WP 2903/11 - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2903/2011 Radhakisan Dhanaji Wagh. ...Petitioner.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents... ..... Shri Y.V. Kakde, Advocate for petitioner. Shri B.V. Wagh, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 4. ..... CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE: 25.04.2011 PER COURT : Heard learned counsel for the parties. By way of present petition, the petitioner prays that his representation may be decided, which is in connection with restoration of his kerosene licence. It is required to be noted that the order regarding restoration of the licence in favour of the present petitioner is the subject matter in Writ Petition No.10893/2010 filed before this Court. The said petition is filed by contesting licence holder of a different area. The learned Single Judge of this Court has admitted that petition, but has not granted any interim relief to the said writ petitioner. The grievance of WP 2903/11 - 2 - the present petitioner is that even though there is no interim order, the authority is not giving any quota to the petitioner. In our view, when the main issue is already pending before the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.10893/2010, it would not be appropriate to entertain the present writ petition. However, the petitioner is given liberty to approach the learned Single Judge by filing appropriate application in the said writ petition. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that even though no interim relief is granted to the petitioner in Writ Petition No.10893/2010, yet the authority is not restoring kerosene supply to the present petitioner. It is required to be noted that parallel proceedings regarding the same subject matter is not required to be entertained. If any application is filed by the present petitioner, it is for the concerned learned Single Judge to consider the same in accordance with law and as deemed fit and proper. We express no opinion except giving liberty to the petitioner to move the learned Single Judge by making appropriate application. In view of above, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move the learned Single Judge in connection with the grievance raised in the petition. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) (P.B. MAJMUDAR, J.) ndk/c2541125