..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2408 OF 2008 Smt.Madhu Irshad Sharma. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.Ujwal Agandsurve, Adv. for applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 24th July, 2008. DATED : 24th July, 2008. DATED : 24th July, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.321 of 2008 of Malad police station, Mumbai for the offences punishable under section 342, 343, 346, 347, 366(A), 376 read with section 34 of IPC and Sections 4, 5, 6 & 15 of PIT Act. 3. The factual matrix reveals that there is a gang operating in purchasing and selling girls and forcing them into prostitution. The material on record shows that the applicant forced the victim girl into prostitution. The applicant and her ..(2).. associates had confined the victim girl in a room and thereafter forced her into prostitution. In the present case, the investigation is going on hence I do not think that this is a fit case to grant bail at this stage. Application for bail is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)