gst 1 wp347.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO. 347 OF 2011. Rashida Kamaluddin Sayed . ... .... ..Petitioner V/s Vijaykumar Ramrao Katkar .. .... ..Respondnet. Mr.Abhaykumar Apte, Adv. For the petitioner. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 1st April, 2011 PC: By way of present petition the petitioner challenges the order dated 6.10.2002 vide which the present petitioner prayed for deciding the pending applications prior to the decision of the suit. 2. There are various applications filed by the plaintiff and one application has been filed by the defendant. Learned trial Court has given cogent and sound reasons as to why these applications should be decided at the stage of hearing of the suit. It has been found that in so far as some applications are concerned the predecessor of the learned Judge had directed that the said applications be heard at the stage of hearing of the suit. It has further been found that in so far as some of the applications are concerned, they stand rejected. It has been further observed that the application filed by the defendant directing the payment of additional court fee by plaintiff is concerned would also be decided at the stage of hearing of the suit. It has also been made clear gst 2 wp347.11.sxw that in the event if the learned trial Court finds that additional court fees are to be paid the suit would not be dismissed only on that ground and the plaintiff would be given an opportunity to pay deficit court fees. 3. It has further been found that the respondent-defendant has to travel from Pune to attend to the suits and the applications were nothing else but an attempt to prolong the hearing of the suit. In that view of the matter no case is made out for interference. Writ petition stands dismissed.