1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 295/2008 (Lekh Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 18/02/2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. G.R.Punia for the petitioner. Mr. Narendra Moolchandani Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and police investigation diary. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that two accused persons namely Brij Lal and Ashok Kumar have been granted bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this court and the case of the petitioner is identical to that of the co-accused. It is further contended that as a matter of fact accused Brij Lal, Pusaram and Harchand entered into an agreement to sale the land in favour of Ranveer Singh and ultimately the sale has been executed in favour of Ranveer Singh only. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Lekh Ram S/o Shri Brij Lal be released on bail in FIR No. 123/07 P.S. Ghumarwali, provided he 2 executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP