crapln745.11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.745 OF 2011 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2 The Counsel for the applicant submitted that the allegations in the complaint are not true. Even according to the complainant, the alleged incident took place on 18th January, 2011 and the complaint was lodged on 22nd January, 2011. He submitted that the applicant has been wrongly roped in the offence. The applicant is 72 years old. There is no specific act attributed to the applicant. Therefore, the Counsel would submit that the application may be allowed. crapln745.11 2 3 On the other hand, the learned A.P.P. invited my attention to the paragraph 9 of the order of the Sessions Court in which the injuries sustained by the complainant are noticed. The injuries are grievous in nature. The A.P.P., therefore, would submit that the application may be rejected. 4 Upon hearing the learned Counsel for the parties and perusal of the order passed by the Sessions Court and upon perusal of the F.I.R., it clearly emerges that the overt-act is attributed to the applicant herein and also the injuries sustained by the complainant are grievous in nature. However, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, suffice it to say that the Sessions Court has rightly rejected the application for anticipatory bail. However, looking to the age of the applicant, who is 72 years old, it is directed that no coercive action should be taken against the applicant for twelve crapln745.11 3 days from today, so as to enable him to file application for regular bail. In case, such application is filed by the applicant, the concerned Court may dispose of the same, as early as possible. With these observations, application is rejected. Authenticated copy of the order may be given to the Counsel for applicant. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) 18.02.2011. PLK/*