IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2008 / 27TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 8193 of 2008(A) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ M/S KOLLAM INTERNET CABLE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, BISMILLAH BUILDING, SOOCHIKKARAN MUKKU, PALLITHOTTAM. P.O.,KOLLAM, REP.BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER-A.A. RAHIM. BY ADV. SRI.S.SANTHOSH KUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE CORPORATION OF KOLLAM, KOLLAM,REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY,CORPORATION OF KOLLAM, KOLLAM. 3. M/S RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS LTD. A&P ARCADE, SAHODARAN AYYAPPAN ROAD, KADAVANTHRA, KOCHI-16,REP.BY ITS AREA MANAGER. BY ADV.SRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHANDAS, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(c).No. 8193 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT Heard Sri.S.Santhosh Kumar, counsel for the petitioner and Sri.M.K.Chandramohan Das, standing counsel for the Kollam Corporation. Sri.S.Santhosh Kumar would submit that the decision which is mentioned as item No.4 in Ext.P5 has been taken by the Kollam Corporation in gross violation of the directions in Ext.P1 as well as in Ext.P4 interim order. According to him, M/s Reliance had not even applied in response to Ext.P3 tender notice which the Corporation had issued in response to Ext.P1 judgment. Standing counsel submits that the decision which is mentioned as item No.4 in Ext.P5 has nothing to do with drawal of cable TV connection, the said decision only permits Reliance, the applicant mentioned therein for drawal of telephone lines and Internet connections only. I record the submissions of the standing counsel and close the writ petition since it is seen that the petitioner cannot have any legitimate grievance regarding the decision in item No.4 in Ext.P5. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE sv.