1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1002/2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2613 /2004 (Shantaram Rajeshwar Potdukhe and another vs. Joint Charity Commissioner and another ) ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr M P Khajanchi, Adv. for petitioners Mr Ankar, Adv.h/for Mr S P Bhandarkar, Adv.for respondent No. 2 Mr D M Kale AGP for Respondent No.1 ... CORAM : PRASANNA B.VARALE, J. DATED : APRIL 6, 2010. Heard. 2. It is submitted by the learned Advocates for petitioners and respondent no.1 that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement in terms of the comprehensive compromise, which is incorporated in the Civil Application itself. The joint pursis annexed to the application as Annexure “A” is taken on record and marked “X” for the purpose of identification. In view of the pursis filed by the parties, the learned Joint Charity Commissioner, Nagpur is directed to dispose of the Application No.18/2001 in terms of the joint pursis to be field by the parties. The parties undertake to supply copy of the joint pursis before the Joint Charity Commissioner Nagpur, within one week. 3. The instant Civil Application is allowed in 2 terms of the compromise. 4. In view of the order passed in Civil Application, nothing remains to be decided in the Writ Petition. Writ Petition too is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE sahare