Crl. Misc No. M 21843 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : September 12, 2011 1. Crl. Misc No. M 21843 of 2011 Harbans Lal and others vs State of Punjab and another 2. Crl.Misc No. M 23839 of 2011 Rachhpal Singh and others vs State of Punjab 3. Crl. Misc No. M 24768 of 2011 Rajan Kumar and another vs State of Punjab *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. L.K.Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners in Crl.Misc No. M 21843 of 2011, for the complainant in connected cases. Mr. R.K.Trikha, Advocate for the petitioners in Crl.Misc Nos.M23869 & 24768 of 2011. Mr.S.S.Gill, DAG Punjab *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This order shall dispose of Crl. Misc Nos. M 21843, 23839 and 24768 of 2011, as these petitions arise from the same occurrence which had taken place between real brothers. In Crl. Misc No. M 23839 of 2011, the following order was passed on 10.8.2011 :- “ Learned counsel has fairly stated that this is a dispute between two real brothers where both the parties have caused injuries to each other and on the complaint Crl. Misc No. M 21843 of 2011 ::2:: of the petitioner side, Ram Kumar alias Bunty and Sanjeev Kumar alias Sanju have been arrested. He has fairly stated that on the side of the petitioner's now Rachhpal Singh petitioner No.1 and Tilak Raj petitioner No.2 shall surrender before the police on 12.8.2011. Notice of motion. Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AAG, Punjab and Mr. L.K.Gupta, Advocate for the complainant accept notice on behalf of the State. Adjourned to 12.9.2011. In the circumstances and on his request, the petition on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 is dismissed as withdrawn with the above undertaking. Arrest of petitioner Nos.3 and 4 shall remain stayed.” Counsel for the respondent, on the instructions of HC Parvinder Singh, as also counsel appearing for the other side viz Mr. L.K.Gupta, Advocate have accepted that petitioners No.1 and 2 in Crl. Misc No. M 23839 of 2011 have since surrendered. Parties are agreed that in this view of the matter, anticipatory bail should be granted to the remaining petitioners. In this view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the remaining petitioners. Consequently, in the event of their request, the remaining petitioners shall be released on anticipatory bail to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Petitions stand disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) September 12, 2011. JUDGE `kk'