IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1963 of 2010 DABLU SINGH @ PREM SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 6.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Mahua P.S. case No. 209 of 2009 dated 13.6.2009 registered under section 394 of the Indian penal Code. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that he is not named in the first information report as an accused. No incriminating article has been recover either from his house or from his possession. It is also submitted that during the course of investigation co-accused Baiju Mahto has been arrested and he is said to have made a confessional statement before the police where he has named some persons including the petitioner as an accused. Learned counsel for the State has pointed out that it is a case of high way robbery and there are ample materials to show the complicity of the petitioner in crime in question. It is further stated that petitioner is at least accused in two criminal cases. In that view of the matter, prayer for anticipatory bail made on behalf of the petitioner is rejected. He must surrender in the court below within four weeks from today and, if so advised, - 2 - seek regular bail. If such a petition is filed in the court below, then the same may be disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. (Birendra Prasad Verma, j) M.Rahman