vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.845 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.845 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.845 OF 2008 Shri Arvind Ramlal Kothari ... Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.V.B. Tapkir for Petitioner Mrs.A.A. Mane, APP, for Respondent-State CORAM: SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. DATED: JUNE 25, 2008 JUNE 25, 2008 JUNE 25, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The petitioners have filed the present petition against the order passed by the Sessions Court which has confirmed the order passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate on an application filed by the petitioners for return of the property. According to the petitioners, the ornaments which the police have seized from the accused belong to them. Receipts have been produced by them indicating that those ornaments belong to them and, therefore, all the ornaments seized from the accused should be returned. In my opinion, both the Metropolitan Magistrate and the Sessions Court have considered the application in the proper perspective. Ornaments which have initials "M.J." etched on them have been returned to the complainant. However, there are ornaments with different initials and marks on them which are retained. The learned advocate for the : 2 : petitioners has produced before me the receipts which were placed on record before Sessions Court indicating the sale of ornaments to Mahavir Jewellers i.e. the firm run by the petitioners. However, these receipts do not in any manner indicate which is the exact piece of jewellery which has been purchased by the Mavavir Jewellers from other dealers of silver ornaments. 2. In these circumstances, the Petition is rejected.