IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 433 of 2008 Shashikala Rajpal Bahot ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Mr Subhash Hulyalkar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr S.S. Pednekar, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V. C. DAGA,J. V. C. DAGA,J. V. C. DAGA,J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 11.3. 2008. 11.3. 2008. 11.3. 2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. None for the applicant. 2. No sufficient cause is made out for seeking adjournment. Consequently prayer made for the applicant is rejected. 3. Perused application and material available on record. 4. Learned A.P.P. submits that the trial is still on and that the same is likely to be concluded within two weeks. In this view of the matter, I do not see any reason to entertain this application. Application is, thus, rejected. (V.C. (V.C. (V.C. DAGA,J.) DAGA,J.) DAGA,J.)