IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 20439 of 2010 Date of decision : 25.02.2011 Balbir Kaur ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sartaj Singh Gill, D.A.G., Punjab for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Nemo for respondent No.4. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned State counsel has produced a letter bearing No. 204 dated 02.02.2011 intimating the petitioner and ignoring the impugned resolution (Annexure P-2) that she will continue to work as a Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Phulokhari, Block Talwandi Sabo, District Bathinda. 2. Faced with the situation, learned counsel for petitioner intends to withdraw the instant writ petition. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Needless to mention, if respondents attempt to implement the impugned resolution (Annexure P-2) then petitioner would be at liberty to file fresh writ petition in this regard. February 25, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge