1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.1367/2008 (Shanker Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : March 27, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Pawan Ojha, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegation of rape is against co-accused Narayan and so far as present petitioner is concerned, there is no allegation of rape against him. It is further contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that similarly situated co-accused Kachru has been granted bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no allegation of rape against the present petitioner, taking into account the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 2 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Shanker s/o Pratap be released on bail in FIR No.26/2008, P.S. Jawar Mines, Distt. Udaipur provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-