IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32038 of 2011 Dhrup Singh @ Drup Kr. Singh, son of Ramashankar Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 28.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner is in custody since 25.8.2011 and now charges have been framed and the petitioner undertakes that he will be physically present on each date, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of F.T.C.-V, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 73 of 2007 arising out of Amnour (Bheldi) P.S. Case No. 119 of 2005, subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for 2 cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be physically present on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without any reasonable cause, his bail shall be automatically cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)