IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3992 of 2011 Birendra Kumar SON OF LATE TRIYUG RAM RESIDENT OF BAHRAMPUR, P.O. BAHRAMPUR, VIA HAZRAT SAIN, P.S. DHANARUA, DISTRICT PATNA. Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 3 12/08/2011 Counter affidavit on behalf of the Central Selection Board categorically states that a declaration was made by the petitioner claiming benefit of appointment under Homeguard category whereas no documentation was produced finally to support such benefit of reservation under Homeguard category. Now it is an accepted position that the petitioner does not come under the category of Homeguard and it was a mistake on his part to tick that column. Be that as it may, it is the declaration of the petitioner which is required to be looked into by the authorities, especially when recruitment has to be made enmass and there were lakhs of candidates who were applicants. In view of the conduct of the petitioner, no interference or re-look into the matter is required by the High Court. This writ application is dismissed. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) - 2 -