^^^^ irfi^S^-. ^ ' j?S •!?" &S ftR-' ptesenw c ^.^ INTHEHIGHCOURTOKCHHA'mSGARHATBIIASPUR WRIT PETTnQN NO^h9o^—/26Q5 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS :- / SheetalDas S/o Late Shri &K. Das, aged about 34 years, R/o Sindltiya Nagar, Durg, District Durg [C.G.]. VERSUS :- /^l] State of ' Chhattisgarh,. thrbugh Seeretary, ^Revenue Departinent, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.J. ; _ 2] Under . Secretaiy Revenue Department, of D.K.S. Bhasan, Raipur [C.G.]| /^ 3] Sub-Divisipnal " . j QffiGer,. [Revenue] Durg, District Durg [C,G.]. . 1;., ...•.• WBJ^I'ETiaSOK'O'NDERAR'TICI.E 226/227 QFTHE % eONS'nTUTIONOFlNDIA m ];irvrn:ffi]- T~T HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISOARHAT BILASPUR SiNGLEBENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATSSH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. Petitioner ResBpndente WRIT PETITiON N0.4904 OF Sheetat Das versus State ofChhattisgarh and others Present : Mr.T.K.Tiwari.counsetforthepetitioner. Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Pansl Lawyer for the OROER (Passed on 27*hDayofFebruary, 2007) Gopai l!.,i The petitioner while working as Patwari at Patwari Halka No.18, Pulgaon has been transferred to Patwari Halka No.13, Jamui, vide order dated 20-09-2005 (P-3). The petitioner challenges the validity of the impugned transfer order dated 20-09-2005 (P-3). 2. ThisCourt, videinterim orderdated 05-10-2015, directed that the impugned order dated 20-09-2005 (P-3) in respect of the petitioner be not glven effect to, till the next date of hearing. 3. With the passage of time, the writ petition has become infructuous, to which learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents has no objeGtion. 4. Thus, the writ petition is dismissed as having become Infructuous. No orderas to eosts. Sd/- SatishK.^nihotri Jud^e r-J !:;i!'rtT^-|I)frtiiii-;rrs—n^R^^T?s