IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3996 of 2006 SIDHESHWAR II Versus THE REG.P.F.COMMISSIONER & ORS ----------- 02/ 11.05.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fixation of his pension under the provisions of the Employees Pension Scheme, 1995 framed under the provisions of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. Learned counsel for the respondent-Employees Provident Fund Organization and its functionaries, submits that the fixation of the pension has been carried out in consonance with the provisions of the Scheme and that there is no infirmity in the same. He, however, submits that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the claim, he is at liberty to raise his grievance before the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner together with supportive details. Having regard to the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner and the respondents-Employees Provident Fund Organization, I dispose of the writ petition with a liberty to the petitioner, if he feels so aggrieved by the fixation of his pension, to file a detailed representation with supportive details before the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Bihar, Patna who shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. S.Sb/- ( Jyoti Saran, J.)