IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10239 of 2010 VIKRAM KUMAR Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Rajesh Bhagat ------- 3/ 02.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and Mr. V.K. Singh, learned counsel for the complainant. Kidnapping by this petitioner of the complainant’s father is alleged which is denied on the ground that if really the case was of kidnapping, F.I.R. should be lodged immediately after the incident of kidnapping otherwise also petitioner was not aggrieved as sale-deed by complainant’s grand-mother executed in his favour. He was in possession of the same which was being challenged by one Saryu Sahani claiming that agreement to sell was existing in his favour and it appears that the complainant is favouring him and only to mount pressure, this case has been lodged. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 1312 of 2006 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., (West) Muzaffarpur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)