CR No.6117 of 2009 - 1 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR No.6117 of 2009 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 23.10.2009 **** Suresh Kumari . . . . Petitioner VS. Pepsu Road Transport Corporation & another . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. J.S. Cooner, Advocate for the petitioner **** SURYA KANT J.(ORAL) (1). The petitioner has filed a claim petition for compensation for the alleged damages caused to her truck in a motor- vehicular accident. After granting sufficient opportunities, the petitioner’s evidence was closed by the Tribunal vide its order dated 12.09.2008. (2). Instead of challenging that order, the petitioner moved an application to lead additional evidence which has been dismissed by the Tribunal vide the impugned order dated 30.09.2009. (3). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner at some length, I do not find any genuine ground to interfere with the impugned order. CR No.6117 of 2009 - 2 - (4). The Tribunal has rightly observed in para 5 and 6 of the order under challenge that sufficient opportunities were granted to the petitioner to lead her evidence and she has already even examined six witnesses also, besides tendering seven documents after availing several opportunities. The petitioner’s application for additional evidence was not based upon any new evidence and/or subsequent event(s). (5). Dismissed. (6). Dasti. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 23.10.2009 vishal shonkar