:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.3022 OF 1995 SUIT NO.3022 OF 1995 SUIT NO.3022 OF 1995 JUDGE’S ORDER NO.279 OF 2004 JUDGE’S ORDER NO.279 OF 2004 JUDGE’S ORDER NO.279 OF 2004 Beatrice Diago D’Souza & Ors. ..Plaintiffs. Vs. Numero Uno Projects Ltd. ..Defendants. Mr.Sandip Bhimekar i/b.Wadia Ghandy & Co. for the Plaintiffs. Mr.D.P.Desai for the Defendants. CORAM: S.U.KAMDAR, J. CORAM: S.U.KAMDAR, J. CORAM: S.U.KAMDAR, J. DATED: 22nd DECEMBER, 2004 DATED: 22nd DECEMBER, 2004 DATED: 22nd DECEMBER, 2004 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : In view of the fact that Execution Application is not filed for executing the decree, the present Judge’s Order for implementation of the decree is not maintainable. The Judge’s Order accordingly stands dismissed.