IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11336 of 2006 ================================================== Bijli Prasad Singh @ Bijli Singh son of late Hari Narayan Singh, Originally resident of village Pakra, Police Station Naugachhia District Bhagalpur and at present of village Chandi, Police Station Sadar District Purnia. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Collector, Purnia. 3. The Anchal Adhikari, Purnia, East Anchal within the district of Purnia. 4. Sri Sita Ram Sah son of late Laltu Sah, Originally residing at Kasba Bakzar, Police Station Kasba District Purnia and at present at Ranipatra Bazar, Police Station Sadar Purnia. 5. Sri Bhagirath Singh son of late Ram Prasad Singh. 6. Sri Gopal Poddar son of late Parmkeshwar Poddar. 7. Smt. Arti Devi wife of Shri Ram Vijay Jha. No. 5 to 7 are residents of Rani Patra, Police Station Sadar District Purnia. .... .... Respondents ================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Prasad Ambastha Mr. Rama Nand Poddar Mr. Ravindra Kr.Choudhary For the Respondent/s : Mr. (AAG-1) Mr. Om Prakash Singh ================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 6. 22-03-2013 Heard Sri Arun Prasad Ambastha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R. K. Priyadarshi, learned A.C. to Addl. Advocate General – I. None appeared on behalf of private respondents. It was submitted by Sri Arun Prasad Ambastha, Patna High Court CWJC No.11336 of 2006 (6) dt.22-03-2013 2 / 2 2 learned counsel for the petitioner that since the present dispute relates to a dispute under the provisions of Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy Act, 1947 and now for adjudication of such dispute, a proper forum, as Land Tribunal, has already been constituted under the provisions of Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’), this matter may be referred to the Land Tribunal. Accordingly, with the consent of parties, in view of provisions contained in Section 15 of the Act, the Registry is directed to transmit the record of the case to the Tribunal forthwith. Anay (Rakesh Kumar, J.)