IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6433 of 2011 SHAILENDRA MOHAN JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 28.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and for the State. The petitioner being the Area Manager of TATA Motors Finance Limited is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 379, 406 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the accused persons that they repossessed the vehicle in question. Subsequent to the repossession of the vehicle the complainant deposited Rs. 70,000/- but even then said bus was not released to complainant by the accused persons. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that at the repossession of the vehicle was done since the loan amount was not deposited by the complainant. It is also submitted that at the time of repossession petitioner was not posted in Bihar. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) - 2 - with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Patna, in connection with in Complaint Case No. 71-C- 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Bhardwaj ( Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)