IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH JANUARY 2010 / 23TH POUSHA 1931 RPFC.No. 71 of 2007() --------------------- MC.157/2005 of FAMILY COURT, KASARAGOD .................... REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT -------------------------------------------------- ABDUL JABBAR, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. LATE K.MOHAMMED KUNHI, RESIDING AT KALIKADAVU, MANIYAT VILLAGE, HOSDURG VILLAGE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS SRI.M.J.THARIAN SMT.PRIYA P.K. RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS -------------------------- 1. FATHIBI, AGED 30 YEARS, D/O. T.ABOOBACKER HAJI, HASEENA MANZIL, KOOLIYANGAL, KANGANGAD P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 2. ABDUL RAHIMAN, AGED 13 YEARS, S/O. FATHIBI, REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER 1ST RESPONDENT. 3. RAMSHID, AGED 11 YEARS, S/O. FATHIBI, REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER 1ST PETITIONER. 4. RAHANAS, AGED 8 YEARS, D/O. FATHIBI, REPRESENTED HER MOTHER 1ST PETITIONER. BY ADV.SRI.M.REMESH CHANDER THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J. ----------------------------------------- R.P.F.C.No.71 OF 2007 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th January, 2010 O R D E R This revision is preferred against the order of the Family Court, Kasaragod in M.C.157/2005. The wife and three minor children of the revision petitioner moved for maintenance and the court below granted maintenance @ 750/- for the first two children and Rs.500/- to the third children. The mother was disallowed in maintenance. It is against that decision the father has come up in revision. I had perused the order. It is seen that the father of the minor petitioners' is an autorickshaw driver and is an able body healthy man. The amount awarded for children aged 11 years and 8 years cannot be said to be higher at all. For the last child also the court has only granted nominal maintenance of Rs.500/-. It is all within the permissible parameters for mere subsistence. Therefore the revision lacks merits and hence dismissed. M.N.Krishnan, Judge cms