THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED SECOND APPEAL NO.1440 OF 2011 JUDGMENT: The appellant ﬁled this appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 {“CPC” for brevity}, inter alia, seeking to assail the correctness of the judgment dated 17.10.2011 in A.S.No.104 of 2008 on the ﬁle of the I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, ﬁled Order XLI Rule 1 CPC, in conﬁrming the judgment dated 05.06.2008 in O.S.No.151 of 2006 on the ﬁle of the III Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, whereby the suit ﬁled under Section 26 Order VII Rule 1 CPC seeking recovery of vacant possession of the suit schedule shop by evicting defendant No.1 and for recovery of Rs.93,372/- @ Rs.1,506/- per month from October 2000 to November 2005, was decreed. The plaintiﬀs ﬁled O.S.No.151 of 2006 for recovery of possession and an amount of Rs.93,372/- @ Rs.1,506/- per month from October 2000 to November 2005. The suit was decreed and mesne proﬁts were also granted. Aggrieved by the same, the defendant No.1 therein ﬁled A.S.No.104 of 2008. The lower appellate Court dismissed the said appeal and conﬁrmed the judgment of the trial Court and directed the defendant No.1 to vacate the suit schedule property and hand over the possession of the same to the ﬁrst plaintiﬀ within two months from the date of that order. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal is filed. In view of the concurrent ﬁndings of both the Courts below and as there are no valid grounds to interfere with the judgments of both the Courts below, no substantial question of law arises and accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed with a direction to the ﬁrst defendant to deliver the possession of the suit schedule property to the ﬁrst plaintiﬀ within a period of three {3} months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. _____________________ (GHULAM MOHAMMED, J) 25th November 2011 RRB