1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.242 OF 2008 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.1438 OF 2008 RAHUL VIPINCHANDER AGARWAL ..PLAINTIFFS VS. MANOJ S. KATYAL & ANR. ..DEFENDANTS Ms. Sushma Singh for the Plaintiffs None for Defendants CORAM: Smt. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : 9th APRIL, 2009 P.C.: 1. This suit is filed under the written contract reflected in the Plaintiffs' two invoices dated 20.06.2006 & 21.06.2006 signed by the Plaintiffs and the delivery challans dated 20.06.2006 & 21.06.2006 signed by the Defendants. Consequent upon the said contracts the Defendant No.1 issued 5 cheques dated 26.06.2006. 11.07.2006, 08.07.2006, 21.09.2006 & 25.09.2006. Each of these cheques has been dishonoured. The Plaintiffs 2 notice of demand remained unreplied. The writ of summons in the suit has been served upon both the Defendants by registered post in June 2008. The Defendants have entered appearance through their Advocate Mr. Wadgaonkar. The Plaintiffs have taken out this Summons for Judgment to which no affidavit in reply is filed. The averments in the plaint and summons for judgment remains uncontroverted. Summons for Judgment made absolute as prayed. The suit is decreed accordingly. Refund as per rules. The original documents of the Plaintiffs are taken on record and marked Exhibit A (Colly). (Smt. Roshan Dalvi, J)