1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application No.1084 of 2010 [Prashant Bhanudas Wankhede .vs. State) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr.H.D.Dubey, Adv. for applicant. Mr.C.N.Adgokar, APP for respondent. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 4th August, 2010. Heard. Perused the case diary. From what is apparent, act of trespass is patent, however, version of the prosecutrix as regards rest of the events lets development of a feeling that the truth is besides what has been alleged. Moreover the overt acts are not alleged to be done because the prosecutrix is a tribal. 2 Circumstances propel a prima facie impression that the applicant may not be involved in the offence either u/s. 354 of IPC or provisions of SC ST (P.A.) Act. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. He be released on bail on furnishing personal bond and solvent surety in a sum of Rs.5000/-. Hamdast allowed. Judge jais