^-.^>x&tfc:. 'aa^ S a'<S&>. .(i?-. . U^Q'V^A < d; IE- 2IIE HISI GOURfP O? MHIIA NtU)3SH A2 J^B^LPUIl. Zn HEO* P32Tr?PION r?0» \<0[<J OP 1990 P3rm:!ELQN% .. ^ood. Oorporation^of India^a^ahara, iitistriG't Sa.ipzir), Ihrcy@ti l£e "Mstric-fc Hanager, 5'ood Corporatioa of India, Raipur» ' ' ' . ' RaSFO^Egm! ,. Muoiclpal Ooy^ncil, Ba^ahara, Bi.striot Kaipur, 'Piiro'ugh itg Ohief' BzeoutLTe Officer^- PBIISEON.TOIBH AH3IL02.E 226/227 OF ®3QOISaiL'KJSION OP INDIA, .' ^- ^'. ^ -^-A-^LA,'^.. ^ •.^•^: ^•^^^w-^^^ XJ-HC-78 *li*loi^TT^ ^uEf '-^i<4ic>^, y-al<<-i<i<o, RirtK-iy< ^^ ^. ni^/^o 5.1. ^200 3TT^5T??>Tf^;TIcy) HsnOT^^T^'qt^ JlNiniiinini' \.^ li. ,.< ^-^^ P^^~J M -f^ 3TT^$T ^PP ((3c|i^6|<£i) ^^TT^R ^rftcT 3TI^?T sartie 23-06-2005 Shri B.P. Gupta, i Shri Ranbir Singt|i Heard. By this petition.l imposition of Property the amount has been Shri Ranbir Sing( Section 139 and the Shri Gupta, that in viewof the appeal and liberiy be gr| The prayer is Marhas appearing for tl^ Accordingiy, ttie| with liberiy to the petjtf appropriate authority v^i order and on suchl petitioner/Food considered and decidecl law. In case grievance| the remedy available afresh. c.c . ^ounsel for the petitioner. Marhas, counsel for the respondent. the petitioner has challenged the Fax. During pendency of the petition d^posited. <PI<4lc>J1<1^l^0l'^f fe^t ^FJJ^I^ ^3rf^H3Tr^^T |i states thatappeal is provided under has not been filed. It be fited now. learrfed counsel for the petitioner submits obj^ction, he may be allowed to file an ^inted as time has lapsed. i|iot opposed by Shri Ranbir Singh <e other side. Ipetition is disppsed of as withdrawn :|oner to prefer an appeal before ttie tithin 15 days from the date of ttiis appeal being preferred by tiie Corpor^tion of India, the same shall be on ite own merits in accordance with still survives the petitioner may avail ui|ider the law indueling filir^ of petition Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge