..^..^1 t IfilE £, IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) W.P, (S) No. -7^7fc /2010 PETITIONER ,.-.-"' OVS^:5^~^ ^....^::-'?S^SS€..- ^ic^\R\/^V^-a-n<">B' ^.^^y^;^\.^^'"" Amritlal Dhruv, S/o. Shri Som Say Dhruv, aged about 41 years, R/o. Mukam- Gahnasiyar & Post- Khakhra, Tahsil - Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS (1) State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretaiy, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division (Samanya), Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) (3) Depot Officer, office of Depot Officer (forest), Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 3:n^i1^T r^jch sni^r ^IW^rf^T 3^-^Tm^f, •^OT^, 1^iwy 3^?i?r 'q^i^ ^c ^RTWII ^b^l<^.V6:.M$>..|-(.°-.^^:10 200 •^r^r' 3RT^T ^<H^R'HS^ S.B.: HON?BLE JUBTICB MR. P: le-12-2010: tliough he is entiUed for his regulaj Guard, he has been regiilarized on Shri Kale subraits that the ^mf^ft^-HTR^f ^ fe^'tf^^ ^3^<R3TI^T SHKER DSWAKSR Shri. S.P,Kale, couiisel for th^ petitioner, Shri Sauta Ghai, P.L. for thei Grievance of the petitioner i|3. the presexit petitiou is th.at Ization on tlie post of Forest 1'he post. ofwatchjnaa, peti.ti.QB.er has iiot filed any such regulariza.tion order on the p4^t of Watchxaaii but tlie fact rem.aias that fhe reguladzation. oixl^r has already beea. passed,, Counsel for the petitioner sitbniits th.at tlie respon.d.ents have conipleted all the foi'mali.ti.es f4r passing necessary ordcr m, favour ofthe petitioner aad flierefoi|e at this.stage tli.e petitioner [inay be pesiixitted. to withdraw the |to fllfe a fresh representation befoi] Isaiae Biav be directed to be decide^ |expeditiously as possible, present- petition witlx liberty respondent No.2 and ihe 1. ia accordance wi.th law as 1 Counsel for the State submitjs that without ascertairiiiig pie fa.et he cannot raak.e any st^teiae.B.t whethcr th..e State Ipie services of tls.e petitioner jnot. However, he has no representation before the poveninient is wiUiag to regiilaiize Ipn the post of Forest Giiard or ^bjectioii tf tlie petitioner makes ; ^.utlionty concei'D..ed sjid fhe sajiaie is decided by it ia. ^ccordance with. law. [^'^fe^ ?XI-HC-22 ^^T °?qTqi^f, ^-dly^^, 'f^TRTy ^^ ^S^K ^lN^St ^tjjeb^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ ^^ •^F^' " 3S ^TT^T'^T hv\\^ ^Ti^T 5f)^ICb 'yf^a 37T^T ^^TT^R ^f^ —2r" <=hl^td4l^ W^ ^ ft^ <Fal^i< ^^Tf^Rsni^T Accordinigly, the petition is c| that in the event of any representt before respoudent No,2 raisiog expected to be decided by fli| accordaiice wi.th law as expeditiouslj; apresent^.tion hlis isposed of wifh a dn'ection filed by the petitioner grievaiices, the sanie is a.ufhorily co.ucemed in. as possible. It is made clear that this C( 1.0piriion on. nierits of the case |would be a.t Mberty to' deci.de tlie [strictly in. a.ccord.aace witli law after Iposition a^id the statemeiit inade a.t »urt lias not expressed any tiie autlioiity concemed' of tlie petiticjner veriiyiiig the correct facta.al tlie bar. arjd re^resenta.tion Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge [^•^feA