IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8909 of 2009 ARUN KUMAR @ BABLOO,son of late Jairam Prasad, resident of village-Rudauli,P.S.- Bajapatti,District-Sitamarhi. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 10-04-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there was dispute in between two sets of people on the point of fencing of a graveyard. A title suit was pending for declaration of the passage through graveyard and some order was also passed, even then the Administration was adamant to obstruct the passage by constructing the wall. So, the act of the Administration was objected by the villagers (male and female). Force was also used, which caused injury to the protested persons including females, even then alleging about injury received by the police personnel and about setting fire to the straw and thatched houses etc. this false case has been lodged. I find smell of the violence in the protest. If the alleged act justifies any plea of the petitioner that can easily be considered by the trial court where the case is pending. I do not find it a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this petition for anticipatory bail is rejected. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )