IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE 31st DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6150 OF 2010 Between: A.Lakshmi Kameswari … Petitioner And A.Lalitha Jayasree and others … Respondents This Court made the following: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6150 OF 2010 ORDER: - This revision under Article 227 of the constitution is filed to revise the order of the IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Fast Track Court, Vijayawada made in I.A.No.721 of 2006 in O.S.No.616 of 2000, dated 20.02.2007, wherein the application filed for appointment of receiver as per orders in I.A.No.120 of 2006, dated 29.04.2006, for the management and securing the income out of the plaint schedule property, has been allowed appointing an Advocate Commissioner as a Receiver for management of the plaint schedule property. Though the present revision petition is filed with an application to condone the delay in representing the C.R.P., in the year 2007, the petitioner has not evinced any interest to see for obtaining any necessary interim orders. In the process, the Receiver appointed through the impugned order took steps to collect the rents and the suit has now been transferred to the Court of III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada and the same was numbered as O.S.No.1063 of 2009 and the said case was posted for cross-examination of D.Ws.2 to 4 on 23.01.2011. When the plaintiff’s evidence is already closed and the suit is coming up for cross-examination of D.Ws.2 to 4, there is no necessity to disturb the order, which is not in operation since more than three years. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J December 31, 2010 lmv