IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 2ND AUGUST 2011 / 11TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 6037 of 2011(D) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL, KOTTIYAM, KOLLAM, KERALA STATE-691571, REP. BY ITS ADMINISTRATOR, SR.FIDAS THOTTAN HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL, KOTTIYAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REVENUE SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 001. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT – 691 001. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, (RDO), KOLLAM P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT – 691 001. 4. THE ADICHALENNUR PANCHAYATH, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 691577, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 5. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 001. ADV. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN FOR R4 SRI.R.REJI FOR R4 SMT.THARA THAMBAN FOR R4 SRI.B.BIPIN FOR R4 SMT.REVATHY P.NAIR FOR R4 GOVT. PLEADER SRI.T.K.ARAVINDAKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 6037 of 2011(D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS PERTAINING TO THE OBSTRUCTIONS AND THE ILLEGAL OCCUPATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF C CLASS BUNK SHOPS IN FRONT OF THE PETITIONER'S HOSPITAL OBSTRUCTING THE PASSAGE TO THE PETITIONER'S HOSPITAL. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DTD.24.1.2011 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.6037 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of August, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a hospital. Aggrieved by the bunk shops that are constructed in front of the hospital, affecting the ingress and egress of the patients and other visitors, they filed Ext.P2 representation to the 2nd respondent, seeking removal of the bunk shop. Orders on the representation have not been passed. It is in these circumstance the writ petition is filed. 2. At this stage, since the aforesaid representation is pending before the 2nd respondent, the grievance of the petitioner will be redressed if the 2nd respondent considers the representation with notice to the affected parties. 3. I heard the learned Government Pleader also. 4. Taking note of the submissions made, I direct that the 2nd respondent, before whom Ext.P2 representation is pending, shall consider the same with notice to those affected parties and pass orders thereon. W.P(C) No.6037 of 2011 2 5. This the 2nd respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. The Writ Petition is disposed of. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ab W.P(C) No.6037 of 2011 3