A\y i»< HISH COURT OF CHHArTiSOARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition (Sl No. 625 of 2008 Petitioners 1) Pyare Lal Kashyap, Aged 40 years, S/o. Shri Ganga Prasad, AssistantTeacher, Govt. Primary School, Samund-Bara, Btook Saja, Distt. Durg. 2) Smt. Kiran Mishra, Aged 40 years, W/o. Shri N.N. Mishra, Lecturer, Govt. Girls HigherSec. School, Dongargaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG). Versus Responderts 1) The State Government of Chhatti^arh, through the Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(CG). 2) The District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon 3) The District Education Otfioer, Durg (CG). 4) Director of Pubiic Instruction, Ralpur (CG). pWrit Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) SB: Hbn'bte Mr. SaUsh K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Binu Sharma, Pane] Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed6n13th February, 2008) Learned oounsel appearing for the petittoners as well as for the State/responderts jointly submit that the fact and questlon of law involved in ttie present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwaht Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another p008 (!i) MP.iR •CG 96}, whioh has been disposed of vide order dated 3-4-2006. Learned counset appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. 2) Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in tfte case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitk3ners have aoquired B.Ed. Examination Certifcateonthelr own expenses asper the ciroulars dated 24-12-1998 and further whether they have been paid two advance tneremerts ornot. Noorder asto costs. r~—•—', Satish K. Asnihotri 1 -^s_. Judge -I