CR No.7225 of 2009.doc - 1 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR No.7225 of 2009 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 08.12.2009 **** V.K. Enterprises & another . . . . Petitioners VS. M.L. Goyal and another . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Ms. Kulwant Kaur, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Suvir Sehgal, Advocate for respondents ***** SURYA KANT J.(ORAL) (1). Notice of motion. (2). Mr. Suvir Sehgal, Advocate, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents-landlord. (3). This revision petition is directed against the order dated 25.11.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Chandigarh, whereby, the evidence of the petitioner-tenant has been closed. (4). Learned counsel for the petitioner states that given one opportunity, the petitioner shall produce the remaining evidence at his own risk and responsibility. CR No.7225 of 2009.doc - 2 - (5). In view of the stand taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner and in the interest of justice, the impugned order dated 25.11.2009 is hereby set aside and the learned Rent Controller, Chandigarh is directed to grant one more opportunity to the petitioner to produce the remaining evidence at his own risk and responsibility subject to payment of cost of Rs.2000/- to the respondents-landlord. The parties shall produce the remaining evidence on the date fixed i.e. 17.12.2009. (6). Disposed of. (7). Dasti. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 08.12.2009 vishal shonkar