te 'x HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BELASPUR PET3TIONER RESPONDENTS 2. Amarika Kumar Dhanker, aged 49 years, son of Sukalu Ram Dhanker, Assistant Teacher, Primary Schooi, Sirsakala Block & Tahsil Patan, District Durg (CG). Versus State Government of Chhatttsgarh. through the Secretary, Schoo! Education Department, D.K.5. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). Dlstrict Education Officer, Durg, Dist. Durg (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:• Gowri Shri Somkant Verma, counsel forthe petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Advocate General for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 25 day of February, 2009) Shri Y.S. Thakur, iearned Dy. Advocate Generai appearing forthe State submits that the impugned order dated 3-9-2008 (Annexure-P/1) has admittedly been passed Without affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Shri Thakur further submits that the State shall recal! the order and the State may be granted Jiberty to take appropriate steps after issuing show cause notice and affording an opportunjty of hearing to the petitioner, in accordance with law. in view of the above categoricai statement made by the leamed Dy'. Advoeate General, according to iearned counsel for the petitioner nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingiy, the petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid IIberty. Consequently, pending appiications, jf any, also stand disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge