IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2009 / 29TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 2350 of 2009(D) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MOHANKUMAR, S/O.NARAYANA MENON, KARAKKATTU HOUSE, KEDMANGALAM, N.PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM. (NOW RESIDING AT: ARACKAL HOUSE, AMMADOM P.O. THRISSUR). BY ADV. SRI.LIJU. M.P SRI.BHAMA G.NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. INSPECTOR GENERAL, VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ALUVA EAST VILLAGE, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.P.PRAKASH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ....................... W.P.(C).2350/2009 ....................... Dated this the 20th day of July, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner claims title to a property having an extent of 1.30 Acres in old survey No.939/1 (Re.Sy.No.68, 69 of Block No.35) of Aluva East Village. According to him, after he came into possession of Ext.P3 document, on the death of his mother, he made an attempt to pay tax in relation to the same and it was not accepted. He was then told that certain documents have been created in relation to different portions of the property, in favour of different persons. He therefore, requested an enquiry in this regard and filed a complaint before the 3rd respondent, the Superintendent of Police. Going by the affidavit filed by the 3rd respondent, the Superintendent of police, Ext.P5 complaint has been forwarded to the Director of Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau for an enquiry after obtaining orders from the Government, which in turn was forwarded to the District Collector, who is now required to conduct enquiry and filed report. W.P.(C).2350/09 2 2. Having heard learned counsel on both sides, I am of the view that the direction now required is one to the District Collector to see that the enquiry on Ext.P5 originally filed before the 3rd respondent and later forwarded to the District Collector at the instance of the Director of Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau is completed within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is ordered accordingly. Once such enquiry is completed, results thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner. All other contentions of the petitioner are left open. Writ petition is disposed of as above. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs