IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. No. 904 of 2009. Decided on: 26.07.2010. Madan Gopal Singh. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): It is jointly represented by the parties that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in L.P.A. No. 36 of 2010, titled as Sita Ram Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to count the period of adhoc services followed by regularization of the petitioner for the purpose of increment and pension, strictly as per the judgment cited hereinabove. The needful shall be done within a period of six weeks from today. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July, 26, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - - 3 -