lEif ^ews'S ^ly^^ ^sis I^P^A^ (9 w ^ h IN.TJ _SGEOH,CgjOKT.<9r..JTJ&IJ£ATOTyBLATja^ {CBgaATTiBOjya 1X^TPETITXOS_Bro..:."_^o_ll_200B_. (8.B.I \<^^ ^^ RBSPOirDEirTS: - ,.^;.'^-.'- - ?:"..r:'i; < 'f'^fys, 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Sanjay Mishra, Age-37 Years S/o Late Shri O.N. Miahra By Ocoupation: - Sub-Inspector (M) Ahamad Husain, Age-42 Yrs. S/o Shri Late Noor Huaam By Occupation; - Subedar (M] K.L.Sahu Age-SSYears S/0 Late, ShriP. Sahu Occupation: -Subedar (M} S<M. Jatwar Age. 43 years S/o Shri AshaRam Occupationi. Sub-Inspeotor (M} K»R.Sahu Age,45 year® S/o Shri Umendram Sahu Qccupation: -Sub-Inspector (M} K.L, Choudhary Age. 42 Yrs S/o Shri Ram Choudhary, Oocupation; - Sub- Inepeotor (M) Anand Mohan PandcyAgc, 41 ycars S/o. Late Shri M.K. Pandey Occupation; - Sub- Inspector (Mj R.K.ChandeI Aged about42Yeara S/o Latc,Shri Ganpatram Chandel Sub- Inspector (M] Omkar Singh Tawer Aged about 40 Years S/o Shri Arjun Singh Sub«Inspector (M| Vajir Alam Aged about 53 year® S/o Farukh Ansat'i, Sube^ar " 4jl ^PU<>.n^ uhcf^y-hi < .;VBfi-8Wfbl?S%%%P, ^^.C<, .^,.,- 1. 2. The State of Chhattteaayh Through The Secretary, Home &PoIice AFPAIR8, D.K.S.Mantralaya Bhavan, Raipur {C.G.} The Becretary, yinance D.K.S.MajatraJAya Bhavan, Raipur {C.G.} rr. ^?. ^KIV^'^^ ^•wty ^^•^•i^.G.Bl^sPva l 3. Th®Dircetor Cteneral Of Home guarda, Mana Camp ^Raipur» Raipiir <C.G.} 4. T&c 8tat®OfItodhyR Pnulc»h» Through The Secretaryy Honie {PoUce) Department, Vaflabh Bhanran, Bhopal {aff.P.} WSSZT PBTITEOST UNOBSR ARTICLB 226 /227 OF THB COirSTITCTIOy OF IKDIA rOR THB I88UA1TCB OF THB DIRBCTIOir t. OR ORDZR (8t. vdTyq^l||<4lO)q,tJ»Tn'<-l<l<o,IqrtWyY ^TPT^T^^T^ Wt^T^f^ffcp ?TS?T3T^T8^TN .^..^....^.?.'...?ro.?.c^l. 3TT^5T q^P (^,c|i^6|c£i) ^2005" ^RTT^R ^TftcT 3n^$T petitio3|iers 13.06.2005 Shri Prakash Tiw^ri, les Shri Paiikaj Shrivaste respondents no.l, 2 aiid 3. Heard both fhe counsel The case of the Police Departnient (HoBie Gil They are posted as Sub-Insp] uuder tlie office 6f D,G,R, (C.G), Leanied counsel for petitioners are entitled foi pursuao.ee of the order of th^ dated 29.4.1984. Fui.lher subiiiission i| approached the State A\ M.A.No.218 of 2001 and 17.11.2001 passed fhe petitioners aiid in extended to fhose petitioners| otlier similai'lv situated Madhya Pradesh aiid tlie dated 10.12.2004 passed gran.tiiig benefit to ttie M.P.High Coiul directed thf benefits should be graated, ^nied cozuisel for the petitioners. ^va, Panel Lawyer for tlie State/ pursua4ce persjons G^lalior <oi^fc^41<rt +ii+ic^Y^rf^l<l^^i<< ^gri^T3^?T is that tliey ai'e workhig ia the |ards) in tlie State of Chhattisgarh. ?ctors (Miiiisterial) aad are ^vorknig Ipome Gziards, Maaa Camp, Raipur fljie petitioners submits tb.at aU the ad-hoc iacrease of Rs,70/- in- erstvvhile State. of Madlwa Pradesh i^ that simUarly satiated persons jiniin.istrative Tribunal by film.g the Tribuual vide itsa order dated for graiitiag benefit to tliose. of that tlie benefit has been I, It is also submitted tliat thereafter approached the High Court of Bench of that Court vide order |m W.P.No.3113/2004 ordered for lejtitioners. The Gwalior Bench of [t io. case of the petitioiiers similar orc|ler SP/FS/2005-20,000 VJ-OTI "qiqirt^, u>-al1<-i<i<?, Rirti^yx ^TPT^T^^T^ .^?.: f.'. .ro.°.\...^ ^^ W^200VT 3TT^5T q^? (^cli^cjcE;) 3T?^^Tcr?Tf^TTcp ^sTrw^^T^Hr^ \H ^TT^R WfiPT OT^^T -'L-- Leamed counsel 26.4.2005 passed in W.P.No the siniilaiiy placed persons <r>i<4Fo<nvi +<iHoT^rfe1^' ^Ri^-cj<< ^3lf^T3^ST natiire. In view of tlie above clamiiiig the saine benefit bei4.g sioiilarly placed persons. Havuig heard leained c' regard to the facts aiid circui^staiices ofthe case particiilarly the circunistaB.ee that this Court also refers to the order dated 11555/2005 by this Court in which |have been granted reHefs of above orders, these petitioners are also unsel for tiie petitioners and haviag ia W.P.No. 1555/2005 has du-ected that cases of the petitiouers 4fth.at petition be considered for tlie beiiefit of circular of Govertim.enfs orders dt 29.4.1984, it is directed tliat ia case the p^titioners are also smiUarly placed persons aiid workiiig as Miijiisterial Staff ro. tlie Honie Guards tlieii they should also be coi^siclered for the benefit of circular of Goveninients order dated 29, ft. 1984 iii a^cordaace with law, With the above direc^ions, this petition staads fiiiaUly disposed of. Coiisequently, I.A,No, 3f7'85/2005 also staiids disposed of C,C, asperrales, Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge v ^P/FS/2005-20,000./ ^ ^k^