AB 1138/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE H BARUAH Heard Mr NN Upadhaya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr BB Gogoi, learne d Addl. PP, Assam. The Dispur Police Statioin Case No 1002/2010 under section 394 / 302 / 34, IPC r ead with section 25(1-A) of the Arms Act, was registered basing on the FIR lodge d by one Shri Sushil Jalan of Swastik Distributors, International Hospital Compl ex, Guwahati-5, wherein it has been alleged that while his business partner Shri Ramesh Saraf proceeded to the Bank in his scooter to deposit an amount of ‘ 12, 00,000.00, three person suddenly stopped him and snatched away the entire money and when one of his employees Keshab Phukan tried to restrain the snatchers, he was shot him dead. Mr Upadhaya, learned counsel for the petitioner, contends that the petitioner is a driver by profession and he has to move along with the truck to different des tinations. Though he has a motor bike bearing registration No AS-01-AQ-4375, the same is lying idle in his house and whenever he visited Guwahati, he used to dr ive the same. During the investigation, the police has visited house of the peti tioner in search of the motor bike which is alleged to have been used in the inc ident. Accordingly, the petitioner apprehending arrest in connection with the af oresaid PS Case has approached this Court praying for extending the privilege of pre-arrest bail. I have carefully perused the Case Diary. The materials available in the Case Dia ry indicate that the petitioner had also hands in the robbery committed on 10.8. 10 at about 10.30 - 1045 AM. The availability of materials in the Case Diary do not suggest grant of privilege of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Accordingly the same is rejected. The bail applicant stands dismissed.