IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1892 of 2009 1. Aajeet Kumar, S/o. Lakshmi Kant Yadav, 2. Sudish Kumar, S/o. Ganga Prasad, 3. Arun Yadav, S/o. Bhuvneshwar Yadav, All residents of village- Kua, P.S. Bithan, District- Samastipur. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 08.05.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to correct the name of the father of petitioner No.2 Satish Kumar and also seeks permission to make some correction in para-3 of the petition. He is permitted to do so. The corrections were made in course of the day. Heard. Petitioner No.1 Ajeet Kumar is the full brother and petitioner Nos.2 & 3 are the Phuphera brother of the informant Archana Kumari and they apprehend their arrest in Khodavandpur P.S. Case No. 104 of 2006 under Sections 307, 364 and 120B of the I.P.C. The informant alleged that she had performed love marriage with one Amit Raj of his village and since then she was living with him, therefore, family members were annoyed. Further allegation is that the petitioner took the informant and her daughter on the pretext of taking her to her Maika and saying that they will accept 2 the marriage but after ten days three persons namely, Chandrachur Yadav, Bhama Rajak and Lalo Mahto, who are also accused in the F.I.R. had snatched her daughter and they had tried to throttle her by tying rope around her neck, as a result of which she had become unconscious and on gaining conscious she found herself near Gandak river and when she disclosed the occurrence police arrived and recorded the F.I.R. It was alleged that being aggrieved due to her inter-caste love marriage, the occurrence was occurred. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the informant’s father Lakshmi Kant Yadav was also made accused in the case and vide order dated 18.12.2008 under Cr. Misc. No.43019 of 2008 he was allowed anticipatory bail by this Court. It is submitted that there was no allegation of assault on these petitioners. Mrs. Indiwar Kumari, learned Addl. P.P. does not point out any other material against the petitioners. In the facts and circumstances, petitioners named above are admitted anticipatory bail. They are 3 directed to surrender in the Court-below within two weeks from today and on their surrender they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Khodavandpur P.S. case No.104 of 2006 subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Mkr. (C.M. Prasad, J.)