IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 4687 of 2008. Decided on: 27.07.2010. __________________________________________________________ Satish Paul. … Petitioner. Versus H.P. Krishi Vishwa Vidalaya and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Subhash Sharma, Advocate For the Respondents. : Mr. Lokender Paul Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.1. None for respondent No.2. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. Subhash Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that due to subsequent developments, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the same is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. July 27, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?