COCP No. 1143 of 2009 1 In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … COCP No. 1143 of 2009 Date of decision: July 3,2009 Ajit Singh son of Milkha Singh ..Petitioner. Versus Joginder Singh and others ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Ms. Anju Sharma, Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. Simran Chahal, Advocate for the respondent Nos.2 to 4. .. R.K.Garg,J(Oral). As per the averments made in this petition, petitioner had filed a civil suit for specific performance of agreement dated 18.2.1989 against respondent Nos.1 to 3 as well as one Parkasho. The aforesaid suit of the petitioner was decreed vide judgment and decree dated 2.3.1996 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nakodar, whereby respondent Nos.1 to 3 were directed to execute the sale deed in favour of the petitioner as per agreement dated 18.2.1989. Respondent Nos.1 to 3 preferred an appeal against the aforesaid judgment and decree of the trial Court. Parkasho also filed an appeal against the aforesaid judgment and decree. Both the appeals were decided by the Additional District Judge, Jalandhar vide its judgment and decree dated 15.9.1999 upholding the judgment and decree of the trial Court. Respondent Nos.1 to 3 filed RSA No. 4320 of 1999 in which vide order dated 24.4.2000, execution of the impugned decree was stayed. The petitioners have alleged in this contempt petition that the respondents are raising construction over the property in dispute and thus have violated the interim order dated 24.4.2000 passed by this Court and therefore, contempt proceedings should be initiated against them and they be punished suitably. COCP No. 1143 of 2009 2 I have heard learned counsel for the parties. In my view, vide order dated 24.4.2000, no restraint order has been passed against the respondents restraining them from raising construction on the property in dispute which is in their possession . Vide aforesaid order, this court has stayed execution of the decree only. Thus I find no ground to proceed with the present contempt petition. Dismissed. July 3, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE