IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.28053 of 2011 Radha Devi wife of Jitwahan Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2/ 26.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 328, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that there is only circumstantial evidence against the petitioner and she is in custody since 02.08.2011 and at one point in time the Hon’ble Supreme Court had also given interim protection to the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate Railways, Gaya, in connection with Sasaram (Dehri) GRP Case no. 26 of 2004, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and another bailor shall be Rajeshwar Kumar Gupta, son of the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if she is, she shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the 2 trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)