1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 502/2006 IN FAST ST. NO. 341/2006 _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office } Memoranda of Coram, } Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's } orders or directions } and Registrar's orders } ___________________________}___________________________________ Shri H.K. Mundhe, Advocate for petitioners. Shri Rishikesh Kulkarni h/f for Shri S.V. Kulkarni for respondent no.5 ........................... [CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J ] DATE : 02ND FEBRUARY, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Heard. 2 Heard. The delay of 143 days in preferring the appeal arising out of the Workmen’s compensation Act is sought to be condoned. Though the laxity is indicated, however it was not deliberate. The delay is sufficiently explained. Substantial rights of the appellants should not be squized for a 2 technical mistake. Consequently, the application to condone delay is allowed. [ K.U. CHANDIWAL, J ] tsk/ca502.06