IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 17 OF 2011 MRS. SHRADHA VINAYAK NAIK E COUTINHO ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA, THROUGH P.I. ANJUNA POLICE STATION, ... Respondent Mr. Valmiki Menezes, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. C. A. Ferreira, Public Prosecutor for the respondent. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 5th May, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. Menezes, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ferreira, learned Public Prosecutor for the respondent. 2. By order dated 25th November, 2010 passed by the Deputy Collector and Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mapusa under Section 18 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, the Deputy Collector has directed to hand over the keys of 'Rich Beauty Parlour' to the petitioner herein after obtaining necessary undertaking and subject to compliance of the rules and regulations for running the massage parlour. The petitioner is aggrieved by the following observations made in the impugned order : "It should be noted that men should give massage to men and female to female which is not been happening presently at the Rich Beauty Parlour." 3. According to Mr. Menezes, learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Deputy Collector has no jurisdiction to give such directions that men should give massage to men and female to female. 4. Mr. Ferreira, learned Public Prosecutor, upon instructions from the Deputy Collector, states that the respondent would not insist upon the compliance of above referred directions. The statement made on behalf of the respondent is accepted. 5. In view of the above, nothing survives in Writ Petition. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. 6. Needless to mention that I have not interfered with the rest of the order. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA