§§$H CG§RZ§ {3F CEEIATE‘ESGARE A? E§LA§9UR W’Ri'i‘ EETiTlgN N0. 1{§{§9 9f29€§5 §EZ¥ETEGNER : Anwezr Aiam Siddiqui aged about 31 years, Sz’b Shir Abdm Wahab Siddiqui, R/o Village And Post Fania Tahsil Baikun‘uhpur Distt. Koria (CG) VERSES RES?GNEEN'ES : 1‘ South Eastern Coalfieids Ltci. Through {is Chaiz‘mm 2. Gaiaeral Managér, SECL, Baikunthgiar Ai‘ea, 'Bist‘i. cum Maiiagiiig Directm‘, Seegm Road, Bilaspur Koria. L)A . The Cogector sum Land Acquisition Officer, Dim. iQDi‘i’i: T “Au”; /n r‘ \ WRIT PETE'EON ENDLR ARHCLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUHON‘ OF RBIA Pz‘esezii: $3: Emz’bie Shri 82mm K. Agnikatri. 3. Shrii).N Shri Fravlaeiihas: Praéapa‘ri Aévscateefo; Advocat ior1§1 tigéiésp;;1ti‘xel;1;-S. nehtlomz @RAL OwER (Passed on 19$ day of Februaly, 2€}OS) earned cmmsel fer ihe petitioner Lubmits ihat the petitimer beiag son m iaw of Smt. P2110 Bai is emi‘ded :0 employment iu lieu 0f acquisition of her lands as yer clause 2 ($) of i§1e circular dated 25m Septembcn 1991 (Anaemre W1). Leamed oouiasel fuiwsr soomiis that Sxm. Pale Bai became iandlecs ace? hci‘ lands were acquired by the respondents, and thereafier she siarted iiving with the pe’cifioner. Thas, the peiit‘ioner being depeoéam of Smt. Fab Bai is emii1ed to employment undef the :ea‘oWsiozm of clause 2 {$1} of tee saif} eiecuiaf. Leamee counsel iimher submits that the comemion of the respondems thai the soo—io-iew does oo‘a fall wéihin foe ambit of e3igibie caudidate for appoinimem as the said begefat car: be givexq to the W§dowe<i moiheg wiéswe—é sistea; siSter, daughter arxd elder fairer. h rs iiireher su‘emii‘teé \ ihai Shivdhai‘i Singh son of Agar Sai and Shyi Biimk§3an Sing} 30:3 of Ramsharan, ware given appointment in lieu. of aaquisition of €116 1am} bearing Khasra No. 34 area 1.283 heaares 133w Kkagra N0. 17, 1‘28 heistares under the ownership of one Shri Sim Ram {Amexum W6) who iiappem to be fathaiuinéaw ofShiVdhari Siogh aiad DikakiT :1 Singh. 3. Leamsci cotmsei for the psiitioner E‘s; fur‘émr poimed out that hkewis'e, one othsr person mama}; Lakhzm Siagl , being the son—in-law of Mithaé i3} was also granted emphyment in lieu of aoquisiéioia of 19416 of Shri Miihai La}. J; son-in-1aws haw: beea gamed amploymen’i ir; Eeu of aoquisiiion of land of their fathar-iibiaws, $211 may not oe a gmund for gmn: of Learned counsei awea1€zzg for the resoondems subméiS iha: even if ‘xhs empioymom to the pati‘iiooer, as it is oehoys the sire-aim“. 5. Bo ihai as 5r; may. The empioyer being i116 Public Seator Undermking camo‘i aciopt pick 213d choose policy. The eeciaion shouk‘. be a‘easonahle 8.115. faia it is ime that the petitioner does not acquire em righ‘r in View of the fact fihat certaia apooim‘mems were made which were ‘iieiaors ”rho poiioy mad the oircuEar dared 25th Sepiem‘oer, 1991. However, the respoodents are direcre-d to examirze the case of ihe pe‘tiiiomr mid if me petitroner is founo dependant, the respondems may consider granting employmem io {he peti’iioner in iieu of acquisitior} of land of Smr. 132110 Bai in accordance with the policy and the reievant circular. 6. With these ooservatioris, the petition is aiiowed to the above extent. No order asto costs. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ami: “W w f' ”I ’ Wagen-a ,.