1 wp1216.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1216 OF 2011 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. B.H. Gaikwad, Advocate for the petitioners. 1. Heard learned Counsel. In a suit simplicitor for injunction, a request made by the petitioners-defendants under Order 26 Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Code has been rejected. Learned Counsel has contended that the petitioners-defendants have filed the substantive dispute before Wakf Tribunal. 2. The trial Court has appreciated the controversy as presented to it. There is no jurisdictional error or perversity. Hence, the Writ Petition is rejected. No costs. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE. 18.02.2011 gas/wp1216.11