1 wp-1092.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1092 OF 2011 Taluka Sahakari Kharedi Vikri Sangh Ltd., Latur, Nanded Road, Near Lal Godam, behind Old Power House, Latur, (Through its Chairman Shri. Arun s/o Dnyanoba Patil, Age: 48 years, Occ: Agri., R/o. Matephal, Tq. & Dist. Latur. ...PETITIONER VERSUS Babruwan s/o Nivrutti Ghadge, Aged 55 years, Occ: Service, R/o. Chikurda, Tq. & Dist. Latur. ...RESPONDENT ... Mr. A.N. Irpatgire, Advocate for petitioner. (Absent). Mr. D.G. Nagode, Advocate for respondent sole. ... CORAM: S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 25TH AUGUST, 2011 PER COURT : This writ petition is filed challenging the judgment and order dated 07-10-2010 passed by the Member, Industrial Court, Latur in Complaint (ULP) No. 8 of 2010. 2 wp-1092.11 2. When the matter is called out, none appears for the petitioner. Learned Counsel for the respondent is extensively heard. With his assistance, this Court perused the pleadings of the petition and grounds taken therein. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent invited my attention to the certificate at Exhibit-U-8 which formed the part of the record of the Industrial Court. According to learned Counsel for the respondent, said certificate is signed by the Manager of Taluka Sahakari Kharedi Vikri Sangh Ltd., Latur, Chairman Mr. Arun Dnyanoba Patil and Accountant and therefore, relying on the said certificate, complaint filed by the petitioner therein, respondent herein, was partly allowed by the Industrial Court, Latur and the petitioner herein was directed to pay the amount of Rs.3,14,037/- to the complainant within a period of three months from 07-10-2010 with further direction to pay the said amount with interest @10% per annum w.e.f. 01-02-2010 till the date of actual payment of entire amount. However, claim 3 wp-1092.11 for amount of Gratuity and Provident Fund is dismissed. 3. I have heard learned Counsel for the respondent. Perused the pleadings and grounds taken in the petition, annexures thereto, original record which is summoned from the Industrial Court, Latur and in particular Exhibit-U-8. From the perusal of Exhibit-U-8 it appears that, the said certificate is signed by the Manager, Accountant and Vice-Chairman of the Taluka Sahakari Kharedi Vikri Sangh Ltd. The Industrial Court in Para-9 of the judgment has recorded the findings that " It is pertinent to note that the witness of the respondent Mr. Arun Dnyanoba Patil has also admitted during cross examination that this certificate Exh. U-8 is signed by Manager and Accountant. He further admitted that it is also signed by him." 4. Therefore, once the certificate is signed by all three responsible persons namely Arun 4 wp-1092.11 Patil, Accountant and Manager of Taluka Sahakari Kharedi Vikri Sangh Ltd., Latur and upon production of such certificate in the evidence, the Industrial Court has correctly recorded the findings in Para-9. Therefore, the findings recorded by the Industrial Court in respect of the certificate Exhibit-U-8 are not perverse and are in consonance with the contents of Exhibit-U-8. Therefore, view taken by the Industrial Court is a possible view in consonance with the evidence brought on record and in particular Exhibit-U-8. 5. In that view of the matter, no case is made out to interfere in the extraordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court. Writ Petition is devoid of any merits and same stands rejected. Interim relief stands vacated. . Record and Proceedings be sent back to the concerned Court, forthwith. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/AUG11