HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.9518 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 20.07.2011 **** Deepinder Singh . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Gursimran Singh; and Mr. Saurabh Garg, Advocates for the petitioner(s) Ms. Charu Tuli, Sr. DAG Punjab ***** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) (1). This order shall dispose of CWP No.9518, 11584 & 11637 of 2011 as common issues are involved. The petitioners seek a direction to the respondents for determination of their eligibility for appointment to the post of Physical Education Instructor in the light of the Full Bench decision dated 27.07.2010 of this Court rendered in CWP No.451 of 2008 (Manjit Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors.). CWP No.9518 of 2011.doc - 2 – (2). Having heard learned counsel for the parties, there can indeed be no dispute that the petition as regards eligibility has been answered in favour of the petitioner by the Full Bench in Manjit Singh’s case (supra). (3). Learned State counsel states that there are some cases where the candidates/petitioner(s) did not even apply and have now approached the Court seeking determination of their eligibility/merit as per the Full Bench decision. In my considered view, the eligibility/merit of only those candidates is required to be determined who applied before the cut off date along with the relevant and requisite documents. (4). The writ petition(s) is/are accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondents to do the needful within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order subject to the condition imposed above. (5). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 20.07.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge