•^%.s-^^^al^! r fpi^e^H ^^ (^ 2_ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.2-37 PETITIQNER < .^J ^.w ^5/^' ^ t^.;>" -. A '^ \^ \ ^' \^i'' <^^.- RESPONDENTS ^' -^" DayaramVerma, S/o Shri S. R.Verma, Age about 43 years, Lecturer (Chemistry), R/o Pramakunj, Shanti Vihar, Sai Mandir, Gol Chowk, Dagniya, Raipur, Distt.- Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS State Govt of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) c.\ ^" "^ .^^' DirectorofPubliclnstruction ^ Q <^! Raipur(C.G.) 3. District Education Officer Durg(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTLOhL QF iNDJA ^. HI&H COURT OFCHHATTtSGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. WRFT PETmON CS.) No.29? OF 2007 Petitioner : Shanker lal Soni versus Respondents State of Chhattisgctrh and otiiers Petitioner WRIT PETTTtON (S.V No.293 OF 2007 Yad Ram Patel versus Kespondents State of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner WRFT PETmON 15.) No.296 OF 2007 Smt. Vimla bevi Bhagat versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others And Petitioner WRTT PETTTtON (S.) No.297 OF 2007 Dayaram Verma versus Respondents State Sovt. of Chhattisgarh and others Present ; Mr. Anil Mourya, Mr. Sanjay Patel, and Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner(s). Mr. Sushil Dubey, (Sovernment Advocate. Mr. Arvind Oubey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. OR DER (Passed on this 19rt Day of January, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar BharadwaJ vs. Municipal Cwporation, Dury and armthei^. 2. For the aforementioned recsons, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar BharadwaJ (Supra), subject to verificcttion of the fact os to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed. Certificates at thsir own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on the record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge 1 2006 CD:) MPJR-C6 96 Thakur