1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.710 of 2006. Smt. Ramavtari Devi & Another Versus Smt. Afroz Begum & Another IN THE HIGH COURT OF JJDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.710 of 2006. Smt. Ramavtari Devi widow of late Shri Prabhu Dayal Somani & Another Versus Smt. Afroz Begum wife of late Shri Matin Ahmed and Another Date of Order :::: 30/07/2009 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Mr. Manish Sharma, Counsel for the Petitioners Mr. J.R. Tantia, Counsel for the Respondents Per Court : Heard learned counsel for the parties. By the impugned order the application filed by the defendants under Order 6 Rule 17, C.P.C. for amendment of the written-statement has been dismissed. The copy of the said application has been filed as Annexure-1. In the application, it was submitted that the amendment has been necessitated on account of subsequent event, inasmuch as, the subsequent suit has been filed by the 2 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.710 of 2006. Smt. Ramavtari Devi & Another Versus Smt. Afroz Begum & Another plaintiff for eviction. The amendment, which was sought by way of Para 8-K was with regard to the relief in the present suit having been waived on account of the filing of the subsequent event. Learned trial Court by the impugned order in Para 10 has given sufficient reasons, wherein it has held that the subsequent suit is based upon separate cause of action. In the facts and circumstance of the present case, therefore, I find no jurisdictional error having been committed by the learned trial Court while rejecting the application as given in Para 10 of the said order. The writ petition as well as the stay application are accordingly dismissed. (Dalip Singh) J. ashok/ 3 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.710 of 2006. Smt. Ramavtari Devi & Another Versus Smt. Afroz Begum & Another