^y^^ ^oy XI-HC—78. *fl<RfIT <»»*1iq» ^ST ^II^Krl^ ^tll<441<o, f®l<ni<rl^< ,....uaCs..)...^.te... ^2003 3TI???T TT^5l (^qt^<^T) <2TT^l^ F^i^ ^T^T^TT^T ^FRW '^ffW^ft^T 3??T^T .PEtlTIONER: RESPQNDENTS: -Versus 1. 2. 3. Sinale Bench: Hon'ble 8-2-2009:- Shri V.R. Tiwari, counsel for the| Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel 'SFTZ?fepfr;T 'RTWff ^f ft^ <P»1^1< ^T ^tfiTH 3?n^5T Santosh Kumar Mishra, S/o Koshal Prasad Mishra, aged about 50 years, presentSy posted and worksng as in- charge Jaiior, Central Jaii, Bjlaspur, District Biiaspur (CG) State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Home, (Jaiis) D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur (CG) ' inspector General (Prison), Chhattisgarh, Ralpur (CG) Superintendent,' Central Jall, Biiaspur, District Bilaspur (CG) 3hri Dhirendra Mishra. J. petitioner. .awyer for the SSate/respondents. p/1, Heard. The petitioner was appointed c|n adhoc basis vlde order of Annexure-' Subsequently, he was appoint^d as Probation Officer and posted at CenfraJ Jail, Bhopal, vide Annexure-p/2 dated 2-11-1984. Thereafter, hte services were regularized vide order d^ted 28-2-1990 (Annexure-P^3). Grievance of the petitioner §sthi from the date of his inJtiai apppintmenti Learned counsel for the petitlo ^i the petltioner was entitled for seniorlty • ler submits that he is not presslng this petltlon ,at' this stage, however, the' tetltioner may be .permltted to nfia.ke a I ,(- XI-HC—78 'S^ "^l^lci^, ®tii<H41<o,f®tdl-y^< *11*1<fll W*<l<s»» "^200 ^TT^T 'CT5T5F (1(5^f35t^T) ^n^T'^T'i^iw •^SH 3TI^T »»^icf) Ban/e ^RTTW ^f^T 3??^l -^ Irepresentatlon before respondent No.2l .|he same within speclfied period. Leamed counsel for the State/ Ipetitloner fiies fresh representation bef lconslciered and decided by the said a^ |the date of receipt of representetion. In vlew of the submisslons of te^ Ipetition is disposed of wlth Iiberty to |before respondent No,2 within a period| [declde the same within a further perio<p representation, iti accordance with law| who' may be further. directed to declde. t-espondents submjts that in case, the l>re respondent No,2, the same shail be tthorlty withln a perlod of 6 weeks from |jned counseJ for the parties, the jiie petitioner to file fresh representation l of 10 days from todlay, who in turn shall of 6 weeks from the date of recelpt of c?»j^f<r!^i^w^i ^f r^<d) <P»t^l< ^3TRm3T7^5T Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge