IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No 4986 of 2008 RAM SANJEEVAN CHOUDHARY Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 5 26.09.2008 The petitioner states that he has no concern with Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Kumar Singh who is associated with M/s Trilok Swami & Company. He is neither in partnership with the said Pawan Kumar Singh in any business or in any firm but wrongly associating the petitioner with the said Pawan Kumar Singh @ Pawan Kumar, deductions have been made from his bills to satisfy liabilities against Pawan Kumar Singh @ Pawan Kumar as partner of M/s Trilok Swami & Company. In my view, such a matter cannot be decided in these proceedings. As in CWJC No 868 of 2008 disposed of today (Pawan Kumar -Versus- Union of India & Others), I have directed that the matter be examined by the Chief Engineer Electrical (Con), North East Frontier Railways. Let the petitioner may also make an appropriate representation to the said officer and the said officer would also decide whether petitioner can at all be made liable to pay the dues of M/s Trilok Swami & Company or of Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Kumar Singh. In case, it is found that deductions were wrongly made then he would ensure that the money is recredited/paid to petitioner forthwith. The decision would be taken within a period of three months. With these observations, this application is disposed of. M.E.H./ (Navaniti Prasad Singh)