IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8701 of 2010 SADHU SHARAN PRASAD @ SADHU SHARAN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Amrit Abhijat, Mr. Ranvijay Singh. For the Informant : Mr. Pramod Kumar, Mr. Bimal Kumar Dutta. For the State : Mr. Umesh lal Verma. -- 3/ 30.04.2010 Heard. Informant appears more influencive that is why a simple case of Mar-Pit has been described for the offence under Section 307 of I.P.C. Weapons, if any, was used that is lathi and injuries are simple in nature. There is no ingredient of offence under Sections 384 and 386 of the I.P.C. Learned counsel for the informant persuading accused person to this Court to show his criminal antecedent but that never can make a bailable offence non-bailable. Not a single paisa is paid and under Sections 384 and 386 of the I.P.C. are added even without assertion of any demand. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Laheri P.S. Case No. 17 of 2010, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Nalanda at Biharsharif subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)