IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3283 of 2002. Smt. Nathu Kanwar & Another VERSUS Sikar Sahkari Bhumi Vikas Bank Limited, Sikar & Another Date Of Order ::: 18/03/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain J. Mr. Gajanand Bhanav, advocate, for Mr. Anoop Dhand, Counsel for the Petitioners Mr. Ram Kumar Sharma, Counsel for the respondents BY THE COURT : Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file an application/representation before the respondent-Bank for One Time Settlement of their dues. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objections in granting permission to the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition and to file representation by them with the respondent-Bank for One Time Settlement of the dues. He has also assured that the case of the petitioners to waive penal interest and other penalties will be considered sympathetically. After considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file an application/representation before the respondent-Bank for the One Time Settlement of their dues. It will be open for the petitioners to file fresh writ petition, if they are not satisfied with the decision of the Bank on their representation. It is directed that the due amount will not be recovered from the petitioner by the respondent-Bank by adopting any coercive method for a period of two-months from today. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. ashok/