-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1181 of 2005 Shri.Kalyanrao Vasantrao Kale and Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. Balasaheb Vamanrao Deshmukh and Ors. ..Respondents .... Mr.C.J.Sawant Senior Counsel with Mr.A.S.Desai for Petitioners Mr.Vineet B.Naik for Respondent No.1 Mr.A.H.Palekar AGP for Respondent Nos.2 to 5 .... CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. DATE : APRIL 1,2005 DATE : APRIL 1,2005 DATE : APRIL 1,2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr.Savant, the learned Senior Counsel with Mr.A.S.Desai for the Petitioners, Mr.Naik for Respondent No.1 and Mr.Palekar AGP for State Govt. 2. This petition was admitted by order dated 7.3.2005 and while adjourning the petition for two weeks, it was clarified that it could be disposed of finally on the next date. 3. It is now stated that the meeting scheduled to discuss the no confidence motion on 7.3.2005, could not be held for whatever reasons and at the same -2- time, the Revision Application moved by the Respondents is still pending before the State Govt. 4. Under the circumstances, it would be expedient that the petition is disposed of by directing the hearing of the Revision Application to be completed within a fixed period. 5. It is accordingly directed that the pending Revision Application filed by Mr.Balasaheb Desmukh, be heard and decided on its own merits and after hearing all the parties concerned as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months. Until the Revision Application is decided, the interim order passed in the Revision Application shall not be operative. 6. Writ Petition is disposed of in the above terms. 7. It is clarified that this order of disposal of the Petition will not come in the way of the Petitioners to take out a fresh Application for no confidence motion. 8. Civil Application No. 730 of 2005 does not survive and is disposed of as such. -3- [ B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. ]