IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2011 / 11TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 11943 of 2011(P) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ SHAMEEM. T.P, S/O.ASSAINAR. T.P, AGED 23 YEARS, THARAMMAL PUTHANPEEDIYAKKAL HOUSE, P.O.RANDATHANI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 510. BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE MANAGER, CANARA BANK, KALPAKANCHERY BRANCH, P.O. KALAPAKANCHERY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT- 676 551. 2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 553. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KALAPAKANCHERY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 551. R1 BY ADV. MR.PAULLY MATHEW MURICKEN, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/06/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.11943 of 2011 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T ---------------------- Challenge in this writ petition is against the revenue recovery steps initiated for realisation of amount due from the petitioner to the 1st respondent Bank, in a loan account availed by him. Eventhough various contentions are raised, I find no legally tenable ground to hold that the petitioner is in no way liable to pay the amount under demand. However, as a gesture of indulgence, coercive steps of recovery was stayed by virtue of an interim order dt.12.4.2011 insisting upon a condition for payment of Rs.2 lakhs in 2 equal instalments falling due on or before 30.4.2011 and 31.5.2011. 2. It is conceded that the petitioner had failed to remit the amount as stipulated in the interim order. Under the above circumstances, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition any further. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. okb