IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.34779 OF 2011 GUDDU SAO, S/O ARJUN SAO, R/O VILLAGE KETAKI MATH, POLICE STATION-DEO, DISTRICT AURANGABAD (BIHAR). …………………PETITIONER. VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR. ………………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 02/ 24.10.2011 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences punishable under Section 144, 427 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 17 of the C.L.A Act as also under Section 3 of the Explosive Substance Act in addition to Section 3 of the Damage of Public Properties Act. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that not only the petitioner is an unnamed accused along with 30 named and 125 to 130 unknown extremists but that as co accused Om Prakash Ram @ Prakash Rabidas with similar allegation had been granted bail by order dated 08.04.2011 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 5707 of 2011. In this regard he would also draw attention of this Court on paragraph no. 10 of the bail 2 application asserting that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforementioned fact that the co-accused Om Prakash Ram whose case stands on same footing had been granted anticipatory bail, this Court would also direct the petitioner namely Guddu Sao to surrender within a period of four weeks from today and if he does so, he would be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Deo Police case No. 120 of 2009 subject to the conditions laid down under Section- 438 (2) Cr. P.C and also subject to the following three conditions:- (i) The two bail bonds will be furnished, one by the Government servant and the other by a close family relative. (ii) The petitioner will remain present in course of trial on each and every day and his absence even for a single day would automatically entail the consequences of cancellation of his bail. 3 (iii) The petitioner, in case, is now made accused in any other criminal case,that would itself lead to cancellation of his bail. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)