IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8857 of 2010 ALAKH DUBEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 12.03.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner. No one appears on behalf of the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted under section 420 IPC. As per the allegation, a sum of Rs.50, 000/- is said to have been obtained by the present petitioner and a co- accused Om Prakash Rai on certain assurance. The said amount was not refunded to the informant. After a panchayati, a cheque for Rs. 40,000/- is said to have been issued favouring the informant by the co-accused Om Prakash Rai which subsequently bounced. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that liability shall be on the co-accused who is said to have issued the cheque. It is next contended that the present informant had earlier lodged a complaint case with identical allegation against the petitioner in which he has been released on bail. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner abovenamed, in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10, 000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Buxar in connection with - 2 - Mufassil P.S. Case No. 183 of 2009, subject to the condition that one of the bailors shall be his own/close family members. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )