IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 23RD NOVEMBER 2009 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA 1931 OP.No. 23334 of 2002(C) ------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ KAMCO EMPLOYEES' FEDERATION (AITUC) REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE-PRESIDENT, A. SHAMSUDDIN, KAMCO, ATHANI. BY ADV. SRI.A.JAYASANKAR SRI.C.ANIL KUMAR SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, AGRICULTURE (PU) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. KERALA AGRO MACHINERY CORPORATION LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, ATHANI P.O.-683 585. ADV. SRI.A.M.SHAFFIQUE FOR R2 THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN,J. --------------------- O.P.NO.23334 OF 2002 ------------------------------ Dated this the 23rd November, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking implementation of Ext.P4. A counter affidavit has been filed stating that Ext.P4 has been withdrawn with retrospective effect by Ext.R2(a). The petitioner therefore seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge Ext.R2(a) in appropriate proceedings. 2. Permission is granted and writ petition is dismissed with as withdrawn with liberty to challenge Ext.R2(a), if the petitioner is advised to do so. I also record the averment of the counsel for the respondents that subsequent to the same, a settlement was also entered into between the parties, correctness of which is disputed by the counsel for the petitioner. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE mns