IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.18298 of 2011 Date of Decision:-28.09.2011 M/s Krishan Chand Bhagwat Parsad. ......Petitioner. Versus State Bank of India & Ors. ......Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present:- Mr. Robin Dutt, Advocate for the Petitioner. *** HEMANT GUPTA, J.(ORAL) The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court for quashing Sale Notice dated 20.09.2011 inter alia on the ground that the reserved price fixed is meager and that the petitioner is ready to pay the interest amount. A reading of the petition shows that the goods said to be the subject matter of Sale Notice stands hypothecated by the petitioner in favour of the bank. Since the petitioner has not paid the amount, therefore, the bank is taking action for sale of hypothecated goods. Such action of the bank is in terms of the contract entered upon by the petitioner with the bank. The Sale Notice(P-9) is inviting applications from the interested parties. Such notice has been published. Since it is a public notice and invitation is to the public at large to offer its bids, we do not find that the fixation of reserved price can give any right to the petitioner to dispute the process of sale. Dismissed. ( HEMANT GUPTA ) JUDGE ( JASWANT SINGH ) JUDGE September 28, 2011 Vinay