IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9512 of 2008. Decided on: 13.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Jia Lal Thakur. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. None for respondent No.4. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): The petitioner has assailed the action of respondent- department whereby respondent No.4 was being given promotion before the petitioner. It has come in the reply that the case of the petitioner is still under consideration. However, no final decision has been taken as yet. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-department to take a final decision in the matter in accordance with law within a period of two months after the production of 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - certified copy of this judgment. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 13, 2010. (sck).