:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3226 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3226 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3226 OF 2004 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 993 OF 2004 FIRST APPEAL NO. 993 OF 2004 FIRST APPEAL NO. 993 OF 2004 The Sangli Bank Ltd. & Anr. ..Appellants versus Shivram V. Rajopadhe ..Respondent Mr. D. Punamiya i/b. R. M. G. Law Associates for the Appellants. Mr. A. M. Kulkarni for the Respondents. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. DATE : 27TH OCTOBER,2005 DATE : 27TH OCTOBER,2005 DATE : 27TH OCTOBER,2005 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. This is an application for stay. Counsel for the appellants state that the Appellants have deposited the decretal amount before the trial court. Stay order to continue till disposal of the appeal. Civil Application disposed of. :2: 3. Counsel for the Respondent orally requested that the respondent be permitted to withdraw the amount. The amount is regarding his wages. This oral application made by the counsel for the respondent is opposed by the counsel for the appellants on the ground that there is no urgency and that the respondent can apply before the proper court in a proper manner. When the decree is for wages. There is dire need for the Respondent to get the amount, therefore oral request made by the counsel for the respondent is allowed. Respondent is permitted to withdraw the amount from the trial court on furnishing security to the satisfaction of the trial court. 27.10.2005 (D.G. DESHPANDE, J.)