^ •"(? IKRi F ara? •Kps.e ffcK INVHE^HIOHGQURTQFJUDICATUREATBILASPUR CHHATTISGARH PETITIONEIR RESPONDEmTS /•r^. A^.;^^' <e^;jt^^- , y.'s^..^ ^^s^ ^"•27-li" ^^-.. '^ W.P.NO. 1 <T^^ /2006 : ^ RameshKumarSinha,Agedab6ut35years, S/o. Shi-i Sohanlal Suriia, R/o. ViUage ChikUli, Post Junwani (Charama.1, Distt' Dhamtari (CG) VERSUS 11 State of Chhattisgarh, . TBrough: Secretary, Tribal WeHare Deptt., D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2]. CoUector, Dantewada, District Dakshin Bastar,Dantewada • (GG) : : ' - - . ;,. Director, Panchavat and Gramin Vikas Vibhag, Chliattisgarh, Raipur, Districf Raipur (CG) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchavat, Bhairamgarh, District Dantewafla (CG) 51 Block Edueation Ofiicer, Janpad Palichayat, Bhairamgarh, District Dantewada(CG) . 6] Claef.Executive Officer, Zfla Panchayat, Dantewada, Distnct Dantewada{CG) . ' WjMT PETITIONUNDBRAKEtCa.S 226/237 OrTHB? CONStITU'ia:ONQKmD!& ? < ia :a ;»!•;!&; • • ®@ •B' $,: HIGH eOURT OF .roDlCATURB CHHATTI8GARH: BVLASVVR Sin^eBencli: Hon'bleSliriSaUshK.J^Uiotri.J. W.l*.»o.I037 QF20W Peti.ti.oaer : Raniesh Ktunar Siaha ^Versus . . ' •,•••••; • ' ::' j ' Resppndents : State of CUhattisgarh Ss ~ Otttcrs,'''/ '' ; 1" : ; • •' '1! - Shri Manoj paianjpe, counsd fiir the petilaoiier. StuiSuml ptwaiu, panel lawyer for the respondents. ORALORDER (24 MarcIi,2006) 1. This petition chatlenges fhe unpugned order dated 30.11.2005, (Annexure P-9), passed by fhe 'respondent Nb.5/ where^ ttie Qfficer Inchai^p of Prmiary School Kadtipara, Block Bhairamgarh, Bistnct ©smtewada,has been direeted fhat fhe order dated 20.10.2005, (Annexure P-5), passed. by fhe JaBpad F'anchayat, Bhairamgarh, appointing Shiksha Karmi, Grade-III, be not given effect to with.outpermissioriofDistrictConector.Dan.tewada. 2. Leamed counsel fiw' the petitioner subiiiuts that the pctitiQner was dn^ selficted and appointjed as Shiksha Karmi Orade-III, vide order dated 20.10.200S (Annexuiie P- 5), p^sed by the respondent No.6. Thereafter, the petitioner submittiedfUe joiningreportcm 5.13.2005, (Aiui'exure P-8). Learned cbuitsel U^ fiirfher submitted tliat thc petitiorier hadjouied fhedi.ttieson 5.12.2005, itseIE : 3. The petitioner was informed fhat the entire selecdon process appourtibg SIiilraha Karmi Grade-NI, h^ toeett cancened. ttisfurtB^contetided'fliatfhepeti^ BgS^^^gii ^^y-^ • SSiSffSi & e~- IBt .!&• $.: received aay written iaformation as yet about canGeUation ofthe selectioriproceedings,orhisappointment. 4. Learaed <»unselappearmg for the respondcnts Np.l, 2 aad 3, subnuts thatfhe petitioner has DeverjQined pursuaaf to his selection and appointinent as Shiksha Karmi, Grade-III, as the Armexiire P-8 is the appUcation inade by the petitipner to fhe Chief Executive Officer, Janpad panchayat, BhaiFamgarh, for his jomiag. Itwas further submitted fhat since the entire sclectk>n proceednigs have been quashed and new selection process has been iaitiated, the petitioner does uot havc any nght to the appoiutmcnt 5. Be that as it laay, leamed counsel for the petitioner sybmits that the petitioner has made a representati.Qn, (Aanexure P- 11) to the Secictaiy Scheduled Caste, Schedulcd Tribe and Backwapd Cl^ises, .Welfare Department, Govemmcnt - of Chhattisgarh, fhercfbre, fhe respondents m^r be directed to decide the said Fepresentatioii wifhin a stipulated penod. 6. Having heard learaed counsel for the parties, in the facts and circunistaaces pffhecase, fhe respondents are directed to consider and decide fhie represen.latiQn (Aiuicxure P-11), in acGordaactewith law, withinapenod ofthreeweeks.firo^ the date of ieceipt/pi®ductionofcopy pfthis OFder. 7. In view of foregoing, fhis petition staads disposcd of. No order as tocosts. ___—-——— c^" '0 Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge