IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 4162 of 2008 Between: M. Sasi Bhushana Rao, S/o. Late Appala Ramana, House No. 16-05-203/1, Hayathi Nagaram, Gujarathi Peta, Srikakulam Town, Srikakulam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Srikakulam District, Srikakulam. 2 Srikakulam Municipality, Srikakulam, Rep. by its Commissioner. 3 The Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board, Rep. by its Member Secretary, Maithrivanam, Ameerpet, Hyderabad. 4 The REgional Environmental Engineer, Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board, Regional Office, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. 5 Sri Jami Venkataramana, S/o. late Avatharam, R/o. H.No. 1-13, Hayathi Nagaram, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District. 6 Smt. Jami Purna, W/o. Sri Jami, R/o. GH.No. 1-13, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ of Madnamus or any othera ppropriate Writ, order or direction declaring the action ofthe respondents 1 to 4 herein in not taking any action on the representation dt. 24-1-2007 (received by the respondents 1 and 2 herein on 25-1-2007 and received by the 4th respondent 27-1-2007) submitted by the petitioner herein wherein in the Petitioner herein requested the authorities to take action against the activities of the respondents 5 and 6 herein as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 48A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 herein to take appropriate action on the said representation and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.V.SESHA SAI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 4162 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: (Per Anil R. Dave, CJ) The learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No orders as to costs. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ R.SUBHASH REDDY,J DATE:15.4.2008 Tvk THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 4162 of 2008 Date: 15.4.2008