1 ba 980 of 2011 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.980 OF 2011 Mr. Kunal Arjun Parab .. Applicant. -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondents. Mr. Mr. L. B. Dixit i/b Mr. P. R. Pandey, for the applicant. Mrs. A. A. Mane, APP for the Respondent State. Mr. N. N. Gavankar, for the respondent Nos 2 to 5. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 16h September, 2011 P.C. 1. This is an application for cancellation of bail granted by the learned Magistrate on 3rd March, 2011 on 8.11.2010. Learned Magistrate had admitted the respondents to bail initially when the respondents were produced with the allegations for offence punishable under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code. Thereafter applicant- first informant moved this Court by filing Writ Petition No.3416 of 2010 and after observation of this Court, police sought to allege that the respondents committed offence punishable under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code. Therefore, by application dated 24th January, Senior Inspector, sought cancellation of bail granted to respondent. By order dated 3rd March,2011, learned Magistrate modified bail granted to the respondents by 2 ba 980 of 2011 seeking bonds for additional amounts. Learned Magistrate should not have made any observation about inability of the police officer to produce medical certificates earlier or about the faulty investigation. He could as well have cancelled the bail if the offence committed by accused was found to be more serious apart from the ground of breach of the conditions imposed. However, after such a long time cancellation of bail granted to respondent is thoroughly unwarranted as there are no allegations of breach of conditions. Therefore, the application is rejected. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)