..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1198 OF 2007 IN S.C.NO.407 OF 2005 Sunil Raghunath Shetty ...Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.Aniket Vagal i/b. Ms.Anjali Patil, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.S.R.Shinde, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 18th April, 2007. DATED : 18th April, 2007. DATED : 18th April, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.301 of 2004 of Nagpada Police Station. The said case is mainly under Sections 461, 467, 471 of IPC. 3. It is the prosecution case that the applicant on the basis of forged documents took loan from the State Bank of India for which he mortgaged a flat. It is further found that prior ..(2).. to this the flat was mortgaged with UCO Bank. 4. The material on record clearly shows that the applicant obtained loan from State Bank of India on the basis of forged documents. Besides the present case, the applicant is involved in two other cases of similar nature. In one case he has been granted bail and in the second case trial is going on and some witnesses have been examined. 5. Looking to all these facts, I am not inclined to grant bail. Application is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)