IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:27758 of 2008 Between: V.K. Kathuria, S/o. Jai Krishna Cement Corporation of India Limited, New Delhi. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 A.K. Shrivastava S/o. Not Known to the Petitioner Cement Corporation of India Limited, Core-V, Scope Complex, 7, Lodhi Road, New Delhli. 2 H.K. Harkawath S/o. Not Known to the Petitioner Cement Corporation of India Limited, Core-V, Scope Complex, 7, Lodhi Road, New Delhli. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.S.SRINIVASA IYENGAR The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus be given to the respondents to pay the difference of salary and other benefits due to petitioner for the period 20.01.1998 to 23.07.1999 and for not considering the representation made by me 22.07.2005 and 22.08.2005 to the respondents.” At the hearing, Sri M.S.Srinivasa Iyengar, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition with proper parties being impleaded thereto. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, WPMP.No.36373 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 22nd DECEMBER, 2008. kvni