' ^, IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIiASPUR fCHHATnSGARH> SlNfi! WRTT PEnTION fSl N0. S32'0' OF 2006 PETmOMES ^,v, >' ^€>y^-^ ^-^%;-"""" ^y' ^2n" Padmatat Patanwar, Son of Late Shri Dataram Patanwar, aged about 49 years, Occupation- Service, Presently working as Patwari, Hatka N0. 24, Deotikhurd, Tahsil Bilaspur, District Bitaspur (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through ; ; The Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Deputy Secretary, , Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Ra(pur(C.G.). .^^^ '^^ G. c^s. 3. The Commissioner, (Land Records), Raipyr (C.G.). 4. ^ The Collector, Distrlct Bilaspur, ^ (C.G.). 5. Sagiruddin, Patwart, Revenue Qrcle Bettara, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.). ^^%®!^^^ ®HSs^i^^^^%^^l l^^r^~=fK^^-^?j^ri^?^^^^^^££^ WRTT PETmON UNDERARTICL^ 226/222LQ01!g XI-HC-78 *TTH(fT SSHiqi 3^T •^i^ici'4, ®Tnu'is,RiciKiy ^,.^p^...^3.%°^>$, 200 311^1 >4S)th (yt3'!<S.<T) -^ I^TqiTf^lNi gwsn^T shiii* TOtRTCflf^cT 311^1 irefcfy ChKatti 13-7-2006 Heard Shri Bhaskar'Payash| Shri Satish Gupta, Dep| respondents No.1 to 4, on advanc^ By the instant petition, the 30.6.2006 Annexure-P/1 wher Secretary, Government Sagimddin at Sr. No.26 has been ^ and the petitioner has not been traj Learned counsei for the p| petitioner may be aliovi/ed to mak; and he be directed to decide thl respondents No.1 to 4 has no objei Having heard iearned coun^ facts and circumstances of the ca the merit of the case, the pray| petitioner is just, fair and reasonab| make a detaited representation respondent No.2 within a periodl respondent No.2 is directed to within a period of 30 days from the objective manner, after considerini in accordance with !aw. However, iearned counse presently the petitioner is working Circle inspector, Biiaspur and in has been transferred whereas, +iiili-141-1 t<iicfTffte1^t'<Ri«it ^sri^tTan^T |, counsel for the petitioner. jjty Govt. Advocate for the State/ copy. ^etitioner is challenging the order dated under the orders of the Under ^ht^attisgarh, respondent No.5 namely (ransferreci at the place of the petitioner rajisferred anywhere. Nitioner submitted that, therefore, the :^ a representation to respondent No.2 k same to which learned counsei for fction. i^ei for the parties, having regard to the c^se, without expressing any opinion on ^r made by learned counsel for the |e, therefore, the petitioner is aiiowed to along with copy of this petition to of 10 days from today and in turn, (^ecide representation of the petitioner date of receipt of representation, in a," all fhe points raised by the petitioner, for the petitioner submitted that las Patwari in Hatka No.24 of Revenue (he petitioner's place respondent No.5 th^re are no orders regarding posting of P.T.O. x" Kn -^ 00