IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 28TH JUNE 2011 / 7TH ASHADHA 1933 OP.No. 33773 of 2001(U) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- USAF, S/O. MOHAMMED KASSIM, AGED 38,RESIDING AT VANNANVILAKOM HOUSE, VETTOOR.P.O., VARKALA, TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.T.H.ABDUL AZEEZ, SRI.M.CHANDRAN, SRI.M.NAFIH. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. TAHASILDAR, CHIRAYINKIL TALUK, ATTINGAL. 3. EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KERALA STATE MOTOR VEHICLE WELFARE BOARD, TRIVANDRUM. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE, R3 BY SRI.PAULSON C.VARGHESE,S.C,K.M.T.W.F BOARD, ADV. SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN. THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/06/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.33773/2001: ORDER ON C.M.P. NO.55173/2001 IN O.P. NO. 33773/2001-U DISMISSED 28/06/2011. SD/- T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBIT: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE R.R. PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PETITIONER FOR REALISATION OF RS.29604/- FROM THE PETITIONER ASSETS AND PETTIONER PROPERTY OF 4.17 CENTS IN VETTOR VILLAGE IN SURVEY 41/24. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------------- O.P.No.33773 Of 2001 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2011 J U D G M E N T This Original Petition is filed by the petitioner challenging revenue recovery action as evident from Exhibit P1 notice. This Court passed an interim order of stay for a period of two weeks on 8.11.2001 and it was being extended from time to time and finally it was extended by two months from 21.1.2002 and thereafter it was not extended also. 2. It appears that the demand represents the amount under the Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Act and certain other dues. Evidently, the proceedings based on which the revenue recovery proceedings have been initiated are not under challenge in this Original Petition. Therefore it is upto the petitioner to challenge it in appropriate proceedings. In that view of the matter, the Original Petition is dismissed. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. dsn