Single Beftttfr IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Cr.M.P. N0. 1 ^ /2010 (S.B.) PETITIONER/ ACCUSED PERSON s-^^S^ '^A6^*--'"" ¥'n-tjl"^^.cy •:-^\rA\p..-- »<^ Kritikant Sharma, S/o Dilip Kumar Sharma, aged about 55 years, R/o House No. 116, Shikshak Nagar, Durg, Tahsil Wv-'-" RESPONDENT \T; -i ^"1- ^^^\ SE Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS COMPLAINANT R.N. Singh, S/o B.N. Singh, aged about 36 years, R/o Near Laxmi Narayan Temple, Diirg, Tahsil 8s Distt. Durg (C.G.) APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C^^OR SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY LEARNED •SESSION JUDGE, 12TIi ADDITIONAL SESSION JUDGE, T.T.C.DURG. DIST DURG fC.G.L IN WHICH THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL SESSION JUDGE HAD BEEN PLEASED TO DISMISS THE CRIMINAL REVISION N0 r/2< 72009 ON 08.02.2010, WHICH AROSE OUT OF AN ORDER PASSED BY AN ORDER PASSED IN CRIMINAL CASE 1073/2009, WHERE THE ACCUSED HAD FILED AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 311''OF CR.P.C. FOR PERMISSION TO EXAMINE ,.THE COMPLAINANT ON THE BASIS OF THIS REASON THAT SOME OF THE MATERIAL FACTS HAD EMERGED DURING THE COURSE OF THE EXAMINATION OF THE ACCUSED AND THE ACCUSED FURTHER BY A RECROSS WANTED TO UNFOLD SOME IMPORTANT ^ FACTS BY WHICH THE ALLEGATION AGAINST THE ACCUSED_^tA^^E CQNTROVERTED AND THE LEARNED JUDIC^L MAGISTRATE IST CLASS, DURG BY ORDER DATED 25.0"^.2009. HAD DISMISS THE APPLICATION AND POSTED THE CASE FOR FINAL ARGUMENTS. CERTIFIED '^ COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED ON 08.02.2010 PASSED BY ~7' 12 ADDITIONAL SESSION JUDGE, F.T.C. DURG IS FILED HEREWITH WHICH IS MARKED AS ANNEXURE A/lAnd Bv This Petition The_.Honl3le Court Is Desirous To Get A Direction ForJ'he_TLrial Coyrt To Grant The Application Filed Bv The Accused And The Complainant Be Recalled For Further Recross Examination. &. :2 ^ an^t^T .ofipiwsnjsi *l) tlRtl ^ ^^f ]^3/;0 an^T XBR; (^f^?) sn^c^<nw<to ^c.^.Cp' ^.P 9-^, ^ ^f^- tT^^k^lu ^^teoy/A t'^-r^ \y^S^ °^r> Sd/- Judge ^,rafei*T-wi^i ^ fe^t'tf5R5IT iR SlfiOT ffl^I VKSfR 0*1 WTO". <W^i<']M —FS/53-8/2007 -30,000. €