IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 11473 of 2005 BETWEEN: Pandeeti Nagamma, W/o P. Nagaiah, R/o Pedullapalli Village, B. Koduru Mandal, Kadapa District. ... PETITIONER AND 1 Chennu Palli Subbaiah @ Subbareddy @ Teacher Subbareddy, S/o Venkata Subbaiah, @ Pedda Venkata Subbareddy, aged 30 years, Occ: ST Teacher (District Resource Person) Working at Badvel Mandal, Education Office, R/o Peddulla Palli Village, B. Koduru Mandal, Kadapa District. 2 The District Collector, Kadapa, Kadapa District. 3 The District Educational Officer, Kadapa, Kadapa District. 4 The District Superintendent of Police, Kadapa, Kadapa District. 5 The Station House Officer, B.Koduru Police Station, B.Koduru, Kadapa District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of and writ of mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondents 2 to 5 in not considering petitioner's complaint representations, and also for not taking further action as per law against the 1st respondent in spite of the same matter being repeatedly brought to the notice of the higher officials of respondents, and on the other hand the respondents are forcing the petitioner to compromise with the 1st respondent consequently direct the respondents to provide justice to the petitioner herein by taking appropriate punitive action against the first respondent and other respondents who had shown undue favour to the first respondent by following due process of law and pass order or such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interests of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.S.A.SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.1: MR. L.J. VEERA REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: None appears for the petitioner and no counter is forthcoming. 2. I am of the opinion that the in view of the interim order passed by this Court on 17.05.2005, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ V. ESAWARAIAH, J July 3, 2008 DSK