LPA No. 27 of 2007 26.3.2008 Present: Mr. R.L. Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arjun Lal, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Asstt. Solicitor General of India, for respondents No.1 and 4. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General for respondent No. 2. Mr. VD Khidtta, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Mr.Shrawan Dogra, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Fairly, it has been admitted on behalf of the appellants that due to certain reasons the response could not be filed before the learned Single Judge. Therefore, complete facts could not be brought e.g. the Writ Petitioner is no more working with the Organization and he does not even possess minimum requisite qualification to teach the students pursuing the degree of Bachelor of Dental Surgery. Learned counsel for the appellants seeks liberty to file a Review Petition before the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, the same is allowed. If the Review Petition is filed within seven days, it shall be considered and decided on its own merits. It will be open to the parties to seek to move any application as advised before the learned Single Judge. With these observations, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to approach the appropriate Forum, if aggrieved by any order of any Court. Dasti copy on usual terms. ( Jagdish Bhalla ), C.J. March 26, 2008. ( Surinder singh ), J. (rks)