CF :a’dZ/ _@+ High Court gf Chhattishgarh a_t Bilasgur (C.G.) WP. (S) No. /7V200@7r In the Honble .T’Bhagwat Prasad Sahu, Aged years . .‘,..-;§( S/o Shn‘ Shukh Dev ‘5”) Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Rawa e, Post Tarra, District, Durg (C.G.) vgRgus Prasad Sahu, Ama~Pendre H, Village Tahsll Patan, 1.The Through State the Government Secretary, of Chhattiséarh, ‘ Education & Tribal Department YQ$ D.K’.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Distriét E Durg (CG) ducation Officer, india Writ getition for issu under articles 226 gf the Constitution of Order or orders, Direction . _ gr directtons. i 'itahie WRIT g writs, t\ \M‘ Certiorari, . . Prohibition ance .' T" of writ and -‘ in other the """"‘ nature su ‘ of N MANDAMU§ N... Km,“ x 1 r 9 \ @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA5PUR sINsLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. sATIsH K, AGNIHOTRI‘ .1, WRIT PETITION (5.) NO. 171 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION (5.) NO, 172 OF 2007 Pursho‘tumlal Chandrakar The S'rute Governmen‘t of Chha‘rfisgarh and ano‘l'her- warr PmnoN (5.) No. 173 OF 2007 e‘tifioner : Syn-r. Usha Tummknr Versus Regondems The Sta're Govemmen'l' of Chha't‘fisgarh and ano'rher wRIT PETITION (5.) Nor 174 OF 2007 Anil Kumar Choubey Pe'l'i1'ioner Respondents : The Sfa'fe Governmem of Chha'rfisgurh and another WRIT PETITION (5.) NO.175 OF 2007 5m: Pri‘rabha Mourya VBP$J$ Pe‘ri‘l'ioner Responden'ts The Sm're Govemmen‘l' of Chhaffisgarh and another WRIT PETITION ($3 NO.176 OF 2007 P Petitioner : Shyam Kishore Vaishnuv versus Rzgondems : The Sfa‘re Govemmenf of Chhamsgnrh and mother Pefi'rioner Smf. Rim Pawar Re§gondenfs The Sfofe Govemmenf of Chhnfrisgnrh and another @ 2 WRIT PETITION (5.) NO.177 OF 2007 WRIT PETITmN (5,) NOT 17$ QF 2007 WRIT PETITION (5.) NO,179 OF 2007 Pefi‘tioner : Kadni Ram Vermu The 51m: Governmzn'l’ of Chha'h'isgorh md another Respondenfs Presart : Mr. Ajay Shrivosfavu, Advocufe for fhe pz'rifioners. Mr. Sushi! Dubey, .6overnmerrf Advocate for fhz Sink/respondents. 0RD§R (Passed on 17* Day of January, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for fhe pefifioners as we” as learned Governmenf Advocafe appearing for the Sfafe/respondenfs joinfly submif fhaf 1h: fads and qmsfion of law involved in fhe presen‘l’ ba'roh of wrif pefifions are squareiy covered by The decision of ‘H’Iis Co‘urf in fhe m? of Yaslnvanf Kmr Bhmdtw vs. MW] Capmfion. Wywmrlm‘. Pefifioner , : Bhngwaf Prasad Snhu Responderrts : The Sm‘te Govemmen? of Chhamsgarh and ano‘rhzr Pefi'fioner : Pamsmm Sahu versus Respondems Th: 51mg Governmen‘l' of Chhaftisgarh md momer And @ 3 In subsequenf cases, i.e., Writ Pefi1’ion (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (éapuh Kwnar Vcrma vs. Th: sign 6'ovf. of thharfisgarh ’and anoflm') and o'rher connecfed maffers, decided by This Cour? on 15-12-2006, pursuanf 1'0 fhe memo do‘hd 28-1-1995, issued by fhe Secremry, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and 1he prospzcms of Diploma in Eduoafion Examinafion, if was clarified Thar The nomenciofure of the Basic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Dipioma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (6apesh Kumar Verma vs. The 5fafe 60W. ofCh/Iaffisgarh and another) (Supra). For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yas‘rmm‘ Kumar Bharadwqj (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T.I./D.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circularsdated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs A copy of this order be placed on the record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Bablu 1 2006 (II) MPJ'R-CG 96 ‘