C ^ O.€^f 7-— IN THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHAYTtlSCrARH AT BILASPUR PBTITIONERS W.P.tSl N0.|S)^1 / 2010 l." Smt. Lusia Kujur W/o P.C. Dehari, aged about 52 years, working as Head Master T.W.D. Primary School, Bartoli, (Kersai) Block- Pharshabahar, ^, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 6~ /' ^r /^ ,?1/y V <p ^y^.°N o<7^\^ ^^^ .^ ^'' rv <^- RESPONDENTS ^ 2.-Smt. Sumanti Minj W/o Shri Vijay Kumar Minj, aged about 43 years, working as Head Master T.W.D. Primaiy School, Pokhratoli (Singibahar) Block - Pharshabahar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VtR^US 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, Distt.- Jashpur (C.G.) <$) ^p ^ 3. Block Education Officer, Block -Pharshabahar Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 4. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account & Pension Jashpur, Distt.-Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TH^ CONSSTITUTION OF INDIA Amit -® HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIU\SPUR PETiTIONER RESPONDENTS WRI T PETITiON (Sj No. 1852 of 2010 : Smt Lusia Kujur & another VERSUS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRiT PETmON UNDER ARTiCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agn|hot!LA Present: Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 22nd day of Aprii, 2010) 1. By this petition, the petitioners seek a direction to the respondents to pay two advance increments on passing of B.TJ examination, on their own expenses, before entering into service. 2, Learned counse! appeanng for the petitioners submits that the issue invoived in the present case Is no tonger res fntegraBS the same has been considered and decided by the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena K State ofM.P. & Ors.as weli as by this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj K Munlcipai Corporation, Durg & anothe^ and Gopesh Kumar Verma K The Slate Govt of Chhattlsgarh and anothef. 3. Learned counsel further submits that the instant petitton is squarely covered by the decision as aforestated. Thus, the petitioners may be permitted to make representations to the respondent authorities to decide thelr cases for grant of two increments in the iight of aforeslated decision, subject to verification of the fact asto whether the petitioners have acquired B.TJ certjficate on their own expenses before entering into service. 4. Learned counsei appearing for the State/respondents submits that in the event, the petitioners make representations, the same will be considered and declded, in accordance with iaw and in the light ofthe decisions ofthe Supreme Court In As/ia Saxena (supra) as weil as this Court in Yashwant Kumar Bharacfwa/^n^ Gopesh Kumar Verma (supra), within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of tfie representatlon. 5. in view of foregoing, according to the tearned counse! appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition foradjudication. 6. Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of. 1-2009(ni)MPJR(SC)59 2 2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96 3WP(S)No.4130of2Q05 Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge