IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18657 of 2008 SHANTI KUNWAR W/O Late Bhagwan Singh, resident of Village-Odar, P.S. Sonhan Kala, District Kaimur (Bhabua)at present at Mohalla Bhabua, Ward No.23, P.O. & P.S.-Bhabua, District Kaimur. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Registrar-cum-Secretary, Co- operative Society, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Chairman, Sasaram Bhabua Central Co-operative Bank at Sasaram. 4. The Managing Director, Sasaram-Bhabua Central Co-operative Bank at Sasaram. 5. The District Co-operative Officer, Sasaram. 6. The Branch Manager, Bhagwanpur Branch, Sasaram-Bhabua Central Co-operative Bank at Bhagwanpur. ---Respondents ----------- 8. 10.12.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-Bank. A bank draft, bearing No.602666 dated 1.12.2009, drawn on Punjab National Bank for a sum of Rs.1,08,114/- as stated in paragraph 8 of the supplementary counter affidavit has been handed over by the learned counsel for the Bank to Mr Ravi Shankar Sahay, learned Counsel who appears on behalf of the petitioner, which is said to be the balance retiral dues, according to the Bank, payable to the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on perusal of the office orders, contained in Memo Nos.176 and 177 both dated 28th of June, 2008, as contained in Annexure H/4 and I/4 respectively to the supplementary counter affidavit, it appears that a sum of Rs.4,57,694/- has been deducted from the total retiral dues amounting to Rs.5,09,544/- payable to the petitioner. However, those 2 two office orders have not been communicated to the petitioner and as such, the respondent-Bank should communicate the same to the petitioner so as to enable the petitioner to assail the same in accordance with law, if so advised. Learned counsel for the Bank submits that the amount of deduction to the tune of Rs.18,905/- as mentioned in the office order contained in Memo no.177 dated 28th June, 2008 (Annexure I/4) has been refunded back to the petitioner, which fact has been stated in paragraph 5 of the supplementary counter affidavit. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)