RSA No.2234 of 2006 Present: Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate **** This is a second appeal against concurrent judgments of the Courts below. Plaintiff-appellant had filed a suit alleging that the open area abutting the eastern side of his house was 24 feet wide road. The respondents had alleged that the open area was a part of their property and was not a road. Both the Courts after considering the entire evidence have held that the plaintiff-appellant was not able to prove the existence of a road. Learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to persuade me that this finding of fact was perverse or could not arise from the evidence before the Courts below. Consequently, I hold that the proposed question of law does not arise in this appeal. The appeal is thus, dismissed. No costs. October 24, 2008 (Ajay Tewari) Sonia Judge