lirs^ll C^- ('y^ //!// W.P.(S)No. 53/^/2009 /-Rakesh Joshi S/o Shri Sohanlal Joshi <-:_ -^s^ ^^'b-"" Age about 44 years, '^\<AP ^-"'^:c--'.s^\.-''-' Ak >:' ^•!;> ^c- ^" R/o BalakAashramOrchha District- Narayanpur (C.G) VERSUS 1. State ofChhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Bakward Class Welfare Department, D.^.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Commissioner, Tribal Development Raipur (C.G) 3. The Secretary, MataRukaniani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dimmpal, Tah. & District-Jagdalpur (C.G) CONSTTTUTION HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRFT PETmON (S) No. 5318 of2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Rakesh Joshi. VERSUS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDERjymCLES 226 QF THE CONSTITUnON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotri, J. Present: Sliri S.P.Kale, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Law^'er for the State/respondents 1&2. QRDJ^RjtORM.) (Passed on 17m day of September, 2009) Heard leamed counsel for the parties. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision ofthis Court rendered in Smt A.Lall v, State of Chhattisgarh & Others , thus the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to decide his case in the light of aforestated decision, subject to verification asto whether the respondent No. 3-Institute is a Govemment Aided school and the petitioner is a teacher within the sanctioned strength. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within a period offour weeks from the date ofreceipt of the representation. 3. In view of foregoing, according to the leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives iti this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordmgly, the writ petition is disposed of Sd/- SatishK.Agnihott1 Judge Asmt 1 A»/'tA 2007 (l)BLJ 265