1 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 399 OF 2007 Vijayshankar B. Tiwari .. Applicant versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents ... Mr.Saikumar Ssridhankar i/b T.K.Sinha for the applicant. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh APP for the State. Mr.Milan Desai for respondent no.2. CORAM : D.G.KARNIK, J DATED : 3rd March 2008 P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. This bail application is filed by the applicant in the revision arising out of the proceedings u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The amount of the original cheque is 2 Rs.8,50,000/-. The complainant has deposited a sum of Rs.4,25,000/- in the trial court during the pendency of an appeal. He has deposited a further a sum of Rs.4,25,000/- in this court in revision. Thus entire amount of the cheque which has been awarded as compensation by the lower court has been deposited. Learned counsel for the applicant therefore prays for bail. 3. Counsel for respondent no.2 - original complainant opposed the application and submits that the applicant had been avoiding arrest in the past. He had initially furnished the wrong address and if bail is granted there is every possibility of applicant evading process of the court subsequently. In the circumstances, I pass the following order:- O R D E R . The applicant is granted bail in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the aggregate amount of Rs.50,000/- subject to the following conditions:- i) The applicant shall within one week of this order inform by Registered Post A.D. his present address to the respondent no.2. In the event of any 3 change of address he shall inform the respondent by Registered Post A.D. within 7 days. . Breach of any of the conditions would result to cancellation of bail. (D.G. KARNIK, J)