'3[Aoqo niBSBUg p^oy ttreo 1A3Q jo siuapisaj aq"). SJB ijv SJB3A ^ inoq-e psSy Bldn§uiqa IIIBH 3iy3"[ o/g 'Bidno ireABje^i BJPUSIOBJJ sjsaA. gg fnoqv pa§v v^drcs uiqa urey s^q o/g '%).dno ireAajBM uGumprajd sjea^ 6g tnoqB pagy v\dn3 jBrana mey[ smq o/g 'a^dno qsama sjesA g^ inoqa psgy 1 %(.dnS jBum^ UIB^ a-jBq o/g 1 te^dno qsamn | .Si SJB3A 9v inoqTi psBy %ldn8 jBian^ mBg si^q o/g ^+dno qsBqqng s.resA OQ inoqa p33y 1 ^qdng jeum^ urey aioq o/g j 'Bidno qsajng I sjes.f oz ^noqB paSy ^ldnS JBmn^ rcreH siBq O/A\ TBQ TiATUBTOXBq 800Z dOSSO^'OSWZZl vaHsiMvaa.NSaiHaaod U^U£biyte ^ >li»l»Jt|?'SJ ,t< jl->hlh l-(bt.>]bllt> (z (9 fe (^ Es (s (I saaNoiMAad NOIAIASd AIHA ,snr IHHS g^a^NOH : as Ui^iip uaji* >eiii»a ifclhife tt^UE UaB. <fcll.bj IDs Ik^llc. (hi'lbf.jbt.) tfekh l^ltc. OOZ .fcA. tto|h4i lUhlh ^TiftlUlsj 'SlrftlftiS 'h.l^lh.lh- tn.p SL-, ^-^ A 'y XI-HG—78 311^1 'W f<<-li+ 'cT^TT 3TT^?T ^RT^ r^i ^^ "^IOIrt'M, »Ti1'M'ie, fsKrll-Hy *ll*lWl th*iich""""""""""""""--"-'----^ 200 3IT^?ITPW (1cli^'!(<(() TOIIW ^ifer an^r VER! RESPONDENT 7.4.2008 Shri S. Rajas with SI petitioners. ]|ri Hemant Gupta, counsel for the By this petition i-ind^i India, the petitioners t^ 28.3.2008 (Aniitexure P/l)| at Bilaspur whereby the 1( the revenue revision of W dated 31.8.2007 (Annexi^re Surguja at Aaibikapur, by| respondent Jamuna Prai matter was remitted to direction to afford bppot regarding famUy setflemen}) thereafter, "fard batwcva' <t5f'ilfa<frl TTPT^ff "^f tS^ <f;af^f< ^7 3tRf7 3Ilt;f i AmbilEapur (CG) |[73 ! Jamuna Pi'asad Gupta 1 S/o Janki sao, Aged about 70 years, R/o Devi Ganj Road Snagam Chowk, Ambikapur JCG)_ jr Article 227 of the Constitution of fpsfe impugned the order dated passed by Board of Revenue (CG) barned Board of Revenue rejecttn^ petitioners, has upheld the order P/2) of fhe Upper Collector, [which the revision preferred by the |ad Gupta was allowed and fhe the concemed Tehsfldar with a ti-initv' of headng fo the parties in the previous partition and only be requisitioned. ' ; tte^ ^^\ .ffcB-2 'l K 'ltS9a'sf. !1 i r°Kiti i \!^^/ ' ''^GB^?.. - -—XI-HC—78 SiI^T ^iT ft-fi)* a«naii^i gnihi ^ST •<(l'4i<Yl<<, H>Til'M<is, facii'yy HWWl (btfrai •WI, 200 3^1 '^W (lpf3«I^IET) ?^IRR ^tfCT ail^l Leanied counsel for t Courts below i.e. Upper 0 have, in fact, recorded partition has taken place order of remand beconies ^ie petitioner submits that bofh the (jiUector and the Board of Revenue, findine in thetr orders that the |50 years back and therefore, the nfiearungless. I have heard leameifl have perused the unpufened available on record. Froui perusal of the Upper CoUector, which w^ Board of Revenue it is cle^r remitted to the Naib Tel opportunity of hearuii thereafter, taking into acc) the laad, eflect partition Darties. In view of aboye, direction to the concerned | after affording opportuni| accordance wifh fhe crii<it<n<inli ^w^ ^f fs%^ <f^l^TC ^ajfOTCT^r coiinsel for the petitioners and order and the documents |m.pugaed order passed by leamed ^.s subsequently confirmed by fhe that the matter has been sunply LsUdar with a dtrection to afford to the respective parties and [)unt fhe possession and quallty of ^s per list of partition between fhe tl|us petition is disposed of with a Naib Tehsildar to decide the matter ty of hearing to the parties, in provp.sions of Section 178 of fhe Land ..•S:s's3s-isia. ^!'ss^.'"''%,. ,(.y ^'~ '^.. '''% ^ %W2SW,.. kf l^^^ls^ -^. ^. ff' ^ V^FS:.t~" .^.'- ^'•as^I-HE—JS sn^r qii R-iitfi tTSff 3TT^?T ^il|N) ^ ~=T 7=T '•iWW^, »tl)'M'l<o, f«<MI'Mli< *<T*<?IT arHrai "^200 3ii^?r Ti=w C^f3»f^!:T) 'renwdfer sn^i Revenue Code, wifhout observations made bv fhe Revenue regarding earlier tteins UTfluenced by anv adverse ppper Collector and fhe Board of p^rtition between_the pajties—.- Sd/- DhirendraMisbra Judge 'onlCT'ili iwnl'? fttzt <Ri|^i< ^? aifim sn^r