1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2434 OF 2011 (Kum. Manisha B. Sangle vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. AUGUST 26, 2011. Heard Shri Moon, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mrs. Taiwade, learned AGP for respondent No. 1, Shri Parchure, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 & 3. Nobody appears for respondent No. 4, though served. It is apparent that had name of the father of the petitioner Bhanudasrao been written in vernacular, the error could not have occurred. The error also is not very material. The alphabet “a” after letters “Bh” is missing in the certificate issued by Respondents No. 2 & 3. Shri Parchure, learned counsel points out that time limit, within which such correction can be permitted, has already expired. However, we do not wish to go into that controversy as correction sought is not material and does not cause any prejudice to anybody. As already noted above, had that name been written in Marathi, there 2 could not have been any error. In this situation, without creating any precedent, we direct Respondents No. 2 & 3 to correct the spelling error by inserting alphabet “a” in the spelling of “Bhanudasrao” in the certificate and Mark- Sheet issued to the petitioner for passing Higher Secondary Examination (XII Examination) in March 2005. The petitioner is directed to submit the original Mark-Sheet and certificate along with a copy of this order to Respondent No. 2 within a period of three weeks from today. Respondent No. 2 shall comply with the order within a further period of two weeks and the petitioner shall thereafter collect back the documents from the office of Respondent No. 2. Writ Petition is thus allowed. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.