RFA Nos.152 of 2005 alongwith RFA Nos.153, 154, 155, 156, 167, 169,258, 288, 289, 298, 299, 301, 302 ,308 and 321 of 2005. RFA No.152 of 2005. 04.11..2009 Present: Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the appellant. Mr.B.N. Sharma, Advocates, for respondent No.1. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.2 and 3. RFA No.153 of 2005. Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the appellant. Mr.B.N. Sharma, Advocates, for respondent No.1. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.2 and 3. RFA No.154 of 2005. Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the appellant. Mr.B.N. Sharma, Advocates, for respondent No.1. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.2 and 3. RFA No.155 of 2005. Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the appellant. Mr.Sanjay Sharma, Advocates, for respondent No.1. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.2 and 3. RFA No.156 of 2005. Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the appellant. Mr.Sanjay Sharma, Advocates, for respondent No.1. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.2 and 3. RFA No.152 of 2005 (2) RFA No.167 of 2005. Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the appellant. Mr.Sanjay Sharma, Advocates, for respondent No.1. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.2 and 3. RFA No.169 of 2005. Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the appellant. Mr.Sanjay Sharma, Advocates, for respondent No.1. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.2 and 3. RFA No.258 of 2005. Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the appellant. Mr.Sanjay Sharma, Advocates, for respondent No.1. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.2 and 3. RFA No.288 of 2005. Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the appellant. Mr.Sanjay Sharma, Advocates, for respondent No.1. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.2 and 3. RFA No.289 of 2005. Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the appellant. Mr.Sanjay Sharma, Advocates, for respondent No.1. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.2 and 3. RFA No.152 of 2005 (3) RFA No.298 of 2005. Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the appellant. MrSanjay Sharma, Advocates, for respondents No.1 and 2. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.3 and 4. RFA No.299 of 2005. Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the appellant. Mr.P.C. Sharma, Advocates, for respondent No.1. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.2 and 3. RFA No.301 of 2005. Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the appellant. Mr.Sanjay Sharma, Advocates, for respondent No.1. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.2 and 3. RFA No.302 of 2005. Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the appellant. Mr.Sanjay Sharma, Advocates, for respondents No.1 to 5. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.6 and 7. RFA No.308 of 2005. Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the appellant. Mr.B.N. Sharma, Advocates, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(b). Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.2 and 3. RFA No.152 of 2005 (4) RFA No.321 of 2005. Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the appellant. Mr.Sanjay Sharma, Advocates, for respondents Nos.1(a) and 2. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.3 and 4. RFA Nos.152 of 2005 alongwith RFA Nos.153, 154, 155, 156, 167, 169,258, 288, 289, 298, 299, 301, 302 ,308 and 321 of 2005. It is undisputed before me that the land, which is subject matter of acquisition proceedings in all these appeals, was acquired for defence purposes. The entire chunk of land of various land owners was the subject matter of a common Notification, dated 16.11.1994, under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Collector made a common award for the entire land vide award No.1/1998, dated 19.3.1998. The claimants filed Reference Petition(s) before the Land Reference Court which was/were decided separately in small batches and disposed of RFAs No.246, 247 and 287 of 2004 which deal with the same acquisition proceedings. It is undisputed before me that all these appeals also arise out of the same award. These appeals are accordingly disposed of in terms of the judgment passed in RFA No.246 of 2004, titled Union of India vs. Joginder Singh and Others and connected with RFAs No.247/2004 and 287/2004, decided on 16th December, 2008. All these appeals are accordingly disposed of. They shall abide by the judgment passed in RFA No.246 of 2004, titled: Union of India vs. Joginder Singh and Others. All miscellaneous applications shall stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. RFA Nos.152 of 2005 (5) The Registry is directed to place on record a copy of the judgment passed in RFA No.246 of 2004, titled: Union of India vs. Joginder Singh and Others in each appeal. November 4, 2009 (Dev Darshan Sud) (aks) Judge.