IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8810 OF 2009 Shrikant Dattatraya Naikude .... Petitioner Vs. Shankar Basapa naikude (Since deceased through his heirs) Sarabai Shankar Naikude & Ors. .... Respondents Mr.Vijay Killedar for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATE : 16 th OCTOBER, 2009. P.C. : 1. Not on Board. Taken on Board. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. 3. By the impugned order, the Respondents/Defendants have been permitted to amend their written statement. The trial court has held that the amendment is consistent with the defence which is already raised. Considering the nature of the amendment allowed and the impugned order being an interlocutory order, at this stage no interference in a petition under section 227 of the Constitution of India can be made. If the decree passed in the suit is adverse to the Petitioner, the order impugned can always be challenged by the Petitioner while preferring an appeal against the decree. Subject to what is observed above, the writ petition is rejected by keeping all rights and contentions of the Petitioner open. [A.S. OKA, J.]