MC 80/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Talukdar, learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. SK Talukdar, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Mr. Soren, learned counsel for the respondents. The applicants, who claim to be selected by the Gram Sabha and whose nam es are forwarded by the BDO vide communication dated 28.4.2010 to the Project, D RDA, by the present petition, are praying for impleading them as party responden t Nos. 7 to 39 in the connected writ petition. The petitioner has challenged the communication dated 28.4.2010 issued b y the BDO to the Project Director, DRDA forwarded therewith the list, which acco rding to the petitioner has been prepared by the BDO and not by the Gram Sabha. The present application has been filed by the persons whose names are in cluded in the list prepared on 28.4.2010 forwarded by the BDO to the Project Dir ector, DRDA. In view of the above, in my considered opinion, the applicants are neces sary parties in the writ petition and hence the prayer for impleadment are allow ed. The applicants are impleaded as respondent Nos. 7 to 39. The learned counsel for the petitioner shall furnish copies of the writ petition on the respondent Nos. 7 to 39 during the course of the day. Misc. Case stands dispose of.