vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1149 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9274 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.9274 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.9274 OF 2007 M/s.Shiv Santosh Dugdhalay ... Petitioner V/s. Yashwant D. Purandare ... Respondent Mr.N.A. Kulkarni for Petitioner Ms.Smita Gaidhani for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J MHATRE, J MHATRE, J. DATED: JULY 30, 2008 JULY 30, 2008 JULY 30, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The writ petition has already been admitted. The question now is whether any interim relief should be granted to the petitioner. In my opinion, the order of the Industrial Court would have to be stayed but on certain conditions. The order of the Industrial Court passed in the revision application is dated 16.11.2007. Thus, although there was an order directing reinstatement, the petitioner has not reinstated the workman. The present petition has been admitted on 17.12.2007. In my view, the following order would meet the ends of justice: i) The petitioner shall deposit the wages payable to the workman from 16.11.007 upto today within a period of 4 weeks from today. The : 2 : petitioner will fix the wages according to the amount which the respondent would have drawn had he been reinstated in service in accordance with the order of the Labour Court. ii) The aforesaid amount can be withdrawn by the respondent on furnishing security to the satisfaction of the Registrar General. 2. Petition expedited.