IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5333 of 2009 RAJIV RANJAN SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 21.5.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a police case under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. It is submitted that the FIR itself names the persons who are suspected to be involved in dealing with the Kerosene oil stated to have been seized. The petitioner is not named as one of them. He is only the owner of the tractor being used for transportation and he has been implicated for that. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner abovenamed, surrender in the court below within four weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M. Hilsa in Islampur P.S. case No. 51 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Navin Sinha,J.) A.Kumar