IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25806 of 2010 DIPU KUMAR @ BACHHI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.07.2010. On 17.05.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 14092 of 2010, the petitioner was granted regular bail in a case registered under Sections 399,402,414 of the I.P.C. and Section 25(1- B)A/26, 35 of the Arms Act in connection with Alamnagar P.S. Case No. 276 of 2009 on the ground that only two mobiles were recovered from possession of the petitioner. But since there was no statement with regard to the criminal antecedent of the petitioner hence a direction was issued to the learned Magistrate not to accept the bail bond of the petitioner if on verification it is found that the petitioner is not an accused in similar nature of the case or cases. Since the petitioner is also involved in another case being Alamganj P.S. Case No. 265 of 2009 under Section 379 and other Sections of the I.P.C. Hence the bail bonds of the petitioner were not accepted by the learned Magistrate, giving rise to the present application. It is submitted by the learned counsel 2 for the State that during investigation it was found that the petitioner is involved in another case. Considering the fact that the petitioner from whose possession two mobiles were recovered and the fact that the petitioner has been punished by remaining in custody for further two months for not disclosing his criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, Dipu Kumar @ Bachhi be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Patna City, in connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 276 of 2009. The learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner fails to appear on three consecutive dates or gets himself involved in similar kind of case henceforth. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)