IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1653 of 2011 SUBODH KUMAR, Son of Shri Bimal Singh, resident of village Lilo P.S. Pakri Brawa, District Nawada Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Govt. of Bihar at Patna 2. The District Magistrate, Nawada at Nawada, P.s. and Distt. Nawada 3. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Nawada at Nawada, P.S. and Distt. Nawada 4. The Executive Engineer, Pradhan Mantri Sarak Sampark Yojna, Nawada, P.S. and District – Nawada …. Respondents ----------- 2 27.01.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in public interest the petitioner, the concerned Mukhiya, has preferred this writ petition for explaining the true import of judicial order passed by this Court contained in Annexure 1, whereby a writ petition preferred by three villagers was disposed of on 23.7.2010 giving opportunity to the authorities to reconsider whether any land could be acquired for constructing new road under the Pradhan Mantri Sarak Sampark Yojna in village Kabala in the district of Nawada. It has been shown to us from Annexure 2 that a contempt application has also been filed in this Court by the petitioners of the earlier writ petition and some 2 earth work for laying out a link road is now sought to be demolished with a view to avoid action for contempt. Considering the entire facts and circumstances we are of the view that petitioner as a Mukhia may seek opinion whether he is aggrieved person and can file a review petition or an appeal against the order contained in Annexure 1. It is not deemed fit and proper to interfere in the matter through an independent writ petition by way of Public Interest Litigation. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Spd/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)