Ho.^7., ^ 1<»4-^^ ^1 ? ^'ferf ^o^y.S^^l^^-^^w^^^ |: by SMJ^...U^^^>^^ f^ff^ffMw, ^. P^ ^<to», If^wst, K^WK, ^ BEFORg THE HON'BLB STATS ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAl^ B3NCH RAIRJR. C.A.NO. 2000 Appllcant f ^' Non-appllcant ..-^; ^r> Sonu Rair* Churendra, Aged 4$ years, s/o Shri chalnslngh Churendra^ Asstt< Supdt, of Land Records^ 8ajnan<3gaone VSRSUS. '• ^-^"State Govt.of Chhattlsgarh Through - The Secretary, Winlstry of Revenue Departroeat, ^ecretarlat, • Comrnlssloner^ LanB Secords and Settl®ment, Gwallor^. M.P. ^3< collector, Rajnandgaon. 4, Lakhan Lal Dl^an Superlntendent Land Reoores^ Mahasamu.nd< APS^ICATION U/S 19 OF THB ADMINISTRATP/S TRIBUNM. ACT 1985, ___.-.^—-.-Ti———^ ^— —^--.——..—.-—.-.--.————-— ^—- vSTI^I'^T 'fe;:IW3T[i^I '^-TT^ ^{$a ^j.r1 \ ' ——i- ^E[?qizn^T^, 'S^TCHT?, T^^i^y 3ff^r ^^^ ^..^..tG..}.3.: WH^IS ^h^ti^ ^ 200 f^^T* 3T?^T'^^T?[R ^Tf^ Gbl^^l-l 'RTR^f ^ 'ftT^ <FJi^K -^ 3?^? >3Ti^T SB: Hon'ble ShrTManindra 17.P3.2Q10 Shri V.K. Chakravarty, Mohan Shrivastava, J. Advocate appears on behalf of Shri AJay Shrivastava, counsel for the ij)etitioner. Shri Ar^ind Dubey, Pa^el Lawyer for the State. In this petition, the pejEitioner has claimed benefits of pay-scale and seniority of the post |Superintendent, Land Records, on the strength that in the gradati^n list (Annexure A-2), he was shown as Superintendent, Land Recor^ls and his junior/respondent No.4 who |aas been getting higher pay-scale of the IRecords. was placed just below him, post of Superintendent, Land In the return of the petitloner was never promotec^ the gradation list, if was ir^ Land Records. It is also subni was considered by the D< 27.8.1998, but the petition respondents, it has been stated that as Superintendent, Land Records and in aorrectly mentioned as Superintendent, itted that petitioner's case for promotion ^partmental Promotion Committee on |er was not found fit for promotion. Respondent No.4 was found tcj be eligible, therefore, he was promoted. There is no claim in t^ie petition that the petitioner was ever promoted by any order. Even i^o order of promotion has been placed on record. The entire basis of cls|im is that since in the gradation list he was shown as Superintendenjt, Land Records, he was entitled to the -L- ['^7?fe;r? maSw^iK.fwm^ :C-22 ^oE[ ^||<4td^ ^TTlyjl<o\ ^<vl^ll< ST^T 'cra^? ^m^t ^^j^...—...———.—^^ ^^ •^R^sy" CT^T^T t^TW^iT^I 9h^i<=h ^rit^ ^iinha. ^TT^T ^HW^feT -z.- pay-scale of that post. There isj apparent that the petitioner Superintendent, Land Records. gradation list, it was incorrectly claim as of right that he shoul^l Records and granted pay-scale oj no valid basis for such a claim. It is \^as never promoted on the post of IMerely because while publishing the |nentioned, petitioner is not entitled to be treated as Superintendent, Land the post. In the result, the petition l|i dismissed and is accordingly dis^nissed rias no merits. The same is liable to be It will, however, be ope] grievance before tie appropriate to the post of Superintendent, already raised. cbl1Ll(d4lr1 'RTR^Tf ^ ^S ipsl^K ^r'sri^TR ^3TTcF?T for the petitioner to ventilate his Forum. in so far as his non-promotion Land Records is concerned, if not Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Jude l-n^ •^•^