IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD DATED: THIS the 30th day of April, 2011. PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CRL.P.No. 3735 of 2011 Between: P. Srinivasa Goud ..Petitioner and The state and another. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CRL.P.No. 3735 of 2011 O r d e r: Heard the petitioner’s counsel and also the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. The allegations in the FIR do show the offences and hence it is not a fit case for quashing the FIR. It may also be noted that after completing the investigation the police may choose to put the petitioner on trial or may close the case. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has been implicated in the case because the property pertaining to the complainant was sold away by the wife of the Father of a Church. I am of the opinion that arrest of the petitioner should be stayed till completion of the investigation. 3. Accordingly this petition is disposed of directing the police that they can go ahead with the investigation, but they shall not arrest the petitioner till conclusion of the investigation and the charge sheet is filed. _____________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J. April 30, 2011. *BVS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CRL.P.No. 3735 of 2011 April 30, 2011.