IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH OCTOBER 2009 / 22ND ASWINA 1931 LA.App..No. 1243 of 2005() -------------------------- LAR.4/2002 of SUB COURT, PAYYANNUR .................... APPELLANT(S//RESPONDENT NO. 1: -------------- SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), OECF, KANNUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. LATHA T.THANKAPPAN RESPONDENT(S)/CLAIMANT & RESPONDENT NO. 2: --------------- 1. BEATRICE MOOZHAYIL, REGIONAL SUPERIOR, SISTER OF ST.ELIZABETH, PRESHITHA BHAVAN, KEEZJAMADU VILLAGE, THOTTUMUGHAM, ALWAYS REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER OF SR.ALICE JOHN, SISTER SUPERIOR, ELIZABETH NIKETAN, KAITHAPRAM, THUMPENI, SREEKANDAPURAM P.O. 2. THE PROJECT OFFICER, OECF, PROJECTS, KANNUR, MALAPPARAMBA, KOZHIKODE. ADV. SRI.BABU VARGHESE, SC, KWA FOR R2 SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER FOR R1 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------ L.A.A.No.1243 OF 2005 ------------------------ Dated this the 14th day of October, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. we have heard the submissions of the learned Government Pleader Smt.Latha T.Thankappan and also those of Sri.Babu Varghese, learned Standing Counsel for the Water Authority who supported all the submissions of the learned Government Pleader. We have heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the claimant. We have carefully scanned the impugned judgment. We find that it is relying on the very title deed of the claimant that enhancement has been granted by the Reference Court. What the court below has done is to give additions to the value reflected in the title deed for the passage of time. The approach of the learned Sub Judge was quite reasonable. We do not find any warrant for interference. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE dpk