1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.5220 of 2007. [Vinod Narayanrao Shingnapure] Vs. [The State of Mah., thro Dy. Director, Industrial Safety and Health] ---------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri Sharad Ghate, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A. S. Sonare, AGP for Respondent. Coram: A. H. JOSHI, J. Dated: 22nd January 2008. 1. The Judgment of Labour Court which is confirmed by the Industrial Court is under challenged. Both the Courts concurrently recorded that the workman has failed to prove that he had served 240 days in the year preceding termination. 2. The petitioner is not able to demonstrate as to how 240 days of service were completed. The spells of service and calculations based thereon done by 2 the Labour Court is not shown to be erroneous. 7. Learned Advocate for the petitioner places reliance on unreported Judgment of this Court rendered in Writ Petition NO.846 of 2006. 8. This Court finds that on the face of the case, the Judgment relied upon has no relevance. 9. Petition has no merit. It is dismissed. JUDGE Sbm