IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1238 of 2010 NARAYAN SAO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 03. 06.04.2011 This case has come at the instance of the petitioner. It has been pointed out that in the last paragraph of the first page of the order dated 18.03.2011, instead of the word “respondent no. 3” due to inadvertence it has been mentioned as “respondent no. 5”. Similarly, in the second page of the first paragraph, it has also been mentioned as “respondent no. 5” instead of “respondent no. 3”. Let all the two places the word “respondent no. 5” be read as “respondent no. 3”. The time indicated for filing the application is extended by another three weeks. Accordingly, the order dated 18.03.2011 is modified to the above extent. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)