@ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ‘ S.B. : HON’BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITION {S) No. 4022 0f 2005 Vidyaprasad. Tiwari, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Sonwahi, Education District Surajpug District Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS : 1, State of Chhattisgarh through - Secretary, School Education Department Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) . Ccllcctog DiStrict Surguja, (C,G,) 3. District Education OErcer, Education District Surajpur Surguja goo.) PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Prosent: None appears for the pctitioncr, Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Government Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on 19E March 2007) The petitioner, while working as Assistant Teacher at Government Primary $chool Sonwahi, Deveiopment Biock Surajpug District Surguja, Was transferred to Governmem‘ rimary School Kartamaonfthc same terms and conditions vide mpugned order dated 03:102001 (Annexure All ). / /, P i 7A Ths Madhya Pradesh Administrativc Tribunal at Raipur vid§ interim order dated 19,10,2001 directed to maintain statu5 quo in regard m the position of the petitioner as wa$ prevailing on 12,102001, By virtue of the interim order the petitioner is continuing atthe originai place of posting. U) "’r Be that as it .mayt with the passage of time thin petition has become infruetuous as period of transfer is not applicable forever. At this point oftime, there is no queStion to examine the validity of the transfer order. However, the respondents are at ’ ‘ liberty to pass appropriate order keeping in View the public interest and administrative exigeney, without insisting on oompiiance of the impugned transfer order. It is weii settled principie of law that transfer is an incident of serviee and it is for the employer to decide as to where a particular onion/employee be posted, keeping in View public I interest as weil as administrative exigeney. This Court has limited jurisdiction to interfere in the transfer matter and this Court can interfere only in the case of proved maiahde, non— eomoetenee of authority passing the transfer order and transfer rder not being in conformity with the rules and regulations. In View ofthe above, this petition stands disposed of. No order as .to costs. sd/— v‘ Satish K.Agnihotri i ‘ r Judge . i t i n, WW, W", l o