IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.134 of 2008 1. Ramesh Pathak, son of late Sitaram Pathak, resident of village- Akona, Police Station- Barahara, District Bhojpur, presently posted as Enforcement Sub-Inspector in the Transport Department, Government of Bihar. 2. Shyamnandan Prasad, son of Late Brijnandan Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Arya Kumar Road, Post Office- Bankipur, Police Station- Kadamkuan, District- Patna, presently posted as Enforcement Sub-Inspector in the Transport Department, Government of Bihar. 3. Rajdeo Singh, son of late Ramanandan Singh, resident of at Post Office- Daulatpur, Police Station- Pathuana, District Patna, posted as Enforcement Sub-Inspector in the Transport Department, Government of Bihar. 4. Satram Prasad, son of late Shivji Prasad, resident of village and post Office- Hathua, Police Station- Hathua, District Gopalganj, presently posted as Enforcement Sub-Inspector in the Transport Department, Government of Bihar. ...... Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Sri Subh Kriti Mazumdar, son of not known to the petitioners, at present Principal Secretary –cum- State Transport Commissioner, Department of Transport, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Sri Madan Mohan Singh, son of not known to the petitioners, the then Principal Secretary –cum- State Transport Commissioner, Department of Transport, Government of Bihar, Patna, at present Managing Director, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna. 4. Sri Kuwarjang Bahadur, son of late Shamsher Jang Bahadur, at present Joint Transport Commissioner (Establishment), Department of Transport, Government of Bihar, Patna. ... Opposite Parties. ----------- 02- 18.02.2010 Heard Mr. Anand Kumar Ojha for the petitioner, and learned Assistant Counsel to Mr. Harendra Pd. Singh, Government Advocate No.6. This application under section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, has been filed by the petitioners of C.W.J.C. No.6441 of 2005 (Ramesh Pathak and others Vs. The State of 2 Bihar and another), and allege non-implementation of the order dated 19.4.2007, whereby the writ petition was disposed of with the direction to respondent no.2 therein to ensure consideration of the cases of the petitioners for promotion in accordance with law and the established procedure within a period of three months. 2. The contemners have placed on record their show-cause, wherein it is stated that the cases of the petitioners were considered for promotion to the next higher post of Enforcement Inspector in the Department of Transport, Government of Bihar, but none of them have been found fit for promotion. The concerned authority has not placed on record copy of the order. I do not feel the necessity of pursuing this application any further. It goes without saying that it will be open to the petitioners to challenge the order in accordance with law. 3. This application is accordingly disposed of. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/