@‘@ BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATI’ISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION No. (Z3 200 PETITIONER /’M/s S.L. Goyal, through — Power of Attorney Holder, Vivek Mishra, \ ‘1‘“WWH Og Ison of Shri S.K. Mishra, °f aged about VERSUS RESPONDTS //1. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, EN x /Managing New Delhl Igirector through A-601:, Statesman Its Chief House Barakhambha Road, Deihi. ' 2. ‘The Chief General Manager, Telecom, Chhattisgarh Telecom Circle, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Near Secretariate, G.E. Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. The General Manager, Teiecom / Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Biiaspur, (Bilaspuir Telecom District) Link Road, City Telephone Exchange, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) The Divisional %%'(Planning) ‘1 Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Bilaspur (CG) _/5r. The Sub Divisional Engineer (Telegraph) Bharat Sanchar Nigam GMTD, Limited, BHaspur (Chhattisgarh) x3 h The Sub Divisional Engineer, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Pendra Road, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ‘ XI-HC 78 @ Shri Pratask Shanna. couils Shri V.V.S, Murthv, Staluiin This petition pemamss to m the work by the petitionér as per o €101; being maae to 11in1v Learned counsel for Th6 rapr€$€ntati0n$ havg b13511 mack. 1 but E10 angwm‘ is bang givcn in getitioner hag KeETt with 11o iem€ petitimx Counsel furfhsr submii respondents concenied may fqJrCSSntations 0f the. pE‘iitionEr ax Havmg him‘d Emmi c0113 mgard to the factS and cjltiumstar are (iiriscted to consider the repl and after considering all thc §3oi days Withili a pe‘riec‘i of thirtvZm accord if this Said mnmsmltations am not Th6 13€fition6r mm Em the: copiiis the regmndents Within a period of Consaqusntly, MW? N0. 10 difsoosaii oi: Corfjiiod copy a$ per Hues. 31 for the petitioxiar. g counsel for tho mopondouts. 3 issue that even aftar exocotion of fderg of Ihe 1 .‘s‘pomiemg’ @aymem iS wetitioner submits that saaveral o i116. msponéoutS by tho igotitionor mas or no ‘LW mom, thorafora, m6 :{y and pei‘ibi‘ce. ha? has; mod ihis s that m the given situax‘ion. inf: be aiirected to conSider the Ld pase appropriate order. 1se1 for The Detitioner 311d haviug ce of i116 case, menomient V03 (S ‘ eeentatione mac‘te 13v the 13etitioner 1ts raised by him decide the Same I ance with Eaw. it io made dear that avajia'bie with the reepondeme then of the er-ifiier repyeeema‘tions befote tell daV$L ‘1c1s c‘iispoeed of. With the aforesaid, the pefitipa s §/05, 28-8,“)5 fix: 289i§5 aleo stand Sdl- L.-C. Bhadoo Judge Wm.l..l. W 206 Wmw WWW mm (WW) Wmm WWW£1¢§ém é; aim W §‘?.1J3‘C¥35