IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 3106 of 2011 Date of decision: 10.5.2011 M/s C.G.Properties Pvt. Ltd., Chandigarh … Petitioner versus The Federal Bank through its Manager, Panchkula … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit for possession by way of ejectment and damages, titled as C.G. Properties Private Limited through its Director Rajeev Chhabra v. The Federal Bank through its Branch Manager. Petitioner is aggrived with order dated 5.4.2011 passed by the Additional Civil Judge(Sr.Division), Panchkula, by dint of which its application for summoning of the official of the Estate Office, HUDA, Panchkula, along with record by way of additional evidence has been dismissed. Heard. The present application has been moved at the stage when the case is fixed for rebuttal evidence and arguments. There is no dispute that the discretion vests in the Court to permit a party to produce any evidence at a later stage by way of additional evidence if the Court is satisfied that the evidence was not within his knowledge or could not be produced despite the due diligence. However, in the instant case, plaintiff is absolutely silent as to what evidence it intends to place on record by way of additional evidence which is obligatory on its part and only then the Court can show indulgence but the same is missing in the instant case. In C.R. No. 3106 of 2011 -2- this back-drop of the facts, the application has been rightly dismissed by the trial Court. No interference is called for. The revision petition is hereby dismissed. May 10, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE