1 APP (L) 13 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL (L) NO.13 OF 2010 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3512 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.22O2 OF 2009 M/s.Sai Lee Developers and Ors. ..... Appellants V/s. M/s.Great Deal Developers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.Surel Shah with Mr.Rohit Shetty, for the appellants. Mr.Ruchir Tolat i/by L.C.Tolat & Co., for respondent No.1. Mr.Swapnil Bangur, for respondent No.4. CORAM :P.B.MAJMUDAR & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 06th OCTOBER, 2010 P.C. 1. This appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 2nd September, 2009. The appellants are the original defendant Nos.1 to 4. The respondents-plaintiffs have filed the said suit for specific performance of the suit agreement. 2. The learned counsel for the appellants made a statement before the learned Single Judge that no further third party rights will be created in the suit property. It is also pointed out that there is already an order of status quo granted in the proceedings arising out of Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act. The learned Single Judge has fixed the 2 APP (L) 13 of 2010 notice of motion for hearing within four weeks from 02-09-2000. It is also pointed out that the notice of motion is placed for hearing tomorrow. In view of this, we would not like to intercept the proceedings which is at ad-interim stage, as bi-party hearing of the notice of motion would be by tomorrow and hopefully it will be dealt with within two weeks from today and the learned Single Judge may dispose of the notice of motion at the earliest. 3. The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that in Para No.6 the appellants are directed to disclose the transaction till date and appropriate affidavit in this behalf will be filed pointing out that since 2007 no further third party interest is created and property is not transferred to any one. The learned Single Judge may consider these aspects and it is for the learned Single Judge to consider as to whether any further particulars are required in connection with the subject matter of the suit. We express no opinion on this aspect. 4. In view of what is stated above, the appeal is disposed of. ( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )