hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2094 OF 2010 Smt. Sarojini Tanaji Shitole and Others ... Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ... Respondents Mr. L.S. Puntambekar for Petitioners. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, A.G.P. For R. No. 1, 2 and 4. Mr. Shankar Thorat for R. No. 3. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATED : JULY 01, 2010 P.C. Heard counsel for the Petitioner and Respondents. In the present petition, the Petitioner has raised challenge to the award passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer way back on 21.7.2006. The counsel for Respondent No. 3 states that the amount of compensation in respect of the land of Petitioner of Rs.91,23,000/- is already deposited in the treasury. In view of these facts we see no reason to show any indulgence at such belated stage that too when there being no specific legal ground pointed out to us in this regard. The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks liberty to take appropriate steps in accordance with provisions of section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. It is open for the Petitioner to take steps as per the procedure stipulated u/s. 18 of Land Acquisition Act in accordance with law. With the above observations petition disposed of. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) (D.D. SINHA,J.)