IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32441 of 2010 RUCHI SHARMA @ RUBI SHARMA & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 28.10.2010 Power has been filed on behalf of the complainant. Let it be kept on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned P.P. for the State assisted by learned counsel for the complainant. Admittedly, petitioner no. 1 is married Nanad, petitioner no. 2 Nandosi and petitioner no. 3 is mother-in-law of the informant. It appears from the F.I.R. that the marriage took place in the year 2004 and the case was lodged in the year 2010 i.e. after six years of the marriage. Moreover, no specific overt act has been alleged against the petitioners. Contention of learned counsel for the informant is that the informant wants to lead her conjugal life with her husband but it is petitioners who created problem in the married life of the informant. Admittedly, husband of the informant is not petitioner here. In my view, the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the informant may consider at the time of hearing of the bail application of the husband of the informant. Accordingly, It is ordered that petitioners (Ruchi Sharma @ Rubi Sharma, Shambhu Nath Sharma @ Shambhu Sharma @ Shambhu Nath Shastri and Ratna Mala Devi) in the 2 event of their arrest or surrender within thirty days from the date of communication of this order, shall be released on bail in connection with Suryagarha P.S. Case No. 74 of 2010 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Shahid/Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)