HIGH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER RESPONDENTS WRTrPETITION(S) No. 959 of2007 B.K.Rao, S/o Late Shri Bhupat Rao, Age about 58 yeara, Employed as Stores Asaistaiit (Workcharged Establishment) QfBce of the S.D.O./'EM/IffiM/FOM Water Resources Department, Sub Division, Bilaspur. VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through: The Secretwy, Wgter Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Ghadi Chowk, G;E. Road, Raipur. 2. Tlie Supermtetiduig Engineer, E/M Divmoii, Water Resources Departmeat, Raipur. 3. The Executive laigiaeer, E/M H.E.M. Divisioii, Water ResourcesDepartment, Bilaspur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: HoB'ble Shri Satish K. Assdhotn^J. Preseirt: Shri B.P.Rao, Advocate for the petitioner. Scrt Smita Gliai, Paucl Lawyer for tlie State/respoiidents. ORALOKUER (Passed on 28tn day of July, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submite that the subject matter involved int his petition is ah-eady under consideration before fce respondent authorities. Leamed counsel further submits that the respondent authorities may accordinely be directed to decide the matter pending before them, in accordance with law, as expeditieusly as possible, within a prescribed time, to which leamed counsel appearing forthe State/respondents has no objection. 2. Accordinely, the petition is dsposed of with a direction to the authorities that tf the disputed subject matter is pendmg consideration before the respondent authorities, the same may be ccmsidered and disposed of as early as possible, preferably wittan a period of six months. ^- Anut Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge