1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Civil Application No.6070 of 2007 IN First Appeal No.1797 of 2007 M/s.Bhattad Brothers. .. .. Applicants (Orig.Respondents) v/s. The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. .. Respondents (Orig.Appellants) Mr.Uday P. Warunjikar for applicants. Mr.V.Y. Sanglikar for respondents. ---- CORAM : SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J. Dated : 7th January 2008 P.C. : 1.On 12.6.2007, the appeal came to be disposed of after negotiations between the parties fructified into a settlement for payment of enhanced rent at market value by the appellants to the respondents. The statement of the appellants came to be accepted by the court. The statement made in writing was agreed upon by the respondents' Advocate. The respondents in the appeal are applicants herein. That statement was thus:- 2 “The Appellant is agreeable to pay rent at prevalent rate in Karad on the basis of actual lease with any public body for like premises in Karad.” The statement denotes the agreement to pay rent at market rate. Hence, the order shows the appellants' consent to pay enhanced rent at the market value. The respondents in the appeal (applicants herein) have applied for clarification, modification or amendment of the order dated 12.6.2007. 2.It is argued on behalf of the applicants that there is an anomaly between the order dated 12.6.2007 and the statement dated 12.6.2007. I find no anomaly. The order, therefore, does not require any clarification, modification or amendment. Hence, prayer (a) is rejected. 3.The respondents herein (appellants in the appeal) have, as per their written statement dated 12.6.2007, given a break up of the revised rent payable by them to the applicants herein i.e. at the market rate as calculated by the respondents herein. That covers the period from prior to the appeal until after the disposal of the appeal. The enhanced rent calculated by the respondents herein has been sent by them by Registered A.D. to the applicants herein. It is refused. It is seen that the respondents herein have 3 complied with their statement. The applicants' Advocate states that the registered packet has not been received. The respondents' Advocate agrees to resend it to the applicants. 4.Consequently, for any further rent also, no further clarification, modification or amendment is required. The application is rejected. (SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.)