IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14396 of 2009 Dr. Jai Narayan Prasad, son of Late Raghu Nath Prasad, Resident of Village-Kumari Devi Chowk, Motihari, P.S. Town- Motihari, District-East Champaran. ………Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Secretary, Rural Development Department and Panchayati Raj, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director, Panchayati Raj, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, East Champaran (Motihari). 4. Zila Parishad, East Champaran through its Chairman. …….Respondents. For the petitioner :- Mr. Mithilesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 :- Mr. Shri Prakash Srivastava,Advocate. For the State :- Shri Sajal Kumar Sinha,Advocate, A/C to G.P.-17. ----------- 2. 03. 11. 2009. As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the date of birth as appearing in paragraph 3 of the writ application. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that upon his superannuation from the post of Doctor, petitioner has been paid a lump sum amount towards retiral dues. However, still now the authority has not been settled the entire retiral dues. Mr. Shri Prakash Srivastava appearing on Respondent Zila Parishad, submits that in case petitioner files a representation stating details of his unpaid claim, the same shall be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his 2 grievances with regard to unpaid claim, petitioner proposes to file a representation before Respondent No.3. In case, such representation is filed along with relevant documents in support of his claim as also certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks from today, Respondent No. 3 shall consider and dispose of the claim of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the admitted claim of the petitioner could be settled without delay with statutory interest. With the above observations/directions, the writ application stands disposed of. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)