1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 4856 of 2010 Vasim Khan v. FCI and ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr Z.A. Haq, Advocate for petitioner Mr S.R. Deshpande, Adv for respdts 1,2 Coram: D.D. Sinha and A. P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 28th February 2011 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for respondents no. 1 and 2. 2. Writ Petition is directed against the order of transfer dated 21.8.2010 whereby the petitioner is transferred from Amravati to Wardha. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the impugned transfer is bad in law since it is a mid-term transfer without assigning any reason and in order to accommodate respondent no. 3. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been protected by interim order dated 4.10.2010 and continued at Amravati as Assistant Grade-II till this date. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent FCI has brought to our notice that the petitioner is working at Amravati for the last 23 years. 5. Considered the contentions canvassed by the 2 respective counsel. The transfer order is issued in middle of the academic session and by virtue of interim order, petitioner continued to work at Amravati, hence, we dispose of the petition with direction to respondent FCI to give effect to the impugned order of transfer on or after 30th April 2011. Similarly, the respondent Corporation shall be entitled to issue fresh transfer order of the petitioner if it so desires. 6. Writ Petition disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE joshi