1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10681 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION ST. NO.5317 OF 2010 Trimbak s/o Ganpatrao Khapekar ..APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Mah & ors. ..RESPONDENTS Mr S.R. Barlinge, Advocate for the applicant; Mr S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for respondent no.1. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND N.D. DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE : 5th August, 2010 PER COURT : By this application the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 40 days in filing an application seeking restoration of the writ petition as also restoration of the writ petition. We have heard Shri S.R. Barlinge, learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.P. on behalf of respondent no. 1. Since no notice had been issued to the other respondents in the writ petition, we do not consider it necessary to issue notice to the other respondents. For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed and delay is condoned. 2. It appears that the writ petition came to be dismissed on account of the conditional order which was passed regarding dismissal of the petition in the event objections were not removed. We re-call the aforesaid order 2 and restore the petition to file on the condition that the petitioner removes all office objections within two weeks from today. Civil Application allowed accordingly. No order as to costs. (N.D. DESHPANDE, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) amj/ca10681.10