IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1834 of 2009 Sri Jagdish Prasad Sinha @ Sri Jagdish Prasad son of late Indralal Singh R/o village Chinia Bela,P.O. Shripalpur, P.S. Punpun Dist. Patna …………………..Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar Sri Chandradaya Prasad, J.T.O-cum-S.D.O, Telephone DepartmentMasaurhi P.s. masaurhi, Dist. Patna. ……….Opposite Parties. ------------- 2 12.12.2011 The complainant petitioner has preferred this revision application against the order dated 27.08.2009 passed by the learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate in complaint case No. 10 (C) 2005 by which the accused Chandradaya Prasad O.P. no.2 has been discharged under section 245 Cr.P.C. as there is no evidence against him for the offences punishable under section 166, 167, 420 and 467 of the Indian Penal Code. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. On perusal of the impugned order it appears that the learned trial court has considered the evidence of the witnesses adduced against the accused before charge and after considering their evidence the learned trial court has found that there is no material on the record to proceed with the accused O.P. no.2 and he has been discharged from the allegation. I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. M.Rahman (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)