Petjtloner Respondents WrK Petmon No. 1887 of 2008 Aditya Narayan Jaiswal, aged about 49 years, Son of Shri Prabliu Narayan Jaiswai, resident of Boun'psra, Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG). 1) State of Chhaitisaarh, through Secretarv, Department of Exclse, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). 25 The Excise Commissioner. Government of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). 3) The Distriot Excise Officer, Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG). CA/rit Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution of !ndia) otri, J. Shri V.K. Pandey, counsel for the petittoner. SmS. Binu Sharma, Panel Lau/yer for the State. 'ra fPassed on P/,2i J?9 Learned counsel appearing for the peiitjoner suomits, on instructions, that the issue Involved in the present petition has aiready been settled by the judgment and order dated 21-12-1990 passed bv the Supreme Court in the matter of State of M.P. and others Vs. M.K. Vyas and others in Civil Appeais No. 6245 to 8247 of 1990. The petitioner has aireaciy made a representation on 20-2-2008 (Annexue P/6) So the respondents/auShorities to consider his case in the light of the judicia! pronouncement as made by the Supreme Court in the above stated case. Learned counsel further submits that this matter mav be disDosed of with a direction to the State authorities to consider and decide his representation, In accordance with taw in the iight of the above stated case as expeditiously as possibie, to which learned counset appearing for ths respondents/State has no objectton. 2) !t is ordered as prayea' for. Raiu 3) Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents aut'norities to consider and decide the reDresemation dated 20-2-2006 (Annexure P/S) fiied by the petitioner, 'in accordance with iaw and in the iight oft'ne above stated case, as expeditiousiy as possibie, preferabty vfflhin a period of eight v/ee'o from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. Sd/- 1 Satish KL.Agnihotri \ Judge B""