IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 982 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 982 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 982 OF 2006 Dnyaneshwari Kamalakar Bhagat. ] .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra & 2 ors. ] .. Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr. N.Pandit, AGP, for the respondents No.1 to 3. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 19TH APRIL, 2006 P.C. : . When the matter is called out, none present for the petitioner. Even otherwise, we have considered the order of the Caste Scrutiny Committee. On the Vigilance Officer conducting enquiry, it is found that insofar as uncle of the petitioner concerned, there were three entries. The School Certificate which is of 21/3/1949 shows the uncle as "Koli". The statement of the witnesses were recorded. Based on the statements, the Committee has given a finding that petitioner was unable to show by way of traits or characteristics, any : 2 : affinity to "Mahadeo Koli". These are purely findings of facts. The order does not suffer from any error apparent. In the light of that, Petition dismissed. Sd/- [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]