IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.281-M of 2011 Date of Decision:24.2.2011 Harpreet Kaur and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Ashutosh Hoshiarpuri, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. Sidharth Sarup, D.A.G. Haryana. Mr. Kuldeep Singh, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 and 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Haryana State on instructions from ASI Sushil Kumar states that respondents No.4 and 5 have submitted their affidavits submitting therein that they have no concern with the petitioners. Respondents No.4 and 5 are present in the Court through their respective counsel. Learned counsel for respondents No.4 and 5 also states that respondents No.4 and 5 shall not harass the petitioners in any manner. They need not have any fear from respondents No.4 and 5. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that in case petitioners still feel threatened at the hands of respondents No.4 and 5 in any manner, they shall be at liberty to approach the concerned SP/SSP, who shall look into and take appropriate action in accordance with law. 24.2.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE