IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No. 810 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: 17.03.2010. Vikas. ...... PETITIONER Versus Sunita and another. ...... RESPONDENTS CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Gourav Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. *** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present revision petition has been filed under Section 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure against order dated 11.02.2010 passed by Sub Division Judicial Magistrate, Tohana, Annexure P1, vide which evidence of petitioner-husband was closed in proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. instituted by respondent-wife against the present petitioner. I have heard learned counsel for the revision petitioner and have gone through the whole record. It has been argued by learned counsel for the revision petitioner that he is totally blind and hence he is having 100% permanent disability and that in this regard certificate dated 13.08.2008 has been issued by Medical Board, Panipat. He has further contended that petitioner wants to summon CRR No.810 of 2010 the record and the concerned Doctor only, to prove the said certificate, which is very essential for decision of the present proceedings pending against him. Hence, it is contended that only one opportunity be given to the present revision petitioner to conclude his evidence. Hence, in view of these facts, the impugned order dated 11.02.2010 closing the evidence of present revision petitioner, Annexure P1, passed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Tohana, is set aside. Learned trial Court is directed to give one effective opportunity to the present petitioner to examine concern Clerk and the Medical Officer to prove Disability Certificate regarding blindness. However, revision petitioner is burdened with cost of Rs.500/-. The present revision petition is disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) March 17, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2