1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA/10626/2009 In FAST/20565/2009 WITH CA/10627/2009 In FAST/20565/2009 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.G.Chapalgaonkar, Advocate, for respondent no.1 for the applicant. Mr.U.L.Momale, Adv., for respondent no.1. Mr. S.M.Vibhute, Adv., for respondent no.3. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:25/1/2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. There is delay of 35 days in causing to file the appeal by United India Assurance Co.Ltd. though the Counsel for the claimant and owner of the vehicle objected. However, I find that the delay by the appellant is not deliberate. The official hassels added fuel to the situation. 2 Substantial rights of the appellant are involved in the matter, as the appellant asserts, the driver had no driving license. Delay condoned. Application (No. 10626/2009) is allowed. Stay petition No.10627/2009 is disposed as the amount is directed to be withdrawn. Both the Counsel waive service for respective respondents. They agree to dispose of the appeal finally at admission stage. Call for R & P. S.O. 22.4.2010. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/10626-09cagr