IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAQL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3371 OF 2009 Sharad Suresh Cocasse .. Petitioner Vs Aprajita Cocasse and anr .. Respondents Mr. Prabhajit Jauhar i/b Mr Vasant Dhavan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.M.Nakhwa,APP, for the State. Mr Suresh Chandra Shekhar with Mrs Alisha Lambey i/b Lambey & Co. for respondent no.1. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE & A.R.JOSHI,JJ. DATE : 26/04/2010. PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has made the following prayer. : “(a) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of habeas corpus ordering and directing the respondent no.1 to produce before this Hon'ble Court children of petitioner, namely, (1) Prisha Cocasse (DOB 12th October, 2004) and Reema Cocasse (DOB 4th July, 2006), both American born citizens and hand over minor children, their physical and legal custody to the petitioner or his authorised representative in compliance of the order dated 26th March, 2009 passed by the District Court, Family Division, 3rd Judicial District, Country of Dodge, State of Minnesota, USA to enable the minor children to go back to USA; T (b) direct the respondent no.1 to hand over the requisite documents such as passports and other travel documents which are in her custody to the petitioner in order to facilitate the minor children to go back to USA; “ 3. We interviewed the parties jointly and individually in our chamber in the presence of their respective advocates. After several meetings, the learned counsel for the parties state that the parties have amicably settled their all disputes including the issue of custody and they have tendered Consent Terms duly signed by the parties and their advocates on record. Parties have also placed affidavits of the petitioner's mother Manju Suresh Cocasse, and of respondent no.1 stating that they never operated the Bank locker, standing in their joint name, ever since they opened it in August, 2005. The Consent Terms and the affidavits are taken on record and marked X, X-I and X-II for identification. We pass the order in terms of the Consent Terms. The undertakings given and the statements made in the Consent Terms by the parties are accepted. The statements made by the parties in the affidavits (X-I and X-II) are also accepted. 4. This Court, vide order dated 21.4.2010, had issued certain directions to the Bank and as per those directions the Bank was supposed to furnish history of operation of the locker standing in the names of Manju Cocasse and respondent no.1 Aprijita Cocasse. Counsel for the parties state that the Bank will furnish such details within next one week. In view thereof, we allow respondent no.1 to file appropriate proceedings to recover her Stridhan in the event it is found that the bank locker was operated by Manju Cocasse after it was opened on 23.8.2005. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that he has no objection for granting such liberty to respondent no.1. 5. The writ petition is disposed of. All concerned and the parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order. The parties are directed to act on the terms of the Consent Terms. (A.R.Joshi,J.) (D. B. Bhosale, J.)