IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.3411 of 2007 Date of decision: December 19, 2008 Shingar Singh & another ... Appellants Versus Smt. Gurdip Kaur & others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. M.S. Bedi, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. P.C. Suman, Advocate for the respondents. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) This appeal has been filed against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the Courts below upholding the Will made in favour of the respondents while disbelieving the Will made in favour of the appellants. The question regarding the proof of the Will is concurrent finding of the fact. Learned counsel for the appellants has not been able to persuade me that these findings of fact cannot be held to be perverse or not arising from the material on record. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed. No costs. December 19, 2008 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE