IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 20TH JANUARY 2011 / 30TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 13485 of 2008(E) ----------------------- PETITIONER : -------------------- JANET PAULSTINE A.J., AGED 38 YEARS, W/O. S.DAS, THOTTUNGAL HOUSE, NARACKAL P.O., ELANKUNNAPUZHA, ERNAKULAM. PRESENTLY WORKING AS PD TEACHER GOVERNMENT TRIBAL UP SCHOOL, PATHIPALLY P.O., MOOLAMATTOM. BY ADVS. SRI.C.V.MANU VILSAN SRI. P.G.SURESH SRI. P.K.KHALEEMUDHEEN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, KANJAR BRANCH, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 2. THE HEAD MASTER, GOVERNMENT TRIBAL U.P.SCHOOL, PATHIPALLY P.O., MOOLAMATTOM, IDUKKI. R1 BY ADV. SRI. P.C. SASIDHARAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 13485 of 2008(E) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED IN FORM NO.9 UNDER SUB RULE (2) OF RULE 52 OF THE KERALA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969. EXT.P2 : PHOTOCOPIES OF THE RECEIPTS DATED 3.11.2007, 1.12.2007, 8.1.2008, 11.2.2008 EVIDENCING THE PAYMENT OF RS. 2000/- PER MONTH BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22.02.2008, ISSUED BUY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN FORM NO. 9 UNDER SUB RULE (2) OF RULE 52 OF THE KERALA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969. EXT.P4 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE SALARY DETAILS OF THE PETITIONER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P5 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 29.3.2008 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT, EVIDENCING THE PAYMENT OF RS. 10,000/- BY THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 13485 OF 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, learned counsel for the first respondent bank submits that the petitioner closed the loan account with the Kanjar branch of the bank on 30.6.2010 and in such circumstances, no further orders are called for in this writ petition. In the light of the said submission, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. P.N.RAVINDRAN, (JUDGE) vps WPC No. 2 WPC No. 3