.^2aa^ i.. ^a-^i-HC-78 7°E[ "4l<4ld^, ®T)lyis,fqcii'yy f^ ^ffb ,M6> WW ^hVti 3^'^W ('^3^1) ss^y w W\* ^Tf 3TT^T ?ti*iw ?¥BTW(to3II^I W.P. (81 ]t[o.5895/2008 PETITIONER Pradeep ][ Saliu, Agi| (Neem P^ Sur^'pur imiiai' Sahu, S/o Shri Kaslii Ram ;d about 20 yeafs, R/o ViUage Podi ira), PS Ramanuj Nagar, Tahsil- Distt. Sm-guja (CG) V^rsus SPONDENTS 1. State of C| Panchava) Bhawan, 2. The Con Examinatj 3. TheCoUed A The Ch Panchava' Writ Petition under Article SBs HQN. SHRI DHIRBNDRA counsel tfor SlTri AN Paiidev, Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy GA| Grievance of Uie petition| the examination conducted foi III for Janpad Panchayat, Od^i +i<il<'t<fl-< MWdl tf 'fs'st <riits;i< ^.siRnsD^r hhattisgarh Through The Secrefan', & Rural Development, DKS iaipm- (CG). troUer, Chhattisgarh Professional .on Board, Raipur (CG) •tor, Sm'guja, Distt. Siu'guja (CG) .ef Executive OfEcer, Janpad I:, Odgi, Distt. Sui-guja (CG) 826 of the Constitution of India toSHRA. J fhe petitioner. for fhe State. ;r, m brief, is that he appeared in selection of Shikshakarmi Grade- i, Distt. Surguia for 'Arts' subiecL r'" '.As'yfef i ";*'s^isEl-HC—78 31^1 ^I K;-<i+ ^TT 3T1^?T ?ti*liqi 'ysr '<fitii<n<i, »Tily-i|s, fsldl'y^ HI»(r(T(h*11<t» sn^i ''ra^i' (1°iij'!<<4^) ^diwof^t an^f 2- under the Other Baclsvard conclucted bv fhe Chhattisgd Raipur, the petitioner stood ^ for the candidates of OBC cal was not issued caU. letter for who stood at Sl.No. 30 to petitioner has ah-eady submi| Sureuia agatast not calliiig h| respondent No.4/Chief Exe] Odgi, even then, no action h^ this repard. He further to make a detailed No.4/Chief Executive Officer, his grievanees raised in fhis fuillier directed to decide the| On the oflier hand, le^ that m case the petitioner of this order before tfae re< considered and decided bv period of fom' weeks from the| In view of above subrt parties, fhe instant uetitionl petitioner to make a chl^[(Tl<^1 "tTm^ff "^f 'fec3t <^1^K ^sfRnsiii^i , ^lass catesprv. In the examination ^h Profes^onal Exainination Board, (t Sl.No.29 in fhe merit list prepared [.egoiy for 'Arts' subject, however, he lcoi-mseltng whereas the candidates, \3, were called for counseUng. The |:ted representation to fhe CoUector, .(ni for coiuiseling with a copy to fhe ;utive OfEicer, Janpad Panchayat jis been talcen by the respondents in that he may be further permitted before the respondent Jaiipad Paiichayat, Odgi raistng aU. ^etition and the respondent No.4 be |same within a specified period. counsel for the State submits representation along wifh copy ipondent No.4, the same shaU be |flie competent autliority; within a date of receipt thereof. liissions of learned counsel for fhe is disposed of wifh Uberty to the reDresentation before the submjits repr^sentation le^rned SUtlDlltS dAtafled s8?"C jnqtt 8-lllSY^' •uoitB^uasajdsj q; s3[33Ai jnoj jo pouad B uppiA^ s^uaT^ srp. Aq p3pp3p PUB pajapisuoo Suisq uor[BiU3S3jd3j qafis UQ •ja) 'uoptTisd siqt m pasrej saoireAaLig snt I^UEItiyiE^ tli»to]tp.2] jt ywh l-(b.U]hlfc |ns jo idiaoaj jo s^Bp sip mojj UA10 S^T UO •|7'OJ^t4U3pUodS3J aq l[eqs aiires sip 'spBm pjo srqi. jo Ados TpiA^ §UO{B {[E guisrej 'vof^ ^uapuodsaj ^- lik^lK. ua)ft >ft]ll»2 (hi'ibtjbt,) tfckh l^llf tblhttS ibihlk >TiftlUbJ '°>lfft[|l®'blAlh.lh- lap ;.:.\ M IblhUi li^llc [hp >fc;i-!y i>fc lis^iif 8A—3' 'pfcs, r &B- 1