^ pf^ 1N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, W.P. No. )Slf<?(<0F 2001 PETITIONER ,^s^ l..^^^' ^:^y ^"'^ ~'<?~:>c'1 ^^ -c Q6y' RESPOHDEHT Shri Gurbachan singh sahota aged about 67 years S/0 Late Sardar Nazer Singh Sahota R/0 UDALPUR^ Tehsil-Ghargora District Raigargh At present residing at Village -Kudri Tehsil -•Sohaqpur District-Shahdol VERSUS ^- ^ Shri K.C.Das The Sub Divisional Officer Ghargora At present Sub Divisional Officer Kharsia District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ^'...... ^:.-...^"t^- VSKS.7 PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUACE OF ^RIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER ^RIT/DIRECTIOH _PA£TT^>y-LI-ZL-I:>cl-'''^T;l--t'n"t' e -^^.^ K- •STftfE OP,.GtilSAlCrfS.8N^: THROUO^ I»RX»C33PA&SfiCRBTAaY. DSPAR1MBNT QV RSVSN^^ D.K.S. BmWAN.BAXPUR (C.G.) ^'^ ""^. •v^^ l/ ^' H' 1-^-??®^ t li ^i^-^ | V j^ ^JJ^^ / HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B: Hoyi9ble Shri Prashant Kiunar Mishra Writ Petition No. 1548/2001 PETITIONER : RESPONDENTS Shri Gurbachan Singh Versus Shri K.C. Das and another Appearance: Shri SC Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Bhavesh Acharya, counsel for respondent No. 1. Shri Ajay Dvvivedi, Dy.G.A. for respondentNo.2. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTFTUTION OF INDIA ORAL ORDER (24.11.2010) ^^ Proceedings under section 240-241 ofthe C.G. Land Revenue Code were initiated against the petitioner and fine of Rs.1000/- was imposed by the Sub Divisional Officer. In the appeal preferred by the petitioner, the said order was set aside. According to the petitioner the respondent No.l initiated the proceedings in malafide manner to harass the petitioner, hence this petition has been prefen'ed for taking suitable action against respondent No. 1 for registration offalse case and to compensate the petitioner. (2) In the opinion of this court, the appropriate remedy for the petitioner, to claim such reliefis the jurisdictional civil court because the issue regarding malice infact and the damages, if any, are disputed question of fact which can only be gone into in a duly /-ebnstituted civil suit. ^^ ^ (3) In view ofthe above, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner that if he so desires, he may prefer a civil suit for redressal ofhis grievances. (4) Writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge t\^ U|.