IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10824 of 2002 VIJAY KUMAR SINHA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The District Judge, Nawadah. ………… Respondents. ----------- 3/ 28/2/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. It is the case of the petitioner that he was engaged as a generator and Xerox machine operator in the judgeship of Nawadah on 11.8.1997 and worked in that capacity till July, 2002 on daily wages. It is his further case that he also worked as a night guard for certain periods. It is his further case that an advertisement was issued inviting applications for appointment on Class-4 posts in the said judgeship. He acknowledges receipt of the interview letter dated 30.4.2002, at annexure-3, but alleges that he has not been provided appointment. Learned counsel for the State rightly points out that from the pleadings of paragraph-12 of the writ application it is apparent that the case of the petitioner was considered by the selection committee. Quite obviously, when the selection committee did not find him fit for appointment, the question of providing him appointment does not arise. He had only a right to be 2 considered, which has been done. If the petitioner had worked for any period in the judgeship of Nawadah on daily wage basis, as claimed by him, quite naturally, he is entitled to his remuneration for the days that he worked. This Court finds no merit in this application to the extent that the claim for regular appointment on a Class-4 post is concerned. To that extent, the writ application is dismissed. This Court, however, considers it proper to direct that the District Judge, Nawadah shall examine the official records with regard to the days that the petitioner actually worked on daily wages and pay the legitimate dues of the petitioner for that period within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, if not already paid. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)