IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 10th day of August, 2009 First Bail Application No. 725 of 2009 Criminal Side 1. Pinku @ Tinku, S/o Aman Kumar 2. Amit, S/o Rakam Singh All R/o Gunna, P.S. Kotwali Saharanpur District Saharanpur (U.P.) ……...Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand ……….Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 238 of 2009 Under Sections: 398, 401 I.P.C. P.S.: Ranipur District: Haridwar. _____________________________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J Heard Shri Manish Aroa, learned counsel for the applicants and B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. Applicants-Pinku alias Tinku and Amit, who are in jail in connection with case crime No. 238 of 2009, relating to offences punishable under Sections 398, 401 I.P.C. P.S.: Ranipur, District-Haridwar, have sought their release on bail. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that there is no public witness of the incident. It is further submitted that there is no criminal history of the applicants. This fact is not denied by learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the applicants further pointed out that co-accused Naveen and Sonu, with similar role, have already been directed to be released on bail, vide order dated 28.07.2009, passed by this Court. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicants deserve bail. Let the applicants- Pinku alias Tinku and Amit, be released on bail on executing personal bond by each one of them and furnishing two sureties, for each one of them, each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. Dt. 10.08.2009 (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) S 2