IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1133 of 2007 JEEVAN KUMAR JHA & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 5 17.4.2009 For the reasons stated in the limitation petition, it is allowed and the delay in filing of this revision application is condoned. The instant revision application has been preferred against the order dated 12.12.2006 passed by the S.D.J.M., Araria in Bhargama P.S. Case No.81 of 2000, whereby he has altered and add the charge under section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against all the accused persons under section 216 of Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that co- accused Ashok Kumar Jha and Ors have also preferred revision application bearing Cr.Revision No.279 of 2007, before this court against the aforesaid impugned order dated 12.12.2006, and a bench of this court by order dated 11.8.2008 has set aside the impugned order and the trial court was directed to dispose of the case at the earliest. Learned counsel for the Opposite party no.2 submits that on account of poverty the informant could not appear in the aforesaid case to oppose the application. He further submits that the Opposite party no.2 has been put in a position of destitute along with her two minor children. He submits that the petitioner in fact has agreed to maintain Opposite party along with her two minor children 2 KHAN way back on 12.8.2006 but the petitioner has violated his own assurance and has done nothing towards their maintenance. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, it is always open to the parties to adopt reconciliation process, but as the impugned order has already been quashed by a bench of this court in Cr.Revision No. 279 of 2007, the same order setting aside the impugned order is being passed in the instant case also. The instant revision application is thus allowed. (S.P.Singh,J)