IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2367 of 2007 Deepak Kumar Mishra, son of Late Vindhyachal Mishra, resident of village Sarai, Tand, P.O. Fulwaria Baheri, P.S. Gurua, District- Gaya, at present resident of New Area Gyanpuri Mohalla at Aurangabad Proper Town, P.S. Aurangabad,District- Aurangabad ………. Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through the Secretary-cum- Commissioner, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna 2.The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.The District Magistrate, Aurangabad, Bihar 4.The District Compassionate Committee, through the Deputy Collector, District Establishment, Aurangabad 5.The Block Development Officer, Barun, Aurangabad ………. Respondents ----------- 2. 23/07/2010 Petitioner claims for his compassionate appointment on the ground of being adopted son of the deceased employee. The fact is that there is not a single document of prior to the death of the deceased employee to show that the deceased had adopted the petitioner. The order of Lok Adalat, Aurangabad on compromise, as contained in Annexure-2, between petitioner and the widow of the deceased will not be a clinching evidence to accept the valid adoption of the petitioner by the deceased. Therefore, this Court does not find any fault with the decision of the Compassionate - 2 - Committee, as contained in Annexure-8, by which application of the petitioner for compassionate appointment was rejected. Petitioner may get a declaration from the competent civil court in respect of his adoption by the deceased employee in accordance with law and thereafter only stake his claim for consideration of his case for compassionate appointment. The writ application is disposed of. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)