1 ABA-372 & 409-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.372 OF 2011 {For Anticipatory Bail} Nagnath Ambadas Mandlik .... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Shri V.V. Purwant for the Applicant. Ms Alpa T. Javeri, APP, for the State. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.409 OF 2011 {For Anticipatory Bail} {Production Matter} Sripad Vithalrao Ghodake .... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Shri P.G. Sarda for the Applicant. Ms Alpa T. Javeri, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: MAY 04, 2011 P.C: 1. These are applications for anticipatory bail by the applicants who had taken a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- from the first 2 ABA-372 & 409-11 informant for getting a job for his son. Instead of a job, the amount was refunded by cheques, which bounced. The learned counsel for the respective applicants state that the applicants would deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each with the trial Court within a period of two weeks without prejudice to their rights to raise appropriate defence. In view of this, the applicants being in custody for the purpose of further investigation may not be necessary. Hence, in the event of the applicants' arrest in C.R. No.89 of 2011 of Faujdar Chavdi Police Station, District Solapur, the applicants be released on bail on their furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs. 50,000/- per person on the condition that the applicants shall report at the police station concerned on 11-5-2011 at 11:00 a.m. for interrogation and thereafter as and when required by the I.O.. The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and they shall not leave the country without the prior permission of the trial Court. 3 ABA-372 & 409-11 2. The applicants shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each with the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Solapur, within a period of two weeks, which amount the learned Magistrate shall invest in maximum interest earning fixed deposit in State Bank of India and shall deal with the amount at the end of the trial, as per the result of the case. If the applicants fail to deposit the amount within the time stipulated, this order shall stand revoked without reference to the Court. 3. This order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge-sheeted, the applicants may furnish fresh bond before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court, dated 2-12-2010, delivered in Criminal Appeal No.2271 of 2010, arising out of SLP (Cri.) No. 7615 of 2009 {Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.}. 4. The applications accordingly stand disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)