IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6993 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 08, 2010 Darbara Singh and another. …Petitioners Versus Harchand Singh and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. G.S. Nagra, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Naresh Gopal Sharma, Advocate, for the caveator-respondents. **** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the orders dated 24.09.2009 and 12.08.2010 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Khanna and learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana, respectively, whereby application moved by the plaintiffs-petitioners seeking ad-interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C., was rejected. C.R. No.6993 of 2010 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties fairly stated that present petition be disposed of with their consent in the following terms:- 1) Parties shall maintain status quo qua the possession and nature of the suit property; 2) None of the parties shall seek unnecessary adjournment before the learned Trial Court; 3) The learned Trial Court shall decide the suit itself at its own merit, within one year from the date certified copy of this order is produced before it, without being prejudice from any observation made in the impugned orders. Present petition is disposed of in the above said terms with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. November 08, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2