^ 1. 2. 3. 4. Arun Agi-awal, aged 20 years, Harinara.yna Agrawal, r/o. 407, Gayatri Maadir Ward, Station Road, Durg (CG) Raien Agrawal, aged 38. years, Son of Shri Raia Niwas, Kesident ot Narbada, Near Cify Club, Station Road, Dui^ (CG) Bofh Directors of M/s. Shree Sito, ISDS.I siiil Powcr FVt, Lnnited, Haviag its registered office at Behiad District Court MiB Para, Durg (CG) and Works at Borjhara, Guina-L'rla Road, Potice Station. urla, District Raipur (CG) Mahavir Prasad Agrawal, aged 59 vears, Son of Shri Nandlal Agrawal, resident of 188, Aiya Nagar, Dui-g (CG) Rajendra Prasad Agrawal, aged 52 years, Son of Shri Madanlal Agrawal, resident of Q. No. 411/A, Gayabi Mandir Ward, Station Road, Durg (CG) Siuesh Agrawal, aged 50 years, Son of Shri Jhiunar Lal Agrawal, resident of 410, Gayatri. Maiidir Ward, Durg (CG) AU Ex-Directors of M/s. Shree Sita Ispat and Power Private Limited. Versus 1. Chhattisgarh Conservation (CG) Through Chhattisgarh Conservation Office, New h Tatibandh Raipur (CQ) Environinent Board, Raipur Regional Officer Environinent Board, Regional lig 9 ,10 & 11, Raipur District - 2-- 2. The State of Cbliattisgarh through fhe Principal Secretaiy, Departin.ent of Housing and Envii'oninent, DKS bhawan, Maatralaya, G.E. Road, Raipur (CG) 3. Shrce Sita. Ispat and Power Private Limited, Having its registered office at Behind District Court Mill Para, Dur^ (CG) and Works at Gram. Borjhara, Guina Uria Road, Police Station Urla Distt. Raipur (CG) (SB iHon'ble Shri T.P.Sharma, J.) Prcsent: Shri Md. Asif, couiisel for tfae petitioner. Shri Sudhir Bajpai, Advocate with Shri Viinlesh Bajpai, counsel foi respondent No. 1. Shri U.K.S.Chaadel, paael Lawyer for the State/respondent No.2. Shri S.K.Tiwari, counsel for respondent No.3. (Passed on 7th March 2008) This petition is directed agai&st fhe orders dated 26.4.2005, 5.7.2005, 23.8.2005, 30.9.2005, 16.11.2005, 24,11,2005 aud 6.1.2006 passed by fhe leamed Cbief Judicial Magistrate, Raipur purporttrig to take cogruzaa.ee of the offences under Sections 37 and 40 of the Air (Prevention aud Control of PoUution) Act, 1981 read wifh Sqgtion 34 of the IPC a^aiast the petitioners. 2. The instaiit' petition is filed for quashinent of com.plain.t case No. 767/2005 pend'irig before fhe Ghief Judicial Magistrate, Raipyr for fhe offence puiushable under Section 37 aad 40 of fhe Air (Prevention and Control ofPoUution) Act, 1981 read with Section 34 ofthe IPC. ^' '•—--» -s. 3. During fhe course of arguinent, it is subuiitted on behalf of the parties that ia the light of order dated 7th August 2007 passed by this Court in Cr.M.P. No. 176/2006, fhe complaint pendiag before the trial Court is not coiapeten.t and libqrty be extended to the respondent No. 1 to file fresh coaiplaiat. ^.ug'ur'a 4. In the light of the onler dated 7th August 2007 passed by this Court in Cr.M.P. No. 176/200$, which is ofsirmlar nature, the com.plaiut aad proceediug pending before fhe Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raipur deserves to be quashed and is^p.ereby quashed. However, it shallbe open to fhe respondent Board to, file fi-esli complaiat, disclosiag all uecessary particulars, which may fasten the cruainal Uability agam.st fhem, if they so desire. Sd/- T.P.Sharma Judge ^ -l-.i L ^^a-.-asiijifiSiSstsffisaaas^sas^s^sBs^^