IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Crl. Misc. Application (C-482) No. 851 of 2005 1. Subhash Chandra Mahendru S/o late Sri Tarsem Lal R/o EWS-143, M.D.D.A. Colony, Chander Road, Police Station Raipur, District Dehradun. 2. Smt. Usha Mahendru W/o Shri Subhash Chandra Mahendru R/o EWS-143, M.D.D.A. Colony, Chander Road, Police Station Raipur, District Dehradun. 3. Lucky Mahendru S/o Shri Subhash Chandra Mahendru R/o EWS-143, M.D.D.A. Colony, Chander Road, Police Station Raipur, District Dehradun. 4. Smt. Rama Mahendru W/o Shri Lucky Mahendru R/o EWS-143, M.D.D.A. Colony, Chander Road, Police Station Raipur, District Dehradun. ...…………. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal 2. Smt. Anita Chopra W/o Sh. Deepak Chopra D/o Sri Laxman Singh Rawat R/o EWS-211, M.D.D.A. Colony, Chander Road, Police Station Raipur, District Dehradun. ...…………. Respondents Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent No. 1 / State. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard. 2 2) By means of this petition, moved under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.), the petitioners have sought quashing of the proceedings of Criminal Complaint Case No. 2784 of 2004; Smt. Anita Chopra Vs. Deepak Chopra and others, relating to offences punishable under Section 406, 504, 506 of I.P.C., pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate (CBI), Dehradun. 3) Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that respondent No. 2 Anita Chopra (wife) has entered into compromise with her husband Deepak Chopra. A copy of the compromise has been filed with the affidavit dated 25th of April 2010. In Para 7 of the compromise, the respondent No. 2 has agreed to get terminated the criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No. 2784 of 2004 (Old No. 4011 of 2004), Anita Chopra Vs. Deepak Chopra and others. 4) In view of the principle of law laid down in B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 Supreme Court Cases 675, since the parties to the matrimony have already entered into compromise, this petition deserves to be allowed. 5) Therefore, the petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is allowed. The proceedings of Criminal 3 Complaint Case No. 2784 of 2004 (Old No. 4011 of 2004), Smt. Anita Chopra Vs. Deepak Chopra and others, relating to offences punishable under Section 406, 504, 506 of I.P.C., pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate (CBI), Dehradun, are hereby quashed. (Stay Vacation Application No. 1618 of 2006 and Misc. Application No. 413 of 2010 stand disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt. April 30, 2010. H. Negi 4