IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17396 of 2008 BUDDHEE LAL, SON OF LATE BABU LAL RESIDENT OF MOHALLA – KALI NO.1, TIP TOP SADAR BAZAR, JAMALPUR, P.S. JAMALPUR, DISTRICT - MUNGER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY-CUM- COMMISSIONER URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR. 3. THE COLLECTOR-CUM- DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUNGER 4. THE CHAIRMAN JAMALPUR NAGAR PARISAD, MUNGER. 5. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, JAMALPUR NAGAR PARISHAD, MUNGER ----------- 2. 07.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and the respondents – Jamalpur Nagar Parishad. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ application is with regard to retiral dues and other claims which have not been settled as yet. Mr. Ambika Bhagwat learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent – Jamalpur Nagar Parishad submits that in case petitioner files a representation stating with regard to details of their claims, the same would be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, petitioner proposes to file representation/fresh representation before the respondent no.5 stating all their claims enclosing the copy of the relevant documents if any, in 2 support of his claim alongwith certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today. In case such representation is filed, the respondent no. 5 shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the admitted claims of the petitioner could be paid without delay. However, if any of the claims are found not admissible as per law the same shall be communicated to the petitioner alongwith reasons therewith. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)