C^3 BILASPUR IC.G.} W.P. (S) ^M// ^/^/ "••"I \?' ^y"/-^w .*6'-''by 2. ^ ;l. Shiv Charan Yadav, aged about 52 years, S/o Shri MadanSingh, R/o Govindpur, Tahsil Kanker Distt. North Baster Kanker (C.G.) 2. Sanya! Singh Nareti, aged about 53 years, S/o Late Shri Noher Singh Nareti, P./o Village Makri, Tahsil Charama Distt. North Baster Kanker (C.G.) 3. Premnth Teta, aged about 52 years, S/o Rihodas Ram Teta, R/o Andi, Tahsil Kanker, Distt. North Baster Kanker (C.6.) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) The Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department Raipur (C.6.) Joint Director, Treasury, accounts, pension, North Baster Kanker (C.G.) J- 4. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Kanker, Distt. North Baster Kanker (C.(S.) WRIT PETTTEON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE E"'"..•^" y^ ^ ^^ssff'^'^^ i{ "'•te.^A^-'A^ XI-HG—78 ^sr "Lii'L)id'4, »t<iy'i<»,T'^irey '^i^o. S^^l 311^1 tpRT (^t^^) 3iI^?I^I^;fe w snw 9i>«fi -J(- ^giwnf?;' B^I SB : Hon'bie Shri manindra Mohan Sbnvastava, u 30-08-2011 Shri D. N. Prajapati, counsei for ti)i Shri A.V.S'hridhar, Panel Lawyer) With the consent of iearned finaiiy. The petitioners were appoint^d suooessfully completing the probation pay scaie. Learned counsel appearing fo| involved in the case is as to whether, scale with effeoi from the date of iiliiti probation period. tne issue invoived nerein was Administrative Iribunal, Jabalpur in others v. S-rsre ofm.P. & ofhers;, teachers are entitied to regular pay appointment. The matterwas taken Leave Petition (Civii) No.6892/93. The] Supreme Court, upholding the decisi^n Teachers/Assistant Teaohers are initial appointment. Accordingiy, fhe petitioners are| raising aii their grievances, in the ligi|t dated 27/12/2008 and in tum, the con| his case on its own merits and in its p^r same rooting as per order passed uf entitiea igV *l<li<-l''fl-f 'qFRff'? fezt tlal^K •^; siRpT sn^r petrtionere. |for the State. coUnsei for the parties, the matter is heard int^d on a fixed pay of Rs.150/-. After ^enod df 2 years, they were granted reguiar the petiiioners: submits ihat the issue |the petitioners are entitied to reguiar pay ii|iiiiai appointment or aner compietion ot |;onsidered by the Madhya Pradesh State OjA.No.2745/83 [Maahukant Yadu and 56 wr|erein, it was held that the simiiariy situated &cale with errect rrom tne date or initiai to the Hon'bie Supreme Court in special jsaid petition was dismtesed bythe Hon'ble of the Tribunal to the effect that the itit|ed to regutar pay scale from the date of granted liberty to make a representation t of the aforesaid judgment and circular ;erned respondent is directed to consider 'rspective. If the petitioners stand on the fcy the State Administratlve Tribunai in \ \- 1 -'"'"'.$}.. "^- ^ /'""°' .'-"^. L:;^l?S^L-^'J^r. ^.;^^\ ''ss'sy"'s R>, --.»-•.' XI-HC—78 -3 r "4|t|lc]-4, ®Tti<H'|(o,[stdl'My U5 ipf-i") v^3 • 3a q^- sn^I iraqT (ijciq^f) SD^ff ^I (<.ii«h WTan^iww Oyypsj ^aiw^ritaan^i Madhukant Yadu (Supra) and Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.6892ji may be entitled to same reiief accordingf It is expected from the State scrutiny or the tacts. It is made olear that this Coun h^s of the case and the authority conce[ representation strtctly in accordanoe wit| With the aforesaid obsen/ations, subsequjentiy confirmed by the Supreme Court in j93 by order dated 3/1/95, the petitionere (y. aLJthorities to oass suitable order after due tftl^i<vl4)p'f "RTR^ ^f TSTst <r^4^i< ^i'siRprsn^M not expressed any opinion on tne merits 1'ned would be at liberty to decide the ti law. the petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge