1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2880 OF 2010 Vinod S/o Jaidev Bundele .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri A. H. Koralkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. K. Kadam, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : P. V. HARDAS AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 11TH JUNE, 2010. PER COURT : . This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by which the petitioner prays that the respondents be directed to issue call letter for examination to the petitioner for the post of senior clerk. 2. Undisputedly, as per the previous advertisement post of senior clerk was advertised and a reservation was provided for 2 candidates belonging to the project affected category. As per the order of Division Bench of this Court and the Government Resolution issued on that basis, candidates belonging to project affected category were not required to under go the rigorous process of recruitment/selection and were appointed on the basis of their seniority list maintained by the respective Collectors. The aforesaid Division Bench judgment came to be reversed by the Full Bench and consequently, the process of recruitment which has commenced in so far as it related to the petitioner and similarly placed persons came to a stand still. By virtue of the judgment of the Full Bench, the recruitment process would have been continued by the respondents. The relief sought for by the petitioner, therefore, is only a misconceived relief. The petitioner may apply pursuant to an advertisement, if issued by the respondent, subject to eligibility of the petitioner at that time. 03. Thus, petition being sans merits is summarily dismissed with no order as to costs. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [ P. V. HARDAS, J.] bsb/June 10