IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.644 of 2008 RAJENDRA SAH S/O LATE LAKHU SAH OF CHAKAI BAZAR, P.S. CHAKAI, DISTRICT JAMUI …………..PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. COLLECTOR, JAMUI 3. LAND REFORMS DEPUTY COLLECTOR, JAMUI 4. SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, JAMUI 5. ANCHAL ADHIKARI, CHAKAI, JAMUI 6. ANCHAL AMIN, LAXAMIPUR BLOCK, DISTRICT JAMUI 7. OFFICER-IN-CHARGE CHAKAI POLICE STATION, JAMUI 8. RAJESH KUMAR S/O KAMDEO CHAUDHARY OF VILLAGE SIMARA TILLAH, P.S. CHAKAI, DISTRICT JAMUI ……….RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 2.3.2009 This application has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 12.2.2008 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Jamui in Case No.1016M of 2007. While dropping the proceeding initiated under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, by the impugned order the Sub-Divisional Magistrate had directed the Anchal Adhikari for measurement of the land in dispute. Mr. Verma, appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that such an order is not contemplated under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and after the learned Magistrate had directed for dropping of the proceeding, it ought not to have made direction for measurement of land. In my opinion, the order under challenge can be corrected in an appropriate proceeding under the Code of Criminal Procedure itself. 2 It is well settled that remedy of a writ petition is a remedy of last resort and the Court interferes with the same only when no other remedy is available. In that view of the matter, I am of the opinion that the order impugned is not fit to be interfered in this writ application. Petitioner, if so advised, may take recourse to any other remedy available to him in law. Application stands dismissed with the observation aforesaid. Narendra/ (Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, ACJ.)