1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 375 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 2551 OF 2008 Shri Gulam Sabir Qureshi ....Plaintiff Versus M/s. Seaking Club Pvt. Ltd. ....Defendant/ Applicant. Mr. D. Zaiwalla, Sr. Counsel al/w. Mr. Prashant Desai i/b. M/s. Billawala & Co. for the Applicant/Defendant. Mr. Ramesh Dubey i/b. M/s. Ajay Misar, Advocate for the Plaintiff. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATE : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C. : Heard Mr. Zaiwalla, learned Senior Counsel for the Defendant and Mr.Dubey, learned Counsel for the Plaintiff. 2. The present chamber summons is taken out by the Defendant for inspection of the documents referred by the Plaintiff in his plaint. The Defendant has further prayed for direction to the Plaintiff to disclose on oath and furnish to the Defendant with the particulars as set out in the schedule annexed and marked as Exhibit “A” to the Chamber Summons. 2 3. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiff, opposes prayer (a) on the ground that Noorali Kasamali Jagmagia is not authorised to act on behalf of the Defendant-Company. Mr. Zaiwalla, learned Senior Counsel, pointed out that already resolution of the Defendant- Company is given to the Plaintiff’s Advocate which discloses that the said Noorali Kasamali Jagmagia is the Director of Defendant-Company. 4. In the above circumstances, in my view, the Plaintiff cannot oppose prayer (a) and the same is accordingly granted. The Plaintiff shall give inspection of the documents referred in the plaint to the Defendant within a period of three weeks from today. So far as prayer (b) is concerned, in my opinion, same cannot be granted at this stage. The particulars set out in the schedule is matter of evidence that can be considered at the time of the trial of the suit. The Chamber Summons is accordingly, disposed of. Sd/- (R. V. MORE, J.) 3