IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2242 of 2007 VIJAY KUMAR SAHNI @ VIJAY SAHNI Versus SOBHA DEVI ----------- 3. 26.9.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. This Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order granting Rs. 500/- per month by way of maintenance pendente lite under section 24 of the Hindu Marriages Act and Rs. 100/- per day by way of cost of litigation. The plea of the petitioner that he is a daily wage earner, an unskilled labourer, would not mean that he cannot pay even this much of amount which would be bare minimum amount for maintenance of any person. That being so, this Court would not find any error in the impugned order. This application is, accordingly, dismissed with a direction to the petitioner to pay the amount both arrear and current as fixed by the trial court. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/