IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7883 of 2010 ANJANI KUMAR SHARMA S/O RAMDAYAL SHARMA R/O VILLAGE-RAMATPUR PS- BHAGWANPUR,DISTT-KAIMUR BHABHUA-----------------------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECY. DEPTT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE SECY. DEPTT. OF PRIMARY & ADULT EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR 5. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR 6. THE D.S.E., KAIMUR, BHABHUA 7. BLOCK PRAMUKH, PANCHAYAT SAMITI,BHAGWANPUR,KAIMUR 8. B.D.O. BHAGWANPUR,KAIMUR 9. THE B.E.E.O, BHAGWANPUR, KAIMUR 10. THE HEADMASTER, MIDDLE SCHOOL BHAGWANPUR,KAIMUR 11. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, BHAGWANPUR, KAIMUR 12. THE PANCHAYAT SECY. GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, BHAGWANPUR,KAIMUR, BHABHUA 13. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT RAJ OFFICER KAIMUR, BHABHUA----------------------------RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 29.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The question of law basically with regard to violation of the rules of natural justice to some extent does merit consideration but not at the level of the High Court at this stage. Petitioner has remedy under law either to move the appellate authority or even the District Superintendent of Education who has enclosed the list of names contained in annexure-7 series who were found to be below 18 years of age who came to be employed as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra. This writ application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to choose the forum which he would like to. Let a decision be taken irrespective of the order contained in annexure-7 on its own merit. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)