1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No. 22/2008 Sau Mamtadevi Prafullakumar Bhansali..vs..Sau Pushpadevi Kailashkumar Arawal -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. N. R. Saboo, Advocate for appellant Mr. A. S. Chandurkar, Advocate for respondent. CORAM: D. K. DESHMUKH AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATED : 1 st DECEMBER, 2008 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent/original plaintiff states that the document of balance confirmation letter will not be relied on by the plaintiff for any purpose. He, however, states that he may produce document to prove contents of that document. The Statement is accepted. 3. In view of this statement, as the document, in relation to which the application for permission to get the document inspected was made by the defendant, is not now relied on by the plaintiff, learned counsel for the appellant/ original defendant seeks leave to withdraw that application. The application is allowed to be withdrawn, in view of the statement, as a result of which the Letters Patent Appeal has also rendered infructuous. The L.P.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE kahale