IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DECEMBER 2010 / 1ST POUSHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 8259 of 2010() -------------------------- CRIME NO. 941/2010 OF MANNUTHY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR ............................................ PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. HASHIM HAMZA, S/O.HAMEED, PALAKUZHIYIL HOUSE, MUDICKAL P.O., PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. M.M.ABDUL MAJEED, S/O.MAKKAR, MATOOR AKATHOOTTU, THOTTAKKATTUKARA, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.C.K.SYEDMOHAMMED ALI SMT.SHAMINA SALAHUDHEEN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANNUTHY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn V. RAMKUMAR, J. ------------------------ Bail Application No.8259 of 2010 ------------------------------- Dated this the 22 nd day of December, 2010 O R D E R Petitioners seek anticipatory bail on the allegation that the Mannuthy Police are at their heels in connection with Crime No.941/2010 of Mannuthy Police Station. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that all the surviving offences are bailable offences. If so, invocation of Section 438 Cr.P.C. is misconceived. This petition is accordingly dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to seek regular bail from the Magistrate concerned. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. ln