y" <, €'• ..^7-^ .....^€^ .'•"•^•"'ssr^">~ y-^v ^nt^^QO_iit^CL^3^^0Q^ a/olate Stei .Ramestow^r about 3Q R^o Vifla^e ^faia, FCf^t J^mte^a, t^i^ ft-axapptff INstrict Sar^Aja ^C.O.I ^ ^ \^^ •^.^ II State^fCfoiaatti^^ffatti-m^a 31ie Becretary l^ibal WeJ^re Department 1D.K.S. Shsewrsai jteiipyjE'^C.O^ r' 21 Tte Assdstaait C^nmissiQffigr, Triteai Deveioi^Metit Aaabifeaipur Bistrict Sarguja ^C.B.i m %e BSocSi Education Gfficer Pratappur, District S^guja i(C.G4 Wi%2T CON^aSUIION ^P IN&IA "^^^w^k^'ssWM^^. ywwiuyft^ HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIQNER WRIT PETITION (S) N0.7366 OF 2009 " Vinay Kumar Singh Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Ms Sudha Agrawal, counsel for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 17th day of December, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner seeks permissSon of this Court to withdraw this petition, to which learned counsei appearing for the State has no objection. 2) It Ss ordered, as prayed for. 3) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gowri