W.P. (CT No/ l6g2of2007 Petittoner A^^^^^^^^^^^^^M^ Das Panka, Aged about 35 years, R/o V!!lage Latera, Tahsil Palari, District Raipur (C.G.) Vereus Respondents 1. State ofChhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Revenue, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The ColtectoT, Raipur(C.G.) 3. Sadhram, S/o Makhan Satnami, R/o Village Latera, Tahsil Palari, Dis1rictRaipur(C.G.) SB: t-lon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihofri, J Shri Ashok Soni, Advocate forthe petittoner. Shri Utkarsh Verma, Govemment Advocate tor the respondents No. 1 and2. None for the rfispondent No.3. ORDER (Passed on this 23rd day of Mareh, 2007) 1. By way of this petition thp petitioner seeks to challenge »ieorder dated 28.12.2<X)6(Annexure P/1) passed by the Board of Rsvenue, Circuit Court, Raipur in Revision Case No. R.N714/R/A-6/298/2006 (Manmohan Das Vs. Sadhram & another). 2. Brieffacts. in nutshell, are ttiatthe petitioner is a village v/atehman in vijlage - Latera. While working in the capacity of village Watehman, the petitioner sought for allotment of the land which was eariier given by the then Malgujar to Kotwar Roopdas S/o Shri Ferha Panika. The Tahsildar, Palari registered a Rsvenue Case No. 7/A- 19/20(^-04 and invited objection. Aftsr due enquiry the Tahsildar passed ths order dated 14.6.2004, hofding that the land in dispute is a service !and and at present yj!lage Kotwar is in possession. Being .i ^s*^ B: 14 Thakur aggrieved the pefifioner fifed Appeal Case No. 30/A-^2003-04, which was allowed by the Sub Dwisional o(Rcer(Revenue) Balodabazar, wde order dated 7.10.2005, declaring the petitioner as tandlord of the land in dispute. 3. Thereaftsr, the respondent No.1 filed an appeal before the Additional Coltector, Balodabazar. The Additional Coltector, vide order dated 29.3.20)6, passed in Appeal Case No. 9/A-6/2005-06, set aside the order dated 7.10.2(X)5 (Annexure P/2), passed by the Sub Diwsional Officer (Revenue), hotding that the disputed land i.e. Khasra No. 371. area 0.571 hertare, situated at village - Latera is a service land, on which, ths respondent No.1, being Kotwar of the viltage, is in possession. 4. The petitioner had filed a revision before the Board of Revenue, against the order dated 29,3.2006 (Annexure P/3), passed by the Additional Collector. The Board of Revenue, vide orcter dated 28.12.2006 (Annexure P/1) dismissed the revision, upholding the order dated 29.3.20)6. 5. i have heard teamed counsel for the parties and perused the papers appended to the petition. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused ttie records, t do not find any infirmity or illegality in the order passed by the Board of Revenue. This petition deserves to be and is dismissed. summarily. ^ Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ^ =^?^E^'?a:;'' ?'^S^E5'3~i''s HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GAKH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATI8H K. AGNmOTRI.J. WRIT PETITION CS) No. 1691 of2007 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS B.K.Dewangan, S/o. Late Shri K.R.Dewangan, Aged about 48 years, R/o. 44 Shristi Colony, Rajnandgaon, Presently Posted at Govemment College, Dongargaon as Assistant Professor (Sociology) Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS • : 1. State of ChhattisgaA, Through the Secretary, Higher Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Secretary, Higher Education, Technical Education & Human Resources Science & Technology, Mantralaya, Raipur. 3. The Commissioner, Higher Educatiofl Directorate, Govemment Science College Premises, Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Principal, Govemnient .College, Dongargaon, Distrct Rajnandgaon (C.G.)