IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8038 of 2010 RAJESH PODDAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANOTHER ----------- For the Petitioner : M/s. Jagnnath Singh, P.K. Sinha and S.C. Giri, Advocates. For the State : Mr. Ram Chandra Sahni, A.P.P. ------------- 13. 9.2.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. No one appears on behalf of opposite party no.2. Earlier, this matter was heard on several occasions. On 23.6.2010, when husband and wife both were present in court in person, they had expressed their desire to live together and they were permitted to do so and matter was adjourned to 14th of July, 2010. The provisional bail granted to the petitioner was also extended. However, subsequently, a supplementary affidavit was filed on behalf of the petitioner that despite the order and expressing her desire to go with the petitioner, the wife did not accompany him rather he had gone to her sister’s place and is staying away. Thereafter, opposite party no.2 stopped appearing before this Court and her learned counsel also informed that 2 he has not received any instruction. In that view of the matter, notices were again issued to the opposite party no.2. Office has reported that notice under ordinary process has already been received by the opposite party no.2 personally and despite that none had appeared on her behalf today also. In the above view of the matter, the provisional bail earlier granted to the petitioner vide order dated 19.3.2010 is hereby made absolute. This application stands disposed of accordingly. P.S./Sanjay-II ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)