IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 26555 of 2008 Between: U. Sudheendra, S/o. Sri Gururaja Achar, r/o. D.No. 4-507, Sri Guru Anugraha, Opp : Bus Stand, Manthralayam, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 2 The Tahsildhar, Manthralayam, Kurnool District. 3 The Panchayat Officer, Manthralayam Gram Panchayat, Manthralayam, Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of the respondents herein in not considering the representation of the petitioner dt. 4-11-2008 filed before the 1st respondent and representations dt. 6-8-2008 filed before the 2nd and 3rd respondent and not taking action to stop the encroachments and illegal construction as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representations of the petitioner dt. 4-11-2008 and 6-8-2008 respectively and take appropriate action on the same and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.YADAVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: The writ petition is filed alleging inaction on the part of the respondents upon the representation of the petitioner dated 4.11.208 asserting encroachments into Zilla Parishad land by one Sri N.Venkateshwarlu in Manthralayam Gram Panchayat. By the order of this Court dated 1.6.2009, the impleaded 4th respondent – District Collector was directed to immediately take action for removal of the encroachments and file a report by today. The Learned Government Pleader for Revenue placed before this Court a letter addressed by the 4th respondent dated 29.6.2009 received by the office of the Government Pleader stating that the encroacher has himself removed the encroachments after receiving notice under the A.P. Land Encroachment Act. In this light of this development, the petitioner does not wish to pursue the matter further. The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. ___________ 01-07-2009 asp