Civil Revision No.2320 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2320 of 2009(O&M) Date of Decision: September 07, 2009 Gyanender and others ...... Petitioners Versus Mrs. Vimlesh and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.Ashok Tyagi, Advocate for the petitioners. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This revision petition has been filed against an order allowing amendment of the plaint. The respondents had earlier filed a suit claiming that they had been put in possession by virtue of an agreement to sell and seeking a prayer to restrain the petitioners from dispossessing them. As per the respondents during the pendency of that suit date for execution of sale deed had also arrived and thus they had become entitled to file a suit for specific performance. It is that amendment which has been challenged by way of this revision petition. Learned trial court has rightly found that on the date when the amendment was allowed the respondents would, in any case, have the right to pray for withdrawal of the pending suit with permission to file a fresh one Civil Revision No.2320 of 2009 2 on the subsequent cause of action and that on that date the suit for specific performance was within limitation. In these circumstances the prayer for amendment which has been allowed does not suffer from any such material irregularity so as to justify interference by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Consequently this revision petition is dismissed. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE September 07, 2009 sunita