§ 4’2u%\’&:\%p16 ”. $4 .....‘9 "‘g;""‘x(\e...z.>:1& .............. /@ ”“wn .n / “19‘1““. a? \ a,QI/\ /~ S‘ng!9 Wm‘w IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (8.) No‘qz'59 /201 1 / PETITIONER Kalyan Singh aged about 2O years, S/o Late Dharampal Singh R/o Village Banjaridad, Thana and Tahsil Khadgawa, Distt Koriya (C.G.) VERSUS s RESPONDENTS 1. South Eastern CoalField Ltd. through / its Chairman cum Managing Director, Seepat Road, Bilaspur 2. /Deputy Chief Personal Manager, Chirmiri Area, Chirmiri, Distt. Koriya 3. / Senior Personnel Officer, Dumanhill Group, Chirmiri, Distt. Koriya WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE ’ CONSTETUTION OF INDIA. 3E? imam. m fam SB : HQN’BLE MR. gUS’I';CE PEITINKER DIWAKER 14.09.2011 Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate for the petitioner. Shrfl P. S. Koshy, vocate who normany appears for the respondents pr sent in Court is directed to appear on behalf of the r spondents. s Grievance of the p-titioner is that his father iate Dharampal Singh wh was working as Dresser Category-II died on 17.0 .2000 whiie he was in service. According‘to the petitioner the monetary compensation in lieu of employment to the dependent was granted to his mother by the respondents. On 10.08.2004 his mother had also expired‘ and therefore the petitioner is entitied for the compassionate appointment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representations are perding before respondent No.2 and purpose of filing this petition would be served if direction is issued to respondent No. 2 to decide the pending representation of the petitioner as early as i possible. mw..£s... 3q[ H m FE 200 mm (Wu) 31%?!3'1Ww'3; am m m mumm mi?! :ntra‘w‘ § fgvz"; (wax $ aim 3mm Learned counsel a the representation to respondent No.2 giving reference to the previous represent documents and the sa accordance with law if nc g Accordingly, the p submits that iet ietition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent No.2 and in the eventuality oi the same would be decided by the concerned authority, if already not decided‘ expeditiously as possible It is made clear th any opinion on the merii concerned would be representation of the with law after due scrutir at to decide titioner strictly in accordance iy of the ) ppearing for the respondents petitioner make a fresh ations and all other related me would be considered in it already decided. within three weeks from today =filing any such representation in accordance with law as at this court has not expressed :s of the case and the authority the liberty facts. Sdlr nker Diwaker Judge Prit'l 3a mm mimic feareig ” W m...w.:.§:.$§2m.37::$7{ F‘L 200 my! m (Wu) wwfm mm m mu 1am m W WW ‘ f??? (ma % aim 311w