1 W.P.no.729.99 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 729 OF 1999 Nashik Workers’ Union ... Petitioner v/s M/s.Hindustan Fasteners P. Ltd. & ors. ... Respondents Mr.Jatin Sheth holding for Mr.Bhavesh Parmar i/by Mr. Colin Gonsalves for the petitioner. Mr.P.C.Pawaskar for respondent No.1. Mr.P.G.Sawant, “B” Panel counsel for the State. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 26TH OCTOBER, 2010 P.C.: 1. The petition has been filed against the order dated 19.11.1998 passed by the Industrial Court rejecting the application for recognition filed by the petitioner union under the provisions of Section 11 of the M.R.T.U. & P.U.L.P. Act, 1971. 2. The petition was admitted. There was no question 2 W.P.no.729.99 of granting any stay of the impugned orders. The recognition was sought on the basis of the membership record for the period of six months prior to 14.9.1995, when the application for recognition was filed. 3. In my opinion, the petition has become infructuous. The petitioner is free to apply for recognition afresh, if so advised. As such, an application, if filed, will be in respect of a fresh period. The observations made by the Industrial Court in the impugned order will not bind the parties. 4. Writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. ..... 3 W.P.no.729.99