1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 780 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 258 OF 2006 Ramesh Narayan Kadam .. Applicant. vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Smt. Sharmila Kaushik, Adv. appointed by Legal Aid Committee. Smt. P.H. Kantharia, A.P.P. for the State. Coram: Coram: Coram: J.N. PATEL &, J.N. PATEL &, J.N. PATEL &, R.S. R.S. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. MOHITE, JJ. MOHITE, JJ. Date: Date: Date: 18th January, 2007. 18th January, 2007. 18th January, 2007. P.C. . This is an application for grant of bail. We have heard the advocate appointed for the accused and perused the judgment. The accused stands convicted of an offence under section 302 of the Penal Code and is sentenced for life. Though the evidence is of circumstantial evidence, prima facie, several circumstances as listed by the trial court in para 12 2 of the judgment, in our view, indicate that there is sufficient evidence brought on record by the prosecution so as to establish the complicity of the accused. In the circumstances, this is not a fit case for grant of bail and hence, the application is rejected. The appeal may be listed in due course. (J.N. (J.N. (J.N. Patel, J. Patel, J. Patel, J. ) (R.S. (R.S. (R.S. Mohite, J.) Mohite, J.) Mohite, J.)