COt!RTOFPUNJABANDHARYANA AT ~ 11~ C.W.P.No. 949 of 1989 Date of decision: October 28,2006 Chaudhry Rice Mills, Himmatpura Road, Tohana v. The Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board and others Present: None for the parties. CORAM: Hontble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal t- ct: ::J 0U ::I: (!) -'- ::I: «Z ~ - oct:« ::I: ~ -,- La '« .,z::J c.. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers maybe allowed to see thejudgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether thejudgment should be reported in the Digest? Rajesh Bindal, J. (Oral) A perusal of order dated 19.7.1989 shows that the writ petition was admitted and was ordered to be heard with L.P.A. No.420 of 1987. As per office report, L.P.A. No.420 of 1987already stands decided on 27.11.1989. A perusal of order passed in C.W.P. No. 6562 of 1986- Mis Mahavir Dall and General Mills v. The State of Haryana and others, against which L.P.A. No. 420 of 1987 was filed, shows that the petitioners therein were relegated to the alternative remedy under the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961. For the reasons stated therein, the present petition is dismissed and the petitioner is relegated to the alternative remedy of appeal in terms of the judgment in C.W.P. No.6562 of 1986- Mis Mahavir Dall and General Mills v. State of Haryana and others, as affirmed in L.P.A. No.420 of 1987 -Mis Mahavir Dall and General Mills v. The State ofHaryana and others. 28.10.2006 mk I'"