IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9090 of 2010 1. PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR YADAV @ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR @ LALAN KUMAR 2. UPENDRA YADAV @ UPENDRA PRASAD YADAV. 3. SUMALA DEVI 4. PINKI DEVI @ PINKI KUMARI 5. BHOLA YADAV. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . 2 15.03.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he shall not be pressing the application so far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned as he shall surrender in the court below and apply for regular bail. Prayer is allowed so far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned. So far as petitioner nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 are concerned, it is submitted that they are father-in-law, mother-in-law, married nanad and husband of nanad. It is contended that the complaint incorporates general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks, let petitioner nos. 2 to 5 namely Upendra Yadav @ Upendra Prasad Yadav, Sumala Devi, Pinki Devi @ Pinki Kumari and Bhola Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Saharsa in connection with Complaint Case no. 136C/2009. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )