1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.20 OF 2009 Narendra Chandrayya Pantagani of Bombay. .. Petitioner Vs Bombay Municipal Corporation & Ors. .. Respondents -- Shri Y.R. Shah for the Petitioner. Ms A.R. Joshi for Respondent No.1. Shri S.V. Kadam along with Shobha Kharnekar and Apeksha Sharma i/by Kadam & Co. for Respondent No.2. Shri G.D. Utangale i/by Utangale & Co. for the SRA. -- CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J DATED : 19TH JANUARY, 2009 P.C. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Learned counsel appearing for the respective Respondents waive service. By consent, the Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the Appeal filed by the Petitioner is pending before the Competent Authority (SRA) and further submits that the Petitioner is willing to accept the premises as an alternate accommodation without prejudice to his rights and to his contention that he is entitled to commercial-cum-residential premises instead of commercial premises only. Learned counsel for the Respondents Authorities including the Developers have no objection to the same. Let the Petitioner vacate the premises in question within a period of two weeks from today and accept the alternate accommodation, i.e. Commercial premises, without prejudice to his rights and the Competent Authority (SRA) will decide the appeal within a period of four weeks thereafter. 3 4. The Rule is made absolute in the above terms, with no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J