1 C.A. NO.9390/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9390 OF 2010 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.131 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.656 OF 2010 Dnyanoba Sitaram Mundhe ... APPLICANT VERSUS Prakash s/o Vitthalrao Mundhe & ors. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri V.D. Salunke, Advocate for applicant Shri A.P. Bhandari, Advocate for R.No.1. Shri K.J. Suryawanshi, Advocate holding for Shri S.R. Dheple, Advocate for respondent No.3. Shri V.B. Ghatge, A.G.P. for State ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 20th December, 2010 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The grievance of the petitioner is, of non payment of salary. Mr. Bhandari, appearing for the Principal – respondent No.4, in the affidavit-in-reply has clarified willingness to disburse the cheque in favour of the petitioner for the arrears for the period for which he has worked as per entitlement. The learned counsel assures to be ready with the said cheque on 22.12.2010. 2 C.A. NO.9390/2010 2. Mr. Salunke for the intervener has a grievance, in the present petition the respondent No.3 Shri Nathrao s/o Kondiba Mundhe arrayed as Secretary, is not the Secretary. The learned counsel appearing for Nathrao s/o Kondiba Mundhe submits, Nathrao is still the Secretary of the Trust, pursuant to order passed in Change Report No.295/2005 by the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Parbhani. 3. Considering nature of present proceedings, the petitioner herein is more concerned with his arrears from the respondent – institute and since there is an affidavit from the Principal (respondent No.4), for the present, presence of respondent No.3 in the present proceedings is not warranted. He is accordingly deleted. Consequently, the intervention application would not be maintainable. Intervention application disposed of. 4. Contempt Petition No.131/2010 be placed before the Court on 22nd December 2010. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/ca9390.10