IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.512 OF 2006 WRIT PETITON NO.512 OF 2006 WRIT PETITON NO.512 OF 2006 Proprietor, G.N.Shah ..Petitioner. V/s. Smt.Sharda G.Bhosale ..Respondent. Mr.M.S.Topkar for petitioner. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED : 10TH APRIL, 2006. DATED : 10TH APRIL, 2006. DATED : 10TH APRIL, 2006. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused petition. No case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. The view taken is a reasonable and possible view in the facts and circumstances of the case. As a matter of fact, it was open for the petitioner to produce documentary evidence showing that no further business was done by them as sought to be contended before the Court below. Having not produced best evidence in possession of the petitioner, the order passed by the Court below can also be sustained by drawing an adverse inference against the petitioner. In the result, petition is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. ****