1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.11.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.BASHA and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petition (MD) No.12605 of 2011 Mohamed Uduman Ali ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai District. 4.The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Melur, Madurai District. 5.The Block Development Officer, Kottampatti Union, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 03.10.2011, pertaining to remove the encroachment in respect of the Survey No.506/6 in Chockalingapuram Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. and pass orders within a stipulated time. For petitioner ... Mrs.Lakshmi Gopinathan For respondents .. Mr.K.Mahendran,special Government Pleader ORDER (Order of the Court was made by K.N.BASHA, J.) The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for the relief of a direction to the respondents to consider his representation dated 03.10.2011 and pass orders on merits within a stipulated time. 2.By mutual consent of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.Mahendran, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing, at the admission stage itself. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that though a representation has been given by the petitioner as early as on 03.10.2011, the same has not been considered by the respondents till date and as such the petitioner has been constrained to approach this Court with the present writ petition with the aforesaid prayer. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.Heard the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, on the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5.In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner herein, this Court, without going into the merits of the representation of the petitioner dated 03.10.2011 and without expressing any view in respect of such representation, constrained to direct the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 03.10.2011, by affording opportunity to the petitioner as well as to the other relevant parties and to pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(T&P) /TRUE COPY / SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. gcg To: 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai District. 4.The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Melur, Madurai District. 5.The Block Development Officer, Kottampatti Union, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. 1CC To Special Government Pleader SR No.37094. Sb 22/11/2011 2p 7c Order in W.P.(MD)No.12605 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/