p •:ni: :i ii'!i"-' i' ENT THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPD<R (C.G.) ,y W.P.N0.7l.53..LI../2003 /^ ~.f PETITIONER RESPONDENTS '^ys^ .-^y ^•\^ "<aasl ^y Ravi Shankar Dawani Aged about 43 years 'S/O Shri Late Retumal Dewani Sub Engineer J.B.C. Water Management Sub Division No. 1 Janjgir Department ofWater Resources District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department ofWater Resources D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Union oflndia Through Director Deparfment ofPersonnel ahd Training Ministry ofPersonnel, Public Grieyances and Pension Govemment oflndia Room no. 312, LokNayak Bhawan 3rdFloor,KhanMarket (State Reorganisation Cell) Khan Market, New Delhi- 110003 State ofMadhyaPradesh ThroughThe Principal Secretary Department ofWaterResources Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan . Bhopal (M.P.) (^ l^ffijin^jtj 1'i; 1 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF'THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FQRISSUAXCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR FURTHER SUITABLE WMTS AND DIRECTIONS : 1 XJ-HC-22 an^r'giT R'li'* s^y ?tllff<fr'<-rf^ "T^ '<)l<<ii'i<Ll,(iinl'H<is, Rti'fl+iy sff^r ira^ tWvWSW ~ """""""""""""^f^ 2003 'f^^tT" 3IT^?T ?<CTW :HfCT •SWfrttilj •Wti^t -t! -fsiA ifa^K ^i'sriigHsn^r 11.7.2003 Petitioner(s) by Shri San^eep Dubey, advocate. State by Shri Rajesh Pan^ley, Government Advocate. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Addlj Central Govemment Staixlin^ Counsel for the Union oflndia^ Shri R.S. Jha, Deputy A^vocate General for the State of M.P. ~ Hcard> finally. CoLmsel for the petitio|iers submits Uiat tliey have supplied the copies of fhe p^titions with Annexures to the couiisel for Uie Slate ofC.G./^f.P. aiid llie Uirioii ofliidia. However, one extra ^opy be supplied aiid fhe acknowlcdgcmcnts thcrcof bc (ibtaincd. Counsel for the petitione('(s) submlts that these matters are squarely covered by thje decision of this Court in W.P.No.2353/2002 (Mahesh K and others) decided on 28.4.| uinarTiwari Vs. Union oflndia 2003. They pray that similar orders may be passed in thes^ cases also as they are similar. It 1s stated that the statemert: is made atthe Bar after due "tenfication. { :s:c^ Coiinscl &r tl^ir^porid^nte siibiiu^that'-ttic petitioncrs '-M ^^have approacKedtjeiatedty an{l it is not possible to decide the r^^^- In XI-HC-22 •V feWSIliS ?S*fFtft ^I '3's? -<ii'iiwc<, enlwis, (qnitiy •3ff^T 'qsRK ^l) 'WWVRK ~ ~ ' """""'"""""""y^ 208 'fN'^^T' sii^t'reiwdfCT * t— represenr.at.ions by t.he CenT.ra] schedi.ile as mendoned in V^ 'tiwtd'41-1 ^reff 4 ftt^ '(fsregT ^•3(POT 311^1 Ciovemmeni: wit.hin T.he Time .P.No.2353/2003 decided on 28.4.22003. Counsel for the p^tltloners are not m a positlon to dispute this. They, howev^r, pray that their matters be considered. Accordingly, relying on t^ie statement made by counsel for the parties on tfae instruc{tions received, as stated, the petitions are disposed of withj Ihe observations as made m W.P.No.2353/02 (ISdhesh K^mcir Tiwart Vs. Union of Indiei cutd others) decided jon 28.4:2003 subject to the modtfication that the petitioni detailed representation raisin^ docuiueiils witlmi teii davsl GovemmRnf: addressftd to brs, if so desire, may make a ^their grievances atongwrth fhe froiu loday Lo Uie CeiiU'al the Oovemment of Tndia, Department of Personnel and T^raining, Mlnistiy of Personnel, PubUc Grievances and Pensl<{ns, Loknayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New DeUii (State Reo be also served on the conce •ganisation Cell). Said copy of the representation duly suppojrted by aU relevant documcnts med Department ot' bofh tlie States after obtaining the ac}alowledgement and both the Statesmay jfbrwar^ the same ijo the Ceiitral Govemment with fheir coniiuents arid tfae requ^site informatibn and coinptete »E..d,etails in order to enablc thctCcntral Oovemraent to decide [4^-ya4 ,^v-> ^' \^f? iz^?-^ '? •°a<?'- 'lli : JjK.UUCas^c^s^^iL H-HC-22 ^s? -^MM^, wsrwTS.rsf^T1^' aii^i^r K-(w sv^s »ii<o'atet HltfW shHltfi an^T-tra^ ^.^.:.<^y/^ „ (^s fsre^T' sn^t TRTOR.^rf?^ -i,. b^ta rn.tn mb.de r.he representetion. Tt is open] seek such' fi-irther informatiorl and on such requisitlon Qovemment; the State Govei such representation bemg niay consider and decide the appropriate orders as deemed] with law. In view of the above, disposed of. Certified copy as per rul^i ^iit^4f't' ^Wfif ^ fs^t ^fSf^T ^r sipgn sniff It.o t.he Cent.ral ftovernmRnr ro from. the State Govemments jmg mafle from rJhe Cenrral tents will supply the sanie. On ;, tlie Central Govemment ^ame expeditiously by passinj fit and proper, ui accordance Nt.W.F and I-A., if any, stand £>. Sd/- Pakfaruddin Judge