IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32438 of 2010 PARWEZ ALAM @ MD.PARWEZ ALAM @ MD.PRAWEZ ALAM Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Nemat Anwari @ Sony ----------- 4/ 02.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the complainant, Mr. Nafisuzzoha. Petitioner is alleged for causing cruelty for demand of dowry. Admittedly, before filing of this complaint case, matrimonial case for restitution of conjugal rights is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Maintenance is filed after filing of this case. According to the learned counsel, petitioner in planned way to justify torture, started with informatory petition to matrimonial case, while according to the learned counsel for petitioner, complainant herself is not willing to reside with the petitioner. His every attempt to reconcile the matter went in vain and only to cast pressure for illegal gain, this case is lodged. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 1053 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be 2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Madhepura subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)