((-1-)) MST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.225 OF 2007 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.303 OF 2007 Ajay Savla Applicant versus Union of India and others Respondents Mr.Samdani i/by Wadia Ghandy & Co. for applicant Mr.Kunal Chaudhary with Kiran Kandpile for respondents. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 29th June 2007 PC : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. My attention has been invited to the order dated 14th June 2007 passed in Writ Petition No.4300 of 2007 by which the writ petition was allowed to be converted into a Civil Revision Application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant states that the order dated 5th October 2006 passed in Writ Petition No.6846 of 2005 will not apply to the present case in view of Section 10 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised ((-2-)) MST Occupants) Act, 1971. He states that the prayer made by him on 14th June 2007 was made without noticing Section 10 of the said Act of 1971. He states that in view of Section 10 of the said Act of 1971, the only remedy available was by way of a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. He submitted that in view of finality clause incorporated in Section 10, the remedy of revision cannot be availed of. The learned counsel for the respondent fairly states that the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant are correct. In view of this position, the order dated 14th June 2007 is recalled. As a consequence, the office will have to restore the writ petition to its original number i.e. Writ Petition No.4300 of 2007. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant prays for continuation of interim relief. The prayer is opposed by the advocate for the respondent by pointing out that possession of the premises is taken over by the respondents on 2nd June 2007 and as of today only some goods of the applicant are lying in the premises. 3. This Court has granted a limited ad-interim order. The said order cannot be vacated unless ((-3-)) MST the petition is heard on merits. Hence, the said order of ad-interim relief passed on 5th June 2006 will continue to operate for a period of two weeks from today. Civil Application is disposed of. (A.S.OKA, J.)