^ f:-1-^-3'Z-— IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCG) WRITPETITIONCStNO. f^fcS IIOQS^ WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER ^'''^" ..-" ^y.--"" '^A--"" __ .. B^SPONDENTS ^& -0^1 '.\r--€ uj;^^ e^toA"1 »-»•- A /Trilochaa Nayak, aged about 46 years, son of Shri Gopinath Nay.ak, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Prfinary School Rinkchari, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawari, Raipur (C.G.) /2. District Education Officer - Raigarh (CG) 01. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER HI6H COURTOF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.fSl NB. 123 of2007 Petitioner : Jagatpal Nikunj Versus Respondents ; State of Chhatt'isgarh & ano'ther W. P.tS) bto. 124 of 2007 Petjtioner ; Venudhar Ijardar Versus Respondents ; State ofChhatt-isgarh <& onother W P.15) No. 125 of 2007 Petjtioner Ku. Jeevan AAonjj Xalxo (after marriage Smt. Jeevcn Monju Viswus) ' Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh A others W. P (5) No. 132 of 2007 Petitioner : Clament Kerketta Versus Respondents ; State of Chhartsgarh <& another WP.(S)hto 138 of 2007 Peti^ioner : Oilip Singh Sidar II Versus Resfiondents : State ofChhatt-isgarh <& cnother W. P.CSYNo. 143 of 2007 Petitroner : Trilochan Nayak i Versus Respondents ; State of Chhatt'iS9arh A another W. P.(S)No. 144 of 2007 Petitioner : Kailadipati Nayak Versus Keq^ondents : State of Chhatl'iS9orh & ano-ther 1 W.P.faNo. 146 of 2007 Peti1]ioner : RoopNarayan Ram Versus Re^)pndents : Stnte of Chhattisgarh A another W. PlSYNtt. 148 of 2007 Pefitioner : Rcykunwr Putel Versus Re^ondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh A onother W. P.fSlNo. 152 of 20)7 Pefi1|ioner ; Shyaffl Mohan Mayak 1 Vtersus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh & onother I; : . ' . . •• ' . And W. P.fS)No. 160 of 2007 !. : • • ' Petitioner ; Narendra Singh Nayak Verais Itespondents : State of Chhattisgarh A another ^B: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agmhotri. J Present: Shr|i A.N. Bhakta, Advocate for the petitioners (s). Mrs. Anju Ahuju, Deputy Sovernment Advocate, Mr. Arvind l?ey, Panel Lawyer, Ms. Sunitajain, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDER (Pttssed on -this 17t Oay of Jonuary, 2007) Thefotlowing order ofthe Court is passed by SatishK. Agnihotri. J. 1. Leorned c^unsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/resjiondents jointly aibmit 1+iat •rfie facts of the present writ petitions are similar to -that of in W. P. (5) No. 5473/2006 (Rakesh Kuimir Sharma & onother vs. Sta-te of Chhattisgarh & others), which f i- . ' • . • was disposed of vide orderdated 9.102006. They further a.ibmit 1+iat the question of law inwlved isalso the same. 2. In view o-fj the above-storted submissions made by teamed counsel for the partie^ •tftese twit petitions are diaposed of in terms of the order dated 9.10.2006 passed bythis Court in W. P. (5) No. 5473/2006 (Rakedi Kunwr Sharma d ano-ther vs. State of Chhatt-isgdrh d o'thers). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of •thjs oisder be plofeed on record in connected matfrers. 5ubhash Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge s'