IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.360 of 2008 Between: Azeezuddin E.55549, Cleaner/Shramik, S/o.late Nizamuddin, 62 yrs, Hyderabad, Hyderabad District. … Petitioner And The APSRTC., reptd., by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad and 2 others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri S.A.K.Mynoddin. Counsel for the respondents: Sri K.Madhava Reddy. This Court made the following: ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Certiorari to quash order dated 22-8-2006 in M.P.No.64 of 2003 on the file of the Labour Court-I, Hyderabad. The petitioner is an ex-driver, who was retired on the ground of defective vision. He filed application under Section 33© (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for payment of certain amounts, which are permissible for drivers, who retire on account of colour blindness. The said application was dismissed by the Presiding Officer of Labour Court-I, Hyderabad, on the ground that the two circulars, on which reliance is placed by the petitioner, do not envisage such payment to the drivers, who were retired on account of reasons other than colour blindness. The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.4010 of 2009 questioning the said two circulars. Unless the petitioner succeeds in the said Writ Petition, he is not entitled to the relief of payment of differential wages and the application filed by him before the Labour Court falls beyond the scope of its jurisdiction. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue Writ Petition No.4010 of 2009. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:22-4-2009 MNR