THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos. 5223 of 2008, 5227 of 2008 and 5481 of 2008 COMMN ORDER: 1. These Civil Revision Petitions are filed challenging the Common Order dated 14.11.2008 in I.A. Nos. 1179 of 2008, 1180 of 2008 and 1181 of 2008, all in O.S. No.916 of 2007 on the file of the XI Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabad, whereunder and whereby petitions filed to reopen the suit; grant leave to file certain documents for the purpose of proving boundaries of the plaint schedule property; and to recall P.W.2 for the purpose of marking those documents, were dismissed. 2. Since all the revisions arise out of common order, they are being taken up for disposal together. 3. Heard both sides. 4. The petitioner herein, who is plaintiff, filed Original Suit No.916 of 2007 on the file of the XI Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabad against the respondents/defendants for perpetual injunction. So, at this stage, the incidental title of the plaintiff and whether she is in possession of the schedule property or not, have to be looked into by the trial Court. A specific plea has been taken by the respondents/defendants denying identity of the location of schedule plot. In such a case, the plaintiff has not chosen to examine any witness nor produced any documents in this regard. Identity of the property is in dispute. In order to prove the identity of the property, certain registered documents, wherein P.W.2 attested the documents, are necessary. So, proper explanation was given by the petitioner for not filing the petition earlier. Therefore, one more opportunity can be given to the petitioner so that the issue can be resolved once for all. 5. In the result, the impugned common order is set aside and the petitions filed by the petitioner/plaintiff are allowed. The trial court shall fix a date for recalling P.W.2 for marking of the documents and also he shall be tendered for cross-examination. It is made clear that except speaking about the documents now sought to be received, he cannot be allowed to speak any other evidence. Thereafter, the suit shall be disposed of in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of closure of the evidence. 6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petitions are allowed. No costs. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 1.2.2011 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU COMMON ORDER CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos. 5223 of 2008, 5227 of 2008 and 5481 of 2008 1.2.2011 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos. 5223 of 2008, 5227 of 2008 and 5481 of 2008 1.2.2011 CRP Nos. 5223 of 2008, 5227 of 2008 and 5481 of 2008 Between: Shanta Devi …Petitioner And N.Rama Rao & another …Respondents