IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.16058 OF 2006 DATE OF DECISION: October 16, 2006 M.R. DAV College of Education ….Petitioner VERSUS The State of Haryana and others …..Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA PRESENT: Shri Rajiv Atma Ram, Senior Advocate with Shri Hemraj Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajai Gulati, AAG, Haryana for respondent No.1. Shri Balram K. Gupta, Senior Advocate with Shri Shireesh Gupta, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral). The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner has informed the Court that since the counselling for admission to B.Ed course was to be conducted by respondent No.3 University and the petitioner College has already been permitted to participate in the counselling process and even the admissions have taken place from the list of students supplied by respondent No.3, therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. CWP NO.16058 OF 2006 -2- However, if at any point of time in future any necessity arises, the petitioner College would be at liberty to approach this Court yet again. (Viney Mittal) Judge October 16, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla) KD Judge