1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1069 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 352 OF 1994 Metaoxide Private Limited .. Plaintiff Vs Hill Properties Ltd and Ors .. Defendants And Standard Chartered Bank .. Respondent Mr. Anil D'Souza for the plaintiff Mr. Biren Saraf i/b M/s. M.K. Ambalal & Co for the respondent Mr. Mahesh Deval a/w C.D. Patel i/b M/s. Craw Bayley & Co for defendant no. 1 CORAM : R.V. MORE, J. DATE : 20th November, 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the plaintiff, defendant no. 1 and respondent / proposed defendant no. 4. 2. The chamber summons is taken out for leave to amend the plaint in terms of schedule attached to the chamber summons. RMA chs1069-09.sxw 2 3. The learned counsel for the plaintiff, at the outset, makes a statement that the plaintiff does not press the prayer clauses A-5 and A-7 on page nos. 4 and 5 of the schedule respectively. So far as the rest of amendment is concerned, Mr. Saraf, learned counsel for the respondent / proposed defendant no. 4 has no objection. In that view of the matter and for the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of chamber summons, the chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer (a) except the bracketed portion on page nos. 4 and 5 of the schedule respectively. 4. The plaintiff shall carry out amendment within the period of two weeks and thereafter to serve the amended copy of the plaint on the defendants within the further period of two weeks. 5. Needless to mention that the defendants are at liberty to file additional written statement / written statement within the period of six weeks from service of amended copy of the plaint. (R.V. MORE, J) RMA chs1069-09.sxw 3 RMA chs1069-09.sxw