IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1091 of 2007 MD.ZAKARIA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 24.6.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is the informant of Sabour P.S.Case No. 15 of 2004 appertaining to Sessions Case No. 58 of 2005/Trial No. 760 of 2006 which ended in acquittal of the two F.I.R. named accused persons under judgment dated 14.6.2007. This revision application is directed against the said judgment of acquittal dated 14.6.2007. Learned counsel for the petitioner assails the finding of acquittal on the ground that ignoring the oral testimony of the five prosecution witnesses the court below has erroneously acquitted the two accused persons. Having perused the impugned judgment dated 14.6.2007 it appears to me that the prosecution witnesses have been disbelieved in the light of the evidence of the Investigating Officer who categorically stated in his evidence that the case set forth by the prosecution witnesses in court was not deposed before him under Section 161 Cr.P.C. and the court below relying upon the testimony of the Investigating Officer acquitted the two accused persons, in the circumstances, I do not see any illegality in the impugned judgment and the revision application is, accordingly, dismissed. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha,J.)