1 SSK/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 126 OF 2010 Bhogilal Ratilal Shah ....Applicant Versus Hasmukhlal Chunilal ...Respondent Mr.Piyush Shah, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Hasmukhlal Chunilal, Respondent present in person. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 23rd JUNE, 2010. P.C.: The Applicant preferred R.A.D. Suit No.429 of 1987 in Small Causes Court for declaration that he is tenant in the suit property. The Respondent also filed L.E. & C Suit No.191/230 of 1989 in the Small Causes Court against the Applicant on the ground that he has been forcibly dispossessed by the Applicant and the status of the Applicant is that of the Gratutious Licencee. Both the suits were dismissed by the Judge of the Small Causes Court by his decree dated 15th January, 2004. 2 2. The Applicant preferred two Appeals being Appeal No. 375 of 2004 and 376 of 2004 before the Bench of the Small Court Court. Both the Appeals came to be dismissed by a common order dated 16th August, 2008. 3. The Applicant filed Civil Application No.14 of 2010 challenging the common order dated 16th September, 2008 arising out of judgment in R.A.D.Suit No.429 of 1987. After hearing the learned Counsel for the Applicant, the said Civil Revision Application came to be dismissed by an order dated 18th March, 2010. The Applicant, however, was granted time till 31st August, 2010 to vacate the suit premises subject to filing an usual undertaking. The Applicant has also filed the undertaking in the said revision affirming that he will vacate the said premises on or before 31st August, 2010. 4. In view of the order passed in the Civil Revision Application No. 14 of 2010, this Civil Revision Application will not survive and therefore, same is disposed of. (R. V. MORE, J.)