ff ^' i. .y/ II, m®HIGH COURT._0£_J]^mgMuEg_^J3ILS^^_JlL-l-I K.P. KO. i'2ifC) -/2001 PETITIOt-iER s-^Narrnada Pras.ad Sahu S/o Miganrain ta' Sahu aged 45 years, resident @f Village Basaha P.S. Srpat Distt Bilaspur, at present Naya Risda .Shadarapara Balco near house of Sarpanch, Balconagar Koxba (C.G.) Versus ESSEQBIEHTS ..^•^" ^^''t^.1^' Ai;^S\". ^^^y" »-^^v A.»".^' si^-l. Die6ctor General of Pslice Ghhatisgarh Rsipur, Chhatiso-arh 2. Inspeo-fcor General of Police Chhatisgarh Raipur» Chhatisgarh 3. Inspeotor General of Police C.I.D. Raipur* Chha-fcisgarh **• EETITION UI3HER ARTICLE 226/227 Oi-' THE CCaai-ITUTIOK OE- IHDIfi. BiIB J- XI-HC-22 SiI^CW . K,-u* sf^v ^^T^ ^l^fl: .•\-'^:^^SK^' ;i';l:l:itjSS?"- T^ -'<l'41d'4, yiily'ie, Iqcii+iy W.P. N0. 1840/01 tlllCTI y,^\^——•————•—••————^f 2CO 3:n^r ^giw ^ri%<t 23-4-2002 Petitioner bv Shri B State by Shri Sanj, jy K. Agrawal, Dy. Advocate General. The petitioner is unfortunate father whose daughter was niarried with Laxminara' anu Gauna cereinoiiy to Rati Sahu died in the hc deatfa was found to be p petitioner went to the Po direction to the respond^ <^f^^<ftTT "RTq^Tf ^ t^St' <E^n(^.l< ^; 3lP<H 3tli?t .N.Pandev, Advocate. \aii Sahu in the nionfh of April 1998 ^k place in June 1998. His daughter •spital on 7-7-2000 and the cause of oison. The poison was taken by the deceased at village Akalt^ri and tliereafter she was brought to Bilaspur hospital. It is s-s|ibmitted that the cause ofdealh was known after the Post Dliortera of the bodv was done. The ce Station froni time to time to lodge report but his case has 4ot been registered. In thls petition t|he petitioner has prayed for t.he its to register the case for the death P.T.0. [Tft^^firt ^- JQ-HC-22 'TST ';qpn?ra, »^y'i6,i»icii'Mli< •sn^rw frira'sn^i ^-.^t^ ^l^fl -"~iSs ?;'''^KMSJIK-!; •P. N0. 1840/01 •<i*<wTgi^(ra? sn^i'TOnw ^rfld of his daughter Rati Sahju who died due to poison against the accused persons and to on a decision of the ] °nt^I<n<4li •^iH<?ff "^ 'f^'^t 'tpij^K ^sipgitaii^i nvestigation the niatter and to take appropriate action. Leai|aed cotmsel for the petitioner relies 'ion'ble Apex Court in the case of Mohindro -v- State of PUnjab and ofhers reported in AIR 2001 s.r* °11 ? h-/1'^ -£• JL X =^. Haviiig considered case, Hiaterial on recor the facts and circuiustances of the d. it is directed that a case wUl be reglslered and enquir^r[wUl be made strictly in accordance with law as early as po^sible preferably withtn &%e months from today as niuch tin^e since 7-7-2002 has already lapsed. It is further directed a submitted to the C.J.M. hat after enquiiy a report shall be concen-ied and copy of the same shaU also be sent to the Regi^trar of this Court. With thes t, c. m>^ directlij)ns, the petition is disposed. •^- Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge r«^@4