IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32554 of 2009 SUNIL KUMAR . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 9.11.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the State. Petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Rampur P.S. case No. 79 of 2009 instituted for offences under Sections 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 27 of the Arms Act and ¾ of the Explosive Substance Act. In the First Information report, Sunil Kumar son of late Sukhdeo Yadav is not named as accused. One Pachkana Yadav son of Nageshwar Yadav is an accused and the police is in search of the petitioner for the reason that Pachkana Yadav’s name has been treated as alias name of the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner submits that his implication is false. Even Pachkana Yadav in the First Information Report is not alleged to have fired on the informant or caused any injury. He is alleged to have thrown bomb but there is no injury caused by explosive substance. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of Sunil Kumar son of late 2 Sukhdeo Yadav alias Pachkana Yadav is allowed. Let he surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Rampur P.S. case No. 79 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar