Civil Revision No.1705 of 2011(O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Civil Revision No.1705 of 2011(O&M) Decided on : March 11, 2011 Virender @ Manoj Kumar and another ... Petitioners VERSUS Ishwar Singh and another ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Sanjay Mittal, Advocate for the petitioners. A.N.JINDAL, J.- Heard. The documents sought to be produced by the petitioners – defendants (herein referred as `the petitioners') are such type of documents, which neither can be procured illegally, nor forged at any stage. These are the copies of the public record. Earlier, Niranjan Lal (since deceased) was a party and on his death, the petitioners were inserted at his place as his legal representatives and despite due diligence, they could not produce the documents in question i.e, Jamabandis for the years 1970-71, 1975-76, 1990-91, 2005-06 and mutation No.610 and 428. The documents appear to be essential for just decision of the case and to determine the real question, “as to whether the suit property is co-parcenary or not?” Civil Revision No.1705 of 2011(O&M) [ 2 ] In the circumstances, without delving deep into the matter, this petition is allowed and the plaintiff-petitioner is granted opportunity to prove the documents in question by way of additional evidence within three months from today, subject to payment of Rs.5,000/-. This petition is disposed of without issuing notice to the respondents with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondents as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. Still, if dissatisfied, the respondents may move this court for recalling this order. March 11, 2011 ( A.N.JINDAL ) `gian' JUDGE