IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.WP No. 11296 of 2011. [O&M] Date of Decision: 27th July, 2011. Hari Dev Petitioner through Mr. Baljinder Singh, Advocate Versus Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar & Ors. Respondents through Mr. C.L.Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] In this Civil Writ Petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the orders dated 1.10.2009, 05.07.2010 and 17.05.2011 [Annexures P-6, P-7 and P-9] passed by the Assistant Collector 1st Grade, Garhshankar,Collector, Garhshankar and the Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar respectively. These orders have been passed by the authorities under the Punjab Land Revenue Act in partition proceedings initiated by the contesting private respondents. The petitioner and respondent No. 4 both are real brothers and having regard thereto, they were persuaded to amicably resolve their dispute and get the joint properties partitioned through a compromise. Both the parties, with the concerted efforts made by their learned counsel, have settled the dispute through the compromise deed which has been placed on record and is marked as Mark 'A'. It is stated by learned counsel for the parties that respondents No. 5 to 12 have no dispute at all and as such the compromise shall have no bearing on them. The Compromise Deed has been duly signed by the parties as well as their learned counsel. As per the compromise deed, the land shown in green colour and marked with letters EFGHJK in the site plan, Annexure 'A' attached with the Compromise Deed has gone to the petitioner – Hari Dev and the land shown in red colour and marked with letters ABCDEFG has gone to respondent No. 4 – Prem Dev. Similarly, the land shown in green colour and marked with letters ABCDEF in the Site Plan [Annexure 'B'] has gone to the petitioner – Hari Dev and the land shown in red colour and marked with letters DEFGHJ has gone to respondent NO. 4 – Prem Dev. As regard to the tubewell which is presently installed in Khasra No. 628/1 and shown in yellow colour in the site plan [Annexure B] at Mark 'X', it has been resolved that the tubewell shall continue to be the joint property of the petitioner and respondent No. 4 and it shall be re-allocated/shifted at the place marked as 'Y' in the site plan [Annexure 'B'] within six months. The tubwell shall be installed at the said place after having proportionate contribution of the land and expenses by both the parties and it shall continue to be their joint property till they resolve otherwise mutually in future. Similarly, both the parties shall be entitled to irrigate their land from the tubewell at the present location 'X' till it is shifted at the place 'Y'. The passage for the tubewell shall continue to be common. The parties shall abide the terms and conditions of the compromise deed. Disposed of. Dasti. July 27, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE