QcS IV." 'S^S- sisni IN TUE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR Cr.M.P. NoY^' 12011 ^i.l.y P.ft-(lo-:'.""eh«^..^ d^t@"."- ^.-^•^"T" ••r VERSUS / Chinna swami_Aged 66 Years S/o Alagappan Warniyar,R/o Bharti Nagar ,Maniapur Police Station Annadana Patti Kawandnilam, District Selam 10 ,(Tamilnadu). FSI> State ofC.G.,Through Police Station Janjgir. UNDER SECTION 482 OF THECRIM1NAL -^l 1?-^ jA*il-C " ^l fc- "C3 3)1^1 ^CT lyiR? WITOT^IWiNi- o 7=T "4i'4i<n<4, ®'flly'i(o,ri|ivtiyy,< ___^&rv^s- ^o ' S^ll\ft H11MI «»*<iq»-—••• ••••T--"•••••—•••^ 200 sn^r '^w (t^'j,^^) TOiTwafcr sii^i Sti: Mon'ble !ahn Manindr^ <>han Shrivaylava. J. 01-09-2011 Shri Manish Nigam, coun^ei for the petitioner. Shri Rakesh Jha, Deputy l nis petrtion nas Deen 21/07/2010 passed in revision \< application ror grant of intenm ctistoay nas Deen affirmea. Learnea counsei Tor me| petrtioner's appiication ror int aocuments. wnicn nave &een D! tnat tne seizea anicie / siiver petitioner, is the partner in th< runner suomits mat as me mat< petitioner ougm to nave Deen law laia aown 'ov me yupreme t State of Gujarat, 2002 ! 10) SC un tne omer nana, iearr( t;ourts Deiow. ne petitioner nimseiT ig registerea unaer Section 41 ( N0.4/ZU11. l ne articies nave uoun nas examinec) tfie receicft aiary to come to tne pnma Tadi tnis stage, as trse investlgatioili intenm custoav. «ni<<lii<ilifiinf if fe<2> <fa(<;l< i;3TfiPT3II^r Government Advocate for the Siate. rilea by the petjtioner aggnevea DV oraer aatea 'herebv order dated 27/6/2011 rejectina petitioner's Detitioner suDmits tnat tne uourt Deiow reiectea •nm custoav wimout aue consiaeration OT tne &cea on recora DV tne Detmoner wnicn cieanv snow f/as given to one (->. Kaju, v/no, accoraing to tne partnership deed along with the petitioner. He inai investigaiion nas aireaay Deen compietea, tne jiven intenm custoay or tne articies, in view or me ;ourt in me case ot sunaerenai Amoaiai uesai v. 0a State counsei supports tne oraer passea DV tne the accused in the case. The offence has been -4) of CrPC ana Section 379 of IPC unaer Crime )een aiiegea to De stoien. 1 ne iearnea revisiona! piaced on record and has aiso perused the case e satisraction mat tnere are aiscrepancies ana at is stii! not over, it wouid not be proper to aiiow W, VvRlWt—i'SriSO —2/2011—1,50,000. aiI^T^TfiFIW wnsn^rsiiHh. usepti \ '»<1*1CTI 9>*<l<ti TST -^ww^, ®xily<i(o,fs<<'liy^.!, 0-<'»-^>-A^C! • SQI / IJ 200 sn^i Tra^' ('yl^^f) e'wiww^TT an^i ^ In the opinion of this C6tii|t the Couns oeiow. i nererore, Detition is accoraingivcs.ismisseci. Learnea counsei ror tne petrtioner is. npt entitiea to inten theSupreme Court in para 14 of Desas (Supra). !t would not be the Dolice for a iong time and depositea in tne Dank locKers. application ror appropnate ain examine the matter DV taKing other matenais oDtained in tne reaard to the safe custodv ofthel the case ofSunderbhai Ambali lire^hl riiftiigS-TCiir, (T.iFTOaiR—l'S/i40—2/201—1,50,000. cbi<i[<'(4lTl ^N(?ff ^f fs^ <r<n^l< ^? sifilIT 311^1 t. tnere is no irregulantv (>Nli6aa!ltV committed by am not inclinea to intenere wiin me oraer. l ne ^etitioner, at this stage, submitted that even if the fln custoav, in view or wnat nas been oDservea DV Ithe judgment in the case ot sunderohai AmQaias tsroper to ailovr tne anicies to remain in custoay OT h such case. the same should be directed to be The petitioner is at liDenv to move appropriate lction Derore the iearnea iwagistrate, wno snaii |nto consiaeration me stage ot investigation ana lcase aiarv ana snaii oass necessarv oraers wim silver articles as directed by the Suprejne Court in c,&l', S\^ M?^« ^^>e