IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3810 OF 200 APPLICATION NO. 3810 OF 200 APPLICATION NO. 3810 OF 2004 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1894 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO. 1894 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO. 1894 OF 2003 Tipanna Lingappa Pujari ....... Applicant. versus The Governor, State of Maharashtra & Ors..... Respondents. ..... Shri Madhav Jamdar for the applicant. Mrs. P.H. Kantharia APP for the State. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED; DATED; DATED; 14TH SEPTEMBER, 2004. 14TH SEPTEMBER, 2004. 14TH SEPTEMBER, 2004. P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The applicant was granted furlough on condition of furnishing security to the tune of Rs. 20,000/-. Today he has filed another application seeking reduction of this amount, on the ground of inability to raise Rs. 20,000/-. A statement is made in the application that only Rs. 5,000/- has been collected. Statement is also there on record that this applicant has never been released earlier on furlough or parol. Taking into consideration the peculiar circumstances, the application is allowed. The amount is reduced to Rs. 5,000/- from Rs. 20,000/-. Other conditions remain same. Application accordingly disposed of. ...