-: 1 :- wp2736/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2736 OF 2010 Kishor Shamrao Jadhav. ..Petitioner. Versus Yadrav Co­op. Bank Ltd & Others. ..Respondents. Mr. Sameer Tambekar for the petitioner. Mr. Nagesh Chavan i/b Mr. T. S. Ingale for respondent no.1. Mr. R. M. Patne, AGP for respondent nos. 4 & 5. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : July 21, 2010. P. C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. By the impugned order, the Divisional Joint Registrar dismissed the petitioner’s revision for non compliance of provisions of Section 154(2) of the MCS Act, 1960. The learned counsel for the petitioner could not point out any infirmity in the impugned order. He, however, submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to deposit 50% of the recoverable dues with respondent no.1 society within the period of 8 weeks and his revision may be restored to file for hearing on merits. I also find that the revision is not dismissed on merits. In view of this position and considering the statement of the petitioner, in the interest of justice, I find that revision srp -: 2 :- wp2736/10 needs to be restored for hearing on merits. I therefore pass following order. ­: O R D E R : ­ (1) The petitioner shall deposit 50% of the recoverable dues with respondent no.1 society within the period of eight weeks from today. (2) On the petitioner’s depositing the amount in terms of clause (1) above, the impugned order shall stand quashed and set aside and the revision shall stand restored to file. The Divisional Joint Registrar shall hear the revision on merits and shall endevour to dispose of the revision as expeditiously as possible. (3) In the event the petitioner fails to deposit the amount as stipulated above in clause (1), the impugned order stands confirmed. (4) With the aforesaid directions, writ petition is disposed of. (R.V. MORE, J.)