THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.NO.12445 OF 2002 ORDER: This writ petition has been instituted calling in question the right of interference by the respondent – Mandal Revenue Office, Charla Mandal, Khammam District, with regard to the land admeasuring Ac.4-45 cents in R.S.No.44/3 and 46/4, situate at Dosilapally Village, Charla Mandal. This writ petition has been prompted by a notice issued by the Mandal Revenue Officer, Charla, on 15-05-2002, proposing to assess the petitioner in terms of Section 3 of Act No.3 of 1905. According to the learned counsel for the writ petitioner, the Commissioner of Appeals, O/o of the Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, passed Orders through his Proceedings No.L1/118/2001, dated 21-02-2002, rejecting the Revision Petition preferred by him, but however, while issuing the impugned notice, lands falling in Sy.Nos. 44/3 and 64/1, have been wrongly mentioned. The learned Government Pleader for Revenue would submit that mentioning Sy.No.44/3 of an extent of Ac.1-86 cents in the impugned order is a clear error committed inadvertently and, therefore, he seeks permission of this Court for recalling the impugned notice preserving liberty to the respondent to issue a correct and proper notice to the writ petitioner and consider his objections and then pass an appropriate final Order. When once it is pointed out that an error has crept in with regard to the survey number and extent of land, based upon which the impugned assessment is sought to be made, it will not be appropriate to pronounce any opinion on merits. I, therefore, consider it appropriate to set aside the notice bearing date 15-05-2002, issued by the respondent Mandal Revenue Officer, granting liberty to him to make a careful and proper assessment before proceeding any further against the writ petitioner. It is open to the Mandal Revenue Officer to put the writ petitioner on notice, consider his objections and then pass an appropriate Order dealing with the said objections. With this the writ petition is allowed and the impugned notice dated 15-05-2002, is set aside. No costs. --------------------------------- Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J mrk 20th April 2009