1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9303/2008 Lalita Kumari v. State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of Order :: 16 th December, 2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. S.N.Trivedi, for the petitioner. .... The petitioner claiming herself an adopted daughter of Late Shri Dilip Kumar who died while in service on 12.10.1990 claimed appointment on compassionate grounds. At the time of death of Late Shri Dilip Kumar the petitioner was minor, therefore, an application seeking appointment on compassionate grounds was submitted by her after attaining majority. The application aforesaid came to be rejected and being aggrieved by the same she preferred a petition for writ before this Court and that came to be rejected on 22.11.2004. While rejecting an appeal against the order dated 22.11.2004, learned Division Bench of this Court observed that if the Rules of the Rajasthan Sheep & Wool Cooperative Federation permits consideration for application of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds, her case may be considered sympathetically. By a communication dated 9.3.2005 the Deputy Director (Establishment), Directorate of Animal Husbandry, communicated to the 2 petitioner that there was no provision for appointment on compassionate grounds in the Rajasthan Sheep & Wool Cooperative Federation and, therefore, no appointment can be given to her as claimed. To challenge the decision aforesaid, this petition for writ is preferred. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the Rajasthan Sheep & Wool Cooperative Federation has already been liquidated and, therefore, now it is the responsibility of the Directorate of Animal Husbandry to employ the petitioner on compassionate grounds. I do not find any merit in the argument advanced. As a matter of fact the claim of the petitioner regarding appointment on compassionate grounds was already negatived by the Federation much back in the year 2005 and the decision aforesaid stood affirmed by this Court. An observation was certainly given for the petitioner's candidature sympathetically but that is of no consequence, as there was no provision in the Rajasthan Sheep & Wool Federation for making appointment on compassionate grounds. The case of the petitioner was required to be considered as per the provisions of the Federation and not as per the provisions applicable for government servants. As such there is no question of giving appointment to the petitioner as claimed. 3 Accordingly, the petition for writ is dismissed. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. kkm/ps.