[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVN.APPLN.NO.331 OF 2008 Smt.Snehalata Vikram Kamble and two others ..Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.U.B.Nighot advocate for Applicants Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 29, 2008 DATE : JULY 29, 2008 DATE : JULY 29, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking discharge in Sessions Case No.333 of 2008. The said case pertains to CR No.109 of 2006 of Saswad Police Station. The said case is under Section 306 of IPC. 3. The applicant no.1 was wife of deceased Vikram. [-2-] Applicant no.2 is the father of applicant no.1 and father in law of deceased Vikram. It is the prosecution case that the applicant no.3 was having an affair with applicant no.1 who was the wife of the deceased. 4. The complainant is brother of deceased Vikram. Complainant has inter alia stated in the complaint that the applicant no.1 was having an affair with applicant no.3. When his brother Vikram raised objection to the said affair, at that time, applicant no.2 who is father in law of Vikram, stated that he would involve Vikram in a case under Section 498-A of IPC and send him to jail. The suicide note of the deceased also mentions love affair between applicant no.1 and applicant no.3. The suicide note also mentions that applicant no.1 got pregnant due to her relations with applicant no.3 and she was five months pregnant. This fact gave tension to Vikram. In the suicide note, it is stated that though Vikram was not staying with his wife since last seven months, yet his wife had conceived and she was five months pregnant. It is also mentioned that Vikram had caught his wife i.e. applicant no.1 in a compromising position with [-3-] applicant no.3. Looking to the facts stated in the complaint as well as in the suicide note, there is sufficient material to proceed, hence, no case is made out for discharge. 5. Application is rejected. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]