IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51839 of 2007 YUNUS MIAN & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 05.05.2008 Heard. The informant alleged commitment of a dacoity and named a person as the alleged dacoit. Investigation pursuant to the information resulted in filing of a charge-sheet against two persons. That suggests, in course of investigation, the informant and others, who had been investigated, did not name anyone else as the alleged dacoit, except those two persons, who had been charge-sheeted. In course of trial, the members of the family of the informant named the petitioners also as alleged dacoits and accordingly, the Court has taken recourse to Section 319 of the Cr. P.C. as against these petitioners, who are neighbours of the informant. I think a case for grant of anticipatory bail has been made out. Let the petitioners, namely, Yunus Mian, Nasim Mian and Noor Hassan Mian, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks in the Court below, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Kaimur (Bhabua) in connection with S. Tr. No. 61/ 25 of 2005 (arising out of Chainpur P.S. Case No. 39 of 2004) subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. S.B.P. (Barin Ghosh, J.) 2