IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17407 of 2011 MUKESH PASWAN Son of late Chet Narayan Paswan, resident of village Panchrukhi, Police Station Khijar Sarai, District Gaya … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR… .. OPPOSITE PARTY For the Petitioner: Mr. Krishna Chandra, Advocate For the State : Mr. U.S.P. Singh, APP ----------- 2 20.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Section 364(A)/34 Indian Penal Code. As per the allegation, a 14-year young boy was kidnapped and demand of heavy amount of ransom was made, however, the victim boy was released later. The statement of the victim boy has been recorded under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and he has named this petitioner and three other persons. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that co- accused Pradeep Kumar Singh and Lokesh Kumar alias Lokesh Ranjan have been granted conditional bail by a Bench of this Court, a copy of which has been appended as Annexure 3, and they were directed to be released on bail 2 after framing of charges. Learned counsel further submitted that the charges have been framed as per the order dated 25.04.2011, appended as Annexure 4. He has also submitted that after framing of charges the aforesaid two accused persons, who are on similar footing, have been granted bail. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, I direct the petitioner, MUKESH PASWAN, to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya in connection with S. Tr. No. 20/11 arising out of Muffassil Police Station Case No. 160/10, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with him. If, after his release in this case, the petitioner is again found implicated in similar nature of cases, then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. SC (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)