IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 15TH JANUARY 2009 / 25TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 37867 of 2008() ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- MALATHY, AGED 63, W/O. LATE ERATHU SADANANDAN, ERATHU VEETIL, ELAVALLY VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR. 2. THE ADDL. TAHSILDAR, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ELAVALLY, THRISSUR. GOVT.PLEADER SMT.SUDHADEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 37867 OF 2008 (G) ==================== Dated this the 15th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner states that she made an application to the 1st respondent for permission to remove ordinary earth from her property having an extent of 62 cents in Sy.No.71/1C of Elavally Village in Chavakkad Taluk. According to the petitioner, on the application, 1st respondent obtained a report from the 2nd respondent, a copy of which is Ext.P1. Petitioner complains that since then there has not been any progress in the matter and therefore this writ petition is filed complaining of delay in the disposal of her application. 2. Ext.P1 shows that in pursuance to the direction of the 1st respondent, the 2nd respondent has given the report as early as on 21/12/2007. If that be so, it is for the 1st respondent to consider the application made by the petitioner on which Ext.P1 report has been obtained. 3. Taking into account the complaint that there has not WPC 37867/08 :2 : been any progress in the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider the application made by the petitioner in the light of Ext.P1 and other related documents and pass orders thereon. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp