1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2661 OF 2010 (Anil Kumar P. Barange and another vs. Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 9, 2011 Heard Shri Sudame, learned Counsel for the petitioners, and Shri Kulkarni, learned Counsel for the respondent. Shri Sudame, learned Counsel for the petitioners, states that the petitioners are the students, who were given admission in the Part Time B.E. Course after doing their diploma and, therefore, they are required to appear and pass in the subject of Mathematics – Part I and Part II. It is submitted that so far as students, who have taken admission in the regular B.E. Course are concerned, they are not 2 required to pass examination in the subject of Mathematics. It is, therefore, contended that action of the respondent is discriminatory and cannot be sustained in law. Shri Kulkarni, learned Counsel for the respondent, states that the competent Body, which is required to look into this aspect, has not yet been constituted, however, it is in the process and as and when such Body is constituted, the issue raised in the petition shall be considered by the competent Body and appropriate decision accordingly shall be taken. In the backdrop of the above statement made by learned Counsel Shri Kulkarni, which is reflected in the affidavit filed by the respondent, cause of action in the petition no more survives. The petition is disposed of accordingly. However, we expect the respondent University to expedite the said process. JUDGE JUDGE khj 3