WP(C) 1843/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I A ANSARI Heard Mr. A. M. Buzarbaruah, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, and Mr. B. J. Ghosh, learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the respondent No s. 1, 2, 4 and 5. Heard also Mr. D. Saikia, learned counsel for respondent No. 3. None has appeared on behalf of the remaining respondents. The petitioner, who claims to have been working as Chowkidar, Raja Pukhu ri Gaon Panchayat, under Darrang Zilla Parishad, has filed this writ petition, u nder Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking appropriate direction to the respondents. According to the petitioner, the revised pay, in respect of th e casual workers and ad hoc employees, who have had been working, in the same ca pacity as the petitioner, stands enhanced to a fixed pay of Rs. 4,500/- per mont h. The petitioner has also pointed out that the Joint Director, Finance (Economi c Affairs) Department, Government of Assam, has issued a letter, on 14.02.2011, to the Deputy Secretary to the Government of Assam, Panchayat and Rural Developm ent Department, with a request to send the detailed list of casual workers, enga ged during the period from 01.01.1988 to 01.04.1993 and also from 02.04.1993 to 31.03.2006, to the concerned Zilla Parishad for collection of the bank account numbers, etc., of those employees/workers, for onward transmission to the Govern ment for providing casual employees/workers with the enhanced fixed pay of Rs. 4 ,500/- and that, in terms of the direction, dated 14.02.2011, aforementioned, th e Joint Director, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Government of Assa m, sent a list/detail particulars of 43 casual employees/workers, who had been e ngaged between 01.01.1988 and 01.04.1993 and also between 02.04.1993 and 31.03.2 006 and working at different Gaon Panchayats, under the Darrang Zilla Parishad, to the Chief Executive Officer, Darrang Zilla Parishad, for onward submission o f the same to the Government, but in the said list of 43 numbers of candidates, so forwarded, the name of the petitioner does not appear; rather, the names of m ost of the candidates, who were engaged later than the present petitioner, have been enlisted and sent to the Government. Considering the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justice, i t is hereby directed that the respondents, particularly, respondent No. 4, namel y, Commissioner, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Government of Assam , shall examine, or cause to be examined, the grievances of the petitioner and i f the petitioner is found to have been working, as claimed by him, his name shal l be included in accordance with the requirements, as have been set out by the l etter, dated 14.02.2011, aforementioned. The whole exercise, so directed, shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy o f this order by the respondent No. 3. Whatever decision(s) is/are reached by th e respondents, the same shall be communicated, in writing, to the petitioner and if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision(s), which may be taken by the respondents/authorities concerned, the petitioner shall remain at liberty to ta ke recourse to such provision of law as may be permissible. The petitioner may furnish to the respondent No. 4, namely, Commissioner , Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Government of Assam, a certified c opy of this order alongwith a copy of this writ petition and annexure(s) thereto . This writ petition stands disposed of with the above observations and di rections.