^siQiE SErifr? ^(^ ^zr? (£ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. fSI No. ?-f\^-- /2007 PETITIONER ^ Shankerlal Soni S/o. Shri Moti Lal Soni Aged about 50 years Post- Assistant Teacher, Govt. Girls Primary School Ulda, R/o. Village - Hamalpara, Tahsil Kharsia District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^' >o r" ,^^ -'^ \.'.; ;1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary -;??" ..-• Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) / 2, District Education Officer, Raigrh, District Raigarh (C.G.) ;3. Block Education Officer Block-Kharsia District-Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI ;AND FOR OTHER^UITABI.E WRITS AND DIRECTIONS HI6H COURT OF CHH^TTISSARH AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR,_SATISH_K. A^slIHOTRI. J. Petitioner WRIT PETtTION (S.) No.292 OF 2007 Shanker la! Soni yersus Respondents Stateof Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner WRIT PETmON (S.) No.293 OF 2007 Yad Ram Patel Respondents Petitioner ResDondents Petitioner ftespondents versus State of Chhaftisgarh and others versus Smt. Vimla &evi Bhaqat State of Chhattisgarh cmd others PETIUON (S.) No.297 OF bayaram Verma versus State (Sovt. of Chhattisgarh and others Present : AAr. Anil Mourya, Mr. Sanjay Patel, and Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner(s). Mr. Sushil Dubey, iSovernment Advocate, Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. 2.3 J >th (Passed on this 19Tn Day of January, 2007) Learned counsei qipearing for the petitloners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of iaw involved in the present writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj vs. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar BharadwaJ (Supra), subject to yerification of fhe fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per 1-he circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether they have been paid two adyance increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on the record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006 (H) MPJR-C6 96 Thakur f