IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 10242 of 2003 Between: R.Yadi Reddy S/o Late Malla Reddy R/o 6-3-102, Shivrampalli,R.R.Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police Cyberabad Lakdikapool, Hyderabad, R.R.Dist. 2 The Asst. Commissioner of Police Rajendranagar, R.R.Dist. 3 The State House Officer P.S.Pahadi Sharif, R.R.Dist. 4 Om Prakash S/o Lal Ram R/o 7-2-1087/1/3, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad. 5 Smt. Nirmala W/o Sri. Nanu Ram R/o 7-2-1087/1/3, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad. 6 Vijaya Sharma S/o Not Known to the petitioner herein R/o M/s. Abhishek & Paper Works, Jalpally Village, Saroornagar Mandal, R.R.Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to pass an order or direction one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to abstain & refrain harassing the petitioner by way of calling him to the Police Station regularly in the name of enquiry pertains to the petitioner said registered land and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.BRAHMADANDI RAMESH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner seeks to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 – police officials restraining them from harassing him by way of calling to the police station regularly in the name of enquiry with regard to the civil disputes. It is stated that one Tej Ram filed a complaint on 02.09.2002 against the petitioner and one Sadanand alleging that they trespassed into his house bearing Nos.7-57/1 and 2 situated at Jalpally village which is standing in the name of 5th respondent herein, threatened them and demolished their houses causing loss of Rs.1,50,000/- and basing on the said complaint, the police registered a case in Crime No.152 of 2002 for the offences under Sections 447 and 427 IPC on the same day against the petitioner and one Sadanand and the police took up investigation. It is stated by the respondents 1 to 3 that there was no harassment as alleged by the petitioner. In view of the pendency of case against the petitioner, the petitioner is not entitled for any relief sought for in the writ petition and hence, the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:02.04.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RAGHU}