THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO.31543 OF 2011 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed seeking a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not extending the benefits as granted by the Labour Court-III, Hyderabad in I.D.No.83 of 2009, as well as in the Proceeding No.L2/785(254)/09-HCZ, dated 29.11.2010 of the 2nd respondent as illegal, unjust, in violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents to implement the award dated 18.08.2009 passed by the Labour Court-III, Hyderabad, in I.D.No.83 of 2009 and arrange all consequential benefits in the interest of justice. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 3. The case of the petitioner is that he joined in the service of the respondents’ corporation as Driver on 24.3.1992. Subsequently, his services were regularised from 1.10.1994; that suddenly he was kept under suspension on 3.12.1996 which was ultimately culminated in removal from service by the 4th respondent by order dated 25.8.1997; that being aggrieved thereby, the petitioner filed an appeal before the appellate authority, who in turn passed an order directing the petitioner be taken as Driver afresh; that questioning the same, the petitioner filed I.D.No.83 of 2009 (Old I.D.No.89 of 2006) before the Labour Court-III, Hyderabad and the Labour Court passed an award on 18.8.2009 directing the respondents to count the period from the date of suspension the petitioner was taken on duty as Driver afresh as that of continuity of service along with attendant benefits. The Labour court further directed the respondents to implement the said award within one month from the date of publication of the award. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that consequent to the award passed by the Labour Court, the Personnel Officer-I (GHZ) addressed a letter dated 29.11.2010 to the Depot Manager, HCU Depot stating that the Regional Manager (HR) has accorded sanction to implement the award dated 18.8.2009 passed by the Labour Court-III, Hyderabad, in I.D.No.83 of 2009 dated 18.8.2009. He further submitted that even though the award passed by the Labour Court has become final, the same was not implemented by the respondents. Therefore, the petitioner has got issued legal notice to the respondents calling upon them to implement the award passed by the Labour Court, but the respondents having received the same did not comply the same. 5. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that there is no dispute with regard to the fact that the award passed by the Labour Court has become final and consequently the Personnel Officer-I (GHZ) vide his letter dated 29.11.2010 granting permission to the Regional Manager (HR) to implement the award dated 18.8.2009 passed in I.D.No.83 of 2009 by the Labour Court-III, Hyderabad. He further submitted that the respondents may be directed to pass the appropriate orders on the legal notice got issued by the petitioner treating it as his representation. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, especially in view of the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents 3 and 4 to implement the award dated 18.8.2009 passed by the Labour Court-III, Hyderabad in I.D.No.83 of 2009, if not already implemented, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _________________ G.CHANDRAIAH,J 26.12.2011 Gk. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No.31543 OF 2011 DATE:26.12.2011 Gk.