IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23045 of 2010 VINAY SAH, SON OF SRI NANHE SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- CHARPOKHRI, P.S- CHARPOKHRI, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR. ……….PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. ………OPPOSITE PARTY . ----------- 03/ 15.11.2010 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as also taking into account the earlier order passed by this court dated 16.12.2009, in Cr. Miscellaneous No.42814 of 2009 rejecting the prayer for bail of the petitioner, while this court is still not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner but then having noticed the two reports of the trial Court one dated 24.08.2010 and the other dated 04.10.2010, it now becomes necessary to direct the trial Court to ensure trial of the petitioner must be concluded on or before 30.06.2011, by which period the petitioner would also be completing a period of two years of his jail-custody. If however the trial of the petitioner is not completed solely due to laches on the part of prosecution, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail before this Court but he must enclose the entire upto date ordersheet of trial of the trial Court from the date charges have been framed 2 against him. Let a copy of this order be also sent both to the trial Court as well as to the Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur to ensure that trial Sessions Case No. 18 of 2010 arising out of Charpokhri P.S Case No. 55 of 2009 is concluded positively in the aforementioned period i.e on or before 30.06.2011. With the aforementioned observation and direction this application is disposed off. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)