IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.4139 of 2011. Date of decision : 17.2.2011 Balwant Singh … Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present: Mr.Munish Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gazi Mohammad, DAG, Punjab. Ajay Tewari, J. This is a petition under Section 438 for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.231 dated 30.12.2010 under Sections 307/120- B/34 IPC (later on Section 302 IPC added) registered at P.S. Division No.8, Jalandhar. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that son of the petitioner had got married to the daughter of the deceased against the wishes of both the families and had in fact, been granted protection by this Court. Thereafter, there is a dispute between the girl and boy. As a result thereof, the girl left the boy. It is subsequent that of the incident has taken place where the boy is alleged to have pushed the father-in-law and have killed him. There is no allegation against the present petitioner. Learned State counsel on instructions from SI-Harbhajan Singh accepted this fact and has argued that father was also guilty of having committed the office along with his son. In the circumstances and without commenting on the merits of the case, present petition is allowed. I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to his furnishing personal bond and surety to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer as envisaged by the provisions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. ( Ajay Tewari ) Judge 17.02.2011 sd