^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0. / 4^3<5~ /2005 PETITIONER ^ Versus Rajeshwar Prasad Sharma, Son of Shri Vishnu Prasad Sharma, aged about 48 years, R/o. Village - Reitapur, Tah. Pandariya, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). ^ KBSPQNDENTS ^ ^ 3i;.^r f^^-. ^s?^^." ^6<' 1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, School Education Departnient, Mantralaya, D.K.S.Bhawan, G.E.Road, Raipur (C.G.). "vi '•' ^•<l> 2) Director of Public Instructions, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Directorate of Public Instructions, (DPI Office) Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) r,0^< .^.'(?' ^.rS^ /^ ^^ ..^:^ IV<\ . v$ ^Cy Yt(; / ^v^ ' 3) Deputy Director of Public ^- ^.O^ -- ' Instruction, •^s^ \0 Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Education Department, Education District Bilaspur, (C.G.). A, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. The petitioner begs to subniit as under:- XI-HC-22 3:^T;:^PTR;PT, ^Tn<141(o, [cl^tW^i 311^1 ^5(<ft ^-^.^^..^.<.\..^S^ i^ ^INdl*^itb;v^^"' •'•%''<l'' '*• • ^- ^l 3^T^>T f^TWW^T 9h^icb^cT |»|»NlU»'t- jlplBittiii^ 3T1^r^<TraT^f?cT 19^-2005 Mr. ASok Nigam, counsel for t^t Mr. Akhil Agrawal, Panel Heard both the counsel. The case of the petitioner Department of the erstwhile State appointment of ad-hoc Assistent Schools. in that test the p©titione( appointed for a period of three However, the sen/ices of vacancy, which arose on accoun|t services, was filled by the Statel petitjoner 1$ regularly making for appointment on the post of jn the y©ar1997 the erstwhile State) teachers in place of Shiksha Karmi|, by the State of Chhattisgarh. Learned counsel for the peti( allowed to make a representatio|n grievances and respondent No.2 b4 which tearned Panel Lawyer for th4 Having heard tearned couns^l facfcs and circumstances of the detaiied representatjon to respondeti all his grievances, and in turn, res| representation made by the petitiont three months from the date of the Teacfrier cf)i<ilci41^ Hi<4^T^f^<f)'<[^^i< ^3:rf^T3TT^T tl^e petitioner. Law^er for the State. that in the year 1981 the Education j>f Madhya Pradesh conducted a test for ITeachere in the Government Primary was s^lected and accordingly, he was , m^nths ^he petitioner were discontinued and the of discontinuatjon of the petitioner's of Madhya Pradesh. Thereafter, the repr^sentations for considering the petitioner Further case of the petitioner is that |of M.P. took a decision to ^ppoint ad-hoc but the same is not being implemented :ioner submits that the petitloner may be to respondent No.2 raising all his directed to decide his representetion, to State of Chhattisgarh has no objoction. s^l for the parties and having regard to the s, the petitioner is ailowed to make a |it No.2 within ten days from today raising t^ondent No.2 is directed to consider the »rand decide the same within a period of r^ceipt of the representatjon in an objective csfse XI-HC-22 ^TT^T^T RFTW^TT^T T^^cT $h^W^T l^^ttl^. Soma ^l^dT^^lcb 3^T r^l^l^t^, ^Tfl'M^Ko, fc|diy^< 3il^i M5|ch u.^ .... ..^...^...../.. ...~y. ^ 200JS' o?^ 3TT^T?^TT^K^f?cT - -s manner after considering the grjevances of fce petitioner, in accordance with law. With the direction aforesafid, Consequentiy, JA.Nos.28|44/2005 of. Parties are entitled for ceip:ified copy ofthis order. 28144/2005 /^K.-^re- (^s-ei^ . ^"1 ^^^^1 f^ ^^ •h'i^ ^-^ ejs^^c^A^^ cbi^fd41^ ^i^^T^tel^<fa^i< ^>3Tf^T3TT^T , the petition stands djsposed of. and 2845/2005 also stand disposed Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge ?o^^^D^^-<^ ^^lsA--^ /^-^ y^-i /^^-^- ^-M. -^-e-L^ Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge 7- /y/0^