IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 124 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 124 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 124 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2356 OF 2005 Shri Chetan Ashokkumar Patil ... Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra &Anr. ... Respondents Mr. Sandeep Kume, Advocate i/b. Mr. Umesh R.Mankapure, Advocate, for the applicant. Mrs. S.D.Shinde, APP, for the State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & J.H.BHATIA, JJ. J.H.BHATIA, JJ. J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 23rd June, 2008. DATE : 23rd June, 2008. DATE : 23rd June, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Mr. Sandeep Kume, the learned Counsel for the applicant. 2. We have noted that Writ Petition No.2356 of 2005 was dismissed for default for the first time on 20.3.2006 and it was thereafter restored. On 31.3.2008, none was present for the petitioner and therefore the petition was kept on the next day when nobody appeared for the petitioner and therefore on 1.4.2008, the petition was again dismissed for default. This is for the second time that the learned Counsel is approaching us for restoration of the same. 3. The Application is filed in time. The same can be disposed off. Therefore, this Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)