IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16637 of 2000 RANGAN RAI & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR For the petitioners: Shri Jai Puriyar,Adv. For the State: Shri Jharkhanadi Upadhyay,A.P.P. ----------- 4. 2.7.2010 After having heard Shri Jai Puriyar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Jharkhandi Upadhyay, learned A.P.P. for the State and also having perused the statement made in the complaint petition, it could not be said that no offence appeared committed by the accused on facts alleged. It was submitted that the complaint petition was frivolous as the police had made a report in an inquiry for initiating a proceeding under Section 107 of the Cr. P.C. The difficulty with the Court is that it could not go into the whole matter to consider any extraneous ground and to hold without legal acceptable material before it that the complaint petition was frivolous. However, it is a case which is more than 11- year- old and the Court has stayed the proceeding. The trial has to begin now because the Court does not find any merit in the petition and, as such, the Court wants to impress upon the trial court to impress upon the parties to bury their hatchet and compromise and live as peaceful neighbours. With the above observation, the petition is dismissed. 2 The stay granted earlier is vacated. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)