1 fca174.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.174 OF 2010 Princess Anthony Janardhan .. Appellant. Vs. Anthony Janardhan .. Respondent. Mr.Rohan Dharandale i/b R.S.Datar for the appellant. Ms.Saroj More for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE & M.L.TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATED : 22ND AUGUST, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the parties state that the parties have decided to dissolve their marriage by a decree of divorce by mutual consent under section 10(1)(x) of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, and they have accordingly placed on record consent terms duly signed by the parties and their advocates on record. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The parties are present in the court. They state that they understand English and they have gone through the consent terms. The appellant-wife, who is present in the court, states that she is employed and has her own income and, therefore, has agreed to dissolve the marriage without claiming any maintenance. The statements made by the parties in the S 2 fca174.10 consent terms are accepted. The family court appeal is disposed of in terms of the consent terms with no order as to the costs. The decree be drawn up accordingly. (M.L.TAHALIYANI, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)