THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.2023 of 2003 Dated 23rd September, 2010 Between: M.Sudershan Goud @ Kashinathgoud. …Appellant And A.Rajender …Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Mr.Venkateswar Varanasi for Mr.V.Ravi Kiran Rao Counsel for the respondent: ---- The Court made the following: Order: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal arises out of award, dated 24-08-2001, in O.P.No.814 of 1997, on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum- Additional District Judge, Nizamabad (for short ‘the Tribunal’). I have heard Sri Venkateswar Varanasi, learned Counsel representing Sri V.Ravi Kiran Rao, learned Counsel for the appellant. No one appeared for the respondent. The appellant has filed the above-mentioned OP under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, claiming compensation of Rs.2,50,000/- on account of the injuries and fracture sustained by him in the accident involving Hero Honda Motor Cycle bearing registration No.AP 15 F 7185 belonging to the respondent. After considering the entire oral and documentary evidence adduced by the parties, the Tribunal found that the accident has occurred on account of the rash and negligent driving of the rider of the above-said motorcycle. The Tribunal has also considered the nature of the injuries sustained by the appellant and found that Ex.A.2- wound certificate shows that he had sustained fracture injury on his left leg and simple injuries on the left side of his head and left foot. The Tribunal has, accordingly, granted compensation of Rs.25,000/- for the fracture injury and Rs.6,000/- for two simple injuries. The Tribunal has also awarded Rs.10,000/- towards medical bills and extra nourishment on the basis of Exs.A.4 to A.7 and A.11, Rs.5,000 towards further operation charges, Rs.10,000/- towards pain and suffering and Rs.15,000/- for loss of future income. In total, the Tribunal has awarded an amount of Rs.71,000/- towards compensation. On a careful consideration of the award of the Tribunal, I am of the opinion that the Tribunal has made a reasonable approach in assessing the compensation for the injuries suffered by the appellant and no interference is called for in this appeal. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, CMP.No.11173 of 2003 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 23rd September, 2010 lur