1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3392 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 4135 OF 2008 New India Assurance Co. Ltd. ...Applicant VERSUS Bebabi w/o Majidkhan Pathan and anr. ...Respondents ----- Shri D.S.Kulkarni, advocate holding for Shri S.L.Kulkarni, advocate for the applicant Respondent no.1 served absent Shri R.R.Patil, advocate for respondent no.2 absent. ----- CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATED : 14th September, 2010 PER COURT : - 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicant (original respondent no.2). 2 At the request of learned counsel for the applicant, leave granted to correct the number of days delay in the present application. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2 3 This is an application preferred by the applicant (original respondent no.2) for condonation of delay of 45 days in filing the accompanying First Appeal. 4 For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily. Moreover, it also appears that the said delay is not willful, deliberate or intentional and certainly it is not inordinate, and hence, same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 5 In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 45 days caused in filing the accompanying First Appeal stands condoned and said appeal be registered and numbered and present application is disposed of accordingly. [SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.] dbm/ca3392.08 3