IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2008 / 24TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 27673 of 2007(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ USHA BHAI, W/O. LATE JAYAPRAKASH, AGED 48 YEARS, POTTRYIL VADAKKEKALAM, EZHAKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, PALAKKAD. 2. THE KANHIKULAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., P.O.KANHIKULAM - 678 596, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, KANHIKULAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. THE SPECIAL SALE OFFICER, THE KANHIKULAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., P.O.KANHIKULAM-678 596, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. R1, R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.K.RAVIKRISHNAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN WPC.27673/07 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO.CE(1)20805/2007 DATED 3.5.2007 OF THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR DATED 28.11.2006 OF THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 14.8.2007 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. /TRUE COPY/ THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.27673 OF 2007 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT Learned Government Pleader appears for respondents 1 and 3. Having regard to the nature of the order being issued hereunder, notice to the second respondent is dispensed with, preserving its right to move for review of this judgment, if aggrieved. The complaint of the petitioner is that she is entitled to the benefits of Exts.P1 and P2 circulars and is thus not liable to make any payments in terms of Ext.P3. No interim order has been issued in this case filed in 2007. All that is required is for the first respondent to consider any grievance of the petitioner, including regarding the applicability of Exts.P1 and P2. It is directed that any request of the petitioner for consideration of such claim shall be entertained by the first respondent with notice to the second respondent and appropriate decision rendered in accordance with law. The writ petition ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge kkb.17/7.