HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAEH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETlTiON (C) NO. 3015 of 2607 Petitioner Rajesh Kumar Jain S/o. Late Applicant Rajkumar Jain, Aged about-38 years, Occupation—Proprietor of Arihant Autoparts R/o. Quarter No. 241; Janta Quarter Nandnagar, Indore, Tahsil and Distt.-!ndere (MP) Versus Smt. Sandhya Jain Wi’o. Rajesh Kumar Jain, Aged about-'35 years, Housewife, 2. Akshay Jain S/o. Rajesh Kumar Jain, Aged about 10 years, Minor Guardian through-mother Smt. Sandhya Jain Both 1 & 2 are R/o.-C/o. Shri B. Anmet, Qutr. No. [3/03 of the Municipai Corporation Quarter, Shiks'nak Nagar, Durg, RS.- Durg, Tahsii—Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Single Bench :- Hon'bie Shri Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Respondents 1. Non-appHcants Present :- Mr. CR. Sahu, Advocate for the Petitioner. O R D E R (Passed on this 11m day of May, 2007) The petitioner is the husband of the respondent No. 1 and the father of the respondent No. 2, a minor child, The respondents/non-appiicants No. 1 and 2 fiied an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, being M.J.C. No. 40/07, before the Third Additional Principal, Family Court, Durg. The Third Additional Principal, Family Court, Durg, in the pending case, granted Rs. 1,000/- per month to the wife (respondent No. 1) and Rs. 5OOI— per month to the minor child (respondent No. 2) as maintenance. Being aggrieved, the petitioner has filed this petition impugning the said order on the ground that the total earning of the petitioner is Rs. 2000/-. The court beiow,after having considered aii the aspects that as a minor chiid is living with mother (respondent No. 1) and the petitioner has capacity to earn more amount, has granted the above stated amount. There is no infirmity‘ irreguiarity or iiiegaiity in the impugned order. Thus, this petition fiied under Articie 227 of the Constitution of india is rejected on the ground that the impugned order is just, proper and does not warrant any interference. As a resuit, this petition is dismissed summariiy. Sd/— Satish K. Agn‘ihotri Judge BI i , o i i i i