(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6764 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6764 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6764 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1077 OF 2002 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1077 OF 2002 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1077 OF 2002 Essar Oil Ltd. & Ors ...Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr ...Respondents ..... Smt. Revati Mohite-Dere with Miss. Sangita Choudhari, Advocates for Applicant. Mr. Shekhar Ingawale, Adv. for Respondent No.2. Mr. B.H.Mehta, A.P.P. for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 17TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED: 17TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED: 17TH OCTOBER, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned advocate for respondent No.2 i.e. original complainant. 2. The applicants are praying for quashing of R.C.C. No. 148 of 2002 which is pending before the learned J.M.F.C. Pimpri, Pune. The said case is under Section 417, 418 and 420 r.w. 34 of I.P.C. The said proceedings arose out of the complaint filed by the respondent No.2 i.e. original complainant. (-2-) 3. The learned advocate for the applicants states that the said case and the proceedings relating thereto may be quashed as the parties have amicably settled the dispute among themselves. Mr. Ingawale, the learned advocate for the respondent No.2 states that indeed the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and the complainant does not wish to pursue its complaint. Affidavit to that effect has also been filed which is taken on record and marked ’X’ for identification. 4. In view of the fact that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled and looking to the fact that the complainant does not wish to pursue its complaint, R.C.C. No.148/2002 and the proceedings relating thereto are quashed. 5. Criminal application is allowed in the above terms. ***** (-3-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1077 OF 2002 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1077 OF 2002 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1077 OF 2002 Essar Oil Ltd. & Ors ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr ...Respondents ..... Smt. Revati Mohite-Dere with Miss. Sangita Choudhari, Advocates for Applicant. Mr. Shekhar Ingawale, Adv. for Respondent No.2. Mr. B.H.Mehta, A.P.P. for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 17TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED: 17TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED: 17TH OCTOBER, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- . In view of the order dated 17th October, 2005 passed in Criminal Application No. 6764 of 2005, rule made absolute. *****