IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 5466 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 5466 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 5466 OF 2008 Udaysing Yeshwantrao Deshmukh. ... Petitioner. V/s. Shri Yeshwant Krishna Dhole & ors. ... Respondents. A.M.Kulkarni for the petitioner. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 24th September 2008. DATED: 24th September 2008. DATED: 24th September 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This petition is directed against the order dated 17th April, 2008, whereby the application for setting aside the order of not allowing cross-examination of Yashwant Dhole and seeking further permission to lead evidence on behalf of the petitioner came to be rejected. 3. The factual matrix drawn in the impugned order appears to have been correctly sketched. Therefore, it is not necessary to reproduce the same once again. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, no interference with the impugned order is necessary except small clarification that if the petitioner deposits the amount of no fault liability with the Tribunal within three weeks from the date of this order, the Tribunal may permit the petitioner to cross-examine the witness and lead his evidence. 5. In the event of such deposit, the Tribunal shall not permit any party to withdraw this amount. It shall be invested in the fixed deposit with any nationalised bank. The deposit of amount shall be subject to the result of the final decision in the claim petition pending before the Tribunal. Needless to mention that if the petitioner fails to comply with this order within the stipulated time, this petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed in limine. 4. Petition is disposed of in terms of this order with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)