1 S.B.CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.178/2004. J.D.A. Vs. Sh.N.C.Goyal & Anr. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.178/2004. Jaipur Development Authority. VERSUS Shri Naresh Chandra Goyal and Another. 06.05.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH None present for the petitioner. Mr.N.C.Goyal, respondent No.1 present in person. ***** None present for the petitioner. The respondent No.1 Shri N.C.Goyal is present in person. He is the plaintiff. He submits that in view of the fact that his grievance has already been redressed, he does not wish to press the execution in case No.13/2004 pending before the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) No.2, Jaipur City, Jaipur. In view of the aforesaid submission of the respondent No.1 Shri Goyal, the revision petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. The impugned order is set aside. The execution would stand satisfied and be consigned to record. The copy of this order be sent to the learned executing court. This court vide order dated 14.11.2007 has called for the record and till date despite reminders, the record has not been received and the last report of the Registry dated 04.05.2009 is that the record is still awaited. 2 S.B.CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.178/2004. J.D.A. Vs. Sh.N.C.Goyal & Anr. The Registrar (Administration) is directed to call for an explanation from the Presiding Officer of the executing court [Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) No.2, Jaipur City, Jaipur] explaining the circumstances as to why the record had not been sent to this court despite order dated 14.11.2007 and the reminders being issued by this court from time to time. The explanantion should reach this court within a week. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.