IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Review No. 76 of 2010 Date of decision: June 13, 2011 Nand Kishore Garg Petitioner Versus Punjab National Bank and others Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge For the Petitioner: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate ___________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The first respondent in the L.P.A. (writ petitioner) is the petitioner in the review petition. According to the review petitioner, the benefit under 30% reserved quota for promotion to JMG Grade-I, which was granted to him in the year 1997, should have been granted in the year 1993. We are afraid, it is not a ground for review and in any case, it is premature for the review petitioner to contend so. In the judgment, at paragraph 5, this Court had made it clear that the petitioner should be considered for promotion against 30% quota at the appropriate time and in case, any mistake has been committed in the process, steps for rectification thereof should be taken. Therefore, it is for the review petitioner to approach the bank itself seeking rectification of the mistake, if any, and if still aggrieved, it will be open for him to pursue his remedy in 2 appropriate proceeding. Without prejudice to such liberty, the review petition is disposed of. The pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( Justice Kurian Joseph ), Chief Justice June 13, 2011 (K) ( Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge