IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2471 OF 2006 IN APPEAL (LDG.) NO.485 OF 2006 IN L.A.REF.NO.5 OF 2000 IN CASE NO.LAQ/SR/535 The Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply Transport Undertaking ....Appellant V/s. The Special Land Acquisition Officer (2) Mumbai & Suburban District & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.U.J. Makhija i/b Little & Co. for the Appellant. Mr.C.M. Korde, Senior Advocate with Mr.V.B. Dhavan for Respondent No.2. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED : 4TH AUGUST, 2006. P.C. : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and Respondent No.2. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bona-fide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Place the Appeal on board for admission on 9.8.2006. (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)