IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 14TH AUGUST 2009 / 23RD SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 22234 of 2009(Y) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ V.MANICKAM ENGINEERS PVT.LTD., 364,PILLAIYARA KOIL STREET,PANNEER NAGAR, MUGAPPAIR (WEST),CHENNAI-600 037, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR-V.MANICKAM. BY ADVS.MR.PREMJIT NAGENDRAN SMT.K.B.SUBHAGAMANI RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. THE SPECIAL TEAM CONSTITUTED UNDER SECTION 17 D OF THE KGST ACT,KOZHIKODE. 2. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (WORK CONTRACT),SALES TAX COMPLEX,KOZHIKODE. BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ........................................................................ W.P.(C) No. 22234 OF 2009 ......................................................................... Dated this the 14th August, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has approached this Court challenging Exts. P5 and P6 raising many a ground, factual as well as legal. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the facts and figures given in Exts. P5 and P6 do not keep the right track of truth, in so far as the petitioner is having an actual turnover of nearly '70' lakhs and as such, the matter will have to be reconsidered by the concerned authority. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner is ready and willing to to file a proper return in this regard, in respect of the assessment year 2002-03. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well, who submits, on instruction, that if the petitioner is ready and willing to file appropriate return showing the actual turnover, as now stated by him from their side, the matter will definitely be W.P.(C) No. 22234 OF 2009 2 reconsidered . 3. In the above facts and circumstances, the petitioner is directed to file proper return before the second respondent within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. On such an event, the matter shall be re-considered and appropriate orders shall be passed afresh by the first respondent, in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within three months thereafter. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk