IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 14TH AUGUST 2009 / 23RD SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 23311 of 2009(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- DIVYA JAMES,HSST(ENGLISH),M.S.HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,RANNY,PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. SRI.JACOB P.ALEX RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. DIRECTOR,HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HSE,OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR,HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION,CORPORATION BUILDINGS,IV FLOOR,PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE MANAGER,CORPORTION MANAGEMENT OF SCHOOLS,ST.THOMAS VALIYAPALLY EDAVAKA,RANNY, PATHANAMTHITTA. 4. SANDHYA SREENIVASAN,HSST,M.S.HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,RANNY,PATHANAMTHITTA. SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.23311/2009-H ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 14th day of August, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is seeking approval of appointment of H.S.S.T (English) consequent on Ext.P1 order of appointment. Prior to her appointment, she was working as H.S.A (English) in St.Thomas, High School, Pazhavangadi, Ranny. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the approval has not been granted so far presumably on the basis of the objection raised by the fourth respondent in the matter. The objection submitted by the fourth respondent is produced as Ext.P2. 2. It is further pointed out that by Ext.P3, the Manager has given explanation in the matter before the second respondent. There will be a direction to the second respondent to take a decision on the proposal for approval of appointment of the petitioner after hearing the petitioner, the third respondent and the fourth respondent and, after considering the points raised in Ext.P3, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms