IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH OCTOBER 2009 / 8TH KARTHIKA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 377 of 2009(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.20672/2008 Dated 09/07/2008 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- SREEKALA, AGED 38 YEARS, WIFE OF CHANDRAN, RESIDING AT MANCHKKASTTIL HOUSE, THIRUVANKULAM P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.SREEKUMAR SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- SURESH BABU, TALUK SURVEYOR, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, NAME OF THE FATHER AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR FOR R THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J ............................................... Cont. Case No. 377 of 2009 ................................................. Dated this the 30th day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner in this contempt case is that the direction in Annexure A1 judgment has not been complied with. The direction in Annexure A1 judgment is as follows: “In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P3 application and pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and others, if any, likely to be affected by the same. If the 1st respondent decides that the measurements as requested for has to be done, the same shall be completed within another period of one month. The petitioner shall forward a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition to the 1st respondent for compliance.” The contention of the learned Government pleader is that the direction could not be complied with, since the petitioner has not paid the prescribed fees for survey. Now it is admitted that subsequently the petitioner has paid the prescribed fees. The learned Government Pleader also submits that now that the fees have been paid, the directions would be complied with within one month as directed in Annexure A1. This is recorded and the Cont. Case No. 377 of 2009 -2- contempt case is closed. The petitioner would be free to file an application to restore this contempt case, if the judgment is not complied with within one month from today. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE rhs