In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-5917 of 2009 Decided on:- 30.03.2009 Vikas and others .....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana .....Respondent Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. C. Puri Present Mr. K. S. Dhaliwal, Advocate Ashok Kumar Jindal, AAG, Haryana. K. C. Puri,J (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the application for bail of Vikas, Sandeep @ Midha and Navin moved under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure So, bail application qua Vikas, Sandeep @ Midha and Navin stands dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage. So far as the other accused i.e Amit @ Mitta son of Hawa Singh and Sukhbir son of Sultan are concerned, their names does not figure in the FIR. According to the learned State counsel, their names cropped up from the statement of the accused and recovery of motor cycle is stated to have been taken place from Amit. However, learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Ved Parkash has stated at bar that names of Amit and Sukhbir do not figure in the statements under Section 161 Cr. P. C of any prosecution witness. So, without commenting on the merits of the case, so far as case of Amit @ Mitta son of Hawa Singh and Sukhbir son of Sultan are concerned, they are allowed concession of bail. Bail to the satisfaction of trial Court. March 30, 2009 ( K. C. Puri ) mamta Judge