{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.833 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.67 OF 2010 Sanjay Baburao Joshi APPLICANT VERSUS Samarth Sahakari Patpedhi Maryadit Dhule & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. Vinay Solshe h/f Mr.M.H.Patil, Advocate for applicant Mr. N.R.Shaikh, APP for respondent No.2 State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 4th March 2010 PER COURT: 1. By this application the applicant has prayed to condone two day’s delay caused in preferring the revision application. Heard. Issue notice to respondent No.2 only. Learned APP accepts notice. 2. Heard. For the reasons stated in paragraphs No.3 to 5 of the application it appears that the delay is not intentional or deliberate and hence the delay needs to be condoned. In the {2} premise, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause “A” and “B” and stands disposed of. Registry to register the accompanying revision. Applicant to move / take circulation after registration of the criminal revision. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln833-10