IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2045 of 2008 MEENA CHOUDHARY & ANR Versus DR. DILIP CHOUDHARY & ORS With C.R. No.2098 of 2006 MD.SALAHUDDIN Versus MD.IMRAN & ANR ----------- 06/ 27.10.2009 In view of recent judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of State of Punjab and another.Vrs. Jalour Singh and others reported in (2008) 2 Supreme Court Cases 660, we are of the view that challenge to the award of the Lok Adalat made in these two civil revisions should be through petitions under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India. Hence the parties are to treat these two applications as petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and come ready for argument on merits on the next date. Learned counsel for the petitioner should make necessary correction and convert the applications under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by making necessary amendments by tomorrow. Since the cases have been admitted for hearing and the respondents have already appeared after notice, the converted writ 2 petitions shall be listed for hearing as per convenience of the parties and both the writ petitions need not be treated as analogous any more. The writ petition arising out of Civil Revision No. 2098 of 2006 (Md.Salahuddin Vrs. Md.Imran and another) should be listed as first case subject to part heard on 10th November, 2009 as prayed for on behalf of the respondents with consent. The other matter arising out of Civil Revision No. 2045 of 2008 (Meena Choudhary and Ors.Vrs.Dr.Dilip Choudhary and others) should be listed as first case subject to part heard on 3rd November,2009. Copy of the amended writ petitions should be served in the office of Advocate General, Bihar and receipt showing service should be filed in office by 30th October,2009. Let the name of State counsel appear in the list thereafter. (Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ.) Tahir/- (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)