IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1513 of 2009 KAMESHWAR TIWARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 22/12/2009 Heard both sides. Sentence is only pressed and on that point submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner’s conviction under Sections 341, 323, 324 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code are upheld by the Appellate Court but on the point of sentence, the petitioner has been found guilty for the offence under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code only, for which one year sentenced is awarded. According to the learned counsel, petitioner has remained in custody since 4.9.2009. Till today, differences in between the parties were for the land dispute, which is resolved now. The incident is of the year 1991. So, a liberal view according to the learned counsel needs be taken. I agree with the submission advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Revision application is partly allowed on the point of sentence by modifying and minimizing the sentence to the period undergone, confirming the conviction. The petitioner is directed to be released forthwith. Let this order be communicated to the court of Sri Ramesh Chandra Singh, 4th Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran Motihari in Cr. Appeal No. 94 of 1998/84 of 2004. S.Ali (Mandhata Singh, J.)