IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 10TH JULY 2008 / 19TH ASHADHA 1930 W.P(C).No. 20716 of 2008(N) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------- N.V.NISHA, AGED 30, W/O.SUDHEER, KIZHAKKEKARA HOUSE, SHORNUR - 1. BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNA MENON SRI.M.JITHESH MENON RESPONDENTS: -------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD. 3. T.M.MOHAMMEDKUTTY, MANAGING PARTNER, WESTAR CLASSIC, PULAMANTHOLE P.O., PERINTHALMANNA. 4. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SMT. K.R. DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 20716 OF 2008 (N) = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 10th day of July 2008 J U D G M E N T Heard the counsel for the petitioner and also the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent. 2. The challenge in this writ petition is against Ext. P2. On facts it is seen that the 3rd respondent had applied for variation of timing and that was rejected by the 1st respondent. He filed an appeal before the Tribunal which was allowed by Ext. P2 directing that variation be granted subject to settlement of timing. 3. Though the challenge in this writ petition is against Ext. P2 order as such, the learned counsel for the petitioner now confines his prayer to a direction to the 2nd respondent requiring it to issue notice to him and also consider his objections as well at the time when settlement of timing is effected in pursuance to Ext. P2. To this request the 3rd respondent has no objection. 4. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing that it will be open to the petitioner to file his objections to W.P.(C) No.20716/2008 (N) -2- the settlement of timing consequent to Ext. P2 order obtained by the 3rd respondent in which case, his objections will also be considered with notice to him as and when the timing of the 3rd respondent is settled by the 2nd respondent. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-