1 23 S.B.CRIMINAL MISC.SECOND BAIL APPLICATION NO.6572/2009 Kalu Ram Vs. The State of Rajasthan DATE OF ORDER : 17th December 2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr.Vineet Jain,for the petitioner. Mr.O.P.Singaria,Public Prosecutor for State. .... BY THE COURT The petitioner has moved this second application for bail after filing of the charge-sheet in the matter wherein he is accused of offences under Sections 366, 376, 342, 120B IPC. The first bail application as moved by the petitioner, though was filed on 14.05.2009 but when came up for consideration on 28.07.2009, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that as per his instructions charge-sheet had been filed in the matter; and this Court, while observing that the earlier bail application was dismissed by the learned Sessions Judge during the investigation, proceeded to dispose of the said first bail application with liberty to the petitioner to move for bail afresh before the Sessions Judge. The next bail application as moved by the petitioner was rejected by the learned Sessions Judge on 21.08.2009; and, with reference to the said order, the present bail application has been filed on 15.12.2009. 2 Upon the Court's query on the stage of the proceedings, the learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that the matter is fixed for prosecution evidence on 23.01.2010. Looking to the nature of accusations and the totality of the circumstances, though this Court is not inclined to extend indulgence to the petitioner at this stage, and more particularly until the prosecutrix is examined in the trial; but then, it does appear appropriate to observe that if the petitioner makes a request to the learned Trial Court for expeditious proceedings and for examination of the prosecutrix at the first, the same be given due consideration. With the observations aforesaid, this second application for bail moved on behalf of the petitioner Kalu Ram s/o Kanaram under Section 439 Cr.P.C. sands rejected at this stage. (DINESH MAHESHWARI),J. s.soni