BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.14985 of 2011 1 MURUGAN @ VALLANADU MURUGAN 2 S.RAMACHANDRAN 3 VALLINAYAGAM ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 16, 14 AND 15 Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE C.C.B.POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DIST IN CR. NO. 54 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.BALAKARTHICK Advocate For Respondent : MR. K.S. DURAIPANDIAN,ADDITIONAL PUBLIC POROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 120(b), 419, 465, 467, 469, 471 and 420 of I.P.C, in Crime Number 54 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners have been ranked as A-16, A-14 and A-15 respectively in this case. He would further submit in his argument that on the basis of the confession given by one of the co-accused viz.,one Muthuvelan, these petitioners have been implicated in this case. He would further submit that co-accused in this case have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. In that aspect, the petitioners are also entitled for anticipatory bail. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the petitioners are ranked as A-14, A15 and A-16 in this case. He would also submit that some of the co-accused were already https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ granted anticipatory bail by this Court. If for any reasons, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, suitable conditions may be imposed. 5.Considering the submissions made by both sides, I could see that in this case, co-accused persons, who are standing in the similar footing as that of these accused were already granted anticipatory bail by this Court. Under the said circumstances, I am of the view that the petitioners are also entitled for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with the following conditions: i)Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.I, Tirunelveli and on each executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further condition, ii)that the first petitioner/A-16 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required and the petitioners 2 and 3/A- 14 and A-15 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. iii)The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. iv)The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 19/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, TIRUNELVELI 2 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI 3 THE ADDL.PUBNLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,C.C.B.POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DIST 1. CC to M/S. S.BALAKARTHICK Advocate SR.No.44515: DM::2011:DECEMBER:21:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14985 of 2011 Date :19/12/2011 2P:6C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/