AJN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.708 OF 2007 Tarachand S/o. Shripat Sonowane ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Anilkumar K. Patil for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Mhambrey, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & D. B. BHOSALE, JJ. DATED : 25TH APRIL, 2007. P.C.:- 1. We have heard Mr. Patil, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Mhambrey, the learned A.P.P. appearing for the State. 2. The case of the petitioner is that his son is not traceable. He has expressed some suspicion about respondents 4 to 6. 2. Our attention has been drawn to the complaint/application filed by the petitioner in the Chhavani Police Station dated 15/12/2006. In that complaint, he has stated that his son has contacted him on two occasions and told him that he would be coming back on 20/11/2006. However, he did not come AJN back. Thereafter, he again told the petitioner that he will be coming back between 25/11/2006 and 26/11/2006. However, he did not come back as promised. This indicates that the petitioner's son was in contact with the petitioner. We are informed by the learned A.P.P. that steps are being taken in connection with the missing complaint and the efforts will go on. 3. So far as the complaint lodged by the petitioner against respondents 4 to 6 at Chhavani Police Station is concerned, we expect that the concerned officer of the Chhavani Police Station to take necessary steps in accordance with law in connection with it. The concerned officer of the Chhavani Police Station shall also look into the apprehension expressed by the petitioner that there is some danger to the life of the petitioner's son. The petition is disposed of. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [D. B. BHOSALE, J.]