1 dgm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7222 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Rahul Kadam with Mr.U.P. Warunjikar for the petitioner. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED : 11.11.2008 P.C. The petitioner has challenged the concurrent finding of fact whereby the both the courts below, after considering the material available on record, held that the petitioner/plaintiff failed to establish his possession the eastern portion of city survey no.460 and, therefore, rejected his application for injunction pending the suit. The appeal preferred by the petitioner also dismissed maintaining the said order. After hearing the petitioner and perusal of the record and the 2 reasoning given the courts below, I see there is no perversity in the matter and need no interference. The petition is dismissed accordingly. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.]