IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17750 of 2011 Dr. Bimalendra Prasad Singh , S/o Late Krishandeo Singh, Kirtan Bhawan Road, P.O.+P.S.+Distt.- Madhubani…………………… Petitioner Versus 1. Lalit Narain Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga through the Registrar. 2. Vice Chancellor, Lalit Narain Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. 3. The Registrar, Lalit Narain Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. 4. Principal, V.S.J. College, Raj Nagar, At+P.O. – Raj Nagar, Distt. – Madhubani. ……… Respondents ---------------------------------- 2 12.10.2011 Heard Sri Bishwanath Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondents/Lalit Narain Mithila University. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 30.11.2009, as ‘Reader’ from V.S.J. College, Raj Nagar, Madhubani, under Lalit Narain Mithila University, has prayed for directing the Respondents to clear all his retiral dues. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing has been paid to the petitioner till date. Neither retiral dues nor arrear of salary has also been paid to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also drawn my attention to ‘Annexure -1’ to the writ petition and submits that the University has already admitted the arrear pension amount to the tune of Rs. 6,32,447.00/- . However, even that amount has not been paid. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has also approached the authority concerned, but till date, neither any decision has been taken on 2 his representation nor payment has been made. In view of the facts and circumstances, the writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before Respondent No. 2/Vice- Chancellor, Lalit Narain Mithila University, within a period of six weeks from today regarding the claim made in the present writ petition. If such representation is filed, the Respondent No. 2 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of filing of such representation. If the Respondent No. 2 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, the Respondent No. 2 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within eight weeks from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction the writ petition stands disposed of. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)