THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA Civil Revision Petition Nos.6231 and 6232 of 2009 Date: 29-01-2010 C.R.P.No.6231 of 2009: Between Paladugu Pitchayya … Petitioner/ Appellant/Defendant and Paladugu Vasundhara … Respondent/ Respondent/Plaintiff C.R.P.No.6232 of 2009: Between Paladugu Pitchayya … Petitioner/ Appellant/Defendant and Paladugu Vasundhara … Respondent/ Respondent/Plaintiff THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA Civil Revision Petition Nos.6231 and 6232 of 2009 Oral Common Order: Heard Sri G.Udaya Bhaskar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. Since both the revisions arise out of one suit and the parties being common, they are being disposed of by this common order. 3. C.R.P.No.6231 of 2009 is directed against the order and decree, dated 17-9-2009, in C.M.A.No.11 of 2008, passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Avanigadda, Krishna district, wherein and whereby the order and decree, dated 09-7-2008, in I.A.No.488 of 2007 in O.S.No.127 of 2007, passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Avanigadda, were confirmed creating charge to the petitioner-plaintiff over the petition schedule property till the disposal of the main suit. 4. C.R.P.No.6232 of 2009 is directed against the order and decree, dated 17-9-2009, in C.M.A.No.9 of 2008, passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Avanigadda, wherein and whereby the order and decree, dated 09-7-2008, in I.A.No.489 of 2007 in O.S.No.127 of 2007, passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Avanigadda, were confirmed directing the respondent-defendant to pay a sum of Rs.1,000/- towards interim monthly maintenance to the petitioner-plaintiff from the date of filing of the suit till the disposal of the main suit on or before 10th of every succeeding month. 5. The petitioner herein is the appellant-defendant (husband) and the respondent is the respondent-plaintiff (wife) in the suit before the trial Court. 6. Perused the impugned orders passed by the lower appellate Court as well as the trial Court. I find absolutely there is justification in passing the impugned orders in the facts and circumstances before both the Courts below. I also find no merit in both the revisions. 7. In the result, both the civil revision petitions are dismissed, at the stage of admission, confirming the impugned orders. ___________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA 29th January, 2010. Ak