^r Babulal Dansena aged about 37 years, S/o. Shri KanhaiRam Dansena Assistant Teacher, Govt. Hr. Sec. School Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, ihrough Seoretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhavi/an, Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Pubiic Instruction Department, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G.) Present: Shri Rakesh Pandey, counsel for the petitioner Shri Arvind Dubey, Pane] Law/er for the State. ^y The question of taw involved herein as to whether the petitioner is sntitied to regular pay scale w.e.f. t.he date of initia!'appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondenSs jointly submiis that the facts and question of lav/ involved in the present '.vrit petition are the same to that of in W.P.(SS No.5976.2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others Vs. State Gbvernment of Chhattisgarh & Othere), which v/as aliowed vids order cated 07.11.2006. 3. in visvif of the above-state submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the viTit petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. ; g^ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge inau