IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 19570 of 2008 Between: T.Roopa Singh, S/o. Kanahya Singh, R/o. H.No.20-2-656/1, Hussaini Alam, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund, Hyderabad 2 The Assistant Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Circle No.X, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly a writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents officials to act upon the representations given by the petitioners in respect of the illegal construction of shops being made unauthorizedly by self styled managing committee of Mahankali Temple Khairatabad and demolish the unauthorized construction of 3 shops on finding them to be illegal in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.PRATAP NARAYAN SANGHI Counsel for the Respondent No.: (SC FOR MCH CIRCLES 3&5)KALPANA EKBOTE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No : 19570 of 2008 O R D E R : This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents 1 and 2 (Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation) in not considering the representations made by the petitioner complaining about the alleged illegal construction of shops being made by the respondents 3 and 4 herein is arbitrary and illegal. I have heard the learned counsel for both the parties. The material on record shows that the petitioner submitted detailed representations/complaints through his counsel complaining about the alleged unauthorized illegal constructions being made by the respondents 3 and 4 at premises bearing No.6-1-535, Khairatabad, Hyderabad and the said representations/complaints were received in the office of the Corporation on 07.05.2008 and 19.05.2008. In the circumstances, the respondents 1 and 2 are bound to consider the said representations/complaints and make the necessary enquiry into the allegations made by the petitioner following due process of law. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to the correctness of the allegations made by the petitioner in the representations/complaints dated 07.05.2008 and 19.05.2008, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the above said representations/complaints and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law after giving an opportunity to the respondents 3 and 4 to rebut the said allegations. Such exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 23-07-2009 KLP