1 7.wp2384.11 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2384 OF 2011 Saraswat Co-op. Bank Ltd. ....Petitioner Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai. ....Respondent. Mr. G.V. Murthy with Mr. A.K. Saxena i/b. Murti & Asso. for Petitioner. Mr. M.M. Malvankar, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM:- GIRISH GODBOLE, J DATED:- DECEMBER 23, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard Mr. Murthy, Advocate for Petitioner and Mr. Malvankar, Advocate for the Respondent. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard by consent of the parties. 3. Though complete copy of the impugned Order is not available on record, this Petition is being disposed off in view of the fact that even 2 7.wp2384.11 according to the impugned order the delay in filing the Municipal Appeal is not substantial. 4. 12/1/2011 is the date on which the complaint filed by the Petitioner was disposed off. The period of 21 days will come to an end on 2/2/2011. The Municipal Appeal is admittedly filed on 7/2/2011. Hence, in the interest of justice without requiring the Petitioner to file another application for condonation of delay of 5 days, this Writ Petition is disposed of by condoning the delay in filing the Municipal Appeal. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs. The Municipal Appeal will now be heard on merits subject to the requirement of pre-deposit of taxes. (GIRISH GODBOLE, J)