IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.80 of 2006 NAVIN KUMAR MARIK @ BHARIK SON OF LATE NATHUN MARIK RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BALUA, P.O. S. KATORIA, P.S. AMARPUR, DISTRICT- BANKA. … PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LABOUR, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, BHAGALPUR DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR. … RESPONDENTS. For the petitioner: Miss. Alka Verma, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr.R.K. Verma, Sr.Advocate. ----------- 2. 13.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the Employees Provident Fund Organization. 2. Petitioner is the in-charge of a Jaggery Mill, is aggrieved by the order dated 21.12.2004, whereunder their liabilities under Section 7A of the Employees Provident Fund Act has been fixed. Aforesaid order was passed on the basis of the inspection report copy whereof was served on the petitioner under memo dated 7.2.2005. Petitioner assailed the said order by filing the present writ petition on 4.1.2006. Stamp reporter pointed out defect(s) in the petition which was considered by this court under orders dated 17.1.2006 and the Court observed that the defect(s) in the petition shall be considered at the time of 2 admission, matter has been taken up for admission today i.e. after more than four years after filing of the writ case. In the facts and circumstances aforesaid, I dispose of the writ petition directing the petitioner to avail the remedy of the appeal. The appeal be filed within 30 days from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. Requisition for grant of certified copy should be filed by tomorrow. In the event the appeal is filed within 30 days from the date of receipt of the certified copy then the appellate authority may consider the desirability to condone the delay. Ibrar/- ( V. N. Sinha, J.)