1 wp1532.10 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1532 OF 2010 Ms.Amutha D/o Kailasham Nadar- alias Amutha Jaishankar. ....Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & ors. ....Respondents Mr. Murtaza Najmi, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vijay Garad, for Respondent Nos. 3 to CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND U.D.SALVI, JJ DATED:- SEPTEMBER 1, 2010 P.C. 1. Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the FIR being C.R.No. 244 of 2008, registered on 23rd April, 2008 in Goregaon Police Station was outcome of the matrimonial dispute between the Petitioner and the in-laws. The parties have now amicably resolved all their differences. Consent Terms have been filed before the Family Court recording that position. Counsel appearing for private Respondent Nos. 3 to 7 submits that they would concede to the relief claimed by the Petitioner. 2 wp1532.10 2. Considering the fact that the dispute was essentially the outcome of matrimonial discord between the parties, in the interest of justice, the Petition ought to succeed in terms of prayer clause (a). Ordered accordingly. (U.D.SALVI, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)