IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11333 of 2009 1. SINGASHAN THAKUR,s/o Mush Thakur 2. Bikrama Thakur,s/0 Mush Thakur 3. Narain Thakur,s/o Mush Thakur All(1 to 3) are r/o village- Masahi,P.S.-Bhagwanpur. 4. Shyam Deo Sharma,s/o late Naresh Thakur,r/o village-Majhiyaon,P.S.-Belan, All of District-Kaimur(Bhabua). Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 17-04-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that if the parties had agreed to marry Ramlal Sharma with Puja Kumari but admittedly marriage could not be finalized. Claim and counter claim are there by both the parties and more over of the similar nature complainant’s case is that he handed over rupees twenty five thousand for some purchase, while petitioners’ case is that after receiving dowry, complainant and his family members refused to marry. Whatever may be the reality, but I find that it is not a fit case in which petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail can be refused. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case No.367 of 2008, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Kaimur at Bhabua, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )