—F 114 HP MI I QUiT 0’ <ARXAflK AT %NW. qp D’JED ?HE l6!M D%Y OP JZiNU%iY 1998 3! WORE ?HE HO JLE A. rJStCE Y. 1:IkSick RAG CIVIL EVI°I0U 2. .2flQL. NO.2568/1992 Snt. Rudra.ria, aged 55 years, w/o on. a. ii 1114 hart, No.fl4, I Stage, Basaveswaranagar, Bangalore 360 079. .R. (2: Sri. P.IC. ‘Jij4y, Mv. for PetitLoner) eVSe 1. ont. Muniaina, agcd 75 years, w/o la’e N.njundachiri, (/0 Jeczabhad..achari, Janatha Colony, Yaranda Hal i, len iag*ra Post, Jiqani ‘4obli, Anekal ‘aluc, ...an;ilaze list. 2. °-it. rsama, aged 57 years W/o Ruiracian, Yarandahalli, Henragara Pbst Jgari ‘4obli, Anekal raflk, Bangalore Dist. Pin 562 106. 8 t%Ofl . •b - fl Co • • i. 0 • g w H’ ID H’ I OwwW I-. ‘000 U. 000.0 UI Pt g * rn’s • 0 * .1 * ‘3 Sb 0g 0 • ‘1 II I 0 H’ UI It 00 V • F • • Sb ‘3 the plaintiff—petitioner filed suit for partition claiming share in the disputed property and also obtained interim: inj unction pending suit not to alienate the land or to encumber or damage the land, After notice is served, defendant obtained loan from the bank on the disputed property encumberi.ng the said pz.operty, therefore he filed IA for contempt, same s : penc..ing, As bank has granted loan pending suit, he filed present suit to implead bank. Court below erred in not impleading bank, Bank granted: loan to defendants not claiming any right over the land. If the defendants demand loan violating order of court below it is for petitioner to go for contempt and court below will also proceed in accordance with law, I do not see any ground to interfere with order of court below, flence, petltlor stanas dismissed, Sd,”— JUDCE, Cery 170y gM - r —‘ C by: jje-J t14 / -4t_-- R b :‘,‘, -