IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1. Criminal Revision No. 38 of 2007 Date of Decision : April 26th, 2011 Arun Kumar ..... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent 2. Criminal Revision No. 2272 of 2007 Date of Decision : April 26th, 2011 Balihar Singh Chohan ..... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Anand Kataria, Advocate, for Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ranvir S. Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) This order would dispose of above mentioned two revision petitions as they have arisen out of a common order dated December 6th, 2006 of Judge, Special Court, Jalandhar, whereby, charge in respect of commission of offence punishable under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, “the Act”) was ordered to be framed against the petitioners and were accordingly charge sheeted in case bearing First Information Report No. 86 dated August 29th, 2005, Police Station – Cantt. Jalandhar on the accusation that on August 29th, 2005 at about 7.30 PM, in the area of Deep Nagar, Jalandhar Cantt., they were found in conscious possession of 200 and 296 capsules of SPASMO PROXYVON respectively without any licence or permit. Criminal Revision No. 38 of 2007 -2- Learned State counsel assisted by Shri Ajay Singla, Assistant Drugs Controller, Punjab has stated at the bar that in view of report of Forensic Science Laboratory, Punjab, Chandigarh, no offence under Section 22 of the Act is made out against the petitioners. In view of above statement of learned State Counsel, the order under challenge is set-aside. Resultantly, the revision petition is accepted and the petitioners are discharged. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 26.04.2011 som IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 2272 of 2007 Date of Decision : April 26th, 2011 Balihar Singh Chohan ..... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Anand Kataria, Advocate, for Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ranvir S. Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) For orders, see Criminal Revision No. 38 of 2007 Arun Kumar Vs. State of Punjab, decided by order of even date (26.04.2011). (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 26.04.2011 som