1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.664 OF 2010 Rajabhau S/o.Manik Savane, Age-Major, Occu - C.No.6402, Aurangabad Central Prison, Aurangabad PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through, Divisional Commissioner Aurangabad, Division Aurangabad 2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Aurangabad RESPONDENTS Mr.M.D.Gitte, learned counsel for the petitioner (Appointed) Mr.N.R.Shaikh, learned A.P.P. for respondents. (CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, AND A.V.POTDAR, J.J.) DATE : 30/08/2010 ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per P.V.Hardas, J.) 1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2. A letter sent by the petitioner through jail came to be registered as Criminal Writ Petition. This Court accordingly appointed Mr.M.D. 2 Gitte to represent the petitioner in this petition before us. The limited grievance of the petitioner is that his application seeking his release on parole has not been decided by the respondents authorities though all formalities in respect thereof have been completed. Learned A.P.P. instructed on behalf of the respondents states that the aforesaid application of the petitioner would be decided within 2 weeks from today. According to the learned A.P.P., the delay has arisen on account of the fact that the medical certificate submitted by the petitioner was not legible. 3. We accept the aforesaid statement made by the learned A.P.P. on behalf of the respondents as an undertaking to the Court. We, accordingly, allow this petition on the statement made by the learned A.P.P. 4. Rule is thus made absolute on the aforesaid statement with no order as to costs. We quantify the fees payable to the learned counsel appointed on behalf of the petitioner at Rs.1,500/-. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) (P.V.HARDAS, J.) khs/AUGUST 2010/cri.w.p.664-10