IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 8373 of 2009 Between: Kondabathini Harinath, S/o late Venkataiah, 41 years, Photographer, R/o Vangara village, Bheemdevarapalli Mandal, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Director General of Police, Karimnagar and 4 others. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.8373 of 2009 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not conducting proper investigation into the case in Crime NO.5 of 2007 on the file of the 3rd respondent, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently sought for a direction to the 3rd respondent to reinvestigate into the case and file charge sheet. On a complaint filed by the petitioner against respondents 4 and 5 alleging that they have fabricated some documents in order to set up a false claim, the 3rd respondent registered a case in Crime No.5 of 2007 against respondents 4 and 5 for the offences under Sections 420, 468, 471 I.P.C. After investigating into the said crime, the police opined that it is purely civil in nature and accordingly a final report was also filed before the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Husnabad. Questioning the said final report, the petitioner approached this Court and filed the present writ petition. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the documents furnished by the revenue officials and the other material connected thereto clearly established the guilt of the respondents 4 and 5, but however, the police with a malafide intention filed the said final report stating that it is purely civil in nature. I am unable to appreciate the aforesaid contention put forth by the learned Counsel for the petitioner. If the petitioner has any grievance about the filing of the final report, it is always left open to him to approach the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Husnabad and file a protest petition as provided for under the Code of Criminal Procedure, instead the petitioner approached this Court and filed the present writ petition. I do not find any merit in this writ petition. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ____________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 14-09-2009 Gsn.