IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.THANKAPPAN FRIDAY, THE 28TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 6TH ASWINA 1929 RP.No. 866 of 2004(Y) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.12389/2004 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER /ADDL. RESPONDENT NO.6 --------------------------- N.P.SEKHARA PISHARODY, S/O.NHANGATTIRI PISHARATH MALU PISHARASSIAR, "GURU MANDIRAM", ULLANOOR DESOM, P.O.TRITHALA, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.RAJESH KORMATH SMT.PREETHY KARUNAKARAN SMT.M.R.MINI SMT.MEENA.A. SMT.SANJANA R.NAIR SRI.V.S.ROBIN RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 1 TO 5 ---------------------------------------------- 1. V.P.UNNIKRISHNAN, S/O.N.P.NARAYANA PISHARADI, P.O.NHANGATTIRI, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS & CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, KOZHIKODE. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS & CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, TIRIR. 4. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NHANGATTIRI BHAGAVATHY TEMPLE, NHANGATTIRI, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 5. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY TO REVENUE (DEVASWOM), TRIVANDRUM. 6. K.T.SABARISAN, S/O.GOPI NAIR, VELATH HOUSE, OLD COURT ROAD, PATAMBI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.RAJAGOPALAN SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/09/2007, ALONG WITH RP NO. 873 OF 2004 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & K. THANKAPPAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------ R.P.NOS.866 & 873 OF 2004 in W.P.(C) NO.12389 OF 2004-Y ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 28th day of September, 2007. O R D E R Radhakirshnan, J: The above review petitions are preferred by the additional 6th and 5th respondents in the writ petition respectively. The learned counsel for the review petitioners submit that copy of the memo was not served on the petitioners before the case was disposed of and there was no settlement between the parties. The submissions of the review petitioners are recorded and the review petitions are disposed of stating that the statements in the memo recorded by this Court would not bind the petitioners. K.S RADHKARISHNAN JUDGE, K. THANKAPPAN, JUDGE. cl CRL.A.NO. . 2 CRL.A.NO. . 3