IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12039 of 2007 MAHNAZ NASEER, D/O PROF. DR. MD. NASEERUDDIN, R/O MOHALLA-JABBAR CHAK, P.O. AND P.S.-TATARPUR, DISTRICT-BHAGALPUR. ………………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SAHARSA. 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SAHARSA. 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, SIMRI BAKHTIYARPUR, SAHARSA. 7. THE CHAIRMAN, SELECTION COMMITTEE OF PRIMARY TEACHER GRAM PANCHAYAT SITANBAD (SOUTH) P.S.- SIMRI BAKHTIYARPUR, DISTRICT-SAHARSA. 8. MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT SITNABAD (SOUTH) SIMRI BAKHTIYARPUR, DISTRICT-SAHARSA. 9. THE PANCHAYAT SEWAK, GRAM PANCHAYAT, SITNABAD (SOUTH) P.S.-SIMRI BAKHTIYARPUR, DISTRICT- SAHARSA. …………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 29.06.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State inform this Court that now the Tribunals constituted by the State Government under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Prarambhik Shikshak (Niyojan Avam Seva Sart) Niyamvali, 2006 are functional and are now efficacious alternative forums available to the petitioner and others for consideration of their grievances. In view of the submissions of the learned counsels and in view of the availability of the effective alternative forum, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application - 2 - before the concerned Tribunal for redressal of her grievance. In case such an application is filed by the petitioner, the Tribunal shall make all endeavours to dispose of the same on its own merits by a speaking order preferably within three months from the date of filing of the application. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioner. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)