IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34695 of 2008 INTEKHAB ALAM @ MD.BABAR ALI S/O ZAKIR HUSSEIN, R/O VILLAGE- BHAGWATIPUR, P.S.- SINGHWARA, DISTRICT- DARBHANGA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 14/01/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel representing the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant. On 10.11.2007 notice was issued to the complainant O. P. No. 2 on the statement of the petitioner that he was willing to revive matrimonial harmony. The complaint case has been filed hardly within a year of completion of marriage of the complainant with the petitioner. Allegation of various types of torture has been levelled. Learned counsel for the petitioner has denied the allegation of torture and has submitted that petitioner was apprehending some untoward implication at the hands of the complainant so he had filed an informatory petition before the C.J.M. six months prior to the present case. The petitioner is the husband of the complainant and notice was issued to her only at the instance of the petitioner as he has shown his willingness to revive the matrimonial harmony but today the petitioner is not ready to revive the matrimonial harmony. Considering the above facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Complaint Case No. 2518 of 2007 - 2 - pending in the court of the S.D.J.M., (East), Muzaffarpur. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail taking the plea which he has taken here, which shall be disposed of without being prejudiced by this order. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)