IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2185 of 2009 SMT.SURJI DEVI & ANR Versus ANIL THAKUR & ANR ----------- 2. 30.6.2010 The application has been filed for restoration of C. R. No.111/2006 which has been dismissed for default due to non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 12.7.2007. In the restoration application the ground has been taken that the daily cause list could not be marked on account of which the civil revision stood dismissed for default on 19.7.2007. The said ground itself shows a complete non-application of mind and in no case the same can be considered to be a correct one. By the said order dated 12.7.2007, this Court on the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner had granted one week’s time to comply with the order dated 15.5.2007 of the Lawazima Board. Earlier also on 15.5.2007 on the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner the Lawazima Board had granted time till one week after summer vacation to take steps for fresh service of notice on opposite party Nos. 1 and 2 respectively. In the aforesaid view of the matter on both the occasions, learned counsel for the - 2 - petitioner was present before the Lawazima Board and this Court and thus non-marking of the daily cause list cannot be the reason for the matter getting dismissed, rather it is a clear cut case of repeated laches on the part of learned counsel for the petitioner and it cannot be condoned on the false ground given in the restoration application. The application is, accordingly, dismissed. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )