IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32633 of 2010 AMAR NATH ROY @ MUNA YADAV, SON OF LATE DINESH ROY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner is in custody since 17.6.2010 for having misused of privilege of bail and undertakes now to be more vigilant during trial, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of F.T.C. II, Chapra, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 27 of 1994 arising out of Rail P.S. Case No. 55 of 1992 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the brother-in-law(sala) of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of 2 similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the fact that the case is of the year 1992 so that there is no further complication in the matter. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)