1 CR.APL NO.525/2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 7. APPLN/525/2011 BHARAT LIMBAJI KAKADE [Criminal] V/S THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.S.Thombre, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. V.H.Dighe, APP for State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 15-2-2011 1. Heard. In the night intervening 25th June 2010 and 26th June, 2010, a TATA-SUMO vehicle with registration No.MH-24-C 8938, with its particulars, was removed near or from the House of one Shaikh Habib for which offense vide Crime No.95/2010, under Section 379 of IPC was registered. 2. During the course of investigation, Police received message that the vehicle was found in other State and, consequently, the complainant was called, he verified the vehicle. By that time the vehicle had changed hands at least by three persons, using fabricated documents with the Transport Authorities for 2 CR.APL NO.525/2011 effecting transfer. The arrested suspect has disclosed name of the accused/applicant as accomplice. The specimen handwriting of the accused/applicant is imperative to be taken as several documents furnished to the Regional Transport Authorities, at least at three places, are to be examined. Learned A.P.P. submits that there are several cases in the area in which thefts of vehicles are involved and offenses are registered against unknown persons. 3. Interrogation is essential to know his nexus with the said crime. I see substance in submission for not enlarging the accused on bail. Hence, application lacks merit, rejected. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/525-11crapl