1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 49 of 2008 STATE & ORS. V/S DARSHAN LAL Mr. RISHI VAISHNAVA,AGA, for the appellant / petitioner Ms. SHAILJA PARIHAR for Mr. LS JODHA, for the respondent Date of Order : 5.3.2008 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI DEO NARAYAN THANVI,J. ORDER ----- Learned Single Judge has passed the impugned order on the basis of larger Bench judgment of this Court in State of Rajasthan Vs. Farooq Ahmed reported in 2005(1) WLC (Raj.)-1. It is contended by the learned counsel that in view of Rule 4(c) of the Rajasthan Land Revenue (Land Records) Rules, 1957 the eligibility condition for the appointment of patwari is obtaining certificate from Patwar School, and since in the present case the writ petitioner had obtained the certificate by appearing in the examination on 28.10.1977, he could not claim computation of 9, 18, 27 years of service from the date of initial appointment being dt. 12.9.1975, and that this point was not raised in Farooq Ahmed's case. 2 We have considered the submissions, and find that the writ petitioner was appointed as Irrigation Patwari, and it is not shown under the Rules framed for Irrigation Department there is any such requirement. The requirement of Rule 4(c) appears in Rajasthan Land Revenue (Land Records) Rules, 1957, and the writ petitioner had been sent to Revenue Department as late as on 18.1.2001. As such, we do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( DEO NARAYAN THANVI ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /sushil/