« •^^ '^t, ^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH. AT - BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE (CIVILt N0. ->Yf</~ OF 2009 ^^^ii |B ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER. DATED 18/8/2009 PASSED IN WRIT APPEAL N0. 19 OF 2008 PASSED BY THE HQN'BLE DIVISION BENCH PETITIONER POHARI SHARAN PANDEY, S/0 SHRI RAJOALLABH PANDEY, ^ l0/- A.^/VAGED ABOUT -^ "YEARS, EX - CONSTABLE, R/0 BALDEO BAGH ROAD, NEAR RAILWAY BRIDGE, RAJNANDGOAN, DISTRICT - RAJNANDGOAN (C. G.) VERS U S RESPONDENTS : 1. SHRI ROHIT KUMAR YADAV THE COLLECTOR, DISTRICT - RAJNANDGOAN (C. G.) SHRI PRAVEER KUMAR DAS THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT - RAJNANDGOAN (C. G.) 3. SHRI B. N. MEENA THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT - KABEERDHAM (C. G.) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER SECTIQN - 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF THE COURTS ACT READ WITH ARTICLE - 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA n pF I-HC-22 3'TT^T^T f<rlich 3^?T 5hHic^ 'Hf^a Deepii -^^ ^WM^ ^W^. ^W^< ^TWTT^HIcb itT^T ^^ -. 6^<-/t-)^.3^/^ "tr'200 ^^ST' ^TT^f'^HW^rf^T SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mohan Bhrivastava, J. 27-01-2011 Shri R.K.Kesharwani, counsei flc Shri Aiok Bakshi, counsei fottili Learned counsei forthe petitio^ complied with the order ofthis Court, Learned counsel for the in the return submitted that the disobey the order passed by this taking necessary steps towards Learned counsel for the respondents) have highest regards for the orderf whatever deiay has been unconditionai apology. in the circumstances, with and taking into consideration the| cause shown for deiay in taking app| order of this Court, the deiay appears Accordingly,the ruie is dischar^ The petition is finapy disposed chl^(d4"1 ^i^<nl ^ 'fecst if^t^K ^3^R3n^T |or the petitioner. tite respondents. |ier submitted that the respondents have |iough belatedly. respor|idents, referring to the averments made reslpondent authority had no intention to Coi|rt, though some time was consumed in cobpliance of the order of this Court. 1 further submitted that the respondents and proceedings of this Court ancl caus^d are unintentional and tendered considet-ing that the order has been complied averments made in the return and the app^opriate decision, in compliance of the 1:0 be bonafide and not intentional. ied. — ff. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^ [Tft^ Sf^^