1 RP-(ST.) 1690.2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO. 1690 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 1148 OF 1997 (Atmaram S/o Ambuji Ingle VS. Walmi through its Director General and ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. M.A. Manjaramkar, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. V.D. Rakh, A.G.P. for the respondent-State ... CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 12.09.2011 P.C.:- 1. Review Petition is taken on Board. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel submits that this Court while dismissing the Petition has not considered the aspect of seniority properly. He submits that though respondents nos. 4 and 5 were junior to the petitioner, this Court has held that they were not junior to the petitioner. 3. This Court by giving detailed reasons, has found that the 2 RP-(ST.) 1690.2007 petitioner was not senior to the respondent nos. 4 and 5 and as such dismissed the Petition. If the petitioner is aggrieved by such an order, the recourse is by way of challenge before the Apex Court and not by way of Review. 4. No error apparent on the fact of record is noticed to warrant invoking the review jurisdiction. Review Petition rejected. Sd/- Sd/- arp [M. T. JOSHI, J. ] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]