1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 215 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1543 OF 1988 Sumermal M. Bafna & Ors. ... Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Vineet B. Naik i/by Kantawala & Co. for Petitioner. Mr. R.M. Sawant, A.G.P. for R. No. 1. Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, Sr. advocate i/by Sarang Aradhye for R. No.6. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : 28TH JULY, 2006 DATE : 28TH JULY, 2006 DATE : 28TH JULY, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . On behalf of the Petitioners their learned counsel points out that the Petition itself was disposed of in the year 1992. . It appears that the Petitioners herein had taken out motion being N.M. No. 166opf 2004 in Writ Petition No. 1553 of 1988. That motion was disposed of on the ground that the applicants are not parties and as such it is premature. It must be noted that the attention of this court was not invited to the fact that Petition itself has been disposed of. Considering the above, invoking our inherent power, Order ted 23.7. 2004 in Notice of Motion No. 166 of 2004 is recalled and motion 2 restored. All contentions of the Petitioner and respondents ear left open for consideration. . Chamber summons disposed of accordingly. (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.)