Petitioner Resoondents H@jj^yRT OF CHHATTISSARH: BILASPtlR Writ PBUtion (Sl No. 3023 of 2008 Govind Ram Baghel, S/o. Natthuram Baghe!, aged about 58 yeara, posted as Head Master at Giris High Schooi, Jobi, Block Khareiya, District Raigarh (CQ). Versus 1) State of Chhattlsga'h, through the Seoretary, Department of Schoo! Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2) The Joint Director, Pubiic Education Raipur, District Raipur (CG)- 3) Dlstrict Education Cfficer, Raigarh, [Mrid Raigarh (CG). 4) Block Eduo^ion Officer, Kharsiya, Distrid Raigarh (CG). (Writ Petition under Articte 226027 of the Constitutton <rf india.; SB: Hwi'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnlhotri, J. Present: Shri F,S, Khare, oounsetfortheprtitioner. Shri AtokBatehi, Govt. Advocatefortherespaidents/State. ORALORDER (Passed on IS?" day of June,2008) Wtth consent of learned counsel appearing for both ttie parties, the matter is heard finally. 2) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to pressthis petitlon on merit at this stsge. However, the representations dated 8-8-2007 (Annexure -P15) and 25-4-20C®(Annexure- P/6) may be directed to be considered by the concerned authorities. 3) Leamed counsel appearing for the respondertsState fairiy submtts that there is no reason as to why the representations fited by the petrtioner should not be considered, in accordance with taw, on s own merit. 4) In view of the above submission made by S^rned counset appearing for the State, it is expedient to direct the concemed authorities to conskler his ^,-^iSsaa^^ representations as stated above, in aecordance wiffi iaw, on its cnim merit, as eariy as possible, preferabiy within a period of six weeks. 5) tn view of foregoing, the petition ts disposed afwith above-stated direction. . Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge