1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No.M-27152 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 9.1.2009. Jai Bhagwan ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Sumit Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab. Rajan Gupta, J. The petitioner is seeking the quashing of FIR on various grounds, enumerated in this petition. A short reply in the form of Affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State wherein it has been stated that the petitioner is neither an accused in FIR No.134 dated 04.04.2008, registered under Sections 452, 448, 380, 511, 148, 149 IPC at Police Station Sadar, Patiala nor is he required by the police in the above said case. According to the said affidavit, after investigation, challan has been presented in the court of competent jurisdiction on 25th November, 2008. However, the petitioner is not an accused in the said challan. In view of the reply filed by the State, nothing survives in the petition for quashing. The same is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE January 09, 2009 'rajpal'