IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 16202 of 2008. Decided on: 27.06.2011. _______________________________________________ Parma Nand. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Bimal Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner claims that he has completed more than 8 years of continuous service on daily wage basis with 240 days in a block of 12 calendar months. However, his services have not been regularised. 2. It has come in the reply that the petitioner had worked continuously for 5 years and 10 months. However, Mr. Bimal Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client is still working with the respondent-department and has completed more that 8 years. If that is so, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization as 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - per the policy framed, after completion of 8 years of continuous service with 240 days in a block of 12 calendar months, within a period of 10 weeks after the production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. June 27, 2011. (sck).