IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51272 of 2008 SURYADEO YADAV, S/o Bineshwar Yadav, R/O Village Madanchak, P.S. Bind, District - Nalanda Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.579 of 2009 UDAY KUMAR @ UDAY MAHTO, S/o late Kailash Mahto, resident of village Isanager P.S. Goshwari, District - Patna Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.01.2009 Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners and Sri Dasrath Mehta, APP for the State. The trail of criminal antecedent is what has influenced the mind of learned Additional Sessions Judge in refusing the prayer for bail of the petitioner Suryadeo Yadav. As regards petitioner Uday Kumar @ Uday Mahto, his prayer was earlier dismissed by the order contained in Annexure – 1/1 because he was named by the victim of the offence. Considering the very material against Uday Kumar @ Uday Mahto, his prayer for bail is dismissed again. As regards that of Suryadeo Yadav, this court is not influenced by the trail of his antecedent in absence of any substantial material, let him be released from custody on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two - 2 - sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 320 of 2005. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)