^T^ COURT GF THiS CHHATriBGARH AT BILASPUR W.F. 181 No. 3826 of 2010 PetitSoalCT Resposadesits Sona Rain Sahu, aged about 55 years, S/o Late Shri Dharmu Ram Sahu, Headxnaster, posted at Goveninient Middle School, Malika, Distdct- Narayanpur (C.G.) ¥ersiis State of Chhattisgarh Through tlie Secretary, Schedule Caste 85 Schedule Tribe Development Department, Dau Kalyaii Sin.gh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The CoUector fTribal Development), Narayanpur (C.G.) The Assistaiit CoBimissioner, Tribal Developnient, Nai'ayanpur, Distdct- Narayaapur (C.G.) Distdct Education Officer^ Narayaiipur (C.G,) Writ Petitioa uader Article 226 ofthe Coastitution ofladia ^ppe^^Mce: Mr. Somkaut Verma, Advocate for the petitk)ner, Mr, Rajendra Tripaflii, Paael La\vyer for tlie State/respondents on advaiice copy. QRALORDER (36.07.20101 KUMAR SINHA, J. Keaid. The petitloner is worklng on the post of Head Master ia Middle School Malika, Block Narayaiipur. By impugned order dated 15,7.2010, tlie petitioner has been transferred from Middle School, Malika, Block Narayaiipur to Middle School, Daadwaa, Block Narayaapur. A perusal ofAruiexure-P/2 would show fiiat earlier the transfer order of tlie petitloner was amended vide order dated 27.9.2000, He ^/ "'%' W.P.(S)No. 3826 of 2010 was kept iu his origiiial place of posting ie. Govt. Higher Secondaiy School, Narayatipur. In tliis iiiaiiner, tlie petitioner is contiauously posted ui Block Naiayaiipur prior to year 2000 aiid ailer a ven7 long period, he has now beeii ti-aiisferred IFOBI Mahka, Block Narayaiipur to Daiidwaii, Block Nai'ayaiipur, Leai'ned courAsel for tlie petitioner coiild not point out tiiat how tlie order of ti'aiisfer of tiie petitioner is bad-Hi-law. The traiisfer is an iiicidence of service, no person workiiig on a tiaiisferable post can make his claim for posting at a particular place. It is for the eiLiployer to see as to who should be posted at which place, keepiiig iii miiid flie better functioniiig of tlie departiaent as also fhe public iiiterest, Uuless tlie order of tt'ansfer is shown to be vitiated by nialatides or exti'aiieous considerations or it is shown to be passed agaiast aay statutoiy Rule or tlie Act, normally such orders are not to be iaterfered by a court oflaw, is tlie settled view of tlie Apex Court in snany cases. For tlie foregOMig reasons, I do not fiiid aay substaace m. th.e wrlt petltlou. The petitlon is iiable to be disniissed aad is hereby disiaissed. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge •^ft-^