/ >*a»«s»*" IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.No. /^~<^3 /2006 ^fejfi! P E PETITIONER i^::^ Kanti Sharma W/o Late Shri ..••'./ .. *» ..••""'A^''''" . Ashok Sharma aged about 36 »*" A fr~.'*' .+' fV^'...^.^"' ..-• N^glp^/--'" <A® ^tf^" RESPONDENTS years, R/o Shanti Nagar ward Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar, (C.G.) VERSUS 1. ^ ^A'^?1 ••••••" ^ !i 'i.-^ :i"" fff 's'' ^' /ii?;^' '-;-••.'.'•' \:..-.L " ^., v:,,^-"' ^ ^ <> State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary and mmistry of SC./ST 8s OBC Development department DKS Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Commissioner, ST/SC & OBC -£• Developinent, Dept. Ravishankar University Campus Raipur (C.G.) Collector Distt. Dentewada, C.G. Asstt. Commissioner, Tribal Development Dentewada, Distt. Dantewada, C.G.) Asst. Commissioner, Tribal Development Jagdalpur, Distt. Dantewada (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .^.. / .-tf ... /•' Amit 3^ '^l<11CtAI, »tl)-M'IS, ^Miyy ...l£X.^o<-. 3n^TT?RT ^I^ICT^I ^i<-(^ "^ fs11€) <Pn^R (SB: Hon'ble Shri Pritinker DIw 28.08.2009 Grkde Shri Ashok K. Shukla, Ad( Shri Pankaj Shrivasta|i State/repondents. Contention of Shri Shukl that the respondent No. 3, i..ej sent a proposal recommendin^ appointing her as Assistant pending before the Commissioi|ier Raipur. Thus, at this stage, fh^ withdraw this petition with Ubei competent authority. Accordingly, fhe petition the aforesaid liberty. However, i| petitioner would be considered accordance with law, as (^ocate for the petitioner. (va, Panel Lawyer for the [a, counsel for the petitioner is the Collector, Dantewada has the case of the petitioner for III and the said proposal is ', Tribal Welfare Department, petitioner may be permitted to }ty to pursue her case before the expedit(ously ker, J.) is dismissed as withdrawn with : is expected that the case ofthe \)y the respondent-aufhorities in as possible. c^., Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge k