IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.6372 of 2010 JAIMANGAL SINGH s/o Sri Ram Locchan Singh Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5/ 28.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner was refused bail earlier by order dated 30.12.2007 and 13.8.2009 vide Cr. Misc. No. 40611 of 2007 and 29569 of 2009 respectively. Now, the petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail on the ground that there is no sufficient progress in the trial upon which a report was called for from the trial court to assess the situation. The trial court has reported that the trial was delayed because case diary was not available, but now case diary, which was tagged in the Cr. Appeal pending before this court, has been received by the court below and three witnesses have already been examined. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner also because co-accused has been convicted by the trial court. Prayer for bail is rejected with direction to the court below to keep the progress of the trial in-tact so that there may not be unnecessary delay in disposal of the same. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)