1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 741 OF 2004 Mrs.Subhadrabai Krishna Pardeshi..... Appellant versus Pune Municipal Corporation & two ors.... Respondents Mr. V.G. Peshave for the Appellant Mr. Y.R. Shah for respondents. CORAM: R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 08th OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Peshave learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Shah for the respondents. The second appeal is filed by the original plaintiff. Suit was filed for injunction restraining the respondent nos. 1 to 3 from amalgamating City Survey Nos. 97 and 98 situated at Ganesh Peth, Pune, and for consequential injunction against respondent no.1 from sanctioning amalgamation to building plan of City Survey Nos. 97 and 98. It was the case of the original plaintiff that the respondent nos.2 and 3 in collusion with the respondent no.1 amalgamated her property CTS no. 97 with the adjoining CTS no.98 without her consent, with the help of forged thumb impression. The trial court found that on the date of the filing of suit almost entire construction work was completed except some minor works, like 2 plastering, drainage, water connection etc. which was also completed during pendency of the suit. Both the courts below held that the plaintiff could not lead any evidence to prove that amalgamation of properties CTS Nos. 97 and 98 was either in collusion with respondent nos. 2 and 3 or with the respondent no.1. The lower courts further held that the original plaintiff failed to prove that there was consent for the above said amalgamation. The above findings are recorded after appreciating the evidence on record. No error is pointed out to the court so as to enable the court to interfere in exercise of jurisdiction under section 100 of C.P.C. No question of law much less substantial question of is involved in the second appeal and hence second appeal is dismissed. (R.V. More, J.)