@/ HLGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATT.'SGARH : BSLASPUR SINGLE BENCH: Hon'bie Shri S.R. Nayak, CJ WRiT PETITION No. 1027 OF 2005 PETITIONERS 1. SEFE 2. Vinod Kumar Thawani Aged about 45 years, S/o. Mayaram, Vinod ESectronic, near Municipa! Office, Champa, Tahsii Champa, Dlstrict Janjgsr-Champa. (C.G.) Sachchanand Thawani, Versui S/o Mayararn Thawanl, Seema Generat Store. Sadar Bazar, Champa, Tahsii Champa, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Firm Ganeshila! Guiabchand, Partnershlp Firm, Ri'o Naiia, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Mr. K.M. Ansari, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, learned counse! for the respondent. (Passed on 8 of December 2005) VVhite assailing the order made by the learned trial Judge on 7.12.2002 on an application fited by the petitioner under Order 9 Rule 13 of C. P.C., it was sontended that the dependant-petjt.oner came to be placed ex-parte under a wrong advice given hy hjs counse! who is dead. The Veracity of this self-sen/ing statement cannot be verified. Be that as it may, even otherwise, nothing is placed before the Court to possibly infer that the Advocate of the Plaintiffwrongly advised the defendant not to appear before the Court on the date or' hearing and that resulted in defendant being placed ex-parte. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed, however, with no order as to costs -—~--— Sd/- Chief Justice