IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46190 of 2008 CHANDRADEEP YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.12.2008 Heard Mr. Manish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. Some persons were captured by the police on information that they had assembled after having made preparation to commit dacoity. The petitioner was one of them. Nothing was found from the possession of any other accused but the petitioner was found possessing two bombs. The contention is that the petitioner is in custody for over 3 ½ years and that there is no report of recovery of any chemical substance which could be explosive material. Further contention is that even if assuming the same could be explosive material, there is no intent, as indicated in the relevant provisions of law and on facts it could not be said that the offence under the Penal Code could be attracted. The contention next is that some of the accused persons, from whom nothing was recovered, have been admitted to bail by the learned Sessions Judge himself, as appears from the rejection order itself. Let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Raxaul, East Champaran Motihari, in connection with Raxaul P.S. case no.55 of 2005. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )