IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.8942 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : JULY 16, 2010 SH. PRITAM SINGH JAWANDA ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Bikram Jit Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. BS Chahal, DAG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1. Challenge in this petition is to letter dated 25.8.2005 (Annexure P-6) and notice dated 21.10.2005 (Annexure P-7). 2. Vide Annexure P-6, the Punjab Government has given approval in the name of the Governor of Punjab to institute a civil suit for recovery from the petitioner. 3. Vide Annexure P-7, notice was issued to the petitioner for recovery, before institution of the civil suit. 4. Since the civil suit has already been filed, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn to enable to petitioner to take all the pleas before the civil court, including the Civil Writ Petition No.8942 of 2009 2 plea that it is a frivolous suit and has been filed so as to cause harassment to the petitioner, who is a retired employee and an aged person. 5. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. July 16, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?