^%;3-?"-^."i^3T: ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (T) No. PETITIONER : \ ./2008 ^v^x'y ^^ ..-•1J^^ ^y 'y^ ,^ RESPONDENTS .€ -^e^-^ ^^> ,GO^ -1^°' ^v ^ 4 S. S. Enterprises, A partnership Firm, through partner, Surendra Jayaswal, Aged about 45 years, S/o Late Shri G. P. Jaiswal, R/o High Court Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus- : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Commercial Tax, Mantralaya, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Chhattisgarh State Minor Forest Produce (Trading & Development) Co-operative Federation Ltd. Through its Managing Director, A-25, VIP Estate, near VIP Club, Khamardih, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Commissioner, Commercial Tax,Vanijyik Kar Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.). 4. Union of India, Through Secretary, Department of Commercial Tax, New Delhi. ,0' ^ ..^RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OF MANDAMUS, <y ^-^ cf ^J?OF- J^ ^^ PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC.OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION A7 ^ OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. l's-»£5€<^s> ^jjjjj, --'ssss^ ^n^r "^T R(^i<h WT 3^?T sti^ic») Go^ri »11*1CTI fl»*II^ ~5^ W4l<4l<r<<4, y>Tll'y<l<o, fs<dl<-<!j[< ^..^J^.l/.^......^200 ^TI^ST1(^^ (1^^<^) yRnw ^Rft?r 3iT^?r SB : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihot 1-10-2010 Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Shr Sharma, Shri B.D. Guru, Shri Par Tiwari, Shri Ajay Mishra, Shri Ha| Patet, Shri Ratan Pusty, Shri Dalpati, Shri P.K. Badhuri &Shri for the respective petitioners. Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, Depul State/respondents. Common order has been No.2060 of 2002 (M/s Shyam Biri| Chhattisgarh & Others) including th|i Signedand dated. On the request of learned) petitioners, the effect and operatj' M/s Shyam Biri Works Ltd. (s matters shalt not be given effect t^ from today. Certified copy as per judgment & order. Neelabh Dubey, Ms. Smiti jkaj Shrivastava, Shri V.R. 1-sh Wardhan, Shri Sanjay />|mrito Das, Shri Akhilesh |inup Majumdar, Advocates hr *ii*«A*^ f^*^1 <F»it$K ^^f^wa^r u- |y Advocate General for the p|assed & delivered in W.P. IWorks Ltd. v. The State of is petition. [counsel appearing for the jon of the order passed in i) and other connected for a period of four weeks su&ra rules along with main Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge •{{^4 ^i^ .^I^?T, ^^-:<pTk -' TS/147—2/2010-1,00,000.