IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.Rev. No. 177 of 2010 Decided on: 25.2.2011 State of Himachal Pradesh …Petitioner Versus Madan Lal Kaushal …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For the respondent : None. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : There is no error apparent on the face of the record. Consequently, there is not merit in the present petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge February 25, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?