IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M-28551 of 2008 Date of decision : 19.02.2009 Shaukat Ali @ Ranja ....Petitioner V/s State of Punjab ....Respondent. BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Mohd. Salim, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG Punjab. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to order dated 19.01.2009, petitioner has already joined the investigation. However, this fact is controverted by learned counsel for the State. At the same time, counsel for the State submits that petitioner is not required for custodial interrogation. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner has married to the daughter of the complainant and they are now living together at the moment. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from Head Constable Gurmit Singh, who is present in Court does not dispute this fact. In the facts and circumstances of the case order dated 05.11.2008, passed by this Court granting ad-interim bail to the petitioner is hereby, made absolute, subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. 19.02.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE