IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1164 of 2010 SMT. NEELAM SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 14.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that the person and property of the husband of the petitioner and his family are being interfered by the respondent nos. 9 & 10, and as such, petitioner deserves to be protected. Learned Standing Counsel No. VI appearing for the State submits that there appears to be a civil dispute between the parties vide Title Suit No. 243 of 2008 pending in the Court of Sub-Judge, 2nd, Sitamarhi, as stated in paragraph 11 of the writ application. Considering the submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to interfere into the matter. However, it will be open for the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the concerned Superintendent of Police with regard to his grievance for protecting his life and property. The writ application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)