IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 6370 of 2009 Between: 1 G.Babu Rao S/o.late G.Balaiah R/o.Balmrai,Secunderabad 2 G.Raju S/o.G.Balaiah R/o.2-4-401 (J-173), Nallagutta Ramgopalpet,Secunderabad ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad 2 The Zonal Commissioner, Zone No.18, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Secunderabad 3 Raghu S/o. Not known to the petitioners r/o.2-4-401 (J-173) Nallagutta, Secunderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not initiating any action in pursuance of the representation dated 16.3.2009 of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take immediate action restraining the 3rd respondent from making illegal, construction in respect of house bearing Door No.2-4- 401,admeasuring 57 sq.yards situated at Ramgopalpet, Nallagutta, Secunderabad, and the illegal, constructions to be demolished. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.VINESH RAJ Counsel for the Respondent No.: R.RAMACHANDRA REDDY,SC FOR MCH 1,2,4&6 The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioners aggrieved by the action of respondents 1 and 2 in not initiating any action on their representation dated 16.3.2009. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Corporation and at their request, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. The case of the petitioners is that they made a representation to respondents 1 and 2 to take immediate action to restrain respondent No.3 herein from making illegal constructions in respect of house bearing Door No.2-4-401 admeasuring 57 square yards situate at Ramgopalpet, Nallagutta, Secunderabad but so far no action has been taken by the authorities. The learned standing counsel for the respondent Corporation submits that since the representation of the petitioners is still pending consideration with the respondent authorities, instead of this Court going into the merits of the matter, the authorities may be directed to consider and dispose of the said representation, for which the petitioner also agreed. In the circumstances, without going into the merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 16.3.2009 and take necessary action after issuing necessary notice and affording opportunity to the affected parties, in accordance with law. N.V.RAMANA,J Dt.26.3.2009 msv