:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.346 OF 2005 Sunil Pandurang Gaikwad ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr.G.V. Bhagat, for the Applicant absent. Mr.A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 1st March 2005 P.C.: . None appeared for the Petitioner even at the second call. Learned A.P.P. has pointed out that this matter has become infructuous, because the trial has been concluded. Even if the matter has become infructuous, that does not absolve the Advocate on Record from making appearance before the Court and to inform the Court about the changed position. The casual attitude of the :2: Advocate on Record for the Petitioner cannot be countenanced. Dismissed for non-prosecution. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)