4 09 @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) NO. K§é$ /2010. PETITIONER: Likhu Ram Sahu, son of Tiju Ram Sahu, aged about 44 years, working as Head Master, Govt. Primary School, Bhraman Masole, Jan Shiksha Kendra, Kallu Banjari, Block Churia, Distn'ct Rajnandgaon, C.G. VCI'SUS Respondents / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan,, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. / 2. District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. / 3. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA {WW .. W / wM/wxxéz /o zoo mm (Wu) WWW WWW Wm#wm *afmm mmm Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 19.7.2010 Shri K. S. PaWar, couns cl for the petitioner. £1 Smt. Smita Ghai, Pand Lawyer for the State, on advance copy. inted in Basic Training Institute on 9‘11 July, 1977, on probation, o RSJGOI— and aftar that Rs.150.I— in the second year after clearance of the first annual examination. After The petitioner was ap completion ‘of his probation, was granted regular pay scale. Learned counsel app for the pen'u'oner submits that the tissue involved in the case is s to whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale with en‘ec from the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation eriod. The issue involved ein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrativ Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A.No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others v. State of M.P. 85 others), wherein, it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale with eifect the date of mitlal appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon‘ble Supreme Court by the “State in S.L.P. No.6892/ 1993 which as dismissed by the Supreme Court, vide order dated 3.1.1994, upho ng the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assi stant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initial e ppointment. o e e ' g r m l i 1H zoo swam W'(WH) WE‘IW ammm mmam WW ‘@W 902“ $W3TI€§T W Praveen In number of cases, this Com has passed orders directing the respondents to consider the cases. Accordingly, this petition is also disposed o§ with liberty to the petitioner to make representa‘ion, if so advised, to consider his case on its own merits and perspecttve. The petitioner ma also supply the copy of petition along with the representation. If the petitioner stands on the same footings as per order passed S te Administrative Tribunal in 0.A. u (supra) and subsequently conhrmed by the Supreme Court in S.L;P. (Civil) No.6892/93 by order dated 3.1.1994, appropriate orderi would be passed by the respondent authority. _&.‘ Sd/ E: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava i by the Madhya Pradesh No.2745/89 Madhukant Y Judge i y