IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12073 of 2008 ASHISH KUMAR @ PINKU KUMAR MEHTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 5/5/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a police case under Sections- 461 and 379 of I.P.C. The submission is that the materials in paragraphs-48 to 50 of the case diary, based on which the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner has been rejected, were statements attributed to another co- accused when the petitioner denies ownership of the godown. The brother of the petitioner has been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.P.No.5713/07 by the Sessions Judge, Patna when he himself made a statement that recovery had been made from the godown of his brother i.e. the present petitioner from whom he was separate in business. This Court is not persuaded to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on his behalf shall considered by the court below on its own merits, without being prejudiced by the present order. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )