IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11353/2008 Decided on:23.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Jaram Singh. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. .…Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ansul Bansal, Addl. A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner is seeking regularization. He was engaged in the year 1994. He has continuously worked from 1994 onwards till 2004 and has completed 240 days in each calendar year. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization, if not already regularized, within 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 a period of two months, from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 23.12.2010 *awasthi*