IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.736 of 2011 MUKESH KUMAR, S/O LATE RAVINDRA NATH SHARMA, R/O VILLAGE-SHASTRI NAGAR, P.O.-MUNGER, P.S.- KASIM BAZAR, DISTRICT-MUNGER. …………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUNGER. 3. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, MUNGER. 4. THE PROGRAMME OFFICER, BARIYARPUR BLOCK, MUNGER. 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BARIYARPUR BLOCK, MUNGER. 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, TATEYA BUMPER BLOCK MUNGER. ……………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 22.02.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly submitted that since the proceeding is pending against the petitioner the writ application may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to conclude the proceeding within a fixed time. Learned counsel for the respondents does not object to the said prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of with a direction to the respondents to conclude the proceeding pending against the petitioner positively within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in compliance with the Principles of Natural Justice. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)