IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2008 / 18TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 782 of 2008(R) ------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- MANOJ KUMAR.V., AGED 30, S/O. RAJAGOPALAN, VATTAMANNA HOUSE, MANNARKKAD COLLEGE P.O., KUMARAMPUTHOOR, PALAKKAD DIST., PRESENTLY WORKING AS: ATTENDER MANNARKKAD CO-OP. AGRICULTURAL & RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD., MANNARKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.) SRI.T.RAMPRASAD UNNI SMT.SMITHA GEORGE RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), PALAKKAD. 2. MANNARKKAD CO-OP. AGRICULTURAL & RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD., MANNARKKAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. ANU SIVARAMAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.782 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner, who is an Attender in the 2nd respondent Bank apprehends termination of service at the hands of the 2nd respondent. Complaining about the same, the petitioner has filed Ext.P1 representation before the 1st respondent. The petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Ext.P1. The petitioner further submits that till disposal of Ext.P1, the petitioner may not be terminated from service in so far as there are several vacancies of Attender. 2. I have heard the learned Government pleader also. In the nature of the order I propose to pass I do not think it necessary to issue notice to the 2nd respondent. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there would be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P1 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this W.P.(c) No.782/08 2 judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as the 2nd respondent. Till orders are passed on Ext.P1, the service of the petitioner shall not be terminated by the 2nd respondent. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd W.P.(c) No.782/08 3