L^: HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, Rll A<ioi i^ REVIEW PETITION N0.35/2011 PETITIONER ShankarManikpuri, S/o. ShriAlam Sai Manikpuri, aged about 65 yeare, R/o Village Girvarganj, P.S. Surajpur, District Sarguja (C.G.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Home Department, Mantralay, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter Raipur, District Raipur 3. Superintendent of Police, Bilaspur, Djstrict Bilaspur (C.G.). 4. Sub Divisional Officer, Police Gaurela, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Station House Officer. Police Statton Gaurela, District Bilaspur (C.G.) REVIEW PETITION FOR RE-CALL OF ORDER DATED 22.02.2011 Appearance: Mr. Shrawan Agrawal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate forthe State enadvance copy. SUNILKUMARSINHA.J. ORALORDER (27.06^0liy Heard. The petitioner is seeking review ofthe order dated 22.02.2011 passed in W.P.(Cr) No. 7646/2010. The last 3 paras of ttie impugned order woutd show that in view of the contents of the resporase as also contents of Annexure-R-1, Mr. Shrawan Agrawal, learned counsel, who appeared on behsrff of ttie petitioner. sought permission to wjthdraw the writ petition with liberty to fito another writ petition or avail other remedy, iffuture development so warranls. REVIBW PETITIONN0. 35/2011 Permission was granted and accordingly, ttie writ petMlon was disposedofas withdrawn with the aforesaid liberiy granted in favour ofttie petitioder. Mr. Shrawan ^rawal submits that friough Annexure-R-1 contains the report relating to 3 bottles prepared from the viscera of the deceased but it does not contain the report of the 4th bottle, in which the skin of ttie deceased was preserved. Hesubmits that he could not notice thatthere was no report in relation to bottte no. 4 and the petition waswfthdrawn, ttierefore, this review petition has been filed. However, looking to the fact that a liberty was already reserved in favour of the petitioner to ffle subsequent writ petition. he seeks permission to withdraw this review petjtion to avail the said llberty. Permission granted. Accordingly, the review petition is disposwl ofas wi&idravm. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Rahul