IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Rev. No.3146 of 2011. Date of decision: December 15, 2011. Amarjit Kaur .. Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and another .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI * * * PRESENT Mr.Sandeep Arora, Adv., for the petitioner. M.M.S.BEDI, J (ORAL). On the basis of the improbability of injury with a spade having been suffered by Manpreet Singh at the hands of petitioner lady, quashing of charge is prayed for. Since there are specific allegations against the petitioner of having inflicted an injury with spade on the head of complainant, on the appreciation of evidence the improbability of injured having received injury with a spade at the hands of petitioner cannot be determined, at this stage. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated being related to Harbans Singh, the main accused. No ground is made out to exercise the revisional jurisdiction to interfere in the order of framing charges. Dismissed. However, it is observed that in case the petitioner being a lady moves an application for exemption from personal appearance, the same may be allowed by the trial Court in case the petitioner does not dispute her identity and makes a statement before the Court that the evidence may be recorded in her absence but in the presence of her counsel as per the provisions of Section 273 Cr.P.C. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE December 15, 2011. rka