1 Kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1121/2009 Megha Sagar Juglani. ....Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra and others. ....Respondents ............. Ms.Snehal V. Khairnar with Ms.Saloni Sathe, Advocates for the Petitioner. Ms.S.V.Gajre, APP for the State. Mr.Chetan Agarwal, Advocate for the Respondents Nos.2 to 5. ............. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. Dated :- 08th May, 2009 PC :- 1 Rule. 2 The learned APP waives service. The Advocate for the Respondents Nos.2, 3, 4 and 5 waives service. 3 The Petitioner is the first informant who lodged the First Information Report alleging commission of the offences under Sections 498-A, 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accused are the second to the fifth Respondents’. The Petitioner is wife of the second Respondent. 4 After the First Information Report was lodged, the Petitioner and the second Respondent filed a petition under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for divorce by mutual consent. The consent terms were filed by the Petitioner and the second Respondent before the Family Court under which the Petitioner agreed to apply for quashing the proceedings. 5 The First Information Report is the outcome of the matrimonial dispute between the Petitioner and the second Respondent. Now, there is a complete settlement between the parties in the matrimonial dispute. Therefore, continuation of the criminal 2 proceedings will cause undue harassment to the parties. Hence, this is a fit case for exercising the power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 6 Hence, I pass the following order:- Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). JUDGE