jpc ba776-11.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINALBAIL APPLICATION NO. 776 OF 2011 Vikrant D. Jadhav ... Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. Nitin Shejpal, for the applicant Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for the State CORAM:- A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED :- 11th August, 2011. P.C. : 1. Heard Mr. Shejpal, the learned advocate for the applicant and Mr. Saste, the learned APP for the State. 2. I have gone through the bail application and the annexures thereto. 3. A prima facie case exists against the applicant. Additionally, it is submitted that four previous criminal cases are pending against the applicant. Charge-sheet has already been filed on 15/3/2011. 4. In my opinion, it would be proper to direct the trial to be expeditiously held, rather than directing the release of the applicant on bail. If the trial is not over within stipulated period, the prayer for bail can be favourably considered. jpc ba776-11.sxw 2 5. The application is rejected. 6. The Magistrate is directed to expedite the trial and complete it within a period of three months from today. 7. Liberty to apply afresh for bail, should the trial be not over within that time. (A.M. THIPSAY, J.)