1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL WRIT No. 2851 of 2005 GURDARSHAN SINGH & ORS. V/S STATE & ORS. Mr. BASTI CHAND, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. OP BOO, A.G.A., for the respondent Date of Order : 25.1.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- This petition has been filed on 10.5.2005 and vide order dated 8.8.2005 while issuing show cause notice, it was directed that the petitioners may submit their representation before the competent authority in response to Annex.1, and those objections will be considered on merits. Learned counsel for the petitioner was asked, as to whether any representation has been made, if made, when? But learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to reply. Learned counsel for the respondent has produced Annex.R/1, from perusal whereof, it transpires that it is an order of the Court of learned Additional District Judge dated 9.9.2005 deciding number of applications filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 in about 10 cases on merits, and from the cause title of those suits, it appears that some of the family members of the petitioners were parties in the 2 litigation. By this order, Annex.R/1, the application for temporary injunction has been dismissed, wherein a relief was claimed to grant a temporary injunction not to change the size of the outlet. It is also contended by learned counsel for the respondent that the outlets had been changed after consideration of the matter by the Committee of experts, and in accordance with law. In these circumstances, I do not find any sufficient ground to entertain the writ petition. The same is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/