IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22094 of 2009 1. MUZAFFAR 2. BIBI HASAN BANO 3. RASSUL 4. KHATIZA 5. SALEHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.26665 of 2009 NUSALLIM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 08.09.2009 Both matters arise out of the same occurrence giving rise to a complaint case instituted under Section 498A of Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of D.P. Act. Present case germinates out of a complaint lodged by the estranged wife of petitioner of Cr. Misc no. 26665 of 2009. In Cr. Misc. No. 22094 of 2009, the petitioners are in laws such as father-in-law, mother-in-law, sister-in-law and brother-in-law. It is contended that the allegations against the in-laws are general and omnibus. Petitioner in Cr Misc. No. 26665/2009 is the husband. It appears from the complaint that there is allegation of demand and torture against him. Having regard to the facts appearing from record, this court disposes of both the applications in the following manner: Let petitioners of Cr. Misc. No. 22094 of 2009 surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- 2 (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Katihar in connection with Complaint case no. C.A. 1/2008. This order is further subject to the condition that the petitioners shall appear in person on each and every date fixed in the Court below and cooperate in the trial of the case. So far petitioner of Cr. Misc. No. 26665 of 2009 is concerned, this court finds that there is allegation. He being the husband has certain duty to perform. Merely stating before this court that he is ready to keep his wife is not enough. The application (Cr. Misc. No. 26665/2009) has no merit. It is accordingly, dismissed. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )