FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5336 OF 2011 "Nilesh Walmik Kapdane Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. D.B. Pawar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. P.P. More, AGP for respondent nos. 1 to 3. Mr. N.B. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent No.5. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 18TH NOVEMBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] From the reply which is filed on behalf of the independent authority i.e. Principal of the District Institute of Education and Training, Jalgaon, it would reveal that in the enquiry independently conducted, it was found that the petitioner had attended only 104 days out of 244 working days. It has further been found that the performance of the petitioner was also found to be unsatisfactory. Not only that, but the matter was again re-enquired by the committee consisting of 3 members. That committee also given hearing to the petitioner and upon re- enquiry it also found the earlier report to be without any fault. 2] In that view of the matter we do not find that any case is made out for interference. Writ petition is rejected. [M.T. JOSHI,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-