1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.518 OF 2010 Mr. Shyam Bihari Sharma ...Applicant. v. The M.C.G.M. & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Bipin Joshi i/by Pratap F. Singh, advs., for the Applicant. Smt. K.K.Soran, adv. For the R.Nos.1 and 2. Mr.Prasad Bhattacharya-in-person-respondent no.3 present in Court. CORAM : J.H.Bhatia, J. DATE : 29th September, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant, who is the original plaintiff and the learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2 and the respondent no.3, Mr. Prasad Bhattacharya, who is present in person. 2 Plaintiff is son of one of the co-owners as well as tenant of the owners of the building. Plaintiff filed a suit against the Municipal Corporation restraining it from taking any action of demolition without following the due process of law. Respondent no.3, who was not a defendant to the suit took out chamber summons for being impleaded as a party. According to him, plaintiff was making construction on the 2 ground flour , which is going to affect his rights and also it may endanger the building, which may cause danger to the life and property of the respondent no.3 and his family members, who are living in the upper floor as tenants. Therefore, he wanted to intervene. The trial Court allowed the chamber summons. 3 After hearing the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances noted above, I see no reason to interfere in the impugned order. 4 Revision application stands dismissed. However, plaintiff is allowed to make amendment in the plaint to implead the respondent no.3 as defendant within two weeks from this date. (J.H.BHATIA, J.) 3