THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. LAKSHMANA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No.93 of 2006 ORDER: (Per BPR,J) Heard both sides and at their request the main appeal is taken up for final disposal. The writ petitioner is the appellant herein. Aggrieved by the non-payment of the subsistence allowance granted by this Court on earlier occasion in WP.No.26919 of 2005, the present writ appeal is filed. The grievance of the appellant is that no such amount has been paid. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent submits that a certificate of non- employment was not produced. However, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has filed the said certificate, therefore, the learned Single Judge, while dismissing the writ petition, gave a direction to consider the case of the writ petitioner vis-à-vis the certificate filed by him. Having regard to the same, without going into the merits of the case, we hold that the order, dated 26.12.2005, passed in WP.No.26919 of 2005, passed by the learned Single Judge, warrants no interference of this Court. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. _____________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J ___________________________ P. LAKSHMANA REDDY, J Date: 31.01.2006 ES