IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (1) Review Application No.49-CI of 2010 in R.F.A. No.2249 of 2003 Date of Decision: 19.11.2010. Madan Lal and others ...Appellants Versus The State of Haryana and others ...Respondents (2) Review Application No.50-CI of 2010 in R.F.A. No.2256 of 2003 Date of Decision: 19.11.2010. Madan Lal and others ...Appellants Versus The State of Haryana and others ...Respondents (3) Review Application No.51-CI of 2010 in R.F.A. No.2589 of 2003 Date of Decision: 19.11.2010. Smt. Devi Bai and others ...Appellants Versus The State of Haryana and others ...Respondents (4) Review Application No.52-CI of 2010 in R.F.A. No.2270 of 2003 Date of Decision: 19.11.2010. Smt. Phoolwati and others ...Appellants Versus The State of Haryana and others ...Respondents (5) Review Application No.54-CI of 2010 in R.F.A. No.2273 of 2003 Date of Decision: 19.11.2010. Smt. Jamna Bai and others ...Appellants Versus The State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Shailendra Jain, Advocate, for the applicants-appellants. Mr. B.S. Saini, Sr. D.A.G. Haryana, for the respondent-State. NAWAB SINGH.J. Exemption Applications Allowed as prayed for. Delay Applications For the reasons mentioned in the applications, the same are allowed. Delay of 156 and 159 days in filing the review applications is condoned. Review Applications Since in all the above mentioned five review applications bearing Nos.49-CI to 52-CI and 54-CI of 2010 order dated April 26th, 2010 passed by this Court in R.F.A. No.1505 of 2003 titled- Zile Singh vs. State of Haryana and others, is sought to be reviewed, so the same are being disposed of vide this common order. The review is sought on the short ground that 60% cut to the valuation assessed was on higher side. The order dated April 26th, 2010 has been perused. While assessing the gross value of the acquired land at the rate of ` 2013/- per square yard, this Court considered sale deeds Exhibits P- 7, P-29 and P-4 dated May 23rd, 1992, December 7th, 1992 and July 7th, 1994 of land measuring 60, 8 and 24 square yards for an amount of ` 900/-, ` 2600/- and ` 2541.50 ps per square yard respectively. Since the sale instances related to small piece of land, therefore, cut of 60% was applied to the aforesaid valuation and the market value of the acquired land was assessed at the rate of ` 805/- per square yard. In considered opinion of this Court, the ground on which the review applications have been filed is without substance and the applications are, therefore, dismissed. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 19.11.2010. SN