1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP Nos. 9723 of 2011-C & 9733 of 2011-D. Decided on: 16.11.2011 1. CWP No. 9723 of 2011-C Santosh Versus State of H.P. & anr. 2. CWP No. 9733 of 2011-D Parveen Kumar Versus State of H.P. & anr. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner(s) : M/s S.C. Sharma and Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocates for the respective petitioners. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is a para teacher. He is aggrieved since he is not paid the vacation salary and other benefits as are paid to the contract teachers. In the judgment dated 21.10.2010, in CWP No. 2880 of 2010 titled as Dhananjay Saini versus State of H.P. & ors., and connected cases, this Court has held that para teachers are entitled to all the 2 emoluments as are paid to contract teachers, because as per the Government policy, they are to be treated similarly for all purposes. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to pay the eligible vacation salary during the entire service period to the petitioners, in case the same has not been granted so far in view of the judgment of this Court in Baldev Singh versus State of H.P. & ors, on production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition and copy of the judgment, referred to above. If the amounts are not disbursed as above, the petitioners will be entitled to interest @ 10% and the officers responsible for the delay shall be personally liable for the same. 2. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. November 16, 2011 (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (sck/hl) Judge.