••(.. HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH, BILASPUR W.P.jSS Ho. 4SS8/2G07 Petitioner 2. 3. Ramkiiinar Ram, s/o Shri Janki Ram aged about 59 years, R/o Raruaiiujganj, Post Ramanujgam, District-Surguja(CO) Dii State of Cbhattisgarh, Through: Secretar}r, Revenue Departnient, DKS Bhan-an, Raipur, District RaipLir (CQ) Coflector, District-Siu-giija, District Surguja (CG) Comnussioner, Bhu-AbhileKh. Ciihattisgarh, Raipur, District- RaiourfCG^ WRIT PSTITIOH UiSDER ARTSCLE 226 OF THS CONSTI7UTIO?i OE- !?iDIA Shri N.K.Mehta, coiinsel for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panel l^awyer for the State on advance copy, $21.8.200'?) .<a£ ^Sa.ss.. ,J. Heard finallywitli the consent ofboth the partiea. The petitioner, who is working on flie post of Assistant. Giade-I) in the office nf S.D.0. RaTnannjganj has been transfen-ed froni RaiTiaTiiijganj to Janpad Panchayat, Surajpiir 1iy onier dated 22.7.2007 (Annexiu-e P-4) on administi-ativR groiinds. Refemng to theciociiments Annexiire P-1 as a1so AnDexiires P-8 & P-9, leanied counsel for tbe petitioner siAmits thaf date of birth of the petitioner is 2.7.1948, according to which, the petitioner is going to reth-p. on 31.7.2008. His contention is that accordiag to clause 7 of the traasfer policy dated 13th June, 2007, if a person is to iTp.tire witliin a period of 1 year, his case shall be sunita WPO-) 48592007 ^ovenied by the said clause of thc policy. He siihTnits that though few days ai'e exceeding fi'om 1 year, tooking to tlie pith and aubstance of the ti'ansfer policy, henefit should be extended to fhe petitioner. He refei-s to clause 7 oftlie tn^nsfer policy, which reads as under : "7 luFf (il'ti'ti'it T!TOt t^t 'i)'jlpi'ij"rt fK i"!'? 1 9^ giT Wi S1sr % ifS Sl ^^ T^ !§ra^ 3»;CT^aA Qrtjcif rfc fjS^ 4 T5W ©>Si"K ^•Ti' 'ilt WT3! ij'hlcb ijRi)^ $ 3HW' ggsF^ggT i" Having taeard leamed counael for the petitione.r, having gone tliroiigh the contents of writ petition and the contents of daiise 7 of the transfer poUcy, in the opinion of fllis G"<nrt, the ends of justice would hf serverl if the petitioner is directerS to fite a i-epresentation affore ttie conccmed authority, invoking provisioTis ofclause 7 of the policy, thoilgh fcw rtays are exceer1ing,and tte said aiitliority is ilirected to ilisposc of the same within the stipulated periort granted by fhis Co'iirt. Accordingly, ttais petition is disposed ofwitta a dii-ection ttaat if so advised, the petitioner may f3e a detailed rept-esentation before the concemed aiitTiority within a period 3 weeks fiom today along with a copy ofthis order and a copy ofwrit petition, raistng hjs grievaiice and if such a representation is f3ed, the concemed aufhority shafl dispose of flie same as eariy as possible prefei-ably within a period of 2 nionths from t.iie date of receipt of the said If is farther rlirected fhat in the meanwtafle, the petitioner shall not be relieved from the present p1ace of posting and shall be. aflowed to co'ntinue there. The petitioTi stauds finally disposed of. j Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge t