IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 1060/2008 Decided on:15.3. 2010 _____________________________________________ Sunny Sharma. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. no. For the petitioner : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral) Petitioner’s mother died on 30.12.1999. Petitioner was informed vide Annexure A-8 dated 11.8.2000 that his case for compassionate appointment shall be considered after attaining the age of majority. Petitioner was called upon by the employer to supply certain certificates. It has come in the reply that respondents have not refused employment to petitioner on compassionate grounds at any stage. Respondents have mentioned that nine certificates are required as per Annexure R-1. Annexure R-1 is not on record. However, in the interest of justice respondent-State is directed to inform petitioner about the nature of 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? . No. 2 certificates required to be furnished by him by way of specific letter. Thereafter the case of petitioner shall be considered immediately after the receipt of certificates for compassionate appointment. Accordingly, in view of above observation/direction, the petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 15.3. 2010 *awasthi*