—- Singls Bench Cl) 6^ o^{ ^ ^ IN THE HI6H COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR ( |^ Wi?t WRIT PETITION N0. A~7 / 200^ PETITIONER .^\..°.^ s^:^>^..- ^>^:>^ .^>"6"^"5^ ^'v^ ^ .^•••T ^^^t 4" t%^": '^•1\- RESPONDENTS b"-^ "^ ^GlS^ ^^ ^y'm^' •N f<:mt' '" ^-K^, ^ .^y/. ^^•// ^?- ,^^^v_ ^- i^ ' ^t^ --^r^^'X^'' ^Q!;r^"')ys^.^ ^w "^^ l-®^ "^'" ^Y^e^ Shyam Sai son of Shri Dhukan Sai, aged about 27 years. Occupatin agriculsturist resident of village Maini Post office Durgapara, Tah Bagicha Distt. Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS- ^ 1. Chhattisgarh State Election Commission, Raipyr (Chhattisgarh)Jh^oi^i W &c^^ 2. Election Officer Panchayat, Tah Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (CG) 3. Sub Divisional Officer, Bagicha, Tah. Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) 4. Returning Officer, Gram Panchayat Maini, Tah. Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur. 5. Sukhdep Sai, son of Shri Rohidas Sai, aged about 42 years, occupation agriculturist, Resident of village Maini, PO Durgapara, Tah. Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) c^ WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT. ORDERS OR DIRECTION. •l(Z- XI-HC—78 ^T^T^Tt^W ^^T 3TJ^T '^TH^' \^ TSf-:?ITqi^T, '^tiWTS', [®(<ril^li,< ...rf...........B^..c£ "^ro?rr^ni^""""""""""""""-''"/"""""""""^ 200 3^T^^('rt^^) T'RHW^f^T en^ 12.01.200S Sliri Rajeev Shrivastavaj SlmV.V.S. Miirthv, Heard both the couiiselj Leanied Dy. Advocax^ piielmiinaiy objection filed Santosh Gupta Vs, State of| record of this niattcr aiid He mrtlier submits tliat pctition is raising m this casej The petitiotier has pr^ 226 f 227 ofthe Constitution aixd corrcctness of thc ordcr Retuinmg Ofiicer, wherebyj iiommation foi-m oftlie petiti^ Panch froin Grain. Paiichayatj order dated 28.12.2004 pass^ Case N0.03-A-68/2004-05 encroached upon tfae govei'nis| In tliis connectioii thd 36(l)(q) of C.G. Pajachayat envisages that uo person Paachayat who; (q) has Paiichavat or Goveniment. Penisal of the oixier ^S^a coniplaiiit iHadebythej sovei'nislent w?rf^pft;T "^roff ^j^^ '^^K '^"-3^H3?r^r couiisel for the petitioner. Advocate General for the State. Deibutv Genjeral submits thst copy of the |in writ petition No, 18/2004 beU^een jC.G, & others has been placed on tlie pr^yed that saoie inay be taken on record. objection regai'dmg mamtamability of this ;ien^d this writ petition under Article >flndia questioniag the legality, propriety 4iiii^xurc P-4 passed by respoiident No,4- Rctunimg Officer has rejected tlie |ner to contest the electiou for tlie post of Maini on the ground fhat io. view of the ?d by the Tehsildar, Bageecha ia Revenue |\nnexure P-5) that flie petitioner has laiid. relevaat amended provision of Sectiou Raj (Saiishodhaii) Adhiriiyam, 2004 be eligible to be aa office bearer of the upon any land and biiildings of sh4ll encibached ofl Tehsildar dated 28.12.2004 reveals fhat IPabTaii, P.C. No.20 Tehsil Bageecha the XI-HG—78 ^?r^T ^FT f^n^ ^^ ^TT^T^HT^" .'^ Rosharl ^) -^^r "^TqT^zi^ ^tTs^^^ f^RTray ^S^P^IT '^'(TW"""""""^:^"""""""""""""""^ 200 3TT^T TI^^ (^3^T) '^ITW^rfi^ 371^1 upojji Telisildar uiitiated a rcvenue tliat he has encroached Nos. 1227/1 & 1248 Maini aiid based cn ttiat a| petitioiier to file his reply. It is uot a case where totallv uon-existent or irrelei clausc fq) of sub-sectioii (1) ofj tliat aiiy person who has Paiichayat or Goverament provisions. Thereforc, fhe where tlie qiiestion of fact tavolved, the only reincdy av^ petition aiid he is not entiU^' process by filing petitiou und{ ludia, In view of tlie above. it^ is dismissed at the admissioi^ UberUr to avail the alteinative ctase again.st tlie petitioner tiereta aUegiiig the Goveniment laiid bearing Khasra admeas|Liring 0.405 & 0.202 situated at Vfflage show cause notice was issued to the \^'^ ^1<l?<n<fl'i 'HTR^ff ^ J^^t TfW^TT ^r^tRmw^r tljie noxmnation form has beeu rejected on |/raat ground, The above provision of ISection 36 offhc Adhmiyam sunply says encilaached upon the lasid or buildings oftlie jls sufficieiit for attractmg flie above f^ctual positibn aiises ui fhis case aiid j^r inixed question of facts mid law is av^ilable to the petitioner is to file election id to seek mterference witii tlie election br Article 226/227 ofthe C/onstitution of petition is Uable to be disxnissed aad it stage itself. However, the petitioner is at fe-emedv available to htm under tlie law. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge