THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 6729 OF 2007 Dated 18th June, 2010 Between: E.Srinivas Goud …Petitioner And The Prohibition and Excise Superintendent-cum- Functional Registrar, Toddy Tappers Cooperative Societies And another …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri G.Krishna for Sri T.Amarnath Goud Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Prohibition and Excise The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring Rc.No.B1/726/2006, dated 10.01.2007 of the 1st respondent as confirmed by the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.B2/95/2007, dated 26.03.2007 as illegal, arbitrary and against principles of natural justice and to set aside the same.” At the hearing, Sri G.Krishna, learned counsel representing Sri T.Amarnath Goud, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP Nos.8605 and 9053 of 2007 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 18th June, 2010 vrn