IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application No. 131 of 2005 in Review Petition St.No.45907 of 2002 in Writ Petition no.3977 of 1996 Lataben Dilipbhai Desai ..Petitioner vs. 1. State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents Ms.T.K.Bairaydar i/b Shri M.P.Vashi for petitioner. A.G.P. for respondents nos. 1 and 2. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & D.G.KARNIK JJ. D.G.KARNIK JJ. D.G.KARNIK JJ. 24th February, 2006 24th February, 2006 24th February, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 and 2 who appears by waiving service. 2. In our view, no notice is necessary for respondent nos. 3 and 4 since registration was refused before notice. For the reasons stated in the application, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) subject to the condition that the petitioner shall remove all office objectionms within a period of 2 weeks. If the office objections are not removed within a period of two weeks hereof order refusing of registration shall stand. (D.G.KARNIK J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (D.G.KARNIK J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (D.G.KARNIK J.) (S.B.MHASE J.)