IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 9534 of 2008 Decided on: 14.12.2010 Rajeev Kumar and others …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioners : Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to the subsequent events. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge December 14, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?