IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.8998-C of 2009 & RSA NO.3014 OF 2009 DECIDED ON : 13.08.2009 Surjan Singh ...Appellant versus Charan Kaur & others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Onkar Singh, Advocate for the appellant. **** AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This appeal has been filed against the concurrent judgments of the Courts below dismissing the suit of the appellant claiming a declaration that the Kisan Vikas Patra of the value of Rs.1.5 lacs though purchased in the name of his wife actually belong to him. The following questions have been proposed: i) Whether the evidence brought on the record has been mis- appreciated as such the impugned judgments are vitiated and perverse? ii)Whether the evidence brought on the record been taken into consideration? iii)Whether the judgments have been passed on conjectures and surmises? iv)Whether the judgment and decree are illegal in view of the Benami Transactions (Prohibitions) Act, 1988? It could be seen that question No.(i) to (iii) are pure RSA No.3014 of 2009 -2- questions of fact. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to persuade me that the findings on these questions are either based on no evidence or on such mis-reading of evidence so as to render them perverse. In view of question No.(i) to (iii), question No.(iv) does not arise. Consequently, this appeal and stay application are dismissed. August 13, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE