IC—78 ^ 3^^ •^WK/t'f, 9-i^V'Kc, fs|cilti^< MIM^II shHI* sn^?r 'fSRK (ijcrfg^Ef) SV^V W [t;-fi+ ?Tsn 'STI^T ^ifl[f^ < ?^iiwgf??r sii^i SINSLE BBICH: HQN'BLE 3US71CE DHIRBI&RA MISHRA RESPONbB4TS Praveen b^evan <ged 35 years, S/o ©overdhan .Deewan, |R/o Village Tum9aon, District Mahasamujid (C.©.) Vs Sovernhient Rural Bhcwai 2. Directfl Chhattli 3. TheCol! 4. 5ub PrescriSsed 5. Chief 5xe< AAahas^ 6. Smt. W/o Tdisil 7. bharml Panch-1 Distridt 03.03.2008 Mr. Vivek Verma, Advocate Mr. Pant«yShrivastavo, Pan^ Heard. By this petition under Arf petitioner has impugned the ordeif' the birector, Panchayat, Chhattis^ COlai[^l<i1Tl HW^ ^ ftl^t ^I^RSR ^aiRnaiitw 1. Stote |of Chhattisgarh, Thr. Secretary, of Chhattisgarh, PanchcyGt & bevelopment Oepartment, D.K.S. , Mantralcya, Raipur (C.&.) |r, birectorate of Panchoyat, S9crl'1, Raipur (C.®.) llector, Distr'ict Mcshasamund (C.@.) l&ivisiona! Officer Officer, Mahosamimd (C.©.) ^xecutive Officer, Janapad Panchcyat, tmund {€.©.). ^nnapurno 5diu, Aged cbout 39 yeia's, Fulsiram Sahu, R/o. Post Tumgaon, Mahasamund (C.6.) sndra Kumar Dhivar, S/o Koduram ?illage Panchayat Tum9aon, Tshsil A Mahasamund (C.©.) P! '•or the petitioner. Lawyer for the Stote. icle 227 of the Constitution of India, the dated 27.8.2007 (Annexure P-1) passed by arh, in Ccee No.97/A-89(9)/05-06 whereby ^35:\1 WSSBg^ ^ ^^^' :C—78 ^E^ ^||q|(»>q, tSiTTl'y'Ko, fsf(>'>l^^< MINdl sb^ll* SV^VJV ft-fi+ ^l^\ SV^t s.h+licti < ao^r TR^ (Tpf^^sr) 200 ?^IIW ^lfel an^I VT-- Panch((yat the revision preferred by the 31.7.2006 (Amexure P-6) passe^! rejected. From perusal of the petit| eleeted Siirpanch of ©ram und tha petitioner is the Up- petitionep and others hwe fited ;xecutive Officer against certain ] herein. The. complaint was duly Officer, who by his order datee Sarpanch is estcblished and her Tumgoon is not in the public inter^; post of Sarpuich. It was furfher Sarpaneh for a further period of ^ y< Respondent No.6-Sarp<nch Panchayat Rcy Adhiniyam against the Collectsr with the observattens Sarpanch did not contain detail given opportunity to adduce opposed to the principies of natur^l resoiutions couid not be passed in the panchcryat and since there t^'as Officer, Janapad Panchayat. Muh^isam ^etitioner herein against the order dated b^ the Coliector, Mdiasamund has been qi|*fi<vl*)ll 'qTOcff ^'f^St' <^i<^i< ^affirasn^T on it oppears that respondent No.6 is the Tumgaon, TAsi! & District Mahasamund of the soid vrwn Panchayat. The a comp!aint before respondent No.S-Chief ]irregutarities committed by respondent No.6 f)3rwarded to respondent No.4-Sub &ivisional 29.6.2006 held that charges against the ;ontinuance ce Sorpanch of ©rarnPanchflyat iterfest and therefore. she is removed from the ^ireeted that she would be disqualified to be of ^ years. preferred on appeal under Section 91 of the above order <md the same was dlowed by that show cause notice issued to the sfescription of the charges ond she wos not evic|ence in support of her defence, which is justice. It has been further observed that ]the Panchayot because of non-cooperation in rf/as a ban imposed by the Chief Executive ('idi^isumund on the Sarpanch for* withdrawa! of •the de .5S 1 ^ ^ "V S^^ ^ ^o 3^^ •^W\<A-'i, »Tf1'M'l<B, (a|C'>l«y iiWv{\ WIRR-•-•••--—--•--•—••——••— ^ 2QQ SIT^CT Tra% (ipf^gq^) 311^1.qffl^IH! !PIT31R^I sfill'ti A A TOIWBfCT OT^I s. panchayat fund from her accounl ifflptemented. The present petitioner and petition against ttie order of the Cd^ the simiiar grounds. From perusal of the ord< subsequently confirmed by the satisfied that there is no illegalit^ above autiiorities which calls foi| jurisdiction under Article 227 of th^ In the resuit. 1tie petition !| dismissed and it is hereby dismjsse4 ^pri?rat;T 'TTCif 'if fsTA <R!*<;I< ^isifgqad^r the beneficia! schemes couic! not be espondent No.7 have preferred a revision lector ond the same was also dismissed on by the Coilector, which w<ss Dir^etor, Panchayat in revision, this Court is or jurisdictionai error committed by the interference in the exercise of writ Constitution. tcs no substance, the same is liabie to be Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge GRPRJ — FS/246—2/2007 — 50.UUO.