:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.7 OF 2007 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.7 OF 2007 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.7 OF 2007 M/s. B. Vrajlal & Co. ..Applicant. v. Shri Vijay Gupta & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.P.S.Dani, adv. for the Applicants. Ms.Deepa Chavan i/b Navdeep Vora & Associates , adv. for the Respondent No.1. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 9th January, 2008. DATE: 9th January, 2008. DATE: 9th January, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicants. He has taken me through the pleadings of the plaintiffs/respondents and the impugned order. Plaintiffs filed civil suit claiming that they have exclusive right to run the business of weigh-bridge in the MIDC area and that the defendants do not have right and that they are illegally carrying on commercial activity or business of weigh-bridge on the land obtained from MIDC for industrial purpose. With this contention, the plaintiffs sought declaration that the function of commercial activity over the weigh-bridge of the defendant nos. 1 to 9 is illegal and the defendant nos.1 to 9 may be restrained from carrying on business. The defendant no.3/applicant before this Court made an application under Section 9A contending that the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit in view :2: of the provisions of 148 and 149 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act and the question of jurisdiction be decided. After hearing the parties, the learned trial Court rejected the application observing that under the provisions of M.R.T.P. Act relied upon by the defendants, jurisdiction of the Civil Court is not completely barred. In the present matter, the plaintiff has come to the Court seeking reliefs in respect of his alleged civil right against the defendants. Whether he has got such a right or not will have to be decided by the Civil Court. By no provision of law jurisdiction of the Civil Court is barred from taking cognisance of the claim of the plaintiff. After going through the impugned order, I am convinced that there is no merit in the present revision application. 2. Revision Application stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)