: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9342 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.9342 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.9342 OF 2004 ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9343 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.9343 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.9343 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.9342 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.9342 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.9342 OF 2004 Smt.Kashibai Kashinath Survase ).. Petitioner Versus Amitkumar Shishir Gandhi and another ).. Respondents ALONG WITH ALONG WITH ALONG WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9343 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.9343 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.9343 OF 2004 Smt.Kashibai Kashinath Survase ).. Petitioner Versus Amitkumar Shishir Gandhi and another ).. Respondents Mr.Vijay Killedar i/b.Mr.Nitin Jamdar for the Petitioner. Mr.P.J. Das for Respondent No.1. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 19TH OCTOBER 2005 DATED: 19TH OCTOBER 2005 DATED: 19TH OCTOBER 2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Writ Petition No.9342 of 2004 has been filed against the decision of the Appellate Court in the Appeal filed from Regular Civil Suit No.1268 of 1987. This Suit was filed by the Petitioner for a declaration that she was a tenant of the suit premises. 2. Writ Petition No.9343 of 2004 has been filed : 2 : against the order of the Appellate Court arising from Regular Civil Suit No.275 of 1989 filed by the landlord. Both the Suits have been decided. The declaratory Suit filed by the Petitioner has been dismissed and the Suit for possession of the premises on the ground of bona fide requirement has been decreed. The trial Court had held that the Petitioner is a tenant under Section 5(11)(c) and had decreed the declaratory Suit. The Suit filed by the landlord was dismissed. The Appellate Court has reversed these findings vide its order dated 31st July 2004. 3. In the meantime, the Respondent No.1 filed Regular Darkhast No.95 of 2005 for recovering possession of the suit premises. The possession warrant has been executed and the Petitioner has already handed over possession of the suit premises. Thereafter, the suit premises have been demolished. In my view, nothing survives in the Writ Petitions which are rejected.