1 Appln 555-10 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.555 OF 2010 Gulzar Iqbal Khan ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.Kuldeep S. Patil, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.P.P.Shinde, APP, for the Respondent - State WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1853 OF 2010 Sarfraj Alias Sarro Mohammed ..Applicant Rafiq Attar V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.556 OF 2010 Gulzar Iqbal Khan ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.Sachin S. Punde, Advocate for the applicant in Cri.Appln.No.1853 of 2010 Mr.Kuldeep S. Patil, Advocate, for the Applicant in Cri.Appln.No.556 of 2010 Mrs.S.D.Shinde, APP, for the Respondent  State 2 Appln 555-10 CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 27TH SEPTEMBER, 2010 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. On 27th December, 2007 with some gap the applicants are alleged to have murdered Chikanya and Santosh, who were pick pocketrs operating in Pune & have been charge sheeted in different cases after completion of investigation. There are two witnesses who state that having seen the applicant, Guljar Khan taking Chikanya in Ricksha. As far as Santosh is concerned, two other persons had seen the applicants taking Santosh. Both Chikanya and Santosh were found murdered. Since charge sheet has already been filed, the learned trial Judge would endeavour to dispose of the case as early as possible and within a period of three months. The learned APPs 3 Appln 555-10 state that they would instruct their counter part in the trial Court and ensure that the witnesses are present on the dates on which trials are fixed. The learned Sessions Judge may not give an opportunity to the applicants to avail on the liberty which I am granting to apply, if the trial is not concluded within a period of three months. 3. Criminal Applications are rejected. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)