i •^ c &0( IN THE HIGH COURT QF JUDZCATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. "2,33-3 /2003 f' PETITIONER Rajballabh Singh S/o Late Dashrath Slngh^ Aged about 75 years^ 8/o Gali No»5 Deepak Nagar^ Durg^ District Durg (CG) • VERSUS RESPONDENTS ./••:^%- ^y^ ^^•'.^.^ 8 1) The Divisional Railway Manager, S»E»Railway, Bilaspur Division,Bilaspur» 2) The Divisional Coinmercial Manager, S.E.Railway, Bilaspur Division,Bilaspur, 3) The Superintendent of P@lice^ Durg, District Durg (CG) • ^* WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/2^7 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ....l.—- .^.;-;1,...'.E ^5»a-i H IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.2933 OF2003 Petitioner Rajballabh Singh Versus Respondents The Divisional Railway & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon*ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Anand Dadariya with Shri Kunal Das, Advocates for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate forthe State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 25th day of September, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner pteads no jnstruction. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2. In view of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok