IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 563 (MS) OF 2006 Surendra Singh and others. ………Petitioners. Versus State of Uttaranchal and others. ……………Respondents. Mr. P.C. Jhingan, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned counsel for the respondents. 13th August, 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 20.1.2006 passed by the respondent no. 4 in Second Appeal No. 7 of 2004-05 contained in Annexure No. 3 to the writ petition 2. A perusal of the order dated 20.1.2006 passed by the respondent no. 4 shows that it is a remand order, whereby the order passed by the orders of the courts below have been set aside and the matter has been remanded to the appellate Court. 3. Since, writ petition is against the remand order, therefore, I am not inclined to interfere with the same under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 4. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. (P.C. Verma, J.) 13.8.2008 Rathour