7.x _' ’)Jf HIGH COURT OF Ci-EIEfAT'I‘ISGARH AT BELASPUR W Writ Petition N0. Z449 (£2994 years, S/o KL Gop, ‘R/o 63 PETITIGNER (Jtpal Gop @ Utpal Gope, agcd about 30 -A Indraprastha Nagar, Hausing Board Chhauni PO. Bhilai, Distt. Durg (CG). VERSUS . State Bank of India. threugh Assistant Generai Manager, Autmrities Otfmer, Bhilai Branch PO. Bhiiai, Durg Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh). 2.. Tahsiidar, Durg, PO. and Distt. ,Durg (CG). (WRIT PETETION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CGNSTITUTION OF HVDIA) (SB: Hall'bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) ’ Present : None f0} the petitioner. RESPONDENTS : l Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (yassw an 5‘“ {my a: Septembey, 2093) l. The maiier is calieti for hearing twice. On both occasicms, none appears ner any representatien is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may net be imerested in the matter. In View ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for Want ofprosecution. wakur sd/- _ smash K Agnihom Judge