IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC SATURDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2011 / 29TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22700 of 2011(J) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- EMINENT GARDENS & RESORTS PVT.LTD., HOUSE NO.457 KANAYANOOR, MULANTHURUTHY, PIN-682 314, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR.SHIBU K.ABRAHAM. BY ADV. SRI.RAJU K.MATHEWS RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. THE SUB REGISTRAR, PEERMEDE, IDUKKI-685 531. 2. SUB COLLECTOR, DEVIKOLAM-685 613. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, PEERMEDE, IDUKKI-685 531. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.M.J. RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 22700/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE LETTER NO.A2/6136/06 DATED 18/04/2008 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P2: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 21/01/2010 IN W.A.NO.2080/2009. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 22700 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of August , 2011 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, they intend to purchase 6.1 acres of property in Sy. No.818 of Vagamon Village. It is stated that the first respondent is refusing to accept the sale deed for registration on the ground that the petitioner should produce No Objection Certificate from the Revenue Authorities. It is complaining of the above the writ petition is filed. 2. This question has been considered by a division Bench of this court in W.A.2080/2009, the judgment copy of which is marked as Ext.P2. In Ext.P2 judgment, it has been held that respondents cannot insist on the production of No Objection Certificate from the Revenue Authorities. 3. In that view of the matter, the writ petitioner is entitled to succeed and therefore there will be a direction W.P.(C) No. 22700 OF 2011 :2 : to the first respondent to admit the sale deed evidencing sale of the property mentioned above and register the document, provided the sale deed is otherwise valid in all other respects. 4. However, it is clarified that the registration of the document will not be to the prejudice of the respondents if the property is liable to be proceeded against for any other reason. The writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-