IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1624 of 2006 Date of decision: 30th October, 2008 Sanjiv Jain … Petitioner Versus Vanita Jain and others … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Sunil Chadha, Advocate for the petitioner. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) On 2nd December, 2005, Rent Controller opined that the rate of rent claimed by the landlord is admitted by the tenant but the tenant had made a claim that Rs.3,000/- per month was to be adjusted against the loan given by the tenant to the landlord. Taking into consideration the controversy involved, while assessing the provisional rent, Rent Controller ordered that the tenant should make a payment of admitted rent along with house tax, interest and costs. This order was passed on 2nd December, 2005. By afflux of time, main petition may have concluded. Otherwise also, the impugned order is only regrinding assessment of the provisional rent. This order is interim in nature and is interlocutory. Parties will get fair opportunity for determination of the rent. Therefore, I find no infirmity in the orders passed by the Rent Controller. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE October 30, 2008 rps