cp-^^1^- BgSfiONDENTS ^- €^" BfeFORE THE HIQH GOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR tCHHATTISGARH ) W.P.(S)No. 5<?/ Qf2009 -^" ~ : . - • :1; . NBTITIONER : A.K. Sonwane, S/p D.T, Sonwane, aged about 44 years, R/p Q.No. 117,, Poonam Colony, Rajnandgaon (C.Q.) VERSUS ly'^StateofChhattisgarh , ; Through the SecretaF^ Agrlculture Department D.K.S. Bhawan/ Rajpur (C.G.) 2) The Director, Jal Grahan Khetra Vikas (Hariyali) Karyakram, Vikas Ayukt Karyalaya, Vikas Bhawan (Jal Grahan" PraKosht) Civil.Line Raipur (C.G.) :<^'" -_^ , _. . _ : . .. _. 3) Deputy Director, Prakratik Sansadhan, Prabandhan Sambhag, Agricylture and Co-operative Department, Agriculture, Mantralaya Bharat Sarkar Shastri Bhayvan New Delhi. 4) R.K. Sharma S/o 8hr| gharat Lal Sharma, aged about 49 years, occupation Serviee, Posted as Assistarri' Soil Conservation Officer Durg, Distriet Durg(C.G.) • MfRlT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 2260F THE CQNSTITUTIQN OFINDIA. \ ^^wy/ '4C^y .("'\ ivi^y ^w l!;i!^^l a';;:ll M IM.'II 't:ti il;.-'?t:l H ISfl ifa m Wf» ^^ i;i|! ;?ts.:iFiqFaai '.l' HiGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BILASPUR WRiT PETITION (S) N0.5171 OF 2009 PETITIGNER A.K. Sonwane RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh& Others (Wrrt petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Slngie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri T.K. Tiwari, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Advocate General fortheState. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on this 14'" day of September, 2009) 1. With the consent of learned counsei aDDearina for the oarties. the petition is heard finaliy. 2. Pursuant to the order dated 6-7-20C®(Annexure - P/4) passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P. (S) No.3166 of 2009 (R.K. Sharma vs. State of C.G. & Others), vide order dated 18-8-2009 (Annexure - P/5) the representation of Shri R.K. Sharma was allowed by the Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Govemment of Chhattisgarh and the transfer order dated 29-8-2009 passed in his respect has been cancelled and, as such, the h'ansfer order (assed in respect of the petitioner was automatiealiy cancelled, though by order dated 29-6-2CU9 (Annexure - P/1) the petitioner was transferred from Rajnandgaon to Durg. 3. Before decision on the representation of the respondent No.4 herein (Shri R.K. Sharma), the petitioner had aiready joined at Durg, according to the iearned counsel appearing for the psStioner. 4. !n view of foregoing, it would be appropriate if the erder dated 18-8-2009 (Annexure - P/5) is reconsldered after giving notice to the respondent No.4 as well as the petitioner for passing appropFiate orders in public interest and on administrative ewgency, in accordance with law and on its own merits. 5. In the result, the order dated 18-8-20)9 (Annexure - P/5) is quashed. The petition is allowed to the extent indicatedabove. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ;iVi^:t: