ESatBNiiiKSia... latilSit^N'iHS?- mGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W.P.No. 1066 OF 2003 Petitioner : Basant Kumar Vadu, S/o late Shri Hemnath Yadu, aged about 52 years, R'o Nava Tikrapara, Khairagarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon Resoondents Versus 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. State ofCUhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of Public Works, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Asstt. Secretary, Public Works Dqiartment, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan-Raipur (CG) Superintendent Engineer, P.W.D, Durg Circle, Distt. Dui-g (CG) Executive Et^ineer, P.W.D., Khairagarh Division, Khairagarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) Sub Dmsional Officer, P.W.D, (B&R), Khairagarh Sub Div-ision, B3iairagarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) Shri R.S. BagheL leamed counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, leamed Dy. Govt. Advocate for State/respondents. ORAL ORDER (2n<l February, 2006) The petitioner, who was working as Asstt. Grade-IH in Public Works Department was attached to the OfiBce of Superintending Engineer, PubUc Works Department, Circle Durg temporarily vide order dated 11.2.2003 Annexure P-2. 2. The petitioner has filed fllis petition impugning the said order dated 11.2.2003. This Court vide order dated g.4.2003 has stsn'ed the operation of the impugned brder dated 11.2.2003. The petitioner has continued to worlc on the same place of posting. At this stage, it is not necessary to go into the validity of the impugned order dated 112.2003. By -vstxie of the order dated 18.4.2003, the petitioner has already been granted reliefand thereby he continued to work. 3. In view offoregoing, the petition stands disposed ofand the respondents are at liberty to pass any transfer order to post the petitioner in the Public Interest and ^ -^'Hi.u- ";~N. on administrative exigency. The petitioner is also granted liberty to impugn the same, if so adv-ised. In tlie facts ofthe case, (he respondents/authorities are directed not to insist on compliance ofthe impugned traasfer order. ;.-ir 4. For the reasons stated above, the writ petition is dismissed as havini become infiTictuous. No order as to costs. §((/. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ill;.,.., & .A-^-' '""^fitelsSgy' •"-^-TB^^^:.,