IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.3558 of 1988 Ashok Kumar Garg & others ...Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.J.N.Gupta, Advocate, for petitioner Nos.3,8,10,12,15,16,18,19,20,22 to 25, 28,29 & 31 to 34. None for the remaining petitioners. Mr.Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Mr.J.N.Gupta has put in appearance for large number of petitioners. The counsel submits that the writ petition is rendenred infructuous as the services of the petitioners have been regularised. The prayer made in the petition was only for regularising their services. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as having been rendered infrucutous. If any of the petitioner is not represented before the court and is still left with any grievance, then he would be at liberty to revive this petition qua him. July 20, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE