0/Q .. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR ' Petitioner haneshwar Pmsad Kaivert Versus Respondents State of Chhatu'sgarh an others d (Writ Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitun‘on of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihoui J.) Shri As'hwani Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. - Passed on this 18th day of November, 2009) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the pe1itioner submits that the petitioner doe not want to contest this petition on merits, at this stage and prays for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to make a representation in the light of the cincular dated 27. 12.2008 (Annexure P/ 2). 2. Shri Roy, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the respondents] State submits that if a representation is made, the s shall be considered and decided within a period of three weeks h‘om the date of receipt of the represenation, in the light of the above stated ciular, as well as the orer date 20 rc d d .1.2009 (Annexure P/3), passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 6128/2007 (Jagannath R Vs. The State of Chhath'sgarh &, others) and other connected matters. 3. In View of the forégoing, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above-stated libety. It is expected that the concerned authoriu'es would consider and decide the representation, if any, as above, within period of three weeks hem the date of receipt of the representation alng with a copy of this order. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri f Judge 'ihmane Writ Peution (S) No. 6726 of 2009 D o R D E moia1) ( s ame t am r a o i 2