IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP-T No. 2925 of 2008 Date of decision: 11.07.2011 ________________________________________________________________ Dr. V.K. Rathee. .....Petitioner. Versus CSK H.P. Krishi Vishvavidyala & ors. .....Respondents. Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, J. 1 Whether approved for reporting? ________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Subhash Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Lokinder Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No. 1, 2 and 4. None for remaining respondent. V.K. Sharma, J. (Oral). In view of the statement at the bar made by Mr. Subhash Sharma, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner, that the relief claimed by the petitioner in the present petition has since been granted to him by respondent No. 1, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also pending CMP(s), if any. (V.K. Sharma) Judge 11th July, 2011 (virender) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?