1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO: 1125/ 2007 { Sau. Kavita w/o Anil Bhoyar (ku.Kavita Namdev Chanap) vs. Shri Anil Ramkrishna Boyar) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders. .................................................................................................................................................................. Shri Atul S.Chandurkar, Adv. for petitioner; Respondent served. CORAM: A.H.JOSHI, J. DATED: 23rd November, 2007. *** This case is listed on Board for orders. Respondent is served. 2. Learned Advocate for applicant prays for taking up the petition for immediate hearing. 3. This Court finds that the averments contained in the petition reveal that the petitioner is residing at Wardha with her parents, and she has to maintain herself and the minor son on the support of the parents, which she denotes as mercy, and this version has gone unchallenged as respondent has not appeared to oppose 2 the petition. 4. The son of the applicant is prosecuting his education at Wardha. Even the applicant is prosecuting her studies in M.A. Part I in Lok Mahavidyalaya at Wardha. In these premises, prosecuting HMP at Achalpur is bound to be matter of grave inconvenience and expanse to the applicant as compared to the respondent. 5. In this situation, it goes without saying and is obvious from the facts that accepting the grounds stated in the petition, the application for transfer deserves to be allowed. 6. In the result, Miscellaneous Civil Application is allowed in terms of Prayer Clause (1). In the circumstances, parties shall bear own costs. JUDGE sahare