IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 2ND FEBRUARY 2010 / 13TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 3403 of 2010(A) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHEEJA.B.S, AGED 33 YEARS, D/O.SURENDRAN, R/AT HARSHA NILAYAM- MP/II-545, KORANI P.O., CHEMBUMANAGALAM, VEYILOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 104. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.HARISH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. MANGALAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, GRAMA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, MANGALAPURAM. 3. THE SECRETARY, MANGALAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, GRAMA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, MANGALAPURAM. 4. M/S.DISHNET WIRELESS LTD.NO.9419/33/2365 R.R.ARCADE, GEETHANJALI BUS STOP, NH BYE PASS, THAMMANAM P.O., VYTTILA, KOCHI-32. 5. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANGALAPURAM POLICE STATION, MANGALAPURAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. MS.K.R.DEEPA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.3403 of 2010 (A) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 2nd day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner's grievance is against Ext.P2, a building permit granted by the 3rd respondent to the 4th respondent, which is for the purpose of installing a telecommunication tower. 2. According to the petitioner, the grant of permit is in violation of the guidelines governed by the Building Rules. It is stated that the people of the locality have raised their objection by filing Ext.P6, and the petitioner has filed Ext.P8 representation before the 3rd respondent, and that even the representations have not been considered. Having regard to the above, I direct the 3rd respondent to consider Exts.P6 & P8, if these representations have been received and are pending. Orders thereon shall be passed with notice to the petitioner and the 4th respondent as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg