IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26091 of 2010 KASHI PASWAN, SON OF CHINTA PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05 23.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the First Information Report nor anything has been recovered from his conscious possession. It appears from perusal of the impugned order as well as submissions of the parties that the name of this petitioner came in this case in confessional statement of co- accused Md. Alimuddin. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except the so-called confessional statement of Md. Alimuddin, there is nothing against the petitioner. It is pointed out by him that the petitioner was remanded in this case on 09.03.2010 vide Paragraph No. 176 of the case diary whereas the confessional statement of co-accused Md. Alimuddin was recorded on 14.03.2010 vide Paragraph No. 193 of the case diary. It is also pointed out by him that co- accused Md. Alimuddin has already been granted privilege of bail by this Court. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner pointing out chequered criminal antecedent of the petitioner. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Ashok Paper Mills P.S. Case No. 105 of 2008 subject to condition that one of the sureties must be close relative of the petitioner and shall be holder of landed property. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)