IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 7517of 2008. Decided on: 13.12.2010. Mr. Shyam Lal & ors. ……….Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. and others. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners. : Mr.D.P.Gupta vice Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mrs. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate. No. 1 to 3. Respondents No. 4 to 11 ex-parte. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) The case of the petitioners, in a nutshell, is that they have not been regularized, though they were seniors to the respondents. 2. The case of the respondents-board, precisely, is that there were no vacancies when the reply was filed and the persons junior to the petitioners have not been regularized. The reply was filed on 29.03.2001. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the respondents-board to consider the case of the petitioners, if not already taken, within a period of two weeks after the production of the certified copy of the judgment by the petitioners. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. 2 3. With these observations /directions, the petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) December 13, 2010. Judge (krt)