IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. S.A.W. No. 971/2007 Mridul Kumar Vs. LIC of India & Ors. ..... Date of order : 23.4.2010 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SAPRE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr.Dilip Moolchandani for Mr.Shanker Lal Sinwaria,for the appellant. Mr. J.L.Purohit, for the respondent. <><><> Request is made to adjourn the matter on behalf of the counsel for the appellant Mr.Shanker Lal Sinwaria. Looking to the controversy involved in the appeal, we do not wish to adjourn the appeal though prayed. (2) We have perused the record. (3) This is an intra court appeal filed by respondent no. 1 of Writ Petition No.6827/2005 under Article 227 read with Rule 134 of the Rajasthan High Court Rules against an order dt. 06.09.2007 passed by the learned Single Judge in aforementioned writ petition. (4) Admittedly, the impugned order dt. 06.09.2007 is an interim order passed in a pending writ petition. (5) In our view, in such circumstances the proper remedy for the appellant would be to approach the learned Single Judge in a pending writ petition and file appropriate application either for seeking modification of the impugned order or for its setting aside as the case may be and depending upon the facts alleged in their application, the appropriate order can always be passed. Needless to observe, if any such application is made by the respondent no. 1 the same shall be decided in accordance with law by the writ court. (6) It is with these observations and liberty we do not wish to interfere with the impugned order at this stage and dismiss the appeal in limine. (7) We request the learned Single Judge to expedite the hearing of the writ petition on merits. /s.soni./ (DINESH MAHESHWARI ),J. ( A.M.SAPRE ),J.