IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. m 7717 OF 2010 Date of decision: 10.5.2010 Vazeer Singh Petitioner vs. State of Punjab Respondent Present: Mr. Rajesh Chaudhary, Advocate for Mr. As Dhaliwal, Advocate. Mr. Abishek Chauthala, AAG, Pb M.M.S.BEDI,J. The main allegation is against the petitioner's brother Sukhdev Singh, who had allegedly stolen money from the house of complainant Sham Lal. The petitioner along with others was allegedly standing out side the house at the time of alleged theft. It is alleged that the petitioner had received stolen foreign currency notes from the main accused Sukhdev Singh. In view of the fact that the only evidence against the petitioner is the disclosure statement of his brother Sukhdev Singh, it will certainly be a moot point during trial whether the said statement of an accomplice would be admissible to seek the conviction of the petitioner. The petition is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner will join the investigation as and when a written notice is issued to him to join the investigation. In case of non compliance of any such written notice to join the investigation, it will be open to the investigating agency to seek cancellation of pre-arrest bail granted to the petitioner. He will not interference in the investigation or tamper with the investigation. The petitioner will be required to furnish fresh bail bonds by putting an appearance before the Illaqa Magistrate as and when the prosecution agency opts to present challan against him. May 10 ,2010 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE