IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FA No.122 of 2007 JITENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA @ KU Versus SHANKAR KUMAR AGARWAL ----------- 14. 21.09.2010 Heard learned counsel Sri Rupak Kumar, appearing on behalf of the appellant and Sri Avinash Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent on the Interlocutory Application No. 8163 of 2010. This interlocutory application has been filed jointly by the appellant and the respondent under Order XXIII Rule III of the Code of Civil Procedure for compromising the suit. The parties have signed the compromise application and the learned counsels appearing for the parties have also signed. No defect has been pointed out by the office. Accordingly, I find that the compromise is lawful and the suit has fully been adjusted between the parties because of the compromise. In view of the fact this appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise. Let the decree be prepared in terms of the compromise and the compromise application i.e. I.A. no. 8163 of 2010 shall form part of the decree. S.S. ( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J. )