Civil Revision No. 2732 of 2010 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2732 of 2010 Date of decision: 27.4.2010 Krishna Kumari Aggarwal ...Petitioner Versus Deepak Kalra ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Namit Gautam, Advocate for the petitioner S.D.ANAND, J. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner avers as under:- The impugned ejectment petition has filed in the year 2005. The petitioner is a senior citizen aged more than 87 years of age. The plea for ejectment has been raised by her on the basis of personal necessity. The only grievance of the petitioner is with regard to delay in the disposal of the ejectment plea aforementioned. Learned counsel states that the matter is presently fixed for 11.5.2010 on which date the petitioner shall conclude her evidence. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that he would be content and interests of justice would be served if a time- bound disposal of the rent petition on merits is ordered by this Court. The petition shall stand disposed of accordingly with a direction to learned Rent Controller to conclude the trial itself by or Civil Revision No. 2732 of 2010 -2- **** on 17.7.2010. The disposal of this petition in limine, with a view to expedite the disposal of the proceedings, proceeds on an assumption that there is no factual inaccuracy in the averment on behalf of the petitioner. If it transpires, at any subsequent point of time that this order had been obtained on the basis of any incorrect averment, it (order of this Court) would be liable to be reviewed. The acknowledgment (of a copy of this order) issued by the concerned Judicial Officer shall be forwarded to the Registry of this Court. Learned Sessions Judge shall himself maintain a tab to ensure that the case is disposed of by afore-mentioned date. Disposed of accordingly. April 27, 2010 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge