IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1390 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5049 OF 2004 Shri.Chotubhai Kasambhai Inamdar ...Applicant Versus Shri.Sadanand Dattu Barmukh & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Atul P.Vanarase for Applicant. Mr.S.J.Rairkar for Respondents 1 to 4. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JULY 11, 2008. JULY 11, 2008. JULY 11, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Having perused the Application, I am of the considered view that the application is not innocuous application, but the attempt of the Applicant is to protract the matter. The order under which the Applicant was required to comply with condition, was passed by this Court as back as on 29th June 2005, whereas, the present Application is filed only on 23rd April 2008. The facts mentioned in the Application do not take the matter : 2 : any further for the Applicant. The Applicant filed application before the lower Court but did not choose to question the correctness of the order passed by the lower Court on the respective Applications. Those orders have also become final. 2. Taking any view of the matter, no indulgence is warranted in the present Application. Hence, rejected. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.