CW 6445/08 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6445/08 Dr. Raghuraj Singh Shekhawat Versus State & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 14/07/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Jitendra Mitrucka, for petitioner *** Instant petition has been filed for revising his seniority in the cadre of Junior Specialist which has been circulated by the respondents in April, 2007. Petitioner was initially appointed as Medical Officer on 17th January, 1978 and while in service obtained qualification of M.S. [Orthopaedic]. His candidature was considered being qualified for the post of Junior Specialist and on the recommendation of DPC he has been promoted vide order Ann.6 dated 7th December, 2005 against the quota of 2002-03 and his name was also included in the seniority list of Junior Specialist [Orthopaedic] published by the respondents Ann.7 dated 1st April, 2007. Counsel submits that persons who are similarly situated obtained qualification of M.S. [Orthopaedic] have been promoted against the quota of 1994-95 as Junior Specialist without any rhyme or reason. He has been promoted against the quota of 2002-03 and despite representation made, the same has not been considered by the respondents. The order by which petitioner has been promoted on the recommendation of DPC against the quota of 2002-03, if at all, he was aggrieved, he has remedy to file appeal before the Tribunal under the Act, 1976. CW 6445/08 [2] So far as publication of seniority list is concerned, it is based on the basis of regular selection and since petitioner has been promoted against the quota of 2002-03 seniority according to him in the cadre of Junior Specialist has been assigned to him. In view of efficacious remedy available to the petitioner at the relevant point of time assailing the order, if at all, he was aggrieved by filing appeal before Tribunal under the Act, 1976, this court is not inclined to exercise inherent jurisdiction available under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, the writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. Counsel submits that atleast he may be granted permission to make representation to the authority. He is always at liberty to make representation, if so advised. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA6445CW2008 14-7.doc