1 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5660 of 2008 Ramesh N. Shah & Anr. .. Petitioners versus Dilip H. Somaiya & Anr. .. Respondents ... Mr.M.S. Kumthekar for the petitioners. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED : 20th August 2008 P.C.: 1. Heard counsel for the petitioner. 2. In my opinion, no interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction is warranted against the interlocutory and discretionary order passed by the court below. 3. In so far as opinion expressed by the revisional court about the maintainability of the revision is concerned, I am in agreement with that 2 view. Besides the view taken by the trial court Judge in the impugned order dated 11th may 2005, the same being interlocutory and discretionary order, no interference is warranted. 3. Besides, the impugned decision is capable of being challenged in an appeal to be filed by the petitioner in the event the suit was to be decided against the Petitioner. No interference in writ jurisdiction is warranted. 3. All questions in that behalf will have to be decided at the appropriate stage. Hence, petition is dismissed. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)