In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 2699 of 2008 Date of decision: May 18, 2009 District Council for Child Welfare Sirsa and others .. Petitioners Vs. Krishan Kumar .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Sanjeev Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Advocate for the respondent. A.N. Jindal, J The trial court vide order dated 29.5.2003, had restrained the defendants from re-auctioning the premises in dispute till the disposal of the suit. The said order passed in the shape of ad-interim injunction was not varied, reversed or modified in appeal. Thereafter, even despite the said order the petitioners tried to re-auction the shops on 11.10.2007. In these circumstances, the trial court as well as appellate court have rightly observed that in the given circumstances of the case, second effort of auction of the shop in question despite injunction is unwarranted. Resultantly, it could well be observed that both the courts below did not commit any illegality in passing the orders regarding staying the re-auction. However, some concession could be given to the petitioners in connection with the payment of costs. As such, this petition is dismissed with the modification in the order that the costs as awarded by the lower appellate court are reduced to Rs.2000/-. However, the trial court is directed to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible within six months. May 18, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge