IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1159 OF 2003 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.S.P.Thorat for the petitioner Mr.Rahul Kate for the respondent nos.8 &9 CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : AUGUST 3,2009 P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for respondent nos.8 and 9. Rest of the respondents have been served with the notice. 2 Preliminary objection is raised that the order of dismissal of the restoration application as against some of the respondents will be an appealable order under clause (c) of Rule 1 of Order XLIII of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908, 3 The contention of the petitioners is that they were not granted time to file reply to the application at Exh.19. Apart from the remedy of Appeal, the petitioners can always take out appropriate application before the trial court for restoration as against the concerned respondents. 4 In view of availability of remedies, writ petition is not entertained and the same is disposed by keeping all the contentions and all remedies of the petitioners open. JUDGE