IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30716 of 2011 Juli Kumari Versus 1.The State Of Bihar 2.Neeraj Kumar son of Late Ram Sevak Singh Resident of village Beladih, P.S.Belaganj, District Gaya ---- For the petitioner : Mr.Shailendra Kumar For the State : Mr.Addl.P.P. ---------------------------------- 02/ 21.09.2011 Heard. The petitioner has come here for cancellation of bail granted to opposite party no.2 Neeraj Kumar in connection with Belaganj P.S.Case No. 60 of 2011 on 03.08.2011 Vide Cr.Misc. No. 25671 of 2011. Neeraj Kumar is one of the named accused in a police case which has been registered for offences under Section 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act on the allegation of demand of dowry. It was submitted on behalf of opposite party no.2 Neeraj Kumar that his relationship with his wife Juli Kumari was strained, so he married with one Nikki Kumari. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the statement 2 with regard to marriage with Nikki Kumari is not correct. In fact, a case under Section 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code was lodged by Arti Kumari that her daughter Nikki Kumari was found missing and it was suspected that the petitioner was instrumental in her disappearance. So it has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that on the basis of wrong submission and without notice to her who was an aggrieved person, opposite party no.2 Neeraj Kumar was granted bail. It appears that Opposite party no.2 Neeraj Kumar was granted bail while he was in custody. He is an accused of a case which has been registered for offences under Sections 498(A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It was a police case and the case was investigated into by the police. Considering the submission on behalf of Neeraj Kumar explaining the circumstances regarding his subsequent marriage with Nikki Kumari, he was granted bail. In any view, it cannot be said that it was a case of misrepresentation of fact. The bail was granted after 3 considering all the above facts, so there is no concealment of fact which has resulted in granting bail. In view of this, I am not inclined to cancel the bail granted to opposite party no.2 Neeraj Kumar. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. However, this court observes that if the petitioner has any grievance regarding subsequent marriage of her husband with Nikki Kumari, she may approach the family court or any other court of competent jurisdiction. Tahir/- (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)