IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1508 of 2008 KOMAL MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2/ 6-Aug-08 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the order dated 13th March,2008. According to learned counsel for the petitioner while dismissing petitioner’s writ petition against suspension, this Court had made observation that the departmental proceeding should be concluded within four months. However, such observation is not a part of order dated 13th March, 2008. He wants the order to be modified so as to include the observation in the said order. It is not possible to recollect such observation and hence the prayer to modify the order dated 13th March, 2008 is rejected. If there is inordinate delay in 2 concluding departmental proceeding and if petitioner is kept under suspension unreasonably for a long period, he may challenge his order of continued suspension through an independent proceeding. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)