1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3869 OF 2009 (Hitendra s/o Jagdish Chatre vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr. A.P.Bhandari, Adv., h/f Mr. S.V.Gangapurwala, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. R.P.Phatke, Additional G.P., for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Mr. D.S.Bagul, Adv., for respondent no.3. Mr.S.G.Chapalgaonkar, Adv., for respondent no.5. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE :9th NOVEMBER, 2009. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner is praying that in view of clause (10) of the advertisement dt.3rd May, 2008, he being at Sr.No.1 in the waiting list, being Scheduled Caste candidate, ought to have been appointed, as one seat is vacant. 3. The respondent filed affidavit-in- reply. They are placing reliance on the Government Resolution dt.10th Oct.,1980. 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders 4. Considering the reply filed and the Government Resolution, we find that the waiting list was in operation for one year only, which period has already elapsed. 5. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner approached this Court before expiry of period of one year but, that by itself, would not materially affect the case. 6. In case fresh advertisement is issued, the petitioner would be entitled to apply and participate in the selection process. The petition, therefore, stands dismissed. [K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] [NARESH H.PATIL, J.] agp/wp3869-09