)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1563 of 1986 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.C.SRIVASTAVA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- SURESH J PATEL Versus MAHESHKUMAR K VITHALANI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR SURESH M SHAH for Petitioner NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 1, 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE D.C.SRIVASTAVA Date of decision: 28/07/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. This is a revision application under section 115 of Civil Procedure Code against the order of the trial court. Shri M.S.Shah representing the revisionist has stated that he had telephonic communication with the revisionist's counsel in the lower court on several occasions, but no oral or written instruction has been received by him either from the advocate representing the revisionist in the lower court or from the revisionist directly. With a view to enable the revisionist to get the suit expeditiously decided by the trial court he has requested to withdraw this revision. This revision is permitted to be withdrawn. The revision is therefore dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. 28.7.2000 (D.C.SRIVASTAVA,J)