@OURT FEES EXEMPTED Wmmrcmow no. gesol‘wmi- a js/rw Gr: mg As smmn awn $5 m SCHéDm ACT ma IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH w.P. (L) No. 11km /2009 "’ State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division — Kawardha, Kabirdhaln (C.G.) PETITIONER: VERSUS Chandra Kumar S/o — Samariilyédav, R/o — Mahama% Chowk, Pandariya, Tahsil- Pandariya, District Kabirdham, (C.G.) The Labour Court, 'Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / HIGH GOURTOF GHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) W.P. No. 2740 of 2009 Petitioner State of Chhattisgarh VERSUS Respondent Chandra Kumar and another Present: Shri Y.S. Thakur Dy. A.G counsel fo'r the' petitionars/State. Shri H.B. Agrawal. Sr. Advocate with Ms. Sareena Khan, counsel for the respondent. ORDER (22.1 1.201 1‘)“ The present petition has been filed by the State against'the impugned order dated 04.02.2008vide Annexure P-1 passed by Presiding Ofhcer, Labour Coult, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) in case, No.43ll.D./2007 (Ref) whereby a direction for reinstatement of Chandra Kumar—respondent No.1 on'the post of peon with full back wages was issued. 2. Learned counsel appearin for respondent submits that subsequent to filing of this petition, Chandra Kumar—respondent No.1 has already been regularized as peonon 29.08.2008. 3. On instructions, learned counsel for respondent submits that respondent will not have any claim for back wagesln future also. 4. in view of abpye. according to the counsel for the parties; nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 5. Thus, the petition is acoordinglydisposed ///// of. $a" Priya