[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.1837 OF 2008 Bharatkumar Jamnadas Kagadada (Patni) ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr...Respondents ... Ms.Sandhya Nanavare advocate for applicant Mr.A.S.Shitole A.P.P. for the State Ms.Darpana Nagarkar i/b Bhavesh Parmar Adv. for Respondent no.2 ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : OCTOBER 15, 2008 DATE : OCTOBER 15, 2008 DATE : OCTOBER 15, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant-original accused, the learned advocate for the respondent no.2-original complainant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. Both the parties are present in Court. 2. The complaint under section 406 of IPC came to be lodged by respondent-wife against the applicant who was the husband. The said case is numbered as 1238/S/SW/2002 and it is pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 26th Court, Borivali, Mumbai. [-2-] 3. The learned advocates for the parties state that the parties have amicably settled the matter and parties have tendered consent terms which are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. In view of the consent terms, Case No.1238/S/SW/2002 pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 26th Court, Borivali, Mumbai is quashed. 4. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]