IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46325 of 2005 ***** 1. Arun Kumar, Son of Bilat Rai, 2. Bilat Rai, Son of late Ayodhya Rai, 3. Pramila Devi, Wife of Bilat Rai, 4. Aaditya Kumar, Son of Bilat Rai. All are resident of Mohalla-Jai Prakash Nagar, P.S.-Khagaria, District-Khagaria. ….. ….. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Laxmi Devi, Wife of Arun Kumar, resident of Mohalla-Jai Prakash Nagar, P.S. Khagaria, District-Khagaria Permanent address, D/o Late Brahmdeo Singh, resident of village- Nayagaon, Shiromani Tola, P.S.-Parbatta, District-Khagaria. ….. ….. opposite parties ----------- 24. 10.4.2009. After having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State as well as counsel for the opposite party no.2, from the contention made at the Bar on behalf of the Petitioners, the Court is of the opinion that the dispute can only be established by a trial in the matter. Vendetta cannot be a ground for quashing a proceeding in view of the nature of allegations made and the denial of relationship by the husband of the complainant-opposite party no.2. The quashing application is dismissed. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)