1 Cri.WP976/2010 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.976/2010. (Babasaheb s/o Fakirrao Dabhade Vs. Mrs. Jaishri Babasaheb Dabhade) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Hemant Surve, Adv. for Petitioner; Mr.DR Markad, Adv. for Respondent. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 7 th March, 2011. ... 1) Heard both sides. 2) A question was put to the witness/wife enquiring as to whether she has any documentary proof to demonstrate payment of dowry to the husband. The learned Judge rejected the same, which is impugned in the present writ petition. 3) Since the proceedings itself are to be disposed of within time frame of two months, the time that has been consumed by the parties litigating, is enormous. The matter could have been resolved at the initial stage itself. Consequently, the learned Judge, seized with the matter, shall ensure to allow the question - “whether the wife – Jaishree has any documentary proof about extending dowry.”. 2 Cri.WP976/2010 4) The learned Judge shall allow the above question and proceed ahead with the case. The impugned order, for the present, needs no comments. However, the learned Judge shall not be influenced with the observations made in impugned order below Exhibit-21. 5) Parties to appear before the learned Judge on 16th March, 2011. Needless to say, the learned Judge, shall follow and adhere to the statutory time frame in disposing of the matter. 6) Criminal Writ Petition allowed to the extent indicated above. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/