IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1937 of 2007 MD.SHAH ALAM @ SHAH ALAM Versus MD.MUMTAJ (MINOR) ----------- 3. 9.9.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the detailed order passed by the court below while granting maintenance to the minor son of the petitioner cannot be found to be wanting in any respect either on fact or in law. The court below has virtually analysed each and every aspect with the help of evidence and the crucial plea of the petitioner that he is not the biological father of the minor son claiming maintenance has also been gone into at great length. As a matter of fact from the report of the Central Forensic Science Laboratory, Directorate of Forensic Sciences, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, dated 11.8.2003 it would transpire that the petitioner, Md. Shah Alam was the father of the son Master Mumtaz. This is so because after making detailed analysis of the father, the mother and the child the authority has given a detailed analysis report which has been gone into by the court 2 below at great length in the impugned order. This Court, therefore, would not find any flaw in the findings recorded by the court below with regard to the petitioner being the biological father of the minor son, who has been awarded maintenance @ Rs. 700/- per month. As a matter of fact this Court would not find any merit even on the issue of quantum of maintenance as the same cannot be said to be either excessive or illegal. That being so, this application is wholly frivolous and must be and is hereby dismissed with a direction to the petitioner to deposit the arrears and current within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which the court below will be at liberty to take appropriate coercive action against the petitioner. ( Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/