IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 5955 of 2009 Deepak Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State Bank of Patiala and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Harsh Garg, Advocate for Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rishi, Advocate for Mr. G.S. Anand, Advocate for the respondents. RANJIT SINGH J. Principal liability has already been discharged. In regard to the interest, the matter is being settled under the OTS scheme. Counsel for the petitioner, however, says that the petitioner has already been informed that his case is not covered under the OTS. He, however, has been given a liberty to give proposal, which would be considered by the Bank. Let the petitioner give proposal, which shall be considered by the Bank in accordance with law. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. If the petitioner still left with any grievance, he may approach this Court. Till the time the Bank takes the final decision, further proceedings under the Act, would remain in abeyance. May 25, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE