IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 15TH JUNE 2009 / 25TH JYAISHTA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 399 of 2009(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.7769/2009 Dated 12/03/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN WPC -------------------------------- MRIDULA GOPI, AGED 39 YEARS, W/O.GOPI, MANGADATHU VEETTIL, KURUVILASSERI P.O., THRISSUR DT. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR MS.P.A.ANITHA RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------- NAZAR, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, THRISSUR. MR.K.C.SANTHOSHKUMAR, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- C.O.C.No. 399 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 15th day of June, 2009 J U D G M E N T Allegation in this case is regarding the non-compliance of the directions in the judgment in WP(C) No.7769/2009, by which the respondent was directed to consider Ext.P1 application of the petitioner. Although, the complaint is that orders on Ext.P1 have not been passed, the learned Government Pleader has produced before this Court, a copy of order dated 10/06/2009 passed on Ext.P1. A copy of the said order has been served on the learned counsel for the petitioner also. Now that order dated 10/06/2009 has been passed, the remedy of the petitioner is to challenge the said order, if she is aggrieved by the same. Therefore, leaving open her contentions in this regard, this contempt case is closed. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg