IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2925 of 2010 M/S J.P.YADAV Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- For the petitioner: Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha,Advocate For the Union of India: Mr.S.M.Iqbal Hasan Rahmani Advocate ----------- 2 19.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner has invoked Clause 24 which relates to dispute redressal system with regard to the contract awarded to him relating to Package No. BR/10/01. Certain differences arose between the petitioner and the respondent authority on the completion of the work of schedule and certain action having been taken against the petitioner on failure on the part of the petitioner. Since no decision has been taken or communicated to the petitioner to annexure-9 dated 12.1.2010 the present writ application came to be filed. Since there a dispute redressal mechanism in place in the contract as Clause-24, this writ application can be disposed of at this stage with a direction upon the respondent no.3, the Project Manager, PMGSY Project Circle, Patna to respond to the petitioner representation, annexure-9 preferably within a time frame of eight weeks from the date of production or communication of a copy of this order. Till a decision is conveyed to the petitioner the matter will not be precipitated. This writ application stands disposed of with the above direction. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)