1 ABA-18.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.18 OF 2011 1. Rahul Rajendra Shinde, 2. Machindra Uttam Dhongade, 3. Mukesh Gulab Ubale & 4. Nishant Rajendra Shinde .... Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Shri P.G. Chavan for the Applicants. Ms P.P. Bhosale, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JANUARY 18, 2011 P.C: 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by four persons against whom Crime No.456 of 2010 has been registered at Naupada Police Station, District Thane. One of them, Rahul, had also given a report upon which Crime No.451 of 2010 has been registered at the Naupada Police Station. The applicant Rahul had himself sustained injuries in the incident and was required to take treatment in a hospital. Applicant No.2. Machindra is also alleged to have participated in an assault on Chetan Angre who sustained simple injuries. Rahul allegedly 2 ABA-18.11 hit the first informant Vinod Patekar who also sustained simple injuries. Therefore, the presence of the applicants Rahul and Machindra in custody for the purpose of investigation may not be necessary. As far as applicants Mukesh and Nishant are concerned, they have assaulted Pravin Popalkar who has sustained a grievous hurt, a fracture. In view of this, applicants Mukesh and Nishant cannot be granted bail. Therefore, in the event of their arrest applicant No.1 Rahul Rajendra Shinde and applicant No.2 Machindra Uttam Dhongade be released on bail in C.R. No.456 of 2010 of Naupada Police Station, District Thane on their furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs.25,000/- per person on the condition that they shall report at the police station concerned on 28-1-2011 at 10:00 a.m. and thereafter as and when required by the I.O.. They shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and they shall not leave the country without the prior permission of the trial Court. 3 ABA-18.11 2. This order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge-sheeted, the applicants may furnish fresh bond before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court, dated 2-12-2010, delivered in Criminal Appeal No.2271 of 2010, arising out of SLP (Cri.) No. 7615 of 2009 {Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.}. 3. The application of applicant No.3 Mukesh Gulab Ubale and applicant No.4 Nishant Rajendra Shinde is rejected. 4. The application accordingly stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)