C^^-\M-y^$^— 1 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTrSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S)NO. &^Q /2Q1Q Petitioners ^^> ..;•/ y .••" ,y^'^ <v>y^^- ^•'".^' ...^ ••>-' E^'' ^' A° .A' ^\"y" 1. 4 Mahendra Kumar Rathore S/o Late Shri C.LRathore, Aged about 40 years, Shiksha Karmi 6rade-I, B.b.M. Higher Secondary School, Saragaon, Block - Bahmnidih, Distt. Janjgir Champa-(C.6.) "Gokul Prasad Jaiswal S/o Shri Bhim Sen Jaiswal, Aged about 35 years, Shiksha Karmi Srade-III, Govt. Primary School, Bargadi, Block - Bahmnidih, bistt. Janjgir Champa- (C.6.) Smt. Tulsi Jaiswal W/o Shri Gokul Prqsad Jaiswal, Aged about 30 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, Govt. Primary School, Bargadi, Block - Bahmnidih, Distt. Janjgir Champa- (C.6.) Manbodh Patel S/o Shri balsai Patel, Aged about 39 years, Shiksha Karmi firade-III, 6ovt. Primary School, Birra, Block - Bahmnidih, Distt. Janjgir Champa-(C.G.) Kanhaiyalal Dewangan S/o Shri Lachriath bewangan, Aged about 26 years, Shiksha Karmi (Srade-III, 6ovt. Primary School, Birra, Block - Bahmnidih, Distt. Janjgir Champa- (C.6.\a.. 8. 10 ^ Mathura Prasad Madhukar S/o Shri Ram Charan Madhukar, Aged about 26 years, Shiksha Karmi iSr-ade-III, £ovt. Primary School, Taldevri, Block - Bahmnidih, Distt. Janjgir Champa- (c.e.) Ram Gopal Jaiswai S/o Shri Bhim Sen Jaiswal, Aged about 30 years, Shiksha Karmi 6rade-III, (Sovt. Primary School, Rohda, Block - Bahmnidih, listt. Janjgir Champa-(C.(5.) Memram Sahu S/o Shri Bharat Lal Sahu, Aged about 42 years, Shiksha Karmi 6rade-I, 6ovt. Higher Secondary School, Misda, Block— Navagarh,Distt. Janjgir Champa-(C.G.) Krishna Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Prahlad Sahu, Aged about 36 years, Shiksha Karmi Srade-III, 6ovt. Primary School, Pachri, Block - Navagarh. Janjgir Champa-(C.G.) Kumar Kesharwani S/o Shri Shrihari Kesharwani, Aged about 35 years, Shiksha Karmi Srade-II, (Sovt. Middle School, Amarua, Block - Bahmnidih, Distt. Janjgir Champa- (C.G.) Dhaneshwar Prasad Dewangan! S/o Late Shri Tara Chand bewangan, Agedi about39 years, Shiksha Karmi (?rade- I (Maths), B.&.M. Higher Secondary 3 12 Versus Respondents School, Saragaon, Bl6ck - Bahmnidih, Distt. Janjgir Champa-(C.6.) Vinod Kumar Rathore S/o Shri Satyanarayan Rathore, Aged about 37 years, Shiksha Karmi Srade-III, 6ovt. Primary Scliool, Parsapali (Risda), Block - Bahmnidih, Distt. Janjgir Champa-(C.e.) 13^''beepak Kumar Karsh S/o Shri Duje Ram Karsh, Aged about 36 years, Shiksha Karmi Srade-III, 6ovt. Primary School, Amarua, Block - Bahmnidih, Distt. Janjgir Champa- (C.6.) 1. 3. >tate of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary Education, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, bistt. Raipur- (C.6.) The Secretar-y, Panchayat D.K.S. Bhawah, Sachivalaya, Raipur-(C.6.) Distt. Education Officer, Distt. Janjgir Champa-(C.6.) 'Chief Executive Officer, Navagarh, bistt. Janjgir Champa-(C.6.) WRIT PErCTCON UNDER ARTTCLES 226 OF THE CONSTCTUTtON OF INMA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT/WRITS, ORbER/OR&ERS: DIRECTrON/DIRECTrONS, ETC. The petitioners most humbly and respectfully beg to submit as under:- 4. ffll HIGH^60RT<3FeHt^CTlSG«I^ATBllJ^ (Hon.Mr.JusticePritjnkerDiWaker) WritPetiti6h(S) No.6660 df 2010 F>EtlTI(?NERS VERSUS RESPONDENTS Mahendra Kumar Rathore and others State of Chhattisgarh and others ShriAnil Singh RajputyCounselforthepetitioners. Shnt.SmithaGhaiPLferrespOndents/State. WRITPETITIQNyND@Rta RTICil-ES2260FTHE 60NSTmT"i®NOF INtllA ORDER (20.11.2010) Grievarice of the petitioners in this petition is that initially they wrere appointeii as Contract Teache^Grade and thpreafter as Shiksha Karmi buttK^y are not^bejng ^ MaSter on tl"i6 ground that they d6 not have the experience of seven years as ShiKsha Karmi. 2. Counsel for the respondents/State silibmits that now the go\rem^r Has taken a decision to permit al| those Shiksha Karrnis whO have tli§experienre pfseveh years either on the po^^^^ TNcsher orcin the post of Shiksha Ksirmi and therefore, there remajns nothing in the present petitkin.^ 19.11.2010 isSuedbytheDireetor,Piibliclnstmcti6ns,Raipyraddressed fo ttteAdvocateC3eneral.<^pyG^th)&sai^l RajpytalSoandheissatJsfiedwiththesame.GounselfcrtBe siibmits thafthe examination f6r th^ post 6f tiead masteris scheduled fbr 28/11.2010 andasthepetitionersapprSHendthatltieyma^ permittg'd to efppear in the same,' a direietion maY be issued t6 the responderits^topermitthemtoappeartinfl-ie.saidexamiination. 3; StateGourisel subrnitsthat the^apprehenisiorioftRepetitionersis prem^ture and if they have duly 'filietf;jn? tHe application 'fQrms, the authority Goneerned would acf pyrsuant^to tlie deeision takeri by the^ State Governmenivide letter dated 19.-11i2010. •Z-— 4. Ih fhe facts apd GircumstanGesof^ ^sey asln&hin^ the petition, it js disposed of with a directioato r^poridant^NQ^^^^ permif the petitionere to appear in the -examinatiQn^& 'bet^eld^^o 28.11.2010 fortMepostofHeadMasterpursuanttoW&^egiSiQ^ by the State Goyemment subject to the veFification of the facftha^the petitioners have filled in their forms and^the same have^ aGceptedbythei^uthoritycOncemed. ^^^^^^^^^^^^ % 5. Ifthe grievance ofthe petitiohers still survives, they wQuld bie^at libSttyto approach this Court. _______—— Sd/- pritinkerDiwakar Judge •^y^w,;'^S^^^^.'^..^