IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13211 of 2011 1. Jitendra Yadav 2. Suresh Yadav 3. Bikash Pandey ---Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar ----Opp.Party ----------- 03 26.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners apprehending arrest in connection with Kateya P.S. case no 18 of 2011 under Sections 387, 379 and 120B/34 of the Penal Code have approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail. As per allegation in the F.I.R., Ex-mukhiya of the village , namely, Chandrasen Yadav had demanded ‘rangdari’ amount from the informant and subsequently at his instance the vehicle was forced to park at the particular place until the amount is paid. Petitioners are alleged to be the associates of aforesaid mukhiya. Learned counsel submits that the informant later on retracted from the F.I.R. and filed an application/affidavit to that effect. It is submitted that considering the said aspect of the matter aforesaid Chandrasen Yadav has since been privileged with anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. no. 9801 of 2011. Perused the records of Cr. Misc. no. 9801 of 2011. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 04 week from today petitioners, named above, be enlarged on 2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Kateya P.S. case no. 18 of 2011, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. It is made clear that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family member of the petitioners. Sym (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)