THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.4980 of 2011 ORDER: An extent of Ac.11.62 cents in Mukthinuthalapadu Village, Prakasam District owned by the petitioner was acquired by the Government in the year 1984 under the Land Acquisition Act (for short ‘the Act’). An award was passed fixing the market value for the land at the rate of Rs.12,000/- per acre. Reference sought for by the petitioner under Section 18 of the Act was taken up by the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole as L.O.P.No.103 of 1986. Through its order, dated 18.11.1997, the trial Court enhanced the compensation to Rs.22,000/- per acre. Not satisfied with the compensation, the petitioner filed A.S.No.344 of 1998 before this Court seeking enhancement. The respondent on the other hand filed A.S.No.965 of 1999 questioning the enhancement ordered by the trial Court. May be for want of proper coordination, the appeals referred to above were dealt with separately. A.S,No.344 of 1988 was allowed by a Division Bench of this Court on 04.07.2008 enhancing the compensation to Rs.60,000/- per acre. About six months thereafter, A.S.No.965 of 1999 was dismissed by another Division Bench on 21.12.2009. The petitioner filed E.P.No.156 of 2009 to recover the enhanced compensation. It appears that a representation was made on behalf of the respondent that there are conflicting judgments rendered by the High Court and clarification is needed. Taking that representation into account, the executing Court passed an order on 16.09.2011 requiring the A.G.P. to seek clarification from the Government and a further direction was issued to deposit the admitted amount, meaning thereby the one determined by the trial Court. The petitioner feels aggrieved by the said order. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Arbitration. It has already been mentioned that the market value that was determined by the Land Acquisition Officer at Rs.12,000/- per acre was enhanced by the trial Court to Rs.22,000-/- and that in turn was further enhanced by this Court to Rs.60,000/-. Though A.S.Nos.344 of 1998 and 965 of 1999 filed by the claimant on the one hand and the Government on the other against the same award/decree were disposed of at different points of time, there is no conflict in the orders passed therein. There was absolutely no basis for the respondent to represent that any clarification is needed. Therefore, the civil revision petition is allowed and the executing Court is directed to proceed to enforce the decree passed by this Court in A.S.No.344 of 1998. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 29.11.2011 JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.4980 of 2011 Date: 29.11.2011 JSU