IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 518 (MS) OF 2001 Hukum Singh ….…….Petitioner. Versus Dy. Director of Consolidation and others. ……Respondents. Mr. M.S. Tyagi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no. 1 to 4. Mr. Lok Pal Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5. 29th July, 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has challenged the orders dated 26.5.1996, 21.6.1997 , 7.8.1998 and order dated 17.8.2000 (Annexure No. 3, 5, 7 and 8 to the writ petitions) 2. The Consolidation Officer Roorkee allotted to the petitioner one Chak consisting of Khasra No. 93/1 area 0.799 Hectare, 93/2 area 0.050 Hectare, Khasra No. 94/M area 0.095 Hectare, Khasra No. 95 area 0.030 Hectare & Khasra No. 107/2 area 0.010 Hectare of total area 0.984 Hectare. The tenure holder raised objection before the Consolidation Officer and the Consolidation Officer allowed the objections which were filed by the tenure holders by order dated 11.45.1996. Thereafter, according to the petitioner, the Consolidation Officer 2 without hearing the petitioner reduced the value of the petitioner’s Khasra No. 333 from 100 paisa to 90 paisa by order dated 26-5-1996 and Khasra No. 333 M. was allotted to the respondent no. 5 to 8. The Settlement Officer Consolidation allotted two chaks to the petitioner; one Chak consisting of Khasra No. 93/1 area 0.483 Hectare, Khasra No. 93/2 area 0.020 Hectare, Khasra No. 94 area 0.091 Hectare, Khasra No. 107/1 area 0.008 Hectare, Khasra No. 107/2 area 0.070 Hectare and second Chak consisting of Khasra No. 333/2 area 0.220 Hectare and 334/3 area 0.016 Hectare. The total area of both the Chaks is 0.908 Hectare and amended C.H. Form 23 was prepared on the basis of order dated 21.6.1997. 3. Being aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner filed a revision under Section 48 of the Consolidation of Holdings Act and vide order dated 7.8.1998, the respondent no. 2 dismissed the revision of the petitioner and affirmed the order dated 21.6.1997 passed by the court below. 4. While dismissing the revision, the revisional Court after taking into consideration the entire evidence available on record has recorded a finding that the Original Holding of the revisionist/petitioner was 333/2, 93/1, 93/2 and the Chak has been allotted to him on the same Gata. The area of the original holding was 0-040 Acre and thereafter, in lieu of that area, he has got area 0- 908 acre, therefore, there is no need of any amendment. 5. In view of the above, since, both the courts below have recorded concurrent finding, therefore, I am 3 not inclined to interfere with the same under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and the orders passed by the courts below deserve to be confirmed. 6. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. (P.C. Verma, J.) 29.7.2008 Rathour