CWP No. 962 of 2011 6.7.2011 Present: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate, for the petitioner, Mr. R.M Bisht, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents No. 1 to 3. Admittedly, petitioner had not approached the authorities to assail the appointment of private respondent as an Anganbari Worker within the time stipulated in the guidelines containing the period of limitation which have been upheld by this Court to be mandatory in nature qua the person who himself had participated in the selection process and assailed the appointment. In the impugned order, the Divisional Commissioner after carefully perusing the record has also arrived at such findings. Thus, no illegality or irregularity can be pointed out in the impugned order. The petition is without merits, which is accordingly dismissed. July 6, 2011. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. (priti)