IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 6265 of 2009. [O&M] Date of Decision: 30th November, 2009. Sanjay Mishra & Anr. Petitioners through Mr. Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate Versus Jasbir Kaur & Ors. Respondents through Mr. G.S.Bawa, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) This Revision Petition has been directed by the petitioner – tenant against the order dated 29.09.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Chandigarh, whereby provisional rent has been assessed and the petitioners have been directed to tender the same w.e.f. 1.2.2005 @ Rs.1800/- per month. While issuing notice of motion, it was directed that the petitioner shall be required to tender the rent with effect from March, 2009 onwards only. The afore-stated rent has been tendered by the petitioners. During the course of hearing, petitioner No. 1 has made a statement on oath that both the petitioners shall vacate the demised premises on or before 30th June, 2011. He has further undertaken to pay the future monthly rent by the 10th day of every calendar month. The afore-stated undertaking given by the petitioners is acceptable to counsel for respondents No. 1 and 2, who have further agreed not to press for the remaining arrears of rent for the period prior to March, 2009. In this view of the matter, the revision petition is partly allowed and the impugned order dated 29.9.2009 is modified to the extent that the petitioners shall not be required to tender the arrears of rent for the period prior to March, 2009 provided that they abide by the undertaking given before this Court. Both the petitioners are directed to file their respective affidavit before the Rent Controller, Chandigarh within a period of two weeks to the effect that they shall vacate and hand-over the vacant possession of the demised premises to respondent No. 2 on or before 30th June, 2011. They shall further undertake that the monthly rent @ Rs.1800/- shall be paid on or before the 10th day of every calendar month. As soon as the afore-stated undertaking is given by the petitioners, respondents No. 1 and 2 agree to withdraw the eviction petition as having become infructuous. It is made clear that if the petitioners default in paying the monthly rent, they shall be liable to be evicted from the demised premises. The petitioners have agreed to pay the future rent either in cash against receipt or by way of Demand Draft. The revision petition is accordingly disposed of. Dasti. November 30, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE