: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1106 OF 2008 IN L.C. SUIT NO.2596 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1357 OF 2008 Madhukar Shankar Kumar ..Appellant. Vs. Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority ..Respondents. Mr.Rajiv Patil i/b.Mr.Sachin Ponde for the Appellant. Mrs.Geeta P. Mulekar, AGP for Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 23RD OCTOBER, 2008 DATED : 23RD OCTOBER, 2008 DATED : 23RD OCTOBER, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : There is nothing on record to suggest that the alleged work carried out by the Respondents was pursuant to any permission for repairs from the necessary authority. The Appellant has expressed his readiness and willingness to have the work carried out in accordance with law, including the necessary permission from MHADA. The Appellant is always at liberty to make application to MHADA in that regard. 2. As it is a question of safety of the building, : 2 : it ought to be left to the necessary authorities to decide the same. 3. Needless to say, if any application is made to MHADA, MHADA shall decide the same after considering the representation. If the proposal for carrying out the repairs is made in accordance with law, even through another contractor, I have no reason to believe that MHADA will not consider such a request. 4. Appeal from Order and the Civil Application stands disposed of. ***