^tti^^.- / ^yi IN_THE HIGH COURT OFJ'UDICATURE CIiHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SSXHXEMSi.^.P.NO. ^>??0 Z .OF 2003 / PSTITIONER ;- RAH CHARAN NISHAD.,AGED ABOL1T 68 YEARS. S/0'PA\\^\'R^ \<.A^\ ^TS"^A3) /RETIRED GRAM SAHAYAKiR/0 VII-IAGE ARAOD (LILAR )TAHSIL AND DI3TRICT DHAMTARI(C.0.) VER S U S RE5PONDJ3NTS;- -1. STATE GOVERNMENT OF CHI-iATTISGARH THROUGH TME SECRET7^RY MENISTRY OF PANCI'I&YAT A^ SAI-3AJ SEWA DAU KALYAN Sl'NG BHANAN R^IPUR(C.G.) .-•^- ^.^ /\^y ^tS?- ..^^"" y" .PETITIOW UNU2R ARTICI^ES 226/227 0]?/THE CONSTITUTION OF / J-Oim' DIRECTOR, DIRECTGRATE PANCHAYAT AND SAM&J SEWA, RAIPUR(C.G.) DEPUI'Y DIRECTOR, DIRECTCRATE PANCHAYAT AND SAi"I?iJ SEWA. RAIPUR(C.G,) II^IDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF I'aAI'iDA^IUS.SUITABLE l^RIT, DIRECTION-^-QRD£R IN THE ^•TURE-OF WRIT-FOR-THE PAYMENT-0£- ENT2RE SSRVICE-DUES-TO-THE-PETITION£R ^ "w' y.StS. ?;s3iasi*»^Ai.n.Mii—i>. F XI-HC-22 ^^ '<^il^lH<4, '@T^4i^ 'f^TRTy 3?T^?T "q^^ _.^.:I?...^.<?..:.iQ?J.^ ^STW^Ii^Nioh 2OT '^^ST' -^?1^['^T :^!W3?i^T 'v.^?N>^?ftn ? ^o ^^^~' ^ .V ^I^I^CT^R'^^ 06/02/2004 Shri Saatosh Saliu, counsel| Shri Pravecn Das, Paiiel La^lyer The petitioner has preferred| 226/ 227 of tlie Constitution of In^ia. The grievaace of the petitio4er petitioner froin fhe post of GT^LOI Petitioner has not been paid hjis' amount, salaiy dues aad pension] ofthe petition. Counsel for fhe petitioner allowed to inake a detailed repres( respoiidcnt uo,2 be directed to petitk>ner affcer considermg all his for t^ie State has no objection. Haviag heard the leamed regard to fhe facts aiid circuiastail aUowcd to niake a detailed wifhia a period of ten da;/s to ti^c respondent no,2 wiU decide tlie p 30 days wifh a reasoned order co3 the petitioner regarding his payine^it With fhe aforesaid observaltior petitiou staiids disposed of. Cons^qu< also stands disposed oL Paities are entitied for represc^itati< ohS^Id^1rl ^w^S^ fe^ lf^R$R ^^ri^R^ii^? |for the petitioner. for fhe rcspondcuts/ State, fhis writ petition luider Article is that after retirenient of the Sahayak on 31/07/1992. .' rctiral benefite like gratuily [amount as nientioned in para 8 subaiits fh.at petitiouer inay be |lntation to respondent np,2 and 4ecide fhe representation of the lclaiins to wliich leanied counsel cofcinsel for fhe parties aad haviag ^ces of fhe case, the petitioner is ^itation ralsuig aU. his gricvanccs |e respondent no.2 aiid in tuni ^presentation wifhin a period of ^sideriiig aU the points raised by of dues of retiral benefits. [tions aad directions, this \vrit bquentiy, M.W.P.No. 3176/2003 certifi^d copy of tiiis order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge