gst 1 cra1124.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 1124 OF 2010. Karande Ramchandra Dattu.... .... .... ..Applicant. V/s Ichalkaranji Mun. Council ... .... .... ..Respondent. Mr.S.S.Patwardhan, Adv. For the applicant. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. 12th Jan., 2011. PC: By the present revision application the applicant challenges the order dated 28.9.2010 vide which the application filed by the respondent for restoration of suit which was dismissed came to be allowed. 2. Learned counsel on behalf of the applicant submits that the trial Court grossly erred in allowing the application for restoration wherein sufficient cause was not made out. 3. The trial Court has given cogent reasons while allowing the application. In any case, the trial Court has exercised the discretion which permits the parties to get decided their dispute on merits instead of foreclosing the doors of justice on technical grounds. In that view of the matter no case is made out for interference. Hence civil revision application stands rejected.