@ HIGH CGUR‘T OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (227) N0. 3744 0i'2008~ E’ETITIONER Narsinghnath SiilhEg Sfo Jhadiram Sinha, aged about 38 years, R/o viHage JamgaOn, B10ck. Fingeshwar, Tah’ Rajim, Distt. Raipur (CG) VERSUS i EES?§)NDENTS 1. Stata of Chhattisgaih, Thmugh ; Joint Registrar Co- operative $ocieties, Raipur DiStt. Raipur (CG), 2. Parasram Sahu, Member of the Vrihtakar Sahaliari $amiti Lachkei‘a Block Fingeshwar, Distt. Raipur (CG). 3. Chairman, Vrihatkar Seva Sahkari Sami‘m Maryadit Lachkora Rag. N0. $94 Block, Fingeshwar, Distt. Raipur (CG). (WRH‘ PETI'KON UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF 'H-IE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'bk Mr. Satish K. Agaajhotri, J.) ?resent : Shri LC. Das, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Rajeodra Agi‘awal, Pane; Lawyei“ for the State. ORAL ORDER (Pamd en this 15‘ aay amugmt, 2908) 1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing {Emily Learned counsel appearirrg for the petitioner submitg that in View of the subsequent devetopmerit, the petitioner wants to file a review petition before the Registrar, Co—operative Societies. He further submits that the delay caused on account of pendency ofthis petition may be condoneé. 3. It is ordered accordingiy. In the event, review petitioo is field within a period oftwo weeks, there may not be a question ofdelay. 4. in view of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of with the above stated iibeitv. No order as to costs. 5v Consequently, LA. No. 01/08, application for grant of stay, also stands disposed of. ‘ Sd/. Satish K‘, Agnihotri . Q Sahu @dge