IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal I Bail Application No.592 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Sikandar S/o Rafiq R/o Choti Khedi Khurd, PS Laksar, Distt. Haridwar ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party ________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.60 of 2010, U/s 302/201/506/364 IPC, PS Bahadarabad, Distt. Haridwar Dated: June 21, 2010 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Adv. for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the FIR of the said incident was lodged after 34 days and the delay of lodging the FIR has not been explained by sufficient cause. Even the case rests upon the circumstantial evidence and the chain of the circumstances to connect the applicant with the said crime is not complete against him and only the last seen evidence against him has been collected by the I.O. After considering all the facts and circumstances, perusing the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Sikandar be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Haridwar. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 21.06.2010 Rajeev Dang