1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 189 of 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant Versus Ramchandra Hari Joshi & Anr. ...Respondents Mrs. V.R.Bhosale, APP for Applicant. CORAM:- R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED:- 6th JULY, 2011. P.C. 1. The learned Sessions Judge trying Case No.27 of 1986 acquitted the original accused No.5 in respect of the charges under Section 466 and 468 of IPC. The original accused No.2 also came to be acquitted in respect of all the charges in which he was prosecuted. Learned APP Mrs. Bhosale, appearing on behalf of the State, submitted that in the impugned judgment dated 29th October, 2009, the learned Special Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court, Gr. Bombay has not discussed the evidence in proper manner so far as the original accused no.2 and 2 original accused no.5. 2. I have perused the said judgment. It is pertinent to note that the original accused nos.2 and 5 have been employees of the Government Department and that they are concerned with the relevant job for which other accused were prosecuted. 3. In my view, leave is required to be granted. Accordingly, leave is granted. Appeal stands admitted. Action under section 390 of Cr.P.C. be taken against respondents. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)