1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.60 OF 2009 Shaikh Manik Kasam Bhai & ors. ... PETITIONERS VERSUS Shaikh Nawab s/o Mir Saheb & ors. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri S.S. Kazi, Advocate for the petitioners Shri G.D. Shaikh, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 & 4 Shri M.B.W.. Khan, Advocate for respondent No.5 ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 15th November, 2010 PER COURT : 1. Heard. The findings of learned Presiding Officer, Maharashtra Wakf Tribunal, Aurangabad, dated 18.2.2009 while dismissing the petition/suit, concerning Issue Nos.7 and 10 are questioned in the Civil Revision Application. On hearing the learned counsel and perusal of the order, I find that the findings to Issue Nos.7 and 10 by the learned Presiding Officer was based on the factual matrix and there being termination of the appointment of managing committee which was for one year, having been so cancelled by order dated 8.9.2006 by the defendant No.15, the learned Presiding Officer found that the affairs of the Trust/ Wakf was not managed by the respondent Nos.4 to 14. This finding being of the fact and based on record, 2 does not call for any interference. 2. Mr. Kazi, during the course of his submissions, informed that, subsequent to the order of cancellation dated 8.9.2006, on an application and proper enquiry before the concerned officer, the defendant Nos.4 to 14 of the said proceedings are continued as managing committee members of the said Wakf and renewal of such committee is granted by the Chief Executive Officer, Wakf Board, Aurangabad. Though this statement does not find place in the present proceedings, however, I have no reason to discard the same. In the light of this position, if the original defendant Nos.4 to 14 are by virtue of subsequent change of circumstances are managing the affairs, it is between the parties litigating to traverse to that controversy. For the present, the findings under challenge of the learned Presiding Officer of the Wakf Tribunal does not call for any interference. Consequently, Civil Revision Application dismissed. No costs. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/cra6009