HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^\ W.P.(C)No. 1502/2010 R.K. Rai, S/o Late Shri G. Rai, aged about 62 years, R/o O. No. 8-B, Street 43, Sector-7, Bhilai, Durg Distt. Durg (C.G.) Versus 1. Bhilai Steel Plant, Through - Managing Director, Espat Bhawan, Bhilai, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 2. Estate Officer, Under Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupant) Act, 1971. Hindi Medium Middle School, Maroda Sector, Bhilai, Durg (C.G.) 3. Superintendent of Police, Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance : <. Shri T.K. Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. ORDER (07.04.2010) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard. Petitioner-R.K. Rai has filed this petition against the order dated 27.03.2010 passed by the Estate Officer under Sub-section (I) of Section 5 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971(hereinafter referred to as "the Act, 1971"). Shri T.K. Tiwari submits that the provision of Section 4 of the Act, 1971 has not been complied with and no proper i, RAHUL I"! T"nw W.P. (C) No. 1502/2010 7^ opportunity of hearing was granted to the petitioner before passing the impugned order. Admittedly, the order passed under Section 5 or under Section 5(b) or under Section 5 (c) or Section 7 are appealable orders under Section 9 of the aforesaid Act, 1971. In the opinion of this Court the remedy of appeal is efficacious remedy available to the petitioner. In view ofthe above, I am not inclined to entertain this petition for further hearing. The petition, therefore, is dismissed summarily. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority under the aforesaid provision of Act, 1971. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge