HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22088 of 2011 Date:14.09.2011 Between: Srinivas Goud and four others. ..... Petitioners AND The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Reptd by its Commissioner, Hyderabad and five others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri R.Raghunandan Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4: Dr.Y.Padmavathi, Standing Counsel for GHMC Counsel for Respondent Nos.5 and 6 : --- The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in taking action against the illegal construction being made by the owners of Plot No.3 in Sy.Nos.1 to 13, 17, 19 to 21 of Seri Nallagandla Village and Sy.Nos.12 to 27 of Nalagandla Village, under Serilingampally Mandal and Municipality, Rangareddy District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and Articles 14, 17, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents to take action to demolish the illegal constructions being made on Plot No.3 in Sy.Nos.1 to 13, 17, 19 to 21 of Seri Nallagandla Village and Sy.Nos.12 to 27 of Nalagandla Village, under Serilingampally Mandal and Municipality, Ranga Reddy District.” At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. The request of the learned counsel for the petitioners is accepted. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.26911 of 2011 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 14th September, 2011 DR