IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36876 of 2011 Kanhaiya Mahto @ Kanhaiya Kumar, Son of Bochu Mahto, Resident of Village-Tartar, P.S.-Barahiya, District-Lakhisarai. …..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate. For the State : APP. ---------------------------------- 02/ 09.11.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code against Shambhu Singh @ Bhutta and two unknown. The informant was returning after performing last riots. In the way he and others were intercepted and robbers snatched the gold chain of the informant. The villagers told that the offence was being committed by Shambhu Singh @ Bhutta of Village Barahiya. Submission is that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report, has not been put on Test Identification Parade as yet and nothing has been recovered. Except confessional statement of Shambhu Singh @ Bhutta the petitioner’s complicity has not been found. The petitioner is a man of fair antecedent. 2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/court concerned, Lakihsarai in connection with Barahiya P.S. Case No. 62 of 2011. kksinha/- (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)