CM Nos.9820 to 9822-CII-2010 and -1- FAO No.2070 of 2010 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CM Nos.9820 to 9822-CII-2010 and FAO No.2070 of 2010 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 21.4.2010 **** Union of India through Garrison Engineer (W) Pathankot, District Gurdaspur. . . . . Appellant VS. M/s Lalit Bhatia & Co. and another . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN **** Present: - Ms.Kulwant Kaur Kahlon, Advocate for the appellant. **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J. (ORAL) CM Nos.9820-CII-2010 For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay of 32 days in refilling the appeal is hereby condoned. CM stands disposed of. CM Nos.9821 & 9822-CII-2010 Allowed as prayed for. FAO No.2070 of 2010 (O&M) Learned Counsel for the appellant, inter alia, contends that the learned First Appellate Court did not decide ground No.XIX, which was pressed before the Court. In this regard, this Court cannot take a decision as it has been held by the Supreme Court in the case of “State CM Nos.9820 to 9822-CII-2010 and -2- FAO No.2070 of 2010 (O&M) of Maharashtra Vs. Ramdas Shrinivas Nayak” AIR 1982 SC 1249 (1) that the record of the Court cannot be challenged before the Appellate Court on the ground that order is wrongly recorded and all that has to be done by the litigant is to approach the same Court by way of an application of review, if any. In these circumstances, the appellant, if so advised, may file review application before the learned Court below. Dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 21.4.2010 JUDGE Vivek