... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.487 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.487 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.487 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.486 OF 2005 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri R.Sathyanarayanan for the Applicant. Shri D.P.Adsule, A.P.P for the State. Shri J.P.Shah for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : DECEMBER 19, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 19, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 19, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocate for the Applicant and the Advocate appearing for the second Respondent. The Application is strongly opposed by the Advocate appearing for the second Respondent. Delay is of about 106 days in preferring an Application for leave to prefer Appeal. In view of the averments made in the Application, delay deserves to be condoned. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). Place the Application for leave on board on 25th January, 2007. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE