S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4458/2008. (MOHD. ISMAIL VS. RSRTC JAIPUR & ORS.) DATE OF ORDER : 07.08.2008. HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J. Mr. Amraram Rajpurohit for the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner states that though the order of appointment on phase appears to be a contractual one, but as a matter of fact it is an appointment and the petitioner was having a relationship of employee with the respondent Corporation. It is stated that services of the petitioner were discontinued by the respondents without adhering the provisions of relevant Standing Orders. From perusal of the order impugned, prima facie it does not reveal that there is any need of adhering of procedure prescribed in the Standing Orders as the petitioner was working on contract basis. However, the petitioner may prove it by adducing evidence, but for that purpose, this Court is not the appropriate forum. The petitioner may approach the appropriate forum including the forum prescribed under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for redressal of his grievance. Accordingly, this petition for writ is dismissed. The petitioner may avail alternative remedy. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. Anil/