1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 268 OF 2011. IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6137 OF 2010 (D). Smt. Pushpa W/o Gulabrao Kashyap and Others. .Vrs. Smt. Rangubai Santoshrao Kangale, thr. her Power of Attorney holder Santoshrao S/o Narayanrao Kangale, Nagpur. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. (Mr. V.L. Rajurkar,Advocate for appellants.) -0-0- CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.D.KODE, J J. DATED : 24.06.2011 Heard Mr. V.L.Rajurkar, learned Counsel for appellants and Mr. S.G. Jagtap, learned Counsel for respondent. Controversy is considered on merit at the request of the respondent. Respondent’s suit for recovery of possession on the ground that present appellants are in default and bonafidely need came to be decreed. Regular Civil Appeal filed by present appellants came to be dismissed and thereafter writ 2 petition filed by them, challenging these concurrent orders has also been dismissed by learned Single Judge of this Court on 31st January, 2011. Mr. Rajurkar, learned Counsel for appellants has attempting to contends that findings of paras as recorded are frivolous. We have perused the grounds mentioned in Regular Civil Appeal to which he has drawn our attention. We find nothing to show that the evidence of Satish Gatlewar could not have been accepted by Trial Court. Mr. Jagtap, learned Counsel for respondent has produced possession receipt dated 24/06/2011 which shows that possession of suit premises is already recovered by respondent / landlady today only in execution proceeding. As we do not find any substance in the Letters Patent Appeal. Hence, same is rejected. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE scd//