HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH.BILASPUR M.C.C. N0.359/2011 APPUCANTS 1. Mrs. Mutkuni Bai, W/o Late Chowki Lal Sahu, Aged about 65 years, 2. Ramkhilawan S/o Late Chowki Lal Sahu, Aged about 49 years, 3. Mrs. Neera Bai, D/o Late Chowki Lal Sahu, Aged about 45 years, 4. Mrs. Nirmala Bai, D/o Late Chowki Lal Sahu, Aged about 41 years, 5. Kamal Narayan S/o Late Chowki Lal Sahu, Aged about 38 years, 6. Ramesh Kumar, S/o Late Chowki Lal Sahu, Aged about 35 years, 7. Mrs. Rameshwari, D/o Late Chowki Lal Sahu, Aged about 30 years, All R/o Village Kasdol, Tahsil- Kasdol, Distt. Raipur (C.G.). 1. Chowki Lal Sahu (dead) S/o Pyare Lal Sahu, aged about 35 years, R/o Village Kasdot, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Vijay Lal, S/o Burga, aged about 55 years, R/o Village Kasdol, Distt. Raipur 2. State of M.P. (Now C.G.), through Collector, Raipur (C.G.). APPLICATION FOR RSTORATION OF M.C.C. P.R. N0.1314/20t1 APPELLANT/ DEFENDANTS RESPONDENTS Appearance: Mr. Sudhir Verma, Advocate for tiie petitioners. Mr. R.R. Sinha, Panel Lawyer for respondent No.2. SUNILKUMARSINHAJ. ORAL ORDER (04.07.2011) Heard. \ The petitioners are seeking restoration of M.C.C.(PR) No. 1314/2011, which was later on re-numbered as M.C.C. No. 331/2011, as the same was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 14.06.2011 because ttie ? lli^S^ 1.^ ....-..—.^ ^ '^. ^•^'^ M.C.C. N0. 359/2011 counsel for the petitioners did not appear on the said date whenthe matter was taken up for hearing. On due consideration ofthe submissionsmade bythe teamed Gounesel for the parties and the grounds taken in the restoration application, lam satisfied that the absence of learned counsel for the petitioners on 14.06.2011 when theabove M.C.C. was taken up for hearing was based on bonafide grounds. Accordingly, M.C.C. No. 359/2011 is allowed and M.C.C. (PR) No. 1314/2011 <re-numbered as M.C.C. No. 381/2011) is restored to its original number. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge