IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35831 of 2009 1. MANOJ KUMAR SINGH @ MANOJ KUMAR 2. Bhulan Singh Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----- 2/ 30.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. In the case submission advanced on behalf of the petitioner no.1 is that he was not heard at the time when Board finally decided his age even fixing criminal liability. Apparently, it appears that document was against him. Some suspicion should be cast at the time when he was going to be recruited and that gone against him. Age remains crucial only when that debars a candidate In such circumstances, the prayer of the petitioner no.1 is rejected. So far as petitioner no.2 is concerned, he is father may have some concern but not directly. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner no.2 is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 74 of 2002, G.R. No. 742 of 2002, above named petitioner no.2 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Patna subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)