FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3840 OF 2011 "Revan Vasant Lahamge Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. K.S. Bhore, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. V.H. Dighe, AGP for respondent No.1 to 3. Mr. S.D. Dhongde, Advocate for respondent No.4. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent. 2] It is the grievance of the petitioner that though an additional land of the petitioner is acquired for the changed alignment of the canal, the same is disputed by the learned counsel for the respondent No.4. 2] Both the parties agree that the dispute can be resolved if the petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (C). 3] Rule is,therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clause (C). The joint measurement be done by the T.I.L.R., in presence of the petitioner as well as the representative of FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3840 OF 2011 "Revan Vasant Lahamge Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 respondent No.4, within six weeks, after giving notice to the concerned parties. Needless to state that in the event the report of the T.I.L.R. goes in favour of the petitioner, the petitioner will have a fresh cause of action to approach this court. [M.T. JOSHI,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-