IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.3337 of 2009 Date of decision:14.01.2011. Babu Singh ...Petitioner Versus Ravinder Verma ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Ms. Poonam R. Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gulam Nabi Malik, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is filed by the petitioner/landlord against the orders of the Courts below by which his application for ejectment of the respondent/tenant from the demised premises, has been dismissed. The only bone of contention is the interpretation of the rent note in which it is mentioned that the rent would be increased @ 5% w.e.f. 01.01.2001.. The question is as to “whether that increase of 5% in the rent would be every year or it is only w.e.f. 01.01.2001?” Admittedly, the rent note does not say that the rent would be increased @ 5% every year, rather it shows that the rent would be increased @ 5% w.e.f. 01.01.2001. In view thereof, I do not find any error in the orders passed by the Courts below and as such, the present revision petition is hereby dismissed being devoid of merits. No costs. January 14, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE