(-1-) hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5464 OF 2006 Chandrakant Shankar Shekdar ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr.M.R. Phal for Petitioner. Mr. R.D. Rane, Government Pleader for R. Nos. 1 to 5. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & R.M. SAVANT,JJ. R.M. SAVANT,JJ. R.M. SAVANT,JJ. DATED: MARCH 30, 2007 DATED: MARCH 30, 2007 DATED: MARCH 30, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . It is the grievance of the Petitioner that the land belonging to them is under reservation right from the year 1962. The revised development plan was notified in the year 1987. The Petitioner caused notice to be served under Section 127 of the M.R.T.P. Act, in the year 1994. In other words, the period of 10 years has lapsed from the notification of the revised development plan. There is therefore, no question of deemed dereservation. Even otherwise, today respondents have taken steps to acquire the land. Considering the above, no case made our for interference. Petition disposed of. (R.M. SAVANT,J.) (R.M. SAVANT,J.) (R.M. SAVANT,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)