1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.435 OF 2009 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.398 OF 2007 IN REVIEW PETITION NO.7 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2717 OF 2003 M/s.Chunilal Mulchand & Co. & Anr. .... Appellants V/s. Valsala Menon ..... Respondent Mr.Shamrao S. Patil, for the appellants. Mr.N.R.Prathan a/w Mr.Wilson Varghese, for the respondent. CORAM :P.B.MAJMUDAR & R.C.CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 13, 2009 P.C. 1. The learned counsel for the appellants states that so far as the appellants are concerned, they are not interested in backing out from the consent terms which were recorded by the learned Single Judge. However, his apprehension is that perhaps the State authorities may launch prosecution against the appellant in case recess hour is curtailed. He submitted that however, at this stage there is nothing to substantiate this apprehension, he is withdrawing this appeal and the appellants will abide by the consent terms and will not harass the respondent-lady by 2 taking out any frivolous proceedings. He submitted that at this stage, he is not pressing this appeal and requested that he may be allowed to revive this appeal in case any proceedings/prosecution is lodged by the State against the appellant. Permission to withdraw this appeal is granted. The appellants shall continue to abide by the order passed by the learned Single Judge in this behalf. 2. Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. ( R.C.CHAVAN, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)