IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13645 of 2004 MAHESH PRASAD SINGH son of Late Tuka Singh, Resident of Rudraksha, Shankarpuri, Chitranjan Path, Town and District-Lakhisarai …….. …….Petitioner Versus 1.The T.M.Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, through its registrar 2.The Vice Chancellor, T.M.Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 3.The Registrar, T.M.Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 4.The Finance Officer, T.M.Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 5.The Principal, K.S.S.College, Lakhisarai 6.The State of Bihar through the Commissioner- Cum-Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna 7.The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Deptt. of Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 8.The Director, Deptt. of Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna ……. ……Respondents ----------- 13. 17.1.2011. Heard Mr.Purushottam Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Ashok Kumar Keshari, learned counsel for T.M.Bhagalpur, University, Bhagalpur as well as learned counsel for the State. Mr.Keshari, learned counsel for T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, while referring to annexure-D to 5th counter affidavit particularly the order contained in Memo No.24661-64 dated 14.2.2009, submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. However, Mr. Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner, in relation to calculation, raised some dispute. The court is of the opinion that such dispute cannot be decided by this court and there 2 is no need to further keep the matter pending. The writ petition thus stands disposed of. However, if the petitioner feels that his grievance has not correctly been redressed, he will be at liberty to file a representation before respondent no.2 i.e. the Vice Chancellor, T.M.Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. If such representation is filed, it is expected that the same will be disposed of in accordance with law without any delay. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)