IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40168 of 2008 CHANO YADAV S/O GANGA YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BISHANPUR, P.S. SUPAUL, DISTRICT- Supaul -------------------- PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR------ OPPOSTE PARTY ----------- 2 20.10.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is one of the accused in relation to Supaul P. S. Case No. 69 of 2008 for the offence under sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 326, 307, and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that it is a matter where for one incidence two cases one by the petitioner and other by the informant of the present case for the dispute between the parties over a piece and parcel of land has been filed. Even according to the FIR that except being named in the FIR the petitioner has not been attributed with any substantive act. The allegation of assault by sharp cutting weapon is against co-accused. In fact, the petitioner has already been on the receiving end and he was arrested from hospital while under going treatment. In the totality of the facts as well as the period already undergone, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 69 of 2008. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)