1 S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.3455/2006 Date : 17.08.2006 HON'BLE MR.SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. M.K. Garg for the applicant. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor. Mr. Sunil Mehta for complainant. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the complainant and carefully gone through the impugned order. The allegation against the accused-applicant is that he was responsible for making fire from pistol. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that no injury was caused to anybody in this case. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application. 2 I have considered the submissions made before me and carefully gone through the material available on record. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the applicant Naval Singh alias Nen Singh son of Hazar Singh shall be released on bail in FIR No.52/2006 P.S. Panchodi, District Nagaur, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. vijayant