IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 9533 of 2008 Decided on: 14.12.2010 Som Dutt …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : It is jointly represented by the parties that the present lis is covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Uma Dutt Sharma versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another, Latest HLJ 2009 (HP) 1268. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of petitioner strictly in view of the principles laid down in the judgment cited hereinabove by counting the tenure/adhoc service followed by regularization for the purpose of increments/retiral benefits, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge December 14, 2010 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? (K. Attri)