(L-fv^r^ SINGLE BEMCH IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) W.P.S. No. /2011 PETITIONER •^- ^€^^ -•rt,C'"3 ...••••"" ^y^^^ •^^..-•••"^ >^ RESPONDENTS Versus Raj Kumar Tiwari, S/o Late Shri Gulabchand Tiwari, aged about44 years, presently posted as a ABEO in OfBce ofBlock Education, Kota Bilaspur (C.G.), 1. State ofChhattisgarh, Through- Its Secretary, Department ofEducation, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. / '. 2. District census of&cer & Collector District Bilaspur (C.G.) Y 3.' District Educatioa of&cer, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Block Education ofBcer Block-Kota,Tahsil Kota Di'strict Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT m NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS. DIREGTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERS. The petitioner, above named, most respectfully begs to submit as under:- 1. PARTICULAR OF THE PETITIONER As mentioned infhe cause title. ^. HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR SINGLEBENCH : HON'BLE SHRI PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA. J. W.P.i'StNo.548of2011 PETITIONER Raj Kumar Tiwari. Versus RESPONDcNTS State of Chhattisgarhand others. WRITPErraONUNDERARTICLE2260FTHECONSTnrUTIONOFINDIA. Shri NeeraJ Ghoubey, counsel for petlttoner. Shri Shri A.V.^Shrkihar, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORALORDER (31ffl1/2011) Foliowing oral order of the Court was passed by Prashant Kumar Mishra. J. Heard. (2) The petitioner was transferred from the pret of Assistant Block Education Officer, Kota to Assisiant Project Coordinator, Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha r\4ission, Kabeerdham by an order dated 20 August, 2010. It appears that ihere is dispute about his relieving and subsequent cancellation of reiieving order. (3) According to the petitioner^since he was assjgned census work, neither he could have been transferred nor he could have been relieved in pursuance to the provisions of circular issued by the State Governmeni on 22nd June, 2010 (Annexure P/3). (4) Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the District Education Officer, Bilaspur has repeatedly been directingthe respondent No. 4 for cancellatlon of his reliving and for payment ofsalary. Such orders were issued by ihe Disfrict Education Officer on 27/10/2010 (Annexure P/7), 16/11/2010 (Annexure P/10) and by communication dated 03/12/2010 available at page 29 of paper book the respondent No. 4 has been directed to make payment of saiaryto the petitioner for the reievant period. (5) In viewofthe-above.thiswritpetitionis disposed ofwith a direction to the respondent No. 4 fo consider anddecide the question regarding payment of salary to the petitioner in view of the order passed by the District Education Officer vide Annexure P/7 and P/10 within a period offourweeks fromtoday. (6) Withthis observation, this writ petition stands disposed of. pra'-£rMtewa :1