IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.125 of 1986 SUIT NO.125 of 1986 SUIT NO.125 of 1986 The Hukumchand Mills Ltd & Another ..Plaintiffs versus P. Agarwal ..Defendant. Mr. Shailesh Khatri i/b. Bankim Desai & Co. for the Plaintiff Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 23rd Nov., 2005 Dated : 23rd Nov., 2005 Dated : 23rd Nov., 2005 P.C. 1. The learned Advocate for the Plaintiff submtis that they are not receiving instructions from the Plaintiff and the correspondence to the Plaintiff has come back unserved and according to him probably the company has been closed. Under the circumstances, as the Plaintiffs are absent, the suit is dismissed for default. 2. No order as to cost. (S.R.Sathe, J.)