IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 2ND FEBRUARY 2009 / 13TH MAGHA 1930 OP.No. 22124 of 2001(H) ----------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.V.BAIJU, THOTTAPPATTU HOUSE, PULLUVAZHI P.O., RAYAMANGALAM. BY ADV. SRI.N.SUKUMARAN SRI.S.SHYAM SRI.N.K.KARNIS SRI.LELLULAL T.G.THUNDATHIL SRI.BOBBYMATHEW KOOTHATTUKULAM SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MOOVATTUPUZHA. 2.VILLAGE OFFICER, VENGOLA VILLAGE, PULLUVAZHI P.O., KUNNATHUNAD TALUK. 3.STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LATHA THANKAPPAN. THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON C.M.P.NO.36124/01 IN O.P.NO.22124/01 CLOSED 2.2.2009. SD/- KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED 7.11.1998 IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RAYAMANGALAM PANCHAYAT DT. 25.8.1997. EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE RAYAMANGALAM PANCHAYAT DT. 17.3.1998. EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY OF RAYAMANGALAM PANCHAYAT BEARING NO.C/136/94 DT. 31.8.2000. EXT.P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE LICENCE ISSUED BY THE RAYAMANGALAM PANCHAYATH BEARING NO.112/2000 DT. 7.8.2000. EXT.P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE LICENCE ISSUED BY THE RAYAMANGALAM PANCHAYATH BEARING NO.102/2001 /2002 DT. 2.7.2001. EXT.P7 : TRUE COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER'S FATHER DT. 23.1.2001 BEARING NO.216/2001. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- O.P. No.22124 of 2001 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 2nd February, 2009. J U D G M E N T Petitioner approached this court aggrieved by Ext.P9 memo. On 27.7.2001, this court issued the following interim order :- “There shall be an interim stay of Ext.P9 for one month. This stay shall not stand in the way of the concerned authority taking appropriate action against the petitioner or anyone else by issuing notice, in accordance with the Kerala Land Utilization Order. If the petitioner thus have the necessary licences and no objection certificates, the respondents shall not prevent the conduct of the rice mill owned by the petitioner.” The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the said interim order. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH, J ---------------------------------------------- O.P. No.22124 of 2001 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 2nd February, 2009.