w e^ •"-<:-£; o£??i;H ^ f-i a~o IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION(S) N0. '^-€iq'(o /2006 ..8-: PETITIONER /-' k.^> k/ou.\':y^/ i^f> ^v.~< K^"' /\]/^y Tarun Kumar Chandra, Son of Late Shri Jugla Raru Chandra, Aged about 36 years, Assistant Teacher, Govemruent PriiEiary School Deuruiar, Block Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) ><'J''.^-'" K^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^" r*;J^ I" ^n^ o lo ^l/^^ .\S»- 2. .^- ^' ^ ffi'.-. /:' ". .1 *% 'v^. ^ ^ A'/ /i^ State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secrctary, Department of Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). The Coiniuissioner, Tribal WeUare Departiaent Raipur, Chhattisgarh. The Assistant Com.m.issioner, Tribal Welfare Departnient, Head Office -Raigarh (C.G.). The District Coordinator, Tribal Welfare Department, Head OfSce- Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE XI-HC-78 <^l*<Cfll SiHrai s^'^rraraq', aiTfly'is, fstciiyy <-3.p.(.S^ .-7G7&/<?6 ¥Pi[ 200 3T1^?T 4s|t»i ('i^i^'d^tfl') 3n^7T?iTR.li+ (raT3TI^Tshlicb 5iAhaA .\tV' \- STtnwgf^rsn^r 20.1Z2006 6ovemm4nt Ipr •the petitioner(s). Advocat'e for the State/ lAr. AdiNwmi Shukta, counsel flx- Mr. Sushil Oubey, respo»Klents. With the consent of lewne^ wirit petitwn is hewd finally. Common order dictated in W^rit Petition (5.) 7075/2006 in open Court, passed separately. +|<)F<-<41H ^i*<<-fT^'fe'<a <Rfwi< ^srf^Tsn^r counsel for the parties, the Sd/- Satish K. Agnilintri Judge P.T.O. HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR 5IN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SAT1SH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WIOT PETniON (S.) N0.7075 OF 2006 Petitioner Bharot Bhusan Dadsena wrais tespondents ; Sttrt-e of ChhaMsysrh ond olhers WRTT PETTTKW fS.l N0.7076 OF aM6 Petitioner Tarun Kumar Chfflidra versus Re^ondents Starte of Chhcrttbgarh and others WRTT PETTTION fS.V N0.7077 OF 2006 Petitioner Monohar Lal Tiwnri versus Resoondents State of Chhertttegurh end olhers WMT PETmON (5.1 N0.7078 OF 2006 Petitioner Omprotosh Jaiamal versus Respondents : State of Chhatf'tegarh and others WOT PETmON (S.) NO.TO83 OF 2006 Petitioner Nnrsin^ Rorttiiyn versus Respondents Stnte of Chhatti^arh and o-thers •2-^ WRrT PETTTION (6.) N0.7084 OF 2006 Petjtioner Re^gndents versus Vipm Chand PaMtara State of Oihattisgirh and others WRTT PETTTION fS.l N0.708S OF 2006 Petitioner : Jdnwhar Lal yadav versus (tesoondents Stete of Chhattisgarh md others Petitioner WIUT PETmON fS.l N0.7086 OF 2006 Atonnu ftoim Rathiya versus Respondents : State of Chhdrttisgarh and others And WWT PETTTION fS.l N0.7091 OP 2006 Petitjpner ResDondents verais Kariwuya Lal 5ahu State of Chhatt'isyn'h and olhers Present : Mr. Ashwoni Shukla,counselfer-thepetttioner(s). Mr. Sushil Dubey. Sovemment Adwcate for the State/ respondents. ORDER (Passed on this 20**' day of December, 2006) Leamed counsel appearwg for Ihe petltioners as also for the Stnte/respondents jointly submit that Ihe facts and question af lawi involved in •the present writ petitions we squcrely covered by the decision of -this Court in Ihe <ase of ya^went KlMiw Blwiwdwoj vs. Munieipal Corporation. t)wy and evwtim^ . 2. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petituns are disfmsed of 'm terms of the decision of this Court in Ihe mcrtter of Ya^iwimt Kumar Siaradwaj (5upra), subject to verifiaition of 'the fact as to wihether the petitioners have acquired B.EdyB-TJ. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circubxrs ctated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of -this order be plaoed on •the record of the conneeted writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006CEIXWJR-C696 iiriahosh