IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.12323 of 2003 Date of Decision : March 18, 2010. Constable Paramjit Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Rajesh K.Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.B.S.Chahal, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is serving as a Constable in the Punjab Police. He seeks quashing of the selection of private respondent Nos.5 to 9 in B-I test held on 31.5.2003. He also seeks a direction to depute him to the Lower School Course being fully qualified and eligible for the said course. Various contentions have been raised by the petitioner in the writ petition in support of his above mentioned claims. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the contention raised on behalf of the petitioner in this writ petition can be gone into by the Officers' Committee consisting (i) Shri Parag Jain, IPS, IGP/Head Quarters, Punjab Police; (ii) Smt.Gurpreet C.W.P.No .12323 of 2003 2 Kaur Deo, IPS, DIG, Administration, Punjab Police Headquarters; and (iii) Shri M.S.Gill, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, attached with the DGP, Punjab, constituted by this Court vide an order dated 4.3.2010 passed in C.W.P.No.566 of 2010 (Ranjit Singh and others versus State of Punjab and others), to consider and redress the grievances of the police personnel like the petitioner in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the aforesaid Officers Committee to consider the claim of the petitioner in accordance with the Rules/Policies on the basis of the plea taken by him in the writ petition and/or additional plea(s) he may take before the Committee. The Committee shall hear the parties concerned and thereafter, shall taken an appropriate decision as early as possible, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. It is made clear that in case the Committee makes any recommendations in favour of the petitioner, the Competent Authority shall implement the same within a period of two months thereafter, unless disagrees for the reasons to be assigned in writing. Dasti. March 18, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE