IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-18191 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: August 02, 2011 Chattar Singh & others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Sunil Panwar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Saini, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Ms. Monika Jalota, Advocate, for Mr. Anil Ghanghas, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 to 4. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for quashing FIR No.223 dated 14.7.2010 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 323, 325, 34 IPC, registered with Police Station, Tauru, District Mewat, and cross version/ complaint dated 14.7.2010 (Annexure P-2) under Sections 323, 325, 506, 34 IPC alongwith consequent proceedings, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-3). Crl. Misc. No. M-18191 of 2011 [2] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that an incident took place between the petitioners and respondent Nos.2 to 4. In the interest of peace and harmony and on the intervention of respectables, all the disputes have been settled. 3. Short written statement and affidavits of the private respondents have been filed in Court which are taken on record. 4. The petitioners as also respondent Nos.2 to 4 are present in Court, as identified by their respective counsel. Parties have endorsed the fact that they want to live in peace and harmony, and therefore, proceedings in FIR and cross case be quashed. 5. Considering the fact that parties are not ready to prosecute each other, continuance of proceedings shall not be of any purpose in law. Rather continuance of proceedings shall not be conducive to peaceful living of the parties who are residents of the same area. 6. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.223 dated 14.7.2010 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 323, 325, 34 IPC, registered with Police Station, Tauru, District Mewat, and cross version/ complaint dated 14.7.2010 (Annexure P-2) under Sections 323, 325, 506, 34 IPC alongwith consequent proceedings, are hereby quashed. (AJAI LAMBA) August 02, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? Crl. Misc. No. M-18191 of 2011 [3] 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?