1 srk pil-36-09.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.36 OF 2009 Dani Sadan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and another. ... Petitioners Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others. ... Respondents Mr.Gautam Patel i/by M/s. ALMT Legal for the petitioners. Mr. K.K. Singhvi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Geeta Joglekar for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Milind More, Assistant Government Pleader for State-respondent No.4. Mr. R.A. Dada, Senior Advocate i/by M/s. Kishore Thakordas & Co. for respondent No.5. CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. Monday, March 07, 2011 P .C. Mr. Gautam Patel, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would like to withdraw this petition at this stage with liberty to file a fresh petition in case it becomes necessary to do so after hearing is completed by the Coastal Zone Management Authority. He, accordingly, prays for leave to withdraw the petition with liberty as aforesaid. 2. Mr. R.A.Dada, learned senior counsel for respondent No.5, Mr. K.K. Singhvi, learned senior counsel for respondent No.1 and Mr. Milind More, learned AGP stated that the present petition itself suffers from delay and latches and that, therefore, withdrawal of the petition at this stage and filing of any petition later on may not be treated as waiver of the objection of the respondents on the ground of delay and latches on the part of the petitioners. 2 srk pil-36-09.sxw 3. Accordingly, leave as prayed for is granted. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. All contentions are kept open. CHIEF JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.