:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 18 OF 2009 OF MOTION NO. 18 OF 2009 OF MOTION NO. 18 OF 2009 IN IN IN REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 50 OF 2008 PETITION (L) NO. 50 OF 2008 PETITION (L) NO. 50 OF 2008 IN IN IN CONTEMPT CONTEMPT CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 64 OF PETITION NO. 64 OF PETITION NO. 64 OF 2002 2002 2002 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 218 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 218 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 218 OF 2002 Maharashtra Lok Kamgar Sanghatana. ... Petitioner. V/s. M/s. Patel Engineering Works & Ors. ... Respondents. And Mohmad Iqbal & Others. ... Applicants. Mr. S.S. Pathak for the Petitioner. Mr. Shailesh More i/b. Shirish Naik for the Respondents. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 31ST 31ST 31ST MARCH 2009. MARCH 2009. MARCH 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . At the request of the Applicants, the Notice of Motion is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. No costs. 2. In the light of the withdrawal of the Notice of Motion, Review Petition (Lodg.) No. 50 of 2008 does not survive and stands disposed off, accordingly. 3. However, withdrawal of these proceedings would not dis-entitle the Applicants from raising appropriate plea, before the Industrial Court in their pending complaint. Equally, the original Petitioner and the Respondents can :2: oppose the same. It is for the Industrial Court to decide the matter as and when the pleas are raised before it. Needless therefore to further state that final orders of the Industrial Court can always be challenged by the Review Petitioners/Applicants and that right so also the remedy is unaffected by withdrawal of the present proceedings. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)