FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WRIT PETITION NO.10638 OF 2010 LAXMAN SUDAMRAO PAWAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioner : Shri Bhadekar D.R. AGP for Respondent(s): Shri Dighe V.H. ... CORAM : D B BHOSALE & S B DESHMUKH, JJ. Dated: July 20, 2011 ... 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGP for respondents / State authorities. 2. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner has made the following prayer :- "(B) By issue of Writ of Certiorari, or Writ of mandamus or by issue of any other suitable writ, respondents be directed to take action against the Spurious / Bogus Cards / Units either under the new Clause 2(6) & 2(8) of the Annex to the PDS Control Order 2001 or under the old Clause 10 of the Maharashtra Scheduled Commodities (Regulation of Distribution) Order 1975 corrected upto 31.3.1995 subject to the proper and detail definition giving wider meaning of the said term Spurious / Bogus Cards / Units into multi - categorization." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not filed this petition in the nature of public interest. From bare perusal of the prayer, in our opinion, it is absolutely vague and cannot be considered in Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The submission of learned counsel that a detailed definition giving wider meaning FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS (2) WP/10638/2010 to the term "spurious / bogus" is necessary, is also devoid of merit. 4. In the circumstances, Writ Petition is dismissed. ( S B DESHMUKH, J. ) ( D B BHOSALE, J. ) akl