IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 29TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 7TH ASWINA 1930 W.P(C).No. 28763 of 2008(Y) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- GEETHAMMA JOHNSON, W/O JOHNSON, AGED 35YEARS, KIZHAKKEMURI, ENTHAYAR P.O., KOOTTIKKAL (VIA), KOTTYAM, REPRESENTED BYMOTHER AND POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER LEELAMMA JOHNSON. BY ADV. SRI.R. SATISH KUMAR RESPONDENT: --------------- THE SECRETARY, KOOTTIKKAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KOOTTIKKAL P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 28763 OF 2008 - Y = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 29th day of September 2008 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner is against Ext. P13 by which the application made by him for regularization of a construction has been rejected by the 1 st respondent. In my view there is no reason why the Petitioner should have filed this writ petition for the reason that Ext. P13 is an appealable order. Therefore, it is for the petitioner to seek appellate remedies against Ext. P13. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that if implementation of Ext. P13 is not deferred for a shortwhile there is a possibility that the Panchayat might implement Ext. P13. In order to take care of this grievance expressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, I direct that status quo in so far as Ext. P13 is concerned shall be maintained for 2 weeks from today and in the meanwhile it will be open to the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedies that are available. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-