IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.16842 CAT of 2010 Date of decision : 20.9.2010 Surinder Pal Sharma … Petitioner Versus Union Territory, Chandigarh through Chief Engineer and others. …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr.Justice M.M.Kumar Hon’ble Ms.Justice Ritu Bahri Present: Mr.Hari Om Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.Kumar, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that finding recorded in para No.10 of the order of the learned Tribunal, which is subject matter of challenge in the instant petition, the weightage of service rendered by the petitioner during the Emergency in the Army w.e.f. 28.6.1965 to 10.1.1968, has not been given. However, the learned Tribunal has observed that weightage has been given, which according to the petitioner is incorrect. The remedy available to the petitioner lies in seeking review of that order for correction of mistake instead of rushing to this Court by invoking jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. The writ petition is disposed of and the petitioner is relegated to avail the remedy available to him, before the tribunal for review of its order. (M.M.Kumar ) Judge (Ritu Bahri) Judge 20.09.2010 sd