o ,?.\00( 'fWf' ti-.is't* INTHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W.PNOJ 15^/2006 PETITIONER: / ...•/ _ ' Gulab Chandra Partdey, son of ^^f^r ^ Late Shri Hradaynarayan Pandey, .^^ '^~^ .-•' aged 76 years, R/o. Juna Bilaspur, /^/"0'/? ...•• District Bilaspur (C.G.) ^>'f^xLv/ ./••"^^•^" ^^€>y ^.^'y RE IDENTS: VERSUS 1. A ^^ <y/^ State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Revenue, Government of Chhattisgarh, D.K. Bhavan, Raipur A/ / •• '1'$*'^ ^\ /A ^^ ^y^ /'ft>\')) <s-' ^••vy/- ^ v^° ..^ ^ G' v 2. Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur Through Commissioner, Municipal Council, Bilaspur 3. Tehsildar, Bilaspur 4. Sub Divisional Officer, Bilaspur 5. Collector, Bilaspur / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF_ INDIA FOR ISSUANCB OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS / CERTIORARI ETC OR DIRECTION (St / ORDERIS) IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. XI-HC-22 75T -i<l^|l?<'ll, 0Tll«'l<a, [slCII'My wowTgiifrai P-M.0....1^132/2-^i?6- ••^ 200 ^^ET' SfI^F^iT h-u* sn^r ?r>*iich ^ffifl k- ^ SD^T ?^ITW^ft? 0.1 561 Dr. N.K. Shiikla, Sr. Advocal couiisel for fhe petitioner, . Shri Yashwaat Singh, State/respondents No. l, 3, 4 &. 5. ihri A.S. Kachhuwaha, Adv<[ Corpoiation, Bflaspur,/ respondent] 71,/2006. Hepjd. t-eai'ned counsel for the pe| bearing Khasra No. 561/2 and notice issued by tlie Tehsildar, BiS^ L,and Reveniie Code, 1959. His sulj No. 561/2 is concenied, the. petitio plot and is holding title ofthe saiai this plot .is not a Nazul plot or rev^ a proceeding under Section 248 o^ be non est aad nultit;- in eye ofla^- in the garb of this D.0tice, Tehsfldaij District AdriLmisti'ation are bent uj^i petitioner which is.:staiidiBg on tli^ subniission is that some protectiv^ of fhe petitioner aad the house of afoicsaid Khasra nuiuber be prote|< petitiouer is evicted in due course te with Shri Shafle.ndra Shukla, Govt. Advocate for the i^cate appears for the Municipal No, 2 on Caveat petition No. cti]^[<vt^{ {ff'R(viT'? f^^ i^l-^K ^? siPtpT an^r rev^nue titioner siibinits that the land P 1/4 EU-e silbject inatter of.flie [spui under Section 248 of C.G. niission is fhat so far as Khasra aer is flie owner ofthe aforesaid •• His. fui-thersubiaission is fha.t ;nue plot (Govt. land), therefore, fhe Laad Revenue Code would '. Leanied counsel subniits that and the other authorities of fbS to deinoUtion of hoiise ofthe part ofKhasi-a No. 561/2. His order niay be passed iii favour the petitioner standing on flie cted at least tffl tlie period, the of law. He furtlier subm.its. that 'tRrt lOon XI-HG-22 '3'ei .<<i<ilcw, an1y<is, facliuy 3TT^?r q?ra? M'&M^.M.S^Z^o:^'... "^200 lltlCTI (hHlch fq^ff" •ai^i^ii h-u^i s^t sniwHfig ttie ItttgatioD. ia rekition to this pli ultimately th.e contents of the var tllis Ktiasra nuniber would shov land, therefore, at any rate the fhe Land Revenzie.Code cannot be On. fhe other hand, leame' fhat fh.e uisputed questions of petitioner which ultuB.ately culm: csuinot be the subject niatter appropriate ordcrs caa be passec i-f~- The siibinission of leamj Corporatioii is fhat fhe land Tehsfldar is having jurisdiction Revqnue Code to draw ttie proceecj writ petition sfaould be dismissed.l After llearuig the leanied perusiag the records of fhe wri[ enteiteui this writ petition by callf counscl aad also by fhe Muni4 aature oflanj^vhich accordiag to Adnu.ttedly, at ftiis stage. o^: the Land Revenue Code has beeiJ! petitioner is hav-ing full opportun^: 4'l^^pfl'T fVf^f ^ f^l '<f^?SR ^r affigii sn^i jt hasweat upto High Court and jous orders passed in relation to that fhis is aot a government IrQceeding under. Section 248 of 1 counsel for fhe State submits Ifacts have beeu raised by fhe iiates iuto a civfl dispxite which. 6f the wiit petition and no in tlie writ petition filed by fhe "d counsel for the Miiaicipal 3 a goveminent laad and fhe iinder Sectioa 248 of the Laad & aBtn tjouasel 'for fhe parties, aiid after petition, 1 ain not inclined to Ufng upon to f3e regly by the State ipal Coi-poration on qiiestion of setitioner is not a Govt. law. |ily a notice under^Section 248 of issued to fhc petrdoner and fhe ty to appear before tiie coacemed f- g^ XI-HC-22 's^ '^W\v\ti, W\WIG, hwvy. 3TT^?T X[?q? W.P.^Q, \^7 W*IWT ^fiW^h '2.00 6 "g^ 200 [cffc^ST' an^i'^i K;-li?b 311^1 _sh^ict) <if?a S-. ,rt-^' \,'A '^, •^ '^/ ^ltv,-. Tehsildar and to file liis claim id show fhat' fe lcuid is not a gbvenlinient land The Tel TehsfldaT pJter due ei4:[iUTy avajlab tliat fh.e land is not a govemnid: pass suitable final oriers iinder Code on the basis ofataterial So far as apprehension of docum.ents have been filed .bef4 proposed to be taken agaiast fhe aud obseived that when a. proceit the authorily under the sl authority as weU as other iacluding the respondents would would certaialy wait for tlie def reudered by the Tehsildar after 4 the Laiid Reveaue Code aad shajl by a process uiikuowu to law, Wifh the aforesaid observat of at the niotion stage wifh Ubert^ ras.e fhe'coucerned Tehsildar and decided in accordaace wifh law Revenue Code, The petition sta^ids suiu^ petition No. 71/2006 stsuids disc^ 4)('4td4)'1 'tfPq^f ^ f^St' <^l^l< ^srfiwan^r relation to his owuership.aild to la. ^uiiy, if coines to fhe conchision nt laiid then ultunately he shaU Bection 248 ofthe Laiid Revenue tlable before liiin. ^lemolition is concenied,-no such te m.e to show any siick action ^etitioner. However, it is expected •dhig has already been diawn by litory provisions, fhe statutory co^icemed goyeminent aiithorities |respect fhe provisions oflawaad (sision which shaU ultimately be ^ue eriquii^r tinder Sectioa 248 of not step into forceful denioUtiou aon, the petition stands disposed to tlie petitioner to appear before his obiections which- shaU be iindei: Section 248 of the Land ^narfly disposed of The^C&veat sd!.rS^a —ssinha ['qt^-'^f^' '%•-