-f} o ,s.\^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICA1URE AT BIIASPU8 (CG) WRIT PETITION N0» Q^^ ^ OF 2004 BETWEEN Abhilash Agn^botri s/o Late shrl Dayabodh Agaibotri, aged aboat 22 years^ r/o near Old Bus Stand Baloda Bazar district Raipur ^ ^>^ PETITIONER i ^^••r^"..--' ^:^"" ] ,.>t*.<^v''" ^>" s ••'*\V?4y'<^-2.-'"" A N D ^>^ ^••••-"'' ^{ip' 2* 3< ^A ,?^ ^ .^•^f ..€\?^ The state of Chhattisgarh^through the Secretary Scho&l Education^ Mantralay, D< K^ s^ Building R aipur • The Dlrector^ Public Instructionst Chhattisgarh^ Raipur^ iTolnt Director^ Pabllc Instractionsf Raipur • Dlstrict Educatioa Offjjcer» Raipiar^ Distrlct Raipur (CG)» RESPONDENTS 1<^.0; ^ ^- ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA + ^ XI-HC—78 3?T^T ^T "?<^Jch 'cT^T 3?H^T ^qNr ''^-' ~s~^ ^ww^, e>Tii<i<i<o, i®i<n!^^< ^,. W'P '2 C?7/ 2-^w^ 'WT^n" ^lff^""""""""""""""""1"""""""""""^^ 200 ^?r'q^^ C^I^^) 'i^nw^^^n^i 13.1.2005 Smt. Indira Tripathi, co) Shri V.V.S.Murthy, State/respondents. I.A.No.7508/2004 for i. Heard finally with the c< The case of the petit nQmely- Dayabodh A9nihotr 2.9.2001 during the course of\ is annexed as Annexure P-1. ^ fiied an application for compa^ Learned counset for thj submitted all the requisite ^ dated 21.6.2004, copy of th^ ^Nt<yl4i"i '^TR^ff ^ f^c2t lf^K$K ^^fw3i?i^ |insei for the petitioner. Dy. Advocate (5eneral for the rgent hearing is aljowed. »nsentof the parties. loner is that father of the petitioner , who wois working as Principa! in <?overnment Hi9h Schooi, K<|irhi Bazar, District- Raipur, died on his employment. His death certificate ifter the death of his father. petitioner ssionate appointment on 23,11.2001, copy of which is Annexure P-2. Vide document, Annejxure P-3 dated 21.6.2004, bistrict Education Officer, Raipur denJanded certain documents in this matter. 2 petitioner submits that the petitioner locuments on 22.6.2004 vide his ietter saidletter has been filed as Annexure P-4. She further submitsl that after this, the petitioner also submitted some more docum^nts which were reiated to decide his E.iiL-J.-... 4 XI-HC—78 ^n^i 'SFT i^ii^ 'd^l? 3?I^T'^1^' ~3^";:^PTRTO ^til^^^ [^<ni<rS^< 'WR^IT^fliT^" •^.200 ^IT^T'q'^'('^t^^) ^^?W^^T 3?I^T ^-- compassionate appointment cin<| after some time the petitioner could come to know that 26 perjsons were being appointed by the respondents but, the case of fhe petitioner was not considered. On this G representation was mac^ by the petitioner on 24.8.2004 vide Annexure P-5. Learned counsel for the filing of representation, no a< betitioner aiso submits that even after |:tion has been taken till todGy. She dies untimely, ieaving behind atl In the above facts and limited prayer of counsel for given to respondents to dis| appointment in the stipubted ^TRfeNh "RT^ff ^fe^t Ti^^K ^" 3tfOT%^? further submits that entire <jamily of the deceased is put on the verge of starvation, The sch4me of compassionate appointment has been brought to give immediojte support to the dependents of the deceased who died during t|ie course of hAs employment. The situation can easily be imagine| when the bread-earner of the family his family members. circumstances of the case, now the the petitjoner is that a direction be ;|?ose of the case of compassionate |)eriod so that the matter may not be delayed further. Learned counsel for th^ State does not oppose this iimited prayer of counset for the petiljioner. -s- XI-HC—78 3?n^[ ^i f<4Gh~ "^^? ^^w^ •v t JV^fc J_^ ^ .< Ml '3'^ ^!l^m4, ^ft^FTS, t^TOy wwff^w^ •^200. ^T^T 'q^^" (^f^^) i^iw^tNa^i - 3" In the opinion of this petitioner is reasonable anc| served if a direction be givei}i to the respondent authorities to dispose of the case of petitioner this writ petition before th^ petitioner, the authorities compassionate appointment ^N^ft^ ^wff ^ fe^ T^T^R ^3^?a??^i ourt/the prayermade by counsel for the genuine, The ends of justice wouid be is early as possible preferably within a periodof 3 months from th^ date of receipt of a copy of this order aiong with dn additional co^y of the writ petition filed before this Court. Consequently/ the pet|tion is allowed. It is diFected that the petitionerwill file a copy of fhis order along with ah Gdditionai copy of authorities concerned within a period of 15 days from today and 4n such documents, being filed by the jconcemed will dispose of the case of ^f the petitioner within a period of 3 months from the date pf sucji filing, With the above ob^ervations/ th€ petition stands finally disposed of. Certified copy as per rjules. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge