IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15688 of 2011 RITLAL DAS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner is of taking Rs. 1,00,000/- for getting government employment. Subsequently the petitioner brought the complainant to Bangalore and get him employed in travel agency. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the accusation was found false and on protest cognizance has been taken in the matter. Moreover, the petitioner at earlier point of time lodged a case for theft against the complainant. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on 2 bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no.653(C) of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Jamui, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)