r.\a'3 C , 6 ' * ..!.. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAITISGARH AT BIIASPUR WRIT PETITXON No./JS^ / 2005 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS '^ '^ S'v^''' ^l- ^ \0 v\'w^: x-^ Bhagwan Das Ukey,S/o Shri Jago Rao, Aged about 58 years, Ukey C.B. Sale Tax Officer, Circle-1, R/o. Jawahar Nagar, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.). VERSUS rf State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary Commercial ••Tax Department, D.K.S. Bhawan 'Baipur (C.G.). .••'^^.••**~ .^^-^ ..••;, ^f' ^^, ^ / 2- Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department, Raipur (C.G.). .^y^w s-''~^' ..-••"/'-/ / ^y. "^/ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OP THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. L...- /' ^R^Ri^SKa(^W!^^^^^-^-p XI-HC-22 sn^r^iT fNTsn^r *Ki+ tiRd 3^ "'41<1|C(<<, ®fl)«'16,(e|0|tf^< ITHCfTshHlcn^.^.e...i.i..s^. sn^rgRfiwB^a' ^rafepfr-r wrcffif fecit rfSRzre ^ari^iTsn^r 29.3.200S Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Shri AKhil Agrawal, Pa4el Heard. The petltioner hfls fflc<(l respondent No. 2 for disposgp the petitioner vide Annexure Rroin bare perusal of[ appears that fhe appeal was Axinexure P- 2, is fhc docuntei was issued to fhe petitioj(icr 19.11.2003. Leamed coiinsel for fhle befdrc submits fhe petifioner appearcd adjoumed. He furfher flie subsequent date, but th| far. He also submits that itk, a representation dated 7.2.{ ^ounscl for the petitioner. Lawyer ior tfae State/respondents. this writ petition for a direction to ^l ofthe departmental appeal, filed by p-1. Annexure P-1 (memo of appea^, it ^ent to the department on 19.11.1999. (eut which goes to show fhat a notice for hcaring of fhe appeal on petitioner subinits fhat on this date fhe aufhoitty aad fhc aiatter was that fhe hearing was concluded on appeal has not been disposed of so |he said situation, the petittoacr inade i005 (Annexiire P- 3) but evcn aaais 86 i!8 XI-HC-22 s^^iraiWT, aTfly'i<°, icici!<i^ ^lfepf^ llDRff ff fecA dSRSR ^ail^iTsn^i an^T^r fN^sn^T gii(N;flf?d 3n^r®Riren:Hf?<T - T_- opposed by conceraed expressed ppealofthe suna^umar