IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 18TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 29876 of 2011(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SANTHAMMA, AGED 59 YEARS, W/O.LATE. GANGADHARAN PILLAI, VADASSEY PUTHEN VEEDU, ENATHU MURI, ENATHU VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.ANIL KUMAR SRI.AJITH MURALI SRI.N.P.PRADEEP RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA, COLLECTORATE, PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 645. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ADOOR, ADOOR (P.O), PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT - 689 645. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, ADOOR, ADOOR (P.O), PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT - 689 645. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ENATHU VILLAGE OFFICE, ENATHU (P.O), PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT - 691526 5. THE AGRICULTURE OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, EZHAMKULAM, ENATHU (P.O), PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT - 691526 SR GP M.J.RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 29876 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P-1 A TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT NO.1803386 DATED 27.09.2011 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P-2 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 17.12.2003 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P-3 A TRUE COPY OF REPORT NO.433/03 DATED 20.12.2003 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P-4 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 26.09.2011 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P-5 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 03.10.2011 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P-6 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 03.10.2011 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. /true copy/ P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).29876/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 9th day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT The prayer sought in the writ petition is for a direction to the second respondent to consider Ext.P6 application made by the petitioner seeking permission for reclamation of a property. Taking note of the case of the petitioner regarding the pendency of the application, without expressing anything on the merits, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to pass orders on Ext.P6 application, as expeditiously as possible at any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs