IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25234 of 2010 AMAN KUMAR KUSHWAHA SON OF CHHATHU BHAGAT, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE TIKARI, P.S. HUSSAINGANJ, DISTRICT- SIWAN – PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR—OPP. PARTY. ----------- 2/ 05-08-2010 Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution registered under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code in which subsequently offence under section 411 of the Indian Penal Code was also added, the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. as an accused. It is submitted that petitioner has been falsely implicated at the instance of his co-villager, Suraj Sah, who was on inimical term with the petitioner. From perusal of F.I.R., vide Annexure-1, it appears that it was a case of highway robbery. The petitioner was remanded in this case on 08.03.2010. Subsequently on 07.04.2010 he was put on T.I.Parade and was identified by the informant and his mother. In the aforesaid background, this Court is not inclined to accede to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail. The prayer for bail is rejected for the present. BTiwary/ (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)