BailAppl 9111/07 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH [1] S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9111/07 Smt. Soni Devi Versus State [2] S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.182/08 Geeta & Anr. Versus State [3] S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.181/08 Hem Chand Gehlot Versus State DATE OF ORDER : 06/02/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Naveen Kumar Sharma ] for accused-applicants Mr. S.S. Sunda ] Mr. R.P. Kuldeep, Public Prosecutor *** Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the case diary. All the three bail applications have been filed by applicants who are accused in FIR No.221/07 which was registered against them for offence u/ss.420, 467, 471, 419 & 466 IPC. It was alleged by the complainant who happens to be member of their family that parental property which initially belonged to her father whose name was shown in the revenue records, later on was mutated by accused-applicants in their names and the same has simultaneously been sold to the accused persons on 5th/6th January, 2007. All are BailAppl 9111/07 [2] ladies except co-accused Kalu as informed to this court he has been released on bail u/s.439 Cr.P.C. by learned trial Judge. As regards the Bail Application No.181/08 filed by Hem Chand Gehlot who happens to be the Patwari who has opened mutation in the name of accused persons on the basis of Pedigree which was duly signed by Sarpanch in discharge of his official duties. Taking note of facts on record and so also fact that they are illiterate ladies belong to same family and Kalu has already been released on bail. Without going into merits of the matter, this court is of the opinion that no purpose is going to be served in arresting the accused-applicants. Taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I allow the bail application of the applicants U/s 438 Cr.P.C. Therefore, the SHO/IO of Police Station Nasirabad Sadar, District Ajmer is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicants [1] Smt. Soni Devi, [2] Geeta, [3] Teeja & [4] Hem Chand Gehlot in FIR No.221/07, registered U/ss.420, 467, 471, 419 & 466 IPC he shall enlarge them on bail BailAppl 9111/07 [3] provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- to his satisfaction on the following conditions: (i) They shall make themselves available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when requires; (ii) They shall not directly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any Police Officer; (iii) They shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA9111Bail Application2007 6-2.doc