C. R. No.4744 of 2011 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C. R. No.4744 of 2011 (O & M) Date of decision: 19.10.2011 Balwant Singh .... Petitioner Versus Ajit Singh ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. C.S. Pasricha, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Aman Bahri, Advocate, for the respondent. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.: (Oral) The defendant-petitioner by way of present revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has prayed for setting aside the order dated 15th June, 2011 passed by the trial Court whereby the application filed by the petitioner-defendant under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been dismissed. 2. Upon notice having been issued to the respondent, Mr. Aman Bahri, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent and produced a photocopy of the order passed by the trial Court on 06.08.2011. Same is taken on record. C. R. No.4744 of 2011 (O & M) ::2:: 3. Learned counsel has pointed out that the respondent- plaintiff has already made a statement on 03.08.2011 to withdraw the suit but the same stands adjourned in view of the interim order passed on 05.08.2011. The next date of hearing fixed in the case before the trial Court is 07.11.2011. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner-defendant states that the respondent-plaintiff may be allowed to withdraw the suit. However, it may be directed that the observations made in the impugned order dated 15.06.2011 shall not be binding in case of any future litigation. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent-plaintiff states that since he is withdrawing the suit, therefore, any observation made by the trial court shall not be taken to be binding in case any future dispute arises between the parties. 6. In view of the above, the revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 7. However, anything observed by the trial Court in the order dated 15th June, 2011 shall not be binding on the parties in future litigation in view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the parties. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE October 19, 2011 sukhpreet