CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16064 OF 2007 ---- In the matter of an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973. ---- 1. MANJU DEVI WIFE OF MADAN JHA 2. MADAN JHA @ MADAN KUMAR JHA, SON OF KAILOO JHA @ UDAY KRISHNA JHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BATH, P.S. MADHEPUR, DISTRICT MADHUBANI. ... ... PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. CHANDRA KANT JHA, S/O LATE SHIV KUMAR JHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BELOUCHA, P.S. LAKHNOUR, DIST. MADHUBANI. ... ... OPPOSITE PARTIES. ---- For the Petitioners : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the State : Mr. A.M.P. Mehta, A.P.P. ---- P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ---- Rakesh Kumar,J. Two petitioners, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, have prayed for quashing of an order dated 9.2.2007 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.III, Madhubani in Sessions Trial No.16 of 2007 arising out of Madhepur P.S. Case No.85 of 2006. By the said order, learned Sessions Judge has rejected the petition filed under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for discharge of the petitioners. It is a case for the offence under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in which police, 2 after investigation, submitted charge sheet against the petitioners and other accused persons. At the stage of charge, petition for discharge was filed by both the petitioners and the learned trial Judge, by assigning a detailed reason, has rejected the same. 2. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, had taken the plea that the petitioner no.1 was sister of husband of the deceased and petitioner no.2 is her husband, who was living separately and had no connection with the husband of the deceased. Be that as it may, the matter was thoroughly investigated by the police and thereafter, charge sheet was submitted. 3. I have perused the impugned order. After going through the impugned order, the court is satisfied that the learned trial Judge has rightly rejected the petition. I do not find any merit in the present petition and petition stands rejected. 4. In view of rejection of this petition, interim order of stay dated 29.9.2008 stands automatically vacated. 5. Let a copy of this order be sent 3 to the court below forthwith. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.) PATNA HIGH COURT Dated 8.11.2010 N.A.F.R./N.H.