1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3201 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO. 3201 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO. 3201 OF 2009 Rajshekhar Sidhaling Vairagkar .. Petitioner (Org. Defendant) Versus Shivanand Gurubasayya Chivari & Anr. Respondents (Org.Plaintiffs) Mr. Anand S. Kulkarni for the petitioner. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATE: 1st April, 2009. DATE: 1st April, 2009. DATE: 1st April, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. No interference with the discretionary order passed by the trial Court is warranted. Assuming that there is any error of jurisdiction committed by the lower Court in the impugned order, that can always be corrected in the appeal if the petitioner is required to file one against the final decision of the trial Court. 2 As observed by the Apex Court in the case of Surya Dev Surya Dev Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai & Ors. reported in (2003) 6 SCC Rai v. Ram Chander Rai & Ors. reported in (2003) 6 SCC Rai v. Ram Chander Rai & Ors. reported in (2003) 6 SCC 675, 675, 675, in particular, in Paragraph 39, the Petition is dismissed, keeping all the questions raised by the petitioner to be agitated in the appeal, if so advised. Order accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)