IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4974 of 2003 1. NAND BIHARI JAISWAL S/O SHYAM BIHARIJAISWAL, R/O DIXON ROAD, MUNICHAK, BHAGALPUR 2. BEDA NAND PRASAD SAH S/O LATE RAMJILAL SAH, R/O HASSANGANJ, MIRZANHAT, BHAGALPUR 3. BHANWAR LAL PARIKH S/O LATE BALDEO PARIKH, R/O BANSHI JHA LANE, JOGSAR, DISTT- BHAGALPUR 4. SUNIL KUMAR NATH, S/O LATE BALA HAR NATH R/O RAJA S.N.ROAD, MOSAK CHAK, DISTT- BHAGALPUR 5. SUSHIL KUMAR CHAPARIA S/O SHRI SHANKAR LAL CHAPARIA, R/O URDU BAZAR ROAD, DISTT- BHAGALPUR 6. PAWAN KUMAR AGRAWAL S/O LATE SATYA NARAYAN AGRAWAL, R/O MOHALLA LAHERI TOAL DISTT- BHAGALPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THOROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, PATNA 2. THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVCT. OF BIHAR,PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BHAGALPUR—RESPONDENT 1ST SET 4. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER, EASTERN RAILWAYS, KOLKATTA 5. RAILWAY BOARD, RAIL BHAWAN, NEW DELHI THORUGH ITS CHAIRMAN 6. THE GENERAL MANAGER EASTERN RAILWAYS KOLKATA 7. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER (ENGINEERING) EASTERN RAILWAYS, MALDA, DISTRICT- MALDA- WEST BENGAL 8. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER, EASTERN RAILWAYS HAWRAH 9. THECHIEF ENGINEER, EASTERN RAILWAYS KOLKATA 10. THE DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, EASTERN RAILWAYS,HAWRAH 11. THE ESTATE OFFICER, EASTERN RAILWAYS HAWRAH----------- -----------------RESPONDENTS 2ND SET. ----------- WITH CWJC No.8849 of 2002 PETITIONER NOS. 1 TO 6 ARE THE SAME AS IN CWJC NO.4974 OF 2003 EXCEPT PEPTITIONER NO.7 7. PRADEEP KUMAR KESHRI S/O LATE BOTH NARAYAN LAL KHATRI R/O LAHERI TOLA, DISTT- BHAGALPUR----- PETITIONERS Versus RESPONDENT NOS. 4 TO 11 ARE THE SAME AS IN CWJC NO.4974 OF 2003 ----------- WITH CWJC No.13647 of 2003 NARMDESHWAR PRASAD SINGH S/O SHRI DEO NARAIN SINGH R/O OF STATION CHOWK, BHAGALPUR, PS- KOTWALI, DISTT- BHAGALPUR-----------------------PETTIIONER Versus RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 8 ARE THE SAME AS RESPONDENT NOS.4 TO 11 AND RESPONDENT NOS. 9 TO 11 ARE THE SAME AS RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 3 MENTIONED IN CWJC NO. 4974 OF 2003 ----------- FOR THE PETITIONERS: Mr. Rajendra Kumar Giri, Advocate FOR THE STATE: Mr. A. Amanullah,( SC-17) & Mr. M.K. Pathak, J.C. to SC-17 For the Railway: Mr. D.K. Sinha & Mr. Mahesh Prasad Advocates ---------- - 2 - 17 15.1.2009 After having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is not inclined to exercise its discretion where there are so many disputed facts which have been pleaded by either parties. Petitioners, if they are so advised may seek relief before the civil court of proper jurisdiction. These writ applications are disposed of with the above liberty. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)