IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 1922 of 2010 Date of Decision: 4.2.2010. Shiv Ram --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.S. Kundu, Addl. A.G., Haryana has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents-State. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioner was appointed as Clerk on 20.11.1974. He was promoted as Assistant on 7.9.1980 and thereafter as Deputy Superintendent on 6.9.2006. It is submitted that the petitioner is eligible for promotion to the post of Superintendent and his case was also recommended. However, one Vinod Kumar is creating obstacles and on that basis petitioner's claim for promotion has not been considered. Petitioner has also sought relief for payment of 2nd A.C.P and L.T.C. He has made three representations (Annexures P-1 to P-3) but no decision has been taken thereon till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the representations of the petitioner, referred to above. CWP. No. 1922 of 2010 -2- In view of the above, this petition is, accordingly, disposed of with a direction to the respondents to take decision on the representations of the petitioners within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the competent authority. Needless to say that in the event, the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 4.2.2010. lucky