IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Contempt Petition No.11 of 2004 Munna Babu Verma, S/o Sri Hari Shankar Verma, R/o Village and Post Menda, Tehsil and District Hathras. ……Petitioner Versus M.R. Arya, Executive Engineer Electricity Distribution Division Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. …….Respondent. Mr. M.S. Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Jyoti Joshi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. B.D. Upadhyay, Advocate for the respondent. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this contempt petition, the petitioner has prayed to punish the respondent for flouting the order dated 22-01-2003 passed by this Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 3586 of 2003, Munna Babu Verma Vs. U.P. State Electricity Board and another. Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that in compliance of the Court’s order dated 22-01-2003, the decision was taken by the respondent authority on 07-11-2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that on 07-11-2009, the claim of the petitioner was rejected by the respondent authority, therefore, the contempt petition has rendered infructuous The contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous. 2 Notices issued against the respondent are hereby discharged. However, if the petitioner feels aggrieved and if so advised, he may assail the order passed by the respondent before appropriate forum as provided under the law available to the petitioner. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly. (B.S.Verma, J.) 16-07-2010 MK