smw c^- '-zrs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. (S) No. 3-7 / 2001^ PETITIONER L°^ ^9. ,^y ^•••cV<y '/^l''^" ^w" ,.--\^y Jeewan Lal Sinha, S/o. Shri Roop Singh Sinha, aged about 37 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School -Anjora, Block - Magarload, Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) ^ <y ^ <^^' VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ r,0^. s^^^ ^^ y^ ^ State of Chhattisgarh & Others Through- The Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Block - Magarload Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) fe'--.."! WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT. WRITS. DLRECTION ETC TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. HB3H_COURTOFJ;HHATTISGARHATBILASPUR SINOLEBENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. PeUttoner Responctents Pefittener Respondents PeBtfoner R^pondents Petitkmer Respondenls Petigoner Resoondents WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.97 OF 2007 Jeewan Lal Sinha sresiLs State of ChhatUsgarh and others WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.98 OF 2007 Chandrahas Shandil^i versus State of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.107 OF 2007 Mani Ram Sidar yersus State <rf ChhatUsgarh and others WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.108 OF 2007 Ram LalJagat versus State of Chhattisgarh and others And WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.109 OF 2007 Dwij Ram Dhruw versys State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. A.S. Rajput, counsel for the petitioner(s). Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyerfor the State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on 16th DayofJanuary, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitionere as well as for the siate/respondwts jointly submit that the facls and quesfion of law inwlved in the present batch of writ pefitions are squarely covered by the decision of this •^ Court in the case of in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaf vs. IVktiwf^sal Cwpof» m,Durg and anoth^ . 2. In subsequent cases, i.e.. Writ PeUtion (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Venna vs. The State Gwrt. of ChhaWsgaifi and anothei) and ather connected matters, decided by this Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant to tfie memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in Educatton Examination, it was clarified that the nomenclature of the Baste Training InsUtute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Diptoma in EducaBon, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certiffcate holders are also covered bythe decisten in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Venna vs. The State Govfc afChhaWsgarh and smattiw) (Supra). 3. For Bie aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decisfon of this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kwnar WwFadwaj (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.EdTB.T.ITD.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-19% and further whether they have been paid two advance incremente or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of ftis order be placed on the record of the connected writ petih'ons. __— — — sd/- Satish K. Agnihutri Judge iublash 1 2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96