s> ^r raju .^ Petitioner ^ HIGH COURT ORCHHATTISGARH: BIIASPUR WritPetition(S) No. 1890 of 2009 Nilesh Kumar Jaiswal, S/o. Shri tehok Jaiswal, aged about 25 years, r/o. Ward Near Jaiswal Bhawan, Boauripara, Ambilapur, P.S. & Tahsil - Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. Respondents 1. 2. 3. Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through Secrrtary; Department of Rojgar Guarantee Yozna, Vltes Bhawan, Civil Lines, Ratpur,ehhath'sss>rh: Commissioner, Rqjgar Guarantee Yojna, Vtkas Bhawan, eivilLiness, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Divisionat Commissfoner, Sarguja.CG. Sarguja, Di^. Present: (Wrtt Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutitm of Indis^ SB: Hon'bleMr. SaUsh K.Agnihotri,*). Mr.Pankaj Shrhrastava, Advocate forttie peBfioner. Mr. ArunSae, Govt. Advasata forthe State. ORALORDER (Passed on tKi»27th day of March 200&) Learned counsel appearing for the petMoner submits that the petttioner does not want to contest this matter on merit at this sts^e. However, representation dated 22-12-2008 (Annexure PI3) pending before the respondent authorities may bedireeled to b®considered and declded, in accordance wtth taw. 2) Mr. Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate appearing for the responctente/State fairiy submits that the aforesald represerrtation' filed by the petitionw shall be considered and deckled, in accordance w'rth law on ite own merit wittiin a period of four weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy ofthis wder. 3) In View of foregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for Ihe petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication in ttiis peUtion. 4) Accordingly, this petition standsdispTOedof. Satis^^^ w 3udse K- ^^-i