THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.27563 of 2010 DT.08.11.2010 Between: Samuderpalli Rajanna … Petitioner And The State of A.P., rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.A.Jagan Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4: AGP for Revenue The Court made the following ORDER: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside proceedings No.14600/2010, dated Nil.10.2010, whereby respondent No.4 has issued notice to the petitioner on the application filed by respondent No.5 for rectification of entries in the record of rights. Sri A.Jagan, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that on his client approaching respondent No.4, the latter has rectified the entries in his favour on 18.10.2007 and that having done so, he is not justified in entertaining a further application from respondent No.5 and issue a notice to the petitioner. In my opinion, no order adversely affecting the interests of the petitioner has been passed so far by respondent No.4. Impugned proceedings are only in the nature of a notice traceable to the provisions of Section 3(3) of the A.P.Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (for short ‘the Act’) and Rule 16(2) of the Rules made thereunder. The petitioner is entitled to raise all legally permissible objections, including the one that the application filed by respondent No.5 is beyond the time limit prescribed under Section 3(3) of the Act. In these circumstances, I do not find any ground to entertain the writ petition at this stage, as the same is premature. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed, subject to the observations made above. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.35193 of 2010 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) Date: 08.11.2010. VGB