IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 27TH JUNE 2008 / 6TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 100 of 2005(J) ------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------ JESSY RAJAN, W/O. LATE C.T. RAJAN, BUNGLOWIL PUTHEN VEEDU, MARANGOTTAKONAM, VALAKOM P.O., KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTTARAKKARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM. 4. MR.BAIJU, S/O. KARUNAKARAN, AMBALAKKARA HOUSE, THIRKKANAMANGAL, KOTTARAKKARA. 5. MR.ANILKUMAR, S/O. KARUNAKARAN, AMBALAKKARA HOUSE, THIRKKANAMANGAL, KOTTARAKKARA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.100/2005 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.28419/2003. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT.23.9.2003. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE NEWSPAPER REPORT AS APPEARED IN MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE REPORT ISSUEDBY THE KERALA FIRE FORCE. EXT.P5: COPY OF SOME PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE SCENE OF FIRE. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE FIR DT.25.7.2004 IN CRIME NO.751/2004 OF THE KOTTARAKKARA POLICE STATION. EXT.P7: COPYOF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.723/2004 OF KOTTARAKKARA POLICE STATION DT. 19.7.2004. EXT.P8: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DT.28.10.2004 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P9: COPY OF THE LETTER DT.12.11.2004. //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE. K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 100 OF 2005 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of June, 2008 J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~~~~~ The petitioner has approached this Court for early completion of the investigation of Crime Nos.723/2004 and 751/2004. The petitioner prays, the investigation is not so far over, so, a time limit may be fixed to complete the investigation. But, in view of, the recent decision of the Apex Court reported in Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P [2008(1)KLT 724(SC)], it is not proper for this Court to interfere with the investigation. The petitioner may work out her remedy by moving the concerned Magistrate's Court. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE) ps