^-^iS..ft • >fffl^t s's&S L 6 ^ . IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(227) No. L° / ' / 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENT ^^••i/ivy-^rSs. ^•^^.^^^^..'•^ ^Msn'.0**'" ' ^•^•••'''"" r1^ »..•-'" s^- ia',\s^ Appal Swami S/o^ N. Achchaiya aged about 42 Years R/o Gautam Nagar, Near Durga Mandir Manch, Supela, Bhilai Durg (CG). VERSUS ^r D. Kanak RaJu S/o D. GurVaiya aged about 40 Years R/o Q. No. 1/03 Street -6, Sector -5 Bhilai Distt. Durg (CG). RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENT PLAINTIFF HIGfflCOlJICT<>E€'MEIA1]3'IS<SAI®AT'^ S.B: Hon'Me Shri PradiantKumarMshra WritPietituBi (227)No. 6691/2010 PETmONER : AppalSwanu Versus • ; . REiSPONDENT ; D.KanakRaju Apoearance: ShriVipinTiwan,c6unsel$)rthep®titioner. WRITPETTrK>]SttJNDERARTICLE227QETHE '•CXWSTn-lITIQNOFINmA' ;/. ' , ORALORDER (22.1I.20IO) The exeGuting coiut lias^ jdjsnussed petitiot^ detrtor's applicaticm fQrfixinglfae mstaMnKnt^payi^^ ofRs.65.,000/- along witfi interest at tile rate of6%; (2) Erom the documents Amiexure P-I filed ia dus wnt petifion, it would q)peartiiat Ifae petiticuier's gross payisRs. 10,319Aper month and after necessary deductions net pay is R&8467^ CQntention <rf^^^^^ petitioner is (hat Ue is repaying instaUmeirt in fhe loan account ofofher IoansandlusnetreceivablepenHontJiisRs.2000, (3) Intfae opimon ofthis coiut, ifthe pet^^ Qbtained so many loans aiid is inot ina position toTepaytheanumnt.heshou himseU" fbr this situation. (•4) The trial court has not oonmutted aiiy iUegality in rejecting petitioner'sprayerfiM-flxingfh^installmmt. (5) There is no substance ih this writ petitiau wlrich feils and is dismissed. Sdll- prashantKumarMishra Judge .i-lpffiS-a-I'n'iSinMSB^hl*1'*^^