IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50265 of 2008 MANOJ YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.1.2009 Heard Mr. D. K. Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.B. Rai, learned A.P.P. The fact is that the informant had borrowed Rs.13,000/- as loan at a particular rate of interest. The informant says that he had paid up the loan but still persons like the petitioner and others named in the F.I.R. were asking to pay Rs.5/- per 100 per day as interest to them. The contention is that the facts are exaggerated and if the informant paid up the loan, there was no need for the petitioner to harass him for any other reason. It is contended that, in fact, the informant did not pay up the amount and has filed a false case. Let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S. Chandra, J.M., Ist Class, Naugachia, in Gopalpur (Rangra) P.S. case no.115 of 2006. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )