IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS THURSDAY, THE 12TH AUGUST 2010 / 21ST SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 30925 of 2009(I) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): --------------------- 1. VINCENT, RENNI HOUSE, ARUMANNURKADA, POOVAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. LOBY DASAN, ANAND BHAVAN, MURACHALVILAKAM,THIRUPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.M.PREM SMT.K.P.SANTHI SRI.P.K.NIJOY SMT.NISHA G.THARAMAL RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SURVEY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLCIE, NEYYATTINKARA. 3. VASUDEVAN NAIR, VADAKKUBHAGAM VEEDU, THIRUPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 4. PARITHOSH @ UNNI, S/O. BHASKARAN NADAR, B.S.PURAM, THIRUPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS. ADV. SRI.P.R.VENKETESH FOR R3-4 SMT.M.A.ZOHRA(MEDIATOR) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.30925 OF 2009-I PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1.TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29.4.2008 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P2. TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 28.5.2008 SUBMITTED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 23.5.2008 OF THE RDO, TRIVANDRUM. EXT.P4. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 13.8.2009 OF THE RDO, TRIVANDRUM. EXT.P5. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 21.8.2009 IN IA NO.4382 OF 2009 IN O.S. NO.629 OF 2009 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, NEYYATTINKARA. EXT.P6. TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT CMP NO. 8326 OF 2009 FILED BY 2ND PETITIONER. K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.30925 of 2009-I ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 12th day of August, 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioners seek police protection. 2. We heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the party respondents and also the learned Government Pleader. 3. Petitioners have filed a civil suit and obtained Ext.P5 interim order. They apprehend danger to their life. Learned counsel for the party respondents submits that the party respondents have no intention to cause any threat to the life of the petitioners. We record the same. Relegating the petitioners to seek appropriate relief, the writ petition is disposed of. We, however, make it clear that in case petitioners complain of commission of any cognizable offence by the party respondents before the 2nd respondent, the 2nd respondent shall take action in accordance with law. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS