1 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3650 OF 2008 Jasmin Harkishan Zaveri .. Applicant Versus Prabhusingh Walia & Anr. .. Respondents. And The State of Maharashtra ...Complainant ... Mr. S.A. Jabbar i/b K.C. Pandey, for the applicant. Mr. S.V. Marwadi i/b M.D. Mali, for Respondent No.1. Mr. K.v. Saste, APP for the State. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATED : 8th March 2010 P.C. 1. By this application, the applicant challenges the anticipatory bail order dated 8.5.2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge of Gr. Mumbai in Criminal Application No.568 of 2008 2. Paragraph no.3 of the impugned order thus reads: “this order shall remain in force for a period of 15 days from the date of filing of chargesheet and if an application for regular bail is made during the said period, until same is decided”. 2 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the charge sheet has been filed on 16.2.2010. The application for bail made by the respondents has been rejected by the learned Magistrate by an order dated 5.3.2010. In view of this, the period of validity of the impugned order dated 8.5.2008 has expired. Challenge to the said order is merely academic and therefore I decline to interference. The application is disposed of. (D.G. KARNIK,J.)