IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19684 of 2010 SUBODH RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 25.06.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 364A, 366A and other provisions of the Penal Code is that the FIR itself states that the informant willingly allowed the girl to go. Medically she was assessed to be 15 – 16 years of age and has married the petitioner. There was a delay of one month in filing of the complaint case sent for investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Considered the age of discretion which the alleged victim is alleged to have reached, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Muzaffarpur in Hathauri PS Case No. 9 of 2010. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)