IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39364 of 2009 BABLOO YADAV SON OF SRI SUBHASH PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NAYA TOLA KUMHRAR, P.S.- AGAMKUAN, DISTRICT- PATNA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18/11/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 16.4.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3634 of 2009 considering the fact that he is the husband of the deceased. The case was initially registered under sections 342, 498A, 307 Indian Penal Code but after death section 304 B IPC was added. All the defence which the petitioner has taken here has been considered on the earlier occasion when his prayer for bail was refused. Submission is that the petitioner is in custody since 16.4.2008 and some other accused persons have been admitted to bail. In a case of section 304 B IPC, case of the husband of the deceased cannot be equated with the other accused persons who have been admitted to bail. I do not see to a take a different view from the earlier. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner is again rejected. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)