IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 20977 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: September 9, 2010. Gurharpreet Singh @Sharanjit Singh @Bhatti ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab ...... RESPONDENT(s) Present: Mr. R.S.Rai, Sr.Advocate with Mr. D.S.Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Bhavna, D.A.G., Punjab. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in FIR No.121 dated 01.07.2008, under Sections 307/323/341/506/ 148/149/34 IPC and 25/27/54/59 Arms Act, registered at Police Station Samrala, District Khanna. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that injury attributed to the petitioner is though by firearm however, the same is on the ankle i.e. on non-vital part of the body of the complainant. The CRM No.M-20977 of 2010 complainant was hospitalized however, he was discharged just after 4/5 days. Further contended that main witness i.e. the complainant has already been examined and that no other witness has been examined so far and hence, case is not likely to be decided in near future. All these facts have not been disputed by learned counsel for the State. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant application for regular bail filed on behalf of Gurharpreet Singh @Sharanjit Singh @Bhatti is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Ludhiana. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) September 9, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2