- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Notice of Motion No.1332 of 2006 In Appeal No.445 of 2004 In Notice of Motion No.359 of 2001 In Suit No.1144 of 2000 Union of India. .. Appellant Vs. Suresh Jayantilal Thanawala & Ors. .. Respondents -- Shri S.R.Rajguru with Nisha Valani for the appellant. Shri Brijesh Upadhyay i/b Purnanand & Co. for the respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri D.Rangres for Respondent No.3. Shri V.N.Bodke for Respondent Nos.4 to 7 and 9 to 10. -- CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & D.G.KARNIK, JJ DATED : 30TH MARCH, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. Leave to delete Respondent No.8. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2. Considering the facts disclosed in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, the - 2 - failure in removal of the office objections is condoned and the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). The Notice of Motion accordingly stands disposed of. (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J) ( D.G.KARNIK, J)