IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.12611 of 2006 Between: A.Srinivasulu Reddy S/o.Guravaiah Reddy Pudi village, Thottambadu Mandal, Chittoor District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State Election Commission, rep. by its Secretary, Budda Bhavan, Hyderabad 2 The District Election Authority and District Collector, Chittoor district 3 The Returning Officer, Thotambadu Mandal, Thotambadu,Chittoor District 4 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupati, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the order of the 3rd respondent dated 18.6.2006 in rejecting the nomination of the petitioner and the appeal order of the 4th respondent in ROC.Ele/A.P.V1/06 dated 20.6.2006 as illegal, and contrary to the provisions of the Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.SRINIVAS DAMMALAPATI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. MR. V.V.PRABHAKARA RAO The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.12611 of 2006 ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ JUSTICE G.ROHINI 21st July, 2008. IBL