IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 17231 of 2004 Between: 1 V. Jagadish Narayana, S/o Satyanarayana, R/o Housing Board Colony, Jammi Kunta, Karimnagar District. 2 K. Ganesh, S/o Bixapathi, r/o Vidyanagar, Huzurabad, Karimnagar District. 3 B. Upender, S/o Venkatram Narsaiah, R/o Vidyanagar, Huzurabad, Karimnagar District. 4 E. Suresh, s/o Rajeshwar, R/o Vidyanagar, Huzurabad, Karimnagar District. 5 V. Murali, S/o Venkataiah, R/o Premnagar Colony, Hanmakonda, Warangal District. 6 P. Dasharatham, S/o Veeramalle R/o Pochammakunta, Hanmakonda, Warangal District. 7 D. Sridhar, S/o Mallaiah, R/o Employees Colony, Jammikunta, Karimnagar District. 8 R. Rajendra Prasad, S/o Narender, R/o Reddy Colony, Hanmakonda, Warangal District. 9 D. Sagar, S/o Balraju, R/o Mankammthota, Karimnagar District. 10 K. Srinivas, S/o Laxmi Narsaiah, R/o Sultanabad, Karimnagar District. 11 G. Praveen Kumar, s/o Yesurathnam, Tirumalagiri, Nalgonda District. 12 D. Pranitha, D/o Saranga Pani, Vidyaranya Puri, Hanmakonda, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. of A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad - 500 001. 2 The Commissioner & Director of School Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in not conducting Ed.CET, for English Methodology on par with other Methodologies as arbitrary, discriminatory and illegal and consequently direct the Respondents to conduct forthwith Ed.CET to English Methodology in terms of G.O.Ms.No. 60 Edn dt. 12-7-2002, as has been done in respect of other Methodologies and with all other consequential benefits monetary and otherwise and Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.JAGAPATHI Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION FOR R1&2 The Court made the following : ORDER: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the subject of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:21.04.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{AVLR}