IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.146 of 2008 MD.SHOAIB KHAN ……..Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RASID KAMAL @ NIRALE 3. NIPPU SINGH @ NIPPU KUMAR SINGH …….Opposite parties ----------- 2. 25.11.2008. This Cr. Revision has been filed against the order of acquittal dated 19.12.2007 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-III, Motihari in Sessions Trial No. 345 of 2005/273 of 2007. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State. The only submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the court below has recorded the verdict of acquittal without examination of I. O. and the informant. However, on perusal of the impugned judgment it appears that six witnesses were examined in course of trial. All witnesses turned hostile. Not a single witness supported the allegation against the accused persons. Efforts were also taken for examination of I. O. and the informant but they did not turn up. Ultimately, the prosecution evidence was closed. Under the facts and circumstances, no case is made out for interference in the impugned order of acquittal. Accordingly, this Cr. Revision is dismissed at the admission stage itself. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)