IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8096 of 2010 1. PRAN DUSADH, SON OF DOMAN DUSADH 2. JANARDHAN CHAMAR, SON OF SUKH DEO CHAMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25A and 26 of the Arms Act. Considering that the petitioners for misuse of privilege of bail for a period of about eight years and 15 years respectively, have remained in custody since 8.2.2010 and undertake not to default in future, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Fast Track Court No. IV, Gaya, in Sessions Trial No. 93 of 2010 arising out of Civil Line P.S. Case No. 354 of 1987 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release 2 in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. The court below is directed to conclude the trial within a period of nine months positively in view of the fact that the occurrence is of the year 1987 and the petitioners are to be well represented on each date during trial. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)