1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.20 OF 2010 (UMAKANT TUKARAM PANDE...VS.. STATE OF MAH. DEPTT. OF EDUCATION & 4 OTH.) AND WRIT PETITION NO.4906 OF 2009. (SHRIKANT D. GANORKAR...VS.. STATE OF MAH.DEPTT. OF EDUCATION & 4 OTH.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Vishal Anand, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri S.J.Jichkar, A.G.P. for Respondents. CORAM : S.A.BOBDE & SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK , JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 04, 2010. 1. The petitioners have filed these petitions for direction to the respondents to transfer them from Gadchiroli to any other place of their choice. 2. Shri Anand, learned counsel for the petitioners frankly admitted the statement made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader Shri Jichkar that the petitioners have approached the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal in regard to the same subject matter and that the said fact has not been mentioned in the petition. 3. However, Shri Anand, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the petitioners have approached the 2 Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal due to failure of the respondents to decide their representations. According to the learned counsel, now, the petitioners are seeking a positive direction to the respondents that they should be transferred. 4. We are of the view that since the subject matter of the two proceedings is same, the petitioners were duty bound in law to disclose the earlier proceedings while filing petitions in this Court. In these circumstances, we are not inclined to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction at the instance of the petitioners. Hence, both the petitions are dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE RR..