In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh FAO No. 1480 of 1993 (O&M) Swaran Kaur alias Saran Kaur and another ... Appellants vs Waryam Singh and others .... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate. Mr. V. K. Garg, Advocate, for respondent no. 6. Rajesh Bindal J. Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate, who appeared for the appellants stated that the appellants in the present case has taken the brief from him in 2001 and he has no instructions to appear in the matter. A perusal of the paper-book shows that on 20.9.2001 when the matter was referred to the Lok Adalat, the following order was passed:- “As we find the learned M.A.C.T. appears to have decided the case on the basis of a settlement between the parties. There is no scope for further compromise. The matter shall go back to the High Court for its decision on merits.” In para 13 of the impugned award, the Tribunal has recorded that at the time of hearing it has been agreed between the counsel for the parties that the compensation may be settled at Rs. 84,000/-. Once the amount was determined on the basis of settlement between the parties, there was no question of filing any appeal against the impugned award. However, as no one is representing the appellants, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. 19.1.2010 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge