i.^riJS^ V,' ^j? •3 •^>. JS THE BIGH C©UKT 0F »B)Hy& PB&BSSH M JABALP13B» Writ PefitioB Bio.^kJ -^®f PETITI6M TOBERAEffieLES 226 OF THE 1. eassrrrtma QF-xasi&.f PartieBlars ®f tte ?et3.ti©BersA- (1}* Barg Bus Serviee^ (P) Ltd»» S»E*aaad, :-£-1 ^ (2)< Navia Traasport* BaRi» j -Versas- Partieialars of tfae (1).: BegioRai Tra&sport Aaihority» Baigar. (2). t(/s AiEiand BeadwaySy 3* Pastieala.cs of the QSdes agaiBSt which tbe PetitioR is nade!- '- To quash the orders of the BoT.Aai Baipur dated 4»7»94asd to issue writ of aaBe>an8s to the BespoadeHt K®.1to grant the Stage Carriage PenRits te the Petitiaaers OB roate BajraandgaoR te Bbaarbari as applted fQEs 4» BelaylBfiltiBg'thepeta.tlaB.ifaiayanel'tfae exiEtlanal-i.QB fer Ui* if anyj- The Beiitlea has beety fited agatost the ©rders dated 4.7«914. Tbere is B®delay ia tiling /fche Ee-fi-fclOBS .^' ^s i.K Ki ^' XI-HC-22 STI^TqiT R-ficbsn^T stiiIiiHfiw < . •\ 2-a)Tpp- ierf^ 3^- s^'.qprraq', ssiTn^'Ko, Rxnitfy Sil^VI ^sicb *4iw'nst>tiic»> AOfl^ f^% sn^TgHITWCTf^tT 7.7-2W5 Mr. B.K. Rawat, eounsel for the p^Uioners. Mr. Sunll Otnani, Panel Lawyer for fte Stete/respondent No.1. l-1eard both the eounsel. Leamed ceunsel for the petitioners submite ftrat the matter has become infructuous. In view of the statement made by leamed counsal for the petiUoners, th® writ petiBon is dismissed as havlng become infructuous. — . v ^ Sd/» L.C. Bhadoo Judge °bi'I<fcf.'>fl-< Hi>i<iTffteI3'<Ri+t;i< ^ari^Tsn^T x'\ r' (<fl^^^) ^^