1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 76 OF 2010 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 133 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 76 OF 2010 Aglowmed Ltd. ...Plaintiff. Vs. Ajanta Pharma Ltd. ...Defendants. Mr. Mahesh A. Mahadgut for the Plaintiff. Mr. Rahul M. Kadam i/by Mr. H.W. Kane for the Defendants. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 17TH FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C.- 1 In a suit for infringement and passing off the trademark ARTIFEN, the parties have arrived at the settlement and accordingly signed the consent terms, dated 17th February, 2010. It is marked "X". It is counter signed by respective advocates also. The parties are present in the Court. There is no objection with regard to the signatures, authorization and identity of the person/party. The statement is made that the consent terms are well within the framework of law and the record and no third persons/parties will be affected by this consent terms. The undertaking as referred in paragraph Nos. 4,7 and 9 are accepted. 2 2 Resultantly, the suit is disposed of in view of this consent terms. 3 The refund of Court fees, if any, in accordance with law. 4 In view of above, nothing survives in the Notice of Motion and the same is also disposed of. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)