IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1983/2007 {Mahesh Sharma Versus Chief Financial Manager, G.E. Countrywide & Another} Date of Order :: 3rd July, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. S.S. Yadav for the petitioner BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The plaintiff – petitioner filed a suit for declaration and rendition of accounts in the trial court. An application for temporary injunction was also filed alongwith the suit. The trial court after considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties dismissed the application for temporary injunction of the petitioner. The trial court recorded a finding that there is no prima-facie case in favour of the petitioner. The balance of convenience and irreparable injury were also decided against the petitioner. Aggrieved with the same an appeal was preferred by the petitioner. The appellate court vide order datd 18th November, 2006 partly allowed the appeal and directed that in case the petitioner furnishes a bank guarantee of Rs. 55,000/-, -2- then the disputed vehicle may not be seized by the defendants. 3. It appears that the petitioner applied for loan to purchase a car but he failed to pay the monthly installment of the loan amount, therefore, the defendants initiated recovery proceedings. The defendants have every right to recover the due amount of loan from the petitioner. It is settled law that in the matter of money, there cannot be any irreparable injury to the plaintiff. I do not find any jurisdictional error in the orders passed by both the courts below. 4. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed in limine. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK