IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18418 of 2009 1. VINAY KUMAR DUBEY S/O SRI KALIKA PRASAD DUBEY R/O VILL.- FAIJALGANJ, P.S. SASARAM (T), DISTT.- ROHTAS AT SASARAM Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE ROHTAS 3. SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER ROHTAS 4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ROHTAS 5. OFFICER INCHARGE SASARAM POLICE STATION, SASARAM (T) ----------- 02. 14.02.2011 The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of the District Magistrate dated 12.12.2005, rejecting his prayer for an Arms license on the ground that he did not furnish the necessary information sought. The writ petition has been filed four years later on 23.12.2009. The orders stated that in compliance with the orders of the Court, the District Magistrate was in the process of expeditious disposal of the application and therefore framed a questionnaire for applicants to answer for expeditious consideration. The petitioner did not respond to the same. At this stage, the Court finds no error in calling for interference, if the District Magistrate requires any clarification, the applicant is required to furnish it. If the petitioner applies afresh in accordance with law, his application may be considered in accordance with the provisions of the Arms Act. The application stands disposed. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)