IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1598 of 2010 BIPIN KUMAR SINHA . Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. . ----------- O3. 21.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State as also the Accountant General. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has not been complied with. Learned counsel for the State submits that on perusal of paragraph -6 of the writ application itself, it would appear that the grievance of the petitioner with regard to GPF has been paid with statutory interest till his retirement. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pay scale of the petitioner has not been correctly fixed as also the arrears on account of grant of time bound promotion has not been paid. Learned counsel for the State submits that on perusal of the representation, it would appear that the petitioner has not claimed with regard to the fixation of pay scale. In view of the above, since the order has been complied with, this contempt application need not proceed further and the same stands disposed of. However, petitioner will be at liberty to ventilate his grievance with regard to fixation of pay scale as also arrears on account of time bound promotion and also for interest, if permissible. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)