IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1525 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO. 1525 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO. 1525 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO. 253 OF 2004 NO. 253 OF 2004 NO. 253 OF 2004 IN IN IN COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY PETITION NO. 90 OF 1999 PETITION NO. 90 OF 1999 PETITION NO. 90 OF 1999 IN IN IN NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 734 OF 1998 OF MOTION NO. 734 OF 1998 OF MOTION NO. 734 OF 1998 IN IN IN M.J. M.J. M.J. SUIT NO. 49 OF 1998 SUIT NO. 49 OF 1998 SUIT NO. 49 OF 1998 Ahmed Raza Kazim Raza Moulvi ] .. Appellant (Ori.Respondent) Versus Mrs. Batul Ahmed Raza Kazim Razz Moulvi] .. Respondent (Ori.Petitioner) Mr. A.N. Maniyar for the appellant. CORAM: R.M. LODHA & S.A. BOBDE, JJ. DATED: 25TH SEPTEMBER, 2006 P.C. : . We heard Mr. A.N. Maniyar, the counsel for the appellant. He submits that talks of settlement between the parties have failed. Nobody appears for the respondent. 2. Until disposal of the Appeal, execution of warrant of arrest shall remain stayed, subject to the appellant depositing a further sum of Rs.45,000/- with the Prothonotary & Senior Master within two weeks from : 2 : today. In case the appellant fails to deposit the amount of Rs.45,000/- within two weeks, the warrant of arrest shall become executable. The respondent is at liberty to withdraw the amount so deposited by the appellant. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- [S.A. [S.A. [S.A. BOBDE, J.] BOBDE, J.] BOBDE, J.]