THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.21370 of 2006 DATED: 05.07.2010 Between: Chintala Madhusudan and another .. Petitioners And The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Hyderabad and others. .. Respondents ORDER: Petitioners claim that they are in occupation of the land in Sy.No.295, in an extent of 500 square yards, situated at Gudimalkapur, Hyderabad, that they have also made representation to the competent authority long back for allotment of the said land to them, on the ground that their father was a freedom fighter, and, in spite of their repeated requests, no action had been taken thereon, and, in the meantime, the 1st respondent Corporation, at the instance of the other respondents herein, who are revenue officials, demolished part of the structures raised by them in the subject land. Hence, they filed the present writ petition seeking appropriate directions. A detailed counter-affidavit is filed on behalf of the 1st respondent, categorically stating that the respondent Corporation has not taken any action for demolition of any structures in the subject land. It is further stated that, after the present writ petition is filed, the officials of the Corporation have inspected the subject land and found no structures existing therein, but however, some constructions are being made there and the enquiries revealed that the Government allotted the said land to A.P.Transco, which is making those constructions. It is also further stated that the 1st respondent has no power to consider the representation of the petitioners for allotment of the subject land to them. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent- Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for other respondents. Admittedly, the petitioners have no right, title or ownership over the subject land and they seek allotment of the said land to them, on the ground that their father was a freedom fighter. Though, according to them, they are in occupation of the subject land and part of the structures raised by them were demolished by the 1st respondent Corporation, the same is denied by the 1st respondent and it is their case that they found no structures existing in the subject land, when they inspected the site, and that the A.P. Transco., which is said to have been allotted the said land by the Government, is making constructions on the land. In the circumstances, the relief as sought by the petitioner cannot be granted by this Court, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is devoid of merits and is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. ____________________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 5th July, 2010 IBL