IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 6591 of 2008 Date of decision: December 9, 2008 Sunil Kumar & another --- Petitioners Versus State of Punjab & another ---- Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashutosh Mohunta Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta Present: Dr. ML Sachdeva, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. BS Chahal, DAG, Punjab. Ashutosh Mohunta, J (Oral). Counsel for the petitioners states that during pendency of the present writ petition, merit list has been published by the respondents, wherein name of petitioner No.1 figures, whereas petitioner No.2 does not fall therein. As such, according to the counsel, the writ petition qua petitioner No.1 may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, whereas the same may be dismissed qua petitioner No.2. We order accordingly. [Ashutosh Mohunta] Judge [Rajan Gupta] Judge December 9, 2008 `ask'