- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6443 OF 2004 ... Smt.Sunanda Vinayak Anjangaonkar ..Petitioner v/s. The Education Officer(primary) Z.P.Solapur & ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.A.B.Borkar with Mr.V.V.Purwant for the Petitioner. Mr.Nitin Jamdar for Respondent No.1. Ms.S.S.Bhende AGP for State. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & V.M.KANADE, JJ. DATED: 26TH MARCH, 2008 P.C.: 1. The Petitioner is working as Asst.Teacher in the School of the Respondent No.6. The Petitioner filed - 2 - this petition making two grievances, (i) that she is not being permitted to take admission for D.Ed. Court and she was seeking direction to grant permission to the Petitioner for D.Ed. admission through correspondence. Second grievance made by the Petitioner was that though the Petitioner was working as Asst.Teacher in the School of the Respondent No.6, she has not been paid any salary right from the year 1994. 2. So far as the first grievance is concerned, this court made an interim order dated 15-10-2004 after hearing both sides and granted interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c-1). It is common ground before us that pursuant to that order the Petitioner was given admission in the D.Ed.course and has appeared in first year correspondence course. Presently, the Petitioner is pursuing second year course. As the Petitioner has been admitted to the correspondence course and she is pursuing her studies in terms of interim order passed by this court, in our opinion, it will be in the interest of justice to direct the Respondent No.3 to continue the Petitioner’s admission for D.Ed.correspondence course and declare her result after she appeared for - 3 - examination. 3. So far as other grievance of the Petitioner is concerned, the relief is against the Respondent No.6. The Respondent No.6 has been served with the petition. Nobody is appearing for the Respondent No.6. They have also not filed any affidavit denying the allegations made in the petition that the Petitioner is working as a teacher in the school of the Respondent No.6 and for the last 10 years she has not been paid any salary. As the Petitioner is working as a teacher with the Respondent No.6, she is entitled to receive her salary from the Respondent No.6, for the period for which she has been working in the school of the Respondent No.6. 4. Rule in this petition is, therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clause (c) also. It is made clear that the relief in term of prayer clause (c) is granted only against the Respondent No.6. Petition disposed of. No order as to costs. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (V.M.KANADE, J.)