IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.7982 of 2007 Date of decision: May 24 ,2007 Sarup Singh V. State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA Present: Ms. Geeta Singhwal, Advocate for the petitioner. P.Sathasivam,J.(Oral) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. On going through the relief prayed for, admittedly, since the second respondent, Deputy Commissioner, Sonepat is the authority who would consider and vindicate the grievance of the petitioner, we are not inclined to entertain the above writ petition. However, we permit the petitioner to make proper representation to respondent No.2 within a period of two weeks from today. It is, however, made clear that if such a representation is made within the stipulated period, the second respondent shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of three months thereafter. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. A copy of the order be given dasti on usual charges. ( P. SATHASIVAM ) JUDGE May 24, 2007 ( RAJIVE BHALLA ) sks JUDGE