IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 7TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 16TH KARTHIKA 1930 RP.No. 517 of 2008() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WA.945/2008 Dated 22/04/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: -------------------------------------------------------------- DR.VARGHESE MUNDACKAL, SUMMER CASTLE APPT.11B, SWARGAM ROAD, ALWAYE. BY ADV. ADV.DR.VARGHESE MUNDACKAL(PARTY INPERSON RESPONDENT(S): WRIT APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------- 1. ALLIANCE PRIME ROSE REALTORS, REP. BY MANAGING PARTNER, 102 PIONEER TOWERS, MARINE DRIVE, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN. 2. CHENGAMANADU GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP. BY SECRETARY, CHENGAMANADU, NEDUMBASSERY P.O. ALWAYE. 3. GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP. BY SECRETARY, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN. 4. MINISTRY OF LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, REP. BY SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 5. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT,TRIVANDRUM. 6. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KAKKANADU, ERNAKULAM. 7. KERALA COSTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY REP. BY MEMBER SECRETARY, SASTHRI BHAVAN, PATTOM, TRIVANDRUM-4. ADV. SRI.K.RAVINDRAN FOR R1 SRI.M.S.ANILKUMAR FOR R1 G.P. SMT.SMITHA SUKUMARAN FOR R4 TO R6 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & ANTONY DOMINIC, JJ. .................................................................... R.P. No.517 of 2008 in W.A. No.945 of 2008 .................................................................... Dated this the 7th day of October, 2008. ORDER Ramachandran Nair, J. Review is filed by the first respondent in the Writ Appeal contending that contrary to assumption made by this court, the Panchayat had in fact earlier issued prohibitory order on 22.2.2008 stopping construction. Since the judgment in the Writ Appeal was pronounced without knowing prohibitory order if any issued by the Panchayat, we clarify that the judgment in the Writ Appeal to the effect that the learned Single Judge is free to decide all issues raised in the W.P.(C) untrammeled by the observations in the judgment in the Writ Appeal. The review petitioner can move for early hearing of the W.P.(C). C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge ANTONY DOMINIC Judge pms