IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1399 of 2008 ARVIND KUMAR PANDEY Versus SMT.KAULESHWARI DEVI@KAULESHWARI GWALIN & ORS. ----------- 2 28/8/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the application seeking impleadment filed by the petitioner in the capacity of Principal of an affiliated college defending the property of the college in question, was rightly rejected by the court below. Statutes pertaining to an affiliated college by themselves define as to what power the principal has or in which capacity he can represent the college. There is no difficulty in accepting this part of the submission that the land of the college has to be defended by the Governing body, but the principal has no separate power or authority to represent the Governing Body for defending the property of the college. This being so as per the University law, the application filed by the Principal in his individual capacity before the Court below was wholly misconceived and was rightly rejected by the impugned order. Such order should not have been assailed by the petitioner by filing this misconceived and frivolous Civil Revision application. This Court would therefore hold that this civil revision application is wholly frivolous and accordingly the same is dismissed with cost of Rs. 2,500/-. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar