THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 9696 of 2009 ORAL ORDER: At the instance of the fourth respondent, the Sub-Collector, Vikarabad Division, the second respondent herein, cancelled the certificate issued to the petitioners under Section 38(E) of the A.P. (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 (for short ‘the Act’), through proceedings dated 7.06.2008. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioners preferred an appeal before the first respondent. Their grievance is that the appeal has not been taken up for hearing and that in the meanwhile, the Tahsildar, Pudur Mandal, the third respondent herein, is trying to dispossess them. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. The petitioners were granted certificates under Section 38(E) of the Act on 28.12.2005. By making reference to various proceedings the second respondent cancelled the same through order, dated 7.06.2008. The petitioners, naturally felt aggrieved by it, and preferred an appeal before the first respondent. The order, dated 7.06.2008 is silent as to the provision under which it was passed or the consequential steps that would ensue out of it. Uncertainty of this nature would certainly impinge upon the rights of the petitioners. It is essential that the appeal preferred by the petitioners, be taken up for hearing without any further loss of time. Hence the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to pass appropriate orders in the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 7.06.2008 passed by the second respondent, duly issuing notice to the effected parties, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is directed that the Tahsildar shall not initiate any steps in respect of the lands vis-à-vis the petitioners in the meanwhile. ______________________ (L. Narasimha Reddy, J.) 1st May, 2009 Js.