IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22094 of 2010 BARKAN CHOUDHARY @ RAJESH KUMAR PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 302/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been made accused only by his alias name without any parentage. In view of the allegations, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is rejected. However, the learned court below will consider the regular bail application considering the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted that similarly situated persons have been granted regular 2 bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 44253 of 2009. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)