<.N sl<SNi%S c^\ NlaLE BENCS -yZ7 IN THE WGH COURT OF JUDrcATURE AT BHASPUR (C.Cr.l W.PrsNo...........^5..l....../200§ ~»:=' PETITIONBR: ^Silbrious Xalxo D/o Shri Benjamm Xabco, ^ •^ cX^A- about 51 year's Working as Asst. .^-^'"./f ..••^•' .-• Teacher. (Educationl Department) at Govt. <^"'^/ Girls Higher Secondary School, Sarangarh, x\-''' R/o Surjula, Post Kalaru Distt Raigarh (C.G.) ^y ''•^^'y VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^\ <*y y^ 1.. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretaiy Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ^t;^ o.^—^ ,<^ District Raigarh (C.G.) ^3'. Collector, Raigarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) S6 PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSVANCE OF APPROPtOATE WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND CBRTIORARI ETC. OR IMRECTION/ORDER OF LIKE NTURE E'TC:. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINOLE BENCH : HON'BUE MR.SATBH K. AaNIHOTRI. J. Petitioner WRIT PETITION (S.»N0.271 OF 2007 SilbriousXalxo -«' Resoondents State <rf Chhattisgarti and ottiers Petttioner WRIT PETITION (S.»N0.276 OF 2007 Aruna ChancWkapure versus Respondents : State of Chhatli^arh andothers Petitioner WRTT PETITION (S.1 N0.^7 OF M07 ClementinaTttkey Respondents State ®fChhatUsgaitiand ottiers Present : Mr. RahulJha, counsel for the paBtioners. Mre. Anju Ahiqa, Deputy Govemment Advocate fw the State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on 19t" Day of January, M07) L^imed counsel appearing far fce patfies Jointly submit that the facte and quesUonof law involved in the present teteh ofwiit ^ :^^'s^^@^^ petitions are squarety covered by the decision af thte Gourt in the case of Madan Slngh vs. Sfate of ChhaWsgarh aml attiws<fM^t Petiflon (S.) No.5742 of 2006), dated 27-10-2006. 2. For the afcremenUoned r^sons, the wrtt petifens are disposed of in terms ofthe decision ofthis Court in themaUeri»fMadnn Singh vs. Stata af Chhattisgarh and ottws (Supra). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of ttiis order t»placetf <m the raeord <rf Ihe connectedwrtt petitions. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Qopal b~. r