IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14058 of 2009 MADAN YADAV, son of late Shankar Yadav, resident of village – Guruwalia, Police Station – Bettiah Mofussil, (Manuapul), District – Champaran ……………………….Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ……………………..Opposite party ----------- 02. 27.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is in custody since 1.12.2008 in relation to Mofussil (Manuwapul) P.S. Case No. 243 of 2008 which was instituted under sections 392, 394 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. In the FIR no person has been named as an accused since it was lodged against unknown persons alleging therein that while informant was returning from the town he was waylaid by three persons and robbed of his belongings. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the implication of the petitioner is on the basis of confessional statement of a co-accused and there is no evidence to link the petitioner with any crime as there is neither any recovery from his possession nor was he put on TIP and to that extent the petitioner is entitled to be given benefit of doubt at this stage. Taking the above circumstances into consideration, let the petitioner Madan Yadav be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah (West Champaran) in Bettiah Mofussil (Manuwapul) P S Case No.243 of - 2 - 2008. However, one of the sureties will be executed by atleast an elected representative of the Panchayat to which petitioner belongs. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)