1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Second day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.9707 of 2011 1.RAJINI @ KANDASAMY 2.SILAMBU @ SILAMBURASAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.3 & 4 Vs STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE WEST POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR, CR.NO.371 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.ARUN PRASAD Advocate For Respondent : MR. A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos.3 and 4 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 399 of IPC r/w 2(c) and 27(3) of Indian Arms Act, in Crime No.371 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that there are totally five accused in this case. The fifth petitioner has already enlarged on anticipatory bail and hence, they prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioners along with three other accused is said to have planned to commit dacoity. He further submits that at the time of planning, the respondent police has arrested the accused Nos. 1 and 2 and others are all escaped from the respondent police and he prays for dismissal of this application. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thanjavur, and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thanjavur, and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 02/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, THANJAVUR 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THANJAVUR AT KUMBAKONAM 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE WEST POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. A.ARUN PRASAD Advocate SR.No.25696 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9707 of 2011 Date :02/08/2011 TR : 04.08.2011: 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/