IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23416 of 2011 Dangal Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02. 17.8.2011 On 18.5.2011 prayer for bail of the petitioner was allowed. The Court recorded that one of the sureties will be executed by the father of the petitioner and other by a close relation. After the order was passed, a petition for modification has now been filed stating that due to typographical mistake error crept in the petition, in the sense that father of the petitioner was already dead and in view of the same no surety can be executed by the father. The Court has gone through the record and this fact seems to be correct but since the fault lies with the petitioner and this aspect was not pointed out at the time of passing of the order, such a condition was laid down. Today a supplementary affidavit on behalf of the petitioner has been filed duly sworn by one Adalat Singh who is stated to be the elder brother of the petitioner and is willing to take responsibility of the petitioner in place of his father. The modification petition is allowed. The order dated 18.5.2011 is modified to read that one of the surety will be executed by Adalat Singh, son of late Tulsi Singh, the so-called elder brother of the petitioner. It is clarified that the court below will satisfy itself about the 2 identity of the brother of the petitioner named above. Rest of the order dated 118.5.2011 relating to Chandi P S Case No. 179 of 2010 pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa (Nalanda) shall remain the same. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)