CRLR No. 97 of 2011 with CRMA No. 498 of 2011 Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Shri Siddhartha Sah, Advocate, present for the revisionist. Shri M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, present for the State. Heard. This revision is directed against the order dated 17.02.2011, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Roorkee, in criminal appeal no. 48 of 2006, whereby said court has allowed the appeal, and acquitted the respondents Om Tyagi, Vivek Tyagi, Vikas Tyagi, Nasar, and Azhar from the charge of offences punishable under section 147, and 506 IPC. Perusal of the impugned order passed by the appellate court shows that the said court has acquitted the accused after reappreciating the evidence on record holding that the charge of offences punishable under section 147, and 506 IPC are not proved beyond reasonable doubt. The finding recorded by the appellate court cannot be said to be perverse or against the evidence on record. Considering the nature of offence, and reasons mentioned by the lower appellate court, this Court is not inclined to interfere in its revisional jurisdiction with the impugned order. Therefore, the revision is dismissed summarily. (Prafulla C. Pant,J.) Parul 19.05.2011