^iVCO F BEiit^i IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.No...........^3.?..?..../2005 PETITIONERS CUY.O-?- - 1] ,4? M/ ^/ ^A^?/ ^%>/'21 /^w ^/j%/ ^/", :f~// ^ Smt. Asha Mishra W/o Shri Naveen Agnihotri. Aged about -3^.- years R/o Barpali Chowk, TehsU Champa, Distt- Janjgir (C.G.) Snit. Shyania Pandey W/o Late Shri Ram Naresh Pandey Aged about -14-^~ years R/o Rambagpara, TehsU & Distt- Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS '^F^r\'\- RESPONDENTS 1) Shanti Bai Wd/o Mohan - ^^lc::a€ Aged about- J4^—years. R/o Tikrapara TehsU & District - Raipur (C.G.) 2] 3] 4] Vishal Dubey S/o Mohan Aged about- •2^3—years. R/o Tikrapara Tehsil 85 District - Raipur (C.G.) Rakesh Dubey S /o Raniadhin Dubey Aged about --^^—years. R/o Halwai Line, Sadar Bazar, Tehsil 65 District - Raipur (C.G.). Santosh Mishra S/o R.B. Mishra Aged about-S-^—years, R/o Nandi Chowk, Tikrapara Tah 8s Distt-Raipur. ~- 9^:i^si A /--^^ 5] Raniesh Mishra S/o R.B. Mishra Aged about—3^--years, R/o Nandi Chowk, Tikrapara Tah & Distt- Raipur.. gt ^vh Si L^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 *11*1«>1^^IT^ ^•oq T«i«io>«, t?-al'<-i<i<?, Roixiyx .^).'..y...-fc^7..7./ Wt200S 3TI^?Tq^P('g^¥^r^[) 9TI^$TcRTR^i<h WITOT^^Ta^TN? ^ryvl^ r €7w B^TTW ^rf^T 3TT^$T 16-9-2005 Heard Mr. Y.C. Sharma, cc By the instant writ pe1 Ctonstitution of India, the peti propriety and correctness of th^ trial Court has refused to grant^ filed by rcspondents No.l & 2 I have perused the orderi No.l & 2 (respondents No.4 & 5| sufficient time has already been petitioners herein, therefore, fur\ the prayer. As on record, repfy has| applicants i.e. non-appliGante N^ <PI<<[o<n<1 +1MC)T^ff^^l xRt^lK ^Srrf^TOT^^T iunsel for the petitionCTS, on admission. ition under Article 226/227 of the tioners have questiondd the le^lity^ ; order dated 25-4-2005, whereby the time for fiting reply of the appiication herein fbr setting aside the ex-parte decree which was passed in favj^ur of the petitioners and respondents No.3 to 5 herein. in which it has been mentiooed that reply of the said application ha^ alrcady been filed by non-applicants herein) and it has txsen mentioned that granted to non-applicants No.3 & 4, tfoe ;her time is not necessary, and rejected already been filed by the two non- >.l 8& 2 (respondents No.4 & 5 hereinl, more over sufficient time was gr^nted to the petitioncrs Iwrdn and they failed to utiltee that time^ I do r|ot find any illegality or mfirmity m the titjii order impugned. The writ petitjion is therefore, liable to be dismiased and it is accordingly, dismissed, Consequently, M.(W.)P.N stand disposed of. ^.t the admission stage itself. ^>.3^1/20©5 and I.A.No.7923/2005 Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge