IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH OCTOBER 2008 / 23RD ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 7656 of 2005(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- KUNDANCHERRY BHASKARAN, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O.CHATHUKUTTY, REJI NIVAS, NAYANAR ROAD, PONNIYAM WEST, ERANJOLI AMSOM, DESOM, THALACHERRY TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNOOR. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THALASSERRY. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PAZHASSI IRRIGATION PROJECT, KANNOOR. 4. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, PAZHASSI IRRIGATION PROJECT, MAINTENANCE DIVISION, KOOTHUPARAMBA. 5. JANARDHANAN.A.P., S/O.SANKARAN, CHANGALATHIL HOUSE, PONNIYAM AMSOM DESOM, THALASSERI, KANNOOR. 6. RAJEEVAN.A.P., S/O.SANKARAN, CHANGALATHIL HOUSE, PONNIYAM AMSOM DESOM, THALASSERI, KANNOOR. ADV. SRI.P.M.PAREETH FOR R5,6 G.P. SHRI.MOHAMMED ANZAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P(C).No. 7656/05. APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1. COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION OF THE SAMITHI. P2. COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD.2.2.05 TO R3 AND R4. P3. COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD.23.2.05 TO R1. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE R5.A. COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS. B. COPY OF THE -DO- C. COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS. D. COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS E. COPY OF THE NOTICE DTD.2.2.05 TO R5. F. COPY OF THE REPLY DTD.7.2.05 TO R4. sdk+ ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge KURIAN JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.7656 OF 2005 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of October, 2008. J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed with the following prayer: i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing the respondents 1 to 4 to consider and pass orders in Exts.P2 and P3 complaints in a legal manner and restore the Pazhassi Irrigation Sub Canal as existed earlier forthwith. In case the petitioner has still any grievance left, petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition before the first respondent, in which case, the first respondent will take appropriate prompt action to see that the canal is restored to its original condition. This writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. smp KURIAN JOSEPH, J. W.P.(C) No. 7656 OF 2005 J U D G M E N T 15.10.2008