MC 2869/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE AC UPADHYAY MC 2869/2007 In MAC Appeal No. of 2007 Heard Mr. R.Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears on behalf of respondents. It appears from the office note of the Registry that notices have been duly serv ed upon the respondents No. 2 and 3 by registered post with A/D. However neither A/D cards nor unnerved notices in respect of respondents No.2 & 3 have been rec eived back. In view of the above, in terms of the provisions of Order 5 Rule 9(5) of the CPC the services of notice upon respondents No.2 & 3 are hereby deemed to be effect ed. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1973 seeking condo nation of delay of 26 days in preferring the connected appeal against the judgme nt and award dated 23.2.2007 in MAC Case No. 73 of 2005, passed by the learned M ember, Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal, Karimganj.. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the reasons for delay in f iling the appeal has been explained in paragraph-3 of the condonation applicatio n. On careful perusal of the materials on record and on due consideration of the su bmissions and the reasons explained in the application and the grounds mentione d by the petitioner, I find there is sufficient ground to condone the delay of 26 days in preferring the connected appeal. Accordingly the delay is hereby co ndoned. Misc. case is disposed of.