IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.1493 of 2005 Between: Bandi Parvatham, w/o. Late Venkata Rao, R/o. Pragadapalli, Polavaram Mandal, W.G.District. ..... PETITIONER AND The Settlement Officer/Revenue Divisional Officer, Jangareddygudem, W.G.District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue order, direction or writ more particularly writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not considering the claim petition filed by the petitioner as illegal arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of Regulations 2/70 and consequentially direct the respondent to considering the case of the petitioner for Grant of Ryothwari Patta in respect of the land situated in R.S.No.294/1 Ac. 3.36 cts of pragadapalli village, Polavaram Mandal, W.G.District. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.R.K.AMERANDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent : GP FOR REVENUE The Court at the stage of admission made the following : ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. As can be seen from the material on record, the petitioner filed the claim petition only on 18.01.2005. Hence, I am unable to hold that there is any inaction on the part of the respondent as on today. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the respondent to take appropriate action on the application of the petitioner, dated 18.01.2005 in accordance with law. Liberty is given to the petitioner to initiate fresh proceedings in case necessity thereof arises. __________ 03.02.2005 sh To 1. The Settlement Officer/Revenue Divisional Officer, Jangareddygudem, W.G.District. 2. Two C.Cs. to the G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 3. CD copies