1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.172 OF 1996 Shri.Bartholomew Quinny. ...Plaintiff. vs. M/s.Ankur Constructions & others. ...Defendants. AND SUIT NO.176 OF 1996 Ronald Cawsin Quinny. ...Plaintiff vs. M/s.Ralhan Developers & others. ...Defendants AND SUIT NO. 198 OF 1996 Philip Quinny ...Plaintiff vs. M/s.Ankur Constructions & others. ...Defendants AND SUIT NO.199 OF 1996 John Lawrence Quinny ...Plaintiff vs. M/s.Ankur Constructions & others. ...Defendants. --- 2 Mr.Jose George, for Plaintiff. Mr.Riyan D'Souza i/b. Vivek Kumar Mourya, for Defendant no.10. CORAM: A.S. AGUIAR, J. DATED: 13th September,2005 P.C.:- 1. By consent the amendment is allowed as per the draft amendment handed in and signed by the parties. The amendment be carried out forthwith. The learned Advocates for parties including the newly added defendant no.10 states that the parties have settled the dispute and file the consent terms signed by the parties and their respective Advocates. All the parties including the representative of defendant no.10 are present in the Court and agree that the consent terms have been signed by them. The consent terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. 2. Decree in terms of consent terms. The undertakings in paragraph no.3 are accepted. No order as to costs. Refund of Court fees as per rules. The suits are disposed of . ---