IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2008 / 28TH SRAVANA 1930 LA.App..No. 1398 of 2008() -------------------------- LAR.211/1994 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM .................... APPELLANT: APPELLANT/RESPONDENT ------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BAANTH BALAJI RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS/CLAIMANT AND 2ND RESPONDENT. ----------------------------------------------------- 1. K.SANKARANAN SUDHAKARAN, VELAYAMVILAKATHU VEEDU, VAYALAKATHU MURI, KAZHAKUTTOM. 2. SAROJINI RADHA, VIRUTHIVILAKATHU VEEDU, KAZHAKUTTOM, 3. G.VIJAYARAGHAVAN, S/O. GOPALA PILLAI, WORKING AS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/ REGISTRAR, ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY PARK (KERALA), KARIAVATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON I.A. NO.3132/2008 IN L.A..A. NO.1398/2008 DISMISSED 19.8.2008 SD/- PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,J. ------------------------ L.A.A.No.1398 OF 2008 ------------------------ Dated this the 19th day of August, 2008 JUDGMENT This appeal by the Government pertains to acquisition of 4.70 Ares of land in Sy.No.210/14 of Attipara Village in Thiruvananthapuram which was acquired for the purpose of Electronics Techno Park pursuant to a notification under Section 4 (1) dated 18.8.1991. The Land acquisition Officer fixed the land value at the rate of Rs.4,900/- per Are. the learned Subordinate Judge invoked Order 13 Rule 10 of C.P.C. and relied on the judgment of the same court in L.A.R. No.93/1994 and re-fixed the land value at Rs.8,026/- per Are. Having gone through the judgment of the reference court and having heard the learned Government Pleader, I find that the learned Subordinate Judge was justified in following the judgment in L.A.R. 93/1994. the only question is whether the judgment in L.A.R. No.93/1994 has become final. The Registry reports and the Government Pleader also L.A.A..No. 1398/2008 2 agrees that L.A.A. No.1225/2000 filed against L.A.R. No.93/1994 has been dismissed. Under the above circumstances, I do not find any warrant for admitting this appeal. The appeal will stand dismissed in limine. (PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE) dpk