IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36662 of 2008 AMRIT YADAV, Son of Lakha Yadav, Resident of Village- Somiya, Police Station- Barachatti, District- Gaya :------------Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR:-----------Opposite Party ----------- For the Petitioner :Mr. Tej Narayan Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwari, A.P.P. ======== 3. 23.10.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 395 of the Penal Code and has been implicated in this case on the basis of the confessional statement of Lal Deo Yadav, who has been admitted to the privilege of bail by another Bench of this Court under orders dated 22.07.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 22696 of 2008. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is nothing to distinguish his case with that of Lal Deo Yadav which submission is not correct as besides the present case petitioner is accused in two other cases of 395 I.P.C. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. His prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected with liberty to renew after completing one year in jail custody. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)