HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR W.P.IS] No. 7044 of 2007 ,if PBTITIOBER RESPONDENTS Narmada Prasad, Aged about 59 years, S/o Late Shri Ranglal, Up Van Chhestrapal, (Deputy Raage OfScer), Rauge Gelhapati, District Koria (C.G) Versus 1 State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secrctaiy, Forest Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 The Divisional Forest OiEcer, Baikuiithpur, Koria (C.G.) 3. Forest Raage Officer, Baikuuthpur, Distnct Koria (C.G.) (Writ Petition uader Article 226 ofthe Constitution oflndial Appearance: Shri D.N. Piajapati, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer, for the State on advan.ee copy. ORALORDER (26.11.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA^J. Heaid. Leamed cqunsel for the petitioner submits that fhe petitioner, who is workiag on fhe post of Deputy Range Officer at Gelhaparu has to retire on 31/7/2008 and at this atstge, by order dated 29/10/2007 (Annexure P/2), he has been attached as OfScer on Special Duty wifh Flying Squad, Baikimthpur. He submits fhat Baikunthpiir is at a distance of40 Kaa., fherefore, at fhis stage, it is difEcult for fhe petitioner to comply wifh the order. Needless to say that there does not appear aay ground to this Court to interfere with such order of attacltmeut. The petitioner inay face soine diGBcully by fhat order, but legatly it W.P.fS).No. 7Q4S of2007 cannot be iaterfered by a Court of law unless the order is vitiated by inalafides or is passed on extraueous consideratioas or is agauist aiiy statutoiy Rules or ftie Act. Learaed counsel for fhe petitioner could not pouit out a case of inala&de or extraneous considerations or that the order has been passed in violation ofaay statutory Riiles or the Act. In view of the above, I am not iucUned to iaterfere with fhe order oftransfer. The petition is disnussed at fhe niotion stage itself. However, lookmg to the circuinstance fhat the petitioner is to retire iu the Bionth of July 2008, he is iree to make representation before the concemed authorily. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Judge Shyna