IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-36621 of 2009 Date of Decision: January 12, 2010 Yash Pal & Others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS U.T. Chandigarh & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. T.P.S. Tung, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Ashima Mohindru, Advocate, for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Dr. Surya Prakash, Advocate, for respondent No.3. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuing directions to the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Chandigarh to take decision on applications, Annexure P-2 dated 29.1.2009 and Annexure P-3 dated 18.5.2009. It transpires that in FIR No.80 dated 25.4.2008 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station, Sector 3, Chandigarh, investigation has been concluded and cancellation Crl. Misc. No. M-36621 of 2009 [2] report has been filed which has been placed on record as Annexure P-1. The Magistrate, under the circumstances, was required to give notice to the complainant. Notice however was sent to the Investigating Officer. Be that as it may, the complainant has filed applications, seemingly in objection to the cancellation report. No decision thereupon has been taken. Learned counsel for the private respondent states that he would have no objection if the Magistrate is directed to take decision on the applications, Annexure P-2 and P-3. Considering the issue, I am of the opinion that cancellation report dated 4.9.2008 having been filed, notice was required to be issued to the complainant. Be that as it may, the complainant has filed applications which are required to be dealt with in accordance with law. The petition is disposed of with direction to the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Chandigarh, dealing with the issue, to take note of applications Annexure P-2 and P-3 and pass orders as required by law, within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (AJAI LAMBA) January 12, 2010 JUDGE avin