1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4179 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.6124 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra ...APPLICANT. VERSUS Mohan s/o Dagadu More ...RESPONDENT. ... Mr.V.D. Rakh, A.G.P. for Applicants. ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4180 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.6121 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4181 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.6090 OF 2009 CORAM: K.U. CHANDWAL, J. DATE : 19TH DECEMBER, 2009. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned A.G.P. There is delay of 800 days in causing to file respective Appeals, it is sought to be condoned. Having gone through the details of the 2 Application, I find that though the Judgment is dated 25/4/2006, the prompt action as was expected is not taken. Even the court fee was not made available for preferring the Appeals. The delay being not sufficiently and properly explained cannot be condoned. 2. The learned A.G.P. also referred to the findings of the learned Reference Court and having gone through the same, I find that as against S.L.A.O. granting Rs. 3690/- per acre, the Reference Court has awarded Rs. 8100/- (Rs.400 per R) after deducting Rs.410/- and Rs. 15/-. It appears to be in tune to the record. The respective Applications and the Appeals dismissed. Necessary Court Fee be refunded. [K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] asb/DEC09/ca4179.09