IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.17001 of 2010 Date of Decision : September 21, 2010. Sandeep Kumar .....Petitioner versus Additional Deputy Commissioner-cum-Marriage Officer, Ludhiana. .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.S.S.Rangi, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.H.S.Brar, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter-reply from the respondent at this stage. The petitioner is said to have performed an inter-caste marriage with Manjot Kaur. It is averred that though the petitioner and Manjot Kaur both are fully eligible to perform the marriage, nevertheless the respondent has not registered their marriage due to certain objections filed by an uncle of Manjot Kaur. It is further averred that the petitioner's C.W.P.No .17001 of 2010 2 wife has gone to U.S.A. on 8.9.2010 to keep intact the green card already issued to her. The petitioner submits that his wife is ready and willing to come again to India as and when required for the purpose of registration of their marriage. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to the respondent that subject to verification of the facts, if so required under the law, the necessary marriage certificate shall be issued forthwith to the petitioner and his wife-Manjot Kaur as and when both appear before the respondent. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. September 21, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE