1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.522 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr. Sandip Jinsiwale for the appellant. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 20/09/2010 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2 This appeal is directed against concurrent findings recorded by the courts below dismissing the suit filed by the appellant for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from transferring the suit property to any third party. The only contention urged by learned counsel for the appellant is that under section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act, he has preferential right to purchase the suit land, he being the brother of defendant no.1. Admittedly, the Srk 2 property in dispute is ancestral property and there was a partition and after partition plaintiff and defendant both were put in possession of their respective shares. In view thereof, the courts below have rightly rejected the very same contention holding that the provisions contained in section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act are not attracted. For the reasons recorded in paragraph 9 of the judgment rendered by the appellant court, the appeal is dismissed. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)