IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 28TH AUGUST 2008 / 6TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 30365 of 2004(M) ------------------------------------ PETITIONERS : ----------------- 1. GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR, VAYALIL VEEDU, KARIYIL, KAZHAKKOOTTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2. RUDRAN NAIR, SREE RUDRAM, KARIYIL, KAZHAKKOOTTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.MUHAMMED SRI.S.VIJI RESPONDENTS : ------------------- 1. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, JALAVIJANA BHAVAN, KOWADIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION SECTION, KAZHAKKOOTTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOBLE MATHEW - R1 & 2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING : WP(C).No. 30365 of 2004(M) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED TO THE 1ST PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 20.02.2004. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT DTD.20.02.2004 EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED TO MANOHARAN NAIR TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD.20.02.2004 EXT.P4: OBJECTION FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT'S NOTICE DTD.25.02.2004 EXT.P5: OBJECTION FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT'S NOTICE DTD.25.02.2004 EXT.P6: THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD.01.03.2004 EXT.P7: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.NO.8057/2004 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM ON 08.03.2004 EXT.P8: COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER DTD.08.10.2004 EXT.P9: COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER DTD. 08.10.2004. -TRUE COPY- P.A. TO JUDGE pac KURIAN JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.30365 OF 2004 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of August, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioners are aggrieved by Exhibits P8 and P9 notices issued by the second respondent. Learned Government Pleader submits that action has been taken by the said respondent only in view of the encroachment. It is further submitted that in case the petitioners have still any grievance, they can approach the first respondent. 2. This writ petition is hence disposed of making it clear that in case the petitioners have still any grievance left, they may approach the first respondent, in which case, the matter will be duly considered by the said respondent, with notice to the petitioners. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. smp KURIAN JOSEPH, J. W.P.(C) No. 30365 OF 2004 J U D G M E N T 28.08.2008