IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND JANUARY 2008 / 12TH POUSHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 1766 of 2007(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.4972/2006 Dated 11/07/2006 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER -------------------------------------- D.BEENA RANI, S/O RAJU, AGED 45 YEARS, JAYABHAVAN, AKG LANE, CHAKKAMUKKU, PONKUNNAM P.O., THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.PRATHEESH.P RESPONDENTS: 1ST AND 2ND RESPONDENTS -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. K.T.JOSE, (AGE AND FAHTERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER). SECRETARY TO DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. BINDHU, (AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) MUNICIPAL SECRETARY, PARAVUR NAGARASABHA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. R1 BY GP SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN. R2 BY ADV. SRI.B.SURESH KUMAR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. ================================== Cont.Case (C)No.1766 of 2007 ================================== Dated this the 2nd day of January, 2008. JUDGMENT The Government have issued Annexure-2 order, essentially proceeding for acquisition. Obviously, the transaction cannot be made on the basis of any negotiation because the parties have not been able to arrive at a conclusion. Under such circumstances, no case of contempt is made out. Dismissed. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. sl.