IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45833 of 2008 JUGAL YADAV son of Balicharan Yadav, resident of village Pansari, P.S.Bhagwanganj,District Patna … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Shri Sudish Kumar For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta, APP ----------- 3. 3.2.2009 Heard. The petitioner was married to Parvati Devi, the deceased of the case. It is admitted that on the very day of the marriage the petitioner placed a demand for a motorcycle and not getting it did not take the lady with him to his house. On all a sudden, it is alleged, the cousin of the petitioner approached the family members of Parvati Devi with a message that her husband, i.e,, the present petitioner, was at a particular temple for the purpose to meet her and accordingly the lady is alleged to have gone with Tuntun Yadav up to the temple to meet the petitioner and others of his family. All persons who claimed accompanying the lady made statements in the case diary that after leaving the lady 2 at the temple they went away to one place or the other and on return they did not find either the accused or the deceased. Subsequently, her dead body was found in the field and the lady was strangulated to death. The contention is that it is extremely unreasonable and unacceptable that the petitioner having not taken his wife on the very day of Bidai could, on all a sudden, meet her with his family members. It is also contended that everyone accompanied the lady up to the temple and not farther from there nor does any one go in the light of not finding the lady to search her at the petitioner’s house and came up with the allegation of killing the lady. The contention further is that might be the parents and other family member of the lady or any one for any reason could have strangulated her to death and that opportunity was utilised for implicating the husband who had deserted her just on the day of marriage. Regard being had to the facts, indicated above, let the above named 3 petitioner be released on his furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, in Sigori P.S.Case No. 21 of 2005. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)