1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.2703 of 2009 (Fazlul Qadeer Shah and others vs. State of Maharashtra) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.Qazi Syed Mateenuddin, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. V.D.Godbharle, APP, for respondent State. Mr. Qureshi, Adv., for respondent no.4. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:11/9/2009 ... P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Qazi Syed Mateenuddin, Counsel for the applicant/husband. 2. The notice dt.15.6.2009, issued by the In Charge is subject of criticism. 3. It is simply a notice. No action is contemplated. However, the very action in this Court ( Criminal Application No. 2 2703/2009) is premature and not maintainable. That apart, the circular appended by the learned A.P.P. dt.4th August, 1997, illustrates, if reconciliation is not possible, the parties are directed to take recourse to the legal process. Application dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/2703-09crapl