IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37745 of 2008 VINOD PRASAD S/O SHEO CHARAN MAHTO, R/O VILLAGE- LALA BHADSARA, P.S- DULHIN BAJAR, DISTRICT- PATNA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 19/11/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel representing the State and learned counsel for the informant. Initially a complaint case 126-C of 2008 was filed which was referred under section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. and then the FIR was registered under sections 323, 420, 406, 420, 467, 468 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that the petitioner obtained rupees three lacs for giving employment to three unemployed persons in Army. Rupees one lac was parted with each candidate. The petitioner has promised that his relative was in the Arm and he will procure the job. Submission is that the FIR of this case has been registered vide Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 44 of 2008 and prior to the present case Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 36 of 2008 was registered under section 364 A of the Indian Penal Code regarding kidnapping of Dharmendra Kumar the son of the petitioner. The kidnapped boy has given his statement under section 164 Cr.P.C. in which he has named the informant also. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant submitted that the kidnapping was alleged after filing of the present complaint case and prior to the FIR of Dulhir Bazar P.S. Case No. 36 of 2008. The petitioner has duped the informant and others. Further - 2 - submission is that the petitioner has criminal antecedent also. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Vinod Prasad is directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M., Danapur in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 44 of 2008. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)