IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19450 of 2009 PRAKASH MUNI, SON OF BACHCHI MUNI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHHOTI MALIYA, P.S. GOGARI, DISTRICT-KHAGARIA….PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR…………………………………….OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Mahendra Thakur, Advocate. For the State : Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. --------- 4. 27.10.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no recovery of any looted or incriminating articles from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and it is stated that he has only been implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion. It has also been submitted that though the petitioner is in jail custody since 27.2.2009, he has not been put on Test Identification Parade. Learned counsel for the petitioner urged that the petitioner has only been denied the privilege of bail by the court below on account of the fact that 2 he is accused in four other cases, however, he has been granted bail in all those cases. Learned A.P.P. for the State submitted that in paragraph-60 of the case diary, the name of the petitioner surfaced on the basis of some confidential report and from paragraph-83 of the case diary, it is manifest that he is also involved in four other cases. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Prakash Muni, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Khagaria, in connection with Gogri P.S. Case No.26/09 in G.R. No.293/09 , with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)