w 1” IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUR R CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION No5.7 Eg /2oos PETITIONER Tukendra Prasad Verma a S/o Late Shn‘ Buddhu Singh Verma Age about 45 years, Asstt. Teacher Govt. Middle School, Khaparikala Block—Tilda, Distt— VERSUS 9%: dated PresenmdhySh:i.,.§f. gmwg/ W 4 . . . f 7 / IRx RESPONDENT & State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Educaion Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur(C.G.) ‘ District Education Officerr’ Raipur (C.G.) Biock Education OfFIcer I CONSTITUTION OF IN N xx N DIA “K a W .IVIIIaLE B $ ci EAT BILASPUR Raipur (C.G.) t “ A 5 @ HIGH $QURT OF GHHATTI$GARH kT EihAsPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON‘BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNiHOTRi J. ‘ l WRIT PETiTiON is.) No.51 88 OF 200$ Petitionef Tukendra Prasad Verma 2f” versus Respondents State Govt. of Chhamsgarh and others Present : Mr.Ajay Shrivastava, counseiforthe petitioner. Mrs. Anju Abuja, Deputy Government Advocate for the respondentslState. ORDE§ {Passed en '3 of Oaobet, 2906) Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working as Assistant Teacher in the Government Middle Schooi, Khaparikaia, Block Tilda, District Raipur. in the course \\\ \ of his service, the petitioner passed BEd. Examination on 27—3—1 996 at \“xn his own expenses. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the decision of this Court in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj vs. Municipai Corporation, Durg and another”, wherein it has been held that the Durg Teachers, having obtained B.Ed., M.Ed., B.T.l. Certiticates, at their own expenses, would be entitled to two advance increments. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the decision in the matter of Yashwani Kumar Bharadwaj (Supra). Learned counsel appearing for the respondentslState fairiy concedes to the position and agreee with the statements made by iearned counse! for the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, this petition is aiiowed in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumr Bharadwaj a (Supra), subiect to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed. Certificate at his own expenses and further whether he has been paid wo advance increments or no No ord as to t t, er costs. W W“ '\ 1 i L i i i i Sd/- ‘ K Satish . Agnihotri Judge Certified copy as per rutes, 1 2006 (H) MPJ R-CG 96 Gopal wra#MW W