IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 329 of 2010 Dhiraj Sukhdeoraoji Bobde Versus Ganesh Hemraj Barange and 2 others. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Y.V. Nayyar, counsel for applicant. CORAM:- A.B. Chaudhari, J. DATED :- 3 rd March ,2010 Heard Mr.Y.V. Nayyar for the applicant. An order was passed by the trial court allowing the complainant to examine the witnesses in addition to him which is under challenge in the present application. Mr. Nayyar vehemently argued that the trial court ought to have considered that this application was made to fill up the lacunae in the case of the complainant. I find that the order is as per judicial discretion and that apart the complainant is entitled to bring as many witnesses as per his choice which are relevant in the case and the discretion exercised by the court below for allowing him to examine the witnesses in addition to him cannot be faulted. The applicant is entitled to cross-examine the witnesses after they are produced in the witness box. In the result, I find no merits in the present application. It stands dismissed. JUDGE Hirekhan