IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32337 of 2009 HASLIM MIAN @ MD. HASLIM MIAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR 2/ 04-11-2009 Heard. Regard being had to the period of custody since 26.02.2008 in a case in which the petitioner had jumped the privilege of bail and further considering that the informant has not named the petitioner as an accused, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge, Supaul in S.Tr. No.164 of 1997, arising out of Raghopur P.S. Case No.95 of 1994. One of the sureties must be his close family members who should file proper identification document before the court below to its satisfaction. The petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date fixed by the court below, even if there being no purpose for that. It goes without saying that absence of the petitioner even on a day could be sufficient for canceling the bond of the petitioner and remanding him into custody. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J ) BTiwary/