c.s^ IN THE HIGH COURTOFGHHATnSGARH ATBILASPUR WRITPETITION Ji!ai[13 OF 2005 PETITIONER /: N. Manoharan, Son of late P K. Narayanan, aged about 62 Years R/oSreemangalam, Ramavarmajunction, Post: Avalukunnu'' South Aryad, Atapuzha, Kerala 688006. VERSUS RESPONDENTS b^ff^ r«^*A.^* \^%^ ^y^°' 1." TheAccountant General (A & E ) Pandri Naka, Pagariya Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 2. Stateof Chhattisgarh through the ChiefEngineer, Public Works Department, Near ColleGtorate, Bilaspur, District: Bitaspur (C G ) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE226/227 OFTHECONSTITUTION OF INDIA =DA^tu&"l'»*^rvf (•h<& PetiHnner* V XI-HC-22 sn^T^r tewan^T s»>tfi=t>CTf?(T I-.' 3^'SIWR^, (STfl'M'IS, RlCII'tfy /-2J «n*R'(Taiwh 3ii^i ^acft ^.M^.:.ll.?rA ^ ' 200i>" f^s. 3n^r?^nwHf?(T +i'iiFc)4l4tiiii-tTfffc'<') <Rtwi< ^i3ri^IT3f1^T No.2. as.s^wos ShriVmod Dcshmukl^, counsel for fhe petitioaer. Shri Althffl Agrawal, panel Lawyer for the State/respondcnt * I . I.A. No. 2155/200^ fi|>r m^enthearing is aUflwcd. Heaid. 1 TTie subtnission af te^rucd couasel for thc petitioiier is that fhc petitioner has retired o^» 31.3.2003 ftomthepost of Assistaat Grade-III in the ofl&ce ofChpef Engiacer Publie Worfcs Departmait He furfher submits that th<|)i^h soaie payment has been tssaSe on acconnt of G.P.P., but the fliH and final payinent has aet been made so fer and sonie outs^aadn^; amount is balanec for p^mcnt He also subinlts that ia^pita of several requests, the balaucc amount has not been paid t(? fhe petitioner. For fhe present, lean|icd counscl for fhe pedti.or»rnaalscs a Kmlted prayer that this peti-pon msy be disposed ofw a dircctfon to thc pctitioncr to file respoadent autfaorities may a detaited represeatation aad the also be directed to dispose of the same XI-HC-22 s^ srraicpT,^Tn^iii, Ridiyy 3)1^1 <45!Ch ^.......1.1^S>.. fWfTsfiWRK """'""'"""" W^ 209^~ sn^r^ir )?-ri% sii^T st'1 Bfi?T 'v- •^^ • (]';i: sunita in accoFdaD.ee with law wfthia fhc stipufated period grantcd by this Court. This limited prayer |is iiot opposed by fhe State counseL td. The prayer is aUowi Ifso advised, aloiigwifh the certified petttfon bcfore fhe month fiiom today aad coiapctent aathorily sbal law as earty as possiblc fl?oia fhe date of cfpy cointaetent ball receifet reasoned order on the sduae shaU be cotamuaicated tct Witfa ttie aforesaidl disposed of. Certified copy as p^sr rates. 'hl4fcl<fl-l Hwvfi ff fe'^l' <Rl+ril< ^iari^iTsn^i thei^itttioner vaay SSe a detaited representation of this ordcr and a copy of this writ authorily within a perk>d of one if such a repiesentation is filed, fhe dispose of fhe samc ia accoxdance with. preferabty witiun a period of 3 inonfhs of fhe rcpreseatatton, by passing a s^iae. The order passcd on repi'esentafcn fhe petltfoner. obscivations, tfac petitinn stmids fiaalfy sd/- SunU Kumar Sinha Judge (<fr^^^)