IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 663 OF 2010 IN STAMP NUMBER (APPLN.) NO. 2329 OF 2010 KARIM KHAN MOHAMAD GAUNS KHAN SHIGAO ... Applicant Versus SHRI MABLO FATTO AND ORS., ... Respondents Mr. S.S. Kakodkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. A. R. Kantak, Advocate for Respondent no.2. Coram:- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date:- 8th April, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. S. Kakodkar, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of Applicant and Mr. A. R. Kantak, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of Respondent no. 2. 2. Report from the Registry shows that the other Respondents are duly served. There is no affidvait in reply. 3. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 986 days in bringing the heirs of deceased Respondent no. 6 on record. Having perused this application, I am satisfied that sufficient cause has been made out for delay. There is no case of negligence or lack of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. 4. In these circumstances, this application is made absolute in terms of para 6 of the application. Delay is condoned. Heirs be brought on record by carrying out necessary amendment within a period of two weeks from today. 5. Registry to thereafter proceed and place the appeal for hearing and final disposal. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. vn