IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7982 of 2011 DHARMENDRA PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 248 of 1991 registered under Sections 467, 468, 406 and 420 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that certain money of Patliputra Central Co-operative Bank Ltd., were misappropriated Subsequently the money has already been returned and the informant is in not taking interest in pursuing the litigation which gets reflected from Annexure-4. Since the petitioner’s anticipatory bail application was earlier rejected by this court on that ground alone I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, in view of the fact that other similarly situated accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail and the informant side is not inclined to pursue the litigation, it is good ground for 2 grant of regular bail. Let the learned court below pass appropriated order considering the fact that other similarly situated persons have been granted anticipatory bail and money has already been paid in the Bank and try to dispose off the same preferably on the same day if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of six weeks from today. Let the order be faxed to the learned court bellow at the cost of the petitioner. With this observation, this application is disposed off. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)