IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.4324 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.11.2010 Mangal and others ......Appellant(s) Versus Haryana State and another ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Vijay Singh Kajla, Advocate for the appellants. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral) This is plaintiffs' second appeal challenging the judgment and decrees of the Courts below whereby their suit for declaration to the effect that they are in possession of the suit land and defendant No.2 has no title, right or interest in the same and the revenue entries showing the possession of defendant No.2 are illegal and not binding upon them, was dismissed. The suit was contested by defendant No.1 submitting that the grandfather of the appellants was not in possession of the suit land at any point of time and it was further submitted that the possession of the land was delivered to defendant No.2 vide lease deed dated 21.5.1971 and since then defendant No.2 was in possession of the suit land. Both the Courts below on appreciation of evidence have recorded a finding of fact that defendant No.2 is in continuous possession of the suit land since the year 1971 and the appellants have failed to establish that they were in possession of the suit land. No material evidence on the record to controvert the aforesaid findings have been pointed out before this Court. In view of the aforesaid, I find no merit in this appeal. No substantial question of law arises. Dismissed. November 17, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE