1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.12.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.BASHA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petition (MD)No.14539 of 2011 V.Thangamani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Head Quarters, Chennai. 2.The Deputy Superintendent, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Nagercoil. ... Respondents Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to initiate appropriate action on the complaint of the petitioner, dated 07.09.2011. For Petitioner : Mr.C.T.Perumal For Respondents : Mr.V.Pandi,Government Advocate. ORDER [Order of the Court was made K.N.BASHA, J] The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition seeking for a direction to the respondents to initiate appropriate action on the complaint of the petitioner, dated 07.09.2011. 2.Mr.V.Pandi, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of all the respondents. By mutual consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing, at the time of admission itself. 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has already made a representation to the respondents on 07.09.2011, making certain allegations against some of the officials of Public Works Department. The grievance of the petitioner is that so far no action is taken on such representation and hence he has been constrained to approach this Court with the present petition, with the aforesaid relief. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.Heard the learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents, on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5.Considering the limited relief sought for by the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the representation of the petitioner, dated 07.09.2011, and without expressing any view on such representation, is constrained to direct the 1st respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 07.09.2011, by affording an opportunity to the petitioner as well as to other relevant parties, by issuing notices, and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a fresh copy of his representation, dated 07.09.2011, to the 1st respondent, within 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AS) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.The Director, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Head Quarters, Chennai. 2.The Deputy Superintendent, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Nagercoil. +1cc to Mr.C.T.Perumal, Advocate, Sr.No.45151 +1cc to the Special Govt.Pleader, Sr.No. 45378 gb ssk/06.01.2012 /5c -2p/- Order in W.P.(MD)No.14539 of 2011 Dated:21.12.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/