IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6988 of 2009 Date of decision : 15.2.2010 Pritam Singh ....Petitioner Versus Sajjan Singh ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Naresh Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner S. D. ANAND, J. A plea raised by the plaintiff-petitioner herein for the restraint of defendant-respondent from interfering in the former's possession on the property in suit did not find favour with the learned Trial Court and also the learned Ist Appellate Court. Both the Courts noticed that the only documentation relied upon by the petitioner herein is an agreement to sell which is not even averred to have been followed up by filing of a suit for specific performance; while the possessory title of the party opposite is buttressed by the registered sale deed dated 29.6.2007. For the very reasons noticed by both the Courts, the present is not a case where interference would be required in exercise of revisional jurisdiction particularly when both the Courts had taken a view based upon documentation relied upon by the parties to the cause. The petition shall stand dismissed in limine accordingly. February 15, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE