IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CI-IHA'ITISGARH ATBILASPUR WP. No. 73.912002 PETITIONER Ashok Chandra Modi S/o Hulashman Modi Aged about 45 years R/o Sadar Bazar Rajnandgaon Proprietor of Modi Minergl'sx ' Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS : v . Government of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Mineral Resources Department, Raipur, The Collector, Kanker (C.G.) Government of India, Ministry of Mines Department of Mines Through Secretary, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. Shri M/s. Bhilai Cement PVT; Ltd. Ganj Para, Durg, i Distt. Durg (C.G.) Shri Vishwajeet Singh, Vill. & Post Pandaria ff“ Distt Kawardha (C 3/ RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Particulars of the Petitioner As detailed above in the cause title. ~ W Shri Manoj V Paranjp6, cc unsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay K Agaxwal, Dy. Adv. General for the State. Heami. 1? Admittedly, against the :mpugned order of rejection of his application for prospecting licence, the petitioner hée'a statutory remedy under Section 30 of Mines & Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and therefore, the petitioner should‘avail of that remedy and indeed, this is what has been held in State of Goa Vs Mls A.H. Jaffar and sons reported in AIR 1995 SC 333. Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this writ petition, so as to enable the petitioner to approach the Central Government by way of a revin under Section 30 of the Act. In s‘o " case a revision is preferred \ 1g?! \ or before 13?] January 2003, the same shall be entertained and iforts shall he made to dispose of it \ \ \\ ‘i on merits within a reasonable eriod‘ 175/2002 for interim relief & LA. Consequently, M.W.P. . No. 2 16 1/ 2002 for urgent he are also stand disposed of. i Sd/— P.C.Naik ‘ Judge V i_.__ x3 ‘a [new o' N g ‘ ’