H!GH COURT OF CHHATriaSARH AT BILASPUR Sinaie Bench Hon'bieShriH.L.Dattu. CJ. Contemot Case No.llS of 2006 Manmohan Patel, S/o Nandram Patel, aged about 38 yeare, Occupation Sen/ice at Pre Matric Scheduled Caste Balak Chatrawas, District Raigarh, Tahsil and Distriot Raigarti (C.G.) versus Resoondent Dr. Lalit Shukla, Assistant Commissioner, Advrasi Vikas, Raigarh, Tahsil and Di^rict Raigarh (C.G.) Present : Shri Awadh Tripathi, counsel for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Senior Advoriate with Shri A.S.Kachhawaha, counsel forthe respondent. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 28<h March, 3X)7) Thte Court, by its order dated 11-7-2006 in Writ Petition No.1792fi005 had passed the following order :- "For the reasons stated-above, the petition is allowed and the impugned order dated 4.10.97 (Annexure A/4) is quashed. The petitioners are entitled to regular pay scates accordingly from the date, the same have been withdrawn by the impugned order. No order as to oosts." (2) Alleging that the respondent has not oomplied with the orders and directions issued by this Court, the complainant/petitioner ts before me in this contempt petition. (3)"*. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent, on instruction, would submit that the respondent has complied with the ordera and direotions issued by this Court. inr ^._:_. ^'"^^^s^^""" 2- (4) I do not doubt the correotness of the statement made by leamed counsei appearing for the respondent. (5) In view of the above, since there is substantial oompliance of the orders and directions issued by this Court, no proceedings need be continued further in this contempt petition. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings are dropped. Ordered accordingly. — Sd/- Chief Justice ar