Crl. Misc. No.M-25456 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Decided on: November 16, 2010. Crl. Misc. No.M-25456 of 2010. Rahil .. Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and another. . Respondents *** CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI PRESENT Mr.Naveen Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Amit Rana, DAG., Haryana. *** M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner seeks the quashing of FIR No.364 dated 17.07.2010, registered under Sections 376/34 IPC, at Police Station, Nuh, District Mewat, Haryana. The prosecution was launched at the instance of complainant Hakiman agaisnt the petitioner and three others. The complainant seems to have changed her mind to help the petitioner. On the basis of said subsequent event, the petitioner seeks the quashing of FIR. . . . 1 Crl. Misc. No.M-25456 of 2010 Vide interim order dated 27.09.2010, the Investigating Agency was directed to record the supplementary statement of complainant Hakiman who claims that she had married the petitioner. The supplementary statement of the complainant having been recorded on 30.10.2010, it appears that she has amicably settled the matter with the petitioner Rahil. Respondent No.2, has also furnished an affidavit that she had got criminal case registered against the petitioner and three others under misunderstanding. The complainant seems to have made a mockery of the system of administration of criminal justice. Since challan has already been presented, it will be open to complainant-respondent No.2, to depose truth in the Court in case the charges are framed against the accused persons. This petition is dismissed without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner. However, in the interest of justice, a direction is issued that the trial Court will follow the provisions of Section 309 Cr.P.C., to expeditiously dispose of the trial. Statement of complainant will be recorded before the statement of any other prosecution witness. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE November 16, 2010. rka . . . 2