THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.295 OF 2002 ORDER: 1 Respondents 1 to 5 were tried by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Medak in S.C.No.400 of 1992 for the offences punishable under sections 304-A of IPC and under sections 3 and 5 r/w Section 7 of the Explosive Substances Act. The learned Assistant Sessions Judge having considered the entire evidence, by his judgment dated 08.11.2001 found the respondents guilty and passed the following order: A2 to A5 are found guilty for the charge U/s. 304-A IPC and are sentenced to suffer R.I. for a period of one year and also pay fine of Rs.2,000/- each. A.2 and A3 are further found guilty and are sentenced to suffer R.I. for a period of one year each and also pay fine of Rs.3,000/- each. A.4 and A.5 are found not guilty U/s.3 and 5 of E.S. Act and are acquitted U/s 235(1) Cr.P.C.” 2 Against the said judgment dated 08.11.2001 the wife of the deceased Smt. P.Vijaya Laxmi approached this court and filed Crl.R.C.No.1562 of 2003 and the same was dismissed by a learned Judge of this court on 04.07.2007. It appears against the very same judgment the said Vijaya Laxmi preferred the present revision. In my considered view two revisions are not maintainable against the very same judgment passed in the SC No.400 of 1996. In view of the fact that Crl.R.C.No.1562 of 2003 against the judgment in S.C.No.400 of 1996 was already dismissed by this court, this revision in my considered view is not maintainable and accordingly the same is dismissed. -------------- 08.07.2010 Kvsn