CWP No.17142 of 2009.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.17142 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.12.2010 **** Parveen Kumari . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab and others . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Surinder Kapoor, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. H.S. Brar, Addl. AG Punjab Mr. Amit Singh, Advocate for respondent No.3 ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 06.11.2009 (Annexure P3) whereby her services as ETT Teacher have been terminated presumably on the plea that respondent No.3, who was higher in merit and belongs to the same (reserved) category to which the petitioner belong, was wrongly denied the appointment. (2). It is pointed out by learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent NO.3 that the selection itself has now been set aside. (3). That being so, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Municipal Council, Goniana Mandi to initiate a fresh selection process as early as possible and preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The petitioner shall obviously be entitled to apply afresh and compete for the subject post. (4). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. CWP No.17142 of 2009.doc - 2 – 01.12.2010 vishal shonkar (SURYA KANT) JUDGE