IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5427 of 2010 1.THARU MALLIK 2.JAYSHREE MALLIK Versus STATE OF BIHAR -- -----a---- 2 23.2.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 302 and 201/34 of the I.P.C. Taking into consideration the fact that there is no eye witness to the occurrence and the entire case against the petitioners is based merely on suspicion having been cast against them by the informant, let the petitioners, above named, who are in custody since 10.4.2009 having no criminal antecedent be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 9th Addl. Sessions Judge, Purvi Champaran, Motihari, in Sessions Tr.No.476/09 arising out of Kottwa P.S. Case No.52/09 subject to the conditions that (a) one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioners, (c) the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and, if they are, they shall not be released on bail and (c) the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they failed to do so on two given dates and 2 delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. AnilKr.Sinha (Anjana Prakash,J.)