IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS No. 106 of 2007 WITH SUIT No.2 of 1988 IN PETITION No.629 of 1985 Carom Anthony Alex D’Souza ..Plaintiffs. Vs. John G. D’Souza ..Defendants. And Mrs Shantidevi Amarnath Singh and Anr. ..Intervenors. Ms Sangita Musle i/b V.J. Hegde, Advocate for the plaintiffs. Mr B. G. Saraf, Advocate for the Intervenors. Ms Brenda D’Souza, Advocate for the Defendants. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C. DAGA,J. V.C. DAGA,J. V.C. DAGA,J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 07.01.2008. 07.01.2008. 07.01.2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. On the motion made by learned counsel for the plaintiffs, he is allowed to withdraw the Chamber Summons. The same is dismissed as withdrawn. 2. No order as to costs. 3. Plaintiffs are directed to file affidavit of evidence in support of suit claim. Parties to the suit are directed to file their original documents on which they propose to rely. They are also directed to serve notice to admit documents on their rival parties which they are expected to reply by next date of hearing. 4. Plaintiffs are also expected to be ready with evidence on the next date of hearing to prove documents; denied by the defendants. Parties are put on notice that no further adjournment would be granted. 5. The matter to come up on board after two weeks for framing issues. (V.C. (V.C. (V.C. DAGA,J) DAGA,J) DAGA,J)