IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.29042-M of 2010 Date of Decision:13.1.2011 Manjinder Kaur and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. S.S. Chadha, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. Sukant Gupta, Advocate for U.T. Chandigarh. Mr. K.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the private respondents. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 6 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners and also directing respondents No.7 to 11 not to interfere in the personal lives of the petitioners. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.7 to 11 submits that he has instructions to state that they have disowned petitioner No.1 and they will not interfere in the personal lives of the petitioners. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for respondents No.7 to 11, the present petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. However, in view of the interim direction passed by this Court vide order dated 30.9.2010, the official respondents are directed to review the threat perception and take appropriate measure in accordance with law, if need be. 13.1.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE