IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.45 of 2010 1. DEV NANDAN MODI S/O LATE RAMESHWAR LAL MODI R/O MOHALLA- KANTIYA BAZAR, P.O. AND P.S.- HAVELI KHARAGPUR, DISTT.- MUNGER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE DIRECTOR, G.P.F., PATNA BHAWAN, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, MUNGER, DISTT.- MUNGER 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, MUNGER, DISTT.- MUNGER 5. THE HEADMASTER, HIGH SCHOOL BAIJALPUR, P.O.- GOBADDA, HAVELI KHARAGPUR, DISTT.- MUNGER ----------- 3/ 12.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. No counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State despite giving time for the purpose. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon superannuation from the post of Assistant Teacher on 30th June 2005 from High School, Baijalpur, P.O. Gobadda, Haveli Kharagpur, District Munger, the full amount of G.P.F. has not been paid which would appear on the verification of the P.F. account furnished by the petitioner as per his letter dated 25.09.2009 , as contained in Annexure-2. Learned counsel for the State submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims the petitioner shall file fresh representation before respondent no.3, annexing the relevant chart in order to demonstrate that the full amount of provident fund dues BTiwary/ of the petitioner is not paid. In case the petitioner files representation within three weeks, respondent no.3 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The grievance of the petitioner raised in the representation, if filed, could be disposed of without further delay and the admitted dues on the verification of the relevant records shall also be paid with statutory interest. However, if the claim of the petitioner is not found payable, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reason for the same. In the above circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to file a fresh representation. With the aforesaid observation/ direction, the writ application stands disposed of. ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J )