- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Notice of Motion No.1329 of 2004 In Appeal No.445 of 2004 In Notice of Motion No.359 of 2001 In Suit No.1144 of 2000 Union of India. .. Appellant Vs. Suresh Jayantilal Thanawala & Ors. .. Respondents -- Shri S.R.Rajguru with Ms Nisha Valani for the appellant. Shri Brijesh Upadhyay i/b Purnanand & Co. for the respondent Nos.1 and 2. -- CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & D.G.KARNIK, JJ DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocates for the appellant and the respondent Nos.1 and 2. None present for the remaining respondents, though served. 2. Considering the facts disclosed in the affidavit in support of the notice of motion, sufficient cause being shown for condonation of delay - 2 - of 87 days in filing the present appeal, the same is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). The notice of motion stands disposed of, with no order as to costs. (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J) ( D.G.KARNIK, J)