IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6940 of 2011. Decided on: August 24, 2011. Raj Kumar. Versus State of H.P. & ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Singh. For the petitioner: Mr. Avneesh Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG & Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG for respondent No. 1. Mr. Janesh Mahajan, CGC, for respondents No. 2 & 3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayers:- “1. Writ in the nature of mandamus be issued to Respondent No. 1,2 and 3 to investigate the whole matter whether respondent company is following the mandatory condition of employing 70% Bonafide Himachali workers discussed in industrial policy-2004 and takes stringent action against company to honour industrial policy. Incentives, concessions and benefits which are made available to company be stopped and benefits which company has already availed be recovered from company with interest. 2. Respondent No. 1 be directed to compel respondent company to honour and obey industrial poicy-2004 and allow Bonafide Himachali workers to work in the company.” 2. In case the industrial policy of 2004 is still in force and in case the same is not implemented, it is for the petitioner to approach the policy maker to see that the policy is implemented. This Court cannot issue a writ to compel the State to implement its policy. It is for the policy maker to take steps in the matter. Therefore, without prejudice the liberty to the petitioner to approach the first respondent or competent authority, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. August 24, 2011. ( Justice Rajiv Sharma), (vs) Judge.