IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 14301 of 2009 Between: Mrs.Durga Devi Tak and another. ..... PETITIONERS AND Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep.by its Commissioner, BRKR Bhavan, Hyderabad and others .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. The petitioners claim to be the absolute owners and possessors of property admeasuring 226 sq.yards bearing Municipal No.14-4- 239/4, situated in Shah Inayath Gunj, Hyderabad, having purchased the same, along with an existing small room, under a registered sale deed, dated 12.05.2008. They state that they wanted to construct a residential building therein by demolishing the existing small room and accordingly, they submitted an application seeking permission for construction of Ground + 1st Floor. The respondents upon consideration, granted permission and released the sanctioned plan vide permit, dated 17.03.2009. While so, it is the grievance of the petitioners that when they are proceeding with constructions according to the sanctioned plan, the respondents visited the property in question and threatened to demolish the structures stating that there are deviations, which is illegal and arbitrary, apart from violative of provisions of Hyderbad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955. Hence, they filed the present writ petition seeking appropriate directions in this regard. At the hearing, it is represented by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents that the writ petition is filed only on mere apprehensions and as of now, the respondents have inspected the premises in question. It is also submitted that if the respondents find that the petitioners are making any constructions in deviation to the sanctioned plan, they will follow due process of law. In the circumstances, the writ petition is closed and the submission of the learned Standing Counsel that the respondents shall follow due process of law, if they found any deviations in respect of the property in question, is placed on record. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 12.08.2009 VGB