SCA/3812/1988 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 3812 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= A R CHAUHAN & 11 - Petitioner(s) Versus DIST DEVELOPMENT OFFICER & 1 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : NOTICE UNSERVED for Petitioner(s) : 1 - 12. NOTICE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 1 - 2. ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE Date : 18/02/2008 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. The petitioners have moved this petition on the ground that they were selected on the post of Junior Clerk (Accounts Cadre) in the District SCA/3812/1988 2/2 JUDGMENT Panchayat at Mahesana but were not granted regular posting. They, therefore, moved the petition seeking quashment of the action of respondent in not giving regular posting to the petitioners, action of respondent in appointing persons from the common clerical cadre to the post of Clerk in accounts cadre and direction on the respondent to fill up all the vacancies in the accounts cadre only from the employees who have been selected for the accounts cadre. 1.1. It appears that upon the learned advocate for the petitioners being elevated as Judge of this Court, notices were issued to all the petitioners and have been returned unserved as they were not found at the address. 2. The record shows that the petitioners have chosen not to pursue this petition for a long time. In this set of circumstances, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. Interim relief, if any, granted earlier stands vacated. Liberty reserved to the petitioners to revive the petition in case of difficulty. ( A.L.DAVE, J ) srilatha