.1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 6507 OF 2004 Central Bank of India .. Petitioner vs Mr.Surendra K.Patel & ors .. Respondents Mr.Rajesh Sethia for Petitioner CORAM : D.G.KARNIK, J DATE: 9TH AUGUST, 2004. P.C. 1. The petitioner is a nationalised bank and therefore provisions of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 are not applicable to it by reason of section 3 (1) (b) of the Act. The tenancy of the petitioner has been terminated by a ntoice to quit. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the notice to quit has been waived. I have perused the written statement which does not contain any plea of waiver. 2. No other point was urged. Petition rejected. 3. At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, petitioner is granted six months time for vacating of the suit premises subject to the petitioner filing an undertaking in this Court on usual form within a period of four weeks. D.G.KARNIK, J .PA