THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.28277 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioners are daughters and the 4th respondent is the son of the 3rd respondent. Their father, by name, Vinay Rao, died leaving an item of immovable property i.e. premises bearing No.1-8-522/27/2 to 4, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad. The petitioners claim that respondents 3 and 4 are enjoying that property to their exclusion. It is alleged that the property was given for development by respondents 3 and 4 to the 2nd respondent. The grievance of the petitioners is that the 1st respondent is not taking any steps, though the construction is being made without any valid permission. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the 1st respondent. Even from the averments in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, it is evident that there are disputes between the petitioners, on the one hand, and respondents 3 and 4, on the other hand, in relation to succession, to the property, referred to above. The 1st respondent cannot be expected to deal with such disputes. The petitioners have to approach a competent Court to seek redressal. If any construction is brought into existence, contrary to the provisions of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, the 1st respondent would certainly take the same into account. However, he cannot be dragged into the civil disputes between the petitioners and respondents 3 and 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioners to work out their remedies in a Civil Court. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.23-12-2009. GJ