IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 11219 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 05.09.2011 Gurmail Singh ..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr. M.K.Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jaswinder Singh, DAG Punjab, for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Raj Kumar Garg, Advocate, for respondent No.3. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH J. (ORAL) Petitioner is assailing order dated June 13th, 2011 (Annexure P/4), passed by respondent no.1, on the ground that the petitioner, who was complainant in the case, was neither impleaded nor heard by respondent No.1 in an appeal, filed by respondent no.3 and the impugned order was passed at the back of the petitioner. Mr. Garg, learned counsel for respondent no. 3 has made a statement at the bar that let the impugned order (Annexure P/4) be quashed and respondent no.1 be directed to decide the appeal after impleading the petitioner as one of the respondents and after hearing him in the appeal. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to it. CWP No. 11219 of 2011 -2- .. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, the present petition is allowed. Order, dated June 13th, 2011 (Annexure P/4) is quashed and the matter is remanded to respondent No. 1. Parties are directed to appear before respondent No.1 on September 19th, 2011. Respondent No. 3 shall move an application impleading the petitioner as one of the respondents in appeal, which shall be allowed by respondent No.1 and thereafter the appeal shall be decided in any case within 90 days, in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order after hearing the parties. (ALOK SINGH) JUDGE 05.09.2011 som