BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Sixth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.PALANIVELU CRL OP(MD) No.12834 of 2011 A.MEENAMBAL : PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CSCID, TRICHY. IN CRIME NO.202/2011 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.LENIN KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr. A.RAMAR Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 6(4) of TNSC (RDCS) order 1982 r/w 7(1)(a)(ii) of E.C. Act 1955, in Crime No.202 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was charged under Sections 6(4) of TNSC (RDCS) order 1982 r/w 7(1)(a)(ii) of E.C. Act 1955. He further submitted that the petitioner is innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that this petitioner is the owner of the vehicle and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that this petitioner is the owner of the vehicle and the investigation is considerably over and even though the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner was not arrested, neither he interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Trichy and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 26/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.6, TRICHY. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CSCID, TRICHY. +1 CC to M/S. T.LENIN KUMAR Advocate SR.No.33247 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12834 of 2011 Date :26/09/2011 NSV/27.9.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/