CR No. 1411 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.1411 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.03.2011. M/s Tachyon Medical System Pvt. Ltd. .......Petitioner Vs. M/s Verma Nursing Home & another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Raj Mohan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... SABINA, J. Plaintiff-petitioner has filed a suit for permanent injunction. An application was moved by the plaintiff for permission to lead secondary evidence. Vide impugned order dated 16.12.2010, the said application was dismissed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division). Hence, the present petition by the plaintiff-petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that now the petitioner has got certified copy of the agreement in question. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves dismissal. The trial court has dismissed the application, filed by the plaintiff for permission to lead secondary evidence, on the CR No. 1411 of 2011 (O&M) -2- ground that the secondary evidence could be allowed only when the original was destroyed or was not in the possession of the party who wanted to produce the same or it was in the possession of the adverse party who despite notice had refused to produce the same. Plaintiff had not taken any steps to get the certified copy of the agreement from the concerned department nor had summoned any official from the department to produce the certified copy of the original agreement. The reasons given by the trail court, while dismissing the application filed by the plaintiff, are sound reasons and call for no interference. Dismissed (SABINA) JUDGE March 09, 2011 Gurpreet