WP(C) 6900/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE T.NK SINGH Heard Mr.S.U.Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner and also Mr.P.Roy, lea rned senior GA appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. In the present writ petition, it is alleged that the eviction no tice dated 13.06.2000 in connection with encroachment case No.4 of 2000 was issu ed by the Addl.D.C., Kamrup, Amingaon to the writ petitioner. But in the writ pe tition, not even a copy of the said eviction notice dated 13.06.2000 is annexed and also no copy of any order passed in the said encroachment case No.4 of 2000 is annexed. In the absence of any material documents, it would be very diffi cult on the part of this court to come to a prima facie finding that there was a n eviction case against the present writ petitioner. The only copy of order anne xed in the present writ petition is the order of the Assam Board of Revenue, Guw ahati dated 04.01.2010 passed in Revenue Case No.63 RA (K)/2000 wherein it is ob served that fresh notice shall be issued to the appellant i.e. the present writ petitioner as per law if so advised. When this court put a pointed question to Mr.Mazumdar, learned c ounsel for the petitioner as to whether the State authority had issued fresh evi ction notice to the present petitioner, the answer of Mr.Mazumdar is that the pe titioner has apprehension that he may be evicted without any notice. It is well settled law that the writ petition cannot be filed me rely on apprehension, but considering the peculiar nature of this case, this wri t petition is disposed of with the direction that the Addl. D.C, Kamrup, Amingao n may, if at all necessary, eviction process can be started only after giving du e notice to the present petitioner and also by following due process of law. With the above observation and direction, the writ petition is d isposed of. However, petitioner may approach this Court if he is aggrieved b y the order of the concerned authority for eviction.