P.R.N pyesentedh o XI-HC—78 ® WW,WW,W WW(W} mam, wmm ‘WWEWw ' $Wm ‘ ; pa Soma mmm 30-8-2006 Mr. Vishnu Koshta, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Satish Gupta, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the State/respbndents, ‘ on‘advance copy. I Heard both the counsel. By the instant writ. petiticn under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia, the petitioner has challenged his transfer order dated 29-7-2006 (Annexure ‘P-2) passed by respondent No.3, whereby he has been transferred from Middle $chool, ‘:Saarwandi to Primary School, Karaki, Block: Durgukondal. The said transfer has been made under the rationalization scheme. Clause 7 of the rationalization scheme provides for an appeal by the aggrieved person. petitioner submits that the petitioner has >re respondent No.2 on 4-8-2006 and that aspondent No.2, therefore, respondent No.2 to whichlearned counsel appearing for the Hsel for the parties and having regard to the ase, respondent No.2 is directed to decide l 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy Learned counsel. for the already preferred an appeal befr appeal is not being decided by r be directed to decide the appeal State/respondents has no objectic‘ Having heard learned cou facts and circumstances of the c the appeal of the petitioner withir of this order, in accordance with law. With the direction aforesait Consequently, M.(W.)P.Nc n. i, the petition stands disposed of. 3544/2006 also stands disposed of. , Sdl- L.C. Bhadoo‘ Judge w /