^' ^ ^ ^NGLE BENGH' IN THE HON'BLB HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR W.P.ic) No. ^[^ /2011 (D 0 PETITIONBR .<^, *^%^r ^- Santosh Das S/0 Shri Kishnu Das Aged about 36 years Occupation Kotwar R/OVillageNawagaon Post Rakhi ( Mana camp) , Tahsil Aarang Dist - Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS: VERSUS (1) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary , Department of Revenue Mantralaya,D.K. S. Bhawan Raipur ( C.G.) ^(2) Collctor, Raipur Dist-Raipur (C.G.) ^(3) Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Raipur Dist Raipur(C.G.) 7 ^(4)Chief Executive Officer New Raipur Development Authority Telibandha Jedhi Vila Near Natioanl Garage Ring Road Raipur Dist Raipur ( C.G.) ^(5) Nazul Officer Capital Area Development Authority Raipur ( Chhattisgarh ) 'WIMi WRIT PBTITION UNDERARTICLB 226/227 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ ":] \: A\ PETIflOJMER HIGHCOURTORCMHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIXPETtTtON(C) N0.4163 OF 2011 - SantoshDas "•j. Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others <Writ Retition under Arttele 226/227 <^th®Constitution of tndla) Single Bench : Hon'bte Shri Satish K. ^gnihotri, J. RFesent:- 4. Ms. Deepali f?ari<J^, Advoca'te for th^ petitiorwr. Shri Arun Sao, Govwnment Advocate for ttie State. Shri Aman Kesharwani, Advocate on behalf of Shri Sume®h Baia|^ Adyocat®forthe Rsspondent No.4. '^ ORDERfORAU (P^sect <m thfem^ cla^ 2011) At the very outs^, leamed counsel appearw^ for the Sfeate respNondents submits that the representations have been flled by the petitioner befpriB the Collector, Raipur, in the mqnth of July, 2011. The Cottector is taking att necessary steps to decide the represerrtation of the petitloner expeditiously, tn accordanee with the provisions of the orders of the l^al RehabHi^on P^ the Chhaffisgarh Stete, 2007. Some reasonable time is r®s|uir®dto do the needful andassuch, this^petition is prematureattl^s^e.^ ^ Shri Sao, fairty ssubnrrite that ttie decision on the representotton, as aforestated, shall be taken within three monttis after affording an opportunityofhearingitotherespoiidentNo.4. In view of fpregoing, accordjng to the learned counsel f<?r the petitioner.npthingsurvivesforadjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dtsposed of with th®afore-stated observatjon. I 1 SatJshK.AgnJhotri |^;^.-;^-,;^.Judge ^.^.-^, ashok .-..,