W .2_ hearing 10 put forward his case and explain the alleged irreguiaJities as according to the petitioner, the petitioner has not cammitied any irregularity causing loss to the tune of Rs. 1:27,761/-. Be that as it may, without going into the merits of the case as basic principles of natural justice and fair play in action has not been followed, no order for recovery of money, without holding proper enquiry and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, can be passed as this is punitive in nature and visits with civil consequences. Learned counsei appearing for the State/respondents submits that it has been decided to initiate departmental enquiry against the petitioner. The r respondent/State is at liberty to take any steps required under the law. The impugwd order dated 14.01.2007 (Annexure Pfil), being Without following the basic principles of natural justice: deserves to be and is quashed. The petition is accordingly allowed to the above extent. No order asto costs. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Q)