IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2009 / 14TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 15414 of 2009(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------- 1. PAUL T.KURIAN, S/O.LATE T.E.KURIAKOSE, THURUTHUMMEL HOUSE, VADACODE P.O., KANGARAPADY, KOCHI-682 021. 2. SUNIL.K.R., S/O.RAGHAVAN, KARIPPUMOOLAYIL HOUSE, THRIKKAKARA P.O., KOLLAMKUDIMUGAL. 3. P.K.SURESH, S/O.KRISHNANKUTTY, PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, VADACODE P.O., KANGARAPADY, KOCHI-682 021. BY ADV. SRI.SAIBY JOSE KIDANGOOR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THRIKKAKARA SOUTH VILLAGE, THRIKKAKARA. WP(C).No. 15414 of 2009 :: 2 :: 5. THRIKKAKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, THRIKKAKKARA. 6. LALY C.GEORGE, W/O.SANI FRANCIS, KATHRUKUDIYIL, KADAVOOR P.O., KADAVOOR. NOW RESIDING AT R M V ROAD, ELAMAKKARA P.O., KOCHI-682 026. 7. PRINCE J.VELLUKUNNEL, 6 B J M CASIL, ELAMKULAM VILLAGE, KALOOR P.O., KOCHI-682 017. NOW RESIDING AT EXPRESS TOWER, 17/D, KALOOR, KOCHI-682 017. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No.15414 of 2009 --------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioners are aggrieved by what they call as the unauthorised illegal conversion of paddy fields by respondents 6 and 7 in Vadacode and Kakkanad locality in Thrikkakkara South Village. It is pointed out that the paddy fields in question, which are subjected to unauthorised conversion is having an extent of 5 acres comprised in Survey No.674/6 and 674/6/2 of the Thrikkakkara South Village. Pointing out that there is illegal and unauthorised conversion, the petitioners have filed Ext.P2 representation before the 3rd respondent. They have filed this writ petition finding that there is delay on the part of the respondents in taking action. 2. I heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. The facts stated by the petitioner in Ext.P2 obviously is to be dealt with by the 3rd respondent. W.P.(C)No.15414 of 2009 :: 2 :: Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to look into Ext.P2 and take appropriate action, after notice to the opposite parties mentioned in Ext.P2 and any other affected person, within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- (V.GIRI) Judge sk/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge