IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-14304 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:01.11.2011 R.S. Sharma . . .Petitioner Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.T.S. Sangha, Sr. Advocate, with Mr.J.S. Lalli, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sagar Deswal, AAG, Haryana. Mr.Rajesh Lamba, Advocate, for the complainant. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner being a personnel manager had no say in the decision making of the company. He further submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation. This fact is admitted by learned counsel for the State, on instructions received from SI Ram Kumar. Although, learned counsel for the complainant has vehemently opposed the bail application and has submitted that the main accused have not even moved bail application. Be that as it may, without making any observation on the merits, order dated 11.5.2011 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions already contained therein. Petition is disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) NOVEMBER 01, 2011 JUDGE Vivek