IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No. 40 OF 2009 Mr Hirachandji Samrutmalji Jain and Others ..Petitioners. vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. Khan Abdul Wahab, Advocate for the Petitioners. Smt P. H. Kantharia, A.P.P. for the State. Shri Shanez Mukri, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND A.R. JOSHI,JJ. A.R. JOSHI,JJ. A.R. JOSHI,JJ. DATED : 17TH MARCH,2009. DATED : 17TH MARCH,2009. DATED : 17TH MARCH,2009. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. The petitioners have challenged the F.I.R. The learned A.P.P. submits that F.I.R. has been registered on the orders of the Court under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. and the police has not yet come to the conclusion as to whether any offence has been committed or not and they have to file a report after investigating the case. 2. Since the F.I.R. has been registered on the order of the Magistrate, we do not think this is a fit case, at this stage, to interfere. The petitioners have all the remedies available before the Magistrate as and when the report is filed, if he is aggrieved of such report. 3. The petition is disposed of. (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (BILAL NAZKI,J.) (BILAL NAZKI,J.) (BILAL NAZKI,J.)