Q) CA3 \m$‘ maw 3£Nim IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER 1r RESPONDENTS, BR. Gupta, S/o Rambrichh Gupfa, (Re‘rd. Employee) aged abouT 62 years, R/o Village— KanTi Prakashpur', Posf and Tahsil Ambikapur, Disf’r. Surguja (6.6.) VER5US StaTe of Chhah‘isgarh, Through: Secretary, Public Health Deparfmen‘r, Manfralaya, D.K.$. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. o” The Senior Account Officer, Through: Office of Accounfan’r General, Raipur, Disfric’r : Raipur‘ (6.6.). 3. ’“v The Disfricf Treasurer Officer, Ambikapur, Surguja, Disfricf: / Surguja (6.6.). 4. Chief Medical and Healfh Officer, Ambikapur, Disff. Surguja (C.G.) Block Medical Officer, Public Healfh Cenfre, Bhafauli, Tahsil Ambikapur, Disff. Surguja (C.G.) / 5. WRIT PETITION UNDER AR‘ITCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. The pefifioner named above, mosf humbly and respecffully begs f0 submif as under:- w.P.(s)No. %*l /2o11 V7) HKBH COURT OF CHHATTtSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 884 0f 20H WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Prashan‘t Kumar Mishra. J. Present: Shri Pushpendra Patel, AdvocaTe far the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advacate General far the $Tate. ORDER WRAL) (Passed on 14‘“ day of February, 201 1) 1. Learned counsei appearing for the petitiener submits that the case. being payment of retiral benefits matter, may be referred to The pension camméttee. 2. This Court in the matter of WP. No. 4642/2004 (Baiinath Manda! v. The State of Chham'sgarh & Others) and other connected maiters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were invoived. The Commitiee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in WP. No. 1981/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar v. State Govammerrt and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in MCC. No. 105 of 2008 (State of tibiiaitisga'rh & Others v. Baljfnaff‘: Manda! and another). Thus. this petition is squareiy covered by the judgment and order dated 313: of January, 2008 passed in WP. No, 4642/2004 Baynatt'; Manda! (sapra) as submitted by teamed counsei appearing for the parties. 3. This petition is accordingty disposed of in the same terms Le. the ofnce of the Advocate Genera! is directed to send the case to the .Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a {copy of the petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the PET‘ETIONER : BR. Gupta VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1 State of Chha‘disgarh 84 Others Committee shat} iSSue notice to the petitmner and the officers concerned: within a further per§od 0%” 15 days‘ The Committee, shall consider and pass order. in accordance with Saw, after affording proper oppofcunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petiticner and the officers concerned may file additional documents, if necessary. The entrre exercise, incrudmg payment of retiral dues: if any: to the petitioner be compieted within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shaii suppiy extra copy of the petition to the learned counsel appearing for the respondents for forwarding the same to the o Committee. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge