IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No. 3532 of 2005 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : AUGUST 4, 2009 SHRI AJAIB SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Surinder Gandhi, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior DAG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) CM 12029 of 2009 has been filed for withdrawal of the main petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the claim for retiral benefits was rejected by the respondents and, therefore, the writ petition came to be filed. At this stage, however, the respondents are ready to consider the case of the petitioner, however, pendency of the petition is Civil Writ Petition No. 3532 of 2005 (O&M) 2 an impediment. In view of the above, on the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition, in case the claim of the petitioner is again rejected. August 4, 2009 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?