IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. F.A.O. No. M-70 of 2010 ( O&M ) DATE OF DECISION : 19.12.2011 Smt. Anjana Kumari .... APPELLANT Versus Pawan Kumar ..... RESPONDENT CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present: Mr. Puneet Bali, Advocate, for the appellant, with the appellant. Mr. Girish Agnihotri, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate, for the respondent, with the respondent. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) Appellant (wife) has filed an application (CM No. 30139-CII of 2011) to withdraw the appeal, filed by her against the decree of divorce dated 21.1.2010, passed by the District Judge, Family Court, Faridabad. The appellant is seeking withdrawal of the appeal in terms of the amicable settlement arrived at between the parties. Copy of the Settlement Deed dated 25.11.2011 is annexed with the application as Annexure A-1. Both the parties are present in Court today. In terms of the said Settlement Deed, the respondent (husband) FAO No. M-70 of 2010 -2- has handed over four Demand Drafts No. 734232, 734233, 734235 and 734236, each for an amount of ` 5 lacs, issued by the Syndicate Bank, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi to the appellant (wife). This amount of ` 20 lacs is in addition to ` 25 lacs, already paid by the respondent to the wife, as per the settlement. The allegations, levelled by the parties in the divorce proceedings against each other shall be deemed to be withdrawn. In view of above, the application (CM No. 30139-CII of 2011) is allowed, and the appellant is permitted to withdraw this appeal. Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE December 19, 2011 ( PARAMJEET SINGH ) ndj JUDGE