CWP No. 15289 of 2007 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH * * * * * CWP No. 15289 of 2007 Date of decision : October 20, 2008 * * * * * M/s Nanda Goods Transport Company, Panipat ............Petitioner Versus HUDA and another ...........Respondents * * * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH * * * * * Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.S Longia, Advocate for Mr. Arun Walia, Advocate for the respondents. * * * * * 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the digest? M.M KUMAR, J. The petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of directions to the respondents to refund the excess amount paid by the petitioner on account of compound interest as per their demand on the outstanding dues against the allotment of commercial plot No.181, Sector 25, Panipat. The petitioner has also prayed for issuance of direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 24.6.2007 (Annexure P-4) which is still pending consideration. CWP No. 15289 of 2007 2 It is conceded before us that a similar controversy has been decided by this Court in a bunch of petitions. The main order has been passed in CWP No.3737 of 2007 along with connected matters on 8.5.2007 (Annexure P-3). The Division Bench has issued direction to the respondent to frame comprehensive policy to the effect that it may obivate the chance of any further litigation on the subject matter because some time simple interest is charged and another time compound interest is charged while refunding the amount. The Division Bench noticed that in order to avoid further litigation, the respondents are expected to apply the principal and rate of interest uniformly to all the affected persons. The view of the Division Bench in the concluding para is based on the judgment of this Court rendered in the case of Gian Inder Sharma vs. HUDA bearing CWP No.16497 of 2001 decided on 11.11.2002. After hearing the learned counsel and the consensus reached between them, we dispose of the writ petition by issuing direction in terms of the order dated 8.5.2008 passed in CWP No.3737 of 2007 (Annexure P-3) and other connected matters. Let the needful be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. ( M.M KUMAR ) JUDGE October 20, 2008 ( JORA SINGH ) ritu JUDGE