IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION IgfvyzL/9 6 /2001 j ilip Kumar Rajak S/o- Bhaiyalal Rajak, Aged— 38 yrs Senior Stenographer, M.P. Rajya Beej Evam Farm Vikas Nigam, Regional Ofiice, 9. Sundar Nagar, Raipur, (C.GI) PETITIONER : VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. ‘_ ISiate of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Deptt. Of Agiculture, D.K. Bhawan, Raipur, (CIGI) 2‘ State of MP. Through Secretary, Deptt. Of Agliculture, Ballabh Bhawan, Bhopal. 3 . Managing Directog M.P. State Seed and Fann Development Comoration, E—l/88 A Arera Colony ,Bhopal. 4. Regional Manager, Rajya Beej Evam Farm Vikas Nigam Regional Office r9. Sundal' Nagar. Raipur, (0G,) Writ under article 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India for issuance of a suitable writ, orders or direction. The above namedpetitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under :- x’ 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER :— As per the cause title. PARTICULARS OF THE SPONDENTS — As per the cause title PARTIPULARS ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE PETITION IS MADE = This petition 1s not made any specific order. By irtue 0f the writ petition the petitioner is prayin ’(D , V g mar. ma? Hfga .4;7;2002 arm W 2$k7é loul Wm‘ ma K. mwftww¥1t ém'neaua1w ‘ / l a Petitiower by Shri Alokv Bakshi Advocate . State by Shri Ranbir Singh, Govt. Advocate. Heard. In View of the limited nature oj'prayer made in tde petition which is ::‘or’ a direction t6 the oppesite party i.e. reepondent- no.3 to dispose of representation, copy whereof is Annexure P/ 8 to writ pe‘ritien, 110 useful *1)urpose will be served in keeping ’Lhe petition pending which is being disposed of ahthe admission stage. The gn'evance of fhe writ petitioner is that though he has submitted a representation to Respondent No.3, the same is not being considered. Accordingly, the Wiit petition is disposed of by directing the said _ espondent to dispose of the petitioner’s representation on its own merits 7ithin a pen‘od of four months from the date of communication of this I l rder. It is made clear that this Co rt is not expressing any opinion on 1‘ e merits and] or entitlement of th petitioner’s claim which has to be (:Fonsidered by the concerned au ority on its own merits and in . accordance with law. 7 i Sdl— P.C.Naik Certified copy as per rules. p Kid-1022