IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO.15335 OF 2009 TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND NINE Between: S. Venkateswara Rao @ Kondaiah, Hyderabad .... Petitioner. And: Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. By its Secretary (Home) Secretariat, Hyderabad and 3 others. ....Respondents. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO.15335 OF 2009 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed seeking for declaring the action of the respondents in not taking any action pursuant to the representation dated 4.7.2009 as illegal, null and void and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondents not to interfere with the peaceful life of the petitioner and to pass such suitable orders. The case of the petitioner is that he is a tenant in flat No.1/c, Vishal Towers, Navodaya Colony, Yellareddyguda, Hyderabad and staying in the flat for the last 4 years and the petitioner is paying rents regularly. It is further stated that there was a small difference arose between himself and his landlord. The petitioner filed a suit in OS No.1392 of 2008 before the VII Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad and obtained status quo order in IA No.403 of 2009 on 29.4.2008 and the same is continuing. While things stood thus, when the landlord started creating harassment, the petitioner lodged a complaint before the 3rd respondent herein on 11.5.2008, but surprisingly the 4th respondent started calling the petitioner to the police station by sending constables every day. Then the petitioner made a complaint to the 2nd respondent-Commissioner of Police on 4.7.2009 as some of the persons along with his landlords came to his house and creating problem and then immediately the petitioner made a complaint to the 3rd respondent-police and ultimately when the 3rd respondent failed to take any action, the petitioner again made a complaint to the 2nd respondent on 4.7.2009. It is also stated that the 4th respondent inspite of informing about the civil case, frequently and every day coming to the house of the petitioner and threatening his family members. Hence this writ petition. On behalf of the Government, the learned Government Pleader for Home submitted that on the representation of the petitioner dated 4.7.2009 addressed to the Commissioner of police, Hyderabad duly marking the copies to all superior officers, wherein he stated that he obtained status-quo orders dated 29.4.2008 in IA No.403 of 2008 in OS No.1392 of 2008 on the file of VII Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad against his land lord. He also lodged a complaint on 11.5.2008 before the 3rd respondent. After detailed enquiry it is revealed that the matter is civil in nature. It is further stated that due to differences the petitioner filed the above mentioned suit. It is stated that the land lord’s son-in-law Mr. Ramachandra Reddy and his wife Smt B.Vidya approached the petitioner to collect the rents due, the petitioner abused them and thereby the said Mr. Ramachandra Reddy lodged a complaint before the police on 19.6.2009. The Sub Inspector of Police Sri B. Yada Reddy who received the complaint and made G.D entry and directed the patrolling staff to cause enquiry. It is stated that on 2.7.2009 on the complaint of Dr. P. Kalpana, a case in Crime No.743 of 2009 under Section 509, 354, 506 of I.P.C was registered by the Sub Inspector of Police and enquired into the matter. It is also stated that the petitioner also lodged a complaint against his land lord, son-in-law and daughters and 4 others alleging their trespass into the premises and threatened him to dispossess the premises and on receiving the same, the Sub Inspector of Police registered a case in Crime No.749 of 2009 under Section 448, 506 IPC and investigating into by the Sub Inspector of Police Sri N. Ravinder. It is also stated that as and when complaints received from both the parties, the police visited for causing enquiries without any personal interest in their dispute. The Sub Inspector of Police Sri M. Gurappa is the sector incharge of the said area and investigating officer of the case registered against the petitioner. The petitioner filed this writ petition with baseless allegations with an intention to frighten the local police. It is stated that after due enquiry the Inspector of Police, Banjara Hills submitted a report to the superior officer dated 3.8.2009. Having regard to the averments made in the writ petition and also the submissions made by the learned Government Pleader for Home, basing on the written instructions filed before this Court and having regard to the complaints of the petitioner and the complaints against the petitioner by the un-official respondent i.e., 4th respondent herein, the police authorities have investigated into the matter and in the process of investigation, the police officials visited the house of the petitioner for causing enquiries without any personal interest in their dispute, but not with an intention to harass the petitioner at all. In the light of the same, this Court is of the considered opinion that the officials of the police have approached the petitioner only in the process of the investigation, but not with an intention to harass the petitioner and therefore, no further orders need be passed in this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _______________ G.CHANDRAIAH September 22, 2009 GK. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO.15335 OF 2009 DATE:22.09.2009 GK.