Crl. Misc. No. M-30552 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-30552 of 2011 Date of Decision : November 01, 2011 Parveen .... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Satbir Gill, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Senior DAG, Haryana. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Accused Parveen has filed this petition for anticipatory bail in case FIR No.654 dated 27.08.2011, under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station City Sirsa, District Sirsa. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. According to the prosecution version, theft of cash amount of Rs.4,500/- and coins of Rs.2,500/- and 20 packets of cigarettes worth Rs.1,000/- was committed in the shop of the complainant. Crl. Misc. No. M-30552 of 2011 2 Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Shamsher Singh, stated that in this case, two persons have already been arrested and recovery of some stolen property has been effected from them. Both of them have named the present petitioner also to be their accomplice in the commission of the theft. Counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner has been named by one co-accused being inimical to him. However, according to the prosecution version, both the co-accused have named the petitioner to be involved in the occurrence with them. Part of the stolen property is yet to be recovered. Keeping in view the aforesaid, but without meaning to express any opinion on merits of the case, I do not find it to be a fit case to grant the petitioner concession of anticipatory bail. Dismissed. November 01, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE