SiNteLfc SIK^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION No. J?Q /2006 ^. t> PETITIONER ..^•^?y- ^sy^ ^^ii^-^ ^€^'" Ravindra Kum.ar Upadhyay, S/o. Shri S.K.Upadhyay, age 51 years, Inspector P.S. Pakhanjur, Distt. Kanker (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1 ^cPf1 ^^ ^v'' State of C.G. through Secretary, Deptt. of Home, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The S.P.Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) M // WRIT PETITION UNDER_ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY PROHIBITION AND ANY OTHER WRIT /ORDER/DIRECTION. Xi-HC-22 an^iqir W\* sn^i s^iflch ^n^? (', - AT. -sqRi^q. ©^irms.Tagra'i7 ^^'^go/o^ t'Wt. 311^1 ^RIIW "Bl?g Shri Praveen bas,counselforj the petitioner. Shri Sushi! Dubey, 60vt. Adv^icate for the State. 3y this petition under Articl^ the petitioner is chalienging .the a<(tion of the respondent aythorities whereby he has not been relieved i issued in his favour on two occa' ^^i^l^i'-i ?3HcTf ^ 'fe^f '^'fe^R' q7 3:if:gi['3n^i 226 of the Constitution of India, ^ispite of the transfer orders being feions. The contention is tho,t vide Annexure-P/1 the petitioner has ^een transferred from Karsker to Ranjnand9aon, but the petitioner )ias not been relieyed. Thereafter omother order dated 27-10-2005 tpcmsferring the p^titione" to Raij (Annexure-P/2) hcs been issued by |ur, but once again he has not been reiieved. Learned counsel submifs that since a long perio.d the petitioner is serving in naxaiite are^and made se'.'erai requests before the resoondent No.2 for his re decision of .this Court rendered in •the case of Gautatn Singh aahu_vs_, Learned counsel appearing -flor the State is not in a position to dispute the aforesaid fact- . Havinq considered the facfs and circumstances df the case, material on record,in yiew of the fransfer orders the petitioner has^ ievino. fteiisnce is placed upon a fact that insoite of issuance of two not been retieved and also the fact [^tRg^i 3-HC-22 'S^ "^IPTRTT. cSir-H'liS. WW' "'•°ETF°ST? ^R^TMIS^f^ sn^i'^i R-ii'* sv^y sb^l't •SfsS Y-... an^i^RnwHfta 2-r <t!J-<[d<fl^f 'qprai •?ft^ •fe^H ^•sTRwan^T that the transfer order dated:27 w»; yet been cancelled or' modified, it i; «" ' comply with the order dated 27-i! the petitioner as early as possible dgys from the date of receipt/prod made ciear that if any grieyance st the remedy available under the law. With ' the aforesaid obi disposed of. Consequentiy, I.A.No.2439/2^ Certified copy as per ru]es. •10-2005 (Annexure-P/2) has not directed that the resoondents to -2005 (Annexure-P/2) and relieve preferabiy within a period of 1! iction of copy of this order. It is ! remains, the petitioner may avail sryations the petition stanos 06also stands disposed of. Sdi'- Fakhruddin Judge [«^te^