IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.404 of 2010 ASHOK YADAV SON OF RAJI YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BISHANPUR, P.S. SAHARGHAT , DISTRICT MADHUBANI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR . 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE DARBHANGA RANGE. 4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MADHUBANI. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BENIPATTI, DISTRICT – MADHUBANI 6. THE OFFICER INCHARGE SAHARGHAT, POLICE STATION, DISTRICT MADHUBANI. ----------- 02. 04.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The prayer of the petitioner is that the investigation of Saharghat P.S. Case No. 9 of 2010 be completed in the proper manner and conclude the same at its logical end. Learned counsel for the State submits that the police is properly investigating the case. Moreso, the petitioner has already filed a petition before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani as contained in Annexure- 2 with the prayer that the informant be heard in this case. As the final form is submitted by the police, at this stage no interference is called for. Considering the submission of the parties, it 2 appears that the investigation is still continuing and petitioner has already filed a petition as contained in Annexure- 2, as mentioned above. In view of the above, I am not inclined to interfere into the matter and the writ application is accordingly dismissed. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)