IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 8TH MAY 2009 / 18TH VAISAKHA 1931 WP(C).No. 13377 of 2009(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- VIJAYAKUMARI, KALIYIL PUTHEN VEEDU, NEDUVATHOOR, KOTTARAKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOLLAM. 2. CHELLAPPAN PILLAI, ALUMVILA VEEDU, NILESWARAM.P.O., KOTTARAKKARA. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ANTONY MUKKATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No.13377 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 8th May,2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by Exhibit-P2 order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer allegedly requiring the petitioner to remove the rubber trees planted in her property on the ground that they were planted and cultivated in contravention of the provisions of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order. Exhibit-P2 is challenged on various grounds including absence of notice. 2. I heard learned Government Pleader also. 3. The petitioner has objected to Exhibit-P2 vide Exhibit-P3. In my view, Exhibit-P2 need only be treated as a show cause notice and the Revenue Divisional Officer shall proceed to consider Exhibit-P3 and pass a final order under the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, after hearing the petitioner as also the complainant before the Revenue Divisional Officer and if necessary after making W.P ( C) No.13377 of 2009 2 a local inspection within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.13377 of 2009 3 W.P ( C) No.13377 of 2009 4