1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.60 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra ..Applicant Vs. Shrishant @ Babu Mohanrao Sakhalkar and anr. ..Respondents ......... Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, for applicant. None for respondents. ......... CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 16th FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C. Heard Mrs.Deshmukh, learned APP for applicant­State. None appears for the respondents though served. This is an application for condonation of delay of about 116 days in filing Criminal Appeal against the order of acquittal. Since no cause is shown by the other side opposing the prayer made in this application and considering the grounds mentioned in the application for condonation of delay, the delay deserves to be condoned. 2] Criminal Application is allowed. Delay condoned. [R.G. KETKAR, J.] [P.B. MAJMUDAR, J.] 60­09.sxw 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.451 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO._____ OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra ..Applicant Vs. Shrishant @ Babu Mohanrao Sakhalkar and anr. ..Respondents ......... Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, for applicant. ......... CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 16th FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C. Heard Mrs.Deshmukh, learned APP for applicant­State. 2] Leave granted. 3] Appeal is admitted. Action under Section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, be taken. 4] Criminal Application is disposed of. [R.G. KETKAR, J.] [P.B. MAJMUDAR, J.] 60­09.sxw