1 CA3835/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3835 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra Applicant V E R S U S Bhimraj Genuji Avhad Respondent Shri D.R. Kale, A.P.P. for the applicant Shri S.S. Jadhavar, Advocate for the respondent CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 25th November, 2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned Advocates of both sides. 2. An anticipatory bail came to be granted in favour of the respondent vide order dated 28th July, 2010, passed by the learned Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar. This order was challenged by the State in Misc. Criminal Application No. 749 of 2010. The co-accused were found in possession of arms and bullets. According to the prosecution, in the course of their interrogation, they informed to the police that they had purchased the bullets from the present respondent. On these facts, the applicant / State prayed for cancellation of bail of the respondent. Today, except the bare word of the co-accused that the present respondent sold bullets to them, no other material has been produced. In my view, the statement of the co- accused by itself cannot be used to say that a prima facie case is made out 2 CA3835/10 against a particular person against whom the allegations are made. If this be so, the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar was rightly granted the anticipatory bail. Hence, no interference is required in the order dated 28th July, 2010. Consequently, the present application stands dismissed. ( R.Y. GANOO, J. ) SRM/ca/3835/10/25/11/11