IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.10136 of 2011 Date of Decision:- 01.06.2011 Ravinder Kumar ....Petitioner(s) vs. State of Punjab and others ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH *** Present:- Mr.Parveen Kumar Kataria, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (Oral) It is the contention of the counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is entitled to the revised pay-scale with effect from 1.1.1996 which has not been granted although similarly placed employees have been granted the said benefit. Referring to the order passed by this Court in Regular Second Appeal No.4981 of 2009 titled as Ravinder Kumar vs. Milk Fed Punjab (Annexure P-9), he submits that the petitioner was granted the liberty to make a representation for claiming the said benefit in the light of the admitted position that the claim of the petitioner was under consideration by the respondent-Competent Authority. The petitioner further claims in this writ petition the ancillary claims which are pending with the respondents without any decision thereon. It is the contention of the petitioner that a comprehensive representation dated 6.12.2010 (Annexure P-10) has been submitted by the petitioner, detailing therein all his grievances and claims but the same has not as yet been considered as no decision has been conveyed to the C.W.P.No.10136 of 2011 -2- petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner, at this stage, would be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.2-Managing Director, The Punjab State Cooperative Milk Producers' Federation Limited (Milkfed), Punjab within some specified time. If that be so, without going into the merits of the case or commenting thereon, the present writ petition is disposed of with directions to the Managing Director, Milkfed Punjab-respondent No.2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 6.12.2010 (Annexure P-10) within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The decision so taken be conveyed to the petitioner forthwith. In case the claims as made by the petitioner in his representation are accepted, the consequential benefits be released to him within a further period of two months. June 01, 2011 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) poonam JUDGE