1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. REVIEW PETITION NO. 35 of 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders | Mr. K.M. Nagarkar, Adv. For applicant. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 18TH JUNE, 2010 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks review of the order dated 12th November, 2009. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only on account of some typographical error, the petition came to be dismissed and therefore, the order needs to be reviewed. 2. While dismissing the petition, I have observed that a party which comes to the court should come before the court with clean hands. It has been observed that perusal of the order impugned which was placed on record alongwith the original order, shows that the order placed on record gives a totally distorted picture as compared to the original order. 3. No error apparent on the face of the record is pointed out, so as to invoke the review jurisdiction. The review application is, therefore, rejected. (B.R.GAVAI,J.) grt / office /wp 2