IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-21889 of 2011 Date of Decision : July 21, 2011 Priti and another .... Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. S K. Biriwal, Advocate for Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied if respondent no.2 i.e. Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar is directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law on application dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P-5), made to him by petitioner no.1. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2 i.e. Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar to take appropriate action in accordance with law on application dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P-5), already stated to have been moved to him by petitioner no.1. July 21, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE