4 IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.3836 OF 2007 NO.3836 OF 2007 NO.3836 OF 2007 Kailas Vasantrao Ghule & Anr. .. Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.P.L.Bhujbal for the petitioner. Ms.V.Mhaispurkar, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr.R.M.Hardas for respondent No.4. Mr.Bhadrashete for respondent Nos.5 to 7. CORAM CORAM CORAM : R.M. SAVANT, J. : R.M. SAVANT, J. : R.M. SAVANT, J. (VACATION (VACATION (VACATION JUDGE) JUDGE) JUDGE) DATE DATE DATE : 14TH MAY, 2007. : 14TH MAY, 2007. : 14TH MAY, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The present petition filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 7th April, 2007 passed by the Collector, Nashik rejecting the Election Objection No.84 of 2007 and 85 of 2007 filed by the present petitioner as regards the ensuing elections of the Nashik District Central Co-Operative Bank. The four objections raised by the petitioner have been very appropriately dealt with by the Collector in the order passed by him. I see no illegality or infirmity in the order passed by the Collector. 2. However, it is made clear that in case the petitioner feels aggrieved as regards any of the issues raised in the petition, the petitioner would be at liberty : 2 : to file an Election Dispute after the elections are over. 3. It is also made clear that any observations made in this order would not come in the way of the petitioner while prosecuting the said remedy. 4. Petition is dismissed. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. SAVANT, J.) SAVANT, J.) SAVANT, J.)