IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40660 of 2009 GANESH RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 11.03.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner in a Police case under Section 364A of the Penal Code is that certain FIR witnesses have made a statement different from that attributed to them in the FIR. To this Court that is hardly relevant when the informant is the grand parent of the three years old minor child alleging that the petitioner and the informant’s neighbour Pravin Kumar alias Pappu were well known to them and often have been playing with the child and on the fateful day they had prompted the child to accompany them whereafter the child has gone missing and remains missing. This application is dismissed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)