IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33482 of 2009 BALDEO PRASAD GUPTA Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----- 2/ 17.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been alleged for enforcing a deed bearing informant’s father signature. Partition is admitted in between the parties and it is submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that Halka Karamchari appeared in the case diary stating about production of the deed by this partition may be relied or not but disputed signature is not compared till now by any admitted signature of the deceased. Moreover, its effect in civil suit is greater than criminal side. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Jankinagar P.S. Case No. 120 of 2008 (G.R. No. 2648 of 2008), above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Purnea subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)