COPC No.80 of 2010 18.6.2010 Present: Mr. Vijay Bir, vice Mr. T.S. Chauhan, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. A.G. with Mrs. Shubh Mahajan, Dy. A.G. for the respondent. The respondent is present. It has been submitted that reply has been filed in the Registry today but it is not on record. Be taken on record, if in order. The learned Additional Advocate General has shown me the copy of the reply. It has been submitted in para-4 of the reply that petitioner was heard on 17.6.2010 and he sought some time for filing additional documents. The request of the petitioner was allowed and the matter is now fixed on 29.6.2010 at 11.30 AM. The respondent who is present in the court has stated that if the documents are placed by the petitioner as prayed by him on 17.6.2010 before 29.6.2010 then the representation of the petitioner will be decided by a speaking order on 29.6.2010 itself or immediately thereafter. In these circumstances, I am satisfied that no purpose will be served at this stage to continue the petition. It will be open to the respondent to decide the representation of the petitioner by a speaking order as stated by him. Accordingly, the proceedings are dropped and notice discharged. (Kuldip Singh) Judge June 18, 2010 (sks)