IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2941 of 2011 CHHABILA RAM & ANR Versus MAHESH BANSPHOR & ORS ----------- 4. 09.05.2011 Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners and perusing the order impugned, I do not find any good ground to interfere with the impugned order for the reason that the plaintiff’s survey which was mentioned in the plaint, has not been made as per statement made by the Survey Commissioner, admitting that survey was done on a different plot stated by survey commissioner in his cross-examination, though, he has mentioned the same plot in his report, which creates doubt on the survey report itself. Therefore, it is open for the petitioner to move a fresh application. Subject to the above observation, this petition is dismissed. Ravi/- ( Prakash Chandra Verma, j.)