THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO CRIMINAL R.C.Nos.227, 228, 229 and 230 OF 2009 COMMON ORDER: 1 All these revisions arise out of the complaint in Cr.No.307 of 2008 on the file of the Suryapet Police Station where under on a complaint said to have been given by one Somla, offences under sections 420 of IPC and also under sections 4, 5, and 6 of Prize Chits & Money Circulations Schemes (Banning) Act, 1973 and under Section 5 of A.P. Protection of Depositors and Financial Establishment Act were registered and during the course of investigation petitioners/accused filed Crl.M.P.No.40 of 2009 seeking permission to compound the offences and the learned Judge by order dated 16.01.2009 allowed the application and permitted the parties to compound the offences. Challenging that as being without jurisdiction and the offences being not compoundable, Crl.R.C.No.227 of 2009 is filed. Consequent upon the permission given in Crl.M.P.No.40 of 2009, orders were passed in Crl.M.P.No.41 of 2009 recording the compromise and the offences having been compounded, the accused were acquitted under Section 320(8) Cr.P.C and that order is challenged in Crl.R.C.No.228 of 2009. Consequent on the acquittal, accused 1 and 2 filed Crl.M.P.No.42 of 2009 for return of some properties and the same has been allowed. As against that order, Crl.R.C.No.229 of 2009 is filed. Accused 1 and 2 have filed Crl.M.P.No.43 of 2009 for certain directions with regard to the bank account and that petition was also allowed. As against that order, Crl.R.C.No.230 of 2009 is filed. 2 In all these revision cases, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor contends that except the offence under Section 420 of IPC, the other offences are not compoundable and consequently the orders passed by the learned Sessions Judge are without jurisdiction and illegal and the investigation has to be proceeded with. But, however, the learned counsel for the respondents contended that on the application of A.1 and A.2 in Criminal Petition No.2814 of 2010 this court by its order dated 25.03.2010 has quashed the proceedings in Crime No.307 of 2008 in exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Therefore, as matters stand as on this day, the proceedings in Crime No.307 of 2008 on the file of the P.S. Suryapet have been quashed by this court and consequently no further investigation will be taken up by the police and these Criminal Revision Cases have become infructuous by virtue of the orders passed by this Court in Criminal Petition No.2814 of 2010. 3 Accordingly all these Criminal Revision Cases are disposed of. ------------------------------- N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO, J. 02.11.2011 Kvsn