¢n HEGH €0URT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILAsmiR Writ Petiiion (5} No. 888 of 2W8 Petitioners \._ V Bhagwat Prasad Sinha. sic. Shri Jagatram Sinha age abaut 54 years, Asst Teacher, Govt Schaof‘ Gheena. Dist. Burg (CG) 2) Diyali Des J’nariya, Sic. Shri Pvare Lai J‘nar‘aya Age abaut 5D yams, Head Master, Gmrt. Boys Primary Schcol, Sada DEst‘ Katsirdham ((3). Vefsu$ q Respondents 1) State Gcvt. of Chhatt§sgarn through Secretary, I.“ Educatien & Tribai Department, BKS. B'navan, Raipur (CG). 2) DistrictEducaticn Officer, Distr. Durg(CG) 3) Black Educaiion Gmcer, iack Saza, Dist Kabirdham (CG), {Writ Petition under Artlcie 226 of the Ccnstitution of 'mdia) SB: Hon’bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri SomkantVerma, counserfarthe petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Govt. Advocate forthe State. ORAL O§DER reassed on 11‘“ February, 2008) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioners submits that this matter is squareiy covered by the order dated 27-6—2667 passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No, 3566 of 2067 ( Loknath Patel Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others). 2) Learned counsei appearing for the respondents/State submits that in absence of the appointment order‘ it cannot be verified asto whether the cases of the petitioners are squareiy covered by this decision or not Learned counsei further submits that in the event, the case is covered by the decision in the matter of Loknath Patei (supra), the'petitioners may be entitied to the same reiiet'. 3) in view of foregoing, the petitioners are at iiberty to make a representation pointing out the dates of appointment and how the same is covered by the decision of this Court in the matter of Loknath Patel (supra). 4) Accordingiy, the petition is disposed oft u.«w $