IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.12796 of 2011 SUDAMA DEVI & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 25.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under sections 302, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioners accepted that father of the informant has dispute with the accused Mahesh Prasad. Though the petitioners were named in the F.I.R., but during investigation the accusation was found false and the final form was submitted against the petitioners. Learned Counsel for the State submits that the impugned order reflects that the evidences collected till para 35 considered by the learned court below which reflects the evidence of conspiracy against the petitioners also. Considering the facts that the accusation was found false during investigation, let the petitioners, namely, Sudama Devi, Mamta Devi and Sushma Sinha be released on bail 2 in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Noorsarai P. S. Case No. 79/2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. SKM (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)