IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1824 of 2010 HARI KISHUN RAM SON OF LATE RAM BRIKSHA RAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHARMAGAT PARASI, POLICE STATION KARAKAT, DISTRICT ROHTAS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, KARAKAT, DISTRICT ROHTAS. 4. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BIKRAMGANJ, DISTRICT ROHTAS. 5. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, BIKRAMGANJ, DISTRICT ROHTAS. 6. RAM NARAIN PANDEY. 7. SURESH PANDEY. 8. SUNIL PANDEY, NOS.6 TO 8 SONS OF BISHWANATH PANDEY. 9. BISHWANATH PANDEY, SON OF LATE RAMCHANDRA PANDEY. 10. USHA DEVI, WIFE OF LATE RAMESH PANDEY, ALL RESIDNETS OF VILLAGE GORAKH PARASI, POLICE STATIOIN KARAKAT, DISTRICT ROHTAS AT SASARAM. ----------- 02. 02.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner is apprehending that his name in the consolidation records with regards to the lands in question detailed in paragraphs-5 and 6 of the writ application shall be struck off on the basis of the order dated 30.10.2001 passed by the Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna in Consolidation Revision Case No.497 of 1997, Annexure-3. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in the aforesaid consolidation revision case petitioner was not even impleaded as party respondent and the order passed in the said revision case cannot be the basis for striking off the name of the petitioner from the consolidation records with respect to the lands in question. 4. Let petitioner take the aforesaid objection before the Consolidation Officer, Karakat, Rohtas, who should examine the matter and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a reasonable time. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)