IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 7349 of 2010 Date of decision:- 14.03.2011 Amit Kumar ....Petitioner Vs. Mausmi ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL ****** Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. Bijender Dhankar, Advocate, for the respondent. A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) This petition assails the order dated 08.10.2010 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Additional District Judge, Sonepat, whereby the application filed by the respondent-wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, was allowed The petitioner-husband is stated to be working in the firm at Gurgaon as a Mechanical Engineer and he is drawing a salary of Rs.15,000/- per month. To the contrary, respondent has no income to maintain herself. The allegations are that she is running a beauty parlour and earning handsome income to maintain herself. But, in the absence of any such proof, it cannot be presumed that she has sufficient means to maintain herself. Resultantly, finding no merit in the petition, the same is hereby dismissed. (A.N.JINDAL) 14th of March, 2011 JUDGE ajp