IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No. 62 of 2011 Sharda Sharan Goel ….Revisionist. Versus State of Uttarakhand and another …Respondents. Present : Sri Raman Kumar Shah, Advocate for the revisionist. Sri Nandan Arya, Assistant Government Advocate present for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (oral) The revisionist has challenged the order dated 24.3.2011 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Purola, District Uttarkashi by which the application for discharge for alleged offence under Sections 409 and 420 IPC has been rejected. In other words, formal charges will now be framed against the revisionist. Evidently, this Court finds no good ground for interference in this matter under its revisional jurisdiction, yet it is expected that while charges are framed against the revisionist all the parameters laid down under the Criminal Procedure Code shall be looked into by the Court below. The counsel for the revisionist further states that his personal presence before the court below may be dispensed with. This Court does not find any justification to pass such order, however, it is upto the court concerned to dispose of such an application if it is moved under Section 205 Cr.P.C. in accordance with settled principles of law. With these observations, criminal revision is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 20.4.2011 Avneet