IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1656 of 2009 ANUJ KUMAR PATEL, SON OF AYODHYA PRASAD PATEL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-USARI, P.S. PAKARIBARAWAN, DISTRICT NAWADAH, AT PRESENT RESIDING OF MOHALLA BELCHHIPARA VERMA SHELL SATIBATI GRAMPANCHAYAT VASAI,TALUKA VASAI, DISTRICT THANE, MUMBAI. -PETITIONER Versus 1. SMT.SEEMA ANUJ KUMAR PATEL @ SMT. SEEMA SINHA D/O BAIJNATH MAHTO AT PRESENT WIFE OF RABHAKAR KUMAR PATEL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE THALPOS, P.S. PAKARIBARAWAN, DISTRICT-NAWADAH. 2. PRABHAKAR KUMAR PATEL @ PRABHAKAR KUMAR, SON OF LATE YUGAL PRASAD MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE THALPOS, P.S. PAKARIBARAWAN, DISTRICT NAWADA. -OPPOSITE PARTIES. ------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Durgesh Nandan For Opp. Parties : Mr. Niraj Kumar-I 2 22.01.2010 After some argument Mr. Durgesh Nandan, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this Civil Revision in view of the provision as contained in Section 19(5) of the Family Court Act, 1984 and its interpretation by a Division Bench of this Court in Jagdish Prasad Chouhan V. Bhuneshwar Chouhan & Anr., 2009 (3) PLJR 931, holding that forum of Civil Revision would not be available against any interim / interlocutory orders passed by Family Court. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw this Civil Revision to avail any other remedy if available under law. Learned counsel for the opposite parties raises no objection. In above view of the matter, this Civil Revision is dismissed as withdrawn. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.) AAhmad