IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.163 of 2011 Ramji Pd. Singh, S/o late Manoj Singh, retired Headmaster, Middle School, Narepur (Bachhawara west), Begusarai, resident of village + P.O.- Pahsara, P.S. Nawakothi, District- Begusarai. ….Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, father’s name not known, Commissioner- cum-Secretary, Primary, Secondary and Adult Education, Bihar, Patna. 3. Sri Ashok Kumar, father’s name not known to the petitioner, Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna. 4. Sri Yogesh Mishra, father’s name not known to the petitioner, District- Superintendent of Education, Begusarai. ……Opp. Parties. ----------- 06- 29.9.2011 This matter was called out yesterday when learned Assistant Counsel to Government Advocate No.I was present. In view of absence of learned counsel for the petitioner, it was passed over for today. None appears on behalf of the petitioner today again. Learned Assistant Counsel to Government Advocate No.1, is present. 2. This application under Article 215 of the Constitution of India, read with section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, has been filed by the petitioner of C.W.J.C. No. 8892 of 2000, for the alleged non-implementation of the judgment dated 7.9.2007, whereby the writ petition was allowed in part. The State Government was directed to grant one year’s extension to the petitioner with consequential benefits. 2 3. The contemners have placed on record their supplementary show-cause, wherein it is stated that one year’s salary with interest has been paid to the petitioner, and the Accountant General has been requested to enhance the post-retirement benefits of the petitioner after taking into account the extension of service of one year. It may incidentally be mentioned that the judgment in question has been upheld by a Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 6.5.2011, passed in L.P.A. No.870 of 2007. 4. In view of the position that the Accountant General has not been impleaded as party respondent, we are unable to issue any direction to him. In view of the statement made on behalf of the State Government that it has recommended to the Accountant General for enhancement of post-retirement benefits to the petitioner after taking into account the extension of service for a period of one year, it is expected that the Accountant General shall act without further loss of time. 5. This application is accordingly disposed of. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/