IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH JULY 2011 / 15TH ASHADHA 1933 RP.No. 424 of 2011(N) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.35839/2004 Dated 08/09/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 IN THE WP: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DIRECTOR, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT, VIKAS BHAVAN,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER IN THE WP: ---------------------------------------------------------------- M.VIJAYAKUMAR,MELEVILA VEEDU, MANAMPOOR PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI. M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.No.424 of 2011 in W.P.(C)No. 35839 OF 2004 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 6th day of July, 2011 O R D E R Respondents 1 and 2 in WPC No.35839/2004 are the review petitioners. As per judgment dated 8.9.2010 this Court set aside the impugned order Ext.P7 and held that the petitioner is entitled to be appointed as a part time contingent employee in the Animal Husbandry Department with immediate effect and also for such other consequential benefits as specifically mentioned in the said judgment and the respondents are also directed to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- as costs to the petitioner. This review petition has been filed seeking review of the judgment to the extent it orders payment of Rs.10,000/- as costs. 2. There is a delay of 145 days in filing this review petition. Apart from the statement that the delay of 145 days was caused on account of administrative reasons it has not been properly explained. In the said circumstances, I am not inclined to condone the delay. Accordingly, the prayer for RP No.424/2011 : 2 : condoning the delay in filing review petition is rejected and consequently, this review petition is also dismissed. Sd/- (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge