1 19 wp.2467.10 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2467 OF 2010 Rakesh Lilaram Rohira. ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent ----- Mr. Pankaj J. Das for the Petitioner. Mr. D.P.Adsule, APP for the State. ----- CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR and P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE : 05 th October, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned APP. Perused the FIR. 2 The only argument, which is canvassed before us is that the FIR has been registered in spite of the fact that no cognizable offence has been disclosed. It is not possible to accede to this argument on plain reading of the FIR. It is noticed that the allegation contained therein is in respect, inter-alia, using of corporator’s logo on the vehicle of the Petitioner and causing misrepresentation in that behalf. There are other facts stated in the FIR, which will have to be considered at the appropriate stage. Reliance placed on the documents at Exhibit-L and 2 19 wp.2467.10 Exhibit-H does not take the matter any further. Those documents can be relied by the Petitioner in his defence, which cannot be the basis to quash the FIR. In our opinion, this petition should fail. The same is therefore, dismissed. [ P.D. KODE, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]