fast7209.08 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 7209 OF 2008 The Special Land Acquisition Officer & another .. APPELLANTS VERSUS Shri Supadu Govinda Mahajan (Wakre) .. RESPONDENT WITH FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 7221 OF 2008 The Special Land Acquisition Officer & another .. APPELLANTS VERSUS Shri Raghunath Motiram Chaudhari .. RESPONDENT WITH FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 7219 OF 2008 The Special Land Acquisition Officer & another .. APPELLANTS VERSUS Shri Murlidhar Deoram Suryavanshi .. RESPONDENT fast7209.08 2 WITH FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 7213 OF 2008 The Special Land Acquisition Officer & another .. APPELLANTS VERSUS Shri Parshuram Govinda Warke ( Majhajan) .. RESPONDENT Mr. T.S. Londhe, AGP for the appellants. Mr. A.B. Kale, advocate for the respondents. ===== CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 7 th JUNE, 2011 PER COURT : 1 Learned counsel appearing for respondents has invited my attention to the judgment delivered by the Division Bench in group of First Appeals being First Appeal St. no. 2588/2009 and other companion matters decided on 27-7-2009. Present appeals are also covered by the same section 4 notification dated 30-10-1997 issued by the Land Acquisition Officer. Acquisition of lands is also for the same project i.e. Waghur project. The date of passing of award is 21-12-2000 which is common in the instant appeals as well as appeals decided by the Division Bench. The Division Bench while deciding the appeals has considered all relevant aspects and did not find fast7209.08 3 any need to cause interference in the appeals. For the reasons recorded by the Division Bench while delivering judgment in First Appeal St. no. 2588/2009 and other companion matters dated 27-7-2009, I do not find it necessary to cause any interference in the instant appeals. Appeals therefore stand dismissed. 2 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE dyb fast7209.08 4 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4272 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 7209 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4273 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 7221 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4274 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 7219 OF 2008 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4275 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 7213 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders | CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 7 th JUNE, 2011 1 These are the applications seeking condonation of delay of 228 days occurred in presenting the appeals. 2 Heard arguments advanced by Mr. T.S. Londhe, learned AGP for the State and Mr. A.B. Kale, learned counsel for the fast7209.08 5 respondents. Considering the contentions raised in the applications, applications deserve to be allowed and the same are accordingly allowed. Delay of 228 days occurred in presenting the appeals stands condoned. Civil applications stand disposed of. ( R.M. BORDE) JUDGE dyb