1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 20. CA/13507/2010 (VITHAL HARISHCHANDRA PURI V/S PRESIDENT BEED OOS TOD KAMGAR AND OTHERS In WP/1732/2009 W -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. Vivek V.Bhavthankar, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.R.R.Suryawanshi, Adv., for R.Nos. 1 and 2. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:15/10/2010 1. Heard. 2. Mr. Suryawanshi, learned Counsel for respondent no.2 informs, the subject of challenge in the application - the advertisement dt.8.9.2010 itself is withdrawn by the Headmaster. Consequently, nothing survives in the application. 3. Second limb of submission is, the employment, if any, of the petitioner, was in primary section of the institution while the advertisement is of an altogether 2 different arrangement of secondary school at Kaij. 4. He also informs, at the time of entertaining the writ, the request for ad interim relief though was sought, the Court did not entertain it. 5. Considering the above position, the contention of the teacher that the post be kept un- occupied in the fact situation is difficult to digest. Consequently, the application is rejected. Both the parties should be conscious of the writ petition will be looming large. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/13507-10ca