IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 795 of 2008 Saurabh Mehta S/o Hans Raj Mehta. ......... Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. .......... Respondents Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted the chargesheet against the petitioner & other accused persons before the Circle Officer concerned on 11.11.2008 and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit the chargesheet before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 23.10.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 02.12.2008 V.K