THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.26899 OF 2006 Dated 29th July, 2010 Between: Vadde Srinivasulu and others …Petitioners And The Superintending Engineer and four others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri Ramakrishna Pativada for Sri S.Srinivas Reddy Counsel for respondents 2 & 3: AGP for Revenue Counsel for respondent No.5: Ms M.Vidyavathi The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents 1 to 4 in not preventing respondent No.5 from removing the bund of river penna and laying a ramp and a road to quarry sand from Inamadugu- Jammipalem Village joint sand reach, which is contrary to the Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966 in spite of the representations made by the petitioners, villagers of Inamadugu Village and also the resolution of the Inamadugu Gram Panchayat dated 30.11.2006, as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India and issue a consequential direction to respondents 1 to 4 to take immediate action and ensure that respondent No.5 quarries sand by using the existing ramp and road only.” At the hearing, Sri Ramakrishna Pativada, learned counsel representing Sri S.Srinivas Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP No.34564 of 2006 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 29th July, 2010 vrn