1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 48/2010 IN WRIT PETITIONNO. 3323/1997 RAJENDRA RAMAJI BELEKAR AND OTHERS ..vs .. CHANDRAKANT SHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ANOTHER =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- None for the petitioner. C ORAM : Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota,J. DATED : 10th MARCH, 2010. None for the petitioner. Hence, dismissed for want of prosecution. JUDGE. Later on Mr. V.S.Kukday, learned counsel for the petitioner makes an oral application for restoration of the contempt petition, which is dismissed for default. Contempt Petition is restored. After the matter is partly heard, the learned counsel for the petitioner concedes that he is 2 required to proceed for execution of the decision of the School Tribunal instead of preferring the contempt petition. On his application, the contempt petition is allowed to be withdrawn. The petitioner is at liberty to proceed for execution of the order of the School Tribunal. JUDGE. Rvjalit