IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH JUNE 2009 / 27TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 15693 of 2009(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. KUTTISANKARA GUPTAN, S/O.APPU GUPTAN, AGED 63 YEARS, VALAPPILTHODY, NEAR OLD KATAMPAZHIPURAM SRO, KATAMPAZHIPURAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. SREEKANTH V., S/O.KUTTISANKARA GUPTAN, AGED 27 YEARS, VALAPPILTHODY, NEAR OLD KATAMPAZHIPURAM SRO, KATAMPAZHIPURAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE HOME SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAKKAD. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SREEKRISHNAPURAM POLICE STATION, SREEKRISHNAPURAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 4. RAJEEV, S/O.A.P.KUTTAN, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RAMA BHAVAN VEEDU, KATAMPAZHIPURAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 5. INDIRA GUPTAN, W/O.A.P.KUTTAN, RAMA BHAVAN VEEDU, KATAMPAZHIPURAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI. P.A. SALIM. ADV. SRI.N.RAGHURAJ FOR R4 & R5 SRI.A.V.RAVI FOR R4 & R5 SMT.K.AMMINIKUTTY FOR R4 & R5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC. 15693 OF 2009. APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT. P1 : A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 4.6.2009 FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3. P.R. RAMAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 15693 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of June, 2009. JUDGMENT Raman, J, We have already passed an interim order on 8.6.2009. In the light of the said order, we do not find that any further order need be passed in this case except to make the same absolute. The party respondents, however, after entering appearance through counsel submitted that the allegations are not true and correct. But in view of our specific order that the complaint be enquired into and only if it is found to be true, police protection need be afforded. We do not think it necessary to go into the merits of the case. The writ petition is closed. P.R. Raman, Judge P. Bhavadasan, Judge sb.