IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12827 of 2011 MUNSHI PRASAD & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 05.05.2011 Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 478, 504 of the I.P.C. The accusation against petitioner No. 1 is to have executed the sale deed in favour of one Ruby Devi on 07.02.2008. It is claimed by petitioner No. 1 that the land was initially purchased by his own brother and in partition the land fell into share of petitioner No. 2 hence the land was transferred. It is submitted by learned counsel for the complainant that the land fell into the share of the complainant by virtue of partition suit being Partition Suit No. 50 of 1978 which was between the complainant and his cousin brother and in pursuance to the execution case No. 1 of 1996 the land came into possession of the complainant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that execution is still going on. Learned counsel for the complainant does not deny the title of Ramchandra Prasad, petitioner No. 2 over the land but admits that decree was passed in 2 favour of the complainant. I think the grievance of the complainant can not be resolved in the present proceeding. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners namely 1. Munshi Prasad 2. Ramchandra Prasad, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Jehanabad in connection with Trial No. 3006 of 2010 arising out of Complaint Case No. 339 of 2010. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)