IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2011 / 13TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 30738 of 2009(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- NAWAZ K.T., S/O.MOYUDU HAJI, KUNNATHARMAN, P.O.THIRUVALLUR, VADAKARA. BY ADV. SRI.NIRMAL. S RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE CHAIRPERSON, BHARAT INSTITUTE OF HIGHER EDUCATION & RESEARCH (DEEMED UNIVERSITY), SELAIYOR, CHENNAI-600 0073. 2. THE SECRETARY, ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATIONAL (AICTE), 7TH FLOOR, CHANDERLOKH BUILDING, JANPATH, NEW DELHI-100 001. R2 BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI , SC, AICTE SRI.S.KRISHNAMURTHY,SC, AICTE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 30738 of 2009(J) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF CHALLAN EVIDENCE PAYMENT EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 23.10.2008 EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF LAWYER NOTICE DATED 13.05.2009 EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATE D 8.7.09 EXT.P5 ; TRUE COPY OF THE N EWSPAPER REPORT IN MATHRUBHUMI DAILY DATED 19.06.2009. /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 30738 OF 2009 ......................................................................... Dated this the 3rd June , 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has approached this court with the following prayers: “1. Issue a writ of mandamus or such other writ, order or direction, this Honourable Court deems fit to grant directing the 2nd respondent to issue directions to the 1st respondent to refund an amount of Rs.52,000/- being the tuition fee collected by the 1st respondent from the petitioner. 2. Issue such other writ, order or direction, this Honourable Court deems fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if a direction is given to the second respondent to consider Ext. P4 representation within a reasonable time. W.P.(C) No. 30738 OF 2009 2 3. In view of the limited nature of the reliefs sought for, this court does not find it necessary to go into the merits of the case. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider Ext. P4 representation and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk