IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWELTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 24064 of 2007 Between: M/s. Artos Breweries Limited, Ramachandrapuram, Rep. by Mr. V.S.S. Babji, Authorised Signatory, R/o. Flat No. 502, Vijayanagar Colony, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Andhra Pradesh, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2 Sale Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam. 3 The Appellate Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Visakhapatnam. 4 The Commercial Tax Officer, Ramachandrapuram, East Godavari District. 5 The Director, A.P. Bevarages Corporation Limited, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 2nd respondent in not disposing of the stay petitions in unnumbered Revision petitions pending before the said 2nd respondent, consequent to the dismissal of the stay applications in statutory appeal Nos. E/108/06/07 by the 3rd respondent through his orders dt. 06-3- 2007, as being illegal, unjust, arbitrary, discriminatory and unconstitutional, being in violation of the provisions of the A.P. VAT Act, 2005 and Arts. 14, 19(1)(g) and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and consequently, direct the respondents not to initiate any coercive steps until the disposal of the statutory revision pending before the 2nd Respondent herein. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D.SESHADRI NAIDU Counsel for the RespondentS.: SPECIAL STANDING COUNSEL FOR COMMERCIAL TAX The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO :24064 of 2007 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. _______________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari __________________ Justice G. Rohini Date: 12th February, 2008 Nn/Gurc. HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No:24064 OF 2007 (Order delivered by the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) 12.2.2008