IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43105 of 2008 MADAN MAHTO @ MADAN MOHAN MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 27/11/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. The petitioner is named accused of a case which has been registered under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms act. The informant’s cousin Sikander Kumar Mahto was sleeping besides the informant. At about 1 A.M. in the night the informant heard sound of firing and saw his cousin Sikander Mahto injured and saw that Hare Ram Mahto, Mantu Mahto, Dilip Kumar and Vidya Nand Mahto who were having arms in their hand. They uttered that the blood has been revenged. Later on the informant saw this petitioner including Rameshwar Mahto and Shiv Mahto were also standing at some distance. Submission is that even according to the FIR, the petitioner is not armed with any fire arms. Co-accused Vidyanand Mahto and Mantun Mahto have been admitted to bail by this court vide order dated 14.1.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 57599 of 2007 and Cr. Misc. No. 1238 of 2008. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Madan Mahto @ Madan Mohan Mahto is directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction - 2 - of the C.J.M., Begusarai in connection with Nowkothi P.S. Case No. 36 of 2005. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)