IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 618 of 2005 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- KHUMANSIGH DABHSIGH CHAUHAN Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Criminal Application No. 618 of 2005 MR SM CHUDASAMA for Petitioner No. 1 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent No. 1 .......... for Respondent No. 2-3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA Date of decision: 11/05/2005 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and Ms.H.B.Punani for the respondents. Ms.Punani has placed on record jail remarks of the convict prisoner and accordingly many times the petitioner has been released on parole and on temporary bail and no untowards incident is reported. 2. This application is preferred by the convict prisoner making grievance that he preferred a parole application to the Competent Authority on 5th of April, 2005, but till the date the said application remains undecided. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is disposed of with direction to the District Magistrate, Baroda, a Competent Authority, to decide parole application preferred by the petitioner on 5th of April, 2005, within 15 days from the date of the receipt of the writ of this Court. 4. The Competent Authority shall take into consideration the jail remarks and jail conduct of the petitioner and decide the said parole application. Rule made absolute to the aforesaid extent. ( J.R.VORA,J.) 11.05.2005 amit