HNN"^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Contempt Case (C) No.^1^^01 1 sin8te'E (Arising out ofOrder dated 18.01.2011 passed in WP(S) No. 4445/2010) - PETITIONER: Ramlal S/o Shri Kartik, aged about 63 years occupation - retired Gangman in pennanent Gang, Office of Sub Works Department, Sub Division Bemetara, District Durg (CG), R/o Ddolia, Charbhata, Post Jhal, Bemetara, District Durg (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENT R.P. Rathiya, Undersecretary, Govt. ofC.G., Public Work Department, CONTEMNOR ^s3^^ ^s^^s-Ehavan> .••<>^' .^^^ ^/^' -^,^":.'.-^^' CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTirUTION OF INDIA READ WITjiSECTION 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 XI-HC—78 ^IT^T^T^N? 'cTm ^ii^T *^tJ<=h »ITH<Pir(hNlcb •y^ ^ii^id^, ^Ti1^TT^, l^rraTp: ^_..C£^.:..C^&O^^.U'^ 200 r\^ W^T Tra15F ('^I^^T) ^^TTW ^rf^T l3?H^T SB ; Hon^ble Shri Manindral 16.12.2011 None for fhe petitionerj By this petitiou, the of 18/01/2011 passed inW.|P has been pleaded fhat representation has not bee4 veriiicatiou, claim of the pe\ act ofdisobedience. It is found that the 8/06/2011 in which, it hasj the petitioner has been cor^ compliance of fhe order of been dismissed. In that view of the any representation on beha|f fhe action of the respondenl is dismissed. ^psifwih w^it ^ feTzt X^I^R '^3ffW3^T Mohac. Shrivastava, J. jeven in the second round. p^titioner has alleged willful disobedience >.S. N6. 4445/2010. In this petition, it ^hiJLe deciding the case of petitioner, tiie correctiy decided and without proper |:itioner has been rejecfed, which is an [respondent has passed an order on 1 been stated that fhe representation of ddered and case has been decided in (pourt. The claim of fhe petitioner has m^tter and in the absence of there being of the petitioner to demonstrate Iiov/ amounts fo disobedience, the petiuon Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge