IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 6TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 15TH BHADRA 1929 CRP.No. 2565 of 2001(I) ----------------------- REPORT NO.3/2001 IN OS.196/1977 of I ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, ERNAKULAM .................... REVN. PETITIONER: 3RD PLAINTIFF ------------------ MARKOSE ABRAHAM, KOCHUPARAT HOUSE, ERAVINELLUR, PUTHUPPALLY, KOTTAYAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.BIJU ABRAHAM RESPONDENTS – DEFTS.2, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 19, 21, 22 & FORMER RECEIVERS. -------------------- 1. KURIAN KORULA, KALAMBUKATTU VEETTIL, ERAVINELLUR KARA, PUTHUPPALLY VILLAGE. 2. IYPE @ MANI P.IYPE, PATTACHERIL, PHTHUPPALLY KARA, PUTHUPPALLY VILLAGE. 3. CHANDI VARGHESE, PATTACHERRY, PUTHUPPALLY KARA. 4. POTHAN KURIAKOSE, KAVUMKAL KIZHAKKETHIL KAROTTU, ERAVINELLOOR KARA, PUTHUPPALLY VILLAGE. 5. ABRAHAM VARGHESE, PUTHENVEETTIL, MUTTATHUTHARA, PUTHUPPALLY KARA. 6. MATHAI GEROGE, PANAMOOTTIL, PUTHUPPALLY KARA, KOTTAYAM. 7. VARGHESE JOY, KALAPURACKAL, PUTHUPPALLY, KOTTAYAM. 8. MOSES KURIAKOSE, VALIYA CHAKKALAYIL, PUTHUPPALLY KARA, KOTTAYAM. 9. MATHAI MATHEW, KUNNATHAYIL, PUTHUPPALLY KARA, KOTTAYAM. CRP.NO.2565/01 10. FR.E.K.GEORGE, ENGAZHAKKATTU PUTHENPURACKAL, VELLORKARA, PAMPADY VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM. 11. ALEXANDER K.J., ADVOCATE, KOTTAYAM-2. 12. THOMAS J., MAPALASSERY, ADVOCATE, KOTTAYAM-2. R11 & R12 BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K) SRI.BABY THOMAS THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:- ORDER ON CMP.5437/01 & 54/02 IN CRP.2565/01 DISMISSED 6.9.07 SD/- PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE /TRUE COPY/ PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. .......................................................... C.R.P.No.2565 OF 2001 ........................................................... DATED THIS THE 6TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 O R D E R Respondents 11 and 12 are already served and there is appearance for them. Service of notice on the other respondents, in my opinion, is not necessary. 2. Heard both sides. 3. Counsel for the petitioner seeks time. I am not inclined to grant time. I do not find any jurisdictional infirmity about the impugned order under which the District Judge found that considering the gravity and nature of the work done by the advocate-receivers who were Senior Members of the Kottayam Bar, a sum of Rs.25,000/- shall be paid to each of them in full and final settlement. The Civil Revision Petition will stand dismissed. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) tgl PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, J. .......................................... C.R.P.2565 OF 2001 ORDER 6TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 ..........................................