IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 16th day of April, 2010 Ist Bail Application No. 431 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Harnam Singh .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 04/2010, U/s 420/406 IPC, PS Clement Town, District Dehradun. April 16, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mr. RP Nautiyal, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant argued that dispute is civil in nature and even there is no evidence that the petitioner has received the abovesaid amount mentioned in the FIR and he is in jail since the last about two months and has got no previous criminal history. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Harnam Singh be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of CJM, Dehradun. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 16.4.2010 PRABODH