IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 7466 of 1995 Between: Gunda Venkataramudu S/o. Chintalappa R/o. Nagireddypally (V), H/o Epperu, Kudair Mandal, Ananthapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kudair Mandal, Kudair. 2 Mallikarjuna Reddy, R/o. Nagireddypally (V), H/o. Epperu, Kudair Mandal, Ananthapur District. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the first Respondent in orally evicting the petitioner without notice, enquiry and orders in writing as illegal, arbitrary, in violation of principles of natural justice and abuse of powers. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.BHASKARA CHARI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.2: None The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 7466 of 1995 ORAL ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _______________ 09th August, 2004 Nsr/Tvk To 1. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kudair Mandal, Kudair. 2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of AP., Hyderabad (OUT) 3. Two CD copies.