IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.3512 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.3512 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.3512 OF 2008 1. Vijay Bhimrao Gaja; 2. Shivputra Padappa Ubare; 3. Sanamukha Irappa Mali, 4. Srimant Rama Koli, 5. Kedarnath Mallappa Bahiraja, 6. Mallikarjun Sadashiv Todkari, 7. Sidharam Bhramanand Swami, Applicants Vs The State of Maharashtra, Respondent. Mr B.G.Vaidya, for the applicants. Mr H.J.Dediya, APP for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 06/10/2008 DATE : 06/10/2008 DATE : 06/10/2008 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard Mr.Vaidya, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr.Dediya, learned APP, for the State. 2. Though, prima facie, it was not necessary for the applicants to approach the Addl.Sessions Judge, Solapur, seeking anticipatory bail in view of issuance of the process in a private complaint filed under section 395 of IPC, in my opinion, it may be difficult for the applicants to now approach the Magistrate seeking order of anticipatory bail. In the circumstances, I am satisfied, the following order shall meet the ends of justice. 3. In the event the police decide to arrest the applicants in connection with C.C. No.35 of 2008 filed by one Shidhavva Sanganna Dabre alias Gajja for an offence under section 395 of IPC, the police shall give 72 hours notice to the applicants to enable the applicants to approach the appropriate Court for appropriate reliefs. 4. The application is disposed off. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)