IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 22ND KARTHIKA 1931 RP.No. 1091 of 2009(U) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.16556/2007 Dated 28/07/2009 REVIEW PETITIONER(S ): PETITIONER IN WPC DR. T.G.JAYAKHAR, LECTURER (HIGHER GRADE), DEPARTMENT OF ROGA NIDANAM, VAIDYARATNAM AYURVEDA COLLEGE, THAIKATTUSSERY P.O., OLLUR. BY ADV. SMT.S.KARTHIKA SRI.M.S.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.M.R.ANISON SMT.K.P.GEETHA MANI RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS IN WPC 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT., HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF AYURVEDA MEDICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE MANAGER, VAIDYARATNAM AYURVEDA COLLEGE, OLLUR, THRISSUR. 4. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR. 5. DR. P.P.RAGHAVAN, LECTURER, DEPARTMENT OF SALAKYATHANTRAM, VAIDYARATNAM AYURVEDA COLLEGE, OLLUR, THAIKKATTUSSERY, TRICHUR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR ADV. SRI. K.R.B. KAIMAL SRI. P.C. SASIDHARAN, S.C. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= R.P. Mo. 1091 of 2009 in W. P (C) No. 16556 of 2007 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 13th November, 2009. O R D E R This review petition is filed by the petitioner in the writ petition seeking review of my judgment dated 28-7-2009 in W.P(C) No. 16556/2007 in so far as the petitioner is concerned. The grievance of the petitioner is that although the petitioner has been directed to be given notional promotion if the petitioner is found to be entitled to such promotion, monetary benefits have been denied to him, which, according to the petitioner, is wrong. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. I do not think that the petitioner has made out a case for review of my judgment insofar as I consciously denied monetary benefits to the petitioner, since he has already retired from service and he has been directed to be given promotion notionally, if eligible. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.