1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. SECOND APPEAL No. 236 OF 2010 Mahadevi Mahaling Pachakshari .. APPELLANT VERSUS Balasaheb Shrihari Jadhav .. RESPONDENT ... Shri Vitek Bhavtankar, Advocate for appellant Shri N.L. Jadhav, Advocate for respondent CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 23rd SEPTEMBER, 2010. PER COURT: The present appeal is filed by the Original defendant. The suit filed by the plaintiff for injunction was dismissed. The Plaintiff preferred an appeal. The District Judge-1, At Ambajogai, Dist. Beed, allowed the appeal restraining the defendant from interfering and obstructing in the possession of the plaintiff over the suit land. 2- Shri Bhavtankar,learned Counsel for the 2 appellant submitted that the Trial Court has rightly decreed the suit. The Appellate Court, without coming to the close quarters of the reasonings given by the Trial Court, reversed the finding of fact, which is erroneous. 3. It has come on record that the land, which was owned by the present appellant, was acquired, remaining 73 Are land is held by the plaintiff. In such circumstances, no error can be found in the Judgment of the Lower Appellate Court. 4. In the light of the above, no substantial question of law is involved in the Second Appeal, as such Second Appeal is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. [S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J] SDM* 236.10 SA