... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.128 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.128 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.128 OF 2006 IN IN IN CONTEMPT CONTEMPT CONTEMPT PETITION NO.165 OF 2006 PETITION NO.165 OF 2006 PETITION NO.165 OF 2006 .................................................................. Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. .................................................................. Shri D.D.Bhosale for the Petitioner. Shri Girish Godbole for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Shri A.A.Joshi for the Respondent Nos.7,8, 9 and 11. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : MARCH 20, 2007. : MARCH 20, 2007. : MARCH 20, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocates appearing for the parties. The present Application for amendment of the Contempt Petition is not tenable in law and the same is rejected only on that ground. The rejection of the Application cannot preclude the Petitioner from filing appropriate proceeding as against the fifth Respondent. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE