HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25249 of 2010 Date 06.10.2010 Between: Smt K.Triveni. ..... PETITIONER AND Gram Panchayat, Kanuru, rep. By its Secretary, Penamaluru Mandal, Krishna District, and others. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri C.H.Lakshmi Chaya Counsel for Respondent No.1 :Sri M.Prabhakar Rao Counsel for Respondent No.2 :Ms. Triveda for Mrs.Aruna Counsel for Respondent No.3 :AGP for Panchayat Raj HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25249 of 2010 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent Nos.1 to 3 in taking steps to prevent respondent No.4 from constructing an apartment complex in property situated opposite to Door No.13-119, R.S.No.214 Tulasinagar, Main Road, Kanuru, Penamaluru Mandal contrary to the approved plan as illegal and arbitrary. I have heard Sri C.H.Lakshmi Chary, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri M.Prabhakar Rao, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1-Gram Panchayat, Ms. Trivedi, learned Counsel representing respondent No.2, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj. In her affidavit, the petitioner has averred that respondent No.4, who has obtained permission from respondent Nos.1 and 2 for construction of a residential building, has commenced an apartment immediately adjacent to the petitioner’s house in blatant violation of the sanctioned plan. The petitioner has caused a legal notice issued on 20.09.2010 to respondents Nos.1 to 3 wherein she has complained about the alleged illegal construction undertaken by respondent No.4. The grievance of the petitioner is that no action is being taken despite the said notice. Having heard the learned Counsel, I am of the opinion that respondent Nos.1 and 2, who are vested with the powers and charged with the obligation of planned development, shall consider the petitioner’s grievance and take appropriate action in accordance with law. If it is found that respondent No.4 has been making constructions contrary to the sanctioned plan, these respondents shall act in accordance with law after giving notice and opportunity of hearing to respondent No.4. They shall complete this exercise within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the main petition, WPMP.No.32256 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:06.10.2010 usd