IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.1106-M of 2010 Date of Decision:25.8.2010 Kulwinder Kaur .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 to decide the representation dated 17.12.2009 made by the petitioner and take appropriate action against respondents No.4 to 6. Upon notice, reply has been filed by the State. As per the reply, the petitioner and respondents No.4 to 6 were summoned by the police on 12.2.2010. On 13.2.2010, the petitioner and respondents No.4 to 6 produced written compromise duly signed by them and other respectable persons. Respondent No.3 submitted his report on the complaint to respondent No.2. According to the terms and condition of the compromise, the petitioners and respondent No.4 are to file divorce petition before the Court on 12.3.2010 for dissolution of their marriage with mutual consent. The petitioner does not want any action on her application. In view of the reply filed by the State, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such. 25.8.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE