Crl. Misc. No.M-22011 of 2008 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-22011 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision : 02.09.2011 Agya Ram and others ... Petitioners versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present: Mr. G.C.Shahpuri, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sandeep S.Mann, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** Mahesh Grover, J. (Oral) In this petition, prayer has been made for quashing of the FIR bearing No.182 dated 14.07.2008 under the provisions of Sections 498-A, 406, 323 & 506 IPC registered at police Station Farakpur, Yamunanagar. During the subsistence of the proceedings, the matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court wherein both the parties have now settled the dispute in the following terms: 1. That Dr. Rosy, will cooperate in quashing the FIR No.182 dated 14.07.2008 against all the six petitioners under Section 498-A, 406, 323 & 506 IPC registered at Police Station Farakpur, Yamuna Nagar. 2. That Dr. Rosy, will come present in the Hon'ble High Court on the date to be fixed by the Hon'ble Bench and will not object to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. In other words, she will have no objection in quashing the FIR by the Hon'ble Judge. 3. That Smt. Malkiat Devi will make a registered gift deed of Crl. Misc. No.M-22011 of 2008 (O&M) -2- Ramesh Nursing Home, Clinic-cum-residence in favour of Dr. Ramesh Kumar, without any reservation within a week. 4. That Dr. Ramesh and his wife Dr. Rosy, have compensated Sh. Agya Ram and Smt. Malkiat Devi parents of Dr. Ramesh Kumar. 5. That the parties assure that they will cooperate with each other in family matters in future in all respect and will lead a peaceful life. 6. That Dr. Ramesh Kumar and Dr. Rosy will not claim any share in the parental movable or immovable property owned and possessed by them. 7. That Dr. Ramesh will have his share in his ancestral property wherever it is situated. That the compromise is binding on all concerned and it is hoped that no body will dare to resile from the aforesaid compromise.” The complainant is present in court and has stated in unequivocal terms that the dispute has since been settled between the parties and the aforesaid terms have been accepted by both of them. In view of the aforesaid, when the parties have amicably resolved their dispute and also keeping in view the observations made by the Full Bench in Kulwinder Singh versus State of Punjab 2007 (3) Law Herald 2225 present petition is allowed and FIR No.182 dated 14.07.2008 registered under Sections 498-A, 406, 323 & 506 IPC at Police Station Farakpur, Yamunanagar and all consequent proceedings arising therefrom are directed to be quashed. September 02, 2011 (Mahesh Grover) sonia Judge