IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No 1019 of 2008 BRAHMDEO MANDAL & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4 26.03.2009 By order dated 13.07.2007 passed in CWJC No 6331 of 2000, this Court had directed the petitioners to take steps for substitution of respondent No 27 and it was ordered that failing which the writ petition would stand dismissed. It was obviously an order recorded by inadvertence. Failure to substitute respondent No 27 would at best result in dismissal of the writ petition as against the said respondent but not the writ petition as a whole. In that view of the matter, for the reasons stated in the restoration application, the same is allowed and CWJC No 6331 of 2000 is restored to its original file but as petitioner has not taken steps for substitution of respondent No 27, the writ petition, as against respondent No 27, shall stand dismissed. M.E.H./ (Navaniti Prasad Singh)