IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.1005 of 2009(O&M) Date of Order: 12.10.2009 Dharamvir ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr. Shailender Mohan, Advocate for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR,J The instant appeal filed under clause X of the letters patent is directed against order dated 3.8.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge holding that in exercise of its supervisory writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, the Court cannot become an Executing Court in respect of order passed by the authorities under the Haryana Canal and Drainage Act, 1974 (for brevity “the Act”). Learned Single Judge has further opined that the petitioner has to seek execution of the order in accordance with law and under the provisions of the Act. At the hearing, we asked Shri Shailendra Mohan, Advocate as to whether this Court can assume the jurisdiction of an Executing Court. He has not been able to reply the aforesaid query, therefore, we find no legal infirmity taken by the learned Single Judge. Appeal is wholly without merit. Dismissed. ( M.M. KUMAR ) JUDGE October 12, 2009 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manoj JUDGE