IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6529 of 2009 Date of Decision: November 11, 2009 Gourav Malhotra and others ...... Petitioners Versus Randhawa Service Station and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.Sanjay Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. **** Ajay Tewari, J. This revision petition has been filed against the order whereby a subsequent purchaser has been allowed to watch his interest as an assignee under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC but has been declined the relief of being impleaded as a defendant with the right to file an independent written statement. In my opinion the learned trial court has rightly invoked Order 22 Rule 10 CPC. Learned counsel is not in a position to dispute that his vendor had filed written statement. In the circumstances, finding no infirmity in the impugned order, this revision petition is dismissed. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE November 11, 2009 sunita