,L. C§WQ/ S.B. (Service Matter} IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (syNof’59l 9r /201 1. PETITIONER: / Smt.Padma Dongre, daughter of Shri S.R.Patel, aged about 39 ycars, working as Upper Division Teacher, Schedule Tribe Boys Hostel, Bagdeva, Bilha, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Tribal Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. / 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. (r 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal welfare Department, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. /4. Block Education Officer, Block Bilha, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. /5. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA )@ mm- (W) mwf‘aia? mmm WW fsé?m mmm $Wm SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan hrivastava J. 05.07-2011 Shri KS, Pawar, counsel for th petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel Lawye for the State Heard. Learned counsei appearing fort e petitioner submits that the petitioner has passed B.Ed. examination in the year 003 and therefore, the petitioner is entitled to benefit or' two advance increments, s she has completed the B.Edi training at x her own expenses. Learned counsel for the petitio er submits that the issue involved in this writ petition is covered by the decsion in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporat on, Durg and another (2006 (I!) MPJR CG,96) & Gopesh Kumar Verma V . The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another (WP. (S) No.4130/2005). H also submits that this aspect has been considered by the Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh & another Vs. Badrinarayan Acharya e c. etc. (AIR 1996 SC 2H9). According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the etitioneris case is identical. in view of submissions so mad by learned counsel for the petitioner, it is directed that respondents shall consid r the claim ofthe petitioner in the light of her submission and the judgment, wh' h have been referred to and if it is found that the petitioner is also identically sit ated, the benent shall also be extended to the petitioner. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge Deepti WWW, W—Fsmo—z/zot 1—1 ,so,ooo.