IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) No. 8N; /2009. / PETITIONER: Ramesh Kumar Tiwan', son of Shri Nathu Prasad Tiwari, aged abouf 54 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, posted at Govt. Middle School, Sukhrikala, Block Kartala, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. versus / Respondents. 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through, The Secretary Tribal Welfare Department Ministry D.K.S.Bhawa.n, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. // 2. Commissioner, Schedule Tribe and Schedule Caste Development, /. Chhattisgarh, Raipur. 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. /7 4. Block Education Officer, Block Kartala, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA i PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER(S): flf J’ W$H CEURT @F QHHATTESGH A? BELASPUR {Hewm Mi “jugtice ?{i%§nkea' mwaka?) Wrii‘ PeEitian (S) No. 3318 sf 2W3 Ramesh Kumar Tiwari. ?ET§T30NER VERSUS RES?0NDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and others. Shri K.S.. Pawar counsei for the petitioner. Shri Yaswant Singh Thakur Dy. AG for respondents/State. WRIT PETiTlON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTETUTIQN OF INDIA ‘ ORDER (13.07.2e09) finaHy. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the matter is heard By way of this petition the petitioner is seeking reguiar pay scale on the post of Assistant Teacher. Counsei for the petitioner submits that number of identical petitions have been decided by this Court and the issue involved is a concluded one. He has also referred to one of the orders in WP. (S) No. 813/2007 (Ram Kumar Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh) in which regular pay scale ‘ was granted from the date of initial appointment. Counsei for the respondents/State submits that in the light of the judgment of this Court the petitioner may make a representation to the authorities concerned and the same would be decided after scrutinizing the factuai and iegai position. Thus it is directed that if the petitioner makes a representation to the authorities concerned within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same shalt be decided within a futther period of one month from the date of its receipt. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- Pritinker Biwaker ’ Judge