IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31945 of 2011 Mantu Yadav @ Raj Kumar Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 15.10.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 406, 384, 323,504, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the petitioner executed a power of attorney with regard to his land in favour of the informant on 03.10.2005 and in lieu of that certain payments were made by the informant to the petitioner. Subsequently, the petitioner cancelled the power of attorney but money was not returned. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that prior to present case the petitioner lodged the complaint under Sections 420 and 406 of the I.P.C. and Section 138 of N. I. Act against the present informant. Considering the nature of accusation and case lodged prior in time by the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, 2 be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Rampur P.S. Case No. 90 of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)