1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.2155 OF 2009 Hormazd Shapur Sidhwa . .. Plaintiff Vs. M/s.Multiplex Display Systems & Anr. .. Defendants Mr.Dipesh Siroya i/by M/s.Thakkar & Co. for the Plaiintiff. None for the Defendants. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. DATE : 11TH DECEMBER, 2009 P.C. : 1. The plaintiff has filed summary suit on the basis of a writing dated 11th March, 2008 coupled with the acknowledgement of liability by the Defendants to repay the said sum. 2. The plaintiff and the defendants were known to each other and a sum of Rs.11,50,000/- was invested by the Plaintiff with the Defendants. A sum of Rs.1 lakh was duly paid but for the balance sum an anknowledgement in writing has been given, based upon which the suit has been filed. The original writing is produced, coupled with the reply acknowledging the liability. There is no vakalatnama filed after the writ of summons has been duly served on the Defendants. The Defendants are residing and carrying on business at Mumbai. This Court has jurisdiction to entertain and try the suit. The suit claim is within limitation. The affidavit of service and the original documents are taken on record and marked as X and X-1 collectively for identification. There shall be a decree as ‘ ’ ‘ ’ prayed for. 2 3. Advocates costs be computed as per the rules. 4. Refund of Court fees shall be admissible, if permissible, under the rules. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)