IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15146 of 2007 BASUDEO SINGH Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Uday Bhan Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. D. K. Sinha, Senior Advocate Mrs. Praul Ranjan, Advocate ----------- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ----------- Dated, the 26th August, 2008. We heard the counsel for the petitioner. 2. The Tribunal considered the mater thus: - “…… it is evident that the applicant was absent from duty right from 17.2.1997 up to his date of retirement, that is, 31.3.2003. It is also stated by the respondents that he was given the job of Gate Man. The case of the applicant, as presented in the present OA, is a reproduction of the same as in the previous OA. The matter was decided by the Tribunal in the earlier OA. The respondents in accordance with the earlier direction passed detailed orders. The period of absence of the applicant from duty which is six years approximately has been adjusted and regularized as ex Cabinman as on leave of different categories, most of which is leave without pay since no other leave is said to be due to the applicant for that period.” 2. We find no justifiable reason to take a view different from that of the Tribunal. 3. Writ petition does not deserve to be admitted. - 2 - It is dismissed in limine. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J Pawan/-