IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYAN AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.682 of 1992 Date of decision: February 7,2007 Raja Ram V. Amar Nath and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL Present: Ms.Alka Sarin,Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri Raman Mahendera,Advocate, for the respondents. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, states that since the premises in question had already been vacated by the tenant-petitioner, therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. February 7,2007 ( Viney Mittal ) sks Judge