IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY, THE 22ND MAY 2009 / 1ST JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 13585 of 2009(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- H.SHAHUL HAMEED, S/O. HANEEFA KUNJU, AGED 63 YEARS, ANZAR MANZIL, THANNEERKUDY, OYOOR P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM DISTRICT, KOLLAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHADAYAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, KOLLAM. 3. THE CITU, AKKAL UNIT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR, SRI. KUTTAN PILLAI, S/O. SOMAN PILLAI, THOTTATHIL VEEDU, KANNAMKOTTU, AKKAL P.O. 4. THE AITUC, AKKAL UNIT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR, SRI. VIKRAMAN PILLAI, S/O. BHASKARAN PILLAI, THEKKEKAVADIYIL VEEDU, KANNAMKOTTU, AKKAL P.O. 5. THE INTUC (S), AKKAL UNIT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR, SRI. ANZAR, S/O. AMEERKANNU, MAMOOTTIL VEEDU, KANNAMKOTTU, AKKAL P.O. 6. ABDUL VAHID, S/O. SHAMSUDEEN, PARAVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, KANNAMKOTTU, AKKAL P.O. 7. JANARDHANAN, S/O. KRISHNAN, THADATHIL PUTHEN VEEDU, KANNAMKOTTU, AKKAL P.O. WP(C). NO. 13585/2009 (P) 8. THE INTUC, AKKAL UNIT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR, SRI. SUJAHI, D/O. MYTHEENKUNJU, AJMAL MANZIL, KANNAMKOTTU, AKKAL P.O. 9. THE BMS, AKKAL UNIT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR, SRI. REGHU, S/O. KOCHUNANOO, KUZHIVILA VEEDU, KANNAMKOTTU, AKKAL P.O. 10. THE PDP, AKKAL UNIT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR, SRI. SHIHAB, S/O. MUHAMMED KANNU RAWTHER, PUTHUVELILPUTHENVEEDU, KANNAMKOTTU, AKKAL P.O. 11. ABDUL SALAM, S/O. MUHAMMED RAWTHER, A.S.VILLA, KANNAMKOTTU WARD, ELAMADU VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 12. THE ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER, PUNALUR, KOLLAM. BY GOV. PLEADER SRI. P. A. SALIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC. 13585 / 2009 P APPENDIX PETTIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT. P1 : A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 20.5.2009 EXT. P2 : A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE PETITIONER DATED 5.5.2009. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ PS TO JUDGE dl/ P.R. RAMAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.13585 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 22nd day of May, 2009. JUDGMENT Raman, J, Despite notice, the party respondents have not entered appearance to contest the matter. In the circumstances, there will be a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to give necessary protection to the petitioner for felling the rubber trees from the property of fourth respondent and after processing it to transport the same without being obstructed by respondents 3 to 10. However, right, if any, of respondents 3 to 10 for work or for wages is a matter which they can agitate before a legal forum in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of as above. P.R. Raman, Judge P. Bhavadasan, Judge sb.