HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(S) No. 2162 of 2008 V Smt. im Mehar W/o Premlal Mehar Aged about 24 years, R/Q Rawan (Grasim) ’I‘ah. — Simga, Distt. Raipur (C. G.) Versus State of Chhath‘sgarh Through: Secretaly man and C Welfare, Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Collector pur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3 Chief Executive O$cer Janpa Panchayat Simga, Ditt. ~— Raipur (con) The Pmject Ofiir, Janpad Panchayat, Simga, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Gr Panchayat Rawan Through Sarpanch Gra Pagchayat Rawan, Post Rawan, Tah.- Simga Distt‘ Raipur (C.G.) Smt. Kewm Bai W/o Khubchand Verma, Aaganbadi Kaxyakara, Vill. Rawan (Grasim Gate) Post- Rawan‘, Tah. ~ Simga Distt. Rjpur (c.G.) Writ Petitig under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Appearance: Shri J.K. Shastri, cnsel or the petiu’oner. ou f Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State] respondents No. to 4. ORAL ORDER (15.04.2008) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard. The petitioner was a candidate for appoinmlent to the post of Aganbadi worker. By way of this writ peh'tion, she has chanenged ' VJMW the seleciion/appointment order dated 18.9.2006 (AnnemxeePIS) with regard to respondent No.6 and she has challenged her non— xselechon w1th a further prayer to lssue a d1rect10n to respondents S PETITIONER K RESPONDENTS Wo hild Rai d s ce am m t a 1 2 W.P.(S} No. 21 62 of 2008 No. 1 to 5 to select]appoint the petitioner in place of respondent ' No.6 considering her preferential rights as per gui‘ieh‘nes issued in this regani. In View of the provisions of statutoly appeal against such action] onier, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition at this stage. The peiition is accordingly disposed of: However, 1he petiu‘oner shall be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy in this regard. e‘E—R i M v“ Sd/- (7!, CJ"! Sunil Kumar Sinha: Judge