IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-9638 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 31, 2010 Kuljinder Kaur .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Rahul Rampal, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioner will be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., Senior Superintendent of Police, Batala, District Gurdaspur, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 3.3.2010, Annexure P6, already made to him by the petitioner. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2, i.e.,Senior Superintendent of Police, Batala, District Gurdaspur, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 3.3.2010, Annexure P6, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioner. 31.3.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge