IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. SUIT No.2769 of 2005. Vikasco Rubber Products (India) & Ors. ... Plaintiffs. Versus. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. ... .........Defendants. Mr. M. B. Rathod i/b D.M. Harish & Co. for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Sanjay Udeshi, Advocate for the Defendants. CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATE DATE DATE : 21st June, 2006. : 21st June, 2006. : 21st June, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1] The consent terms signed by the parties and their Advocates are taken on record and marked "X"for identification. 2] The disputes are settled inasmuch as a third party has made all payments on behalf of the plaintiffs to the defendants and the defendants have, therefore, discharged the plaintiffs from all obligations under the respective agreements including the mortgage deed. Therefore, it is agreed that the suit itself would stand disposed of in terms of these consent terms. 3] All interim orders stand vacated. - 2 2 2 - 4] It is further agreed that certain summary suit and proceedings therein would also come to an end by these terms. 5 Order in terms of consent terms. Needless to state that court fee would be refunded as per rules. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J)J)J)