/^. t^-r ;e IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU R WRIT PETITION fS) N0. ^fO^?- OF 2011 PETITIONER ..^y:^-^l •'f-y\^ ^ Bagarsai Sonwani, son of Late Sukhdev Ram, aged about 55 years, resident of Muktipara, Fundurdihari, Ambikapur, District- Surguja (Chhattisgarh) A'^V-' ••'•w'"'' RESPONDENTS ^-,;,..-- VERSUS 1. State ofChhattisgarh, through: the Secretary, Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 2. Under Secretary, Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. Collector, Surguja, Ambikapur, District-Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 4. Superintendent, Land Record, Ambikapur, District-Surguja (Chhattisgarh) WRfT PEm-ION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA '•H'-iL y^. "%.* r IL •^asss.. 'xi-HC—78 31I^r ^iT ft-ijsh 'tTSff 3Tf^T sti*l T? ~3^S ^FTI^FT, •^^RTTS, feWT3T ^.........^.P..:w...(^..:^l ww^ 3T^?I T^i C^f3»T^) T' TRIIW: flftTf OT^!I >% ShriV.K.Paadey, couasel Shri Praveen Das, Dy. G.^ Grievance of ftie petitionej vide oider dated 5.2.2011 (Aniil proinoted on fbe post of Nai^ Revenue Inspector but tffl date ^e has not becn reUeved to join his pjace ofp petitioner is for issuance of The limited prayer of thi direction to fhe responden^s to decide the pendia| repi^sentetion ofthe petitioner <jlated 14.2.2011. State couasel submits petitioner along with three ott^er persons, in the proiuotion order Clause 3 & 4 put certas^ tbat inay be the reason for not r\ Counsel for the petitione^ not applicable to hini because agamst him. The present petition is di^ petitioner to file a fresh repre^entation before ttie resp. No.3 witbia ten days froia the date {sf receipt of copy of ttais orier aay such repiesentation fhe resp. No.3 shaU pass appropr^ate order within further three weeks ia accoriance with law. Sd/- 1 Pritinker Diwaker S'f 'wrcff 'ii fwl- •(TSR$R ^flfgiT3:niw foT fhe petitioner. ,. for the State. ^ in tlie present petitioa is that exure P/1) though he has been a Tahsildar froiu fhe post of fhat while promotmg fhe riders for the authorities and slieviag the petitioner. subnuts that Clause 3 & 4 is iio D.E. whatsoever is pendiaj posed ofwith a direction to the Judge p'^