1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION ST. NO.4503 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4098 OF 2009 Manoj S/o Venkoba Lokhande, Age-45 years, Occu:Service as Section Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Sengaon, Tq-Sengaon, Dist-Hingoli. ...APPLICANT. VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra, Through Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2) The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Hingoli, Tq. & Dist-Hingoli, 3) The Chief Executive Officer, Parbhani, Tq. & Dist-Parbhani, 4) The Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri. M.P. Kale Advocate for Review Applicant. Shri. R.P. Phatke, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 4. Shri. S.R. Bagal Advocate for Respondent No.2. Shri. Vivek Bhavthankar Advocate for Respondent No.3. ... 2 CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.U. CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE : 17TH MARCH, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the Review Applicant submitted that identical issue was raised in the proceedings of Writ Petition No.242 of 2009 and consequent to the Judgment and order dated 4th August, 2009 passed in the said Writ Petition, similarly situated persons got the benefit. The counsel therefore submitted that this Court may also grant the same relief as was granted in the proceedings of Writ Petition No.242 of 2009. 3. Learned counsel Shri Bhavthankar appeared for the Zilla Parishad and pointed out the reply filed in the proceedings of Writ Petition No.4098 of 2009. 3 4. After considering the submissions, we do not find that the Applicant has raised justifiable and satisfactory ground to entertain the Review Application. The Review Application is accordingly dismissed. [K.U. CHANDIWAL J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/MAR10/rast4503.10