THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S. RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.16960 of 2011 Dated:01.07.2011 Between: Mr.Panthula Janaki Rama Jogarao. … Petitio And The Vizianagaram Municipality, Rep.by the Municipal Commissioner, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District, And another. ... Responde THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S. RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.16960 of 2011 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) The petitioner statedly is an Advocate of Vizianagaram. He is the owner residential house bearing Door No.23-8-8A, Veluthurivari Street, Vizianagaram. property is assessed to tax vide assessment No.1093043152. The sec respondent issued a special notice as per Rule 4 read with Rules 10 and 1 Schedule II of the Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965. Allegedly the petitio filed a revision on 28.02.2011 and also sent the same by registered post w acknowledgement due. Nevertheless, by impugned endorsement dated 16.04.2 the first respondent rejected the revision petition on the ground that it was submitted within the period of thirty days. At the stage of preliminary hearing on 24.06.2011 counsel for the petitio Ms.T.V.Sridevi was vehement enough to convince us that the petitioner has se representation on 28.02.2011, and that it is within time as per Rule 12 of Schedu of the Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act. We, therefore, requested her to pl before us some proof either acknowledgement or the postal receipt evidenc dispatch of the revision petition on 28.02.2011 as deposed in paragraph 7 of the affidavit. Today Sri C.Upendra, Counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that there is such proof which can be produced in support of the affidavit averments. In absence of any such proof we cannot decide the disputed question of fact nor we any error in the impugned order. The Writ Petition is dismissed in limine. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________ (V.V.S. RAO ____________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN 01.07.2011 vs