IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH JANUARY 2011 / 22ND POUSHA 1932 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 104 of 2011() ------------------------------------------- CRA.NO.229/1992 OF SECOND ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. CC.NO.58/1991 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT (MOBILE COURT) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ................. REVISION PETITIONER(S): APPELLANT/ACCUSED: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- GANASUNDARI, AGED 61 YEARS, KONATHUVILAI VEEDU, KARODE P.O., UCHAKKADA (VIA), NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (DIST). BY ADV. SRI.SREEJITH V.S. RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. 2. PETER P.ABRAHAM, AGED 57 YEARS, T.C.55/1263 (OLD TC 30/427) PUTHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, ST.SANKAR NAGAR ROAD, KAIMANAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 002. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. V. TEKCHAND R2 BY ADV. SRI.RANJIT BABU THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. ==================== Crl.R.P. No.104 of 2011 ==================== Dated this the 12th day of January, 2011. ORDER The accused in C.C. No. 58 of 1991 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate (Mobile Court), Thiruvananthapuram for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against her concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A No. 325 of 2011 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsels. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. Money, if any, deposited by the revision petitioner before the trial court pursuant to the orders, if any, passed by the superior courts shall be refunded to the revision petitioner/accused. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. Dated this the 12th day of January, 2011. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv