IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.648 of 2007 MAHARAJ PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4 11.9.2008 This revision application has been filed against the order dated 13.3.2007 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Begusarai in case No. 46M of 1990. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as opposite party. It appears from the record that vide order dated 14.12.2006 the Principal Judge, Family Court, Begusarai enhanced the maintenance amount from Rs.300/- per month to Rs.2500/- per month. The order was passed on contest and no revision was preferred against that order. The said order attained its finality. However, on 13.3.2007 the petitioner filed a petition for revision of the aforesaid order dated 14.12.2006 on the ground that the petitioner is not in a position to pay such a huge amount of maintenance. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well the fact that earlier order dated 14.12.2006 was passed in presence of the petitioner and no revision was preferred against that order, I find no reason to interfere in the order dated 13.3.2007.Accordingly, this revision application stands dismissed. B.Jha (Ghanshyam Prasad)