IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 9142 of 2008 Date of Decision : December 12, 2011 Sh. Dinesh Kumar, s/o Sh. Durga Dass, r/o Village and Post Office Dari, Tehsil and District Kangra. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Himachal Pradesh through Secretary (Revenue), to the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla. 2. The Commissioner, Revenue, H.P. Shimla. 3. The Deputy Commission, Kangra at Dharamshala. 4. Sh. Ranbir Singh s/o Sh. Aflatoo Ram, R/o VPO Upperli Kothi, Teh. And District Kangra. Respondents Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal’s Act, 1985. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 3. Justice Sanjay Karol, J. (Oral) Petitioner submits that his representation (Annexure P-12) is yet pending before respondent No. 3. As such, as prayed for, without going into the merits of the matter, direction is issued to Whether reports of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 respondent No. 3 to look into the same and take a decision thereupon, in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. Liberty, as prayed for, granted to the petitioner to place additional material, if any. Needless to add, all concerned shall be afforded opportunity of hearing and the decision containing reasons shall be communicated to them. 2. With the aforesaid observations, present petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. December 12 , 2011 (PK)