IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7558 of 2008 BISHUNDEO SAH @ BISHUNDEO PD.SAH --- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SUMITRA DEVI W/O LATE SHIV NARAYAN MAHTO --- OPP. PARTIES. For the Petitioner : Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Nirbhay Kumar Singh, APP ----------- 04 23.09.2010 Petitioner assails the institution of the F.I.R. on the ground that the allegations contained therein do not make out an offence. It is also contended that the present F.I.R. is counter blast. It is next submitted that even if the allegations contained in the F.I.R. is found to be correct, the case at best may be a civil dispute. Learned counsel for the opposite party submits that pursuant to the institution of the present F.I.R. investigation was carried out whereafter charge sheet has been submitted which gave rise to a judicial order. This Court does not find any merit in this application. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)