IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10592 of 2010 PANKAJ KUMAR SON OF SRI RAJENDRA SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.4.2010 Supplementary Affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, which is kept on the record, Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 379 and 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code. When one Govind Kumar was arrested, he gave a confession before the police and on his confession the petitioner was named, who confessed to have purchased a laptop from Govind Kumar and had given for repair to one Hemant, from where the laptop was recovered. It has been submitted that there is no parent case of theft with regard to the laptop and the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 14.11.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in Lakhisarai (Chanan) P.S.case No.578 of 2009 (G.R.No.1247 of 2009), subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the - 2 - petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the bailor shall give an affidavit that he shall inform the court on any change in address of the petitioner and also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and (iv) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )