CWP(T) No. 2588 of 2008. 09.03.2009 Present: Mr. Lokinder Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Additional Advocate General and Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents. The only case set out by the petitioner is to treat the period of training of two and a half years with effect from 22nd July, 1986 to 1st June, 1988 as period on duty. The petitioner has failed to point out any direction/instruction issued by the State Government on the basis of which this period could be treated on duty. So far as the medical officers are concerned, according to the reply filed by the respondents/State, there are instructions to count the training period on duty. In absence of instructions issued by the State Government for counting the period of training on duty qua the petitioner, the same cannot be counted as prayed for by her. Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. March 09, 2009. (sck)