IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PIL PIL PIL WRIT PETITION NO. 89 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 89 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 89 OF 2006 Francis Anthony Xavier ... Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. A. Upadhyay for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Bhimekar i/b. Wadia Ghandy & Co. for respondent Nos. 3 & 4. Mr. M. More, AGP for respondent No.1. Mrs. A.K. Savla for respondent No.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 11th September, 2006 : 11th September, 2006 : 11th September, 2006 P.C. . If the petitioners have any complaint that private respondents are putting constructions on the reserved plots and using FSI of reserved plot, they can filed complaint to respondent No. 2 within two weeks from today. If such complaint is filed, respondent No. 2 after hearing the petitioners and respondent Nos. 3 & 4 to dispose of the same at any rate not later than six weeks from today. He may also note that on 12.05.2006 statement on behalf of respondent Nos. 3 & 4 was recorded that plot reserved for maternity home abuts the plots which they are developing and that they shall not use FSI of the plot which is reserved for maternity home. That statement was accepted. ( 2 ) 2. Considering the above, petition is disposed of. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]