*1* wp.1987.11.937.sxw kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1987 OF 2011 Subhash Shahaji Bhosale. ..Petitioner -Versus- The State of Maharashtra and others. ..Respondents .......... Mr.R.V. Bansode, for the Petitioner. Mr.A.I.Patel, AGP, for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5/State. .......... CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date : 29th June, 2011. P.C.: 1 There is no reason to interfere with the orders in the RTS proceedings merely because the Petitioner apprehends that despite filing the civil suit and obtaining interim order therein, the revenue entries have been changed. All that the revenue authorities have done is on the basis of the sale deed in favour of the Respondent No.7-Samadhan Abhimanyu Bhosale. The fact that the Respondent No.7 is also party to the civil suit instituted by the present Petitioner, is not disputed. That there is interim order in the said civil suit is also not disputed. However, the revenue authorities have proceeded on the basis that the suit is yet to be decided finally and the legality and validity of the sale deed is not adjudicated till date. 2 In such circumstances, the revenue authorities took cognizance of the sale deed. Whatever exercise is undertaken is always subject to the final adjudication in the civil suit. The suit shall be proceeded uninfluenced by the orders and directions of the revenue *2* wp.1987.11.937.sxw authorities and whatever is done by them. The civil court is not prohibited from passing any order so as to take care of the Petitioner’s apprehension that the property will be sold out. Further, the civil court shall decide the suit on the basis of the oral and documentary evidence before it and without being influenced by the observations of the authorities. All contentions of both sides are kept open. In such circumstances, there is no reason to interfere with the impugned orders. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J)