1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.2194 OF 2004 Rastrawadi Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Union .. Petitioner. Vs. M/s. Bombay Intelligence Security (India) Ltd. & Ors. .. Respondents. .... Mr. P.K. Pawar for the petitioner. Mr. R.D. Suvarna for respondent No.1. Mr. K.S. Bapat for respondent No.2. Smt. Lata Desai for respondent No.3. ... CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. 23rd November, 2004. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents. 2. Perused the affidavit in reply filed on behalf of respondent No.1 dated 2nd April, 2004. In paragraph 10 of the said affidavit in reply, respondent No.1 has stated as under : “ I say and submit that the security guards listed in Exhibit “A” to the petition are in the employment of Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.1 has no intention to terminate the services of the 2 said security guards.” 3. In view of the above, the grievances of the petitioner are fully redressed. Nothing further survives in the petition. The petition is accordingly disposed of. S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.