: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVSION APPLICATION NO.1 OF 2010 M/s.Shah Trading Co. & Anr. ... Applicants V/s. Kapol Co-op. Bank Ltd. ... Respondent Mr.P.S. Dani a/w for Applicant Mr.S.M. Vyas for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: JANUARY 22, 2010 P.C.: 1. The civil revision application has been filed by the applicants who are the defendants before the trial Court. Both the Courts below have concurrently held that the applicant No.1 had sublet the premises to applicant No.2 and, therefore, had passed the decree for eviction. Evidence recorded by the trial Court indicates that the applicant No.1 was a proprietary concern of Pravinchandra Shah. Applicant No.2 was inducted as a partner in the business and the business of the firm. Thereafter Pravinchandra Shah retired from the partnership concern. Applicant No.2 continued the business for two months as a proprietor of applicant No.1. Thereafter, he started his own business in the name and style of S.A. Power Centre. 2. Both the Courts below have found that it was more than clear that defendant : 2 : No.1 i.e., the proprietor of applicant No.1 had parted with the possession of the suit premises by putting applicant No.2 in exclusive possession. Both the Courts have found that applicant No.1 was paid consideration for a change of tenancy and therefore it has been held that Applicant No.1 had sublet the suit premises to applicant No.2. In my view, no interference is called for. 3. Civil revision application is dismissed. 4. On the application made by the learned advocate for the applicants, the decree will not be executed for a period of eight weeks from today on the usual undertaking being furnished to this Court within two weeks by the applicant and all adults in the family of applicant No.2.