IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1580 of 2009 Rajeev Ranjan Verma @ Guddu Versus The State of Bihar & Anr ----------- 4. 21.11.2011 This revision application has been preferred under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act against the order dated 11.08.2009 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur in Maintenance Case No.03/2008 by which the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.1000/-per month to his wife opposite party no.2 as interim maintenance. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. Rabindra Kumar, the learned A.P.P. for the State. It appears that the impugned order is an interlocutory order. As such, this revision application is not maintainable. It is dismissed as withdrawn. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)