HON’BLE SRI G.S. SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD WRIT PETITION No. 3164 OF 2006 Between: P. Janardhana Reddy ……Petitioner And State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary to Government, GAD (I&PR Dept), Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad-500 004 and six others ……Respondents :: ORDER :: Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri K. Rama Krishna Reddy, Senior Advocate, assisted by D.V. Sudheer Kumar Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : Special Government Pleader and Government Pleader for Municipal Administration Counsel for Respondent No.4 : Sri P. Venugopal Counsel for Respondent No.5 : Sri B. Adinarayana Rao Counsel for Respondent No.6 : Sri M. Rajamalla Reddy Dated: 26-04-2006 Per G.S. SINGHVI, CJ This is a petition for quashing G.O.Ms.No.357, General Administration (I & PR) Department, dated 14-06-1984 and G.O.Ms.No.107, dated 04-04-2003 issued by the State Government in the matter of transfer and alienation of land measuring Ac.1-20 guntas situated Shaikpet Village Road No.2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad to respondent Nos.4 to 6 and to struck down Rule 2 (b) and (10) of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Alienation of State Lands and Land Revenue Rules, 1975 (for short ‘the Rules’) as amended by G.O.Ms.No.12 dated 11-01-2002. At the commencement of hearing, learned Special Government Pleader produced before the Court G.O.Ms.No.191 dated 22-04-2006, vide which the State Government has directed Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad to take steps to stop the construction activity on the plots allotted to respondent Nos.4 to 6 with a further direction to the Collector, Hyderabad to resume the lands allotted to the private respondents. In view of the aforementioned development, the substantive prayer of the writ petitioner will be deemed to have become infructuous and the writ petition is liable to be disposed of as such. Ordered accordingly. While disposing of the writ petition in the manner indicated above, we deem it proper to make it clear that if the parties affected by G.O.Ms.No. 191 dated 22-04- 2006 institute any litigation, then the present petitioner shall be entitled to make appropriate application for grant of leave for his impleadment as party. He shall also be entitled to file fresh petition questioning the impugned rule, if he feels aggrieved by some other allotment made by the State Government. As a sequel to the disposal of the main petition, W.P.M.P No.10225 of 2006 filed by the petitioner to receive additional material papers is disposed of as infructuous. G.S.SINGHVI, CJ G.BHAVANI PRASAD,J 26-04-2006 ks/GRR