IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.11095 of 2009 Between: 1 Chandrakanth S/o. Ramulu R/o H.No.14-11-731, Ghansi Chowk Hyderabad. 2 Jallagari Narender S/o. Harischand R/o. H.No. 13-5-577, Malai Math, Asifnagar, Hyderabad. 3 P. Durgesh S/o. P. Ashok Gowri Shankar H.No. 6-4-42, Bholakpur, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 4 P. Nageswara Rao S/o. P. Balaji R/o. H.No. 5-5-610, Malakunta, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Commissioner, Endowment Department, Tilak Road, Hyderabad. 2 Dr. Arvind Kumar L. Ganeriwal S/o. Not known to the Petitioner R/o. 13-1-1/24, Seetharambagh, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of respondent No.1 in disposing of the petitioners application and reminder dt.30-5-2007 and 25-7-2007 as illegal, irregular, arbitrary and violation of Arts. 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to declare the petitioners as tenant of Sri Seetharam Maharaj Samastan, Seetharambagh, Hyderabad and issue lease of the land occupied by the petitioners by fixing a reasonable rents from the petitioners and take the same as a Endowment tenants. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.S.S.PERVAIZ Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS MR. P. YADAGIRI RAO MR. CH. SATISH KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER: When the matter was called on 22.07.2009, none appeared for the petitioners and there was no representation, and, therefore, the matter was directed to be posted today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter is called, none appears for the petitioners and there is no representation. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 23rd July, 2009 IBL