IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 7.3.2008 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN Writ Petition Nos.32607, 33215, 37153, 37703 of 2007, 2041, 2042, 2043, 2044, 2045, 2046, 2047, 2048, 2049, 2050 of 2008, 37019 to 37023/2007, 1878, 2523 of 2008, 35706 to 35710 of 2007, 3146, 3176, 4494, 3910, 2951, 3175, 4066, 3246, 3846 and 3447 of 2008 and connected miscellaneous petitions --- G.P.Venkatesa Mudaliar ...Petitioner in WP 32607/2007 Rukmani Mariappan ..Petitioner in WP 33215/2007 P.Lakshmi Narayanan ..Petitioner in WP 37153/2007 Ammakamma Charities rep. by its N.M.Noorul Ameed, No.21, NSC Bose Road, Chennai-79. ..Petitioner in WP 37703/07 M/s.Ramaniyam Real Estates Pvt.Ltd., 21, Second Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai -20. ..Petitioner in WP 2041/08 to 2045/08 M/s. Kannappa Realtors (P) Ltd., rep. by its Authorized Signatory R.Viswanathan, T.774, 29th Cross Street, Besant Nagar, Chennai-90. ..Petitioner in WP 2046/08 to 2050/08 H.Vasantha Kumar ..Petitioner in WP 37019/07 to 37023/07 Dance & Dance Director Association rep. by its General Secretary, Old No.8, New No.17, Burkit Road, T.Nagar, Chennai -17. ..Petitioner in WP 1878/08 1.R.P.Vasant 2.R.P.Kalapana ..Petitioners in WP 2523/08 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1.Mr.D. Ramamoorthy 2.Mrs. Indira Ramamoorthy rep.by her Power agent D.Ramamoorthy 6-A, 11th Avenue,Ashok Nagar, Chennai -87. ..Petitioners in WP 35706 to 35710/2007 M/s.Indian Metal& Ferro Alloys Ltd., rep.by its Sales Officer, K.V.Parameshwaran, No.15/23 Dwaraka Colony, Brindavan Street,Mylapore, Chennai -04. ..Petitioner in WP 3146/2008 Nitin Agarwal ..Petitioner in WP 3176/2008 Buhari Sons Private Ltd., rep. by its Manager, Mr.M.Jamal Buhari, No.3, Periyar EVR Salai, (Poonamallee High Road) Chennai -600 003. ..Petitioner in WP 4494/2008 C.J.Sheth Construction Company rep. by its partner Premkumaar K.Sheth, Flat No.C Ground Floor,Anand Raj Villa, New No.7, Second Canal Cross Road, Gandhinagar, Adyar, Chennai -20. ..Petitioner in WP 3910/2008 N.K.Viswanthan ..Petitioner in WP 2951/2008 Dinesh Kumar Agarwal ..Petitioner in WP 3175/2008 M/s. Wheels Tourist Transport Operators, Chetpet, Old No.23/18, New No.47/18, Spur Tank Road, Chetput, Chennai -31. ..Petitioner in WP 4066/2008 1.K.Meenakshi Sundaram 2.Prasanna Kumari Meenakshi Sundaram rep. by their Power Agent G.Ramamoorthy, 10/21,Andavar Nagar II Street, Kodambakkam, Chennai-24. ..Petitioner in WP 3246/2008 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ M/s. Keci Sheth Sons Partnership Firm, Rep. by its Partner Premkumar K.Sheth, New No.7, Second Canal Cross Road, Gandhinagar, Adyar, Chennai -20. ..Petitioner in WP 3846/2008 Mrs.P.Indira Prasad rep. by her General Power of Attorney P.Srinath Block R.38/1,Plot No.3834, 16th Street, Anna Nagar, Chennai -40. ..Petitioner in WP 3447/08 Vs 1.The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai Chennai-600 003. ... Respondent in WP 32607,37153,37703, 37019 to 37023/07 & 1878/08 and 1st Respondent in WP 2523,33215/07,2041 to 2050/08 3146,3176,2951,3910,3175,4066, 3246,3846 & 3447/08 and 3rd Respondent in WP 35706 to 35710/07 & 4494/08 The Asst. Revenue Officer, Zone No.5,Division No.78, Corporation of Chennai, 183, E.V.R. Road, Chennai. ..1st Respondent in WP 35706 to 35710/07 The Asst. Revenue Officer, Corporation of Chennai, Zone III, Chennai ..1st Respondent in WP 4494/2008 The Asst. Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai-Zone VII, Division 113,Chennai -3. ..2nd Respondent in WP 3175 & 3176/2008 The Revenue Officer, Corporation of Chennai, Chennai -3. ..2nd Respondent in WP Nos. 33215/07, 3910/08,2951/2008 3246/08 & 3846/2008. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ The Revenue Officer, Corporation of Chennai, Zone -V, Rippon Buildings, Chennai-3. ..2nd Respondent in WP 37153/07 and 3447/2008 The Revenue Officer, Zone -9, Division 140, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings,Chennai -3. ..2nd Respondent in WP 2041 to 2050/2008 The Revenue Officer, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, EVR Periyar Salai, Chennai -600 003. ..2nd Respondent in WP 2523/08 and 35706 to 35710/07 The Revenue Officer (General), Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Chennai. ..2nd Respondent in WP 4494/08 The Revenue Officer, Zone-7, ward No.105, Corporation of Chennai, Nungambakkam, Chennai -34. ..2nd Respondent in WP 4066/08 The Zonal Asst. Revenue Officer, Revenue Department, Corporation of Chennai Zone No.6, Division No.81, No.2, Dr.Besant Salai, Chennai. ..2nd Respondent in WP 3146/08 and 3rd Respondent in WP 2523/2008. The Revenue Officer, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Chennai. ..3rd Respondent in WP 3176 & 3175/08 Prayer in W.P.32607 of 2007 Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records culminated in G.R.S.No.025/0015, dated 21.3.2007 read with Property Tax Notice for Current Demand and Arrear Demand dated 23.3.2007 on the file of the respondent and to quash the same. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ WP 33215/2007: Petition filed U/Art.226 of the constitution of India praying for a issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in Notice No.036456 Bill No.0236 dated Nil on the file of the 2nd Respondent relating to the property bearing door old No.174/New No.36, Big Street, Triplicane, Chennai-5, Situated at Zone No.06 Division 086 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and against the law. WP 37153/07: Petition filed U/Art.226 of the constitution of India praying for a issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 2nd respondent herein dated Nil of property tax- Notice for current Demand and Arrear Demand No.040565 dated Nil in respect of the Building at old Door No.212, New Door No.176, Purasawalkam High Road, Purasawalkam, Chennai-600 007 enhancing the annual value and the half yearly tax from Rs.91,728/- to Rs.2,74,147/- and Rs.15,346 to Rs.32,761/- respectively and quash the same and issue a consequent direction forbearing the Respondents herein from demanding the different tax of Rs.2,26,395/- as found in the final Warrant Notice and lavying,demanding or recovering property tax and incidental taxes retrospectively in respect of the aforesaid building of the petitioner herein. WP 37703/07: This petition filed U/Art.226 of constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to Notice in Zone No.03 ward No.049 Bill No.0875 Nil dated on the file of the respondent and quash the same. WP 2041/08 to 2050/08: Petition filed U/Art.226 of constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned notices issued by the first respondent vide his series of notice in HQR Nos.25-6/07, 27-07/08,27- 06/07,28-06/07,26-06/07,32/06-07,32/06-07,29/06/07,30/06/07,31/06/07, 33/06/07 dated 18.5.2007 and the consequential Demand Notice of 2nd Respondent under Bill Nos.0601,602 Sub Nos.000005,000003,000007, 000008, 000006, 000004,000001,000002,000003,000005, dated Nil and to quash the same and forbearing the 2nd Respondent from making any demand pursuant to revision of first respondent demand. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ WP 37019/07: Petition filed U/Art.226 of constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the Respondent made in Demand Notice Bill No.1569 with respect to old door No.26, New No.27, Natesan Street, T.Nagar, Chennai -600 017 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to continue to collect the property tax of the petitioner's property at the rate of Rs.5748/- per half year as before. WP 37020/07: Petition filed U/Art.226 of constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondent made in Demand Notice Bill No.2449 with respect to old door No.32, New No.81, New Boag Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017, and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to continue to collect the property tax of the petitioner's property at the rate of Rs.5748/- per half year as before. WP 37021/07: Petition filed under Art.226 of consitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the Respondent made in Demand Notice Bill No.0009 with respect to old door No.11, New No.14, Railway Border,Ist Street, Cauvery Nagar, Saidapet,Chennai -600015, and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to continue to collect the property tax of the petitioner's properlty at the rate of Rs.17251/- per half year as before. WP. 37022/2007: Petition filed U/Art.226 of constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the Respondent made in Demand Notice Bill No.0008 with respect to old door No.8, New No.15, South Usman Road,T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017, and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to continue to collect the property tax of the petitioner's property at the rate of Rs.10857/- per half year as before. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ WP 37023/2007: Petition filed U/Art.226 of constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling the records of the Respondent made in Demand Notice Bill No.0678 with respect to old door No.16, New No.12, Gandhi Street, Kaveri Nager,Saidapet, Chennai- 600 015 and quash the same and consequently direct the Respondent to continue to collect the property tax of the petitioner's property at the rate of R.5748/- per half year as before. WP 1878/2008: Petition filed U/Art.226 of constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorari calling for the impugned notice bearing Bill No.0110 and Ref.No.013147 issued by the Respondent corporation to the petitoner and quash the same. WP 2523/08: Petition filed U/Art.226 of constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the recods in pursuance of the 2nd respondent's property Tax-Notice for Current Demand and Arrear Demand made in Bill No.1287 dated Nil and to quash the same and consequently to direct the 2nd Respondent as to give a reasonable opportunity to the petitioners, of being heard, as provided under Rule No.6 of Taxation Rules of the Madras City Municipal Corporation Act,1919 in respect of the petitioners objections made in their representations dated 25.5.2007 and 28.7.2007 respectively with respect to revised property tax for the house property situated at old No.3, New No.5, Athipattan Street, Chintadripet, Chennai-2 and further to pass a fresh property tax for the said property on mertis and in accordance with law. WP 35706 to 35710/2007: Petitions filed U/Art.226 of constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the property-Tax-Notice Bill No.1803 current demand and Arrear demand dated Nil passed by the 2nd Respondent with respect to the flat in 2nd floor situated at Door Nos. 319/11,319/12,in Ground Floor 319/2,and in 3rd floor 319/13 & 319/14 Valluvarkottam High Road, respectively Nungambakkam, Chennai-34 and quash the same and to direct the Respondents to levy property tax according to prevailing market rate for the rent for the period from 2007-2008. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ WP 3146/2008: Petition filed U/Art.226 lof constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the impugned notice issued by the 2nd respondent in No.291008 enhancing the annual value and the half yearly tax from Rs.65520/- to Rs.1,15,424/-and Rs.7830/- to Rs.13,793/- respectively in respect of the building at old No.15 and New No.23 Dwaraka Colony,Brindavan Street, Mylapore, Chennai-4 and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents from demanding the difference tax of Rs.79,386/-found in the impugned notice and levying,demanding or recovering property tax and incidental taxes restrospectively in respect of the aforesaid building of the petitioner. WP 3176 and 3175/2008: Petition filed U/Art.226 of the constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the impugned proceedings passed by the 3rd respondent in Bill Nos. 0689 & 0769 pertaining to the petitioner's premises situated in Zone No.07, ward No.113 of the Chennai Corporation Limits, quash the same as illegal and contrary to the provisions of the Chennai City Municipal (Corporation) Act,1919 and further direct the 3rd respondent to pass fresh assessment after giving an opportunity to the petitioner to put forward his objections in accordance with law. WP 4494/08: Petition filed U/Art.226 of constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records of the 2nd respondent bearing 005191 dated Nil in respect of premises No.3, Periyar E.V.R.Salai (Poonamallee High Road),Central, Chennai-600 003 and quash the same and to forbear the respondents from taking any coercive sheps as threatened in the impugned notice No.005191 dated Nil issued by the 2nd Respondent. WO 3910/08: Petition filed U/Art.226 of constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the first respondent in his proceedings No.HO/R.No.706/07-08 dated 30.5.2007 and consequential order of the 2nd respondent in his proceeding No.Nil dated Nil, in regard to Zone No.07, ward No.108, Bill No.0240 and Sub No.000033 so far in regard to the petitioner's company property bearing Old No.19-B, New No.41/33, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai -600 034 and quash the same. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ WP 2951/2008: Petition filed U/Art.226 of constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order-final notice in GRS No.Z031/00269 dated 17.5.2007 on the file of the First Respondent regarding the property at No.13, Old 5, Parthasarathy Naicker Bridge Road, Old Washermenpet, Chennai- 600 021, in Zone-2, Ward 31 and quash and same. WP 4066/2008: Petition filed U/Art.226 of constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in respect of the preliminary Notice 07/105/1056/000018 dated Nil issued by the first respondent herein,in favour of the petitioner herein and quash the same. WP 3246/2008: Petition filed U/Art.226 of the constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the file of the first respondent in connection with the order passed by him in his proceedings No.HQR/370/07-08 in Notice No.6 dated 8.6.2007 and notice for Current Demand and Arrear Demand forthe period from 1999-2000 and 2007-2008 dated Nil of 2nd Respondent received by the petitioner on 21.9.2007 and quash the same. WP 3846/2008: Petition filed U/Art.226 of constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the 2nd respondent in his proceedings No.Nil dated Nil, in regard to zone No.02, Ward No.014, Bill No.0459 and sub No.000000 so far in regard tothe petitioner's company property bearing New No.64, Old No.340, Suryanarayana Chetty Street, Tondiarpet, Chennai -600 013 and quash the same. WP 3447/2008: Petition filed U/Art.226 of constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 2nd respondent pertaining to his undated notice for current demand and arrear demand bearing No.006492 for the property old No.703, New No.528, Poonamallee High Road, Aminjikarai, Chennai-600 029 and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents from enforcing the said demand. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For petitioners :- Mr.N.S.M.Md.Jafarullah, Mr.A.Thiyagarajan,Senior Counsel for M/s.S.Ramesh Kumar Mr.N.Nithianandam, Mr.M.Rajasekhar, Mr.S.Sundaresan, Mr.Siva Suyambu, Mr.Srinath Sridevan, Mr.B.Dayaalan, Mr.M.MD.Ibrahim Ali, Mr.K.Govi Ganesan, Ms.R.Hemalatha Mr.M.AbdulNazeer, Mr.P.S.Sivasubramaniam Mr.T.N.Rajagopalan, Mr.M.S.Ramesh, Mr.R.Singaravelan, Mr.A.Venkatesan. For respondents:- Mr.V.Barathidasan, Standing Counsel for Chennai Corporation. C O M M O N O R D E R All the above petitions are filed challenging the Property Tax Notice for Current Demand and Arrear Demand. 2. All the petitioners in the above writ petitions are owners of the land mentioned in the writ petitions. For the purpose of calculation of property tax, the annual rental value was fixed and a half yearly tax was also being collected from the petitioners. However, the respondent issued a notice proposing to revise the fair rent and consequently proposing to collect a half yearly tax and such a proposal to revise the tax was to take effect retrospectively. Notices were served on the petitioners. The petitioners sent a detailed reply by way of objection to the respondent and the same are still pending. The petitioners have not received any reply from the respondent so far. However, the respondent in his property tax notice claimed current demand and arrear demand. Aggrieved against such impugned notice, the petitioners approached this Court by way of writ petitions. 3. Heard Mr.N.S.M.Md.Jafarullah, Mr. A. Thiyagarajan, Mr.N.Nithianandam, Mr.M.Rajasekhar, Mr.S.Sundaresan, Mr.Siva Suyambu, Mr.Srinath Sridevan, Mr.B.Dayaalan, Mr.M.MD.Ibrahim Ali, Mr.K.Govi Ganesan, Ms.R.Hemalatha,Mr.M.AbdulNazeer, Mr.P.S.Sivasubramaniam, Mr.T.N.Rajagopalan, Mr.M.S.Ramesh, Mr.R.Singaravelan, Mr.A.Venkatesan learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.V.Barathidasan, learned Standing counsel for the Chennai Corporation. 4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the main grievance of the petitioners is that inspite of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ submission of the objections to the impugned notice, the respondent issued a notice for payment of property tax for current demand and arrears without considering the same. Moreover, no opportunity of personal hearing is given to the petitioners. It is further submitted that the respondent has no power of retrospective enhancement of property tax under the Act. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners have contended that the impugned notice cannot be allowed to proceed as the said notice is issued without making proper assessment and calculation and they are not in confirmity with the provisions of law. They also contended that assessment is made unilaterally by the respondent. 6. Mr.V.Barathidasan, learned Standing Counsel for the Chennai Corporation contended that the assessment made is in confirmity with Section 137(B) of the Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919 and hence in the case of property tax has not been duly assessed in any half year or year consequent on the building or land concerned having escaped proper determination of its annual value, the Commissioner may, at any time, from the date on which such person should have been assessed, serve on such person a notice assessing him to the tax or fee due and demanding payment thereof within fifteen days from the date of such service. Therefore, there is no infirmity with the impugned proceedings in all these cases. The first respondent has followed the procedure and there is no contravention of any provision of law. It is also open to the respondent to consider the objection including the retrospective effect. 7. I have carefully considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side. 8. It is seen that the petitioners are the owners of the property. They have been served with notice and given fifteen days time to file objection from the service of the notice as contemplated under the provisions of the Act and Rules made thereunder. The petitioners have filed their objections. Pending consideration of those objections , the respondent issued consequent notice demanding the arrears of property tax without giving opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioners and also giving retrospective effect. Hence, the petitioners moved this Court challenging the notice. It is not in dispute that the first respondent valued the properties of the petitioners and issued notice. Even before taking into consideration of the objections filed by the petitioners, the consequent notice of demanding arrears of property tax was issued to the petitioners. In such view of the matter, I am not inclined to go into the merits and demerits of the case. 9. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ this court after considering the submissions of the learned counsel on either side, found that it is not in dispute that impugned notices were sent to the petitioners proposing to revise tax and that the petitioners have sent objections. The demand of current tax and arrears of tax were made even before considering the objections and no opportunity of hearing is given to the petitioners and hence the impugned notice cannot be sustained and the same is quashed. The Writ petitions are allowed. However, the matters are remitted back to the respondent to pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after considering the objections and after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioners. In the meantime, the respondents are restrained from taking any coercive steps against the petitioners to collect the tax amount pursuant to the demand notice. It is needless to mention that the petitioner is not prevented by this order from paying the property tax upto date at the pre-revised date. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar nvsri To 1. THE COMMISSIONER, CORPORATION OF CHENNAI, RIPPON BUILDING,CHENNAI-3. 2. THE REVENUE OFFICER, CORPORATION OF CHENNAI, CHENNAI -3. 3. THE REVENUE OFFICER, CORPORATION OF CHENNAI, ZONE V, RIPPOIN BUILDINGS, CHENNAI -3. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. THE REVENUE OFFICER, ZONE 9, DIVISION 140, CORPORATION OF CHENNAI, RIPPON BUILDINGS, CHENNAI -3. 5. THE ZONAL ASST. REVENUE OFFICER, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, CORPORATION OF CHENNAI, ZONE NO.6, DIVISION NO.81, NO.2, DR. BESANT SALAI, CHENNAI. 6. THE ASST. REVENUE OFFICER, ZONE NO.5, DIVISION NO.78, CORPORATION OF CHENNAI, 183, E.V.R ROAD, CHENNAI. 7. THE ZONAL ASST. REVENUE, OFFICER, CORPORATION OF CHENNAI, ZONE VI NO.2, DR. BESANT ROAD, CHENNAI 600 024 8. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, CORPORATION OF CHENNAI, ZONE -07, DIVISION-113, CHENNAI. 9. THE ASST. REVENUE OFFICER CORPORATION OF CHENNAI, ZONE III, CHENNAI 10. THE REVENUE OFFICER (GENERAL) CORPORATION OF CHENNAI, RIPPON BUILDINGS, CHENNAI. 11. THE REVENUE OFFICER, ZONE -7,WARD NO.105, CORPORATION OF CHENNAI, NUNGAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI -600 034. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ +1cc to Mr.A.Venkatesan, Advocate Sr 12963 +2ccs to Mr.P.s.Sivasubramanian, Advocate Sr 12877,12878 +1cc to Mr.M.S.Ramesh,Advocate Sr 13291 +1cc to Ms.R.Hemalatha, Advocate Sr 12894 +1cc to Mr.T.N.Rajagopalan, Advocate Sr 13074 +1cc to Mr.M.Abdul Nazeer, Advocate Sr 12868 +1cc to Mr.B.Dayalan,Advocate Sr 12936 +1cc to Mr.Siva Suyambu, Advocate Sr 12922 +2ccs to Mr.S.Sundaresan,Advocate Sr 12837,12838 +1cc to Mr.M.Rajasekhar, Advocate Sr 13342 +1cc to Mr.S.Ramesh Kumar, Advocate Sr 13226 +1cc to Mr.M.Md.Ibrahim Ali, Advocate Sr 12881 +1cc to Mr.S.Subbaiah, Advocate Sr 13041 +1cc to Mr.N.S.M.Md. Jafarullah, Advocate Sr 13086 +1cc to Mr.V.Bharathidasan, Advocate Sr 13310 CK (CO) km/24.4. W.P.Nos.32607/2007 and etc Batch and connected miscellaneous petitions https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/