IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.16220 of 2011 Date of Decision : September 02, 2011. Sukhwinder Kaur .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Anupam Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner and her husband both are working as Staff Nurse and M.L.T., respectively, in the Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of Punjab and are posted in the Primary Health Centre, Kasel, District Tarn-Taran. Both of them are statedly to be Physically Handicapped persons to the extent of 40% disability. They are said to have made certain complaints against the private respondents alleging harassment etc. As no notice has been issued to the respondents, therefore, no adverse orders can be passed against their interest at this stage and the allegations levelled by the petitioner cannot be accepted outrightly. The CWP No.16220 of 2011 [2] writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos.2 to look into the complaints made by the petitioner and take necessary remedial measures. This order, however shall not be interpreted to mean any direction adverse to the interest of respondent Nos.3 & 4. If the allegations made in the complaints by the petitioner are found to be false, it is obvious that no action can be taken against anyone pursuant thereto. The needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. September 02, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE