IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14030 of 2006 MOST. GAYA DEVI, Wife of Late Mehtar Ravidas, Resident of Village Abhaipur (Kasba) P.S.- Piri Bazar, District – Lakhisarai. …… Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The District Magistrate, Munger. 3. The District Treasury Officer, Munger. 4. The District Provident Fund Officer, Munger. 5. The Block Development Officer, Dharhara, District- Munger. 6. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. …….. Respondents ----------- 2 28.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Narsingh Tanti and Sri Rajesh Kumar Sinha, learned A.C. to Govt. Pleader No. 21, who appears on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 5 and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Accountant General. The present writ petition has been filed with a prayer to direct the respondents to make payment of G.P.F. and consequential retrial benefits such as Revised Pay Scale and Assured Career Progression Scheme (A.C.P.) to the petitioner who is wife of Late Mehtar Ravidas. The husband of the petitioner retired as ‘Panchayat Sewak’ with effect from 30.06.2001. From the pleading it appears that after retirement the husband of the petitioner approached this court by filing a writ petition vide C.W.J.C. No. 4445 of 2002 for the claim of his retrial dues. The same was heard and disposed of on 14.10.2004 on the submission made on behalf of the petitioner that all the retrial dues was paid and grievances were redressed. Copy of order dated 14.10.2004 has been enclosed as ‘Annexure-1’ to the writ petition. In this case, counter affidavit has also been filed on 2 behalf of the Treasury Officer, Munger. In view of the fact that the main person i.e. husband of the petitioner had already approached this court for retrial dues and it was admitted at Bar that all the retrial dues were cleared and grievances were redressed, and since the writ petition was disposed of, at subsequent stage, the present writ petition was filed. The court is of the opinion that since reitral dues were already paid which is evident from ‘Annexure-1’, no relief can be granted to the petitioner. The writ petition stands dismissed. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)