IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4527of 2010 Date of Decision: 18th July,2011. Bharat Bhushan ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & Others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Present: Mr.K.S.Jetley Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Ajay Nara Advocate for HUDA. * * * Nirmaljit Kaur, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly states that the notice was issued only qua the question of subsistence allowance. Thereafter, the respondents have started paying 50% of the basic salary as the subsistence allowance to the petitioner. However, he is still aggrieved as the said subsistence allowance is not in accordance with the Fundamental Rules 53 reproduced in para 14 of the petition. In view of the short prayer, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned authorities to decide the quantum of subsistence allowance keeping in mind the Fundamental Rules 53 in accordance with law within one month from the receipt of copy of the order. (Nirmaljit Kaur) 18th July, 2011. Judge Seema-II