-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.1 OF 2007 APPEAL NO.1 OF 2007 APPEAL NO.1 OF 2007 Shri Tukaram D. Ligade ...Appellant v/s Shri Balbhimrao K. Kadam and ors. ...Respondents Mr Nitin Jadhav for Appellant. None for Respondents. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 20TH JULY 2007. -2- P.C. :- 1. Both the Courts below have concurrently found that the plaintiffs have established that they are owners of the land. The only submission made before me was that the plaintiffs did not enter the witness box, instead, another person who was given power of attorney by the plaintiffs, was examined by the Courts. In my opinion, as both the Courts below, on appreciation of documentary and oral evidence, have recorded a finding of fact, this Court cannot reappreciate the evidence and record a different finding. I do not see any substantial question of law arising in this appeal. Appeal is rejected. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Private Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. ------------------