IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3687 of 2010 1. BINDESHWAR RAJAK S/O SRI DAROGI RAJAK R/O VILL.㳤 DEHULI, P.S.- SAKRA, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR, AT PRESENT POSTED AND WORKING AS HEAD CLERK, BUILDING DIVISION, P.W.D. MADHUBANI, DISTT.- MADHUBANI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SECRETARY, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DEPTT. P.W.D. NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA, BIHAR 3. ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF-CUM-SPECIAL SECRETARY null BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DEPTT. P.W.D., PATNA 4. CHIEF ENGINEER BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DEPTT. P.W.D. NORTH WING, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA, BIHAR 5. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION DIVISION, DARBHANGA CIRCLE, DARBHANGA 6. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DEPTT. BUILDING CIRCLE, DARBHANGA ----------- 2/ 17/09/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Faced with the predicament of challenge to an order of reversion after nearly six years, Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to pursue his representation with regard to the same. It is further submitted that Shri Harihar Paswan has retired and therefore any consideration of the case of the petitioner shall not be to the prejudice of Shri Harihar Paswan and therefore there was no need to implead him as a party respondent. That the Court may have declined to entertain the writ application on the grounds of delay does not inhibit the respondents in any manner from considering his representation in their wisdom, but only in - 2 - accordance with law. This Court expects such representation, if the respondents so wish, to be considered and disposed of within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/presentation of a such representation along with a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)