IN THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT OF lUDICATURE^AT^BJLASPUR BETWEEN •iA/'P.Ai-. •• 103^/0''!. PETITIONER RESPONDEfNT-gi ..^^C:, rTD:?'""-&<^s<»"* ^.y^^.-s^^ ^^]^-- '&^"""^' ,: / €••• \. .<^. ~- •^^' .>A.° <? "v ws^ l^f' Sy. ^ ". c? NIRMAL KUMAR KHARE AGED: 36 YEARS SONOFLATE SHM B.L.KHARE POSTEDAS - ASSISTANT TEACHER AT: GOVT. fflGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL DHANGAON,DISTT: RAJNANDGAON RESIDENT OF. MAIN ROAD TULSIPUR, WARDN0.16 NEAR PARAMOUNT TAILORS, RAJNANDGAON (C.G) VERSUS 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH - THE SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT D.K.S.BHAWAN, RAIPUR (C.G.) 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER RAJNANDGAON (C.G) 3. THE PRINCIPAL GOVT. H.S.SCHOOL, DHANGAON, DISTT; RAJNANDGAON (C.G) t»» ^^' •^••* ^WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE-226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ;/ . ./ (^ •^' •^-;s<H':?^ ^ST^TH ^T<^??^T'% 1 75? ^T4I^TTT, ^^tWT6, 1'^TTFPK W.ANo. l032-/2^-o^ o § ^€sll^ 33^200 V (^qqSj^S) 'y?a'^'? ~<T'r^a' ^i^ '^I^?^si"R '^l'^^fT? J^^ Tl'^t^H ^ -StRT^i 3?iq^T Shri. R.S. Patel, counsel for the petitioner. -» Shri Raiesh Paadev, Govjt. Advocate for fhe State. Heard. Counsel for the petitioder submits that the petitioner was mutuaUv traasferred bv Stfcte as per aanexure P/3 dated 4.10.2002, but subsequently order daled 17.02.2003 (amiexure P/ 1) whereby the petitioner wtis posted ia the previous place aiid has been rclicvcd. Counsel fuither subnuts that tlic petitioiicr has I 1 submltted a representation-dated 27.2.2003 (aunexure P/9) before i . / resuoudent No.l, which has r|ot been decided so far, as such the petitioner has filed fhis petitioi^ aiid fhe niatter is pendias. Counsel i rurtlier subinits that tJtie pet^tioner had lautuaUv tran.sferred by Statc aad rcUcviaR oj-dcr has qlso passed bv fhe District Educatiou Officer, RainandRaon but he hfas not been reUeved. Also heard on M.W. P.JNO. 904/2003 for graat of interim reUef. i 1 Having considered the facts and circuiiistances of fhe case g aud witiiout cxprcssing any oi:suuon on thc incrits of fhc casc, ia tfae opinion of this Court eu|ds of tustice would be served tf a direction is given to responde^it No. l to decide fhe representation of the petitioner aad the petitioner iaay be to aBowed to luake a detailed repicsentation alongvl'ith a copy of this petition wifhiii a luonfh froin todav bcfore fhe doiapctcut authoritv/respondcut No. 1 and on such representatioi^ being ffled, the same shaU be ^•'"^ / .A i'^?j '^'f T5'??i^' "'£!?<°•?;a53iR? ssi NB Vatti »!!S<K|yiS I.P.No, l03X/5.^5 '3iit?I ?g?7 ("N^sST) ^^T^^ft^ ST?^i -i^l ^l^^^h 'R1T^if ^ t^s T^i??R A? S^i 3iR?l considercd aad decided bv jthe competent authority after heariug the petitioner as early as dossible preferably within two nionths 1 froia the date ofreceipt of refaresentation i& accordEunce wifh law. If [ anv grievancc stiU subsists; thc petitioner niay avail the reiuedv iinder the law. i Wifh fhe direction aibresaid, tliis oetition is disposed of, Consequently, M.W.P.^Jo. 904/2003 and I.A.No. 9321/2003 also staad disposed of. C.C. as pcrrulcs. | crii^ -—--- Fakhruddin Judge