1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 622/10 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 345 OF 2009. Deepak @ Pradip Shriram Dhavle & another .vs. State of Maharashtra. __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders. Registrars orders. Mr. Anil Mardikar, Advocate with Mr. S.V. Sirpurkar, Advocate for applicants/appellants, Mrs. B.H. Dangre, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C. J. & A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 8, 2010. P.C. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicants/appellants and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State. This is an application for suspension of sentence and for releasing the applicants on bail during the pendency of the appeal challenging the conviction of the applicants/appellants for the offences punishable under Section 302, 498-A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for which the appellants are sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and rigorous imprisonment for 2 years. Having heard the learned Counsel for the applicants/appellants and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent, 2 we do not consider this to be a fit case for suspending the sentence and for releasing the applicants on bail. The application is, therefore, dismissed. The learned Counsel for the applicants/appellants, however, submits that the appellant no.2 is a lady aged about 61 years. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we make it clear that in case the appeal is not heard within one year from today, it is open to the appellant no.2 Sau. Nirmala w/o Shriram Dhavle to move this Court again with an application for similar prayer. The appellants may file paper-book within two months from today. CHIEF JUSTICE J. JUDGE.