^~" R • "f^'iF'TiI.I''.nTRTTF'li'SHBT SATI8U y Sifi^'i'HOTJt'S ^-Ss, I, AS.'^Ji'-'-i ^J-S^t^.\' ^ iU >3 ^ l.'^&.J O^.XA'SS.A '^.n.s. ±',.JS.^. a.'^-B r-s.'^3'i''-.iX-3-'^J? ^ ^ WRIT PETITION (0 No. of2007 "fy^''~ -£. -ii^-- p' T) 17 ','»JTtTi"V MESFUNniS^.'1'S ¥- ^IT T'T' .A M PT? ATV 'hAJ.f^ ;% A TJA i^ Ai?' .'~t C.' A^-^i^ 1T iXriL 1 ia.^'JL±\^ ^A-a.i.A^^-^-^r-AAV. AR J.P. Naear. Camn-2. Dt. Durs Through: Its Presidem, Dasaralh Yadav, S/o Shri. Shvam Sundar Yadav. Aged about 45 years, Resident of ; J.P. Nagar, Camp-2, BHILAI District: Durs (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS I. State of CMiattisgarh Through: The Secretar", Department of Civil Suppliss, D.K.S. Bhawan. Mantralava RAIPUR. •B^'lll^C'. Revenue Sub-Division. DURG. .onircuer. Collsctor fFood'). DUSG OfTice Oi Vi. Ul^ <t, 4. Prathamic Upbhokta Kumhar Para. Wam No. 23. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^r-- iL3^j4_/ANCE OF WR: 'HE NATURE OF MAimAMUS. CERTIORARI ETC. Present: Mr, B.P.Rao. Adi.'ocate fbrthe petitioner. Miss Deepali Paiidev- Paael Lawyer fer tlie State / respondent No. 1 to 3. Oi?nRR 'ji.^.a.^^'^ji.' (Passed on 19"' dav ofAoriL 2007) Learned counsel aoDearine fer ths netitioner submits that the netitioner cloes not want to riress other nomts sxceot ttiat tiis —.—...—.-.-3—...._.. representaiion dated 27.03.2007 (Aanexurs P/3) pending before the Food Controller, Offlce of the Collector (Food), Durg, be decided within a stipulated time ia accordaiice with law on its own merit, to wiiich the leamed counsel appearing for the State / resoondents tias no obwction. It is oraered accordineiv. 3. The respondent no. 3 is directed to decide the pending representation oi: tne petitioner on its own ment, wrtfim a penod 01 fbiir weeks froEi the date ofreceiDt ofa coriv ofthis ordsr la view of the above, the petitioii stEmds disoosed of No order as t-n p.r'i's'4'1^ i-'^.f •^t\^0--S. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Asdt \,.'