CWP No.6786 of 2008.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.6786 of 2008 Date of Decision: 19.07.2010 **** Narain Dass & Anr. . . . . Petitioners VS. UT Chandigarh & Ors. . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the petitioners None for respondent No.1 Ms. Geeta Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4 ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner seeks quashing of the notice dated 16.08.2007 (Annexure P21) and the consequential eviction order dated 13.02.2008 (Annexure P25) passed by respondents. (2). Suffice it to mention here that the petitioners being the highest bidder were allotted Bay Shop No.61 in the Modern Housing Complex, Manimajra, UT Chandigarh on a 99 years’ leasehold basis w.e.f. 1st June, 1990. As the CWP No.6786 of 2008.doc - 2 – petitioners failed to deposit the due instalments as per the schedule, they were served with a show cause notice and pursuant thereto the allotment was cancelled and consequential eviction order passed. (3). Aggrieved, the petitioners have approached this Court. (4). The respondents have filed their counter- reply/affidavit. During the course of hearing, the petitioners have deposited the entire dues and a statement to this effect has been made by learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents also does not dispute this fact. (5). In this view of the matter and as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed; the impugned show cause notice dated 16.08.2007 (Annexure P21) and the consequential order dated 13.02.2008 (Annexure P25) are hereby quashed. (6). Ordered accordingly. (7). Dasti . (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 19.07.2010 vishal shonkar CWP No.6786 of 2008.doc - 3 –