IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2007 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 WP(C).No. 35733 of 2007(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- VELAYUDHAN, AGED 78,S/O. KADUTHA THAMANACHALLIL, NJALAKAM KARA, THRIKKAKKARA NORTH VILLAGE KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY SRI.E.M.MURUGAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY CHEIF SECRETARY MINISTRY OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF RE-SURVEY OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF RE-SURVEY KAKKANADU. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THRIKKAKKARA NORTH VILLAGE THRIKKAKKARA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 35733 OF 2007 D ===================== Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2007 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that 2 cents of property belonging to him was set apart as pathway for the benefit of his assignees. It is stated that subsequently a resurvey was conducted and that the resurvey plan and records indicated that 2 cents form part of public pathway. It is seeking correction of this mistake, petitioner has submitted Ext.P2 representation before the 2nd respondent. The prayer made in this writ petition is for an expeditious consideration of the representation so made by the petitioner. 2. Having regard to the facts of the case as stated above, I see no justification to deny the request made by the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, I dispose of this writ petition directing that the 2nd respondent shall take up and consider Ext.P2, and pass orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp