IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 13TH JULY 2009 / 22ND ASHADHA 1931 RP.No. 658 of 2009(Y) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.34223/2005 Dated 15/06/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ---------------------------------------------- C.M.SHAMSUDHEEN, S/O.MUHAMMED, CHEMBANDAKATHU VEEDU, PALAPPETTY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE SMT.ACHU SUBHA ABRAHAM RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS --------------------------------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, PONNANI. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL MAJOR SECTION, PONNANI. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, KSEB THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ R.P.No. 658 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C) NO. 34223 OF 2005 (Y) ===================== Dated this the 13th day of July, 2009 O R D E R By judgment dated 15/06/2009, the writ petition was disposed of directing re quantification of the liabilities of the petitioner. 2. In this review petition, petitioner submits that liability was accordingly re quantified and the petitioner paid an amount of Rs.12,157/- in discharge of his dues. However, the power supply is not restored, which according to the petitioner is for the reason that there is no positive direction in the judgment. 3. I heard the counsel appearing for the respondents, who points out Clause 41(5) of the KSEB Terms and Conditions of Supply, 2005 and it is stated that the petitioner has to comply with the requirements of the said Regulation. 4. The aforesaid regulation being statutory, if supply is to be restored to the house of the petitioner, necessarily, the petitioner should comply with the same. Therefore, the review petition is disposed of directing that if R.P.No.658/09 in WPC 34223/05 :2 : the petitioner complies with the conditions of Clause 41(5) of the Regulations referred to above, supply to the petitioner's premises will be restored forthwith. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp