IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.543 of 2007 RAMANAND SINGH Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 06/ 12.01.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, learned assisting counsel to G.P. 1 and Mr. Vinod Kumar Labh for the Accountant General. A counter affidavit was filed on behalf of respondent no. 4, the District Provident Fund Officer, Chapra (Saran) making submission that the entire final payment of G.P.F. together with statutory interest has been computed and paid to the petitioner and that no claim of the petitioner is pending at his level. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner disputes the said statement and submits that the petitioner is eligible for some more payment towards G.P.F. and that the same has not been correctly calculated. Having regard to the facts and circumstances set forth, this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner, if so advised, to file a detailed representation before the District Provident Fund Officer, Chapra (Saran) setting out his claim for payment of the unpaid amount of provident fund and interest, if any 2 together with supportive details and which should be considered by the said authority and if the petitioner has been able to make any claim for any further amount of the G.P.F., the same should be paid to him without any delay together with admissible interest within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. The writ petition stands disposed of with the directions/observations aforesaid. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)