I'SVS n S.B. (Senaee Matteri IN THE HIQH €QURTQE iGHHATTISGARKAT BILASPUR (CHHAT'FrSQARHl WRrTPETmON(S)NO.^£'?//2010. PETITIONER: ^ gespondents Piritrain Jagde, son of Dankraxn Jagde, aged about 55 years, working as Upper Division TeaGher, Govt. High Sehool, Matiya (Kasdole), Education District Baloda Bazar, District Raipiir, Chhattisgarh. versus .^V. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Education Bepartnierit, D.K.S.BBawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. •^p/.f^y 3v./w5^y "/.(iy\y ^^ v .C^Q^^ .iy ^2. District Education OfEcer, Education Bistrict BalodaBazar,13istriGtRaipur, Chhattisgarh. ^S. Bloek E^lycation OfBcer, Block Kasdole, District Raipyr, Ghliattisgarh. WE['!'PET?mONyN®ERARTIGLE2260FTHE ©OK^FnjTIONQRlNDIA T IIHCTT SbNrai 'T=T •<ll<<l<>f<l, snil'M'Ko, [qciK-iy ,..U.(2...^?.l:t\is:....^&.u, SII^?!'^^? (1^f;P^*T) an^r qfl |(;-ii4) W 3Tlt?T 9h*fiqi \.t wiiw ^ita aii^r SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITI 32.11.2010 Shri C.J.K.Rao, counsel tor thi Shri Sumesh Bajaj, GA. for tt Counsel for the oarties do n involved in this petition is squarely ofYashwaat Kuinar BharadaJ Vs. Another (2006 (II) MPJR CG.96) & Govt. of Chhattisgarh 8s Another (5 Counsel appearing for the Sta petitioner makes a representation, decided in accordance with law an< this Court in the matter of Yashwan< petitioner. State. jot dispute that the contmversy c|3vered by the order in the matter ])|IiiEiiIcpaI Corporation, Dv.tg & Gopesh Kuinar Verma Vs. The .P.(Sj No. 4130/2005). sjte submits that in the event, the |he same wili be considered and in the light of the decisions of w Kuinar Venaa Vs. The Gowt. of No. 4130/2005) within a period receipt of the representation. In view of the foregoing, nottji the same is accordingly disposed of. It is made clear that this Cout onmerits ot the case and the authoif to decide the representation strl considering all the aspects of the cas|e <fti<ii<n<i1i Ifw?Tif^ffs%i <pn'^i< ^sffinaiii?! scnai (II) MPJR CG.96^ & Gopesh CJihatUsgarb & Another (W.P.(Sj )f four weeks from the date of ing survives in this petition and ~t has not expressed any opinion [ty concemed would be at liberty ;tly in accordance with law. Sd/- pritinkerDi^akar Judge