IN TH HIGH COURT OF Ke,RNTAK AT BANGALORE Dated this the 5th iay of June 1998 BEFORE THE HON 3LE MR. 3USTICE CHDRA&HEKARAIiH _2L2!22±22!Z Between: 1. Sri. .Mehaboob Pasha, s/o,Sri .Budde Dadesab, aged about 65 years, Tailor, resident of Mittikeri Street, Koppal, Raichur district. 2. Sri.Iriam Hussaia, S/o.Sri ,Budde Dadesab, aged about 63 years, Agriculturist, resident of Devaraj Urs Colony, Koppal, Riachur District. 3. Sri.Rehman Basha, S/o.Sri .budde Dadesab, aged about 57 years, Thilor, resident of Mittikeri Streets Koppal, Raichur District, 4. Sri.Jaffer Hussain, S/o,Sri ,Budde dadesab, aged about 53 years, residing at Mjttikeri Street, Koppal, Raichur District, 5. Sri,Gulam Hussajn, S/o,Sri .Budde Dadesab, aged about 43 years, resident of Mittikeri Street, Koppal, Raichur District, , , .2 —2— 6. Sri.Khaja Hussain, S/o.ri ,Budde DadesaA, aged about 40 years, Govt. Servant, resident of Hatti, Mittikeri Street, Koppal, Raichur District. 7. Sri.Ibrahim Khaleel, S/o.Sri ,Budde Dadesab, aged about 37 years, Mechanic, resident of Jawahar Road, Koppal, Rajchur listrict. ..,PETITIONERS Petitioners 2 to 7 are represented b’ their General Power of Attorney Holder the First Petitioner. (By Sri.K.Govindaraju, Adv,) And: 1. The 1 irector, Department of Municipal Administration, Visveswaraiah Towers, Bangalore — 560 001. 2, 1 he Deputy Canmissioner, Rajchur District, kaichur. 3. The Town Municipality, Koppal, Raichur district, rep. by its Chief Officer, ...RESPONDENTS (By Sri.K.Nagaraja, HCGP) 4 4 4 This rit Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to quash vide nnexure ‘G’ and ‘H’ dated 26.3.97 and 12.3.93 respectively. . . .3 —3— This Writ Petition caning on for Preliminary iearing in ‘B Group this days the Court made the following: - ORDER The petitioners have challenged the order of the Deputy Commissioner passed under Section 306(1) of the Karnataka Municipalities Act and the endorse ment in this Writ Petition. 2. he Deputy Commissioner passed an order under Section 306(1) of the Act.Ais required to sbMr%hereew. to the State Government to pass the final order under Sub-Section(2) of Section 306 of the act, In this Writ Petitions it is not known whether the Government has passed the order after notice to the Municipal Council. If at all if the petitioners are aggrieved by the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner, it is open for the petitioners to move the Divisional Commissioner to pass a final order as required under section 306(2) of the Act, In the said view of the matter 9 . .4 —4— e I do not propose to interfere in this Irit Petition, Accordingly 0 this brit Petition is rejected, JUDGE sps/