IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 24112 of 2008 Between: 1 S.V.B.Goud, S/o. late S.B.Goud, R/o. 4-77, Main Road,Linganpet, Tq.Yellareddy,Nizamabad District. 2 V.Brahmaiah, S/o. late Vishwanadhan, R/o. 5-6-113, Vidyanagar Colony, Kamareddy, Nizamabad District. 3 G.Sathaiah, S/o. late Balaiah, R/o. 4-9-68, Ishampura, Kamareddy, Nizamabad District. 4 P.Mogulaiah, S/o. late Narayana, R/o. 5-8-619, Ashoknagar Colony, Kamareddy, Nizamabad District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 APSRTC, Rep by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Depot Manager, APSRTC,Bus Depot, Kamareddy, Nizamabad District. 3 The Depot Manager, APSRTC, RNG-II Depot, Ranigunj, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or direction particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the impugned order of transfer issued in Proceedings No.P1/813(1)/08-KMR, dated 27-10-2008, as illegal, without jurisdiction, capricious, arbitrary and in violation of Art.14, 16 & 21 of the Constitution of India and in violation of Art.14, 16 & 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently pray this Hon'ble court to grant all the consequential beneﬁts in the interest of justice and fair play. Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.V.NARASIMHA GOUD Counsel for the Respondents: SMT.B.G.UMA DEVI The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 24112 of 2008 ORDER: It is stated that under administrative exigencies, the petitioners’ services were sought to be utilized by the respondents at Ranigunj Bus Depot. Now, the learned counsel for the petitioner is trying to make a mount out of mole hill and contends that the respondents are transferring the petitioners from one region to the other without any jurisdiction. Since the services of the petitioners are sought to be utilized in view of administrative exigencies for a period of just one month, I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition. No ground is made to interfere with the impugned order. The writ petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed at the admission stage. No costs. _______________ C.V. RAMULU,J DATE: 4th November, 2008 pnb