IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH JULY 2008 / 18TH ASHADHA 1930 RP.No. 702 of 2008() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.24288/2005 Dated 11/06/2008 .................... PETITIONER/4TH RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------ ELDO.P.JOHN, EBANEZAR RESEARCH CENTRE AND HOSPITAL, MANIVATTU TOWERS, NEDUGAPRA P.O, KURUPPAMPADY (VIA), ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.GOVIND K.BHARATHAN (SR.) RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER/ ------------------------------------ 1. THE INSTITUTION OF HOMOEOPATHY KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRESIDENT DR.E.G.SATHEESH, S/O.LATE E.G.GOVINDAN NAMBOOTHIRI, AGED 33 YEARS, KARUVELIL ILLOM, THRIKKARIYOOR P.O, KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE TRAVANCORE-COCHIN MEDICAL COUNCIL, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, RED CROSS ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, NIRMAN BHAVAN, NEW DELHI. BY ADV. SMT.A.SREEKALA, ADDL.CGSC FOR R4 SRI. JOBY JACOB PULIKA KANDY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. I.V. PRAMOD SRI. N. RAGHURAJ THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ R.P.NO.702 OF 2008 IN W.P.(C)No.24288 OF 2005 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of July, 2008 ORDER The 4 th respondent in the writ petition has filed this review petition for reviewing my judgment dated 11.6.2008. On a reading of the review petition, I am satisfied that what the petitioner wants is a re-hearing of the writ petition itself, which cannot be permitted in a review petition. In the judgment, I had given reasons for my judgment and I do not think that there is any scope for review of my judgment. If the petitioner is aggrieved by any findings therein, his remedy lies in filing an appeal against that judgment. Therefore, I do not find any merit in this review petition and accordingly, the same is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd