/ sm‘e 339““ 3 P IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CPMATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ' WRIT PETITION N0. 135 o4 03/ PETITIONER? /Prem Narayan Shukla Aged 54 years S/o— Late Prabhu lal Shukla M \ “W é::§:::ni TTTT33PI°SW Police Head Quarter 3” C. I. D. Branch Raipur v I I L I ‘ n 2, Principle Secretary General Administrative Department, D. K. S. Bhawan Raipur (C. G. ) /3) Director Public Prosecution Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Hel) T7 c A9 / T T “Kw Tah. 8L Distt‘ Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTSP 1) State of Chhattisgarh / f Throughz- Principle Secretary Home Department Mantralaya, D. K. S. Bhawan Raipur (CI G.) XI—HC—78 LO o... q; 2995 K wmm Qg 'Jog Wwaimrragg $WW 92.03.2005. for the petitioner. Shl‘i Virendra Sharma, couilse] $hri Bhaskftr Pyashi, Panel ]Lawyer for the State on advance copy. Applicatigu (I.A.Nb.3a4 on Haard on admission. The main grievance of the p titioner is that lhe records of the original application No.188/98H filed before \ the M.P. State ipur has not been transferred to this Court till date. The prayer is th tthe same be called or transferred as early as possible and the matter e disposed of in accordance with law. Counsel for the petitioner su 5) for urgent homing is allowed. e ts that since the SAT. has been abolished, there is no impediment in transferring the matter to this Court, as the matters are to be transf rred in a routine'ma‘nner. State does not oppose this lim 'ted prayer. The prayer is allowed. _ Let records of O.A. No. 1 88/9 be transferred to the High’Court. i ' The petition stands finally d Certified copy as per rules. P'I‘J ii Administrative Tribunal bench at mm,m,m es (35’ WW(W) b a i