m5 PETlTlONER Versus RE§PONQEQTS 1. The Election CommiSsioner, Sate Election Commission, Raipur (C.G.) The District Election Officer/Collector, District Biiaspur (C.G.) The Assistant Election Ofiicer, Tahsii - Gauraila, District Biiaspur (C.G.) The Returning Officer/ Tahsildar, Tahsii - Gauraila, District Bilaspur (C.G.) _ Bilaspur (C.G.) The Electorat Registration Officer, District The Bandobast Officer, District Biiaspur (C.G.) The Tahsildar, Tahsii Gauraii’a, District t Bilaspur (C.G.) S°9°N9’'0‘>9’!‘°~.. The Haika Patwari, Patwari Haika No. 24, Tahsii Gauraila, District Biiaspur (C.G.) The Assistant Electoral Registration Oflicer, Tahsil Gauraiia. District Biiaspur (C.G.) Present: Mr. F.S. Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Prashant Mishra, teamed Aden. AG. with Mri Parag Ko‘techa, learned P.L. for the State. ' if“ ORAL ORDER (Passed on 14 of December 2005) lt is the case of the petitioner that he is a permanent resident of Peeparkhunti village, Gauraila Tehsil, Bilaspur district; he owns agricultural land bearing Khasra Nos. 36,47,53 and 55 (New Noe.59,62, 81 and 37) area 0.30, 2.10. 0.70 and 0.20, total area of 3.30 acres and he is personally cultivating all those lands; his name was included in the ma ,gk voters list published in the year 1999. His complaint is that in the revised voters list published in the month ‘of October, 2005‘ his name is not included. Having noticed that fact, it is stated by the petitioner that he made an application / representation to respondent No.3 on 25.1 1 .2005 to include his name in the voters list, but, the third respondent has not yet included his name in the voters list. It is stated that the petitioner intends to contest the Mandi election for the year 2005-06 and, therefore, if there is any delay on the part of respondent No.3, it would result in great prejudice to the petitioner. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, l think that ends of justice would be met by directing the third respondent to consider and dispose of the application l representation of the petitioner dated 25.1 1 .2005, within a time frame. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent to consider and dispose of the application! representation of the petitioner dated 25.11.2005, if not already disposed of, within a period of 10 days from today: Learned Additional Advocate General shall communicate this‘order forthwith to the third respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. Sdl- chief Jusu'ce émtio w