1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No.1306/2008 [Yuvraj S. Satnurkar .vs. State of Mah. And one ] .............................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................................................................................. Mr. S.G. Karmarkar, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. P.D. Kothari, APP for the Respondent No.1. Mr. Y.Y. Ghurde, Advocate for Respondent no.2. ... CORAM : P.D. KODE, J. DATED : APRIL 23, 2009. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant as well as respondent no.2 state that the parties themselves have informed of having settled the matter in dispute. Both the counsel state that thereafter as instructed by them the parties have not approached for filing pursis to such effect in the Court. The leaned counsel for the applicant states that in said state of an affairs and time to file such pursis being repeatedly taken now, he is seeking permission to withdraw the application with liberty to file a 2 fresh one if necessitated in future. The learned counsel for respondent no.2 has no objection for granting the liberty as prayed for. In the state of an affairs as reported to, it appears improper for allowing the proceedings to continue in Court unnecessarily. Hence the order:- Criminal Application No.1306 of 2008 stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the applicant as prayed for. JUDGE halwai