IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.21687 of 2008 1. DEVENDRA MAHURI son of Kanhaiya Mahuri, 2. Lal Mohan Goswami son of Bachchu Goswami, 3. Jagnarain Sao son of Janki Sao, 4. Suresh Goswami son of Janki Sao, 5. Baldeo Mohan son of Hari Mahto, 6. Kishori Mahuri son of Thakur Mahuri, 7. Nanhak Sao @ Nandan son of Jamki Sao, 8. Ram Prasad Sao son of Janki Sao, 9. Mohan Teli @ Mohan Gupta son of Lakhi Gupta, & 10. Munarik Mochi son of Haklu Mochi, All resident of village- Bisunganj, P.S.-Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad …Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & 2. Brijnandan Mistri, son of Ratan Mistri, resident of village- Bisunganj, P.S.-Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad …Opposite Parties ----------- 5/ 22.04.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners have sought quashing of the order dated 24.04.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Fast Track Court No. 2, Jehanabd, in Sessions Trial No.69 of 2006, by which an application under section 227 Cr. P.C. was disallowed. It has been submitted that the petitioners were named in the First Information Report and subsequently charge sheet was submitted against them. Upon the charge sheet cognizance was also taken. However, subsequently the CID filed an application before the Court for further investigation and submitted final report, but in the meanwhile since cognizance had already been taken the court did not pass any positive order in favour of the petitioners. The petitioners have prayed for quashing the order of the trial court on the ground that it should have considered the entire material and by not considering the CID report it has committed illegality. 2 It has been repeatedly held by this Court as well as Hon’ble Supreme Court that at the stage of framing of charge no express order detailing the case of the accused has to be passed and it has merely to see that there has been application of mind which is evident from the order impugned. In view of such, the application is dismissed. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)