IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2007 / 19TH ASWINA 1929 WP(C).No. 30021 of 2007(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- M/S. L.G. ELECTRONICS INDIA (P) LTD 40/1270, VASUDEVA BUILDINGS, T.D.ROAD, ERNAKULAM KOCHI-11 REPRESENTED BY AUTHORISED SIGNATORY PRAMOD PILLAI. BY ADV. SRI.ARIKKAT VIJAYAN MENON SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON SRI.MAHESH V.MENON RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KVAT SPECIAL CIRCLE-1 ERNAKULAM. 2. INTELLINGENCE INSPECTOR COMMERCIAL TAXES SQUAD NO.III PALAKKAD. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.P.PRADEEP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 30021 OF 2007 Y ===================== Dated this the 11th day of October, 2007 J U D G M E N T On account of the detention of goods at the check post, the petitioner has approached this court challenging Ext.P3 and the allegation is basically that the value shown in Exhibits P1 and P2 delivery notes vary. While in Ext.P1 value shown is Rs.2,94,599.97, it is only Rs.294/- in Ext.P2. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that it was only a clerical omission 2. It is submitted by the learned Government pleader that the number of the delivery note was not disclosed at the check post. 3. These are all matters for enquiry following Ext.P2 and presently I am concerned only with the goods, whether it should be detained till then. I am satisfied that in this case also enquiry is to be held and the goods can be released. 4. Accordingly, it is directed that the goods detained in terms of Ext.P2 and the vehicle shall be released to the petitioner WPC 30021/07 : 2 : executing a simple bond without surety. Thereafter the enquiry will continue and the parties will be guided by the order that is to be passed. Writ petition is disposed of. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp