IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 168 of 2008. Decided on: 19.06.2010. __________________________________________________________ Shyam Lal Thakur. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Dr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): The petitioner is aggrieved by the office order dated 18th May, 2007. Mr. Lalit Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client is ready and willing to make a representation to the Secretary (PW) for redressal of his grievance in view of the judgment rendered by this Court in State of Himachal Pradesh versus Gauri Dutt. 2. Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the Secretary (PW) within a period of three weeks from today. The Principal Secretary (PW) shall decide the same in view of the judgment rendered by this Court in State of Himachal Pradesh versus 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - Gauri Dutt within a further period of ten weeks after the receipt of the same. 3. Consequently, in view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition stands disposed of. There will be no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. June 19, 2010. (sck).