IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1412 of 2011 Ranjeet Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02 23.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Nobody appears on behalf of the State. This is repeat application seeking bail filed on behalf of the petitioner who has been declared juvenile in conflict with law. Earlier the petitioner had moved this Court for bail in Cr. Rev. no 1329 of 2010 which was considered and dismissed with observation by order dated 09.09.2010 (Annexure-1). This Court while dismissing the application observed as under:- “The petitioner is, however, granted liberty to approach the Court below for bail if all the prosecution witnesses are not examined within 10 months from the date of receipt/ communication of a copy of this order in the Court below.” In the light of the aforesaid liberty, the petitioner on expiry of the period aforesaid moved the learned Juvenile Justice Boar for bail which was rejected by order dated 19.09.2011. Aggrieved thereby he preferred appeal vide Cr. Appeal no. 106 of 2011 which was considered and rejected by order dated 18.11.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that one of the accuseds whose application was earlier rejected moved this Court for bail in Cr. Rev. no. 1049 of 2011 (Gango Mahto @ Pankaj Mahto vs. The State of Bihar) which was allowed by order dated 14.09.2011 ( part of Annexure-3). Learned counsel drew attention of the Court to the averments made in para 5 which read as under:- “5. That till date not even a single witness has been examined by the prosecution.” It is also contended that father of the petitioner who has affirmed affidavit in support of the present application is ready and willing to take responsibility respecting the petitioner in case he is released on bail. It is also contended that petitioner is in remand home/custody since 09.01.2010. Considering the averments made in para 5 and the observation made by this Court in order dated 09.09.2010 (Anexure- 1), the application is disposed of by the following order:- Let the Juvenile Board verify the averments made in para 5 of the present application and if they are correct then the Juvenile Board shall release the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Principal Member, J.J. Board, Begusarai in connection with Cheriya Bariyarpur P.S. case no. 77 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be the father of the petitioner. (ii) It shall be the duty of the aforesaid bailor to monitor the conduct of the petitioner and to produce him before the Court in person as and when called upon, failing which the learned Court below shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (iii) During subsistency of the present privilege if it is found that the petitioner has involved himself in another criminal case then the same shall be treated as breach of condition of bail entailing cancellation. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)