IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) M.C.C.No. ^7/€ofJ^@e^— g^i^ ¥|Q^g| / ' . '^^^^ (Arisina out order dated 04-12-2009 passed in Second Appeal No. 126/91: "State of M.P. & 2 others Vs. Bhurmal Baradia) » APPLICANTS : 1. StateofM.P.Throughthe APPELLANTS Collector, Durg. ^^- .^-\K\"".^J^'2- Divisional Forest Officer, ^ ^ ^. ^••'°°''- ^ ^,^?^' ^ »»« Narainpur (P) Division Narainpur . .t€y: ^ ^y" RESPONDENT: DEFENDANT 3. Additional Tehsildar S.D.O. Forest,Durg Sub Division Versuse^^^\ Bhurmal-Badadia, S/o.Shri1 Late Pokharmal aged about 50 years, R/o. Sankri, Teh. And Distt. Durg. \.^\0 APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF THE SECOND APPEAL N0.126/91 TO ITS ORIGINAL NUMBER, --1 *11*ICT( w*11^» ^3^'^n^RW, ^f^ [®}<ni^li< M 6C- ^'o. <9^f° •-^200- ^n^r^^ (^351^r) 31T^F ^FT ^Jcb WT 3TI^?T $FRN? Kvr ^nw^teT^"^ S.B. Hon»bleShriJustice N,K. Adarwal 09-03-2010 Shri G.D. Vaswanj, ©.A.for^eapplJcants/State. Heard on I.A. No.01, appli^ation for condonation of delay in fillng the M.C.C. On due consideratlon, the ^rounds mentioneci fn the applteation, 1 am satisfject th^t the applteants have succeeded in explatning the cau^e of delay in fiting the M.C.C. Therefore, the apptication caused in fSling the M.C.C. is hereb Heard on M.C.C. The jnstant application is djrec|ed againsttte order ctated 04-12-2009 whereby S.A. No. 126/1^91 was dismissed fer non- prosecution. After golng through the detaite hearing jearned counsel for the applicjants, 1 am satisfied ttiat the applicants have succeeded in ©xplain|ngthe cause for thtr non- appearance.Jherefore, the appMcatioi|i is allowed and ttie a|^eal t is restored to ite original number. Let the copy of this order No.126/1991. ListtheS.A. N0.128/1991 after ^woweete. chl^fd^ ^W^ ^^^ <Ft^i< ^^rRp^^n^ js altowed and the elets^ 'condoned. |of the applieatjon and after be annexed with SA Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge ^i(«cft^sNhr gs^T^^, .^f-H<Frk —FS/147—2/201 o—i ,00,000.