IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 5TH APRIL 2010 / 15TH CHAITHRA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 1818 of 2010 PETITIONER/ACCUSED -------------------------------------- UMMER.K. S/O. ALI, AGED 46 YEARS, KANNANKEEL HOUSE, KAYYAM, ARIYIL.P.O.., PATTUVAM AMSOM, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.SATHEESH RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT -------------------------- STATE THROUGH CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, WOMEN CELL, KANNUR, KANNUR DISTRICT. REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.TEKCHAND THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------ B.A. NO. 1818 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 5th day of April, 2010 O R D E R Apprehending arrest by the Circle Inspector of Police, Women Cell, Kannur or by any other police officer in the Women Cell, on the basis of a petition filed by Asmath.P., wife of the petitioner, the petitioner has filed this application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. It is stated that the wife of the petitioner had filed a petition before the Kannapuram Police Station alleging harassment. When the petitioner apprehended arrest, he filed B.A.No.1152 of 2010 before this Court. An interim order was granted in that case. It is stated that thereafter, the de facto complainant, Asmath.P., filed a petition before the Women Cell, Kannur, making the same allegations as raised before the Kannapuram Police Station. The petitioner apprehends that he would be arrested by the police. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. B.A. NO. 1818 OF 2010 :: 2 :: 4. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that no crime was registered against the petitioner. Both the parties were called to the police station for conciliation. It is also submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that usually Women Cell does not register a case. Therefore the apprehension of arrest is not genuine. It is submitted that the Circle Inspector of Police, Women Cell, Kannur or any other police officer in the Women Cell, Kannur has no intention to arrest the petitioner. The learned Public Prosecutor further submitted that Crime No.132 of 2010 was registered by the Edakkad Police against the petitioner. The submissions made by the learned Public Prosecutor are recorded and the Bail Application is closed. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/