IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 6174 of 2008. Decided on: 31.08.2010. __________________________________________________________ Jeet Ram. … Petitioner. Versus Himachal Pradesh Housing and Urban Development Authority and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Surinder Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Subhash Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. V.D. Khidta, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): In sequel to order dated 23.08.2010, Mr. V.D. Khidta, learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 has produced the record. It is evident from the record that the petitioner had not been supplied the copy of inquiry report dated 9th September, 1997 (Annexure R-7). It was necessary for the employer to supply copy of the inquiry report to enable the petitioner to rebut the same. Consequently, in these circumstances, Annexure A-5, dated 7th August, 1998 is quashed and set aside. Respondents are directed to supply the copy of inquiry report to the petitioner to enable him to file reply to the same and thereafter the matter will be considered in accordance with law. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 2. In view of the above observations/directions, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. There shall be no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 31, 2010. (sck).