IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 1ST FEBRUARY 2010 / 12TH MAGHA 1931 CRP.No. 1024 of 2004 ------------------------------ O.P(ELE).NO.204/1995 DTD. 26/11/2003 OF II ADDL.DISTRICT COURT,ERNAKULAM. .................... REVISION PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ----------------------------------------------------- 1. PAUL VARGHESE, MANJUMMEKUDIYIL, KEERAMPARA, KOTHAMANGALAM, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER PROF.M.P.VARGHESE, MANJUMMEKUDIYIL, KEERAMPARA, KOTHAMANGALAM. *(DIED). (*THE SOLE PETITIONER IN THE C.R.P. DIED AND ADDL. PETITIONERS IMPLEADED). *ADDL.PETITIONERS 2 TO 5 IMPLEADED: 2. GRACY PAUL, AGED 43 YEARS, W/O. LATE PAUL VARGHESE, MANJUMMEKUDIYIL, KEERAMPARA, KOTHAMANGALAM. 3. SHERIN MARY PAUL, AGED 24 YEARS, D/O. LATE PAUL VARGHESE, MANJUMMEKUDIYIL, KEERAMPARA, KOTHAMANGALAM. 4. KICHU PAUL, AGED 22 YEARS, D/O. LATE PAUL VARGHESE, MANJUMMEKUDIYIL, KEERAMPARA, KOTHAMANGALAM. 5. M.P. VARGHESE, AGED 19 YEARS, S/O. LATE PAUL VARGHESE, MANJUMMEKUDIYIL, KEERAMPARA, KOTHAMANGALAM. *ADDL. PETITIONERS 2 TO 5 ARE IMPLEADED VIDE ORDER DTD. 06/01/2010 IN I.A. 2452/2009 IN C.R.P. NO.1024/04. BY ADVS. MR.A.V.THOMAS, MR.MATHEW B. KURIAN, MR.K.T.THOMAS, MR.V.M.KURIAN. C.R.P. NO.1024/2004: RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------- KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY MR.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC,KSEB. THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/02/2010, ALONG WITH C.R.P. NO.1227 OF 2004,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------------------------ C.R.P.Nos.1024 & 1227 of 2004 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of February, 2010 O R D E R In C.R.P.No.1024 of 2004, the revision petitioner, who was the claimant before the court below, has passed away. His legal representatives have been brought in as additional petitioners 3 to 5. When the revision petitions came up for hearing, counsel for the petitioners submitted that the revision petitions are not pressed. Recording the submission, Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. Sd/- (S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN) JUDGE SK/- //true copy//