my; l a/Vé’ @ ‘?7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR(CHHA1TI§GARH) WR1T PErmON No.3%19z2003 / PEITFIONER : xiv, Smt. Shesha Dsouza W/o.Tony k.“ Dsouza,Aged about 38 years ‘ colony,Tah. R/o. L.I.G — 97,Deory & Dist— Bilaspur Khurd VERSUS 1) The State of C.G.,Through, Secretary, Education and Triba! Welfare Department, D.K.S, Bhawan, Raipur, C.G. 2) The Commissioner, Tribai Welfare department, Korba, C.G. 3) District Education officer, District Korba, C..G. 4) The block education officer, Korba,C.G. " 5) The principal, Primary School, Sarva Mangala Para, Korba C.G. 6) The principal, Primary School, Sita Madhi, Korba C.G. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & ZZOF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE WRIT OF MANDAMU OR CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRITS, DIRECTIONS AND/OR ORDERS OF THE LIKE NATURE " / / mm m M 19 Mo 3&9 2W3 mm ''?‘—r / Shri PR. Patankar, cou Shri Sanjay S.Agrawal, advance copy. Heard. The grievance of the pe asel for the petitioner. Panel Lawyer, for the State on present the - petitioner may the detailed representation 2, which shall be considered, n its own merits in accordance with law. t Having considered and on the merits of the case, in justice will be served if a dire tion is given to the petitioner to make a detailed representati n raising her grievances before the respondents no. 1 and 2 - and this order, within a mo being filed, the respondents tioner is that the salary for the \ period 1/6/2000 to 1/9/20 0 has not been paid to her. ' Learned counsel for thc p titioncr submits that for the given an opporturiity of tiling I fore the respondents no. 1 and ithout expressing any opinion ‘ e opinion of this Court, ends of ong with a copy of the petition , and on such representation .1 and 2 shall decide the same [slew m \V , mm mm Wn‘am%?t mmm mmiifs‘ém *mnm ‘ 21.04.2004 xx—Hc—22 V W mwgwggm/mx r. m mam m swam WW ‘ ' mamm wwwm ammmw ' ammam _ N 2 / g: ' on its own merits in acmrda‘nce with law as early as possible preferably within four months from the date of receipt of the representation by a reasoned order. It is made clear that if any gievance still subsist: , the petitioner may avail the remedy avéilalzle under the law. With the aforesaid observations, this petition stands disposed of. I sdl- Fakhruddin Judge H / "