1 CR.APL NO.1046/2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903. APPLN/1046/2011 PRAKASH RAMBHAU ADE [Criminal] V/S THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.M.B.Vaishnav, Adv., for the applicant. Mr.K.M.Suryavanshi, AGP for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:26/4/2011 1. Heard. The accused/applicant, allegedly, abused the complainant, a retired Police Superintendent, by visiting his house on 7.2.2011, which gave rise to Crime No.20/2011 for infraction of Sections 452, 294, 504, 500 of IPC. Barring Section 452, other Sections are bailable. 2. Considering the track record, regular attendance, having caused by the accused/applicant, pursuant to earlier order dt.15th March, 2011, the interim protection needs to be extended till the trial. There is no criminal case against the accused/applicant. At the most, the accused/applicant 2 CR.APL NO.1046/2011 should be directed to refrain himself from committing and repeating same events as are attributed to him by virtue of report dt.7th Feb.,2011. Hence, order: ORDER (a) Interim protection dt.15th March, 2011, in Crime No.20/2011 is made absolute. The attendance condition is modified. The accused/applicant to attend the investigator on every Thursday and Sunday between 4 to 6 p.m. till 31st July, 2011. (b) the accused/applicant shall not commit an offense similar to the offense of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected. (c) the accused/applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police officer or tamper with the evidence. Application allowed in above terms. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/1046-11crapl