IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1357 of 2011 Date of Decision: 24.5.2011 *** Rohtas Kumar .. Petitioner Vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. Manoj Kumar Sood, Advocate for the petitioner. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. By dint of impugned order dated 28.10.2010 the execution petition of the petitioner-decree holder has been dismissed, necessitating him to file the present revision petition. Heard. The petitioner claimed violation of judgment and decree dated 1.10.2007 by virtue of which the respondent-JD was restrained from interfering in the possession of the land allotted to the plaintiff in khasra No. 333, to which there was denial by the JDs. Both the parties led the their respective evidence and it was found that the proceedings against the decree holder were initiated for his having made encroachments upon khasra No.332 and they were given liberty to proceed against the decree holder by virtue of the aforesaid decree dated 1.10.2007 itself and the said action was challenged by the decree holder in a separate suit. Even nothing was shown by the decree holder to prove that the JD ever interfered with his possession over the land allotted in khasra No.333, the subject matter of decree dated 1.10.2007. No fault could be found with the approach adopted by the learned Court below while dismissing the execution of the decree holder. Dismissed. Dismissed. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE May 24, 2011 Jiten