fl"S ^^ 1^0. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BBLASPUR W.P. (s) No. .^1"}.........J28C^- Fool Chand Kamleshwar, aged about ,..38 years, son of Shri Latkfaor Kamlesfawar, Assistant Teacher Goverttment Primaiy School, Riyatola, District Rajnandgoan (C.G.) PETinONER 'Q^1*^ 4^n% V.?'''\t^''\'P/ <^'^~ .>'' \'*- -^- ^'"^' '^-"' ^° VERSUS RESPONDEPTTS: t. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretaiy Departmeiit of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^Z. District Education Officer, Chhuria, .,-"{?v DistrictRainaadgaonTC.G.1 '<<^. •\h^/> .<;^^tg ^ . i-A^ 3- Block Education Officer Block - <:^y/^ ^ <c?s> -^ Chhuria District - Rajnandgaon ^-°" ^ WMT PETITION U/A 226/23ETOF TffE CQNSTITUTION y. OF FQR ISSITANCE OF WRITS IN TGEE NATUSE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOROTHER SUCTABLE WMTSAND DIRECTIONS The above named petitioaef most humbly and respectfully begs to submitas under:- HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BIb^SPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. ASNIHOTftI. J. WRTT PETmON tS.) NO 464 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus Hemroi Kumbhkar State of Chhatl-isgarh and o'thers WRTT PFTmON tS.) N0. 46B OF Z007 Petitioner Resoondents versus Siddharth Choure State of Chhuttisgarh and o'thers WRTT PETmON fS.l N0. 466 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus Panch Romn 5ahu State of Chhattisgarh and olhers WRTT PETmON IS.) N0. 467 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents wrsys Monhamn Lal Pithcura State of Chhatl'isgarh and o'thers WRTT PETTTION tS.) N0. 468 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus Yaggoiya Datta Baghel Stute of Chhattisgarh and o-thers WMT TION (S 1 N0. 469 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus Shih Khoperckiy State of Chhattisgarh and o-thers WRTT PETTTION (S.) N0. 470 W 2007 Petitioner versus Resoondents Radhey Kishun Portel Sttite of Chhattisgarh ond o1+iers WRTT PETmON (5.) N0. 471 OF 2007 Petjtioner versus Resoondents AtonganLal State of Chhattisgarh and o-Hiers WRTT PETTTION (5.) N0. 472 OF 2007 Petitioner : bhal Smgh Sonwani versus Respondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh cnd o'thers WRTT PFTinON tS.) N0. 473 OF 2007 - Petitioner : Onkar Lal Sonboir versus Resoondents : Stcrte of Chhatt-isgarh and o'thers WRTT PFTTnON (5.1 N0. 474 OF Z007 Petitioner ; Shiv Kumar Sharma versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgorh and others WRTT PETmON 15.) N0. 475 OF 2007 Petitioner Resnondents yersus Rajendra Kumar Sa9ar State of Chhattisgarh ond o-thers WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 476 OF 2007 ic? !/-'•- Petttioner Respondents versus AAakhonhl Thakur State of ChhattiS9arh ond o-thers WRTr PFTTTION (S.VNO. 477 OF 2007 Petitioner yersys Resoondents Fool Chand Kamleshwm' State of Chhatt-isgarh ond others WRTT PFTmON (5.1 N0. 478 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Resoondents Rajendra Kumar Dewangon Stnte of Chhattisgarh nnd others And WRTT PETmON (S.l N0. 479 OF 200Z Petitioner : Joymt Kumar Shendey versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond others Present : Mr. R.K. Jaisuul, Advocate for the petitktners. Mr. Sushit Oubey, 6overnment Advocote for the St'ate/reapondents. OR&ER CPassed on 24* Dey of January, 2007) Leamed counsel oppearing for the petrtioners as well ns leomed Sovemment Advocarte oppearmg for the State/respondents jointly submit that -the fccts and question of law involved in the present batch of writ petitions ore squarely covered by the decision of this Courl' in the case of Yoslwwnt KIMW Olwwlwc^ vs. Mufrie^al Cofywwtlon. Owy wid aiwrtw^. 1. 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (jSopcssh Kumw Vwwavs. Th»State 6o»t. of Chhattlymii <md fWWtfM^ and o-ther connected mort-ters, decided by -this -^ 3 bj Court on 15-12-2006, pursuont to -the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretory, Board of Secondary Education. Bhopal ond the prospec+us of Diploma in Educatton Examination. it was ctarified that •1+ie nomenckiture of the Bnsic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed ond renamed os biploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed, Accordingly, Ihe D.Ed. Certificate hotders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (fiefiessh IQimar Venmvs. Tfw: State Sovt. of Chhatl'isgarh widcvwfhei) (Supra). 3. For •the aforementioned reasons. •the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yashwtyrt' Kuniar fifeinadlwy' (5upro), sub^ct to verification of the fact as to whe'ther the petitioners have acquired B.T.I./&.Ed. Cerl'ificates at •their own expenses as per the circukirs dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whe-Hier -they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of this order be placed on the record of •the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006C[I)< JR-C696 Thakur