1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9025 OF 2010 Bapu s/o Dhondiba Gurav .. PETITIONER VERSUS Dhondiba Sitaram Gurav & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.T. Ghute, advocate for the petitioner. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 8 th OCTOBER, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Application tendered by the plaintiff / petitioner herein seeking amendment to the plaint has been turned down by the trial court in view of order passed on 30-4-2010. Application is tendered in a suit presented in 2003, in the year 2010, much after framing of issues and commencement of recording of evidence of the parties. There is also no justifiable reason shown by the applicant as to how the applicant / original plaintiff was prevented from tendering the application before framing of the issues. Order passed by the trial court cannot be said to be erroneous. In exercise of powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, no interference is 2 called for in the instant petition. Petition is devoid of substance, hence stand disposed of. 2 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp9025.10.odt