IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION No.17588 of 1999 Between: The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Sri Ch.Kumara Swamy, S/o Ch.P.Narsimhaiah, aged 45years, Krishna Chilakalapudi, Machilipatnam, Medak Dist., ..... PETITIONER AND Tadepalli Vijaya narsimha Rao S/o Late Narasimha Rao Vodali Village, Krishna Dist., .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to pass orders particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari by calling for the records of the A.P., Admn Tribunal in OA No.6187/98 dt 9-10-98 and quash the same to the extent that it directs the petitioners to pay interest on cummuted value of pension Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.PRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION No.17588 of 1999 ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Eswaraiah) As no notice was served on the respondent, this court by order, dated 01-12-2004, granted two weeks time for compliance of office objections i.e., payment of batta, along with a petition furnishing correct postal address of the respondent, in default, the writ petition stands dismissed against the respondent. The said order has not been complied with. But, however, this court by order, dated 17-06-2009, again permitted the petitioner to find out the present correct postal address of the respondent and take out notice afresh personally by registered post with acknowledgment due returnable in two weeks, failing which, the writ petition stands dismissed against the respondent. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, though the name of the counsel is printed in the cause-list, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the order of this court, dated 17-06-2009, has not been complied with. Therefore, we are of the opinion that the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J _____________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J Date : 24-07-2009 Prv