c...^ \yr^^ B©rseh IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.fC) Ho^L1 OF 2009 Petitioner : / / Mukesh Kumar Thakur, S/o /^' r Panchram, aged about 38 years, $ ..v^" ..•'' Presently posted at Upper Division ^.^^ .•'* Teacher, Government Middle School l^.. Sangandih, Tahsil Pakariya District- Kabirdham (C.G.) %ly ....•^y -..r "..^ ^" ^.^f/' ' ^"^••'" i?^>- Respondents ^S^KS^^ ^^;.a ^y-^ £''^—y ..^ ^"\ ..^. <?'' \ l*te:lrl VB^'%; Versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Department of School Education, U.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) < 2. District Education Officer, District Kabirdham (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Block Kabirdham, District KabirDham (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA w^r ^T R-tW* ^T ^IT^T 'iib^i^ WWItS^WW "S^( ';:Wf^[^,^^WT'S, [®j<rtl^^< ^^...^j£.^l.:^2.k, 200 ^f^ <q?^T (^^^) ?^TW^^3ff^r SB: Hon. IVir. Justice l?r|tinker Diwaker 01.07.2009: Shri P.M. Sriwas, Shri Yashwant Genera! for respon 6.4.2005 passed by this petitioner is working on ^T^ri^? ^nwff ^^^ I^R^ ^3^RR 31^1 (^ounsei for the petitioner. ^ingh Thakur, Dy. Adovocate ijJents/State. Counsel for the p^titioner submits that the present petition may be dispose|jof in terms of the order dated &ourtinW.P. No. 1890/2003. Counsel for the p^titioner submits that though the the post of Assistant Teacher from the date of his JnJfiaJ appointment but he has not been given the regular p^iy scale. He further submits that the petitioner may be aiicpwed to make a representation to the respondent No. 1 1|o give similar treatment to the petitioner and the sarr^e pay scaie which has been sanctioned to other sjmil^rly situated teachers on account of the order dated 31 Administrative Tribunai counsel for the State has .1.2000 passed by the State in O.A. No. 1452/98, to which no objection. ^H^N ^^rsf ^T T<WTf?TTRr—FS/95—1 1 /2-008—1,00,000. ^•:.^^ /^/^ ^%^yfK-.78 ^l^t'^T'f^ti^ >?^T 317^T ^^I^ •^^ c^ ^^ 'ysf ^i^xri^, ^Til-(-ili<o, fsi<ni^^< -2 <<I*WT tbNI^) "^200 3^1 TI^^ (^t^^) wnw 1Rft^ ^T^T Accordingly, th^ for the petitioner make a representatio today to the respond therein. On such <^F?f^SN "RTR^* ^ ^^ <psi^s< ^3ff?m^?i^r limited prayer made by the counsei ^ppears to be reasonabie and accordingiy it is allo^ed. The petitioner is permitted to \\ within a period of two weeks from ^nt No. 1 raising all his grievances |representation being made the respondent No. 1 sh^li decide the same in an objective manner within a perij3d of 30 days from the date of its receipt considering a^l the points raised by the petitioner and taking into acccjunt the order dated 31.1.2000 as mentioned above. If jtS^e petitioner stands on the same footing, he be aiso s^nctioned the same pay scale and senjority. With the directjons aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge