^iy^,p^ ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT QF CHHATISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l WRIT PETITION (Sl N0. '97^/ OF 2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^^9_ ^,€^ c^..'-""'..<^ ^" ^' 1. / ^" 3. Ghanshyam Patel S/o Rohit Kumar Patel, aged about 30 years, R/o Viltage- Tapranga, PO- Dhourabahata Tahsil- Ghargodha, Distt-Raigargh(CG) Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, General Administration Department D.K.S Bhavan Raipur -<CG) Collector Raigarh Dist- Raigargh(CG) Sub Divisional Officer Gharaghoda, Distt-Raigargh (CG) Jindal Steel and Power Limited Through Managing Director P.B.No 16, Kharsia Road, Raigarh (CG). ^.-- 5. Jindal Coat Mines Through Manager Jindal Coal Mines Dounga Moha, Gharaghoda, Distt- Raigarh (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON^BLE MR. JUSTXC®PRXTIMKBR W.P.fSl.NO. 7751/2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTs Versus Ghaiishvain Patel State of Chhattisgarh 85 Others Shri K,K.Paudey, counsel for tlie petitioner. Shri N.Naha Roy, P.L. for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IHDIA ORDER 116.12.2011) Counsel for the petitioner submits that purpose of filing this petition would be served tfthe petitioner is pei'mitted to withdraw tliis pctition with libext};r to approach the respondent N0.4 along with copy ofletter dated 4.8.2011 (Aniiexure P/ 10) issued by tlie Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) G-harghoda, Raigarh. Accordmgly, ihe petitioDer is perxnitted to wifhdraw tliis petition. Needless to state tliat in tlie eventuality of lillog aiiy representatioD/appIication by the petitioner, fhe same would be dealt with by the competent aufhority m accordauce with law as expeditioiisly as possible. It is inade clear that this court has not expressed any opiaioii on tlie nierits of tiie case aud tlie aiitliority concenied would be at liberty to decide fhe representation/application stncUy ni accordance with law. The petition is thus disniissed a.s withdrawn. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge