1 Criminal Application No.1694/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1694 OF 2011 Dattatraya @ Datta s/o Baburao Panchal ... APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ... RESPONDENT ..... Shri Ashok Ghuge, Advocate holding for Shri S.A. Ambad, Advocate for applicant Shri N.B. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 4th May, 2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard finally. Varsha married to the accused/ applicant on 25.5.2010 and it is within four months of her marriage, she succumbed by inhaling insecticide (Endosulfan) as certified by the office of Chemical Analyser, dated 10.12.2010. In the night, preceding her death i.e. 13.9.2010, Varsha had telephonically informed her brother of her extensive suffering at the hands of the accused and other family members and she may die on the same day or the next day and the event has taken place. 2 Criminal Application No.1694/2011 2. Even if the accused/ applicant as husband has carried the deceased to hospital, that does not mean to enlarge him on bail. Even if charge sheet is filed, the brutality in which the demands were made and made the life of deceased miserable, does not call for bail. The principle of parity repeatedly highlighted, will not be available as role of the accused/ applicant is quite different indicated by witnesses. Application rejected, finally disposed of. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/cri1694.11