@ 6/6;\e’®1‘ EEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGILRjI A1: BILASPUR A, WRIT PETITION (5) No? qbt?? nag $WGLE BENgH {iGhanaram Yadav S/o Late Arjun 'v‘adav Aged about 56 years, R/o Village Asalkhor, Bhanupratqppur, Block District North Batstar Kanker, C.G. PgTITIoN-ER VERSUS {7v BELSPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattiri;gar', Through Secretary, Department of Scheduied Tribe and Scheduled Caste Deveiopment, Mantraiaya, D'JéiS. Bhawan, Raipur, C.G. District Education officer Kanker District North Bastar (Kanker) , C.G. 3.’ Assistant CommissiOnear, Tribai Developn'lent:, Kanker District North Bastar (Kanker) , C.G. 4. District Treasury Office r, Treasu ry Kanker District North BastariKmker) , C.G. wizIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTIIUI‘Igw INDIA \ h O» HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Sinqle Bench: Hdnble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, ’ J. WRIT PETITION (S) NO.4477I2010 Ghanaram Yadav Versus RESPONDENTS a State of Chhattisgarh nd Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE a6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Present: - Shri Satyendra Sahu, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer for the Stateirespondents on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 12‘“ of August, 201 0) The petitioner waS initiaily appointed as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs.100/-. After completion of his probation period, he was granted regular pay scale. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. 3. The issue involved herein was considered by therMadhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A.No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 Others v. State of MP. 8. others). wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to reguiar pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of i i the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment. i ’Il PETITIONER q\ ,7 4. In View of the above stated submissions made by learned counsei for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation, if so advised. to consider his case, if he stand on the same footings as per order dated 24-08-1992 passed by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabatpur in O.A.No.2745 of 89 Madhukant Yadu (supra) and subsequentiy confirmed by order dated 03-01 -1 994 passed by the Hon'bie Supreme Court in S.L,P.No.6892r’1993 and grant relief accordingty. x . Sd/- Manmdra Mohan Shri f Judge 5. No order as to costs. ax“ vastava Tumane