IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7866 of 2011 Sat Pal Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Naveen S. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The Haryana Staff Selection Commission advertised 19 posts of Machinist Mechanic Instructors in the Department of Industrial Training and Vocational Education. Two posts were reserved for SC-A and one post was reserved for SC-B. The essential qualifications prescribed for the posts were (i) Matriculation/ Senior Secondary/10th pass under 10+2 Scheme, (ii) National Trade Certificate and Craft Instructors Training Course in concerned Trade coupled with five years Practical/Teaching experience, including the period mentioned at clause (ii) above from a reputed Industrial concern or recognised Institute. Knowledge of Hindi up to Matric was one of the essential qualification. The petitioner applied for the post and was called for interview. The result of the selection was declared on 25.12.2006. The petitioner was placed in the waiting list of the Scheduled Caste category. Subsequently, the petitioner claims to have made enquiries and later learnt that the application forms submitted by the Civil Writ Petition No.7866 of 2011 :2: respondents, who were selected, did not indicate that they had the requisite experience. What was endorsed on the applications of the respondents was that they did not have the experience from a reputed Industrial concern. The respondent-Selection Commission, however, found that the respondents carried the requisite experience from the reputed Industrial concern and were selected. The selection, which was made in the year 2006 is now being challenged on this precise ground after lapse of five years. It was for the respondents to appreciate what sort of experience was needed for the post as they had prescribed the same. No case for interference at this belated stage in the selection is made out. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. July 04, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE