IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1442 OF 2007 Dilip Tukaram Baldar (Kumawat) & Ors. .... ......Petitioners V/s State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..... ...... ...Respondents. Mr.A.S.Rao, Adv. For the petitioners. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP for the State. Mr.S.S.Sawant, Adv. For the respondent No.2. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 22/1/08 PC: The legality and propriety of an order directing issue of process passed by the trial Court is questioned by filing the present writ petition. As there exists an alternate efficacious remedy by way of revision I decline to entertain the present writ petition. Writ petition thus stands dispose of with liberty to file revision in Sessions Court. At this stage learned counsel for the petitioners submits that an interim relief is operating in favour of the petitioners and the same be continued for a period of six weeks. Said prayer is opposed by the learned counsel for respondents. However having regard to the fact that the petitioners would need some time to file revision and make appropriate prayer before the revisional court I extend ad-interim stay by a period of three weeks. 22.1.08