IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2831 of 2009. Decided on: 31st December, 2010. Jagtar Singh & others. … Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Trilok Jamwal, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “(a) That the writ in the nature of Mandamus may kindly be issued directing the respondents to grant work charge status/regularization to the petitioners from the date when they completed 10 years of their service. (b) That the respondents be directed to pay the arrears to the petitioners after completion of their 10 years of service as per the policy framed by the State Government of work charge status/regularization with all consequential benefits as well as seniority.” 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in CWP No. 2735 of 2010 titled as Rakesh Kumar and others vs. State of H.P. and others decided on 28th July, 2010. Therefore, it is for the 2 petitioners to approach the first respondent within a period of one month, in which case the matter will be duly considered by the first respondent in the light of the judgment, referred to above and appropriate action in accordance with law will be taken within another four months from the date of receipt of the representation (s) along with a copy of this judgment and the copy of the judgment, referred to above. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 31st December, 2010 (Justice V.K. Sharma), (tr/kck) Judge. 3