IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P. No. 2991 of 2010 Decided on 15.6.2010 Jai Lal ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others. …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl.A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is a teacher appointed by the Parents Teachers Association. He is aggrieved since he has been replaced by the fourth respondent who is a regular teacher. There is also a contention that there are other vacancies still lying vacant where the fourth respondent can be accommodated without disturbing the petitioner. It is a matter for the petitioner to point out before the second respondent. In the event of the petitioner filing an appropriate representation before the second respondent, the matter will be duly considered by the second respondent on merit with notice to the petitioner and the fourth respondent and appropriate order in accordance with law and justice shall be passed by the second respondent within another one month. It is made clear that in case the fourth respondent can be accommodated in any of the available vacancies pointed out by the petitioner, the second respondent will also see whether the petitioner can be retained in the school. The petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications. Dasti copy on usual terms. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. June 15, 2010(K/HL) ( Justice Kuldip Singh ), Judge