IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1606 of 2008 BAIJNATH PRASAD KESHARI Versus DULHIN RAMANI DEVI & ORS ----------- 3 30.09.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, when the impugned order has only decided this much that Chhathia Devi is the daughter of Lalchand Lohar , this Court would not find any reason to interfere on a pure finding of fact which also has been arrived by the Court below after examining evidence both oral and documentary laid by both the parties. What impact Chhathia Devi will bring to the execution case, is entirely a different issue inasmuch as the Chhathia Devi will only be walking into the shoes of her father in whose favour no decree was passed by any Court. In that view of the matter, by adding Chhathiya Devi in the execution case, the petitioner has suffered no injury. It however goes without saying that the Executing Court taking into account that the matter has travelled upto the Supreme Court and the decree has now stood affirmed by all the Courts, would take all the immediate steps for executing the decree preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a - 2 - copy of this order. With the aforementioned observations and directions this Civil Revision application is disposed of. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)