••^ mTHE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR / WRIT PETITION N0. / ^SJOF 2001 1 Satyaraj Singh, aged about 47 years Son of Shri Shivnath Singh, Inspector^M') 2 Shankarlal, aged about 57 years, Son of ShriMohanlal, Subedar {n; 3 L.M.Shufe't? aged about 56 years, 'Son of Shri Janineshwar, Sub-Inspector, (j^)} 4 G.R. Saw, aged about 57 years, Son of Shri Sadhram, Asst. Sub Inspector. [M ) 5 S.K. Dubey, aged about 42 years, Son of Late Bhushan Prasad Dubey, Asst. Sub Inspector. ^l . 6 Rajesh Shrivastava, aged about 41 years, Son of Shri Rameshwar Lal, Asst. Sub Inspector,(w 7 Ashish Shukla, aged about 36 years, -. Son of Shri M.M. Shukla, Asst. Sub Inspector, C^) 8 Rakesh Shivhare, aged about 37 years, Son of Late B.P. Shivhare, Asst. Sub Inspector, (l~s\j [y^'y 9 Deyesh Baisvare, aged about 35 years, Son of R.K. Baisvare, Asst. Sub. Inspector. (M ) 10 S.K. Kamalseeaged about 37 years, Son of Shri Chetanram, Asst. Sub Inspector, O*') 11 Sudhir Shrivastava, aged about 25 years, Son of Shri Veeresh Shrivastava, Asst. Sub Inspector, W 12 Smt. Goomadevi, aged about 29 years, Wife of Tharaanvisth, Head Constable y^f 1-12 posted in II Battalion Chhattisgarh araned police Village and post - Sakari, Bilaspur. 13 Kashiram Rajak, aged about 60 years, Son of Late Shri Hariram Rajak Retired Sub Inspector ^M) R/o. Gondpara, Bilaspur 14 Rameshwar Lal aged about 64 years, Son of Late Jawanlal, Retired Subedar, \W) Village and post - Sakari, District-Bilaspur. '^y^ aTT?i» s9- ~" a "'• \ •'X 15 Prakash Verma, aged about 51 years, Son of Late J P Verma, Sub Inspector, ^ 16 Mohd. Ismile, aged about 57 years, Lt^i^ ^ Son ofAbdul Rahman Khan, Sub Inspector \yf) ffi~ ^ :;, ^'i—-^/^/^ 17 Mohd. Akhtar Hussain, aged about 51 years, '^ •J-"' ".s^ /y • — . '^^^Ta^-^ Son of Late Tashdak Hussain, Sub Inspector, (v^) 18 Rampal Singh, aged about 43 years, Son of Shri Koinal Singh, Sub Inspector, 19 Smt Kamlasingh, aged about 44 years, Son of Shri Rajkaran Singh, Sub Inspector, ^} 20 P.K.Rai, aged about 55 years, Son of Late D P Rai, A.S.I. (wi) ^ 21 Smt Shushma Sharrna, aged about 33 years, Wife of Shri Rajendra Sharma, A.S.I. \^i) 22 Ku. Pushpa Kumbhare, aged about 31 years, D/o. Late Vitthulal, A.S.I. [vi] 23 Bhagirathi Mahar, aged about 30 years, ,,Son of Shri Mitthulal, A.S.I. ^lH; 4f 24 Ramayan Yadav, aged about 27 years, Son of Shri Shyamlal, A.S.I. W) 15-24 Posted in.Range Motor Transport Workshop, Police Line, Bilaspur. (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS ./ y •~/ 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : the Chief Secretaiy Mantralay D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Chhattisgarh. ^ PETITIONERS 2. The Director General of Police, Police Head Quarters Raipur. 3. State of Madhya Pradesh, Through : Secretary, Home (Police) Department Vallabh Bhavan, Bhopal, 6i--V- 4. Commandant, II Battalion, Chhattisgarh Armed Police Sakari, Bilaspur. 5. Deputy Superitendent Police, Range Motor Transport Workshop, Police Line, Bilaspur. 6. District Treasury Officer, Collectorate Bilaspur. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT/WRITS, QSDER/ORDERS AND DIRECTION/DIREGTIONS. sn^i'^r ftw^sntn ^i-iiqf .er^n ^T^ •*l]<llifl<<, »Til<ns, isidi^iy .....W.»P....,.1."?83....... SIR^'S-RnSR'gfFtT '*l<<lfl--i1l 'qi"?ff'? TS^fs ^? aifiW 31!^ 4.10.2001 t He.P.K.C.Tiwari for tt^e petit^oner* The gcisvance o£ the to the entltlanent of salaty eontends that vlolation of in the matter aad there£or< by the Hic^i Court • On the ing for the state submits come within the purvisw o£| trative Tribunal. Shri Tiwfrri cases this court has issueB also should be entertainedi In ay view entitlemenj the condition o£ service. entertain ao doubt ia my be examlaed by the State state that some time befod' buaal was aot jEunctioning at Raipur and in £act nanst have been traftsferred -J- ^n-lt petitioner is relatable and al loiyance. Mr .Tiwar i fundamental right is involved •,this pstitl.on should be examined ifither hand, Mr.Kesharwani appear- jcbat clearly this matter should jurisdiction of State Adminis- further sufcmlts that in slmilar notiees and therefore this case by this Court, jt of salary and allowance is also |If that be so, priraa facie , I seliBd that this matter can and shouldl Aldmln.lstrative Tribunal, I niay the State Admlnistrative Trl- |but thesame is now functioning petitlons pertaining toservlces Administrative Tribanal. toSltate without expressing a4y opinion on merlt I am o£ the 3!1^?T^ fewsn^i •s^ah'. gf??' an^r TR^ ('^t^?) cbl^i^ll-l 'WRff 'S fStZT <ra|<-^l< ^; sif^rqai^! view that this petitioa ^hoiuld be disposed pf with a direction that petitioi^ers should approach the j State Administrative Tribjtlnal at Ralpur. -°*Aa*a-Betition is accbrdingly disposed of. •———&.. Sd/- Ou'ef Justice