IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39672 of 2008 BAIJ NATH RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 18.12.2008 Heard Mr. Bishwajeet Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. The case is under section 304B of the Indian Penal Code and the petitioner is the father of the husband of the deceased. The allegation is that the deceased was married to accused Santosh Kumar in the year 2004 and she was killed by the accused persons because the husband, the elder brother and the present petitioner demanded a motor-cycle and a mobile phone from the informant. Reference has been made to para-12 of the case diary in which one witness has stated that the present petitioner Baij Nath Rai was residing in Patna on account of being separated from his son Santosh Kumar, the husband of the deceased. The further contention is that the motor-cycle could not be of any use of the petitioner who was residing in Patna and the husband was residing at the village. Let petitioner named above, under the above circumstances, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran, in connection with Nayagaon P.S. case no.3 of 2008. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )