IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6808 of 2010. Decided on: 31.3.2011 Parveen Gupta ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others. ....Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. R.D. Kaundal, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) The petitioner has already made a representation for the redressal of his grievance. Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Assistant Advocate General submits that the case of the petitioner has been referred to the Government vide communication No. IPH ES-III-JEs- Seniority list (civil) Vol.-VIII/10-4731, dated 7.9.2010. However, the final decision is still awaited. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 1 to decide the representation made by the petitioner, in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order, within a period of two months after production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge March 31, 2011. (hl) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.