IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3047 of 2007 MAHABIR SAH Versus LAKSHMI DAS ----------- 6 16.10.2008 Delay in filing the restoration application is condoned. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the name of the parties in the restoration application. Learned counsel for the petitioner filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner in the restoration application. C.R.No. 2320 of 2005 was dismissed for non prosecution on 4.10.2007. During the pendency of the civil revision application, the sole petitioner had died and a substitution petition had been filed without Vakalatnama . A restoration application has now been filed and for the reasons stated therein it is allowed, subject to the substitution application being allowed. Petitioner would now require to file a fresh Vakalatnama in the two supplementary substitution applications in the civil revision. The substitution application in the civil revision will now be listed after filing fresh Vakalatnama. SINGH (Navaniti Prasad Singh)