[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL W.P.NO.2421 OF 2008 Nitin Sudam Kude ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Sandeep J.Ghogare advocate for Petitioner Mr.Y.M.Nakhwa A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : DECEMBER 2, 2008 DATE : DECEMBER 2, 2008 DATE : DECEMBER 2, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner is challenging the show cause notice issued by the learned Special Executive Magistrate against him in Chapter Proceedings No.10 of 2008 which relates to Case No.27 of 2008. Only show cause notice is issued against the applicant, hence, it would be open to the petitioner to reply to the said show cause notice. It would also be open to him to examine witnesses or produce any documents. After considering the same, if the learned Special Executive Magistrate is of the [-2-] opinion that it is necessary to call upon the petitioner to furnish interim bond or final bond, then in that event, four days time be given to the petitioner to comply with the terms of the bond. 3. Petition is disposed of with above directions. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]