THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23326 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner states that his parents are Palagani Sudhakar Reddy and Sangeetha and that his father died in a road accident just two months before his birth. The name of the petitioner is said to have been entered in the school records as Palagani Dushyanth Reddy S/o. late Palagani Sudhakar Reddy. The petitioner states that his mother married one Basant Sahoo in the year 1994 and inadvertently or otherwise in the records of X Class, his name was entered as Dushyanth Sahoo and the same name was entered in the Certificate issued by the Board of Intermediate Education as well as in the Passport. The petitioner filed O.S.No.4860 of 2007 in the Court of the X Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad for declaration that his name is P.Dushyanth Reddy S/o.late Palagani Sudhakar Reddy and for consequential direction to defendant Nos.3 to 5 therein to correct his name in the records. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Council for the Indian School Certificate Examination has issued a corrected certificate indicating the name of the petitioner as Dushyanth Reddy. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein, who figured as defendants 4 and 5 in the suit, did not take any action. Accordingly, he seeks appropriate directions. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the Intermediate Board. Strictly speaking, the petitioner has to seek execution of the decree vis-à-vis respondent Nos. 1 and 2. However, one fact, which becomes relevant, is that the particulars of an individual, be it as to the name or date of birth as entered in the S.S.C. or equivalent certificate, constitutes the basis for any subsequent certificates, such as, those in Degree, Post Graduation etc. The name of the petitioner was entered as Dushyanth Sahoo in the Intermediate Certificate and Passport on the basis of the entry in X Class Certificate. Once that is changed in pursuance of a decree passed by a civil Court, there is no reason why the respondents do not take necessary steps. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to consider the representation, dated 20.08.2009, made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:04.11.2009 kdl