1 SA 277/2011 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 277 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. V.B. Tapkir for the appellant. Mr. A.B. Tajane for respondent no.3. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATE : 2ND SEPTEMBER 2011 P.C. : 1. Appellant is the original plaintiff. He filed a suit against the respondents for a declaration of his title and possession. The defendant nos.1 and 2 appeared but did not file their written statement. The defendant nos.3 and 4 remained exparte. The trial Court, however, dismissed the suit on the 2 SA 277/2011 ground that the plaintiff has failed to prove his title. The lower appellate Court confirmed the said decision. It also held that the appellant-plaintiff had not proved that the suit was within limitation. Two courts below have concurrently held that the plaintiff failed to prove his title. Learned counsel for the applicant-plaintiff was unable to show any evidence proving title by the plaintiff. In the circumstances, the concurrent finding of fact recorded by the two Courts below that the plaintiff did not prove his title cannot be interfered with in a second appeal. The appeal does not involve any question of law, much less a substantial question of law. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)