1 WP NO.9784/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 WRIT PETITION NO. 9784 OF 2010 ,With CA/6492/2011 ,In WP/9784/2010 MUNICIPAL COUNCIL PARALI (V) THROUGH CHIEF OFFICER VERSUS SHANKAR DATTATRAYA GOSWAMI (DIED) TH LRS SHIVAJI SHANKAR GOSWAMI AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioners : Mr.Naiknavare Ramesh V. Advocate for Respondents Nos.R 1C, 1D and 1E: Mr. Shrikant Kulkarni. Advocate for Respondent No.3-A: Mr. S.W.Munde. ... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. Dated: November 25, 2011 ... PER COURT :- 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. Belated filing of appeal and its registration entailed in destruction of the Court record, particularly, the evidence. The grievance is, the learned District Judge should have been gracious enough to remand the matter to reconstruct the evidence. 3. The evidence to which repeated reference is given by Mr.Naiknavare, learned Counsel, is available with the learned Counsel for the 2 WP NO.9784/2010 respondent/original plaintiff by way of documents. These documents, indeed, according to the learned Counsel Mr.Kulkarni, for the respondent 1-C, 1-D and 1-E, are available on the record; still, he is ready to furnish extra copies thereof within a week to the learned Counsel for the writ petitioner to proceed with the ongoing appeal before the learned District Judge. 4. In the above set of situation, challenge to the order of the learned District Judge is erroneous. The order does not call for any interference. Writ Petition lacks merit, dismissed, with Civil Application. ( K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. ) ... agp/9784-10wp