IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8670 of 2011 RAMOTAR RAI AND ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.03.2011 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 143, 341, 342, 504, I.P.C. and also Under Section 3(x) of the S.C. & S.T. (POA), Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that there is counter version of the occurrence also for which the accusation has been levelled under Sections 323, 341, 354, 504, 385/34 I.PC. and ¾ Dian Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the informant that the accusation was found false with regard to the case lodged on behalf of the petitioner’s side whereas the case of the informant has been found true by the police and since the provisions of S.C. & ST (P.O.A.) Act are there. Hence, the anticipatory bail is not maintainable. Considering the nature of accusation and the counter case, the accusation under S.C. & S.T. Act does not inspire confidence, and considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners namely Ramotar Rai, Kedar Ray, Sanjay Ray, Ram Udgar Rai, Babu Saheb Ray, Rajo Kumar @ Raja Kumar Ray and Raj kumar Ray, in the 2 event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M.. Biraul at Benipur, in connection with Kusheshwarsthan P.S. Case No. 282 of 2010. Ibrar/- ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)