IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.41894 of 2011 Ramaji Yadav & Anr. Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 13.12.2011 Heard the parties. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in Phulwaria P.S. Case No. 71/2011 for offences under Section 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The present petitioners are father-in-law and Devar of the deceased respectively and the husband of the deceased, namely, Bittu Yadav is in judicial custody which is apparent from paragraph-9 of the present petition. According to the F.I.R. it appears that the deceased was married with Bittu Yadav in June, 2010. The Gouna had been performed in the month of March, 2011 and when the deceased went to Sasural she was demanded the dowry and faced the torture due to non-fulfillment of demand. On 13.5.2011 the informant learnt that his daughter had been killed. He reached the place and learnt that in the last night itself, the body of the victim lady was cremated after she having suffered death because of burning. He has disclosed the name of the petitioners and others. In a similar facts and circumstances, namely, Hare Ram Yadav and Rajdeyi Devi have been granted bail in Cr. Misc. Nos. 32605 of 2011 and 36311 of 2011. In the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from to-day petitioners, namely, (1) Ramaji Yadav and (2) Rajesh Yadav are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in Phulwaria P.S. Case No. 71/2011, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. and with the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and the other shall be the father of the petitioners and they will also cooperate with the trial and it is expected that they will present on the date of commitment as well as during trial of the case. If the petitioners remain absent for two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of petitioners. . Mkc/ (Shivaji Pandey, J.)