yi»LOa«TOF OWATHSGMW AT BIUtSfUR W. P.(S1 No. J637 of 2007 Petitioners Versus Respondents I. Srnt. Kaidwn Ld, W/o. Shri Arvind Lal. tged about 43 yeors, Asristant Teocher, 6ovt. Sirls Middle School- Dorri, Block - Katghora. Distt.- Korbo (C.&.) 2. Sfflt. SyaneshNWri l^ithore, W/o. Shri Shyom Lal Rathore, aged dbout 40 years, Assistant Teahcer, 6ovt. Primary School-Kendailthar, Btock - Katghora. Oistt.-Korba (C.&.) 3. Het Ran Rathore, S/o. Shri Bhagwat' Prosad Rathore, <ged about 36 ye<FS, Asastant Teocher, fiovt. Hr. Sec. SchooWnmnipali (N.T.P^:.), Btock - Katghora, Distt.- Korba(C.6.) 1. State of Chhcttisgarh Thrwighs- The Secretory, Oepartment of Education. &.K.S. BhauftUt. Raipur (C.6.) 2. Oirectot', Public Instructfon Chh<rttlsg<rh Sovf. Rupur 3. Oistrict EdiKatton Offk»r, t>istl-. - Korba (C.6.) 4. Bbck Bducation Officer, Block- Katghwa, Distt. - Korba (C.6.) ^ SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. ^gmhatri. J Present: Mr. A.S. Rcyput, Advocate for the petitioners. AAs. Deepali Parriey, Panel Lawyer for State/respondents. OR&ER (Passed on tfiis 21** Dcy of March, 2007} 1. The question of !<•» involwd herein osto whelher the petitfoners are entitled to regulor pay scole w.e.f. the dut-e of initiot appointmen* or from the ckite of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appeoring for the petitioners as wwill «far the State/responderris jointty submit-that th< facts ond question of IONI involved the pre^nt frit petitton ore the same to that of in W. P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Suahil TN»<ri and ottiers VSL Stote eovemment- of Chhcttisgorh A ottiers), t»hichNWS «ltot»edvide order dated 7.11.2006. Subhash 3. In view of -the above-stoted submissions macte ty leamed counsel for the parties, Ihe writ petition is allowied in the same terms. No order «Bto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge -y-^