1 cri-wp-1597-11 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1597 OF 2011 Omkar Lallan Pandey .. Petitioner Vs. Mumbai Municipal Corporation and anr. .. Respondents Mr. SanjayHaritwal for petitioner. Ms. Seema Rawade for BMC. Mr. P.A. Pol, PP for State. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D.SALVI, JJ. July 05, 2011. P.C. We have perused the affidavit-in-reply filed by the Asstt. A & C. Roving (Vigilance) and it has been pointed out that the petitioner is not the owner of the vehicle or the goods seized in the said vehicle for payment of octroi. The petitioner claims to be a transporter. The affiant claims that the relevant documents, so as to determine octroi amount, have not yet been submitted and if such papers are submitted, the octroi amount will be 2 cri-wp-1597-11 calculated and on payment of the same, the seized vehicle will be released. It is for the petitioner to approach the Municipal Corporation with the concerned documents. No further directions are required to be issued and the petition is disposed off. (U.D.SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)