<<T HtGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Appellant Claimant Hon'bie Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. P.A.C.No.1376 of 2007 Ghanshyam Sinha S/o Ghaslram Sinha, aged about 26 years, by Caste-Katar, R/o VilSage Kuliya (Komakhan) Thana-Bagbahara, Distt. Mahasamund (CG) Versus Respondents 1. Gajanand Sonwani S/o Kamari Sonwani, aged about 49 years, Villa9e-Magurpani(Kharihar Road) Thana-Jonk, Distt. Nawapara (Orissa) (Driver of the vehicle NO.CG-04 ZP 0519) 2. Jagjeet Singh Shahpuri, S/o Iqbal Singh Sahpuri, aged 28 years, by Caste Sikkh, R/o Village - Khariya Road, Thana-Jonk, Distt. Nawapara (Orrisa) (Owner of the Vehicle No.CG-04 ZP 0519) 3. Branch Manager, The Orientel Indja Insurance Compahy Limited, Madeena BuiJding, Jait Road, Raipur Distt. Raipur (CG) (Insurer of the VehicSe No.CG-04 ZP 0519) Misc. Appeal under Section 173 of Mlotor Vehicle Act Present: Shri Sunil Sahu, counsel for the appellant. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 08.04.2008) Heard on admission. (2) The appeilant is aggrieved by the award dated 17.(^l.2007 passed in claims case No.152/2006 by the Motor Accidents Ctaims Tribunal (henceforth the MACT) Mahasamund, whereby compensation of Rs.99,224/- was awarded in an injury case. . (3) Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant, 1 am of the considered opinion that this appeai has no merit. The claimant did not -2. \G suffer from any permanent disability due to the accident. The MACT held that the claimant had suffered partial disability in the left hand. It is also not disputed that the Company in which the claimant was working is closed and the claimant did not adduce any evidence to show loss of income. The MACT has awarded compensation as under:- A/ For pain & suffering B/ For loss of income for three months C/ For loss of working capacity D/ For expenses incurred in treatment Total Rs.15,000/- Rs.15,000/- Rs.10,000/- Rs.59,224 Rs.99,224/- Pnya (4) In the facts and circumstances mentioned above, 1 am of he considered opinion, that the compensation awarded by the MACT does not call for any enhancement. (5) The appeai being devoid of any merit is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge I • .