IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.THANKAPPAN MONDAY, THE 26TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 7TH PHALGUNA 1928 RP.No. 177 of 2007(F) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.2785/2005 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/IST RESPONDENT: ---------------------------------- PARAPPANANGADI REGIONAL HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PARAPPANANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER & 2ND RESPONDENT ---------------------------------------- 1. SUCHETHANAN, S/O.LATE BHASKARAN, KANNANTHARA HOUSE, P.O.ARIYALLUR, VALLIKKUNNU. 2. SALE OFFICER, PARAPPANANGADI, PONNANI & KONDOTTY, HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY GROUP, PARAPPANANGADI. BY ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/02/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. THANKAPPAN, J. -------------------------------------- R.P.NO.177 OF 2007 in W.P.(C).No.2785 OF 2005-f --------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of February, 2007. O R D E R Though this petition is filed to review the order, it appears that the petitioner Bank is aggrieved by the non- compliance of the interim order passed by this Court by which the 1st respondent/the petitioner in the writ petition was directed to remit an amount of Rs.50,000/=. The said amount was not paid and on a mistaken motion, this Court had taken that Rs.50,000/= has already been paid. 2. In the above circumstances, it is made clear that if the 1st respondent/the petitioner in the writ petition has not complied with the interim order, the order passed by this Court will not stand in the way of the petitioner Bank to proceed against the 1st respondent/the petitioner in the writ petition as per law. With the above clarification, this petition is closed. K. THANKAPPAN, JUDGE. 2 cl