IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 5012 of 2011. Decided on: July 1, 2011. Neena Kaundal. Vrs. State of H.P. & ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Neeraj K. Sharma, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG for respondents No. 1 to 3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is a teacher appointed on PTA basis. She is aggrieved since the 4th respondent has been appointed in her place on regular basis. According to the petitioner, the 4th respondent can be accommodated, without any disturbance to her, in the nearby school, where there is vacancy. The petitioner may obtain the willingness of the 4th respondent and produce the same before the second respondent, in which case, the second respondent will take steps to accommodate the 4th respondent in the vacancy as pointed out by the petitioner, if available and in the resultant vacancy in case the petitioner is otherwise eligible and entitled, she may be engaged as PTA teacher, till she is replaced by a regular recruitee. The needful be done in three weeks. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. July 1, 2011. ( Justice V.K. Sharma), (karan/vs) Judge.