IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 26TH JULY 2011 / 4TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 17235 of 2011(D) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- PARENT TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, PALATHOL AUP SCHOOL, ELAMKULAM, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, SRI.MANOJ KUMAR.K. BY ADV. SRI.K.PRAVEEN KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MALAPPURAM - 676 505. 2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PERINTHALMANNA - 679 322. 3. K.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR, HINDI TEACHER, PALATHOL AUP SCHOOL, ELAMKULAM, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 679 322. 4. THE HEADMASTER, AUP SCHOOL, ELAMKULAM, PERINTHALMANNA - 679 322. 5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM - 679 322. R1,R2 & R5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. V. VIJULAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.17235/2011 D APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE NOTICE SENT BY THE TAHSILDAR AND CENSUS CHARGE OFFICER, PERINTHALMANNA TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT ON 19/2/2011. P2: COPY OF THE LETTER SENT BY THE TAHSILDAR AND CENSUS CHARGE OFFICER, PERINTHALMANNA TO THE HEADMASTER DTD. 5/03/2011. P3: COPY OF THE LETTER SENT BY THE HEADMASTER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 7/03/2011. P4: COPY OF THE NOTICE SENT BY THE DISTRICT CENSUS OFFICER AND DEPUTY COLLECTOR (GENERAL) MALAPPURAM TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD. 8/03/2011. P5: COPY OF THE LETTER SENT BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD. 11/03/2011. P6: COPY OF THE LETTER SENT BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT DTD. 17/03/2011. P7: COPY OF THE LETTER SENT BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ELAMKULAM DTD. 22/03/2011. P8: COPY OF THE LETTER SENT BY THE PETITIONER AND ASSOCIATION MEMBERS TO THE EDUCATIONAL AUTHORITIES DTD. 16/03/2011. P9: COPY OF THE LETTER ENT BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 31/03/2011. P10: COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION SENT BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 5/04/2011. P11: COPY OF THE REPLY SENT BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DTD. 5/04/2011. P12: COPY OF THE NOTICE SENT BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT DTD. 7/04/2011. P13: COPY OF THE NOTICE SENT BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT DTD.7/04/2011. P14: COPY OF THE LETTER SENT BY THE HEADMISTRESS AND STAFF OF THE SCHOOL TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 16/05/2011. P15: COPY OF THE LETTER SENT BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 16/11/2011. P16: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 17/06/2011. P17: COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE MINUTES. P18: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.NO.15486/11 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.17235/2011-D ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 26th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a Parents-Teachers Association of A.U.P School, Palathol near Perinthalmanna in Malappuram District. 2. The third respondent is the Hindi Teacher of the school in question. The allegation raised in the writ petition is that the third respondent had developed some Psychiatric problems and has been behaving in an abnormal manner for the last few months. It is also averred that he is addicted to alcohol and used to come to school after consuming the same. Several complaints have been raised before the Headmistress also. It is pointed out that the said activities of the third respondent is causing concern to the parents. Petitioner also points out certain dereliction of duties of the said respondent in connection with the census duties entrusted to him. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that Ext.P16 representation has been W.P.(C). No.17235/2011 -:2:- submitted before the second respondent and he may be directed to the consider the grievances therein. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, the third respondent has been placed under suspension for various reasons. 4. I am not going into the merits of the matter. The petitioner-Association is only projecting their grievances in the light of the alleged problems created by the third respondent. The third respondent may have a different case also. In the light of the allegations raised against the third respondent, the second respondent will conduct due enquiry with notice to the petitioner and the third respondent. It is upto the second respondent to go into the veracity of the complaints. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. The petitioner will forward a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of the Judgment to the second respondent for compliance. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms