IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.7455 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.12.2011 Shanti Lal -----Petitioner Vs. Ashwani Kumar -----Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present:- Mr. Anupam Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Rekhi, Advocate for the respondent. --- RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J. This is tenant’s revision petition challenging the impugned orders of the authorities below, whereby he has been ordered to be evicted from the premises in dispute. On December 06, 2011, following order was passed by this Court:- “This is tenant’s revision petition challenging the impugned orders of eviction passed by the Authorities below. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the caveator-respondent has stated that in C.R. No.7455 of 2011 execution of the impugned orders, possession has been taken by the respondent-landlord. Counsel for the petitioner seeks a short adjournment to enable him to get instructions. Adjourned to 12.12.2011.” Today, Shri Anupam Bhardwaj, Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner very fairly stated that the respondent has taken possession of the demised premises in execution of the impugned orders and there was no stay against the aforesaid orders. At this stage, only prayer made before this Court is that the petitioners be given some time as they have no other place to live in and they undertake to voluntarily vacate the premises in dispute if the possession is restored to them. Shri K.S. Rekhi, Advocate appearing for the respondent stated that the submission made before this Court is again factually incorrect as the son of the petitioner is owner of an adjoining house and the petitioner has shifted to the said house. The said fact could not be disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. Thus, the aforesaid submission is without any merit. No other argument is raised. Dismissed. December 12, 2011 ( RAKESH KUMAR GARG ) ak JUDGE 2