IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.493 OF 2008 AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.811 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1013 OF 2006 Mr.Fazal Kasamali Jafer )..Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra )..Respondent ---- Ms.Kranti S.S.Anand for the applicant. Mr.A.S.Shitole APP for the respondent/State. ---- Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Date : 1st August, 2008. PC CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.493 OF 2008 1. This is an application for return of certain documents which are lying in the court record. The documents are specified in paragraph no.3. One of them is international credit card. Then there are some membership cards, visiting cards and photographs. They are specified as articles 2 & 5 in paragraph no.3 of the application. Learned APP states that he has no objection if zerox true copies are maintained on the Court’s record. In the circumstances, application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause-(a) but these documents will be : 2 : returned only after zerox copies are taken and certified to be the true copies by the Advocate for the applicant. The original of these documents will be returned to the applicant and will be liable to be returned back if so directed by the Court. All the zeroxing will be done prior to the handing of the documents and will be at the cost of the applicant. Office of the Sessions Court will arrange for the zeroxing. Application stands disposed off. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.811 OF 2008 1. This is an application seeking return of passport for permission to go abroad. The applicant states in the application that he is required to go abroad in connection with his business. Today, an amended copy of Exhibit-A which is a schedule containing his addresses, stay and telephone numbers are given. Leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out in the course of the day. Amended copy is taken on record. 2. It appears from the record that earlier also applicant was permitted by this Court vide order dated 29.4.2008 to go abroad subject to the term as mentioned in the order. Learned APP admits that the applicant returned on time and deposited his passport. In the circumstances, application is : 3 : allowed in terms of prayer clauses-(a) & (b). The applicant will return back to India on or before 12th October 2008 and within one week of his return he will re-submit his passport back to the trial Court. Advocate for the applicant states that security deposit made as per earlier order dated 29.4.2008 was not taken back. If the deposit is still in existence, the same to remain as a deposit until further orders of this Court. If however, deposit has been taken back, then fresh deposit has to be made. If deposit continues, no fresh deposit to be insisted upon. Application stands disposed off. (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J)