[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL [LODGING] NO.368 OF 2007 APPEAL [LODGING] NO.368 OF 2007 APPEAL [LODGING] NO.368 OF 2007 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.776 OF 2006 C/W COMPANY APPLICATION NO.1043 OF 2006 Sakshi Ideal Investments and Trading Pvt. Ltd. .... Appellant Vs. Kotak Mahindra Capital Company Ltd. .... Respondent AND AND AND APPEAL [LODGING] NO.370 OF 2007 APPEAL [LODGING] NO.370 OF 2007 APPEAL [LODGING] NO.370 OF 2007 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.777 OF 2006 C/W COMPANY APPLICATION NO.1044 OF 2006 Sakshi Ideal Investments and Trading Pvt. Ltd. .... Appellant Vs. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. .... Respondent Shri Dhananjay Padwal i/b M/s. M.P. Vashi & Associates for the Appellant in both Appeals. Sarvasri Sandeep Parikh with Prashant Beri i/b M/s. Beri & Co. for the Respondent in both Appeals. CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & D.G. KARNIK, JJ. D.G. KARNIK, JJ. D.G. KARNIK, JJ. DATED: MAY 03, 2007 DATED: MAY 03, 2007 DATED: MAY 03, 2007 P.C: P.C: P.C: Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has placed on record a copy of the order dated 15-2-2007 passed in Company Petition Nos.776 and 777 of 2006 [2] whereby it is apparent that the impugned orders have already been recalled by the learned single Judge and has passed a modified order on 15-2-2007. Considering the same, the learned Advocate for the appellants states that in order to enable the appellants to file a proper appeal, challenging the order dated 15-2-2007 along with the impugned orders, the appellants crave leave to withdraw these appeals. The appeals are accordingly allowed to be withdrawn with the said liberty. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on any of the points sought to be raised in the appeals. The appeals stand disposed of. (D.G.Karnik, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/M7alg368.7 sjs/M7alg368.7 sjs/M7alg368.7