IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2244 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 2244 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 2244 OF 2005 Gyanchand Verma ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Dinesh Tiwari for Petitioner. Mrs. P.H. Kantharia, APP for Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & : BILAL NAZKI & : BILAL NAZKI & A.P. A.P. A.P. DESHPANDE, JJ. DESHPANDE, JJ. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 31ST MARCH, 2008 : 31ST MARCH, 2008 : 31ST MARCH, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. :- :- :- 1) We understand that charge sheet has been filed and learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that even in the charge sheet he is not shown as accused but only shown as suspect. Since the charge sheet is not challenged before us, this Petition has become infructuous, which is accordingly dismissed. ( BILAL NAZKI, J.) BILAL NAZKI, J.) BILAL NAZKI, J.) ( A.P. DESHPANDE, J.) A.P. DESHPANDE, J.) A.P. DESHPANDE, J.)