IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.8985 of 2009 Between: Akula Veeraiah … Petitioner And The Joint Collector, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District, & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Ch. Janardhan Reddy This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8985 of 2009 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings No.CS.6/1179/2007, dated 31.01.2008 of the 1st respondent in setting aside the orders of the 2nd respondent made in proceedings dated 16.11.2007 and allowing the 3rd respondent to continue the 3rd respondent as fair price shop dealer of Adlooriyellareddy Village of Sadasiva Nagar, Nizamabad District, as illegal, arbitrary, against the rules framed under G.O.Ms.No.53, dated 06.10.2003 and violation of principles of natural justice.” At the hearing, Sri Ch. Janardhan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after filing of this writ petition, respondent No.2 cancelled the authorization of respondent No.3 and that in view of the same, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.11746 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 18.06.2009 ES