IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.15764 of 2011 Binay Sah @ Binay Kumar Sah, S/o Krishna Sah. Versus The State of Bihar ------------------ 04. 20.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and later on Sections 395 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code was added. The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 21.09.2010 since he had been arrested seated on the looted tractor. I am not inclined to review the earlier order. The prayer for bail is once again rejected. It appears that the case was not committed earlier on account of the fact that the petitioner was not being produced from jail custody. In view of such, now that the Trial Court is in seisin of the case it is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it positively within a period of one year. For this reason, the Trial Court is directed to send a list of witnesses fixing specific dates to the S.P. concerned along with the copy of this order who will ensure the attendance of the witnesses on the said dates so that there is no further delay in trial. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)