2211ba616.11.odt 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO. 616 OF 2011 (Arun Govind Dongarwar Vs. State of Maharashtra) WITH CRMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO. 651 OF 2011 (Chandrakant s/o Ratanlal Kawale Vs. State of Maharashtra) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - S/Shri S. K. Kotwal & V. D. Muley, Advocates for the applicants. Mr. S. S. Doifode, A.P.P. for Respondent-State. CORAM : M.N. GILANI, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 22, 2011. Both these applications are arising out of Crime No. 166/2011 registered with Police Station Gondia (City) for the offence punishable under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Sangita, aged about 30 years, daughter of retired Forest Guard, holding B.A. Degree, was in need of the job. Therefore, her father approached Sunanda who is original accused No.1. She also happens to be in relation with Sangita. Sunanda (accused No.1) promised Sangita and her father that she would arrange to get her appointed as Talathi and for that Rs.4,00,000/- were accepted. In turn, accused No.1 Sunanda approached accused No.4 Chandrakant and thereafter Chandrakant 2211ba616.11.odt 2/2 approached accused No.5 Arun. The job could not be arranged. Since the promise was not fulfilled, Shriram, father of Sangita lodged the F.I.R. The investigation is over. Accused Chandrakant and Arun are in jail. Accused No.1 Sunanda, who initially had promised Sangita that latter would be appointed as Talathi, has already been released on bail. There are no special circumstances to deny bail to the present applicants. In the result, both the applications are allowed. Both the applicants, viz. (i) Arun Govind Dongarwar; and (ii) Chandrakant Ratanlal Kawale be released on bail on their executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty-five thousand only) each with two sureties each in the like amount. JUDGE wwl