HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: HYDERABAD MAIN CASE NO: W.P.No.14816 of 2008 PROCEEDING SHEET SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 5. 15.12.2010 LNR,J W.P.M.P.No.34063 of 2010 In view of the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this application, it is directed that in the last paragraph of the common order, dated 17.12.2009, in W.P.No.20998 of 2007 and batch, after the words “East Godavari District”, the words “and the Tahsildar, Devipatnam Mandal, East Godavari District, as the case may be” shall be substituted. ________________ 15.12.2010 kdl SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE W.P. No.4885 of 2010 Rule nisi. Call for records. Notice returnable in four weeks. _______________ 25.03.2010 W.P.M.P. No.6285 of 2010 There shall be interim suspension as prayed for, on condition that the petitioner deposits half of the amount assessed against it. The amount, if any, deposited by the petitioner, be it at the stage of appeal or otherwise, shall be taken into account. _______________ 25.03.2010 kdl SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE W.P. No.6835 of 2010 Rule nisi. Call for records. Notice returnable in four weeks. _______________ 25.03.2010 W.P.M.P. No. 8833 of 2010 Even according to the respondents, the disconnection of power supply took place on 05.11.2003 and the consumer is M/s. G.N. Products Limited, which is said to be a private limited company. T h e attachment notice is issued to the petitioner in this personal capacity. Hence, there shall be interim stay, as prayed for. _______________ 25.03.2010 kdl SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE The Joint Collector-I, Ranga Reddy District appeared and stated that he could have written the order in a better way. This Court would not have concerned itself much about the result of the order, but the way in which it was dealt with is really shocking. Being the highest Authority at the District level to implement the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971, the Joint Collector was required to have at least basic ideas of the provisions of the Act before passing an order, which does not fit into the scheme of the Act. The notice sent to respondents 4 to 29 has not been returned served yet. The presence of the Joint Collector-I, Ranga Reddy District is dispensed with for the present. Post on 15.02.2010 in Motion List. SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE _______________ 01.02.2010 kdl SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE W.P. No.823 of 2010 Rule nisi. Call for records. Notice returnable in four weeks. _______________ 01.02.2010 W.P.M.P. No. 1042 of 2010 The petitioners submit that they have been assigned house sites to an extent of Acs.0.03 cents each way back in the year 1993 and thereafter, neither any notices were issued nor any proceedings of cancellation were served upon them. The learned Government Pleader for Revenue submits that the assignments were cancelled on 21.05.2006 and the lands were assigned to the Journalists. The legality or otherwise of the proceedings SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE The legality or otherwise of the proceedings said to have been initiated by the respondents need to be verified. Pending further orders, it is directed that status quo obtaining as on today over the plots that were assigned to the petitioners shall be maintained. _______________ 01.02.2010 kdl SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE W.P. No.1345 of 2010 Rule nisi. Call for records. Notice returnable in four weeks. _______________ 01.02.2010 W.P.M.P. No. 1780 of 2010 Prima facie, it is evident that the i f th l d d li d t th SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE possession of the land was delivered to the petitioner way back on 14.10.2000 in E.P.No.205 of 2000 filed in A.T.C.No.2 of 1991. Those proceedings arose under the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Tenancy Act. The orders impugned in this writ petition are passed under the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Rypotwari) Act, 1956. The possession that has accrued to the petitioner under the proceedings before a Court cannot be disturbed unless it was annulled by any other set of proceedings. There shall be interim stay of dispossession of the petitioner from the land in question in pursuance of the impugned orders. _______________ 01.02.2010 kdl The learned Government Pleader for Revenue shall produce the entire record in relation to the SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE order bearing No.A2/459/2007, dated 15.12.2007, passed by the Special Grade Deputy Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranga Reddy District (East Division) on the next date of hearing. Post on 29.01.2010 in Motion List. Pending further orders, the respondents shall not undertake any demolition of the premises existing upon the land in question. _______________ 25.01.2010 Note: Issue wire at party’s costs. (B/o) kdl SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE W.P. No.674 of 2010 Rule nisi. Call for records. SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE Rule nisi. Call for records. Notice returnable in four weeks. _______________ 22.01.2010 W.P.M.P. No. 844 of 2010 The petitioners state that notices under Section 10(5) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 were issued and against the same, appeals were filed before the appellate authority. It is further represented that though the appeals were dismissed on 04.04.2005, no further proceedings were issued, much less, any possession was taken. There shall be interim direction, as prayed for. _______________ 22.01.2010 kdl SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE