1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.06.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 7160 of 2011 K.M.Hameed ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State Represented by:: The Inspector of Police Aaralvanimozhi Police Station,Kanyakumari District 2.The Superintendent of Police Kanyakumari District,Nagercoil ... Respondents PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondents particularly the first respondent to give adequate police protection for his life and limb and also to the properties of Sri Fathima Educational Trust possessed by the petitioner on the basis of his representation, dated 30.05.2011. For Petitioner : Mr. B.Jeyakumar For Respondents : Mr.P.Kannithevan, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R This Petition has been filed to direct the respondents particularly the first respondent to give adequate police protection for his life and limb and also to the properties of Sri Fathima Educational Trust possessed by the petitioner on the basis of his representation, dated 30.05.2011. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner filed a suit in O.S.No. 61 of 2011 before the Sub-Court, Nagercoil and also obtained injunction in I.A.No. 117 of 2011 restraining the respondents mentioned in the suit from preventing the Educational Institution and the Colleges run by the petitioner. 3. Though Ad-interim injunction was granted, the petitioner was not able to enjoy the properties and the defendants / respondents in the suit with the help of others caused interference in the enjoyment of the properties and they are also threatening to murder the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner gave a representation, on 01.06.2011 to the second respondent, but no action has been taken. Hence, this Petition is filed. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the jurisdiction is not stated clearly in the complaint given by the petitioner. 5. According to me, the complaint was sent to the Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil and having regard to the allegations made in the complaint, it is the responsibility of the second respondent to conduct enquiry and take action against the persons, if any cognizable offence is made out. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 6. Hence, the respondents are directed to conduct enquiry and to take appropriate action against the persons mentioned in the complaint, if any cognizable offence is made out, on the complaint given by the petitioner, dated 01.06.2011. 7. With the above said direction, this Petition is disposed of. SD ASST REGISTRAR ( CO ) /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASST REGISTRAR vsg To 1. The Inspector of Police Aaralvanimozhi Police Station Kanyakumari District 2. The Superintendent of Police Kanyakumari District Nagercoil 3. The Addl. Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 1CC TO MR. B. JEYAKUMAR, ADVOCATE, SR>: 19550: DM::2011:JUNE:24:: Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 7160 of 2011 21.06.2011 2P:5C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/