( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3838 OF 2010 Digamber s/o Vithalrao Mete PETITIONER VERSUS Rajaram Sambhaji Mete and others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. S.V. Jadhav Patil, advocate for the petitioner. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 27th April, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. No interference is required in the process of execution of the decree. Learned counsel submits that identity of the land is changed due to the consolidation work. Liberty to file appropriate application before the executing Court under section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code. The status quo to be maintained for one (1) week. The petition is dismissed. ( 2 ) 3. The parties to act upon the copy of this order, duly authenticated by the Court Shirestedar. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/wp3838-2010