.. 1 .. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 492 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 601 OF 2009 Shri Shivaji Manikarao Yadav .... Appellant V/s. Hri Jinendra Bhau Dattawade .... Respondent Mr. R.S. Alange advocate for the appellant. Mr. Vijay Killedar advocate for the respondent. CORAM : R.V. MORE, J. DATED : 4TH MAY 2009. P.C. Heard Mr. Alange and Mr. Killedar, counsel for the appellant and respondents respectively submits that during the pendency of the suit the parties shall maintain status quo regarding the possession of suit property as on the date of suit. 2. In view of this statement Mr. Killedar learned counsel for the respondent has no objection if the impugned order is quashed and set aside. In view of the concession for setting aside the impugned order, reasons need not be required to be given. In the above circumstnaces. I dispose of the Appeal From Order by passing the following order : “That the impugned order dated 27th January 2001 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jaysinghpur below exhibit 5 in Special Civil Suit No. 47 of 2008 is quashed and set aside. 3. The statement of the learned counsel for the respective parties that during the pendency of the suit, the parties will maintain the status quo regarding suit property as on the date of the suit is accepted. SKT/- .. 2 .. 4. In the interest of justice, the learned Judge shall dispose of Special Civil Suit No. 47 of 2008 as expeditiously as possible. (R.V. MORE, J.) SKT/-