IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15660 of 2009 UMA SHANKAR BHAGAT @ UMA KANT BHAGAT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 22.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under section 392 of the Penal Code, to which section 411 of the Penal Code was added later on . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the first information report is against one unnamed and two named accused persons including the petitioner, but no incriminating article has been recovered from his possession and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the stolen motor- cycle has been recovered from the possession of co-accused Ranjeet Paswan, whereas, mobile has been recovered from the possession of Arun Paswan and both of them have been enlarged on bail on the orders of this Court dated 25.04.2008 and 29.08.2007 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 47516/2007 and 26124/2007, respectively. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. Accordingly, let the sole petitioner, namely, Uma Shankar Bhagat alias Uma Kant Bhagat be enlarged on bail on executing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial 2 Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 209/2006. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )