:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CONTEMPT PETITIOIN NO. 34 OF 200 CONTEMPT PETITIOIN NO. 34 OF 200 CONTEMPT PETITIOIN NO. 34 OF 2006 -------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders -------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar for the petitioner. Mr. A.C. Damle, for Respondent No.1. Mr. A.R. Patil, A.G.P for Respondent No.2. CORAM : A. M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 16, 2006 P.C. . Heard counsel for the parties. In my opinion, the appropriate course for the petitioner is to take recourse to remedy for cancellation of agency on the ground asserted in the present petition. The allegations in the present petition, in my opinion, do not warrant initiation :2: of contempt action. In view of these observations, the counsel for the petitioner submits that this petitioner be liberty to withdraw the petition with permission to take recourse to appropriate remedy as may be advised. Hence, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. All questions are kept open. (A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.]