MP 1 Appln2557_10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2557 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra ... Applicant Versus Chandrashekhar Parshuram Pawaskar ... Respondent Smt.P.P.Shinde, APP for the Applicant State. Mr.J.B.Kocheta, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : J. H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 19TH DECEMBER 2011 P. C. : Heard. 2. The State has moved this application for cancellation of bail granted to the present applicant by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune on 02.05.2009 in C.R.No.130 of 2009 registered with Haveli Police Station, Pune for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 r/w. Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. According to the original complainant Madhusudan Chaskar, he is the owner of certain land and his power of attorney holders Chandrashekhar Pawaskar, who is the present applicant, and one Nitin More had played fraud on him and had transferred his property. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, while granting bail to the present applicant, noted that anticipatory bail was previously granted to him and it was admitted fact that the complainant had executed the power of attorney in favour of the applicant on the basis of which he executed the sale deed on 02.03.2005. 3. The respondent / accused is on bail for last two and half years. As admittedly, there is a power of attorney in his favour, a question is whether he MP 2 Appln2557_10 had really played fraud or not. In such case, I do not find any valid reason to cancel the bail granted by the Additional Sessions Judge. It may be noted that similar applications in respect of other accused persons are already rejected by this Court. 4. Therefore, this application stands rejected. (J. H. BHATIA, J)