-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 7779 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2005 Union of India ......Applicant Versus Babulal I. Shaikh and Anr. .....Respondents Mrs. S.J. Patwardhan with Mr. D.N. Salvi for the applicant. Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATE: DECEMBER 13, 2005. P.C. Prima facie, there is substance in the argument canvassed on behalf of the Applicant that the charge as framed was defective inasmuch as the correct charge would be under the provisions of N.D.P.S. Act and not under the Bombay Prohibition Act as was framed and for which the accused came to be tried. Leave to Appeal granted. Admit. (A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)