IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14267 of 2007 KARUNA SINHA wife of Ajay Kuma Sinha Resident of village Beladih P.O. Taqrari P.S. Daudnagar District Aurangabad (Bihar) Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR through chief Secretary, Bihar Patna. 2.Secretary Welfare Department, Government of Bihar 3.Director, Welfare Department Government of Bihar. 4.District Magistrate, Aurangabad. 5.S.D.O. Daudnagar, Aurangabad 6.C.D.P.O. Daudnagar, Aurangabad. 7.Archana Sinha, wife of Sri Rakesh kumar Singh resident of village Belaqrhi P.O. Tarari, P.S. Daud Nagar, District Aurangabad (Bihar). ----------- 2 4/12/2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. Prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows:- “That this writ application is preferred on behalf of the above named petitioner for issuance of appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions commanding the respondent no.4 who is District magistrate Aurangabad to upheld the selection of the petitioner on the post of Angan bari Sevika, whose selection on the said post has been done by performing all due procedure.” Counsel for the petitioner, had also referred to paragraph no. 11 to 15 of this writ petition which reads as follows:- “That thereafter respondent No. 7 Archana Sinha who was in the second of the Merit list, but she was not selected for Anganbari Sevika for Beladhi Dhobi Tola Centre, filed a petition stating therein 2 that the Beladhi Dhobi Tola Anganbari Centre has not been constituted as per Government Provision. Accordingly a report was called by way District Magistrate, Aurangabad from S.D.O., Daudnagar, who submitted report that Centre of Anganbari Sevika for village Beladhi Dhobi Tola has not been constituted as per provision. Accordingly District Magistrate, Aurangabad cancelled the selection of the petitioner for Anganbari Sevika for village Beladhi Dhobi Tola. That when the petitioner came to know this fact, she filed requisition under informant act to know that full facts but she was supplied with incomplete information without date and sign of the authority who cancelled the selection of Anganbari Sevika for Beladhi Dhobi Tola Centre, Daudnagar. That thereafter petitioner filed a representation on 18.9.2007 before District Magistrate Aurangabad stating therein that S.D.O., Daudnagar has submitted baseless report coming in collusion of respondent no. 7 Archana Sinha, that house of petitioner is situated in Bengla Bigha which is part of village Gawasgadh. That it is relevant to mention here that total population of village Beladhi Dhobi Tola 1010, whereas total population of Gowasgar, is 1031. Yet S.D.O., Daudnagar has reported that Tola Bangla Bigha (Kamata Bigha) at which the petitioner resides, should be included in village Gowasgar which is quite illegal, unjustified because the population of Beladhi Dhobi Tola is less than population of Gawasgar. That Collector, Aurangabad did not pay heed to the representation filed by the petitioner.” and had submitted that no order has been passed by the Collector of the district with regard to the aforementioned grievance pertaining to selection/appointment of the petitioner vis-a-vis Respondent no. 7 Anganbari Sevika. Counsel for the State in absence of in structure 3 is not in a position to assist this Court. In that view of the matter, this Court would direct the Collector of the district to dispose of the pending representation of the petitioner within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by a speaking order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, respondent no.7 as also the representative of the concerned Gram Panchayat. With the aforementioned observation/direction this application is disposed of. Abhay Kumar (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)