C.R. No. 7404 of 2011 (O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 7404 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: Dec. 1,2011 Jagjit Singh and others ................................. Petitioners Versus Simmi and others ...................................... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. R.V.S. Chugh, Advocate for the petitioners. ... RITU BAHRI, J. Challenge is to the order dated 17.11.2010 (Asnnexure P-7) passed by the Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Mansa, whereby the application filed by the defendants not to allow the plaintiff to produce additional evidence has been disposed of. Vide order dated 25.8.2009 the Appellate Court remitted the matter back to the trial Court for deciding the matter afresh. The plaintiff was allowed to exhibit Excerpt by recording statement of PW5 Dharampal, Naib Sadar C.R. No. 7404 of 2011 (O&M) [ 2 ] Kanungo. The precise grievance of the defendants was that except cross-examination of PW5 Dharampal, Naib Sadar Kanungo the Appellate Court had not given any permission to lead any other evidence. The trial Court had earlier allowed the plaintiff to exhibit the Excerpts by recording the statement of PW5 Dharampal, Naib Sadar Kanungo. The plaintiff was to prove that these Excerpts which are necessary for deciding the ancestral nature of the suit property. After examining PW5 Dharampal, Naib Sadar Kanungo and tendering the Excerpts the present petitioners reserve their right to cross-examine this witness. The order dated 17.11.2010 does not suffer any illegality or procedural lapse. Civil Revision is dismissed. 1.12.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE