THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL No.2322 of 2005 JUDGMENT: (Per BPR,J) Heard the counsel for both sides. The un-successful writ petitioner is the appellant herein who filed this appeal against the dismissal of the WP.No.18635 of 2005, dated 02.11.2005, wherein he assailed the orders of suspension, dated 28.08.2003. However, the fact remains that the impugned order is only that of suspension, against which an appeal is also filed and the same is still pending. Having regard to the expiry of period of six months, it is obligatory on the part of the respondents herein to review the orders of suspension, but no such orders have been passed. The only point that arises in this appeal is as to whether the respondents had passed any such order or not. Even otherwise, the appellant did not make any representation in this regard. In the circumstances, it would suffice in the interest of justice to permit the appellant herein to file an application before the respondents herein pointing out in not reviewing the suspension order as required under the rules. On such filing, the respondents are directed to pass orders in accordance with law. Subject to the above, the writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. The appellant is directed to file an application within one week from today and the 3rd respondent shall dispose of the same within a period of two weeks there from. _____________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J ________________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J Date: 01.12.2005 ES