IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10990 of 2006 MD.SOHAIL AHMAD ANSARI, SON OF LATE GULAM RASOOL, RESIDENT OF ANAND BAZAR, DANAPUR CANTT., P.S.- DANAPUR, DISTRICT-PATNA. ……. PETITIONER Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, REGIONAL OFFICE, EMPLOYEES’ PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, SERPENTINE ROAD, R. BLOCK, PATNA, BIHAR. 2. THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (PENSION), REGIONAL OFFICE, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, SERPENTINE ROAD, R. BLOCK, PATNA, BIHAR. …………. RESPONDENTS ----------- 3 11.04.2011 Today again on call none appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to press the petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. On earlier occasion also none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner which is evident from order dated 08.04.2011. Sri S.K. Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of both the respondents submits that pension of the petitioner has rightly been fixed in accordance with the provisions contained in ‘Employees Pension Scheme’. The petition stands dismissed due to non- prosecution. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)