HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.13276 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.01.2011 **** Suresh Kumar Bansal . . . . Petitioner VS. Punjab & Haryana High Court & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. AP Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Raman Mahajan, Advocate for the respondents ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner is aggrieved by the orders dated 06/12.05.2009 (Annexure P4) whereby the learned District & Sessions Judge, Sangrur has initiated a regular departmental enquiry against the petitioner. (2). In my considered view, the impugned action requires no interference by a writ Court as the petitioner would be at liberty to raise all his pleas before the enquiry officer, who shall be obligated to consider the same in accordance with law. (3). Dismissed with liberty aforementioned. (4). Dasti . CWP No.13276 of 2009.doc - 2 – 18.01.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge 2