IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48441 of 2008 1. JHULA LAL MAHTO @ JHULA MAHTO 2. BATORAN MAHTO 3. PRABHU MAHTO 4. KAILASH MAHTO 5. RAM BALAK PODDAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.12.2008 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a complaint case under Sections 436, 440 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel submitted that the complaint conceals that the complainant and the petitioners are own brothers. That there is a property dispute between them with more than one litigation. These have been acknowledged in the statement on S.A. which further states that it was only the doorframe which was partially burnt when the allegations are of the house having been burnt. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Begusarai in Complaint case no. 1195 C/07. AKS/- (Navin Sinha,J.)