IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16891 of 2008 Naresh Prasad Singh & Ors Versus State Of Bihar & Anr ----------- 04 28.09.2011 This application under Section 482 Cr. P.C is directed to quash the order dated 28.3.08 passed by the court of A.C.J.M, Hilsa in Complaint Case No. 666C/ 2003 whereby the learned A.C.J.M, Hilsa has rejected the application filed by these petitioners under Section 245 Cr.P.C for discharge. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that land dispute in between the accused petitioners and OP no. 2 is going on and due to strain relation an informatory Petition No. 176/2002 by petitioner No. 2 Vinit Kumar Sanyasi and other by petitioner No. 1 Naresh Prasad Singh have been filed showing the apprehension of implicating the accused petitioner by OP No. 2 complainant but the learned A.C.J.M did not consider the same and illegally rejected the application of the petitioner for discharge. It appears from the impugned order dated 2.8.2011 that on enquiry after filing the complaint petition by O.P. No. 2 2 the prima facie case was found for offence under Section 341,323,504,380/34 of the I.P.C. The A.C.J.M on perusal of evidence of four witnesses as recorded before charge arrived at conclulsion that there is sufficient material against the accused person and as such there is no illegality in the impugned order to show the abuse of process of court, thus this application stands dismissed. Namita ( Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)