WP(C) 1968/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE. B.D. AGARWAL The writ petitioner is challenging the notice dated 15.3.2011 issued by the Unit ed Bank of India, GS Road Branch, purportedly under Section 13(2) of Securitisat ion and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. Hear Ms P. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the petitioner and M r. S. Dutta, learned Standing counsel for the Bank. According to the petitioner, she has submitted a representation to the Bank to negotiate the liability. However, the Bank has not considered the representation. On the other hand, Mr. Dutta submitted that there was an outstan ding dues of Rs. more than 65,00,000/- and despite the notice, the borrower has not discharged his liability. Mr. Dutta further stated that this court directed the petitioner to at least deposit Rs. 20,00,000/- vide order dated 26.8.2011 bu t the writ petitioner has not deposited any amount so far. Needless to mention herein that the Bank is not bound to accept the offer of the writ petitioner. At the same time, the borrower has not challen ged the impugned notice. According to the learned counsel for the respondents, t he petitioner is the daughter of the borrower who has no locus standi to challen ge the notice. For none compliance of the High Court’s order and also in view o f the lapse of long period from the date of accrual of the debt, I am not inclin ed to keep the writ petition pending on one ground or other. In the result, the writ petition stands dismissed. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated.