HIGH COURT OF GHHATnSGARH : BILASPUR ^^ PETITIONER WRITPETITION ?Cr.) (PR) N0.1370 OF 2009 L^ P^C-ir.J -S^O&fC)^ RESPONDENTS ^.- 3. 5. 6. 7. 8. Smi Geeta Mishra, aged about 40 ysars, wife of Shri Jyoti Prakash Mishra, House Wife, Social Worker Rampur, Residentof Baigin Dabhar, Ward 24 of Korba Town near the bungalow of Superintendent of Poiice, Korba, Tah.& Dist. Korba. Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Colfector, Korba (CG). through the Smt. Putribai, aged about 86 yeare, widow of late Rudra Prasad Sonl, R/o Puranibasti, Korba. Abhra Kumar Brahmin, aaed abput 36 years, S/o AlikBhushan Brahmln, Service, R/b LiG 140 Maharana Pratep Nagar, Kosabadi, Korba, Tah. & Distriet Korba. Gyanchhandra Goyal, aged about 47 years, S/o Shri Poiyram Goyal, Cloth Merchant, R/Q Main Road, Surajpur, Tah. Surajpur, District Surguja; Shri O.N. Dwivedi, aged about46 yeara, S/o Shri Matalathar &wivedi, Setttement Officer, Korba, Through the Collector, Korba, Tah. & Distt. Kerba. Shri Mohan Lal Sharma, ased about 60 years, Now retired Revenue Inspector, Korba, Through ttie Coilector, Korba, Tah; &Distt.Korba. Superintendent (Land Records), Kort»a, through the Coltector, Korba, Tah. & Distt. Korba. Shri Jagdeo Prasad, aged about 40 years, Assistant Superintendent (Revenue Oepartment), Korba, Through ttie Collector,Korba, Tah. & Distt. Korba., Shri Harishanker Vadeo, aged atx>ut 40 years, S/onot known, worldng as Tracer & Surveyor in Revenue Department, Korba, through the Collector, Korba, Tah. & Distt; Korba. . 10. Sub Registrar, Korba, ThrQugh Coilector, Korba. 11. CSEB, through the Executive Engjneer (O & W), Korba, Tah. & Dist. Korba (CG). -?-• Gowri 12. Superintendent of Police, Korba, Tah. & Distt.Korba (CG). (Writ petition under Articie 228/227 ofthe Censtitution <^ India) Single Bench : Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present;- Mr. A.K. Agrawai, counsei for the p&titioner. Mr. Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer for theState. ORDER(ORAD • (Passed on this 301" day of June,2009) Learned counsel appearing for the petiUoner, on instructions, submte that the petitioner seeks permission of this court to wiUidraw Uiis petition In the light of decision of this Court rendered^in Mohd. Anish Menon vs. State of CG & Others , with liberty to take recourse to the proper fortim that may be availabie to her, to which tearned counsei appearing for Ihe State has no objection. 2) itis ordered as prayed for. 3) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismlssed as withdrawn witti the aforesaid libertv. Sd/- SATISH K. ANGNmOTM Judge •ww~^. ^^^ '^/ ' 2009(1)cou 315