IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 29TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1165 of 2010(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.21892/2004 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.S.KURAIN, ALAYAPARAMBIL THAZHAKKARA PO, MAVELIKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.RINNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMPIL SMT.ASHA ELIZABETH MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DILEEP KUMAR DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADDITIONAL RESPONDENT: 2. THE SECRETARY, MAVEILIKKARA MUNICIPALITY. (R2 IS IMPEADED AS PER ORDER IN I.A.NO.638/2010 ON 29.11.2010) SRI.K.HARILAL,STANDING COUNSEL GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.NISHA BOSE THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/11/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== Contempt Case (C).No. 1165 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 29th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed this contempt case complaining of non- compliance with the directions in Annexure A1 judgment. The directions in Annexure A1 judgment are as follows; “6. ..... The first respondent shall pass a fresh order with regard to the mode of treatment of the period from 17.1.1983 to 30.8.1984 in accordance with law and in the light of the observations made above. Such order shall be passed within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Based upon the orders and subject to the same, the full pension due to the petitioner along with DCRG due and admissible to him shall be disbursed within one month thereafter. If any liability has been fixed against the petitioner, the same should be adjusted from the DCRG due to the petitioner.” In view of the fact that ultimately the retirement benefits have to be disbursed by the Municipality from which the petitioner retired, the petitioner has filed I.A.No.638/2010 for impleading the Secretary of the Mavelikkara Municipality as additional 2nd respondent in the contempt case. The learned counsel for the 2nd respondent submits that revised monthly pension of the petitioner can be disbursed from December onwards and arrears of pension would be disbursed within three months. Regarding the DCRG, the counsel for the 2nd respondent submits that the DCRG can be disbursed only after obtaining non- liability certificates from the five other municipalities, where the petitioner had earlier worked and that the DCRG would also be disbursed as soon as non-liability certificates are so received. This is recorded and the contempt case is closed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2