IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7005 of 2010 KRISHNA SINGH S/O LATE BAKHORI SINGH R/O BAHADURPUR, P.S.- BAHADURPUR, DISTT.- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. KUMAR MITHLESH PRASAD SINGH, CIRCLE OFFICER, PATNA SADAR, PATNA 3. MR. RAM PRIT PASWAN S/O NOT KNOWN OFFICE PEON 4. MR. RAJEEV, KARAMCHARI CIRCLE OFFICER, SADAR PATNA 5. SMT. SAKUNTALA DEVI W/O LATE AJAY KUMAR SINGH R/O BAHADURPUR, P.S.- BAHADURPUR, DISTT.- PATNA 6. SMT. SUMITRA KUMARI D/O LATE AJAY KUMAR SINGH AND W/O ABHISHEK KUMAR SINGH R/O MARGHAULI, P.S.- AURANGABAD, DISTT.- AURANGABAD 7. MR. RAM BRIKSH YADAV S/O LATE BHAGERAN YADAV R/O DAUD BIGHA, P.S. AGAM KUAN, DISTT.- PATNA 8. MR. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH S/O LATE RAM BALI SINGH R/O BAHADURPUR, P.S. BAHADURPUR, DISTT.- PATNA ----------- 02. 30.04.2010 Sri Prem Kumar Verma is allowed to appear on behalf of Sri Shambhu Prasad, who has gone to Chenai in connection with his eye treatment. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 3. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order of the Circle Officer, Patna Sadar dated 18.7.2009, Annexure-1, whereunder he has allowed the mutation of the lands in question in favour of private respondents ignoring the report of the Halka Karmchari and the Circle Inspector, Patna Sadar. 4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that that from the report of the Halka Karmchari and the Circle Inspector, Patna Sadar itself it will appear that Jamabandi of the lands in question is already existing in the name of the petitioner but without considering the same new jamabandi in favour of private respondents has been created on the basis of the sale deed, which was never executed by the petitioner. - 2 - 5. Let petitioner challenge the impugned order of the Circle Officer, Patna Sadar dated 18.7.2009, Annexure-1 before the Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Patna Sadar in the light of the provisions contained in the Bihar Tenants Holdings(Maintenance of Records) Act, 1973. Delay in filing the appeal be condoned, provided the same is filed within 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the same be disposed of as early as possible, in any case within three months from the date of receipt of the memo of appeal before the DCLR. 6. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)