IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33310 of 2009 SAKUNTALA DEVI, WIFE OF JAWAHAR PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PAWNI HASANPUR, P.O. PAWNI HASANPUR, POLICE STATION – VAISHALI, DISTRICT – VAISHALI. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 16.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged is under section 302 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that during investigation, material has come against the petitioner and the witnesses have taken the name of the petitioner. He further submits that the injured had died on account of assault by the accused persons. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected. However, on surrender in case the petitioner makes application for grant of regular bail in the court below within a period of four weeks the same shall be considered on its own merit in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the present order. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)