IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2212 of 2006 RAM BILAS TIWARY & ANR Versus JITNI DEVI & ORS ----------- 3. 22.9.2008 Surendra/ Heard the counsel for the petitioner. For the reasons mentioned in this application (I.A. No. 4477 of 2008) the same is allowed and the name of the deceased O.P.No.1 is directed to be deleted and in her place her heirs as mentioned in paragraph 6 will be substituted. Coming to the merits of this case, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order, inasmuch as by the impugned order only amendment with regard to description of the plaintiff in context of her husband’s name or some address has been sought to be allowed. In the opinion of this Court such formal amendment in no view of the matter would change the nature of the suit or prejudice the defendant-petitioners in any manner, who in fact have not even filed their written statement till date. That being so, this application is wholly misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)