IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH JUNE 2011 / 18TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 4430 of 2011(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- PATTATHARI KUTTIRAMAN, AGED 85 YEARS, S/O. BAPPU, BUSINESS, RESIDING AT ASHOKA BHAVAN, ANJARAKANDY AMSOM, KAMETH DESOM, ODATHIL PEEDIKA, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.SREEJITH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE TALUK SURVEYOR, KANNUR TALUK OFFICE OF TALUK SURVEY, KANNUR-670706. 2. VILLAGE OFFICER, ANJARAKANDY, P.O. MAMBA, KAVINMOOLA-670611. 3. PUTHUKKUDI NARAYANAN, S/O. GOVINDAN, RESIDING AT ANJARAKANDY AMSOM, KAMATH DESOM, ODATHILPEEDIKA, P.O. MAMBA, KANNUR DIST-670611. GP SRI.M.H.HANIL KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).4430/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 8th day of June, 2011 JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a mistake in the Survey number, which happened to be incorporated in the judgment dated 21.3.2011 because of the typing mistake in the writ petition, which is stated as deeply regretted. It is stated that, by virtue of the said mistake, the Taluk Surveyor is not giving effect of the judgment referring to the wrong Survey number. 2. Considering the particular facts and circumstances, the judgment dated 21.3.2011 in this writ petition is recalled 'suo motu', and the writ petition is taken up for consideration afresh. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to file a proper writ petition. Permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as above. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, Judge mrcs