IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 10TH MARCH 2008 / 20TH PHALGUNA 1929 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 750 of 2008() ----------------------------- CMP.469/2008 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, TIRUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER: APPELLANT/ACCUSED ----------------------------------- MUJEEB, S/O.IBRAHIM PANAKKATTIL HOUSE, P.O.VENGAD, TIRUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON SMT.SHERLY THOMAS RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT ----------------------------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VALANCHERY POLICE STATION, VALANCHERY MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.S. SIVAKUMAR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J ...................................... Crl. R.P. No. 750 of 2008 ...................................... Dated: 10-03-2008 O R D E R Heard both sides. 2. In the light of the common order dated 25.02.2008 passed in Crl.M.C No. 543 of 2008 and connected cases, the impugned order is set aside and C.M.P. No. 469 of 2008 on the file of the J.F.C.M. Tirur shall stand restored to file and the goods autorickshaw in question shall be released to the petitioner on interim custody on the petitioner making a cash deposit for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) and executing a bond for Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees two lakhs only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount (without insisting on solvency certificate from such sureties) to the satisfaction of the Magistrate and on the petitioner giving an undertaking on the following terms:- 1. The petitioner shall not permit the user of the goods autorickshaw for any illicit purpose. Crl. R.P. No. 750 of 2008 -:2:- 2. The petitioner shall not transfer wholly or in part the goods autorickshaw to any other person. 3. The petitioner shall produce the goods autorickshaw before the Magistrate as and when directed to do so in the same condition in which it is released to him. 4. The interim custody of the goods autorickshaw shall be subject to final orders, if any, to be passed for confiscation. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. ani Crl. R.P. No. 750 of 2008 -:3:- V.RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE). ani