^ (^O^T INTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUM; AT BILASPUR (C.G.I WRIT PETITION NO.'3>S63 OF 2003 PETITIONER ....%^^ •^^5>-- ^^ Smt. Champa Bai Agrawal, W/o. Late Jogi Ram Agrawal, Aged about 65 years, R/o. Badi Bazarpara, Ratanpur, Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Collector (Land Acquisition) 85 Ex-Officio Dy. Secretaiy (Revenue), Bilaspur (C.G.) Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) 8s Land Acquisition Officer, Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Nagar Panchayat, Ratanpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Through its Chief Municipal Officer PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS^ DIRECTIQN OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR QRDERS: ilffii <[!BS» XI-HC-22 ia-i SII^f'^1 h-\M 3TRRI ?b^ll=t» yf^T »s --^ 'SVi -^W\v\tt, ^-S\W\S, hwiyy 3Tr^?r 'q?ra? •'v,- WHVfl grWtft St; 200 fc|'(i<8T' sii^i ^gTwaiOT whWi Sedion 18^4 8-10-2004 Shri Monindra Shrivastava, Shri Sanjay 5. Agrawal, fiovt^ Skri Ronbir Singh, counsel foit An opplication I.A. No.7280/^( of reapondarrts 1 to 3 in notification/declaration under has been niade without considerhig 5-A of -the Land Acquisition Act, I have heard teamed counsel Leamed counsel for respond^nts tlidt notifiuition/declanttion (Ann4xur Section 6 of ihe Land Acquisition lond without followin9 -the provisi(>ns Acquisition Act, therefore, they after foltowin9 tiie provisions of Act. In view of The submissioik respondents 1 to 3, the petition of (Amexure-P/8) noTification/declan»|)'jon Lond Acquisition Act is quashed to cc|unsel for the petitioner. Adyocate for reqsondents 1 to 3. reqiondent No.4. ^004 has been preferred on behalf it has been mentioned that 6 of 1+ie Land Acquisition Act ihe objections filed under Section wfe. +i<ilci'ii1'i 'wrcff'? fs^S <fa<$i< ^T SlfStiq 311^1 nn^xure for the parties. ^nts l to 3 submits that it is true ^xure-P/8) has been made under |AcT in respecr of the petitioner's of Section 5-A of +he Land |e ready to pass approprkite onter 5-A of -the Land Acquisition S^ction made by teamed counsel for ^he petitioner is allowed ond order made under Section 6 of •the extent of The petitioner's tand. •tihe XI-HC-22 xi-r a^a'^1 Ki-IL'* 311^1 5tiii'*^ri|^i •TSI ^iraRpi, 'g^a're, faciKiy ,''"r?'-y /•' ^/-" HI<4WI »*11<*) 3n^?r XR^ ,.;v.y::(5;...2.'3f^<?. "^ 2007 fc|*itff" sii^i'wnwHfei thbt tHe decide The respondents are directed declaration under Section 6 of first mstonce, -they diould petitioner as per •the provisiorjs Acquisition Act. In view of •this order, AA.(W' Nos.4328/2004. and 7281/2004: Parties are entitted for certtfied I»I<<K'I<<II imnl' 4 fs<zt <f»l^i< ^? sip<n sn^r in case stilt they want to make Lond Acquisition Act, Then in the the objections mised by ths of Section 5-A of the Land S+CBld ^.)P.Nos.3560/2003, 718/2004,1.A. disposed of. Ified copy of this order. Sd/- . L.C.BHADOO Judge +