WP(C) 3114/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner w ould not like to pursue the writ petition against the respondent No. 6 and thus his name may be struck off. It is ordered accordingly. Necessary correction in the cause title shall be carried out by hand. Learned counsel for the FCI has produced the letter dated 15.7.2 011 addressed to the Executive Director (Vig), FCI Headquarters by the General M anager (Vig), FCI for Executive Director (NE). As per the said letter, the petit ioner shall be paid the amount in question, which was recovered from him towards implementation of the impugned orders, which have been interfered with by this Court. This writ petition has been filed for implementation of the judgment and order dated 7.1.2010 passed in WP(C) No. 5308/2009. Be it stated here that the w rit appeal being W.A. No. 34/2011 preferred against the said judgment and order has also been dismissed by order dated 25.1.2011. According to the letter, the r espondents reserve their right to file SLP against the said judgments with the p rayer for condonation of delay. This Court has got nothing to say on that. Since the respondents have undertaken to pay the amount back to the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of fixing the time limit for such refund as 31.8.2011. Let admissible amounts be refunded to the petitioner on or befor e 31.8.2011.