IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5664 of 2010 Shyam Sunder Yadav s/o Saukhdeo Yadav, r/o village – Dumartola, P.S. – Khaira, District - Jamui Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna 2. The District Magistrate, Jamui 3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Jamui 4. The Superintendent of Police, Jamui 5. Rekha Devi w/o Ramji Rajak, r/o village- Dumartola, Panchayat – Amari, P.S. – Khaira, Jamui ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Dilip Kumar, AC to GA III --- 2 5/4/2010 This is the second visit by the petitioner alleging that though numerous irregularities are committed by the Mukhiya but no action is being taken. Be it noted, on the earlier occasion this court on 7.3.2008 in CWJC. No.3419 of 2008 had directed that if the petitioner approaches the appropriate authority the said authority shall act without unnecessary delay. It is submitted by Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, that though the petitioner has brought the irregularities committed by the Mukhiya to the notice of the District Magistrate vide Annexure – 9 series , no action has been taken. 2 Having heard Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Prasun Singh, learned counsel for the State, it is directed that the District Magistrate, Jamui shall take appropriate action on the representations made by the petitioner within a span of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order passed today. We may hasten to clarify that we have not expressed any opinion on merits of the allegation. With the aforesaid observation, the writ application stands disposed of. A free copy of the order be handed over to learned counsel for the State to transmit the same to the District Magistrate, Jamui to do the needful in the matter. Neyaz/ (Dipak Misra, CJ.) (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)