13,00,000/-(Rupees thirteen lakhs only) have already been deposited with the State Government. 3. The learned Advocate General does not dispute this statement. 4. According to the Counsel at present, the amount under recovery comes to Rs. 1.51 crores. 5. Both, the learned Senior Counsel Mr. Nadkarni and the learned Advocate General state that the recovery initiated against the petitioner was to the tune of 1,63,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore sixty three lakhs only) out of which 63,00,000/-(Rupees sixty three lakhs only) the petitioner has deposited. 6. In the facts of the case and without prejudice to the rights of the parties, we direct that the petitioner shall deposit the remaining amount in 20 equal monthly installments starting from 10.3.2010 onwards with the Government. 7. Learned Counsel Mr. Nadkarni submits that the petitioner's right to approach the Grievances Cell/Dispute Redressal Committee be kept open. It is accordingly kept open. 8. The learned Advocate General seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the amount of Rs. 50,00,000/- in case the same is not withdrawn. 9. We allow the respondent, The Chief Electrical Engineer, Government of Goa, to withdraw amount of Rs. 50,00,000/-(Rupees fifty lakhs only) with accrued interest thereon, from the Registry of this Court which was deposited by the petitioner. 10. The learned Advocate General on instructions makes a statement that incase the petitioner follows the schedule of payment, DPC will not be charged from the petitioner from the concerned date. This arrangement will be subject to the outcome and decision of alternate forum. 11. All contentions of the contesting parties are kept open. 12. In case the petitioner defaults in making the payment of monthly installments, the remaining amount shall be recoverable forthwith, and the facility of the installment would stand automatically withdrawn. 13. Writ Petition stand disposed of. NARESH H. PATIL, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. MF/-