IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NOS NO.177 OF 1996 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 64 of 2003 L & T Finance Ltd. .. Applicant versus F.A. And Master Associates .. Respondent ... Ms.Shakuntala Joshi for the petitioner. Mr.A.M. Saraogi for the respondent. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK,J. DATED : 15th February 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. By this Chamber Summons, petitioner seeks extension of time for deposit of money. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent strongly opposes the request. She submits that the time was fixed by consent terms. Any extension of time amounts to a modification of the consent terms to which respondent is not agreeable. In my view, since the time was fixed by consent terms, it cannot be extended without the consent of other side. Hence chamber summons is dismissed. D.G. KARNIK, J