CW 5689/06 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.5689/2006 Mahipal Singh & (4) Ors Versus State & Ors. Date of Order ::: 13/01/09 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi None, for petitioner. Mr. Mahesh C. Gupta, Addl. Govt. Counsel, for State-respondents Instant petition has been filed with the grievance that despite petitioners being selected and appointed as Teachers Gr.III in districts Sirohi/Jhalawar vide orders dt. 04/04/05, 25/04/05, 04/05/05 & 25/04/05 (Ann.1 to 4), respondents were failed to post them at the places of their choice/priority stated at the time of submission of their applications. Only grievance as alleged in para 5 of the petition is that candidates of lower merit than petitioners were allotted their home districts vide orders dt.02/02/06 & 28/06/06 (Ann. 6 & 7). What has been referred to in para 5 of the petitioner is vague and does not disclose as to who were the persons having lower merit than petitioners and opted for district of their choice at the time of submission of application still posted in those districts. Contrarily in para 4 of reply to the petition, it has been specifically averred that preference CW 5689/06 //2// /choice for appointment were called for from applicants for allotment of their districts but their appointments were made on the basis of priority and petitioners were allotted districts as per their preference & choice. Later on, affidavit has been filed by respondents in which it has been averred that preferences were given to handicapped/disabled widow, unmarried female candidates and the order was accordingly passed on 17/01/06. No material has been placed by petitioners to substantiate claim with respect to their right to appointment in home districts, in absence whereof, this court finds no justification to interfere in the action of respondents impugned herein. Consequently, writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p.2/5689CW06-13Jn.doc