^v IN IKE HZGH _COL7^R^^^^ BILA3PUR^(C.G. 5 W.P. N0. PETITIONERS ! Vs. RESPONDENTS i ^€-' ^y^y ^.y^" <0«^.^" ^^ /2 003 1, ChowarQm s/o Jhadram aged aboufe 58 years, 2• Ramkhi1awan s/o Takh atram, age SO years Both r/o P.0. Ganiyari, Tahsil Ta'khatpur Distt, Bilaspur (C.G»5 l^ State of Chhafetisgarh Through Gollecfeor Distt. Bilaspur (G«G«) 2. Mining Officer, District Mining Office, / Collecfeerate Bilaspur, Distri ct^ Bilaspur (C,0<) . ^. Anamilea shukla w/o Atul Shukla age 27 years, R/o Near Bhattiya Nagar Petrol Pump, iy.ng Road, Bilaspur (C.G,) 4^ Mustaq. Hussain s/b Ibrahim Bhai age 41 years, R/o K^aparganj Bilaspur (C^ PETITION.U/S 226/227 OF 03NSTITU3^N OF INDIA .n.^::j ^-f-~ XI-HC-22 ^"^ ^I^IM^, ^NR^, fa<ni^^< ^1*<^8 ^rHT^ 3^[?T <q=T^ ±^.^..Q..3^±l()\ "^ 200 '^^f 3:r?^T'^T TWT^ ^l^ ^n^^TT ,'?.. J-- -3:n^T'^RiT^^f^T .02.2004 Shri Ravish Veroia, coiinsel forjthe petitioners, Gr>s^I<n<fl-i tn^jf ^ fe^ ^N^K ^ 3?NR 3TT^T + Shri Ayaz Naved, Govt. Adv, fo^ Heard, the State. By this writ petition the petit^oners have challenged the jrder of respondent No, 1 whereby titi< le laad bearing Khasra N0,661/2 t|he purposes of settiag up of brick pas reserved for fhe ViUage Kotwa^ aad cattte field (Gouchar phuini). ^Learaed counsel for fhe petiti^ ^rqvi^ions of Section 237(2) aad (^ l^evenue Code, 1959, fhe CoUector| respondent No. 1 has given arca 7,18 acre on lease for kUn whereas fhe said laad »nersubniits that as per fhe >) of the Chhattisgarh Laad is uot entifled to divert the juse of fhe pasture aad service land for fhe purpose of settmg up bfa brick-kita without the resolutioili offhe Gram Sabha aad the jrespondent No. 1-CoUector has giver jup a brick-klhi ia violation of fhe j237 ofthe Chhattisgarh land Revej |the petitioners may be allowed t<| fhe laad on lease for settitig ^ub-mle (2) & (3) of Section ^iue Couft, 1959. Thereforc \> niake a representation to ^F XI-HC-22 ^TI^I'^T f^TJ?F'3RT^[ ^PTWTf^C? ^^ ^^\^~ ^a? '^TFTRT£T,^ftWT^, facnK-iy 3n^?r T?sra? WRWiF^J^*'***'* '"^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^"^^^^^ ^ 20° "l^^l' ^n^i "^^[^R ^rft<r o v direclted respondent No, 1 aad he be direc to which fhe leamed counsel circunistalaces objection. Haviag heard learaed cou^isel rcgard to the facts aad circunista|ace5 arc allowed to inake-a represent4tion to resgondent No.l, who ia tun|i within. aaother 30 days from| representation wifh a reasone^ poiats raised by fhe petitioners i4 / Witli fhe above direction tht In view of fhe above I.A,No. 1790/03 stand disposed (^ '^nfepft;T ^HdT ^ t^st 'd^R ^T ^rf^TH ^TI^T to decide the representation for the respoudents has no for fhe parties aad having of tlie case, fhe petitioners ion raisiag all fheir grievaaces wiU decide fhe representation the date of receipt of fhe order, after considerio.g fhe fh.eir representation. petition is disposed of, oider M.(W).P.No,630/03 & Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [Tfl^ ^f<^^ "t>