HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G.S. SINGHVI AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Appeal No.316 of 2007 Between: P.C. Reddy … Appellants And The Sub-Registrar (Joint-I), O/o. the District Registrar, Ranga Reddy District and another … Respondents ::JUDGMENT:: Counsel for the appellant: Shri C. Sudhesh Anand Counsel for respondent No.2: Shri V. Venkataramana Dated: 17th April, 2007 Per G.S. Singhvi, CJ Feeling aggrieved by order dated 9-11-2006 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.13727 of 2006, the appellant has preferred this appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent. The appellant claims to have purchased Ac.2-20 gts. of land comprised in Survey No.46, Madenaguda, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District from respondent No.2 vide registered sale deed dated 12-5-2006. He also claims to have been put in possession. After about one month and few days of the registration of sale deed, the appellant filed Writ Petition No.13727 of 2006 for cancellation of document bearing No.13325/2006 dated 22-6-2006 vide which the earlier sale deed was cancelled. The learned Single Judge referred to the judgment of the Full Bench in Yanala Malleshwari v. Ananthula Sayamma[1] and held that the petitioner (the appellant) does not have the locus to challenge cancellation deed dated 22-6-2006. Learned counsel for the appellant fairly conceded that the issue raised in the appeal is covered by the judgment of the Full Bench in Yanala Malleshwari v. Ananthula Sayamma (supra). In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed. As a sequel to the dismissal of the appeal, WAMP No.612 of 2007 filed by the appellant for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. G.S. SINGHVI, CJ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J April 17, 2007 svs [1] 2006 (6) ALD 623 (FB)