t , IN THE Hh’iH COURT O KARNATIiA AT BANGALOBE I LA TED THI6 THE 8TH I.Y 0? JU!TE 1998 B EFO RE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V,P.MOHAN KUMAR WRIT pETITION NO.15991/1998 BETwEEN: / Ws,Indiaa Coffee Workers Co—operative Society Ltd,, No.528, Avenue Road, Barigalore - 560 002, by it 5 eneral Manager, ,,g TITIONER (By t.suguna R.Reddy, Advocate) A ND: - 1. iumment of India Represented by Secreta ry/Conimi s sioner Department of Labour New Delhi, 2, Employees State Insurance Cooration, Panchadeep havan, Kota Road, New Delhi, represented by it 5 Director enera1. 2 ‘4/ —: 2 :— 3, employees State Insurance Corporation, Regional Office (karnataka), No.10, Binny ields, Binnype t, Bangalore - 560 023, represented by it 5 Deputy Director, 4, The Recovery Officer, E,S,I, Corporation in karnataka, Region No, 10 Binny ‘ields, bangalore - 560 023, 6, ovemrnent of kaa take represented by its Seeretary/ Commissioner, Labour Department, N, ,Building, Bangalore— 1, ,,R35PONDTT$ (By 6ri M,Papanna, for R2 to R4, Advocate, and R—1 is served) This Writ petition filed t’a 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India praying to Direct the ttl to dispose of the application of the peti tioner society seeking exemption from the operation of the provisions of the petitioner society C per letter dt,27—4—98, the t nnex—A1 issued by the Minister of Labour, Govt,, of India, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the peti tioner society and its federation, All India Coffee Workers Co—op, Societies Federation Ltd., and eto, This Writ 1 etition coming on for preli minary hearing this day, the Court made the foil owing:— 3 : 3 :— o RDER The petitioner claims to hve mde an application for exemption i.rider Section 87 of the L&,I, Act, The contention of the petitioner is that such an application made under Section 87 exists in view of reference to be mde in Annex— ure—C3 which is the letter written by him to the authorities concerned referring to the sid appli cation. Unfortuntely that application is not before this Court, rJhen the matter came up on 4,6,1998, it wa adjourned to this date to enable its production, The petitioner has not taken the advantage of thi 5 time granted and produced the application, It is not possible for this Court to adjourn the matter to persuade the petitioner to produce the document, 2. The relief sout for by the petitioner is for juashing of the order passed under Section 45—A of the ,b,I, Act, The petitioner may pursue hi remedy under Section 75 of the . S 5 4/ —: 4 :- I A et, I do not find ny grounds to entertain the writ petition, Dismissed. ksp/ hba/ Sd! JUDGE