HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dil4> Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. Appetlant Claimant Respondents M.A.C.No. 824 of 2007 Tulsiram, Son of Late Shri Samaroe Dewangan, aged about 40 yeare. resident of Village Jara, Police Station Kasdol, Tahsil Palari, Disfricd Raipur (CG) Versus 1. Fattelat, son of Shri Btalhram Dhritlahre, aged about 30 yeaps, resident of Purani Basti, Balodabazar, Distrwt Raipur (CG) (Driver) •, 2. Mohammed Asif, Son of Shri Abdul Gaffar, resident of Behru Chowk, Balodabazar, District Raipur (G©) (Owner <?f tfie Vehjcte) 3. The New India Insurance Company Limited, CMI Lines, Balodabassar, District Raipur (CG) (Insurer) 4. KumarrBai, Wldow of Late Shri Samaroo Dewangan, aged about 35 years, resident of Vtllage Jara, Police Station Kasdol, TahsilPatari. Distrirt Raipur (CG) (ClaJmantNo.2) Memo oyaDpeal under Section 173 (21 ofthe MetorVehicles Act T988 Present: Shri P.P. Sahu, eounsel for the appetlant. Shri Dashrath Gupta, coimset for respondent No.S/lnsurance Company. ORALORDER (Passed on 16.09.2008) This is a claimant's appeat for enhancement of compensatfon awarded by the ^ Additjonal Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (henceforth the 'Tribuh?!), Batodabazar JB claims case No.C^2006 vide awarddated 17/01/2007. ,~^ (2) During tiie course of the arguments, a s^tement was amved at between the learned counsel for the parttes vNhereunder ttie respondent No.S/insurance company agreedto pay an addiBonai sum of Rs.15,000/- over and above the amount of aanpensation awarded by the Tribunal, within a period of two months from today. (3) Agreeing to the above ssttlement, learoed counsel for the appellant prayed ttiat this appeal may be disposed of. (4) tn view of the setUement arriwd at, the appeal standB disposed <rf. ~ Priya Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge y doiiga^ '\ ! FT