IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7196 of 2008 ***** Dilip Kumar, Son of Naresh Rai, resident of village- Garahchak, Kirpal Tola, P.S. Fatuha, District-Patna. …. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar …. …. Opposite party ----------- 2. 16.4.2009. Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved because his petition for recall of a witness for cross-examination has been rejected by the F.T.C. V, Patna on 4.1.2008. Submission made at the Bar is that the petitioner has a right under Section 311 of the Cr.P.C. to ask for recall of a witness in the interest of justice but there is nothing stated in the petition which can show that a bonafide prayer has been made on substantive ground in the interest of justice. On a perusal of the order dated 4.1.2008 as well as on hearing the submission made in this regard the Court is not satisfied that the Court below has committed any patent illegality or error which requires interference under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. The application is dismissed. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)