IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Review (T) No. 94 of 2008. Decided on: 28th October, 2010. Chaman Lal. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : None. For respondents No. 1 & 2. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. None for respondent No. 3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No. 3. Petitioner and respondent No. 3 have secured 20 marks each. However, the date of birth of Bhim Singh is 8.8.1959 and that of petitioner is 7.11.1966. Consequently, the person elder in age ought to have been offered appointment. In view of this, there is no error apparent on the face of record. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge October 28, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?