IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14066 of 2010 Dr. Nimala Chaudhary & others .....Petitioners VERSUS Bhagat Phool Singh Mahila Vishwa Vidiyalaya, Khanpur Kalan, Distt. Sonepat and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. R.K. Malik, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Kohal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Manik Bakshi, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2. None for respondent No.3. Mr. SS Patter, DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Counsel for the respondents has placed before me a Division Bench judgment passed in CWP No.9665 of 2010, (Prof. S.S. Bindra and others Versus The State of Punjab and others), decided on 4.3.2011, where similar challenge seeking enhancement in the age of 65 years has been declined. Accordingly, the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the Division Bench judgment referred to above. This fact is not disputed by the counsel for the petitioners. In the light of law laid down by this Court in Prof. SS Bindra's case (supra), the present writ petition is dismissed. April 26, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH) monika JUDGE