IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.1071 of 2011 Decided on: Mar. 9, 2011. Ashwani Sharma …….Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …….Respondents. _______________________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr.Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr.R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr.Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General with Mr.J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner is a PTA appointee. He is aggrieved since fourth respondent has been posted and the petitioner has been sent out. In case the petitioner is in a position to point an open vacancy where the fourth respondent is willing to work, the second respondent, in the light of the willingness, shall take immediate action and in the resultant vacancy, the petitioner will be re-engaged as PTA, till he is otherwise replaced by a regular appointee. 2. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice Mar.9, 2011 (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tilak/naveen) Judge.