COCP No.1299 of 2011 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1299 of 2011 (O & M) Date of decision: 29.11.2011 Pala Ram .... Petitioner Versus Sh. Shree Bhagwan Goel ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Hooda, Advocate, for the respondent. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.: (Oral) The grievance of the petitioner, in this petition, is that direction to release the new connection to the petitioner within one month, passed by this Court on March 08, 2011 in CWP No.8948 of 2009, was not being complied with by the respondent. 2. Upon notice having been issued to the respondent, reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent, whereby, it has been stated as under:- “In compliance of the above mentioned order dated 23.08.2011, the petitioner has furnished the requisite bank guarantee equivalent to the amount due to the respondent-Nigam. Thereafter the inspection report of the line by COCP No.1299 of 2011 (O & M) ::2:: Chief Electrical Inspector, Haryana was received in the office of answering respondent on 19.09.2011 and then the connection has been duly released by the XEN M&P Kurukshetra on 21.09.2011. This factual aspect is quite evident from the office letter written by the answering respondent vide its memo No.5395 dated 27.09.2011. The true fair typed copy of the office memo dated 27.09.2011 is attached herewith as Annexure R-1.” 3. In view of the above, no further action is called for in the present petition. Same stands disposed of accordingly. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE November 29, 2011 sukhpreet