IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16978 of 2010 1. DAYANAND MANJHI 2. Ram Bahadur Manjhi 3. Ambika Chaudhary Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 21.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are accused in a case under Sections 302 and 201/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners have not been identified in the Test Identification Parade. He submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from their possession. It is further submitted that no witness has been examined for last one year. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, if the trial does not conclude within a period of six months, the petitioners are at liberty to renew their prayer for bail. The trial Court is also directed to conclude the trial possibly within six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Anand Kr. (S. P. Singh, J.)