IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 3889 of 2010 Date of decision: 03.08.2010 Sardar Rajinder Singh Memorial Mukat College of Education ...Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Balram Gupta, senior Advocate with Ms.Anamika Negi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Jattana, Addl.AG, Punjab for the State. Mr. Ajay Singla, Advocate for respondent No. 3. Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Advocate for NCTE/ respondents No. 4 and 5. RANJIT SINGH J. On 06.07.2010, it was stated as under before this Court: “ As per Mr. Gupta, NCTE has already allowed the appeal of the petitioner and had directed the NRC to grant the necessary affiliation and recognition within a period of 15 days. He has handed over the copy of the order passed by the NCTE to the counsel representing the NRC, who prays for time to have instructions. In the meantime, copy of the order be kept on record.” The counsel for NCTE says that the appeal has since been allowed and the matter is likely to be placed before NRC in the Civil Writ Petition No. 3889 of 2010 -2- next meeting, which is likely to be held within one month or so. Accordingly, the relief claimed in the writ petition stands granted. The writ petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. In case, the petitioner is still left with any grievance or the meeting is not held within one month or so, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive the writ petition. August 03, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE