IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CIVIL CONTEMPT NO. 240 OF 2010 Yashwant Singh and another. ….Petitioners. Versus Smt. Saujanya and another. Contemnor/Respondents. Present: Mr. Chetan Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Dinesh Gahtori, Advocate for the respondents. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Mr. Chetan Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. Dinesh Gahtori, Advocate for the respondents. Since the order dated 25.6.2010 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 95 of 2006 (S/S) was not complied with, this contempt petition was filed by the petitioner. Vide order dated 23.6.2011, personal appearance of respondent no. 2 was called by the Court on 27.7.2011, but due to non appearance of respondent no. 2, the following order was passed by this Court on 27.7.2011: “Mr. Chetan Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Dinesh Gehtori, Standing Counsel for the respondents. In spite of the order of the Court dated 23.6.2011, the opposite party no. 2 Sri C.S. Gwal, Director School Education, Uttarakhand, has neither filed the affidavit of compliance nor is present in the Court. List on Monday next on which date the opposite party will appear for the framing of the charges.” Today an affidavit of compliance has been filed by the State, wherein it has been stated that the order of this court dated 25.6.2010 has been complied with. 2 Opposite party no. 2 Sri C.S. Gwal, Director School Education, Uttarakhand is also present in the Court. Since the order dated 25.6.2010 has already been complied with, nothing further needs to be done in this matter. The contempt petition stands disposed of. Notices are also discharged. The petition is consigned for record. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 1.8.2011 Rathour