IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 17084 of 2010 Date of Decision: 22.9.2010. Bhupender Singla --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Pankaj Nanhera, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.D. Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana and Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate present in the Court have been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents no.1 and 2 to 4 respectively. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. A plot bearing no. 1351, Sector 52, Urban Estate, Gurgaon was re-allotted to the petitioner vide letter dated 17.7.2003. It is alleged that the possession of the same could not be delivered to the petitioner in view of the fact that there is a dispute regarding the plot in question. The petitioner made various representations (Annexures P-2 to P-4) for handing over the possession or allotment of an alternative plot. Petitioner has referred to certain instances, where alternative plots were allotted to the similarly situated persons. CWP. No. 17084 of 2010 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the representations made by the petitioner, referred to above. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take decision on the representations made by the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 22.9.2010. lucky