IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 17TH JUNE 2008 / 27TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 18102 of 2008(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- T.SARALA BHAI AMMA, AGED 65, W/O.LATE P. NARAYANA KURIP, ANITHA BHAVAN, KAVANADU P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.BINNI RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE KOLLAM CORPORATION,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,CORPORATION OFFICE, KOLLAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, KOLLAM CORPORATION CORPORATION OFFICE, KOLLAM. BY SRI.C.UNNIKRISHNAN, SC, KOLLAM CORPORATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 18102 OF 2008 - E ==================== Dated this the 17th day of June, 2008 J U D G M E N T The complaint of the petitioner is that the application for renewal of Ext.P1 licence has not been considered by the 1st respondent Municipality. On elapsing the period of Ext.P1, petitioner submitted another application for renewing the licence and Ext.P2 is the receipt and it is dated 9/6/2008. 2. Standing counsel appearing for the respondents also confirms receipt of the application as above. However, he points out that the petitioner will have to satisfy the requirements of the Government Order dated 31/3/2008. 3. The issue as to whether the application made by the petitioner is complete in all respects is a matter for the respondent Corporation to consider. In any case, since it is accepted position that the application has been received on 9/6/2008, the respondents shall pass orders thereon without delay. This the respondents shall do, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 10 days of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp