Petitioner(s) '^. ^. -^--^: HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR DIVISIONBENCH HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEVGUPTA, C.J. & KON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMARSINHA, J. V^.P. (C) No.2518of 2008 M/S JAIN TUBEWELLS, 22-B, RAVI NAGAR, JEEVAN BiMA MARG, RAIPUR (CG) Throughtheir partners namely: (1) MAHAVEERCHANDJAIN, S/0 SHRI PHOOL CHAND JAIN, Aged about 45 years, R/0 Rajendra Ward, PO - Mungeli, Dist- Bilaspur (CG> _......__\_.: (2) SUBHASH CHAND JAIN, S/0 SHRI RANULAL JAIN, Aged about 34 years, R/0 22-B Ravi Nagar Jeevan Bima Marg, Raipur (CG) (3) SURESH KUMAR JAIN, S/OSHRIRANU LALJAIN, Aged about 32 years, R/0 Rajendra Ward, PO-Mungeli, Dist.- Bilaspur (CG) Versus 1. THE STATE OF CHHATTiSGARH, Through - The Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. BHAVAN, Raipur. 2. THE ENGINEER-iN-CHIEF, Public Health Engineering Department, Chhattisgarh, H.Q.-Civil Lines, Raipur. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, Pubjic Health Department, Rajpur Zone, Raipur (C.G.) 4 THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, Public Health Engineering, Circle, Raipur (C.G.) 5 THE EXECUTIVEENG1NEER, Public Health Engineering, Division, Raipur (C.G.) 6, ONKESH CHANDRAVANSH!, Age About—45 Years (Other details not Eii ,:S^ ^.:S^i li known to the petitioner) Designation - Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering, Division, R3ipur(C.G.) WR1T PET1TION UNDERARTICLE226/227 OF THE CONST1TUTIONQF INDIA Shri H.C. Shukla,learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Additional Advocate General for the State/respondents No. 1 to5. ORDER >nd (2na September, 2008) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri H.C. Shukla, leamed counsel for the petitioner, in view of the award of contract by respondents No.1 to 5 in favour of as many as 10 tenderers during the pe'ndency of the writ petition, requiring substantial amendments in the wit petition by impleading those successful tenderers as respondents, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty of filing another writ petition for the reliefs sought by the petitioner in this writ petition arid other anciilary reliefs by impleading all the necessary parties as respondents. 2. Permission granted. 3. Wrth the above liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- GhiefJustice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge subbu !i«!::ll •^'•"-.'.!'^--^:••V -Wt:ssaSS