THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No. 9087 OF 2008 Dated: 07-09-2010 Between: Yadavalli Sivannarayana .. Petitioner. And The Superintendent, Prohibition and Excise, O/o Prohibition and Excise, Narasaraopeta, Guntur District and another .. Respondents. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No. 9087 OF 2008 ORDER: This writ petition is directed against notice dated 07-03-2008 issued by the Inspector, Prohibition and Excise, Piduguralla, the 2nd respondent herein. The impugned notice refers to notice dated 28-02- 2008 and states that since that notice was not received, the present notice was issued and if records are not produced before the 2nd respondent, action will be taken as per law. A perusal of the impugned notice does not make it clear as to what for the records are required and what is the nature of the earlier notice issued on 28-02-2008, which was not received by the petitioner. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents also concedes that the notice is as simple as it is. It appears, as there are some allegations against the petitioner, records are being called for, but the impugned notice does not make any such mention. In my opinion, the action of the respondents calling for the records from the petitioner without enumerating as to what records are called for is liable to be deprecated. Therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside and it is accordingly set aside. The writ petition is accordingly allowed. No order as to costs. However, this order will not preclude the respondents from issuing a fresh notice with all the details calling for explanation of the petitioner or the records required by them. C.V.RAMULU, J 07-09-2010 ks