1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 134 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 47 OF 2011 (Surendra Fakira Zire vs. State of Maharashtra) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri Shriniwas Deshpande, Advocate (appointed) for the applicant. Shri D.B. Yengal, APP for the respondent. ….. CORAM : MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. APRIL 20, 2011. Heard Shri Deshpande, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Yengal, learned counsel for the respondent. The prosecution case is that the applicant kidnapped a minor child Mayur and thereafter committed his murder. The case is based on circumstantial evidence. The circumstances against the applicant are he was last seen with the child, conduct of the applicant, discovery of blood stained clothes at his instance. The prosecution case is mainly based on the evidence of P.W. 5 – Chandrakala, P.W. 2 – Fakira, P.W. 4 – Ashwini and P.W. 7 – Mangala who have stated that the applicant was last seen with the deceased Mayur on 2 15.05.2008 and thereafter Mayur was not seen alive. Looking to the evidence on record, we do not find it a fit case to grant bail to the applicant. Application is rejected. Office to prepare paper book expeditiously and as soon as the paper book is ready, list the matter on final hearing board. The advocate appointed for the petitioner be paid fees as per rules. Office to communicate this order to the petitioner, who is in Jail. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.