( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2660 OF 2010 Pandharinath Ramchandra Dhoble PETITIONER VERSUS Ramesh Gopalrao Chole & others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. S.V. Gundre, advocate holding for Mr. P.G. Rodge, advocate for the petitioner. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 11th June, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. The petitioner sought one month’s time by filing application (Exh-64) for production of certain documents. The prayer clause of his application shows that he simply prayed for adjournment of one month. The application was rejected by the impugned order dated 4th March, 2010. He wanted one month’s time. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Motor Accident Claims Petition No. 102/2008 is still pending for recording of evidence. Since the one month’s time is over, no practical purpose ( 2 ) will be served if the petition is allowed and the adjournment is granted as was prayed for. The petitioner is granted liberty to apply afresh if the documents are available with him and he is ready to tender evidence without delay. Such fresh application may be considered by the trial Court. The petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/wp2660-10