IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8051 of 2011 1. SURESH CHOUDHARY, Son of Arjun Chaudhary, Resident of Village-Balabigha, P.S.-Hisua, District- Nawada. 2. Binod Yadav, Son of Janki Ballabh Yadav, Resident of Village-Dona, P.S.-Hisua, District-Nawada. ………Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opp. Party ----------- 2/ 30.03.2011 Heard the parties. This is the second attempt made on behalf of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail in a criminal prosecution registered under Sections 307/34 and other allied offences under the Indian Penal Code. Prayer for anticipatory bail made on behalf of the petitioners was earlier rejected by a reasoned and speaking order dated 19.04.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 8507 of 2010 (Annexure1). While rejecting the prayer for anticipatory bail, this Court had noticed that the occurrence has taken place on a high way and petitioners are alleged to have assaulted the bus conductor, when he demanded for payment of 2 fare. This Court does not find any good ground for reviewing the previous order passed by this Court rejecting their prayer for anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the petitioners also submits that on close of investigation the police found the case against the petitioners to be true only with respect to bailable offences and they were granted bail by the police. Therefore, in view of ratio laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Bishundeo Sahu Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2011 (1) PLJR 731, the prayer for anticipatory bail made on behalf of the petitioners is not maintainable, and they are obliged to seek regular bail. For the reasons recorded above, the present petition for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected once again. Anjani/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)