1 wp10469.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10469 OF 2010 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. S.S. Jadhavar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. L.V. Sangeet, Advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr. S.K. Tambe, A.G.P. for respondent no. 3. 1. Contention of Advocate Mr. S.S. Jadhavar for petitioner is that without effecting any service on petitioner-management the appeal before School Tribunal came to be decided. Mr. Sangeet for respondent no.1 (appellant before the School Tribunal) as also Headmaster who was respondent before the School Tribunal, has contended that notices in appeal were served upon the management as also upon the Headmaster and Education Officer. He relied upon the express observation made in paragraph no.2 of the impugned order. 2. It is apparent that there is some dispute about the 2 wp10469.10 observations made in paragraph no.2 by the School Tribunal, therefore, it is in the fitness of the petitioner to approach School Tribunal by making appropriate application in this respect. 3. Hence with that liberty to the petitioner, the present Petition is disposed of. No costs. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE. 18.02.2011 gas/wp.10