1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.483 OF 1999 WRIT PETITION NO.483 OF 1999 WRIT PETITION NO.483 OF 1999 Shamkumar Janardan Patil ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents ----- None present for the Petitioner CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. DATE: 28TH FEBRUARY, 2005. DATE: 28TH FEBRUARY, 2005. DATE: 28TH FEBRUARY, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. . None present for the Petitioner when the matter is called out. 2. We have considered the averments in the petition and the affidavit filed by Dilipkumar Rathod working in the office of the Divisional Social Welfare Officer. 3. The case of the Petitioner is that he belongs to ‘Hindu Vanjari’ Community which is O.B.C. pased on material he wanted to claim that ‘Vanjari’ Community in Maharashtra is synonymous to Banjara which was recognised as ‘Vimukt Jati’. From the affidavit of Dilipkumar Rathod it is clear that the documentary evidence on record shows that the Petitioner is belonging to Vanjari and not Banjara. The law as now settled that it is not for the Courts to examine whether the particular name is synonymous 2 to the entry in the presidential notification and the entry in the notification must be read as it stands. If so read ‘Banjara’ would be different from ‘Vanajari’. There is no merit in this petition. In the light of that Rule discharged. No order as to costs. (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.)