IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 1855 of 2005. Date of Decision: 27th March, 2009. Ram Saran Petitioner through Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate Versus Kamaljit Kaur & Anr. Respondents through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) This Revision Petition is directed against the orders dated 6.8.2002 and 30.5.2003 passed by the learned Civil Judge [Senior Division], and learned Additional District Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib whereby ad-interim injunction was granted against the petitioner and has been confirmed in appeal. The ad-interim injunction has been granted on an application moved by the respondents who are daughter-in-law and minor grand son of the petitioner. As may be seen, the interim injunction is operating from last more than six years. There is every likelihood that by now the main suit might have been decided. Be that as it may, since the injunction order is operating from last more than six years, there appears to be no need to go into the rival contentions of the parties. Rather, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the revision petition with a direction that the injunction as granted by the Courts below shall continue to operate till the civil suit is decided which, in turn, shall be disposed of by the learned trial Court within a period of six months, if still pending. Disposed of. March 27, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE