IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO. 375 OF 2010. In the matter of the Companies Act 1 of 1956); AND In the matter of Section 391 to 394 read with Sections 100 to 105 of the Companies Act, 1956; AND In the matter of Scheme of Arrangement between MAESTROS MEDILINE SYSTEMS LIMITED and MAESTROS ELECTRONICS & TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS LIMITED and MMS INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED MMS INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Plot No. EL - 63, TTC Industrial Area, Electronics Zone, MIDC, Mahape, Navi Mumbai - 400 701. ) ) ) ) ) … Applicant Company. Called for Summons for Direction Coram: S. J. Vazifdar, J Date: 11th June, 2010 Mr. Rajesh Shah i/b M/s. Rajesh Shah & Co., Advocate for the Applicant MINUTES OF THE ORDER UPON the application of the Applicant Company abovenamed by a Summons for Directions AND UPON HEARING Mr. Rajesh Shah instructed by M/s. Rajesh Shah & Co., Advocate for the Applicant Company, AND UPON READING the Affidavit dated 11th day of May, 2010 of Mr. B. K. Tendulkar, Director of the 1 Applicant Company, in support of the Summons for Direction and the exhibit therein referred to, IT IS ORDERED:- 1. That the convening and holding the meeting of the Equity Shareholders of the Applicant Company to consider and approve the proposed Arrangement embodied in the Scheme of Arrangement between MAESTROS MEDILINE SYSTEMS LIMITED, the Transferor Company and MAESTROS ELECTRONICS & TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS LIMITED, the First Transferee Company and MMS INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, the Applicant / Second Transferee Company is dispensed with in view of the consents given by all the Equity Shareholders of the Applicant Company, which are annexed as Exhibits “H-1” to “H-7” to the affidavit in support of the Summons for Direction. 2. There are no Secured and Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant Company as mentioned in paragraph 20 of the Affidavit in support of Summons for Directions, hence, the question of convening and holding the meeting of Secured and Unsecured Creditors does not arise. (S. J. Vazifdar, J) 2