IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13637 of 2010 TRIPURARI PRASAD SINGH, son of Late Satyadeo Prasad Singh, resident of Village Bathua Bujurg, P.S. Mushrigharari, under Sarai Ranjan Block, in the District of Samastipur. ---Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Government of Bihar. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar. 3. The District Education Officer, Samastipur. 4. The Headmaster, High School, Bathua Bujurg, in the District of Samastipur. 5. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. 6. The District Provident Fund Officer, Samastipur. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 1.9.2010 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add the District Provident Fund Officer, Samastipur as respondent no.6. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Keep it on record. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State as also the Accountant General. After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner had earlier filed a representation before the Department on 16th of October, 2009, as contained in Annexure 8, however, for redressal of the grievances as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the District Education Officer, Samastipur (respondent no.3), with a copy each to respondent no.4 - 2 - and 5. In case such a representation is filed stating the details of his grievances as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation be considered and disposed of by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months on receipt of such representation. Upon consideration, in case the representation of the petitioner is accepted, the amount of Rs.1,77,000/- and odd, if already recovered, be refunded back to the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of one month thereafter. It goes without saying that pending final fixation of pension, the admissible provisional pension be continued. With regard to the grievance for payment of the G.P.F. amount, the petitioner also proposes to file a separate representation before the newly added respondent no.6-the District Provident Fund Officer, Samastipur, which may be considered and disposed of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)