IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10658 of 2010 ARJUN MOURYA & ORS . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 7-May-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the complainant. Upon the submissions of the parties, it appears that while the dispute between petitioner no.1, Arjun Mourya and his wife is subsisting, allegedly petitioner no.1 has married again and hence now there is no chance of compromise. Considering that it is a case under Section 498A and other Sections of the IPC and also considering the fact that allegations against petitioner nos.2 to 10 are general and omnibus in nature, their prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks, let the petitioners namely, 1. Kanchan Mourya, 2. Sunil Mourya, 3. Singhasan Mourya, 4. Shanti Devi, 5. Bhagawani Devi, 6. Sanju Devi, 7. Ram Upadesh Mourya @ Halla Mourya, 8. Ramayayan Mourya, 9. Shusila Devi be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua in Complaint Case No.488 of 2009/Tr. No. 1930 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. Considering the high handed act of the petitioner no.1, namely, Arjun Mourya in allegedly marrying again during the life-time of the first wife and other allegations his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)