-78 ^3xBT -yioirt^, u'-alt-i'is, Rrti<«y<( TiTOT^mq? ..^op^..vS.M.^....... ^200& 31T^9T (Rcl? (ijcl(jd^) an^sicpTf^qftR aanan^STsPTicp ?^ITSR;afeT3T[^?1 tpl<l[«<I1llllclT^'fs'cl •((ultci't ^ aiRl*i SII^ST PETITIONER Virenc|ra Kumar Sao, S/o Late Shri Nityanand Sao, ^ged about 19 years, R/o Gram & Post Tamn^r, Distt. Raigarh, Raigarh (CG) Vers RESPONDENTS 1. The S Tribai <£. State Triba!| Bhop^ Raiga 5. Union lis fate of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, • (CG) of Madhya Pradesh, Through Secretary Weifare Department, Vailabh Bhawan (M.P.) 3. Collec|tor, Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) 4. Deput^ Director, Tribal Welfare Department, -h, (CG) of India, Through Director, Personne! trainin^, Public grievances & Pension (State Reorgjanisatoin Celt) Loknayak Bhawan, Khan MarksTi, New Delhi. (Writ Petition under Articl •B: HQN. SHRlDHIE?ENDRjB ^226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) MISHRA.J Shri Sanjay Patel, coun^el for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt; A]dvocate for the State/respondents No.1, 3 and4. Shri Ajay Barik, Advoc^te, appears on behaif of Shri S.K. Beriwal, Standing Counset for Union o1[ India/respondent No.5. Heard. ^^ ^, ''^&^5'^'"^' i *!is^°"2 a^yl'~ -78 ^EEf "yi^irt^, tOTll'd^lco, RrtKiy *i 1*101 a»TT^ an^?T;RTR-ii* craT3IT^9Ttb*ll* 3TT^9I q^p (ljc|ijc|^i) ^200 mpassfonate coihtro By this petition, the respondents to give cor regular post. The grievance of the p{ was working as Lower Dlvisioiti District Ralgarh under the 1992. The petitioner mov^ appolntment but that has not t}' Learned counsei for the| submitted any application for the family members of the before the respondent authof years whereas this petition h| petitjon deserves to be dssmis^ It is settled law that descent. Appointment on c| favour of the chlldren or otherl rendering service. Appolf for meeting the immediate reason of the death of the on compassionate ground, it ^ it seeks to achieve, the 1| compassion. *l'i|(ri41-1 >11>1d)'f|'l5t3 •<|u|'«l'< ^i sif^q an^ST petitioner is seeking direction to the appointment to the petitioner in the ^titioner is that the father of the petitioner Teacher, Block Education Office Tamnar, ^ of the respondents. He died on 4-2- f^d an application for compassionate (een considered by the authorlties. State submitted that the petitioner has not jippointment on compassionate ground, but Ipetitioner have submitted their affidavits in the year 2005 i.e. after about 13 ^s been fiied in the year 2006, hence the s^ed on the ground of delay. |3ublic employment cannot be given on jsmpassionate ground is an exception in |relatives of the employees, who died whiie on compassionate ground is given only hjardship which is faced by the famiiy by earner. When an appointment is made ^hould be kept confined only to the purpose |Jea being not to provide for endless brtad 1 A ^ ^ sSpnf Bjqsiy\[ Mpusjnqa -/PS Aue jnoytWi Suisq uoi^^ed sy? 'AjBuipjoo^v ueo jeuositsd su} o) ^ueutuiodde 9}euoj 'pjeBsj siyi ui /»e|^o ssidiouyd pejuas eL|| p9UJB8| Aq paouBApe s^ueLunSje eyt 6t aijt us psiy ueaq sey uoitsisd }uejsui eq} s|e9 jsuoitjtsd ay} p jeyie^ ieq} 9)ndsip ui tou layif itU-jic <^ l.ia.t.lnj)- [^&J (iJWhlh [-[bWJh.ltto •j>9SS|tusip Aqsjaq ss soueisqns •ynoo ®!4iAq psnssi sq jSS^dlUOO j0 }UBj6 JO^ UO!P9J|P ou OSJB se 3}B4S sqi jo^ ISSUROO luepisuoo snqi 'gooz JesA s|e9J8UM 3661. -IB3A sq) ui peip 31 (I '9S80 ?UB}SUI 341 U| u^uepyH.MSiKka •m SAJEg ^ <blktBli;^IK>ltzU lb[>-BJI<bl,!glB. G^ (S>l3pjbti)tbl:h 1»^IK> OOZl-i^ ................................... CfeUttg IWklh >.¥i».IWQ'?>l^^!>|P.(n 'frWIMh^laaF' ,,6SSS'*a:iS?, ^'.A. ~^%. ^^:!ss^ '"%. sz-oir-ii \ "'^•aii..