IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND OCTOBER 2008 / 30TH ASWINA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 871 of 2008(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.12713/2008 Dated 02/05/2008 .................... PETITIONER/WRIT PETITIONER ----------------------------------------- P.B.JAYANENDRA KUMAR, AGED 46, S/O.P.K.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, JUNIOR HEALTH INSPECTOR GR-I, SREE NIDHI, FORT, NEYYATTINKARA. BY ADV. SRI.DEEPU THANKAN RESPONDENT: RESPONDENT IN WP ------------------------------- DR.K.SHYLAJA, AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.BASANT BALAJI THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON ON 22/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cont. Case (C) No.871 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 22nd October, 2008 JUDGMENT An affidavit has been filed by the respondent answering the accusations. Along with the affidavit, Annexure R1(a) copy of the hearing notice which was given to the petitioner is produced. It is stated that in spite of Annexure R1(a), the petitioner did not turn up. Annexure R1(b) proceedings were issued after considering the petitioner's application, Ext.P4. Having gone through Annexure R1(b), I am of the view that if the petitioner is having any grievance about Annexure R1(b), he will have to challenge the same in separate proceedings. With the above observation, the Contempt of Court Case will stand dismissed. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE