1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.12.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P(MD)No.15316 of 2011 R.Hari Krishnan ... Petitioner/Complainant Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Trichy - 20, Trichy District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Manapparai Police Station, Manapparai, Trichy District. ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to direct the second respondent to comply the direction issued in Crl.M.P.No.308 of 2011 on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai dated 0n 24.03.2011 within the stipulated period as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner :: Mr.R.Sundar For Respondents :: Mr.P.Kannithevan Govt. Advocate (Crl. side) O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to comply the direction issued in Crl.M.P.No.308 of 2011 on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai dated on 24.03.2011 within the stipulated period as may be fixed by this Court. 2. Heard Mr.R.Sundar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Kannithevan, learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the second respondent police was directed to comply with the direction issued by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai in Crl.M.P.No.308 of 2011 dated 24.03.2011, by examining one Kannan and to do proper investigation and to file charge sheet. He would further submit that the said direction was not obeyed by the second respondent police, since he has replied to the querry made under Right https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Information Act. Therefore, he did not receive any order from the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai in Crl.M.P.No.308 of 2011 and if such an order has been received by him, he would comply with the said order. 4. The leaned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit in his argument that if any order has been received by the second respondent police, he would obey the order and suitable direction may be given to the second respondent police to comply with the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) that he would instruct the second respondent police to comply with the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai in Crl.M.P.No.308 of 2011 and to do proper investigation, this Court is inclined to pass an order against the second respondent police to comply with the direction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai passed in his order made in Crl.M.P.No.308 of 2011 dated 24.03.2011 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, this petition is ordered. Sd/- Assistant Registrat(T&P) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Trichy - 20, Trichy District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Manapparai Police Station, Manapparai, Trichy District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai +One Cc to Mr.R.Sundar , Advocate, SR.No.42753 vsm rl/5c – 19.12.2011 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15316 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/