IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P (S) N0. 'wg /2010 SINGLEB£N£H félchand Korrain, S/o, Bendilal, aged about 44 years; R/O. Farasgaon, Tahsil Kondagaon, District Bastar (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS v State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2] /C0mmissi0ner, Schedule Cast and Schedule Tribe Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3] / Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) ] KCollector (Tribal Welfare Department), Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 4 - HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU WRIT PETITION g3) Nd. 3231 ofZOIC ‘ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF'THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ‘ SB: Hon’hle Shri‘Satish‘K. Agnihotri, J. Presen ‘ ‘ Shn' Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate for the petitioner. ’ Shn' Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the on O8 ‘day of‘August, 201 1) State/respondents. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that; one 4'” ' ' account of the fact that the subsequent transfer order has been passed; the petition has become inh'uCtuons. Leamed counsel ,eppeaxing for other side does not controvelt‘the ab0ve submission. ’In View'of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become inhuctuous. Pk ~ 7, H 7 Sd/— 1 L SATISH K. AGNIHOTRIF WWEgL”J/ , f E‘ R t: iJ PETITIONER :_ Lalchand Korram.‘ V ‘ VERSUS ' RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others.