1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. REVIEW PETITION NO.2 OF 2009 IN APPEAL (LODG.) NO.779 OF 2008 IN COURT RECEIVER'S REPORT NO.234 OF 2008 WITH COURT RECEIVER'S REPORT NO.295 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.3091 OF 2001 Shaw Wallace & Co. Ltd. ..Petitioner. Vs. Junot Chagas Pereira & Others ..Respondents. .... Mr. V.R. Dhond i/b Bachubhai Munim & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. Basant Tilokani i/b Jhangiani Narulla & Associates for the Respondents. .... CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 1st April, 2009. P.C. : Counsel appearing for the Respondents submits that he has no objection if the Review Petition is allowed to the extent that the words “report submitted by the Architect Dr. Roshan Namavati” be substituted by the words “M/s.Parelkar and Dallas”. The Petition is 2 accordingly disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.