IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.90 of 2010 AMIT KUMAR SRIWASTAVA Versus 1. The STATE OF BIHAR 2. Smt. Priyanka ------ 10/ 13.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Torture followed by assault and other ways is there but for a simple reason for demand of Rs. Five lacs in dowry to purchase a flat in Delhi. After going through the F.I.R., demand appears doubtful as while marriage was to be solemnized, petitioner’s father fell ill and money, if any, was given that was as debt. Complaint to S.P., Zind is there at informant’s hand, while Divorce Case is filed by the petitioner. Specifically, it is said that differences are otherwise for matrimonial cause and to cast pressure only, this complaint petition is filed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 156 of 2009 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bettiah subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)