IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10175 of 2006 RAM NARESH PANDIT, S/o Late Ganesh Pandit, R/o Village – Reotith (Garh) P.S.- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj. ……. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Chairman, Industries Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Chairman, Bihar State Khadi & Village Industries Board, Mahesh Bhawan, Gandhi Maidan, Patna. 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Bihar State Khadi & Village Industries Board, Patna. 5. The District Khadi & Village Industries Officer, LaheriaSarai, Darbhanga. …….. Respondents ----------- 3 05.04.2011 Heard Sri Naresh Prasad No.1, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Uma Kant Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 3, 4 & 5 and Sri Vijay Kumar Verma, learned A.C. to Standing Counsel No. 5, appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1 & 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that so far as retrial dues are concerned, same has already been paid to the petitioner, during the pendency of the writ petition. However, some dues are still pending, for which, it was prayed that liberty may be granted to the petitioner for filing representation before the competent authority. In view of stand taken by the parties, there is no need to further keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file representation before respondent no. 4 i.e. Chief Executive Officer, Bihar State Khadi & Village Industries Board. If such representation is filed, it is expected, 2 that respondent no. 4, will examine the same and pass appropriate order, in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)