1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1005/2009 Applicant :- Shri Kishore s/o Devidas Dandge, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Service, R/o Near Old Rest House Building, Tah. Ballarshah, Dists. Chandrapur. ...Versus... Respondents :- 1. Sau. Vaishali w/o Kishore Dandge, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Private Tuitions. 2. Chi. Sankalp s/o Kishore Dandge, Aged about 2 years (since minor through guardian Mother Sau. Vaishali Dandge). Both R/o LIC Colony, Moti Nagar, Dist. Amravati. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 02.03.2010 1. This matter was adjourned from September, 2009 since learned Counsel for both the parties told this Court that compromise has taken place between the parties. However, more than period of about six months has already gone but nothing has been placed on record regarding compromise. 2. None present for the parties before me. 2 3. I have gone through the impugned judgments and orders recorded by the Courts below. The trial Court found that the respondents were refused and neglected by the applicant/husband and therefore, they were entitled to maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is seen that the applicant is earning salary of about Rs.20,000/- per month and the trial Court has granted maintenance to both respondents @ Rs.3,000/- per month. In the background of the fact that the salary of the applicant is around Rs.20,000/- per month on the question of quantum of maintenance, awarded to the wife and the child, I do not think any error has been committed by the trial Court and the revisional Court in awarding maintenance to them. 4. In the result, I find no merit in the present criminal application. The same is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE SSW