IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR MONDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2009 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 Crl.MC.No. 3695 of 2009(D) -------------------------------------- (C.C. NO.73/2007 OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, NILAMBUR) ............... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1: ------------------------------------------ BIJU EAPPEN, S/O.EAPPEN VARGHESE MANNIL HOUSE, CHUNKATHARA P.O. POTHUKALLU, NILAMBUR. BY ADV. MR.K.MOHANAKANNAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA 2. ALICE GEORGE, D/O.GEORGE MULLANAMKUZHYIL HOUSE MAMPOYIL, CHUNKATHARA PO CHUNKATHARA DESOM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR. P.A. SALIM. R2 BY ADVS. MR. V.S. CHANDRASEKHAR, SMT. BEENA JOSEPH. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. M.Sasidharan Nambiar, J. -------------------------- Crl.M.C.No.3695 of 2009 -------------------------- ORDER Petitioner is the first accused and second respondent the defacto complainant in C.C.No.73/2007 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Nilambur. By Annexure-A1 judgment, accused 2 and 3 were acquitted and petitioner/first accused was convicted for the offence under Section 498A of Indian Penal Code and sentenced to simple imprisonment for five months and a fine of Rupees Five thousand. Challenging the conviction and sentence, Crl.A.No.57/2009 was filed before Sessions Court, Manjeri and it is pending. Meanwhile, entire matrimonial disputes between the petitioner and second respondent, his wife, the defacto complainant, were settled in respect of all the cases pending between them. Consequent to the settlement and in view of the agreement entered into by the petitioner and second respondent, to settle all the disputes, this petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the conviction and sentence now pending in Crl.A.No.57/2009. Annexure-A3 affidavit/ CRMC 3695/09 2 joint statement of the petitioner and second respondent was produced, which shows that there has been a complete settlement of all the matrimonial disputes. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, second respondent and learned Public Prosecutor were heard. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that statement of the second respondent, the defacto complainant was subsequently recorded and it shows that entire matrimonial disputes were amicably settled. 4. Annexure-A1 judgment of the learned Magistrate shows that petitioner was convicted for the offence under Section 498A of Indian Penal Code finding that petitioner treated second respondent with cruelty as provided under Section 498A of Indian Penal Code. Joint statement (Annexure-A3) filed by the petitioner and second respondent establishes that O.P.No.258/2007 was filed by the second respondent for realisation of money and gold ornaments from the petitioner and O.P. No.21/2007 was filed by the petitioner for restitution of conjugal rights and M.C.No.693/2006 was filed by the second respondent for her maintenance as well as for CRMC 3695/09 3 the maintenance of the child and though maintenance was awarded by Family Court, Malappuram, it was challenged before this Court in R.P.(FC)No.425/2007. It is also clear that when these disputes were pending, there was intervention by mediators and entire matrimonial disputes were amicably settled and consequent to the settlement, second respondent has no subsisting grievance against the petitioner. It is, in such circumstances, quashing of the conviction and sentence has been sought for. 5. An offence under Section 498A of Indian Penal Code is not a compoundable offence. In such circumstances, learned Sessions Judge cannot be directed to permit the parties to compound the offence in Crl.A.No.57/2009. In the light of the settlement arrived at between the parties, as held by the Apex Court in B.S.Joshi v. State of Haryana ((2003) 4 SCC 675), it is not in the interest of justice to continue the prosecution. Therefore, though the Sessions Judge cannot set aside the conviction based on the settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court, exercising the extraordinary inherent power under Section 482 of CRMC 3695/09 4 Code of Criminal Procedure, could, definitely, set aside the conviction and quash the proceedings, when due to the settlement of all the matrimonial disputes, conviction passed by the learned Magistrate under Annexure-A1, is necessarily to be interfered with, to secure justice, exercising the powers under Section 482 of Code of criminal Procedure. The petition is allowed. The conviction and sentence passed by Judicial First Class Magistrate, Nilambur in C.C.No.73/2007 is set aside and Crl.A.No. 57/2009 pending before Sessions Court, Manjeri as well as C.C.No.73/2007 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Nilambur are also quashed. 21st December, 2009 (M.Sasidharan Nambiar, Judge) tkv