(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 125 OF 2011 Prashant s/o. Vasant Bhange & 2 others. .. Petitioners. versus Pallavi w/o. Pramod Rekhi & 3 others. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. A.S. Bajaj, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mrs. V.A. Shinde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.4. ........................ CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 11TH JANUARY 2011 (2) COURT'S ORDER : 1. Mr. A.S. Bajaj, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, is attempting to point out some inconsistent orders passed by the revenue authorities in the matter of mutation entries. He contends that the Civil Suit is already pending. 2. Mrs. V.A. Shinde, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondent no.4, has pointed out that the cause for filing the present petition is rejection of interim order passed by respondent no.4 / Additional Commissioner, in revision under Section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. 3. It is apparent that when Civil Suit is pending, entries found in revenue record for fiscal purposes are not determinative. However, as the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners has attempted to point out some inconsistent orders, it would be appropriate to keep the issue open for consideration in the revision which is pending. 4. The respondent no.4 / revisional authority is directed to decide the revision itself, as early as possible and in any case, within a period of two months from the date of communication (3) of this order. 5. With these directions and keeping all the contentions open, the petition is disposed of. No costs. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp125