IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2008 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1930 RP.No. 366 of 2008(F) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.33234/2007 Dated 28/01/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ---------------------------------------------- DR.XAVIER C.MOOLAYIL, MOOLAYIL HOUSE, HOUSE NO.VII/247 B, KADALIKKADU P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.P.P.BIJU RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY TO LOCAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE MANJALLOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MANJALLOOR, VAZHAKKULAM P.O MUVATTUPUZHA. BY G.P. SRI.K.J.MUHAMMED ANZAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- R.P.366/2008 W.P.(C) NO.33234 of 2007 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of March , 2008 O R D E R Though the petitioner has sought review of my judgment on the various grounds, when this Review Petition came up for admission Sri.T.A.Unnikrishnan, the learned counsel for the petitioner drew my attention to Ext.P2 order and his only request was that the Panchayat be directed to reconsider the matter in the light of Ext.P2 order. According to the petitioner, if the guidelines issued by the Government in Ext.P2 are followed, the assessment will have to be brought down considerably. 2. Though Sri. Unnikrishnan was very persuasive in his submissions, I am not inclined to review my judgment on that reason. I reiterate the judgment observing that it is open to the petitioner to invite the attention of the Tribunal to Ext.P2 and the Tribunal will take decision in the light of Ext.P2, if the same is relevant. If the petitioner prefers an appeal within three weeks from today, the Tribunal will entertain that appeal and dispose of R.P. No.366/2008 2 the same in accordance with law, notwithstanding the apparent delay. Considering the above directions, the interim order of stay issued by this court will continue for a period of four more weeks from today. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. dpk