1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8324 OF 2009 Ganpat Tatya Rupnavar (since deceased) through L.Rs Dinkar Ganpat Rupnavar & Ors. .. Petitioners versus Vithal Tatya Rupnavar & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.U.B.Nighot for the petitioners. Ms.Manjiri Parasnis for the respondent No.1. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 5th October 2009. P.C: . Looking at the stage at which application was made by the petitioner at Exhibit 113 and considering the fact that the order passed on the said application is purely interlocutory in nature, no case is made out for interference at this stage when the suit is posted for final arguments. If the decree passed in the suit is adverse to the petitioners, the petitioners can always challenge the order impugned while preferring an appeal against the decree. Subject to what is observed above, the petition is not entertained and the same is disposed of. (A.S.OKA,J)