IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 23237 of 2008 Between: K.Ramaswamy S/o Butchaiah, Ganesh Nagar, Mahabubnagar District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 A.P.S.R.T.C rep.by its Vice Chairman & Managing Director Musheerabad,Hyderabad 2 The Regional Manager A.P.S.R.T.C Mahabubnagar,Mahabubnagar District 3 The Depot Manager Narayanpet Depot,Narayanpet,Mahabubnagar District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ,order or directions more in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents in not paying the gratuity amount to the petitioner for his out of employment period 14-6-1986 to Sept 1988 ie from the date of suspension to date of reinstatement as illegal,bad arbitrary and contrary to the judgments of this Hon'ble Court and consequently direct the respondents to pay the gratuity with interest for the said period and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.GOVINDA RAJULU Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.B.G.UMA DEVI The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.23237 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: The learned counsel appearing on either side fairly conceded that the issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this Court i n M.RAMA RAO v. ASST. TRAFFIC MANAGER, APSRTC, CENTRAL BUS STATION, HYDERABAD[1], therefore this writ petition is also liable to be disposed of in terms of the above judgment. In view of the above, following the above judgment, this writ petition is disposed of in terms thereof. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 4.11.2008 DA THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.23237 of 2008 4.11.2008 [1] 1998(2) ALT 534