W.P.(Crl.) No. 544 of 2008 10.11.2017 None appears for the petitioner at the time of call. Mr. P.K. Muduli, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate states that he does not possess any reco rd. The petitioner has filed this application seeking direction to the opposite parties to investigate in Lalbag P.S. Case No.51 of 2008 corresponding to G.R. Case No.451 of 2008 pendi ng in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Cuttack Sadar. Mr. P.K. Muduli, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate contended that in view of the judgment o f the apex Court in Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P. and others, (2008) 39 OCR (SC) 287, since ade quate remedy is available in the Cr. P.C., instead of availing the same, the petitioner could not have approached this Court by filing the instant case. Considering the contention raised by learned counsel for the parties, this W.P.(Crl.) is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy under the statute in vie w of the law laid down by the apex court in Sakiri Vasu (supra). The W.P.(Crl.) is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. . (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE