IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1589 of 2011 JITENDRA KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 420, 467 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioner to have received Rs. twenty lacs for transferring a flat, but when the complainant went there he found that another person has already purchased the said flat. It appears from the impugned order that complainant lodged two complaint cases against the petitioner bearing Complaint Case no. 421 (C) of 2010 and other bearing Complaint Case No. 1032 (C) of 2010. It appears that in the first complaint the complainant has admitted that no money was return and the entire money was paid in cash whereas in second complaint the complainant has admitted the payment by cheque to the tune of Rs. five lacs. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that instant complaint was filed as a counter - 2 - blast to complainant case no. 570(C) of 2010 lodged by petitioner regarding taking his signature on a plain paper after intoxicating him for the purpose of preparing forged papers. Considering the aforesaid facts and both sides have lodged complainant against each other, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Patna, in connection with in Complaint Case No. 421(C) of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Bhardwaj ( Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)