IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 625 of 2002 (S/B) Mohan Singh …………….. Petitioner Versus State of Bank of India & others …………………Respondents Mr. S.S. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Joshi, learned counsel for the respondents. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Mr. S.S. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ashish Joshi, learned counsel for the respondents. By means of the present writ petition the petitioner has challenged the suspension order dated 03.10.1996 passed by respondent No. 4. Brief facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that the petitioner was working in State Bank of India, Laxman Jhula Road, Rishikesh, Dehradun and according to prosecution story he has committed a serious fraud. The petitioner was called for explanation and he replied it on 25.07.1996 thereafter, the petitioner was suspended on 03.10.1996 with an allegation that the petitioner was involved in the forgery case. The respondents also lodged a supplementary F.I.R. against the petitioner u/s 420, 467, 468 and 471of I.P.C, Police Station Rishikesh, District Dehradun on 16.10.1996. The petitioner has also filed a criminal writ petition No. 1400 of 1999; Mohan Singh Vs. State and others before the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court Challenging the First Information Report which was lodged against the petitioner. 2 After the creation of State of Uttaranchal, the case was transferred from Allahabad High Court to this Court. On 29.06.2002 this Court has passed on order whereby this Court has stayed the operation of the impugned order dated 03.10.1996 passed by respondent No. 4 in the case of Bijendra Singh in writ petition No. 743 of 2002 (S/B) Bijendra Singh Vs. State Bank of India. Both the parties have submitted that the enquiry may be completed. Mr. S.S. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner apprehends that the entire documents and other papers concerning the enquiry will no be made available to him. Suffice to state that the apprehension is misconceived. The respondents shall supply the entire documents relating to the enquiry to the petitioner. The respondents are directed to complete the enquiry within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. The stay order dated 29.06.2002 passed by this Court shall remain in operation till the completion of enquiry or for a period of four months whichever is earlier. Subject to the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of No order as to costs. (Rajesh Tandon) Dt. 13.04.2004 HN