iliai!-.,,iwlilili HIGH COIIRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PVR PET1TIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETmON (S) No. 3642 of2008 Kamal Na-ayan Dewangan, aged 47 yeara, Son of Late SSiri Mahanaiid Dewuigau, 4ssi^aat Gt'ade- IU, Collectorate, Durg, Distt. Diwg(GXj.) .•;'VERSm';;,C.:.:'' '::'::."': .'^ :.: : 1. State Govemment of Chhafflisgarii Throu^i Avar Secretaiy, Rajaswa & ApdffPraBandhMiDepartiiwBt, Minisby, D.K.8. Bhawaii, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Colleetot,Durg(C.&) " WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTKLE 226 QF THE CONSTITUTIQN QF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri.J. Present: ghriAjayShiivastava,Advocatefeirfhepetitioner.;;t Shri Y.S.Tliakiu-, Deputy Advocate General fortiie State/ respondents. OKALORUER (Passed on 18B1 day of July, 2( 8) ; 1. Wilfa Ihe conseirt ofthe parties, the matteris taken uptbr hearing finally. 2. Leamed eounsel Empearing fw the petitioner subnrite that as per ctause (6) ofthe policy dated 29 May, 2008 (Amiexure P/2), an empkyeff o^.distoict cadre caimot be transfenred to other disbrict. The in^ugned transfer onter dated 30.06.2008 (Amiexure P/l) has been passed without considering clause (6) ofthe policy dated 29 May, 2008. The petitioner doesnct watiltb ecaisst I}M! matter on merits at this stage, however, tfae petitioner seelss pemuss»noflfais Eourt to make renresentation to the aulhorities eoncemed, wfaiA may be considered and decided as expeditiously as possible, ca its ownmerits. 3. ShriThakur.leamedcounselappearingfwtherespondent—Statesubmitsthatm the event, a representation is made within aperiod ofthree days, the sane shall be considered in accordance with clause (6) ofthe polie}' dated 29*^ May, 2008, within a period oftwo weeks. Shri ThakuriurthersubnMts.&attiilttiedisposal Qftherepresentation, no coenav®ste{«shall b& taken. > ' 4. In view of the foregoing, according to teamed coimsel appearing tbr the petitiQnei\Hothmgsurwvesinthematter. «? - 5. Accordingly, Ihe petition is disposed of. No order asto costs. A3EU Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge