IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.9719 of 2009 1. RAMAKANT PANDEY 2. Ashok Pandey, son of Bigan Pandey @ Rajendra Pandey Both resident of village Pandey Karma, P.S. Mali Distt. Aurangabad ........................ Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ............................... Opp. Party ----------- 2 22.05.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners and the State. The offence is alleged under Sections 323, 504, 506, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3(i) (x) of the Schedule Cast and Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Counsel for the petitioners submits that a false case has been instituted by the informant taking advantage of the members of schedule caste. However, subsequently, petition has been filed by the informant stating no such occurrence has taken place. Counsel for the petitioners submits that witnesses named in the FIR filed before the Chief Judicial Magistrate stated that no occurrence, as alleged in the FIR, has taken place. Considering the fact, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioners, namely, Ramakant Pandey and Ashok Pandey is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, the petitioners above named, will be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with S.C./S.T. Gaya P.S. Case No. 10 of 2007, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Kundan (Mridula Mishra, J.)