CWP No.11784 of 2008 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.11784 of 2008 Date of Decision: 27.8.2008 Gurmukh Singh ......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Shri Puneet Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri Sandeep Moudgil, DAG, Punjab. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? HEMANT GUPTA, J. The petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the order dated 24.4.2008 passed by the Registrar-cum- Collector, Kapurthala and quashing of the Registration of sale deed on 9.5.2008, by the Sub-Registrar, in terms of the order dated 24.4.2008. The petitioner is son of Dalip Singh. Said Dalip Singh purchased the property in dispute through auction and a certificate of sale was issued on 30.9.1964. After the death of Dalip Singh, the said property was bequeathed on the basis of Will in favour of the petitioner and his brother, Amar Singh, in equal share. It is alleged by the petitioner that he and sons of his brother late Amar Singh entered into an agreement to sell on 3.11.2006 for a sale consideration of Rs.31,00,000/- in favour of Ajit Pal, Nirmal Kaur, Harkirat Singh and CWP No.11784 of 2008 (2) Jaskirat Singh. It is the case of the petitioner that respondent Nos. 9 to 12 in connivance with one another got the sale deed scribed with the sale consideration of Rs.3,51,000/- instead of the amount agreed in the agreement to sell and, therefore, the order passed by the Registrar, registering the sale deed with the sale consideration of Rs.3,51,000/-, is not tenable. The petitioner has also denied the factum of execution of the sale deed before the Registrar in an inquiry conducted by him. The issues raised in the present writ petition are in the realm of disputed questions of facts, which can only be adjudicated before the Civil Court and not in the writ petition. Consequently, the present writ petition is dismissed. The petitioner is relegated to avail his remedy before the Civil Court, in accordance with law. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE (KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA) JUDGE 27-08-2008 ds