IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1235 of 2004 SIKANDAR SINGH SON OF LATE DEO KUMAR SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KUTUBPUR, P.S. DORIGANJ, DISTRICT SARAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Chandrasekhar, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha & Mr. A. K. Das For the State :- Mr. S. S. Sundaram, A.C. to A.G. For the Accountant General :- Mr. L. P. K. Rajgrihar, Addl.S.C. ------ 5 08/07/2010 After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State, this Court is not convinced about the submission made at the Bar that the pay scale given to the petitioner and the order passed by the respondents contained in letter No. 1966 dated 24.7.2003 contained in Annexure-7 really falls foul of any law. However, there is insistence on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that looking at the higher qualification which the petitioner had at the time of appointment in the department which he had served, he was entitled to a pay scale higher than the Bill Clerks of other department. Since there was no recommendation of a replacement pay scale of the kind which would have accommodated the petitioner’s interest there is some - 2 - provision made in this regard, according to him, in resolution no. 660/F/2 issued by the Finance Department dated 8.2.1999 which is paragraph 21 of the said resolution. Let the petitioner take his chance with the State authorities a second time over if he is so convinced about the applicability of paragraph 21 in his case. So far as the present writ application is concerned, no order is required to be passed on what has been stated by way of relief. This writ application stands disposed of. AMIN (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)