0‘26 Wm wfQfLwI/Q 200 31mm (Wm WWW WWW WW1?1%€TW %a’mm mmm B: Hon’ble Shri Manindr S a 24.6.2010 f Mr. B.P. Rao, counsel the petitioner. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, nel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.1. This petition is preferr d against the order dated 285.2010 (Annexuré P-l) by which th petitioner has been transferred from Higher School, Tangapani to M ddle’School- Jogibirdo. Learned counsel for the etitioner submits that he has preferred a representation against the or er of transfer on 3.6.2010 (Annexure P— 2) In the opinion of this C urt, at this stage, there is no reason to interfere with the order of t nsfer as the petitioner has preferred representation on 3.6.2010. wever, it would be in the interest of justice to direct respondent 0.2, to consider and pass appropriate order on petitioner’s represent tion. With the aforesaid obse ations, the petition is finally disposed off. ' l Sd/— Praveen \ Manindra Mohan Shrivastgygi Judge an Shrivastava h J. a o