HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.8920 OF 2010 ORDER: Heard Sri Sreenivasa Rao Velivela, Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.Ramachandra Reddy, Learned Standing Counsel for the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation. At their request, the Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission. The petitioner claims to be the owner of 100 sq. yards in premises No. 1-5-240, Zamistanpur, Musheerabad, Hyderabad having purchased it under a registered sale deed dated 31.08.2000. Reference is made by the petitioner to the link document i.e. registered sale deed dated 01.05.1965 to show that her vendor had title over the property in question. The petitioner claims to have approached the respondent-Corporation on 06.04.2010 with an application seeking building permission. Her grievance is that the respondents refused to receive her application on the ground that it was not accompanied with T.S.L.R Certificate and No Objection Certificate from the revenue authorities. In more or less similar circumstances, this Court, in Hyderabad Potteries Private Limited v. Collector, Hyderabad[1] and Adge Nagaraju (judgment in WP.No.26366 of 2009 dated 03.12.2009), held that a local authority cannot insist on production of T.S.L.R. or No Objection Certificate from the District Collector. Following the said judgments, the respondents are directed to receive and process the application of the petitioner for construction of the building without insisting on production of T.S.L.R. certificate and No Objection Certificate from the District Collector. The respondents shall, however, ensure that the provisions of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955, the rules and the building bye-laws made thereunder are adhered to while considering the petitioner’s application for grant of building permission. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. However, in the circumstances, without costs. RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J Date:01.06.2010 Usd [1] 2001(3) ALD 600