IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2356 of 2009 SACHIDANAND SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 19.2.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. The grievance of the petitioner against an order of transfer, as contained in Annexure 4, is based on an analogy that earlier the mutual transfer of the petitioner was allowed from Khagaria to Begusarai, whereafter the said order of transfer dated 30th June, 2008 had already been complied by him and as such, there was no necessity of petitioner being reverted back to Khagaria by the impugned order. It is, however, an admitted position that in terms of the impugned order the petitioner has again joined back at Khagaria but he is finding himself in certain difficulty basically on account of the date of retirement which is 31st of May, 2010. Counsel for the petitioner submits that if the petitioner was allowed to continue in Begusarai which is his home district, the petitioner could have settled in a better manner after his retirement. 2 In the opinion of this Court, these administrative matters can be better looked into by the departmental head, namely, the Director of Welfare Department. In that view of the matter, this Court would give liberty to the petitioner to approach the Director of Welfare Department who will be under obligation to dispose of the representation of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order by a speaking order. This application, accordingly, stands disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/