S.A. No.444/2011 10.12.2011 Shri S.K. Gangwal, counsel for the appellant. He is heard on the question of admission. Record perused. JUDGMENT 1. This is plaintiff's appeal who has lost in both the Courts below. 2. It is not disputed that respondents No.1 and 2 are the real brothers of plaintiff/appellant. It is also not disputed that they are resident of Village Dhaturia. 3. Plaintiff instituted a suit alleging that the suit property (agricultural land) was his property and the respondents No.1 and 2 got the suit property mutated in their name illegally and started interfering with the possession of appellant. Plaintiff, 1 therefore, filed the suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction. 4. Learned trial Judge on consideration of evidence found against the appellant and it was held that in absence of any cogent documentary evidence to show that the suit property fell to the share of the plaintiff. It was held not to be his exclusive property. In view of the above, trial Court found no merit and substance in the suit and the suit was dismissed. 5. Matter was carried in appeal and the appellate Court after hearing rival submissions and going through the material available on record found no merit and substance in the appeal and the same was dismissed. Hence, this appeal. 6. We have heard counsel for appellant at length. Perused the record. 7. Counsel for the appellant reiterated that in absence of any order from the 2 revenue Court, name of respondents No.1 and 2 could not have been mutated. It is submitted that prior to 1996-97, Khasra entries show the possession of appellant over the suit property, therefore, Courts below erred in dismissing the suit. 8. We do not subscribe to the submission. Mere Khasra entry does not confer any title. It is well settled that Khasra entries are made only qua purposes of identifying the person liable to pay land revenue. Appellant did not adduce any cogent evidence in support of his title over the suit property, therefore, Courts below have rightly on proper appreciation of evidence dismissed the suit. The finding given by Courts below are pure finding of fact recorded on proper appreciation of evidence which does not give rise to any question of law much less substantial question of law. 3 Thus, we find no merit and substance in this appeal. 9. In view of the foregoing discussion, appeal fails and is hereby dismissed summarily. (S.K. SETH, J.) Alok/ 4