1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. APPLICATION NO. 120 OF 2009 IN CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 242 OF 2009 Ashok Ukaram Bodha ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Dnyaneshwar Deshmukh for the Applicant Mrs. P.H. Kantharia, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: SEPTEMBER 17, 2009 P.C.:- This Court passed an order on 16th February, 2009, disposing of the petition, and observed: “...the grievance of the petitioner would be considered by the competent authority and appropriate directions as per the need and facts and circumstances and the position of law would be passed..” 2. It appears that this is an ongoing process, and the applicant wants direction against unauthorised cable connections. 2 3. An affidavit has been filed in which it is stated that as many as 17163 cable connections have been detected. 4. This is an ongoing process, and it appears that the respondents are doing their job, but the applicant, by this application, wants that this Court should assist him in running his business. We cannot do that. 5. This application is misconceived, and is dismissed. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J.