IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 5496 of 2010 Date of decision: 29.4.2011 Pardeep Rana … Petitioner versus Haryana Urban Development Authority … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Manish Bansal, Advocate, for the respondent-HUDA ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit for declaration and injunction. He did not get any ad-interim relief in his application under Section 39, rules 1 and 2, Code of Civil Procedure. Hence, the present revision by him. Petitioner's case is that he is owner of plot No. 1723/P measuring 299 sq.meters with dimension 13 x 23 meters. After approval of the building plan, he raised construction. DPC certificate had also been issued. The construction is now upto roof level. HUDA is adamant to reduce the area to 276 sq.meters, i.e. 12 x 23 meters on the ground that this pocket relates to the plots of 14 marlas with the plea that the dimension of 13 m x 23 m was given due to inadvertence. Petitioner claims that the shortening of the area affects his construction and as such, demolition is to take place for no fault of his. Heard. The main stress of the counsel for the petitioner is that if the area measuring 1 x 23 meters is reduced, it attracts demolition of the construction which the petitioner has already raised. However, in my view, C.R. No. 5496 of 2010 -2- this issue can only be gone into during the course of evidence led by the parties. Accordingly, the trial Court is directed to decide the suit within six months and for this, the dates be given in such a manner that the suit can be decided within the said period. However, during the pendency of the suit, the parties are directed to maintain status-quo. Any observation made herein shall not be construed to be an expression on the merits of the case. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. April 29, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE