IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.7 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 04.01.2011 Om Parkash . . .Petitioner Versus Hem Raj and another . . . Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This revision petition is against the order dated 11.12.2010 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Bathinda by which an application filed by respondent No.2 for dismissal of the eviction petition on the ground that the landlord had not obtained his consent before filing of the eviction petition though he is also a co-owner of the demised premises. Admittedly, the eviction petition was filed in the year 2002 and the aforesaid application, which has been decided vide impugned order, has been filed in the year 2010. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the revision petition with liberty to raise this plea at the time of final hearing as the learned Rent Controller, while passing the impugned order, had observed that the application has been filed at a belated stage as the parties have already led their respective evidence. In view of the above, the present revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn as prayed for with liberty to the petitioner to raise this plea at the time of final hearing, which has been taken in the application and is decided by the impugned order. January 04, 2011. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vivek JUDGE