1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Writ Petition No.6892 of 2008 Al-Azhar Yakub Contractor & ors. Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & anr. Respondents Mr.Iqbal Chagla, Sr.Counsel i/b. M/s.Federal & Rashmikant for petitioners. Mr.S.N.Patil, AGP for State. Mr.A.A.Garge for resp.no.2. CORAM: BILAL NAZKI & S.J.VAZIFDAR,JJ. October 8, 2008. P.C. . The case of the petitioner is that while rejecting his application for grant of permission to develop the property, the only reason given in the impugned order is that though the plot has become dereserved under Section 126 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, but the Corporation intends to seek acquisition of land through the State Government. This could not be the reason, according to the learned Senior Counsel, on which the permission could have been rejected. Prima facie we feel that the Corporation having the intentions of seeking acquisition of land could not reject the application seeking permission to develop the property. 2 Therefore, we direct the Corporation to consider application of the petitioner afresh and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. . With the agreement of the learned counsel for the parties, the petition is disposed of with these directions. (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (BILAL NAZKI,J.)