IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2010 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 37911 of 2010(L) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- K.P.MOHANAN, S/O.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, KODIKULATH HOUSE, KUMBALERI P.O., MEENANGADI VIA., WAYANAD. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE, JASAM COMPLEX, PINANGODE ROAD, KALPETTA, WAYANAD-673121. BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 37911 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 21st day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P10 direction. According to the petitioner, Ext.P10 has been issued based on a complaint and pointing out certain defects in their industrial establishment. It is stated that, immediately on receipt of Ext.P10, petitioner has rectified the alleged defects and reported compliance by Ext.P11. It is stated that despite the above, no orders have been passed on Ext.P10. It is in these circumstances, the writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P10. 2. I heard the standing counsel appearing for the respondent also. 3. Now that according to the petitioner, on receipt of Ext.P10 direction, they have rectified the defects and reported compliance by submitting Ext.P11, which is stated to have been acknowledged by Ext.P12, at this stage, what is required is that the respondent should inspect the industrial unit of the petitioner and if as contended by the petitioner, the defect has been rectified, necessary orders reviewing Ext.P10 will have to be WPC No. 37911/10 :2 : passed. 4. Therefore, I direct the respondent to inspect the industrial establishment of the petitioner immediately on service of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition and pass fresh orders in the matter as indicated above. It is directed that the aforesaid process should be completed at any rate within 2 weeks of receipt of the copy as above. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp