1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9670 OF 2009 Yashoda Baburao Tangsale & Anr. .. Petitioners. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.Pramod Kathane for the petitioners. Mrs.P.S.Cardozo A.G.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE, J. DATED : 19TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition arises from the orders passed by revenue authorities in the RTS proceedings. Admittedly, there is a suit bearing civil suit No.19 of 2001 pending before the Civil Court at Karad. The suit is filed by the petitioners for partition and separate possession of their share in the suit properties. In view thereof and in view of the order I propose to pass I am not recording detail reasons. Learned counsel for the petitioners has fairly agreed for the following order: The Civil Court at Karad shall decide the aforementioned suit filed by the petitioners on merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the observations made in these proceedings by the revenue authorities. It is open to the petitioners to 2 approach the revenue authorities afresh for effecting necessary changes in the record of rights after the suit is finally decided and the rights of the parties are crystalised. It is made clear that mutuation entry in dispute will be subject to outcome of the civil suit pending between the parties. With these observations the writ petition is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)