IIffl WWT OF CHH. i.ag 2nnT Petitioner Qf jenTs 5mt. Chemia'in Bai Wife of Shri Anjor Singh, 60 year-s, Resident of Jevraqoon^ Post Araud 0-itar), hsll and Dist"IC1 C>hamtari (C.e.'i state of Chhuttisgarii, TTirough The Secretary, Wuter iesources &epartment, D.K.5. ihowan, Raipur (C.6.), Tn :xecutive Engineer, Wa1 Manaqement biyision Rudri.. &istrict Dhamtari Tahsi! i'C.6.1 Th® Sub &ivi3iona! Officer, Mahanadi Jalashaya Pariyojna, sub &ivision No. 1 ©angrel, Tahsil and &istrict Dhamtari (c.e.) h Hon'b! ^l-,!^. SA^ TPI®.wr. Tice OBTI ff^^At. JIS?f ^. RII! Pressnt; Mr. P.P. Sahu, Advocate for the petitionsr". Mr. Arvind Dubey, Pane! L<a»*ye"fo" the State/responderrl •faased on this 19th C>sy of AAarch, 2007) 1. By this petition, counsel appeanng fop the petitioner- submits * the petftioner- on 10.01.1979 ® permanent ©angmcnand the t> • . petitioner, who has worked for more than 15 years as ©CTigmon.He a relief that the petitiona" being permanent gangman be retired ot the age of 62'veors in accordunce with the'Chhattisgarh Sh«kiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhiniyam, 1967 (for short the Act, 1967 ) read »i;ith Fundamental Ru'e (for short F.R. )56. <•' 2. According to counsel for the petltioner, the petitionep attained the stotus of permanent employee, as defined under Rule 2(e) of the Chhattisgarh (Workcharged and Contingeney Poid Eniployees} Rules, 1979 (for short the Ru!es, 1979 ), franed under Article 309 of the Constltution of India. After hwinq attaihed the statua of the permanent emptoyee the petitlone" iii'ould rettre on attainting the aae < s2 years on super<mnuation under the provisions of the Act, 1967. 3. Leurtied counsel oppearing for the petitioner wouid submit that tiie of the petitioner is squarely covered by the decision of this Court on 4th Januery, 2007 in W.P. No. 1(B/2005 (Sovind Vs. State of Chhutttsgarh & othera) and other connected motters. 4. Learned counse! ocpearinq for the respondents/Stote does not disoute ths made by iearned counsel for the petitioner. 5. Accot'dingly, t'ne petitioner, who is permanent gangman, is entitled to retire on uttainlng the age of 62 years i" accordance with the Act, 1967. ine petition is uccordingly oltowed. No order os to costs, 6. Consequently, I.A. No. 01, appi'ication for stcy/interim reSief, stand! 01 Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ;ybh<5sh