IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7773 of 2011 RAJESH PANDEY & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 01.04.2011 Petitioner No. 1 being elder brother of the husband, petitioner No. 2 being the wife of petitioner No. 1 and petitioner No. 3 being the mediator of the marriage are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304(B)/201/34 of the I.P.C. The marriage was performed in 2004 and the victim died in 2008. There is accusation of demand of dowry and torture. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that informant has subsequently retracted from his initial version. It is further submitted that anticipatory bail of father-in-law has been rejected with observation to consider regular bail on the basis of compromise when the father-in-law was granted regular bail by the learned Court below on the basis of compromise. Considering the fact that there is general accusation against petitioner Nos. 1 and 2, informant has retracted from his initial version and no allegation with regard to demand of dowry and torture against petitioner No. 3, let the petitioners namely 1. Rajesh Pandey 2. 2 Suthar Devi 3. Jamuna Pandey, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 96 of 2008. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)