THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WP No. 15918 of 2011 ORDER: The writ petitioner is a registered association. It bears the following title: “ Arya Gouda Ediga Assocaiation bearing Society No. 114/1980”. It is registered as such under the provisions of the Registration of Societies Act XXI of 1860. It was registered on 4.7.1980. Its registered office is noticed as H. No. 6-30-6, Srisailam Project. The grievance of this association in this writ petition is that the 1st respondent – District Registrar of Societies has accorded registration to another society with the following title: “Arya Gouda, Ediga, (Koundinya) Nitya Annasadana Satra Seva Samithi” This society is registered under Societies Registration Act, Act 35 of 2001. I am not able to comprehend as to how the registration of the 2nd respondent – society by the 1st respondent is objectionable in any manner. The 2nd respondent is clearly identifiable by its primary objective as is reflected in its title itself i.e., Nitya Annadana Sathra Seva which when translated into English, it means, providing free food and shelter. That could be one of the objectives for which the petitioner – association could also been formed. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner requests permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. But, however, without costs. --------------------------------- Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J knk 13th June 2011