[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.98 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 845 OF 2006 Shankar Gangaram Shinde ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.V.V.Purwant advocate for applicant Mr.K.V.Saste A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 2, 2008 DATE : JULY 2, 2008 DATE : JULY 2, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. On 4.4.2008, statement was made by the wife of the applicant that applicant would like to engage another advocate. Mr.V.V.Purwant states that on 4.4.2008 itself, wife of the applicant took away the papers from him and also obtained his no objection on the Vakalatnama. Mr.V.V.Purwant states that he, as of today, has no instructions to appear in the matter and hence, he cannot go on with the matter. It is seen that no steps have been taken by the applicant since 4.4.2008. In this view of the matter, this application is dismissed for default. However, liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for bail if so desired. [-2-] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]