IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25461 of 2010 AJAY KUMAR SINHA son of late Nareshwar Prasad ----Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU.VIGILANCE . ----------- 3. 1.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Income of one Ramashish Singh was found disproportionate to his known sources of income. In that continuation N.G.O. came in picture. Wife of Ramashish Singh was treasurer of the same. Petitioner is a contractor who works in name of Warsi Construction. His role is construction of school building. He has submitted bill for Rs.58 lacs. In course of investigation though has come that no details of expenditure was given by this petitioner including the sources of money which he invested in construction of the building but till today, according to the petitioner, only Rs.15 lacs is paid to him and in no case fixing liability for offence under Prevention of Corruption Act, refusal of anticipatory bail is not justified. Further more, treasurer of the N.G.O. , wife of Ramashish Singh , has already been allowed bail by a Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. no.15858 of 2010. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of reciept/production of a copy of this order, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Vigilance 1st , Patna, in connection with Special Case no.20 of 2006 arising out of Vigilance 2 P.S. case no.25 of 2006. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J.)