IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39992 of 2010 3 9.11.2010 Ram Yash Choubey S/o late Triveni Choubey R/o Village Bahera, PS Kargahar, District Rohtas VERSUS The State of Bihar ------- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has prayed for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 302 and other Sections of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It has been pointed out that a case for murder of her mother by the informant and his men was lodged by the petitioner on the date of occurrence itself whereas the present case has been lodged as a counter case through a complaint petition filed on 18.2.2010 whereas the occurrence is dated 9.2.2010. According to the present case, a shot fired by the petitioner by accident hit his own mother. It appears from the complaint petition of this case that the complainant and his men who had allegedly sustained injuries did not go to the police on the date of occurrence and in fact, claimed to have gone to Banaras for treatment and on return the present case was lodged - 2 - against the petitioner and several other members of his family. In the facts of case, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks, petitioner, Ram Yash Choubey, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Rohtas in connection with Kargahar PS Case No.42 of 2010, subject to conditions laid down under Section 438 (2) CrPC. sk (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)