The Hon’ble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy Writ Petition No.27374 of 2009 Order: The petitioner was accorded permission to construct ground and the first floors on the premises bearing Door No.5-121, Arukalla Mandapam Veedhi, East Street, Gudur, S.P.S., Nellore District, by the first respondent, on 26-08- 2008. The construction was completed in accordance with the plan. The petitioner intended to construct second floor. Alleging that the construction was being taken up without permission, the respondent issued Provisional Order No.UC/13/09/G1, dated 19-05-2009, requiring the petitioner to stop the construction. It is stated that the petitioner submitted application on 09-06-2009 seeking permission to construct the second floor. Thereafter correspondence ensued and the petitioner claims to have submitted all the particulars. The construction is said to have been resumed in August, 2009 and completed shortly thereafter. The first respondent issued notice, dated 03-12-2009, to the petitioner proposing to demolish the second floor. The same is challenged in this Writ Petition. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The construction of ground and the first floors made by the petitioner is on the basis of permission granted by the first respondent on 26-08-2008. Though the construction of the second floor is said to have commenced without permission, the petitioner did submit an application seeking permission on 09-06-2009. It is stated that the petitioner’s application was not processed thoroughly on the ground that the relevant file is not available. Be that as it may, the petitioner resumed construction and completed the second floor. This is not a case where any deviation on the ground is found or that any new construction is made over a plot without permission. The dispute is only about the second floor, which is already constructed. Even now, the respondent can verify the premises and find whether there are any constructions contrary to the relevant byelaws. If the construction is otherwise in accordance with the byelaws, the permission can be accorded duly collecting the fee. On the other hand, if any deviations are noticed, the petitioner can be required to remove them and renew her request for grant of permission after compliance. This exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from today. Till such time, the respondent shall not proceed against the building. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________________ (L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J) Dated 17-12-2009 lur