IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 206 of 2005 (S/B) Dr. Rakesh Sinha, S/o Girdhar Shyam Sinha, R/o 5/1374-B, Ta Colony, Pant Nagar, District Udham Singh Nagar. …Petitioner Versus 1. Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pant Nagar, District Udham Singh Nagar, Through its Vice Chancellor. 2. Vice Chancellor, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pant Nagar, District Udham Singh Nagar. 3. Board of Management, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pant Nagar, District Udham Singh Nagar. Through its Chairman. 4. Chief Personnel Officer, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pant Nagar, District Udham Singh Nagar. 5. Dean, College of Basic Sciences and Humanities, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pant Nagar, District Udham Singh Nagar. … Respondents Mr. Pankaj Purohit, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Advocate for the respondents. Coram: Hon’ble Cyriac Joseph, C.J. Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. JUDGMENT CYRIAC JOSEPH, C.J. (Oral) 1. Mr. Pankaj Purohit, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the time being, the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to the second respondent Vice Chancellor, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology to consider and 2 dispose of Annexure 12 representation submitted by the petitioner on 27.09.2004. According to the petitioner, the said representation has not been disposed of so far. Hence, we are inclined to grant the request of the counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Advocate who accepted notice for the second respondent has no objection in issuing such a direction to the second respondent. 2. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Annexure 12 representation dated 27.09.2004 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment before the second respondent for information and compliance. (B.C. Kandpal, J.) (Cyriac Joseph, C.J.) 01.09.2005 01.09.2005 G