1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.15880/2010 Dinesh Mudgal Versus Raj. State Road Transport Corporation and anr. DATE OF ORDER --- December 03,2010 PRESENT HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE PREM SHANKER ASOPA Mr. Sandeep Saxena, for the petitioner BY THE COURT (1) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner (2) By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the second suspension order dated 07.08.2009 (Anx.3). (3) Submission of counsel for the petitioner is that against the aforesaid second suspension order dated 7.8.2009, the petitioner has submitted representation The petitioner has also applied for the Rules/Policy of the Corporation for revocation of the suspension vide his application dated 3.5.2010 under the Right to Information Act, 2005, in reply to which the respondent Corporation has given information under the Right to Information Act that for revocation of the suspension order, the Head of the Department/Zonal Manager has to consider the same considering the nature and merit of the case and as per his conscience. (4) Counsel further submits that the petitioner is desirous of filing a fresh representation against the second suspension order which has been passed after grant of sanction for prosecution on account of lodging of Criminal Case No.323/2007 in the Anti Corruption Department and the respondent Corporation may be further directed to decide the said representation. (5) The prayer appears to be reasonable. 2 (6) The petitioner is at liberty to file fresh representation within a period of fifteen days from today and the same shall be decided by the respondent Corporation within a period of one month thereafter. (7) The writ petition is disposed of, as indicated above. (Prem Shanker Asopa) J. गोpa ल