HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPVR W.P^JfSl No. 6060 of 2007 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^- Badri Prasad Mishra, s/oShri Kaushal Prasbad Mishra, aged about 57 years, occupation Vaapal (Forester), posted at Parichettra Sahayka Chliati, Forest Division, Maadendra Garh, r/o ViUage Janakpur, Distt. Korea (C.G) Versus 1 The State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretaiy department of Forest,D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G). 2 Under Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G) 3 N.P. Yadav, s/o not known to the petitioner, aged about 45 Years, Vanpal (Forester) posted at Kastagar, Janakpur, Forest, Division Maaendragarh, Distt. Korea (C.G). WRJT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearaace: Shri Vinay Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sumit Verma, Pauel Lawyer, for fhe State/respondents no. 1 & 2 on advaace copy. OR&L ORDER (10.10.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on adinission. Leamed counsel for the petitioner subinits fhat the petitioner is presently workiag as Raage Assistaat Circle Chhati in forest Raage of Kuwarpur, Distt. Koria whereas respondent no,3 has been transferred to his place and no order of transfer has been issued for fhe petitioner. The order passed in favour of respondeiit no.3 is Aaiiexure P-2. __————^ BMBSifiiSi W.PJS) Np.6060 of2007 /Rao/ Y' Needless to say that in fact no order or direction is required ia fhis case because ia column no.2 offhe impugned order itself, it has been m.entioned that fhe officers who were already posted there at a pardcular place sbatl be on llie option of the Divisional Forest Officer of their concemed division. Therefore, by necessaxy icuplication, the petitioner is on the option of the Divisioaal Forest OfBcer of Forest Division Manendragarh, Distt. Koria and he will pass appropriate orders ia case ofthe petitioner. No direction or order is required ia this case. The petition is dfaposed ofat the xnotion stage itself. ; Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge