1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Family Court Appeal No.65 of 2008 With Civil Application No.293 of 2007 Kailash Teju Gupta Appellant Vs. Rita Kailash Gupta Respondent Mr.R.R.Sharma for appellant. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. September 11, 2008 P.C. . Heard Mr.Sharma, the learned counsel for the appellant - husband. This appeal impugns the judgment and order dated 1/6/2006 rendered by the Family Court at Mumbai in Petition No.E-371 of 2002. The said petition was filed by the respondent - wife under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance for herself and her minor children born from the appellant. The Family Court was pleased to fix the maintenance amount at Rs.1000/- per month for the wife and Rs.500/- for each of the four minor children thus making a total amount of Rs.3000/- per month. . As per Section 19(2) of the Family Courts Act an appeal against the order passed by the Family Court under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not maintainable. 2 . Hence this appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. . Civil Application does not survive and the same stands disposed. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)