IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 812 (S/S) of 2010 Mohd. Ashraf S/o Late Sri Abdul Khairati ….Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …. Respondents. Mr. B.S. Negi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.C. Tewari, learned Brief Holder for the respondents. (Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J.) Heard Mr. B.S. Negi, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. K.C. Tewari, Brief Holder appearing on behalf of the respondents. By way of this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought the writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to send the petitioner for training of Survey Kanungo with immediate effect. Further prayer is also made for issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to decide the representation of petitioner dated 31.8.2010, Annexure No.6 to the writ petition. During the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the respondent No.3, be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure No.6 to the writ petition), by a speaking and reasoned order and the writ petition may be disposed of today. Prayer is innocuous. The respondent No.3 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner, annexed as Annexure No.6 to the writ petition, by a speaking and reasoned 2 order thereon, within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S. Verma, J.) Dated: 09-09-2010 ISB