IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.805 of 2008 Date of Decision:- 08.02.2008 Karnail Singh & another ....Petitioner(s) through Mr.Harchand Singh Baath, Advocate vs. Jaspal Khan and others ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) The petitioners are aggrieved at the order dated 14.1.2008 whereby their evidence has been ordered to be closed. The petitioners are defendants No.10 and 11 in a suit for grant of permanent injunction in which more than 30 defendants have been impleaded. It appears from the impugned order that four opportunities were granted to the petitioners to lead their evidence. The petitioners have already filed affidavits of three witnesses in examination-in-chief, however, they could not be produced for their cross-examination. The learned trial Court has now closed the petitioner's evidence after observing that more than a year has passed but the petitioners have failed to produce their entire evidence. Having regard to the nature of relief sought in this revision petition and the fact that there are more than 30 defendant-respondents and C.R. No.805 of 2008 -2- no prejudice shall be caused to them if no notice of motion is issued, this revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jagraon to give one more opportunity to the petitioners to produce their three witnesses for their cross-examination by the plaintiff. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that the case is now fixed before the trial Court on 11.2.2008. Let the three witnesses be produced for their cross-examination on 11.2.2008. Copy of the order be given Dasti on payment of usual charges. February 08, 2008 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE