IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15181 of 2009 ANIL KUMAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 10.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, complainant and the State. In brief complainant contains every ingredient of the allegation for the offence under section 498A IPC rather serious allegation that is petitioner’s assault in life time of parents after taking wine and after death of his father making demand of she- buffalo and motorcycle rather not allowing his son in possession of the land which was given by his mother through executing a will deed which appears doubtful as while petitioner appeared in court for S.A., she states about remaining with all dignity for eight years after marriage giving birth of a son and three daughters and thereafter demand appeared to play its role and for that torture is alleged. It appears that the Court is helpless while taking cognizance in name of prima facie case otherwise it appears a game of skill brain. The complaint does not appear the version of the victim and attempt of this Court to - 2 - reconcile also is flatly refused by the wife. It further appears a game of having all landed property by filing this case though these observations cannot be taken for merit but for bail only. In the discussed suggested facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- divisional Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in Complaint Case No. 855/2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI