Civil Revision No.5038 of 2010 (O&M) - 1 - ***** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5038 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:12.08.2010. Joginder Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus Suridner Kaur and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Gourav Goel, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This revision petition is directed against order dated 20.07.2010 passed by the learned Trial Court by which evidence of the defendants/petitioners has been closed. Learned counsel for the petitioners has earnestly requested that one more opportunity may be given to the petitioners for leading their evidence in the interest of justice on payment of costs. However, the prayer of the petitioners cannot be acceded to because on 11.05.2010, last opportunity was granted to produce their evidence and the case was adjourned to 01.06.2010. On that date also, the defendants failed to produce their evidence and the adjournment was granted on the payment of cost of Rs.500/- in the Civil Revision No.5038 of 2010 (O&M) - 2 - ***** legal aid. The petitioners have even failed to deposit the said costs and on the next date of hearing again they also failed to lead their evidence as no DW was present. In these circumstances, no leniency can be shown to the petitioners for affording them one more opportunity on payment of costs because the said opportunity was given to them by the learned Trial Court on 01.06.2010, which they did not avail. Thus, I do not find any error in the order of the learned Court below and as such the present revision petition is dismissed, however, without any order as to costs. August 12, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod JUDGE