IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3875 of 2008 PAPPU SINGH @ RANJEET KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. ----------- 3. 30.4.2010. I have heard Sri Rajendra Prasad Singh, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri D.Mehta, learned A.P.P. for the State and also heard Sri Abhay Shanker Singh, learned counsel appearing for the informant. After having heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioner and after having perused the FIR which is sought to be quashed which is in the form of Annexure-1, the court does not find that there could be any ground for quashing it because the power of police to investigate the case could not be interfered with by any court. The petition is dismissed. However, if the petitioner could have any reasons to agitate any point as regards his complicity in the commission of the offence, he shall have the opportunity under Sections 227 and 228 of the Cr.P.C. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )