1 ca3093-10 dmt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3093 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7438 OF 2010 Maj. Pralhad Raghvendra Desai (Retd.). .. Applicant. Vs. The Secretary, Trade, Commerce and Mining Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. S.S. Kulkarni for Applicant. Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Sr. Counsel, with Mr. Kevik Setalwad, Shahid Rizvi, Sachin Chandarana and Ms. Shilpa Joshi i/by M/s. Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co. for Respondent No. 7. Mr. Jaydeep Deo for Respondent No. 9. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U. D. SALVI, JJ. DECEMBER 20, 2010. P.C. We have heard Mr. Kulkarni, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dwarkadas, the learned Senior Counsel for Respondent No. 7. We have also perused the additional affidavit in reply filed by Respondent No. 7 opposing this application for amendment. 2 ca3093-10 2. We have perused the proposed amendments to be caused in Writ Petition No. 7438 of 2010 and we are satisfied that the proposed amendments deserve to be allowed. 3. Hence, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendments be carried out within one week and substitute the petition memo during the said period. 4. Additional affidavit in reply, if any, to be filed by the respondents within three weeks from today. 5. S.O., for four weeks. (U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)