IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3350 of 2010 MAHESH SINGH S/O GANESH SINGH, R/O VILL. CHINTAMANIPUR, P.S. AND DIST. VAISHALI. ---- PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ---- OPP. PARTY. ----------- 02 29.01.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Sections 364 and 365 of the Penal Code. Three persons have been named in the F.I.R. as accused including the petitioner and one Subodh Singh. Allegation is with respect to abduction/kidnapping of the husband of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present F.I.R. has been lodged for extraneous reasons. It is next submitted that an agreement for sale of the land was already arrived at between the mother of the informant and co-accused Subodh Singh. On account of some dispute arising therefrom the present case has been lodged. It is next contended that co- accuseds, namely, Subodh Singh and Daya Shankar Prasad Sinha (both named in the F.I.R.), have since been privileged with anticipatory bail by this Court. This Court finds from Annexure-5, that reasons have been assigned for grant of anticipatory bail. In the light of the aforesaid submission, this Court is prepared to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail in 2 favour of the petitioner as well. Let petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM Muzaffarpur in connection with Sadar ( Muzaffarpur) P.S.Case no. 68 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. It is made clear that one of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioner. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)