IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21928 of 2011 INDO-HIROSHIMA INSTITUTE OF NURSING THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATION) CUM SECRETARY, NAMELY MUNNOO LAL SON OF LATE BABU LAL, AT SAGUNA MORE, DANAPUR CANTT. P.S. DANAPUR, DISTRICT PATNA. VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR IN CHIEF, HEALTH SERVICES, GOVERNEMNT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. BIHAR NURSES REGISTRATION COUNCIL, THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT, VIKASH BHAWAN, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE REGISTRAR, BIHAR NURSES REGISTRATION COUNCIL, VIKASH BHAWAN, BIHAR, PATNA. For the petitioner : Mr. Ram Chandra Bharti, Advocate. For the Council : Mr. J.P. Karn, Sr. Advocate. For the State : Mr. K.B. Singh, SC-22. ------------------- 02. 09.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the counsel for the Bihar Nurses Registration Council. 2. Petitioner Institute is aggrieved by the order dated 25.11.2011, Annexure-1 whereunder request of the petitioner Institute to admit 40 students of the second list in the Nursing Examination has been rejected on the ground that petitioner Institute was allowed recognition to admit 50 students, against which first list of 50 students was received. Later another list of 50 students was received and 10 students in the two list were common they were allowed to appear in the examination. Candidature of the 40 students of the second list who 2 were not included in the first list was rejected on the ground that before cancelling the admission of the 40 students of the first list the authorities of the Bihar Nurses Registration Council were not informed about the cancellation of the admission of the 40 students included in the first list. 3. The ground taken in the impugned order is quite relevant, as such, I am not inclined to interfere with the same. The writ petition is dismissed. Rajesh/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)