Sr. No. Date t Orders % 30.09.2005 Present ; Nr. V.K. Makhija, Sr. .Advocate with. Ms. Vandana Khurana, Advocate for the Plaintiff. Mr. Rajiv Yadav, Advocate for Defendant N.o.2. Mr. jagdeep Anand, advocate for defendant iSio.3. Mr. Shailendra PauL Advocate for defendants 4, 5 and 6. -flA No 7631/2004 ( 0 39 R 2A CPC) in Test Cas ia/2004 * Learned . counsel for defendant No.3 states that defendant No.3 was and continues to be in possession of property bearing No.H-3/11 Mode! Town, Delhi. Learned counsel further states that defendant No.3 was using the premises sometime for storage of his goods but that stands removed and now he or his daughter stays there. !n view of the aforesaid position, no further directions are called for on this application. The application stands disposed of. Test. Cas. 18/2004 This is a petition seeking probate of the will of late Shri Sat Narain Tulsian dated 26.01.2003. Late Shri Tulsian passed away on 06.02.2003 and his death certificate is attached to the petition which is not disputed by the respondents. The movable and immovable assets which are dealt with under the will have been stated in Annexures A to C of the petition. SACHKHANDPRINTERS 01/05 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified Late Shri Tulsian was suivived by the petitionerand otherlegal heirs mentionedin para5of the petition. Along wiih the petitionaffidavitsof no objectionwere alreadyfiled by two daughters of iate Shri Tulsian. Th.e three sons and two grandsonsfrom the fourth son are the beneficiariesunder the will who had entered into an agreement dated 22.02.2003. affirming to the will. it is stated that the deceasedwas a residentof Delhi and owned properties in Delhi. The probate petition is not opposed. The affidavitby way of evidencewas filed of Shri Hari Baby Goel one of the attesting witnesses who has also appeared in Court and affirm.edto the affidaviton 31.08.2005. The will dated 26.01.2003 is exhibited PW 1/1. The attesting witness has deposed that on point 'A on the will late Shn Sat Narain Tulsian penned his signatures in the presence of the attestingwitness and the attestingwitness signed at point 'C' on the will in the presenceof the testatorand other attesting witnessShri Ajay Bansal had signedon point'B' in his presence. There is no executor of the will. jn view of the aforesaid.!am satisfiedthat there is no impedimentto the grantof letterof administrationwitii the will annexed dated 26:91:2QQ3: —— — 01/05 SACHKHANDPRINTERS H.C.D.-I(a) Continuation Sheet >>• Sr. No. Date 'P ,.U Orders Notice have been issued to the Chief Controller, Revenue, but no objectionsto the valuation as stated in the petition have been filed. in view thereof, the petitioner shall pay the requisite court fee and on such court fees being paid the letter of administrationannexingthe will be issued underSection278 of the Indian Succession .Act. The petition stands disposed of. iA NQ.1936/2Q05 In view of the letter of administration having been granted,no directionsarecalledfor in thisapplication. The applicationstands disposed of. September 30, 2005 mb SANJA.Y KISHAN KAUL, j. fiih l-f) J'iUbf