IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3725 of 2009 SUNIL KUMAR CHAUDHARY @ SUNIL CHAUDHARY son of Kapildeo Chaudhary, resident of village Barun, P.S.Barun, District Aurangabad … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Shri Rajni Kant Pandey For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta, APP ----------- 2. 29.1.2009 Heard. The contention is that the petitioner could not get trail in spite of framing of the charges on 7.8. 2008. If one could peruse the orders passed on 7.8.2008 and 26.8.2008, copies of which have been pro vided by the petitioner in this petition, one could find that the charges were framed on 7.8.2008 before the date on which the case was to come up before the court and, as such, the Presiding Officer directed the production of the witnesses on the date which had already been fixed and on that particular date, i.e., 26.8.2008 the lower court was moved with a prayer for bail. Thus, it is quite clear that the court had no opportunity even for a day to seek production of the witnesses. 2 The petitioner is dismissed. The lower court could take its own time in concluding the trial of the petitioner. Kanth ( Dharnidhr Jha, J.)