1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Second Appeal No. 224 of 2009 [Smt. Tulsabai Rambhau Rajankar Vs. Bhikaji Pandurang Wankhede] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. G.G. Mishra, Adv., for the appellant. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI,J. DATE : 07th July, 2009. 1. Heard learned Adv. Mr. G.G. Mishra for the appellant. Perused the record. 2. It was a suit by the plaintiff- appellant seeking a declaration and perpetual injunction of ownership relating to right of use of way. 3. Fact finding that plaintiff has failed to prove right of way is not shown to be rendered without considering material on record, or any piece of evidence. The findings are also not shown to be perverse. 4. The Substantial Questions of Law, so described in the Memo of Appeal, do not arise. 2 5. In the circumstances, appeal has no merit, and is dismissed. Judge |Hedau| 3