1 CRA-684-09.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 684 OF 2009 Balkrishna Ramchandra Sawant ... Applicant (Orig. accused) vs. The Sainik Sahakari Bank Limited Patsanstha, & Anr. ... Respondents Ms. Tejasweeta Kadam i/b. Shri Rahul S.Kate,Advocate, for the applicant Mr.Omkar Warange,Advocate for the respondent No.1 - State. Mr. P.S.Hingorani, APP, for the respondent No.2 State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 22nd March, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. On the complaint filed by the respondent No.1, the accused/applicant was prosecuted and convicted for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act by J.M.F.C. Satara and was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for four months and to pay fine of Rs.2,84,080/- to the complainant as compensation. The appeal filed by the accused was dismissed by the Sessions Court, Satara. 2 CRA-684-09.sxw 3. The compensation amount is equal to the cheque amount. The applicant is undergoing imprisonment. The learned Counsel for the applicant makes a statement that no amount has been deposited nor he is in a position to deposit the amount. The learned Counsel for the applicant/accused could not point out any illegality or irregularity in the impugned Judgment of conviction and sentence. 4. Therefore, the Revision Application stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)