Criminal Revision No. 394 of 2006 1 .. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 394 of 2006. Date of Decision : 23.02.2011. Mrs. Tirath Kaur ......Petitioner Versus Balwant Singh & others ......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. J.S.Chahal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. H.S.Bhullar, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 1 to 6. Mr. Ranvir S. Chauhan, DAG Punjab, for the respondent-State. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) Tirath Kaur – complainant has filed this revision against the judgment dated October 16th, 2004 of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Phillaur, whereby, respondents No.1 and 6 were acquitted of the charge in case bearing First Information Report No. 212 dated November 16, 1999 under Sections 406 and 498-A of Indian Penal Code, Police Station – Nurmahal. The case was also registered against Jagjit Singh, husband of the petitioner. During the pendency of the trial, he was declared Proclaimed Offender. Vide judgment dated January 11th, 2010, he has also been acquitted by the trial Magistrate, as stated by learned State counsel. 2. Admittedly, Tirath Kaur and her husband - Jagjit Singh were residing in Canada. They got divorced in Canada. They have re-married. The present case was registered against the parents-in-law, brothers-in-law and sisters-in-law of Tirath Kaur. 3. The marriage between the parties was performed Criminal Revision No. 394 of 2006 2 .. in the year 1997. They were residing abroad. Respondents being parents-in-law, brothers-in-law and sisters-in-law had no occasion to dishonestly mis-appropriate the property of Tirath Kaur or subjecting her to cruelty. Otherwise too, Jagjit Singh has also been acquitted. 4. In view of above, this Court does not find any infirmity in the impugned judgment on any count which would call for the interference of this Court while exercising its revisional jurisdiction. 5. The revision petition is, therefore, dismissed. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 23.2.2011. som