k $§§€1HCQURT 3F €33ATT§§§AR¥¥ AT RELAgEEUR “‘7 “4" i’ii. l. ‘3 1'€§ti0i1 L l 3 f"\ 5g “Y Ha} 07v El’n/ {u P& gaUo “f, Kasaru Vijay Knmar Assistant Kager Taa’tcher aged F;imaw whmnf (1" Igchogi“ yew, Bhiiai q/n Qlm Khurd Ralmm N0. PFT‘ITH‘ENEE i; E‘Qst Gffice h/Eankpiir Caiary. Bioek Karba, District Km‘ba (CG). VER§U§ : 1. State 0f Chlmttisgarh T§Eoizgh Sacretary, Schoai Educa‘iimi Dapar‘xmmi DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2K The Direé‘mr ‘Pubiic Ingfmctian Depamnem Raipur (CG). 3 4. Biock Education Oifwar Korba. District Korba. (CG). RIT PEHTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 9F THE CGNS ITUTION OF {NDIA} (SE: H€iif§¥n§e Mr. §afjsh K. Agigihiwri: S.) Prawn? Assisstant. Commissianer Tribal 8: Weifare Deparnncsnt Kerba (CG). Siiri Kumil DaS, Advocats for tbs petitioner. Shri UNE: D60, GQVL Advocait: for ihs Siate/responden’is. ORAL QRJWJR .1,__ (Fasseu‘i mi 23m (ji' Feutuiziry, 2.53%) Jm patitimer was initially appointec! cw AssiStaii Teachar 0:1 Exed pay 6f Rs. 300t‘-. rim-r completiog of probatimw the petiiionar was gmnted reguiar pay Scakz. Shnilariy siumied emplavees had appmachsdvthe. Madhya Pg‘aéesh State Ad111§11isimiiva Tribunal, Jabalfjur. Tha Triblmal pasged the ortier on 3%.{331992 iii QA. N0. 274$!89 (Macajjkani Yadu $111.1 56 otherS Vs. Staie 0f MP. &. Gihers.) hf wag iiuihar haid that tha said benefit Wimid ha giverl to all the washers zalid ‘d ,y Should iic)‘: {hi Ltdinpellgd i0 appi‘oax3h €1.16 rfribunai _or similar Er :1 v; wait i113siViéuziily or mlisetivehf. weing aggrieved; wipe man State of Madhya Fraéegh had mad ill, Spagial Leame Petiiian (Civii) No. 6892/93 i111pug1§ug iim 0rder dated 24.G8.1992 pagsed by tha Madhya Pradash Ai§LinisimtiV6 Tribunal, Jai‘ifilgwr in GA Na. 2?45/89. The Hm’hla Snpreme Calm afigr hearing C(Jiingei for this gvartiss, dismisssd ihé Spacial have 13:3iiiion agd having zegaxd to the Earga fmaacial implicaiicm gramfad 0n. yaar’g iima to settig {Lg claim. fer ihe. arrears w£thn3ut mterest Ma‘s arder dated 33.81.199‘4. it was iiirther observaad that the iniervemim would waria: out fileii: righw in accardaime with iaw. ThiS arder datsd 24.08.1992 4 -A‘“ . v7 3““?”” ’ L *mswd hv fhe Tribunal m l. .. .A Nu 2745/1989 is appligable to the patitimmrs bging similariy situated and they are macrdingiy entitled to the samg bemflt Leamed comma! appeannv For th tmner qubmnfg fhat tins Calif Kumqr ‘ .111 and others VS. Staie GQVL afChliattiSgarh and another €11 Writ 13etitim1. (51) N0) 813 of ”0H7 hv mder timed 12 O2 007) has gran (hf? OF 121mg} gn‘wnmfmem .._ If ‘ .ring far the pzriwt: mm‘rly gubnn .331 ilm vase :g L. wedwmigae} r 11 91v mVr‘rPd bV fha drCiSim: ofihia {‘Nlrt m 1 age Wf R v 191mm Mini and ethaix JQ Sate Gov OF Chhmmgmh and 4110mm (Supm) “0" P .he stata iS at uberty to vefify tha fams of appointmeni asto whatlmr the (5.8.36 of tha petitioner is similar to that of thse 0rd§r dated 12.G2.2007 pagssd by this caurt in WP. (S) No. 813 (£2067 (Supra). in viaw ofthai 111k: p~3iitiim is aliowed £11 the same farms £33. pefitioner is :entitigxd t0 ihs sap: Jaliaf as wa¢ grw 4 5y file Madhvg ‘r‘ a5e<h Qfate “bum! hbainur n “A 3 C‘74WRQ (Madhukani ‘fadu and $6 Oihnars Vg. State of M‘P r‘3I ronf z: d. by orrkr dmed 0? m M new y (“mm‘ 1L Qpgmai Eeava Pefn‘inn s” hm. Na, 6397/92 Tim paiiimmr ghaH be gown ¥“ orderQ mm u EV} n1 minial m: weh a? by fhs [JI wliie. comiéeriag the. sama igsue iL R ed reguEar pay scale w‘ef. the, a V ,WV ,.. AdminiStratiVP 14$) 3.113. I-Remzenfw .a hm‘me Suprema Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri’ Judge