IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15290 of 2001 BALAKANT CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 12 07.01.2010 This case has been listed under the heading “To Be Mentioned” at the instance of learned counsel for the petitioner. He points out that on page 12 of the judgment in 11th line the date of resolution of the Managing Committee has wrongly been mentioned as 30.5.1997, it should be 30.5.1977. He also points out that in the cause title of the judgment the description of respondent no. 7 has been mentioned as Vice-Chancellor, KSDU, Darbhanga. It should be Vice-Chancellor, KSDSU, Darbhanga. Learned counsel for the State does not object to the said prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner. In the circumstances, the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed. The date mentioned in the 11th line on page 12 be read as 30.5.1977 and in the description of respondent no. 7 in the cause title in respect of KSDU, Darbhanga, it should be read as KSDSU, Darbhanga. The judgment dated 7.11.2009 shall be treated as modified accordingly to that extent. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)