IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15739 of 2009 1. MAHENDRA PRASAD SAH @ MAHENDRA PRASAD 2. KAUSHLYA DEVI --------- Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 14.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. In the case petitioners have been alleged for demanding dowry and causing of cruelty followed by other allegations in which the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that ultimately the complainant was residing with her husband at Jalandhar which she admits in her S.A. in course of inquiry that the demand was being made by her husband and that also due to matrimonial differences of day to day affairs but in any case, in my view also petitioners’ arrest cannot be justified. I agree with the submission. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today, the above named two petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two - 2 - sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in Complaint Case No. 944C of 2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI