IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20421 of 2010 SHANKAR PRASAD S/O LATE BRAHMDEO PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ---- 2. 16.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that when marital discord arose between the spouses and enquiry was done by the police into the matter and it was found that in fact the dissatisfaction of the complainant was on account of the fact that the petitioner was impotent. It has further been submitted that thereafter the present complaint was filed on trumped up charges, even though the satisfaction was on account of some other reason. In view of such, in the event of surrender of the petitioner, named above, within four weeks from today in connection with Complaint case No.2 of 2009, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawadah, subject to the conditions as laid down u/s.438(2) Cr.P.C. and (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of - 2 - petitioner and (ii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )