AB 728/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLETHE MR. JUSTICE P.K.MUSAHARY Heard Mr. S.Borthakur, learned counsel for the accused petitioner and Mr. K.Muni r, learned Addl.PP appearing for the State. The informant is the wife of the accused petitioner. She has mad e a complaint that the accused petitioner demanded Rs.1,50,000.00 from her paren ts and he has been torturing her for not being able to pay the said amount. I ha ve perused the case diary as produced today in connection with FIR Case No. 76/2 010 under section 498(A) IPC. The accused petitioner is a daily wager earner and he has expressed his willingness to bring back his informant wife. There is som e material against the accused regarding torture. But there is no such materials on dowry demand. Considering the aforesaid position, the interim bail grante d on 16.3.2011 is made absolute on the same terms and condition subject to the c ondition that he shall appear before the IO concerned once in every week till su bmission of the charge sheet / FR and that he shall make every endeavor to bring back his estranged wife and live a peaceful conjugal life. The bail application stands disposed of.