( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.147 OF 2007 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.147 OF 2007 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.147 OF 2007 Balu Krishna Jadhav .. Applicant. Versus Pandurang Barku Kesarkar & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr.Pramod Kathane for the applicant. Mr.Farukh N.Kotwal for respondent No.1. Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for respondent No.2-State. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 29th April, 2008. DATED : 29th April, 2008. DATED : 29th April, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Advocate appearing for the applicant. 2. Challenge put up to the impugned judgement dated 5.2.2007 passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 5th Court, Dadar, Mumbai cannot sustain in the wake of observations of the learned Trial Judge that the three witnesses, namely; P.W.2, 3 and 4 had stated that which vehicle gave the dash to the petitioner could not be noted by them. In ( 2 ) addition to that paragraph 11 of the judgement shows that the petitioner-victim of the accident P.W.1 could not establish the identity of the accused as the driver of the alleged vehicle. If this is the quality of the evidence, there is no need to interfere in the impugned judgement and as such the petition is required to be dismissed. It is to be noted that the State of Maharashtra has not filed any Appeal challenging the order of acquittal. Hence the order :- a) Petition is dismissed. (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.)