IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8226 of 2007 MD.MONIR, S/o Late Naeem (Retd. Peon, Patna Municipal Corporation), Resident of Mohalla- Balkishunganj Ghera, P.S. - Alamganj, District – Patna. ...... Petitioner Versus 1. PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION through its Commissioner- cum-Chief Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. 2. Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Budh Marg, Kotwali, District – Patna. 3. Chief Accounts Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. ........ Respondents ----------- 2 22.06.2011 Heard Sri Prem Nath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Arun Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the respondents/Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already been paid all other retiral dues, save and except some amount of G.P.F. As per the petitioner, Rs. 8,000/- and odd is lying under the head of provident fund account. In view of the facts, the court is of the opinion, that the writ petition can be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no. 2/Commissioner-cum- Chief Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna, within a period of six weeks. If such representation is filed, respondent no. 2, is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no. 2 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he may pass order for clearing the said amount within the aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, respondent no. 2, is required to pass a speaking order within aforesaid time. With above observation and direction the writ petition stands disposed of. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)