IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. SUIT SUIT SUIT No.63 of 1989 No.63 of 1989 No.63 of 1989 Pinky Kumar Sarkar & Anr ..Plaintiffs. Vs. Kumar Sakerchand Sarkar ..Defendant. Mr M.V. Jaykar, Advocate for the Plaintiff. Mr P. V. Mahadik i/b Haresh Mehta & Co. Advocate for the Defendant. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C. DAGA,J. V.C. DAGA,J. V.C. DAGA,J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 10.01.2008. 10.01.2008. 10.01.2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Since the plaintiff no.1 has attained majority, leave to amend granted. Plaintiffs are directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause title of the plaint forthwith. 2. Plaintiffs alongwith their Advocate are present in person. The defendant is represented through Advocate. Parties to the suit have settled their dispute out of the Court. The terms of settlement are drawn in the form of consent terms dated 10-1-2008. They are duly signed by the plaintiffs and Advocate for the defendant. The consent terms are taken on record and marked Exh."X" for identification. 3. Parties to the suit have jointly prayed that decree in terms of consent terms dated 10th January, 2008 signed by the parties, be passed. 4. The suit stands decreed in terms of consent terms. 5. Parties to bear their own costs. 6. Decree be drawn up accordingly. (V.C. (V.C. (V.C. DAGA,J) DAGA,J) DAGA,J)