IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 8836 of 1999 Between: 1 Shaik Peda Hussain Saheb, S/o. Late Madar Saheb as Sethsindi, Nagulavancha & Seethampet Villages, R/o. Seethampet Village, Chintakani Mandal, Khammam District. 2 Shaik Peda Mahaboob, S/o. Late Madar Saheb as Sethsindi, Nagulavancha & Seethampet Villages, R/o. Seethampet Village, Chintakani Mandal, Khammam District. 3 Shaik China Saheb, S/o. Late Madar Saheb as Sethsindi, Nagulavancha & Seethampet Villages, R/o. Seethampet Village, Chintakani Mandal, Khammam District. 4 Shaik Mogal Saheb, S/o. Late Madar Saheb as Sethsindi, Nagulavancha & Seethampet Villages, R/o. Seethampet Village, Chintakani Mandal, Khammam District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Commissioner of Land Revenue, A.P. Hyderabad. 2 The Joint Collector, Khammam. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer4, Khammam. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Chintakani Mandal, Khammam District. 5 Shaik Meera Saheb, S/o. Late Madar Saheb, R/o. Seethampet Village, Chintakani Mandal, Khammam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue Writ of Certiorari and call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings Rc.No.83/3364/98 dt. 24-3-99 of the 1st Respondent and proceedings Rc.No.A3/1222/98 dt. 13-11-98 of the 2nd Respondent and proceedings Rc.No.A2/1341/97 dt.23-10-97 of the 3rd Respondent and Memo No.A/1241/97 dt. 8-11-97 of the 4th Respondent and set-a-side the same by holding that the said impugned proceedings are illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and we are entitled for appointment as Village Servant /Sethsindi under Vathabandi System and pass such other order or further orders as may be deemed fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.CHINNA BABA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order: Since none appeared for the petitioners on 26-02-2008, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither the counsel for the petitioners is present nor is there any representation on his behalf. Hence the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ____________ 27-02- 2008 usd ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Commissioner of Land Revenue, A.P. Hyderabad. 2 The Joint Collector, Khammam. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer4, Khammam. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Chintakani Mandal, Khammam District. 5 Two CCs to G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 6 Two CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KRD}