THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 4142 OF 2009 Dated 8th July, 2010 Between: P.Shivaraj Sampathy …Petitioner And All India Council for Technical Education and Three others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : None appeared Counsel for respondent No.1 : None appeared Counsel for respondent No.2 : Sri M.Satyanarayana Goud For Sri K.Ramakanth Reddy Counsel for respondents 3 & 4 : Sri P.Sri Harsa Reddy For Sri S.Niranjan Reddy The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ and direct the 1st and 2nd respondents herein to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 5.2.2009 forthwith, and to take necessary action against 3rd and 4th respondents society under the provisions of the AICTE Act.” On 05.07.2010, no one appeared for the petitioner when the case was called. Therefore, the case was adjourned to be posted under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, when the case is posted under the said caption, no one appeared for the petitioner. Hence, it is reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing his cause in the writ petition. The writ petition is therefore dismissed in default. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition in default, WPMP No.5430 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 8th July, 2010 vrn