[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL W.P.NO.1473 OF 2008 S.V.S.Raghavan ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.T.J.Pandian advocate for Petitioner Ms.Leena Sapra Adv. for Respondent no.2 ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : OCTOBER 8, 2008 DATE : OCTOBER 8, 2008 DATE : OCTOBER 8, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. The learned advocate for the petitioner has stated that petitioner is only pressing the prayer at this stage that trial in Case Nos.2579/SS/05 and in the other connmected 10 cases bearing Nos. 212/SS/05, 251/SS/05, 585/SS/05, 1765/SS/05, 2357/SS/05, 2567/SS/05, 2614/SS/05, 2615/SS/05, 3148/SS/05 and 3149/SS/05 pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 6th Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai be expedited. The said cases are [-2-] under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and are pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 6th Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai. The learned advocate for the respondent-orignial complainant has no objection to the said prayer being granted. In this view of the matter, the trial in the above cases i.e. 2579/SS/05, 212/SS/05, 251/SS/05, 585/SS/05, 1765/SS/05, 2357/SS/05, 2567/SS/05, 2614/SS/05, 2615/SS/05, 3148/SS/05 and 3149/SS/05 pending before the learned Metroplitan Magistrate, 6th Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai is expedited and the same be completed as far as possible by 1.3.2009. 3. Petition is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]