SBCWP NO.4459/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4459/2010. Rajendra Kumar Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order:- April 2, 2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Babu Lal Sharma for the petitioner. ***** BY THE COURT:- this writ petition is directed against the order dated 5/3/2010 by which, services of petitioner whose appointment was made on contract basis under the NAREGA Scheme was discontinued w.e.f. 5/3/2010. 2) Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the impugned-order is based on mere assertion that petitioner has forged the muster roll and other documents. Appointment of the petitioner was made way back on 29/3/2009 as Gram Rojgar Sahayak. Learned counsel also cited the term of agreement executed between the petitioner and the respondents and submitted that as per the said agreement, respondents were required to serve upon the petitioner 15 days prior notice in case they wanted to terminate his services. SBCWP NO.4459/10. 2 3) Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record, I find that order impugned clearly states that petitioner was found indulged in some irregularities which was unbecoming of his post. Therefore services of petitioner who was engaged as Gram Rojgar Sahayak are no longer required and contract of his services was discontinued from 5/3/2010. So far as the question of not serving upon the petitioner 15 days prior notice is concerned, it is left open upon the petitioner to make representation to the respondents for considering his case for granting him remuneration of 15 days as envisaged in the agreement. 4) Writ petition is dismissed although with the aforesaid observations. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil