IN THE HKarH COURt OF JUDICATURE AT BILASFUR IC.G.) PETITIONER: &? , 3/'\ ^V<-Y;'1 aSM- '.^"•^^^ ....<<€y>" -.'",<n ^' <s Aw J W.l •^-oS^ /2006 Smt. Geeta singh W/o Shri Yashwant Singh, Aged 40 year's Working as Asst. Teacher at Bal Mandir, Nayapara, Jagdalpur Distt. Bastar(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: ^' jl (3 fc ^ 1:.^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Departnient of Tribal Welfare, Mantralaya D.K.S. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Asst. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deparment District Jashpur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- •l.i!£!SBeKJ«^BOT<'a~n-S'?«-.?S ^S:%£E:T^^i&s;'-.^7'^^(@^^^^^S:i£sis.;, ^^••^^'•.:'^:<^!w:s^^^s HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR ^.---, ;T ^ i^ SINGLEBENCH: HON'Bt.EMR.SATISHK.AGNIHOTRI.J. WRITPETmON(S.)N0.70540F 2006 Petitioner : Smt.GeetaSingh versus Respondents : Stateof Chhattisgarh and another Present : Mr.AkshayYadav.eounselfoTthepetitioner. Mr.ArunSao,Goverr)mentAdvocatefortheState/ respondents. ith ORDER (Passed on 19"' Day ofDecember, 2006) t.eamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as atso for the State/respondents jointly submit that th®facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in VhQcase oiYaslw/ant Kumar Bharadwaj vs. Municipal Coifioration, Durg^andanothe^, l?\ ,2, - - lit-subsequent-casest );&?, Wf "Petition (&.) No.5862^ of SX^^IiemantKumarVishfmikarmavsrStatewfeHliaWsgarhaiuf offters) and otherconnected matters, decided by this Courton 12-12- ^006; pureuanttothememoclated 28-1-1995, isstied by ttie Secretar^, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination, itwasclarifiedthatthenomenclatureofthe ^iT..--';' . .yr i«S Bit g%- Baste Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Dtploma in Education, i.e.. D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate hoiders are also covered by the decfsion in Writ Petition (S.) No.5862 of 2006 (Hemant Ku'mar Vlshwakarma vs. State of Chhatfisgaiti and ofhers) (Supra). 3. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of fhe decision of this Court in fte matter of Yashwant Kumar Bha/schvaj (Supra), subject to verffication of the fact as to whether ttie petitioner has acquired D.Ed. Certificate at his ovm expenses as per Uie clreulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-19% and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96 Sybhash