HIGH $QURT OF CHHA’W’!SGARH: EiLi‘SPUR Wfit Petiiion §S§ No. 3438 of 2GQ§ Kashi Ram Yadav, Sic. Late Shri Samaru Ram Yadav, aged about 58 years, Rm. Shankar Nagarffu§5§nagan Near Khamhardih Ta{ab, Raipur, Chhatiéwarh. Pemioner Versus 1) Food Corooraticn of india throuqh Managing Direcmr! Head Quarter ~ New Deihi, 18—20 Barakhamba Lar‘e, New Deihi. Respondents 2) The Executive Directog Foo‘d Corporation of mdia, Dhiraj Arma Buiiding, Near Anani Kanekar Poiice Station, Bandra (East) Mumbai £03051 . 3) The General Manager, Food Corporation of indie, Ring Road Chouraha: Telibandha, Raipur. Chhattisgam. 4) The Area Manager, Food Corporaiion of india, Maoeena Bonding Jail Road, Raipur; Chhattisgarh 5) The Emeioyees Provident Fund Organizatioo, through Commissioner Regionai emce; age” Freon, Mayo? Bhawan, Cannaught Circus, New Dei’ni-i. WVrit Petition under Artioie 226 of the Constitu’cion of india. ) 3B: Hon’ble Mr. satish K. Agnihotri, J. Frese'rs‘tE—wh§fri*Panka} Shrivastava, oouneei for petitioner, Shri BP. Gupta, counsel for the respondents No. 1 to 4. ORAL ORnER gPassed on 4‘“ day of July, 2908) Wirh consent of both the pames, the matter is hearo nnaily. 2) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merits, except that the petitioner be permitted to make a representation in terms of the order dated 244 0‘2007 passed by this Court in WP. No. 6302/2007 (RB. Uikey Vs. Food Corporation of india and others). 3) Shri BF. Gupta, iearned counsei appearing for the respondents No. i to 4 \x has no obieotion. .\\ \\ L 4) The petition is accordingiy disposed of in the same {ems cf RB Uikey (supra) i.e., the peiitianer, if so advised, may me a detaiied representation before the respondent No.1 aiong with a copy of this order and a copy of the writ. pet§tion within a period of ihree weeks from today and if such a representation is filed and the concerned documents of the petitioner have not been forwarded by respondent Not to respondent No.5, respondent No.1, in tum‘ snati examine the points raised by the petitioner and forward the papers reiating to the pension of the petitioner to respondent No5 within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt of the said representation or shaii dispose of the representation, in accordance with iaw within the said period. in case, the concerned documents of the petitioner are aiready forwarded, this order shaii carrv no toroe. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Raju J‘