THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 8260 of 2007 Dated: 30.04.2007 Between: V. Vidyavathi. ..... PETITIONER AND The A.P. Residential Educational Institutions Society (registered), rep.by its Secretary, Gagan Vihar, Hyderabad and others. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.8260 of 2007 ORDER Questioning the proceedings dated 07.04.2007, issued by the 2nd respondent, transferring the petitioner as Post Graduate Teacher in Telugu at APR School, Peddapur camp, Karimnagar District from the 1st respondent Society, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. 2. The petitioner was appointed as Post Graduate Teacher on 18.12.1989 in the 1st respondent Society. Thereafter, the 2nd respondent transferred the petitioner from the School at Kalwakurty to K.G.B.Vidyalayas, Narva, and relieved her on 05.10.2006. Aggrieved by the same she filed W.P.No.22132 of 2006, wherein a direction was given to the respondents to transfer the petitioner to a school of 1st respondent within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of the said order. As the respondents have not considered the case of the petitioner, the petitioner filed C.C.No.172 of 2007. The petitioner states that surprisingly, the 2nd respondent has passed the impugned order transferring the petitioner to a School located out side the Zone, even though there are several vacancies within VI Zone. Hence, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Society. 4. During the course of hearing, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submitted that if the petitioner submits any representation, the respondents would consider the case of the petitioner. In view of the said submission, the petitioner submitted representation dated 28.04.2007, giving option to transfer and post her at any of the four places mentioned therein, in view of her health problems. 5. Since the representation dated 28.04.2007 of the petitioner is said to be pending consideration before the respondents, and in view of the stand taken by the learned counsel for the respondents that they would consider the representation, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: The respondents are directed to consider the representation dated 28.04.2007 of the petitioner for transferring her to any one of the four places opted by her in her representation, and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. _______________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 30.04.2007. sj