IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2009 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1931 RCRev..No. 515 of 2005() ------------------------ RCA.60/2001 of I ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, TRIVANDRUM RCP.7/2000 of MUNSIFF COURT,ATTINGAL .................... REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/CR.PETITIONER,. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ANIL, S/O.THANKAPPAN, SASTHAMPADICKAL, THOTTAVARAM, ATTINGAL DESOM, ATTINGAL VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.R.S.KALKURA SRI.HARISH GOPINATH RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANT/PETITIONER. ------------------------------------ VASUDEVAN NAIR, S/O.NARAYANA PILLAI, KAVITHA, MARKET ROAD, ATTINGAL, AVANAVANCHERRY VILLAGE. ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR (COVEATOR) THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ R.C.R.No.515 OF 2005 ------------------------ Dated this the 24th day of March, 2009 ORDER Pius C.Kuriakose, J. It is submitted by Sri.R.S.Kalkura, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri.Pirappancode V.S.Sudheer, learned counsel for the respondent that the issues between the landlord and the tenant have been sorted out between them and a fresh rental arrangement has been entered into and that the tenant has been permitted to continue to occupy the premises on the basis of the said fresh rental arrangement. 2. We accept the above submission of the learned counsel and set aside the order of eviction passed in this case and permit the revision petitioner to continue as a tenant of the building in question on the basis of the fresh rental arrangement admittedly entered into in respect of the building. The R.C.R is disposed of as above. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE dpk