IN THE HIGH COU RT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34201 of 2010 SHAILESH KUNWAR @ SHAILESH PRASAD KUNWAR S/O SHRI SUDAMA KUNWAR…………………………………………………… ……….…PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 09.11.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is brother of complainant’s husband alleged for torture for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry having similar allegation rather more specific, his parents are allowed anticipatory bail by this Court vide Cri. Misc. No.4219 of 2010 dated 08.3.2010. Petitioner’s prayer for bail has been refused by the learned Sessions Judge finding his involvement in marrying of the husband with another lady, if that is accepted then only bailable offences are made out that also about having conspiracy for the same. Petitioner’s refusal of anticipatory bail is not justified. Husband is yet to appear or apprehend. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial 2 Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Gopalganj P.S. Case No.195 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)