1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.298 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.70 OF 2006 New Padmavati Co-op Housing Society Ltd .. Plaintiff -versus Oberoi Constructions Pvt Ltd. and ors .. Defendants Mr. M.U. Pandey, for the Plaintiff. Dr. Birendra Saraf with H.J.Shah i/b I.C. Legal for defendant Nos l to 3. Mr. P.C. Modi, i/b Yogesh Adhia for defendant Nos l0 & 12. CORAM: R. G. KETKAR, J DATED: 11th September, 2009 P.C. 1. This Chamber Summons is taken out by the Plaintiffs praying for amendment of the plaint in terms of schedule of amendments annexed to the Summons. The suit was instituted on January 17, 2006 and the Chamber 2 Summons is taken out on February 28, 2007. 2. After hearing counsel for the parties, I am satisfied that the proposed amendment does not alter the nature of the controversy raised in the suit. For the purpose of determining the controversy raised between the parties, in my opinion the chamber summons deserve to be allowed. Hence the following order. ORDER I) The Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) with no order as to costs. II) The amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today and copy of the amended plaint be served to the defendants. III) The defendants will be at liberty file additional written statements, within 8 weeks from the receipt of the copy of the amended plaint. IV) Pending Notice of Motion No.117 of 200, taken out by the plaintiff, is to be heard on its own merits. (R.G. KETKAR, J)