^r HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON f8> N6. 4037 of2009 <~ /\smt PETmONER : U.N.Shukla S/Q Late Shri R.L.Shukla Age about 59 years, Woriking in Police Department as D8P, presently posting at Police Line, Raipur, R^ Post Bagbahara, Shukla Bada MainRoad, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarii Through its Secretary, Hoine (Policel) Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Building, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Iiispector General of Police (Admimstration) Police head Quarter, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. Director General of Police, Police Headquartei-s, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Deputy Inspector General of PoHce, Police Headquarter, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 5. SuperintendentofPolice,Raipur(C.G.) WRFT PETmON U/A 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K.Asiuhotri, J. Present: Shri Yogesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri Y.S.Tliakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondents. ORDERrORALY (Passed on 06th day of August, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on mstmctions, submits tliat the petitioner does.not want to contest this petition cn merits at Ihis stage, however, the respondent authorities may kindly be directed to consider and decide his representation dated 27.06.2009 (Annexure P/6), as expeditiously as possible. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits the pending representation as stated above, will be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period ofthree weeks from the date of receipt ofacopy ofthis order. 3. In view of above submission,.according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing sur^ives for adjudication m this petition. 4. Consequently, the writ petition stands disposedof SatisbK.W"*100"1 Judge