IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD WEALTH TAX APPLICATION No 14 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Versus SAJJANSINH N. CHAUHAN, -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. WEALTH TAX APPLICATION No. 14 of 1999 MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner No. 1 MR KM PARIKH for Petitioner No. 1 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE Date of decision: 31/01/2003 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI) The following question of law arises from the order of the Tribunal. "Whether the appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in holding that the right to the enhanced compensation could not be included in the assessment of the wealth of the assessee for the year in question? The Tribunal is directed to forward the statement of facts with the above question that arises from its order. Rule is made absolute accordingly with no order as to costs. [R.K. ABICHANDANI, J.] [A.L. DAVE, J.] pirzada/-