IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 6TH PHALGUNA 1930 RCRev..No. 216 of 2007() ------------------------ RCA.9/2005 of D.C. & SESSIONS COURT,KOLLAM RCP.2/2003 of ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT, KOLLAM .................... REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------------------------- SRINIVASAN, S/O.KUMARAN VAIDHYAN, SREEKRISHNA MANDIRAM, MURUNTHAL, THRIKKADAVOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS ------------------------------------- 1. GIRIJA, W/O.R.GOPALAKRISHNAN PILLAI, MOONNUTHENGIL VEEDU, MURUNTHAL,THRIKKADAVOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. RAJAMMA AMMA, W/O.LATE BALAKRISHNA PILLAI, MOONNUTHENGIL VEEDU, MURUNTHAL, THRIKKADAVOOR, KOLLAM DITRICT. ADV. SRI.V.V.RAJA FOR R1 & 2 SRI.M.T.SURESHKUMAR FOR R1 & 2 THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ R.C.R.No.216 OF 2007 ------------------------ Dated this the 25th day of February, 2009 ORDER Pius C.Kuriakose, J. It is submitted by Sri.Raja, learned counsel for the respondents, that the respondents have already received vacant possession of the building which is subject matter of the RCP. We record the above submission and dispose of this Rent Control Revision Petition without examining the merits of the grounds raised on the basis that the Petition has become infructuous. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE dpk