1 WP 672.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 672 OF 2011 Bapu S/o Rajaram Patil .... PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Oths. .... RESPONDENTS Mr. V.D.Hon, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.K.Kadam, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for State. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE : 14/02/2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner filed objection to nomination of respondent no. 5 in the election to constitute Board of Directors of respondent no. 4 – Bank. The grievance is that the Returning Officer, respondent no. 3 herein, refused to accept objection petition filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned Assistant Govt. Pleader submits that election results 2 WP 672.2011 are declared and the petition has become infructuous. The petitioner is entitled to resort to appropriate remedy. 4. It is true that for challenging the election of respondent no. 5, the petitioner has adequate remedy but in the facts of the case, we observe that the Collector, Dhule shall, to the limited extent, call report from respondent no. 3 in respect of the allegations made by the petitioner herein that in spite of petitioner’s filing objection to the nomination of respondent no. 5, respondent no. 3 – Bank refused to accept the same. 5. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. The disposal of Writ Petition shall not affect the remedies, in case, resorted to by the petitioner in respect of challenge raised to the election of respondent no. 5. The parties to the petition to act upon the ordinary copy of this order duly authenticated by the Court Shirastedar. [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] knp/WP 672.2011