IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 6650 of 2002 Between: Kadari Srinivas, S/o. Dharmaiah, R/o. H.No. 1-7-70, Market Road, Metpalli, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar District. 2 Circle Inspector of Police, Metpalli, Karimnagar District. 3 Sub Inspector of Police, Metpalli, Karimnagar District. 4 Kadari Dharmaiah, S/o. Narsaiah, R/o. H.No. 1-7-71, Metpalli, Karimnagar District. 5 Kadari Narsaiah, S/o. Dharmaiah, R/o. 15-21-39/1, Balaji Nagar, Kukatpalli, Hyderabad - 072. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ more particularly WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents 1 to 3 in interfering in the civil dispute by forcibly dispossessing the petitioner from the house bearing No. 1-7-70 situate at Market Road, Metpalli in Karimnagar District, during the pendency of the suit in O.S. No. 64/2001 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Metpalli in Karimnagar District as arbitrary, bad, illegal and to set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.C.RAMESH SAGAR Counsel for the RespondentsGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed seeking a declaration that the alleged action of the respondents 1 to 3 in interfering with the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the respondents 4 and 5, which are the subject-matter of O.S.No.64 of 2001 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Metpalli, Karimnagar District. 2. This Court while directing Rule Nisi by order, dated 11-04-2002, directed the respondents 2 and 3 not to dispossess the petitioner and his family members from the house in question. Despite notice, no counter-affidavit is filed by the respondents and the said order continued to be in operation all through. 3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and keeping in view that the civil suit relating to the very same property is pending on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Metpalli, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of the said property in any manner whatsoever, without following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ (G. ROHINI, J) 03rd February, 2009. Tsy To 1 The Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar District. 2 The Circle Inspector of Police, Metpalli, Karimnagar District. 3 The Sub Inspector of Police, Metpalli, Karimnagar District. 4 Two CCs 5 Two CD Copies