COURT OF CHHATTI8G.ARH AT BILA8FUR PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS WRiT PETITION (S) No. 1448 of20^ Shri Sewa Ram Singti., Noii-mediaal Assistart, S/o Dfaaranijeet Sm^i, ag^d afeo'at •55"V€ar, R/o Baigakapa, Post. Lormi, DiBtrict Bilaspiir (C,CT.) 'VERSUS : !.„ T(he State ofk CMiattisgarh., through. its Secretafy, Depaita:ieB:t of Family Welfai'e, D.K.S. Bhawai'4 Raipur (C.G.) 2. Joitii Direcfcor of Heattli Servic^ of Bilaspar Division, Bilaspw (C.G,.) 3. Block Medical Oflleer, C.H.C. Lomii, Dtoict Bllaspur(C.G.) WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrrm'ION OF JNDIA SB; 13oii»Me,S}nlSatIshK^AgiiflioM,_J, Preseixt: Shri Vivek Verma, Advocate for the petitioiier. -Sliri Satish Gupta, Govermiieat Advosate forthe State / respondeiits. ORALOMDER (Passed on 04& day of March, 2008) 1., Leamed coiinsel appearmg for the petitioner avbmits th.at the issiie of of Kram<Mmati after completioii of 12/24 years ii eo loiiger r^^ mtcgra as HoB'ble ftie Siipreme Court m tti^ matter ofStote qf'Tripum and oth^s'V^ K.K.Roy (2004 8CW. 1) and this Court in the matter ofR.S.Verma Vs.State ofChhatfisgarh and others (W.P. No. 2805/2002) decided oa 29.08.2006, hm?e settl.ed fhe qyestion of law. In light of tiw abov^ decisions, the petitioiier permission of this Court to withdraw'fhis petitioii wi& liberty to make a detailed represeiitation to the concer.iied aiifliorities^. to whi.ch leamed couBsel appearicg for fh.e respondexrts/State haf rso objectioB. 2. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed with llie albresaid liberty. In tfae event, thc representation is made to ;tfae con^em©dauttiwities. fh.e shall be coiisidered m -accordance with- law on ite <?w!i'merit as expeditiQasly as possible, preferably withm a period ofeight w@dc;,s» Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ATDlt