1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3573/2011[ DRAMESHCHANDRA BAHETI ..VS.. MRS SARALA AGRAWAL AND WRIT PETITION NO.3574/2011[RAMESHCHANDRA BAHETI ..VS.. MRS. KANTA LILADHAR RATHI & ORS] AND WRIT PETITION NO.3575/2011 RAMECHCHANDRA BAHETI ..VS.. LILADHAR RATHI AND ORS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.C.Dharmadhikari, advocate for petitioner Shri N.W. Sambre, G.P. For repsondent no.1 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & P.B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 05, 2011. We were not inclined to entertain this writ petition, wherein merely a notice was issued to the petitioner by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum at Akola, as the petition was premature. Since it was submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum at Akola does not entertain any preliminary objection and decides the matter on merits along with the preliminary objection, we had issued notice only to the respondent no.4 District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum at Akola through its President. Shri N.W.Sambre, the learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent no.4 makes a statement, on instructions from the respondent no.4, that earlier when such preliminary objections were raised before 2 the Forum at Akola, they were dealt with in accordance with law and in case the petitioner raises an objection to the tenability of the complaint filed before the Forum, the same would also be decided on merits without insisting that the petitioner/original opponent should file a written statement/ reply to the complaint on merits. However, it is submitted on behalf of the respondent no.4 that the petitioner and the like persons should not take advantage of this situation with a view to delay and protract the proceedings before the Forum at Akola. Shri Dharmadhikari, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed in view of the statement made on behalf of the respondent no.4. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would file a preliminary objection before the Forum at Akola at the earliest within a period of 15 days. The respondent no.4 is free to decide the objection in accordance with law. With these observations the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE SMP