IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 827 of 2008 Vinkesh Pant and others … Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others … Respondents Mr. Sidhartha Sah, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Sidhartha Sah, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. 2. Learned Brief Holder for the State submits before this Court that it has been indicated in para 2 of the Counter Affidavit that the police has completed the investigation and after completion of investigation the police has found that there is a prima-facie case against the petitioner nos. 1 to 3 (Vinkesh Pant, J.P. Pant and Smt. Vimla Pant respectively). It has also been alleged in the counter affidavit that there is no prima-facie case against the petitioner no. 4 Smt. Archana Tyagi. As such, the police has submitted the chargesheet before the Circle Officer against he petitioner nos. 1 to 3. It was further submitted that in view of above the writ petition filed by petitioners seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them has, now, become infructuous. As such, the police is likely to submit the final report/ chargesheet, as the case may be, before the competent court in the near future. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. However, interim order dated 22.10.2008 shall remain operative till the final report or chargesheet, as the case may be, is filed before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 17.12.2008 LSR