IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28836 of 2010 Smt. Sushma Kumari Versus State Of Bihar & Anr ----------- 7 15.09.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the opposite party no.2. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 submits that appropriate amount for maintenance of the petitioner as also the son was deposited in the joint account with the petitioner, however, during the pendency of the case, the said amount was withdrawn and deposited in the personal account of the petitioner totaling to the tune of Rs. 34,500/-. Learned counsel further submits that in a proceeding for maintenance filed by the petitioner a sum of Rs. 5500/- has been directed to be paid to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also says that the aforesaid amount has been directed to be paid to the petitioner per month, and as such, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing this application for the present. In view of the above, the application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)