HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : B‘LASPUR WRIT PETITEON (CL) NO“ 2768 OF 2009 Khemdas Sahu. S/o Late Shri Davaram Sahu, aged abaut 52 years, R/d PH. No.16, Baigapara, Durg, Viilage U.ria, D§strict Burg (CG). Versus S PETITEONER RESPONDENTS 1. tate of Chhattisqarh‘ through Secretarv Hcme Depanrgent; DKE‘: BhawaEI: Mamraiaya, Raipur (CG). 2. Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Buieau, Raipuf (CG). , 3. Mr. Manoi Khimdi, D.S.P. Anti Cormption Umt, Raip'ur (CG). 4. Mr. 8.8. Rathore, inspestar, Anti Cerruptien Unit. Raipur (CG). _ 5. The Coiiecior, Dietrict Durg (CG). i {Wiit petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. ~ Ptesent 1- Shri T.K. Tiwari, counsei for the petitioner. - Shri Vivek Sharma, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER ORAL (Passed en this 16 day of Juiy. 2009) be issued under Article 226 of the Constitution of indie against the \ —A/ \ ‘1. Heatd teamed counse! for the patties. 2. By this petition, the petitioner impugns the order dated 14-5—200Q (Annexure — Pt?) passed by the Special Judge {Prevention of Corruption), Burg, in crime No.0l09 (State of Chhattisgarh vs. Shri Khemdas Sahu) and further seeks a direction to the respondent No.1 to initiate enquiry against the tespondents No.2 & 3 and punish them for their misconduct in performance of their public dutv. 3. There are two chaiieng'es in this writ petition. So far as first chaiienne is concerned, the iaw’is Weii settied that no writ no can % judicial arder. Thus, this writ petition is not maintainabie. As far as the second prayer is cancerned, when the matter i3 still pending consideration no such action can be taken, which amounts to inierfemece of the iudicial proceedings. (See Nafesh Shridhar Mirajkar vs. State of Maharas‘htra1 and Radhey ‘ $hyam and Another vs. Ghhabi Math and Othersz). 4. in view of foregoing, this writ petition is dismissed as not maintainabie. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ‘i i Gowri V \‘ x