Slngle Bench -^ ^ ^ - J- 2^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.fSlNO. &^^^/2008S.B. PETITIONER 7-" ^> ^'v..^^>- '(yc'y"^ .•^. .^' ^'.^ ^^ ^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ G.S. Tomar, aged about 61 years, S/o Shri Bhanwar Singh Tomar, Voluntary Retired from the post of Assistant Engineer, O/o. Executive Engineer, P.H.E., Durg, District Durg (C.G.) R/o. B- 325, Shalimar Bunglaw Park, Sukhaliya, Indore (M.P.) 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Government of Chhattisgarh, Public Health & Engineering Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Accountant General, Government of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. The Engineer-in- Chief, Public Health & Engineering Department, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Chief Engineer, Public Health & Engineering Department, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5. The District Treasury Officer, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 6. Executive Engineer, Public Health & Engineering Department, Project Division No. 2, Dand Complex, Civil y. ^ Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF. MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT/WRITS OF ORDER/ORDERS OR DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS OF THE LIKE ^^^^~"~ \v HmH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB ; HOrBLE SHRI JXJ8TICE PRITINKER DIWAKER W.P.(Sl N0. 6586/3008 ! - . ! : ' '. .. PETITIONBR j G.S.Tomar Versus RE8PONDENTS State of C.G. & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearaace: Shn N.K.Chatterjee, counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, G.A. wiffa Smt. Smita Ghai, P.L. for the State. ORALOJSQER. (21.07.2009) With tlie consent of leamed counsel for fhe parties, flie inatter is heard finaUy. The presenf case pertam.s to the non-payiaent of retdaldues, ShriYashwant Sio.gh Thakur, Dy. A.G. submits that fhe State Govem32ieut has already constituted a High Power Retiral Dues Conimittee aiid the said Conim.ittee is duly eiapowered to consider the cases like ttiat of the petitioner. Let the petitioner file a representatioii to th.e said Committee or to make a request to the office of fhe Advocate General along wifti copy of the writ petition for forwardiag fhe same to fhe Coniimttee. Let ffads be done within a period of 15 days froin fhe date ofreceipt offhis order. On fhis beiag done, fh.e Coniniittee shall issue notice to fh.e petitipner aiid officers concem.ed with±D. a further 1 v period of 15 days. The CoBim.ittee shaJl consider and pass order in. accordaace wifh law after affording due opportanity of heariiig to fh.e petitioner, The petitioner aad the officers concerD.ed inay file additioual documents, tf necessar)r. The eutire exercise uichidtng paynient of retrial dues^ if any, to the petitioner, be conxpleted wifhia a perk)d of four nionth.s froni fhe date of receipt of copy of fhis order. Wifh the above obseryations, this petition is disposed of. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge