E'» KW1^ c- ^ < a s^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.1 WRIT PETITION N0^°>43 /20D5 PETITIONER / '.-^ v\^y -<\^^'"y "^y ;N^' Vedram Yadav Son of Shri Natthuram Yadav, aged abouf52 years, Watchman, Matsya Beej Prakshetra, Shanicharadih, Baloda, District Bilaspur(C.G.). .rf' ^•" .s&' RESPOMDENTS VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, Department of Fisheries, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.). The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). The Assistant Director, Fisheries Industries, Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). The Director, Fisheries Industries, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONST-ITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OFWRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. '7: ^-—^ XI-HC-22 tfxq •<n<iict<i, oAwie, RclUl^l VfSlfK ««*<niii>*iiw.;^.:(?-^0::'.^cl^/ ""'""•"^aofty fire%""""""— sn^rw I^IR>3|1^T li> uliti ShHI«ft'ff ii^l; 'c' w aii^<i6«ii<a<ulitt 12.09:2005 Shri PP Sahu,counset for th Shri Vivek Shar'ma, Panel •»»ifa<)liii*ic^ fffa><!l <Rit<iii ^sri^iran^r petitioner. ^wyer for the State / respondent No.l,3&4. ; ' ; - None for respondent N6;2. Learned cpunsel forthe pe|t!tioner submjts-thot the petitioner has been working s»s Watchman |in the Department of Fishries and posted at Shanicharadih, Bgloda,) He has .not been paidsalary.sirice June 2002 till date, as stated in F(ara 5.6 of the petition. After conducting proper ^nquiry (Annexure P-5), the Chief Executive Officer, Ziila Pancha'j(at, Janjgir Chairipa vide his letter dated 27.05.2603, nddressed •foDeput/ Djrector, Fisheries has inforrned that the petitioneir hc^ not been paid his salary for the moriths of jLme,JulY, j5ept®mbe^>October and Noyembee in the year 2002 whereas he has been paid (iatf of the sa'arv for the monthsof becember 2002, January, Febru Executive Officer further info |»ry and W.arch of 2003. The;Ghief ^med that -tiie petitioner has been worklng on this post regularly wilfiout payment of sal.ary. ; Learned counsei for the r^spondents 1, 3 & 4 does not dispute the facts and is not in a position| to state as .to why the salary'of the (•ffii^O XI-HC-22 3^''<ii<4i<'i<i,Brtfiwic,(«inwy. 3(t3i<'i<4a<n , •. ^^ .^.^^^^i^ WntTHXfIW 200 ^s sn^irqir R-ii+aii^ff ^s a»i0>« •padma 11; petitioner has'not-been'ipaid^i'll; Panchayat, Janjgir Charopa is elec In yiew of the faregoing, t piayment of salary 'of the peti.tipi within a period of three weetts f this order. ^ . . In view of the above, the p ,Certified copy as per rules «bwtd41-i•)i*iiA ftteA<Ri%K ^sri^Tsn^T doEte;-'*!'18"' the reportof GEO, Zilla !" and un-ambiguous, ie respondents dre directed to make ler as due from June 2002 till date, •om the date of receipt of a copy of stition standsallowed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge