IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15592 of 2008 1.RIKESH KUMAR son of Rabindra Prasad Yadav, Resident of village- Belhar, P.S.-Belhar, Dist.-Banka, presently posted as Junior Engineer, Matasay Bibhag-cum-Incharge N.E.R.P. Madhepura 2.Navin Kumar Singh son of late Upendra Narayan Singh, resident of village-Nirpur, P.S.-Dhamdaha, District- Purnea, presently posted as Assistant Engineer NERP Madhepura. …… ……Petitioner Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Mithilesh Kumar Singh son of Anirudh Prasad Singh, resident of village-Chandsaua, P.O.-Basanbara, P.S.-Alamnagar, Dist.-Madhepura ……. …..Opp. Party. ----------- 2. 25.6.2010. No one appears on behalf of the petitioners. Two petitioners, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this court under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, have prayed for quashing of the order dated 7.3.2008 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, in Complaint Case No.C562 of 2007. By the said order the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offences under sections 406, 420 and 467 of the Indian Penal Code. I have perused the impugned order and I do not find any error in the order. Moreover, at this initial or interlocutory stage in a criminal proceeding it is not desirable to interfere with the order that too while exercising inherent jurisdiction under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which is to be exercised in exceptional cases. It need not to be elaborated that Code of Criminal Procedure is a self contained Code and there is remedy available in the Code to raise the point at an appropriate 2 stage and, accordingly, it is not proper to interfere with the order of cognizance, while exercising power under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court is satisfied that while taking cognizance, the learned Magistrate has committed no error. Accordingly, I do not find any merit in this petition and the petition stands rejected. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)