IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22756 of 2011 Sanjay Chaudhary Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 7 14.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Perused the report kept at flag ‘X’ wherein it has been stated that only one official witness, i.e. doctor remains to be examined. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 328, 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. I have already rejected the prayer for bail considering the merit of the case of the petitioner on the earlier two occasions. No fresh ground could be set forth by the petitioner for grant of bail. Thus, the prayer for bail is again rejected. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. However, an affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Sr. Superintendent of Police, Patna that the concerned doctor would be present before the trial court on the next date fixed, i.e., 4.1.2012. Let him ensure this. The petitioner has remained in custody since 11.6.2008, thus, I deem it desirable that in 2 view of the report kept at flag ‘X’ and the aforementioned facts and circumstances the trial court would take every possible step for disposal of the concerned trial preferably within three months. If the trial is not concluded within three months, then, if so advised, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. Let a copy of this order be handed over to the learned counsel for the State. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)