In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. R.S.A. No. 2612 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.11.2007 State of Haryana and Another …Appellants Versus Lachhman Singh and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Rajeev Kawatra, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the appellants. RAJESH BINDAL, J. The only relief granted to the respondent No.1/plaintiff in the present case by the learned Court below is that the appellants/defendants have been restrained from evicting respondent No.1/plaintiff from the land and house in dispute, except in due course of law. The argument is that injunction could not be granted against true owners. However, in my opinion, no relief as such has been granted in favour of the respondent/plaintiff. The defendants/appellants can very well follow due process of law and evict the respondent No.1/plaintiff from the land and house in dispute. No substantial question of law arises in the present appeal. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge November 17, 2007 “DK”