IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.45052 of 2008 1. Bihari Noniya, son of Khublal Noniya. 2. Khublal Noniya, son of Shivpujan Noniya. 3. Tej Narayan Noniya, son of Janki Noniya. All are resident of Village-Gosaisidera, P.S. Dhansoi, District-Buxar. …………………………………………………….Petitioners. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Bhim Noniya, son of Biswanath Noniya, resident of village-Gosaisidera, P.S. Dhansoi, District-Buxar. ……………………………………….......Opposite Parties. ---------------------------------- With Criminal Miscellaneous No.51994 of 2008 1. Jag Narayan Noniya, son of Ramchandra Noniya. 2. Ramchandra Noniya, son of Late Ramsharan Noniya. 3. Kunkun Noniya, son of Munshi Noniya. 4. Shivnath Yadav, son of Mannu Yadav. All are resident of village-Gosaisidera, P.S. Dhansoi, District-Buxar. …………………………………………………..Petitioners. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Bhim Noniya, son of Biswanath Noniya, Resident of Village-Gosaisidera, P.S. Dhansoi, District-Buxar. ………………………………………….Opposite Parties. ---------------------------------- For the Petitioners : M/s. Kalyan Shankar & Bindhyachal Rai, Advocates (in both the cases). For the State : Mr. M.N. Jha, A.P.P. (in Criminal Misc. No. 45052 of 2008) & Mr. B.P. Singh, A.P.P. (in Criminal Misc. No.51994 of 2008). ---------------------------- 3. 16.8.2011. Criminal Misc. No.45052 of 2008 filed on behalf of 2 the petitioners, namely, Bihari Noniya, Khublal Noniya and Tej Narayan Noniya and Criminal Misc. No.51994 of 2008 filed on behalf of the petitioners, Jag Narayan Noniya, Ramchandra Noniya, Kunkun Noniya and Shivnath Yadav, under Sections 482 Cr.P.C., have been preferred for setting aside the order dated 1.9.2008 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.III, Buxar in Criminal Revision Case No.166 of 2008/24 of 2008, affirming the order dated 5.10.2007 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Buxar, in Complaint Case No.277 of 2007 (Tr. No.2463 of 2008) taking cognizance against the petitioners under Sections 302 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 27 of the Arms Act. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for permission to withdraw these applications to raise all the issues, raised herein, at the appropriate stage in course of trial. Permission is granted. These applications are dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted to the petitioners. P.S. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)