AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2421 OF 2009 Dr. Aspi B. Surveyor & Anr. ... Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. J. S. Chandnani for the petitioners. Mr. V.S. Gokhale, A.G.P. for the State. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 7TH AUGUST, 2009. P.C.:- 1. Learned counsel for the parties are agreed that this petition is squarely covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of this court in Voltas Limited & Anr. v. Additional Collector and Competent Authority, Thane Urban Agglomeration & Ors. 2008 (5) Bom.C.R. 746. AJN 2 2. In the affidavit in reply filed by Dattatraya Sambhaji Doifode, the Deputy Collector and Competent Authority, Ulhasnagar Urban, Agglomeration, Thane, it is stated that notification under section 10(3) of the UCLR Act was published in the Government Gazette on 15/11/2007. It is further stated that the possession of the surplus land has not been taken by the respondents. In view of this assertion made in the affidavit, the petition is allowed in terms of the judgment of this court in Voltas Limited’s case referred to hereinabove. Needless to say that the petition is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) qua the petitioners’ lands which were held to be surplus and described in notification dated 28/6/2007. 3. The petition is disposed of in the aforestated terms. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [A.A. SAYED, J.]