IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15655 of 2011 Satya Narayan Mochi, Son of Late Jangali Mochi, Resident of village Kanchanpur, P.S. Bihta, District Patna. ……..Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ……..Opposite Party ----------- 04/- 26/07/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon copy of the case diary up to paragraph nos. 142 dated 31/12/2010. Petitioner is solitary named accused in this case with allegation of withdrawal of money by making false signature of concerned Mukhiya and the amount so withdrawn in the name of the petitioner was not distributed to the teachers which was to be paid towards their salary. It is pointed out that during investigation, it has come that signature of the Mukhiya was not forged rather Mukiya and the petitioner both were joint account holder and signatures were genuine, but nothing could be explained regarding the allegation of keeping such withdrawn amount by the petitioner and its non-distribution. The said Mukhiya, during investigation was also made accused but has already been granted the privilege by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 06.11.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 33504 of 2009, but this is of no help to the petitioner, who is not entitled for the privilege sought. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail of the above 2 named petitioner, in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 338 of 2008, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, is hereby rejected. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)