^ ^ H!GH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BiLASPUR innni Dii-nor WriS Petition (S} No. 3664 of 2008 Petitioner Bharat Lal Jagat, aged about 32 yeare, Son of Shri Sadhu Ram Jagat, Residsnt of Vi!!ags Chiprikona, Post Bhawarpur, Tahsil Basna, Districi Mahasamund, presently reslding at C/o Cttt-i RjSi*tnl..^?*K Q^^ l/ill<3d-3jft ^*n<d D^v-t' vfiifi iViiyiiS'<3)i <i3aV, viilayc dliU )-v??i. Bansula, Tahsil Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.) \f^\rf*i t^ V^ii?Ui> D •>?il!'*F»/^»» rf4/»»»1 f^isS?ji/vi iMs?i lti» A 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Local Self ahd Urban Administratson Department, D.K.5. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Nagar Panchayat Basna, Through: The President, Nagar Panchayat, Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 3. The Chief Munteipa! Cfflcer, Nagar Panchayat, Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 4. Mahendra Kumar Bhoi Son of Shri Raghunath Bhoi, Resident of Village Jakai'beda, Post Taresingha, Tahsil SaraipsH, District Mahasamund, (C.G.), presentiy postod at Govt. Giris Higher Secondary School, Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.). WR!T PETiTOIN UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTiTUTION OF JNDiA Single Bench : Hon'bls fvlr. Sats'sh K. AgRihofri, J. Shri P. P. Sahu, AdvocaSe forfhe petitionsr. ShriS ^. t^ hfl*<»frt!r-'s D/^»»^lf ^»*ft»//^f•?^f (+»,ini F^^^*<L^%yt.,n!^i»>t^M.n 4 w. !\. iviiSsiilGi, i—aii^?ii-ciwy^i jvt litik? ii^&pViiu^iil i'sV. i. Q.^fl flSftn/\' ?3/sr^i»i»ins & f^\ff>f*-Mt^^ f/^F t^a f^^f*/\y*f^&y\'^ hJ/^ ^ ^a?'?^ ^ djii IVJtiilUj r'oieaiijpe, M'u'Vwals; jyi liiii; i ^i^l./Vi i^it.?i ili? iSv, ^ fiii^ ^f. M< None fifor frse respondent No.4. 1. ORALORDER (Passed on this 10 day of January, 2008) "TE^Ii^ tf^ <"i w^'^M'^tf tB/tft/M'/t ^>'4'/s+ti+.^n'/ ^i»flt*^^"»^a!se* -^i//til^»|i^l,a i *»»/<!/M'Olt!^ '11 /^^'frl^/'i i iiii? iS» u iiiai.i,<?j Wi i^ ^laiUiyiy npp^tti ii? civcaitni^i^? UiiU^i r^Ui^ t£.Vl y i<5 R8f^^4ii^\i-^t Di"'»>nt/^^»t» M/^/q-^F t3<^lil/^t CtiElrfv*!^'^ V^^rw*i /OlTi^t^i T/ttt^-n O^s iViciUliyd r'Tny^^Ti i^iAycii )-ciiii\ci Oiiii\^nci rstfiliii ^OIi^iU is.iUiR Shirte) Niyam, 1998. Learned counsel appearing for the respondente submitthatthe petiiioner has concealed this factv/hite filing the petition. • S^Ssii^S^^S^SSSeSS^S^W^f^^^^S ^' 2. 3. 4^.: -'z.- !n view of the avaiiability of the effectiye, efficadous and statutory' alternative remedy, this petition is not maintainabis and it Is dismissed, accordingiy. Ho'w'sver, iiberty is rssewed to the petitionsr to teke recourse to the alSemative sSatutory forum. that may be avatiabie to him, ifsoadvised. The Sime spent in ttiis Court shal! be counted for the purpose of Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge condonaSon of deiay in fiiing appea!.