Q2> Petitioner Resoondents <*. HISH COURT OF CHHATriSOARH: BtLASPUR Writ Petttion N0.3741 of 2004 Lachhi Ram Verma. S/o. Chamru Prasad Sharma, aged about 72 years, resident of village Chouranga, Tehsil Slmga, District Raipur (CG), Versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the •Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mantralay, D.K.S. Building, Raipur (CG). 2. The Chhattisgarh Environmental Conservation Board, through its Chief Engineer and OSD Raipur (CG). 3. Co!lecter,Raipur (CG). 4. Sub Divisional Offlcer (R) Simga, District Ralpur (CG). 5. Deepak Agrawal, M/s. Raipur Spunj & Power Limited, 6 Prem Kunj, Clvil Line, Raipur. . 6. The tndustries Commissiorter, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). 7. Union of India, through Ministry of Commerce and !nc!ustries, Secretriate for Industriai Assistanoe Publio Relation and Complaint Section New Delhi (through its Secretary). (Writ Petitionunder Article 226/227 oftheGonstitutionoflndia.) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: None for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panei Lawysr for theState. Ms. Sharmila Singhai, Assfc Solioitor Qeneraf for Un'on of India. QQUffi ORAL ORDER (Passedon this SPdayofAugust, 2008) The matter is called for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appears nor is any representation made on behalf ofthe petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. 2) In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissal for want of prosecution. SdA i Satish l£Agnihdtri Judge |