IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1106 (SS) of 2011 Jaspal Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents Mr. Hem Chand Joshi, Advocate present for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Bisht, learned Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) 1. Heard Mr. Hem Chand Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner, and Mr. Anil Bisht, learned Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. The petitioner is a Class-IV daily rated employee. He is working in the respondents department since 1.1.1990 and prayed for regularization in service on the above post. The daily rated employees in the Forest Department have been agitating for long years for their regularization. 3. Such type of matters were finally settled by the Hon’ble Apex Court Apex Court in the case of State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal reported in [(2006) 9 SCC 337] where directions were given to the authorities to regularize such daily rated employees. Consequent to the said judgment, State of Uttarakhand has already framed its rules regarding regularization of such daily rated employees known as the Uttaranchal Forest Department Regularization (On Group “D” Posts) of Daily Wages Appointment Rules, 2003. 4. As such, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that if the petitioner moves a representation before Divisional Forest Officer, Tehri Dam Forest Division-I Tehri, Tehri Garhwal (respondent no. 5), he shall dispose of the representation of the petitioner by a 2 speaking order in accordance with law within six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. 6. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) Dated: 22.11.2011 VKG