IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM THURSDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2011 / 19TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 3789 of 2011(W) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. AFSAL K.H., PROPRIETOR, M/S.S.A.STORES & PARTNER OF M/S.NEW S.A.STORES, M.G.ROAD, PATTIKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. RESIDING AT KOTTATH HOUSE, PATTIKKAD, THRISSUR. 2. SHAMITHA AFSAL, PARTNER, M/S.NEW S.A.STORES, M.G.ROAD, PATTIKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. RESIDING AT KOTTATH HOUSE, PATTIKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.JAIRAM.V.MENON SRI.P.R.JOSHY RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., REGISTERED OFFICE AT'SIB HOUSE', T.B.ROAD, MISSION QUARTERS, THRISSUR, REP.BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER. 2. THE CHIEF MANAGER/AUTHORIZED OFFICER, SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE, ROUND SOUTH, THRISSUR-680 001. 3. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, G.E.PLAZA, AIRPORT ROAD, YERWADA, PUNE, PIN 411 006, REP.BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER. R1 & 2 BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE,SC,SOUTH INDIAN BANK THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.3789 of 2011 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T ---------------------- On 2.6.2011, when the matter came up for consideration, learned counsel who was holding vakalath for the petitioner had informed this court that he has already relinquished the vakalath. This court noticed that the petitioner has not made any alternate arrangements to pursue this writ petition. However, the matter was adjourned to today. It is further noticed that the petitioners have failed to comply with the stipulations contained in the interim orders issued. 2. Learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 submitted that huge amounts are due from the petitioners as arrears in the loan account. On 2.6.2011 itself this court had clarified that the interim order will not be operative if the petitioners have not complied with those conditions. 3. Today when the matter was taken up, there is no W.P.(C).3789/11 -2- representation for the petitioners. Learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 had submitted that no amount, in compliance of the interim orders, has been paid till date. 4. Under the above mentioned circumstances, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition any further. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. okb