%1W/\ IN THE HOIfBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR T _. ,W;P.(S) No$$>7¥ 0f 2010 PETITIONER /: Kishore Kumar Nirmalkar, S/o. Late Shri Dwarika Prasad Nirmalkar, aged about 33 years, Assistant Teacher working as Head Master, Government Primmy School, Rawad, Block Fingeshwar, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Versus The State of Chhattisgarh through Secretaly School Education Department Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, G.E.Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) District Education Officer, v‘ Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Smt. Tulika Pandey, wife of not known, Teacher Government Middle School, Pandaritaraee, Block Dharsinva, Distt. Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA § wPwwgg L650 Wm 3mm (Wu) WWW ‘ WWW wmm x} wwwifa‘itm $ai1%ma11%31 r $3 : EEC3N’ELE MR. JESTI$E E’Rl’i‘RIKER EEWAKER i?.§3§.301a - Shri KS. Péwar, counsel for the petitioner. Shn' Ajit Singh, PL. for £16 Stats. Grievance of the petitior‘er is that though the, §st£fionsr has preferred a representatior aggxiaved. by his supersewicn, the sams has not been: (iecid'ed tiEl date. Counsd fmfthe yetiti réihrrsd ta tha gra&ati0n List {axmexure P- 1) from Which it is found that The yetitioney ie p1aced over emd' above the ree oudent No.3. 1t is also stated 3‘11 the petition that the petitioner olds quajjfication of MA,” DEd. and belongs to OBC categ ry. Further contention of the petitioner is that he has ne " 'beelq communicated with 311}? a<iverse remark nor any Dep tmental Enquixy is pending and nil date he has not been puni ed by the depaltment. In View of the averment made in this petin‘on it appears that junior to the petitioner ha been promoteé. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he be yemitted. to withdraw this petition with libexty to file r’presenta‘l’éon before resyontiant N02. He further submits t at almost in similar facts and circumstances, this Court has passed me onion elated 233mm {Annexme as} wtmsy Not 4746;2010 am oonsidei‘ing the said orden the resyon‘ient No.2 may be directeé to decide the represemation of the petitioner inacoordanee with \ G r v .1 s ‘ m' 3] 'i WWW WWW WWW WW amiwwxm 3r is permitted to withdraw this roper representation before the veeks from the date of receipt of t is expected from the competent esentation as texpedittouely as months from the date of receipt )n. Accordiugly, the petitioa petition with libertv to 13k p rsspondent N02 within thrse ‘ copy of thizs order and m tum i authority to decide the repr possiblo prafarably within thres of copy of tho saixi rcpresontam If grievzmcc of the patitio open to fhe petitiorler to wk aVailable to him under the lawt / Sdl— yritinker Diwak¢V Judge [VT wooy: '7 ’ 3am, m) W . E HQLQQX°§ 37266 mm (Wu) WWW ner is not redressed) it. would be e recourse to such remedy as