[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.15 OF 2007 Ajay Vijay Jain ..Applicant Vs. Special Executive Magistrate, Girgam Divn. Girgam & Ors. .Respondents ... Mr.S.B.Shetye Advocate for Applicant Smt.A.S.Pai, A.P.P. for State ... CORAM:SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM:SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM:SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE :OCTOBER 30, 2007 DATE :OCTOBER 30, 2007 DATE :OCTOBER 30, 2007 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant has preferred this application for quashing of Chapter Case No.66 of 2006. The said Chapter proceedings were initiated by the Special Executive Magistrate, Girgam Division, Girgam, Mumbai. In the said case notice dated 21.12.2006 was issued to the applicant. 3. It is an admitted fact that the said chapter proceedings have been initiated only on the basis of one C.R.No.293 of 2006 of D.B.Marg Police Station. [-2-] 4. The learned APP on instructions, states that the said complaint has been compromised between the parties on 28.8.2007. Moreover, as far as the chapter proceedings are concerned, no progress has been made in the said case and though six months period has expired, no extension was granted in the said chapter proceedings. In view of the fact that six months period has expired, the proceedings would automatically come to an end as no extension was granted. In this view of the matter, this application is disposed of in view of the fact that the proceedings have automatically come to an end. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]