1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6006 OF 2009 Vijaykumar Rajaram Salunkhe ..Petitioner V/s. Maharashtra Public Service Commission ..Respondent Mr.K.S.Patil, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr.Vinay Masurkar, Government Pleader and Mr.V.P.Malvankar, Assistant Government Pleader, for the respondent CORAM : S.B.MHASE & R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATE : 12TH AUGUST, 2009 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has secured 82 marks and he was declared as successful in the examination by the Maharashtra Public Service Commission ( Hereinafter referred to as MPSC ). However, he was not called for interview. The Cut off marks 2 were fixed by the MPSC in view of the Rule No.9 of the MPSC Rules, 1981. The cut off marks fixed were 84 marks for being called for viva-voce. Since the petitioner's marks were below the cut off marks he was not called for viva-voce. We do not find anything arbitrary or unreasonable in this decision of the MPSC. The learned counsel for the petitioner now states that the petitioner secured 87 marks. This according to him is on the basis of the Second Sheet and the answer key supplied to him. We do not propose to enter into this aspect, as Rule 5.7 of the MPSC prohibits any verification/reassessment. The petitioner has therefore no right to claim such reassessment. We, therefore, do not find any merit in the Petition which is accordingly dismissed. ( R.M.SAVANT, J.) ( S.B.MHASE, J. )