l..-f"'lAr" ^^s^f-- ..-••" ^:.^^^ ^e-- ^e- 0-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION (C) No^Z-3^ /20ii PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Mukesh Kumar Singh, aged about 37 years, S/o Someshwar Nath Singh R/' Prema Bag, Ward No. 13, Jail Road, Baikunthpur Distt. Koriya 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 2 The Collector, Distt. Koriya, Baikunthpur 3. Sub Divisional Officer (Rj/Nazul Officer, Baikunthpur Distt. Koriya. 4. Tahsildar, Baikunthpur Distt. Koriya. ^•"aBh. XI-HC-22 ^Sse^y X-^ ^^£s^/<^>' i-o' "y an^T^T f<;-<i.<* 3)1^?I Slltliqi^rfTO Tsg -iit<iid'li, a>Ti1<i<is. fawi+iy SIT^TJI^? IO'KC) 1^> •W^'il)! "HT. 200' *<i*<c(Tai<irai ^•B^T' ai^TTCnwHfer 28-04-2011 Shn i-'arag Kotecna. counsel r< snn Arun Sao, uovernment aavance copy. The petitioner has nied this D< of me respondent NO.S in not aecidi P/Ss and yil} maae !n complianc vv.P.No.2209/06 and further that w regard to entitlement of me petit Droceeaings to aemoiisn structures rs it is tne case or tne pemioni kuchha house on an area of 921 Sq BaiKunthpur and ressaing v/im nis fai claims Denerit ot Denenciarv poiicv ci unaer Vi/nicn, p'oor ana lanaiess perj their favour. According to the petiti< ana patta nas been granted to varioM Annexure P/2 along with the petitlon.l No.2209/06, which was finally dlspo^ writ petrt'on, tnss uoun airectea tne rt Kevenue / Nazui omcer. BaiKuntno) peiitioner, in accoraance wrtn tne nc| yanani Asnrav 'foina, wimin a peri petrtioner tnougn, ne suDmmea req roiiowea DV anoiner remsnaer / re; ct)l<lI<v)<ft'T "RTR^ff ^ 1^rat ^i-^R '^srPtpTsn^i me Detrtioner. hdvocate for the State/respondents on Itition, a.ggrievea DV inaction on tne part te petitioners representation (Annexure of order dated 27/4/06 passed in thout deciding the representation wlth 0ner, tne responaents nave inrtiarea ised. that tne petitioner has consiructea a Ft. of land bearing Khasra No.520/1 in niiv for tne last zu years. l ne petrtioner the State Goyernment (Annexure P/1) >ons are proposea ror grant or pana in ler, tne scneme nas oeen impiementea Dersons. which are collectivelv filed as The petitioner eariier filed a writ p^tition ed off vide order daied 27/4/06. In that 'spondent No.3 - Sub-Divlsional Ofncer, ', to conslcter tne represemation or tne •ms ana auiaeiines conainea in Kajeev )d ot tnree montns. Accoraina to me •esentation on lB/5/uy (Annexure !-'/&) resemation aatea ,s;B/3/n to me SUD- [Tt3?fea I—. •1 . \. ,,y>s^ -v -^jsgiiesag g^ v'-:'" J ftil-HC-ll sn^r^ii Wi* sii^i ^)*T tifea Usepis -TcT ^liqi^^, riTflti'lri. ("Idl'My .?1T^9T 'qST^ ..b.).:..e..:..£)..;l^o.:..'s>s3>^/" "WI. 200 *fl*R-(T Shliqi fsre^si' 311^1 ?^IRR'•HfCT 5- ch(^41l Mw^ ^ T^,^\ ^R(T^3.1'< ^3lf;OT 311^1 Divisionai Officer, neither anv decisioh has been taken nor anv aliotment has Deen maae in his ravour. unce tnss uourt nas airectea (ne responaent N0.3 to taKe aecision on petitioners representation in accorflance wren tne norms ana guideiines containea in Raieev uanani Asnrav comDiv witn the oraer ana taKe a ssructure, witnout laKina anv action se proDer. ! nererore, l here&v airect Neeaiess to emphasize, in ca 'oina, rssc-onaent No.3 is autv Douna to Idecision. Any action to demolish the <l>n Detitioners reDresentation. wousa not Iresponaem No.3 to scrupuiousiy compiy the order dated 27/4/06 pasfeed in W.P. No.2209/06. Unless the representation is aeciaed, tne respor(aent shaii not proceea witn any coercive action or ctemolition OT the structure rtlsea in the occuDation of the petitioner. se, the petiuoner is not sansfied with the decision of respondent No.3, he m^v take recourse to remedv, as mav be avaiiabie to him under the iaw. wnn me aroresaia oDserv^tions/airecuons, tne petiuon ia Tinaiiy Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [TftS^q