IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1689 of 2009 NAVEEN CHAUBEY . Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR . ----------- 5. 8.12.2009 I.A. No.2242 of 2009 at flag ‘A’ This application has been filed for condonation of delay in filing the revision application. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that delay occurred in filing the revision application because petitioner went to his sasural along with his wife(complainant) and had fallen sick there. But brother, who is the pairvikar of the case, of the petitioner had no knowledge about his going to sasural and sickness and he was under the impression that petitioner might have been kidnapped. Later, when he got the knowledge of his whereabout then process under sections 82 and 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was issued against him and his father and he took initiation to file revision petition but in the meantime limitation has already expired. Considering the reasons stated, the condonation petition is rejected. As a result, the revision petition also stands rejected. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh,J )