Crl.M.No.M-11274 of 2011(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-11274 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: May 31, 2011 Piara .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Johan Kumar, Advocate for Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Vikas Malik, AAG, Haryana. ..... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.51, dated 29.8.2010, under Sections 306/34 IPC, registered at Police Station GRP Karnal, District Karnal. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the case of present petitioner is similar to co-accused Rekha, who is wife of deceased, who has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 4.4.2011, passed in Crl.M.No.M-5719 of 2011. It is further contended that petitioner is maternal uncle of Rekha, co-accused, and he has been continuing in custody since 4.10.2010. It is also contended that from the allegations in the FIR, no prima facie case is made out against him. It is also contended that material witnesses have already been examined. Crl.M.No.M-11274 of 2011(O&M) -2- Bail application has been opposed on behalf of learned State counsel on the ground that allegations are serious in nature. However, he has not disputed that the main witnesses, i.e., complainant and a Medical Officer have already been examined. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. In view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner-Piara for grant of regular bail is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Karnal. 31.5.2011 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge