IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA C.W.P. No. 6390 of 2010 Date of decision: 23.12.2010 ------------------------------------------------- Parma Nand Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, J. Whether approved for reporting1? No. For the petitioner: Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General . V.K.Ahuja,J. (Oral: The petitioner who is posted as Male Heath Worker, has been transferred vide order dated 4.10.2010 from Sub Centre Tanbol, District Bilaspur to Sub Centre Jandauri, District Bilaspur against a vacant vacancy. 2. As per reply filed by the respondents, the petitioner had already served in one Block for 19 years and about 10 years of his stay at a particular institution. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a remote area and since only 2 years are left for the retirement of the petitioner, he should be adjusted at a nearby place. The plea has a substance. The petitioner is at a liberty to file a representation before respondent Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? 2 No. 2 alongwith a copy of this writ petition and other documents with a certified copy of this judgment and he shall consider the representation within a period of one month from the date of its presentation, which shall be presented before him within a period of two weeks. Respondent No.2 shall pass an appropriate order in accordance with rules including personal hearing, if prayed for. Till then, the impugned order shall not be implemented, in case, the petitioner has not been relieved from his place of posting. 3. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s) if any. (V.K. Ahuja ), December 23, 2010 Judge (BSS)