IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 25TH JANUARY 2011 / 5TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 18582 of 2010(W) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- K. RAMAKRISHNAN, S/O. MADHAVI AMMA, KARAPURATH HOUSE, VAZHAKUMPARA, P.O.CHUVANNAMANNU, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 55 YEARS. BY ADV. SRI.JIJO PAUL RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PEECHI, THRISSUR. 4. SAJITH, S/O.SIVASANKARAN, KUNNUPURATH HOUSE, MOOKAMBIKA, SREESAKTHI APARTMENTS, KOTTAPURAM, POOTHOLE, THRISSUR- 01. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.T.K. ARAVINDKUMAR BABU. R4 BY ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN, SRI.RAJAN VELLOTH, SRI.SAIJO HASSAN, SRI.PRATHAP PILLAI, SRI.BENOJ C AUGUSTIN, SRI.RAFEEK. V.K., SRI.SEBIN THOMAS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/01/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 18582/2010-W APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S.NO.178/2010 IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, THRISSUR DATED 15/01/2010. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE I.A.NO.692/2010 IN O.S.NO.178/2010 IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, THRISSUR DATED 15/01/2010. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE COUNTER STATEMENT DATED 04/03/2010 FILED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN IN I.A.NO.692/2010 IN O.S. NO.178/2010. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15/01/2010 IN I.A.NO.692/2010 IN O.S.NO.178/2010 PASSED BY THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, THRISSUR. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 26/05/2010 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P (C) No.18582 of 2010 -------------------------- Dated this the 25th January, 2011 J U D G M E N T The only prayer sought by the petitioner is to direct the 1st respondent to take action on Ext.P5. Ext.P5 is a complaint made by the petitioner alleging that the 4th respondent is reclaiming the land mentioned therein in violation of the provisions under Act 28 of 2008. 2. If such a complaint has been made, it is for the 1st respondent to take action in the matter. This the 1st respondent shall do with notice to the petitioner and the 4th respondent. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible at any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the allegations raised. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ma /True copy/ P.A to Judge W.P (C) No. 2010 2