IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24342 of 2009 NANHE YADAV @ RAM NARAYAN YADAV, son of Late Bisar Yadav, resident of Mahabirganj, P.S. Karpi, District Arwal Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 7.10.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner. Considering the fact that this Court had rejected the prayer for bail of the petitioner earlier on merits as also by also taking into consideration that the petitioner had been absconding for a period of 11 years, this Court even now is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. It would however appear from the report of the trial court that the trial of the petitioner has been segregated on account of absconding of two other co- accused. This Court would therefore direct the trial court that it must take all possible steps to conclude the trial of the petitioner within a period of six months from today. In the event the trial of the petitioner for any reason will not be completed, he will be at liberty to move the trial court and the trial court will have to spell out the reasons for not concluding the 2 trial. Only thereafter the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before this Court. With the aforementioned observation, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/