1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.399 OF 2011. IN WRIT PETITION NO.2266 OF 2002 (D). (Sushant Shikshan Sanskar Sanstha and another Vs. Lala Arjun Meshram and two others) WITH LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.410 OF 2011. IN WRIT PETITION NO.2767 OF 2002 (D). (Sushant Shikshan Sanskar Sanstha and another Vs. Bhojraj Teknath Doye and two others) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Shri M.M. Sudame, Advocate for Applicants. Shri G.D. Asole, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Ms. Tajwar Khan, AGP for Respondent No.3. CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2011. Heard. Contention is that the absence of findings by the School Tribunal recorded by learned Single Judge is unwarranted. With the assistance of the learned respective Counsel we have perused papers. We find that the learned Single Judge is right in concluding that the School Tribunal did not record the findings on vital issues, as noted by the 2 learned Single Judge in paragraph 2 of his judgment. Letters Patent Appeal is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE NSN