THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.4919 of 2011 Dated 17th April, 2012 Between: Mohd.Khaleel …Petitioner and Shaik Iqbal and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Kolla Venkateswarlu Counsel for the respondents: --- The Court made the following: ORDER: This civil revision petition is filed against order, dated 24.06.2011, in I.A.No.283 of 2011 in O.S.No.25 of 2009, on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Khammam. The petitioner is defendant No.5 in the suit filed by respondent No.1 for partition of the suit schedule properties. Respondent No.6 herein filed I.A.No.283 of 2011 under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for his impleadment in the suit as defendant No.6. He has shown respondent No.1, who is the plaintiff, and respondent Nos.3, 4 and 5 who are defendant Nos.2, 3 and 4 respectively as respondents in the said application. The IA appeared to have undergone several adjournments. When the case was posted to 24.06.2011 as a last chance, no counter affidavit has been filed by any of the respondents. Therefore, they were set ex parte and the application filed by respondent No.1 herein was allowed. The petitioner has filed this civil revision petition with the grievance that he was not shown as respondent in I.A.No.283 of 2011 filed by respondent No.1. A perusal of the cause title in I.A.No.283 of 2011 shows that the petitioner is not shown as respondent in the said application. In ordinary course, such an omission would have been fatal. However, the petitioner being only a defendant in the suit, impleadment of a third party as co-defendant in the suit would not in any manner prejudice his interests. If at all, any one who would have felt aggrieved by such impleadment is only respondent No.1-plaintiff, who did not make any grievance by the impleadment of respondent No.6. In this view of the matter, I do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the lower Court. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the civil revision petition, C.R.P.M.P.No.6985 of 2011 shall stand disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 17th April, 2012 VGB