1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16396 of 2011 1 R. RAGURAMAN 2 T. NATARAJ ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEELAKARAI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT CR NO. 163/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.SURESH Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as A1 & A2 and they prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) I.P.C., in Crime No.163 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.Heard Mr.S.Suresh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, stringent conditions may be imposed for the secured presence of the petitioners. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I could see that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 15/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, RAMANATHAPURAM. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEELAKARAI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. S.SURESH Advocate SR.No.44022 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16396 of 2011 Date :15/12/2011 RJ/19.12.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/