IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 21255 of 2008 Date of Decision: 25.8.2009. Ajit --Petitioner Versus Union of India and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Jagbir Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Geeta Singhwal, C.G.S.C for respondents. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) In response to the advertisement issued by the respondents for recruitment to the post of Constable (General Duty) for Himachal Pradesh and Chandigarh, the petitioner applied for his recruitment. He appeared in physical test and also the written test and has secured 31 marks. He was considered as a candidate from Himachal Pradesh. The petitioner had applied for consideration as the candidate belonging to the State of Himachal Pradesh. The last selectee in the State of Himachal Pradesh secured 47 marks and thus the petitionercould not be selected. The petitioner has accordingly filed this petition seeking a direction that he may be considered against Chandigarh quota as he claims to be eligible for that. In the reply filed, it is stated that the last selectee against the Chandigarh quota has secured 32 marks and the petitioner is not even entitled for selection/recruitment against that quota. Without commenting upon the right of the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as the petitioner has not been able to secure marks in any of the quota. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 25.8.2009 lucky