IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 1147 of 2006 Between: 1 Radha Krishna Reddy, S/o. Chench Ram Reddy R/o. Sridevi Bar & Restaurant, Abids, Hyderabad. 2 Soma Shanker, W/o. Bau Sarkar, R/o. Geethanjali Lodge Lodge Rooom No.208, Tilak Road, Abids, Hyd., N/o. Kidipur, (p)Khajipura, Tq., Kalikapur District, West Bengal. 3 Miladas, D/o. Sunil Das, R/o. Geethanjali Lodge, Tilak Road, Abids, 24 Paragana, West Bengal. 4 Smt., Reshma, W/o. Yousf Khan, R/o. Surya Nagar , Chikkadpally 1/A, Toofsia, Calcutta State, W.B., 5 Smt. NishaDay, W/o. Gopal Day, R/o. Susrya Nagar, Chikkadapally Hyd, N/o. Kadakpur, Minnapur (Dist, West Bengal State. 6 Smt. Susmitha Das, W/o. Santhosh Das, R/o. Geethanjali Lodge, Tilak Road, Abids,Hyd., N/o. (v) Chanda Dist, Nudia., West Bengal. 7 Bau Sankar, W/o. Pradeep Sarkar, R/o. Susrya Nagar, Chikkadapally Hyd, N/o. (V) Dum Dum Culcutta-28. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND State of A.P., by the S.H.O., P.S. -Abids, Through it's P.P., .....RESPONDENT Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased toto call for the records relating to CC.No. 1523 of 2004 on the file of the II Addl.Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad and quash the same by declaring as illegal, untenable and void The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.NARASIMHA RAO & ASSOCIATES, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY Crl.P.No. 1147 of 2006 O r d e r: There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. The petition is filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.1523 of 2004 on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. As there is no stay of the proceedings, the matter must have become infructuous by now; otherwise also there is no justification to interfere in the matter at this length of time. 2. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. November 13, 2009. *BVS