IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 16TH DECEMBER 2011 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 1266 of 2011(S) ------------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.19257/2011 Dated 15/07/2011 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN W.P.(C) ---------------------------------------------------------- S.G.APPUKUTTAN,AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.GANGADHARAN,SRAMBIKKAL HOUSE,CHERAI.P.O,VYPIN, NOW WORKING AS SALESMAN,VYASA STORE,MATSYAFED, MURIKUMPADAM. BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE SRI.A.V.JOJO RESPONDENT(S): 2ND RESPONDENT IN W.P.(C) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- S.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR,(FATHER'S NAME AND AGED NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER),THE GENERAL MANAGER,KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE FEDERATION FOR FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT LTD.,(MATSYAFED), KAMALESWARAM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 009. BY ADV. SMT.K.P.SANTHI,SC, MATSYAFED THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts COC.NO.1266/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEX A1 COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT DATED 15/7/11 IN WP(C)NO.19257/2011 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA. ANNEX A2 COPY OF THE FORWARDING LETTER DATED 4/8/2011. ANNEX A3 COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ---------------------------------------------- Cont.Case (C) No. 1266 of 2011 against WP(C) No.19257 of 2011 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT This Contempt Case is filed alleging that the respondent herein who is the General Manager the Matsyafed has willfully disobeyed the directions issued by this Court in Annexure A1 judgment. 2. When the contempt case came up for hearing today, Sri.A.X.Varghese, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that though belatedly the respondent has by order passed on 24.11.2011 disposed of Ext.P3 representation. In such circumstances, as the respondent has passed orders though belatedly, I find no reason to proceed with this contempt case. It is accordingly closed recording the submission made on behalf of the the learned counsel for the petitioner that the direction issued by this Court has been complied with. Sd/- P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. Rkc //true copy// PA to Judge.