CWP No.2439 of 2009. 17.7.2009. Present: M/s Arun Bansal and Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocates, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma and Mr. Anil Jaswal, Dy. Advocate Generals, for the respondents. The respondent-State has invited sealed tenders vide Tender Notice vide Annexure P-1. The last date for submission of the tenders was 29th June, 2009 upto 4.00 p.m. The petitioner has submitted the tender on 29th June, 2009. However, vide Annexure P-2 issued by the Principal i.e. respondent No.2, the process was stopped. Mr. Arun Bansal has strenuously argued that the notice dated 30th June, 2009 is actuated with legal and factual malafides. The petitioner has not substantiated his submissions. The persons, according to him, who might be instrumental in stopping the process have not been named. It is easier to allege malafide than to establish. It was not necessary at this stage for the respondents to assign any reason before cancelling the process on 30th June, 2009. The petitioner has not made any representation before approaching this Court to the respondents. In this manner, the petition is pre-mature as well. The petitioner has failed to substantiate the violation of his legal right. The writ petition is dismissed. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. 17th July, 2009. (Rajiv Sharma), J. (tr)