IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN THURSDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2006 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1928 WP(C).No. 30080 of 2006(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ N.S. VARGHESE, NJARTHANKAL HOUSE, VADAVUKODE P.O.,PIN-682 310. BY ADV. SRI.M.C.JOHN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, SQUAD NO.IV, COMMERCIAL TAX, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY), KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, PERUMBAVOOR. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI JULIAN XAVIER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON I.A.NO.16830/2006 IN WP(C).NO.30080/2006 -------------- DISMISSED 154/12/2006 Sd/- P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE. APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PENALTY ORDER NO.CR-85/2001-02 'DTD. 28/2/2005 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ACCOMPANIED TO EXT.P1. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DTD. 27/2/2006 FILED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DTD. 27/2/2006 FILED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE R.R. NOTICE NO.B7-25432/2006 DTD.28/8/2006 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.STRP 92/2006 DTD. 22/11/2006 OF THE IST RESPONDENT. P.R.RAMAN, J. -------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.30080 OF 2006 --------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of December, 2006 JUDGMENT The only relief sought for in this writ petition is for a direction to the lst respondent to take up Ext.P3 revision and Ext.P4 stay application at an early date and to pass orders thereon. This Court has already passed an interim order directing to consider and dispose of Ext.P4 stay application. As such if and when the petitioner feels aggrieved by any order passed on the stay application, he can seek appropriate remedies against the same. Though the petitioner is sought for a direction to dispose of Ext.P3 revision, I find that Ext.P3 revision was filed only on February, 2006. In such circumstances, it cannot be said that there is any refusal to dispose of the revision -:2:- W.P.(C).NO.30080/2006 petition within a specific time limit. However, there will be a direction to dispose of Ext.P3 revision petition expeditiously. Writ Petition is closed. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE. kcv.