1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3929/2009 Ramrakh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 22nd April 2009. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr.Rakesh Matoria,for the petitioner. .... BY THE COURT By filing this petition for writ, the petitioner said to be a resident of Chak 1 LGM, Post Birmana, Tehsil Suratgarh, District Sriganganagar has sought the reliefs in the following manner:- “(i) the respondents may kindly be directed to issue the patta of the of Chak 1 L.G.M. Murabba No. 199/41 Killa No. 21 to 25 measuring 3 bighas. (ii) the respondents may kindly be restrained to transfer the Government Primary School, 1 L.G.M. to any other place. (iii) Any other appropriate order of direction which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.” Put in brief, the submissions of the petitioner in the writ petition are that the agriculture land situated in Kila Nos.21 to 25 of Murabba No.199/41 at Chak 1 LGM had been recorded as Government land; that the Gram Panchayat Gopalsar, Panchayat Samiti Suratgarh passed a resolution dated 2 06.06.2006 proposing that the land in Kila Nos. 21, 22 & 23 of the said Muarraba No.199/41 admeasuring 3 bighas be reserved for the purpose of Government Primary School; that there had been a sanction made for starting the Government Primary School on the said land; and that the Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat addressed a communication to the Sub Divisional Officer, Suratgarh on 27.08.2008 seeking issuance of patta regarding the said land. It is alleged that a few of the residents of the village concerned, in order to settle their scores had been making attempts for shifting the school to some other place. It is pointed out in the writ petition that the school is sought to be shifted to the land comprised in Murabba No.198/15 and it is alleged that such shifting would cause hardship and prejudice to the petitioner and the other residents of the village whose children are studying in the said school. While considering the matter at motion-admission, learned counsel for the petitioner was posed the question about the locus standi of the petitioner and about the legal right of the petitioner whose infringement could be considered in this writ petition. Learned counsel responded with the submissions that his children are studying in the school concerned and he is seeking enforcement of the resolution 3 already taken by the Gram Panchayat. The submissions have their own shortcomings. The location of the school is essentially a matter to be considered by the concerned authorities. From the material placed on record, it is not borne out if in this regard the authorities intend to proceed contrary to the law. So far the resolution taken by the Gram Panchayat is concerned, suffice is to say that this writ petition has not been filed by the Gram Panchayat concerned. In view of the frame of the petition and its subject- matter, hardly any reason appears for issuing any writ, order or direction at the instance of the petitioner. Exercise of writ jurisdiction at the instance o7f the petitioner is refused; and this petition stands rejected. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. s.soni Mohan