@jij;js-5S ff RP''tAt-l ,1^3; ^ .f..-.—«•'•"- - ••" • ^7 ^- F 1 -D-0 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT OF 2007 PETITIONER: %' .^^ ...•••"^r ,<Iy,,{^'. ..^' ^••-".^e1-'-^-:./' ^•^^' .--\'^'\fa./" ^'•' <tll.^'. I^SPONDENTS : ^pf- ^> K. P. Mishra, S/o Late Shri Premanand Mishra, aged about 55 years, presently posted as Accountant, Nagar Palika Parishad, Mungeli, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Versus 1. ^" State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary, Department of Urban Administration & Development, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Additional Secretary, Department of Urban Administration & Development, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Commissioner, Urban Administration & Developmerit Department, Directorate at Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Dy. Director, Urban Administration & Development, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Nagar Palika Parishad, Mungeli, through Chief Municipal Officer, Mungeli,. Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR Sinqle Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker PETITIONER Writ Petition (S) No. 360 of K.P. Mishra Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisaarh & others 01- Shri B.D. Guru, counsel forthe netitioner Shri Shashank Thskur, Pauci Lavuycr for thc State/respondents No. 1 to 4. Shri N.P. Koshtha, counsei for respondent No.5. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTSON OF IND!A ORDER (OS.07.2009) With the consent of the parties; the matter is heard flnally. Chailenae in the instant writ petition is to the order dated 23.12-2006 (Annexure-P-1) passed bv State Government wherebv the petitioner was transferred from the post of Accountant in Nagar Palika Parishad Mungeli; Distt. Bilaspur to the Naaa^ Palike Parishad Bade Bacheii, in violation of the transfer policv. This Couri: entertainina the arievance of the petitioner had qranted stav in his favour vide order dated 23.1.2007. In view of the fact that this petition was filed on 10.1.2007 and stav was also aranted in favour of the petitioner, the transfer order, so far as it relates to the petitioner is hereby quashed- However; the State Government would be at liberty to pass an order if the administrative exiaencv sB warrant. With the above observation, the petition stands disposed of Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge