Crl. Misc. No.M-18974 of 2011 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-18974 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 20.06.2011 Ms. Akansha Bakshi ...Petitioner Versus Smt. Chandni Dutta and another ..Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Adish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... RAJESH BINDAL, J. The impugned order in the present case was passed on 25.05.2011. Respondent No.1 was granted permission to go abroad on her furnishing surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court to the tune of ` 10,00,000/- with an undertaking to appear before court on the date of hear- ing. Learned counsel for the petitioner sought to argue that the hus- band of the petitioner is already abroad and has been declared a proclaimed offender. There is apprehension that respondent No.1 may not return back. A perusal of the impugned order shows that the permission for returning of passport of respondent No.1 was granted subject to furnishing of her surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court to the tune of ` 10,00,000/- with an undertaking to appear before the Court on the date of hearing. Contention of the petitioner is that respondent No.1 is leaving the country on 23.6.2011 and she is aggrieved of the order passed by the Court below specially the terms and conditions for granting permission to go abroad. In case it is so, the petitioner should have approached to this Court immediately when the order was passed on 25.5.2011. Copy of the or- Crl. Misc. No.M-18974 of 2011 2 der was applied on 7.6.2011, which was prepared on 8.6.2011 but the pres- ent petitioner failed to approach to this court immediately when the order was passed. I do not find any reason to stop the respondent No.1 from going to abroad at this last stage. Dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 20.06.2011 sharmila