IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 4251 of 2002 Between: G.Somasekhara Rao S/o. G.Narayana Rao R/o. Secunderabad, Prop: Andhra Engineering Corporation, 81, Marredpally, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Prudential Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, R.P.Road, Secunderabad. 2 The Co-operative Sub-Registrar (Arbitrator), Office of the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, City Circle, Chirag Ali Lane, Hyderabad. 3 The Co-operative Tribunal, Gaganvihar, M.J.Road, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.S.ARAVIND KUMAR FOR MR P.HARINATHA GUPTA Counsel for the respondents --- The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated above, it is prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction preferably one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent–Tribunal to take on ﬁle the Appeal in CTA SR 730 of 1998 and dispose of according to law by allowing application I.A.No.171 of 998 on the ﬁle of the third respondent.” At the hearing, Sri P.S.Aravind Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri P.Harinatha Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 25th September, 2008 vrn