RSA NO.350 OF 2006 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.687-88-C of 2007 & RSA NO.350 OF 2006 DECIDED ON : 25.09.2009 Mool Chand & another ... Appellants versus Ramesh & another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Bikram Chaudhary, Advocate for Mr. Jainainder Saini, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Arvind Rajotia, Advocate for the respondents No.1, 2, 5 & 6 . **** AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This appeal has been filed against the judgment of the ld. Lower Appellate Court reversing that of the Trial Court and thereby dismissing the suit filed by the appellant for injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in his possession over the suit land. The Trial Court found that the property in dispute belonged to the appellant and decreed the suit while the ld. Lower Appellate Court reversed the said finding and dismissed the appeal. The following questions have been proposed: i) Whether the plaintiffs/appellants are entitled to the relief of the injunction as claimed? ii)Whether the suit of the plaintiffs/appellants is bad for misjoinder and non-joinder of necessary parties? RSA NO.350 OF 2006 -2- iii)Whether the plaintiffs/appellants have no locus standi to file the suit in question? iv)Whether the plaintiffs/appellants have exchanged their plots with the plots of respondent or not? It would be seen that the proposed questions are pure questions of fact. Learned counsel has not been able to persuade me that the findings thereon are either based on no evidence or on such mis-reading of evidence so as to render them perverse. Consequently, this appeal and application for stay are dismissed. September 25, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE