IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fCHHATnSGARH) WRTT PETmON N0.5^50 /2006. PETITIONER: ,^2t- .-•' ^•y ^^./- ^^•^c^' .-•""^w^' -:-^-'^'-SS.A- A1**" 1**' .*** <?^'°"^..--'"' ^•"" Raj Kumar Jaiswal, S/o Punuram Jaiswal, aged about 42 years, residence of village and Post Thankhamaria, Tahsil Saja, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. VERS.US Respondents ^COMAf^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretaiy School Education Departnient Ministry D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director ofSchool Educadon OfGce(^?/ D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ,3. The District Education Officer, Beinetara, Through Block Developraent Educadon Officer, Saja, Durg, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI. PROHIBmON AND FOR THE OTHER SIMILAR WRIT OR WRITS. ORDER OR ORDERS. DIRECTION OR DIFSEeHONS. 1^rrHEHIGHCOURTOFJt^ATUREJB(t.ASPU&CKKArr^.^ -$4 XI-HC-22 3^''<<i«K'i<i,aiTn^<i6,RlcflU^i 311^1 Msi<t> .-^ *ii*«iig)*trei W(^-^?-3-8/d-6^ 200 fS|(>«A sn^rw R-ii+sn^r wgfer W V ^,'-' ^ a Barce 311^1 BWIWdfer ! '5-'7-* \ £.~i"^ Heard Shri O.P. Sahu, oounse Govt. Advocate for the State/responds The case of the petitioner is since 29-10-86 and as per the !nstruc) M.P. the Assistant Teaohers who .fixamination on t'neir own expenses increments and order of Government B.Ed. examination on his own cost effect is Annexure-P/5, but ths whereas, similarty situated persons under the orders of the Tribuna] and tl| Having heard tearned counse| and circumstances of the case, '.vithot case, the petitioner is allowed to mak| ofthis petition raising all his grievancj days from today and in turn, respondj the petitioner in the !ight of averment) in the representation a!so. tf respoi| similarly situated persons have b^ increments and the petitioner's cas^ increments on the basis of period of3 monthsfrom today, in acc( With the direction aforesaid, ttt Parties are entitled for certifie<|] pejtit hbve Governrhent's *i<<Ii'i<n-i ii*i<iTfftec3'<Rfwi< ^>5a1^T3t1^T for the petitioner and Shri Sumesh Baj'aj, jnts, on advance copy. |that he is working as Assistant Teacher |ons dated 24-12-98 issued by the State of have passed B.T.I., B.Ed. and M.Ed. Ifter 22-10-64 are entit'ed for hvo advance |s Annexure-P/1. The petitioner passed hls |n the year 1994 and a certificate to that |itioner has not been given the benefit been granted two advance increments lis Court vide Annexure-P/6. for the parties, having regard to the facts |t expressing any opinion of the merit of the ^ a detailed representation along with copy is to respondent No.3 within a period of 15 ent No.3 is direoted to examine the case of made by the petitioner in this petition and ident No.3 reaches to the conclusion' that en granted the beneflt of tv/o advance is also covered for grant of t*'Q ativance order, then to pass orders witiiin a >rdance with law. ie petition stands disposed of. oopy of this order. Sdi- : L.C. Sh^oo Judge (^y^)