IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 24TH JANUARY 2011 / 4TH MAGHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 615 of 2011() ---------------------------------------- CP.NO.46/2010 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT II, ERNAKULAM. ...... (CRIME NO.1054/2005 OF THE CENTRAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT). .... PETITIONER (S): ACCUSED NO.3 AND 4: ------------------------------------------------------------- 1. JIJO THOMAS, S/O.THOMAS V.J., VELUTHAMANONGAL HOUSE, K.N.PUDUR, KANJIKKODE PO, PALAKKAD. 2. SURESH.R., S/O. RAMANATHAN, V.V.K.NAGAR, K.N.PUDUR, KANJIKKODE PO, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No.615 of 2011 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 24.01.2011 ORDER Petitioners, who are accused Nos.3 and 4 in S.C.No.613 of 2010 on the file of the Additional Assistant Sessions Court, Ernakulam, seek anticipatory bail. 2. Admittedly non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioners. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioners should not surrender before the Court below and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioners surrender before the court below and file an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of, preferably, on the same date on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioners. This Bail Application is, accordingly, disposed of. Dated this the 24 th day of January, 2011 V. RAMKUMAR,(JUDGE) sj