@ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR K w.P.msnNo. @O/ /201o w; Q /, PE'MTIONERS 1. Bachan Sai, S/o Shri Kura Sai, aged about 50 years, Working as Head Master, Govt. Primary School, Sisringa, Block — Farshabahar, /, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) . Baiju Ram Bhagat, S/o Shri Somra Ram, aged about 49 years, working as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School Block Pandripani, Farshabahar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS L/State of Chhattisgarh Through :— The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer, School Education Department, Jashpur, Distt— Jashpur (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Block —Farshabahar Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) (or 4. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account 8L Pension Jashpur, Distt.~Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . w 0&9 év/gf It? mm F1200 mmm'q'hiwn WWW WW§WW $aifaqm SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER 28.10.2610 Shn' Shm' Vaibhav Somkan‘i Goverdéan, Vanna cour in s61 for for the the State. petitioners. Th6 pEtih'oners, who wm‘e appointed on th€ post of Assistant Teachers under the Sc‘hool Education Department in are aggrieved by the action of 70 advance increments in their ‘ B.E(i. at their own cost in the ssion for the same from the the year 1988-89 (Annexure Pf 1 the respondents in. not adding tx saiary even though they did thei1 year 2006 after seeking V permj department. Counsel for the petitioner : ;ubmits that the petitioners are entitled for two advance increments as they had obtained B.Ed Examination certificate, in acccrdance with the provisions of Circular dated 24. 12.98 and in View of the judgments of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter olf State of MP. 8r. Another Vs. Badrinarayan Achaiya and others reported in 1996 SC 2779 and Yashwant Kumar Bhardw Durg and. another reported in 20 ij Vs. Municipal Corporation; On the other hand, counsel for the State submits that erstwhile State of Madhya 22.10.1964 allowed advance government servants who proceeded for training up :ost or at the government cost. 22.10.1964 whether at his own However, who proceeded on trail ring on or after 23. 10. 1964 can Lf the training is at his cost and not at the cost of the Government. This circular of dated 36 {m MPJR 96 (CG). Pradesh vide circular dated increments only to those to get two annuai increments only (37 Wm U" ‘QyQyQM/i 111200 o 311%?!m (We) ;’ XLHC 78 o ‘3 W W (We) L mmMwm/o I 4 E200 WWW 3941mm ImmRa&aa w mwawm wmm ve judgment as also circular also squarely covaed by the abc dated 24. 12. 1998. For the aforesaid reasons, lthe petmoners arc entitlsd to torements from the date of Ed. examination result. The ated. to make payment of two toners from the date of their 1 a period of four months from be subject to all veritications pleaded in the petition. to costs. , No order as -thc payment of two advance i declaraijoo of the petitioners B respon&ents are accordingly dire advance increments to the petit passing B.Ed. exammation, withiJ today. However, this order sha1l made by the State regarding facts Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge