CWP No.22864 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.22864 of 2011 Date of decision: 9.12.2011 Ranu Ram ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. M.K. Dogra, Advocate for the petitioner. Rajan Gupta, J (oral). Only grievance of the petitioner is that he has been denied the benefit in terms of judgment, Annexure P-7. According to counsel, case of the petitioner is covered by ratio of said judgment but same has not been taken into consideration. Notice of motion. On asking of the court, Mr. B.S. Chahal, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of State of Punjab. He submits that no representation has been received from the petitioner with regard to his claim. However, in case any representation is preferred within two months from today, appropriate decision shall be taken thereon. He further submits that liberty may be granted to the State to pass appropriate order in the event of claim suffering from delay/laches and/or if it is found distinguishable. In view of statement made by the State counsel, no further CWP No.22864 of 2011 2 orders are required to be passed. Disposed of with liberty to the State as prayed for. It is, however, directed that in case any representation is made by the petitioner, same shall be decided expeditiously and in accordance with law, preferably within a period of four months. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 9.12.2011 'rajpal'