sat 1 wp 1688-2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1688 OF 2011 Dr.Navinchandra Umarshi Dedhia ...Petitioner vs. Inspector of Police, Matunga Police Station, Mumbai & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Niranjan Mundargi for the Petitioner. Mr.P.A. Pol, PP for the State. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & U.D. SALVI, JJ. AUGUST 5, 2011 P.C. :- 1 We have heard Mr.Mundargi, the learned Counsel for the petitioner who is a doctor by profession. 2 The petitioner’s daughter died an unnatural death on 17th April, 2011 in her matrimonial home. On the basis of his complaint, an FIR came to be registered and on investigation, a charge-sheet was filed. On committal, the case has been registered as Sessions Case No.539/2011 for the offences punishable under Sections 306 and 498A read sat 2 wp 1688-2011 with 34 of IPC. 3 It is now the contention of the petitioner that his daughter died a homicidal death and she did not commit suicide. He also claims to have addressed letters to the Commissioner of Police and various other authorities on 20th April, 2011 and based on the said letters, he prays for directions for further investigation. 4 It is well settled that in case, a charge is required to be altered based on the evidence before the trial court, the trial court has the said powers to alter the charge from 306 to 302 of IPC. We have also gone through the post mortem report and the accompaniments to the charge-sheet. Prima facie, we do not find that any material document or statement of a witness has not been filed with the charge-sheet. Even otherwise, Mr.Pol, the learned PP, on instructions, stated across the Bar that the Investigating Officer, who is present before the Court, will record the petitioner’s supplementary statement and submit the same before the trial court so as to form part of the charge-sheet, along with all the sat 3 wp 1688-2011 relevant material, if any. 5 Hence, there is no case made out to entertain the present petition and the same is hereby rejected with liberty to the petitioner as is available in law. 6 If the petitioner visits the concerned police station within one week from today, the Investigation Officer shall record his supplementary statement and take further appropriate steps, as provided under the Cr.P.C. (U.D. SALVI, J) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J)