IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5704 OF 2009 Between: Rajesh B. Mehta ..... Petitioner/Plaintiff AND J. Jayapal ..... Respondent/Defendant The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5704 OF 2009 ORDER: Heard Sri D.S.N.V. Prasad Babu, learned counsel representing Sri T.V.K. Murthy, learned counsel for the Revision Petitioner and Sri B. Ratnakar, learned counsel representing Smt. N. Shoba, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The impugned order was passed in I.A.No.1152 of 2009 in O.S.NO.272 of 2009, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge's Court, Sangareddy, on 26.11.2009, ordering urgent notice to the respondent/defendant in the application for grant of a temporary injunction to restrain the defendant etc., from interfering with the possession of the petitioner/plaintiff over the suit schedule property. 3. The petitioner/plaintiff was aggrieved by the trial Court not considering the grant of an ex parte temporary injunction in view of the observation by the trial Court itself that admittedly he is the tenant of the suit schedule property owned by the respondent herein. 4. While ordering notice to the respondent in this revision petition, the status quo as on that day was directed to be maintained on 27.11.2009 in view of the petitioner being admittedly the tenant of the respondent in respect of the suit schedule property. 5. In view of that fact situation, it would be suffice to direct the trial Court to expeditiously determine the application itself on merits while continuing the order of status quo till the determination of the application by the trial Court in the interests of justice. 6. Therefore, status quo as on 27.11.2009 in respect of the suit schedule property in O.S.No.272 of 2009, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge's Court, Sangareddy, shall be maintained by both the parties till the disposal of I.A.No.1152 of 2009 in O.S.No.272 of 2009 on merits in accordance with law and subject to the final orders to be passed therein and the trial Court shall determine the said application on merits as expeditiously as possible after giving every reasonable opportunity to both the parties. 7. The Civil Revision Petition is ordered, accordingly, at the stage of admission. No costs. _______________________ (G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J) Dated: 23rd December, 2009. KL