1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.267 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4693 OF 2009 Ms.Seema Dhanajirao Chavan ...Appellant Versus The Secretary, Palus Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Palus & Ors. ....Respondents ...... Mr.Pratap Patil for Appellant. Mr.G.T.Kamble i/b Mr.S.G.Deshmukh for Respondents 1 & 2. Mr.S.D.Rairkar, A.G.P. for State. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 21, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the Appellant. The Appellant essentially raises issue regarding the correctness of finding of fact recorded by the Courts below. In the first place, that cannot be the scope for interference in this Appeal. Besides, in our opinion, we find no infirmity in the finding of fact recorded by the Tribunal and as confirmed by the learned Single Judge of this Court. In view of the said finding, the conclusion reached is inevitable. No interference is warranted. Dismissed. J.P.DEVADHAR, J. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.