IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 14864 of 2008 Between: P. Sunitha D/o. P. Chidambaram R/o.H.No.W-115, HMT Colony, Township Chintal, Qutubullapur, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Directorate General Central Reserve Police Force, Block No.1, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110003, India. 2 The Commandant, 99, Battalion RAF/CRPF, Hakimpet, R.R. District, Secunderabad-500078, A.P., India. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not fixing the pay as per the 4th, 5th pay commissions including emoluments to the petitioner thereby depriving the petitioner legitimate pay as illegal, in-justice, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to fix the pay as per 4th, 5th pay commissions eligibility of the petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: MRDADIRADHA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following ORDER: The petitioner retired from C.R.P.F. as Head Constable on 01.04.2007. Earlier to that, she held different ranks. Her grievance is that she was not extended the benefit of pay revision in pursuance of 4th and 5th pay commissions. She claims to have made several representations, the latest being the one on 08.03.2008 and complains that no action has been taken thereon. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The question as to whether the petitioner is entitled for the benefit of revised pay scales of 4th and 5th pay commissions needs to be examined by the respondents. In case the petitioner is not entitled for the said benefits, the reasons therefor need to be communicated to her. The representations cannot be kept pending indefinitely. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the first respondent to examine the representation, dated 08.03.2008, submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall enclose the copy of the representation made by her along with the copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt: 11.07.2008. Note: Issue c.c. in three days. kdl ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MSN}