HIGH QOHRT OF CHHATI'WRH: BILASPUR Writ Petition m No. $525 Q: 2905 Dr. PUrshottam Rao Choudhary, sic. Late Shri MR. Choudhary, aged abaut 51 years, retired aS' Assistant Surgeon from Primary Health Centre Masturv Dist. Bilaspur (CG),s residing at" Saras'viéti Nagar: opposite Pratap Talkies Biiaspur (CG) Petitioner Versus Respondents 1) State of M.P. through the Secretary, Department of Public Health and Famiiy Wetfare’ Govt. of MP. Vallabh Bhawan, BhopaL MP. 2) State of Chhattisgam; through the Secretary, _ Department of Public Heatth and Famtty Welfare, Govt. of Chhattisgam, Saohivalaya .Bhawan, Raipur, CG. 3) The Commissioner; Department of Health, Directorateof Health Services; Satpura Bhawan, ’ BhopaHMP). 4) The Chief Medical and Health Ofhcer, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur (CG). ' (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) SB: Hon’ble Mr. SaSsh K. Agnlhotri, J. Present: Shri N.N. Roy, counsel forthe petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 33- 2008) This case pertains to grievance of non-grant of retiral dues. This Court, in the matter of W.P.No.4642l2004 (Baijneth Mandel Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh 8. others) and other connected ~maters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retrial dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was conetitutedhy the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19-06-2006 passed in W.P.No.1961l2006' (Smt; Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), and order dated 1502—2008 passed in W.PrNo.132312006 (Nevin Kumar Bisariya Vs. State of q Chhattisgarh and another). Thus, this patition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31" January, 2008 passed in W.'P.No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal (supra) ) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2) With the consent of the parties, this petition is accordingiy disposed of in the same ten'ns i.e., the office of the Advocate Generai is directed to send the case‘to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shalt issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concerned, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shaii consider and pass order, in accordance with law! aiter affording proper opportunity of hearing to I the petitioner. The petitioner and the ofiicers concerned may hie additionaii documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, inciuding payment of retirai dues, if any, to the petitioner, be completed within a period of four monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3) The petitioner shaii supply extra copy of the petition to Shri Satish Gupta, learned Government Advocate for the State, for onward transmission to the Committee. _~—-~ sw- Jl " Satish K. Agnihom ‘li l Judge . . i ‘- Raju r