IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7031 of 2011 AJAY YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 06.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the FIR, and admittedly, the informant has not seen the actual killing of the deceased. In course of investigation, it came to light that deceased was talking to someone on mobile phone prior to the alleged occurrence and when the aforesaid call details were taken out, it came to light that the aforesaid mobile set belonged to one Darogi Prasad. When police interrogated the aforesaid Darogi Prasad, he disclosed that petitioner had snatched his mobile phone prior to the alleged occurrence and he used the aforesaid mobile phone, and on the basis of aforesaid material, the petitioner has been made accused in this case. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Ajay Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Laheri P.S. Case No.40 of 2010. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)