IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.4967 of 2009 (O&M) Decided on : 01.09.2009 Hari Singh ... Petitioner versus Banta Singh & others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. O.P.Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) The petitioner had filed a suit for specific performance. Along with the suit, he filed an application under Order 39 Rule 1 for temporary injunction restraining the respondents No.1 to 3 (alleged subsequent vendees) from further alienating the property in dispute. In the said injunction the application was allowed. However, in appeal the learned Appellate Court relying upon the principles of lis pendens set aside the injunction. After hearing counsel for the petitioner this petition is disposed of with the modification that in case the property in dispute is further alienated any such contract would have to bear a stipulation that the said alienation would abide by the judgment of the present suit. Consequently, this revision petition is disposed of. September 01, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE