HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 5616 OF 2010 ORAL ORDER: Challenging the order dated 9th September, 2010 passed by the District Judge, Guntur, in T.O.P. No. 1019, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. Petitioners herein filed T.O.P No. 1019 of 2010 under Section 24 of CPC with a prayer to withdraw O.S.No. 31 of 2010 pending on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri and transfer the same to the file of IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur to try along with O.S.No. 539 of 2009. That Transfer OP was dismissed holing that the cause of action in both matters is different, distinct and no prejudice would be caused and question of conflicting decisions would not arise, in case the matters are tried by two different courts, and consequently dismissed the petition. Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the entire reasoning of the Court below is erroneous and the order suffers from lot of irregularities and therefore, the order passed by the Court below is liable to be set aside. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and also perused the entire material made available on record. As seen from the record, O.S.No. 31 of 2010 was filed by the respondents herein on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri, for the relief of declaration to declare that the sale deed dated 19.2.2007 executed by D1 in favour of D2 is null and void, whereas the suit in O.S.No. 81 of 2008 was filed by the petitioners herein on the file of IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur, for the relief of specific performance of contract of sale dated 18.12.2006 executed by the defendants in favour of plaintiffs. Therefore, the relief claimed in both suits are not connected to one another though the schedule property is one and the same. Therefore, the court below rightly dismissed the Transfer OP holding that the cause of action in both the matters is different and distinct. Hence, I see no reasons to interfere with the order passed by the Court below and the Civil Revision Petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J DATE: 24.12.2010 KA