IN THE HON'BLE CHHATTISGARH HiGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR PETmONEB: VERSUS WRIT PCRTtON N§. S 2002, Anhika Prasad Tiwari S/o Late Ramsujan Tiwad, aged about 35 years, R/o Near Priiamaxy school, Kiuidarapara, Gudhiyari, Raipttr, Tahsil & Dist: Raipur, Chhatti^arh. Gl.State of Chhattisgarh, Throiigh it's Prmcipal Secretary, Dept. of Home Affairs, State Secretariat, DKS Bbawan, Raipur, Chhattiggarh. 02. Supdt. ofJail, Ceiitrat Jail, Raipur, Cbhattisgarh. \.j^y^ Writ Petition under article 226 of the constitution oflndia. .^£L..<-- 1 XI-HC-22- ^ ^j^^^-y'iso^Kiwy aiT^T tR^ y.^.^.:...^ ''WI. 200 3'I^f^I fi^iwant^ gTRRT^feT counlsel \1 pe1|ite iS respoijtdent Slie 111,08.2003 Siat-Soinshukla Sarkar, Ku. Sofia. Khan, Dy.Govt.Advo^ Heard. This petition Iias been flled t>f respondents. It is submitted that| le post of Warien as far 'back iu. iaipur (Anaesure P-1) aad the ^iostkig ordcrs thcreof tfll date. It i^ ^ursuing the laatter with I. . . . iubiaittEd several representations iction has been taken tiU date. lelay on ffae part of respondents is 1 Having coiisidcrcd thc facts fend material on record aad the fnfonned to have been selected on fhe year 1989 (Annexure P-1) aad| prders thereof tiU today, in fhe ^>j justicc wiU bc servcd if the pctiti^: letaUed representation alongwith a reeks from today beforc the ^nd on such representatk>n puthorily/respondent no.2 shaU ^epresentation by passing a rcasonc^l ', as early as possible preferabl^ tHe +ll!rl41-<'[ffERif'qf3^tf»t^l< ^'3if:gir3ii^r for the petitioner. ;ate for fhe State/respondents. agamst fhe iaaction. on fhe part the petitioncr was selected for fhe year 1989 in Centi-al Jafl eljitioiier has not yet been given subinittcd fhat he has becrt no.2 since 1989 aad td fhe respondents, but no submits that fhe iaorduiate iliisustaiaable. And circuiustaaccs of fhc casc |fact that fhe petitioner was Post ofWarden way back ia has not been issued Posting 4>piiu.on of this Court ends of ijoncr is pcrinitted to make a (jopy ofthis petition within two 'respondent No. 2 ^eiag filed, fhe coinpetent consider ottd decide fhe oidcr giving reasons for such wifhia Uu-ee monfhs from ffae t^^f compet^nt authority/: '^-w '.^•^ ;\^^ :^ :wi [tfft :h3..1':;-i'r.1 "s: [ssasiss3 liK^I'^J"i^^5!K ::-IIRI «;:l?S?i i?S; f-KS. •''W^SWSSiM •'wiiiS "Ifi-IJSIfi wswslsisss.i'&^r l^:^^?;S^?W!ii^^^^^^T)^; •^ll-^v,:;';;'^i;^^^;^ipi«;;^;;^^ ::^'> ^.(•1.^^;,^.:. 1 »SI ^i^j^^l 'sssss ^^l^^iil ;:B8BR i^: ;?a3S8 iiga IfiiB 'SteiEBS •%'!WS ^ S^SiSli '%1; -ciC' '•WffW »g B»E •-t: WMiSSIKi. :<%:^;.:;^-;'^^.;''- •!'::~'.:-