1 ca12911.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12911 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6604 OF 2011 (Ravindra s/o. Champalal Khinvasara & Ors. Vs. Dr. Subhash s/o. Shivchandr Zanwar & Ors.) Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 21.10.2011 Mr. V.D.Salunke, Advocate for the applicants; Mr. D.V. Soman, Advocate for respondent No.1; Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 & 3; Mr. P.V. Mandlik, Sr. Advocate i/b. Mr. A.S. Gandhi, Advocate for respondent No.7; Mr. V.D. Hon i/b. Mr. V.B. Jadhav, Advocate for respondent No.9. 1. Heard. The petitioners’ advocate moved this application for speaking to the minutes. 2. The first submission is in respect of the words “appointed by the order of 1988” in para 10 of the order. By consent these words are replaced by “appointed by order dated 20.12.2008, passed by respondent No.2”. Office to make necessary corrections forthwith. 2 ca12911.11 3. The second submission is in respect of last sentence of the order which says “The writ petition stands dismissed”. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners said that the word “dismissed” is creating some confusion and so it should be replaced suitably. I heard both the sides on this submission. The respondents are opposing the application for removing of word “dismissed”. I think such change is required to be made only if suitable application for review is made. Liberty is given to move. 4. The Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] snk/2011/OCT11/ca12911.11