0^-^^ IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.t W.P.(SiNO. ^^^^ 2010 PETITIONERS ^ ^ 1. Gajendra Shrivastava S/ o Late Shri B.L. Shrivastava aged about 39 years, Post- Head Master Primary School Bhaishbandha, Address- Dalpat Sagar ward, Chitrakote Road, Jagdalpur (C.G.) / 2. Anil Prasad Gupta, S/o Jagmohan Prasad Gupta, Aged about 41 years, Posf- Head Master Priniary School Shuribhata, Address- Shantinagar ward, Jagdalpur. (C.G.) -3. Neeraj Das, S/o Shri P.L. Das, Aged about 39 years, Post- Headmaster Primary School Turenar, Address- Lalbagh, Jagdalpur. (C.G.) 4. Chandrashekhar Yadav, S/o Shri Devnarayan Singh Yadav, aged about 40 years, Post- Headmaster Primary School Podshagudha, Address- Mohan Nagar Kumarpara Plat No. 61, Jagdalpur (C.G.) -5. Asim Kumar Singh S/o Shri Bhansingh, Aged about 40 years, Post- HeadmSster Primary School Lohrapara, Address- Mother ....^'~"\ ^- \t! 8. Teresa ward, Near Danteswari College Jagdalpur. (C.G.) Laxmi Nath Goyal S/o Shri Raghu Ram Goyal, aged about 40 years, Post- Head Master Primary School Karnpur, Address- Village - Upanpal, Jagdalpur. (C.G.) Virendra Kumar Dhruw, S/o Shri A.R. Dhmw, Aged about 38 years, Post- Head Master Primary School Bhedhagudha, Address- Village - Bilori Post- Kurandi, Jagdalpur. (C.G.) Smt. Saida Khan w/o Shri M.I. khan, aged about 37 years, Post- Head Master Primary School Pnaragudha, Address- Mahavir Residency, Jagdalpur. (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: WRIT PETITON 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - Secretary Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department Distt. Bastar Jagdalpur (C.G.) UNDER ARTICLE ^26 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA :- ~F ^ •:^ ^" v XI-HC—78- ^StWT^W%' ^^ -^r^r^r, ^til^4!^ f^rray ..u.-...e.:..^..M.:.....^V^ •^lo 3T(^?T 17^T (^f^^T) ^n^Y^nf^w ?[^T ^IT^T^THt^ ¥^H^Rirft^ ^TI^? SB : HON'BLB MR. JU8TICB PRIlTIHKER DIWAK.BR 29.10.20a0 Shn Somkant Verma, couns Shri Vivek Sharma, P.L, for }el for the petitio.ner's, pie State. Counsel for the petitionersj are enti.tl.ed to benefit of two advajace they havixig passed B,T.I. examixi4 at fh.eir own cost,. It is.subixiitted present petition i.s 110 loxiger res ii fmaHy decided by, the Hon'ble S^ Aslia San.esia ¥s* State of M.P. S9. It is further subniitted tlial similar view in its order dated 6.1 6257/2008. Counsel for the petitit order dated 29.4.2010 passed i4 wherein relyiiig ixpon the judgme4t case ofAsha Saxeaa (supra) and m^anotlier Writ Appeal No. 87{ issued for consideratio3i of tlie m.crem.ents as per circul.ar dafed of Madhya Prad.esh, aft^r veii&catpon. petition, Counsel for the State subnil would also be considered on the ^T2?h?N^f ^w^l ^ feT^t <M^K "^^ffw^T^T subro.i.ts liiat th.,e petition.ers .iiicTeinents on account of ition before theii* appointment tthat the issue invo"h?ed io, the itegra aiid th-e ssum.e ha.s beesi |iipreiiie Coiirt m. tiie case of |& 0?s. 2009. (EE2JMPJR (®C| fh.is Court has also tal<:en a ,t2.2009 passed iii W.P.(S) No. bners fiirther subiaits that the Writ Appeal N0. 124/2009, of the vSuprem,.e C/ourt m. the l:he order passed by this Court '2009, directions have' been for grant of two advance 121.9.1974 isszied by the State jion ofth.e facts plead.ed ia fhe dase al.ts that ca.se of tlie petitioners s^m.e Im.es. ^ ~^ XI-HC—78 ^^ ^ITO^I^ ^^1<H4!^ [^KrlS^y 'NW^fT^W^ 37?^T ^5W (lici?d<Ei^) ^I^T^TfN^ ^m^T^T^^N^ 1^fT^T^cT3^l pe^iti authoiities I:a view of above, tlie direction to the respondent pe'titio.uers for graiit of two advai^ dated 21.9.1974 issued by fhe verifica.tion ofthe facts pleaded m.| four xuonfhs frora today, It is xnade clear that fhis opinion on meiits of the case would be at Mberty to decide th^ with law. pourt has not expressed aiiy tod tlie aufhorit^ concemed sarae stiictly m accordaiice '^F?f^R^ "RFT^f ^* 'fe^ft T^R$K '^3tfiR317^r ition is disposed of with a to decide the claim of the ce incre'siients as per circiilaT ^ate of Madhya Pi'edesh after Ihe petitioii witto.m. a period of Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge