CRA/378/2004 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 378 of 2004 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= BAGGA TRADING COMPANY - Applicant Versus MOHANSING SURATSING BAGGA – Respondent ========================================================= Appearance : M/S THAKKAR ASSOC. for Applicant MR SUNIT S SHAH for Respondent ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT Date : 02/04/2008 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Both the counsels have made joint request after consulting the respective clients, in view of the fact that the parties are near relatives and controversy is in a very narrow compass, for CRA/378/2004 2/2 JUDGMENT disposing of this Civil Revision Application without entering into the merits as appropriate directions for disposing of the very suit, which is of the year 2002, within stipulated time limits would survive the end of justice so far as this Civil Revision Application is concerned. The counsels have assured this Court that if the direction is issued for disposing of the suit i.e. Summary Civil Suit No. 1106 of 2002 within stipulated period then the counsels and parties would not seek avoidable adjournment and cooperate in expeditious hearing and disposal of the suit. 2. In view of this consensus between the counsels, this Civil Revision Application is disposed of with following direction : “The City Civil Court at Ahmedabad is to hear and dispose of the suit being Summary Civil Suit No. 1106 of 2002 preferably within a period of 4 months after reopening of the summer vacation and shall dispose of the suit not later than the period from 6 months after reopening of the summer vacation. 3. With this direction, the Civil Application is disposed of. Rule discharged. No costs. Parties are at liberty to approach this Court in case of difficulty. (S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) pallav