1 Cri.Application No.4008 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4008 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra ..APPLICANT VERSUS Gajanan Pandurang Chipulwar & ors. ..RESPONDENTS Mr K.G. Patil, A.P.P. for the applicant; Mr G.P. Shinde, Advocate for respondents no.1 to 4. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE : 3rd March, 2011 PER COURT : By this application the applicant - State seeks leave to file appeal against the judgment of the Extra Joint Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nanded, dated 20.5.2010, in Sessions Case No.49 of 2008, acquitting respondents no.2 to 5 for offences punishable under section 304-B, 323, 506 and 498-A of the Indian Penal Code. At the outset, the learned A.P.P. states that this appeal is restricted to the prayer for grant of leave to file appeal against respondents for offence punishable under section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code only. 2 Cri.Application No.4008 of 2010 2. We have heard the learned A.P.P. for the applicant and we have also perused the record and proceedings. The prosecution had examined P.W.2 Prakash Ratanwar, father of deceased Manjusha, who is alleged to have committed suicide by consumption of poison. We have minutely scrutinized the evidence of P.W.2 Prakash and upon perusal of the evidence, it is apparent to us that direct allegations have been levelled against the husband i.e. original accused no.1 while vague and omnibus allegations of illtreatment have been made against the other relatives i.e. original accused nos.2 to 5. The Trial Court has given these respondents the benefit of doubt and has acquitted them. 3. Upon perusal of the record and proceedings, we do not find any ground for taking a view different than the view taken by the Trial Court, which appears to be a possible view to be taken on the basis of the evidence on record. 4. In that light of the matter, this application is dismissed. Leave refused. (A.V. POTDAR, J.) ( P.V. HARDAS, J.) amj/criap4008.10