O R D E R:- The petitioner claims that he is the owner of the mulgi in question having purchased the same under registered sale deed dated 20.05.1996, and since then is in possession and enjoyment of the same. While so, the petitioner states that respondent No.2- Corporation without issuing any show cause notice under Section 452 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955, has directly issued the impugned notice under Section 636 of the Act, stating that the mulgi has been construction in violation of the sanctioned plan and the provisions of Sections 441, 442 and 443 of the Act, and that the said mulgi be removed within a period of three days from the date of receipt of notice, failing which respondent No.2 will be constrained to demolish the mulgi in order to restore the parking area. Hence, the petitioner filed the present writ petition seeking appropriate directions. The learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2-GHMC admitted that no show cause notice under Section 452 of the Act has been issued to the petitioner, and submitted that the impugned notice issued under Section 636 of the Act be treated as show cause notice one under Section 452 of the Act, and the petitioner be directed to submit his explanation thereto. The learned counsel for the petitioner expressed no objection to this course of action. In view of the above stand taken by both the counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions: The impugned notice dated 12.08.2009, issued by respondent No.2 under Section 636 of the Act, shall be treated as show cause notice to the petitioner under Section 452 of the Act. The petitioner, shall submit his explanation to the show cause notice within ten days from today. After considering the explanation, if any, to be submitted by the petitioner, respondent No.2 shall pass appropriate orders. Till such exercise is undertaken, status quo obtaining as on today shall be maintained by the parties. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs, ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 17th August, 2009 Note: Issue wire party’s cost. (B/o) bcj