ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO. 810 OF APPEAL NO. 810 OF APPEAL NO. 810 OF 2007 2007 2007 Khashaba Yashwant Chavan ...Appellant. Vs. Maruti Krishna Chavan & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.R.S.Kate for the Appellant. Mr.G.H.Keluskar for Respondent No.1C. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 24th June, 2008 : 24th June, 2008 : 24th June, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . This is a Second Appeal filed by the original Defendant as by the order dated 31/08/1988, the Trial Court has decreed the suit in favour of Respondent No.1- Original-plaintiff and thereby restrained to obstruct the peaceful possession over the suit land. The Lower Appellate Court also by an order dated 04/07/1998 dismissed the suit confirming the reasoning as well as the order passed by the trial Court. It means since the 19/06/1987 this order is in force. Both the Courts held that the plaintiff proved his title and is in possession over the suit property, and therefore, granted permanent injunction. The material placed on record, in the facts and circumstances of the case, therefore, sufficient to maintain the order passed by the Courts below apart from the fact that ( 2 ) though Second Appeal in question is filed in the year 1998 and listed after 10 years for admission during all these period there is no interim order or any order in favour of the Appellant. 2. In totality, therefore, the present Second Appeal is dismissed. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)