IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13473 of 2011 PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR SINHA @ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 363, 365, 366(A), 372, 376(2)(f)/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3,4,5,6 and 8 of the I. T. P. Act. The accusation is that Rubi Devi and Sushma Devi took the informant’s minor daughter. Subsequently daughter of the informant accepted that she has been physically abused and Rs. 1,000/- was given to her. The petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. Subsequently his name sprang up during investigation. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the case was instituted in October, 2010 and the F.I.R. named accused persons were put on trial when they were acquitted and the investigation is still pending against the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner 2 has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 180 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Nalanda at Biharshariff, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner defaults for three consecutive occasions during trial. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)