IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M.No.14734-CI of 2011 in/and RFA No.4090 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:12.10.2011 Kishan Kumar ....Appellant Versus State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: None for the appellant. Mr. H.S.Lalli, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. * * * RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL) The landowner has filed the instant appeal challenging the impugned award of the Reference Court claiming further enhancement of compensation on the ground that the same was inadequate. This appeal was admitted for hearing vide order dated 08.12.2010. Civil miscellaneous application No.14734-CI of 2011 has been filed by the counsel for the appellant praying that this appeal be disposed of in terms of order dated 04.04.2011 passed in RFA No.254 of 2008 titled as Parveen Kumari Vs. State of Haryana and others being covered by the aforesaid judgment. Vide order dated 03.10.2011, notice of this application was given to the counsel opposite. Sh. H.S.Lalli, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, has very fairly stated that the prayer made in this application is correct. Keeping in view the stand taken by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of State of Haryana, prayer made in this C.M.No.14734-CI of 2011 in/and -2- RFA No.4090 of 2010 (O&M) application is allowed and the main appeal is taken on board and is disposed of in terms of aforesaid judgment dated 04.04.2011 passed in RFA No.254 of 2008 (supra). October 12, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) savita JUDGE