IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17861 of 2009 SHYAM NANDAN SHARMA S/O LATE PARIKSHAN CHAUDHARY R/O VILL.- KUWARI, P.O. MAGHAUL, P.S. PAROO, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUZAFFARPUR, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, MUZAFFARPUR, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR 4. THE TREASURY OFFICER, MUZAFFARPUR, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR 5. THE BRANCH MANAGER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, KAMALPURA, PAROO, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR 6. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 2 18.12.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the respondent-Bank. The grievance of the petitioner is that the revised pension has been sanctioned by the Accountant General vide Annexure-2, copy of which was sent to the petitioner as per the memo no. 3122 dated 08.07.2008. It is submitted that although the authorization for payment has been sent to the Treasury Officer, Muzaffarpur for eventual payment to the petitioner through the Bank, the petitioner is not getting the revised pension. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the grievances, as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file representation before the respondent no.4. In this view of the matter, it is directed that in case such representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the grievances as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of two months on receipt of such representation so that the petitioner may get the revised pension as sanctioned by the Accountant General. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)