1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4410 OF 2009 1. Shahira @ Sairabano Moula Mulani 2. Sakina Babasaheb Mulani ....Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent ----- Shri Rahul S. Kate for Applicants Shri H.T. Dedhia- APP for State ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 18TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant and the learned APP for State. 2. The Applicants are two elderly women,who apprehend arrest in connection with an offence registered vide C.R. No. 2202 of 2009, punishable under sections 395, 307, 333, 332, 353, 323, 506 of the Indian Penal code. And under section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. 3. It is submitted that one of the co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail by the Sessions Court in Criminal Application No. 1227 of 2009. When the learned APP for the State asked whether the custody of the Applicants is required. He, after taking 1 instructions from the Investigating Officer, submitted that they do not require the custody of the present Applicants. 4. The Applicants, under these circumstances, in the event of their arrest in connection with offence registered against them, be released on bail in a sum of Rs.5,000/- with one or two sureties each in the like amount. They shall report to the concerned police station as and when called. 5. Application is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE J.)