CRM-M-12188 of 2009 - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CRM-M-12188 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: 30.7.2009 **** Durga Goyal and others . . . . Petitioners VS. State of Haryana . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN **** Present: Mr.N.K. Sanghi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Amit Khatkar, AAG, Haryana for the State/respondent. Mr.R.P.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate for the complainant. **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners, inter alia, contends that husband (Vaibhav) was arrested and released on regular bail, father-in-law (Sat Narain) was granted anticipatory bail by this Court and an another distinct relation, namely, Parmod was also arrested and released on regular bail. He further submits that though petitioners No.2 and 3 are the paternal uncle and aunt (Chacha and Chachi) of the husband whereas, the petitioner No.1 is mother-in-law. He further submits that pursuant to the order dated 07.5.2009, petitioners have joined the investigation. Learned counsel for the State/respondent, on instructions received from ASI Lakhi Ram, admits the fact as stated by the counsel for the petitioners. CRM-M-12188 of 2009 - 2 - In view of the above, order dated 07.5.2009 is hereby made absolute. It is directed that the petitioners shall join the investigation as and when required and shall abide by the conditions as envisaged by Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition is disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JULY 30, 2009 JUDGE vivek