IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 16TH JANUARY 2007 / 26TH PAUSHA 1928 WP(C).No. 1682 of 2007(A) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------------- RANI CHACKO, AGED 23, D/O. CHACKO, KARIMATHI HOUSE,SREEMOOLANAGARAM P.O. THEKKUMBHAGAM VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.S.VIDYASAGAR RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMBUZHA, KOTTAYAM-686560. 2. THE REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMBUZHA, KOTTAYAM-686560. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)NO.1682 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of January 2007 JUDGMENT Petitioner's complaint is that revaluation is not properly done by the University. According to the petitioner, details are not furnished by the University when there is no change in the mark in the revaluation. The subject for which petitioner sought revaluation is in English, where the marks obtained by petitioner is 19%. It is seen from Ext.P1 that petitioner has not secured any appreciable mark in any subject which shows the poor academic standard maintained by the petitioner. I do not find any anomaly in the result of the revaluation which is the same as original valuation. Eventhough petitioner's grievance is that result of revaluation is not intimated, Ext.P5 is the communication of the same and therefore this complaint is untenable. Writ petition is therefore devoid of any merit and it is dismissed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE jes