IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8382 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MISS JUSTICE R.M. DOSHIT ======================================================= 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO ---------------------------------------------------------- VINABEN T PATEL Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ---------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR RJ OZA for Petitioners MR PREMAL JOSHI AGP for Respondent No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 3, 4 ---------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT Date of decision: 06/10/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT The petitioners had passed SSC examination in the month of March, 1992 and had applied for admission to PTC course. On the basis of their marksheet, they were given admission to PTC course at Prabhas Patan and Surat respectively. On 11th November, 1992, the respondent no. 2 informed the petitioners that in the category to which the petitioners belonged, the admissions were given to only those students who had secured 495 marks out of 700 marks in the SSC examination, however, the petitioners had secured 493 marks and 494 marks respectively ie., less than the last admission granted. The petitioners were, therefore, called upon to show cause why their admission to PTC course should not be cancelled. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioners have preferred the present petition. Pending this petition, by order dated 10th December, 1992, this Court [Coram : R.A Mehta, J., as he then was] had made order as under :- "Leave to amend. Ad-interim relief permitting the petitioners to continue the classes in PTC course in respondents no. 3 and 4 schools till 18th December, 1992." The said relief was continued by subsequent order dated 17th December, 1992. Thus, it appears that the impugned show cause notices were not acted upon and the petitioners were permitted to continue their study in PTC course. In view of the passage of time, no further order can be made on this petition. Petition is accordingly disposed of. Rule is discharged. *** Prakash*