mm swamm (Wu) 4l. mmm WW1¥f3€IW $aimaa1é¥1 SB :‘HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PI 95.09.2010 Shri Pankaj Shrivasfavas ‘ounsel for the petitioner. .L. for the State. Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, Counsel for the pEtiiioner of the: patitioner 1'3 the present f0r disposal of her represen petitioner has alr6a&y mado an retiremeiit but hor apylication 1 to him? 1ast application was 4.12.2008 (Annexure Pjéj be docision has been taken vet. On the other hand. Si ate counsei suburits that the representation of the petitioner [if not decided; would be decided expeditiously. In View of above, the N03 is direct representation of the petitionei decioed, Within three months fr This order, However, the petitio fresh representation also aiong ‘ respondent uTINKEH DXWAKER submits that me iimiteii oraver §etition is for seeking direction tation. He submits that the application seeking compulsory 1as not been decided. According made by the petitioner on fore responcient NOB but no petition is disposed of. The Ed to decide the pending (Annexure Flo}, if already not om the date of receipt of copy of ner would be at liberty to tile a vith the copy of this order. 3t Sd/- . Pritinker Diwaker Judge