IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12157 of 2007 Lala Ram Kumar Prasad, S/o Late Abadh Bihari Prasad, Resident of Village – Jaffarpur, P.O. + P.S. –Belsand, District – Sitamarhi. At present – Ramal Gas Agency Road Rajopatti, P.S. – Sitamarhi, District – Sitamarhi. ---------- Petitioner Versus 1. The Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Bailey Road, Patna. 2. The Director of Accounts, Electricity Board, Bailey Road, Patna. 3. The Deputy Accounts Director, Tirhut Electric Supply Area, Muzaffarpur. 4. The Deputy Personnel Director, Tirhut Electricity Supply Area , Muzaffarpur. 5. The Financial Controller – 1, Electricity Board, Bailey Road, Patna. 6. The General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Electricity Area Board, Muzaffarpur. 7. The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Electric Supply Circle, Muzaffarpur. 8. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Sitamarhi. --------- Respondents 3 15.07.2011 Heard Sri Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vijay Kumar Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the respondents/Bihar State Electricity Board. The present writ petition was filed in the year 2007 with a prayer to direct the respondents to make payment of all the retrial dues. Despite the fact that case was filed in the year 2007 till date no counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents/Board. However, on instruction learned counsel for the Board submits that during the pendency of the writ petition all the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the moment is not in a position to dispute the statement. In view of statement made on behalf of respondents/Bihar State Electricity Board the court is of the opinion that the present writ petition can be disposed of. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. However, it is 2 made clear that if still any grievance exists the petitioner shall be entitled to approach the authority concerned i.e. respondent no. 6/General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Electricity Area Board, Muzaffapur. If such representation is filed respondent no. 6 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law and if he considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine he is required to pass order for payment. The respondent no. 6 is required to take final decision/make payment within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction the writ petition stands disposed of. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)