IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.27030 -M of 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : SEPTEMBER 12, 2011 PARAMJOT KAUR & ANR. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS U.T. CHANDIGARH & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Vikas Mor, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Ramneek Vasudeva, Advocate, for respondents 3 & 4. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) The petitioners have approached this court with a plea that they got married, however, against the desires of respondents No.3 and 4, who are father and mother of petitioner No.1 and, therefore, are being threatened. Learned counsel for respondents No.3 and 4 has pointed out that respondents No.3 and 4 are aged persons and at no point in time did they threaten the petitioners. Rather, the family circumstances are demanding and they are only worried about the welfare of their daughter. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for respondents No.3 and 4, no ground for issuance of any direction is made out. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. September 12, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE