a—wW,m,W 0% wfm) (y L1 W $HT$ 111200<zs WQI m (W) anémmm amenéam mm’mma WWW#%&W§R €5Wan€w v Fetitioner Satesmgh about as ASI, Versus Resgondents 1. Stats Home Raip 2. Direc (A51 Distt. 3. Direc Qualt 4. Supe ' Writ etition under Article 226 5.8. Hon’ble Shri Dhirendra Mi. 19.11 2008 8111i Jitendra Gupta, $1111 Ajay Dwivedi, Dy GA The petitioner by the the respondents to consitier his case for'promotion was not of Annexure P/ 1, P] 2 (‘35 P/3. that he submitted a representation name for promotion vide An representation, he was summoned Raipur vide order of Annexure decision has yet been taken on Negi, S/o Late B.S. Negi, Agmi 56 years, Postsd at Town Thana Durg, Rjo Mohau Nagar, Durg (CG) of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Dopartxnent, DKS Bhawali, Mantralaya, (CG) r Inspector Gonoral of Polico ’strau’ve) Police Head Quarter Raipur, Raipur (CG) r General of Police, Police Head 1* Raipur, Dist. Raipur (CG) tendent of Police, Distt. Durg'(CG) of the Constitution of India hra, J counsel for the petitioner. for the State. mam; petition is praying for dixection to case for promotion as the petitioner’s considered while passing promotion orders The further grievance 0:” the petitioner is against non—consideration of his nexure P/4 and on the basis of this f by the'WDirector General of Police, P/5 dated 14.11.2006. However, no his representation. m1 Eni$ wfor) 69Q‘b‘ “200 % mwW (W) gamma anéa 9/ anéa arrW aanmam WW§WW $W3né21 In View of above submis the instant petition is disposer fresh representation before grievances raised in tins peti toady. On such representation consider and decide the same t within a further period of eig} representation. Learnsd counsel for t pressing this petition. at this s fresh representation before Raipurlrespondent No.3 for I his promotion and the respon his representation within a sp‘ Shri Ajay Dwivedi, learn case the petitioner files a fr gn’evances before the respond: today, the same shall be con No.3 within a further period c the representation. he petitioner submits that he is not tage, however, he prays for liberty to Ele the General of Police, edressal of his grievances in relation to dent No. 3 be further directed to decide :cifled period. Director ed Dy. GA for the State submits that in ash representation for redressal of his :nt No.3 within a period ofone Week from sidered and decided by the respondent f eight weeks from the date of receipt of sions of learned counsel for the parties, i ofwith liberty to the petitioner to fiie a the respondent No.3 raising all his hon, within a, period of one week from being made, the respondent No. 3 shalt 3n its own merits in accordance with law 1t weeks from the date of receipt of the Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ,_\ X5 i‘x