IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8004 of 2010 USHA DEVI W/O SRI HARISHANKAR PRASAD R/O VILL +P.O. BAKHARI, P.S.BAKHARI, DISTT-EAST CHAMPARAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE SECRETARY, PRIMARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE EAST CHAMPARAN AT MOTIHARI 6. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION EAST CHAMPARAN AT MOTIHARI 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER PATAHI, EAST CHAMPARAN AT MOTIHARI 8. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER PATAHI, EAST CHAMPARAN AT MOTIHARI 9. THE MUKHIYA , GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ BAKHARI, PATAHI, EAST CHAMPARAN AT MOTIHARI 10. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ BAKHARI, PATAHI, EAST CHAMPARAN AT MOTIHARI 11. SMT. SUMITRA DEVI W/O SRI CHULHAI SAH R/O VILL +P.O.BAKHARI, BLOCK-PATAHI, DISTT-EAST CHAMPARAN AT MOTIHARI ----------- 02. 3.2.2011 Matter was heard yesterday and adjourned to enable counsel for the petitioner to verify whether the petitioner is gainfully employed and working as such as a Panchayat Teacher in Government Primary School, Dumraibela of Belwa Julfi Karabad Panchayat as has been stated in para 6 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the official respondents and evidence thereof has been annexed as Annexure-A. Counsel for the petitioner states that he is not in a position to get in touch with the client and therefore can not dispute or rebut the position. Since affidavit along with evidence has been filed on behalf 2 of the State, prima facie the assertion seems to be correct and the present writ application is a misplaced exercise with ulterior motive. The writ application is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)