IN THE HIGH QQURLLOF CHHAT’I‘I$GARH BILASPUR Writ Petition No 697 012002 Petitioners 1. Satish Knmar Awasthi, S/o Parmeshwar Lal Awasthi, aged about 26 years, Occupation student (Agriculture} Plant Brsediag and Genetics R/o 39/515 Nav Durga Chowk, Basti, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (CG) 2. Magare Hareshwar Brijlal, S/o Bn'j Lal Hulaji Magare, aged 25 years, occupah'on student, M.Sc Final, Soil Science, R/o Hostel No.1, Room No.1, Indira Gandhi Krisin' Vishwavidhalaya, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (CG). 3. Rakes]: Kumar Godase, S/o Shri Sant Knmar, aged about 23 years, occupation student, M.Sc. (Agriculture) Final —Illrd Semester, R/o B48, Basant Corner, MIG Flats, Sector No.2 Avanh' Villar, Ravi Gram Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (CG). 4. Gamav Knmar Muldm, S/o Shri Shrimm Mulcim, aged about 26 years, occupation Student, NLSC. (Agri) Extension (Final‘Year), R/o B—28 Madhav Rao Sapre Nagar Birgaon, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur. 5. Pankaj Goyal, S/o Late P.P.Goyal, aged 26 years, occupation student, M.Sc.(Agn'culture) Final Year, R/o Near R.S.B. Towers, Bus Stand Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG) Respoimients 1. The State of Chhmtisgaxh, Through the Secxetaly, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S.’ Building, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur. The Chancellor of Universities, Raipur, T‘ahsil and District Raipur. Versus 3. lndira Gandhi Kn‘shi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, Through its Vice Chancellor at Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur. b: The DeanIColiege of Agriculture, Indiia Gandhi Kiishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur. (Writ Pet‘tion under Articles 226/ 227 ofthe Constitution of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shn‘ Vivek Ranjan ’l‘iwan‘, Adv0cate for ths petitioners. Shn' Alvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the mspondent No. 1. Shri S. S. Rajput. Advocate 1br the respondents No. 3 and 4. ORDER ( Passed on this 9th Day of Januaxy, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner seeks pennjssion of this Court to Withdrawn this petition on the ground that this petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 1, 3 and 4 have no objection. In view of the foregoing, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as having become infructnous. Intelim onier passed on 12.4.2002 stands discharged. Consequently, M(W)P No. 138/2002 is also dismissed. / PK Sdl- Thaw Satish K- WO . . m; . . Judge