IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32779 of 2010 1. RAJENDRA MAHTO 2. SURENDRA MAHTO 3. SHAILENDRA MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 04.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the state. Petitioners are alleged for taking informant’s son to Gujerat to earn his livelihood, but never returned, though, it was informed on their behalf that boy had boarded on a train for his village. Submission of the learned counsel for petitioner is that land dispute was there, which is mentioned in the First Information Report also. So, there was no probability of taking of the boy by these petitioners in connection with job to Gujarat rather he left the village of his own, but not for Gujerat rather for Pune. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Jamo Bazar P.S. Case No. 22 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)