1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Writ Petition No.2839 OF 2010 Mahatma Phule Multi Services through its Proprietor Vijay S/o Nagorao Kale ... Petitioner. Versus Union of India & Others. ... Respondents. -------- Shri. J.N. Singh, Advocate for petitioner. Shri. Alok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General for Union of India – respondent No.1. Shri. Jayant Chitnis, counsel for the respondent Nos.2,3 and 4. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE: 31st MARCH 2010 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has 2 participated in the tender process. The counsel for the respondent Nos.2 to 4 submits that six tenders are short listed. The counsel further submits that the tender notices have not been processed and finalized. 3) In view of the statement no cause of action arises for the petitioner to file the petition. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty. (N.D. DESHPANDE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ wp.2839.10