IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12803 of 2010 1. MUKESH KUMAR S/O SHRI TRIVENI UPADHAYA R/O VILL.- SADAWEH, P.S.- DULHIN BAZAR, DISTT.- PATNA--PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, GOVT. OF BIHAR 2. THE STATE PROGRAMME OFFICER STATE HEALTH SOCIETY, BIHAR PARIVAR KALYAN BHAWAN, SHEIKHPURA, PATNA 3. THE IN-CHARGE (I/C) T.B. DIVISION, STATE HEALTH SOCIETY BIHAR PARIVAR KALYAN BHAWAN, SHEIKHPURA, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-CHAIRMAN DISTRICT HEALTH SOCIETY, BUXAR, DISTT.- BUXAR 5. THE CIVIL SURGEON-CUM-MEMBER SECRETARY DISTRICT HEALTH SOCIETY, BUXAR, DISTT.- BUXAR 6. THE DISTRICT TUBERCULOSIS OFFICER (D.T.O.) BUXAR, DISTT.- BUXAR 7. THE MEDICAL OFFICER IN-CHARGE (M.O. I/C) PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE (P.H.C.), RAJPUR, DISTT.- BUXAR----RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 5.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Right from selection letter till the appointment it is evident that petitioner has been appointed on contractual basis. If his contract has been rescinded he has remedy under common law. This writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India may not be the answer for him. This writ application is dismissed with the liberty as above. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)