IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.330 of 2009 RAM JHULAN UPADHYAY, S/o. Late Naga Upadhyay, R/o. Ajgarwa Shishani, P.S. Pakaridayal, District- East Champaran. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 03. 25.08.2009 The petitioner has prayed for quashing the charge-sheet submitted in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No.81 of 2006 dated 29.02.2008 under Sections 353 & 409 I.P.C. Further prayer of the petitioner is for re- investigation into the case after quashing of the F.I.R. The petitioner was accused in the said Pakridayal P.S. Case No. 81 of 2006 vide Annexure-7 charge-sheet dated 29.02.2008 was submitted against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after submission of charge-sheet some questions were raised in Bidhan Sabha. In connection with the question investigation vide Annexure-8 was conducted by the Addl. D.I.G., Muzaffarpur Range, who directed for further investigation for considering some points as raised in his report (Annexure-8). Vide Annexure-6 it appears that the said D.I.G. of Police on some petition filed under R.T.I. Act informed the petitioner that the Superintendent of Police had filed petition on 13.05.2008 before the Court concerned for obtaining permission to re-investigate the matter but permission 2 was refused, hence, further investigation was not carried out. Thus, due to refusal of permission further investigation in the case, as directed by the Addl. D.I.G., Muzaffarpur Range could not be carried out. There is nothing on record to show that the order of the concerned Court refusing grant of permission for further investigation was challenged before any higher Court. Since, charge-sheet had already been submitted and the prayer for further investigation was refused by a competent Court, I find no scope for any direction to be given as prayed by the petitioner. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Mkr. (C.M. Prasad, J.)