^.^-^> Before Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisaarh At Bilaspur W. P.(S). HO.A/£6 1200Q J PETITIONERS A^>-- ^ ^'<?;',.- J'ss/ ..../f^ ^\y .'• ^•' ^' • ^ ^ ^^ ^ F" d^ : 1 Smt. Pushpa Hupendi Age about 32 year, W/o Shri shankar Lal Hupendi R/o-Vilalge- Kadme, Post- Koudisalebhata Tahsil - Pakhanjur, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) 2. HemLalRawate Ageabout29year, S/o Shri Deo Nath Rawate R/o-Vitalge- Dhurwatola, Post- Kusumkasa Tahsil - Balod, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) ^iM^^ ^-^^ f<-y.A»NA"vili ^ \^l^ smtBhuni Bai Age about 37 year, W/o Shri Rajkumar Jain R/o- Vilalge -Albelapara, Tahsil - Kanker, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS SOMKANT VERMA State Govt. ofChhattisgarh Through :-The Secretary Panchyat and Gramin Vikash Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt.-Raipur(C.G.) The Collector Kanker Distt. Kanker (C.G.) Contd..2.. ^*^is=.4»yig5^^;%'^:^.;.%^^^.. 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchyat Koylibeda, Distt.-Kanker(C.G.) y 4. TheChiefExecutiveOfficer, Zila Panchyat Kanker, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) / 5. TheCommissioner, J'ribalWelfare Department, Raipur 6. Block Education Officer Koylibeda, Distt. Kanker. WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARY ORANY OTHER LIKE NATURE ETC. ii. mGH COURr OF CHHXniSGARH AT BILA8PUR PEITHONER WRniPETmON(S)_NQ, 466 Qf2008 Smt. IPushpa Hupendi & Otfaers. ^ RESPONDENTS VERSUS State Govt. ofChh«tti^arfa&Otfaers. WRIT PEHnON UNDER AR1ICLE 226 OF THB CQNSIITU'IIONOJP IMDIA SB: Hon'bteShri Satlsh K. ^EiuGtotBl, J. Present: Shri Sc»nkairtVarma. Advocate A>r tife^ petitioticr. Shri Shashmk Thakur, Panel Lawyerferlfae State/respaident No.l,2,5and6. OKI)FJR(OttAL) (Passed on 27W day ofJaiie, 2011) 1. Leamed c<wnsel appeariiig fbr tfae petitionem. @n tastaxctionsi, se^ks penmssion of tfais Coiirl to withdraw Ihis petitidi with tiberty to taSt-e recourse to altemative statutwy tbnmi available to fhe petitioners under fhe provisions of section 13 of fte Clihattisgarh Panchayat Shila^ K^nm (Ri^snito^^ Ccmd^tens ofServices) Rules, 2007. 2. Leamed <x)unsel appearing fbr oth@r sida h^s no obj^tioit 3. It is ordered ac^ordingly. 4. Consequeatly, the writ ^tttion m dfesuatssed as withd-awa wilfa the afbrestated liberty. tf so advisedl However, 021 ttoe requ^t of leamed couiisel appearing for tiie petftioner, intortei relief granted earlier shall eontinue fbr a feriher p@riod ofcmeweek fi^Mntoday. Axmt Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge