1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Civil Writ Petition No.1675 of 2007 Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and ors. Petitioners Vs. Trade Center Developers and Builders Pvt.Ltd. Respondent Mr.N.V.Walawalkar, Senior Counsel h\i/b. Rustamji & Ginwala for petitioners. Mr.K.Y.Mandlik for respondents. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. March 15, 2007. P.C. . This writ petition impugns the decree of eviction passed by the trial Court and confirmed by the lower appellate Court under the Rent Act. For the reasons stated in my order dated 24/8/2006 in Writ Petition No.4138 of 2006 the Courts below being subordinate Courts to this Court, a statutory remedy of filing civil revision application under Section 115 of CPC is available and, therefore, writ petition need not be entertained. . Hence the petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file civil revision application.. . Annexures to the petition memo be returned 2 forthwith to the petitioners’ counsel, if applied for. . Mr.Mandlik, the learned counsel for the respondents states that he has filed a caveat and the eviction decree is already a subject matter of execution proceedings. He has also pointed out that though the lower Appellate Court’s order was dated 13/11/2006, this petition has been moved before this Court for the first time on 6/3/2007. Rather than inviting an order of protection to be passed by this Court, Mr.Mandlik has given an assurance that the impugned decree will not be put to execution for a period of two days, from today. (B.H.MARL