IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO :617 of 2007 DATED: 05.01.2007 Between: Abdul Kareem. petitioner And Indian Bank rep by its Chairman And Managing Director and 3 others. Respondents. THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.617 of 2007 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled seeking a direction to the respondents to set aside the orders of the 4th respondent in proceedings No.CO:VIJ:VG:MOVVA 118:2005 dated 22-09- 2005 as confirmed by the 3rd respondent on 01-04-2006 and forwarded through Assistant General Manager vide their Ref: No.0067:VG:APP:2006 dated 03-04-2006 and in not considering the review petition dated 9-4-2006 made to the reviewing authority as bad and illegal, and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in his post and grant consequential benefits. The petitioner is a Branch Manager of the respondent bank of Movva of Krishna District. He states that he was transferred in March 2002, from Movva of Krishna District to Machavaram of Guntur District by degrading from Branch Manager to Asst. Manager without assigning any reasons and thereafter on 16-08-2002 he was given suspension order without issuing show cause notice. He further states that against the order dated 16-08-2002 he preferred appeal before the appellate authority, which was rejected. It is the grievance of the petitioner that against the order of the appellate authority on 9-4-2006 he preferred review petition/representation before the 2nd respondent- Executive Director, Indian Bank Head Oﬃce, Rajaji Salai, Chennai, but so far no orders are passed on the said review petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Bank. Inasmuch as the review preferred by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent/Executive Director, Indian Bank Head Oﬃce, Rajaji Salai, Chennai is pending consideration and the same is admitted to by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Bank, without going into the merits of the writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the direction as under: The 2nd respondent/Executive Director/Review Authority, Indian Bank Head Oﬃce, Rajaji Salai, Chennai is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on the review petition ﬁled by the petitioner, if not already disposed of, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _____________ (N.V.RAMANA,J) DATE: 05-01-2007 Grk/TVK