IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31835 of 2008 RANJEET K MAHTO Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Marni Devi ----------- 2. 20.10-.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner, who is the husband, apprehends arrest in a complaint case under Sections 498A, 494 and other provisions of the Penal Code Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Considering the allegation that in a case for dowry he ousted the complainant and remarried, this Court is not persuaded that the present is a fit case for anticipatory bail. The application is rejected. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)