w 9 E B ‘i §§ngie ench : Han’ble Smi H.L. Datiu, C Shri Goutam Bhaduri, oounsei for the appiicant. 3“ ) (Paesed ori i March, 2997 The pettioner in Writ Petition No.‘i0’i of 2004 is the i 8 compiainan‘t in this contempt petition. He aiieges that the respondents have disobeyed the orders and directions ised by this Couri on su 01.97.2004. in support of his asseriion, the petitioner has ereduced a ietter issued bv the reseondents dated 14.02.2005. {2) Before t advert to the contention canvassed by the learned counsei for the petitioner, it wouid be useful to refer to the orders passed by this Court in. another writ petition wherein the petitioner had questioned the very notice issued on 14.02.2005. White entertaining thewrit petition the Court has not oniy condemned the action of the 2“ respondent but aiso granted interim order of stay. w\ HIGH CQURT GF JUBwkTURE AT B§LASPUR: CHHk‘THSGARH Centemm Petiticn No.27 OF 2005 Fresem: QRAL OR3ER Apbiécant Madhav Rae Channawar, Sfo. Gopinath Channawar, Aged about ?8 years, Represented by his son Am! Channawar, Aged about 38, years, R/c. Shuk!a CoionyfJai! Road, ’ Raipur (C.G.) u . Vs. Sememeors 1 ‘ Shri VP. Maiviya, Joint Director, Nager Tatha Gram Nivesh, Districf Office Raipur. 2. Shri Ashck Agrawai, Commissioner, Municipai Corporation, Raipur, Municipal Corporation Reipur. (3) The one and emy dii'ectwn issued by ihis Ccuri whiae ente‘rtaining the writ petitianNoASM of 2004 decided ca 01 .072004 is no‘: t0 demoiish the disputed property tiil the next date of hearing: (4-) The {eepondents nearly after eight months from the date ofjihe interim order, has issued a iefter to ihe peii'iioner asking i0 dejmeiis‘n the disputed property. That notice was ihe sebject metier in aaother Writ Petition M3355 of 2005. ¥g (5) in View of the above circumstancee, i do not interid to take oognizence of .the contempt petitiorg. Acccrdingiy, contempt proceedings are ér‘opped. (6) However, any observation made by me in ihe course of disposing of this petition wouid not come in the way of the petitioner to take at! the contentions which are aveiieble to him. .4/1/«7/ chief Justice’