IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7979 of 2011 SANTOSH SAO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 04.04.2011 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Amas P.S. Case No. 84 of 2010 registered under Section 414/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 25(1-B)A, 26 of the Arms Act. It is alleged that from the vehicle in question of which the petitioner is owner some arms were recovered. It is also alleged that the owner at the time of seizure fled away from the place of occurrence. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner sold the vehicle to one Jhoti Rai but he did not get the vehicle transferred in his name. Let the learned court-below i.e. S.D.J.M., Sherghati, Gaya consider the regular bail application of the petitioner without being prejudiced by the order of this Court keeping in mind that the petitioner was not apprehended from the place of seizure. 2 With the above observation, this application is disposed off. Mkr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)