IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 8745 of 2008. Decided on 7th December, 2010. Anam Sharma. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that though he had been working as Junior Engineer w.e.f. 1st May, 1992, however, he has been regularized as Clerk vide office order dated 19th September, 2002 (Annexure A-1). 2. According to the averments contained in the reply, the petitioner had been working as Junior Engineer w.e.f. 1st May, 1992 and had completed 10 years service uninterruptedly, thus his case ought to have been considered for the post of Junior Engineer instead of Clerk. 3. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of petitioner for the post of Junior Engineer immediately after completion of ten years continuous service with all consequential benefits, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. [ (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 07, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - - 3 -