C.R.No.4481 of 2009(O&M) #1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.4481 of 2009(O&M) Date of Order: 3.3.2011 Haryana Wakf Board .....Petitioner Vs. Prabhu Dayal .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr. Sandeep Punchhi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. N.S. Swaitch, Advocate for the applicant (in C.M. No.16715-CII of 2010). JASWANT SINGH, J (ORAL) C.M.No.16715-CII of 2010 Applicant-Kaku Husain has filed the present application under Order 22 Rule 10 and Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 CPC for impleadment being interested person in the property in dispute on account of being subsequently allotted the land in dispute. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the applicant does not press this application. Dismissed as not pressed. C.R.No.4481 of 2009 Wakf. Board, Haryana has filed the present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution assailing the judgment dated 1.5.2009 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Yamuna Nagar exercising C.R.No.4481 of 2009(O&M) #2# the powers of the Tribunal under Section 83(2) of the Wakf. Act 1995 whereby the petition of the Wakf. Board for possession of the land in dispute and for recovery of the arrears of lease money together with mesne profit from the respondent-Prabhu Ram has been dismissed. At the time of arguments, learned counsel for the parties are agreed that in view of the recent judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in Civil Appeal No.1182 of 2006 titled as Ramesh Gobindram (dead) through Lrs v. Sugra Humayun Mirza Wakf, learned Tribunal did not have the jurisdiction to proceed in the matter. Learned counsel for the respondent further states that they have no objection if the present orders are set aside with the direction to the petitioners to approach the learned Civil Civil/appropriate court to seek their appropriate remedy in accordance with law. In view of the agreed stand that the learned Tribunal did not have the jurisdiction, the present petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside with permission to the petitioner-Wakf. Board to seek their remedy in accordance with law before the appropriate forum. March 03, 2011 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manoj JUDGE