WP(C) 4219/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE H. BARUAH. Heard Mr. S. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.R. Pathak, lea rned standing counsel, Education Department. Since Mr. Pathak has accepted notice on behalf of all the respondents, no formal notice need be issued. As agreed to by the learned counsel for both the parties, this matter is taken u p for final disposal at the motion stage. In the writ petition, the petitioner herein states that his father Late Gunadhar Adhikary was working as Head Teacher in 2388 No. Namdhar L.P School, Ujan Petla . While he was serving in the said school, he expired on 01-12-2004 leaving behi nd his other family members. However, after death of his father, his mother file d an application before the respondent authority for appointment of her elder so n, namely, Probin Adhikary to the post of Assistant Teacher under Die-in-Harness scheme, but the appropriate authority till date has not taken any decision with regard to the claim of the petitioner. Mr. S. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner by referring to the case of Ac hyut Ranjan Das & Ors Vs. State of Assam & Ors, reported in 2006 (4) GLT 674 con tends that this court while disposing of the batch of writ petitions of the iden tical nature formulated some guidelines for disposal of the applications for app ointment on compassionate ground. The learned counsel has also placed reliance o n the decision of this court rendered in Faziron Nessa & Ors Vs. State of Assam & Ors, reported in 2010 (4) GLT 340, wherein the view adopted in Achyut Ranjan D as & Ors has been reiterated. Since the mother of the petitioner on account of death of her husband filed an a pplication before the appropriate authority to appoint her son (petitioner herin ) on compassionate ground, the same also requires disposal by the appropriate au thority following the guidelines as provided in Achyut Ranjan Das & Ors (supra). In that view of the matter, this Court also directs the respondent authority to dispose of the application/representation submitted by the mother of the petitio ner remaining within the parameters of the guidelines as formulated by this cour t in the case of Achyut Ranjan Das & Ors(supra). It is informed at the Bar that the District Level Committee meeting will be held in the month of December, 2010 and this being the information as provided, it i s directed that the respondent authority shall consider the same in the District Level Committee meeting to be held in the month of December, 2010. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed o f.