IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11459 of 2011 MANOJ ROY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 21.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is neither named in the FIR neither anything has been recovered from his conscious possession. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the name of this pdtitioner came in this case on the basis of statement made by one shopkeeper who stated that he had sold one Sim card to the petitioner. It is further pointed out by him that in course of investigation, it came to light that the aforesaid Sim card stood in the name of one, Budhani Devi and furthermore, above-said Sim card was used in stolen mobile. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Manoj Roy be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Musrigharari P.S. Case No. 105 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)