HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO C.R.P. No.3621 of 2010 Dated 20-08-2010 Between: Latha Thomas ……..Petitioner Vs. Rattamma @ Venkata Rattamma and others ………Respondetns HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO C.R.P. No.3621 of 2010 ORDER: Heard both sides and at their consent, the main revision petition itself is taken up for disposal. 2. The petitioner who is the plaintiff filed this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking correctness of the order in rejecting the application in I.A.No.493 of 2010 in O.S.No.64 of 2006, on the file of V Additional District Judge (F.T.C.), Guntur, whereunder he sought for appointment of a commissioner for the purpose of recording the evidence of P.W.1. 3. Admittedly, the petitioner is not an old lady who is aged about 41 years. The Court below did not find favour with the reasons given by the petitioner. Though it has been stated by the petitioner that she filed the medical certificate previously, however, it has been noted in the impugned order that no such medical certificate was filed. Be that as it may, as stated by the petitioner, the medical certificate only goes to show that the petitioner was suffering from back pan, but it cannot be a ground for seeking such appointment of a commissioner to record the evidence. 4. Having regard to the discretion rightly exercised by the Court below, I do not find any reason warranting interference by this Court and accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. __________________ 20th August 2010 KVR