IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7572 of 2009 MD.IFTEKHAR AHMAD @ MD.ATIQUE @ MD.IFTEKHAR KHAN, Son of Late Md. Allauddin, resident of Bus Stand Gali, Behind Mathura Darwaja, P.S. Mathura Darwaja Virindawan, District – Mathura (U.P.). …. Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ….. Opp. Party With Cr.Misc. No.12058 of 2009 1. FAROOQUE AHMAD, Son of Late Md. Allauddin, resident of village Bara, P.S. Chandauti, District – Gaya. 2. Rukhshana W/o Gulam Subhani, D/o Md. Allauddin, resident of village – Paraiya, P.S. Belaganj, District – Gaya. …. Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …. Opp. Party. ----------- 02/ 30.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioner of Cr. Misc. No. 7572 of 2009 is the husband of the complainant Parveen Khatoon and petitioners in Cr. Misc. No. 12058 of 2009 are the close relatives of the husband of the complainant. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner husband of the complainant that notwithstanding the allegations contained in the complaint he is always ready and willing to continue the matrimonial relationship with the complainant and for that purpose he shall file written undertaking in the court below within four weeks from today. No sooner such an undertaking is filed by the petitioner husband of the complainant, the petitioners, above named, be admitted to the privilege of provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 1470 of 2008 and notice be issued to the - 2 - complainant. After she appears in the proceeding petitioner husband should persuade her to come back to the matrimonial fold along with the children. In the event dispute is resolved or complainant is back in the matrimonial fold or she is found to be unreasonable, provisional bail granted to the petitioners be confirmed, failing which court below shall be at liberty to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law considering the reasonableness of the stand of the parties. It goes without saying that if the complainant does not respond to the notice issued by the court below in terms of this order, then court below shall proceed in the matter after being satisfied that having served with the notice she is not responding on account of some ulterior motive. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioners. DKS/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)