IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH OCTOBER 2010 / 21ST ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 31275 of 2010(H) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. STEPHAN, S/O.VARKEY, AGED 55 YEARS, PULLAN HOUSE, CHERUKADU LANE, NETHAJI ROAD, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI 25. 2. MARY STEPHAN, W/O.STEPHAN, PULLAN HOUSE, CHERUKADU LANE, NETHAJI ROAD, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI 25. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR SMT.P.A.ANITHA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR. 680 001. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHALAKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 680 307. 3. RAJU, VADAKKANCHERY HOUSE, MANJAPRA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 683 581. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.K.B.RAMANAND THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.31275 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of October, 2010 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. The petitioners say that the Circle Inspector of Police, Chalakudy is threatening them at the instance of the third respondent. There is no scrap of material to show that the petitioners had complained about the acts attributed to the Circle Inspector by making appropriate complaint to the superior authorities of the Circle Inspector. We find that the petitioners have adequate efficacious remedy and this writ petition could not be entertained to add the already growing docket explosion of the High Court of Kerala. The writ petition is hence dismissed without prejudice to other remedies. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- P.BHAVADASAN, Judge. kkb.15/10.