IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 15TH JUNE 2007 / 25TH JYAISHTA 1929 WP(C).No. 16827 of 2004(C) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ PAULOSE.A. AREECKAL, AREECKAL HOUSE, MAIKKADU NOW AT CHALAKUDY. BY ADV. SRI.A.VIJAYAKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, TRIVANDRUM. 3. THE GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 16827/2004 C APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. COPY OF THE TENDER SCHEDULE ISSUED BY E/E IRRIGATION ERNAKULAM DT. 23/12/01 INREFORMATION OF DAMAGED SEA WALL. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE RECEIPT DT. 3/3/04 BY MINERAL REVENUE INSPECTOR, THRISSUR RECOVERING FINE FOR TRANSPORTATION OF GRANITE. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE RECEIPT DT. 23/6/03 RECOVERING FINE FOR ILLICIT QUARRING BY SRI. SHAJI. EXT.P4. COPY OF THE NOTICE U/S. 17(3) OF KGST ACT DEMANDING SALE TAX BY SALES TAX OFFICER (WC & LT) MATANCHERY. EXT.P5. COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DT. 16/09/03. True copy tga KURIAN JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- W.P. (C). NO. 16827 OF 2004 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of June, 2007. J U D G M E N T Petitioner is aggrieved by certain conditions imposed by the Government in the matter of execution of contract works. Apparently, the surviving prayer reads as follows. “Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the Government to incorporate any additional stipulations by entered in the “Date Book” and such stipulation be in additions to “Contractor's Profit”; and fix the actual of procurement of the raw materials to the work site instead of inserting Perumbavoor/Elavoor where from it supplied rock free of costs earlier”. 2. It is for the petitioner to approach the 1st respondent, in which case, appropriate action in accordance with law with notice to the petitioner will be taken within another four months. This writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. smp