IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION (1) NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3918 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.1237 OF 2006 AND (2) NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3922 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1240 OF 2006 AND (3) NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3923 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1238 OF 2006 The CIT, Bombay ..Appellant Versus M/s.Piem Hotels Ltd., ..Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.P.C.Tripathi with Mr.Dinesh Vyas for respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.REBELLO & Coram : F.I.REBELLO & Coram : F.I.REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE,JJ R.S.MOHITE,JJ R.S.MOHITE,JJ Date : 14.01.2008. PC 1. These are the 3 Notice of Motions for condonation of 375 days delay in filing of the main appeals. On perusal of the affidavit in support of the Motions, we find that the draft appeal memo was received on 06.10.2005 and appeal was filed on 18.7.2006. The delay caused during this period has not been properly explained. In the circumstances, cause shown is not sufficient cause. All the three Notice of Motions dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE,J) (F.I.REBELLO,J) (R.S.MOHITE,J) (F.I.REBELLO,J) (R.S.MOHITE,J) (F.I.REBELLO,J) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.1237 OF 2006 AND INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1240 OF 2006 AND INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1238 OF 2006 The CIT, Bombay ..Appellant Versus M/s.Piem Hotels Ltd., ..Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.P.C.Tripathi with Dinesh Vyas for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.REBELLO & Coram : F.I.REBELLO & Coram : F.I.REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE,JJ R.S.MOHITE,JJ R.S.MOHITE,JJ Date : 14.01.2008. PC 1. As the Notice of Motions dismissed, appeals also stand dismissed. Refund of court fees as per rules. Certified copy expedited. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)