IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellanious No.34725 of 2008 ====================================================== 1. Biresh Kumar Singh @ Biresh Singh. 2. Sidhi singh. 3. Lalan Singh. All are the sons of late Shambhu Singh. 4. Guden Singh, son of Sri Sidhi Singh. 5. Chandan Singh, son of Sri Vijay Singh. 6. Vijay Singh, son of late Mungeshwar Singh. 7. Baijnath Singh, Son of Late Mungeshwar Singh. 8. Dadan Singh, son of Sri Vijay Singh. 9. Babab Singh, Son of Sri Vijay Singh. 10. Mirtunjay Singh, Son of Sri Suryabansh Singh. 11. Nirbhay Singh, Son of Sri Suryabansh Singh. 12. Narendra Singh, Son of Sri Suryabansh Singh. 13. Nagendra Singh, son of Sri Suryabansh Singh. 14. Fool Singh, son of Sri Lalan Singh. 15. Kundan Singh, son of Sri Sidhi Singh. 16. Santosh Singh, son of Late Madho Singh. 17. Anil Singh, son of Awadhesh Singh. 18. Vijay Singh, son of Late Shambhu Singh. 19. Piyush Kumar Singh @ Soryu Singh, son of Siddhi Singh. 20. Sheetal Singh, son of late Shambhu Singh. All are the residence of village Simari Jaitiya, PoliceStation Navinagar, District- Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioners. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Balram Singh, son of Late Nathuni Singh, resident of village Simari Jaitiya, Police Station Navinagar, District- Aurangabad. .... .... Opposite Parties. 2 12-07-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order taking cognizance dated 23.07.2008. The submissions on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the case is false and fabricated. In view of the fact that some petitioners have filed a case under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code against the informant and others. It is submitted that there is a land dispute between the parties and the parties are related to each other. All these aspect of the matter cannot be considered at this stage of taking cognizance and as such this application is dismissed. Md. Ibrarul/- ( Sheema Ali Khan, J)