IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15137 of 2008 MD.ALI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6 2.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. There is no dispute on the basic facts borne out from annexure-7 that for completion of work for the extended period granted to the petitioner was 30.6.2002. The work stands completed many many months thereafter if not a year. Some kind of wishy-washy material has been brought on record that again extension was granted to the petitioner but there is no categorical evidence in this regard. Learned Additional Advocate General-11 brings to my notice the condition of the contract, specially clause-2 where there is provision for making deductions from the bills of the contractor if there is delay in completion of the project at the rate of ½ percent per day and maximum of 10 percent. With the stand of the respondents that if this condition has been enforced for delay in completion of the work, there is nothing payable to the petitioner seems to be inconsonance with the agreement. No order is required to be passed directing the respondents to make any payment to the petitioner on this accord. If there is any other claim or if the final accounting is not in order he can purse the same with the concerned authority. This writ application stands dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)