a E F coUW" ¥ CF0000110113 / EN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHY$ PRADESH AT JABM?UR MISCJETITION No .w/ms'z. Madhya Pradesh Griha Nirman Mex-a Manda; éolony, E/5, Bitthal Market, BHOPAL (M.P.). yETmxONER: V9? suS w RESpONDENTs: KS» 1. stateiof Madhya Prades-h, Through: The Secretary, vauabh Revenue Deparment, Bnawan, BHOPAL (M.P.)). Nye/{w of Pu”w/a nnexure: Ng‘g. The Commissioner (Revenue), Raipur Division, BAIPUR (M.P.). x vaale erHG Jabzdput e‘ ‘C'Gl’lecter m “ma. 1 ." The Land Acquisition ‘0 ffiégi; , RAIPUR (Mo? . ) . Shri Sangram Singh, Dy.C011ectox-, Pawmiv m1) Udaya Sahakari’ Griha Nirman Santha RAIPUR Limi (M.P ted: . ) 3 kwVw Nagw Mst.$una Wd/O.:Atasi. Khor Baku-a, s/o.Heerasingh Tiju, s/O.Heerasingh. Chandrabhaga, W/0.Nankuram. sonai‘nal, S/o.Ba1chandr' So narinbai , W/o. Nathu. Hathiyarinbai, w/oJharm Jagdish Father éuardian, minor, through: Banau, S/°.Barh A B n- g auxji, minor, throti’ Father 3 ’.7 i Qfi‘icer ag‘ ‘ Adg G EréWfT ""’ - h m h E \P 16. Udairam, s/o.Chetu. S 17. Tulu; s/°.Chetu. 318. Hirai, s/o.Chem. .19. Saguna, Wd/o.£mru. \S 20. Msamal, s/o.Bodama1. 21. Anandram, S/o.Fakirsingh. .g 22. Chintaram, s/o.Suka1u. 23. Mekhram, s/0.-Suka1u. j 24. Damodar, s/o.Hariram, . Through: Mothger Guardian: Brajbai W/°.Ha1‘ir'am. ‘3‘‘25. Jagdish, s/°.Kartik. S 26 . Gangabai , w/o .Jageshwar . £ 2?. Gbwardhan, s/o.Ba1makhu. «x? 28. Somaru, s/o.Jodhu. Pyarelal, s/0.BOdhi. Bulaki, s/O.Bodh1. Chamru,‘ s/o.Sumersingh. Nizam, s/°.Sumersingh. Bodhi, s/o.Bisha1. Jhaggaram, s/°.Har1ram. Sitéfam , s/o . Haril‘am. Bi rambai , S/ooMahru- Mahasingh, s/o.iBen1. KhumanSingh, s/0.Bamashr§y; Lami Trus t Raipur I ndus tries , Raipur (Mtp a ) t ' Pannalal, s/°.Purushottam Das, Nathani, Through: Lami Trust Baipur Industries, RAIPUR (M.P.). W Phulbai, Through: Lami w/0.Panna1a1 Wust Raipur Nathani, Industries, r MIPUR (M.P.). x . _ . . , n .. iV .w‘*_ - . .7 .. 5 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 3490 of 1987 PETITIONER Madhya Pradesh Grih Nirman Mandal. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Madhya Pradesh & Others. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that nothing survives in this petition for adjudication as the petition has become inh‘uctuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side do not controvert the above submission. I 3. In view ofthe above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become innuctuous. Sdl- V , /, 7 Satish K. Agnihotri Judge SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Em; r K‘n/L Present: Shri Sanjay Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State. Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate for the respondent No. 11. O R D E R (Passed on 08d; day ofDecember, 20 1 1)