IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6954 of 2009 MD.JIAUL . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 6. 4.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner husband apprehends arrest in a complaint case sent for investigation under Section 156(3) of the Cr. P.C. registered under Sections 498A of the Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The defence is of a compromise when they have decided to separate, Den Mohar paid and informant having filed an application not desirous to contest the proceedings any further. Counsel for the State submits that these are facts for verification. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 171/08 (arising out of Complaint Case No. 33C/08), subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. 2 The jurisdiction of the Court below, after verification of facts, circumstances warranting, shall not be precluded in any manner by the present order in so far as orders for cancellation of bail are concerned. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)