IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH MAY 2010 / 29TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 14882 of 2010(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. JESSY MON C.PHILIP, KOTTACKEL HOUSE, KARAPPUZHA KARA, KOTTAYAM. 2. MON C.PHILIP, DO. DO. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN SRI.GEORGE MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KOTTAYAM MUNICIPALITY, KOTTAYAM-686001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. K.RAMAKRISHNAN, ASHA BHAVAN, THIRUNAKKARA, KOTTAYAM. (MANAGING PARTNER, NARMADA, KOTTAYAM). ADV. SRI.SIBY MATHEW FOR R1 SRI.PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU FOR R1 SRI.B.PREMNATH (E) FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 14882 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 19th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioners complain of a construction by the 2nd respondent allegedly in violation of the building rules and permit issued to the 2nd respondent by the 1st respondent for such construction. Detailing the petitioners' grievances, the petitioners have filed Ext.P5 representation before the 1st respondent. The petitioners seek a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 expeditiously. 2. In the nature of the order I propose to pass, I do not think it necessary to issue notice to the respondents at this juncture. 3. After hearing the counsel for the petitioners, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioners and the 2nd respondent as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2