1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5461 OF 2009 Ashok s/o Dnyanoba Patil ... PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri T.M. Venjane, Advocate for the petitioner Shri V.G. Shelke, A.G.P. for respondent No.1. Respondent No.5 absent though served Shri S.B. Talekar, Advocate for respondent Nos.6-A to 6-C Shri S.V. Chandole, Advocate for respondent No.7. ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 13th October, 2010 PER COURT : 1. Heard. A very sorry state of affairs, presented by Writ Petition. Already for identical reliefs, Writ Petition No. 3431/2009 was moved by the petitioner. Interim relief was refused by this Court on 5.6.2009. Thereafter, surruptiously the petitioner moved the learned Minister and obtained stay, without disclosing the refusal of relief in Writ Petition No.3431/2009. After this exercise, the petitioner withdrew Writ Petition No. 3431/2009 on 15.6.2009 and then filed the present petition. This is primarily abuse of the process of Court and done with meticulous calculation of the petitioner. This certainly warrants for action. The faith in the system should not be eroded. The 2 role of learned Advocate Mr. Venjane cannot be appreciated. The exercise of petition is nothing but an act of deliberate deception with the design of securing order from this Court. The entire process and papers be sent to the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa, to cause enquiry into the matter as to the conduct of the counsel Mr. Venjane. The petitioner shall pay costs of Rs. 10,000/- to State – respondent Nos.1 to 4, 6 and 7, to be paid/deposited within three months. Writ Petition allowed to be withdrawn. No costs. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/wp5461.09