THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No. 168 OF 2010. DATED 11TH AUGUST, 2010. BETWEEN V.Ananthamma ….Petitioner and The Municipal Corporation of Kadapa, and ors …Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No. 168 of 2010 ORDER: This Writ Petition is ﬁled seeking a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents 1 and 3 in not taking steps to prevent the second respondent from making illegal constructions on the vacant site of the petitioner bearing Municipal D.No. 17/455 as illegal and violative of Sections 428, 429, 433 and 440 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act ( for short ‘HMC Act’). The grievance of the petitioner is that eventhough she made a complaint dated 04.01.2010 to the respondent authorities to prevent the second respondent from making illegal constructions in her land in question, no action has been taken so far. This Court by order dated 19.01.2010 while ordering notice before admission, directed the ﬁrst respondent to consider the representation/complaint of the petitioner dated 4.01.2010 and take steps in accordance with law. Later on, the ﬁrst respondent ﬁled counter stating that the second respondent has commenced the construction over the existing ground ﬂoor building roof slab D.No. 17/456 by raising the existing walls and on coming to know the same, immediately notice dt. 9.1.2010 under Sections 461 of HMC Act 1955 was issued directing the second respondent to stop the construction as the same is carried on without obtaining necessary permission as required under Section 428 of HMC Act 1955. However, it is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that there is title dispute in respect of the land in question between the petitioner and the second respondent. This Court cannot go into the title dispute between the parties. It is for the competent Civil Court to decide the same. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent submitted that pursuant to the order of this Court, action has been initiated based on the complaint made by the petitioner. In the circumstances, the ﬁrst respondent is directed to complete the action initiated based on the complaint of the petitioner in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ----------------------------------- JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Dated 11th August, 2010. Msnr.