1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4401/2010 ANKUSH B. TARALE ..versus.. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-== Shri Y.P.Kaslikar, Counsel for petitioner. C ORAM : D.K.DESHMUKH AND R. K. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : 13 th SEPTEMBER, 2010 . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The appeal of the petitioner is still pending before the District Social Welfare Officer. It is for the District Social Welfare Officer to decide whether the appeal of the petitioner is maintainable. Unless and until the District Social Welfare Officer holds that the appeal is not maintainable, it cannot be said that the petitioner has a cause of action. The petition of the petitioner is premature, because the petitioner can still argue before the Appellate Authority that his appeal is maintainable. In these circumstances, Petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Rvjalit