1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRI.REVISION NO.26 OF 2008 (SUDHIR PUNDLIK GAIKI Vs MANGESH DEVIDAS GUDADHE & 3 OTH.) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Shri S.S.Murthy, Advocate for Revision Applicant. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : OCTOBER 15, 2008. 1. The applicant, a son of deceased farmer who committed suicide, presumably because of failure to come out of the clutches of the money lenders, has filed this application for revision of judgment and order passed by Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati, acquitting the respondents who had allegedly grabbed the victim's land. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant took me through the judgment as well as evidence on record and contended that the learned Additional Sessions Judge had not taken into consideration the evidence of P.W. 2 Vivek who had specifically stated that 2-3 days before the suicide the accused 2 persons had manhandled the victim and told him not to harvest cotton and chilly crops. 3. Now, how this can amount to 'abetment' as defined in Section 307 of the Penal code is not clear. Sympathies cannot take place as proof under law and, therefore, the revision is dismissed. JUDGE RR.