THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR SECOND APPEAL NOS.128 & 134 OF 1999 DT.19.08.2010 Between: S.A.NO.128 OF 1999: Tangella Ranga Rao and another ……..Appellants Vs. Lakkavarapu Papamma and seven others ……………..Respondents S.A.NO.134 OF 1999: Tangella Ranga Rao ……Appellant Vs. Lakkavarapu Papamma and five others. ……………..Respondents. JUDGMENT: It is represented that respondent No.1, who is the contesting respondent in both the appeals died two years back and other respondents are only proforma respondents. Admittedly, no steps have been taken to bring the Legal Representatives of respondent No.1 on record. Therefore, for not taking any steps, the appeals are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ B.CHANDRA KUMAR J., Dt.19.08.2010 tjs