IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2010 / 19TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 11619 of 2010(B) ------------------------------------ ID.1/2005 of C.GOVT.LABOUR COURT,ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- CHRISTOPHER P.P PANJIKKARAN HOUSE, NEAR EAST CHURCH ,ANGAMLAY P.O. BY ADV. SRI.PAULSON C.VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. REGIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER (CENTRAL) KENDIRIYA SHRAM SADAN, KAKKANAD, KOCHI-30 2. ASST.GENERAL MANAGER BANK OF BARODA, REGIONAL OFFICE KARIAMPANAL ARCADE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695023. R1 BY ADV. SMT.MINI R.MENON, ADDL.CGSC R2 BY ADV. SRI. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, SRI.K.ANAND, SMT.LATHA KRISHNAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO.11619/2010- B APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE AWARD DT.18/6/2009 PASSED BY CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. P2 COPY OF THE NOTICE DT. 14/07/2009 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE SECOND RESPONDENT. P3 COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 14/8/2009 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE SECOND RESPONDENT. P4 COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 22/10/2009 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE SECOND RESPONDENT. P5 COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 08/02/2010 TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT LABOUR COMMISSIONER BY THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No.11619 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 11th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T This writ petition has been filed by the workman in I.D No.1/2005 seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the labour Court to initiate prosecution proceedings against the second respondent bank for failure to implement Ext.P1 award. Admittedly, the implementation of the said award has been stayed by this Court in WP(C) No.3171/2010, filed by the second respondent bank. Accordingly, the prayer in this writ petition cannot be considered at this stage on account of the said order in WP(C) No.3171/2010. However, it is made clear that it will be open to the petitioner to move the matter afresh subject to the decision in WP(C) No.3171/2010. This Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge