1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1764 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.313 OF 2009 AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.237 OF 2009 AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.270 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1764 OF 2009 Tarvinder Singh Applicant versus State of Maharashtra and others Respondents Mr.Shirish Gupte, Sr.Counsel i/by F.F.Associates for applicant. M.S.Mohite for respondent no.2. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1240 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.312 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1240 OF 2009 Ramesh Omkarshankar Chhangani Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents A.P.Mundargi, Sr.Counsel i/by A.P.Mhatre for applicant. Miss S.V.Gajre, APP for State. M.S.Mhatre for respondent no.2. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 13th July 2009 2 PC : 1. Not on board. Taken on board. Perused Criminal Application Nos. 312 of 2009 and 313 of 2009. Reliance has been placed on an agreement of compromise annexed to the criminal applications. The said document records complete settlement between the parties in connection with all pending criminal as well as civil cases. The prayer made by the learned counsel appearing for the applicant as well as the original complainant is that the proceedings be quashed in view of complete settlement between the parties. 2. I have perused the document of compromise which is admittedly executed by the parties. Considering the nature of the offence alleged and considering the complete settlement between the parties in all pending criminal and civil disputes, a case is made out for quashing the criminal proceedings by exercising the power under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 3. Accordingly, Criminal Application No.1764 of 2009 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Criminal Application No.1240 of 2009 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Other pending criminal applications do not survive and the same are disposed of. (A.S.OKA, J.)