IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42399 of 2007 1. RAVINDRA NATH GUPTA S/O LATE NARESH PRASAD GUPTA 2. URMILA DEVI WIFE OF LATE NARESH PRASAD GUPTA Sl. NO. 1 TO 2 R/O MOHALLA NAYA TOLA, KESHOPUR, JAMALPUR, P.S. JAMALPUR, DIST. MUNGER 3. JYOTI DEVI, W/O ANIL KUMAR GUPTA, R/O MOHALLA FULKA, P.S. JAMALPUR, DIST. MUNGER. --- PETITIONERS. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SULEKHA DEVI, W/O RAVINDRA NATH GUPTA D/O SRI SHANKAR PRASAD R/O ASHOK RAJ PATH, MAHENDRA, MOHALLA P.S. SULTANGANJ, DIST. PATNA. -- OPP.PARTIES. ----------- 07 17.08.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegations contained in the F.I.R. are absurd. It is next contended that it has been lodged after lodgment of the divorce case by the petitioner no.1 against his wife/opposite party no.2. He thus prays for quashing of entire criminal proceeding including F.I.R. I have perused the F.I.R. It discloses allegations against the accused persons. The submission that it has been lodged maliciously will be taken care of in course of investigation. This Court does not find any merit in this application. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)