IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19406 of 2009 1. SATYADEO MANDAL 2. Ashok Mandal Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 10.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners’ name appeared in course of trial, while witnesses examined in the case otherwise only eight persons with 2-3 unknown persons were named chasing the informant and deceased to protest the harvesting of crop. In that course, those persons assaulted by lathi, danda, rod even butt of the musket. In course of trial, nine more including petitioners are added. If that is believed then also it is improbable to cause assault by more near about twenty persons at a time and even then petitioners are apprehending their arrest. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with S.Tr. No. 226 of 2006 arising out of Pipra P.S. Case No. 106 of 2005, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. III, Supaul subject to the conditions as laid 2 down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. However, petitioners are directed to remain present before the Court below on each and every date and a single default without sufficient cause can be taken for cancellation of bail. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)