IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2887 of 2006 DASHRATH RAM @ DASRATH . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 05. 15.09.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the only issue surviving is with regard to the services being made pensionable. The direction that followed in L.P.A. No. 407 of 2002 was for an enquiry under the Rules, who had opted for the pensions scheme and who had opted for the C.P.F. scheme. The records of the Municipality were found wanting. Subsequently, across the Board decision has been taken by the Municipality to pay pension to all its employees by a resolution. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a Grade-IV employee. The necessary con-commitment of the order of the Division Bench was to pay pension. The petitioner may not be relegated to fresh proceedings. The decision taken by the Municipality across the Board to make the services pensionable is after disposal of L.P.A. itself. There was no direction in the L.P.A. to pay pension. It is therefore not possible for this Court to proceed further in the contempt jurisdiction. 2 If so advised, the petitioner may prefer his remedies in a fresh Forum and/or by representation. The application stands disposed. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)