[1] DBCWP(PAROLE) NO. 5253/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION (PAROLE) NO. 5253/2010 TAUKHIR @ TOFIK Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. DATE OF ORDER: 16.07.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENA V. GOMBER Mr. Lakhan Singh Tomar, Advocate for petitioner. Ms. Rekha Madnani, Public Prosecutor for State. **** Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has preferred this parole writ petition for grant of second parole of 30 days. His case was considered by the District Parole Advisory Committee in its meeting dated 23.03.2010 and case of petitioner was rejected on the ground that report from the Police Superintendent, Muradabad (U.P.) has not been received. Since report of Superintendent of Police was not available before the District Parole Advisory Committee, therefore, the matter was not considered on merits. Therefore, we think it fit and proper to quash the order dated 23.03.2010 passed by the District Magistrate, Jaipur qua petitioner and remand the matter to the District Collector and District Magistrate, Jaipur/District Parole Advisory Committee, [2] DBCWP(PAROLE) NO. 5253/2010 Jaipur to reconsider the matter of petitioner for grant of second parole as per the provisions of the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958. The District Magistrate, Jaipur is directed to make a positive effort and will see that report from Superintendent of Police, Muradabad (U.P.) is received at an early date and on receipt of the same, will place the matter for reconsideration before District Parole Advisory Committee. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. A copy of this order may be sent to the District Magistrate, Jaipur for compliance. (MEENA V. GOMBER),J. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. /KKC/