.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1199 OF 2006 Shekar Narayan Shetty ...Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr.Bhavesh Pawar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms.I. Calcuttawala, A.G.P., for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : JUNE 14, 2006. JUNE 14, 2006. JUNE 14, 2006. P.C.: . The apprehension of the petitioner is that respondent Nos.1 & 2 may evict him without following due process of law. The law is settled that public authority before evicting a person must follow the due process. Insofar as the apprehension of the petitioner about respondent No.3, who is a private party, is concerned it is open for the petitioner to take such steps as permissible in law and to which he is entitled to. With the above observations, the Petition stands disposed of. [F.I.REBELLO,J.] .[2]. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]