1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.925 OF 2011 Anil Tanaji Mane .Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr.J.D.Mane, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 7TH DECEMBER, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. The learned APP states that the investigating officer is not present even today. The order dated 16th November, 2011 is confirmed subject to following conditions. (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required. (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or 2 promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. . The order will remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge sheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in AIR 2011 (SC) 312(Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State of Maharashtra And Ors.). 3. Anticipatory Bail Application stands disposed of. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)