WP(C) 2199/2003 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA None appears for the petitioner. I have heard Mr. P.N. Goswami, learned counsel for the respondents. By means of this writ petition filed in 2003, the petitioner has challen ged the Annexure-1 order dated 21.01.2003 by which he was placed under suspensio n. While entertaining the writ petition, it was provided by order dated 25.03.20 03 that the petitioner should be paid the subsistence allowance. In absence of any counter affidavit filed by the respondents, it is not discernible as to whether the petitioner is still under suspension or the same h as been revoked. It is also not discernible as to whether the departmental enqui ry in continuation of which the petitioner was placed under suspension, had been initiated and completed. However, Mr. P.N. Goswami, learned for the respondents, upon instruction , submits that in the meantime the petitioner has retired from service on attain ing the age of superannuation. He further submits that pursuant to the impugned order of suspension, a departmental proceeding was initiated and completed again st the petitioner. In view of the above, nothing survives in the writ petition. Accordingly , writ petition is disposed of.