1S f-^ 1 r ^/^ro IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) N0. ^^3 /2006 PETITIONER .^^ 4r4)£-/ >-^^''_..;^'' .c<°* .' ~^' 6" ^-?C\cf>.v RESPONDENTS 1. Shailabh Kumar Sahu,-^ S/0. Shri S.P. Sahu, aged about 21 years, R/0. - C/0 Shri A.D.Diwan, Diwan Sadan, Bhagat Singh Chowk, Tikrapara Raipur, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd,, Through : Chief Managing Director, A, 601, Statesman House, Barakhambha Road, Delhi. 2. Chief General Manager,. B.S.N.L. Chhattisgarh Telecom Circle, Khamhardih, Vidhansabha Road, Raipur (C.G.) Pin : 492 007 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HI6H COURT OF JUOICA'njRE CHHATTIS^RH: BILASPUR Shoihbh Kumar Sahu Versus State of Chhattisgarh A others ShriPushpendra Patel, counse! for +he Shn V.V.S. Moorl+iy, Senior counsel counsel for •tiie respondents. rroner. with Smt. Anju Ahuy, 1. According tolearned counse! for the petitioner, the petitioner hos not been seiected for appointment on the post of Sraduate Engineer, Junior Telecom Officer-2005 2. The petitioner has fiied -this writ petition challenging the impugned O.B.C. Merit List prepared by the respondents, in which the name of •rfie petitioner has not been shovm despite the fact that the ioner has secured higher have secured tsss marks than the petitioner, whose names have been showrn in the O.B.C. Merit list. 2. Bein< the has filed representctions/cppecils dated 17.8. 5.8.2006 (Annexure P/7) before the Chief (Seneral Manager, L5.N.L. Chhat!'is9arh Telecom Circle, Raipur. The said r'epresentotions/appeals are still pending before the Chief ©enera! Manager, B.S.N.L. Chhaftisgarh TeSecom Circle, Raipur. Tlie petitjoner cannot pursue his grievances in two forums. When the ner has Subhash a forum by filing representations/appeals, which are already pending, this writ petitjon Es not maintainable. 3. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, ths Chief Senera! Manager, B.S.N.L. Chhattisgarh Telecom Circle, Raipur is directed to consider and decide pending representatiorss/appeals dated 17.8.2006 (Annexure P/6) and 5.8.2006 (Amexwe P/7), on its own merit, in accordance with law, witiiin a period of four weeks from the dste of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge