IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 9TH APRIL 2010 / 19TH CHAITHRA 1932 RP.No. 355 of 2010(J) ------------------------------ [AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.6604/2008 DATED 08/12/2009] .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ V.V. KUMARAN, AGED 60, S/O. VELAYUDHAN, VADIKITTY HOUSE, CHELUR, IRINJALAKUDA. BY ADVS. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR), SRI.RAVI .K. PARIYARATH. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN THE WRIT PETITION: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE TAHSILDAR, OFFICE OF THE THRISSUR TALUK OFFICE, THRISSUR. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, EDAKUNNI VILLAGE OFFICE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT., REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. SMITHA SUKUMAR. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/04/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P.355/2010 in W.P.(C).6604/2008-J = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 9th day of April, 2010. Order The judgment sought to be reviewed has been issued essentially without noticing the counter affidavit filed by the respondents in the writ petition. Under such circumstances, notwithstanding the grounds in the review petition, I am inclined to vacate the said judgment and list the writ petition for consideration on merits. This review petition is allowed and the judgment in WP(C).6604/2008 is vacated. The writ petition will be listed at 1.45 p.m. today for consideration. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/0904