1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. APPEAL NO.932 OF 1998 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2482 OF 1998 IN SUIT NO. 2103 OF 1998 Credit Agricole Indosuez & Ors. ...Appellants. Vs. Patheja Forgings & Auto parts and Manufactures Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Shri Sandeep Bhimekar i/b. Wadia Gandhy & Co. for the appellant. Ms. Ketki Lotankar i/b. M. K. Ambalal & Co. for the respondent Nos.12. ..... CORAM : R. M. S.KHANDEPARKAR & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. January 25, 2007. P.C. The learned Advocate for the appellant states that subsequent to the passing of the impugned order, in view of the change in the law, all the original proceedings have been transferred to the DRT and even the Court Receiver appointed by the ad-interim order has been replaced by the DRT Receiver. In these circumstances, nothing survives in the matter and the 2 appeal, in the facts and circumstances of the case, as observed above, is rendered infructuous and is accordingly disposed of. No other as to costs. ( R. M. S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.) ( DR.D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)