IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6436 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 20.10.2011 *** Ajay Kumar .. Petitioner VS. Chiranji Lal & Ors. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate for the petitioner. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The petitioner-tenant is aggrieved with order dated 14.9.2011 passed by the learned Rent Controller by virtue of which his application for appointment of an expert for the purpose of visiting the property in question, has been dismissed. Heard. It emerges out from the paper-book that by filing the impugned application, the petitioner wants to collect the evidence by using the process of the Court, which otherwise is not permissible. The petitioner, if desirous of getting an expert examined, can well do so in his evidence, at which stage the case is presently going on. No fault of ambiguity could be found with the approach adopted by the Court below. The instant petition, being without any merit, is accordingly dismissed. (ARVIND KUMAR) October 20,2011 JUDGE Jiten