1 caf2861 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2861 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.15166 OF 2011 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.D.R.Mahadik for the Applicant Mr.Vikrant Mhatre for the respondent no.1 CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : OCTOBER 13,2011 P.C.: 1 The learned counsel for the applicant states that the challenge in the appeal is confined to quantum of compensation and therefore, second respondent is not a necessary party. The learned counsel for the first respondent seeks time. 2 Delay is only of 41 days which has been explained in the application. Hence, rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). The claimant is permitted to withdraw further amount of Rs. 50,000/-. JUDGE