IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 5595 of 2008 Decided on: 10.09.2010 Manoj Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : None. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The grievance of the petitioner is that though he has worked on the higher post, however, he has been regularized on the lower post. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-State to seek option of the petitioner as per the principles laid down in the judgment rendered by this Court in Gauri Dutt versus State of Himachal Pradesh, Latest HLJ 2008(HP) 366, within a period of four weeks from today. Thereafter, the needful shall be done within a further period of six weeks. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge September 10, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?