IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 30083 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 18.10.2011 Mansa Ram ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. S.K. Sud, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Godara, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. …… RAJESH BINDAL, J. The petitioner in the present petition has directly approached this Court by filing pre-arrest bail petition, which cannot be entertained as the petitioner has to approach the Sessions Court first. Learned counsel for the petitioner referred to the case of co- accused and submitted that his petition was entertained directly. This cannot be treated as a precedent. At the time of hearing, the fact that the petitioner therein had approached this Court directly was not pointed out. The present petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Sessions Court first. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 18.10.2011 sharmila