IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16333 of 2011 1. BRIJ MOHAN SINGH @ BRIJ MOHAN MAHTO 2. Sobarn Mahto 3. Lakshuman Mahto 4. Ranjeet Mahto @ Ranjeet Singh 5. Sanjeet Mahto 6. Shiva Mahto @ Shiva Kumar 7. Sidhnath Mahto @ Shidhnath Singh 8. Baijnath Mahto @ Baijnath Sah 9. Surendra Mahto @ Surendra Singh 10. Upendra Mahto @ Upendra Singh Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 24.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission is that there is land dispute in between the parties, theft is ornamental and allegation or injuries sustained are not justifying constitution of offence under Section 307 of the I.P.C. Abuse in name of informant’s caste to humiliate the informant is given inside his house not in public view and now, parties have resolved their differences also. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Deokund P.S. Case No. 26 of 2010 above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Daudnager, Aurangabad subject to the 2 conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)