IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-11949 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 31.05.2011 Vishwas Tripathi ....Petitioner Versus State of Harana and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in complainant case No.84 dated 21.7.2009 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. In the present case complaint was filed against the petitioner under Section 138, which is pending before the competent Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in compliance of order dated 21.4.2011 petitioner has surrendered/appeared before learned trial Court and has already been enlarged on bail by the trial Court. He undertakes that on each and every date petitioner shall keep on appearing before the trial Court. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. Order dated 21.4.2011 is made absolute. (Alok Singh) Judge May 31, 2011 R.S.