IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 11TH JULY 2008 / 20TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 10273 of 2005(W) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- MANJU SUDARSAN, SIVAM, ELAKAMON, VARKALA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN SRI.K.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD SRI.K.K.RAJEEV SRI.T.K.KAMALJITH RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. KERALA KHADI & VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE VICE CHAIRMAN, KERALA KHADI & VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE PROJECT OFFICER, DISTRICT KHADI & VILLAGE INDUSTRIES OFFICE, KOLLAM. SRI.V.V.JOSHI, SC, KHADI BOARD FOR R1 TO 3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.10273/2005 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE PROJECT REPORT. EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK DT. 27.1.2004. EXT.P3:- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.KB.5287/02/SEP. DT. 6.11.02 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. EXT.P4:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT. 14.1.04 FILED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P5:- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.K.B. 5287/02 S.E.P. DT. 24.8.04 GIVEN BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXT.P6:- COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER DT. 15.9.04. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE tss KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.10273 of 2005 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 11th July, 2008. J U D G M E N T The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayers :- “(ii) To issue a writ of certiorari or such other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Ext.P5 order by which the value of the vehicle is excluded from the total cost of the project for the purpose of sanctioning margin money assistance; (iii) To declare that the petitioner is entitled to get margin money assistance on the basis of the cost of the project as Rupees Ten Lakhs as per Ext.P1 project report. (iv) To issue a writ of mandamus or order or direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P6 appeal filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a time limit that may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.” In case Ext.P6 appeal has not so far been disposed of, there will be a direction to the second respondent/competent authority to dispose of the same with notice to the petitioner within four months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH, J ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.10273 of 2005 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 11th July, 2008.