1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO. 157 OF 2008 Smt. Ratna Parasram Sonwane vs. Smt. Vatsala wd/o Sundarlal Sonwane Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. APRIL 30, 2008. Heard Shri Motghare, Advocate for the appellant – original defendant. The challenge is to concurrent judgments. Suit filed by the respondent for recovery of possession has been decreed concurrently. The challenge to the title of respondent – plaintiff has been found to be barred in view of earlier findings in Regular Civil Suit No. 92 of 1997. No question of law is sought to be raised during arguments in relation to findings recorded in Regular Civil Suit No. 92 of 1997. In para 16, lower appellate Court has considered the evidence of appellant – defendant independently and has found that even otherwise there was no reason to interfere with the findings in respect of title delivered by trial Court. I do not find any perversity in the 2 approach of lower appellate Court. Second Appeal is, therefore, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.