THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1667 of 2010 O R D E R: This Civil Revision Petition has been moved by defendants 1 and 2 in civil suit, O.S.No. 186 of 2005 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge at Nirmal. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the procedure adopted by the Court of the Junior Civil Judge at Nirmal in not properly dealing with the suit O.S.No. 186 of 2005. When the learned counsel for the petitioners bitterly complained about the inaction of the Court below in dealing with I.A.No. 464 of 2005 moved in O.S.No. 186 of 2005, I was perplexed as to why the Court below was not taking up the matter from 27.04.2006 onwards and hence, passed an order on 18.06.2010, directing the Registrar (Judicial) to call for a report from the Principal Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Nirmal to explain the reasons why I.A.No. 464 of 2005 moved in O.S.No. 186 of 2005 on the file of the said Court has not been disposed of so far and as to what really is the matter about. Accordingly, the Registrar (Judicial) has called for a report and the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Nirmal who is in full additional charge of the Principal Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Nirmal has filed a detailed report on 23.06.2010. To her report, the learned Judicial Officer has taken care to enclose photo copies of the docket sheet of the suit, a perusal of which discloses that the statement made at the Bar when the Civil Revision Petition was taken up that the I.A. has not been called after 27.04.2006 and it has not been dealt with properly by the Court below, is factually incorrect. The I.A. has been called on 23.06.2006, 18.07.2006, 28.08.2006, 04.09.2006 and so on and so forth. It is undergoing adjournment after adjournment at the request of one counsel or the other or by both. Now, the officer has also indicated that I.A.No. 464 of 2005 is posted to 15.07.2010 along with the suit. When the learned counsel for the petitioners has been confronted with the factual aspects, he solicits permission to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition. The Civil Revision Petition is therefore, dismissed as withdrawn, but however, subject to the condition that the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred only) before the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nirmal, so that the said money can be utilized for legal aid purposes by that Court. ---------------------------------- (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) 2nd July 2010 ksld