^' IM THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. VffiIT PEHTION N0. l7S~9 OF 2001. PETITIONER w-^Shri Tek Ram Shrivss S/o Shri Arjun Lal Shrivas, aged about 30 years, R/o Nsvadih Sespat, Teh.sil Masturi, Distcict Bilaspur, (C.G.) "i^ VE B S US RESPONDENTS \A. 9- L..< A^I'^ .••'^.'•••"t''^.'^''." -^'^•^ • ,.<-^^>:' <fy"'' / 1. National Thermal Power Gorporation Limited, (.Gov.erriment of India Entergrise Through: The CS.neral ivlanager, project Seepat, Seepat, District Bilaspur, (C.G.). 2. The Deputy Manager, Project iieepat, Seepat, Di'strict Bilaspur, (C.G.). iiRrr^PbTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OE THE CONSUTUTION OF^ 1NDIA FOR ISSUE_AN APPROPRIATI viRIT IN THE NATURE OF XAN DAMUS /GER TIORARI_ ETC,_, QR DIRECUa'i/QRDEB ,IN THE ^ U KE KATURE ETC. . , XI-HC-22 'c~ an^w^i ^ll?b <>ft^l '^f-tiw ^lifl Subbu. s 'w iE^'*l<-(<li"f-tl,8Tilwre,I«K'iit<y W;P,.NO.i759/2001 %i^a'¥8!itR^ite 7-1-2002" Shri Rajesh Pandey, petltloner. Shri Prashant Mishr^, lesirned counsel for the respondsnts. Heard. . The matter relates between N-T.P.C. and the Shri Pandey subaits |bo dispute of boundary of land Ipetttioner. that it would be fair to In my view, whether) dispute of ownership over| In this view of th^ this Coart under Article; India. . The petition is actj;orclingly dismissed. ^f*t?7)<il;f^N<cif''^':;&^;tf;3l-^.i< i?3iFd*!3Ilfel learned counsel for the direct the revenue author|ities to look into the matter regarding boundary of lanjd in question. it is a boundary dispute or the entire land or a portion of the land, such a dispi.jte is ^lr^ferable to concerned revenue authority or Civ-ijl Court. matteir, I am not inclined to accept this petitipn in ^xercise of powers vested in 226/227 of the Constitution of Sd/- Chief Justice r^-^-::^c