IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7831 of 2011 OM PRAKASH, SON OF LATE DR. NAND KUMAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHANDMARI, P.S. SHAHPUR(DANAPUR), DISTRICT PATNA. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, PATNA. 5. THE DISTRICT ACCOUNTS OFFICER, PATNA. 6. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, BIRCHAND PATEL MARG, PATNA. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 3.5.2011. Heard Shri Mukesh Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Vivekanand Kuwar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.6/Accountant General. None appeared on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 5/State of Bihar. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 31.7.2007 as Assistant Teacher, has prayed for quashing an order whereby his pension was fixed. The petitioner has further prayed for quashing of consequential order issued by the Accountant General vide Annexure-4 to the writ petition. It has been claimed by the petitioner that while revising the pension, the authority concerned has not included one increment and, accordingly, the pension 2 has been fixed on the lower scale. On perusal of the writ petition, it appears that petitioner has not represented before the authority concerned raising his grievances. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned for the grievances, which has been raised in the present writ petition. In view of the facts and circumstances, the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed. The writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a proper representation before the authority concerned. If such representation is filed, it is expected that same will be examined in its right perspective without any delay. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)