1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3354 OF 2009 Mr. Murlidhar Dattatraya Warunjikar ..Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents Mr. Uday Warunjikar for Petitioner. Mrs. M.P.Thakur, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 CORAM : D. D. SINHA & A. A. SAYED , JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 1, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard Mr. Warunjikar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Thakur, learned AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the statement made in para 5 of the affidavit filed by Mr. Vithal Lalji Dhole, Jt. Secretary Medical Education and Drugs Department, the grievance of the petitioner gets redressed. Para 5 of the said affidavit reads thus:- “It is respectfully submitted that this proposal of inclusion of the postgraduate course of MS Orthopaedics at Government Medical College, Miraj in the schedule of MMC, is under scrutiny and consideration of this office. After due consultations with Maharashtra Medical Council appropriate decision as per the provisions of Section 28 of Maharashtra Medical Council Act, 2 1965 will be taken as early as possible“ It is however, contended that the affidavit is filed in the month of September, 2009 and though it is stated in the affidavit that the decision shall be taken after due consultation with the Maharashtra Medical Council as early as possible. However, till this date nothing has been done and therefore, prays that some observations may be made in this regard. 2 In the circumstances, in view of the statement made by the respondent Nos.1 and 2 reflected in para 5 of the affidavit, writ petition is disposed of. We expect the respondent Nos 1 and 2 to complete the procedure by taking decision after following due procedure as mentioned in para 5 within reasonable time. (D. D. SINHA, J.) ( A. A. SAYED, J.)