1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application (CAZ) No. 577 of 2009 in L.P.A. (Stamp) No. 11494/2009 in Writ Petition No. 1501 of 2009 (D) Laxman Ramaji Rangari ...VERSUS... Nardas Ramaji Rangari =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==- Mr. M.R.Kalar, Advocate for the applicant/appellant. Mr. M.R.Zoharapurkar, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Mr. K.M.Kuthe, Advocate for respondent nos.3 & 4 C ORAM : D.B.BHOSALE ; and PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATED : 25th June, 2010. Civil Application (CAZ) No. 577 of 2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this civil application, the applicants have prayed for condonation of delay of 80 days caused in filing the Letters Patent Appeal. By consent, the civil application is allowed. L. P. A. (Stamp) No. 11494/2009 By consent of the parties, the Letters Patent Appeal is taken up for hearing. We have heard learned counsel for the appellants. This L.P.A. is directed against the order, passed by the learned Single Judge, dated 08/4/2009 disposing of 2 the writ petition filed by the appellants. In the writ petition, the appellants were seeking direction to the appellate court to decide their applications for production of documents and for initiating contempt of court action against respondent no.1. This court while disposing of the writ petition, directed the appellate court to decide the applications either before deciding the appeal or at the time of decision of the appeal itself. We do not find anything wrong in the impugned order. No ground whatsoever is made out for interfering with the same. Hence, Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE Diwale