IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15509 of 2011 RAM PRAVESH BAITHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 26.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report and his name transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused Gauri Shanakar Jha @ Dinkar Jee as it would appear from perusal of the impugned order of the learned court below. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that co –accused Gauri Shankar Jha @ Dinkar Jee has already been granted privilege of bail by another bench of this court vide order dated 20.7.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 14998/2010. It is further contended by him that so far as criminal antecedent of the petitioner is concerned, petitioner has been remanded in almost all the cases which have been registered against unknown persons. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Ram Pravesh Baitha, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Add. Sessions Judge FTC VI, Sitamarhi in Sessions Trial no.491/2009 arising out of Bairgainiya P.S. Case no.64/2005 subject to the condition that one of the sureties must be close relative of the petitioner. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J))