IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6852 of 2002 SANJAY KUMAR @ SANJAY KUMAR BASNET, SON OF SHRI CHANDESHWAR PRASAD, AT + P.O. BARAHI, P.S. PARIHAR, DISTRICT SITAMARHI ------PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COLLECTOR, SITAMARHI. 3. DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND REFORMS, SITAMARHI SADAR. 4. SATYA NARAIN PASWAN, SON OF SRI TAPESHWAR PASWAN, AT + P.O. BARAHI, P.S. PARIHAR, DISTRICT SITAMARHI -------RESPONDENTS ----------- 4. 13.2.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also respondent no.4 and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that Bataidari Case No.3/2001-2002 is pending in the court of the Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Sitamarhi Sadar (respondent no.3) and no orders are being passed. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.4 submits that the petitioner has not filed any written statement/objection in the said Bataidari case and, as such, the present writ application praying therein to quash the entire proceedings of the aforesaid Bataidari case is premature. After hearing the parties, it appears that the petitioner has filed the present writ application with incomplete facts and no order passed in the said Bataidari case has been assailed. In the circumstances, I do not find any merit in the writ application. The same is, accordingly, dismissed, however, with 2 an observation that it will be open for the petitioner to appear and take appropriate steps in the aforesaid Bataidari case. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)