..-•'.">^.A- ^^^' •w^^ ^: P...1 ..--•"tif^£\^' ^^y^' ^- ^ i ^2 .<t<'* IN THE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGASH AT BILASPVR W.P. (s) No. ....M.62;.....^2<M^ PETITIONER : -^ilaiiharan lal Pithaura S/o Shri Baldu Ram Pithaura aged about 44 years, Head Master Govt. Primaiy Narethitola, Block Churia Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS: l^ State of Chhattisgarh Throujgh Secretary Department of Education Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur .-.^ <C-G-) <-;^)^"~'\^ ' 2^. District Education Officer, Chhuria, ^ \ .< ^^ DistrictRajnandgaon<C.G.) 0-" ^- • 3^ Block Education Officer BIock- Chhuria District-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) _^' WMT PETITION U/A 226/277 OF THE CONSTmJTION OF INDIA FOR ISSIIANCE OF WMTS IN THE NATUSE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORAM AND FOROTHER SUITABLE WRITSAND DERECTIONS The above named petitioner most humbly aad respectfully begs fo submit as under:- y^y^QUBLQF CHUATI3S6ARH AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. wprr pFrmoN (s.) NO. 464 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus Hemrai Kumbhkar State of Chhattisgarh ond o'thers WRIT PETmtON t5.) N0. 465 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus Siddharth Choure State of Chhattisgarh ond others WRTT PETTTION fS.l N0. 466 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents verais Pwich Ram 5ahu State of Chhattisgarh ond o-thers WRTT PETmON IS.) N0. 467 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents verais Manharan Lol Prthaura State of Chhattisgarh ond o'thers WftrTPETTTION CS.) N0. 468 OF Z007 Petitioner ResBondents versus Yaggaya Datta Baghel State of Chhatt-isgarh ond o-thers WRTT TION (S.l N0. 469 OF 2QQ? Petitioner Respondents versus Shih Khoperckiy State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PETmON (5.1 N0. 470 OF 2007 /^ Petjtioner Resoondents wrsys Rcdhey Kishun Patel State of Chhatt-isgarh fsnd others WRIT PETmON (S.) N0. 471 OF 2007 Petitjoner Resoondents vierais AAonganLal State of Chhatl'isgarh ond olhers WRTT PETiriON tS.) N0. 472 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents verais Dhal Singh Sonwoni State of Chhattisyrh and o-thers WRIT PETmON (5.^ N0. 473 OF 2007 Petitioner ; Onkar Lal Sonboir versus Respondents : Storte of Chhattisgarh ond olhers WRTT PETCTION (S.) N0. 474 OF 2007 PetH'ioner : Shiv Kuinar 5harma versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarti and o-thers WRTT PETmON fS.l N0. 475 OF 20S7 Petitioner : Rajendra Kumar Sogar versus Respondents : State of ChhaUisgarh and o-thers WRIT PETTTION (5.1 N0. 476 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus AAakhanlal Thakur State of Chhatl-isgarh and others WRIT PETTTION fS.lNO. 477 OF 2007 rs^:: ^. Petitioner Respondents yerais Fool Chand Kamleshwar State of Chhattisgarh and o-thers Petittoner WRTT PETmON (S.^ N0. 478 OF 2007 Rajendra Kumar &ewan9an versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others And WRIT PETTTION (5.1 N0. 479 OF 2007 Petittoner Resoondents yersys Joyont Kumar Shendey State of Chhat^isgarh ond others 1. Present : Mr. R.fC Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sushil Dubey, ©owmment Advocate for the State/respondents. OR&ER (passed on 24th Day of January. 2007) Leamed counsel appearin9 for -the petitioners as well as leamed Govemment Advocate appearin9 for the Stute/respondents jointly submit -that Ihe facis and question of hsH involved in the present batch of writ petitions are squarely covered by -the decision of this Court in the case of Yo^wwnt Kw»w Bhwwdwttf vs. Munle^al CoiymwHon, th»ywid anffrtwi^. 2. In subsequent cases. i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (jSopesh Kuinw Vwwavs. Thf Stats 6o»t. of Chhattisgwh and WMthw^ ond other cormected nwrMers, decided by •this /"^' 3' Court on 15-12-2006, puraiant to -the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by •the Secrelary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal ond the prospeclus of Diploma in Education Examination. it was cfarified thot -the nomenclature of the Basic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been chonged ond renamed as Diploma in Educotion, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Cert-ificate hotders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 {.Gaipesh Kumar Vermavs. The State Sovt. of Chhattisgarh aidcrwihei) (Supra). 3. For •the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of -this Court in the matter of Ycahwcnt l&imar aiwdwaj\Suyr<i}. subject to verification of the fact' as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.T.I./tS.Ed. Gert'ificates at their own expenses as per the circulars chted 24-12-1998 ond l-3-1999 ond further whelher •they have been paid •hw advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of -this order be ptaced on -the record of -the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006C[I)MPJR-C696 Thakur