In the High Court of Judicature at Patna Cr. Misc. No.16148 of 2008 Guddu Kumar Vrs. The State of Bihar & Anr. **** /3/ 08.07.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioner, the State and opposite party no. 2, the complainant. 2. Petitioner is the husband of the complainant and ready to keep his wife with full dignity and owner. It is also apparent from the impugned order passed by the District and Sessions Judge. 3. Considering the facts, the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner, Guddu Kumar, is allowed. He is directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in case of his surrender before the Court concerned within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. 1864 of 2007 (Tr. No. 2772 of 2007) to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, East, Muzaffarpur, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. 4. Opposite party no. 2, the complainant, if willing, she should go and reside with the petitioner. Cp:3/S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J. )