IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37816 of 2008 MD.SOHEL @ MD.SOHAIL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 7.1.2009 Heard Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, Learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. Regard being had to the fact that the theft article, the motor- cycle, was recovered from the possession of the petitioner, the Court is not act upon the contention that there is a bit of variance between the Chassis number as appearing in the F.I.R. or as found embossed on the vehicle. In the light of the contention of the Additional Public Prosecutor that the vehicle has been duly made over to the informant after proper security and identification, this petition is dismissed. However, as soon as the petitioner completes one and a half year in confinement in connection with Araria P.S. case no.180 of 2005 and if the trial is not concluded by that period, the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail by the court below itself on execution of bond to its own satisfaction. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )