IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2011 / 26TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 8159 of 2011(T) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- P.AYISHA, W/O.MOHAMMED, AGED 42 YEARS, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (URDU) (PART-TIME) MARKAZ GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KARANTHUR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED, SRI.V.K.GOPALAKRISHNAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 573. 3. THE MANAGER, MARKAZ GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KARANTHUR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 571. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. NISHA BOSE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/03/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 8159 of 2011-T - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of March, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner is working as a High School Assistant in the school managed by the third respondent. She was appointed from 1.6.2009 and the appointment was not approved in the light of the ban order issued by the Government dated 17.8.2005. It is the case of the petitioner that in terms of Ext.P1 Govt. Order, the appointment is liable to be approved. It is the further case of the petitioner that in terms of Ext.P1 Govt. Order, the Manager has executed a declaration, a copy of which has been produced as Ext.P2. 2. In a batch of cases in W.P.(C) No.2326/2010 and connected, this Court has upheld the validity of the said Govt. Order. 3. In that view of the matter, there will be a direction to the second respondent to consider the grant of approval of the petitioner's appointment if the Manager has already executed a bond as averred in the writ petition. Appropriate orders will be passed with notice to the Manager also, within a wpc 8159/2011 2 period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition for compliance. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/