1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. WRIT PETITION NO. 1155 OF 2011 (Ravindra Shaligram Sapkale VS. The State of Maharashtra and anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. V.D. Hon, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S.K. Tambe, A.G.P. for the respondent-State Mr. Sachin Deshmukh, Advocate h/f. Mr. B.S. Mundhe, Advocate for respondent no.2 ... CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 26.08.2011 P.C.:- 1. The limited grievance of the petitioner is that though the Divisional Commissioner vide order dated 30.6.2005 has directed to consider the claim of the petitioner, by giving him an opportunity of hearing, the same is not having been done by the respondent no.2. 2. The Petition is disposed of with a direction to comply with the order of the Divisional Commissioner dated 30.6.2005 by considering the claim of the 2 petitioner after giving him an opportunity of hearing as expeditiously, as possible and in any case, within a period of three (3) months from today. Sd/- Sd/- arp [M.T. JOSHI, J. ] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]