IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10347 of 2010 1. MD. REYAJ AHMAD S/O ABDUL KUDUSH R/O VILL.- MAULANAGAR, BLOCK- BELSAND, P.S.- BELSAND, DISTT.- SITAMARHI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA 3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 4. THE MEMBER, DISTRICT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SITAMARHI 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SITAMARHI 6. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SITAMARHI 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BLOCK-BELSAND, SITAMARHI 8. THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, BLOCK- BELSAND, SITAMARHI 9. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ PACHNAUR, BLOCK- BELSAND, DISTT.- SITAMARHI 10. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ PACHNAUR BLOCK- BELSAND, DISTT.- SITAMARHI 11. MEHRU NISA W/O MD. KHALIL VILL.- PACHNAUR, P.S.- BELSAND, DISTT.- SITAMARHI 12. MD. JAHANGIR S/O MD. HUSSAIN VILL.- MAHATHI CHANDAULI, WARD NO.-4, P.O.- CHANDAULI, BELSAND, DISTT.- SITAMARHI ----------- 02. 7.3.2011 Counsel for the petitioner has tried to nit-pick and draw attention of the Court to a communication contained in Annexure-3 written by the Panchayat Secretary to the Block Education Extension Officer, Belsand that there was some mistake in the application of roster clearance while making appointment. On perusal of the same and reading of the order passed by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority I do not find any incongruity in the finding reached because so far as the petitioner is concerned he was a claimant for appointment under the general unreserved category and there is nobody with 2 lesser marks than the petitioner who has been appointed in the same category. His attack on Md. Jahangir and his engagement has no relevance because such appointment has been made under the EBC category to which he belongs. In view of the finding given by the appellate authority no case of discrimination or arbitrariness exists which will make out a case for any direction upon the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner. There is no infirmity in the order. The writ application has no merit. It is dismissed accordingly. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)