tf •r' ^ ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATISHGARH AT BILASPUR. C.G. W.P.(SINO. ^9)A^7 2010 Petitioner f Manbhautin aged 61 years Daugther of Hari Manikpurl, Female Labourer (work charge) \^r^'^^ Under S.D.O P.W.D. 2, Durg. Resident of New Aadarsh nagar, Gaitri nagar, Potiakala, Durg C.G. Respondents Versus 1. »<• The State Govt. of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, Public Work Department Ministry, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C/G.) 2/ Sub Divisional Officer, P.W.D., Up-Sambhag No.2, Durg D!sn " .Dui Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of Mandamus/direction oranv other aDDropriate writ. ,,^.c HiGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BILASPUR WRiT PETiTION (S)l N0. 2877 OF 2010 Petitioner Versus Respondents Ma!nbhautin The State Govt. of Ch'hattfegarh & .Another WRiT PETiTtON UNDER ARTICLE 226|OF THE CONSTITUTION OF JNDIA (SB : Hon'bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Somkant Verma, Adv^catefor the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. GRDERSfORAU (Passed onthjs 08tnday ofAprii,2011) 1. Learned ^ounsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the ease, being payment of retiral benefrts matter, may be referred to the pensipn committee. 2. This Coyrt, in the matterofW.P. Np. 4642/2004 (Ss/jna^? Mandaf v. The State of Chhattisgaiii & p^ers) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed questlon of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to theorder dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Sm^ Keja Bal Chandrakar v. State Government and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in IVi.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhatfisgarh & Others v. Baljnath Mandal and anothei'). Thus, this petitSon is squarejy covered by the judgment and order dated 31st of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642120Q4 Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by iearned counset appearing for the parties. 3. This petition is accordingiy disposed of in the same terms i.e. the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a '.IV ashok 4. GQpy of the petition from the petjtioner and this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concerned, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shali consider and pass order, in accordance with !aw, after affording proper opportunity of hearing t6 the petitloner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may fjle additional documents, If necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt ofa copy ofthis order. The petitioner shall supply extra copy of the petition to the learned counsel appearing for the respbndents for forwarding the same to the Committee. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge .,,4.