Civil Revision No. 2943 of 2009 -1- *** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2943 of 2009 Date of decision: 21.05.2009. Surinder and others Petitioners Versus Ram Lal and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Brijender Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The petitioners-objectors are sons and grand sons of judgment debtor Ravi Dutt. There was litigation between Ravi Dutt aforementioned and the decree holder. The litigation between decree holder and the judgment debtor since the year 1996 ended in favour of the decree holder. The suit filed by the decree holder was decreed in the year 1999. The First appeal filed by the judgment debtor was dismissed by the First Appellate Authority, vide order dated 28.8.2003. The Regular Second Appeal filed by the judgment debtor was dismissed by this Court on 21.8.2006. The objectors are none else or other than the sons and grand sons of Ravi Dutt judgment debtor. The learned Trial Court very appropriately held that the objections raised by the petitioners-objectors to the validity of the impugned decree are invalid. It is too late for the petitioners- Civil Revision No. 2943 of 2009 -2- *** objectors to raise a plea that the property in question was ancestral in the hands of Ravi Dutt qua them and he could not alienate it as a Karta. In view, thus, of the fact that decree holder won the battle right upto this Court and also in view of the fact that petitioners- objectors are none else or other than the sons and grand sons of judgment debtor Ravi Dutt, it is apparent that there is no force in the petition which shall stand dismissed in limine. May 21, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge `