”é / iN THE HIGH COURT OF JU'DICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH ‘p/ Lot” C w.P. No./é/ g OF 2001 ,K/ wa/Smt. Sandhya Lingam, W/o Shri Michael Lingam, aged about 38 years, Assistani Grade-H, Tribal Office, COHectorate, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (Chhattisgarh) PETITIONERS Versus RESPONDENTS 1/ y tate of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of Tribai Welfare, Mantralaya, D. K. Bhawan Raipur (Chhattisgarh) . Collector (Tribal), Sarguja at Ambikapur (Chhattisgarh) 3x Additional Collector and Project Administrator, lntegratecl Tribal Development Project, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (Chhattisgarh) 4. Assistant Project Administrator, integrated Tribal Development Project, Ambikapur District Surguja (Chhattisgarhf WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 OF THE CONsTITUTlON OF INDIA XI—HC-22 XJ/ w W mam wwgwkeagxnLW1 200 WW mam m WWW WWW}?1%€I®ER WW . éiamm 11.9.2001 z i Mr.Prashant Mishrqi for the petitioner. This writ petitioner has been transferred « to some other place. The only apprehension of‘ the \ wri‘f: petitioner is that :;he might become surplus. There is no apprehension as regards pay and allowances and also as regards status. Shri Gautam Bhaduri,learned counsel for the State states that the apprehension of p. the writ petitioner is rut founded. There is no material on record to show that t1e petitioner shall become surplus. In my view as lnng as there is security of @QX@ her employment and as long’as sheyiszpaid herb»: a normal salary and a'llOwance to which she is legally entitled and alsoas long as her status is protected, the order of trans£er as such can not be assailed. According to Mr.Mishra the order of ”transfer is con- trary to the circular i sued @o by the competent autho- rity by which the order of transfer is in fact banned. Shri Bhaduri subiréits that in the administrative exigency of service theé order of transfer has been issued and as such this arrangement can not be inter- l fered wi th . “1.2 ? WWw§ww gamma ' After consider in petition and also, the o 20.8.2001 and after hea sides,I am not inclined 0f transfer . the light af the observat In the result, in g the averments in the writ rder of transfer issued on king counsel for both the to interfere with the order .made above this petitic n is ciisposed of. Vi ‘ sdl- 3 A Chief JPVSVFiwV 7 v s r w V. ivqrergs ‘ i