1 925010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9250 OF 2010 Surekha Bhausaheb Patil ...Petitioner V/s. Shri Sant Dnyaneshwar Vidya Prasarak Mandir & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Anilkumar Patil for the Petitioner Mr. C.R. Sonawane, A.G.P., for Respondents No. 3 to 5 CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND R.Y. GANOO, JJ. DATE: 19TH JULY, 2011 P.C.:- The relief claimed in this petition is to direct respondent No. 3 to decide and grant approval to the proposal dated 4th June, 2010 submitted by the Management in connection with the petitioner’s appointment as Assistant Teacher. The order of reinstatement in favour of the petitioner has been confirmed right up to the Supreme Court. In this backdrop, respondent No. 3 is obliged to decide the proposal concerning the petitioner, one way or the other, at the earliest. It is not 2 925010 necessary for us to inquire into the reason which prevented respondent No. 3 to decide the said proposal with promptitude. 2. We hope and trust that respondent No. 3 shall dispose of the said proposal dated 4th June, 2010 as expeditiously as possible, if already not disposed of, and in any case, not later than eight weeks from today. If the said proposal is pending decision, respondent No. 3 shall consider the grievance made by the petitioner in the present petition as final representation of the petitioner, and pass appropriate directions as may be warranted in the fact situation of the present case. 3. With these observations, this petition is disposed of, leaving all questions relating to grant or non-grant of approval to be decided on merits by respondent No. 3. R.Y. GANOO, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.