IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 12TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 21ST KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 31797 of 2010(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.D.ANTONY, KOPPULLY HOUSE, KALLETUMKARA, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR, PIN-680003. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI K C SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 31797 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 12th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner who is an existing stage carriage operator submitted an application for variation of the conditions of the permit. The said application was allowed as per Ext.P1 subject to settlement of timings. Since, the timings were not settled based on Ext.P1, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P2 representation before the respondent. In fact, Ext.P2 is submitted for the purpose of settlement of timings in terms of Ext.P1. Evidently, as per Ext.P1 request of the petitioner for variation of the conditions of permit was granted subject to settlement of timings by the RTA. Therefore, the respondent is bound to settle the timings as ordered in Ext.P1. In the circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to settle the timings as ordered in Ext.P1, taking in to account Ext.P2, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment with notice to the petitioner and other operators on the route. Sd/- (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge