WP(C) 3945/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I A ANSARI Heard Mr. M. K. Sharma, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, and Mr. S. Baru ah, learned Central Government counsel, appearing on behalf of respondents. Having considered the fact that the petitioner’s father died in harness, that th e petitioner has applied to the respondents/authorities concerned for appointmen t on compassionate ground, this Court is of the view that it is, now, the duty o f the respondents/authorities concerned to examine the petitioner’s case in term s of the relevant policy and in accordance with law. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ petition is, as a greed to by the learned counsel for the parties concerned, disposed of with dir ection to the respondents/ authorities concerned to consider the petitioner’s ca se for appointment, on compassionate ground, in terms of the relevant scheme, wh ich the respondents may have, and in accordance with law and, upon such examinat ion, whatever decision is arrived at by the respondents/authorities concerned an d/or whatever order(s) is/are passed by the respondents/authorities concerned, t he same shall be communicated, in writing, to the petitioner. The whole exercis e, so directed, shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by the respondent No. 2, namely, Director Ge neral, Border Security Force, New Delhi. The petitioner may furnish to the respondent No. 2 a certified copy of this ord er along with copy of this writ petition and annexure thereto. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision, which may be taken by the res pondents/authorities concerned, or the order(s), which may be passed by the resp ondents/authorities concerned, the petitioner shall remain at liberty to take re course to such provisions of law as may be permissible.