1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 5866/2009 Surjeet Singh vs. State of Rajasthan Dated : 06.08.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. Biri Singh Sinsinwar, for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Poonia, Public Prosecutor for the State. This order governs the disposal of bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. by Mr. Biri Singh Sinsinwar Advocate on behalf of the applicant Surjeet Singh pertaining to F.I.R. No. 50/2007 of Police Station Tijara, District Alwar in the offence under Section 420, 467 and 120-B of IPC. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and perused the relevant material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has canvassed that the petitioner is Power of Attorney holder and he is alleged to have executed a sale-deed in favour of Smt. Sahuni and Smt. Rahison. This Power of Attorney was given to him by Jeevan who is said to be Khatedar of the disputed land. The petitioner has committed no offence and he was not aware of the fact as to whether Jeevan was the khatedar of the disputed land or not. The petitioner has been falsely implicated, as such, he may be granted indulgence of bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail petition on the ground that the disputed land never belonged to Jeevan as he was not the khatedar of that land as per the Revenue Record. Jeevan in connivance with the petitioner and Patwari obtained a forged copy of Jamabandi, on the basis of which, the petitioner executed 2 sale-deed in favour of the aforesaid two ladies. Thus, he has committed an offence u/s 420, 467 and 120-B of IPC, hence, the bail petition should be dismissed. 5. Having considered the submissions made at the bar and scanned the relevant material on record, I without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, at this stage, do not deem it just and proper to grant any bail to the petitioner which deserves to be dismissed. 6. In the result, the bail petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the accused-petitioner stands dismissed. (MAHESH BHAGWATI)J. Mak/- 9