CWP(T) No. 6216/2008 18.08.2010 Present: Mr. Surinder Thakur, vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Dhaulta, vice Mr. D. N. Ronta, Advocate, for the respondents Petitioner was engaged as a Security Guard with respondent No.1. He is seeking parity in the pay scale of a Security Guard employed in the Himachal Pradesh University. Learned counsel for the petitioner, in support of his case has relied upon the decision rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in State of H.P. vs. Chet Ram & Ors. Latest HLJ 2006 HP 327. In the said case, it has simply been held that the cooks working under the same employer cannot be treated differently in relation to their pay scale when the nature of work performed is same and similar. 2. The ratio of law laid down in the said case does not help the petitioner. Petitioner is not seeking parity with the similarly situated persons employed by respondent No.1. That apart, there is nothing on record to show the similarity in the work which is being performed by the petitioner and his counter part in the H.P. University. It cannot be said that any legally enforceable right of the petitioner stands violated. Hence, the present petition without any merit is dismissed. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. August 18 2010 (rana)