IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2008 / 11TH CHAITHRA 1930 SA.No. 714 of 1996() -------------------- AS.46/1993 of SUB COURT, KASARAGOD OS.357/1985 of PRL.MUNSIFF, KASARAGOD .................... APPELLANT-APPELLANT-DEFENDANT: --------------------------------------------- K.UNHAKKE, W/o.K.KRISHNA RAI RESIDING IN KALLAKALAYA OF PERDALA VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, P.O.PERDALA. BY ADV. SMT.SUMATHI DANDAPANI RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS-PLAINTIFFS: --------------------------------------------------- 1. ABDULLAKUNHI, S/o. BAPUNHI RESIDING IN ADAKKAD OF PERDALA VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, P.O. PERDALA. 2. ABDULLA, S/o. SHEIK MUHAMMED, RESIDING IN ADAKKAD OF PERDALA VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, P.O. PERDALA. 3. MOHAMMAD, S/o. ABDULLA, RESIDING IN KANYANA OF PERDALA VILLAGE AND POST, KASARAGOD TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.SREEKRISHNAN, PARVATHI A.MENON SRI.M.C.SEN SRI.SHAHNA KARTHIKEYAN SRI.S.PRAKASH THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.A.714/1996 2 ORDER ON C.M.P.No.1519/1996 IN S.A.No.714/1996 DISMISSED 31/3/2008 Sd/- K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE K.T.SANKARAN,J ==================== S.A.No.714 of 1996 ======================== Dated this the 31st day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT It is submitted by the counsel for the appellant that the dispute between the parties has been settled out of court and that it is not necessary to prosecute the second appeal. The second appeal is therefore dismissed as settled out of court. K.T.SANKARAN,JUDGE dvs