IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.DENESAN THURSDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2006 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 WP(C).No. 34092 of 2006(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ C.P. VENUGOPALAN, AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, ALAYAMON, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.BHAGAVAT SINGH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, DIRECTORATE OF AGRICULTURE, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER MR. BIJOY CHANDRAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.K.DENESAN, J. ----------------------------- WP(C)No. 34092 OF 2006 ----------------------------- Dated this the 21st December, 2006. JUDGMENT As per Ext.P1 judgment dated 4.8.2006 this Court directed the second respondent to consider the appeal filed by the petitioner and to take decision in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, in any event, before 30.11.2006. This writ petition has been filed by the same petitioner seeking for orders to keep the recovery proceedings in abeyance on the ground that application filed before the respondents praying for the very same relief has not been considered. 2. Govt. Pleader submits that there is no question of any interim application being considered by the Government at this stage because the appeal filed by the petitioner stands already disposed of. Counsel for the petitioner submits that no such order has been communicated to the petitioner. Govt. Pleader then submits that he has requested the Government to make available to the petitioner a copy of the order passed by the Government by fax. 3. In the above circumstances this writ petition is disposed of as infructuous, without prejudice to the right WPC 34092/2006 2 of the petitioner to challenge the order passed pursuant to Ext.P1 judgment if he feels so and if so advised. K.K.DENESAN Judge jj