IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1072 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1072 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1072 OF 2006 Hemangi C. Prabhu & 44 ors. ] ..Petitioners Vs. 1. Air India Ltd. & 8 ors. ] ..Respondents Ms. Hutoxi Tavadia with Mr. M.M. Thorat for the petitioners. Mr. S.K. Talsania, senior counsel with Mr. J. Saluja i/b M.V. Kini & Co. for respondent No.1. Mr. Y.R. Mishra with N.D. Sharma for respondent No.2. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 27TH APRIL, 2006 P.C. . After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, it appears that the contention of the petitioners is that they are in fact direct employees of respondent No.1 and that respondents No.6 and 8 are sham or bogus contractors. It is their case that they should be directly appointed with respondent No.1. It is not possible for this Court, in exercise of its extra ordinary jurisdiction, to grant the relief as prayed for by the petitioners. If the petitioners are aggrieved, it will be for them to take up the matter in conciliation and if the Conciliation Officer sends a : 2 : failure report if satisfied, to the appropriate Government and for the appropriate Government to take decision thereafter. If the petitioners raise the matter in conciliation, the Conciliation Officer is directed to dispose of the same expeditiously in accordance with law. 2. With the above directions, Petition disposed of. Sd/- [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]