1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 499/2011 (Smt. Malan wd/o Shrawan Nagapure & others VERSUS Suresh V. Hawale & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M.N. Ingley, counsel for the petitioners. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 2 , 2011 . Heard. The only submission made by the petitioners for challenging the order passed by the Executing Court on 26.11.2010 is that the decree holders had not established the identity of the suit property and unless the said was established, the decree could not have been executed. The submission made on behalf of the petitioners is liable to be rejected as the suit was decided in favour of the decree holders in regard to Survey no.500/1-A of area admeasuring 0.58 HR. The judgment in this regard had attained finality. The village map showing the subdivision of survey no.500 was filed on record, from which, it could be very well gathered that the suit field Survey No.500/1-A was a distinct block and totally different from 500/1-B , 500/2 and 500/3. Further, the Executing Court observed that the suit field had been properly described and identified in the pleadings. In such circumstances, the Executing Court rightly held that the said question could not have been raised by the 2 judgment debtors under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Executing Court rightly rejected the objection filed by the petitioners. Since the order passed by the Executing Court on 26.11.2010 does not suffer from any error, the same cannot be interfered with, in exercise of writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is devoid of merit and is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE APTE