IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.724 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:01.02.2011. Khem Raj ...Petitioner Versus S. Dilbagh Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. R.S.Bajaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 17.12.2010 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Jalandhar by which an application filed by the petitioner for re-calling of witnesses of the landlord, namely, Dilbag Singh and Dildar Singh for re-cross-examination, has been declined. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner could not cross-examine the aforesaid witnesses of the landlord properly as he could not ask some material questions. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the available record. The eviction petition was filed on 17.07.2007 in which issues were framed on 29.01.2008. The landlord concluded his evidence on 01.04.2009 and the tenant concluded his evidence on 11.05.2010. When the case was fixed for rebuttal evidence and arguments, the tenant/petitioner had filed the present application for recalling of the aforesaid two witnesses of the landlord for cross- examination. The learned Rent Controller has committed no error of jurisdiction in rejecting the application because if this procedure is adopted, then there would be no end to the trial of the suit/eviction petition. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the present revision petition and as such, the same is hereby dismissed in limine, however, without any order as to costs. February 01, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE