1 FARHAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3421 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. S.P. Joshi Advocate h/f. Shri. P.R. Kulkarni, Advocate for petitioner. Shri. Alok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of Union of India. CORAM: V.C. DAGA & A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATED: 17th JULY 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The solitary contention raised in this petition is that the Enquiry Officer has not signed the enquiry report. This contention was never taken by the petitioner before the appellate authority. For the first time, this contention is raised in this writ petition. The contention raised by the petitioner is disputed question of fact. This issue could have been examined by the appellate authority. Apart from this, no arguments on the demerits of the enquiry and punishment has been raised. 2 3. In this view of the matter, no case is made out by the petitioner to entertain this petition. The petition is dismissed in liminie with no order as to costs. [A.V. POTDAR, J.] [ V.C. DAGA, J.] ssc/wp3421.09