L.P.A.No.1407 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH L.P.A.No.1407 of 2009 Date of Decision : 18.12.2009 Mahinder Singh and others ...Appellants Versus Financial Commissioner Revenue, ...Respondents Punjab, Chandigarh and others CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. S.S.Brar, Advocate, for the appellants. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Challenge in the present appeal is to the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court on 12.11.2009, whereby the challenge to the mode of partition approved by the Revenue Authorities, was dismissed. The primary grievance of the appellants is that respondent Nos.5 to 7 have purchased specific khasra number, therefore, the said respondents cannot claim actual possession of any other land then what was purchased by them. The said argument has been considered by the learned Single Judge in extenso and it has been found that even if the sale by a co-sharer is of a specific khasra number, still it is a sale of a share of joint land. For L.P.A.No.1407 of 2009 2 the said purpose, reference was made to Three Judges' Bench of this Court in Bhartu Vs. Ram Sarup, 1981 PLJ 204 and Five Judges' Bench of this Court in Ram Chander Vs. Bhim Singh, 2008 (3) RCR (Civil) 685 (P&H). In view of the settled position of law in respect of the rights of a co-sharer on the basis of purchase of the joint land, we do not find any illegality in the order passed by the learned Single Judge, which may warrant interference in the present intra Court appeal. Dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 18.12.2009 (JORA SINGH) Vimal JUDGE