IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18123 of 2008 SUJEET KUMAR PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 25.07.2008 Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with. Manjhauliya P.S. Case No. 99 of 2007 for the offences registered under sections 304(B),201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that on perusal of the FIR it would appear that there is no specific allegation against this petitioner. The allegations are general in nature. It is further submitted that FIR was registered on 5th of May, 2007 and on the same day the complaint was also filed by the informant who happens to be the brother of the deceased. On perusal of the same it would appear that the deceased while expressing her unhappiness informed her parents vide letter dated 28th of April 2007 which is brought on record and annexed as annexure-6 by filing a supplementary affidavit on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that on perusal of the same it would appear that she narrating the details of her stay in the matrimonial house, although she is making a specific assertion to the effect that she has no grievance against the husband who used to give affection to her as before. It is further submitted that co-accused Raghunath Pandey against whom also there is no specific allegation has been enlarged on bail by this court vide order dated 15.07.2008 in Cr. Misc. No. 12301 of 2008. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing on behalf of the State on the - 2 - other hand opposes the prayer for bail, however he is not in position to refute the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner Having considered the submissions and the materials brought on record, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, namely, Sujeet Kumar Pandey be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 99 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)