IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI TUESDAY, THE 18TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 27TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 12931 of 2008(M) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- PREMJI, KUMAR BHAVAN, PALAYAM KUNNU ELAKAMAN DESOM, AYIROOR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.M.PREM SMT.K.P.SANTHI SRI.S.S.HUSSAIN SRI.P.K.NIJOY RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ATTINGAL. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARKALA. 4. PRASANNA RAM, RAJU BHAVAN, PALAYAM KUNNU, ELAKAMAN DESOM, AYIROOR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. VIPIN KUMAR, KOLLANTAZHIKATHU VEEDU, KARAVARAM DESOM, AYIROOR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SALIM P.A. FOR R1 TO R3 ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP FOR R4, R5 SRI.S.SUNIL FOR R4, R5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO. 12931/2008-M APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE F.I.R. IN CRIME NO.113/08 OF DATED 17/02/2008 OF THE VARKALA POLICE STATION. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 15/02/2005 FILED BY DECEASED PREMLAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 08/12/2004 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, VARKALA IN I.A.NO.2577 OF 2044 IN O.S.NO.304 OF 2004. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R4(a): COPY OF THE F.I.R., 19/02/2008 IN CRIME NO.118/2008 OF VARKALA POLICE STATION. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Rs/ K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C. HARI RANI,JJ ============================== W.P.(C)NO. 12931 OF 2008 ============================ DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2008 JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair,J. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking police protection to his life in the wake of alleged threat from the part of respondents 4 and 5. Respondents 4 and 5 submitted that the allegations made against them are absolutely unfounded and they have no intention whatsoever to physically harm or harass the petitioner. This Court has already passed an interim order on 11-4-2008. In view of the said interim order, no further orders are required. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of maintaining that order. Sd/- K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE Sd/- M.C. HARI RANI, JUDGE ks.