IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.684 of 2008 TINKU KUMAR @ GUDDU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04 17.12.2008 Heard. Earlier the petitioner had moved this court by filing Criminal Revision no.1362 of 2007 which was disposed of in the following manner: “No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. This application is directed against the order dated 19.09.2007 passed by the Sessions Judge, Gaya in Cr. Appeal No.116/2007 whereby application of the petitioner for bail under the Juvenile Act was considered and rejected. It appears that the petitioner is facing an accusation under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. I have perused the order impugned. The learned Sessions Judge has given cogent reason for rejecting the appeal preferred by the petitioner. I find no infirmity in the order impugned. Accordingly, this revision fails and is dismissed.” Now the petitioner has again filed second Cr.Revision which according to this court is not permissible in 2 law as earlier the court had applied its mind and dismissed the revision on merits. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)