IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'I‘TISGARH : BILASPUR W.P. No. 1579 of2004 Pctitioner Sanjay Tagax, S[o R. S. Tagar, aged about 30 yaars, Assistant Teacher, R/c House No. 9/899, Bharfi Nagar, Bilasp'ur, District Bilaspur (CG) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, School Educau‘on Department, D. K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (CG). State of Madhya Pradcsh, Through the Secretary, School Education Department, Vallabh Bhavan, Bhopal (M.P.). 2. 3. The Dixector of Public Instructions, State of C.G. Raipur (CG) 4. The’Director of Public Instructions, State of M.P. Bhopal (M.P.) 5. The District Education Ohicer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 6. The District Education Ohicer, Shivpun', District Shivp‘uri (M.P.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF‘ INDIA (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotn' J.) Ms. Falah Minhaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Shn‘ Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the respondents No. 1, 3 and 5. ORDER (Passed on this 17th Day of March, 2009) 1. The petitioner has flied this petition challenging the non’ce dated 4.6.2004 (Annexure P/ 8), whereby the petitioner was directed to show cause asto Why his services may not be terminated in View of the order dated 1.5.2003, passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Gwalior in W.P.No. 4OI2000 (Yashwant Kumar Ahirwar Vs. State of Madhya Pradbsh and others). 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner Submits that in View of the interim order dated 23.6.2004 passed by this Court, the petitioner is still continuing on the post of Assistant Teacher. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State submits that the petitioner has nled this petition challenging the show M cause notice. The petitioner should have med reply to the Show cause notice before approaching this Court. He further submits that if reply is $ed by the petitioner Within a peliod of one Week, the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law, by the competent authority within a further period of four weeks and till then no steps to remove the petitioner shall be taken. 1l\ 4. In View of the foregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this matter for adjudication, at this stage. In View of the above, this petition stands disposed of With liberty to the petitioner to tile reply to the show cause notice before the concerned authority, within a period of one week from today, which may be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law, within a further period of four weeks, thereafter. 6. It is directed that if reply, as above, is filed by the petitioner withing period of one week hom today, the interim order dated 23.6.2004 passed by this Court shall continue till the decision is taken by the concerned authority. ‘Consequently, M(W)P No. 1408/ 2004 standsdisposed of. No order asto costs. g \ a. r Sd/— -& Satish K. Agnimm Judge Thakur i