1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1068 OF 1998 Hanil Era Textiles Limited .. Petitioner -versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & anr .. Respondents Mr. M.M. Vashi, for the petitioner Ms Shobha Ajita Kumar, for the respondent CORAM: D.K. DESHMUKH & R. G. KETKAR, JJ. DATED: 11th August, 2009. P.C. 1. The learned counsel for the Corporation stated that if the petitioner makes representation for grant of N form facility to him and also for refund of the amount which according to the petitioner has been wrongly recovered by the Corporation from him, the Corporation will decide that representation in accordance with law 2 and by a reasoned order. This statement is accepted. In view of this statement, in our opinion the petition can be disposed of by passing following order. ORDER. I) Within a period of two weeks from today, the petitioner shall make representation to the Assessor and Collector, Bombay Municipal Corporation, seeking N form facility and also for refund of amount that according to petitioner was wrongly recovered by the Corporation. ii) On receipt of the representation, the Authority shall decide that representation in accordance with law by a reasoned order as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. Iii) The interim order which is presently operating in this petition shall continue to 3 operate during the pendency of the representation and for two weeks from the date of receipt the decision. iv) All the contentions raised by the petitioner, in the petition are kept open. (D.K. DESHMUKH, J) (R.G. KETKAR, J)