{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12559 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1975 OF 1995 Anil Wamanrao Vispute & Another APPLICANTS VERSUS Sanjay Gabaji Sonar and others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.P.R.Patil, Advocate for applicants Mr.N.N.Jadhav, AGP for state Mr.P.S.Dighe h/f Mr.N.B.Suryawanshi for original petitioners. Mr.Y.P.Patil, Advocate for respondent No.6 Mr.A.S.Shelke, Advocate for respondent No.15 ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, and A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 29th September 2009 PER COURT: 1. This is an application by which the applicants seek modification of the interim order passed by this Court on 24.04.1995. 2. It appears that writ petition No.1975/1995 came to be filed in this Court on 13.04.1995 seeking the relief of directing the respondents to conduct a detailed inquiry in respect of certain {2} bogus NA permissions granted in the year 1984, by the Tahsildar, which were mentioned at Chart Exhibit-E, for converting NA use of the lands mentioned in the said chart which were canceled by the Collector Jalgaon. The petitioner has also prayed for quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 13th / 15th March 1995 passed by respondent No.23 and respondent No.2. Certain ad interim / interim reliefs were prayed vide prayer clause “D” to the petition i.e. for staying operation and execution of the impugned order dated 13th / 15th March 1995 and by amending the prayer clause, vide prayer clause “DD” for granting an injunction restraining respondents No.5 to 22, their servants, agents, power of attorney holders, from alienating, dealing with in any manner, transferring, seeking permission from any competent authority for changing nature of the lands in dispute, pending the hearing and final disposal of the present petition. 3. The present applicants, by the order passed by us in Civil Application No.9742/2009, are permitted to intervene in the petition. Accordingly, we deal with this application filed by the applicants seeking modification of the aforesaid order. According to the applicants, certain bogus NA permissions are subject matter of challenge in the present petition. The applicants had purchased an agricultural land by a registered sale deed, copy of which is tendered along with the civil application No.9742/2009. The applicants purchased the aforesaid agricultural land on 16.01.1994. According to the applicants, the aforesaid land fell to {3} the share of the sons of the original owner, by virtue of partition, on 09.03.1989. Thereafter, the present writ petition came to be filed on 13.04.1995. According to the applicants, on account of pendency of this petition and the fact that the entire revenue record has been tendered in this Court, the application of the applicants, seeking mutation of their names, is not entered by the revenue authorities. 4. We have heard learned counsel of the parties. According to us, since the applicants had purchased an agricultural land and there is no reference, whatsoever, to any NA permission, the present interim order does not cover the transaction entered into by the applicants on 10.01.1994. However, we direct the applicants not to change the user of the land from agricultural to Non Agriculture, without leave of this Court. In any event, since the interim relief does not cover the case of the present applicants, we allow this application and direct the revenue authorities to deal with application of the applicants for mutation of their names, pursuant to the sale transaction dated 10.01.1994 on its own merits, uninfluenced by the interim orders passed by this Court. Civil Application allowed to the extent indicated above with no order as to costs. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/ca12559-09