^ rawSaii •<-^_Sr .1 '"S' i''';:'- fc ^"^- ( IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fC) No. fl?'2- / 2011 Petitioner RESPONDENTS :1 .o^y/ ^%y/" .'iy' A^p ..-•'' **T)t..'-'' -»" ^•^ •^J ^,- Vineet Singh Construction Co. (P) Ltd. Through: The Managing Director, Reg. Office: Maharana Pratap Colony,Yadunandan Nagar, Near Takshashila School, Tifra Bilaspur (CG).. VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). The Chief Engineer, Hasdeo Basin, Department of Water Resources, Bilaspur (CG). The Superintendent Engineer, Kharung, Water Resources Circle, Bilaspur (CG). The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division, Kharung Distt.: Bilaspur (CG). Alok Agrawal, The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division, Kharung Distt.: Bilaspur (CG) WRIT PETITION- UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. Particulars of the Petitionersi As shown above in the cause title. :i.'i,iiiifeii:^i«4.illtJB*iB&>.(;t'!'.u ^^ •s., HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DB: Hon'bie Shri Dhireridra IVIishra & Hon'ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar, JJ. Writ Petition (Cl No. 1182 of2011 Vineet Singh Construction Co. (P) Ltd. Through : The Managing Director, Reg. Office : Maharana Pratap Colony, Yadunandan Nagar, Near Takshashila School, Tifra Bilaspur (C.G.) Vs. 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. The Chief Engineer, Hasdeo Basin, Department of Water Resources, Bilaspur 3. The Superintendent Engineer, Kharung, Water Resources Cirele, Bilaspur (CG) 4. The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division, Kharung Distt.: Bilaspur 5. Alok Agrawal, The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division, Kharung Distt.: Bilaspur (CG) Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Present: . Shri P.S. Koshy, counsel for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 4th March, 201 1) PerDhirendra Mishra. J Heard. 1. By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for direction to the respondents to release/refund the amount of Earnest Money Deposit, cumulatively to the tune of Rs.31,81,000/-for total 15 numbers of bids against each distinct construction work to the petitioner's company. •^.;. "!I%. ~^*] 1 ^ '^.-, r/~ •' 2. Learned counsei for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already filed collective representation as Annexure P/3, however, respondents have not taken any decision on the representation of the petitioner till date. He further submits that this petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the petitioner's representation within specific 3. Shri Moorthy, learned Deputy Advocate Genera! for the State submits that if the petitioner files fresh representation for return of Earnest Money Deposited by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondent No. 3 within a period of four weeks in accordance with law. 4. !n view of the above submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of with direction to the petitioner to file fresh representation for refund of Earnest Money Deposited by him before the respondent No. 3 within a period of 15 days from today along with copy of this order. The same shall be considered and decided by the said authority by reasoned order within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of representation. 'ijay Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Sdf- R.N. Chandrakar ;e