IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42797 of 2009 1. Guddu, Son of Ashique. 2. Mazharul, Son of Domar. 3. Anzar, Son of Domar. 4. Rajjaque, Son of Chulhai. All resident of Village Deori Hat Gachhi, P.S. Amour, District Purnea. ---------- Petitioners Versus State of Bihar -------- Opp. Party ----------- 2 16.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the State. Considering the nature of allegation against the petitioners for an offence under Section 302 and allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code and the fact that the persons having similar allegation, namely, Domar @ Yunus, Israil and Ashique have been directed to be enlarged on bail by this Court by an order dated 14.9.2009 in Cr. Misc. No. 32735 of 2009 as also other co-accused persons, namely, Islam, Taiyab and Sabir have also been enlarged on bail by an order dated 30.10.2009 in Cr. Misc. No. 38037 of 2009, this Court would find no reason for denying the same privilege to the petitioners specially when Mr. Vikram Deo Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner also takes an oral stand that none of the petitioners have got any criminal 2 antecedent. That being so, this Court would direct for release of the petitioners, namely, Guddu, Mazharul, Anzar and Rajjaque on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 24 of 2009 only after verification of the criminal antecedent of the petitioners. In the event, it is found that the one or more petitioners have got criminal antecedent, they shall not be enlarged on bail. It goes without saying that the petitioners shall remain present in course of trial and their absence on two consecutive dates would make them liable for cancellation of the present bail. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)