1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4383 OF 2009 IN REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.8389 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 200 OF 2007 Deepak s/o Vithalrao Pawar & another Applicants Versus Vithalrao s/o Madhavrao Pinnalwar & another Respondents Mrs.S.G.Chincholkar, advocate for applicants. Mr.M.D.Godhamgaonkar, advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 14th July, 2009. P.C.: This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 9 months and 15 days occurred in presenting Review Petition. Heard Mrs.Chincholkar, learned Counsel for applicants and Mr.Godhamgaonkar, learned Counsel for Respondent No.2. For the reasons stated in the application, application deserves to be allowed and same is accordingly allowed. Delay occurred in presenting Review Petition stands condoned. Civil Application stands disposed of. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/ca438309 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.8389 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 200 OF 2007 Deepak s/o Vithalrao Pawar & another Petitioners Versus Vithalrao s/o Madhavrao Pinnalwar & another Respondents Mrs.S.G.Chincholkar, advocate for petitioners. Mr.M.D.Godhamgaonkar, advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 14th July, 2009. P.C.: Learned Counsel appearing for respective parties have informed that the parties have arrived at a settlement in the matter and they propose to approach appropriate forum for recording compromise or settling the terms. Parties may take recourse to appropriate proceedings. Review Petition does not call for any consideration. Review Petition is accordingly rejected. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/ca438309