IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. 7143-M of 2007 DATE OF DECISION : 06.02.2007 Nirmal Devi .... PETITIONER Versus State of Haryana and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Virender S. Punia, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * Petitioner Nirmal Devi, who has filed complaint under Sections 3 (i) (x), 3 (i) (xi), 3 (i) (xiv), 3 (i) (xv), 3 (2) (iii) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, against respondents No.2 to 11, has filed this petition under Section 439 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to respondents No.2 to 11, vide order dated October 16, 2006, passed by this Court in Crl. Misc. No. 47464-M of 2006. I have heard counsel for the petitioner. Vide order dated August 11, 2006, passed by this Court in Crl. Misc. No. 47464-M of 2006, interim anticipatory bail was granted to respondents No.2 to 11 subject to their appearing before the trial court and furnishing regular bail bonds to its satisfaction. In terms of the said order, respondents No.2 to 11 appeared before the trial court and furnished their regular bail bonds, which were accepted and attested. Therefore, the interim order dated August 11, 2006 was confirmed by this court on October 16, 2006. I do not find any ground to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to respondents No.2 to 11 in the complaint case filed by the petitioner. Dismissed. February 06, 2007 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE