IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3 OF 2009 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.8 OF 2006 Dr. M. Furquan s/o. Mohd. Yaqoob ... Applicant Vs. Shri Praful Patel, Minister of Civil Aviation, Union of India and others. ... Respondents ALONGWITH PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.8 OF 2006 Dr. M. Furquan s/o. Mohd. Yaqoob ... Petitioner Vs. Shri Praful Patel, Minister of Civil Aviation, Union of India and others. ... Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.548 OF 2009 Administraqtor of Specified Undertaking of the Unit Trust of India and another. ... Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ALONGWITH PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.3 OF 2006 Shoaib alias Richie Sequeira ... Petitioner Vs. Union of India and others ... Respondents ALONGWITH PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.12 OF 2006 Jayprakash Gulabrao Kadam ... Petitioner Vs. The Union of India and others ... Respondents ALONGWITH PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.13 OF 2006 Shoaib alias Richie Sequeira ... Petitioner Vs. Union of India and others ... Respondents Mr. K.T. Thomas with Mr. K.B. Suresh for the applicant in Cri. Appln.No. 3 of 2009. Mr. Milind Sathe, Senior Advocate i/by Mr. A.S. Dayal for the respondent No.1 in Cri.Appln.No.3 of 2009. Mr. Ravi Kadam, Advocate General for UTI. Ms. A.S. Pai, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Mr. Shoaib @ Richie Sequeira in person in PIL No.3 of 2006 and 13 of 2006. Ms. Rajani Iyer i/by M/s. K. Ashar & Co. for the petitioner in W.P. No.548 of 2009. Mr. Sumeet Moholikar i/by M/s. S.K. Srivastava & Co.for the respondent No.5 in PIL No.13 of 2006. Mr. J.C. Satpute for the respondents-Union of India and CBI in PIL Nos.3 of 2006, 8 of 2006 and 13 of 2006. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 9TH JULY, 2009 P.C.: Today in court copy of the letter dated 8th July, 2009 has been filed which has been addressed to the Additional Public Prosecutor by the Director General of Police. According to this, it has been decided by the appropriate authority to entrust the investigation of the case to the State C.I.D., M.S. Pune under the overall supervision of Additional Director General of Police, C.I.D., Maharashtra State, Pune. 2. Further, the learned counsel appearing for the UTI has stated that they already have decrees and UTI will leave no stone unturned to recover their monies in accordance with law. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State submits that they would complete the investigation at the earliest and would submit final report to the court of competent jurisdiction and the copy thereof to the Registrar General of this court on the administrative side. In view of the statement made on behalf of the various parties to the petition, nothing survives in all these writ petitions. We also make it clear that any observation made in the Magistrate's order will not be of any consequence but all these matters would be subject to the final report which will be prepared by the investigating agency. Petitioner is at liberty to place any additional information or facts if he wishes to within two weeks from today from the DIG, Pune which will also be examined in accordance with law. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in Public Interest Litigation No.8 of 2006 does not press this PIL. All the PILs stand disposed of. Final investigation should be completed preferably within six months from today. Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.