IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-24797 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.9.2009 Harpreet Kaur .. Petitioner v. State of Haryana and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. R. S. Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ritu Punj, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. Reply filed by Vinod Kaushik, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Central Faridabad in Court today is taken on record. Prayer in the present petition is for issuance of a direction to respondents No. 2 and 3 to withdraw the protection provided to the petitioner by this Court vide order dated 13.8.2009, passed in Crl. Misc. No. M-22266 of 2009. It was on account of the fact that the petitioner had approached this Court along with Neeraj Sharma claiming that they had solemnised the marriage against the wishes of the parents and family members of the petitioner and were facing threat to their life and liberty from them. Now the stand of the petitioner is that she had not, in fact, solemnised the marriage with Neeraj Sharma and presently she was living with her parents and is not facing threat to her life and liberty. A copy of the application filed by the petitioner to the Commissioner, Faridabad has also been placed on record by the respondents in reply filed to the petition. As the petitioner is not facing any threat to her life and liberty and she does not require any protection, it is directed that protection already provided to the petitioner may be withdrawn. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 17.9.2009 mk