IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5792 of 2009(O&M) Date of Decision 25.02.2011 Mukesh Kumar and another ...... Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Ms.Amrinder Kaur, Advocate, for Mr.Sandeep Khunger, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Sukant Gupta, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondents-State. Mr.Ram Bilas Gupta, Advocate, for Mr.Ajay Kansal, Advocate, for respondent Nos.3 and 4. Mr.Jaswant Jain, Advocate, for respondent Nos.9 and 10. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J: Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 07.09.2009, passed by the Addl. District Judge, Fatehabad, declining the leave to lead the additional evidence to the petitioners. In order to provide material to the Court to enable it to reach the right conclusion and to impart complete justice, it would be expedient in the interest of justice that the documents i.e. certified copies of mutation No.3368 dated 17.12.1975, decree sheet dated 10.09.1981, mutation No.7003 dated 31.01.1994 alongwith copy of Will, order dated 26.05.1986 and copy of the writ petition pending in this Court, which cannot be forged at any stage of time, should be allowed to be produced and the delay in filing these documents could be compensated with costs. In these circumstances, this petition is accepted; impugned Civil Revision No.5792 of 2009 -2- order is set aside and the petitioners are allowed to tender these documents and conclude their evidence within three months positively subject to just exceptions and payment of Rs.5,000/- as costs which would be paid to Smt.Janaki and Smt.Mari Devi-respondent Nos.9 and 10. No further time for leading evidence would be granted. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 25.02.2011 mamta-II