1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4931 OF 2010 (Shri Taherthai Tasaddeke Badar vs. Harihar Dattatray Bhake & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. OCTOBER 07, 2010. Heard Shri Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner. I find that the alleged subsequent event pleaded in Order 41, Rule 27 of Civil Procedure Code is admitted by the landlord. The learned counsel has contended that the request made in para 15 about non maintainability of suit is not looked into. I do not find anything wrong with the order of the appellate Court. It is open to the petitioner to urge necessary grounds as his written statement is already amended and the subsequent event is accepted by the respondent – landlord. Writ Petition is, therefore, not entertained. JUDGE *GS.