IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 5TH OCTOBER 2009 / 13TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 26239 of 2009(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ABDUNNASIR M, S/O.HUSAIN, AGED 45 YEARS, TUTOR IN MLT, MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT(ON DEPUTATION AS ASSISTANT PROFESSOR SIMET, PAYYANNUR, KANNUR DIST.) BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION & CONVENOR(DPC(LOWER), DIRECTORATE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, TRIVANDRUM. SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.26239/2009-Y ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 5th day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T The main prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the second respondent promote the petitioner as Tutor MLT with effect from 02/05/2001. In answer to the representation submitted by the petitioner, the Government as per Ext.P4 directed the Director of Medical Education to review the select list for the post of Tutor in MLT for the year 2001 by giving assignment to the petitioner for the post of Tutor in MLT with effect from the date of occurrence of third vacancy of Tutor in MLT in 2001, i.e. from 03/05/2001. 2. Aggrieved by the delay in convening the review D.P.C, the petitioner filed Ext.P5 representation dated 01/08/2009 before the second respondent. Since no action is forthwith coming in the matter, he has filed this writ petition seeking various reliefs. Learned Government Pleader on instructions from the second respondent submits that the meeting of the D.P.C will be convened within two months and after obtaining the W.P.(C). No.26239/2009 -:2:- concurrence of the P.S.C. The same is recorded. The second respondent will see that the time limit provided as above is complied with. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms