IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT.JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 919 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 25/09/2008 in WP NO : 22487 OF 2007 on the file of the High Court.) Between: The Management A.P. Dairy Development Cooperative Federation Ltd., Lalapet,Hyderabad, Rep. by its Managing Director. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 Syed Mohammed Pasha S/o. Syed Shahab Code 2667/1648 Rep. by its Authorised Representative Mr. Sudershan Singh C/o. Shelter , 3-4- 472, Barkatpura, Hyderabad. 2 The Chairman -Cum-Presiding Officer, Additional Industrial Tribunal- Cum-Additional Labour Court, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.M.DILIP RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following : HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI & HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 919 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) The present writ appeal is filed by the appellant against the order of the learned single Judge passed in W.V.M.P.No:365 of 2008 in W.P.M.P.No:29209 of 2007 in W.P.No:22487 of 2007 on 25.9.2008. The appellant is the wirt petitioner, which has filed the writ petition. While admitting the writ petition on 29.10.2007, interim suspension of the operation of the award was passed. Subsequently, W.V.M.P is moved by the respondent-workman. While entertaining the vacate stay petition, the learned single Judge has passed the following order: “In the facts and circumstances of the case, the interim order granted on 29.10.2007 is made absolute subject to the condition that the petitioner deposits half of the amount as awarded by the Labour Court within a period of six Weeks from today. On such deposit, the respondent-workman is permitted to withdraw the same without furnishing any security. In default, the interim order stands vacated automatically without further reference to the Court and the respondent-workman is entitled to work out his remedies as available under law.” At this stage, the present appeal is preferred by the writ petitioner. Heard and perused the material available on record. The order impugned herein, which is a conditional order, is not passed on any merits of the case. The imposition of condition in the order impugned, is purely on the exercise of discretion, which is just and reasonable. Therefore, we feel that it is not a fit case to entertain the writ appeal at this stage of the proceedings. Hence, this writ appeal is devoid of merits and thereby, the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. _____________________________ Justice T. MEENA KUMARI ____________________________ Justice SANJAY KUMAR Dated 21st July, 2009. Dvs/Gurc HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI & HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 919 of 2009 (Judgment of the Division Bench delivered by Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) Dated 21st July, 2009.