IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 12TH AUGUST 2010 / 21ST SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 24594 of 2010(Y) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ SUHARA, W/O.ABDUL KHADER, VALIYAKATH HOUSE, PORATHISSERY DESOM, IRINJALAKUDA NORTH, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.T.N.MANOJ RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, IRINJALAKUDA VILLAGE OFFICE,IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 24594 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 12th day of August, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner purchased certain properties from one Thanka and her husband Kuttan who is a deaf and dumb person. Petitioner seeks mutation of the properties in the name of the petitioner and also wants the Village Officer to accept property tax in respect of the same. The learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that, although initially there were some objections, in view of subsequent events those objections no more exist and therefore there is no difficulty in considering the petitioner's application for mutation. Accordingly this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the application for mutation stated to have been submitted by the petitioner, and pass orders thereon as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this W.P.(C)No. 24594 of 2010 -2- judgment. The petitioner shall produce all documents in support of the petitioner's claim before the 2nd respondent to enable the 2nd respondent to consider the application. If the 2nd respondent is of opinion that, some other authority is the competent person to consider the application, he shall forward the application to that authority forthwith, who shall pass orders on the same as directed above within the time limit prescribed as above. S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE shg/