$§mgm 393mb 4 ‘\¢)o( / ’% IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. c No.£252.or 2011 AnjUmon Committee, Post & PoHce Chowki, Vijoynogor, Thono & Tohsil Romanujgcmj, Districf Surgujo ihrough its President, AtouHoh, son of Mohommed Ali, oged about 48 yeors. PETITIONER RESPONDENT$ / VERSUS / I. Stote of Chhottisgorh,through Secretory, Generol Administration Department, MontroloyoDou Kolyon Singh Bhowon, Roipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) state of Chhottisgorh,through Secretory, Department of Town, & Country Planning, Mantralaya Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Collector, Surguja District Surguja (Chhottisgarh) Dy. Inspector General of Police Surguja Range, Surguja (CG) Superintendent of Police, Balrampur, District Balrampur (Chhattisgarh) Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Ramanujganj, District Surguja (Chhattisgarh) Tahsildar, Ramanujganj District Surguja (Chhattisgarh) Sarpanch, Gram Panchoyat, Vijay Nagor,Tah Ramanuganj, Janpad Panchayat, P.Halka Ramchandrapur, District Surguja (Chhattisgarh) Chowki lncharge, Vuaynagar Police, District Balrampur (CG) 4M V © %~/ WRIT PETlTlON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARII MANDAMUSI PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS ORDER OR ORDERS: / ML HK‘TH COURT OF CHHA'T’I‘ISGARH AT BHASPUR WRIT PETITION {C} No: 6252 0f2011 PE’I‘ITIONER imjuman Commas. VERSUS RESPONDENTS State ofChhaftisgarh & Others; WRIT PETI'HON UNDER ARIICLE 226 OF THE CONS'I‘ITU'UON OF INDIA SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. Aanihntri. J. Present: Smt. Fouzia Mirm with Shri Neeraj 'Mehta. Adwcate for i’he petitioner. qhn Amn San). ADvocate for the State/respondent Nu. ’i i0 7 & 9. Shri V,K.Pandev. Advocate for the Caveator, ORDER ORAL) (Passeé 011 19 day of October, 2011) 1. "£116 patitioner seeks appropriate writ quashing and seiting aside tha procemings initiatad by the respnndent authorities to alEoI. ihe land to the Police Chowki; Vijainagar. which is peuding consideration before the, Tahsiidag Pal. Ramanujganj: DiStrict Surguja, and to declare tho same to be illegal mo inooerative in law. 2. Smt, Mirza, leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the resoondent authorities are initiating action and proceeding for \ allotting the land in dispute i.e, Khasra No. 3()10/2, area 4,047 hectaresi for Police Chowki at Vijainagar‘ which has already been earmarked for ldgah on which for the last many years, the petitiohers have been observhig religious performances. 3. Sim. Mirza, learned counsel aypearing for the petitioner submits that durhw pendency of the proceedihgs before the 'l‘ahsildar in respect of the allotment of the land, in dispute: the police authorities are using undue force to remove the petitioner iiom the land. Thus the W Amit /@3 2 respondem authorities may be directed mt take coercive stem against the petitiener till the preceedings pending before the Tahsildar is finally decided, Be that as it may if there is any gievance with regard. i0 alleged lindue and illegal actiQn by the police autheritiee, the 'I‘ahsildar hearing the Droeeedings pending before him with regard to the above dispute, may consider: if an application ie made by the petitioner in this regard and therealier. the Tahsildar may pass appropriate order in accordance with law“ . With the aforesaid observation and directioni the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- SATISH K. ANGNH-IORI Judge