HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR W.P. (S»No. 6851 pf 2007 PETITIONBR Sm.t. Sandhya Kesherwaai W/o Mr. C.L. Kesherwaai Aae about 45 years, Workmg as post ofAssistant Teacher, R/o H- 39 Nutan Colony Sarkanda Bilaspur, Distt- Bflaspur (C.G.) 2 State Govt. of (C.G.) & Through Secretary, Educational Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt- Raipur SC.G.) District Education Officer BUaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF TTHB CONSTITUTION OF ISDIA Shri Amit Kuinar Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Paael Lawyer for fhe State on advance copy. {17.11.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SSINHA, J Heard on adinission. Leamed coiuisel tbr the petinoner subiuits that the petitioner has passed D.Ed. examuiation on her own expenses, therefore, she is entiUed to receive two advance iucreineiits accordnig to circulars dated 24.12.1998 aiid 01.03.1999. He also submits that in many identical matters, fhe petitions have been ailowed in tenus of f&e order passed in the case of ¥ashwant Xumar ShttrctSwai Vs. Munldpai CorportMon, Dwg MtS^nother {2006 m MPJK-CG 96}. He subiaits fhat the case of fhe pefitioner is squarely covered by the said judgment. Ttus legal posiUon is not disputed by fhe leamed coiinsel for the State. However, he subnuts that the order inay be passed in W,P^IS)J<&i>851of2607 L terms of the said judginent, but it shall be subjected to verification regaaxliag petitioner's sucli qualification. Accordiagly, this writ petition is aUowed in terms of the order passed in case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to verification of the facts as to whether the petitioner had acquired D.Ed, Examiuation Certificate on her own expeuses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether she has been paid two advaace increiuents or not. The petition stauds finaUy disposed of. No order as to costs. J^_„ Sd/- SsiaiIKumarSinlia Judge vatti