1 LPA69/09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.69 OF 2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2785 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1293 OF 2006 Rajendra L. Savant and others ...Appellants v/s Tararani Vidyapeeth and others ...Respondents Mr N.V. Bandiwadekar for Petitioners. Mr S.S. Patwardhan for Respondent No.1. Mr C.R. Sonawane, AGP for Respondent No.4. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND K.K. TATED JJ. DATE : 17TH JANUARY 2011. 2 LPA69/09 P.C. :- 1] Heard. Admit. By consent of the parties, heard finally. 2] The first appeal has been admitted for final hearing. In our opinion, if the Authority to whom the proceedings have been remanded back by the order which is impugned in the first appeal, is permitted to dispose off the proceedings, it may render the first appeal itself infructuous. It is also true that if blanket stay of the proceedings is granted and if ultimately the order is found to be valid, it may result in waste of time. In our opinion, therefore, following order would meet the ends of justice. 3] The proceedings pursuant to the order, which is impugned in the first appeal, may go on but the Joint Charity Commissioner shall not pass final order without seeking leave of this Court. The order of the learned Single Judge dated 4th 3 LPA69/09 December 2008, which is impugned in this appeal is modified to that extent. Appeal is disposed off. Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Private Secretary of this Court. Certified copy expedited. ( JUSTICE D.K. DESHMUKH ) ( JUSTICE K.K. TATED )