1 WP-7555-07.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7555 OF 2007 Rajeev Gupta and ors ..Petitioners Vs The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents -- Mr.Mahesh Menon, for petitioners. Ms.S.R.Kumbhat, for respondent no.2. Mr.A.Y.Sakhare, Senior Advocate i/b.Mr.Vinod Shinde, for respondent nos.5 and 6. Mr.V.A.Thorat, Senior Advocate i/b.Mr.Jitendra Sachdev, for respondent no.7. -- CORAM : D.K.DESHMUKH & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 2 nd AUGUST, 2011 P.C: The consent terms between the petitioners and respondent nos.4 to 7 duly signed by them and their lawyers are produced on record. The same are taken on record and marked as “X” for identification. It is a common ground between the petitioners’ advocate and advocate for respondent no.7 that the respondent no.7 has obtained Occupation Certificate and therefore, as provided by 2 WP-7555-07.odt Clause 14 of the consent terms, by consent of the petitioners and respondent nos.4 and 7, interim order is vacated. 2] The learned counsel for the petitioners states that there are certain commitments made by respondent no.7 which are recorded in the consent terms and time for fulfillment of those commitments will start from today. The learned counsel for respondent no.7 agrees to it. The undertakings given by respondent no.7 in the consent terms are accepted. [R.G.KETKAR, J.] [D.K.DESHMUKH, J.]