S.B.Cr. Misc. Petition No.1335/2007 (Kaushik Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) Date of Order : February 25, 2008 HON'BLE MR. H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr.P.C.Solanki, for the petitioner. The only grievance of the petitioner is that while granting monthly allowance of interim maintenance, the court below has granted monthly allowance of interim maintenance from the date of filing of application without assigning any reason. From plain reading of section 125(2) Cr.P.C., it is clear that it is the discretion to the Court trying such matters to grant maintenance either from the date of order or from the date of application. However, earlier, Division Bench of this Court in Smt. Savita Sharma vs. Shri Krishan Murari, 1990 (1) RLR 400 held that the maintenance should be from the date of application. In this view of the matter, I do not find any error, illegality or perversity in the order impugned warranting interference in inherent jurisdiction. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. However, the trial court is directed to decide the main petition filed under section 125 Cr.P.C. utmost expeditiously preferably within six months. [H.R.PANWAR],J. m.asif/- S.B.Cr.Misc. Stay Petition No.717/2007 In S.B.Cr. Misc. Petition No.1335/2007 (Kaushik Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) Date of Order : February 25, 2008 HON'BLE MR. H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr.P.C.Solanki, for the petitioner. As the main petition has been dismissed, stay petition also stands dismissed. [H.R.PANWAR],J. m.asif/-