IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23559 of 2009 GAUTAM KUMAR @ GAUTAM KUMAR SINGH son of LATE HARI SHANKAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF SARISTABAD, P.S. GARDANIBAGH, DISTRICT- PATNA Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3 04.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The offence alleged is under sections 304b/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the petitioner, who is the husband, has been implicated in this case without any valid justification. The allegation of killing the daughter of the informant is incorrect, as a matter of fact, the deceased while cooking got herself burnt. It is further submitted that the allegation of demand and torture is equally dismissed. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State, on perusal of the case diary, submits that in large number of paragraphs there was enough materials which have been collected against the petitioner during investigation, and as such, the petitioner is not entitled to be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail. His prayer is, accordingly, rejected. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)