IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.8976 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 20, 2011. Gajjan Singh Moon .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Surmukh Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct the respondents to take an appropriate final decision on the basis of the enquiry report which has already been submitted in his favour by the C.E.O. Nabha. The petitioner is due to retire w.e.f. 31.5.2011 on attaining the age of superannuation and his retirual dues are likely to be effected due to the enquiry proceedings pending against him even though he has been exonerated. The petitioner has also raised his claim vide representations dated 9.10.2010 and 17.3.2011 (Annexures P-6 & 7) also but without any response thereto. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought by him, I deem it appropriate to CWP No.8976 of 2011 [2] dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2 to take an appropriate decision on the basis of the enquiry report said to have been submitted in favour of the petitioner by the Enquiry Officer. Let an appropriate decision be taken before 31.5.2011. Suffice it to mention that if the enquiry report is accepted and the petitioner is exonerated, his retiral dues shall be immediately released without any further delay. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 19, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE