•^ ^Niir' and2. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.No. 1426 of 2005 PetitJQner Chhattjsgarti Dairy Officers -? Association (Regd.No. C.G. State.615) Through the President Shri Ra^esh Shrivastava, Vrilage and Post BMY Charoda. Urta. TehsJI & Dist., Durg (C.G.) Vereus Respondents 1. The State of Chhattisgarh. Through The Prindpai Secretary, AgrtGutture Cooperattve Animal Husbandry & Rsheries cum AgricuJture Production Commissioner, D.K.S. Bhavan. Mantrataya. Raipur 2. The Regishrar, Cooperative Sociefies, State of Chhattisgarh. G.E.Road, Labhandi, Raipur. 3. The Managfng Director, Raipur Dugdh Sangh, B.M.Y. Charoda, Disfrict Durg, The State of M.P., Through the Secretary. Dairy & Animal Husbandry, VaIJabh Bhavan, Bhopal (M.P.) 4. The Registrar, Cooperative Societies. State of M.P. VaUabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP.) 5. M.P. State Cooperative Dairy Federation Ltd. Through the Managing Director,- MPCDF, Dugdh Bhavan, Dugdh Marfl, Habibgunj'. Hopat (M.P.) WRIT PETITION UMDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE C^ISTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'bie Mr. Justjce Satish K. Agnihotri Shri Praveen Das, Advocaie for the pdifioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondente No. 1 Shri P. S. Koshy. Advocate for the respondent No.3. ORDER (Passed on Wre 23"* day of April. 2007) 1. The petitioner/AssocJation has sought for a direction to grant employees of the pefitioner Associatjon. the benefit of recommendation ofthe 5th Pay Commission. sss^aa^s 2. Section ^ read with Secfton 64 of the Chhatt^arh Cooperative Socjeties Act, 1960, clearly provides for determjnation of conditions of emptoyment in Soctety as welt as resoMng any djspute between emptoyer and employee, by the Reglstrar, Cooperatwe Sociefies. 3. The pefitjoner/AssociatJon, wlthout taking recourse to the statutory remedy. availabte to it, has approached to this Court, directly. There is no jnfringement of any fundamental or tegal rtght, which may be considered by this Court in exerdse of its extraordinary iurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 4. In view of the foregoing, this petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. 5. However, liberty is reserved to the petittoner/Association to take recourse to the appropriate forum that may be available to the petitioner. This order will not come in the way of the Registrar or any other concerned authority jn consklering the matter to pass any order, in accordance with law. Thakur Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge