€€2yav? IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR . Ra%o /201o Ashok Kumar Shrivastava S/ o.Late Shri Ramanuj Pras‘ad Shrivastava, aged about 4O years, R/o. Kenabandh, Ambikapur, P.S. Ambikapur, Dist. Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS : . State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary Tribal welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal welfare Department Ambikapur Surguja, Surguja (C.G.) /. 2 TICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION NCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT, JUSTICE IN THE MATTER AT w.P.(syNo PETITIONER RESPONDENTS / 1 WRIT PETITION UNDER AR OF INDIA FOR ISSUA DIRECTIONL ORDER TO DO WW, m, WW W m zoo NMSJNMOWJo ‘amm (W) WWW wmm mmm WWW fs‘a‘h&w‘Er< $aifdwném hrivastava J. SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan 02-08-2010 for the petitioner. Shri Bhupendra Singh, counse Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel La advance copy. Heard. er for the State/respondents on 2i Learned counsei appearing ior the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitied to benefit of two advance increments on account of he having passed B.Trl. examination before his appointment at his own cost. It is submitted that the issue irivoived in the present petition is no longer res integra and the same has been finaliy decided by the Hon’bie Supreme Court in the case of Ashe Saxena vs. State of MP. & 013., 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59. it is further submitted that this Court has atso taken a , similar View in his orc er dated 06-02-2009 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner further draws attention of this Court to order datec 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeai No.124 of 2009, wherein reiying upor the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) and the order passed bythis Court in another Writ Appeal No.8712009, directions have been issued for consideration of the case for grant of two advance increments as pe’r t circular dated 21-09-1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification ofthe facts pleaded in the petition. Learned counsel for the resmndentsrsubmits that case of the , petitioner would also be considered on the same lines. li\ l /r’ i l / gamers, {m info —-'-Is:< 147—2/2010 —1,oo,ooo. WWW?@ANWM0W m -mm<¥iaw> mmw mm mrf§rgR mmm $at'fawm In view of the statement made l above, this petition is finauy disposed of with a direction to the re ondent authorities to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner for rant of two advance increments as per circuiar dated 21-09-1974 issue by the State of Madhya Pradesim after verification ofthe facts pleaded i the petition within a period of eight weeks from today. “rites“ v ,_ _&‘ Sd/— Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge TUmanQ mw‘m dam: went, {on :irzrhz 44- $11 mat/10w ~1 ,oo,oont