IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. RSA No.350 of 1987 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.11.2009 Daulat Ram -----Appellant Vs. Phul Singh ----Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL Present:- Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondent. Adarsh Kumar Goel,J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff against decree of the courts below dismissing the suit for recovery of Rs.5900/-. 2. Case of the plaintiff was based on alleged pronote dated 6.7.1980. The defendant denied having received any money, though he admitted his thumb impression on the pronote. His case was that he was made to sign blank pronote as security for running a dairy. RSA No.350 of 1987 (O&M) 3. The trial court after considering the evidence on record held that the presumption of payment of money was rebutted from the evidence of plaintiff himself who stated that he paid the money to the Deed Writer, who in turn paid the same to the defendant, while the Deed Writer PW4 Chander Mohan denied having received the payment. 4. On appeal, finding of the trial court has been affirmed. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the record. 6. Since finding of the courts below is finding of fact based on evidence, no substantial question of law arises. 7. The appeal is dismissed. November 10, 2009 (Adarsh Kumar Goel) ‘gs’ Judge 2