HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24335 of 2011 Date:07.09.2011 Between: Chillampally Parameshwar ..... Petitioner AND The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and three others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: None appeared Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: Sri R.Radha Krishna REddy Standing Counsel for GHMC Counsel for Respondent No.4: Sri C.Vishnu Kumar The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.1 to 3 in not taking action on the petitioner’s representation, dated 06.04.2011, against the alleged illegal construction being undertaken by respondent No.4 in premises bearing MCH No.14-4-243/A/1 of Shahinayathgunj, Hyderabad, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner sought for a consequential direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to demolish the alleged illegal structures raised by respondent No.4. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. I have heard Sri R.Radha Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation appearing for respondents Nos.1 to 3 and Sri C.Vishnu Kumar, learned counsel representing respondent No.4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 submitted that respondent No.4 has obtained building permission for construction of stilt + two upper floors for residential purpose; that when respondent No.4 sought to raise an extra floor, the officials of respondent No.1 have sought to prevent her from raising such extra floor; that respondent No.4 has filed O.S.No.513 of 2011 in the Court of the learned IV Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, (for short ‘the civil Court’) against the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (for short ‘the Corporation’) and its officials; and that the civil Court has granted an order of injunction subject to the condition that respondent No.4 constructs the building strictly as per the sanctioned plan. He further submitted that the officials of the respondent-Corporation will make an inspection and take action, in the event, respondent No.4 has been raising constructions in deviation of the sanctioned plan. Learned counsel for respondent No.4 submitted that his client is constructing strictly as per the sanctioned plan and that the Corporation and its officials shall be free to take action in accordance with law, in case, his client is found constructing in deviation of the sanctioned plan. This submission of the learned counsel for respondent No.4 is placed on record. The Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to inspect the premises of respondent No.4 within two weeks from today and take appropriate action in accordance with law, in the event respondent No.4 is found constructing the building in deviation of the sanctioned plan. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.No.29862 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 07th September, 2011 DR