1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4156 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4157 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 5869 OF 2010 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : P.R. BORKAR.J. DATED : 01.04.2010 1. Heard A.G.P. Shri S.N. Kendre for the applicants. This is an application for condonation of delay of 825 days in filing appeal against judgment and award passed by the Jt. Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad, in L.A.R. No. 425 of 1994. 2. It is stated in the application that after decision on 30.08.2007, A.G.P. made proposal to the Law and Judiciary Department for giving sanction to file appeal. Same was granted more than one year thereafter i.e. on 03.12.2007 the sanction was 2 received by the Office of Government Pleader, High Court, Aurangabad. It is not explained why almost 15-16 months were required for processing the proposal in the Law and Judiciary Department. It is further stated that thereafter appeal memo was ready in December, 2007. However, the authorities did not supply certified copies, difference chart and typed copies of judgment and award till July, 2009. Thereafter, on 02.03.2010 the appeal with delay condonation application is filed. 3. Absolutely, there is no explanation for delay as such. We find lethargy at every stage. For one year and six months typed copies and certified copies were not received by the A.G.P. for filing appeal and thereafter on receiving the same in July, 2009, there was delay of six months in filing the appeal. 4. Not being satisfied with the reasons given in the application, the application for condonation of delay is dismissed. 3 5. In view of dismissal of application for codonation of delay, the application for stay does not survive and it is disposed of as such. 6. Issue Court Fee refund certificate as per rules. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2010/APR10/ca4156.10