WP No. 2892/2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2892 OF 2010 Ganesh Naval Patil, R/o. At post Nandra (Bk), Tq. & Dist. Jalgaon. ....Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents. Mr. S.P. Tiwari h/f. Mr. N.L. Choudhari, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.G. Patil, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. A.B. Girase, Advocate for respondent No. 3. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & T. V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATED : 13th September, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner claims to have been in service as lecturer from the year 2001 onwards. The petitioner's contention is that as the petitioner has been working since last several years, his services are required to be regularized and approved. The difficulty in the way of the petitioner, according to the learned counsel, is that the post was reserved for V.J.N.T. But, after expiry of so many years the post got dereserved, on Deputy Director granting no objection certificate in favour of the Management. The learned counsel, therefore, submits that now post is dereserved and petitioner's services are required to be considered and WP No. 2892/2010 2 approved. 3. Learned counsel Shri. Girase appearing for respondent No. 3 submits that it is clear policy of the State that the post, which is reserved, has to be filled in by a candidate belonging to respective caste till the State Government permits the Management to dereserve the post and initiate fresh recruitment process to fill in the post by candidate belonging to any other caste as prescribed in the policy of the State. In absence therefore, the learned counsel submits that the petitioner could not claim any vested right to the post in which he was appointed by the Management. 4. In the light of the fact that the subject post was reserved since beginning for the candidate belonging to V.J.N.T., the petitioner cannot claim any vested right to the subject post. In spite of service, the Management has not appeared before this Court. 5. There is no merit in the petition. The petition is rejected. [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] [ NARESH H. PATIL, J.] ssc/