1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.425 OF 2011. IN WRIT PETITION NO.3829 OF 2010 (P) ( M/s J.K. Steel Corporation Vs. Onkar Gulabrao Khodke and another) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE: DECEMBER 1, 2011. The learned Single Judge has already admitted petition filed by the appellant and on 20.06.2011 directed appellant to deposit the amount and kept the question of withdrawal open for consideration at the time at the time of final hearing of the matter. The appellant then sought review of that order contending that it is not in a position to deposit the amount and its sister concern has to recover an amount of Rs.4,66,903/- from Respondent No.1 and accordingly that sister concern has obtained the decree from Civil Court against respondent No.1. This aspect is also considered by the learned Single Judge. Decree obtained by sister concern is held not relevant. The learned Single Judge has by impugned order refused to accept request of the appellant to offer Bank Guarantee instead of deposit. We do not see any jurisdictional error or 2 perversity in the order of the learned Single Judge. LPA is, therefore, rejected. No costs. Shri Shrivastava, Advocate pointed out that the present appeal was filed belatedly and hence CAZ No. 643/2011 was filed for condoning six days delay. The said delay was condoned. Then this Court has continued the interim order which protected the appellants. He seeks continuation of interim protection for a further period of six months. Learned AGP is opposing the request. However, in the interest of justice, we continue that interim protection for a further period of six weeks from today and the same shall cease to operate automatically thereafter. JUDGE JUDGE NSN