vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.45 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.45 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.45 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.149 OF 2004 Shri Suryakant Sahebrao Salvi ... Applicant V/s. Chandrika Govind Auchare & Anr. ... Respondents Mr.Sanjay Kshrisagar for Applicant Ms.S.D. Shinde, APP, for Respondent CORAM: A.R. JOSHI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J. DATED: APRIL 1, 2009 APRIL 1, 2009 APRIL 1, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . It is rather a strange circumstance that the present application is brought before the court. By this application, the petitioner i.e. the original complainant sought permission to change the address of respondent No.1 wife of the petitioner, in original Criminal Revision Application No.149 of 2004 and asked for suitable amendment and further sought directions to the Office to serve the notice on such changed address of Respondent No.1. The learned advocate Shri Sanjay Kshirsagar for the petitioner is heard. However, on going through the record of the matter, it is revealed that much earlier on 13.10.2005 the original Criminal Revision Application No.149 of 2004 came to be dismissed by this Court. It was then restored and again it came to be dismissed on 3.10.2007. Thereafter again : 2 : restoration application was filed and orders were passed on 25.10.2007 directing the Petitioner to deposit costs of Rs.1000 with the Kirtikar Law Library. However, such directions were not complied. Hence, there was no revival of the Criminal Revision Application No.149 of 2004 which was last dismissed on 30.7.2005. Thereafter, till this time neither there is any application for condonation of delay nor is there restoration of the said dismissed revision application. However, the present application asking for amendment for giving changed address of Respondent No.1 came to be filed being Criminal application No.45 of 2009 and it is placed before this Court without there being any note from the Registry as to the earlier dismissal of the main Revision Application. 2. In view of such factual position, in fact the present application i.e. Criminal application No.45 of 2009 does not survive and the is accordingly dismissed. 3. In order to see that such above factual position should not recurr in future, an appropriate enquiry shall be intiated by the Registrar (Judicial - I) as to how the application for any amendment, etc. was entertained in an already dismissed matter. Report to be submitted within two weeks from today. : 3 : 4. S.O. for two weeks.