IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 4805 of 2008. Decided on: 06.09.2010. __________________________________________________________ Nihal Singh. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since her client has expired, the present petition has become infructuous. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 06, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?