IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 157 of 2009 Mahboob S/o Shri Abdul Rehman ….. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ….. Respondents Mr. Nagesh Agarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1and 2. None for respondent No.3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Nagesh Agarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1and 2. None for respondent No.3. 2. After due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; contents of the F.I.R.; and perusal of the counter affidavit, I do not find that the petitioner is entitled to get the reliefs claimed in the writ petition. 3. The writ petition, therefore, fails and is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed in limine. 4. I am refraining from commenting on the merits of the case lest it may adversely affect the petitioner’s case at the trial, which is yet to start. 5. However, keeping in view the previous litigation in between the parties and the offence against the present petitioner, it is made clear if the petitioner moves bail petition before the court below, his bail petition shall be disposed of expeditiously without waste of time. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 02.04.2009 Shiv