HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURTCHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon'b!e Shri S.R. Nayak, CJ Wnt Petition No^6010^QF 2005 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Versus 6. Chhotelal, S/o, Dauram Kurmi Aged about 57 years, R/o Jharradih, Tahsi! Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) State ofChhattisgarh, Through: Revenue Secretary, Raipur (C.G.) Pressding OfRcer Naib Tahsildar Janjgir (C.G.) Sub-Divisional OfRcer (Revenue) Tahsil Janjgir, Dist. Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) Sanat Kumar, S/o Chhatram Dewangan, aged about 25 years, R/o Baloda, Tahsil Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Laxmidas, S/o late Duldiudas, R/o Javaipur, Tahsil Janjgir, District Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) Managing Director indian Oii Raipur, District Raipur V!P Road near Hotei Babylon (C.G.5 Present: Mr. N.K. Chatterjee, leamed counse! for the petitioner. Mr.Sumesh Eiajaj, iearned Dy. G.A., for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 1ST of December 2005) What is assailsd in ttiis writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is an order made by the second respondent dated 26/07/1989 granting the subject land in favour of the ES!3? -i- father of fifth respondent. Admittedly, without chaltenging that order before the appettate authority the petitioner who claims to have interested in the subject land has approached this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. if the petitioner is aggrieved by the order of second respondent dated 26/07/1989, he can work out his legal remedies by v»ayof appeal as provided under the statute. (2) In that view of the matter, 1 dismiss the writ petifion on ihe ground of non-sxhaustion of altemative stetutory remedy. The contentions raised before this Court are teft open to be agttated before the appettate authority in the event of the petitioner prefemng an appeal in accordance with law. There is no order as to costs. Sd/- Chief Justice S,^ijesl,