IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 27922 of 2008 Between: 1 M. Ranga Raju S/o. Lakshmana Raju R/o. Vadlaramapuram Village, Atmakur Mandal, Kurnool District. 2 M. Chinna Naganna S/o. Naganna R/o. Siddepalli Village, Atmakur Mandal, Kurnool District. 3 G. Suresh S/o. Thirupataiah R/o. Mustepalli Village, Atmakur Mandal, Kurnool District. 4 K. Chinna Swamy S/o. K. Mallaiah R/o. Amalapuram Village, Atmakur Mandal, Kurnool District. 5 L. Nagendrudu S/o. Pullaiah R/o. Bapananthapuram Village, Atmakur Mandal, Kurnool District. 6 P. Naganna S/o. Sivanna R/o. Nallakaluva Village, Atmakur Mandal, Kurnool District. 7 P. Manohar S/o. P. Seshaiah R/o. Krishnapuram Village, Atmakur Mandal, Kurnool District. 8 K. Lakshmidevi D/o. Danamaiah R/o. Indireswaram Village, Atmakur Mandal, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector / District Project Co-ordinator, NREGS, DWMA, Kurnool District, Kurnool. 2 The Project Director, National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, (NREGS), Collectorate Office, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 3 The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Atmakur Mandal, Kurnool District .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not permitting the petitioners to discharge their duties as field assistants as illegal. On 28-04-2009, Smt.Ch.Vedavani, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.3, placed before this Court final order passed by her client removing the petitioners from employment. The case is adjourned for today at the request of the learned Counsel for the petitioners. At the hearing, Sri K.Rathangapani Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the petitioners have neither received the orders terminating them from services nor any enquiry was held before such termination. He further stated that the learned Standing Counsel has supplied the copies of the termination orders. In my view, the cause in this Writ Petition as conceived does not survive for consideration in view of the final orders passed terminating the services of the petitioners. If the petitioners feel aggrieved by the said orders, they shall be free to question the same by availing appropriate remedy. Subject to the above observation, the Writ Petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.36598 of 2008 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is also dismissed as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 29th April, 2008 LUR ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The District Collector / District Project Co-ordinator, NREGS, DWMA, Kurnool District, Kurnool. 2 The Project Director, National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, (NREGS), Collectorate Office, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 3 The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Atmakur Mandal, Kurnool District 4 Two copies to the GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. 5 2 CD copies