/f%5 'S'Svf "q|<)|i?iq, (i>fl|^'lfi, (slrtl+fy Xfl.&)A/o^%/^»9< •Y------^ siR(?r iia^ (ijci^sitiff) an^r ~vs ti-{\4i '(T!ff3n^?T st)^lc»i ^ ^CTTW ^lfTO 3ilt?I Mxsc. Appeal (C) No.838/3007 Kripa Sl-iri I Andhn1 Tehsil C.G. pain Gond, aged 40 years, s/o ^am Siagh Gond, resident of |ari Path, Alsaltara, P.S. Alcaltara, |Jaajgir, Distt. Jaiygir CIiampa Trrq Jaa ~s.:*^s^ s^&.s^ +w(ft-'B'l 'WRft' 'ilfs^Zt i.fat^K ^? aiRpT an^r fhati-ughna Gond, aged 19 years, son| cf Shri Rati Raia Gond, resident of I'vuiage Akaltara, near Bhafat Pip4r, Bajrang MohaUa, P.S. Akajltara, Distt. Jaiijgir Champa (c4) Pra^ Nei^) Jaiii 1'lie Oriental Insuraiice Co. Ltd., tbrc|ugh tbe Branch Maas^er, near Trm|iurti Tatkies, Cham.pa, District [gir Champa (.C.G) (Insurer) [|eo]d Naudaa JaisVi?al, s/o Baldeo jiad Jsuswal, resident of viBage Bai-adwar, Ward No.4; Distt. jgir Champa (C.G) •J' *'•&.-i^ *?d. •*a ail^i^TR-fi'b wnaiRW sOTiq? 3:5ST ^WW^, Q-i^WW, fsj^l'M^ Nl^dl *t<|eb ^P<"c) yi/o. S3.8J o^- W"---"------------/--(^ W^?T TRW ('qqf^g^tr) Shri Somiiath Verma, c< Shri Sudhir Agrav>7al, A on behalf of respondent no.3, fhis appeal & award is served Heai-d. In tliis case, only limitf laiiltipUer is ia issue, fherefor case, it v/as decided to dispoj itsetf. The appeUaat has prefe| <CI<fI<']<fll IHcff tf 1SIZt lf3R3R i?a;?fwT aii^i [unsel for the appellaat. [ivocate, is directed to accept notice ]Iiisuraace Couipaiiy aad tiie copy of |on the counsel for respondent no.3. :d poiut regarding fhe application of ;, being a short ponit involved in this >e of tliis appeal at fhe inotion stage -red tliis appeal u/s 173 offhe Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 beiug Eigg^-ieved by the award dated 14.6.2007 passed by the Second Addjl. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaiijgir, in CIami Case Pio.Si after assessing the depende^cy of the appellaat to the tune of Rs.10,000/- per year aad tifter appl^-iag fhe niultiplier of 15, awai-ded the coinpensation) Rs.5000/- towards love atid) 2007 whereby tbe leanied Tribunal, f of Rs.1,50,000/- as dependency, affection aad Rs.2000/- for luneral GRPRJ— BSS -SvSf ^||<<|(>'i4|, ®Tf|<H'|c,Ricilti^ SII^I.'^T ft'li'h TOTSII^T -9PW 'WRW *MI*^...^.^^.....^.....^.^o^ 3n^?r ^gw (lyf^itir) expenses. Thus, a total aw-arded by the Tribunal Mr. Verma ai'gues that order lias raentioned fhe age the luultipUer of 15 has been II, fhe leamed Tribunal ough Therefore, appellaut is eatitli ainount. On fhe other hand, 1s opposed fhe argum.euts of Tribunal has awai'ded tb.e juj taking io.to cousideration cu'cuiastances of the case. Having heard counsel impugiied awarcl. In Para Ij arrived at the conclusion years, fherefore, fhe laultipljii second schediile, whereas,^a| iu case of fbe age froiu 35 t4 chl^<n<ft'f iffq^Tf ^ 1:t1^ <r<t|4^- ^aiRriiail^r ;|inouat of Rs.1,57,000/- has been |±.elearued Tribruial ia bis impugned iiffhe appeUaiit as 40 years. However, |applied whereas, as per ttie Schedllle to haye applied fhe luultiplier of 16. |:d for enhauceinent of coiapensation :araed counsel for respondent no.3 Mr.Verina and subinits fhat the >t and reasonable coiupensation after the totalit}' of fhe facts aiid for tlie parties, we have perused the 2 of the award, the leai-ned Tribuiial tijiat the age of fhe appeUaat was 40 ;r of 15 is to be applied as per the perusal of fhe schedule II shows fh.at 40 years, the laultiplier of 16 has to GRPRJ S^ET -^|A|l<rtA|, arfl+i'is, fs|<t»|^^< M.A'^c') A/o.SIp/o-^ "-^ an^yr ^w (ipfg^r; sn^r.^H R.-fi'fi WT3]T^T •5KSf /- i,.. <'F' Rao be applied, therefore, appare appUed by fhe Tribunal whicb Accordiagly, the appeal for enlianceiaent of coini: Rs.1,60,000/- appl}Tng the mi awat-d i.e., Rs.5000/- toward; fiuieral expenses are iaaiataia| la tiie result, fhe appe amouilt is ilicreased to Rs. 1,< The claimaut shaU be entiUel iroin tlie date ofaward. The i1 said aiuouat within a period o|! +i''iffi4lH 'qitRff tf fs^ •(fSresre i? sifgir sn^r (itly a wroiig inultipUer has beer |is not sustatuable. succeeds. The appeUant is entitled |ensation froni Rs.1,50,000/- tc 1.11tiplier of 16. The ofher amoim.ts ol |love and aSection aad Rs.2000/- foi fcd as it is. d is allowed aud the coiapensatioii >7,000/- ia place of Rs.1,57.000/-. 1 for the interest @ 6% per anniim sspoiident uo.3 is dii'ected to pay the 2 inoiiflis. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge GRPRJ— FS/246—2/2007— 50.000. ^ 11V