CRM-M No. 21845 of 2009 Sher Mohd. and another vs. State of Haryana Present: Mr. Sarfaraj Hussain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Deepak Girotra, AAG, Haryana. *** It is stated by learned Assistant Advocate General that though the petitioners presented the dowry articles yet delivery thereof was not taken by the complainant saying that they were old. In the circumstances in my opinion no useful purpose would be furthered by having the petitioners taken in custody. They are parents-in- law. In the circumstances interim order dated 11.8.2009 is made absolute, up to the filing of the challan, whereafter the petitioners would be required to seek regular bail. Petition stands disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE November 30, 2009 sunita