IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 22ND MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 22674 of 2003(Y) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- L.SYAMALA KUMARI, RETIRED H.S.A., R.V.SM.H.S.PRAYAR RESIDING AT “ROHINI” KRISHNAPURAM P.O., KAYAMKULAM. BY ADVS. SRI.R.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI SRI.M.J.JOHN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ALAPPUZHA. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.M.R.SREELATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs WP(C).No. 22674/2003(Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.P.NO.16515/93 DATED 11/06/1998 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. P2: COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 09/07/2003. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE svs T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 22674 of 2003--Y - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 11th day of February, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner approached this Court challenging Ext.P2, copy of the notice issued to two persons mentioned therein. 2. The petitioner retired from service on 31.3.1991. Pursuant to the judgment of this Court in O.P. No.16515/1993 which was disposed of by this Court as per Ext.P1, the DCRG was paid to the petitioner along with interest. According to the petitioner, again she was asked to appear for a personal hearing for fixing the liability. According to her, it was unnecessary for the petitioner to be given notice for the enquiry. 2. Learned Govt. Pleader submitted that the Government has to fix the liability towards the interest paid which is is sought to be recovered from the officers responsible and in connection with the said enquiry, the petitioner was issued with a notice. No action was proposed against the petitioner. In the light of the above, there is nothing to interfere with Ext.P2. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of recording the above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) 2 kav/