PETITWNER RE$PON$ENT3 WRET PETiTiGN UNDER ART‘CLgZ2EI227 OF THE CQNSTlTUTiQM QF WDEA Eggearanae : Mr. $udeep Agarwai, Counsei for the eetitioner. Mr. R. Tripathi, Pane! Lawyer fer the State. Tehsildar, Mandir Haseud, District & 1 HIGH CGURT OF CHHATTK$GARH, EILA$FU§ WP4$Q No.999l2669 Jagtu Ram Verma, S/o Late Vishwanath Verma, Aged about 5g years, Tahsii — Raipur (C.G.) Versus State of Chhattisgem, Through :Secretary, Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantmiaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2 The Coliector, Dismct Raipur (CG) $RAL GRDER (22.01201 0) SUNIL KUMAR SWHA, J Heard. Learned counsei for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has reilred an 31 .102009, therefore, the instant petiiion has now become infructuous. He prays for dismissai 0f the petition, as infructuous; Accordingiyfthe Writ Fetition is dismissed, as having become infructuous. Sd/— A Sunil Kumar Sinha WW / wkx’ Judge ~