:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION JUDGES ORDER NO. 89 OF 2008 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 46 OF 2008 IN APPEAL NO. 291 OF 2005 IN REVIEW PETITION NO.42 OF 2004 IN NOTICE NO.1007 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO. 3432 OF 1987 Moolchand K. Rankaandors ...Plaintiffs Versus Manohar V.Telang and Ors. ....Defendants ====== Mr.P.K.Samdani i/by. Mr.Y.S.Bhansali, Adv. for the plaintiffs/applicants. Mr.J.S.Chandnani,Adv. for respondent nos.1 and 3. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 2ND APRIL, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . No R & P. :2: :2: :2: 1. Heard Mr.Samdani appearing for the Original Plaintiffs/Apellants/Decree holders and Mr.Chandnani appearing for respondent nos.1 and 3. 2. Perused the Affidavit-in-support. In my view, Respondent nos.1 and 3 need not have any apprehension, inasmuch as, their proceedings which are pending are in no way affected by this order. The order passed today will be without prejudice to all the rights and contentions of both sides in the pending proceedings before the Appellate Court. 3. In the light of the contents of the Affidavit in support, it is directed that the Execution Application shall proceed without insisting upon a drawn up Order of the Appellate Court’s Order dated 11.10.2007 being produced or annexed to the proceedings. The Office to proceed on the basis of the Minutes of the Appellate Court’s order of the above date. Judges Order is disposed off with these directions. sd/- ***********