IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.8354 of 1989 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.09.2011 Sh. Vidya Dhar Excise & Taxation Officer, Panchkula and others ... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana through Secretary Excise and Taxation Department, Haryana Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:None for the petitioners. Mr. O.P. Sharma, Addl. AG, Haryana. ***** 1.Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? NO 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? NO K. KANNAN, J. (Oral) 1 The writ petition challenges the seniority list prepared in the office of the Excise and Taxation Department. The petitioners have also sought for stay of promotion made on the basis of the said seniority list. The Bench of this Court rejected the plea by the interim order dated 13.09.1989. 2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners to substantiate the claims made in the writ petition. The Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for default of non- appearance of the petitioners. SEPTEMBER 27, 2011 ( K. KANNAN ) Rajan JUDGE