!:^l.l 13 •^. '• ^ i/€fe&^< "X^^^.K^^? ^z^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR(C.G.l Wnt Petition Na _^S^_/2005 Petitioners •^ €-::i ^'.. ^- /" ^••(y. ,^^<2. ^.••r'' ,-^ ^>-'"'" .^ ^' Respondents /../ ^^ :^1. /- 2. y 4^^' -J^'7 .^> ^3. /4. <^ '&y Ashwani Kumar Sharma, Son of Shri Ram Khilawan Sharma, Age 42 years, Assistant Teacher, Posted at Govt. Primary School, Khairbanakala, Block Bodla, Education District Kawardha (Chhattisgarh). Bhole Prasad Vishwakarma, Son of Late Shri Durga Prasad Vishwakarma, Age 50 years, Assistant Teacher, Middle School Maharajpur, Block Bodla, District Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh. Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Director, Public Instructions, Pension Bada, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. District Education Officer, District Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh. Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Khairbanakala, District Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh. 6V WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ';::-::x- ..<^ S«(iei.Efl lW^^ HOWBlSNfcSOTISM^aeilt^^ PeBticners WRlTPETlTK»111ilO.B lOF2<»* V£.SatoiTW «idgth8re vg@ys RwBomtorts : Thsaaittfrt^lihaMsgarhamlothMs PaBUmKBrs : versua R^Boindentk : Ste^cfChhrtSsguhandoU'ww wiw rmONiii©.i6woFaw PirtiUonws : <teiisinghFtethore<n*»iotttBr '•. . 'vaisus.'- - FtosBOnduitB : StateflfGhUflisgurhaidothws Patifenere ^aae^asSa wraTprrmCTiNOA3^0F28W AshwantKunT^amwandaneither StateorGWtwUsBartiandothws 1OTUTPETITl6»llOA4atOK2ftM VX.RriuwKthWB TO18US ', . , ' -RrtMiondwita."':' ;. : StatoofGhhaUsgMhantfottws PetiUoriere RannshaitfMTYadwanaanoBter vetsus Respondtots : Siat»^CNialB^irttaK»®th<ws PetiBoneis RaspdmliBnts WRrrpETni& N©A»itW^ft i: ant.iftmitaTntatlrtamtoBiws TOtSUS : Sttt»<tfChh1tis(pwftancfeothers wraTpErrnt»iNQ3B2«oF»(» PeUtterwus : J^(BndrKSii<|h rilwwimdw^hw TOreus ...,. ;, : , - . SlateofChhatBsgathanctuthere RBSDotKtonlr vwOTprrmoNNtMBQEawft now Dlllhiiar veraus andanothw '^^: tS#: Prewitt : W.AnuiaBSHilw^lawE^II^.Ha^da^^ AnujMffi^tilsie^ l^ ^y SUrtwartiaw an^ Bta^car ni)^»tii,coure8lfor1hepefitrenei^. ^4r. WwiSao.GoveinmentAclTOtatBtorthBStal^ respondwits. 0^BSed on 10" afNowember,20BG) THe petiBwiei^ an im^nt as Ifl^^ MEsteriUpper ©iVisiOT TeBdw^Assfelant TBaGhw ht ©<wwnmwlt Scheots/SclwotEdUcstfi^Depatmwil^hithBcoinsfcctftl^swvtGe as Lactureirt-towt MtBlwftJpper Dhtefen Teachw/Assislmt Teachw, 1hs peBUonBrs hinw otetfnect fi£dMT.l^CertUtertM rt Bieir cwm expwiws baforel-3-1899. 2. Thaprewntbatt^^witpe^toirearobdtV^llqiosedof bytttfecwmtwnWctelBthBlBffitsaiKtquesUowoftawmvrt^m^ prtBiens are^Cotnnron. 3. Accwclmff to Iwnrart c»fl»Nte^ t^^^^ 1he petithm^ w«enWI^ te t«ro alvancs 1^^ (tocfeienofttitsCouttinftieGasefrfYiB^wantKtffliwBhan^^ MUhi(^GB»ponaflb%D(^<»^ the Tei^ars.haring obhnmKtB£d.,M.Ed.,B.T.I. GartffiGatas.at tteh- oOTia<pw»es,aF»Gowere(ttqr^l»®sd«cute'ttrt«t^4-t2-1988K»iwdhy IheStetBGovemmentofMadhyaPrad^t. 4. Furthe^ ihlhe fliattor ^SBAAfaflbw»»Sl>m«stm»ws. Sfai(»<rfMR.<mrf«®»^,tl^ifaKng^P^^ GvirtiOTflentih^i^lecensicto^tfte^ret^cta^l.^ is provlded that ttie Assistant Teachers.who have acquired B.Ed. Degree at Iheir own cost batwsen 23-10-1964 and 7-5-1973 shaB be entStled to two advanc®incremente, reliad on decision in ttw case of Rakesh Kumar Shrivaslma vs. Slate of M.P. ancfofhws passed in OriginalApplteation No.1632 of 1999, daaded on 12-10-1999, wherem B is (Aserved Itiat the cireutardatod 1-3-1999 cannat be made applicableretrospecUvely. Thus.a Teacher, nay be Assistant Teacher, who has obtainal B.Ed. Degres befbre t-3-1999 is enBUed to two advanca increments. •^ 5. It te pointBdout by leamed counselappearir^ for the petittonere that the than Stato of Madhya Pradesh had flled a Spwtal Leave PeBtion against the orders passed by the Tribianal and ths Hon'bte Supreme Court dismissed Spectail Leave PeBtion No.1999 of 2000 filed swiinst the orderof ths Tribunal. Therefore, the direction to the effect that tbe cireular dated 1-3-1M9 cannot be made applteabto retro^ecBvely, passed toy the Tribunal, becomes flnal and Vhe same shall be ap(riicabte to atl the Assistant Teachers. who hava obtained B.EdJB.T.I. eertificsrtesbefore 1-3-1999. It is further substanUated by a dreulardated 17-10-2003 issusd by th8 present State of Machya Pradesh, wherein the circular cleaity statss about tta deciston of the Hon'bte Supreme Court. 6. Leamed counsel appearing for the pelittoners furthw submlls ftat the facts and qiwstion of law invotved in ihe presant cases are squardy covered t>y the decislon of this Q»urt In the case of Yashwmit Kwnar Bhamdvwi (Supra). to which Iwrrwl counsel appearing fbr the Statafrespondents feurty concedes and agrees with the averments made t^ teamedeounsel appearingft>rthe prtHtonere. 7. In some of the cases, onthe basis of obtainmg B.Ed^B.T.I. CertNteatm, the peUBoners wero gramted two advance increments, but, later on, fce|»ymwrtoftwo advanee Incrementswas stDpped. Since the pdffionere are OTitiUed to two adwmce mcrements, the order stopping the payment of two sKlvance increments as weU as recoveryofthesaidamountisbadandthepetitionerear'eentitledfaittie benefit of two advance increments from ttie date they hawe passed B.Ed./B.T.I. Examinatfons. 8. AGCorelingly, th»writpefflions areallowed hi tBrms of tha decis'ion of this Court In the matter of Ya^mmnt Kumar Bhaiadwaj (Supra), subject to verificaUon of tte fact as to whether tte peUMonsrs havs acquired B.Ed./B.T.t. GerUficates at (helr own e)g>enses as perthe circulare datad 24-12-1998anct 1-3-1999 and lurtherwhethertheyhave bron paidtwoadvanceincrementsornot Noorderastocosts. 9. A c<^»yof this order be ptaced on the record of the connected writ petittons. Satish K.Agnihotri Judge 1 200e(tl)MPJR-CG98 2 2000 Cl) M.P.L.&R. 136 aopu