IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2009 / 6TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 9951 of 2009(L) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.H.KADER,CHEDAYARIARATH HOUSE, P.O.CHAMBAD,PANOOR, TELLICHERRY. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR. 2. THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER,ELECTION (GENERAL DEPARTMENT),LEGISLATURE COMPLEX,VIKAS BHAVAN.PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695033. ADV. SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, SC,ELE.COMMN. FOR R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No. 9951 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 27th day of March, 2009. JUDGMENT Delay in settling the timing and issuing permit consequent to Ext.P1, on account of Ext.P2 order issued by the Chief Electoral Officer is what is complained of in this writ petition. A reading of Ext.P1 itself shows that it was consequent on the order of the STAT that permit was granted. Referring to Ext.P2 this court in the judgment in WP (c).No.8383/09 has held that Ext.P2 order cannot apply to grant of permit or issue there of consequent on court orders. Therefore Ext.P2 cannot stand in the way of the respondent settling timings consequent on Ext.P1. With this clarification and directing that it will be open to the respondent to settle the timings and issue permit in terms of Ext.P1 this writ Petition is disposed of. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/