1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR ORDER S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 6626/2009 Kampotar vs. State of Rajasthan Dated : 04.09.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor for the State. This order governs the disposal of bail application filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. by Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg Advocate on behalf of the applicant Kampotar pertaining to F.I.R. No. 112/2002 of police station Sadar, Dholpur in the offences 386 and 341 of IPC. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has canvassed that the occurrence of this case is alleged to have taken place on 10.5.2002. The police after completion of investigation has filed the charge-sheet in the court against the accused Bahadur Singh and the investigation was kept pending against him under Section 173(8) of Cr.P.C. Since then, no evidence has been collected and the petitioner apprehends his arrest to be made by the police, hence, he may be granted indulgence of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has fairly conceded that no evidence has emerged against the petitioner on record. 5. Having considered the submissions made at the bar and perused the relevant material available on record, I, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, feel that it 2 is a fit case wherein petitioners can be granted anticipatory bail and the bail petition is ordered to be allowed. 6. Therefore, the SHO/I.O. Of the Police Station Sadar, Dholpur is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Kampotar S/o. Harvilas in FIR No. 112/2002 registered in the offences under Sections 386 and 341 of IPC, he shall enlarge him on bail provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.2,000/- with a surety bond in the like amount, to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i) He shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required: (ii)He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii)He shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. (iv)He will not commit any offence during the period of bail. (MAHESH BHAGWATI), J. Mak/- 21