IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 1366 of 2010 Date of Decision: 23.08.2010 Pawan and another .... Petitioners Versus Satbir Singh and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Sushil Jain, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Arun Kumar Singal, Advocate for the respondents ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition is filed challenging order dated 24.7.2010 passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Sonepat whereby application of the plaintiffs-respondents seeking amendment in plaint was allowed. Plaintiffs-respondents in the plaint in paragraph No. 2 had pleaded that street shown with the letters EFGH is the only way for ingress and outgress to plot/ghar of the plaintiffs. During the pendency of the suit, plaintiffs moved an application seeking amendment in paragraph No. 2 of the plaint to add the pleading to the effect that since plaintiffs are using rasta for last more than 50 years, hence plaintiffs have matured easementary rights. Learned trial Court has allowed amendment application wide impugned order. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file an additional written statement against the amended plaint. C.R. No. 1366 of 2010 2 Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Defendants/ petitioners shall be at liberty to file additional written statement against amended part of the plaint within four weeks form today. (ALOK SINGH) 23.08.2010 JUDGE reena