r" m^^ SEfeL 1- INTHE HON'BLE HIGHCOURTOFJUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.No.24~7 8/20Q6 PETITIONER : / Dr. Subrat Nandi, Aged - 44 years, S/o A. N. Nandi, Medical Officer, Community Health Genten VTrisg?—ATjunda,Tehsil - Gundardehi, D]st.-Durg(C.G.) VERSUS / 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) / 2. ChiefMedical & Health Officer District Hospital, Durg (C.G.) / WRIT PETITIONUNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OFTHE CQNSTITUTIQNOF INDIA RESPONDENTS ^^> ..^.AV--'' .-••' /<[&'•••' ...•-"' ^w""'" ..'•'' •" ^\<»' ^•^ c^~ ^" t XI-HC-22 ^^ '<iiqi!v]<i, »fllyi6,is«ni<iy sn^i^ii •f?;IR;3IT^[ ^E?! "^T?tT -!. [^ ^ N' 7^/ sn^r'RBIW :gf??i 10-5-2006 •^pfeii^TWTCif ^ •feizt TfSn^re ^siPgHaii^T Mr. Somkant Verma,coun^el for the petitioner. Miss Deepali Pandey, Pan| Heard both the counsel. By the instant writ petitiorj otderdated 14thNovember, 200^ made by learned coynsel for t^ working since tast 11 years at il Lawyer, for the State/respondents. , the petitioner has questioned the transfer (Annexure P-1), wherebythe petitioner has been transferred from Comrnunity Health Centre, Afjunda, District: Durg, to Community Health Centre, Bilaig^rh, District: Raipur. The petitioner is working ^is Medical Officer and as per the statement ie petitioner at the Bar, the petitioner was ^rjunda and nothing has been brought on record which shows that the petifioner has beei^ transferred on the ground of mata Me br that his transfer is ojintrary to the statutory rules. Therefore, 1 do not find any reason to interfere| jurisdiction under Article 226/227] In the circumstances, the| wth the impugned order by exercising the ofthe Constitution of India. petition is liable to be dismissed and it is accordingly, dismissed, at the ac(mission stage itself. Conseqyentty, M.(W.)P.N{?.1866/2(X)6 stands disposed of. SA'- ^^ado° "~iu&6e ['TTt^ ^Ra^