HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NTAINAL Writ Petition No. 1986 of 2008 (M/S) Principal, Narain Swamy Dental College, Nandaki Chowki, 10, Prem Nagar, Dehradun. ……………Petitioner. Versus Chief Information Commissioner, Uttarakhand, Dehradun, and three others. ………….. Respondents Mr. R.C. Tamta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Vipual Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no.1. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, learned Additional CSC for State. Mr. Vinond Nautiyal, learned counsel for the respondent no.3. Mr. Ravi Joshi, learned counsel for the respondent no.4. 12th February, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. R.C. Tamta, learned counsel for the petitioner, the Mr. Vipul Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no.1, Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, learned Additional CSC for State and Mr. Vinod Nautiyal, learned counsel for the respondent no.3. and Mr. Ravi Joshi, learned counsel for the respondent no.4. Petitioner has alternative remedy to approach the Central information Commission or State Information Commission as the case may be, under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, 2005, Writ petition is both premature and not maintainable at this stage, in view of the alternative remedy. Therefore, writ petition is dismissed. Petitioner may move application under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 for redressal of his grievance. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 12.02.2009 SKS