IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 8018 of 2009 Between: Syed Asadullah S/o. Mir Farooq Ali R/o. H.No. 20-3-1150, Fateh Darwaza, Inside Dewdi, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer Hussainialam Police Station Hyderabad. 2 Rasheeda Begum W/o. Mohd. Abdul Kareem Residing at H.No. 23-3-258, Beside Ialan Saheb Mosque, Sultanshahi, Hyderabad. 3 Mohd. Aleemuddin S/o. Mohd. Sharfuddin Residing at H.No. 23-3-258, Beside Ialan Saheb Mosque, Sultanshahi, Hyderabad. 4 Mohd. Abdul Kaleem S/o. Mohd. Abdul Qayum Residing at H.No. 23-3-258, Beside Ialan Saheb Mosque, Sultanshahi, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the inaction on the part of the 1st respondent in not investigating into Cr.No. 120 / 2008 though the same was registered on 7-7-2008, as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and consequently direct the 1st respondent to investigate into the said case and to file the report in accordance with Law. Counsel for the Petitioner: MS.ANJUM YASEEN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.8018 of 2009 Order: None appears for the petitioner, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. The writ petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the first respondent, namely, the Station House Officer, Hussainialam Police Station, Hyderabad in investigating into Crime No.120 of 2008 registered for the offence under Sections 406, 420, 384, 403, 495 and 506 r/w Section 34 IPC on the complaint lodged by the petitioner against respondents 2 to 4, as illegal and arbitrary. Today when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the first respondent produced written instructions, wherein it is stated that the investigation is pending for want of examination of the cited witnesses and also independent witnesses to prove the guilt of the accused, and that investigation would be completed and an appropriate report/charge sheet would be filed before the concerned Court at the earliest. In view of the stand taken by the first respondent in his written instructions that investigation would be completed and charge sheet would be filed before the concerned Court at the earliest, no further adjudication is necessary in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 02.06.2009 VGB