^- T 'HC-22 TE? ^i<<id*l, dTi1ti'i<i. f»«'ii'yy ^Ut.^...5^.^ HINMI <h«l<») 'V^f 200 fcfdiiy' 3R1^?T^iT ft-ii* snjST ai1 ^ft^ sn^i ?^IRIT'HfOT S.B. HOWBLB SHR!JOH!R]CTi|DRAM!SHRA, J W.BCNo,3046 QF 2008 Writpetitipn under Artlcle PETn'IONER RESPONDENTS of Indla Y^shwant Singh Lodhi |/o Shri Oaind Singh Lodhi Afee about —— R^sident of Villagee-Parsada T^h.-Dhamdha, Distt. Durg (CG) VEtlSUS 4 •tll«li<-]<ill'iWvS ^^S (fa^lt iisif'gnsn^t 226/227 of the Constitutlon State of Chhattisgarh, Department of Revenue, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Ralpiu' (CG) State ofChhattisgarh Department of Panchayat & Rural Development, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) District Collecotr, Dm-g, Distt. Durg (CG) Sub-Divisioiial Qfiiicer, Durg, District Dui^ (CG) Tahsildar, Dur^ Durg (CG) District iy-:ifai^;:BJ C-22 311^1-q>I k-f'l'h sy^i stiw'dftg ~~F -=T -s'si •^iiiiicft), ^•dl'y'itS. facii'M^ 3iT^?r ira^ 11KWI g,^jq,-----~-------g^ 200 'fN^CT' aiI^T TOHWHfeT d 20.6.2008 Shri C.R. Sahu, counse Shri Arun Sao, GA for the peqtioner Sarpa^ich Grievance of the proceedlr^s against the peti^ govemment land, his hous^ property of the petitioner pi-f Supurdnama to fhe Sagni, Tahsil-Dhamdha, petitioner applled for retum) concemed Naib TahsadaT/re|sponder Sarpanch/respondent No.7 movable property to fhe 26.4.2007 & 5.10.2007 (Ann|sxure of Naib Tahsildar/respondei^t with by fhe Sarpanch/restwndent coiuplained against the act c(f ^raferft^'qriRff •?fs^t TfSnsre '^3tf;WatI^I Naib TahsUdar, Tah. Qhamdha, Distt. DUI'E (CG) Sarpanch, Grainpanchayat, Village Sagni, Tah. Dhamdha, Distt. DLU^ (CQ) for the petitioner. State/respondents. is that diiring eviction tioner froni encroachinent of (he was deinoUshed and movable ;sent in his house was gtven on of Grampanchayat-ViUage- pistfc Durg. Thereafter, the of his movable property to the •ejspondent No.6, who dwected fhe to restore possession of the plstitioner vide his orders dated n)sxure P/4). However, the orders No. 6 tiave not been complied No. 7. The petitioner the Sarpanch/respondenf No.7 [4 311^1'^T k-<w sr^y ailiti'dfi^ 'S^ss •^W\v\t\, a'nl'y'i®.i<«-li*i'i< sn^yr xig^ 111CTI g,^,,, --—-•—-••--•^ ^gg "fe^g' sii^iTCnwg^r rec before the Naib Tahsildar/l Collector/respondent No. 3. fhe above authorities to ens given on Supurdrtania to fh retnmed to the petitioner. The petitioner has alsc Deputy Inspector General appropriate criminal proce( person. However, the petitioi to obtain custody of his owr) possession by fhe reven^ Supurdnama to Sarpanc^ circumstances, the petitioncji the concemed Naib Tahsildar retum ofhls movable proper{y. Lesuned coi.msel for tlfie petition is disposed of as pra^ In view of above, the u a direction to the petitioner before the Naib TahsUdar, No.6, raising his yievances which shaU be decided by [»l<<i<"l<i1l *4Wi<i( ^ fel& <Fi|4<il< ^i-arfigii aii^r ^pondent No.6 as also before the [However, no action was taken by (ire that the property, which was Sarpanch/respondent No. 7 is complained about the same to of Police, Dvrg for initiatins idings against fhe responsible icr is runntag frorn piUar to post property, which was taken into |ie authorities and given on li/respondent No.7. In fhese r prays for suitable direction to to take necessary action for State has no objection if the ed for. irtstant petition is disposed of wifh [o malce a srutable representation Dpiamdha, Distfc Durg/respondent raised in the instant petition, the Naib Tahsfldar/respondent T -HC-22 ^si ^Wv}-^, W-AWIQ. hwwy. 3TI^T xr^g? HWfll Shlich"""""""""""""""""""""'W^ 200 fN^ST" an^r^r. R-<i.+ sii^r s^flN •nfi^ ^ 3iii?i'reirar ^if?g ^ No.6 within a period of 15 da^ representation so ffled, ui accc| A copy of fhis order bej Collector, Durg/respondent N)o duly complied with. ^ral^Tift'l ^wcff'^ k'^\ <Fn^K ^? aiPrTiT sn^r s from fhe date ofreceipt of thc irdance wifh. law. also forwarded to (he District ).3 to ensiire that this order is Sdf-:^- Dhirendra Mishra Judge [^ ^Ra^l \,ii