IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5662 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 21.10.2009 Mukesh Kumar .....Petitioner versus Suresh Kumar .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.S.P.Chahar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate, for the respondent. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 6.8.2009 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Panipat, whereby the petitioner-plaintiff's evidence has been closed. It is urged on behalf of the petitioner that given one opportunity to the petitioner, he shall adduce his remaining entire evidence at his own responsibility. In view of the aforestated stand taken on behalf of the petitioner and in the interest of justice, this revision petition is allowed to the extent that the impugned order dated 6.8.2009 is set-aside and the trial C.R. No.5662 of 2009 (O&M) 2 Court is directed to give one more opportunity to the plaintiff-petitioner to adduce his entire evidence at his own responsibility and subject to payment of costs of Rs.2000/- to the respondent-defendant. Dasti. 21-10-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE