wp11195.10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11195 OF 2010 Amolprasad s/o Dnyanoba Wanje .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. R.J. Godbole, advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for the State. ===== CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE : 14 th DECEMBER, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Petitioner challenges the order dt. 12-4-2010, on the basis of which, according to the petitioner, termination order has been passed on 15-4-2010. It is the contention of the petitioner that in the appeal which is filed by the present petitioner challenging the termination order dt. 15-4-2010, the learned Tribunal would not be in a position to examine the correctness of the order dt. 12-4-2010. wp11195.10 2 2 We find the apprehension of the petitioner to be wholly baseless. The Tribunal whole considering the order of termination would always be entitled to consider the other matters incidental to such termination. 3 Petition, therefore, stands disposed of with aforesaid observations. ( R. M. BORDE ) ( B. R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb