IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-30882 of 2009 Date of decision : March 15, 2010 Rajesh Malhotra ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another ....Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Vivek Chauhan, AAG Punjab for respondent no. 1 Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate, for respondent no. 2 L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) Petitioner's wife is present in person and has handed over custody of Krishnam male minor child to its mother respondent no. 2 complainant (who is also present in person in Court) now before the Court and therefore, respondent no. 2 has no objection, without prejudice to the merits of the case, if interim order of anticipatory bail of the petitioner is confirmed. As per settlement between the parties, the custody of the aforesaid minor child shall remain with respondent no. 2. In view of the aforesaid but without expressing anything on merits, interim order dated 22.12.2009 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( L.N. Mittal ) March 15, 2010 Judge 'tiwana'