1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.8 OF 2006 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.3447 OF 2004 Nilvi and Co. ...Plaintiff vs. Unique Chemicals. ...Defendant. --- Mr.S.S.Kudalkar, for Plaintiff. None for Defendant. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. DATED: 8th June, 2006. P.C.:- 1. The plaintiff has filed the suit for recovery of the amount on the basis of the cheque which was issued by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff which was dishonoured. The defendant has been served with the summons for judgment. The affidavit of service has been filed. The defendant has not filed any application for leave to defend the 2 suit. In the absence of any application for leave to defend the suit, in terms of Order 37 of C.P.C. the plaintiff is entitled to a decree. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the plaintiff. Perused the record. Summons for judgment is granted. The suit is decreed in terms of prayer clause (a), (b) and (c). Refund of Court fees as per rules. ---