1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Criminal Application Nos.336 to 341 of 2007 In Criminal Application Nos.763 to 768 of 2007 Raju Bhandari Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & anr. Respondents None for the applicant. Ms.Pushpa Goswami for resp.no.1. Mr.P.A.Pol, APP for State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. August 8, 2007. P.C. . These are the applications praying for extension of time to deposit the amount. This Court on the basis of the undertaking furnished by the applicant had noted down his undertaking that he shall deposit an amount of Rs.4.50 lakhs in all the six cases within eight weeks from 16th April 2007, as noted in the order passed on that day and on the basis of this undertaking execution of the substantive sentence of imprisonment in all the six criminal cases bearing Nos.224/SS/2004 to 229/SS/2004 was stayed till 11th June 2007. . It is evident that the applicant has not maintained his statement and in fact there is a 2 reason to believe that he has taken advantage of the interim order passed on the basis of his statement. . Hence the applications are rejected. (B.H.MARL