IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.659 of 2007 1. Dasrath Singh son of late Dhari Singh 2. Arvind Kumar Singh 3. Rajan Kumar Singh @ Rajan Singh Both sons of Dasrath Singh, all residents of village Nandpur, P.O. Nandpur, via- Surajgarha, Tola Sonbarsa, P.S.Surajgarha, District Lakhisarai.……..Defendants 1st party-Petitioners. Versus 1. Kailash Singh son of late Pyare Singh, resident of village Nandpur, P.O. Nandpur, via-Surajgarha, Tola Sonbarsa, P.S.Surajgarha, District Lakhisarai. ……Plaintiff-Opposite party 1st set. 2. Mundrika Devi wife of late Balmiki Singh 3. Vandana Kumari daughter of late Balmiki Singh 4. Mumuch Kund Kumar minor son of late Balmiki Singh under the guardianship of his mother Mundrika Devi, All residents of village Nandpur, P.O. Nandpur, via- Surajgarha, Tola Sonbarsa, P.S.Surajgarha, District Lakhisarai. …..Defendants 2nd party-Opposite party 2nd set. 5. Kishundeo S/o late Pyare Singh, resident of village Nandpur, P.O. Nandpur, via-Surajgarha, Tola Sonbarsa, P.S.Surajgarha, District Lakhisarai. ……Defendant 3rd party-Opposite party 3rd set. For the petitioners : M/s Shrinandan Pd. Singh and Manoj Kumar No.1, Advocates. For opposite party no.1 : Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate. ----------- 02/ 15.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for opposite party no.1. 2. This civil revision has been filed by defendants 1st party-petitioners challenging order dated 03.01.2007 by which the learned Munsif, Lakhisarai, rejected their application raising preliminary objection with regard to the working of the Pleader Commissioner in Title Suit No.15 of 1996. 2 3. The aforesaid suit was filed by the sole plaintiff- opposite party no.1 for declaration of his title and recovery of possession with respect to the suit land and also for injunction and other ancillary reliefs. In the said suit defendants appeared and a Pleader Commissioner was appointed by the learned court below. It is also stated by learned counsel for the parties that the suit is at the evidence stage. 4. After some arguments leaned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this civil revision. Accordingly, this civil revision is dismissed as withdrawn. However, defendants 1st party-petitioners will be at liberty to cross-examine the Pleader Commissioner if the Pleader Commissioner has already deposed on behalf of the plaintiff. The defendants 1st party-petitioners will also be at liberty to produce their evidence controverting the report of the Pleader Commissioner and raise objection thereto at the time of arguments. 5. Since the suit is of 1996 the learned court below is directed to expedite its disposal. harish/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )