IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39106 of 2008 RAMA KANT THAKUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 3.12.2008 Heard Sri Pramod Rajpati, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. There was a dacoity in the house of the informant and properties were looted away. The petitioner was identified as one of the dacoits and it is specifically alleged that during the course of dacoity the petitioner was armed with a pistol. Learned counsel attempted to impress upon the court that the petitioner was not carrying on well with the informant on account of certain dispute in respect of purchase of certain land but the court after hearing the petitioner’s learned counsel is not impressed on that. Regard being had to the fact that the petitioner’s role is clearly defined as one of the dacoits in the dacoity, considering which, his prayer for bail is rejected. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )