1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1268 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1128 OF 2010 Mrs.Vatsala Vijay Pandhare ..Applicant V/s. Madhukar Namdeo Raut & ors ..Respondents Mr.V.B.Rajure, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr.Sumeet Khaire i/b.Mr.P.N.Joshi, Advocate, for the Respondents CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 6TH MAY, 2010 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant and the learned Counsel for the Respondents. The Applicant is the original Respondent No.20 in the Writ Petition. If the prayer clause (a) of this Application is granted, it will virtually amount to finally deciding the Writ Petition in which rule has been issued. While issuing rule this Court has permitted the present Applicant to file appropriate proceeding for establishing her 2 rights. Moreover, since the Applicant is not a party to the pending suit, the decree passed in the suit will not be binding on the Applicant. Subject to what is observed above, no case is made out for vacating the interim relief. Application is rejected. (A.S.OKA, J.)