IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 22ND MARCH 2007 / 1ST CHAITHRA 1929 CRP.No. 1962 OF 2001(F) ----------------------- RCA.6/1998 OF THE RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY, PARAVUR RCP.7/1996 OF THE RENT CONTROL COURT, PARAVUR .................... REVN. PETITIONE/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------------------------------------- BABU, S/O. NARAYANAN, AGED 37 YEARS, MARAMUTTATH, KUZHUPPILLY KARA, KUZHUPPILLY VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.B.RAMACHANDRAN SRI.L.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: ---------------------------------------------------------------- ANNIE, W/O. VARGHESE, MALIYAKKAL, KUZHUPPILLY KARA, KUZHUPPILLY VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K) SRI.SUJESH MENON V.B. THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CRP NO. 1962/2001 ORDER ON CMP NO. 4243/2001 IN C.R.P. 1962/2001 // DISMISSED // 22.3.2007. SD/- P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE. SD/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. // TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE. knc/- P.R. RAMAN & ANTONY DOMINIC, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = == == = = = = C.R.P. NO. 1962 OF 2001 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH, 2007. O R D E R Raman, J. Tenant is the revision petitioner. he was ordered to be evicted by the Rent Control Court as affirmed by the appellate authority under Section 11 (3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act. It is against the said order that the present revision is filed. 2. There were three other tenants and the Rent Control proceedings were disposed of by a common order and the appeals therefrom were also disposed of by a common judgment. The three other civil revision petitions were also disposed of by this Court by a common order dated 21.12.2005 and remanded the cases to the Rent Control Court, North Paravur. In such circumstances, the order passed by the Rent Control Court, as affirmed by the appellate authority is set aside and following the order passed in the connected civil revision petitions, this revision petition is allowed by way of remand to be considered and disposed of along with the other connected cases. We make it clear that the remand itself is limited for consideration of the issue in terms of the common order dated 21.12.2005 in the civil revision petitions. P.R. RAMAN, (JUDGE) ANTONY DOMINIC, (JUDGE) knc/- P.R. RAMAN & ANTONY DOMINIC, JJ. ==================== C.R.P. NO. 1962/2001 ================= O R D E R DATED: 22ND MARCH, 2007.