IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14465 of 2009 SURYAKANT KUMAR, Son of Kamdeo Prasad, resident of village- Mahamadpur Tola Kharar, P.S.-Sherghati, District-Gaya. ……….Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Gaya. 4. The District Development Commissioner, Gaya. 5. The District Superintendent of Education, Gaya. 6. The Block Education Extension Officer, Sherghatti, Gaya. 7. The Block Agriculture Officer, Sherghatti, Gaya. 8. The Block Development Officedr, Sherghatti, Gaya. 9. Mukhiya Gopalpur, Panchayat Block Sherghatti, District-Gaya. 10. Principal Rajkiya Prathmik Vidyalaya, Riji Ganj, Sherghatti, Gaya. 11. Vishundeo Kumar, Son of Sukhdeo Yadav, resident of Sonokha, P.S.- Sherghatti, District-Gaya. ………Respondents. For the petitioner: Fauzia Shakil, Adv. For the State: Mr. Ravi Verma, Adv. AC to G.P.-15. ----------- 2/ 03.02.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the State. Petitioner was selected for the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra in the year 2005. He continued for eleven months, on expiry of eleven months, petitioner’s case was considered along with others but he was not given further extension, one Vishundeo Kumar having higher marks, was selected. The selection of Vishundeo Kumar was not challenged by the petitioner. The counsel for the petitioner submits that on 26.09.2006 an objection had been filed by the petitioner before the District Magistrate, Gaya, but, that remained pending and till date it has not been disposed off. The petitioner, not being selected for the post of Siksha - 2 - Mitra, was not continuing on the post on 01.07.2006 and as such not absorbed on the post of Panchayat Teacher. After three years, this writ application has been filed challenging the selection of Vishundeo Kumar as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra, which is not maintainable. In case petitioner’s objection is pending before the Collector, he should represent for recommendation of his objection to the Appellate Tribunal for redressal of his grievance. This application is dismissed. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)