: 1 : IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. O. O. C. J. O. C. J. O. C. J. COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY APPEAL NO. 8 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 8 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 8 OF 2007 IN IN IN COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY PETITION NO.01/111A/CLB/WR OF 2006 PETITION NO.01/111A/CLB/WR OF 2006 PETITION NO.01/111A/CLB/WR OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY APPEAL NO. 9 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 9 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 9 OF 2007 IN IN IN COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY PETITION NO.112 OF 2005 PETITION NO.112 OF 2005 PETITION NO.112 OF 2005 Kuljinder Singh Ahuluwalia & Anr. ... Appellants. V/s. M/s. Mukat Pipes Ltd. & Anr. ... Respondents. ..... Mr. Janak Dwarkadas with M.S. Doctor i/b. RMG Law Associates for the Appellants. Mr. J.P. Sen i/b. Mulla & Mulla for the Respondents. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. 4TH 4TH 4TH MAY, 2007. MAY, 2007. MAY, 2007. P.C. : . Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellants and the First Respondent (who are the contesting parties in Appeal 8 of 2007) have stated before the Court at the hearing of the Appeals that parties have arrived at a mutually acceptable solution in terms of the Consent terms which are placed on the record. The Consent Terms are marked as ‘X’ and have been signed by the Advocates appearing on behalf of the parties. The Company Appeal : 2 : shall stand disposed of in terms thereof.