IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17814 of 2011 Ramesh Sahni s/o Ramakant Sahni, resident of village Madhubani, P.S. Pokharia, District Parsa (Nepal). Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 29.6.2011. Heard Shri Yogesh Chandra Verma, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and Miss Gulnar Begam, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. This is the second attempt for grant of bail in a short span of time. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected on 4.1.2011 vide Cr. Misc.No.41016 of 2010. The petitioner is accused in a case for the offence under Sections 20 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at least two witnesses, during the trial, have not supported the prosecution case which creates serious doubt on the prosecution case. According to Shri Verma, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, this is the changed circumstance for preferring the present petition. The court is of the opinion that 2 since the trial is going on and the petitioner is accused for an offence under Sections 20 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act and his bail was also rejected earlier, petitioner cannot be extended the privilege of bail. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is again refused. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)