IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No. 16221 OF 2009 Between: Ch.Adi Reddy …… petitioner AND The Station House Officer, P.S.Atmakur, Warangal District and others ......Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following:- THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH W.P. No.16221 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petition has been filed seeking to issue Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not granting Police protection to the petitioner to safeguard his right over suit schedule property in Survey Nos. 826/B, 826/C and 826/D the total Acs.1-36 guntas situated at Atmakur village and Mandal of Warangal District, as illegal, irregular and against the principles of natural justice and consequently to direct the respondents 4 and 5 not to interfere with the peaceful possession of the petitioner’s suit schedule land. The case of the petitioner is that he is the absolute owner and possessor of certain land mentioned hereabove that was purchased through a registered sale deed from the 4th respondent. It is submitted that after purchasing the said land, though the respondents 4 and 5 have no manner of right over the said land and colluded with each other, they are illegally trying to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property in question, as the escalation of the value of the property in question. It is also submitted that the subject matter of the property in question is pending before the Court of law and there is an adinterim injunction in favour of the petitioner. In this regard, the petitioner approached the official respondents 1 to 3 to assist him in giving Police protection against the respondents 4 and 5. As there is no action on the part of the official respondents, the petitioner has come up with the instant writ petition. The learned Government pleader for Home, appearing on behalf of the official respondents, 1 to 3, based on the written instructions received by him from the 1st respondent, Station House Officer, submits that the petitioner never approached the Police authorities, before filing the present writ petition. It is also submitted by him that a representation dated on 11-08-2009 is submitted by the petitioner requesting the Police authorities to provide him the Police protection and the Police authorities are taking necessary action on the said representation. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home and perused the material on record. The main grievance of the petitioner in the instant writ petition is that though he approached the Police authorities to provide him Police Aid, the Police authorities have not taken any action for which, the learned Government Pleader submitted that the petitioner never approached the Police authorities, before filing the present writ petition, and after filing the present writ petition only, the petitioner made a representation to them. From a perusal of the record, it is obvious that the present writ petition is filed on 06.08.2009 and the representation is made by the petitioner is on 11.08.2009. There is no evidence to show that the petitioner had approached the Police authorities, prior to filing of the instant writ petition, to say that the official respondents have failed to take any action at his request. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, I deem it appropriate to direct the official respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation dated 11.08.2009 submitted by the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation dated 11.08.2009 submitted by the petitioner and take necessary action, in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________________ JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH September 22, 2009. IVD/LSK