IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.689 of 2010 1. RAM DAS Son of late Dharmachand Das 2. Bachcha Devi wife of Ram Das 3. Bablu Kumar @ Bablu Kumar Mandal son of Ram Das Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 11.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 406, 420, 341, 323, 354, 379, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 (x) of the SC/ST Act. Learned counsel submits that the occurrence has not taken place at the public place. He further submits that it would appear from the F.I.R. that petitioners particularly petitioner no.1 misbehaved with the informant and his wife. He further submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case. Learned counsel further submits that informant is an employee of Mahesh Mandal, against whom petitioner no.1 has filed a case as Raniganj P.S. case no. 10 of 2008 under Sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. He further submits that the informant has filed the instant case at the behest of Mahesh Mandal. Having regard to the facts of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today before the court below in connection with Raniganj P.S. case no. 270 of 2008, petitioner nos. 2 and 3 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal - 2 - Procedure. However, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner no.1, namely Ram Das. His prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected with a direction to surrender before the court below and seek regular bail, which would be disposed of preferably on the same day without being prejudiced by this order. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)