IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3462 of 2010 MD.NEJAD ALAM @ MD.NIJAM ALAM @ NIJAM ALAM @ MD.GUDDU SON OF MD. ALLAUDDIN, RESIDENT OF HAZI SUBHAN, POLICE STATION KOTWALI, DISTRICT MUNGER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 9.3.2010. Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in Kotwali P.S. Case No.309 of 2009 corresponding to Sessions Trial No.735 of 2009 for the offence under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code, 25(1-b)A, 26 of the Arms Act and 3/4 of Explosive Substance Act. In this case, it appears that trial has already commenced and two witnesses have been examined as per Annexures 3 & 3/1. Since trial is going on, it is not appropriate to extend the privilege of bail to this petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail is rejected. However, it is desirable to direct the trial court to expedite and conclude the trial within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If the trial is not concluded within six months from the date of - 2 - N.H./ receipt of a copy of this order, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. However, this direction will be subject to the cooperation being rendered by the defence during the trial. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)