IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 392 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 392 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 392 OF 2007 Indian Oil Corporation Limited ...Petitioners V/s, Tahasildar, Kurla (Mulund) & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Gaurav Joshi i/b. RMG Law Associates for the Petitioners. Ms.Geeta Shastri, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 26, 2007 DATED : FEBRUARY 26, 2007 DATED : FEBRUARY 26, 2007 P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- . Heard the learned Counsel for the rival parties. Tahsildar, Kurla, has filed affidavit dated 26th February, 2007 stating therein, reading as under :- "I say that by letter dated 23rd February, 2007 the Respondent No. 2 has informed the Petitioner that the demand Notices dated 4th January, 2007, 12th January, 2007 and 5th February, 2007 (which are Exhibit E at Page No.3 and Exhibit F at Page No.44 and Exhibit I at page No.51 of the Petition) will be withdrawn and that the revised fresh Notice will be issued as set out in the said order dated 23rd - 2 - February, 2007. I crave leave to refer to and rely upon the letter dated 23rd February, 2007. I say that in view of the said letter dated 23rd February, 2007 the grievances of the petitioner has been redressed and therefore nothing survive in the petition." . In view of the above, the cause of action in respect of the petition does not survive. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of with no order as to costs. (V.C. DAGA, J.) (V.C. DAGA, J.) (V.C. DAGA, J.)