IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 16TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 25TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 34523 of 2010(M) ---------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. T.E.SAAMEER, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.IBRAHIM, THADAVANEL HOUSE, ERATTUPETTA 1-2, KOTTAYAM. 2. MUSHIN P., PANACHITHATTEL HOUSE, MARANCHERY P.O., MALAPPURAM. 3. PRASANTH S., KODOORETHU HOUSE, KOONAMKARA P.O., R.PERINAD. 4. SUBIN KRISHNAN, KUNNEL HOUSE, VAZHOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM. BY ADVS. SRI.M.J.THOMAS SMT.RUBY K.JOSE RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM – 686 562. 2. THE REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM-686 562. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM-686 562. 4. THE PRINCIPAL, CARMEL ENGINEERING COLLEGE, PERUNADU, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 515. R1 TO R3 BY ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G. UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 34523 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 16th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners submit that they appeared for MBA examination and failed in some papers. They submitted Exts.P1 to P4 applications for revaluation and filed this writ petition seeking expeditious revaluation and declaration of results. 2. I heard standing counsel appearing for the University also. 3. Having regard to the facts pointed out, it is directed that the University shall complete the revaluation sought for and declare the result of the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, provided the applications have been received and are otherwise in order. 4. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment along with the writ petition before the 3rd respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp