IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37705 of 2010 CHANDAN KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3 3.3.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Complainant initially was married with petitioner’s brother Pandu Yadav in the year 1997. It is alleged that in the year 2002 when Pandu Yadav became traceless, petitioner married her and after coming in service in the year 2007 complainant is being tortured and ultimately dowry is also demanded. Submission is that complainant is wife of Pandu yadav who is alive and has filed a matrimonial case for restitution of conjugal right in the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhagalpur. So the cause behind the torture is not justifying sustainability of accusation against petitioner for refusal of anticipatory bail. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount 2 each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in Complaint Case No. 242/09, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)