‘t‘i RESPONDNETS H" smmEgEg‘mH ~ (D gafsCaL S’ Khoobchand Manjhi, S/o Sri Baldev Singh Manjhi, Aged about 36 years, R/O village—Muchaihal, Block Mainpur,‘ District-Raipur (C.G.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. PRS . ETITIONE Mahavir Chakrawarti,S/o Shri Manaram Chakrawarti Aged about 24 years Resident of Village Bazadi Block Mainpur, Tensile Garcia Band, District Raipur Chattisgarh Bharatlal Bhaati,S/o Shri Lal Bhaati Aged about 26 years Resident of 'Vill—' Gudvelly, Block Mainpur, Tehsil Gariya Band, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS ' Union of India, Through Secretary, Ministry of Education, New Delhi. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department The Director, Directorate of Public Instructions, D. K. S. Bhawan Raipur, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION (5) Moézzz [2006 1. 1 f of School Education, Mantralaya D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) @ @ The Director, State Educational Research and Training Centre, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. w The Collector, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. The Mission Director, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, State Project Office Raipur, Chhattisgarh . The President, Janpad Panchayat, Block Mainpur, District— Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Block Mainpur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. g t , The Block Education Officer District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. District Project Co—Ordinator, (Samanvayak), Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. Block Resources Co—Ordinator, (Samanvayak), Rajiv Gandhi Shiksh Mission, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 11. a \ + @ \ ¥ ;‘/,\ @/ WRIT PETI'IION UNDER AR‘IICLE 226 227 OF THE SGNSWUHGN 6F iNBiA. XI—HC—22 3am, mgmgt w.?...L.J.> ¥x ‘?\ 13/ m " WI 2 WWW 13.11.2006 - 5hri Aiok Nigum, counsel for The pefifioner‘s. 5m? Anju Ahuja, DyGA fo~ me respondenfs / 3mm. Heard. Leawned ¢ounsel fm" Tha [:efi’fioner‘s submi’rs fhm‘ wifhouf making any Subsmmia! represenmfian beforel The compefanf aufhor'ify, They appmachzad This Ccur‘r direcfly; Therefar‘e, fh ay pray far wi’fhdmwal of This wri’r paTi‘i’ian wiTh iiberTy To fiie represan’raTion raising aii Their grievancas before The compeTenT auThor‘iTy and Therm’f’rer if exigency arises, To Tiia fresh peTiTion. NQT opposed. Cansidered. PeTiTioners may fiie Their dafailed represenmTian aiong wiTh capy’ of Thi$ peTiTion bafore The compeTenT auThoriTy wiThin ci period of we monTh from Today and in Turn, Th3 auThc‘riTy Sim” decide ThaT represenTaTian in an abjecfive manner wiThin c: period of one monTh fr‘om The da‘ia of raceip‘r of reprasen‘i‘a‘iian, If any exigency nriseg: peTiTioner's are aT iiberTy To remew Thair wriT peTiTicn. WiTh The aforesaid direc’rium The peTiTian sTand5 disposed of. Accordingly, M.(W.)P.No.3808/20Q6 sTands disposed of. Sd/- L V.K.Shrivastava I)‘ Judge padma (cna W) my 96wWM9WW“