IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7169 of 2008 THE DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY THROUGH THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER ROHTAS, SASARAM,NAMELY-------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LABOUR,GOVT. OF INDIA,SHRAM SHAKTI BHAWAN, RAFI MARG, NEW DELHI ORS. 2. THE CHIEF LABOUR COMMISSIONER, MINISTRY OF LABOUR, NEW DELHI 3. THE CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI 4. THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, R-BLOCK ROAD NO.6, PATNA 5. THE RECOVERY OFFICER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION,R-BLOCK,ROAD-6,PATNA--RESPONDENTS ----------- 4 17.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the Employees Provident Fund Authority. On the categorical statement having been made by the petitioner that he was not given opportunity of hearing before dismissal of his review application, this matter is being remanded to Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, respondent no.4, after setting aside the order contained in annexure-2 dated 19th March, 2008 with a direction that the petitioner will appear before the Provident Fund Authority within two weeks from today and the Provident Fund Authority will either hear him on that day or any other date mutually agreeable to both the parties and thereafter pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. This writ application is disposed of with the above direction. No separate order is required with regard to Interlocutory Application No. 2769 of 2008. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)