IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 5TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 14TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 24055 of 2011(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SHIBU K.B, ENGINEER, (THERMAL-MECHANICAL) GR.I,.SL FERTILISERS AND CHEMICAL TRAVANCORE LTD UDYOGAMANDAL, ERNAKULAM 683 501 RESIDING AT BI FLAT NO.9, FACT TOWNSHIP, UDYOGAMANDAL ERNAKULAM 683 501. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN SRI.C.ANIL KUMAR RESPONDENT: --------------- FERTILISERS AND CHEMICALS TRVANCORE LTD. UDYOGAMANDAL, ERNAKULAM 683 501 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR. ADV.SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 24055 of 2011(F) APPENDIX --------------- PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ----------------------------------- P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT LETTER NO.CPRM.PD.PER.299 DATED 20.1.1992 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. P2: TRUE COPY OF THE CONFIRMATION ORDER NO.CPRM-PD-PER-1101 DATED 6.5.1993 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 30.11.2001 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE C.M.(PER) OF THE RESPONDENT. P4: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 25.2.2010 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE C.M(HR) OF THE RESPONDENT. P5: TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 17.3.2010 OF THE RESPONDENT. P6: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 12.5.2010 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE G.M.(HR) OF THE RESPONDENT. P7: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 18.9.2010 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL RKC //True Copy// PA to Judge. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.24055 of 2011-F. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 5th September, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is presently working as Engineer (Thermal-Mechanical) Grade I (SL) under the Fertilisers and Chemicals Travancore Limited, Udyogamandal. The grievance of the petitioner is with respect to the non- reckoning of the service spent by him as trainee-cum- probationer from 20.1.1992 for the purpose of seniority and such other service benefits. To alleviate the said grievance he has approached the respondent by filing Exts.P6 and P7 representations. It is the inaction on the part of the respondent to consider Exts.P6 and P7 that made the petitioner to file this writ petition. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also the learned Stand Counsel for the respondent. Evidently Exts.P7 representation submitted by the petitioner seeking redressal of the aforesaid grievance WP(C).No.24055/2011-F. 2 is still pending consideration before the respondent. Since Ext.P7 is pending before the respondent, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider Ext.P7 representation and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law expeditiously, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, (Judge) Kvs/-