THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.425 OF 2010 DT.30.04.2010 BETWEEN: Yerram Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy ………..petitioner Vs. Bondalapati Ammi Reddy …………….Respondents. O R D E R: The petitioner/defendant filed the present revision petition assailing the order, dated 13.11.2009 passed in I.A.No.850 of 2009 in O.S.No.43 of 2009 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Bapatla, wherein and whereby the application purported to have been filed by the petitioner under Order 26 Rule 10-A of C.P.C., and Section 45 of Indian Evidence Act, seeking to send the suit promissory note, vakalat and written statement of the defendant to the Handwriting Expert, A.P. Forensic Laboratory, Hyderabad for comparison of the signatures of the defendant was dismissed by the court below, taking into account the fact that the trial has not yet been commenced and any defendant who wants to take the defence of forgery would try to bring variation in his signatures. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the material placed before this Court, I am of the view that unless and until the petitioner adduces evidence, the question of adducing rebuttal evidence does not arise. I do not find any merit in the revision. The revision petition is, therefore, dismissed. No costs. ________________ B.PRAKASH RAO J., Dt.30.04.2010 tjs