IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16131 of 2010 1. ABHAY KANT S/O SHRI VIJAY PRAKASH SINGH R/O VILL.- BARKI SIRISIYAN, P.S.- BHELDI, DISTT.- CHAPRA (SARAN) Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, CHAPRA 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, CHAPRA 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PARSA, CHAPRA 6. THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, PARSA, CHAPRA 7. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, PACHRUKHI, CHAPRA 8. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, PACHRUKHI, CHAPRA 9. THE DISTRICT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS MEMBER, SARAN (CHAPRA) 10. RAKESH KUMAR S/O JAGDANAND SINGH R/O VILL.- BARKI SIRISIYA, P.O.- SHOBHEPUR, P.S.- BHELDI, DISTT.- CHAPRA ----------- 2 05/05/2011 It may be a special case where suit will be a proper remedy if the petitioner comes with the kind of allegations which have been made not only against the Appellate Authority that the issue has been decided without looking into any document, but there is forgery, interpolations made in the record and even changing the so called counseling register. The writ Court cannot really go into all these matters which are disputes - 2 - requiring taking of evidence. Let the petitioner file a suit, get a declaration, summon all the evidence which he can in this regard and establish his case before a trial court as the trial court is a better forum for such adjudication rather than a writ Court. This writ application is disposed of with liberty as above. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)