AB 2018/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. SARMA Heard Mr. M.H. Rajbarbhuiya, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Munir, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. By this application filed u/s 438 CrPC, the petitioner Sri Kripa Sindhu Nath has prayed for releasing him on pre-arrest bail in connection with Borkhola P.S. Ca se No. 57/2011(GR Case No. 1411/2011) under Sections 420/493/376 IPC. The allegation made against the petitioner is that the petitioner developed love affairs with the informant and he used to have sexual intercourse with her with the promise to marry the informant. In her statement under Section 164 CrPC, th e informant stated that on 30.4.11 at about 10 A.M. when the petitioner was comm itting sexual intercourse her mother saw the occurrence. It has also been allege d that the petitioner assured to marry the informant and accordingly applied ver milion on her. She further alleged that when the petitioner was moving with her in an auto-rickshaw, on the same evening at about 9 P.M. he jumped from the auto -rickshaw and fled away. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner, who is a Central Govt. employee in the SSB Deptt., is a married person and that he has been falsely implicated by the informant in this case. Considering entire aspect of the matter, more particularly, the statement made u/s 164 CrPC, I am of the opinion that the release of the petitio ner on bail will not adversely affect the investigation. Therefore, custodial in terrogation of the petitioner is not necessary. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner in connecti on with the above mentioned P.S. Case, the arresting authority shall release him on bail of ‘25,000/- with one surety of like amount to th e satisfaction of the arresting authority subject to the condition that the peti tioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer within 7(seven) days from t his date for the purpose of investigation and interrogation and on such other da tes as and when so required by the Investigating Officer. It is further directed that the petitioner shall not interfere in the investigation and shall not inti midate any of the witnesses connected with this case. With the above directions, this bail application is disposed of. Return the case diary.