((-1-)) MST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.1329 OF 1993 The MTNL Plaintiff versus Bipin B. Shah Defendant Ms.Bharti Thakkar for plaintiff. None for defendant. AND SUIT NO.1442 OF 1993 The MTNL Plaintiff versus Mrs.Hansa T. Shah Defendant Ms.Bharti Thakkar i/by J.R.Thakkar for plaintiff None for defendant. AND SUIT NO.1582 OF 1993 MTNL Plaintiff Vs. Shahikant T. Malewar Defendant Parties and advocates absent. AND SUIT NO.1584 OF 1993 MTNL Plaintiff Vs. P.H.Ganatra & another Defendants Parties and advocates absent. AND SUIT NO.1626 OF 1993 Meena Vijay Shah Plaintiff versus M.T.N.L. Defendant A.M.Talreja for plaintiff. ((-2-)) MST None for defendant. AND SUIT NO.1654 OF 1993 The M.T.N.L. Plaintiff versus Premmon Thaikkad Defendant Ms.B.J.Thakkar i/by J.Thakkar for plaintiff. None for defendants. AND SUIT NO.1690 OF 1993 M.T.N.L. Plaintiff versus Ramkumar R. Ghadiali Defendant Parties and advocates absent. AND SUIT NO.1749 OF 1993 The M.T.N.L. Plaintiff versus Mohammed Mehdoom Defendant Ms.Bharti Thakkar i/by Ms.Jyoti Thakkar for plaintiff. None for defendant. AND SUIT NO.1751 OF 1993 The M.T.N.L. Plaintiff versus Shaikh Mubarak Husain Defendant Ms.Bharti Thakkar i/by J.R.Thakkar for plaintiff None for defendant. AND SUIT NO.1811 OF 1993 M.T.N.L. Plaintiff versus Haji Ebrahim Salemohmed Defendant Ms.J.N.Pandhi i/by S.I.Shah for plaintiff. ((-3-)) MST None for defendant. AND SUIT NO.1829 OF 1993 The M.T.N.L. Plaintiff versus A.H.Gopani Defendant Mr.Bharti Thakkar with J.R.Thakkar for plaintiff None for defendant. AND SUIT NO.2155 OF 1993 M.T.N.L. Plaintiff versus Raj Lekhraj Nairyani Defendant Ms.J.N.Pandhi i/by S.I.Shah for plaintiff. None for defendant. AND SUIT NO.2415 OF 1993 M.T.N.L. Plaintiff versus M/s.Haly Fisheries Defendant None present for parties. AND SUIT NO.2444 OF 1993 Sheth Vallabh Natwarlal Plaintiff versus M.T.N.L. Defendant None present. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATE : 30th January 2008 PC : 1. These suits pertain to the year 1993. The plaintiffs in these suits have still not filed ((-4-)) MST affidavit of service. When the matters are called out today counsel for the plaintiffs seek time to do the needful. Plaintiffs are granted four weeks time. It is made clear that if the affidavits of service are not filed within four weeks from today, the suit(s) to stand dismissed for non prosecution without further reference to the Court. If steps are taken in time, the matters be listed on 27th February 2008. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)