® §wii®§é GEELEQT @‘F C%IHATT§3<§£-§R%§ Q? EiiASJPLgR EEWgéGM BEEEEQE’i 4gggggg w w“? 3H§§ RQJFEKI bi m «E ME§Q. Jfamaaai i‘éaéLw g? Ewéi “xiimaa Vawa e i ,i ‘lasm ' 3m Fra‘fu} Ehafa‘c ans: Sm: Keahav Deewangan, coun$e§ fag“ the appeilanta §kg3§aat Rah! Kumar Gautam, Sm Aj§i Pachauré. CEaimamS Ageé abcu‘: 42 years Ku Tap“ D/Q SW Paw (m 9V Gwigm, Aged aaeut years Ki; D&yu, Eva Sm Pa}§v Ku‘mar @autam. Auyd be Qvcaa€ Ku Neei. DEG Shri Rajiv Kumar Gauiam‘ Aggd abcxmi 5 year$ Mimi‘s n‘eugh namaE guardiém zmd Kamar Gguaam; agpa§§am fame? R&3§v Gguaam; agpa§§am Hm ilxii .r/e Dh 'arf‘pum, Na”; £agda§wt D§£fit3 a ("G; t VERSQS Rwaande 3m km sxgssatsééaams Ramesh Chemdra Bzir’cii‘ $70 Ggopaii Chandra Barazi, Farest Range Oxfioe, Jagd&ipur, Sist Bastar (CG) ,mnga C) Gal Faresi Range Offbg, lear Fma$ Paiéce Office, Jagdaipw, Dist Bas;t3:z’ (CG) $iai'e a? hhwissgarb ‘ihmugh Qcnaervamr of Fmesi, Jagdaipur CirCEe, Jagdaipur 9'33? 3as’zar (Ct?) “ii: s a anmia$ gmea uw '“ $g mm 17$ a? None far remmndent No1 thaugh served 53hri Sudh§r Eajpai, Daputy Governrnaa% Advswie fa! .un we wmtef QM‘ responwntg No.2 anti 3. amER Wm Mam, mm The faHewmg orcier of ihe Court wa$ passed. by Fmjeav @uptag {12“}: Thisa is cia§mami§ aweai for enhancemem of me campeiiga‘zion awarded by the 4‘ h Adahmnai \ ;. Mater Accidem Ciaims Tribunai, Jagcéaipur (fa-r wort ‘the ?ribunal’) Vida award dated ed in Siaim Case Ne.184f2§04. $ 43?,8€J,{}UQI», Ciaimw by time apgeiiant3/6.aimants, Lmfcriunaie faiher md y‘gumger $isiexa of decaaged Bmne Kuma? Gauiam by fiiing a ciaim pe‘iiimn under $esiim $6§ of 'ihe Matsr Vehioées Act, far h§$ daa‘ih (m 01982002 an acwum 3f the §njuries gustained by him m the mater accident 0n Q3872002, the Tribunai awarded a toia% sum 9f R$.?,27500Gin as mmmmmticrn to the ciaimat‘itxa aEGng with intere$i @ 6% {may ammm ’Emm the data of We fi§ ng 0f the slaim paiticn ién ihe daie 0f actuat paiyme‘ai. 3) ‘E’h$ Tribunal on a c§0$a scrum}; of the emiire evidsmce ied 1. " x x 3?,082302 cm assaum of the }n}wi@s sustained by him in‘i'he momr amident er: 08.072002; the accEdent occurred ‘dhe t0 rash am hagiigent driving <3? the drivar cf 13m effhhdihg vemcie Traciar bewirg regi$iration NoMPZ-6‘Z82; as the abgve chewing vehmie s ii held mar §e¢ea$ed mcme Kumar Gautam Jsad on a L)s Traciar W33 Gwned by the $ta€e Government, the Staie Gavemment wag iiabEe wto pay the campanaatian to ihe claimanta. 4‘: A3 t‘nE respondents have na’t Wed any appeai agaimt the awarfi, ihe abmie findings mcarded by ihe Tribuna} hm“ now I 5) The 'é"ribw1a% wr‘sides'mg ‘me gage 0f “me deceased and ihe othy circL§m$iance$ Q? me Gaga a3$ea3é§ §umg3—$um a? Fig.?j25,{§50f~ as compenaaiien m the ca$e, By awarding fkérther sum Gf R$.2,0GG/u mward3 mnemE expenws, the Tribunal awarded a tam wm $f Rm ,27,00Q/n a3 compensation t0 the cEaiman’E$ wr the cieai‘h 0€ deceased Drama Kumai' Gauiam in the motor acddeam. The T¥§buha! fume.“ dimcted paymeat sf inierne$i an the abeve _ ameunr 0'? em‘npeneeiien o‘r‘ Rs.‘1,2’f,€)9i}im 6% per arrrrum frem the ae’ie e? f§§in of the swim etitio‘n tin ”me dev‘ze 07 emu a ha‘mem e }’ e) Shri Pram? Eharai and Shré Keehev i3ewangem, lewned ceuneei fer (h: appeiiaete eu‘emihed that me Tribune! hes erred in awareing 30w cempeneaiéen o?“ Re.’:,27,0CQ/-= {my ae deceaeed Sesame i umcr Gem-em woaw have exiended gYea‘i supeer‘i “i0 his femex . l.’ e ' m hm L~ 31d age. T) Shri $udhé¥ $ajpei, learned Deputy Gavernment Advecaie ‘ior reeeeedenie N02 and 3 on ihe ether hand euppartee fine award end centemded that ae deceased Drone Kumer Gautam wee aged aboui 1A. years eniy and was net havrng any income 0f hre own! the cemeeneatieh of RM ,2?,GOQ/- awardedrby the Triburrai re guei errd eroper eempemeeé‘ien En the fade and circumetancee ef ihe present s a . ‘ L raSE, 85) Thai unfmunate accident in which Dmne Kumar Gautam host hig Iiié isok wage in the year 2002. Accofciing i0 the p0$i1 iarmm rggm, deceased. Smne Kumar Gautam was aged abaut 1-4 years. %~& wag esiudying in g“ s’andard. It ha8 came in the eviiiensa that ciaimami N01 Rajiv Kumar Gautam had one sm‘a am 'Ehree fjaughtem, meaning ‘thereby ihat he last his sniy scan m 'ths metar acaidgn‘i.’ Deneased Dmna Kumar’Gaumm remainad zmder treatment at JagdaEpur, Raipur and Vigakhapatnam fGr a period 0f abcut cme month. His faii’iar must have iapent subsianiiai amOLiri; rm his ’n ain'ieni and iii iaking him fmm Jagdaipur ta Raipur and inen i0 \i’igakhapainam; and 'aisn in bringing back his body from ‘u’isakhapatnam t0 Jezgdaipur. Q)’ The aompamaiinn 9i Rsii,27,CiaGf“ awaided by tine Tribunai Whaan axamined in the cantext of iv: abnve mentiannc’i bmad feaiureg of the caSe, is ceriainiy an thg iower Side and deeervee in be enhanced euitebiy. i0) Considering aii the reiev‘eni aeeec‘is ef the matter! we are of ine eninien ii‘iei 'iuriher award cf Rsi25,QQQI-- WOUid make ”the mmpeneation oi” R31. ,2‘7,ODQ’- awarded by ihe Tribune! ae jusi and prepei eempensaticn in ihe fade am? cii'eumsiiancee 0f the present Ca$3 ’i‘i) The appeal filed by ihe appeiianie/ciaiman‘is for enhancemeni of ine campeneaiian, therefei'e, ie aiiewed in part The ciaimanie are awei'ded further sum 0i R$.25,00D/— in addition it) the sum of R31 27.0(36 l— awarded by the Tribunai. The enhanced ameuni of 3)( Rs.25,000f‘ $ha5! carW intaesf - 5% per amum from the date of Wing 0f the ciafm petftmn til! ihe date 0f Emma? paymem. {2) Respondent No.3 €he Stam cf Chhaié‘isgam is granied faur mamm‘ time far (iepassiting the enmnced amount cf compmsmion interesé due ihereon @ 6% per annum 3f Ra.25,SQCI/~ aiong with -s n paymen‘t. mm me date of fih‘ng of ‘éhe ciaém petiis'on i‘iH the data of aGi‘ual padma 1.3} M; ardsr as ‘Eo sw. .Sti/~ Chief " sunii. Kumar Jusa‘Ce Judge l / ,A J