{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1150 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.104 OF 2009 Seetabai Shrimant Tolaji Yetale APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. A.B.Gaikwad, Advocate for applicant Mr. N.B.Patil, APP for respondent State Mr.R.J.Nirmal, Advocate for respondent No.2 ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 10th March 2010 PER COURT: 1. By this application the applicant has prayed to condone the delay of 54 days caused in preferring revision against the judgment and order of acquittal rendered in criminal appeal No.23/2005 on 18.11.2009. It is urged that the delay is caused as the counsel is required to be appointed from the panel of legal aid committee. In the premise, delay needs to be condoned. In the result the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause “A” and “B” and stands disposed of. Delay is condoned. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln1150-09