THE HON’BLE SRI JU​STICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3681 of 2009 Date:11.09.2009 Between: A. Madhava Achary. ..Petitioner AND Nandyalam Sreenivasan ..Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3681 of 2009 ORDER: This revision is directed against order dated 29.04.2009 passed in I.A.No.3 of 2009 in O.S.No.158 of 2005 by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Chittoor, whereby the trial Court, while allowing I.A.No.2 of 2009 in O.S.No.156 of 2007 and I.A.No.3 of 2009 in O.S.No.158 of 2005, clubbed the suits - O.S.Nos.158 of 2005 and 156 of 2007 and ordered for joint trial to be recorded in O.S.No.158 of 2005. The petitioner herein filed O.S.No.158 of 2005 for specific performance of an oral agreement of sale against the respondent herein, who in turn filed O.S.No.156 of 2007 for eviction of the petitioner herein. The respondent herein filed the above two interlocutory applications seeking to club both the suits and also to conduct joint trial. The trial Court, considering that the property involved is one and the same and so also the parties, to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, allowed the interlocutory applications clubbing the suits and ordered for joint trial to be recorded in O.S.No.158 of 2005. The only grievance of the petitioner is that he, being the plaintiff in O.S.No.158 of 2005, may be permitted to adduce evidence independently in both the suits otherwise great prejudice would be caused to him. Having heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the material available on record, and in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, especially since the property involved in both the suits is one and the same and so also the main parties, there would not be any prejudice to any of the parties, if joint trial is conducted by clubbing the suits. What all the evidence or material that the petitioner wanted to adduce independently can as well be adduced in the joint trial. In that view of the matter, the discretion exercised by the trial Court does warrant inference by this Court. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J 11th September, 2009 GHN