IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41343 of 2010 MD.RAJU @ RAJU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 22-11-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Md. Raju @ Raju has filed this application for anticipatory bail on the ground that he is not named in the FIR which is against one Aslam whose father’s name and address was yet to be ascertained as the occurrence had been taken place against passengers in a moving train. In the court below the anticipatory bail was filed by one Aslam @ Abdul Salim @ Raju whereas in this application the name of this petitioner is shown only as Md. Raju @ Raju. The court below has rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail holding that Aslam, the petitioner before the court below, was named in the FIR and was the main culprit. Now when the petitioner before this court is one Md. Raju @ Raju, it is difficult to decide this application on merits. If the petitioner, Md. Raju @ Raju is not an accused in the case then he has no apprehension of arrest and on that account, this 2 application for anticipatory bail is dismissed. BKS/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)