IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42508 of 2010 MADAN MANDAL SON OF RAM CHANDRA MANDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SAKAHRA KALYAN TOLA, POLICE STATION BARIARPUR, DISTRICT MUNGER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.24749 of 2010 SANJAY MANDAL S/O SHRI BASUDEO MANDAL R/O VILLAGE SAKAHRA KALYAN TOLA, P.S. BARIARPUR, DISTT. MUNGER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.1.2011. Heard Shri Sanjeev Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioners in both the cases as well Shri Anant Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. By filing two petitions, aforesaid two petitioners had prayed for granting bail in Bariyarpur P.S. Case No.99 of 2009, which was registered for the offence under Section 302 and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. In the present case, F.I.R. was lodged on the basis of fardbeyan of one Amod Mandal wherein he alleged that in his presence, his brother-in-law was surrounded by about seven accused persons including both the petitioners and thereafter, accused Paro Singh @ Pramod Singh fired on temporal region of his brother-in-law i.e. Chandan 2 Kumar. Subsequently, one Sanjay Mandal, son of Chhote Mandal fired on the back of brother-in-law of the informant. Against Madan Mandal, who is petitioner in Cr. Misc. No.42508 of 2010, allegation is that he fired on informant and others, but none received any injury. So far as Sanjay Mandal in Cr. Misc. No.24749 of 2010 is concerned, there is general and omnibus allegation. No any specific act has been alleged against him. Shri Sanjeev Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioners, while pressing the petition, submits that in police station, this informant had given information regarding murder of his brother-in-law by some un-known accused persons. Subsequently, fardbeyan, at the place of occurrence, was recorded in which he described regarding the occurrence and named the petitioners and others. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail. However, he is not disputing the fact that informant had himself initially informed the police. Thereafter, a station diary entry 3 N.H./ was made, which has been recorded in paragraph-1 of the case diary. In view of the facts and circumstances, let both the petitioners above named be enlarged on bail on their furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.II/C.J.M., Munger in Bariyarpur P.S. Case No.99 of 2009. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)