MC 1652/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B K SHARMA Heard Mr. B Sinha, learned counsel for the respondents applicants as wel l as Mr. P K Patgiri, learned counsel representing the petitioner. By this application, the respondents applicants have prayed for vacation of the interim order dated 05.03.2010 by which, it was provided that status-quo with regard to appointment of respondent applicants as Anganwadi Workers/Helper s as on the date of passing the order dated 05.03.2010 should be maintained. In the writ petition the allegation of the petitioners is that some outsiders have been selected in the selection and that appropriate Roster Point have not been m aintained while selecting the candidates. In the application the respondents have denied the aforesaid allegation and infact enclosing the select list along with the application it has been show n that the select list was prepared maintaining the reservation. It is the furth er stand of the applicants that none of them are outsiders and that they belong to the particular Anganwadi Centre. Since the stalling of appointments will not serve any purpose and in mos t of the cases relating to selection and appointment of the Anganwadi Workers/He lpers it has been provided that if, any appointment is made, same will be subjec t to outcome of the writ petition, in the instant case also, the said order is r eiterated and consequently, the order of status-quo passed on 05.03.2010 stands vacated. However, it is made clear that in the event of making any appointment to the respondent applicants, same will be subject to further order be passed in t he writ petition. Misc Case stands disposed of.