Ws& fS^'Ss^'^ 'Sffi' ::",^ .» J^tJ t^^ ..^^•3J-+"" NSIE BE" ^•••- >s f IN THECOURT OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITIONNO ...8tc'.../2006 ^ PETITIONER Karra S/o Shri Late Shri Selhu, Aged about 41- yearworking as Gangman Departmentof P.W.D.R/o Pachpadi, Tah. Sarangarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) ^ '1<S, RESPONDENTS .^- )-"//.C!1^ .--'r'·'^ ^'^^' s^y' ^" VERSUS ^1. State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) ^2. Engineer-in-Chief, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) i. Superintending Engineer, PublicWorks Department, Bilaspur Division, Distt.Bilaspur(C.G.) , 4. Executive Engineer, PubticWorks Department, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRITJKTHE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC. ORANYOTHER DIRECTIONOR ORDERTO DO JUSTICE IN THE IVIATTER —JMJau-yEEETITIONER:- Xl-HC-22 ^ -S^ -^Wir-i^ ^TllWIVc, F<lcilti1< SIT^I^I ft-ijtb sn^i *HICti ^ficT ^ T^ < 3TT^?T 'CRR? Ld.f-^0. 8/0/0fc i!rac:n"9TONi""""""'""""""""""""'TF^ 2ou ' fg^tT"""""""""""""'." 3ITOI TRiIW8f?tI l-3-2006 Shri Sameer Behar, counsel Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt. Application for urgent hearing Heard. f(>rthe petitioner. Advocate for the State. lis aliowed. The petitione.r has filed Constitution of India on the ground his servifces have not been regulariz^d Annexure P-2 and Circulars Anne +l'<I<-f'iTl-f iWRff^ ftT3T (pilWll ^? •3lf:?P:I 3)1^1 this petition under Articles . 226/227 of tfie that even after completing 25 years of service, Counsel for the petitioner sutjmits that the petitioner is serfing as Gangman since more than 25 years. He has fjled copy of Sen/ice Book. He submits that the petitioner is entitled to be regulariz^d under the Gangmen's Service Rules, 1996 <ure P-3 dated* 9-4-2003 and Annexure P-4 .dated 3-9-2002. It is pointed out tl^at representations as per Annexure P-6 v/ere made coilectively and the same is p^nding. It is also pointed out that some persons have beep regularizea. j Learned State counsel pojnte^l out that the representation submitted by the petitioner is pendlna and the same wjill be considered and decided. Having cons'dered ano withcjut case, in the opinion of fhis Court, fo^ direction is giyen to the pet'tioner tc( his grieyances before the responde) or the petition and t.his order, w| representation being filed, the comtjetent the same on its own merits in within three months from the date made clear that if any grievance available under the law. W!ih th.e aforesaid observatiofis, Certified .copy .?s per •'jies. expressing any opinion on the merits of t.he the present, ends of justice wiif be sen/ed if a make a detailed representation afresh raising !|it no: 2 - Engineer-jri-Chief along with a copy Ithin three weeks from today, and on such authonty ofthe respondents shali decide with iaw as early as possibie preferably receipf production of the representation. It is ijemajns, the petitioner may avail the remedy, accotdance cff , this petition stands disposed o"f. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [1TT3 ^fET'!