BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty First day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16971 of 2011 1. MUTHAMMAL 2. MUTHULAKSHMI 3. BOMMIAMMAL 4. SELVI 5. DHANDAPANI 6. VELNAICKER 7. SUBAMANI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Nos.1,2,5,6,7,9 & 10 Vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE DINDIGUL TOWN WEST POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DIST, CR. NO. 1154/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.VEILKANI RAJU Advocate For Respondent : MR.T.MOHAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 307, 498(A) and 506(i) I.P.C. in Crime No.1154 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been arrayed as A1, A2, A5 to A7, A9 and A10 and they have been falsely implicated in this case. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that this is a case of matrimonial dispute and the petitioners are the in-laws of the de-facto complainant and there is no specific allegation levelled against them. 3. Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that this is a case of matrimonial dispute and the petitioners are the in-laws of the de-facto complainant. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case and also considering the fact that this is a case of matrimonial dispute and the petitioners are the in-laws of the de-facto complainant, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dindigul, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) each with one surety for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Judicial Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 21/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, DINDIGUL 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL 3. INSPECTOR OF POLICE DINDIGUL TOWN WEST POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. M.VEILKANI RAJU Advocate SR.No.45110 GH : 23.12.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16971 of 2011 Date :21/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/