IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2009 / 1ST ASWINA 1931 LA.App..No.683 of 2001(A) -------------------------- LAR.141/1995 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM .................... APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENT: --------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LATHA T. THANKAPPAN RESPONDENT(S)/CLAIMANT: -------------------------------- M.AHAMMED KANNU, PUNNOTTUTHEKKUMARA, PUTHENVEEDU, NEDUMANGADU. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ L. A. A. No.683 of 2001 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J Even though Smt.Latha T. Thankappan, the learned senior Government Pleader argued on the merits of the various grounds raised in this memorandum of appeal, we notice that it was relying on Ext.A1 judgment in L.A.R.139/95 that the learned Subordinate Judge granted enhancement. Ext.A1 was apparently a relevant judgment since the same pertains to the very same acquisition. Ext.A1 was in respect of the properties in category 2. What the learned Subordinate Judge did was to grant proportionate increase based on Ext.A1. It is fairly L. A. A. No.683 of 2001 -2- conceded by Smt.Latha T. Thankappan, the learned senior Government Pleader that Ext.A1 has become final. In view of the finality attained by Ext.A1, we do not find any reason for interfering with this appeal any longer. The appeal will stand dismissed. No costs. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE K. SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE kns/-