CWP No. 2392 of 2008 30.3.2010 Present:- Mr. A.K.Gupta, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. R.K.Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.K.Sharma, Addl. Advocate General and Mrs. Shubh Mahajan, Dy. Advocate General for the respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he has instructions not to press the petition on behalf of petitioner No.1. Accordingly, the petition is not pressed on behalf of petitioner No.1. He has also submitted that so far as petitioners No.2 to 10 are concerned, their case is covered by the judgment dated 21.12.2009 passed in CWP No. 2127 of 2008. This has not been disputed by Mr. R.K.Sharma, learned Senior Additional Advocate General and he has stated that the case of petitioners No. 2 to 10 is covered by the judgment dated 21.12.2009 passed in CWP No. 2127 of 2008. In these circumstances, the petition so far as petitioners No.2 to 10 are concerned, is allowed in terms of judgment dated 21.12.2009 in CWP No. 2127 of 2008 titled Mansha Ram and others Vs. State of H.P. and others. The claim of petitioner No.1 in the petition stands dismissed as not pressed. A copy of judgment dated 21.12.2009 be placed in the record of this case also. March 30, 2010. ( Kuldip Singh ) (GR) Judge.