HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SECOND APPEAL NO. 73 1 103 ECOND APPEAL UNDER SE'CTION 100 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE coDE, 1 08. (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Preen Shri Ra umar Tiwari, Advocate for the appellant st m K Sh Azad lqu Advocate for the respondents No l 85 2 Sh mo Kumar Tekam, P L for the State/respondent No 3 - JUDGEMENT (Passed en 27/08/2011; 1. By ths second peal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 18 (in short ‘the Code’) appellant has challenged the legality and proprety of the judgment and decree dated 12/9/ 2003 passed by Addinal District udge, Bilaspur (C.G.) in civil appeal No. 12-A/ 2002. Shri am Kumar Tiwari, Advocate for the appellant, Shri Azad Siddiqui, Advote for the respondents No. 1 8r. 2 and Shri Vinod Kumar Tekam, P.L. fr the State] respondent No. 3 are heard. 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the appellant prays for Withdrawal of this secod appeal with liberty to approach proper forum i.e. vil Court Revenue Court or both the Courts below available under the law. 4.‘ Prayer allowed. eq Consuently, second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid libert. o order as o costs. N t Sd/— ' T. P. Sharma Judge S n Slddl m Vd ORAL i ap 90 i tio J R ca o n Ci or y APPELLANT Basant Kumar son of Baldu Samami PLAINTIFF aged about 36 years resident of Koharoda, P.S. RiSda, Mastun', Tahsil Masturi Distt. Bilaspur (C.G;). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. D111p Smgh son of (/hurawanlal aged DEFENDANTS about 28 years 2. Churawan1a1 son of Asharam aged 47 yems. Both residents of Village Koharoda Tahsil Masturi Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). 3. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Collector Bilaspur (C.G.).