WP(C) 1494/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. SARMA Heard Mr. S.Parasar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. H. Phukan, learn ed Govt. Advocate for the State respondents. The grievance of the petitioner is that he is the owner of a vehicle bearing Reg istration No. AS-12-E/1275 and said vehicle was requisitioned by the respondent authorities in violation of the Section 4(1) of the Assam Requisition and Contro l of Vehicle Act, 1968. It is further alleged that the earlier requisitioned bill has not also been clea red by the authority concerned. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties and as agreed to by the learned cou nsel for the parties, the similar dispute raised in this case has been settled b y the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Suren Ch. Das -vs- State of Assam and others reported in (2005) 2 GLJ 1. In view of the above and as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, th is petition stands disposed of with a direction to release the vehicle of the pe titioner forthwith and further it is directed that in the event of requisition o f the vehicle of the petitioner, in future, the authority concerned would be ent itled to do so following the provision of law as laid down in the above cited ca se. It is further directed that the requisition amount of Rs.4,120/- stated to have been not yet cleared by the authority concerned, shall also be cleared by the c oncerned respondent authority. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of.