IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28991 of 2010 BOBBY DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 6.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Certainly petitioner was made opposite party no.2 in Cr.Misc.No. 20363 of 2009 and was not heard while anticipatory bail was granted to her husband but her wild allegation of torture for demand of dowry after lapse of 12 years of marriage leveled against all the family members including married sister-in-law was taken ground for allowing bail to opposite party no.2 (husband) that how can be differred, is not satisfactorily explained by learned counsel for the petitioner. Nature of allegation was taken at desertion of wife herself. If there is chance of reconciliation, doors are opened in trial. The Court can never force any of the parties at the stage of bail for any condition of its own including living separate or joint by the wife or husband. In my view, no ground is made out for cancellation of bail. Hence the prayer for cancellation of anticipatory bail is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)