1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 138 OF 2008 Ayaz M. Shaikh Saheb & Ors. ... Petitioners Versus The Chief Executive Officer, Slum Rehabilitation Authority, & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Uday Bobde i/by Mr. Shyam M. Sthalekar for the petitioners Mr. J.G. Reddy for Respondent No.1 Mr. H.S. Anand for Respondent No. 5 Mr. Pradeep Jadhav, Assistant Government Pleader, for Respondent No.6 CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and S.A. BOBDE, JJ. DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 2008. P.C.:- The petitioners' grievance is that though they have been held eligible in the year 2000 for permanent accommodation in terms of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Clearance, Improvement and Re-develop- ment) Act, 1971, but the developer has changed, and on the new developer coming into picture, the names of the petitioners are not found in the list of eligible persons. 2 2. Respondent No. 5 has filed affidavit dated 5th February, 2008, who, appearing through Advocate Mr. Anand, contends that all of the petitioners, except petitioner No.1, were qualified and eligible to get the permanent accommodation, and the Society has no objection to allot permanent accommodation to those petitioners. He, however, clarifies that as far as petitioners No. 7, 12 and 14 are concerned, the eligibility has been made in favour of their respective mothers / fathers. 2. Since respondent No. 5 has conceded allotment of permanent accommodation to petitioners No. 2 to 15, we do not think that any further orders are necessary to be passed; but he contended that petitioner No. 1 was not entitled, who may take recourse to any other legal remedy that may be available to him. 3. Petition is disposed of. BILAL NAZKI, J. S.A. BOBDE, J.