1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 9448 of 2011-E alongwith CWP Nos. 9455 of 2011-F & 9462 of 2011-G Decided on: 4.11.2011 1. CWP No. 9448 of 2011-E Mehar Chand & others vs. State of H.P. & others 2. CWP No. 9455 of 2011-F Savitri Kapoor & another vs. State of H.P. & others 3. CWP No. 9462 of 2011-G Vrinda Kumari vs. State of H.P. & others Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioners : M/s Vikas Rajput & Sanjeev Kumar Advocate in CWP Nos. 9448/11-E & 9455/2011-F. Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate in CWP No. 9462/2011. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. 2 Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) This issue pertaining to vacation salary to contract teachers is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court rendered in Baldev Singh and others versus State of H.P. and others, CWP No. 415 of 2000, decided on 1st September, 2008 and the judgment has become final. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondents to release eligible vacation salary, during the entire service period, to the petitioners in case the same has not been granted so far, within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition(s) and a copy of the judgment, referred to above, by the petitioner concerned. If the amounts are not disbursed as above, the petitioners will be entitled to interest @ 10% and the officers responsible for the delay shall be personally liable for the same. 2. The pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. November 4, 2011 (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (hl) Judge.