IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44147 of 2009 ANIL BHAGAT Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 4/ 30.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that though it is a triple murder case but none of the eye witnesses is naming this petitioner having any overt act. Hearsay witnesses are naming him but not as assailant rather either conspirator or protector of accused persons. Sunaina Devi is shown actively ordering to kill but she has already been allowed bail vide B.A. No. 533 of 2009, as contained in Annexure-2 to the application, by the Lower Court. Taking that into consideration, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Salkhua P.S. Case No. 131 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saharsa subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)