IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1573 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: August 31, 2009. Chander Kant ...Petitioner(s) v. Rati Ram ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri Surender Dhull, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri D.B. Singh, Advocate, for the respondent. ORDER Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): Learned counsel for the petitioner states that some subsequent events have occurred during the pendency of this petition and his apprehensions, as mentioned in para 6 and 9 of this petition, have been proved to be correct as the respondent is trying to raise construction over the land and alienate the same, and for that purpose he wants to plead those subsequent events, therefore, he be granted liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action and this petition be dismissed as withdrawn. In view of the aforesaid request made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is directed to be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action by mentioning the subsequent events which have taken place after the filing of this petition. Rule discharged. August 31, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge