^A 0( IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^l!^^.'?.^'^^^^^^^ PETITIONER WRITPETITION N0. IS>I'1~/2004 Y^ ^^ /A^? qt>v/-^.<-- ^/^•'x \y/-%^;--- vW ^^..-•" <-'^ ^ Bisahu Rani Yadav, aged about 54 years, son of Late Shriram Yadav, resident of - Qtr No. 01, Nahar Colony, Tah. Pamgarh, Distt. Janjgir- Champa (CG) VERSU S RESPONDENTS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through : the Secretaiy, Department of Water Resources, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Executive Engineer, Hasdeo Nahar Jal Prabandhan Division, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) The Sub Divisional Officer, Arpa Nahar, Jal Prabandhan, Sub Division No.l, Pamgarh, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (CG) .M—Wiff^. WRIT PETITION UNDER__ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FQR_1SSUANCE OF WRIT' / WRITS, DIRECTION / DIRECTIONS, ORDER / ORDERS IN THE NATURE OFLCERTIQRARI, MANDAMUS PROHIBITION ETC. 01) PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER:- As per the cause title. 02) PARTICULARS ABOUT THE RESPONDENTSS:- /'/•,.^AsT.pe^tie cause title. ^W^. -sg ?'"~s. 1 f^-^, I; ^isf^;fiyy>i V''. .£* \. ^-// }v&^f/ '^caie'8^ say.TSS' "^Y HIGH COURT OP JUDICATURE Ct+IATnSQiARH: BLASPUR Sinde Bench : Satish K Aanihotri. J VW?1T PET1TION N0. 1914 of 2004 Bisahu Ram Yadav Verous State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PBT1TION N0. 756 of 2003 Sevak Ram Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Othors W J REnTION N0.2237 of 2003 Teji Lal Kurmi Vorsus State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PEnTION N0.1271 of 2004 Kashiram Dheemar Vorsus State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PE71TION N0.1698 of 2004 Ledga Ram Rawat Versus 1 r State of Chhattisflarh & Others :tl II ^>. WRIT PETinON N0.1709 of 2004 Panchu Ram Voreus State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION N0. 1766 of 2004 Paras Dhoowar Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PET1710N N0. 2276 of 2004 Fekulal Sahu Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION N0.3612 of 2003 Parsu & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarti and others WRIT PCTITION N0.1607 of 2002 Samaru Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others Mr. Vinay Pandey, Mr. Sunil Ottwani and Mr. S.K. Dadsena, leamed counsel for the petitioner. Present : ffr: ^•Y-s^ Murtl?y> & Mr- p-s- Koshy- teamed Dy. " Advocate Generals with Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava & Mr. Vh/ek Sharma, learned Panel Lawyers for the State of Chhattisgarh. a 'iili -i2 :® ya III :;;:'lli a WSI ^ ORDER (Passed on 15tn September, 2006) The petitionera in this batch of writ petttions are working as casual labour g&ngs. The dato of rotirement was 55 years, as por ciroular dated 09.03.2000. Tho rospondent Stato subsequently by clrcular dated 16.08.2004 Increased the age of retirement from 55 years to 60 years. This Court in W.P. No. 1149 of 2003 has considered this dispute as to whether the casual labour gangs, who have retired on attaining the age of 55 years be glven the beneftt of the circular dated 09.03.2000 for the purpose of retirement on 80 years, and order dated 29.09.2004 of this Court covers squarely the dispute invoh/ed in this batch of cases. Accordlngly, the petltlons are dlsposed of In terms of the order dated 29.09.2004 passed by this Court in W.P. No.1149 of 2003. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge ::.li! s Brajoeh "'^il 'Si ;:ig 'ai 1i's :XBI-:aII