IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25105 of 2010 PANCHAM KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR --------------- 2 06.08.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Kawakole P.S. Case No. 52 of 2010 for offences punishable under Sections 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner with reference to the statement made by the victim girl under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. placed at Annexure-2 of the application, submits that a bare perusal thereof itself shows that no offence is made out against this petitioner. He further submits that the abduction of the victim girl, the daughter of the informant if at all, was made by one Ajit Kumar. He further submits that the girl herself has stated that during her custodial period under Ajit Kumar this petitioner at no stage talked to her although the petitioner wanted to marry her. He further submits that no case under Section 366A is made out against this - 2 - petitioner. Considering the circumstances and the submissions of learned counsel, let the petitioner namely, Pancham Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Kawakole P.S. Case No. 52 of 2010 subject to the condition that the petitioner would ensure his representation before the Court below on each and very date fixed in the case and the failure on the part of the petitioner to ensure his representation on two consecutive dates fixed without reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the trial Court, would confer liberty on the Court concerned to initiate proceeding for cancellation of his bail bonds and to take him into custody. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J.)