IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2009 / 12TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 15107 of 2009(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ GOPAKUMAR.K.S., DHANYA, T.C.9/1320/2, UNNITHAN LANE, SASTAMANGALAM P.O., PIN-695010. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KOLLAM. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, KARUNAGAPPALLY. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, KARUNAGAPPALLY. 4. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, THEVALAKKARA. 5. SATHI, NANDU BHAVANAM, MULLIKKALA, THEVALAKKARA P.O., PIN-690 524. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 15107 OF 2009 (G) ===================== Dated this the 2nd day of June, 2009 J U D G M E N T The allegation in this writ petition is that when the 5th respondent applied for supply of power, as the line has to be drawn through the petitioner's property, he raised objections. It is stated that without getting the matter resolved by approaching the Additional District Magistrate, respondents 2 to 5 are attempting to draw the line. It is with this complaint the writ petition is filed. 2. Learned standing counsel appearing for respondents 2 to 4 has, on instructions, informed that on 7.5.2009, the Additional District Magistrate has passed orders exercising his powers under the Telegraph Act enabling the said respondents to draw the line. If that be so, any action taken by the above respondents on the strength of the said order cannot be said to be illegal. 3. It is for the petitioner to seek his remedies against the order passed by the Additional District Magistrate, if he is so aggrieved. Writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp