IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.310 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Vasheed @ Sonu S/o Hamid Hussain ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: March 16, 2010 ____________________________________________________________________ Arising out of F.I.R. No.11/2010 u/s 304 of IPC and 25 Arms Act, P.S. Kunda, District Udham Singh Nagar ________________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri M.K. Ray, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State and also perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that Shoeb (deceased), aged about three and half years, was playing with Tamancha. Knowing this fact, the applicant Vasheed tried to snatch the pistol and in that snatching of pistol, the said incident took place by chance. There was no intention or motive of the applicant to commit the said crime. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant-Vasheed @ Sonu be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and on furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar. The bail application is disposed of accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 16.03.2010 RG