1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3189 OF 2010 ( The Amravati People’s Co-op. Bank Ltd. vs. Kamalkishor K. Upadhye) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr.A.V.Khare, Adv. for petitioner. Respondent in person. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : AUGUST 09, 2010. Heard Mr.A.V.Khare, Adv. for the petitioner and the respondent/party-in- person. Perused the statement of accounts at page no.83 and 84. Prima facie, it appears that the respondent was given credit by exercising lean over his account of Rs.1,44,982/-. However, immediately thereafter, there is reverse entry taken and thus, the original balance of Rs.4,47,132 has been restored. In view of this position, at this stage, I am not inclined to interfere in exercise of discretion by the DRTA. The impugned order also demonstrates that, because of failure of respondent to explain entries in the statement of accounts, the order came to be passed. The DRTA has fixed the matter for admission on 17.8.2010. The petitioner can attempt to clarify the position on that day. The DRTA can definitely look into the correct position appearing in the accounts and pass appropriate order. With liberty to the petitioner to approach again thereafter if the contingency arises, in the circumstances, present petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE jais