^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH: BILASPUR Wrlt.PettJon (Sl No.2795 of 2008 8. Ramswaroop Sahu, S/o Shri Amui Sahu, Aged about 31 years, Unemployed, Residing at: DONGARGARH, Dlstrict Rajnandgaon. Kailash Behra, S/o Late D. Behra, Aged about 34 years, Unemployed, Residing at: DONGARGARH, Djstrict Rajnandgaon. Anii Yadav, S/o Shri Mannuram Yadav, Aged about 42 years, Unempioyed, Residing at: DONGARGARH, District Rajnandgaon. Asim Tudu, S/o Shri Satish Tudu, Aged about 45 years, Unempioyed, Residing at: DONGARGARH, District Rajnandgaon. Mahendra Nayak, S/o Shri Rupa Nayak, Aged about 38 years, Unempioyed, Residing at: DONGARGARH, District Rajnandgaon. Ramkrishna Sonwane, S/o Shri Sevaram Sonwane, Aged about 35 years, Unemployed, Residing at: DONGARGARH, DJstrict Rajnandgaon. Dasrath, S/o Shri Punam, Aged about 42 years, Unemployed, Reslding at: DONGARGARH, District Rajnandgaon. Sanjay Lokhande, S/o Shri Bhoj Lokhande, Aged about 39 years, Unemployed, Resldtng at: DONGARGARH, District Rajnandgaon. 5:fc 9. Chotesab, S/o Shri Agnu, Aged about 40 years, Unemployed, Residing at: DONGARGARH, District Rajnandgaon. 10. Chandra Mohan Nayak, S/o Shri Pitamber Nayak, Aged about 32 years, Unempioyed, Residing at: DONGARGARH, District Rajnandgaon. 11. Ramesh Sahu, S/o Shri Mandrakhan Sahu, Aged about 42 years, Unempioyed, Residing at: DONGARGARH, District Rajnandgaon. 12. A. Govind Rao, Shri A. Kankam, Aged about 37 years, Unempioyed; Residing at: DONGARGARH, District Rajnandgaon. 13. Miiauram, S/o Shri Mansaram, Aged about 30 years, Unemployed, Residing at:DONGARGARH, District Rajnandgaon. 14. Ramdal Sao, S/o Shri Jwalaram, Aged about 34 years, Unemployed, Residing at: DONGARGARH, District Rajnandgaon. 15. Duiaroo Ram, S/o Shri Gopai Ram, Aged about 36 years, Unempioyed, Residing at: DONGARGARH, District Rajnandgaon. 16. Ram Kumar, S/o Shri Mohanlal, Aged about 31 years, UnempEoyed, Residing at: DONGARGARH, District Rajnandgaon. 17. Sadhoo Das, S/o Shri Bachooram, Aged about 32 years, Unemployed, Residing at: ^ ^ DONGARGARH, Rajnandgaon. District 1- 18. Kishore Kumar Sahu, S/o Shri Nandan Singh Sahu, Aged about 37 years, Unemptoyed, Residing at: DONGARGARH, District Rajnandgaon. 19. P. Rama Rao, S/o Shri Krishnamurty, Aged about 39 years, Unemployed, Residing at: DONGARGARH, District Rajnandgaon. 20. Sidharth Bagde, S/o Shri Krishnara Bagde, Aged about 35 years, Unempioyed, Residing at: DONGARGARH, DJstrict Rajnandgaon. 21. Govan Ram, S/o Shri Pasawram, Aged about 34 years, Unemployed, Residing at : DONGARGARH, District Rajnandgaon. 22. Ani! Kumar Yadav, S/o Shri Premsukh Yadav, Aged about 35 years, Unemptoyed, Residing at: DONGARGARH, District Rajnandgaon. 23. N. Kumar Sinha, S/o Shri Tarkeshwar Sinha, Aged about 29 years, Unemployed, Residing at: DONGARGARH, District Rajnandgaon. 24. Lekh Ram, S/o Shri Shankarial Bhedia, Aged about 31 years, Unemployed, Residing at: DONGARGARH, Djstrict Rajnandgaon. RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. Union of india, Through : The GeneraS Manager, South East .52 Central Railway, Biiaspur Zone, BILASPUR (C.G.) 2. The Divisional Railway Manager, South East Central Raiiway, Nagpur Divjsion, NAGPUR (MS) 3. The Divii. Commercial Manager, South East Centrai Raiiway, Nagpur Division, NAGPUR (MS) 4. The Chief Station Manager, S.E.C. Raiiway, DONGARGARH, District Rajnandgaon (CG) 5. The Chief Statlon Manager, S.E.C. Rallway, RAJNANDGAON, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Writ Pejjtlon Under ArticSe 22€/ 227 of the Constitutjon of India (SB : Hon'bie JVIr. Satish K. Agnshotri, J.) Present: Shri B.P. Rao, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Abhishek Sinha, Advocate for the respondents No.2,3, 4 & 5. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 14th day of IViay, 2008) With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing, flnaliy, 1. Shri Abhlshek Slnha, iearned counsei appearing for respondents No.2,3,4 & 5 submits that if there is no legal impedimentin providing application forms for consideration of licensee Cooiies/ Porters for the post of Gang man, the same witl be provided. Issue of '39 application forms will not confer any right on the appiicants to claim appointment. In view of thefairstatement made bythe learned counse! appearing for the respondents No.2, 3, 4 & 5, it is not necessary to pass any order at this stage. The petltion is accordingEy disposed of. No order asto costs. __. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge