IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1521 of 2004 Date of decision: 26th August, 2009 Bhagwan Singh and others … Petitioners Versus Sunil Kumar and others … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioners has relied upon “Dr. Ashok Kumar Goyal v. Arya Mittar and others” 2007 (2) RCR (Civil) 798 to say that if Karta of the family has sold land due to legal necessity, there is no need to affix the ad-valorem Court fee. Learned counsel has further stated that during the pendency of the present revision petition, the suit preferred by the plaintiff was dismissed and thereafter, first appeal filed by the plaintiff was allowed. Petitioners, being the defendants to the suit, have filed a Caveat Petition in this Court. Whether the Court fee is to be paid ad-valorem or not ? is a question, which can be decided in appeal. Therefore, the defendants will be at liberty to raise this argument in the appeal. With these observations, present revision petition is disposed of. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE August 26, 2009 rps