^y ^ i^\ 6 IN THE mGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No.'^:lA<UJ.......2002 PETITIONER Ramji Ram Manjhi S/o Ramvilash Manjhi, Aged about 53 years, R/o Satipara, Ambikapur Distt. Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS :^l: The State of Chhattisgarh. / ,..<j5 Through : The Secretary, i<i .<•..<« >.^^! ?'';,^3''\., ^^:'.,..•••"' (rf«"''kd<~y-'7 ,•' \^>.--' >- General Administration ^M^- :';'^U?-& ST,SC,OBC Dept. D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt 0->' ^' '\-^ ^ \''-^ ^M^S^^ ^^y^y Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Commissioner, SC/ST/OBC, Deptt. Raipur. 3. Collector, Trible Development Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja 4. Block Educational Officer (DDO) Ambikapur Distt. Sarguja \^' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA iB:1l.'r XI-HC-23 311^1 ^iT F;-)i+ 3H^[ 5ti*4i<^ *i^? 3^ •^l^ld'f, d^y'l<i, ('Kiioy s-e- t(i<ini afflrai 1ra«F O':'2_^^/o-l_ 100 31R^[ •^RIIW^lfta 17.3.2004 Ma^ioj Sdhool tbe Petitioner bv Shri Respondents No. 1 tb| The petitioner has pr^i of the Constitution of Ind 7.9.2002 whereby the petitit Pruicipal ta Govt. High Boda, Distnct Jashpur. The petitioner's petiti<( he was traitsferred froin Baster to the Govt. High pursuaat to that order he workuiR with all siucerif\r to ttie weaJser section of traasferrcd to Jashpur be< Tankeshwar Siugh, who wa( the vear 1992 aad \vas. Of&cer, Ambikapur, contrarj the said Tankeshwar Siagh present petitioner bein| Incharge of Block Educatioi|i which the petition.er inade not been decided so far, No retum has been SU jiinj.or andl °hWtffdl-i WTOt" 4 'fs'St 'rfSRSTt ^; s<Sw sn^r ' LOJ Paraajpe, Advocate. 4 by Shri A. K. Tiwari, Paael law}rer. ferred this petition underArticle 226/227 lia beiag aggrieved bv fhe order dated >ner has been traasferred froia fhe post of tiool, Katkalo fo flie Govt. High Seliool, a^d the >a is fhat on the reqiiest of fhe petitioner Govt. High School, Bamur, District- School, Kafkalo, District- Sarguja aad assuined the charge. The petitioner was: devotion aitd was imparting education society. Ttereafter the petitioner was |ause he agitated fhe proinotion of one appointed as Lower Division Teacher in Ippointed as lucharge Block Educatiori ^ to the Govt. PoUcy. It is submitted fhat| ^vas working under fhe supervisioa. of tia.e to the petitioner but was pronioted as OfEicer, which is a higher post; Agaiosj; representation Aiuiexure P/3, which h^ the petitioner has been traQsferred. ||i|^ bd bv tlie State. ^ :: ^ XI-HC-22 311^1^1 (<-fi* 3n^r shW^ ^Q^- -.<•• -F ?-. "3^ -!iwi<n<<, «A<:('I<»,(^K'ii'yy sii^i'FRfraT^id^ ,_ -^ whidh Leamed counsel foi allowed to inake fi.u-ther directed to decide that of fhe petitioner, to objectioa; Haviag heard leame^l to the facts aad eu-cuiiistata raake a detailed period of 10 days froia decide fhe representatio^l considemig ail the repi^sentation, by passing With the above ConsequenUy I. A.| disposed 'of. Parties are entifled the petitioner siibnuts fh.at he inay be r^preseiitation aad fhe respondents m.ay be reijiresentation considerhig all fhe grievances leamed coiuisel for the State has no stallces represerjtati. to|lay lOt. c6i^M4i;T TIP^ ^ '^3^ ^^l;t ^T3lf:TO3lA?T eounsel for fhe parties and having regard of fhe case ftie pefitioner is aUowed to tatioii to fhe Respoudent No. 1 wifhia a and ia tura the Respondent No.l wffl within a further period of 30 days nts raised by the petitioner ia fhe a i^asoned order in accordance with law. this petition is disposed of fiiially. No. 7869/2002 and 108/2004 standj pojnt obselvations f<|>r certified copy of fhis order. Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge "•t \.-^ j' i.:l ^ '.^J B na r