IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND AUGUST 2006 / 11TH SRAVANA 1928 WP(C).No. 7782 of 2005(B) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ DEVAKI K.R. R/A. PERUMPADAPPIL HOUSE, POST, CHOWENNUR, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PRESENTLY WORKING AS PEON C.M.S. SCHOOL THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.C.VALSALAN SRI.GHOSH YOHANNAN SRI.ANOOP U.R. RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF GENRAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHAVAKKAD. 4. THE MANAGER, CORPORATE MANAGER, C.M.S.SCHOOL, POST THRISSUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 5. THE HEADMISTRESS, SNEHALAYAM, C.S.I. SCHOOL FOR DEAF, KUNNAMKULAM, POST KUNNAMKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.ANTONY DOMINIC SRI.A.M.SHAFFIQUE SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR SRI.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR SMT.PRIYA MAHESH GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.V.LONACHAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/08/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF PERSONAL MEMORANDA OF PETR. APPROVED BY R2 DT. 6/5/98. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT D. 6/8/2003. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF REQUEST MADE BY R4 DT. 13/10/2003 TO R2. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF ORDER DT. 10/10/2003 BY R3. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF ORDER DT. 4/8/2004 BY R2. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF REVISION PETITION FILED BY PETR. BEFORE R1. EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF INTIMATION LETTER DT. 12/1/2005 BY R1. A.K. Basheer, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No. 7782 of 2005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 2nd day of August, 2006. J U D G M E N T Petitioner claims that she is entitled to be promoted and posted as Craft Teacher or Clerk in the school under the management of respondent No.4. According to her, she had been working in the school in question when it was an unaided institution since September 4, 1989. 2. Respondent No.4, the Manager admitted that the petitioner was in service when the school was recognised as an aided institution with effect from August 1, 1997. In the counter affidavit respondent No.4 has further averred that the management has no objection in accommodating the petitioner against a suitable post as and when such a vacancy arises. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the above averment made by respondent No.4 in the counter affidavit, no further orders are necessary. Therefore the Writ Petition is closed recording the statement made by respondent No.4 as above. However it is made clear that respondent No.4 shall be bound to appoint the petitioner only if a suitable post arises to accommodate the petitioner and only if she has got requisite qualifications to hold such a post. A.K. Basheer Judge. an.