IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. 5517 of 2010 (O&M) Arpit Projects Limited ... Appellant vs Gurgaon Recreation Park Ltd. and another ... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. R. K. Anand, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Vikas Behl, Advocate, for the respondents. Rajesh Bindal, J. The appellant, who is party to a memorandum of understanding entered into with the respondents, has filed the present appeal against the order passed by the learned District Judge, Gurgaon, whereby in an application filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, interim stay regarding eliniation or transfer of possession of the suit property to the extent of the share of the respondents, was granted till 27.10.2010, the date on which a petition filed by the present appellant for appointment of Arbitrator was fixed in this court. It is admitted that this court had appointed an Arbitrator vide order dated 7.12.2010 with a direction to conclude the arbitration proceedings within a period of six months from the first date of hearing, namely, 11.2.2011. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions from Mr. R. Dayal, Legal Advisor, fairly stated that the respondents are not going to dispose of their share of property in dispute till the disposal of the arbitration proceedings. The aforesaid statement made on behalf of the respondents satisfies the claim of the appellant. Accordingly, it is directed that the interim stay already granted by this court shall continue till the conclusion of the arbitration proceedings. The appeal stands disposed of. 31.1.2011 (Rajesh Bindal) vs Judge