^..v.1oc; 18 2HE HIGH CCURT O? iTOEaCATCTKE AS BIIASPUR (OS) WRIT PE3TTIGN N0. 2t-i3 OF 2004 ^TWBBI Sayyed Akbar Q'0 sayyed Bazag , aged abou't-54 yaars. wrfclng as Hsad (teEdeE BistEie't .iail BDrba, resident of Jail aalcnay," R»eba» Sdisil aad Ois-kriGte »3rba (C3G). ^•••"\^•"' ^•^•y\ 'iETlTlCREE :••" <-'n^\ .^cy s^".^ .•••"i^ A N B MSS^K!/^^ .l»w' &'••• Ihe Sta-fce o£ ctoha'ttiserari'i;'^ _. ._,.,..,,.... '........: ^irpugh tfae SBcretary Beparttasnt of Hsme Affairs/oail ePd'TE'aBisportat.iOR,' I'Kin'tralay? B.'K.S. Building. reipur, sAsil aa.a Bi-sferict saipur (os). 2. 'ftieg»eGislseeretary,s,,,_.,,.. ...,,.,. dtha-ttd.sgarh ao'vemment ,' Home (i3ail) Bspar'tjBait, MantaalasS'. D. K. S, .Bisd.ldlnt.: .. Baipur..( 03) . ,.. ,.,..,. 32 •ihe'Mreetor Geaaeral o^-B»lice-& Kspector'oeneralof jails,1 Chhat.tisgaA, Ba.i.par, 'rAsil and Bistrict Eaipur. 4. flie sii^erin-tsndent of J&il, Blstrict Sail, Karba^ 'Eehsil and Blstrict R>rba (OG). 5. Ari. (aibuni Lal sahu, Head warder, Eested a-fc sub jail sulana (03). '^1 'M]/^^ EESPCNDENTS t;v WRII PE'CITIOT UNDER AR'SCLES 226/227 ©pIHE CWSTITIJSIEN e? •ssse.s XI-HC-22 ari^r^n R-li'* SD^I ^^ y^ •-. -..•-^"-^^s?-- y ^0 '3^'^IFIRPI, efll'M'16, [«IC1l'My SIT^T iraq? W.P. (?o«3013/2004 "^ *II*ICTI a>><i<»i 200 (clfc^tT' aii^i ^giw Tifkd 21-09-2004 On a mention beino made. the case i^ •-—o——-":? Sfari S.K. Chandcl, Counscl for ihc |^ctitioncr. Shri U.N.S. Deo, .Govt.Advocate for the State. Others}. He Blso siibmits that for fhe presen|t the petitioner may be @ven an opportumty of filing the detailed reprasentation before which shall be eonsidered on its own merits i|n accOTdmice with law. Havir®considered and'without expn in the opinion of this Court, ends ofjustice^ will be served if a direction is given to the petitioner to make a detailed representatian authority of the resporuients along with a cejpy of the petition and this order, withm 10 days, and on such representation beitlg filed) shall decide the same on its own merite irl <=bt^<41T1 ^H^lf^ ffi^l <ral<-di< '^'3lf;OT 311^1 taken iin Application for uigent hearing is all^wed Hcard. Lcamcd coimscl for Ihc pctitioncr sutnnits tfiat thc matter rclatcs to transfcr ofthc petitioner. He fi.trtfoer suhmits tfa&t under su^-rule 2 ofRule 208 oftiie Jail Msnual the petitioner could not be transferred. He alst) submits that fhe petitioner is a pstient of hypertension. Leained counsel for the petiti^ner relies on order dated 29-7-2004 passed in WP.No.828/2004 (Surendra Prasad Sharma Vs. The State of Chhattisearh & fae eompetent authority of the regpondents, ssjng any opinion on fhe merits ofthe case, raising his gdevaxices before fhfi competent the competent authority of the respondente accordance with law as early as possible preferably withm. six weefcs from the date cf receipt of the representation. Meanwhile, the petitioner, if already not relieved. mBy b4 allcwed to coiitmue in the present place of postmgtill consideration ofthe representatio?i. It is made clear that if any grievanc^ still remains, the petitioner may avail fhe remedyavailableunderthelaw. I With the aforesaid observations, this|petition stands disposed of. Consequently M.W.P.No.2631/2004| Certified copy as per mles. also stands disposed of. FaK^ru< I'qr®^'nss.