IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42809 of 2010 BALI MUKHIYA son of Jay Mangal Mukhiya, R/v Hazara Tikulia, P.S. Muffassil Motihari, Dist- East Champaran. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 25.1.2011 Heard, Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. The petitioner is in custody since 26.8.2010 in Sessions Trail No. 437 of 2010 (arising out of Sugauli Rail P.S. Case No. 66 of 2009) for the offences under Sections 341,324, 307 and 34 of the I.P.C. The petitioner has prayed for bail on the strength that one co-accused having similar accusation namely, Surendra Mukhiya, has been extended the privilege of bail on 16.72010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 23051 of 2010. On going through the F.I.R it appears that the accusation against co- accused Surendra Mukhiya, was almost similar to the accusation made against the petitioner. Since co-accused on similar allegation has been extended the privilege of bail there is no reasons to deny the prayer 2 for bail to the petitioner. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge F.T.C-III Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 437 of 2010 (arising out of Sugauli Rail P.S. Case No. 66 of 2009). Prakash (Rakesh Kumar, J.)