IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7965 of 2005 MANDEO RAI Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS. For the Petitioner : M/S Ganesh Pd. Singh, Sharad Kr. Sinha, Advocates. For the Respondent Airlines : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate. ----------- 5. 11.7.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the Indian Airlines Ltd. 2. Petitioner at the relevant time was serving as a helper with the Indian Airlines Ltd. at the Patna Airport. After domestic inquiry he has been removed from service by the employer under orders dated 27.4.2005 as contained in Annexure-14 to this application, which order has also been affirmed by the appellate court under order dated 11.6.2005, Annexure-16. The two orders have been assailed in this writ application on the ground that principles of natural justice was violated by the Enquiry Officer during domestic enquiry, which submission was also not appreciated by the appellate authority and thereby the petitioner has suffered removal and is languishing in penury. 3. In this background it is submitted that avoiding the alternative remedy before the Conciliation Officer under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, this Court should interfere in the matter. I am not inclined to do so and accordingly, relegate the petitioner to the Conciliation Officer under the Industrial Disputes Act for seeking conciliation of the dispute with the employer and in the event of failure report from the Conciliation Officer, dispute be referred to the Industrial Tribunal at Patna. The conciliation - 2 - proceeding be conducted as early as possible, in any case within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before the Conciliation Officer. 4. This writ application is, accordingly disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)