1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.425 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.599 OF 2011 Tulsibai B. Singh ...Appellant. v. B.M.C. ...Respondents. WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER STAMP NO.9595 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP NO.9601 OF 2011 Shankar B. Singh ..Appellant. v/s. B.M.C. ..Respondent. Mr. Diwakar Dwivedi , adv. For the Appellants. Ms K.K.Soran, adv. For the Respondent/BMC. Shri Vineet B. Naik i/by Kanga & Co., adv. For the Intervener present in Court. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : JUNE 9, 2011. P.C. 1 These appeals are preferred by the appellants against the refusal of ad-interim relief pending the notice of motion wherein they only sought direction that the Municipal Corporation shall not demolish the structure without following due process of law. Notice of motion is 2 still pending. In view of the facts and circumstances, appeals and the applications may be disposed off with the following directions: 2 Respondent shall file reply and/or written statement within four weeks before the trial Court and the trial Court shall hear and dispose off the notice of motion on its own merits within six weeks thereafter. Till then the Municipal Corporation shall not demolish suit structure without following due process of law. 3 Appeals and the applications stand disposed off accordingly. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)