IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5207 of 2008 Date of Decision : 26.9.2008. Ramphal & another ...... Petitioners Versus Smt. Jaspal Kaur ......Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Umesh Narang, Advocate, for the petitioner. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) Challenge herein is to the order dated August 6, 2008 passed by Rent Controller, Chandigarh, whereby, provisional rate of rent, interest and costs of the demised premises were assessed. The assessment was provisional only. If on the final adjudication by the Controller, the actual is found at variance with the provisional assessment, two consequences will entail. If the amount deposited by the tenant is found to be in excess, the Controller may direct a refund but, if, on the other hand, the amount deposited by the tenant is found to be short or deficient, the Controller may pass a conditional order directing the tenant to place the landlord in possession of the premises by giving a reasonable time to the tenant unless the tenant makes good the deficiency by depositing the balance amount within the period to be fixed by the Rent Controller. The petition is devoid of merit and is dismissed. 26.9.2008. (NAWAB SINGH) SN JUDGE