IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14177 of 2009 BAMBAM SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 06/ 06.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is the husband apprehends arrest in a police case under Sections 498A and other provisions of the Penal Code and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. While counsel for the petitioner disputes the factum of marriage with the informant, learned counsel for the State from paragraph 27 of the case diary confirms the marriage of the petitioner with the informant, whereafter the petitioner is alleged to have remarried. This Court is not persuaded to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The application is rejected. However, if the petitioner appears before the court below and prays for regular bail, it shall be decided on its own merits in light of the guidelines laid down by this Court for grant of bail in matrimonial matters, without being prejudiced by the present order. DKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)