1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Criminal Revision Application No. 418 of 2006 Shri Piyush Mafatlal Bhansali Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & anr. Respondents Mr.Sandeep Karnik i/b Mr.A.H.H. Ponda for applicant. Mr.U.V.Nikam, APP for State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. January 22, 2007. P.C. . Heard. The impugned order has been passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class Uran on 1/8/2006 thereby rejecting the application at Exhibit 52 in Regular Criminal Case No.183 of 2005. By the said application the applicant - original accused no.9 had prayed for being discharged. . The said order can be challenged by filing a revision application before the Sessions Court concerned under Section 399 of Cr.P.C. and, therefore, the application is disposed with liberty to approach the concerned Sessions Court. . The interim protection granted by this Court shall continue for a further period of two weeks so as to enable the applicant to approach the Sessions 2 Court and it is made clear that continuation of such interim order shall be considered by the learned Sessions Judge on its own merits and without being influenced by the protection granted by this Court. (B.H