IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.20422 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: December 21, 2006 Ram Karan ….Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others …. Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI PRESENT: Shri S.P.Khatri, Advocate for the petitioner. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral). Notice of motion to the respondents. On the asking of Court, Shri Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Copies of the writ petition have been supplied to the learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner claims himself to be an oustee and as such claims the allotment of plot in the aforesaid category. He had also filed an application for the allotment of 1 kanal plot. However, the said application filed by the petitioner has been rejected and the petitioner has been communicated that since his 8 marlas of land had been released, therefore, he was not entitled to the allotment of plot. It has been averred by the petitioner that the total land measuring 68 kanals and 9 marlas belonging to the petitioner was CWP NO.20422 of 2006 -2- acquired and, therefore, mere release of 8 marlas of land which was the joint holding of the petitioner alongwith the other persons could not be taken to be a circumstance to reject the claim of the petitioner. On November 29,2006, the Chief Administrator, HUDA had appeared before us in connection with hearing of CWP No.15433 of 2006 and other connected matters and had made a detailed statement. A large number of cases were disposed of on the basis of the aforesaid statement made by the Chief Administrator. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the present case, we dispose of the present petition also in terms of the order passed in CWP No.15433 of 2006 decided on November 29,2006. A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. (Viney Mittal) Judge December 21, 2006 (M.M.S. Bedi) KD Judge