Crl. Revision Nos. 2901 & 2675 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Date of decision:- 01.09.2011 1. Crl. Revision No. 2901 of 2009 Mohit and another ....Petitioners Vs. Suresh Uppal ....Respondent 2. Crl. Revision No. 2675 of 2009 (O&M) Suresh Uppal ....Petitioner Vs. Mohit and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present:- Mr. Anil Ghanghas, Advocate, for the petitioners (in CRR No.2901 of 2009) and for the respondent (in CRR No.2675 of 2009. Mr. S.S. Dinarpur, Advocate, for the respondents (in CRR No.2901 of 2009) and for the petitioner (in CRR No.2675 of 2009). ***** A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) This judgment shall dispose of Crl. Revision Nos. 2901 and 2675 of 2009, as both have arisen out of the same judgment. For reference, facts are taken from Criminal Revision No. 2901 of 2009. Assailed in these petitions, is the judgment dated 07.08.2009 passed by the District Judge, Family Court, Hisar, whereby Suresh Uppal-father was directed to pay maintenance to Crl. Revision Nos. 2901 & 2675 of 2009 2 the tune of Rs.7000/- per month to the petitioners. The maintenance awarded by the trial Court appears to be quite appropriate and reasonable. No scope for enhancement or reduction in the same is made out. No illegality or irregularity has been pointed out in the impugned judgment, warranting interference by this Court at this revisional stage. But, the trial Court has granted maintenance from the date of order and it would be expedient in the interest of justice and the law also wants that the maintenance should have been granted from the date of application, unless it is proved otherwise that the trial was delayed on account of the fault on the part of the person claiming maintenance. Nothing such was pointed out to this Court. Resultantly, both the revision petitions are hereby dismissed with modification in the impugned judgment to the extent that the maintenance would be paid from the date of application. (A.N.JINDAL) 01.09.2011 JUDGE ajp