^^•^^y^- ^<^w^,\^.l-:-'" ^?,^*-*'" r ^ C"^ /oe>2— IN THE mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BBLASPUR WJ>4s)No. ..^.i^......J2Wi^- H£w.Ra.; / PETITIONER ^ Hemrai_Kumbfakar, aged about years, son of Sfari Bisfaram Kumblikar, Assistant Teacher Govemment Primary School, Bodela, District Rajnandgoan (C.G.) VERSU_S ^ RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhatdsgarh Through Secretary Departtnetit of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur -d^ (C-G-) ^^ 'ef, \'^'^} VI ^S^District Education Officer, Chhuria, A ^c?> District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) o' ^o 3. Block Edueation OfScer Block — Chhuria District - Rajnandgaoa (C.G.) WRITPETITIONU/A 226/277t)F THE CONSTITIJTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOROTHER SUTTABLE WRN'SAND DIRECTIONS The above named petitioner most huably and respectfiilly begs to submitas under:- HI6H COURT OF WHATV1S6ARHATSSLASPW SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WRCT PETTTrON IS.) NO. 464 OF 2007 Petitioner Rewondents verais Hemroi Kumbhkar State of Chhattisgarh and others wprr pETrraoN rs.i NO. 465 OF 2007 Petitioner Restiondents versus Siddhartii Choure State of Chhorttisgarh cnd others WRTT PETTTION (S.) N0. 466 OF 2007 Petitioner Reaaondents versus Panch Ram 5ahu Stnte of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PETmON (5.1 N0. 467 OF 2007 Betjtioner Respondents versus Manharon Lal Pithoujra State of Chhatt-isgarh and oKiers WRTT PETmON (5.1 N0. 468 OF 2007 Petitioner tesoondents versus Yaggaya Datta Baghel State of Chhatl-isgarh and others WRIT PETmON (S.) N0. 469 OF 2007 Petitioner ReOTondents versus Shila Khaperdcy State of Chhattisyirh and others WRTT PFTmON (S.) N0. 470 OF 2007 Petitioner Rewondents versus Radhey Kishun Patel State of Chhatt-isgarh ond others WRTT PETmON fS.) N0. 471 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents yersus AAongan Lal State of Chhatt'isgarh and others WRTT PETTTION CS.) N0. 47Z OF 2007 Petitioner fteaiondents versus t)hal Singh Sonwani State of Chhatt'isgarh ond others WRrrpFnnoN (S.i NO. 473 OF 2007 Petitioner yersus Resoondents Onbar Lal Sonboir State of Chhatt'isyirh cmd others WRFT PFTmON (S.) N0. 474 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents yersus Shiv Kumar Sharma State of Chhatt-isgarh ond others WRIT PETmON fS.l N0. 475 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents yersus Rajendra Kumar Sagar State of Chhattisgarh cnd others WRTT PFTmON (S.) N0. 476 OF 2007 Petitioner ftesoondents verajs Atekhanlal Thakur State of Chhatt'isgarh and others WRIT PETmON (S.) N0. 477 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus Fool Chcnd Kamleshwar State of Chhattisgarh wd others WRTT PETITION (S.) N0. 478 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Re^iondents Rajendro Kumar Dewangan State of Chhatt-isgarh and others And WRIT PETTnON (S.) N0. 479 OF 2007 Petitioner yersys Resoondents Jor/ant Kumar Shendey State of Chhatt-isgarh and others 1. Present : Mr. R.K. Jaiawal, Adwcate for the petitioners. Mr. Sushil Dubey, ©overnment Advocate for tiie S'tate/respondents. ORDER CPassed on 24th Day of Jonuary, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as leamed Sovemment Advocate oppearing for the State/respondents jointly siibmit that •the facts and qu&stion of law involved in the present batch of writ petitions are squarety covered by the decision of this Court hi the coise of Ya^weint Kumw Bhawdw^/ vs. Municlpal Cmporcrl'iwi. tXMy emd anotfw1'. 2. In a.ibsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (jSopesh Kumw Vermavs. Ttie State Gawf. of Chhettisgwii and anffthef) and other connected matters, decided by this ^: Court on 15-12-2006. puraiant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the .Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopat ond the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination. it was clarified that the nomenclature of the Basic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been chonged and renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., &.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate hotders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (^eiA Kumar Vermavs. The S'tate Sovt. of Chhattisgarh ancf awffiei) (Supra). 3. For -the aforementioned reasons. +he writ petitions are di^iosed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yadiwcmt Kumar Sfron»</w<y (Suprn), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.T.I./D.Ed. Certificates at their own e^qienses as per the circuhrs dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether they have heen paid two advonce increments or not. No order as to costs, 4. A copy of this order be placed on •the record of the connected writ petitions. - Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge 1 Z006ai)WJR-CG96 Thakur