IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6447 of 2009 AJAY YADAV SON OF SADANAND YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DUMAR PUL,P.S.KORHA,DISTT.KATIHAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.46240 of 2008 BINHA YADAV @ BINOD YADAV SON OF JANARDAN YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAWABI KEWALA SEEZ,P.S.MANIHARI,DISTT.KATIHAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 1.5.2009 Since both the above applications arise out of one and the same police case, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners seek bail in a case which has been registered for offences under Sections 384 and 386/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to demand of extortion by the accused persons. Co-accused Fulo Yadav has been granted bail whereas co-accused Ram Avatar Mahto has been refused bail. The prayer for bail of Ram Avatar Mahto has been rejected considering the fact that he is accused in many cases. About petitioners, it is stated that they are not accused in any case relating to extortion. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners of both the applications be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in Manihari P.S.Case No. 50 of 2008. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)