IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 18TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 29788 of 2011(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- BINITHA BALAN, D/O. BALAN, AGED 23 YEARS, PAINUMMOOTTIL, EDAKADATHY.P.O, UNNIKUPPA, KOOTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. K.SHAJ SRI.SAJJU.S SRI.PRAVEEN THOMAS ABRAHAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. MAHATHMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATHMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. SC SRI.T.A.SHAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 29788 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT-P1- TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF THE PETITIONER FOR THE 3RD SEMESTER M.SC DEGREE EXAMINATION ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P2- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FORM FOR REVALUATION OF ANSWER BOOK DATED 06/06/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIOENR TO THE IST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P3- TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF REMITTANCE OF FEE FOR REVALUATION OF ANSWER BOOK DATED 06/06/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE IST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P4- TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF REMITTANCE OF FEE FOR SCRUTINY OF ANSWER BOOK DATED 06/06/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE IST RESPONDENT. /true copy/ sd/- P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).29788/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 9th day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioner applied for revaluation of the answer sheets in the 3rd semester M.Sc Electronics Examination, held in November, 2010 vide Ext.P2 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within six weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. 4.Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs