1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1891 OF 2008 Sadanand Dhondu Mangaonkar & ors .......Petitioner versus Smt. Sarika Prashant Mangaonkar & ors........ Respondant. Mr. A.S. Rao for the Petitioner Mrs. A.S. Pai APP for State. CORAM: S. B. MHASE & R. V. MORE, JJ. DATED: 14th OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard. The learned APP makes a statement on instructions that the crime has been investigated and the charge sheet has been filed on 6-2-2008. She further makes a statement that after filing of the charge sheet the charge has been framed. Therefore the petition which is filed for quashing the FIR is not sustainable in law. Hence it is rejected. All points raised in this petition are kept open by way of defence if the petitioner desires to raise the same in the trial. Petition is disposed of. S. B. MHASE, J. R. V. MORE, J. 2