WP(C) 5769/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. A.K. Goswami, learned Senior counsel for the petitioners. Also heard M r. S. Dey, learned counsel representing the respondents 11 and 12. Respondents N o. 6 to 8 and 9 are represented by Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned counsel. The State aut horities are represented by learned Government Advocate, Mr. J. Handique. On the basis of the FIR lodged by the petitioners, the Panbazar P.S. case was re gistered under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957. The case was subsequently re-registered as Panbazar P.S.case No.661/2009. Complaining of tardy progress in the investigation, the writ petition came to be filed by the informants. Therefore the progress of the investigation of the cas e was given to the Court from time to time and now it appears that the investiga tion is complete and the police have also prepared a final report in the case. In view of above, I do not find any justification to keep this case pending any further and the same is ordered to be closed as the law would now take its own c ourse on the basis of the report given by the police. It is ordered accordingly.