IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35672 of 2010 BIRU SAHNI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the State. Although petitioners are named in the F.I.R. with allegation that they assaulted the informant with lathi causing injury on his finger and hand but learned counsel for petitioners points out that informant and petitioners are agnates and the case has already been compromised between the parties. It appears from perusal of impugned order of learned Sessions Judge that he rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail of these petitioners on the ground that they came before learned Sessions Judge after four years of the alleged occurrence. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, this anticipatory bail application is allowed and it is ordered that petitioners, namely, (Biru 2 Sahni and (2) Umesh Sahni, in the event of arrest/surrender within 30 days from the date of communication of this order to the concerned court in connection with Paproo P.S. Case No.25 of 2005, shall be released on released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M.(West), Muzaffarpur, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. PN/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)