IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 7424 of 2010 Date of Decision: 27.4.2010. Ram Phal --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. P.L. Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.S. Kundu, Addl. A.G., Haryana has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents-State. The petitioner was conveyed adverse A.C.Rs vide communication dated 7.9.2007 (Annexure P-1). He filed a representation which has been rejected vide communication dated 13.5.2009 (Annexure P- 3) and another such representation vide communication dated 20.8.2009 (Annexure P-4). These two communications are under challenge in the present writ petition. From the perusal of the aforesaid orders, it appears that the representation has been rejected without recording any reason whatsoever. The orders are patently illegal and are liable to be set aside. This petition is, accordingly, allowed at the motion stage itself. The impugned orders (Annexures P-3 & P-4) are hereby set aside and competent authority is directed to pass a fresh speaking order after affording opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said authority. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 27.4.2010. lucky