"^«^-JLLt^ ,JK<ii,4^^ m THE HIGH COVRT OF CHHATTISCrAKH AT BILASFUR Suigls Bencff CONTEMPT CASE (CIVILl N0. ^i^ OF 2011 PETmONER: NUam Tigga, S/o Late Shri Larens Tigga, aged about 39 years, presently posted and working as Pre Metric Boys Ho.stel Superintendent, viUage and post Ranhat, Balrampur, District Sarguja (CG). Versus CONTEMNORS/ IIESPONDENTS 1. 2. Shri G.S. Dhananjay, Collector, Sarguja, District Sarguja (CG). Shri Dev Kumar Gupta, Block Education OfBcer, Bakanipur, District Sarguja (CG). af CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT. 1971. ^ -+ XI-HC—78 ^wvtf a>*ii^ s'sr -^ww^, w»\v' ,hviwy, ^^(C')^o.^ Wl: 3:lI^T1raqT (^q^q^q) an^rw ft-fi'* 'TTBTT 3^?T ^qf^ Wtiwafeian^r SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mohan 01-0-3-2011 Shri Jitendra Shrivastava, cou The petitioner has fiied this dated 19/08/2011 passed in Vv.P.(S) Learned counsei ror the petiti( the transrer order dated 15/07/201 competent autnonty to pass a rrest interest, ir necessary. Learned counsei for the petiti iHsei ror tne petitroner. t>etition alieging wiiiful disobedience of order INo.4753/11. submitted before the Biock Educatioh Ofricer on 25/08/2011 (Annexure C/3), upon wnfcn. tne petitioner was given a iettl hand over the charge. The petitione) for aue compliance of me oraer of passea ana neimer the petitioner wj nor the salary has been paid. The order was passed by ti( submitted representation before fhel Jetter bv which the petitioner was dirt movea representation Derore tne uo to !ssue any notice. It nas however, petitioner is entrtiea to continue at alreaay Deen auasnea. On petil =bl<l[fl'!it-f •qTC'if •? feet TfW^R ^ srRrq an^r snnvastava. ^. ner suDmits tnat viae oraer aatea la/uy/^oi i, has been quashed reserving iiberty to the order In administrative exigencv and DUblic fciner suDmits tnat the oraer of tne court was ^r aatea ^4/os/zui i requiring me Detrtioner to nas suomittea representatlon to the i^oilector the Court, but tiii date, no orders have been ss aiiowea to continue in me piace or Dostina e Court on 19/08/2011. The petitioner has Block Education Orncer on 25/08/201 1. The icted to hana' over the charge is the date prior to recelpt of petitioner's representatifan dated 25/08/2011. The petitioner has now lector. Therefore, at present, i am not inciined to be observed that once the order of transfer has been quashed, unless the libety reserved is exereised by the Coiiector, the he same place, as the order of transfer has oner's statement, reDresentation nas Deen -subnlitted to the Coilector on 26/y8/2011. The CoiiectCr shaii therefore take ~t- ,-^w ^•^ ^ -+ XI-HC—78 HWWI VhWi 3^ ^WM^, ®Tll<H'|to,I^RfRfy •- &^^(c')\^o-^^,/lf Wt 200 an^T Tra^ (ipfg^ti) <niSnw ft-t1* WITSD^TsinN; Deepti ?wiw flfei 3ii^ir ^ necessary steps in comptiance of u taKen or me Detltioner is not aiiowea be at iibertv to Fevlve this petition. A CODV or mis oraer mav De p aue compiiance. \— +n[<n<fli ^s^ ^ fs^ T^^re ^sifirqan^r |e order of the-Court. in case, no steps are to continue or paia salary, me petitioner wouia ie Detition is finaliv aisposea off. aced bv the Detitioner before the Coilector for Sd/- , Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge •9 ^-