IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 876 of 1998 Date of Decision: April 04, 2011 A. Sivalingam. …Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN Present: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K.K. Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4. Mr. Rohit Seth, Advocate for Mr. V.K. Arora, Advocate for respondent No.6. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the stand taken by the U.T. Administration in connected matter, namely, CWP No. 7716 of 1997, this petition will not survive for adjudication and has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly we dispose of this petition having been rendered infructuous. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (T.P.S. MANN) JUDGE April 4, 2011 Atul