THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITIONNO.10967 OF 2010 05-05-2010 BETWEEN: C.S.R.SARMA COLLEGE, ONGOLE REPRESENTD BY ITS SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT, KARAVADI VENKATESWARLU S/O RAGHAVA RAO, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AND ANOTHER .. PETITIONERS AND THE GOVERNMENT OF A.P. REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD AND ANOTHER .. RESPONDENTS THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITIONNO.10967 OF 2010 O R D E R: This writ petition is directed against the show cause notice dated 13-4- 2010 issued by the 2nd respondent-Commissioner of Collegiate Education, Hyderabad, wherein the petitioner-college was called upon to show cause as to why action under Sub-Section 3(a) of Section 24 of A.P. Education Act, 1982 should not be taken against it. The petitioners have filed detailed replies and the latest reply being dated 22.2.2010, wherein a detailed explanation with regard to the doubts of 2nd respondent has been furnished. It is stated by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the proceedings are now pending with the 2nd respondent. In the writ petition the petitioners have also alleged that the very proceedings initiated proposing to take action against the correspondent is unauthorised. However, it is not necessary to go into all those details in view of the fact that the writ petition is directed purely against the show cause notice and the petitioner-college has given its replies and representations to the said show cause notice. Learned Government Pleader for Higher Education takes notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 and submits that the 2nd respondent will certainly consider the representations of the petitioner-college before taking any decision. In the facts and circumstances, the interests of justice would be met if the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the replies submitted by the petitioner-college, including the last reply dated 22.2.2010 as well as the material submitted in support thereof and pass appropriate and reasoned order in accordance with law. The petitioners seek an opportunity to file a detailed representation together with documents before the 2nd respondent. The petitioners, therefore, are granted ten days time from today to file a detailed representation with documents to enable the 2nd respondent to consider all the attending circumstances and pass appropriate and reasoned order thereon. The 2nd respondent shall also grant one opportunity of personal hearing to the Correspondent of the petitioner-college, consider all the representations and documents and take a reasoned decision. The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. 5th May, 2010. (JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR) Note: cc in three days. Tnb THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITIONNO.10967 OF 2010 5th May 2010.