1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8864 OF 2009 ... Arjuna Daji Kene ...Petitioner v/s. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ...Respondents ... Mr.Rahul Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, AGP for State. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, & A.R.JOSHI, JJ DATED: 6 th January, 2010 P.C.: 1. Rule. Returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. 2. It appears that the Petitioner is a 2 project affected person. His name is at serial No.138 of the list of project affected persons. It appears from the record that when names were recommended by the Rehabilitation Officer, names of persons who were listed below the Petitioner were recommended, but the name of the Petitioner was not forwarded. The Petitioner, therefore, addressed a letter to the S.D.O. Kolhapur on 31-7-2009 and he also made a representation dated 3-8-2009 to the Collector, Kolhapur. He further addressed representation dated 7-8-2009 again to the Collector, Kolhapur making a grievance about non-recommendation of his name for consideration for any post for which the Petitioner may be eligible. But neither his name is being recommended nor his representation is being attended to. 3. We have heard the learned Counsel for 3 the Collector. In our opinion, therefore, following order would meet the ends of justice. O R D E R (i)The Petitioner to appear before the Collector, Kolhapur on 18-1-2010 along with a copy of this order and copies of his representations dated 31-7-2009 and 3-8-2009 and 7-8-2009. The Collector, Kolhapur, thereafter, shall hold an inquiry in accordance with law and pass a reasoned orders on the representations of the Petitioner within a period of four weeks from 18-1-2010. (ii) It is made clear that if any recruitment for any post is going on under the Collector and if the Petitioner is found eligible for that post, the name 4 of the Petitioner should be considered. (iii) Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (A.R.JOSHI, J.)