IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER MONDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1930 Cont.Case(C).No.983 of 2008(S) --------------------------------------------------------- ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).20656/2003, DATED 14/03/2008 .................... PETITIONER: PETITIONER:- ----------------------------------------- K.M.KALA, COMMAND STADIUM LABOURER (SAFFALWAL) , NAVAL AIRCRAFT YARD, KOCHI. BY ADV. SRI.M.CHATHUKUTTY NAMBIAR. RESPONDENT: 1ST RESPONDENT:- ----------------------------------------------------- MR. S.K.DAMLE, AGE 55, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) FLAG OFFICER, COMMANDING IN CHIEF, NAVAL BASE, KOCHI. BY ASST.SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR ADV. SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN,SENIOR PANEL COUNSEL THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:- H.L.Dattu, C.J. & A.K.Basheer, J. ---------------------------------------------- Cont.Case (C).No.983 of 2008-S ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 24th November, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu,C.J. Petitioner's learned counsel is not present before this Court. (2) Inter-alia alleging, that, the respondent has not complied with the orders and directions issued by this Court in W.P.(C).No.20656 of 2003, dated 14th March, 2008, the petitioner has filed this contempt petition before us. (3) This Court, while disposing of W.P.(C).No.20656 of 2003, has stated as under:- “It is submitted that except the petitioner, similarly situated persons have already been granted regularization. There will be a direction to the first respondent to take appropriate action on Exhibit P6 representation, in the light of the benefits granted to the similarly situated persons, within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment”. (4) The respondent, in the counter affidavit filed, has stated, that, after considering the case of the petitioner, they have passed a speaking order and they have also communicated the same to the Cont.Case (C).No.983/2008-S - 2 - petitioner. If that is so, in our opinion, the petitioner has to question the correctness or otherwise of the orders passed by the respondent before the appropriate forum. In that view of the matter, we do not intend to take cognizance of this contempt petition and the same is, accordingly, closed. Ordered accordingly. H.L.Dattu Chief Justice A.K.Basheer vku/- Judge