IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5405 of 2009 JAI PRAKESH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 28.04.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. Learned Counsel for the State rightly points out from Para 10 of the writ application that on the own pleadings of the petitioner he has already moved before the Appellate Authority constituted by the State Government with regard to issues of appointment of Panchayat Teachers. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the application filed was not exhaustive and leave may be granted to supplement it. If the petitioner has already exercised his option to avail his alternative statutory remedy the writ petition does not lie. No liberty is needed for a litigant to supplement his pleadings reasonably and ion accordance with law. The writ application stands disposed when the matter is now required to be decided by the Appellate Authority in accordance with law. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)