IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8347 of 2007 BISHWANATH CHOUDHARY Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 3 5.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner alleges breach of an agreement or so called promise made on behalf of the respondent Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. with regard to setting up a Telephone Exchange in his premises. They have also suddenly withdrawn from the location and no payment of rent for the period January, 2006 to the current period has been made. Petitioner wants a writ of mandamus to be issued upon the respondents. Looking at the allegations made by the petitioner coupled with denial and the circumstances explained by the respondents and their stand on the issue, the Court is of the opinion that the dispute cannot be decided under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner has remedy under Civil law, if he is so advised. This writ application stands dismissed with the liberty above. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)