RESPGNEENTS Shri Near Singh Sahu Kurud Distt. Dhamtari ( S/o Late Shri Jeavan s)x CG). Tn'bhuwan La! San'a Age about 52 Pasparchhedi, Block Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamatari (CG). : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, VERSUS through Secretary Education Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 3. 2‘ Block Districi Education Education Oflger, Officer, KurudfDhamtari. District Dhami’ari (CG). 4‘ Traawrgg Accmmt & Pensiml Disit; Dhamtari (CG). (WRIT PETITEON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) Present : U). SB: Hall'bie Mr, Saiish K. lnotri l) Sllri Somkant Vanna, Advocate for the petitioners. SmL Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for ihe State. ORAL ORDER (Passed 0i: 26th 0f Febi’imr379 2338) The petitiomers were initially appointed as Assistant Teachers 011 fixed 100/~. Aiier cemplefien Q§qg§9batio¢ the petitioners were Similarly situated employees had approached the Madhya Pradesh State" labalpur. The Tribunal passed the order on State 0fM.P. &. Others). It was lin‘ther held that the said. benefit would be given to all the teachers and they should not be compelled 1'0 benefit individually or collectively. Being aggrieved, the then State of Madhya Pradesh had filed the Special Leave Petition. (Civil) N0. 6892f93 24.08. 1992 pay of RS. granted regular pay scale. Administrative Tribunal, 24.08.1992 in 0A. No. 2745/89 (Madhuk‘ant Yadn and: 56 others Vs. regard to the large financial settle the elaini for the 03.01.1994. inipugning the order dated passed. by the Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Iabalpur in 0A. No. 2745/89. The Hon‘ble Supreme Court aller hearing counsel for the parties, dismissed the Special Leave Petition and having implications, granted one year’s time to arrears without interest vide order dated It was tirrther observed that the intervention would work Govt, Primary School Fusera Block years, Assn. Teacher, Lal, Serve Govt. Primary School approach the Tribunal for similar A i (My n. mlt their fights in agcgrdailce with law. Thiq Order dated 24.08.1992 0A. N0. 274§/1989 m agplicabls to the thg same benefit. Laamed counsel appearing for the petitioners submits thai this Calm while gonsidering the smnc issue in Ram Kumar Sahu and othgrs Vs‘ State Govt of Chhattisgarh and another in Writ Pstition (S) No. 813 of 2007 by order dated l2.02.2007, has granted regular pay scale wef. the Leamed counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit ”ihat this sass is squaraly coveracl by the decision of this Court in the case of Ram Kumar Sahu anii othais Vs. Sfats Govt. of Chhattisgarh and ano’ilisr (Supra). Howsver, the state is a? liberty to varii‘y tho facts of appointmont asto Minibar ihe ease ofnis petitioners are. similar to that of the order dated hi View ofthet this petition is allowed in the same terms i.e. petitioners are entitled to the same relief as was granted by the Madhya Pradesh State Adnnnistrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in 0A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of MP. & others) and subsequently confimied by order dated 03.01.94 passed by the Hon’ble gave Petting (Civil) No. 6392/93. The, by the orders passed by the Tribunal as passed by the Tribunal in petitimzers baing sim§lar1y situated a11d they am acaordingiy entitlgd to date of initial appointment. 12.022007 passed by this martin WP. (S) No. 8:3 0192007 (Supra). Supreme Court in Speoial L petitioners shall he governed well as by the Hon'hle Supreme Court (supra) aceordingly. No order asto costs. Saltu J/n. é”.«.. »' RM” Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge