1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (CONTEMPT JURISDICTION) THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2010 THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.477 OF 2010 ************ R.Narayanan, S/o.G.Raghavan, No.10, Yamuna Nagar, (Near Neelan School) Guduvancheri (West) -603 202 Kancheepuram District. .. Petitioner Vs. Narayanan, Executive Officer, Nandhivaram-Guduvancheri Town Panchayat, Guduvancherri – 603 202. Kancheepuram District. .. Respondent Contempt Petition praying that this Court be pleased to initiate proceedings against the respondents for their wilful disobedience to the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 03/02/2010 and made in W.P.No.1900 of 2010 and punish him accordingly. The above Contempt Petition coming on this day before this Court for hearing in the presence of Mr.S.Sathia Chandran, Advocate, for the petitioner herein; and of Mr.V.R.Thangavelu, Advocate for the respondent herein; and upon reading the petition and affidavit of R.Narayanan, filed herein; the Court made the following order:- https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner, praying that this Court may be pleased to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court, on 3.2.2010, in W.P.No.1900 of 2010. 2.On 3.2.2010, this Court had directed the first respondent to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 28.1.2010, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as well as to the second respondent, as expeditiously as possible, not later than twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the said order. 3.At this stage of the hearing of the contempt petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent had placed before this Court, the proceedings of the respondent, dated 9.6.2010, stating that the order passed by this Court, on 3.2.2010, in W.P.No.1900 of 2010, had been complied with. 4.However, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that the proceedings of the respondent, dated 9.6.2010, had not been communicated to the petitioner, till date. 5.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent had submitted that the contempt petition had been filed https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3 prematurely, even before the time granted by this Court, by its order, dated 3.2.2010, had expired. 6.In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the respondent, and in view of the proceedings of the respondent, dated 9.6.2010, placed before this Court, this Court is of the considered view that no further orders are necessary in the present contempt petition. Hence, the contempt petition stands closed. Witness the Hon'ble Thiru M.YUSUF EQBAL, The Chief Justice of High Court at Madras, as aforesaid, this the 15th day of July, 2010. SD/- DEPUTY REGISTRAR (OS) //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2010. COURT OFFICER (O.S.) From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the orders/judgments/Decrees in this format. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4 Cns. CONTEMPT PETITION No.477/2010 THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN ORDER DATED : 15/07/2010 FOR APPROVAL :25/08/2010 APPROVED ON :25/08/2010 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/