}Immi mimu§mwll IR T E §lG GOURT OF MA§§YA ?%£$E$§ AT JkB$£PU§ :Miacelianeetag Egtitien N0. 9m 31‘ 1993 C Déermaya vanwasi Seva SayitirEungelh, kiwi]. muageli Ei$trict Bilaspur, a society registered under 1h. Soclety P eti 3;;an er: fyay/ w q) ) rsagis trikaram Agékaimyam , 1 973 uLc ' t \‘N o.§ 44 ‘i) , ? LeJ an §§\g\3€> E Ly 5L” gkhu AJvqcih @a a %§*%‘ ‘ Resgamwn ts s/V cf 1973), beariag regiatratién 510.7460 aatea‘w—zng’zg, wrong/la, it's mesment, hr; Phaolcmna Jgin, es‘iéeét 6f Waungeli, w Tahsll Mungeli, Distrlct Bilaspur ME. V8? M $ tate‘ bL Emuzaya mac! ash , tkraugh, becretary, wrest gegw meat, vallaw Bhawaa , Bhcyal. ulvlsxmal @orest 0f¢1cwr, Blla$§ur. ‘ 5. Unian Gf Incha, thrown, than ne‘u'etary, \ Imwrtmeat af Enwremaent am? Em‘ests, Barymraran mmwan , 6.6.0 . Ccmglex, Lséi Rama, biew BelairE'. . “"mTiEICN UNTwR AnTi"LV 226/227 GONaTITUILQ‘-N (k .s.§!Di& “ \ w b \Lv S HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BfLASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 950 of 1993 Deendayal ‘V'anWasi Seva Samiti, Mungeli. VERSUS PE’I‘ITIONER RES?ONDENTS State of Madhya Pradesh & Others. UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 CONSTITUTION OF 1NDL§ ‘ PETITION i V .;« Amit SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. A niho " J. Present: None for the petitioner. State/respondent '_ No. Shli A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the 1 and 2. ORPER (ORAL) (Passed on 21*? day of October, 2010) called for hearing. None appears nor is any 1. The matte-1" is representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In View of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. . tosend a copy of this order to the 3. Registry is directed petitioner, forthwith. 7‘ ‘ sm— Satish K Agnjhotri Judge r