W 115m; MD %9H9§4m“ 2 W mgwmm Wwgéhjgm ' DIVIsIbN BENCH: ’ r HON'BLEMR. HON'BLE MR. RAJESH DHmEN§A AR MIsHRA LAL JHANWAR & V JJ ' ' W P No 3607/04 (hi-man U/A 226 f ik‘e Cons?nfuhar of Mdia) PEUTIONER Sure dm Kumar Jam, 5/0 Shrl K.L. Jain; aged abou? 52 years, Occupa‘i‘ion— Con‘r c‘l’or, R/o Oppoéife Ccn‘l'ral Bqnk, AkaLf m, Districf - Janjgir Champa (CG) §E5150NDENT5 1. 3h m sanchqr‘ Nigam L+d.- B.5.N.L. (A ' I 6 1' of India Enterprises) Through A To Exchange Budding, GE Road Vs 3. Bi isiana! Engineer (T x I‘, Bhar-a' S char Nigam. L‘rd, Ambikapur (CG) Di isionai Engineer OFC— Projef), ishe gar, sr (CE) Presem: Mr. Prashan‘ ayaswu r. dvccafe wh Mr. Shilendra Kumar Sharma, Advate fr fh pe‘fioner. Mr. RM. Spurr, olaka Advfe oca for fhe rspoefs endn. h.: (1“ prii, 2009) r ( c r. jkre Na Eihpu h ‘JL 5 A if a oc o e ‘i O R A L O‘R D E ii A w ' Dhirendra Mishra. J: 1‘ The pe‘l’ifioner has filed fhe ins‘ranf pew-ion seeking various reliefs defaiied in paragraph No.7 of +he wrif pe'ri‘l'ion. However. learned ,Senior’Counsel for ‘H'Ie pe‘ri ioner as we“ as learned counse! for The respondenTs J‘oin‘i'ly submi‘r ‘rha‘r ‘l'his pe‘ri‘rion may be disposed of wi'rh a direction ‘ro fhe res ndem‘s f0 refund fhe earnes‘t money of r Rs.1.‘16,700/— deposited by The pefi‘rioner a'r The Time of en'fering . inToxagreemenT wiTh’ iibe y To The peTiTioner To avail oTher remedies as per arbiTr Tion clause No.16 of The ConTracT ’ agreemenT for any damage suffered by The peTiTioner. 2. In View of above submissio of learned pounsel for The parTies, The insTanT peTiTion is dispose of wiTh a direcTion To The respondenTs To refund The earnesT m ey of Rs.1.16.700/- deposifed by The peTiTioner. The peTiTioner is also granTed liberTy To avail oTher remedies as per arbiTraTion Clause No.16 of The ConTracT agreemenT for any damages suffered by The peTiTionerQ Sd/- Sdl- ‘ R.L. Jhanwar Dhirendra Mishra ‘i‘ Judge Judge we? 1