IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33708 of 2010 UMA NATH THAKUR S/O LATE RAMPHAL THAKUR…PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.11.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that rice or wheat meant for mid-day meal if was not distributed or lifted is the responsibility of co-accused Anita Devi the Contractor under the direction of superior official. F.I.R. is lodged by this petitioner against Anita Devi. Petitioner has been shown responsible for not properly supervising distribution of the wheat or rice among beneficiaries. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with warisnagar Police Station Case No.49 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.