1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 6181 OF 2006 (Mangala Vikas Muley .v. State of Maharashtra and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri B.G. Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.D. Kothari, AGP for the respondent No.1. Shri V.D. Raut, Advocate for the respondent Nos.2, 3 and 5. Shri M.B. Naidu, Advocate for the respondent No.4. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA AND C.L. PANGARKAR, JJ. 21ST JULY, 2008 The petitioner having been aggrieved by the appointment of the respondent No.4 as Anganwadi Sevika, has challenged the impugned selection and appointment of respondent No.4. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner makes a statement that in identically placed matter, this Court, has passed the order dated 18th October, 2007 in Writ Petition No. 1617/2007, which reads as under :- “By this petition, the petitioner challenges the appointment of respondent No.4 as Anganwadi Sewika. Mr. Kapgate, learned Counsel for Zilla Parishad invites our attention to circular dated 7th September, 2002 which authorises Commissioner, 2 Integrated Child Development Services Scheme Maharashtra State at Mumbai jurisdiction to decide the dispute, inter alia, concerning illegal appointments of Anganwadi Sewika. In view of the said Circular, Mr. Kulkarni, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to the petitioner to make representation through Chief Executive Officer to the Commissioner within a period of two weeks. In case such representation is made, the Chief Executive Officer shall forward the same to the Commissioner, Bombay within two weeks of the receipt thereof and the Commissioner shall decide the representation within a period of six weeks thereafter. In case, the order passed by the Commissioner is adverse to the petitioner, liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court. Writ Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs.” In view of above, this Writ Petition is also disposed of in terms of aforesaid order dated 18th October, 2007. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.