IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11747 of 2008 ================================================== Hanumat Singh son of late Damri Singh, Resident of Village-Goitha, Tola Bhaluhar, P.S. Bankey Bazar, district – Gaya. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Director of Consolidation, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Joint Director of Consolidation, Gaya. 4. The Consolidation Officer, Bankey Bazar, Anchal Amas District Gaya. 5. Rajbansh Singh. 6. Narnedra Singh. Both are sons of late Damri Singh, resident of village Goitha, tola Bhaluhar, P.S. Bankey Bazar, District- Gaya. .... .... Respondents ================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Pd.Singh Mr. Anita Raghvendra Mr. Abhishek For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Sc5) Mr. K N Jamuar ================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3. 24-04-2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since present writ petition is against order passed by the Joint Director, Consolidation under Section 35 of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956, this matter may be referred to the Tribunal, which has been constituted and functioning under the provision of Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009 (in short ‘Act’). This prayer Patna High Court CWJC No.11747 of 2008 (3) dt.24-04-2013 2 / 2 2 was made in presence of learned A.C. to Standing Counsel - V as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of private respondents i.e. respondent nos. 5 & 6. In view of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, which was not disputed by either of the respondents as well as in view of provision contained in Section 15 of the Act, the Registry is directed to transmit the record of the case to the Tribunal forthwith. Anay (Rakesh Kumar, J.)