IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 20TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 29TH KARTHIKA 1929 CRP.No. 260 of 2004() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 14/11/2003 IN IA.316/2003 IN OS.58/2002 of SUB COURT,KOTTARAKKARA .................... REVN. PETITIONER: COUNTER PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF ---------------------------------------------- T.J.THOMAS THARAKAN, THEKKEPURAMBIL VEEDU, MAKKULAM, PATHANAPURAM VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF RESPONDENT: PETITIONER/DEFENDENT --------------------------------- P.MUTHUKRISHNAN, PARTNER OF ANUPAM, MAVELIKARA RESIDING AT NELLI BHAVAN, KAUDIYOOR, MAVELIKARA VILLAGE, MAVELIKARA TALUK REP. BY P.PICHAYYA REDDIAR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDR OF P.MUTHUKRISHNAN RESIDING AT ALINTE KIZHAKKATHIL, AMBIKA MADOM,KANDIYOOR MURI,MAVELIKARA VILLAGE. THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.Krishnan, J. ======================== C.R.P.No.260 of 2004 ======================== Dated this the 20th day of November, 2007. ORDER Notice not taken. Civil Revision Petition is of the year 2004. The order challenged is that of one setting aside the ex parte decree. So, in all likelihood the suit itself should have been over. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed and in any event if it is brought to the notice of this Court that it is still pending, the revision petitioner is given liberty to file an application for again considering the matter. M.N.Krishnan, Judge. ess 21/11