IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.578 of 2009 SHOBHA DEVI, WIFE OF SRI VIJAY KUMAR @ MUNNA THAKUR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NETHUA, P.O. AWARI, P.S. MARHAURA, DISTRICT- SARAN AT CHAPRA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, SPECIAL TASK FORCE, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPECIAL TASK FORCE, BIOHAR, PATNA. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SARAN AT CHAPRA, DISTRICT- SARAN AT CHAPRA. 6. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SARAN, DISTRICT- SARAN AT CHAPRA. 7. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MARHAURA, DISTRICT- SARAN AT CHAPRA. 8. THE STATE HEAD OFFICER, MARHAURA POLICE STATION, DISTRICT- SARAN AT CHAPRA. ----------- 4 12.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Additional Advocate General No. 10 on behalf of the State. The prayer of the petitioner is to issue appropriate direction to save her family including her husband from the police atrocities which the family is being compelled to face for the last so many years and the family of the petitioner are being dragged in false cases registered by the police and thereby, interfering in their peaceful life. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the police has registered a false case vide Marhaura P.S. Case No. 148 of 2004 as also Marhaura P.S. Case No. 120 of 2005 and other cases. Learned counsel further submits that on the instructions of the Inspector General of Police, Special Task Forcer, Bihar, Patna (respondent no. 3), although the statement of the person namely Md. Aalim was recorded by the Superintendent of police (respondent no.5), however those statements were not made part of the police diary of the said case. The above submissions were advanced in support of the case that the family members of the petitioner are being harassed by the police. The petitioner has also brought to the notice of the action of the police in obtaining the order of warrant of arrest of the accused persons including the husband of the petitioner in the aforesaid Marhaura P.S. Case No.120 of 2005. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on the other hand, submits that the petitioner has filed the present writ application with a vague prayer and no relevant details have been given in the writ application in order to support his contention with regard to the alleged police atrocities as such the writ application is fit to be dismissed. Considering the rival submissions, it appears that the allegation of the police atrocities and also the allegation of dragging the family members of the petitioner in the false cases by the police have without any foundational facts. More so the present writ application has not been filed by the person alleged to have been harassed by the police atrocities or being dragged in a false case. The writ application, for being devoid of any merit, is accordingly dismissed. Amrendra/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)