IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17004 of 2011 Suresh Singh, Son of Chandradeo Singh, Resident of Village – Chorpokhar, English, Post – Ganj, Bharasara, P.S. – Dinara, District – Rohtas. ………….. Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Principle Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Director, Provident Fund Bihar, Patna. 5. The District Provident Fund Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram. 6. The District Education Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram. …………. Respondents ---------------------------------- 2 26.09.2011 Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.S. Pandey, learned AC to Additional Advocate General No. 7, who appears on behalf of all the Respondents. The petitioner, who retired as ‘In-charge Headmaster’ from ‘Balika Uchcha Vidyalaya, Ganj Bharasara, Rohtas’ with effect from 31.12.2009, has prayed for directing the Respondents particularly Respondent No. 5 to make payment of remaining amount of Provident Fund. It has been submitted that after retirement the petitioner has received all the retiral dues. Even he had received some amount under the head of G.P.F., but as per calculation of the petitioner entire payment has not been made in respect of Provident Fund for which the petitioner has also filed representation before the Respondent No. 5. Despite filing of representation, neither the grievance has been redressed nor representation has been disposed of. In view of the facts and circumstances, the writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh detailed representation before the Respondent No. 5/District 2 Provident Fund Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram, within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, the Respondent No. 5 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If the Respondent No. 5 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, the Respondent No. 5 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within three months from the date of filing of such representation. The writ petition stands disposed of. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)