IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43207 of 2010 SHUSHIL RAM AND ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are accused for offences punishable under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are members of Shikshak Niyojan Committee and have been falsely implicated in the instant case. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the main accused persons are the Chairman and Secretary of the Samiti, but they have already been enlarged on bail on the basis of order dated 12.5.2009 passed by a bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No.14372 of 2009 and Cr. Misc. No. 15751 of 2009. Learned counsel for the petitioners also avers that FIR was lodged alleging that there were illegality and irregularity with respect to the selected candidates who were 2 discharged from their service, and they all approached the High Court in C.W.J.C. No.1617 of 2008 in which it was held that there were irregularities and hence candidates were given fresh opportunity for fresh counseling. Hence he submits that the same grounds cannot be made out for petitioners’ arrest. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within fifteen days from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order in the court below, the petitioners, namely, (1) Shushil Ram (2) Ainul Haque and (3) Tanija Praveen are directed to be enlarged on bail on executing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Araria in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No.138 of 2008, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PN (S.N. Hussain,J.)