IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12687 of 2011 PANDIT YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The F.I.R. was lodged on 25.01.2010 when dead body with knife injury was recovered. None identified the dead body hence, the case was instituted against unknown. The witness in paragraph nos. 66 and 67 of the case diary on 29.07.2010 stated that they came to know about the actual accused of the case and named the petitioner. It is submitted that the paragraph no. 67 of the case diary contends the statement of the father-in-law of the victim who made this statement when he went to receive the death certificate and post mortem report. Raising of suspicion after six months of institution of the case clouds the bonafide of accusation, let the petitioner, above named, be released on 2 bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Paraiya P.S. Case No.07 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)