IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15048 of 2010 RATAN KUMAR RAO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 27.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Repeated writ application in similar kind of prayer is not an answer for the petitioner because even according to him and in view of Annexure-3, already a direction for implementation of Hon’ble Supreme Court order has been passed by learned Single Judge. Since the petitioner also happens to be a member of Bihar Rajya Yakshma Association his case/claim would be covered by the order of the earlier writ application. Inaction on the part of the respondent State to carry out the order would mean remedy by initiation of a contempt proceeding instead of filing of yet another writ application. Therefore the petitioner may file a contempt application, if so advised. This writ application is dismissed with the liberty aforesaid. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)