In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh F.A.O. No. 3093 of 2008 Date of decision: August 10, 2009 Shabnam .. Appellant Vs. Major Sartaj and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. J.S. Cooner, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. M.B. Jain, Advocate for the respondent No.3. A.N. Jindal, J There were two claim petitions namely Pooja vs. Major Sartaj and Shabnam vs. Major Sartaj, which were decided by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Panchkula, vide order dated 8.4.2008, whereby the claim set up by Pooja was partly allowed, whereas, the claim set up by Shabnam was dismissed The crucial question involved in the appeal is that if the claim qua Pooja could be accepted then why the claim set up by Shabnam be not accepted. In this regard, it may be observed that the sine qua non for fastening the liability was to prove the injuries and the amount spent by the claimant for treatment. The claimant in order to establish the injuries suffered by her did not examine any doctor to prove any medicolegal report, bed head ticket or much less prescription slip. No evidence has been led in order to prove if she suffered any injury or spent anything over the injuries suffered by her during the accident. As such, the Tribunal was justified in dismissing her claim petition. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed August 10, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge