IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6968 of 2011 PAPPU YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 07.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is named in the FIR with allegation that he alongwith other accused persons committed murder of two persons by opening fire-arms. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no specific overt act has been attributed against the petitioner and a general and omnibus allegation of firing has been levelled against the petitioner as well as other accused persons. It is further pointed out by him that the I.O. has not properly investigated the case and the dead body of the deceased was found in another village which is not the place of occurrence as per prosecution case. Taking into consideration the above-said submission as well as facts and circumstances of the case, particularly, the allegation levelled against the petitioner as well as this aspect of the matter that the alleged occurrence took place in the year, 2005 and the petitioner could be arrested in the year, 2010, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Alauli P.S. Case No. 72 of 2005 stands rejected. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)