IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.21615 of 2001 Between: Chada Shankaraiah, S/o Papaiah, R/o Manakondur (Post & Mandal), Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Karimnagar District, Karimnagar. 2 The District Educational Officer, Karimnagar District, Karimnagar. 3 The Additional Project Co-ordinator, District Primary Education Project(D.P.E.D) Office, Karimnagar. 4 The Chairman, School Education Committee, Government Central Primary School (G.P.S), Kaman road, Kisan Nagar, Karimnagar. 5 Yeluguri Narayana, S/o Rajalingam, R/o H.No. 6-3-338, Kisan Nagar, Karimnagar (Post & District). .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the impugned letter bearing Lr.Dy.E.E./CW/DEEP/2001 dated 9.10.2001 issued by the First Respondent herein as illegal, arbitrary, un-reasonable and violative of Article 14 and 300- A of Constitution of India besides principles of natural justice and equity and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents Nos. 1 to 4 herein not to proceed with the construction of school building over my land bearing Survey No.61 admeasuring 520 sq. yds., in Kisan Nagar at Karimnagar as stated pending the O.S. No 116 of 1996 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge at Karimnagar in the interest of Justices and equity and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.RAMACHANDAR RAO VEMUGANTI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.21615 of 2001 ORDER: When the matter has been taken up for hearing on 21-04-2008, none appeared for the petitioner and accordingly, the matter was directed to be deleted from the caption “for orders” and was directed to be posted after summer vacation. Today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing, neither learned counsel for the petitioner is present nor is there any representation on his behalf. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 17-06-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KKG}