IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39872 of 2009 BILAS RAI son of Late Rooplal Rai, resident of village- Sangarha, P.S. Chiraiya, District- East Champaran…. Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.11.2009. Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The petitioner for omnibus allegation for offence under Section 302 and other allied sections of Indian Penal Code as also section 27 of the Arms Act by restricting his participation to be a member of mob which had done the deceased to death in all fairness could have been entitled for grant of bail but for his criminal antecedent. Counsel for the petitioner is not sure about the criminal antecedent of the petitioner but then he would submit that at least two more cases are pending against him. Considering the aforementioned aspect, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. Accordingly, the prayer for bail 2 of the petitioner is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after six months from today by revealing his correct record of criminal antecedent. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)