IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Crl. Writ Petition No. 291 of 2008 1. Sanju Lal S/o Chaman Lal 2. Telu Ram S/o Chaman Lal Both R/o Village Salimar, Salhapur, P.S. Gangnahar Roorkee, District Haridwar. [ . Petitioners ...………… [ Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Sr. Superintendent of Police, District Haridwar. 2. Station House Officer P.S. Gangnahar, District Haridwar. 3. Mange Ram S/o Molhar Singh R/o Saliyar (Salhapur) P.S. Gangnahar Roorkee, Distt. Haridwar. ...…………. Respondents Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the State. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2) By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought quashing of the first information report dated 04.04.2008, registered as Crime No. 79 of 2008, relating to offences punishable under Section 363, 366 of I.P.C., with Police Station Gangnahar Roorkee, District Haridwar. 3) Learned counsel for the petitioners argued that petitioner No. 1 is married to the daughter of the complainant (respondent No. 3). It is further contended that the girl is major. 4) Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Government Advocate and after going through the papers on record, we are not inclined to interfere with the investigation, in the matter. 5) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in limine with the observation that if the petitioners are arrested or surrender before the court concerned, their bail application shall be heard and disposed of, without unreasonable delay. (Stay Application No. 2073 of 2008 also stands dismissed, accordingly). (Dharam Veer, J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 24.04.2008 24.04.2008 H.Negi