IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 262 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 635 OF 2008 RATNAKAR RAM PRABHU DESSAI (DECEASED) THROUGH LR'S ... Applicant Versus SMT. JAYASHREE GANESH PRABHU ALIAS JAYASHREE GANESH POROB AND 8 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Vivek Rodrigues, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. P. Arolkar, Advocate for Respondent no.5(a). Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 10th June, 2010 P.C.: Heard Shri Rodrigues on behalf of the applicants, who are respondents nos. 6(a) to (c),7,8(a) to 8(i) and 4. Original petitioner, who is duly served is absent. 2. Shri Rodrigues on behalf of the applicants does not press for the words "immediately on conclusion of hearing of each case, at different times" being included in the order dated 18/02/2009 passed by this Court. Counsel on behalf of the other respondents has no objection to the application for speaking to the minutes as according to the learned Counsel, the proposed changes do not affect him. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the other suggested additions to be made in the order dated 18/02/2009 are reasonable and will not cause any prejudice to the petitioner and therefore the application deserves to succeed. 3. As a result, the words "and his witnesses" shall be added after the word "himself" in para 4, and before the word "available". Likewise, the word "and" shall be added in para 4 before the word "Trial Court" and after figure 4. Further, following words shall be added, "subject to the hearing of all the lawful objections that may be raised to those documents by these Respondents and allowing cross examination on such documents" shall be added after the figures 92/1999 and before the words "Trial Court" in the order. 4. Application disposed off accordingly. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH