THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2533 OF 2011 ORDER: This revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order, dated 24-06-2011 in I.A.No.724 of 2011 in O.S.No.167 of 2004 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, whereunder and whereby the application filed under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 to send the disputed signatures in Exs.B1 to B5 along with the admitted signatures of the respondent to the handwriting expert for comparison and opinion, was dismissed. 2. As seen from the impugned order, one of the documents has already been sent along with the admitted signatures to the expert. When the handwriting expert returned those documents directing the petitioner to submit extensive signatures, that petition was withdrawn. So the present application was filed again for sending the same documents Exs.B1 to B5. When the petitioner is unable to furnish the extensive signatures as required by the expert, the question of again sending the documents to the expert does not arise. The remedy, if any, should be the petitioner should have requested the Court at that point of time to send the extensive signatures. As the petitioner himself admitted that no extensive signatures are available, he withdrew that petition. Therefore, again he cannot be permitted to file another petition for the self same relief. The trial Court rightly dismissed the application and there are no grounds to interfere with the same. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ---------------------- K.C.BHANU, J. DATED: 19-07-2011 Hsd[