IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.V.SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No: 10237 of 2001 BETWEEN: V. Ram Reddy S/o Late V. Rajreddy, Pothangal Village, Navipet Mandal, Nizamabad Dist. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Land Reforms Tribunal & Revenue Divisional Officer (Authorised Officer), Nizamabad. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Navipet Mandal, Nizamabad Dist. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents herein not to take any coercive steps including dispossession of the petitioner and his brothers from the lands mentioned in the notice dt 24-4-2001 in C.C.No.1401/NZB/75 issued by theR1 pending disposal of the petition ﬁled U/Rule 16(5) (b) of A.P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agril Holdings) Act, 1973 by duly declaring the proceeding initiated by R1 i.e., issuing of impunged notice dt 24-4-2001 selection certain lands of the petitioner and his brothers without disposing the above petition ﬁled by the petitioners and his brothers as illegal, arbitrary & contrary to the principals of law & also contrary to the provisions of A.P. land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 and pass such other order or orders as this Court may deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.RAVI KIRAN RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri Y. Neela Kanta Reddy, learned counsel, representing Sri V. Ravi Kiran Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, represents that no cause of action survives in this writ petition. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ P.V. SANJAY KUMAR, J November 11, 2008 DSK