^ BencU IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.} MISC. APPEAL N0. ^C -^zy OF 2006 APPELLANTS C.LAIMANTS m / s^ .^z «^" RESPONDENTS U Sunil Prasad, aged about 35 years, Son of Shri R. B. Prasad; }• ^ ^4. VERSUS / Ku. Apoorva Prasad, aged about 12 years D/o Shri Sunil Prasad; 3. Avinash Prasad, aged about 11 years, Son of Shri Sunil Prasad; Ku. Anjali Prasad, aged about 10 years D/o Shri Sunil Prasad; Appellant No.2 to 4 are Minor, through their natural guardian father Shri Sunil Prasad, resident of Near Matachoura Gali No.5, Kududand, Bilaspur, (C.G.). Sanjeev Kumar Sahu, aged about 34 years Son of Shri Chandrara, Sahu, Resident of Village Sankar, Akaltara, Police Station Akaltara, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). Dhananjay Sahu @ Sonu , aged about 23 years, Son of Shri Ram Sahu, Resident of Village Podi Dalha, Akaltara, Police Station Akaltara, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). ^- The New India Insurance Company Limited, through Branch Manager, U.T.I. Building, In front of Rajeev Plaza, Bus Stand, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OFTHE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT. 1988 ^FTcCT^TT^ ^wf T^iiqic)^, u>-al^<i<?, Rioi^yx J^.:^.'.^'..?.:.^:?.:.-2-.<0/.^?£^ © ^200 3TI^$T q3^ (»jc|ij6|«^) 3TT^$T<tn'f^:rt^ ^^TT3:iT^$T3?m^ ^Rnan^rf^r OT^^T ailo^ed 4/10/2006 Shri P,P, Sahu,Advocate| Heard on I.A. No. 3018/p lo.eino of appeal. The apptication is aBiendiiient ui tlie Court durmb Heai'd on admission. The uistaiit appeal is 2006 passed by tlie. First Motof Claim Case No. 103/2006 allowiiig tlie appticatiou under[ has awarded a SUBI of Rs. 50,| death of Rajkiimari- wife of appeUaiits No. 2 to 4, aiid disuibuted equaUy amoiigst direction tliat fhe amount miiior children ofthe appeUaat| deposit for fhe period till tliey Leained counsel for tlij direction is coiitraiT to the Act as tlie provision for uiterio|i in Uie Act to fumll tlie imBied|i< deceased, He furfher submits reqziired by the appellajit No, for ftie appellaats. 3018/12006, an appUcation for axsienduig the <ni<<fo<Tlvi WT^f ^"f^cft ^PJI^-CI^ ^3rf^T3n^5T >^ed. Tlie appellaiits to cairy out the me Couse of me day, dfrected agaiiist the order dated 16-6- Accideut Claiois Tribunal, Bilaspur iii ^hercby tiie iearned Claims Tribunal Section 140 offhe Motor Vehicles Act ,p00/- as Hiterim compensation for tlie tlie appeUajit No. 1 aad mother of clirected tliat fhe aBiount is to be |tlie appellants. However/ Uiere is a to fhe appellaiits No. 2 to 4- tlie No. 1, shaU be deposited iii fixed term IttaiD. niaprity. appellaiits submits tliat the above of Sectioa 140 of the Motor Vehicles compensation has beeii iricorporated requireiDient of dependants of fhe Uiat Uie amiount of iiiterim awaixl is |I for fhe pui^oses of meetuig out fhe fartlier pay|abie spiiTit -edlate SP/FS/2005-20,000 *ii*ic»ia?'n^ ^3:5£T'^IHIri^,u»rTl^<ic,Rirti<<-l^x FQ.'.^:.^;?:..^?.;.?.^./?.(^ ^ ^200 3T^$T q?q? (yii^qcg) OPT^^Tcprf^Rt^ JCT^ST^^ T' f/ iT^TW;^f^ 3TT^$T expenses uicurred by him for also tlie funeral expenses of th after takuig loans froin private Takiiig uito consideration| aiid after eonsideruig fhat the ri been made to meet out the iairdLC of the deceased, me iBipugned) where it has been du'ected tlicl shall be deposited in fixed fei-^i ai'e allowed to withdraw the am<i The appeal is accorduigly| iairdLediate <Pl^fo<iTlT1 +1MCoT^?rSL^l ^Fjt^-CI^ ^3lf^T3II^?T :he pui'poses of last rite cereBiony as deceased as tlie same was uicuiTed »ersons. the grounds nientioned in tliis appeal rovision for uiteriBi compensation has recjuirement of tlie dependents order is modt&ed to the extent tliat .t the amount payable to the miiiors 1 deposit is set aside, The appeIlaiTts >uiit of iiiteiim conipensation, disposed of, Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge SP/FS/2005-20,000 w^ 1--1