IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22219 of 2009 DOMI MUKHIYA, SON OF LATE DARSAN MUKHIYA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NARAINPUR, P.S. BAPTIYAHI, DISTRICT SUPAUL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under sections 25(1-B) A and 26 of the Arms Act. As per the prosecution case, when the petitioner was apprehended in connection with a pending sessions trial, a country made pistol was recovered from his possession for which this separate case has been instituted. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the petitioner was apprehended in connection with the said sessions trial, the police has set up another case against him. In this case petitioner has remained in custody since 5.4.2009. So far as that sessions trial is concerned, petitioner has been remanded in that case and he is facing the trial and even if he is granted bail in this case, he will remain in custody in the said sessions trial unless and until the competent court passes order for his - 2 - release. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner (Domi Mukhiya) is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Bhaptiyahi P.S. Case No.15/09. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)