IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9168 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 18, 2010. Krishan Lal and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Vikas Chatrath, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.K.S.Sidhu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.K.S.Sidhu, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of the order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to seek any counter-reply from the respondents at this stage. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the petitioners' claim can be disposed of in terms of the order dated 25.2.2010 passed by this Court in CWP No.7464 of 2009 C.W.P.No.9168 of 2010 . 2 (Surinder Kumar and others versus State of Punjab and others). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 18, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE