HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Special Appeal No. 91/2009 Archit Prasar. ……….Appellant Versus State of Uttarakhand and three others. …….Respondents Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. J.P. Joshi, Chief Standing Counsel for the State/respondent nos. 1,3 & 4. Mr. Manoj Sah, holding brief of Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Advocate for respondent no.2. Coram: Hon’ble V.K.Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. V.K. Gupta,C.J. (Oral) After hearing learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents and upon perusal of the impugned judgment as well as the report of the Committee constituted vide Court order dated 16th February 2009, we are convinced that the learned Single Judge did not err in refusing to grant any interim relief to the appellant, because the Committee has conclusively established and come to the conclusion that the domicile certificate obtained by the petitioner/appellant was forged and fake one. 2. No interference is called for. 3. The appeal is dismissed in limine. (V.K. Bist, J.) (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 05.05.2009 NCM: