1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3916 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO.2257 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax-11 ..Appellant Mumbai V/s. Raj Kanwar ..Respondent Mr.A.D.Kango with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, Advocate, for Appellant Mr.Parag S. Savla with Mr.Ajay R. Singh, Advocate, for Respondent CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE,JJ. DATE : 29TH JANUARY, 2008 P.C. . This is a Notice of Motion for condoning a delay of 232 days in filing of the main appeal. On perusal of the affidavit in support we find that the file was sent to the Panel Counsel on 24th February, 2006 and the draft appeal was received on 5th October, 2006. A period of 8 months cannot be said to be reasonable. It is also seen that tax effect in the case is less than 4 lakhs. In the circumstances, the cause shown is not sufficient 2 cause. Hence, the Notice of Motion stands dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)