IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 26TH JUNE 2009 / 5TH ASHADHA 1931 RP.No. 763 of 2008(B) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN CRP.864/2004 Dated 17/12/2004 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): REVIEW PETITIONER --------------------------------------- DR.N.RAVEENDRAN, SREERAGOM, CHATHANNOOR P.O., KOLLAM, FORMERLY PRINCIPAL, S.N.COLLEGE, CHENGANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.RAJU K.MATHEWS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. MANAGER, SREE NARAYANA COLLEGES, KOLLAM. 2. THE UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT & M.N. KRISHNAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------- C.M.Appl. No.543 of 2008 & R.P.No.763 of 2008 in C.R.P.No.864 of 2004 ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of June, 2009 ORDER Basant,J. C.M.Appl.No.543/08 is to condone the delay of 1275 days in filing a review petition. C.R.P.No.864/04 was disposed of by the Division Bench as per the order dated 17/12/2004. A review petition was filed subsequently and the same was dismissed by the same Bench as per the order dated 25/2/05 in R.P.No.28/05. Still later, the petitioner went before the Supreme Court and by Annexure-9 order, the Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition holding that the Supreme Court finds no reason to interfere with the facts recorded in the judgment of the High Court. R.P.No.763 of 2008 -: 2 :- 2. Thereafter, the present review petition has been filed along with this application to condone the long delay of 1275 days. 3. It is submitted that the delay occurred on account of a personal tragedy which the petitioner had to face. We are not satisfied that the said reason urged is sufficient to condone the long and inordinate delay of 1275 days in filing this review petition. In coming to this conclusion, we cannot lose sight of the fact that earlier a review petition had been filed and in that review petition or before the Bench when the C.R.P. was disposed of the points presently urged were not urged. In short, we find no reason to condone the long and inordinate delay in filing this review petition. The application for condonation of delay is hence dismissed. Consequently, the review petition shall stand rejected as barred by limitation. Sd/- R. BASANT (Judge) Sd/- M.N. KRISHNAN (Judge) Nan/ //true copy/ P.S. to Judge R.P.No.763 of 2008 -: 3 :-