... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4843 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.4843 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.4843 OF 2005 Pradip Laxman Gaikwad ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Shri. S.R. Mithare for the Applicant. Ms M. M. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. : A.S.OKA, J. : A.S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : AUGUST 02, 2005. : AUGUST 02, 2005. : AUGUST 02, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate appearing for the Applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. By order dated 5th July, 2005 passed by this Court in Criminal Application No.3787 of 2005, all the Applicants in the said Application except the Applicant No.2 were ordered to be enlarged on bail. The case made out in this Application is that the Applicant herein is the Applicant NO.11 in Criminal Application No.3787 of 2005 and in the said Application name of the Applicant herein was incorrectly mentioned as Pradip Ramchandra Gaikwad instead of Pradip Laxman Gaikwad and affidavit to that effect has been filed by the father of the Applicant before the Sessions Court. It is stated in the affidavit that initially name of the Applicant was wrongly mentioned as Pradip Ramchandra Gaikwad in the F.I.R. and later on in the investigation it was revealed that his correct name is Pradip Laxman Gaikwad. 2. In view of the said affidavit, it is necessary to permit the Applicant to amend the Criminal ... 2 ... Application No.3787 of 2005. Hence, the Application is disposed by passing following order: : O R D E R : i) The Applicant is permitted to amend the cause title of Criminal Application No. 3787 of 2005 for correcting the name of Applicant No.11 as Pradip Laxman Gaikwad. ii) Amendment be carried out within a period of one week. After amendment is carried out, necessary correction be carried out in the original order dated 5th July, 2005. After the amendment is carried out, the office is directed to issue amended writ of the order dated 5th July, 2005. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE