IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1768 of 2006 PANKAJ PRAKASH Versus LAKSHMI DEVI & ORS. ----------- 3. 26.03.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Defendant–petitioner has filed this civil revision application challenging the order dated 19.8.2006 passed by the Subordinate Judge IV, Gaya in Title Suit No. 43 of 2005 by which the petition of the defendant-petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 (a) of the Code of Civil Procedure for rejecting the plaint has been dismissed. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no cause of action was mentioned in the plaint and the suit suffers from multiplicity of reliefs sought for by the plaintiff. The learned court below has discussed these aspects of the matter in the impugned order which stand supported by the pleadings made in the plaint, a copy whereof has been annexed as Annexure-1 to this revision application. - 2 - After going through the impugned order, this Court does not find any material irregularity in the order of the court below and hence, does not find any merit in the civil revision application. The application is, accordingly, dismissed. B.T. (J.N. Singh, J.)