IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 21ST AUGUST 2009 / 30TH SRAVANA 1931 RP.No. 789 of 2009() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN AFA.14/1999 Dated 12/03/2009 REVIEW PETITIONER: APPELLANT ------------------------------- VARGHESE ALIAS VAREED, S/O.PARAYIL ALIAS CHITTILAPPILLY INASU, THALOOR VILLAGE, PARAPPOOR DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. BY ADVs. M/S.M.P.KRISHNAN NAIR & V.B. NARAYANAN. RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. FRANCIS, S/O.PARAYIL ALIAS CHITTILAPPILLY INASU, THOLOOR VILLAGE, PARAPOOR DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. 2. DAVIS, S/O.PARAYIL ALIAS CHITTILAPPILLY INASU, THOLOOR VILLAGE, PARAPOOR DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMAN & P. S. GOPINATHAN, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P. NO. 789/2009 IN A.F.A. 14/1999 = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2009. O R D E R Raman, J. Petitioner seeks review of our judgment in A.F.A. 14/1999 dated 12.3.2009. It was after considering all the relevant aspects that we disposed of the appeal by a considered judgment. We have gone through the review petition and the grounds urged. We do not find any errors apparent on the face of the record. Review being not a re-hearing of the appeal and there is no scope for any such re-appreciation of the facts even by the first appellate court. But we have in our judgment, considered the matter at length and agreed with the judgment of the learned Single Judge and in such circumstances, we do not find any good ground for review. However, certain typographical error occurred in the judgment. 2. In our judgment in A.F.A. 14/1999 in the first sentence, it is written that "this is the sixth round of litigation between brothers which started as early as in 1996". The year '1996' is a mistake. In the place of the year "1996" the year "1976" shall be substituted. RP 789/09 IN AFA 14/99 2 Likewise, in Page 3 of the judgment, in the sentence "who is the brother of Inasu and that the daughters of Paily had taken divine oath and that Kochu Devassy, the only son of "Inasu" died during his school days" in the place of the name "Inasu" the name "Paily" be substituted. Ordered accordingly. P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE P. S. GOPINATHAN, JUDGE. KNC/-