IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 7TH OCTOBER 2010 / 15TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 29924 of 2010(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER : ----------------- SURESH, SREENILAYAM, NEDUMON, ADOOR. BY ADVS. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR SMT.G.CHITRA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN 691 001. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM, PIN 691 001. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO.29924 OF 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of October, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner has submitted Ext.P1 application for grant of regular permit to conduct stage carriage service on the route Pidavoor-Adoor via Panthaplavu, Pattazhi Temple, Kaduvathoda, Chelikkuzhy, Kilikkodu, Pattazhymukku and Parakkode under the provisions of Motor Vehicles Act. Ext.P3 would reveal that the said application was taken up for consideration. However, the consideration of the application was adjourned for the purpose of ascertaining whether the portion of the said route lies in Pathanamthitta district. In case, the portion of the route in question lies within the Pathanamthitta district, prior concurrence from RTA Pathanamthitta has to be obtained. In fact, it was for that purpose its consideration was adjourned. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader. The learned Government Pleader submitted that Ext.P1 application could be considered in the next RTA meeting. This is recorded. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction W.P.(C) NO.29924/2010 2 to the first respondent to take a final decision on Ext.P1 application submitted by the petitioner in the next RTA meeting. While considering Ext.P1 application, the first respondent shall also look into Ext.P2 route enquiry report. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc W.P.(C) NO.29924/2010 3 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. JUDGMENT September, 2010 W.P.(C) NO.29924/2010 4