In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. R.S.A.No. 1166 of 2007 (O&M) Decided on April 19,2007 Asha Rani --Appellant. vs. Krishan Lal and others -- Respondents. Present: Ms. Puja Chopra,Advocate,for the appellant. Pritam Pal,J:(Oral) This Regular Second Appeal by appellant/defendant is directed against judgment and judgment dated December 23,2005, passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division) Kapurthala, whereby a suit for possession was decreed in favour of respondents/plaintiffs, who have been held to be the legal representatives of the original owner of the house in dispute, on the basis of a Will dated July 24,1969. The appeal filed by the appellant/defendant has also been dismissed by the learned District Judge, Kapurthala, vide judgment and decree dated February 23,2007. The appellant has been held to be in unauthorised possession. There are concurrent findings of the Courts below on material issues that the disputed house belongs to the common ancestor of the respondents/plaintiffs and appellant/defendant has been in unauthorised possession. The relevant findings of the Courts below on crucial issues are neither perverse nor unreasonable. Moreover, learned counsel for the appellant also failed to point out any substantial question of law for consideration by this Court. Hence, this appeal stands dismissed in limine. April 19,2007 (Pritam Pal) RR Judge