Civil Revision No.5043 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5043 of 2010 Date of decision: 12.08.2010 Punjabi Purusharthi Sabha .....Petitioner Versus Mitter Sain and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA Present:- Mr. Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. VINOD K.SHARMA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to challenge the order dated 2.6.2010, passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ferozepur Jhirka, vide which the evidence of the petitioner was ordered to be closed by passing the following order: - “No PW is present today. Today the case was fixed for deemed to close for plaintiff evidence. Hence, plaintiff evidence is hereby closed by Court Order. Now, the case is adjourned to 26.7.2010 for evidence of defendants.” Learned counsel for the petitioner does not contest the case on merits and prays that in the interest of justice, the petitioner be granted one last opportunity to conclude its entire evidence, subject to payment of costs. In view of the stand taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court feels that it would be in the interest of justice if the petitioner is granted one last opportunity to conclude its entire evidence at its own risk and responsibility on the date to be fixed by the learned Civil Revision No.5043 of 2010 -2- trial Court. “Ordered accordingly.” However, this shall be subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) as costs. Disposed off. (Vinod K. Sharma) Judge August 12, 2010 R.S.