XI—HC-22 311w m um). Na .$?03/©3 . ..................................... mm W 20¢} 13‘02.2004 Petitioner bv Smt. Renu Kochar, Advocata. Smt. Hameeda Siddque, Advocate takes 1101ice 011 behalf of Respondents. «X The pctiticnm“ has pmfemcd this. petition ukdor Alticle 226/227 of tho Constitution of India being aggrieved by the order dated 22m Januaxy, 2003 iiassed by the Respondent‘No2 whereby the services of the petitioner has be en terminated. The brief facts leading to fiHng of thie writ petition are that since 4.8. 1971 the petitioner was rking aS helper (khalasi) in the Railway. He alongwith three other mployees namely S.K.Pate1, Ram La} and Shiitam were arrested in neetion with the offence under Section 3(A) of the R.P.U.P. Act. after completion of the trial all the i/bur persons Were convicted de judgment dated 25.11.1994 passed m Case No. 1392/32 by the Special Railway Magistrateg Raipur and sentenced to undergo 3 days rigoroue imprisonment and to pay a tine of Rs. 1000/ —. Even c er passing of that judgment the petitioner continued in service but all of a sudden after 7 years the Respondent No. 3 sent a letter on 5,3,2001 for supply of the cop of the judgment within 10 days. So n after teceipt. of that notice the petitioner submitted reply that a C iininal Revision No. ?3 1/95 has been preferred in the High Court o Madhya Pradesh and the same is still pending. However, all of Sudden the Respondent No.2 removed the petitioner from service n 21‘ 1.2003. o n d i y XI-HC‘22 WW w-VHm‘E‘-ma lac} mm . ....................................W 20f) ..............................................m ................................................