1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R Yaseen Khan @ Mohammed Yasin Vs. P.L.Agarwal, Collector, Chittorgarh. S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 96/2008 In S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 243/2008 ......... Date of Order : 26/05/2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. Sunil Mehta for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. By order dated 19.2.2008 the petitioner was allowed to work as office bearer of the committee which was in existence prior to the constitution of fresh committee vide Annex.6. By order Annex.A/3 at serial No.5 there is signature of the petitioner having performed the duties in the office and therefore, by order dated 24.3.2008 this Court noticed that in compliance of the order of this Court, the petitioner has been allowed to perform the duties. Apparently, it is clear that compliance of the order has been made. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thereafter the petitioner has not been permitted to perform the duty and therefore, he may be provided the security during pendency of the writ petition and no such security has been provided and respondent District Collector has disobeyed the order of this Court. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, in my view, there is no deliberate or willful disobedience of the order of this Court. The contempt petition is therefore, dismissed. However, learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that a Division Bench of this Court in Mohhamed Harun and Anr. Vs. Nissar Ahmed and Ors., D.B.Civil Special Appeal (Writs) No. 64/2008 vide judgment dated 21.5.2008 passed certain directions. In this view of the matter, the petitioner may represent to the District Collector, Chittorgarh along with certified copy of Division Bench judgment dated 21.5.2008 and if such a representation is made, the District Collector, Chittorgarh shall act upon in accordance with law. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp