IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6005 of 2010 1. Maheshwari Devi W/O Lakshman Thakur R/O Vill.- Bishanpur, P.O. Samaila Lalganj, P.S. Keoti, Distt.- Darbhanga Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary Bihar, Patna 2. Palat Yadav S/O Laldhari Yadav R/O Vill.- Bishanpur, P.O. Samaila Lalganj, P.S. Keoti, Distt.- Darbhanga 3. Bindeshwer Yadav S/O Late Kallo Yadav And Septagone Late Hiya Lal Yadav R/O Vill.- Sarojapur, P.O. Samaila Lalganj, P.S. Keoti, Distt.- Darbhanga 4. Ram Lal Yadav S/O Late Kallo Yadav And Septagone Late Hiya Lal Yadav R/O Vill.- Sarojapur, P.O. Samaila Lalganj, P.S. Keoti, Distt.- Darbhanga 5. Chandeshwer Yadav S/O Late Kallo Yadav And Septagone Late Hiya Lal Yadav R/O Vill.- Sarojapur, P.O. Samaila Lalganj, P.S. Keoti, Distt.- Darbhanga 6. Uttimlal Yadav S/O Late Kallo Yadav And Septagone Late Hiya Lal Yadav R/O Vill.- Sarojapur, P.O. Samaila Lalganj, P.S. Keoti, Distt.- Darbhanga 7. Kallar Yadav @ Kallo Yadav S/O Late Jhokhan Yadav R/O Vill.- Bishanpur, Samaila Lalganj, P.S. Keoti, Distt.- Darbhanga ---------------------------------- 2. 06.9.2011. Heard Mr. Amrendra Narayan learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. The writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 30.1.2010 passed by Munsif, Ist, Darbhanga in T.S.No.7 of 2003, whereby the application filed by the plaintiff petitioner on 20.11.2009 for recall of the order dated 19.11.2009 has been rejected. 2 It so appears that the petitioner had filed an application dated 19.7.2009 for calling for the volume of the registered sale deed dated 19.8.2000 from the Sub Registry Office together with the voter list of 1995 relatable to Panchayat Lahwar and for marking the same as exhibits. The learned Munsif, I, Darbhanga vide order passed on 19.11.2009 has rejected the prayer of the petitioner, inter alia, on grounds that the original sale deeds were already on record of the proceedings and the documents proposed to be exhibited are not relatable to the suit and that the plaintiff was trying to delay the proceedings. The order dated 19.11.2009 rejecting his prayer was never questioned before this court rather the petitioner by filing the application dated 20.11.2009, had prayed for recall of the order passed on 19.11.2009 and which has since been rejected by the impugned order passed on 30.1.2010. I find no infirmity in the order passed by the learned Munsif, I, Darbhanga. The writ petition is dismissed. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)