1 wp2203-10 vai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2203 OF 2010 Deokisam B. Sarda & Anr. ....Petitioners V/s. Jayprakash B. Joshi & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.P.B. Shah for the Petitioners. Mr.C.G. Gavnekar for Respondent. No.1 to 3. Mr.A.J. Dholkia i/b Mrs.N.A. Dholkia for Respondent No.4. Mr.A.I. Patel, A.G.P. for Respondent No.5. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 25TH JANUARY, 2011. P.C. :- 1. By consent, respondent No.4 is dropped from the proceedings. 2. The impugned order warrants no interference. It has merely permitted the application filed by respondent No.1 under section 73-A of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 to intervene in the proceedings under section 41-D of the said Act filed by respondent Nos.2 and 3. The application under section 41-D was filed for removal of the petitioners as the trustees. 3. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 had themselves disclosed their interest in the application under section 41-D inter-alia on the basis that they are residents of Nashik and were interest in having a planned and balanced development of the city of Nashik. The objects of the trust are 2 wp2203-10 wide enough, as they include any object of general public utility not involving carrying on any activity for profit. 4. Respondent No.1 cannot therefore, be said to be a person without any interest. Further, the Charity Commissioner has come to the conclusion that respondent No.1 would be in a position to produce evidence in support of the original application under section 41-D. It is difficult to set-aside this finding as perverse. 5. The writ petition is therefore, dismissed. The order is stayed for a period of four weeks from today.