1 1. S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.829/2007. Dala Ram Vs. Pukhraj Date of Order : 28th March 2007. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI None present. .... In this appeal submitted on behalf of the claimant against the award dated 17.09.2005 seeking enhancement over the amount of compensation awarded by the Tribunal in the sum of Rs.50,000/- for the loss suffered by him due to the injuries sustained in accident including a fracture at right knee, nobody was present for the appellant on 21.02.2007; and again, nobody was present on 23.02.2007, and again, none appeared on 26.02.2007. On 27.02.2007 when nobody was present for the appellant again, it was considered appropriate to issue notice to the natural guardian of the appellant to present himself and to take proceedings in the appeal, if sought to be prosecuted further; and to explain the cause of regular absence. The notice sent in compliance of the order dated 27.02.2007 has been returned back unserved with the report that the addressee was not found at the given address. 2 Nobody is present for the appellant today either. In the circumstances of the case for neither the counsel for the appellant appearing nor his natural guardian being available at the address given, it is apparent that neither the appellant is interested in prosecuting nor the appeal can be proceeded further. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. Mohan/