: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3200 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.992 OF 1998 Shekhar Agarwal ....Plaintiff V/s. Sunita A. Mandelia & Anr. ....Defendants Mr.Rohan Cama with Ms.Pallavi Dedhia i/b Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for the Plaintiff. Mr.A.M. Saraogi with Mr.S.K.Chaurasia for Defendant No.2. Mr.Ajay Farnandis i/b Kanga & Co. for Defendant Nos.3 to 6. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 21ST JANUARY, 2008. P.C. : 1. There is no undoubtedly considerable delay of nine years in respect of this application. Original Defendant no.1 had denied that the property in respect of which the Receiver is now sought belongs to the joint family. Despite that, no application had been taken out for any interim reliefs in respect the said property. There is no valid explanation for the same. Mr.Saraogi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of Defendant No.2 states that now the Plaintiff is managing the said property. There is no affidavit in : 2 : reply. The present order is passed only in view thereof. 2. The Plaintiff shall not create any further tenancy rights of any part of the property referred to in prayer (a) of the Notice of Motion without the leave of the Court. All the contentions between the parties in this respect are kept open. Any application for leave shall be made only after the notice to all the parties. The Plaintiff shall within eight weeks from today furnish the details of the tenancy rights, if any, created in respect of the suit property and furnish a copy of the affidavit to the advocates of the other parties. Mr.Saraogi on behalf of Defendant No.2 states that Defendant No.2 will not transfer, alienate, encumber, part with possession of or create any third party rights, title and interest in, to, upon or in respect of flat Nos.14-A and 14-B in the building known as "Sudhakar", Narayan Dabholkar Road, Mumbai and garages, basement rooms, parking space and share certificates relating thereto. The statements are accepted. 3. If the Plaintiff or any of the party desire any further relief in respect of the said flat, they are at liberty to adopt proceedings for the same.