IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16423 of 2011 1. Raj Kumar, Son of Late Laxman Singh, resident of Village Tilouthi, P.S. - Tilouthi, District - Rohtas at Sasaram. 2. Bipin Singh, Son of Late Mundar Singh, Resident of Village - Bhadsha, P.S. - Amjhore, District - Rohtas at Sasaram. . . . . . Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram. 3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Rohtas. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Dehri On Sone (Rohtas) 5. The Block Development Officer, Tilouthu, Rohtas. .Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2/ 08.11.2011 The petitioners, who are P.D.S. dealers within Tilouthu Block in the district of Rohtas, pray for quashing letter no.15 dated 02.08.2011, whereby they have been directed to refund the value of undistributed rice at APL rate of Rs.13.70 per kg. The quantity due against petitioner no.1 is shown as 312.78 quintals of ricewhereas the quantity due against petitioner no.2 is shown as 122.72 quintals of rice. Learned counsel submits that no notice was issued to petitioner no.2 and in fact notice was issued in the name of his father late Mundar Singh, who was a P.D.S. dealer, who received the rice under SGRY Scheme. Learned counsel submits that petitioner no.2 did not receive any rice either under SGRY Scheme or Food for Work Scheme, as he has been subsequently appointed as P.D.S. dealer in place of his father on compassionate ground. Counsel for the State submits that petitioner no.2 should raise all these points before the Block Development 2 Officer, Tilouthu. So far as petitioner no.1 is concerned, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 with the condition that the petitioner no.1 would either deposit 20% of the value of undistributed rice at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within eight weeks from today. As no notice was issued to petitioner no.2, the Block Development Officer, Tilouthu would issue fresh notice in the name of petitioner no.2, who succeeded his father as P.D.S. dealer preferably within a period of four weeks from today. In the meantime, no coercive steps would be taken against the petitioners. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)