IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25222 of 2011 1. Haridutt Mishra, son of Radha Krishna Mishra 2. Daya Shankar Mishra, son of haridutt Mishra 3. ajay Kumar Mishra, son of Haridutt Mishra 4. Shiv Shankar Mishra, son of Haridutt Mishra 5. Uma Shankar Mishra, son of Haridutt Mishra 6. Santosh Kumar Mishra, son of Haridutt Mishra 7. Sandhya Devi, wife of Santosh Kumar Mishra (All residents of village – Panditpur, P.S. – Buxar Mufassil, District – Buxar). -------- Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar -----Opposite Party ***** 02. 30.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners, apprehends their arrest in connection with Buxar (T) P.S. Case No. 18/2011, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with respect to petitioner no. 1 namely, Haridutt Mishra. As submitted, he has already been arrested by the police. Hence, this application becomes infructuous. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail with respect to petitioner no. 1 namely, Haridutt Mishra, stands dismissed as withdrawn. Further submission is that against petitioner nos. 2 to 6 there is no allegation levelled, only against petitioner no. 7 there is allegation of provoking the mob, but, since before there is some dispute between petitioner no. 7 and local Mukhiya. So she has been implicated in this case. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner nos. 2 to 7, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, in connection with Buxar (T) P.S. Case No. 18/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)