1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 8037/2010 Smt Shibti Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 27.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Vipul Jaiman - for the petitioner Mr GS Fauzdar - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner will furnish local surety if bail is granted. Petitioner is having child at the tender age. Petitioner will maintain good conduct and behaviour during period of bail, if granted. Looking to the aforesaid, petitioner is entitled for grant of bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on 2 bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and it is directed that accused-petitioner namely; Stm Shibti may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No.378/2010 registered at Police Station – Beawar City, Ajmer for offence under Section/s 379 IPC provided, she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with one local surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for her appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. It is, however, made clear that if the petitioner is found committing same or similar offence or any other type of offence during the period of bail then not only the prosecution would be at liberty to seek cancellation of this bail order but the Investigating Officer is also directed to inform about the same to this court if any case is registered. Copy of this order may be sent to the Investigating Officer concerned for necessary information and compliance if so required. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma