WGH $OURT OF QHHATTE5€3 RH : BELAEPURE‘ m5, M ?E"E“ITIQNEF{§3 Writ Pe‘imm‘i {C} Na $5$8 0f 2W? AAbhvway gmkshan Samm (Feegd N044 dated 9404990) Pandit Nehru (Showk, Camp i, BhiEai, Tah. 93¢ Dig. Qurg (3%), thmugh Pre$ident. ViShwa. Bharai Wdyamy (Highef Semndary Schea!) UmtEtuiibn Code Naj32043‘}, Camp 1, Bmiai, Tah. & Dist. {)urg {SQ}, thmugh Wincipai. RE3PONDENTS Versas State 6f Chhattisgam, thmugh Principa§ Sesmary, $shca§ Edusatign Seisarimeni, Gwt. of Chhamsgam ' Maaframva, §K$ 3hawan Raipur {CG}. 2 $hhat§3garh Buard af $ecandary Edu5a€icn, €hmugh Sacreiary‘ {Director af Pubtic ms'tructian, Chhatiiésgarh, Raipw {CIE}. ) 4 {Eistricf EdLicatiGn Officex', Burg (<36. ‘ (Wrsi aetmen imdev Artéde 2‘26 0f the $on3titut§on 0f imia}: 3is3g§a $en¢3h : Ham’ble Sim $at§sh K. Agnihotré. J Present : $hr§ V3. Tamaskar, coun$e§ for the peiitioners. 3m Amk Bakshi, Govt. Advoca‘ie fa? the $tam SM RS. 9’ateL cwmei far ihe rewamdent NOE. ORLZ‘rER {AD BR A” {Passed an this 2§m éay cf Juiy. 26%) Hearé §eamed caunse? far km pames. g‘y ':h§3 ae‘tmon, the peiEiioners seek to chaiienge i‘ae Segwiiy am va§idi§y of ihe ordei" cmed 16-?~2OD7’ {Annexure — Pi?) passed by the Dis‘mzz‘t Edacaiicn Qi‘ficef, Dam, whefebv the rewgmiion 0f me petfzéenew £rzs%§‘mie has been came§§ed and se§éi§onar No.2;achmi L l was §§§esieci to issue transfer cemfiéates m ihe siuéems is} vamabie tham :0 win cthw $ch0'ms. Tm facks, m nutshe“, as vméected by the be'tmcmers, are tm‘z ihe peiiiéomr N63 sméety is a xvegistered society under ihe pmvisions Uté 0f the Madhya Pradesh/Chhatti$garh $0c§efg Registrikamfi Adhimyam, 1W3 (for Shari "fh$ Adhimyam, Q73} "‘s’he fewmdent No.2fChha‘itisgarh Beam 0f $eco‘ndary Educatim’a {fer 3mm “the responwnf No.2,!Eoam’§ grantati recognition io the peiitéa’nem t0 run ciasse$ up to c§a$5 XH m Higher Secondafy 539mm. A no£§ce dated 25 th $anuary, 2&5 {Annexure — PM) was issued b‘g ihe resmMent No.4lDis€rict Ezmcem'm Gi'ficer siatmg $3 {he peii’iione? No.2 schaol has mt pmduceci the rewwe documems in resgaect of the regaiar siudents and, as such, i'he petitiamer No.2 sshaoi has sommmed iwegukariiv in mamiainmg éhe damamenta. Thereaftar, a mmmunicat§0n da?ed 29m Awéi, 2395 {Anmexufe —- Pf5§y was a’ecehied fmm the office of Direciorate. ubiic ms’imcimms. bhmawsgarh. n x Gamma won we nemioa'iers tc P pmdace al§ me mcumems m :‘égard ta 5elected cam‘idates far baskei bad: competiticra. The aetitioner Na2 smcai submitted a r-egm e?‘ *he ‘Mm June 29% {Ammi’m — Pfa). Thereafter‘ er; the 1f Juiy, 20f)? (Annexme -— R3} the petiimner N92 schoo? was dehrecagnised by the respandem Nt).4/D§$tfici Edmaiim whey. i‘z wa$ further c£§rected Rf issue tramfer ceftificate3 m a§i the smdwis 5s that they can take adm§ssion5 in ether scheois. ’E‘hes, ’thie petit§on Shfi Tamaskar. £eamed coumei awearina for the netitieney. weuid submii thai the Disirict Education Officer, has no jmisdictmn to Camel the reeogn‘ition granted by the respondent NGZ’Boafd under the mowsians of the guard cf Secor‘derv Educe‘eon {Madhye PradeehiChhaii§sgam) Regwa’iims, 1985 {for Shari “fhe Reguiae‘ons, €965”). Learned csunse! womd fwfher submit thm the {eeeondent No.4;‘Disirict Educeiiom Offmei' ward at the most make a recommendation i0 the respondent No.2!30ard i0 take u, n.“ ... u s 13 d W apmspr§ate actiora, §f waged §rregu§a{iiies have beeia faund waved. Learned counsei woaid mext submii ihai the *I‘mdmgg fecwrded bv the Dismct £c§ucat§ow Gf?§cef wiih {eqaa‘d ta €3’feguiarity §s a§$o withcut any basis, a5 no spac$ura§iv sf hawim was affardeaé to tfxe peti§orie¥a Sm Pate§, ieamed caunsei appearmg f0? i‘ha re$pmdem Ma'a’KEoaw, wouéd submi that ihe impugned amer was pa$sed withou’i campiying wiih the pmvésions, 0f R$§U§aticns E36 & 67 of the Regma‘tions, 1965. No {esnonse has been fiiecé or: behah‘ of the State, however. $hri \ Baksm, Kearned Govt. Advocaie appeai’ing fer the Siaie, wcum submii iha‘c the Disirict Educa‘aon afficer is ob§iaed to maintam me ,edacetienei standard of ihe insiitutionischem, even if it is am unaEded echoet Learned counse! womd furthei’ submii mat cm enquiw it was feund that ihefe weie £0: of ser§oue irreguiariiies and, ae sush,'ihe emier dated w’h Juhg, W397 passed by the Dietmt Education <3§f§ter wee wet and proaer. i have heard ieamed counse! appearing far the pames, pemsed ihe e:eadinge and the dacuments appended therefo. Seciica 28 of the Chhattisgai’h Madhvamk Shiksha Ae’raimyam‘ W65 (far Shari “me zedhmiyem, $65”) enables i’ne respmdem’ No.2!530afc! to make reguia‘iione no: incaneistem wiih the provisions of ihe Acihimyem, 198’5 0? the mlee made ihereuriéef for matters, infer alia. the conéitmes {3f {ecegmtéee o? énsiétutmm fa; pumoses 0f eemission 10 the prMEegee of the Board, ihe quamcame and cemd§t§0fa of sewice of teachefs and fieming of a Schoo! Code to emeure a minimum standaid of eff§c§em and mifmm mamgement of such metiiuiions. The aveseondeni No.2} 80am an exefcise of its wowe¥ com'eri’ecé under ihe efevéeions ef . G1 ‘r. Chapter Xg of the Regwa‘iiom! 1965 éeaas with the appsintmem 0f recagmticn commmee by the Beam. Seciiara 54 0?" Reguiations. 19% mavides that n0 edmcatieaai insiimmn which is net recognized by ihe Board siiaii be permitted to nieeent camiid’atee for any examination canducieci ey the Boai'ci. $eciion 58 pi'ovities for inquiry. Seciibn 66 makes a pm’visien fer sabmissiow of a resort bv the Educa‘iionai Gificer. if helsi’ie is of iiie opinion that any educationai insiituiioi‘. recegi‘iizeci by ‘me Board has iw reasoo of deterioration ceased i0 meei i‘ne ”ine Secreiaiy, on i'eceint of remit, may institute such enqeiry es he thinks iii. The ieoogniiien committee shaii 'iake iinai decision in 4k u ie maites" Provisicns of Sections 82, 6% aed 83’ oi the Reguiaticne, i§§§ reads as undea‘ : {equiwments of we Beam, ta the $ea¥eiaw 0f 80am“ the “52. Ef ’ihe Board i5 sati$fied an emca‘tiona: matim‘tismai de3ewe3 resoamtion. ét shag dirent the Secretary ts enter iii; :aame in the iist 9f recegnizad insfim‘eiam ie b9, kept by his. This Secretary shai! éheregspen enmr the raama a? the insihiutim in the $a§§ iisi ané 'm’fei’m the educa€iona§ §nst§mt§sn and ma Educationai officef cancemed arid ihe Bkectc? about such recognmon. $ucfs communication shaii deariy skate the subjegi, m subjectrs, the period arid the examinatiaras ‘fw which and the candi’tiens subjexci to which sach iecognitien §5 granted. 6$. if We Educationa! Office? CGnCEi‘ned if 0f apénézm ‘$hat any edusaiiona§ insiituticm reccgnized by the Bcard baa: by reason of deterioration ‘ceasad ta meet ihe requirements of the Bcard, he shaH makes a {emri 0f me same to the $ecretarv. On rgceipt cf this report ihe Secreiaw may institute such enquiry as he think$ 71L The {apart of the enquiry Wm be submitteci ta the $eci§on 23 af ‘the Adhiniyam, 1965, §ramed the Regusmians, ‘1: ewgmtion Somméftee whiah wiii take it inm cansiderazicn at its, next meeting and mform éha saié insti'tutian of iis decisian ihmugé‘: the Educationa§ Officer somemeci, $1 m any case in which the Recegnitisn Cemmittee decides that action is naceswry upcr: the reperi, it wiii firs’: ca§i uperz 1km educationai §n5t§mti0n, through the Eciucamanai Offhzer concerned, is ismw cause why such 'actEon shomd no{ be taken” Under the provisions 6f Genemi Ciauses Act femgmtbn indua‘es de—recogniiisn ai'so. Once the Baard has granieé recagm’iicrx, we Board aizme can daqecognise the §nst§tute, on ’ihe hasis 9f aempaaint or an ihe basis ef ream submmed by the Qiwéct Educatbn Gfficea‘, after affomiing snpofmniiy of hemmg m accci‘dance wi‘ih éihe pmvisions 0f ihe Reausa’micm 88 & 5'7 9f ihe Reguiations, 1965. For the reasons mentioned hereinabwe, é‘i is we§3 estabEshed that the District Educaiiera Cfficei’ has mo §ua‘%sa’j§c§§m and §s mt camw‘tent i0 was such an Order, which amcuntS ta de-rewgnmen of ar: ura-aidec‘. mstiiu‘tiom. Ri agopears mat we [Estr‘ict Educaiion O§ficer has basses! the Empugned ordei“ w§theut examining the feievant provismns of iawi thus, has exceeded ks im‘isdiction. _ in tha resuit. the impugned a.de¢ daed ’i5‘h — wy, 2‘39? {Annexure - PW; is quashed and the iseiitmn is aHewea NO amer asio Gama. Hewevea', having regard to the facts simatmn of ihe caee, Eiberw is {eeewea to z‘esjeondems inciuding the State authemies i0 take appmpriate siepe against me eem‘icnefs! if se advised, in acccrdance with :aw. ' Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge A“ ('?)1