IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 8568 of 2002 Between: 1 Siddiq Hussain, S/o. Ahmed Ali, R/o. Suleman Nagar, Meer Momin Saheb ki Pahadi, Rajender Nagar, R.R.Dist. 2 Moinuddin, S/o. Ahmed Ali, R/o. Suleman Nagar, Meer Momin Saheb ki Pahadi, Rajender Nagar, R.R.Dist. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, R.R. Dist. 2 The Station House Officer, P.S. Rajendra Nagar, R.R. Dist. 3 Sardar Baig, S/o. not known, Rajender Nagar, R.R.Dist. 4 Babu Saheb, S/o. Abdul Aziz, R/o. Pargi vil., Mallemanguda, R.R.Dist. 5 Samdani, S/o. Md. Yasin, Chandrayangutta, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the respondent No.3 not to harass and not to interfere with the personal liberties of the petitioners by calling the petitioners to the police station and forcing them to part with money. Counsel for the Petitioners : MR. THAKUR SINGH Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.8568 of 2002 O R D E R : This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the 3rd respondent in harassing the petitioners and interfering with their personal liberty by calling them to the police station and forcing them to part with money. In the counter-affidavit filed by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Rajendranagar P.S., R.R. District, all the allegations made by the petitioners have been denied and it is stated that in the enquiry conducted pursuant to the representation made by the petitioner dated 4.4.2002, it is found that there were certain civil disputes between the petitioners and the 4th respondent herein and accordingly the petitioners were advised to approach the competent Civil Court for redressal of their grievance. It is also specifically stated that none of the officials of the Rajendranagar Police Station ever harassed or interfered with personal liberty of the petitioners nor they were called on to the police station. The allegation that the petitioners were forced to part with the money has also been specifically denied. No affidavit-in-reply has been filed by the petitioners nor any other material is placed before this Court controverting the stand taken by the respondents 1 and 2 in the counter-affidavit. In the circumstances, no further enquiry is necessary and accordingly recording the statement of the respondents 1 and 2 in their counter-affidavit, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 05-02-2009 gbs