FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.797 OF 2009 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Mr.K.H.Giri for the petitioner. Mr.Chirag Balsara i/b M/s.Divya Shah and Associates for respondent nos.3 and 4. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATED: 16TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATED: 16TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATED: 16TH FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard Mr.Giri, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Balsara, learned counsel for respondent nos.3 and 4. Though name of the company for Slum Rehabilitation Authority has been shown on record, the counsel is absent. 2. The grievance of the petitioner can be redressed by directing the competent authority constituted under section 3 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 to decide the application filed by the petitioner on 7.7.2007 whcih is at Exhibit-D Page 26 to the petition and, therefore, we direct the compentent authority under section 3 of the said Act to decide the application which is at Exhibit-D Page 26 to the petition dated 7th July, 2007 after hearing the petitioner and concerned persons, if any. The said exercise shall be completed by the said competent authority within a period of eight weeks from today. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the decision of the said authority the petitioner can avail remedy of section 35 and thereafter to appear before the high power committee. The writ petition is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)