1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP NO. 28107 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 836 OF 2005 1. T. K. A. Associates and another .. .. Applicants Versus Harikishan S/o Ramkishan Pardeshi .. .. Respondent Shri L. D. Vakil, Advocate for the Applicants. Shri G. K. Thigle, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : N. D. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 11TH DECEMBER, 2009. ORAL ORDER : 1. This civil application is filed under Order XXII Rule 1 and 11 read with Order I Rule 10 of Civil Procedure Code for substitution and addition of party who are the present applicants, since they are the purchasers of the suit property. 2. Heard Shri Thigle, learned counsel for the original appellant. He has no objection for consideration of this application as parties have deiced to compromise the dispute and have also seeking permission for submitting compromise petition before the First Appellate Court, in case the impugned judgment of the First Appellate Court is set aside in the appeal. 2 3. At the same time, there is request by the appellant for allowing the parties to settle the dispute by filing compromise petition. The respondents who are represented by Shri Vakil, has no objection for disposal of this second appeal in the above terms. In that view of the matter, the present civil application is allowed and disposed of. 4. The parties to take necessary steps to amend the title clause of the appeal memo joining the applicants as party respondents as prayed, in place of original respondents No. 1 to 6. Same amendment shall also be carried out in all the record at appropriate stages in order to make the compromise binding on all the parties. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] bsb/Dec.09