CRM No. M 19652 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 19652 of 2010 Date of decision: 07.02.2011 Inderjit Singh ........ Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. L M Gulati, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State Mr. Gourav Bhayyia, Advocate for Mr. B S Jaswal, Advocate for respondent No. 5 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of direction to respondents No. 1 and 2 to protect the life, liberty and property of the present petitioner as well as his family members at the hands of respondent No. 4 and his other police officials. Reply on behalf of respondent No. 5 has been filed in Court today. The same is taken on record. Reply on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3 has also been filed. CRM No. M 19652 of 2010 2 Preliminary submissions made therein reads as under:- That complaint of the petitioner addressed to the Inspector General of Police, Boarder Amritsar and Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar Rural respondent No. 2 was got enquired through SI Joginder Singh of CIA Staff, Amritsar Rural and concluded that petitioner Inderjit Singh son of Nirmal Singh resident of Gali No. 2, Gobind Singh Nagar, Majitha Road, Amritsar is not living at his mentioned address. The facts brought in light that the petitioner acted as go between (dalal) along with others in the sale f land of Tarlochan Singh son of Teja Singh resident of Kuralian, P S Kathu Nangal and received Rs.9 lac by the petitioner as commission amount along with Tarsem Singh and Amrik Singh colleagues of the petitioner but deal could not materialize. Tarsem Singh and Amrik Singh had returned Rs.2 lac of their share but the remaining Rs.7 lac received by the petitioner are not returned till now. Allegatins levelled by the petitioner Inderjit Singh were not proved during enquiry conduced by DSP Detective, Amritsar Rural hence complaint of the petitioner was filed being devoid of force.” Learned State counsel, on instructions from HC Manjeet Singh, Police Station Kathu Nangal, states that no complaint is pending against the present petitioner as of date at police Station Kathu Nangal. In view of the above, no further order is required to be passed. Disposed of accordingly. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 07.02.2011 mohan