1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA. CWPIL N. 22 of 2011 Date of Decision: 30.12.2011 Court on its own motion .. Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of H.P through Principal Secretary (Industries) to the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh Shimla-2. 2. Director, Department of Industries, Udyog Bhawan Shimla- 1. 3. Deputy Commissioner, Kangra, District Kangra, H.P. 4. SDM, Jwali, District Kangra, H.P. 5. M/S Himachal Stone crusher Reali, Tehsil Fatehpur, District Kangra, H.P. through its proprietor, 6. M/S Golden Stone Crusher Reaili, Tehsil Fatehpur, District Kangra, H.P through its proprietor. 7. M/S Raghev Stone crusher Reaili, Tehsil Fathepur, District Kangra, H.P though its proprietor. ..Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : court on its own motion. For the Respondent : Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 4. Deepak Gupta, J (oral) Respondents Kuldeep Singh and Avtar Singh are present in person. They have expressed their 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?yes. 2 apology and assured this Court that in future they will not try to overreach the Court by writing letters in this manner. They have also tendered unconditional apology. The apology accepted and notice is discharged. No order is required to be passed in this CWPIL, since the prayers sought in this CWPIL are identical to the prayers made in CWP No. 1140 of 2010. This petition is accordingly disposed of. (Deepak Gupta), J. December 30, 2011 (Sanjay Karol),J. (priti) 3