IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1. Civil Revision No. 4986 of 2004 Date of Decision: August 27, 2009 Union of India and another ......... Petitioners versus Rattan Singh and another .......... Respondents 2. Civil Revision No. 4987 of 2004 Union of India and another ......... Petitioners versus Rattan Singh and another .......... Respondents Present:- Shri Anil Rathee, Advocate for the petitioners. Sh. S.D. Bansal, Advocate and Sh. Ashish Bansal, Advocate for the respondents. HEMANT GUPTA, J. This order shall dispose of Civil Revision Nos. 4986 and 4987 of 2004 directed against the order dated 3.4.2004 whereby the objections filed by the judgment debtor were dismissed and it was ordered to realise the decretal amount after attaching the property of the judgment debtor. One of the objections raised by the judgment debtor was that Memo of Costs has not been filed by the decree holder which alone will determine the amount of enhancement claimed and allowed by the High Court in appeal. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that in view of the judgment in Gurpreet Singh vs. Union of India, (2006) 8 SCC 457, the method of calculation of amount of compensation would require redetermination. Therefore, the matter should be remitted back to the learned Executing Court to re-determine the amount of compensation, if any, payable by the judgment debtor. However, it is conceded that the objection regarding Memo of Costs is only for determining the amount of costs which can be gone into by the learned Executing Court while determining the amount due to the decree holder. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection for remitting the matter back to the learned Executing Court for re-determining the amount of compensation. Consequently, order dated 3.4.2004 passed by the learned Executing Court is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the Executing Court for re-determination of the amount of compensation, if any, payable to the decree-holder. The parties through their learned counsel are directed to appear before the learned Executing Court on 12.10.2009 for further proceedings in accordance with law. August 27, 2009 ( HEMANT GUPTA ) ks JUDGE