IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 982 of 2008 Smt. Vimla Devi and another ……. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …. Respondents Mr. Deep Joshi, Advocate vice Mr. R.S. Sammal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent No. 1. Mr. Bhuvnesh Joshi, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Deep Joshi, Advocate vice Mr. R.S. Sammal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent No. 1. Mr. Bhuvnesh Joshi, Advocate for respondent No. 2. 2. Shri B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case submitted the chargesheet against the petitioners before the Circle Officer concerned on 31/12/2008 and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit chargesheet before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicated in para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 08.12.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 13.02.2009 Shiv