WP(C) 5720/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI Heard Ms. N. Baruah, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petition er, and Ms. D. Sinha, learned Central Government Counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 1. Also heard Mr. B.C. Saikia, learned State Counsel, appear ing on behalf of the State respondents, and Mr. M.K. Choudhury, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent No. 3, 4 & 5. The petitioner’s grievances are, in brief, thus : The petitioner had applied for admission into the Bachelor of Homeopathy Medicine and Surgery (for short ’BHMS’) under the National Institute of Homeopathy, Kolkata, as a candidat e belonging to OBC (Non Creamy-Layer). The petitioner alleges that he has not be en admitted into the BHMS course by the National Institute of Homeopathy, Kolkat a, on account of the fact that the petitioner has not been issued the OBC Non-Cr eamy Layer certificate, though he applied for the same to the respondent No.2, namely, the Deputy Commissioner, Kamrup(Metro), Guwahati. To a query made by this Court, Ms. N. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that she is not aware if the State Government has identifie d the Non-Creamy Layer, in OBC, in this State. At the same time, the learned cou nsel, for the parties, also submits that any delay in the disposal of the writ p etition, may adversely affect the interest of the parties concerned and, hence, a direction may be issued to the respondent No. 2, namely, the Deputy Commission er to examine the matter in the light of the relevant State Government policy, g uidelines and the law. To the submissions so made, no objection has been raised by the learne d Central Government Counsel or by the learned State Counsel. Considering the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justice, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent No. 2, namel y, the Deputy Commissioner, Kamrup(Metro), Guwahati, to examine the petitioner’s grievances in the light of the relevant State Govt. policy, guidelines and the law, and, then, pass appropriate order in accordance with law. The whole exercise, so directed, shall be completed within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order by the resp ondent No. 2. Whatever decision is arrived at by the respondent No. 2, namely, the De puty Commissioner, Kamrup(Metro), Guwahati, and whatever order is passed by the respondent No. 2 in this regard, the same shall be communicated in writing, t o the petitioner. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decisions, which may be taken by the respondent No. 2, or by the order(s), which may be passed by the respondents/authorities concerned, the petitioner shall remain at liberty to ta ke recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. The petitioner may furnish a certified copy of this order to the respond ent No. 2, namely, the Deputy Commissioner, Kamrup(Metro), Guwahati, alongwith a copy of the writ petition and the annexures appended thereto. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition shall sta nd disposed of. No order as to costs.