IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39202 of 2011 Sanjay Kumar Yadav, S/O-Deonath Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar Through CBI ---------------------------------- 03 19.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for C.B.I. It would appear from perusal of the first information report as well as submissions of the parties that one cheque was stolen from the office of Life Insurance Corporation and subsequently, the aforesaid cheque after filling the amount of Rs. 7,92,000 was deposited in an account which had been opened in the name of one Ganesh Prasad. Later on, petitioner and other accused withdrew the aforesaid amount by different cheques. So far as petitioner is concerned, it is stated that he withdrew rupees one lac twenty five thousand from the aforesaid account. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that having similar allegation, co-accused Chandan Kumar Singh has already been granted privilege of bail by another Bench of this Court vide order dated 21.11.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 37671 of 2011 and petitioner is also ready to deposit the amount in question. It is further submitted by him that, as a matter of fact, one Alok Ranjan was operating computer institute and so far as petitioner is concerned, he was student of aforesaid Alok Ranjan and the above stated Alok Ranjan gave the cheque in question to petitioner to withdraw his amount. It is further submitted by him that the aforesaid Alok Ranjan became approver and falsely implicated the 2 petitioner and other co-accused persons. Although, learned counsel for the petitioner tried to convince me about the innocence of the petitioner but I am not, at all, convinced with his submission. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with R/C. No. 3 (S) 2010 pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, C.B.I., Muzaffarpur is, hereby, rejected. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)