IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5329 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 07-10-2009 Shri Kesho Ram .....Petitioner versus Manish Aggarwal and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.K.S.Jetley, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner-tenant is aggrieved at the order dated 6.5.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Ambala Cantt, whereby Manish Aggarwal, the alleged adopted son of the deceased-landlord and Vishal Aggarwal son of Ram Lal, the alleged nephew of the deceased-landlord, have been ordered to be impleaded as legal representatives of the deceased-landlord on the basis of a registered Will dated 2.7.2003 purported to have been executed in their favour. According to the counsel for the petitioner-tenant, a stranger can not be brought on record without first obtaining probate on the basis of the alleged Will. C.R. No.5329 of 2009 (O&M) 2 Having heard counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any merit in this revision petition. As the impugned order dated 6.5.2009 speaks out, the respondents have been impleaded as legal representatives of the deceased-respondent so that the eviction petition does not abate. However, the petitioner shall be entitled to raise the above noticed question of facts before the Rent Controller, if so advised, on the basis of which an issue shall be framed and finding will be returned. With this observation, this revision petition is dismissed. 07-10-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE