1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 81 OF 2010 Jaideo Harishchandra Raut Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. P. S. O. Hingna Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Shri S. P. Bhandarkar Adv for applicant. Shri Fulzele APP for State/respondents. CORAM: A. P. BHANGALE J. Dated: 17 th FEBRUARY, 2010. Although accusations are serious as against applicant it is sought to be defended on the ground that he was not at Nagpur on the date of occurrence and in fact he sought to tender railway ticket to show that he was not in Nagpur and could not have been involved in the alleged murder as also destruction of evidence in respect of the same. Considering these submissions this Court had directed the applicant to furnish particulars of his address and proposed 2 surety. Accordingly by precipe he proposed two sureties who were enquired with by police to their satisfaction. Under these circumstances I am inclined to grant conditional bail in favour of the applicant. Applicant shall be released on bail in Crime No. 40/09 under Section 302, 201 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code on executing P. R. bond in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- with two or more sureties in the like amount with further condition that applicant shall not tamper with prosecution evidence in any manner. He shall inform to the Investigating Officer his fixed address with phone/cell number (if any) including the names and addresses of his sureties with their phone/cell numbers and shall communicate change therein if any, in future. He shall not commit any crime while on bail and shall attend trial Court on each date of hearing. Application stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE svk 3 4 5 6