jr I $-* IN TI{E HIGH COITRT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 51+ w.P.(c) 7r7u20r0 ANIL KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through \4r. S.K. Sinha, Advocate versus ADDITIONAL COMMSSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS ..... Rqspondents Through Mr. N. Waziri with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate with w.P.(c) 7r7st20r0 BAL KISHAN SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. S.K. Sinha, Advocate VETSUS - ADDITIONAL COMMSSIONER OF POLICE I AND oRS ..... Respondents Through N4r. N. Waziri with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate with s6+ w.P.(c) 7r76t20r0 JAYANTI PRASAD ..... Petitioner Through Mr. S.K. Sinha, Advocate VCTSUS ADDITIONAL COMMSSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. N. Waziri with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate with w.P.(c) 7177t20r0 f-*\ 57 + VIJAY KUMAR ..... Petitioner Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified )/ Through Mr. S.K. Sinha, Advocate versus ADDITIONAL COMMSSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Vft. N. Waziri with Mr. Shoaib Haider. Advocate with 58+ w.P.(c) 7r78t2010 i' JAI PAL ..... Petitioner t Through Mr. S.K. Sinha, Advocate VETSUS ADDITIONAL COMMSSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS ..... Respondents Through N4r. N. Waziri with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate And w.P.(c) 7r79l2oro MANOHAR LAL AHUJA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. S.K. Sinha, Advocate ADDITIONAL COMMSSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS ..... Respondents Through IVIr. N. Waziri with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER 26.10.2010 1. Notice. Mr. N. Waziri,learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of Respondents. 2. It appears to this Court that the only reason why the licences have not beeu granted to the Petitioners is that they do not have no objection certificate ('NOC') s9 + o 9 from the Fire Department. The Fire Department did in fact inspect each of the Petitioners' shops and had listed out certain defects. It is not clear whether the inspection report of the Fire Department was communicated to each of the Petitioners. 3. For avoiding any fuither delay, this Court directs that within next two days each of the Petitioners will attend the office of the Station House Officer ('SHO'), a. Police Station Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi and get a copy of the inspection report of \ the Fire Department in each of the Petitioners' cases. It will be open to the Petitioners to rectiff the defects within next one day thereafter and report back to the SHO about having rectified the defects. The Fire Department will thereafter undertake another inspection of the Petitioners' shop and deliver an NOC or otherwise to the SHO within one day thereafter. 4.If the Petitioners are still aggrieved by the decision of the Fire Department not granting licence for any reason, it witl be open to them to seek appropriate remedies, including appearing before the Joint Commissioner, Delhi Police, that may be available to them in law. 5. The petitions are disposed of in the above terms. 6. Order be given dasti under the signature of the Court Master. ocToBER 26, 2010 rk u- S.MI]RALIDHAR, J