1 CAC No.27/08 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.27 of 2008 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION ST.NO.28410 of 2007 Mr.Shaikh Usman Shaikh Ratan ... Applicant versus Smt.Roshanbi Mohammad Yousuf ... Respondent ... Mr. Roshan S. Tanna for the applicant Mr. Mahesh Subramanian i/b S.V. Pitre for the respondent. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 2nd February 2011 P.C. 1. This is an application for condonation of delay of nearly 2 years in filing of the revision application. The impugned order was passed on 13 January 2006. The revision application has been filed on 3 December 2007 i.e. after lapse of nearly one year and 11 months. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant had first filed a writ petition no.2158/06 challenging the impugned order which was later on withdrawn and that has resulted into delay. The writ petition was withdrawn on 24 August 2007 and the civil revision 2 CAC No.27/08 application is filed on 3 December 2007 i.e after expiry of three months of the withdrawal of the writ petition. When asked about the reason for this delay, the counsel inviting my attention to paragraph 6 of the application submitted that certified copy was obtained after the decision of the writ petition and that has resulted into the delay. Counsel for the respondent disputes this statement and states that the statement is incorrect. He invites my attention to the certified copy filed with the civil revision application. The endorsements of relevant dates made by the court issuing certified copy shows that the certified copy shows was applied on 17 January 2006 and was delivered to the revision applicant on 6 February 2006. i.e long before even filing of the writ petition and it has not been obtained after the decision of the writ petition. Thus, a false statement has been made that in paragraph no.6 of the application for condonation of delay that certified copy was applied after the decision of the writ petition. Civil Application is therefore liable to be rejected on this ground of falsity of statements made in the civil application and is accordingly rejected. (D.G.KARNIK, J)