IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH MARCH 2008 / 22ND PHALGUNA 1929 CRP.No. 382 of 2004 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20/08/2003 IN EA 502/03 & EP 77/99 IN OS.969/1996 IPF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, ERNAKULAM REVN. PETITIONER: PETITIONER: JUDGMENT DEBTOR: AMBIKA, AGED 41, W/O.MANI, PULIKAPARAMBIL VEEDU, CHOTTANIKARA DESOM, KURIKKAD VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.O.V.ABRAHAM SRI.K.V.JAYACHANDRAN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS/DECREE HOLDER. K.RAJESWARI W/O. VISWANATHAN SREEVATSAM VEEDU, CHOTTANIKKARA, KURIKAD VILLAGE. THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 12/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. -------------------------------------------- C.R.P. NO. 382 OF 2004 B and C.M.APPL.NO.288 OF 2001 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th March, 2008 O R D E R Though notice was ordered on 1.4.2004, process was not paid. Most probably, the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. Today, there is no representation for the petitioner. C.M.Appl.No.288 of 2004, the application for condoning the delay of 148 days in filing the Civil Revision Petition, is, therefore, dismissed for default. Consequent on the dismissal of the application for condonation of the delay in filing the Revision, the Civil Revision Petition is also dismissed for default. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/