Crl. Misc. No.M-11575 of 2011 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-11575 of 2011 (O & M) Date of decision: 09.09.2011 Bajinder ..... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Bhardwaj, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab, for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.Surinder Garg, Advocate, for respondents No.4 to 7. **** RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) This is a petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to the official respondents (respondents Noi.1 to 3) to properly investigate the case (FIR No.36 dated 18.03.2011 under sections 324, 323 and 34 IPC, later on sections 325 and 326 IPC were added, registered at police station Gidderbaha, District Sri Muktsar Sahib). Learned State counsel, at the outset, submits that the investigation has been carried out by the investigating agency in a totally fair and impartial manner. Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.4 to 7. He submits that pursuant to the said FIR, the accused (respondents No.4 to 7) applied for anticipatory bail and were granted the concession by this court. It appears that the investigating agency is making efforts to join Crl. Misc. No.M-11575 of 2011 (O & M) ::2:: the witnesses in the investigation. Under these circumstances, there is nothing to show that investigation is not being conducted by the investigating agency in a fair and impartial manner. Thus, there is no ground for interference by this court under inherent jurisdiction of this court. Dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE September 09, 2011 sukhpreet