•^p^)ll5^^ BEFORS THE M.P.STATE ADMETISTSATF/E TSIBUNAL AT JABALPUR <~"~} . 1 N0.^-^>i<—'s/l995 . ' i APPLICANT ; Maliya w/0 Domer, Labour/Chowkidar o/o Bxecutive Engineer, W.R. Deptt Kawardha Divislon, Kawardha, Distt. Rsjnandgaon R/0 Ward Ho.19, Kawardha, Distt. Hajnandgaon. Versus RESFCKOEETS: 1. St'ate of M.F. through The Secretary, Water Resources Depertiient, Val 1 ab'h . Bh awan, ixafaate Bhopal• 2. Chief Engineer, Mahanadi Sodawari Kachhar Wster Resources Deparfmsnt, Reipur. 3. Superlntending Engineer, l'< ater Resources Department, Shji.^t-ia'th Mandla, Durg. 4. Executive Engineer, Water Resources Depertment, Kawardha Division, Kawardha, Dlstt. Rajnandgaon. sli;. AFFLICJ;TION UNDER SECTION 19 OF Ti'IE ADMIKIISTRATrVE TRIBUNM.S ACT, 193_5 nT'^ATT.s r,v' THH. a.EcT.T'-'ji'r'TnTi E?^' l^^'Li- KK'. K: BS? KS-- B"' BEi^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPLICANT WMT PETmON (S} No. 1 158 of2005 Maliva. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofM.P. & Others. APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OFTHE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT, 1985 SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnjhotri. J. Present: Shri Sanjay Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. SSiri Y.S.Tliakur, Dcputy Advocate General with Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 22M day ofOctober, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner subnrits that the petitioner may be peiTnitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation to the authorities to consider his case in accordance with the circular dated 05 March, 2008 as the petitioner was appointed in the year 1990 and his services were terminated on 03 September, 1995 (Annexure A/l). However, the termination order was stayed by this Court on 16th Febmary, 2000. 2. Shri Thakur, leamed Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State/respondents submits that in the event, a represeutation is made, the same shall be considered in accordance with law in its own merits, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the represeatation. 3. In view ofthe foregoing, without expressing any opinion on the merits ofthe case, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn wilfa the aforestated libertv and observations. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge