In the Punjab and Haryana High Court, at Chandigarh. CRM-M-19605 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on Sept 02,2011 Tejinder Pal Singh Khurana --Petitioner vs. State of Punjab and another --Respondents. AND CRM-M-20781 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on Sept 02,2011 Raminder Pal Singh Khurana --Petitioner vs. State of Punjab --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Rohit Sharma,Advocate, for the petitioner(s) Mr.A.S.Rai,DAG, Punjab. Mr.Gurcharan Dass,Advocate, for the complainant Rakesh Kumar Jain,J:(Oral) On 12.8.2011, the following order was recorded by this Court:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) prays for another adjournment to explore the possibility of a compromise between the parties. He submits that if the parties would fail to enter into compromise, then he would withdraw these petitions. On his request, adjourned to 02.9.2011”. Today, an adjournment slip has been filed by the petitioner in which it is alleged that “In the present case, the complainant is not talking with the petitioner regarding compromise. The petitioner seeks one last opportunity to settle the matter. Therefore, kindly adjourn the matter for two weeks only in the interest of justice”. CRM-M-19605 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Learned counsel for the complainant submits that neither the petitioner has approached him nor he is interested in the compromise. Since the petitioner had stated on 12.8.2011 that in case no compromise is arrived at then he would withdraw these petitions, there is no reason to grant any further adjournment for the said purpose. Hence the petitions are dismissed. Sept 02,2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge