IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 28TH OCTOBER 2011 / 6TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 26169 of 2011(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- T.J. GOVINDARU, THARANGINI ILLOM, SOORANAD P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.D.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHYTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, 695 001. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHYTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. MR. K.S. ANIL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 26169 of 2011(U) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WP(C)NO.27950/00 OF THE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN CCC.NO.937/2008 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DATED 27.6.2011 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER'S COUNSEL. /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No.26169 OF 2011 ......................................................................... Dated this the 28th October , 2011 J U D G M E N T This is the second or third round of litigation before this Court for disbursement of eligible DCRG to the petitioner. It is stated that in the earlier round of litigation, the benefit was extended to the petitioner as per the judgment in W.P.(C) No.27950 of 2006, which was allowed in terms of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this court in W.A.No.1062 of 2003. As per the said verdict, the balance DCRG payable to the petitioner was ordered to be disbursed within three months. Since the said direction was not complied with, the petitioner moved this Court by filing COC.No.937 of 2008, which was subsequently closed as per Ext. P2 order dated 22.07.2008 referring to the submission made from the part of the Board that they had already approached the Apex Court by filing SLP with a petition to condone the delay,which was numbered as W.P.(C) No.26169 OF 2011 2 CC.No.7744-45/2008. It is the case of the petitioner that inspite of finalisation of the proceedings, by virtue of withdrawal of SLP, the due amounts to the petitioner are still to be disbursed, which made the petitioner to approach this Court again by filing this Writ Petition. When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Standing Counsel for the Board submits that the due amount to the petitioner will be disbursed positively within one month from today. The said submission is recorded and the writ petition is disposed of. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk