1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.07.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE R.MALA Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.8187 & 8188 of 2011 & M.P(MD)Nos.1 & 1 of 2011 A.George ... Petitioner in both petitions Vs The Inspector of of Police, Commercial Crime Investigation Wing, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondent in both petitions Prayer: Petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondent police to investigate the matter further in C.C.Nos.16 and 15 of 2006 respectively pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Tirunelveli, regarding the involvement of said Sundaravel against the alleged misappropriation happened at Azhigiapandiapuram Primary Agricultural Co-operative Bank. For Petitioner in both petitions :Mr.K.P.Narayanakumar For Respondents in both Petitions::Mr.K.V.Rajarajan Govt.dvocate (Crl. Side) * * * * * COMMON ORDER These petitions have been filed by the petitioner to direct the respondent police to investigate the matter further in C.C.Nos.16 and 15 of 2006 respectively pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Tirunelveli, regarding the involvement of said Sundaravel against the alleged misappropriation happened at Azhigiapandiapuram Primary Agricultural Co-operative Bank. 2.The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner/complainant is a third party and that the investigation in C.C.Nos.16 and 15 of 2006 are pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Tirunelveli and that the said cases have been registered on the basis of complaint given by the District Registrar in Crime No.3 of 2005 under Sections 468,471,477(A) and 408 of IPC. He further submitted that after the completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed against two persons namely one Perumalpillai and another Arunachalam Pillai, but the charge sheet has been taken on file in C.C.Nos.15 and 16 of 2006 which are pending before the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Judicial Magistrate No.2, Tirunelveli. Now, the third party one A.George, Cashier, who is responsible for the amount misappropriated and hence, he filed the present petition for a direction to investigate the matter. 3.Heard Mr.K.P.Narayanakumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also Mr.K.V.Rajarajan, learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 4.Considering the rival submissions, this Court is of the view that the petitioner kept quite all along without taking any steps to put forth his case. In such circumstances, he has been personally instigated by the accused to file these petitions for protracting the matter. Hence, I do not find any merits in these case which deserve to be dismissed. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(P&A) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Inspector of of Police, Commercial Crime Investigation Wing, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +One cc to Mr.K.N.Narayanakumar, Advocate, SR.No.22527 gsr rl/4c – 20.7.2011 Crl.O.P(MD).Nos.8187 & 8188 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/