IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.No.M-21124 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision : 29.11.2011 Rakesh Kumar ....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab and others ....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr.S.S.Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Gill, DAG, Punjab, for the respondents-State. Mr.Balbir Singh Sewak, Advocate, for respondent Nos.4 to 6. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuing direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to take action against respondent Nos.4 to 6 in case FIR No.61 dated 20.06.2011, registered under Sections 452, 323, 324, 379, 34 IPC, at Police Station Mahilpur, Distt. Hoshiarpur on the allegations that the police was not taking any action. Reply has been filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 by way of affidavit of Bhupinder Singh Thind, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division, Garhshankar, Distt. Hoshiarpur. In the said reply, it has been stated that action has been taken by the police and respondent Nos.5 and 6 Criminal Misc.No.M-21124 of 2011(O&M) -2- have been arrested whereas respondent No.4 has been found innocent. Learned counsel for the petitioner has protested against the finding in favour of Ram Pal, Patwari-respondent No.4. Be that as it may, in the present petition, the grievance of the petitioner with regard to inaction cannot be said to be now alive. Consequently, this petition is dismissed. Of course, as against any alleged favour, which may have been done to respondent No.4, the petitioner has his independent remedy. (AJAY TEWARI) November 29, 2011 JUDGE mamta