.5?' ULE oca^ ^•,^z'5?^ c'f'\'"/ d«ted......a^.^-^------- 4 Hi THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUiaECHHATriSGARH AT BttASPUR W.P.NO.^2^/ 2006 ^titioner [1] Vishwajeet Chakravorty S/o -Late Shri Narayan Chandra Chakravorty Aged- about 35 year, R/o -Domapal, Tah.- Konta Dist.- Dantewada (C.G.) Versus Respondents y 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through, the Secretary Forest Department,D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The State of Madhya Pradesh , Through, the Secretaiy Forest Departaaent, Valabha Bhavan. Bhopal (M.P.) /3. The Union of India, The Chief Secretaiy Human Resorses. Department, New Delhi /4.The Principle, Chief Forest Conservator, Forest Department Jail Road Raipur 5. Forest Conservator Forest ^ Department. 'Circil - Domapal' ^. (Producation), Dornapal Dist- ^ ^ Danetawada (C.G.) 6. The Concotor Danetawada, Dist- Danetawada (C.G.) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227LQF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITE IN NATURE OF AMUS. CERTIORARI PROHABrTATON. etc. AND / OR FOR ORDER AND / OR DIECTIONT / DIRECTIONS IN NATURE OF WmT. 5 B'!1 '^lst5!S3KS^I^Si»SBIS^Mi®I%®s%SS^^ "^'SaSKSsSfiliSffi8Si%SS9HS:^^ sW£3®B^.|^gS%%ss^g.gs^sa^ ;;':^ ^l'^':^.;^7;;:"?S^% ^^^ •an^r^T l<-fi°b 311^1 st)^i<*i ^tfe^ Gowri -A;'';,-w HWWl thwich .3t^/?i!5[^^^.^^l;^Y: .!-iy^:/:-K2'^:c"o. : """""""'WI. 200 •^^r--------•••••" •s^ sn^i ¥RIRIT'Hfef 2-2-2006 Shri Vijay Deshmukh, counsel Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Dy.t Chhattisgarh. . Shri S.K. Beriwal, Sr; Panel Lsjwyer for the Union 6f India. respond^nts Heard. . • Learned counsel for the petiti compassipnate appointment. He petitioner died on 1 -4-1 996. Leamec) be given an opportunity of filing U competent authority of the own merits in accordance with law. Notopposed. Having considered and witt)< merits of the case, in the opinion s&rved ifa direction is given to| representation raising his grievance^ respondents alongwith a copy of thi one month from today, and on oompetent authority of the merits in accordance with law as period ofthree monthsfrom the date| With the aforesaid observatioihs Certiffed copyas per rutes. iitiner submits that the matter relates to fuHher submits that the father of the counsel prays thatthe petitioner may |e detajled representation before the ;, which shall be considered oh its respond^nts ^Nl<yi*flTi :qm^ff '^.fs^ <^iWi<' i? aipgii SBt^i for the petitioner. Sovt. Advocate for the Stete bf |out expressi.ng any opinion on the 'pi this Court, ends of justice wiii be the petitioner to make a detailed before the competent authority of the petition and this orderwithin a period >uch representation being fiied, the shail decide the same on its own iarly as possibte preferably within a of receipt 6f the representation. is, this petition s^nds disposed of. Sd.'- Fakhruddin Judge 11 "\ •' ^ . 'I -^f^T ^'