IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.60184-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION:20.11.2006 Baleshwari ..........Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..........Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present:- Shri Kul Bhushan Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri SS Patter, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** Petitioner Baleshwari apprehending her arrest in a non- bailable offence in case FIR No. 573 dated 1.9.2006 under Sections 498- A/406/323/506/34 IPC, registered at Police Station NIT Faridabad, has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner, who is mother-in-law of the complainant, has been falsely implicated in the aforesaid case. The husband of the complainant, who was arrested earlier, has already been released on bail. The dowry articles have also been recovered. Counsel for the petitioner further contends that in view of the order dated 28.9.2006, the petitioner has joined the investigation. This fact has not been disputed by the State Counsel. In view of the above, the interim bail, granted vide order dated 28.9.2006 is made absolute subject to the same terms and conditions. Crl. Misc. No.60184-M of 2006 -2- This bail order shall remain in operation till the investigation culminates into filing of challan under Section 173 Cr.P.C. except for material change in the circumstances. Thereafter the petitioner shall be entitled to the grant of regular bail by the trial Court and the same shall further continue till conclusion of the trial on the conditions to be imposed by the court of competent jurisdiction. Disposed of accordingly. November 20, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) pooja JUDGE