IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2405 of 2011 ============================================= Maheshwar Raut .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ============================================= Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar Tiwary For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.K. Verma Aag5 ============================================= 3 23-11-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite parties. The fresh order dated 4.11.2011 displays adequate compliance of the order of the Court when it refers to the promotion of the petitioner on the post of Live Stock Supervisor as being contrary to law declining fixation of pay scale for the discussions contained in the order that he is not entitled for the same. The grievance of the petitioner with regard to the fresh order on its merits cannot be examined in the contempt jurisdiction and has to be the subject matter of adjudication in a fresh writ application only. In absence of any directions to consider grant of A.C.P. it cannot be considered in the present proceeding. If the petitioner has represented or represents, naturally, the respondents are expected to consider the same in accordance with law without 2 unnecessarily generating litigation. The contempt proceedings stand disposed. Krishna Chandra Jha/- (Navin Sinha, J)