IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16286 of 2011 SURESH PRASAD, SON OF BHARAT JIWAN PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MINAPUR TURKEY, P.S.-MINAPUR, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. …..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Narain Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Gauri Shanker Gupta, APP. ----------- 02/ 09.06.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is accused of the case which has been registered under Sections 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The First Information Report was lodged on the allegation that the petitioner was raising demand of dowry and the major part of the allegation appears to be that the petitioner was impotent and he was unable to establish physical relationship with the informant. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that it is the informant who is not willing to live with the petitioner. Prayer for bail of the petitioner has been opposed by the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the informant who has submitted 2 that this Court may intervene and try to have an amicable settlement. This petition is for bail. Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody, this Court is inclined to grant bail. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/court concerned, Patna in connection with Kadam Kuan P.S. Case No. 64 of 2011. However, it is observed that it will be upon to the informant to go before the family court and pray for all the grievances which she has raised here. kksinha/- (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)