1 cam-38-10 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 38 OF 2010 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 20 OF 2010 Mrs. Veena Vishnu Dhargalkar .. Applicant Vs. Mr. Vishnu Raiba Dhargalkar .. Respondent Mr. Jitendra Ramgude and Ms. Aparna Sawant for applicant. Mr. R.T. Lalwani for respondent. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U. D. SALVI, JJ. NOVEMBER 26, 2010. P.C. Heard. The applicant has challenged the decree of divorce granted by the Family Court in FCA No. 20 of 2009 and the same has been admitted by us on 16/2/2010. This application prays for stay to the decree of divorce granted 2 cam-38-10 by the Family Court. However, the respondent has filed affidavit-in-reply in this application and stated that he has re-married on 25/11/2009 at Thane as per the Hindu vedic rites, after the period of limitation (the decree of divorce was granted on 24/7/2009). Hence, this application, as of now, does not survive and the same is disposed off accordingly. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the respondent has not acted as per the statement recorded in the order dated 16/2/2010 regarding the payment of arrears of maintenance and if that be so, an additional affidavit be placed on record so that Mr. Lalwani can take instructions. Time to file the paper book in the appeal is extended by four weeks. (U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)