-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.636 OF 2004 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 373 OF 2002 IN SUIT NO.494 OF 1995 Murlidhar Lachmandas Adnani and others ...Plaintiffs. Vs. Shakuntala Shyam Mankani and others ...Defendants .... D.J.Mahimtura & Co. for Plaintiffs R.C.Dalal & Co. for Defendants .... CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR,J. CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR,J. CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR,J. DATE : JANUARY 11,2005 DATE : JANUARY 11,2005 DATE : JANUARY 11,2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Both the parties to the proceedings tender consent terms dated 11th January, 2005 duly signed by the parties and their advocates. Consent terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. Chamber Summons as well as Execution Application both stand disposed of in terms of consent terms. Undertaking given in the consent terms, accepted. 2. By consent of the parties, the office of the Prothonotary and Sr.Master, High Court Bombay, is directed to refund the amount lying deposited at the credit of the suit in favour of defendant nos.1 and 2 jointly. [ S.U.KAMDAR,J. ] -2-