1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION P.I.L. NO. 63 OF 2008 P.I.L. NO. 63 OF 2008 P.I.L. NO. 63 OF 2008 Siddhivinayak Mitra Mandal, Nagadi, Pune. .. Petitioner. vs. The Director General Defence Estates & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. P.M. Gore for Petitioner. Mr. A.A. Deshpande i/by D.R. More for Respondent No. 5. Mr. P.I. Khemani, AGP., for Respondent No. 4. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & R.M. SAVANT, JJ. R.M. SAVANT, JJ. R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATE: 4TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATE: 4TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATE: 4TH FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C. . In substance this Public Interest Litigation is a private interest litigation as the main grievance is against the builder Respondent No. 6 and nothing prevents the persons who are suffering at the hands of the builder who has promised them 24 hours water supply and flouted the building constructions rules could approach the civil and criminal courts by invoking 2 various statutes which protects the rights of flat purchasers. On earlier occasion this court has already expressed an apprehension about the maintainability of such a petition and disposed of the earlier petition filed by the same petitioner i.e. Public Interest Litigation No. 15 of 2008 by its order dated 31.1.2008. Therefore, we are not inclined to entertain a Public Interest Litigation on the same subject matter again. The PIL is dismissed with liberty to approach the competent authority and take out appropriate legal proceedings against the concerned authorities and respondent no. 6 builder. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (R.M. Savant, J.) (R.M. Savant, J.) (R.M. Savant, J.)