1 WP No.2690/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Writ Petition No.2690 Of 2009 Hanuman S/o. Sakharam Phad .. Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents. -------- Shri. Sudarshan J. Salunke, Advocate for petitioner. Shri. V.D. Rakh, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri. U.B. Bondar, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 and 4. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & SHRIHARI P DAVARE, JJ. DATE: 22nd DECEMBER 2010 PER COURT : 1) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 11 R land would be sufficient and necessary for construction of school building of primary school in Village Tandalwadi whereas, the respondents have constructed school on 5 R land. 2 WP No.2690/2009 2) Learned counsel Shri Bondar submits that the construction of school building is already over. 3) In view of the statement made, no interference is required in exercise of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction under Articled 226 of the Constitution of India. 4) The writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (SHRIHARI P DAVARE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl