SBCWP NO. 1452/08. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR. O R D E R Sheo Ram Versus Board of Revenue Ajmer and others S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITON NO.1452/2008. Date of order :- 18/2/2008. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Miss Gayatri Rathore for the petitioner. ***** This writ petition has been filed against the order dated 29/1/2007 whereby the Board of Revenue has rejected the revision petition filed by the petitioner against the order dated 11/7/2007 passed by the revenue appellate court. The revenue appellate authority in that order upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, discontinued its earlier order of status-quo dated 6/7/2007. An argument that was raised by the learned counsel for the respondents that inspite of the fact that caveat was filed on their behalf, order dated 6/7/2007 was passed, even though the direction was issued earlier on 5/7/2007 for service of notice on the advocate as Caveator respondents. The learned Board of Revenue has upheld the order dated 11/7/2007 by observing that according to the record, service of the notice on the caveator respondents was not found to have been affected SBCWP NO. 1452/08. properly. All that was done by the revenue appellate authority vide order dated 11/7/2007 was to discontinue the order dated 6/7/2007. The petitioner is always free to press for arguments on his application for grant of interim relief before the revenue appellate court where that matter is still pending. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order, I do not find any extraordinary reason to interfere with the impugned-order of the Board of Revenue rejecting the revision petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with observations made above. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil