Petitioner Smt. Sheela Shukla, VV/o. Shri B.K. Shukla, aged about 62 years, Assistant Teac.her, Govt. Primary Sohool, Netnagar, Biock Education Officer, Pusour, Distt. Raigarh (CG). Vsrsus =/ Respondents 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretap/, School Educational Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). 2) Distnct Education Officer, Distriot Raigarh (CG). 3) Block Education Cfficer, Btock Pusour, District Raigarh (CG). (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) SB: Hon'bie Mr. SaCsh K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Sanjay Pate!, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate for the State. (Passed on 12-3-2<»8) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as weit as learned oounsel appearing for the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts and question of law, involved in the present writ petition, are the same asto that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwa] Vs. Munteipai Corporation, Durg and another <200S (li) MPJR -CG 96]., which has been disposed of vide order dated 3-4-2006 and the order dated .7-2-2007 passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No. 697 of 2007 (A.N.V. Satyanarayan and others Vs. Stafe of Chhattisgarh and others). 2) Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bhardadwaj (supra) and A.N.V. Satyanarayan (supra), subiect to verification of the fact asto whether the petitioner has aoquired B.Ed/D.Ed/B.T.I./M.Ed. Examination Certificate on her own expenses, as per the Mifc-- % ^ ^^i § % ^ -'a%^ ^ .2-- cireulars dated 13-9-1974, 24-12-1998, and 1-3-1999 and further whether she has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to cost& --A. Raju Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 2 -—L^ 1