IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 8120 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 8120 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 8120 OF 2006 Pratibha Sidram Mangrulkar .... Petitioner versus Maharashtra Rajya Khadi & Gramodyog Mandal ...... Respondent. Shri P.M. Patel for the petitioner Shri V.P.Vaze for respondents 1 and 2. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 16TH MARCH, 2007 DATED; 16TH MARCH, 2007 DATED; 16TH MARCH, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The petitioner questions the legality and validity of the order of transfer, transfering her from Solapur to Lathur. The petitioner is working as Senior Assistant. The petitioner has stayed at Solapur right since the year 1988 till date barring a period of six months sometime in the year 1998, when the petitioner had gone out and come back to Solapur. On a request made by one Mrs.Taklikar , the employer has accommodated her by transfering the present petitioner. This, according to the petitioner cannot be an administrative reason. On this premises, a complaint of unfair labour practice was filed before the Industrial Court, and rejection of an application seeking interim stay of the transfer has given rise to the filing of the present perition. 2. In the first place the petition is directed againt an interlocatory order and in the second place the petitioner has stayed at the place from where she has been trnsferred after a long period of 20 years barring a break of six months as referred to hereinabove. There is no allegations of malafides much less substantiated. In these facts situation, I do not see any reason to interfere with the order passed by the Industrial court. 3. In the result, the writ petition fails and it is dismissed. .....