1 cp335.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 335 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4381 OF 2007 [ Vishnu Prabhu Kadam vs. S.J. Koche & Ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. B.L. Dhas, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. D.R. Kale, AGP for Resp.Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. P.P. Dama, Advocate for Resp.No. 5. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 16TH SEPTEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . This contempt petition alleges disobedience of the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition NO.4381 of 2007 on 03-12-2007. This Court in Para-3 of the said order, directed respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in the writ petition to consider the claim of the petitioners for rental compensation at an early date and in any case within a period 2 cp335.11 of four months from 03-12-2007. 2. In pursuant to the notice of this contempt petition, affidavit in reply is filed on behalf of the Collector, Beed. In the said affidavit in reply, it is stated that the claim of the petitioner for rental compensation has been decided on 06-09-2011. This Court expresses the displeasure about the conduct and act of respondent No.1 in not deciding the claim of the petitioner within stipulated period of four months from 03-12-2007. 3. Since, respondent No.1 has tendered unconditional apology in Para-3 of the affidavit in reply and the claim of the petitioner has been decided on 06-09-2011, nothing further survives for consideration in this contempt petition. The Contempt Petition stands disposed of. Notice stands discharged. 3 cp335.11 . If the petitioner is aggrieved by the decision of the Collector, Beed dated 06-09-2011, he will be entitled to file appropriate proceedings before appropriate Forum for redressal of his grievance. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/SEP11