IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11347 of 2002 PRABHAT KUMAR & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 4.3.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The challenge in this application relates to an order of termination from the work charge establishment dated 14.1.2002. The petitioners were initially appointed as a daily wager and came to be absorbed in the work charge establishment. Learned counsel for the parties are not at issue that similar matters which travelled from the Division Bench were referred to a committee constituted by the State Government in C.W.J.C. NO. 7359 of 2002 and analogous cases disposed on 13.7.2006 reported in 2006(2), PLJR 396. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on consideration by the committee petitioner nos. 2 and 3 have already been reappointed and case of the petitioner no. 1 is pending consideration. The writ application has, therefore, become infructuous with regard to petitioner nos. 2 and 3 and the writ application of petitioner no. 1 now becomes premature in view of the changed circumstances. The Court holds and trusts that committee shall take decision in accordance with law with regard to petitioner no. 1 also. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)