IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2254 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income-tax-11 ...Appellant Vs. M/s.Reminiscent Television Ltd....Respondent Mr. A.D. Kango, for the Appellant. Mr. A.R. Singh, for Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO : F.I. REBELLO : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. R.S. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. MOHITE, JJ. MOHITE, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 17TH DECEMBER 2007 : 17TH DECEMBER 2007 : 17TH DECEMBER 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The question of law as framed is covered by the judgment of this Court in Income Tax Appeal Lodging No.194 Income Tax Appeal Lodging No.194 Income Tax Appeal Lodging No.194 of 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Shri Firoz Khan of 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Shri Firoz Khan of 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Shri Firoz Khan and other Appeals decided on 20th June, 2006, which has followed the judgment in Abdulgafar Nadiadwala A. Abdulgafar Nadiadwala A. Abdulgafar Nadiadwala A. Nadiadwala vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax and Nadiadwala vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax and Nadiadwala vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax and Ors., 267 ITR 488 (Bom.). Ors., 267 ITR 488 (Bom.). Ors., 267 ITR 488 (Bom.). The question of law as framed, therefore, would not arise. Consequently Appeal dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, (R.S.MOHITE, (R.S.MOHITE, J.) J.) J.) (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J)