AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8180 OF 2004 Ravindra Maruti Gujar ... Petitioner Vs. The District and Sessions Judge, Kolhapur & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. M.S. Topkar for the petitioner. Mr. Masurkar, Government Pleader with Ms. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the State. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. DATED : MARCH 25, 2008. P.C.:- 1. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. We have also heard learned Government Pleader. Learned Government Pleader, on instructions from Mr. V.L. Patil, Deputy Registrar (Legal), High Court, Mumbai who is present in the court, states that whenever regular vacancies have to be filled in, the petitioner will be considered, taking into account his five years' AJN 2 Annual Confidential Reports preceding the date of vacancy. This statement is accepted. Out attention is drawn to Annexure E to the reply. Relevant clause III on page 2 thereof, reads thus : “III) Thereafter, he was warned for keeping Rs.210/- the amount of fine for the day on 18/7/1994. After the representation which was made by him to the High Court, the Hon. High Court directed that the entry of the said warning be not taken in the service book.” 2. If the High Court has directed that the entry of the warning should not be taken into the service book, the respondents shall abide by it. The petition is disposed of in the aforestated terms. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.]