IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24076 of 2011 Ramesh Yadav @ Rambilash Yadav, Son of Barahamdeo Yadav. Resident of Village Nanoura, P.S. Nawada, District Nawada. ---------- Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar. 2.Mamta Devi, D/O Sivnandan Yadav. Resident of Village Dumari, P.S. Govindpur, District Nawada. -------- Opposite Parties. ----------- 02/- 16/08/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1469 of 2010 for the offences punishable under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, is named accused in this complaint case with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. Submission is that he still intends to resume and continue the matrimonial relationship with the complainant, who is his one and only wife and in this regard he has also filed Matrimonial Case No. 162 of 2010 before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Nawada. But till date there is no order as regard to ad interim maintenance. To further, strengthen his intention an offer is being made to pay a sum of Rs. 500/- (five hundred only) per month to the complainant by way of ad interim maintenance, subject to any order on the point by the competent court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on the event of filing of an application before the court below stating 2 such intention as stated above and begin with the payment, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail- bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1469 of 2010, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation or even on single default in payment, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)