:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO.874 OF 2001 NO.874 OF 2001 NO.874 OF 2001 IN IN IN NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.966 OF 1999 OF MOTION NO.966 OF 1999 OF MOTION NO.966 OF 1999 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.4026 OF 1998 NO.4026 OF 1998 NO.4026 OF 1998 Sunanda Keshav Bhide & Anr. ..Appellants Vs. M/s.I.T.C.Limited & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.A.C.Singh i/b.D.R.Shah for the Appellants. Ms.D.Nagpal i/b.M/s.Nanu Hormasjee & Co.for the Respondent No.1. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 15TH JANUARY,2008 : 15TH JANUARY,2008 : 15TH JANUARY,2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellants and the learned Counsel for Respondent No.1. None appears for the other Respondents. The learned Counsel for the Appellants Mr.Singh states that subsequent to order dated 19th June,2006 in Notice of Motion No.2473 of 2001 whereby ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) was granted and in pursuance thereof it appears that 100 shares have already been transferred in the name of the Appellant. On 26th April,2006, the learned Counsel for the Appellants had made it clear that the Appellants were restricting this Appeal only with regard to 100 shares. Now, in view of the fact that the shares have already been transferred in the name of the Appellant, :2: the said transfer stands confirmed. In view thereof, nothing further survives in this Appeal. The Appeal stands disposed of accordingly. 2. In view of the disposal of the Appeal, the Notice of Motion No.966 of 1999 also stands disposed of. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)