1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.174/2004. Nathu Lal. VERSUS Chail Bihari & Others. 09.05.2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Sudesh Bansal, for the petitioner. Mr.Amit Jindal, for the respondents. ***** Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment dated 03.09.2004 by which the learned trial court has dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff-petitioner under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The learned court below having gone through the evidence on record has given clear findings by which it has been held that the plaintiff-petitioner has not been able to prove the fact of his dispossession, as alleged. In the facts and circumstances, these being findings of fact, the same cannot be interfered with in revision. The learned court below has also found that the shop in question belongs to the Kameshwar Mahadev Trust and since the said Trust itself was not a party, the suit was liable to be dismissed. In the facts and circumstances, I find no good ground to interfere with the impugned judgment which does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. Consequently, the revision petition as well as the stay application stand dismissed summarily. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.