wcgmw/OS' lN TEE M.P. STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL M} RAIPUR\ %IGINAL APPLICATIQV NO. C \‘5 :é 1997 Ku. Shashikal a Shukla APPLICMT Aged about 40 years, D/o Bhdhran shykla Now after marriage Smt. Shashikala shukla wife of shri K.L. Shanna, R/o Krishnanagar Danganiya ward, within limit of Muncl. Corpn.Raipur. Tahsil and Distugaipur. w»\.zN.‘m...N»W‘._~.._._ w ‘ f. w g - No,....\_.m............. E Filec/ioa'ay..\L\l\.i\qY RE SP CNDENTS 3 § by 52m; QT..Q3..3¢.-...§Ms¢*\g u ersus State of M“P., through, Secretary,School Education, mantralaya Vallabh Bhawan Bhopal M.P. The Commi ssioner of Pub 1ic Instructions. Madhya Pradesh, chetak Bridge,Bhopa1.M.P. Dy. Director of Public Instructions, . M. P, State Fa; P9E§Wtran Ad”). Tn'buna/, M/hua ' ~_.a 3. m gmMINxSTRATIVE ORIGINAL APPLICATICNUNDER TRIBUNAL ACT 1$8§ SECTIGN ( No. 19 13 OF of THE 1985 STATE )READ mam ‘ ’ \ ARHCLES 14, and 16 03 THE CONSTI'I‘UTloN OF INDIA Educ ation District Mahasamund, P.O. Mahasanund, The then Digtt. RaipurMP ‘ ‘ ‘ WW mmmm AN SHRIVAST A J. SB: HON’BLE SHRI MANINDRA MOI- 07.01 .2010 Shri Anil Singh Rajput, counsel far the petitioner. Shri Ajay (Dwivedi, Deputy Government Advocate for the respondents/State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that identical cases have been decided by this Court. Ha has placed a copy of the order dated 7‘“ September, 2006 passed order. Learned counsel for the State also does not dispute this position. In view of the submission made, in W.P.(S).No.1588 of 2005. According to the petitioner, his case is squarely covered by the aforesaid the instant petition is also finally disposed of and the petitioner is granted liberty to make representation before the respondent-State authorities for their decision on the representation in the light of order dated Malikram Sidar and others vs; State (Original Application No. 624/1997) by :he Tribunal. The petition stands finally disposes of. 22.03.1997 passed in the case of of Madhya Pradesh and others Sd/.- Manindra Mohan Stirivastava Judge ' [ntééfe'a