. . 31 $-* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M[C. 156/2011& Cr1. M.A. No. 668/2011 ANE B60KS P.LTD. & ANR. Petitioner Through Mr. Harash Vardan & Mr. Abhishek Maihotra, Advocates versus STATE & ANR. Respondent Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State with Insp. B.P. Sharma. Mr. Ajay Burman & Mr. Rajesh Harnal, Advocates for R-2. CORA1vI: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER % 25.03.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 195/2010 under Section 63 Copyright Act , registered at P.S. Darya Ganj, Delhi on the complaint of Respondent No. 2 Swami(Dr.) Parthasarthy. As per the complaint it is alleged that the Petitioners infringed the copyright in the literary work of the Complainant titled "Transforming Personality From Emotional Intelligence to Spiritual Intelligence" and "Human Values and Management, 20 Key Principles for Modern Management". During the pendency of the investigation the Petitioners and Respondent No.2 have amicably resolved the matter andi a memorandum of understanding dated 7 thi January, 2011 is Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified LI placed on recrd as Ex. 'C' to the present petition at pages 40 to 44 of the paper-book. Respondent No.. 2 who is present in person and is identified by his learned counsel states that the he has amicably resolved the matter with the Petitioners and in terms of the settlement he has received a sum of 7 lacs vide pay order bearing No. '232188' dated 4" January, 2011. He further states that since no more claims are left towards the Petitioner, he does not wish to pursue with the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings arising therefrom. The Petitioner No.1 is a company represented through the Petitioner No.2. The resolution authorizing the Petitioner No.2 has been filed at page 52 of the paper-book. The Petitioner No.2 on his behalf and on behalf of the Petitioner Nd. 1 and Petitioner No. 3 who are present in Court and are identified byhe learned counsel and the investigating officer state that since the matter has been between them, they would withdraw the civil suit being CS(OS) 17952010 filed by them before this Court. They also state that they have no objection if the Respondent No.2 obtains a fresh International Standard Paprbook No.(ISPN) in respect of these two books and get the same published from any other publisher. They state that they , will not use this ISPN for any of their books. . The paties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free V4H4N 11. PPrTh i) 'eè ¶18/oe, ^r - -\\R%N I Nv" will, volition iand without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. There is no legal impediment in quashing the abovernentioied FIR and proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 195/2010 under Section 63 Copyright Act registered at P.S. Darya Ganj, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are • hereby quashed. Parties ! have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment, of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of.. Order dasti. MUKTA GUPTA,J MARCH 25,2011/dk ws gvt3l (ii QO (2' • J1io44 6k) 'V )