IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 9756 of 2008 Between: KATIKALA Narayana S/o.Late Balaiah Residing at Maheswaram village and Mandal R.R.District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra PRadesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings,at Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad 3 The Station House officer, Chandrayanagutta Police station, At Jangammet, Falakuna, Hyderabad 4 Fayaqu Khan S/o Ishaq Mohammed Khan Residing at H.No.18-2-266, Jangammet Falakunama,Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in interfering in the civil dispute pressurising the parties to compromise failing which parties will be implicated in Criminal Proceedings as being not only illegal,but also misuse of office by the 2nd and 3rd respondents and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MRSYED SHAREEF AHMED Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 9756 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: The petitioner’s allegation that the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are interfering with the civil disputes and pressurizing the petitioner to compromise with the 4th respondent, has been denied. The learned Government Pleader for Home on instructions obtained from the 3rd respondent states that though the 4th respondent herein lodged a complaint registered as crime No. 47 of 2007 on the file of Police Station, Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad accusing the petitioner of having committed cognizable offences under Section 420, 468, 506 r/w 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, on investigation, the petitioner was examined as L.W.3 and the investigation revealed no nexus between the petitioner and the offences alleged and hence he is not being treated as an ‘accused. Learned Government Pleader for Home on instructions states that the official respondents have never pressurized the petitioner nor tried to settle the civil disputes. In the light of the statement by the learned Government Pleader for Home, no further proceedings are warranted. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. _____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 30-06-2008 Pvks/*