SBCWP 1265/2008. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R Nemi Singh Versus The Judge, MACT Ajmer and ors. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1265/2008 Date of Order : 13/02/2008. PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Sanjay Gangwar for the petitioner. ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ petition has been filed against the order dated 22/11/2007 by which application of the petitioner who was non-claimant/owner of the erring vehicle before the M.A.C.T. has been rejected. By the said application, petitioner has applied for impleadment of the Punjab National Bank as party to the claim petition on the premise that it was the responsibility of the bank to get the vehicle insured but the bank having not discharged its obligation, the liability for payment of compensation cannot be fastened on the petitioner. In a claim petition filed before the M.A.C.T. at the instance of legal heirs of the injured, the requirement of law is that owner and the insurance company, if any, apart from driver should be impleaded as party but the financer of the erring vehicle need not be impleaded as party. SBCWP 1265/2008. 2 Moreover, in a claim petition which has been filed at the instance of the claimants in which petitioner owner cannot insist for impleadment of the financer. If the petitioner is aggrieved by inaction on the part of the bank in not getting the vehicle insured, he can seperately maintain a suit for recovery/damages against it. I do not find that the learned Tribunal has committed any error of law in rejecting application of the petitioner. The writ petition is dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil