IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6896 of 2010 1. RADHA KUMARI, W/O DOMAN SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-TILAKPURA TOLA GAGAN BIGHA,P.O.-SIHADI,BLOCK-HASPURA,DISTRICT-AURANGABAD (BIHAR). 2. CHANCHALA KUMARI, D/O SIDHNATH SINGH, R/O VILLAGE+POST- DUMARA,BLOCK-HASPURA,DISTRICT- AURANGABAD (BIHAR) Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT,GOVT. OF BIHAR,PATNA. 2. DIRECTOR,PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT,GOVT. OF BIHAR. 3. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, AURANGABAD,BIHAR. 4. DISTRICT PANCHAYAT RAJ OFFICER,DISTRICT- AURANGABAD. 5. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, AURANGABAD, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD. 6. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,HASPURA,DISTRICT- AURANGABAD. 7. SERPANCH,SONHATHU,HASPURA,DISTRICT- AURANGABAD. 8. THE SERPANCH,DUMARA,HASPURA,DISTRICT- AURANGABAD. 9. BIMALA KUMARI, W/O AMARESH SHARMA, R/O VILLAGE-TILAKPURA,P.O.- ANGRAHI,BLOCK+P.S.- HASPURA,DISTRICT- AURANGABAD (ILLEGALLY APPOINTED AT THE POST OF PETITIONER NO.1 RADHA KUMARI) 10. ASHA (DEVI) KUMARI, W/O RABINDRA PRASAD AKELA, R/O VILLAGE-DUMARO TOLA JAMAL BIGHA,BLOCK+P.S.- HASPURA,DISTRICT- AURANGABAD (ILLEGALLY APPOINTED AT THE POST OF PETITIONER NO.2 CHANCHALA KUMARI. ----------- For the Petitioners: M/s P.L.Jaiswal, Ranjit Kumar and Ranvijay Kumar Sharma, Advocates For the Respondents: Mr. Mukund Mohan Jha, AC to SC 7. ------- 2. 26.11.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the State. The matter relates to termination of Sachiv, Gram Kuthery, appointed on the basis of Matriculate qualification, termination of such appointment and consideration of a Madhyama qualification holder made equivalent by a subsequent legislative amendment. This question has been considered in detail by this Court in CWJC No. 4494 of 2010 disposed on . The petitioners are stated to have represented. Let the representation be considered and disposed off in accordance with law and the order of this Court as aforesaid preferably within a maximum period of four weeks from the date of receipt and/or presentation of a copy of this order after hearing all concerned including Respondent no. 10. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)