IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIIA$PUR(CHHATTI$GARH) wRIT PETHION No. Légé ‘/2002 y A ,*_-.A WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE %OF TEE CONSTITUTXON OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS; CERTIGRARI EKND FOR 0:13I-E SUTLTABLE WRIT OR WRI'I‘S! ORDER r OR .ORDERS¢ DIRECTION OR DIRECTION$. 1° PARTCULARS OF THE PETITIONER : I As shown above in the cause title. PARTECULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS : As ehon above in the cause title. w oezoo. u R PETI‘I‘IONER $mt.Chandrabhaga Bal, /"”7 W/o. Babulal Dow Through her Power o£ Attorney M7 Holder, Babxilal Soni, \Jc"._ y 8/0; Bénéhilal Soni: \ M y 8" .O" ..... R/o. Gw. Raad, Ra 3 nandgaoh, Tahgll & Dist. (C.G.) Rdjngndgaon Versus RESPONDENTS g5” State of Chhattisgarh} Through Secretary. Department of‘Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Collector & Ex—Of£icio Dy. Secretary, Department of Revenue, Government of Chhattlsgarh. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Chhattisgarh State Ware Housing Corporation. Through its Managing Director? Raipur (C.G.) M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 1686 of2002 PETITIONER ‘ Smt Chandrabhaga Bai. VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh & Others. RESPONDENTS WRITW PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Sathh K. Agnihotrl'. J. w r) .‘K Present: Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General for the Sta‘te/ respondent No. 1 and 2. Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri B.D.Guru, Advocate for the respondent No. 3. O R D E R (Passed on 24d; day ofNovember, 20} 1) l. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions; submits that since new cause of action has arisen, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this-petition with liberty to agitate the same. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side have no objection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with th aforestated liberty, ifso advised. r/ s‘ . . “K. Ag“ 5g? jndge‘ “Ogi \ . it Amit‘ ‘ e . x d!