IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3614 of 2011 PINTU PANDIT, SON OF SITARAM PANDIT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 17.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. As per complaint case, the marriage of complainant’s daughter had taken place in the year 2003 but subsequently, his daughter was ousted by the petitioner as well as her other in-laws on account of non-fulfilment of illegal demand. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the marriage of the petitioner had taken place with daughter of the complainant in the year 1998 but the complainant’s daughter was not able to produce any offspring and subsequently, with the consent of complainant’s daughter, the petitioner solemnized his second marriage with another woman. It is further submitted by him that after sometime some differences took place between the complainant’s daughter as well as second wife of the petitioner, which prompted the complainant to file the present case. It is also pointed out by him that in course of hearing of bail application of the petitioner, a notice was sent to the complainant’s daughter and when she was asked to lead her life with the petitioner, she flatly refused to lead her conjugal life with the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 29.12.2010. 2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura in connection with Complaint Case No. 357C of 2009. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)