IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4600 of 1998 1. Pramod Kumar Singh , S/o Shri Mahendra Prasad Singh, village- Shukhalia, P.O. + P.S.- Dorpa, Via- Goradanoee, District- East Champaran. 2. Prabhunath Singh, S/O Sri Yugal Singh, Village- Raghopur, P.O.- Gangapipar, P.S. Chiraya, Via- Dhaka, District- East Champaran................................................................. Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Secretary-cum- Commissioner, Primary and Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The Director, Primary Education, New Secretariat, Patna. 4. The Bihar Public Service Commission through its Chairman.....................................................................Respondents ----------- For the petitioners :- Mr. Rajendra Pd. Singh, Sr. Advocate For the State :- Mr. Manoj Kr. Sinha, A.C. to G.A. 10 For the Bihar Public Service Commission - Mr. Kaushal Kr. Jha,Advocate ------------ 12 15-7-2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners main grievance is non- implementation of a policy decision contained in a letter dated 29-11-1980 contained in annexure-1. That letter relates to appointment of physical trained teachers. Petitioners have also claimed to be persons who had received physical teachers training. The grievance of the petitioners is that in spite of some stipulation in paragraph-1 of the letter dated 29- 11-1980 ( Annexure-1) for reserving in the year 1980-81, 20 percent of the newly created posts of teachers in Middle Schools and 10 percent of posts which may be subsequently created in the later year for appointment of physical trained 2 teachers no steps have been taken in the light of such policy decision. The grievance is based upon an advertisement issued for appointment of such teachers in the year 1990-91 and in the year 1996 which do not contain any provision for such reservation. It is not in dispute that matter relating to recruitment of teachers in Middle Schools including those of physical trained teachers and issue relating to requirement of training are being monitored by the Apex Court on account of several matters having been taken from Bihar to the Apex Court. The parties agree that the decision of the Apex Court will guide the State Government in framing appropriate policy. In view of aforesaid agreement between the parties, this writ petition is finally disposed of with liberty to the petitioners that if so advised, they may raise this issue also before the Apex Court, in accordance with law. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) ( Shivaji Pandey,J)