(S) -^ c /2. c^ Rj IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cl No. <^^ OF 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS •,3| •^ ^ Surya Chakra Global Enviro Power Limited (Formerly Lahiri Power & Steel Limited) Through Managing Director Sheshavatharam Manepalli, Aged about 34 years, S/o Dr. S.M.Manepalli, R/o Surya Chakra House, Plot No.304, L-lll, Road No.78, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 33 VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Energy, D. K. S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). 2. Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited through Chief Engineer (Commercial), Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. Chief Engineer (Commercial), " Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Raipur Chhattisgarh 4. Additional Chief Engineer (Commercial), Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Raipur Chhattisgarh 5. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory -" Commission, Irrigation Colony, Shanti Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh through Secretary WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERS OR THEUKE ^ COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR^ PETSTSON (C) N0. S639 OF 2010 Petjtjoner Surva Chakra Globsi Enviro Power Limlted (Formeriy Lahlri Povver & Steel Umited). Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITiON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTiON OF JNDiA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agoihotri, J.) :- Shri Ranbir Singh Marhas, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate forthe State. (ORALI (Passed on 30th day of September, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the order impugned dated 14.09.2010 (Annexure P-1) was passed, directing recovery of Rs. 80,04,084/-. Against that, the petitioner has already preferred an appiication/ietter dated 23.09.2010 (Annexure P-4) for ciarification regarding scheduiing of energy by Biomass piants as per order dated 15.01.2008, to the Chhattisgarh State Electricity Reguiatory Commission (for short "CSERC)T). The same is pending consideration. Today, being the last day, if no interim order Is granted, the Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Co. Ltd. (for short "CSPDCL") may proceed wlth the recovery of the amount. 2. Be that ss It may, it appears that pursuant to the order dated 15.01.2008, passed by the CSERC, the Impugned order was passed. The petitioner has immediately preferred an application / letter to the CSERC for darificatlon of the order. 3. in view of that, it would not be proper to entertain the petitjon at this stage when the applicatjon/ietter is already pending before the CSERC for consideration/modification of the earlier order. However, having regarding to the total facts, it is expected that the appiication/letter dated 23.9.2010 filed by the petltioner v^ouid be consldered and decided by the CSERC as expeditiousiy as posslble, preferabiy within a period of 4 weeks. 4. Accordingiy, the writ petition is dlsposed of. No order asto costs. ashok Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge