1 5 S.B. CIVIL WRIT CONTEMPT PETITION NO.56/2009. Bhawani Ram Vs. State & Anr. Date of Order :: 15th April 2009. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI None present for the petitioner. Mr. P.R. Singh, for the non-petitioners. .... BY THE COURT: Nobody is present for the petitioner. Pursuant to the order dated 18.12.2008 as passed in CWP No. 9616/2008, it was required of the respondents to decide the representation filed by the petitioner within a week of receipt of the certified copy of the order. It appears that the decision on the representation has been taken, albeit with a delay of few days, on 19.01.2009. The respondents have stated the reasons for delay particularly for their engagement in dealing with the other matters and carrying out compliance of other orders passed by this Court at Jaipur Bench; and have tendered unconditional apology for delay. Having regard to the reasons stated and the overall circumstances, this Court is satisfied that the delay was unintentional. Decision having been taken on the representation, the 2 requirements of the order dated 18.12.2008 have been carried out and there appears no reason to continue with these contempt proceedings any further. These contempt proceedings are dropped and notices are discharged. However, it shall not prejudice the rights of the petitioner to take resort to appropriate remedies in accordance with law, if aggrieved of the decision on the representation. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. /Mohan/