HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH 1 BILASPUR WRIT PETlTlON (C) NO.3519 OF 2010 PETITIONER Keshar Swami Versus Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) & Another (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri‘ J. Present :- Shri Ansul R, Shrivastava, Advocate forthe petitioner Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents.- RE$PONDENTS ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 16th day of July, 2010) 1. The grievance ofthe petitioner is that on 01.04.2010 (Annexure P—1), the petitioner moved an application before-the respondents for grant of temporary permit on the route Nandell to Korba via Kharsiya, Rampur and back one return trip daily. However, till date the same has not been decided by the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the said application expeditiously. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that application of the petitioner shall be considered and deeded in accordance With law and on its own merits Within a reasonable time from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. ln view of foregoing, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the application dated 01.04.2010 (Annexure P/1) filed by the petitioner within a reasonable time from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid direction/ observation, this petition stands finally disposed of. J Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge ashoR