HIGH OURI OF (,HHAF IISGARH Al BII A$PUR 4 % W rl‘DETIT’ON (C) \Io 6063 0t 2006 Shiv Prasad Yadav son of Late Shn' Vixwanath Yadav, aged about 27 years, Panch, resident of village Parsadhondi, viliage Panchayat Dumardeeh, ‘Distriet Surguja, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS . State of Chhattisgarh through. tlw Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The District Project Ooicer, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. ‘ 3. The Block Education Omcer, Lundra, District Surguja, Cimattisgarh. 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat > Lundm District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. S. Janshiksha Kendra Dumardeeh, through’iits Incharge, Block Lundm Dxstrict Surguja Chhattisgarh WRIT PE l‘ITION UNDER AR? ICLE 226/227 OF FHE CONSTITUI 1N0 OF INDIA SB Hon’ble Slm Satlsh K Agmhotn, J PE’I‘II‘IONER t—n RESPONDENTS : 1’rosent: Shri V.K.Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.S.Kachhwaha, Deputy Advocate General with Shri Amrito Das, Panel Lawiler for the Statefrespondents 1 to 3 ORDER ORAL (Passed on 06 day of July, 2909) Heard. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that in View ofthe judgment and order dated 14.09.2006 paseed by a Division Bench ofthis Court in WKP. (PIL) No. 6500/2006 (Gram Panchayat, Bade Mudpar Block & Tahsil Maikharada, District Jary‘gir—Champa (C.G.) v. State of- Chhattisgarh & 5 others), the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage. However, he seeks permission of this Court to file a fresh representation before the competent authorities for considering his case, in accordance with law, on its own merits. 2. Shri Kachhwaha, Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State/respondents 1 to 3 submits that in the event, a Eesh representation is made, the same shali be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits, within. a period offour weeks n'om the date of making ofthe representation. In View ofthe above, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing remains for adjudication. Consequently, the petition is disposed of. interim order dated 10.11.2006 is vacated. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri ' Judge L