IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH MARCH 2010 / 19TH PHALGUNA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 243 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.589/2007 Dated 16/01/2007 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. K.UDAYANAN NAIR, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.KARUNAKARAN NAIR, VAVARA VEEDU, CHOOZHAMPALA, MUKKOLA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 044. 2. K.P.VINCENT, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.PONNAN NADAR, WILCENT HOUSE, MOONNAMMOODU, KODUNGANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 013. BY ADV. SRI.AUGUSTINE JOSEPH SRI.K.S.ROCKEY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. K.A.MUHAMMED NOUSHAD, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS NOW WORKING AS THE CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, SOUTHERN CIRCLE, VANASREE, KOLLAM. 2. T.PRADEEPKUMAR, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS NOW WORKING AS DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, VAZHUTHAKAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.ANTONY MUKKATH THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- C.O.(C). NO.243 OF 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT As per the judgment dated 16.1.2007, this Court directed the first respondent to consider Ext.P6 and take appropriate decision and communicate the same to the second petitioner. It is alleging non-compliance with the aforesaid direction that this C.O.C has been filed. 2. When the matter came up for admission, the learned Government Pleader, on instruction, submitted that in compliance with the direction contained in the judgment dated 16.1.2007, Ext.P6 representation referred to therein, was considered and disposed of as per order 2EI/9690/2005 dated 3.3.2010. There was a delay in passing the said order. Considering the fact that the first respondent has already passed an order in terms of the aforesaid judgment, this C.O.C is closed. However, it is made clear that in case the petitioners are aggrieved by the said order dated 3.3.2010, they are free to challenge the same in appropriate proceedings. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc C.O.C NO.243/2010 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. C.O.(C). NO.243/2010 JUDGMENT 10th March, 2010