In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh R. F. A No. 3184 of 2001 (O&M) Jagir Singh ... Appellant vs State of Haryana and others .... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Ms. Avinash Mandla, Advocate for Mr. M. L. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Ashish Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. The landowner has approached this court for enhancement of compensation for the acquisition of land. Briefly, the facts are that vide notification dated 26.6.1989, issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act'), the State of Haryana acquired land in the revenue estate of Village Bana Madanpur, Tehsil and District Panchkula (the then District Ambala), for the development and utilisation of land as residential, commercial and Industrial area in Urban Estate Panchkula. The Land Acquisition Collector assessed the market value of the different kinds of land at different rates. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the landowners/claimants filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below, determined the market value of the acquired land at Rs. 3,50,000/- per acre. Learned counsel for the parties submitted that the issue involved in the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this court in R. F. A. No. 1281 of 1999– Gurdev Singh and others vs State of Haryana decided on 27.10.2006, whereby the appeals arise out of the same acquisition have been remitted back for fresh consideration. For the reasons recorded in Gurdev Singh's case (supra), the appeal is disposed of in the same terms. The parties through their counsel are directed to appear before the learned District Judge, Panchkula, on 20.3.2010. The learned District Judge may either keep the references with himself or may entrust the same to any other Additional District Judge who is dealing with the cases referred back by this Court. 1.2.2010 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge