IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13453 of 2008 CHANDRA SHEKHAR PRASAD @ TARNI PRASAD son of late Gorak Prasad, resident of village- Rajapakar, P.O. and P.S.- Rajapakar, Anchal- Rajapakar, District Vaishali Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Joint Director of Consolidation, Muuzaffarpur 3. Meena Devi, wife of late Pramod Prasad, resident of village Rajapakar, P.O. and P.S.- Rajapakar, Anchal- Rajapakar, District Vaishali ----------- 05/ 22.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and private Respondent no.3. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 12.7.1994, passed in Revision Case No. 514 of 1991, as contained in Annexure-6 to this application. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the aforesaid order dated 12.7.1994, Annexure-6 was passed without service of notice on him. In support of such contention, he has relied upon the information granted by the office of the Joint Director, Consolidation, Muzaffarpur, as contained in Annexure- 7 to this application. 4. Perusal of Annexure-7 indicates that the notice of the aforesaid revision case was not served on the petitioner. As the petitioner was not noticed in the said revision case and the order dated 12.7.1994, Annexure-6 was passed against his interest, he has filed this writ application for setting aside the said order when he has come to learn about the said order. 5. Having heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the Respondent no.3, Meena Devi, who was 2 petitioner in Revision Case No. 514 of 1991, order dated 12.7.1994, Annexure-6 is set aside and the matter is remitted back for fresh hearing on merits with direction to the petitioner and Respondent no.3 to appear before the Joint Director, Consolidation, Muzaffarpur, Respondent no.2 on 15.2.2010, whereafter the learned Joint Director, Consolidation, Muzaffarpur, Respondent no.2 shall fix a date for hearing of the matter and proceed to hear the revision case and dispose of the same as early as possible, in any case within three months from the date of their appearance. This order is being passed considering the fact that the revision petition is of the year 1991. 6. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)