IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42395 of 2009 KAILA@ MOBARAK, SON OF LATE MD. MAKBOOL @ PAIRU, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BALIYAS, POLICE STATION DHORAIYA, DISTRICT-BANKA……..PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha No.1, Advocate. For the State : Mr. A.M.P. Mehta, A.P.P. --------- 2. 9.12.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 498-A, 326, 307/34, 304-B of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is the ‘Bhaisur’ of the deceased and they are living separately with the family of the deceased. Thus, it is not possible that he will make a demand of dowry, torture and kill her. Learned A.P.P. for the State submitted that the deceased herself is the informant, who had died subsequently and in the First Information Report she has made specific 2 allegation against this petitioner of burning her. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case and considering the fact that in the First Information Report the deceased, who herself is the informant, has made specific allegation against this petitioner for setting her at fire due to which she sustained burn injury and subsequently died, I am not inclined to grant bail to this petitioner. As a result, this application is dismissed P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)