‘kB CJ 189/0511) P R.11/94I2’000 ‘ -. “WM |ll|||||||||ll||H CFOOOO H .: \\& APPEAL OF PRISONER 5g g5 Namea5-a‘3t9wl/a‘9‘ Father s name $1?“ W_z}mw awn“WW Resldence pqg__wc jge .. __ *2 3 cvé" Sentnc - eed to 9w7~9 7 Wwgpzrc W%;n $T iiwr 2319i, ‘ QWQFJ‘ t p s l { e o i l Date of Applicatipn for copy of Judgement Date on whiéh copy received............. It ls explalned to the pnsoner that 1f he stateS or w1shes to be represented by legal ractltloner the Appellate Court w11l not proceed‘wnh the base for seven Gays unless ' egal practmoner appears If the legal pract1t1oner does not appear w1thm seven he may not heard at all lfthe pnsoner states that he does not Wtsh to be repre- nted by legal practrttoner the court may proceed at once wnh the case and Wtll not be bllged to gtve a heanng to any legal pract1t1oner who should appear yD§ate on which Appeal sent .. Qua/e: [97 Whether the prtsoner Wtshes to be represented or not - Yes / No NamevglZ—gg Wgp Jk“ ..... 0F???" Ia“ W Camry ' Confinedtn It No 29§ /%?—ll$7 . e Dated _. twig/1997 N WW Forwarded to th WWa-mmy'a togather whtch a copy of Judgement or order passed 1n the case for favour of trans- mtssron to the proper Appellate Court. WEE W q Jab—2177m 23/945g9— \ztohm‘-r, o Cen’rol (MPI W % 7gp. 'a . Date of receipt in‘ office“ Date of recetpt record to accompany the Memo of Appeal to the Appellate court t No ‘3.“ . , Dhte§amekmaam4§z9w Forwarded to th , ‘hghwofMaéhnPIIduw Jaeaurtm t e ...... t‘ Date of receipt in; Appellate Court t '¥N$NMma—« ‘ é ‘ “*7 ” m|| WW y l M rm 1 . M e 5 XI-HCZZ - _ Bw:s:on gaggh = " .;, Hm ble AW“ L C Bhadoo and Honbla Mr Dhwendm Mishra J'J' 2¢ 4 2G$6 ; x ?er L L, ahadaa T - > By 11115 appeai under Sec‘hon 74 (2) af The Code of Cr‘lrmna! Procedure J fhe’hccused/appellanf has quesfmn ,of sowmhcn and order of senfenc deded 9-7-97 assw by The Adc% hum! ‘ ’Addi‘homl Sessmns Judge afTar ’commlssmn of offence under Secf n 302 of The IP sem‘end him T umergo Impmsonmen‘? for Me and pa a fine of Rs5OOG/— m (e‘au? a‘f ‘egafy cmd correcfness 0f Te udgmam‘ h h J p ’ C ce o y J ’ paymenf of fine +0 fur-Thar undergo § I fer om ea We case cf The prosecunon t brief is iha‘r Rakesh Kumar Verma (PW- L) gave fhe Dehaf: Nahshi (EXP 1) IV Pohce S'rafion Ehamam on 23 9 93 a GO5O hours ac the effecf Thaf he} reSidem‘ of Viiiage Tenafur and he i reswmg m “fhe vxHage aleng wrrh hls mofhw Bent: Ba! Wife one son agzd 4 year's and ene daugh‘rer aged Six ma V hs On 16 9—93 his Wife had gone m hat” ecfion campaign 'fhei‘efore his mafher" a Mr Praveen Das courtsel for ‘he apeHah pf Mr JNS Den Addmomi Pubhc Prosecu‘rcr‘ With Mr MP5 h‘h «Panel Lawyer .or ’rhe Sfare/responde nf r' Oral judgmen? <iic‘rafed ah D Se$3aons Judge Baioda Bazaar m ess‘om Tma¥ No 23/94 whereby iearned ldmg fhe accuse/upeilam‘ gudi‘y fsxr' '[wW’ v ‘ e yr p ? s ~. mafernal name and he ws busy m ' l Baa . ‘ o dp renew? ExP—l anti merg'infimm‘ion EXP-2 Receivind This fi’r‘sf £nfbrmafior given by Rukesh fhe Inves?3gafmg C ‘A fer“ gavmg no‘hce Ex P-3 ‘I’o The P ' (E‘ ~4) of fhe dead bady of Bem pi) sessaan under Ex P 5 an tsémg pro: m‘aa prepared uemenf plasfer shmed u-‘rézkaw im V mfh bbod ane broken ptgce a; woec were #aund m fhe f131' cf Bena Ea: on; pipe were fallen mm poseess on under The accused which were s‘mmed m’rh EyP 10 Hairs of fhe head of me a« 7v Ex P-12 Cb‘rhas cf The aeceasea we The accusad wa$ exammed by Dr R ‘ ExP 14 The STa’non House Officer 'papers regts’rered fhe F I R (EXP 15‘ ulms conducted by Dr Prakash Josh! (F 2é He epmed +naf fhe cause m‘ deci- Bfood sTmned arTTdes were senT for hemlcal. exammaTIcn To Forensyc $cTence' . Labora‘i'ory, Ralpur from where reporT Ex.P~2§A"waé receivedand ‘SerologisT I ' rzpor'? Ex P 25 was aiso received .k, ‘ Judwml MagIsTmTe FlrsT ulass Babd Bazaar who m Turn commTTTed The case ‘am .' l i I I I 1 x I fficet" Ieff fer The scene “of cccurren‘ce.’ inches, 'he prepared The inques‘? reporf " ' ' x Bai e Gne bush—shirf wee Taken in‘m' iuced by Rakeeh Verma Sire plan Ex Pe7 wlfh bioad and plam cemen‘r p§asfer were 1 under EXP 8 ( I ‘ . W / . \ )ne braken piece of woaden chair stained en chair sfnmed mfh biocd, haw-s whrche ‘ +‘orch,ene knife and a pierce'of‘usbesf'es . ' EXP-a9. .One bush-shirf and fun pan? bf alaod,‘ Were .mken’in‘ro possession under cusea were Taken info possessiah wider ’r‘e faken inw passess'wn unde'r' Ex P-13 ’ , Tiwam who prepared The mJury repor" based on The merg InTImaTmn ane oTher PosT—morTem on The bady cf Bane 8m ' ’Wn13) and he prepared The reporT Ex P- 1 as agphyxm a3 a resulT of sTronguiaT-aon v n charge sheeT was fded m The CourT of AfTer compieTlon of invesTIgo‘h g r f0 ”Hwy Sessions Judge vRa'ipLir frdi'n where !ear‘ned Addi‘l‘ion'a! Seseigns Judge, knela Bazaar received The case on fr ‘esfablish‘ eharge againsl' The, accusedl z The proseaufian in order To l > CrPC‘vms recorded m which he den 2 fhmnhe 13 mnacen‘i‘ and he has been f ‘Nir'mal A- _ Affer hearing iedrned ’cbuhsel $23$i§orxs Judge convécj'ed and senfznc fhis judgment / , We have heard Mr Praveen D( I Mr U N 5 Dee leamed Addmona} P Dick/respondent learned Panel Lawyer on behaif of fhe l \ The homICIdaI death of Bena E (PWT13) whe conduc‘red post-morfem stafed fhcn‘ +here were 12 injuries on e mbs of Ief+ slde and 5*“ 6*“ & 7“ and The cause of deafh was asphyxla d As far as mvalvemen? of fhe a cused/appellan‘r In The cmme m quesl'wn ‘e 'ls cancerned Rakesh Kumar (PW 1) w a Is sen of fhe deceased has slafed m his ewdence lha‘l‘ an ’rhe fal'efw nigh andlkmcked The door When The doo ‘ ” [@éfee ansfers for Trial. ‘ ‘ ’s exam ned 13 m‘hwesses Sm‘femen‘r of The accused Undee Secfion 313 of The ’ ed “rhe prosecu‘i‘wn ewdence and smfed :lsely Implicai‘ed m The case by Rakesh & \ \ . or respective par'hes learned Addl‘hcmal ed lhe amused as mam-toned m para 1 of r 3s leashed caunsel for fhe appelldn‘r and lbllc Prosecufor with Mr MP5 Bha‘ha, " la: ls no? m dishufe Dr Prakaéh Joshi on The body of deceased gem Bat has ‘ fhe body of lhe deceased her 6” 7*” & ‘lbs of mgh'l' Side were found frac‘lur‘ed e ‘l'a sfmngulaflon v . . a'l‘ 10 3O To 10 45 he reached his house was no’r opened he cllmbed on ‘lhe roof a ’ l i r XI-HC-z’zr A3.1 la,“ ' ' ‘ s GWC 7.wwmgi 7 > fha‘r Bis: r'éofher’ Was lying fkrf ‘in fhe 1 cf fhe house from behind anti saw cour‘l’yar’d of fhe house We accused wfas stffmg on her chesf and pressing her- okmg here and fher’e Affer' cllmbmg on V 'V wxfh fhe hoip of a cemeni‘ plpo and, i B’hjagwofd and [smn‘i‘gd' nois§ng adds V .V ' hands <3§ iegs of fhe accused Wlfh a mi he accused Jand; Therga’ffer‘, They 1*ied -'-. ' ' ‘neck wwh befh fha hands and he was‘lc .ffhe roaf af fhe house ha gm“ dowr "fheréuffer' he caugh’r hold of accusa rwhych neighbourers came they saw she was already dead There was a chrrh round fhe neck of her mo‘rher The V' \ wooden smol and ofher arflcles were Iwng sfomed wd‘h blood Thereof‘l'er he f f fe!ephoned h) 1'he Police S‘ra‘hon and lo< ged The reponf Ex P-l Dhanumm (PW 2) & Gend Bxhar ‘rhe emdence of Rokesh Kumar' (PW-1) ‘H’m? on hearing fhe screams of Rokesh ~ and on opemng fhe doc. They saw ThoT accused Bhogwo‘h was presenT There and fhereaffer Efhey saw fhaf Beno Bo: wasv ‘ he? was caughf hoid by “me wllagers and / air1'ecdy dead 1‘ ’ur‘fickes Were'fok’en’ info possession fr< . the Serclcgisf vapor? (EXP 25) and f! found sfamed wnh human b!ood wffnesses (PW 1 PW 2 d ?W 3) de1 uhrehable or unTrusTworThy NoThmg h s come on record which shows ThoT The ‘ V' z _ on i )e Thereaffer' ho sow ‘nis mo‘rher V’bu? ‘ / Bloc/d stained doi‘hes of The ac« { c ‘ ’ . - _ {Q Gendmnx (PW 3) have corrobonm'ed and They have sfofed m fhe‘r ewdence w ‘ I . fhey wen? fowords +he house of Rokeshr e I used & fhe deceased and bfoodsfmned tm The place of occurrence, and as per I 1e F s L reporf (Ex P-25A) some were f Ln cross exammo‘l'lon of These Three. ‘ - ence has nof been able ‘l‘o ellcrl onyr fhese wrl‘nesses can be hed “lo be ”ltww‘ clrcums’ronce whereby fhe ewdence [11%W of ammosH-y or oiher‘ ground Th ~ ’ ewdence of fhese ?hree eyewnne Is conéls‘renf rehable and cagen’r Therefar‘z we do no? find any illega or mfgr’mxfy m The Judgmenf of fha fmc ccusad has been roped m on accou a ! s ‘s Couri‘ holding The accused/appelianf 1‘0 commission of fhe murdzr cf Bane Ba: g . \ In fhe resulf we do nof fmd a ; subsfange in'this apeqlrsame £5 hable p ‘1‘0 b; dismmsed and I? is hereby chsrms Sdl- ‘ % L.C.Bhadoo ‘ Judge ,H MMW‘J [fWWh‘ x—~:-¥r W e h ! '