In the High Court of Judicature at Patna Cr. Misc. No.25014 of 2008 Niranjan Mandal @ Nij Mandal & Ors. Vrs. The State of Bihar **** /2/ 11.07.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners are not named as accused for offence under Sections 323 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is alleged that the marriage of complainant’s daughter was settled with son of Uchcho Mandal, rupees twenty five thousand was also paid for marriage expenses, but marriage was postponed as further dowry was demanded. So far petitioner, Jitendra Mandal, is concerned, he is alleged to have pressed the neck of the complainant’s husband with towel, other petitioners are also said to be present there. It has been submitted by the petitioners’ counsel that money has been received by Uchcho Mandal, who is not a petitioner here and regarding assault it has been stated that there is no injury. 3. Considering the facts, the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners, namely, (1) Niranjan Mandal @ Nij Mandal, (2) Jitendra Mandal, (3) Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Mandal and (4) Jhagru Mandal, is allowed. They are directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in case of their surrender before the Court concerned within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. 547 of 2007 to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Cp:3/S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J. )