1 L.P.A.No. of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.153 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.11316 OF 2010 The Child Development Project Officer and anr. ..APPELLANTS VERSUS Smt. Vandana Bhaskar Patil ..RESPONDENT Mr D.S. Bagul, Advocate for the appellants; Mr R.S. Shinde, Advocate for the respondent CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE AND S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 8th April, 2011 PER COURT : The Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred against the order of the learned Single Judge, which has confirmed the order passed by the Labour Court as well as the Industrial Court. The Labour Court had directed the appellant to either reinstate the respondent or to pay her 75% of her salary each month till the decision in the complaint. In our opinion, there is no need to interfere with the order. It is an interim order passed 2 L.P.A.No. of 2010 by the Labour Court, which has been confirmed by the Industrial Court and the learned Single Judge. There are no jurisdictional errors requiring us to interfere with the same. Letters Patent Appeal rejected. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) ( SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) amj/lpa153.11