IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.650 of 2010 Amrendra Upadhyay, son of Sri Rajendra Upadhyay, resident of village NISIZA, P.S. Karm Chatt (Sadar) District Kaimur…………………………………………………………………….Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna 3. Inspector General of Police (Head Quarter) Bihar, Patna 4. Deputy Inspector General of Police (Head Quarter), Bihar, Patna……………….………….Respondents ----------- 3 10.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. It is sheer bad luck of the petitioner that though he was having 13 points, he could not be appointed as other persons, who were having 13 points and appointed, were older in age. With their appointment, the entire vacancy of the general category got filled up and so no other candidate of general category could be appointed, even if they also had 13 points, in the process of appointment initiated pursuant to Advertisement no.02/2004. For recent appointments, petitioner has become over-age and, 2 therefore he could not apply and could not be considered though there was no fault on the part of the petitioner. But in the facts and circumstances, this Court is unable to grant any relief to the petitioner. The writ application is, accordingly, dismissed. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)