IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-2315 of 2009 Date of decision : 6.3.2009. ... Bhullan @ Ashlam ................ Petitioner vs. State of Haryana .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. G.C. Shahpuri, Advocate for the petitioner. Sh. Ashok Kumar Jindal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated at the Bar that inadvertently Section 396 IPC has been mentioned in place of Section 395 IPC in the heading, as well as, in the prayer clause. He prays for necessary correction. The prayer for correction has not been opposed by the learned State counsel. Registry is directed to make the necessary correction. Petitioner has applied for grant of bail in FIR No. 415 dated 24.12.2007 under Sections 395, 397 IPC registered at Police Station Sadar, Palwal, District Faridabad. As per allegation of the prosecution, accused alongwith other 6 persons has committed robbery of a truck containing 183 bags of gram and 17 bags of Arhar. Crl.M. No. M-2315 of 2009 -2- The accused is stated to be in custody since 7.1.2008. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Paras Ram, has stated at the Bar that material witnesses have been examined and they have not supported the case of prosecution. Only official witnesses remain to be examined. No recovery has been effected from the accused. So, bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court with two local sureties of heavy amount. ( K.C. Puri ) 6.3.2009. Judge chug