IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24972 of 2010 1. RAMDAHIN YADAV SON OF LATE RAGHUNATH YADAV 2. JILAL YADAV SON OF LATE RAGHUNATH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.7.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 25(1-b)A/26 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted that the petitioner no.2 is Jilal Yadav and not Jital Yadav. By an order dated 2.2.2010 the petitioners were directed to be released on bail but a verification was to be done that the petitioners were not an accused in any other case of similar nature. However, in an enquiry it was found that the petitioners are an accused in a case u/ss.302/149 I.P.C. in which 27 of the Arms Act is also mentioned. Since that case does not pertain to possession of arms, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Aurangabad in Kasma P.S.case No.11 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) that the bailor shall also state - 2 - on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) that the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )