IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI THURSDAY, THE 1ST JULY 2010 / 10TH ASHADHA 1932 Mat.Appeal.No. 171 of 2006() ---------------------------- OP.822/2003 of FAMILY COURT, THIRUVALLA .................... APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 2 & 3 IN O.P. --------------------------------------------------- 1. MADHAVA KUKRUP, AGED 65 YEARS, NELLIKOMATH HOUSE, KURAMBALA VILLAGE, MUTTOM MURI. 2. RADHAMANI AMMA, AGED 54 YEARS, W/O. MADHAVAN KURUP, NELLIKOMATH HOUSE, KURAMBALA VILLAGE, MUTTOM MURI. BY ADV. SRI.S.JAYAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT : PETITIONER IN O.P: --------------------------------- SMT. MANJU RANI, D/O.DAMODARAN NAIR, AGED 27 YEARS, NADUVILETH HOUSE, ANICADU MURI, ANICADU VILLAGE. ADV. SRI.V.G.ARUN THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ********************** C.M.Appl.No.1142 of 2006 & Mat.Appeal No.171 of 2006 ********************* Dated this the 1st day of July, 2010 ORDER/JUDGMENT BASANT, J. The learned counsel for the petitioners/appellants submits that the decree has already been satisfied by proceeding against the 1st respondent in O.P.No.822 of 2003, ie. the son of the petitioners/appellants (ie. the husband of the respondent/claimant. In these circumstances, the learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants do not want to prosecute the petition for condonation of delay and the Matrimonial Appeal. Accordingly the petition and the Matrimonial Appeal are dismissed as unnecessary now and withdrawn. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) rtr/