1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3918 OF 2008 Sayyab (Saiyub) Ali Yunus Ali .. Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr.A.K.Upadhya for the applicant. Mr.J.P.Yagnik A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2008. DATED : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2008. DATED : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2008. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.88 of 2008 of Dadar police station, Mumbai. The said crime has been registered against the applicant and one another for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 363, 376 r/w 34 of the IPC. I have perused an FIR lodged by the prosecutrix dated 6.4.2008. The only role attributed to the present applicant is that he brought the prosecutrix from Calcutta to Bombay and left her at her Maternal Uncle’s house. There are no allegations against him of having committed offence under section 376 of IPC. The main allegations are against the brother of the applicant i.e. accused no.1, who had allegedly 2 2 2 induced the prosecutrix to go with him to Calcutta for attending the marriage in his family and there committed the offence under section 376 of IPC. Having regard to the allegations against the applicant and considering that he is in jail since last about five months, I am inclined to enlarge him on bail: . The applicant be released on bail in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or two local sureties of the like amount subject to condition that he shall report to the concerned police station on every Saturday between 7.00 p.m. and 8.00 p.m. for a period of three months from today and thereafter on 1st Saturday of every month between 7.00 p.m. and 8.00 p.m. till conclusion of the trial. . While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case without being influenced by the observations made in this order. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)