1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12959 of 2011 1.THAVAMANI 2.MAHAMUNI 3.THANGAPANDI 4.DHANAPAL ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 to 4 Vs STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLCIE JAYAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT CR.NO. 154/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate For Respondent : MR. A. RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as A1 to A4 and they were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.09.2011 for the alleged offence punishable under Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.154 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that they have nothing to do with the alleged commission of offence and the petitioners are in custody from 13.09.2011 and hence, he prays for enlargement on bail. 3. Refuting the same, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that because of the Paramakudi incidence, the occurrence has been taken place on 13.09.2011. He further submitted that when the defacto complainant driving the vehicle, the petitioners have pelted the stone towards on the bus, thereby, the front and side mirror was damaged and the value of the damage is worth about Rs.9,000/- (Rupees Nine Thousand only). He further submitted that the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that because of the Paramakudi incidence on 11.09.2011, the occurrence has been taken place on 13.09.2011 and the alleged nature of the offence, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, subject to the following stringent conditions:- (i) Each of the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.9,000/- (Rupees Nine Thousand) to the credit of Crime No.154 of 2011 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Periyakulam; ii) On such deposits the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Periyakulam; and iii) The petitioners shall report before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Periyakulam, daily at 10.30. a.m. until further orders. sd/- 28/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PERIYAKULAM 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI 3 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, SUB JAIL, PERIYAKULAM 4 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, JAYAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT 5 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate SR.No.33769 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12959 of 2011 Date :28/09/2011 TR : 29.09.2011: 2p/7c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/