1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 285 OF 2002 Shailesh D. Agrawal ...Plaintiff. Vs. Laxmi Enterprises & Anr. ...Defendants. Mr. D.R. Jhuriya for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 20th AUGUST, 2009. P.C.- 1 On 16th June, 2009, it was recorded that the parties have settled the matter and the consent terms is duly signed by both the parties and the Advocate for the Plaintiff. The matter is listed today under the caption “for filing consent terms”. 2 Both the parties are present in the Court. The statement is made that the consent terms is well within the framework of law and the record. 3 The suit is accordingly disposed of in view of the consent terms, with liberty. 4 Decree be drawn accordingly. 5 The refund of court fee, if any, in accordance with law. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)