WP(C) 3073/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. J Payeng, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. M Gogoi Medhi, le arned Standing Counsel, Education Department, Assam. The petitioner who is a teacher of the Rowmari ME Madrassa is before this Court with the grievance that though her institution has been awarded financial assist ance on 20.04.2011, on extraneous consideration, the Headmaster thereof in order to deprive her therefrom has described her to be a sectional teacher in the par ticulars furnished to the concerned departmental authorities. According to the p etitioner she is an Assistant Teacher of the institution and in terms of her ser vice seniority she is entitled to her share of financial assistance earmarked fo r the Madrassa. Being aggrieved, she has, in the meantime, submitted a represent ation before the District Elementary Education Officer, Barpeta on 25.05.2011, w hich has remained unattended till date. In these circumstances, the petitioner s eeks the intervention of this Court. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on a consideration of the pleadings available on record as well as the documents laid before this Court, i t is considered appropriate to close the instant proceeding with a direction to the District Elementary Education Officer, Barpeta to decide on the petitioner’s representation dated 25.05.2011 within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order along with that of a copy of the writ petition and its annexures. Ordered accordingly. The aforementioned departm ental authority would make necessary inquiries as deemed fit in deciding the rep resentation and would ensure that till the same is disposed of, disbursement of the amount of financial assistance in full is not effected vis-a-vis the Madrass a. No costs.