IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 17875 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION: November 6, 2008 Smt. Lila Wati …Petitioner Versus Union Territory, Chandigarh and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: Mr. K.S. Mangat, Advocate, for Mr. G.S. Ghuman, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. The petitioner was asked to place on record prima facie evidence that she was running a business on the site No. 132, Sector 22-D, Chandigarh. The matter has been adjourned twice. Again a request for adjournment has been made. We reject the request for adjournment with the observation that the petitioner may file a fresh petition on the same cause of action by placing all necessary documents on record. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (JORA SINGH) November 6, 2008 JUDGE Pkapoor