IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. APPLICANT P.R. Mo..... Ptesented.....^?1^4— dbyShri^.'^tefc ^Xf... ftft^f^tit^ N0 APPLICANTS Cr.M.P.NO. 5~^7- /II Mahavir Prasad Agrawal S/o Late Jagat Ram Agrawal Aged about 52 years R/o Ambikapur road, Patthalgaon, Distt.- Jashpur, C.G. VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through -The Secretary, Forest department D.K.S. Bhavan Raipur C.G. 2. The Prescribed Authority -cum- Sub Divisional Officer Forest Dharamjaygarh Distt- Raigarh,C.G. APPLICATION U/S 482 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDU^E CODE 1973 "%.. ¥te<<rf'^<^ an^I'^T'^IW fflT 3I^?1 WIW K.i L/espti HWW gitflw '3^' «i)l<4|(vl4, ^Tll<'-l'|io, fsldiy^-!: .y^>.:..^.^tL!l 200 3TI^?T 'T^q? (Tp^si^q^ ?'RiraT ^ifcr an^i SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mo v^°4?^-A Shri Raj Kumar Gupta, coi Shri Rakesh Jha, Deputy In view 'of the decision or uhnattjsgarh Jn Cr.M.P. No Cr.M.P. No.1 petiiioner nas tifed mis pemion for interim custody and the proceedings under Section 53 o? custoa'y has been rejected. Therefore, this petition is the petitioner to take recourse to against impugned order rejecting c l[cT<)ln iff^rlT ^f 1^T^ if^^K '^sifitHsii^r >an snnvastava, 4, 'nsel for the petitloner. iovernment Advocate for the State. nis Court in the case of Janakram vs. State of B23/10 and Sandeep Si vs. State ot ?m. tnis petition is not maintenaDie, as me aainst the order reiecting petitioners apDiication rder passed by the confiscating authority in the Forest Act wherein the application for interim iismissed as not mainienable reserving liberty to remedy as may be avaiiabie to him under the iaw the appiication for interim custody. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge tna^hi ^itragawigir, iTiHWTrif—i's/i40—i/ioii— i ,50,000.