..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.743 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2622 OF 2008 Nafeesa Paltu Khan. ..Applicant. Versus Ms.Afreen Maqbool Siddiqui and 3 others. ..Respondents. ... Mr.R.G.Merchant, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.D.P. Adsule, A.P.P., for the State. ... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 3RD MARCH, 2009. DATED : 3RD MARCH, 2009. DATED : 3RD MARCH, 2009. [IN CHAMBER, 2:40 PM] P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant - orig. complainant and the learned APP for the State. 2. By order dated 27th August, 2008 passed in Criminal Application No.2622 of 2008, the applicants therein i.e. original accused Nos.2 & 3 came to be granted anticipatory bail in FIR No.175 of 2008 of Versova police station. Both the applicants are ladies. ..(2).. 3. The applicant has preferred this application for modification of the said order. The modification sought is that this order shall remain in force only till filing of the charge-sheet and thereafter these two accused be directed to surrender before the appropriate Court and apply for regular bail. 4. The learned APP states that after passing the order now the Court cannot make any changes therein and the only remedy to the applicant is to approach the Supreme Court. The learned APP, on instructions from Investigating Officer Mr.S.A.Patel, further stated that in the course of the investigation after the date of the order, no further material has been revealed as far as these two accused persons are concerned. 5. It may be stated here that at the time when the order granting anticipatory bail was passed, no prayer was made on behalf of the applicant - orig.complainant or the learned APP that the order should be limited in duration. The order was also ..(3).. not challenged before the Supreme Court. Now this application has been preferred more than six months after the order has been passed. In view of all the above facts, in my opinion, the modification as sought for by the applicant, cannot be granted at this stage. 6. Criminal Application is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)