vs s IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.3931 OF 2008 PETITION NO.3931 OF 2008 PETITION NO.3931 OF 2008 Chief Executive Officer/Chairman Maharashtra Rajya Khadi & Gramodyog Mandal ... Petitioner V/s. Jamadar Abrar Jabbar ... Respondent Mr.N.R. Patankar with V.P. Sawant for Petitioner Mr.A.M. Joshi for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J MHATRE, J MHATRE, J. DATED: AUGUST 21, 2008 AUGUST 21, 2008 AUGUST 21, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The petition challenges the interim oder of the Industrial Court passed in a complaint filed under Items 6 and 9 of the Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act. The Industrial Court has directed the petitioner not to terminate the services of the respondent-workman during the pendency of the complaint. In my view, there is no need for me to interfere with the interim order passed by the Industrial Court. However, it is clarified that the protection granted to the respondent-workman will not create any equity in his favour when the complaint is finally decided. 2. Petition rejected.