IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2947 of 2004 ARPITA SRIVASTAVA daughter of Sri Dharamdeo Prasad Sinha wife of Sri R. B. Lal, resident of ‘Sushila Kunj’ P.O. Mahendru, P.S. Sultanganj, District- Patna-6. .... Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary Human Resources Development Department (Elementary Education) Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Director, Elementary Education, Human Resources Development Department, New Secretariat, Patna. 3. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna. 4. The Collector cum Chairman of the District Education Establishment Committee, Patna. 5. District Superintendent of Education, Patna. ... Respondents. ----------- 4. 16.11.2010 Having heard learned counsel for the parties as also keeping into account that the grievance of the petitioner made in this writ application stands ventilated by issuance of Office Order contained in Memo No. 4765 dated 15.11.2010, Mr. Gajendra Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner would very fairly submit that he does not intend to press this writ application. Mr. Jha has, however, said that the petitioner’s seniority and consequential benefits in terms of her order of appointment dated 21st July 1995 should have been also restored by respondent, District Superintendent of Education, Patna. In the opinion of this Court, the prayer made in 2 this writ application being very limited confined to her posting on clear vacancy as also consequential benefit arising out of such posting, this Court would not like to go into the rejuvenated claim of seniority at this stage. It however goes without saying that since the appointment of the petitioner was made pursuant to an order of this Court passed in CWJC No. 9038 of 1994, her all rights will flow in the light of the directions given by this Court in the aforementioned writ application. The respondent, District Superintendent of Education, Patna who was directed to appear before this Court to explain the reasons for not accepting the joining of the petitioner, through his Counsel Mr. Prabhakar Tekariwal, learned G. A. -1 has assured that all the due claimed on the petitioner will be settled strictly in accordance with law and that now the petitioner will have no longer any grievance as with regard to her appointment and posting. Recording the aforesaid assurance and in the light of the order contained in Memo No. 4765 dated 15.11.2010, this writ application is disposed of. Let the appearance of Mr. Shashi Bhushan Rai, 3 the District Superintendent of Education, Patna be dispensed with. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)