aa^M ^-SMB ^AV^ AdtC^ ^»p">t '^^-^w ..^Ss^ ^s^'" ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUR.E CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^ _ ^GIEBENCH Writ Petition No.LT^ •s~^-1 of 2006. In the matter of section 2(x) of the Chhattisgarh Commercial Tax Act. 1994 And In the matter of section 70 (1) of the Chhattisga.rh Commercial Tax Act. 1994 -•\-->., r :-"s, And In the matter of section 71 (3) of the Chhattisgarh Commercial Tax Act. 1994 And In the matter of an application under Articles 226/227 of the constitution of India. In the matter of :- Petitioner Resoondents c^K v ^ftl' ^^^ UR And Seth Banshidhar Kedia Steel Industries, ThroughProprietor Prakash Kedia,'- S/o. Abirchand Kedia, Aged about 47 years, R/o. 3- South Avenue Choubey Colony, Raipur (C.G.) Versus ,,*. 1. Board of Revenue (Commercial Tax Tribunal) through secretary, Bilaspur (C.G.) ^.•;»A •f. '-^ •'• • , ? •» 2. Commissioner of k- Commercial Tax Vanijyik Kar'Bhavan Civil lines Raipur(C.G.) 3. State of Chhattisgarh through .. sucretary Department of Commercial Tax DKS • Mantralaya Bhavan Raipur (C.G.) y'fc Before:- Uon'blc the Chief Justice and his companion iudaes of the Hon'ble Hiah Court of Judicature Chhattisaarh at Bilasour. _•_ ^__>_' _•, ' ^ ; _ . . -.'. Petition under Articles 226/227 of the constitutiQd of India for issuance of suitable directions orders or writs includina writs in the'^ature of t. mandamus certiordri etc.:- The humble petition.of the petitioner abo»e mentioned most respectfully shev»ethas under:- ,* T XI-HC—78 sn^i ^i Ri-ii'* ^TSTT 3T1^?T sfti4 Raju dTC| ^||<<K»)A|^yj]y<|g^ fs|c||^^< S^o^/06 ^JO. sn^r''!^? (i°if^«<<q) ?Biiw<te an^r 'ble Mr. Nseiabh Dubey, Mr. M.P.S. Bhatia, Debut,' I.A.No.7359of2006. This is an aDDtlcation The appiication is ord On the request of !e; one week ttme is aranted Qffice, faiiing which prosecution without fered as prayed for. 'ned counsel appearing for the petitioner, ^rafa^i iw:i?if tf felst <r'ii*^i< ^affipTSII^I ounset for the oetitioner. .;'? make good tB^dsfault as pointed out by the btition shali stend dismissed for want of to the Bench. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge y^f ^ -h T^ •<<i<4i<i'li, »Ti1yi<o, fsidiyy,< *TW?(T »<11<ti •WI.200 sn^r Tra^? ('^3^?) aii^i 'w ft-ti-ti W 311^1 sniiti 4tl^fcl4l*1 ilH??l'^'fel3t' <Fqt$t< ^aifaHan^i 16/01/2009 laviewofthereport dated 15/01/2009 submitted by the office, this W.P. No. is treated as dismissed for non compliance of Hon'ble Court order dated 19/11/2008. (For detail note sheet part may kindly be seen). "'>.•-«.. -c "^- Counsel be iriifomied accordingly. (<~v - ± ~~ Sd/- A. R. (Judl.) s. o. rw.p.t yiiy^iit ^?g?"n^T, -FS/197—3/2008—40,000. /