HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURB CHHATTI8GARH: BILA8PUR Sing^e Bench: Hon*ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. WRIT PBTITION N0. 2765 OF 2002 Petitioner Versus Respondents :1. 2. 3. 4. 5. M.S.K. Khokhar, aged about 68 years, S/o Late Shri M.W.K. Khokhar, Occupation-NU, Retired Govemment Servant, R/o Housiag Board Colony, Raigarh (C.G.). State of Chhattisgarh, \ Through Secretary, Department of ComLmerce & Industnes, Mantralaya, D.K.S, Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.). State of Madhya Pradesh, Through Secretary, Departmient of Coinnierce & Industdes, VaUabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.). ComLmissioner Industdes, Madhya Pradesh, Vindhiachal Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.). Dircctor, Directorate of Pension & Accounts, Bhopal (M.P.). Joint Director, Pension & Accounts, Bilaspur(C.G.). Present: Shri Ashish Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondents No. 1 and 5/State. ORALORDBR (4th January, 2006) Heaid. 1. Leanied counsel for the petitioners submits fhat the petitioner was workmg as Joiat Director/Manager ia fhe Departaient of Commerce & Indusfries at Distdct ludustries Centre, Raigarh. The petitioner retired fromi fhe service on 31.7.1992 on superannuation, 2. The petitioner has filed this petition prayiag for grant ofdues of pension and other consequential benefits. Leamed counsel for fhe petitioner farfher submits fhat fhe petitioner has been paid atl his retiral benefits except Rs. 1245/- towards fhe principal aaiount with iatercsyt aiaounting about Rs. 12000/ -. 3. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, leamed counsel for fhe respondents No. 1 aad 5 submits fhat ia view of Section 49 read witii clause 2 of 6th Schedule, the State of Chhatdsgarh is not required to make aay payment of any pension as the petitioner has retired long back on 31.07.1992. Be that as it may, the petitioner confines his subniission for Uberty to inake a representation to the appropriate respondent for consideriiig his case in accordance with law, to which learaed counsel for fhe respondents have no objection. lu fhe facts, circunistances aad submiission ia the case, fhe petitioner is granted Uberty to make a representation before appropriate aufhority for payraent ofbalance amount ofpension, ifany, in accordaiice with law aad fhe same may be considered and Bablu decided wifhin a period oftwo monfhs from the date ofreceipt of the representaflon. 4. In view of the foregomg, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge