1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Contempt Petition No.122 of 2011 In Writ Petition No.1873 of 2011 (D) (Balakram s/o Makhanlal Chopra and others v. Union of India, Indian Railways, and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Smt. Rashi Deshpande, Advocate for Petitioners. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 4 th July, 2011 1. The Division Bench of this Court by its order dated 25-4-2011 passed in Writ Petition No.1873 of 2011, had directed the Central Administrative Tribunal to decide the Original Application in accordance with law. This Court had also recalled the order of status quo, which was the subject-matter of challenge in the writ petition and further directed that the process of selection may go on, however the Department shall not issue any order of appointment till such time the issue is decided by the Tribunal on merits. 2. Smt. Deshpande, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, has invited my attention to Annexure-F, which is the Panel of Selection prepared on 16-6-2011 for promotion to the post of Loco Inspector. She submits that such a list of selected 2 candidates has been directed to be published in a weekly Gazette. 3. On a specific question being put to the learned counsel for the petitioners as to whether the orders of appointments have been issued to the persons selected, her answer is “No”. It is thus apparent that it is merely a Panel of Selection and no orders of appointments have been issued. This Court had permitted the respondents to go on with the process of selection. Hence, there is no question of willful disobedience/breach of the order of this Court. 4. The contempt petition is, therefore, dismissed. Judge pdl