("/^'/'OOJ^- IN THEHIGH^QURT OF JUDICATUREAT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION (Sl N0. ^ 72006 "Se'..^ 1 PETITIONER .....^^l^ ^^^§^^ 1^ &W! "'v^ pies1-'" ....•<'-"" Aat84-"" RESPONDENTS 1. Ram Roop Sahu, S/0. Shri Kishan Sahu, aged about - 63 years. (Retired Eniployee) R/o : Village : Kailashpur, Post: Deo Nagar, Police Station : Ramanujnagar, Tehsil : Surajpur, Distt. : Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, F'ublic Health and Family Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) ,^f!^^ ^'^^ ^'.1,>',WA '-.^ O -" .lUV'. " ^•,CG^)';OK.. ^^€t/ *<^'.: 'VK^:y c^6^<0 ff ><p^v» 2. The Director, Health Services Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Chief Medical 8s Health Officer, ' Ambikapur, Surguja, Distt. : Surguja (C.G.) 4. The Collector, Surguja, Distt. : Surguja (C.G.) ./- 5. The Senior Account Officer, Through : Offlce of Accountant General Raipur (C.G.) 6. TheJoint Director, Treasure and Account Bilaspur Distt. Bilaspur. (C.G.) 7. The District Treasurar Officer, Ambikapur, Surguja, Distt: Surguja (C.G.) •8. The Block Medical Officer, Ramanujnagar, Tehsil : Surajpur Distt. : Surguja (C.G.) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/22'LQF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SS ^Q XI-HC-78 ^1<4^1 ShHI<ft 3:5T •<<l<ll<fl'l|, ®Tn<H'IS,(qi-IKHy ^-.y.^.^0^ W[ 200^ 3ii^i 4;ict> (yl^^) sn^rqirfeN; (raTSIT^Tsniiqi 5T3TW (rfsa'sn^r *l'i|fl'l41-1 HWV}\ if fel^t <Rl<rc;l<, ^iSlf^ITSn^T flovt ttiie 30-8-2006 Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Pate| Mr. Satish Supta, Deputy l^o advance cocy. Heord bo-rii the counsel. Main grievance raised by Article 226/227 of the from service on 31 Mar'ch, 2004| Departnient, but his retiral dues being fixed by the respondent Learned counsel for •the pension is also not being paid to P-3. In the circumstonces, leamfei No.2 be directed to decide the p^i and all the dues be paid to the p4l for the State/respondents has ro The petitioner retired as months back and on account of authorities, the petitioner, who decided for" one reason or the being paid to the petitioner. Hoi^ paid since last 2 |- years can authorities must take into accourrt petitioner. Therefore, responden^ , counsel for the petitioner. avt. Advocate for the State/respondents, on the petitioner in this writ petition under Constitut'ion of India is that the petitioner retired from the post Surveillance Worker, Heal'th |»'enot being pafd, as also his pensmn is rot auttiorities. [^etitioner submits that even the provisional petitioner which isevident from Aroiexure ifed counsel further submits that respondent snsion case of the petitioner at the earliest i4titioner, to which learned coimsel appeorin9 ^ibjection. as on 3l't Morch, 2004 about 2 years 5 jnsensitwity on the papt of the respondent a low paid employee, his case is not being '. Even the provisional pension is also not a retired employee to whom pension is not survive urithout pension. The respondent all these points and decide the case of the No.2 shall decide the pension case of the P.T.O. t»0s otlber XI-HC-78 3V^ qiT R-ti'ti TOT sn^T sb*iicti Soma '^ ^J>i tTTOC'TT gi^T^i 3^''<<Wlfl<l, 9^1w'l<B, Rtcll+iy —..^•p.l.^-.'<^/ T:TT9? "" """"""""7"'W[ 200^ sn^rq^; (^qfgg^T) 5CTW fl1?(T 3'n^T ^' date petitioner within a period of two this order cnd ensure that ail period of one month from the No.6, the Joint Oirector, Treasi^ry ensure that the pension ccse o-^ expeditiously and the same is d^ci period of two months from the da^ With the directjons aforeslaid Parties cre entitled ^nonths from the date of receipt of a copy of p^yments are made to the petitioner within a of decision of the pension. Respondent & Accounts, Bilospur, is also directed to the petitioner is examined and processed dc|cided in accordcnce with the rules, within a da|'e of receipt of a copy of this order. afore^aid; the petition stands disposed of. for ceiftified copy of this order. *iit<-i<fl-i iTOcff ff tec8' <RK?;I< ^isrf^gn^r o P.T.O.