- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.413 OF 2005 FROM ORDER NO.413 OF 2005 FROM ORDER NO.413 OF 2005 Salim Rehman Multani & ors. ...Appellants vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others ...Respondents Mr.P.P.Surve for the Appellants Ms Geeta Joglekar for the Respondent No.1 Mr.Singh for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : MARCH 28, 2005. : MARCH 28, 2005. : MARCH 28, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 states that an application has already been made to the Respondent No.1-Corporation for grant of licence under Section 390 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 and till today the said application is not considered by the Respondent No.1. The learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 seeks one week’s time to produce copy of the said application. 2. Place the Appeal on Monday 4th April 2005 in urgent admission list. The learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 states that till further orders are passed by this Court, the Respondent No.3 will not run the flour mill in dispute. 3. Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order. JUDGE. JUDGE. JUDGE.