IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 15TH OCTOBER 2009 / 23RD ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 29079 of 2009(D) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- ODAKKAL ABDUL MAJEED @ BAVA MUSSALIAR, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.MOOSAN KUTTY MUSALIAR, ODACKAL HOUSE, IRINJALLOOR, THIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM. BY ADVS.MR.A.T.ANILKUMAR SMT.V.SHYLAJA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, MALAPPURAM. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PARAPPUR VILLAGE, MALAPPURAM. 4. KUNJAMMUTTY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, AHAMMED, PULAKKUNDAN, IRINJALLOOR, MALAPPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss P.N.RAVINDRAN,J. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 29079 of 2009 - D ---------------------------------------- Dated 15th October, 2009 Judgment The prayer in this writ petition is for a direction to the District Collector, Malappuram and the District Registrar, Malappuram to consider Exts.P5 and P6 representations filed by the petitioner and to cancel the documents of title standing in the name of the fourth respondent. The petitioner contends that the fourth respondent has created false documents in respect of the properties described in Exts.P1 and P2 and therefore, the said documents are liable to be cancelled. In my opinion, respondents 1 and 2 cannot grant the reliefs prayed for by the petitioner in Exts.P5 and P6 representations. The reliefs sought in Exts.P5 and P6 representations can be granted only by a civil court. In such circumstances, I find no grounds to entertain this writ petition. The writ petition fails and it is accordingly dismissed, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to move the competent civil court seeking redressal of his grievances. P.N.RAVINDRAN Judge vaa