:1: :1: :1: srp. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1855 OF 2007. WRIT PETITION NO. 1855 OF 2007. WRIT PETITION NO. 1855 OF 2007. Auto Taxi Chalak Malak Sena, Thane...Petitioner. Versus. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. --- R. L. Patil i/b Omkar Warange for the petitioner. Mrs. M. P. Thakur A.G.P. for the State. CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & R.S.MOHITE, JJ. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATE: JUNE 6, 2007. DATE: JUNE 6, 2007. DATE: JUNE 6, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The grievance of the petitioner - Association, i.e., Auto Taxi Chalak Malak Sena is that on the Bazaar day at Palghar when they are flying their vehicles on the given routes they are being intercepted by the Officers of the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation along with the police or the R.T.O. officials and their licences are checked, and it causes inconvenience to the passengers in the vehicles and ultimately thereby their business is affected. To check the licences and to find out as to whether conditions of the licences are obeyed or not is the duty of the respondent No. 2- RTO and if he is discharging the said duties on its own and/or on the complaint of the Corporation or any other person it :2: :2: :2: cannot be said that he is exceeding his powers or jurisdiction while doing so. Therefore, blanket prohibitory order cannot be issued as against the respondent directing them that they shall not inspect and look into the licences of the petitioners. We refrain to entertain the petition. Petition is hereby rejected. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)