IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.10371 of 1993 Date of Decision: December 21, 2009 Tarsem Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Kushaldeep S. Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) In this petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, challenge is to Annexure P-2. Perusal of Annexure P-2 shows that it is a show cause notice issued to the petitioner as to why he be not prematurely retired from service w.e.f. 31.8.1993. Learned counsel for the respondents has pointed out that operation of the order had been stayed vide Order dated 30.8.1993 and CWP No.10371 of 1993 [2] therefore, the matter would have been rendered infructuous as the petitioner, in the meantime, would have retired after completing the service. The petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (AJAI LAMBA) December 21, 2009 JUDGE avin