HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BXLASPUR, WRIT PETITION No. 2677 of 2006 Murit Ram Sahu, aged about 56 years, s/o Late Shri C.R.Sahu, resident of village and Post Risdi, Tehsil and District Korba (CG) ‘ VERSUS RES?ONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Depmtment of Urban Administration, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Municipal Corporation, Korba, through Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Korba (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Aggjgotri, J. Present: 3. Estate Officer, Municipal Corporation Korba (CG) Shri Dheeraj Wankhede, Advocate appearing on behalf of Shri R.S.Marhas, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent-l Shri Sanjay K. Agrawai, Advocate with Shri Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate for the respondent No. 2 and 3. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 04 day of February, 2009) Learned counsel appearing tor the petitioner submits that in View ofthe averments made in the return dated 03.03.2007 whereby it is stated that the petitioner has applied for grant of piot in newly developed Gokul Nagar Scheme on 11.05.2005 (Annexure R/2-D) and the petitioner has been allotted a plot in Gokul Nagar Scheme on 29.03.2006 (Annexure R/2-E). The petitioner has deposited the requisite amount alsp and possession ofthe said plot has already been handed over. In view of that, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that nothing survives in this matter. However, the petitioner may be granted liberty to adjudicate the issue if a new cause of action arises. No liberty is necessary as new cause of action is not the subject matter of the instant petition. In View ofthe foregoing, this petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M(W)P No. 2020/2006, also stands disposed of. MSd/ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge PETITIONER W