IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32452 of 2009 1. SAROJ KUMARI @ SAROJ DEVI 2. RAJ BALLAM PRASAD YADAV----PETITIONERS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . 2 6.11.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing for the State. Petitioner no.1 is the second wife of the husband of the complainant and petitioner no.2 is the father of petitioner no.1. Both the petitioners are apprehending their arrest in complaint case no.1244 of 2005 for offence instituted under sections 498A 323,379 and 494 of the Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioners submits that marriage of petitioner no.1 with the husband of the petitioners’ complainant was solemnized in the year 1985 with the consent of the family. Now after so many years she has filed complaint case for some other motive. So far torture or anything is concerned, petitioners have no concern with the same. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners above named is allowed. Let the petitioners above named surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each - 2 - with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in complaint case no. 1244 of 2005 ( Trial No. 2012 of 2008), subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mridula Mishra,J) A.Kumar