IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 13534 of 2008 Between: 1.Bynaboina Venkata Subbaiah S/o Penchalaiah R/o Nallathimmaiahpalli(V), Nandalur (M), Kadapa District. 2.Bandi Narasamma W/o Venkataiah, R/o Ramanjaneyapuram (V), Kadapa Mandal & District. 3.Binaboina Penchalaiah S/o Narasaiah R/o Nallathimmaiahpalli (V), Nandalure (M), kadapa District. 4.Chinthamreddy Venkata Subba Reddy S/o Chenchi Reddy R/o Nadimpalli(V), Vontimitta Mandal, kadapa District. 5.Iruvuri Chinnaiah S/o Yellaiah R/o Mochampet (V), kadapa Mandal & District. 6.Uppaturu Chinna Venkata Subbaiah S/o yellaiah R/o Mochampet (V), Kadapa Mandal & District. 7.Choppadandu Hussain Saheb S/o Nayar Saheb r/o Kontarapalli (V) Vontimitta (M), Kadapa District. 8.Bondi Tirupaiah S/o Venkataiah, R/o Ramanjaneyapuram(V), kadapa Mandal & district. 9.Binaboina Venkata Subbamma W/ Ramanaiah R/o Nallathimmaiahpalli(V), Nandalur (M), Kadapa District. 10.Choppadandu Dastagiri Saheb S/o Ibrahim Saheb, R/o Badvel Town, Gopavaram (M), Kadapa district. 11.Chintamreddy Venkata Subba Reddy Legal representative and s/o Chin Chintamreddy Chenchi Reddy (died) R/o Nadimpalli(V), Vontimitta (M), Kadapa District. 12.Chintamreddy Venkata Subbamma W/o Venkata Subba Reddy, R/o Nadimpalli(V), Vontimitta (M), Kadapa District 13.Upputuru Venkata Subbaiah Legal representative and S/o of U. Chinna Gangulaiah (died) R/o Near Mazid, Badavel Town, Gopavaram (M), Kadapa District. 14.Upputuru Venkata Subbaiah Legal representative and S/o of Upputuru Yallamma (died) R/o Near Mazid, Badavel Town, Gopavaram (M), Kadapa District. 15.Poolathota Chinna Penchalaiah S/o Subbaiah R/o Near Mazid Badvel Town, Gopavaram(M), Kadapa district. 16.Poolathota Penchalaiah S/o Subbaiah R/o Varikoota (V), Atlur (M), Kadapa District. 17.Malinenipatnam Ratnam S/o Subbaiah R/o ITI City, Kadapa, Kadapa District. 18.Aavula Venkata Subbaiah S/oi Yellaiah R/o Nandipalli Gollapalli (V), Brahmangarimatham (M), Kadapa District. 19.Malinenipatnam narayana S/o Venkateswarlu R/o Badvel Town, Badvel (M), Kadapa District. 20.A. Rajakumari W/o Konda Reddy R/o Sankarapuram (V) Kadapa (M) Kadapa District. 21.A. Bhagyamma W/o raja Reddy R/o Sankarapuram (V), Kadapa (M), Kdapa District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Special Collector, Galeru Nagari Srujala Sravanthi Kadapa, kadapa District. 2 The Special Deputy Collector (LA), TGP Unit-II, Kadapa, Kadapa District- cum-the Land Acquisition Officer. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus under article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the inaction of the respondents in re-determining the compensation of the house properties of the petitioners in terms of the order in LAOP No. 219/99 dated 06-02-2002 despite the applications being submitted the petitioners under section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act while re-determine the compensation of similarly placed persons in award No. 3/2007 (u/s. 28-A) dated 31-12-2007 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Article 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also contrary to sections 28-A of the Land Acquisition act and offends article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to re-determine the compensation payable to the house properties of the petitioners under section 28-A of the Act. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.P.SRIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No.13534 of 2008 ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that against the order in L.A.O.P.No.219 of 1999, dated 06.02.2002, an appeal is pending before this Court and therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to institute fresh proceedings, in case necessity thereof arises. Accordingly, granting leave and liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. _______________ 16.07.2008 VGB