y '^ HJGH COURT OF CHHAT1 ISOARH AT BIIA8PUR PETITIONER RE8PONDENTS WRTf PETITION (8) No. 4983 of2008 Smt Hiramaiii wifo of Shri Am^rjeet^ ag^l abont 28 years, Resident of Navapara (Mfcihora) Village Panchayat Mahora, Janpad Panchayat Baitountiipur, DistrictKoriya(C.G.) VERSU8 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Women and Child Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The CCTnmissioner, WonKn and Child Development Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Collector, Koriya, District Koriya (C.G.) 4. The Project Officer, Women and Child Developmeiit, Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.) 5. The Chief Executiye OfiBcer, Janpad Pandiayat Baikunfhpun District Koriya (C.G.) 6. Village Panchayat Mahora, 'Ilirough : rfhe Sarpanch, Village Panchayat Mahora, Janpad Paachay^ Baikunthpw, ©istrictKoriva (C.G.) 7. Smt. Sumitra Jaiswal Wife of Shri Shiv Mitthulal Jaiswal, Resident of Vitlage Mahora, Janpad Panchayat Baikunthpur, District Koria (€.G.) wmr pETrnoN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTIJIK^ OFWDIA SB: Hon'blfi Slni Sattsh K. Agnlhotri, J. Present: Shri P.Tiwary, Advocate forthe petitioaer. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Goveniment Advocate forfhe State/ respondent No, 1 to 4. QRALORDER (Passed on 09" day of September, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on in^mctiohs, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merit. H©wever,he seeks permission of tMs Court to make a representatioo befbre the -2- authorifies concemedy ^which may be considered and <teci<ted a^ e3q5editiously as possible. Shri Bhatia, leamed Deputy Govemm^it Advocate submits that m tfae event, a representation is made, ttie same shall be considered in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period offour weeks from fhe date of receipt ofthe representation. In view of the categorical statement made by l^med counsel for the State/respondents 1 to 4, according to leamed counsel appearing for &ie petitioner. nothmg sur^ives in tfais petition. Accordmgly, the petition Mands disposed df. No order asto costs. Consequently, I.A. No. 1, application for gr^at of ad-mterim writ stands disposed o£ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amlt