PSR, J. Crl.P.No. 6284 of 2009 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners; Sri Narasimha Rao Gudiseva, learned counsel appearing for the second respondent and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. It is a case of teasing of an young girl by the first petitioner, supported by the second petitioner, wherein the third petitioner also interfered. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that, in fact, the first petitioner, himself, was the victim in the hands of the complainant’s-people, who was admitted into the hospital and a complaint was also filed in that regard. A reading of the complaint reveals that there was continuous harassment of the girl by the first petitioner and the other two petitioners supported him. All of them have trespassed into the house of the complainant’s family and attempted to outrage the modesty of the mother of the complainant. 3. In the circumstances, it is not a fit case for granting any relief to petitioner Nos. 1 and 2. Accordingly their petition is dismissed. 4. However, as the allegations against the third petitioner are omnibus in nature, it is directed that the third petitioner shall not be arrested till filing of the charge sheet, if any. The investigation into the case and consequential proceedings based on the result of the investigation shall go on. 5. Accordingly, the petition allowed in part, to the extent indicated above. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. Dated:30—10—2009. *BVS