® t:^^ THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT B1LASPURCHHATTISGARH Misc.Appeal No.6c.7 /2003 APPEAL U/S f73 OF THE MO.TOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 (Appeal valued at Rs, 1,88,800.00) iilantfOwnerof the Vehicle): ^Caxman Singh S/o Chandan Singh. applicant No. 2 ' aged about 75 years R/o Village Karmoti, Tahsil Bhanupratapur Dtstt. Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS ltwar ai W/o Palturam aged about 29 years. •-•:ss^--- iondent No. 1 cant No. 1 -7 londent No._2 cant No. 2 &. : ^-Mansha Ram S/o Manglu Ram aged about 50 years londent No. 3 cant No. 3 ^R-afwantin Bai W/o Mansha Ram aged •-^ about 42 years. iondent_No,_ 4 cant No. 4 t?^ 'Kumari Agyaya Bai D/o Late Paltu Ram aged about 11 years. pndent_No_ 5 cant No. 5 ^ /./ Kumari Sangeeta D/o Late Paltu Ram aged about 11 years. ionden^Na_6 cant No. 6 5 -^ Hirendera D/o Late Paltu Ram aged about 11 years. Respondent No. 7 Applicant No. 7 ^ f- Kumari Hemlata D/o Lste Paltu Ram aged about 5 years. Respondent No. 8 Applicant No. 8 s :^-' Ku-.-Daleshv/ari Bai D/o Late Paltu Ram aged about 2 years. Respondent No.4 to 8 Minorthrcugh their natural guardian Mother Itwarin Bai All R/0 VillagePatelpara Chavela, P.S. Bhanupratappur, Distt. Kanker(C.G.) » &~t . .^.-^- ^^..-°\^ "^' , >^'' \^?' ^A0'' ^'" ,^~ ^.'*:1 :.~^K'' ^"'' ^ ' . ^ o ~c- -V l^ 6/ ^' ^°~ 0-, ^ . ^ ^ &v^c. o;r ^' '.^•y (-°.a'•^ <r~' ^ '.^ ^'^^" OY <^- ^ '.>^^- ^^ .•^'o Itwarin Bai and others (a) Smt. Budhantin Bai Potai W/o. .Late Laxinan Singh Potei Aged about 75 years (b) Kalyan Potai, S/ o. Late Laxman Singh Potai, aged about 53 years (c) Praba! Potai, S/o.Late Laxm.an Singh Potai, aged about 51 years (d) Sn-it. Chhama Potai, W/o. Late Prero. Sin.gh Potai Aged about 40 vears (e) Narendra Potai, S/o. Late Laxman Singh Potai Aged about 47 years (f) Satyendra Potai, S/o. Late Laxman Singh Potai Aged a.boiit 39 years AU_R/.o. Village Karmoti Tahsil BhaiiU.pt'atai.ppur Distl. Kanker (C.G-) A^ r ^" Sss@ondent Applicant No~ ReS£ondentJMo. 8 Appficant Nag' agea^DOur-n years. ~ - - ^ ^Kumarl. Hemlate DA? Late Paih, R= ased about' 5"yeai:su L<:tte h'altu Ram $ ^^lrr^010^^^ -ehanuprataPP^Disft.^a^^) y^iK'^!z3s\ XI-HC-78 *n*i^ri sh*iict» 3^ '^WM^, wiKu'ie,, Rfi-iiuy * * * +l* < ¥• *-»'*»^* *•'* »* * fl^-^e^ 311^1 Mflth (^c|i^6)^8T) 3n^T^)TR-fi+ awan^rgwq; fc ••••^'^^w :H&^^ ittjlg' ?OTWsf?(T3n^T PROCBEDINGlB OF LOK ADALAT Preslded by Hoa'ble Shri Justice SuaU Kuniar Sinha & Shri G.S. Aiaawal, Member 13.02.2007 df oruiinal Shri N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate, appears on behalf the appellant. Shri Prashant Jaiswal.l iJaiswal, Counsel for Compauy, J^dalpur. The proposed Leeal an appUcation for substitutiofa No. 1167/2004. It is stated that the died diirine fhe pcndencv of the proposed Legal claunants/respondents havc basis of which, the executioijt before the Tribitnal on Thereafter, an appUcation for| filed bv fhe proposed Leeal] marked as I.A. No.3261/2004.[ This apolication is not No. 10. accotunt •*i'4Fd<fl-i 4i^dTt|;tei^<Rf+Ai< ^iSrf^TSTI^T ofLokAdatat. Advocate with Shri Qamrul Aziz, proposed Legal Reprcsentatives of Sr. Advocate wifh Shri Sankalp No.IO - National Insuraace responldent Retlrcsealatives of appeUaat have ffled i, which has been marked as I.A. fbis appcUant - Laxman Siaeh had appcal. It is further steted that Repre^ntatives and the intered iato a coiupromise, on the proceedine has been disposed of of fuU. and final satisfaction. Iwifhdrawal of fhe appeal has been Reuresentatives, which has been boposed bv Counsel for respondent P.T.O. •••A^t'.d •^fS^ 'S'^'i^ ii.ft:. .x.11' XI-HC-78 3^ •<ll'Mld<l, OTflw'16, fs|dltiL{< +<1+1CIT Sh*1lcb r^/4 5' '2-<?oj, ^ 200- 3ll^i'l '<sich ('yi^sf^) 3n^rlmf?:(N; cRTSTT^TstiHjch .<i?"'n ,c'ri V !?&;" "'y €?¥ ^. •• 1 -'E^*' l;..';,wf.:;i'~ '<i;-L" .^-.. ^,'?\ ^. •:-^ ?TtirWHf?(T3TI^T -2_-| Suicc the Leeal Reorcsentatives of the aooellant fhemselves want to withdraw the appeal, thi wrf?pft^wraYir'te^l-rfSrRR ^STl^ITSTI^T ;re can hardly be aa. obiection fixim I.A. No. 1167/2004 and I.A. anv side. In view of fhe abov^, No.3261/2004 are allowed. Lct thc Leeal Representatihi'es be substituted on record. The appeal staads dismis^ed, as withdrawn. The certified copy of ti|ie order shall be supptied after substitution, which sIiaU be doiiic within 3 davs finm today. Sd/- Member - Lok Adalat High Court ofChhattisgarh Bilaspur Sd/- SuniS Kssmar Sicha Judge Judge-LokAdalat High Court ofChhattisgarh Bilaspur __i ^ --y /-7 '1>~' : -. '•s' ..--^..' / .^ ?' ;'> 3^ •.••"xs'^ y^f<F^ , ^~^x^ '.. r ^ i<r r i •^' ^ << P.T.O.