1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1040/2008 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.911/2009 Ananda S.Honmane Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra Respondents Mr.Umesh R.Mankapure for the applicant Mr.Kharge,APP for State CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J. DATE : 30th SEPTEMBER,2009 P.C. . This is an application for bail filed in appeal against the order dated 30/8/2008 passed by the Ad Hoc Sessions Judge, II Sangli . The accused is found guilty of the offence punishable u/s 304-Part-II of the Indian Penal Code and he is sentenced to suffer R.I.for seven years with fine. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that earlier he has filed bail application and while rejecting the said application this Court has given liberty to file application after six months. So he preferred another application and the said application was rejected on 13/4/2009 with liberty to apply for bail in June, 2009. Hence this application. 2] I have gone through the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge. The application for bail was made on the point that he is 65 years old and there is discrepancy in the evidence of the medical officer who had 2 examined the victim. The submissions of learned counsel for the applicant on the point of the discrepancy in the nature of wound and the weapon used are not convincing. There is no ground to consider the bail application at this stage. Hence rejected. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)