1 wp1247.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1247 OF 2011 [Namdeo Mhatardeo Waman vs. The State of Mah. & Ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Vinayak M. Kagne,Advocate for petitioner. Mr. V.D. Godbharle, A. G.P. for Resp.No.1. Mr. A.R. Nikam, Advocate for Resp.No.2. Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 served. CORAM : P.B. MAJMUDAR & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 3RD MAY, 2011 PER COURT : The tendency of filing the petitions to decide the representations immediately after making the same within short time is required to be deprecated. 2. In the instant case, the petitioner has made representation on 27-01-2011 and has filed this petition asking the 2 wp1247.11 respondents to decide the same immediately. It is not the case of the petitioner that the representation is not decided since long. 3. We do not propose to direct the respondents to decide the said representation within a particular time bound programme. It is for the respondents to decide the same in accordance with law, as deem fit, expeditiously. 4. Subject to what observed above, the petition is disposed of. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] [P.B. MAJMUDAR,J.] sut/May11