... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3304 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3304 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3304 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri Prakash Naik for the Applicant. Ms S.V.Gajare, A.P.P for the State. Ms R.V.Pawar holding for Shri V.G.Mujumdar for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 30, 2006. DATE : NOVEMBER 30, 2006. DATE : NOVEMBER 30, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocate for the Applicant, learned A.P.P for the State and the learned Advocate appearing for the second Respondent. The Advocate for the Applicant has placed on record a xerox copy of an Agreement dated 19th October, 2006 executed by and between the Applicant and the second Respondent. The said Agreement records complete settlement between the parties. The said Agreement also records that the Applicant will withdraw the present Application and the complaint will be withdrawn by the second Respondent. The ... 2 ... learned Advocate for the second Respondent on instruction states that such Agreement has been executed by the parties. The xerox copy of the Agreement is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. In view of the said Agreement, Shri Naik seeks permission to withdraw this Application. Accordingly, Application is disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE