1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.368 of 2006. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, office Memoranda of Coram Court's or Judge's appearances, Court's orders or directions order and Registrar's order. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr.Rajnish Vyas,Adv.for the petitioner. Mr.A.D.Sonak, A.P.P.for the State. CORAM: K.J.ROHEE & C.L.PANGARKAR,JJ. DATE : 4th December, 2006. 1. Heard Mr.Rajnish Vyas, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr.A.D.Sonak, A.P.P. for the State. 2. Deceased Prashant had grievance about the construction under Gharkul Scheme, which was being supervised by the Municipal Council. In that connection, Gopal Mohanlal Kolhapure had threatened him and his father. It seems that deceased Prashant had contacted the officials of the Municipal Council namely Shri Sharma, Shri Awari, Shri Alkari and Shri Chavhan. However, the constriction work was not stopped and it resulted in commission of suicide by Prashant. 2 3. It seems that initially crime No.723/2006 under Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code was registered. However, after the death of Prashant it was substituted by Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. After completion of investigation, charge-sheet was filed against Gopal Mohanlal Kolhapure. 4. It may be noted that Prashant had some grievance against Gopal Mohanlal Kolhapure as well as the officials of the Municipal Council. In that case, he could have instituted civil suit against the Municipal Council and could have obtained injunction against the construction. Instead of doing that, he took the extreme step of committing suicide. We are convinced that no prima-facia case is made against the officials of the Municipal Council. We find no merit in the petition. The same is, therefore, dismissed in limine. JUDGE JUDGE pzc