(1) WP. 496.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 496 OF 2010 Kalim S/o Hanif Shaikh PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. R.S. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.V. Kurundkar, Addl. G.P. for the Respondent-State. ..... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 21ST JUNE, 2011 ORAL ORDER:- 1. The petitioner was working as a driver with the respondent no.5. According to him, great injustice has been done to him since respondent no.5 has not absorbed him in service. In fact, it appears that his services were terminated on 23.6.2008. The petitioner approached the Co-operative Court for redressal of his grievance. It appears that that dispute is still pending. However, his application for interim relief has been rejected on 31.10.2007. (2) WP. 496.2010 2. In the present Petition, the petitioner has sought directions from this Court against respondent no.3, compelling him to issue directions against the Sangh to permit the petitioner to join duties. 3. The learned Advocate for the petitioner was unable to point out any provision in law, whereby such a direction can be issued by the respondent no.3. 4. In our opinion, no case for interference has been made out. Petition rejected. Sd/- Sd/- [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.] arp