1 7511 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 75 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1666 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant V/s. Veena Sippy & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P., for the Applicant Respondent No. 1, in person, present Mr. S.V. Marwadi, with Mr. V.V. Katti for Original Respondents No. 1 to 3 Mr. M.K. Kocharekar for Respondent No. 4 CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE: 29TH MARCH, 2011 P.C.:- This application has been filed to delete the statement of the learned A.P.P., as recorded in order dated 28th October, 2010, to the effect that there was wrongful confinement and registering of false case against the petitioner. The learned A.P.P., in all fairness, concedes that, due to misunderstanding and communication gap, he had made 2 7511 that statement. The written instructions given to him in communication dated 28th October, 2010 by the senior police officer were somewhat different. The said communication is also appended to this application. 2. Taking over all view of the matter, we are inclined to modify the first sentence of our order dated 28th October, 2010. The same would now read as follows:- “The learned A.P.P. has brought to our notice that the Commissioner of Police has personally inquired into the grievance of the petitioner and has decided to take action against the erring police officials.” 3. The order dated 28th October, 2010 shall stand modified to the above extent. Rest of the order to remain as it is. 4. We make it clear that the order on this application is not an expression of opinion either way on the merits of the controversy raised in the writ petition. The same will be decided in accordance with law. 5. Application disposed of. MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.