IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 11941 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.10.2010 Satyawan ...Petitioner Versus Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak and another ...Respondents Present: Mr. Naveen S. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Balram Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shirish Gupta, Advocate for respondent No. 1/University. ***** RANJIT SINGH J. Respondent No. 2 stands served but no one appears for respondent No. 2. Counsel for the University says that he need not to file reply as the University has taken a decision to regularise the admission of the petitioner. Since the necessary relief has been granted to the petitioner, the writ petition is rendered infructuous. The necessary consequential relief shall also follow. Dismissed as infructuous. October 26, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE