IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 16TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 27TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 4838 of 2010(D) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. GOPI.V.K, GOLD SMITH, VADANAPALLY HOUSE, VADANAPALLY VILLAGE, VADANAPALLY.P.O, TRICHUR. 2. BOSE.V.S, S/O.SREEDHARAN, VADANAPALLY HOUSE, VADANAPALLY VILLAGE, VADANAPALLY.P.O, TRICHUR. 3. PRADAD.V.N, S/O.NARAYANAN, VAIKKATTIL HOUSE, VADANAPALLY, TRICHUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, G5 & 6, SECTOR 10, DWARAKA, NEW DELHI-57. 2. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THUSHARA BINHDHU, NARICODE 337, CHANDRANAGAR, PALAKKAD. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TRICHUR DISTRICT, TRICHUR. 4. SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LA), SLAO, O/O SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LA), N.H.17 KUTTIPURAM-EDAPALLY, KODUNGALLOOR, TRICHUR DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. K.R. DEEPA SC FOR R1 SRI. THOMAS ANTONY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.4838 OF 2010 (D) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T Challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P10 order passed by the 4th respondent, overruling the objection raised by the petitioner against the acquisition for the purpose of widening of the bye pass at Vadanapally area. Since Ext.P9 notification has been published under Section 3-A of the National Highways Act, if at all the petitioners are aggrieved by the acquisition it is up to the petitioners to raise their objections and it is for the authorities to deal with the same. 2. Having regarding the above, I do not think it necessary for this court to go into the contentions raised against Ext.P10. Therefore, the writ petition is closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue their objections, which according to them has been filed on 2.2.2010, against Ext.P9 notification. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :