IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 22ND FEBRUARY 2010 / 3RD PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 5101 of 2010(K) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- R.RAJAN, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O. RAMASWAMY, KALLARAKUNNU VILLA, VEERALAM, ATTINGAL. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.P.P.BIJU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE MANAGER, (MARKETING), THIRUVANANTHAPOURAM REGIONAL CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD., KOLLAM DIARY, THEVALLY, KOLLAM. 2. MILMA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. SRI.B.S.KRISHNAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 5101 of 2010 K ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 22nd day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is conducting an agency of the respondents(Milma) in a room adjacent to his residential house at Veeralam. He is running the agency since 16-05-2008, which is evident from Ext.P1. 2. The Milma booth of the petitioner is situated on the side of Veeralam - Pochamkulam road, which is maintained by Attingal Municipality. 3. The second respondent is supplying goods to the petitioner by engaging transporting contractors. From January 2010 onwards, the contractor has changed the vehicle. According to the petitioner, he was supplied goods upto 06-02-2010 and thereafter, stating various difficulties the contractor stopped the supply of goods. Ext.P2 is a letter issued by the second respondent informing him about the various difficulties. 4. Eventhough the petitioner had filed a complaint in the matter, since no action has been taken as requested for by him in WPC.5101/2010 : 2 : the matter in the light of the facts revealed from Ext.P2 itself. 5. Heard learned standing counsel for the respondent, who submitted that no action can be taken against the second respondent by the first respondent in the matter. 6. What is pointed out as dispute is only regarding supply of goods to the shop being conducted by the petitioner. It is a matter which the petitioner can raise before the Department itself. 7. If the petitioner approaches the concerned Department by way of a representation, the same will be considered expeditiously and appropriate decision will be taken thereon, after notice to the first respondent also. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge