IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1934 of 2010 (M/S) Sri Sai Education Institution Neel Kanth Urja Centre, Bhutpuri Road, Nadehi, Jaspur, District Udham Singh Nagar … Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ……… Respondents. Mr. S.K. Mandal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Shah, Standing Counsel for the respondent/State. Mr. Abhishek Verma, holding brief of Mr. Sudhir Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. (Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J.) Heard Mr. S.K. Mandal, Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. N.P. Shah, Standing Counsel for State and Mr. Abhishek Verma, holding brief of Mr. Sudhir Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. By means of this petition the petitioner has sought the writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to decide the appeal pending before the respondent No.2, to constitute the inspection committee and inspect the institution for running the B.Ed. classless within a stipulated period for the present session. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner has submitted that the petitioner moved application for grant of recognition for running the classes of B.Ed. and completed all formalities. The respondent No.3 illegally closed the application of the petitioner on 14.5.2010, against which an appeal has been preferred before respondent no.2 and the same has been registered as appeal no. 89-768/2010, which is still pending. Session 2010-2011 is going on and due to non-disposal of appeal the petitioner is suffering great loss. Therefore, the respondents may be directed to decide the appeal of the petitioner at the earliest. Prayer made is innocuous. 2 The respondent no.2 is directed to decide the appeal of the petitioner, which is pending before him, expeditiously, preferably within four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. Dated: 18-11-2010 (B.S. Verma, J. ) ISB