IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 21ST JUNE 2010 / 31ST JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 18488 of 2010(I) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- K.R.VIJAYAMONEY, PRINCIPAL, RAJARSHI MEMORIAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, ALOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE, BY ADV. SRI.S.SUJIN, SMT.NITA.N.S. RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, IRINJALAKUDA. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THRISSUR. 3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM. 4. A.K.RITA, TEACHER-IN-CHARGE RAJARSHI MEMORIAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, ALOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. SANDESH RAJA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.18488/2010 I APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE BYE-LAW APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT REGARDING THE STAFF MANAGEMENT. P2: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 27/07/2009 SUBMITTED BY THE TEACHERS TO THE DEO. P3: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD. 7/09/2009 IN WPC NO.25028 OF 2009 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. P4: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B4/3763/09 DTD. 12/11/2009 ISSUED BY THE DEO, IRINJALAKUDA. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P. (C) No. 18488 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 21st day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is the Principal of the Rajarshi Memorial Higher Secondary School, Aloor. This writ petition has been filed mainly with the following prayers:- (i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 1st respondent to direct the 4th respondent Teacher-in-charge to take steps to amend the bye- law to include the 'Higher Secondary Section also in the bye- law and to show the Principal of the Higher Secondary School Section as the person in Management of the School; (ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, direction the 1st respondent DEO to direct the 4th respondent to comply with the direction issued as per Ext.P4 and in the event of failure to do so to take appropriate action against the 4th respondent for non- compliance of the Department's directions 2. When this matter is taken up today, the learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent made available a copy of the letter written to the first respondent dated 16.6.2010. It would reveal that the main grievances of the petitioner raised in this writ petition have been redressed. It would reveal that the 4th respondent has already amended the bye-laws and forwarded it to the first respondent for appropriate action. WPC.18488/2010 : 2 : In the light of the said subsequent developments, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to take appropriate steps in the matter expeditiously, in accordance with law. Sd/- (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge