1 17-caw-698-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY srj CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.698 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3865 OF 1999 R.M. Munde .. Applicant V/s. Peico Electronics & Electricals Ltd. & Others .. Respondents. Smt. Anjali Helekar, for the Applicant. CORAM : K.K.TATED, J. DATE : 20th APRIL, 2011. P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the Applicant. 2 This application is preferred by Original Petitioner for re- calling the order dated 6th December, 2010 passed by the Registrar (Judl.-I), dismissing Applicant’s Petition for not providing present full and correct address of Respondent No.1 company. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant submits that the above 2 17-caw-698-11.sxw mentioned matter was notified before the Assistant Registrar (Civil) for removing office objection on 6th December, 2010 at Sr. No.903. The said matter was not notified on the board of A.A.W.I. and no intimation about the matter was given to his Advocate by her Clerk. For want of knowledge, no one appears when the matter was called out before the Assistant Registrar (Civil). The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant submits that Applicant is ready to provide the present full and correct address of Respondent No.1 company. 3 Considering the submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant and avements made in the Civil Application, the order passed by Registrar (Judl.I) dated 6th December, 2010 is set aside. Writ Petition No.3865 of 1999 restore on the condition that Applicant to provide present full and correct address of Respondent No.1 company within two weeks from today. If Applicant failed to provide present full and correct address of Respondent No.1 within stipulated period, Civil Application be treated as dismissed. 4 Civil Application disposed off accordingly. (K.K.TATED, J.)