-: 1 :- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1006 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 831 OF 2008 Amit H. Mehta & Anr. ..Plaintiffs. Versus Subhadra D. Koli & Ors. ..Defendants. Mr. Y. S. Bhate and Mr. Shyam K. Sthalekar for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Piyush Shah for defendant no.4. Ms. Suvarna Pratap i/b Ms. S. Kumbhat for defendant no.3. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : February 17, 2010. P. C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. This chamber summons is taken out by the plaintiffs seeking leave to amend plaint in terms of schedule annexed to the chamber summons. 2. The plaintiffs have filed above suit for declaration that the alleged agreement between defendant nos. 1 & 2 and defendant no.4 in respect of the suit property is illegal, unlawful and not binding upon the plaintiffs. It is stated in the affidavit in support of Chamber summons that the plaintiffs could not give particulars of the above agreement between defendant nos. 1 & 2 and defendant no.4 for want of knowledge. The plaintiffs came to know about the particulars of aforesaid agreement in pursuance of the order dated 20th February 2008 passed by this Court in Notice of Motion -: 2 :- No. 1077 of 2007 and thereafter by way of present chamber summons, the plaintiffs want to amend the plaint so as to give better particulars. The plaintiffs want to add prayer clauses to quash and set aside the above said agreement. In my opinion, the proposed amendment is not contrary to or inconsistent with the original pleadings in plaint and same also does not change the nature of suit. In that view of the matter and for the reasons stated in affidavit-in-support, chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The plaintiffs shall carry out necessary amendments within the period of two weeks from today and thereafter within the period of two weeks shall serve the amended copy of plaint on all concerned. (R.V. MORE, J.)