IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15038 of 2011 PARAS SINGH @ PARAS NATH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324,302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Initially the petitioner was named as assailant in the F.I.R. but during investigation, the accusation was found false and final form was submitted. Now the petitioner has been summoned in exercise of power under Section 319 Cr. P. C. The impugned order does not reflect any discussion of the evidences which persuaded the trial court to summon the petitioner in exercise of power under Section 319 Cr. P. C. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Itarhi P.S. Case No. 81 of 2 2007 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J., F.T.C. III, Buxar, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner defaults for three consecutive occasions during trial. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)