IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 3526 of 2008 Between: 1 Poidamekala Venkamma W/o. China Venkata Subbbaiah 2 Thodeti Suresh S/o. Late Seshaiah rep. by its their Maternal grand Mother/next friend 1st petitioner herein. 3 Thodeti Venkatesh, S/o. Late Seshaiah rep. by its their Maternal grand Mother/next friend 1st petitioner herein All the petitioners are R/o.Vaka Village,H/o. Karedu, Ulavapadu[M], Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 State of Andra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary to Revenue Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3 Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur, Prakasam District. 4 Tahsildar, Ulavapadu Mandal, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in insisting the petitioner to vacate from the land of Ac.0.69 cents covered by Survey Number 41/1 of Karedu Village without acquiring the same following due process of law as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and offends Article 14, 21 and 30-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent not to insist the Petitioners to vacate from the land of Ac.0.69 cents covered by Survey Number 41/1 of Karedu Village without acquiring the same and without paying compensation in accordance with law and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court at the stage of admission made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the petitioners work out their remedies in the civil Court. Permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. No costs. N.V.RAMANA,J DT24.6.2008 msv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 Principal Secretary to Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3 Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur, Prakasam District. 4 Tahsildar, Ulavapadu Mandal, Prakasam District. 5 2CCs to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad (OUT). 6 2CD copies