{ 1 } S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.433/2007. (MOOLA RAM & ORS. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN) DATE OF ORDER : 16.01.2008. HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J. Mr. J.S. Chaudhary for the petitioners. Mr. Ashok Upadhayay, Public Prosecutor. Mr. H.S. Shrimali for the non-petitioners. By this petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. validity, correctness and propriety of the order dated 08.05.2007 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.1, Bikaner is assailed. By the order aforesaid, learned trial court while accepting an application preferred under Section 319 Cr.P.C., took the cognizance against the petitioners for the offence under Sections 498-A and 304-B IPC. The contention of counsel for the petitioners is that whatever stated by PW-2 Bhanwar Lal and PW-3 Purna Ram is not at all sufficient to take cognizance against the petitioners. I have perused the statements of PW-2 and PW-3 and am satisfied that adequate evidence is available, at least to take cognizance against the petitioners by accepting the application preferred under Section 319 Cr.P.C. As such, I do { 2 } not find any merit in this revision petition. However, looking to the age of the applicants and considering all other facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that if the petitioners appear before the trial court on or before 04.02.2008 and also prefer an application for bail, that may be considered on the same day by the trial court. With these directions, this revision petition is disposed of. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. Anil/