IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-34276 of 2009 Date of decision: 23.12.2009 Rajesh ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Kuldeep Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Amit Goyal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana Mr. S.S.Kharb, Advocate for respondent no.2. S. D. ANAND, J. The trial in the FIR which is dated 12.1.2004 concluded with the validation of compounding between the parties thereto. The petitioner was, however, left out of compounding exercise as he was overseas and not available for participation therein. It is otherwise common ground that with the compounding of offence under Section 307 IPC, all the offences pending adjudication were compoundable in nature. In the light thereof, the petitioner is relegated to the remedy available to him in the context of compounding before the learned Trial Court. Disposed of accordingly. December 23, 2009 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE