IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2008 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 35354 of 2008(H) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- CHARLES T. DAVID, S/O.DAVID, THOPPIL HOUSE,PERINGOLE, KOLENCHERY.P.O, ERNAKULAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI SRI.BRIJESH MOHAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PERIYAR VALLEY, IRRIGATION PROJECT DIVISION NO.I, PATTAL, PERUMBAVOOR. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUTHENCRUZ POLICE STATION, PUTHENCRUZ, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. N. SUDHA DEVI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).35354/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 1st day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner, who is the resident on the western side of Puduppanampancode canal bund road of Periyar Valley Irrigation Project, is aggrieved by the user of said road by heavy vehicles causing damage to the road. He made a representation to the RDO seeking an order prohibiting movement of heavy vehicles along the said road. As per the directions issued by this Court in Ext.P2 judgment, prohibitory order was issued by the RDO, as Ext.P3, after hearing all persons concerned. Petitioner's grievance is the apparent reluctance on the part of the first respondent, the competent authority, to enforce Ext.P3 prohibitory order. Petitioner has submitted Ext.P4 representation in this regard before the first respondent. 2. Having heard learned Government Pleader also, writ petition is disposed of directing the first W.P.(C).35354/2008 2 respondent to look into Ext.P3 and take further action without further delay, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. First respondent shall intimate the action taken pursuant to Ext.P3 to the second respondent. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs