IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.822 of 2007 CHHATTU SHAW @ CHHATTU PRASAD @ CHHATTU SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 24.9.2008 KHAN In the instant writ petition the petitioner prays for a direction to the respondent- Bihar State Electricity Board for conducting an internal vigilance enquiry in the matter involved in Complaint Case No.2© of 2006 dated 28.11.2006 under sections 135 and 136 of the Electricity Act. The Board filed a complaint case making allegation of theft of electricity. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no electric pole in the back of his house. Mr.Vinay Kirti Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Board submits that regular complaint has already been instituted and it would be open to the petitioner to produce his defence in the trial court. Having learned counsel for the parties, I do not find sufficient ground for directing vigilance enquiry by the inner cell of the Board itself. In the result, this writ petition is dismissed. (S.P.Singh,J)