IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 27TH JANUARY 2011 / 7TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 9427 of 2004(V) ------------------------ PETITIONER : -------------------- K. REGHUNATHAN, GOVT.CONTRACTOR, K.P.10/196, LAYAM, KANNAMMOOLA, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARATMENT OF IRRIGATION, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION, SOUTH CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DIVISION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. T.T. MUHAMOOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 9427 of 2004(V) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE SELECTION NOTICE DTD. 11.12.2002 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE SELECTION NOICE NO. D3-3501/02/ISC DTD. 11.12.2002 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE SELECTION NOICE NO. D3-4586/02/ISC DTD. 11.12.2002 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4 : COPY OF THE ORDER NO. D3-3501/2002/ISC DTD. 22.07.2003 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P5 : COPY OF THE ORDER NO. D3-4587/2002/ISC DTD. 22.07.2003 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P6 : COPY OF THE ORDER NO. D3-4586/2002/ISC DTD. 22.07.2003 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P7 : COPY OF THE ORDER NO. G.O.(P) 83/00/PWD DTD 18.12.2000 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT. EXT.P8 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD 22.12.2003 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.9427/2004-V ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 27th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks for a direction commanding the respondents to extend the time for completing the balance 15% of the 3 works undertaken by the petitioner pursuant to Exts.P1 to P3 proceedings, without imposing any fine. The petitioner was executing certain works on the basis of agreement Nos.12/SE/ISC/01-02, dated 19/12/2002, 14/SE/ISC/01-02, dated 19/12/2002 and 13/SE/ISC/02-03 dated 19/12/2002. It appears that the petitioner filed Ext.P8 representation seeking to extend time by five months without imposing any fine. 2. Evidently, it is a matter which the Government had to consider at that point of time. The terms of contract are governed by the agreement executed by the petitioner also. Therefore, the petitioner is not entitled for any reliefs in this proceedings. The writ petition is dismissed. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms