IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6545 of 2011 1. RAJKUMARI DEVI WIFE OF BHAGWAN SAH. 2. SRI BHAGWAN SAH SON OF BABU LAL SAH. 3. BABU LAL SAH SON OF LATE PASHPAT SAH. 4. UMESH SAH SON OF BABU LAL SAH. 5. DURGESH SAH SON OF BABU LAL SAH. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 28.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that after the marriage, the husband started demanding Rs. 50,000/- as dowry and prior to the occurrence the husband of the deceased had gone to Assam. It appears that informant was informed and about the occurrence then the informant went and found his daughter dead with the burnt injury. Considering the fact that there is a specific accusation against the husband and the occurrence took place after one year of the marriage, this court is not inclined to grant bail to petitioner no.5 which is husband. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the husband as it appears 2 from the First Information Report that the husband was not present when the occurrence took place. Since petitioner no. 1 to 4 are family members including the old grand father and there is no specific allegation against them.Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner nos. 1 to 4 above named, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 219/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Devendra/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)