IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 14TH JULY 2011 / 23RD ASHADHA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 90 of 2011(S) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------- SATHYAN, S/O. SREEDHARAN, AGED 53 YEARS, VANIYAPPILLI HOUSE, KURUVILASSERY.P.O, THRISSUR - 680 735. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.DHANIL. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. SHAJI, S/O. KUNJITTY, PERUKUDIYIL HOUSE, KOMBICHAL DESOM, MELOOR.P.O, THRISSUR - 680 311. 2. SUJITH, S/O. RAMAKRISHNAN, AGED 26 YEARS, CHENATHUNADU DESOM, NEAR GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL, CHALAKUDY, CHALAKUDY.P.O, THRISSUR - 680 307. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KORATTY POLICE STATION, KORATTY.P.O, THRISSUR - 680 308. 4. DY. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, IRINAJALAKUDA, P.O. IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR - 680 121. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR -2. 6. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-10. W.P.(CRL.). NO.90/2011-S: 7. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. R1 BY ADVS. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN, SRI.RAJAN VELLOTH, SRI.SAIJO HASSAN, SRI.PRATHAP PILLAI, SRI.BENOJ C AUGUSTIN, SRI.SEBIN THOMAS, R3 TO R7 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.M. KAMMAPPU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(CRL.). NO.90/2011-S: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBIT: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE F.I.R. FILED BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, CHALAKUDY. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ----------------------------------- W.P(Crl.).No.90 OF 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 14th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,J. Following earlier orders, we see the statement dated 30.6.2011 placed on record by the investigating officer, who is handling the further proceedings on the basis of Ext.P1 FIR registered by the Koratty police. It relates to the man missing of Smt.Seema, daughter of the petitioner. The first respondent is her husband. The investigation tends to reveal certain aspects, including some sort of a conduct or relationship between the missing person and one Sujeesh, going by the statement of the Sub Inspector of Police. We are also told that look out notices have been issued and information has been given through the television channels also. With all this, we are satisfied that there is no reason to think that the quality of the investigation is not proper and at WPCR.90/11 2 any rate, it is not necessary for us to retain this matter on the ground that there is illegal detention. We, therefore, order this matter directing that respondents 3 to 6 will ensure that the investigation into the case registered as per Ext.P1 FIR is vigorously pursued. If the petitioner has any further complaint about any laxity in the investigation, he may bring his such apprehension to the notice of the 5th respondent for further relief. He may, if so advised, move the jurisdictional Magistrate in terms of the law laid by the Apex Court in Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P. [2007 (13) SCALE 693]. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- K.SURENDRA MOHAN, Judge. kkb.14/7.