C-78 ^ScI '-qiqirto, u>-al1<l<l<?, RrtTtl^X ^\^ ^\\\ *l 1*101 ^TT^ 3TT^?T q^l> (^c|ijc|<g) ^200 3TT^$TcpT^ra? n^rT3n^^T3mt<p B^TT^R ^Tf^T 3TT^$T w.fl. (St No.6371/2008 PBTITIONBR Smt. ^ 48 CWest-^ hamim Anwar, W/o Shazid Nafiz, about R/o C/186 HTPS, CSEB Colony <orba), District-Korba (CG) ye^rs Versilis RESPONDENTS 1. The ^tate Princi^al Depart|3ient, St^te 2. The Schooll Bhawa}i - 3. The 4. The Janpa^ WRIT PETITION UNDER, CoBlector Ohief ARTICtLE SB: HON. 8HRI DHIRBNDRAl 18-11-2008 Shri Ravish Venna, Shri Arun Sao, Govt, Heard. Grievaiice of the petitio^ie Kanai Grade-III after foUowitlLg Annexure P-3 dated 4.7.20081. Annexure P-4 ia Primary Thereafter, vide order of postmg was changed to the petitioner was ser^ed wifh) statiiig fherein tliat the d^ certi&cate equivalent to D.Ed) cpt<lfc^<Tttl HPTc^^'fe^ N(fvjt^l<< ^ 3rf^T 3TT^$T of Chhattisgarh, throiigh: tlie Secretary Panchayat & Rural D.K.S. Bhawaa, Distt. Raipur (CG) of Chhattisgarh, ftirough: Secretary aad Education Depaitment, DKS , Raipur (CG) Korba, Disti-ict-Korba (CG) Executive Officer, Office of the Paiichayat Korba, District- Korba (CQ) 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA MISHRA, J coubsel for the petitioner, for the State. A4vocate i^ier is fhat she was appoiated as Shiksha due process of selection vide order of 3|, She jomied her duties on 8.7.2008 vide Shivnagar (Rumgada), Distdct-Korba, P-8 dated 21.8.2008, her place of School Gopalpahri, Korba. However, a inemo ofAanexure P-1 dated 4.9,2008 l)£aicile certificate aad tt'amed teacher have not been issiied by tUe coxapetent Schbol Annlexure Rrijm[ary -78 ^TwT '-qi^irt^i, yTTlti'iKo, Rrtltl^ *<l*ic»l^TT^ 3TT^$TcPTf^;TT<P ^H3TT^^T9RTcp 3H^?T q^cp (T?crf36R?) ^200 B^HW?^^\ 3ff^$T - z fhere^fter, aufhority aixd it was directed authenticated certi&cates by to be caiiceUed. The petitione|r P-10 and prayed for time tc| D,Ed. certificate aad certificate ofAnnexiire P-2 a| P-9. Even then, she is not b^ basis of iaipiigned oider. Leamed counsel for fh4 be disposed of by a directio4 Paachayat Korba to pass app[r< docuraents ofAnnexiires P-2 Leamed cozinsel for thi shall pass appropriate ord|( petitioner and dociiinents sit] of tliree weeks froia fhe de(t order. in view of fhe above parties, the iastaat petition| respoiident No.4' to pass ap] reply and d.ociiizi.ents of petitioner within a perio^ receipt/ production of copy of| |that m case she does not produce proper 115.9.2008, her services shall be deemed :|r ffled her rcply on 8.9.2008 ofAnnexure produce doniicUe certificate as wefl as ^fter, she has already produced D.Ed, b well as domicile certificate of Annexure ^iag atlowed to resuine her diities on fhe cpi<<fo<nri +ii+ic")T^?Fsl<3 ^^i^ ^>3ri^T3TT^9T petitioner siibmits that fhis petition may to tlie respondent No.4/C.E.O., Jaiipad ipp|ropriate order ia tlie light of reply and the |& P-9 submitted by ftie petitioner. b State subndts that the respondent No,4 ^r after considerhig fhe reply of the Ibniitted by the petitioner within a period [te of receipt/production of copy of ttcis submission of leanied counsel for .fhe is disposed of with a directioii to the >ropria.te order after diily considermg the A[nnexure P-2 & P-9 submitted by fhe of three weeks from. fhe date of Ithis order. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge