IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Ld) No. 1138 of 2008 Dattakumar Nivrutti Phad ..Petitioner vs. 1. The Nab Workshop foer the Blind the National Association for the blind (India) and ors. ..Respondents Mr.R.J.Ghag for petitioner. CORAM S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. 28th April, 2008 28th April, 2008 28th April, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The petition is directed against the interlocutory order. The petitioner does not dispute that even the earlier application for interim relief was rejected. In the second round, application was filed seeking restraint against the employer from taking any action on the basis of the findings of the enquiry officer. 2. For the reasons that are set out which are prima facie and did not conclude the controversy, the learned Member was right that this is not a fit case for grant of any interim relief. 3. The interlocutory order does not require any interference in the extra ordinary, discretionary and equitable jurisdiction of this Court, more so, when it is open for the petitioner to challenge the final orders if they are adverse to him. Further, all observations made by the Industrial Court are tentative and prima facie and, therefore, did not conclude the issue raised in the complaint. In the light of this additional clarification as well the writ petition need not be entertained. The petition is summarily dismissed. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)