IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1931 RP.No. 1050 of 2009(B) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.27528/2006 Dated 24/08/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- REHNA N.P., W/O. UNNIKRISHNAN E.G., L-4/24,”BINDU”, MALAPARAMBA HOUSING COLONY, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL V.MOHAMMED RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GENERAL EDUCATION DEPT. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE. 4. THE MANAGER, VADAKKUMBAD SECONDARY SCHOOL, PALERI, PALERI TOWN P.O., KOZHIKODE. 5. SREELESH, KADUKKAMKUZHIYIL P.O., PALERI, VIA-KUTTIADI, KOZHIKODE. SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI MUHAMOOD T.T THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Review Petition No.1050/2009 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 24th day of November, 2009 O R D E R This Review Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking for a modification of the direction for re-hearing of the appeal which according to the Review Petitioner is not required. It is admitted that the appeal was heard only on 19/10/2006. It is in those circumstances, this Court directed the Director of Public Instruction to re-hear the matter. There is no illegality in the same. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the parties may rely upon fresh materials before the Director of Public Instruction which will prejudice her. If such fresh materials are relied upon by the parties, it is for the authority concerned to consider the objection, if any, raised by the Review Petitioner. Therefore, the Review Petition is dismissed No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms