C' * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 556/2010 AUTODESK,INC & ANR. Plaintiffs Through Mr. BharatS. Kumar,Advocate versus SRIKANT LIMEYA & ORS. Defendants Tlirough Ms ShivaLakshmi,Advocatewith Mr. Sri Ram Krishna, Adv. for Defendant No.2 to 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT ORDER o/o 11.05.2010 ^A No. 6210/2010 Thisjointapplicationhas been filed for settlementwherebypartieshave resolved their disputes. The terms of settlement are mentioned in paras 2(a) to 2(k). The applicationis supportedby the affidavitof the plaintiffs'constitutedattorneyas well as the affidavitof the authorizedsignatoryof DefendantNos.2to 6. In view of the avermentsand havingregardto the submissionsmade on behalfof ,tliepartiesthe Courtis satisfiedthat applicationdeservesto be allowed,in the interestof ' ; justice. t lA No. 6210/2010 is accordingly allowed. CS rOS^ No. 556/2000 Learnedcounselfor the plaintiffssubmitsthat the DefendantNos.l & 7 may be struck off from the array of parties. In view of the order made today in lA No. 6210/2010,the defendantshave tendereda demand draft for Rs.4 lacs, having regardto S Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified the terms mentionedin para 2(f)(i). It is submittedthat the balancesum of Rs.43 lacs, referredto in para 2(f) and the other avermentsin the application,would be paid to the plaintiffsin the courseofthe day. Let decreebe drawn in terms ofparas 2(a) to 2(k) of lA No. 6210/2010,subjectto the plaintiffsdepositingdifferentialcourt fee inthe sum of Rs.47,05,000/-. The datepreviouslyfixedi.e. 9"' December,2010 is herebycancelled. S. RAVINDRA BHAT,J MAY 11, 2010 1^ mw r\ \o