1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8603 OF 2009 Murlidhar Dattoba Nimankar ..Petitioner Vs Vishwanath Gyandeo Deokate ..Respondent ---- Mr.Neel G. Helekar for the petitioner. ---- Coram : R.S.MOHITE,J Date : 17th November, 2009. PC 1 This is a petition filed by one Murlidhar Dattoba Nimankar, who at the relevant time was the manager of a company by name M/s.Dattoba Warping Works. The workman has filed an application under Section 50 of the MRTU & PULP Act for recovery of some amount due to him. The labour court allowed the matter partly and the revisional court has remanded the matter back for calculation of the amount due. It is seen from the title that the main application under Section 50 was filed against the company. The present petitioner was shown as a manager for the purpose of service. From both the orders i.e.the labour court as well as the revisional court, I find no directions that the amount should be recovered from the property of the present petitioner. Obviously the recovery should be from the employer company. In the circumstances, there is no substance in the petition and the same is dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE,J) 2 3