( 1 ) wp2495.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2495 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10185 OF 2011 Yadgir Narsayya Gouda .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. P.K. Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr. V.G. Shelke, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 5; Mr. S.K. Matpati h/f. Mr. S.B. Talekar, Advocate for respondent No.6. CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 15.09.2011 P.C. :- 1. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner does not press the petition for the reliefs claimed in prayer clauses B,C,D & E. All that he wants this Court to do is to request the Hon’ble Minister to deliver judgment in Revision No. RVN/N-0111/RA-2/EXC-3, which is now pending before him for judgment. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner said that the Hon’ble Minister has already heard the revision on merits, both the parties were represented by the Counsels before him and the hearing took place on 4th May, 2001. The petitioner is now waiting for the judgment in the revision. Since considerable time has elapsed since the ( 2 ) wp2495.11 hearing, the petitioner’s advocate only urged that this Court may direct or request the Hon’ble Minister to pass necessary order. Such request is innocuous and would dispose of the writ petition finally. No prejudice is likely to be caused to the respondents also. The writ petition is disposed of by following order :- . The Hon’ble Minister is requested to deliver judgment in Revision No. RVN/N-0111/RA-2/EXC-3, as soon as possible. 2. The pending Civil Application also stands disposed of. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] snk/2011/SEP11/wp2495.11