,, ^:<;!:!i:aifc~ /.'^' I 1 ""ii "-•A^®y^.,._ % Sf' 7^/y f.ry /i^ HIGH COVRT OF CHHATTISGAItH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRTT PETITION No. 1003 of2005 Chintamani Patel S/o Late Devnath Patel. aeed about 50 yeara, Ex Saqiaiich, Gram Paiichayat Lendhra, Bloc: Baramkela, Tehsil: Sarangarh Distt.: Raigarh Chhattisgarh. WRSUS 1. State of Chhattisearh Throudi: The Secretarv, Departmeiit of Paichayat and Social welfare, D.K.S. Building, Raipur (G.G.) 2. The Collector, Raigarh, District: Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Zila Paachayat Raigarh, through: Chief Executiv^ OfRcar, Rai^rh, District : Raigarh (C.G.) \ 4. Janpad Paiqchayat, Baiamkela, Through: Chief Executive Qfficer, Bararrikela, Teh : Sarangarh, Distt:Raigarh(C.G.) 5. Sub Divisional OfBcer, Rural Eneineerine Ssrvice, Sarangarh, District: Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 6. Shri Chakradhai- Patel S/o Late Rupdliar Patel, Ex Saq')anch- Gram Panchayat Lendhra, Block: Barainkela, Tehsil : Sarangarh, Dist. Rai^rh Chhattisgarh. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INT)IA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. J. Present: Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate appearing on behalfofShri V.R.Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shn Rajend-a AgrawaL Panel Lawyerforthe State/respondents No. 1, 2 and 5. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Advocstefor the respondent No. 4. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 12tn day of September, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearine for the petitioner, on instmctions, submits that with the passage of time, this petition has become infructuous. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents do not controvert fhe said submission. 2. * Aecordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become in&uctuous. No order asto costs. - -- -—-^-^—- Satish K. Agmhotri Judge Aim