IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 9TH OCTOBER 2009 / 17TH ASWINA 1931 RP.No. 964 of 2009(B) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.19853/2009 Dated 15/07/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- P.DEVADASAN, S/O.VELAYUDHAN, POOVATTUMPARAMBATH HOUSE, P.O.MATTATHUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KURUNIYAN ANWAR, S/O.SAIDU, P.O.MATTATHUR, OTHUKKUNGAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. OTHUKKUNGAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, POST OTHUKKUNGAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SECRETARY, OTHUKKUNGAL GRAMA PANCHAYAT, POST OTHUKKUNGAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. R1 BY ADV.C.M.MOHAMMED IQBAL THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- R.P.No.964 OF 2009 IN W.P(C).No.19853 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of October, 2009 O R D E R Heard counsel for parties. The review petitioner is the third respondent in the writ petition. He states that he is aggrieved by the direction contained in the judgment sought to be reviewed. The direction was to the panchayat authorities to complete proceedings initiated on the allegation that a building was constructed in violation of the laws. It is true that the third respondent in the writ petition, who has filed this application for review, was not issued notice before the judgment was issued. His liberty to move for re-hearing was also preserved. The directions contained in the judgment sought to be reviewed were essentially to complete the proceedings. Yet, having regard to the materials placed on record in the review petition, the judgment sought to be reviewed is recalled and W.P(C).19853/09 RP.964/09 Page numbers shall stand listed by the force of this order for further consideration and the pleadings placed along with the review petition will be treated as counter affidavit to the writ petition for the purpose of hearing. The review petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.12/10.