%^l°? '^^. V- W THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH : BILASPUR Writ ftetition (S) No. 5634 of2007 Petitioner Vidyauaud CIioudhaiy, aged. 36 years, S/o Shri Nirmal Chand Choudhaiy, R/o village Kodatarai, Tahsil aud Qistrict Raigarh (Chbattisgarh) Versus Responctents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, tbrougtt the Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Developmeiit Departmeut, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chliattisgarh). 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Jaiipad Panchayat, Baramkela, Distnct - Raigarh (C.G.) WR FTn'ION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OPTHE CONSl'ITUTION OP INDIA (SB: Hou'ble SSari Satish K. AgnihotriJ.) Shri Saurabh Sharma, Advocate fer the petitioaer. Ms Smltha Ghai, Panel Lawyer for tfae respondent No. l/State. Q_R_D_EJ^ (Passed on this 4th day of March, 2009) 1. Wifh fbe consent of leamed counsel appeaimg tbr the parties, the matter is beard frnalty. 2. Learaed counsel appearmg for fbe responflent No.l/State fairly subinit tbat thie issue iavolved in fhis case asto whettier fhe petitioner, who is Shiksha Karmi, has been afforded aa opportunity of hearu^ before termination fmm. their post, came iato consideradon before this Court in the xnatter of Ku. Punam and othets v. State of Ctibattl^arh & others1. Leanied counsel further submits ttiat siace no notice was given betbre termination, the authorities shaU tato appropriate steps ia terms of the judgment axid order passed ia Ku. Punam (supra), before passiug any order. ! 366 I- 3 In view of the tbregomg, accordmg to learued. counsel appearii^ tbr the petitioner, notbiug survives in. ttais petition for adjudication. Havmg regard to the facts situation of the case and fhe judgment p^sed ia tlie matter of Ku. Punam (supra), the impugned terimnation oider dated 13.8.2007 (Aimexure P/ 1) is quashed. However, liberty is reserved to the respondent No.l/State to take appropriate steps ia accordaace with law aud the judgment aod order passed in Ku. Punam (suprs^. The petition is atlowed to fhe above extent. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K-Aguihotri Judge