IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2010 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 12433 of 2010(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- THOMAS.T.PAIKADA, S/O. THOMAS PAIKADA, AGED 25, PAIKADA HOUSE, STATE WAREHOUSE ROAD, PALA.P.O. KOTTAYAM DIST. BY ADV. SMT.K.V.BHADRA KUMARI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, COCHIN UNIVERSITY P.O., KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM DIST. 2. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF COCHIN, KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM DIST. ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI,SC,COCHI U FOR R1-2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 12433 of 2010-D - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of April, 2010. JUDGMENT The petitioner has completed his B.Tech degree course in Electronics and Communication Engineering from Model Engineering College, Thrikkara under the second respondent University. His final semester examination result was published on 1.1.2009. The percentage of marks obtained by him in various semester examinations are detailed in para 1 of the writ petition. It is submitted by the petitioner that in the 7th semester examination he failed in one subject, i.e. Computer Networks and got only 32 marks out of 100 and in the internal examination he has got 41 marks out of 50. Ext.P1 is the copy of the mark list in the 7th semester examination. He wrote the examination in the failed subject and again he failed in the said examination. Accordingly he applied for revaluation of the said paper on 8.1.2010 Ext.P2 is copy of the receipt evidencing payment of fee for revaluation. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he got selection for MHRM Programme In Rajagiri College of Social Sciences and since the result of the revaluation has not been finalized, the said college granted some more wpc12433 /2010 2 time to the petitioner to produce the mark list. The petitioner submits that unless the results of the revaluation is published at the earliest, he will lose his chance for getting admission to a prosperous course. It is in these circumstances, this writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the University to publish the results of the revaluation within a time frame. 3. Heard learned Standing Counsel for the University. 4. There will be a direction to the respondents to complete the process of revaluation of the petitioner's answer paper and to publish the results as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, if the application and the fee remitted are otherwise in order. The results shall be communicated to the petitioner also. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/