IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM THURSDAY, THE 25TH AUGUST 2011 / 3RD BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 24436 of 2009(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. AVIVA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY INDIA LIMITED, 41/419, 4TH FLOOR, CHICAGO PLAZA, RAJAJI ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 035. REPRESENTED BY ITS ZONAL MANAGER MR.MANOJ GOVINDANKUTTY. 2. MR.MANOJ GOVINDANKUTTY, AVIVA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY INDIA LIMITED, 41/419, 4TH FLOOR, CHICAGO PLAZA, RAJAJI ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 035. BY ADV. SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR SRI.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS SRI.ANIL D. NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. NEW GENERATION BANKS & INSURANCE STAFF ASSOCIATION (AITUC), NEAR PADMA THEATRE, FLOWER JUNCTION, PUTHENCHAL ALI MUHAMMED BUILDINGS JEWS STREET, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 035. 2. C.S.VINOD, SECRETARY, NEW GENERATION BANKS & INSURANCE STAFF ASSOCIATION (AITUC), NEAR PADMA THEATRE, FLOWER JUNCTION, PUTHENCHAL ALI MUHAMMED BUILDINGS, JEWS STREET, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 035. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOCHI CITY. 4. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CENTRAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-31. THE WORD " STAFF ASSOCIATION" IS CORRECTED AS " EMPLOYEES UNION) ADDL.R5. THE DIRECOR GENERAL OF POLICE ( LAW & ORDER) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. (R5 IS IMPLEADED VIDE ORDER DATD 29/10/2009 AS PER I.A. 13476/2009) ADV. SRI.K.R.VINOD FOR R2 SMT.M.S.LETHA FOR R2 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPIN DAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No. 24436 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 25th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested that the interim order dated 29/10/2011 issued by this court be continued and the writ petition be disposed of. The learned counsel for the party respondents submitted that at the moment there is no problem in the premises of the petitioner and that rendition of police protection will be unnecessary. 2. Taking into account the rival submissions, we dispose of this writ petition directing the police officers (respondents 3 to 5) to render necessary protection to the petitioners for the smooth conduct of business by the petitioners in case they are approached by the petitioners in future for such protection. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE. dpk