3-SST ^i|A||(r>A|, <?Tflwi<o, fsf^l'yy VWvtt *NI* GSTI+. -f^ sn^r ?ii R-tH tW '3TT^?T Sft<Mlcti 31RRT TRq? (Ipf^gqtT) rs- (^- "iff^ 200 ^<irar ^fOT sii^i Petitioner ResDondents 1. (pamenlai Mandavi, S/o Shri Jagduram 1/iandavi, agsd about 45 years, Rura! Worticulturai Development Officer, R/o FJ|lfl/l<a ndi/ar<£jjr Pnct KaniiijrlrsKsa Tahdi til»ngi^ to^'w »iwit •***•>) • tir-w* i v*»*»m i ir^"h*] t l/t >wit ^mbagarh Chowki, District Rajnandgaon (ISG). -Versus- I.S.C.S. Rao, Director, Agricultural porticurtura! Development Kamhi qstate, A-7, Raipur (CG). Sinale Bench : Hod 104-2007 Shri Anoop Mazumdar, c< Heard. The Detitioner has mol/ed respondents praying that proc< their willful disobedience of thisl W.P.No.238/2006. Perusal of the order the said order without expressin^ petitioner was directed to makel directed to decide the same wittiin dateti +I^T<r1-4l'l 'qpRrf '^.1^^ <f<f|-^i< ^?3ifim3ii^?i ardih, ViP Tiwari, Assistant Director, Horticulture Qepartment, Rajnandgaon (CG). (presently posted as Assistant Director, jorticuiture Departmsnt Janjgir-Champa, qistrict Champa. ble Shri Justice L.C.Shadoo unsel forthe petitioner. this contempt petition aaainst the edings may be initiated against them for Court's order dated 17-1 -20W oassed in 17-1-2006 reveals that the Court passed anyopinion on the merits ofthe case, the representation and the respondents were two months. It was further directed that XI-HG—78 3~EST '^WW-tf, W^\W16, [si'ftWy, /r KIHMI *<<|cb "WI, 200 an^yr ^ra? (^pfyRff) SII^T JKI !S(-<icb WIT aii^si gnhi' TCITW ^lfel SII^T -'L' order the petitioner should not be petition was disposed of. The In para 3 of the contemifrt petitioner was allowed to conltinue 17-1-2006. Thereafter the petiti<>ner but he was not allowed to ioin. A.Aoos^ to vte?t contempt has been contempt petition is liable to be ^ <^Tii[fi*i1t *(l*i<n? ^'f^'st' <Fnt$R, ^T STfilH Stl^I r41ieved tilt the next date of hearing. The itself is ambiguous. petition it has been mentioned that the in compliance of the order dated fell sick and he joined on 12-2-2007, 'he petitioner has not been able to show as corfimitted by the respondents, therefore, the jismissed and it is hereby dismissed. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge E'. 1-