IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11986 of 1999 Between: 1 B.Madhugopal S/o. Late B.P. Appa Rao. R/o. 13-1-37/3, Saiprem Colony, Malakajgiri, Hyderabad. 2 Biren Debnath S/o. Late Subhas Debnath, Hindu, R/o. Hyderabad. 3 Sirajula Ahmed S/o. Md. Hussain, R/o. Hyderabad. 4 Abhijit Mitra S/o. S. Mithra, Hindu, R/o. Hyderabad. 5 Sukantha Mukherjee S/o. Basudev, Hindu R/o. Hyderabad. 6 Rajeshwari D/o. M.Laxminarayana, Hindu R/o. Hyderabad. 7 S.Shobna D/o.P.Sagadevan, Hindu. R/o. Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Secretary, Ministry of finance, Government of India, North Block, New Delhi. 2 The Secretary, Ministry of textiles, Government of India, New Delhi. 3 Central Cottage Industries Corporation of India Ltd., 94, Minerva Complex, S.D. Road, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or a direction of a Writ more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not regularizing the service of the petitioner in the 3rd Respondent corporation as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently to direct the respondent to regularize the service of the petitioners in the post in which the petitioners are working and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.B.AMARANATH REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.K.SRINIVASA MURTHY The Court made the following : ORDER: When the matter is taken up, none appears for the petitioners. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ___________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J Date: 05.02.2009 va