£1 IN TIE HIGH COURT OP KARNATXA AT BANGALOIB. DATED THIS 2113 3RD DAY OP APRIL, 1998. TH HON’BLR MR. JUSTICE CHACRASHfl MA IAN. *RU flI!flJGN No. 36527 0? 1997. Between: ./‘ ; K. Tenugopal, 1 5/0. late I. Krishnamurtt no, No. 63/i—i 2n6 cross, Ibghavendra colony Chnarajpet, Bangalore. .. . Petitioner. (Sri. z4Lnmtnarayana rao). And: The Commisstoner, Corporation of City of Banga3ore, N.R.Rod, Bangalore. 2. The Asstjxecutive Engineer, Chsnaraj pet sub-Division, Corporation of City of Bangalore, Bangalre. ... Respondents. (Sri. K.N. PLittegolibda). This writ petition is filed under Article 226 o f the Constituti on o f mdi a pr ing to quash Annexure—P dt. 9.10.97 etc., This writ petition coming on for Rn. hearing this day, the court made thefoflow ing:— 2, fl Pn 1? The petitiui. er has ma3..e an application for sanction of building plan for the purpose of constructf on of the buIlding on the property bearing No, 63/i-I, Raghavencira colony, Ward No. 46, Barjzaiore, On the said application the Cor nraton issued an endorsement stat Ing that till the disposal of the Ciid]. suit filed by the petitioner, the request of the petitior ouot be considered. 2, The reason given by the Corporation In the endorsement cannot be accepted, If the petit ior r approanhed tim Civil Court for the relief, as agait the Corration, the said cit suit cnot come in the may of considering the application for n4— t* In r opinion, there is no reason for the roration not tc consIder the application of the petitiornr for sanction of plan on account of the pendency of the suIt, Accord.in@y I s the follom— ing - b ORD3R writ oetitaon is afloed 4 The endorsement dated 9iO97 issued by the Oorpo rat in produ d a Annex re—F is qua aed, The resrtndent—Coroorataon is directed t0 conS saber the reque t of the petitinrer forsancV on I of hur1dinz ul’n in accordce with Ian, I’ ) i Jj j J’ 0— T cd*