IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.138 of 2011 TIMAL YADAV @ TIMAN YADAV, son of Late Uttim Yadav Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 02.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case no.30 of 2010 registered under Section 363(A)/364 of the I.P.C. Originally, informant filed complaint case which was converted into the above stated police case. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that as per prosecution case itself, the alleged occurrence took place on 12.4.2008, but the complaint case was filed on 15.12.2009 and no explanation of the aforesaid delay has been given. Although, the victim boy has not been recovered as yet, but considering the aforesaid facts as well as period of detention of the petitioner in jail custody namely, Timal Yadav @ Timan Yadav is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case no.30 of 2010. PN ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)