• -] ;-> ' .-<. IN THB HON'BLS HIGH COURT OP CffiiATTZSSflRii AT 3: LASPUR NTit Petition Ito. 2005,n;.,,. ,. a. A'n-..: '? <';.^ "a"/ PETITIONER VERSUS RESPOMDSNTS ^s^' ^.^^-"" ^ ^ ^ '" Babu Lal. predhan, S/o Khemraj pradhan, aged about 49 ysars, Accou.ntant, Posted at as Accountant High School .Jhakharpara, Tahs.il Dsvbhog, District Raipur (C.G.); 1) State of Chhattisgarh Througi-i- The Secretary, Department of School Education Depart-menfc, Raipur (G.c-<).: 2) Tha District Educstion Officer, Raipur Division, Raipur (C.G.}; 3) The B-lock Bducation Officer, Qevbhog, District Raipur (C.G.) .i-^f.rVX' ^,\ •/ '-" ^fi.^ - Ci£ ta &• °• 4) The Joint Director, Treasury and Accc.unts, Raipur Division, Raipur (C*Q.)«- .WRIT_P3TITION UIMD2RARTICLE 226 OE* THS ^ !-PT-T"? ^n-i'..T.'%rPTrP' ONSTITUTION O? INQIJs XI-HC-22 1T5? '^ii<i!!rt4. •®TiteTIS.T^iTBg? sn^siT ft;iI??3Ji^?T ^RT^"?ij?%' in /\ .). ^ IMI.A^i^., „ ., _^,_ »11 l 200. Lfe£:.^r:^i_5S.^.6::^:^ a:n^i'^gTwgfs^i qiNcTO^T'qPRif 4 fezt ^3R?R ^T 3TP;TtT .CT^I Shri Malay Bhaduri, counsel for Ae petitioner. SiTri Satish Gupta, Dy. Adv. for State, ori advance cc.py. Applieation for urgent heaiing is ^lowed. Heard. Counsel for the petitionpr subin(s that he has fUed this petition aaainst th.e memo dated 20-12-2002 wfaerein it has ibeen stated tfaat smce the petitioner has not submitted Hindi Typing Certtficate, t}(erefore, if in fature, the increments ars recovered, he hiiiiselfndB be responsib!e for tliat. ^Leanied • State counsel subimts |thai the petinoner has not subiiurred any reprssentation and he may be directfcd to make a representation bsfore the respondents. i • Ha'i.'ma considered and mthout ixpressins any opimon on ths merits of the case, in the opmion of this Court, ends cjfjustice wil! t>e sep/ed if a direetion is siven t . to the petitioner to make a detailed reptesentation raising lus grie'.'ances before the i ~ ' • competent aut2iority ofrespondents alonfe <nth a copy ofthe petition and tllis order within ttvo weets from today and on si^eh representation beina ffled. the eompetent authorifr of respondents shall decide th^ sams on its own merits m accordance v/itb law as eariy as possible preferabh" n'ittm( two montlis from die date of receipt of the representation. It is made clear that if anj' grievance remains, tiie petitioner may avail the remedv avaibble under tlie !aw. 1 Vvith the aforesaid obseivations, ttris petition staads disposed of. M.W.P. No. 9758/2005 also stan^s disposed of. Certifiecl copy as per ruies. 1 _______^-^- Takhruddin Judge