IN TIE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE: AT BIWPUR(CPMATTEGARH) CV3 M“ OF 2003 wan pETITIoN No. Z I! :90 PETITIONE‘RS 1. Vinod Syingh Sikarwar,5on of H.S..S ikarwar. aged about 37 years. presently working as Head ConS table, ElecomWeehhPosted at Police Telecom Head Quarter,Bh11ai Dis trict-Durg. (C. G.) Ram Kumar Mishra,son of Shri Bhagwan Das Mishra,aged about 42 year$, presently working a5 Head Cons table ,Tele oo’m, (Tech) , posted at Police Telecom Head Quarter ,Bhilai .Dis trict—Durg, (C.G. ) Srukh mayal Qeharia. Son of Shri Kodulal neharia, aged about 39 years, presently working as Head Constable, Telecom. (Tech) posted at police (Telecom) Range Head Quarter,Ra1pur, (C.G. ) VERSJ US; l. Union of Irdia. through the Secretarypepartment o£ Personnel/Public Grievances and Pension. Illrd floor.lok Nayak Bhawan. Khan Market, New Delhi, 5mmmeme 2. State of Madhya Pradeeh,through Secretary, Department of Home affairs ,Vallabh Bhawan.Bhope1, (14.? .) s ta te of Chhattisgarh , through Secretary, Department of Home Affairs ,D .K .57 .B ui lding, Mantra laya, Raipur , Dis trl ot- Raipur. (CeGo )c ERIT PETITION UmE‘-R MTICLFL: 226/227 OF__'I‘HE‘ CObBTITUTION OE IbDIAa l . FARTICUmae OF THE: pETITIoNEzRa As per cause titleo - 20 PAR'LICULARS or Tm ReopomEm : A5 per cause title. . " k HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Singe Bench: Hon’blc Mr. Justice Batish K. mihotri. Writ Peh‘iion No. 3109 of 2003 Peu'tioner's Vinod Singh Sikalwar 8r. others Versus Respondents Union of India 85 others \ Shxi B. D. Guru, Advocate for the peh'tioners. Shri S. K. Bexiwal, Standing counsel for Respondent No. 1. Shri Sandeep Dubey, Govt. Advocate for Respondents No. 3. Shri V. C. Ottalwar, Advocate for mspondent No.’ 2. ORAL ORDER ( 21“ February, 2006) The following order of the Court was passed by Satish K. mihotri, 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitj that the petitioners, who axe worldng in the Home Department, are permanent xesidents of the State of Madhya Pradesh. The petitioners have been allocated to the State of Chhatn‘sgarh and they want their ‘ mallocah'on to the State of Madhya Pradesh. He further submits that the lepresentah'ons dated 12.4.2002 and 6.5.2003 (collectively filed as Annexme P/ 2) ale pending before the Additional Secretary, Home Department Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Raipur,have not been considered by the authorities concerned. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instruction, submits that the petitioneis be granted liberty to make a representation to the respondents for redressal of their grievances. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection to the said submission. 2. In view of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of finally, with liberty to the petitioners to make appropriate representation to the respondents/authorities concerned, within a period of two weeks from today, and the respondents] authorities are directed to consider and decide the same, in an objective manner, in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, if any. Certihed copy, as per Rules. Sd/— SalishJC Agnihouj Judge Thakur ‘