IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.463 of 2008 SRI SURESH HAJRA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2/ 25/11/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner himself acknowledges in paragraph-11 of the writ application that his was a seasonal daily wage engagement which also lapsed as far back as 1990. The writ application was filed in January, 2008 claiming regularization/absorption. Any regularization/absorption can be of a person in service, whereas the case of the petitioner shall clearly be of one of appointment and not regularization/absorption. The policy decision sought to be relied upon by annexures-2 and 4 provides for consideration of those who have completed 240 days as daily wagers. The law stands settled by repeated judicial pronouncements that completion of 240 days in service is not a ground for regularization. It is equally well settled law that a daily wager holds no post and cannot claim regularization as it is not a mode of appointment. No mandamus can be issued for 2 enforcement of any policy decision in teeth of Articles-14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. The writ application is dismissed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)