RSA No. 649 of 2006 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 649 of 2006 Date of Decision: July 10, 2009 Gurmeet Kaur ...... Appellant Versus Jaswant Singh and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. Maninder Arora, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This appeal has been filed by the appellant against the concurrent judgments of the Courts below decreeing the suit for recovery on the basis of the pronote. Learned counsel for the appellant has proposed the following substantial questions :- a) Whether any reliance can be placed on the testimony of witnesses on whose instances the pronote is fabricated and execution whereof has not been proved and neither the signatures of the deceased Mohinder Singh have been admitted. RSA No. 649 of 2006 2 b) Whether the Courts below can decree the suit of the plaintiff after the death of executor of pronote i.e. Mohinder Singh only on the basis of statement of PWs? It would be seen that both the questions are pure questions of fact. Learned counsel for the appellant has taken me through the findings and the evidence on record but I regret my inability to hold that either the findings are based on no evidence or that they are based on such a misreading of the evidence which would render them perverse. Consequently this appeal is dismissed. No costs. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE July 10, 2009 sunita RSA No. 649 of 2006 3