1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4389 OF 2010 Kishor Madhukarrao Suryawanshi Vs. Divisional Deputy Director Ground Water Survey & Development Amravati & Ano. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Shri N. R. Saboo Adv for petitioner. CORAM: .B. P. DHARMADHIKARI J. Dated: 21 st SEPTEMBER, 2010. Simple question is whether petitioner has put in 240 days of continuous service prior to October 1994. Learned counsel for the petitioner was given sufficient opportunity to show that prior to October 1994 i.e. after November 1993 till his termination he had put in 240 days of continuous service. The document at page 39 to which attention is invited, shows that petitioner did not complete 240 days service in continuation. The basic contention is the said number of days is taken from Rig-register and name of petitioner appeared in the register maintained for daily wager. Though the witness on said register is cross- 2 examined, this question is not put to that witness at all. Learned Member Industrial Court reached a finding that the petitioner did not complete 240 days continuous service. Shri Saboo learned counsel contends that such a finding could not have been recorded in revision for the first time when Labour Court did not record any finding. I find no force in this contention. There is no case for interference in the matter. Writ petition is dismissed with no costs. JUDGE svk 3 4 5