IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 22ND DECEMBER 2011 / 1ST POUSHA 1933 WP(C).No. 34575 of 2011(V) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- V. SATHEESAN, CHARIVILA VEEDU, VADAKKODE, PERUMMBAZHATHOOR.P.O., NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI.K.JAJU BABU, SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI, SRI.T.R.SADEESAN, SRI.T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH, SMT.DIVYA CHANDRAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANDANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003, REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, SABARIMALA DEVASOM, SABARIMALA, PIN - 689 465. 3. SRI. SALAM, PAVOOR PADEETATHIL, NJAKKANAL.P.O., OCHIRA, KAYAMKULAM, PIN - 690 526. R1 & R2 BY SRI. V.V.N. BAMBIAR, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/12/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).NO.34575/2011-V: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO. EOP-2383/11/SAB DTD. 20/11/2011 ISSUED BY THE R.2. TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE LICENCE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE RANNI - PERINAD PANCHAYAT DTD. 20/11/2011 VIDE NO.A2-36/2011. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE RECEIPTS DTD. 02/09/2011 & 05/12/2011 FOR RS.27,67,000/-, 20,000/- 5,00,000/-, 16,35,000/- MADE BY PETITIONER TO DHANALAXMI BANK. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.EOP-2389/11/SAB DTD. 19/12/2011 ISSUED BY R.2. TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DTD. 19/10/2011 ISSUED BY THE R.2. TO THE R.3. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE LICENCE NO.A2/64/2011 DTD. 20/11/2011 ISSUED BY THE RANNI - PERINAD PANCHAYAT TO THE R.3. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD. 14/12/2011 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.(C). 33444/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Prv. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan & C.T.Ravikumar, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.34575 of 2011 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2011. Judgment Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the TDB. The impugned Ext.P4 is only a notice. We, therefore, direct the petitioner to appear before the Executive Officer, Sabarimala and give a list of the types of articles he vends from his outlet for which licence is granted. The Executive Officer will look into that and issue an order. If there is any further dispute between the petitioner and the Executive Officer in that regard, the matter can be taken up with the President of the Board or even the Special Commissioner as and when the Special Commissioner WPC34575/11 -: 2 :- is available in Sabarimala. If the petitioner is conducting his activity strictly in accordance with the terms of Exts.P1 and P2, obviously, the activity would be permitted to continue since there is no interdiction in Ext.P7 for lawful activities in terms of licence. The writ petition ordered accordingly. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. C.T.Ravikumar, Judge. Sha/2312