IN THE HIGH COUR OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1222 of 2004 (M/B) 1. Dev Krishna S/o Sri Sant Ram Smt. Pramila Devi W/o Sri Dev Krishna, Both at present R/o Safipur (Subhash Nagar), Roorkee, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar. ………….. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Collector Haridwar, District Haridwar. 2. Up Zila Adhikari, Roorkee, District Haridwar. 3. Tehsildar Roorkee/Auction Officer, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar. 4. Smt. Prakashwati W/o Sri Jagdish Singh, D/o Takura Bihari Singh, At present R/o House No. 147/48, Indra Colony Sarsawa, Pargana Sarsawa, Tehsil Nakud, Distinct Saharanpur (U.P.) …………. Respondents Mr. Lok Pal Singh, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioners. Mr. J.P. Joshi, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents No.1 to 3. Coram: Hon. V.S. Sirpurkar, C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. (Per Hon’ble the Chief Justice) 1. Heard Mr. Lok Pal Singh, Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. J.P. Joshi, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. 2. Mr. J.P. Joshi, learned Government pleader very fairly agrees to decide the objections raised by the petitioners before the Collector. Such objections shall be decided within this period of one month. The auction, if it has not already taken place, shall not be done within this period of one month. The time schedule shall be very strictly adhered to. 3. The writ petition is disposed of in above terms. It needless to say that if the petitioners are aggrieved by that, the petitioners will have a liberty to approach the Court again. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) (V.S. Sirpurkar C.J.) 16.12.2004 16.12.2004 G