SS^IaLia C .^[0-Qi^' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. Of2006 PETITIONER ,y ^^ ^w/ -fi^/ /^^y "\ .^y: ^•- ••"' »..<•<'^.'•' J'"' A:^\ \*' .*" f"t't-> \ ~* .*** .A:' °V •" i<sWr'' Hem Lal Patel S/o Shri Jagat Ram Patel, aged about 42 years, occupation service, Assistant Grade 2 posted at Janpad Panchayat Tainnar, resident ofTamnar District Raigarh (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS \a ';«-•• </- 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretaiy , Admit Jati Kalyan Vibhag Department, Mantralay ,D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). .2. The Commissioner Tribal CG, Raipur (CG). 3. CoUector, Raigarh (CG). 4. Pawan Patel, Accountant, Janpad Panchayat Gharghoda Distarict Raigarh (CG). ^<<^^,^^-„„„„„.„„„„.-„„.„^; ,„„„ ^^-.^. C''^ 'nA°<^^VRITPET ON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE G-"' CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .^^v> XI-HC-78 3TI^RT^TR-<i<t] gW3TI^TstlH Roshan/- WH^tl Sh*1|ch 3'sg'^ipiRW, ®Tny*is,Rffiiuy -^rf^^^&^ ''T3'77^/^:^"'" ^ 200 (Ay.P,(4)^.^^-^" Sll^l lacn ('i?il^s«<,<T) ?RiTWHf?tr3n^r petiti<>ner 25.7.2006 Mre. Indira Tripathi, Advocat^ Mr. Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt. Heard. By the instant petition, the dated 6.7.2006 whereby he has Tamnaar to Janpad Panchayat Gha^ The llrst ground of challeng^ consent for his transfer in place of ground of chaltenge is that the II) whereas, at Gharghoda there is f\ Learned counsel for the p already made representation to res therefore, respondent No.3 be accordance with law, to which learnc Having heard learned coun' facts and ciroumstances of the oasel of the case, respondent No.3 is dir the petitioner on 13.7.2006 within a with law after considering all the grie In the meantime, the effect 6.7.2006 (Annexure P-2) in respect With the direction aforesaid, Consequently, M.(W.)P. No. Certified copy as per rules. +i'iiFcf's(1-i tiitic<Tfffst^l'<Fii'tAi< ^a'rf^ti'sn^T for the petitioner. ^dvocate for the State on advance copy. |3etltioner has chaltenged the transfer order |been transferred from Janpad Panchayat jghoda on the ground of mutual transfer. is that the petitioner never gave any mutual fespondent No.4- Pawan Patel. The second is working as Assistant Accountant (AG- |io such post. letitioner submitted that the petitioner has (pondent No.3 against the impugned order, (iirected to decide the representation in (d counsel for the State has no objection. j>el for the parties and having regard to the without expressing any opinion on the merit to deoide the representation made by Iperiod of 30 days from today in accordance jvances raised by the petitioner. & operatlon of the impugned order dated j>fthe petitioner shall remain stayed. (he petition stands disposed of. P872/06 also stands disposed of. dirtected Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Jiidge P.T.O.