IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11146 of 2010 1.JIBACHH MAHTO @ LATTAR MAHTO SON OF LATE SONE LAL MAHTO 2.ROGAHI DEVI W/O JIBACH MAHTO @ LATTER MAHTO BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGEKATMA KHOIR, P.S. LAKHANOUR, DIST. MADHUBANI …..PETITIONERS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 27.4.2010 Heard the parties. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with complaint case no. 622 of 2009 corresponding to Tr. No. 769 of 2010 in which cognizance has been taken under section 498 (A) of the Indian penal Code. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that they are parents –in-laws of the complainant and the allegation of demand of dowry and torture is in the nature of general and omnibus and main allegation is against the husband Ganesh Mahto. By referring to paragraph 12 of the petition it is further submitted that both the petitioners are aged about 70 years. Learned counsel for the State though opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but has not disputed the aforesaid position. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case , let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four - 2 - weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. Ist class, Jhanjharpur, in connection with the above noted case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J. ) M.Rahman