THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32719 of 2010 Dated 31.03.2011 Between: K.Narsimhan …Petitioner And The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by the Principal Secretary, Hyderabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: None appeared Counsel for respondents:-- The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “….to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate order or orders against the respondent declaring the action of Official respondents is constituting the Agricultural Market committee at Bowenpally pursuant to G.O.Rt.No.1620 dated 16-11-2010 as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14, 19 (1) (g) and 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the Agriculture Committee comprising of unofficial respondent which is constituted pursuant to the G.O.Rt.No.1620 dated 16-11-2010 and pass such other order or orders…” On 31.12.2010, 14.02.2011, 01.03.2011 and 23.03.2011, the case was adjourned at the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Even today, when the case is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. It is, therefore, reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing his cause in the writ petition. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.41582 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 31st March, 2011 GHN