IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3216 of 2007 Brajesh Kumar Singh, son of Binay Kumar Singh, resident of Village- Dhabauli, P.S. Sour Bazar, District-Saharsa Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Sri Ashish Ranjan, The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna 3. Sri Raj Bardhan Sharma, The Inspector General of Police, Bihar, Patna 4. Sri Shaheb Akhtar, The D.I.G. of Police, Kosi Range, Saharsa 5. Sri Vir Kuwar Singh, The Superintendent of Police, Saharsa ----------- 5. 6.11.2009 The petitioner claims violation of the order dated 23.3.2007 passed by this Court. In the said order it was directed that if the petitioner files representation within four weeks from today then the same shall be decided in accordance with law within a period of three months and an intimation to this effect will be communicated to him. The submission made in the contempt application is that the petitioner filed representations on 12.4.2007, 5.11.2007 and 6.12.2007 and a copy of the representation dated 6.12.2007 has been brought on the record as Annexure-2. In the show cause filed on behalf of the Director General of Police, Bihar, it is stated that no representation or the representation dated 6.12.2007 was ever filed before him or before the I.G. or D.I.G. of police. From a perusal of the representation dated 6.12.2007 it does not appear that it has been received in the office of the Dy. Inspector General of Police, Koshi Range, Saharsa to whom it is addressed. 2 An attempt has been made by the petitioner to bring on record the registry receipts dated 6.3.2007 to show that he had filed the representations. The said registry receipt is prior to the order under contempt of this Court which cannot be considered as a representation pursuant to the order dated 23.3.2007 of this Court. In the above circumstances there is no merit in the contempt application. It is accordingly dismissed. S. Pandey ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)