IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 684 OF 2008 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1286 OF 2008 IN L.C.SUIT NO.1274 OF 2008 Smt.Kalpana Satyadev Tripathi ....Appellants. Versus Municipal Corporation of Gr.Bombay ......Respondent Mr.Anil Singh i/by.Mr.D.R.Shah, adv.for appellant. Mrs.Geeta Joglekar, AGP for respondent no.1. Coram : Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J. Dated: 14 th July, 2008. P.C. : 1. This appeal is preferred against an order dated 5th July, 2008 passed by the Bombay City Civil and Sessions Court, Bombay rejecting an application for ad-interim injunction to protect four structures in respect of which the respondent-corporation has issued Notice under section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. Mr.Singh submits that, out of the four structures, the appellant has put up only three structures, one structure which is on the front side is enclosing the Otla. Admittedly, the appellant has not taken permission of Mumbai Municipal Corporation for carrying out the work of construction. In view of this admitted position, there cannot be any relief of injunction in favour of the appellant. Mr.Singh, then submits that the appellant proposes to make an application to Mumbai Municipal Corporation, for regularisation of the structures. If the applicant makes any such application, Mumbai Municipal Corporation will consider it on its merits. However, on that count there cannot be any order of injunction protecting the structures which are admittedly unauthorised. The appeal is dismissed in limine. (Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota)