THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.817 of 2011 DT.24.01.2011 Between: Smt.E.Manju … Petitioner And The Joint Collector, Kadapa and another … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri V.Eswaraiah Chowdary Counsel for respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies The Court made the following ORDER: ORDER: The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that though an appeal was filed before respondent No.1 against order, dated 17.07.2010, passed by respondent No.2, suspending her fair price shop authorization in respect of Shop No.90, Mruthyunjayakunta, Kadapa, the same is not being disposed of. At the hearing, Sri V.Eswaraiah Chowdary, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that neither respondent No.1 has disposed of the petitioner’s stay application nor respondent No.2 has completed the enquiry and passed a final order. In the light of the above facts, in my opinion, it would be appropriate that respondent No.2 shall complete the enquiry in a time bound manner. As the petitioner evidently has not filed the explanation, in view of pendency of appeal before respondent No.1, she is permitted to submit her explanation within two weeks from today. Within one month of receipt of explanation, respondent No.2 shall hold an enquiry, pass a final order and communicate the same to the petitioner. Subject to the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.1005 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) Date: 24.01.2011 VGB