IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 6527 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: July 15, 2010 Kuldip Singh .........PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab and others ......RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA Present: Mr. R.P. Dhir, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. B.S. Chahal, DAG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed essentially in challenge to order Annexure P-1 dated 25.03.2009. Perusal of order Annexure P-1 indicates that the petitioner had been transferred for general duty in the office of Himan Rights Commission, Punjab, Chandigarh, from Barnala. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from Gurmail Singh, Assistant Civil Suit Clerk in the office of SSP Barnala, states that the petitioner had served in Human Rights Commission, Punjab, Chandigarh for 3-4 months. He was transferred back to Barnala and at this point in time, there is no proposal to transfer the petitioner in Human Rights Commission, Punjab, Chandigarh. 3. In view of the statement given on behalf of the State, cause of action does not survive. 4. The petition is accordingly disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 15.07.2010 (AJAI LAMBA) shivani JUDGE 1. To be referred to the reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?