-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO.3213 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO.3213 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO.3213 OF 2006 Shri Maruti Bali Dinde, .. Petitioner. Vs Shri Ganpati Ramchandra Kadam and ors. .. Respondents. Mr S.M.Sabrad, for the petitioner. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 21.08.2006 DATE : 21.08.2006 DATE : 21.08.2006 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner has impugned the order dated 6.3.2006, by which his prayer that the lease deed dated 17.9.1988 and the agreement dated 10.8.1969 should not be read in evidence, has been rejected. The learned Judge, while rejecting the application, in paragraph 12 of the order has made it clear that an admissibility of the aforesaid documents will be decided at the stage of final judgment. He has kept that issue open which the petitioner can raise at the stage of advancing final argument after the evidence is over. In view thereof, I find no reason to interfere with the impugned order. However, all contentions are kept open for the petitioner to raise at an appropriate stage/s. The writ petition is disposed of. -2- (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)