IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9926 of 2011-C Decided on: 30.11.2011 Vijay Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents Coram: The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, CJ (oral) The petitioner has certain grievances with regard to his suspension. In the nature of order we propose to pass, it is not necessary for us to go into the merits of the case. A revision is pending before the 4th respondent, Divisional Commissioner, Mandi Division. 2. There shall be a direction to the 4th respondent, Divisional Commissioner to take a final decision on the revision filed by the petitioner, within a week from the date of production of the copy of this order. 3. With these observations, the present writ petition 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Authenticated copy to the petitioner to be produced before the Divisional Commissioner, Mandi Division. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 30, 2011 (Bhupender/Kalpana)