: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.360 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10149 OF 2004 Sunanda A. Bhosale ....Petitioner V/s. Jagruti Shikshan Prasarak Mandal & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.N.V. Bandiwadekar for the Petitioner. None for Respondent No.1. Mr.Dilip Bodake for Respondent No.3. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 4TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. : 1. I will presume in favour of Respondent No.3 at this stage that there was no intention to dis-obey the order of the Court and that Respondent No.3 was genuinely of the view that the payment to the Petitioner was to be made only from the non-salary grant, if any. It is stated on behalf of Respondent No.3 that non-salary grant of the institution has been stopped. 2. However, the impugned order of the School Tribunal does not clarify the payment to be only from non-salary grant. Nor does the order of this Court : 2 : dated 25.4.2007 place such a restriction. In the circumstances, Respondent No.3 is bound to pay the said amount to the Petitioner in compliance with the impugned order dated 12.8.2004. Respondent No.3 shall do so within four weeks from today failing which interest shall be payable at the rate of 12% p.a. from the date of the order dated 12.8.2004 till payment. It is made clear that the entire salary is payable in view of the fact that the order of this Court permitting deposit of 50% of the salary has not been complied with. 3. In the circumstances, the Contempt Petition has been disposed of. It is however, made clear that in the event of noncompliance, the Petitioner shall be at liberty to move the same without taking out fresh proceedings. 4. This order shall not prevent Respondent No.3 from seeking clarification before the School Tribunal in respect of the impugned order.