IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND FEBRUARY 2011 / 13TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 3340 of 2011(N) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- ARUNADEVI, D/O.MALLU, AGED 48 YEARS, ALINGAL HOUSE, VEMBOLI, PUDUSSERY P.O., PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SUB COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD, OFFICE OF THE SUB COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD-678 001. 3. TAHSILDAR, OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDAR, PALAKKAD TALUK-678 001. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PUDUSSERY WEST VILLAGE, PUDUSSERY, PALAKKAD-678 007. 5. PARU, W/O.APPU, KALLANPARAMBU, VENOLI, PUDUSSERY, PALAKKAD TALUK & DISTRICT-678 007. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/02/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 3340 of 2011 N ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner complains about the inaction on the part of the respondents in evicting the fifth respondent from the puramboke land in her occupation. According to the petitioner, in view of Exts.P1 to P6, the fifth respondent is liable to be evicted from the said land and, therefore, the inaction complained is unjustified. 2. Irrespective of the merits of the contentions, since Ext.P7 made by the petitioner is pending before the second respondent, I direct the second respondent to take Ext.P7 representation duly adverting to Exts.P1 to P6. This, the second respondent shall do, with notice to the petitioner and the fifth respondent and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. 3. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed W.P.(C) No.3340/2011 : 2 : anything about the merits of the contentions and it is entirely for the second respondent to deal with the matter in accordance with law. 4. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment and writ petition before the second respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge