IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.19822 OF 2009 SHYAM LAL VISHWAKARMA, SON OF HARI VISHWAKARMA VILLAGE KAUDIA, P.S. VISHRAMPUR, DISTRICT PALAMU (JHARKHAND) VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the first information report. It is stated that there is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner and he has not been put on test identification parade. From the order of the learned Sessions Judge it appears that during investigation it has come that petitioner had barrowed mobile phone from the accused to ring up at his parental home because of which his name has been implicated in the case and even in the confessional statement of the co-accused, he has not named the petitioner as accomplice. Petitioner is in custody since 14.1.2009 and it is stated that he has no criminal antecedent. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the application is - 2 - allowed. Petitioner (Shyam Lal Vishwakarma) is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Ambha P.S. case No.32 of 2007. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)