CR No. 6380 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CR No. 6380 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.11.2010 Rajiv Garg ....Petitioner Versus Parveen Kumar ....Respondent. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Padam Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. ... Alok Singh, J.(Oral) The only grievance of the petitioner is that the Executing Court has directed to release the sale consideration in favour of the respondent – vendor, however, the vendor is not executing sale deed and is not delivering possession to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent states that sale deed shall be executed in favour of the petitioner on the date fixed by the Executing Court and physical vacant peaceful possession shall also be handed over to the petitioner along with previous title deeds within such time as fixed by the Executing Court. CR No. 6380 of 2010 2 In view of the statement made the by the learned counsel for the respondent, present petition stands disposed of with the direction that the respondent shall execute sale deed in favour of the petitioner on the date fixed by the Executing Court and shall also handover physical peaceful vacant possession to the petitioner within such time as fixed by the Executing Court along with previous title deeds. The Executing Court shall ensure the payment of entire sale consideration in favour of the respondent on execution of the sale deed and transfer of possession. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 10.11.2010 sk.