HISH COURTOFCHHATTESSARH AT BILASPUR Wnt Petition Np. 277 of 2001 Petitioner Versus Respondents 1. - 2. 3. R. ^. Shukla, S/o Late R. 5. Shornta, eged about 57 years, Technical Assistunt Grode-l, Food Corporation of Indio, Storuge Etepot Mahosmnund, Oisrr. AAahasamund (Chhattisgorh); Food Corporntion of Indin, Through - Senior Regfonal Mflrtttger, Food Corpoi-atkm of India, Chetak Buildiry, Mohnrwia Prataft Nagar. Habib 6anj. Bhopaf (M.P.). District Monager, Food Corporution of India. Atedina Manzil, Jail Road, feiipur (ChhattiSQarh). Zonal Atoiager, Food Corporotion of Indio, Mistry Bhawun. &W ftoad Churchgate, Munibai (Mdiaraditro). Singla Bench : Hon'ble Mr- Satish K, AgnihotFJ. J. ^5.'i. .:.... "'""aiiiigfe. Shri V. & Tamastor, Advocate for the petittoner. Shri 8. P. Sun-ta, Adyoaite for the re^ondents. ORAL OR&ER (Passed on -this 24th day of June, 2008} I- Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner subniits •that with the passagK of time, 1+iis petition has become infructuous, as no grievance of the petitioner airvives. 2. Leamed counse! qipeoring for the respondent hos no objection to the above submission. 3. In yiew of -the foregomg. ih'is petition is dismissed os having become infructuous. No order asto costs. , Satish K. Agnihotri Thakur Judge