IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH OCTOBER 2010 / 14TH ASWINA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 6066 of 2010() ----------------------------------------- CRIME NO.8/2010 OF VAMANAPURAM EXCISE RANGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED -------------------------------------- SURENDRAN, S/O.VELAYUDHAN, CHARUVILA VEEDU, VADARUKONAM, PULICHAMALA, ANAD MURI, THOLICOD VILLAGE, NEDUMANGADU TALUK, TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.K.SATHEESH KUMAR SRI.K.S.PRAVEEN RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT ----------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss V.RAMKUMAR, J. ---------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.6066 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 6th day of October, 2010 ORDER In this petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the sole accused in Crime No.8 of 2010 of Vamanapuram Excise Range for offences punishable under Sections 58 & 55(i) of the Abkari Act for allegedly having been found in possession of 1.300 litres of Indian Made foreign liquor, seeks his enlargement on bail. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application submitting inter alia that the petitioner is involved in two other crimes of similar nature. 3. It is too early to accept the petitioner's contention that he has been falsely implicated in the case. Moreover, I am not satisfied that both the grounds enumerated under Section 41A (b)(ii) of the Abkari Act are present in this case so as to justify his release on bail. With the above observation this Application is dismissed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj