HIGH CGURT OF CHEAT‘T?SGARH AT m5“ MEIR WRIT PETXTO‘J (C‘ \R) 33W of2{} PETETEONER : Shrikant Somawar, son of Late Shri B.C.Somarwar. aged about 49 years, residerrt of Behiod Ganga Nureing HOme, Jagaipur, Raigai‘h, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS . State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Scheduied Caste/Schedule Tribes Welfare, Mantraiayzg Dau Kalyan Singh B‘aawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Vatioum Commiasion 10x Scheduled TubEs ('mve'mmem n? Hidm 6 Flonr ‘P’ Wmc T 9k N a‘< Bhawan khan \Iaiket, \Tew Dsim 3. ChhaLtisgarh Ragya Amisuchlt Janjdh Aayog ’{hrough its Secretary, 61, Jai Vihar CObny, Ra£pur, Ch};éiiisgm‘h. 4. Iociiari 0i} Corporation Ltd... through the Chairman —cum ~111a11aging Director, Indian Oil Bhawan, G—9, Ali Yavar Kunc Maw Bandra (Eaat) Mumbai Mahmashtra 5, Onsf Awa Manager Imha 01} Coxpoxaucn Ltd VIP Road Razpur Chhattiagarh VVRIT PETITEGN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON QTITI TTTOV OF NWNA SB Hen hie 5hr: §amh K Agmhoti 1, J i’resent: Shri Manindra Sinivastava, Senior Advocate with Shri Amrito Dast Advocate for the petitiOner. Shri Alok Bakshi, Govermnent Advocate for the Smte/responden‘t N0. 1. ma‘i ($1,. RoAosny, (1 1‘? _ 1 ~‘ aux/Mata .\ J_ fOf the résponéeilt Na 4 ami 5. RES?ONDENTS ORDER GRAL) (Passed on 18“ day of August, 2009) Shri Koshy: learned counsal appearing for the respondents 4 and 5 submits that ‘ihe respondents 4 and 5 do net propose to take aay act§on againS‘t the peiitiogxer on the basi< of the reoonnnendation dated ‘28ch ‘Vicw 2009 (Aimexure P 2) made bV the respondent No 2 Aetzon mav be taken oniy after the High Power Caste Scmtmy Comm1ttee takes up the matter and passes final oeder against him in regard to the social status ofthe petitioner. In View of the above submissim, according to leamect counsei apyearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication at this Sta E8. Consequentiy the Writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- ‘ Satish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge