.^•<^ ^p ^y,...--7 ^TN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. (Cl No. ^S^4 of 2010 PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENT Smt. Meenu Chhabra, aged about 30 years, W/o Devendra singh Chhabra, R/o Chirmiri, Distt. Koria (C.G. ) Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) <.^^.^iyr%^%^^, ^^^s^^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 ^- 1 lc^ HJGH.COURTOFCHHAITiSGARHAI.BSU^SS-(UR WRIT PE"nTION (G) NO. 2864 012010 Petitioner Versus Respondent Smt. Meenu Chhabra Reglonai Transport Authority WRIT PE'flTION UNDER A.RTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTiON OF iNDJA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotrt, J.) Present:- Shri Santosh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashahk Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER on 23rti 'Dsy ofJune, 2010). With the consent of-leamed coynsei for the partles, tlie mattef Is heard flnaiiy. 1.. Grievance of' the petitjoner Is that on 05/04/2010 (Annexure P/1), the petitioner nrsoved 'an appJication before the respoiicle.nt tbr change of tlmjng.of regyiar permjt no, 3477/B/09,'on the' route Chirmiri'to Bilaspyr and back return trip daiiy» However, tiij date the same has not been decided bythe respondent» 2» Learned counsel for the petitioner sybmits that this. petition rnay be dlsposed of with a direction to the respondent to decide the said applicatjon expeditiousjy,. 3. Learned counsel for the State submlts that application of the pet'rtioner shaii be consldered and decided, in accordance with law.and on its own merits, within a reasonabie period t'rom 'the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4< in view of foregojng, this petition is disposed of wlth a djrection to the respondent to declde the appiication dated: 05/04/2010 fited by the petitioner within a reasonable pefiod from the of recejpt of a copy of this order, - 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dlsposed of. | Sd/- 1 SatishK. Agnihotri Judge Arun M£3SSSV£ L;£i^'£.£'.ea8te-:--—>&j«sC*'">S«ii