:1: :1: :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.485 OF 2007 Ramesh Kacheshwar Jeughale & Ors. .. Appellants. Vs. Devichand Mishrilal Sanghavi & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.Sandeep K.Shinde h/f Vinod Shah for the appellants. Mr.A.G.Torankar for the respondents. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATED : 9TH AUGUST, 2007. DATED : 9TH AUGUST, 2007. DATED : 9TH AUGUST, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This second appeal is filed by the obstructionists contending that they succeeded to the suit premises as tenants independently and that they are not bound by the decree passed in RCS No.248 of 1986. Both the courts after having considered the entire evidence on record have held that the obstructionists has no independent right in the suit premises either as a tenant or otherwise and they are not entitled to protect their possession. No substantial question of law is either raised or involved in the second appeal. The concurrent findings recorded by the courts below are based on the material on record. I see no reason to interfere with the impugned judgments. The second appeal is dismissed. :2: :2: :2: (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)