IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2603 of 2011 AMIRULLAH AND ORS. . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 02.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. That the petitioners may not have been charge- sheeted under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, when cognizance has been taken differing with the same. The mother-in-law having been enlarged on regular bail, this Court is not persuaded that the aforesaid is a sufficient ground to reconsider the prayer for anticipatory bail. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on their behalf has to be considered in light of the regular bail to co- accused without being prejudiced by the present order. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)