IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35130 of 2008 SAINUL HAQUE @ MD.SAINUL HAQUE Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 25.9.2008. Heard both the sides. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no cognizance under any panel section has been taken. In view of Section 24 of the Bihar Saw Mill Regulation Act, the provisions of Sections 41 and 52 of the Indian Forest Act are also not applicable. The provisions of the Bihar Saw Mill Regulation Act are bailable. Under the facts and circumstances, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail. In that event, court below shall consider his prayer for bail in view of the fact that offence alleged against the petitioner is said to be bailable and pass order in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order of the court. Accordingly, this application disposed of. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)