asBi iS ^"SBNi^, i"yi8t "'^i? ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. Sc-7^, / 2004 Petitioners 'l. ,2. Baishakhu S/o Budhu Diwar, aged about 55 years, R/o Village Buderfa, P.0. Kharora, Post Office, Kharora, Dist 'Raipur (C.G.j. Kisun S/o Sukhlal Dhiwar, aged about 53 years, R/o Village & Post Kanki, Village Kharora, P.S. Kharora, Dist : Raipur (C.G.). versus Respondents /'o ^-7 -.-•"'' S>>-<s'- _•••' '"/•••*'.. ^ .s?" ..-•/.sy"' ^-<i?~ ^y^y ^•--^ ^iu~ 2. .3. 4. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy Department of Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). Engineer in ChiefP.W.D. (Eastj Behind Radio Station, Raipur (C.G.j. S.D.O. (T & M) Sub Division P.W.D. (B Ss R), Baloda Bazar, Raipur (C.G-). S.D.O. (B & R) P.W.D., Medical CoUege, Sub- Division, Raipur (C.G.j. Executive Eagineer P.W.D. Division 2, Baloda Bazar, Dist : Raipur (C.G.j. Executive Engineer P.W.D. Division 1, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT U/A 226 / 227 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AWRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION, CERTERIORAI ETC OR ANY OTHER DIRECTIONS x'.-5. OR ORDER '". :'L^-'?- ^-•'^'••.['^^"^Sfff. fc^ XI-HC—7S '<T£? =a:!1'!ifl'?T3T. '"^T^FTS, TawTKTT ^A^^^^..^...^.....^.^.^ -A ^asprft xi'yn' ( '{S(P{S^) WiS ..-A>k L.. ruCt. ^7^fi7'r^"?s' '^T£j^7T ^F SJtH^ ^ 'i^^S:' TT^-K^ •-S-3!^-;:! Shri Ashok Patil, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, learned P.LJfortlie State/respondents. 1 The petitioners by way of this |nsSant petition has challenged their 1 -etirement order ofAnnexures P/1 and p/2. Learned counsei for the petitiorjers submits that the petitioner have |been retired beftire attaining 62 year^ of age whereas they are jeligible for service. Learned counse! fiirther submits that except these two 1 jpetitioners other employees who are sjmilarly placed have not been retired ?. jand therefore the petitioner should j be reinstated with back wages. Learned counsel submits that the encjs of justtee would be served if the ipetitioners are allowed to make d representation detailing al! the I ' • ~ • Igrievances which are raised in this petitjion, before the respondents. have heard tearned counsel forjthe petitioners. ^ j Considering the facts and circi|mstances of the case, 1 am of the iview that it wouid be just and proper jf the petitioners are given liberty to jsubmit a detailed representation befor^ the respondents mentioning ali the jgrounds which have been raised by t|iem in this petition, along with copy lof this order within 15 days from to^ay which shall be decided by the 3 irespondents within two months after rejseipt ofsuch representation. 1!_..... 1 Ordered accordingly. | 1 With the aforesaid observation, ^he petition stands disposed of. ! . E _„,. Certified copy as per rules. Dhirendra Mishra Judge