S B IServ1ce Matter! IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISG ' (CHHATTISGARH) ARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. Fg§lll2009 / Nazariyus Tirkey, daughter of Gabriel Tirkey, aged about 43 years, working as Assistant Teacher Janpad Primary School Mudapar Patthalgaon Tahs1l Patthalgaon D1str1ct Jashpur, Chhattlsgarh. PETITIONER: VETSUS Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Educatlon Department D K S Bhawan Ralpur C G . District Education Officer, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. .Block Education Officer, Block Block Patthalgaon, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. . Joint Director, 'Accounts, Treasury and i Pension, Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. X WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2260F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .REV ' PETITIONER HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.7434 OF 2009 Nazariyus Tirkey Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. RESPONDENTS Present :— Shri C J K Rao counsel for the petitioner Shri P K Bhadun Panel Lawyeiforthe State > RDER ORAL (Passed on this 17 day of December 2009) 1) With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finaily. 2) By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to pay two advance increments from the date of passing of B.T.L examination, on her own expenses, during her service period. 3) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present case is no longer res integra as the same has been consrdered and decided by this Court in Yashwant Kumer Bharadwaj v Municipal Corporation Duly and another and Gopesh Kumar Verma v The state Govt. of Chhaitisgem and another? . Learned counsel further submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision as aforestated Thus the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to demde" her case in the light of aforestated decision subject to verifcation of the fact asto whether the petitioner has acquired B.T.i.> certificate on her own expenses during the course of her service. 4) Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes agrepresentation, the same wili be considered and decided in accordance with law and in the iight of the decision of this Court in Yeshwant Kumar Bharadwaj and Gopesh Kumar Verma (supra) Within a period of four weeks from thedate of receipt of the representation 5) in View of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 6) Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of/y/ / Gowri mg[ x - ae“p