1 307.10 SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.307 OF 2010 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.165 OF 2010 Mrs.Shivani Mehul Mehta ...Applicant Versus Mr.Mehul Vinod Mehta ...Respondent ...... Mr.Basil Menezes for Applicant. Ms.Sanober Nanavati for Respondent. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED:- APRIL 28, 2011. P.C. 1. By this Application, the applicant-wife has prayed for direction against the respondent-husband to return the streedhan articles belonging to her. The applicant-wife filed matrimonial Petition before the Family Court for divorce and other reliefs. In terms of prayer clause (d) of the MJ Petition, the applicant prayed for this very relief, which is now prayed in the present Application. Prayer clause (d) of the M.J. Petition reads thus: “d. Be pleased to pass an order and direction be given to the Respondent to return all the Streedhan articles of the Petitioner, as per the list annexed hereto.” 2 307.10 2. If the relief now claimed in this Application were to be granted, it would result in virtually allowing the Appeal itself at this stage. No case for passing such mandatory order is made out. The relief is already subject matter of Appeal and unless the findings of the Family Court are to be set- aside, question of considering the reliefs claimed in this Application does not arise. Accordingly, the same is rejected. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)