IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO.257 OF 1999 Tirth Chem Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner V/s. M/s.Subhash Silk Mills Ltd. ...Respondent ...... Mr.Dinesh P.Shah for Petitioner. Mr.Naushad Engineer with Mr.Mahesh Londhe i/b M/s.Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH 24, 2008. MARCH 24, 2008. MARCH 24, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Counsel for the Petitioner in all fairness accepts that the Petitioner should be permitted to withdraw this Petition with liberty to pursue similar or other proceedings and/or relief as may be permissible by law having regard to the exposition of the Division Bench in the case of N.L.Mehta Cinema Enterprises (P.) Ltd. v. N.L.Mehta Cinema Enterprises (P.) Ltd. v. N.L.Mehta Cinema Enterprises (P.) Ltd. v. Pravinchandra P.Mehta reported in 1991 (Vol.70) Pravinchandra P.Mehta reported in 1991 (Vol.70) Pravinchandra P.Mehta reported in 1991 (Vol.70) Company Case 31. Company Case 31. Company Case 31. This is on account of despatching : 2 : the statutory notice on the administrative office address of the Respondent Company instead of registered office which was due to sheer inadvertence. 2. Counsel for the Respondent has no objection for allowing the Petitioner to withdraw this Petition with liberty to pursue such remedy as may be permissible in accordance with law. 3. Accordingly, Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.