IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.708 of 2006 BHOLA RAM, SON OF LATE LAXMAN RAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PINJRAOI, P.O. RAMASARH, P.S. SANDESH DISTRICT BHOJPUR. Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, 6 SARDAR PATEL MARG, PATNA. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, 6 SARDAR PATEL MARG, PATNA. 3. STATE OFFICER, BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, PATNA. 4. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION, BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, PATNA. 5. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH SUB-DIVISION NO.2. BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, PATNA. 6. JUNIOR ENGINEER, BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, P.H.D., DIVISION, BAHADURPUR, PATNA. 7. REVENUE OFFICER, BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, PATNA. ----------- 04. 24.01.2011 In compliance of my order dated 20.01.2011 the Managing Director, Bihar State Housing Board(hereinafter referred to as the Board) is present and regrets the circumstance in which direction for his personal appearance was issued by this Court. He also assures the Court that in future such thing shall not happen. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the Board. 3. Petitioner is aggrieved by the instruction of the Revenue Officer of the Board dated 30.7.2005, Annexure-5, whereunder he has been called upon to deposit 1,16,050/- by 31.8.2005 towards the revised cost of the flat allotted to the petitioner vide allotment letter dated 4.8.2001. Initially petitioner was asked to deposit 1,19,306/- towards the cost of the flat, which amount petitioner deposited much before the time granted for such deposit. There is no reason at all for revising the price of the flat under the impugned communication dated - 2 - 30.7.2005, Annexure-5. 4. Let petitioner along with his legal representative appear before the Managing Director of the Board on 27.01.2011 when calculation chart indicating the details shall be provided to the petitioner on the basis of which further amount of 1,16,050/- has been directed to be deposited by the petitioner. Having received the calculation chart with details petitioner shall be allowed two weeks’ time to rebut the assertions made in the calculation chart and after receipt of the rebuttal from the petitioner, the Managing Director shall pass appropriate order in the matter, as early as possible in any case within two weeks from the date of receipt of the rebuttal from the petitioner. 5. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)