1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 3372/2009 ( Ramkrushna @ Rambhau Shaligram Dandge .vs. Sate of Mah. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr. S.V. Sirpurkar, Advocate for Applicant Mr. A.D. Sonak, APP for Respondent. CORAM : P.D. KODE, J. DATED : DECEMBER 16, 2009 Heard. In spite of an interim direction being given vide order dated 16.10.2009, still the prosecution agency has not been able to ascertain the matters ordered to be verified vide the said order. Having regard to the same and the learned APP being not able to show any material from the case diary except the statement of complainant of the applicant having met the complainant in connection with the transaction for which the complaint has been lodged, in the interim direction deserves to be confirmed. Needless to add that the learned APP was also not able to show any material revealing the applicant had a talk on mobile phone with the complainant as alleged. Having regard to the same, interim direction given on 16.10.2009 deserves to be confirmed as the same cannot be kept pending for a 2 longer period. However, since the investigation is said to be in progress and the applicant is said to be posted at border, the liberty deserves to be given to the prosecution for guarding the rights of the investigating agency. The interim direction given on 16.10.2009 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions. In addition to the same, the applicant shall attend the I.O. for a period of three days in between 11 a.m. & 2 p.m. for the purposes of investigation within a period of six weeks from today. Liberty to the prosecution in accordance with the law to apply for cancellation and/or modification of the direction given. Application stands disposed of. JUDGE halwai