IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 44 OF 2006 Namrata Rajesh Mehta ... PETITIONER V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... RESPONDENT Mr. Rajiv Narulla with Mr. Chourasia i/b. A.M. Sarogi for the petitioner. Mr. R.J. Mane, AGP for respondent No.1. Mr. Rajiv Morey i/b. Kunona & Co. for Respondent No.3. Ms. T. Purohit for Respondent No.2. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 14th March, 2006 P.C. . Considering the earlier judgments of this Court in Writ Petition No. 1304 of 2004 which was decided on 23.07.2004 and the subsequent judgment in Writ Petition (L) No. 3310 of 2004 and another dated 14th December, 2004, we are of the opinion that this would not be fit case for this Court to exercise its extra-ordinary jurisdiction, in a case where petitioner, knowing the position of law has still put up a construction for whatsoever reason without consent or permission from the competent authority. 2. For the aforesaid reasons, petition is dismissed. [F.I. REBELLO,J.] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]