FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders CRI. APPLN/3790/2009 In REVNST/296/2009 THE STATE OF MAH VERSUS YADAVRAO SAINAJI GHANSAVANT AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.V.Wagh APP Mr. Jagatkar Amol Anantrao Adv For Respdt 1 To 5 ... CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. Dated: July 12, 2011 ... 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This is an application preferred by the application-state for condonation of 46 days delay caused in filing accompanying criminal revision application. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent opposed present application vehemently and submitted that it bears no substance, same is devoid of any merits and therefore it be rejected. 4. Considering the reasons mentioned in the application and also considering the rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for respective parties, it appears that applicant has explained delay satisfactorily. It also appears that said delay is not intentional, wilful and deliberate and therefore same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders 5. In the result present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and delay of 46 days caused in filing accompanying criminal revision application stands condoned and Criminal Revision Application be registered and numbered and present application stands disposed of accordingly. ( SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. ) aaa/3790 *****