IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 16TH OCTOBER 2009 / 24TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 28222 of 2009(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHRI.MOHAN NAIR, RESIDING AT `PRASANTH', FOREST LANE, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP. BY P.A.HOLDER G.MANESH, PANKI KAMALESWARAM, MANACAUD P.O., TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN SRI.M.ANILKUMAR SRI.A.ANOOP RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE. 4. PANAVILAKODU SREE CHAMUNDI DEVI KSHETRAM REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SHRI.RAGHAVAN NADAR, RAKENTHU, MULLOOR P.O., PANAVILAKODU, VIZHINJAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. SHRI.RAMACHANDRAN, S/O.LEKSHMANAN NADAR, SECRETARY, PANAVILAKODU SREE CHAMUNDI DEVI KSHETRAM, THALAKKODU VEEDU, MULLOOR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. SHRI.MANOHARAN, S/O.RAGHAVAN, MEMBER, PANAVILAKODU SREE CHAMUNDI DEVI KSHETRAM, THALAKKODU VEEDU, MULLOOR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 7. SHRI.KUMAR, S/O.BHARGAVAN NADAR, MEMBER, PANAVILAKODU SREE CHAMUNDI DEVI KSHETRAM, THALAKKODU VEEDU, MULLOOR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 8. RAJESH, S/O.THANKARAJAN, MEMBER, PANAVILAKODU SREE CHAMUNDI DEVI KSHETRAM, THALAKKODU VEEDU, MULLOOR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P(C)No.28222/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1. TRUE COPY OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY EXECUTED BY MOHAN NAIR IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2. PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT DT. 26-8-2009 EXT.P3. TRUE COPY OF THE PROPERTY TAX RECEIPTS. / TRUE COPY / P.S.TO JUDGE KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.28222 of 2009 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of October, 2009 JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph,J. Petitioner approached this court seeking protection to the life and property of the petitioner. According to the petitioner he has purchased about 2½ acres of land in Vizhinjam Village for construction of a tourism project. However, the local inhabitants have obstructed to the construction of the compound wall. Learned Government Pleader, on instruction, submits that there is a dispute regarding the pathway leading to the temple. That certainly is a civil dispute. In case of any trespass or encroachment into the property of the petitioner, it is for him to seek appropriate orders from the civil court. Such civil disputes shall not give room for breach of peace in the locality. 2. Despite service of notice there is no appearance. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Police to render necessary protection to the life and property of the W.P(C).No.28222 of 2009 -:2:- petitioner. It is made clear that the direction to give protection to the property of the petitioner will be subject to orders, if any, passed by the civil court regarding the right to use the pathway. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) (C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) ahg. KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. --------------------------- W.P(C).No.28222 of 2009 ---------------------------- JUDGMENT 16th October, 2009