1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR . Criminal Application No.394 of 2010. SAU. SHOBHABAI CHAVHAN VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA. ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri R. B. Jadhav, Advocate for applicant. Mrs. K. S. Joshi, APP for respondent State. ---- Coram : A.H. JOSHI, J. Date : 25th March, 2010. 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail 2. The applicants have been named as accused in Crime No.21/2010 under Section 306, 294 read with section 34 of the I.P.C. 3. Heard learned Advocate for the applicant and learned APP for respondent State. 4. The Investigating Officer has recorded the statements of various witnesses and atleast 3 witnesses narrated the incident of quarrel by accused persons with deceased Shobha. At this stage, accepting the every 2 sentence contained in the statement of the witnesses to represent the facts and truth alone, the version of the witnesses undoubtedly disclosed the intimidation. The act of abatement of suicide by way of instigation is not prima facie disclosed much less adequately described. 5. In this situation, the version of these witnesses do not inadequately describe the ingredients required for commission of abatement. 6. In this background, at this stage, this Court prima facie considers that the accused may not be involved in the offence of abatement of suicide. 7. In the result, the applicants are entitled to be released on bail. 8. In the event of arrest, the applicant be released on furnishing personal bond and solvent surety in a sum of Rs.10,000/- each. Judge |mule| 3