IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.18082 of 2011 Date of Decision: September 26, 2011 Som Nath & another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.R.S.Longia, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Already this court had passed an order for considering the case of the petitioners for regularisation. Instead the petitioners were served an order dated 30.7.2004 (Annexure P-1). Against that, the petitioners approached the Labour Court and the case was disposed of on the basis of a compromise. The petitioners have again filed this petition seeking regularisation. No policy has been referred to vide which the petitioners are entitled to regularisation. The petitioners, if so advised, may approach the respondents. No case for issuing any direction for regularisation is made out, especially in view of law laid down in Secretary, State of Karnataka & others Vs. Uma Devi (3) & others, 2006(4) SCC 1. Dismissed. September 26, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE