IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1075 (M/S)/2005 Smt. Anadi Bijalwan W/o Shri Heera Lal R/o 637, Awas Vikas Colony, Veer Bhadra Road, Rishikesh, District Dehradun. …….Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Director General of Police, Head Quarter, Dehradun. 2. Superintendent of Police, District Hardwar. 3. Sub Inspector Heera Lal (37), presently posted in Horse Battalion District Dehradun. …… Respondents 24.04.2006 Sri H.M. Raturi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.1,2 & 3. Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Sri H.M. Raturi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No. 1, 2 & 3. By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to incorporate the name of the petitioner in place of nominee in the service book of the petitioner’s husband. Briefly stated according the case of the petitioner, her marriage was solemnized according to Hindu Rights and Rituals with respondent No.3 in the year 1986 but till date her name has not been incorporated in the service record of respondent No.3 in place of nominee. She has further submitted that after the solemnization of the marriage between her and respondent no.3, respondent no.2 has made relations with one Smt. Kamla Gusain whose name has also been incorporated in place of his wife in his service book. The husband of the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 24.11.2001 before the Superintendent of Police, Tehri Garhwal for incorporating the name of the petitioner as his nominee in his service book but the same has not been considered till now. The petitioner has made several requests to the respondent no.1 & 2 for incorporating the name of his wife in the service book of respondent no.3. In View of the above, the respondents No. 1 & 2 are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Subject to the aforesaid observations, writ petition is disposed of. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) 24.04.2006 Jain