1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1207 OF 2010 (Sau. Kamlabai Motiramji Bawane vs. Pandhari Jairam Lokhande & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. MARCH 12, 2010. Heard Shri Kothari, learned counsel for the petitioner. The temporary injunction to protect his alleged exclusive possession is concurrently rejected by the trial Court as also by lower appellate Court. The Courts have found that unregistered document is not sufficient to assist the plea of part performance under Section 53-A of Transfer of Property Act. It is further found that the petitioner has not derived any legal right to 91 R portion of suit property and that portion is inseparable from 1 H. 81 R. It is also noticed that in this situation, no temporary injunction could have been granted against co-owners. I do not find anything wrong with this concurrent findings recorded by the Courts below. However, considering the contention of Shri Kothari, learned counsel, liberty to the petitioner – plaintiff to move trial Court for expeditious disposal of Civil Suit. If such an application is filed and it is possible 2 for the trial Court, the trial Court may attempt to decide the suit itself as early as possible. Writ Petition is disposed of with these observations. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.