IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36417 of 2008 AMARDIP YADAV son of Chandra Nand Yadav, resident of village- Koshakpur, P.S. Raniganj,District- Araria. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 8 25.5.09 Petitioner is in custody since 6.11.2007 in relation to Raniganj P.S.Case no. 11/07 instituted under Section 302 and other sections of Indian Penal Code read with Arms Act. Petitioner, in the FIR itself, has been named as direct assailant. In the FIR itself. FIR shows that the death of the deceased was at the spot. After throwing investigation the case against the petitioner has been found to be true and chargesheet has been submitted against him. In such a situation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. However, the trial may be expedited. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the order of this Court granting anticipatory bail to Susil Yadav and Sunil Yadav their cases are entirely different because upon investigation police submitted final form against them and have not sending them for trial though subsequently learned CJM has taken cognizance against them. This application is accordingly rejected. SINGH (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)