IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 10100 of 2008 Between: 1 Mandala Lakshmana Rao, S/o. Rama Rao, r/o.Plot No. 153/A, Bhayanagar Society, Opp : KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-72 2 Smt. Korupuri Venkata Varalakshmi, W/o. Venkata Satya Sanyasi Ramana Murthy, R/o. 12-8-236/7/1, Mettuguda, Secunderabad - 17. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Mandal Development Officer, Qutubullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 3 The Executive Officer, (PS, Nizampet Gram Panchayat, Qutubullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 4 Vangari Jeevaratnam, S/o. not known, Yogita Arcade, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. 5 Kodala Venkateswar Rao, S/o. not known, R/o. Vahini Towers, A.S. Raju Nagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. 6 K. Mahipal Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, R/o. 41, Eswar Village, Nizamapet Road, Kukatpally, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No.3,4, and 5 with interfering by obstructing the work of peaceful legally valid construction of the suit schedule premises of the Petitioners in illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the principles of natural justice, though they were having valid permission vide Proceedings No. NZP/CP/298/07-07, dated: 03-08-2007 of the 3rd respondent, Consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 to 6 not to interfere by obstructing the construction of the house building of the Petitioners suit schedule premises plot bearing No. 17/part, 18 and 19/part in Sy.No. 174 and 175 situated in Nizampet Village and Grampanchayat, Qutubullahpur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KARRI SURYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: On 9.6.2009, since none appeared for the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also, even after passing over the matter twice, none appeared for the petitioner. There is no representation. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. Consequently, the interim order granted by this Court on 1.5.2008 shall stand vacated. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.10.6.2009 msv