1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION No. 2401/2010. The Superintending Engineer, Minor Irrigation . -: versus :- Sharad Samadhan Kandarkar Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JUNE 07, 2010. Heard learned A.G.P. appearing for the petitioners. He contends that directions issued to bring the respondent on CRTE is misconceived, as the necessary continuous service has not been established and employee was appointed initially only for a period of 14 days. With his assistance, I have perused the records. Though the initial appointment was only for a period from 22.06.1995 to 11.07.1995, the employee is continued thereafter and he has worked for more than 5 years. In view of this position, the learned Member of the Industrial Court has applied clause 28 of the Kalelkar Settlement and found him entitled to be brought on CRTE, consequential directions are therefore issued. It is settled position that Clause 28 does not require 2 completion of 240 days in each of the 5 years relevant for conferring that status. Relief granted is in view of this application of mind by the Industrial Court. No case is therefore, made out warranting exercise of writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is dismissed, with no order as to costs. JUDGE Rgd.