IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.904 of 2010 Ram Suresh Singh Versus Municipal Commissioner & Anr. ----------- 4 06/07/2011 In the show cause filed on behalf of the Opposite Party, there is a categorical statement that the encroachment made by one Uma Shankar Singh has been demolished by the Municipal authorities to the extent of the direction passed in the Vigilance case. If some more construction has been carried out during the interregnum, then the Opposite party cannot be hauled up for contempt. In fact, petitioner may have a case for demonstrating before the concerned authority that Uma Shankar Singh is a person who has no respect for law. Since the petitioner has already moved the Municipal Commissioner on further construction which is labeled as illegal, let the authorities after hearing the parties decide so and may be come down heavily on the deviant if the allegation of the petitioner is found to be correct. So far as the contempt matter is concerned, it has to rest. It is dismissed accordingly. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) - 2 -