IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23729 of 2008 LALTU KUMAR @ LALTU MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 1.7.2008 Heard. The case is under Section 394 IPC. The petitioner is not named in the FIR nor anything has been recovered from his possession. The contention is that the theft property has been recovered from co-accused Biren Sada. The petitioner has not been put on test identification parade. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing P.R. bond of Rs.500/-(five hundred) without any surety to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Samastipur in Musarigharari P.S.Case no.75 of 2007. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )