IN mE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CG) WRIT PETITIGN No. Z415 aw 2004 BETWEEN *AshgkKmEt Nagpure S/o Late Shri Shiv Shanker Rao Nag-pure; wed about 47 years; mcupatian Accountant; postea at District :4 Eaucation Offiaer?’ Raipuri" ms idem: of BadaipaL’ai Raipur? mhsil aw District Raipur (6G). wTI'rlomfw m Nui§i The State «w Chhattisgarh, thmugh the $eeretary, Department a£ School Mucatmn, Mantralay, .K.S. Buildirg, Raipur (CG). me District Education @fficef?‘ Raipur‘i ’Tehsil am District Raipur (06). 11m colleetor; Raipnri Tens 11 an& District Raipur (CG). §EspomEw WRIT yETITmN UNDER ARTICLEs 226/2 A or m consmmmmon oi} m?“ “M.“ v%* ”TWA 7L1 m ” 1 . V XI-HC—22 S—g—20$4 Shri Awadh Tripathi,’ counse1 for the petitioner. / Shri V.V.S.‘ Murthy, Dy Dubey, P.L. for the State. Application for urgent nearing is allowed. Heard. Learned counsel for 1: Accountant whereas he haS he {petitioner submits that the v matter relates to transfer. IWEe further submits that he is an geen posted as per Ann'exure P 1 against the post of Head Clerk, which is a promotional post. He submits that as soon a3 :1 V there, he will be again trans! stated as per Annexure 13—2 tl‘ the petitioner is holding 1S r Clerk is vacant therefore, a P Shri Mnrthy submitte‘ Department concerned and it Adv. General with Shri Sandeep some other Head Clerk is posted erred and the Principal has also lat the post of Accountant which ot vacant and the post of Head lead Clerk be posted. d that he. has written to the 1structions are awaited. Counsel for the petitioner submits that none has been . posted in place of the petitioner. l-le further submits that for the present the petitioner ay be given an opportunity of filing the detailed ‘represe tation before the competent authority of the respondents, Which shall be considered on its own merits in accordance wi h law. \\ \l \\\\ {new — XI-HC-22 mar ma Having considered anc‘ Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in’ the opinion of this Court, for the present ends ofjustice will Hie served if a direction is given to the petitioner to make a detailed representation raising‘his grievances before the competent authority of the respondents along with a copy of the pdtition and this order, within 1‘0 days, and on such representation being filed, the competent authority of the respondents shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible preferably Within six weeks from the V date of receipt of the representation. It is made clear that if any grievance Still remains, the petitioner may hvaii the remedy availabie under the law. ‘ Shri Tripathi submits at pending consideration of th representation, the stay may rbe granted; Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and material on reco d, it is'directed that pending consideration of the represe tation, the transfer order so far as petitioner is concerned, s all remain stayed. With the, aforesaid, ob ervations, this'petition stands disposed oft Consequentiy NLWP. o. 2145/2004 also stands disposed of. C.C. as per rules. Sd/- l Fakhruddin o1}. ‘ Judge [143% éfaa MW Q m‘ e