C.R.No.3726 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.3726 of 2008 Date of Decision : 23.11.2009 Banwari Lal and another ...Petitioners Versus Gram Panchayat and others ...Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Mr. P.S.Jammu, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Kuldeep Khandelwal, Advocate, for respondent No.2. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The grievance of the petitioners is that the learned trial Court has directed the Gram Panchayat to take the proceedings for recovery of the possession from the plaintiff-petitioners, who were found in unauthorized possession over the public property. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that the Gram Panchayat cannot be directed to take proceedings for recovery of possession against the petitioners without complying with the procedure established by law, therefore, such a direction cannot be sustained. The petitioners are in unauthorized possession of the public property. The Panchayat has to take proceedings in accordance with law to seek eviction of the petitioners. Therefore, the direction issued by the learned trial Court and affirmed by the learned first Appellate Court cannot be said to be illegal or irregular, in any manner. In view thereof, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the order passed by the Courts below, which may warrant interference C.R.No.3726 of 2008 2 by this Court in the present revision petition. Dismissed. 23.11.2009 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE