1-26 % 26.05.2010 Present: Mr. Vinay Sharma, Counsel for plaintiff with all the three plaintiffs in person. Ms. Jyoti Kaira , Counsel for defendants with al l the four defendants in person. + I.A. No. 16043/2009 fu/Q 39 R 1 & 2 CPC) * Dismissed, as infructuous. I.A. No.7303/2010 (u/0 23 R 3 CPC) in CS(OS) No. 2352/ 2009 This suit for partition, possession and permanent injunction, stands settled between the parties and this joint application has been moved by both sides stating that this suit be disposed of the settlement arrived at amongst them. This application is signed by the parties to this suit and is accompanied by their Affidavits, who are present in the Court and they state that this settlement is being acted upon, whereby payments have been made by way of bank drafts by the defendants to the plaintiffs, as detailed in Para-3 of the Compromise Deed (Annexure-A) arrived at between the parties and that defendants No. 1 to 3 (i.e. Mr. Kushal Chand Taneja, Mr. Chandershekhar Taneja and Mr. Narender Kumar Taneja) are in actual physical possession of the property in question CS(OS) No. 2352 of2009 Page P Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified it and shall remain in the suit property without formal partition. Meaning thereby, the suit property would be jointly and severally owned by defendants No. 1 to 3. This suit is disposed of in terms of the Compromise Deed (Annexure-A). Parties shal l remain bound by the terms, specifically Clause-2, as contained in the Compromise Deed (Annexure-A). This suit and pending application are accordingly disposed of. May 26, 2010 rs unit Gaur, J. CS(OS) No. 2352 of2009 Page 2