( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.169 OF 2001 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.169 OF 2001 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.169 OF 2001 Padmakar Gajanan Redkar .. Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr.A.S.Khandeparkar for the petitioner. Mr.Milind D. Parab for the first informant-original complainant. Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 25th April, 2008. DATED : 25th April, 2008. DATED : 25th April, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Advocates appearing on both the sides. 2. The petitioner and the 1st informant by name Yashwant Arjun Kawale have settled the dispute in the matter where the petitioner was convicted under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer imprisonment and to pay fine. The application for compounding of the matter is tendered today by learned Advocate Mr.Khandeparkar for the petitioner and learned Advocate Mr.Milind Parab for the original complainant. Learned A.P.P. Mr.Saste appears on behalf of the State. Affidavit duly affirmed by original complainant Mr.Yashwant Arjun Kawale in a way stating the facts leading to the settlement of the dispute being affidavit dated 24.4.2008 is filed. By the said affidavit, the original complainant wants to ( 2 ) compound the matter. In view of the above, the application for compounding the matter dated 24.4.2008 will have to be granted and proper orders will have to be passed. Hence, the order :- a) Application dated 24.4.2008 taken on record. Permission to compound offence arising out of C.R.No.4 of 1990 of Vengurla police station being the C.R.in connection with R.C.C. No.22 of 1990 is granted. b) The respondent No.1 has admitted the receipt of Rs.7,000/- in the compounding application by way of settlement of all the disputes. c) In view of this, the order dated 29.7.2000 passed by the learned J.M.F.C., Vengurla thereby convicting the petitioner under Section 406 of the I.P.C. and sentencing him to suffer imprisonment of one year and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- and to undergo simple imprisonment for 2 months i/d. of payment of fine is set aside. Similarly, the order passed by learned Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg thereby confirming the order dated 29.7.2000 passed by learned J.M.F.C., Vengurla ( 3 ) being order in Cri.Appeal No.8 of 2000 is also set aside. Petitioner Mr.Padmakar Gajanan Redkar is acquitted of charge under Section 406 of the I.P.C. The bail bonds of the petitioner stands cancelled. d) The amount of fine of Rs.1,000/- to be returned to the petitioner by the concerned Court in which the fine amount has been deposited. 3. The learned Advocates on both the sides pray that the Muddemal Article No.1 Golden Ball referred to in the order passed by J.M.F.C., Vengurla dated 29.7.2000 be returned to Yashwant Arjun Kawale i.e. first informant. In view of the joint request, the golden ball as Muddemal Article No.1 be returned to the first informant Yashwant Kawale by the concerned Court wherein the said Muddemal is lying. 4. The Muddemal Article No.2 Notebook be handed over to the legal representatives of the deceased Sadanand Madkaikar being original accused No.2 in the R.C.C. No.22 of 1998 which was decided by J.M.F.C., Vengurla. 5. For the reasons aforesaid, Revision stands ( 4 ) disposed off. (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.)