Criminal Misc. No.M-10490 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-10490 of 2011 Date of Decision : 4th October, 2011 Nitin @ Lally & others .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL. Present : Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for Mr. Puneet Singla, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. R. S. Rawat, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1. Mr. Jitender Kumar, Advocate for Mr. S. S. Majithia, Advocate respondent No.2. * * * * L.N.MITTAL, J. (ORAL) Nitin @ Lally and two others have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short, Cr. P.C.), for quashing FIR No.28 dated 18.03.2011 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 452, 427, 506, 148, 149 of IPC registered at Police Station Division No.3, Jalandhar, in view of compromise effected with respondent No.2- complainant, who has furnished affidavit Annexure P-3 regarding compromise. Learned counsel for respondent No.2-complainant states that respondent No.2 has effected compromise with petitioners and has furnished affidavit Annexure P-3 regarding compromise and, therefore, respondent No.2-complainant has no objection to the quashing of the impugned FIR. Criminal Misc. No.M-10490 of 2011 -2- I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. In appropriate cases, FIR can be quashed on the basis of compromise by exercising power under Section 482 Cr. P. C., even if the offences are not compoundable. It was so held by Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007(2) Law Herald (Punjab & Haryana) 2225. In the instant case, according to FIR, damage was caused to motor cycles and other household articles of the complainant party. However, complainant has effected compromise with the petitioners. The complainant is left with no grievance against the petitioners. She has no objection to the quashing of the FIR. Accordingly, it is fit case in which FIR should be quashed. In view of the aforesaid, instant petition is allowed and impugned FIR Annexure P-1 is quashed along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. ( L. N. MITTAL) JUDGE 4th October, 2011 'raj'