IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P No : 2692 of 2009 Between: Burramukku Pamula Reddy, Kunchenapalli Village, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND Yella Koteswara Rao, Vikas Nagar, Guntur and another. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P No.2692 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner is the defendant No.2, who filed this revision assailing the correctness of the orders passed in I.A.No.699 of 2007 in O.S.No.27 of 1999 dated 6.3.2009 on the file of the Court of II Additional District Judge, Guntur, dismissing the application purported to have been filed under Section 151 and 152 CPC for amendment of both judgment and decree. The Court below after taking into consideration the reasons mentioned in support of the application and also on a reading of the judgment and decree, did not find favour with the petitioner and dismissed the same. Hence, this revision. After hearing the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, it is seen that virtually the relief now sought for by the petitioner amounts to variation in regard to the findings given in the judgment, and therefore, necessarily either the judgment or the decree does not warrant any amendment. If at all the petitioner is aggrieved by the judgment and decree, the only remedy available to him is to file a regular appeal, but not otherwise. Hence, the Trial Court was right in dismissing the application. Hence, I see no reasons to interfere with the order under challenge and accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________________ JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO Date:25.9.2009 mrb