1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2513 OF 2009 Sarfraj Haidar Tadavi and another Versus State of Maharashtra *** Mr. B. S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. K. M. Suryawanshi, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED: 9th SEPTEMBER, 2009. 1. Heard learned counsel and A.P.P. The applicants herein are salesmen in the cooperative society, at Dahigaon. Counsel informs that the main role in the affairs of the society, to maintain the accounts, registers and keep over all control, is resting to the Secretary and the applicants being salaried person, have no role in the so called misappropriation, at the society. 2. At this stage of the matter, the record illustrate several entries of sale of the fertilizers and other allied products meant for sale are not accounted 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. properly. In the control shop, the in-charge has also shown different figures for the period 2006-08 and the auditor found misappropriation of Rs.27,490/- and Rs.54,689/-. That apart, it is not an individual act of the present accused/ applicant as salesman but it is a network between the applicant and other associates which is required to be unearthed. In a systematic manner the racket was conducted. Consequently, no protection. Application rejected. The observations are prima facie in nature. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:09/09/2009. ans/2513