^~yt ^"^ rA,, '{\\^ Anil Kumar Golchha (Jain), S/o Manoharla! Goichha (Jain) , aged about 48 years, R/o Near Nandat /^ \ Naka, RajnandgaonJC.Q. State of Chhattisgc Through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Mantraiay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, /? Q-i^.-s^ Superintendent of Police, Rainandgaon (C.G.) 3 Superintendent of Poiice, Raipur (C.G.) 4 Station House Officer, Police Station Basantpur, District Rajnangaon (C.G.) 5 Jayant Maskey, S/o Rajsshvvar Rao Maskey, R/o Benind Primary Giris School, Budhapara, Raipur (C.G.) !T!QN,UNDER.ARTJCLE2260F THE fnMOTITi ITinM OR IMntn wi*»fl't^^»i a i wg gi^i^ ^»?r" Si'^L^i^ !! 3-<w3^ ,—>*•&» TB.SB <(i'T<Lii •W'ti^KS' i a'-W'ib- Shri B.D. Guru, Counsel forthe Detitioner. Shn D.K. Gwaire, Go'/i. Advocate for the State/resDondents No.1 to 4. Shrs J.D. Bajpayee and Shri Yogesh Pandey, Gounsel for respondent No.5. in «'».'»nn<!" ^ av,v^=&w^<&, Heard on admisslQn. ne petitioner, father itrtion tor issuance of a one Neha Gotohha, has fiied this t of Habeas Corpus on the ground that W.P.(Cr.)No. 1520/2008 his daughter is missing slnce 14.2.2008 and her whereabouts are not known. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in fact; the daughter of the petitioner is in illegai custody of respondent No.5 nameiy Jayant Maskey. Learned counsei for respondent No.5 ^ubmits that Neha Golchha is aged about 22 years and she had voiiintarily married with respondent No.5 - Jayant Maskey and both are residing as husband and wife. He submits that when their marriage was not accepted by the father of Neha Goich.ha (petitioner herein) and they were harassed by the local po!ice at his instance, both husband and wife had fiied a writ petition before this court for giying adequate protectlon to them vide W.P.(C) No.1466/2008. He produces the copy of the order dated 5.3.2008 passed in the said writ petition by this Court. The order passed in the said Writ Petition reads as foilows: Shri J.D. Bajpayee and Shri Yogesh Pandey, Counsei for the petitioners. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Deputy Advocate Generai with Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. Heard on adrnission. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the pstitloner No.2 hss voiuntarliy married with petitioner No.1 on 15/2/2008 at Ai-ya Samaj, Sadar, Nagpur and Shey are presently reslding as husband and v/ife. Learned counse! submit that the famiiy members ot' petitioner No.2 speciaily her father i.e. respondent No.7 is not acceptirsg She aforssaid marriage ana' faking assisfance of the Poiice, fhe petitloners are being harassed, therefore, adequate protection may be granted to them. Issue notice to the respondents on payment of P.F. with'n 7 days. i.A. No.01 Heard. This is an appiication for grant of interim relief. Issue notice on this application also, as above. As an interim measure, it is directed that fuii protection shall be given to the life and iiberty of the petitioners and they shaii not be unnecessarily harassed by the respondents on the above pretext, '^ "V I ^s^./ W.P.(Cr.)No. 1520/2008 taking notice of the fact that they have aiready marriedon 15/2/2008. Post the matter for hearing afier two weeks. Certified copy be supplied today stself." \~T; He submits that teday also, the husband and wife/are present this Court and in view of all this, no further proceeaing is reqi this matter. We have heard learned counsel t'or the parties at length !n vievi/ of the earlier order passed by tnis Court and view of the fact that the girl, who is aged about 22 yee voiuntarily married with the boy (respondent No.5 herein) both are present Defore us, submitting above facts, v/e do any reason to entertaln this petition for issuance of a writ of T'nis pet'tion is accordingly dismissed summarily. 1 also in ars tias Sd/- siiyna Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/- T.P Sharma Judge mm