IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18062 of 1999 R.SANTOSH, S/O P.V. RAMAKRISHNAN, R/O 76, JANAKPURI, VELACHERI ROAD, GUINDI, CHENNAI-32……………………………………...PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MR. TARIQUE HASSAN, S/O LATE S.M. SIDDIQUE, R/O 12, ASHIYANA ROAD, P.S. SHASHTRI NAGAR, TOWN & DIST- PATNA…………………………………………………..OPPSITE PARTIES. ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Adv. For the State:- Mrs.Veena Kri Jaiswal, APP For O.P. No.2:- Mr. Saurabh Kumar,Adv. ---------- 4. 28-Apr-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for complainant, O.P. No.2. 2. It has been shown from the complaint petition Annexure-1 that the dispute between the parties was only in respect of monetary transaction. It has been further shown that quashing applications filed by accused no.1, G.M. Pens Pvt. Ltd and accused no.5, Jaideep Chakrabarti and some other have already been allowed and the entire prosecution case against them have been quashed on the admission made by the complainant that parties have settled their dispute and he has received a draft of Rs.32,000/- in satisfaction of all his claims. 3. Considering the aforesaid facts and the stand - 2 - of the learned counsel for the complainant that he has no further grievance against the accused persons, the prayer made in this application is allowed and the order of cognizance dated 17.2.1999 passed by Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna in Complaint Case no. 1674 (c) of 1998 under Sections 406, 420 and 409 of the IPC as well as the entire criminal proceeding against the petitioner are hereby quashed. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh,J.)