IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35785 of 2010 PANKAJ KUMAR TEWARY SON OF DINESH TEWARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 21.12.2010 Supplementary affidavit filed today be kept on the record. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence u/s.364A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 6.10.2009 vide Cr.Misc.No.27668 of 2009. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail on the ground that after four witnesses were declared hostile the fifth witness i.e. the informant was examined, who did not identify the petitioner in dock. Considering that before the petitioner was sought to be identified by the witness in the dock he had named the petitioner and specifically asserted that from his possession injections and vials were recovered. In view of such, I am not inclined to review the said order. The prayer for bail is once again rejected. The trial court shall take expedient steps to conclude the trial. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )