WP(C) 4038/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. A. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. M.R. Pathak, learned Standing counsel, Education Department. The petitioner who is the son of a retired teacher has filed this writ p etition praying for direction to the respondents to appoint him against the 10% quota earmarked for the sons and daughters of the retired teachers. The father o f the petitioner retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 30.04.2010. Needless to say that for appointment against the aforesaid quota, the petitione r will have to be a selected candidate which admittedly he is not. In fact, no selection process has been initiated. Merely because the petitioner is the son of a retied teacher, he cannot claim automatic appointment against the aforesaid quota. It will be open for him to participate in the selection process, if and when the same is conducted by the respondents.