1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR ORDER S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 6195/2009 Arun Kumar & ors. vs. State of Rajasthan Dated : 19.08.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. Ravi Shankar Sharma, for the petitioners. Mr. Jitendra Kumar Sharma, for the complainant. Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor for the State. This order governs the disposal of bail application filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. by Mr. Ravi Shankar Sharma Advocate on behalf of the applicants pertaining to F.I.R. No. 391/2008 of police station Kotwali, Bharatpur in the offences 498-A and 406 of IPC. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the complainant as also the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has canvassed that the marriage between the complainant and Sandeep was solemnized on 7.12.2002. Since marriage, the complainant has been living with the husband in Tonk. Sandeep died on account of ailment on 7.12.2008. It looks totally improbable that after the death of son, his parents will ask for more dowry. When the son is not surviving, how can the parents of daughter will give dowry that too to her in laws. Just with a view to grab property, the complainant has lodged a false report, hence, the petitioners may be granted indulgence of anticipatory bail. 2 4. Learned counsel for the complainant as also learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail petition. 5. Having considered the submissions made at the bar and perused the relevant material available on record, I, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, feel that it is a fit case wherein petitioners can be granted anticipatory bail and the bail petition is ordered to be allowed. 6. Therefore, the SHO/I.O. Of the Police Station Kotwali Bharatpur is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners namely Arun Kumar S/o. Sh. Girdhari lal; Sheela W/o. Arun Kumar; and Lokesh S/o. Sh. Arun in FIR No. 391/2008 registered in the offences under Sections 498-A and 406 of IPC, he shall enlarge them on bail provided they furnish a personal bond each in the sum of Rs.500/- with a surety bond each in the like amount, to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i) They shall make themselves available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required: (ii)They shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii)They shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. (iv)They will not commit any offence during the period of bail. (MAHESH BHAGWATI), J. Mak/- 15