IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ PetitionNo.21679 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.11.2011 Shanti Swaroop and others .....Petitioners versus The State of Haryana, through its Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary, Government of Haryana, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Civil Secretariat, Haryana, Chandigarh, and others. ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr. Bharat Bhushan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No. 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? No. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ?No. ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) 1. Without going into the merits of limitation or the entitlement of the petitioners, the counsel for the petitioners states that he will be satisfied if the writ petition is treated as representation given to the respondent. It is directed that respondent No.4 shall consider the same and pass appropriate order. The same be done within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 2. The writ petition is disposed of. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE 22.11.2011 sanjeev