IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14457 of 2009 SATYENDRA SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.06.2009. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for offences under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that informant and his family were labourers in the field of other petitioner and father in law of the informant had filed a case against the petitioner in the year 1996 being Hayaghat Police Station case no. 16 of 1996. Furthermore, case under the Minimum wages Act was also filed by father in law against the father of the petitioner. It is also submitted that in fact he had filed a complaint before the Sarpanch thereafter the informant side was called by the Sarpanch on 25.1.2009. Consequent thereafter the petitioner has been implicated in this case and even as per the FIR the same has been lodged after delay of 5/6 days. It is also submitted that the medical report also does not support the prosecution case. Petitioner is in custody since 31.1.2009. In the facts of the case, let the petitioner as above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in Hayaghat Police Station case no. 5 of 2009. He would not be absent physically for two consecutive dates till four witnesses are examined in trial. Shashi (S. P. Singh, J.)