IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.2218 of 1982 (O&M) Decided on : 26.08.2009 Smt. Mohinder Kaur ... Appellant versus Giani Inder Singh & others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Piyush Kan Jain, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Amit Rawal, Advocate for respondent No.4. Mr. Deepak Verma, Advocate. **** 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) In this appeal after arguing for some time, learned counsel for the parties have agreed that this matter can be compromised. On behalf of the appellant, her husband is present in Court and on behalf of the respondents, respondent No.2 – Pritpal Singh is present in Court. On instructions from their clients, learned counsel are agreed that appellant would pay an amount of Rs.2,20,000/- to the respondents and the respondents would then execute the sale deed in favour of the appellant- plaintiff. Since there is an agreement between the parties on this account, I pass a decree of specific performance in favour of the appellant and against the respondents for sale of the RSA No.2218 of 1982 (O&M) -2- property in dispute for a further consideration of Rs.2,20,000/-. It is further directed that the appellant would be at liberty to deposit the share of the respondents/legal representatives in their respective bank accounts, the details of which would be provided by the respondent No.2-Pritpal Singh. In case any person's account is not provided then the share of that person would be deposited by the appellant before the Executing Court. The appellant undertakes to file appropriate execution application within a period of one month after receipt of certified copy of this order under notice to the respondent No.2 who undertakes to appear on the date indicated in the notice and furnish the details of the bank accounts mentioned above. However, if the respondent No.2 does not appear before the Executing Court, the appellant would be at liberty to deposit the entire sale amount in the Court and get the sale deed registered through Court. In case the appellant does not file any execution application within 30 days as aforesaid, this appeal would be deemed to have been dismissed. Consequently this appeal is disposed of. August 26, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE