Crl. Misc No. M 3102 OF 2011 ****** Baljeet alias Kala vs State of Haryana Present : Mr. S.K.Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmohan Sikka, DAG Haryana ******* The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.859, dated 17.12.2010, registered under Sections 452, 506, 427, 34 of the IPC, at Police Station City Rohtak. Counsel for the respondent, on instructions from ASI Bani Singh, states that the complainant did not come along with the petitioner to corroborate the factum of compromise. Counsel for the petitioner, however, states that the complainant has told the petitioner that though he has compromised the matter, he is not interested in going to the police station. I have myself compared the signatures of the complainant on the alleged compromise and on the complaint which he has given to the police. At first sight, it does not seem to be in-genuine. It is also not disputed that there are no allegations of violence against any person. In these circumstances, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Consequently, in the event of his arrest, the Investigating Officer shall release him on anticipatory bail to his satisfaction subject to the conditions contained in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) March 03, 2011. JUDGE `kk'