IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42155 of 2010 1. KAPIL YADAV 2. DILIP YADAV-----PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 26.3.2011 Heard counsel for the petitioners and the State. Two petitioners Kapil Yadav and Dilip Yadav are apprehending their arrest in connection with Gaya Sadar Mofussil P.S. case No. 113 of 2010 registered for offence under Section 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation in the First Information Report is that Raju Yadav along with other accused persons kidnapped Soni Devi, wife of the informant while she was going to her Maika with Rs. 30,000/-. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the prosecution case is falsified considering the filing of the complaint case No. 2086 of 2010 by Soni Devi against her husband under Sections 323,341,498A of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It has also been stated that Raju Yadav, who is alleged to have illicit relationship with the wife of the informant, has already been granted anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. No. 3055 of 2011. 2 Considering this fact prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioners Kapil Yadav and Dilip Yadav is allowed. Petitioners above named in the event of their arrest/surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM, Gaya in Gaya Sadar Mofussil P.S. case No. 113 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. A. Kumar ( Mridula Mishra, J.)