IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11885 of 2009 MARKANDEY SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.12239 of 2009 SONU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 30.6.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. From a katra, huge quantity of manufactured country made wine, raw materials for manufacturing of wine and machines were recovered. Petitioners have been named as manufacturer after taking the same katra on rent. Both the lawyers representing the petitioners doubt involvement of petitioners in manufacturing of country made wine as there was no material to establish their being tenant of katra. Seizure is not doubted. Confidential information was received by the informant which was to the effect that the petitioners were running business of manufacturing country made wine in katra of Chandrika Sah after taking the same on rent. Storage was found which was sufficient for manufacturing. Confidential report part of which is found true, if can be - 2 - taken to believe under section 60 of the Evidence Act, is a matter of discussion but discussed material was existing there, I find it not a fit case for anticipatory bail. Prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI