IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3196 of 2005 UMA PANDEY . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 14 21.05.2010 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Singh, learned A.C. to Mr. Vivekanand Kunwar, counsel representing the Magadh University and Mr. Anant Kumar, learned A.C. to S.C.11 for the State are present. Learned counsel for the University with reference to a supplementary counter affidavit filed in the present proceeding on 17.11.2008 submits that the entire admissible dues of the petitioner has since been paid to him and which has been detailed in the said supplementary counter affidavit. He further submits that there is to rejoinder on behalf of the petitioner controverting the said statements. From a perusal of the supplementary counter affidavit, I find that most of the grievance of the petitioner stood redressed in the year 2008 or before that. The very fact that the petitioner has not chosen to raise any grievance thereto demonstrate that no grievance 2 subsist. Having regard to the statements made in the supplementary counter affidavit of the University, the writ petition is disposed of. Bibhash ( Jyoti Saran, J.)