IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 21892 of 2000 Between: 1 M.Venkata Rao, S/o Raju Babu, Resident of H.No.49-98-653, N.G.Os Colony, Akkaipalem, Visakhapatnam District. 2 D.Appala Raju, S/o Chinna simhachalam, R/o 32-9-160, Muralidhar Estate, Behind Manohar Theatre, Visakhapatnam District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Visakhapatnam District. 2 Sri Rama Co-operative Buildings Society Limited, Dabagardens, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 3 The Co-operative Tribunal Rep. by its Secretary, Vijayawada. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated 10-4-1995 passed by the 1st Respondent in Procs. Rc.No.1444/92-C as conﬁrmed by the Third Respondent through its common order dt: 22-2-2000 in O.A.No.76/95 and O.A.No.2 of 2000 as being illegal, arbitrary and consequently set aside the same Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: None appears. Since the learned counsel for the petitioners was not present nor was there any representation on his behalf on 27-08-2008, writ petition is posted ‘for dismissal’ today. Today, when the case is called, learned counsel for the petitioners is not present nor is there any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _______________ 28th August, 2008 SKM