(1) IN THB HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHAATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. ^^tY \2006,S.B. ( Appiication~for restora-6ron~of~appeal u/041 Rule ^r/w_042 R1 APPLICANTS : APPELLANT <$; ^%/ •y /<^\v i-' <^' v ^^- ^'--?• ^ ^'' ^^ IT ^^^ Non-APPLICANTS: RESPONDENTs 7. ^L^c^ 1. Awatar Sing S\0 Harnam Singh Sikh, aged about, 65 years 2. Gurucharan Singh S\o Matwal Singh Sikh Aged about 50 years , Both R\o Budhwari Para, Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3. Kanhaiya S\o Mangatu ( Deft.No.3 dead) Through Legal represantative, Smt. Hemwati Sahu , aged about 60, years W\o Late Shri Kanhaiya R\o Danteshwari Para, dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon ( C.G.) 4. SukhiRam S\o Premlal Sahu , aged about 55 years, Samiti Sevak, Kawardha, Distt. Kawardha ( Kabirdham) C.G. 5. Suman Bai D\o Premlal Sahu , aged about 40 years, R\o Deori,Bhilai Distt. Durg ( C.G.) v/s 1. Suraja Bai W\o Shyama Charan aged about 70 years, R\o Budhwari Para, Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon ( C.G.) 2. Rukhmani Bai D\o Shyamacharan , aged aboutSO years, Luchakipara, Durg, Distt. Durg ( C.G.) ^ (2) Ramkumar S\o Late Shyama Charan ,aged about 48 years, R\o Budhwari Para, Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon ( C.G.) Radhelal S\o Late Shyamacharan Sahu,aged about 46 years, R\o Bhilai Sector2, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Chandrika Bai D\o Shyama Charan ,aged about 40years, R\o Indira Nagar, Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon ( C.G.) Malati Bai D\o Late Shyamacharan Sahu,aged about 41 years, R\o Bhilai Sector 6, Distt. Durg (C.G.) ^< ^^^. Agcawel ^ ^OTARY DUiNKC.G.) }^ 7. Rekha Bai D\o Shyama Charan , aged about 37 years, 8. Revati Bai D\o Shjrama Charan , Aged about 35 years, Both R\o Kalka Para, Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon ( C.G.) All respondents no. 1 to 8 Through counsel Shri Anoop Mazumdar, Advocate, High Court, Bilaspur (represented in S.A. 242\06) 9. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Rajnandgaon ( C.G.) ( Defendant No.3) APPUCATION FOR RESTORATION OF APPEAL UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 19 R\w ORDER 42 RULE 1 C.P.C. XI-HC-78 3TI^T^)T^l<=h cTSTTW^T5h^lch +11+1011 Sh+licb T^T'^TraT^PT, ^Tfl<H4i<o, (®t<ni<yy W\.C.C.^o, ^2-~7/f>^0^ (- ^ 200 3<1^1 ^5icb ^RTTW ^f?cf ^TT^T 05.01.2007 Shri Yashwaat Tiwari, None for fhe responden^ Heard. This appUcation (M.CJ restoration of Second Appeal under Section 100 of fhe Codle is supported by affidavit ofth^ This inatter was disini^! the Menibers of the Chh^.1 themselves from the Court against the action of fhe Stat^ as Law Officers offhe State. Learaed counsel for DI] hundred cases were disniissefl Division Bench of this Cour^, passmg a detailed order date<|l about all fhe cases, which certaio. conditions. His inay also be given to this case| The prayer appears to b( The order of Division perused. For the reasons stated passed by fhe Division c|ounsel for the appUcatits, <=bl<4f€n41T1 HTR^ff ^ fe^ ^RCTT ^)3:rf^T3Tl^T (^. No. 527/2006) has been filed for |No. 242/2006, which was aa appeal of CivU Procedure. This application counsel. i^sed in default on 23.8.2006, when i^ttisgarh High Court Bar absentedL Iproceediags as a niark of protest Govemment ia appomting outsiders 1ph.e applicants submits that about ia default ou the said date aad the r^, headed by The Chief Justice, by 6th October, 2006, restored almost dismissed by fhe said Bench on is fiiat fhe siiiular treatoient w^re subntission B^uch genuiae. passed in M.C.C. No. 495/2006 (n the order dated 6th October, 2006 in M.C.C. No. 495/2006, this BerJLch ^ ^ XI-HC-78 HI*«vrT$tl<4|Ch 3^ •^wi(yi^, y>Tn<ili(o, is)<viiy^< ,^.C.^.^o. ^Z.'7/^^k 200 3TT^?T ^51 cb (yii^qq€T) ^n^T^rf^w cT^T3TT^T$^^ich •-> \|Ct ^ ^<fTW:^f?cf3TI^T 2 appUcation is allowed on the s| have been inentioned ia the The disudssed S.A. No.2^ afor^said origiaal nuinber on the reasons M C.C. ctf <=hl^Fcn4i^ HTR^ff ^*fe^ ^T^K ^3T^T3T1^T ame terms and conditions, which order. ^2/2006 shall be restored to its itated ia fhe order. ^e^^Q^ - Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge y ^