1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4120 OF 2011 Mrs.Sweta Swapnil Chandurkar and anr. ..vs.. Nagpur Improvement Trust and ors. =-=-==-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. U.K.Bisen, Adv. for the petitioners. Mr. Samarth, Adv. for respondent no.1. C ORAM : D.D.SINHA AND A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : 9th NOVEMBER, 2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondent – N.I.T. The writ petition is directed against the communication dated 12/11/2010 issued by the Building Engineer, Nagpur Improvement Trust, whereby the petitioner was informed that his application for regularization of relevant plot and construction thereon of Mouza Dabha in the layout of Hill View Co-op Housing Society came to be rejected on the ground that there is a dispute in the Society. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to file a representation against the communication to the Chairman, Nagpur Improvement Trust within a period of two weeks. Mr.Samarth, learned 2 counsel for the Nagpur Improvement Trust has stated that if such representation is made, same would be considered in accordance with law and procedure applicable in this regard within period of four weeks. In view of this statement made by Mr. Samarth, nothing survives in the writ petition. The same is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE. chute