IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2065 of 2006 1. KRISHNA FOUNDATION, Cantt. Road, Mustafapur, PO & PS Khagaul, Distt. Patna (Krishna Foundation All Round sustainable Development Trust) through its Founder & Chairman of its Governing Body, Krishna Ballabha Sharma, Advocate in person 2. Rastriya Nava Nirman Parishad, Cantt. Road, Mustafapur, PO & PS Khagaul, District – Patna (Registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860) through its Founder & President, Krishna Ballabha Sharma, Advocate in person 3. Krishna Ballabha Sharma, Advocate, Patna High Court, S/o Shri Braja Ballabha Sharma, R/o Cantt. Road, Mustafapur, PO & PS Khagaul, Distt. Patna – 801105, in person…… Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2. The Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat Building, Patna 3. The Secretary to the Govt. of Bihar, Department of Home, Old Secretariat Building, Patna 4. The Secretary to the Govt. of Bihar, Department of Road Construction, Visheshwaraiya Bhawan, Patna 5. The Secretary sto the Govt. of Bihar, Department of Urban Development, New Secretariat Building, Patna 6. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Old Secretariat Building, Patna 7. The District Magistrate, Patna 8. The Sr. Superintendent of Police, Patna 9. The City Superintendent of Police, patna 10. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Patna Sadar, Patna 11. The Superintendent of Traffic Police, Patna ……Respondents ----------- 03- 1.7.2009 Heard Mr. Krishna Ballabha Sharma for the petitioners, and learned Assistant Counsel to Mr. V M K Sinha, learned Standing Counsel no. III. The petitioners seek a direction to the respondent authorities to shift the location prescribed by the State Government for demonstration and sit-down strike from the present venue, i.e. `R’ Block, to a central and spacious place like Gandhi Maidan, to avoid bottleneck in traffic at the former place. This writ petition raises a purely administrative issue, and it will be open to the petitioners to move the appropriate authorities to ventilate their grievances. It is - 2 - made clear that this Court has not applied its mind to the merits of the matter. 2. The writ petition is dismissed. ( S K Katriar ) ( Jyoti Saran ) mrl