IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12343 of 2008 RAJESHWAR PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ' ----------- 2 17-11-2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. On behalf of petitioner it has been submitted that allegation and charge of embezzlement as mentioned in the impugned order of suspension dated 3-7-2008 is not made out because there is a written agreement between the concerned parties relating to execution of the scheme and no arbitration has been made to the District Magistrate by the concerned parties. The suspension order shows various charges and it is not possible to go into the merits of the case at this stage. The petitioner will be at liberty to raise his defence including the aforesaid contention before the enquiry officer. It is expected that if petitioner co-operates and appears before the enquiry officer, the enquiry shall be conducted expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months from the date of his appearance before the enquiry officer. With the aforesaid observation this writ petition is disposed of . It goes without saying that petitioner will be given his subsistence allowance as per law without any delay. (Shiva Kirti Singh,J)