;%F^.,'"'':>9 'E: S?! Slt'.^l^ feu'i e^ '~\ . IN THE HOSTBLB HJGB COURT OF CBHATTISGARH JUDICATURB AT P.fS) No. 3A%6 /2t009 PETITIONER: ^ .^/^/ ^eyy ..<r-'A.-'' ^^M/ ^•1%^7 tt\^ tiS' -V ift-'./' .-••• ..'y >...•' ''<' -."-' •V RBSPONDBNTS: :- Jagnath Baghet S/o Shri Chakaram Baghel Aged about 37 years Ctocupatcon -Assistant Vetermary FieM Cffficer Veterinanf Hospital, Tongpal IKst- DcmSewada (C.G.) VERSUS i.siaie oj unnauisgarn Throuah, Secretaru . Departm-ent of Agriculture (Veterinary) Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, RaipurfC.G.) 2. Deputy Director Veterinarg Services Dist- Dantewada (C.G) ^— ^ WRJT PBTmONT UNDBR ARTXCLB 226/227 OP TBK CONSTITUTION OF ISfOXA -1-. T '-HC—78 3n^iqi!'f?;)R? ^aff 3H^T sa»*ji<¥> ^ *n* l!Sh*<!<»» '3^ "41<41<']<4, ®Tlly'](o,fsjdi'i-iy ^......U:..6..C.s.)..3?.s^ ^ a.n^r T^T (lj°if^<^) ^WisR ^rf^T 3?T^?T 'N'BLB J(. 'snn' "us' Ms. Deeoaii Pandey, cou Shri Sumesh Ba'ai, G.A. Grievai'ice of the petitior (Annexure p/ 1) the petitioner .1.7h Fieid 01'1'icer has been transfei Distt. Dantewada to Veternaiy date the oetitioner has not beer Learned couasel tbr representation was aiready m, response has been g'iven to tti^ shs may be oermitted to withdl file fresh representation to th that direction may be issued fc expeciiuouslv. Learned counsel for thd make a fresh representation t| decided within the time frame. <»ii<<lt?i<ft'f^w^. ^ fe^ <r^^x ^affipTsn^r isel for the cetitiiSner. for the State. er is that vide order dated 07.07.2008 vho is working as Veternar^' Assistant •red from Veteman- Kosoital Tongpai, Hospitai, Darbha, Distt. Bastar but till 1 reiievecl. the oetitioner submits that a ide ior relieving him but tiil date no said representation. She submits that -a\v the present petition with iiberty to e respondents. She however' submits ir decidine the representation so made State submits that iet the Detitioner 3 the resaondents and that wouid be is dismissed as withdrawn with the scted that if the petitioner niakes a 3; 15 days from the receipt of the copy Accordingly, the petitioii liberty as aforesaid. It is dirj representation within a period of this order, the same wouid Ise deicded by a speaking order within three weeks from the date of i|;s receipt. it wouid be the duty of the petitioner as well as the State counsei to aoprise the authorities regardine the order passed bv Utiis Court. Sd/- pritinker Di'waker Judge '«<'