THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.27432 of 2010 Dated 08th February, 2011 Between: S.Ramakrishna Reddy and others …Petitioners And The Govt.of A.P., rep.by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri A.Ravinder For Sri P.Venkata Rao Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2: AGP for Panchayat Raj The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ or may be pleaded to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents in not implementing the amendment issued to clause 13(ii) of Annexure-I of G.O.Ms.No.94 I & CAD (PW-COD) Dept dated 01.07.2003 which was amended through G.O.Ms.No.17 I & CAD (PW-COD) Dept date 06.02.2004 in respect of enhancement of the percentage from 15% to 25% less than the estimate value of the works contract as illegal, arbitrary, unjustified and consequently direct the respondents to apply the said amendment in respect of the works awarded to the petitioners by the 2nd respondent with in the jurisdiction of the 3r d 4th respondents relating to furnishing Additional Security Deposit (ASD) on the less percentage on the estimated contract value.” At the hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners stated that due to certain unavoidable reasons, the petitioners are unable to file additional affidavit and that they may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition with proper pleadings and material. This request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.35027 and 35822 of 2010 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 08th February, 2011 VGB