IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 4309 of 2009 Between: Syed Shah Mohammed Hussaini S/o.Late Syed Shah Mohammed Moinuddin Hussaini R/o.H.No.5-5-102, Nampally,Hyderabad , AP Rep.by his GPA Mohd.Osman Qurashi,S/o.Mohd.Chand Quraishi aged about 38 years Occ:Business, R/o.H.No.16-5-189/1 Dabeerpura, Faratnagar, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The AP STate Wakf Board, rep.by its Chairman Razak Manzil, Public Garden Road, Nampally,Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad at Gachibowli Hyderabad, AP 3 Smt.Yousuf Begum W/o.Khasim Saheb 4 Azam Shareef S/o.Khasim Saheb 5 Mahamood Shareef S/o.Khasim Saheb Respondents 3 to 5 are resident of 4-25-32/2/1 Pahadi Hazarath Mir Momin Saheb, Rajendranagar, Ranga REddy District, AP .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No.1 to protect the land as it is mandatory and statutory obligation under the Wakf Act and Respondent No.2 be directed to provide police protection at the site of the petitioner, as petitioner apprehend interfering in the Wakf property by the Respondents No.3 to 5 their henchmen, agents, workers, in Survey No.318 admeasuring A.8.9 guntas and Survey No.317 admeasuring Ac.11.9 guntas situated at Attapur Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District AP. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MOHAMMAD ABDUL BASITH Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner stating that even though he made several complaints/representations to the 1st respondent-Wakf Board to protect his lands in S.Nos.317 and 318 admeasuring Ac.11.9 guntas and Ac.8.9 guntas respectively situated at Attapur Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, no action has been taken. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home. Pursuant to the notice issued by this Court on 4.3.2009, the Inspector of Police, Rajendranagar Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate has filed a counter affidavit on behalf of the 2nd respondent inter alia stating that no representation whatsoever has been received by them from the petitioner seeking police protection to the subject matter of lands and as and when they receive any application, the same will be considered in accordance with law. Except stating that no action has been taken on his complaints/representations, the petitioner has not placed before the court any acknowledgment or proof of receipt of his complaints by the 2nd respondent to substantiate his case that though he made several complaints, no action has been taken. In such view of the matter, the relief sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted. The writ petition is devoid of merit and it is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to make a complaint/representation to the respondents seeking protection to his lands and if any such complaint/representation is being made, the same shall be considered and appropriate action may be taken by the respondents in accordance with law. N.V.RAMANA,J Dt.18.3.2009 Msv.