1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.117 OF 2010 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.392 OF 2009 Shridhar M. Shetty ...Applicant. v. Sarladevi Surajnarainkanav ....Respondent. Smt. Sushama Singh, adv. for the Applicant. CORAM : J.H.Bhatia, J. DATE : 1st October, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard. The Civil Revision Application No.392 of 2009 was dismissed for the non-compliance of the conditional order of service on the respondents within the stipulated period. However, affidavit has been filed by the learned counsel of one Pradeep Pednekar, clerk of the advocate alongwith copies of two letters addressed to the respondents. Respondents had actually received said notice on 8.8.2009 and 26.8.2009, i.e., much before the returnable date. Therefore, this application is allowed and Civil Revision Application No.392 of 2009 is restored to the file. 2 Application stands disposed off. 2 3 Civil Revision Application be listed on 20.10.2010 for admission. (J.H.BHATIA, J.) 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.118 OF 2010 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.393 OF 2009 Shridhar M. Shetty ...Applicant. v. Sarladevi Surajnarainkanav ...Respondent. Smt. Sushama Singh, adv. for the Applicant. CORAM : J.H.Bhatia, J. DATE : 1st October, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard. The Civil Revision Application No.393 of 2009 was dismissed for the non-compliance of the conditional order of service on the respondents within the stipulated period. However, affidavit has been filed by the learned counsel of one Pradeep Pednekar, clerk of the advocate alongwith copies of two letters addressed to the respondents. Respondents had actually received said notice on 3.8.2009 and 26.8.2009, i.e., much before the returnable date. Therefore, this application is allowed and Civil Revision Application No.393 of 2009 is restored to the file. 4 2 Application stands disposed off. 3 Civil Revision Application be listed on 20.10.2010 for admission. (J.H.BHATIA, J.)