IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14290 of 2010 JITENDRA THAKUR S/O LATE RAGHU THAKUR @ RAGHU NANDAN THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 1.7.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The first information report was instituted against unknown persons when two dead bodies of unknown males were found by the informant. During investigation it transpired that the petitioner was the driver of the vehicle which was owned by one of the deceased and in which the other deceased was a khalasi. It was alleged that the petitioner had taken the owner and the khalasi with him and thereafter they were found dead but the petitioner with the vehicle in question was missing. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. At the time of renewal of bail the petitioner shall specify about his antecedents. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )