Appellants m \ }\ .S HiGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEVGUPTA, CJ. HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J. Misc. Appeal No. 473 of 2003 1. Sumitra, widow of late Sukhnandan Singh, by caste Gond, aged about years. 2. Ku. Malti, D/o. Late Shri Sukhnandan Singh, caste Gond,aged about 3 years (minor) through : naturat guardian i.e. appe!lant No.1 (mother); 3. Ekkawan Singh, son of late Shri Sukhnandan Singh, caste Gond, aged about 2 years (minor) through : natural guardian i.e. appellant No.1 (mother) 4. Thakur Singh, son of Shri Lakhu Singh, caste Gond, aged about 59 years. 5. Indraso, wife of Shri Thakur singh, caste: Gond, aged about 55 years. All are resident of village Sambalpur, Police Station Jainagar, distt. Surguja (Chhattisgarh) Versus 1 The New India Insurance Company Limited, through its Branch Manager, Branch Office, Station Road, Robertsganj, Distt. Sonbhadra, (Uttar Pradesh) Resoondents (Insurer of the vehicle No. U.P. 65 H | 5002) i ] i :i Smt. Prabhukha Devi, (Smt. Pramuktia Devi) wife of Shri Rambali MishraJ Chopan Road, Dala, P.0. Dala, diSttl Sonbhadra (Uttar Pradcsh) | jll (Owner of the vehicle No; U.F'. 65'}-lii 5002) C lj; Durga Prasad Gond, son of Shri Jai Prasad Gond, aged about 30 years, resident of viltage - Salkhan, P.S. Chopan, distt. Sonbhadra (Uttar Pradesh). (Driver of the vehicle No. U.P. 65 H 5002) Misc. Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act Present: Shri Sushii Dubey, learned counsel for the appellants. Shri Shreekumar Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Anand Gupta, learned counsel for respondent No.1. l None for respondents No.2 & 3 thbugh seroed, ORDER (28th April, 2010) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. The appellants are seeking enhancement of ^the compensation awarded by the Second Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Surajpur, District Surguja (for short, 'the Tribunal') vide award dated 07.03.2003, passed in Claim Ciase No.92/2002. 2) The appellants/claimants, unfortunate widow, (njnor children and parents of deceased Sukhnandan Singh, claiijned 1 compensation of Rs.46,84,000/- by fiiing a claim petition Utjider Section 166 of the Motor Vehictes Act, for his death in the niJQtor accident on 22.07.2002. 3) . The Tribunal on a close scrutiny of the entireevidenis leid <:j1 before it held that deceased Sukhnandan Slngh died on ac|c^unt r MHU-<ni«U!«!>Tn tN ! ^pi^iuoou! S4} Suissssse ui psjjs seq leunqyi sqt 'teitt peuiLuqns |s}ue||sddB eqi jcy issunoo psujeai 'AeqnQ |iL)sns UMS (9 i i ['^usiuAed |enpep siep 94} ||i} uoniied LUIBIO syuo Buiiyp 3)ep aijlli.uo^ uinuue jed %^. @ -/OQO'9S'Z'sy jo uoiiesusduuoo ^o lupoijue sAoqe 94} uo issjsiui ^o tusiuAed pepejip jsqyn.! |eunqui 9111 •tuspiooe JOIOLU BLJ} ui 46013 UBpueuy>|ns psseaosp p L|}B3P 9MI JO^ StUELUie|0 SI<1 0} uo]}BSU3dLuoo SB -/OOO'QZ'Z'sy 10 1 r uihs |e}0( e pspjeMB |eunqui su^ 'speaL) jsyio jspun -/OOO'SI-'sy .tOfiuns jsqyn^ BUIPJBAAB Ag '-/QOO'Ql.'Z'sy ot (no p9>|jo SGAA uoflesusdtuoo 941 'QI, p J9i|djt|niu ai^ LJ}!AA -/ooo'ZI-'sy .(o Aouepusdsp |enuue 8L|} 6u!A|du|niu Ag 'uinuuB jed -/OOO'ZL'sy }e psssssse SEM Aouepusdsp .siueLuieio SL|} 'sesusdxs ieaosjsd si4 spje/AO} psseeosp 34} jo SLUooui 34} ^o ^fi, Buipnpsp Ag 'Lunuue Jsd -/ooO'Bl.'sy pue qiuoai jsd -/OOS' I'sy }B peseaoep 341 p aujooui sy} psssesse leunqui syi (9 •Atjieuy psuieue 3AEi| 'MOU leunquii SIQ Aq pepjoo&i sfiuipuy SAoqe aqi 'PJBMB 94} isure6e |e9dde Aue p3|it }ou eAey siuspuodssj sqi sv (^ •stUBLUieio 941 o} uojiesusdujpo Aed ot eiqeiisBM AuedLUOo eouBjnsui SL)} 'peiiiun Aueduuoo souejnsu] eipu| M9N 94) 4im pejnsui SBM tuspiooe ay} p 3}Bp SIQ uo >|omi s|0!4SA Buipusyo 94} se 'ZQOQ/H 99 dn'ON uoiiejtsiDBj Suyesq >|omi eioiqsA Buipusyo eq} p jsAup 34} ^o BuiAup }ua6i|6su pue L|sej o} enp pajjnooo luspiooe 941 'ZOOZ'ZO'ZZ uo }U9piooe JOIOLU aq} ui LUiq Aq psuieisns ssunfu! syi p .,.-.,1..1. the deceased at Rs.18,000/- per annum only; and in awarding low compensation of Rs.2,28,000/- only. 7) Shri Shreekumar Agrawa!, learned Senior counsel with Shri Anand Gupta, learned counsel for respondent No.1 the New India Insurance Company Limited, onthe other hand supported the award and contended that, the compensation of Rs.2,28,000/- awarded by the Tribunal is just and proper compensation in the facts and circumstances of the present case. 8) True, the claimants pleaded that deceased Sukhnandan Singh used to earn Rs.6,000/- per month as driver, theevidence led in that behalf was not of clinching nature. The emplpyer of the deceased was not examined before the Tribunal to establish the income of the deceased to the extent of Rs.6,000/- per month. 9) Nevertheless, the income of the deceased assessed by the Tribunat at Rs.1,500/- per month and Rs.18,000/- per annum in the year 2002 is certainly on the lower side. 10) In our considered opinion, deceased Sukhnandan Singh being aged about 26 years could have easily eamed Rs.80-85/- per day even by working as an un-skiiled labour. We, therefore, propose to re-compute the compensation taking the incomie the deceased at Rs.2,500/- per month and Rs.30,000/- annum. niiBinttaiat"""^~*ui of 11) By deducting the usual 1/3rd of Rs.30,000/- towards the personal expenses ofthe deceased, the claimants' dependency is assessed at Rs.20,000/- per annum. 12) Considering the age of the deceased, his widow, children and parents, we are of the opinion, that multiplier of 15 would be appropriate in the present case. 13) By multiplying the annualdependency of Rs.20,000/- with the multiplier of 15, the compensation works out to Rs.3,00,000/-. The ciaimants are further entitled to receive Rs.5,000/- towards funeral expenses; Rs.5,000/- for loss of estate; and Rs.5,000/- for loss of consortium to the widow. The claimants, thus, become entitled to receive total sumof Rs.3,15,000/- as compensation for the dsath of deceased Sukhnandan Singh in the motor accident. 14) Learned counsel for the parties submitted that with a view to avoid any possible dispute between the parties about the period for which the claimants are entitled to receive interesf on the enhanced amount of compensation, the amount of interest on the enhanced amount of compensation may be quantified in this appeal itself. 15) Considering all the relevant factors including the delay in disposal of the claim petition and the present appeal and the fact that Insurance Company alone is npt to be blamed for the entire delay in the matter, we quantify the amount of interest on ithe enhanced amount of comoensation of Rs.87.000/- at Rs.8,000/-. .il.-;S,. subbu 16) For the foregoing reasons, the appeal filed by the appellants/ claimants for enhancement of the compensation is allowed in part. The compensation of Rs.2,28,000/- awarded by the Tribunal is enhanced to Rs.3,15,000/- with further quantified amount of interest of Rs.8,000/- on the enhanced amount of compensation of Rs.87,000/-. 17) Respondent No.1 The New India Insurance Company Limited is granted three months' time for depositing the total sum of Rs.95,000/- (Rs.87,000/- towards enhanced amount of; compensation + Rs.8,000/- towards quantified amount of interesti on the enhanced amount of compensation of Rs.87,000/-) before the concerning Claims Tribunal. 18) No order as to costs. sd/- Chief Jusdce Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar re