IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.911 of 2007 ZULFIQUAR AHMAD Versus GULZAR & ORS ----------- 3. 17.9.2008. N.H./ This application has been filed against the order dated 22nd June,2007 passed by Family Court, Gaya in Misc. Case No.9 of 2005/42 of 2000 thereby the petitioner has been directed to pay maintenance to her four children at the rate of Rs.400/- per month. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is truck driver. He is ready to keep his children and maintain them. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no means to pay Rs.1600/- per month to the opposite parties. Considered the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned order. The admitted fact is that the mother of the children was the wife of the petitioner and the opposite party nos.1 to 4 are children of the petitioner. They are residing along with their mother. There is also allegation of neglect and allegation that the petitioner has divorced his wife. Under the facts and circumstances, it would not proper to interfere in the impugned order granting maintenance to the children. So far the quantum of maintenance is concerned, the amount is quite proper which is also not even sufficient to meet the bare needs of the children. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )