C.R. No. 39 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 39 of 2010 Date of Decision: 23.09.2010 Resham Singh .... Petitioner Versus Amrik Singh and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Mandeep S. Sachdev, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Harsh Bunger, Advocate for respondent No. 1 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition is filed challenging order dated 6.8.2009 passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Jalandhar as well as order dated 13.11.2009 passed by Addl. District Judge, Jalandhar whereby both the Courts below have allowed ad interim injunction application moved by the plaintiff directing/restraining the defendants from interfering into the peaceful possession of the plaintiff over the land in dispute till the final disposal of the case. Both the learned counsel for the parties fairly stated that present petition be disposed of with consent in the following terms:- (i) Parties shall maintain status quo qua the possession and nature of the property in dispute during the pendency of the case. C.R. No. 39 of 2010 2 (ii) Learned trial Court shall decide all the questions involved in the suit including the question of possession. (iii) None of the party in the garb of status quo order shall dispossess the other party. (iv) Learned trial Court shall not influence by any observation made herein. (v) Learned trial Court shall decide the suit at its own merits as early as possible preferably within one year from the date certified copy of this order is placed before the trial Court. Petition stands disposed of with the consent of learned counsel for the parties in the above terms. (ALOK SINGH) 23.09.2010 JUDGE reena