IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.938 of 2008 RAMDEO JASWARA @ RAMDEO YESHGARA @ RAMDEO RAM Versus RAJ NARAYAN SINGH ----------- 2 4/7/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In view of the fact that the court below in the impugned order has clearly recorded the finding of fact that the scope of Title Suit No. 109 of 2003 and the present Eviction Suit No. 10 of 2005 are absolutely at variance and the parties also are not same and common, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar