SCA/9238/1997 1/3 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 9238 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= IDGAH GRAHAK SAHKARI BHANDAR LIMITED - Petitioner(s) Versus DISTRICT REGISTRAR - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR SHIRISH JOSHI for Petitioner(s) : 1, GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent(s) : 1, ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI Date : 01/11/2006 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. In this petition, the petitioner society has challenged order passed by the authorities liquidating the society under Section 107 of the SCA/9238/1997 2/3 JUDGMENT Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act as upheld by an order passed by the Additional Registrar (Appeals). 2. After some discussion at bar, learned advocate Shri Joshi for the petitioner submitted that he is unable to supply the current status of the condition of petitioner-society since despite his best efforts, he has not received instructions from the petitioner. In absence of any material regarding the present condition of functioning of the petitioner-society, it is not possible for this Court to examine the issues further. Since learned advocate for the petitioner is unable to supply such details, for want of instructions, this petition is disposed of for want of prosecution. If the petitioner approaches this Court within reasonable time making out grounds for not supplying instructions to its learned advocate, surely, the Court would examine such a request at the appropriate time. SCA/9238/1997 3/3 JUDGMENT 3. The petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged. Interim relief is vacated. No order as to costs. (Akil Kureshi, J.) (raghu)