IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6683 of 2009 PANNALAL PATEL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 1.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the complainant was suffering from ailment. She was being provided medical aid and his father could know about her suffering from ailment when he came to petitioner’s house. According to learned counsel, this much goes to show that if the disease from which the complainant was suffering, was due to torture then that ought to be reported to the father. The marriage was performed in the year 2004 but for the first time the father could know the same in the year 2008, that also finding the complainant lying on bed due to some disease. She was taken by her father and there is no allegation that there was any objection on behalf of the petitioner though about all her articles including ornaments and clothes were kept by them. Further there is allegation regarding petitioner’s non-approaching the complainant’s parents house to see his ailing wife who died later due to her ailment. According to learned counsel, the demand shown which is of motorcycle and a ring is not believable. Taking into view the status of the family, in my view, also the allegation leveled against the petitioner does not justify his arrest. In the facts of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case No.1549/08, Tr.no. - 2 - 4002/08, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar Motihari, East Champaran, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI