IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN THURSDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2011 / 12TH JYAISHTA 1933 RP.No. 352 of 2011 -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN TPC.7/2011 Dated 06/04/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- GEETHA, W/O.VENUGOPALAN, CHUNDOLY PADIKALEYA PARAMBIL HOUSE, P.O.KIZHOOR, PANAMANNA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT NOW RESIDING AT RAMASADANAM, 4/222 IST MILE STONE, P.O.THOTTAKKARA, OTTAPALAM - 679 102. BY ADV. SRI.P.JAYARAM RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------- P.VENUGOPALAN, S/O.BHASKARA KURUP, HOUSE NO.VI/1313, THOPPUMPADY P.O., ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 005. BY ADV. SRI. V.SETHUNATH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ----------------------------------- RP No. 352 of 2011 in Tr.P(C) No.7 of 2011 ------------ ----------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of June, 2011 O R D E R The review petition is filed by the Petitioner in TP(C) No.7 of 2011 to review the order dated 06.04.2011. In the Transfer Petition, the petitioner sought transfer of the case pending before the Family Court, Ernakulam to the Family Court, Palakkad. The prayer was rejected on the ground that the petitioner is settled in Hyderabad and the respondent is working in Gujarat. It was held that even if the case is not transferred to Palakkad, no prejudice or inconvenience would be caused to the petitioner. 2. In the Review Petition, it is stated that on and from 02.03.2011, the petitioner and her parents are residing at Ottapalam, they having shifted from Hyderabad. The Transfer Petition was filed on 05.01.2011 and it was disposed of on 06.04.2011. Before the disposal of the Transfer Petition, the petitioner shifted her residence to Ottapalam. However, it is stated that this fact could not be brought to the notice of this RP No. 352 of 2011 2 court while disposing of the Transfer Petition. 3. The learned Counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that it is true that the petitioner shifted her residence from Hyderabad to Ottapalam. 4. It is submitted by the learned Counsel appearing for the parties that the parties have agreed to file a joint application under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act before the Family Court. The respondent has no objection in allowing the Transfer Petition. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the Review Petition is allowed. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE. kkj