BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 76 g0 OF 2011 Director, Local Self Government, Raipur (C.G.) Municipal Corporation Rajnandgaon Through— Commissioner, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. PETITIONER Kapileshwar Prasad Sahu, S/o Late Kasuram Sahu, Aged about 61 years, R/o Ward No.37, Sagarpara, Nagar Nigam Staff Quarter Rajnandgaon, C.G. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through— The Secretary, Department of Local Self Government, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAS R SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTXCE PRITINKER DIWAKER W.P.(Si.NO. 7680(2011 Shri Alok Dewangan, counsel fer the petitioner. Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, PL. for the State. WRIT PETETION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA xx 2m oRnER (15.12.2011) finally With the conssnt of the counsel for the parties, the matter is heard The present case pertains to the non—payment of retiral clues in particular the amount of PF, 8s D.A. Counsel for the State submits that the State Government has already constituted a High Power Retiral Dues Committee and the said Committee is duly empowered to consider the cases like that of the petitioner. Let the petitioner file a representation to the said Committee or to make a request to the office of the Advocate General along with copy of the writ petition for foxwarcling the same to the Committee. Let this he done within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. On this being done, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and officers concerned within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order in accordance with law after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner, be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It is made clear that before the Committee the petitioner would be at liberty to file appropriate application for grant of interim relief. I”. ‘V With the above observations, this petition is disposed of. / ,, /, f Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker j Judge r i / PETITIONER Kapileshwar Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh 8s Others