IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 7664 of 2008 Between: M/s. Pioneer Distilleries LImited, Regd. Office 8-2-311/C, Mithila Nagar, Road No. 10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-34, Factory at Balapur Village, Dharmabad Taluk, Nanded District, Maharastra State, Rep. byits Deputy Manager-Cum-Authorised Signatory N. Vijaya Kumar, S/o. N.V. Koteswara Rao, Aged 54 Years. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2 GSR Sugars Private Limited, Maagi - 503 302, Nizamsagar Mandal, Nizamabad District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.E.MARUTHI RAJA Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated above, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not considering the application of the petitioner dated 04-04-2008 seeking permission to lift the Molasses by the petitioner from Andhra Pradesh State to its factory premises situated in Maharastra State from the premises of the 2nd respondent Sugar Factory in Andhra Pradesh as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction apart from being violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to lift the said stock of molasses from Andhra Pradesh to its business premises in Maharastra State.” Sri E.Maruthi Raja, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition after allowing respondent No.1 a reasonable time to dispose of application, dated 04.04.2008 of the petitioner. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, WPMP.No.10079 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 9th APRIL, 2008 kvni