1 W.P. 9656.2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9656 OF 2011 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders ................................ CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 21/12/2011. Mr. A.N.Irpatgire, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. P.M.Shah, Sr. Counsel instructed by Mr. G.N.Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent. Mr. V.D.Salunke, Advocate for Resp. No. 4. Mr. B.V.Wagh, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for State. ..................... PER COURT : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. The petitioner assails the order of the Returning Officer accepting the nomination papers of respondent nos. 5 to 7. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent nos. 5 to 7 are not running industry for more than six ( 6 ) months and as such have incurred disqualification as per the bye-laws of the said Society. 3. Whether the respondents are running their industry since 2 W.P. 9656.2011 six ( 6 ) months or the same is closed since six ( 6 ) months is the disputed question of fact. The nomination papers of the respondents are accepted. Even otherwise, the petitioner has got alternate remedy to challenge the election in case the need arises. 4. In light of the above and in view of the fact that the petition involves disputed question of facts, I am not inclined to entertain the Writ Petition. 5. The Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file election dispute or avail such remedy as is available in law in respect of the same subject matter. No costs. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ] KNP/W.P. 9656.2011