fiS913gg8SS"S'B'K SSS'essfsias'f^iKft IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGaRH AT BIIASPUR URIT PETITION N0..?^.? 2006 e;. PETITIONER ?v^:^ ,...- -i\-Xj\° .^••••" <;;:^?y' '^.^ RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION 1 :2) ^--:3) ^4) :5) ^-6) 7) -:8) :9) 10 ^' 11) 12) Surya Prakash S/o. Kart.i-krain Sahu, aged about 40 years, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Pisid, Tahsil Kasdol, District Raipur R/o. Village Pisid Tahsil Kasdol, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Ramratan S/o. Firatram Patel, aged about 45 years, Anant Kumar Sahu S/o. Ganesh ^r aged about 60 years Amarnath Patel S/o. Gangaram ^ aged about 35 years, Ishwar Patel, S/o. Shanker / aged about 23 years, Gulal Sahu, S/o. Puriram ^ aged about 32 years, Ghanshyam Khandekar S/o. Ramprasad, aged about 25 years, Chamaru Kaiwartya S/o. Bavdha aged'about 36 years, Daras Sahu S/o. Mahadas aged about 40 years, Dukaluram S/o. Gangu aged -^ about 40 years, Manharan S/o. Balaram aged ^/ about 27 years Rajkumar Panka S/o. Kartikram aged about 40 years Respondents 1 to 11 are residents of Village Pisid Tahsil Kasdol, District Raipur (C.G.) Sub Divi&ional Offic&r, Bilaigarh District Raipur (C.G-.) V/ UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUJUifCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CEERTIOBARI^^OUiinSAMUS, PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT^^R WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIBECIIONS, OBDER OR ORDERES: •— XI-HC-22 antw^i fS^ai^T .ititli* 'gfSct Kvr v7 ^-~?\':^ "TSI ^rn^ic)ii, »Tiiy)is,ftfii+iy t^.f. ^.. §^.. Wfefrl •RTtRif 4 fe^ ^SRSR •^; 3ipgH sni?i Shri Rajesh Pandey, co Shri S.C. Verma, counpel for rcspondeiits No. 1 to 6 and 9 to 11, None for respondents Njo. 7 & 8. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, 12/8tate.. Leamed counsel for thd fonual defect, the petitiou [uisel for petitioner. Panel Lawyer for respoudent No. petitioner submits fhat due to soine may fail, therefore, he prays for wifhdram'al of the petitiou w^th permission to file afresh.and also prays to rctum the certified topy of the impugned onler, to which counsel for other parties havcj aJlowed. Accordingly, withp| no objection. Considered. I ain satisfied wifh ttie fact that on account of formal defects present m the petition, it piay faU. Therefore, fhe petitioner's piayer to wifhdiaw tfae petidon wifh pennission to fik a&esh i"? •rmission to file a&esli, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. t^etum certified copy of the impugned order to the petitioner on s^ibstitution of ttie same by photocopy, wifhin fifteen days. | Sd/- C.C.aspermles. j VK. Shnvastava Judge [Tfl^^f^