IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30386 of 2008 NEPAL MANDAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 25.9.2008 Heard. The deceased-husband of the informant bears criminal antecedents which is clear from the rejection order itself. The allegation is that this petitioner took away the deceased and when he did not return, the lady sent her 11 years old daughter to make enquiry from the petitioner about the deceased. The petitioner allegedly said that he was dead. Some days after a dead body was located and it was found to be that of the husband of the informant. There was no perceptible injury on the dead body. The viscera was preserved. On examination, it was found containing poisonous substance. The contention is that on account of being a notorious criminal there were many persons who were after the deceased and it is true that the petitioner might have taken away the deceased but he went away to unknown places and someone else could have poisoned to death. It is not indicated by any part of the rejection order that it was this petitioner who had administered the poison. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in Bihpur Rail P.S.Case no.51 of 2006. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )