Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27870 of 2011 (3) dt.16-11-2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27870 of 2011 ====================================================== Alakhdev Yadav, s/o- Musafir Yadav, r/o- village Sohda, ,P.S.- Rajauli, District- Nawadah. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nilesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL) 3 16-11-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the informant. This is the third attempt of the petitioner in seeking bail in this Court. Earlier his prayer for bail was considered and rejected by order dated 24.8.2011 (Annexure-1). Again the petitioner moved this Court for bail which was considered and disposed of on 1.9.2010 with an observation/direction that the Court below shall examine all the prosecution witnesses within 05 months from the date of receipt/communication of the order in the Court below failing which the petitioner was required to be set at liberty . Learned counsel for the informant states that within the time frame fixed by this Court, all prosecution witnesses were Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27870 of 2011 (3) dt.16-11-2011 2 examined and the prosecution case was closed. Relying on order dated 3.5.2011 passed by learned Trial Court in Sessions Trial No. 256 of 2008 on the bail petition filed by the petitioner, it is contended that it has been observed therein that the defence have adopted methods to delay disposal of the case which is otherwise pending for defence evidence. A status report was called for from the learned Trial Court which has been sent to and received which is available on record at Flag-A on perusal whereof it appears that the case is presently pending for production of defence witness on behalf of defence. Regard being had to the aforesaid facts, this Court is not inclined to admit the petitioner on bail. Prayer is accordingly rejected. The Trial Court shall expedite disposal of the matter. PANKAJ KUMAR/- (Kishore K. Mandal, J)