IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 9666 of 2011-G. Decided on: 15th November, 2011. Deepa Sharma. ….Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & another. … . Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Neeraj K. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “(i) That respondents may kindly be directed to post the petitioner in District Kangra from the initially date of appointment without consequential benefits including senesity. (ii) That the respondents may be ordered to grant same relief as granted to Amit Thakur in CWP No. 7667/11 with connected matters on 20th Oct. 2011 or any other relief which may deem fit. 2. The petitioner submits that she may also be given the benefit of the judgment, Annexure P-2. It is for the petitioner to make an appropriate representation before the second respondent, in case she is similarly situated as the petitioner covered by the judgment, Annexure P-2, referred to above. In the event of the petitioner filing representation within two weeks, needful action shall be taken in the light 2 of the judgment referred to above within one month thereafter from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment, referred to above, by the petitioner. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 15th November, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr) Judge.