IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17736 of 2008 1. Dr. Nawal Kishore Verma, son of Late Surya Narayan Prasad, Resident of Mohalla- Chitragupta Colony, Station Road, P.O. & P.S.-Mahnar, District-Vaishali. 2. Dr. Ramakant Sharma, Son of Sri Jagdish Sharma, resident of Mohalla-Sadpura, P.O.- Ramna, Ward No.31, District- Muzaffarpur At present posted as the Medical Officer, Muzaffarpur Municipal Corporation, Muzaffarpur. -----Petitioners. -Versus- 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Additional Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Joint Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5. The Special Officer, Mahnar Municipality at P.O. & P.S.-Mahnar, District- Vaishali. 6. The Administrator, Muzaffarpur Municipal Corporation at P.O.+ P.S. and District- Muzaffarpur. ----Respondents. ----- 4. 28.01.2009. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. There does not appear to be any error apparent on the record. Counsel for the petitioners, however, submitted that the case of the petitioners for grant of higher scale with effect from 01.04.1983 and 01.01.1986 be considered in the light of the liberty granted by the Division Bench under orders dated 26.09.2008 passed in L.P.A. No. 707 of 2008, Annexure-2. Petitioners are diploma holder Homeopathic Doctor and their prayer is to grant them higher scale which is admissible to degree-holder Homeopathic Doctor as such higher scale was allowed to one Dr. T. Ekka in compliance of the order dated 23.02.1993 passed in C.W.J.C.NO. 350 of 1993 (R ). State-Respondents have opposed such prayer and submitted - 2 - that if Dr. Ekka was allowed higher scale that may be a mistake and error and this Court in exercise of writ jurisdiction should not direct the State-Respondents to commit similar mistake in the case of the petitioners as well. Aforesaid submission of the petitioners and the State-Respondents was noticed by this Court in paragraph nos. 5 & 6 of the order dated 17.7.2008, Annexure-1 which is sought to be reviewed by filing the present application. Having heard counsel for the parties, I am satisfied that there is no error in the order dated 17.7.2008 passed in C.W.J.C.NO. 4098 of 2001,Annexure-1 muchless any error on the face of the record. In the circumstances, this review application is dismissed. U.K. (V.N.Sinha,J)