IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 26TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 7TH PHALGUNA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 74 of 2008(S) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.20572/2006 .................... PETITIONER/5TH RESPONDENT: ----------------------------------------------- R.ANJALI, AGED 26, W/O. SANTHOSHKUMAR, UPSA, DEVASWOM BOARD UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, VILAKUDY, RESIDING AT KARIKKATTU PUTHEN VEEDU, KUNNATHOOR EAST P.O. BY ADV. SRI.G.SASIDHARAN CHEMPAZHANTHIYIL SRI.S.VISHNU RESPONDENTS/1ST RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------------------- 1. JAMES VARGHESE, AGED APPROX. 50, S/O. (NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. JABABALAN O LIVER, AGED APPRX. 50, S/O. (NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), UNDER SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION (H) DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. M.P. SREEKRISHNAN. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/02/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cont. Case (C) No.74 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 26th day of February, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner is the fifth respondent in the writ petition. This court had disposed of the writ petition by directing the first respondent to consider and take a decision on Exts.P11 and P12 representations in accordance with law after hearing all the affected parties including petitioners and appointees. The complaint in the Contempt of Court Case is that an order is passed in the matter without hearing the petitioner. It is complaining of the same that the Contempt of Court Case is filed. 2. Today, when the matter came up, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that the order has been recalled and the petitioner will be heard and a decision will be taken. It is also pointed out that the petitioner has already filed a writ petition challenging the order. In such circumstances, I feel that it is not necessary for me to continue with the contempt proceedings. The Contempt of Court Case is dropped for the present. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb