1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2013 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr. Jyoti Chavan, for the petitioner. Mr R.M.Hardas i/b Mr P.N.Joshi, for respondent nos 1 to 3. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 08/09/2009 PC: Heard learned counsel for the parties. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if an observation is made that the order of status-quo passed in the suit is not binding on the petitioner and that she has instructions to withdraw this petition. This petition is arising from the order passed by the City Civil Court rejecting the petitioner’s application for his impleadment as a party defendant in the suit. His application was opposed by the T 2 plaintiffs contending that he is neither necessary nor proper party in the suit. In other words, he submitted that the issues involved in the suit can be adjudicated without his presence. Counsel for the respondent also does not dispute that the order of status-quo passed in the suit is not binding on the petitioner. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. It is needles to express that the order of status-quo passed in the suit to which the petitioner was not a party, is not binding on the petitioner. Withdrawal of this petition shall not preclude the petitioner from filing independent suit for appropriate reliefs. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) 3