1 ara25-11 vai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.25 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.36 OF 2011 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.25 OF 2011 Vijay Singh Kadan ....Appellant V/s. DLF Home Developers Ltd. ....Respondent Mr.S.S. Patwardhan i/b Mr.S.S. Deshmukh for the Appellant. Mr.Aditya Chitale for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 19TH OCTOBER, 2011. P.C. :- 1. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, in whose favour the interim order has been passed by the arbitral tribunal, makes a statement that the proposed purchaser has backed out. He states that the respondent will not therefore, execute the interim order, as it has become infructuous. He further makes a statement that the respondent is now not interested in executing the interim order and shall not execute the same. This is in view of the fact that the final award is awaited from the arbitral tribunal. The statements 2 ara25-11 are accepted. The arbitration appeal is accordingly disposed of. Liberty to apply, if necessary. The civil application is also accordingly disposed of.