r Sr. isio Date %09,03.2005 Orders 3il Present: M- M.R.S]ianished for the petitioner. t.1s.Meghalee BarthaJcur for the respondent. +I.A., No.]S2.fi/n Application has not been jointly moved by pailies. It is ^■ordhtgly treated as an application tinder Order XXIII Rnle C.P.C. Application has been signed by the representative of the petitioner. It is sttpported With the affidavit of the Managing Director of fte petitioner. As per the application, parties have settled flteir dispMes and have recorded the tertns of the settlement in the settlement ageemen, dated 3,3.2005. Prayer made in the application is that the petition may be disposed of in terms of the settlement between the parties.' Learned coiiiisei for the respondents affirms the settlement between the parlies. On 7,3.2005.1 had disposed of 2 execmion petitions and one OMP between the parties in which same settlement agree,nent was relied ttpon for purposes of disposal of the said 3 proceedings. LA. is accepted, OMP No.247/?.nnt .In view of the order passed above in LA.2618/05, the OMP is dtspo.sed of as infructuous. holding that the parties would be bound by tlie SACHKHAND PRINTERS 01/05 ^ parties liave cnrnDroirii^u^rl Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified Sr. No. Date Orders the disputes, no adjudication is required. V y -rl March 09, 2005 as PRADEEP.NANDRAJOG, J SACHKHAND PRINTERS 01/05 Jd