CWP(T) No. 3708/2008 24.6.2010 Present: Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate, for the respondents. In the reply the respondents have stated as under: “3. The contents of this para are emphatically denied. The applicant however remained posted at Garola w.e.f. 12.12.84 to 24.8.88 (under Tehsil Bharmour) and w.e.f. 25.8.88 to 30.4.90 at Mehla (under Tehsil Chamba) thus the applicant w.e.f. 12.12.87 to 24.8.88 for which the applicant was required to apply to the competent authority through Sub-Divisional Officer, Electrical Sub Division Gehra. The applicant has now applied for grant of overstay allowance vide his application dated 31.7.96 (a copy of which is placed below as R-1 for perusal of the Hon’ble Tribunal) and the case is under process.” 2. Keeping in view the stand taken by the respondents- authorities no other and further orders can be passed, save and except that the respondents are directed to take action, if already not taken, for processing the petitioner’s claim. Needful be positively done within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. If necessary, petitioner shall be afforded opportunity of hearing/representation. With these observations, the petition stands disposed of. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. June 24, 2010 (rana)