1 S.B.CR MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.4771/2006 Date : 02.11.2006 HON'BLE MR. SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK,J. Mr. M.K. Garg for the applicant. Mr. V.R. Mehta, Public Prosecutor for State. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that in this case only evidence against the accused applicant is statements of Pola Ram and Jagdish who are witnesses of extra judicial confession and statements of witnesses of recovery, therefore, at this stage he may be granted liberty to move regular bail application before the learned trial court after recording of statements of above named witnesses. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, while rejecting the bail application, it is ordered that learned trial court shall first record statements of witnesses who are in relation to extra judicial confession and recovery effected from the accused applicant. The learned trial court thereafter on moving any application for bail shall consider the same in accordance with law and shall also expedite the trial. The bail application stands dismissed as not pressed. vij (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J.