HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Civil Review No. : 46 of 2008. Decided on: 28.7.2008. Omi Thakur ……… Petitioner. Versus Union of India and others. ………Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioner: Mr.Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For respondents: None. Deepak Gupta, J.(Oral): This review petition has been filed on the sole ground that though the writ petition filed by the review petitioner was allowed and she was directed to be reinstated, this Court has denied the benefit of back wages to the petitioner for the period she has not worked. Aggrieved by this portion of the judgment, the present review petition has been filed. Mr.Ajay Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, has relied upon the two judgments, which are also cited in the judgment under review and contends that since the petitioner was not at fault and it is the respondent-employer who had illegally terminated her services, the back wages could not have been denied to her. ___________ 1.Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. - 2 - This Court, after due consideration of the authorities concerned, had decided that the petitioner is not entitled to back wages for the period she has not worked. The authorities cited have been considered. There is no error apparent on the face of the record. Therefore, the review petition is dismissed. (Deepak Gupta), Judge. July 28, 2008. (V.K. Ahuja), (TILAK) Judge.