HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (Art. 227) No.671 1 of 2010 {Writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia} Present: Mr. Sanjay K. Agrawal with Mr. Sourabh Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Sachin Singh Rajput with Mr. Anant Bajpai, counsel for respondent . 1. None present for respondent No.2. Sinqle Bench: Hon’ble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J ORDER (1—11-2011) 1. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, the petitioner has challenged legality and propriety of the order dated 6-1 0-2010 passed by the Board of Revenue, Circuit Court, Raipur in Revenue Revision Case No.RN/14/R/B-1 13(4)/421/2010. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by the‘Sub Divisional Officer as Registrar, Public Trusts under the provisicns of the Chhattisgarh Public Trusts Act, 1951 is neither revisable nor appealable before the Board of Revenue because the Registrar, Public Trusts is not revenue officer within the terms cf the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959. Learned counsel further submits that the Registrar, Public Trusts has simply referred the matter to the District Judge under the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Public Trusts Act, 1951/p i J W No PETITIONER/: Afroj Anjum S/o Late Abdui Sattar, aged (Non-applicant) about 28 years R/o Baijnathpara, Raipur, Member Mayor in Council, Ward No.41, Moulana Abdul Rauf Ward, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Versus RESPONDENTS/z 1. Arun Kumar Dubey S/o Late (Applicant) Ravishankar Dubey, Sarvarakar, Ramchandra Swami Dharmik Vinyas Bhagirathi Dubey Mandir Nayapara, Raipur‘ Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Board of Revenue Through its President, Chhattisgarh Revenue Board, Biiaspur (C.G.) 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent No.1 opposes the petition but admits the fact that the order passed by the Registrar,‘ Pubiic Trusts is not revisabie by the Board of Revenue. 4. Considering the order impugned and the jurisdictionai error committed by the Board of Revenue, the petition is aiiowed and the order dated 6-10—2010 passed by the Board of Revenue, Circuit Court, Raipur in Revenue Revision (r Case No.RN/14/R/B-113(4)/421l2010 is hereby quashed. No order as to costs. However, respondent No.1 herein may avail the remedy availabie to him under the law. 5; Consequently, l.A.No.1 stands disposedgtif Sd/- z/ T.P.Sharma Judge, ’//