Gua.P. 1/2005 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE T VAIPHEI AND THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B D AGARWAL Heard Mr U Bhuyan, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Ms K M Talukdar, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr N Deka (Brigadier), learned counsel fo r the respondent. The appellant No. 1 died during the pendency of this appeal. In the course of hearing last week, the learned counsel for the appellan t No. 2 had submitted that he did not want to press the appeal if he were given visiting rights in respect of the child. On the basis of this statement, the lea rned counsel for the respondent was given time to obtain instructions. The learn ed counsel for the respondent has informed this Court today that the respondent is ready to give visiting rights to the appellant No. 2 on the following terms a nd conditions: - i) The appellant No. 2, Sri Dilip Kumar Bora or any other member of the pa ternal family of the child, shall have the right to visit the child, once a mont h for (two) hours on a holiday/ Sunday, at her residence at Morigaon. ii) For family functions in her paternal home, the child will be permitted ( subject to her consent), to attend the same along with a member of the family of her Guardian, during the day; no night stay will however be permitted. On the basis of the aforesaid terms and conditions, this appeal, which d oes not survive for consideration, stands disposed of. The parties are directed to give their respective costs.