IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2926 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 2926 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 2926 OF 2006 Anil Jagannath Nevalkar ... Petitioner V/s. SRA & Ors. ... Respondents None for the petitioners. Mr. G.D. Utangale for respondent No.1. Mr. P.G. Sawant for respondent No. 5. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 21st December, 2006 : 21st December, 2006 : 21st December, 2006 P.C. . None present for the petitioner. There is a scheme framed under SRA Scheme. The petitioner claims that his name should be included in the scheme. It appears that the petitioner has not applied for inclusion of his name. Under the circumstances, if the petitioner applies to the Competent Authorty, in the instant case, the respondent No. 2 to consider the same and dispose it of at any rate not later than twelve weeks from the receipt of the application. 2. With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]