CRM No. M-16997 of 2011 (1) In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-16997 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 6.7.2011 Naresh Kumar ..... Petitioner vs State of Haryana ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. J. S. Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shalini Attri, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who is an accused in FIR No. 77 dated 23.4.2011, registered under Sections 323, 498-A, 406, 506, 34 IPC at Police Station City Chandhut, District Palwal. The petitioner is the husband of Manju, whose father has lodged the present FIR. The petitioner is serving in ITBP. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after the registration of the FIR, father of the petitioner and his younger brother were arrested and the dowry articles were also recovered. This was the main ground on which the bail application was dismissed by the learned court below. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submitted that jewellary is yet to be recovered from the petitioner. The other dowry articles viz. Furniture, clothes have been recovered. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I do not find it to be a fit case in which custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required. The dowry articles such as furniture, clothes and other dowry items have been recovered. Regarding jewellary it can not be said that how much jewellary was given at the time of marriage and in whose possession the same was. This court would not like to put the petitioner in custody merely for recovery of jewellary. CRM No. M-16997 of 2011 (2) The petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 18.7.2011 at 10.00 a.m. and subsequently as and when called. However, in case of arrest, he shall be released on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. He shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. A perusal of the file produced by the learned State counsel shows that it has not been page marked. This court in CRM No. M-3990 of 2011 Awadesh Kumar Chaturvedi vs State of Haryana decided on 1.3.2011, had specifically directed that all the files maintained by the investigating officers are to be page marked and got signed from the Presiding Officer of the court concerned, whenever produced there. Finding this, prima facie, to be contempt of court, notice is issued to ASI Satbir Singh, Police Station Chandhut, District Palwal, to show cause as to why proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act be not initiated against him. Notice has been served upon ASI Satbir Singh, who is present in court. He seeks time to file reply. Adjourned to 25.7.2011 6.7.2011 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge