CR No. 3482 of 2008(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.3482 of 2008(O&M) Decided on :10-11-2008 Anil Kumar ....Petitioner VERSUS Madhu Rani and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present: Mr. R.S.Chahal, Advocate for the petitioner. MAHESH GROVER, J The appeal of the petitioner which was preferred by him in the year 2001 was dismissed in default in the year 2003. An application for restoration of the appeal has now been dismissed vide impugned order dated 15th September, 2007. A perusal of the impugned order shows that no cogent explanation has been given before the District Judge, Faridabad before whom the application for restoration was moved. The petitioner has pleaded that his brother was looking after the affairs of the case and he shifted to Himachal Pradesh. No particulars had been given. The application was therefore dismissed vide the impugned order. The present revision petition has been filed after almost one year thereafter. It is apparent that the petitioner has been negligent in prosecuting CR No. 3482 of 2008(O&M) 2 his case as even after the passing of the impugned order, revision petition has been filed belatedly. No ground to interfere. Dismissed. November 10, 2008 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge