1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2525/2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 2135/2006 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Shri D.V. Tele, AG.P. for petitioner. Shri P.R. Nangare, Advocate for respondents No.1. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J Date : 17th February, 2010. 1 Heard learned A.G.P. and learned counsel representing the claimant. The State seeks to condone delay of 1717 days caused in filing appeal. The State moved copy application in judgment and award in L.A.R. No. 283/1991 on 10/01/2003 though order is dated 22/02/2001. The certified copies were ready for delivery on 27th January, 2003. However, they were not collected and the matter was dragged. The delay though is said to be occasioned on 2 procedural avenue, however, laxity displayed herein above speaks volume about casual approach of the concerned. The delay is not sufficiently explained. 2 Incidentally, with the assistance of the learned A.G.P., I have gone through the award. Two sale instances Exhibits 29 and 30 were considered by the learned judge. Those were for the area of 32 Ares and 13 Ares prior to notification. It is not that the learned judge was excessively influenced by the sale instance of Exhibit 30 but has taken cumulative effect including nature of evidence adduced. On this count also, the finding does not warrant any interference. The application to condone delay is dismissed. 3 No cost. 4 Necessary court fee be refunded. (K.U. CHANDIWAL, J) tsk/ca2525.09