Q^ \ ^ [^- (^ W^T'^^iT'1^ e'.lttt!"") *- t-'"";s'i<»' S^i.ii.i- 'i'; "•••'" BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTESGARH AT BILASPUR C_G, W.P.(S)39&^2009 PETCTEONER:- SS'-'s'-sss'i VERSUS RESPONDANTS:- ^u^" >^ ...--•::.,c^.-'- •^''"^'/^1<''1' /t).C.Biswas s/o Late Satya Kinkar Biswas aged 47 years head Constable CISF unit B.S.P.Bhilai Distt. t)urg C.6. ^ l.The Union of India Through Chief secretary Ministry of home affairs NEW Delhi. /^. birector General CISF Home ministry Saket new Delhi -17. .3.b.I.6.CISF.UniteBhilai. Distt. Bhilai. 4.The Asstt. Commandant CISF Unite Bhitai. Dist. Durg. WRIT PETCTION UNDER ARTECLEJ26, 22-L OF THE CONSTCTUTCON OF INblA FOR ISSUANCE OF_WRIT OF MANDAMUS .CERTCORI. AND OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT(SWRE)ER ETC. _PARTICULARS OF PETITIONER ^i..--"' ^' (S) XI-HC—78 -3^ -qiqiCiq, S'lillwiS, [sxiiyy ^^w.^..^°les,•^200^ Sn^T'1)^? (•jqt^t.q^) S^I^C^fW TT^T Sff^r sE^RT T^iiwgftg an^i ^ifiy -I^s&i's^'gi lc^"l^i^s^t's2i3° r^iv.^^s^'i le EVH r ^U^E.^^i-S; r'E'ls.lgi^ST I^g¥VCTn%iE <i. <.hb Shri Ariun Yadav counse! for th Shri Kashif Shaki! counsel for tl Chslienge in this petition is to P-1) by which the petitionsr has been Bhilal to Agra. Contention of the counsei for petltioner. tlfie respondents. Ihe order dated 20.7.2009 (annexure pefitioner is aiso a governrnent sew District Durg, CG. He further subm; specia! training to train dogs and thi transferred. He submits that the representation to the suthority concer decided. Counsel for the respondent make a suitabie representation to transfer order whlch would be dec thls proposition of the counsel for petltEoner showed his agreement. Accordingly, the petition is c the petitioner makes a representati £r'^,yy^ t^iis H''s";s r^? r^s^ssi?^^ rs'f rhr°;s^i^,^ ?<'"f t iIUiii lilC? U'dt^ Ui 1^^/^^pl ui L/upy yi 1 1% ^YHPCtsd iD {^^f^ld^ thft ffi^H^^ ?;f tO v.T/^l^^i—'lu'l.'ii/'tui(.i^ ^«<<w <iJ" i'»<•'^ i.i ji../ ii..)t.«i.i i t-^ i.Si.i a further period of four vveeks froiT •wriwN•wwff-ifft^ Tfa^K •^•affinOT^r reiieved after beins transferred from [he petitioner is that the v/ife of the n,'aht and is presentiy posted at Patan, |ts that the applicant has taken a srefore he ouaht not to have been betitioner has aiready made the isd but the same has not yet besn submits that iet the petitioner ^he authority who has issued the ided in accordance with iaw. To fne respondents, counsei for the 4id ^*rt^^ 1W isposed of with a direction that if |jn within a period of three weeks |i;s order, the authority concerned itrf]y in accordance with law within the date of its receipt. fe^t Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge