Crl. Misc. No.M-28525 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-28525 of 2011 Date of Decision: September 21, 2011 Amarjit Kaur …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) On account of absence of petitioner on one date of hearing in proceedings in a private complaint, non-bailable warrants have been issued against her raising an apprehension of arrest. Petitioner seems to have not filed a petition before the Sessions Court under Section 438 Cr.P.C. or an application before the Special Court explaining the reasons for non-appearance on August 11, 2011. Prima facie, the plea put-forth by the petitioner appears to be correct taking into consideration her previous conduct that she had been regularly appearing before the trial Court. Crl. Misc. No.M-28525 of 2011 [2] This petition is disposed of as premature with a direction to the petitioner to appear before the trial Court on October 12, 2011 by moving an application and explain the reasons for non-appearance and offer fresh bail bonds. The said application will be decided on the same day. The trial Court will consider the said reasons and in case satisfied, the said Court will accept the fresh bail bonds furnished by the petitioner. It is directed that in case the said Court opts not to accept the plea of the petitioner and is not satisfied with the explanation offered for alleged non-appearance on August 11, 2011, petitioner will not be arrested for a period of next 10 days to enable the petitioner to avail alternative remedy under Section 438 Cr.P.C. by filing a petition before the Sessions Court. September 21, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE