IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21570 of 2009 KALLU PASWAN @ VIJENDRA PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 10.08.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Section 307 and other allied Sections of the Penal Code. As per allegation in the F.I.R., petitioner along with other accused persons entered into the house and assaulted the informant with a weapon used for cutting palm stem (a sharp edged weapon) which hit the neck of the informant. It is alleged that thereafter he again assaulted the informant with the said weapon causing injury in his right hand. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is counter case also lodged by the father of the present petitioner from perusal whereof, it would appear that the present prosecution side were the aggressors as they attacked the house of the petitioner and assaulted many of them including the petitioner. The occurrence had taken place in the year 2004. It appears the petitioner surrendered and is in custody since 30.04.2009. Impugned order reflects that the injury report supports the prosecution case. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is not inclined to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected. 2 However, the petitioner is granted liberty to renew prayer for bail after 08 months if all the prosecution witnesses are not examined. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)