Crl. Misc. No. M- 698 of 2009 Jagminder Singh @ Peel vs. State of Haryana Present: Mr.S.S.Malik,Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Ashok Kumar Jindal, AAG, Haryana Mr. J.S.Mor, Advocate for the complainant. *** At the time of issuing notice of motion, following order was passed by this Court on 21.1.2009:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner states that Fateh Chand Jain is the owner of the agency i.e. Farm Track Tractor at Jind. The petitioner has no concerned with the same and had been unnecessarily involved in this case. Notice of motion to Advocate General, Haryana for 16.3.2009. In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the petitioners be admitted to interim bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. However, he shall join the investigation as and when called and shall abide by the provisions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.” Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Randhir Singh, has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record a copy of the partnership deed with regard to M/s Jind Tractors, Jind. A perusal of the same reveals that the petitioner is not a partner of the said firm. Whether the petitioner has connived with Fateh Chand Jain` with regard to the alleged commission of offence would more appropriately be gone into and Crl. Misc. No. M- 698 of 2009 -2- considered during trial. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed. Interim bail granted by this Court on 12.1.2009 is confirmed. (SABINA) JUDGE March 16, 2009 PARAMJIT