IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29.3.2011 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition Nos.8093 and 8094 of 2011 ANTHONY STYLES [ PETITIONER IN NO.5 VENKATESWARA NAGAR W.P.NO.8093 OF 2011] VALAYANKADU, GANDHI NAGAR POST TIRUPUR 641 603 REP. BY A.JOSEPH ANTONY PARTNER. ANTHONY GARMENTS PVT. LTD [ PETITIONER IN S.F.NO.351/2 GOVINDAMMAL LAY OUT W.P.NO.8094 OF 2011] VOC NAGAR, VALAYANKADU GANDHI NAGAR POST TIRUPUR 641603 REP. BY A.JOSEPH ANTONY MANAGING DIRECTOR Vs 1 THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER ENFORCEMENT I TIRUPPUR. ...IST RESPONDENT IN W.P.NO.8093/11 1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, ENFORCEMENT III, TIRUPPUR. ...IST RESPONDENT IN W.P.NO.8094/11 2 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT) TIRUPUR (NORTH) ASSESSMENT CIRCLE TIRUPUR. [2ND RESPONDENT IN BOTH THE WRIT PETITIONS] Prayer in W.P.No.8093 of 2011: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the representation dated 25.02.2011 filed by the petitioner seeking refund of the sum of Rs.1,80,000/-. Prayer in W.P.No.8094 of 2011: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the representation dated 25.02.2011 filed by the petitioner seeking refund of the sum of Rs.1,91,232/-. For petitioner : Mr.MD.Ghafoorur Rahman For respondents : Mr.R.Mahadevan Additional Government Pleader https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ C O M M O N O R D E R Mr.R.Mahadevan, the learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents. 2. Though the prayer is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representations, dated 25.2.2011, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representations, dated 25.2.2011, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish copies of the representations, dated 25.2.2011, to the second respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 5. Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar lan To: 1 THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER ENFORCEMENT I TIRUPPUR. 2 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT) TIRUPUR (NORTH) ASSESSMENT CIRCLE TIRUPUR. 3. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, ENFORCEMENT III, TIRUPPUR. 2 cc To Mr.MD.Ghafoorur Rahman, Advocate, SR.22319 & 22320 1 cc To The Special Government Pleader, SR.22813 Writ Petition Nos.8093 and 8094 of 2011 bky(co)pmk.18.4.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/