asftl S 8- c ^ <^ - ! ;-• IN THE HQN'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR fC.G.1 ^l^, WRIT PETITION ( S. •). No. /2008 PETITIONERS tfes^ .r''-^~''\ V^-y (<'?°,^L>'' ^•""^ ^ ^- •y^^-' RESPONDENT •^ ilKf Oe<^>is^"" /1.1 Alok Kumar Sharma, Son of Shri Satanand Sharma, aged about 45 year, R/o. Qtr.No.A- 309, Samta Colony, Opposite WaterTank Raipur (C.G.) /2. Dr. K. Venkat Rao S/o. Kameshwa Rao,aged about41 years, R/o. Qtr. No. 14-B, Street-20, Sector-2, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS ^l /3, / State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. BHawah, Raipur (C.G.) Chhattisgarh Public Sei-vice Commission, Through : Its Secretary, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) The Examination Controller, Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Shankar Nagar Raipur (C.G.) The Upper Chhattisgarh, Public Commission, Shahkar Raipur (C.G.) Secretary Service Nagar, OL, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA J1 •'St HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 5415 of 2008 Petitioners Alok Kiunar Sharma & anofher Versus Respondents State of Chhatdsgarh & ofhers (Writ Petition under Ardcle226 ofthe Constitution of IndJa) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotri J.) Shri Viueet Paadey, Advocate for fhe petitioners. Shri P. K. Bhaduri, Pauel Lawyer for the respondent No. 1/State. Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate for the respondents No.2, 3 & 4. ORDBRtorall ( Passedon this llih day ofMarch, 2010) 1. 2. 3. Tliafcur ^. Heard. Leanied counsel appeariiig for ffae petitioaeis, on instructions, submits fhat the issue iavolved ia fhis Writ petition has already been settled. Thus, nothing survives in this petition. for adjudication. Leamed counsel appearimg for fhe respondents have no objection. Accordiagly, the writ petition is dismissed as Iiaviag becoaie infi-uctuous. No order asto costs. 'l SatishK. Agnihotri Judge