IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL MISC. APPEAL No. 1576 of 2004 UNION OF INDIA V/S M/S SOOD ENTERPRISES & ANR Mr. PANKAJ BOHRA, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 4.1.2005 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the appellant, and perused the impugned judgment. The learned District Judge has found that the award does not suffer from any of the errors capable of interference by the Court under the provisions of Section 30 of the Arbitration Act. Learned counsel submitted that the arbitrator has misconducted in deciding claims no.1, 6 and 7. Suffice it to say that at best, the out come of the submissions of learned counsel is that the finding on three claims no.1, 6 and 7 is erroneous, but then, there is nothing to show that the arbitrator has committed any misconduct in arriving at the finding on all or either of the three claims. In that view of the matter, I do not find any sufficient ground to interfere with the impugned judgment. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/