IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9508 of 2011 Date of Decision: May 26, 2011 Dharam Pal & others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioners. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents not to auction lease rights in the land that has been reserved for holding Mela in the village under the Consolidation Scheme (Annexure P-1). 2. On a query of the Court, learned counsel has not been able to state as to when Mela is scheduled to be held. Infact, no particulars have been given in the petition to say that in the recent past any Mela was held in the village or that in the near future, any CWP No.9508 of 2011 [2] Mela is scheduled which cannot be held because land is sought to be auctioned. 3. Other than the above, auction notice has not been placed on record to enable this Court to conclude that there has been any violation of the Consolidation Scheme. The pleadings in the petition are highly vague and irresponsible. 4. No ground for interference in exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction is made out. 5. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) May 26, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?