IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15654 of 2007 BABU LAL PRASAD @ BABU LAL SAO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 1.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Order dated 19.8.2007 contained in annexure-3 passed by Full Bench of Gram Katchahary of Gram Panchayat Kurmichak, Ghoswari, District- Patna is the subject matter of challenge in the present writ application. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in terms of section 110 of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, Gram Katchahary does not have any power to exercise when the value of the suit is beyond Rs. 10,000/-. In the present case even from the order itself the suit in question is valued at Rs. 60,000/- with regard to sale and purchase of the house and land. There is obvious error in exercise of jurisdiction and same cannot be sustained. Petitioner has made out a case for interference. The impugned order dated 19.8.2007 contained in annexure-3 stands quashed. The parties may approach the competent authority or the court of competent jurisdiction for the dispute which has been raised, if the law so permits. This writ application is allowed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)