Civil Revision No.7533 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.7533 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.11.2010 Ved Bhatia and another ....Petitioners Versus Smt. Kamlesh and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. D.K. Bhatti, Advocate, for the petitioners. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Plaintiffs/petitioners have approached this Court challenging the orders passed by both the Courts below thereby rejecting the application of the plaintiffs/petitioners seeking ad interim injunction, restraining the defendants not to create third party interest in the suit property during the pendency of the suit. Both the Courts below have directed the defendants that in the event of execution of any sale deed, defendants shall mention in the sale deeds about the pendency of the present civil suit and also inform the name of the vendee to the Court. I think both the Courts below have protected the interest of the plaintiffs so that subsequent vendees cannot take any plea of bona fide purchaser. Moreover, settled principle of law is, if any third party interest is created during the pendency of the suit Civil Revision No.7533 of 2010 (O&M) -2- that would be hit by principle of lis pendens irrespective of the fact injunction application is rejected. In view of this, no further orders are required. Dismissed. (Alok Singh) Judge November 19, 2010 R.S.