IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9720 of 2010 1. MALA KUMARI W/O SRI VIJAY KUMAR CHOUDHARY R/O VILL KOSHIHAN, P.S.CHANDI, DISTT-BHOJPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR , THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE BHOJPUR 3. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER BHOJPUR 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER KOILWAR, BHOJPUR 5. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT GOPALPUR, KOILWAR, BHOJPUR 6. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT GOPALPUR, P.S.KOILWAR, DISTT-BHOJPUR 7. SMT. REETA KUMARI W/O RAJNISH KUMAR CHOUDHARY R/O VILL KOYHAN, GOPALPUR PANCHAYAT , P.S.KOILWAR, DISTT-KOILWAR ----------- 03. 13.5.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the private respondent as well as the State. There might have been a long drawn battle carried on by the petitioner for getting herself appointed on a post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra after the selection was carried out in 2004-2005 but that amounts to nothing, for the simple reason that petitioner never came to be appointed on the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra and the dispute carried on over the years, which also travelled to the Block Development Officer, Koilwar at Bhojpur in terms of the direction of the High Court in the writ petition filed earlier on behalf of the petitioner. Whatever be the background to the said dispute, it is not required to be gone into now because after 2006 Appointment Rules came into effect and after the post of 2 Shiksha Mitra having been abolished w.e.f. 1.7.2006, no person had a right for appointment on the non-existent post. The entire issue now remains academic and to that extent nothing is required to be done with Annexure-3. Writ is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)