IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 26TH JULY 2011 / 4TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 19366 of 2011(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- LAL PRASAD, S/O.SUKUMARAN, KALLINGAL VEEDU, MEENADU EAST, CHATHANNOOR P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL SRI.SAIJU S. SRI.T.PRASAD RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL LINES, CUTCHERY P.O., KOLLAM-13. 2. DR.D.SAJITH BABU, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CIVIL LINES, KOLLAM-691013. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KOTTARAKKARA P.O., KOLLAM-691506. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTTARAKKARA POLICE STATION, KOTTARAKKARA P.O., KOLLAM-691506. GP SMT. RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 19366 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE MAHAZAR PREPARED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 28.4.11 EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATIION DATED 3.5.11 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B-3707/2011 DATED 6.5.2011 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE FIR AND FIS IN CRIME NO.954 OF 2011 OF KOTTARAKKARA POLICE STATION EXT.P5 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 2.7.11 FILED BY THE PETITIONER EXT.P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B-3737/2011 DATED 7.7.11 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P7 : TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(P) NO.297/2011/HOME DATED 28.1.2011 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT (TRUE COPY) P.A TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).19366/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 26th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner challenges Ext.P6 final order passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate exercising his power under Section 23 of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001 (in short 'the Act'). Since the right or revision is available to the petitioner under Section 23B of the Act, the writ petition is dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue his statutory remedies. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs