IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40648 of 2009 SHANKAR PRASAD SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 07.01.2010 Heard. The allegation in the FIR is that seized liquor from a shop, which was supposed to retail in cold drinks, was supplied by the present petitioner. The petitioner is a licensee, there is no doubt about it, but the licence which is Annexure 2 to the present petition, does not have the place of vending from where the recovery is made. It is contended that other accused persons from whom recoveries have been made, have been admitted to bail and in the above view, the petitioner may surrender and pray for regular bail before the court below which shall be considered by it without being prejudiced by the fact that the petitioner had preferred application for grant of anticipatory bail up to this court. The petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation/direction. Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)