m INTHEHON>B HI<^GQU^OFCHHATTISGARH ;AT-:BILASPUR;.: -".' '-',: ; .••'^'•: W.P.IStNO^B /2010 ^-•'i PETITIONER ^V^IS^ ^^^^l'E^ RESPONDENTS ^ '€^^ :^t^yp"'"' Smt. Elizabeth, Tirlsey .^®®.: SKri Gragory Tirfcey," ; aged alaoi.it 40 years, Wcirkings.as Head Masfer, T.W.D. New Priinary Sehool, Laiitbrtoli, BIock Kunkyri; Distri&t Jashpur.fG.G.): ::; .^. •'• ^.,:^ VBRSUS : • .-,.••' :::.^:::w^ :1, ;^Stateof;ChhattisgarK,' ^ ;.:^ . ^:.,:;.: 'THr-ough :-;:The^Secretaiy,^.'^^^ TribalWelfare DepartEnent, i^ % D.K.S. Bha;n^,Raip^(€';.G.)s 2. Assistant eommissipiier, Tribal Welfare '•DeparlaTieH^ Jashpur, Distt.- Jasttpur (C-G-):; '• : i::..:.;';'.'^;.!'t^'^ '3. BIock EduGation OfBeer, ^ • ,'-\:Block-'I<uhkuri.\;'i''^.'^.I''l':::s.^'^ •.•.l'Dis^.-:Jashgur':(©,0.:),\:.^^:.%:^%:^ 4. \Treasury OfHcer; Treasuiy: sys'::'; Aceoun^Ss Pensidn ; ; .^^^^^^^^ S Jaslripur, Distt.-Ja.sKp'Hr (eyG^^ WMTPEn*I1'IC^IHCT3!ERaR1^I^2260F?I^ CONfiTITlJ'iEIONO^INDIA ^il ^i's^ iii^imsBBffs ii l=ti!ll J^L^l^. "111 tpan* >yTT)BriutilliS'Hafln'tlWihH^i' s^" PETiTIONER HIGH COURT OF CMHATTISGARH_LBILASPUR WRITPETItlON^NG).2308bR201& ^ Srat.ElizabethTirkey RESRONDENTS Versus StatgofChhattisgarh&Gthers (WritPefitiohunderArtide 226.0f lheCpnsti(utioni5i(1nclia) SingIeBencKsHpn'l»leShriSat>shK.AgnihOtri,J.. Present;- Gowri ShrjSomkantVermaj.Adv&eatSfct'thepetitJoner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel LawyerfortheState. ORDER«3RAy (Passedonthis6mdayofMay,2010) 1) By this petition, the petitioher seeks a direction 16 the respohdents tp pay tvw advanca inorements^ fn^ Ihe date oT passing of B.Ed. examiriation,oriherown®(penses,beft)TeenteriOgintoservice. 2) Learnpd (»unser appeanrig for the petitiqner suta involved in the present case 1s np longer res tfitegra &s thesatne has been consideredand decided bythe Supreme Court in yflsto Saxena v. StateGfMJ'.&Ors1. • 3) 1-earned counsei fijrther submits that the instant petition is squarely cxwered ^ the deeision& ^URI^ permitted tsmakeAB^n^ntaUoni'to^^xJi^ aforestateddeoisions,subjeertto^nflc^ion(^ffie^ 4) Leamedcounsetappearingfor^heStatesubrnitstha(intfieevent,the petitioner makes a repr^entatipn, the sarae will be considered and decided, in accorclance with lav and in the light of the decisions of fhe Supreme C^urt in iflste Saxeoa (supra), within a j^ from Ihe date <rf recejpt of thie representation. S)lnviewoffbregoing,accordingtotheleamedeounselappearingfoFthe petitioner, nolhingsurviveslnthispetitionfpTSdjudication. 6) Accofdihgty.thewritpetitionisyisposedof. 12009(ill)MPJR(SQ)59 E[E£^ £ "* "