IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2011 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 31102 of 2011(K) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- ABDUL NAZAR P., S/O. KUNJU MUHAMMED, AGED 31 YEARS, PANDARATHODY HOUSE, PAZHAMALLOOR P.O., KOOTTILANGADY VIA., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. (OWNER OF KL-10/Y 3309). BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE/RDO, PERINTHALMANNA, PERINTHALMANNA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 505. 2. SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALAPPURAM POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM - 676 505. 3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, MALAPPURAM - 676 505. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.M.J. RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 31102/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ON SIGNED ON 9.11.11 RECEIVED ON 17.11.11 IN NO.K-3.7361/11. P2: COPY OF REVISION FILED BY THE PETITIONER ON 18.11.11 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P3: COPY OF APPLICATION FOR INTERIM CUSTODY OF THE VEHICLE DTD.18.11.11 FILED ALONG WITH REVISION PETITION BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 31102 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order passed by the first respondent, issued under the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001 petitioner has filed Ext.P2 revision before the 3rd respondent. Along with Ext.P3 application, the petitioner also filed application for interim custody of the vehicle. On that orders have not been passed so far. Hence this writ petition. 2. Having regard to the pendency of Ext.P2 revision against Ext.P1 order I dispose of the writ petition directing the 3rd respondent to consider the revision with notice to the petitioner and as expeditiously as possible at any rate within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. 3. In the meanwhile, on the production of a copy of W.P.(C) No. 31102 OF 2011 :2 : this judgment Ext.P3 revision filed by the petitioner will also be pursued and orders thereon shall be passed by the 3rd respondent applying the Full Bench decision of this Court in Shan C.T. v. State of Kerala [2010(3)KHC 333]. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge