IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 12618 of 2008 Between: 1 Kamma Sapineni Pullama Naidu@ Pullaiah S/o.Venkatanaidu Paidipalem(V) Simhadripuram(M) Kadapa District 2 Kamma Sapineni Ashok Naidu S/o.Venkatanaidu Paidipalem(V) Simhadripuram(M) Kadapa District ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Special Deputy Collector G.N.S.S.Unit III Muddanuru Kadapa District 2 The Branch Manager Rayalaseema Grameena Bank Simhadripuram Kadapa Dist 3 Peddarosigalla Pakkerappa S/o.Ganaganna R/o.Paidipalem(V) Simhadripuram(M) Kadapa District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in paying the compensation to the 3rd respondent towards the 100 orange trees planted in Sy.No.302-1 of Paidipalem(V) simhadripuram(M) Kadapa District which was acquired for public purpose without considering the petitoner right over the orange trees or without refering the dispute to the civil court under Sec 30 of the Land Acquisition act 1894 as illegal arbitrary and in violation of the art 14 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to refer the dispute to the civil court for proper adjudication and to decide the rights of the parties over 100 orange tree planted in Sy.No.302-1 in an extent of ac 1.48 cents of Padipalem(V) Simhadripuram(M) Kadapa Dist in the interest of the justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.D.GOWD Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 12618 of 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners ﬁled a letter, dated 24.10.2008, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 30.10.2008 JSU ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{BMR} THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 12618 of 2008 Date: 30.10.2008 JSU