IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.279 of 2011 KAPILDEO SHARMA , SON OF LATE GANGA SINGH, R/O VILLAGE- PARORIA, P.S. MUFASSIL, DIST- GAYA..APPELLANT. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, PANCHAYATI RAJ DIRECTORATE, GOVT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 4. ZILA PARISHAD, GAYA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN 5. THE CHAIRMAN, ZILA PARISHAD, GAYA 6. THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER-CUM-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILA PARISHAD, GAYA.. RESPONDENT ----------- 4 11-5-2011 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the order of the writ court. The relevant part of the order impugned before the writ court discusses the relevant provisions in Rule 103 of the Bihar Service Code and the same has been considered by the writ court and it has found no error in the impugned order. An attempt was made on behalf of the appellant to take us into controversies of facts as to whether the appellant had worked on both the posts i.e. the post of Assistant Engineer and higher post of District Engineer in the Zila Prishad, Gaya as claimed by him or he has worked only on the higher post of District Engineer as mentioned in the order impugned before the writ court. The very claim for higher officiating pay has been raised after retirement and is not 2 supported by any order of the concerned authority which may entitle him for higher pay. In that view of the matter, we find no merit in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)