IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL P.I.L. Writ Petition No. 1221 of 2003 (M/B) 1. Mahipal Singh s/o Sri Vikram Singh, R/o Village Kumoli, Post Maikoti, Patwari Kshetra, Maikoti, Tehsil and District Rudrapragag. 2. Jeet Singh s/o Sri Yashpal Singh, R/o Village Kumoli, Post Maikoti, Patwari Kshetra, Maikoti, Tehsil and District Rudraprayag. ……….. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Secretary Van Evam Gram Vikas Vibhag, Uttaranchal, District Dehradun. 2. Public Works Department through its Executive Engineer, District Rudraprayag. 3. District Magistrate, District Rudraprayag, 4. Chief Development Officer, District Rudraprayag. 5. District Planning Director, District Rudraprayag. 6. Union of India through Secretary Ministry of Rural Development, Govt. of India, New Delhi. ……… Respondents ---------------- JUDGEMNT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C. J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Km. Indu Sharma on behalf of Sri Sharad Sharma, Advocate pleads no instructions from the petitioners. Sri U.P.S.Negi, Addl. Advocate General for respondents 1 to 5. Km. Beena Pande, Advocate for respondent no. 6. 2. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. With the above order CLMA No. 1848 of 2004 also stands dismissed for want of prosecution. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 24.08.2006 24.08.2006 A