IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 3213 of 2009 Between: Managing Committee, Masjid-e-Abbasia, Mattampally Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Rep by its President, SShaik Abbas Ali,S/o.Ali Sahab, aged 64 Occ: Agriculture Labour, R/o.H.No.8-34, Mattampally Village, Matampally Mandal, Nalgonda District, A.P., ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad, A.P., 2 The District Collector Nalgonda, Nalgonda District, A.P., 3 Superintendent of Police, nalgonda District, A.P., 4 P.MANGAIAH, Mattampally Village, Mattampally Manal, Nalgonda District, A.P., 5 MOHD KHADER, S/O. AFZAL ALI, Police Statin Mattampally, Mattampally Village, Mattampally Manal, Nalgonda District, A.P., 6 Shivalayam Committeed, Raghunath Paliyam Village, Rep by its President Mr. Kanchala Raja Reddy, Occ: Surpanch, R/o. Raghunath Paliyam Village, Mattampally Mandal, Nalgonda District. 7 The Village Revenue Officer, Mattampally (V& M) Nalgonda District A.P., .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to pass orders directing the respondents No.1, 2 and 3 herein to conduct enquiry against the respondent No. 4 and 5 herein for not taking action against the culprits responsible for theft of the Nandi from the respondent No.6 herein and also responsible for installing the said stolen Nandi on the land belonging to the petitioner committee, pending disposal of this Writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: None The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No: 3213 of 2009 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the respondents No.1, 2 and 3 herein to conduct enquiry against the respondent No. 4 and 5 herein for not taking action against the culprits responsible for theft of the Nandi from the respondent No.6 herein and also responsible for installing the said stolen Nandi on the land belonging to the petitioner committee, pending disposal of this Writ petition.” On 24.02.2009, this Court directed the petitioner to implead the Wakf Board and the private persons against whom it obtained permanent injunction. On 03.03.2009, when the case came up, no one appeared for the petitioner. Therefore, the case has been adjourned. Even today when the case is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. A perusal of the record shows that no application for impleadment, as directed by this Court, has been filed. These facts suggest that the petitioner and its counsel are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition for non-prosecution, WPMP.No.4168 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J. 9th June, 2009 lmv/es THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No: 3213 of 2009 9th June, 2009 lmv/es