IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4527 of 2010 Between: Chirumamilla Nageswara Rao ..... PETITIONER(S) AND Chirumamilla Padmavathi .....RESPONDENT(S) HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4527 of 2010 ORDER: Petitioner, who is the judgment debtor, filed this revision under Section 115 CPC inter alia seeking to assail correctness of the order passed in an execution application rejecting the objection taken by him. Heard. Perused the material available on record. It is seen that when the respondent-decree holder filed an application under Order XXI Rule 22 and Section 35 of CPC with a prayer to issue notice to the petitioner-judgment debtor and deliver possession of the petition schedule property to her, the petitioner raised objection that as the final decree has not yet been passed and the inquiry for mesne profits is still pending, the property cannot be delivered. But the Court below declined to sustain the said objection on the ground that the final decree was passed and there is no appeal against the said final decree. Admittedly, in the absence of any appeal on the final decree, it is not open for the petitioner to raise all such objections. Therefore, I see no ground in the impugned order warranting interference by this Court. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J 1st October, 2010 CVRK