IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5774 of 2007 Sushila Kumari @Sushila Devi, Wife of Bijendra Mandal, Resident of Village Madhuban, Gram Panchayat- Madhuban, Police Station- Madhuban, District Madhepura …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Director, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The District Magistrate, Madhepura 4. The Child Development Project Officer, Madhepura 5. The Mukhiya, Madhuban Gram Panchayat, District Madhepura … Respondents ---------------------------------- For the Petitioner :Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the State :Mr. S.P. Parasar, A.C. to G.P.-21 02/ 17.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner was appointed as Anganwari Sahayika at Anganwari Centre, North-East from main road, Madhuban. She has filed this writ petition questioning the validity of the order, bearing Memo No. 14 dated 8.1.2007, Annexure-4 whereunder her appointment as Sahayika in the aforesaid Centre has been cancelled on the ground that she is neither matriculate nor does she come from the community of the majority beneficiaries i.e. Yadavas. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that both the aforesaid grounds are not 2 factually correct as the Kewat community is in majority to which petitioner belongs. It is further submitted that there is no requirement under the guidelines that Sahayika should be matriculate. 4. Both the aforesaid submissions can be better appreciated if the petitioner assails the impugned order before the Divisional Commissioner. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to approach the Divisional Commissioner by filing appeal against the impugned order dated 8.1.2007, Annexure-4, which appeal should be disposed of as early as possible, in any case within two months from the date of receipt of memo of appeal by the Divisional Commissioner. Arjun/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)