IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 142 OF 2010 IN STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 1454 OF 2010 STATE OF GOA ... Applicant Versus M/S. VINMED LABORATORIES PVT. LTD., ... Respondent Mr. C. A. Ferreira, Public Prosecutor for the applicant. Mr. D. S. Hatle, Advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr. S. G. Bhobe, Advocate for respondent no.6. None for the other respondents, though served. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 2nd February, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. Ferreria, learned Public Prosecutor for the applicant, Mr. Hatle, learned Counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2 and Mr. Bhobe, learned Counsel for respondent no.6. 2. By this application under Section 378(4),Cr.P.C., the applicant seeks special leave to appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 15th December, 2009 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bicholim in Criminal Case No.52/OA/1999/A. 3. Having heard learned Public Prosecutor for the applicant, Mr. Hatle, learned Counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2 and Mr. Bhobe, learned Counsel for respondent no.6, I am of the considered opinion that this is not a case in which the findings recorded by the learned Magistrate can be said to be perverse warranting interference in appeal against the acquittal. In my considered opinion, the view taken by the learned Magistrate while recording the findings in favour of the accused cannot be said to be illegal or not borne out from the evidence on record. 4. In view of the above, no case is made out for grant of special leave to appeal. Hence, the application is dismissed. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA