IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. RFA No.658 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.10.2011 Bhupinder Singh & another -----Appellants Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh -----Respondent & other connected cases being RFA No.659 of 2011 (O&M) Mukesh Kumar -----Appellant Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh -----Respondent RFA No.660 of 2011 (O&M) Sat Paul Goyal -----Appellant Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh -----Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present:- Mr. P.C. Dhiman, Advocate for the appellants. Ms. Lisa Gill, Advocate for the respondent/UT. --- RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J. This judgment shall dispose of three appeals i.e. RFA Nos.658 to 660 of 2011, as the same have arisen out of one common award of the reference Court dated 3.9.2011 passed in RFA No.658 of 2011 similar reference applications arising out of same acquisition proceedings. In these appeals, the claimants are seeking enhancement of compensation for super-structures which were on their acquired land. Counsel for the appellant has fairly stated that similar appeals arising out of same acquisition with regard to enhancement of compensation have already been dismissed vide judgment dated 17.11.2009 passed in RFA No.1208 of 2009 (Union Territory, Chandigarh Vs. Jarnail Singh) and these appeals are also liable to be dismissed in view of the aforesaid judgment. Ordered accordingly. There is delay in filing of these appeals. Since these appeals have been dismissed on merit, question of condonation of delay does not survive at all. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of each connected case. October 12, 2011 ( RAKESH KUMAR GARG ) ak JUDGE 2