IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22861 of 2010 MAHENDRA KUMAR SINHA @ MAHENDRA KISHOR PRASAD son of Nathuni Prasad ---------------------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 26.7.2010 Heard Learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Torture for demand of dowry is there but it can easily be negativated by the allegations of petitioner’s attempt to have illicit relation with the complainant. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, differences were there in between the wife and husband. Wife deserted the husband for which husband filed a matrimonial case for restitution but she is not ready to accompany him. Otherwise, a son will never support the act of his father for his having illicit relation with his wife. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Arrah, in connection with Complaint Case no.1634 C of 2009 ,subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh,J )