1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.10514 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 Bose ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, Madurai-1. 2. The Executive Officer, Arulmighu Swayambu Saneeswara Bhagavan Thirukovil, Kuchanur, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District. 3. The Fit Person, Arulmighu Swayambu Saneeswara Bhagavan Thirukovil, Kuchanaur, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.5461/2010/A2 dated 13.07.2010 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the first respondent to conduct an enquiry by giving full opportunity on the representation made by the petitioner dated 09.11.2010. For Petitioner ... Mr.M.Kannan For Respondents ... Mr.M.Govindan Special Government Pleader for R.1 ... Dispensed with for R.2 and R.3 ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.5461/2010/A2 dated 13.07.2010 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the first respondent to conduct an enquiry by giving full opportunity on the representation made by the petitioner dated 09.11.2010. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2. Heard Mr.M.Kannan, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader who takes notice for the first respondent. 3. In view of the order that is to be passed, notice to the respondents 2 and 3 is dispensed with. 4. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 5. The petitioner claims that he has been working as poosari in the temple which is disputed by the Executive Officer and the trustee/second and third respondents. 6. On 13.07.2010 in proceedings No. Na.Ka.No.5461/2010/A2, the Tahsildar was directed to take action to remove the persons who are unauthorisedly occupying the temple. 7. That was challenged before this Court in W.P.(MD)No.479 of 2011 by one D.K.Raguraman and the order was issued on 07.02.2011 granting liberty to the petitioner therein to submit a representation to the first respondent/Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, Madurai. The petitioner seeks similar order in this writ petition also. 8. Accordingly, the petitioner is given liberty to submit a representation before the first respondent and in the event of submitting any such representation within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the same shall be considered and dispose of by the first respondent on merits and as per law with notice to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of four weeks thereafter. 9. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No Costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To: The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, Madurai-1. +1 CC to Special Government Pleader (SR.No.32033) W.P.(MD)No.10514 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 15.09.2011 ssl NSV/20.9.11/2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/