TS-i BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR(C.G.) ^g gg^ WRIT PETITION (0 N0. ~?f % C /2011 PETITIONER 1_ .^.)-?^'^ \f\°>yy'"...-< "y^c.^ '>'T"' -^ "'' ..'''' 1**' ^f" 3....-'" O.RE Radhye Shaym Mittal, S/o. Late Dhani Ram Mittal , Aged ^bout 36 " ^^:. years, R/o. Patthalgoarf^ Lailunga, District, Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2.NagarPanchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) 3. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) ScStB"" WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER RESPONDENTS HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 7180 OF 2011 Radhye Shaym Mittal Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others ^^ (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Saurabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Murthy, Dy. Advocate General for the State with Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State. Shri C.P. Shrivastava, Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, DistrictRaigarh.isalso present. ORDER (Passed on this 01st day of December, 2011) 1. Meard learned counsel for the parties. 2. At the very outset Shri Murthy, learned Dy. Advocate Generalappearing with ShriArun Sao, Govt. Advocate, on instructions by the ChiefMunicipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, who is present in the Court, submits that the impugned notice of demolition dated 25.11.2011, which without affording an opportunity of hearing, was issued for demolition of the alleged unauthorized construction, has been withdrawn by subsequent notiGe dated 26.11.2011 . A copy of the said notice'istaken on reccird. 3. In view of the above, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. However, the Nagar Panchayat will not take any action without affording proper opportunity of hearing to the person concerned. The Nagar Panchayat may also decide the question of authorized or unauthorized structure, as the same is in dispute, before passing the order, after considering the Gases of the pergons concerned. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok