FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION No.6642 OF 2006. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Court or Judge’s Order. Memorandum of Coram : apperance,Court’s : Orders & Directions : and Registrar’s : Order. : -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. C.K. Tripathi,Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.G. Toraskar, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM:R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J. CORAM:R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J. CORAM:R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J. DATED:1ST DATED:1ST DATED:1ST DECEMBER,2006. DECEMBER,2006. DECEMBER,2006. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner challenges order dated 21st August, 2006, passed by the Trial Court rejecting the application filed by the Petitioner for direction to the Respondent to deposit the permitted increase in the rent. Undisputedly, the application has been rejected solely on the ground of absence of any material in support of the contention of the petitioner about the permitted increase. Nothing prevents the petitioner from [ 2 ] moving further application with necessary evidence in support of his claim about permitted increase in the rent. If such an application is filed, the Trial Court will have to decide the same after hearing the parties in accordance with the provisions of law. With this observation, the petition is rejected. [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.] [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.] [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.]