^ IN THE HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISG^RH, JUDICATU^E AT BILASPUR .,< Wnt Petition No, ^^^ii ^ ^S^f ^' /2005 Gangotri Lim^Pvt. Ltd., ;j i^^.E<ye<At^-J''5angaRam Sharma, Late Shri Uday Narayan Sharma, Agedabout^^years, Resident of Lakhe School Complex, Near Gandhi Chowk, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Versus Respondents . State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Mines and Minerals, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur L Collector, Raipur / Mining Officer, Raipur. K' Mini / / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONStlTUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT. ORDEROR DIRECTION TODO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER Details ofthe petition. XI-HC-22 ^pfRl^flifsn' S^TTO <^A / '^ ^ < 3Fa?^Wn^iq'^ ^Tfl^<i<o, (qw^y 311^1 M5(<A N11HI tftNiW * "•'*•»-^ •••<•••^ 206 5^ SSwvA i^T^GTO^1 S-8-2005 Mrs Ramakant Mishra. courtsel for the petitioner. Mr. Yashwant Singh Thaku|r, Govt. Advocate for fte State/ respondente. Heard both the counsel. The petitioner has preferretl this writ petftion under Articte 226/227 ofthe Constitution of tndia, being aggri^ved by the inactlon on the part of respondent No.2 jn not giving permission to th|e petitioner to work on the leasemlnes. The case of the petitioner Land Revenue Code, ownership is that under Section 247 of the Chhattisgarh of ttie jand vests wjtti the State Governm@cdL_^- ; therefore, the petitioner applied f<^r mining lease of the area of 12.54 acres^@T- the land situated at Villase: Latp4r, Tehsil & District: Raipur, and mining lease was granted to the petitioner on \ cum-representation Annexure P permission, however, r^pondent ^iSite^W CTH^^N^ 3-12-1998, and deed Annexure P-1 was also executed. Thereafter, the petftton|er requestecl respondent No.2 to glve working permission. but the same was n4>t given. Lastty. the petitioner sent a notice- r3 to respondent No.2 for giving worldng [slo.2 has not responded thereto. Learned counsel for the p€|titionerprayed for a direction that respondent No,2 be directed to decide the rep|resentation and notice dated 11-7-2005 <rf the petitioner, to which tearnect Govt. ^dvocate has no objection. Having heard tearned couhset for the parties and having regard to the facts and drcumstances of the cajse. respondent No.2 is directed to decjde the representation-cum-notice dated in accordance with \aw.^i^ ^- With the direction aforesaidl 1-7-2005 of the petitioner on its own merite, ^ P-CA^C^- ^{{>ye> J^O^^Q ' flie petition stands disposed of. Consequently, IA.No.6701/|2005 also stands dispo^d of. Parties are entitled for certlf|ed copy ofthis order. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge