IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.28 of 2011 R.C.Sharma Vs. State of Haryana & others Present: Mr.K.L.Dhingra, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The grievance of the petitioner is that while re-fixing his pension, additional increment, which was allowed to him for adopting short family norms, was not taken into consideration. The petitioner has retired on 30.4.2006. Ever since that date, the petitioner claims to be representing against the non-grant of this additional increment. The petitioner has already filed representations (Annexures P-3 and P-4). Without going into the merits of the controversy, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representations filed by the petitioner preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. January 04, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE