IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 19449 of 2008 Between: 1 Nazira Begum W/o.Malim Saleem H.No.7-6-7, Chintalapet, Gadwal Taluk,Mahabubnagar District 2 Habibunnisa Begum W/o.Md.Kaleem H.No.7-1-37, Momin Street Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Gadwal Municipality, rep.by its commissioner Gadwal 2 The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration ,Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad 3 A.Hanumanthu S/o.Sayappa Municipal Commisisoner (FAC), Gadwal Municipality Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or more especially one in the nature of writ of certiorari call for the records pertaining to show cause Notice No.G/86/4696/2007 dated 23.8.2008 issued by the 1st/3rd respondents in issuing the show cause notice u/s.344 of AP Municipality Act of 1965 vide notice No.G/86/4696 /07 dated 23.8.2008 and quash the same as it is against the principle of natural justice fair play illegal, arbitrary, and consequentially suspend the show cause Notice No.G/86/4696/2007 dated 23.8.2008 by the 1st respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.RAVI SHANKAR JANDHYALA Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.RADHA KRISHNA POLISETTY (SC FOR MPL) The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 19449 OF 2008 ORDER; 1. This writ petition has been ﬁled by the petitioners who are two in number assailing the show cause notice dated 23-8- 2008 issued under Section 344 of A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965. 2. When the writ petition came up for admission, Sri Polishetti Radha Krishna, learned standing counsel of Gadwal Municipality received notice on behalf of the Respondents 1 and 3. Learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration received notice on behalf of the 2nd respondent. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 4. Under the show cause notice the petitioners have been asked to submit their explanation as to why the building permission obtained by them cannot be revoked. No ﬁnal orders have been passed pursuant to the show cause notice. The petitioners have to submit their explanation and invite orders thereon. Without resorting to that course, the petitioners rushed to this Court invoking jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 5. In the given facts and circumstances, the writ petition ﬁled by the petitioners is misconceived. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioners to submit explanation to the show cause notice, dated 23-8-2008 within a week from today and invite orders thereon. No order as to costs. ______________________________ Justice B. Seshasayana Reddy 22nd September, 2008. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 19449 OF 2008 22nd September, 2008.