IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 4TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 13TH BHADRA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3129 of 2008() ------------------------------ CRA.366/2006 of ADDL.SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC)-IV, TRIVANDRUM CC.851/2002 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-I, NEYYATTINKARA .................... REVN. PETITIONERS: ------------------ 1. MADHAVANKUTTY, S/O. PADMANABHAN, SHEELA SADANAM ARUVIPPURAM, AYAIL DESOM, PERUMKIDAVILA 2. SANCTIONSH, S/O. DHARMAJAN, NULLITHOTTAMVEEDU, ARUVIPPURAM, AYAIL DESOM, PERUMKIDAVIL 3. AJI, S/O. BABU, AJIBHAVAN, AYAIL DESOM, PERUMKIDAVILA 4. KUTTAPPAN, S/O. VALAYUDHAN, VETUVILAKOM KADAYARA VEEDU,ARUVIPPURAM, AYAIL DESOM, PERUMKIDAVIL 5. VIJESH, S/O. KUTTAPPAN, VETUVILAKOM KADAYARA VEEDU,ARUVIPPURAM, AYAIL DESOM, PERUMKIDAVILA 6. NALINAKSHAN, S/O. MADHAVAN, KALLUVILA VEEDU, ARUVIPPURAM, AYAIL DESOM, PERUMKIDAVILA BY ADV. SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. BALAKRISHNAN, S/O. VELAYUDHAN THAMPI, SIVAVILASOM NADDORKOILLA, KOLLAYIL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADV. SRI.HARIKUMAR.S. FOR R1 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.M. NAZAR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 4-09-2008 , THE COURT ON 04/09/2008 PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.R.P. NO. 3129 of 2008 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 4-09-2008 ORDER Revision Petitioners 6 in number who were the accused in C.C. No. 851 of 2002 on the file of the J.F.C.M. I, Neyyattinkara were convicted for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 447, 427 and 506 (ii) read with Sec. 149 I.P.C. Their conviction and sentence were confirmed in Crl. Appeal No. 366 of 2006 before the Addl. Sessions Court, Fast Track (Adhoc No. IV), Thiruvananthapuram. It is the said conviction and sentence which are assailed in this revision. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter which primarily arose out of a civil dispute between the parties. They have filed Crl. M.A. No. 9407 of 2008 under Sec. 320 (6) read with Sec. 482 Cr.P.C. alleging that the civil dispute which was purely civil in nature has been settled between them and that the first Crl.R.P. 3129 of 2008 -:2:- respondent/complainant/injured has no subsisting grievance in the matter. Accordingly, applying the dictum laid down by the Apex Court in Madan Mohan Abbot v. State of Punjab - 2008 (4) SCC 582 the composition is recorded and it will have the effect of acquitting the revision petitioners of the aforementioned offences. This Crl.R.P. is disposed of as above. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani.