^^^^^i^i,»^ 0 / ^^v Bssoas SHE»HONlai£.ia£H--^^«OZi[2.S.^l^^T».^X.AISLS«L«&2aJ MJS^£iTITION-M.6.!LJ^^-@.^-..../o3, PBTTTIONSR ^e^^" ...^^: ^<;^"^%o?"t** c^^- T<e'9'A -.-" ' ^ K>.. / Krlshri^ Kim^r S^hu gon of 13te Shri Sons&y Sahu aged / 22 yea^s^ resl d^i't o f DabKl-para Chantidih Bilagpur Tahsil. aiid oisfct. Bllaspur ( C.G.). VBKSUS HBSPONIM^TS "V 1 'k ^w c\«^ .^^•?^ ^ 1< Stateof Orihattlsgarh 'lhxwlgfa-i Chlef 'Secrebary^," G®era.lAdnini sb ration Deparfcm%it / D.K.S.Bhavsn Raipur ( C»G»)» 2, Dlrecto r o f Sducatlon Soheailed Tribe Developmmt D^>a rtm%t ^ D»K»S<» Bhav%i Rgipur (C.G.) 3<, .&ss=.t^%Tail^.sibrier S. T. Developmoat, Bilaspu r (G.G.5. l!SS^£SISSJ!Em&^S3.&!'£.^Si/?lZ.^_yi§ ^?iSTIIUT%N_0,£'_lNDlA.%R ISSU^CE O^ A a:)P.OT^£_Wffl.T__^WMTS.O£ySR*D DIRBCTION «3j HIGHCQURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITION N0.3585 OF 2003 Petitioner versus Respondents Krishna Kumar Sahu State ofChhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. Ram Kumar Tiwari, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 27U1 ofJuly, 2006) The father ofthe petitioner Shri Sonsay Sahu, while working as Accountant in the Department of Scheduled Tribes Welfare, Bilaspur died on 3-2-1997 in hamess leaving behind widow Smt. Ki-ishnabai and two sons Krishna Kumar and Purshottam. The petitioner, being one ofthe dependent legal heirs of the deceased, filed an application for compassionate appointment. The said application was considered and rejected on the ground that the petitioner's father had died prior to creation ofthe State of Chhattisgarh, i.e., 1-11-2000. Be that as it may, State of Chhattisgarh, by Circular dated 2-2-2006 has decided to consider all the applications of the 2-- w ^ dependent legal heirs ofthe deceased - employees, who died after 1-11- 1997. 2. In view of the decision of the State Govemment, this vvrit ^ petition is disposed ofwith liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents/State for consideration of his case for compassionate appointment and if such a representation is made, the State Government is directed to consider the case of the petitioner according to its own Circular dated 2-2-2006 and also in view of the order dated 20-12-2005 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 1322/2002 and other connected matters, on its own merit, in accordance with law. No order as to costs. Certified copy as per mles. Sd/- Satish K. AgnUiotri Judge