IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.371 of 2007 USHA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5 18.8.2008 KHAN No one appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State is present. In the instant writ petition the petitioner prays for issuance of a direction to the police officers to investigate the Benipatti (Arer) P.S.Case No.30 of 2006 dated 21.2.2006 registered under sections 148, 448, 380, 341, 366 and 504 of the Penal Code properly and for a direction to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani to record the statement of Shailendra Singh, the husband of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State submits that supplementary charge sheet has already been submitted in the instant case and the case is being further investigated. In paragraph 14 of the counter affidavit it has been stated that the statement of Shailendra Singh has already been recorded. In this view of the matter, I find that the relief prayed for by the petitioner is substantially redressed and as such I do not find any reason to proceed with this writ petition any further. This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to take steps for conclusion of the investigation at the earliest. (S.P.Singh,J)