IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 4696 of 2009 Date of Decision: March 25, 2009 Bhola Ram ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. Balkar Singh, Advocate for Mr.Ashok Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he would be satisfied if the notice Annexure P-3 sent by his client is decided by respondent No.3 by passing a speaking order thereon. I find this to be a fair request. In the circumstances without going into the merits respondent No.3 is directed to decide the notice Annexure P-3 of the petitioner by passing a speaking order thereon within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. With the above said direction this petition is disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE March 25, 2009 sunita C.W.P. No. 4693 of 2009 Present: Mr. Ashwani Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. *** Admitted. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE March 25, 2009 sunita C.W.P. No. 4686 of 2009 Present: Mr. I.P.Goyat, Advocate for the petitioner. *** Adjourned to 31.03.2009. To be heard along with CWP No. 21152 of 2008. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE March 25, 2009 sunita C.W.P. No. 3990 of 2009 Present: Mr. R.B.Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. *** Admitted. Learned counsel for the petitioner is granted liberty to move an application for early hearing on the conclusion of the criminal trial. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE March 25, 2009 sunita C.W.P. No. 3108 of 2009 Present: Mr. Harsh Kinra, Advocate for the petitioner. *** While arguing learned counsel for the petitioner has restricted his claim that the period during which his client did not join the service be treated not as duty period but at least as leave of the kind due. Notice of motion. Mr.Harish Rathee, Senior DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to supply four copies of the writ petition to the learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana during the course of the day. Mr. Rathee prays for four weeks' time to file the written statement. Replication, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter. To come up before the learned Registrar (Judicial-II) for completion of pleadings on 25.05.2009. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE March 25, 2009 sunita CM No. 4800 of 2009 in C.W.P. No. 1573 of 2007 Present: Mr. Vijay Kumar Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner. *** Notice of the application to the respondents. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 3 and seeks three weeks' time to respond thereto. To come up on 23.04.2009. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE March 25, 2009 sunita CM No. 4555 of 2009 in C.W.P. No. 11561 of 2002 Present: Mr. Puneet Bali, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner. *** Notice of the application to the respondents. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana accepts on behalf of the respondents and seeks two weeks' time to file response thereto. To come up on 01.05.2009. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE March 25, 2009 sunita C.W.P. No. of 200 Present: Mr. , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE March 25, 2009 sunita