1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.07.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.5718 of 2011 Antony Jeyaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The General Manager, Southern Railways, Chennai. 2.The Senior Deputy General Manager (Vigilance), General Manager's Office, Southern Railway, Chennai. 3.A.P.Muthuramalingam, Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Southern Railways, Trichy. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's complaint dated 18.04.2011 against the third respondent. For Petitioner ... Mr.S.Ramesh ORDER The petitioner has come up with this writ petition to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner's complaint dated 18.04.2011 against the third respondent. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record. 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that a complaint has also been given previously. The same has not been enclosed in the typed set of papers. 4. The nature of the complaint relates to contract of the year 2007. The first of the representations, is made only on 18.04.2011. There is an inordinate delay on the part of the petitioner in making the complaint and it gives an element of doubt as to the bona fides of the petitioner's claim. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5. In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to grant any relief to the petitioner and hence, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. rsb Sd/- Assistant Registrar[AE] /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1. The General Manager, Southern Railways, Chennai. 2. The Senior Deputy General Manager (Vigilance), General Manager's Office, Southern Railway, Chennai. 3. The Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Southern Railways, Trichy. W.P.(MD)No.5718 of 2011 Dated:04.07.2011 2P/4C RPB 13.07.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/