HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.17311 OF 2009 Dt.24.8.2009 Between: Alluri Subba Raju & Company Rep.by its Managing Partner Sri A.Ashok … Petitioner and 1. The Govt.of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Secretary, Industries and Commerce Dept., and four others … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.17311 OF 2009 O R D E R: Heard the counsel. On 20.8.2009, the learned A.G.P. for Industries had taken notice and requested time to get instructions. The matter is coming up for admission. The writ petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent, in Memo No.16270/SPIU & SAND/2008-1, dated 30.5.2009 and the consequential orders of 4th respondent Assistant Director of Mines and Geology in Notice No.4624/Sand/(R14), dt.31.7.2009 and the notice No.5679/Sand/08, dated 14.8.2009 published in news paper on 17.8.2009 to recover the properties of petitioner under R.R.Act, 1864, as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional, contrary to Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 and A.P.Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966 and in violation of Article 14 of Constitution of India apart from utter violation of principles of natural justice and to pass such other suitable orders. The facts in detail had been narrated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition at paras 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. The order made in W.P.No.17384 of 2009 is placed before this Court. In view of the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the considered opinion that the writ petition be disposed of directing the respondents to treat the notice dated 31.7.2009, as show cause notice, and liberty is given to the petitioner to make fresh representation along with objections to the Committee report before the 1st respondent, within a period of four weeks and let the 1st respondent receive such representation along with objections, hear the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law. In the light of such representation and the objections to be filed by the petitioner in this regard before the first respondent, till then the 4th and 5th respondents shall not take any further steps in pursuance of the proceedings under the Revenue Recovery Act. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. _________________ P.S.NARAYANA,J 24th August, 2009. Note: Operative portion by wire at party’s cost. B/o PNV HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.17311 OF 2009 Dt.24.8.200