IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 5292 of 2010. Decided on: 29.06.2010. __________________________________________________________ Smt. Radha Devi. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Harish Dod, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. B.S. Ranjan, Advocate for respondent No.4. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No.4 to the post of Anganwari Worker in Anganwari Centre, Palu, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Sirmaur. Respondents No.1 to 3 have filed reply. The proceedings of the selection process are marked as Annexure R-1/A. Respondent No.4 was placed at Sr. No.1 since she has secured 9 marks. One Smt. Mamta Sharma has been placed at Sr. No.2 and the petitioner is at Sr. No.3 (Waiting list). Mr. Harish Dod, learned counsel for the petitioner states that respondent No.4 has left the job and the respondents/State be directed to offer appointment to his client. This 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - cannot be allowed. However, in the interest of justice, respondents are directed to make appointments to the post of Anganwari Worker at Anganwari Centre, Palu as per selection process reflected in Annexure R-1/A strictly according to the merit and availability of vacancies. 2. In view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. June 29, 2010. (sck).