AB 266/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE C.R.SARMA Heard Mr. A.M.Mazumdar, learned Sr. Counsel assisted by Mr. M.J.Quadir, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. B.S.Sinha, learned Addl.P,Assam. This is an application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail in favour of the petitioners namely, 1 Khayrul Haque Choudhury and 2. Nizam Uddin Choudhury @ B adal in connection with Hailakandi P.S. Case No. 504 of 2010 under Sections 498 (A)/34 IPC. Perused the Case Diary as produced by the learned Addl.P.P,Assam. The learned Sr. Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that there is scope of settlement and re-union between the husband and wife and that releasing the p etitioner particularly, the husband of the petitioner and his family member will facilitate the settlement. The accused/petitioners were granted interim bail vi de order dated 10.12.2010. According to the complainant the alleged occurrence took place on 02.02.2010 a nd complaint was filed before the learned C.J.M,Hailakandi on 22.11.2010. Considering the entire aspects of the matter, I am of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not warranted. Accordingly, the interim ord er dated 10.12.10. is hereby made absolute subject to conditions that the petit ioners shall make themselves available before the investigation Officer as and w hen required; and they shall not interfere with the investigation in any manner. This bail petition stands disposed of.