IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27277 of 2009 UMESH PURI SON OF RAJDEO PURI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KISUNPUR, P.S. PIPRAKOTHI, DISTRICT MOTIHARI …. PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 16.9.2009 The Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction in paragraph no.12 of the bail application. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 379/34 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that there is land dispute between the parties and on the facts of the case it does not appear to be a case under Section 307 of the I.P.C., despite the fact that the injury was later opined to be grievous in nature, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 6.4.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari in connection with Piprakothi P.S.case No.18 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail and (iii) That - 2 - the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )