IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 21669 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 01st December, 2011. Gursimranjeet Singh Petitioner through Mr. Achin Gupta, Advocate Versus Punjab Technical University & Ors. Respondents through Mr. Amrit Paul, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. Mr. S.S.Bhinder, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner is a student of B.Tech. [Electrical] in respondent No. 2 College of Engineering and Technology. The petitioner was involved in a brawl with his colleagues which led to initiation of disciplinary action against him and he was suspended from attending the classes. The petitioner was in 3rd Semester of the Course at that time. The aggrieved petitioner has approached this Court and vide order dated 06.12.2010, a Co-ordinate Bench permitted the petitioner to attend classes and appear in the examination, subject to the final outcome of the writ petition. The petitioner has meanwhile completed 3rd and 4th Semesters and he is near completion of 5th Semester. On a query about the petitioner's conduct during the pendency of the writ petition, Mr. Bhinder, counsel for respondent No. 2 informs that the petitioner's father made a false complaint against one of the Professors of the College for demanding bribe which was inquired into by a Senior IAS Officer and found false. Based upon the said inquiry, the Government vide Memo dated 11.08.2011 [Annexure R2/7] has recommended action against the complainant. The petitioner, however, has not been found to be involved in any other incident. In these circumstances and while taking a lenient view so that the future of the petitioner is not marred, I allow the writ petition to the extent that the order of suspension of the petitioner is directed to be kept in abeyance [but not set aside], subject to the condition that he and his father shall tender un-conditional apology in writing to the Professor concerned as well the Principal of the Institute. Both of them shall give an undertaking that in future, the petitioner shall not indulge in any false accusation or other illegal activities. The Principal and other senior Faculty Members of the College shall randomly watch the work and conduct of the petitioner and in case on a preliminary inquiry, if so required to be held by a Committee of three senior Faculty Members, it is found that the petitioner did not mend his ways and he is likely to spoil the environment of the Institute, the Authorities shall be at liberty to revive the order of suspension. The directions issued here-in-above are on the parity of an accused being released on probation without exonerating him of the charges. In view of the fact that the allegations levelled by the father of the petitioner against the Professor have been found to be false, he shall stand exonerated honourably and no red entry in his service record shall be read into for any service benefit. The Authorities, however, may sympathetically consider the request of the petitioner for condonation of his lecturers, if any, caused due to his suspension. Disposed of. Dasti. December 01, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE