S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHRA.TTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATnSGARH) WRITPETITION (StNo6^17/2011. PETITIONER: Resuondents ^ <^^ /f;,/N<v Jaitram Yadav, son of Bisahu Ram Yadav, aged about 59 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, residence of village Barpali, Post Hasua, Tahsil Kasdole, District Raipur, Chhatdsgarh. versus / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Dista-ict Educadon Officer, District Baloda Bazar, Chhattisgarh. 3. Block Education Officer, Kasdole, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur, District Raipiu-, C.G WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ..^ ~"^ ^ ^"•"" ^^^ ^ j' t .^s':.^. 8 ! vffsy y i -^' y HIQH C»URTOF CaiHATTIS<iARH AT BILAK»I» SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICB PRITHHfER DIWAMER PBTITIONER RESPONDENTS W.P.ISIJWO. S555/2011 Jaitram Yadav versus State of C.G. & Offaers ^~ Shri K-P.Sahu, counsel for fhe petitioaer. Shri A.V.Shridhar, P.L. for the State. WRIT PBTITIOW OTTOER AKTICLB 226 OP THB COKSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDBR (19.09.2011) Coiiasel for fhe petitioner submits fliat thc petitioacr is entitled to benefit oftwo advance iacreiaents on account ofhe hawng passcd B.T.I. exaxnination after his appointiuent at his own cost. It M submitted that fhe issuc uivolved itt fhe present petition is ao longer res integra and the same has been finally decided by the Hon'ble Suprcme Court in fhe case ofAsha Saaiena Vs. Statc ofM.P. te 0»s. 2W»(inptPJR (SC)S9. It is further subiaitted tibiat fhis Court has also takcn a smrilar view in its order dated 6.2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6257/2008. Counsel for the petitfoners further subiuits tbat tfae order dated 29.4.2010 passed m Writ Appeal N0. 124/2009, wherem retying upon thejiidgment offhe Suprenie Court ia the casc ofAAa Saxena (supra) aud fhe order passed by fhis Court in anofher Writ Aff>eal No. 87/2009, directions have been tesued for consideration of fhe cas€ for grant of two advance tncremetits as per circular dated 21.9.1974 Issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after venficattou of the facts pleaded ia fhe petition. Counsel for the State subimts that case of fhc petitiouer woiihi also be considercd on fhe saiae liaes. lu view ofabove, ffae petition is disposd: ofwtfh a dtoecdon to the respondent aufhoriti.es to decide the claim ®fthe petitioner for grant of two advance mcreinents as per circular dated 21.9.1974 issued by fhe State of Madhya Pradesh aflter verificatioa of fhe facts plcaded in fhe petition withia a period offour monfhs ftoai today. It is made clear that this Court has aot expressed aay opaiion on merits ofthe case aad fbe aufhorily concemed would be at liberty to decide the same strictiy in accordaace wifh ]aw. Sd/- Judge