c1. .-„..';... s;? :.'...- .^.': iQQ f --- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURB AT BILASPUR W.P. f c) No. ^33 /2011 PETITIONBR i^' ^•-^>^\^ <....^<:>'".,AW" ..•••'" ^;...--^v Ganesh Das S/0 Shri Manglu Aged about 55 years Occupation Kotwar R/0 Village Tendwa Tahsil Abhanpur Dist Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS: VBRSUS (1) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary , Department of Revenue Mantralaya,D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur ( C.G.) (2) Collector, Raipur Dist-Raipur (C.G.) (3) Chief Bxecutive Officer New Raipur Development Authority Telibandha Jedhi Vila Near Natioanl Garage Ring Road Raipur Dist Raipur ( C.G.) WKJT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .tliu-.^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS HIGH_C^OURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 5839 OF 2011 Ganesh Das Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others ashok (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Ms. Deepali Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Murthy, Dy. Advocate General for the State/ respondents No.1 & 2. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Advocate forthe respondent No.3. OR&ER (Passed on this 29th day of September, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the respondents may be directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner for allotment of alternative land in compliance of the directions of the Adarsh Rehabilitation Policy df the Chhattisgarh State, 2007 and thereafter, acqyire the land granted to the petitioner, as service land. 2. IVIs. Deepali, further submits that in an identical matter i.e. Kotwar Association of Chattisgarh v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others, this Court has disposed of the petition of the Kotwar Associaton by giving the members an opportunity to file individual applications/ representations with a direction to consider and decide the same in accordance with law and in accordance with the provisions of the Adarsh Rehabilitation Policy of the Chhattisgarh State, 2007. Thus, this petition may also be disposed of in the same terms. 3. Learned counsel appearing fo.r other side do not controvert the above submission and submit that they have no objection if the petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed in Kotwar Association of Chhattisgarh (supra). 4. In view of the above submissions made by learned eounsel appearing for the parties, this petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed in Kotwar Association of Chhattisgarh (supra) i.e. the petitioner may file a fresh application before the appropriate authority in accordance with law for grant of patta/allotment of land and if such application is filed, it shall be disposed of by the concerned authority in accordance with the revenue laws and also keeping in mind the provisions of the Adarsh Rehabilitation Policy of the Chhattisgarh State, 2007. ,——- - -—.^. ~ "-'~" ^' • i!, ' Sd/- SATISH K. ANGNmORI Judge