HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25103 OF 2010 ORDER: Petitioner is employed as a Lab Assistant in Madina Engineering College, Kadapa, respondent herein. By an order dated 08-07-2009, respondent placed the petitioner under suspension on the ground that a criminal case was instituted against him. Petitioner challenges the said order. 2. Petitioner states that the criminal case instituted against him was ended in acquittal. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. 4. Basically the writ petition is not maintainable, since the respondent is a private educational institution and the petitioner does not complain violation of any specific provision of law. In case, the petitioner feels that the very basis of the suspension ceased to exist, he can file a representation to the respondent narrating the relevant facts. 5. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to make a representation narrating his grievance or to pursue the remedies in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J October 20, 2010. KTL