IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39013 of 2010 MUNNA SINGH @ MUNNA THAKUR, son of Chanddrama Singh, resident of village- Jama P.S. Jamo Bazar, District- Siwan. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 19.11.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner in custody in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No.119 of 2008 for the offence punishable under Sections 364, 395, 412,328,120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The petitioner has been charged of being a party to the highway robbery and the kidnapping of the informant only to be apprehended in the process by the police whereupon two of the accused persons were arrested namely, Binod Mahto and Gautam Kumar along with the victims. The petitioner is said to have escaped from the place. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of this petitioner has transpired by reason of the statement of co-accused and that several other co-accused namely, Sanjay Poddar, Praveen Mahto, Gautam Kumar, Rohit 2 Sharma, Dipak Ghosh, Anil Singh, Binod Mahto @ Binod Kumar and Chotu Sao have been granted bail by this Court. Taking into consideration the circumstances and considering the submissions of the learned counsel, let the petitioner Munna Singh @ Munna Thakur be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No.119 of 2008 subject to the following conditions:- 1. that the father of the petitioner would stand as one of the bailors and who would be under a duty to inform the court below in case this petitioner after his release in the present case is named or is found involved in any further case of similar nature and whereupon the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and take him into custody on grounds of misuse. 2. that the petitioner would co-operate in the trial and would not try to delay the same in any manner and would also ensure 3 his representation before the Court below on each and very date fixed in the case and the failure on the part of the petitioner to ensure his representation on two consecutive dates fixed without reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the court below, would confer liberty on the Court concerned to initiate proceeding for cancellation of his bail bonds and to take him into custody. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J.)