VS&S^ .^^^3 li!^1^"....-•••""*" C^'' ••••"" <.;iy-"'v^7-..-••"" 9&f>.. «^u< ^6A"I;IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBILASPUR tCHHATTISGARHt WRIT ^ET!TIQN_NO^ b'-r-r/2006 PETITIONER / T?T dM^ ^^w< el^?6^ CLEUKtoA.G.BILASPUR^^ ^Binda Bai, aged about 27 years, W/o Punaram By Caste Satnami, R/o Arjuni, Tahsil and Distt. Janjgir Champa RESPONDENTS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Department, Raipur. C.G. / 2. The Collector, Janjgir (Champa) ^3. Project Officer, Ekikkrat Bal Vikas Pariyojna, Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir Champa 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir Champa WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^^BBi XI-HC-22 •s^ ^{Fn?ra, '^gRT'i®,l^ray 3H^I^?[ •f^fra'sii^t Wqt?;^fCT H/- y^ -?AU ^' sii^f.'g^iiw^itei ^TqfeNh im^f •? feA ^T a?f5gi:i aiter 3-4-2006 Shri Parag Kotecha, counsel for[1 Shri A.S. Kachhawana, Govt. no.1 to 3. Heard. The present petitions bearint 646/2006 and 647/2006 have been f| order dated 22/12/2005 passed by [ wherebythey have been removed from| Return tias been flied by ,r< Nos.645/2006 and 646/2006 aod it is 647/2006. Aiongwith the return, coj 31/3ff006 (Annex.R/4) issued by res( beenfilech , It is sybmitted bythe Statecourtl |the matter and tili the inquiry is heic iprogramme oniy has been taken away in view ofthe above, learped c< |wimdraw these petitions with liberty leventualityarises. Accordingiy, these petitions star iihe iiberty as prayed for. the petitioners. A|dvocate, for the State/respondenis W.P.Nos.644/2006, 645/2006, |ed by the petitioners against the respondent no.S/Project Officer, IthepostofAaganbadiWorkers. . sspondents no.1 to 3 in W.P. ^dopted in W.P. Nos.644/2006 and \>y of the amended oraer ,dated tondent no.3/' Project Officer has ^' >el fhat-the inquiry is beirig hefd.in I, the work of National Nutrition rom tne petitioners. (unsei for the peutioners wants to |to file afresh in case such an fd disposed of as withdrawn with Scl/- Fa'(hruddin Jucfge [^^Rrt