HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO & HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA W.P.No.11668 of 2011 ORDER: (Per BPR,J): The main grievance of the petitioner-firm in this writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is that the respondents did not extend the time granted by the Debts Recovery Tribunal,Visakhapatnam (for brevity ‘the Trbunal’) to deposit the amount as directed in I.A.No.656 of 2010 in S.A.No.237 of 2010. It is stated in the affidavit that having regard to the fact that due to the external pressure and consequential declaring of petitioner as NPA, it suffered huge set back and that the authorities concerned failed to serve possession notice personally on it. Hence it could not comply with the conditional order. Therefore, it seeks further time for compliance. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier, this Court has passed similar order in the same set of facts and circumstances in W.P.No.10935 of 2011, dated 19-04-2011. 4. Following the said order in W.P.No.10935 of 2011, dated 19-04-2011 and for the reasons mentioned therein, this writ petition is also disposed of. Accordingly, the time granted by the Tribunal is extended for payment of the amount as mentioned in the possession notice dated 12-10-2010, in two instalments; the 1st instalment shall be paid within a period of one month from today and the 2nd instalment shall be paid within a period of one month thereafter expiry of the 1st instalment in I.A.No.656 of 2010 in S.A.No.237 of 2010 on the file of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO Date: 25th April 2011 _______________________ JUSTICE B.N RAO NALLA Note: Wire at party’s costs. B/o. kvr