I WW W,W mmwma Singie Bench: i3 W} (Petition U/A '. [Si No.6051i2W8 ' 226 of Constitution of india) eetendra Kumar Khobragade, son of PIG. rhobragade, aged about 39 years, working as rest. Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary School §anyari, Block Thakhatpur, District Bilasour, :hhattisgarhi ijeet Kumar Kujur, Son of Samuel Kujur, aged bout 4’i years, working a3 Asst. Teacher, Govt. iigher Secondary SohooL Koni, Biook Biiha, )istrict Biiaspur, Chhattisgarh. imt. Manjula William, wife of Late Mr. S. ViHiam, aged about 4O years, working as Asst. eaoher, éovt. Higher Secondary Schooi, Sakri, Hock Thakhatpur, :hhatiisgarh. lajesh Sahu son of C l Sahu, aged about 38 ears, working as Asst. Teacher, Govt. Higher Koni. 2ajkumar Gupta, son of Late RR. Gupta, aged bout 38 years, working as Asst. Teacher, Govt. ligher Secondary School Kuddudan, District §ilaspur, Chhattisgarh ;tate Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary lchool E‘duoation Department, Ministry, DKS. ihawan, Distt: ~ Raipur (CG) 'he District Education Officer Bilaspur Distt. iiiaspur (CG) iecondary School, :hhaitisgarh. District iu Piesent MriAmit Kumar Sharma, Advocate \ Mr. MP8. Bhatia, Dy. Gevt. Adv, 03. 1 1 .2638 Heard. for the petitioners. for the State. Ww$ ................. mzoo am m (W) Biiaspur, District Biiaspur, mm#w $wma on’bie Mr. Justice Dhifendra Mishr’ag m ?ET§T§0NERS 1. J k £ C C 2. £ a F E 3. E \z T E C 4. F \/ E C 5. F e I. E Vs RESPONDENT5 1. E E E 2. ‘l F a mam‘rm mmm was m (estates) mmm anéeT I Z, maml¥%@mn asWwrcm The petitioners by this petiti passing of D.Ed.fB‘T.l./M.Ed, exar circuiar of Ahmexure T11 daied 24.11 Learned counsei for the peti petitions were decided by this Cour No.41 3OIO5 whereby the petitions v in the matter of Yashwant Kumai and. another reported in 290$ (11) to whether the petitioners have act expenses as per circular dated 24.’ two advance increments or not. On the other hand, learned r tile representation in this regardl th deiivered in Yashwant Kumar Bhara in view of the above subn petition is disposed of with iibertv respondent No.1 raising ail theii representation being made; respon light of the Yashwant Kumar Bhar weeks from the date of receipt of c this order. Certified copy as per rules on are claiming two increments from the date of aination with all arrears and to fix pay as per 2.1QQ8. :ioners submits that in the similar matter bunch of t vide order dated 15.122066 passed in WP. (s) ere disposed of in terms of decision of this Court ' Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporatton, Durg “NR-CG S6; subject to verification of the fact as quired B.Edt/B.T.i,/D.Ed. certificates at their own 2.1998 and further whether they have been paid Lounsel for the State submits that it the petitioners e same shatl be decided in the light ofjudgment dwaj’s case. iissions of teamed counsel for the parties, this to the petittoners to make representation before grievances raised in this petition, On such :tent Not shall decide the same expeditiously in dwaj’s case preferabty within a period of eight opy of representation along with certmed copy of 1 i Sd/- Dhirendra Mishrai‘ i i l i Judge \ mmm ....... ........ sizoo .....................