IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CR No.3376 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:20.05.2011 Davinder Kumar . . .Petitioner Versus Daulat Ram and others . . . Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Krishan Sehajpal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for some time to vacate the demised premises as he does not want to press the revision petition on merits. In view thereof, revision petition is dismissed on merits. However, he is granted time upto 7.1.2012 to vacate the demised premises subject to filing of an undertaking to the Rent Controller within a month from today and also clearing all the arrears of rent, if any due. The petitioner shall also keep on paying the rent of the ensuing months. It is made clear that in case of any violation of the undertaking, the petitioner shall be liable under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MAY 20, 2011 JUDGE Vivek