IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.V.SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 14556 of 2001 Between: 1 Pujyam Seshagiri Rao, S/o. Satyanarayana Murthy, Jalli Kakinada, Ganapavaram Mandal, W.G.District. 2 Pujyam Subba Rao, S/o. Satyam, Jalli Kakinada, Ganapavaram Mandal, W.G.District. 3 Pujyam VenKata Ratnam, S/o. Seshaiah, Jalli Kakinada, Ganapavaram Mandal, W.G.District. 4 Smt. Pujyam Sundaramma, W/o. Late Suryanarayana, Jalli Kakinada, Ganapavaram Mandal, W.G.District. 5 Smt. Allavarapu Satyavathi, W/o. Late Subba Rao, Jalli Kakinada, Ganapavaram Mandal, W.G.District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Commissioner of Endowments, Govt. of A.P., Tilak Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Kakinada, E.G.District. 3 Sri Malleswara Swami Temple, Rep.by its Executive Officer, Jalli Kakinada Village, Ganapavaram Mandal, W.G.District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus, declaring that the respondents are not entitled to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the agricultural lands being an extent of Ac.1.68 Cents in R.S.No. 61/1 ( Plot No. 1) and Ac. 3.10 Cts. in R.S.No. 32/1 (Plot No. 2) situate in Jalli Kakinada Village, Ganapavaram Mandal, West Godavari District, declaring the action of the respondents as illegal and ultra vires to the provisions of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and also the mandatory provisions of the A.P. Act 30/1987 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.S.R.ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.V.SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.14556 OF 2001 ORAL ORDER: It is represented by Sri V.S.R. Anjaneyulu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, that the cause of action in the present writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ____________________ P.V.SANJAY KUMAR, J. 10th September, 2008. VGSR