1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.450 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1077 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.880 OF 2007 IN SPL. NDPS CASE NO.159 OF 2006 [Mohammed Wasiu Idowu @ Wasim @ Wasu. Vs. Union of India & Anr.] ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, office : Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, : appearances, Court’s : orders or directions : and Registrar’s orders : ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Aniket Vagal, Adv. for the Applicant. Mrs.P.H.Kantharia, Counsel for Union of India. Mr.Y.S.Shinde, APP, for the State. CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : DATED : DATED : 29th April, 2008. P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned Counsel for the respondent-Union of India. 2. By order dated 3rd April, 2008 the applicant was granted bail by this Court in Special NDPS Case No.159 of 2006. However, the bail was granted subject to two local sureties in the sum of Rs.85,000/- being furnished. 2 The learned Counsel for the applicant has submitted that it is difficult for the applicant to furnish sureties from Mumbai. It is stated that on account of the applicant not furnishing sureties from Mumbai the applicant is languishing in jail though he has been granted bail by this Court. The learned Counsel therefore prays that permission may be granted to the applicant to furnish sureties from Malegaon, Nashik. 3. Looking to the above facts, I am inclined to modify the order dated 3rd April, 2008 in respect of furnishing local sureties . Instead of local sureties, the applicant is permitted to furnish two sureties from Malegaon, Nashik. The rest of the conditions in the order dated 3rd April, 2008 are maintained. 4. Application is disposed of accordingly. 3 [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]