1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No. 374 of 2009 IN Writ Petition No.1396 of 2009 [decided] [Ramrao Mahadeorao Wasu Vs. State of Mah. & ors.] With Letters Patent Appeal No. 375 of 2009 IN Writ Petition No.1405 of 2009 [decided] [Suryakant Haribhau Badkas Vs. State of Mah. & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. M.R. Joharapurkar, Adv., for the appellant. Mr. S.S. Doifode, AGP for respondent nos. 1,2 and 5. ------ CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND F.M. REIS, JJ. DATE : 28th August, 2009. Heard. The recovery in accordance with recovery prescribed for arrears of land revenue under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code is permitted by provisions of Section 98 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. In view of the said provision, read with Section 221 (c) of Land Revenue Code, it is apparent that 2 reliance upon the Judgment of this Court in case of Vidarbha Agro Service Centre, Nandura Vs. State of Mah. & ors. [2007 (4) Mh.L.J. 249] is misconceived. In the circumstances, no case is made out warranting any interference. Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. At this stage, learned Adv. Mr. Joharapurkar for appellant states that the learned Single Judge has continued interim order for a period of six weeks and the same should be continued for a period of four weeks more. In the interest of justice, we continue the said interim order which will cease to operate automatically after the period of four weeks. Judge Judge |Hedau| 3