IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.963 of 2010 SMT. RADHA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 04.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though the petitioner is the rightful owner of the property in question and through the processes of the Civil Court she got the delivery of possession, however the persons mentioned in her application given to the Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur as contained in Annexure-1 have committed theft and have also threatened for dire consequences and the police is not taking any action. Learned counsel for the State on the other hand submits that on the complaint of the petitioner the first information report Vide Bhagalpur Sadar Kotwali P.S. Case No. 254 of 2005 was registered on 17th April, 2005 (Annexure-3),and as such, the allegation of the petitioner is not correct. Be that as it may, notwithstanding the rival submissions of the parties, in case petitioner has got any grievance with respect to not registering the first information report for the alleged acts on the part of the persons mentioned in Annexure-1, it will be open for the petitioner to take the appropriate recourse of law as provided under the Code of Criminal Procedure. The writ application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)