IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DECEMBER 2010 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 35469 of 2010(G) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- TREESA MOHANAN @ LILLY, AGED 60 YEARS, W/O.MOHANAN, HOUSE NO.1/1081, (1/934), ODATHAPARAMBU, FORT KOCHI, PIN-682 001. BY ADV. SRI.SHAJI P.CHALY, SRI.S.GOPAKUMAR, SRI.R.SANJITH. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. KOCHI TALUK LEGAL SERVICE COMMITTEE, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, KOCHI COURT COMPLEX, PYARY JN., THOPPUMPADY, ERNAKULAM-682 005. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, KOCHI TALUK, FORT KOCHI, ERNAKULAM-682 001. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, FORTKOCHI VILLAGE, FORTKOCHI, ERNAKULAM-682 001. 4. ALEXANDER, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O.LATE SIMON VINCENT, HOUSE NO.1/1081, (1/934), ODATHAPARAMBU, FORT KOCHI, PIN-682 001. 5. MARY JOSHY, AGED 46 YEARS, W/O.E.P. JOSHY, ELANJIKKAL HOUSE, NORTH THAMARAPARAMBU, FORTKOCHI, PIN-682 001. R2 & R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.P. NARAYANAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 35469 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 8th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner's allegation is that though her mother had executed gift deed bearing No.673/93 of SRO, Kochi, bequeathing 5.25 cents of property situated in Sy.No.259/1 of Fortkochi Village and a residential building thereof in favour of the party respondents, when they made application for mutating the property in their favour, orders were not passed by respondents 2 and 3. It is stated that thereupon in a petition filed by respondents 4 and 5, 1st respondent issued directions to respondents 2 and 3 to effect mutation and report compliance. This, according to the petitioner was illegal and with these allegations, this writ petition was filed. 2. Learned Government Pleader has obtained instructions from the 1st respondent. According to the learned Government Pleader, no direction, either oral or in writing, in relation to the mutation of the property belonging to respondents 4 and 5 has been issued by the 1st respondent. Now that such a submission has been made by the learned WPC No. 35469/10 :2 : Government Pleader and as the petitioner has not produced anything to disbelieve the said assertion, I need only record the submission made by the learned Government Pleader and close the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp