IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2163 of 2008 BUNDELI SOCIETY & ORS Versus RAJESHWAR THAKUR@RAJENDRA THAKUR&ORS ----------- 2. 9.1.2009 Surendra/ Heard counsel for the petitioners. This Court would not find any jurisdictional error in the two impugned orders refusing injunction in favour of the petitioners. The lower appellate court in fact while affirming the finding of the trial court has given cogent reasons, none of which can be shaken either on fact or in law. Even otherwise the scope of interference by this court under section 115 C.P.C. against the concurrent finding of fact in the orders refusing injunction is well settled. Reference in this connection may be made to the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of the Managing Director (MIG) Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. Vs. Ajit Prasad Tarway, reported in AIR 1973 S.C. 76. That being the settled position of law, this Court would not find any merit in this application and accordingly, the same is hereby dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)