IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 967 of 2011 Date of Decision : March 8, 2011 Yogesh Kumar Petitioner Versus The State of H.P. and ors. Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl.A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner claims work charge status, arrears and other consequential benefits from the date he completed eight years of service. Reliance is placed on the decision of this Court date 28th July, 2010 rendered in Rakesh Kumar versus state of H.P. and others, CWP No. 2735 of 2010. 2. The learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The petitioner may file an appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the second respondent within a period of one month from today. The second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in light also of the decision referred 2 to above within a period of another four months. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment referred to in this judgment while submitting the representation. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s) if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. March 8, 2011 (PK/Pankaj)