IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.23865 of 2010 RAJESH KUMAR SURAJ son of Harendra Sah Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 19.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner is the assailant of the injured and also that he remained absconding, whereas, the case of other co-accused was committed to the Court of Sessions, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer after framing of charge. The Magistrate concerned shall not bifurcate the case of the petitioner for commitment or framing of charge for reasons of this order. In case the petitioner is charged, the trial court will consider amalgamation of his trail with other co-accused, if convenient. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)