IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15012 of 2011 CHANDRA KISHORE JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 23.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. It would appear from perusal of the impugned order that earlier the petitioner was on bail but he jumped bail on 11.09.2003. Subsequently, he could be remanded in case on 22.02.2011 and since then he is languishing in jail custody. It would further appear that when the bail bonds of the petitioner was cancelled; the case had been fixed for appearance of other co-accused. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that being a poor labourer, the petitioner had gone outside the state in connection with his livelihood and when he returned to his village, he was remanded in the present case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Chandra Kishore Jha be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Dalsingsarai P.S. Case No. 185 of 1989 corresponding to Trial No. 402 of 2011 to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Dalsingsarai subject to condition that one of the sureties must be close relative of 2 the petitioner as well as holder of landed property and furthermore, the petitioner shall attend the court below on each and every date in person for a period of one year and if he fails to do so, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)