SM 1 16.ao.472.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 472 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 661 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 472 OF 2011 Shri. Basavaraj Ballapa Girisagar and ors. ....Appellants. Versus Shri. Shankar Narhari Gurav and others ....Respondents. ____________ Mr. Anil Anturkar, Counsel i/b IC Legal for the Appellants. Mr. Y. S. Jahagirdar, Sr. Counsel i/b S. S. Kanetkar for the Respondent Nos. 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 22 to 28, 29(A), 30 to 34, 35 (a) to 35 (c), 36 to 39i, 40(A) to 40 (D), 43, 44 to 51, 51, 52, 53, 55, 56, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 to 65, CORAM: R. M. BORDE, J. DATED : DECEMBER 12, 2011. P.C.: The only objection raised in the appeal is as regards the failure of the Trial Court to pass any order under Section 9A(2). 2. The Trial Court has refused to pass an order as contemplated by Section 9A (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure where the preliminary objections of jurisdiction and entertainability of the suit as contemplated by Section 9A of the Code of Civil Procedure are raised. However, it does not preclude the Court from passing any order as contemplated by Section 9A (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure. 3. In these circumstances, the Trial Court is directed to consider the application tendered by the plaintiff for interim SM 2 16.ao.472.11 orders under Section 9A(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure and pass appropriate orders within three weeks from today. (R. M. BORDE, J.)