IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30617 of 2009 DHARMENDRA KUMAR @ DHARU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.09.2009 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a Police case under Sections 379 of the Penal Code. It is submitted that the allegations are for theft of a parked motorcycle and he is in custody since 11.5.2009. Counsel for the State points out from the impugned order noticing from Para 58 of the case diary that the petitioner was habitual in dealing with stolen motorcycle and even preparing forged documents. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Rohtas at Sasaram in Sasaram PS Case No. 766 of 2008. Both the sureties of the petitioner should be his father and mother respectively and their photographs and proof of residence must be appended to the bail bonds. The sureties shall be required to file an affidavit of undertaking for appearance of the petitioner on the dates fixed in accordance with law. In the event of default by the petitioner, quite apart from proceeding against him appropriately, the court below shall proceed appropriately against the sureties also. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)