IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2444 of 2010 1. ARCHANA KUMARI W/O SRI MADHU THAKUR R/O VILL- DHOBAGAMA, P.S- PUSA, DISTT- SAMASTIPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR, I.C.D.S BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, DARBHANGA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SAMASTIPUR 5. THE DISTRICT PROGRAM OFFICER, SAMASTIPUR 6. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, PUSA BLOCK, DISTT- SAMASTIPUR 7. THE UP-MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ DHOBAGAMA BLOCK- PUSA, DISTT- SAMASTIPUR 8. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ DHOBAGAMA, BLOCK-PUSA, DISTT- SAMASTIPUR ----------- For the Petitioner: Mr Dhiren dra Kumar (Munna), Advocate For the State : G.A. 7 ----- 2. 19.02.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. Learned Counsel submits that he has already preferred Appeal No. 34/2009 against the order of termination dated 9.11.2009 from the post of Anganwari Sevika. It is alleged that the order of termination is in violation of principles of natural justice, placing reliance on a Division Bench judgement in 2004(2) PLJR 833 as also the government instruction dated 25.7.2008 vesting power for removal in the District Programme Officer, appeal against which lies before the District Magistrate. He submits that consequent to the termination during pendency of the appeal fresh appointments are proposed. Let the appeal itself be disposed off after hearing all concerned preferably within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. If the petitioner prefers any application for interim relief pending disposal of the appeal by the Commissioner, this Court requires the interim application to be disposed by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt/presentation thereof. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)