1 wp8453.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8453 OF 2010. Mr. Venu Gopal ... Petitioner. Vs. Mr. Atmaram Shaankar Pavenkar & Ors. ... Respondents ...... Mr.P.K. Dhakephalkar a/w Ramesh A. Karale i/by Ram Gangapure for the Petitioner. Mr. S.L. Mhatre for Respondent Nos. 1 and 8. Mr. Aashish Gatagat i/by Chetan Patil for Respondent No.10. ...... CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 21ST OCTOBER, 2010. P. C. 1. heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The petitioner is original plaintiff, who has filed R.C.S.No. 318 of 2008, pending before the 3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D., Panvel for injunction against defendant Nos. 1 to 9. Respondent No.10, who claims to have purchased certain flats in the building from the other defendants pending the suit, moved the application Exh.33 to be impleaded as a defendant. That application was allowed by the trial Court by impugned order dated 28-9-2010. The 2 wp8453.10.sxw plaintiff has challenged the said order in present petition. 2. Respondent No.10 has vital interest in the property involved in the suit and therefore, he wants to be impleaded as defendant so that his interest in the property may be properly protected and he can defend the suit. He cannot be deprived of this rights. In fact, it will be in the interest of justice that he should be given an opportunity to defend his right. If said right is not given and if other defendants dispose of the property before the suit is finally decided, they may not have any interest in defending the suit and that may adversely affect the rights of the purchasers. In view of these circumstances, I do not want to interfere in the impugned order. 2 The petition stands dismissed. J. H. BHATIA, J