IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 1009 of 2008 Date of Decision:21.11. 2008 Daulat Ram ...... Appellant Versus Firm M/s Babu Ram Basso Ram and another ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Rakesh Nagpal, Advocate for the appellant. **** Ajay Tewari, J. As per order dated 31.3.2008 it was noticed that the decree was for an amount of Rs. 20,000/- and learned counsel was given an opportunity to show how this appeal was maintainable in view of Section 102 of the C.P.C. Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that the original suit had been filed for recovery of Rs. 30,000/- and, therefore, Section 102 of the C.P.C. is not applicable. In my opinion the intention of the legislature was to filter out cases which involve a dispute of less than Rs. 25,000/-. Undisputedly the present is such a case. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed. No costs. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE November 21, 2008 sunita