Applicant/ Petitioaier HIGH COURT OF ClIHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. No. 473 of2W7 Bhuneshwar (Now dead), Through: Legal Representative Padduram, S/o Turiya, aged about 35 years, Caste-Uraon, R/o Village Turidih, P.8. Balrampur, Tahsil Pal,District Surguja (CG). VER8US Non-appUcants/ ^Respondeiits 1. Meghana, 8/0 Nakku, Caste-Bhuiliar, 2. A. Kismatiya, Wd/o late Lorsa @ Ramjatan, aged about55 years. 2 B. Budhnarayan, S/o Late Lorsa @ Ramjatan, aged about 33 years. All r/o Village Tangar Marhi, Tahsil Pal, District Surguja (CG). 3. Soti, S/o Dhani Soni, R/o village Balrampur, Tahsil Pal, District Surguja (CG). 4. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Ramanujganj, District Surguja (CG). 5. Collector, Surguja, Ambikapur, District Surgiya (CG). 6. The Board of Revenue, Bilaspur, Through its Cbaimiari,At & Post Bilaspur (CG). 7. State of Chhattisgarh Througli: Secretary Revenue Department, DK8 Bhawan, Raipur (CG). (APPUCATION FOR RESTORATION OF W.P. No. 5052/1996) CSB: Hoii'ble Mr. Satisli K. Agiiiliotri, J.) Present : Shri A.K. Prasad, Advocate for the applicant. Shi'i Sunil Tripathi, Advocate for the respondeiit No. 1,2A & 2B. Shi'i Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer forthe State. ORAL ORDER (Passed oa 16t11 day of December, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1,2A & 2B subniits that the delay explamed by the applicant is not proper. The applicant is required to explain delay of24 days on dayto day basis. ^?-:^^--®^^' ^ 2. Be that as it may, in the interest ofjustice, satisfactory explaiiation has been given by the counsel for the applicant. Delayis accordingly condoned. 3. Leamed counsel appearing fbr ttie applicant submits that A^ counsel fbr the petitioner could not appear on account ofbonafide mistake, therefbre/W.P. No. 5052/1996, which was disinissed on 22.08.2007, may be restored to its file. 4. Reasonabie and sufficient cause hasbeen shown. W.P No. 5052/1996 is restored to the origmal file, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 500/- by the applicaiit, to the High Court Legal Aid Committee. 5. A copy oftliis order be placed on record ofthe original petition and the same be listed for hearing. 6. In view offhe above, application forrestoration is allowed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotrl Judge