( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2214 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2214 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2214 OF 2009 Ms.Saima Masood Khan & Anr. .. Applicants V/s State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.Sudatta J.Patil i/by Mr.Kedar J.Patil for Applicants. Mr.H.J.Dedhia, APP for the State. CORAM : R.G.KETKAR, J. CORAM : R.G.KETKAR, J. CORAM : R.G.KETKAR, J. (Vacation Judge) (Vacation Judge) (Vacation Judge) DATE : 22ND MAY, 2009. DATE : 22ND MAY, 2009. DATE : 22ND MAY, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Mr.Patil, the learned Counsel for the Applicants does not press this application on behalf of the Applicant No.2 - Jaising Bandu Patil as he was already arrested and subsequently released on bail. Applicant No.1 - Ms.Saima Masood Khan alongwith Jaising Bandu Patil have been alleged to have committed the offences punishiable u/s.381, 417, 468, 511 read with section 34 IPC, in connection with C.R.No.3143 of 2009 registered with Pimpri Police Station. It is submitted that the main accused viz.Jaising Bandu Patil, pending this application, was arrested and was subsequently released on bail. As far as Applicant No.1 - Ms.Saima is concerned, she is a student. 2. Opposing this application, Mr.Nivruti Vishwanath Avhad, PSI attached to Anti Dacoity Cell, Crime Branch, Pune has made an affidavit on May 20, 2009. In ( 2 ) paragraph No.6 thereof it is set out that the custody of Applicant No.1 is required to ascertain since when Applicant No.2 is helping her and providing blank answer sheets, and to ascertain whether there are any more students or any staff members of the college are involved in this racket. It is further stated in the affidavit that since no police custody of the Applicant No.1 is given, her handwriting specimen is required to be taken for further investigation purpose. 3. In my view, the ends of justice would be met if the Applicant No.1 is enlarged on bail as the main accused has already been released on bail. Hence the following order:- ORDER (i) Applicant No.1 - Ms.Saima Masood Khan, in the event of her arrest in connection with C.R.No.3143 of 2009 registered with Pimpri Police Station, District Pune, be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R.Bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount, subject to the following conditions. (ii) Applicant No.1 shall not influence the prosecution evidence in any manner whatsoever. (iii) Applicant No.1 shall attend the Court as and when the matter is fixed. (iv) Applicant No.1 shall co-operate with the police and report to the Anti Dacoity Cell, Pune on every Monday & Friday at any time between 9.00 a.m. and 12.00 a.m.till filing of the chargesheet. 4. Application stands disposed of in above terms. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (R.G.KETKAR, J.)