Criminal Misc. No. M-15507 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-15507 of 2011 Date of decision: 31.05.2011. Neelam Arora and another ..Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Ms. Supriya Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Satyavir Singh Yadav, D.A.G., Haryana, for respondent No.1 – State. Mr. C.S. Rana, Advocate, for respondent No.2. NAWAB SINGH, J. (ORAL) On the complaint filed by Sushma Goel- respondent No.2, First Information Report (for short 'FIR) No.199 dated October 7th, 2003 (Annexure P-1), was registered under Sections 420 and 468/120-B of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') in Police Station Kalka, District Panchkula, against the petitioners. During the pendency of the case, the parties have compromised the matter. On the basis of the said compromise, present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed seeking quashing of the aforesaid FIR. Compromise- deed (Annexure P-4) has been placed on record. The dispute between the parties was of personal nature. In view of this, there should not be any impediment in allowing the parties to compromise the matter. Support to this view can be had from the authority 'Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab' 2008 (2) RCR (Criminal) Criminal Misc. No. M-15507 of 2011 2 429, wherein, Hon'ble Supreme Court has ruled that in such type of cases, where the dispute is of personal nature, Court should ordinarily, accept the compromise. In this view of the matter, the petition is accepted, FIR No.199 dated October 7th, 2003 (Annexure P-1), registered under Sections 420 and 468/120-B IPC in Police Station Kalka, District Panchkula and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 31.05.2011 neetu