..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.503 OF 2006 Shri.Siddhappa Parappa Bashetty. ..Petitioner. Versus M/s.National Drug Corporation and Anr. ..Respondents. .... None for the petitioner. Mr.B.M.Shaikh, Adv. for respondent No.1 - orig.Complainant. Mr.S.R.Shinde, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 20th October, 2008. DATED : 20th October, 2008. DATED : 20th October, 2008. P.C.: . None for the petitioner-orig.accused. Mr.Shaikh, Advocate present for respondent-orig.complainant. 2. By judgment and order dated 21st April, 2006 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 43rd Court, Borivali, Mumbai in C.C. No.3223/SS/2005 the petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Appeal preferred by the petitioner came to be dismissed. Hence he preferred the present revision application. ..(2).. 3. During pendency of the revision, the parties tendered consent terms. On account of the consent terms, by order dated 30th April, 2007, the petitioner came to be acquitted. As per the consent terms some amount was to the paid to the complainant. In the order dated 30th April, 2007, this Court made it clear that "if the amounts as stated in the consent terms are not paid on or before 26th August, 2007, this order shall stand vacated and the revision shall stand revived". Thereafter the complainant approached the Court and stated that the amounts were not paid as per the consent terms hence he preferred Criminal Application No.307 of 2007 for vacating the order dated 30th April, 2007 and for restoration of the revision. The said application came to be allowed by order dated 6th August, 2008. 4. The learned Advocate for the complainant states that till today the amount has not been given to the complainant. In view of this statement as a last chance the petitioner is granted time of one month to hand over the amount as mentioned in the consent terms to the complainant. If the amount is not paid within a period of one month from today, the revision ..(3).. shall automatically stand dismissed and the order of the trial Court and Sessions Court shall stand confirmed. In case the amounts are not paid within a period of one month from today, and as the order of conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act of the trial Court would be confirmed, it would also be open to the complainant to take out execution proceedings and/or take any other steps in accordance with law. 5. Criminal Revision Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)