(.^-M^ ® SiNCLE BENCrt! IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S.) NO ^ /2010 PETITIONERS: -K^ ^y ^?^1 '/''^^' ^7/^%v -•J~x^y ^w' u/ s>/ ^ 1)' Pritram Chandra S/o Shri Shyamlal Chandra, Aged about 42 years, Headmaster Navin Primary School, Bastipara, Tushar, Block Jaijaipur, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 2) r Omeshwar Patel S/o Shri Sundermani Patel Aged about 40 years, Headmaster Primary School, Latiyadih, Block Dabhra, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 3)' Gourishankar Shrivas S/o Shri Ramdayal Shrivas, aged about 39 years, Headmaster Navin Primary School Dipapara-Dabhra, Block Dabhra, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Dinesh Kumar Jaiswal S/o Shri Laxmna Prasad Jaiswal, aged bout 41 years, Headmaster Primary School Uron Para- Adbhar, Block Malkharoda, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 4)^' VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh: Through : The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) (3) (£:•• ^" 2. ' District Education Officer, Janjgir, Distt Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FQR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY QR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. (\. ^£^^,««^^ssa.s /^r. HJGH COURTOF CHHATT'ISGARH : BiLASPUR PETiTiONERS RESPONDENTS WR!T PETITION (S) N0.2269 OF2010 Pritram Chandra & Others Versys State of Chhattisoarh & Others (Writ Petition under Artide 226 oflhe Constitution of india) Slngie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Gowri Shri D.R. Pafei, Advocate for the petitbners, Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 5th day of May, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners sybmits that the petitioners were appointed initiaily as Assistaot Teacher on a tixed pay on probation, After compietion of thelr respectjve probation period, the petltioners were granted regular pay scaie,, Learned counsel further submits that the Issye invojved in the case is asto whether the petitioners are entitled to regyiar pay scale w.eJ. the date of injtlai appointment or after completion of probation period. 2. Leamed counsel for the partles jointly sybmit that the iss'ue Invoived herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Admioistrative Tribunal, Jabaipur (for short "the SAFf) in O.A.No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 othei^ vs. State ofM.P. & others), whereln it was held that the similarly situated teacher^ are erstitled to regolar pay scale w.e.f. the date of.initiat appointment. The matter was taken up to the Sypreme Court. The appeai was dismlssed by the Suprerne Court, upholdiog the decision of the TribunaS to the effect that the Teachers/Asslstant Teachers are entltled to regular pay scaie trom date of Initiai appointment. 3. in view of the above submlsslons made by learned ooynsei for the parties, the petitioners are granted liberty to make representations to the respottdent authorities, if so advlsed, to consider their cases and pass approprlate order, on its own merit and in Sts perspective, in the iight of the order passed by the SAT in Madhukant Yadu (supra) and subsequently confirmed by the Supreme Court'ln Speciai Leave Petition (Civll) No. 6892/93 by order dated 3-1-1994. 4. AcGordlngly, the writ petition is disposed ot [ Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge