IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7742 of 2011 UMESH SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 29.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Taking into consideration that grievous injury has been found on the head of the informant which is said to have been caused by the petitioner with Hasua, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Danapur (Shahpur) P.S. Case No. 686 of 2006 stands rejected. It appears that the case of the petitioner has not been committed to the court of sessions as yet. The learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, District-Patna is hereby directed to commit the case of the petitioner to the court of sessions in accordance with law without further delay and after commitment of the case of the petitioner to the court of sessions, the learned trial court shall expedite the trial of the petitioner and shall dispose of the same preferably within nine months from the date of receipt of the record in sessions court. It is made clear that if the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within the above-said period, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)