1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 6590 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 6590 OF 2010 *** 1. Heard. 2. It is apparent that photostat copy produced before trial Court as certified copy is prepared from the Index Register. The copy shown to this Court also at its last page carries similar endorsement. The rejection by trial Court, therefore, to exhibit that document as it is not covered under section 63 (3) of Evidence Act cannot be said to be either erroneous or perverse. The judgment of Honourable Apex Court in the case of "Ishwar Dass Jain (dead) through L.Rs. V/s Sohan Lal (dead) by L.Rs." reported in AIR 2000 SC 426 states that a certified copy of a document is admissible in evidence. There cannot be any debate for this proposition. 3. As I do not see any jurisdictional error writ petition is rejected. No costs. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 6590 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. Liberty in favour of the petitioner to take appropriate steps before trial Court to prove said documents in accordance with law. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:2/05/2011. ans/6590