IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48856 of 2007 RAMESH RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 24.02.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 27.4.2007 summoning him under 319 Cr.P.C. in Sessions Trial No. 52 of 2003 by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-I, Buxar. The petitioner is a named accused in the First Information Report along with others. The allegations of assault are omnibus. That the informant may not have named him in his deposition during trial of no consequence in view of the fact that he has been named by other prosecution witnesses in their deposition and the court below has adequately discussed that aspect of the matter in the impugned order. Considering the entirety of the discussion, the seriousness of the allegations under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code this Court is not persuaded to interfere. The application is dismissed. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)