/Q) c ^^c> 'zry^ /-- s B©! IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION (C INO. 2 65-7 OF 2009 PETITIONER ...^. ,.^--^-'' ^J^-" ...^•""js"^ ^%'- \°>^ ^ RESPONDENTS Pyare Lal Yadav S/o Shri Mangal Ram Yadav, aged about 32 years, occupation Officiating Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Kumharikala, Janpad Panchayat Bamhnidih, District Janjgir Champa C.G. VERSUS 1. ^ State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Panchayat Department, DKS Bhawan Raipur C.G. 2. High Power Caste Scrutiny Commitee through the Commissioner, Ravishankar Shula University Campus Raipur C.G. 3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue ) Champa, District Janjgir Champa C.G. 4. The Deputy Director Panchayat and Social Welfare, Janjgir Champa C.G. 5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Bamhnidih, District Janjgir Champa C.G. 6. Gram Panchayat Kumharikala through the Secretary, Gram Panchayat Kumharikala, District Janjgir Champa C.G. \ 7. Chameli Bai W/o Shyam Kumar, aged about 24 years, ward member Gram Panchayat Kumharikala, Janpad Panchayat Bamhnidih, District Janjgir Champa C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ H1GH COURT OF CHHAITISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 2657 of2009 PETITIONER : Pyare Lal Yadav. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Asiuhotri, J. Present: Shri Rakesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyerforthe State/respondentNo. 1 to 4. Shri A.N.Bhakta, Advocate for the respondent No. 7. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 23rd day of June, 2010) 3. Leamed counsel appearing fbr the petitioner, on instmctions, submits that wifh the passage oftime, this petition has become iiitructuous. Leamed counsel appearing for other side do not controvert the above submission. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as having becom^ infriictuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Aniit