Co.App. 6/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR A.K.GOEL HON’BLE MR JUSTICE C. R. SARMA This appeal has been preferred under Section 10-F of the Companies Act, 1956, re ad with Section 9 of the Companies(Court) Rules, 1959. By the impugned order, direction has been issued regarding filing of rep lies by different parties. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that permitting filing of sepa rate reply by the respondents was unfair. We are of the view that whether or not filing of separate reply has caus ed prejudice to the appellant is a matter that can be seen at the stage of final hearing. At this stage, no prejudice can be said to have been caused, irrespect ive of merits of the case. No interference of this Court is called for with the impugned order. The appeal is dismissed.