IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11027 of 2010 RAM SHARNAGAT SINGH, S/o Late Janardan Singh, R/o Village Adauri, P.S. Purnahiya, District Sheohar ............... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ................ OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh For the State: Mr. B. Ram, A.P.P. -------- 2 26.04.2010 Heard the parties. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Purnahiya P.S. Case No. 02 of 2006 dated 10.01.2006 registered under Sections 341, 342, 324, 326, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by learned counsel of the petitioner that he is not named in the F.I.R. as an accused and during the course of investigation a suspicion was raised against him, as a result of which, he was arrayed in the category of accused. However, by referring to annexure – 2, it is submitted that on close of investigation accusation against the petitioner was 2 found to be false, and therefore, he was not charge sheeted. However, charge sheet was submitted only against co- accused Uma Shankar Sah. Learned Magistrate disagreed with the Police report and has taken cognizance against the petitioner also, and therefore, he reasonably apprehends his arrest in the aforesaid case. It is also submitted that co- accused Ram Babu Sah and Chhotan Paswan, who were named in the F.I.R., as accused, have been granted anticipatory bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 7.5.2008 (annexure -4). In the aforesaid background, in the event of arrest / surrender within a period of four weeks from today in the above noted case, the above named petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties 3 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri at Sitamarhi, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Praful ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)