HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PE'HTION (227) N0. 5943/2011 PETITIONERS: 1. Ashok Kumar, son of Janakmm, as“; auum 28 years. 2. Mu. Geeta Bai, son of Janakmm, wife of James Knmar, aged about 27 years. ll \nFnnr‘lnn+n\ nnnA nknn+ \ublbuuml.§l WRIT PETITION‘ UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. \_. (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) "" ‘ z Present:-Shri C. Jayant K. Ran, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Vinod Kumar ’l‘ekam, P.L. for the State/ respondent No. 3. Respondents No. 1 85 2 not noticed. ORDER (Passed on 30/09 /201 1) 1. ‘By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India petitioners have challenged the legality and propriety of the order dated 28/ 6/ 201 1 passed by Civil Judge Class-2 Patthalgaon District Jashpur (ea) in civil suit No. 3A/ 2o 1o. l 3, Jivendra Lal, son of Bhupsai, aged about 45 years. 4. Dinesh Kumar, son of Bhupsai, aged about 40 yeaxs. All belongs to caste Uraon, occupation Agriculture, residence of village Redo, Tahsil Patthalgaon, ‘ Police Station Baghbahar, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. Versus Respondents: 1. Naxesh, son of Bhupsai, aged about Plaitm‘d‘s: 30 years, 2. Mu. Rijho Bai, wife of Bhupsai, aged about 55 years. Both belongs to caste Uraon, occupation Agriculture, residence of village Rede, Police Station Baghbahar, Tahsil Patthalgaon, District Jashpur, Chhatu‘sgarh. 3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. {7/ .—/ 2. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise all the grounds befom the Court below and also to f11e application for issue on the point of msjudicata. 3. Pxayer allowed. 4. Consequently, petition is dismissed as Withdlawn with aforesaid liberty. No order as to costs. Sd/— T.P. Sharma Judge w/ z.“ n ~ i wufww. , ’