IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGAKH^BiLASPUR Writ Petition No. 397 of 2002 Petitioner Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Through Divisional Manager, M.P.S.R.T.C. Raipur Divisioa, Ama Naka, Raipur (C.G.) State of Ctihatds^rh, Through CIuef Secretaiy, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) The Collector, Raipur (C.Q.) Town aad Countiy Plaaning OfiBce, Through Joiut Director, Raipiu- (C.G.) State of M.P. Through Chicf Secretoy, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) Public Works Department, Through Executive Eugmeer, P.W.D. Dis^on uo.l, Raipur (C.G.) WRtT PETITON UNDEK ARTICLB 226 AND 3!27pi<"n-lE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agcdhotn J.) Shri Vivek Rafhore, Advocate for ibs petttfoner. Stari Alok: Bakshi, Oovt Advocate for the respoiidente No. l, 2, 3 aad 5. ORDER (Passed on this 26d> Day ofAi^ust, 2008) 1. Leamed couusel appearmg for thc pctitioner, on instructions, subnuts that the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition, as this petition has become infi-uctuous. 2. Learued counsel appearing for fhe respondeats/State has DO objection. 3. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as wifhdra«ni,as haviag becoiue iufructuous. Consequently, M(W)P No. )2 stends dismissed. — Sd/- SatishK.Ag,,ifiotri r^ 3udSe