IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.681 of 2010 DINESH THAKUR SON OF SURENDRA THAKUR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SRI KRISHNAPUR P.S. SARAIYA DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MUZAFFARPUR. 4. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, NORTH RANGE MUZAFFARPUR. 5. SRI SUNIL KUMAR, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MUZAFFARPUR. 6. SRI DHIRAJ KUMAR, DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. 7. SRI SURENDRA PRASAD SINGH, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. 8. S.K. NOOR MOHAMMAD INVESTIGATING OFFICER SARAIYA P.S. DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. 9. SRI MUKESH KUMAR READER TO S.P. MUZAFFARPUR. 10. ANIL KUMAR SHARMA SON OF SURENDRA THAKUR OF VILALGE- BISHUMPURA P.S. SARAIYA. DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. ----------- 2 28.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also Mr. Niraj Kumar @ Sahid appears for the respondent no. 10. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State. The prayer of the petitioner is that Saraiya P.S Case no.12/10 registered for the offences is not properly investigated. Learned counsel for the State submits that the prayer of the petitioner is not justified. The police, after making the proper investigation, have submitted the final form. However, the Chief Judicial Magistrate differing 2 with the police report has taken cognizance in the matter. Considering the submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. Accordingly this application is dismissed as infructuous. Amrendra/ (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)