fy" HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition fSV No. 418 of 2008 Petitioner Raj Kumar Nagesh, Age about 46 year, U.D. Teacher. S/o Shri Sadhram Nagesl?, R/o VHIage & Post - Pawnj, Bhiiai^arh, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. ^State Govt. of Chhaffisgarh. Through the Secretary, School Education Department, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur 2. Distt. Education offlcer, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) WRST PETITOIN UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTltUTlbNOF INDIA Sjngle Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri B. K. Chakrabarfy, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 22nd day ofJanuary, 2008) The petitioner js aggrieved by the nature of the order. According to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. it js not dear asto vyhich order is appficabte to the petitioner. For such things, this Court does not have wherewitha! to dedde the question of facts. Even otherwise, there is no semblance of breach of any legal. fundamental or statutory right in the pteadings, as wei< as inthe submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the petltioner. if the petitioner is confused about the transfer orders dated 21.9.2007, he is at tiberty to approach the concemed authority for clarification of the order. There is no merit in the case. Even otherwise, this Court has timited jurisdiction to interfere in the transfer matter, except tn the case of proveci malafsds, non-competence of 3. authority passing the transfer order and transfer orcter not being jn conformity with the ruies and regulations. In view of the foregoing, this petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner js at liberty to approach the concerned authority, raising his grievance, if any, which may be considered and decided in accorctance with law by the competent authority. — Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Thakur