IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.923 of 2007 Mahendra Kumar Sinha, son of Late Kameshwar Prasad, Resident of Mohalla- R.M.S. Colony, Road No. 3, Kankarbagh P.S.- Kankarbagh, District-Patna……Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Accountant General of Bihar, Birchandra Patel Path,Patna. 3. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Food Supply & Commerce Department, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, Bihar, Patna. 5. The Director, Consumer Protection, Bihar, Patna. 6. The Secretary to the Chairman, State Commission for Consumer Protection, Biscomaun Towr, Patna. ………Respondents. ----------- 3. 16. 04. 09. Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and Respondent Food Corporation as also Respondent Nos. 2 and 4. The primary grievance of the petitioner is that service rendered by him in the Corporation ought to have been counted for the purpose of retiral dues. Learned counsel for the State submits that the past period of service rendered by the petitioner in the Corporation, is not liable to be counted for deciding the retiral dues. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent have not passed any specific order with regard to its entitlement of the petitioner for counting the service rendered by him by the Corporation as such the petitioner perhaps, to file specific representation with supporting documents before Respondent No. 3 within a period of six weeks along with certified - 2 - copy of present order. In case such representation is filed before Respondent No.3, he shall consider the same and dispose of the representation filed by the petitioner by a reasoned order in accordance with law. Upon such consideration, in case representation is disposed of in favour of the petitioner, the Respondent No. 3 shall simultaneously issue necessary order so that grievance of the petitioner raised in his representation to be redressed without delay expeditiously preferably within four months on receipt of representation. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ application is disposed of accordingly. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)