Civil Revision No. 2144 of 2006 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2144 of 2006 Date of decision: 26.03.2009. Avtar Singh ....Petitioner Versus Smt. Rajinder kaur ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Ms. Jatinderjit Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dhirinder Chopra, Advocate for the respondent. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. It is common ground that a decree for restitution of conjugal rights came to be passed in favour of respondent-wife- decree bolder and against the petitioner-husband-judgment debtor. The respondent-wife filed an execution application on an averment that the petitioner herein had not complied with that decree. On that presentation, orders for the attachment of his property were ordered to be issued. Learned counsel for the respondent is not in a position to explain how the impugned order can be sustained. The decree of restitution of conjugal rights cannot be enforced in the indicated Civil Revision No. 2144 of 2006 -2- **** manner. If a party against whom a decree for the restitution of conjugal right was granted does not comply with, it is for the party opposite to apply for whatever further relief is permissible under the provisions of Hindu Marriage Act. The petition shall stand allowed accordingly. The impugned order shall stand set aside. March 26, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge