THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO C.M.A. No. 1185 of 2011 JUDGMENT: The appeal is filed against the order dated 31.03.2004 in W.C.No.15 of 1997 on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Nalgonda questioning the quantum of compensation. The appellant is said to have received injuries in a motor accident on 13.03.1996 while in course of employment as a driver of the lorry bearing No.AATK-9879 belonging to the 1st respondent insured with the 2nd respondent. After considering the evidence on record, the Commissioner granted a compensation of Rs.74,095/-. The grievance of the appellant herein is that he was earning wages of more than Rs.2,000/- per month but only minimum wages was applied. Furthermore, the injury caused to the petitioner is of a permanent disability and the evidence of the doctor about 30% disability cannot be taken and, therefore, the compensation fixed by the Commissioner is not proper. Evidently, it is not a non-schedule injury, which has been received by the petitioner and the evidence of the doctor clearly goes to show that 30% is the extent of disability. Evidently, there is also no material to show that there was disability of more than 30%. So far as the salary of the appellant is concerned, there is no proof and consequently the minimum wages were taken into consideration. Therefore, the order passed by the Commissioner cannot be said to be irregular. But, however, the learned counsel for the appellant says that future interest is not granted by the Commissioner. In case the amount was not deposited within 30 days as directed by the Commissioner, the petitioner will be entitled to the interest at 7.5% per annum. With the above modification, the appeal is allowed. No costs. ________________________ N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO, J 14-09-2011 MR THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO C.M.A.No. 1185 of 2011 DATE: 14-09-2011 MR