3W TEE HIG-H E‘GEE’T @F JUBEQATETRE AT KLA§§§R WRIT PE?:T:m§ m). a?“ m“ g095 PETETKBE‘EER: / Viiav Shanti Estate Pvt.Ltd, a {Piainiiiii 1 m cwmpauy Ci uiy mgm Lm‘cc‘i under Th6 r€l€vant §rovigiolls of (iompa11i63 Act having i£s registerad offic: at 84; Veer Nariman Rsad, Church Road, Mumbai {MS} iatrsr-aHa amoggm othm" hrancj'ms a branch offiCf: at Sadar Bazar, Raipur through tine Director Shri Hiralal Daga, $011 of Lam Jorawarmal Daga, resgidmH GI‘ Ew‘adm” Bazar, Raipur (C. G.) RESPOHDEE§T$: /1. Smi. Saraswati Bai, widQW {Dcfcénc’i antS) of Late Triiokchaiui Jain. 6 Shri sllnil Kumar Jain. $011 of Lam Trilakchand Jain. Both residents; of Near City Kotwali, Halwai izia, Sadar Bazar‘ RaiFur‘ / WRET ?ETITE§E§ ”JNBER ARTECLE Q27 GE? THE €QF§§TIT TIGé $F §3€i3iéu 2’ kk 78 aw QEFETIQ’EEI, 3%?WW5, .éwl Q33\ WWE§,LA'?'6(7 m: ‘ 2209 5 mm (Wk?) 311%“? m W “.1 \ Scma wa‘umvm WW W®¥§R $aifmané$1 mWgam " Q5 F Heard Miss Sharmila Sin hai, ccunsei for the petiiicner. on admiasiori. The petitioner by this grcpn’ety of the order dated 1731. 1—2004 passed by the 5m Additional Bisirict Judge. Raipur. in :\A.J.C.No.75;’£904. whereby the éeamec; Adéitional Distric: i f the reapmdents fiied ana‘er Grder 25 Quia dar far siie inspectian and rit petition haa queatianed the .egaiiiy and dudge aiiawing the appiéc—atéan 9 of the Cgde caf Civii Procedur appointed a Tehsii submitting the report. Having heard learned c unsei for the petitioner anct having regard to the facts and cireumstances of he case, i am of the opinion that it is net a fit case in which the extra or‘dina urisdic‘tion of thie Caurt shcuid be invuked. Therefcre, the writ petition is dis g iesed, at the admission stage itseif. r t tieneequentiys M(W.)P No505i2605 anti tANotEQQQOE etenct g Sci/- L.C.BHADOO disposed of. Judge