lsG^e?^ys- Rri iSEi^il^ ^,-C' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH M.A.IC1 N0. alQ^ /2006 APPELLANTS CLAIMANTS f RESPONDENTS 1. Manbodh Sahu, S/0. Nandu Sahu, aged about: 50 years. G. Smt. Juga Bai, W/0. Shri Manbodh Sahu, aged about: 45 years, Both are R/0. : Village : Khorpa, Tehsil : Abhanpur, Distt: Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Janak Lal Pandey, S/0. Paras Ram Pandey, R/0. : Santoshi Nagar Raipur, Distt : Raipur (C.G.) (Driver of the offending Vehicle) ft. RajjakAli, S/0. MatlubhAli, R/0. Arrigation Colony, Rajatalab Raipur, Distt. : Raipur (C.G.) (Owner of the ofTending Vehicle) n '3. The New India Insurance Co. Ltd. G.E. Road Bhilai, Distt. Durg (C.G.) (Insurer of the offending Vehlcle) /^4. Ku. Kalindi Sahu, D/0. Manbodh Sahu, aged about - 18 years, Ku. Purnima Sahu, D/0. Manbodh Sahu, aged about -12 years, Respondent no. 4 to 5 are R/0. Village : Khorpa, Tehsil: Abhanpur, Distt : Raipur (C.G.) APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT. 1,-' FOR ENHENCEMENT OF AWARD DATED 24:8.2006 XI-HC-78 3^'^TPIRTq', BTflyis, [slcliy^ / fc HWWI Sh*lich ••'•'••^..•^^•''.".'.^p^200-^ Sii^i'i 4a<»»('ici(^ct<«]iT) 3n^T^rl?qR; craTsn^Tstiiiiti B^nwHfltTsn^r qiiifct'fl-f Hii<-it ffteA<Rit<i< ^tsri^rsn^r th AAr. Pushpendra Kumcr Patel, Hsord. This appsa! has bsen praferr^i dcted 24th August, 2006, CiQims Tr-ibuna), Dhamtar'i, in Ciaim ailowed the cldm to the extent of H The Tribunssi "eached to deceased iVsukesh Kumar Scshu wa| asssssed cs 2/3" and ths multiplier| hos been passsd considaring the de[ loss of consortium snd Rs.10,000/- Lsarned coijnse) for the op^ yeariy income of the deceased has elaimants have not been ab!e to deceased wss getting ssier'y of Rs.3, Having peyused tha evidsn^ aHard, we ars of the opinion that t!|i reasonable. Therefore, we ars of t| TribunQi, does not r'equire any mti^ counssi for the appsilants. •|ed by the appeiionts being aggrieved by the fcassed by the Addi+ionsl Motor Aecident [ass No.96/2005,whersby iecrned Tribunal ^s.1,80,000/-. is conciusion that the yearly ecrning of Rs.15,000/-. The dependency hss besri of 16 hss been opplied, thereby,the award ssndsRcy as Rs.1,60,000/-, Rs.10,000/- for •or expenses of Isst rites. Isllcnts hcs not been sbie to show hcw ths iteen sssesssd on the iower sids because the produce any evidence to shoMi' thet the ,OQO/- per month from the owner. :e ayQiiable on record snd the impuqned is awsrd psssed by ths Tr'ihyna! is just snd |ie consider'ed th.at the aword passed by the sr.ference, os there is no infirmity in the deb fl^ TIHiff ^- XI-HC-78 *fl*lcTTSh+1|ch 3ST "ill'idrt'M, OTny'IS, (slfliuy ^M...A..CC)..^^ 2006 sn^?r ^aqi ('i^I'i'5!^) an^rwf^iN? cfSTT 3TT^?T ^ifl ?^tIRff(rf?cT3I1^T aws"d. Accordin9ly, the eppeal i dismissed. Sd/- Acting Chief Justice <»ii<ifo<fl-<'•iii'-iTft'teIA<Ri'wi< ^ari^iTsn^T k lisble to be dismtssed ond i* is her'eby Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge 1