IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 20061 of 2009. Date of Decision : April 19, 2010. Sukhdev Singh ...... Petitioner. Versus. The State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH. Present:- Mr. Amarjit Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Monica Chhibbar Sharma, DAG Punjab, for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate, for respondent No. 4. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL). Counsel for respondents No. 1 to 3, on instructions from Shri Santokh Singh, Labour Inspector, Amritsar, states that Rs. 1,14,000/-, to which the petitioner is entitled to, as per recovery certificate, stands deposited in his account, i.e., No. 3063477398 at Central Bank of India, Putlighar Branch, Amritsar. The cheque No. 123151 dated 03.02.2010 was deposited in the said account and the amount stands transferred to his account. On the basis of this, counsel for respondents No. 1 to 3 states that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Counsel for the petitioner states that he does not have any instructions in this regard. The present writ petition is disposed of in the light of the statement made by counsel for respondents No. 1 to 3 as having been rendered infructuous. However, if the said statement is found to be incorrect, liberty is granted to the petitioner to revive the writ petition. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) JUDGE April 19, 2010. sjks.