AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.367 OF 2008 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.366 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.53 OF 2008 Shri Gopal Harkaran Tiwari ... Applicant Vs. Smt. Minisha Gopal Tiwari. ... Respondents None for the applicant. Mr. E.R. Naik and Ms. Varsha Shinde for respondent 1. Mr. M.M. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for respondent 2. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 24TH MARCH, 2009. P.C.:- 1. On 3/2/2009, neither the applicant nor his counsel was present. Respondent 1 and her counsel were present. We could have dismissed the applications on that day. But, in the interest of justice, we directed the respondent to give notice to the applicant as well as learned counsel for the applicant of the next date of AJN 2 hearing. Applications were adjourned to 17/3/2009. Learned counsel for the respondent states that as directed by the court, a telegram has been sent to the applicant-husband and a letter has been sent to advocate Manoj Bhat. From the postal endorsement made on envelop it appears that advocate Mr. Bhat has left the place where he was residing and, hence, notice could not be served on him. If the applicant-husband was informed about the matter, he should have remained present today. It is pertinent to note that these applications are shown on the board today. However, neither the applicant nor his counsel is present. Hence, the applications are dismissed. 2. On 10/4/2008, we had directed the applicant to deposit an amount of Rs.10,000/- towards litigation costs in this court. Office shall permit the respondent to withdraw the said amount. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [A.A. SAYED, J.]