IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH MAY 2011 / 20TH VAISAKHA 1933 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1299 of 2011() ------------------------------ CRA.226/2008 of ADDL.SESSIONS COURT,-I, MAVELIKKARA CC.958/2005 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, CHENGANNUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED ------------------------------------------------- MANOJ UNNITHAN, S/O.MADHAVAN UNNITHAN, INDIRA BHAVANAM, MANNARASALA PO, HARIPPAD. BY ADV. SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN SRI.G.SUDHEER RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------- 1. P.M.MADHUSOODANAN PILLAI, S/O.K.R.MADHAVAN PILLAI, PUTHEN PURAYIL VEEDU, PANDANAD WEST P.O., CHENGANNUR, PIN-689 506. 2. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.RAJAN VISHNURAJ FOR R1 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.C M CHARISMA THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------- Crl.R.P.No.1299 of 2011 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of May 2011 Order It is submitted by both sides that the parties have settled the matter and have filed a compounding petition. The amount at 15% required to be paid in the light of the decision of the Apex Court in Damodar.S.Prabhu V. Sayed Babalal (JP 2010(4) SC 457) has already been deposited. The composition is recorded and the same will have the effect of acquittal as provided under Section 20(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Cr.R.P. is disposed of as above. N.K.Balakrishnan, Judge sta 2 3