IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2010 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 RP.No. 930 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.11706/2001 Dated 18/08/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS IN OP ------------------------------------ 1. THE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA OFFICE, MUMBAI-400 021. 2. THE ZONAL MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, ZONAL OFFICE, CHENNAI. 3. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004. BY ADV. SRI.S.EASWARAN RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER ------------------------- M.J.WATSON, T.C.8/9, PAMALA COTTAGE, THIRUMALA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.MANOJ. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.N. RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------- R.P.No.930 of 2010 in O.P.No. 11706 of 2001 ------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of December, 2010 O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners in the review petition, who are the respondents in O.P.No.11706 of 2001, seek a review of the judgment delivered by me on 18.8.2010. Relying on Annexure A I instructions, it is contended that a casual employee like the petitioner who was engaged on daily wages is not entitled to regularisation or to have the upper age limit relaxed for the purpose of direct recruitment. However, Annexure-A I itself contains a stipulation in paragraph VII that a temporary employee who has worked for a minimum period of 85 days or more in a financial year will be allowed relaxation in upper age limit to compete in the immediately following regular recruitment under the recruitment instructions. All that I had directed by the judgment sought to be reviewed was that as the petitioner was a casual employee and is entitled to age relaxation even going by the Regulations framed by the Life Insurance Corporation of India, while making recruitments in future to Class IV posts, the petitioner shall be given an opportunity to apply for such appointment without reference to the upper age limit. The direction issued by me on 18.8.2010 in O.P.No.11706 of 2001 is not in conflict with the R.P.No.930 of 2010 2 instructions in Annexure-A1. I, therefore, find no error apparent on the face of record warranting a review of the judgment in O.P.No. 11706 of 2001. The review petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. nj. P.N. RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------- R.P.No.930 of 2010 in O.P.No. 11706 of 2001 O R D E R Dated: 1st December, 2010 -------------------------------