/ //’\ e” Single mach w / , IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G.) WRIT PETITION NO. 42—05 2004 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA , ( \ao‘ PETITIONER CW. NZ?» \/\ wj’Mahesh Kumar Tiwari, aged about 59 . years, son of Late Shri A.P. Tiwari, Inspectgwf, Police, resident of near Mannu Chowk, Tikarapara, Bilaspur $$¢. ‘k§ (Chhattisgarh) $ xg «(if Q. ‘ e9 0:7 VERSUS Way xb‘ RESPONDENTS 1. ‘ The State of Chhattisgarh, > through The Secretary, Department of Home (Police), Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. The Director General Of Police, Department of Home, Police Head \ Quarter, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 3. The, Superintendent of Police, District Janjgir-Champa (CG) XI~HC 78 ‘ . wy‘No, q203—/0L7, QEQW $§I$ W206 @ mm (WEI) WWW WWW WWW WW WIW %aif"n’qanéw \x f 8-12-2004 Shri Arvind Dubey, Counsel fc‘r the petitioner. Shri Sudhir Agrawal, Panel Lawyar for the State. Application for urgent hearing is allowed. Heard. Learned counsel for the pet itioner submits that the matter relates to transfer of the petitioner He submits that he has been transferred nom Distt. Janjgir Cham‘pa to Economic OEences Wing, Raipur as per annexure P/l and none has been posted in his place. He mrther submits that only 8 months ve remained for retirement ofthe petitioner. He further submits that f the present the petitioner may be given an opportunity of tiling the ' tailed representation before the competent authority of the respond ts, which shall be considered on its own merits in accordance with law Having considered and witho t expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in the opinion of 's Court, ends ofjustice will be served if a direction is g‘ven to tlrh petitioner to make a detailed representation raising his grievances efore the competent authority of the respondents along with a copy of' e petition and this order, within 15 days; and on such representa‘on being filed, the competent authority of the respondents shall de the same on its own merits in accordance with law as eariy as possible preferably within two months from the date of receipt ofthe represe tion. \ XI-HC '78 WW WW W . \yQ’Na. %;6$/B”I ‘ WW Ea zoo mm (Wm mmw Wwm WWW WIWR $aimaméw Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been relieved He prays that the petitioner may be allowed to‘ continue. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and since only 8 months have remained retirement oft the petitioner, it is directed that during the pend petitioner be allowed to continue. With the aforesaid observation, this petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.W.P.No. 457 V/2004 also standsdisposed of. Certified copy as per rules. j Sdl- . TIH ‘r r Fakhruddin Judge ey of the representation, the