IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 1ST OCTOBER 2010 / 9TH ASWINA 1932 RP.No. 879 of 2010(F) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.28857/2010 Dated 23/09/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONERS: -------------------------------------------------- 1. THOMASKUTTY, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O.KURIAKOSE, ORAMADATHIL HOUSE, SOUTH MARADI P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA. 2. VINCILY MANITHOTTAM, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.PAULOSE, MANITHOTTATHIL HOUSE, SOUTH MARADI P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA. 3. T.G.JOBI, S/O.GEORGE, KEEZHUTHADAYIL HOUSE, OORAMANA P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA. 4. T.P.ALIAS, S/O.PAILY, THURAVASSERIYIL HOUSE, KAYANAD, MUVATTUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.K.S.PRAVEEN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 030. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA, PIN-686 681. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUVATTUPUZHA, PIN-686 661. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/10/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ R.P.No.879 OF 2010 IN W.P.(C) NO. 28857 OF 2010 (F) ===================== Dated this the 1st day of October, 2010 O R D E R The petitioners main grievance is against the direction in the judgment that if request is made for temporary release of the vehicles, that will be dealt with consistent with the principles laid down by this Court in Shan C.T. v. State of Kerala [2010(3)KHC 333]. Petitioners complain both against the requirement of deposit of 30% of the value and also furnishing bank guarantee for the remaining. 2. As far as the deposit of 30% of the value of the vehicle is concerned, that is fully covered by the Full Bench judgment. The second part, namely, requirement of furnishing bank guarantee is concerned, the Full Bench itself has given option to the adjudicating authority to accept property security also. Therefore, leaving it open to the petitioners to offer property security towards 70% of the value as ordered in the Full Bench judgment noticed above, this review petition is disposed of. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp