:.;.-:'~sff'~:SK^ss'ssfr'ets'sK' ^'/7/^ W THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISQARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO?-"^'' / 2005, Petitionet Radhelal Mahipal, S/o Late Itwari Mahipal, Aged about 39 years, Occupation - Police Constable, R/o New Police Line, BIock E, Qr.No.63, Durg, Dist: Durg-(C.G.) Vwsus Respondeats / / ^ ..^ •'\ 6 /^. /!\C"/M ^~l^/wsy ^ /(^/^y ^^2/' w'/^fy / ..Y->^ />7W /-A'V 7 .-'' ^iy/v //y V7 3; 4. 5; State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Dept. ofHome, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Dist: Raipur - (C.G.) The Director General of Police, Chhattisgarh, Police Headquarter, Raipur, Dist: Raipur - (C.G.) The Asst.Inspector General of Police, (Selection), Police Headquarter, Raipur, Dist:Raipur-(C.G.) The Sr.Supdt. ofPolice, Dist : Durg-fC.G.) The Supdt. Of Police, Dantewada, Dist: Dantewada - (C.G.) WRIT PETITIOILUNBER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION "i^ ,-' & OF INDI& XI-HC-22 3^' '<<l<llciq, ®Tfl+1'IS,fsjdl+iy 34J^!j>l 4s(*~, ^.y-'-i-s^si -L.W.S- iit<CTi sn*<ith ••••••••••••••••••••• ^pj- 2fl(( Rife4 3-n^r^ i^ri^an^T aiiiwgfgtT ^ 3I1^T?HfTWTrf?cT 8.7.2005 Hortie Petitioner by Shri Respondents/ Stete Lawyer. Heard. The petitioner has of the Constitution of 10.6.2005 whereby on petitioner back to fhe Department, he has been fi^om. Dui^. Leamed couusel fol petitioner was appouited 4! he was transferred froni the State of Chhattisgarb|, District PoUce Force Dui^ deputation to fhe 25.4.2003. On repatriati^: petitioner had joiaed at unpugned dated 10.6.200i to the District Force Dantewada. Leamed counsel forl fhe petitiouer challenges Vifaod Deshmukh^ Advocate. }iy Shri Panlcaj Shrivastava, Panel dled lAdja fhis petition uxider Ardcle 226 chaBenging the order dated r^patriation of the sendces of the Departnient fix>in the Transport (^irected to be posted at Dantewada Traas^ort °hl<<Ic1''fl-l Hlldl fftet^<Rl«l< ^srf^irsn^T fhe petitioner submits that the ^s Constable aad in the year 1993 |abalpur to Dui^. Afler creation of |;he became fhe constable of fhe and fioin Durg he was sent on Department with eflFect j6x)m to the Home Departinent the |Raipur fioia where by fhe order (Aauexure P/1) he has been sent the naxaUte afFected district An Bl the petitioner further submits fhat his traasfer to Dantewada i.e. (iN>^^) I'!l XI-HC-22 3n^T^iT f^TRisn^r aiiif^gf?(T •It-."Jll^ 'v,/1 -^ y<K t f - ,.t?'\ 3^ -fWIW^, BTfl'H'IS, (sidl^y sn^ @ u5'C. 2-3^ /1-^-S WflCTTaiHK*! f^s aii^igwiwofer - T. bedause naxalite affected area constable caa not be In view of the petition can be disposed| to inake a representaticm| ^ period of 15 days {roin. on such representation aufhority concemed traasfer of the petitione^ poUcy frauned in this re; fi?oin fhe date of subi petitioner. However, fhe not be given eflfect to tffl aufhority concemed. Ordjc In view of the forej of fmnlly. Consequently, 3840/2005 stand dispos^-d tradsferred ab<|)ve shdU lonef •-S imiti +i<itc<41-f ^i^cTl'fffe'^l <f»i«i< ^3T1^IT3[)^T as per the poUcy offhe Govt. a out of fhe district. i|)ve, I am of fhe opiruon that this |ofwifh the liberty to the petitioner |to fhe aufhority concemed wifhia a |oday raising all bia grievances and being filed by the petitioner, fhe consider aad decide the case of in accoidance wifh law and the ^ard, within a period of one ruonth ision of the representation by the brder of transfer to Dantewada wiU pie representation is decided by fhe ired accordingfy. ^oing, tl}is petition stands disposed Mf)V)P No. 2484/2005 and I.A.No. of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge (•fl^^N-)