IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17249 of 2011 Md. Shakeel @ Guddu Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 24.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the petitioner introduced the complainant before one Shamshad Alam subsequently Rs. 1,15000/- was paid for employment in Arab Country. It is alleged against the petitioner that he gave forged visa and passport. Though, the cheque was issued by Shamshad Alam worth Rs. 2,00,000/- which got bounced. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the only accusation is that he introduced the complainant with main accused though the petitioner has also filed a case against Shamshad Alam for bouncing of the cheque. Considering the fact that the thrust of accusation is against Shamshad 2 Alam, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with C1- 751 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)