1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No.6220/2006 Shriram Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ..vs.. Asstt. Provident Fund Commissioner and another ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 5 th February, 2008 1. Heard Mr. Patil, Advocate for the petitioner, Ms. Tanna, Advocate for respondent No. 1 and Mr. Samarth, Advocate for respondent No. 2. 2. Ms. Tanna, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 makes statement that respondent No. 1 is recalling order dated 21.07.2005 passed under Section 14-B of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, which is annexed at Exh.-R1 along with affidavit- in-reply of respondent No. 1. 3. Learned counsel for the respective parties agree that order dated 31.07.2006 issued by respondent No.1, which is impugned in the present petition being consequential to the order dated 21.07.2005, the same 2 does not survive. 4. Ms. Tanna, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 further states that respondent No. 1 will take decision in this regard after hearing the petitioner and respondent No. 2 afresh. 5. In that view of the matter, nothing survives in the petition. The same is, therefore, disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. 6. Steno copy of the order, duly authenticated by the Sheristedar of this Court be given to the learned counsel for the parties. JUDGE kahale