SINGLEBBICH ffv^p 'Ztftf /, IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W.^.JSUffo^ <3?°>'^1 OF 2011. PETITIONERS ^. ^ <^-''> .^ ^^< >' ^/'^?.-- ^0" ^y^- ^" sy ^-- ^'&°' RESPONDENTS ,:1. Vijay Kum.ar Jagat, S/o. Shri DujramJagat, aged about 44 years, Upper Division Teacher, Presently working at Govt. Girls Middle School (U' Baima, Block - Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) r.f»jw^.iv\ ^- tffiiz"' , 2. KamaLtttean-Khare, S/o. Shri Ramdutt Khare, aged about 45 years, Upper Division Teacher, Presently working at Govt. Girls Middle School Baima, Block - Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) V^ER_SU_S ,: 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2. District Education Officer, District Bilaspur (C. G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Block Bilha, Distt.Bilaspur (C.G.) ^4. Joint Director, ^ Treasury Account and Pension, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C. G.) WRIT^ETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioners named above beg to submit as under:- 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS : As given in the above cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: As'given in the above cause title. ^5 i".-'.^£^B=^.' t.y ^'i^-. '% '& ^ XI-HC—78 '^A^ '^f^s^y W*ffff »W^» 7S? "MI-41M1, •ESiT)l<H<IS, f°<dl'Mli< ..U^^]..S\kA<ia!j4l 3^1 '^SK ('j°l)j«<<^T) sn^i w T't-v* 'cfSff 3n^Tsb*fl(») TOnw^fean^i f V.r^VKt9' •S tlUWSlrfK il V5STJl'A&/i£ fflJK* £'1(UTJ Sbri Ajay Barik, counsel fo Shri Yashwaat Singli Thaktir Counsel for the petitioner entifled to benefit of two advsaack increinents on accoiint of he 1>l«ltt1*ilfintRJT <f fetZt <f"lt<;lt ^TaffiiiTsn^r i- the petitioner. ur, Dy. A.O. for the State. subinits that thc petitioner is haviag passed B.Ed. examuiatioij^ before Iiis appoiataient at his owu cost. It is submitted fhat fh^ issue invoh?ed in fhe present petition is no longer res iiitegra fead fhe sarae has been fi-aallv decMed by ffae HonJ"ple Supren(e Court in fhe case of Asha Saxena Vs. State ofM.P. & Ois^ It is farther subinitted thd sunilar view in its order dated Q 6257/2008. Counsel for fhe peti^ order dated 29..4.2010 passed ^ wherein relyiag upon the. judgnj fhe case ofAsha Saxena (supra) Court ui anofher Writ Appeal beeu issued for consideration advance iacrements as per the State of Madhya Pradesh, pleaded in fhe petition. circi.llar [2009 (IHJMPJR (SC) 59. lt this Cozirt ,has also taken a j.2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. fioner further subniits fhat the Writ Appeal N0. 124/2009, of the Supreine Court in and fhe order passed by fbis NO, 87/2009, directions have <1 (if the case for graat dated 21.9.1974 issued by after verification of the facts Counsel for the State sub^iits that case of the petitioner would also be considered on the jsatne lines. ^^. "i35t XI-HC—7S ^ss •*iww<i,www, fsidiyy *(l*fdl tb^HT^t WI, 200 sv^v 'q'ra' (^f^p^i) 3ii^r?nf?mq? ?TSff 3TT^?T so+lf^i | TOnw^ift'ti sn^i In view of above, fhe p^lition is disposed of wifh a direction to fhe respondent aut^iorities to decale fhe claim of fhe petitioner for grant of tw4 advance iiicrements as per circular dated 5.1.2011 (Annex^re P/l) issued by fhe State of Madhya Pradesh after verificati{>n of the facts pleaded in fhe petitfon wittun a period of cight -yeeks fiwm today. ] q>i<i[<n<iii 'wRff A' is<zt <.r«i<^i< ^siRiirgn^r Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge 'r