IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS MONDAY, THE 27TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 5TH ASWINA 1932 Mat.Appeal.No. 163 of 2009(C) ---------------------------- OS.582/2005 of FAMILY COURT, KOTTARAKKARA .................... APPELLANTS : DEFENDANTS ------------------------------------ 1. KRISHNA KUMAR, AGED 42 YEARS, SON OF KRISHNA PILLAI, PANDARAZHKATHU VEEDU, PANIKKAL CHERRY, THATTAMALA, KOLLAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. RETHNAMMA, W/O. LATE KRISHNA PILLAI, AGED 65 YEARS, PANDARAZHKATHU VEEDU, PANIKKAL CHERRY, THATTAMALA, KOLLAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS. -------------------------------------- 1. POOJA, AGED 36 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF VELUKUTTY PILLAI, PARVATHY MANDIRAM, PADINJATTINKARA MURI, KOTTARAKKARA VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM. 2. APARNA, AGED 10 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF POOJA, PARVATHY MANDIRAM, PADINJATTINKARA MURI, KOTTARAKKARA VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALJK, KOLLAM. ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL FOR R1 & R2 THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. *********************** C.M.Appl.No.519 of 2009 & Mat.Appeal No.163 of 2009 ***************************** Dated this the 27th day of September, 2010 JUDGMENT BASANT, J. Appellants' counsel submits that he has no instructions. There is no submission or material produced to show that the conditions imposed vide order dated 21.06.2010 have been complied with. Inference appears to be irresistible that the petitioners/appellants are not interested in prosecuting this appeal now. 2. Accordingly the application for condonation of delay is dismissed. Consequently the Matrimonial Appeal shall stand rejected as barred by limitation. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE) rtr/