HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L. NAGESWARA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOs.3609, 3610, 3611, 3692, 3693, 3694, 3695 and 3696 of 2006 COMMON ORDER: All the Civil Revision Petitions arise out of the proceedings of execution in O.P.No.88 of 1985 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Eluru. 2. The land belonging to the decree holders/claimants was acquired for the benefit of the present revision petitioners and the Court has granted enhancement of compensation. The revision petitioner herein is shown as the second judgment debtor in all the Execution Petitions and also the party in the Original Petition No.88 of 1985. 3. The revision petitioner has contested, that the said proceedings being for beneficiary, and who has to ultimately pay the money to the Government for discharge of the decretal liability. According to the revision petitioner though it is shown as a party to the Execution Petition but shown as not a necessary party and therefore, no notice was served and after hearing the Government Pleader the calculations were made and orders were passed for payment of the money. According to the claim of the revision petitioner the calculations made by the decree holder are not proper and could not be effectively represented on behalf of the Land Acquisition Officer and as the revision petitioner who has to pay the money ultimately to the Government the opportunity should be given to the revision petitioner to show the extent of liability under the decree. 4. The contention of the revision petitioner appears to be tenable and behind the back of the revision petitioner any determination of the liability payable by the revision petitioner will cause hardship to it and therefore, the lower Court is directed to clear the objections of the revision petitioner and pass such orders which are according to law. 5. Accordingly, all the Civil Revision Petitions are allowed and the revision petitioner is directed to file objections, if any, about the calculations made by the decree holder or arrived at by the lower Court within a period of one month and thereafter the lower Court should dispose of the Execution Petitions within a period of two months. Accordingly, the orders of the lower Court are set aside and the matter is remanded to the lower Court. Each party should bear their own costs. ___________________________________ JUSTICE N.R.L. NAGESWARA RAO June 29, 2011 Pn HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L. NAGESWARA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.3609, 3610, 3611, 3692, 3693, 3694, 3695 and 3696 of 2006 June 29, 2011 Pn