IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. APP (DB) No.340 of 2011 Rabindra Thakur, son of Madan Thakur, resident of Village- Nipyadeep, P.S. R.S. Camp, Jhanjharpur, District-Madhubani. …………Appellant. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Hari Kritan Thakur, son of Mishrilal Thakur. 3. Anil Thakur. 4. Vijay Thakur. 5. Prem Thakur. Sl. No. 3 to 5 are sons of Hari Kirtan Thakur Sl. No. 2 to 5 are resident of Village-Nipyadeep P.S. R.S. Camp, Jhanjharpur, District-Madhubani. ………Respondents. ----------- 2. 21. 04. 2011. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the State. The appellant is aggrieved against the judgment and order dated 25. 02. 2011 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. II, Madhubani in Sessions Trial No. 331 of 2009 (arising out of Pandaul (Sakri) P.S. Case No. 205 of 2008, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1980 of 2008) whereby respondent nos. 2 to 5 have been acquitted of the charges under Sections 363/34 and 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code for kidnapping of Rohit Kumar Thakur. A complaint was filed by the appellant which was referred to Police under Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C. for institution and investigation. The matter was investigated 2 and Police not only found the allegation false rather recommended for prosecution of the informant. But the case proceeded and charges were framed in trial and the trial court after considering the evidences came to the opinion that charges have not been established against the accused persons. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that deposition of the victim has not been discussed as he has supported the prosecution case. Learned trial court has given sound and good reasons for acquittal of the respondent nos. 2 to 5, so the judgment and order by which Opposite Party Nos. 2 to 5 were acquitted needs no interference by this Court. In the result the appeal is hereby dismissed in limine. m.p. ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) (Gopal Prasad, J.)