IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 20TH OCTOBER 2008 / 28TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 30729 of 2008(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- SANDHYA RAGHAVAN N. UPSA, AKMHSS, POOCHATTY, THRISSUR DT. BY ADV. SRI.D.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THRISSUR. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR. 3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE MANAGER, AKMHSS, POOCHATTY P.O, THRISSUR DT. 5. THE PRINCIPAL, AKMHSS, POOCHATTY P.O, THRISSUR DT. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 30729 OF 2008 (G) ==================== Dated this the 20th day of October, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner was appointed by Ext.P1. By Ext.P2, approval was rejected relying on Ext.P3 Government order, which according to the petitioner has been stayed by this court as is reported in Ext.P4. Against Ext.P2, Manager has filed Ext.P5 appeal before the 1st respondent and though the petitioner also has sought an early disposal of the appeal by filing Ext.P6 representation, there has not been any progress in this matter. It is with this grievance the writ petition has been filed. 2. Now that the appeal filed by the Manager is pending consideration of the 1st respondent, it is only appropriate that the 1st respondent shall dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible. This the 1st respondent shall do with notice to the 4th respondent, at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp