CMPMO 712 of 2008. 18.12.2008 Present: M/S Bimal Gupta and K.S.Kanwar, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. P.C.Sharma, counsel for the respondents. The defendants have approached this Court against the order dated 4.9.2008, passed on an application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure directing police help for implementation of the stay order dated 26.5.2005 and 24.10.2005. The learned trial Court held that by these orders, the Court had directed maintenance of status quo on the path which was subject matter of dispute in the suit. The allegations in the application were that the defendants had ploughed the path and sowed paddy crop therein with the intention to obliterate the existence of the path and to prevent the plaintiffs from using such path. The learned Court found the attitude of the defendants to be recalcitrant and proceeded to grant police help for implementation of the stay orders. Learned counsel for the defendants- petitioners submits that when the very existence of path was in dispute, no question of granting police help would arise. Secondly, the order of status quo is incapable of implementation. On the second submission, learned counsel places -2- reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court stating therein that the Court should clearly define as to what status quo means. The order, subject matter of this petition, cannot be described as one which is vague. The Court holds that the order passed was clearly with a view to prevent the defendants from appropriating the passage. Learned counsel submits that when the passage itself was in dispute, no stay order could have been passed. I need not go into these submissions, as these are questions which will be decided on settled issues during the trial. All that need be said is that the trial Court found a prima facie case in favour of the plaintiff while granting the stay order. The settled law is that police help can be provided to aid the enforcement of such orders. The apprehension expressed by the learned counsel that this order itself amounts to granting a right to the plaintiffs for all times to come cannot be accepted as that is subject matter of trial. This petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending application(s) shall stand dismissed. December 18, 2008 (PC). (Dev Darshan Sud), J.