IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.509 of 2008 SALIGRAM SINGH ;PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. KAMESHWAR THAKUR 3. BINESHWAR THAKUR 4. SURESH THAKUR 5. CHANDESHWAR THAKUR 6. MAHESHWAR THAKUR 7. LAXMIKANT THAKUR ; OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2 4.12.2008 This revision has been preferred against the order of acquittal dated 14.2.2008 passed by the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar at Sitamarhi in Trial No. 391 of 2007. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the lower court has not properly appreciated the evidence and has wrongly acquitted the opposite parties. However, on perusal of the impugned judgment it appears that the occurrence is of the year 1979. In such nature of petty offence i.e. under Sections 147, 148, 324. 325 and 435 of the Indian Penal Code the opposite parties have already suffered mental agony for 29 years. In counter case lodged by one of the opposite parties the petitioner and others have been convicted. In the impugned judgment sufficient reasons have also been assigned for acquitting the opposite parties. In the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned judgment and order of acquittal. This application is hereby rejected. B.Jha (Ghanshyam Prasad)