HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.304 OF 2001 Date:08.07.2010 Between: Y.Y. Padma Priya … Petitioner and Vandrasi Ramarao @ Ramu and others … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.304 OF 2001 JUDGMENT: This revision is directed against the judgment dated 12.12.2000 passed by the learned III Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, in C.C.No.769 of 1999. 2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the defacto complainant filed a complaint before the V Town (Law and Order) Police Station, Visakhapatnam, against the accused, respondents 1 to 4 herein, alleging the offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC and the same was registered as Crime and after completion of investigation the police filed charge sheet and the same was taken on file by the learned III Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, as C.C.No.769 of 1999. During the course of trial, on behalf of prosecution, P.Ws.1 to 1 to 9 were examined and Exs.P.1 to P.5 and M.O.1 were marked. On behalf of defence, no oral or documentary evidence was adduced. After analyzing the said evidence, the learned Magistrate came to the conclusion that the prosecution failed to prove the guilt of the accused, and accordingly, acquitted them of the said offence by judgment dated 12.12.2000. As against the said judgment, the State i.e., the Sub Inspector of Police, V Town (Law and Order) Police Station, Visakhapatnam, did not file any appeal and hence the defacto complainant filed this revision invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 3. Heard both sides. 4. This Court admitted the revision and ordered notices to the unofficial respondents on 13.02.2002. As the notices sent to respondents 1 to 4 were not served, by an order dated 05.11.2009 this Court as a last chance permitted the learned counsel for the petitioner to furnish the correct address of respondents 1 to 4, failing which the Criminal Revision Case shall stand dismissed against the said respondents without reference to the Court and posted the case to 03.12.2009. Despite the same, the counsel for the petitioner did not furnish the correct address of respondents 1 to 4 and thus the revision in so far as respondents 1 to 4 are concerned was already dismissed on 05.11.2009. Now, the revision remains only against the State which is a formal party and no relief can be granted against the State. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. _____________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J 8th July, 2010 cbs HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.304 of 2001 (Dismissed) 8th July, 2010 cbs