1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No. 630 of 2011 JITENDRA SUNDERLAL SHAHU VERSUS STATE OF MAH. THRU. SECRETARY, DEPTT OF HOME, MUMBAI AND OTHERS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Prashant A. Gode, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. A. S. Fulzele, A.P.P. for the respondents CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND P.B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : 07th DECEMBER, 2011. Mr. Fulzele, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents states on instructions that the notice impugned in the present petition would be withdrawn today itself by the respondents. We accept the aforesaid statement has an undertaking to the Court. In the light of the said statement, Mr.Gode, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this writ petition as the withdrawal of the impugned notice would render the reliefs sough for by the petitioner in this petition as infructuous. The criminal writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn, accepting the statement made by the learned A.P.P. as an undertaking to the Court. In the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE Diwale