IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40605 of 2009 CHOTU @ INDRADEO TANTI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 09.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a police case under Section 394 of the Penal Code against unknown, in custody since 13.5.2009 is that there is no T.I.P, no recovery from him. The impugned order of rejection only notices that his name has come during course of investigation and charge-sheet has been submitted without any discussion of the nature of the materials against him which learned counsel for the State points out is the own confession of the petitioner before the Police. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Jamui in connection with Laxamipur P.S. Case No. 181 of 2008. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)