1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3809/2008 (Yogesh Ishwariprasad Pandey and others vs. Manoharprasad Raghuvirprasad Pande and another) CORAM : B.P.Dhamadhikari, J. DATE : 2 nd DECEMBER, 2008 Heard Advocate Shri Lambat for the petitioners, Advocate Shri Vaidya with Advocate Kulkarni for respondent No.2. Advocate Vaidya points out that the present writ petition is not maintainable. Advocate Lambat seeks permission to file revision challenging the impugned orders and judgment. He prays for continuation of interim order dated 5th September, 2008. The request is being opposed by Advocate Vaidya. He states that reasonable time should be given to the petitioners and till then the respondents shall not execute the decree. In the circumstances, in view of the statement made, time till 15th December, 2008 is given to the petitioner to file revision & interim protection to continue till then. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Rvjalit