1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C.A.W. No. 2291/09 (In W.P. No. 2247/01) Z.P. Amravati v. Ravishankar Ramprasad Shukla ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's and Registrar's orders orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. J.B. Kasat Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. A.V. Bhide Advocate for Res. ..... CORAM: A.B.CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 13 th NOVEMBER,_2009. This is an application for speaking to minutes. In the application it is stated that the decision- (2001) 1 SCC 73 ( S.B.I. v. Ram Chandra Dubey) holding that application under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act is not maintainable in view of the earlier adjudication, relied on by the petitioner has not been referred in the judgment pronounced on 1.10.2009 in W.P. No.2247/01. I have already held in my judgment that there was a decree of Civil Court in the matter of declaration that respondent is entitled to back wages which was not challenged. In the wake of this 2 declaration and in the absence of dispute about the quantum of back wages, the judgment was made by me. The application is thus frivolous. It is not necessary that while writing judgment the Court should refer each and every judgment even for established principles of law burdening the record. The application is therefore dismissed with costs of Rs.500/- payable to the respondent within four weeks. JUDGE /TA/