M §<E§§~§ $GURT G? QHHJETT1$Q§RW EILASPUR ‘ WY}? Peimma {S} No. 535 of 2 €38 Paan La: Parwa S/o. Late Shfi xajdda a ”w b Umsm :e is Versus re L atan , aged abeut 48 years pper n achen Wiiddie Schoei (Tribal Weifaw), Muralia Black — Pa§i, Dfi. — Karina (CG). 1) Se 0f Chhamsga through the Set ent Tba! eifaf evraa j Dcyamw 0‘ n “Ve 3K5 Bv1a’z a'pnCG, aw Ru Ax g; Cemmissioner, Tribai We§fare ChhamSgarh, Gait. Ra§pua 3) Sstam Cone Tl eha Kara {C {Writ Pefition unc¥er Article 225 of ihe Constitutbn of mafia) $B: Hon’bie ML $at§sh K. gnihotri, J. resent: $§1r§ R csei $hr§ Ad Eub, P La 6 . aam. GREER {passed on 25‘“ January,2gea} ‘fhe petiiioner was mitiaiiy appoin3ed on 15-24%0 as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay scaie of Rs.i5§3i_ en probaiion for a perioei of mo yeafs. After campietion ‘of probation, ihe petitioner was granted regmar pay scale of Rs. ‘16§-300/’- 2) Learned counsei appearing for the petiiSoner submits ihai: the issue invoived in éhe case is asio whether the peimener §s enti'ried i0 reguiar pay scaie with effect from ’the date of imtiai appoimmeni or after compie‘tion of probation period. 3). The issue mvoived herein wae cons;dered by *i‘e Madaya Pradesa State Administmtwe Tribune} Jabaipur m 0AM: 2745189 Peiiiioner mav ar Resgondenis tat H nSi mmsssmr riba Wm Drstt b C} A P A\ amm elmmHm “ermnnar wxn ey ane wver ‘1 f e Skate {Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of MP. & othefs) wherem it was held that the simiiayiy situated teachers am entiiied to reguiar pay scab wifn effect from ihe dam of init§ai anpoiniment‘ The mattar was taken up the Hon’bie Supreme Cour? uphoiding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Asststarat Teachers are entttied to regutar pay scaie from date of inttiai apoointment. 4‘: Learned counsei appeating for the petitionetrx further submits that this Court white consi'deting the same issue in Amer Sat Ram & ethers Vs State of Chhattisgarh & others (WP. (s) No. 4725/2006) by order dated ‘i.9.2GO6, has granted regutar pay scate w.e.f. the date 0f initiai, anpetntment. 5) Learned counsei appearing for the parties jointiy submit that case §s squarety cevered by the dectsion of thts Court in the caee of Amar Sai Ram & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others (supra). e) in vtew of that this petitieh is disposed of in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sdl— f Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Raju