^ST^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL, J. Applicant Respondents M.C.C.No. 343 of 2011 Shri Padumlal, s/o Gadaram Suryavanshi, aged about 48 years, R/o Pamgarh dist. Janjgir C.G. VERSUS 1. Shri Dinuram Sahu, s/o Kaliram Sahu, aged about 26 years, r/o Mahamipara, near Salari Mandir, P.S. Mahasamund, distt. Raipur C.G. 2. Kantilal Patel, s/o A.B. Patel, r/o Mahasamund near Bus Stand, distt. Raipur C.G. 3. The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Branch No.1, Jeewan Bima Marg Raipur, distt. RaipurC.G. 4. Mohanlal Jalkshatriya, s/o Pusauram, aged 27 years, r/o Puranabhata, Mahasamund, distt. Raipur C.G. 5. Pannalal Gupta, s/o Ramvishal Gupta, r/o 12 Hospital Ward Mahasamund, distt. Raipur. 6. The Divisional Manager, the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Kachahari Chowk, Distt. Raipur C.G. ADDlication for restoratipn ofMisc. Appeal No. 309 of 2005 Present: Smt. Bhagwati Kashyap, counsel for the petitioner. // ^ •^/ M.C.C. No. 343 of 2011 :;^"" ORDER ^th (19mSeptember,2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Smt. Bhagwati Kashyap, learned counsel for the petitioner is heard on the restoration petition. 2) The petitioner is seeking restoration of M.A. No.309 of 2005, which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 05.04.2011. 3) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, we are satisfied that the absence of the petitioner's/appellant's counsel on 05.04.2011, when M.A. No.309 of 2005 was taken-up for hearing, was based on bona fide grounds. 4) . M.C.C. No. 343 of 2011, therefore, is allowed and M.A. No.309 of 2005 is restored to its original number. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge nimmi