/y^ ,^ 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA3TISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 643 of 2004 K?r p' Petitioner Rajkuxuar Goyal, S/o Goviud Ram., Sharda Enteiprises, Resi of Dham (Near. Janta Union OfB.ee, West-Korba, Tah. Katghora, Distt.-Korba $C.G.) Versus Respondents" 1. President & Sub-T)irector, Electricity Boai-d ofRaipur(C.G.j 2. Superiiiteuduig Engiaeer Civil (Maint.Dept), Electricity Board of DhaiTi, West-Korba, Tah. Katghora, Distt-Korba (C.G.) 3. ' MiLauwar Ali, S/o Kairaui Ali, Aged about 62 vears, Resi of Vffi. Shivalii Mudi Jailgaon, Tah. Katghora, Distt. Korba (C.G.) 4. M.S.Yadav, C/o Gopal Statioaaiy, Resi, ot" H.T.P.P., C.S.E.B. colony (Near Rasiya Aata Chhald) Dharri, Tah. Katghora, Distt. Korba (C.G.). 5. State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector, Korba (C. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CON&nTUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'ble Stui Satish K. Agnihotri J.} Ms Hamida Siddque, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri A. S. Galianvar, Advocate for the respondents No. 1 aad 2. O R DE R (Passed on fhis 13th Day ofAugust, 2008) 1. Leamed couiisel appeai-ing for the petitioner, 00. itistractions, subiuits that tlie petitioner seeks to xvifhdraw Tiiis petition, as this petition has becoiue uifi."uctuous. 2. Learued counsel appeariug for fhe respondents/State has no objection. 3. !n view offh.e above, fhe petition is disinissed as wifhdrawn, as having becoine infructuoiis. Consequenfly, M(W$P No. 572/2004 also dismissed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge