1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Arbitration Petition No. 449 of 2006 TULSI JASHNANI .. Petitioner V/S SATCO SECURITIES FINANCIAL SERVICES AND ANR. ... Respondents Mr. Snehal Shah with Mr. Maniar i/b. VIRAJ MANIAR & ASSOCIATES for petitioner Mr. S. U. Kamdar with Mr. S. Purohit i/b. M/S PUROHIT AND CO for respondent no.1. M.s V. M. Daver i/b. V.K. Rambhadran for respondent no.2. CORAM: D.G. KARNIK J. DATE: February , 14, 2007 P.C.: 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the facts mentioned in this petition are identical to the facts in Arbitration Petition No. 448 of 2006. Hence for the reasons recorded in Arbitration Petition No. 448 of 2006 this petition is also dismissed. (D.G. KARNIK J.)