IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.5265 of 2009 Decided on : 14.09.2009 Subodh Kumar & others ... Petitioners versus Shanti Devi & others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Promila Nain, Advocate for the petitioners. **** 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This revision petition has been filed against the order dated 26.08.2009 whereby the evidence of the petitioners has been closed by the Ld. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Panchkula. Learned counsel for the petitioners states the petitioners are driver/owner and want to place on record the only copy of evidence i.e. License, Insurance Policy, their affidavit and Permit card etc. Learned counsel further states that the case is fixed for rebuttal evidence on 26.09.2009 of the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for one more opportunity to the petitioners for leading entire evidence on the said date on their own responsibility before the respondents lead their rebuttal evidence. In my opinion, it would be in the interest of justice, if CR No.5265 of 2009 -2- the petitioners are allowed to lead their entire evidence on their own responsibility on 26.09.2009. In case, any evidence is not led on that date, no further request in this regard shall be entertained. Petition stands disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. September 14, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE