IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-37658 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 14.12.2011 Karnail Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents ………. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. C.L. Pawar, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner is being pressurized by respondent No.4 to pay the outstanding amount to respondent No.5 out of the business transaction between the petitioner and respondent No.5. He further states that police have absolutely no jurisdiction to pressurize the petitioner to pay the alleged outstanding amount out of the business transaction. Further contends that respondent No.5 has efficacious remedy to file suit for rendition of account and recovery of amount, if so wishes, but he should not be permitted to get recovered the amount through the police. I find some force in the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Present petition is disposed of with the direction that petitioner shall move a representation before respondent No.3 within 3 days. Respondent No.3 shall personally look into the matter and shall take decision on the representation of the petitioner ( Alok Singh ) December 14, 2011 Judge Anand