IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5606 of 2011 Jagdish Mahto SON OF LATE BHAGWAN LAL MAHTO RESIDENT OF MUKTI MUHALLA WARD NO. 21, P.O. LAL BAG, BLOCK SADAR, DISTRICT DARBHANGA. Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 2 27/07/2011 The Court will not come in the way of the petitioner filing representations against his claim for grant of time bound promotion but if it comes down to issue of mandamus, the Court has certain reservation in view of the fact that the petitioner retired in the year 2005. Policy of time bound promotion was withdrawn way back on 1.1.1996 and it is only in the year 2011 the petitioner realized that he has to get such a benefit of time bound promotion. This writ application, thus, cannot be entertained at such a belated stage. This writ application is accordingly dismissed due to laches and delay on the part of the petitioner. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)