IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 45 of 2009 With Stay App. No. 546/2009 Sandeep Rathi, S/o Manveer Rathi. ........ Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ......... Respondents Mr. Mohd. Uma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. G.A. for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Nagesh Agarwal, Advocate for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Mohd. Umar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. G.A. for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Nagesh Agarwal, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 2. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. G.A., submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted final report against the petitioner before the Circle Officer concerned on 20.02.2009 and the same is likely to be submitted before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. The stay application stands disposed of accordingly. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 02.03.2009 V.K.