1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4/2010 (Kiran Mangal Waghare vs. Kishor Mangal Waghmare and another) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Mohan Sudame, Advocate, for Petitioner Shri R.V.Gaikwad, Advocate, for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 . CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : JANUARY 18, 2010 Heard. There are some disputed questions between the parties. However, for the purpose of interim relief, the parties agree that Respondent No.2 – Mangal can come and stay in house at Nagpur, as before, along with the petitioner/plaintiff Kiran. Advocate Gaikwad appearing for Respondent No.2 Mangal states that Mangal is not interested in evicting the petitioner from the said house by using force. The petitioner also accepts that his brother – Respondent No.1 is residing on first floor in the house at Nagpur. In view of the statement made, it is apparent that respondent no.2 father and petitioner son can stay together at the Nagpur house as before. In view of the statement recorded above, it 2 is apparent that no interim orders are required at present. Considering the relationship between the parties, proceedings in Regular Civil Suit No. 1009/08 are expedited and the court shall attempt to decide it as early as possible and in any case by 31st December, 2010. Writ Petition is disposed of. JUDGE Rvjalit