IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 29TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 10TH PHALGUNA 1929 OP.No. 2586 of 2001(G) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- A.K.ACHUTHANAND, S/O.A.A.KRISHNA KUMAR, ANGALOOR HOUSE, VADAKKETHARA, P.O.PAZHAYANOOR – 680 587, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.DANDAPANI (SR.) RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, TRIVANDRUM. 3. THE COMMISSIONER & SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PERSONNEL & ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (ADVICE-C) DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM. 4. THE SECRETARY, PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPT., KERALA GOVERNMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BENJAMIN PAUL THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ORDER ON C.M.P.NO.4318/2001 IN O.P.NO.2586/2001 G DISMISSED 29/02/2008 SD/-KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER NO.34/87/P&ARD DTD. 17/12/87. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER G.O.NO.7/95/P&ARD DTD. 30/03/95. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 10/03/97 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE HON'BLE CHIEF MINISTER OF KERALA. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DTD. 1/07/98. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 21/09/98 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE HON'BLE CHIEF MINISTER OF KERALA. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 16/11/99 SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE HON'BLE CHIEF MINISTER OF KERALA. EXT.P7: COPY OF THE LETTER NO.A2-6243/2000/L.DIS. DTD. 4/04/2000 ISSUED BY THE DY.DIRECTOR (EDUCATION) THRISSUR. /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss, KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------------- O.P. No. 2586 of 2001 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of February, 2008 JUDGMENT The prayer is for compassionate appointment. It is stated in the counter affidavit that the petitioner, being a nephew, is not eligible for the benefit. It is also submitted that no application in the prescribed form with necessary documents was presented through proper channel. In case the petitioner has still any dispute with regard to the facts stated in the counter affidavit, he may move the first respondent in which case the matter will be considered by the first respondent with notice to the petitioner and appropriate orders in accordance with law will be passed within another three months. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) ahg. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------- O.P.No.2586 of 2001 ----------------------------------- JUDGMENT 29th February, 2008