IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34687 of 2008 1. UPENDRA PANDEY 2. Triloki Pandey @ Triloki Nath Pandey Both sons of Sumeshwar Pandey, R/o Vill. Hardiya, P.S. Jagdishpur, Dist. Bhojpur. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 14.11.2008 Heard. Petitioners are brothers of the informant. Petitioner no.1 has been arrested and accordingly, his application for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected. Petitioners and the complainant live in the same house having common roof. In the first information report, it has been alleged that through the roof petitioners committed theft of ornaments and articles belonging to the informant. It has been stated that though, articles have been returned, ornaments have not been. It has been stated that in relation to the matter in question Panchayati was held when the Panchayati directed the petitioners to give Rs. 38,000/- to the informant. It has been alleged that since Rs. 38,000/- was not given, the first information report was lodged. Considering the allegations, as above, the application for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. Let the petitioner no.2, Triloki Pandey @ Triloki NathPandey, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today, be 2 enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 83 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. S.B.P. (Barin Ghosh,J.)