1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 4216/2009. ( Shivratan Sahkari Gruhinirman Sansths -: versus :- Vidyadevi K. Takrani and another ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 24, 2009. Heard Shri C.A. Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner. No body appears for respondent nos. 1 and 2, though they are served with notice of final disposal. Learned counsel for petitioner has invited attention to provisions of Section 40 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 and also to Annexure-2 (page no.27 with the petition) to show the document which the petitioner wanted to exhibit/prove in objection proceedings before the 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Akola in R.D.No. 279/2002. The copies of other documents stated to be xerox copies by Executing Court are not produced before this Court. The document produced and pointed out by learned counsel for petitioner is registration certificate of petitioner society. He states that xerox copy was placed on record and original was with the witness of petitioner and by comparing 2 the two, xerox copy could have been exhibited. In the circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to prove/exhibit said xerox copy by producing original before the trial Court. It is made clear that the order of said Court in relation to other documents or their copies is not disturbed, because the same does not appear to be either perverse or without jurisdiction. Subject to this liberty to petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of. It is made clear that the impugned order will not come in the way of the petitioner in proving/ exhibiting the xerox copy of the registration certificate of society. Rule accordingly, no costs. JUDGE Rgd.