THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33024 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner was appointed as a Junior Assistant by the 1st respondent-private educational institution. It is stated that her services were regularized on 31.01.2001. The grievance of the petitioner is that with effect from 16.12.2010, the 1st respondent has orally terminated her services and she challenges the action of the respondents in this regard. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Education. When a doubt was expressed by this Court as to whether a writ petition can be maintained by an employee of private educational institution against the management, a judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in Dr.Ken R. Gnanakan and others vs. Anita Aidinyants[1] is cited. Though the writ petition is also maintainable against a private educational institution not admitted to grant-in-aid, the fact remains that the petitioner had an effective alternative remedy under Section 80 of the A.P. Education Act or she can also approach the Labour Court. It is only in such proceedings that the disputed questions of fact, particularly when there is no specific order of removal, can be gone into. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the remedy of appeal or of raising an industrial dispute. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 05.09.2011 JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33024 of 2010 Date: 05.09.2011 JSU [1] 2003(6) ALD 34 (DB)