IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5206 of 2009 Kapildeo Chaudhary, S/o Late Bir Bahadur Chaudhary Resident of Village & P.O. –Malipokhar Bhinda,P.S. Shivhar, District-Shivhar ………………………..Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna. 2. Secretary, Ministry of Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna. 3. Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna. 4. Deputy Director, Consolidation, Muzaffarpur. 5. District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur. 6. Consolidation Officer, Bochahan, Muzaffarpur. 7. Land Acquisition Officer, Nalanda at Biharsharif. 8. Accountant General, Bihar, Patna …………..Respondents. ----------- 3. 04. 05. 09. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although he has taken time for filing supplementary affidavit but on the instruction of the petitioner, no supplementary affidavit is to be filed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Respondent No.3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievances as raised in the writ petition, petitioner proposes to file a detailed representation before Respondent No.3. In case such representation is filed within a period of four weeks along with certified copy of present order, the Respondent No.3 shall consider the same and dispose of the representation filed by the petitioner by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. Upon such consideration, in case representation is disposed - 2 - of in favour of the petitioner, the Respondent No. 3 shall simultaneously issue necessary order so that the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation in the light of order passed on his representation could be redressed without delay. With the above observations/directions, the writ application is disposed of. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)