BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l SECOND APPEALNO.^/T^ /2006 ir^^lb P©^i^ 'Wi|1@ APPELLANT ^'/3ZA//^7r/^<7 ^ ^- RESPONDENTS ^A^^^^^^^ ^cP^^ ^f^ ..-^^ \\ G ^^ ^' sf^- Smt. Nandani aged about 42 years, wife of Shri Daulat Ram and Father Shri Benuram Agrawal, caste Agrawal, resident of Dewari Tah. Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa ^Chhattisgarh) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the District CoIIector, District Janjugir-Champa (C.G.) 2. Gram Panchayat Dewari Khorsi, fhrough - itrs Sarpanch Gram panchayat Dewari Khorsi, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) SECOND APPEAL UDNER SECTION 100 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908 ValuatiQnof XI-HC-78 W^l<rti Sft^iicn 3:ST^TPTRW, ^TftaTR, (G«nwy ^^ JlAm..SJ^/^^ 200 ^' <\ 3TI^T^r1^IW ^ ^Oht' 3<I^IMs(tb (<^3al^ar) chl^?d4i^ WMf^ fe^ <^^l< ^3Tf^T3^T Shrj Aii ASQQV, Counsel f<^r the oppeltant. Shpi Akhij ^gnswal, P.L f^>r the State. Heerd on admissjon. The appellant is aggriev^d fay the judgment and decree dated 27.03.2006 passed by the AdcJJtionGl District Judge, Janjgir in Cj'vi! Appeal No. 55-A of 2CX)5 where^y the judgment and decree pcsssed by the Stecond Civil Judge CJass-2, ] dated 29.03.2003 djsmissing the] It is not disputed that t| icnds and forest tands in the t^ claimed titte only on the basis of the year 1929-30, Luduram. Janjg'r in Civjl Suit hto. 66-A of 2000 suit for the pSaintiff WQS affi'rmed. |ie suit lands were recorded as grass [ecords of settlement. The pjaintiff |a documenf Ex.P.l which shcsw-s thct in icestor of the plaintSff, was in possession. However, there is <]ibsoJutely nothing on record to show that any time thereofter plaintif^ or hfe ancestor was in possession of the suit Sands. Boith the courts S(elow have, on proper apprai'sat of the evidence both oral and docum^ntary, rejected the cJaim of the 1-he suit lands and have also correctly plaintiff regording the tltte over refused to grant reliefof {njuncti I am of the considered op £>n. nion that no substantial question of Jow arises for determination in ^his apped. This second apped is djsmissed at the s-toQe of admisst^ n. No order as to costs. Sd/- DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge P.T.O.