THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 6842 OF 2008 Dt: 31st March 2008 Between: Shaik Mirabhee …Petitioner and The District Collector, Visakhapatnam-cum- District Programme Coordinator, N.R. Employment Guarantee Scheme, Visakhapatnam & others …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 6842 OF 2008 O R D E R: The petitioner states that she submitted an application on 12.12.2007 to the 2nd respondent, for being appointed as Village Resource Person, for implementation of National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, and on being selected, she was also sent for training. It is stated that when she was expecting orders of appointment, on completion of training, the 2nd respondent has appointed the 3rd respondent, under the influence of the local MLA and MPTC, though the application of 3rd respondent was made on 3.3.2008, the petitioner claims to have filed appeal before the 1st respondent on 10.3.2008, against the appointment of the 3rd respondent, together with an application for stay. Her grievance is that no orders have been passed, either on the application for stay, or in the appeal, and accordingly, seeks appropriate direction. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. The petitioner states that the post in question was reserved in favour of B.C-B candidates; she has been selected by the 2nd respondent, and sent for training. As of now, the procedure to be followed, in the matter of appointment, or for that matter, the number and nature of vacancies in the concerned post, are not before this court. The petitioner has already approached the 1st respondent, by pleading necessary facts. The 1st respondent has to call for the records relating to the appointment of the 3rd respondent, and pass appropriate orders, either on the application for stay, or in the appeal itself. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the 1st respondent to pass appropriate orders on the appeal preferred by the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from today, duly issuing notice of hearing to the 3rd respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ 31st March 2008 PAN