IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1032 of 2011 1. VIJAY KUMAR PASWAN SON OF LATE BIRENCHI PASWAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DILAWARPUR, P.O. AND P.S. BIHTA DISTRICT PATNA, AT PRESENT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KORIAM CHAUK, P.O. BARA, P.S. + DISTRICT ARWAL. 2. RAJENDRA PRASAD SON OF LATE KEDAR PRASAD RESIDENT OF MOHALLA LANGAR TOLI GALI, (NALA ROAD) HOUSE OWNER ARUN MAHTO P.O.+P.S. KADAM KUAN, DISTRICT PATNA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. MR. VIJAY KUMAR KUMAWAT THE ADMINISTRATOR, BIHAR STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAWAN, PATNA, BIRCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA. ---------------------------------- 03. 26.08.2011 In compliance of the order of the High Court dated 27.08.2010 the Administrator, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Patna has passed reasoned order bearing Memo No.1572 dated 15.03.2011 refusing to reinstate the petitioners as according to the Administrator consideration in departmental proceeding is probability of circumstance, whereas in criminal trial prosecution has to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt and in the light of such observation of the Administrator, the case of the petitioner for reinstatement has been rejected. Counsel for the petitioner, however, disputes such finding as according to him under the order of the trial court, the occurrence itself was disbelieved. If that be so petitioner should challenge the order dated 15.03.2011 by filing another writ petition. The contempt petition is, accordingly disposed of. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)