IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48636 of 2008 KUNDAN KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 16.1.2009 Heard Sri Manoj Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is not named in the FIR of a case under Section 302 IPC which was earlier registered under Section 307 etc IPC. Some of the paragraphs of the case diary have been referred to by the learned Judge who dismissed the prayer for bail of the petitioner but the contention is that those paragraphs do not contain any direct material indicating the participation of the petitioner in any manner in commission of the offence. The contention further is that it is merely a suspicion and the confessional statement is fictitious. The petitioner never gave any statement to any one. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in Sri Krishnapuri P.S.Case No. 120 of 2008. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )