IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No. 430 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 21, 2011 Jatinder Kumar. …Petitioner Versus M/s Ganganagar Cloth House. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Sandeep Jasuja, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner is willing to compound the offence and is ready to make payment of the cheque amount along with 10% annual interest and 5% fine as per the dictum of the Apex Court in the matter of Damodar S. Prabhu vs. Sayed Babalal H., reported in 2010(5) S.C.C. 663. On deposit of total amount offered by the learned counsel for the petitioner before the learned Trial Court within 15 days from today, further proceedings before the CRR 430 of 2011 learned Trial Court shall remain stay. On deposit so made, learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to pass appropriate order thereon in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the matter of Damodar S. Prabhu (supra). Disposed of accordingly. February 21, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2