1 #5 % 06.05.2011 Present: Petitioners in person witli Mr.SunnitClioudliary, Advocate. jvir. Sunii Sharma, APP for the State/respondent No.l with ASI Jai Pral<ash, P.S.AIipur, the investigating Officer. Respondent No. 2 in person. +Crl.M.C. 1226/2011 & CrI.M.A. 4475/2011 This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seel<ing quashing of FIR No.277/2007 under Sections 452/506/323/427/34 IPC registered at P.S. Alipur on the complaint of the respondent No.2. Petitioners are identified by their counsel Sh.Sumit Choudhary, Advocate. Respondent No.2 is identified by the Investigating Officer ASI Jai Prakash, Police Station Alipur. , Ground for seeking quashing is that the incident took place on some minor disagreement, which resulted in registration of FIR. The parties have amicably settled the matter with the intervention of friends and well-wishers and 1 now, there is no dispute left between them. It is submitted that the respondent No.2/complainant does to wish to have any action against the petitioners on his FIR pursuant to the settlement arrived at between the parties. Compromise deed containing the terms and conditions of settlement is placed on record, which bears the photographs of petitioners as well as the respondent No.2 and duly signed by them. Petitioners as well as respondent No. 2 have filed additional affidavits confirming the compromise deed and their having arrived at settlement. Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified Respondent No. 2 states that the he has amicably settled the matter with the petitioners and now, there is no dispute left between him and the petitioners. Thus, he does not want any action against the petitioners on the basis of his FIR and he has no objection if the FIR is quashed. Learned APP appearing for the State submits that in view of the settlement arrived between the parties and also taking into account the nature of the offence, State has no objection if the FIR is quashed but there is one reservation that the FIR, apart.from the petitioners have named one Sumit as an accused, who is not a party to these proceedings. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Sumit has since expired about nine months back and his Death Certificate has already been placed on the Trial Court record. Respondent No. 2 also confirms this fact and he states that he does not want any action against either of the accused persons named therein. Since the parties have amicably settled the matter and now there is no dispute left and taking into account that the petitioners have no previous criminal record, I feel that no useful purpose shall be served in keeping the FIR and the proceedings arising out of the same alive. Accordingly, FIR No. 277/2007 under Sections 452/506/323/427/34 IPC registered at P.S. Alipur and the proceedings arising out of the same are quashed. Petition stands disposed of. (AJIT BHARIHOKE) JUDGE MAY 06, 2011/akb