1 S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.2358/2007 Smt. Sudha Ramdeo. vs. District Judge, Jodhpur and another. Date : 29.10.2007 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.AK Acharya, for the appellant. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the appellant. The appellant is aggrieved against the order dated 7.8.2007 passed by the District Judge, Jodhpur. The order dated 7.8.2007 is only to the effect that the appellant shall pay court fees as per the Rules. How the appellant is aggrieved when the court says that the court fees is to be paid as per the law only ? Even if the appellant has paid the requisite court fees, then she could have moved an application stating therein that according to law, she has already paid the court fees. 2 Nothing has been brought on record by which it can be said that the order of the trial court directing the appellant to pay court fees as per law, is illegal. Appropriate remedy is to approach the court below by moving application. With the aforesaid observations, this misc. appeal is disposed of. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya