1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C. A.(S) No. 373 OF 2009 (In S.A. No. 595/06) Sanjay Bapurao Gaikwad v. Pratap Tukaram Gaikwad & ors. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's and Registrar's orders orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. C.S. Kaptan Advocate for the appellant/applicant. Mr. R.R. Srivastava Advocate for the Respdt. 1 & 2. Mrs. A.Palsodkar advocate for Res. 4 to 8. ..... CORAM: A.B.CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 26 th JUNE, 2009. This is an admitted appeal and during the course of final hearing, present application has been filed by the parties to the appeal. The applicant as well as non-applicants are present before the Court. Parties are identified by their respective counsel for the appellant and respondents. Statements made in the application for recording compromise are acceptable to the parties to the present appeal and they are agreeable for such 2 compromise, as is stated in the said application. As the parties to the appeal are all close relatives, the proposed compromise can be accepted. Hence, in view of the above, application for recording compromise under Order 23 Rule 3, Code of Civil Procedure, is accepted and same is allowed in terms of prayer made in this application. Compromise decree may be drawn accordingly. Second Appeal is therefore disposed of in terms of the application for compromise. No costs. JUDGE /TA/