IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11963 of 2010 1. MUKESH GUPTA S/O LATE PAWAN GUPTA R/O VILL.- SIMARIYAGHAT, P.S.- BARAUNI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 2. AWINASH KUMAR S/O LATE PAWAN GUPTA R/O VILL.- SIMARIYAGHAT, P.S.- BARAUNI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 3. SANTOSH KUMAR S/O LATE BISHWANATH GUPTA R/O VILL.- SIMARIYAGHAT, P.S.- BARAUNI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 4. AJAY SAH S/O RAM SAKAL SAH R/O VILL.- MEHNDA SAHPUR, P.S.- CHERIA BARIYARPUR, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 5. MUNNA KUMAR S/O MAHESH DAS R/O VILL.- SIMARIYAGHAT, P.S.- BARAUNI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 6. SUJEET KUMAR S/O LATE RAM SAGAR GUPTA R/O VILL.- MAHNA, P.S.- BARAUNI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 7. RAM KISHUN DAS S/O LATE CHANDRADEEP DAS R/O VILL.- SIMARIYAGHAT, P.S.- BARAUNI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 8. MEGHNATH DAS S/O LATE LALAN DAS R/O VILL.- SIMARIYAGHAT, P.S.- BARAUNI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 9. PANNA LAL DAS S/O DHURAN DAS R/O VILL.- SIMARIYAGHAT, P.S.- BARAUNI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 10. SURAJ DAS S/O BHAGWAN DAS R/O VILL.- SIMARIYAGHAT, P.S.- BARAUNI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Amish Jha, Advocate For the State : G.P. 10. ----------- 2. 20.05.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the State. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the reliefs sought are covered by a decision of this Court in CWJC No. 10930 of 2010 and therefore he may be permitted to approach the authorities with a copy of the same. If the petitioners claim to be covered by any order of this Court it is expected that their grievances shall be considered in light of the same and if satisfied the respondents shall accord them similar treatment and shall not multiply litigations by insisting upon them to obtain separate individual order. Conversely if the respondents are not satisfied that they are similarly situated as the writ petition of another case entitled to similar relief, the least that is expected is that the respondents shall pass a reasoned and speaking order distinguishing the case of the petitioners to facilitate judicial review, should the occasion arise. This Court has not gone into merits of the matter. Nothing in the present order shall be construed as any opinion or observation of the Court on merits which shall remain entirely in the discretion of the respondents to be exercised in accordance with law. The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)