IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 677 of 2004 (M/B) 1. Niraj Stone Crusher through its partner Satya Narayan Ranipur Jhan, Jwalapur, Tehsil and District Haridwar 2. Sangeeta Gramodyog Sansthan through its Member Bijendra Kumar, Ibrahimpur Minor, Jwalapur, Tehsil and District Haridwar 3. Subham Gramodyog Sansthan through Its Secretary Ibrahimpur Minor, Jwalapur, Tehsil and District Haridwar 4. Sri Ram Stone Crusher Unit-I through its patner Amesh Sharma, Ibrahimpur Minor, Jwalapur, Tehsil and District Haridwar 5. Rishavh Stone Crusher through its partner Vivek Jain, Ibrahimpur Minor, Jwalapur, Tehsil and District Haridwar 6. Mahavir Stone Crusher through its proprietor Balesh Chandra Jain, Ibrahimpur Minor, Jwalapur, Tehsil and District Haridwar 7. Sri Gangh Stone Crusher through its partner R.P. Agarwal, Ibrahimpur Minor, Jwalapur, Tehsil and District Haridwar 8. Sri Ram Stone Crusher Unit-II through its partner Yogesh Sharma, Roorkee Road, Jwalapur, Tehsil and District Haridwar 9. New Laxmi Stone Crusher through its Partner Ram Teerath Roorkee Road, Jwalapur, Tehsil and District Haridwar 10. Gupta Stone Crusher through its Partner Nitin Gupta Roorkee Road, Jwalapur, Tehsil and District Haridwar 11. Veer Sri Traders through its proprietor Smt. Usha Jain Roorkee Road, Jawalapur, Tehsil and District Haridwar 12. Himalaya Stone Crusher through its proprietor Smt. Sheela Devi, Roorkee Road, Jwalapur, Tehsil and District Haridwar 13. Laxmi Stone Crusher through its partner Harsh Kumar Bye Pass Road, Jwalapur, Tehsil and District Haridwar …………. Petitioners Versus 1. Zila Panchayat, Haridwar through its Adhyaksha 2. District Magistrate, Haridwar 3. Senior Superintendent of Police, District Haridwar 4. Vinod Kumar Sharma s/o Sri Din Dayal Sharma r/o Madhu-Vinod Kharkhari, Tehsil and District Haridwar. ………….. Respondents ………… Petitioners’ counsel absent. Sri Sharad Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.1 Sri Subhash Upadhyay Standing Counsel for respondents 2 and 3. None for respondent no.4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Petitioners’ counsel absent. Sri Sharad Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.1 Sri Subhash Upadhyay Standing Counsel for respondents 2 & 3. None for respondent no.4. 2. Sri Sharma, the learned counsel for respondent no.1-Zila Panchayat, Haridwar Submits that the writ petition filed by petitioners challenging the imposition of loading/unloading charges by Zila Panchayat is not maintainable in view of the judgment dated 07.04.2003 passed in Writ Petition No. 211 of 2003 (M/B), whereby the imposition of loading and unloading fee by Nagar Palika Parishad was upheld. 3. As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 13.07.2006 13.07.2006 A