Crl.Misc. No.M-22412 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc. No.M-22412 of 2011. Date of decision: August 11, 2011. Jaswinder Singh. .. Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab. .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI * * * PRESENT Mr.Sanjay Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Arshvinder Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab. * * * M.M.S.BEDI, J (ORAL). Petitioner seeks the concession of pre-arrest bail in a case which was registered at the instance of Balwinder Kaur alleging that on 17.01.2011, she was assaulted by the petitioner along with Rajinder Singh and Tirath Ram and his wife Rani. The complainant was allegedly hit on her left elbow, left eye and Chin and some fist blows were also given to her by non-petitioner Rani on the chest. The complainant was removed to the hospital who subsequently died on 22.01.2011. The complainant had received serious injuries on her person. After the death of complainant, . . . 1 Crl.Misc. No.M-22412 of 2011 offence under Section 304 IPC was added. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been attributed a stick blow only on the person of the deceased-complainant and that she died on account of chronic heart ailment. Reliance has been placed on the MLR of mother of the petitioner which indicates that she had lost one tooth of lower Jaw and fresh bleeding was found when she was examined. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. I have heard the counsel for the petitioner and gone through the record and nature of the allegations. The petitioner has been attributed an injury on the left elbow of the deceased. It will be pre-mature, at this stage, to enter into niceties of the trial to determine whether the part attributed to the petitioner and others could result in death of deceased by appreciating the alleged contradictions in the ocular version and medical evidence. The cause of death, as per Post Mortem Report being 'coronary heart disease' is not a sufficient ground, at this stage, to grant the concession of pre-arrest bail. All the circumstances pointed by the counsel for the petitioner may constitute good ground for the grant of regular bail. No extra ordinary exceptional circumstances exist to grant the concession of pre-arrest bail. Dismissed. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE August 11, 2011. rka . . . 2