HieiiLCOURr.QF CHHA'PnSGARH AT BELASPUR WJ».(8|MO. 2'Ki2008 PETITIONBR 7 Versus RESPONDEKTS 5. Premlal Mirchanya, S/o. Shii Punitram Mirchaaya, aged about S3 years, Assistaat Teachcr, Govenunent Pmnary School Sitamaiu, Korba, Block Korba, District Korba (CG) State of Chliattisgarli, Throi^h Secretaiy, Scfaool Education Deparfment, DKS Bhawaa, Raipur The Director, PubUc Instruction DepartDient Raipur (CG) District Educatipn Qfficer, Korba Block Education Officer, Korba, DtetrictKorba, (CG) Joiat Director, Treasuiy, Bilaspttr WRITPBTITION UNDBRARTICLE 236 OFTHE COMSTITOT'ION OPIWDIA (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. AaBUioti-i. J.I ~ Shri K.S.Pawar, ctxmsel ftu- thc pettfiDiier. Shii Arviad Dubey, Paael Lsiwyer fpr the State. ' ORALORDBR (Passed oa this 4th day of«Xanua»y2008) The petitioner was appomted oa 15.07.1976 as Assistant A Teacher on a fixed pay scale ofRs. 150/-. Afterconipletion of fhe probation, he was granted regular pay scalc. 2. Leacaed counsel appearingforfhc petitunersubmitsthat fhe issue iuvolved in fhe case is^ ^^to whether, the petitioaer is entitled to regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of itutial appomtment or after coiapletion ofprobationpenod. Sugzina J^: 3. The issue involved, hereia was considered by the Madliya Pradesh State AdmiEustrative Tribuiial, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (MadhUkaiitYadu aad 36 others Vs. State ofM.P. and Others) whereiaitwas heldthatfhe siuularly situated teachers are entifled to regular pay scate w.e:f. the date of initial appoiatment The aiatterwas takea up to the Hon'ble Supreme Courfc The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'ble Suprenie Court uphpldiug the decision of the Tribunal to the efiect that the Teachers/Assistaat Teachers are entitled to regutor pay scale fioia date of nntial appoiatment 4. Leamed counsel appeanng fbr fhe petitioafir furtfaer submits tfaat fhis Court, wliile conslderiag the same issue In Paras Nafh Gupta Vs, State of Chhatysgarh & Ofhera (W.P.(S) No.58af2007) by order dated 15.01.2007, has granted regular pay scate w.e.f. the date ofuutial appointoient. 5. Leamed cpunsel appeariag for the partfes jototfy subimt that this case is squarely covered by fhe decisioa of this Court in the case of Paras Nath Gupte Vs. State of CtAattisgarh & Ofhers (Supr^. 6. In view of that fhis petition 1s allowed ia the same terms. N6 orderas to costs. / ~- \ y Satish K. Agnihotri Judge '^ /