IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 6424 of 2010 Date of decision: 04.03.2010 Bhuru Singh ........ Petitioner Versus Ravi Thakur and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Sanjay Verma, Advocate for the petitioner -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner had moved an application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. for registration and investigation of the case. On 03.02.2010, the JMIC, Kaithal passed the following orders:- “Complaint presented today. It be checked and registered on the request of ld. Counsel for the complainant. Case stands adjourned to 03.03.2010 for preliminary evidence of the complainant.” No illegality has been pointed out in the said order or that the court could not call for the preliminary evidence before satisfying itself whether summons should be issued against the complainant or FIR should be registered. Dismissed. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge March 04, 2010 mohan