IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Restoration Application No.16 of 2008. In S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.1219 of 1999. Hanuman son of Shri Laxman VERSUS Om Prakash son of Shri Heera Lal & Others Date Of Order ::: 19/03/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain J. Ms. Manju Dave, Counsel for the applicant None present for the respondents BY THE COURT : Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant has filed an application for restoration of the appeal. There is delay in filing the application, therefore, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has also been filed. The matter was listed before this Court on 03.03.2008 and the Counsel for the appellant was directed to supply a copy of both the applications to Shri S.C. Srivastava, advocate, who was appearing for the respondents in the appeal. It was also directed that the name of Shri S.C. Srivastava, advocate may also be shown in the daily cause-list. Learned counsel for the applicant Ms. Manju Dave, submits that she has already supplied a copy of both the applications to Shri Ram Singh Rathore, advocate, who is associate with Shri S.C. Srivastava. The name of Shri S.C. Srivastava, advocate has already been shown in the daily cause- list, but no one is present on behalf of the respondents to oppose the present applications. After considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the appellant and the reasons assigned in both the applications, I think it fit and proper in the interest of justice to condone the delay and to restore the appeal to its original number. Consequently, both the applications are allowed. The delay in filing the application is condoned. The appeal is restored to its original number. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. ashok/