1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2039 OF 2006 Sunil V. Hate Petitioner vs. The Vice-Chancellor University Respondents of Mumbai & 2 ors. Mr.Mihir Desai for the petitioner. Mr.B.V.Phadnis for respondents 1 & 2. Mr.Pradeep Jadhav, AGP for respondent no.3. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED : 24th November, 2006 P.C. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that before the Grievance Committee took a decision which has been communicated to the petitioner on 30th January 2006 he was not given any opportunity. Considering the above, we set aside the office order dated 30th January 2006 and remand the matter back to the Grievance Committee to give an opportunity to the petitioner either to file his reply and or any oral hearing and thereafter pass an appropriate order according to law. The petitioner to file his reply before the Grievance Committee within two weeks from today. The Grievance Committee after giving an opportunity to the petitioner herein and the 2 complainants to pass an appropriate order according to law not later than eight weeks from the petitioner filing his representation. 3. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. ( F.I. REBELLO, J.) F.I. REBELLO, J.) F.I. REBELLO, J.) ( ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. ) ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. ) ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. )