WP(C) 6748/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI Heard Mrs. A. Devi, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. G. Soren, learne d Government Advocate, Assam, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 7. Als o heard Mr. S. Sarma, learned Government Advocate, Manipur, appearing on behalf of respondent No.2. As sought on behalf of the petitioner, the name of the respondent Nos.5 and 6 ar e hereby struck off the cause title of this writ petition. This writ petition is essentially directed against the warrant of attachment, wh ich has been issued by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Imphal, Manip ur, pursuant to the order, dated 23-01.2008, passed in Crl. Misc. Case No.41 of 2007, which arose out of two complaint cases, namely, Crl. (c) Case No.55/2004 a nd Crl. (c) Case No.18/2005, whereunder the premises of respondent No.4 has been directed to be sealed and kept under lock and key pending further necessary ord er. Pursuant to the said warrant of attachment, the premises of respondent No.4 has been attached. The petitioner’s grievance is that the land, in question, where the premises of respondent No.4 stand located, was given, on lease, to the respondent No.4 by th e present petitioner. The petitioner, thus, becomes a lessor and the respondent No.4 a lessee as far as the transaction between the petitioner and the responden t No.4 is concerned. The grievance of the petitioner is that due to the attachme nt, which has been ordered, the petitioner is unable to give the said land, on l ease, to anyone and has, thus, not been able to utilise the land, though it (the petitioner) is the owner thereof. The petitioner contends that in this regard, the petitioner has filed some applications in connection with the aforesaid comp laint cases seeking appropriate directions from the learned Court below, in the cases being Crl. (c) Case No.55/2004 and Crl. (c) Case No.18/2005. According to the petitioner, all these applications have been kept pending by the learned Add itional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Imphal. Without expressing any opinion with regard to the correctness or otherwise of wh at have been contended by the petitioner, this writ petition is closed with the direction given to the learned Additional CJM, Imphal, to take up all the petiti ons filed, in the said cases, by the petitioner herein and pass thereon appropri ate order(s) in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to al l the parties concerned. The learned Additional CJM, Imphal, shall expedite the hearing of the said applications and dispose of the same, preferably, within a p eriod of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by the lear ned Court below. Send a copy of this order to the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, I mphal. The petitioner may furnish to the learned Court below a certified copy of this o rder along with a copy of the writ petition and annexures thereto. The writ petition shall accordingly stand disposed of.