IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1469 of 2011 Between: Pinnapureddy Ram Reddy & others. … Petitioners And Pinnapureddy Matta Reddy & others … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri G. Simhadri This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1469 of 2011 ORDER:- This Civil Revision Petition arises out of order dated 21.03.2011 in I.A.No.30 of 2011 in I.A.No.181 of 2010 in O.S.No.89 of 2010 on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Huzurnagar. The petitioners are the plaintiffs in the suit filed for perpetual injunction. The petitioners filed I.A.No.181 of 2010 for temporary injunction. The respondents have resisted the said application inter alia on the plea that they are in possession of the property and that for proper adjudication of the disputes raised in the I.A., it is necessary to appoint an advocate commissioner. Accordingly, they filed I.A.No.30 of 2011 for this purpose. The Court below, by the impugned order, allowed the said application. A perusal of the impugned order shows that the Court below has given detailed reasons for appointing an advocate commissioner. In my opinion, the petitioners – plaintiffs, who are claiming injunction, would not suffer any prejudice, if an advocate commissioner is appointed to note down the boundaries of the subject land and whether any cart way is passing through the boundaries of the petition schedule. In fact, the true state of affairs can be ascertained in a case of this nature by the appointment of an advocate commissioner. Therefore, I do not find any reason to interfere with the order under revision. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 01.07.2011 ES