1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1348 OF 2009 Shri Amit Rajabhau Lande ...... Applicant. V/s State of Maharashtra ..... Respondent Mr. K.S. Patil i/b Deepak Shinde for the applicant. Mr. D.P. Adsule, APP for the State. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 23rd March, 2009 P.C:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. An offence has been registered against the present applicant under section 326 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that, initially, when the FIR was lodged, the name of the applicant was not mentioned and in the supplementary statement, his name has been mentioned. It is submitted that the nature of injury is not grievous and the said offence under section 326 has been mentioned in the FIR in order to aggravate the said offence. 3. In my view, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail since the applicant has been attributed a specific role in 2 the assault on the victim. Application for anticipatory bail is dismissed. Applicant may approach the regular court for bail. The said contention of the applicant that the injury is not grievous is kept open. Applicant is given 7 days time to approach the competent court. 4. Application is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)