- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.366 OF 2001 Chandrakant s/o Laxmikant Mulavekar, Age 40 years, Occ. Legal practitioner, R/o 16, Jaihind Colony, Aurangabad. ... PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra, (Copy to be served on P.P., High Court, Aurangabad. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Aurangabad. 3. The Police Inspector, Kranti Chowk Police Station, Aurangabad. 4. Dada Fakri Shejwal, Age 37 years, Occ. Government service, R/o Padegaon, Taluka and District Aurangabad. 5. B.S. Bankar, Age 43 years, Occ. Service, A.S.I., Kranti Chowk Police Station, Aurangabad. 6. A.K. Pawar, Age 32, years, Occ. Head Constable, (B.No.1520) Kranti Chowk Police Station, Aurangabad. ----- Shri D.M. Hange, Advocate holding for Shri R.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner Shri S.D. Kaldate, A.P.P. for respondents ----- - 2 - CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, JJ. DATED : 29th January, 2010. ORAL JUDGMENT (PER HARDAS, J.) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by which the petitioner prays for issuance of a writ directing respondent No.2 to hand over the investigation of the complaint dated 30.7.2001 filed by the petitioner to an officer not below the rank of D.C.P. The petitioner also prays for quashing and setting aside the complaint dated 2.8.2001 filed by the fourth respondent insofar as it relates to the petitioner. 2. It appears that, rule came to be issued on 21.8.2001. It also appears that no interim relief came to be granted to the petitioner. As a consequence, charge sheet has been filed against the petitioner, as is stated before us by the learned counsel for the parties. In that light of the matter, therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the reliefs which the petitioner has prayed for in this petition have been rendered infructuous. In that light of the matter, therefore, petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Rule discharged. [ SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.] [ P.V. HARDAS, J.]