IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 8TH MAY 2009 / 18TH VAISAKHA 1931 WP(C).No. 13318 of 2009(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- FAIZ.K, AGED 23 YEARS, S/O MUHAMMED MUSTAFA K., CRESCENT HOUSE, NEAR G.R.H.S.S., KOTTACKAL P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN - SC FOR UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).13318/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 8th day of May, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner was a student of B.Tech Engineering course at M.E.A. Engineering College, Perinthalmanna, for the period, 2002-06. Apparently, dissatisfied with the marks obtained in two papers, in the supplementary examination, June 2008, he had applied for revaluation. He is aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the B.Tech Engineering supplementary Examination, conducted in June 2008. Ext.P4 application for revaluation is pending before the respondents. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to publish the results of W.P.(C).13318/2009 2 the revaluation sought for by the petitioner in relation to the B.Tech Engineering supplementary Examination, June 2008, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the application for revaluation is in order and otherwise correct. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs