THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO. CRL. PETITION No. 9087 of 2010. ORDER: Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor representing the State. This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the order dt. 20.8.2010 passed in Crl.M.P.No. 4324 of 2010 in C.C.No. 169 of 2010 on the file of the II Additional J.F.C.M. Tanuku. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that on 27.1.2007, the petitioner could be present before the trial court and consequently, NBW was issued against him and that petitioner filed Crl.M.P.No. 4324 of 2010 before the trial court seeking to recall NBW, without appearing before the trial court and that the said application was dismissed on 20.8.2010. NBW has been pending against the petitioner for the last nearly four years and the petitioner filed an application under Section 70(2) Cr.P.C. seeking to recall NBW even without appearing before the court. The ground on which the petitioner sought to recall NBW was that he came to know that the case was closed. He is said to be an employee. If really the petitioner came to know that the case was closed, he must have gone to the court and ascertained whether the case is closed or not. The conduct of the petitioner in filing an application to recall NBW nearly after four years goes to show that he is aware of the pendency of the case and also pendency of NBW against him. However, the petitioner has an alternative remedy to appear before the trial court and file an application under Section 70 (2) Cr.P.C. seeking to recall NBW and if that application is dismissed, he can file bail application. Without availing such remedies, filing a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. invoking the jurisdiction of this Court is nothing but abuse of process of law. The petition is not maintainable and the same is accordingly dismissed. _____________________ R.KANTHA RAO,J KRB. 13.09.2010. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO. CRL. PETITION No. 9087 of 2010. ORDER: DT. 13.09.2010.