IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6417 of 1991 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- KUTCHH DISTIRCT PANCHAYAT Versus KANTILAL P KANABAR -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR HS MUNSHAW for Petitioner MS VINITA S. VINAYAK for MR PM THAKKAR for Respondent No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 2, 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI Date of decision: 29/09/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT When this petition is called out for final hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner Panchayat states that the respondent No.1 who was promoted as a Deputy Chitnis on 22.11.1995 in regular course has been retired from service on 30.9.1997 with retiral benefits and therefore, nothing survives in this petition. It is also pointed out that when rule was issued on the petition on 13.12.1991, the Court had permitted the Panchayat to act as per the seniority list prepared after the Division Bench judgement of this Court, which is at Annexure "D" to the petition (Special Civil Application No. 294/78 and other cognate matters decided on 11.8.1983). In this view of the matter, the petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. --- */Mohandas