IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17776 of 2008 RAM VINAY SINGH, son of late Nageshwar Prasad Singh,resident of Flat no.C-4B-401 of Priadarshani Apartment, Boring Canal Road, P.S. Budha Colony. Versus 1. PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION through its Municipal Commissioner, Maurya Lok, Patna. 2. Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Maurya Lok, Patna. ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Rajendra Prasad Singh Senior Advocate Mrs.Anuradha Singh,Advocate For Respondent No.3 : Mr. S.A. Narayan,Senior Advovcate Mr.Rajiv Roy,Advocate Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate --- 7. 17.2.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 22.12.2008, it is submitted that the petitioner has already filed show cause to which respondent No.3 has also filed his written statement before the Town Commissioner and final decision is to be taken by the Town Commissioner. The grievance of learned counsel for Respondent No.3 is that for the sole reason that respondent No.3 could not appear on 5.2.2009 before the Town Commissioner the matter has been fixed for 11.5.2009 by the Town Commissioner. It is prayed by him that the issue should be decided by the Town Commissioner one way or the other within a short period, since the stay is operating in favour of the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the Town Commissioner to dispose of the matter within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order before him by fixing a fresh 2 date for hearing the matter and issuing notice, if required to any other party. Till the final decision by the Town Commissioner on this particular issue, no step shall be taken by the authorities of the Municipal Corporation pursuant to the order dated 15.11.2008 ( Annexure-1). VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.)