IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 1712 of 2010 Date of decision:- 20.8.2010 Baj Singh ......petitioner vs. Avtar Singh and others ......respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. Sanjeev, Advocate for Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pavit Singh Mattewal, Advocate for respondent No. 5. HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the plaintiff-petitioner has pointed out that official witnesses have been summoned but the said witnesses have not produced the relevant record which led to number of opportunities to the petitioner to conclude his evidence. It has been pointed out that the plaintiff-petitioner has no intention to delay the suit and one opportunity may be given to the plaintiff- petitioner to lead the entire evidence. In view of the fact that the plaintiff has sought declaration in respect of use of electric motor tubewell connection, I deem it appropriate to grant one opportunity to lead the entire evidence to the date fixed by the trial Court subject to payment of Rs. 2,000/- as costs. However, it shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to summon the witnesses and to secure their presence in Court. In case of failure to deposit the cost so imposed or to secure the presence of the witnesses on the date fixed, plaintiff-petitioner will not be entitled to another opportunity to lead the evidence. Disposed of, in the above said terms. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 20.8.2010 preeti