IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.18900 -M of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : AUGUST 19, 2011 PARDEEP KUMAR BANSAL & ORS. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS U.T. CHANDIGARH & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Mandeep Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Rajive Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Harminder Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that during the pendency of this petition, charges have been framed only against petitioner No.2. Petitioners No.1 and 3 have been discharged. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that let this petition be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to petitioner No.2 to challenge the order framing charges. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. August 19, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?