[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.4211 OF 2007 Sandip Barku Bhosale ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Ms.Prabhu Badadare Advocate for Applicant Mr.Rajesh More A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : MARCH 18, 2008 DATE : MARCH 18, 2008 DATE : MARCH 18, 2008 IN CHAMBER AT 2.40 P.M. IN CHAMBER AT 2.40 P.M. IN CHAMBER AT 2.40 P.M. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the Applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The Applicant is seeking bail in CR No. 595 of 2006 of Mulund Police Station. The said case is mainly under Sections 302 and 307 of IPC. 3. The learned APP on instructions states that the trial has commenced. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to grant bail at this stage. In [-2-] case the trial is not completed by 31st May, 2008, the liberty is granted to the Applicant to prefer a fresh application for bail. 4. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]