IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16686 of 2010 RAJDEO SINGH . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . with Cr.Misc. No.16765 of 2010 SIYARAM YADAV @ SIA RAM YADAV . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02 21.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the complainant, who has appeared suo motu. Learned counsel for the petitioners refuting the allegations of cheating under Sections 420, 203, 465, 470 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, submits that the lands were agreed to be sold without any understanding, that it was to be used for commercial purposes as wrongly stated in the complaint.. The agreement, which has also been produced during hearing before the court contains no such clause. The complainant has subsequently realised that his commercial venture on the lands proposed to be purchased would not materialize due to municipal restrictions. The petitioners are ready and willing to execute the sale deeds and that the entire allegations have a civil flavour. The offences alleged appear to be a purely private dispute and prima facie compoundable in 2 nature , let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 1165(C) of 2008, Trial No. 794 of 2009. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)