IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24105 of 2008 ------ SATRUGHAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.7.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barbigha P.S. Case No.288/2002 for the offences registered under sections 379, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code and rules 40(i), 40(vii) and 49(i) of the Bihar Minor Minerals Rules, 1972. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that during the search the petitioner was carrying the truck with the Challan given by the owner of the truck, which was later found to be not genuine. Be that as it may, the petitioner has no role to play in such transaction. Considering the submissions, as noticed above, and on perusal of the allegations made in the 2 F.I.R., it is directed that petitioner Satrughan Singh, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Barbigha P.S. Case No.288/2002 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistarate, Sheikhpura, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub- section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)