:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7063 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 7063 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 7063 OF 2007 Aslam Sattar Chaudhari & Anr. ..Petitioners versus Anusaya Bhagwat Bharati & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Surel S. Shah for the Petitioners. Mr. G. N. Salunke for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. DATE : 17TH JANUARY, 2009. DATE : 17TH JANUARY, 2009. DATE : 17TH JANUARY, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This is a petition challenging the Order of the Executing Court refusing to record any satisfaction in the execution on the ground that no plea of fraud was set up before the passing of the decree nor has any application been made for setting aside decree on the ground of fraud. 3. In short, the Commissioner under the Workmen Compensation Act passed an Award against the petitioners. The petitioners appeared and contested :2: Award but without filing any written statement. After the Award was passed, in the course of execution, the petitioners applied for setting aside the execution for recording satisfaction in the execution on the ground that there was a settlement between the parties even before the decree was passed and in fact even before the complaint was made by the respondents. The Executing Court considered the objection to the tenability of such an application and rejected the same on the ground that it has no power to go behind the decree in the circumstances of the case. There is no error of law committed by the Executing Court particularly since the alleged agreement is said to have been entered into even before the complaint was made to the Commissioner by the respondents and yet it has not been produced in the proceedings. There is no merit in the writ petition, which is hereby dismissed. The observations made hereinabove are restricted to the present challenge made to the impugned order. (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.)