IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.91 of 2011 Bihar Scientific Service Association through its President Shashi Bhushan Prasad, son of late Shiva Prasad, resident of Nala Road, Shiva Dham, Patna-800003 --- Petitioner/Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary to Government, Old Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Secretary to Government, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Vishweshwariya Bhavan, Bailey Road, Patna. 3. The Secretary to Government, Department of Personnel and Administrative, Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 4. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary to Government, Finance Department, Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 5. The Secretary to Cabinet-cum-Co-ordination Department, Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 6. The Chief Engineer, Central Design Organisation, Road Construction Department, Bihar, C.D.O. Building, Bailey Road, Patna. 7. The Joint Secretary to Government, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Vishweswariya Bhavan, Bailey Road, Patna ---- Respondents/Opposite Parties. ----------- 2. 27.7.2011 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Heard Mr. Kumar Kaushik, learned Assistant Counsel to Government Pleader No.11. This application has been filed by the petitioner of C.W.J.C. No. 3698 of 2000, seeking review of our order dated 7.2.2011, whereby the writ petition was dismissed. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties. The writ petition challenges the Bihar Technical 2 Service Rules, 1999. The same was dismissed on the ground that normally it is not given to this Court to interfere with the wisdom of the Legislature which has framed the Rules in question in exercise of powers conferred by Article 309 of the Constitution of India. The following words of the order may be reproduced to indicate the reasoning assigned by us: “It is entirely for the Legislature to create the structure and define the terms and conditions of service of the employees in the Rules which seeks to govern them. This Court is reluctant to interfere with the administrative structure created by Acts or Rules of the Legislature.” We are of the view that no ground for interference with the order in question is made out. The review application is dismissed. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar,J. ) ( S. P. Singh, J.)