IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE. SIDE. SIDE. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 172 OF 1999. Shri Cheruvathur Varghese Joy ... Petitioner. V/s. Maegaware Computers Ltd. & ors ... Respondent. Shri K.P. Anilkumar for the petitioner. Shri A.H. Palekar, AGP for the respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 24.4.2006. : 24.4.2006. : 24.4.2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : ---- ---- ---- . Heard. . Perused petition. . Petitioner has alternate remedy under the Act for execution of the order. Contempt action is supposed to be a last resort, to be used sparingly. . In the result, petition is rejected in limine leaving the alternate remedy open. All contentions are kept open. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)