^ z ^1^ ^l^i Bl ,.^1 PET!TIQNERS ^' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 3'T? OF 2010 SERVICE MATTER WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRITIN THE NATURE; OF CERTIORARI MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION AND/OR A SUITABLE DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER ^ 1. Pyarelal S/o Shri Bhuneshwar Prasad, Nishad, aged about 52 years, Helper in (E&M), Irrigation Department,Raipur (C.G.) (Chhattisgarh) 2. Bholanath Shukla, S/o Shri Banchhor Shukla, aged about 49 years, working as Helper (E&M) Irrigation Department, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS ..^ ^^ ^"..^'-<./ .cK^y ^'..•^o~\y"'' ^^ RESPONDENTS ^ State ofChhattisgarh, through: Secretary, ^f^- Water Resource Department, 4/atebb3)-i£-s. Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. The Superintending Engineer, E & M Division, Irrigation Department, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. The Executive Engineer, (E&M) Light Machinery Division, W.R.D. Raipur(C.G.) -frteat4/Vefere District BeejapUF.(C-G7) DETAILSOFTHEPETmON < '-HC-78 wrar^qT^ \3-Dq ^qi^|0<l, y-rfl^^lci, RriW^ ^_\^,t^^^^l2^\0 3n^5TcOTR^Jch ^CT3TI^5Td)+licb Tumane 3TT^9Tq^cp (ijclijeltg) ^scT ?;RTT^R^rf^T3TT^5T SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mo 25-01-2010 Shri Sandeep Dubey, cour Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Heard. Learned counsel appearin may be disposed of at this sta< (Annexure P-6) passed by the stated that as and when direct F€ be benefited. tn view of foregoing, the p^ petrtioner stilt survives, he would| recourse to remedy available to i^el for the petitioner. povt. Advocate for the State/respondents. '- for the petitioner submits that this petition fee, in view of the order dated 16-06-2009 i|espondent authorities wherein it has been jcruitment takes place, the petitioners would ^tition stands disposed of. Ifgrievance ofthe be at liberty to approach this Court to take lim under the law. cpi<<lc^<i1ri +ii+ic)T ^'{^»-£1^Ri^i<< ^3lRl^3TT^$T an Shrivastava, J. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge