1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 4592/2007 (Pankaj Premanarayan Mishra VERSUS State of Mah. & others ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Pardhy, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Sonak, Assistant Government Pleader for the R-1 & 2. CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATE : MARCH 5, 2008. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was appointed on 01.06.2004 as a Junior Clerk in the office of respondent no.3. The respondent no.3, though has forwarded his proposal to respondent no.2 for grant of approval, however, the respondent no.2 vide communication dated 18.09.2006 addressed to the Chairman of the respondent no.3 Society, informed that the proposal forwarded by the society contains shortcomings which are mentioned in the said communication and respondent no.3 was asked to send proper proposal after taking care of the shortcomings. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that after repeated requests made to 2 the management, the management has not taken any step in view of the communication dated 18.09.2006, and therefore, appropriate direction be given to the management. The counsel for the respondent no.3 management is absent. However, since the matter is pending in this Court for a long time and we are not required to adjudicate on any issue, we dispose of the writ petition with the direction to the management to consider the issue in question and if the petitioner is otherwise eligible, then, take appropriate steps according to law, by forwarding the proposal of the petitioner for grant of approval. However, if the petitioner is not otherwise eligible then, decision in this regard also, be communicated to the petitioner by the management. With these observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. So far as the issue of payment of salary is concerned, it is kept open. JUDGE JUDGE APTE