IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO.1350 OF 2009 Dt.20.11.2009 Between: Ch. Ranganna and others … Appellants And The District Collector, Mahaboobnagar District Mahaboobnagar, A.P. and another … Respondents Counsel for the Appellants: Sri T. Vishnu Teja for Mrs. S. Nanda Counsel for the Respondents: G.P. for Land Acquisition THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO.1350 OF 2009 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Anil R. Dave) The appellants are the original petitioners, whose lands have been acquired by the respondent authorities. It was the case of the petitioners before the learned Single Judge that after acquisition of the land in question and upon payment of compensation to the petitioners, the land in question has not been put to use by the government and therefore the government should have given the land back to the petitioners. It appears from the proceedings dt.3.3.2009 of the office of the Collector, Mahabubnagar District, that the land in question might be required by the Government in future. In the aforestated circumstances, the request of the appellants - petitioners for getting the land back had been rejected. After hearing the learned Advocates, the learned Single Judge came to the conclusion that after acquisition of the land in question and upon payment of compensation to the petitioners, the petitioners had no right over the land in question. The aforestated decision of the learned Single Judge dt.7.7.2009 in Writ Petition No.13550 of 2009 has been challenged in this appeal. We do not see any reason to entertain the appeal, as the order passed by the learned Single Judge is just and proper. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Appeal, W.A.M.P. No.2837 of 2009, filed by the appellants – petitioners for interim relief, is dismissed as infructuous. ______________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ ______________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 20.11.2009 bnr