ssp 1 WP 1330 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1330 OF 2011 Vinod Gupta .....Petitioner versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ..... Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION 1369 OF 2011 Ramanji s/o Devkinand Jindhal .....Petitioner versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ..... Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION 1418 OF 2011 Manoj P. Kedia .....Petitioner versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ..... Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION (L) 1672 OF 2011 Ram Avtar Gadodia .....Petitioner versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ..... Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION (L) 1711 OF 2011 Satish Goyal .....Petitioner versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ..... Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION (L) 1761 OF 2011 Kiran Tulsyan .....Petitioner versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ..... Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION (L) 1760 OF 2011 ssp 2 WP 1330 of 2011 Amit Gupta .....Petitioner versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ..... Respondent Mr.A.M.Saraogi, for the petitioners. Ms.P.A.Purandare, for the respondent. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATE: 30 th AUGUST, 2011 P.C. 1. Mentioned. Not on board. Taken on board at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. In all the above petitions, petitioners have challenged the notice under Section 53(1) of the M.R.T.P.Act, issued by the respondent- Corporation. Learned counsel for the respondent-Corporation states that petitioners will be given hearing and appropriate orders will be passed in accordance with law. For this purpose, petitioners may initially remain present before the concerned Officer on 07-09-2011 at 11.00 a.m. and the concerned officer may thereafter, hear the petitioners and may pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. 3. Learned counsel for the Corporation submits that in so far as Writ Petition (L) No.1760 of 2011 is concerned, part demolition has been carried out. The said statement is recorded. 4. Till the appropriate decision is taken, the existing status ssp 3 WP 1330 of 2011 quo is directed to be maintained by both the parties, qua rest of the constructions. 5. If any regularization application is made, it is for the concerned authority to decide the same in accordance with law. Subject to what is stated above, the above writ petitions are accordingly disposed of. ( R.M.SAVANT, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )