IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 28TH MARCH 2008 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 10674 of 2008(U) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- DAVARAM ALISTER BOSE, RETNA VILASAM, BUNGALOW, KALUMMUGHAM, THIRUPURAM P.O. BY ADV. SRI.R.GOPAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, K.S.E.B., ASSISTANT ENGINEER'S OFFICE, UCHAKKADA, POZHIYOOR, NEYYATTINKARA. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, COLLECTORATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. VILASINI, DAYA COTTAGE, KULATHOOR, NALLORR VATTOM, PLAMOOTTUKADU P.O., NEYYATTINKARA. R1 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI P.P. THAJUDEEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------------ W.P.C. No 10674 of 2008 ------------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 28th March 2008 JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner by filing this writ petition has essentially raised an objection to the drawal of line to supply energy for the third respondent. First respondent is therefore duty bound to take appropriate action for removal of that obstruction if the line is proposed to be drawn and the matter shall not be concluded by the appropriate District Magistrate or the Additional District Magistrate, as the case may be, without affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner particularly when there are civil cases pending between the petitioner and the third respondent. It is so ordered. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN Judge 28/03/2008 en [true copy]