IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 43 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 43 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 43 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2320 of 2007 NO. 2320 of 2007 NO. 2320 of 2007 Ms. Nupur Podar .... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra & ors....... Respondent. Mr. Nitin Pradhan i/b. M/s. Juris Consultus for the applicant. Mrs. M.H.Mhatre APP for State. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 15TH FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED; 15TH FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED; 15TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. This motion for speaking to Minutes is moved by the respondet no.3 bank. By an order dated 31-1-2008 I have issued direction for handing over the possession of the vehicle to the petitioner. By this motion, it is tried to be brought on record that the possession of the vehicle was taken pursuant to an action under section 13 of the Securitisation Act. This was never the cotention raised in the trial Court nor was this point argued before this court, when the order dated 31-1-2008 was passed. An altogether new ground is sought to be introduced by moving the matter for Speking to Minutes. Motion thus stands rejected. ....