IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 794 of 2001 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- BHARAT AGRICULTURAL CORPORATION Versus KRISHNAKANT MADHUSUDAN SHROFF -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Civil Revision Application No. 794 of 2001 MR NILESH A PANDYA for Petitioner No. 1 MR PV NANAVATI for Respondent No. 1 MR VIBHUTI NANAVATI for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 05/10/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT Rule. Mr.Nanavaty, learned Counsel for the respondent waives service of rule. By consent the revision application is taken up for final hearing. The learned Counsel for the respondent states that he has no objection if fresh proclamation is issued under Order 21 Rule 67. The impugned order passed by the Executing Court is set aside and the Executing Court is directed to issue fresh proclamation under Order 21 Rule 67 of the Civil Procedure Code and proceed further in accordance with law. Rule is made absolute accordingly. 5-10-2001 (M.C.Patel, J.) vinod