WP(C) 601/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE K. MERUNO Heard Ms. K. Devi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and also Mrs. M. Gogoi Medhi, learned Standing Counsel for the Education Depart ment. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petiti oner is squarely covered by a judgment and order passed in W.P.' No.6756 of 2010 , which was disposed of on 21.12.2010. She, therefore, prays that this writ peti tion may be disposed of in terms of the said judgment and order dated 21.12.2010 . Mrs. M. Gogoi Medhi, learned Standing Counsel for the Education Department sub mits that since the Court has already passed an order in a similar matter, this Court may pass any order. On perusal of the judgment and order dated 21.12.2010 and also the pleadings of the writ petition, the present writ petition being id entical and the issues raised in this writ petition is the same as read in W.P.' No.6756 of 2010, this writ petition is disposed of in the light of the said jud gment and order dated 21.12.2010. The present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority praying for relax ation of the qualification and in case such an application is filed, the same sh all definitely be considered and disposed of by the authority in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible by a speaking and reasoned order so that if the relaxation is given in exercise of the powers conferred under Rule 30 of the 2003 Rules, the petitioner is not deprived from participating in the select ion process. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs .