M ‘ / / @ WW’ :3 -J§?€i‘-§§ , §.B. {Service Matter! ‘ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHRATI‘;SGARH] WRIT PETXTIOMS) N0. ‘p’i [2010. PETITIONER: / Maxwadi Ram son ofLate Bandhu Smgh aged about 53 years, resxdence of vxllage Songara, Pohce Stanon Pratappur, Amblkapur, Dls'mct Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. ‘ versus Beepgmia‘k / ‘1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Water Resoux‘ces _ 3&0) Department DKS Bhawan, Raipur’ \q.”9 ‘ Chhatusgarh Engneer-In-Chlef Water Resources Department, Raxpur, Chhaattxsgarh / 3. Chief Engineer, Water Resource 7 Department, Hasdeo Basin, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. / WRIT PETITION UNQER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA \E$g 2 At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of thi Court rendered in Ramchandra Kurup Vs. State of C.G. 85 othe s [W.P. (S) No.3663/2009] and other connected matters decided o 23rd November, 2009. Learned counsel prays that this petition may e disposed of in terms of Ramchandra Kurup (supra), to which learn d counsel appearing for the State has no objection. Accordingly, the writ p tition is allowed in terms of order passed in the case of Ramchandra urup (supra). The impugned order dated 8.6.2009 (Annexure P-l), di ecting recovery of annual increment is quashed. No recovery of ayment of annual increments to the petitioner can be made purs nt to the impugned order. If the amount \ WW. .ad) I. Za/zw 200 WWW azn an?“m mW (Wag) mm m WW #‘ fséW §§ aimm \ SB z Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastéva J. é 23-06-2010 Shri C.J.K. Rao, counse ‘for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents. Heard. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 8.6.2009 (Annexure A—l), whereby the order granting benefit of increments, in respect of Assistant Grade-III who have not passed Hindi ’I‘ypewrit‘ing Examination, has been cancelied. WWW wmm Wm an zoo 31mm (We) mmam -Z’ WW wW %u'aifaqaw1%¥1 has already been recovered, amount with interest at the ra Praveen No order as to costs. \ Sd/ ra Mohan Shrivastayg, Judge Manind the petitioner is entitled to the said :e of 6% per annum.