THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 28202 OF 2011 O R D E R : The case in this Writ Petition lies in a very narrow compass. The writ petitioner is a physically challenged un-employed person. He responded to the notification issued by the respondent Indian Oil Corporation on 30.03.2010 for award of Rajiv Gandhi Gramin LPG Vitarak distributorship at Kruthivennu, Krishna District. He applied on 30.04.2010. This distributorship is reserved in favour of challenged persons. The petitioner has been short listed and empanelled at Sl.No.1 and the said fact was communicated by the respondent oil company on 29.11.2010, but however, noticing that the writ petitioner has not produced the registered conveyance deed vouching for his title over the land and also on the ground that the land offered was only of 404.62 square meters as against the required 480 square meters, action is initiated by the respondent oil company for deleting his name from the panel of selected candidates. The writ petitioner has filed his explanation, but however, through the impugned order dated 29.09.2011, his name was deleted from the panel. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the writ petitioner has already acquired title to the land in question and has also produced a copy of the registered sale deed in that regard. Therefore, the fact that he originally produced only a GPA-cum- agreement of sale need not be put against him in view of this subsequent development. The learned counsel would also submit that the petitioner has acquired site of requisite dimensions additionally and produced the necessary proof in that regard before the respondent. Sri P. Prabhakar, learned Standing Counsel, who took notice on behalf of the respondent oil company, is right in his submission that the information and documents furnished along with the application only can be looked into and examined and the offer made subsequently by the applicants cannot be taken into account or consideration. That must be the normal procedure and rule. Otherwise a person, who is ineligible at the begining, can improve his case by overcoming the disqualifying factors subsequently. Therefore, all applications have got to be judged based upon the material enclosed to the application and no subsequent material should be examined or considered. However, when once the respondent oil company has reserved the particular slot for being offered to a physically challenged person, as a part of its corporate social responsibility, they can re-consider the matter. If the petitioner has not offered any different land but the very same land, which he has offered initially and he has acquired complete title over it, that can be taken note of. Therefore, it is left to the respondent to take a decision as to whether it is proper and desirable to re-consider the entire issue, in view of the peculiar fact situation of reservation of the dealership in favour of physically challenged persons and there will not be many such challenged persons, who will be able to establish the dealership there. Let a decision be taken in the matter and communicated to the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With this, the Writ Petition stands disposed of at the admission stage with the consent of the learned counsel appearing on either side. No costs. ---------------------------------------------- (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) 18th September 2011 ksld