IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 11401 of 2004 Between: Kroviddi Visweswara Rao, S/o. Late SRKJBR Sarma, Qr. No. A2D, CISF Complex, HPCL, Malkapuram, Visakhapatnam - 530 011. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. Central Industrial Security Force, South Zone, Head Quarters, rep by its Deputy Inspector General, Rajaji Bhavan, Basanth Nagar, Chennai. 2. Central Industrial Security Force, HPCL Unit, reptd by Deputy Commandant, Malkapuram, Visakhapatnam - 11 3. Mr. Gain, father's name not know, aged not known, Deputy Commandant,CISF Unit, M/s Singareni Collaries Company Ltd. Ramagundam (AP) 4. Mr. B.B. Naik, father's name not known, aged now known, Asst. Sub Inspector, CISF Unit, M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Co., Visakhapatnam - 530 011. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order, Direction or a Writ one in the nature 'MANDAMUS' declaring (i) the proceedings No. E-38014(1)/1/E3/(SZ)/04/2735, dated 16/17-02-2004 of the 1st respondent (ii) the Proceedings Ref No. E-30014/Admn-I/Post/HPCL/2004/238, DT. 17-02-2004 of the respondent, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Transfer Policy No. E-30011/1/93-Estt.II, dt.08-11-1993 Under CISF CIRCULAR No. 34/94, of Directorate General, CISF, New Delhi and by SETTING ASIDE THE SAME to the extent of Petitioner herein consequently direct the respondents to continue the Petitioner before the 2nd respondent Transfer Policy No. E-30011/1/93-Estt.II, dt.08- 11-1993 Under CISF CIRCULAR No. 34/94, of Directorate General, CISF, New Delhi. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.SRINIVASA SARMA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST.SOLICITOR GEN.) The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard both sides. At their request, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for disposal. Since the Writ Petition is filed against the order of transfer and the petitioner has already been joined in the said post, the Writ Petition itself has become infructious. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. ____________ 21-03-2005 kvrm/hsd To 1. The Deputy Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Force, South Zone, Head Quarters, Bhavan, Basanth Nagar, Chennai. 2. The Deputy Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, HPCL Unit, Malkapuram, Visakhapatnam - 11 3. 2 CD copies.