J- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR TRANSFER PETITION rCivil] No. JI /2010 Smt. Shweta Dewangan, aged about 26 years, W/o Shri Chandrahas Dewangan, R/o C-116, Gayatri Nagar, Besides Jagganath Temple, Raipur, Distt- Raipur (CG) 'fl ^.^ ,0'S'^C Chandrahas Dewangan, \*'7f ^' >.•" ^~>.: _aged about 32 years, •** .^ *-?.•"" •^•^t'S/o Vishnu Prasad Dewangan. .ry^y R/o 102/A. Ruabandha Sector, ^ f ,9 '^ Bhilai, Distt - Durg (CG) /^ y' Versus Petitioner Respondent <&' §»• ^' <^'i?~ TRANSFER PETITION UNDER SECTION 24 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE1908 —78 T=T •<<l<11<n<1, snil-H'ie, fs<dl'ylj,< 'T.P.c^' 11 7^10 sti^?! Tra^? (li°if^»i<T) STI^T q^ Ri.iicb ^H^T^?T Stl'qj^ S-Knt^ TRft^ 3T1^T S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Adiarwd 07-05-2010 Shri Kshitij Sharma, counsel fot Heard on admission. By way of instant petition, tt»4 case from Family Court, Durg to Far|iity Court, Raipuron the greund that the case under Section 125 of the Gode of Criminal Procedure preferred by the petitioner is pendind Court, Raipur which is preferred by| petitioner has an year otd baby and itjis not convenient for her to go to Durg along with her baby on Uie <<ates of hearing. It was further contended that fte respondent is e\(en not paying any maintBnance amount to the petitioner. Therefore, ( before the Family Court, Durg may] Raipur. 1 have heard leamed counsel ijor the petiBener and periKed the material placed on record. The distance between Raipur is not such a distance which can cai|se inconvenient to the petitioner. The petitioner is atways at liberty statutory provisions ctaiming lityation eaqaenses as well as maintenance in accordance with taw. In view of above, 1 do not flrld any substancs in the petiUon. Therefore, the petition being devoid herebv dismissed. ^>T*fki*inl'I +if^<^ ^f ts^ <Fii<^.i< ^sfRnsn^r the petiBoner. peUttoner wants to fransfer the conskjeration before the Famity the petitioner prior in Ume; the he case filed by the respondents be transferred to Family Court, |and Durg is only 40 Knre. Which :o file an application under the Kw of merits is liable to be and is -»-^ ^ Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge