IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2268 of 2010 1. Shankar Sada, son of Kailu Sada 2. Jagat Sada, son of Sirekhan Sada (Both resident of village-Ahiapur, P.S.-Bachhwara, District- Begusarai) Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 07.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Bachhwara P.S.Case No.150 of 2008 originally registered under Section 364/34 of the I.P.C but subsequently offence under Section 302/34 of the I.P.C. was also added. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that according to the prosecution case, they are said to be last seen in the company of the deceased, but during course of investigation, it was found that some other persons were responsible for committing the crime in question and the manner of occurrence is different from what has been disclosed in the F.I.R. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and pointed out that petitioners are 2 specifically named in the F.I.R. as accused and there are ample materials to show their complicity in the crime in question. In that view of the matter, prayer for anticipatory bail made on behalf of petitioners is dismissed. The petitioners must surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and may seek regular bail. If such prayer is made, then that shall be disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. V.K. Pandey (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)