IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.154 of 2009 MD.EKBAL ..PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. NOORJEHAN KHATOON …OPPOSITE PARTY For the petitioner : Mr. Indradeo Prasad For the State :Mr. S.C.Mishra,APP ----------- 2 16.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner assails the order dated 6-1-2009 whereby ad-interim maintenance at the rate of Rs. 1,000/- per month has been granted. It is the admitted position that wife is also maintaining the two minor children of the petitioner. It is also seen from the order that both parties were heard before the same was passed. By the order impugned the litigation cost in sum of Rs. 1,000/- has also been granted in favour of O.P. No. 2 (wife). All issues are open to be considered and decided by learned trial Court. Submission of the petitioner is that wife is not willing to live with him. The same can be raised and considered in accordance with law. Considering the fact that order is ad-interim in nature, this Court is not inclined to interfere therewith. The application is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )