IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2611 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2611 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2611 OF 2007 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1497 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1497 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1497 OF 2007 WITH WITH WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2612 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2612 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2612 OF 2007 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1499 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1499 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1499 OF 2007 The CIT, Mumbai .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Shivparas Yarns Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.R.Ashokan with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for Appellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 15th April, 2008 DATE : 15th April, 2008 DATE : 15th April, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. None appears for the Respondent though served. By these Notices of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 121 days’ delay caused in filing the respective Appeals. For the reasons stated in the affidavits-in-support of the Notices of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay, and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, both the Notices of Motion are made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) respectively. 2. Place both the Appeal on board for admission in the month of July-2008, subject to numbering. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)