IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.8139 of 2010 MANISH KUMAR PANDEY Son of Jai Prakash Pandey Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 09.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this case, as the bags contain the FCI marks. Furthermore, the aforesaid allegation in itself is not enough for establishing the guilt of the petitioner. Moreover, similarly situated co-accused Santosh Kumar has already been allowed anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 05.04.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 6249 of 2010. In the circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today before the court below in connection with Maharajganj P.S. case no. 01 of 2010, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with the condition that one of the sureties should be in cash form. Furthermore, he will not physically absent for two consecutive - 2 - dates at stretch till three witnesses are examined, otherwise the court in seisin of the case would be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)