eLf>^>^ IN THE mGH COURT OF CmiATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. /•3// /2086- °/ WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF DSnDIA. PETITIONER rf,-.--' . ^Sf^)^- ^^^^" y6' .&••••" ,»&' RESPONDENTS tcE^S0-co^ \^ o& ^.t.^" ^w&-v 2. ^ Baliram Bhagat, son of Shri Tembwa Ram Bhagat, aged about 41 years, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Primary School Galaunda, Jashpur Nagar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The District Education Officer, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 01. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISSARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S\ No. 117 of 2007 Petitioners : AAnnsingh Iflwnde ond others Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-is9arh and others W. P.(S) No. 118 of 2007 Petitktners ; Tejnun Bha9at and others Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond others W. P.(S\ No. 121 of 2007 Petitioner : Sanjoy Kunwr Sinhu Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh and another W. P.(S\ No. 126 of 2007 Petitioner : Bhuvneshwar Prosad Pracyian Versus Respondents : State of ChhaniS9arh and o-thers W. P.fS) No. 127 of 2007 Petitioner : Kulranjon Ekka Verais Respondents : State of Chhatt-is9arh and others W P.(S) No. 128 of 2007 Petitkmer : Smt. Bharti Bai Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond cnother W. P.(S) No. 129 of 2007 Petitioner : Philos Akshcy Mukut Tigga Versus Req?ondents : State of Chhat»iS9arhond ono-ther W. P.fS) No. 130 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Prasadi Bhagat Versus Reqiondents : S-tate of Oihattisgarh and another ^ W. P.(S\ No. 131 of 2007 Petitioner : Sa9ar Sai Versus Respondents : State of ChhattiS9arh and others W. P.(S} No. 133 of 20)7 Petitioner : Inus Bek Versus Respondents : State of ChhatfriS9arh and orwther W. P.(S\ No. 134 of 2007 Petitioner : Btiliram Bhagat Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and onother W. P./S) No. 135 of 2007 Petitioner : Avinosh Chandra Xak» Versus ftespondents : Stcrte of Qrhattisysrh and others W. P./S) No 136 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Shashifcala Bhagat Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarhand another W. P.(S\ No. 137 of 2007 Petitioner ; Chhanduram Bh<>9at Versus Respondents : Storte of Chhatt-isgarh and another W. P.(S) No. 139 of 2007 Petitioner : Ku. Clementma Ti99a Versus Respondents : State of Oihatt-isgarh and anolher W. 9.(S\ No. 1- of 2007 Petitioner : Krishna Ram Patel Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt'is9arh and others r W. P.fS^No. 147 of 2007 Petituner : Laxminaroyan Patel Versus Respondents : State of ChhattiS9arh and another W. P.fSl No. 149 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. AAaxi Miliyoni Toppo Versus Ke^ondents ; State of Chhatt-isgarh ond anolher W. P.fS)No. 150of2007 Petitioner : Smt. Rajmoni Versus Respondents ; S-tate of Chhattisgarh and others W. P.(S) No. 151 of 2007 Petitioner : Chamru Ram Nogdeo Versus Respondents : StoAe of Chhattisgarh and others W. P.fSl No. 159 of 2007 Petitioner : Sonesh Ram Pradhan Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-iqarh ond another W. P.fS) No. 161 of 2007 Petitioner : Chhotekil Khanna Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another W. P.fS) No. 165 of 2007 Petitioner : Ramkumar ChoucBwri Versus Respondents : 5-tate of Chhattisgarh ondanother And W. P.rS) No. 168 of 2007 Petitioner : Brijmohan Nayak Versus Respondents : State of Chhatlisgarh ond onolher SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice ScHsh K. Agnihatri, J Present; Mr. A.N. Bhakla, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mrs. Anju Ahuju, Deputy Sovemment Advocote, Mr. Arvind Oubey, Panel Lawyer, Ms. Sunita Jain. Ponel Lawyer for the respondents/State. OR&ER passed on -this 17th Duy of January, 2007) 1. Laamed counsel oppeoring for -the petitioners as well us for the State/respondents jointly submit 1hat •the facts of the present writ petitions ans similar to -that of in W. P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. State fiovemment of Chhattisgarh A others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. They further submit that the question of l<u»involved is also thesame. 2. In view of the ddsove-stated submissions made by leamed counsel for "the parties, these writ petitions are allowed m terms of the order cfated 7.11.2006 pasaed by this Court in WP. (5.) No. 5976/2006 (Sudiil Ti>wri ond others vs. State Sovemment of Chhatrtsgarh & others). No order as to costs. SiAhotfh 3. A copy of -this order be placed on record in o'ther connected writ petition. ~~—~—— ~ Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge