IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28062 of 2009 1. Shakaldeep Sahani, son of Lachan Sahani, 2. Dinesh Sahani, son of Shakaldeep Sahani, 3. Binod Sahani, son of Beler Sahani, village Babhan Dhawahi, PS Harsidhi, District East Champaran – Petitioners. Vs. The State of Bihar. 2 27.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are accused in a case under sections 420, 406, 120B, 364, 385 and 323/34 of the Penal Code. It is said that the informant’s husband has sold a piece of land to Kai Sahani and petitioners 2 and 3 on 21.1.2008 and after that he could not be located. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the F.I.R. has been lodged after a delay and that these petitioners have no reason to kidnap and do away with the life of informant’s husband. However, since there is an allegation against petitioners no.2 and 3, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to them and their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. As far as petitioner no.1 Shakaldeep Sahani is concerned, there is no allegation against him in the complaint petition. In the circumstances petitioner no.1 Shakaldeep Sahani is directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks, in Harsidhi PS Case No. 04/2009 on furnishing bail bond of rupees ten thousand with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, 2 East Champaran, Motihari, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)