IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.14073 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : MAY 10, 2011 MANJIT SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER (COOPERATION), PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. HS Batth, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Addl.AG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 Legal representatives of respondent No.4 need not be impleaded, as the case relates to appointment of Lambardar. 2 Impugned order dated 19.3.2010 (Annexure P-6) has been passed by Financial Commissioner, Cooperation, Punjab, on the premise that respondent No.4-Satnam Singh had not been heard. In such circumstances, the case has been relegated to District Collector, Jalandhar, for giving an opportunity of hearing to respondent No.4 also, before deciding the issue of appointment of Lambardar for Village Dallewal, Tehsil Phillaur, District Jalandhar. 3 In view of death of respondent No.4, the issue of giving hearing to respondent No.4 does not arise. 4 Considering the subsequent development, the case is Civil Writ Petition No.14073 of 2010 2 remitted to the Financial Commissioner to enable him to reconsider the issue and see whether the petitioner can be appointed as Lambardar, as has been done by the District Collector and Commissioner. 5 The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. May 10, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?