BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Eighth day of July Two Thousand Nine PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.8389 of 2011 1 SUDALAIMANI @ MURUGAN 2 MANIKANDAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1 & 2 Vs STATE REP. BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATHANKULAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DT CR NO. 124/2011 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.P.SENTHIL Advocate For Respondent : M/S. A.RAMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as A1 & A2 and they were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 23.06.2011 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 341, 323 and 392(NP) I.P.C., and section 3 (1)(x) of SC/ST (POA) Act, in Crime No.124 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that a case has been registered against them for the offence under sections 341, 323 and 392(NP) I.P.C., and Section 3(1) (X) of SC/ST (POA) Act. He further submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for enlargment on bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioners way laid the de-facto complainant and assaulted him and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the occurrence took place on 22.06.2011 and a case has been registered against the petitioners for the offences under Sections 341, 323 and 392(NP) I.P.C., and Section 3(1)(X) of SC/ST (POA) Act and the investigation is considerably over, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ satisfaction of the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. sd/- 08/07/2009 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE II ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, TIRUNELVELI 2 -DO-THRO' THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE TIRUNELVELI 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATHANKULAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DT 5 THE OFFICER INCHARGE SUB JAIL, NANGUNERI 6 THE SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI +1. CC to M/S. M.P.SENTHIL Advocate SR.No.22122 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.8389 of 2011 Date :08/07/2009 SMA/11.7.2011/8C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/