7£T'^^w^, yaly'is, fstdiyy l^. N$>. Cc^ ^o.2D(fc/0 ^? «BI IS. 'ilWwill tlllcii^'fe^ <F3]<$1< ^sffiissn^r SB; HOWBLE SIffiI DHIBEJroRA MISBRA.J, PBTITIONER Satehin Satniami VERSUS RESPQNDENTS 1. State villag^ Jhanki, P.S. Abhanpur, Tahsu Ipistrict Raipur (CG) CU.1U. of Chhattisgarh, through Secret^ry, Ministry of Home, D.K.S. i, Raipur (CG-) 2. Super^ntendent ofPolice, Raipur (CG) 3. Deputl ;hedlul. /a. ^01-'A1(..-V^ 'l'nDes) 4. Policct Schediiled 'TTibes 5. Sarita Manovt occupq of Strcct 'ransu Bai, rfD/o late , aged about 41 Shri Latel !«: V Ccii ^ 13 /. yupenntenclent iled Castes and of Poiice Scheduled Raipur ('CG) Btation tnchargc, Castes and Raipur t'CG) Policc Station Scheduled Das w/< 1/s+a jtd.i-C' Msnohar ^al Das, aged about 40 years, ition -employee Oriental Bank Vlivekanand Aashram, Cotnmerce No. 6, Idganbliatha, Raipur, |and District Raipur (CG| 6. Brijeslji Soni, S/o V.K. Soni, aged about | 35 years, R/o in front of Deshb^ndhu School Kelkarpara, Raipu^, Tah. & Disttrict Raipur (CG) Sccmsjnchal s/o not known, R/o KeUsailpara, Raipur, Tahsil and 7. Distrid T-4-2008 l+ Oo^T-mr' fr*n\ [L AXfcUJJUJL IV-'VJTJ Shri S.K. Dadsena, Adfocate, for the petitioner. 9Tr?T^T P^t^ ^TT?^. rT5l- +'S/i 97—3/2008—40,000. !?^\. EK Ii ^- ?*!!>-.^ tl ^'^s'*. s ""~<ssS Is y j 'faarf^ .j" i?*. ^'"" -•'^1'' iiq-^j e^i i<^1i WiI3iI^B%qW ^^ '^V^fv^, ^Tti-y'lto, F°«niy'j,< (^3^1 ^aim ^fta ar^sr petitlioner Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dyj Grievance of the with the police on '27-7-'200^ on tne Dasis ot wmc&, cnme | with Section 34 of I.P.C. Castes and Scheduled 'Tribeife reg.stered. Looking to the petitioner also filed a comp^ F'irst Class, Raipur. After Magistrate called for the Superintendent of Police, Kaipiir airectmg nim to reasonable nme ana sutim.il the preltmmary enqutry was Leamed counsel for the dtrection by leamed file report under Section 17$ filed bv the petitioner has the report is filed. He furthe^ disposed of with liberty concemed Judicial Magistr^te ^l-'llcr^H ^*4^TT ^affim 3]i^i Govt. Advocate for the State. i§'fhat he lodged complaint against fhe respondents No. 5 to 7 |No. 8/2006 under Section 420 read Section 3(i)(x) of the Scheduled (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, was progress ui tiie complaint, the laint before the Judicial Ma&strate feistering fhe complaint, the leamed and sent a memo to fhe Dy. tusuchit Jati Kalyaa Police Station, the mvestigation wittun a his report and in the meaawhUe, Istayed ia fhe coniplaint case. petitioner submits that despite ;, fhe police has not cared to of Cr.P.C. and the complaint case j~eady been stayed for fhe period tiu. submits fhat this petition may be the petitioner to appToacti fhe F'irst Class for expediting the ana t^TClV registermg retport Ariusuchit cQmplete fhe Ma^strate, alt'eaay tib vwSpi 'Nw vwsv. rrawrH— FS/197—3/2008—40,000. TtTiir^ SII^t W 1<-< wn an^[ *i s«t ,1< fl- ^sf ^|A|]<it),. ®fl|yi<o,'fsicii'yy *ii*«nitK*(l<h sn^i TR^? ('^S5^1') wnw ^ifcf sn^( proceeduiR after cauing reporlt regarding progress of mvestig^.tion Accordinglv, fhe instanl to me petitioner to move Magistrate Flrst Class for e^ such application Oeing filed, airection to fhe concemed corupleting the investigation pollice <tii'!|!<'i<il-< lii*<<-fT 4 fs^S <l«it{i< ^TsiRnsii^r froni fhe concemed police station petition is disposed of with Uberty si|iitable appiication before Judidal •^pediting the complaint case. On Uie trial Court to issue suitable station to file final report after ^xpeamousJy. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge 4