1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.08.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA Criminal Original Petition(MD) No.10302 of 2011 A.Alphonse Xavier .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District. 2.The Inspector of Police (crime) Kodaikanal Police Station, Dindigul District. .. Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondent No.2 to register F.I.R. on the basis of the complaint prepared by the petitioner dated 31.05.2011 for the alleged offences under Sections 420, 147, 341, 148, 448, 468, 506(ii) and 294(b) I.P.C. in accordance with law, consequently, directing the respondent No.2 to complete the investigation and file charge sheet before the Jurisdictional Magistrate within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner :Mr.Venkatesan For Respondents :Mr.K.V.Rajarajan, Govt.Advocate(Crl.Side) O R D E R The petitioner approaches this Court with a prayer to direct the respondent No.2 to register F.I.R. on the basis of the complaint preferred by the petitioner dated 31.05.2011 for the alleged offences under Sections 420, 147, 341, 148, 448, 468, 506(ii) and 294(b) I.P.C. and other offences in accordance with law, consequently, directing the respondent No.2 to complete the investigation and file charge sheet before the Jurisdictional Magistrate within the time stipulated by this Court. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has given a complaint on 31.05.2011 to the 1st respondent. But, so far, no action has been taken on his complaint. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly conceded that the petitioner has not followed the dictum laid down in the case in Sakiri Vasu vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409. 5. Since, the petitioner has not followed the dictum laid down in the case in Sakiri Vasu vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409, the petitioner is directed to avail the alternative remedy as per the dictum laid down in Sakiri Vasu vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409, before filing this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 6. With the above observation, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. SD/- Assistant Registrar (W) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(C.S) To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District. 2.The Inspector of Police (crime) Kodaikanal Police Station, Dindigul District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Arul Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10302 of 2011 09.08.2011 TR : 23.08.2011: 2p/4c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/