1 fa1725.03.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APEAL NO. 1725 OF 2003 Shri Manilal Vahana @ Manilal Dajibhai Patel .. Appellant. V/s. Smt. Chamardiben Mohanbhai Patel & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr. Ajay Varma i/by H.E. Palwe for the Appellant. Mrs. Teja Katdare for the Respondents. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 1ST SEPTEMBER, 2010. P.C. 1. During the pendency of this appeal the legal heirs of the appellant- defendant and the plaintiff No.2 have been brought on record and the parties have negotiated for an amicable settlement. They have arrived at a settlement and terms and conditions of the settlement have been reduced in writing in the form of “Consent Terms” dated 23-7-2010. Both the parties have signed the consent terms before a Notary and the consent terms have been placed before us are marked “X” for identification. 2. Shri Dhanshuh Manilal Patel representing the legal heirs of defendant-appellant and Shri Prakash Mohanlal Patel representing plaintiffs 2 fa1725.03.sxw are present before us and they have verified the consent terms. Undoubtedly, both the parties shall be bound by the consent terms which in our opinion appear to be just, fair and reasonable. 3 The learned counsel for the parties therefore, pray for a decree to be issued in terms of the consent terms and more particularly paragraphs 3 to 8. 4. Hence the appeal is allowed in terms of consent terms and the Registry is directed to issue a decree accordingly. (A.A.SAYED,J.) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.)