IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- Crl. Misc. No. M – 2950 of 2008 Date of Decision:- 30.1.2009 Naresh Kadian Versus Union Territory, Chandigarh. Present:- Mr. D.S.Bishnoi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sukant Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent. M.M.S.BEDI. (J) (Oral) Petitioner feeling aggrieved by existence of some objectionable material against late Prime Minister of India has sought a direction to the respondents to remove the filthy language drogatory remarks from the Site, and for registration of case under the Information Technology Act, 2000. Learned State counsel has submitted that petitioner has himself addmitted that You Tube site (google) has deleted the objectionable video clipping pertaining to the late Prime Minister. I have seen the police file from which it is apparent that Cyber Crime investigation Cell has looked into the matter and holding an inquiry and arrived at a conclusion that no cause of action at Chandigarh is made out and recommended the filing of the complaint. It has been confirmed that the objectionable material has been deleted. I have considered the facts and circumstance, of this case and I am of the opinion that after preliminary inquiry the complaint has been found to have no substance and that the grievance of the petitioner stands already removed with the deletion of the objectionable material from the site. No direction can be given for registration of FIR in view of judgment of Crl. Misc. No. M – 2950 of 2008 -2- Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rajinder Singh Katoch Vs. Chandigarh Administration & Ors.2007 (Crl) RCR 763 and Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P, 2007(5) Law Herald SC 3910. Petition is disposed of having been rendered infructuous. January 30, 2009 (M.M.S.Bedi) tripti Judge