In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CWP No. 3543 of 2006 Date of decision: 21.4.2008 Parbhu ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.Adarsh Jain, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Palika Monga, AAG, Haryana. **** JUDGMENT M.M.KUMAR, J. This petition is directed against the notifications dated 27.11.2003 and 24.11.2004 issued under Section 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity 'the Act') (Annexure P-1 and P-7 respectively). Learned State counsel has filed an affidavit of Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Estate, Gurgaon. Along with the affidavit, the details of land in dispute, which is subject matter of notifications under challnge, has also been given in Annexure R-1. According to Annexure R-1, the area comprised in Khasra No 356 CWP No. 3543 of 2006 -2- has been found to be vacant and cannot be released from acquisition. The rest of the land has been released from acquisition. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we do not find any illegality in the acquisition proceedings. The objections filed by the petitioner have been considered and the land belonging to him has been released and only small portion has been acquired, which appears to be necessary for the execution of plan. Accordingly we dispose of the writ petition in terms of the concession given by the State. (M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE (SABINA) April 21, 2008 JUDGE anita