IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20389 of 2010 SRI NIWASH PRASAD @ SRINIWAS PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 07.09.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. The First Information Report was instituted against the unknown miscreants when a dead body of unknown male was found by the chaukidar. During investigation, it transpired that the dead body was that of one Dinesh Ram who was the tractor driver and had been killed for purposes of loot of the tractor. Initially, one Ajeet Singh named Pappu Singh contractor but later on the same witness named the petitioner In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. Prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for 2 bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case will not be bifurcated for purpose of commitment or charge and in case it is done prayer for bail will not be considered. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )