- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.238 OF 2009 APPEAL NO.238 OF 2009 APPEAL NO.238 OF 2009 Ibrahim Multan Ansari ...Appellant vs. State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Ms Anjali Iyer for the appellant Ms A.T.Javeri A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : MARCH 23,2009 : MARCH 23,2009 : MARCH 23,2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. None appears for the appellant. The Appeal is by the accused no.3. By the impugned Judgment and Order all the three accused have been convicted for the offence under section 324 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code and they have been sentenced to suffer six months’ imprisonment. Perusal of the impugned Judgment and Order shows that the same has been delivered by the Assistant Sessions Judge. In view of sub sections 2 and 3 of section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973, Appeal is maintainable before the appropriate Sessions Court. Accordingly, the Registry is directed to return the Memorandum of appeal along with its accompaniments and bail application for presentation to the appropriate Sessions Court. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE