1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 54 OF 2010 Anil S/o. Khemraj Chaurasia ...Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra (a) Regional Transport Office, Mumbai (b) Dy. Commissioner of Police (Traffic) ...Respondents WITH PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO. 41 OF 2010 Indian Mumbaikars for Peace and Community Togetherness (Impact) & Anr. ...Petitioners V/s. Dy. Commissioner of Police (City) Traffic & Ors. ...Respondents The Petitioner, party-in-person, in PIL No. 54 of 2010, present Mr. Mubin Solkar for the Petitioners in PIL (L) No. 41 of 2010 Mr. S.K. Nair, 'A' Panel Counsel, for the Respondent/State. CORAM: J. N. PATEL AND S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE: APRIL 29, 2010. 2 P.C.:- Heard. 2. These two petitions have been filed by the petitioners, challenging the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police (City) Traffic, Mumbai, prohibiting entry of two-wheelers on the Hazrat Makhdoom Faquih Ali Mahimi Flyover (JJ Flyover) from 1200 hours on 1st April, 2010 onwards. 3. The issues raised in these petitions deserve to be considered by the respondents, which is the competent authority in the matter, and cannot be a subject-matter of judicial review. 4. As we do not find that by issuing such a Notification, the authorities have committed any error or illegality, we dismiss these petitions, with liberty to the petitioners to approach the competent authority. 3 5. Needless to say that if concrete suggestions are given to the respondent-authorities, they will take the same into consideration and take a decision on the issues raised by the petitioners. J. N. PATEL, J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.