PETITIONER Versus Food Corporation of lndia, District Manager, Link Raad, !n front of CMD College. Bilaspur (CG). Senior Regional Officer, Food Corporation . of lndia, Teli Banda, Raipur (CG). Zonal Manager (West), Mistri Bhawan, Dinshaw Wacha‘ Road; Church‘Gate, Mumbai —- 20 (MS). The Asst. Manager, Food corporation of . india, Tarbahar, Bilaspur, Dist. Biiaspur (CG). 5., Union of India, through the Chief - Secretary, Department of Personnei & Training &, Public Grievances; $hastri > Marg, New Delhi. ‘ RESPONDENTS (Writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitunonof lndia) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. r ‘ Present :— Shri Deepak Jain. counsel for the petitioner. $hri B.P. Gupta, counsel for the respondenie No.1 to 4. ' V ORDE L (Passed on this 7 day of September, 2009) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.. 2. submits that the petitioner does not want tooontest this petition on merits at this stage; however, he seeks liberty to make a representation to the respondent authorities, which may be considered and decided as expeditiously as possible. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents No.1 to 4 submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided within a eriod of six Weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 4. ln view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petttioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dispo of. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instruotions, . El Sdl- satish K. AgnihWi i i, Judge ‘ p