/" BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. p. (S) NO. 5^ g<5 / 2009 PETITIONER '\^'£-- ^A^^^.^ ^yy^- ..ni..-"'" \>-' RESPONDENTS 1) .2) P.K. Anand, S/o late Shri O.P.Anand, aged about 48 years, working as S.D.0. Bhatapara Canal Construction, Sub-Division No.3, Tilda, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh- - through the Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resourees Department, Sihawa Bhavan, Raipur. ^iCE ;^"%. •t/"';. r's?-. i.-!%M \ 'Ss 'tt 3) T.R.Meshram, S.D.0. Irrigation Consfruction, Sub-Division Baloda Baza.ai, District Raipur. IWSIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE 7 »J CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^:-;-' ,,,,;sss"^ ;:i!''rf';'i4 '^ !•' 1&-. ^. il S'lBSa, 1i '•to,.."S!'a" ^~v .^\<S '^h.y' •' ';l:^,l2f' &v~ !l"i! PETITIONER rert ^^J*^<s'?^1rf^*l VERSUS srDi P.K. Anand. State of Chhattisgarh and others. Shri Anand Daderiya counsel for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. A.G. & Shri Arvind Dubey, PL the respondents/State. lAfi*th the consent of the counsei for the parties, the matter Is heard inaliy. Chaiienge in this petition is to the order dated 30.6.2009 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.1 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from the post of SDO Bhatapara, Canal Construction Sub Divsslon No.3 Tiida, District Raipur to Baloda Bazar ss SDO Irrigation Construction, on administrative grounds. Counsel for the petiticner submits that the impugned transfer order Is contrary to t'ne transfer poiicy issued by the State Government. He however submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make representation. He also seeks a direction to the authorities concerned to decide the said representation expeditiously. To this prayer of the petitioner, counsel for the respondents/State has no objectfon. Accordingty, the petltion is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty^as aforess.id. If the petitioner makes a representation within a period of 10 days from the date of.receiptof copy of this order, the same would be decided by the authorifies concerned within a further period of three weeks frpm the date of its receipt strictly in accordance with law. Tiii then the order impugned shall not be given effect to. Pritinker Diwakar / Judge -^'