The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Contempt Case No.1610 of 2011 Date: 16-12-2011 Between: Gopal Rao Karankoti ..... Petitioner AND T.Krishna Babu, Commissioner, GHMC, Hyderabad and 2 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.K.Ramakrishna Counsel for the Respondents: Mr.C.Damodar Reddy, SC for GHMC The Court made the following : Order: This Contempt Case is filed alleging willful disobedience of Order, dated 18-08-2011, in WP.No.14964 of 2011, by the respondents. The petitioner herein filed the aforesaid Writ Petition with the grievance that the respondents have not left any set backs while seeking to construct a community hall adjacent to his house. By interim order, dated 18-08-2011, this Court has restrained the respondents from raising construction without leaving set backs as required under the statutory requirements and the bye-laws. Alleging that the respondents have not left the set backs as directed by this Court and been proceeding with the construction, the Writ Petitioner filed the present Contempt Case. In the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.3, it is inter alia averred that they have left the set back of 1 meter to 4.25 meters on the western side of the community hall where the petitioner’s house is situated and that a set back of 1.75 meters is maintained on the southern side, while there is open space of about 15 meters on the northern and eastern sides. It is further alleged that the petitioner owns 467 square yards in plot Nos.107 and 112, but he is found to be in possession of 626 square yards by encroaching upon the park area of Anupama Nagar. The learned counsel for the petitioner seriously denied the said allegation. While this Court does not intend to deal with the allegation that the petitioner encroached upon the park area, from the averments contained in the counter-affidavit and the photographs shown by Sri C.Damodar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, representing the respondents, this Court is convinced that the respondents have not violated the interim order of this Court. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed. However, if the respondents feel that the petitioner has encroached upon park area, they shall take appropriate steps for his eviction, in accordance with law, after giving notice to the petitioner. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 16th December, 2011 LUR