y IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURIC.G.l M.A.No.....\y.(:|...../08 (S.BJ APELLANT PLAINTIFF N /f VERSUS i'>nn;:9' RESPONDENTS DEFENDENTS l^y OK^^" l^'/"1 Tirith Ram Sahu S/o Bhuwan Lal Sahu Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Gokulpur Teh. Takhatpur' Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) 1. Bhuwan Lal Sahu S/0 Late Ramadin Sahu Aged About 80 Years, R/o Village ,A Gokulpur ,Teh.-Takhatpur Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) Present Resident- C/o Lomasram Sahu , Village Mochh, Teh.-Takhatpur Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Juthil Ram Sahu S/o Manohar, Aged About 47 Years 3. Maniram Suryawansi S/g^ Ram Singh, Aged About 50 Years, Both are R/o Village Nevara Teh.- Takhatpur Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULB l(r) & 2 OF CFVIL PROCEDURE CODE t^ ^ ^ 1 II t)M SC-78 vj-CE) ^ll^lct^, t»Ti1o<IS,Iqrtltiax .ftfV^ (<TO- I-I^IP^ *ll*irti JStflV SII^ST q^cp (I'llgq's) V^9Q SII^awR'fitb ciaiT3iA?r**ii* ETOTWttlEa SK^S S.B. Hon'bleShn Justice N.K. Aaan.'va! *|i|id41'< *<l*ldl"^ffa>cl tluit^it ^srf^TSII^ST The appea! as aiso dism None for the appellant. Shri Ravindra Agrswal, coipnsel for respondents No.1 to 3. ised in default on 05-01-: and thereafter, it was restored, t^en again was dismissed on 05- 11-2009. Then again the matter ^as restored on 11-02-2010. Today also the matter occaslons, none appears nor ai behsif of the appellant. It seem is caiied twice. On both iy representatlon is made on fe that the appe!!ant may not be jnterested in prosecuting the matt^r. Accordingly, the appeal is cjismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge 'SM iiu