1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3522 OF 2008 Pankaj Praful Bhayandarkar .. Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.Vishal Deshmukh for the applicant. Mr.J.P.Yagnik A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 15TH DECEMBER, 2008. DATED : 15TH DECEMBER, 2008. DATED : 15TH DECEMBER, 2008. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.448 of 2005 of Andheri police station, Mumbai. The said crime has been registered against the applicant and two others for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 452, 341, 342, 392, 397, 506(II) r/w 34 of IPC and under sections 3, 25 of the Arms Act and under section 135 of the Bombay Police Act. 3. The prosecution case is that on 21st November, 2005 at 1.45 pm the present applicant and two others committed robbery by using deadly weapons. The 2 2 2 applicant was absconding all throughout and he came to be arrested only on 28th April, 2008. After his arrest, the test identification parade was conducted by the police in which the complainant identified the applicant as one of the persons who entered her house and committed the alleged offence. The manner in which the offence has been committed I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Hence the application is rejected. . While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case without being influenced by the observations made in this order. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)