IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7940 of 2010 BHARAT PRASAD AGED 63 YEARS SON OF JIBLAT MEHTA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST OFFICE – AMBARI, SHEIKHPURA (OLD MUNGER) AT PRESENT RESIDENT RAMKRISNA NAGAR, DIWA COLONY BEHIND DEVNARAYAN MARKET Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GRAMIN KARYA VIBAG, PATNA. 2. THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, GARAMIN KARYA VIBAG, PATNA. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, GRAMIN KARYA VIBAG, PATNA. 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, GRAMIN KARYA VIBAG, PATNA CIRCLE. ----------- 02. 05.05.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. It is submitted that petitioner retired on 31st of March as Junior Engineer from the office of respondent no. 5, however, pension as also the gratuity have not been sanctioned till date. It is further submitted that the amount of GPF has also not been paid fully. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the averments made in the petition as also the representation did not contain the relevant details. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 5 with 2 regard to the sanction of gratuity and a separate representation before the respondent no. 10 with regard to the payment on account of GPF. In such view of the matter, in case such representations stating details of unpaid claims are filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondents shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid. However, upon consideration, if any of the claims or part of the claims is found not admissible, the same shall he informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)