IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 9538 of 2003 BETWEEN: 1 The Convention of Baptist Churches of Nothern Circars, (Regd 16- 48/4, Rep. by its President Sri S.M. Kantha Raju S/o Mathyu Kakinada, R/o C.B.M. Compound, Visakhapatnam. 2 Pilli Paulus S/o Satyanandam, Ashok Nagar, Vijayawada-7. ... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Commissioner and Director School Education, A.P., Hyderabad. 2 The District Educational Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 3 State of A.P., Rep. by its Secretary to Government Education Department, Hyderabad. 4 Smt. K.Vijaya Kumari, Ramachandrapuram, East Godavari District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS DECLARING the action of the 1st Respondent in issuing impugned order in R.C.No. 1281/D1-1/2003, dated 18- 04-2003 as being violative of Sec. 42 to 46 of A.P. Education Act, 1982 and Judgment in W.A.No.1814 of 2002 reported in 2003 (2) ALT 261 (DB) and consequently set aside the impugned order in R.C.No. 1281/D1/1/2003, dated 18-04-2003 and in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.B.SUDHAKAR REDDY & NEERAJA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER: None appears for the petitioners. 2. The impugned proceedings of the Commissioner and Director of School Education is only a request to the petitioners to set right all the problems within 15 days failing which necessary action will be taken to stop the grant-in-aid for the school, if the harassment and inconvenience put to Smt. G.N. Amrutavalli is not discontinued. As the impugned proceedings being in the nature of a show cause notice and as none appears for the petitioners, I am of the opinion that no orders required to be passed in the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J July 22, 2008 DSK