IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Criminal Misc. No. M-5202 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision:24.04.2008 Gurpreet Singh and others .....Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. Naresh Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, DAG, Punjab. **** RAJESH BINDAL J. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the only allegation against petitioner No.2 is that he had broken the front glass of the car and as regards petitioner No.3 is concerned, he gave a danda blow on the right leg of the complainant which injury was found to be simple in nature. It is not disputed that petitioners No.2 and 3, namely, Rinku Kumar and Surjit Singh have already joined investigation. Be that as it may, without opining on the merits of the controversy, interim bail already granted to the petitioners No.2 and 3 on 29.2.2008 is made absolute. The petition is disposed of. April 24, 2008 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) renu JUDGE