IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16231 of 2007 ============================================= 1. Budhdeo Das, s/o- Late Basudeo Das, r/o- Mohalla Lallu Pokhar, Argara Road, P.s.- Kashim Bazar, District- Munger. 2. Binod Kumar Sharma, s/o- Late Laxmi Sharma, r/o- Mohalla- Gayatri Nagar, Purab Sarai, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Munger. 3. Gopal Prasad Yadav, s/o- Late Rameshwar Yadav, r/o- mohalla Khoja Bazar, P.S.- Kashim Bazar, District- Munger 4. Shrawan Kumar Mandal, s/o- Late Shibu Mandal, r/o- village Suryagarha, Manikpur, P.O. + P.S.- Suryagarha, District- Lakhisarai. 5. Manoj Kumar Paswan, s/o- late Sham Sati Paswan, r/o- mohalla- Topkhana Bazar, Katghar, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Munger. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Deputy Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Munger. 4. The District Magistrate, Munger. 5. The Executive-cum-Special Officer, Nagar Parishad, Munger. .... .... Respondent/s ============================================= with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5104 of 2007 ============================================= Ramesh Kumar Mishra, s/o- Deoki Nandan Mishra, r/o- village Basgaraha, P.O.- Basudeopur, P.S.-Kotwali, District- Munger. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Deputy Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Munger. 4. The District Magistrate, Munger. 5. The Executive-cum-Special Officer, Nagar Parishad, Munger. .... .... Respondent/s ============================================= Appearance : (In CWJC No.16231 of 2007) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kr.Singh 2 For the Respondent/s : Mr. (SC15) Mr. Ambika Bhagat (In CWJC No.5104 of 2007) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kr.Singh 2 For the Respondent/s : Mr. (GP14) Mr. Ambika Bhagat ============================================= 2 3 18-10-2011 Both the matters pertain to Nagar Parishad, Munger and raise identical grievance which relates to non-payment of salary for the period April, 2004 to the date of filing of the writ petitions. Both the matters, therefore, have been clubbed and heard together and the present order shall govern them. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. Petitioners, in the both the applications, claim to be employees of the respondent Nagar Parishad. They raise a grievance that they were not paid due salary since April to the date of filing of the application. Separate counter affidavits in the both the writ petitions have been filed. Mr. Bhagat, learned counsel for the respondent Nagar Parishad states, with reference to averments made in paragraph No. 5 of the counter affidavit, that due salary was/were paid to the petitioner till February, 2010. In that view of the matter, the applications have become infructuous. Accordingly, the applications stand dismissed as having become infructuous. PANKAJ KUMAR/- (Kishore K. Mandal, J)