IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 1ST NOVEMBER 2010 / 10TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 32511 of 2010(L) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- KOCHUTHRESIA, D/O. VARHGESE, KUNNEL HOUSE, THIRUVAMPADY.P.O. VADACKAL, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.B.PRAMOD. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-01 2. THE KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, KAU .P.O., THRISSUR, KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PIN-680 656. 3. COLLEGE OF FISHERIES, N.H.BYE-PASS ROAD, PANANGADU.P.O., ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, PIN-682 506. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN, R2 BY SRI. K.P. MUJEEB, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/11/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 32511 of 2010 L ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 1st day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner claims admission to the course, Bachelor of Fisheries Science, for which six seats were reserved for the children of fishermen. According to the petitioner, although she is eligible in all respects, admission was denied on the ground that the petitioner did not produce certificates which were prescribed in the prospectus. Case of the petitioner is that eventhough one of the certificates was not produced, the information, which has to be furnished through the certificate, was already furnished in the other documents produced by the petitioner and, therefore, she ought not have been denied admission. 2. Learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submit that the allotment by the Entrance Commissioner is over as early as on 17-10-2010. It is also submitted that in so far as the remaining vacancies are concerned, the Entrance W.P.(C) No.32511/10 : 2 : Commissioner has recommended to Government to permit spot admission. 3. If as stated by the learned Government Pleader, allotment is over on 17-10-2010, this Court will not be justified in directing the Entrance Commissioner to consider the claim of the petitioner, even if there is substance in the grievance now raised. Therefore, there cannot be any direction to the first respondent. 4. Be that as it may, counsel for the petitioner submits that three seats are still vacant and that respondents 2 and 3 are to fill up those seats. If, as stated, there are vacancies and if the petitioner satisfies the eligibility laid down, it is for the petitioner to approach respondents 2 and 3, in which event, her claim will be considered in accordance with the eligibility laid down. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks