IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12353 of 2009 Savitri Kumari wife of Sushil Kumar, resident of village Hathi Khal, Post Office Songardwa, Police Station Fulwaria, Block Fulwaria, District Gopalganj Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Secretary, Department of Welfare, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna 3. The Collector, Gopalganj 4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Gopalganj 5. The Block Development Officer, Fulwaria, District Gopalganj 6. Chandan Das Gupta, Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Raj, Bairagi Tola, District Gopalganj 7. Annu Neha, the Child Development Project Officer, Block Development Officer Fulwari, District Gopalganj ----------- 02/ 17.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner was recommended for appointment as Anganwari Sewika of Hathikhal centre within Fulwaria Block in the District of Gopalganj, vide recommendation of the Mukhiya and the Member Secretary dated 28.3.2007, Annexure-1 to this application. In the light of such recommendation, petitioner was instructed under letter no. 59 dated 28.3.2007, Annexure-2 to proceed for training. Later, the Child Development Project Officer, Fulwaria also directed the petitioner under letter no. 124 dated 20.2.2007 to report for training at the Anganwari training centre Banjari between 22.7.2007 to 28.7.2007. In compliance of such direction, petitioner also took training, but she is not being given appointment letter. 3. Let the petitioner represent before the District Magistrate, Gopalganj along with a certified copy of this order. 2 Thereafter the District Magistrate, Gopalganj should consider her case in the light of the recommendation dated 28.3.2007, Annexure-1 and letter No. 59 dated 28.3.2007, Annexure-2 issued under the joint signature of the Mukhiya and the Member Secretary of the Bairagi Tola Panchayat as also letter no. 124 dated 20.2.2007 of the Child Development Project Officer, Fulwaria directing the petitioner to report for training between 22.7.2007 to 28.7.2007 and pass appropriate orders in this regard, as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt of the representation. 4. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)