(Stay Appl. No.5693 of 2008) (Misc. Complaint Appl. No.9049 of 2009) (Urgency Appl. NO.1313 of 2010) IN (WPMS No.1517 of 2008) Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Mr. Neeraj Garg, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the purpose of filing of writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the aforesaid statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Registry is directed to send back record of Suit No.29 of 2004 to the court below without any delay. Since matter pertains to the year 2004, the trial court is directed to decide the suit expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of the order. Stay Appl. No.5693 of 2008, Urgency Appl. No.1313 of 2010 and Misc. Complaint Appl. No.9049 of 2009 also stand disposed of. (V.K. Bist, J.) 08.04.2010 Arti