IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH MARCH 2009 / 20TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 7461 of 2009(C) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- P.T.ANIYANKUNJU, PUTHENVEETTIL, AJI NIVAS, COLLECTORATE P.O., KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 7461 OF 2009 (C) ==================== Dated this the 11th day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that by Ext.P1, transfer of permit was allowed. However, the same was not endorsed for the reason that clearance certificate from the Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Board was not produced. It is stated that subsequently petitioner obtained Ext.P2 and although the same was also produced before the respondent, despite having made Ext.P3 representation seeking early orders, endorsement in pursuance to Ext.P1 has not so far been effected. It is with that grievance, the writ petition is filed. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, the reason for not endorsing transfer of permit allowed by Ext.P1 was the non production of the clearance certificate, with the production of Ext.P2, there cannot be any justification for further delay in this matter. 3. Now that the petitioner submits that he has also produced Ext.P2, I direct the respondent to endorse the transfer WPC 7461/09 :2 : of permit, if non production of clearance certificate was the only reason for the delay. Writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid directions. Petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment before the respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp