:SLE ® ^J e IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER: WRIT PETITION (S)No. 3"8 ^aOOe^ <^(;-\ .''Sunil Somvanshi, aged about 4 O t) e&u Son of Shri D.S. Somvanshi ° ^yeese, residence of Village Near Ona Danteshwani Petrol Pump Kanker(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS01. -iS^^^ ^^--ss^y^^- ^e^S^^.......-' 2. h\vi ^fc ^" 3. ^" ,, The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S Bha-waa, Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Lok Shiksha Sanchanalay, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur (C G) The Collector, (CG) Kanker 04. The DJstrict Education »- Officer, Education Distt. Kanker (CG) 5. The State of Madhya Pradesh through: the Secretary, Department of Education, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE ONSTITUTION OF INDIA 01. HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SiNQLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATiSH K. AGNIHOTR!, J, Petittoner ResDondents WRST PETITION (S.) N0.584 OF Sunil Somvanshi versus The State of Chhattissarh and others Present : Mr. Parag Kotecha, counseiforthepetitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents No.1 to 4. ORDER rfh (Passed on 29"' Day of January, 2007) The petitioner, by order dated 25-2-1986 (P-1), was appointed on ad hoc basis on a fix monthly pay of Rs.300/- as Deputy Teacher in Primary School, P.V. Koyiibeda, District Kanker with the condition that the services of the petitioner can be terminated anytime with one month's notice. According to the petitioner, the petitioner was not permitted to join the school after he left the school for a substantial period of time. 2. The petitioner has not indicated the date when he was declined to join the school. The petition is vague, incomplete and iacks material facts. Evenotherwise, the appointment of ths petitioner is on ad hoc basis dehors the constitutionat scheme of appointment anti not Gopat In accordance with the rules and regulations, thus, the petitioner has no right to the post. 3. it is well settied principle of law that the ad hoc empioyee, not appointed in accordance with the constitutionai scheme of appointment and rules and regulations, does not have any right to the post. !n absence 6f his right to thepost, the petitioner cannot be iranted relief of direction to the authorities to ailow the petitioner to join the post. 4. Thus, this petition is accordingly dismissed summarity. No order as to costs. Sd/- Sstish K. Agiiiliotri Judge ^' ^^^^Si^^^^SEBS^SSlB^ilSesssaiS^Stsi^^hSiiiiss^wSfae