IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.19465 of 2011 1. Sangita Devi wife of Basudeo Sah, 2. Radhika Devi wife of Late Raghubir Sah, & 3. Basudeo Sah son of late Raghubir Sah …Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar …OP ----------- 3/ 28.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners are the sister-in-law, mother-in-law and brother-in-law respectively of the deceased and in their regard final report was submitted on 30.09.2010, but disagreeing with the same cognizance was taken on 26.11.2010. When the petitioners made a prayer for anticipatory bail before the court below, it was observed by it that the petitioners had no apprehension of arrest since final report had been submitted in the matter disregarding the fact that cognizance has been taken about eight months earlier. Considering the fact that final report was submitted with regard to the petitioners, it is ordered that in the event of surrender of the petitioners, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in connection with Bairia P.S. Case No.151 of 2010, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C., and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving 2 genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)