IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.4031 of 2007 Date of decision : 9.2.2010 Neelam and others ..Appellants. Vs. Mukhtiar Singh and others ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present : Mr.S.K.Sharma, Advocate for the appellants. Mr.Aman Bansal, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.Anjum Ahmed, Addl.AG Haryana for respondents No.4 and 5. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant submits that against the order passed by Civil Judge (Sr.Divn.) Rohtak exercising the powers of District Judge under Section 372 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short `the Act'), the appeal would lie to the District Judge and not before this Court in terms of the decision rendered by this Court in the case of Jitender Kaur and others Versus Jaskirant Kaur and others FAO No.2524 of 2007 decided on 25.2.2009 reported in 2009 (3) RCR (Civil) 98. Hence, counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to file before the appropriate forum. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 9.2.2010 JUDGE Meenu