Crl. Misc.No.M- 14851 of 2011. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: September 01, 2011. Crl. Misc.No.M- 14851 of 2011. Mahender @ Pola ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI PRESENT: Mr. Rahul Rathore, Advocate, for the petitioner, Mr.Sushma Chopra, DAG, Haryana. M.M.S.BEDI, J. (ORAL) The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been attributed blow of Kassi from the reverse side on the neck of the deceased Krishan, but as per the post-mortem report the said injury was not the cause of death. It has been urged that on account of said contradiction in the medical and ocular version, the petitioner should be granted the concession of bail. It has also been submitted that histopathology report of heart even has not shown any heart-attack. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and I am of the view that in the present case bail has been prayed for on the ground that the medical evidence which is in the nature of corroborative value does not support the ocular version. At this stage, it is pre-mature to form any opinion whether ocular version could be discarded on account of same being not in consonance with the medical report which is of corroborative value. Faced with this situation learned counsel for the petitioner has requested the liberty to approach this Court again after some evidence has Crl. Misc.No.M- 14851 of 2011. 2 been produced before the trial Court. As the petitioner has been in custody for more than 2 years, the trail Court is directed to complete the trial expeditiously,preferably within a period of 3 to 6 months. Disposed of accordingly. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE September 1st, 2011 tarun sahni