IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.611 of 2010 NOOR JAHAN AND ANOTHER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 06.7.2010. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. The writ petition is devoid of necessary pleadings and parties. The alleged victim girl has not been impleaded as opposite party. There is no statement that she has been released in favour of her parents from the Remand Home by the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate which the petitioners have already challenged by filing Cr.Revision No.1085 of 2009 stated to be pending before the District and Sessions Judge, Patna. Since the petitioners are already pursuing a legal remedy available to them, we do not consider it proper to entertain this writ petition to start a parallel proceeding. It is, however, made clear that the present order shall have absolutely no bearing whatsoever on the proceedings in the revision preferred by the petitioners in the court 2 concerned directing her release from the Remand Home in favour of her parents alleging that she was a major and which has to be decided on its own merits in accordance with law. We consider it appropriate to direct that Cr.Revision no.1085 of 2009 pending in the court of the District and Sessions judged, Patna be considered and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law without granting unnecessary or frivolous adjournments. Needless to add that if the petitioners file any appropriate application for interim directions in the pending revision, it is required to be considered and disposed of expeditiously. The present writ application is dismissed. ahk (Navin Sinha,J.) (Jyoti Saran, J.)