M c9 a?/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Petitio1’16; Wk” ‘k «3Q? Versus Respondents 2 1 . 00 Sukhmaniya, W/o Late Biharilal Aged about 38 years, R/o Moharso Banketapara, Block— Odgi, Tehsil — Surajpur, Dist : Sarguja—(C.G.) W.P.(S)No. JOHA /2007 State of Chhattishgarh, Through The Secretary, Department of Women and Child Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector (Women and Child Development), Sarguja—(C.G.) The Project Officer, Women and Child Development, Odgi, Dist : Sarguja (C.G.) Phoolwa W/o Birju, Aged about 50 years, R/o Village—Moharso, Block—Odgi, Tehsil — Surajpur, Dist : Sarguja—(C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, ,rau CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION ETC. Particulars of the Petitioner. As per cause title. / a @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Wri'r Pe‘ti'rion (5) No. 1046 of 2007 Pe‘ri‘rioner Sukhmaniya Versus Respondems Sto‘te of Chhatfisgwh 6t o‘thers Singic Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Juyice Safish K. Agnihofri. Ms. Deepadi Pandey, Pane! Lawyer for fhe 51’a‘fe/respondanfs. ORDER (Passed on 23" Day cf February, 2007) The fallowing order of 1he Courf was passad by safish K. Agniho'l'ri, J. Learned counsel appearing for fhe petitioner- submifs That The appointmenf of the respondent No. 4 on 1‘he posf of Aanganbadi Worker is confrory 'ro the provisions of Aangonbodi 5cheme as the respondent No. 4 is eiected Surpanch of Village—Moharso, Block—Odgi, Tohsil—surqjpur, District- Sargtu'a and her family is not living beiow the poverty line. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner belongs to the family living below the poverty line and she is living in the same village and has also passed class 8’“ Examination. Be that as it may, without expreseing any opinion the respondent No. 2 is directed to look into all the allegations mode by the petitioner and pass appropriate order in accordance with Aangonbadi Scheme and law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/— Subhosh i Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Present: Mr. AN. Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. 9