s—" ^"^. w:^m -a^ HIGH COURT OF CHHArriSGARH: BILASPUR SINGLEBENGH: HON'BLESHRIJAGDISHBHALLA,Ag.CJ W.P. (C) No. 7481 of2(»7 PETITIONER PLAINTIFF RESPONDENTS DEFENDANTS 1. 1: Mohan Lal son ofJodhRaiSoni, aged ^ .. about 75 years, resident ofSaja, Tahsil Saja, District Durg (C.G.)., , VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - District Collector, Durg(C.G.) • , ! , , Smt. Kannla Baiwic|owpfFekuSoni,aged aboutSOyears.ResidentpfShantiNagaF, BhiIaJ-3,DistrictDuig(C.G.:), Writ.Petition_under Article 227 ofthe Constifution of India Present: Shri Vimlesh Bajpai, Gounsel forthe petitioner, ORALORDER ^Passedonl7nDecember,a07) Petitioher moved:an applicatioh under Qrcler 18 Ryle,1 of Gode of Ciyil Prpoeciure with;J a prayer that^the defendants be elirected to lead his evidence first, thereaflsrtheyshaltcooskjerit. Learned oourisel for the petitioner submjts that the order has been wrongly passed i3y the Cpurt.below and hjs application shoylct haveteen allowed beoause the defencfants No. 1 and 3 died during the proceedings. Thereafter their names have already been deteted. Noother point has been pressed. - ' . • This Court is ofthe opinion that the plaintiff has no right to file such an application because this can only be possible for defendants to move such application. Aocordingly, no interferenoe is warrantedand the writ petition is dismissed. Acting Chief Justice -I :^/ <;-,.