IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2637 of 2011 SAROGI STEEL PRIVATE LTD. . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR &ANR . ----------- 2. 17.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Questioning the order dated 7.10.2010 in Title Suit No. 17 of 2001 preferred by the petitioner/plaintiff, it is submitted that it is apparent from the impugned order that there was only a mis- match between the description of the ‘ward’ of the property between the plaint and the schedule. Nothing new was sought to be brought in by the amendment, only the mis-match was sought to be clarified. Counsel for the State from the submissions made on behalf of the State before the trial Court itself finds it difficult to persuade this Court that there was nothing beyond a question of mis-match in the pleadings involved. The State does not stand in the category of a private litigant. The State has certain privileges as a litigant but those privileges translate into restrictions in assisting the Court in disposal of litigation in certain circumstances. Suffice it that the conduct of the State leaves much to be desired. 2 The order dated 7.10.20010 is set aside. The amendment application seeking correction of mis-match between the plaint and in the schedule of the plaint is allowed. The application stands allowed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)