AB 1866/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AC UPADHYAY This is an application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail of t he accused-petitioners, namely, (1) Sri Umesh Ch. Roy and (2) Sri Tapan Ch. Roy @ Tapan Roy, in connection with Golokganj P.S. Case No. 136/2011, under Sections 341/326/506/34 IPC. Heard Mr. A. Purkayastha, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. K. Munir, learned Addl. P.P. for the State of Assam. It appears from the FIR that the accused-petitioners are named in the FI R. The FIR also reveals that the accused-petitioners, armed with ’dao’, etc., sudde nly intercepted the father of the first informant and pulled him down from the b icycle and out of previous grudge, they assaulted the father of the first inform ant and injured him on his head and other parts of his body. Subsequently, the i njured was admitted in the Golakganj Govt. Hospital for treatment. On perusal of the case diary and the injury report of the victim and further con sidering progress of investigation of the case, I am of the considered view that this is not a fit case to extend the benefit of pre-arrest bail to the accused- petitioners in connection with the aforementioned case. Accordingly, the prayer for pre-arrest bail, filed on behalf of the petitioners, stands rejected.