IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6441 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 20.10.2011 Sanjay Arora ...Petitioner Versus Om Parkash Madan and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Rohit Ahuja, Advocate for the petitioner. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the dispute in the present case relates to sale deed dated 02.06.2005. As per cross examination, the plaintiff had stated that he had made payment of 3,70,000/- in cash as sale consideration at time of execution of the sale deed and Rs. 8,30,000/- was also paid in cash few days prior to the execution of the sale deed and this fact can be verified by income tax returns and balance sheets. Thereafter, respondent Nos.1 and 2 moved an application that direction be given to the petitioner/plaintiff to produce Income Tax Return for assessment year 2004-05 to 2010-11 along with balance sheets. Vide order dated 29.09.2011, learned trial Court allowed the said application and directed the petitioner/plaintiff to produce the Income Tax returns as well as balance sheet for assessment year 2004-05 to 2010-11. Since the dispute in the present case relates to the sale deed dated 02.06.2005, the petitioner/plaintiff is not required to produce Income Tax Returns for the assessment year 2004-05 to 2010-11 Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. Order dated 29.09.2011 is modified that the plaintiff will produce the Income Tax returns as well as balance sheet for year 2004-05, 2005-06 and 2006-07. October 20, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) G.Arora JUDGE