1 4215.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4215 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.674 OF 2010 Bajaj Auto Limited ...Applicant Versus Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Karl Shroff with Mr.Mitesh Naik i/b Dhru & Co. for applicant. Mr.Sudhir Prabhu for respondent No.1. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATED:- FEBRUARY 25, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the applicant and the learned Counsel for the Corporation. 2. We are in agreement with the submission of the Counsel for the respondent/original appellant that the order dated 11th June, 2010 is passed on the basis of statement made by the Counsel for the applicant on instructions that the applicant would withdraw the amount on clear understanding that if the amount is required to be returned to the appellant, 2 4215.10 the same will be made over to the appellant along with the interest at not less than 12% per annum. The argument of the applicant that there is changed situation, for which, the rate of interest be reduced, does not commend to us. Accordingly, the Application is rejected. (A.A.SAYED, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)