IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M-14725 of 2009 Date of decision : 18.08.2009 Tej Pal Singh ....Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ....Respondent BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Rajeshwar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG Haryana. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the State (on instructions from ASI.amrik Singh, who is present in court) submits that all 39 prosecution witnesses have been examined in this case and the trial is at the stage of its culmination. According to the counsel, the prayer made in this petition is thus, misconceived. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the factual averment made by counsel for the petitioner. In view of the fact that trial is stated to be at the stage of its conclusion, there is no ground made out to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Dismissed. 18.08.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE