IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3288 of 2005 KHUBLAL MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 13 26.9.2008. Supplementary show cause has been filed on behalf of opposite party no.5 the Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Muzaffarpur. In the supplementary show cause it has been stated that the name of the petitioner was sent for consideration before the three men committed headed by the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur for consideration in the light of the government circular dated 16.3.2006. Name was sent for regularization of the petitioner and other similarly situated employees. The aforesaid committee considered and recommended for regulation of daily wages employees on 11.3.2008 and list was sent for consideration before the Divisional Commissioner and after roster clearance the petitioner has been regularized by order dated 12.8.2008 issued from the office of the Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, opposite party no.5. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the letter of regularization issued in favour of the petitioner shows that he has not been given the benefit of past experience and his services are purely temporary. In case the similarly situated employees have also been regularized and they have been given benefit of their past experience it is expected that the similar benefit will be allowed to the petitioner also. As the direction of this court has already been complied, the proceeding of contempt is dropped. Sss/- (Mridula Mishra, J)