11V UIQ ELQHv CQQK’ILQX C§i§£Lll§§AiiHJ~BJ£A§£QK 1V£1££§Q§Q§QNQ 5073 0f200§ Petitioner Nand Lal Bagnel, S/o Shn‘ Dhanu Ram Baghel, Aged about 58 years, R/o Daldal Seoni, ES. Dhaxsiva, Distt, Raipur, Chhattisgmh. i Versus Respondents 1. Food Comozation 0 India, Through Managing Directar, haad Quarter ~ New Dclhi, 16—20 Balakham‘ba Lane, New Delhi. The Executive Director, Food Corporation of India, Diraj Anna Building, Near Anant Kanekar Police Station, Bandra (East), Mumbai — 40005 1 d. The General Manager, Food Cmporation of India, Ring Road Chouraha, Telibandha, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. The Area Manager, Food Corporation of India, Madeena Building, Jail Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5‘ The Employees Pmvident Fund Organization, Through - Commissioner, Regional Office, 8 & 9th Floor, Mayur Bhawan, Connaught Circus, New Delhi —1. diI .AKLTI m CONSTITUTII OW . DIA b Qi‘illib,‘ (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shn‘ ‘Pankaf's‘ii‘xivastavéfixdvoééiié‘ié;E113": 'gi'eeticger, Sbri B. P. Gupta, Advocate for the respondents No. 1 to 4. O R D E R (Passed on this 12m Day ofSeptember, 2008) 1. With the consent of learned counsel appealing for the parties, the matter is heard finally. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merits, except that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation in terms of the order dated 24. 10.2007, passed by this Com in wm Petition (S) No; aéee or2oo7 (J. P. Sahu 7‘ _ w Vs. Food Corporation oflndia & others). J.e: ’ ‘ Q i .— "L/ 3. Shri B. P. Gupta, learned counsel appean‘ng for the respondents No. 1 to 4 has no objection to the above submission made by learned counsel appealing for the petitioner. 4. ’l‘ne petition is accordmgiy disposed of m the same terms that the petitioner may tile a detailed representation before the respondent N0. 1 along with a copy of this Cider and a copy of the writ petition within a period of three weeks from today and if such a representation is filed and the concerned documents of the petitioner have not been forwarded by. the respondent I No.1 to me respondent No.5, the respondent No.1, in turn, shall examine the points raised by the petitioner and forwald the papers relating to the pension of the petitioner to respondent No.5 within a period of 75 days from the date of receipt of the said representation or shall disposed of the representation in accordance with law within the said period. 1n case, the concerned documents of the petitioner are already forwarded, this order shall carry no force. 5. 1n View ofthe foregoing, this petition stands disposed of. f\\ Sd/- [Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thaku: