IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2008 / 1ST ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 9325 of 2008(S) ------------------------- OP.1413/2007 of FAMILY COURT,THRISSUR .................... PETITIONER: --------------- SINDHU SIDHARTHAN,HOUSE WIFE,AGED 37 YEARS,W/O.SIDHARTHAN,4-H, CHELUR TOWERS, POTHOL DESOM,THRISSUR TALUK AND DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K) SRI.AJEESH K.SASI RESPONDENTS(S): ---------------- 1. SIDHARTHAN K.K,S/O.KOPRA KUNJUMON, MANANTHALA AMSOM AND DESOM,CHAVAKKAD TALUK, REP.BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER RAJAN,S/O.KOPRA APPU,MANANTHALA AMSOM AND DESOM,CHAVAKKAD TALUK. ADDITIONAL RESPONDENT NO.2 IMPLEADED ADDL.R2 THE CORPORATION OF THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THRISSUR. (IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 19/03/2008 IN WP(C)NO.9325/2006) ADV. SRI.K.B.MOHANDAS,SC,THRISSUR CORPORATION FOR R2 SRI.LELLULAL T.G.THUNDATHIL FOR R2 SRI.RAJIT SRI.RANJIT BABU SRI.SANTHI S.PREM(ADV.COMMISSIONER) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 9325 of 2008(S) A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL PETITION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 15/10/2007 EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT AND THE PETITION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 15/10/2007. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 30/11/2007 EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT AND PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT AND PETITION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 04/02/2008 EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 13/02/2008 IN I.A.NO.557/2008 IN O.P.NO.1413/2007 EXT. OF RESPONDENT NO.1:- EXT.R1(a) COPIES OF RECEIPTS ISSUED BY THE THRISSUR CORPORATION IN FAVOUR OF THE RESPONDENT. \\TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE P.R.RAMAN & T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W.P.(C).No.9325 of 2008-S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2008 J U D G M E N T J U D G M E N T RAMAN, J. The petitioner herein is the respondent in O.P.No.1413/2007 on the file of Family Court, Thrissur. That is a petition for cancellation of a document executed by the petitioner herein based on a power of attorney executed by the respondent herein. The contention was that though there was a power of attorney executed earlier, the same was cancelled subsequently, and therefore, no right is passed based on the deed so executed. The matter is still pending. In that I.A No.557/2008 was filed seeking to restrain the petitioner herein in the manner as stated in the petition. The court below passed Ext.P6 order directing the parties to maintain status quo. It is challenging Ext.P6 order that the present writ petition is filed. What is sought for by way of relief in this writ petition is for a clarification that the status quo order passed by the court below Ext.P6 will not stand in the way of the application for renewal of the licence to be considered and disposed of by the Thrissur Corporation in accordance with law. If at all such a clarification is required, it is open to the petitioner to move W.P.(C).NO.9325/2008 -:2:- the court below which is not done. So the petitioner cannot straight away seek any direction from this Court. Secondly, at this stage it was pointed out by the learned counsel for the respondent that the Corporation already renewed the licence in favour of the respondent. If so, nothing survives in this writ petition. The same is accordingly, dismissed. Interim order is vacated. In case the petitioner has got a case that the licence ought not have been renewed in favour of the respondent, he can work out his remedy and dismissal of this writ petition will not stand in his way. P.R.RAMAN, Judge T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, Judge ms