FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda ¦ of Coram, appearances, Court’s ¦ Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and ¦ Registrar’s orders ¦ ______________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------- C.A.NO.5199/2009 AND 5200/09 IN F.A.ST.NO.8933/2009. ----------------------------------- Shri S.G. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for the applicant. CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL,J. CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL,J. CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL,J. DATE : 09/06/2009 DATE : 09/06/2009 DATE : 09/06/2009 . Heard learned counsel for the appellant Insurance Company. There is delay of 193 days in causing to file appeal. Normally such delay if it is properly explained is condoned. However, in this matter the delay is not in that sense properly explained and that apart the liability of the Insurance Company has been restricted in the award under challenge. Considering this situation and considering the fact situation and as the delay is not properly explained the application is rejected. It follows the appeal is also rejected. Necessary refund is allowed. Civil Application for stay is rejected. The statutory deposit be remitted to the learned Member, MACT, Ambajogai. Dt.09/06/2009 (K.U.CHANDIWAL) (K.U.CHANDIWAL) (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE cmg/ca519909