IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.474 of 2010 1. SAROJ PATEL W/O SRI JAGDISH KUMAR R/O MOHALLA- CIVIL LINE (WARD NO. 19), P.S.- BUXAR IN THE DISTT./TOWN OF BUXAR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SCHEME, DEPTT. OF SOCIAL WELFARE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE - CUM - COLLECTOR BUXAR 4. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER BUXAR 5. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER BUXAR 6. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER BUXAR BLOCK IN THE DISTRICT/TOWN OF BUXAR with CWJC No.642 of 2010 1. RENU DEVI W/O SANTOSH KUMAR THAKUR R/O WARD NO. 14/21, TURHA TOLI, P.S.- BUXAR IN THE DISTRICT/TOWN OF BUXAR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPTT. OF SOCIAL WELFARE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR, INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SCHEME, DEPTT. OF SOCIAL WELFARE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE CUM COLLECTOR, BUXAR 4. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER, BUXAR 5. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, BUXAR 6. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, BUXAR BLOCK IN THE DISTRICT/TOWN OF BUXAR with CWJC No.1386 of 2010 1. MADHURI DEVI W/O LATE SUNIL KUMAR SINHA R/O MOHALLA- BARI TOLA, WARD NO. 17, P.S.- BUXAR IN THE DISTRICT/TOWN OF BUXAR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR, INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SCHEME DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE - CUM - COLLECTOR BUXAR 4. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER BUXAR 5. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER BUXAR 6. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER BUXAR BLOCK IN THE DISTRICT/TOWN OF BUXAR ----------- 2. 08.03.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the State. Learned Counsel submits that the petitioners desire to file a representation before the Director, I.C.D.S. against the order terminating their services as Anganwari Sevika. Learned Counsel for the State objects that the termination is of the year 2007 and the writ petition has been filed in 2010. If the petitioners file such representation within a period of 30 days from today let the same be disposed by a reasoned and speaking order by respondent no. 2 within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into merits which shall remain open for consideration by the concerned respondent on facts and in law. The writ applications are disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)