51 HI6H COURT OF CHHATTESSARH AT KTLASPUR Writ Petition No- 815 of 2001 Peti+ioner Respondents Versus 1. 2. Uttam Chand Baid. 5/o Late Shr's Laxmi Lc! Baid, Aged 61 years, R/o Pension Bada, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) 5'1'ate of ChhnttisgsFh. Through: 5ecrstary- Ministry of Self Administration Deptt. &ovt. of Chhottisauh, Raipur Comn'.issjonet', AAunicipa! Corporution, Motviya Road, Raipur WRIT PETTTOIN UN&ER ARTECLE 226/227 OF THE CPNSTTTUTIQN OT INDIA Sirgie Banch : Hon'bie Mr. SatishK. Agmho'tri. J. 5hri N. K. Vyas, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri Ajoy bwivedi. Eieputy Sovt. Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Shci Kashif ^-iskeel, Advocal-e for the respondent No. 2. ORAL ORDER (Passedon this 30th day of June, 2008) Learned cowise! oppearina for the petitioner submits •thot tha »<e^iy*a| b&nsfifs cf ths pfftitionsr wer's Sus QR 31 August, 2000. The same were puid ufter a penod of one yesr and two mon'ths- Thus, the petitioner is entitled to interest on the deiayed pay-n>ent 1- 3. uf the amount. Lesmec! counse! appearing for the r-e^iondent No.2/Municipsl Corporotion ajbmits, i+ appears thot the petitioner hos not vacated the officia! accorriiriodation. aiiotted to him. Be that as it may. os requested by ieamed counset appeoring foi- the petitioner, the petitiorier is granted !iberty to make u repr-esentation to the concerned authorfty for- oppropriste reiief- Tn the event, such u represeritution is made by the petitioner, the same shull be considered and decided, on its own ineri't's, in ^s-y^^ ..'.r^ 3 $ 4- accor-dance u>ith laui, as early os possible, preferabiy ufi-thin u per-iod of four weeks from the dcte of receipt of the representation. Wil+i the above observation. this petition a+ands disposed of- costs. ____ _ No Tliafcur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge