IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID MONDAY, THE 7TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 18TH MAGHA 1932 SA.No. 139 of 2001() -------------------- AS.239/1997 of DISTRICT COURT, TRIVANDRUM OS.368/1983 of ADDL.MUNSIFF (RENT CONTROL COURT)COURT,TRIVANDRUM .................... APPELLANTS:- (APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS 2 & 3) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. KUNJI BHAGEERATHI, PUTHUVALVILA PUTHEN VEEDU AYROORPARA MURI, AYROORPARA VILLAGE TRIVANDRUM 2. BHAGEERATHI LALITHA DO..... DO.... BY ADV. SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH RESPONDENTS:- (RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS & 1ST DEFENDANT) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PACHI AMMA PONNAMMA MANNARAPOIKAYIL, PUTHEN VEEDU UTHIYARAMOOLA MURI AYROORPARA VILLAGE, TRIVANDRUM 2. MADHAVAN PILLAI RAJAN, DO...DO... 3. MADHAVAN PILLAI VIJAYAN, DO... DO... 4. MADHAVAN PILLAI SANTHAKUMAR, DO..DO.. 5. PONNAMMA LALITHA BAI, DO... DO... 6. MADHAVAN PILLAI KRISHNAN NAIR, DO... DO... *7. KESAVAN BALAKRISHNAN, PUTHUVALVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, AYROORPARA MURI, AYROORPARA VILLAGE, TRIVANDRUM (EXPIRED) * 7 th RESPONDENT IS DELETED FROM THE PARTY ARRAY AS PER ORDER DATED 07.02.2011 IN I.A.NO.395/2011. ADV. SRI.L.MOHANAN FOR R1 TO R6 THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: dmb SA.No. 139 of 2001 ORDER IN C.M.P.NO.820/2001 IN S.A.NO.139/2001 DISMISSED Sd/- 07.02.2011 HARUN-UL-RASHID //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------------------- S.A.NO.139 of 2001 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T The defendants 2 and 3 in O.S.No.368/1983 of the Additional Munsiff (Rent Control Court) Court, Trivandrum are the appellants. Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.239/1997 on the file of the District Court, Trivandrum. The trial Court passed the preliminary decree and lower appellate court confirmed the decree and judgment. 2. During the pendency of the second appeal, the parties settled the disputes between them. They filed a joint petition under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC requesting this court to pass decree in terms of the compromise. 3. The terms agreed between the parties are recited in the joint petition. The terms of the compromise is recorded. The decree in terms of compromise is passed. The appeal is disposed of in terms of compromise. HARUN-UL-RASHID JUDGE dmb