IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11357 of 2007 ANITA KUMARI WIFE OF SATISH KUMAR @KUWAR. RESIDENT OF VILL.-BARHAUNA, P.S. VIDYAPATI NAGAR, DISTRICT – SAMASTIPUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, VIDYAPATINAGAR, SAMASTIPUR. 3. BLOCK DELOPMENT OFFICER,SAMASTIPUR. 4.PANCHAYAT SACHIV, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ BARHAUNA,VIDYAPATI NAGAR,SAMASTIPUR. 5. MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, BARHAUNA, SAMASTIPUR. 6. NILAM KUMARI WIFE OF SUNIL KUMAR KUWAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BARHAUNA, P.S. VIDYAPATI NAGAR, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR. 2 4.12.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows:- (A) A writ in the nature of certiorari or any other Appropriate writ/writs order/orders, direction Quashing the letter No.20 dated 25.6.2007 issued Jointly by the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 and as Contained in Annexure-8 to the writ application. (B) A writ in the nature of Mandamus or any Other appropriate writ/writs direction commanding the respondents not to give effect to the orders as contained in Annexure-8 of the writ application. With reference to the aforesaid prayer counsel for 2 the petitioner on being asked as to whether any representation for this purpose was filed before the prescribed authority i.e. Collector of the District, has referred to representation dated 12.9.2007 as contained in Annexure-6. From a bare perusal of the same it would be clear that the aforesaid representation is an antedated document in asmuch as this writ application itself was filed on 31.8.2007 and for which there is also no proof of its being actually filed in the office of the Collector . This Court also finds that in the alleged representation the petitioner herself had admitted that she had not filled up the centre number or the details thereof by giving name code of the Anganbari Centre for which she has been claiming for her selection and appointment. That being so the petitioner cannot be allowed to claim such relief in this Court in a writ application which is frivolous and based on her false as also incomplete statement. This writ application is accordingly dismissed. Anil Kr.Sinha (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)