[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4776 OF 2005. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4776 OF 2005. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4776 OF 2005. Grant Medical Fondation ..Petitiner V/s The Maharashtra Pollution Control Board and others. ..Respondents. Mr. S.R. Nargolkar for the petitioner Mr. D.M. Gupte for respondnet No.1. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. J.H. BHATIA, JJ. J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 19TH DECEMBER, 2006. DATE : 19TH DECEMBER, 2006. DATE : 19TH DECEMBER, 2006. P.C. . Consequent of order dated 27/9/2006, we are informed by Mr. Nargolkar, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner -Foundation that as per the requirements of respondent No.4, the petitioner has started taking steps so as to remove all the deficiencies and the installation would be ready within two weeks time. He further emphasises that the installations are being done strictly as per the requirements set out by the respondent No. 4 vis-a- vis the capacity of the hospital with regard to the creation of the waste (for [2] about 500 beds). The respondent will undertake fresh inspection and if it is satisfied the petitioner may proceed to operate these facilities. Undoubtedly, as soon as the installations are over the respondent No.2 is intimated in writing and no further coercive steps will be taken against the petitioner until the inspection is carried out and in any case the inspection is adverse, the petitioner will be protected for further period of two weeks. 2. The petition is disposed in terms of the above directions. (J.H. BHATIA, J.) ( B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.) ( B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.) ( B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.)