IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4163 of 2010 1. ANIL SINGH, S/o Late Lakhandeo Singh. 2. Sunil Singh, S/o Late Lakhandeo Singh. 3. Pawan Singh, S/o Late Lakhandeo Singh. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05. 05.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act. The allegation against the petitioners in the First Information Report is that when the informant failed to pay rangdari to Santosh Singh he fired upon him but there is no specific overt act against the petitioners nor do they have any criminal antecedents. In view of such, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 40 of 2005 subject to the - 2 - following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)