IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1690 of 2011 Umesh Mishra, S/o Ram Shresth Mishr, Village+P.O.- Barhi, P.S.-Benipatti, District-Madhubani. ........Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar, through its Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Chief Engineer, P.W.D. Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Executive Engineer, P.W.D., Road Division Madhubani. 4. Superintendent Engineer, P.W.D. Road Circle, Darbhanga. ..........Respondents ----------- 02 28.06.2011 The claim of the petitioner is based on the so called circular of the State Government wherein it has been laid down that persons who had worked for more than 240 days in a year prior to their regularization would be considered for regularization. From Annexure-2, it is evident that the claim of the petitioner is based on having worked for more than 240 days between 1983 and 1985. But petitioner stood removed thereafter. Circular of such kind is not available to a man who is not in employment in any capacity with the State for last 25 years. It is a misplaced kind of writ petition not based on the thorough true understanding of the circular on the issue. The writ is dismissed. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.) Safik