IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Criminal Misc. No. M-3741 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision:04.07.2008 Hardyal Singh .....Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. P.P.S.Duggall, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Jagdeep Singh, Advocate. **** RAJESH BINDAL J. The petitioner in the present case is father-in-law of the complainant. The son of the petitioner/ husband of the complainant expired on 18.7.2007. The wife of the petitioner had also expired prior to that. The FIR came to be recorded after the death of the son of the petitioner and according to the counsel for the petitioner, primary reason for that is the division of the family property for which a civil suit has also been filed by the complainant, which is pending in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Amritsar. The factum that the petitioner has already joined the investigation is not disputed by the counsel for the State. Be that as it may, without opining on the merits of the controversy, interim bail granted to the petitioner on 14.2.2008 is made absolute. The petition is disposed of. July 04, 2008 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) renu JUDGE