Civil Revision No.2788 of 2011(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.2788 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: May 2, 2011 Varinder Kumar Sharma .....Petitioner v. Sudesh Kumari .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Yogesh Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) C.M.No.11211-CII of 2011 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Civil Revision No.2788 of 2011 The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside impugned order dated 27.10.2010, Annexure P1, passed by learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana, vide which in an application filed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act (for short `the Act') in proceedings under Section 13 of the Act, initiated by present petitioner against respondent-wife, learned Court directed the petitioner to pay maintenance pendente lite to the tune of `2,000/- per month from the date of application besides litigation expenses to the tune of `2,000/-. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully including the impugned order passed by learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana. Only point argued by learned counsel for the petitioner is that respondent has already been granted ad interim maintenance @ `3,000/- per month in proceedings initiated under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short `Cr.P.C.') by her against the petitioner and hence she Civil Revision No.2788 of 2011(O&M) -2- cannot claim maintenance for the same period in both the proceedings. In view of these facts, it is clarified that if any amount has been received by respondent-wife as interim maintenance for the period claimed in this petition during proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C., the same shall be adjusted. Disposed of accordingly. 2.5.2011 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge