IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 21723 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION : 08.12.2011 Gagan Sharma .... PETITIONER Versus State of Punjab and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present: Mr. Sumeet Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) Faced with the situation that the petitioner has the remedy of appeal to challenge the impugned order dated 29.9.2008 (Annexure P-33) passed by the Directorate, Industries & Commerce, Punjab, Chandigarh, under Rule 17 of the Industrial Policy and Incentive Code, 1996, learned counsel states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail the said remedy. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. If the petitioner files appeal against the impugned order within a period of two months from today, the Appellate Authority is directed to consider and decide the appeal in accordance with law on merits, expeditiously, CWP No. 21723 of 2011 -2- preferably within a period of four months from the date of its filing, after hearing both the parties, by passing a speaking order. It will be open for the petitioner to file an application for stay before the Appellate Authority. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE December 08, 2011 ( PARAMJEET SINGH ) ndj JUDGE