IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2050 of 2008 SUMARIYA DEVI Versus JAGAN RAI & ORS ----------- 2 8/12/2008 This Court is rather not satisfied with the manner in which the impugned order has been passed allowing amendment in the written statement. There is absolutely no reason in the impugned order as to why such amendment has been allowed, save and except, that it was necessary to do so in the interest of justice. Such casual approach of the court below cannot be sustained under law specially when the orders passed are revisable and its correctness cannot be gone into in an effective manner in absence of reasons. That being so, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the court below to pass a fresh order, after hearing the parties, by giving reasons for the same. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar