IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 56/2009 (Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation and another vrs. Smt. Ashabai Shriram Pande and others) ................................................................................................................................................... ...... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................... ...... Shri V.G.Palshikar, counsel for petitioner Shri S.A.Dantale, counsel for Respondent No.1 Shri Mujumdar, AGP, for Respondent NO.2. ... CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 14th DECEMBER, 2010. Shri S.A.Dantale, the learned counsel, appears for respondent no.1/ plaintiff and makes a statement that an application has been moved before the trial Court for deleting the names of petitioner nos. 1 and 2 and the respondent no. 2 – State of Maharashtra through Collector, Nagpur, as party defendant nos. 1, 2 and 3 and if that application is allowed, the revision application would become infructuous. Shri Palshikar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that they have no objection if their names are deleted from the array of defendants in R.C.S. No. 168/2008, in which the order impugned has been passed. In view of the aforesaid position, the C.R.A., is dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Rvjalit