1 srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Application No.399 of 2010 In Criminal Appeal No.634 of 2006 Sandeep Prabhakar Wadnekar Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent Applicant in person. Mr.F.R.Shaikh, APP for State. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. March 23, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Sandeep Wadnekar – party in person and he prays for being released on bail during the pendency of Criminal Appeal No.634 of 2006 which has been filed by him challenging the order of conviction and sentence dated 13/9/2004 passed in Sessions Case No.153 of 2003 by the learned 2nd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik. 2 2. The applicant was granted furlough leave which is expiring today and this application is based solely on the additional ground that on 24/3/2008 Dr.R.G. Bhusale was present before this Court and his oral depositions have been recorded. The applicant claims that if these depositions are taken into consideration, his wife did not die a homicidal death and she committed suicide. From the record it is seen that Criminal Application No.153 of 2008 praying for bail was rejected by this Court on merits on 24/6/2008 when the depositions of Dr. R.G. Bhusale were also on record. Even otherwise we do not see any case made out as of now to suspend the order of sentence and release the applicant on bail. The applicant then stated that he requires temporary leave / bail for attending to his daughter’s college admissions. As and when such application is filed, it would be considered on its own merits. So far as this application is concerned, we are not inclined to release the applicant on bail and there are no changed circumstances in his favour as of now. 3. Hence the application is rejected. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)