IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.97 of 2003 Date of Decision 08.09.2010 Mahboob Akhtar ...... Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab ...... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Dhirender Chopra, Advocate, as Amicus Curiae, for the petitioner. Mr.Amit Chaudhary, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent-State. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL): Challenge in this petition is to the judgment dated 05.10.2002, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Bathinda, dismissing the appeal, preferred by petitioner-accused against the judgment dated 18.02.2002, passed by Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Phul, convicting him under Section 269 IPC and releasing him on probation. Heard. The rival contentions considered. The period of probation stands already over. Even otherwise, the impugned judgment sans any illegality much less irregularity or perversity, warranting interference by this Court. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. Amicus Curiae would be at liberty to claim the remuneration from the competent authority as per rules. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 08.09.2010 mamta-II