IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 10978 of 2008. Decided on: 14.06.2011. _________________________________________________ Ravinder Singh. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Surender Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. P. P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). According to learned counsel for the parties, the present lis is squarely covered by the decision dated 25.09.2009 rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.2216 of 2007, titled Babu Ram & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. & Another. 2. According to the learned counsel, the facts are identical, hence directions issued in Babu Ram’s case (supra) shall mutatis mutandis apply in the facts of the present case. The respondents are directed to take action in accordance with law, 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - within a period of 12 weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. 3. With the above observations/directions, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. June 14, 2011. (sck).