THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.858 of 2003 ORAL ORDER: When the matter came up for consideration on 18.8.2010, this Court passed the following order: “Learned Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to take out personal notice to respondent No.2 by registered post with acknowledgement due ad file proof of service. In default, the W.P. stands dismissed as against respondent No.2 without further reference to the Court. Post after four (4) weeks.” It appears, since the said order was not complied with, the registry made an endorsement that as per Court Order dated 18.8.2010, the case against respondent No.2 stands dismissed. In view of the same, nothing survives against respondent No.1 and thus, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 3.2.2011 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.858 of 2003 3.2.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.858 of 2003 Date: 3rd February, 2011 Between: M/s Big Shot Annex, rep. by its Partner, Abids, Hyderabad. .. Petitioner And The Authority under Section 20 of the Minimum Wages Act and the Labour Officer-III, Anjaiah Karmika Bhavan, RTC X Roads Hyderabad. .. Respondent