THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 621 OF 2011 ORDER: 1. This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed aggrieved by the order dated 20.11.2010 in I.A. No.183 of 2010 in O.S. No.31 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Parchur, Prakasam district. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The petitioners/plaintiffs filed the interlocutory application under Order I Rule 10 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’) to implead the respondents 5 to 7/third parties as defendants 5 to 7 respectively in the suit, which was dismissed by the trial court. 4. The primary object of enacting Order I Rule 10 CPC is to bring before the Court, at one and the same time, all the persons interested in the dispute so that all the controversies in the suit may be finally determined once for all in the presence of all the parties without delay, inconvenience and expenses of several actions, trials and inconclusive adjudication. But, the party who wants to invoke aid of the said provision, must show some semblance of right over the property in dispute. Further more, an effective decree cannot be passed in the absence of the parties, whose rights are severely and seriously affected. 5. In the case on hand, the suit is filed for partition of the plaint schedule properties. In a suit for partition, a preliminary decree has to be passed determining the rights of the parties who are entitled to share in the joint family properties. Rights of the third parties cannot be determined in the preliminary decree. Their remedy is otherwise. The respondents 5 to 7/proposed parties are alleged to have purchased some of the joint family properties. So, their rights cannot be decided in the preliminary decree that may be passed in the suit. However, they can claim equity at appropriate stage by filing an application. Therefore, the trial court rightly dismissed the petition and there are no grounds to interfere with the impugned order. 6. The Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merit and is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. However, the petitioners are given liberty to implead the subsequent purchasers of joint family properties in final decree proceedings. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 01.04.2011 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 621 OF 2011 01.04.2011 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 621 OF 2011 01.04.2011 Between: Kalva Surendra Babu & another …Petitioners And Kalva Sundaramma & others …Respondents