IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 29TH JULY 2011 / 7TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 20689 of 2011(I) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- ANILKUMAR SHARMA, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.O.P.SHARMA, C.C. 12/323, COCHIN COLLEGE ROAD, MATTANCHERRY VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, KOCHI - 682 002. BY ADV. SRI.SAIBY JOSE KIDANGOOR RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.PIN-695 001 2. THE TALUK SURVEYOR, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM.PIN-682 516 3. SARVOTHAMAN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O.KRISHNANKUTTY, BLAYITHARA HOUSE, KUNDANNUR JUNCTION, MARADU P.O., ERNAKULAM.682 506 R1 & R2 BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.20689/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.S.NO.1416/08 DATED 31/1/2011 BEFORE THE HON'BLE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM. P2 COPY OF THE SKETCH PREFERRED BY THE TALUK SURVEYOR DATED 9/7/2010. P3 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 10/6/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 20689 OF 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 29th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner approaches this Court with the following prayers: i. Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ or direction directing the 2nd respondent to measure the land of the petitioner in the light of Ext.P1 judgment. ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or direction directing the 2nd respondent to act upon Ext.P3 representation in accordance with law. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to Ext.P1 judgment the petitioner submitted Ext.P3 representation before the 2nd respondent. The learned counsel also submits that the matter has become final by virtue of Ext.P1 judgment passed by the Civil Court. 3. Heard learned Govt. Pleader appearing for respondents 1 and 2. This Court does not find it necessary to issue notice to the 3rd respondent for the time being, in view of the limited nature of the relief proposed to be given. WPC.No.20689 of 2011 : 2 : In the result, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P3 representation submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as to the 3rd respondent as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within 2 months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 2nd respondent for further steps. (P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE) kp