IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO.9702 of 1999 Between: Smt.K.N.Madhavi, W/o. K.L.N.Pramod Kumar. State Social Welfare Advisiory Board,Mazainine Gagan Vihar, Opp to Gandhi Bhavan M.J.Road, Hyderabad. R/o. 11-4-322/18/2, Srinivasanagar Colony, Chilakalaguda, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Chair-person, A.P.State Social Welfare Advisory Board, Mazainine Floor, Gagan Vihar, Opp:Gandhi Bhavan, M.J.Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Chair-person, Central Social Welfare Board, Samaj Kalyan Bhavan, B-12, Institutional Area, South of I.I.T., New Delhi. 3 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Secretary. Women and Child Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction (s) essentially in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to regularise the services of the Petitioner herein as Upper Division Clerk/Senior Assistant with effect from September, 1998 in which month and year she has completed 5 years of service on adhoc basis with all consequential benefits and attendant benefits including arrears of salaries seniority and promotion etc., and pass any such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper and necessary in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.SUDHENDER KULKARNI Counsel for the Respondents : The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondents in dispensing with the services of the petitioner vide Proceedings dated 25-9-1999 as arbitrary and illegal and to direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner. While admitting the Writ Petition, an interim order was passed directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization of her services. However, the said order was modified directing the respondents that as and when any work is available with reference to any schemes to be undertaken by the respondents, the services of the petitioner may have to be utilized by them on daily wage basis. Now the learned counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of the Writ Petition, petitioner has been appointed as Junior Assistant on regular basis by Proceedings dated 26-10-2005. In view of the above, no further orders are necessary in the Writ Petition and the same is liable to be closed. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. 13-3-2008 prk