xl HEGH COUR? GF CHHATTE$QA§H AT EiLQSPwR $mg§e ganch : Han’Me ML Jusmm Pa'itmkey §iwake¥ Writ Pemian £22?) Na. 6412 Qf 261w 3‘ The State of Chhattisgarm Thmugh n»“~AL vuuuUtGi', I n u§$u. £l daiijgil‘ g unai‘i'wa I"k (as) an“ 6L": ny'u«L‘mA‘A--. rumlpunum l/nmn num'ai' f1 rater, I. i CGUf‘ISEI l £1w ggggggggggg mapunuums .I. hi Ni}. 1 and 2. Shri Vivek Sharma; ceunsei for respondent No. 3fState. WRET PETiTiON UNDER ARTECLE 22? OFTHE CainJsTg-rw I Ivlu VI :i‘iuif‘§ Shri Parag Kotechai counse! forthe petitioners. GRDER !’)h fKA Qfh‘Xr“ \4?.U"f.4—UUO} - With thé consentof the parties; matter is heard fnaiiy. i Challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated V 22.10.2008 oaseed by Additionai District Judge. Shekti. District Janigir Chamoa, in Misc. Civii Appee! No.14f2008 whereby the application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 of the code of Civii Procedure as filed by respondents/defendants No. 1 and 2 have been aliowed. PET!T!ONER$ ’i. Mongra Bai; aged about 43 years, rlaillunb El m‘:£S- we "\l ‘3, buunu .II‘ wizanSiy-a, NI. 2. Thandaram; SJO Budhu Ghansiy‘a, aged abaut 45 yeam, Both are R/o viiiaga Saposez 1h “kgl-L...‘ unauma, r1:.-.‘$ Ulau. umqgu I...‘5_.:.. ”ka unam$é 1" Versus RESPONDENTS ‘ 1. Mangii Bai; Wjo Temial; Aged about na£-».!-nd. uemuuanzS ti: .'... av yuai‘S. 2. Temiali Slo Dauiairami Both aye resparxdent, R/G vmage Sapose, Tah. Dhabhra; Distt‘ Jan}gir-Champa If‘ 1" x \V-‘J-i This Cm a whiiey etertainia nrg the p’resent'writ petvition h as passed the interi order ae 2 .1. 1 200 drectig the parties t9 m did 1 $ in maintain status q rpec of the possession, of ie suit iand. ua 'm sst h Cousel f e pariies very iairi ssedes that the order n or th y en if 0 status qu sntine and te. uit its is cte within t f o ous h s etf dedd he stiutate time; then’’ne iii have no obition. pd ty w ec Leaking to the ry fair submissin the parties, triai ve o of Court is directed to decide te sui itself ithin eriod of six mnths rm th date o rcet of copy of this order, Tm then staus quo s ranted by this our to contiue. t a g Ct n it ould be he duy of the pais to appriz the ct w t t tte e our beiow aout the rder 'o this court. Neeles o state that both b o f ds t the artes wit! o—operate for ear disposai 0t th it and no pi c ly e su unnecessa gournmnt ud soughtf by the parties. With the above observaton; e petition tand disposed of. i I/ggi/L/ Sdl- Pri i ‘ I tinker Diwaker i : Ju h t w e p o fo e f eip ry ade woi he or i th ss i l