1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.3 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1507 OF 2009 Pandurang H. Patil. ...Petitioner. Vs. Swadhin Kshatriya, the Commissioner& Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni i/b.S.A.Sawant for the Petitioner. Ms.T.H.Puranik for Respondent Nos.1 to 4. Mr.Jamshed Ansari i/b.S.Mahomedbhai & Co. for Respondent No. 5. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. February 2, 2010. P.C. : Counsel appearing on behalf of the Fifth Respondent has stated before the Court that the offending structure has been removed and the Fifth Respondent shall not reconstruct the structure which has been removed. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner states that the structure has, as a matter of fact, been removed. In view of the aforesaid situation and in view of the statement made on behalf of the Fifth Respondent, it is not expedient in the interests of justice to exercise the contempt jurisdiction any further. The Contempt Petition 2 is disposed of.