@ (“/K} \W/r Singg gemh IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH (L ; 260.3 IW.P. lg No. Qg 30 [gg/ PETITIONER z: Radha Krishana Soni, aged about / 63 years, S/o. Late Shri Bhagwat Soni, R/o Nawapara Near Mishra Aata Chakki Ambikapur Distt. Suguja (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhatusgarh Through Sécretary of Labour Departrhent D.K.S. Bhawaii Raipur (C.G.) 2) Depmy’ Labouf Commiesiorie‘f arid appellate authOfity urider‘ payment of gratulty Act 1972 Office of Labour Comrmssmner Shaiik‘af Nagér Ralpur (C G ) 3) Chief Executive Ofiiee’iDistt. Co'~ operative Bank Ltd. Ambikapur AT BILASPUR M/ / CONSTITUTION OF f/ INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF Distt. Sugu’ja (C.G.). / ‘ ,. WRIT PETITION) UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE APPROPRIATE wm'r/wm'rs, ORDER/ORDERg, DIRECTIONIDIW/ / ,> HIGH COURT OF CHHAT'HSGARH AT BIL ‘ "'R WRIT PETITION (L) No. 4130 of 2009 PETITIONER : Radha Krishana Soni. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE‘CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnillotri, J. Present: Smt. Hamida Siddique, Advocate for the petitioner. Slm' A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri Rakesh Pandey, Advocate for the respondent No. 3. . ORAL ORDER (Passed on 10m day of March, 2010). LA. NO‘ 2. This is an application for taking document on record. The application is ordered as prayed for. LA. NO; 1. This is an application for withdrawal of the writ petition, on the grounds stated therein. Learned counsel appearing for other side have no objection. It is ordered accordingly. Consequently. the writ/petition is dismissed as withdrawn. /"’i 1 Sd/ ’ ’ t Satish K. Aénihotri- Judge Amit E