IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1648 of 2010 BALI BHADRA CHOUBEY, Son of late Sheo Kumar Choubey, R/o village Bilaspur, P.S. Chenari District Rohtas …… Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ….. Opposite Party ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr. Uma Shankar Pd. Singh, A.P.P. ---- 3 09.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 420, 418 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code . It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is an old person aged about 75 years and he became Director on the request of his son and he resigned from the post of Director on 6.11.1998 i.e. much before the lodgement of the complaint case and in support of such submission learned counsel has placed reliance upon Annexure 2. It is submitted that the main person in the Company is co-accused, namely, Shiv Shankar Choubey. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner is in custody since 26.2.2009. Petitioner has filed - 2 - supplementary affidavit giving a list of 13 cases pending against him. It is submitted that all cases arise out of the offence which relates to Kaimur Finance Company Limited and in majority of the case he has either been granted bail or has been acquitted from the charges. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, BALI BHADRA CHOUBEY, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Complaint Case No. 412 of 2001, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial - 3 - before the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation then the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. Spd/ (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)