IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 23RD KARTHIKA 1929 WP(C).No. 33550 of 2007(R) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- M.T.SUNIL KUMAR,S/O.LATE THANKAPPAN AGED 44, MATTAPPILLI HOUSE, PANAMPUKAD DESOM, MULAVUKAD VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.A.BALAGOPALAN SRI.A.RAJAGOPALAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL LINES, KAKKANADU, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE TAHASILDAR, KANAYANNUR TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, ERNAKULAM. 3. TALUK SURVEYOR, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 33550 OF 2007 R ===================== Dated this the 14th day of November, 2007 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that on the strength of Ext.P1, he had purchased 17 cents of land within the boundaries indicated in Ext.P1 document itself. It is stated that thereafter a re-survey was conducted and on measurement, extent of the land was found to be only 13.5 cents. In view of this reduction in extent, petitioner submitted Ext.P2 application before the 2nd respondent requesting for measurement of the land in his possession. Inaction on Ext.P2 is complained of in this writ petition. 2. Since Ext.P2 has been received by the 2nd respondent as is evident from the endorsement on the document itself, I see no justification for the inaction on the same. Accordingly, I dispose of this writ petition directing the 2nd respondent to take up and deal with Ext.P2, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of receipt of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp