1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.3873/2010 Mukesh Vs. State Date of order : 21/5/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri N.S. Shekhawat for the petitioner. Shri Amit Punia, P.P. for the State. ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he being driver of a Container is alleged to have off-loaded one of the eight Maruti Cars being carried out therein. It is further alleged that the said car was used for bringing illicit liquor from State of Haryana and for that purpose, he was also made accused for offence under Section 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act. Except these two cases, there is no other case pending against the petitioner. Petitioner would undertake not to indulge in any offence in future. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on 2 bail. In the result, this bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Mukesh S/o Hari Singh shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No.68/2010, P.S. Shahjhanpur, Distt. Alwar on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. However, in case the petitioners are found indulged in similar offence at any point of time, the prosecution would be at liberty to apply for cancellation of their bail before the Court of Sessions itself and the bail would be liable to be cancelled on this ground alone. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/