IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3223 of 2010 KAMLA KANT MISHRA SON OF LATE BALDEO MISHRA, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- RAHUL NAGAR, P.O. + P.S. – SULTANGANJ, DISTRICT – BHAGALPUR. Versus 1. THE TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR THROUGH THE VICE CHANCELLOR. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR AND PRO-VICE- CHANCELLOR OF TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 3. THE REGISTRAR, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 4. THE FINANCE OFFICER, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 5. THE PRINCIPAL MURARKA COLLEGE, SULTANGANJ DISTRICT BHAGALPUR ( A CONSTITUENT UNIT OF TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR) ----------- 02. 23.02.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and Mr. Ashok Kumar Keshri, counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent – University. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the arrears of pension, difference of leave encashment as also other dues as indicated in the writ application. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- University submits that representation submitted by the petitioner on 06.11.2009 (Annexure-3) does not disclose any details, so as to consider the claim of the petitioner and no decision can be taken in absence of any relevant details, however, petitioner files a fresh representation, the same shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for 2 the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.3. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)