IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DECEMBER 2007 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 WP(C).No. 37774 of 2007(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ DR.ANITHA M.A., TUTOR, DEPT. OF ORGANON, DR.PADIYAR MEMORIAL HOMOEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE, CHOTTANIKKARA, ERNAKULAM, RESIDING AT KURUMDODATH HOUSE, EROOR SOUTH, TRIPUNITHURA. BY ADV. SRI.P.SREEKUMAR SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HOMOEOPATHIC MEDICINE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE PRINCIPAL AND CONTROLLING OFFICER, GOVERNMENT HOMOEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE PRINCIPAL, DR.PADIYAR MEMORIAL HOMOEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE, CHOTTANIKKARA, ERNAKULAM. BY SMT.N.SUDHA DEVI, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.37774 OF 2007 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of December, 2007 JUDGMENT The petitioner is a tutor in the Padiyar Memorial Homoeopathic Medical College, Chottanikkara. She is aggrieved by the discrimination shown by the 4th respondent between clinical and non-clinical staff in the matter of granting service benefits. Detailing these grievances, the petitioner has filed Ext.P11 representation before the 1st respondent. The petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the same. 2. I have heard the learned Government pleader also. In the nature of the order I propose to pass I do not think it necessary to issue notice to the 4th respondent for the present. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there would be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P11 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, W.P.(c)No.37774/07 2 after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as the 4th respondent. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd