IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.4151 of 1991 Date of Decision : July 28, 2011. Surinder Singh and others .....Petitioners versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.S.S.Siao, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Charu Tuli, Senior DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) In this Civil Writ Petition, the petitioners seek a mandamus to count the services rendered by them on adhoc basis for the purpose of fixation of their pay in the revised pay scales and accordingly grant them the senior scale/selection grade. The memo of parties reveals that the petitioners were at the relevant time working as Social Study Masters/Mistress, Vocational/JBT/ Punjabi/Hindi teachers etc. Vide order dated 18.3.1991, the writ petition was ordered to be listed for hearing alongwith CWP No.11708 of 1989. The records of CWP No.11708 of 1989 reveals that it pertained to the selection of the Executive Officers in the municipalities and, thus, has CWP No.4151 of 1991 [2] nothing to do with the issues raised in the present writ petition. CWP No.11708 of 1989 has already been dismissed by this Court. Since the relief prayed for by the petitioners is altogether different, the writ petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make their individual representations for counting of the adhoc service rendered by them towards qualifying service' etc. As and when such representations are made, their claim shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with the Rules, within a period of four months from the date of receiving such representations. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 28, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE