IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2189 of 2009 Gauri Sah, Son of late Saryug Sah, Resident of Village Srirampur, P.S.+Anchal- Gaunaha, District West Champaran. -------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Collector, West Champaran, Bettiah. 3. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Narkatiaganj, West Champaran. 4. The Anchal Adhikari, Gaunaha Anchal, West Champaran. 5. Raj Kumar Sah, Son of late Baidya Nath Sah. 6. Anil Sah, Son of Late Baidya Nath Sah. 7. Sushil Sah, Son of Late Baidya Nath Sah. Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 are residents of Village-Srirampur, P.s.+Anchal Gaunaha, District West Champaran. ------- Respondents ----------- 3 21.04.2010 Since this Court has restored this case today by a separate order in MJC No. 1017 of 2009, it is also inclined to take up the hearing of this case on merit, which is pending still at the admission stage. By the impugned order all that has been done is that the mutation has been allowed and the petitioner being aggrieved by the same has filed this writ application. It is well settled that by mutation neither the title is created nor is extinguished. Any aggrieved person can definitely get such mutation questioned before the competent civil court, which alone can declare the title and possession. With the aforementioned observations, this application is dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)