HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 22nd December, 2010 1st Bail Application No. 1110 of 2010 Order on the bail application of the accused. Waseem S/o Mustafa @ Taya ……. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party In Case Crime No. 322 of 2010 U/S 395, 412, 201, 342 and 420 I.P.C. Police Station Kotwali Manglaur District Haridwar Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Shri Manish Arora, the learned counsel for the applicant and Shri G.S. Sandhu, the learned G.A. for the State. It is alleged that the accused Farman in his statement named the applicant also. Farman has been enlarged on bail by an order of the Court dated 24th November, 2010 in 1st Bail Application No. 945 of 2010. Considering the aforesaid fact, coupled with the fact that the applicant was not initially named in the F.I.R., the Court finds that the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail at this stage without expressing anything on the merits of the case. Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 322 of 2010, U/S 395, 412, 201, 342 and 420 I.P.C., on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 22.12.2010 Shiv