IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 6th day of April, 2010 Ist Bail Application No. 391 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Aneesh .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 19/2010, U/s 420, 504, 506, 451, 417 IPC, PS Kotwali Jwalapur, District Haridwar. April 6, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant argued that the applicant is not named in the FIR and he was arrested on 24.1.2010 and from his possession two articles of yellow metals have been shown to be recovered and further submitted that these types of articles are not mentioned in the FIR. He further submitted that co-accused Tauseef and Mobin have been released on bail by the order dated 15.2.2010 and 17.3.2010 passed by the In-charge Sessions, Judge, Haridwar and Sessions Judge, Haridwar respectively and the accused applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. He also submitted that the applicant has no previous criminal history. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Aneesh be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 6.4.2010 2 PRABODH