MW“ W/Oé/ IN THE NADHA Y ADE “AQNINISTRATIvE TRIBuNAL JABALpUR. 0.A. Na. Q “W OF 193. Cgn?mm‘ I¥6§/Oé‘ Virandra Kumar Pathak S/o V. Retirad Black Education Officer) 4/w K/D AppLIcnwT\: , @hnbamg Madhya Pradesh. %& 5%;ML aaw RESPONDENTS: 1; State cf Madhya Pradesh, through Sacrstary a? School Education, Bhopal& 2. Nadhya Pradesh, Bhepal 3o? DETAILS OF APPLIERTIUN : m.“ .‘ ¢ m Pathak, @uawbn;a«ukw§’ J - Versus ¢ Ayukta, Lok Shikshan Sanchalnalaya, o Joint Diractor, Lok ShikShan, Raipur Diyiaion, Raipur. pR 9 , Gowa'i HéGH CGT UR C3F CH%’4ATT3SGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PET5T§ON ($} NG.754 OF 2QG5 PETITIONER ‘alirendra Kumaa' Pathak Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & Others RESPONDENTS Single Bench : Han’bie Shri Sat%sh K. Agraihdcri J‘ Present :- Ncne fer éhe petiiionet Shri NN. Rav, PL far ihe State‘ ORBER (GRAL) {Passed en this 21 St day Qf October, 200$) The matter is caiied for hearing twice. Q1 both occasions. none appears rm is any representation made on behaif of the petitiener. The netitioner mav not be interested in the matter. ) in View of the above. ihe writ petitien is dismissed for want a?“ prosecuiion. Registry is aiirected to send a cepy cf thie arder i0 the petitioner fori‘hwith. Sd/- i Satish K. Agnihotri‘? Judge 2