1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.2557 OF 2003 HDFC Ltd. .... Plaintiff. V/s Sangani Narendra Madhusudan & Ors. .... Defendants. Mr. Sanjay Udeshi i/b Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for plaintiff. Mr. K.M. Sangani for defendant No.1. Ms Manju Sharma i/b A.V. Doijode for defendant No.2. CORAM: V. M. KANADE, J. DATE : 18TH JANUARY, 2010 P.C.:- 1. Plaintiffs and Defendants have settled their dispute. They have filed the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked “X” for the purpose of identification. The Consent Terms are signed by Plaintiff’s representative, by Defendant No.1 and by their respective advocates. Defendant No.2 is a guarantor. No relief is claimed against Defendant No.2 in the Consent Terms. Hence, Defendant No.2 has not signed the Consent Terms. In view of the Consent Terms, suit against Defendant No.2 does not survive and Defendant No.2 is deleted from the array of the parties. 2 2 Decree is accordingly passed in terms of the Consent Terms. Plaintiff would be entitled to refund of court fees as per rules. 3. Suit is accordingly disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms as against Defendant No.1. 4. Parties shall act on the authenticated copy the consent terms. 5. Issuance of certified copy expedited. (V.M. KANADE, J.) 3