IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21830 of 2011 Bibi Aklimun Nisha & Anr Versus Md.Asad & Ors ---------------------------------- 02. 13.12.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the plaintiffs- petitioners against the order dated 27.09.2011 passed by Sub Judge IV, Munger in Title Suit No.83 of 2000 whereby the learned Court below has allowed the amendment in written statement filed by the defendants-respondents. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that still today issues have not been framed. The learned counsel for the petitioners admitted this fact that many of the applications filed by the plaintiff and respondent are still pending and, therefore, issues could not be framed. The learned Court below found that the amendment sought for in the written statement is not going to change the nature of the suit and the amendment sought for is necessary for deciding the real controversy between the parties. The learned Court below also considering the delay in filing the amendment application awarded cost. In such view of the matter, the learned Court below has rightly exercised a jurisdiction vested in it by law and, therefore, there is no jurisdictional error as 2 such, the same cannot be interfered with in supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Thus, this writ application is dismissed. Saurabh (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)