IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17561 of 2009 AMIRI RAI, S/O BRAHMDEO RAI, R/O VILLAGE- RIKHAULI, GRAM PANCHAYAT, BHASHAR MACHHAHA SOUTH, P.S. DUMRA, DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. -PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR, PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR PATNA. 4. THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, TIRHUT DIVISION, MUZAFFARPUR. 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SITAMARHI. 6. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT RAJ OFFICER, SITAMARHI. 7. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, SITAMARHI. 8. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SADAR, SITAMARHI. 9. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, DUMRA, DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. 10. THE BLOCK PANCHAYAT RAJ OFFICER, DUMRA, DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. 11. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, BHASAR MACHHAHA SOUTH, BLOCK-DUMRA, DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. 12. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, BHASAR MACHHAHA SOUTH, BLOCK-DUMRA, DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. -RESPONDENTS 2 16.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has preferred this writ petition purportedly in public interest seeking action against the Mukhiya and the Panchayat Secretary of a particular Panchayat, namely, Gram Panchayat Raj, Bhasar Machhaha 2 South, Block-Dumra, District-Sitamarhi, respondents no.11 and 12, for several irregularities allegedly committed by them. According to the petitioner, there are reports, such as by Block Panchayat Raj Officer, Dumra, against the aforesaid respondents but no action is being taken. It is not possible for this Court to supervise or take action directly against individuals such as Mukhiya or Panchayat Secretaries. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty that, if so advised, petitioner may approach the District Magistrate, Sitamarhi, with a representation. It is expected that District Magistrate shall consider the said representation and take appropriate action in accordance with law. (Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ.) (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) AAhmad