CWP 11152/2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH SB Civil Writ Petition No.11152/2010 Lokesh Dadhich Vs. District and Session Judge(Disciplinary Authority), Bundi. DATE OF ORDER : 16/08/2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Narendra Mishra, for petitioner. The petitioner, who is working as a Reader in a Judicial Court in Tonk Judgeship, was served with a charge-sheet under Rule 16 of the CCA Rules alongwith memorandum dt. 30/07/2010. After the explanation was submitted by the petitioner, enquiry officer has also been appointed. Counsel submits that the order was dictated by the Presiding officer and has not been recorded by the petitioner and as such if there is anything wrong in the order sheet or otherwise, the same could not have been attributed to the petitioner and only to save the Presiding Officer with whom the petitioner is attached the charge sheet has been served upon the petitioner. A perusal of the charge sheet along with statement of allegations, prima-facie discloses a misconduct which has been committed under the Conduct Rules, 1971 and what has been urged by the petitioner may be his explanation but that CWP 11152/2010 [2] cannot be looked into by this Court at this stage since the matter is pending before the Disciplinary Authority and the explanation furnished by the petitioner has to be examined by the enquiry officer after affording opportunity of hearing in terms of the procedure provided under Rule 16 of the CCA Rules, 1958. Expressing any opinion at this stage, may prejudice the case of either of the parties. This Court refrains to record any opinion in regard to the submission made. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed at this stage. However, if any prejudicial order is passed against the petitioner, he is always at liberty to avail remedy available under law. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. Raghu-11152-CW-2010-final.doc