IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.17648 of 1999 Between: S.Sundara Rao, S/o. Nalaiah, Prop: of Avanthi Agencies, A.Annavaram, Shankavaram Mandal, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, East Godavari, at Kakinada. 2 The Joint Collector, East Godavari, at Kakinada. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapuram, East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court MAY be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent bearing REF.V5/CS/1001/99 dt.2.8.1999 as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents to drop all further proceedings against the petitioner in this regard. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.N.SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent NoS.1 TO 3: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri N.Siva Reddy, submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO,J) 07.06.2005 YS To 1 The District Collector, East Godavari, at Kakinada. 2 The Joint Collector, East Godavari, at Kakinada. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapuram, East Godavari District. 4 Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Civil Supplies, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. 5 Two C.D. Copies.