IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 18TH MARCH 2008 / 28TH PHALGUNA 1929 W.P(C).No. 8559 of 2008(R) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- M/S.PALATHUMPATTU SKY JEWELLERY, CHENGANNUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, NINAN JOHN. BY ADV. DR.K.B.MUHAMED KUTTY (SR.) SRI.K.M.FIROZ RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ASSESSMENT), COMMERCIAL TAXES, SPECIAL CIRCLE, ALAPPUZHA. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOLLAM. 3. INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, CHENGANNUR. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. C.K. GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 8559 OF 2008 - R = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 18th day of March, 2008 J U D G M E N T In this writ petition, petitioner submits that against Ext. P1 order of assessment he has filed Ext. P2 appeal and Ext. P3 stay petition. According to the petitioner on account of the absence of a certificate of payment of tax, the stay petition is not considered. Petitioner submits that seeking the issuance of the certificate as above, he has made Exts. P4 to P6 to the 1st respondent and that there has not been any response to the request so made. In the meantime, petitioner is also facing recovery proceedings. In view of the pendency of Exts. P4 to P6 before the 1st respondent, I feel what is required to be done is to direct the 1st respondent to consider the request so made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon. This, the 1st respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 2 weeks of production of production of a W.P.(C)No.8559/2008 - 2 - copy of this judgment. 2. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-