IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16672 of 2009 1. CHANDESHWAR PRASAD 2. SHIVAN YADAV @ SHIVANANDAN YADAV SON OF DOMAN YADAV 3. RABINDRA YADAV, SON OF DOMAN YADAV 4. ARVIND YADAV @ ARVIND PRASAD 5. MUKESH KUMAR, SON OF CHANDESHWAR YADAV 6. RAMU KUMAR, SON OF CHANDESHWAR YADAV 7. RAJU KUMAR, SON OF CHANDESHWAR YADAV 8. RAJ KUMAR @ RAJ KUMAR PRASAD, SON OF SHIVAN YADAV @ SHIVNANDAN YADAV 9. RANJEET KUMAR, SON OF SHIVAN YADAV @ SHIVNANDAN YADAV 10. RAJANI SINHA, WIFE OF RAJ KUMAR 11. PUNAM DEVI, WIFE OF MUKESH KUMAR 12. LALITA DEVI, WIFE OF RAMU KUMAR 13. SUMITRA DEVI, WIFE OF SHIVAM YADAV @ SHIVNANDAN YADAV. ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE – TETRAWAN, P.S. – MANPUR, DISTRICT – NALANDA. ----- PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. NIRMLA DEVI, WIFE OF BISHWUNDEO PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – TETRAWAN, P.S.- MANPUR, DISTRICT – NALANDA. ---- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ***** For the petitioners : Mr. Anil Kumar No.1 Adv. For the State : Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP. ***** 02. 16.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of order dated 08.04.2009 passed by Sri S.K. Sinha, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Nalanda in Case No. 1290(1)/2008/3204/2009 arising out of complaint case no. 1290C/2008 taking cognizance for the offences under - 2 - Sections 323, 341, 448, 504, 324, 380/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that for almost same occurrence Manpur P.S. Case No. 57/2008 has been instituted at the instance of complainant. Petitioners are permitted to take appropriate steps before the court below for amalgamation or simultaneous trial in accordance with law. With the above liberty, this application stands disposed of. Rajeev/ (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)