IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1014 of 2008. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1014 of 2008. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1014 of 2008. Kondiba Subharao Suryavanshi ..Petitioner versus Prakash Arjun Sutar & Others ..Respondents Mr.Vinod Jadhav i/b. P.M. Jadhav for the Petitioner Mrs.S.D.Shinde, APP for the State CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & R.Y.GANOO, JJ. R.Y.GANOO, JJ. R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED : 20th June, 2008. DATED : 20th June, 2008. DATED : 20th June, 2008. P.C. 1. We have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, who claims that his son Dattu did not die an accidental death and as per him it is a homicidal death. 2. The post mortem report is on record and it indicates the probable cause of death as "head injury and polytrauma". 3. We have seen from the record that at no point of time the petitioner has gone to the nearest police station and lodged the complaint, and directions are being sought in this petition -2- for investigation. 4. The petitioner should first approach to the nearest police station and file a complaint and we do not find any reason why the police will not register the FIR. 5. Hence, petition is disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to approach to the competent Court. (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (B.H.Marlapalle, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (B.H.Marlapalle, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (B.H.Marlapalle, J.)