IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No 178 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- BANK OF BARODA (THRO.BRANCH MANAGER) Versus SHIVRAM RAMJI GADHVI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Appeal from Order No. 178 of 1995 MR KI SHAH for Appellant No. SERVED BY AFFIX.-(R) for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI Date of decision: 13/01/2005 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. This Appeal from Order is directed against the order dated 22nd April, 1995 below application for interim injunction in Special Civil Suit No.22 of 1995 passed by the learned Civil Judge (S.D.) Kutch, whereby the trial Court has granted ex-parte ad-interim injunction. 2. I have heard the learned advocates for the respective parties and have perused the relevant record. This Court while admitting this Appeal from Order, has stayed the said order. 3. In that view of the matter, it is clear that practically, the Appeal from Order has become infructuous because by way of interlocutory order, ex-parte order was vacated. Hence, the Appeal from Order stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Liberty to apply in case of difficulty. [K.S. JHAVERI, J.] /phalguni/