cra3342.11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3342 OF 2011 1) Gorakh s/o Shankar Teke, Age-45 years, Occu:Agril., R/o-Wari, Tq-Kopargaon, Dist-Ahmednagar, 2) Sau. Anita w/o Gorakh Teke, Age-40 years, Occu:Household, R/o-Wari, Tq-Kopargaon, Dist-Ahmednagar. ...APPLICANTS. VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra, 2) The Police Inspector, Kopargaon Police Station, Tq-Kopargaon, Dist-Ahmednagar. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.V.R. Dhorde Advocate for Applicants. Shri.S.G. Nandedkar, A.P.P. for Respondents. ... CORAM: T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATE : 11TH AUGUST, 2011 cra3342.11 2 PER COURT : 1. This Application is filed for anticipatory bail in C.R. No.M-6 of 2010 registered in Kopargaon Police Station, Dist- Ahmednagar for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 464, 465, 467, 471, 474, 197, 191, 192, 193, 195, 198, 34 etc. of the Indian Penal Code. One private complaint is referred to the Police for investigation. The papers of investigation were made available. Both the sides are heard. 2. The complainant has made allegations that with the help of one doctor, the present Applicants created false record of admission and treatment and that record is used in criminal case which is filed against the complainant by Police. The contention shows that Investigating Officer believed in that record and that record is used in criminal case which is filed against the cra3342.11 3 complainant. The doctor who allegedly created the false record, is granted anticipatory bail by this Court. In view of the nature of dispute and aforesaid circumstances, this Court holds that subject to some conditions, relief can be granted to the Applicants. 3. The Criminal Application is allowed. Interim relief granted by this Court in favour of the Applicants by order dated 2nd August, 2011, is confirmed, subject to conditions that the Applicant No.1 -Gorakh s/o Shankar Teke is to attend the concerned Police Station on every Sunday between 9.00 a.m. and 12.00 noon for the period of one month from today and he is to co- operate with the Investigating Officer. He is not to tamper with the prosecution witnesses. [T.V. NALAWADE, J.] asb/AUG11