^' INTTHBHlGHCODRTOFJiraUCATITRBATBILASPUR CHKATTISGABK W.P.NO. f^SS 72006 .B6!'ffi!;S:;:gi;;:IMPi ill'iVLC &E^UI PETITIONEaa :, /'ChEU-anlalNishad,,Agedabout223rears, .' ^..•^V^P S/o. SKriSonaoo Ram Nishad, R/6. Gitpahar, '^P^f^y^ ^..•- District- Kanker (CG) •^]%^/''''^^^'-^. ^ ^a^> ^' VERSUS <}^^./-",. :; ..::. :' • :., • ' ' : • . ; ' ^^SPOND^TS : ^I] State of Chllattisgarh, Throu^i: Seeretaty, Tribal WeMare ' Deptt., D.K.S. Bliawan, RaipurlCG) <^^y/<>-^.2] • CoUeetOr,Daritewada, , District Dalcsliin Bastar,Danfewada ^^w (CG) . 3] .Director, Panchayatand GraininVikas Vibhag, GbIiatfisgaTh, 'Raipur, District Ralpur (CG) 4] CIlief Executive OiBcer, Janpad PaJicbayat, Bhairamgarh, • District Dantewada (CG) < .: •"• • ' 5] Block EducaSon Officer,^ Janpad Pancbayat, Bhairaingaih,^ D^ UantewaflafC&l ^ &| Ghief Executiye Ofiicer, Zila Panchayat; Danfewada, District Daritewaa.a(GG) '; m ai WR3T PETFTIQIT UNDER ARTlGl.B 226/227 OF THE CONSTITTJTIQN OF INDIA .c"'T;':KSBSI ;i..::^:':';: :Ky^l '•flRSIIt^^y^1-^^^^^^^^^^^^. WRi^sssiiSi^ ^ijSSII^B s-sws ^ ^.'. B t<sg HIC»GOUICTOF'jOTn€aUrOl^CHHATn8GAIW:BHA8PU» Slt^^BencU: Hoa'^SliriSaUish^K W.P. N0.1039 OF-2006 Petttioner : GharanlalNisIiad ^Versus ! -1-'. : ;. " ^ "•:'' "11'" . •:;-': 1' ' 11:' Respondents : State ofChhatdsgarh & ;A'.:Ofhers..:: '"••:' • : ' : :- : ; •' Stui MajaojiParaiijpe, coiuisel for fhe pefitioner. Shn SunUQtwau, paDelIawyerforl^ ORALOKDER P4fMarcli, 2006) 1. tEtus petition cdaal^^ onlcr dateii 30,11.2005, .(AiMiexure P-9), passed by ttie respondent No.5, wliereby the pffic^ Pnaiary School JKptr^al, BloGlcSBniraTngprh.'Disti^Dai^^ direCtedthatllieQtderdated 30.10.20Q5^(Annexure P-5), passed by thfi Jaiipad PancU^at, Bhairaingarh, appoiating Shiksha Karmi,; Giade-III; be nat given efifeet to wiffiout pei'missionofI)MtriefGpUect6r;Daatewada. 2. Leanied couns<sl for (he^ petitioner subnuts ? that fhe petitjoner was dnfy selected^^^^a^ Kacmi Grade-IIl, vide Qnlcr datefl 20.10.2QQ5 (Annexure P- 5),passed;by^^^ics^x}ndentNp.6.iTUereafter,^^^ffi subnufled fflte joJfflang repoi^,^^ LeaTned Gouiisel^lias.^furtJa^subii^^ h^JQined3Eh,eduties;on^l2.2Q05^itse]£^ f 3/ The petitiODfir vi^^^^^ i^ process appoiatuig Slu]ffllia Kamu Grad.e-III, faasj IseeD.i ^ canceUed. It isiurfher contended that the petitkuier llas not F^^^!4"n"^B^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^j|^^^.: :»' ^Ss^^i^SM ^^B^K:&i^^i^S\ ^•^'.:c:. ;^:^si@^t^l ^^•^^^^ ;7s^i''§BiBI ^':'l'i:@SK:iiisi ¥.e reccived aay written information as yet about canceUation Qfthe selectioa procceditlgs, or Ufa apponitment. 4. Leanied counsel appearing fbr tiie respondents No.l, 2 aad 3, submits that tfc petitroner has never joined pursuanito hisselec^n arul appoititmcutas Shiksha Karmi, Gradc-III^ '. ' • : ' as fhe Annexure P-8 is the application made by the petitioner to the ChJefExecutive OfEiGer, Jaapad panchayat, Bhairaiaigaili^ for his joining. tt Was ft^^ since the entire selection prpceedings have beca quashed and new scleetion process Uas been initiated, the petitioner does not have any right to the appointinent. 5. Be that as it-may, leamed counsel fbr fhe>petitioner submits fhat the petitioner has madea representation, (Annexure P- 11) to fheSecretaTy Scheduled Caste.Scheduled Tribe and Backward CIasses, Welfare Departtnent, Goveimiaent of Chhattisgarh, therefore, fhe resppndents may be directed to decide fhesaid representation wittun a stipulated period. 6. Having lieard teamed eounsel for fhe parties, in ffic fa.Gts aad cipcuinstanCes of the case, the respondents are direGted toconsyeradddecidefUerepreSeutation(Annexure P-11), in accoidancewithlaw/wifhin apcriod oftluteweeks, fifo^^ fhe date of receipt/prb<iuction ofcppyofthis order. 7. In view of foregoiag, tNs petition staads disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge GJ^"