IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2730 of 2011 JAY MANGAL PRASAD SHARMA AND ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. ----------- 2/ 28.1.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Criticism on the ground that the court below, by the impugned order, even condoned the period of limitation, which, in his opinion, was intervening between the date of institution of the case and passing of the cognizance order, appears of no consequence as regards passing of the summoning order. The court below might have passed the order in mis-appreciation of the provision under section 468 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The order of summoning appears properly passed. The petition has no merit. It is dismissed. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)