C ? (a? 7f @V’u, ‘ N QQw IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR_(C.G.) WRIT PETITI0N (S) No. (:8% 12008 s.B. PETlTl0NER : Vimal Kumar Sharma S/o Late /Shri T.B. Sharma, aged abdut \fc M /60 years, occupation Service, (kg/k V8 \2 Head Master, M.L.B. Middle ....... § \\ school Jogdalpur Distt. Bastar l (0.6.) VERSUS TS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Schedule Tribe and Schedule Cast development department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Jagdalpur Distt. Bastar (C.G.) 3. The Commissioner, Schedule Tribe and schedule caste Development, Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Block Education Officer, Jagdalpur Distt. Bastar (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE ' ACONSTITUTION OF INDIA % g‘ ‘ RESPONDEN HEGH CSURT OF CHHNFEESGH A? EELASPUR (Ham Mr, Justice Pfitinker EJiwaker) WrEt 96mm?! (S) Na. 6826 of 266% (q? PETETRONER Vimal Kumar Sharma‘ VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhatt§sgarh and others. Shri Mano} Mishra counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur Dy. AG for the respondents/State. WRET PETI'HON UNDER ART!CLE 226 OF THE CONSTH'UTION OF INDIA ORDER waomoos) finatty. With the consent of the counsei for the parties, the matter is heard Chailenge in the instant petition is to the order dated 7.7.2008 (Annexure P-9) passed by respondent No.1 whereby the petitioner was transferred from MLB G’iris’ School, Jagdaipur, District Bastar to Government Middie Schooi, Banda, District Dantewada, in viotation of the transfer policy. This petition was fiied on 3.122008 and the stay was granted in favour of the petitioner vide order dated 6.1 1 .2008. Contention of the oounsei for the parties is that this Court may quash the impugned transfer order by giving liberty to the respondents to pass fresh order if administrative exigency so warrants. ln view of the submissions of the counsel for the respective parties and looking to the fact that the petition was med on 3.12.2008 and stay was granted in favour of the petitioner vide order dated 6.11.2008, the impugned order dated 17.2008 so far as it relates to the petitioner is hereby quashed. However, the respondents shall be free to pass the order afresh if administrative exigency necessitates the same. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands dispos/edof, /