Respondents Petitfoner : Mansha Ram Rathiya Aged about 43 years, S/o. Shri Tilak Ram Rathiya, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Jobi, Block Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Versus State ofChhatSisgarh, Through Secretary, Schooi Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director Public Instruction Department Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer Raigarh District -RaJgarh(C.G.) 3. Bloek Education OfffcerKharsia Dlstrict - Ratgarh (C.G.) 4.' Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department Raigarh Distt. Ralgarh (C.G.) (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Hon'bie Justice Satish K. Aanfhotri Pregent : Shri Ani! Mourya, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri Yashwant Sirigh Thakur, Govf. Advocate forthe Stete/respodents. ORDER (Passed on 2"a July, 2007) The question of law involved is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scaie w.e.f. the date of initial appointment orfrom thedate ofcompletion of probation peribd. Indu 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the respondents/State jointly submit that the facte and question of law involved in the present writ petiSlon are the same to that of in W.P. (S) No.5976/20CB (Sushii Tiwari and others Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11.20CB. 3. In view of the above-stated submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the partie&.She writ petition is allowed in the same terms subject to verification ofthe facts. No order as to costs. • 1 „ ., SdA ;| • SatisiiK.Agnihotri 1 Judge 1