1 S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.3509/2006 Date : 17.08.2006 HON'BLE MR.SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. TR Singh Sodha for the applicant. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that co- accused has already been enlarged on bail by this Court in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.3452/2006 vide order dated 10.08.2006, therefore, the present applicant may also be enlarged on bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After considering the submission made before me 2 and taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case and the fact that co-accused has already been enlarged on bail, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the applicant Smt. Geeta Devi wife of Satya Narain shall be released on bail in FIR No.27/2006 P.S. Mahila Thana, District Bhilwara, provided she executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of Investigating Officer on the following conditions:- (i)That she shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii)That she shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Courkt or to any police officer and; (iii)That she shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. 3 vijayant