1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.3567 OF 2007 (DILIP VASANTRAO DHORE & ANR. Vs SAU.SUMITRA G. BANSODKAR & ANR.) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Mrs. B.P.Maldhure, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri V.M.Deshpande, Advocate for Respondents No.1 & 2. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : JUNE 02, 2008. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This petition is directed against the judgment of the learned Principal District Judge, Amravati, whereby the learned Judge set aside order granting injunction passed in favour of the petitioner in Civil Suit No.56/2006 before the learned Civil Judge Jr.Dn., Warud. When the petition was filed an interim relief was sought and was granted in favour of the petitioner. Thus, virtually the petitioners' possession has been protected. In view of this, it would be proper for the parties to have the hearing of the suit expedited rather than proceed with the writ 2 petition in which same question as to the entitlement of the parties to possession would be considered. Both the learned counsel agree that the petition can be disposed of by directing the learned trial Judge to dispose of the suit within three months after reopening of the Civil Court on 9th June, 2008. 3. Both the learned counsel agree that they will instruct their counter parts not to seek any adjournment before the trial Judge. If the defendants seek an adjournment the period granted to the trial Judge to decide the suit should be extended by the time for which the defendant seeks adjournment. However, if the plaintiffs seek adjournment. 4. The petition is disposed of accordingly. Interim order to continue till disposal of the suit. JUDGE RR.