1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP Nos. 6856 of 2010 alongwith other connected matters. Decided on: 25th November, 2010. 1. CWP No. 6856 of 2010 Lal Chand ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others …… Respondents. 2. CWP No. 6857 of 2010 Dhayan Singh ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others …… Respondents. 3. CWP No. 6860 of 2010 Brestu Ram ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others …… Respondents. 4. CWP No. 6861 of 2010 Harbans Kumar ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others …… Respondents. 5. CWP No. 6862 of 2010 Birbal Ram ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others …… Respondents. 6. CWP No. 6863 of 2010 Bhag Chand ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others …… Respondents. 7. CWP No. 6864 of 2010 Ludar Chand ….. Petitioner. 2 Versus State of H.P. & others …… Respondents. 8. CWP No. 6865 of 2010 Sadhu Ram ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others …… Respondents. 9. CWP No. 6866 of 2010 Krishan Kumar ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Sood, Additional Advocate General. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim work charge status from the date they completed eight years of service. Reliance is placed on the decision of this Court dated 28th July, 2010 rendered in Rakesh Kumar vs. State of H.P. and others, CWP No. 2735 of 2010. 2. The learned Additional Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The petitioners may file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the second respondent within a period of one month from today. The second 3 respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in the light also of the decision referred to above within a period of another four months. The petitioners will produce a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the judgment referred to in this judgment while submitting the representation(s). 3. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. November 25th, 2010. (Justice V.K. Sharma), (hl/kck) Judge.