a ^y^^l /- IN THE HON'BUB HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (Sl No. 4-3| /2010 PETITIONERS s>/ ..• V /.'y ^y ^7.€y ^'••^'^" .. ^' /" <<;• ..il l/ Ramesh Kumar Sao, S/o. late Shri Teejram Sao, aged 56 years, Occupation -Service presently posted as Draftsman, in P.M.G.Y. Circle, Bilaspur, R/o. Sarkanda, BIlaspur (C.G.) 2. R.P. Joshi, S/o, Shri Madhav Prasad, Joshi, aged 51 years, Occupation- Service, presently posted as Draftsman in the office of Executive Engineer P.M.G.S.Y. Division no. 1 Bilaspur (C.G.) 3.y S.P. Sharma, S/o. late Shri N.P. Sharma, Aged 54 years, Occupation Service, presently posted as Draftsman, in the office of C.G.R.R.D.A., Development Commissioner Raipur (C.G.) 4. S.K. Verma S/o. late Shri Shiyaram Verma; aged 51 years, Occupation- Service, presently posted as Draftsman in the office of R.E.S. Division, Abhanpur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1.^ State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, Mantranalaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) .^' 2. Development Commissioner, Panchayat and Rural Development Department Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS 10 -\1 :j \ :1^'.; iiji'^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WMT PETITION (S) No. 431 of2010 Ramesh Kumar Sao & Others. RESPONT)E 'S VERSUS State ofCHhattisearh & another. III;: WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTKUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AenihotrL J. Present: Shri I.S.Sahu, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy A.G. forthe State/respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 09th day of February, 2010) 1. Leame'd counsel appearmg tbr fhe State/respondents, on mstmctions, submits that it has been proposed to convene a meeting of the Departmental Promotion Committee to consider the promotion of the employees to the post of Assistant Engineer, Class II, in aecordance wifh law. 2. In view of the above submission, accordmg to leamed counsel appearing tbr the petitioners, nothing survives for adjudication at fhis stage. 3. Aecordingly, Ihe writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge