WPMS 884/2003 (Old No. 19781 of 2000) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard Sri M.S. Tyagi, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Sri H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no. 1 & 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is in possession of the land in dispute. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents states that the petitioner is a trespasser and he is liable to be evicted from the land in dispute. The matter is concluded by the finding of facts by the courts below. No interference is called for by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly. However, it is provided that the petitioner may file a suit under Section 229-B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act and get his title declared. If the suit for declaration of title is filed within three months from today, the same shall be decided within further three months and only till then, the petitioner shall not be dispossessed from the disputed land. (P.C.V., J.) 30.7.2008 Prabodh