IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37527 of 2011 Ganesh Paswan Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2/ 23.11.2011 Heard. Considering the confinement of the petitioner since 11.1.2007 and further considering that the trial has not taken off on account of non-examination of any witness and further that efforts of the police on production of witnesses are insufficient, this Court feels it could be simply harsher as regards the personal liberties of the petitioner and the theory of innocence to further confine the petitioner, let petitioner Ganesh Paswan, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, FTC V, Patna in S.T. No. 369 of 2008 with the following conditions: 1. The petitioner shall attend the court on all dates, even if there was no purpose for that; 2. In case the petitioner has any reason for non- attendance of the court proceedings, those reasons must be brought satisfactorily into the notice of the trial judge and then only his representation could be allowed; 3. One of the sureties must be his family member and other his close relative and both of them should 2 present their identity proofs before the learned trial judge; 4. Any attempt brought satisfactorily into the notice of the trial judge, which may indicate that the petitioner was tampering with the prosecution evidence, the court below shall deem it sufficient to cancel the bond of the petitioner and further to take appropriate steps for his arrest and remand him to custody. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)