THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN W.A. No. 60 of 2000 Judgment (per T Meena Kumari J) : This writ appeal was filed aggrieved against the order dated 1-09-1999 passed in W.P. No. 11410 of 1995 by a learned Single Judge of this Court, whereby the learned Single Judge while dismissing the writ petition observed that the Government may consider the representation of the petitioners. The appellants herein are the writ petitioners and the respondents herein are the respondents in the writ petition. The writ petitioners, who are the employees of the 2nd respondent A.P. FISHERIES CORPORATION LTD., filed the writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to implement the pay revision of 1993 w.e.f.1.4.93 on par with the employees of the other government employees and also to pay dearness allowance to them at the enhanced rates with arrears etc. It is the case of the writ petitioners before the learned single Judge that the benefit of the revised pay scales 1993 is not extended to them nor the enhancement of D.A. On the other hand it is the case of the respondent-Corporation that it is not in a position to pay any revised scales or enhanced D.A. and that the Corporation is depending upon the financial aid to be provided by the State Government. On hearing and upon perusing the material available on record, the learned Single Judge observed that nothing has been pleaded or urged at the bar to show that the State Government owes an obligation to extend grant to Corporation so as to enable it to pay higher salaries to its employees and therefore dismissed the writ petition. Learned counsel for the appellants tried to raise a contention before us that even though the appellants were retired, yet they are entitled the revised pay scales of 1993 and prays to set aside the order of the learned single judge. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondents in toto supported the orders of the learned single Judge and prays to dismiss the appeal. Heard and perused the material available on record. As seen from the material on record, in view of the fact that the appellants are seized to be the employees of the Corporation by virtue of their taking V R S, in our view they are not entitled for the said relief and therefore the order of the learned single Judge needs no interference. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. _____________________ T MEENA KUMARI J ____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN J Dated: 2-07-2008 kvrk 191 THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN W.A. No. 60 of 2000 (Judgment of the Division Bench made by Hon’ble Smt. Justice T Meena Kumari) 2 –07-2008