BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Fourth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.S.KARNAN CRL OP(MD) No.13404 of 2011 SANGEETHA ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUMANGALAM TOWN POLICE STATION, CR.NO. 552/2011 U/s.171e & 188 IPC ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. J.GUNASHEELAN MUTHIAH Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, Addl.Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 171 e and 188 I.P.C., in Crime No.522 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was preparing to arrange meals with mutton to voters. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioner is nine month pregnant lady and she has nothing to do with the offence and she will not abscond or evade any due process of law and she never tamper with the witnesses and hence, prayed for anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would oppose the move for anticipatory bail. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of the allegations made against the petitioner and also the fact that the petitioner is a pregnant lady, this Court is of the view that anticipatory bail could be granted to the second petitioner with certain conditions. 6. Accordingly, the second petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of her arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tirumangalam and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. Sd/- 04/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUMANGALAM 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUMANGALAM TOWN POLICE STATION, MADURAI 3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. J.GUNASHEELAN MUTHIAH Advocate SR.No.34903 ssk/10.10.2011 /5c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13404 of 2011 Date :04/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/