AB 79/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE H. BARUAH Heard Mr. P.Kataki learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. K.Munir, learned Addl. P.P representing the State respondents. A careful perusal of the materials available in the Case Diary do not sp eak any substantial materials sufficient to reject the application under Sectio n 438 Cr.P.C. Mr. Kataki, learned Counsel; in support of the application contend s that the petitioners herein are the father and brothers and sister-in-law of H afijur Rahman who had taken the daughter of the first in formant, a minor one. I t is also contended that neither of the petitioners is involved in the alleged o ffence nor pursuaded in taking the girl from the lawful custody of the first inf ormant. Since the materials available in the Case Diary do not reflect anything substantial against the petitioners, I do not propose to reject the bail applica tion U/S 438 Cr.P.C. It is accordingly allowed. Accordingly, it is provided that the petitioners namely 1. Md. Badsha Mia, 2. Md . Abdul Karim, 3. Md. Mohar Uddin, 4. Md. Tahur Uddin and 5. Musstt.Maina Khatun in the event of their arrest shall be released on bail on furnishing a Bail Bon d of Rs.10,000/- each with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority in connection with Barpeta P.S. Case No. 1490/2010 on t he conditions that the petitioners shall appear before the I.O. and co-operate with the investigation and they shall not indulge any other activities prejudi cial to the investigation. This bail petition stands disposed of.