1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4943 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.476 OF 2002 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4944 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.4756 OF 2002 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4945 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.477 OF 2002 Nathu Tukaram Kadali & Ors. .. Applicants. Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Ms.Bhavna Khemani i/by Mr.P.J. Ahuja for the applicants. Mr.K.K. Tated, G.P. for State. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & J.P. DEVADHAR, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J. DATED : 12th March, 2008 DATED : 12th March, 2008 DATED : 12th March, 2008 P.C. : 1. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. It is not in dispute before us that the original order which permitted the applicants to withdraw the amount had required the applicants to furnish security and not bank guarantee. They, however, furnished bank guarantee and withdrew the amount of enhanced compensation. Now they want to furnish security in place of bank guarantee. 2 2. Liberty to furnish security to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. Upon acceptance of such security by the Court of competent jurisdiction, the bank guarantee can be discharged. 3. All the civil applications are disposed of with no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE J.P. DEVADHAR, J.