THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 4723 of 2010 Dated: 08.11.2010 Between: Sri Bheemeswara Timber Depot, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND Adivishnu Vital Rao, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 4723 of 2010 ORDER: Revision petitioner is the defendant in O.S.No.24 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Tanuku. The respondent herein/plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of money. The defendant/revision petitioner filed a written statement contesting the suit claim. After framing the necessary issues, the trial has commenced and admittedly the plaintiff’s evidence is over and even on behalf of the defendant, D.W.1 was examined. At that stage, the defendant filed I.A.No.619 of 2010 under Order 16 Rule 7 of C.P.C. with a prayer to issue summons to the authorised person of one M/s. Vel Murugan Timber Industries for producing the ledgers, accounts and income tax returns relating to the years 2003-2006 pertaining to the plaintiff’s concern as well as the defendant’s concern and to give evidence. It was claimed that the defendant’s concern had purchased the wooden logs directly from the said M/s. Vel Murugan Timber Industries and the amounts were also paid in the year 2003 which would be clear from the ledgers, accounts and income tax returns of the said Vel Murugan Timber Industries. The Court below dismissed the said application holding that the evidence already produced shows that the amount was paid by the defendant to the plaintiff from time to time and therefore, there is no need to summon the authorised person from M/s. Vel Murugan Timber Industries for producing the records. Challenging the said order dated 02.08.2010 in I.A.No.619 of 2010, the present Revision Petition is filed by the defendant. Having heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, I do not find any justifiable reason to hold that the order passed by the Court below on appreciation of the material available on record suffered from any legal infirmity warranting interference by this Court in exercise of the jurisdiction conferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. _____________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 08.11.2010 KLP