IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. FAO 380 of 2007 DATE OF DECISION : JULY 14, 2008 NATIONAL INSUANCE COMPANY LIMITED ....... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS KAMLESH KAUR ETC. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. RC Kapoor, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Parveen Kumar, Advocate, for respondents No.7 & 8. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant-Insurance Company, while assailing the findings recorded by the Commissioner Workmen's Compensation, Gurdaspur, has argued that, in fact, the accident had taken place earlier in point of time whereas the vehicle was insured later in point of time. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the impugned order. FAO 380 of 2007 2 A reference to the impugned order shows that the time in the insurance policy is recorded as 10.04 a.m. As per the police case in regard to the accident, the accident had taken place at 11.00 a.m. on the same day i.e. 30.7.2003. These facts have not been disputed by the learned counsel for the appellant. This being the position, the appeal can be disposed of without reference to record. The contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that there was a computer glitch and, therefore, the time given in the Cover Note should be taken into consideration. However, the case set up by respondents No.7 and 8 is that no Cover Note was issued. Having regard to the findings recorded by the Commissioner that the date and time recorded in the insurance policy indicate that the truck was insured before the accident, I do not find any reason to interfere. No ground has been brought out for interference in the findings of fact recorded by the Commissioner. No substantial question of law arises for determination. The appeal is dismissed. July 14, 2008 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE