61^ "~S^r^ ^__§ii^Ui ;!i, • -.^^ ii IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR_(CJ&.I (''<' W.P. No....,..^..^.^,..,../20p7 PETITIONERS: ^ .••'\i? ^-17 Kulu Ram Kashyap S/o Shri Maan sai Kashyap, Aged 38 year's Working as Asst. Teacher (Tribal Department) at Govt. Primary School, Sargipal, R/o Village-Post ^••"'J<s'0.' "Mx' /^^ .-y^y ^" »'•' .r^ •^T<' G"<1'<, )<';\^> RESPONDENTS ,/!^ / Karidgaon , Bakawand Distt. Bastar (C.G.) ^-i(L^'./ 2^ Smt. Gurmeet Thakur W/o Shree Laxinan Singh Thakur Aged 40 years, Working as Asst. Teacher atPriraary School Kumharpara, R/o Village-Post Revavand, Dist. Bastar. 3. Smt. Poonam Pataayak W/o shri Suresh Kumar Pataiayak, Aged 43 years, working as Asst. Teacher at Primary School Kosradongri, R/o Pahurvel, Jagdalpur Dist. Bastar VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretaiy Tribal Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) '^~' .*• ^ 2. Asst. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare -'^ Departa&^lt, Jagdalpur Dist. BastarfC.G.) ^•f. 3. Commissioner, Raipur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OR THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER OF LIKE NTURE ETC:- HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P. No. 653 of 2007 Petitioners : Kulu Ram Kashyap and others Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Present: r. Manoj Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners. lAs. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. OR DER (Passed on this 5rt Doiy of February, 2007) 1. Leamed counse\ appearing for the petitioners as well as for tiie State/respondents jointly submit that the facts of the present writ petition are similar to that of in W. P. (5) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiuwri caid others vs. State Sovemment of Chhattisgarh & others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. They fur-ther submit that the question of law involved is also the same. ThakUr 2. In view of the above-stated submissions made by learned counselfor the parties, the writ petition is allowed in terms of -the order dated 7.11.2006 passed by this Court in W.P. (5.) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari cmd others vs. State Sovernment of Chhattisgarh <& ol+iers). No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge r