Mpt FA No.1895/10 FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE FIRST APPEAL NO.1895 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr.K. Dhavan i/b Dinesh B. Gupta for the appellant. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATE : 3rd March 2011 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. This appeal is directed against an order dated 19 July 2010 passed by the Commissioner under the Workmen’s Compensation Act and Judge, 5th Labour Court, Mumbai rejecting the appellant’s application for condonation of delay in making an application for setting aside an ex-parte judgment and order dated 14 November 2009. 3. Section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act 1923 provides that an appeal shall lie to the High Court against the orders mentioned under clauses (a) to (e) of sub-section (1) thereof. The order refusing to condone delay is not an appealable order under section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Hence appeal is misconceived and is dismissed. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)