IN THE HIHH COORT OP JTCIICAI'UBS ^T BILASPOR (C ^&! WRIT TOTITION N0. " " / ©^2001 BE'CSEEN Smti' prem Rumari Sahu .»aged about 69 ysars, wife of Kanhaialal Sahu, Bai (Narse) ('Brained Mi^ wife),(3Qvt. Ayurved Bispensary, Bheji Kanta,iahsil and ^lstrict;. Bantewgda* \.<n..-^ ^•y> ',<:":' A'' ^^••' ';, ^" I.1 EETECIQNER ..\- R'N:S ffie Sfcate .of Chha-ttisgarh, 'EhrougIi •the Seere-tary Bspartment of Indian Syste» of r'fediclBe Alopatihy, Mantralay, O.K.Baildings, Raipur. Shiv Bianar (SopawaE,- Superlntendait-Gum_Dista-ict; . AyiM-ved Offieer, Ban-tewada . The Sta-t^ Aamii.n^s'tara'bi.ve 'Eribunal^ Erincipal BKtCh fsfit TahsAI and District :^MS:liiajESKSSS|»Saeaaesh) RBSPCHDENIS w WRIl PSTITICN T]NDER ARIICLES 226/227 OB 'EHE eONS'rI'FUTXON OF 3NDIA \w l--««s XI-HC-22 Sil^-^il fewan^ ^3-i{=b •M^fl '3^ "lil<! !!'!<<, 9Til-9'16>. fa;di«lj< W.P. No. 662/2001 ^B s'li^^Rfiwgf?^ +i<)!ri^-i 'iffcR'f •?ts^t Tfsrezre ^ arfsgTi SB^I 6-9-2001 Shri Prashaat M.tsKr^. Advocate for the petitioaer. Shrl Gautam BhadurlL Govt. Advocate for the State. Heard learned counsfel for the parties. Learaed counsel for|the petitioner submits tbat before tbe Trlbunal, the Sjtate had filed a reply and the petltioner prayed for kime for fillng counter affidavlt/ rejoinder which was not gr^nted. '' Having considered the facts and circumstaaces of the case. nnaterial on reco|:d and nature of the dispute regardiag payment o£ salary. la the opinion o£ this Court, it-is just aad proper that| the petition is disposed of with a d.1rection that the jpetitioner may be allowed to submit counter affidavit/nejoinder and thereafter the matter will be decided KAS^I within a reasonable time in accordance with law after hearing the paEtstes / In that vlew of th' ! ;»c, as per rules, Sd/- ChiefJustice matter, the petltion is Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge r'':fts^feq a