CRLR No. 84 of 2010 Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Shri, Deepak Sharma, Advocate present for the revisionist. Heard This revision is directed against the order dated 10.02.2010 passed by Principal Judge Family Court, Dehradun, in case no 34 of 2005, whereby the revisionist was directed to pay maintenance of Rs. 1500/- per month to the respondent no.2 Master Lalit. Brief facts of the case are that the revisionist had a wife and three children from her. The allegation of the respondent no.1 was that while his first marriage was subsisting he got married to her and respondent no.2 was born out of the relations with her. The revisionist contested the application moved by the respondent no.1 & 2. Both the parties led the evidence. The trial court after discussing the evidence found that though the marriage is not proved on the record but it is sufficiently proved that the revisionist had illicit relations with the respondent no.1, and respondent no. 2 was born out of the relations with the revisionist. With these findings the trial court rejected the application of respondent no.1 for her maintenance but directed the revisionist to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs. 1500/- per month to respondent no.2 (illegitimate child from the relationship). Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the revisionist and after going through the papers on record, this court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the trial court. The revision is dismissed summarily. (P.C.P., J.) 07.05.2010 NP