@ $§§gg§g§ agm 6 ,5“ WOJL/ @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR wms.) No. B5”? /2009 PETITIONER ( Ashish Kumar Sharma S/ o Shri Jairam Prasad Shanna, Aged f WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF , APPROPRIATE WRITISI OR ORDER(S) OR DIRECTIONIS) f qy\§\7§/;/<9W \Nxt‘p a? .~ \9x E ‘ TS Q\ years, 563, Nagar, Near Footbal House, Rajpur, District Raipur (CO) ‘Juyi‘\" g: /& $3“ F5 ,x‘ " VERSUS z Q Q‘gf RESPONDENTS I. State of Chhatasgarh Through; Secretaly Nagn'ya Prashashem D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) /2. The Chief Executive OiEcer, Chhattisgarh Gramin Sadak Vikas Abhikaran Civil Lines Raipur District Raipur (CO) @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR wm Pemioa (s3 No. 1357 omoog Ashish Kumar Shamm Versus Petitionsr Respondsnts ‘ State of Chhattisgarh 55 anothér (Writ Petition under AITicls 226 of the Constitution of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihoti‘i J.) GRDER omi) ( Passed on this 2nd day of Fobmaxy, 2O 10 ) Heard. Lemed counsel appean'mg for the petifionor submits that with tho passage of fime this pafition has become. infructuous. Learned couasel appearing for om respondent No.1] State has 11o objecg‘on. In View of the foregoing, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. go 9). Tbakulr \ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge i Sd/— V Ms Morisha Chattri, Advocate for the petitioner. $hn' M. P. S. Bhatia, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondent No. 1. None for the respondent No.2.