IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.645 of 2009 Ashok Kumar Mehta . Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors . ----------- 2. 28.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The writ petition was filed on 13.01.2009. Nearly two and a half years later adjournment is sought to file counter affidavit. The Court declines the prayer. The writ petition raises a purely administrative issue thrust upon the Court in the form of a litigation which requires no adjudicatory orders deciding the respective rights and obligations of the parties. The petitioner is stated to be an employee of the Public Health Engineering Division. He was sent on deputation to the Building Construction Division from 1.2.1989 to 31.3.1991. He received his salary from the department of deputation. Simultaneously, the G.P.F. and Group Insurance scheme deduction were also made from his salary by the Building Construction Division. He was then sent back to his parent department, i.e. the Public Health Engineering Division. The parent employee kept writing to the Building Construction Division for transferring the 2 amount of G.P.F. and Group Insurance deducted from his salary. The deductions made were his property. It was purely an administrative function to be performed. The Department of deputation paid no heed whatsoever to the request made by the parent department time and again giving birth to the present litigation generating a cause where none really existed. No useful purpose is going to be served by this Court assuming the role of the administrator and giving directions for performing of administrative duties. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Building Construction Department is directed to ensure that the legitimate dues of the petitioner deducted from his salary are duly credited to his account in his parent department, within a maximum period of two weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before the Commissioner-cum-Secretary and for which he shall remain answerable to this Court for the nature of the litigation thrust upon the Court. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)