1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:09.08.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P(MD)No.8888 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 M.Kannan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Ramanathapuram District Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Inspector of Police, Mandapam Camp Police Station, Mandapam, Ramanathapuram. 3.Mr.Sivakumar The Inspector of Police, Mandapam Police Station, Mandapam, Ramanathapuram. 4.N.Vel Murugan 5.A.Mujeebur Rahman .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the second and third respondents from interfering in civil dispute and in any way harassing the petitioner and his employees or insisting the petitioner to vacate and handover the business premises bearing Door No.18/33, Anna Kadai Veethi, Mandapam Camp, Mandapam, Ramanathapuram District which is the subject matters of civil proceedings at the instance of the fourth and fifth respondents and further direct the first respondent to take necessary action on the complaint dated 01.08.2011 made by the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.R.R.Thamothar Raj For R1 and R2 : Mr.M.Govindan, Spl. Govt. Pleader For R3 to R5 : Notice is dispensed with O R D E R ********** This Writ Petition has been filed for a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the second and third respondents from interfering with the civil dispute and in any way harassing the petitioner and his employees or insisting the petitioner to vacate and hand over the business premises bearing Door No.18/33, Anna Kadai Veethi, Mandapam Camp, Mandapam, Ramanathapuram District, which is the subject matters of civil proceedings, at the instance of the fourth and fifth respondents and to direct the first respondent to take necessary action on the complaint made by the petitioner, dated 01.08.2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2. Heard Mr.R.R.Thamothar Raj, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice for the R-1 and R-2. 3. In view of the order which is going to be passed, notice is dispensed with for R-3 to R-5. 4. By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final hearing. 5. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has given a complaint to the first respondent Superintendent of Police stating that he is being harassed by the second and third respondents in a civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the fourth respondent. Since no action has been taken up so far, the petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition. 6. In view of the above, without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the first respondent is directed to consider the grievance of the petitioner based on the complaint dated 01.08.2011, if there is any merit in the same, in accordance with law. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's case. However, if any action is proposed to be taken against anyone of the respondents, the authority shall take adequate measure to avoid the allegations of violation of principles of natural justice. 7. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. pm Sd/- Assistant Registrar[W] /True copy/ To Sub Assistant Registrar 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Ramanathapuram District Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Inspector of Police, Mandapam Camp Police Station, Mandapam, Ramanathapuram. 3.The Inspector of Police, Mandapam Police Station, Mandapam, Ramanathapuram. +1 cc to the Special Government Pleader, SR.No.27009. W.P.(MD)No.8888 of 2011 Dated:09.08.2011 2P/5C RPB 25.08.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/