IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30948 of 2010 1. SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH @ SANTOSH SINGH S/O DINANATH SINGH 2. ARVIND SINGH S/O RAM JATAN SINGH, BOTH ARE R/O VILLAGE-CHAUKHARA, P.S. AURANGABAD (M) DISTRICT-AURANGABAD --PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY 2 21.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The two petitioners are named accused in this case and appears denied bail by the learned Incharge Sessions Judge only in view of Section 18 of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The case appears covered by the decision of Supreme Court in the case of Gorige Pentaiah Vrs. State of Andhra Pradesh; (2008) 12 SCC 531. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in 2 Aurangabad (M) P.S. Case no.58 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with additional condition that the petitioners shall remain present before the court below on each and every date for one year or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. If the petitioners fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad