IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1686 of 2011 VINOD YADAV & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 14.02.2011 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304B, 498A, 201 and120B of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is alleged against the petitioners to have administered poison to the victim. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that victim under mistaken identity consumed the pesticide. The impugned order reflects that post mortem report does not reflect the specific cause of death. Annexure 2 has been brought on record to suggest that Faradebyan was recorded on the basis of the statement of the husband of deceased which led to registration of U.D. Case No. 1 of 2009 and after 9 days of the occurrence the present case was lodged with frivolous allegation. Considering the fact that there is no 2 explanation for the delay in lodging the F.I.R. and the fact that U.D. case was registered on which the informant’s sides also made a signature and post mortem report does not reflect any resisting injuries, let the petitioner, namely, 1.Vinod Yadav, 2. Mani Yadav, 3. Dipni Devi, 4. Mithilesh Yadav and 5. Kumar Yadav, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 185 of 2009. Bhardwaj ( Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)