IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.9933 of 2009 1. RAM BABU YADAV 2. Lal Babu Yadav @ Lal Babu @ Chandeshwar Yadav 3. Pramila Devi 4. Usha Devi 5. Eklauti Devi 6. Guriya Kumari 7. Pinki Kumari Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 15.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Counsel for the petitioners submits that allegations are false. Brother of petitioner nos. 1 and 2 was kidnapped and forcibly married to the deceased, she was never allowed to come and live in her matrimonial home. In connection with kidnapping and forcible marriage, police case was instituted as Ghoshi (Okari) P.S. Case No. 167 of 2002 in which trial is going on. However, evidence collected during investigation reveals that during the pendency of the trial, a Panchayati was held and the girl was brought to her matrimonial home, few days prior to the occurrence. In her matrimonial home she was strangulated to death. Evidence shows that petitioner no.2 had always been very active in opposing the marriage of deceased with his brother. He had earlier filed cases and always tried that the relationship in between the deceased and her husband should not be restored. Considering this, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner no.1 Ram Babu Yadav is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten - 2 - thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Ghoshi (Okari) P.S. Case No. 280 of 2008 (G.R. No. 2400 of 2008), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. So far as petitioner no.2 Lal Babu Yadav @ Lal Babu @ Chandeshwar Yadav is concerned, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Uday/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)