IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33160 of 2010 RAJENDRA MAHTO, S/o Late Briksha Mahto. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 04.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased and It is not a case under Section 304B IPC which would raise presumption against the in-laws, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of 2nd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Purnea in connection with S.Tr. No. 935 of 2009/398 of 2010 arising out of Angarh P.S. Case No. 07 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)