SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.330 OF 2011 IN CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7527 OF 2010 Maneksha Jijina and Anr. ...Applicants. v. Dady Kaikhroshroo Banaji and Ors. ...Respondents. Ms S.M.Potdar i/by M/s. Thakordas & Madgavkar ,advs. For the Applicants. Mr.P.M.Rustomkhan i/by Mr.K.R.Tiwari, advs. For the Respondents. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 23, 2011. P.C. 1 Heard. Assuming that there is good reason for delay still I do not find any substance in the present application. Writ Petition No. 7527 of 2010 was heard and disposed off with consent as per the order dated 21st September, 2010 and issue no.4A was framed by this Court. Now the applicant contends that advocate, who was appearing on behalf of the present applicant, i.e., respondent in the said writ petition was not given an opportunity to argue the case and his contention was not accepted. There is no substance in the allegations and the order dated 21st September, 2010 clearly shows that with consent of the learned counsel said issue was framed and petition was disposed off and - 2 - therefore, there is no reason to recall that order and to restore the petition. Application stands rejected. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)