IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 315 of 2011 Decided on: 9.9.2011 Niku Ram …Petitioner Versus Shri Rajesh Bakshi …Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate . General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant . Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Assistant Advocate General, on the basis of instructions imparted to him by the respondent, is permitted to withdraw the office order dated 30.8.2011. 2. It is made clear by way of abundant precaution that the respondent shall decide the case of the petitioner by passing a speaking/detailed/reasoned order within a period of three weeks from today. Consequently, the present contempt petition stands disposed of. Notice is discharged. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge Septemebr 9, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?