IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10670 of 2005 RANJAN PRASAD SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 7. 16.05.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the learned Counsel for the State and the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents 4 to 6.. From the pleadings in the writ petition it is apparent that the controversy relates to a private dispute between the petitioner and the private respondents with regard to properties in question.. The petitioner has filed a suit for specific performance while the private respondents have filed a suit for eviction. The petitioner is aggrieved by the forceful demolition of his properties even while the suits still remain pending. He is stated to have filed an FIR registered as Kotwali (Adampur) PSase No. 537 of 2005 against the respondents 5 and 6. This Court is informed that chargesheet has been submitted against them and they are on bail. There is no pleading in the writ petition suggestive of state action in the demolition. The writ petition there is clearly not maintainable. Law has already been set in motion by the petitioner both in civil and criminal forum and shall take its course in this private dispute. The writ petition stands dismissed with the aforesaid observation. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)