IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30627 of 2010 SITARAM YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 03.01.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is alleged for giving order complying which co-accused persons slapped the complainant. Co-accused Ranjit Yadav snatched Rs. Three thousand and co-accused Dinesh Yadav snatched wrist watch. Further they took his signature on blank paper. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that due to enmity with complainant, he has been named in the case; otherwise reason behind the incident was non-compliance of accused persons threatening to compromise earlier Sourbazar P.S. Case No. 290/2009 for killing of informant niece’s (Bhagni) daughter. Submission of the learned counsel for petitioner is that in that case charge sheet was submitted, but exonerating petitioner. There is no recovery in the case and signed papers are not used anywhere. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No.652 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.) 2