1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 109 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri N.V. Walawalkar, Sr. Counsel i/by Shri J.G. Aradwad (Reddy) for the Petitioner. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 13th January 2010. P.C.: . Heard learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Petitioner. An Application under Rule 1 of Order XI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 made by the Petitioner/Plaintiff has been rejected by the impugned order. One of the grounds on which the application has been rejected is that by the said application, leave of the Court was sought to deliver interrogatories after the Petitioner has filed the affidavit in lieu of evidence of its first witness. 2. The order impugned is purely an interlocutory order. At this stage, when the affidavit in lieu of the evidence is already filed, no case is made out for 2 interference in writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The Petition is rejected on the ground that the impugned order is interlocutory in nature. (A.S.OKA,J)