C7~i?/ © @ S.B. (Service Mattert IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATHSGARH) WRTT PETmON N0.3<i3$ /2006.~ PETmONER: ^s^- ^p^:::...--' ". Q.-": .<^fnMYVS' ^y'^ ^\&'- Respondents Rohit KunaarVerma, Son of Shri Rewa Ram Verma, aged about 41 years, Asst. Teacher, Goveminent Priinary School, Miihgaon, Block Eklucation, Saja, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Tlu-ough The Secretary School Eklucation Department Ministiy D.K-S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director of School Education Office, D.K-S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. The District Mucation OS&cer, Bemetara, 'Ilirough Block Development Education Officer, Saja, Durg, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETIT10N UNDER AKnCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSITTtmON OF WDIA FOR 'mE ISSUANCE OF WRTT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI. PROHJBmQN AND FOR THE 0-mER SIMHAR WRTT OR WRTTS. ORDER OR ORDERS. DIRECTION OR DIREC'HONS. A XI-HC-78 <flWfTSih*1|ch 3^ -^WM^, ®Tfly'|6,f^c)iyy< .^.f..'yo,'.^?.is°Jp.fc TH; 200 3TT^T<4atti (llcl^d':t^sT) ^n^T^rR-ii'b trarsn^rgiiira; ??(nw^fs?r3n^r ^prfepfrr WTcff ir'te^i- ^3Tf^T3TT^T 7.8.2006:- Heard Shri O.P. Sahu, couns^l for- the petitioner. Shrj Sumesh Bcyqj, 6.A. for ^.he respondents, on advance copy. By this petition, the petition^r has proyed thatrespondents be directed to grant two advance increments to ^•he petitioner, as the petitioner has passed the B. Ed. examination on his own exbenses. The case of the petitione is that he was appointed as ^ssistant Teacher on 27.2.1984 vide Ani^xure P-3. As per Instructions dated 24-12-1998 issued by erstwhile Sta e of M.P. the Assistant Teacher-s who have passed -the B.Ed. examination befoife 22.10.1964 are entitled for two advance increments and the teachers who have passed the B.Ed. examination after 22.10.1964 on their own expenses o^e alsoentitled for two advance incr'ements. Other similarly situated persons h^ive moved on application before the State Administrative Tribunal, Bench at them and based on that they have fiaipup, the Tribunal has granted r-elief to been granted two advance increments. The petitioner had passed B. Ed. exam'irlption on his own expenses in the year 1994- 95 yide Annexure P-5 and inspite similar treatment is not being given Therefor-e, learned counse| petitioner may be altowed to mak No.3 and in turn, he be directed to| which Shri Bcycy, iearned ffovt. Adv^ Having heard learned counse of representation mode by the petitioner Ito him. for the petitioner submits that the a detailed repr-esentation to respondent Idecide the same in accordance with law, to icate for the State has no objection. for the parties, hav'm9 regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, witfliout expressing any opinion on the roerit of the case, the petitioner is allowed -^o make a detailed representation along with P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3^ '<ii'i<i<-i^, yiTTly'Ka, Ric'iiyy w-rcn ^Hrai ^ 200 3(T^?T<Tg?R (yi^siqff) •Sn^T qiT R^jch ^.sn^TsFiWq; TOITWBfScTsn^T -z^ 'bi-tiTTi'ifl-f MitidTir'tei^t <.lai<-Ai(. ^i 3if^n a.n^r Roshan « copy of this petition raisit^ all h|s 9rievances to respondent No.3 within a period of 15 days from today arw| in turn, respondent No.3 is directed to examine the case of the petition^r in the light of averments made by the petitioner in this petition ond in ti(e representation also. If respondent No.3 reaches to the conclusion that sinl benefit of two advance increments iiarly situated persons have been gronted id the petitioner's cose is also covered for grant of two advance increments 0(1 the basis of Sovernment's order, then to pass orders within a period of 3 moi^ths from todey. in accordance uuith law. With the direction aforesai4 the petition stands disposed of. Parties are entitled for cert^fied copy of this order. --; Sfa-i- L.C. Bhsaoo Judge ^' P.T.O.