:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 88 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.275 OF 2001 Smt. Renuka Devendra Parihar and Anr. ....Applicants. V/s The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent. ---- Mr. Prakash Naik for the applicants. Ms. S.V. Gajre, APP for the State. ---- CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J. DATE: DATE: DATE: 28th March, 2006 28th March, 2006 28th March, 2006 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicants. 2. Applicants have filed affidavit of service in which it is stated that pursuant to the directions given by this Court dated 20/3/2006, all steps were taken to serve the Respondent No.4. In spite of service of notice, none appears for respondent No.4. For reasons stated in the Criminal Application, delay in filing the application is condoned and Criminal Writ Petition is restored alongwith interim orders passed by this Court. 3. Criminal Application is disposed of. Hearing of the Criminal Writ Petition is expedited. :2: 4. Liberty to mention again for a fixed date of hearing in the week commencing from 10th April, 2006. 5. Place Criminal Writ Petition on the final hearing board on 10th April, 2006. V.M. V.M. V.M. KANADE, J. KANADE, J. KANADE, J.