IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.19459 -M of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : OCTOBER 18, 2011 DAULAT RAM & ORS. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. KB Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate, for Mr. MS Bajwa, Advocate, respondent No.2. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 This petition has been filed under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, praying for quashing of FIR No.180 dated 12.05.2010 under Sections 406, 420, 120-B, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Sadar Amritsar, District Amritsar City (Annexure P- 1), on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2). 2 Vide order dated 18.4.2011, the parties were directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate, so as to verify the factum of compromise. Report dated 6.7.2011 has been received from Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Amritsar, which is to the effect that the complainant gave the statement that compromise has not been effected and the accused had obtained an affidavit from the complainant, under influence, on blank papers. Criminal Misc. No.19459 -M of 2010 2 3 Learned counsel for respondent No.2-complainant; namely, Chander Mohan, states that, in fact, there is no compromise between respondent No.2 and the petitioners/accused. 4 This court is of the considered opinion that because the stand of the complainant is that the disputes have not been settled by way of compromise, no orders to quash the FIR on the basis of compromise, can be passed. 5 The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. OCTOBER 18, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?