THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH W.P.NO.22237 OF 2004 O R D E R Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel for the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (for short ‘the Corporation’). 2. The case of the petitioner as stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition is that he was appointed as Conductor on 6.1.1976 and while serving as such, by order dated 4.10.1977 he was removed from service and in the administrative appeal, by order dated 4.1.1978 he was appointed as fresh Booking Clerk, as a measure of punishment for a period of one year and posted at Asifabad Depot, but however, his services were taken as Conductor. By order dated 6.10.1978, his services as Conductor were regularized with effect from 11.9.1978, but his grievance is that the respondents failed to fix his pay and allowances in the substantive post of Conductor, though he made number of representations. His further case is that on 11.4.1980 again he was removed from service on the allegation of cash irregularities and challenging the same, he filed I.D.No.348/1986 before the Labour Court, Godavarikhani and by order dated 2.11.1987, the I.D. was allowed and he was directed to be reinstated with full backwages and the same was also confirmed in W.P.No.12883/1988. As the petitioner was appointed as Conductor and his pay was not fixed, he filed W.P.No.5742/2003 and the same was allowed by order dated 23.9.2003 with a direction to fix the pay of the petitioner and pay arrears and the same was partly complied with after filing C.C.No.943/2004 and the contempt case was closed with a liberty to approach the appropriate forum if the amounts paid are not correct. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that there is no break in his service with effect from 4.1.1978 and that he was regularized as Conductor with effect from 11.9.1978 and that though he was working continuously as Conductor, he was not being paid the allowances attached to the post. His further grievance is that his juniors were promoted and that he is drawing lesser salary than them. His case is that though he made a detailed representation on 20.8.2004 before the 2nd respondent for consideration of his case for promotion and for fixation of pay and arrears, the same was not considered till date. 4. No counter affidavit is filed. 5. The above facts need no reiteration and the petitioner had already undergone substantial rounds of litigation. It is to be seen that this court allowed the W.P.No.5742/2003 by order dated 23.9.2003 and the case of the petitioner is that he was paid only part of the arrears due to him and that no particulars were furnished to him and that his juniors were promoted and they are drawing higher salary than him and further though he made a representation on 20.8.2005 before the 2nd respondent, the same was not considered till date. 6. In view of the above facts and circumstances, and in the interest of justice, the 2nd respondent – Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C. Karimnagar, Regional, Karimnagar District, shall consider the detailed representation of the petitioner dated 20.8.2005 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. AVS ------------------------------------ 09.06.2008