IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8163 of 2008 BETWEEN M/s. Suryodaya Homes Pvt. Ltd, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad ... PETITIONER AND The Executive Officer/Panchayat Secretary, Pragathinagar Gram Panchayat, Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. A.M. RAO Counsel for the Respondent: MR. P. RAGHAVENDRA REDDY SC FOR ZPP The Court made the following order: ORDER: This writ petition is filed questioning the notice dated 21.01.2008 issued in notice No.GP/197/1/2007-08 canceling the building permission granted to the permission in Plot Nos.403 and 404 in Sy.Nos.170(P), 171(P), 172(P), 173, 174 and 175(P) situated within the limits of Gram Panchayat Pragathinagar on the ground that the plots in question were coming under the full tank level of Ambeer Cheruvu and Buffer Zone. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the subject matter of the writ petition is covered by the judgment of this Court in WP.No.6863 of 2008 and batch dated 11.06.2009. 3. I have perused a copy of the aforesaid order passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in the above writ petitions wherein in the identical circumstances the impugned notices were directed to be treated as show cause notices allowing the petitioners therein to file explanations and with a further direction to the respondents to consider the explanations and pass appropriate orders. 4. Having regard to the similar nature of relief sought for in this writ petition and following the aforesaid order dated 11.06.2009 in WP.No.6863 of 2008 and batch, the notice dated 21.01.2008 issued by the respondent shall be treated as show cause notice and the petitioner is permitted to file explanation to the said notice within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such explanation being filed, the respondent is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders. Till such exercise is undertaken, status quo obtaining as on today shall be maintained with respect to the construction made by the petitioner. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J September 7, 2011 DSK