1 W.P.No.3675.98 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3675 OF 1998 M/s.Krupp Industries India Ltd. ... Petitioner v/s Shri Rajkumar S. Tiwari & anr. ... Respondents Ms.Neha Mehta i/by Mr.K.P.Anilkumar for the petitioner. Mr.A.S.Rao for the respondents. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 25TH AUGUST, 2010 P.C.: 1. Mr.Rao appearing for the 1st respondent states that the dispute between the petitioner and the 1st respondent has been settled. However, the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner has no instructions in the matter. 2. Mr.Rao states that respondent No.1 has no intention of implementing the order passed in Revision Application (ULP) No.23 of 1996. 2 W.P.No.3675.98 3. In view of this statement made by Mr.Rao, which is accepted, the petition becomes infructuous. 4. Hence, writ petition stands dismissed. Rule discharged. ..... 3 W.P.No.3675.98