THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO.29996 OF 2010 Dt:01-12-2010. BETWEEN: THE CHURCH OF SOUTH INDIA TRUST ASSOCIATION, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT .. PETITIONER AND THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER CUM REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT AND OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO.29996 OF 2010 O R D E R : This writ petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in referring the Award No.8/2007, dated 7.3.2007 to the learned Senior Civil Judge, Nuzvid, under section 31(2) of the Land Acquisition Act in respect of acquisition of land admeasuring Ac.5-06 cents in Survey Nos.3/1B, 15/1B and 15/2A1 of Vidyanagar, H/o Pinapaka village, G.Konduru Mandal, Krishna District, even though the dispute is decided between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent by a competent civil court, which became final, as arbitrary, illegal, unauthorised and violative of the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act and consequently to direct the Senior Civil Judge, Nuzvid, Krishna District to pay entire outstanding amounts lying in the credit of LAOP.No.72 of 2007 to the petitioner. At the outset I am of the opinion that this writ petition is misconceived. Once the matter is referred to the competent Civil Court for its adjudication under section 31(2) of the Land Acquisition Act it is for the said court to take appropriate steps including release of the amounts etc., but, it is not for this court to direct the Civil Court to release the amounts in favour of the petitioner, may be the petitioner obtained a decree from the competent court declaring that he is the owner of the schedule property. The apprehension of the petitioner seems to be that the 2nd respondent having accepted the fact that the decree was obtained by the petitioner has stated that he had already sold away the property to third parties even before the suit was decreed and therefore requested the Civil Court to disburse the amount in favour of third parties and the third parties are approaching the court by way of filing petition under Order I Rule 10 of CPC for getting impleadment and if this is permitted it will delay the disposal of O.P. But, disposal of this writ petition in this shape is not maintainable. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. However, the learned Senior Civil Judge, Nuzvid is directed to expedite the hearing of the earlier L.A.O.P.No.72 of 2007 and pass final proceedings within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Dt:01-12-2010. ( C.V.RAMULU, J ) tnb THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO.29996 OF 2010 DT: 01-12-2010.