IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 8852 of 2008. Decided on 8th December, 2010. _____________________________________________________ Kamlesh Kumar. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Ms. Kiran Dhiman, Advocate vice Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For respondent No. 3. : Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate. Respondent No. 4 is already exparte. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Ajay Chandel, learned counsel for respondent No. 3 submits that the petitioner is not working with the Nagar Panchayat, Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Consequently, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Disposed of as infructuous. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 08, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No.