AB 685/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.K. MUSAHARY Heard Mr. P.K. Roy Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Munir, learned Addl. P.P. Assam. C.D. as called for has been produced. I have perused the same along with the FIR. It appears that the accused petitioner No. 1 is the employer of the in formant. The accused petitioner No. 1 is running fish market and due to his heal th problem he authorized the informant to run his business and look after the ac counts etc. But taking advantage of such authority, he has mis-appropriated an amount of Rs. 6 lakhs. The FIR has been lodged by the informant to save himsel f from the misdeed he has committed by way of mis-appropriating the aforesaid a mount. The other accused persons have been implicated as they wanted to solve th e matter amicably between the parties. There is nothing on record that the accus ed petitioner No. 1 threatened or warned the informant with dire consequence etc . It appears that the matter is purely pertaining to monetary transaction betwee n the accused petitioner No. 1 and the informant. In view of the above, the interim bail in respect of the accused petitioner No. 3 and 4 granted vide order dated 11.03.2011 is made absolute on same terms and c onditions. Similarly in respect of other co-accused petitioner Nos. 1 and 2, it is provided that in the event of their arrest in connection with Jorhat P.S. C ase No. 120.2011 u/s. 327/347/457/384/506 IPC they shall be released on bail of Rs. 20,000/- with one local surety of the like amount subject to satisfaction o f the arresting authority on condition that they shall fully co-operate with the Investigating Agency and shall not jump the bail and shall appear before the I. O. as and when required. Further, the accused petitioner No. 1 and 2 shall appea r before the I.O. concerned within 7 (seven) days from today for recording their statements. The bail application stands disposed of.