FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2389/2009 with CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2390/2009. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. AS Jondhale, Adv for Applicants; Mr.SS Deo, Adv. For Applicant (in Cri.Appln.2390/09) Mr.PM Shinde, APP for State; ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 27th July, 2009. ... . Heard respective learned Counsel. 2) Learned Counsel representing original complainant – Sandip Dhanraj Bagade, is practically not serious while arguing the matter to oppose quashing of F.I.R as passingly he has referred, the parties have worked out the controversies, as respective parties are present, identified by the Counsel; 3) Considering the recitals in the FIR, giving rise to offence, vide Crime No. I-73/2009 registered with Sillod Police Station, it does not even apply to the logic of causing the threats or bodily injury as indicated therein. In view of what is stated by the complainant (original Respondent no.2)) having no objection to quash the F.I.R., following order - 4) F.I.R. I.73/2009 registered at Sillod Police station, District Aurangabad is quashed. 5) Criminal Applications are disposed of in above terms. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/cran2389.09