^ a^ /--- /n OIMU IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATLBILASPUR W. P. (S), No. 32-3^pf 2009 PETITIONER •^v ..••-<^/:i-" .-•" < ^y y RESPONDENTS ^f.'Q'^ ,,^,,^rs.CG^ '"'^^^';.:> £:-:.tel ^:,^^^^ t'1' -Q Sainar Singh, S/o Shri Moharsai KEinwar, aged about ,.;''*''' 63 years, Retired Peon, Governinent Higher Secondary School, Barpali, R/o Village- Saraidih, Post Tilkeja, Via- Bhaisma, Disfrict-Korba (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2.' Joint Director Treasury, Account 8s Pension, Bilaspur Division, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3.' District Treasury Officer, Korba, District-Korba (C.G.) 4. Principal Government (Tribal Welfare Department) High School, Barpali, District-Korba (C.G.) L^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ART1CLE^26 QFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ssa s^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSQARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (3) No. 3235 c.f 200S PFTI Samaar Sinsh /^ ^ft .-fT^ ^ ^ y^ S'" ft ^TT1?^ RESPONDENTS State o'f Chhattisaarh & Others rit Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Sinale Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihofri, J. Prs'ss'nt'. Shri K.S,, Pswsf. counssl fof th6 Dstltionsr. Shri N.N. Rov, Panei Lawysrforthe State. ^r'%i-&£>s^iwg '-^/u lEii-a i ^c^y vi i" ^Sk/t Uisai ^', .e.^"'3 Vj With the ^ consent of iearned counsei heard finaliv. ss, tne This case pertains to grlevance of non-grant of retlrai dues. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, suamlls that the ma'tter msy be referred to the Pension Committee. Thls Court. in W.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattlsasr'n & others) and other connected matsers, dire Commiftee to considsr the matter of rstrial dues as frie dispute-d of Tacts were invoived. The Committes was constituted by Government, pursuant to the order dated 19-06-2006 ps W.P.No.1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. Stats Gover Chhattlsaarh and others), and oroer datsd 13-3-2008 ano others sted the question ^fff^ M.C.C. issed m Saiinath Mandai and another). Thus, this petltion i.s squarely covered by the judgmsnt and order dated 31s'' January, 2006 passed in W.P.No. 4642!2004 (Baijnath Manda! (supra) as submitted by iearned counse! appearlng for the parties. Gowri 4. This petitlon is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e., the office of the Advocate General is directsd to send the case to the Committee. within a period of 15 davs from the date of receiot of a CODV ofthis order. Thereafter, the Committee shaSI issue notice to ths petltioner and officers concerned within a I r" tee s sonsidsr and pass order, in accordance with iaw, after affording proper opponunity of hearina to the petitioner. The Detitioher and the officers concerned mav fiie sdditiona! a'ocuments, if necessan. The entjre exerejse, includina oavment of retirai dues, if anv. to the Detitioner, be compieted within a period of four months from ihe date of receiDt of a CODV of this order. The oelitioner shali suDDlv one comDiete sst of the oelit'on to the State counsel for transferrina the same to the Cornrnittee. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge