HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL (Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting.) (Chapter VIII Rule 32 (2)(b) Description of the case. W.P. S/S No. 305 / 2006 Chandi Prasad Bahuguna S/O Shri B.R. Bahuguna Vs State of Uttaranchal Secretary Health Department Government of Uttaranchal Approved for reporting. _____________________ Not approved for reporting Date of decision 7.3.2006 Initial of Judge IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 305 (SS) OF 2006 Chandi Prasad Bahuguna, S/o Shri B.R. Bahuguna, R/o New Suman Nagar, Dharampur, District-Dehradun. …………..Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Secretary Health Department, Government of Uttaranchal. 2. Additional Secretary, Chiktsa Siksha Uttaranchal. 3. Director Ayurvedic and Yunani Services, Uttaranchal. 4. Principal, Rishikul Ayurvedic College, Haridwar, Uttaranchal. ……….Respondents. Sri Atul Bahuguna, Advocate for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel for the State. Dated: 07.03.2006 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay the salary to the petitioner from 15.04.1993 to 01.07.1996 in compliance of the order dated 16.08.2005 which was passed after approval of committee. Further, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent of pay the salary to the petitioner from 15.04.1993 to 01.07.1996 along with interest @ 18% interest. The short submission of the petitioner is that on 18.05.2005, a direction was made for deciding the representation of the petitioner in terms of the order-dated 25.03.1998 within a period of six weeks. In pursuance of the said order on 16.08.2005, the said representation has been decided, where the Director has passed the order giving the benefit to the petitioner during period so suspension and also for payment of his salary. The grievance of the petitioner is that the order-dated 16.08.2005 has still not been complied with and has not seen light of the day. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the respondent no. 3 is directed to comply the order-dated 16.08.2005 within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) 07.03.2006 Rathor