IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41227 of 2010 KARMU CHAUDHARY son of Late Domai Chaudhary resident of village Nikhrail, P.S.Sadar Dagarua, District-Purnea Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.11.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner in custody in connection with Sessions Trial No. 1003 of 2010/ Trial No. 11 of 2010 arising from Sadar Dagarua P.S. Case No.250 of 2008 for the offence punishable under Section 399/402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)A/26/35 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the submissions of the learned counsel that the name of the petitioner had transpired in the present case by reason of a confession made by a co-accused and that several co-accused have been granted bail by this Court including one Natia Sultan from whom several incriminating articles have been recovered by the police party, who has been granted bail by a Bench of this Court in Cri.Misc. No. 20729 of 2009 vide order passed on 24.6.2009, let the petitioner, Karmu Chaudhary be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 3rd Assistant Sessions Judge, Purnea in connection with Sessions Trial No. 1003 of 2010/ Trial No. 11 of 2010 arising from Sadar Dagarua P.S. Case No.250 of 2 2008 subject to the following conditions: 1. that a close relative of the petitioner would stand as one of the bailors and who shall file an affidavit before the Court below indicating his genealogy with the petitioner and who would be under a duty to inform the court below in case this petitioner after his release in the present case is named or is found involved in any further case of similar nature and whereupon the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and take him into custody on grounds of misuse. 2. that the petitioner would ensure his representation before the Court below on each and every date fixed in the case and upon failure on the part of the petitioner to ensure his representation on two consecutive dates fixed without reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the trial Court, would confer liberty on the Court concerned to initiate proceeding for cancellation of his bail bonds and to take him into custody. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J.)