L.P.A.No.224/2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.224 OF 2010 Sau.Rukhmini Damodhar Phalke and anr. ..Appellants Versus Raghunath s/o Bansi Dalvi and anr. ..Respondents Mr R.N.Dhorde, Advocate holding for Mr Y.V.Kakade, Advocate for appellants Mr V.D.Hon, Advocate holding for Mr A.D.Shinde, Advocate for respondent No.1 CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 25th April 2011 PER COURT 1. The grievance of the appellants in the present letters patent appeal is that the learned Single Judge has committed an error while holding that the Co-operative Court has jurisdiction to entertain a dispute between two members of a Co-operative society. The dispute arose because respondents 1 and 2 claimed that the appellants had encroached a certain area, which belongs to them. The Co-operative Court held that it has jurisdiction to entertain such issue. The appellate Court reversed that finding. Aggrieved by that decision, the respondents 1 and 2 had preferred a writ petition, which was decided in their favour. L.P.A.No.224/2010 2 2. We have considered the impugned order and the judgments relied on by the learned Advocate for the appellants. In our opinion, the decision of the learned Single Judge does not call for any interference as all aspects of the matter had been considered. The question whether the affairs of the Co-operative society are managed in accordance with the bye laws inasmuch as whether one member oversteps the boundaries of the bye-laws is an issue, which would be within the realm of the jurisdiction of the Co-operative Court. Appeal dismissed. ( M.T. JOSHI, J. ) ( SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. ) (vvr/224.10lpa)