IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 424 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 886 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 886 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 886 OF 2006 Sewagiri Shikshan Sanstha .... Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & ors ...... Respondent. And Ashopk Shrirang Yadav and others .... Applicants. Shri A.M.Joshi for the Applicants. Shri M.H.Solkar AGP for Respdt.no.1. Shri Kailas More for Respdt. no.2. Shri J.S.Kini for Petitioner in Writ petition. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 22ND JUNE, 2007 DATED; 22ND JUNE, 2007 DATED; 22ND JUNE, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. By the present application, a prayer for impleadng the applicants as respondents has been made. However, the learned counsel appearing for applicants Mr.Joshi submits that if intervention is granted the same would serve the purpose. There is a dispute as to which group of the management represents majority of the managing committee members of Sivagiri Shikshan Samstha. The four persons who have moved the present application as representing the Samstha are desrious of being heard in the present writ petition. The lerned counsel for the petitioner has no objection if the said four persons are heard in the matter, however, not in the capacity of representing the Samstha. The counsel for the applicants is agreeable for that and hence I am primafacie of the view that if the four persons who have moved this application are heard in the matter, the same would facilitate effective and complete adjudication of the issues involved in the application. Hence intervention is allowed and the four applicants would be heard in the matter. C.A. accordingly is disposed of. .....