IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.3980 of 2008 Between: 1 P.Prapulla W/o.P.Radhakrishna Hindu, R/o.D.No.8/847, Jayanagar,KalyandurgVI&(M) Anantapur Dist 2 K.Ramanna S/o.Giddanna Hindu, R/o.Giribnagar,Kalyandurg(M) Anantapur Dist 3 K.Bharathamma W/o.K.Ramanna Hindu R/o.Garibnagar,Kalyandurg(M) Anantapur Dist ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Grampanchayat of Kalyandrg, Anantapur Dist 2 The Dist Panchayat Officer Anantapur Dist .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not permitting the petitioners to be in possession of the Shop No.4,5,6 in their possession while permitting others who are similarly situated to be continue in possession and enjoyment for a period of 3 years is illegal, arbitrary discriminatory without power or any authority and therefore consequently direct the respondents to reprieve from any way interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners Shop No.4,5,6 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: KOTHAPALLI RAM MOHAN CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: MRS. CH.VEDAVANI Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. N.V.RAMANA, J Dt.08.06.2009 va