IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10849 of 2002 Between: 1 V.Janaki Nirmala w/o V.Krishna Mohan 2 Guduri Madhavi w/o Ramesh Babu Both respresent by their GPA Holder,M/S Chaitanya Bharathi Housing & Properties (Pvt) Ltd. Rep., by its Manging Directo G.V.S.SriRam Prasad. S/o Pardhiva Rao, R/o 40-1-148, M.G.Road, Labbipet, Vijayawada, Kishna Dist ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Commissioner The Vijayawada Municipal Corporation Vijayawada, Krishna District 2 The Municipal Commissioner The Vijayawada Municipal Corporation Vijayawada, Krishna District 3 The Dy Country Planner The Vijayawada Municipal Corporation Vijayawada, Krishna District .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:MR. B.SRINARAYANA FOR MR.M.RAVINDRANATH REDDY Counsel for the Respondents:SMT.G.JHANSI The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in seeking to demolish building bearing No.23-13-7 of Tadankivari Street, Satyanarayanapuram, Vijayawada, without communicating the order passed in pursuance of show cause notice, dated 15.11.2001, as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that subsequent to the filing of this writ petition, the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.901, dated 31.12.2007 providing for regularization of unauthorized constructions and that in pursuance of the said G.O., the petitioners already applied for regularization. The learned counsel stated that in view of this subsequent event, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is therefore, dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to pursue the application for regularization. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 19th FEBRUARY, 2009. kvni