1 caf3608 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3608 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1410 OF 2010 M/s.Lacon India Ltd. ...Applicant vs. Maharashtra State Electricity Board ...Respondent Ms Pratibha Boarade i/b Mr.A.S.Rao for the applicant Ms A.R.S.Baxi for the respondent no.1 CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : JULY 25, 2011 P.C.: 1 The learned counsel for the applicant seeks time on the ground that an application made by the applicant for modification of the ad-interim order dated 6th October 2010 is pending. Time cannot be granted as now this application is for final hearing for consideration of interim relief. 2 In a suit filed by the respondent-electricity board, there is a money decree passed against the applicant. Interest granted is only at the rate of 6% from the date of the suit. 3 As the impugned decree is a money decree, the applicant will have to deposit entire decretal amount. The applicant is a limited company. Hence, no departure can be made with the normal rule requiring deposit of the decretal amount as a 2 caf3608 condition for grant of stay. However, sufficient time deserves to be granted to the applicant to deposit the amount. Accordingly, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b) subject to condition that the applicant will deposit the entire decretal amount with the Trial Court within a period of three months from today. If the amount is not deposited within stipulated time, stay will stand vacated without further reference to the Court. As and when the amount is deposited, the Trial Court will permit the respondent to withdraw the said amount subject to furnishing security for the said amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. There will be no order as to costs. JUDGE