,^? \^. r J» >i IN THE HON'BLE HI6H CQUKT^F^^HATTISGAR^ ATBILASPUR WJ'^51 N0. G^?>_ ^f 2009 PETITEONER ^y.- '^^.-^' <^ RESPONDENTS Panchram Mishra S/o Late Shri Chhedilal Mishra , aged about 64 years, R/o Indira Vihar, Bandhwapara, Near Satbahnia Mandir, Sarkanda, Working as retired forester , Divisional office Bilaspur Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERStJS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Thr-ough : Its Secretary, Department of Forest, b.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.6.) 2. The Divisional Forest Officer, (t)FO) Bilaspur Forest Division, Bilaspur (c.e.) , 3. . The Joint .Oirector, (Treasuries, Accounts' and Pension) Bilaspur . Division, Bilaspur (C.£.) 4. , The t)istrictTreasuryofficer, bistt. Bilaspur (C.&.) WRTT PETITCON UNt)ER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTETUTION OF IN&IA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/OROER AN& DIRECTION .i^Utbll) ^-1 ^u ^^j ^%T r^a iFi i^-'L^.Ue^a ^w»i ULASS Writ Petition (S) No. of 2i 'ETmONER n Mlshra versus State of ChhaSisgarh & Othsi iWrit Petltion under Article 226 of the Constitution of tndia) 3^3 le snn ih Present: Shri SaTissf BBhar, counss' forthe petitlonsr. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dv. Adv. Qsnera! for the State. (Passed on thls 23 day of Novem With the consent of iearned counsei for tt heard finaiiv. mo' les, the petition is Lssrned counsei appearing for the pstitioner submits that the csse, being pSyiT'SHI O) i£Z!f33 OSiiaTfi.S'. .HISIISf, . iHsy o^ rs' EO ine pe ^wr'nv^w. W.P.No.1961/2006 (Si This Court, in the ,1-atter ofW.P.No.4842/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhatlisgarh & others) ana' other connectsd rnatters, directsd the Committse to conslder the matter of retlrat duss, as the dssputed question of facts were invoived. The Commiaee was constituted by the State Governmeni, oursuant to the ordsr dated 19-06-2006 cassed 'm Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), and order dated 13-3-2008 passed m M.C.C. No. 105 c.f 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh and othere Vs. Baijnath ?»1andal and another). Thus, this petition is squareiy covered by the judgment and order dated 31" January, 2008 passed in Baijnath r.'landai (supra), as submitted by tearned counsei appearing fcr ths parties. T'nis petition is accordingiy disposed of !n She same tsrms i.e., the office of the Advocate Genera! is directed io send the case to the Conimittee, Z-- (. B. Tumane within a oeriod of 15 davs from the date of receiot of a coov of this order as Vi/sil as acopy of the petition from {he petiiioner. Thereafter, the Committee shai! issue notics to the petitsoner and officere concerned within n further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with iaw, after affording proper opportunity of hsaring to ths petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additionai documents, if necsssary. The entire exereiss, inciudiny payment of Tstirai dues, if any, to the petltioner, be compieted within a period of four months from the dste of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shaH supply one compiete set ofthe petition to the State counsel for transferrina the same to the Commltlee. in case of grievance with regard to non-payment of pensionery dues, it is not necessary to file a writ petition before this Court directiy. „ Ths representation/'application can be moved before the Pension Comrr.ittee as stated above. The Pension Committee shali not refuss to entsrtain the representation/appiication, if so fiied directiy. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge J- '^'