""^A^" HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISOARH AT BILASPUR W.P.ffJ/A 2271 No. 38S5/2011 PBTITIONBRS APPLICANTS 1] 2] 3] 4] RBSPONDBIITS VBRBU8 1] 2] 3] 4} 5] 6] Ramsmgh, S/o Jamsm^i, (H/o. Late Smt Candraukanta Bai, D/o Shaiikar Rao Dhote), aged about 57 years^ Raismgh, S/o Ramsmgh, (S/o Late Snit Chandrakaiita Bai^ D/o Shankar Rao Dhote), aged about 37 years, Vijoy Siagh, S/o Ramsiagh, (S/o Late Smt. Chaadrakaata Bai, D/o Shankar Rao Dhote), aged about 29 years, AU above R/o Ali Rajpur, Distriet Jhabua (M.P.). Sint Kalpana, W/o Bavliya^ (D/o Late Smt Chaadrakanta Bai, D/o Shaokar Rao Dhote,) R/o Indore (M.P.). Through: Power of Attoraey Mohd, Hasan, S/o Sheikh Siiltan, aged about 34 years, R/o Baijnatbpara^ Raipur, District Raipiir (C,G-), Sudheer Kuanar Govexdhan, S/o B.K. GoverdhaB, aged about 53 years, .....PIainti|?no. 1 Smt, Aueeta Goverdhaa, W/o Sudheer Kumar Goverdhan, aged about 45 years, ..^..Platatlfftto. 2 Bofh above R/o Plot No. 9, Sahakari Marg No, 2, Choubey Colony, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.). {>remjirao, S/o Late Balchand Rao, aged about 61 years, ..Defendant/resKoadeat Smt Alka Devi, W/o Premjirao, aged about 48 years^ ..Defendaat/reiiiwndent Respondent No, 3 & 4 are R/o Tikrapara, Raipur, Tahsil & Distdct Raipur (C.G.). Saatosh Kumar Jam, S/o Prakash Chand Jaia, R/o Kasam Khasaaiaka Bada (Gujarati Bada), Baijnafhpara, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.). ••Defeiidaat/re»Bondeat State of Chhattisgarh, fhrough; Collector, Raipur, EMstrict Raipur (C.G.). JDefeaidaaxt/i^giWMadexrt y^—^^ .^ -^-— s WRIT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLE 227 OF THB CONSTITUTION QP INDIA. (8B :Hott?bIe Bftr. T.P»SItartiia>J.) Present:- Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, P.L. for the State/respondent No. 6. ORAL- ORDBR (Passedon 18/07/201l) 1, By ffais petition under Article 227 ofthe Constitution oflndia petitloners have chaUenged fhe legality aad propriety offhe order dated 14/6/2011 j^ssed by 9th Additional District Judge, (P.T.C.) Raipur m civil suit No. 14-A/07. 2. Afber sonie argunient, learaed counsel for fhe petitioners seeks to withdraw fhis petition and subinits fhat prcsent petitioners had already challenged fhe ownership of the Alkadevi i.e, respondent No. 4 m anoflier civil suit No. I4A/09 which is pendiag before fhe 5A Civil Judge Class-2, Raipur in whicfa rcspondente are already parties and he seeks to file application for trial of bofh fhe sulte together and for transfer of suit before fhe one Court having jurisdiction to tocy bofh fhe suits beforc fhe competent C^>urt, 3, Prayer aUowed, [) Consequently, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid Uberty, JSubmission of the leaaied cpunsel for the petitioners reveal that both tfae suits may be tded together by same Court. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge .<-t-