IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 5619 of 2011 Decided on: August 9, 2011. Rakesh Kumar. Versus State of H.P. & ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner claims the benefit of ad hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and increments. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in his favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in LPA 36 of 2010, Sita Ram versus State of Himachal Pradesh & ors.. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. The petitioner submits that he would file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for him to do so. As and when the same is made, the second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon within a period of four months from the date of the production of copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment, referred to above. 2. The Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. August 9, 2011. ( Justice Sanjay Karol), (vs) Judge.