Civil Revision No.1092 of 2011(O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Civil Revision No.1092 of 2011(O&M) Decided on : February 16, 2011 Ashok Malik ... Petitioner VERSUS Kalpana ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Vivek Khatri, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N.JINDAL, J.- The respondent wife has already been examined and cross- examined by the petitioner husband. However, by way of the instant application, the petitioner wants to recall the respondent for cross- examination on following two questions, on the ground that these questions were left due to inadvertence:- “(a) Whether from the year 2002 i.e. the year of her marriage till she left the house of the respondent in the year 2006, she was having sexual relationship with the respondent. (b) Whether photographs Ex.R-4 to R-21 were snapped in the year 2005-2006 when the petitioner and the respondent were on pleasure trip to Rajasthan i.e. Udeypur, Mount Abu and Pushkar City.” Civil Revision No.1092 of 2011(O&M) [ 2 ] The two questions, quoted above, were already in the knowledge of the petitioner and could be put at the time of her cross- examination. The application appears to be nothing, but a dilatory tactic being adopted by the petitioner to prolong the adjudication of the matter. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. February 16, 2011 ( A.N.JINDAL ) `gian' JUDGE