- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.49 OF 2008 PETITION NO.49 OF 2008 PETITION NO.49 OF 2008. Mr. Hanamant Gundappa Jadhav. ...Petitioner. v/s. The Union of India & Others. ...Respondents. .... Mr. Uday Shankar Samudrala, for the Petitioner. Mr.T.J. Pandian, for the Respondents. .... CORAM CORAM CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : NOVEMBER 20,2008 : NOVEMBER 20,2008 : NOVEMBER 20,2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents has invited my attention to a communication dated 18th February 2008 issued by the Central Railways. The said letter shows that one of the co-arbitrators Shri D.K. Gupta has been replaced by Shri P.K.Mittal. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents states that he represents the three arbitrators. On instructions, he stated that the proceedings will be concluded and an Award will be passed on or before 31st May 2009. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that he is not pressing the petition in view of the said statement. - 2 - 2. The statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents is accepted. In view of the said statement, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. [A.S.OKA,J.]