K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATRE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JRISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1493 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.446 OF 2005 The CIT-TDS ..Appellant Versus Industrial Credit & Investment ..Respondents Corporation of India Ltd., ---- Mr.A.D.Kango and Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.S.J.Mehta for the respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 18.03.2008. PC 1. There is a delay of 692 days. Cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. 2. Even otherwise, we find that the question farmed is answered by this Court in Nicholas Piramal case. 3. Motion alongwith Appeal accordingly dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)