IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 844 of 2008 Rao Sahid Ali Khan, S/o Late Shri Ashik Ali Khan. ... Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. ..…. Respondents Mr. Shashikant Shandilya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Shashikant Shandilya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted final report against the petitioner before the Circle Officer concerned on 20.11.2008 and the same is likely to be submitted before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 22.10.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the final report before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 15.12.2008 V.K