IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5096 of 2010 BETWEEN Ravi Raghuramaiah. ... PETITIONER AND Puli Sudhakar and three others. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. G. SRAVAN Counsel for the Respondents: MR. T.C. KRISHNAN The Court made the following order: ORDER: This civil revision petition is filed against the order dated 17.09.2010 passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kovur, in O.S.No.181 of 2003 upholding the objection raised by the respondents/defendants in the suit for marking certain adangals. 2. At the stage of marking of certain adangals, on behalf of the petitioner/plaintiff, the said documents were allowed to be marked subject to objection. It is the objection of the respondents/defendants that the said documents were not counter signed by the Mandal Revenue Officer and that they are not certified copies. However, it is the case of the petitioner that such attestation is not necessary in view of the amended provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattedar Passbooks Act, 1971. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. T.C. Krishnan, learned counsel for the respondent. 4. As the documents are already marked subject to objection, there is no reason to discard such documents at this point of time. Whether such attestation is necessary or not is a matter, which can be considered at the time of final hearing of the suit. However, it is open to the respondents to advance such argument for adjudication at the time of final hearing, but the same cannot be allowed to be sustained at this point of time. 5. For the aforesaid reasons, I deem it appropriate to set aside the order dated 17.09.2010 and direct the Court below to allow the respondents/defendants to raise such objection at the stage of final hearing of the suit and if such objection is raised, the trial Court shall decide the same along with the other issues. With the above directions, the civil revision petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J June 13, 2011 DSK