IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH JULY 2009 / 17TH ASHADHA 1931 RP.No. 587 of 2009(C) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.11370/2006 Dated 04/06/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- P.G.NARAYANAN NAIR, S/O.GOVINDA PILLAI, AGED 60 YEARS, PERUMPILLIL HOUSE, MARAMPILLY P.O. PALLIPRAM KARA, ALUVA - 7. BY ADV. SRI.K.SUNILKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. MANJAPPETTY MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MANJAPPETTY, MARAMPILLY. 2. THE PRESIDENT, MANJAPPETTY MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, MANJAPPETTY, MARAMPILLY. 3. THE DIRECTOR, DIARY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PATTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIARY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, KAKKANAD. 5. DIARY EXTENSION OFFICER,VAZHAKKULAM BLOCK, CHENUNGUMVELY, ALUVA. 6. SANJU K.SALEEM,S/O.SALEEM, KALAPPURACKAL (HOUSE) KUTTIKATTUKARA, KADUNGALOOR VILLAGE. 7. OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, PERUMBAVOOR BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSHKUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- R.P.NO.587/09 in W.P.(C).No.11370/06 ------------------------ Dated this the 8th day of July, 2009. O R D E R The writ petitioner has filed this review petition, mainly contending that the 6th respondent, purchaser of the property is not a bona fide purchaser. In the judgment dated 4th June, 2009, although this court upheld the contention that the sale is vitiated for non-compliance with Rule 54. Still liberty was given to the 6th respondent or the Society to move the Registrar for appropriate orders. Now that new allegations have been raised against the bona fides of the ale in favour of the 6th respondent. It is directed that if and when the Registrar is moved pursuant to the direction in the judgment, the Registrar shall issue notice to the Review Petitioner also before a final decision is taken. RP.No.587/09 2 The review petitioner shall produce a copy of the order before the Registrar of the Co-operative Societies, who shall comply with the above direction. Review petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ RP.No.587/09 3