(2N W5 / W w c? I“H”Hilllllllllllllllmllllll BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH LOURT OF CHHATTISGARH V AT BILASPUR gmgka aanch W.P. Cr. No. $6663 2010 Rajendra Kumar Jain, S/o, Lal Chand Jain, Aged about 55 years, R/o, Station Petitioner Headquarter, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Superintendant of Police, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) Thana Incharge, P.S.- Mohan Nagar, ‘ Durg, District Durg (C.G.) Thana Incharge, P.S.- Padhmanabhpur, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) Suresh Mittal, Aged about 52 years, R/o, M.I.G. 73, Padmanabhpur, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 4% v.” “mg \ Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Home (Police), Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C,G.) Inspector General O'f Police, Police Headquarter, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Director' General Of Police, Police "7‘; 9/ ‘ w :mw m W WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 22 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF C 'WRIT PETITION gCr! NO. 2583 OF 2010 (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State /respondent No.1 to 6. ORDER gORAL) 1S‘ day or Juiy,_201y0) (Passed on this 1. l.A.N0.4, this is an application seeking withdrawal of the writ petition on the grounds stated therein. Learned connsel appearin l 3. It is ordered as prayed for. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. ashok HHATTISGARH : BILASPUR g for other side has no objection. M Sd/-- i SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI Judge” r m,,_, Present :- Ms. Farah Minha}, Advocate for the petitioner. PETITIONER Rajendra Kumar Jain ‘ Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others