IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32699 of 2010 RAKESH PASI @ RAJESH PASI, S/o Ramdeo Pasi. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 30.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code. By order dated 27.07.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 15484 of 2010 the petitioner was refused bail on the ground that the petitioner was arrested along with two others on chase when it was learnt that accused persons had gathered at NH-31 this fact was disputed by the petitioner therefore the case diary was called for. This is incorrect that it was not the petitioner but one Rakesh Ram who had been arrested on chase. However, on going through the case diary it appears that Rakesh Ram has disclosed the name of the petitioner as having actively taken part in the kidnapping for ransom. In view of such, I am not inclined to review my earlier order. The prayer for bail is once again rejected. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)