IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI TUESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2010 / 8TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(Crl.).No. 94 of 2010(S) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- JASMI, W/O.MANSOOR, AGED 19 YEARS, V.K.HOUSE, PAYYAKKODU, OYYOOR P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.L.SURESH KUMAR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POOYAPPALLY POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. SHABU KHAN, S/O.IBRAHIMKUNJU, T.V.HOUSE, (THEBAMVILA), PAPALODU P.O., MEEYANA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 5. LAILABHEEGAM, AGED 65 YEARS, W/O.IBRAHIMKUNJU, T.V.HOUSE, (THEBAMVILA) PAPALODU P.O., MEEYANA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.J.MOHAMMED ANZAR ADV. SRI.S.M.ALTHAF FOR R4 &5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ********************** W.P(Crl.) No.94 of 2010 ********************* Dated this the 29th day of June, 2010 JUDGMENT The parties have returned from the Mediator. The matter is not settled. It is submitted that the petitioner has talked to the alleged detenu in the presence of the Mediator over the telephone and the petitioner is now satisfied that the alleged detenu is not under any illegal detention or confinement. However, the parties have not been able to settle all their outstanding disputes. Be that as it may, we are satisfied that the alleged detenu is not under any illegal detention or confinement. No further orders are necessary in this Writ Petition. 2. This Writ Petition is, in these circumstances, dismissed, as agreed. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) rtr/ R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ********************** W.P(Crl.) No.94 of 2010 ********************* Dated this the 17th day of May, 2010 ORDER The petitioner has come to this Court complaining that her husband, the alleged detenu, is illegally detained by respondent Nos.4 and 5, her brother in law and mother in law. He is missing from 03.03.2010, it is complained. 2. Respondent Nos.4 and 5 have entered appearance. According to them, the alleged detenue is not under their detention or confinement. He has gone abroad. In response to specific questions by this Court, the learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 and 5 undertakes to furnish to the Court the address where the alleged detenu is presently available and the phone number at which he can be contacted. Those details shall be furnished to the counsel for the petitioner within a period of 15 days from this date. The petitioner shall have the option to contact the alleged detenu and ascertain for herself whether he is under any illegal detention or confinement. The counsel shall be heard further thereafter. 3. Call on 07.06.2010 for further directions. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) rtr/