IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16709 of 2010 MITHLESH PRASAD S/O SRI RAMUDIT PRASAD, R/O VILL-NASRATPUR P.S. DHANARUA IN THE DIST OF PATNA….PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THRU ITS SECRETARY FOOD AND SUPPLY DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR. 2. THE FOOD COMMISSIONER, GOVT. OF BIHAR. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PATNA. 4. THE SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, MASAURHI, PATNA. 5. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, DHANARUA, PATNA. 6. THE SUPPLY OFFICER, DHANARUA, MASAUDHI, PATNA. 7. THE MARKETING OFFICER, DHANARUA IN THE DISTRICT OF PATNA. ----------- 02/ 04-Oct-2010 Heard the parties in respect of this public interest litigation. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Government agency have not acted promptly and properly in making available food grains under different programmes such as Antyodaya Ann Yojna and B. P. L. Yojna. 3. It will not be proper for this Court to interfere with regular and usual administrative functions of the State Government. If there are lapses in the working of the concerned department or the authorities, the petitioner will be at liberty to approach 2 the office of Lokayukta or the Human Rights Commission if the affected family are facing deprivation. 4. This writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. perwez ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)