1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.491/2008 (Raju Vaishnav & Ors. Vs. State & Ors.) Date of order : 22.01.2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. Mahipal Rajpurohit, for the petitioners. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. In this case, the petitioners have prayed for direction to the respondents not to interfere with the property of the petitioners as described in the petition. It is very strange that the prayer has been made by the petitioners that the respondents may be restrained from interfering with the property of the petitioners whereas in para – 2 of the writ petition, it is stated by the petitioners themselves that the premises in which they are running business is belonging to one Hiralal Bhadu (Choudhary) and he is owner of the said premises. Meaning thereby, the petitioners are admittedly not owner of the property 2 in question and they are seeking directions from this Court that the respondents may be restrained from interfering with the property of the petitioners. When the property in question is not belonging to the petitioners, then there is no question of granting any relief or directions to the respondents as prayed for by the petitioners in the writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. arun