^) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C l No.3376/2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS M/s. Century Textiles & Industries A Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its cement plant known as Century Cement at Baikunth, Tahsil Tilda, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Through Mr. B.P. Mishra, Authorized Representative and constituted Attorney. Versus 1 State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Mineral Resources, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya G.E.Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 The Collector, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Mr. Ravi Jaiswal, SeniorAdvocate with Mr. Manish Nigam, Counsel for the petitioner. Mr.Sumesh Bajaj, GovernmsntAdvocateforthe respondents on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (20.07.2011) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. •Heard. The petitioner has challenged the validity of show-cause notice dated 25th May, 2011 (Annexure-P/8) issued under Rule 27 (5) of Mineral Concession Rules 1960 on the allegations ofcertain breach committed by the petitioner. Mr. Jaiswal has argued that the allegations made in the notice are incorrect. Since there does not appear to be apparent lack of jurisdiction or the authority to issue such notice by the concerned authority and that it does not appear to be absolutely non-est, 1 am not inclined to entertain this writ petition at the show-cause stage itself. c^o 1 1S< • s':' ^ '^.' '^/ WRIT PETITION (C ) No.3376/2011 Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of at this stage. However, the petitioner is free to approach the concerned authority to file its detail reply to the show-cause and to raise all the grounds contained in the writ petition before the concerned authority whoshall dispose of the matter in accordance with law. , ___-- -—'~— Sun Sd/- „. aitumarStoba judge -.stSr^ ^ (^- [