IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE Writ Petition No. 3826 of 2007 Smt.Tejaswini Nandkumar Patil ..Petitioner vs 1. Shri Tanaji Shivram Mahadik and others ..Respondents Shri Pratap Patil for petitioner. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. J. J. 4th July, 2007 July, 2007 July, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Shri Patil appearing for the petitioner. Perused the impugned interlocutory order. There is no reason to interfere with the same in as much as the petitioner is always at liberty to challenge the final order in the suit if the same is adverse to him and while doing so, also impugn the present interlocutory order as well. All contentions in that behalf of both sides are expressly kept open for being raised and adjudicated in such proceedings. Needless to further add that the petitioner would also be at liberty to urge all the grounds which are raised in the present petition. Petition is disposed of accordingly. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)