Civil Revision No.2783 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2783 of 2009 Date of Decision:21.07.2009 Jitender Sharma son of Ram Babu .....Petitioner versus Jai Parkash Kaushik and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. Present: Mr.B.K.Bagri, Advocate, for the petitioner-plaintiff. None for the respondents. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.(Oral) In this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the grievance of the plaintiff-petitioner is to the order dated 16.12.2008 whereby his evidence has been closed by the trial Court. Learned counsel for the plaintiff-petitioner states that in the interest of justice, one opportunity may be granted to the petitioner to lead the entire evidence at his own risk and responsibility and for this the respondents can be compensated by way of costs. He further submits that the petitioner will conclude his entire evidence on a date to be fixed by the trial Court. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and in the facts and circumstances of the present case, this Court is satisfied that in the interest of justice, the petitioner deserves to be granted one opportunity Civil Revision No.2783 of 2009 2 to conclude his evidence. Accordingly, this revision petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall be granted one opportunity to conclude his entire evidence on the date to be fixed by the trial Court at his own risk and responsibility and subject to payment of Rs.5000/- to the respondents as costs. It is, however, made clear that in case the petitioner fails to conclude his entire evidence or to pay the costs on the date so fixed by the trial Court, as stipulated above, this revision petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed. July 21, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) seema JUDGE