^ s•'"•ULE Ba-i'f.pj : y d^l •^-S) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W. P. (Sl No. S / 2007 PETITIONER ^y ^:^. ..--s^ ^. ly ^^^"..••- ^fiW^ •"''-;^<'>''' ^^' ^--Parsadi Ram Bhuarya, S/o. Shri Milap Singh Bhuarya, aged about 43 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School- Kusumkasa, Block - Dondi Distt.-Durg (C.G.) VERSUS ^ RESPONDENTS ^0^i )^1^ .^ it^G.^^*" ^f..- . c^ 1.- State of Chhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary Department of Education/Tribal Welfare D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Commissioner Tribal Welfare, / Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur ^. District Education Officer, Dis^t. - Durg (C.G.) WTV. 4. Assistant Commissioner, r ls4i^. - ' '^"'^SA fffSIJI %:'^''-^^.^^^/^ ~t^===^ WRIT REILTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION Tribal Welfare Department Distt. - Durg (C.G.) OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT. WRITS, DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. ^>\ HI6H COURT OF CHHATTtSGAW AT BILASPUK W. P. f5)No. 588 of 2007 Petitioner : Parsadi Ram Bhuarya Versus Respondents ; State of Chhatt-isgarh and others SB: Hon'bfe Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Mr. A. S. Rnjput, Adwcate for the petitioner. Miss Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State, Oft OER O'assed on 29rt day of Jcnucry, 2007} The following order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agmhstri. J. 1. Leamed counsel <ypearing for th®petitioner as wefl as learned Panel Lawyer oppedring for tfie re^ondents/State jointty submit that the facts of the present case is similar to that of in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2(X)6 (5ushil Tiwari <S others Vs. State 6ovt. of Chhatt'isgarh A oihers), w^iich was attowed wde order dated 71^ Noyember, 2006. Tfcey further submit that the question of taw inwlved is also •ttie ^. amie. 2. In view of the above stated submissions made by leamed counsel for the part-ies, the writ petition is atlowed in -terms of the order dateet 7th Novsmber, 2006 passed by this Court in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006. No order as to costs. Thokur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge