IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 29TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 4912 of 2009(I) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- BYSEL PROPERTIES, OFFICE AT 44/3547, DESABHIMANI ROAD, KOCHI - 682 017 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER - M.SUFANA. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.ASOKAN SMT.S.AMINA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SUB REGISTRAR, EDAPPALLY, KOCHI-24. 2. DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), ERNAKULAM. 3. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SATHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No. 4912 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 18th day of February, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner presented the original of Ext.P1 sale deed before the first respondent for registration. That was declined to be registered and there upon this writ petition is filed, seeking a direction to the respondents to register the document. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner relies on Ext.P4 series of judgments where this court has taken the view that the first respondent is bound to accept the document and take necessary steps for its registration and thereafter, if necessary, further action in terms of the Registration Act and the Stamp Act shall be taken. Therefore, the writ petition is also disposed of with the aforesaid direction to the 1st respondent. Wp(c).No.4912/09 /2/ Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the Ist respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/