IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision 3884 of 2007. Date of Decision: 07st January, 2008... Pahlad Singh ....Petitioner through Mr. S.K.Verma, Advocate Versus Firm Rati Rati Ram Bilas & Anr. ...Respondents through Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT,J.(ORAL) The petitioner – plaintiff is aggrieved at the order dated 25th July, 2007 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Hansi whereby his evidence has been closed. The petitioner – plaintiff moved an application to summon Rakesh and Sat Narain as his witnesses and also deposited process fee along with diet money etc. While Sat Narain PW was duly served, notice sent to Rakesh PW was received back with the report of refusal. However, none of them appeared on the date fixed. Learned Civil Court vide order dated 9th May, 2007 issued bailable warrants to secure the presence of both the witnesses. As is apparent from the impugned order, bailable warrants also could not be executed as the SHO concerned made a report that both the witnesses are working outside City Hansi. Learned Civil Court, therefore, closed the petitioner's evidence after observing that it was his duty to bring his evidence. Notice of motion was issued and in response thereto, learned counsel for the respondents has put in appearance. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I am of the considered view that the petitioner is entitled to at least one more opportunity to examine the aforesaid witnesses, whose presence can be secured by issuing bailable warrants with a specific direction to the SHO concerned to effect service upon both the witnesses, on the petitioner's furnishing their correct addresses. Consequently, and for the reasons afore-stated, this petition is allowed to the extent that the petitioner is directed to furnish correct addresses of both the witnesses within seven days and let thereafter fresh bailable warrants be issued with a specific direction to the concerned SHO to effect service upon the said witnesses. Disposed of. Dasti. January 07, 2008. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE