IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 30TH JANUARY 2009 / 10TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 3198 of 2009(E) ------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- ESSA.K.M,AGED 58, S/O.MOIDEEN, KAKKATTU VEEDU, H.NO.1/272,EDAVANAKKAD.PO, NORTH PARUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNA MENON SRI.M.JITHESH MENON RESPONDENT: --------------- THE SECRETARY,REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.SUDHADEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ----------------------------- W.P.(C) No.3198 of 2009 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT By Exhibit P2 proceedings of the R.T.A, Ernakulam, the petitioner was granted a regular permit subject to settlement of timings. Petitioner states that timings have not been settled so far. It is also stated that in the meanwhile, petitioner offered a new vehicle as per Exhibit P4 and that also is kept pending. Taking into account these complaints, the respondent is directed to settle the timings pursuant to Exhibit P2 and issue the permit, taking into account the new vehicle offered by the petitioner as per Exhibit P4. Petitioner contends that till now he has been operating the vehicle on the strength of a temporary permit and Exhibit P6, the last temporary permit is valid till 21/01/2009. It is stated that as the period of validity of Exhibit P6 was expiring, he made Exhibit P7 application for reissue of the temporary permit and that orders have not been passed. In view of this grievance of the petitioner, the respondent is directed to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P6. Orders shall be passed by the W.P.(C) No.3198/2009 2 respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within two weeks of production of copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE scm