IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI MONDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2008 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 15348 of 2008(S) -------------------------- OA.153/2008 of CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,ERNAKULAM BENCH .................... PETITIONER: ------------ C.UNNIKRISHNAN, AGED 48 S/O.LATE K.N.NARAYANA MENON, CHANDUVARATH NOW RESIDING AT "JAYA SRIKRISHNA", "SREYAS NAGAR" P.O.OLLUKARA, WORKING AS ASSISTANT AUDIT OFFICER/ OFFICE ESTABLISHMENT, OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL A G (AUDIT), KERALA, BRANCH THRISSUR-20 BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) RESPONDENTS: ---------------- 1. SHIBI T.MANJOORAN, MANJOORAN HOUSE POTTAYIL LANE, M.G.ROAD, THRISSUR 2. UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND C.A, NEW DELHI 3. COMPTROLLER & AUDITOR GENERAL OF INDIA NEW DELHI-10, BAHADURSHA ZAFAR MARG INDRAPRASTHA P.O., NEW DELHI. 4. THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (AUDIT) STATE OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. SENIOR AUDIT OFFICER/ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL A G (AUDIT) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA BY ADV.SHRI P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR FOR R2( ASST.S.G.) GOVT.PLEADER SHRI BENJAMIN PAUL FOR R4 & R5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C.HARI RANI JJ. ----------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No. 15348 OF 2008 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 26th DAY OF MAY, 2008 J U D G M E N T Balakrishnan Nair, J. The writ petitioner was the 5th respondent in O.A.No.153/08. Challenging the final order in the said O.A., a copy of which is produced as Exhibit P4, this writ petition is filed. Going by Exhibit P4, we notice that there is no whisper against the writ petitioner in that order. Therefore, he cannot be aggrieved by that. But, learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that the CAT, by Exhibit P4 order directed the competent authority to consider Annexure A7 representation. In the said representation there are certain unfounded allegations against him, it is submitted. If the competent authority while considering Annexure A7 relies on the allegations against him, then only he can be said to be aggrieved. In that event, he can work out his remedies. In view of the above position, this writ petition is closed without prejudice to the contentions of the petitioner. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR,JUDGE. M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE. dsn