1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5899 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.2266 of 2008 Shri Jaykumar Sevaklal Bhanushali & Anr. ..Appellants/ Applicants Versus Shri Bahubali Bapurao Ekhande & Ors. ..Respndents Shri Santosh Jagtap, Advocate, for the appellants. Shri S.D.Thokade, Advocate, for the respondent No.1. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 10th September, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. First Appeal is admitted. 3. The respondents filed a suit for compensation for malicious prosecution by the present appellant. The suit has been decreed holding that the present applicants had falsely prosecuted the respondent. Compensation of Rs. 70,000/- was granted to respondent No.1 and Rs.15,000/- each to respondent Nos. 2 2 and 3. 4. The learned Counsel for the appellants seeks stay. According to him, Rs.50,000/- is already deposited before the trial Court. In view of this statement and in view of the fact that the Appeal is admitted, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The respondents shall be at liberty to withdraw the amount of Rs.50,000/- which is deposited before the trial Court on furnishing security to the satisfaction of the trial Court to bring back the money if such order is passed in future. Application stands disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)