IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE 0NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 6749 of 2008 Between: Ibrahim Ali Junaid @ Fiaz Ali R/o. H.No.18-1-350/11/36/A, Gulshan Iqbal colony, Chandrayangutta, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Nizamia Tibbi College, Charminar, Hyderabad rep. by its Principal 2 N.T.R. University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, rep. by its Registrar. 3 Vice-Chancelor, N.T.R. University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the inaction of the respondents in not taking a decision on the representation dated 06.02.2008 submitted by the petitioner to permit him to re-join the B.U.M.S. course by condoning his absence for more than 91 days, is arbitrary and unlawful and further direct them to take action forthwith, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.BALAGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.D.V.NAGARJUNA BABU The Court made the following : ORDER: It is represented that the respondent-University has already accorded the necessary permission to the writ petitioner to re-join B.U.M.S final year course. Therefore, the cause in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J Date: 01.04.2008 cvm