1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.2481 OF 2008 (MAH. RAJYA SHIKSHAN SANSTHA MAHAMANDAL Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTH.) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : D.D.SINHA & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : JULY 22, 2008. 1. Heard Shri B.G.Kulkarni, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In the present writ petition the petitioner is seeking general direction to quash and set aside the entire process of granting permission to start Primary, Secondary and Higher Secondary Schools in the State of Maharashtra from academic session 2008-2009. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Apex Court vide judgment dated 16.01.2008 passed in Appeal(Civil) No. 1105 of 2008 as well as other connected matters, in para No.13 has observed thus : 2 “13. We therefore allow these appeals, set aside the judgment of the High Court. The government order dated 16.5.2006 permitting new schools will, therefore, continue to be in force. We however make it clear that if any school is found to have flouted or not fulfilled the parameters prescribed by the Education Code or the conditions stipulated by the State Government in the order dated 16.05.2006, the concerned authorities of the State Government will be at liberty to take appropriate action against the defaulting schools, including cancellation of the permission. Appeals are disposed of accordingly. Parties to bear their respective costs.” 3. The observations given by the Apex Court are loud and clear. It is open for the Education Department to cancel permission of such schools, those who do not fulfill the conditions stipulated by the State Government in the order dated 16.05.2006 as well as parameters prescribed by the Education Department etc. applicable in this regard. 4. In the instant case, the petitioner has not brought to our notice any individual school/schools, which has/ have flouted any condition or requirement in view of the decision of 3 this Court or any other law, rule which is time being in force and applicable in this regard. In absence thereof, we are not inclined to show any indulgence in the matter. The writ petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE RR.