IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH JANUARY 2011 / 29TH POUSHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 490 of 2011() ---------------------------------------- (CRIME NO.530/2009OF CHAVAKKAD POLICE STATION, THRISSUR) ...... PETITIONER/ACCUSED: --------------------------------------- SURESH, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.GOPALAN, PULLATT HOUSE, MAMBULLY, KANDASSANKADAVU DESOM, KARAMUCKU VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM (CRIME NO.530 OF 2009 OF CHAVAKKAD POLICE STATION.) BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/01/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. ------------------------------- Bail Application No.490 of 2011 ------------------------------- DATED: 19.01.2011 O R D E R Petitioner, who is the sole accused in C.P.No.62 of 2010 on the file of the J.F.C.M, Chavakkad, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Admittedly, non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same day on which it is filed, bearing in mind the decision in Sukumari v. State of Kerala - 2001 (1) KLT 22, notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioner and also after considering the explanation offered by the petitioner for his previous non-appearance. With the above observation this application is disposed of . Dated this the 19th day of January, 2011. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. sj