fi3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPURfCHHATTISGARH} ^' WRIT PETITION N0.2GJ'^-y2005 PETITIONER ^7..--"'. ^: ^: ^ l.>" ^•••'' ..••' <Q^5^ ..••""' ^••/'i?' ..••'"' "'.,'^\<s-"" ^\y~ l.t'1 Bhupendra KumarJain, aged 54Yrs. S/o. Shri Khajanchi Lal Jain, R/o. Near Socity Ara Millers, Badhai Para, Road, Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS l') State of Chhattisgarh, tlirough Secretai'y to the dept. of home Affairs, D.K.S. Bhawan Secretari:il, Raipur(C.G.) ^2) Superintendent of police, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Vj Station House office, P.S. City / Kotwali, Raipur (C.G.) ^' Inspector General of Police, Raipur, C.G. 5/)' Jagdish Prasad Gupta S/o. Babi.ilal Gupta, aged 67 years. 6) Pradeep Kumar Gupta S/o. Jagdish Prasad Gupta, aged 45 Years. ,7') Sanjay Kumar Gupta S/o. Jagdish Prasad Gupta, aged 42 Years, respondent no. 5 to 7 are R/o. House No. 11/566, Sadar Bazar, Raipur, P.S. City Kotwali, Raipur WRIT PETITION__UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR GRANT OF WRIT IN NATUR.E OF MANDAMUS OR CERCIORARI OR. ANY OTHER WRITS QR DIRECTIONS OR ANY_QTHER REMADY OF THE LIKE NATAURE <'•. r-y R: XI-HC-22 SIT^TERT RFricf;3:n^T ?it]Wfff?(f •i5;!3^8"'sak.1 ^•".•.^;.^-T J, san/e ^s ^ ,.a" ' / y--;?< ~3^ -^WW^, 9-<S\WW, tfMIUy n ^ KTffC'fT Sfiirrai^.^.p^.o.,..3o.l.^ '.< 200 |C|<l«g, ai^i^diWHfscT Hsard Shri S.C. Verma, Dubey, Govt. Ad'.'ocate for the Sit This is the second round j: Eariier the petiiioner filed writ pe^l on 22-3-2003 atiet breaking She | away whoie staiionary material^ 'he shop. He immediateiy rush't any action. VVhile disposing of| pefjtsoner So make a represenia< No:2 was dlrecied to enauirt accordance with I'aw. Learned counsei for tht petitioner made a representaiiorl ihe offence under Sections 454,1 3-1-2005 a.nd since ihen the pc^ and !ne maner 's jying as rt is, the InyestSgafion and fils rsporS 4 As ths csse has ali invesligaiinfl into the matter, 11 Qoncerned Judicial IVJaciistfate uiii gtatlon fails and concarned Magi^ W'ih the above obsen'atid Partles are entitled for saflv eilt qiiqfaifFT WRfr'ff fe'Zt'(RRSR ^sri^Hsn^i :ounsei for the petitioner and Sh" Sandeep ;i|ats/rsspondsrts No.1 to 4. bf iiiiflsiion bv ihs Dstiijonsr before thi's Court. jition No.3574/2003 raisind Ihe arievance that |i'ook of his shop, respondenSs No.S to 7 took valuing about Rs.1 lakh which was iying in i^d to ihe poiice but the pdiice had not taken |the said wrii petifion ihis Couri aiiowed Sne (ion before respondenl No.2 and respondent '^ into and decide ihe representatton in pefjtloner submltted ihat thereafter ihe upon which the for the commission of 1380 and 426 of ihe I.P.C. was reaistere" on !lcs js not procesdlng with the investigatlon speretore, ine poiice cs airecteci to compiete ^fors the concsrned Msgl^trsts. \u-.1' fy bssn registsred and'»'ths Polios is noi Ihe peii'tioner is entilled to approaoh ihs uijider whose jurisdicfion tho oonoerned polioe i^trate is entitled to ca!) for the report. |n, the petition siands uisposed QT. iified copy of thls order. ' Sdl- 1_.C. Bhadoo .3udge ('fl^^ir