IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 23492 of 1995 Between: 1.. V.R.K. Raju, S/o. Late Surapa Raju, R/o.MIG-2 F-11/B12, Baglingampally, Hyderabad. 2..M/S. Divya chit Fund Pvt. Ltd., H No. MIG-2 F-11/B12, Baglingampally, Hyderabad. Rep. by its Managing Director, Sri V.R.K.Raju …..PETITIONER(S) AND 1 District Consumers Disputes Redressal Forum, Hyderabad District, Opp: Anand Cinema, Secunderabad. 2 P-V. Manjunath, S/o. not known R/o. 49-2RT, Prakashnagar, Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, Puranahaveli, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to call for the records relating to I.A.No1108 of 1994 in C.D.No.204 of 93 and C.D.No.204/93 dated 23-3-1995 and 15-10-1994 of the District Forum, Hyderabad, and issue appropriate Writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of a Writ o Certiorari quashing the orders in I.A.No.1108/94 in C.D.No.204/93 dt.23-3-1995 and 15-10-94 of the 1st respondent as illegal and unconstitutional. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.CH.V.SURYANARAYANA MURTHY (not present) Counsel for the Respondent No 1 and 3 .: GP FOR HOME Counsel for respondent No. 2 : Mr. T.SANJAY RAO, Advocate The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO. 23492 OF 1994 The present writ petition is filed seeking the following relief: “…please to call for the records relating to I.A.No.1108 of 1994 in C.D.No.204 of 1993 and C.D.No.204 of 1993 dated 23-3-1995 and 15-10-94 of the District Forum, Hyderabad and issue appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly in the nature of a writ of certiorari, quashing the orders in I.A.No.1108 of 94 and C.D.No.204 of 93 dated 23-3-1995 and 15-10-94 of the first respondent duly declaring section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act as unconstitutional and violative of petitioner’s fundamental rights …..” Learned counsel for petitioner called absent. Heard learned Government Pleader for Home. The present writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in W.P.23491 of 1995 dated 31-8-2004. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed in terms of orders passed in W.P.23491 of 1995 dated 31-8-2004. No costs. ____________ N.V.RAMANA,J 31-8-2004 TVK To 1 District Consumers Disputes Redressal Forum, Hyderabad District, Opp: Anand Cinema, Secunderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, Puranahaveli, Hyderabad. 3. .2CCs to G.P. for Home, High Court buildings, Hyderabad 4..2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RAGHU} THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 23492 of 1995 Date: 31-8-2004