1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. M - 233 OF 2005 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 138 OF 2004 Sheela Atul Vyas. ... ... Applicant. Versus Atul Prabhulal Vyas. ... ... Respondent. Ms. Jyoti Karanth i/by Mr. B. P. Jakhade for the Applicant. None present for the Respondent. CORAM : A. M. KHANWILKAR and A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 9TH JUNE, 2010. P. C.: As per office noting, notice sent to the appellant for making necessary arrangement to espouse her cause in the pending appeal, as the advocate on record has withdrawn his appearance, that notice has been returned with the remark “Refused to accept”. Since refusal to accept the notice will have to be treated as good service, we will proceed on the assumption that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present remedy. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. 2. In view of this order, companies civil application being Civil Application Nos. 138 of 2004 and 137 of 2004 also stand disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (A. A. SAYED, J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.)