IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.28609-M of 2010 Date of Decision:13.10.2010 Rakesh Kumar .... Petitioner Versus Subhash Kumar Bansal .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Ms. Pooja Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Jain, Advocate for the respondent. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for setting aside order dated 30.8.2010 passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Patiala, whereby the cross examination of the complainant was closed by the Court. Learned counsel for the respondent has pointed out that the petitioner was granted ample opportunities but in spite of the same defence counsel did not cross examine the complainant. However, learned counsel for respondent in all fairness states that they have no objection if one last opportunity is granted to the petitioner subject to heavy costs. In view of the above and taking into account the facts of the case, order dated 30.8.2010 passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Patiala is set aside. The petitioner is granted one last opportunity to cross examine the complainant subject to the payment of Rs.10,000/- as costs. Allowed in the aforesaid terms. 13.10.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE