IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 14TH BHADRA 1929 WP(C).No. 25645 of 2007(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ C.SHIVADASAN, AGED 70 YEARS, S/O CHELLAPPAN, KOOTTIL HOUSE, SHAKTHIKULANGARA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.JOHN SRI.BROSE JOSEPH NEELIYARA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOLLAM. 2. EDWIN, KOOTTIL KIZHAKKETHIL, SHAKTHIKULANGARA, KOLLAM. 3. MERCY, W/O EDWIN, KOOTTIL KIZHAKKETHIL, SHAKTHIKULANGARA, KOLLAM. 4. THE TALUK SURVEYOR, TALUK OFFICE KOLLAM. R1 & R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR. I.V. PRAMOD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 25645 OF 2007 C = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 5th September, 2007 J U D G M E N T The essential dispute raised in this writ petition is one relating to the boundary of the property of the petitioner and the respondents. This is a matter which requires to be sorted out in a suit to be filed before the civil court. Therefore disposal of Ext. P1 representation is not of any use for the resolution of the dispute raised nor is the 1st respondent competent to decide the issues raised. Hence, I do not find any merit in the request of the petitioner for a direction to the 1st respondent to dispose of Ext. P1. The writ petition lacks merit and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-