EN TH.E HIGH COURT OF SEKKIM ;F |`~! Bail ORDER SHEET 1cation No.1 ofm 2007 ...Shy.am..Kllmar..SIIbba..............Petitioner/Appellant ersus S State of Sikklm Respondent Seria,I No. of orde:I Order with Signature .07 freseut : Mr. Tachi Norbu Basi, Advocate for the Pedtioner. Mr. J.B. Pradhal}, Public Prosecutor for the State. This is a Bail Application. 'The incident took place on 30th September, 2006. The accused is being prosecuted for having caused sinple hurt with a REukuri to one victim and grievous hurt with the same instrument to Doma `Sherpa his erstwhile wife who is married to the second victim now. It appears that at midnicht the accused found the two sleeping together and caused the hurt. Everything, of course, is under trial and whatever is said here is ab solutely without prdudice. One Bail Appfication "as rejected in Office Note as to action (if any) taken on Order essnonsJ czZz.cz, on the ground that the accused is a flJfl` ¥ Order with Signature office Noieas to t:&tej:no(£%ar€ye)I daily wol.ker and might very weu abscond if granted bail. The second Bail Application was made in February, 2007. The Charge sheet has been fled and trial is going on. The two victins have already been examined. The second Bail Application was directed to be put up after the examination Of the victins. This direction had been given before the examination actually took place, and after the examination, instead Of prajring for a date before the learned Sessions Judge, a fresh bail application has been made beforei the Hish Court. In the State Of Sikfro, there is any backlog of cases, trial is going onand the accused renders co-operation it will b soon over. The leaned Sessions Judge i giving the case his best attention; interferin with the Sessions procedure now would b most unjust and demoralising. discretion in regard to refusal of ball xercise essons Judge is to be /il.rfr i