IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2011 / 8TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 7870 of 2011(G) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- LISSY CHACKO.C,TEACHER,ST.GEORGES HIGH SCHOOL,THOZHIYOOR-680520. BY ADVS. SRI.A.K.CHINNAN SRI.BINU MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. CORPORATE MANAGER,ST/GEORGES HIGH SCHOOL, CUM PRINCIPAL,PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE OF M/S.MALABAR INDEPENDENT SYRIAN CHURCH,CYRIL MAR BASSELIOSE,THOZHIYOOR-680520. 2. M.C.MATHEWKUTTY,S/O.CHACKO, MEKKATTUKULAM HOUSE,CHALISSERI-679536. 3. T.K.VIJAYAKUMAR,ADVOCATE,AYYANTHOLE, TRICHUR-680 003. 4. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHAVAKKAD-680506. 5. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, CIVIL LINES,AYYANTHOLE,TRICHUR-680003. 6. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF KERALA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 7. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY(GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.C.MADHAVANKUTTY R4 TO R7 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.V. VIJULAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 7870/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE STAFF FIXATION ORDER DATED 31/07/2007. P2: COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE FOURTH RESPONDENT DATED 03/06/2008. P3: COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 01/09/2008. P4: COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE FOURTH RESPONDEDNT DATED 19/12/2008. P5: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18/07/2008 ON I.A.1611/2008 IN O.S.431/2008. P6: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 08/07/2009 IN CMA.122/2008. P7: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 03/07/2009 IN WPC.18683/2009. P8: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 26/08/2009 OF 5TH RESPONDEDNT. P9: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 31/05/2010 OF 6TH RESPONDEDNT. P10: COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DATED 05/09/2010. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.7870/2011-G ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 29th day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the light of the order passed by the Government, the writ petition can be closed as infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. All the legal questions raised in the writ petition are left open. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms