’ M,” my“? ‘ ,g 1 (49 1m l, IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) 1595* W.P.C. N0. ...../O7 PETITIONER : /’/E.Ramendra Rao S/o E.Nageshwaf Rao Aged about 45 Years, R/o Link Road, Bilaspur Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS : /1’) C.G. State Cooperative Bank Limited, Through Branch Manager, Bilaspur Branch, Nehru chowk, bilaspur Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.) )Branch Manager C.G. State Cooperative Bank Limited Bilaspur Branch Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur (C.G.) Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.) f f WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI—HC—22 mm ‘ NP: .C.:.V mam WW x—; padma (32.02 ‘ 2007 On being menfioned, The n after is faken—up for hearing. Shri Rajeev Bh‘dr-af, couns :l for- The pe‘mioner. None for fhe responden'rs Heard. The impugned measures faken by The bank under Seciion 13 (4) of 1'he Sewri‘iisafion and Recorisfr’ucfion of Financial ‘Assei's and Enforcement of Securify Inferesf Act, 2002 (henceforih " fhe ACT") is appeaiable under Secfion 17 of flie Act Insiead of chaHenging the said aucfion proceedings before The a Jpeiiafe Cour‘r, The pe'rifioner has moved This CourT. When sTaTuTory remz dy is availabie wiTh The peTiTioner, I am of The view ThaT in The focTs and circumsTances of The case, This is noT an excepTional one in which This C 3urT shouid sTep in under ArTicie 226 of The ConsTiTuTion. In The resulT, The peTiTion deserves To be dismissed summariiy and is occardingly dismissed. . In The iighT of above order, M.(W.)P.No.402/2 7 & IA No.960/2007 sTand disposed of. Sdl- V.K.Shrivastava Judge (@W)