1 Cri.A.4701.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4701 OF 2011 Bimbisar @ Raj S/o Madhavrao Ranveer, R/o Lyahari, Tq. Hadgaon, District Nanded. ...APPLICANT. VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and another. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Smt. Maya R.Jamdhade,Advocate for Applicant Shri.D.R.Kale,A.P.P. for Respondent-State. ... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 09.12.2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for both the sides. 2. The present applicant is arrested, in connection with Crime No. 130 of 2009, registered with Shivaji Nagar Police Station, Nanded District Nanded, under sections 489C and 201 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Present applicant was arrested by the Police in connection with aforesaid crime on 29.09.2009. 2 Cri.A.4701.11 He was remanded to Police custody till 02.10.2009, however, from clutches of the police present applicant managed to run away and he is rearrested only on 29.06.2011. Thereafter, the investigation had taken place so far as the present applicant. There has been recovery of computer. According to the prosecution, the said computer was used for the purpose of preparation of bogus notes. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant be released on bail, on stringent terms and conditions, which this Court deems fit and proper. She further submitted that present applicant is owner of the immovable property that goes to show that he would not abscond. 6. Learned APP Mr. Kale opposed the application and submitted that if applicant is granted bail, he would not make himself available for trial and would abscond. He prayed for rejection of this application. 3 Cri.A.4701.11 7. Having considered the rival contentions as well as record, the case is made out, as alleged against the applicant, about involvement of the applicant in the crime. Applicant was successful in running away from the clutches of the police. This shows that he has no regard for law. In my view, such person cannot expected any indulgence from the Court. 8. In my view, if the applicant is released on bail he will abscond and he would not make himself available for trial. On this ground, I am not inclined to grant the bail to the applicant. 9. In view of the above, following order is passed on this bail application. (i) Request for grant of bail stands rejected. (ii) Learned counsel appearing for the applicant at this stage submitted that trial be expedited. 4 Cri.A.4701.11 So far this aspect is concerned, it will be open for the present applicant to apply to the concerned Court, before whom the case is pending. Sail Court shall decide the said application on merits. Sd/- [ R.Y.GANOO, J. ] MTK