1 17-39-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY srj CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.39 OF 2011 Shri Balaji M. Waghmare .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. K.K.Malpathak, for the Applicant. Mr. Y.M.Nakhawa, APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM : N.D.DESHPANDE,J. DATE : 4th FEBRUARY, 2011. P.C.: 1 No case is made out for expeditious hearing of the trial. The learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the impugned proceeding is another attempt of harassment. It is based on false, baseless and groundless complaint of demand of dowry. Except this ground, nothing is mentioned or worked out and there is no averments made for expeditious hearing of the trial. This is not a valid ground for expeditious hearing. Application is misconceived. Hence, dismissed. (N.D.DESHPANDE, J.)