IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.27017 of 2011 Date of decision:- 03.10.2011 Saggi @ Sagir and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present:- Mr. Bijender Dhankhar, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. AJAY TEWARI, J.(ORAL) This is a petition for regular bail in case bearing FIR No. 109/2011 dated 02.04.2011 under Sections 323, 302/34 IPC registered at Police Station Punhana, District Mewat-Nuh. On 06.09.2011, the following contention was noticed:- “After arguing for some time learned counsel for the petitioners prays for permission to withdraw the present petition qua petitioner No. 1. Allowed as prayed for. Dismissed as withdrawn qua petitioner No. 1. As regards petitioner No. 2, learned counsel has argued that he has been attributed only an action which would attract Section 323 IPC and Section 34 IPC would not be made out on a perusal of the FIR since the occurrence was a result of sudden provocation and the petitioner has been in custody since 07.04.2011.” CRM-M No.27017 of 2011 2 Learned Assistant Advocate General on instructions from SI, Barinder Singh has accepted the fact that only simply injury has been attributed to the petitioner. In this view of the matter, without commenting on merits, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of regular bail to petitioner No. 2 on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Nuh. (AJAY TEWARI) 03.10.2011 JUDGE reena