IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.79 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1682 OF 2008(D). (SMT.PUSHPALATA WD/O. DEVAKINANDAN JAISWAL & OTH. Vs. JAIKUMAR PARMESHWARLALJI JAISWAL & OTH.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Shri L.H.Kothari, Advocate for Appellants. Shri A.C.Dharmadhikari, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mrs. Bharti Dangre, Addl. G.P. for Respondents No.2, 3 & 4. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 05, 2009. 1. Heard. 2. Perused order passed by the learned Single Judge, which is under challenge. 3. In the midst of hearing the learned Advocate for the appellants, on instructions, states that in view that the order passed by the learned Single Judge is based on non-observance of the principles of natural justice and all other points have not been adjudicated, he would like to withdraw the appeal and seek liberty to raise whatever points available to the appellants in the proceedings which are going on. 4. Reserving the liberty to re-agitated the points, which are not adjudicated, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. 5. The Revisional Authority is directed to decide the case as far as possible within three months from the date of receipt of writ of this Court. JUDGE JUDGE RR.