.s.w?'i g RFMf^ ^i^t 00 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C( No.^-s^?'^/2006 PETITIONER , Bipin Barih-a , aged about 30 ^ 2<- vY'. years, S/o Shri Uderani Bariha, ^'^'y ••••"'"' Rf° village Latadadar, Tahsil ..••''."^•'\_1»- Kasdol, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) O.J--" c::^\^" ' ff>->" ^- RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, /" Through Secretary', Forest Departiuen.t, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur ^x^ ^^e^ c^"^'v ^0'^ 2. Union of India, through Secretary Forest Departinent, New DeJlii 3. Forest Range Officer, Charoda / Baranw-apara (Abhyaran^, Distt. Raipur 4. Divisional forest Officer,.^' General Forest Division, Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 tWTCll 8>N|ct» ^s! '^M\<~\^, a-rflu'is, Riciiuy .yy.c.-..^^J.^^200 3ll^l 4aw (ijcit^ct;,!')') '^rfq-iN; 3II^Tsti1 ^trai Bf?tT sn^r 12.10.200S Shri Parag Kotecha, counsel| Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocal on advance copy. Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, c| India on advance copy. Arguments heard. Order dfctated as follows: OftALORDER (|12.10.2006) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. By way of this writ petiti4n Constitution of India, the petition^r, directions to the State authorities constitutiori and etection of the with the said prayer, he has also pr^i schedules the date for election of thfe should aiso be quashed. The subject matter of this W the subject matters of WP No.i have been heard and dismissed by ijhi Learned counsel for the peti\ State/respondents does not dispute In view of the above, this Wf| stage on the grounds and reasons in W.P. No.5524/2006 and W.P. No.t lOlltcl'fl'l *1111flTfftecft<f«1t<;K ^ail^q'sn^T for the petitioner. e for the State/respondenSs No.1 ,3 & 4 lunsel for respondent No.2/ Union of flled under Article 226/227 of the r, has prayed for issuance of certain fo fonnulate the rules pertaining fo the m^mbere of Van Suraksha Samti. Along r^yed that the memo Annexure P-3, Vi/hich 1^ office bearere of Van Swaksha Samiff, Int Petition is exactly identical to that of 55^!2QQ5 and W.P. No.5525/2006, whteh this Court vide ordere dated 10.10.2006. ioner as well as learned counsel for the fhis factua! position. Petition is also dismissed at the motion |ated in orders dated 10.10.2006 passed i.5525/2006. .-f'L- Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge j^tj^