1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2483/2008 M/s Laxman Udyog a Partnership firm through its partner ...Versus... The Manager, State Bank of India, Akola -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri R.K. Thakkar, Adv. for petitioner] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 20.06.2008 The only ground urged before me against the impugned order is that preliminary objection was raised to the maintainability of review petition on the ground that deficit court fees was paid thereon. I do not think that this can be ground for preliminary objection or for framing preliminary issue. However, if the respondent is liable to pay the court fees on review petition or there is a deficit, the same shall be recovered from the respondent in accordance with law by the Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Nagpur. Writ Petition stands disposed of. JUDGE ssw