$5‘Wé? Smgh IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 4%46 /2oo:é/( PETITIONER : Balbir Singh Shakya, aged 4O Years S/o Hiralal Shakya, Vaccinatgr, Vertnary Hospital, Ramanuj nagar, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS //l The State of Chhattisgarh Through Secratary Animal Husbandry Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) I The Director Veterinary Services, Raipur (C.G.) The Deputy Director Veterinary Services, Ambikapur (C.G.) 4. The State of M.P. / Through Secretary Animal Husbandry Department Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As stated above in the cause title. i :;‘ 2. /PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As stated above in the causetitle. XI-HC-22 Heard on LA. No.589/ 605 for‘amendment in pai'a‘ 5.5 of the I petition. 1t has been mentioned the application that due ta typographEca mistake instead of word ‘direct 294-2005 Qn a mention being mad :he case iS taken up for hearing. ShrS D. N, Prajapati, cou ei fat the petiticner. 8hri $anjay S. Agrawal, .A. for the State/respontjents No.1 ta 3. i l ’word ‘submitted ‘ was typed out. m the appimaiien, it is auowed. Learned counsei for t e petiioner is aHowed to carry gut the amendment during the course 'The petmoner has prefe ed thie writ petition being aggrieved by in- action on the pert 9f responden No2 and 3; The case ef the petitcner is inat in the year 1999 he was eiected on the pest cf Assistant Veterinary Field Officet and after setectic his appeintment was made and he aiee underwent 3 months’ training. Hcwever‘ that eeiection was ghaiienged and the same wee quashed ‘ y the State Adminetrative Ttibunai. After fotmation of the State of hattisgarh‘. now respondent No.1 has advertisett the vacancy for th poet of Aeeistent Veterinaty Fiete Gtfic-er. The petitioner made a reptes ntation claiming preferentéet treatment. Ae he was selected and training ‘ as received, therefore, he wee entitied for nreferentiai treatment, but t representatien of the petitioner has net been decided 5e far. Couneet for the petitio er submitted that the 9etitioner may be aiieweci to make a detaiied re resentation again to respondent No“: and Fer the reasons mentic e the day in the petiten iteetf. , d n ’ h n XLgc—zz he be directed ta decide the sa 'ne to which coimse‘ far respondent No.1 has no objection. ’ Having heard Iearned counsel for the petitoner and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitiener is allowed t0 nefore réspondent No} within a period of turn respondent No.1 wilt decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the representation make a detaiied repvesentation to days from today and in Consequentty, M.(W.)P. stand disposed of. after considering all the points raised by the petitioner in an objective mar ner in accordance with iaw. With the directian aforesa d; the petition stands diepesed of. No.5123f2004 and LA, No.9648/2004 aiso I Parties are entitied for certified cepy of this erderi W ,// sai- c. BHADOO L. hage