HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARM AT BILASPUR WritPetition No.81 of2003 Petitioriers Respondents J.- -iWi' SB 1. 2. Versus 1. 2. 3. Ram Nath Soni, S/o Late Ganga Sao Soni, Aged about 63 years, Resiaent of Baniatoii, Tahsil & Dist. Jashpur (Ghhattisgarh) Sagar Ram Nagdev S/o Late Nete Ram Nagdev, Aged about 63 years, R/o Village - l-1arradipa, Tahsil A/lanora, DistrictJashpur, Chhattisgarh State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) District Treasury Officer Jashpur Chhattisgarh. Joint Director CTreasury Accounts & Pension) Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, Chhatb'sgarh. WRITPETITON UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION Hon'ble Justice Shri SatishK. Aanihotri Present: Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. V.V.S. Murthy, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Sushil Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the respondents '?» > OR D E R (Passed on this 7th day of May, 2007) 1. Mr.Ashish Shrivastava, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as Mr. V.V.S. Murthy, learnedDeputy Advocate General with Mr. Sushil Dubey, learned Govt. Advocate jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved inthe present writ petition are the same to that of in W.P. No. 4432/1996 (Vidya Shankar Tiwari Vs. State of M.P. (Now State of Chhattisgarh) and others) 2006 (2) M.P.H.T. 31 (CG), which has been allowed vide order dated 23.12.2005. 2. !n view of the above stated submission made by learned counsel ^ • 1 appearing for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same > iin gwglSjI terms. The impugned brdersdated 30.4.2002 (Annexure P/2); 1.5.2002 (Annexure P/3) and 26.7.2002 (Annexure P/4) are quashed and the respondents are directed to refund the amount, if any, recovered pursuant to the orders dated 30.4.2002, 1.5.2002 and 26.7.2002 from the petitioners. This order shallnotcome in the way of the respondents/authorities to takeany action, ifso advised, against the ofRcecswho are responsible for making payments, if any, to the ^ • • ' petitioners concerned. No order as to costs. p- Sd/'- Satish K. Agrahotri Judge