IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DECEMBER 2008 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 35668 of 2007(U) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- K.N.BHUVANESWARI, MANNUSSERIYIL HOUSE, AMALAGIRI P.O., KOTTAYAM-686036. (NOW WORKING AS ANIMAL HOUSE ATTENDER IN THE DEPARTMENT OF BIO-CHEMISTRY, SCHOOL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION). BY ADV. SRI.MOHAN IDICULLA ABRAHAM, SRI.MARTIN D.ALUMKARA, SMT.PUSHPY B.MURICKEN. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR, SCHOOL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, GANDHI NAGAR P.O., KOTTAYAM. 2. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O., KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 3. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR, SCHOOL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, GANDHI NAGAR P.O., KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/12/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.35668/2007-U: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE ORDER NO. SME/GNR/11049/97-98 DTD. 06/10/1997 ISSUED BY THE R.2. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE PROCEEDING NO. SME/GNR/E3/DA/2002 DTD. 03/03/2003 ISSUED BY THE R.2. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DTD. 13/07/2007 IN W.P.(C).13162/2007. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 22/11/2008 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO R.2. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.35668 of 2007 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 17th day of December, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner's complaint is regarding the order of the respondent University dispensing with her services. This contention of the petitioner is sought to be disputed by the learned standing counsel for the University contending that the petitioner was only a daily wager and that as her services were not required, the same was dispensed with. 2. Be that as it may, now that the petitioner submits that she has filed Ext.P4 before the 3rd respondent, I direct that if the same has been received, the 3rd respondent shall, consider the said revision, and pass orders thereon. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg W.P.(C.) No.35668 of 2007 2 The words “3rd respondent” occurring in the 2nd and 3rd lines of the 2nd paragraph of the judgment dated 17/12/2008 in WP(C) No.35668/2007 is corrected as “2nd respondent” vide order dated 02/03/2009 in I.A No. 2950/2009. Registrar (Judicial)