IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6249 of 2009 SUNIL KUMAR, SON OF BIJENDRA RAI, R/V DEVKULI, P.S. MAKHDUMPUR IN THE DISTRICT OF JEHANABAD----PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR----OPP. PARTY. ----------- 02. 21.07.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the complainant. Petitioner husband is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Sections 498A, 379, 323 of the Penal Code. It is submitted on his behalf that the entire story of marriage of the daughter of the complainant with petitioner is absolutely incorrect and false as petitioner was never married to the daughter of the complainant Ramadhar Singh. Such submission is being refuted by the counsel for the complainant, who states that petitioner had one sided love affair with the daughter of the complainant and he was apprehended committing overt acts, whereafter the matter was reported to the police but on account of intervention of the well-wishers, First Information Report was not lodged and the petitioner married the daughter of the complainant and having married the daughter of the complainant, the two lived together as husband and wife for about ten months whereafter the petitioner drove out the daughter of the complainant asking her to fetch dowry of Rs. one lakh. In view of the allegations as set out in the complaint, I am not inclined to entertain this application, which is dismissed with direction to the petitioner to surrender in the court of Sub-Divisional - 2 - Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Complaint Case No. 243 of 2008 within four weeks from today and apply for regular bail which should be considered in accordance with law. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)