.HIGH COURT OF CHRAT’I‘igGARH AT EILA$PUR 1v, wings; mo. 2mg2008 I PETITIONER Nixmaia Paikam’ Aged 52 years, Asstt. Teacher, W/ o. Shri M.S.Paikara, Rio. Gaousaia Para, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh {CG} Versus RE$PON3ENTS l. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretaxy, Education Department, DKS Bhawan, Disil. Raipur (CG) 2. Principal, Govt. Girls Higher Secondaly School, Rajgarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) Distn‘ct Education Officer, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 225 013' THE CONSTITUTION Q? mmé jSB: Hon’bie Mr. Satish K. &ihotri. 3.! g‘iui R.R.Sinha, oounsel for the petitioner. Shn‘ Arvinci Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the Staie. OW GREER (Passed on this 11m day of January 2008) l. Lealned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact and question of law involved in the present writ pen‘tion are the same to that of in X’ashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg an§ another {2006 (Ii), MEIR—CG 96}, which has been diSposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvelt the said submission. / 2. Accordingly, the Wn‘t petition 1’s ailowed in terms of the order s passed in the case ofYashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipai Goryoration, Burg and another (Supra), subject to Veriiication of the fact-as to Whether the petitioner has acquired B. Ed.,IB.T.1 /' \ \\ Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24. 12. 1998 and 01.03. 1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No ozder as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur ‘l l i J l ‘1 ‘r V