SSK/923 1 WP.6073.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6073 OF 2010 Niyazzoddin Paroddin Pathan ....Petitioner Versus The Settlement Commissioner & Dy. Director & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Tushar Sonawane, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. D. Rayrikar, AGP for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. G. R. Agrwal, Advocate for respondent no.4. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 26th APRIL, 2011. P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. The impugned order is passed by the Deputy Director, Land Records, Nashik Division, Nashik under Section 32(1) of the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holding Act, 1947(in short “the said Act”). This order is revisable before the Government under Section 35 of the said Act. In that view of the matter, the petitioner has an alternative efficacious remedy. On that ground, the writ petition is disposed of. SSK/923 2 WP.6073.10 3. The petitioner, however, is at liberty to challenge the impugned order by filing revision before the Government under Section 35 of the said Act. In order to enable, the petitioner to approach the Revisional Authority, interim relief granted on 4th August, 2010 is continued for a period of eight weeks from today. (RANJIT MORE, J.)