^O^ 18 THE HIGH G008T OP JODIC&TOBg &T J&BALPO^ ^ W8IT PSTITI08 N0. f<&^A /1999. (W8IT PSITION 08DES AfiTICLE 226/227 OF THE C08STITOTI08 O? I8Dt&) PETITIOSSR: i ESP08DE8TS: t. Siii't- Ral^ant Kaur Wd/o Sfari La-be Shri Harbansfa Singh Cfaadha, aged aboat 65 years, R/o Tagore 8agar, Raipur (M<P.) //Versus// ^ 1« 8aipuy De^eiopiaent Authority, ^ A body i?ico3cporeited under Sectlon- 38 o-E Sagar Tatha €raia Nivesh &dhiniyam, faavxng xts' of-fice aA <3.g. Boad, Raipur (H.P.). ^- 2. The Chai3ciaan, Raipur Deveiopment Autihori-ty, Raipur (8.P.). >- 3. Tahsildar <8ecovex-y Officer), Saipur Development Authority, Baipur (M.P.) -L. SiEIS. PSTITION ONDSR ABTIGLS 226/227 OE. IfiK CONSTITO'FION QE. IfiillA. R|iN|—— .} ^^^^-^^ :w^^^^^ HIGH COURT OP JUDICATURE CHHATTI8GARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon^le Shri Satish K. Agaihotri, J. W,P,No,A823ofl999 Petitioner Respondents Smt. Kulwant Kaur Versus Raipur Developiaent Authorily and two ofhers. Shri Goutam Bhaduri, coiinsel for fhe petitioner. Shri B.P. Sharaia, counsel for respondents No. 1 and 2. Siat. Anju Ahuja, Depzity GoveniBient Advocate for flie respondent No.3. ORAL ORDBR (12h May, 2006) 1. I.A. No. 5010/2006, this is an application for withdrawal of fhe writ petition. Learaed coiinsel appeariag for fhe respondents have no objection, if the application is aUowed. 2. In view of the averaients inade ia fhe appUcation, the appUcation is ordered, as prayed for. 2. Conseqzienfly, fhe writ petition is disniissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. —~ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge c^^