The Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Raipur Vida interim ordar dated 24»1 1 .2001 directed to maintain status quo in regard to thc position of thé petitioner as was prevailing'on 1110,2001, By virtue of the interim order the petitioner is continuing at the onginal place of posting. Be that as it may: with the passage of time this petition has become inhnctuous as period-of tranefer is not appiicable forever, At this point of time, there is no question to examine the validity of the transfer order. However, the respondents are at liberty to pass’ appropn’ete order keeping in view the public interest and administrative exigency, ’without- insisting on ‘eompliance ofthe impugned transfer order. ’ It. is well settled principle of law that tranefer is an incident of serviee and it'is for the employer to decide as to where a> particular ohicer/eniployee be posted? keeping in View public interest as well as administrative exigenoy, This Court has limited jurisdiction to interfere in the transfer matter and this Court can interfere only'in the ease of proved malafide, non- eornpetence of authority passing the transfer order and transfer order not being in conformity with the rules and regulations. In view of the abovei this petition stands disposed of, No order as to eosts. sm— Sansh K. Agnihotri l Judge ‘ ‘