IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5944 of 2005 MASOMAT KAMALI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 17. 16.4.2010. Mr. Lalan Kumar Singh for the petitioner, Mr. Anil Singh for the University and Mr. Anant Kumar, learned Assisting counsel to S.C.11 for the State are present. Learned counsel for the petitioner admits the payment of major portion of the dues towards the post retiral and other entitlements relating to the petitioner during the pendency of the proceedings, save and except as set out in the reply to the second supplementary counter affidavit filed on 22.1.2010 the details whereof are as follows : (I) Arrears of differential pension from 12.7.2001 to till now, on the basis of correct fixation of pension which comes to Rs.35000/-, (II) Arrears of gratuity on the basis of correct fixation of family pension, which comes to Rs.36980-22000 (paid) = 14980 has not been paid. (III) Risk coverage payment, in death case as per rule of the group insurance scheme Rs.48000 has not paid 2 (IV) Employees Welfare Fund Rs.7500 has not been paid till now. Learned counsel further submits that undoubtedly, the interest amount was paid to the petitioner vide Cheque No.620429 dated 5.4.2010 as stated in the third supplementary counter affidavit filed on behalf of the University but there is no response as to the aforesaid dues. Learned counsel further submits that under the relevant rules, the petitioner is entitled to the risk coverage payment under the group insurance scheme to the tune of Rs.48000/- as well as under the Employees Welfare Fund scheme to the tune of Rs.7500/-. He also submits that the petitioner is entitled to certain amounts towards differential pension and family pension as referred hereinabove. Learned counsel further admits that apart from the aforesaid claim, no other claim of the petitioner is subsisting. Learned counsel for the University submits that if the petitioner represents the aforesaid claims before the authority concerned of the University, the same would be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. 3 Having regard to the circumstances where admittedly major portion of the post retiral and other claims of the petitioner have been redressed at the hands of the University, no purpose would be served in keeping this writ petition pending and the same is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to raise his claim before the Registrar of the University together with supportive documents, rules and circulars issued by the University and who shall consider the claims of the petitioner and if the claims are found admissible and in accordance with the rules, the same would be paid to the petitioner within a period of three months from the date, such representation is filed. Needless to add that if the claims are found not admissible it should be rejected by a reasoned order. The writ petition is disposed of with the liberty aforesaid. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)