IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.12843 of 2011 Date of Decision : July 22, 2011. Joginder Ram .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Mohd.Yousaf, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The joint land in which the petitioner alongwith the private respondents is also a co-sharer, has been ordered to be partitioned vide the impugned orders passed by the revenue authorities concurrently holding that there has to be an equitable distribution of the 'good' and 'inferior' land. Two fold contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners are that (i) a part of the land is gair mumkin abadi and cannot be partitioned by the revenue authorities or that (ii) his exclusive possession where he has constructed a house. ought to have been protected. Both the contentions have not found favour with the revenue authorities. It has been held that there is absolutely no evidence to show that a part of the land is gair CWP No.12843 of 2011 [2] mumkin abadi deh. Similarly, the petitioner cannot deprive his co-sharers from a part of the good land abutting the road merely on the plea that he has raised some construction thereupon. There being a concurrent finding of fact by the authorities below, no interference by this Court in its writ jurisdiction is called for. Dismissed. July 22, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE