Crl. Misc No. M 15706 OF 2011 ****** Amit @ Illu vs State of Haryana Present : Mr. D.D.Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG Haryana ******* The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in case FIR No.1217, dated 24.11.2010, registered under Sections 186/307/353/398/401 of the IPC and Sections 25/54/59 of the Arms Act, at Police Station City Panipat, District Panipat. On 18.7.2011, the following contention was noticed :- “ Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner has now been in custody since 24.11.2010 and the allegations under Section 307 IPC are not made out against the petitioner.” Counsel for the respondent, on instructions from ASI Bishambar Singh, has not disputed the factual assertion but has argued that the petitioner has been involved in other cases also. Counsel for the petitioner has argued that what the police has done is that all the blind cases have been planted upon the petitioner. It is not disputed that the petitioner has never been convicted. In the circumstances, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner. Bail to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate, Panipat. However, in view of the apprehension voiced by counsel for the respondent, the trial Court is directed to take heavy surety. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) August 02, 2011. JUDGE `kk'