-..^ ^ Respondents HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (c) No. 1685 of 2007 Petitioner : Kumari Kaushilya Mannewar, D/o Shri Laxmi Prasad Mannewar, Aged about 20 years, R/o Bhairav Nagar, Mathepurena Raipur, C.G. Versus :1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Department ofAdim Jati Thatha Anusuchit Jati Vikas, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2- Member, Secretary and Commissioner, Jati Praman Patra Uccha Estariya Chhanbin Samiti, Pt. Ravishankar Vishwavidalaya Parisar, Raipur, C.G. SB : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri, J. Present: Mr. Satendra Sahu, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Utkarsh Verma, Dy. Govt.Advocate forthe respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on this 22nd day of March, 2007) T.hs petitionsr claims to be a membsr of the Schsdu!ed Tribe C-aste i.e. Mannewar. The issue was decided by the Caste Scrutiny Committee vide order dated 23.09.2005 that the petitioner did not beiong to the same community. Earlier, the petitioner had filed a writ peiition, being W.P. No,5836 of 2005, before this Court to quash the order dated 23.09.2005, passed by the Caste Scrutiny Committee/Respondent No. 2. The said order was quashsd vide orderdated 31.03.2006 on the ground that no sufficient opportynity of hearing was afforded to the petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner had filed one more writ petition, being W.P. No. 2552 of 2006, before this Court seeking admission in the institution of Chhattisgarh Institute of Medical Science (CiMS) on the basis of the caste certificate of the petitioner i.e. Mannewar as the Bablu same was cancelledvide order dated 24.9.2005,wherein this Court vide order dated 11 September, 2006 (P/1) passed the following order- "In the result and for the foregoing reasons, the order (Annexure-P/4) made by the third respondent dated 24.09.2005 is set aside on the ground that the order was passed by the third respondent on the basis of theorder ofthe Caste Scrutiny Committee dated 23.09.2005 which is already quashed. It is now open to the High Power Caste Verification Committee to proceed further and take a decision on the issue of the caste status of the petitioner after giving her fair opportunity to adduce evidence and of being heard and, thereaftenivards, the third respondent depending upon the outcome of the enquiry of the State High Power Caste Verification Committee to decide whether the petitioner should be given admission or not. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs." . 4. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking a direction to the respondent No. 2 to dispose of the case of the petitioner, expeditiously, within a period of six weeks, so that the petitioner may appear in the Pre Medical Testfor admtesion to M.B.B.S. Course. 5. In normal circumstances, this direction cannot be issued. However, keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has been moving the Caste Scrutiny Committeeand this Court for about last two years, it is directed that the Caste Scrutiny Committee/Respondent No. 2 shall consider and decjde the case of the petitioner, in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of six weeks from the date of receiptofacopyofthisCourt. ,, 6. With the aforesaid direction, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge