- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.340 OF 2007 SUMMONS NO.340 OF 2007 SUMMONS NO.340 OF 2007 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.2965 OF 1997 NO.2965 OF 1997 NO.2965 OF 1997 Car Mart Pvt.Ltd. & Anr. ...Plaintiffs vs. Bajaj Tempo Ltd. ...Defendant Mr.Kunal Damble for the Plaintiffs Mr.Aliabbas H. Delhiwal for the Defendant CORAM CORAM CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : AUGUST 9,2007 : AUGUST 9,2007 : AUGUST 9,2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the plaintiffs in support of the chamber summons. The learned counsel for the defendants has opposed the chambers summons. 2. By order dated 23rd January 2001 passed by this court, in the chamber summons No.1623 of 1999, the plaintiffs were permitted to carry out amendment to the plaint within a period of two weeks from that date. The Plaintiffs have not carried out the amendment in terms of the said order. 3. Considering what is stated in the Affidavit in support, permission deserves to be granted to carry out the amendment in terms of the earlier order provided the same is carried out within a period of four weeks from today. 4. Hence, the chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (d). The plaintiffs will carry out amendment in terms of order dated 23rd January 2001 within a period of four weeks from today. It is made clear that no extension of time will be granted under any circumstances. - 2 - JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE