IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 1ST AUGUST 2011 / 10TH SRAVANA 1933 RP.No. 565 of 2011(U) ---------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.18561/2011 Dated 08/07/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- RUKIYA KASSIM, W/O. KASSIM, ASSIYA NATTAPARAMBIL, PATHANADU BHAGAM, KANGAZHA VILLAGE, MALLAPPALLY. BY ADV. SRI. K.SHAJ SRI.SAJJU.S RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVALLA. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KEEZHVIPUR POLICE STATION. 4. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., POOVATHUR BUILDINGS, M.C.ROAD, CHENGANNUR. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss R.P. NO.565/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES A1:- CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD 8.7.2011 IN WPC. 18561/2011 OF THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES NIL:- TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- R.P. No. 565 of 2011 in W.P.(C) No. 18561 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of August , 2011 O R D E R The writ petition filed by the petitioner was disposed of by judgment dated 8th July, 2011 directing that orders be passed on the application made by the petitioner for interim custody of the vehicle. In this R.P. his grievance is that in the judgment, the prayer in the writ petition for a direction to the respondent to expeditiously complete the confiscation proceedings under the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001 was not considered. 2. It is true that the petitioner had sought such a direction in the writ petition and it is also true that the said prayer was not considered while disposing of the writ petition. In that view of the matter I find that there is R.P. No. 565 of 2011 in W.P.(C) No. 18561 OF 2011 :2 : substance in the above said grievance of the review petitioner. Therefore the R.P. is disposed of directing that on production of a copy of this order before the 2nd respondent, he shall finalize the proceedings against the petitioner's vehicle as expeditiously as possible with notice to the parties. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge