IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 657 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.07.2010 S.C. Nagpal ....Petitioner Versus United Airlines and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present: -Mr. R.C. Setia, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Vishal Ranjan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Kunal Mulwani, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** VINOD K. SHARMA, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the application for amendment of the written statement was moved at belated stage when the case was fixed for arguments merely to delay the proceedings. Learned counsel for the respondents rebuts this argument by referring to the application moved for amendment of the written statement, wherein a positive stand has been taken that the respondent- applicant would not lead any evidence to prove amendment in the written statement. In view of the stand taken by the learned counsel for the respondents, in this Court, that the respondent would not lead any evidence in respect of the amendment, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this revision petition and prays that it be dismissed as not pressed. Dismissed as not pressed. (Vinod K. Sharma) July 27, 2010 Judge R.S.