IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 260 of 2008 Brij Lal and another …… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ……….. Respondents ………… Mr. N.C. Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S.Sandhu, Government Advocate for the State. ………… Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C.J. After hearing the arguments of Mr. Nanak Chand Gupta, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. G. S. Sandhu, the learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 and 2, I am convinced that the documents annexed with the petition, prima facie, do reveal that the offences have been committed. 2. No interference by this Court is called for while exercising jurisdiction U/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 3. The petition is dismissed in limine. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 25.04.2008 A