IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 315 of 2008 Ram Singh & Anothers. ….. Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. ….. Respondents Mr. Mohd. Umar, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Government Advocate for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Mohd. Umar, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Government Advocate for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, the learned Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted the chargesheet against petitioner no. 01-Ram Singh before the Circle Officer concerned on 19.08.2008 whereas petitioner no. 02-Surendra has not been chargesheeted as no prima facie evidence has been collected against him during investigation. The learned G.A. further submitted that the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit the chargesheet against petitioner no. 1-Ram Singh before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the short counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 30.04.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet / final report against petitioner no. 01-Ram Singh and petitioner no.02 Surendra before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 30.10.2008 V.K