o^' 1 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) N0. Sq 6L( / 2009 PETITIONER \^'6^l^g ^^y^"" ,.'^--^>'" y •ffle- ^\®'A---'RESPONDENTS /'' Ashok Sharma, S/o Shri Baijnath Sharma, aged about 47 years, presently working as in-charge C.M.0. Pandariya Nagar Panchayat, Dist. Kabirdham (C.G.) VERSUS 1) State of Chhattisgarh - through the Secretary, Urban Administration and Development Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) •2) Additional Secretary, Urban Administration and Development Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 3) Commissioner, Urban Administration and Development Department, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 4) Srinivas Patel, Revenue Inspector, presently working as incharge C.M.0., Nagar Palika, Kirandul, Dist. Dantewada, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ART1CLE 226 OF THE *^a; ^»° 5:[1^F "^T ^'^I^' 7Tsi7 STTc(^? K;s'<EH^i .i' T=T "4|A||d'4, a'flly'Ko, la|<?liy'J,< ^...u:&..^.^.-^^.. TW N 'qiTwf ^ 're^ <r"f^i< i? sifgir sn^r SB : HON'BLB SHRI JUSTICB frRITINKER DIWAKBR 28.07.2009 30.6.2009 (Annexure P/1) pass petitioner who is working as Panchayat has been transferred Shri Ashish Surana, couijisel for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh Th^kur, Dy. A.G. for the State. Challenge in the pres^nt petition is to the order dated ed by respondent No.2 by which the Incharge C.M.O. Pandariya Na^r to Nagar Panchayat, Baikunthpur as Chief Clerk-cum-Accountant. Contention of counsel foi) the petitioner is that the petitioner is a victim of frequent transfer. H}s contends that in last four years he has been transferred five times) from one place to another plaoe. He contends that the transfer | order has been issued just to accommodate reapondent No.f who is adinittedly junior to the petitioner. Contention of counsel fcjr the State is that let the petitioner make a representation to the r+spondent No. 2 and the same would be decided in acoordance with l^w. Counsel for the petition^r SLgrees to make a represaitation. However he submits that till petitioner may be given some p4>tective order. Accordingly, the petition his representation is decided, the is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a represent^tion within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of the cop|)r of this order, the saine would be decided by the authorities concjemed within a period of three weeks from the date of its receipt. Till |Aen the impugned ordershall not be given efiect to and the petitic^ier would be aUowed to perform his duties in the present place of pc|sting \ Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge ^' k'—