1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD C.A. NO. 6349 OF 2010 IN FAST NO.4808 OF 2010 WITH C.A. NO.6351 OF 2010 IN FAST NO. 4925 OF 2010 WITH C.A. NO. 6350 OF 2010 IN FAST NO. 4808 OF 2010 WITH C.A. NO. 6352 OF 2010 IN FAST NO.4925 OF 2010 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : P.R. BORKAR.J. DATED : 07.05.2010 Heard Mr. T.S. Lodhe, A.G.P. for the applicant/State. 2. These are the applications for condonation of delay of 819 days in filing the first appeals against the judgment and awards passed in L.A.R. No.258/2004 decided by common judgment by Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmedpur on 24-08-2007. 2. It is stated that after decision, A.G.P. had made proposal to Law and Judiciary Department recommending filing of the appeals. Said proposals 2 were approved and Government Pleader's office, High Court, Bench at Aurangabad was informed by letter dated 01-01-2008 to file the appeals. However, A.G.P. had written a letter to the concerned authority for sending certified copies of the judgment and awards, different charts, typed copies of the judgment and awards and court fees. The court fees were received on 08-01-2010. It is not explained why exactly two years were required for providing court fees, when the Government had taken decision to file appeals. 3. Not being satisfied with the reasons, these applications are dismissed. This Court has perused the judgment of the trial Court to verify that it is not the exceptional case to protect the public interest. 4. In view of the dismissal of Civil Applications for delay condonation, civil applications for stay do not survive and hence, are disposed of as such. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] sut/MAY10/ca6349.10