IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6517 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : January 09, 2012 Rakesh Kumar ....Petitioner versus Smt. Sushma Sharma and others ....Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. Anand Chhibbar, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. RK Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 Mr. Chetan Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kunal Mulwani, Advocate for applicants (LRs of defendant no. 7-Versha Sangar) L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition in view of subsequent developments with liberty to pursue his remedy in the executing court, in accordance with law. Counsel for the applicants (LRs of defendant no. 7 – Versha Sangar) contended that impugned order should have no bearing against the rights of the said applicants because they are not party to the impugned order. There is considerable merit in the contention. Obviously, impugned order shall have no bearing on the rights of the aforesaid applicants who are not party to the impugned order. Counsel for the petitioner contended that Civil Revision No. 6517 of 2009 (O&M) -2- petitioner also claims the share of Versha Sangar. However, this question has not been determined by the executing court in the impugned order. Consequently, the parties shall be at liberty to pursue their remedy in accordance with law. Subject to aforesaid, the instant revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. ( L.N. Mittal ) January 09, 2012 Judge 'dalbir'