fe ^-^/ IN 1BE: HIGH CGUBT GiE' JUDICATTJRB/M. P. : aiABAfcPUR WKET PETITIGN N0. ;]s5<:t^' <3El 2000 Mithlesh Kumar Nirmalkar^ S/o Shri Ghisal Prasad Mirmalkar^ aged aboat 32 years^ ^o Vlllage^Tenghanmada^Janpad &ancfaayat^Kota,District^ Bilasptir, (M.P.), V E RS US . .. PSTxTlGNER. ^. 1- ® ie CoEmisslone r^ Bil aspar^Bi visioa- Bil aspur^M^ P^ <. •s ^ 2<-» The Colleetor Bilaspur^ Distrlct- Bilaspur/M, P. 3- Janpad Panchayat lfl©ta^ %rough Chief ExecutjLve officer^ T^isil-Kota,District- Bilaspur, M«P, 1 4- Sohanlal Dixlt, Secretary EE.ducation Cosmnittee^ Tahsil l<bta (S.E.o.), Districfc- Silaspur^M^P, 5- Sushil Kamar Soni^ S/o Kakhanlal Soai^ tesident of VJlllage Karwa^ Tahsil- jKbta^Mstrict- Bllaspar,M»P, 6W Karanlal Gaadharva^ Memher Education CQRmiittee^ Panchayat ^bta^ >ta,Bistrict- Bilaspur,M»P. . RiSPONDEN'ES v^--<.^% ^7^y» Contd... 2.. :.^lj 2, WRIT P&TITION UNBSR ARTICLEB 226/227 OF THE C(^STIT^TION ©£•INDIA K^ m iiij' ,^ i fl@l!!l IKi.. H1GJ1COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) Writ Petition No. 1398 of 2000 -ws PETITIONER RESPONDENTS VERSUS Mithlesh Kumar Nirmalkar The Commissioner and others Shri M. K. Sinha counsel for the petitioner. Shri Pravin Das Dy. GAforthe respondents/State. WRITPETITION UNDERARTICL^2260FTHE 1 CONSTITUTIONOFINDIA | ORDER i (01.09.2010) | ! Challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 24.01.200Q (Annexure P-1)passed by the commissioner, Bilaspur in Revision No. 95/A-r 15/98-99 dismissing the Revision preferred bythe petitioneragainsttheordero^ the Additional Collector dated 24.02.1999. 2. Atthe very outset, counsel for the respondents/State has pointed out that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of fiting a revision before State Government under Rule 5 of Chhattisgarh Panchayat (Appeat and Revision) Rules 1995 and therefore, for redressal of his grievances the petitioner shoulc| first approach the State Government. On this, counsel for the petitioner submit^ that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the State Government under Rule 5 of Chhattisgarh Panchayat (Appeal and Revision) Rules 19995. He however submits that the State Government may be directed to consider the point of limitation liberally keeping in view the fac^: that this petition is pending before this Court since the year 2000. 3. In view of above, withdrawal of the petition is permitted. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. In the eventuality of any revision being filed by the petitioner, the same is expected to be decided by the^ State Government in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. Pointof limitation is also expected to be considered by it liberally keeping in view the fact that the present petition filed before this Court is pending since the year 2000. —~ Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge ^•K. "•A:.^