1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Criminal Application No.1236 of 2008 In Cri.Appeal St.No.256/2008. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _______________________|_______________________________________ 1. Heard Mr. K.S. Patil, learned A.P.P. 2. The State has come up in appeal against judgment of acquittal in a Criminal Case bearing No.RCC No.192/1998, wherein the Respondent was tried for sale of adulterated ice candy. The learned Judicial Magistrate, held that Rules 14 and 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 have been breached. It appears from the impugned judgment that violation of Rule 14 is inferred because the Food Inspector did not specifically state that the ice candy was separated from the wooden stick while preparing the sample packet. Considering the nature of reasons ascribed, leave to appeal is granted. 3. Admit. 4. Call R & P. 5. Print dispensed with. 6. Action U/s 390 of the Cr.P.C. 7. S.O. to 12.10.2009. (V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) Dt.05.09.2009. asp/office/Crapp1236.08