:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPICATION NO. 6280 OF 2005 APPICATION NO. 6280 OF 2005 APPICATION NO. 6280 OF 2005 .......................................................... Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearance, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and orders Registrar’s orders .......................................................... Mr. P.R. Arjunwadkar for the Applicant. Mr. J.M. Puranik, for the Respondents. Mr. U.V. Nikam, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. : A.S. OKA, J. : A.S. OKA, J. DATE: DATE: DATE: 08TH SEPTEMBER 2006 08TH SEPTEMBER 2006 08TH SEPTEMBER 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. Heard Advocate appearing for the Applicant. The learned Advocate appearing for the Respondent No.1 to 3 strongly opposed this Application. 2. After having heard Advocates appearing for the parties and after considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that delay deserves to be condoned. 3. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer Clause (a). JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE