IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION SUIT NO.30 OF 1990 SUIT NO.30 OF 1990 SUIT NO.30 OF 1990 IN IN IN PETITION NO.433 OF 1989 PETITION NO.433 OF 1989 PETITION NO.433 OF 1989 Arvind C. Purohit & Anr. .. Plaintiffs. V/s. Smt.Kamal K. Pandit & Ors. .. Defendants. Mrs.R.M.Purohit for plaintiffs. Mr.Sandeep K. Goyal i/b. Mulla & Mulla for defendants. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED : 9th April, 2008. DATED : 9th April, 2008. DATED : 9th April, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. In the order dated 11th February, 2008, two typographical errors have crept in, one with reference to the signatures on the Minutes of Order. 2. With respect to the first error, the words "advocates for" need to be inserted after the words "signed by the" and before the words "plaintiffs" in second sentence. 3. With respect to the second error, the word "suit" need to be substituted with that of "caveat" appearing in the last sentence. Order dated 11.02.2008 be read accordingly. Rest of the order stands as it is. 4. By consent of parties, the drawn up order is dispensed with. (V.C. DAGA, J.) (V.C. DAGA, J.) (V.C. DAGA, J.)