é?) ‘ HIQH CGURT OF CHH§‘?T€SGARH: BILASPUR W?it Patitiora (_$} No. 10 6 a? 2$93 Eetitioner Smt. Bhagbeti Sahu, Wio. Banthuram Sahu, Aged abgut 59 years, r/o. Village Aannd}: Tehsi§- Dcngargarh, P 3 Dongargarh, Dist Rajnandgaon (CG) Versus 1) State of Chha‘ttisgarh through the Secremry, Pubiio Works Department, D‘KS. Bhawan, Raipur(CG), '2) Fihance Secretary-l State of Chhatt§sgaml D_K.S‘ Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 3) Sub-DMsionai Officer, Sub —Div§sim Oifsce CG. PWDV PWD Office: Dongargarh, Disii Ra'jnandgaom (CG). Ressondents (Writ Pe€ition under Articie 226 of the C0nst§tution 0f mdia) S3: Hon’me Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, 3‘ Pregeni; ‘ , Sm H‘SV Ahuiwagia, counse; far the paétéoner. Shri AS. Kachhawaha, Deputy Advocate Generai for the State. {BRA}. ORDER {?a$§ed 9n 18‘” Februes'y, 299$) The order dated 13-2—2008 issued by the Deputy Secretary, Pubiic Works Department: Government of Chhattisgarh; Raipur; is circuiated by Mr. AS. Kachahawa, Deputy Advocate General and the same is taken on record. 2) Learned counsel appering for the respondentslState submits that the impugned order dated 2242-200? (Annexure Pm) whereby the petitioner was directed to retire on attaining the age or’ 6O years, has been canceited Learned counsel further suomits that the State Gnvernment by order dated 13—2-2008 (supra), has decided to retire the permanent gangman on attaining the age of 6‘2 years. tn view of this, nothing survives in this matter. 3} Accordingiy, this petition is disposed or”. Satish K. Agnihntyi , 77 Judge Sd/- Raid