1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.104 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.49 OF 2003 Narsimhan Raghunathan. ...Plaintiff. vs. Smt.Vatsala Srinivasan. ...Defendant --- Mr.Vinod Solanki, for Plaintiff. Mr.Kapil Gor, for Defendant in support. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. DATED: 20th July, 2006. P.C.:- The learned Counsel appearing for defendant who has taken out this notice of motion states that the defendant does not press any interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) and that the defendant is pressing interim order only in terms of prayer clause (c). The learned Counsel appearing for plaintiff has no objection to the grant of this notice of motion in terms of prayer clause (c). The notice of motion is granted, by consent of parties, in terms of prayer clause (c). Three weeks time is granted to comply with the order. Notice of motion is disposed of. 2 ---