mnm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 01 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 101 OF 1995 Chhaganlal Haribhai Kesur ...Plaintiff Vs. P. Pushparani & Ors. ...Defendants Mr. B.N. Vaishnawa a/w. Mr. Dube i/b. Bharat Vaishnawa & Co., for Plaintiff Mr. B. Saraf a/w. Ms. Pooja Kshirsagar i/b. IC Legal for Defendants 3 & 4 CORAM : SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : 14TH JUNE, 2011 P.C. : 1. The Plaintiff has sought amendment of the plaint. The amendment seeks to challenge a registered Deed of Conveyance executed prior to the suit. Strictly speaking the Plaintiff is taken to have had notice of the said Conveyance and hence the request of the Plaintiff must relate to the date of the suit. Nevertheless upon the claim that the Plaintiff learnt about it later, the Plaintiff has sought to challenge. The Plaintiff must be allowed to plead whatever he deems fit and take up all the contentions in his case. 2. Hence the Chamber Summons is allowed. 3. The Plaintiff shall carry out amendments within 2 weeks. The Plaintiff shall also amend the copy of the plaint served upon the Defendants within 2 weeks from today. 4. The Defendants shall be entitled to file further written statement and to take out proceedings as per law, if any. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.)