IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M. Nos.13783-784-CII of 2009 & CR No. 3320 of 2009 Date of Decision: 7.9.2009 Naveen Sharma and another ....Petitioners. Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Mukesh Mittal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Verma, Advocate for the caveator-respondent No.2. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. C.M. Nos.13783-784-CII of 2009 Allowed as prayed for. C.R. No. 3320 of 2009 In this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, plaintiffs No.1 and 2 have challenged the order dated 29.4.2006 (Annexure P-3) passed by the trial court whereby the application filed by them under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure for restraining the defendants from constructing the boosting station on the suit land shown with red colour in the site plan attached with the plaint, was dismissed and also the order dated 29.4.2009 (Annexure P-5), vide which, on appeal, that order was affirmed by the lower appellate court. C.R. No. 3320 of 2009 -2- The trial court held that the plaintiff-petitioners have failed to show a prima-facie case in their favour especially when the construction of boosting station was required to fulfil the need of drinking water of the residents of the locality and accordingly dismissed the injunction application. The order of the trial court was affirmed on appeal by the lower appellate court. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the file, this Court is satisfied that there is no illegality or perversity in the impugned orders passed by the courts below which may warrant interference of this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Dismissed. However, the trial court is directed to decide the suit expeditiously. Nothing observed in this order shall be construed to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. September 7, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE