IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 31ST DECEMBER 2010 / 10TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 38746 of 2010(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- LAW STUDENTS ORGANISATION, (REG.NO.T 533/10), REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, PADMAJA DEVI S.P., CHANJAM VEEDU AVENUE,MALLOOR ROAD, VANCHIYOOR, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.I.SHAHUL HAMEED RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC. UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.SURENDRAMOHAN, J. --------------------------------------- WP (C) No. 38746 of 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a registered association of law students. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the examination schedule published by the University of Kerala. The complaint of the petitioner is that as per the examination schedule the LLB examinations are scheduled to be conducted on daily basis without giving any break in between. According to the petitioner, a break is given only after two examinations which are scheduled on consecutive days. The present schedule puts the students to a lot of inconvenience and trouble. Therefore, the petitioner seeks the issue of a writ of mandamus or some other appropriate writ, order or direction to change the examination schedule in such a manner as to have each examination conducted on alternate days. 2. I notice that the petitioner organisation is not seeking to enforce any legal right of theirs. The WP (C) No. 38746 of 2010 2 petitioner's organization does not have any right to claim that the examinations should be scheduled and conducted on alternate days. It is for the University, the expert body, to schedule and conduct the examinations in a manner that is deemed fit and proper by it. In such academic matters it is not at all desirable for this Court to interfere and give directions so as to upset the entire examination schedule. I find no merit in this writ petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. K.SURENDRAMOHAN, JUDGE. rkc