IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2959 of 2006 MAHESH PRASAD SINGH Versus DR. MADAN MOHAN JHA & ORS ----------- 9. 14.5.2008. Court’s order has been complied with and payments have been made. Even after filing of the last supplementary show cause, upon consideration of the averments made in the rejoinder filed thereto, the University has made further payments. In the event petitioner has any grievance in relation to those, it shall be open to the petitioner to make an appropriate representation including pointing out clerical or arithmetical errors, if any. The substantial grievance of the petitioner is that his date of promotion has been advanced from 1986 to 1987 resulting in depletion of monetary benefits on account of pension and other terminal dues. This grievance cannot be sorted out in the present contempt application and, accordingly, while disposing of the contempt application, liberty of the petitioner is preserved for taking appropriate steps in relation thereto. dk ( Barin Ghosh, J. )