IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND JUNE 2011 / 1ST ASHADHA 1933 WA.No. 737 of 2011() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER DATED 16/02/2011 IN WPC.16617/2010 .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4 -------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THRISSUR. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY MR.K.A.JALEEL, ADDL. AG GOVERNMENT PLEADER RESPONDENT(S): WRIT PETITIONER & 5TH RESPONDENT ----------------------------------------------- 1. V.E.SHEBI, H.S.A.ENGLISH, R.M.V.HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PERINJANAM.P.O., CHAVAKKAD EDUCATIONAL DISTRICT, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN – 680 686. 2. THE MANAGER, R.M.V.HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PERINJANAM.P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN – 680 686. BY DR.K.P.SATHEESAN FOR R1 MR.M.V.THAMBAN FOR R5 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JJ. ---------------------------------- W.A.No.737 of 2011 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 22nd day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T Ramachandran Nair, J. When this Writ Appeal is taken up, learned counsel for the respondents produced proceedings dated 04/04/2011 issued by the Government directing approval of the 1st respondent's appointment as High School Assistant (English) in the 2nd respondent School. It is seen that the order is issued by the Government pursuant to the directions issued by the learned Single Judge in the judgment, which is under appeal. It is not stated in the Government Order that compliance of the judgment is subject to result of the Writ Appeal. Consequently, we are inclined to assume that the judgment is accepted by the Government and the Writ Appeal is filed unnecessarily. Addl. Advocate General appearing for the State submitted that in view of the development the State cannot W.A.No.737/2011 -2- press the Writ Appeal. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) (BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JUDGE) jg