IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13598 of 2008 ANIL KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Sangeet Deokuliar For the respondents : Mrs. Nivedita Nirvikar, GP – XVI --- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice And Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal --- Dated, the 16th September, 2008 The petitioner claims to have filed this writ petition on behalf of public as he is member of the District Bar Association, East Champaran, Motihari. His grievance is that despite diverse criminal cases lodged against respondent no.10, who is said to be Sub-Divisional Officer, no departmental action has been taken against him by respondent nos. 1 to 9. 2. Save and except, the statement that the petitioner has filed this writ petition on behalf of public as he is a member of the District Bar Association, East Champaran, nothing has been shown which convinces the court about the bonafide of the petitioner in filing this writ petition. Moreover, the criminal cases having already been registered against the respondent no.10, needless to say, such cases shall be taken to logical conclusion. If the respondent no.10 is needed to be proceeded with disciplinary action, it is for the 2 authorities to take such decision. 3. No case for invocation of high prerogative jurisdiction under Section 226 of the Constitution of India is made out. 4. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. R. M. Lodha, CJ. Kishore K. Mandal, J. Neyaz/