IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8688 of 2008 1. TEJ NARAYAN SINGH @ TEJ NARAIN AHIR SON OF RAJ KISHORE SINGH @ RAJ KISHORE AHIR. 2. MUNESHWAR SINGH @ MUNESHWAR AHIR SON OF LATE RAJ KISHORE SINGH @ RAJ KISHORE AHIR 3. RAM NARAYAN SINGH @ RAM NARAYAN AHIR 4. HARI NARAYAN SINGH @ HARI NARAYAN AHIR 5. CHHOTAK SINGH @ CHOTAK AHIR NOS. 3 TO 5 SONS OF LATE NAND KISHORE SINGH @ NAND KISHORE AHIR 6. LAKSHAMAN SINGH @ LAKSHAMAN AHIR 7. JAI PRAKASH SINGH @ JAI PRAKASH AHIR NOS. 6 TO 7 SON OF RAM JANAM SINGH @ RAM JANAM AHIR. 8. SRINIWASH SINGH @ SRINIVASH AHIR SON OF LATE NAGINA SINGH @ NAGINA AHIR 9. RAJENDRA SINGH @ RAJENDRA AHIR SON OF MUNESHWAR @ MUNESHWAR AHIR 10. ALOK SINGH @ ALOK AHIR SON OF TEJ NARAYAN SINGH @ TEJ NARAYAN AHIR. ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE GOPINATHPUR, P.S.- ITRAHI, DISTRICT- BUXAR. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAMAWATAR SINGH SON OF LATE RAMJADI SINGH, R/O- VILLAGE GOPINATHPUR, P.S.- ITARHI, DISTRICT- BUXAR. ----------- 7 08.10.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioners are aggrieved by order dated 8.11.2007 passed in Tr. No. 3304 of 2007 whereby on a consideration of the materials placed along with the charge-sheet, learned court below has taken cognizance under Sections, 147, 148, 149, 447, 323, 325, 427 and 504 of Indian Penal Code on being satisfied that a prima facie case is reflected from the materials on record. Considering the confines of jurisdiction invoked by the learned court below, this Court is satisfied that the order does not merit interference. Petitioners shall have adequate opportunity to 2 raise/agitate grievance at the appropriate state of the proceeding. The application is disposed of. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )