CONTC NO. 1333 of 2010 03. 31.07.2017 The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that by order dated 1.6.2010, this Court had directed the authorities to decide the represe ntation of the petitioners within a period of six weeks, if not already decided. Along with t he contempt petition, no copy of the representation has been filed nor has been asserted as to which opposite parties the same was addressed. 2. A memo has been filed annexing some postal receipts to show that some letter h as been posted to six authorities. However, it is not clear as to which of the authorities the representation was addressed. 3. Learned Addl. Government Advocate states that the representation is required t o be decided by the Tahasildar, Sadar, Chandi Chowk, Cuttack under the O.P.L.E. Act. 4. In view of the aforesaid facts, we dispose of this contempt petition with the direction that in case the petitioners file a fresh representation before the Tahasildar, Sada r, Chandi Chowk, Cuttack along with the certified copy of this order as well as a certified co py of the order dated 01.06.2010 passed in the writ petition, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two months from the date of filing such representation. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. ....... (VINEET SARAN ) CHIEF JUSTICE .... bks (K.R.MOHAPATRA) JUDGE -