IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY, TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR : PRESENT : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE: N.V. RAMANA COMPANY APPLICATION No.1387 of 2003 IN COMPANY PETITION No.210 of 1998 IN THE MATTER OF COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND IN THE MATTER OF M/S. INDO ROCK GRANITES PVT LTD. (IN LIQN.) Between: M/s. Indo Rock Granites Private Limited (In Liqn.) Rep by The Official Liquidator, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad Complainant Vs. 1. Sri Y.Umamaheswara Rao, 2-2-647/77, Srinivasanagar Colony, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad 2. Sri Y.Phani Raj, 2-2-647/185/11, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad Accused Application under section 454(5) and (5A) o fthe Companies Act, 1956 read with Rule 125 and 132 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 ) praying the High Court to i. Summon the accused and punish them under sub-sections (5) and (5 A) of Section 454 of the Companies Act, 1956 for non-compliance of the requirements of sub-sections (1) (2) and (3) of the said section of the Act; and ii. Order the cost of this application to be borne by the accused jointly and severally. The Application coming on for hearing upon perusing the Judge’s summons and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the orders of the High Court dated 16.10.2003, 13.11.2003, 11.12.2003 and 28.1.2004 and made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.M. Anil Kumar, counsel for Official Liquidator on behalf of the complainant. The Court made the following: ORDER: “A-1 and A-2 are present. They filed C.A.Nos.109 & 131/2004 for recalling the warrants. Applications are allowed and the warrants issued against A-1 & A-2 are recalled. 4 weeks’ time is granted for filing statement of affairs. Post on 4.3.2004. A.1 & A.2 are directed to appear in court on that day.” Sd/- E.Umamaheswara Rao JOINT REGISTRAR .//True Copy// SECTION OFFICER //2// To 1. Sri Y.Umamaheswara Rao,2-2-647/77, Srinivasanagar Colony, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad 2. Sri Y.Phani Raj,2-2-647/185/11, Bagh Amberpet,Hyderabad (1 & 2 BY SPL. MESSENGER) (WITH A DIRECTION TO APPEAR BEFORE THE HIGH COURT ON 4.3.2004) 3. one spare copy D/KG T/chvr* compared by: HIGH COURT N.V.R.J DATED: 5.2.2004 NOTE: POST ON 4.3.2004 ORDER C.A.NO.1387 OF 2003 IN C.P.NO.210 OF 1998 DIRECTION HIGH COURT DATE: 11-12-2003 SUMMONS TO ACCUSED NO.2 C.A.No.1387 of 2003 HIGH COURT DRAFTED BY: MSR DRAFTED ON: 12-12-2003 NVRJ DATE: 11-12-2003 NOTE: POST ON 22-1-2004 SUMMONS TO ACCUSED NO.2 C.A.No.1387 of 2003