IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1306 of 2008 SHANTI DEVI Versus RAMDEV MAHTON ----------- 2. 19.8.2008 In view of the statements contained in paragraphs 12 and 16 of the plaint which clearly go to show that there was an apprehension of being dispossessed and after filing of the suit if the plaintiff claimed that he has been dispossessed and pointed out this fact by way of amendment, the same being a subsequent event in no way changing the nature of the suit ought to have been considered by the court below in its true perspective and also allowed within the parameters of order VI Rule 17 C.P.C.. That being so, the impugned order is absolutely vitiated both on account of material irregularity as also jurisdictional error and accordingly the civil revision application is allowed and the impugned order is set aside. The court below is directed to allow the amendment as prayed for by the petitoner and proceed further. ( Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/