IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14652 of 2010 1. RAJEEV KUMAR S/O SATYA NARAYAN PRASAD YADAV R/O VILL.- JHALIGHAT, P.S.- JANKI NAGAR, DISTT.- PURNEA---PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PURNEA 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION PURNEA 5. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENTION OFFICER, BANMANKHI, PURNEA 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BANMANKHI BLOCK, PURNEA 7. THE MUKHIA, GRAM PANCHAYAT MADHUBANI, UNDER BANMANKHI BLOCK, PURNEA 8. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT, MADHUBAN, BLOCK BANMANKHI, PURNEA 9. MANISHI MUNNA S/O SRI SURESH PRASAD R/O VILL.- JHALIGHAT, P.S.- JANKINAGAR, DISTT.- PURNEA---RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 21.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. There is no occasion to grant any relief to the petitioner now at this stage for his appointment on the post of a Panchayat Shiksha Mitra, after coming of 2006 Rules because after 1.7.2006 there are no post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra in existence and there is no occasion to give any direction for appointment to the post whatever the findings or the circumstances under which he could not be appointed. Even otherwise the claim of the petitioner is based on the so called enquiry report which is dated 12.9.2006. Why the petitioner choose to sleep over the matter if at all any right accrued in his favour has not been explained. In the charged circumstance the petitioner cannot be given any relief now more so after 1.7.2006. This writ application has no merit and it is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)