1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.313 OF 2010 Masuood Alam Khan Pathan ...Petitioner. v/s. Smt. Sharwari Gokhale & Anr. ...Respondents. None for the Petitioner. Mr. A.I.I.Patel, A.G.P. For the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : AUGUST 11, 2011. P.C. 1 Petitioner in person is not present. On the last date also he was not present. The learned AGP states that the petitioner had requested him to seek adjournment. However, in view of the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to adjourn the matter. 2 Affidavit-in-Reply dated 21st February, 2011 filed by Dr. Sanjay S. Dhavale on behalf of the respondents shows that pensionary benefits as per 6th Pay Commission have been given to the petitioner. Accounts Officer has informed vide letter dated 3.8.2010 that pursuant to the 5th Pay Commission, petitioner is paid revised basic pension at the rate of Rs.3407/- and as per 6th Pay Commission, the revised basic pay pension at Rs.7701/- is paid. Difference in pay has also been paid by the cheque. Thus, the order has been fully complied and, therefore, nothing 2 remains in the petition. 3 Therefore, the petition stands dismissed. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)