IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 15TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 243 of 2010(E) ------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER IN E.P.221/04 IN LAR.90/2002 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ALAPPUZHA .................... PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- T.G.MICHAEL, THADATHIL VADAKKETHIL, CHARUMOODU (VIA), CHUNAKKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.K.JAGADEESH SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, ALAPPUZHA. GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 243 OF 2010 (E) ===================== Dated this the 4th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is the decree holder in LAR No.90/02, a copy of which is Ext.P1. In order to realise the additional compensation awarded, he has filed EP No.221/04, a copy of which is Ext.P2. His complaint is that despite having filed the execution petition as early as in 2004, the petition is getting adjourned from time to time, as a result of which, inordinate delay is caused in realising the compensation. It is with this complaint the writ petition is filed praying for a direction to the respondents to deposit the compensation. 2. Being a decree holder, the remedy of the petitioner for realising the decreetal amount is to seek execution of the decree in terms of the provisions contained in the Civil Procedure Code. This the petitioner has already done by Ext.P2. Now that execution has been filed, it is up to the Execution Court to get the decree executed and it will be open to the petitioner to move that Court, in which event, I have no doubt that the Court will expedite WPC 243/10 :2 : the proceedings for realising the amount due. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp