SRK １ wp-1762-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1762 OF 2010 Sadashiv Sharu Shrilimaye ... Petitioner Versus Mahesh Datar and others. ... Respondents Petitioner in person. Mr. M.D. Naik, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.3 and 5. Mr. Nitin Jamdar for respondent No.4. CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. Monday, October 4, 2010 P .C. The learned counsel for Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa places on record a copy of the communication dated 17th September, 2010 informing the petitioner that Bar Council has despatched the Sanad and the Identity Card with a covering letter on 24th August, 2010 but the same was received back undelivered with the postal remark "incomplete address, not known". 2. The learned counsel for Bar Council states that thereafter, the petitioner collected the Sanad and Identity card on 20th September, 2010. 3. The petitioner admits that he has received the Sanad and the Identity Card on 20th September, 2010. Hence, nothing further survives in this petition and the petitioner is, therefore, disposed of. SRK ２ wp-1762-10 4. As regards the petitioner's prayer for compensation for the delay caused in issuing Sanad in favour of the petitioner, the learned counsel for the Bar Council points out that the petitioner had changed his first name, father's name and surname from the name indicated in the LL.B. certificate issued by the University and, therefore, some time was taken in processing the petitioner's application. The learned counsel further states that Sanad and Identity Card sent on 24th August, 2010 were also received back with the postal remark "incomplete address, not known". In view of this, we see no reason to entertain the petitioner's prayer for compensation. Petition, accordingly, stands disposed of as infructuous. CHIEF JUSTICE SMT. S.R. SONDURBALDOTA, J.