^^: ''s^. ss^ ^ ^^•:'^. i; t-HC-22 3TI^I'?iT R-li* Sf^t '^li yfi'd + ~T»?•^l'Mld^, siTilti'ie. PiCTi'My sn^r i(3ra? ^...\pp..^a..^^ •f^^T" ^ HWVII fh*il<*> '^FI. 200^^ sn^rwaiw^ifei w PETITIONER Bhagalj Nath Kaxioje, aged about 43 years, S/o Piindu| Ram Kaaoje, at present working as a Asst. Teacher, Primary School Kolabal, Bikas Bakawaad, Distt. Bastar, ro village MohaU, Tahsil Jagadalpur, ;.B|astar(CG) Develo^nient C.G.,R| Distt.1 Versi RESPONDBNTS l. 2. 3, 4. 5. 6. State <^f Chhattisgarh, fhrough fhe Secretaiy, School|Edueation Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur|(CG) The Ipirector, Public Education, Raipur, Distt.R^ipur(CG) The Jagdal The Princip|al Develoi PmiciF|al Develo^ SB: HQN. SHRI DHIRENDRA 06.12.2008: Shri Vishnu Koshta, Adk Shri Artm Sao, Govt. Heard. This petition is du-ect( ,16.9.2005 Aimexure P-3, wh+ CM<tt<n<ftl T?1IR?f ^^^ <Fq'^.K ^? SlPdT 311^1 P. No.4975/2005 Bastar at CoBector qistrict Education Officer, |}ur, Distt. Bastar(CG) at Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (CG) Pnmary School, Kolawal, Block )iaent Bakawaad,Distt. Bastar (CG) Prunaiy School, Kapaaar, Block )m.ent Bastanar,Distt. Bastar (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLt; 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTIom OF mDIA MISHRA. J ocate, for the petitioner. for fhe State. Advocate :d agamst the order of transfer dated reby fhe petitioner has been transferred S!».. t>! m 1 s/£^ °Si'..Xl-HC-22 .-•?:"." sn^r^i feNsnSa ^W^ ^fl^tT ? 4 Tn[ •^IWM'M. ©Taiwre.RtWl^iy ^ ST^T 'q^T *IW<?IT arWcfi 'WI. 200 f^g' 311^1 ^^IIW^lf?^ 2- hto froiri Primaiy School, Kolaw^l, Kapanar, Block Bastanar. Leamed couitsel for th< order dated 7.10.2005 pass^d Annexure P-3 has not been Leamed counsel for fh^ order, fhe impugned order has beconie redundant and these circurastances, he has 3iberty to fhe State to pas(s transfer/postuig of the pe1 exigency. In view of the above sul tfae iastant petition is aUowei) set aside, However, th.e Stat{ order in the event of traasfer/postuig offhe petitiojaer. 'bllffl'il-t llldl' 4 fs^S <fa^l< ^T Slfigq 311^1 law^l, Block- Bakawaad to Pruaary School, petitioner submits fhat by virtue of stay by fhis Court, fhe impugned order of t?en effect to tffl date. State siibmits fhat ia view of the stay not been given efFect to aad fhe same ineaningless with the lapse of time. In jio objection if the petition is atlowed with appropriate orders in fhe luatter of tlitioner iu the event of admmistrative tiinissiou of leamed counsel for fiie State, aad impugned onler of Annexure P-3 is shaU be at liberty to pass appropriate adltunistrative exigency in the niatter of Sd/- / DhirendraMishra Judge [xit^ ^Hsi^ •