C^\^7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fC) No. ^2^-/2Q11 PETITIONER ^s^" V. ^.-•~ •^''>.-:- r>..>'' Shiv Ratan, S/o Late Jagannath, aged about 45 years, Occupation Cultivator, Caste-Gqnd, R/o ViU. Patrapali, Tahsil Ramanujganj, District-Surguja (C.G.). ?<* ysS- VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1.^ Shiv Prasad, S/o Daduram, aged about 35 years, Caste Koir, Siksha Karmi Grade-I, R/o Dauna, Tahsil Ramanuj Nagar, District-Surguja (C.G.). •-y 2. 3. Director, Panchayat and Social Services, Directorate, Raipxir(C.G) Upper Coramissioner (Revenue), Bilaspur Division (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER : As shown in the cause title. ^ 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As shown in the cause titie. 3. PARTICULARS OF THE ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE PETITION IS PREFERRED : an^t^ fc-ii.+.^.n^i sh'< 'Hf?^T ®'a DeepEi ~S^ '^tPIRra, 'grahTTS. fawi'yy 31 KltlCIT a»*II«i 31T^9T iR-g? ^?:..f>..:.^)...5'.&.-l:.J^L1 "WI. 200 tsre^i' 3D^I¥(<IIWHfe( SB : Hon'ble Shri h/ianindra Mohan Shrivastava, J, 28-01-2011 Shri Atanu Ghosh, counsei for Learned counsei for the appointment as Panchayat Secretan Commissioner, Bilaspur Division anc granted against the petitioner and in Learned counsel for the petitioner tnat appeai, due to aboiition of the Panchayat was designated as the au to him in the year 2007 and thereafte been revived, the records were reql Director, Panchayat Services to the been sent because of which the Learned counsei further submitted th| Sarguja being constituted, the competent to decide the appeai. The Director, Panchayat No.172/Panchayat/'99-00 (Shiv Commissioner, Sarguja Division for <j undue deiay. With the aroresaid observationj furtder cm^f^T^ft'T 'RP^ff "^ 'fe1^ <Pl^f< ^? sifigi? air^r (he petitioner. ibetitioner submitted that petitioner's was chatienged in appeal before the vide order dated 6/6/2000, stay was favour of the appeilant - S'niv Prasad. submits that during the pendency of office of the Commissioner, Director, (hority and the records were transferred as the office of the commissioner has iliired to be sent from fne office of the iommissioner but the records have not [appeai is stili pending consideration. th^t now, on account of a new division of Clommissioner of Sarguja Division is thfat sha|ll transmit the records of the appeal Pr^isad v. Shiv Ratan Ram) to the lecision in accordance with. law, without >, the petition is nnally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [Tftg^gA