W EEG}! CQURT O? CHHATTESGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 2236 ofZOOl PE'I‘I'E‘IONER : Samay Lal Devangan S/o Shri Bhondu Ram Devangan, aged about 45 years, R/o Vii]: Buchi Hardj, PO. Balaudaa Tah: Janjgeer, Disi‘t:_ RESPONDENTS Janj geer-Champa Chhattisgarh. VERSUS :1. Siate of Chhattisgarh, Through its Pn'ncipal Secretaly, School Education Department, State Secretariat, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Director, Lok Shikshan (Public Education) Thought School Education Department State Secretariat, DKS Bhawam Raipur, Chhattisgarh. p) 3. Joint Director; Lok $hikshan (Public Education) Eilaspur, Chhattisgarh. I VVRJT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF iNDiA SB: Hon’ble bhri Satish K. Agnihota'i. J. Present: Shri MKBaeg, Advocate for the petitioner. _ Ms. Sunita Jam, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. QRAL GERBER (Passed on 07‘“ day of Juiy, 20%) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to contest the matter on merit at this stage, howevet, the petitioner prays that the representation dated 16.12.1998 (Annexure P/5) and 22.05.2G01 (Annexure P/7) may be consiciered and decided in accordance with law: on its own merit, as eweditiously as possibie, to which learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents has no objection. Learned counsel appearing for. the State/respondents submits that in the event the above-said representations are not on record, the representations cannot be considered, In that event, a fresh copy of the said representations may be . submitted, thereafter the same shaii be considered and decided as early as possible, preferably within a period of Sweeks from the date of receipt ofthe copy ofthe above stated representations. In view of the foregoing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives in this matter. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sdl' i i Satish K. Agnihotri i LR Judge Amit "