^'o^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPBR CHHATTISGARH W.P. N0. ^>^fy /2003 PETITIONER ^ )-;.- <^^&>'s^' ..•*' ^g^-""" ^fS"' C.L.Sahu,aged64 yeais S/o.Shri ^'.R.Sahu, (Retd.Joint Director ofEducation), /o. Bhartiya Nagar, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.) E>y' A^" RESPONDENTS VERSUS : 1. The State ofChhattisgarh Through The Director /Dept. of Education, D.K.S.Bhawan Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. The State ofMadhya Pradesh Through The Director, Dept. of Education, Vallabh Bhawan Bhopal (M.P.) 3. The Commissioner, Dept. ofPublic Education Bhopal(M.P) PETITION UNDERARTICLE 22^/227 0F CONSTITUTION OF INDI^ FOR GRANT OF WMT IN THE NATURE MANDAMUS, CERTIORARIORANYAPPROPRIATE DIRECTION. WRITORDER 3u*W"r: ^afci^yp'.'uB* 3^1 ^B W\* TOT 31?^? sniiqi .? :-.,1 7.ei *11*1CTI ^WI^ '^31 •^WM<i, yfll'M'16, fsK'tl'H^ !..-X.:..........).^4.. Wt 200"^ an^i'q'w ('yI^^tT) 'S^'IWdfel 3(1^1 13/61/2005: - Shri D.R. Sharma lear<ied petitioner. Shri Sudhir Agrawal, learn^d the State/respondentNo.1. None for respondente 2 and| Heard on I.A. No.30 of apptication forwithdrawal ofthe wri< For the reasons stated in IJ same is allowed. The writ peti| withdrawn. •=hiflfd4hFf 'wi^ff ^f t%T3i' <^t+$t< ^siRnsn^t counsel for the Panel Lawyer, for 3. 2005 which is an :petition. \. No.30 of 2005, the ,,f' tion is dismissed as Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Counsel for feuuuuw- '^iiS^.sEiS^^'SXSwiSSls'iiSi^sS^^a'''^