IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2613 OF 2004 Welcomegroup ... Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner Konkan Div. Mumbai Suburban District and others. ... Respondents Mr. V.P. Vaidya for Petitioner. Mr. G.W. Mattos, A.G.P. for Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO,J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 23, 2004 P.C. 1. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. It is the grievance of the Petitioner that against the order dismissing his appeal, he has preferred revision Application which is pending. The demand is for the sum of Rs.7,75,000/- in the matter of dues under the Bombay Entertainment Duty Act for running Disco. It is pointed out that in fact they are not running disco. It is not necessary to go into that controversy considering that the petitioners have statutory remedy at law which was available by way of Revision. But on account of ensuring elections, possibly cannot be available immediately, the ends of justice will be met if the following order is passed : 3. Respondents are directed not to act on the order dated 18.8.2004 pending the hearing and final disposal of the revision Application. The Petitioner’s’ application be disposed of within the period of four months from today. In the meantime, respondents are directed, if the cheque has not been encashed so far, not to encash the same. In the event revision is dismissed, it will be open to the respondent to encash the same. . Rule made absolute accordingly. . Personal Secretary to issue authenticated copy of this order. (F.I. REBELLO,J.)