(Spl.-H.C.A.S.,C.D.,78-e) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPELLATE SIDE MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 474 OF 2003 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 70 OF 2002 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Note, Office Memoranda of Quorum, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s Orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri V. Menezes, advocate for the applicants. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. DATE : 30th July, 2004 P.C.: Heard Mr. Menezes, learned counsel for the applicants. None appears for the respondents, though served. It appears that the delay of 45 months was caused due to the fact that the other applicant had not informed the present applicants that a reference at the instance of her deceased husband was pending in Court. The applicants have made this application on coming to know about the reference. Hence there is sufficient cause for condoning the delay in view of the uncontroverted allegation. Miscellaneous Civil Application for condonation of delay - 2 - is allowed. S.A. BOBDE, J. mc.