BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Tenth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14556 of 2011 1 MURUGAN S/O. POTTUALAGAN 2 MURUGAN S/O. KALAKI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 2 AND 3 Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE C-5, SILAIMAN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DT CR NO. 250/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.MANICKARAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR. K.S. DURAIPANDIAN,ADDITIONAL PUBLIC POROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest, at the hands of the respondent police, the petitioners, who are accused Nos. 2 and 3 in crime No. 250 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 324, 307 and 109 of IPC., r/w. Sections 3 of TNPPDL Act and the same was altered into sections 341, 324 and 307 of IPC., r/w. Section 3 of TNPPDL Act, have come forward with this Petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of the prosecution, due to election motive, when the de facto complainant along with two other was proceeding in a car, the same was waylaid by the petitioners, in which the de facto complainant and two others were attacked by the petitioners and two other accused. Two other accused persons were already released on bail on arrest. It is alleged that the first petitioner attacked the de facto complainant with aruval on his index finger. The second petitioner attacked the de facto complainant with stick. The injuries caused by the petitioners are simple in nature. All injured persona were discharged from the hospital on 27.10.2011 itself. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would deny the above allegations. He would submit that due to political motive, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and all the injured have been discharged from the hospital. 4. Having regard to the nature of the allegations made against the petitioners and considering the fact that injuries caused by the petitioners are simple in nature and also considering the fact that the injured have been discharged from the hospital and also considering the fact that two other accused were already granted bail and also considering the other circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No. II, Madurai, on each executing a bond for a sum of RS. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police every day at 10.30 am, until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.p.c., scrupulously. sd/- 10/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE C-5, SILAIMAN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DT 2 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 3 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.II, MADURAI 4 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI 1. CC to M/S. R.MANICKARAJ Advocate SR.No.39030: DM::2011:NOVEMBER:12:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14556 of 2011 Date :10/11/2011 2P:6C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/