IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. : 7249 of 2008. Decided on: 4th August, 2010. _________________________________________________________ Meera Mahajan. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and others. …..Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : None. For respondents No. 1 to 4. : Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Respondent No. 5, already ex-parte. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge(Oral): The case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that her name has not been sponsored by the employment exchange, i.e., respondent No. 4. It has come in the reply filed by the respondent No. 4 that the name of the petitioner was sponsored by the employment exchange once in 1986 and for the second time in March, 1999. It has also come in the reply filed by respondents No. 1 to 3 that the petitioner was called for the interview vide letter dated 12.04.1999, which was sent through U.P.C., however, she did not appear in the said interview. In these circumstances, there is no illegality in the action of respondents. Petitioner’s name stood sponsored and she herself did not appear in the interview pursuant to letter dated 12.04.1999. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge August 04, 2010. (bhupender)