IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated 2.2.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.34583 of 2006 V.Venkatachalam ... Applicant -Vs.- 1.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Thiruvarur. 2.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Thiruvarur. 3.The Director of Elementary Education, College Road, Chennai – 6. .. Respondents Prayer: Original Application No.8873 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench praying to call for the records in pursuant to the impugned order passed by the 1st Respondent in proceeding No.mu.mu.No.581/92/A3 dated 26.2.98, quash the same and consequently direct the Respondents to fix the Scale of Pay of the Applicant as Rs.2,060/- with effect from 27.4.92 and consequently fix his Scale in corresponding Scale of Pay with arrears. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. For petitioner : Mr.S.M.Subramaniam For respondents : Mr.B.Vijay Government Advocate O R D E R Original Application No.8873 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench praying to call for the records in pursuant to the impugned order passed by the 1st Respondent in proceeding No.mu.mu.No.581/92/A3 dated 26.2.98, quash the same and consequently direct the Respondents to fix the Scale of Pay of the Applicant as Rs.2,060/- with effect from 27.4.92 and consequently fix his Scale in corresponding Scale of Pay with arrears. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. Though several reliefs were claimed in the Original Application, at the time of final hearing, leaned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the competent authority setting out the grounds for revision of scale of pay based on the factual aspects of the case and based on merits of the petitioner's claim. 3. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the larger relief sought for in the writ petition is rejected. The petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the competent authority within a month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the competent authority shall dispose off the same within two months thereafter. The writ petition is disposed off accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Asst. Registrar. /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar. vsm/ts To 1.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Thiruvarur. 2.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Thiruvarur. 3.The Director of Elementary Education, College Road, Chennai – 6 Order in W.P.No.34583 of 2006 KGK (CO) RH (24.2.10) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/