IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17740 of 2009 1. SUDHIR SAHAY @ SUDHIR SAHAY VERMA 2. AKASH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 07.09.2009 Heard both sides. Two petitioners, who are father and son, have applied for anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Section 409 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as per complaint, certain damaged copper wire were handed over to the transport agency owned by the petitioner no.1 for being transported to Delhi. In course of transportation, the damaged copper wire were lost. Petitioner no.1 had reported this matter to the police at Delhi. Thereafter correspondence between the parties ensued. The matter was about to be resolved. In the meantime, the present complaint has been filed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already sacked his employees who are responsible for such negligence. It is further contended that petitioners shall make sincere effort to make good the loss to the complainant. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is persuaded to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of 04 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing 2 bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Complaint case no. C-731 of 2007, Trial No. 2328 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)