IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 18TH JULY 2008 / 27TH ASHADHA 1930 RP.No. 44 of 2008(B) -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.18707/2001 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS 1-3 IN OP: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A.KISHORE, `ANJALI', KANNAMCODE, VETTIKKAVALA, KOTTARAKKARA. 2. A.SHAFFI, `SAJILA MANZIL', PEYAD, NEYYATTINKARA. 3. P.SURENDRAN, CHANNAMKONATHU PUTHEN VEEDU, VELLANADU, NEDUMANGAD. BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 IN OP: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM-695 001. 2. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, TRIVANDRUM-695 001. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. M.R. SABU THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J ============== R.P.No.44 of 2008 in O.P.No.18707 of 2001 ==================== Dated this the 18th day of July, 2008. O R D E R The original petition was dismissed as withdrawn on the submission made on behalf of the petitioners. Now this review petition is filed stating that such a submission was made wrongly and so the judgment may be reviewed and the petitioners may be given a chance to make their submissions on the merits of the case. 2. I heard the learned Government Pleader for the respondents also. 3. If the submission that the original petition may be dismissed as withdrawn was made wrongly, the same should be reviewed and the petitioners should be given a chance to contest the case. Accordingly the review petition is allowed. Original petition restored to file. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE bkn/-