IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH C. W. P. No.17840 of 2006 Date of decision December 11, 2006 M/s Avtar Poultry Farm .......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. BHALLA Present:- Sh. R. K. Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioner. Sh. S. S. Brar, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for the respondents. **** The petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of directions to the respondents to disburse subsidy of 30% being investment incentive. The aforesaid claim has been made by the petitioner on the basis of Industrial Policy, 1996 framed by Government of Punjab. The claim of the petitioner had been contested by the respondents. In the written statement filed by them, it has been maintained that since the unit was closed, therefore, the petitioner was not entitled to the aforesaid investment incentive, inasmuch as, the Industrial policy, 1996 had been framed merely with a view to have industrialization in the State of Punjab and provide incentive to such units which were running. After arguing the case for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to the C. W. P. No.17840 of 2006 -2- petitioner to approach the respondents for the requisite relief. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. (VINEY MITTAL) JUDGE (H.S.BHALLA) JUDGE December 11, 2006 archana