(^ff \€TO 7.' ® 1. Single Beneh IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ?336oF 2009 (S.B.t PETITIONER RESPONDENTS iru Ram Kashyap S/o Shri Sirpat Ram Kashyap, aged about 48 years, Occupation- Service, posted as (L.D.T., posted at Balak Ashram, Ketam Block Katekalyan Dantewada, District Dantewada (C.G.) R/o village & Post Pandripani, Tahsil Jagdallpur, District Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Commissioner, Tribal Welfare and Development, Raipur (C.G.). 3. Collector, District Collectorate, Dantewada, District Dantewada (C.G.). 4. The Secretary, Mata Rukhmani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tahsil 8& District Jagdalpur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 HIGH COLTRT OF CHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5396 of2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Somam Ram Kashyap. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB^HoniMeSMSatishK.AgiMhptri,J. Present: Sbri Amiya Kant Tiwari, Advocate for the pctitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Law5/Ter forthe State/respondents 1 to 3. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 25 day of September, 2009) Heard leained coimsel for the parties. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that tlie instant petition is squarely covered by the decision ofthis Court rendered m Smt A.Lall v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others1, thus the petitioner may be peniiitted to make a representation to decide his case in the light of aforestated decision, subject to verification asto whether the respondent No. 4-Instltute is a Govemment Aided school and the petitioner is a teacher within the sanctioned strength. 2, Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents 1 to 3 submits that in the event, the petitioners make a representation- the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within a period offour weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representation. 3. In view of foregoing, according to the leaiiied counsel appearmg for the petitioner- iiotliing survives iii this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the v/iit petition is disposed of Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Anut 1 .-^A 2007 (l)BLJ 265