ifssw^.s s- ISNISU <? y ) -07} IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. fSI No. C)S^ /2007 PETITIONER ^•^' ^•' f. . ^'> N^^. .•^^" :€)^-"r ./ u>-' Bhoj Ram Patel S/o.Shri Dayaram Patel. Aged about 36 years Post-Assistant Teacher R/o. Village -Navapara, Kiritmal, Tahsil Kharsia & District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^:1. ^? State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, R.aipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer, Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G.) 3. WRIT PETITION Block Education Officer Block-Kharsia District-Raigarh (C.G.) U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OR INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS ANDDIRECTIONS HE6H COURT OF WHATTiSeAW A7 BJLASPUft W. P.fSVNo. 955 of 2007 Petitioner : BiojRamPatel Versus Respondents Starte of Chhattisgarh d others Swigle Bench: Hon1>te Mr. Justice Satish K. Agrahotrt. Mr. Anil Mourya, Advoonte for the Petitfoner. Ms. Simita Jain, Ponel Lawyer for 1+ie State/respondents. ORDER (Ptissed on Iftis 20ftl Oay of Februory. 2007) 1. Leamed counsel (ypearmg for the petitioner submits Ihat the petitioner is working as Assistant Taicher in -rtie fiovemment Middte School, Kiritmal, Block arsia, District Raigarh. The petitioner has obtained B.T.I. Exumination certificate m the year 1992, on his cnm e expenses. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for Ihe petitioner aibmits Ihat the question involved. herein asto whether the teacher, who obtained B.TX Exammation Cert-ificate on his own expenses, is entitled to two advance increments. 3. According to leamed counsel for the petitioner, •the petitioner is entitted to two advance increments in view of Ihe decision of •this ® Court in •ttie case of yashwant Kuinar ttianidwa(j Vs. Municipal Corporation. Durg and onuther {20Q6 OJ) WJR-C6 96}. Tliis Court !n the case of YashNCTit Kumar Bh<n-adt«u Vs- Municyal Corppration, ; Durgond another (Supra), came ta the conclusion that •the teachers, wdio had obtounedB. 6d. /B.TX ExaminaEtion Certificate on Itieir owi expenses, are covered by Itie circular dated 24.12.98 issued by Ihe State Govemment of MacBiya Pradesh. 4. Leamed counsel for -the petitioner further aibmits -that the facts ond <piestion of faw involved m the present cnse are squarely wvered by decision of •rtiis Cburt in the case of yashwtmt Kuinar Bharadwy Vs. Municipal Corpcration. Qwy and anothw (&ipra). to which leamed counsel appearmg for the re^>ondents feurly concedes and agrees with the werment made by leamed counwl dppearing for the petitioner. 5. Accordmgfy, the writ petition is attowed m terms of the order passed 'm the case of yash«»ant 16iman Bhamdwty Vs. Nunic^wal Corporation. Dung and a»wther (Supra), subject to verification of • ie factas to whether the petitioner has acquired B.TJ. Examjnation Cert-ificote on his own expenses as per the circutars dated 24.12.19% & 1.3.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Subhash Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge