IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39900 of 2009 RANJIT KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ---------- 3. 08.03.2010 Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Sheikhpura P.S.Case no. 26 of 2009 u/s 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. Heard. Another accused Ram Ratan Prasad was found using a forged certificate in course of counseling for appointment of teachers and, on enquiry, he also confessed that he had obtained the forged certificate from one Vinay Kumar for Rs.5,000/-. He also gave this confessional statement in writing. Subsequently, when his further statement was recorded by Police, he named the petitioner stating his alias name as Vinay Kumar @ Ranjit Kumar and thereafter the petitioner has been made accused in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that bail prayer of the petitioner was rejected by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sheikhpura on the materials in Paras 8, 45, 57, 58, 59, 60 & 64 of the case diary. Learned counsel submits that in these paragraphs it is simply mentioned that the petitioner’s house was raided and steps were taken for his apprehension, but there is nothing to show his complicity in the alleged offence by showing that the allegedly forged certificate was in the writing of the petitioner and that he was engaged in selling the certificate for Rs.5,000/-, as alleged. Further submission is that co-accused Ram Ratan Prasad has been allowed regular bail by the learned Sessions Judge, Munger by his order 2 dated 26th February 2009 under B.A. No. 284 of 2009. Mr.R.P.S.Singh, A.P.P. does not point out any other material. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within two weeks, petitioner Ranjit Kumar shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- ( ten thousand ) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case no. 26 of 2009. Jay/ ( C. M. Prasad,J )