IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-36357 of 2010 Date of Decision: 16.02.2011 Manjit Kaur and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Pannu, D.A.G., Punjab for the respondent-State. Mr. D.R. Singla, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to safeguard the life and liberty of the petitioners as they have got married against the wishes of respondents No.4 and 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the present petition has been rendered infructuous in view of the written statement filed by the State. Disposed of as such. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 16.02.2011 JUDGE gurpreet