IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14261 of 2009 KAMESHWAR BHAGAT @ KUSHWAHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 30.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is one of the accused in relation to Valmikinagar P.S. Case No. 48 of 2008 for the offence under sections 363 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the informant in his absence his daughter Babita Kumari has been kidnapped by certain accused persons in which the petitioner is supposed to have played role. It is further alleged that she has been sold to Birendra Yadav and Prabhu Yadav. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the girl, in question, has decided to walk out of the house and marry with said Birendra Yadav. Petitioner has no specific role in the crime in question except suspicion. Therefore he should be enlarged on bail looking at the materials and the circumstances against petitioner. Looking at the role played by the petitioner, let the petitioner, namely, Kameshwar Bhagat @ Kushwaha be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Valmikinagar P.S. Case no. 48 of 2008. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)