IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1991 of 2010 ARBIND YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 07.04.2010 Heard Mr. N.K.Agrawal, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kahalgaon P.S.Case No.440 of 2009 originally registered under Section 394 of the I.P.C, but subsequently offence under Section 302/34 was also added. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that he is not named in the F.I.R. as an accused and even during course of investigation, no legal materials have been collected by the I.O. to connect him with the offence in question. According to him, only material against the petitioner is that one so-called spy has named him also as an accused in the present case. Learned counsel for the State has pointed out that this is a case of highway robbery and Rs. 85,000/- was looted from Sunil Kumar and thereafter he was shot dead. It is further pointed out that investigation is still going on and in a 2 case like this, custodial interrogation of the accused persons is a must. In that view of the matter, prayer for anticipatory bail made on behalf of petitioner is dismissed. He must surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and may seek regular bail. If such a prayer is made, then that shall be disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. V.K. Pandey (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)