IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 31ST MAY 2010 / 10TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 16529 of 2010(M) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ LEKHA B.T., THOZHARATHU PARAMBIL HOUSE, AYMANOM P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN, SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR, SRI.K.JAGADEESH. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KOTTAYAM. 2. KANAKKARY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.3831, KANAKKARY, VEMPALLY P.O., PIN - 686 633, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. R1 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------------ W.P(C) NO: 16529 OF 2010 M ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st May, 2010. JUDGMENT The petitioner is a candidate whose name has been included in the rank list for appointment to the post of junior clerks. Appointments to the posts of junior clerks are to be made from the list submitted by the Co-operative Service Examination Board, after complying with the conditions stipulated in Rule 182(4) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules. Therefore, the petitioner should have been appointed to one of the posts that has fallen vacant subsequent to the publication of the list. The complaint of the petitioner is that the second respondent society instead of appointing persons from the list have been filling up the said vacancies by promoting persons from the posts of peons/attenders. The above procedure would only result in denial of appointment to the petitioner that is legitimately due to her. Though the petitioner has submitted Ext.P1 representation before the first respondent, no orders have been passed thereon till date. The petitioner therefore seeks appropriate directions for an early disposal of Ext.P1. The learned senior Govt. Pleader has no objection to such a direction being issued. WPC 16529/2010 2 2. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner evidenced herein by Ext.P1 in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders thereon as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. K. SURENDRA MOHAN Judge jj WPC 16529/2010 3