HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR HGN'BLE SHRI R.N. CHANDRAKAR, JJ Writ Petition [Habeas Corpus) No. 7121" of 2009 Smt. Vetti Sukadi, W/o Shri Shyamlal, Aged about 22 years, R/o mm 1. Kumakolang, Nayapara, Thana Tongpal, Tehsi! Chindgarh, District South Bastar, Dantewada, CG. Smt. Laxmi Mandavi, W/o Shri Vaman Mandavi, Aged about 20 years, R/o Village Kumakolang, Nayapara, Thana Tongpal, Tehsil Chindgarh, District South Bastar, Dantewada, CG. 2. Versus Respondente 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Home, Ministry, DKS Bhawan Buildihg, Raipur CG. The Superintendent of Poiice, Dantewada, District South Bastar, Dantewada, CG. Station House Officer, Police Station Tongpal, District South Bastar, Dantewada, CG. Present: Shri Alok Dewangan, counsel for the petitioners. Shri UNS Deo, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 16th December, 2009) Per Dhirendra Mishra, J Heard. The petitioners have filed this petition for issuance of a writ of Habeas CorpL‘Is with the allegation that Shyamlal, husband of yup‘étitioner No.1 and Vaman Mandavi, husband of petitioner No.2, have been illegally detained by the respondent authorities. Sri UNS Deo, learned Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents, submits that the aforesaid persons were taken W l l l l h to police station for questioning. However, they were never‘detained and now, they are free citizen residing at their respective places. Learned counsei for the petitioners submits that the aforesaid persons were detained for a period of two months. However, he does not dispute that they are now free and residing at their respective places. In view of above submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nothing remains in this petition and the petition is, accordingly, disposed of ‘ i S saw i l ,ti ‘ .l l Visa/‘- . _ hireadra Mishra‘ ‘i (‘wrmwg‘g r 1, {2‘ y Jugge _ “J Judge y 1 ‘