IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 4TH DECEMBER 2008 / 13TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 RP.No. 1317 of 2008(P) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.14214/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER: THIRD PARTY: ------------------------------- RAJAPPA KAIMAL, SECRETARY, SPACE ENGINEERS' WELFARE SOCIETY, REG.NO.958/95, SARAS, PLRA 184, PANACHUMMOODU LANE, PATTOM.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS:: --------------------- 1. V.C.VIJAYAKUMAR, S/O.CHERLLAPPAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT MADHAVASARAS, KANJIRAMPARA.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,' PEROORKKADA POLICE STATION, PEROORKKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. HARIKUMAR, KARTHIKA, TC.12/663, MIRANDA JUNCTION, KANNUKUZHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN FOR R1 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: A.K. BASHEER & V. GIRI, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P. No. 1317 of 2008 in W.P(C). No.14214 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of December, 2008 Order Basheer, J: Heard learned counsel for the review petitioner and learned counsel for respondent No.1. 2. This petition for review has been preferred by the petitioner who claims that he is the Secretary of the Space Engineers Welfare Society, registered under the Travancore-Cochin Literary Scientific and Charitable Societies Act. It is contended by the review petitioner that the judgment in W.P.No.14214 of 2008 happened to be passed on the basis of some incorrect statements made by the writ petitioner. It is the case of the review petitioner that the writ petitioner had no manner of right or authority to convene the General Body Meeting of the Society. It is further contended that pursuant to the above judgment, the writ petitioner has been proclaiming that he has been duly elected as the Secretary of the Society. 3. We do not propose to refer to the various averments in the review petition, nor do we intend to deal with the contentions raised by respondent no.1 in the counter affidavit. 4. It is brought to our notice that there is a simmering dispute in the Society among various groups. It is also on record that the review petitioner and his supporters have already filed a suit for a declaration and and other allied reliefs challenging the election allegedly held pursuant to the order issued by this court in the writ petition. 5. While disposing of the writ petition we had only directed respondent No.1, Circle Inspector of Police, Peroorkkada Police Station to RP.1317/2008. : 2 : look into Ext.P1 and ensure that the members of the Society are in a position to transact the business in the general body meting to be held on May 10, 2008 without any hindrance from any side. 6. The above direction does not confer any manner of right or authority on any person to stake a claim to any office in the Society. Even the question whether the writ petitioner was entitled to convene the general body meeting or whether the meeting, if any, pursuant to that order would be valid or not etc. was not considered by us. It is made clear that it will be left to the parties to work out their respective rights and remedies before an appropriate court in other proceedings. With the above observation the Review Petition is closed. A.K. Basheer, Judge V. Giri, Judge an.