IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 5TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 16TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 3097 of 2010(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- INDIA TELECOM INFRA LTD.IIND FLOOR CHAKKARCHERY TOWER, SEA PORT AIRPORT ROAD KAKKANADU,KOCHI REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED PERSON BOBY SEBASTIAN ,CIRCLE HEAD. BY ADV. SRI.P.SATHISAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KSEB ELECTRICAL SECTION, VELLOORKUNNAM. 2. CHIEF ENGINEER, DISTRIBUTION, KSEB, VYDHUTHIPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. KSEB, REP BY ITS ASSISTANT ENGINEER KSEB ELECTRICAL SECTION,VALAYANCHIRANGARA. ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B FOR R1 TO 3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ----------------------------------------------- WP(C) No. 3097 of 2010 -------------------------------------- Dated, this the 5th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is challenging the callous inaction on the part of the respondent in providing the necessary connection and power supply to the Mobile Tele Communication Unit, despite satisfying all the necessary requirements. Because of the delay, irreparable loss and injury have been stated as caused to the petitioner and hence is under challenge. 2. The learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents submits, on instructions, that there was some objection raised from some corners and the matter is being sorted out by the respondents with every earnest effort. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that, by virtue of the stipulations under the relevant provisions of law, the petitioner has to satisfy some more requirement including execution of an indemnity Board as prescribed. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to satisfy the said requirements within no time. 3. In the above facts and circumstances, the first respondent shall inform the petitioner as to the further requirements to be satisfied WP(C) No.3097/2010 2 from the part of the petitioner within one week, upon which it will be for the petitioner to satisfy the same. On satisfying the said requirements, the 1st respondent shall refer the dispute, if any, to the concerned ADM having the jurisdiction over the area within one week thereafter. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE dnc