1:-'\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.No.03of2009 AooUcant/ PetitiojiCT Respondeiits M/sShri Bhawani Rice Mill, ITirough: Its Partoer Nai'smg Das Bhootda, S/o Late Shri Madan Lal Ji Bhootda, aged about 48 years, Registered Office at Chandrakhuri, District Durg(CG). VER8US 1. Central Bajnk of hidia A company corporate, Constituted under fhe Bankmg Companies (Acquisition and Traiisfer of UndCTtaking) Act, 1970, Throu^i The Managing Director, Head Office at Chandramukhi, Nariman Pomt Mumbai (Maharashtra). 2. The Regional Manager, Central Bank of Inctta, Regional Office,Raipur(CG). 3. Branch Manager Central Bank of India, Braach Durg at Rungta Bhawan, GE Road, Durg, District Chhattisgarh (CG). (Application fbr correction oftypographical naistake in order dated 05.12.08) {SB: Hontble Mr. Sattsh K. Aenihotri. J.^ Present Shri P.R. Patarikar, Advocate fortiie applicanVpetitioner. None for the respondents. OBALORDER (Passed on 14UI day ofJaimary, 2009) 1. The petitioner, by this petition, seeks correction of typographical mistakes crept in the order dated 05.12.08 passed in W.P.(C) No. 1807/08. 2. Qn hearing leamed counsel appearing for tiie applicaitt, and pemsal of Ifae papers, it is evident that inadvertaitly some typo^raphical mistakes have arept in in para 2 offhe order dated 05.12.08. The same may be read as under: trLeamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that tiie instairt petition was filed cn the ground that no Presidmg Officer in Debts Recovery Tribunal (for short 'DRT') at Jatmlpur was available to hear t&e -matter. He ftirther submits that the respondent Baric has ah-eady filed an application being OA. No. 141/03 under Section 19 ofthe Securitization aiid Reconstmction ofFmajicial Assets and Enforcem^it ofSecurity Interest Act, 2002 (for short the Act, 2002'), before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Jabalpur (for short 'DRT, Jabalpur'), agaitist tiie recoverv oroceedinffs. aadtihe same is oendine consideration." 3. In para 4 also, the word "that since the petitioner has already preferred an appeal" may be read as "that since fhe respondent Bank has already preferred an application". 4. In para 5, fhe word "and iurttier that fhe petitioner has already filed an appeal" may be read as "and further that Ihe respondent Bank has already filed an application". 5. Further, fhe word "to pursue the pending.appeal" may be read as "to puraue fhe pending application". 6. The order dated 05. 12.2008 shall be amended by Ifais order after correction of typographical mistakes, a new certified copy ofthe order may be issued. 7. Accordingly, fhis petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ainit