IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 12548 of 2008 Between: K.Uma Devi, W/o. K.Chandra Sekhar Reddy, R/o. # 1-78, Near R.T.C.Bus Stand, Banaganpally Post & Mandal, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Secretary, Industries and Commerce Department, Hyderabad. 2 The Director of Mines and Geology, Hyderabad. 3 The Deputy Director, Mines and Geology, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 4 B.Lakshminarayana Reddy, S/o. Sen Mohan Reddy, R/o. B.Singavaram Village, Kolimigundla Mandal, Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or writ one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 1s respondent in not disposing of the Revision Petition filed by the petitioner dt. 26-12-2007 questioning the orders of the 2nd respondent in Proc.No.29685/BGP/AH/07, DT. 22- 11-2007 as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the Revision Petiton filed by the petitioner dt. 26-12-2007. Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.N.SHOBA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3: GP FOR MINES & GEOLOGY Counsel for the Respondent No.4:-- The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No.12548 of 2008 ORDER: Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Mines and Geology appearing for the respondents, without expressing any opinion on merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider and dispose of the revision petition filed by the petitioner against the order of the second respondent, dated 22.11.2007, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after due notice to the fourth respondent as well as to all other parties to the revision petition. No costs. _______________ 18.06.2008 VGB