IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CAW NO. 427 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3277 OF 2009 (Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Nagpur vs. M/s. O.G. Bajaj Construction, Nagpur) with CAW NO. 428 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3122 OF 2009 (Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Nagpur vs. M/s. G.N. Nikam, Nagpur) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. FEBRUARY 10, 2010. Heard Shri Wachasunder, learned counsel for the applicant/ respondent and Ms. Tamma, learned AGP for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the parties were heard at length and thereafter orders were passed on last date in open court. The grievance then made was in relation to total exemption of pre-deposit. No grievance about final disposal was made at that stage and even today there is no such grievance. Case of Sandeep Dwellers was also considered and this Court has found that the order by which the condition of pre deposit came to be waived is unsustainable. The reasons therein are also recorded in the said order. The contention that the Hon’ble Division Bench observed on particular lines cannot be the ground for recall before this Court. The Division Bench has given option to the respondent – applicant to approach this Court for recall. No case is made out warranting any interference in the matter. Civil Applications are, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE *GS.