IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33999 of 2008 MD.JIBARAIL @ MD.JIBRAIL MIAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 5.9.2008 Heard. The petitioner is not named in a case under Section 395 IPC and is in custody since 31.3.2007 without being put on test identification parade or anything being recovered from him. The fact on which the Additional Sessions Judge has dismissed the prayer for bail is that the petitioner had talked on his mobile phone with a person about the commission of the offence. The contention is that the statement is false and that the petitioner had never talked to anyone. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.3,000/-(three thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M. Jhanjharpur in Laukahi(Andhra Math)P.S.Case no.142 of 2006. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )