rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION MISC.PETITION NO.55 OF 2007 MISC.PETITION NO.55 OF 2007 MISC.PETITION NO.55 OF 2007 IN IN IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.29 OF 2000 TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.29 OF 2000 TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.29 OF 2000 Pradeep S.Mone & Anr. ..Petitioners V/s. Vallabdas D. Raichura ..Respondent Ms. Seema Sarnaik for the Petitioners. Ms.A.B.Kapadia i/b.Daphtary Ferreira & Divan for the Respondent. CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR J. CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR J. CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR J. DATE : 22ND FEBRUARY,2008. DATE : 22ND FEBRUARY,2008. DATE : 22ND FEBRUARY,2008. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : . The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent states that an amount of Rs.3,06,653.95 is admittedly due to the Petitioner and the Respondent agrees and undertakes to pay the same to the Petitioner within two weeks from today. The undertaking is accepted. She further fairly states that in the event of necessary proof being furnished regarding any further amounts being payable, the same shall also been paid. The statement is accepted. : 2 : 2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner fairly states that in the petition the Petitioner has incorrectly demanded payment up to the date of the transfer of the flat in his name. She fairly admitted that the Petitioner is entitled to the amounts only upto the date of his attaining majority. 3. The petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to adopt appropriate proceeings in the event of there being any shortfall. *******