Civil Revision No. 3370 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3370 of 2011 Date of Decision: 20.5.2011 *** Asha Rani .. Petitioner Vs. Brij Mohan & Ors. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. JJ Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The present petitioner-JD is aggrieved with the order dated 25.3.2011 by dint of which her objections filed in the execution proceedings for implementation of the judgment and decree dated 18.12.2007, have been dismissed. Heard. The objection of the petitioner-JD that the decree is not executable because no description of the property was given, does not find favour of the Court below as it was found that such an objection was adjudicated by the appellate Court below while hearing the appeal of the defendant against the judgment and decree dated 18.12.2007, by framing a specific issue and it was conclude that no doubt is there as to the identity of the property. That apart the suit property is identifiable as a separate suit for partition is being filed. So far as the objection of non-impleading of Sudesh Mittar, Manju Agnihotri and Om Wati, is concerned, it was rightly held that since they were not party to the main suit, their non-joining in the execution proceedings is not necessary. In this view of the matter, there is no illegality or perversity in the impugned order. Dismissed. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE May 20, 2011 Jiten