IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33027 of 2009 1. DHARMENDRA SINGH @ DHABENDRA SINGH @ BABU SAHEB 2. DHIRENDRA SINGH ALIAS CHHOTU 3. SAKIL AHMAD ALIAS MD. SAKIL AHMAD 4. RAMBHAROSH YADAV ------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 16.11.2009 Heard Counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing for the State and the informant. The First Information Report of Sadar P.S. case No. 266 of 2009 has been instituted for offences under Sections 341,323,504,467,468,384, 120B and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that petitioners executed a forged sale-deed in conspiracy with others in which wrong plot numbers were mentioned and the earnest money was received. The sale deed was executed in the year 1996. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are neither the executants of the sale-deed nor they are anyway connected with them. It is also stated that just to put pressure on the petitioners present case has been instituted as the informant has knowledge that he does not have any civil remedy after such a long time. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the above named petitioners is allowed. In the event of their arrest/surrender within 2 four weeks from today, the petitioners aforementioned shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in Sadar P.S. case No. 266 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar