WPMS No. 3815 of 2001 (Old No 27727/98) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Sri Gopal Narain, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pankaj Miglani, learned Counsel for the respondent no. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the Labour Court did not provide the opportunity to the employer to adduce the evidence on record after declaring the domestic enquiry held against the workman as unfair, although the petitioner had prayed to this effect in its written statement filed before the Labour Court. As such, finding of the Labour Court is perverse. Therefore, writ petition is allowed. the matter is remanded back to the Labour Court with direction to decide the dispute afresh after affording proper opportunity to the respective parties. (P.C.V., J. 15.7.2008 Prabodh