S.B. CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.170/2008 Smt. Soshina Bano Vs. Shrimati Parmeshwari Devi. Date of order : 18th July, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. Dinesh Mehta for the petitioner. --------- 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 1.9.2007 whereby the learned trial court rejected the application of the defendant under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. The said application was filed with the averment that averments made in the plaint about the third child born to the defendant in an election petition were vague and did not disclose the cause of action. 3. Having perused the impugned order and after hearing learned counsel, this Court is of the opinion that it is a matter of evidence and averments made in the plaint prima facie do not amount to non-disclosure of any cause of action. The learned trial court cannot be held unjustified in rejecting the said application. 4. The revision petition is devoid of merit. The same is accordingly dismissed. [ DR. VINEET KOTHARI ], J. item No.23 babulal/-