IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43951 of 2010 AMJAD MIAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 20.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Govindganj P.S. Case No. 77 of 2010 registered under sections- 341, 323, 324, 504 and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is main assailant and it is alleged that he gave one Dabiya blow on the head of one, Sultan Mian as a result of which aforesaid Sultan Mian died then and there. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the aforesaid occurrence took place on account of petty matter and as per prosecution case itself, only one single blow was given by the petitioner to the deceased but unfortunately, aforesaid blow became fatal to the deceased. It is also contended that as a matter of fact, there was no intention of the petitioner to commit murder of the deceased. In view of the aforesaid submissions as well as facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his 2 prayer for bail stands rejected. However, Sri Jitesh Kumar, J.M.-Ist Class, Motihari, East Champaran is directed to take effective steps for commitment of the case of the petitioner to the court of sessions. The concerned trial court shall take all possible steps to conclude the trial of the petitioner within 9 months from the date of commitment and if the aforesaid trial court fails to conclude the trial within the above-said period, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)