IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4424 of 2008 SANJAY KUMAR CHOUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS WITH CWJC No.4456 of 2008 BINDESHWAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS WITH CWJC No.4547 of 2008 KHURSHID ALAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS WITH CWJC No.4724 of 2008 RAM DIN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS WITH CWJC No.4725 of 2008 UMESH CHANDRA JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR &ORS WITH CWJC No.4736 of 2008 KAUSHAL KISHORE ROY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS WITH CWJC No.4746 of 2008 RAM NARAYAN YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR &ORS WITH CWJC No.4749 of 2008 RAM KAILASH PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR &ORS WITH CWJC No.4750 of 2008 RABINDRA KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS WITH 2 CWJC No.8563 of 2008 AWADHESH MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS WITH CWJC No.8573 of 2008 RANGLAL BAITHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS WITH CWJC No.8808 of 2008 SURENDRA PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS WITH CWJC No.8845 of 2008 RAM PRIT RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS WITH CWJC No.8910 of 2008 MUKHDEO HAJRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS WITH CWJC No.8923 of 2008 SURENDRA RAUT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS WITH CWJC No.8980 of 2008 BASUDEO SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS WITH CWJC No.8981 of 2008 LALAN KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS WITH CWJC No.9184 of 2008 BABU LAL SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS WITH CWJC No.12839 of 2008 PRASANN KUMAR 3 Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS WITH CWJC No.11891 of 2008 SHIV SHANKER SARAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS WITH CWJC No.12956 of 2008 RAMASHISH PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS WITH CWJC No.14081 of 2008 SHIV NATH RAUT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS -------- 3 24.10.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State in all these 22 matters. The petitioners had challenged termination of their services in the year 2002 and 2003 through various writ petitions and the termination orders were set aside by orders passed in different writ petitions. The respondent State through its officials preferred Letters Patent Appeal in several similar matters and a Division Bench of this Court disposed of the Letters Patent Appeal and writ application by an order dated 26.6.2006 with a direction to the Government of Bihar to consider the cases of all the affected employees within six months with a view to find out on the basis of relevant facts and law as settled by the Constitution Bench of the Supreme 4 Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi and others, reported in 2006 (2) PLJR SC 363. Petitioners’ grievance is that their cases were not considered by the authorities of the Health Department and on consideration of cases of other employees, who were also terminated from service, some of the employees have been taken back in service after regularizing their service. The petitioners’ claim that they have not been aware of any decision taken by the authorities in respect of their cases which required to be considered in the light of Division Bench judgment dated 26.6.2006. It has further been submitted that in similar circumstances a batch of writ petitions bearing CWJC No.887 of 2008 and other analogous cases have been disposed of with certain directions by an order dated 9.7.2008. Petitioners want disposal of these writ petitions in similar terms. Learned counsel for the State has no objection. In view of aforesaid facts, these writ petitions are also disposed of in terms of order dated 9.7.2008 passed in CWJC No.887 of 2008 (Om Prakash v. State of Bihar) and other analogous cases. (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) sk