HON’BLE SRI ANIL R.DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WAMP Nos.2555 of 2009 & 2803 of 2009 in WRIT APPEAL NO.1145 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: (Per C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J.) WAMP No.2555 of 2009 has been filed seeking review of order, dated 18-9-2009, in Writ Appeal No.1145 of 2009. WAMP No.2803 of 2009 has been filed for the following relief: “Alternatively to declare/hold/observe that the decision and findings in order dated 24-6-2009 in WPMP No.22970 of 2008 in W.P.No.16430 of 2008 shall not operate as res judicata in any subsequent proceedings or suits”. In our considered view, both these applications are wholly unnecessary and misconceived because by order, dated 18-9-2009, we have rejected the leave application filed by the applicants for leave to file writ appeal against order, dated 24-6-2009, passed by the learned single Judge in WPMP No.22970 of 2008, which was filed by the applicants for their impleadment in Writ Petition No.16430 of 2008 and the said writ petition was disposed of by the time the leave application in the proposed writ appeal came up before this Court for hearing. Subsequently, the applicants filed a separate writ appeal with leave application against the final order passed in Writ Petition No.16430 of 2008 and this Court having allowed the leave application, admitted the Writ Appeal, which is now pending. The apprehension of the applicants that dismissal of the previous leave application by this Court, by order, dated 18-9-2009, may affect their interests in the pending writ appeal is wholly baseless and unfounded. Since the writ appeal is admitted and pending, the applicants are entitled to pursue the same on merits notwithstanding the fact that order, dated 24-6-2009, passed by the learned single Judge dismissing the applicants’ application for impleadment has become final. Subject to the above observations, these two applications are dismissed. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ., C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J., Dt.16-11-2009 MNR