Letters Patent Appeal No.545 of 2007 Against the judgment dated 03.05.2007 of the learned single Judge passed in CWJC no. 7280/2004. ================================================== Vishwanath Singh, S/o Sri Ram Nandan Singh, r/o Village-Pareyam P.O. Garahuan, P.S. Kurhane, District-Muzaffarpur, presently residing At village-Bikhanpura (South), Post Office-Khabra, P.S. Sadar Bhagwanpur, District-Muzaffarpur. .... .... Appellant Versus 1.The Bihar State Electricity Board through its Secretary having Office at Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2. The Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna having Office at Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 3. The Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna having Office at Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. .... .... Respondents ================================================== For the Appellant : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar For the Respondents : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh ================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. T. MEENA KUMARI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. T. MEENA KUMARI) This is a case where the appellant has chosen to question the punishment of discharge and this is the forth attempt as observed by the 2 learned single Judge to question the order of punishment of discharge. This is the case of beating the Executive Engineer of the Electricity Board and tried to get his attendance marked by force without applying any leave. A criminal complaint was made by the said Executive Engineer and also got the instant departmental proceeding initiated which held the appellant guilty of the charges. The Disciplinary Authority has decided to impose the punishment of dismissal. The appellant herein filed writ petition in this Court. The Court has remanded the matter back to the Disciplinary Authority to pass appropriate order with reference to the Standing order. Accordingly, the order of discharge has been passed which has become subject matter in the present writ petition. The learned single Judge has noted that there is continuous attempt on the part of the appellant in filing different petition to get rid of punishment of dismissal or discharge. The learned single Judge has upheld the order of discharge on the ground that the appellant cannot challenge the order of punishment on the ground that second show cause has not been issued before passing order of discharge as the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority is out come of order passed in this Court in CWJC no. 3679 of 2000 dated 31.7.2003. 2. As contended by the learned counsel for the Board that the order of discharge cannot be interfered with as it is out come of order passed by this Court taking note of the Standing Order. 3 3. Under the above circumstances, we do not find any illegality in the order of the learned single Judge. Accordingly, the Letters Patent Appeal stands dismissed. Patna High Court, The 06th July, 2011. AAhmad/ (NAFR). (T. Meena Kumari, J.) ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)