IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19858 of 2010 SANJEET KUMAR @ SANJEET KARMKAR @ SANJEEV KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.6.2010. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is the husband and in custody in connection with Azamnagar P.S.Case No.222 of 2009 for the offences punishable under sections 323, 504,498A, 313 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The present case arises from a complaint case which has subsequently been registered as police case under the provisions of Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned counsel for the petitioner, with reference to the complaint petition which forms part of the first information report, submits that although the marriage had taken place in the year 2004, but until filing of the complaint petition in the year 2009, no allegation has been set out against the petitioner regarding demand of dowry. He submits that the present case is an outcome of an altercation between the mother-in-law and the daughter-in-law and the petitioner has been roped in between their grievances. He further submits that 2 even the allegation of miscarriage has not been found to be true. Taking into consideration the circumstances and the submissions of the learned counsel, let petitioner Sanjeet Kumar alias Sanjeet Karmkar alias Sanjeev Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Azamnagar P.S.Case No.222 of 2009. Before parting with the order, I would like to observe that the court before whom the matter is pending would make all possible efforts for resolution of the dispute between the contesting parties, considering that such issue crops up mainly from a matrimonial discord. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)