IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 55 OF 1990 IN PETITION NO. 303 OF 1990 Dattatraya Shrinivas Nerurkar. ... Plaintiff. V/s. Sharadchandra Shantaram Ajgaonkar... Defendant. Sachin Satpute i/b. Satpute & Co. for the plaintiff. None for the defendants. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 10th December 2007. DATED: 10th December 2007. DATED: 10th December 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The learned counsel for the plaintiff states that he has written two letters to the plaintiff; one dated 18th July, 2007 and another dated 22nd August, 2007. According to him, there is no response from the plaintiff. He is, therefore, unable to proceed with the suit. Both these letters are taken on record. 2. Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)