IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 28TH JUNE 2007 / 7TH ASHADHA 1929 WA.No. 137 of 2001(D) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.28913/2000 .................... APPELLANT: ----------- K.BALACHANDRAN, PHARMACIST, GOVT. HOMEO DISPENSARY, MANKAVU, KOZHIKODE-673 007 BY ADV. SRI.P.SANJAY RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, TRIVANDRUM. 2. DIRECTOR OF HOMEOPATHY DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM-695 023 3. DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER (HOMEOPATHY), IIIRD FLOOR, NEW BLOCK CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE -673 020 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER BENNY GERVACIS THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANTONY DOMINIC, JJ ------------------- W.A.137/2001 -------------------- Dated this the 28th day of June, 2007 JUDGMENT K.S.Radhakrishnan, J. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. This appeal is preferred against the judgment in O.P.No.28913/2000. O.P was preferred for a writ of certiorari to quash Exts.P6 and P10 orders. 3. Appellant was imposed with the punishment of censure on the ground that he had not routed the representation through the proper channel. Appellant submits and the imposition of censure would affect his future promotion and also affect his other monitory benefits. The learned Single Judge has clearly stated in the judgment that “the imposition of censure will not in any way affect the incumbent concerned, as it is made clear that it will not have an adverse effect even for considering the petitioner for further promotions. Therefore, the petitioner will not be affected by imposition of that penalty”. W.A.137/2001 2 4. In the above circumstances, we find that there is no infirmity in the order passed by the learned Single Judge and accordingly the appeal is dismissed. K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN Judge ANTONY DOMINIC Judge mrcs