IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.149 of 2009 1. Bihar State Electricity Board through its Chairman, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 2. The Financial Controller, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna Respondents- Petitioners Versus 1. Ramesh Singh S/o late Kauleshwar Singh resident of village Rasalpur PS Muffasil Dist. Gaya Petitioner/ Opposite Party Ist set 2. The General Manger cum Chief Engineer, Central Electric Supply Area , Patna Magadh Area Gaya, Manpur Dist. Gaya 3. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Urban Electric Supply Division, Gaya 4. The Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 5. The Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna Respondents/ Opposite Party 2nd set -------------- 05/ 28.07.2010 This review application has been filed by the authorities of the Bihar State Electricity Board raising many issues why the same should be allowed. Their contention is that many aspects of the dispute were not taken into consideration by the court before passing the order dated 22.07.2008 in CWJC No. 8586 of 2005. It is apparent from reading of the order passed in the writ application that despite several adjournments and opportunities granted to the Electricity Board, no counter affidavit was filed and no assistance worth the name was rendered. That was the back ground under which order came to be passed. The court fails to understand as to how an error of law apparent on the face of record has been committed while passing the earlier order in the writ application. In fact, the court is of the opinion that allowing the review application would be giving a premium to the default committed on the part of the - 2 - respondents in rendering the assistance when the first writ application was disposed of. Such default cannot form the basis for review application. The application is dismissed. shahid (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)