IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2011 / 2ND POUSHA 1933 WP(C).No. 34917 of 2011(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SAFIYA N.M., W/O.V.A.MOHAMMED KUTTY, VALIYAPARAMBIL HOUSE, PUDUSSERY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY), TALUK OFFICE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 001 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, PALAKKAD-678 001 R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.S JAMAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: STK WP(C).No. 34917 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 17/11/2000. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY ACT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE IST RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE UNDER SECTION 34 OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY ACT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY IST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P A TO JUDGE STK S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No.34917 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges revenue recovery proceedings for recovery of loan amounts due from the petitioner to the 2nd respondent. The petitioner does not dispute the liability to pay or the quantum. The petitioner only seeks two more months' time to pay off the amount. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to keep in abeyance recovery proceedings for a period of two months to enable the petitioner to pay the amounts within that time. If the petitioner pays the amounts within two months, proceedings for recovery shall be dropped. However, if the petitioner fails to pay, it would be open to the respondents to continue proceedings as now initiated without having to issue any fresh notice or proceedings in that regard. Sd/- S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE //True copy// P.A. TO JUDGE shg/