:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1729 OF 2005 Sanjay Shankar Sagale @ Patil ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr.Shashank P. Borade, for the Applicant. Mr.A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . Heard Counsel for the parties. Learned A.P.P. on instructions fairly states that as and when the investigating officer decides to arrest the Applicant, in connection with the offence in question, after collecting some material to indicate complicity of the Applicant in the commission of the crime, he shall give 48 hours’ advance notice to the Applicant in that behalf to :2: enable the Applicant to take recourse to remedy, as may be available in law. . Accordingly, this application is disposed of on the assurance given by the investigating officer through the learned A.P.P., as mentioned above. However, the Applicant shall extend full co-operation for the purpose of investigation as and when called upon. . Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)