1 Criminal Application No.5052/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5052 OF 2010 Madhav Rabhaji Kothimbire & ors. ... APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & anr. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri N.V. Gaware, Advocate for applicants Shri K.M. Suryawanshi, A.P.P. for respondents ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 13th January, 2011 PER COURT : 1. The applicant Nos.1 and 2 Madhav Rabhaji Kothimbire and Dattatraya Rabhaji Kothimbire apparently are beneficiaries of the relinquishment deed purportedly executed by the complainant. Consequently, their seeking bail in the event of arrest is not imperative. Custodial interrogation will unearth the real controversy and also illustrate procurement of the relevant papers at the behest and for the benefit of present accused/ applicant Nos.1 and 2. Consequently, their application is rejected. 2. So far applicant No.3 Chandabai Bapurao Borude, applicant No.4 Bhamabai Thakubhau Tamhane, applicant No.5 Rakhamabai Eknath Borude, applicant No.6 Mainabai Maruti Gholap and applicant No.7 Vatsalabai Sambhu Raykar are concerned, they are sisters and quite old in their ages, their custodial interrogation is not desired as prima facie it is difficult to conceive they had active role in 2 Criminal Application No.5052/2010 preparation of the so called false document. Hence order: O R D E R 3. In the event of arrest of accused/ applicant Nos.3 to 7, each one of them be released on furnishing P.R. bond and surety in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand). The applicant Nos.3 to 7 shall attend the concerned investigator whenever so specifically notified. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/cri5053.10