HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3429 of 2007 PETinQNERS .i'S'. 1. Lachchu Ram Jain, Aged about 42 years, S/o. Shri Prem Lal Jain, Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Tahankapara, Charama, Kanker. 2. Smt. Shyam Bai Garvana, Aged about 42 years, W/o. Shri Sahdev Garvana, Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Kortara, Charama, Kanker 3. Ranu Ram Darro, Aged about 41 years, S/o. Ram Prasacf Darro, Assistant Teacher, primary School Bagdongri, Charama, Kanker 4. Kartik Ram Markam, Aged about 41 years, S/o. Shri Bidesingh Markam, Assistant Teacher, Primary Schooi, Kisanpuri, Charama, Kankar All are at Block Charama, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. The Director, Public Instruction, Raipur 3. District Education OfRcer, Kanker District Kanker (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Charama, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) 5. Treasury & Funds Department, Kanker ^, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SingleBench : Hon'bto Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Mr. D.N. Prajapati, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel lawyerforthe respondents/Stete. ORDER (Passed on 22M day ofJune, 2007) 1. The question pf law involved herein is asto whetherthe petttioners are entitled to regular payscalew.e.f. the dateofinjttalappointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appearing forthe petitioners as wellas for the respondents/State jointly submit that the tacts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the sameto thatof in W.P. / ! •' - "1 : ' : ~ ' (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), which was allowed vide orderdated 7.11.2006. . 3. ln view of the above-stated submissions made by teamed counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No orderas to costs. i——— Sd/- SatishK.Agnifaotri Judge Karuna