IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC No.: 143 of 2009. Decided on: 14.09.2010. __________________________________________________________ Hukam Singh. … Petitioner. Versus A.S. Gill. … Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Ajeet Saklani, Advocate vice Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): The present petition has become infructuous in view of order dated 28th July, 2010 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in L.P.A. No.128 of 2008. 2. Consequently, the present petition closed as infructuous. However, it is left open to the petitioner to prefer appropriate application for pension as per observations made by the Division Bench in its judgment dated 28th July, 2010. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 14, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?