IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2014 of 2008 Mussoorie Dehradun Development Authority, through its Secretary, 12, Pritam Road, Dehradun. … Petitioner. Versus Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Vyomprasth, Kanwali, GMS Road, Dehradun. … Respondent. Mr. Rahul Consul, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Anjali Bhargava, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent. Date January 06, 2011. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing show cause notice/order dated 30-6-2008 (as contained in Annexure-1 to the petition) passed by the respondent, whereby a show cause has been issued against the petitioner. Since the writ petition has been filed against a show cause notice and no final order has been passed by the respondent – authority. The respondent-authority has jurisdiction to proceed with the matter. However, the petitioner, instead of filing objection against the show cause notice, has preferred this writ petition. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner may raise all the grounds in its objection before the respondent, which have been raised in the writ petition. The respondent, after considering the objection of the petitioner, shall pass a reasoned and speaking order and proceed in accordance with law. If the petitioner files objection before the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner concerned within a period 2 of ten days from today, the interim order dated 15-12-2008 granted by this Court shall continue till the decision is taken by the respondent, after considering the objection of the petitioner- MDDA. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. A certified copy of this order be issued to the learned counsel for the petitioner by tomorrow (7-1-2011) on payment of usual charges. (B.S.Verma, J.) RCP