1 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.722 of 2007 State Bank of India .. Plaintiff versus Milind Ramchandra Shirke & Anr. .. Defendants ... Ms.Hina A. Mody for the plaintiff Mr.Milind Shirke defendant no.1 in person present in the court. Mr.S.V. Shanbaug defendant no.2 in person present in court. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED :15th July 2009 P.C:- 1. Learned counsel for the plaintiff hands in the consent terms. The consent terms are signed by the Chief Manager and Assistant Manager of the plaintiff bank, both of whom are personally present in the court and identified by their advocate. They state that they have authority to compromise. They admit their signatures as well as the contents. 2 2. The defendant nos.1 and 2 are also personally present in the court and are identified by the Associate on the basis of the photo identity card issued by the Federation of Indian Export Organisation set up by the Ministry of Commerce, Government of India. They admit their signatures and the contents. 3. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X' for identification. There shall be order in terms of consent terms. (D.G. KARNIK, J)