1 APPLN 5499 OF 2010 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5499 OF 2010. Dilshad Nissar Patel and anr .. Applicants -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. Raju Yamgar, for the Applicant. Mr. Anoop Pandey, for the complainant. Mr. Alpa T. Javeri, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 20th December, 2010 P.C. 1. This is an application by parents in law of a son in law, who committed suicide. The victim was married to applicants' daughter on 1st June, 2010 and till October, 2010, the couple resided with victim's parents and thereafter they started residing separately at Bombay. On 25th October, 2010 at 1.00 a.m, the applicants came to the house of victim's parents when they knew that the victim had some disturbance or quarrel in his family. at 2.00 a.m., the victim was seen weeping by the watchman. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the victim committed suicide at 3.00 a.m. There is big suicide note written to the family members blaming the mother in law for the state of affairs. The 2 APPLN 5499 OF 2010 learned APP as well as learned counsel for the complainant strongly opposed the application for granting anticipatory bail. Considering the nature of allegations made and the circumstances in which the victim has committed suicide, it is not clear as to what the Investigating Officer would seek by subjecting the applicants to custodial interrogation. In view of this, the application is allowed. Therefore, in the event of applicants' arrest in CR No. I 417 of 2010, registered at Turbhe Police Station, they be released on bail on their furnishing PR Bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000/-by each of them with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs. 50,000/- by each of them on the following conditions. i) The applicants shall make themselves available on 22.12.2010 at 10.00 a.m,. for interrogation by Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when required Investigating Officer. ii) The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. i) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the applicant 3 APPLN 5499 OF 2010 may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of Maharashtra and ors, in S.L.P No.7615 of 2009. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)