THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.18835 of 1996 ORAL ORDER: The learned counsel for petitioner states that he had already given up vakalat as early as in the year 1996. When the matter was called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Even otherwise, nothing remains in the writ petition for adjudication at this length of time. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 5.12.2006 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.18835 of 1996 5.12.2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.18835 of 1996 Date: 5th December, 2006 Between: P.Shobarani & others. .. Petitioner And The Govt. of A.P., rep. by its Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad & others. .. Respondents