IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.02.2010 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R. SUDHAKAR W.P.No. 42271 of 2006 (OA.No.7267/99) S. RONIKKAMARY .. PETITIONER Vs. 1 STATE OF TAMILNADU REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT HARIJAN WELFARE DEPT. SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI-9 2 THE DIRECTOR OF ADI DRAVIDAR WELFARE, CHEPAUK, CHENNAI-5 3 THE DISTRICT ADI DRAVIDAR WELFARE OFFICER, TRICHY. .. RESPONDENTS Prayer Original Application No. 7267 of 1999 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench to issue a direction to the respondents to pay the monthly pension on the basis of the last pay drawn i.e. 9,925/- and other retirement benefits namely, commutation of pension and gratuity of pension on the basis of the last pay drawn as on 27.2.99 with 18% interest per annum and costs. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was transferred and numbered as Writ petition. For Petitioner .. Mr. R. Singaravelan For Respondents .. Mr.S.Sivashanmugam, Government Advocate ORDER Original Application No. 7267 of 1999 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench to issue a direction to the respondents to pay the monthly pension on the basis of the last pay drawn i.e. 9,925/- and other retirement benefits namely, commutation of pension and gratuity of pension on the basis of the last pay drawn as on 27.2.99 with 18% interest per https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ annum and costs. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was transferred and numbered as Writ petition. 2. The petitioner retired as Matron in the Govt. Girls Hostel in Musiri Taluk in the cadre of B.T. Assistant. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Accountant General Office has sought for clarification from the second respondent with regard to benefits to be given to petitioners plea as above. The claim for pensionary benefits has not been properly considered by the authorities, and therefore, the Original application has been filed. 3. No reply has been filed by the respondents. 4. In such view of the matter, petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation to the 1st respondent. The first respondent is directed to consider the representation to be made by the petitioner taking into consideration the promotion order and the clarification sought for by the Accountant General Office as pointed out by the petitioner. The authority is directed to pass appropriate proceedings based on the representation within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of such representation. The writ petition stands is order as above. No costs. sms Sd/- Asst. Registrar //True Copy// Sub Asst. Registrar To 1 THE SECRETARY TO GOVT STATE OF TAMILNADU HARIJAN WELFARE DEPT. SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI-9 2 THE DIRECTOR OF ADI DRAVIDAR WELFARE, CHEPAUK, CHENNAI-5 3 THE DISTRICT ADI DRAVIDAR WELFARE OFFICER, TRICHY. + 1 cc to Mr. R.Singgaravelan, Advocate SR No.11681 + 1 cc to Government Pleader, High Court, Madras SR No.11924 KS(CO) SR/23.3.2010 W.P.No. 42271 of 2006 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/