IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 5TH DECEMBER 2006 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 Bail Appl..No. 7079 of 2006() ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN BA.5593/2006 Dated 17/10/2006 .................... PETITIONER -------------- SREELATHA, AGED 35 YEARS, D/O.LATE N.PADMANABHAN NIAR, NAMBRON HOUSE, ANNUR P.O., PUTHIYANKAVU ROAD, PAYYANNUR VIA., KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANNUR TOWN POLICE STATION, KANNUR. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. JAI GEORGE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * B.A. NO. 7079 of 2006 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated, this the 5th day of December 2006 ORDER Petitioner, a lady, who is the 2nd accused in Crime No. 365/06 of Kannur Town Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 468, 471, 472 read with Sec. 34 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. Petitioner had sought anticipatory bail from this Court on an earlier occasion by filing B.A. 5593/06 and as per Annexure 2 order dated 17-10-2006 this court was not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Such being the position, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. There is no reason why the petitioner should not seek regular bail from the Magistrate concerned. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the concerned Magistrate within two weeks from today and files and application for regular bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same day on which it is filed. With this observation, this application is disposed of. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani.