... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3366 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3366 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3366 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant Versus Bharat Vasant Survase & Others ...Respondents Shri A.S.Shitole, A.P.P for the Applicant. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : DECEMBER 13, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 13, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 13, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned A.P.P for the State. The acquittal of the Respondents is for offences punishable under section 323, 324, 504, 506 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. The perusal of the impugned Judgment and Order shows that the complainant (P.W.1) made improvements in the prosecution case while deposing before the court. The learned Trial Judge after scrutiny of the evidence of all eye-witnesses has found their evidence contradictory and inconsistent. The view taken by the learned Trial Judge is a possible view. No case is made out for grant of leave. Application is rejected. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE