IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No.3436 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision: 23.11.2011 Satish Kumar and others ......Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for the appellants. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Counsel for the appellants has submitted before this Court that similar appeals filed on behalf of the claimants arising out of the same acquisition have already been dismissed by this Court vide judgment dated 11.5.2011 passed in RFA No.541 of 2010 titled as “Maya and others versus State of Haryana.” For the reasons recorded in the aforesaid appeal, this appeal is ordered to be dismissed. November 23, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No.3438 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision: 23.11.2011 Daya Chand and others ......Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for the appellants. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Counsel for the appellants has submitted before this Court that similar appeals filed on behalf of the claimants arising out of the same acquisition have already been dismissed by this Court vide judgment dated 11.5.2011 passed in RFA No.541 of 2010 titled as “Maya and others versus State of Haryana.” For the reasons recorded in the aforesaid appeal, this appeal is ordered to be dismissed. November 23, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No.3437 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision: 23.11.2011 Lal Singh and others ......Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for the appellants. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Counsel for the appellants has submitted before this Court that similar appeals filed on behalf of the claimants arising out of the same acquisition have already been dismissed by this Court vide judgment dated 11.5.2011 passed in RFA No.541 of 2010 titled as “Maya and others versus State of Haryana.” For the reasons recorded in the aforesaid appeal, this appeal is ordered to be dismissed. November 23, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No.3514 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision: 23.11.2011 Lekh Raj and others ......Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana and another ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate for the appellants. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Counsel for the appellants has submitted before this Court that similar appeals filed on behalf of the claimants arising out of the same acquisition have already been dismissed by this Court vide judgment dated 11.5.2011 passed in RFA No.541 of 2010 titled as “Maya and others versus State of Haryana.” For the reasons recorded in the aforesaid appeal, this appeal is ordered to be dismissed. November 23, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE