y IN THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0. f^<^> /2006 PETITIONER ••••'h/ .••^7'' /'9/ '^'"••^' / o'v^t>"w </3".-' ^w- <'y ./^^f ^y/ RE^ONDENTS ^o^ •s y I^^X&^ ^fl'y3^' c^^ V3 Is.- ^ SHRI. V.B. GAJBHIYE, S/0. SHRI BAKARIW, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, ASSISTANT TEACHER, IVI.V.N RAO IVIEMORIAL PRE IVIIDDLE SCHOOL, KHURSIPAR ZONE -3 BHILAI, DISTRICT - DURG (C.G.) VERSUS 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCAT10N DEPARTIVIENT, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH) 2. HEAD IVIASTER; HA.V.N RAO IVIEMORIAL PRE IVIIDDLE SCHOOL, KHURSIPAR ZONE -3 BHILAI, DISTR1CT - DURG (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE^ONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner humbly begs to submit as under:- XI-HC-22 3?I^STWT R-iith an^?T $p*ii<n <l[so AC ^ vdTici'«i<4i(W,wal<(i<i<»;|6|di|'Hy< OT^^q^^'^'t^L" ^^s.^^]^.. *11*fril j:)?*)!* WT; 200 ft^ET. sn^srg^aiaR^fSST S-4-2006 ~ Shri Anoop Mazumdar, coun^et for the petitibner. Shrt Sushil Dubey, Govt.Ad> Heard. Leamed counselforthe petiti Ashaskiya Shikshan Sansthan (Adt t)ner submltsthat under Rule 33(i) ofChhattisgarh itapako Tatha Anya Kannachariyon KeVetanoKa Sandaya) Adhiniyam, 1978, the p^titioner is entitted to getthe beneflts where tte Govemment grant is being given to thescale corresponding categories afemploy^ In Govemment educationalinstitutions Court of Madhya Pradesh rendered i|i ihecasecSM.P.AshaslMyaKldlwMyal^een [xiunsel appearing for the State, submits that the |is petition without serving nottee fbr demand of oompetert authority ofttie respondf accordance with taw. The prayer is hot opposed b^ case, in the opinioq oT this Gourt, ei the petitioner to make a detelled competent authonty of the respondf withih a period of one month, and authority of the respondents shall d< law as eariy as possible preferably; receipt ofthe representation. It is Certified copy as per rutes. <pi<<[ca<I1'ifi*inl"^"ls'^l •(Rl+dl'l ^aiKiiail^n txsatefortheState. t-eamed counset referred to the decision 6f High ShekslwtrahterKarmw^wl San^i (W.P.Ito.249W2WKi) tteclded on a-T2-2003. On the other hand, teamed petitioner has-straightaway fited tl-li justioe. In that view of the matter, ^^hri Mazumdar, leamKt counsel for the petittoner, prays that the petitioner m^ be perfnitted to make a detaitaJ representation beforethe nts, which shall be cbnsidered on its own mertts in the other side. Having consider«l and wittlout expressing any opintoh on themerits of the ids ofjustice will be servedif a cUrection is gwen to representation raising his grievances before the nts atong with a oopyofthe petition andthis oidef, m sueh representation being filed, the oompeterrt cidethesame on Its own merits in aecordanoewith within a periodofthree months fiom thedateof (nade clear that if any grie'rance still remains, the petitioner may avall the remedy » i|abteunder the law jnclucting fitlng of p^itton. With the aforesaid observathjins, this petftton stands disposed ot. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge