IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 5TH DECEMBER 2008 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 35940 of 2008(C) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- N.CHAKRAPANI, 59 YEARS, S/O.LATE NARAYANAN, KAYIPURATH VEEDU, NEAR SMSN HIGH SCHOOL VAIKKAM PO., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, RETD. FIELDMAN, COLLEGE OF FISHERIES, PANANGAD. BY ADV. SRI.V.S.CHANDRASEKHARAN SMT.PRAISHEEL PRAKASAM SMT.BEATRICE FERIA RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, VELLANIKKARA, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.35940/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that, he retired as a field man from the service of the 2nd respondent on 30.9.2003, after rendering more than 22 years of service. He has two grievances. One is that for quantifying his pension basic pay has been taken as 5250/- as against Rs.5,800/-. The another complaint is that by Ext.P6 an amount of Rs.30,073/- has been recovered from his terminal benefits. Raising these complaints he has already approached the Vice Chancellor of the University by filing Ext.P7. According to the petitioner Ext.P7 also has not been considered so far. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, he has raised the aforesaid two complaints before the authorities of the University, they should have certainly dealt with his complaint. 3. Since it is the complaint of the petitioner that Ext.P7 is remaining unattended, I direct the second respondent to consider WP(c).No.35940/08 2 and pass orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. WP(c).No.35940/08 3 ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. WP(c).No.35940/08 4