HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DB: Hon'ble Shri Sunil Kumar Sinha & Hon'ble Shri Radhe Shvam Sharma. JJ. Writ Appeal No.139 /201 1 Appellant/ Petitioner Nl»»8ii^ Respondents Versus 1. 2. 3. 8. Smt. Padma, S/o. Hoskumar, aged about 30 years, R/o. Village Budbuda, Tahsil Baramkela, District Raigarh (CG) Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur (CG) The Additional Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Baramkela, district Raigarh (CG) Smt. Sumitra, W/o. Radheshyam Pobiya, R/o. Village Budbuda, Tahsil Baramkela, District Raigarh (CG) (Applicant) Smt. Usha bai (forge name Janki Bai), D/o. Amar Singh, W/o. Ashok Kumar, R/o. Village Budbuda, Tahsil Baramkela, District Raigarh (CG) Smt. Jeetesini Bai W/o. Ramkrishna, R/o. Village Bheekhampara, Tahsil Baramkela, District Raigarh (CG) Smt. Gayatri, W/o. Ramesh Kumar Malti, R/o. Village Budbuda, Tahsil- Baramkela, Djstrict Raigarh (CG) Smt. Meera @ Uma, W/o. Shivkumar Rawt, R/o. Village Budbuda, Tahsil Baramkela, district Raigarh (CG) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Panchayat & Welfare Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) ^- ^ '-.^ ^^"A'^^ -<^ 1v .£F . ^^^:^ W.A.No.l39/:2011 Writ Appeal under Section 2 sub-Section (11 of the Chhattisaarh Hlah Courts fAppeal to Division Bench) Act. 2006. Present: Shri Roop Naik, counsei for the appellant. Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, Dy. Advocate General for the State/ respondents 1,2 &9, on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (25th August,2011.) Theiolloy^na order ofthe Courtvwis passed bv Sunil Kumar Sinha, JL Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that after passing of the remand order dated 21.5.2010 by the Commissioner and dismissal ofthe Writ Petition (S) No.2856/2010, challenging the said order of remand by the appellant/petitioner, respondent No.4 herein has been appointed as Anganbadi worker by a fresh order dated 7.4.2011. 3. In light of the above facts and circumstances, he seeks permission to withdraw this writ appeal with liberty to challenge the fresh appointment issued to respondent No.4, before appropriate forum. Bini 4. Permission granted. 5. Accordingly, writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty granted in favour ofthe appellant. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/- R.S. Sharma Judge