IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH * * * * * LPA No. 1187 of 2011 Date of decision : 19.7.2011 * * * * * Jaswant Rai ..........Appellant Versus Union of India and others ..........Respondents * * * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. Sanjeev Manrai, Advocate for the appellant. * * * * * 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? M.M KUMAR, J. Learned Single Judge has rightly concluded that the disputed question of fact with regard to the role of the appellant in foiling the robbery at Sutlej Gramin Bank, Head Office: A-4, Civil Lines, Bathinda would arise in this case. In the FIR, which is recorded at the instance of appellant himself, the version is entirely different than the one disclosed on the same day in the letter dated 10.2.2010 (Annexure P-2) addressed to the Chairman, H.O. Bathinda. Still further the story once again indicate change in the commendation certificate issued by the Senior Superintendent of Police. Therefore, we are in agreement with the finding recorded by the learned Single Judge with regard to the conclusion that disputed question of fact would arise and writ petition is not maintainable. We find no ground to admit the appeal and the same is hereby dismissed. ( M.M KUMAR ) JUDGE July 19, 2011 ( GURDEV SINGH ) ritu JUDGE