1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.646 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3862 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.647 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3865 OF 2009 Pritish Nandy Communications Ltd. ...Applicant. v/s. Inder Kapoor and Anr. ...Respondents. Ms Dimple Shah ,adv. for the Applicant. Ms Purnima G. Bhatia, adv. For the Respondent No.1. Mr. Y.M.Nakhawa, APP for the R.No.2/State. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : AUGUST 25 , 2011. P.C. 1 These two applications are filed for restoration of criminal application nos.3862/2009 and 3865/2009, which were filed by the applicant seeking leave to prefer appeal against acquittal in the cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 2 Said two applications were dismissed for want of prosecution on 6th December, 2010 by the common order. The order shows that the parties had informed the Court earlier that they had amicably settled the dispute out of the Court and the respondents were 2 also making payments in instalments. Some instalments were paid from time to time. On 6th July, 2010 , parties had sought adjournment for two weeks to file consent terms. Thereafter, neither parties filed Consent Terms nor any further steps were taken. In view of this, Court disposed off applications for want of prosecution. It is material to note that on 6th December, 2010 , none was present for the applicant to tell the Court that the matter was not settled. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances noted above, I see no reason or justification to restore said applications. 3 In the result, both the applications stand dismissed. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)