1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.505/2009 (Sanjay Shri Santoshkumar Patni .vrs. The State of Maharashtra and others) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr. S.V. Sirpurkar, Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. T.A. Mirza, APP for the respondents. .......... CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 22, 2010. Heard. Mr. Sirpurkar, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the documents relating to filing of the suit by Bagdiya against Smt. Indubai were not placed before investigating agency by the petitioner. He seeks leave to produce the said documents before the investigating agency. Mr. Sirpurkar further submits that after the production of the said documents before the investigating agency, investigating agency be directed to thereafter investigate the matter. Mr. Mirza, learned APP states that in case the petitioner chooses to place additional documents before the investigation officer, investigation officer shall investigate into the same and proceed in accordance with law. 2 In view of the statement made by Mr. Sirpurkar and Mr. Mirza, we do not deem it appropriate to proceed further in the matter. Needless to mention that all the contents raised in the petition are kept open and in event any decision is taken by the investigation officer adverse to the petitioner, he is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy as may be available in law. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande