Civil Revision No.2001 of 2009 [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Civil Revision No.2001 of 2009 Decided on : April 17, 2009 Punjab State Cooperative Bank Ltd. ... Petitioner VERSUS M/s Ishan textiles Mills Limited and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Jaishree Thakur and Mr.Ajay Sood, Advocates for the petitioner. A.N.JINDAL, J.- Heard. Having scrutinised the order dated 18.3.2009 (Annexure P- 1) passed by Civil Judge (Jr.Divn.), Chandigarh as well as the order dated 19.6.2008 (Annexure P-2) passed by Joint Registrar (Farming), Cooperative Societies, Punjab, the Arbitrator appointed to adjudicate the dispute between the parties, it is observed that since the Arbitrator in its order directed the respondent to make the payment of Rs.2,67,43,356.12 paise as on 30.6.2003 as principal; interest @ 19% p.a till the realisation and costs, but he did not clarify about the date from which the interest could be recovered. In the ordinary course, the Arbitrator must have discussed and observed about the date from which the petitioner Bank Civil Revision No.2001 of 2009 [ 2 ] was entitled to recover the interest and this ambiguity must have been rectified by the Arbitrator himself and the Executing Court could not add its own judgment. The Arbitrator appears to have kept his mouth shut over such a major issue for the reasons best known to him. Faced with this situation, counsel for the petitioner has sought to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a review petition before the Arbitrator for clarification of the applicability date of interest. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to move an application for review before the Arbitrator i.e. Joint Registrar (Farming), Cooperative Societies, Punjab, Chandigarh and in such situation, the order passed by the Executing Court dated 18.3.2009 (Annexure P-1) would be of no consequence. It is further made clear that the documents deposited by the respondent with the petitioner Bank would not be released, during the pendency of the review application. April 17, 2009 ( A.N.JINDAL ) `gian' JUDGE