WPCRL No. 531 of 2010 With Stay Appl. No. 5374 / 10 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. L.K. Tiwari, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, present for the State. Heard. By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought quashing of the FIR / Crime No. 232 of 2010, relating to offences punishable under Section 363, 366-A, 376, 504, 506 of I.P.C., lodged at police station Rishikesh, District Dehradun. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that consented sexual intercourse does not constitute the rape. The allegation of the complainant is that the petitioner had promised her to get married. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the investigation. Therefore, without expressing any opinion as to the merits of the case, this writ petition is dismissed summarily with the observation that if the petitioner surrenders before the court concerned, his bail application shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay. (St ay Application No. 5374 of 2010 also stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 07.07.2010 HN