IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26592 of 2011 Radhey Shyam Paswan @ Sittu Paswan Versus The State Of Bihar 2/ 08.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Prayer has been sought in the Trial Court under the provision of 437(6) of Cr. P.C., that is refused on the ground that petitioner’s prayer was rejected by this Court (High Court) may not be a ground for refusal of bail. Hence, Trial Court is directed to decide the petitioner’s prayer afresh if prayer is so made on his behalf for bail under Section 437(6) of Cr. P.C. without being prejudiced by any of the refusal orders of this Court. With the above observation, this application is disposed of. Let the order be communicated through Fax at the cost of petitioner in connection with Gopalganj P.S. Case No. 298 of 2008 (Tr. No. 3818 of 2011) in the Court of J.M., Gopalganj. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)