-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1277 OF 2003 Shri.Dashrath Mahadu Ahire ..Petitioner Vs. Sau.Sunita Dashrath Ahire & Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.Ganesh Gole Advocate for Petitioner Mr.P.R.Bhatkar Adv. i/b Mr.H.V.Bhadbhade for Respondent No.1 Mr.M.M.Deshmukh,A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 31,2006 DATE : JULY 31,2006 DATE : JULY 31,2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the petitioner, learned advocate for the Respondent No.1-original complainant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The learned Judicial Magistrate F.C., Nashik by order dated 28.12.2000 had granted maintenance of Rs.1200/- per month to the Respondent-wife. Being -2- aggrieved by the said order, revision came to be preferred by the petitioner. The said revision came to be rejected by order dated 22.8.2002 by the learned Addl.Sessions Judge, Nashik. Being aggrieved by the said order, the present writ petition has been preferred. 3. Mr.Gole, the learned advocate for the petitioner states that the respondent-wife has expired. In view of this fact, nothing further survives in the present petition and the same is disposed of. [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]