IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH APRIL 2008 / 20TH CHAITHRA 1930 W.A.No. 869 of 2008 --------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.8687/2008 DATED 28/03/2008 .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER:- ------------------------------------- RAJESH PRABHU, S/O.RAMADAS PRABHU, AGED 42, INDRADHANUS APARTMENTS, T.D.ROAD, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SMT.R.RANJINI SRI.S.RENJITH RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:- ----------------------------------------------- 1. TAHSILDAR, OFFICE OF THE THASILDAR, (ASSESSING AUTHORITY) UNDER KERALA BUILDING TAX ACT, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM. 2. VILLAGE OFFICER, ERNAKULAM VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM. BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MUHAMMED RAFIQ THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.M.JOSEPH, J. ------------------------------------------------------ W.A.No.869 of 2008 ------------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 9th day of April, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. What was questioned before the learned Single Judge is the order passed by the Tahasildar, Kanayanoor dated 24-1-2008 under the provisions of the Kerala Building Tax Act. (2). In our opinion, if for any reason the appellant/petitioner is aggrieved by that order, he is expected to question the same before the first appellate authority. That is what the learned Single Judge has observed while disposing of the writ petition. We find no error in the orders passed by the learned Single Judge which calls for our interference. Therefore, the writ appeal requires to be rejected and it is rejected. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE MS