s TN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 4669 OF 2011 w PETITIONERS : 1. Praveen Kumar Sai, S/o Shri Ganesh Sai, aged about 48 years, 2. Smt. Shanti Sai, W/o Shri Praveen Kumar Sai, aged about 46 years, Both are R/o — Village, Post and Police Station- Saria, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, Nagriya Prashashan Avam Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, Raigarh, District— Raigarh (C.G.) 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer (R), Sarangarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 4. The Naib Tahsldar, Circle Saria, Tahsil- Baramkela, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 5 The Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat- Saria, District— Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITLDIRECTION The petitioners respectfully beg to submit as under:- W %‘§ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO.7069 OF 2011 (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J, Present :- Shri Roop Naik, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adv. General with Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents and respondent! Nagar Panchayat Saria. O R D E R (Passed on this 15"“ day of December, 2011) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that the respondent authorities have decided to withdraw the impugned notice dated 18-11-2011 (Annexure — P/1), as no sufficient time was given, and if necessary fresh notice shall be issued affording proper opportunity of hearing to the respective person to put forward their case‘ if any. 2. In view of the above, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Gowri PETITIONERS Praveen Kumar Sai & Another Versus RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh & Others