-1- FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 3523/2008. ( Shri Shambhunath Shukla .vrs. Rajdhari Interstate Transport ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or Directions Court's or Judge's Orders. And Registrar's Orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : OCTOBER 15, 2008. Heard Advocate Shri A.R. Prasad for petitioner / employee and Advocate Shri A.N. Vastani, for respondent nos. 1 and 2. In order to show nature of his duties, petitioner wanted his employer to produce certain document. Industrial Court has observed that the request can be considered in future at appropriate time. Advocate Prasad, argues that as evidence is to be led about the nature of duties, documents were essential and he further states that inspite of this, the documents have not been filed by the employer. Advocate Shri Vastani, states that the petitioner's affidavit of examination-in-chief is -2- already filed, and respondent have also placed relevant documents on record. The learned Member of Industrial Court has not rejected the request of petitioner for direction to respondents to produce documents. It has only postponed its consideration. The petitioner therefeore, can depose about the nature of duties and if after recording such deposition or during deposition the Industrial Court find that the documents are necessary, it can pass appropriate orders. I find that there is nothing as on today to enable the petitioner to approach this Court in the matter. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. At the joint request of the parties, proceedings ULPA Complaint before the Industrial Court is expedited. JUDGE Rgd.