IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX INCOME TAX INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1244 OF 2008 APPEAL NO. 1244 OF 2008 APPEAL NO. 1244 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax. ... Appellant. V/s. M/s.Aldowiet Engineering Pvt.Ltd. ... Respondent. J.S.Saluja for the appellant. S.J.Mehta for the respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. and V.C.DAGA, JJ. and V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED : 14th November 2008. DATED : 14th November 2008. DATED : 14th November 2008. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The learned counsel for both parties categorically state that the questions of law raised in the above appeal have been squarely answered by the judgment of this Court in the case of C.I.T. v. Neo C.I.T. v. Neo C.I.T. v. Neo Pharma Pvt. Ltd. Pharma Pvt. Ltd. Pharma Pvt. Ltd., 137 ITR 879 against the revenue and in favour of the assessee. In view thereof, appeal stands dismissed. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)