ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2150 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 2150 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 2150 OF 2007 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 152 OF APPEAL NO. 152 OF APPEAL NO. 152 OF 2005 2005 2005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.Uday P. Warunjikar for the applicant. Ms. A.R.S.Baxi for the respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 6th August, 2007 : 6th August, 2007 : 6th August, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Considering the averments made in para 3 to 9, a sufficient cause is made out by the applicant to set aside and quash the order dated 02/03/2006. The fact that as contended by the learned counsel appearing for the applicant that it was respondent No.8 who was also using illegally electricity for ganja crops, the presence of respondent No.8 in ( 2 ) the matter is necessary. 2. Though served, as averred in this application, none appeared for respondent No.8. 3. In the result, the present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), (b) and (c). Civil application is disposed of, accordingly. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]