HIGHCQURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRTT PETITION f8) No. 5858 Manish Pandey. VERSUS . RESPONDENTS State ofChhattisgaA & Others. Aimt WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTnUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AsnflMrtri. J. Present: ShriPrateekSharma,Advocateforfhepetitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer farthe Stats/respondents. ORDER(ORALl (Passed on 1 lnl day of January, 2611) 1. Leamed coimsel appearing for Ihe petttioner submits fhat the grievance ofthe petitioner has already beea redressed. However, the respondent authorities are insisting upon recovery offte amouat of salary which has been paid to the petitioner by order ofthis Court passedonl 1.05.2009. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondent subnuts that the amount of salary already paid to tiie petitioner pursuant to the aforesaid order, passed by this Court, shall not be reeovered fi-om the petitlaner. 3. In view of the above submission, according to leamed eounsel appearingforthe petitioner, nofhing survives for adjudication. 4. Consequently, tfie writ petition is disposed of. ::Sd/-: Satish^