IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH OCTOBER 2009 / 22ND ASWINA 1931 RP.No. 957 of 2009(L) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.33503/2007 DATED 01/12/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/ RESPONDENTS IN THE WPC. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, INDIAN AUDIT AND ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A&E), M.G.ROAD, P.B.NO.5607, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DIRECTOR OF TREASURIES, DIRECTORATE OF TREASURIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. SUB TREASURY OFFICER, SUB TREASURY, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.P.N. SANTHOSH. RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS IN THE WPC. -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. T.U. MATHUKUTTY, ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT (FAST TRACK COURT II), PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. EMMANUEL P.KOLADY, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT (FAST TRACK COURT III), PATHANAMTHITTA. 3. CHERIAN VARGHESE, SUB JUDGE & ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE, SUB COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA. 4. K.SASIKUMAR, MUNSIFF, PATHANMTHITTA. 5. V. SATHEESH KUMAR, JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE II, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. MR.JACOB P.ALEX. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs. P.N.RAVINDRAN,J. ---------------------------------------- R.P. No.957 of 2009 in W.P.(C) No.33503 of 2007 - L ---------------------------------------- Dated 14th October, 2009 Order Heard Sri.P.N.Santhosh, the learned Government Pleader appearing for the review petitioners. 2. On going through Ext.P1 as modified by Ext.P2 and the recommendations of the First National Judicial Pay Commissioin, I am satisfied that the directions issued by me in the judgment delivered on 1.12.2008 do not require to be reviewed or modified. I accordingly hold that no grounds have been made out to entertain this review petition. It is accordingly dismissed in limine. P.N.RAVINDRAN Judge vaa