CWP(T) No. 7020 of 2008 27.09.2010 Present: Mr. S. S. Sood, Advocate, vice Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents/State. According to Mr. S. S. Sood, learned counsel for the petitioner the matter in issue is squarely covered by a decision rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in Baldev Singh and others Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others {Latest HLJ 2009 (HP) 293} qua relief No. 3 and decision rendered by this Court in CWP(T) No. 781 of 2008, titled as Rakesh Chand versus State of H.P. and others, decided on 15.6.2010 qua reliefs No. 1 and 2. 2. There is no dispute that for the period 1.1.1999 to 15.2.1999 and 1.1.2000 to 15.2.2000 petitioner has not been paid salary for the winter vacation period. In terms of Baldev Singh (supra) petitioner is entitled to the same. Hence direction is issued qua relief of salary for winter vacation shall mutatis mutandis apply to the instant case. 3. Qua reliefs No. 1 and 2 it has been brought to the notice of this Court by Sh. Vikas Rathore, learned Deputy Advocate General that operation of the judgment dated 15.6.2010 passed in Rakesh Chand (supra) has been stayed in L.P.A. No. 105 of 2010, titled as State versus Rakesh Chand. Hence no relief can be granted to the petitioner from the strength of Rakesh Chand (supra). However, if ultimately the -2- employees are held entitled for the same it shall be open for them to approach the respondents for the same. With the aforesaid observations the present petition is disposed of. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. September 27, 2010 (PK)