IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No.213 of 2011 IN CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 14191 of 2009 ==================================================== 1. Sarvesh Kumar, son of Shri Devendra Prasad, resident At and P.O.- Chausa, District-Buxar. 2. Santosh Kumar, son of Shri Kailash Prasad, resident At and P.O.- Dumraon, District-Buxar. 3. Ajit Kumar, son of Shri Nathuni Prasad, resident At and P.O.-Saray Fatak, District-Buxar. All are peresently posted as Assistant Teachers in Government Basic School, Sarenja, P.S.-Raipur, District-Buxar. …. …. Petitioners - Appellants Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna Division, Patna. 4. The District Education Officer, Buxar. 5. The Sub-Divisional Education Officer, Buxar. 6. The Area Education Officer, Buxar. 7. The Incharge Headmaster, Government Basic School, Sarenja, Rajpur, Buxar. …. …. Respondents - Respondents ==================================================== Appearance : For the Appellants : Mr. Rana Ishwar Chandra, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Giri, A.C. to AAG-6 ==================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2. 3.2.2011. Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 20th December 2010 made by the learned single Judge in above C.W.J.C. No. 14191 of 2009 the writ petitioners have preferred the present appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. The appellants claimed that by order dated - 2 - 30th December 2004 made by the District Education Officer they were appointed as Assistant Teachers in Government Basic Schools. Pursuant to the said appointment they joined the Basic School at Sarenja, District-Buxar on 11th January 2005. Nevertheless, they have not been paid salary till the date. The petition was contested by the State Government. The State Government disputed the veracity of the documents relied upon by the appellants. According to the State Government the appointment order dated 30th December 2004 was a forged document. The appellants were never appointed as Assistant Teachers as claimed by them. In view of the disputed facts the learned single Judge has dismissed the writ petition. Therefore, the present appeal. We have extensively heard the learned advocates. No case for interference is made out. The appeal is dismissed in limine. Pawan/- (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Jyoti Saran, J)