1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4050/2007 Kudan Mal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : - 11.7.2007 HON'BLE MR.PRAKASH TATIA,J. Mr.BR Mehta, for the petitioners. Mr.Sudhir Sharma, for the respondent no.3. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner claimed himself to be the opposition leader in the Municipal Council, Sheoganj. According to him, the Council is not taking action in the matter of recovery on the basis of some audit report. The audit report by which it has been observed that some amount of market rate is required to be recovered from the private respondent no.3. The facts of the case are that respondent no.3 applied for conversion of land, which was allowed by the order of the State dated 7th Oct., 2004. Thereafter, the land was converted for residential purposes by order of the State Government dated 2nd Nov., 2004. The petitioner being member of the Council could have taken appropriate steps by moving motion in the Council's meeting itself and could have complain for not taking action in accordance with 2 the audit objections, but here in this case, I do not find any reason to entertain the writ petition on this count. A private individual who has raised grievance against one private individual and that too, in a matter where the conversion orders were passed by the competent authority on behalf of the State Government. The writ petition of the petitioner is, therefore, dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-