1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2122 OF 2009 Mohit Arvind Sharma .. Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2037 OF 2009 Shubham Satyakumar Mishra .. Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2240 OF 2009 Bharat Krishna Talkar .. Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondents. Mr.S.R.Ingale a/w Mr.V.V.Karnik in CA No.2122/09, Mr.Prakash Naik i/b M/s.Kiran Jain in CA No.2037/09 and Mr.Samir Vaidya in CA No.2240/09 for the applicants. Mrs.S.D.Shinde A.P.P. in CA Nos.2122/09 and 2037/09, Mr.K.V.Saste A.P.P. in CA No.2240/09 for the State. Coram: D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 29th June, 2009 P.C. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.P.P. 2 for the State. 2. The applicants in all the three applications are seeking bail in C.R.No.38 of 2009 of Lonavala City police Station. The crime has been registered against the applicants and others for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 302, 201, 404 r/w 34 of IPC. 3. Mr.Prakash Naik, learned counsel for the applicants, at the outset, submits that insofar as the applicants are concerned they did not participate in the commission of offence under section 302 of IPC. The only allegation against all the three applicants is that they used two credit cards of the deceased for purchasing articles from various shops. He submitted that, according to the prosecution, both the credit cards were given to the applicants by accused no.2, who actually participated in the commission of offence under section 302 of IPC. He, therefore, submits that insofar as the applicants are concerned, at the most the provisions of section 404 of IPC would be attracted. Learned A.P.P.’s appearing for the State in all the three matters have not disputed the submissions made by Mr.Prakash Naik, learned counsel for the applicant. In view thereof I am inclined to enlarge the applicants on bail. Hence the following order: Applicants in all the three applications to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each with one or two sureties to 3 make up the said amount, subject to the condition that the applicants shall report to the concerned police station on every alternate Saturday between 6 pm and 7 pm for a period of three months and thereafter on first Saturday of every month till conclusion of the trial. While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. Application is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)