Criminal Misc.No. M- 13417 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.No. M- 13417 of 2010 Date of decision:- 26.5.2010 Suneet Singla and others ...Petitioners Versus State of U.T. Chandigarh and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present:- Mr. Kanwar Sanjiv Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate for Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1-U.T.Chandigarh . Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2. RAM CHAND GUPTA J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing of FIR No.70 dated 14.4.2010, under Sections 323 and 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sector-31, Chandigarh (Annexure P-1) on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-3). I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. It has been contended by learned counsel for the parties that petitioner No.1 is owner of Safeguard Security Agency, whereas petitioner Nos.2 and 3 and respondent No.2-complainant are employees of that Security Agency and that the dispute between them has since been settled due to intervention of respectable persons from both the sides vide compromise (Annexure P-3) in the form of affidavit, executed by respondent No.2. Respondent No.2-complainant also appeared through counsel and filed his short reply by way of affidavit admitting the factum of compromise and stating that he is having no objection if the FIR and consequential proceedings are quashed. In appropriate cases FIR can be quashed on the basis of Criminal Misc.No. M- 13417 of 2010 -2- compromise by exercising power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are not compoundable. It was so held by Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab, 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052. Hence, in the interest of harmonious relations between the parties, the present petition is accepted and FIR No.70 dated 14.4.2010, under Sections 323 and 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sector-31, Chandigarh alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, is quashed qua petitioners- Suneet Singla, Tinku Mehra and Narinder Tiwari. The petition is disposed of. May 26, 2010 ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) vj JUDGE