IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY TWENTYFIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No. 1 3 7 6 OF 2002. Between: Rural Christian Junior College, Deenapur, Pirangopuram, Guntur district, represented by its Correspondent, Mr.P. Ranjan Babu …. Appellant V/s. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Education Department (HE) Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad & Anr. …. Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: Smt. M. Shalini Counsel for the Respondent: Govt. Pleader for Higher Education THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No. 1 3 7 6 OF 2002. J U D G M E N T : (Per the Hon'ble Smt. Justice T. Meenakumari) The writ appeal is filed against the order dated 21-3-2002 passed in WP.No. 5114 of 2002 by the learned single Judge, whereby the learned single Judge dismissed the writ petition. 2. The main writ petition is filed to declare the action of the respondents in not admitting the petitioner institution to grant-in-aid with retrospective effect as was done in the case of other institutions as illegal, arbitrary and offends Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, to direct the respondents to admit the petitioner institution to grant-in-aid with retrospective effect and to grant all consequential benefits and to grant such other and further reliefs as this court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. 3. When the matter has come up for hearing, Smt.Shalini, the learned counsel submits that her name is wrongly printed and she is not appearing in the matter. As the counsel for the appellant on record had passed away and the record shows that no other counsel has entered appearance. Further Smt.Shalini, the learned counsel submits that already she intimated the appellant with regard to the demise of Sri V. Jogayya Sarma, the leaned counsel for the appellant on record but the appellant did not take any steps to appoint any other counsel in the place of late Sri V.Jogayya Sarma. 4. For the reasons mentioned hereinabove, the writ appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. __________________________ JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI _______________________ JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR 21-10-2009. I s L