IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.7609 of 2005 Between: 1 Rahul's Medical and Health Services Society, Kothakota-509 381, Mahabubnagar District rep by President Dr. P.S. Reddy 2 Health Education Agriculture Development Society Post: Muttala, mandal: Atmakur Anantapur District rep by President Dr. M. Prabhakar Reddy ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Government of India Ministry of Health & Family Welfare Department of Family Welfare, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi, rep by Secrtary 2 M/s. Hindustan Latex Family Planning Promotion Trust, Latex Bhavan, Mahilamandiram Raod Poojappura, P.O. Trivandrum Kerala, rep by Managing Trustee .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in selecting the 2nd respondent as Regional Resource Centre for the State of Andhra Pradesh, as arbitrary, discriminatory, illegal and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and for a consequential direction to set a side the selection and to direct the 1st respondent to carryout inspection of the petitioner's organization and to consider their cases for selection as Regional Resource Centres for Group-I States (States of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka) and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.K.BATHI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.7609 of 2005 ORDER: When the matter has been taken up for hearing on 11-03-2008, none appeared for the petitioners and as such, the matter has been posted “for dismissal” today. Today also, neither learned counsel for the petitioners is present nor is there any representation on their behalf. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 13-03-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRT}