- 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS No. 1165 OF 1995 IN SUIT No. 2600 OF 1994 Chandrakant Prabhudas Jerajani ... Plaintiff Vs. Mohan Builders & Ors. ... Defendants *** Mr. Baptist D’Souza with Mr. A. J. Dubey i/b. M/s. S. Ashwinikumar, for the Plaintiff. Mr. G. J. Kubal i/b S. G. Deshmukh, for the Defendants. *** CORAM : V. M. KANADE, J. DATE : AUGUST 31, 2009. PC :- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff. This Chamber Summons is taken out for amendment of the plaint, as per the Schedule, annexed to the Chamber Summons. It is stated that in paragraph 16 after the word “agents” the word “Members” should be added and after the word “Officers”, the words “any person claiming through them” may be added, and further in the same paragraph after the words “immovable properties” the words “together with flats/structures standing thereon” may be added. Consequently, it is prayed that in the prayer clause consequential amendment may be permitted. - 2 - 2. In my view, no prejudice would be caused to the defendants if such an application for amendment is granted when the plaintiff wants to add certain words, the words which are already pleaded by the plaintiff in paragraph 16 and for consequential prayer clause. Chamber Summons is therefore, allowed in terms of prayer Clause (a). The delay caused in taking out the Chamber Summons is condoned. Amendment to be carried out within 4 weeks. Chamber Summons is therefore, disposed of in above terms. 3. The defendants are at liberty to file additional written- statement in view of the amendment in the plaint. Sd/- [ V. M. KANADE, J.]