IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2011 / 31ST ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 20068 of 2011(G) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- GEORGELIN MANUEL,S/O.P.G.MANUEL, PALAPARAMBIL HOUSE,PRAMBITHARA CROSS LANE, PANAMPILLY NAGAR,KOCHI- 682 036. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.ABOOBACKER(EDAPPALLY). RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,KOTTAYAM – 686 061. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,KOTTAYAM – 686 061. R1 & R2 BY SRI. T.A. SHAJI, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.20068/2011-G: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD. 20/07/2011 FOR SCRUTINISING THE ANSWER PAPER FOR THE SUBJECT SYSTEMS SOFTWARE FOR THE 8TH SEMESTER EXAMINATION HELD IN MAY-JUNE 2011. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DTD 18/07/2011 FOR SCRUTINISING THE ANSWER PAPER FOR THE SUBJECT SYSTEMS SOFTWARE FOR THE 8TH SEMESTER EXAMINATION HELD IN MAY-JUNE 2011. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD. 20/07/2011 FOR REVALUING THE ANSWER PAPER FOR THE SUBJECT SYSTEMS SOFTWARE. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DTD. 18/07/2011 FOR REVALUING THE ANSWER PAPER FOR THE SUBJECT SYSTEMS SOFTWARE. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 20068 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Tech Electronics and Communication Engineering Course. The petitioner had appeared for the final semester examination and along with the said examination, he had written the subject Systems Software for the VIII Semester. When the result was declared, he had failed in the above paper. He applied for scrutiny and revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the scrutiny and revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the scrutiny of the answer paper within two weeks and the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for scrutiny and revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. W.P.(C) No. 20068 OF 2011 :2 : Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-