In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh C.W.P. No. 15125 of 2006 Date of Decision: September 21, 2006 Satyawart …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI PRESENT: Mr. Umesh Narang, Advocate, for the petitioner. JUDGMENT M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral) The prayer made by the petitioner is for compassionate appointment in view of the death of his father in August, 1992. The petitioner has attained majority on completion of 18 years in 1999. After attaining majority he applied but his case was rejected on 19.12.2001 (P-3). The order dated 19.12.2001 (P-3) is the subject matter of challenge in the instant petition. Having perused the averment of the petitioner and hearing arguments of the learned counsel, we are of the considered view that the petitioner does not deserve to be given any compassionate appointment. At this stage, learned counsel for the CWP No. 15125 of 2006 petitioner requests for withdrawal of the petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (M.M.S. BEDI) September 21, 2006 JUDGE Pkapoor 2