CRM-M No.2989 of 2011 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CRM-M No.2989 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.02.2011 Jagjit Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Bhavna Gupta, D.A.G., Punjab for the State. ... Alok Singh, J (Oral). This is an application seeking regular bail in case FIR No.50 dated 15.10.2010 under Sections 324/326/307/34 IPC, P.S. Begowal, District Kapurthala. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that no injury on the body of the injured is attributed to the petitioner. Learned counsel has further argued that petitioner is the owner of the car which was hired by the accused. Learned counsel has further argued that only because CRM-M No.2989 of 2011 2 his car was hired by the accused without knowledge of the petitioner that accused are going to commit crime, shall not make the petitioner member of the unlawful assembly or cannot be said to have common intention with the other co-accused to commit crime. Perusal of the record reveals that the FIR was against unknown persons and the petitioner was roped in because his car was used in the crime. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to be released on bail to the satisfaction of the CJM/Duty Magistrate, Kapurthala. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 28.02.2011 sk.