IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4920 of 2010 INDESHWARI PRASAD YADAV SON OF LATE BHUJANGI PRASAD YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KOLHAYPATTI, P.O. RAGHUNATHPUR, P.S. MURLIGANJ, DISTRICT MADHEPURA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. ENGINEER IN CHIEFCUM SPECIAL SECRETARY, PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, PATNA. 4. CHIEF ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING BHAGALPUR ZONE, BHAGALPUR. 5. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING CIRCLE SAHARSA. 6. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION, KHAGARIA. 7. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION, SAHARSA. 8. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL OF BIHAR, PATNA. 9. DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, MADHEPURA, DISTRICT MADHEPURA. ----------- 02. 22.03.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State as also the respondent – Accountant General The grievance of the petitioner is that petitioner superannuated on 31st of July 2004 from the post of Work Sarkar under the respondent no. 6. However, the arrears of pension for the period 01.08.2004 to 03.04.2007 amounting to Rs. 1,59,264/- has not been paid as yet on account of awaiting the sanction order of the respondent no. 6 as sought for by the office of the Accountant General as per letter contained in Memo No. PEN 3-271680 dated 23rd of November 2007 as contained in Annexure-3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent – State submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 6 with a copy to respondent nos. 8 and 9. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest if permissibly under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)