IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31652 of 2010 RAJ KUMAR MARKARY, Son of Late Ganesh Prasad, Resident of Village – Ander Gaya Panch, Mohalla – Baithak, P.S. – Civil Line, District - Gaya . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 5 04.03.2011 Heard Mr. Sheikh Arkan Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ashok Kumar Singh No. I, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The petitioner who is in custody in Kotwali P.S. Case No. 306 of 2009 for the offence under Sections 395, 397 & 412 of the Indian Penal Code has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been made accused on confession made by one co-accused Md. Arshi @ Shaquib @ Arshi Kunjra. However, Md. Arshi has already been extended the privilege of bail on 8.7.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 18306 of 2010. Accordingly, it has been prayed that the petitioner may be granted bail similar to co-accused Md. Arshi. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has strongly opposed the prayer for bail. It was submitted that petitioner was also put on T.I. Parade and petitioner was identified by the informant. The court is of the opinion that petitioner’s case cannot be equated with the case of Md. Arshi who has been granted bail. Prayer for bail stands rejected. In this case antecedent report of the petitioner was also called for which shows that he is accused in other four cases also. Praful /- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)