AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.100 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.998 OF 2005 Smt. Leelabai Vitthalrao Bhegde. .... Petitioner Vs. Union of India & Ors. ..... Respondents Mr. J.M. Tanpure with Mr. A.P. Vanarse for the petitioner. Mr. Jagdish G. Reddy with Ms. Lata Patne for Union of India. Mr. S.S. Pakale, appeared as amicus curiae. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & SMT. R. S. DALVI, JJ. DATED : 27TH JANUARY, 2009. P.C. :- Review is sought of our judgment and order dated 21/2/2008. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will obtain succession certificate or heirship certificate in support of her claim that she is the wife of deceased Vitthal Kaluji Bhegade. He submitted that in the interest of justice, therefore, this court may permit the petitioner to obtain succession certificate or heirship AJN 2 certificate. He submitted that the order dated 21/2/2008 needs to be reviewed for this reason. We are not inclined to review our order. The impugned judgment and order is passed after considering all submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner. No substantive evidence was submitted either before the Central Administrative Tribunal or in the High Court in support of the petitioner's case. Even today, learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to produce any substantive evidence in support of the contention that the petitioner is the wife of deceased Vitthal Kaluji Bhegade. In our opinion, the present case is not covered by any of the conditions stipulated in Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. No case is made out for review. Review Petition is dismissed. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [SMT. R.S. DALVI, J.]