Crl. R No. 2106 OF 2010 (O&M) ****** Sardool Singh vs State of Punjab & others Present : None for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Chandumajra, DAG Punjab for respondent No.1. None for respondents No.2 to 4. ******* Even on second call, no one has entered appearance for the petitioner. On the previous three occasions also, no one had appeared for the petitioner. There is also delay of 100 days in filing this revision petition. The challenge in this petition is to the release of respondents No.2 to 4 on probation in offences under Sections 323, 325, 452, 506/34 of the IPC. I have gone through the judgments of the Courts below. Cogent reasons have been given for releasing respondents No.2 to 4 on probation. Consequently, this petition is dismissed. ( AJAY TEWARI ) March 14, 2011. JUDGE `kk'