IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 802 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 17/07/2008 in WP NO : 15342 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Akula Naga Surya Vijaya Kumar, S/o. Veerraju, R/o. Door No.32-7-13, Meraka Veedhi, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The District Collector, East Godavari District, Kakinada. 2 The Special Collector(Land Acquistion), Pushkara Lift Irrigation, Indira Sagar Project, J.N.Road, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 3 The Chief Engineer, Pushkara Lift Irrigation, Dowleswaram, East Godavari District. 4 The Superintending Engineer, Pushkara Lift Irrigation, Dowleswaram,East Godavari District. 5 M/s Prasad Constructions Ltd., rep by its Managing Director, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.VL.N.G.KMURTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) Heard the learned Advocates. We are in agreement with the view expressed by the learned Single Judge that disputed questions of fact were involved in the petition. Moreover, when technical issues are involved in this appeal with regard to the construction of canal and more particularly when the land in question has already been acquired and excavation work with regard to the construction of canal is over, in our opinion, the learned Single Judge has rightly rejected the petition. We do not see any substance in this appeal and, therefore, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. _____________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ __________________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 24th September, 2008. GRR