IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1292 of 2009 RAM BABU RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc.No.5486 of 2009 1. MEENA DEVI 2. SHANKAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 2.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Both the applications for anticipatory bail arise out of the same P.S. case i.e. Raja Pakar (Baranti O.P.) P.S. case no. 107/2008, have been heard together. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the demand, if any, was made that is specific on the husband and that was supported by all the family members and lastly it is alleged that all the family members and these petitioners killed the deceased but that is not the fact rather the deceased died due to her ailment. She was provided the medical aid available there. The petitioner of Cr.Misc.no. 1292 of 2009 is maternal uncle of the husband and the petitioners of Cr.Misc.no. 5486 of 2009 are parents. The reality was realized by the informant who filed compromise petition in the case. Taking that into consideration, petitioners’ arrest cannot be justified. I agree with the submissions. In the facts of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Raja Pakar (Baranti O.P.) P.S.Case - 2 - No.107/2008, the above named three petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI