IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD MARCH 2010 / 12TH PHALGUNA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 775 of 2010() ----------------------------- CRA.251/2007 of ADDL.SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC)-II, KOTTAYAM CC.420/2005 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, ERATTUPETTA .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER/COMPLAINANT: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- K.E.HAROON, S/O.IBRAHIM, KUNTHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, ERATTUPETTA P.O., KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.BABY THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): ACCUSED: --------------------------------------------- 1. K.H.SALIM, KUNTHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, ERATTUPETTA P.O., KOTTAYAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.ROJO J.THURUTHIPARA FOR R1 THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.R.P. No.775 of 2010 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 03.03.2010 ORDER The accused in C.C.No.420 of 2005 on the file of the J.F.C.M, Erattupetta for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against him concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A.No.2287of 2010 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsel. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. Dated this the 3rd day of March , 2010. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. sj