[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.398 OF 1993 Bhimacharya Balacharya Varkhe- dakar, Age-41 years, Occupation: Upadhyaya and Trustee of Vaidika Dharma Sampakshaka Sangha, r/o 2300, Small Dattaghat, Pandharpur, Dist: Solapur. (In the capacity of individual and leader as well as represen- tative of all followers of Sanatan Vaidika (Hindu) Dharma and Vaishnava (Bhagawata) Sampradaya.) .... Applicant - Versus - Prant Officer, Pandharpur Sub-Division, Pandharpur. (In the capacity of individual and leader as well as representative of: 1. Executive Officer, Vitthal Rukmini Temple Committee, Pandharpur. 2. Government of Maharashtra State, Prant Office, Pandharpur-413 304. .... Respondents Shri A.Y. Sakhare as Amicus Curiae vide Order dated 17-6-2003. Shri K.K. Tated, Asst. Government Pleader, for the Respondent No.2. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: NOVEMBER 22, 2004 ORAL JUDGMENT: ORAL JUDGMENT: ORAL JUDGMENT: [2] 1. None present for the respondent No.1. Shri K.K. Tated, A.G.P., for the respondent No.2. 2. The present revision application arises from the order passed on 2-1-1993 in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No.84 of 1990. The said appeal was filed against the order passed by the trial Court rejecting the application for temporary injunction. The trial Court’s order is dated 23-8-1990. 3. In view of the decision of this Court in Nagorao Nagorao Nagorao alias Arun s/o Narayan Yerawar and others v. Narayan alias Arun s/o Narayan Yerawar and others v. Narayan alias Arun s/o Narayan Yerawar and others v. Narayan Nagan Yerawar and another, Nagan Yerawar and another, Nagan Yerawar and another, reported in 2002 (4) Mh.L.J. 615, no revision application lies against the order granting or refusing injunction. The law on the point being well-settled, the question of interference in the impugned order in revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 of the C.P.C. does not arise and hence applying the law laid down in Nagorao’s Nagorao’s Nagorao’s case (supra) this revision application is liable to be dismissed and is accordingly hereby dismissed and the rule stands discharged with no order as to costs. ------