THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10477 of 2004 DATE: 28.01.2010 Between: M/s.Weld Fuse Private Limited …Petitioner and The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Nalgonda and another …Respondents COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER : SRI VISHNU TEJA FOR MR.B.VENKAT RAMA RAO COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT : SRI O.MANOHAR REDDY THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10477 of 2004 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, or order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings in letter No.ADE / OPSD / BGR / F.No.BB / D.No.18/04, dt:23.05.2004 for Rs.20,31,673/- and letter No.SE/O.P./NLG/SAO/HT/D.No.98, Dt: 18.05.2004 for Rs.5,82,950/- as arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently set aside the impugned letters Dt:18.05.2004 issued by 2nd respondent and Dt:23.05.2004 issued by 1st respondent with a direction to the respondents to refrain from collecting any back billing amount pursuant to the proceedings in letter No.ADE / OPSD / BGR / F.No.BB / D.No.128/04, Dt:23.5.04 for Rs.20,31,673/- and letter No.SE /O.P. /NLG /SAO/HT/D.No.98, Dt:18.5.04 for Rs.5,82,950/- issued by the 1st and 2nd respondents respectively.” At the hearing, Sri Vishnu Teja, learned counsel representing Sri B.Venkat Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during the pendency of this writ petition, the dispute has been settled out of the Court and therefore, no orders are required to be passed. Having regard to this submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, interim order, dated 24.06.2004 is vacated and WPMP.No.13291 of 2004 is dismissed. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 28th JANUARY, 2010. kvni