IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 16TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 25TH BHADRA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 5522 of 2010(A) ----------------------------------- (CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.) ........... PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED ------------------------------ A.MUHAMMED SHAFI, S/O. MOIDEENKUTTY, ALIKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, MATTARAKKAL.P.O., ARAKKUPAAMBU, PERINTHALMANNA,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.K.V.RESHMI RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT AND STATE ---------------------------------------------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION. 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: SVS/ V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No. 5522 of 2010 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * DATED: 16th day of September, 2010 O R D E R The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail on the allegation that the Perinthalmanna Police are at his heels in connection with some undisclosed crime involving non-bailable offences. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor on instructions submitted that the petitioner is the 1st accused in Crime No.935/2010 of the aforesaid police station registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 448 and 506(i) read with 34 IPC and that all the aforesaid offences are bailable offences. If so, invocation of Section 438 Cr.P.C is misconceived. This petition is accordingly dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to seek regular bail from the Magistrate concerned. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. dmb