IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.90 OF 2005 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.90 OF 2005 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.90 OF 2005 in SUIT NO.2 OF 2001 IN PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.228 OF 1998 NO.228 OF 1998 NO.228 OF 1998 Balakram Hitkari ..Deceased Keval K. Hitkari ..Petitioner/Plaintiff And Rajesh O. Kakkar ..Caveator/Defendant ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.91 OF 2005 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.91 OF 2005 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.91 OF 2005 IN IN IN SUIT NO.1 OF 2001 SUIT NO.1 OF 2001 SUIT NO.1 OF 2001 IN IN IN PETITION NO.781 OF 1998 PETITION NO.781 OF 1998 PETITION NO.781 OF 1998 Durgadevi Hitkari ..Deceased Keval K. Hitkari ..Petitioner/Plaintiff And Rajesh O. Kakkar ..Caveator/Defendant Mr.G.R.Mulla for the Petitioner Mr.Joseph Fernandes i/b. Fed & Rashmikantfor the Caveator Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 2nd Dec., 2005 Dated : 2nd Dec., 2005 Dated : 2nd Dec., 2005 P.C. 1. The learned Advocate for the Defendant has no objection for expediting the matter. Hence the Chamber summons to that effect is allowed and disposed of. 2. Defendants to file list of documents within a week. 3. S.O. one week. (S.R.Sathe, J.)