^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Coram: Appellant/ Defendant Hon'bleShri Dhirendra Mishra, & Hon' ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar, JJ FirstAppeal (Ml No. 116 of 2008 Smt. Seema Paikra, aged about 30 years, w/o. Shri Bhola Prasad Paikra, r/o. M.I.G. 42, Pt. Shyama Prasad Mukerjee, in front of Sanskritik Bhawan, Tatibandh, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (Chhattisgarh). Vs. Respondent/ Plaintiff Bhola Prasad Paikra, aged about 35 years, s/o. Late Jagmohan Ram Paikra, r/o. village Saktipara, Post Patrapali, Police Station: Baikunthpur, Tahsil : Baikunthpur, District Korea (Chhatiisgarh). (Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984) Present: Shri G.K. Beriwal, counsel for the appellant. Shri Pawan Shrivastava, counsel for the respondent. Oral Order (Passed on this 29th day of-April, 2010) Per Dhirendra Mishra, J. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the appellant is not aggrieved by the impugned decree of divorce, but his only grievance is that while passing the decree of divorce in favour of the respondenVhusband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, "the Act, 1955") no order of permanent alimony under Section 25 of the Act, 1955 has been passed in favour of the appellant. He further submits that this appeal may be disposed of with liberty to the ^'^&r'm^ ^ \:^ 11% I sf ./ ^' appellant to approachthe Family Court for grant of permanent alimony and maintenance under Section 25 ofthe Act. 1955. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the respondent has no objection. 3) Accordingly, this appeal is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge Raju ^ llll