IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 21379 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 28th January, 2011. Gunnu Ram Petitioner through Mr. M.K.Dogra, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] This order shall dispose of CWP Nos. 21379 and 21380 of 2010 as the petitioners in both the cases have sought a direction for quashing of the orders whereby their pay was re-fixed and consequential recovery has been affected by respondents No. 3 to 5. They also seek a Mandamus directing the respondents to release full pensionary benefits keeping in view the basic pay last drawn at the time of their retirement. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I find that the issue raised in these cases has already been answered in favour of the petitioners by a Single Bench of this court in Charan Dass & Ors. V State of Punjab & Ors., CWP No. 5568 of 2008, decided on 27.05.2009 which has been further modified by a Division Bench of this Court in Tarlok Chand & Ors. V State of Punjab & Ors., LPA No. 1161 of 2009 decided on September 8, 2010. The writ petitions are accordingly allowed in terms of the Single Bench and Division Bench decisions of this Court in Charan Dass' and Tarlok Chand's cases[supra]. Consequential service benefits shall be granted to the petitioners within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is received. Disposed of. Dasti. January 28, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE