IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3230 of 2009 DR. RATAN KUMAR JHA, son of late Bal Govind Jha, resident of village- Sinuar Gopal, P.O. and Police Station- Laheriasarai, District- Darbhanga at present posted as Lecturer in Geography, M.L.S.M. College, Darbhanga. …..Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Sri K.K. Pathak, I.A.S., at present posted as Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Lalit Narayan Mithila University, through its Registrar Sri Bimal Kumar, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. 4. Dr. Mishri Lal Thakur, Vice Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. 5. Sri Yogendra Rawat ‘ Jigyashu’, Finance Officer, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. ….Opposite Parties. ----------- 07- 22.06.2011 Heard Mr. Gyanand Rai for the petitioner, learned Assistant Counsel to Standing Counsel No.10 for opposite party nos.1 and 2, and Ms. Nivedita Nirvikar for opposite party nos.3 to 5. This application under Article 215 of the Constitution of India, read with Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 has been filed by the petitioner of C.W.J.C. No.15007 of 2006 for the alleged non-implementation of the order dated 6.8.2007, whereby the writ petition was disposed of and the Registrar of Lalit Narayan Mithila University was directed to dispose of the petitioner’s representation by a reasoned order and ensure 2 payment of the lawful dues to him. Non-payment of the dues has led to the present contempt application. 2. In compliance of the order dated 5.5.2011, the Registrar of the University is present in Court with demand draft bearing no.427530, dated 21.6.2011, for Rs.10,000/-, in favour of the petitioner, towards payment of costs, which has been made over to the learned counsel for the petitioner. Opposite party nos.3 to 5 have placed on record their show-cause, wherein it is stated that the Registrar of the University has disposed of the petitioner’s representation and a sum of Rs.6,23,114.00P has been found due to the petitioner which has already been forwarded to the Principal of the College for payment to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner expresses satisfaction about the implementation of the order and seeks permission to withdraw this application. 3. In that view of the matter, this application is disposed of. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/