IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2010 / 28TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 26235 of 2010(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- THE MANAGER, CORPORATE MANAGEMENT OF SCHOOLS, DIOCESE OF MUVATTUPUZHA, KEEZHILLAM, ERNAKULAM - 683541. BY ADV. SRI.KURIAN GEORGE KANNANTHANAM, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.TONY GEORGE KANNANTHANAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. LIGI GEORGE, HSA (MATHS) ST.PAUL'S H.S. VELIYANAD. BY SRI. DILIP MOHAN, GOVERNMENT PLEADER, R1, R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) 26235 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 19th day of August, 2010 J U D G M E N T Aggrieved by the rejection of approval to the appointment, the petitioner has approached the first respondent in revision. Ext.P4 is the revision petition filed for that purpose by the petitioner. It is dated 12.8.2009. Exts.P1 to P3 would reveal that the petitioner has already exhausted the other statutory remedies before approaching the first respondent in revision. Ext.P3 is a statutory revision. Therefore, the first respondent is bound to consider the same and pass orders thereon. In this circumstances, without making any observation as to the merits of the contention raised by the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 revision petition expeditiously,at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment with notice to the petitioner and the 3rd respondent. Sd/- C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE jma //true copy// P.A to Judge