26.cr appa 962-10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 962 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.555 OF 2010 Kishor Vishnu Daroge .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. D.S. Mhaispurkar i/b H.S. Venegavkar for the Applicant Mr. S.A. Shaikh, APP for the State CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J DATE : 9th SEPTEMBER, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicant-original accused no. 2 and learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant-original accused no. 2 has been convicted under Sections 109, 506 read with 34 of IPC. The appeal preferred by him against the said order has been admitted. Now, the applicant is seeking bail. 3. Learned advocate for the applicant stated that the applicant was on bail during the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. This statement has not been controverted by learned APP. On going through the evidence adduced by the prosecution, it is clear that rape 1 26.cr appa 962-10.doc was actually committed by accused no.1 Kailash and not by the present applicant. 4. Thus, looking to the evidence on record, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. Hence, the order: O R D E R 1. Applicant Kishore Vishnu Daroge be released on bail in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- [Rs. Twenty Five Thousand Only] with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The Applicant shall report to the Deolali Camp Police Station once in a month till disposal of the appeal. 2. Application is allowed in above terms. [SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] 2 26.cr appa 962-10.doc 3