IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.256 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.256 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.256 OF 2006 IN IN IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.428 OF 2005 ARBITRATION PETITION NO.428 OF 2005 ARBITRATION PETITION NO.428 OF 2005 Denzil D’Souza & Ors. .. Appellants V/s Ramona Pinto .. Respondents Mr.Rahul Chitnis i/by M/s.Khaitan & Co.for the Appellants. Mr.G.R.Joshi i/by M/s.Little & Co. for the Respondents. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 19.04.2006. DATE : 19.04.2006. DATE : 19.04.2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. The learned Counsel for the Appellant states that the present Appeal has been filed against the interim order passed in the Petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. . The learned Counsel for the Appellants states that the main Petition itself has been disposed of on 17th April, 2006. In view of the same, the present Appeal has become infructous. The learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal. Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.)