..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1684 OF 2008 1. Rakesh Lilaram Rohira, 2. Maya Lilaram Rohira, 3. Lilaram Harchadraj Rohira, 4. Ashok Lilaram Rohira, 5. Sanjay Lilaram Rohira, & 6. Mrs.Lata @ Krishna Ashok Rohira. ..Applicants. Versus State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .... Mr.S.V.Marwadi, Adv. for the applicants. Mr.H.J.Dedia, APP, for the State. Mr.D.R.Sanghavi, Adv. for orig.complainant. .... ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1783 OF 2008 Mrs.Priyanka Rakesh Rohira. ..Applicant. Versus State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .... Mr.Devang R. Sanghvi, Adv. for applicant. Mr.S.V.Marwadi, Adv. for orig.complainant. Mr.H.J.Dedia, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 12th August, 2008. DATED : 12th August, 2008. DATED : 12th August, 2008. P.C.: 1. Leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. ..(2).. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties and the learned APP for the State. Applicant - Rakesh and applicant - Priyanka both are present in person. 3. Applicant Rakesh in Criminal Application No.1684 of 2008 is the husband of Priyanka who is the applicant in Criminal Application No.1783 of 2008. Both the husband and wife are seeking anticipatory bail. Applicant Rakesh and others are seeking anticipatory bail in C.R. No.I-215 of 2008 of Nasik Road police station. The said case is mainly under Section 498A and 306 of IPC. The said FIR has been lodged by Priyanka. The applicant Priyanka is seeking anticipatory bail in C.R. No.197 of 2008 of Powai police station at Mumbai. The said case is under Sections 420, 465, 468 of IPC. 4. During hearing of these applications, the applicants stated that they do not wish to continue with the prosecution lodged by them against each other. Priyanka has stated that she does not wish to continue with the prosecution of her FIR. So also applicant Rakesh has stated that he does not wish to continue with the prosecution of his case i.e. C.R. No.197 of 2008. It is the case of Priyanka that her ..(3).. jewellery weighing about 62 tolas and her clothes are lying at her matrimonial house. Mr.Marwadi, on instructions, denies this fact. However, now Mr.Marwadi states that without prejudice to the rights and contentions of applicant Rakesh he is willing to deposit Rs.5 lakhs in this Court and the said amount may be transferred to the Family Court as and when the proceedings are instituted by the parties. The said amount of Rs.5 lakh will be deposited within four weeks from today. 5. Looking to the above facts and looking to the fact that the dispute is in between husband and wife, I am inclined to quash the proceedings in both the cases. C.R. No.I-215 of 2008 of Nasik Road police station and C.R. No.197 of 2008 of Powai police station at Mumbai are quashed. In view of the fact that both the cases are quashed, the prayer for anticipatory bail would not survive. It is made clear that if the amount of Rs.5 lakh is not deposited within four weeks from today, this order shall stand cancelled and both matters shall stand revived. 6. Both Criminal Applications are disposed of ..(4).. accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)