IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 9TH AUGUST 2011 / 18TH SRAVANA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 1078 of 2010(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.17058/2010 Dated 14/06/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ------------------------- K.T.THOMAS, AGED 64 YEARS, S/O.THOMAS, KONDODICKAL HOUSE, UMBIDI.P.O., THOTTAKAD, CHANGANACHERRY. BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENTS: MEMBERS OF RESPONDENT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH, IAS, AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT COLLECTOR & CHAIRMAN, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI. 2. GEORGE VARGHESE, IPS, AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE & MEMBER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI. 3. P.K.STEPHAN, AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DEPUTY TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, CZ-II & MEMBER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.M.MANOJ FOR R3 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: COC NO.1078 OF 2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE-A TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE MVI IDUKKI ANNEXURE B TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF RTA, IDUKKI DTD.5.3.2010. ANNEXURE C CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.6.2010 IN WPC NO.17058 OF 2010. ANNEXURE D TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF RTA, IDUKKI DATED 14.7.2010. TRUE COPY P.S.TO JUDGE CSS/ K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ------------------------------------------- Contempt Case No.1078 of 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th August, 2011 JUDGMENT It is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that the directions contained in the judgment dated 14.6.2010 of this Court has already been complied with and Order No.B-31687/2009/ID dated 19.5.2011 has already been issued by the Regional Transport Authority, Idukki. A copy of the order is already stated to have been communicated to the petitioner. In the above circumstances, no further action is called for in this Contempt Case. The same is accordingly closed. SD/- K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE TRUE COPY P.S.TO JUDGE css/