IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 18TH JULY 2008 / 27TH ASHADHA 1930 W.P(C).No. 21778 of 2008(P) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- ASHWIN JOSE, 8TH SEMESTER STUDENT, COMPUTER SCIENCE, GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING COLLEGE, KANNUR, MANGATTUPARAMBA P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE KANNUR UNIVERSITY, MANGATTUPARAMBA, KANNUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR 2. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, THE KANNUR UNIVERSITY, MANGATTUPARAMBA, KANNUR. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, THE KANNUR UNIVERSITY, MANGATTUPARAMBA, KANNUR. 4. THE CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS, DEPT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION, B-TECH EXAMINATIONS, THE KANNUR UNIVERSITY, MANGATTUPARAMBA, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI. M. SASINDRAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 21778 OF 2008 P = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 18th day of July 2008 J U D G M E N T By submitting Ext. P3 application to the respondent University, petitioner sought revaluation of 4 papers of the 6th semester B. Tech examination, mentioned therein. The prayer of the petitioner is that the revaluation sought for by him be expedited. Learned counsel for the University on the other hand submits that the last date for submitting application for revaluation was 10.7.2007 and therefore, they cannot be accused of having committed any delay in the matter. 2. True, as submitted by the counsel for the University since the last date was 10.7.2007 the University cannot be faulted on the ground that it has caused any delay in revaluing the answer papers as sought for by the petitioner, but however, having regard to the fact that in matters of revaluation an expeditious completion is called for, I direct that the University shall complete the revaluation W.P.(C) No. 21778 OF 2008 -2- sought for by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, provided the application by the petitioner is otherwise in order. 3. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the respondent University for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-