1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5677/2008. M/s.Auto Malleaable. VERSUS State of Rajasthan and Others. 01.07.2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Devendra Kumar ] Mr.Dinesh Kumar ] for the petitioner. ***** The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that this petition is similar in nature to S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5527/2008 filed by the same petitioner which came to be dismissed by this court vide order dated 30.05.2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner has produced a copy of the said order which reads as follows:- “By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the notice dated 25.02.2008 passed by respondent No.3 under Sec.9 read with Sects.30, 65, 58 and 69 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 (for short as “Act of 1994”). Against which, he has filed the objections, and one of the objections is of jurisdiction passed on the judgment of the Supreme Court reported in 134 STC 473 (Ashok Leyland Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr.). But the Assessing Authority has not decided the issue of jurisdiction. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I need not to enter into the merit of the case and I direct the Assessing Authority to decide the issue of jurisdiction after hearing the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.” 2 The prayer of the petitioner is that this writ petition may be decided in the light of the order dated 30.05.2008 passed in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5527/2008. Consequently, this writ petition is disposed of in the light of the order dated 30.05.2008. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.