IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31053 of 2010 1. RAJESHWAR PRASAD YADAV, SON OF CHANDRA BHUSHAN @ CHANDRAMAN RAI 2. TARACHAND YADAV @ TARA CHANDRA PRASAD YADAV, SON OF BASHISTHA RAI BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – MAHADDIPUR, P.S. CHIRAIYA, DISTT. EAST CHAMPARAN AT MOTIHARI ------- PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAJESH KUMAR SINGH, SON OF SRI BAIDYANATH SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – BARAITHA, P.S. CHIRAIYA, DISTT EAST CHAMPARAN AT MOTIHARHI ------- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 01.03.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners have sought quashing of the order dated 5.8.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. III, Motihari, East Champaran, in Sessions Trial No. 62 of 2010 by which he has refused to discharge the petitioners from the liability of the prosecution case. It has been submitted that the petitioners named in the First Information Report were the members of the mob and, therefore, there should have been discharged. Since it is well known that at the stage of charge even if strong suspicion exists against an accused, it is enough material to put him on trial, thus finding no merit in the application, the same is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)