IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.349 of 2007 1. ANJORIA DEVI WIFE OF JEETAN PRASAD (DECEASED) 2. YOGENDRA PRASAD MAHTO @ YOGENDRA MAHTO S/O JEETAN PRASAD (DECEASED), BOTH RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE MUSEHARI, P.O. AND P.S. JAMO, PARGANA, BARAI, DISTRICT SIWAN, AT PRESENT PETITIONER NO.2 RESIDENT OF SANJOH ROAD, JHARSUGUDA, ORISSA …PLAINTIFFS IN THE COURT BELOW/APPELLANTS Versus 1. CHANDRIKA PRASAD MAHTO SON OF JEETAN PRASAD (DECEASED) 2. SITA RAM PRASAD MAHTO SON OF JEETAN PRASAD (DECEASED) 3. PRAVAWATI DEVI W/O CHANDRIKA PRASAD MAHTO 4. SMT. SHEO KUMARI DEVI WIFE OF SITA RAM PRASAD 5. NAND LAL PRASAD S/O LATE SAWARATH SAH, ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE MUSEHARI, P.O. AND P.S. JAMO PRAGNA, BARAI, DISTT. SIWAN …. DEFENDANT 1ST SET IN THE COURT BELOW/RESPONDENTS 1ST SET 6. LALTI DEVI 7. LILAWATI DEVI, BOTH DAUGHTERS OF JEETAN PRASAD (DECEASED) 8. JAY PRAKASH 9. OM PRAKASH 10. PANA DEVI 11. MINA DEVI 12. GEETA DEVI, NO.8 TO 12 ARE SONS AND DAUGHTERS OF LATE MUNI DEVI PREDECEASED DAUGHTER OF JEETAN PRASAD (DECEASED) NO.6 TO 12 ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE MUSEHARI, PRAGNA, BARAI, P.O. AND P.S. JAMA, DISTT. SIWAN …. DEFENDANTS 2ND SET IN THE COURT BELOW/RESPONDENTS 2ND SET ----------- 8. 6.12.2010 The appellants are aggrieved by the order dated 17.3.2007 passed by the Sub-Judge 3rd, Siwan in Title Suit No.6 of 2004, by which he has refused injunction. From the order impugned, I find that the court below after hearing arguments on both sides concluded that no irreparable loss would be caused to the appellants if the induction was refused. 2 Since the court below had considered all aspects of the case, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The appeal is dismissed. However, the court below is directed to conclude the proceedings within a period of six months, for which no unnecessary adjournments shall be given to either of the parties. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )