PETITIONER K RESPONDENT a a Siag‘s Egnch f x (by I @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR a CHHATTISGARH H w.P.No. 4228 2004 Suresh Kumar Agrawal S/o‘ Rameshwar Agrawal Aged about glyyears, Proprietor : Abhilasha Traders Gurunanak Chowk Raipur Tahsil and District (C.G.). Raipur VERSUS x Anand Kumar, aged about —- —~ years S/o. Atmaram, R/o. Banjari Chowk, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF R CONSTITUTION OF INDIA _ ‘ XI—Hc—78 v vw‘g”mg‘422£ W V ,a W §§$w a4 W 20g 321%?! $$§mrg 321%?! WW (Wm Hawm 311w ‘mfwfmaw ii fgra‘raw ’ $ 31W? m ‘ 15-12-2004 Shri Abhay Tiwari, unsel for the petitioner. i of for correction in Hcani pleading on I.A.No.91 ofwrit peion. / 2004 Considcmd. for gmnt LA. permission allowed. Also heani on admEsion and M.(W.)P.No.4597/2004 for gain of interim relief. Petitioner’é contention is that the facts of sale of knowledge, therefore, he med ‘ property by respondent came to‘his an application for incorporatin those facts in his pleading and also hled application for taking ocnments as additional evidence under various provisions of th Code of Civil Procedum. Befoxe those applications could have een allowed or disallowed by the appellate Court, the petin'oner another application for local investigatm’n by appointing a Co 'ssioner under Order 26 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Pmcedure. The same has been dismissed by appellate Court. In fact, th said application was pie-matured ‘ lj the because till the pleadings are incorporated in wn’tten statement ‘ and documents relevant to that are taken on record, no investigation on those pleadings and documents could have been conducted or for that any Commission could have been issued. in the event of his applications pending Therefore, petitioner, under Procedure Crder are 6 Rule Wan 17 and O Lgpiwh‘on er 41 Rule 27 of anesh the Code before of Civil the concerned Court; R XI-HC—J 8 Ea W, Wm WI With the above ob$ationa the pctiu'on, med under Article 227 ofthe Consamu'on, ié dismisqéed. in the light of abdv§ order, M.(W.)P.No.4597/2004 for gant of interim relief and LA. 0.8568/2004 fot urgent hearing stand disposed of. Sdl- V.K.Shrivastava Judge Ceililied copy as pe rules. |u w~0nm4zzg> @rg’i¢§?%§§$§m 9% {:T'; 2&6 wr3wm<§fi§§u> \ a~Tr%¥1mR=tt~s amamm ‘ i mmm'aenw i $3ifawa1‘Téw