IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3149 of 2011 MD. RUHUL AMIN @ RUHUL DOCTOR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 09.03.2011 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 376/312 of the I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. It is alleged that the petitioner on the assurance of marriage established (physical relationship) with the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that establishment of the physical relationship with consent does not amounts to offence under Section 376 I.P.C. The complaint petition reflects that 8 months after the occurrence the complaint had been filed. Moreover the informant has now retracted from initial version and a joint petition has been filed to that effect. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner Md. Ruhul Amin @ Ruhul Doctor, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court-below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Pranpur P.S. Case No. 117 of 2010 2 subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. Mkr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)