CWP(T) No. 5230 of 2008 23.6.2010 Present: Mr. G. R. Palsra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. C. S. Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Vir Bahadur, Advocate, for the respondents. Mr. G. R. Palsra, learned Counsel has invited my attention to the fact that no disciplinary action was taken against Sh. Din Dayal who is also alleged to have mis-conducted during the course of employment. 2. After the matter was heard for some time Mr. G. R. Palsra, learned Counsel submits that his client be permitted to make a representation to the respondents, bringing on record various acts of illegality committed by the respondents and discrimination meted out to the petitioner. 3. Under the circumstances, without going into the merits of the case petitioner is permitted to make a detailed representation within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. In such representation petitioner shall raise all contentions and pleas. He shall also enclose copies of various decisions rendered by this Court as also the Apex court which are sought to be relied upon in support of the case. 4. The respondents are directed to decide the representation within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt thereof. Needless to add, if so required, petitioner shall be afforded adequate opportunity of hearing/representation. The contentions raised by the petitioner in the representation shall be adverted to and dealt with. The respondents/authorities shall assign reasons and supply copy of -2- the order to the petitioner. Liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the Court if need so arises subsequently. Petition stands disposed of. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. June 23, 2010 (PK)