1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 129 OF 2009 IN FERA APPEAL NO. 2 OF 2009 Sanjay Rishi .. Applicant vs. Special Director, Enforcement Directorate. Respondent Ms. Ruby Kherade i/b. Little & Co., Advocates, for the applicant. Mrs. S.V.Bharucha, wih Mr. A.S. Rao, Advocates, for the respondent. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 15th February, 2010. P.C. 1. This is an application for review of the order dated 18.6.2009. In the order dated 18.6.2009, the statement of the Counsel has been recorded which the learned Counsel now states that statement of a different Counsel was recorded wrongly. There were orders in favour of the Revenue. Therefore, the order passed on 18.6.2009 was to secure the Revenue in respect of the amount awarded. It is in that context that the statement was recorded. 2. The learned Counsel informs that in the instant case, 10% of the amount has been deposited. However, no bank guarantee has been furnished. In 2 the light of that, we clarify the order dated 18.6.2009 as under :- As the amount of penalty is only a sum of Rs.50,000/- and the amount has been deposited, the question of furnishing further bank guarantee does not arise. 3. In the light of that, the order to that extent is varied. Order accordingly. Review Petition stands disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)