IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.28629 OF 2010 DATED:24.11.2010 Between: Pokkireddy Prabhakar Reddy … Petitioner And The Superintendent of Police Nellore, SPSR Nellore District and others … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.28629 OF 2010 ORDER: In this Writ Petition, the petitioner seeks directions by way of a Mandamus to declare the action of the second respondent in not registering the case on the complaints made by the petitioner on 10.6.2010, 3.11.2010 and 6.11.2010, as illegal and arbitrary. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner is the owner and possessor of the agricultural land admeasuring Ac.3.50 cents in Sy. No.1P and Acs.0.70 cents in Sy. No.8/1 of Thungamadugu Village, hamlet of Vedurupattu, Doravarisathram Mandal, Nellore District. In this writ petition, it is the grievance of the petitioner that when respondent Nos.3 to 5 tried to enter into his land and tried to dig a channel in the land, the petitioner made the complaints to the second respondent and in spite of the same, no case has been registered by the second respondent. The Writ Petition came up for admission on 19.11.2010 and it was adjourned to 24.11.2010 to enable the learned Government Pleader for Home to get instructions. Based on the instructions obtained by the learned Government Pleader, from the second respondent – Station House Officer, it is submitted that the complaints of the petitioner are examined and entries are made in the General Diary 6.11.2010 and on enquiry it is revealed that the matter is of civil nature and as such the parties are advised to approach the Court of law for redressal. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that when a complaint is made, it is obligatory on the part of the second respondent to investigate into the same. I have perused the copies of the complaints made by the petitioner. Even taking the complaints as it is, there is no commission of any cognizable offence by any of the parties. The petitioner’s mere allegation is that the respondent Nos.3 to 5 are trying to enter into his land and are trying to dig a channel. As rightly contended by the learned Government Pleader for Home, the dispute is purely of civil nature and as such no direction as prayed for can be granted. The Writ Petition is devoid of merit and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. _____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 24.11.2010 bnr