IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 550 OF 2011 Shri. Manojkumar Vedprakash Sahalod ...Applicant V/S. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr. Abhaykumar Apte, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs. G.P. Mulekar, APP for the State. CORAM :- Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J. 14th July, 2011. P.C. :- 1. The learned APP states that the applicant has been attending to the police station regularly. She also states that the mobile phone produced by the applicant does not have the facility of camera. She further, submits that the handset of mobile phone was produced by the applicant only recently. It is not the case of the police that any demand was made for the handset of the mobile and there was any delay in its production. Infact, it has been the contention of the applicant right from the beginning, that the handset of his mobile does not have the facility of camera. Since this claim which is relating to very serious allegations made against the applicant is confirmed, the other allegations made in the complaint, prima-facie, become suspect. Therefore, the application is allowed and the ad-interim order dated 23rd June, 2011 is confirmed. [SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J]