IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.11138 of 2010 Date of decision: 04.08.2011 Phuman Singh ....Petitioner Versus The Financial Commissioner, Cooperation, Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. G.S. Nagra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jaswinder Singh, DAG, Punjab. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that learned Financial Commissioner has directed for the fresh proclamation inviting the applications for the post of Namberdar, therefore, petitioner shall also apply for the post of Namberdar; application of the petitioner seeking appointment on the post of Namberdar should be considered at its own merit by the authorities in accordance with law and his candidature should not be rejected merely because impugned order has been passed cancelling his appointment. Request of the learned counsel for the petitioner seems to be genuine. If petitioner moves an application seeking appointment on the post of Namberdar pursuant to the impugned order, same shall be decided in accordance with law at its own merit. Petition stands disposed of. (Alok Singh) Judge August 04, 2011 R.S.