C^- '3^^^_ Ll IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISHGARH AT W.P. (S) No. BILASPUR (C.G.) s^ f 2010 ^ING^ PETITIONERS ... 1. Paras Ram Dewangan, aged 52 Year s/o Shri Mohan Lal Dewangan, Upper Division Teacher, Higher Secondary School, Umarwahi Block Chhuriya Distt. Rajnandgaon CG w .^ .^°/'$%. .^y ^w ^^- •:-y ^" -y 2. Rohidas Sahu, aged 50 years S/o late Shri Pranlal Sahu, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Umarwahi, Block Chhuriya, Distt Rajnandgaon C.G 3. Shyamlal Sahu, aged 50 years, S/o Jhumuklal Sahu, Asstt. T^cher, Govt. Primary School, Peti, Block Khairagarh Distt. Rajnandgaon VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State Government of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) x' 2. District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon. 3. BIock Education Officer, Chhuriya District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^ 4. Block Education Officer, Khairagarh District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUEOFWRlf OFMANDAMUS/DIRECTION OR ANYOTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. ^ H!GHCQURTQFCHHATTISGARH:BiLASP^^ WRiT PETiTION (S) N0. 59 OF 2010 PETETIONERS Paras Ram Dewangan & Others RESPONDENTS Versus State ©overnmentof Chhattisgarh & Others (Wrlt Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitutlon of Inciia) SingSe Bench : Hon*bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present > Shri Somkant Verma, counset for the petJtioners« Shri N.N. Roy, Panet Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on thls 8th day of January, 2010) 1. Wlth the consent of Searned coynsel appearlng for the partles, the petition is heard finaily. 2. The petltioners were appointed initiaily, on a fixed pay of Ra.100/-. The petltioners were thereafter, granted reguiar pay soale on compietion of the probation period. 3. The questlon of !aw involved herein is, asto whether the petitloners are entitied to reguSar pay scaSe w.eJ. the date of Initia! appointment or from the date of corTspietion of probation period. 4. Leamed counsei appearing for the parties jolntly. sybmlt that the faete and qyestlon of law, invoived in the present writ petltion, are simjiar to that W.P. (S) No.3566/2007 (Loknaffi Pat&l v. Siate of ChhatVasgarh & Oihers), which was ailowed by order dated 27-6-2007. 5. In view of foregoing submission by Itie tearned couns^S appearing for the parties, the wrlt petition is disposed of in the sanfie terms J»e. the petstloners are entitied for regular pay scate w.eJ, the date of inltsat appointment, subject to verlfjcatJon of facts. Gowri Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge