IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 4497 of 2009 Date of Decision: 11.8.2009 Bhajan Kaur ....Petitioner. Versus Sukhjant Singh and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. In this revision petition filed by the plaintiff-petitioner, prayer is for setting aside the order dated 23.7.2009 passed by the trial court whereby the application filed by her for leading additional evidence in the form of excerpt was dismissed. The trial court while rejecting the application of the petitioner for leading additional evidence has recorded that the evidence which the plaintiff wanted to adduce by way of additional evidence could have been led in her affirmative evidence. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. No explanation much less satisfactory one has been furnished by the learned counsel for not producing and proving the excerpt in the affirmative evidence of the plaintiff. Further, on a specific query put by the Court as to what excerpt is required to be proved, the learned counsel could not furnish any reply to the said query. No illegality or C.R. No. 4497 of 2009 -2- perversity could be pointed out in the order dated 23.7.2009 passed by the trial court which may call for interference by this Court in its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Dismissed. August 11, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE