HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.Nos. 5551, 5592 and 5596 of 2010 DATE: 16-12-2010 C.R.P.No.5551 of 2010: Between: K.R. Inder Karan …….. petitioner and Mohd. Younus …….. respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.Nos. 5551, 5592 and 5596 of 2010 COMMON ORDER: Since these three Revision Petitions arose out of the same proceedings, they are taken up together for disposal. The petitioners in these Revision Petitions are one and the same, who is the plaintiff. He filed these three Revision Petitions against the orders, dated 19-10-2010 in I.A.Nos.351, 352 and 353 of 2010 in O.S.No.4440 of 2008 on the file of the II Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad, respectively, which were filed to reopen the case and receive objections to the report of the Commissioner; to recall DW-1 and examine him with regard to Advocate Commissioner’s Report; and to summon the Advocate Commissioner to give evidence, respectively. The Court below, after taking into account the chequered events and especially observing that in spite of the fact that opportunity being provided to the petitioner, the same was not availed by him, dismissed all the applications. Having heard the learned counsel on either side and also on perusal of the material especially in view of the observations of the Court below about the non-availability of the opportunity provided to the petitioner, he cannot seek any indulgence once again. Hence, I do not find any grounds to interfere with the impugned orders. The Civil Revision Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J Date: 16-12-2010 YCR