W.P.(C) 8508/2008 Page 1 $~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8508/2008 OM PATI ..... Petitioner Through: Nemo versus DTC ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat and Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR O R D E R % 27.04.2017 C.M.6222/2014 By way of this application, respondent seeks restoration of C.M.16911/2011 seeking clarification, which was dismissed on 4th April, 2014. Learned counsel for applicant-respondent submits that the lapse in taking steps for service in C.M.16911/2011 seeking clarification upon opposite side was bona fide and not intentional and the clarification sought is essential for implementation of directions issued while disposing of this petition. None appears on behalf of petitioner even on the second call. Upon hearing, I find that although there is no negligence on part of applicant/respondent, but the negligence is not gross one. Hence, the application is allowed and C.M.16911/2011 is restored for hearing. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 8508/2008 Page 2 C.M.16911/2011 (seeking clarification) Upon applicant/respondent taking steps within a week, notice of this application be issued to counsel opposite by speed post, returnable for 31st August, 2017. Affidavit of service alongwith tracking report be filed. It is made clear that if effective steps are not taken this time, then applicant/respondent would be burdened with suitable costs on the next date. SUNIL GAUR, J APRIL 27, 2017 s