IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8169 of 2011 NAVEEN YADAV @ NAVIN YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 23.05.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in a case registered under Sections 302, 541, 323, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the I.P.C.and Section 27 of the Arms Act. In the F.I.R. the accused was named as assailant. During investigation, the accusation was found false and final form was submitted since the petitioner was found in some district on alleged date of occurrence but differing with the final form, cognizance has been taken in the matter. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the State that the petitioner has criminal antecedent. It is submitted that both sides of families are on litigating terms in which the petitioner’s brother has also been killed, resulting into false implication of the petitioner. 2 Considering the fact that accusation was found false during investigation, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. Naugachia in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No.222 of 2010. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)