IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34470 of 2008 NAVIN KUMAR @ NANHE son of Suresh Prasad Singh, resident of village- Patori, P.S.-Akbarpur, Dist. Nawada. Versus STATE OF BIHAR and Anr. ----------- 3. 13.1.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner is an accused of a case which has been registered for the offence under section 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 and 120b/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant has alleged that the petitioner has realized money but has not sold the correct land which was of the petitioner. Submission is that land owned by the petitioner has been mutated by annexure-4 and land sold to the informant has been mutated by annexure-7. Annexure-4 and annexure-7 are quite different. The mutation of plot no.887 is in the name of the petitioner and the plot mutated in the name of the informant is 886. Considering the allegation I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected. Md.S. (Shyam Kishore Sharma,J.)