;. •'^.•a's-"'-^*''-'' >• v'.:'".,-- ..-•' ._t SINGIEBENCH c.^, INTHEHIGH BH.ASPUR WntDetitionNo'2'7'?L^-/2006 PETmONAR ^'^ Krishna Shekdar S/OLate Lekdar, aged-59 years, Post- Teacher, posted at primary ^y ^'^.- y' RESPONDENTS r^ sy o^ ^ \.o ^ ^, ./•••''^^' school, Manendragarh, i (o&sz<- ^'^••""" District- Korea(C.G.) ..••'tCC\"" .•••' ...•••''^^..-••" VERSUS ,< 1. StateofChhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of school education, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ., 2. The Collector Korea- Baikunthpur, District- Baikunfhpur (C.G.) •ifc ^^ vto^ ^y "^- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE 1. CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIQNAR :- d XI-HC-78 an^T^irR-ti'b craT3I]^Tst>HI<t) *ii*iwi ai*iich 3^T'^rai?ra', ®Tnu'ic,fSicii^y ^^:^^ • W3[ 200 ai 1^14d* (li°i(3's"<eT) ^gTW^tTsn^T ^<iFyi<fl-f ^iKdT^fe1^ ^+^K ^ail^Ta.n^r 2-8-2006 Mr. Sudhir Verma, counse| for the petitioner. Miss Deepali Pandey, Par(el Lawyer for the State/respondents, on advance copy. Heard both the counsel. By this writ petition undejr Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has questiorled legality and correctness of the order dated 7-7-2006 passed by resp<] ndent No.2, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Primary S|chool, Manendragarh to Middle School, Ghutra, Manendragarh. Main grievance of the pe|:itioner is that he has been transferred from general school to tribal sc^ool, which is fuflSisBC^, controlled and run by the Tribal Department. An|other ground is that the petitioner is 40% handicapped person and he whereas, medical facilities are n ^ taking treatment at Manendragarh, )t availabte at Ghufra which is about 50 kms. awayfrom Manendragarh. Learned counsel for l|he petitioner submits that in the ^ be allowed to make a representation to ;ted to decide the same, to which learned tspondents has no objection. tisel for the parties, having regard to the circumstances, the petitioner ma} respondent No.2 and he be direc] counsel appearing for the State/r^ Having heard leamed coui on the merits of the case, the f. petitioner is just, fair and reasone to make a representation alon; directed to decide the represental facts and circumstances of the cjase and without expressing any opinion [rayer made by learned counsel for the |ble. Therefore, the petitioneris allowed t| with a copy of this writ petition to respondent No.2 within 10 days fr|om today and in turn, respondent No.2 is ion of the petitioner within a period of 30 P.T.O. Wf's'wesSS'itSS!!aiiS; XI-HC-78 *11HMI ShHTcb TS? ^ll'yld'il, ®Tn+f'16,[sfMI'M^'l. .^:T:.^.^.. Wt sn^r'rag? ('iai^q^) sTi^r^rR-fi* (raTsn^TstiH "c' Soma ?TdTWHf6!r3n^r days from the date of its receipt, ^ the petitioner in an objective With the direction aforesaid Consequently, M.(W.)P.N<< stand disposed of. Parties are entitled for certif ^fter considering the objections raised by mani|ier, in accordance with law. the petition stands disposed of. l.2911/20re and I.A.No.7157/2006 also ctii^fd'ifl-< WRrf ff fscfs Tf^Rzre • ^sri^q'a.n^r ed copy of this order. Se'f- L.C. Bl'sSeo ^ P.T.O. 'db t! k-