HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.30147 OF 2010 ORDER: Petitioner was working as Assistant Engineer in the Andhra Pradesh State Housing Corporation Limited at Srikakulam. A charge memo was issued to him on 07-11-2008. On the next day itself, Enquiry Officer was appointed. A report was submitted by the Enquiry Officer, holding that the charges are proved. Taking the same into account, the petitioner was issued a second show cause notice and the 1st respondent passed an order dated 06-11-2008, terminating the services of the petitioner. The same is challenged in this writ petition. 2. Heard Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 3. On behalf of the petitioner, several contentions are urged such as, the Enquiry Officer ought not to have been appointed before the petitioner submitted his explanation, that the representation made by the petitioner alleging that the Enquiry Officer was prejudiced, was not taken into account. However, it is not denied that the petitioner had an effective alternative remedy by way of an appeal to the Board of Management. Petitioner can urge all those contentions in the appeal. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the remedy of appeal. It shall be open to the petitioner to urge all the contentions before the appellate authority. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J December 06, 2010. KTL