IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3132 of 2009. Decided on: March 9, 2010 Joginder Singh ….. Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the petitioner : Mrs. Devyani Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. R.R. Rahi, Advocate for respondent No.3. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner approached this Court, aggrieved by his transfer from the present station as per Annexure P-3. According to the petitioner, after completion of one year of service, he has been transferred from the present station. The contesting respondent, however, submits that the petitioner has been somewhere around the place of his choice for the last more than seven years. It is also submitted that the contesting respondent is physically handcapped person and for the last seven years the said respondent has not obtained the place near to his residence. It is also 2 submitted that only based on a proper representation, the said respondent has been transferred to the present place. There are other contentions of the parties as well. The State has filed reply defending the action already taken by them in transferring the petitioner. Though the parties have argued the matter for quite some-time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in any event, in case there are vacancies available in some of the places which could be pointed out by the petitioner and in case the petitioner could be accommodated in any one of the places without affecting the interest of anybody else, the petitioner will be satisfied. Therefore, the petitioner prays for liberty to make representation before the second respondent. The Writ Petition is disposed of as follows. In the event of the petitioner filing an appropriate representation within a week from today, the matter will be considered by the second respondent and in case the petitioner can be accommodated at any of the places pointed out by the petitioner, to the extent possible, the second respondent shall take steps to accommodate the petitioner in that place. Orders in that regard shall be passed, in any case, within another two weeks. In the said three weeks, interim order order 4th September, 2009 passed by this Court shall continue. The Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications. Dasti copy on usual terms. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 9, 2010 (Justice R.B. Misra), (rks) Judge.