Smmg mm R IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (227) N0. a %$/2010 (S3,) PETITIONER/ THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. NEAR JHANKAR ‘ CINEMA, DEFENDANT NO. 3 THROUGH THE BRANCH MANAGER, JAGDALPUR, DIST. BASTAR (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS/ l. KT BALIRAM BAGHEL PLAINTIFF " AGED 50 YEARS, AM V $WW a kq gag?) $1A‘Mv g i} $10 2‘40 QwWW La L POST S/o VILLAGE MULI, CHHAPA *v :BAGLmLfJg‘ PADAR, 7 ’W (A ma............... _ DISTRICT BASTAR (CG) DEFENDANT NO. 1 2. GANESHRAM, S/O SHRI MAIRK @ MAHESH RAM, R/O VILLAGE MULI, POST MULTI, DISTRICT BASTAR (CG) DEFENDANT NO; 2 3. / RAKESH KUMAR UMARVAISHYA, S/O BANSHIDHAR UMARVAISHYA, R/O POWER HOUSE ROAD, JAGDALPUR, DISTRICT BASTAR (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF W THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA I HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 'a SB: Hon’ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra ‘VVrit Petition £227} N0. 4762/2010 PETITIONER : The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Versus RESPONDENTS : Baliram Baghel and others Appearance: Shri Anil Maurya, counsel for the petitioner. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ‘ ORAL ORDER (25.08.2010) This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner, challenging the order passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rejecting his application under section 170 ofthe Motor Vehicles Act, Without tiling the copy of the reply filed by the owner before the Claims Tribunal. In the opinion of this court, in the absence of all the documents necessary for proper and effective disposal of this writ petition, it cannot be entertained. (2) In View of the above, the instant writ petition under article 227 of the Constitution of India is dismissed. However, the petitioner shall beat liberty to file a properly constituted writ petition afresh. Sill/n u Prashant Kumar Mishral Judge