IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 11592 of 2009 Between: 1 P. Balagangadhara Reddy S/o. Mahadeva Reddy R/o. 19-4-31, 3/H-12, S.T.V. Nagar, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 2 P. Swaroopa Rani W/o. P. Balagangadhara Reddy R/o. 19-4-31, 3/H-12, S.T.V. Nagar, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 3 N. Nirupama W/o. Bhanusekhar Reddy R/o. New Avadhi Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-10 4 Paleti Mayur Mahadeva Reddy S/o. Jayachandra Reddy R/o. H.No. 1/740, Dwarakanagar, Kadapa. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 Station House Officer, Kadapa I Town P.S. Kadapa 3 M. Harinarayana Alias Hari Babu S/o. M. Chandraiah R/o. Sandhya 70MM Theatre, Door No. 17-106/71 RTC X Roads, Hyderabad. ..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.BALAJI Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for the following substantial relief: “Hence, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction, preferably a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents, especially respondent No.2 in issuing the police notice calling upon the petitioners herein to attend the polygraph test on 16-06-2009, 17-06-2009, 18-06-2009, 19-06-2009, 20-06-2009 at Forensic Laboratories, Red Hills, Hyderabad, as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India by setting aside the same; and consequently stay all further proceedings pursuant to the Police Notice issued by the 2nd respondent, including the Polygraph test to be conducted on the petitioners herein.” At the hearing, Sri T.Balaji, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the petitioners availed the remedy of seeking quashing of the order passed and subsequent endorsement made by the Court of I-Additional District Munsif, Kadapa subjecting the petitioners to polygraph test. He, therefore, submitted that in view of the same, the cause in this writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to pursue the proceedings already initiated by them under Section 482 Cr.P.C. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP No.14930 of 2009 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 25th June, 2009 vrn