1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 799 of 2009 IN Criminal Appeal No. 579 of 2006 [Sakharam Sirpat Sutar Vs. State of Mah.s] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Ms. Sangeeta Jachak, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. W.M. Sambre, Public Prosecutor for the respondent. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND A.B.CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATE : 04th April, 2009. 1. Heard. 2. The fact that the applicant's daughter is in need of an open heart surgery due to her heart ailment is not in dispute. 3. In these peculiar premises, and on this ground, we grant temporary bail to the applicant. 4. We, therefore, direct that the applicant be released on bail for a period of sixty days from the date of release, on furnishing a Personal Bond and a Solvent Surety in a sum of Rs.10,000-00 [rupees ten thousand only]. 2 5. We direct that during the period of surgery and till discharge of patient from the hospital on recovery, when the applicant would remain at Aurangabad, shall report his attendance to Osmanpura Police Station once in a week, and on his return to his native place, mark his attendance on every Tuesday and Friday in Sindhkheda Raja Police Station in Buldana district, and report back to the jail on due date. 6. Application is disposed of. Judge Judge |Hedau| 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Criminal Writ Petition No. 179 of 2008 [Smt. Sheela Madhukar Gudadhe & another Vs. State of Mah. & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. R.S. Kurhekar, Adv., for the petitioners. Mr. N.W. Sambre, Public Prosecutor for respondent nos. 1 to 5. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND A.B.CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATE : 02nd April, 2009. Learned Public Prosecutor Mr. Sambre prays for time to make a statement as to how much time the Director General of Police would take to decide as to whether which amongst the reports, namely one of Deputy Superintendent of Police, CID Mr. Tayade, or Deputy Superintendent of Police , CID, Mr. Rajput, should be accepted. 4 He further states that it may need some time to go through the papers and take a decision in the matter. We, therefore, grant him time till 9th April, 2009 to make a statement in this regard. Judge Judge