HIGH COURT OF CHHAT‘I‘ISGARH. BILASPUR Writ Petition w} 50.2223 of 2008 PETITIONER RESPONDENN 3 Budhram S/o. Dhanmj Dewangan, aged about 66 years R/o. Village Deari, Post— Khcrefha Bazar, Tehsil Inhm, District Burg (C.G.) Val sus State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Public Works. Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Mankglaya Raipur, C.G. Engineer in Chief, Public Works Departmcnt, Near Akashwam', Raipur, C.G. Chief Engineer, Puhlic Works Deparunent, Near Akashwani, Raipur, C.G. Emmive Engimaer, Public Worka Department, Balod DMsion, District Dm‘g, C.G. Wtit Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India Appeatanoe: Shri N.K. Vyas, counsel for the pefilioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State] mspondents SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heaul. Learned counsel for. the petitioner suhmits fhat the facts and question of Iaw involved in the present writ petitim] ate eimilar to that of W,P.No. 4135/2004 (MA. Hakim -Vs~ State (if M.P. (Now C.G.) and othem), which has already been disposed of by order dated. 28.8.2006. Against the order passed in the said case, one S.L.P. was filed in Supreme Court which was also dismissed. He outlier submits that thereafter, a review petition was filed, which was also dismissed. Thus the case is squarely envenati hy the said ' j. decision. ORAL ORDER (110430081 “ @ 2 WP. (S) N03223 of 2008 Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Gnvf. Advocate, appearing for the State submits that. it is not in dispute that this matter is covemd by the dacision of M.A. Hakim’s case (supra) and this petition can he disposed of in the terms of the order passed in M.A. Hakim’s CaSc. In View of the above joint atafement made at the bar, this petiiion is disposed of in toms of the order passed in W.P. No. 4135/ 2004 (MA. Hakim —Vs- Sfate of MP. (Now C.G.) and others), which was decided on 28.8.2006. However, the reliads) claimed in the Writ petition and to be: gianted to the petitioner in terms of the order passed in WP. No. 4135/2004 (MA. Hakim’s cane (supran shall be subject to the. veriiication of the facts pleaded by the petitioner in the writ. petition. No order as to costs. Sd/- Judge Sunil Kumar Sinha vatti