1 SBCivil Writ Petition No.7413/2007 Allarak Khan Pathan vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 13 th May, 2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Moti Singh, for the petitioner. Mr. D.S.Rajvi, for the respondents. ..... By order dated 29.10.2007 (Anx.5) the deputation of the petitioner was cancelled and he was ordered to repatriated to his original posting. While assailing validity of the order aforesaid, the contention of counsel for the petitioner is that no such order could have been passed as the deputation was made after selection. It is also stated that the direction was erroneously given by the respondents to the petitioner to join duties at CRCF, Bori Mada (Marwar Junction). I do not find any substance in the argument advanced. The deputation of the petitioner was as per administrative instructions and a decision was taken by the respondents to repatriate all the deputationists to their original posts. Such an administrative decision is not open to interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 2 The direction given to the petitioner to join duties at Bori Mada (Marwar Junction) is also of purely administrative in nature and is only to execute the instructions of the Government of Rajasthan relating to repatriation, thus, that too does not requires any interference. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. Kkm/ps.