IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.41435 of 2011 ====================================================== Nasim Ahmad Khan .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== 2 09-12-2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323, 406, 418 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of extracting Rs. 85,000/- on assurance to get employment in Dubai. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the complainant in her S.A. admitted that the police case was lodged earlier for the same offence in which the investigation was pending. The final form of the same has been brought on record, as Annexure-B/1, which reflects that the investigation was closed due to lack of evidence. Considering the fact that the learned court below ought not to have proceeded in complaint case keeping in view of provisions Under Section 210 of the Cr.P.C. and the fact that police found accusation false, let above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gopalganj in connection with Complaint Case No. 693 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Amrendra Kumar/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)