BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIsGARH AT BILASPUR ‘ w.P (S) No. €z§§ of 2010 / Devendra Kumar Shukla, Advocate, S/o Radheshyam Shukla, aged about 33 years, R/o Jorapara, . Bilaspur, District-BHaspur (C.G.), VERSUS PETITIONER / RESPONDENTS :1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : the Secretary, Labour Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ('2. 2./w Secretary, State of Chhattisgarh, Labour Department, Raipur (C.G.) 3.“{Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, through its Secretary, Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Shankar Nagar Road, Raipur (C.G.) Nilesh Kumar Pandey, selected for the post of Presiding Officer, Labour Court, R/o 27 Kholi, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA \NKgNasKS/Io REV 200 WW amtm (W2) WWW WW§WW %aimané¥r S.B: HON’BIE JUSTICE MR, i’RiTiNKER QEWAKER MAG-EMQ: Shri Geutam Khe’uapai, munsei far the pe’iiimnet Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan; PL for We State. Heard 0n LA‘ N0. 2, which is an appimafion for withdrawa? 02‘ writ petiiian. Fer the reasons mentioxed in the app§icaticn, the same is a!§ewed. Pemioner is permitted t0 wiathdrawn *he preeem", wri: petitbn Accordingiy, the wrii pew‘ an §s dismiesed as withdrawn ; Sd/- f ‘inz'? Pritinker Diwaker Judge