IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6864 of 2010 HARDEO PODDAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.2.2010 Heard Mr. Pramod Miishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ansarul Haque, learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case instituted under section 25(1- B) A and 35 of the Arms Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that according to the prosecution case only one gun is said to have been recovered and for that three persons have been made accused. According to him recovery of gun is not from the conscious possession of the petitioner and the petitioner is in judicial custody since 21.9.2009. It has further been stated that the petitioner is a man of fair antecedent. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M, Birpur, Dist. Supaul in Nirmali P.S. case no. 55 of 2008, subject to the condition that one of the bailors must be either Govt. servant or his family member. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) M.Rahman