1 3930.08wp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3930 OF 2008 VAIBHAV SUBHASH THAKUR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS ... AGP for Respondents: Mrs. V.A. Shinde. Advocate Mr. Patil Pravin S.for R. No. 2. ... CORAM: S.S. SHINDE, & V.K. JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 8th MAY, 2014 PER COURT : . None appears for the petitioner. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent-Committee, on instructions, makes a statement that, the petitioner’s tribe claim has been validated by the Committee on 27/08/2008. Therefore, he submits that, the petition has become infructuous. 2 3930.08wp 2. Upon perusal of the prayers in the petition it appears that, at the relevant time, tribe claim of the petitioner was pending and writ petition was filed so as to seek urgent orders for declaration of the examination result. In the light of statement of the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent-Committee, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. 3. In case, the petitioner finds that, the statement of the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent-Committee is not as per record, in that case, liberty to the petitioner to revive the prayers in this petition. [ V.K. JADHAV, J.] [ S.S. SHINDE, J.] Tupe/8.5.14