HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE No.884 of 2009 in W.P.M.P. No.3443 of 2009 in WRIT PETITION No.26379 of 2008 Date: June 27, 2011 Between: M/s. Venkateswara Fish Hatchery, Rep. by its proprietor Gandham Venkata Swamy Naidu. … Petitioner And 1. Dr. K. Janaki Ram, Director, Central Institute of Fresh Water Aquaculture, Bhubaneshwar, Orissa & 5 others. … Respondents * * * HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE No.884 of 2009 in W.P.M.P. No.3443 of 2009 in WRIT PETITION No.26379 of 2008 O R D E R: This contempt case alleges disobedience to the order dated 22.4.2009 passed by this Court in W.P.M.P. No.3443 of 2009 in W.P. No.26379 of 2008. By the said order, this Court directed the Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture, Bhubaneswar, Orissa, to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 17.12.2008 pending disposal of the writ petition. The said representation was made by the petitioner seeking appointment as a Marketing Agent for Jayanthi Rohu fish seed. 2. It is now stated by Smt. C. Vani Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, that the Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture, Bhubaneswar, Orissa, complied with the interim order passed by this Court referred to supra. A copy of the communication dated 09.8.2010 addressed by the Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture to the petitioner is produced. Perusal thereof reflects that in compliance with this Court’s order, the Institute addressed letter dated 11.12.2009 to the petitioner communicating its willingness to select the petitioner as a ‘multiplier unit’ subject to fulfilment of requisite formalities, one of which was that he should undergo necessary training. However, as the petitioner failed to come forward to undergo the required training and on the other hand, nominated a third party, the Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture informed the petitioner that his request could not be acceded to. 3. In the light of the aforestated developments recorded in the communication dated 09.8.2010 addressed by the Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture, Bhubaneswar, to the petitioner, it is clear that there is no disobedience, much less wilful or deliberate, to the interim order dated 22.4.2009 passed by this Court in W.P.M.P. No.3443 of 2009 in W.P. No.26379 of 2008. 4. The contempt case is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J Date: June 27, 2011. BSB