The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.34265 of 2011 Date: 27-12-2011 Between: M/s.Kankor Precision Technologies, A partnership firm, rep. by its partner K.Gautham Reddy ..... Petitioner AND 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Land Acquisition) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and 2 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.N.Subba Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1: AGP for Land Acquisition Counsel for respondent No.2: Mr.M.Dhananjaya Reddy Counsel for respondent No.3: Mr.Y.Ravindra The Court made the following : Order: The short issue that is raised in this Writ Petition is, whether the procedure followed by the respondents, in notifying the petitioner’s landed property situated in Survey No.588/Part of Dundigal Village, Quthbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without showing its name as the owner or occupant, is proper or not. At the hearing, it has come out that, even though the petitioner has purchased the aforementioned property under registered sale deed, dated 19-01-2005, its name is not shown in the notification under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the Act’), issued on 03-05- 2011, for the reason that its name is not mutated in the revenue records. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner is running an industry and its interests are likely to be affected on account of the proposed acquisition, this Court is of the opinion that it would be fair to give an opportunity to the petitioner to raise objections to the proposed acquisition, which could not be availed by it on account of non- mentioning of its name in the notification. Therefore, without adjudicating on the issue whether the non-mentioning of the petitioner’s name in the impugned notification has vitiated the acquisition proceedings, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.3 to hold a fresh enquiry to the extent of the petitioner’s property referred to above, which is covered by the impugned notification, dated 03-05- 2011, issued under Section 4 (1) of the Act. To facilitate such enquiry, declaration, dated 08-12-2011, issued under Section 6 of the Act, is set aside only to the extent of the petitioner’s property. The petitioner is permitted to submit its objections within a period of three weeks from today. If such objections are filed, respondent No.3 shall give the petitioner an opportunity of personal hearing and pass a fresh order before seeking to proceed further with the proposed acquisition. As a sequel, WPMP.No.42644 of 2011, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 27th December, 2011 LUR