IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13053 of 2010 INDRADEO SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.44652 of 2009 1. RANJU DEVI W/O INDRA DEO SAH 2. RANJU DEVI W/O PRAMOD SAH ---------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 17.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that marriage is of the year 2003. The deceased was suffering from some ailment, was being provided medical aid by local doctor and was referred to P.M.C.H. but on way she died. As against it, there is clear allegation about demand of dowry, torture for its non-fulfilment and unnatural death though only one witness is examined to state that all the accused persons were living separate and parents were residing with their another son but there is no corroboration that the deceased was under treatment of any doctor. Parents if were residing with another son, have come in the statement recorded after near about three months. Dowry demanded by Gotni may be doubted. Thus, having regard to the facts and 2 circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner namely Indradeo Sah (Cr.Misc.No. 13053 of 2010) and petitioner no.1 namely Ranju Devi wife of Indra Deo Sah (Cr.Misc.No. 44652 of 2009) is rejected. Prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner no.2 Ranju Devi wife of Pramod Sah (Cr.Misc.No. 44652 of 2009) is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner no.2 namely Ranju Devi wife of Pramod Sah (Cr.Misc.No. 44652 of 2009) shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 214 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)