IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 9266 of 2008. Decided on 8th December, 2010. _____________________________________________________ Ramesh Kumar. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. J.R. Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 3. : Mr. R.P. Singh and Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate Generals. Respondent No. 4 is already exparte. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner is seeking promotion to the post of Clerk against 10% quota. It has come in the reply that till date the persons senior to the petitioner have not been considered for promotion against 10% quota. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of petitioner for promotion to the post of Clerk against 10% quota as and when the post becomes available according to seniority. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 08, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.