THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.1109 & 2999 of 2004 COMMON ORDER: Both the writ petitions are filed by the same individual. Hence, they are disposed of through a common order. Respondent No.1 in both the writ petitions, a group of Private Aided Elementary Schools under the same management, intended to fill certain posts of Secondary Grade Teachers. Initially, a notification was issued on 07.11.2003, stipulating the pattern of reservation of four vacancies. The petitioner submitted his application for one such post. It is stated that he was called for the interview on 11.01.2004, but was not selected. W.P.No.1109 of 2004 is filed for a direction to the respondents to fill the vacancies as per the roster mentioned in the notification, dated 07.11.2003. W.P.No.2999 of 2004 is filed challenging the appointment of four teachers arrayed as respondent Nos. 5 to 8 in that writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for School Education. The petitioner is under the impression that the notification, dated 07.11.2003, was the only one on the basis of which the interviews are held. However, he came to know later that another notification, dated 04.12.2003, was issued changing the pattern of reservation. He did not challenge that notification. Further, this Court held in the recent past that rule of reservation does not apply to the appointments in private educational institutions. Therefore, the writ petitions cannot be maintained in law. Hence, the writ petitions are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt: 18.11.2010. kdl