((-1-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.200 OF 2009 IN APPEAL NO.29 OF 2008 AND CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.201 OF 2009 IN APPEAL NO.28 OF 2008 AND CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.202 OF 2009 IN APPEAL NO.30 OF 2008 Rashmin P. Chheda Applicant (In all Revision Aplications) versus Mrs.Preeti Yogesh Shah & anr. Respondents (In all Revision Applications) J.S.Kini i/by Suresh Dubey for applicant. S.S.Pednekar, APP for the State. Malika Ingale for resondent no.1. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 13th April 2009 PC : 1. Not on board. Taken on board. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the parties have tendered consent terms duly signed by the applicant and the first respondent. They state ((-2-)) that the parties are present and they accept that whatever is mentioned in the consent terms is true and correct. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. 3. In view of the agreement recorded in the consent terms, the impugned judgements and orders are quashed and set aside and the applicant is acquitted of the offence alleged against him. The revision applications are accordingly allowed. 4. The original complainant is permitted to withdraw the amounts deposited by the accused with the Trial Court. 5. In view of the orders passed in the revision applications, the application for bail will not survive and the same shall stand disposed of. (A.S.OKA, J.)