THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Tr.C.M.P.No.319 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner is the wife of the 1st respondent. The latter filed I.D.O.P.No.94 of 2010 in the Family Court, Guntur, against the petitioner, for divorce, under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act. The 2nd respondent was impleaded by making certain allegations. The petitioner seeks transfer of the O.P., to the Court of appropriate jurisdiction at Amalapuram. The petitioner states that the 1st respondent made serious allegations against her in the O.P., and she is finding it difficult, delicate and unsafe to appear in the Family Court, Guntur. The 1st respondent has opposed the application. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the 1st respondent. There is no dispute that the petitioner is now residing in a village in East Godavari District. The parties are said to be Christians. The allegations made against the petitioner in the O.P., are a bit serious. Illicit intimacy was attributed between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent. In such a background, the petitioner cannot be expected to face the proceedings, in the native place of the 1st respondent. Hence, the Tr.C.M.P. is allowed, and I.D.O.P.No.94 of 2010, is transferred from the Family Court, Guntur, to the Court of II Additional District Judge, East Godavari, at Amalapuram. It is directed that the learned II Additional District Judge shall not insist on the appearance of the 1st respondent on every date of hearing, except when his presence is needed for recording of evidence, or undertaking conciliation. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dated:04.08.2010 GJ