1 84caf-604and907.11 Ash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 604 OF 2011 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 907 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1483 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri Vivek Salunke i/by Shri P.B. Shah for the Applicants. Ms Nitu Sandhya i/by Shri Prakash Mahadik for the Respondent. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 24TH MARCH, 2011 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. These are applications under Rule 7 of Order XXXII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking permission to enter into compromise on behalf of the minors Akshay and Anuja. Perused the consent terms which are styled as Minutes of the Order duly signed by the parties. Perused the Advocate’s certificates annexed to both the Applications. Perusal of the consent terms shows that interests of minor daughter and minor son of the Respondent are adequately protected. Perusal of the 2 84caf-604and907.11 Clauses 5 to 7 shows that the share of the minors in the properties has been adequately protected. As regards the other properties, clauses 8 and 9 take care of the interests of the minors. Paragraph 10 of the consent terms provides for investment of fixed deposit of Rs.1 lakh made in the name of the minors. Clause 11 thereof takes care of the facility granted for meeting the minor son and daughter. The consent terms have been signed by the Advocates appearing for the parties. As the compromise appears to be in the interest of the minors, both the Applications deserve to be allowed in terms of Clause (a) and accordingly the said Applications are allowed in terms of the prayer clause (a). (A.S.OKA, J)