IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10586 of 2002 Between : 1 A.Harindar Reddy S/o.Late A.Narasimha Reddy R/o.H.No.2-10-158, Uppal, R.R.District. 2 T.Ravi Goud, S/o.T.Srisailam Goud, R/o.H.No.1-97, Boduppal, R.R.District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Uppal Kalan Muncipality Rep.by its Commissioner, Uppal, R.R.District. 2 M.Jagan Reddy S/o.Late Narasimha Reddy, R/o.Uppal, R.R.District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or writ one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in File No.F-45/2002, dt.9-5-2002, permitting the 2nd respondent to collect the fee from vehicle owners, drivers, sand lorries, brick lorries, stone lorries and crushers without notifying same for public auction and contrary to notification in File No.F/45/2002, dt.20.2.2002 as arbitrary, illegal unjust and unconstitutional and consequently call for the records in Proc.No.F/4/2002, dt.9-5-2002. Counsel for the Petitioners : SMT.N.SHOBA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.POLISETTY RADHA KRISHNA(SC FOR MPL(TA)) The Court made the following : ORDER : When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for either of the parties. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 8th June 2009 ajr