IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.709 of 2011 BHOLA THAKUR @ KARIA SON OF RAJENDRA THAKUR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 18.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with K. Hat (Madhubani) P.S. Case No. 489 of 2009 pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnia registered under Sections 411 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In a theft case, on recovery of a stolen motorcycle, the F.I.R. was lodged against two other accused persons. The name of the petitioner sprang up during the investigation. Learned Sessions Judge order reflects that the petitioner is a member of the motorcycle theft gang and involved in several other cases. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was implicated in a theft case filed with regard to the theft of petitioner’s motorcycle, in which petitioner was made accused, but 2 subsequently, alleged motorcycle was released in his favour. Neither the F.I.R. nor the learned Sessions Judge order reflects the specific complicity of the petitioner in the present case. Since the petitioner was in custody earlier, this court is not inclined to give the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, but from the accusation levelled against the petitioner, it appears to be a fit case for grant of regular bail. Let the learned court below pass an appropriate order with regard to the regular bail of the petitioner on verification of the criminal antecedent of the petitioner. With the above observation, this application is, accordingly, disposed off. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)