•^^. '¥ S HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETSTIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 2048 OF 2009 U.D. Bhargava. aged about 55 years. S/o Late Shri Motiram Bhargava, R/o posted as Deputy Managing Director, District Union (East), Fore^t Division, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh. through the Secretary, Department of Forest, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). 2. Election Commission of tndia. through the Chief EIection Officer, Stater of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). 3. Chhattisgarh Rajya Laghu Vanopaj Sangh, Forest Division, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). 4. Shri Ajay Gautam, Posted as Assistant Conser/ator of Forest, Bilaspur, Cirole Silaspur (CG). (Writ petition under Article 226 of the CQnstitution of India) Slngte Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. %^ Present:- Shri Matin Siddiqui, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Alok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate with Ms Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on this 20m day ofApril, 2009) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to contest the matter on merit, at this stage. However, learned counsei prays that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation before the respondent authorities within a period of three days to consider his ease in accordance with law within astipulated period. 2) Shri Bakshi, learned Govt. Advocate appearing with Ms Jain, iearned Panel Lawyer for the State. submits that, in the event, a representation js made by the petitioner within a period of three days, the same shail be considered and decided in accordance wjth law, on its own merits. within a period ofthree weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 3) In view of the foregoing. according to Jearned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4) Accordingly, the writ petitlon stands disposed of. Sd/- , _ ^^itaotn