$~C-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO.A(SB) 13/2010 NIRMAL JAIN & ORS .....Appellant Through: Mr. T.K.Ganju, Sr. Advocate with Mr. C.S. Gupta, Advocate. versus JAYNA TIMES INDUSTRIES LTD. & ORS ......Respondent Through: Mr. Abhishek Kumar Rao & Mr. Shailesh Suman, Advocates for impleaders in CO. APPL. 360/2024. Ms. Malvika Trivedi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sujal Gupta, Ms. Aditi Saraswat and Ms.Puhumi Aditya, Advocates for R-1, 3 and 6 Mr. Arvind Varma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Bhardwaj, Ms. Aishwarya Singh, Mr.Souresh Nagar and Mr.Pratham Mahrotra, Advocates for 1, 5 and 8 to 11 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH O R D E R % 30.08.2024 CO.APPL. 758/2024 1. The instant application under Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 read with Section 151 and 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed by the applicants seeking the following reliefs:- “(a) Allow the present application and correct Para 4 under the heading Co. Appl 640/2024 (Amendment) of the order dated 22.07.2024 to the extent wherein the submission of the Applicants has been wrongly This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2024 at 11:48:17 recorded that the Application Co.Appl.640/2024 (Amendment) is being opposed by the Applicants and instead observe that the said application is being supported by the Applicants;” 2. After hearing the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the parties and perusing the contents made in the application, this Court is inclined to allow the instant application. Accordingly, the instant application is allowed and paragraph 4 of the order dated 22nd July, 2024 shall now read as under:- “4. Mr. Arvind Verma, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of non-applicants/ respondents No.1, 5 and 8 to 11 supported the instant application.” 3. The application is disposed of. CO.APPL. 759/2024 4. This application has been filed by the applicant for bringing legal representatives of respondent nos.3 and 4 on record. 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the non-applicants have no objection to the instant application being allowed. 6. Heard and perused the application. 7. After perusing the contents made in the applications, hearing the learned counsel for parties and keeping in view the no objection from the non-applicants, the instant application is allowed. Legal representatives of respondent no.3 and 4 are impleaded as respondents. 8. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. CO.APPL. 685/2023 9. This application has been filed by the applicant for bringing legal This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2024 at 11:48:17 representatives of late Mr. Vinod Kumar Jain on record. 10. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the non-applicants have no objection to the instant application being allowed. 11. Heard and perused the application. 12. After perusing the contents made in the applications, hearing the learned counsel for parties and keeping in view the no objection from the non-applicants, the instant application is allowed. Legal representatives of late Mr. Vinod Kumar Jain are impleaded as respondents. 13. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. CO.APPL. 760/2024 14. This application has been filed on behalf of respondent no.1, 2a, 5, 8, 10, 11 and 12 under Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking the following reliefs:- (a) Allow the present Application and permit the applicants to put the Unit-I on lease, dispose off the scrap machinery, tools, inventory and leasing out the working machinery after necessary repair work enabling the Applicants to carry out the Repair Works, monthly maintenance of Units and pay off the outstanding dues related to Unit-I & Unit-II of the Respondent Company; 15. Ms. Trivedi, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the non- applicants vehemently opposed the instant application on the ground of maintainability and prayed for three weeks’ time to file reply/objection. Let the reply/objection be filed within three weeks as prayed. 16. Mr. Ganju, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the other non-applicants also prayed for three weeks time to file reply. Let the same This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2024 at 11:48:17 be filed within three weeks as prayed. CO.APPL. 686/2023, CO.APPL. 22/2024, CO.APPL. 223/2024, CO.APPL. 224/2024, CO.APPL. 360/2024, CO.APPL. 640/2024, CO. APPLs. 756-57/2024 17. Issue notice to the newly added respondents through all permissible modes on filing PF within one week, returnable on 24th September, 2024. CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J AUGUST 30, 2024 NA/ ryp Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2024 at 11:48:17