IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3987 of 1994 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- HARGOVANBHAI J PATEL Versus MEHSANA DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: None present for Petitioners None present for Respondent No. 1 MR SK PATEL, AGP for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 30/09/1999 ORAL JUDGEMENT The matter is placed on board on the note filed by the learned counsel for the respondent No.1, which reads as under : "The above-mentioned petitin was filed by one Hargovanbhai Joitaram Patel and others against the dues of the bank. However, now the petitioners had already deposited all dues and amount and therefore, nothing is required tobe remained with the bank and in view of that the certificate is also issued by the bank to the Society of the petitioner (No Due Certificate) and in view of that now this petition do not survive and therefore, office maybe directed to place this matter for disposal before appropriate court". Copy of this note was given to the counsel for the respondents on 21/9/99. The averments made in this note are not controverted by the petitioner. The absence of the counsel for the petitioner also suggestive of the fact that the petitioner has no objection in case this petition disposed of by this court as nothing now substatially survives therein. Order accordingly. In the result, the Special Civil Application is dismissed as having become infructuous. Rule discharged. Interim relief, if any, granted by this court stands vacated. No order as to costs. (S.K.Keshote, J.) *Pvv