PETITION ER 6D IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH w.P. No. A} $93 /2004 XF‘rashant Kumar Shukia, aged about 3O years, S/o. Shri Kailash Prasad Shukla, Presentiy working as Steno to Superintendent of Police, South Bastar, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh, Permanent: R/o. Ward No.16 Sagar—Pesa, House No.65, Chhindwara, District Chhindwara, Madhya Pradesh VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 3’s.» State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh Department of Home Affairs, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Union of India, Through: The Secretary, Department of Personnei Training, Public Grievances and Administrative Reforms, 3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi State of Madhya Pradesh, Through: The Secretary Government of M.P. Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh The Director General of Police, Government of Chhattisgarh,- Police Head Quarter Raipur, Chhattisgarh The Director General of Police, Government of " Madhya Pradesh, Police Head Quarter, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh W v C9 The State Advisory Committee, Through: Its Chairman, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh e WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITION OF INDIA / XI—HC-22 mammtw WW§WW $a§nm 11-4-2005 On a mentionbeing made, the cas'e‘ is taken up for hearing. Mr. Sanjay Ku. Agrawal, co nsel for the petitioner. and 4. Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Govt Advocate for the sate/respondents No.1 Mr. R.S. Baghel, Addition i Central Govt. Standing Counsel for the Union of indie/respondent No.2. Heard. The caseof the petitioner s that before reorganisation of the State of Madhya Pradesh and coming int existenoe of the State of Chhattisgarh‘the petitioner was appointed as Sten grapher in the Office of Superintendent of Police, Dantewada. Thereafter, ter reorganisation of the State with effect from 1-11-2000, the petitioner ng a resident of the State of Madhya Pradesh opted for allocation of hi service to the State of Madhya Pradesh. but the same has not been consid red. Therefore, learned counsei for the petitioner submits that the petitioner led representation to respondent No.2 d may be allowed to make a through respondents No1 8r 3 to which learned counsel appearing for respondents No 1 4 a 2 have no biection Havmg heard teamed cou sel for the parties and havrng regard to the facts and Circumstances of the aee, the petitioner is allowed to make a detailed representation to respo dent No.2 through respondents No.1 & 3 withinrn~15 days from today‘ a d on receipt of the representation by respondents No.1 & 3. the sa e shall be forwarded by them with their comments to respondent~N02 n three months from the date of receipt of the representation from the petiti ner, in turn, respondent No.2 shaii decide f i i i w' WWW k z ~ WWW $WW§¥T the same within a period of anather six months thereof. in accordance with iaw. With the direction aforesaidi, the petition siands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P.No,4993/2004 and l.A.No.9344i2004 also ’ stand disposed of. Parties are entitled for certiied copy of this order. sol- LuaeHADOQ Judge (noW) W#