IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 24TH BHADRA 1932 RP.No. 813 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN CRP.129/2010 Dated 08/06/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/2ND RESPONDENT: ---------------------- M.G.CHANDRAN, S/O.LATE KUMARA PILLAI, AGED 45 YEARS, MUTHEDATH HOUSE M.G.ROAD NORTH END, ERNAKULAM BY ADV. SRI.JAIJI ITTEN RESPONDENT(S)/REVISION PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1, 3 AND 4: --------------- 1. M.K.BABY, D/O.LATE KUMARA PILLAI, MUTHEDATH DESOM, ERNAKULAM, RESIDING AT HOUSE 40/6604-A, M.G.ROAD, KOVILVATTOM DESOM, ERNAKULAM. 2. DR.M.K.MANI, S/O.LATE KUMARA PILLAI AGED 60 YEARS, KUMARA KRIPA, KRISHNA SWAMY ROAD, ERNAKULAM. 3. M.K.MOHANAKUMAR, D/O.LATE KUMARA PILLAI AGED 53, REISIDING AT HOUSE NO.56, NADA STREET NO.2.,COMBATORE-640001. 4. M.K.SEETHALAKSHMI, D/O.LATE KUMARA PILLAI, AGED 50 YEARS, MUTHEDATH HOUSE,RESIDING AT HOUSE NO-40/6604-A, M.G.ROAD, KOVILVATTOM DESOM, ERNAKULAM ADV. SRI.T.K.VENUGOPALAN FOR R4 SRI.SHIBU JOSEPH FOR R4 SMT.R.RANJINI FOR R2 SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN FOR R1 SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA FOR R1 SMT.D.S.THUSHARA FOR R1 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- R.P.No.813 of 2010 in C.R.P.No.129 of 2010 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of September, 2010. ORDER This petition is filed on behalf of respondent No.2 in C.R.P.No.129 of 2010 for review of order dated June 8, 2010 in the said Civil Revision Petition (for short, “the C.R.P.”) as per which the said petition was allowed. It is stated in the review petition that counsel for petitioner herein ( respondent No.2 in the C.R.P.) was not heard. The C.R.P. was posted for hearing on several occasions but counsel for petitioner in the review petition was not available. Thereon I heard learned counsel for other parties in the C.R.P. and disposed of the same. However, since the C.R.P. was disposed of without hearing counsel for petitioner (respondent No.2 in the C.R.P.) I am inclined to give him an opportunity to address arguments. Hence the order dated June 8, 2010 in C.R.P.No.129 of 2010 is recalled. This review petition is allowed in that line. I.A.No.2221 of 2010 will stand dismissed. THOMAS P.JOSEPH, Judge. cks