H!Sj±£^ySTJO£J5iMATTiSjQAR^LA^B!LASPUR W"t PstiSlon Ho. 588 of2QG2 Petitioner Gautam Khetrapal S/o Kailash Chandra Khetrapa!, aged about 25 years, R/o New Sarkanda, Biiaspur, Bilaspur-(C.G.) Respondents Versus 1 Bar Council of India, Constituted Under Section-4 of the Advocates Act, 1961, a body corporate having perpetual succession and common sea!, 21, Rouse Avenue institute Area, New Delhi. 2 Hon'b'e High Court of Judicature At Biiaspur (Chhattisgarh) through its Registrar General, Bi!aspur-(C.G.) 3 State Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh a body corporate having perpetua! succsssion and common seai. Bar Councii Buiiding, High Court Prem'sis, Jabalpur (M.P.) WRJT PETJTJON UNDERARnCLE 226 OF THE CONSTLTUT1Q110F INDIA SB: Hon'bie Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Shri Adii Minhaj, Advocate for the petitioner, ..OR^iE^ (Passed on thfs29ffidayof June, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that with the passage oftime, thls petition has become infructuous. 2. Consequently, the writ petition js dismissed as having become infructuous. B/- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge