IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-23905 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:09.08.2011 Pawan Kumar . . .Petitioner Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Vivek Khatri, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This is a petition for pre-arrest bail in a case registered vide FIR No.4 dated 1.1.1994 under Sections 25, 54 & 59 of the Arms Act at Police Station City Hisar, District Hisar. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he was a juvenile at the time of occurrence whereas the learned Court below while dismissing the bail application has observed that it is a matter of enquiry by the learned Illaqa Magistrate as to whether the petitioner was juvenile or not but the petitioner has been found to be absent from 26.9.1994 and was declared proclaimed offender on 2.1.1996. He has remained absent from the Court from 16/17 years. In view thereof, I do not find it to be a fit case for anticipatory bail, hence, the same is hereby dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) AUGUST 09, 2011 JUDGE Vivek