{1} FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6118 OF 2009 {New India Assurance Co., Ltd., Vs. Dyanoba Manikrao Salunke} WITH CA NO.6119/09 AND FAST NO. 12342/2009 Office notes, office memorandum of coram, appearances, court’s order or directions and Registrar’s order. Court’s or Judge’s orders ShriDhananjay Deshpande, Advocate for applicant. *** Coram : K.U.Chandiwal, J. Date: 29th June 2009. 01- Heard learned counsel for the insurance company. There is delay of 59 days in causing to file the appeal. The insurance company is seeking to challenge the judgment and award in WCA No.29/2003 dt.16/02/2009 passed by learned Commissioner for Workmen Compensation & Labour Judge, Latur. The delay is not deliberate. On technical grounds, one should not foreclose the grievance felt by the insurance company. The application is allowed. 02- The amount under challenge is deposited by the insurance Company. The order under challenge is stayed till the next date. {2} 03- Notice in the Appeal and also stay petition to the respondents returnable on 22th July 2009. 04- S.O., to 22th July 2009. [K.U.CHANDIWAL] JUDGE /mda/0609/ca6118.09