IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 26TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 7TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 6304 of 2009(G) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ K.MUHAMMADALI, S/O.KUNHALAN, MADAMBATH HOUSE, P.O.KAREKKAD, VIA.KADAMPUZHA, MALAPPURAM DT. BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SMT.SUDHADEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 6304 OF 2009 (G) ==================== Dated this the 26th day of February, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that by Ext.P1, he applied to the 1st respondent for the issue of a regular permit and that pending consideration of Ext.P1, he also sought a temporary permit by filing Ext.P2. Orders have not been passed on either of the applications and it is with that grievance the writ petition is filed. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, Ext.P1 application for regular permit has been received and is pending, the 1st respondent shall consider the same and pass orders thereon. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 3 months of production of a copy of this judgment. 3. In the meantime, the 2nd respondent shall pass orders on Ext.P2 application for temporary permit, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before 1st and 2nd respondents for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp