THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2066 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner, who is defendant No.6 in O.S.No.191 of 2008 on the file of Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri, Ranga Reddy District, filed this civil revision petition questioning the docket order, dated 13.04.2009 passed in the said suit. On 17.06.2009, this Court while issuing notice before admission, granted interim stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.191 of 2008. The said order was extended from time to time. While so, the first respondent/plaintiff No.1 filed CRP.MP.No.5175 of 2009 to vacate the said interim order of stay, along with the counter-affidavit, wherein he stated that the petitioner has filed I.A. in SR.No.1935 of 2009 under Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act, but the same was dismissed for non-prosecution vide order, dated 07.05.2009. He also stated that the petitioner ought to have questioned the said order instead of the docket order, which was impugned in this revision petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the first respondent. Through the impugned docket order, the trial Court while treating the evidence of the plaintiffs as nil, posted the matter to 20.04.2009 for the evidence of defendant No.6. In fact, the petitioner filed an I.A. under Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act but the same was dismissed by the trial Court vide its order, dated 07.05.2009. The petitioner, without questioning the said order, has challenged the docket order, dated 13.04.2009. That apart, there is no connection between the grounds raised by the petitioner in the present revision and the facts recorded in the impugned docket order. However, the impugned docket order does not give rise to any cause of action to file a revision petition nor show any reason to question the same. Therefore, interference of this Court with the same under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is not called for. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ N.V.RAMANA, J 18th SEPTEMBER, 2009. kvni