IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 531 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 531 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 531 OF 2005 Nakhuda Mohamed Ali Rogay. ] .. Petitioner Versus 1.Municipal Corpn. of Gr.Mumbai & 2 ors].. Respondents Mr. Mahendra Bajpai i/b M/s. Ashok Law Firm for the petitioner. Mr. Milind More, AGP, for respondents No.2 & 3. Mrs. P.A. Purandare for respondent No.1. CORAM: R.M. LODHA & A.S. BAGGA, JJ. DATED: 07TH JUNE, 2006 P.C. : . Heard. 2. The counsel for the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai submits that the unauthorised encroachment, as alleged in the Writ Petition, has been removed. She placed on record the photographs prior to demolition and after demolition. Having perused the photographs, we find merit in the stand of the Corporation that the unauthorised encroachment, as : 2 : alleged by the petitioner, has been removed. Nothing further needs to be done in the matter. 2. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- [A.S. [A.S. [A.S. BAGGA, J.] BAGGA, J.] BAGGA, J.]