^»J»^.^^.»^ J} w HtGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BtLASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 424 of 2008 Petitioner Versus Respondents 1. 2. Girdhar Singh Verma, S/o Shri Hemu Singh Verma, Age about 52 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Raudra, Block - Saza, Distt.- Durg (C.G.) State Govemment of Chhattisgarh, Through :- Secretary. Education and Tribal Department. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Bemetara. Distt. - Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITOIN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Singte Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondente. Thakur ORALORDER (Passed on this 22nd day of January, 2008) The petitioner was appojnted on 30.6.1980, jnitiajly. on a fb<ed pay of Rs. 150/-. The petitioner was thereafter, granted regular pay scaie on completion ofthe probatlon period. The question of <aw involved herein is. asto whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probafion period. Learned counselappearing for the petitioner as well as leamed counsel appearing for the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts and question of !aw, involved in the pr^sent writ petjtion, are the same asto that of in W.P.(S) No. 58/2007 (Paras Nath Gupta Vs. SSate of Chhaffisgarh & others), which was allowed vide order dated 15.1 .2007. In view of the above-stated submsssions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petitlon is allowed In the same terms, subject to verification of facts . No order asto costs. ____- Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge