1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 327 OF 1996 (Arunkumar Keshaoraoji Vitonde .v. Panjabrao Krishi Vidyapeeth Akola and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri Bhushan Mohta, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. P.D. Rane, Advocate for respondent No.2. Shri N.W. Sambre, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 and 4. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 02ND AUGUST, 2010. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Learned Counsel for respondent No.2, at the outset, invited our attention to the judgment and order dated 28.06.2006 passed in Writ Petition No. 1509 of 1991 and submitted that in view of the said judgment, nothing further survives in the writ petition. The said Writ Petition (WP No. 1509/1991) was filed by the very same petitioner challenging the order dated 01.06.1991 issued by respondent Nos.2 and 4 appointing one Shri D.H. Ulemale on the post of Assistant Professor. The appointment of Shri Ulemale was made since, according to respondent Nos.2 and 4, the petitioner was not possessing the essential qualification required for his selection on the relevant date. The petition was ultimately allowed and respondent Nos.2 and 4 herein were directed to issue appropriate appointment order to the petitioner in the place of Shri D.H. Ulemale and to pay the consequential difference/arrears to the petitioner. Having confronted with this, learned Counsel for the petitioner has not disputed that the prayers in the present writ petition have become infructuous. In view thereof this petition is disposed of as infructuous. Rule is discharged. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.