1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 3586/2007 Gopal Nagorao Telang and another vs. State of Maharashtra ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : A.P.LAVANDE, J DATE : 30.04.2008 Heard Mr. Deshpande, the learned counsel for the applicants and Mrs. Wandile, the learned A.P.P. for the respondent. By this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicants who are the accused in Sessions Trial No. 71/2007 challenge the order dated 22.10.2007 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon by which the application filed by the applicants for recall of six prosecution witnesses has been dismissed. The applicants who are the accused in Sessions Trial No. 71/2007 at the stage of leading defence evidence filed application for recalling six prosecution witnesses (P.W.1 to P.W.6) on the ground that certain contradictions and omissions were not put to the said witnesses. The learned trial court by impugned order has rejected the application which has been filed under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Having heard the learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. I find that no case is case made out for this court to interfere in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 482 2` of Cr.P.C.. The trial Court in paragraph 9 has observed that all the prosecution witnesses were thoroughly cross-examined by the accused. Moreover, the nature of the material contradictions and omissions have not been also mentioned. The trial Court has held that from the contents of the application what were the material contradictions and omissions could not be gathered. I find no infirmity in the impugned order. Hence, the application is dismissed. Interim order dated 31.1.2008 granted by this court stands vacated. The applicant shall appear before the trial Court on 3rd June, 2008 at 11.00 a.m.. The learned trial court shall proceed to deal with the matter in accordance with law. Judge patle 3`