THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5185 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.1483 of 2006 in the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool against the respondents for the relief of perpetual injunction in respect of the suit schedule property. The trial of the suit commenced and it is in progress. A relinquishment deed, dated 25.05.1994, relied upon by the petitioner is marked as Ex.A1. The respondents raised a plea that Ex.A1 is a fabricated document. The petitioner filed I.A.No.1556 of 2010 under Order 13 Rule 9 C.P.C. with a prayer to return the original of Ex.A1. According to him, the document is needed to mortgage the property for securing loan, which is required for further studies of his daughter. The application was opposed by the respondents. They pleaded that the question as to whether Ex.A1 is fabricated, can be examined only when the original is available and if the document is taken away, such a possibility does not exist. Through its order, dated 25.10.2010, the trial Court dismissed the I.A. Hence, this revision. Heard Sri J.Janaki Rami Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri K.Rathanga Pani Reddy, learned counsel for the respondents. In the ordinary course, the request made by the petitioner i.e. for return of Ex.A1 is almost innocuous and deserves to be acceded to, as a matter of routine. Whenever such requests are made, the certified copies are kept on record and the originals are returned. In the instant case, however, the respondents took the plea that Ex.A1 is fabricated one. The presence of the original document on record of the Court is very much essential to enable the respondents to take steps under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act. An exercise under that provision cannot be undertaken vis-à-vis a certified copy. Therefore, no exception can be taken to the view expressed by the trial Court as to the request made by the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client would not be able to secure loan on the basis of a certified copy. If that be so, an observation can be made to the effect that the certified copy of the document that may be issued by the trial Court shall be treated as a true replica of original document for the limited purpose of processing of loan application. The agency, which is approached for loan, can also be given an opportunity to verify the original and the Court shall accord such permission as and when requested. With the above direction, the civil revision petition is disposed of upholding the order under revision. The trial Court shall endeavour to dispose of the suit, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:31.12.2010. kdl