IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH JULY 2010 / 6TH SRAVANA 1932 RP.No. 680 of 2010(N) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.22373/2009 Dated 19/03/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONERS --------------------------------- 1. PANKAJAKASTHURI AYURVEDA MEDICAL COLLEGE, KILLI JUNCTION,KOLLODE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,MANAGED BY PANKAJAKASTHURI HERBAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DR.J.HAREENDRAN NAIR. 2. THE PRINCIPAL,PANKAJAKASTHURI AYURVEDA MEDICAL COLLEGE,KILLI JUNCTION,KOLLODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA SRI.N.SHAMSUL HUDA RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------- 1. GOVT.OF INDIA,REP.BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, DEPT.OF AYUSH,IRCSC,IST RED CROSS ROAD, NEW DELHI-1. 2. THE CENTRAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN MEDICINE, INSTITUTIONAL AREA,JANAKPURI,NEW DELHI-110058, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,DEPT.OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE,GOVT.SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE COMMISSIONER FOR ENTRANCE EXAMINATION, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, COMMISSIONERATE OF ENTRACE EXAMINATION,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. UNIVERSITY OF KERALA,REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR,OFFICE OF THE KERALA UNIVERSITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. MR.ARAVIND KUMAR BABU, GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC FOR UNIVERSITY MR.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN, ASG MR.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN MR.K.T.THOMAS THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- R.P.No.680 of 2010 in W.P.(C.) No.22373 of 2009 (N) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 28th day of July, 2010 O R D E R The writ petition was disposed of by judgment dated 19/03/2010 recording the submission made on behalf of the 1st respondent that it will be open to the petitioner College to make applications to the Government of India for approval in respect of the academic year 2008-09. It is stated that in pursuance to the directions in the judgment, application was made and approval has been granted. 2. In this review petition, what is stated is that the 5th respondent herein has withheld the results of the examinations written by the students, who were admitted in the academic year 2008-09 for want of approval of the Government of India, and that taking into account the fact that approval has now been granted, the respondent University should be directed to declare the results of the students. 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and R.P. No.680/2010 -2- also learned counsel appearing for the respondent University, I feel that if the petitioner College has now obtained approval of the Government of India, the respondent University should declare the results of the concerned students, if there was no other reason for withholding their results. 4. In view of the above, it is directed that on the production of a copy of the order of the Government of India granting approval for the students admitted during the academic year 2008-09, the respondent University shall declare the results, which are now withheld by them, provided there was no other reason for withholding their results. It is also directed that in the event of the delayed declaration of results in the manner as directed above, once the results are declared, if any application is made by any student for revaluation of the answer papers, the same will be entertained by the respondent University and needful shall be done, provided such applications are received within five days of declaration of results as above. With this clarification, this review petition is disposed of. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg