^65-f00 Petitioner ResRondents h'JGHCOURT OrCHHATTiSGARH; BiLASPUR Wrat P^titi^n ?'^ NQ-.^§I rtf 2(M17 L-.L. KainaKar, son or iiKararT. KainaKar. agea ahf^l sf R4 \/par<£ f?ifsr,=ir{ .^> 'rkpnntpnrfpn-i- j'nciussnsf i fSiHiHQ inscitULS. CSHSHSL UiSinct Dantewada (CG) residsnt of I.T.I. Government Q! isn'^r Rh?sn<ii H^r't^^.'^r's P??c;t?;r fCtr^\ .^.^, .•.v^W^,^, i^-^^l^i! -^^•^^. Versus 1) State of Chnattissarh, thrcuoh the Secretap/, Deoartment ofTechnlca! Educetlon. Man Power. a--,~^-i^^ —i^-;^,.../^./-.^ ;'?itAi ;lie2iC:y; r\ciipUi ^•^''•^^ 2) State of Chhattisflam, tnrough tne Secretarv, Ds'psrtment of ST. SC. OBC CHss anct Minorltv Wsifara, Mantraisy, RsipUr (CG). 3) The Commissioner, Adiwasi Viios, Raipur (CGj. 4) The Director, inciustnal Train!ng, Eiyron Bazar, Rainur iC.GY 5) The Accountsnt Generai, Raipur (CG). (Writ Petitio" under Articie 22S/227 of the Constitution 0? india) Pres^nt Snri P,l< Tu^slsn- Qcunssi forthe Detltioner c;^;-. ^ p o ph^H"; Hv r^m/i- Ari^i^A^T'^ fri-fh^ ??^t^; iVi.i~'.0. ^^ ;etL?s..;. L^y. ^UVi.. r-iWLJ^i^LE; iUi Lf ;i; Ot.;3;.i;. ynr; A)ay DaraiK, Aavccaie appears on oensiT or &nri &.i\. oenwai aianaina uounsei tcr union or inaia. {Passed on 6"' day of fsay, 2008) With consenrof iearned counsei appearing for the parties, the matter is heard rinaiiv. • i tiis case oenains to anevance 01 non-arant OT retirai aues. tf This.Court. !n ihe matter of W.P.No.4642/2004 (Baiinath Mandal Vs. The State of Ghnattisgarh & others) and other connecied maters, directed the Committee to consicier the matter of retriai dues as the disputed question of facts were invoived. The Commiitee was consiitutea by tne State Government, pursuant to the orser ciated 19-05-2006 Dassed in W.P.N0.1961/2005 iSmt. Keia Bai r;aJU 2.- Chandrakar Vs. State Government of Cnhattisaarh and othersi, and order oatea 13-3-2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh ana oihers Vs. Baijnath ivianda! and another). .Thus, this petitnn is squareiy covered oy the iudament a"d order dated 31" Januan/. 2005' oassed in W.PNo. 4642/2004 [Ba!ina:n iviandal (supraj ) as suDminea oy learneo counsei appeanng TOr ihe pames. 2) I his peSrtion is accoraingiy ciisposed OT in the same terms i.e., tne oif'ce of the Advocate Generai is ciirected to send the case to the Commtiee, within a Deriod ot lo asvs trom tne QSTS OT receiDT OT a copy or inis oraer. ineraaKer. ihe Committee shail issue noiice to the petitioner and the ofrieers concemed. witnin a further period of 15 days. The Committee shaH consioer and pass order, in accordance witri lavi;. aner aTTordino proper opponunit'/ o? neanna 10 tne Detitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may fhe adaitionai documerts, if necessar^. ine eniire exereise, inciuatng payment OT ret<rai aues, IT any, 10 ine petitioner, be completed within a Deriod offour morans from the aate of rsceip! of a copy OT this oroer. 3) The petitioner shali suppiy one compiete ses of the petition to the Ststs counsei as weli as to She counsel for Unlon of india for transierring the same to the CommiEee. —-—-———.-. -—- Sd/- Sarish K. Agnihotri Judge