IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Appeal No. 62 of 2005 in Writ Petition No. 1827 of 2004 M/s Jayantilal Investment ..Appellant vs. 1. Purushottam Devji Patel & Ors. ..Respondents Shri Y.S.Jahagirdar, Sr.Counsel i/b Shri C.R.Naidu for appellant. Shri S.B.Amin for respondent nos. 1 and 2. CORAM: A.P.SHAH & CORAM: A.P.SHAH & CORAM: A.P.SHAH & S.J.VAZIFDAR JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR JJ. 7th February,2005 7th February,2005 7th February,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Advocates. 2. In our view there is really no need to review the order as the learned single Judge has deleted the word "admittedly" from the order. However, by way of abundant caution we clarify that the observations made in the order will not prejudice the rights and contentions of both the parties. 3. Appeal stands disposed of.