{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.248 OF 2008 Khushalrao Babarao Sakhre PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.D.E.Kudale h/f Mr.P.G.Rodge, Advocate for petitioner Mr.K.B.Chaudhari, Addl.G.P. for respondent No.1 ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE : 3rd July 2009 PER COURT: 1. Heard. It is stated in para 6 of the affidavit in reply that as per communication issued by respondent No.2 on 08.08.2008, third respondent issued a letter to the AGP which is annexed with affidavit at Exhibit-R-1. The letter at R-1, discloses that in writ petition No.3970/2008 directions were given to respondent respondent to take decision in respect of communication dated 10.04.2008 and as per the direction, the decision was taken on 08.08.2008, i.e. within stipulated period of 6 weeks and the decision was also communicated to the petitioner of {2} which copy is also annexed at R-1. After perusing contents of the affidavit in reply and communication at R-1, I do not find, prima facie, that there is any contempt at the hands of respondents. In the premise, contempt petition stands dismissed as devoid of any merits with no order as to costs. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/cp248-08