IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.278 of 2005 NAWAL KISHORE SAH Versus THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS. ----------- 6. 21.1.2010. Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma, learned Junior Counsel to Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, learned counsel representing the Board. The petitioner had filed this writ petition for payment of his retiral benefits relatable to his father who had superannuated from the services of the Board from the post of Lineman with effect from 31.8.2001 and expired on 8.7.2004. The admitted position is that certain amounts towards group savings, arrear of pension, G.P.F, leave encashment and gratuity has been paid to the petitioner and it has been brought on record in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Board. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the calculation made towards the pension, G.P.F., leave encashment and gratuity is not correct as per his estimate. He further submits that in terms of the Board’s policy dated 17.11.2007 itself,, as mentioned in the counter affidavit, he was entitled for refund of 2 the amount deducted for the purpose of commutation of pension and the same has not been paid to him. He submits that the amount by reason of revised scale has also not been paid to him. Having regard to the nature of the pending grievance(s), this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to raise his grievances which according to him still remains pending, before the Secretary of the Board and who shall consider the same and if any amount is found payable to him against the post retiral benefits or any other dues, the same should be paid with admissible interest if any within a period of three months from the date such representation is filed. The writ petition stands disposed of with the directions aforesaid. ahk (Jyoti Saran,J.)