1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. WRIT PETITION NO. 11612 OF 2010 (Gopichand Bhika Chaudhari and ors. VS. Tukaram Bhika Chaudhari) Mr. A.G. Magre, Advocate for the petitioner Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders P.C.:- 1. Heard Advocate Shri Magre for the petitioner. He contends that in a suit for defamation, after examination-in-chief of plaintiff, the documents are permitted to be filed and it causes serious prejudice to the petitioner. He points out that documents were already with the possession of plaintiff and there is no just and sufficient reason for its belated production. 2. Perusal of the impugned order reveals that documents produced are certified copies and trial Court has found the same necessary for adjudication of controversy. The plaintiff is still not cross-examined by petitioner-defendant. 2 3. I do not see any jurisdictional error or perversity and no prejudice is caused to the petitioner. I am not inclined to interfere. Petition rejected. No costs. Sd/- DT. : 04.03.2011 [B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.] arp