^^eyje^ BEFORE_THE STASE AmiNISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AI JABALPIB <C2M3^'& Applicant Respondent b.A.Nb.iyiO/200^ Nirmal K\ ar Jain, S/o Guljari Lal Jain^ Aged 49 years/ R/o Mesonatew28^ Sector-I, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, Chhatisgarh. Vs. Stafce of Madhya Pradeshg, Throughs Principal Secretary^ Commer-' cial Sax Department, Vallabh Bhawan^ Bhopal. APPLIC^IQN UNDER_SECTION 19 OF IHE AmiNISIRAfiyE.IRIBUNAL lCT7-i985- ^ X^-HC-78 w^ ; ^ ^TOI ^qiqioq, t9-a1^l<l<?, Rc»wy< t||*|^| SP'flTf^ ••-^- •p^- -^- •^" i-•h^y-.°-^.....•. 3I1^5T q^P (^cli^elcg) sn^^rwfewp ^CT3TT^^Tfb^tich .siSinha SB: Hon^ble Shri Mantadra 21.01.2010 When fhe matter wa^ fhe petitioner and fhe matt^r rouad, none appears for fhej Shri Arviad Dubey, P4nel Takiag mto consider^don ia fhis petitton, fhe petitio4 reserving Uberty to the petiljione ofaction stiU suryives. Copy ofthis order be cpi<<io<Tivi +ii<ioT^'i^^ ^Ri^i^ ^3lRl+i31T^'^T Moliaa Shrivastava, J. called for heariag, none appearcd for was passed over. Even m the second petitioner. Lawyer for the State/respondent. fhe nature of controversy mvolved is dismissed for waat of prosecution., ^ioner to revive ttie petition if fhe cause ^ent to the petitioner, Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Jude