THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 4045 of 2003 ORDER : 1. Heard both sides. 2. The dispute is with regard to payment of principal amount to a tune of Rs.83,665.30 ps. The question to be determined is whether the respondent is entitled for 12% additional market value in terms of Section 23 (1-A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The trial Court is required to reconsider the matter in accordance with the calculation memos that may be filed by both the parties, as per the law laid down by the Apex Court in K.S.Paripoornan v. State of Kerala[1] and Gurupreet Singh v. Union of India[2]. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the Trial Court is directed to dispose of the Execution Petition afresh after filing calculation memos by both the parties and after hearing both sides, in terms of the aforesaid decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. 3. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 09.12.2010 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 4045 of 2003 09.12.2010 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 4045 of 2003 09.12.2010 Between: The Tahsildar, Land Acquisition Officer, Vijayawada …Petitioner And Kalari Venkata Subba Rao …Respondent [1] (1994) 5 SCC 593 [2] (2006) 8 SCC 457