IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.1153 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:29.10.2010. Subhash Chand ...Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Sanjay Dhiman, Advocate, for the appellant. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. The plaintiff is in second appeal against the judgment and decree of the Courts below by which his suit for declaration that he is entitled to promotion to the post of Machineman from the date his junior Jasbir Kaur was promoted, has been dismissed. Shorn of unnecessary details, the suit of the plaintiff/appellant has been dismissed for the reason that the plaintiff had not impleaded Jasbir Kaur as a party to the suit though there is only one post for Machineman on which she was appointed in the year 1993 and her civil rights were bound to be adversely affected in case decree is granted by the Court in her absence. Learned counsel for the appellant has miserably failed to find fault with the judgment and decree of the Courts below nor could he raise any question of law much-less substantial in this appeal as envisaged under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. In view thereof, I do not find any merit in the present appeal and as such, the same is hereby dismissed. No costs. October 29, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE