Crl. Misc. No.M-19805 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-19805 of 2009 Date of Decision: 11.01.2010 Deepak Aggarwal and others ....Petitioners Versus The State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Vipul Dharmani, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G., Punjab Mr. Navin Garg, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the FIR No.33 dated 16.05.2006 under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC at Police Station Division No.2, Ludhiana and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise entered into between the parties. The FIR was registered against the present petitioners by respondent No.2-Puja Garg daughter of Sh. Om Parkash. Thereafter, the parties have entered into a compromise before the Mediation Centre with the intervention of the mediator and the respectable persons of the area. As per the compromise, the complainant respondent No.2-Puja Garg does not wish to pursue the above mentioned FIR against the petitioner. An affidavit was also executed affirming the factum of compromise and the Crl. Misc. No.M-19805 of 2009 2 same is placed on record as P-3. A separate statement of respondent No.2-Puja Garg has also been recorded. It is duly stated by her that the matter has been compromised and she has no objection, if the said FIR is quashed. The present FIR arises out of the matrimonial dispute. The matter having been compromised, it is fit case where there is no impediment in the way of the Court to exercise its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of the FIR. The Full Bench of this Court, in the case of Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 has held that the compromise, in a modern society, is the sine qua non of harmony and orderly behaviour. It is the soul of justice and if the power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C is used to enhance such a compromise which, in turn, enhances the social amity and reduces friction, then it truly is “finest hour of justice”. Disputes which have their genesis not only in matrimonial discord but others as well, such compromise deserves to be accepted. It is further held as under :- “ The only inevitable conclusion from the above discussion is that there is no statutory bar under the Cr.P.C which can affect the inherent power of this Court under Section 482. Further, the same cannot be limited to matrimonial cases alone and the Court has the wide power to quash the proceedings even in non- compoundable offences notwithstanding the bar under Section 320 of the Cr.P.C in order to prevent the abuse of law and to secure the ends of justice.” In the case of Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab 2008(4) S.C. Cases 582, the Apex Court emphasised and advised as under :- “ We need to emphasise that it is perhaps advisable that in disputes where the question involved is of a purely personal nature, the court should ordinarily accept the terms of the Crl. Misc. No.M-19805 of 2009 3 compromise even in criminal proceedings as keeping the matter alive with no possibility of a result in favour of the prosecution is a luxury which the courts, grossly overburdened as they are, cannot afford and that the time so saved can be utilised in deciding more effective and meaningful litigation. This is a common sense approach to the matter based on ground of realities and bereft of the technicalities of the law.” In the present case, the dispute arises out of the matrimonial dispute. The same has been compromised. In view of the settled position of law, it would be just and proper to quash the FIR for peace, harmony and thus allow the parties to move on in life. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.33 dated 16.05.2006 under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC at Police Station Division No.2, Ludhiana and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed in the interest of justice. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 11.01.2010 JUDGE gurpreet