IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5299 of 2011 MUSMAT MARACHIYA & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 29.03.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the family members of the husband were granted anticipatory bail in connection with complaint case no. C-1883 of 2006 under Sections 498(A), 379 and 323 of the I.P.C. by the learned court below. It appears that they did not furnish their bail bond and a petition for extension of time was filed before the learned court below on 21.05.2010. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners went outside the State to earn livelihood hence they could not appear before the learned court below. All the three petitioners are ready to deposit Rs. 5,000/-each before the learned court below which will be invested in some fixed deposit scheme which will be subject to result of the case. 2 If such deposit is being made by the petitioners within a period of four weeks from today then the learned court below will consider the prayer for extension of time for furnishing of their bail bond in pursuance to the earlier bail order. With this observation, the application is disposed off. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)