{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1218 OF 1994 Sou.Pushpa Rajendra Hangargekar, R/o Hangarga (Wadi), Taluka-Tuljapur Dist-Osmanabad PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra Through Secretary , Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Osamanabad 3. The Sarpanch, Shri Manohar Nivrutti Hangargekar R/o Hangarga, Tq-Tuljapur Dist-Osmanabad 4. The Head Master Zilla Parishad Primacy School Hingarga (Wadi) Tq-Tuljapur Dist-Osmanabad RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.S.S.Chaudhari, Senior Counsel for the petitioner Mr.K.B.Chaudhari, Addl.G.P. for respondent State ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, and A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 31st July 2009 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER P.V.HARDAS, J.) : 1. This is a petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution {2} of India, by which the petitioner challenges an order dated 24th January 1994 terminating the services of the petitioner as Balwadi Helper (Balwadi School Mother). 2. The petitioner had been appointed on a purely temporary basis and her services were liable to be terminated at the end of the contractual period i.e. 30.04.1994. About three months prior to that, services of the petitioner came to be terminated. The petitioner, accordingly, has filed the present petition. 3. Mr.Chaudhari, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner, thereafter, had been reinstated and the Division Bench of this Court had passed the following order. “Interim relief to the extent that petitioners’ services on her reinstatement should not be discontinued.” This order came to be passed on 14th October 1998. On account of passage of time and the fact that the interim order has been operating till today, according to us, no further interference is warranted in the present petition. Writ petition is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. Rule stands discharged. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/wp1218-94