(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3057 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3057 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3057 OF 2004 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9231 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO. 9231 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO. 9231 OF 2003 Smt. Shantidevi Kamaleshkumar Yadav ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ..... Shri. P.N. Patil, Advocate for the Applicant Shri. S.R. Nargolkar, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 1, 5, 7 and 8. Shri. R.V. More, Advocate for respondent No.6. Shri. D.V. Dubey, Adv. for respondent No.10 ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: 21ST DECEMBER, 2004 DATED: 21ST DECEMBER, 2004 DATED: 21ST DECEMBER, 2004 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant, learned A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1,5, 7 and 8, learned counsel for respondent No.6 and learned counsel for respondent No.10. 2. By this Civil Application, the applicant is seeking expeditious hearing of the writ petition (-2-) No.9231 of 2003. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, especially with regard to the election of the Municipal Corporator, hearing is expedited. Writ Petition No.9231 of 2003 be peremptorily placed on board on 24.1.2005 for hearing. Rule made asbolute in the above terms.