1 Cri.A.2176.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2176 OF 2011 [ Vishnu Tukaram Pandule and another Vs. The State of Mah. and another ] Mr.V.D.Salunke , Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. D.V.Tele, A.P.P. for the respondent/State Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. DATED : 25TH MAY, 2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. This is an application for anticipatory bail. The applicants are being charged for the offence punishable under sections 306, 342, 348, 330 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3(i) (vi), 3 (2) (v) (vi) and 6 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes( Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The charge-sheet is already filed, even the learned Sessions Judge has 2 Cri.A.2176.11 observed that the custodial interrogation of the applicants is not necessary, their detention is not necessary, but only on the ground that there is no apprehension has rejected the application. 3. In the light of above, the application is allowed, in the event of their arrest, the applicants are released on bail, on furnishing P.R. bond of Rs. 15,000/-(Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each and one surety of like amount each. The applicants will not leave the local Municipal limits of the area of residence without prior intimation to the Police. 4. The application is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- [ S.V.GA NGAPURWALA ] VACATION JUDGE MTK/