IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10576 of 2010 UMESH NARAYAN PANDEY SON OF LATE GANESH NARAYAN PANDEY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DEWARIA RAMPUR, P.O. & P.S. KUTUMBA, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR (SECONDARY EDUCATION) HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DIRECTOR, PROVIDENT FUND DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, MAGADH DIVISION, GAYA 6. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MAGADH DIVISON, GAYA 7. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GAYA 8. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, GAYA 9. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, AURANGABAD 10. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, GAYA 11. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, AURANGABAD 12. THE TREASURY OFFICER, GAYA 13. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR ----------- 2 09.07.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 28th February, 2007 as Headmaster, High School, Khurar, Gaya, the entire G.P.F. has not been paid as the G.P.F. for the period 1985-86 to October, 1995 has not been paid. Besides the claim for payment of the balance G.P.F. amount, the further claim of the petitioner is that ten thousand rupees was not paid along with the gratuity which would be appearing on perusal of the gratuity payment order issued by the Accountant General as contained in Annexure-4 on the ground that the A.G. office was not provided the last pay drawn certificate as also the no dues certificate from the P.W.D. with regard to occupation of official accommodation. Learned counsels appearing for the respondent-State - 2 - as also the Accountant General submit that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the claims with regard to payment of balance provident fund dues, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.10 with copy to the respondent nos. 8 & 11 and with regard to the claim for payment of balance amount of gratuity petitioner proposes to file a separate representation before the respondent no. 13. In such view of the matter, in case such representations stating details of unpaid claims are filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the respective representations shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representations so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable may also be paid to the petitioner along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)