IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-19442 of 2008 (O & M) Date of Decision: March 29, 2010 Balwant Singh & Others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Another .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Gurminder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent No.1. Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate, for respondent No.2. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) Crl. Misc. No.54477 of 2009 This Court while considering the equitable part of the matter, vide Order dated 3.8.2009 while dealing with the petition for quashing of FIR, granted bail to petitioner No.4, Karanjit Singh. During the course of proceedings, an apprehension was shown on behalf of the Crl. Misc. No. M-19442 of 2008 [2] complainant that petitioner No.4 shall flee from the arms of law, and therefore, petitioner No.4 be asked to surrender his passport. Vide Order dated 16.2.2010, petitioner No.4 Karanjit Singh was directed to surrender his passport to Station House Officer, Police Station, Phagwara, District Kapurthala, within three days. The Court has been informed that petitioner No.4 indeed has not abided by the order of the Court and has fled. Considering the above, bail granted to petitioner No.4 vide Order dated 3.8.2009 is hereby cancelled. The investigating agency is directed to take appropriate steps as a consequence of the fact that the said petitioner is no more on bail. Application is disposed of accordingly. Crl. Misc. No.M-19442 of 2008 This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing case FIR No.384 dated 4.12.2007 (Annexure P-2) under Sections 406, 498-A, 506 IPC registered with Police Station, City, Phagwara, District Kapurthala and consequent proceedings. The dispute arises out of the Crl. Misc. No. M-19442 of 2008 [3] marriage of petitioner No.4, Karanjit Singh, with complainant, Prabhjot Kaur. As noticed hereinabove, Karanjit Singh, taking undue advantage of bail granted by this Court, has fled the country and therefore, his bail has been cancelled. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that let the petition be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to take all the pleas in accordance with law at the appropriate stage. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (AJAI LAMBA) March 29, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?