1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3444 OF 2008 Sundar s/o Madanrao Chavan - PETITIONER VERSUS 1) The Govt. of India and others. - RESPONDENTS ***** Mr.MA Tandale, Advocate for Petitioner; Mr.Alok Sharma, Standing Counsel for Union of India; Mrs.AV Gondhalekar,AGP for Resp.Nos. 2 and 3; ----- CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE : 17th November, 2009. PER COURT : . Heard. 2) The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the sugarcane grown by the petitioner in one acre land during 2006-2007 season was not harvested by the sugar factory . 3) We are not inclined to exercise extra ordinary writ jurisdiction in the matter since 2 the petitioner has alternate efficacious remedy, which the petitioner can resort to. 4) With these observations, the petition stands disposed of. All issues are kept open. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) (NARESH H. PATIL) JUDGE JUDGE bdv/wp344.08