IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION (1) Criminal IInd Bail Application No.6 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Ram Kumar ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party (2) Criminal Ist Bail Application No.118 of 2010 CRIMINAL SIDE Gyanendra ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party Both arising out of Case Crime No.59 of 2009, U/Ss 363/366/506 IPC, P.S. Jhabreda, Distt. Haridwar Dated: April 12, 2010 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. In both the bail applications, the applicants are related to the common incident and the matter to be decided in both the applications is also same, hence both of them are being disposed of by this common order. Heard Sri K.S. Verma and Mohd. Umar, Advocate for the applicants and Sri Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. GA for the State. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the incident was happened on 22.5.2009 and the FIR was lodged on 3.6.2009 i.e. after 12 days of the incident but the delay in lodging the FIR has not been explained. Further, the applicants had not taken the girl Km. Rubi rather she had gone with Shantar Pal and now they are living together as husband and wife. Lastly, the applicants are in jail since last nine months and they have got no criminal history and the trial has yet not been started. After considering all the facts and circumstances, on hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the contents of the FIR and other material on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicants deserve bail at this stage. Let the applicants-Ram Kumar and Gyanendra be released on bail on each of their executing personal bonds and also furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Haridwar. Both the bail applications are allowed accordingly. 12.04.2010 Rajeev Dang (Dharam Veer, J.)