IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 1ST JANUARY 2008 / 11TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 36141 of 2007(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ BABY SIVADASAN, W/O.SIVADASAN, PONOTH HOUSE, KODUNGALLOOR . BY ADV. SMT.VANAJA MADHAVAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. O.K.KOCHUVAVA NOW CHANGED NAME AS KRISHNADAS ALIAS KOCHUVAVA, OLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, WATERLAND ROAD, PALLURUTHY P.O., COCHIN. 2. DHANYA, D/O.KOCHUVAVA, OLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, WATERLAND ROAD, PALLURUTHY P.O., COCHIN. 3. SUB REGISTRAR, NARAKKAL. 4. TAHSILDAR, FORT KOCHI. 5. SANTHOSH GEORGE, BUSINESSMAN, S/O.LATE D.GEORGE, PANAKALODY, PANAKALODY, HOUSE, THENGOD KARA, P.O.THENGODE, KAKKANAD. 6. SURESH GEORGE, S/O.LATE GEORGE, PANAKALODY, -DO-, -DO-. 7. REKHA THOMAS, W/O.PAINUMOOTTIL SUDEER THOMAS JOHN, THOMBRAYIL HOUSE, CHELAK KARA, KOTHAMANGALAM. R3 & R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR. I.V. PRAMOD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 36141 OF 2007 C = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 1st January, 2008 J U D G M E N T The prayers sought for in this writ petition are the following: a) issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction or order call for records leading to Ext. P3. b) to issue a direction or order to the Sub Registrar to quash Ext. P3 in so far as it concerns petitioner's property. c) to issue a direction to the Tahsildar to accept the tax with regard to petitioner's property in Sy. No. 138/1 of Elamkunnapuzha. d) to pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant in the circumstances of the case. Ext. P3 is a sale deed that is executed by respondents 1 and 2 in favour of respondents 5, 6 and 7. According to the petitioner, the land belongs to her and the sale deed executed is a fraudulent one. 2. The relief sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted in proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution. If the petitioner is so aggrieved, it is for the petitioner to challenge Ext. P3 before an WPC No. 36141/07 -2- appropriate civil court. In view of this, without expressing anything on the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-