1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.20 OF 2007 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2666 OF 2004 Reuters India Pvt.Ltd. ...Plaintiff. vs. Vasdor Investments Pvt.Ltd. ...Defendant. --- Ms.Padmaja Dholakia i/b. Dholakia, Gupte & co., for Plaintiff. Mr.K.H.Mody i/b. R.M.G. Law Associates, for Defendant. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. DATED: 13th February, 2007. P.C.:- Admittedly, the summons for judgment has been served on defendant on 10.1.2007. There is no application made by the defendant for leave to defend within the time allowed by Order 37 of C.P.C. Therefore, in terms of the provisions of Order 37 of C.P.C. the plaintiff is entitled to a judgment. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for plaintiff. Perused 2 the record. Summons for judgment is granted. The suit of the plaintiff is decreed in terms of prayer clause of the suit. Refund of court fee as per rules. ---