1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6623 OF 2009 Shakuntala w/o Trimbakrao Deshmukh .. Petitioner Versus Vasantrao s/o Sandu Patil and ors. .. Respondents Shri L.V.Sangit, Advocate for petitioner Shri Girish Rane, Advocate for respondents 1 and 2 Shri S.V.Kurundkar, Addl.Govt.Pleader for respondent No.7-State Respondents No.3 to 5 served CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA DATE : 1st April, 2010 PER COURT 1. Heard Shri L.V.Sangit, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Shri Girish Rane, learned Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. 2. The present petition takes exception to the order dated 13.4.2009 passed by the learned Additional Commissioner, Nasik Division, Nasik whereby the R.T.S.Appeal No.353 of 2007 filed by the present petitioner came to be dismissed. The Commissioner has observed that in view of the fact that the proceedings are subjudiced in the civil Court and the revenue authorities are only concerned with recording the mutation entries, no fault can be found with the said finding. 3. It is made clear that whatever findings would be given in the civil proceedings the same would be binding on the revenue authorities. All 2 mutations that take place would be subject to the decision of the civil Court. In view of the said position, writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) (vvr/6623.09wp)