:C-22 -g-aET r^i<4ld<4, ^-al^^Ko, i^<ni^ill< Sff^T ^^K _...^.£.-...^..-..YM.2^ /°5~- "WI, 200 HWW 9b^l<=b •^^T' ^T^T^T f<rlJch 5h+il<^ <11^0 371^T ^<TTW ^Tf^f PETITIONER Balkrishlna ShiH S/o Master, Developsfnent (CG) SIiarma, aged about 58 years, Laxmi Prasad, Occupation Head |Aadim Jati Middle School, Reevapar Block Kartala, Distt. Korba Versus 1. Statel Aadusti Mantoj-alaya, 2. Statel (Aadi]|n 3. Blockl Blockl, 4. Comitiission Jatit 5< Preml Adiml SB: HON. SKRi DHIRENDRA 6-12-2008 None appears for fhe pe|dtioner, Shri Arun Sao, Govt, Ad|v. This petition is directed| 2005 (Annexure P-5) whereb^ the Middle School Reevapai| School, Chorbhatti for teachic|g CM^F<n41i Trp:Rrf'? fec?ir <p2i<^i< ^^f^R^n^T |of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Jati and Anusuchit Jati Vikas D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) of Chhatdsgarh, tihrough. Collector Jati Vikas) Korba (CG) Education Officer Developnient Kartala, Distt. Korba (CG) lissioner, Adim Jati and Anusuchit ikas, Raipur (CG) Lal Devangan, further Head Master, Jati Middle School, Reevapar, Block Kartala, Distt Korba Dcvcljopmcnt (CG) WMT PBTITION UNDBft ARTlCLB 226 aad 22T OP THB CONSTIfUTION OF INDIA MiSKRA. J |v., forthe State. agaiiist the order oftransfer dated 2-4- fhe petitioner, who is head niaster ia has been posted at Naveen Middte g purpose, [Tft^ ^fo^ < /^y ^ XI-KC-22 1 I \ %^/ STT^T'^T f^-liph 3T1;§^T ?t)^i<=ti ^rfiTT ^^ ^i^icn^ , ^WTS, fa<ni<iy HW^\{ $b^ich BTri^r 'q^ra? ...^..$.:...^.:.^1^- 'tSRi^ST' ^TT^T ^^T^R:'H^T tbe Learaed counsei for stay order dated 4-5-2005 ofAanexure P-5 has not beei|i Learaed counsel for order, fhe iaipugned order has beconie redundaat aad fhese ctrcuBistaiices, they wim fhe libertv to fhe State of traosfer/posting of fhe exigency, In view of fhe above State, the iB.stant petition is P-5 is set aside. However, appropriate order in the niatter oftransfer oftlie petit|loner, <=hl<Llf<n<i1r1 '^TTR'^f ^ fec3t <psi^l< ^ 3?rf^R 3:n^r petitioner subinite that by virtue of p^ssed by this Court, fhe mipugned order given efiect to tiU date, fh|e State subiaits that iii view offhe stay h^s not been given effect to and fhe saaie 1 iiieaiiiagless witli fhe lapse of tmie. In h^ve no objection if the petition is allowed ILO pass appropriate orders ia the matter pletitioner in the event of admiaistrative Isubxaission of leamed counsel for fhe ^llowed aad impugned order ofAnnexure the State shaU be at liberty to pass e^ent of administrative exigency m fhe Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge *