IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3008 OF 2009 Bijendra Ramkailash Singh ...Petitioner V/s. M/s.SMGK Developers Pvt.Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.J.A.Udaipuri i/b Mr.Vinay S.Bharge for Petitioner. Mr.G.S.Godbole i/b Ms.Jai V.Kanade for Respondent No.12. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH 24, 2009. MARCH 24, 2009. MARCH 24, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard. No interference is warranted in exercise of writ jurisdiction against the interlocutory and discretionary order passed by the Court below. It is well established position that at any stage, it is open for the Trial Court to reframe the issues. That being the power of the Court and the discretion having been exercised by the Trial Court, the question of entertaining the Writ Petition does not arise. Moreso, the error : 2 : committed by the Court, if any, can also be corrected in case, the Petitioner is required to file Appeal or Revision against the final decision of the Trial Court as observed in Surya Dev Rai v. Surya Dev Rai v. Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai & Ors. reported in (2003) 6 SCC Ram Chander Rai & Ors. reported in (2003) 6 SCC Ram Chander Rai & Ors. reported in (2003) 6 SCC 675 675 675 (see Para 39 thereof). 2. In the circumstances, this Petition is dismissed, leaving all questions raised in this Petition open, to be decided at the appropriate stage. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.