(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3857 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3857 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3857 OF 2005 Shahnawaz Ali Akbar Qureshi & Anr ...Applicants Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors ...Respondents ..... Mr. P.C. Kansara i/b Kansara & Thanekar, Advocate for Applicants Mr. M.S.Mhambray, A.P.P. for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 25TH JULY, 2005 DATED: 25TH JULY, 2005 DATED: 25TH JULY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants, the learned A.P.P. for the State and the respondent No.2 i.e. original complainant Smt. Gopi Mohandas Daryanani. 2. The applicants have preferred this application for quashing of proceedings relating to C.R. No. 296 of 2003 at Narpoli police station, District Thane. The said case is under Section 420 r.w. 34 of I.P.C. 3. The respondent No.2 i.e. the original complainant who is present in person has stated that (-2-) the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled and she has no grievance against the applicants. She has further stated that she does not wish to pursue her complaint and the complaint in respect of the applicants be quashed. 4. Looking to the above fact, in my view, no purpose would be achieved in continuing with the proceedings relating to C.R. No.296 of 2003, hence, C.R. No.296 of 2003 and the proceedings relating thereto are quashed. 5. Criminal Application is disposed of. *****