IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated 10.3.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.5781 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 1. K.Gunasekaran 2. G.Thiyagarajan ... Petitioner -Vs.- 1.Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, represented by Chairman, Mount Road, Chennai-2. 2.The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Medavakkam Tank Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. 3.Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.110/33,Cooks Road, Otteri, Chennai-60012. ... Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to shift the Electricity Service Connection bearing No.146:012:135 and No.146:012:136 from the present position in premises No.72, Millers Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010 to the portion under the occupation of the petitioners in premises No.72, Milers Road, Kilpauk, Chennai- 600 010. For petitioner : Mr.P.Balakrishnan. For respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran. ----- O R D E R Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to shift the Electricity https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Service Connection bearing No.146:012:135 and No.146:012:136 from the present position in premises No.72, Millers Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010 to the portion under the occupation of the petitioners in premises No.72, Milers Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. 2. Mr.A.Selvendran, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents electricity board. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 3. Petitioner claims to be the owner of the Electricity Service Connection and has made a representation dated 14.10.2010 to the second respondent and another representation dated 13.1.2011 to the respondents 2 and 3 to shift the electricity service connection meter so as to enable to easy access for recording meter reading. 4. Mr.A.Selvendran, learned counsel appearing for the respondents states that if the claim of the petitioner has not been considered and disposed of so far, suitable direction may be given to the respondents 2 and 3 to consider and dispose of the representations on merits and in accordance with law. For such course of action, the petitioner has no objection. 5. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, the respondents 2 and 3 are directed to consider and dispose of the representations of the petitioner dated 14.10.2010 and 13.1.2011 on its own merits and in accordance with law, if it is otherwise in order within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Asst. Registrar //True Copy// Sub Asst. Registrar ts To 1.Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, represented by Chairman, Mount Road, Chennai-2. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Medavakkam Tank Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. 3.Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.110/33,Cooks Road, Otteri, Chennai-600 012. +1 CC to M/s.P.Balakrishnan, SR 17230. RV(CO) VS 06.04.2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/