1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.2165 OF 2006 Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi Petitioners vs. Security Guards Board for Gr.Bombay & ors.Respondents Ms.Ranjana Todankar for the petitioners. Mr.Neel Helekar with Mrs.Savita Deshpande i/b.M/s.Haresh Mehta & Co. for the respondent no.2. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED : 9th October, 2006 P.C. Respondents 1 and 3 though served are not present. Appearance is put up on behalf of respondent no.2. 2. Rule. Heard forthwith. 3. It is the case of the petitioners that the persons whose names are listed in Exhibit "A" are employed with respondent no.2 who at the time of filing the petition was not registered. On behalf of respondent no.2 the learned counsel now shows us a notification dated 19th September, 2006 whereby they are registered. 4. In the meantime the guards have also applied to 2 respondent no.1 for its registration. In the light of that the present petition is finally disposed of by the following directions: (i) Respondent no.1 to consider the pending application of the guards in Exhibit A represented by the petitioners herein and dispose of the same not later than two weeks from today. (ii) On the guards being registered, respondent no.2 to comply with the order dated 19th June, 2006 issued by the respondent-State. (iii) In the meantime, the petitioners to continue with the employment of respondent no.2. 5. Rule made absolute accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. ( F.I. REBELLO, J.) F.I. REBELLO, J.) F.I. REBELLO, J.) ( ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. ) ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. ) ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. )