'syl IN THE HIGH COURT QF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR •'?tp.El1ccy3tLEL (In Jajl) P.R. N8 ^^ s"".."."^^:" 9 ^ CnminciJ Revisipn No. ..6'.°.''1..../201-1 1) Mallu. S/o BakkaaRabbary Aged aboul. 70 years, •2) Faja 3/o Mallu, aged about 50 years, Both are Resident of Village Midiyad, Tahsil Anjar, District Bh'uj (Gujrat) 3) Banna- S/o Karan, aged about 40 vea-rs, Re.sident of Varshamani, P.S. Anjar, District Kachcha Bhuj (Gi-yrat) 4) Dha.nna S/o Palaji Rabari, Aged about 43 years, R/o Village Badhro'i, Police Station Anjar, Disl.rict Kachcha Bhuj (Gujrat) VERSUS Ec'SEoridiint State of Chhaftisgarh ThroLigh .-Station House Officer, Police Station Kunda, District FCabirdham -(C.G.) CRIMINAL REVISIQN UNDER SECTtON 397 READ Wni:LSE.CriON_fLOA^2PLTHECQDE9FCRIMINAL PROCEDURE 4-' ,•<•<. f) ;r,Rev.No. 504/2011 1 Mallu s/o Bakkaa Rabbary aged about 70 years, 2 Faja s/o Mallu, aged about 50 years Both are resident of viliage Midiyad, Tahsil Anjar, District Bhuj (Gujrat) 3 Banna s/o Karan, aged about years, Resident of Varshamani, P.S. Anjar, District Kachcha Bhuj (Gujrat) Dhanna s/o Palaji Rabari, aged about 43 years, R/o viflage Badhroj, Police Station Anjar,, District Kachcha Bhuj (Gujrat) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Station House Officer, Police Station Kunda, District Kabirdham (CG) *7 Shri C.R. Sahu, Advocate forthe applicants. Shri R.R. Sinha, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ^ "~-*¥.i^ ^•, '^ CRR 504/2011 t,u, Shri C.R. Sahu submits that charges have been framed in this matter. He seeks permission to withdraw this Criminal Revision with liberty to file another Revision challenging the order of framing of cnaraes. Permission granted. Accordingly, the Criminai Revision is dismissed, as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour ofthe applicants. sd!l'»,sw'n& ^^ ^