IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 18664 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.9.2011 Sanjeev Kumar .. Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. R. N. Lohan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Goripuria, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that all other similarly situated co-accused in this FIR have already been directed to be released on bail by this court vide order dated 3.6.2011, passed in Criminal Misc.-M No. 14052 of 2011 –Dr. Vishal Goyal v. State of Haryana and connected petitions. The petitioner was also taken into custody at the same time, i.e., 23.2.2011. In fact, there was no tampering or manipulation of the injuries, as is alleged in the FIR. Learned counsel for the State did not dispute the fact that other co-accused similarly situated in the FIR have been enlarged on bail. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, in my opinion, the petitioner also deserves concession of bail pending trial. He is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Hissar. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 21.9.2011 mk