1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3009 of 2009 (Sanjay Vs. The State) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.P.Chapalgaonkar, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. K.M.Suryawanshi, APP for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 15/9/2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard learned Counsel and learned A.P.P. 2. On 14.8.2009, there was alleged damage to a temple at village Chowka by some miscreants. Same was allegedly protested by a group of 50/60 persons who barged on the road and suddenly indulged in vandalism, starting pelting stones on the vehicles. The 14/15 Police Officers present could not control the mob of 50/60 persons. There was huge damage. The intervention of a political 2 leader to avert the incident did not play any positive role on the behaviour of the miscreants. The accused are named in the FIR, they were protected by interim order dt.31.8.2009. I find that the specific roles of pelting stones and damaging the property is indicated in the statements of Police Officers and the witnesses. 3. Though Counsel urged that names of other Police Officers are interpolated in the FIR, that by itself will not obviate the fact of FIR. It cannot be said that the custodial interrogation is not required in order to look forward for other miscreants, who were associates of the accused. In the situation, the request for pre-arrest bail is rejected. Interim protection vacated. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/3009-09crapl