:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4809 OF 2003 Kamlakar Baburao Pangarkar alias Kamlakar Keshumal Khatod ..Petitioner Vs. 1. Vijay Eknath Pawar and ors. ..Respondents Mr. S.M. Gorwadkar for petitioner. Mr. J.N. Pawar for resondent no.1. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. Date : June 28, 2007. Date : June 28, 2007. Date : June 28, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Gorwadkar the learned counsel for the petitioner. By the impugned order the petitioner-opponent no.1 was directed to lead evidence before taking cross examination of opponent no.3 on the next date. This order was passed on 21/3/2003 and for the last more than four years this petition is waiting for admission. On account of the ad-interim order passed by this Court on 14/7/2003 the ongoing enquiry in Enquiry Application No. 33 of 1998 before the Competent Authority at Nasik under the Maharashtra :2: Rent Control Act, 1999 was stayed. 2. No interference is called for in the impugned order. Petition is rejected summarily. Ad-interim order stands vacated. In case the proceedings are still pending, it is directed that the same be expedited and completed preferably within six months from today. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)