IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7196 of 2007 MANOJ KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 16/02/2010 None appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State is present. Based on the averments made in the counter affidavit, it is stated that payment to the petitioner has been made in accordance with the verification of the work done. Whatever has been deducted is deduction due to completion of work by the petitioner beyond the period fixed which is permissible under the agreement itself. In view of the above stated position, no dispute is required to be adjudicated upon. This writ application is dismissed. AMIN (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)