FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 717 OF 200 APPEAL NO. 717 OF 200 APPEAL NO. 717 OF 2000 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri D.R.More forthe appellant Shri A.B.Vagyani for Respdt.3. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE,J. MHATRE,J. MHATRE,J. DTAED: DTAED: DTAED: 21ST AUGUST, 2006 21ST AUGUST, 2006 21ST AUGUST, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This appeal arises out of the alleged offence committed in the year 1998 under sections 395 and 397 of Cr.P.C. which could not come up for admission for all these days, as the accused persons were not treacable and there was very difficulty in serving them. 2. Notice on application for delay was served. Ultimately the delay was condoned, and the appeal is now listed for admission. We have perused the impugned order. The learned trial Judge while acquitting the accused has considered the entire evidence on record, properly appreciated it and came to the conclusion that the accused persons were not proved to be guilty and therefore proceeded to acquit them. There is no legal or jurisdictional error committed by the learned Judge. In such circumstances, we see no reason to interfere. Appeal thus dismissed. ...