IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.433 of 2004 OM PRAKASH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the petitioner : None For the opposite parties : Mr. Amanullah, SC 17 Mr. M.K.Fattah, JC to SC 17 -------- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ---- Dated, the 07th July, 2008. On 18.01.2001, the following order came to be passed. “In my view, if the claim of the petitioners is identical to that of Yogendra Raut, they should file a detailed representation before the Director, Secondary Education (respondent no.2), which shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. It goes without saying if on scrutiny, the claim of the petitioners is found similar to that of Yogendra Raut, necessary relief, which was granted to him, be also granted to the petitioners.” 2. The show cause has been filed by opposite party no.2 and the following statement has been made therein: “2. That it is humbly stated and submitted that on getting the necessary record from the District Education Officer, Patna vide his letter no.445 dated 20.04.2005 and on getting the advise of the Finance Department necessary order has been passed and communicated to all concerned vide memo no.83 dated 24.01.2005. A true copy of Memo no.83 dated 24.01.2006 is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure-A to this show cause. - 2 - 3. That from the facts and circumstances stated herein above it is evident that the order of the Hon’ble Court has been fully complied with and as such the answering opposite party deserves to be discharged.” 3. We have no justifiable reason in not accepting the aforesaid statement. 4. As a matter of fact, no rejoinder has been filed by the petitioner trasversing the statement made by opposite parties in paragraphs 2 and 3. 5. We are, thus, satisfied that nothing remains to be done in this MJC and it is disposed of accordingly. R.M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J. Sunil