REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.354 of 2008 1 .. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.354 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision : April 25, 2008 Bhagwat Swroop .. Appellant v. Smt. Bhuri Devi and others .. Respondents CORAM : Hon`ble Mr. Justice Pritam Pal Present : Shri S.K.Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant. PRITAM PAL, J. This Regular Second Appeal by plianitiff (hereinafter referred to as “the appellant”) is directed against judgment and decree dated 29.9.2001 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Narnaul, whereby a suit for possession on the basis of ownership of a Nohra, as described in the head-note of the plaint, was dismissed. Thereafter, the first appeal filed by the appellant was also dismissed vide judgment and decree dated 9.8.2007 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Narnaul. This is how feeling aggrieved, the appellant has come-up in this appeal. After hearing learned counsel for the appellant and going through the record, it is apparent that both the courts below have given concurrent findings that the plaintiff-appellant has failed to establish the ownership of the suit-property of Smt. Kashi Bai, from whom he (the REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.354 of 2008 2 .. appellant) is stated to have derived right of ownership. The findings arrived at by the courts below in that behalf are based on cogent and convincing evidence. So, the same cannot be held to be unreasonable or perverse in any manner. Moreso, learned counsel for the appellant could not make out any substantial question of law, for consideration by this Court in this Regular Second Appeal. Hence, this Regular Second Appeal is dismissed in limine. [ PRITAM PAL ] April 25, 2008 JUDGE som