IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.22422 of 2008 1. ARVIND SINGH, 2. Dilip Singh, both are sons of Sarjyg Singh, resident of village- Maniarpur, P.S.- Bidupur, District-Vaishali …Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & 2. Dilip Kumar Singh, son of Late Shiv Nandan Singh, resident of village- Maniarpur, P.S.-Bidupur, District-Vaishali …Opposite Parties ----------- 2/ 22.04.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners have sought quashing of the order dated 06.05.2008 passed by the Sessions Judge, Vaishali, in Sessions Trial No. 405 of 2007 by which he has rejected the application filed under section 227 Cr. P.C. It has been submitted that on the basis of the objective finding of the Investigating Officer that no offence under section 436 Indian Penal Code is made out and their case should not be tried by the Court of Sessions. In my view, no prejudice will be caused to the petitioners even if the charges are framed under section 436 Indian Penal Code since the trial court can amend the charge subsequently if the evidence so warrants. In view of such, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)