: 1 : 3595-11-wp=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3595 OF 2011 Arvind Kumar Lalchand Jain .. Petitioner v/s. Mrs. Chandralekha Vimal Shukla & Ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3640 OF 2011 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3641 OF 2011 Pravinkumar Lalchand Jain .. Petitioner v/s. Mrs. Chandralekha Vimal Shukla & Ors. .. Respondents ......... Ms. Meenakshi Sakhare i/b M/.s Jhangiani Narula & Associates for the petitioner Ms. S.A. Mudbidri for respondent no.2 Mr. S.D. Rairikar, AGP for respondent no.3 ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J DATE : 14th SEPTEMBER,2011. P.C. : 1. These petitions were not shown on board on 6th September, 2011 with companion Writ Petition No.3643 of 2011. : 2 : 3595-11-wp=.sxw 2. The aforesaid Writ Petition No.3643 of 2011 was heard and disposed of by speaking order dated 6th September, 2011, when learned advocates on both sides were present before the Court. 3. Today, this Court is informed that the points involved in the aforesaid three petitions, which are called out today, are just the same as the one covered by the Writ Petition No.3643 of 2011. After having considered the points involved, I am inclined to pass order similar to the one which was passed in Writ Petition No.3643 of 2011. These three petitions stand disposed of accordingly. Time to dispose of the respective suits is extended upto 31st March, 2012. 4. It is clarified that in order dated 6th September, 2011 on account of typographical mistake, time to decide the suit was extended upto 31st March, 2011, which should be read as 31st March, 2012. These three petitions stand disposed of accordingly. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)