^:-.£"-': •.miaswisw mi;M S-T:6://pwg ^ ^lK^r MRflKUr^ .i'l?i;l^<3^:^-0n fetBo* Qffmsr f. i»i»i]i-6»>-<lWAJ ('•> IH ja _Hiss^ou_mo? SAjfir^_rau®_siLA£_JA_aiiP5St liso. Setition Ko. 987. Sei;itip!®r_^- Br. B.T.Shrivastava, aged aliout 51 yea.rs» son of late B,Ii.StB:*tvastava» oeonpatioB : &r'rice,- resident o£ Itinte Boad, Bilaspar, 5'ah.aEd Bistt.Bila^iur. versua .tespondeBts^.? Sta-te ofM.$. thr®ughtte Seoreliaiy, ; Higher Bducatloa BeparitBBiat (Collegi&te^ Vallatila Bhawaa,Shopal). » '-f^ Petiti.oB nn_der Ariiele 226 of the Gons-ti futioB 5i_ AnAi.a^rcit' issuance ol a, writ^iu_ttie Batul'e oTcertiorari^aatid^ulSjj)i'? ;i^oB_ete.^ ^^•for__o^I^raSpi?6pr£a^e^l^~'o?^5~w dir'eet.ioB. N i:'i "'ffia HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WRTT PETmON fS) No.l9of2005 Dr. N.P.Shrivastava. VERSUS State ofM.P. RESPONDENT WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION QF^DIA SB: Hon'Ue Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. J, Present: ShriRajeevShrivastava, AdvocatetQrthepetitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Oovenunent Advocate for the State. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 08B1 dayofOctober, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing fbr the State/respondent submits that in view of the subsequent development as pointed out by the petitioner m his application I.A. No. l.the petitioner may make a representation before the respondent-authorities to consider all the aspects ofthe matter and take decisipn in its own perspective and inaccordance with law, within a period ofeight weeks from the date ofreceiptofthe representation. 2. In vievf ofthe foregoing, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication in this matter and the petitioner may be permitted to take appropriate steps, as aforestated. 3. Inviewoftheabove,thispetitionisdisposedofwtththedirectionand •'" observations, as aforestated. lAinit Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 [Ws :^"^^!?