1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1650 OF 2007 M/s.Shaikh Gulam and Kalim Bhai Co. @ Shaikh Gulam Hussain Petitioner versus M/s.Nilkamal Crates and Bins & another Respondents Mr.R.B.Paranjape a/w Kamlesh Hadkar for petitioner. Mr.Santosh K. Yadigudri for respondent. D.A.Nalawade for respondent no.2. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 09th June 2009 PC : 1. The learned counsel appearing for the first respondent states that the evidence of the witness of the first respondent has been already recorded and the said witness is being cross examined by the advocate for the petitioner. He has produced for perusal of this Court letter dated 19th May 2009 sent to him by the first respondent recording the aforesaid facts. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner disputes the said factual statement. 2. However, the learned counsel for the first respondent is making 2 this statement on the basis of written instructions received from his client and therefore the said statement will have to be accepted. 3. The challenge in this petition is to an order issuing process. As the trial has already started, no interference can be made at this stage. Therefore, the writ petition is not entertained and the same is rejected by keeping all contentions raised by the petitioner expressly open. The petitioner can raise all the contentions at the time of trial. (A.S.OKA, J.)