IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4281 of 2009 BANSHI LAL PRASAD S/O LATE JUNI PRASAD, R/O AT+PO - BENUSAR BUSUARGH, DISTT- SIWAN. ……..PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH MR. ANJANI KUMAR SINGH, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 2. MR. ANJANI KUMAR SINGH, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, VIKASH BHAWAN, PATNA 3. JAI PRAKASH UNIVERSITY, CHAPRA, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR MR. VIJAY PRATAP KUMAR, DISTT- SARAN AT CHAPRA. 4. MR. RAM VINAY SHARMA, THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, JAI PRAKASH UNIVERSITY, CHAPRA, DISTT- SARAN AT CHAPRA. 5. REGISTRAR, SRI VIJAY PRATAP KUMAR, JAI PRAKASH UNIVERSITY, CHAPRA, DISTT- SARAN AT CHAPARA. 6. VIBHASH KR. YADAV, BABA SAHEB BHEEM RAO AMBEDKAR BIHAR UNIVERSITY MUZAFFARPUR, DISTT- MUZAFFARPUR. 7. MR. RAJDEO SINGH, THE VICE CHANCELLOR, BABA SAHEB BHEEM RAO AMBEDKAR BIHAR UNIVERSITY MUZAFFARPUR, DISTT- MUZAFFARPUR 8. SRI VIBHASH KR. YADAV THE REGISTRAR BABA SAHEB BHEEM RAO AMBEDKAR BIHAR UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR, DISTT- MUZAFFARPUR 9. DAYA KANT MISHRA, THE FINANCE OFFICER, JAI PRAKASH UNIVERSITY, CHAPRA, DISTT- CHAPRA. 10. B.K. TIWARI, PRINCIPAL D.A.V. COLLEGE SIWAN, DISTT. SIWAN……………………………………….RESPONDENTS. For the petitioner : Mr. Shubh Narain Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Basant Kr.Singh, AC to GP-V For the University : Mr. Shivendra Kishore, Advocate. ----------- 19/ 11.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner for initiating a proceeding of contempt against the opposite parties for willfully flouting order of this court dated 23.06.2008 passed in - 2 - C.W.J.C. No.980 of 2007 by which the said writ petition was allowed and authorities of the J.P. University were directed to pay the balance amount of interest on Group Insurance after calculating the compound interest at the rate of 12.5 % per annum. The said authorities were also directed to calculate the difference of pay for the period on the basis of revised pay scale within three months from that date and make payments to the petitioner within one month thereafter, if not earlier paid. 3. It is an admitted fact that the difference of pay has been duly paid to the petitioner on the basis of revised pay scale. So far the balance amount on Group Insurance is concerned, it has also been paid but with simple interest and interest has not been calculated at the rate of 12.5 % per annum compound interest. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter is pending before the Apex Court and hence he wants to withdraw this petition in order to raise the question of payment of compound interest at the rate of 12.5 % per annum after disposal of the case pending in the Apex Court. 4. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Harish (S.N.Hussain, J.)