IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2998 of 2005 SHANKAR DAYAL SINGH, SON OF KAPILDEO SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – RATU ROAD HESAL MORE, P.S. – SUKHDEO NAGAR, DISTRICT – RANCHI (JHARKHAND). …………… PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR. 2. THE D.G. CUM I.G. OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE D.I.G. OF POLICE, B.M.P., NORTHERN ZONE, MUZAFFARPUR. 4. THE COMMANDANT, B.M.P.6, MUZAFFARPUR. 5. THE DY.S.P. CUM ENQUIRY OFFICER, B.M.P. 9, JAMALPUR. ……………… RESPONDENTS. ----------- 12/ 02.05.2011 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. Petitioner has challenged the order of dismissal dated 30.8.2002 (Annexure-11) the order passed in Appeal by the Deputy Inspector General, Minitary Police, Muzaffarpur dated 26.11.2002 (Annexure-12) and the order passed in memorial by the D.G.P. cum I.G. of Police dated 25.9.2004(Annexure-14). Earlier also C.W.J.C. No. 4761 of 2003 was filed by the petitioner challenging the order contained in Annexure-11 i.e. order of dismissal passed in the departmental proceeding as well as appellate order affirming the order of dismissal. However, the same was disposed of, considering the pendency of the memorial preferred 2 by the petitioner. Present writ application has been filed after dismissal of memorial preferred by the petitioner. On consideration of the impugned orders, the finding recorded there as well as the statement made in the counter affidavit, I do not find any merit in this writ application. It is dismissed. However, for the same charges a criminal case was also instituted against the petitioner, which is still undecided. In case petitioner is acquitted in the criminal case instituted for the same charge, the respondents are directed to re-consider the case of the petitioner for reinstatement. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)