IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No. 33943 of 1997 Between: S. Nagaiah & sons, rep. by its S.Nagaiah S/oLaxminarsaiah. R/o Aleru, Bhongir Mandal Nalgonda Disstrict. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Prohibition & Excise Inspector Bhongir, Nalgonda District. 2 The Circle Inspector (Proh & Excise), Bhongir, Nalgonda District. 3 The Asst. Excise Superintendent, Bhongir, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent authorities in interfering with the petitioner business in Jaggery as illegal, void and Without jurisdiction and also violative of Art. 19 (1) (g) of Constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.RAJ KUMAR RUDRA Counsel for Respondents : G.P. FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no cause survives in this writ petition and it has become infructuous. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA, J Date: 7.4.2005 DA/SVV To 1 The Prohibition & Excise Inspector Bhongir, Nalgonda District. 2 The Circle Inspector (Proh & Excise), Bhongir, Nalgonda District. 3 The Asst. Excise Superintendent, Bhongir, Nalgonda District. 4 Two CCs to the G.P. for Proh. & Excise, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 5 Two CD copies.