HON’BLE SHRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT APPEAL No. 31 of 2008 Dated: 28-01-2008 Between: Alapati Arundhathi …Appellant AND Commissioner of Intermediate Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and others …Respondents JUDGEMENT: (Per Anil R. Dave, CJ) The appellant-petitioner had challenged the validity of the order, whereby she was placed under suspension by filing writ petition No. 21895 of 2006. After hearing the learned Advocates, the learned single Judge has dismissed the writ petition. We have heard the learned Advocates. The appellant has been aggrieved by the order of suspension. The suspension is not a punishment. It has been submitted by the learned Government Pleader for Higher Education that the enquiry would be completed as soon as possible so that further action can be taken. If the appellant is found innocent, the order of suspension will be revoked. It has been submitted by the learned Government Pleader for Higher Education that the enquiry would be completed preferably within four weeks, if the appellant extends her cooperation. We are sure that the appellant shall extend her cooperation and the department shall complete the enquiry as soon as possible and preferably within four weeks. We do not find any substance in the appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed subject to the above observation, with no order as to costs. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J 28th January, 2008 GRR