IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS FRIDAY, THE 13TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 24TH MAGHA 1930 WA.No. 2185 of 2007() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.6319/2007 Dated 21/08/2007 .................... APPELLANT(S): 5TH RESPONDENT IN THE WPC --------------------------------------- SMT.ANNA CONCEPTION, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (SOCIAL STUDIES), (NOW HEADMISTRESS), ST.ANTONY'S HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, VALIYATHURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.KRB.KAIMAL, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.B.UNNIKRISHNA KAIMAL RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER, RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4 AND 6 IN THE WPC -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. HYMA KUMARI, W/O. S.SREEVALSAN, AGED 53, YEARS, HEADMISTRESS, ST.ANTONY'S HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, VALIYATHURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 3. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, JAGATHY, TRIVANDRUM-14. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. THE MANAGER, ST.ANTONY'S HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, VALIYATHURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. SMT.K.LAILA BEEVI, HEADMISTRESS(RETD), ST.ANTONY'S HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, VALIYATHURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED FOR R1 SRI.K.E.HAMZA FOR R1 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. R. BINDU FOR R2,3,4 SRI.K.A.MANZOOR ALI FOR R6 S.P. ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/02/2009 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A.No. 2185 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 13th day of February, 2009 JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair, J. The appellant is the 5th respondent in the writ petition. This appeal is filed by her challenging the interim order passed by the learned Single Judge in the Writ Petition on 21.8.2007. Normally interim orders can be permitted to be challenged in appeal only in rare cases. We feel that this appeal could be disposed of with liberty to both sides to move the learned Single Judge for early hearing of the matter. If such a motion is made by any of the parties, the learned Judge shall endeavour to hear the matter expeditiously. 2. With the above direction, this Writ Appeal is closed. (K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR) Judge (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS) Judge tm