? <D SINSIE BQt^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION (Sl No. ^^5?/2011 PBTITIONER Antram Chandel S/o Shri Balaram Chandel, aged ^' about 53 years, Head Master, presently working at Govt. Primary School Basantpur, Block-Masturi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS ^v y"" .."" ^^^ <y;n"". --"" ^' RESPONDENTS: II ^i'^i.gK "^^' 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2^ The Collector District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer Districf-Bilaspur (C.G.) <. Janak Ram Dhruv Head Master, presently working at Govt. Primary School Chanadongari, Block-Takhatpur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^-Kv^^ PETITIQNER RESPONDENTS HIGHCOURTORai-iHAmSGARHiBH.ASPyR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5637 OF 2011 Antram Chandet Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 of the Constitution of {ndia) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate forthe patitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State. 5. ORDER »nd (Passed on this 22"" day of September, 2011) ChalSenge En this petition te to the order dated 15th July, 2011 (Annexure P-1), passed by the Collector, Bilaspur, whereby, the petitioner worksng as Headmaster at Govt. Primary School Basantpur, Blook Masturi, has been transferred to Govt. Middie School Chanadongari, Btek Takhatpur, on admsnistrative grounds- Shri Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submsts that there is no vacant post of Headmaster available at the transferred place of posting Le. Govt. Middte SGhooi Chanadongari, as one Janak Ram Dhruv, is already posted there and he has not been transferred elsewhere. Thus, the impugned transfer order d^er^es to be quashed. Shri Sao, iearned counsel appearing for the State/ respondents submits that there appears to be someerror in the impugned transfer order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P/1), thus, the same shall not be given effect to in respect of the petitioner, tiit appropriate order is passed sn administrative exigency and publte interest, posting the petitiooer at a pSace where clear vacant post is avaiiable. In view of the above, according to Shri Sharma, nothing survives for adjudlcatton in this p^stson. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforestated observation. ^7 sshok Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge