THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.28102 OF 2011 ORDER The petitioner was terminated from the service of the 1st respondent-Society through order dated 15-4-2006. He preferred an appeal before the 3rd respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is that though the appeal is filed in the year 2008, it has not been disposed of so far. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Cooperation for the respondents. The petitioner availed the remedy of appeal before the 3rd respondent. It took nearly three years for the 1st respondent itself to communicate the order of removal. The 3rd respondent ought to have taken up the appeal since the petitioner is out of the service. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to pass orders in the appeal preferred by the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dated: 14-10-2011 rkk