IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated : Nainital the 27th day of July 2005 Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 650/2005 Order on the bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Sehenoub S/o Shri Mohabbat Ali R/o village Akbarpur Dhadeki P.S. Manglaur District Haridwar ..........Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal ..........Opposite Party Arising out of case crime No. 73 of 2005 U/s 386/506 I.P.C. P.S. Gangneher District Haridwar ________________________________________________________ Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Heard Sri Manish Arora learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. Perused the record. The learned counsel for the applicant contended that co-accused Meherbaan has a shop in front of the complainant’s shop at Rampur and the present applicant was doing the work on the shop of Meherbaan. This fact has also been alleged in the affidavit. This fact has not been denied and the learned counsel for the applicant further contended that there is no probability that a person will thereaten to other person, who has also a shop in front of him. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is a fit case for bail. Let the applicant-accused be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated: 27.7.2005 LSR