IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-30375 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.11.2009 Charanjit Singh .. Petitioner v. State of Punjab .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Kulbir Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ... Rajesh Bindal J. The allegations against the petitioner in the FIR are that he had handed over 35 grams smack in the bread loaf to one of the inmates in the jail, namely, Ranjit Singh, when he had gone to meet him in the jail. At the time of entry in the register, he had mentioned his driving licence number. The smack was found when the bread loaf was checked by the Deputy Superintendent of Jail on suspicion. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated for the reason that he had earlier remained in the jail from 26.9.2008 to 21.10.2008 in a case registered against him and during that period, there was some dispute with the jail staff. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submits that there are three other FIRs registered against the petitioner under the Indian Penal Code and Arms Act and considering the conduct of the petitioner, he does not deserve the concession of anticipatory bail. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the allegations in the FIR against the petitioner and also his previous conduct in three other FIRs, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to him. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 17.11.2009 mk