... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5278 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5278 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5278 OF 2005 Union of India & Anr. ...Applicants Vs. Moiz Tayebali Lokhandwala & Anr. ...Respondents Shri. H. V. Mehta for the Applicants. Mr. Pravin More i/by Mr. Uday Warunjikar for the Respondent No.1. Ms Rajshree Gadhvi, A.P.P. for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : AUGUST 23, 2005. DATE : AUGUST 23, 2005. DATE : AUGUST 23, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Applicant, Advocate for the Respondent No.1 and the learned A.P.P. for the Respondent No.2. My attention has been invited to the order dated 20th May, 2005. By the said order this Court directed that Application for‘ compounding’ made by the Respondent No.1 herein should be decided within a period of eight weeks. 2. By the present Application, the Applicant (Respondent No.1 in the Writ Petition) is seeking further extension of time to decide the Application. In view of the averments made in the Application, the same deserves to be granted. Hence, time fixed by the order dated 20th May, 2005 for deciding the Application for ‘compounding’ is extended by period of eight weeks from today. Application is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE