IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 26838 of 2005 Between: 1 Peddireddi Kousalya W/o Late Janga Reddy R/o Nampally Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District 2 Peddireddi Sekhar Reddy S/o Late Janga Reddy R/o Nampally Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District 3 Peddireddi Kondal Reddy S/o Janga Reddy R/o Nampally Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District 2 The Sub-Division Police Officer, Devarakonda, Nalgonda District 3 The Station House Officer, Nampally, Nalgonda district 4 P. Sesha Reddy S/o Malla Reddy R/o Nampally Village & Mandla, Nalgonda District 5 Nageswara rao SI of Police, Thadwai P.S. Thadwai Vilalge, Nizamabad District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandmaus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in not investigating the Crime NO. 29 of 2003 of P.S. Nampally against the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 as illegal and contrary to Sec. 173(1) of Cr.P.C. and direct them to complete the investigation and filed charge sheet in Crime NO. 29 of 2003 of P.S. Nampally, Nalgonda and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KOYAPRABHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No : 26838 of 2005 O R D E R : Since there was no representation for the petitioners on 22-01-2009, the matter is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, none appeared for the petitioners. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J Dated: 23-01-2009 KLP