IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34568 of 2010 BRIJ BIHARI PANDEY & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 15.11.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioners, namely, Brij Bihari Pandey and Savitri Devi, apprehends their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.526/10 registered under sections 420,406,467,468,471,323,370 and 504 of the I.P.C. Originally the informant filed complaint case which was converted into police case and allegedly, petitioners executed sale deed on 22.7.1987 in respect of khata no.9 which belongs to other persons. Learned counsel for the petitioners points out that the petitioners filed a petition before the learned Sessions Judge mentioning this fact that in place of khata no.2, khata no.9 was inadvertently written in the sale deed and now the petitioner is ready to take step for making correction in the aforesaid sale deed. It appears from perusal of the record that earlier the petitioners withdrew their anticipatory bail petition before the 2 learned Sessions Judge and they again filed anticipatory bail petition which was too dismissed with observation that the same was not maintainable. Even if prosecution story assumed to be true, then, also it is a case of civil nature. In the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within 30 days from the date of communication of this order to the concerned court in connection with Thawe P.S. Case No.26/10 arising out of Complaint Case No.526/10, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gopalganj, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. Anilkr.sinha (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)