IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13802 of 2007 Sunaina Devi, Wife of Shivnath Singh, Resident of Village Girdhar, P.S. Kateya, District Gopalganj. -------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Director, I.C.D.S. Directorate, Patna. 3. The Collector, Gopalganj. 4. The Block Development Officer, Pach Debri, District Gopalganj. 5. The Child Development Project Officer, Panchdebari Block, Gopalganj. 6. The Extension Officer, Panchdeori, Gopalganj. 7. Panchayat Sevak, Raj Magiya Block Pachdeori, Gopalganj. 8. Sangeeta Devi, Wife of Ajeet Singh, Chhitavna, P.S. Katiya, District Gopalganj. --------- Respondents ----------- 2 18.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. It appears that in respect of relief made in this writ application to the following effect; “1. That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ or writs, order or orders, direction or directions to the respondent authorities to consider to appointment of the petitioner to the post of “Anganbari Sebika” at village Girdhar Poyaiya Anchal Panchdeori District Gopalganj under the Child Development Project Officer as the petitioner had already selected in General Meeting held on 12/1/03 at Maghiya Panchayat at Centre No.148 Place Girdhar Poyaiya and on the basis of said Selection the respondent No.5 had 2 already issued the letter with regard to the selection of the petitioner at the post of Aganbari Sebika and also selection made under Aam Sabha held on 12/1/03 but uptill now petitioner was not joined by the respondent authorities where the post of the Anganbari Sebika and as such the action of the respondent authorities are quite illegal, arbitrary, malafide.” earlier a writ application was filed and in compliance of the order of this Court, an order has been passed by the Collector of Gopalganj district upholding the selection and appointment of Sangeeta Devi as Anganbari Sevika and Smt. Genia Devi as Anganbari Sahayika. Such order of the Collector, being appealable in nature, any further grievance of the petitioner, therefore, can be looked into and decided by the appellate authority, namely, Commissioner of the Division and accordingly, this application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Commissioner of the Division which will be disposed of on merit without insisting on the question of limitation taking into account the pendency of this writ application for over two years within a time 3 limit fixed as per the Circular of the State Government dated 10.12.2009. With the aforementioned observations and direction, this application is disposed of. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)