Crl. Misc. No.M-25029 of 2011 (O&M) Kuldeep Singh Vs. State of Haryana Present : Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, A.A.G., Haryana. ******* AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.183 dated 22.09.2010 registered under Sections 21, 61 and 85 of the NDPS Act at Police Station Chandimandir, District Panchkula in which there was a recovery of 30 gms of smack. On 25.08.2011 the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel has argued that the petitioner is being sought to be implicated on an alleged (otherwise inconsistent) disclosure statement suffered by the two main accused and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.” Learned Assistant Advocate General on instructions from ASI Bhagwan Dass has accepted these factual assertions though she states that two other accused have been convicted. Be that as it may, in view of the fact that the factual assertions are accepted by the learned Assistant Advocate General, I deem it appropriate to release the petitioner on bail. It is obvious if the petitioner is found guilty of an offence he would be liable to undergo whatever punishment is imposed upon him. Crl. Misc. No.M-25029 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Ordered accordingly. Petitioner is directed to appear before the learned trial Court on 05.10.2011 and the learned trial Court is directed to release him on bail to its satisfaction subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) September 21, 2011 JUDGE ashish