IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.18715 of 2011 Date of decision : 4.10.2011 Raj Kanwar ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he would be satisfied if directions are given to the respondents to decide his representation/legal notice which he has served upon them. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that it would be just and appropriate if the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the legal notice served upon them by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible keeping in view the fact that the question involved is of sending the petitioner for a promotional course. Ordered accordingly. While deciding the representation, the respondents are expected to take into consideration all the relevant law, which is on the subject, including the one that the petitioner may cite before them. 4.10.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss