IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 16629 of 2008. Decided on 24.02.2011. _____________________________________________________ Brahama Nand …Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent. : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for the respondents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. A.K. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty reserved to his client to file a fresh representation for the redressal of his grievance. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with a direction to the petitioner to make a representation to the Principal Secretary (IPH) within a period of two weeks from today. Thereafter, the same shall be decided by the Principal Secretary (IPH), in accordance with law, by passing a speaking/detailed order within a further period two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - petitioner. He will not be influenced by the delay and latches. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge February 24, 2011. (bhupender) - 3 - `