1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION W. NO.2372/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1818/2001 (Decided) Smt. Urmila Murlidhar Petkule ...Versus... State of Maharashtra and others ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri Shriniwas Deshpande, Adv. for applicant/petitioner] [Shri A.S. Sonare, AGP for respondents] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 06.11.2009 Learned Counsel for applicant/petitioner submits that during the pendency of present petition in the year 2005 the kerosene licence was renewed. He states that the said renewal was not at the instance of this Court or by any order made by this Court in the present petition. The cause of action in the present petition is related to the year 2001 and it has nothing to do with the further renewal, which is said to have taken place. According to learned Counsel for the applicant/petitioner, therefore, this application does not survive. The same is, therefore, disposed of with liberty to the applicant/petitioner to take such action as is permissible in law in case of such eventuality. JUDGE ssw