:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 117 OF 2005 Saifal @ Salim Lalsaab Pitale ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr. Deepak Girme, for the Applicant. Mr. K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 17th January 2005 P.C.: 1. This application has been filed on the assertion that as on date, no Judge has been appointed to take up matters, in particular the pending trial pertaining to the Applicant. Even so, to my mind, this is not a case for showing any indulgence to the Applicant for the reasons already recorded in my order dated December 2, 2004. Insofar as non-availability of the Judge is concerned, that is a matter which is bound to :2: be taken care of sooner or later, but, in such a short time, the application as filed at the instance of the Applicant cannot be countenanced. Dismissed. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)