Civil Revision No. 2980 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2980 of 2011 Date of Decision: 5.5.2011 *** Bhupinder Pal Singh .. Petitioner Vs. Gurnam Singh .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. Abhishek Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. By dint of impugned order dated 6.1.2011, the application of the petitioner-plaintiff for leading additional evidence, has been dismissed. Heard. It is evident from the perusal of the impugned order that the evidence of the petitioner was closed by an order of the Court dated 11.11.2009. When the case was at the stage of defendant's evidence, he filed the impugned application, obviously, to wriggle out order dated 11.11.2009 vide which his evidence was closed by the Court by adopting coercive method. There is no illegality or perversity in the impugned order. The petition, being without any merit, is dismissed in limine. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE May 05, 2011 Jiten