$§§§£§LE EE?¢!§E5‘E 0/6/7537 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) w.P. s No. ll 2010 PETITIONER / Anil Kumar Markam, S/o. Shri Shiv Prasad,. aged about 38 years, R/o. Post — Nagri, Tahsil — Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS / (1) State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) /('2) Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division (Samanya), Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) (3) Depot Officer, office of Depot Officer (forest), Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ./ 5, VV W mm w:&.u)..6§£b%\ C” m mm WW mm‘g‘d mmmw ‘ WWW wW a; m1?m .B.: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. PRITHNKER DIWAKER *99=12a2010: Shri Vinod Deshmu kh, couns Smt. Smita Ghai, P.L. for tha Grievance of the petitioner in though he is entitled for his re Guard, he has been regularized on t , Counsel for the petitioner su have completed all the formalities fo favour of the petitioner and therefo may be permitted to withdraw the to file a fresh representation befo same may be directed to be decide expeditiously as possible. Counsel for the. State submi the fact he cannot make any Government is Willing to regularize on the post of Forest Guard or objection if the petitioner makes authority concerned and. the accordance with law‘ /. Accordingly, the petition is that in the event of any representation before respondent No.2 raising his lfor thc petitioner. tats. the present petition is that tion on the post of Forest e post ofwatchman. mits that the respondents passing necessary onier in at this stage the petitioner resent petition with iiberty respondent No.2 and the in accordance with iaw as s that without ascertaining statement whether the State the services of the petitioner not. However, he has no a representation before the same is decided by it in disposed of with a direction filed by the petitioner grievances, the same is . ..................................... Wm W 200 ..............................................m ................................................ WW WW mW mmmw ‘ mw évwm m :Xpected to‘ be decided by the authority concerned in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authon'ty concemed ould be at liberty to decide the repiresentation of the petitioner _ trictly in accordance with law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge Mo EfCQ