IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 7TH JUNE 2011 / 17TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 15233 of 2011(D) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ SREENIVASAN @ DAVID, PANIVILAKATHU VEEDU, KARICHAL, MARAMANGALAM.P.O, KARUMKULAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHEER SRI.JELSON J.EDAMPADAM RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NEYYATTINKARA.PIN- 695 121 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANJIRAMKULAM.PIN- 695 095 3. C.K. VIJAYAN, NIRMALA HOUSE, KARICHAL, MARAMANGALAM.P.O, KARUMKULAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.PIN-695 165 4. HAREENDRAN, PANIVILAKATHU VEEDU, PULLUVILA, KARUMKULAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.PIN-695 165 R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K. VIPINDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- WPC No.15233 of 2011 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th June, 2011 JUDGMENT Basant, J. The petitioner has come to this Court with this petition for issue of directions under Article 226 of the Constitution to respondents 1 and 2 police officials to afford police protection for the petitioner against culpable, contumacious and violent acts on the part of respondents 3 and 4. 2. According to the petitioner, respondents 3 and 4 are his brothers. The petitioner had offered himself as a surety for an educational loan availed by the son of the third respondent. Respondent No.3 or his son are not repaying the amount. The bank is initiating proceedings against the petitioner. When the petitioner demanded the third respondent and his son to make payments, the third and fourth respondents are indulging in contumacious, culpable and violent acts against the petitioner. In these circumstances, the petitioner prays that directions may be issued to respondents 1 and 2. 3. The learned Government Pleader has taken notice wpc no.15233/2011 2 on behalf of respondents 1 and 2. The learned Government Pleader submits and we feel that it is unnecessary to order notice to respondents 3 and 4. If the petitioner has any complaint against respondents 3 and 4, the petitioner shall be at liberty to make those complaints before respondents 1 and 2, that is regarding the allegations of apprehended threat to the life and person of the petitioner and thereupon respondents 1 and 2 shall take necessary action in accordance with law to abate such threat to the life and person of the petitioner. We may hasten to observe that the dispute regarding payment of money will have to be sorted out by the parties by initiating appropriate proceedings in accordance with law before the civil court. 4. This petition is in these circumstances dismissed with the above observations. 5. Hand over copy to the learned Government Pleader and the learned counsel for the petitioner. sd/- R.BASANT JUDGE sd/- K.SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE css/ true copy P.S.TO JUDGE