IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4355 of 1996 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- K R EDUCATION AND CHARITABLE TRUST Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR NC SHAH for Petitioner MR KC SHAH, AGP for Respondents. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH Date of decision: 01/10/96 ORAL JUDGEMENT Rule. Service of rule waived by Mr. K.C. Shah, Ld. AGP for the respondents. 2. The impugned decision dated 31/1/1996 Annexure-O is rendered by the Deputy Director of Education (Vocational). The grievance of the petitioner is that the report of hearing of 26/7/1995 appears to have not been considered. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would make a detailed representation dealing with the grounds of rejection. 3. Having heard the learned advocate for the petitioner and Ld. AGP for the State and bearing in mind the facts and circumstances of the case, following direction is required to be issued :- The petitioner is directed to make fresh representation to the appropriate authority dealing with the grounds of rejection. As and when such a representation is made, the same shall be considered afresh in accordance with law and the rules without being influenced by the impugned order of rejection of permission of one class of office management in Standard XI (vocational stream), as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 2 months from the date of receipt of writ of this order. In view of the aforesaid direction, nothing further survives in this petition. Hence, rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent only. No order as to cost. * * *