IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39767 of 2010 MD. NASIMUDDIN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 18.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Torture for demand of dowry is doubted on the ground that she (complainant) is not willing to reside in matrimonial house which is clear from complainant’s statement on solemn affirmation that she came to her parents’ house with her father and she is not willing to reside with her husband even on his request. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 171 of 2010 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M., Ist Class, Sikrahana at Motihari subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)