F.A.Rto. 38 012087 SingteBench: Hon'bteShriDIMpRaoSahebOeihmukN,.!. APPEI.tANT APPLICANr RESPONDENTS J.P.IUIIshra,aged-46yeais Son ofShti D.P. Mishra RA>G-4,Sector-2, AtranU Vibar Colony,Raipur,Distt.-Rai|Hir<C©) Versus 1. GhanshyamYadav S/oQ^anand Yaelaw Rural Agrieulture B(tn. 0 cw, 0!o Assistant Project CTReer, Arang, District- Raipur (CG) 2. PurushGtemSharnB, ftged - SO years, Son of ehaturtrfiuj Mlshra, R/o eiiouflburi &ida, SErt])) Martet,Arang,DisWct-^ipur(e(^ 3. B.L.Chandrakar,ageel-42^ars, Son of Shri R,L. Chandiakar, Shyam BazarWaKl, Arang, Dlstrict-^aipur ^SG^ 4. DitpKumarYadu,8^|ed-43years,SoR of Shri Ramda^tYadt.i, R/OMahaimtf Para, Arang, Distriiet- Raipur (CG) Present:- None for the appallant. ORALOTOER O'assed on3"'Aprit, 2007) No one appeare for the appellant w^ien U^ appeat (s eaBed. Bartier also during Uie day when ttils app^ilwas calted, rroonettadappearedifor the appellant and no repi'esentation was naade on,|t-brttalfduBtowhich ths F.A. was passed over. Even now in the second round when ttis appeal is catted, no one appears for the appellant and no represBi^ttm^ is made on behatf <?f the appellant. In this view of tha matter, ttus appari 1 ' isdtsinissedindefaultoftheappeltantNoorderastocosts. Consequently, I.A. No. 1^2007, ficy pem^iflnteconYwtUw'F.A^ to M.A. also stands disposed of. Priya Sd/- DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge