IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 10373 of 2005 Between: BA HULA WILLIAM S/o. John, Christian R/o. Q.No. 49(1), Nurses Quarters, Govt. Head Quarter, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Secretary, to Government, A.P. Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner Of Police, Hyderabad. 3 Superintendent Of Police, Karimnagar,Dist. 4 The Station House Officer ,Police Station Karimnagar Town-II, Karimnagar Dist. 5 G. Hanumantha Rao,S/o. Venkata Subbaiah, Managing Director, Leo Employment and Education Consultancy, PVT Ltd. Regional Office 8- 3-903/7B Nagarjunanagar Opp. Community Hall, Ameerpet. Hyderabad. 6 Muthyala John Prakash, S/o. Premanandam, Executive Director Leo Employment and Education Consultancy PVT. Ltd, Karimnagar Branch R/o. 3-1-370, Christian Colony, Karimnagar. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to May be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the action of the official respondents 1 to 4 in not taking the action against the 5th and 6th respondents in not registering F.I.R and not conducting enquiry and not seizing the 5th respondent offices at Ameerpet Hyderabad and karimnagar respectively and not seizing the records and not arresting them for the recovery of huge amount collected from 30 unemployees from Karimnagar more than Rs.25 lakhs under the name of provinding employement Foreign countries and do the needful Justice to the victims is illegal, improper and amount to negligent and Violation of Fundamental rights of the petitioner and consequently direct the official respondents herein to register the FIR against the 5th and 6th Respondents under Section 420 and other relovent sections of 2PC and conduct the enquiry to seize the offices of the 5th respondent and records and recover the amount from the 5th respondent immediately and to pay the same to the vicims and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.SAIDA RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: When the matter was called on 24.04.2008, none appeared and hence, it was posted to next week under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also none appeared. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:01.05.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{CTMP}