1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 42 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Mr. V.J. Dixit, senior counsel holding for Mr. A.N. Nagargoje, Advocate for the appellant. CORAM : A.P. DESHPANDE & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 11th FEBRUARY, 2010. PER COURT : 1. This LPA is directed against the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge, rejecting the objection of the present appellant/petitioner, to the execution of the decree on the ground that as the encroached property is not identified and identifiable, the decree cannot be executed. 2. A similar objection was raised, which finally came to be a turned down by order dated 27th August, 2009, while dismissing LPA No. 82/2009 by the Division Bench of this court. The same objection is yet again being raked up in this LPA. 2 3. We have perused the order passed in LPA 82/2009, so also the impugned order passed in the Writ Petition. No interference with the impugned order is called for. Hence, the LPA is rejected. [N.D. DESHPANDE,J] [A.P. DESHPANDE,J.] grt/-