c- ^v. oOv LE BENCH IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAmi AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.No.^ 3 2^2005 PETITIONER RESPONDENT . J..^fc':^^ ^^^^^ p,e^eou_,,..^.-";"" O' :^ Smt. Ganga Bai Wd/o Late Ramcharan, Aged about- 55 years, R/o. Village- Godhana, Tehsil- Nawagarh, District- Janjgir Champa (C.G.) VERSUS :^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, O 5 District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh). The Collector, Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). ..•--^"^^Vj < ^ .3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Janjgir, < ^ District-Janjgir-Champa(C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. under: The above named petitioner respectfully beg to submit as 'TPreff^TT^ \jT^<-qi<||COq;U>-n|<<-|<|<o, (qowy^ n^.......^l..}.a}.'\i.}.a.^.. ^200 3TT^?T IW? (ticl^«e{) 3?T^^Tc^RFrfc^ ^SITOT^$T^1qTO ^RTTW? ^Tf^cT 3Tf^$T counsel Ifor the 13.6.2008 Shri P.K. Patel; Shri Saadeep Dubey, G^ Heaxxl. The petitioner has 226/227 of fhe Constitutioa on the part of fhe respondents). The petitioner's case is| Mujanu, who was workmg on i Vfflage Godhaiia, TeshU Malguzars had graated a 20.34 acres Patsvari Halka N4 siace then the petitioner possesslon of tfae said laad P-5 & P-6, The petitioner'sl No.2632/2000 entiUed as others and W.P. No.2064/20^0 of M,P, & ofhei^ vide order competent authority to graiit werc Kotwars before 1950, c4 P-3 and circular dated 18.5,< In compliance of the said ord^ (Annexure P-1) under Sectio^ before respondent No.S-Sub Bhumiswami right, but application. petitioner. ^vt. Advocate for the State, pre|feired this writ petition under Ardcle J3f India being aggrieved by tfae maction WI<<Io<Tly1 ^M^V^'fe^l <Rr|^l^ ^5'3ri^T3TT^$T that she is fhe granddaughter of Late |the post ofViUage Kotwar before 1950 io. lawafearh, District. Janjgir-Champa. The tiien of land bearing Khasra No.24 Rakba 12 to the grand fafher of petitioner and her ancestoxs are ia contiauous fhe rclevant dociioients are Axmexuie further case is that in writ ^titBon Das & others Vs. State of M.P. & entitled as Tikarain & othera Vs, State 30.10.2001 this Court dirccted thc |Bhuxniswa3iii rights to the Kotysrars, who ^pies of the orders ai^vAnnexures P-2 & issued ia ffais rcgard is Annexure P-4. |;rs fhe petitioner had filed an appMcation 57(2) ofthe Land Rcvenue Codc, 1959 IDivisional Officer, Janjgir tbr grant of res^ondent No,3 is not deciding the said Nawafearh plojt ^iid atid Cl^habil dfetted .0)4 SP/FS/2005-20,000 *i 1*101 a?TT^ ;3^T '-^Mlrt'y, tPTTl^-l<l<o, Rrtl'<-iy'< ..^e...m.tiQ^. 3IT^?T q^q? (^cli^d^) ^Ft^OO w^^Tc^rf^rt^ ^sn3TT^$T^Hte ?^TTW:^rf^T3TT^^T _^ Leamed counsel for fhe be directed to decide the apl>l order, to wNch lcanied couns^l Having heard learaed c^ to the facts and circumstance^ to decide the application of C.G. Laad Revenue Gode, 19^ todav io. accordance wifh lam, Witb the direction afore^ Consequently, M.W.P. 3748/05 also stand disposed Certified copy as per Ipetitioner subxxuts fhat spox»deritNo,3 ip|>lication of the petttioner aiid pass fhe for the respoudents has no objection* ^unsel for fhe parties ond having regard of the case, respondent No.3 is direeted p^titioner filed under Section 57(2) of the ^9 wifhin a period af fhree x&onfhs froia ^aid, the petition stands disposed of. |No. 1580/05 & I.A. Nos. 3747/05 & bf. —— rulfes cpmfo<nx1 TTR^f^f^^l ^^-Cl^ ^3lKl+l3n^$T Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (r^ r SP/FS/2005-20,000 ^