1 caw-1152-11 in wp-3829-08.sxw mmj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1152 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3829 OF 2008 Shri Dnyaneshwar Narayan Petkar ..Applicant Vs. Agricultural Produce Market Committee & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Vaibhav Gaikwad i/b Mr. A.M.Kulkarni for the Applicant Mr. Shrikant Chavan i/b Mr. Umesh Mankapure for Respondent No.1 CORAM:­ R.Y.GANOO, J DATED :­ JULY 5, 2011. P.C. 1 Heard the Learned Counsel for both the sides. 2 The Applicant claims that he should be appoint as clerk w.e.f 2000 with full backwages. As of today, he is working as peon in the office of Respondent No.1. The Respondent No.1 has passed an order dated 17­5­2010 so as to make some arrangement inter se thereby giving additional charge to certain employees who are presently working as Junior clerks. The Petitioner expects that this order should be stayed. According to the Petitioner if order dated 17­5­2010 is continued he will suffer prejudice. I am not inclined to accept the stand taken by the Applicant. The Applicant cannot make any grievance about some arrangement made by Respondent No.1 to run the office efficiently. Hence prayer clause (b) is required to be rejected. The aforesaid reasoning will equally apply for prayer clause (c). Hence prayer clause (c) is also rejected. So far as 2 caw-1152-11 in wp-3829-08.sxw Prayer clause (d) is concerned, I am inclined to observe that the Applicant is still working as peon with the Respondent No.1 and the Petition is of the year 2008. The request for early hearing is also rejected. 3 The Civil Application is dismissed. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)