IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6683 of 2008 Sanjay Kumar, son of Sri Jagdish Roy, resident of village & P.O. Rahta, P.S. Kumarkhand, District- Madhepura. ……………. Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar 2.The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna 3.The District Magistrate, Madhepura 4.District Superintendent of Education, Madhepura, District- Madhepura 5.The Block Extension Education Officer, Kumarkhand, District- Madhepura 6.The Block Development Officer, Kumarkhand Block, District- Madhepura 7.The Circle Officer, Kumarkhand Block, District- Madhepura 8.Panchayat Sachiv, Gram Panchayat Rahta Kumarkhand Block, Madhepura 9.Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Rahta, Kumarkhand Block, Madhepura 10.Deepak Kumar, S/O Sri Mahabir Pd.Mandal, resident of village Jairampur, P.O. & P.S. Murliganj, District- Madhepura. …………. Respondents ---------------------------------- with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7288 of 2008 Deepak Kumar S/O Sri Mahabir Pd.Mandal, resident of village Jairampur, P.O. & P.S. Murliganj, District- Madhepura. ………. Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.The Chief Secretary of Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.The Secretary of State Commission of Extremely Backward Class, Bihar, Patna 4.The District Magistrate, Madhepura 5.District Superintendent of Education, Madhepura, 6.The Block Education Extension Officer, Kumarkhand Block, District- Madhepura 7.The Block Development Officer, Kumarkhand, District- Madhepura 8.Mukhiya of Rahta Gram Panchayat Block Kumarkhand District- Madhepura 9.The Secretary of Gram Panchayat, Block Kumar Khand, District- Madhepura 10.Headmaster of Navsirjeet Primary School, Aadibasi Tola of Gram Panchayat Rahta Block, Kumarkhand, District- Madhepura. ………….. Respondents ---------------------------------- 2 4. 02/08/2011 Petitioner of C.W.J.C.No.6683 of 2008 is aggrieved by the order of the Panchayat Secretary dated 11.3.2008, as contained in Annexure-3, by which petitioner’s appointment as Panchayat Teacher has been cancelled and Respondent no.10 (Petitioner of C.W.J.C. No.7288 of 2008) has been appointed. Grievance of the petitioner of C.W.J.C. No.7288 of 2008 (Respondent no.10 in C.W.J.C.No.6683 of 2008) is that pursuant to the said order of the Block Development Officer though he was appointed as Panchayat Teacher, but on the same day he was relieved. Learned counsel for the petitioner of C.W.J.C. No.7288 of 2008 submits that the petitioner of C.W.J.C. No.6683 of 2008 was appointed on the quota of Extremely Back-ward Class on the basis of a caste certificate which after subsequent verification has been found to be false. Against the order of the Panchayat Secretary, both the petitioners have an alternative remedy before the statutory Appellate Authority constituted under the Rules. 3 In the circumstances, both the writ applications are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the concerned Appellate Authority in accordance with law within four weeks from today. If they do so, the Appellate Authority shall call for the original records, if necessary, hear both the parties and decide the matter positively within two months from the date of filing of appeal/representation by the petitioners. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)