HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5293 of 2010 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioners herein who are the plaintiffs seeks to assail the order, dated 02.09.2010, passed by the XIX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in I.A.No.635 of 2010 in O.S.No.1536 of 1997, whereunder the application purportedly filed by them under Order 18 Rule 17 read with Section 151 C.P.C., praying to recall P.W-2 for his re- examination by the plaintiffs’ counsel, was dismissed, by way of filing this Revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The Court below taking note of the reasons given by the plaintiffs in the affidavit, filed in support of the application, did not find in their favour and accordingly, dismissed the same. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and on a perusal of the relevant material on record, it could be seen that the only reason given by the petitioners herein-plaintiffs seeking to recall P.W-2 for his re-examination was that their counsel forgot to re-examine P.W-2 after his cross-examination and therefore, he prays to give an opportunity to re-examine P.W-2. I am not satisfied with the reason assigned by the plaintiffs for re-examination of P.W-2. The Court below has rightly exercised its discretion and passed the impugned order, which cannot be found fault with. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, at the stage of admission. However, there shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, HACJ 19th November 2010 DR