THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.4129 of 2008 Dated: 10.11.2010 Between: P.Sambaiah and others. .. Petitioners. And The State, Station House Officer, Narsapuram Town Police Station, West Godavari District, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad, and others. .. Respondents. ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking the following substantive relief: “..Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the charge sheet filed in Crime No.168/07 on the file of the Station House Officer, Narsapur Town Police Station, West Godavari District, vide P.R.C.Sr.No.360/08 dt.22.01.2008 on the file of the Court of the Addl.Judicial First Class Magistrate, Narsapuram, West Godavari District, as the same is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to law and consequently set aside the same as the same is abuse of process of law and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” There is no necessity of going into all the details. It appears, at the initial stage, when a case was registered in Crime No.168 of 2007 on the file of Narsapur Town Police Station, West Godavari District, against the petitioner, the petitioner approached this Court for quashing of the same and obtained interim stay of his arrest in the said case, but however, as there was no stay of further proceedings, investigation was completed and the charge sheet was filed before the Court of Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Narsapuram, West Godavari District, which is numbered as PRC.Sr.No.360 of 2008, and at the committal stage, the present writ petition is filed seeking the relief referred to above. The petitioner, having failed to get the proceedings in the subject crime quashed in the earlier writ petition, filed the present writ petition after the charge sheet is filed. A bare look at the charge sheet filed in the subject crime does not disclose a straight case for interference, and unless and until evidence is let in and trial gets concluded in the said case, it cannot be said that no case is made out against the petitioner herein for the offences with which he is charged. Thus, the charge sheet filed in the subject crime needs no interference of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and, therefore, the writ petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, it is made clear that during pendency of trial in the subject crime i.e., Crime No.168 of 2007 on the file of Narasapur Town Police Station, West Godavari District, the petitioner shall not be arrested for the same offences in respect of which he is facing trial in the subject crime. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 10.11.2010 v v