IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11232 of 2011 1. Chandan Kumar, son of Sri Krishna Prasad, resident of Village and P.S. Sahebganj P.O. Kurnol, district Muzaffarpur, at present S.I. R.P.F. Chhapra Junction, Chhapra. 2. Parmeshwar Kumar, son of Sri Sahdeo Bind, resident of village Jalalabad, P.O. and P.S. Asarganj, district Munger, at present S.I. R.P.F.Chhapra Junction, Chhapra …Petitioners Versus 1. The Union of India, through I.G-cum-Chief Security Commissioner, R.P.F. North East Railway, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh. 2. The General Manager, North East Railway, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh. 3. The D.I.G. cum Deputy Chief Security Commissioner, R.P.F. North East Railway, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh. 4. The Senior Divisional Security Commissioner, R.P.F. Varanasi Divisional, Lahartara, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh 5. The Divisional Rail Manager, North East Railway, Varanasi Division, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh. 6. The Station Superintendent, North East Railway, Chhapra Junction, Chhapra. 7. The Chief Ticket Inspector, North East Railway, Chhapra, Junction, Chhapra 8. Sri Manjor Ali Ansari, the Inspector, R.P.F. Chhapra Junction, Chhapra 9. The Inspector, Crime Investigation Bureau, Chapra Junction, Chhapra. …Respondents ----------- 02. 15.07.2011 The two petitioners herein were serving as The Sub Inspectors. They assail the order contained in annexure-9 and 9/1, whereby pursuant to orders of transfer passed by competent authority, they have been directed to be relieved. Mr. Sinha learned Sr. counsel for the Respondent- Railway, submits that orders of transfer passed in respect of the two petitioners herein have not been challenged. In his submission, the fall out thereof, therefore, cannot be challenged. I have perused the prayer made in the writ petition as also the pleading made in support thereof. The petition requires to be dismissed on its threshold at least on two counts. Firstly, the pleadings made in the writ petition, in my view, do not make out a case that the relieving order(s) is/are the product 2 of mala fide. Secondly, petitioners have not impugned their orders of transfer. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. However, dismissal of this writ petition shall not preclude the petitioners from making appropriate representation before the competent authority against their orders of transfer. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )