1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3514 OF 2004 M/s.Kalpataru Properties (Thane) Pvt. Ltd. ..Petitioner. Vs. M/s.Aessen Private Limited ..Respondent. .... Mr.Vivek Kumar i/b Mr. Anirudha Surte for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent. .... CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. J. J. 16th March, 2006. P.C. : Counsel appearing for the Petitioner fairly placed on the record the order dated 13th April, 2005 passed in companion Writ Petition 3510 of 2004 preferred by the Petitioner. By the order of the Learned Single Judge D.K.Deshmukh, J. the Petition which is directed against an interlocutory order 2 came to be dismissed. The Learned Additional District Judge, Thane has in the present case furnished cogent reasons for dismissing the appeal preferred by the Petitioner against an interlocutory order of the Trial Court. The order of the Additional District Judge does not call for interference under Article 227 having regard to the limited parameters of the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court. The Petition is accordingly dismissed.