IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No.14268 of 2011 Date of decision December 6, 2011 Dilbagh Singh ....... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ........ Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Ranjan Lakhanpal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashu Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. **** K. Kannan, J (oral). Counsel for the State points out that the prayer in the writ petition is to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and not to implicate him in a false case. The State in its reply stated that the petitioner is not wanted in any case nor is any case registered against the petitioner at Police Station Chabhal, District Tarntaran. The written statement has been filed by the Deputy Superintendent of Police and the same shall allay the fear of the petitioner that he is likely to be implicated in any false case. The writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 6, 2011 archana