IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.839 of 2008 SMT. USHA DEVI Versus VIKRAMA PANDEY ----------- 3 26.11.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner on merits. In the opinion of this Court, when the petitioner did not choose to raise such objection at the time of measurement before the Advocate Commissioner, his effort to assail the same in the Court, has been correctly repelled by the Court below by the impugned order. The Court below has recorded that petitioner had the opportunity and in fact were noticed by the Advocate Commissioner and in fact, the report also contains signature of the Advocates of both the sides. It thus become clear that if the petitioner either by himself or through his counsel did not choose to raise an objection on the point of measurement, such objection raised subsequently at the time of consideration of the report of Advocate Commissioner, was correctly rejected. The confirmation of report of the Pleader Commissioner by the impugned order is valid and would call for no interference by this Court. That being so, this Civil Revision application is wholly misconceived and is hereby dismissed. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) 2