IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1465 of 2008 (M/S) Sanjay Kumar Sharma S/O Sri Suresh Dutt Sharma, R/O Mohalla Lalbara, Manglore Town, District Haridwar. …… Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand through its Secretary Education, Civil Secretariat, Dehradun and 12 others. … Respondents. Sri Ajay Veer Pundir, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri K.P.Upadhyay, learned Additional C.S.C. for the respondent no.1 to 4. Sri Alok Singh, Senior Advocate with Sri Arvind Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent no.5. Date August 21, 2008. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- i) Issue a writ of certiorari quashing election notification dated 2-8-2008 (contained in Annexure N3. 3 to the writ petition). ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent nos. 4 and 6 to decide the objections filed by the petitioner (contained in Annexure Nos. 5 & 6 to the writ petition respectively). iii) Issue any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case be passed in favour of the petitioner. iv) Cost of the petition be awarded in favour of the petitioner. Earlier, the petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 1422 of 2008 (M/S), Sanjay Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others before this Court. 2 On 13-8-2008, the said writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn and liberty was given to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy before appropriate forum. A copy of this Court’s order has been annexed as Annexure No.1. According to the petitioner, the election programme of the committee of management, Kewal Kanya Pathashala, Inter College, Manglore, Haridwar, has been notified by the Election Officer-respondent no.6 vide Annexure No. 3. The respondent no.5 has fabricated the voter list and inducted new forged members and respondent nos. 7 to 13 have submitted their nominations, who are amongst the 50 newly inducted forged members. As per election notification (Annexure No. 3), the election is scheduled to be held on 31-8-2008. The grievance of the petitioner is that the objection filed by the petitioner dated 7-8-2008 as well as objection dated 17- 8-2008 has not yet been decided by the Election Officer-respondent no. 6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.5 has stated at the Bar that the objection filed by the petitioner has already been decided by the Election Officer on 17-8-2008 itself. In the above facts and circumstances, since the election is in process, the Court should refrain from interfering after the election programme had commenced. Hence no interference is warranted in the matter. The writ petition is liable to be dismissed outright at the admission stage. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. ( B.S.Verma, J. ) RCP 3 4 5