IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30306 of 2011 Manish Kumar Verma, S/o Kaushlendra Kumar Verma. Versus The State Of Bihar ------------------ 02. 15.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 392, 307 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted that for fifteen months of misuse of privilege of bail the petitioner has remained in custody since 31.07.2011 and in the intervening period he has not committed any offence. Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-I, Supaul in connection with S.Tr. No. 124/08 arising out of Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 61 of 2008 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there 2 is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be physically present on each date of trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, his bail shall stand automatically cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)