x w...._ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 1274 of 2008 PETITIONERS : . Rajendra Kumar Sahu, Age about 42 years; Asstt. Teacher, S/o Shri Tirtho Ram Sahu, Middls School Bhukel Block Basna, Distt. Mahasamund (CG). . Smt. Lili Grcsh Ekka Age about 44 yeam, Asstt. Teacher W/o Shri Vimal Ekka Middla School Semariya Block Anlng Distt. Raipur (CG). . Deega Ram Verma Age about 55 years, Asstt. Teacher S/o Shri Ghinju Ram Vanna Middle Schooi Semariya Block Amng Distt. Raipur (CG). VERSUS LState Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department & Education Department, DKS Bhawan, DiStt. Raipur (CG) 2. Distt. Education Ohioer, Mahasamund/Raipur. RESyoNDENTs (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF 1m CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) LSB: Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Pres’ent : Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioners. ‘ Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. GRAL ORDER V . (Passed on 27m of February, 2008) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the Statex’respondents jointly submits that the fact and question of law involved / in the presem Writ Petitioli are the same to that of in Yashwant Kunmr Bhardwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Burg and another {200661) MPJR-CG96}, which has been disposed ofvide order dated 03.04.2006. 2. Accordingly, the writ'petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the , case of Yashwant Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the facts asto whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed Examination Certificate on their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.199S and 01.03.1999 and thither. whether they have been. paid two advance increments or not. No order asto costs. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2 3 EGH {fOURT OF CHHATTISilARH AT BILASPUR Waii Petitimi (S) No. 1274 of 203:? FET§T§GNERS : 1‘ Rajendm Kumar Sahu, Age about 42 years, Asstt. Teacher, S/o Shri Tirtho Ram Sahu‘; Middié Schoal Bhukcl Block Bas11a5 Digit. Mahasamund (CG). 2. Smt. Liii Grssh Ekka. Age about 44 ysars, Asstt. Teacher W/Q SlLTi Vimal Eldga Middle Sahuol Sgmariya Bimk Amng Distt Raipur (CG). 3. Desga Ram Vaima Age about 55 yeargg Asqff Teaahcir SR) Shri Ghinju Ram Vanna Middle SchOO‘: Semariya Biock Ajung DiSi‘t Raigtli‘ (CG\ VER§SU§4 RESE’GNBENTS 1. State Govi of Chimitisgai‘h Through Secretary, Tribai Welfare Deparnnem'. & Education Departmenn DKS Bhawam Distt. Raipur {CCQ 2. Distt. Educatian Officer, Mahasamund/Raipur. {WRIT PETmGN UNDER ARTICLE 226 GF THE CONSTITImON OF INDIA) (SB: Hm'bze Mr. Satieh K. Agimmtijz J.) Present : Shn' Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate f0r the petitienem, Sm‘i. Smite; Ghaj, Panel Lawyer for the Statefrespondenis. ORAL ORDER (?as5eil on 27m afFebi‘iiary, 2%8) I... e Leamed counsel. appearilig for Lhe petitiouerS as’ we“ as for {he State/respondems jGintly Sublm‘is i118? ‘ihe facrt and queStiml of law involved in the present Wri‘i Petitimi are tl‘e same $0 flint of in. Yaeliwant Kiwi . lim'ilwai Vs” Mimieipal ‘Caiimmliaii; lhnrg smai mother {2&€}6(H) w MPJR-CE96}, which has been disposed efvide order dated 63.04.2606 Accard'mgly, ihe writ peiition is allowed. in terms of the arder passed in the ease 0f Yashwam Kimmy Bhanhmj Vs. Municipgj Carpamtiom Burg and amather (Supra), subject t0 verifieation 0f the facts asto Whether the petitioners have aequired BEd Emminatim €ertificate on their own expenses as per the Circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 03.63.1999 and liuthez‘ whether they haVe beett- paid two advance itterements 0r 130i. NO order asto JL\‘ cogts. e i Sd/— V Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thalm: H