HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO. 6504 OF 2005 Thursday, the Seventeenth day of February, Two Thousand and Eleven Between Mittapalli Swamy and another Petitioners AND The Joint Collector, Karimnagar and others Respondents ORDER: The petitioner questions order of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapalli, Karimnagar District dated 16.9.2002 in canceling the mutation granted in favour of the petitioner irregularly, based on the simple unregistered sale deed in exercise of the powers under Sec.5-B of the Record of Rights in the Lands and Pattedar Passbooks Act, 1971. This order of the Revenue Divisional Officer dated 16.9.2002 as confirmed by the Joint Collector through orders dated 19.2.2005 and the consequential Memo issued by the Revenue Divisional Officer dated 3.3.2005, calling upon the petitioners to produce the pattedar pass book so as to enable to effect the change is assailed in this writ petition as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioners though questioned the said order during the course of arguments submits that this court while admitting the writ petition, has granted status quo obtaining as on 28.3.2005 and the said order of status quo is continuing pending disposal of the Appeal Suit Nos. 15 and 16 of 2004 on the file of the Senor Civil Judge, Peddapalli, which were filed against the orders dismissing the suits O.S. Nos. 121 and 122 of 1997 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Peddapalli. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that though the petitioners have rightly filed comprehensive suits for declaration of title as well as perpetual injunction but they have failed to establish their possession as well as title and lost the suits, it is for the petitioners to obtained appropriate orders in the pending Appeal Suit Nos. 15 and 16 of 2004. But this court cannot grant any injunction protecting the alleged possession of the petitioners. When the petitioners have failed to get perpetual or temporary injunction and also failed to establish their right and title and after losing the battle before the revenue authorities, the petitioners are not entitled for any orders of status quo pending disposal of the Appeal Suits. Accordingly, I do not see any legal infirmity in the impugned order. The petitioners have rightly chosen to file comprehensive suits before the civil court. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not see any merit in the writ petition. Consequently the writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ Justice V.Eswaraiah February 17, 2011 MAS