1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 7th day of June, 2011 First Bail Application No. 398 of 2011 Criminal Side Ramji Gupta S/o Shivji Gupta R/o Village Ramnagar P.S.Rudrapur District Udham Singh Nagar …….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…..Opposite Party Arising out of F.I.R. No. 193 of 2011 Under Sections: 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 379, 411 I.P.C. Police Station: Rudrapur District: Udham Singh Nagar Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. S.K.Mandal, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. B.S.Parihar, Brief Holder, present for the State. Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, Advocate, present for the complainant. 2 Heard. Applicant– Ramji Gupta, who is in jail in connection with F.I.R. No. 193 of 2011, relating to offences punishable under section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 379, 411 I.P.C., police station Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar, has sought his release on bail. A cheque is said to have been stolen and deposited in the account of one Vivek Gupta. In the First Information Report said Vivek Gupta and Rakesh Mishra are named as the persons involved in the crime. The applicant Ramji Gupta is not named in the First Information Report. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that there is no evidence on record suggesting the involvement of the applicant in commission of crime. It is alleged that he has been implicated only because he is the father of the Vivek Gupta. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail. The Bail Application is allowed. Let the applicant- Ramji Gupta be released on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like 3 amount, to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt.7.06.2011 Nahid