SIN6LE BENCH (^ 1 IN THE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0^%^ OF 2011 PETITIONER : ^ Tikeswar Singh, S/o V. Amol Singh, aged about 55 years, presently posted and working as Deputy Collector, District Janjgir-Champa (CG). Versus RESPONDENTS: /»\^ .A^- ^y. ^••" 'y^y ^' \^' 3. 4. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur Under Secretary, Department of General Administration, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). Collector, Janjgir-Champa (CG). Additional Collector, Janjgir-Champa (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA „^fr^'- T XI-HC—78 ^I^T^T'f^TW '<TS?T ^H^T ^Tqt^T liWtt^ WN^n $b*l8<!b T^T ';:qPTi^R, ^dt^T?, [®l<nKrl ^< ...L'l.a2.3..B.22A(."^200 STI^T-q^F (l^i^^) ^?T?WRf^T^?^ fSB : Hon>ble Shri Maaindra iMohan Slirivastava. J.l 22.7.2011 Shri B.D. Giiru, coi.inse] Shri V.V.S. Murfhy, State/respondents, on advani Heard on admission. loEjer This petition has been correctness and validity ofhi^ 2011 (Annexure P-1). Leamed counsel for fh4 submission ftiat fhe petitioEJe] 29th Januaiy, 2011 and pos Deputy Collector, Janj^r-< relieved and he joined at wifhin a short penod of 2 1/| been transferred, wNch submits fhat fhere are some which included looking afterj retarded sister of ttie petition^r The petitioner has been order dated 13th July, 2011. or his grievance is fhat he has 4>l^fd41^ 'RTH^ff "^ fe^t <PII^K ^aflw^Tl^T for the petitioner. Dy. Advocate General for fhe ;e copy. iled by fhe petitioner assalling the transfer vide order dated 13th July, petitioner assails fhe order on fhe was promoted vide-order dated )ted vide order dated 10.3.2011 as limpa. The petitioner was fhereafter ^njgir-Champa in April, 2011 and months, fhe petitioner has a^dn to frequent transfer. He furfher ^ersonal difficulties of fhe petitioner, an old aged mother and mentafly ^ubjected to transfer vide impugned jlf ftie petitioner has some difficulty been subjected to transfer within a Ch^impa J^njgir- amoilnts T/JY XI-HC—78 ^n^r ^T R^i<^ ^T^ ^l^T^^W Ot i Praveea '755T ^i^id'M, ^^li<o, ^<ni'(-i<j,< ^ITN^I »)NJS»I •^200 ^"?T 1T5W (*i°l?la<<^) ^RTf^T ^1^ ^T^T —1- chl^(d^'l "W^Tf ^f fs^t xf^$K ^3tRm3?I7^T short period of posting, the ri>etitioner shoiild first approach fhe toransfemng aufhority by mo|imig appropriate representation. In the absence of there being an(v allegation of malaflde or illegality, I am not incUned to issuc petitioner, however, may, if fhe transferring authority a^ grounds, which have been such representation is mac consider and decide fhe same notice to the respondents. The advised, prefer reprcsentation to ist the order of transfer on various by hun ua ftiis petition. In case ;, ftie concemed autliority siiall accordance with ftie law within a period of 4 weeks froin the datje of receipt of fhe representatlon. Leamed counsel for the fhe condition of mofher and representation is decided, peti\ petitioner submtts that conslderijig sister of the petitioner, tUl the ioner may be allowed to continue. The petitioner may pray pefore fhe appropriate aufhority f©r stay of transfer till decision oflhis representationywhfch stoall be considered. No coercive steibs be taken till decislon of tiis representation. With the aforesaid oN.enrations, the petition i®finally disposed of. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge