Criminal Misc. No. 25320-M OF 2010(O&M 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. 25320-M OF 2010(O&M) Date of decision:28th January, 2011 Kamaljit Kaur .......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ........Respondents BEFORE: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Present: Mr. B.S.Bajwa, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. K.S.Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent-State. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?Yes/No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No Nirmaljit Kaur, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of direction to respondent Nos. 2 to 4 for providing police protection to the petitioner as life and liberty of petitioner is in danger on the hands of private respondents and to protect the life and liberty of the child of the petitioner from the hand of respondent Nos. 5 to 8. Reply by way of an affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 4 has been filed. In paragraph No. 12 of the reply it is submitted Criminal Misc. No. 25320-M OF 2010(O&M 2 that no representation has been received either by the SSP or the SHO Police Station Ghoman. It is further stated that had the petitioner moved any such complaint or representation before the police, action would have been taken by the police without any delay. In view of the reply, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the petitioner with liberty to file a representation. In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty that in case the petitioner files an application before the concerned SHO of the police station with a copy to the SSP, respondent shall enquire into the same and take appropriate measures, if need be, in accordance with law within ten days of the receipt of the said representation. [NIRMALJIT KAUR] JUDGE 28th January, 2011 Shivani Kaushik