HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR tt.M.P.NO, 187 OF 2011 APPUCANT RB8PONDBMTS VERSU8 1. 2. Mulcesh Jha S/o Rakesh Jha aged about 28 yeara, R/o Heerapur, Policc Statkin Aiaaaaka, Raipur, and TahsU & District Raipur (C.G.). Madhav Shaima, S/o Mmuialal Sharma aged about 50 yeais, R/o Rainkund, Vivekanand Asharam, Police Station Saraswati Nayas, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.), State of Chhatttegarii fhrough District Magisteate/CoUector, Baipur, District Raipur (C.G.). PETmON XJNDER ^CTIQX 482 OF THB CODB OF CRIMUNAL PROCEDUFRE. (SB :Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri Shivendu Pandya, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri U.K.S. Chandel. P.L. for the State/respondcnt No. 2. Respondent No. 1 not noticed. ORAL-C»DER (Passedon 04/04/2011) By this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Crimaial F'rocedure, 1973 (ia short 'the Code') petitioner has chaUenged flie legality aud propriety of(he order dated 2/2/2011 passed by 10fb Additioiial Sessions Judge, (F.T.C.) Raipur (C.G.) in crmunal revlsion No, 12/2011 affinamg thc order dated 3/12/ 10 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ralpur in crinuaal complaint case No. 687/07 wheieby trial Court bas refused fhe pray of petttioner for caUing Baak Aufhorily as a wituess. Oider unpugaed peruscd. In the Ught ofPara-4 oforder impugaed, I do not find aay ground for iiiterference ia fhe ordcr iiapugned ia exetcise of exteaordinary inherent jiirisdiction. However, consideru^ the argumcnt and claun of the petitioner, petitioner is at liberty to exanune Uiuself as defence witness to support his claun ia terms of Section 315 of the Code wifh fhis observation, petitlon u stands disposed of, I.A. No. 01 is disnussed sununarify. _^^—-' p. Sbarwa 3ud&e fj-