VIQNI dO NouniusNoo 3Hi jo 95S ^^^uyv yaaNn Nouuad j,raM ('0"0)--IndreH 'l7--I0^39g 'JB§BM A^Aqp^dfi pX^puo^Q -^d 'u^q^su^g U^L[S^TL[SBJJ m^Av UBpuBsnuv p^p rnipy 'JO^OQJTQ ^UB^SISSV ^HJ/ (•0-0) -jB^sieg '^SIQ 'I^qso^ ^BABqouBj p^du^p 'JQOIJJO 9Apno9xg j^iqo oqj, (-O-O)-J^s^g •^sia 'jnd^Bp§ap ^BABqouBj ^ITZ 'J99UT§u3 QApnooxa joiqo oqj, ('O'O) Jndrey UBM^qg *S'^I'Q ^uom^jBdoa ^u9mdo{9A9Q ^Bjny pua ^ABqouBj AjB^^joog qgnojqj, <qjB§sin^qq3jo s^tg •^ ..,,-"\'s<'~?'.-: .^ ^v ' ,,^^ -•••°".,..^"^^' ,,,.,^v ...c^ ^...-•" ^s^ ^<<^-v/' N<\' s^uopuoas^ (•0-0) -JQ^UB^I '^STQ 'jndjBqjB^j ^ooyg Bio^siBqs nq^a 9§^IUA O/H (•0-0) -jB^s^g 'nsiQ 'p^qso^ ^ABqouBj ;Bdu^p 'BJOUBqQ UJBjqSV BXU^^ 'III-§JBA Tiu-t^^I Bqs^iqg 'sjaoX OS ^noq^ p9§v ^A^q.feO J^innM fou^p\[ TJL[S o/a ^Aqqfeo B^^^-n^ TTOS/ tn SUSJ^A J9UOpp9J j j-} "ON (STd-M sndsv^Ia iv H^IVOSIIIVHHO So IHHOO HOIH a^9<NOH 3H1 N1 @ U3N38 319NIS HIGH COURT Qy CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HOH'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINKBR DIW^KHS W.P.fSl.NO. 4141/2011 PBTITIONBR Ku. Neeta Gajbhlye versus RESPONDENTS State of C. G. & Others Shri Subash Yadav^ counse! for the petitioner, Shri N.Naha Roy, P.L, for the State, WRIT PBTIT310?I UNOBR ARTICfcB 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF JNDIA ORDER (29.07.2011) Grievance of the petition.er in the present petifcion is that the respondent/authorities are asking him to produce relevajit caet-a certiflcate duly verified from the High Level Caste Scrutiny Committee' but t.he said committee is neither is^uing a requisite form to him nor is reaponding in any manner. Gounsel for the petitioner submite that on the one handy the Committee is not entertaining the petition.er and on the other haiid a threat is -being given by the department to take disciplinary action agairist him. State counse! very fairiy submlts that the caste scnitiny com.mittee woiild entertain. the case".of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order in a.ccordan.ce with law, He submits that the Committee will also issue the requisite form in favour of the petitioner if he approach&s the authority with.in the time frame> Considering the facts and circumatances of the case^ the petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to approach the High Power Caste Scrutiny Committee within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order and in turn the said High Power Caste Scrutiny Committee 'will issue requisite form to the petitioner which would be subniitted by him •within a further period of one -week and thereafter the Committee shall examine the matter and would pass appropriate order in accordance with law wlth.in further period of five months. Needless to say that due co- operation shall be offered by the parties for early disposal of the case by the Committee. Till next six m.onths,, the department will not take any coercive steps against the petitioner for not submitting the caste certifica.te iesued by the Committee. - - - - - ""- Sd/- pritinkerDiwaker Judge