IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 9TH APRIL 2010 / 19TH CHAITHRA 1932 RP.No. 361 of 2010(B) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.2011/2010 Dated 05/03/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER: PETITIONER -------------------------------- SREE ANJANEYA MEDICAL TRUST, KANCHAS COMPLEX, OPP. INDOOR STADIUM, CALICUT - 673 004, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY DR. SUDHA ANIL. BY ADV. SRI.P.SANJAY SMT.A.PARVATHI MENON RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, NEW DELHI. 2. KERALA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH AND ALLIED SCIENCES, M.G. KAVU, MEDICAL COLLEGE.P.O, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 3. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA (MCI), CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O, MALAPPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL-T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------- R.P.No.361 of 2010 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of April, 2010 ORDER The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider the application afresh filed by the petitioner in the light of Ext.P15 as well as Ext.P8 the revised essentiality certificate concerning 150 seats in the Medical College. It is pointed out by the review petitioner that since the word “afresh” find a place in the paragraph 5 of the judgment, the first respondent is treating it as a fresh application and the same is not being forwarded to the Medical Council of India. Accordingly the Review Petition is filed seeking to review the judgment. 2. When the writ petition was admitted, this Court passed an interim order dated 20/1/2010 as follows: “There will be a direction to the first respondent to keep alive the application of the petitioner for the year 2010-2011 until further orders” Therefore, already there was a direction to the first respondent to keep alive the application until further orders. 3. What is intended by this Court was to consider the application as it was submitted at the right point of time. R.P.No.361 of 2010 : 2 : 4. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent also. 5. The Review petition is disposed of making it clear that application of the petitioner need not be treated as fresh one and all other incidents will follow. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the application has to be forwarded to the Medical Council on or before 15th May, 2010 and they will have to conduct the inspection and file a report. Therefore, the application will be forwarded forthwith on production of a copy of this order to the Medical Council of India. No costs. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE skj