1 ca4120.07 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4120 OF 2007 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 3545 OF 2007 [Record Officer, Army Ordinance COrps.,Secundarabad-15 vs. Smt. Rahibai Dashrath Kadam & Ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. N.R. Shaikh, A.G.P. for applicant. Mr. S.Y. Mahajan, Advocate for respondents. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 9TH NOVEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard learned A.G.P. for the applicant and learned Counsel for the respondent. Learned Counsel for the respondent invited my attention to the affidavit in reply and submitted that, inordinate delay of 275 days has not been properly explained. Therefore, he would submit that, the application for condonation of delay may be rejected. 2 ca4120.07 2. I have given due consideration to the rival submissions. In the light of contents of the application for condonation of delay and in particular para-2 and 3 of the said application, in the facts and circumstances of this case, delay deserves to be condoned. 3. In that view of the matter, Civil Application for condonation of delay is allowed and stands disposed of. . Second Appeal to be placed for admission on 25-11-2011. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/NOV11