1 o )8<%60I(/ IN 'IHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 2&5 OF 2004 PETIHOER£ 1. Thanuram Kunjam, , V . aged 36 years, son of Bhanwar Singh Kunjam, R/o. Village Rajisara, Block, Charama, District Kanker (C.G.) . Phul Singh Nishad, aged 53 years, son of Bisambhar Nishad, R/o. Basanwahi, Charama, istt. Kanker. . State ofChhattisgarh ,through Semetary, Scheduled Caotes and Scheduled Tlibes Development Dopartment, Mantralay'a, D.K_.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) ‘ Commissioner ’ ’ Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tn‘bes Development Deparunent, Raipu: (C.G.) Collector, Kanker (C .G .) mm“ w WRIT PETITION UNDER AR'Ilcm 226 2 V OF‘ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CER’HORARY LNQIOR ANY O’IHER SUITABLE WRIT OF LHIE NATURE \\\ The petitioners most resoectfully submitiavs under:— ’ '5? x’ PAR'ncULAns OF m3 Pathogens The peiitioners are working as Assistant Teachers in o di%rent schools and they have been transferred by a oonunonvorder; : D : ¢ XI—HCuZZ Wm ‘ MNo240j mfg m 311%?! m mm m Efim 31mm ma WW as 1mm? 31m aim wm 20~8~2004 k KW¢@W/ #vf/V Petitioner by Shh State by Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Advocate General. Head, This baz/ih of gases rela1e to tremsfcr 0f the petitioners from their respective Dlaces. Ceunsei for ihe pexilioneyS submi xed that the transfer of the petitiQne§s has been effected illegallv in CQnlravention of law And policv. State counsel opposed it State counse} submitted that the petitioners have straightway fiied :he pexiiiens without serving notice for demand ofjus§i‘ce and representation Having heard and considered ti‘ke rival contention; wirhouz expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in the‘opinion of this Com: ends of iustiee wiii be served if a direction is given to the petitioners to make detaiied representation raising their grievances and goumis before the State Governfnent/competent authority of the respondents along with a copy of the petition and this order, Within 10 days and on such representation being filed, the State Govemmenticempetent authority of the respondents under the law. shall consider and decioe he same on its mm merits in accortlanee with “n *5 law as early as possible preferably within six weeks from the date ofreceipttproduciion t of the representation. if any contravention of policy or guidelines is brought to the ‘ notice; the same be considered on its own merits. Counsel for the petitioners pray that after the decision ofthe representation ifany i, grievance of the petitioners remains they may be allowed to avail the remedy available under the law. They may avail the remedy available under the law. v / With the aforesaid observations. this petition stands disposed of. l? Consequently MW’P... if any. alst stands disposed of, Certified copy as per rules. f Sdl- U Copy to State, counsel for complia ice. .» Fakhruddin ' Judge Pathak y - Qewvle‘i t ' {€73 WI, i.