1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.101 OF 2005 M/s.Boolani & Co. & ors. Petitioners Vs. Hiroo Hotchand Bakshani1 Respondent WITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.102 OF 2005 M/s.Boolani & Co. & ors. Petitioners Vs. Janki Hotchand Bakshani Respondent WITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.103 OF 2005 M/s.Boolani & Co. & ors. Petitioners Vs. Renu Mehtani Respondent WITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.104 OF 2005 M/s.Boolani & Co. & ors. Petitioners Vs. Pushpa Sadhvani Respondent WITH 2 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.105 OF 2005 M/s.Boolani & Co. & ors. Petitioners Vs. Pushpa Sadhvani Respondent Mr.Y.H.Vora for petitioners in all the matters. Mr.Parvathy Koushik for respondent in all the matters. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. August 08, 2005. P.C. . These civil revision applications challenging the common order passed by the learned Judge of the City Civil Court, Mumbai granting conditional leave to defendant are not maintainable. The learned counsel, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw with liberty. Leave granted with liberty as is available in law. The petitioners may apply to the Court below for extension of time on this count. (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) 3