IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15824 of 2011 Rameshwar Singh, Son of Late Bansh Ropan Singh, Resident of Village Mathurapur, P.O. – Dalmianagar P.S. – Dehri, District – Rohtas (Bihar). ……… Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar. 2. The Director, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar. 3. The District Education Officer, Rohtas. 4. The Provident Fund Officer, Rohtas. 5. The Accountant General Bihar, Patna. 6. The District Magistrate, Rohtas, Bihar. 7. The Treasury Officer, Sasaram (Rohtas), Bihar. …. Respondents ---------------------------------- 2 15.09.2011 Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Harish, learned AC to Government Pleader No. 20, who appears on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, 6 & 7 and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No. 5/Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 31.08.2010 as ‘Assistant Teacher’ from Sudama High School Shidhauli (Rohtas) has prayed for directing the respondents to revise his pension as per 6th Pay Revision, payment of difference of arrears of salary from April 2007 to December, 2008 and payment of remaining amount under the head of GPF. In view of the fact and circumstances, the court is of the opinion that writ petition can be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation so far as claim of revision of pension and arrear salary are concerned before Respondent No. 3/District Education Officer, Rohtas and for remaining amount under the head of provident fund before Respondent No. 2 4/Provident Fund Officer, Rohtas within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, both the Respondents are required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. The Respondent No. 3/District Education Officer, Rohtas, if considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, is required to take steps so that sanction order may be issued within three months from the date of filing of the representation, and thereafter, Respondent No. 5/Accountant General, Bihar, Patna is required to issue authorization within four weeks from the date of receipt of the sanction order from the state authority. The Respondent No. 4/Provident Fund Officer, Rohtas, if considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, is required to pass order for payment within three months from the date of filing of such representation. Even in case of refusal, both the Respondents are directed to pass speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within three months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction the writ petition stands disposed of. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)