{ 1 } S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9932/2008. GAUTAM CHAND VS. THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR. DATE OF ORDER : 12.01.2009. HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J. Mr. Rajesh Choudhary for the petitioner. To challenge the order dated 26.06.2008 passed by the Rajsthan State Co-operative Tribunal, Jaipur, this petition for writ is preferred. In brief, facts of the case are that the Managing Committee of the Balotra Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. by its resolution dated 28.11.2007 decided to re-employ Shri Surendra Nath as its Managing Director after his retirement for a term of two years. The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Barmer made a reference to the Rajasthan State Co-operative Tribunal as per the provisions of Section 125 of the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 to rescind the resolution above dated 28.11.2007. The petitioner – a Member of the Co-operative Society i.e. Balotra Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. submitted an application for becoming party to the reference application and that was allowed on 26.06.2008. After hearing counsel for the { 2 } present petitioner and for respondent Shri Surendra Nath, learned Tribunal rejected the objections raised by the Assistant Registrar to rescind the resolution dated 28.11.2007. While challenging the order dated 26.06.2008, the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the Tribunal failed to appreciate that petitioner Shri Surendra Nath was not possessing requisite qualification to hold the post of Managing Director, who is a Chief Executive of the Bank. As per Urban Co-operative Banks Employees Service Rules, 1987, the eligibility for appointment as Chief Executive is that the incumbent should have the qualification of graduation from a recognised University with seven years banking experience. Respondent Shri Surendra Nath is having a Bachelor's Degree in Arts, which he obtained in the year 1973 and also the requisite experience, as such, I do not find any illegality in his appointment as Chief Executive of the Bank. In view of whatever said above, I do not find any ground to interfere with the order passed by the learned Tribunal. The petition for writ, therefore, is dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. Anil/