AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.93 OF 2007 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.68 OF 2007 Vandana @ Bhavika Raju Totlani .... Applicant Vs. Raju Shyamalal Totlani. .... Respondents Mr. Ketan Chotani for the applicant. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATED : 17TH JUNE, 2008. P.C.:- 1. The appeal filed by the applicant-wife is admitted. This is an application praying that the impugned judgment and decree dated 29/1/2007 passed by the 6th Family Court dissolving the marriage be stayed. 2. On 13/8/2007 by consent of the parties, mediator was appointed. Mediator submitted his report dated 15/2/2008. He has stated that the parties had practically settled the matter. They were AJN 2 to bring consent terms. However, no consent terms were brought. On 10/6/2008, in our order, we noted this. We have expressed in our order that the settlement talks appears to have failed. 3. Today, though learned counsel for the wife is present, learned counsel for the husband is not present. In the affidavit in reply filed by the husband to the application praying for condonation of delay, the husband has stated that on 8/4/2007 he has been engaged to marry some other woman. Thereafter, admittedly, there is an order of status-quo operating in the field. In the circumstances of the case, ad-interim order passed by us on 3/5/2007 is confirmed and shall continue to operate during the pendency of this appeal. 4. Civil application is disposed of. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J.]