IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7320 of 2011 1. AMARNATH JHA SON OF LATE CHINTAMANI JHA 2. PRAMILA DEVI WIFE OF SURESH MISHRA BOTH R/O VILL. SANTNAGAR, POLICE STATION-BHAIRAV ASTHAN, DIST-MADHUBANI. --- PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. COLLECTOR, MADHUBANI 3. ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, MADHUBANI 4. DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND REFORMS, JHANJHARPUR, DIST. MADHUBANI. 5. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, JHANJHARPUR, DIST. MADHUBANI. 6. CIRCLE OFFICER JHANJHARPUR, DIST. MADHUBANI -- RESPONDENTS 1ST SET 7. BIJAY KUMAR MISHRA 8. NAND KUMAR MISHRA 9. SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA S/O BABU NARAYAN MISHRA ALL ( RESPONDENTS 7 TO 9) R/O VILL-HARNA P.S. ANDHRATHARHI, DIST. MADHUBANI. --- RESPONDENTS 2ND SET. For the petitioners : Mr. V. Nath, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar No.1, S.C.12 ----------- 02 27.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners, who are brother and sister raise a grievance with respect to order dated 26.02.2009 passed in Mutation Revision case no. 16 of 2007-08/ 22 of 2007-08 whereby the revision preferred by the petitioners against the order dated 08.03.2007 passed by respondent DCLR Jhanjharpur in Mutation Appeal case no. 03 of 2006-07 has been affirmed. On a perusal of the appellate order as well as revisional order, it appears that issues of fact based on appraisal of materials produced by the parties have been decided. This Court, in exercise of its extraordinary writ jurisdiction, may not go into that aspect of the 2 matter. It further appears from perusal of the two order(s) that question of title is involved between the parties who claim purchase of the land from the descendents of Kumod Chandra Banerjee. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted, and in my view fairly, that that mutation of names in the revenue records neither creates title nor extinguishes it. Petitioners, therefore, may approach Court of competent civil jurisdiction for ventilation of their grievance(s). In case the petitioners decide on approaching the Court then any finding touching the title of the subject land in the impugned order shall not prejudice the case of the petitioners. The application stands disposed of. Sym (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)