'rfj w $-29 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 786/2010 DALIP SINGH Petitioner ThroughCounsel(appearancenot given) versus Respondent Through Mr.A.Pathak, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI ORDER % 26.05.2011 CrI M A Nd.6434/2011 1. This is an applicationunder Section4 ofthe ProbationofOffenders Act r/w Sec. 360 Cr.P.C. 2. Issue notice. 3. Mr.Pathak,learned counselacceptsnoticeon behalfofthe CBI. 4. I have heardthe learnedcounselfor the CBI aswell as perusedthe report of the Probation Officer. 5. Keepingin view the reportfurnishedby the ProbationOfficer,I feel that it is a fit case for grant of probation. This because of the appellant convict is 65 years of age and is a first time offender. He, is accordingly,enlargedon probation for a period of one year on furnishinga personalbond in the sum of Rs.20,000/-with two sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. Ordered accordingly. Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified • ^1 6. The Probation Officer will supervise and submit the quarterly- report to the Court about the conduct of the convict. 7. It is made clear that during the. period of probation, the offender shall maintain peace and good behaviour and will not commit any further offence. 8. With these directions, the Revision Petition is disposed of. 9. Dasti. V.K. SHALI,J MAY 26, 2011 RN