Civil Revision No.6480 of 2009(O & M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6480 of 2009(O & M) Date of Decision:17.05.2010 Satab Singh .... petitioner Versus Jasbir Singh & Ors. .....respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.R.S.Mamli,Advocate for the petitioner Mr.R.K.Dhiman, Advocate for respondent No.1. Respondent No.2 ex parte Mr.Amit Rishi, Advocate for respondent No.3 **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL): CM No.12716-CII of 2010 In this application, the prayer is for setting aside the order dated 22.02.2010 whereby the applicant/respondent No.1 was proceeded ex parte. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made. Application is allowed. The order dated 22.02.2010 proceeding ex parte against respondent No.1 is set aside. CM disposed of. Civil Revision No.6480 of 2009(O & M) This is plaintiff's revision petition challenging the impugned orders passed by the courts below whereby his prayer for ad interim Civil Revision No.6480 of 2009(O & M) 2 injunction during the pendency of the suit has been declined. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that even if, prima facie, it is found that there is no agreement to sell in his favour, still, during the pendency of the suit he is entitled to protect his possession as it is the respondents' own case that petitioner is occupying the property in dispute as a tenant. This fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the respondent. It has been informed that the proceedings in the suit are continuing and now the case is fixed for evidence of the petitioner. Thus, keeping in view the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, this revision petition is disposed of with the directions to the trial court to dispose of the suit within one year from today. In the meantime, parties to the suit shall maintain status quo with regard to the possession. Disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 17.05.2010 neenu