1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 61 of 2011 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO. 7028 of 2011 with CIVIL APPLICATION NO.62 OF 2011 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO.7028 OF 2011 WRIT PETITION NO. Nisha Tejinder Singh .. Applicant Versus Tejinder Singh Mehta ...Respondent Mr. Sandesh Patil a/w. S.R.Saudagar for applicant. None for Respondent CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR & R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED:- 27th JUNE, 2011. P.C. 1. None appears for the respondent. Office remark indicates that respondent has been duly served. Notably, on 16th June, 2011 one Mr. Rajesh Mishra appeared and informed the Court that although he acted as Power of Attorney of the respondent before the Family Court, he was no more interested in espousing the cause of the 2 respondent. As a result, hearing of the petition was deferred to enable him to inform the respondent, if he so wanted. 2. As aforesaid, none appears for the respondent. The delay in filing appeal is only of 19 days. For the reasons mentioned in the application being sufficient cause, in the interest of justice, application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 3. First Appeal be registered and listed for admission as per its turn. (R.Y.GANOO, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)