IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29297 of 2010 SHIVJI SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in connection with Katihar complaint case no. C.A. 1824 of 2001 registered under Sections 498(A),304(B) of the I.P.C. and Section 4 of the D. P. Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the victim died due to burn injury for which a U.D. Case was lodged and the informant’s side was informed but subsequently the present complaint case was filed after one month with frivolous allegation. Then the complainant subsequently retracted from the initial version. Considering the fact that the petitioner is husband, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is rejected. However, the learned court below may - 2 - consider the regular bail application of the petitioner without being prejudiced by the order of this court considering the aforesaid submission as recorded and if possible try to dispose off the regular bail application of the petitioner on the same day. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)