164wp5520.09.odt 1 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.5520 of 2009 (Dr.(Mrs.) Manjusha w/o. Sushil Kalmegh .vs. State and Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Coram: D. D. Sinha and F. M. Reis, JJ. Date : 16/04/2010. Heard Mr. Anand Parchure, Adv. for petitioner, Mr.J.B.Jaiswal, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos. 1, 2 and 4 and Mr.Madhav Lakhe, Adv. for respondent no.3. In the instant petition, the grievance of petitioner is in respect of non-grant of approval to the post of Lecturer held by the petitioner after her selection on the said post by respondent no.3, after following the due procedure applicable in this regard. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the reason for refusal to grant approval is that the petitioner is over-age. It is contended that, the petitioner being a in-service candidate, the stand taken by respondent nos. 1 and 2 is not sustainable in law in view of decision of the Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court, dt 9.3.2006 rendered in Writ Petition No. 3139 of 2005. Mr. J.B.Jaiswal, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos. 1 and 2 has submitted that the case of petitioner for grant of approval is being re-considered in the light of said decision. This fact is already mentioned in para 3 of the affidavit dt. 164wp5520.09.odt 2 . 18.3.2010 filed on record by respondent nos. 1 and 2. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, we dispose of present petition with a direction to respondent nos. 1 and 2 to take a decision accordingly within a period of two weeks from today. Till then, interim order dt. 11.1.2010 shall continue to operate. Copy of this order duly authenticated be supplied to the learned Counsel for respective parties. JUDGE JUDGE jais