... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.261 OF 2006 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.2553 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Ms Vaidehi Kamat holding for Shri P.M. Pradhan for the Applicant. Shri R.S. Ghadge holding for Shri A.S. Desai for the Respondent Nos.1,2,3B,3C,3E and 4 to 6. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 28, 2006. : JULY 28, 2006. : JULY 28, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Report of the bailiff dated 20th April, 2006 discloses that the Respondent Nos.3A and 3D have expired. No steps are taken within the time stipulated by the limitation. Hence, Application stands abated as against the Respondent Nos.3A and 3D. Heard the Advocates appearing for the parties. Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay of two days. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE