Single Bemh IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No.§&9‘1 OF 2009 ($3.) :— gffgéndra SingK Thakur S/o Shri PETITxoNER Virendra Singh Thakur, aged about 47 ars, Occupation— Service, posted as (U.D.T.,'posted at Balak Ashra, Pasowara (Madded) Block an Tahsil Bhopalpatnam, District Bijapur (C.G.) R/ o Pallibhata, Post Kedarpal, Tahsil— Jagdalpur, District Bastar (c. G.) VESUS R State of Chhattisgarh, through Secetary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2 he Commissioner, Tribal Welfare and Development, Raipur (C.G.). 3. Collector, District Collectorate, 6 Bijapur, District Bijapur (C.G.). 4g/‘The ecretary, Mata Rukhmani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tahsil 85 District Jagdalpur (C.G.). U ‘ v PI D TICLE 226 OF THE INDIA, 1950 ye m d w" OZUH2Hm K V r . ’F ’ /“ , Formal Party S WRIT ETITON UNER AR CONSTITUTION OF Gowri 4‘ 2007 (1‘) BLJ 265 H§GH WR‘T CGziJRT PETET'GN GFICHHATTIéGaRH i3} NQ 5294 OF : BILA59UR‘ 2599 §/ {Writ petitim under Articie 226 of the Censtitutian of india} Séngie Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihota’i, J. Present :- Shri Amiya Kant Tiwari, counsei for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Advocate Genera: for the State. GRDER ORAL {Passe on this €6 day o? Segtember, 2993} d With the consent of iearned counsei appearing fer the parks, the petition 3s heard finaHy. Learned counsei appearing fer the petitiener submits that ihe‘ insiani peiition is squareiy covered by the decision of this Court fendered in Smt-A. Laii v. $tate of Chhattisgarh & Others‘ii ihus ihe petitioner may be permiiied to make a representation ie decide his case in the iight 0f efere-stated decision, subject to verincation esto whether the respondent No.4 institute is a Government aided school and the petitioner is a teacher within the sanctioned strength. Learned counsei appearing for the State submits that in the event. the petitioner makes a tepa'esentation, the same wiii be considered and decided, in aecordance with iaw, within a period of four weeks item the date of receipt oi the representation. in View of foregoing. according to the iearneo‘ counsel appeanng for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/— ’ Satish K. Agnihotri ’ Judge ?ETiTi0NER Upendre Singh Thakur Versus RESPONDENTS State of Shhattisgarh & Others