: 1 : Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.2282 OF 2007 FIRST APPEAL NO.2282 OF 2007 FIRST APPEAL NO.2282 OF 2007 Chandrakant Dehu Bhagat ...Appellant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.R.P. Lote, Advocate, for the Appellant. Ms.G.P. Mulekar, AGP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATE : 21ST JANUARY, 2008. DATE : 21ST JANUARY, 2008. DATE : 21ST JANUARY, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocates appearing for the parties. The present Appeal is preferred by the appellant- claimant in a Reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. By the impugned judgment and award, enhancement in market value has been granted by the Reference Court in favour of the appellant. The appellant has not made any grievance in this Appeal as regards the rate at which market value is fixed by the Reference Court as well as the grant of statutory benefits by the Reference Court. His contention is that all the statutory benefits are not granted to the appellant-claimant in the award made under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. 2. I have considered the submissions. I have perused the award dated 10th September, 1986 made : 2 : under Section 11 of the said Act. The award grants statutory benefit of solatium under Section 23(2) and interest under Section 23(1-A) of the said Act. Therefore, the appellant is bound to get the said benefits as per the said award. 3. So far as impugned award passed by the Reference Court is concerned, it needs no clarification. The Reference Court has granted solatium under Section 23(2) on the enhanced market value as well as interest under Section 23(1-A) on the said enhanced amount. It is obvious that the interest under Section 28 of the said Act granted by the Reference Court is on the components of additional market value, solatium thereon and interest under Section 23(1-A) of the said Act. 4. Subject to clarification made above, it is not necessary to entertain the Appeal and the same is accordingly dismissed. [ABHAY S. OKA, J.] [ABHAY S. OKA, J.] [ABHAY S. OKA, J.]