1 12 cra 577.09.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION srk CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.577 OF 2009 Handicrafts and Handloom Export Corporation of India Ltd. ..Applicant. v/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents. .... Ms. Usha Srivastav i/b M/s Consulta Juris for the Applicant. Mr. S.N.Garode, AGP for Respondent no.1. Mr. Suhas Bhalekar i/b Ms. Ranjane Parikh for Respondent no.2. .... CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 26TH AUGUST, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Both the courts below have held that the Applicant, who is the original Defendant, being a Government Company having a capital of more than One Crore is not entitled to protection under the Maharashtra Rent Act and passed the decree for eviction in favour of the Plaintiff/Respondent No.2 and against the Defendants. The learned counsel for the Defendants makes a statement that in 2 12 cra 577.09.doc view of the legal position she will not press the Revision Application but will make a request for time of four months to vacate the premises. Learned counsel for the Plaintiff/Respondent No.2 has no objection to grant four months time. 2 Therefore, the Revision Application stands disposed of as not pressed. However, the decree for eviction shall not be executed till 31st December, 2010 subject to the Defendants filing an undertaking before this Court on usual terms to vacate the premises and to hand over peaceful possession of the same to the Plaintiff on or before 31st December, 2010. 3 In case, the undertaking is not filed within two weeks, the Plaintiff shall be entitled to execute the decree. [ J.H.BHATIA, J. ]