IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 8665 of 2008 Decided on: 9.12.2010 Joginder Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : None For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2 None for respondents No. 3 and 4. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No. 4 as Part Time Water Carrier. In view of the reply filed by respondents No. 1 and 2, petitioner has secured 15.5 marks and respondent No. 4 has secured 20.5 marks. The suitability of the petitioner and respondent No. 4 has been adjudged by the duly constituted Selection Committee. Consequently, this Court will not sit in appeal over the recommendations made by the Selection Committee. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in the present petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge December 9, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?