IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21099 of 2011 ====================================================== Durgesh Kumar & Ors .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prahlad Kr. Bhagat Gp13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA) 2 20-12-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners claim to be an applicant under advertisement No.2/09 for the post of Constable. The contention is that they passed the written test and they qualified in the physical test, but appointment was being denied. There is no discussion in the writ petition that any person with lesser qualifications and marks than the petitioners has been appointed. The Court finds it difficult to start a roving enquiry at their behest. If so advised, the petitioner may represent before the authorities and if they are able to invite the attention of the respondents that persons possessing lower qualifications and/or with lesser marks have been appointed, let the respondents dispose off their representation by a reasoned Patna High Court CWJC No.21099 of 2011 (2) dt.20-12-2011 2 and speaking order in accordance with law. The writ application stands disposed. Krishna Chandra Jha/- (Navin Sinha, J)