IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH t. \ WRIT PETITION N0. '2-P,^ / 2006 PETITIONER: ,c...--^^ \o>ft..<^"' ^y^ ?^fc"1.-'"" .,..-::"<^..---" .^^2^b^" ^"•^•;-" Smt. Radha Nayak, W/o Arun Nayak ^ aged about 27 years, R/o Village Madhopali, Tahsil Saraipali, Distt- Mahasamund (C.G.) ^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhatisgarh Through the Secretary, ^ Department of Panchayat & Rural s DKS Bhawan, Raipur. 2. Theeollector ^/ DistrictRaipur (C.G.) 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Director Panchayat & Gramin Vikash Vibhag Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 5. Smt. Santosh Sen w/o Miu-lidhar Sen <•'• Ekta nagar, sectar-3 ,G/3, Gudhiyari Raipur, (C.G.) L,..; •^'ssssessS-'' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 2267 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INDIA •sn^frwft-iN; OTT 311^1 aitfiti *<l*K'irs»lH|ch ta-..:^.p..2d^l6.^^200 Sii^i'i ia<»>(ll,c<i^lsl<{W) W(RKflf^(T3I1^?T 16.S.SOQS HearQ Shri Ssnjay K Ag^ Shri A^hutosh Singh Kej> ! ne main gnevance raf appited for the post of Shlkst) Disfrict and as per ruies, examinatlon or having degre^ itchwaha, Govt. Advocate for the State. jsed fcy the peiitioner in this petition is that he Karmi Grade-ii in OBC category for Raipur he candidates who have passad the B.Ed. of S-hiksha Visharad id'Afi-^fc enfltled for the <^f taif^hf tvs?3rk?i Tha 's/*s?' ''*• '' >'*A1 l'l'w ' * 11-»/ Vishsrad. but the respondeny him, wnereas the same benefl & ivianasamund districts, Snert theConstitution ofinaia. Learned counsel for trt sor h?*% rrt<5ri<a -q ranrac^ ^•WW, *•»•• , .»••«•t • 1-WWV ••» I •<']-•* •—•»-^ the same has noi vet besn d< to decid®the representation wnicn learned counsel ?or tne ; Maving neard iearnecs fscts and circumstances of tM TH& pfii;TiQner appesrs To ne ji No.4 is directsd to dscide th^ of 30 dsy^ ffom todsy In scci| aii tne point-s raised by the petj with the direction afore] Certified copy as per ru| <fii<itCT41-f ><i*inl'fffe'<fl <R|«|< ^3Tl^lT3t1^T irwai, Advocate for ih®petstsonsr. |\@ti^t^n^r tc ^syli^C! th^ d^QfQ^ Of ShikshS havs not given the benefit of eiaht marks to |t has been given to the candidates of Raigarh ifore, this is tne clear yioiation of Articie 14 of s petitioner submitted that in this respect ths irstatlo" (Annsxurs p-S),to rsspQndsnt No.4 but scided, therefore, rsspondsnt No.4 bs directed ^nd pasg appropriate orders in the matter, to itate has no objection. cjounsel for the partles ana having rsgara to the case, the prayer made by iearned counsei for j^jst, fair and reasonabte, thsfefore, respQndent repressniation of ths petiiion&r wlthin a psriod 'rdsnos with law sftsf t3k»n9 into coriSi^^i'Suvn tioner. aaid, the petition sSands disposed of. -£''*.—.-.-... • •' es. .-' Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge /•---^ <M l^