IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26568 OF 2001 Between: 1 Smt.P. Swarna Prasad, W/o. Siva Rama Prasada Rao, Hindu, r/o.Dr.No.56-11-19/2, M.G. Road, Patamata, Vijayawada-1. 2 Smt.B. Revati Vijaya Josha, W/o. Vidyasagar Rao, Hindu, r/o.Dr.No.56-11-19/2,x W.G.Road, Patamata, Vijayawada-1. 3 Smt.P. Sunitha, w/o. P.R.V. Srisha, Hindu, r/o.Dr.No.56-11-19/2, Rtnamamba St., Moghalirajapuram, Vijayawada-10. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Vijayawada-Guntur-Tenali-Mangalagiri Urban Development Authority, Rep.by its Vice Chairman, Governorpet, Vijayawada-2. 2 The Planning Officer, Vijayawada-Guntur-Tenali-Mangalagiri Urban Development Authority, Governorpet, Vijayawada-2. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the Proceedings bearing No.R.C.C8/839/2000 dated 18.12.2001 passed by the 1st respondent confirming the Order passed by the 2nd respondent through his Proceedings bearing No.C8/836/2000 dated 10.10.2001 as illegal and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and also the mandatory provisions of the A.P. Urban Areas (Development) Act, 1975 and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.V.S.R.ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondent No. : MRS K.ARUNA KUMARI The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioners Smt. P. Swarna Prasad, Smt. B. Revati Vijaya Josha and Smt. P.Sunitha for a direction to the respondents not to demolish the structures made in R.S.No.241/4 of Kanuru Village of Krishna District. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners reports that after filing of this writ petition, a scheme for regularization of the unauthorized constructions has come into force, as such, a direction may be given to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners under that scheme. 3. In view of the representation of the learned counsel, the respondents are directed that the case of the petitioners may be considered under the regularization scheme, if any, of unauthorized constructions as per the usual norms. Further, there shall not be any demolition of the structures in question for a period of three months, as some time might be required for consideration of the case of the petitioners for regularisation. 4. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ____________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J July 24, 2009. PV/YVL