IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 569 OF 2009 MASSILLON DIAS ... Petitioner Versus THE CHIEF OFFICER MARGAO MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. S. Mahambrey, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.S.D. Padiyar, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr.S.R. Vernekar, Advocate for respondent no.2. Coram:- SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 16th December, 2009 P.C. Heard. We have perused the photographs submitted by the parties at pages 9 and 10. Counsel on behalf of respondent no.1 has produced another photograph, the same is placed on record. From the said photograph the wooden cupboard/counter can be clearly seen. Shri Padiyar, Learned Counsel on behalf of respondent no.1, makes a statement that in case respondent no.2 keeps the said cupboard/counter on the public street, outside the shop as seen on the photograph, the officers of respondent no.1 will seize the same and take it away under the provisions of Municipalities Act. We accept the said statement and in the light of that, nothing survives in this petition and accordingly the same is disposed off. SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. oc