IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3657 of 2010 Between: Paida Chengalraya Chetty ..... PETITIONER AND Kolla Puspallam (died) and 2 others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3657 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner is the plaintiff who filed the suit O.S.27/99 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Nagari for declaration of title and for delivery of possession. It is not in dispute that the evidence on both sides was over and in fact, earlier an advocate-commissioner was appointed to note down the physical features in I.A.89/99 who inspected the suit property on 15.03.1999 and filed his report and plan. When the matter was coming up for arguments, the petitioner filed I.A.99/2010 in the said suit under Or.26 Rule-9 CPC for appointment of an advocate-commissioner for the purpose of revisiting the suit property and building of the defendant and to take the measurements of the suit property and the building of the defendant and file his report. The Court below dismissed the said application by the impugned order dated 23.06.2010 holding that the advocate-commissioner appointed earlier in I.A.89/1999 visited the suit schedule property after giving due notices to both the parties and filed his report long back on 15.03.1999 and the plaintiff did not file any objections to the said report and both the parties adduced their evidence and the suit is coming up for arguments since 27.10.1999. The petitioner/plaintiff has no reason to file the said I.A.99/2010 seeking appointment of the Advocate Commissioner for purpose of revisiting the suit property and building of the defendant and to take measurements thereof, as earlier he did not raise any objection for the report of the advocate commissioner dated 15.03.1999. The Court below rightly dismissed the said application. I do not see any infirmity legal or otherwise to interfere with the impugned order. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 20.08.2010 Dsr