1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2418 OF 2010 Kashinath Sadashiv Thete .. Petitioner. Versus Narayan Dagdu Sanas & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.P.B.Shah for the petitioner. Mr.S.D.Rayrikar AGP for the State. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : APRIL 19, 2011. PC: 1. Mr.Shah, learned counsel does not dispute that against the impugned order the petitioner has filed an appeal before the Addl. Divisional Commissioner, Pune. In that view of the matter I am not inclined to interfere in this petition in the extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2. Looking into the petitioner’s age and the nature of dispute the Addl. Divisional Commissioner, Pune is however, directed to dispose of the petitioner’s appeal being RTS/Pune/222/2009 as expeditiously as possible and preferrably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order. With the above observations the petition is disposed of. (RANJIT MORE, J.) S