BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:28.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR WP(MD)No.11162 of 2011 S.P.Ramakrishnan :Petitioner -Vs- 1. The Inspector, Boomithanam, Boomithanam Board, Tirunelveli Collectorate Campus, Tirunelveli. 2. The land Reforms Commissioner/Special Officer, Boomithanam Board, Department of Land Reforms, (Boomithanam Board), Elizham, Chepauk, Chennai-5. 3. The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 4. The Thasildar, Kovilpatti. :Respondents PRAYER:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the representation dated 01.08.2011 of the petitioner reiterating the contents of his lawyer notice dated 11.07.2011 for change of classification of the petitioner's land. For Petitioner :Mr.K.Hemakarthikeyan For Respondents:Mr.M.Govindan, Special Government Pleader ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the representation dated 01.08.2011 of the petitioner reiterating the contents of his lawyer notice dated 11.07.2011 for change of classification of the petitioner's land. 2.Heard Mr.K.Hemakarthikeyan, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader who takes notice for the respondents. 3.By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4.The petitioner seeks change of classification of the petitioner's land and has given a representation on 01.08.2011 to the first respondent. Since the said representation has not been considered so far, the writ petition has been filed by the petitioner. 5.The learned Special Government Pleader states that the first respondent is not a competent authority and the second respondent alone can consider the claim of the petitioner. 6.In such view of the matter, the petitioner is directed to make a proper representation to the second respondent and the second respondent shall consider the same on its own merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's case and the authority shall consider the same on its own merits. 7.The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. No Costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.side) / TRUE COPY / Sub Assistant Registrar To:1.The Inspector,Boomithanam, Boomithanam Board, Tirunelveli Collectorate Campus, Tirunelveli. 2.The land Reforms Commissioner/Special Officer,Boomithanam Board, Department of Land Reforms,(Boomithanam Board),Elizham,Chepauk,Chennai-5. 3. The District Collector,Thoothukudi District,Thoothukudi. 4. The Thasildar,Kovilpatti. +1CC to The Special Government Pleader. SR.No.33979. RP/11.10.2011/1P/6C. W.P.(MD)No.11162 of 2011 . https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/