IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16674 of 2007 Shaheena Begum, wife of Md. Mansoor Ansari, resident of Mohalla Misscall, P.S. Town Motihari, District East Champaran … Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Collector of the District, Motihari, District East Champaran 3. The District Superintendent of Education, Motihari, District East Champaran 4. The District Education Officer, Motihari, District East Champaran 5. The Block Education Extension Officer, Turkauliya, P.S. Turkauliya, District East Champaran 6. The Block Development Officer, Turkauliya, P.S. Turkauliya, District East Champaran 7. The Panchayat Secretary, Madhopur Madhumalat Panchayat, P.S. Turkauliya, District East Champaran 8. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Madhopur Madhumalat, P.S. Turkauliya, District East Champaran 9. Hasmuddin Dewan, Up-Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Madhopur Madhumalat, P.S. Turkauliya, District East Champaran … Respondents ---------------------------------- 3. 29.9.2011 This case has been listed under the heading “to be mentioned” at the instance of the counsel for the petitioner, who would submit that the order recorded on 2.9.2011 seems to be of some other case, inasmuch as the petitioner had never moved the District Teachers Appellate Authority nor there was any order passed by the authority relating to the case of the petitioner. He would accordingly pray that when the petitioner wanted only to move the District Teachers Appellate Authority, the order recorded on 2.9.2011 needs to be recalled and substituted by according permission to the petitioner to move the concerned District Teachers Appellate Authority. This Court after hearing the parties is satisfied that the order dated 2.9.2011 seems to have been recorded from the 2 batch case in which there was such a direction/ liberty. That being so, the order dated 2.9.2011 is recalled and is substituted by giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate District Teachers Appellate Authority for redressal of her grievance. If the petitioner would file a complaint before the appropriate authority within a period of one month from today, the authority shall decide the matter on merits without non-suiting the petitioner on the ground of limitation, if any, and of course after hearing all the concerned parties. This application is, accordingly, disposed of with the aforementioned liberty. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/