IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.907 of 2008 BRAHMADEO PRASAD SINGH, son of late Gopal Mandal, resident of village- Sharifa, P.S. Sultanganj, District- Bhagalpur…Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Primary Middle and Adult Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. Sri Lalan Jha, the Regional Deputy Director, Education, Bhagalpur. 3. Nitish Chandra Mandal, the District Superintendent of Education, Bhagalpur. 4. Mihir Kumar Singh, the District Magistrate, Bhagalpur 5. Sri Kaushal Kishore Bhagat, the Headmaster, Middle School, Sanhaula, Bhagalpur. 6. Pradeep Kumar, the Director-General, Provident Fund, Pant Bhawan, Patna. 7. Ashok Kumar Choudhary, the District Provident Fund Officer, Bhagalpur…. Opposite Parties. ----------- 4. 1.9.2009 Heard learned counsels for the parties. The petitioner claims violation of the order dated 27.8.2003 passed in C.W.J.C. No.5500 of 2003. The admitted position is that on the non-compliance of the said order, the petitioner had earlier filed M.J.C. No. 182 of 2005, which was disposed of by order dated 17.4.2006 by this Court holding that it did not feel inclined to proceed with the said M.J.C. application any further since the due amount of the petitioner had already been paid to him. Subsequently, the petitioner has raised a claim before the Regional Deputy Director of Education, Bhagalpur that still an amount of Rs. 30,729/- has not been paid to him. The stand in the show cause of opposite party No.3, the District Superintendent of Education, Bhagalpur is that the petitioner was directed to appear before him along with relevant papers, but he has not appeared, although earlier the matter stood concluded before 2 this Court by the disposal of the previous contempt application. In the above circumstances, the issue raised by the petitioner cannot be decided under the contempt jurisdiction of this Court, as this Court has already disposed of the contempt application on being satisfied about the compliance of the order dated 27.8.2003 under contempt. The contempt application is, accordingly, dismissed. However the petitioner, if aggrieved, may approach the competent authority with relevant proofs, which shall be considered in accordance with law. VPS (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)