1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4665 OF 2008 (Maroti Kisan Buradkar vs. Ganu Kisan Buradkar & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DECEMBER 11, 2008. Heard Shri Marathe, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Khapre, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and Shri Harode, learned counsel for respondents No. 2 to 5. Shri Khapre, learned counsel has pointed out that he has filed pursis on behalf of daughter-in- law of deceased Respondent No.1. He points out that Regular Civil Appeal No. 101 of 2008, in which the impugned order has been passed, the proceedings in appeal should be expedited and writ petition should be disposed of, as if the petitioner is directed to bring legal representatives of Respondent No.1 on record that will create various problems as writ petition itself is filed against a dead person. Shri Marathe, learned counsel is not present before this Court but Shri Harode, learned counsel states that he has communication with Shri Marathe and Shri Marathe has also agreed to 2 expeditious disposal of appeal itself. In the circumstances, with the consent of all the counsel, the following order is passed : 1. The proceedings in Regular Civil Appeal No. 101 of 2008 are expedited and the appellate Court shall endeavour to decide the appeal itself finally as early as possible and in any case by 31.7.2009. 2. The Petitioner before this Court should file private paper book in the matter by 31.1.2009. 3. The interim direction issued on 19.9.2008 by the Court below to continue till the decision in appeal. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.