5)<- (? ^ '-^^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ^. ATBILASPUR W. PJC) No. B^6'1~ /2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS .^B ^y >-$J^ ^/^ ^/ X- ../ in, A. ^-^..SA-?&^^ Jagdish Ram S/o Shoshi Ram, Aged about 30 years, R/o ViUage Lota, TahsU ~ Bagicha, Distt, Jashpur-(C.G.) VERSUS / 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, D,K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) / 2] CoUector, Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur- (C.G.) y 3] The Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue), Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur-(C.G.) ^A\ The Tahsildar Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur-(C.G.) ^5] Mohaa Ram. S/o Ranieshwar, Panchayat Secretary, ViUage Panchayat Lota, TahsU - Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur-(C.G.) ^ 6] Keshwar Ram S/o Mathu Ram, Sarpanch, Village Panchayat Lota, Tahsil - Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur-(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^D <i~i mCH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B: Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra W.P.CONo. 3367/2010 PETITIONER : JagdishRam Versus RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Ors. Appearance: Shri A.N. Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.S. Kachwaha, Deputy Advocate General for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORALORDER (09.07.2010) Heard on admission 2. Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that on his complaint against the respondent No.5 and 6, Panchayat Secretary and the Sarpanch respectively of Gram Panchayat, Lota, a preliminary enquiry was made and a report was submitted. Thereafter, he has not been communicated with the result of his representation, which he had preferred before the Collector for taking action against the said respondent. 3. In view of the above, it is directed that if the representation filed by the petitioner is still pending before the Collector, the same shall be disposed of within a reasonable time after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the parties concemed and in ^ accordance with law. ^ll^^liNJI^ISi?liIiltSI% ^ ^ 4. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits ofthe matter, and the representation shall be decided on its own ments. 5. With this observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Cy^ Q'