1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 13 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 283 OF 2003 Dist.: PUNE Taibai Keru Bhalerao, Widow of Keroo Waloo Bhalerao ...Review Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. J.M. Tanpure with Mr. A.P. Vanarse for the Review Petitioner Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondents. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and SMT. N.N. MHATRE , JJ. DATE: DECEMBER 2, 2008 (in Chamber) P. C.:- Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The order dated 20th January, 2005 had been passed by this Court, while the review petitioner, who was the respondent in the Writ Petition, was not present. The review petitioner contends that the order of the High Court was based on the ground that the applicant was a casual labour, which was not correct. 2 3. In this view of the matter, we recall the order dated 20th January, 2005, restore Writ Petition No.283 of 2003, and direct the review petitioner to file her counter within two weeks. The petition be listed for final hearing before the appropriate Court on 20 th January, 2009. 4. In the meantime, the orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 11th January, 2001 and 31st October, 2002 challenged in this Writ Petition shall remain stayed. 5. The Review Petition is accordingly disposed of. BILAL NAZKI, J. SMT. N.N. MHATRE, J.