1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.943 OF 2007 IN ADMIRALTY SUIT NO.3 OF 2007 Pacific Leathers Finishers ..Plaintiffs V/s. Allcargo Movers India Pvt.Ltd. & ors ..Defendants And M/s.Super Tannery (India) ..Applicants Mr.Ashwin Shankar, Advocate, for Plaintiffs Mr.A.K.Saxena, Advocate, for Applicants Ms.Bharti Narichania i/b.Vibha Juriconsult & Co., Advocate, for Defendant No.1 CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J 28TH JANUARY, 2008 P.C. . The Chamber Summons has been taken out by a Company by the name of Super Tannery(India) for a direction to the Plaintiffs to amend the address of the Third Defendant. The Third Defendant to the suit has been described thus :- “Supergan s.r.o., a foreign Company having office at Dukeska 57C, Brno Czech Republic, Ph/Fax No.00420 545-214684 supergan@volny.cz also having office at C/o M/s Super Tannery (India), Jajmau, Kanpur 208010, Uttar Pradesh” 2. The Applicant has stated that the Third 2 Defendant was one of its buyers but the Applicant does not have any connection with the Third Defendant. An affidavit has been filed by the Plaintiffs and the main contention of the Plaintiffs is that the Applicant was at some time in the past a shareholder of the Third Defendant. The Third Defendant is a Foreign Company based in the Czech Republic. Obviously, even, if the Applicant held any part of the share capital of the Foreign Company that would not be sufficient to treat the address of the Applicant as sufficient service upon the Foreign Company. The Applicant is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and is an independent Corporate body. The Chamber Summons is accordingly made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).