CWP (T) No. 7481/2008 1.9.2009:Present: Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. A.G. for the respondents. In similar case i.e. CWP (T) No. 8000 of 2008 titled as Smt. Subhadra Rana versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another, it has come in the reply that the services of the petitioner arrayed therein shall not be terminated. CWP (T) No. 8000/2008 was decided on 14.5.2009. The following directions were issued in CWP (T) No. 8000/2008: “It has been undertaken by the respondent-State in the reply that the petitioner’s services shall not be terminated. As far as the case of the petitioner for regulation is concerned, the same shall be considered by the respondent-State as and when any scheme is framed”. The facts of the present case are same or similar as that of Subhadra Rana’s (supra) case. Consequently, the interest of justice will suffice, if same directions as issued in case of Subhadra Rana’s are issued to the respondents in the present case also. Accordingly, the respondent-State is directed not to terminate the services of the petitioner and to explore the possibility of regularization of the petitioner as and when any scheme is framed. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 1, 2009. *awasthi*