IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7196 OF 2005 ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.7197 OF 2005 ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.7198 OF 2005 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:------------------------------------ Mr.S.G.Kudle for the petitioners. Mr.R.D.Rane AGP for respondent no.1. Mr.R.V.More for respondent no.2. CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATED: 19TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED: 19TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED: 19TH OCTOBER, 2005 P.C.: . All these three petitions are directed against the order passed by the Returning Officer accepting nomination papers for the village panchayat election process. The election process is going on. The voting will take place in few days. It is settled principle of law that when the election process is going on the writ jurisdiction should not be exercised in that process. Apart from this position in law the petitioners have adequate alternate remedy by moving under section 16 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 in which the petitioners can establish disqualification even after a person has been elected. We see no reason to interfere in the petitions. The petitions are, therefore, dismissed. ...