Civil Revision No. 48 of 2010 [ 1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 48 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 5.4.2010 Rajesh Kumar and others .. Petitioners v. Murti Tirathankar Bhagwan Shree Paras Nath Ji Shree Digamber Jain Chhota Mandir and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Sanjiv Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate for the respondents. .. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition is to the orders, passed by the learned courts below, whereby eviction order has been passed against the petitioners from the premises in dispute. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he has instructions from the petitioners to state that they do not wish to impugn the orders on merits in case one year time is granted to them to vacate the premises in dispute. They shall undertake to vacate the premises in dispute and hand over the vacant physical possession thereof to respondent-Trust on or before the date fixed. They will file undertaking to that effect before the learned Rent Controller, Hissar on or before 30.4.2010 and also pay the charges for use and occupation of the premises for the period in question in advance for every month and also clear the arrears, if any. To this fair stand of learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the respondents did not have any objection except that period sought for vacation of premises is on higher side. In view of the statement of learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of while upholding the orders passed by the learned courts below and granting time to the petitioners to vacate the premises in dispute on or before 31.8.2010. The petitioners shall file undertaking to that effect before the learned Rent Controller on or before 30.4.2010. This shall be subject to the condition that the petitioners shall pay the charges for use and occupation of the premises in dispute in advance for every month and also clear the arrears, if any. It Civil Revision No. 48 of 2010 [ 2] is further made clear that in case of failure to comply with the terms of undertaking, the respondent-Trust shall be entitled to file contempt petition for violation thereof. In case of failure to file undertaking before the learned Rent Controller on or before 30.4.2010, the respondents shall be entitled to execute the order of eviction passed in their favour. The petition is disposed of accordingly. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 5.4.2010 mk