IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 7389 of 2008 Decided on: 8.12.2010 Salocho Ram …Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur …Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : None. For the respondent : Mr. Lokender Thakur, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that he should have been regularized as Wireman/Electrician, since he had been working in the respondent-University as such since 1983. Case of the respondent, in a nut-shell, is that the petitioner himself has applied for the post of Peon and subsequently, he was selected against the said post on 22.7.1994. 2. Mr. Lokender Thakur, Advocate submits that the respondent-University has adopted the guidelines framed by the State Government in the year 1995. However, the fact of the matter is that the case of the petitioner ought to have been considered for the post of Wireman/Electrician taking into consideration the experience gained by him in this trade. 3. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-University to re-consider the case of the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- petitioner, if he is still ready and willing to be regularized against the post of Wireman/Electrician instead of Peon, within a period of two months, after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge December 8, 2010 (K. Attri)