IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION AS NO.780/2010 IN S.A. ST. 12428/2010 KHEMDAS DANGRE ..VS.. DEVIDAS PATIL Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or judges Orders. CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE: 22 /10 / 2010 Heard Shri Kadam, the learned counsel for the appellant and Shri Pudke, the learned counsel for the respondent. The learned counsel for the respondents strongly opposes prayer made in this civil application and states that the applicant has not stated any sufficient cause for condonation of delay. The learned counsel for the respondent relies on the judgment reported in 2007(1)Mh.L.J. 807 to substantiate his submission. However, on hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the application and the reply filed thereto, it appears that the applicant has shown sufficient cause for belatedly filing the second appeal. Since the appellant was ill for a number of days and since the file of the first appeal was traceable in the office of the counsel for the applicant, it appears that there was some delay in filing the appeal. Hence for the reasons stated in the civil application, the delay in filing the second appeal is condoned, subject to payment of costs of Rs.500/-, in the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Nagpur within a period of 15 days. The judgment reported in 2007(1) Mh.L.J. 807 cannot be made applicable to the facts of this case. The civil application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of. JUDGE SMP.