IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 25TH OCTOBER 2011 / 3RD KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 25338 of 2011(N) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- T.P.ASHOKA KUMAR, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.V.PRIYADARSANAN, SAINANDANAN, HOUSE NO.9/643, PANAYAM, PERINAD P.O., KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY ADARSH ASHOK, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O.T.P.ASHOKA KUMAR. BY ADVS. SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY SRI.ADEEP ANWAR SMT.RENJINI RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE TAHSILDAR, PATHANAPURAM TALUK. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ALAYAMON VILLAGE. BY ADV. SMT.M.J.RAJASHREE,SR.GOVT.PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AV WPC.NO.25338/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : P1 : COPY OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEYDATED 17.05.2010 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. P2 : COPY OF THE DEED NO.500/83 OF SRO.ANCHAL SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. P3 : COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 18.06.2010 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P4 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE AV ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 25338 of 2011 N ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 25th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petitioner is the Power of Attorney Holder of his father and Ext.P1 is stated to be the Power of Attorney. According to him, the property covered by Ext.P2 belongs to his father and what is complaining of in this writ petition is the alleged refusal of the respondents in accepting the tax payable in respect of the property. 2. However, in the writ petition, nothing has been raised indicating that the property has been mutated on the strength of Ext.P2 or that tax was paid on that basis. In such circumstances, no direction is possible against the respondents to accept tax as sought for by the petitioner. Be that as it may, if the property is not mutated, it will be open to the petitioner to seek mutation and on that basis, to pay tax in respect of the property also. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/25/10