IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17738 of 2010 1. LAKSHMI KUMARI D/O SRI BISHNU RAI, W/O ASHOK KUMAR RAI R/O VILL.- SAIDPUR DUMRA, P.S.- PATEPUR, DISTT.- VAISHALI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COLLECTOR, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, VAISHALI 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PATEPUR, VAISHALI 5. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, PATEPUR, VAISHALI 6. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, PATEPUR, VAISHALI 7. MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, BALIGAON, PATEPUR, VAISHALI 8. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, BALIGAON, PATEPUR, VAISHALI 9. SUKH SUVIDHA COMMITTEE, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, BALIGAON, PATEPUR, VAISHALI ----------- 02. 16.5.2011 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State, it will be in the interest of things that the petitioner should first exhaust the remedy of moving the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority instead of rushing to the High Court straightaway. Writ is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty as above. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)