IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID MONDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2008 / 2ND ASHADHA 1930 LA.App..No. 1038 of 2007(D) --------------------------- LAR.100/1998 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM .................... APPELLANT: RESPONDENT NO.1: --------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED ANZAR.K.J. RESPONDENTS: CLAIMANT & ADDL.RESPONDENT NO.2: --------------------------------------------- 1. VINEETHA BABU, PUTHUVAL MANACAUD, VINEESH BHAVAN, KULATHOOR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, V. SUBHA. 2. K.G. SATHEESH KUMAR, WORKING AS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY PART (KERALA), KARIAVATTOM POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.A.AHAMED, SC, TECHNOPARK SMT.M.HEMALATHA FOR R.1 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: KURIAN JOSEPH & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ. ----------------------------------------- L.A.A.No.1038 of 2007 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph,J. This appeal is filed against the judgment and decree in L.A.R.No.100/1998 on the file of the Sub Court, Thiruvananthapuram. The acquisition is for the purpose of Techno Park. The extent involved is only 92 Sq.Metres. The enhancement is only nominal, ie. Rs.4725/- per Are. It is seen that such enhancement is based on the evidence adduced by the claimant relying on Ext.A1 document. There is no witness for the respondent. In the above circumstances we do not find any merit in the appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. I.A.No.2624/2007 is also dismissed. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) (HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE) ahg. KURIAN JOSEPH & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ. --------------------------- L.A.A.No.1038 of 2007 ---------------------------- JUDGMENT 23rd June, 2008