... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2372 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2372 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2372 OF 2005 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.1553 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL NO.1553 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL NO.1553 OF 2005 ...................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ...................................................... Mr Pratap Patil i/by B.R.Patil for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATE : MARCH 08, 2006. DATE : MARCH 08, 2006. DATE : MARCH 08, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Shri Patil appearing for the Applicant. Prayer for injunction in this Application relates to block Nos. 2604, 2607,and 2608. The perusal of the judgment of the Appellate Court shows that the Applicant had not pressed his case so far as block Nos.2607 and 2608 are concerned. So far as block No.2604 is concerned from August 2005, there is no injunction operating in favour of the Applicant. There is nothing on record to show that injunction as prayed in this Civil Application in respect of the said block No.2604 was operating during the pendency of the Appeal in the lower Appellate Court. Hence, prayer made in this Application cannot be granted. Civil ... 2 ... Application is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE