9- .*- WMT PETmON CS) No.4660 of2008 : 1. Dinesh Kumar Chandrakar S/o Shri Kamlu Ram Chandrakar, Aged about 31 years, Working as Phannacist Grade-II (Class III) at Community Health Center Bhanpuratappur, R/o - Bhanupratappur, Distt. Kanker.-(C.G.) 2. Abhishek Kumar Shukla S/o Shri Durga Prasad Aged about 26 years, working as Grade - II, (Class III) at Pritnary Healfh Center Korar, R/o Tahsil - Saja Post Saja, RESPONDENTS' 3. Mukesh Kumar Ratre S/o Shri M.R.Ratre, Aged about 23 years Working as Pharmacist Grade H (Class III) at Primary Heatth Center Bhanbeda, RVo' Village Haradula, Tahsil Charaina, North. Bastar, Distt.Kanker(C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through its Secretary, Department of Health and Family WeSfare D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.O.) 2. Director, HeaMi Services, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Medicai and Health Qfficer, Kanker Distt. North Bastar, Distt. Kanker(C.G.) 4. Block Medical Oflicer, Cotnmunity Hea]th Center, . Bhaaupratapur, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) WRIT PETriTON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish 3K. Agmhotoi, J. Present: Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate for the petitionere. Shri Y.S.'niakur, Deputy Advocate General forthe State/respondents c •Ih •(Pa.ssedon27m dayof '£ m:\t ^s. WWl Leamed counsel appearina fbr the petitioners, on instructions, submits that th.e petitioners do not viant to press tfais on merit at tfais stage. However, tlie respondent-authorities may be directed to consider aad decide fhe pendins representation dated 21.05.2008 and 23.6.2008 (Annexure'y/4), in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. Shri Thakur, Dqiuty Advocate General for the State/respondents submits fhere is no reason asto why th.e representations of the petitioners, as * stated aboye should not'be considered expeditiously. Shri. Thakur submits ?--" -2- that the above-stated representation shall be considered and decided by the concemed aufhority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period oftwo weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. 3. In view ofthe clear statement made by leamed counsei appearmg for the State/respondents, accordi.ng to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners,nothing remains to be adjudicated. 4. Accordingly, tfae petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- :;,. SatishK.Agnatatn ^, Judge Aant ^s-