IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23482 of 2009 PRIYESH KUMAR SON OF SADANAND SINGH. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3 13-11-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a police case under Sections 379 and other provisions of the Penal Code. The allegations are that the petitioner was one of the persons of the Financer seizing the vehicle. The informant alleges that all the instalments of the vehicle had been paid. Counsel for the petitioner urges that it is now beyond the pale of controversy that the vehicle had been taken on hire purchase . Learned counsel for the State is unable to point out any material from case diary and the nature of the investigation done by the Investigating Officer with regard to the vehicle being the subject matter of the hire purchase its hypothecation and repayment of the dues etc. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case the poor nature of investigation, let the petitioner above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10, 000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No.159 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. NKS/- ( Navin Sinha, J)