Civil Revision No. 6201 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6201 of 2009 Date of Decision: October 27 , 2009 Zile Singh ...... Petitioner Versus Kartari and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.Surender Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner. **** Ajay Tewari, J. This revision petition has been filed against the order passed by the learned lower Appellate Court whereby the matter has been remanded back to the trial court to send a report on the question whether the thumb impression of respondent Kartari appeared in earlier suit (since in the earlier suit she had suffered a decree in favour of the petitioner). Learned counsel has argued that the civil suit has been dismissed on the ground that the handwriting expert had not examined the disputed signatures with admitted signatures. It may be noticed that the handwriting expert had compared the disputed signatures with the signatures appearing on the plaint of the present suit. It was in this context that the lower Appellate Court came to the conclusion that it must be determined as to whether an impostor was produced in the previous suit or whether an impostor has been produced in the present suit. In my opinion the view taken by the learned Appellate Court would definitely advance the cause of Civil Revision No. 6201 of 2009 2 justice. Consequently this revision petition is dismissed. However, in the interest of justice it is directed that the petitioner would also be granted opportunity to produce a handwriting expert in case so required. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE October 27, 2009 sunita