IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6472 of 2011 ANKIT KUMAR @ ANKIT SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 23.05.2011 Petitioner is languishing in custody since 29.04.2010 in a case registered under Sections 307, 302/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. In the F.I.R. the specific accusation of firing is levelled against Ram Binod Yadav though accusation was also there of firing against four unknown persons. Subsequently the name of the petitioner sprang up on confession of co-accused. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that against F.I.R. named accused persons the accusation was found false and final form was submitted. It is further submitted that in the trial of other accused earlier five witnesses have been examined but they have not named the petitioner. It appears that petitioner is an accused in five other cases but in those cases, subsequently on confessions his name sprang up and he is on bail in those cases. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present. The application for grant of bail of the petitioner stands rejected in connection with Barauni(Chakia) P.S. Case No. 252 of 2 2008 pending in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge- v, Begusarai. If the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within a period of nine months then petitioner will be at liberty to file appropriate application for grant of regular bail. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)