C.W.P NO. 2107 OF 2007 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P NO. 2107 OF 2007 DECIDED ON : 09.03.2009 Residents Welfare Association ...Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present : Mr. S. R. Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. D. Sharma, Senior DAG, Haryana. Mr. Dinesh Nagar, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 5. Mr. Surinder Saini, Advocate, for respondent No.7. SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) The petitioner-Association seeks a direction for closure of the commercial activities allegedly being operated from the residential houses in Sector-26, Panchkula. Notice of motion was issued and in response thereto, respondents No.2 and 5, as well as, respondent No.7 have filed their respective replies. C.W.P NO. 2107 OF 2007 -2- Having heard learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the fact that respondent No.7 has filed a civil suit for permanent injunction in which ad-interim injunction has been granted in his favour and the fact that there is a dispute between the HUDA authorities and PWD (B & R) Department, Government of Haryana, regarding the ownership of the land which is alleged to have been encroached upon by respondent No.7, in my considered opinion, the desired directions cannot be issued. However, it is equally imperative upon the respondent-authorities to identify the residential houses in which commercial activities are being run and take appropriate action against such unauthorized activities in accordance with the law and government Policy, if any, on the subject. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Copy of this order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. MARCH 09, 2009 (SURYA KANT) shalini JUDGE