1 D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL(W)NO.400/2008 M/s. Raj. Co-operative Dairy Federation Ltd., Hanumangarh Junction Vs. The Judge, Industrial Tribunal & Labour Court, Bikaner. Date of Judgment :: 04-07-2008 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. NARAYAN ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHUVENDRA S. RATHORE Mr. B.C. Mehta, for the appellant. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. The matter pertains to termination of services of Roshan Lal, employee of the appellant. An industrial dispute however was referred in terms of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act before the Labour Tribunal in the following terms: “Whether the termination of workman, Shri Roshan Lal son of Shri Heeralal, resident of village and post Banwali, Tehsil Sadulsahar, District Sriganganagar, from service, by the Manager, Rajasthan Cooperative Dairy Federation Ltd., Hanumangarh, District Srigangangar, is justified and legal? If not, then for what relief the workman is entitled?” The Tribunal on basis of pleadings of the parties and the evidence led held that the termination of services of the employee was in contravention of the provisions of Section 25 F and 25 G of the Act of 1947 and accordingly directed for payment of compensation in lieu of reinstatement. The management and also the workman approached this Court in writ applications which were heard together and were dismissed by the impugned order. 2 The learned Single Judge of this Court affirmed the findings recorded by the Tribunal and held that retrenchment of the concerned workman was in violation of the provisions of Section 25 F and 25 G of the Act of 1947. The award passed by the Tribunal in this view of the matter was not interfered with. In view of the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the Industrial Tribunal and also by the learned Single Judge of this Court, in our view, no interference would be required. More so, it is not a case where directions were issued for reinstatement; rather in lieu of reinstatement, a lump sum has been directed to be paid by way of compensation. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case therefore, we do not find any infirmity either in the order of the learned Tribunal or in the order of learned Single Judge. This appeal accordingly is dismissed. [RAGHUVENDRA S.RATHORE],J. [NARAYAN ROY],CJ. Praveen