J i I ~ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPU E WRIT bETITiON‘1sx No.5136 OF 2&08 PETWIONERS 1. Thanda Pradhan, Ram aged Pradhan, abo‘ 5O Sic years, Late Upper Bhuru Division Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary School. Sariya. Biocii Baramkeia, Distric Raigarh (CG). ' Ll d 2. Radhe Shyam Pradhan, Slo Shri Arjun a ' Pradhan, aged aboiut 47 years, Hea Master, Govt. Middlle Schooi, Jalgarh, Block Baramkeia, Dietrict Raigarh (CG). 3. Gadarai Patel, S/o Shri Douiat Ram Patei. aged about 47 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Baigindih, Block Baramkela, District Raigarh (CG). Versus 'NTS 1. State or Chhaniegarh, through the Secretary. Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). The Assistant Gommissianer, riba Welfare Department, Raigarh, Distric Raigarh (CG). n instructios he Director, :Pubiic T Department, Raipur’ (CG). I The District Education Officer, isric Raigarh (CG). ¥ _‘,Block' Education: fficer, Baramkeia District Raigarh (CG). 4. 5. Writ petition under Articie 226 of the-Constitution f india)’ g‘singte Bench : Hon‘fbte shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. - Shn Gamay Patel, counsel for the petitioners. Present Shri Yashwant .Singih Thakur.‘ Dy. Advocate General with Ms. sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer forthe Statelresp’on'dents. . _ ORAL ORDER p V (Passed on this 15‘“ day of September, 2008) _ With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the partis,,_the petition is heard tinaily. 2) Learned counsel appearing or the peioner sunits a/ petitioners do not want to press this petitiOn. on merits, at this stage. However», learned counsel submitsthat the caseis squarely‘covered b order dated 24—8-1992passed by the Madhya Pradesh Slate Administrativ R t RESPONdE Tl t Dtt O , ( o e ‘ ’ f tits b’i thtthe y e i t Tnbunal Jabalpur m QA No 274511989 (Madhukant Vadu and 56 Others Vs State of M P and Others) The said order passed by the Tnbunal has been taken to the Supreme Calm and the Supreme Court was pleased to conmm the order passed by the Tribunal by order dated 3-1 1994 1n S L P (C) No 6892/93 Shn Patel submits that the petitioners have made representahons dated 5-11-2006 6-12-2006 & 25—8-2006 (Annexure-P/z) before the Coliector (AJAK Branch) Ralgarh but the authorities concerned have not taken any decrslon on the sand representations. 3) Shrl Yashwant Stngh Thakur learned Dy Advocate Generat appearing With Ms Sumta Jam Panel Lawyer for the State submits that the pending representattons dated 5-11—2006 6-12—2006 & 25—8-2006 (Annexure-P/2) shall be consrdered and decided by the concerned authority In accordance wrth law on Its own merits Wlthm a period of six ‘ 1 ‘ weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order ‘ 4) In View of the foregomg, according to learned counsel for the S ‘ petitioners nothing survwes In the matter Accordmgly, the petmon stands disposed of. \ Sd/_ /\ Gowri