IN THE HIGH COURT OF 3VT>ICKIVKE AT BIL^^PVR (C.O.) W.P.NO. -c:t/3 of 2003 PETITIONER /<. ^'..' y^ <.-<^>' /< ^•'n^. <V/-J.4<*"7..1 s^<y-''^' ^ey <^c^' <<^2I <S<>'.J iN^ Jt' •vff^^^ y t Nandti Sinha S/o. Ramcharan Sinha aged about 55 years, Occupation - , Agruculture, Resident g£ Village • •' Belgaon, Tah - Oongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (c.G.) VERSUS 1. sarpanch, Village ~ Panchayat Belgaon, Tah. - Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C»G.) 2. GoMnd Kanwar, Sarpanch, aged about 52 years, Village - Panchayat Belgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3. Hukumchand Agrawal, S/o. Raneshwar Lal Agrawal, aged about 49 years, Resident o£ State Bank Road, Dongargarh. 4. Dumar- Kanwar. S/o. Latul Kanwar, aged about 34 years. 5. Panchu Teli, S/o. Phagua Ram, aged about 34 years. 6. Dhanuk Kanwar, S/o. Vinod Kanwar aged about 60 years. 7. Bheemsham Sinha, S/o. Halalkhar •aged about 32 years. S« Chhabil Sahu, S/o. Gend Sahu, aged about 35 years. 9. prakash Agrawal, S/o. seeta Ram aged about 34 years. 10. Raghu Nandayi S/o. Ramkishan Kanwar aged about 34 years. 11. Prahlad, s/o. Dhanuk Kanwar, aged about 32 yrs. No.4 to ijk all resi- dent of Vill. Belgaon, P.O.Jatkan- dar, Tah. & Resi. o£ Dongargarh, 2 t Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION .]FOR.I_SSUANCE .0_F_WRIT_IN THE NATURE_ OP CERTIORARI UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 'XI-HC-22 -h 'S^ -'ll^lcf'f, y^l'M'IS, facll'Hy 311^1 ^F K;-ii?h 31T^T ^ l •^f^cf W'!-' Mmwi fbwastO.|f5Af0.5^3/2<70^ r-m, SII^T^clRTC^lfOT i7.05.2003 Sm.t. Haiiiida Siddiqui, cc Shri Rpj.ibir Singh, Govt. Heai-d. : This petitlon under Artld of India has been filed bv t] impugned. order dated 27.1.2 rejected the application liled b| order dated 26.10-2002 i Having considered the fi (unsel for the petitioner. Advocate, for the Stafe. 226/227 ofthe Constltutlon lie petitioner chaUenging the 1003 whereby the trial Court ^ the plaintiff for recaUing the ui casc aiid inatcrial on rccord, i| case tor 'exercislng extra-ordin^ ou^ in view of the discretion e^ passing the unpugned order. ralse ttie questlons m appeal| arises. With the aioresaid obsel disposed of. M.W.P, No- 460/2003 sta|nds clisposed OT C^rtified copy as per rule| <fti<il<d<fli *im<r« ^t fa.^ <f^'^i< iT3lPgi[3l^T Lcts and cu'crinistances of fhe '\. hi thc opinion of this Court, no try jurisdiction has been made iercised bv the Coi.u't below in However, the petitioner niav in case such an pventi.iaUt.y •vations, t.his writ petition is [^i^^,^^