IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1758 of 2009 MAHADEO RAI & ANR . Versus MUKTESHWAR PRASAD & ORS . ----------- 6. 02/02/2011 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make some corrections in paragraph 9 of the petition in course of the day. Petitioner has filed this modification application for corrections some typing errors in the order dated 27.4.2009 passed in C.R.No.1662 of 2006. Upon issue of notice, the opposite parties have appeared through counsels and their names also appear in the cause list. However, none of them appears to oppose this modification application. The application is therefore allowed and the modification sought for in paragraph 9 of the application is treated to be allowed in the following manner :- In the seventh line of paragraph 3 of the order, in place of the word `pending’, it should be read as `decided on 13.11.1985’. In the ninth line of paragraph 3, the word `evidence’ should be read as `show cause’ In the eleventh line of paragraph 3 of 2 the order, in place of `sale deed’ it should be read as `deed of will’. Similarly, in the fourteenth line of paragraph 3 of the order, in the place of words `to take their stand in respect of the basis for claiming interest in the property as made by them in the written statement’, it should be read as `to produce the original registered deed of will filed in case no.1329(M) of 1985’. In the last line of this paragraph, the word `gift’ should be replaced by the word `will’. In the fifth line of last paragraph of the order, the words `miscellaneous proceeding’ should be replaced by words `144 Cr.P.C. Case No.1329(M) of 1985. In the last but one line of last paragraph of the order, in place of the words `records of the said proceeding’ it should be read as `registered deed of will from Registry Office, Sadar, Patna’. The order dated 27.4.2009 is modified to the extent indicated above. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)