IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 5TH MARCH 2007 / 14TH PHALGUNA 1928 RP.No. 91 of 2007() ------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WA.1661/2004 Dated 30/10/2006 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS ----------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, LAND BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA. 3. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R), CHERTHALA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BENNY GERVASIS RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT/PETITIONER -------------------------------------------------- MAVELIKKARA VALLIYAKOTARAM GURUVAYOORAPPAN CHARITABLE TRUST, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE PRESIDENT NALINI RAVIVARMA GOKULAM, KILIMANOOR. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.K.JAGADEESH SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & ANTONY DOMINIC, JJ. ````````````````````````````````````` R.P. NO. 91 OF 2007 IN W.A.No.1661 of 2004 ``````````````````````````` Dated this the 5th day of March, 2007 O R D E R P.R.Raman, J. Heard both sides. 2. As per the writ appeal judgment, the petitioner was directed to approach the authorities concerned regarding his claim for compensation arising under the Kerala Land Reforms Act. However, as regards another claim towards compensation under the Kerala Jenmi Karam Payment Abolition Act, 1950, an amount of Rs.1,40,000/-, as evidenced by Annexure A1 produced by the appellants themselves (State), was directed to be paid. In such circumstances, we do not find any good ground to review the judgment. Review Petition is dismissed. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp