IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2018 OF 2009 (MS) Km. Rekha Rani (minor) Through her legal and natural guardian Balbir Singh. ………..Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and another. …….Respondents. Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand. Mr. N.S. Negi, Advocate for respondent no. 2. 30th November, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate for petitioner, Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand/respondent no.1 and Mr. N.S. Negi, Advocate for respondent no. 2. This petition is entirely misconceived! The petitioner has appeared in the Intermediate Examination 2009 and received 35, 57 and 68 marks in Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry respectively and consequently she was declared passed with Second Division. Since the petitioner was not satisfied with the marks received in the aforesaid papers, she applied for scrutiny. The papers were scrutinized and it was found that the marks given to the petitioner in the aforesaid subjects are in order. Now the petitioner has filed the present writ petition praying for revaluation of her papers by competent examiners. Respondent no. 2 is being represented before this Court by Mr. N.S. Negi, Advocate, who says that there is no provision for revaluation in these examinations and in 2 fact this controversy already stands settled with the case of Kamlesh Singh Rawat (Minor) Vs. Board of School Education, Uttarakhand, Ramnagar reported in 2009 (1) U.D.,486, where it has been held that interference by the Court as is being prayed for in the present case, cannot be done in a writ petition, particularly where there is no provision for revaluation. This matter stands covered with the judgment of Kamlesh Singh Rawat (supra). This writ petition has absolutely no merit and is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 30.11.2009 Rathour