In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh C.W.P. No. 12773 of 2008 Date of Decision: August 28, 2009 Navdeep Singh Dhaliwal and others. …. Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others. … Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice J.S. Khehar, Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.D. Anand. Present : Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Rita Kohli, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent No.1. Mr. Pardeep Bajaj, Advocate, for Mr. Rupinder Kholsa, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 and 3. J.S. Khehar, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for respondent No.1, in view of the factual position noticed in the written statement, states that the State Government has taken a conscious decision not to acquire the land in furtherance of the impugned notification dated 19.05.2008 (published in the Tribune dated 28.05.2008). Learned counsel for the respondents accordingly states, that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for respondent No.1, the instant writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. ( J.S. Khehar ) Judge August 28, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge