IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID MONDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2007 / 29TH SRAVANA 1929 R.P.No.104 of 1999 in O.P.No.1070 of 1999(B) -------------------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN O.P.NO.1070/1999 DATED 21/01/1999 .................... PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT IN O.P.:- ---------------------------------------------------------- THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNNAMKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SALIM.P.A. RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS & RESPONDENTS 2 TO 8 IN O.P.:- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AVARUTTY HAJI, S/O.KOYAKUTTY, MUSLIM VEEDU, KECHERY THRISSUR. 2. M.A.RASHEED, S/O.AVARUTTY HAJI, MUSLIM VEEDU, KECHERY THRISSUR. 3. PRASAD, S/O.LATE KUMARAN, PANKICKAPARAMBIL, KEECHERY, THRISSUR. 4. SHYJU, S/O.LATE KUMARAN, PANICKPARAMBIL, KEECHERY, THRISSUR. 5. ARAVINDAN, S/O.KONTRA VALAPPIL SIVARAMAN, PANICKAPARAMBIL, KEECHERY, THRISSUR. 6. KRISHNAN, S/O.KONTRA VALAPPIL SIVARAMAN, - DO- -DO- 7. RAMESH, S/O.KONTRA VALAPPIL CHANDRAPRASAD SUBRAN, -DO- 8. SUBASH, S/O.KOTRAVALAPPIL KUNJUMON, -DO- -DO- 9. JAYAN, S/O.KOTRAVALAPPIL KUNJUMON, -DO- -D0- R1 & R2 BY ADV.SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:- K.Balakrishnan Nair & Harun-Ul-Rashid, JJ. -------------------------------------------------------------- R.P.No.104 of 1999 in O.P.No.1070 of 1999-B -------------------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 20th day of August, 2007 ORDER Balakrishnan Nair,J. The writ petitioners approached this Court seeking police protection based on an interim order passed by the civil Court. The interim order was one of injunction against trespass. The Sub Inspector of Police later filed this Review Petition stating that it is impossible to identify the property scheduled in the plaint in respect of which interim injunction was granted. 2. Since the suit must have been finally disposed of long ago, the writ petition itself has become infructuous. Accordingly, we allow this Review Petition and recall the judgment of this Court dated 21st January, 1999. K.Balakrishnan Nair Judge Harun-Ul-Rashid Judge vku/-