M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 599 of2308 1’ETITIONERS : 1. Ishwar Prasad Sahu, aged about 38 years, son of Late Shri Govind Ram Sahu, working asASsistant Teacher — Government Primary School — Filokatpam, Mohra, Biock Bilha, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) (S1. N0. 7 in the Annexure P-l) W WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTETUTION OF INDIA SB: Eon’ble Shri Satish K. Agjigog'z J. PreSent: 2. 1’avan Kumar ?ate1, aged about 39 years, son of Shri Lachchiram Patel, working as — Assistant Teacher, Janpad Primary Schoo} ~— Lofandi, Block — Bilha, Distt. Bilaspur (CG) (Sl.no. 9 in the Annexure P-l) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Education Dan Kalyan Sing}; Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. The Dist. Education Ollicer, Dim. Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 Block Education Officer, Block Bilha, Distt. Bilaspur (CG) RESPONDENTS Shri Kunal Das, Advocate for the petiiioners. Shri Ale}: Bakshi, Government Advocale for the State/respondents. , 5)». ORAL ORDER (Passed on“17—“ 30 day of January, 2008) The petitioners was appointed on 01.07.1995 on probation for a period of two years as Assinant Teacher on a fixed pay of Ks. 1200/-. After completion ofhis probation, they were granted regular pay scale. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the, case is asto Whether, the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial apnointment or after r completion of probation period. Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present Writ petition are squarely covered by the decision of this Conit in the case of Har Prasad Kurre and others vs. State af Clihatz‘isgarh and others (Writ Petition (S.) No.519l of2006), dated 3.10.2006. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petition §s disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Har Prasmi Kurre and others vs. State afChham'sgarh and oihers (Supra). The petitioners are allowed to make a representation within a period of two weeks from today to respondent No.1, raising all their gievances and, in turn, respondent No.1 shall decide the said representation in an objective manner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of such representation, aner considering ail the points raised by the petitioners and taking into account the order dated 3 1-1-2300 passed by the learned State Administrative Tribunal in Original Application No.1452 of 1998, and ifthe petitioners stand on the same footings, as the petitioners in the Original Application No. 1452 of 1998, then they be also sanctioned the same pay-scale and seniority, The Writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid direction: subject to verification ofthe facts. No order as to costs. Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri: Judge /