1 APPR.174-11-REVN.204-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.204 OF 2011 ---------------------- WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.174 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.204 OF 2011 Shri Sidhappa Rama Patil and 2 others. ..Applicants. Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. .... Mrs.Jyoti Pawar, Advocate h/f. Mr.Ashok T. Gade, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr.P.P. Bhosale, A.P.P. for the State. .... CORAM : A. R. JOSHI, J. DATED : 03RD MAY, 2011. P. C. : CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.204 OF 2011: Heard. Admit. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.174 OF 2011 : 1. So far as the bail application is concerned, reportedly all the appellants/accused Nos.1 to 3 were on bail during pendency of the trial and also during pendency of the appeal before the first Appellate Court. They were initially convicted by order dated 2 APPR.174-11-REVN.204-11 30.4.2008 by J.M.F.C., Gadhinglaj. Applicant Nos.1 & 2 were convicted for offence punishable under Section 326 r/w 34 of IPC and sentenced to suffer SI for three years and to pay fine of Rs.12,000/- each. Applicant Nos.1 & 2 were also convicted for the offence punishable under Section 342 r/w. 34 of IPC and sentenced to suffer SI for two months. Applicant No.3 was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 323 of IPC and sentenced to suffer SI for one month. Reportedly, all the fine amounts imposed against all the applicants were already deposited. 2. Considering the allegations against the applicants and considering that during the trial, they were on bail, present bail application is allowed. All the three applicants/accused shall be released on the same bail as granted during the trial and during the proceedings before the first Appellate Court. However, fresh bonds to be executed before the concerned Sessions Court. 3. With the above directions, Criminal Application for bail is disposed of. (A. R. JOSHI, J.) PPD