IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 27TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 8TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 37014 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- B.S.SANJEEV, APPRAISER, MATTANCHERRY SARVAJANIC CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.3284, COCHIN-1. BY ADV. SRI.P.P.JACOB RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. MATTANCHERRY SARVAJANIC CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.3284, COCHIN-1, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY/MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (G), ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.T.A.RAJAN FOR R1 GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.K.RAVIKRISHNAN FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P(C) NO.37014/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER NO.EM(4)3177/03 DATED 23,6,2003 ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OP. SOCIETIES, TRIVANDRUM TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT P2: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGEMENT IN WP(C) 20947/03 DATED 30.10.03. EXT P3: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 2.12.2006. EXTP4: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER PRODUCED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 26.12.2006. EXTP5: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P(C) 490/07 DATED 3.1.2009. EXT P6; TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGEMENT IN C.C.C.759/08 DATED 16.9.2008 EXT P7: TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 13.11.2008. EXT P8: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 29.11.2008. EXT P9: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER ISSUEDBY PETITIONER TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 3.12.2008. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS; NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.37014 of 2008-F = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 27th day of February, 2009. JUDGMENT As is discernible even from Ext.P6 judgment, any right of the petitioner to enjoy the fruits of the earlier decision will depend upon the outcome of SLP(C)No.20080/2008, particularly when there is an order of stay granted by the Apex Court regarding payment of emoluments for any retrospective period. Under such circumstances, I do not find any ground for issuance of any order compelling the employer to consider the request contained in Ext.P9. The learned counsel for the first respondent also states that depending on the outcome of the matter pending before the Supreme Court, the case of the petitioner would be finalized. This is recorded. No further orders are called for. Writ petition closed. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/270209