ssp 1 WP 455 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.455 OF 2007 Siddhivinayak Tower Co-op. Hsg. Soc. .....Petitioner versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.N.J.Devarshee, for the petitioner. Ms.V.S.Gharpure, for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.R.J.Mane, AGP, for respondent No.3. Mr.N.H.Shukla, for respondent No.6. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE: 20 th DECEMBER, 2011 P.C. 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has settled the dispute with the respondent No.6. He states that the dispute is settled out of Court and the consent terms agreed by the said parties are produced on record. He states that the Chairman of the petitioner Society is present in the Court, to whom he identified. Mr.Kadam, Partner of respondent No.6 is also present in the Court, to whom the learned counsel for the respondent No.6 is identified. He states that since the dispute is settled out of Court, he may be permitted to withdraw the petition. The consent terms are accordingly taken on record and marked Exh.X for identification. ssp 2 WP 455 of 2007 2. Since the petitioner and the respondent No.6 have settled the dispute out of Court, permission to withdraw the petition is granted and the petition is disposed of as such. It is clarified that the Corporation in any way is not bound by the consent terms as the Corporation is not signatory to the consent terms and the Corporation is directed to act in accordance with law. It is also pointed out by both the sides that the Court Receiver is already discharged. The said statement is recorded. ( MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)