IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.22 OF 2001 INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.22 OF 2001 INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.22 OF 2001 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City XIII. .. Petitioner V/s M/s.Ramkumar Jalan .. Respondent INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.36 OF 2001 INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.36 OF 2001 INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.36 OF 2001 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City XIII. .. Petitioner V/s M/s.Ramkumar Jalan .. Respondent INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.37 OF 2001 INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.37 OF 2001 INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.37 OF 2001 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City XIII. .. Petitioner V/s M/s.Ramkumar Jalan .. Respondent Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the Petitioner. Ms.V.B.Patel for the Respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. V.C.DAGA, JJ. V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATE : 20th March, 2007. DATE : 20th March, 2007. DATE : 20th March, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. All the aforesaid three Applications arise out of the common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the Assessment Years 1976-1977 to 1981-1982. It appears that with regard to the some Assessment Years the Revenue had filed Income Tax Applications which have already been dismissed for want of removal of office objections as far back as on 2nd March, 2004. Till date the Revenue has not taken any steps to get the said order set aside. The Revenue seems to have accepted the said order. In view thereof, all the above three applications stand dismissed. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)