^^^ ...-^f^:^: ^^<\4\^A^ r '^^OT^_ ^JICjte B@n'eN; BEFORE THE HON'BLE H|GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P(S)No. ^3^ of 2011 PETITIONER Jageshwar Kumar Sihani.aged about 35 years, S/o Late Shri Amarnath Sihani, R/o Ravidas Chowk, Janjgir, District-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1. StateofChhattisgarh, Through : the Secretary, Departmentof Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) <—"""' 2. The Collector, Janjgir-Champa,District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTITUTION QFINDIA. 1. PARTIC U LARS OF ThlEJ3E'uTJOM I-> ^'^^ ^ t. ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH Al" BILA8PUR pE'rmoNER WRIT TjnON LS) No,43L4 _Qf2011 Jageshwar Kiimar Sihani. RESPONDENT8 VER8US State ofChhattisgarh & Ofhers. WR1T PETITION UNDER ARIICLE 226 OF TI1E CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SBLHon'bleSImSatishK.A&iuhotn.J, Present: Shri Gairtam KJietrapal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shi'i V.V,S»Moorthy, Deputy xA.dvocate General with Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel La,wyer for the'State/respondents. ORj)ER(iQRAL) (Passed on 12th day ofAugust, 2011) 1, Challetige m this petition is to the order dated 15.07.2011 (Amiexure P/l) whereby the petitioner, working as Patwari at Patwari Ha.Uca No. 43 and 46, Nawagarii, has been tra.sisfeiTed to Tahsil, Jaijaipur, on administrative grounds. 2, Shri .'Klietrapal, leamed coimsel appearmg for the petitioner subniits that iii fact, the pctitioner is posted at Janjgir Tahsil v^7hereas m the impugned transfer order, it has been mentioned as Nawagarh. Thus, it is ditllcult to execute the transfer order. 3. Shii Moorthy^ leamed Deputy Advocate General Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respoiidents submits fhat the place of posting sliown as Nawagarh is mcoiTect aiid the petitioner is posted at Patwari HaUca No. 43 aiid 46 ofJaiijgii' Tahsil. Shri Moortliy lurther submits that appropriate orders shall be passed within a period ofone week, 4, In view ofthe above, according to Shii Khetrapal, n.othing survives for a.djiidication m this petition. 5. Accordmgly, the writ pctition is disposed ofwith a direction to the respondent authorities that till necessary amended/coiTected order is issued, the order dated 15.07.2011 (Amiexiire P/l) m respect ofthe pctitioner shall not be given etTcct to, Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit