IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2009 / 28TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 16896 of 2009(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SHAMEER M.V., S/O.M.V.MOHAMMED, AGED 28 YEARS, RESIDING AT SENIL MANZIL, THIRUR ROAD, KUTTIPPURAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. JEEHAN A., AISHA MANZIL, PALAMOONAM, PERUMKULAM P.O., ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY SC SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).16896/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 18th day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioners were the students of MES College of Engineering, Kuttippuram, for B.Tech Information Technology Degree Course for the academic years 2001-05. Apparently dissatisfied with the marks obtained by the 1st petitioner in two papers each in respect of the 3rd and 5th semester supplementary examination, and by the 2nd petitioner in one paper in respect of the 3rd and 4th semester and two and three papers respectively in the 5th and 6th semester examination, they had applied for revaluation. They are aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of B.Tech supplementary examination, W.P.(C).16896/2009 2 June, 2008. Exts.P1 to P6 applications for revaluation are pending before the respondents. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioners, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the applications for revaluation are in order and otherwise correct. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs