C^^ 1<3-Z^> 6S©1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S)No. L/6^2- /2011 PETITIONER .x^$< ^^ T^'''^' ^y.- '^•••"" ^>W-T-t> ./-^•^ Sushila Vaishnav W/o.- Shri T.D. Vaishnav, Aged about 59 years, R/o Head Master Primary School, Katalwahi, Block Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS KS RESPONDENTS : 1) State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2) District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon Disfrict Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^ 3) Block Development Officer Dongargarh District-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER_ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. RESPONDENTS Sushila Vaishnav State ofC.G. & Others WRIT PiGTmON USDER ARTICLS 226/227 Oi' THE CONSriTUTIOS Or Shri Anup Majiuadar, Shri Praveea Das, Dy. G. forthe . for fhe State C-ounsel appearm.g for the petitioner siibiiiits that Uie issue iavolved iu the case is as to whether the petitioner is entilied to nsgular pay scaie w.e.f. tlie date of ic.itial appomtment or sftcr coiapletioii ofprobation period. The issue involved herein, was coiisidered by fhe SStiShya. Presdesh SState Admin.istraKve Others), wlisrein. it was held ftiat fhe similai-ly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date ofuiirial appoiutment. The iaatt.er was takea iip to the HonTale Suprenie Gourt. T.he appeal wss disuussed by ffae HonTs-le Supreine Court upholdiitg the decision •of the Tribunal to fhe effect fhat the Teachers/Assistaiit Teacbers are eiitifled to regular pay scale froiE, fhe date ofmitial appointnient. Counsel appearing for the petitioiier fiirther subiaits taat tliis Court, while cOBsidering fhe sam.e issus in Paras Ifc^h Gtipta Vs. Stcte of ChheitGsgeirh & Others (Vt'.P.(S). dated 15.1.2007, tias granted icgular pay scale w.e.f, the datc of initial appoiataient. .f -f ..,--ig*&> 1 /(.' ^ 6 Considenag fhe above factual and legal position the present petition is disposed of with a direction to fhe petitioner to approach fhe resp. No.2 by filiag i^presentation withia. tbree weeks and in -tbe eveataalily of filin.g aay such representa.tion the authority concemed would decide the sa.'me in accordance with law as expeditiouslv as possible. It is inade clear fhat this Court has n.0t expressed a-ny opuiion on laerits offhe case and the authority conceiTied would be at liberty to decide fhe representation ofthe petttioaer in. accordauce wit]i law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker ,^