IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL No.957 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 14.08.2008 in W.P.No.17365 of 2008 on the file of the High Court) Between: Global Green Company Limited, a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act, 1956, having its Registered Office at 14, 80 ft Road, 4th Block, Koramangala, Bangalore - 560 034 and one of is plants at Venkatapur Unit, Kohir Mandal, Medak District - 502 321, Rep. byits Unit, Head, Mr. S. Suresh. ... APPELLANT AND 1 The Chairman, Industrial Tribunal-II, 2nd Floor, Chandra Vihar Moajam Jahi Market Road, Nampally, Hyderabad - 500 001. 2 The President/General Secretary, Global Natural Products Employees Union, Regd.No. A-3572, Affiliated to BMS Tilak Bhavan, TRT - 141, Street No.9, Jawahar Nagar, Hyderabad. 3 Commissioner of Labour, Andhra Pradesh, T. Anjaiah Karmika Sankshema Bhavan, RTC "X" Roads, Hyderabad - 500 020. 4 State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Deputy Secretary to the Government, Labour Employment Training and Factories (Lab-I) Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: MR.C.R.SRIDHARAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following: Order: (Per HC, J) This appeal has been ﬁled against interim order dated 14.08.2008 passed in W.P.M.P.No.22560 of 2008 in W.P.No.17365 of 2008. Looking to the fact that the appeal has been filed against an ad-interim order, in our opinion, it would be just and proper if the concerned respondent is directed to ﬁle counter aﬃdavit in the petition which is pending before the learned single Judge at an early date. Learned Advocate appearing for Respondent No.2-Employees’ Union has fairly submitted that counter affidavit shall be filed before 29.09.2008. It has been submitted by the learned Advocate for the appellant- employer that in the course of conciliation some oﬀer was made by the appellant-employer on certain conditions and the learned single Judge, ignoring the conditions, relied upon the oﬀer which was made in the course of conciliation. Be that as it may, as the appeal has been ﬁled against an ad-interim order, we are not inclined to go into the merits at this stage. In the circumstances, we do not interfere with the order passed by the learned single Judge with a hope that the learned single Judge shall decide the question with regard to grant or modiﬁcation of interim relief after hearing the concerned Advocates and after considering all relevant factors. W.P.M.P.No.22560 of 2008 in W.P.No.17365 of 2008 shall be notiﬁed for hearing on 30.09.2008 for further orders before the learned single Judge hearing writ petitions relating to the subject matter in question. The appeal stands disposed of as above with no order as to costs. __________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ. _______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. September 25, 2008 MRR N.B. Furnish C.C. tomorrow B.O.