Crl. Misc. No. M-31343 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-31343 of 2011 Date of Decision : October 17, 2011 Rajbala .... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Rajbala accused has filed the instant petition for anticipatory bail in case FIR No.32 dated 23.01.2011, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 506, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Palam Vihar, Gurgaon. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the case file. One Dharminder, who was owner of plot in question, died on 25.12.2009. The petitioner got executed sale deed dated 03.11.2010 of the said plot in her own favour purporting to have been executed by Dharminder (since deceased). Dharminder was allegedly impersonated by Crl. Misc. No. M-31343 of 2011 2 one Jitender, who was identified by petitioner's own son Sandeep as being the vendor Dharminder. Counsel for the petitioner contended that original sale deed in favour of Dharminder was shown to the petitioner, when she purchased the plot. However, Dharminder was not even alive, when sale deed of the plot was executed in favour of the petitioner. Obviously, sale deed was executed by some impersonator. The said impersonator was identified by petitioner's own son being Dharminder vendor, who was already dead. In view of the aforesaid, I find no ground for extending benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The petition is meritless and is accordingly dismissed. However, nothing observed herein shall have any bearing on the merits of the case. October 17, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE