IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CS No. 26 of 2010 Date of decision: 12.12.2011 ________________________________________________________________ Diwan Chand son of Shri Gurdyal Singh, resident of village Billanwali, Post Office Baddi, Tehsil Baddi, District Solan, H.P. .....Plaintiff. Versus 1. Azij 2. Bagga, both sons of Shri Baziru, resident of village Nangal Upparla, Post Office Nangal, Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P. .....Defendants. Plaint under Section 26 read with Order 7, Rules 1, 2 and 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure as well as under Sections 15, 19, 20 and 22 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 for specific performance of agreement dated 20.11.2006 with respect to land measuring 5 Bighas 8 Biswas, bearing Khasra No. 611, comprised in Khata Khatauni No. 134 min/141 min, situated in the area of village Nagal Uparla, Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P. as per Jamabandi for the year 2000-2001 as well as for permanent prohibitory injunction as well as mandatory injunction and in the alternative for refund of earnest money alongwith interest at the rate of 12% per annum as well as compensation/damages. Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, J. 1 Whether approved for reporting? No. ________________________________________________________________ For the plaintiff: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate (plaintiff in person). For the defendants: Mr. Shanti Swaroop, Advocate (defendants in person. V.K. Sharma, J. (Oral). The parties have entered into compromise. They have filed compromise in writing which is taken on record as Ex. C-1. Statements of the parties recorded separately, which also go to support compromise, Ex. C-1. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. ...2... 2. In view of amicable settlement between the parties, as is reflected from compromise, Ex. C-1, the suit is disposed of as compromised. Compromise, Ex. C-1, shall form part of the decree. The parties shall abide by terms and conditions of compromise, Ex. C-1, in letter and spirit and failure to do so shall entail consequences as per law. 3. The suit, as also pending OMP(s), if any, shall stand disposed of as compromised, as above. As the suit has been compromised before recording of evidence, the plaintiff shall be entitled for refund of court fee in accordance with rules. (V.K. Sharma) Judge 12th December, 2011 (virender)