IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 1874 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 2.4.2009 Kailasho Devi ....Petitioner Versus Shamsher Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. S.S. Godara, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL J **** The challenge in the present petition is to the order dated February 26, 2009, passed by the learned Court below whereby the petitioner has been directed to give her thumb impression for comparison with thumb impression of Smt. Dhapa, in a suit where the challenge is to the decree suffered by Smt. Dhapa. The direction has been given to the petitioner for the reason that it is for the purpose of comparison of her thumb impression with that of Smt. Dhapa so as to enable the Court to come to a conclusion as to whether the petitioner had impersonated in place of Smt. Dhapa, as is the allegations of the plaintiffs in the suit filed. Infact Smt. Dhapa had expired before the filing of the suit in which she is stated to have suffered a decree. As the Court has only directed the petitioner to give her thumb impression for comparison with the thumb impression of Smt. Dhapa, to enable it to reach to a just conclusion about the allegation of impersonation, I do not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 2.4.2009 JUDGE Reema