HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR C.R.P.No.4488 OF 2006 ORDER : Notice was served upon the respondents. The respondents did not chose to make any representation. The revision is directed against the order in I.A.No.414 of 2004 in O.S.S.R. No.679 of 2004 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Ibrahimpatnam, Rangareddy District. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff. He laid a suit for cancellation of a sale deed together with a declaration and injunction in respect of an old house. The office of the Junior Civil Judge, Ibrahimpatnam raised certain objections. The revision petitioner would appear to have complied with the conditions. But, however, the compliance of the objections was with a delay of 36 days. Consequently, the petitioner filed a petition in I.A.No. 414 of 2004 under Section 148 C.P.C. to condone the delay in complying the objections. Through the impugned order dated 05.05.2006, the learned trial Judge dismissed I.A.No.414 of 2004 and consequently the OSSR No.679 of 2004 stood rejected. Where the delay was as small as 36 days and where the petitioner offered explanation for the condonation of delay, I am satisfied that the delay deserves to be condoned. It is settled law that condonation of delay shall be dealt with liberally. Where the delay is 36 days only, I deem it appropriate to condone the delay. Consequently, this revision is allowed. The delay in representing OSSR No.679 of 2004 is condoned. The learned Junior Civil Judge, Ibrahimpatnam shall check the compliance of the objections and shall number the suit, if the objections were properly complied with. No costs. ____________________ JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR 15th December 2010 PNV