IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1448 of 2007 1. Md. Rafique, son of Late Md. Habib. 2. Md. Jamil, son of Md. Rafique. 3. Md. Jahangir, son of Md. Rafique. 4. Md. Shamim, son of Md. Rafique. 5. Md. Quais, son of Md. Rafique. 6. Md. Nasruddin, son of late Md. Kitab. 7. Md. Idu Hussain, son of Late Md. Ramzan. 8. Sharifan Khatoon, wife of Md. Idu Hussain. (sl.nos. 1 to 8 are residents of village- Deoria, Purani Bazar, Mehdi Ganj, P.S.- Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur) 9. Md. Abid Hussain, son of Md. Shafil. 10. Aaiyasha Khatoon, wife of Md. Abid Hussain. (sl.nos. 9 and 10 are residents of village-Madhuban, P.S.- Madhuban, District- Motihari, East Champaran) ……….Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Md. Ismail, son of Ghafoor Mian. 3. Md. Nabi Hassan, son of Abdul Ghafoor. (both are residents of village- Deoria, Purani Bazar, Mehdiganj, P.S.- Deoria, District- Muazaffarpur) ……….Opposite Parties ---------------------------------- 6. 12.12.2011 The accused petitioners have preferred this revision application against the order dated 17.09.2007 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.II, Muzaffarpur in Sessions Trial No.681/2004 by which the petition under Section 227 of the Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioners have been rejected and they have been directed to physically appear before the court for framing of charges on 27.09.2007. Heard the learned counsel for the 2 petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. It is submitted that charges have been framed against the petitioners. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and on perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned trial court has considered the material on the record and thereafter passed the impugned order. I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)