IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 6TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 25719 of 2011(L) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- 1. SHINTO ANTONY, KALIYADAN HOUSE, KORATTY P.O., EAST ANGADI, THRISSUR. 2. GEETHANJALI.A., SANKARALAYAM, VAZHAPPALLY P.O., CHANGANACHERRY, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SMT.MEDONA LOPEZ RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 673 635. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 673 635. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/09/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.25719/2011 L APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE EXAMINATION RESULTS OF 1ST PETITIONER DOWNLOADED FROM THE INTERNET SITE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT. P2: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. P3: COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF RS.265/- REMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. P4: COPY OF THE EXAMINATION RESULTS OF 2ND PETITIONER DOWNLOADED FROM THE INTERNET SITE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT. P5: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. P6: COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF RS.396/- REMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).25719/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 28th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of the failed subjects in the 8th semester B.Tech Examination vide Exts.P2 and P5 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs