AB 535/2011 BEFORE HON\BLE MR JUSTICE C R SARMA Heard Mr. HRA Choudury assisted by Ms. R Choudhury, learned counsels appearing f or the petitioner. Also heard Mr. BB Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. By this application under section 438 of the Cr.P.C the petitioner namely, Md. M aiful Alam @ Saiful Alam has prayed for pre-arrest bail in connection with Fakir agram Police Station Case No. 3 of 2011 under sections 366/34 of the Indian Pe nal Code.Perused the case diary. In the FIR, it has been alleged that the informant’s daughter has been missing w ith effect from 14.01.2011 and that the informant has the firm belief that her d aughter has been kept in confinement by the petitioner along with Sri Sahidul Al am. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, taking this court through paragraphs- 4 and 5 of the petition, submits that Sahidul Alam is the brother of the petitioner No. 1 and son of petitioner No.2 and that the said Sahidul Alam, who has been living separately from the petitioner was in love with the said mi ssing girl and that he had married her in the month of December, 2010 without th e consent of the petitioner. Having heard the learned counsel for both the parties and considering the materi als on record, I find no sufficient reasons requiring custodial interrogation of the petitioner. Accordingly, interim order dated 28.02.2011 is made absolute. Return the case diary. The anticipatory bail application is disposed of.