IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18018 of 2010 SINDHU DEVI WIFE OF LATE SHEO PUJAN PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SAHTHA LALA TOLA P.S. SAHTHA IN THE DISTRICT OF VAISHALI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, AURANGABAD 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTRMNET, AURANGABAD 4. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 2 02.11.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to revision of family pension which has not been done despite representation as contained in Annexure-2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State as also the Accountant General submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.4 with copy to the respondent no.3. In view of the above, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the - 2 - relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of six weeks on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled without delay and the petitioner may start getting the revised family pension. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)