c ^A<c6^^ 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT: BILASPUR W.P.No. l9o°) OF 2004 PETITIONER : Ku. Saroj Singh, aged 53 years, daughter of late Shri Preetam Singh Birdi, resident of House No. EWS- 2 (Janta Quarter) Nehru Nagar Bilaspur, Tehsil & District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS !i!a!BlMi RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Forest Department, Raipur. ". rf'>^''^' M-^. ^.^: K " .ys^ .//-•^T' ^•^- ^ <?•<•" ,• <"^' <^ 2.The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Forest Development Corporation, Sector-5, Devendra Nagar,Raipur. S.Regional General Manager, Chhattisgarh State Forest Development Corporation, Sector-5, Devendra Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 4. Divisional Manager, Chhattisgarh State Forest Development Corporadon, Kota-Pandariya Project, Mangla Road, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 5. The Commissioner, OfEce of the Employees Provident Fund, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). L.-Z. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE^ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT nST THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION AND^FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITAVRITS, ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS The petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under: - 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER : - 1RHBB XI-HC-22 •^Sf ^|<<|cf<1, ®Ti1+l<IS,1«<W1^1< 3T1^[ •q^SR. [^f )^)DC) *(1*ICTI SbHICD 200 Iq^iT' sn^i'^1 r<-ii?t> sii^i sf)'Hict) 1yi?a ^ •'•..1-, sn^iTRiiw^fei laz? i/2004 Shri Somnafh Vcrma., Counsc Shri Sudhir Agfawal, Pauel La I.A.No. 4470/2004 for zu-Rent L^wyer for the State, Iheamia ia e-Uowed. tilie aiittiotnn It is submitted tbat the pe) Fbrother who died while serviag ia ^he dues have not been peud to IpetiUouer Stil.'iiu.ts tlial for tlie prcss) pf stie 1s givcn ^il opportuiiity of ipj ^ifi-esh before the coinpetent lsti.aU be considered on its own merit^ Haviag considered and witlioil ^ueiits of llie case, iu llic opiuiou o pe servCd if a direction is given to tpa ^-epreseutation raisiag her grievance^ t>f the x-espondents alone with a coply tvifhin. 15 davs. an.d on such il 'oiupcleiit autliorily of ftie respoud' |jwn ments iu accordaace witli law ivithia nvo inontlis B-oia the date of ts inade clear that tf aav erievance b.vail thc rcincdv availablc. iindcr thc Witli the afoi^said oL'seivatioU jjf. Consequently M.W.P.No.1710/2^ .i*i'!<f<-i41-f 'qi*rai '3 fezt Tfw^R: ^sriigiian^i for ffac. nctitioncr. titioner is the nominee of her office ofrespondent No.4 aiid Iher, L-eamed coiuisel for the ul cuds orjusU.ee "-i11 be sen'cd IMng ttie detailed rcpresentation ipty of rhe respondeuts, wliich ia accordance with law. |.t expi^ssing a-ny opioion on the if. ftiis Coi-ii't, euds ofjustj.cc wiil S[he petitioner to make a detafled $ betore trie competent autnonty of the petition and this order, jcprcscntation bcing filcd, thc- luts shall decidc tlie saiac 011 its as early as possiblc preferably receipt of the representation, it ^till reuiaitis, the petitioner inay lla\v. s, this pctiliou slaiids 'lisposed p04 also stands disBose'a of, Sd/- 7 ,^p~ j^ e '<