IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2011/16TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WPC.No. 32378 of 2011 (V) PETITIONER: P.J.MINI, WIFE OF DR.SHIBU EAPEN, AGED 41 YEARS, STAFF NURSE GRADE. I, MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED. RESPONDENTS: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2 THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 035. 3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, ALAPPUZHA-688 001. R1 TO R3 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. E.M. ABDUL KHADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-12-2011 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).NO.32378/2011-V: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.A5.8681/03/DMOHA OF THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA DTD. 21/08/2003. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE G.O.(RT).NO.351/2009/H&FWD OF THE GOVERNMENT DTD. 05/02/2009. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.A2/1098/09/MCHA OF THE ADDL. SUPDT. DTD. 16/05/2009. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE LETTER NO.EE2/38607/2010/DHS OF THE R.2. DTD. 15/07/2010. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE PROFORMA DTD. NIL. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE SERVICE CERTIFICATE DTD. 27/09/2011. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.EE2-38607/10/H&FWD OF THE R.2. DTD. 17/09/2011. EXT.P.8: COPY OF THE PROVISIONAL SENIORITY STATEMENT OF NURSING TUTORS DTD. NIL. EXT.P.9: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE R.2. DTD. 28/11/2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Prv. K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------------ W.P(C) NO: 32378 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th December, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner who is working as a Staff Nurse Gr.I at the Medical College Hospital, Alappuzha has filed this writ petition complaining that she has not been included in the provisional seniority list of Nursing Tutors, Ext.P8. It is the case of the petitioner that she is fully qualified for being included in Ext.P8 list. However, for reasons not known to her, she has been excluded from Ext.P8 list. The petitioner has immediately submitted Ext.P9 objections to the provisional list to the second respondent. However, no orders have been passed thereon till date. The petitioner therefore seeks the issue of appropriate directions for the consideration and disposal of Ext.P9. 2. I have heard the learned Govt. Pleader also. In view of the limited relief that is claimed I am of opinion that this writ petition can be disposed of directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P9. 3. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the second respondent to consider the grievances of the petitioner set WPC 32378/2011 2 out in her objections evidenced herein by Ext.P9, in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after issuing notice to and hearing the petitioner also. Sd/- K. SURENDRA MOHAN Judge jj P.S.to Judge WPC 32378/2011 3