1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6098/2007 Babulal v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 21st November, 2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. I.R.Choudhary, for the petitioner. Mr. S.Toshniwal, for the respondents. .... The candidature of the petitioner for the purpose of appointment to the post of Teacher Gr.III as a consequent to process of selection initiated under advertisement Anx.2 dated 30.10.2006 was rejected on the count that the petitioner was not possessing a qualification equivalent to basic school training certificate (BSTC). Being aggrieved by the same, this petition for writ is preferred stating therein that in view of the Government of Rajasthan's notification dated 19.10.2004 referred in document Anx.8 dated 15.11.2004 issued by the Director-cum- Special Secretary to the Government of Rajasthan, Department of Rural Development and Local Self Government, the qualification possessed by the petitioner i.e. of “Purva Prathmik Prashikshan” is equivalent to the qualification of BSTC. By way of filing an additional affidavit it is also pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents allowed appointment to Bhanwarlal s/o Khumaram; Kalawati d/o 2 Singhram; Veena Chejara d/o Vishwanath Chejara and Savitri d/o Noparam, though they too are having the qualification that is possessed by the petitioner. Shri Shyam Toshniwal, counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents clarified the position by stating that as a matter of fact a decision was taken by the Government of Rajasthan on 17.4.2008 and that was notified on 25.4.2008 and according to that a decision was taken as per the instructions given by National Council for Teachers Education to appoint the persons having qualification of NTT at the honorarium of Rs.2750/- and those persons are required to undergo a bridge course at their own expenses within a period of three months and as such the petitioner could have undergone the bridge course on being employed on probation at a consolidated honorarium of Rs.2750/-. Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is having no objection if he be permitted now to undergo bridge course on being appointed on probation at consolidated honorarium of Rs.2750/-. In view of whatever stated above, this petition for writ is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider candidature of the petitioner for the purpose of appointment as Teacher Gr.III on probation at a consolidated honorarium of Rs.2750/- as per circular dated 25.4.2008 (Anx.10), if 3 he stands in merit and is otherwise eligible to be employed as Teacher Gr.III. It is also made clear that candidature of the petitioner is required to be considered if the respondents are having a vacant post of Teacher Gr.III notified under the notification dated 30.10.2006. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. kkm/ps.