,H§G§‘§ CfEii'R’?’ G3“: GEEIQ. Ta$GARE EiLi§$i9iiQ Wfit Fet§f§mrs g3: NO 3W3? 0i; 2&1? fetmoner VK Richar§ya, son 0f Late Sm RR Richariya. ag abaut 44 years} Sub Engéneen M ! Coratism, mwa resident cf Jau- Kcrba (CG). E wir" a gur Versus Reggona’ewts ’g) Staie 0f Chhat‘tisgzarh, ihrc Deparmwent of 85cm? I VJr ' w H .pvm'A— dmm : - m A Man' ralaya! Raipur. 2) The Municipai Carporaticn, Kama, ‘ihmugh iis Commissioner, Municipai Corporaiion, Korba. (Wrii Peii‘tion under Articie 226 of the Consiiiutmn a? Emma) ‘ $8: Han’bae Mr. Smash K. izgmhotri, .2. g4: Shr‘z Abh%shek3rv‘“a ceunss!farthe w Shr§ YE. Thakur, Depufy Advocate Gen Noqiis‘raie‘ ‘ for the respomjent i Shri Sanjay K Agrawal, mmse? for the respondent No.2. {kRiKL GRQER Wassea on this 23w o‘ay of Jaiy, ”2&8; Wiii ‘i‘he consent of ‘seamed counsei aooearing for the marries, the pet‘riion Is heard rinaily. '2) Learned couneer apoearing for the peritroner submits the“: the oeti‘rioner ooes not want to press tnts oetitiorz on merits, at this stage. However, the getitioner may be permitted ts meKe a representation befere the oenoemed authorities wtthm a peried of trrree days and the same may be dtrecte ‘to be ‘snsic‘erec; am decided, tn accordance with law, within the prescribed time. 3) $nri Y8. Thakur, iearnec: Deputy Advocate Generai epg3em..tg for the State submits that if the reoreeentatio is made, the same sha‘ii be considereo and decided by the o o rity, in accordance with iaw, on its own merits. within a period of two weeks from the date ot' receipt of the representation , t 4'; Shri Thak‘ur further suomits that no coercive steps shati ‘oe taken agains the petitioner, tiiit‘ne disposai ofthe representation. 5‘} in View of the foregoing. the petition stario‘s disposed of. No oro‘ei‘ as to costs. " Smash K. Aguihotxi rw-ia iyii Sdl- Judge Raju r ‘ p n e. " /