IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2010 / 8TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 5525 of 2010(M) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.C.MATHEWS, S/O. M.V.CHERIAN, AGED 45 YEARS, LAW OFFICER, KERALA STATE CO-OP. AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LIMITED (KSCARD), REGIONAL OFFICE, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, STATUE JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 4. SMT.S.MOHANA KUMARI, DEPUTY MANAGER, KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LIMITED (KSCARD), REGIONAL OFFICE, KOZHIKODE. ADV. SRI.M.RAJAGOPLAN NAIR,SC,K.S.CO.OP.AGRL FOR R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. ANTONY DOMINIC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX Ext.P1. True copy of the Feeder Category Rules. Ext.P2. True copy of the proceedings No.E/FRV/2009-10 of the Managing Director. Ext.P3. True copy of the representation of the petitioner. // true copy// P.A to Judge. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.5525 OF 2010 (M) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T When the case came up for orders today, learned counsel for the petitioner confined his prayer for a direction requiring the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P3 representation filed by him impugning the promotion of the 4th respondent to the post of Deputy Manager, 2. I heard the counsel appearing for the respondents also. In the nature of the limited relief that is sought for, without expressing anything on merits, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P3. This shall be done with notice to the petitioner and 4th respondent. Orders shall be passed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :