IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43859 of 2008 SARYUG CHAUDHARY @ LALO CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14.01.2009 Heard Sri S. Jamil Akhtar, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri Dasrath Mehta, APP for the State. As may appear from the FIR and some paragraphs of the case diary like 9, 14, 15 the petitioner was giving blows with sickle to the father of the informant, so as to killing him. It is true that a petition was filed by the informant indicating that it may not be the petitioner and it could be another man, but regard being had to the consistency of material in the case diary, I am not inclined to direct the release of the petitioner on bail. The petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after the informant and the doctor are examined in the trial. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)