IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 15TH MARCH 2010 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 950 of 2009(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.14227/2009 Dated 19/06/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.V.ANILKUMAR, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.T.N.VASUDEVAN PILLAI, LECTURER, SHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY & APPLIED SCIENCES, M.G.UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.N.DHARMADAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE SMT.D.P.RENU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- PROF. RAJAN GURUKKAL, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,AGED 60 REGISTRAR, M.G.UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN, AG. C.J. & C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... C.O.C. No.950 of 2009 .................................................................... Dated this the 15th day of March, 2010. JUDGMENT Raman, Ag. C.J. The contempt alleged in this case is that though the learned Single Judge has by judgment 19.6.2009 directed the respondents to consider the representation made by the petitioner in accordance with law, the Syndicate on the very same date by Ext.P13 rejected the petition without considering the claim and as such it amounts to contempt. The petitioner submits of having filed a third case challenging the order passed. As such there is no case made for contempt. The correctness of the consequential order is not a matter to be agitated in a contempt matter. In the circumstances, Contempt Case is dismissed. P.R.RAMAN Acting Chief Justice C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms