(1) WP4289-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4289 OF 2010 Ramesh s/o Ramrao Patil and others PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. M.M. Nerlikar, advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. Mr. V.D. Hon, advocate for the respondent No. 3. Mr. E.P. Sawant, advocate for the respondent No. 4. ..... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 27th JULY, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. The petitioners are citizens who have been allotted tenements under a Scheme, namely, "Walmiki Ambedkar Awas Yojana". According to the petitioners, the tenements allotted to them are substandard and, therefore, an enquiry should be conducted by this Court under its writ jurisdiction by appointing an Experts' Committee to ascertain the quality of construction. Another prayer which is sought is for a direction to decide the petitioners' representations dated 12th April, 2010 and 19th April, 2010. (2) WP4289-10 2. Pursuant to orders passed by this Court, the Collector has conducted an inspection of the tenements and submitted a report which is placed on record before us. The Collector has found that the tenements are habitable and the construction work is satisfactory. 3. The learned advocate for the petitioners does not press prayer "B" with regard to the representations not being decided by the respondents. However, he insists that this Court, under its writ jurisdiction, should conduct the aforesaid enquiry by appointing an Experts' Committee to ascertain the quality of work carried out by the respondent No. 4. 4. In our opinion, it is impossible for this Court under its writ jurisdiction to decide on the quality or the nature of the construction carried out by respondent No. 4. We do not feel it necessary to appoint a Committee of Experts as prayed for, as the Collector on the directions of this Court has already found that the construction work is satisfactory and the tenements are habitable. (3) WP4289-10 5. If the petitioners have a grievance about the Collector's report or about the quality of construction, they may avail of remedies which are available to them before an appropriate forum, whether Civil or Criminal. The petition is rejected. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.] npj/wp4289-10