IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 14TH MARCH 2008 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1929 W.P(C).No. 4088 of 2008(J) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- T.T. SAJEEV, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O. THANKAPPAN, THEVALAKKATTU HOUSE, VAVACKAL, NORTH PARUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.P.P.BIJU RESPONDENT: --------------- THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (KWA) KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, VADAKKEKARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. M. DINESH, SC FOR KWA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 4088 OF 2008 J ==================== Dated this the 14th day of March, 2008 J U D G M E N T The prayer sought for in this writ petition is to direct the respondent to provide water connection to the residential building referred to in Ext.P1 forthwith. Petitioner submits that though an application was made for connection to the building mentioned in Ext.P1, connection was given erroneously to another premises. 2. Learned Standing Counsel on instructions submit that the transferor of the petitioner had initially applied for a water connection to the premises now occupied by the petitioner and that after transferring the premises to the petitioner, water connection was given to the premises indicated by the transferor which is now found to be different from what was mentioned in the application. Now that the petitioner has stated his claim for getting water connection to the premises mentioned in Ext.P1, Water Authority has issued notice to the transferor to whom the water connection is already given. It is stated that a reply to the notice is yet to be received and once reply is received, appropriate action in the matter will be taken. WPC 4088/08 :2 : 3. From the submissions made by the standing counsel for the respondents, it is evident that on being alerted by the petitioner, the Water Authority has initiated appropriate action in the matter. Therefore with a direction that the action initiated shall be completed and remedial action will be taken as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, this writ petition is disposed of. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp