IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No. 762 of 1992 Date of Decision : March 5, 2009 Nathu Ram ....Petitioner Versus Ashok Batra and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN Present : None for the petitioner. Mr. Narender Yadav, Advocate for Mr. A.R.Takkar, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. S.S.Sahu, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab, for respondents No. 5 to 7. T.P.S. MANN, J. (Oral) The present petition had been filed by the petitioner through Mr.P.S.Patwalia, Advocate, who was lateron elevated to the Bench. Accordingly, on the last date of hearing, notice was issued to the petitioner for today so as to enable him to make arrangement for his represntation in the petition. As per the office report, notice issued to the petitioner has been received back unserved with the report of incomplete address. The address of the petitioner has not been supplied by any one else other than his counsel, who had filed the contempt petition in the year C.O.C.P. No. 762 of 1992 -2- 1992. Moreover, learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 4 states that after the admission of the contempt petition, the matter had been amicably sorted out between the parties. In view of the above, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and is, accordingly, disposed of. ( T.P.S. MANN ) March 5, 2009 JUDGE ajay-1