CRP 347/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I A ANSARI Heard Mr. S. Nath, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner. By order, dated 25.05.2011, passed by the learned Munsiff No. 1, Dhubri, in Misc . (J) Case No. 168/2011, the defendant’s [the petitioner herein] prayer for adjo urnment of Title Suit No. 348/2006 was rejected. The reason, assigned by the Co urt, for not allowing the defendant’s prayer for adjournment was that the defend ant had already obtained several adjournments in the past. No infirmity, legal or factual, could be pointed out by the petitioner in the order of the learned C ourt below rejecting the defendant’s prayer for adjournment. The responsibility to control a trial is that of the trial Court and, when the t rial Court points out that because there had been several adjournments granted t o a party in the past, no more time could be allowed, interference with the orde r of the trial Court is not possible in exercise of the High Court’s power under Article 227 of the Constitution, for, such an order is not without jurisdiction . This apart, even if there were two views possible, the trial Court’s view can not be interfered with by taking recourse to Article 227 unless the view, taken by the trial Court, can be shown to be irrational, arbitrary or so unreasonable that it shocks the conscience of the Court. No such thing has happened in the p resent case. In the circumstances, as indicated above, this Court does not find that the peti tioner has been able to make out any case warranting interference with the order , dated 25.05.2011, aforementioned and/or with the order, dated 23.08.2011, whic h was subsequently passed by the learned trial Court rejecting the defendant’s p rayer seeking modification of the order, dated 25.05.2011, aforementioned. For the reasons discussed above, while the petition is not admitted, the petitio ner is given the liberty to take the ground of non-adjournment of TS No. 348/200 6 in the learned appellate Court if the suit is decided against him. With the above observations and directions, this revision petition stands dispos ed of.