IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2010 / 17TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 12063 of 2010(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ANU JOSE, AGED 34 YEARS, W/O. JOSE, OLLANGATTU HOUSE, MORACKALA KARA, KUNATTUNADU VILLAGE BY ADV. SRI.K.SUNILKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE KUNNATHUNADU GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KUNNATHUNADU, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683565 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE STATE OF KERALA THOUGH THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.12063 OF 2010 (G) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submitted Ext.P2 application for permit for construction of a compound wall. On receipt of the application, by Ext.P3, he was intimated of the defects by the Panchayat. Thereupon, he submitted Ext.P4 revised plan. Complaint is that even after submission of Ext.P4, orders have not been passed by the Panchayat and it is with that grievance the writ petition is filed. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, the defects pointed out in Ext.P3 have been rectified by Ext.P4, there is no reason for the Panchayat to delay in considering Exts.P2 and P4. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of this writ Petition directing the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P2 and P4, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :