c '^ ^>.<^- IN THE IIIGHCOURTGFCHHAmSGARHATBILASPUR WRTT PETmON fS) N0. ^2^ OF 2010 PETI'HQNEBS ^y .^ &sty ^ ."^ / .fy/" w \"tl^ RESPONDENTS 1Y / 2. 3. ^ 4. 5. Tikam Smgh Manjhi S/o Shri Nohar Singh MaajU , aged about 24 years, occupation service, posted as Peon , Oovt Middle Sdbool Kurlapara, Block Maiiipur, District Raipur (CG). Belpehan S/o DxirJan Ram Ghsila-adhan, aged about 34 years, occupation service, posted as peon, Oovemment Middle SchQol QudbheU, BIock Mainpur, Distnct Raipur (CG). Oagtieshwgtp S/o Asharam, aged about 35 year, occupatipn service, pos^ed as peon, Govemmenf Middle School Chialna^adar , Bloefe Mampi^, DistrictRaipur(CG). Yashwgmt Kumar S/o Chhotelal, aged about 26 years, oGcupation servtce, workmg as peoti, posted at Oovemment Middle SGhool Nadangttmda, BIock Maixipur, District Raipur(CG), Manohar Lal Yadu S/o Ramdas Yadu, aged about 31 years, occupation service, posted at Govemment Middle School, DhobgiEimal, Block Nainpur, DistrictRaipur(CG). ¥BRSUS /:State of Chhafetisgarli, through Secretary, A<^im Jati/ tousucNt Jati Vika^ Vlbhag, D. K. S. Buildmg Ra^ur, EMst^Gt- Raipur,(C.O.). 2/ The Commissioner , Adim Jati/ Anusuchit Jati Vikas Vibhag, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). 3.^ Assistant Comniissioner, Adivasi Vikas, Raipur (CG). 4. ( The Collector, Adivasi Vikas, Raipur (CG). 5. f Block Development Education Officer, Adivasi Vikas, Block Mainpur, District Raipur (CG). 6. Shri Dainrudhar Poojari, MLA, R/o Vrinda Nawagarh, No. 55, Village Munga Paddar, Post Urmal , Tahsil Mainpur, District Raipur (CG). WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSITITUTION OF INDIA t HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S\ N0.5213 OF 2010 PETITIONERS Tikam Singh Manjhi & Others Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others RESPONDENT (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Advocate forthe respondent No.6. ORDER(QRAL) (Passed on this 23rd day of February, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing forthe petitioners, on instruction, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition on the ground that the petitioners want to approach the respondent authorities in view of the subsequent developments. 2. No objection from other side. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid observations. c>3 ^wn Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge