IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6627 of 2011 CHANDAN KUMAR, S/O-DEVLAL SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05 20.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Although, the victim has stated in her statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. that she was forcibly taken away by the petitioner and co-accused Prabhat Kumar and subsequently, she was made captive in a room where petitioner and co-accused Prabhat Kumar committed rape on her but admittedly, having similar allegation, co- accused Prabhat Kumar has already been granted privilege of bail by another Bench of this Court vide order dated 30.03.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 39462 of 2010. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that, as a matter of fact, there was love affair between the victim and the petitioner and she spent more than one month with petitioner by her own sweet will but subsequently, she gave misleading statement before the court being pressurized by her parents. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Mohiuddinnagar P.S. Case No. 25 of 2010. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)