FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 75 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 75 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 75 OF 2005 WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 76 OF 2005. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 76 OF 2005. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 76 OF 2005. WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 77 OF 2005. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 77 OF 2005. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 77 OF 2005. ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders appearnaces,Courts’s : orders or directions : and Registrar’s orders. : ------------------------------------------------------------ Shri V.G. Peshave for the Applicants. Shri Anil Subramaniam for Respondent No.1 Shri U.V. Nikam, APP for the State. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATED: 14TH NOVEMBER 2006. DATED: 14TH NOVEMBER 2006. DATED: 14TH NOVEMBER 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard learned Advocate appearing for the Applicants and the learned Advocate for the 1st Respondent. Learned APP appears for the 2nd Respondent-State. 2. In view of the decision of the of the learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of V.K. Jain vs/ Pratap V. Patode 2005 (3) Mh.L.J.778, the learned Advocate for the Applicants seeks permission to withdraw these applications with liberty to file revision applications before the appropriate Sessions Court for challenging the order issuing process. 3. Learned Advocate appearing for the Applicants invited my attention to the peculiar facts of the case and he stated that the delay in filing revision applications should not come in the way of the Applicants. Learned Advocate for the 1st Respondent fairly stated that if Applicants prefer revision applications before the appropriate Sessions Court within 5 weeks from today, the 1st Respondent will not object to prayer for condonation of delay. Statement is accepted. 4. Learned Advocate for the Applicants prayed that the ad-interim relief granted by this Court be continued for a reasonable time to enable the Applicants to apply for appropriate interim relief in the revision applications. 5. Applications are disposed of by following order: (i) The applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. (ii) Statement made by the 1st Respondent which is recorded above is accepted. (iii) Ad-interim relief granted by this Court on 8th September, 2005 will continue to operate for 8 weeks from today. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE