IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 22ND SEPTEMBER 2011 / 31ST BHADRA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 982 of 2011(S) ----------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.12251/2011 Dated 12/04/2011 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN THE W.P.NO.12251/2011 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RASIYA BEEGUM.M.L., AGED 32, JUNIOR HEALTH INSPECTOR GRADE II, POST MARTUM UNIT, SREE AVITTOM THIRUNAL HOSPITAL, MEDICAL COLLEGE.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695011. BY ADVS. SRI.VAKKOM N.VIJAYAN SMT.V.RENJU SRI.P.ANIYAN SMT.M.A.RAMITHA RESPONDENT(S): IST RESPONDENT IN W.P.NO.12251/2011 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SRI.RAJEEV SADANANDAN, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. JAMES MATHEW KADAVAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: STU COC.NO.982/2011 S APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE I : CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT IN WP NO.12251/2011 DTD 12/04/2011. ANNEXURE II : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DTD 26/05/2011 OF THE REPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL //TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE STU S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Con. Case (C) No.982 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 22nd day of September, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner complains of non-compliance with the directions in Annexure A1 judgment, wherein, I directed the Superintendent of Sree Avittam Thirunal Hospital, Thiruvananthapuram to consider and pass orders on Ext.P11 application produced in the writ petition. The learned Government Pleader today hands over a copy of the order passed on Ext.P11 application to the counsel for the petitioner. In the above circumstances, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the same appropriately, if the same is adverse to the petitioner, this Contempt of Court Case is closed. Sd/- S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE //True copy// P.A. TO JUDGE shg/