I IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 14 1H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C R KUMARASWAMY REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1256 OF 2005 (PAR) BETWEEN: SMT. MAHADEVI W/O SHANKARAPPA TARLAGATA AGE: 45 YEARS 0CC: AGRICULTURE R/O ADARGUNCHI HUBLI TALUK DHARWAD DISTRICT. . . .APPELLANT (BY SRIYUTHS: B Y HADIMANI, T G BALANNAVAR, ADVOCATES - ABSENT) AND; I. SMT.YALLAWWA @ KASTUREWA AGE: 60 YEARS W/O VEERAPPA SHYADEMBI 0CC: HOUSEHOLD AND AGRIL R/O NEERALAGI SHIGGAON TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT - 581 205. 2. SMT.SHAREWA AGE: 58 YEARS W/O CHANNABASAPPA SHYADAMBI 0CC: HOUSEHOLD AND AGRIL R/O NEERALAGI SHIGGAON TAWK HAVERI DISTRICT - 581 205. C. SMT. RAJESHWARI AGE: 40 YEARS W/O SHIVANAGOUDA 18 DYAMANAGOUDA UALLAGADD.I DCC: HOUSEHOLD R/O HATTIMAHUR SAVAN UR TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT 581 118. (BY SRI: UMESH R MAUMATH, ADVOCATE) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTiON 96 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 257.2005 PASSED IN OS.NO.296/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE PRLCIV1L JUDGE (SR.DN.), HUBLI, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPERATE POSSESSION, THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER The order sheet dated 4.2.2011 reads as under: “None appears for the appellant. Several ooporturihes have been qven for filing of the paper book, Hence list this matter next week for dismissaL” In spite of it, even today there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Learned counsel for the appellant has not done the n€edful. Therefore, this Rea;ular First Apcea’ is