1 S.B. Cr. Bail Application No. 2160/2007 (Kalu Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 20.08.2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. S.S.Dhillon for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, P.P. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and public prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. It appears that the order impugned is dated 24.4.2007 and almost four months have elapsed. By now the trial court must have recorded the statements of some of the witnesses. In the circumstances therefore, it would be appropriate to permit the petitioner to move a fresh bail application before the trial court and the trial court shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law without being influenced by the earlier order passed by the trial court. The bail application is therefore, dismissed. However, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh bail application before the trial court and the trial court shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law without being influenced by the earlier order passed by it. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp