IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.638 of 2007 Mohammad Yahia S/o Late Gulam Rasool resident of Village Salahabujurg P.O. & P.S. Rosera Dist Samastipur Plaintiff- Petitioner Versus 1. State of Bihar though Anchaladhikari, Hasanpur Dist. Samastipur 2. Collector, Samastipur Defendants-Opposite Ist parties 3. Mohammad Zakaria 4. Mohammad Arudullah Both sons of Late Gulam Rasool resident of Village Salahabujurg P.O. & P.S. Rosera Dist Samastipur Plaintiffs-Opposite 2nd parties 5. Mohammad Farooq Son of Gulam Sabir 6. Mohammad Samim @ Bhola S/o Abdul Gafoor Both resident of Village Salahabujurg P.O. & P.S. Rosera Dist Samastipur Intervenors-Opposite 3rd parties ----------- For the petitioner: Mr Rajiv Ranjan Sinha, Advocate --------- 02 09.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This civil revision has been filed by the plaintiff- petitioner challenging order dated 15.03.2007 passed in Title Suit no. 53 of 2004 by which learned Munsif, Rosera allowed the intervention application filed by the opposite party nos.5 and 6 and added them as parties defendants. 3. The aforesaid suit was filed by the plaintiff- petitioner against defendants-opposite party-Ist set, namely, the State of Bihar and its Collector for declaration of his title over the suit land claiming to be purchaser from the descendants of Abdul Quyaum a raiyat of Darbhanga Maharaj stating that his title was perfected by adverse possession. He also challenged the entry of the suit land in the record of right as void, illegal and without any effect. 4. In the said suit defendants appeared and contested. - 2 - However, during the pendency of the suit interevenors- opposite party nos. 5 and 6 filed an intervention application claiming that the land in question belonged to the State of Bihar and same was settled by the State of Bihar in their names by issuing red cards and hence they had entered into the shoe of the State. The said application has been allowed by the learned court below vide order dated 15.03.2007 which is under challenge in the instant civil revision. 5. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this Court does not find any illegality in the impugned order of the learned court below nor does it find any jurisdictional error therein. Accordingly, this civil revision is dismissed. shahid (S.N.Hussain, J)