C):[®’a 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIsGARH AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH Writ petition (S) No.§5¢‘>7"/2oo7 PETITIONER Jagmohan Patel, aged about 42 years, S/o Shri Chhini Lal Patel, Assistant Teacher Govt. Middle Secondary School Kusmura, Block Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G./) VERSUS Raigarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G./) ./ » WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IN DIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER. As mentioned in the Cause title. 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.)/ Commissioner, Tribal Weifare Department, Raipur, District, Raipur (C.G.) , Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Weifare Department, Raigah District Raigarh, (C.G.)/ Biock Education Officer, WWW?L)\5% . ‘ ‘ $ \Lo- 5 ”02L mW (Wm mmm mmm Waqwwm‘m 5.3: HON’BLE JUSTicE MR. PR1 ‘INKER DIWAKER _ 03-08-2009: Shri Anil Mourya, counsel fo the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey. Panel La er for the State. K At the ou$et counsel for t e petitiener submits that m wants to make representation to the authority withdraw this petition with Iiberty o concemed. He also seeks a di ction to the concerned authority for deciding the representation of the titioner at an early date as according to him of the petitioner is squar iy covered with the order passed in wrtt case petition (S) No. 4248/2008. Counsel for the responden State submis‘ that at this stage he can not make any statement before thi Court whether case of the petitioner is covered with the order passed in a orementioned writ petition. However, he submits that if the petitioner ma es a representation to the concerned respondent, the same shail be deci ed strictly in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is ismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. lf the petitioner mak a representation to the concerned ‘ respondent within a period of two onths from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same is expected to e decided within a further period of four months from the date of its receipt. it is made clear that this Co rt has not cemented on the merits of _ the case and the authorities are ee to decide the representation of the witl" law. E petitioner strictly in accordance § Sd/- a; e: ~ i Pritinker Diwaker .. cM/ , Judge