IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9603 of 2008. Decided on: 14.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Dr. Prem Parkash Sharma. … Petitioner. Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Gautam, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Lokinder Paul Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.3. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): It is not in dispute that the present lis is covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in State of Himachal Pradesh versus Hari Ram Thakur and another, CWP No.132 of 2003, decided on 4th March, 2005. 2. Consequently, the present petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to release the attendant benefits including the interim relief, dearness allowance etc. to the petitioner in terms of notification of the Government of Himachal Pradesh, dated 8th January, 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - 1997, within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 14, 2010. (sck).