IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWPs No. 2543, 2545, 2546, 2560 and 2561 of 2011 Decided on: 27th April, 2011. 1. CWP No. 2543 of 2011. Virender Singh Motiyan & ors. vs. State of H.P. & ors. 2. CWP No. 2545 of 2011. Ravinder Retka & ors. vs. State of H.P. & ors. 3. CWP No. 2546 of 2011. Sanjay Kumar Thakur. vs. State of H.P. & ors. 4. CWP No. 2560 of 2011. Neelam Kumari. vs. State of H.P. & anr. 5. CWP No.2561 of 2011. Rajender Singh Mehta. Vs. State of H.P. & others. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim vacation salary. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue is covered 2 in favour of the petitioners by the decision of this Court in CWP No.415 of 2000, titled as Baldev Singh and others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others. 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioners submit that they would file appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for them to do so. 3. The writ petitions stand disposed of directing the respondents to disburse the eligible vacation salary to the petitioners after verifying the facts within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and copy of the judgment, referred to above by the petitioner concerned before the second respondent. 4. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 27th April, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr) Judge. 3