CWP No.2384 of 1990 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.2384 of 1990 DATE OF DECISION: March 23, 2011 M/S PHARMA LABS (P) LTD. ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN. 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? Yes/No 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? Yes/No 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the digest? Yes/No ---- PRESENT: MR. R.S. BAJAJ, ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER. MR. S.S. GORIPURIA, DAG, HARYANA. MR. DHIRAJ CHAWLA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2 K.KANNAN, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner had been made a provisional allotment of industrial plot, but the offer of allotment was withdrawn on purported non- compliance of conditions relating to payment of consideration and for completion of other formalities. It appears that after the withdrawal of the offer, the property was also allotted by the 2nd respondent to some other party. 2. The petition seeks for quashing of the decision of the Resumption Committee rejecting the representation for consideration of allotment. A provisional offer of allotment cannot constitute a binding obligation for the respondents to make a firm allotment so long as it was hedged with conditions and the petitioner did not fulfill the conditions resulting in withdrawal of the plot. The petitioner cannot obtain favourable consideration in this writ petition by the only fact that even at that time CWP No.2384 of 1990 -2- when the writ petition was filed and the reply was given, the 2nd respondent had already stated that there had been a fresh allotment to some other party. The petitioner had no vested right to demand an allotment so long as the decision was not, in any way, tainted by vitiating circumstances. 3. The writ petition is dismissed. March 23, 2011 (K.KANNAN) Gulati JUDGE