IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 11th day of December, 2009 Urgency Application No. 3361/2009 In 1st Bail Application No.1133 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Fazla & Another .…. Applicants (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No 295 of 2008, S.T. No. 455/2008, U/s 304-B & 201 I.P.C PS Manglaur, District Haridwar. _______________________________________________________________ December 11, 2009 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the accused applicants. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A. with Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State is taken on record. In view of the grounds mentioned in the accompanying affidavit, urgency application is allowed. Heard on the bail application. Learned Counsel for the accused applicants argued that co-accused Nafeesh, brother-in-law of the deceased has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 18.8.2009. He further argued that no specific role has been assigned to the present accused applicants in the commission of crime. He also submitted that the accused applicants are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased, who were living separately from the deceased and her husband Anish. He also submitted that accused applicants are very aged persons and are suffering from serious ailments and they are in jail since August, 2008. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record and in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicants deserve bail at this stage. Let the applicant Fazla and Smt. Tunni be released on bail on executing a personal bond by each of them and furnishing of two sureties each in the like amount by each of them to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 11.12.2009 PRABODH 2