HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT WRIT PETITION No.2845 OF 2009 ORDER: The petitioner prays for Mandamus declaring the inaction of respondents in disposing of representation dated 03.02.2009 and preventing the 6th respondent from blocking the passage of petitioner and neighbouring farmers in Survey Nos.212 and 213 in Narasappagudem Hamlet of Gandamwariguda Village, Nalgonda Mandal and District, as illegal, contrary to right to movement, right to life and property. The petitioner claims to be owner and possessor of an extent of Ac.5-00 in Survey Nos.212 and 213 of Narasappagudem Hamlet of Gandamwariguda Village. From the representation dated 03.02.2009, the grievance is that the 6th respondent is undertaking construction or developing the lands into a layout in Survey Nos.212 and 213 of Narasappagudem Hamlet of Gandamwariguda and causing obstruction to the right of ingress and egress the petitioner has through Survey Nos.212 and 213 . I have considered the material available on record and also the grievance set out in representation dated 03.02.2009. In the opinion of this Court, the averments in the representation do go to show that the petitioner claims to have right of passage through survey Nos.212 and 213 of Narasappagudem Hamlet of Gandamwariguda Village and the 6th respondent is unauthorisedly either obstructing or by constructing a compound wall preventing the petitioner from enjoying her right. In the opinion of this Court the grievance is a pure and simple civil dispute between the petitioner and the 6th respondent. If the petitioner has a right recognised either in law or on facts/revenue records, the petitioner has to work out comprehensive reliefs in a properly instituted suit or proceeding. By giving liberty to the petitioner to work out the remedies as indicated above, the writ petition is dismissed, as the dispute is a civil dispute. No order as to costs. This Court is not inclined to consider the limited prayer to direct the respondents to dispose of the representation said to have been made on 03.02.2009 as ultimately it is for competent court to decide the rights. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ________________ S.V. BHATT, J Date:12.11.2014 Stp