: 1 : FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO.10813 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST.) NO.10814 OF 2008 IN L.C.SUIT NO.418 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s . orders or directions and . Registrar’s orders . -------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Vijay Kumar with Mr.Prashant Kulkarni and Ms.Komal Kandharkar for the Appellants. Mr.N.B. Shah with Mr.Piyush Shah for Respondent No.1. Mr.F. Sayeed i/b Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co. for Respondent No.2. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 6TH MAY, 2008. P.C. : 1. The impugned order does not warrant any interference at this stage. The sub-station has already been constructed/partly constructed. The Appellants deny that the sub-station has been constructed. In any event, they : 2 : submit that it has not become operational. 2. It was contended that pursuant to an application under the R.T.I. Act, the B.M.C. has by a communication dated 7.4.2008 stated that no permission has been granted for erecting the sub-station. No doubt the sub-station can be operated only upon receiving all such permissions as may be necessary. Further it is always open to the Appellants to move an application for review if any on the basis of the letter dated 7.4.2008. 3. Moreover, it is clarified that the Appellants are not prevented from approaching appropriate authorities to seek reliefs in respect of the said sub-station including revocation of the permission for the same. It is not necessary at the ad-interim stage to consider the reliefs sought which will be considered at the final hearing of the Notice of Motion. 4. The Appeal from Order is : 3 : accordingly disposed of. The Civil Application is also disposed of.