IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15141 of 2011 SURENDRA YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 24.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Initially, the informant filed complaint case on 24.11.2010 which was converted into Rahui (Wena) P.S. Case no. 29/2011. Allegedly, the petitioner took informant’s minor daughter and sold her to one Bindeshwar Yadav @ Chhakan Yadav. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the informant and the petitioner are full brothers and, as a matter of fact, the instant case has been filed after one month of the alleged occurrence. It is contended by him that prior to filing of the present case, the petitioner filed Rahui (Wena) P.S. Case no. 261/2010 against the family members of the informant and in retaliation of the aforesaid case, informant got this false case instituted. It is also pointed out by him that the victim girl was in love and she solemnized her marriage with one Bindeshwar Yadav @ Chhakan Yadav and presently, couple has been residing at Delhi. It is also contended by him that when the informant learnt his fault, he entered into compromise which is evident from annexure 3 of this petition. Considering the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Surendra Yadav, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in Rahui (Wena) P.S. Case 2 no. 29/2011. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)