: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.334 OF 2009 Bata (India) Ltd. .. Applicants V/s. Kanchanshri Investments Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondents Mr. A.S. Khandeparkar for the Applicants. Mr. Balasaheb Deshmukh with Ms. Vidya Kamble for the Respondents. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 28 TH JANUARY, 2010. P.C.: 1. The applicants have approached this Court challenging the decree passed by the Small Causes Court, Bombay, on 10th September, 2004, in T.E. & R. Suit No.233/247 of 2001, evicting them from the suit premises. This decree has been confirmed by the Appellate Court of the Small Causes Court. The main ground on which the Suit has been decreed is that the applicants no longer enjoy the protection available to a tenant under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, since it is a Company with the paid up share capital of more than Rs.1 crore. It was held that the respondents had validly terminated the tenancy. : 2 : 2. In my opinion, the trial Court has rightly decreed the Suit and directed the applicants to vacate the suit premises. The Appellate Court has endorsed the view of the trial Court. The findings of both the Courts below are not perverse and, therefore, the Civil Revision Application is dismissed. 3. Mr. Khandeparkar, the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicants, on instructions, seeks some time to vacate the suit premises. This application is opposed by the learned Advocate for the respondents. 4. Considering the fact that the applicants are running a show room in the suit premises, in my opinion, it would be appropriate to grant some time to them to vacate the suit premises. Accordingly, the time to vacate the suit premises is extended upto 31st December, 2010 on condition that the authorized representative of the applicants shall furnish the usual undertaking to this Court within a period of two weeks from today. .......