1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 50/2008 IN APPEAL AGAINST ORDER NO. 78/2008 (Smt. Usha Deorao Chopade & ors. Vs. Sanjeev Keshav Deo) AND WRIT PETITION NO. 2452/2008 (M/s Viraj Constructions Vs. Smt. Usha Deorao Chopade & ors. ) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. Mr. M.G. Bhangde, Sr. Counsel, with Mr. Upadhaya, Adv. for petitioners in contempt petition & respondents in W.P. Mr. Anand Jaiswal along with Mr. C.A. Lokhande, Advs. for respondent in contempt petition and petitioner in W.P. CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATED : 3 rd APRIL, 2009. In the interest of justice and in view of the fact that the parties are agreeable to settle their disputes pending between them, it is necessary to drop the contempt proceedings initiated against the respondents and accept the pursis which is signed by the respondent as also the counsel for the petitioner and the respondents, on record. The pursis is accepted on record and marked as Exh. “Z”. I have perused the contents of the pursis. They are in the nature of an undertaking and a compromise between the parties to settle the matter between them, specially which is also involved in Writ Petition No. 2452/2008. 2 From a perusal of the contents of the pursis, it is clear that the terms mentioned in the pursis are not unreasonable. Shri Bhangde, the learned Senior Counsel along with Shri Upadhyay is present on behalf of the petitioners and he makes a statement that the terms of the pursis are agreeable to the petitioners in Contempt Petition No. 50/2008. Shri Anand Jaiswal, the learned counsel for the respondent is also present in the Court. So also the respondent is personally present in the Court today. On making enquiries from the respondent to the Contempt Petition No. 50/2008, it is made clear by him that he would clearly abide by the terms mentioned in the pursis and both the matters could be disposed of in view of the undertaking given in paragraphs 1 to 4 of the pursis. In the peculiar facts and circumstances and since the parties have settled their dispute fully and finally by the pursis at Exh. “Z”, it is necessary to drop the contempt proceedings against the respondent and they are hereby dropped. The Contempt Petition No. 50/2008 and the Writ Petition No. 2452/2008 are disposed of in terms of the pursis. Order accordingly. No orders as to costs. JUDGE RMP