1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.3.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.RAJESWARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.M.AKBAR ALI H.C.P(MD)No.194 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 V.Mani .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Inspector of General Police, South Zone, Madurai. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 3.The Inspector of Police, South Police Station, Thoothukudi. 4.Subbiah 5.S.Amma Ponnu 6.Pradeep 7.Nandhini .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus to direct the 1st to 3rd respondents to secure the detenu and produce the body and person of the detenu, the petitioner's wife S.Kavitha, W/o.V.Mani, aged 25 years before this Court, illegally detained by the 4th to 7th respondents and set her at liberty forthwith. For petitioner : Mr.P.Pethu Rajesh For respondents 1 to 3: Mr.P.N.Pandidurai, Addl.Public Prosecutor For respondents 4 to 7: Mr.R.Anand ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.RAJESWARAN,J) The petitioner has filed the above Habeas Corpus Petition to trace his wife who is stated to have married him on 3.2.2011 at Arulmigu Viswanathaswamy Thirukoil at Ottapidaram Village, Thoothukudi District. The parents of the detenue did not accept the marriage as both of them belong to a different community. The petitioner's parents, on the other hand, accepted the marriage. The detenue/alleged wife had completed her M.C.A in a Private College in Sivakasi. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, on 4.3.2011, the detenue received a call from her parents stating that some one was seriously ill and on account of that, she was asked to come to their house. Therefore, the detenue was dropped by the petitioner at the house of the fourth respondent. Thereafter, the detenue did not come back home and the whereabouts of the detenue is not known till date. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondents 4 to 7 have illegally detained her. Hence, the Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed. 3. On notice, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced the detenue before this Court. 4. We interacted with the detenue, who claims to be 25 years old and has completed her M.C.A.,. She submitted that she is with her parents now and she would like to be with her parents only and she does not want to go with the petitioner. 5. The petitioner was also present before this Court and he was also appraised of what the detenue has informed the Court. 6. Therefore, while recording the fact that the detenue is not in illegal custody by any one and she is with her parents/respondents herein on her own, this Habeas Corpus Petition is closed as nothing further could be considered in this. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (L.A) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The Inspector of General Police, South Zone, Madurai. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 3.The Inspector of Police, South Police Station, Thoothukudi. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. + 1 cc to Mr.P.Pethu Rajesh, Advocate, SR No.7718 H.C.P.(MD)No.194 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 22.03.2011 (asvm) RJ/11.4.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/