1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1991 OF 2010 Vilas S/o.Eknath Lande APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT Mr.A.S.Usmanpurkar, learned counsel for applicant. Mr.D.V.Tele, learned APP for State CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J. DATE : 11/06/2010 PER COURT : 1. By the present application, the applicant has approached this Court for his release on bail in connection with CR No.47/2010, registered in Ambad Police Station of Dist. Jalna for the alleged offence punishable u/s. 307, 147, 148, 149, 504 of The IPC and u/s. 135 of The Mumbai Police Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned APP for State. Also perused the papers of investigation till carried out. 3. The alleged offence came to be registered on the complaint of one Ganesh Damodar Pachphule, who was working as a Manager on the Dhaba, situated on Ambad Road. In the night of 08/03/2010, 2 one Gangadhar and his friends had been to the said Dhaba to take dinner. After the dinner, when bill was presented, there was alternation of words on the count of difference in the amount of bill, hence the Manager insisted to pay the whole bill about the dinner taken by them. At that time, Gangadhar and his friends went away from the Dhaba and returned after some minutes and at that time, the present applicant was also with them, holding iron rod in his hand. Gangadhar assaulted the complainant with the iron rod, and others surrounded the Manager. Considering this aspect, as there is participation of applicant as a member of unlawful assembly, armed with deadly weapons, there can not be a false implication of applicant in this crime. 4. In the premise, no case is made out to release the applicant on anticipatory bail. Application sans any merit, hence rejected. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/JUNE 2010/cri-appl-1991-10