The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.24496 of 2010 Date: 01-10-2010 Between: Konduru Seshamma and 5 others ..... Petitioners AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh and 2 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Mr.P.Gangarami Reddy Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Revenue Order: The petitioners claimed to have been assigned certain lands in Survey Nos.402/2, 402/3, 403/1, 403/2, 403/4, 404/2 and 404/3, situated at Chiyyavaram Village, Thottambedu Mandal, by way of DKT pattas in the year 1992. Respondent No.3 issued notices, dated 16-07-2010, to the petitioners calling upon them to appear before him on 22-07-2010 and showcause as to why they should not be evicted from the land covered by Survey No.163 of Chemuru Village, Thottambedu Mandal, Tirupathi Division, Chittoor District, which was classified as Chemuru Chintalacheruvu @ Chemuru Pedda Cheruvu. The petitioners are stated to have submitted their explanations thereto by mentioning that they are not in possession of any part of the land in Survey No.163 and that their possession is confined only to the lands covered by DKT pattas, comprised in the above-mentioned survey numbers. The grievance of the petitioners is that while no order has been passed so far by respondent No.3, efforts are being made by his subordinates to dispossess them from the lands covered by DKT pattas. I have heard Sri P.Gangarami Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioners, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignments) representing the respondents. If the facts pleaded by the petitioners viz., that they are not in possession of any part of the land in Survey No.163, which was classified as a tank, and that their possession is confined only to the lands covered by DKT pattas, are true, the question of respondent No.3 evicting them from the land covered by Survey No.163 does not arise. As the petitioners claimed that they have submitted their explanations to notices, dated 16-07-2010, issued by respondent No.3, he shall pass appropriate orders, after considering the same. If respondent No.3 finds that the petitioners are not in occupation of any part of the land comprised in Survey No.163, he shall not interfere with the petitioners’ possession in respect of the lands covered by DKT pattas, comprised in the Survey Numbers referred to above other than Survey No.163. Conversely, if it is found that the petitioners are in possession of any part of the land in Survey No.163, respondent No.3 shall be free to pass appropriate orders and take action for their eviction therefrom. Subject to the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.31357 of 2010, filed by the petitioners for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 1st October, 2010 lur