IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6931 of 2010 RABINDRA KUMAR SON OF SRI RAM KISHAN PERMANENT RESIDENT OF MOHALLA KHOJA BAZAR, P.O. & P.S. MUNGER, DISTRICT MUNGER, AT PRESENT RESIDENT OF MOHALLA RAJA S. N. ROAD, MASHAKCHAK, P.S. ADAMPUR IN THE TOWN AND DISTRICT OF BHAGALPUR. Versus 1. THE PANJAB NATIONAL BANK THROUGH THE BRANCH MANAGER, BHAGALPUR BAZAR BRANCH AT BHAGALPUR. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, BHAGALPUR BAZAR BRANCH, BHAGALPUR. 3. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK (UNDER THE SARFAESI ACT) BHAGALPUR BAZAR BRANCH, BHAGALPUR. 4. SMT. SEEMA SINGH WIFE OF SHRI VIVEKANAND RESIDENT OF RAJA S. N. ROAD, MASHAKCHAK, P.S. ADAMPUR IN THE TOWN AND DISTRICT OF BHAGALPUR. 5. SRI VIVEKANAND SON OF LATE LALDHAN PRASAD SINGH @ LALDHAN SINGH RESIDENT OF RAJA S. N. ROAD, MASHAKCHAK, P.S. ADAMPUR DISTRICT BHAGALPUR. ----------- 2 22/04/2010 It is the stand of the petitioner that he is the tenant in the house in question and he has advanced certain valuable consideration to one Vivekanand with an understanding that ultimately the house would be sold to the present petitioner but it seems that he has duped both the petitioner as well as the Bank. Now a notice under section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act has been issued against the so called wife of Vivekanand. Submission of the learned counsel is that he is - 2 - willing to re-pay the outstanding dues of the respondent Bank provided he is satisfied with regard to the right, title and interest. The Court has nothing to adjudicate on such an issue. It is the petitioner who is to carry out with due diligence and approach the respondent Bank for the same who is the appropriate authority to resolve the issue. With the observation aforesaid, this writ application is disposed of. AMIN (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)