IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21303 of 2011 Bipin Kumar Singh Versus Sabita Devi ---------------------------------- 02. 02.12.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. By the impugned order, the petitioner has been directed to pay Rs.2,000 as monthly maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act to the wife-respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner’s name appears in B.P.L. list and he has been issued B.P.L. card also and his yearly income is below Rs.36,000 and moreover, he has got only 1 bigha land and, therefore, he is unable to pay Rs.2,000 as monthly maintenance to his wife. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that these facts were raised before the Court below and in support of the same, documents were also filed before the Court below. After considering these materials by the impugned order, the Court below directed the petitioner to pay Rs.2,000 as maintenance and litigation cost per month to the respondent. Therefore, in supervisory jurisdiction, this Court cannot re-evaluate the materials and substitute its own finding regarding the quantum fixed by the Court below which appears to be reasonable. Thus, I 2 find no reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. Saurabh (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)