IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50556 of 2008 SRIKANT PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 16.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is some explanation of false implication as each and every members of the mob shown committing some overt act and in that continuation the allegation is leveled against the petitioner also while he is 74 years old having 70% of blindness. Percentage of blindness can be for any reason because of medical treatment that can be never doubted to have no sight to fire from a close range. Petitioner has specifically been alleged for firing from very close range on the head and charing is also found in the post mortem report. Clean antecedent of the petitioner being a teacher is also of no avail where enmity is there in between both the families. So I find it not a fit case for anticipatory bail at all. Prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI