IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 259 OF 2004 SHRI RAMCHANDRA OR ROGUNATA ....Petitioners D.GUIMONEM,PILIGAO Versus SHRI RAMCHANDRA A.GARDE AND 24 ....Respondents ORS., Shri M. S. Usgaonkar, Sr. Advocate with Shri Ifitkhar Agha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amrut Kansar, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 12. Coram:- R. M. LODHA, J. Date:- 19th August, 2005 P.C. Heard Mr. Usgaonkar, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner. The concurrent orders passed by the Courts below rejecting the petitioner's prayer for grant of temporary injunction do not suffer from any error of jurisdiction. No case for invocation of Article 227 is made out. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. In view of the dismissal of the writ petition, needless to say that the interim order cannot survive. R. M. LODHA, J.