IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8215 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.R.TRIPATHI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : YES 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- RAGHUVIRSING JAVANSINH JALA Versus DIRECTOR, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCEMARKET COMMITTEE -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR VS PANDYA for Petitioners MR RK MISHRA for Respondent No. 1 DS AFF.NOT FILED (R) for Respondent No. 2 MR DILIP B RANA for Respondent No. 3, 4, 5 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.R.TRIPATHI Date of decision: 04/05/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT #. This court issued rule on 28.10.99. Today when the matter is called out Mr.Mishra, tenders an affidavit in reply which is filed in CA No.1521/2000. Mr.Mishra, request that the same can be treated as an affidavit in reply filed in the main petition also. It is stated in the said affidavit in reply that the petitioners in the said Spl.C.A. are already regularised. The grievance of the petitioners does not survive. The petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Interim relief granted earlier stands vacated. kks