IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23438 of 2011 Dinesh Sah, son of Baijnath Sah Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 01.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 498(A), 323, 326, 307, 328/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act. Subsequently, Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added. Considering that there is direct allegation against the petitioner of having burnt his wife as per the dying declaring as also that all the private witnesses have already been examined, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The Trial Court is directed to send the names of the Doctor and the Investigating Officer fixing specific dates for their examination, to the Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga, along with a copy of this order and the Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga, is directed to ensure production of the witnesses on the date so fixed so that there is no further delay in conclusion of the trial. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)