1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER 1. SB Civil Writ Petition No. 5623/2006 Chaitanya Sharma Vs UIT, Alwar & anr 2.SB Civil Writ Petition No. 4921/2004 Dharmendra Adlakha Vs UIT, Alwar & anr 3.SB Civil Writ Petition No. 4926/2004 Sunil Bijju Vs UIT, Alwar & anr 4.SB Civil Writ Petition No. 5856/2004 Atul Gupta Vs UIT, Alwar & anr 5.SB Civil Writ Petition No. 6428/2004 Ramavatar Vashistha Vs UIT, Alwar & anr 6.SB Civil Writ Petition No. 6447/2004 Jitendra @ Jeetu Vs UIT, Alwar & anr 7.SB Civil Writ Petition No. 7844/2004 Ghanshyam Baghi Vs UIT, Alwar & anr 8.SB Civil Writ Petition No. 3620/2005 Narendra Shamra Vs UIT, Alwar & anr 9.11.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Ashok Gaur Mr Rajendra Vaish - for petitioners Mr RK Mathur - for respondents BY THE COURT: The matter SBCWP No. 5623/2006 has come up for grant of interim order. 2 Since on same set of facts similar relief has been claimed, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, all the above writ petitions have heard together and are decided by this common order. The only controversy involved in these writ petitions is in regard to rejection of the candidature of petitioners for allotment of land in Patrakar colony by the Urban Improvement Trust, Alwar (for short 'the UIT'). According to petitioners they are in possession of required eligibility for allotment of land and the required material has been supplied to the UIT but the same was not considered. Learned counsel for UIT opposes the prayer aforesaid. It is stated that after examination of candidature, when petitioners were not found eligible, necessary orders were passed. Supply of material subsequently can be considered only by the competent authority if an order is passed by this court. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioners submits that during pendency of writ petitions some other candidates have been allotted plots and such facts have been brought on record by way of affidavit. It is further prayed that they may be given chance 3 to submit required documents and all other material showing eligibility of petitioners and also the subsequent action of the respondents. Aforesaid material may be considered after providing opportunity of hearing to petitioners. Prayer aforesaid has not been opposed by learned counsel for respondent-UIT. Accordingly, all the writ petitions are disposed of with the following directions - 1) All the petitioners would be at liberty to submit required eligibility material to the respondents within fifteen days from today. They would also be entitled to supply additional material and events which have taken place in the intervening period in the shape of representation to be submitted within the time given above. 2) Respondents would then consider the matter of all the petitioners afresh after providing opportunity of hearing to them before passing the order. If petitioners are found eligible then they may be accommodated by allotting plots subject to its availability. 4 3) In case of adverse order, it should be speaking one and be served on the petitioner(s) within reasonable time. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma