1 D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL NO. 845/2006 Smt. Narendra Kumari Vs. Board of Revenue and ors. Date of Order :: 3.12.2007 HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. RAJESH BALIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHANWAROO KHAN Mr. J.L. Purohit, for the appellant. Mr. H.S. Sidhu, for the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The appellant claims to be successor in the interest of land originally part of the land held by Late Shri Devi Singh, erstwhile Jagirdar of Aasop. The land alleged vested in the State Government as a result of Ceiling proceedings in the case of late Shri Vijendra Singh S/o Late Shri Devi Singh. The appellant claims the land which vested in the Ceiling proceedings in the State was not Khasara No.2393 which fell in the petitioner's share in the partition, but land of Khasara No.2693 only vested in the State. It is further stated that a revenue suit for declaration of appellant's title in the land in question is already pending at her instance. This litigation is only in respect of mutation entry 2 in the land record which though carry the presumption of correctness under Section 14 the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956, but such presumption is rebuttable and always subject to finding recorded in the properly instituted suit for declaration of title. In view of this position, we are of the opinion that the invocation of writ jurisdiction by the appellant was not appropriate remedy and entries made in the land records will be subject to out-come of the suit filed by her. Thus, without prejudice to the petitioner's contentions and out-come of the suit, the present appeal is dismissed. However, the mutation entries existing on the date shall be subject to the findings rendered in the suit filed by the appellant. No costs. [BHANWAROO KHAN],J. [RAJESH BALIA],ACTG.CJ. RM/