IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC(T) No. 382 of 2008 Decided on: 28.10.2010 Sh. Balkhu Ram …Petitioner. Versus Shri Balram Sharma and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Vishwa Bushan, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed having become infructuous. 2. However, it is made clear that the judgment dated 12.10.2007 shall abide by the outcome of the Special Leave Petition. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 28, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?