IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.68 of 2009 MD.IDRISH SON OF LATE MD. SIDDIQUE, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- CHAKDAH, P.S. RAJNAGAR, DISTRICT- MADHUBANI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE SUGAR CORPORATION LTD., PATNA UDYOG BHAWAN, EAST OF GANDHI MAIDAN, PATNA-1 3. MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIHAR STATE SUGAR CORPORATION LTD., PATNA, UDYOG BHAWAN, EAST OF GANDHI MAIDAN, PATNA-1 4. JOINT LABOUT COMMISSIONER-CUM-APPELLATE AUTHORITY, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA-1 5. DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER-CUM-CONTROLLING AUTHORITY, UNDER PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972, RAY SAHAB TANK, LAHARIASARA, DARBHANGA 6. GENERAL MANAGER, BIHAR STATE SUGAR CORPORATION LTD., UNIT LOHAT, MADHUBANI. ----------- 8 11.02.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the Corporation and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to payment of gratuity amount which has not been paid despite the same has been adjudicated as per the order passed in G.A. No. 03 of 1992. Learned counsel appearing for the Corporation submits that the admissible payment on account of gratuity shall be paid to the petitioner without delay as per the law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his claims, petitioner proposes to place his grievances before the respondent no.3 by way of a representation. It is, accordingly, directed that on receipt of such representation from the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today, the respondent no. 3 shall consider the same and shall also make payment of the admissible payment on account of the gratuity to the petitioner expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the admissible dues could be paid to the petitioner along with statutory interest. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)