1I( IroP] ‘PP 4 I iUPiiIL[D sjU , ; pv IiTIIacJ AUOtUV O/3 i_uii )U XUOTUV qsOq1uucJJ OVN \ ddV 1?IiIS \ J)i1’flf JIA )JqUO ‘tL iT1-Uj I TO ‘°\ JO )q Sf11 W(J Qf)\ T \ T J J\r {f\r\iJV\{ JO LHfIOD IJDI1I JJ-IJ. rJI 1 (Insurer of Motor fl c le No.KA-02•Y-41611 2 Mr ‘. enkatesh 5/0 (Janga Flanurnaiah. ‘kjjalapalya Marikuppa Post Solur Hobli Magadi “laluk. l3angalore (R) District. (RC Owner of Motor Cycle) . . .RESPONDENTS (By Sn R.Jalprakash Ads. for R 1) (R 2 - Served) This MEA is filed under Section 113(11 of M.V Act against the Judgment & Award dated 16/01/2007 passed In M V.C No 1923/2006 on the file of Member MAC 1’- Ba igalore (it) partly alloiimg tht claim petition ror compensation and seeking enhancement fot eumpencaLion T u.s 1 A1’ 1\ C( ni1n. o i or Le ‘nb. th s ,ay “ii K Palil J dcli’ i id tht lollowirig. I. N :i- ii pe’i h’s the civmai i— •1irrvi’ agiiim• tlit laa13 -Lii . 11 1 or ‘. •Ie •‘ a i 1 i.a 6 ‘ ..f”fla j.w: ( ) 2(1 - ‘ ‘ .i’rl fli ‘97 31; C liSts i. inecjlnre ‘ LIV iJit I Tifl at intere4 it 6°o p a. as igam th 1mm of I s 1. 00 000 on ac ount of he rqune ustainecl by I ppel C ‘iffi 2 IC ‘C quantum of compensation a arded In the Tribunal is rnadtquate the present appeal is filed sceking enhancement The brief fact of he at ir r 16 2 200€ at ibc it 1) 30 midnight the ppe-llanl u q .sqndinu in the ide ad Aaiting for iuto i I sh’nii b near it ghp t nkip 3aglr 4 It e I r i 1 It I qr IL 4 II’ stL P’’ .U1—)iY!’U’’ L ‘Utt(1U -P1 1 ?itfl.lu,ccJ11’Z •j4Ihj:fl). . 3 pt.jj ‘LIL iii: T-’%’tfl ‘-.t’ L’’-’I laLit )çj t UO V’ Lilt!’) Sr ‘hi uaiu rnflL tie IsauctcIpqTTl. )atP kTOJWO nap tJL!fl—)UtI’ 4’, ‘t%Oi 4tU0.)Tl arnrnj jo s’o c.)TLILP4J zueptiaun pin pooj ZIUIL!STIU0U 3JLIBAJAUO’ spsflo UOLWSU )dUTO) aquosrai pit? 4%tLI $tTTpsunu juu in jiati rtiiqi. np 1134 p3441 sqfls si q iuciiadde aqj .i )J suuo pauieai uojjesuaduioa jo iuauaauequa &ipjaas ieadde spp pajjj ‘eq mujiaddu .tp auius )tfl lflL NTJSTW’9P thiag 4sudals jo atep d41 TL!1 uoppad jo awp aqi wag tu’d o 4% UI ita C. TSSUJ 1% 1’ U41 flU ned ut uouuad LUIL’f aq P)flOILB jeunquj 414 J( DI uo flPPu aip nipapjsuoa tagu utxuquj aqi a iojaq t 5 oral and documentary evidence and Interference by this Court is not called for. 5. After hearing the learned counsel on both sides and on careful perusal of the Impugned judgment and award, the only point for consideration is, Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal Is just and reasonable”?. 6. The occurrence of accident and the injuries sustained by the appellant In the accident are not In dispute. The Tribunal has rightly awarded Rs.1,82,750/- towards medical expenses and Interference by this Court is not called for. However, the Tribunal erred In not awarding just and reasonable compensation towards pain and suffering, conveyance, nourishing food and attendant charges, loss of income during treatment period. loss of amenities. discomfort, unhappiness and future loss of income. 4 / ——-a 6 7. The appellant has sustained fractures of both bones of right lower legs. left wrist, nasal bone and commuted and depressed fracture of right partal region (Skull). The doctor assessed disability of 45% to right limb, 25% loss of memory and whole body disability at 40%. The appellant has taken treatment for 18 months and undergone two surgeries. As per the advise of the doctor he might have taken bed rest for three months. Discomfort, unhappiness and disability persists through-out his life. As per the Pay Slip Ex.P-8, the appellant was drawing a salary of Rs. 19393/- per month. Taking into consideration the nature of Injuries sustained, period of treatment undergone, the avocation and the salary, we award a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- towards pain and suffering, Rs.20,00QL towards conveyance, nourishing food and attendant charges, Rs.58, 179/- (Rs.19,393/- x 3 months) towards loss of income during treatment period, Rs.60,000/- 7 Pain & Suffering Rs. 1,00,000/- Medical expenses Rs. 1,82,750/- Conveyance, nourishment & Attendant charges Rs. 20,000/- Loss of income during treatment Rs. 58,179/- Loss of amenities, disability, dis comfort and unhappiness Rs. 60,000/- Future medical expenses I Rs. 15,000/- iomi 4 [ Rs. 4,35,929/- Thus. in all, the appellant is entitled to Rs. 4,35,929/- as against Rs.3, 14,750 I- awarded by the Thbunal. The enhanced compensation comes to Rs. 1,21,179/- wIth interest at 6% p.a. 8. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal Is allowed In part. The Impugned judgment dated 16-1-2007 passed In MVC 1923/2006 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-V, Court of Small Causes, Bangalore 1• towards loss of amenfties, discomfort, disabifity and unhappiness and Rs. 15,000/- towards future medical expenses. Thus, the total compensation awarded is as follows: - (1W Is hereby modified w at dmg compensation of lAs. 1.21.119/ with lnteie,t at a’ ‘ p.mlrorn tile dale of Petition till thy dale ut depnit. in addition to the rompensation awarded by the Tribunal. 9. The first respondent Instuare company is diretcd to deposit the enhanced compensation amount with iniere%t within three weeks from the date of receipt ot ropv of this judgment ai’d award. Die amount qhafl be released to the appellant soc n iftet the depo%ft. O1IIettodrlwA%2a Cr fl S. 1%