IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 2614 of 2011 Date of decision: 12.5.2011 Sharanjit Kaur … Petitioner versus Mohinder Kaur … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. M.S.Sachdev, Advocate, for the petitioner ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioner is the mother and is aggrieved with order dated 5.2.2011 wherein the Guardian Judge has asked her to produce the minor child, namely, Jaspreet Kaur, on every second saturday from 2 PM to 4 PM for meeting with her grand-mother Mohinder Kaur. The facts are that Mohinder Kaur (grand-mother) filed petition under Sections 7 and 11 of the Guardian and Wards Act for the custody of minor grand-daughter, Jaspreet Kaur, born out of the wed-lock of her son Ranjit Singh and respondent Sharanjit Kaur. During the pendency of the petition, Mohinder Kaur filed an application for meeting the child once in a week in Court and on the said application, the impugned order has been passed. Hence, this revision by Sharanjit Kaur, the mother. Heard. The impugned order indicates that the impugned order is non-speaking and has been passed without application of mind. Reply to the application of Mohinder Kaur was also filed. There has been no discussion of the reply in the impugned order. Thus, the impugned order being non-speaking one, deserves to be set aside. It is ordered accordingly. The case is remitted back to the Court concerned to decide the application C.R. No. 2614 of 2011 -2- afresh after passing a speaking order, ofcourse upon hearing both the parties. Any observation made herein shall not be construed to be an expression on the merits of the case. May 12, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE