^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR W.P. (St No. 6365 of 2007 PETITIQMERS 1 Vishram Siagh Gayakwad Age about 38 years, Asstt. Teacher S/o Shri Firenta Das Gayakwad, Primaiy School Maahora, Block Dharsiva, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 2 Nafhu Rata Chaadrakar Age about 54 years, Asstt. Teacher S/o Shri Mohar Singh Chaadrakar, Govt. Middle School Tekari, Block Arang, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) 3 Ashok Kumar Shanna, Age about 43 years, Asstt. Teacher S/o Shri Jagiuiath Shanaa, Govt. Primaiy School Baratiyabhatha, Block - Basxia, Distt.- Mahasamund (C.G.) Vcrsus 1 State Govt. of Chhattishgarh, Through Secretaiy, Tribal Welfare Department & Education Deparbnent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt,- Ralpur(C.G.) 2 District Education Of&cer, Mahasaiauiid/ Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) WMT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF RESPONDBNTS Appearance: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Rradeep Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State on advan.cc copy. ORALORraBR (31.10.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J Heard on aduussion. Learaed counsel for fhe petitioners subniits that fhe petitioners have passed B.T.I. examiaation on their own expenses, fherefore, fhey are entitled to receive two advaace iucreiaents accoiduig to circulara dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also subinits fhat m mauy identical matters, fhe petitions have been aUowed ia terms of fhe order passed in fhe case of Yashweint Kunwr Bhm'adwm' Vs. JHunicipal W.P.(S)No. 6365/2007 Cortwration. Dwa anel another {2006 (S SSPJR-CG 96}. He submits that the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the said judgmeat. This legal position is not disputed by the leamed counsel for the State. However, he subinits fhat fhe order inay be passed ia terms of the said judgment, but it shaU be subjected to verification regarding petitioaers' such quaBfication. Accordingly, fhis writ petition is allowed in terms of fhe order passed ia case of Yashwant Kuniar Bharadwaj Vs. MunidpaV Corporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to verification of fhe facts as to whefher fhe petitioners had acquired B.T.I. Examiuation Certificate on their own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 aad 01.03.1999 aad furfher whefher they Iiave been paid two advance iacreiaents or not. The petition staads finally disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti