IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 509 of 2008 (M/S) M/s Joshi Silayee Center, through its Proprietor Sri Prayag Dutt Joshi, S/O Sri Raghver Dutt, Resident of G.I.C. Chouk Champawat, District Champawat. …… Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand through District Magistrate Champawat and two others. … Respondents. Sri Yogesh Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri K.P.Upadhyay, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the respondents nos. 1 and 3. Sri D.S.Patni, learned counsel for the respondent no.2-Bank. Date April 28, 2008. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard Sri Yogesh Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri K.P.Upadhyay, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the State and Sri D.S.Patni, learned counsel for the respondent no.2-Bank and perused the record. It reveals from a perusal of the counter affidavit filed by the respondent no.2-Bank that the loan was granted to the petitioner under the State Sponsored financial scheme. The recovery certificate was issued against the petitioner as per Rules framed under the U.P. Public Money Recovery Act. The interim order dated 20-03-2008 is vacated. Considering the submissions made by the parties’ counsel and taking into consideration the circumstances of the case, the petitioner may make a representation for payment of outstanding dues in instalments before the Recovery Officer, i.e. Tahsildar Champawat-respondent no.3 and the respondent no.3 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within a 2 period of eight weeks from the date of production of certified copy of order along with the representation. Till the decision of the representation, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of finally. All pending applications stand disposed of. ( B.S.Verma, J. ) RCP 3 4 5