THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5613 of 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 CPC is filed by the judgment debtor in O.S.No.850 of 2007 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nellore. The respondent/plaintiff has obtained a money decree against the petitioner/defendant in the aforesaid suit. To enforce the said decree, she has filed E.P.No.968 of 2007 under Order XXI Rules 54, 66 and 64 CPC to attach and sell the EP Schedule property for regularization of the E.P. amount covered by the decree in O.S.No.850 of 2007. In the aforesaid execution proceedings, the petitioner has raised an objection that the EP Schedule property cannot be sold because it is a channel poramboke land. Before the trial Court, on behalf of the petitioner/judgment debtor, R.Ws.1 and 2 were examined and got marked Exs.R.1 to 4. Though the evidence discloses that the lands covered by Survey Nos.540, 541 and 569 situated in Nellore Bit-II Village are classified as poramboke lands, there was absolutely no evidence adduced by the petitioner to show that EP Schedule property is constructed in the land, which is classified as poramboke land. The trial Court considered the evidence on record and allowed E.P. In this revision, it is contended by Sri P.Sridhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner that the channel poramboke land cannot be sold as there is a prohibition for sale of such lands but it is to be noticed that EP Schedule property is a house covered by No.27/365/1. Unless there is evidence on record to show that such house property is constructed on the land covered by channel poramboke, the plea of the petitioner cannot be accepted. I have also perused the copy of the impugned order. The trial Court has elaborately considered the evidence on record and arrived at the just conclusion based on the evidence. For the aforesaid reasons, I do not find any illegality or error of jurisdiction committed by the trial Court in the impugned order, which warrants interference under Section 115 CPC. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is liable to be dismissed. Further, it is stated that pursuant to the order of this Court dated 10.12.2010, half of the decretal amount has already been deposited. In that view of the matter, the petitioner/judgment debtor is permitted to deposit the remaining amount within a period of two (2) months from today and till such time, no steps shall be taken pursuant to enforcement of the impugned order. Subject to the above, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 9th JUNE, 2011. kvni