IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 17TH AUGUST 2010 / 26TH SRAVANA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1008 of 2010(S) --------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.28426/2007 Dated 03/07/2008 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN WPC 28426/07 ----------------------------------------------------- SANTHA NAIR, AGED 79, D/O.KALYANI AMMA, THIRUVONAM, T.C.6/1597-34, P.T.P.NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695 001 BY ADVS. SRI.VAZHUTHACAUD R.NARENDRAN NAIR SRI.R.T.PRADEEP RESPONDENT(S): 2ND RESPONDENT IN WPC ----------------------------------------------------------------- SMT.RANI GEORGE, I.A.S.(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695 001. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.SMITHA SUKUMAR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Cont.Case(C).No.1008 of 2010-S = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 17th day of August, 2010. Judgment Consequent on Annexure-I judgment, ultimately an award has been passed. The petitioner seeks to make out a case that the said award issued under Section 69 of the KCS Act results in violation of the directions contained in Annexure-I judgment. She tries to say that it violates the direction in Annexure-I that the dispute between the petitioner and the 6th respondent in the writ petition be adjudicated so as to enable the petitioner to claim the relief of return of money. That was an indication of the scope of the arbitration proceedings and there was no direction that the arbitration proceedings should have been decided in any particular manner. The petitioner's remedy, if aggrieved by the decision of the arbitrator, lies elsewhere in terms of the COC1008/10 -: 2 :- KCS Act and at any rate, I am satisfied that no case of contempt is made out. This contempt of court case is hence closed without prejudice to contentions as against the award. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/2808