... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2363 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.92 OF 1999 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri Jaisingh G. Gaikwad for the Applicants. Shri Suresh Gole for the Respondent No.3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 20, 2006. : JULY 20, 2006. : JULY 20, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocates appearing for the parties. Application is strongly opposed by the learned Advocate appearing for the Respondents. 2. After having perused the averments in the Application and averments made in the affidavit of reply, a case for restoration is made out. Hence, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (i) and (ii) subject to the Applicants paying costs of Rs.2,500/- to the Respondent No.1 to 3 within period of four weeks from today. Payment of costs will be condition precedent. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE