:1: 6367.10-wp bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6367 OF 2010 Ashwini Sahakari Rugnalay Ani Sanshodhan Kendra Niy., Solapur ..Petitioner Vs. Vithal Vhanmare & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.Rohan Cama with Mr.Anupam Surve for petitioner. Mr.P.G.Sarda for respondent No.1. Mr.Vijay Patil, GP for respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM :­ V.C.DAGA & R.G.KETKAR,JJ. DATE :­ JANUARY 19, 2011 P.C. Heard. Perused petition. It appears that, during the pendency of the petition, the impugned order has already been operated, may be without prejudice to the rights of the parties. Today the issues raised in the petition have become academic. Both parties agree that the question whether the petitioner would fall well within the sweep of the RTI Act or not be kept open for being considered in an appropriate case. In this view of the matter, the petition stands dismissed with no order as to costs keeping the question whether the petitioner would fall within the sweep of the RTI Act or not open, for being considered in an appropriate case. (R.G.KETKAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)