IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.692 of 2011 Decided on: Feb.24, 2011. Birbal Kumar ………..Petitioner versus State of H.P. and others ……….Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr.J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved since he has been replaced by the third respondent. The petitioner is a PTA appointee and the third respondent is a regular appointee. The third respondent has been working on regular basis at Government Senior Secondary School, Nabahi. According to the petitioner, he can work only in Government Senior Secondary School, Nabahi, whereas the third respondent, being a regular teacher, can work in any open vacancy. But the fact remains that the third respondent has been continuing for about one year as a regular teacher. In case the petitioner can point out any suitable vacancy where the third respondent is willing to be accommodated on his own, the petitioner may point out the same before the second respondent 2 along with the record regarding the willingness of the third respondent, in which case the second respondent will consider the matter and take appropriate action within another one month. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice Feb.24, 2011 (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tilak/cs) Judge.