IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 25TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 3RD ASWINA 1929 WP(C).No. 15128 of 2007(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ REJOY, CHEERAN HOUSE, NEDUPUZHA, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. 3. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. BY G.P.SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC.NO.15128/2007 APPENDIX PETITIONER's EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DTD 16.8.2006. EXT.P2 COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DTD 9.5.2006. EXT.P3 COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM DTD 16.10.2006. EXT.P4 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN MVAA.NO.586/2006 DTD 5.1.2007. /TRUE COPY cl ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------------ W.P.(C).NO.15128 OF 2007-A ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 25th day of September, 2007. JUDGMENT By Ext.P1, the application for temporary permit submitted by the petitioner was rejected and that was confirmed by the Tribunal in Ext.P4. Now what is sought for by the petitioner is that fresh application, if made, should be considered dehors Exts.P1 and P4. The learned Government Pleader points out that the route is a notified route and that the request made by the petitioner cannot be considered. If that be so, no useful purpose will be served by issuing any direction. The writ petition is, therefore, fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. cl W.P.(C)NO. . 2 W.P.(C)NO. . 3