IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1042 OF 2006. APPLICATION NO.1042 OF 2006. APPLICATION NO.1042 OF 2006. IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 951 OF 2006. APPEAL NO. 951 OF 2006. APPEAL NO. 951 OF 2006. Nivasrao Narayan Jadhav. ... Applicant. Versus. State of Maharashtra & anr. ... Respondents. Shri Mithare i/by Shri Amol Patankar and Sandesh Gavhane for the Applicant. Shri S.R.Shinde, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 5th October, 2006. : 5th October, 2006. : 5th October, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocates appearing for the parties. The Appeal is already admitted. The conviction of the Applicant is for offences under section 7 and section 13(1)(d) read with section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The substantive sentence is of one year. The fine amount has been deposited. Throughout the trial the Applicant was on bail. There is no allegation of misuse of liberty granted during the pendency of the trial. Hence the Applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 2. The Application is disposed of by the following order: i) The Applicant shall be enlarged on the same : 2 : 2 : 2 : bail on which he was enlarged during the pendency of the trial, subject to filing of fresh bonds. ii) Bail is granted subject to condition that the Applicant will report to the A.C.B. Sangli once in a month till the disposal of the Appeal. Judge. Judge. Judge.