IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO PETITION NO PETITION NO. 1095 OF 2009 1095 OF 2009 1095 OF 2009 Vishnukrupa Sahakari Griharachana Sanstha Mydt Through its Secretary ... Petitioner. Vs. Dilip Balkrishna Wani & Anr ... Respondents. Mr Vilas B. Tapkir, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr S. N. Chandrachood, Advocate for the Respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 06.02. 2009. 06.02. 2009. 06.02. 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners. Perused petition. 2. Having gone through the impugned order and having heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners, no fault can be found with the impugned order and the view taken therein is a reasonable and possible view. No case is made out to show that the concurrent finding of fact is either arbitrary or perverse. 3. In the result, petition is dismissed in limini. No order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, J.) J.) J.)