IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2010 / 2ND ASHADHA 1932 Crl.MC.No. 2260 of 2010() --------------------- CRIME NO. 518 OF 2010 OF POOYAPPALLY POLICE STATION PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED ---------------------- RAJENDRAN,S/O.PURUSHOTHAMAN, REMYA NIVAS PANAKKALAM, MUKHATHALA, THRIKKOVILVOTTOM, VILLAGE KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.PRATHEESH.P RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT/STATE -------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE POOYAPPALLY POLICE STATION THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. KAMMAPPU THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ............................................................ Crl.M.C. No. 2260 of 2010 .......................................................... Dated: 23 -06- 2010 ORDER Petitioner who is the accused in Crime No. 518 of 2010 of Pooyappally Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 4(1) (a) read with Sec. 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, seeks to quash Annexure - I FIR and all further proceedings. 2. It is too early for this Court, in a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C, to consider whether the case against the petitioner is prima facie false and that FIR is liable to be quashed and investigation is liable to be stayed. In case the Police, after investigation, files a final report charge- sheeting the petitioner and in case grounds exist to assail the charge sheet , the petitioner may work out his remedies by moving the appropriate court. This Crl.M.C is disposed of directing the Police not to unnecessarily harass the petitioner during investigation. Sd/-V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani /true copy/ P.S. to Judge