IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 7848 of 2004 Between: M/s BVM Engineering Technologies D.no.3-16-B-106, 5th Road, Shantinagar, Kakinada, a partnership firm, rep. by its Managing Partner, Gurram Venkataratnam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The south Central Railway rep. by its General Manager, Secunderabad. 2 Deputy Chief Electrical Engineer (Traction Distribution/ Construction)HQ, 4th Floor, Railway Nilayam, South Central Railways, Secunderabad. 3 Senior Divisional Electrical Engineer (Traction Distribution South Central Railways, Vijayawada. 4 Divisional Railway Manager, (Traction Distribution) South Central Railways, Vijayawada. 5 Senior Divisional Accounts Officer, South Central Railways, Vijayawada. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing proceedings No.G.148/6/HC/2003 Law, Dt 25-4-2003 by with holding an amount of Rs.4.39,403 lakhs of the petitioner herein without coducting any enquiry and without following the procedure unilaterally passed the impugned order contrary to the earlier directions of the Hon'ble Court in w.P.No.1862 of 2003 dt. 4-2-2003 and without passing final orders on the earlier proceedings dt 8.10.2002 issued by the 4th respondent herein is illegal and void and opposed to Art.14,19 and 21 of constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents not to withhold any amounts of petitioner herein without passing any final orders on the earlier proceedings dt 8.10.2002 issued by the respondents authorities and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MUMMANENI.SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: MR.GOURI SHANKAR SANGHI The Court, at the stage of admission, made the following : ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the final orders passed by the second respondent, no cause survives in this writ petition and the same has become infructuous. Recording the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _________________ A. GOPAL REDDY. J. 11th November, 2004 tsr. To 1 The General Manager, south Central Railway, Secunderabad. 2 Deputy Chief Electrical Engineer (Traction Distribution/ Construction)HQ, 4th Floor, Railway Nilayam, South Central Railways, Secunderabad. 3 Senior Divisional Electrical Engineer (Traction Distribution South Central Railways, Vijayawada. 4 Divisional Railway Manager, (Traction Distribution) South Central Railways, Vijayawada. 5 Senior Divisional Accounts Officer, South Central Railways, Vijayawada. 6. Two C.D. copies.