HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI$GARH AT BILA$PUR Writ Petition (227} Na.6112i20G9 PETETIGNER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITEON UNDER Anii Jaiswal, S/o Suraj Prasad Jaiswal, aged about 2T years, R/o viilage-Dasharman, RS.- Majhgawan V (Sihora), Tahsii— Dhimarkheda, District Katni (MR) Versus 1 Smt. Durga @ Twinkle Jaiswal, Aged abaut 24 years, W/c Anil Jaiswal, Rio Village —-Kota, Tahsil Kola, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Rahul, S/o Anll Jalswal, Minor, Through guardian Smt. Durga Jaiswai, Rio Viilage ~Kota, Tahsil - Kata, District Bilaspur (C.G.} ARTBCLE 227 OF THE CONSTH’UTION OF lNDlA Appearance : Smi. Renu Kochar, Counsel forthe petitioner. SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on admission. Learned counsel ORAL ORoER (26.10.2o99) for the petitioner submits that the petitioner/husband has filed a petition under Section 126 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Family Court, Bilaspur and has also filed an application for stay of the execution proceedings, but the said petition has not been disposed of so far, therefore, a direction may be issued to the Famiiy Court to expedite the hearing of the petition. l l gK) L 2 W.P.(227) No.61 12/2009 i feel that in the facts and circumstances 0f the case, this pane order can be passed by this Court and thereby, the writ petition may be disposed of. Accordingly, W.P.(227) No.6112f2009 is disposed of and it is directed that the Family Court, Bilaspur shaii try to expedite the hearing of MJC No.120/2007 at the earliest and hearing of the MJC shall not be adjourned in a routine manner. 8X- Sd/— , l SUNIL KUMAR 5m ‘ Judge M M