IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.407 of 2011 1. RAJU RAI, son of late Sukhari Rai 2. Taramuni Devi @ Nirmala Devi @ Muni, wife of Late Sukhari Rai Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 04.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioners seek their bail in connection with Brahampur (Krishna Braham) P.S. Case No. 200 of 2010 registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 326, 307, 498A/34 of the I.P.C., and subsequently Section 304B of the I.P.C. was also added. Admittedly, petitioner no.1 is husband whereas petitioner no.2 is mother-in-law of the deceased whose statement was recorded on 17.6.2010, in which she very clearly stated that on 14.6.2010 petitioner no.2 and co-accused Mansa Devi sprinkled kerosene oil on her person and, thereafter, they lit fire and when she tried to flee from there, she was pushed again in room by petitioner no.1. The aforesaid statement of deceased is amount to dying declaration. Although, the learned counsel for the petitioners tried to convince me about the innocence of petitioners placing this submission that at the instance of uncle of the deceased the aforesaid fardbeyan was recorded, but I am not at all convinced with the aforesaid submission, accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioners stands rejected. PN ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)