IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 110 of 2008. IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No.572 of 2007 Vijayshankar Baijnath Tiwari ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr ..Respondents. Mr Prakash Wagh, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for the Respondent No.1-State. Mr Tarunkumar Sinha Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. DATED : 17.06.2008. DATED : 17.06.2008. DATED : 17.06.2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. The learned counsel for Respondent No.2 prayed for permission to withdraw the amount deposited by the Petitioner in this Court in the sum of Rs. 4,25,000/-. This prayer is opposed by the learned counsel for the Petitioner. However, learned counsel for Respondent No.2 is permitted to withdraw this amount, subject to furnishing bank guarantee of any Nationalized Bank with a specific clause that in the event of non-renewal of the bank guarantee, amount covered by it, will be remitted to the High Court without there being any demand from this Court. 3. The Registrar General is directed to pay this amount to the Respondent No.2 by Payee’s Account Cheque with advance notice to the Advocate appearing for the Petitioner as to why the bank guarantee furnished should not be accepted. 4. Criminal Application No. 110 of 2008, accordingly, stands disposed of. (V.C.DAGA,J) (V.C.DAGA,J) (V.C.DAGA,J)