THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 4867 OF 2009 ORDER: 1. Challenging the order dated 11.12.2007 passed in I.A. No.134 of 2007 in O.S. No.89 of 2005 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Jagtial, whereunder and whereby the petitioners, who are defendants 2 and 3 in the suit, were directed to deposit rent amount. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. 3. The impugned order reads as follows: “Counter not filed. Condition not complied and therefore petition is allowed with a direction to deposit to Rent amount. Accordingly, petition allowed.” The learned counsel for the petitioners contended that counter was filed on 23.3.2007 in I.A. No.134 of 2007 and the same has not been taken into consideration. Similarly, the order under challenge does not indicate or reveal which condition was not complied with. Therefore, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the trial Court for disposal afresh in accordance with law after giving opportunity to both the parties, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. 4. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, allowed. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 27.1.2011 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 4867 OF 2009 27.1.2011 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 4867 OF 2009 27.1.2011 Between: Ryagalla Laxmirajam & another …Petitioners And Sama Bhoolaxmi & others …Respondents