IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.193 of 2004 JAGAT LAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2/ 19/03/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This Court in C.W.J.C. No.1427/01 held that the departmental proceedings had been concluded within the time fixed and the communication of the order beyond that period was of no consequence. It further held that non-supply of the enquiry report had caused no prejudice and even on quantum it was not disproportionate. The submission relying on AIR 1966 SC 1313 (State of Punjab v. Amar Singh Harika) is that the date of communication of the order was a part of the direction for completion of the proceedings, the finding that non-supply of the enquiry report had caused no prejudice and ultimately that the nature of the punishment could not have been imposed, this Court is satisfied when it is being invited into an arena which goes beyond the jurisdiction of the Review Court. The application is dismissed. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)