CRM No. M 34574 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 34574 of 2009 Date of decision: 02.05.2011 Lal Chand ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. N S Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioner Ms Gurveen H Singh, Addl. A G Punjab for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) In the present petition, learned counsel for the petitioner has made two folds prayer firstly, the petitioner is facing threats at the hands of private respondents to withdraw the statement made by the petitioner. Reply has been filed by the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the reply filed by the State in para 6, the petitioner is satisfied and therefore, does not press the said prayer at this stage. With respect to the second prayer, it is contended that the FIR was registered way back on 15.06.2009 but till date no final report has been submitted. CRM No. M 34574 of 2009 2 In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with direction to the Investigating Agency to complete the investigation and submit the final report as expeditiously as possible preferably within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 02.05.2011 mohan