IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2007 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1930 WA.No. 903 of 2007() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.8333/2007 .................... APPELLANT: PETITIONER ---------------------- A.CHANDRAN, SHINE NIVAS, P.O.KAVIYOOR, CHOKLI, THALASSERY. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR. BY SR. G.P. SMT. K.MEERA THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, Ag. C.J. & M.N. KRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- W.A. No. 903 of 2007 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DT. APRIL 3, 2007 JUDGMENT K.S.Radhakrishnan, Ag.C.J. The appeal is filed against the order refusing regular permit by the R.T.A. on the ground that overlapping of the modified route Kannur-Kudiyanmala and the route length exceeds 140 k.m. for granting ordinary point. With regard to the first ground the appellate authority found in favour of the applicantt. So far as the objection that the route length exceeds 140 kms., a submission was made before the STAT that the applicant is prepared to modify the application. But no application for modification was submitted, but instead he applied for a permit to operate as a fast passenger. It was not accepted by the R.T.A. and the application was rejected by Ext.P4 order. Aggrieved by the same he has approached this court. We see no error in the order passed by the R.T.A. Writ appeal is dismissed. K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN (Ag. CHIEF JUSTICE) M.N. KRISHNAN, (JUDGE) mt/- mt/-