IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7675 of 2009 DILIP KUMAR SAH Versus CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 2. 9.7.2009 The petitioner prays for quashing the order dated 29.5.2009 passed by respondent no.2 whereby an amount of Rs.48,11,216.90 has been asked to be repaid from the petitioner being default repayment. Besides this the Bankers without placing the detail account of the petitioner alongwith up to date interest thereon, issued a notice under section 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and enforcement of Security Interest Act. The grievance of the petitioner is that his cash credit limit was Rs.34/- lacs but he was given credit amount to sum of Rs.9/- lacs only. The Court is not inclined to go into merit of the case as the petitioner has an alternative remedy under section 13(3) of the Act which he ought to have availed. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties this writ application is disposed of with observation that the petitioner may file representation before the authority concerned within ten days from today. In case such representation is filed it will be open for the respondent to dispose of same expeditiously. It is made clear that no coercive step would be taken 2 against the petitioner till three weeks. Anilkr.sinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)