C.R. No. 7809 of 2011 (O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 7809 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 19, 2011 Ashok Kumar .................................................... Petitioner Versus Om Parkash and another .............................. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Sarju Puri, Advocate for the petitioner. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Challenge is to the order dated 8.12.2011 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), SBS Nagar, whereby the application filed by the defendants for changing the Local Commissioner has been dismissed. Shri Vikas Narad, Advocate, was appointed as Local Commissioner to record the statement of witnesses at Allahabad. The objection raised was that he was an earlier associate with Advocate R.C.Sareen and D.B.Bhalla, Advocate appearing for the plaintiffs. This objection is liable C.R. No. 7809 of 2011 (O&M) [ 2 ] to be rejected as in the letter dated 13.10.2011 issued by the learned District & Sessions Judge-cum-Chairman, District Legal Services Authority, Shri Vikas Narad is on the panel of Advocates to be appointed as Commissioners in terms of Order 18 Rule 4(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure. In view of this, no prejudice will be caused to the defendants if Shri Vikas Narad, Advocate records the statement of the witnesses as Local Commissioner in Allahabad. No ground to interfere in the order dated 8.12.2011 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), SBS Nagar, is made out. Civil Revision is dismissed. 19.12.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE