IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12504 of 2010 NIRANJAN SINGH, SON OF LATE ANIRUDH SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 10.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution case is that the accused persons numbering about 14 lobbed Bomb on the house of the Informant on account of which his son and wife lost their lives. The reason for the occurrence was that the petitioner had sent word through Brahmdeo Singh and Nageshwar Singh that if the Informant does not withdraw the earlier case of kidnapping instituted by him, he would suffer dire consequences. The submission of the counsel for the petitioner is that Brahmdeo Singh and Nageshwar Singh through whom the petitioner had allegedly sent word were not charge sheeted by the Police as also that the petitioner was charge sheeted in only one of the cases of kidnapping. Considering the nature of allegations as also that eleven witnesses have already been examined during trial, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)