IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.396 of 2008 MD.HAMID Versus THE STATE OF IBHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 14.5.2008 During the course of motion hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner did not dispute, rather he admitted that pursuant to a Public Interest Litigation filed before this Court, Subina Khatoon (petitioner claims her to be his wife) was released from remand home in favour of respondent no.4, Babloo Ram. If that be the order of this Court, we are afraid that the present criminal writ petition is misconceived in its place. The remedy available to the petitioner is to apply for review/recall of the order of this Court. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. HR/BT ( Rajendra Mal Lodha, CJ ) ( C. K. Prasad, J )