IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.3510 of 2008(O&M) Date of decision : December 11, 2008 Smt. Kamla ... Appellant Versus Smt. Asha Rani ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. P.K. Ganga, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate for the respondent. *** AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) It is not disputed by the learned counsel for the parties that in fact, on the application for additional evidence the order was passed by the Lower Appellate Court on the same date. In these circumstances, the only question of law which has been urged by the learned counsel has to be answered against him. On facts, the case relates to the concurrent judgments of the Courts below decreeing the suit of the respondent for recovery of money on the basis of pronote and receipt. Learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to persuade me as to how these findings of fact are perverse or cannot be held to arise from the record. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed. No costs. December 11, 2008 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE