1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2864 OF 2004 Prakash H. Dugad ... Petitioner fcVs. Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. N.R. Bubna for Petitioner. Ms. Trupti Puranik for Respondents. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: OCTOBER 12, 2006 DATED: OCTOBER 12, 2006 DATED: OCTOBER 12, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . It is the case of the Petitioner that Respondent No. 7 has carried out illegal construction and Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 have failed to take action. Considering the controversy, we direct Respondent No. 3 or if he is not the competent officer, the competent officer to examine the complaint made by the Petitioner and after hearing the Petitioner and Respondent No. 7 to pass appropriate orders according to law. The entire action to be completed within 12 weeks from today. With the above observation, petition stands disposed of. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)