IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.153 of 2011 BIPIN YADAV @ VINAY YADAV @ VINOD YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.2339 of 2011 BASISTH MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR 02/ 04.02.2011 Both the above stated criminal miscellaneous cases have arisen out of Patahi P.S. Case no. 27/2009 registered under sections 307, 353 of the IPC, 3/ 4 of the explosive Substance Act as well as 17 of the CLA Act and accordingly, both the above stated petitions are being disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioners are not named in the FIR nor anything has been recovered from their conscious possession. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that the petitioners were seen fleeing away just after the alleged occurrence. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that except the aforesaid material, there is nothing against the petitioners and so far as criminal antecedent of the petitioners is concerned, petitioner in Cr. Misc. no. 153/2011 does not have any criminal antecedent whereas petitioner in Cr. Misc. no. 2339/2011 carries criminal antecedent of only one case which is evident from para 12 of the above stated criminal miscellaneous case. Considering the aforesaid facts as well as circumstances of the case, petitioners (Bipin Yadav @ Vinay Yadav @ Vinod Yadav - 2 - and Basisth Mahto) are directed to be released on bail in connection with Patahi P.S. Case no. 27 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000-/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran/SDJM, Sikrahana at Motihari. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)