ssp 1 WP 944 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.944 OF 2011 Shridhar Nivruti Khangale and Ors. .....Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.V.D.Raut, for the petitioner. Mr.V.S.Gokhale, AGP, for respondent-State. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATE: 9th FEBRUARY, 2011. P.C. : 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners may file separate petition qua petitioner Nos.2 to 11. The above petition is confined qua petitioner No.1 only. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner No.1 states that the petitioner would like to apply for regularization under Section 53(3) of the M.R.T.P.Act and such application would be preferred within a period of three days from today. If any application is preferred by petitioner No.1, the authorities shall decide the same in accordance with law. However, till the petitioner makes application under Section 53(3) of the Act, status quo is directed to be maintained by both the parties for 3 days from today and thereafter, it is for the authorities to take appropriate action as deemed fit. ssp 2 WP 944 of 2011 3. In view of what is stated above, the writ petition is disposed of. ( A.A.SAYED, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )