1 19 cao.182.10 n rpwst.22623.10 ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 182 OF 2010 IN REVIEW PETITION (stamp) NO. 22623 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10219 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. A.R.S.Baxi for the Applicant. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 08 th August, 2011. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant. 2 Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Delay is condoned. Application is allowed. [ A.S.OKA, J ] 2 19 cao.182.10 n rpwst.22623.10 ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (stamp) NO. 22623 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10219 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. A.R.S.Baxi for the Review Petitioner. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 08 th August, 2011. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. 2 Perused the order dated 3 rd March, 2010 passed in the writ petition. Even as of today, the Petitioner has not deposited a sum of Rs.3,70,000/-. Therefore, there is no error apparent on the face of the record. There is no ground for review. 3 The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner relies upon clause (2) of the compromise purshis filed in the Executing Court. 3 19 cao.182.10 n rpwst.22623.10 4 It is for the Petitioner to make an appropriate application to the concerned Court in that behalf. Subject to what is observed above, the review petition is rejected. [ A.S.OKA, J ]