IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1614 of 2007 (O&M) Date of decision: November 11, 2009. Bant Singh ...Petitioner(s) v. Puran Singh & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri Randhir Sharma, Advocate, for Shri H.S. Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Subhash Aggarwal, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): As per the averments made in this petition, respondent No.1 was restrained by this Court vide order dated 7.8.1992 from cutting the trees standing in the land in dispute and in spite of the aforesaid order, respondent No.1 cut the trees, for which he was held guilty by this Court vide judgment dated 17.11.2006 in CWP No.1141 of 2004. It is further the case of the petitioner that thereafter again respondent No.1 had cut the trees numbering about 70 on 30.10.2007 and has misappropriated the same. In reply to the show cause notice issued by this court, respondent No.1 has filed his affidavit stating therein that he has not cut any trees, as alleged. Keeping in view the allegations and counter-allegations levelled by the parties, district Judge, Ropar was directed to submit his report with regard to the question whether respondent No.1 has cut the safeda trees standing in the land in dispute, as alleged by the petitioner, after taking evidence from both the sides. In compliance of the aforesaid order, the District Judge, Ropar has submitted his report to the effect that convincing proof of cutting the trees by respondent No.1 was not virtually adduced. In view of the aforesaid report of the District Judge, Ropar, I am not inclined to proceed further in this petition. Rule discharged. November 11, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge