1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 7508 of 2011 Decided on: 14th September, 2011. Vidya Devi .......Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others .......Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- “(a) Writ of Mandamus be issued against the respondents who are statutory authority to perform their duty in exercise with discretion as per law and respondents may be directed to release the retiral benefits/pension in favour of petitioner after counting the services rendered by her husband in the Panchayat 2 Samiti along with all consequential benefits and interest accrued thereof.” 2. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered by Annexure P-2 judgment rendered in CWP No. 1802 of 2002, titled as State of Himachal Pradesh and others versus Basheshar Lal, decided on 31.7.2008. She has also submitted Annexure P-1, representation. In case the husband of the petitioner was similarly situated as the respondent in the judgment cited herein above, petitioner’s case shall also be considered in the light of Annexure P-2, judgment and appropriate action in the matter including the disbursement of eligible benefits will be taken within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the second respondent. 3. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of , so also the pending application(s) if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 14th September, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (sck/hl) Judge.