IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1037 of 2008 RAMJHARI DEVI & ORS. Versus BIRENDRA SINGH & ORS. ----------- 06/ 17.03.2009 An interlocutory application dated 12.02.2009 has been filed on behalf of the petitioners for condoning the delay of 21 days in filing of the M.J.C. petition. Considering the averments made by learned counsel for the petitioners and the statements made in the interlocutory application, it appears that genuine reasons have been shown due to which M.J.C. could not be filed earlier. Accordingly, the said interlocutory application is allowed and delay in filing of the M.J.C. is condoned. M.J.C. No.1037 of 2008 has been filed on behalf of the petitioners for restoration of Civil Revision No.481 of 2006, which was dismissed by this court due to non-compliance of peremptory order dated 13.02.2008 by which the petitioners were granted two weeks peremptory time to take steps for fresh service of notice with correct present address for opposite party nos.2 to 9 under registered cover with A/D. Considering the averments made by learned counsel for the petitioners and statements made in the petition, it appears that genuine reasons have been shown which prevented learned counsel for the petitioners from appearing on the aforesaid date due to which he had no knowledge or information of the said order, hence they could not comply the same. In the said circumstances, order dated 2 05.03.2008 is recalled and Civil Revision No.481 of 2006 is restored to its original file and number. However, this order will be subject to full compliance of order dated 13.02.2008 by Friday (20.03.2009), failing which this M.J.C. shall stand dismissed without further reference to a Bench and order dated 05.03.2008 passed in Civil Revision No.481 of 2006 shall become operative. harish/ ( S.N.Hussain, J.)