13. appa 456-11.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. APPLICATION NO. 456 OF 2011 IN CRI. APPLICATION NO. 1073 OF 2008 IN CRI. APPEAL NO. 4 OF 2008 Rajkumar Haibat Jadhav .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. Niranjan Mundargi i/b M/s. Haresh Mehta for the Applicant Ms. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the State CORAM : P.V. HARDAS & M.N. GILANI, JJ. DATE : 15th APRIL, 2011. PER COURT: 1. By this application, the applicant / appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 4 of 2008 seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him by this Court by its order dated 24th November 2008 in Criminal Application No. 1073 of 2008, by which the applicant was directed not to stay at Mahad Taluka. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant has invited our attention to the order passed by this Court dated 24th March 2011 in Criminal Application No. 162 of 2011 by which similar condition was imposed on the co-accused Umesh Anna Jadhav who came 1 13. appa 456-11.doc to be released. The Division Bench found that the applicant therein was an agriculturist possessing agricultural land at Mahad and his family members were also residing there. In the present application, it is averred by the applicant that the applicant is also an agriculturist and his family members are residing at Mahad Taluka. It is further stated that on account of the fact that the applicant is required to reside away from Mahad, his family members are not able to earn their livelihood. 3. In the light of the fact that similar condition had been relaxed by the Division Bench vide its order dated 24th March, 2011 in Criminal Application No. 162 of 2011, we allow the present application and permit the applicant to reside in Mahad Taluka on condition that he shall report to Mahad Taluka Police Station on every Monday between 11.00 a.m. to 02.00 p.m. in order to mark his presence. 4. Application allowed as indicated above. [ M.N. GILANI, J ] [ P.V. HARDAS, J ] 2 13. appa 456-11.doc 3