IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47887 of 2008 1. NANHE SINGH 2. BHOOLAN SINGH @ BHOOLAN KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02.12.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a Police case under Sections 307 and other provisions of the Penal Code. The submission is that five of the named co-accused have been enlarged on anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. No. 19139 and Cr. Misc. No. 19140 of 2008 noticing inter alia that there has been no injury to any one. The allegation is common vis-à-vis the petitioners also. The F.I.R. alleges indiscriminate firing to terrorize. The impugned order of rejection notices from paragraph 4 of the case diary that the I.O. visiting the place of occurrence found signs of use of fire-arm on the wall of the informant. This aspect does not appear to have been brought to the court granting anticipatory bail to the co-accused. That distinguishes the case. The application for anticipatory bail is rejected. Any application for regular bail shall be considered on its own merits without being prejudiced by the present order and the factum of anticipatory bail to co-accused when materials were not properly placed before the Court. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)