fr961. MiJ^J^te JbJ^lMt^ ^S(fe [^JllMls ^.|iJ^-^Jte oitoa AJMJ^ u^i^ y^i+ P^l^h jfc MJI ipiby '^i^K hlhfc^bi I^b i^m. i.e Mtj^ 'ip^btaji^ 'u&i^ '^fei^.^ <, (^.^u&/ ^ibNmc\ .^*^'^ ...^" ^'"" ..^'^ ^- €-••"" kl^b OJ10J± N'fi^blft ll^J^ 'iMh ^ U^&^J± ^U±'lSlt 2^h .^\\^r0^ 'mh^ <&yj^ 2^h OI^'J^aJ±l^lt€t/^l ^^J?\ •^lh ^U^Ji 1^^^ ^ 1M& 'ltey^ > ' ""l^y^lUKN ^ ^fcl^^ y$r J^h jafc L7. fi^ il&ttj. J^ji |pk^ vr --- ^p[jv^ '^ ysu^i^ ^ [O^O^) OIOZ/ ^ ^2^?05QA5 (^) OltOfi. Ml^lPy 'M^lhlh^ ba.^ o>|i.^(pA<R h^J.^ ^1^ ^ HSGH COURT OF CHHATTtSGARH. BILASPUR CORAM: Hon'bieShn !.M. Quddusi, J. & Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar SVIishra, J» APPELLANT F.A.(riNo.65of2010 Smt. Preetl Mishra. Versus RESPONDENT Devishankar Mishra. Shri Arun Kochar and Smt. Renu Kochar, c.ounsel for the appellant. Shri Ana.nd Pandey and Shri Malay Shrivastava, counsel for the respondent. (20/04/2011) Foiiowing orai order of the Court was passed by S. M. Quddusi. J. Learned counsel for the appeilant has moved a fresh application I.A. No.2 to the effect that the appeal be decided in terms of the compromise which has been made by the parties amicabiy and the compromise deed be made part ofthe record and decree. (2) The application for wlthdrawal of the first appeal is not pressed by her. (3) The parties have arrived at a compromlse in the te-ms and condltions mentioned in the compromise deed. (4) Both the partles are present in person. Appeliant Smt. Preeti Mishra has been identified by her leamed counsei Shri Arun Kochar and Smt. Renu Kochar and respondent Devishankar Mishra is himself an Advocate and identified by Shri Anand Pandey and Shri Ma!ay -Shrivastava, Advocates. (5) Both the parties, Smt. Preetl Mishra/appefiant and Shri Devishankar MIshra/respondent have admittedthat they have signed the compromlse deed and they have agreed wlth the conditions mentioned in the compromise deed. Pursuant to the same Shri Devishankar 2.- Msshra/respondent has handed over a draft No. 285810 dated 09/04/2011 of Rs.9.00,000/- issued by UCO Bank. Branch - Masturi in favour of Smt. Preeti Mishra payabie at Bilaspur 0260 which has been handed over to Smt. Preeti Mishra before the Court. (6) In view of the facts and circumstances mentioned above, the impugned decree is modified to the extent that the decree of divorce is granted wjth the conditions mentioned In the compromise deed dated 11/04/2011 verified today by the parties and their learned counsei which shall form part of the decree. (7) The appeal is disposed of in the above terms. (8) A decree be drawn accordingly. Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge ^r