IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 22ND DECEMBER 2011 / 1ST POUSHA 1933 WP(C).No. 34656 of 2011(F) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- 1. MOHAMMED RISHAD K.V., AGED 22 YEARS, FATHIMA MANZIL, KANNANCHERY, KALLAI P.O., KOZHIKODE. 2. MULLOT SURABHI JAYARAM, AGED 23 YEARS, LH1-KMCT ENGINEERING COLLEGE, KALANTHODE, MANASSERY P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. ZANEESHA ASHRAF, AGED 23 YEARS, DAMAN, M.T. MUSTHAFA ROAD, CHIRAKKAL KULAM, KANNUR DISTRICT. 4. HARISH R., AGED 23 YEARS, SREE HARI, BADIRA NILAM PARAMBA, KALLAI P.O., KOZHIKODE. 5. RIDIN N.K., AGED 24 YEARS, RIDHU NIVAS, VALIYAVALAPPIL,' NALLALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE. 6. BINAY CHANDRAN, AGED 23 YEARS, 4/4, ESI QUARTERS, ESI HOSPITAL COMPOUND, FERODE, KOZHIKODE. 7. JISHNU S., AGED 23 YEARS, NADALAKKAL HOUSE, MANNAR P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 8. KIRAN KUMAR S., AGED 24 YEARS, CHANDRAVILAS, AMBALATHUMBHAGAM P.O., PORUVAZHI, KOLLAM DISTRICT. Contd.........2 -:2:- WPC NO. 34656/2011 9. RAHIL C., AGED 24 YEARS, KAAVAI HOUSE, KANHANGAD P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 10. DIBIN C., AGED 24 YEARS, VINAYAM, MOTTAMMEL P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. 11. RAJEEV R., AGED 23 YEARS, THALIYADIL HOUSE, MUHAMMA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, 12. ARJUN K.V., AGED 24 YEARS, THIRUVONAM, MALAYAMMA P.O., NIT, KOZHIKODE. 13. ARJUN PRIDHVIJITH, AGED 24 YEARS, MARUTHANMAKKAL HOUSE, 10TH MILE, KUNNAMANGALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.S.K.SAJU SRI.A.RANJITH NARAYANAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 673 635. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673 635. BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC FOR UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: SD WPC NO. 34656/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS P1a COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 09.12.2011 FOR RE-VALUATION / SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY 1ST PETITIONER P1b COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 09.12.2011 FOR RE-VALUATION / SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER P1c COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 09.12.2011 FOR RE-VALUATION / SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER P1d COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 09.12.2011 FOR RE-VALUATION / SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER P1e COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 09.12.2011 FOR RE-VALUATION / SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 5TH PETITIONER P1f COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 09.12.2011 FOR RE-VALUATION / SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 6TH PETITIONER P1g COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 09.12.2011 FOR RE-VALUATION / SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 7TH PETITIONER P1h COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 09.12.2011 FOR RE-VALUATION / SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 8TH PETITIONER P1i COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 09.12.2011 FOR RE-VALUATION / SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 9TH PETITIONER P1j COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 09.12.2011 FOR RE-VALUATION / SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 10TH PETITIONER P1k COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 09.12.2011 FOR RE-VALUATION / SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 11TH PETITIONER Contd...............2 -:2:- WPC NO. 34656/2011 P1l COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 09.12.2011 FOR RE-VALUATION / SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 12TH PETITIONER P1m COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 09.12.2011 FOR RE-VALUATION / SCRUTINY ALONG WITH CHALLAN RECEIPTS SUBMITTED BY THE 13TH PETITIONER RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE SD ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).34656/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of certain papers in the 3rd and 5th semester B.Tech Examination vide Ext.P1(a) to P1(m) and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within six weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs