IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Crl. Misc. No. M-4524 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:11.02.2011 Rajni and another .....Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. H.P.S. Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. AG, Punjab. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) Crl. Misc. No.8149 of 2010 Application is allowed as prayed for. Crl. Misc. No. M-4524 of 2010 The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C on behalf of the petitioners, namely, Rajni and Rakesh Kumar for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to ensure the protection of life and liberty of the petitioners as the marriage has been solemnised between the petitioners contrary to the wishes of their family members. Notice of motion was issued on 16.2.2010. In response thereto, reply has already been filed on behalf of the State, which is on record. Learned State Counsel, on the basis of reply, submits that inquiry was conducted by Inspector Darshan Singh and he recorded the statements of the petitioners and respondents No.5 and 6 wherein the petitioners have stated that they are not apprehending any threat at the instance of private respondents and private respondents have also stated that they have no objection to the marriage of the petitioners. Crl. Misc. No. M-4524 of 2010 (O&M) -2- In view of the statement made by the petitioners as well as private respondents, now there is no threat to the petitioners. No further action is required and the petition is disposed of accordingly. February 11, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE