IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12763 of 2009 NAGHMA PERVEEN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 05. 08.01.2010 This case has come at the instance of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by order dated 25.11.2009, the claim of the petitioner was for payment of family pension. However, inadvertently, the word “Post Retiral Dues” has wrongly been typed instead of “ Family pension”. Let the word “ Family Pension” be read as “Post Retiral Dues”. As prayed for, two weeks further time is allowed to file representation. Accordingly, the order dated 25.11.2009 is modified to the above extent. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)