aaae''8Siti®*"T"""' BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR IC.G.) M.C.C. N0. 3^^/2006 Sing!? Bsnch' PETITIONER WON-APPLICANT / Srat. Varsha Rani Nag, wtfe of Shri Herald Vinay Nadan, aged about 31 years, presently posted as Woinan and Child Development, Project OfBcer, Head Quarter at Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS Herald Vinay Nadan, aged about 31 years, son of Late D.N. Nadan, resident of Shanti Nagar Ward, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (Chhattisgarh) ^^ PETITION UNDER SECTION 24 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908 FOR TRANSFER OF CASE N0. 71-A/2006 (HERALD VINAY NADAN V/S. SMT. VARSHA RANI NAG) OF JUDICIAL SEPARATION, FDLED UNDER SECTION 22 OF THE DIVORCE ACT, 1869 BY THE RESPONDENT / APPLICANT RESPONDENT /APPLICANT ^' XI-HC-7S 73! riliqifiq, ®T(IWIS,Rldlti^ m.ce. ^ ^^ ^- c • *11*1^11 !h*1ich WT 200^- aiict^i tia* ('^gsr^'ET) \~) u-^ 3:n^T?iTR-fi<t) aw SIT^T giiiNi ?TdTWHfS(T3TI^T tii'iiFcl'fl-i Hwvli if fS^S <KIW( ^sri^iTsn^r 17.11.2006 Shri H.S.Patel, learned cou^sel for the applicant. Shr's Subhash Yadav, learne|d counsel for the respondent. Learnsd counsel for the M.C.P.No.1079 of 2006 for std applicant does not press on /, which is dismissed as not pressed. At the request of parties, fhis M.C.C. is being disposed of finally at the stcge of admission. Heard. The applicant-wife has |filed this application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Ffrocedure for transfer of case No. 71-A of 2006 filed by tite respondent-husband under Section 22 of the Divorce Act. before the 1 Additiona! bistr Court of District Judge, Raipur 01 B5 1869 for judicial separation ict Jud9e, Jiydalpur, to the 1 following grounds; The petitioner is s|erving as Project Officer in Woman and CTiild &4ve'°Pfflent Project, Abhanpur, Ojstrict Raipur and if is extremely inconvenient for her to attend eaeh a|id every hearing at Jcgdclpur. That father of the ^etitioner being aged 66 years is an old person and[ suffering from heart ailment and it is not possit^te for him to sccompany the petitioner to Jogdald\ur or\ each and every hearing.^' • XI-HC-78 sn^T^rf^rigT cWsn^Tsbtfich f^ ^ ^A</ h^ 3%T •<ll<liy<l,®Tfltf'|s,Rtdiy^<, S^-c.c. \ 3lf^- fll*<PfT»>*11<*> ^200^ 3<|^| 'oicti (•jc»F^s|^eT) SRITW (lf?cr-W^T a' Q lodgejd A report wos Jagdalpur regarding the respondent-i for security at the Jagdatpur. Learned counsel for the Sumrfa Sinoh v. ^umar Saniay by the petitioner at P.S. threats and ill-behaviour by husttand tsherein she has prayed time of attending Court <rt |applicant placee! reliance on AIR 2002 SC 396. anVI anofher Considering the convenience of ^ importance in such matters, I anl fhe facts and circumstances of tHe is expedient in the ends of justic^ (Herald Vinay Nadan v. Smt. Vars| of 1 Additional District Judji transferred to the Court of Dis'l accordingly. M.C.C.No.347of2CX36isat Certified copy as per rules.l <oi<iFci41-t tii*<ciT^fe^t<Ri'wi< ^isri^iT^n^r e wife, which <s of paramount of the consirfered opinion. in case indicated above, that it that Case No. 71-A of 2006 ia Rani N(g) before the Court |e, Bastar ot Jegdalpur be •rict Judge, Raipur. Ordered llowed. Sd/- DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh ' Judge P.T.O. »-