1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.766/2010 Bhoj Raj Singh. vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date : 8.2.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Sandeep Shah, for the petitioner. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner was found guilty for remaining absent for 330 days. A preliminary enquiry was conducted and the petitioner was found guilty in the preliminary enquiry. The disciplinary authority in its order dated 29.4.2004 concurred with the findings recorded by the enquiry officer and before the disciplinary authority, the petitioner did not appear. The contention of the petitioner is that he did not appear before the disciplinary authority as notice was not served upon him whereas the facts recorded in the order of the disciplinary authority clearly reveals that the petitioner had notice of hearing before the disciplinary authority. The disciplinary authority has considered each charge separately and recorded the finding, therefore, I do not find any substance in the contention of the petitioner that 2 the order passed by the disciplinary authority was not a reasoned order or has been passed by ignoring evidence. The petitioner tried to justify his absence with the help of some medical prescriptions but I do not find that the skin disease was of such nature that the petitioner could have avoided the departmental proceedings. In view of the above, this writ petition, having no merits, is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya