IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.36107 of 2010 Abdul Mazid, S/o Late Md. Habib, Resident of Village Purani Basti Road, Jugsalai, P.S. Jugsalai, District Jamshedpur (Singbhum, Jharkhand)……………………………………………………………..Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar……………………..Opposite Party ----------- 2 12.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. The case is under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code and later on, Section 506 of the I.P.C. was also added. Referring to Annexure-2 series, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even after institution of the case, business is going on between the firm of the informant with the firm of the petitioner. He submits that in fact, it is a case of accounting and of outstanding dues and not a case of criminal breach of trust. Learned counsel for the State has verified Annexure-2 series and accepted the fact that in between two firms, business is still continuing. Petitioner is in jail since 03.09.2010. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this application is allowed. 2 Let petitioner (Abdul Mazid) be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in connection with Khajekala P.S. Case No.65 of 2010, G.R. No.1054 of 2010 with conditions as laid down in sub-section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)