... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.842 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.842 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.842 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.707 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.707 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.707 OF 2006 Shri Sopan Anandrao Rajguru ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Shri C.M.Kothari for the Applicant. Shri A.S.Shitole, A.P.P. for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : AUGUST 21, 2006. : AUGUST 21, 2006. : AUGUST 21, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocates appearing for the parties. The Appeal is already admitted on 16th August, 2006. 2. It is not in dispute that the Applicant was on bail throughout the trial. The sentence awarded to the Applicant is of one year. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail pending the final disposal of the Appeal. 3. Hence, Application is disposed of by directing that the Applicant shall be enlarged on the same bail on which he was enlarged during the pendency of the trial subject to filing fresh bail bonds within a period of three weeks from today. It is made clear that prayer for suspension of conviction is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE