IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6890 of 2007 DR.SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH, SON OF SRI RAM KRIT SINGH, A RESIDENT OF VILLAGE & P.O. MASARHI, P.S. GOURICHAK, DISTRICT PATNA AT PRESENT WORKING AS LECTURER IN THE DEPARTMENT OF MAGAHI OF B.D. EVENING COLLEGE, MITHAPUR, P.S. GARDANIBAGH IN THE TOWN AND DISTRICT OF PATNA…………….PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE MAGADH UNIVERSITY, BODH-GAYA, DISTRICT GAYA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR HAVING OFFICE AT, P.O. & P.S. BODH-GAYA, DISTRICT GAYA 3. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, MAGADH UNIVERSITY, AT, P.O., P.S., BODH-GAYA, DISTRICT GAYA 4. THE PRINCIPAL, B.D. EVENING COLLEGE, MITHAPUR, PATNA………….RESPONDENTS ----------- 3. 08.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and also learned counsel for the Magadh University. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a teacher in B.D. Evening College, Mithapur, Patna under the jurisdiction of the Magadh University. His case was considered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6098 of 1997 popularly known as “Agrawal Commission Case” and he was placed in the category of R/1 i.e. Agrawal Commission found that the post on which petitioner was appointed, was recommended to the State Government before - 2 - the cut-off date. Petitioner has since continued to work on the same. Therefore, in view of the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, his case has to be considered by the University for absorption from the date of his appointment. Learned counsel for the University does not dispute this factual position. He submits that in case petitioner is found to be placed in R/1 category on the basis of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, his case will be considered by the University and appropriate orders shall be passed in accordance with law. Therefore, this writ application is disposed of with direction to the authorities of the Magadh University to consider the case of the petitioner, in the light of the judgment of the Supreme Court and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of three months. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. B.T (J. N. Singh, J.)