IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7032 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE C.K.THAKKAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- NATVARLAL S SANGHAVI Versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF CITY OF AHMEDABAD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR RM VIN for Petitioner MR BP TANNA for Respondent No. 1, 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE C.K.THAKKAR Date of decision: 11/02/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT In the light of the circumstances, at the time of admission, interim relief was granted in the petition. No doubt, Mr. Vin, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that various law points have been raised and other petitions are pending. 2. In the facts and circumstances, in my opinion, the relief which was required to be granted had been granted at the time of admission and no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending. Accordingly, the petition deserves to be disposed of by discharging rule. I may, however, state that since I am not entering into the merits of the matter, questions of law which are raised in the present petition and in respect of which other petitions are pending will be decided on their own merits and disposal of this petition will not a bar in raising those questions in other petitionrs. The petition is accordingly disposed of. Rule discharged. Interim relief vacated. No order as to costs. 11-2-2000 (C.K.Thakkar, J.) *mithabhai