CT WHAmSBAW. AT W.P.CS) No. 2395 of 2007 Versus Loor Ss'ngh S/o 5hri 6anga Ram Koshyap Age about 39 years, Assft. Teacher (Science) Sovt. ffiris H.5. Schoof, Utai, bistt. - &urq R/o Viliage A Post - Utai (M.egh Market) Tohsil A bistt. - bure ?.) ,•';l '.s.j 1. State Sovt. of Chhatl-issarh, Through : Secr-etary, Schoo! ;ducation Departmsnt, Mantralaya at &.K.S. Bhovan, Saipur (C.$.) The &ir°ect»r,OJrectorate of Public Instruction, Pensionbada, Raipup (C.ff.) 3, Distriet Educotion Officer' istrii If C- (.u.C?.. 'ritPetition ynder'Articie 226 of the Constitution of India :h; h'on'bie Mr. Justiee Satish K. Agnihotri. Present: Mr. Rakssh Anthony, Advocats for the petitioner. Mi*. Arvind Dubey, Pane! Lawyer for State/respondents. ^- ossad on this IS'" Day of Apfii, 2307) 1. The questi'on of law invojved herein is asto whether ths petitioner is entitled to reguiar pcy scate w.e.f. the dcte of initia! appointment or- froffi the date of compietion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitjoner as tife!) as for the State/respondents jointiy submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present wt-it petition are the same as to that of in ^ W. P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. State Sovernment of Chhattisgar'h &others), which was altowed vide opder dated 7.11.2006. 3. In view of the above-stated submissions made by iearned counsel for the parties, -rtie viffit petition is ailowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge ihagh ¥•