W.P.(C) No.3580/2010 Page 1 of 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 3580/2010 Reserved on : 4th August, 2010 Pronounced on: 9th August, 2010 MR. VIVEK SINGH ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Alka, Advocate. VERSUS CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Pranav Kishore Jha, Advocate for Mr. Lajwinder Singh, Advocate for the respondent No.2. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA 1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? % JUDGMENT VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J In view of the judgment passed in WP(C) No. 8221/2009, this writ petition is allowed and it is held that concerned DRT at Delhi would have territorial jurisdiction and the finding that only the DRT W.P.(C) No.3580/2010 Page 2 of 2 Chandigarh would have jurisdiction is therefore set aside. The general order dated 17.10.2008 passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal that only such DRT would have jurisdiction where the original application is filed by the bank and not where the mortgaged property is situated is accordingly quashed and set aside. Copy of the judgment in W.P.(C) No. 8221/2009 be placed in the file of this case. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J. AUGUST 09, 2010 SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. ib/Ne