IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS MONDAY, THE 17TH MAY 2010 / 27TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 14026 of 2010(C) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- T.I.ALIAS,S/O.T.I.ISSAC, CHITETHUKUDIYIL,RAMANGALAM KARA, MARADI VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.R.BINDU (SASTHAMANGALAM) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUVATTUPUZHA. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUVATTUPUZHA. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE(RURAL), ALUVA. 4. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CENTRAL ZONE,ERNAKULAM. 5. CHACKO MATHAI,IRUMBAYIL VEEDU, POTHANIKKAD, MUVATTUPUZHA-686 671. R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.VIPINDAS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.14026 of 2010-C ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 17th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioner alleges harassment by police. Briefly put, the case of the petitioner is as follows:--Petitioner's wife is the absolute owner in possession of 20 cents of land. The 5th respondent is the owner in possession of the remaining property which was originally the family property of the petitioner's wife. There is a demand by the 5th respondent to the petitioner and his wife to sell their property in his favour. They refused the request. The complaint is that the 5th respondent sought the assistance of the Ist respondent to compel the petitioner to effect sale of the property in favour of the 5th respondent. 2. We heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. Certainly the Ist respondent cannot interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the 5th respondent. Learned Government WPC 14026/2010 -2- Pleader submits that the Ist respondent will not intervene on behalf of the 5th respondent to compel the petitioner to sell the property in favour of the 5th respondent. We record the above submission and close the writ petition. It is open to the petitioner to prosecute Ext.P4 before the competent authority. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS