IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.513 of 2009 AJAY KUMAR SINGH …PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. BANTY KUMAR …OPP.PARTIES For the petitioner :Mr. Purnendu Nr. Singh For the State :Mr. Umesh Lal Verma,APP ----------- 02. 04.11.2010 Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioner being the informant, is the igniter of the criminal proceeding. He is aggrieved by order 13th January,2009, passed on Cr. Appeal No.7 of 2009 which was preferred by o.p.no.2 seeking release from remand home/jail custody on the ground that he has been declared juvenile by order dated 18.12.2008. Paragraph 7 of the appellate order reads as under: “7. From perusal of the record, it transpires that after disappearance of the victim girl on 24.11.08 F.I.R. was lodged on 9.12.08 against entire family of this appellant. In the F.I.R. only suspicion has been raised. More-over this appellant has been declared juvenile on 18.12.08. In such view of the matter the impugned order dated 24.12.08 is hereby quashed and it is ordered that the appellant Banty Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each by the near relative of the appellant and with further condition that they will keep strict watch over the appellant, so that he may not be exposed to any criminal associate.” The adjudication with regard to juvenility of o.p.no.2 by order dated 18.12.2008 is not under challenge. In that view of the matter consideration made by learned appellate court cannot 2 be said to be perverse and/or perfunctory. The application lack merit which is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )