IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 15236 of 2009 Between: 1 Dereddy Pedda Subba Reddy S/o. D. Chinna Subba Reddy R/o. 15/977, Modameedipalli, Proddatur, Kadapa District. 2 Mallela Maralidhar S/o. M. Venkata Ramana Reddy R/o. 3/75, Rayavaram, Khaderabad (Post) Proddutur Mandal, Kadapa District. 3 Kasetty Renuka W/o. Narasimha R/o. 2-3-70/48m, Flt No. 203, Veeraswamy Mansion, Ambeerpet, Hyderabad-13. 4 Rajoli Uma W/o. Mallela Muralidhar R/o. 3/75, Rayavaram, Khaderabad Post, Proddutur Mandal, Kadapa District. 5 Dereddy Venkata Subba Reddy S/o. D. Pedda Subba Reddy R/o. 13/077, Modameedipalli, Proddatur, Kadapa District. 6 Rajoli Manikanta Reddy S/o. R. Siva Rami Reddy R/o. Flat No. 107, HIG, Block No. AB III, APHB Singapore Class TownShip, Pocharam, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Joint Collector Ranga Reddy District Lakdikapul, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, direction or order directing the respondent to consider the impleading petition dated 28-07-2007 filed in pending proceedings in file No. E1/7306/99 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.E.MADAN MOHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.NO.15236 OF 2009 ORAL ORDER In a proceedings pending before the respondent being file No.E1/7306/99, purportedly a suo motu revision proceedings initiated by the respondent under Section 166(B) of the A.P.(T.A) Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli, the petitioners filed an application on 28.07.2007 seeking impleadment in the proceedings to contest the initiation and consideration of the suo motu revision proceedings by the respondent. The petitioners’ grievance is that the respondent has not passed orders on the petitioners’ application for impleadment in proceedings bearing file No.E1/7306/99. In the facts and circumstances of the case, after hearing the learned Government Pleader for Revenue at the stage of admission, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider and pass orders on the impleading petition filed by the petitioners on 28-07-2007 (seeking impleadment in proceedings bearing file No.E1/7306/99), expeditiously and in any event within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The order of the respondent on the impleading petition shall be communicated to the petitioner and preferably the respondent would issue a notice to the petitioner to appear in person or through counsel for hearing on the impleading petition. No costs. _________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 29th JULY, 2009. *TSNR