IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 8148 of 2010 Date of Decision: 15.12.2010 Krishna .... Petitioner Versus Kitab Singh and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. L.N. Verma, Advocate for the petitioner 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that earlier written statement was not filed by the defendant-petitioner, hence, there was no question of amending the written statement. He further states that instead of moving amendment application defendant- petitioner should have moved an application for rejecting the alleged written statement allegedly filed by defendant-petitioner and to file fresh written statement by the defendant. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that an appropriate application shall be moved in accordance with law before the Court below and with this liberty present petition can be dismissed as withdrawn. Present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to move an application as mentioned herein above, if C.R. No. 8148 of 2010 2 permissible under the law and on moving such an application it shall be decided by the Court below in accordance with law. (ALOK SINGH) 15.12.2010 JUDGE reena