IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 815 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 89 OF 2007 SHRI. SOIRU PUNDALIK CAMOTIM MAMAI (DECEASED) THROUGH LR'S AND 7 ORS., ... Applicants Versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR (DEV) AND LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. V. K. Bodke, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. A. Kamat, Addl. Government Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- S.B. DESHMUKH & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 26th August, 2009 P.C. We have heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned Advocate General Mr. Kantak for the State. Learned Counsel for the applicant has pointed out earlier Order passed by this Court at Exhibit R-1 (page 28). This Order seems to have been passed by this Court on 08.09.2008. Learned Counsel for the applicant nos. 1 to 5 submits that Shri Zaivanta Vitola Camotim Mamai, is no more. Earlier Application No. 656/07 was filed through legal heirs of deceased Zaivanta Vitola Camotim Mamai. 2. We have perused the Order passed by this Court, Exhibit R-1, on 08.09.2008. Now the Counsel for the applicant submits that respondent-Zaivanta is no more. Respondent nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5, according to learned Counsel, have given oral instructions that they have no objection for the present application since earlier Order dated 08.09.2008, passed by this Court, is in their favour. Now, the Counsel for the applicant seeks similar Order in favour of respondent nos. 6 to 13 and they also be permitted to withdraw the amount of compensation i.e. to the extent of 50% of their respective share. Learned Advocate General for the State has no objection for such withdrawal. 3. In this view of the matter, we permit respondent nos. 6 to 13, who are now applicants (original claimants and Respondents in the First Appeal), to withdraw the sums to the extent of 50% of their share alone at this stage. Such withdrawal is also permitted along with the interest accrued, to the extent of 50% of their share individually. Such withdrawal is permitted without furnishing any security by the respondent nos. 6 to 13. Computation of the amount and calculation of the amount to be carried out and thereafter such withdrawal is permitted in favour of respondent nos. 6 to 13 on an undertaking to be filed in this Court. Undertaking should be in usual form and subject to final Orders in the appeal and that the respondents shall re-deposit the sum if directed by this Court and they shall also abide by the directions given by this Court in the Appeal. Misc. Civil Application is disposed off in above terms. S.B. DESHMUKH, J. U. D. SALVI, J. arp/*