IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8469 of 2010 PRAVESH RAI @ RAM PRAVESH YADAV @ RAM PRAVESH RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04 12.05.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of bail in view of the liberty so granted to him by order dated 12.08.2009 (Annexure-1) passed on his earlier bail application. The concluding paragraph of the said order reads as under:- “However, petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after six months, if in the meanwhile the trial of the case is not taken up.” A status report was called for which has been sent to and received in this Court and is placed at Flag-A. It appears there from that seven witnesses have been examined in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner, with reference to the certified copy of the depositions, submits that the witnesses so far examined have not supported the prosecution case. The certified copy of the depositions has been placed on record and is/are marked ‘X’. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State, on perusal of the aforesaid depositions, does not dispute the aforesaid submission. In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM Samastipur, in 2 connection with Kalyanpur P.S.Case no. 28 of 2003, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioner. (ii) Petitioner shall appear in person before the Court below on each date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond(s) of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)