1 wp1515-11.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1515 OF 2011 Smt.Asha Janardan Chaskar .. Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & ors. .. Respondents Mr.A.S.Patil for petitioner Mr.B.V.Phadnis i/b. G.D.Utangale for respondent No.5 Ms.M.Kajale AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 26th September 2011. P.C.: 1] The petitioner and respondents and particularly the contesting respondent No.4 have settled the dispute, inasmuch as, although the petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the Authorities in forcibly evicting him from the existing premises, now an agreement has been reached between parties that the petitioner shall be accommodated not in the rehabilitation component but in the saleable portion of the redevelopment scheme. Herein, the petitioner will be provided the permanent accommodation of the specifications and the area specified in 2 wp1515-11.doc the consent terms. It is stated that these terms do not in any manner disturb the implementation of the slum rehabilitation scheme or affects any rights of eligible slum dweller or third party. 2] In the light of the statement made and the petitioner who has signed the terms in Marathi language having been explained all the consequences which flow from these terms and the obligations that may arise; his signature below the term having been confirmed, the consent terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. There will be an order in terms of consent terms. Petition disposed of accordingly. No costs. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)