IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10635 of 2011 AINUL NESSA AND ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.04.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioners being the husband and other family members are apprehending their arrest in connection with Kuchaikote P.S. Case No. 65 of 2010 registered under Section 498A of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the D. P. Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners were granted provisional bail and executed bail in pursuance to that order. In that view of the matter, their anticipatory bail is not maintainable in view of ratio laid down in Bishundeo Sahu Vs. The state of Bihar reported in 2011(1)P. L.J.R. 731. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner and try to dispose off the same preferably on the same day if possible, in view of ratio laid down in the aforesaid 2 order if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)