IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.97 of 2008 SANTOSH KUMAR PATHAK Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 15.12.2008 KHAN The petitioner is the informant of Phulwarisharif (Gopalpur O.P.) P.S. Case No.95 of 2007 under section 302/34 of the Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. He submits that at the time of lodging the complaint his signature was taken on a plain paper and the persons who are not accused has been named as an accused. He further submits that subsequently he filed a representation giving the name of the accused. Learned counsel for the State controverts the allegation of the petitioner and submits that earlier the petitioner has given the names of the accused persons as mentioned in the F.I.R., but subsequently he has filed a petition stating that some other persons are accused in the instant case. He further submits that the Superintendent of Police (Rural), Patna has issued a direction to the Investigating Officer to make an investigation on the basis of subsequent petition filed by the informant. In view of the aforesaid fact, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the investigation should be concluded within four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (S.P.Singh,J) - 2 -