MP 1 WP1568_11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1568 OF 2011 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1569 OF 2011 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1570 OF 2011 KSL and Industries Limited ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondents Mr. Yashpal Thakur, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. A. S. Shitole, APP for the State. CORAM : B. R. GAVAI, J. TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 2011 P. C. : The petitioners take exception to the orders passed by the learned Magistrate thereby imposing costs for grant of adjournment. It is the contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioners that the adjournments were sought before the learned Magistrate on the ground that the revision was pending before the learned Sessions Judge and the learned Sessions Judge had issued notice in the said revision. 2. I find that the approach of the learned Magistrate, in saddling costs while granting adjournment, was not correct inasmuch as the revision was pending before the learned Revisional Court and the learned Revisional Court had issued notice in the matter. However, since the costs are being paid to the Legal Aid Fund, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned orders. Petitions are, therefore, rejected. (B. R. GAVAI, J)