IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO.1582 OF 2008 (MS) Uttarakhand Power Corporation Ltd. and others. ……….. Petitioners. Versus Electricity Ombudsman and another. ……. …. Respondents. Mr. B.D. Upadhyay, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. V.K. Kohli, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. T.C. Pandey, Advocate for respondent no.2. 23rd June, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. In the light of the order passed on 23rd June, 2009 in Writ Petition No. 1580 (MS) and the facts of the matter being the same, present writ petition is also being disposed of with the following direction: In the interest of justice it is absolutely necessary that the Ombudsman/respondent no.1 may not be restrained to proceed with the other issues. This writ petition is, therefore, being dismissed at this stage with liberty to the petitioner to challenge, in case occasion so arises, the order of the Ombudsman also on the ground of respondent no.2 being held to be a Consumer or not. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 23.06.2009 Rathour