^^s;^' ,ff^n~', Trr ^^i;y^Li •» { {^] C^ 1 ^o^-— IN THE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P4^'NO.-Lt8<S3 /2006 PETITIONER Awdhesh Kumar Yadav. S/o.B.R. Yadav R/o Mahasamund Tahsil and District Mahasamund. RESPONDENTS ^^> ^^'•"' .x^^"" ^y A^ VERSUS 1. TheStateofChhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Department ofHealth & Welfare D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director Health Services District-Raipur(C.G.) CT.O0^ ^- ChiefMedical Officer, ^svy ^ jy .3? ^ ^y y^ ^: C/C\^~ Distt.-Mahasamund (C.G.) / 4. Collector Mahasamund District Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER_ARTICLE 22'6/227 OF THE ^^ <^ 5^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HQPCBLE MR-^ATISH K. AGNIHOTM, J. WRIT PETITION fS.) N0.4803 OF 2006 Petitioner Awdhesh Kumar Yadav versus Respondents The State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mrs. Renu Kochar, counsel for the petitioner. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the respondents/State. ORDER •& (Passed on 5m ofSeptember, 2006) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that fhe petitioner is employed as Ophthalmic Assistant. By order dated 30-6-2000, tiie petitioner was transferred to fhe office of Chief Medical and Healfh Officer, Mahasamund. In view of non- availability ofwork, by order dated 22-8-2000 (Annexure P-3), the petitioner was directed to be posted at Community Health Centre, Basna, within District Mahasamund. By Ifae impugned oider dated 19-7-2006 (Annexme P-1), the petitioner has been transfen-ed to join Community Health Centre, Basna as an employee of Community Health Centre, Basna. 2. The petitioner seeks liberty of this Court to make a representation to the respondents - autfaorities for retaining his services at Mahasamund, keeping in view his family conditions and otiier problems, to which leamed eounsel appearing for fhe respondents/State has no objection. 3. The petitioner is accordingly granted liberty to make a representatioa raising all the grounds available to him for consideration ofhis posting to the respondents - authorities. In the event, such representation, if so advised, is made, fhe same may be considered in accordance with law, on its own merit, within reasonable period. 4. With the above observation, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Certified copy as per roles. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Cfopal