IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20575 of 2010 MAHANTH SIYARAM DAS . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 17/06/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a police case under bailable sections of Indian Penal Code read with Section-3(x)(xi) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is that the allegations with regard to calling by caste name does not meet the requirements of law as discussed in (2009) 1 S.C.C. (Cr.) 446 (GORIGE PENTAICH versus STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHER) paragraph-3 as it does not disclose that the petitioner was not a member of the Scheduled Caste and had made the statements with the intention to intimidate and humiliate. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Bakhari - 2 - P.S. Case No.27 of 2010 subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)