IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.10179 of 2011 BETWEEN P.Nageswara Rao. ... PETITIONER AND The District Co-operative Oﬃcer, Sahakara Bhavan, Buraanpuram, Khammam and three others. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. CH. SATISH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERATION GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Cooperation and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. 2. The only grievance ventilated in the writ petition is inaction of the respondents in considering petitioner’s representation dated 10.02.2011 and 01.04.2011 and seeking consequential direction to the respondents to consider the said representations and pass appropriate orders. While the writ petition is pending, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record the orders passed by the District Cooperative Oﬃcer, Khammam in Rc.No.580/2006-B dated 28.04.2011, which are issued in consideration of petitioner’s representations dated 10.02.2011 and 01.04.2011, which are referred in the writ petition as well. 3. The aforesaid proceedings of the District Cooperative Oﬃcer has eﬀectively considered and disposed of petitioner’s representations. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the aforesaid proceedings, nothing further survives for consideration in the writ petition and no further orders need be passed. In view of the above, the writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J December 9, 2011 DSK