1 WP 5527/10 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5527 OF 2010 ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. More i/b Mr. U.P. Warunjikar for the petitioner. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 16TH NOVEMBER 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 15th January 2010 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Satara rejecting the petitioner’s application that Sanjay Shankar Shinde should not be allowed to be examined as a power of attorney. 3. Reliance is placed on a decision of the 2 WP 5527/10 Supreme Court in Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani v. Indusind Bank Ltd., AIR 2005 SC 439, in which the Supreme Court has held that a power of attorney cannot be examined as a party unless the power of attorney has a personal knowledge. The trial court has recorded a finding that at that stage it cannot be said that the power of attorney had no personal knowledge. The reasoning of the trial court cannot be faulted. Consequently, no interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction is called for. The writ petition is rejected summarily. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)