HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Sinale^Bench Aoplicant Respondents Defendant Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh., C.R^No.135/2008 Gulabdatt Dubey, aged about 72/years, S/o Late Kedarnath Dubey, R/o/Village Sardi, Tahsil Baikunthpur, Distt. Korea Versus 1. Raja Bhupendra Narayan Singh, S/o Late. Ramanuj Prasad Singh Dev, R/o Village Baikunthpur, Distt. Korea (C.G.) Plaintiffs 2. Baliram, S/o Late Ram Prasad, aged about 32 years, 3. Prem Narayan, S/o Late Ram Prasad, aged about 31 years, 4. Vimla Bai,D/o Late Ram Prasad, aged about 30 years, 5. Kaushilya Bai, Wd/o Late Ram Prasad, All R/o Patna, Baikunthpur, Distt. Sarguja CiviLReyisipnAJnderSection 115 of Code of CivitProcedure Present : Shri D.N.Prajapati, counselfortheapplicant. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 17th September, 2008) Heard on I.A.No.1 for condonation of delay in filing the civil revision. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant stated that the revision is filed after a delay of 340 days. Certified copy of the impugned order dated 28.06.2007 was applied on 24.07.2007 and received on 25.07.2007. The revision is filed on 01 .09.2008. l am of the considered opinion that the application does not disclose any good reason for condonation ofdelay. 3. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the applicant has also not been able to demonstrate that he has an arguable case. By the impugned order dated 28.06.2007 passed by the Civil Judge Class-1, District Koria, the application filed by the applicant/auction purchaser for obtaining possession was dismissed as barred by limitation. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is unable to furnish documentary proof of having purchased the property in auction. 4. In this view of the matter, the application for condonation of delay is dismissed. As a consequence thereof the revision is also dismissed as barred by limitation. g^y Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge '4W