IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No 26 of 1992 with CIVIL APPLICATION No 223 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- VIRA KACHRA Versus JAGJIVAN VIRA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Appeal from Order No. 26 of 1992 MR DEEPAK M SHAH for Petitioners MR SURESH M SHAH for Respondent No. 1 2. Civil ApplicationNo 223 of 1992 MR DEEPAK M SHAH for Petitioners MR SURESH M SHAH for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 17/12/98 ORAL JUDGEMENT Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. As a result of the hearing and discussion, a consensus has been arrived at between the learned counsel, on the basis of which following directions are given : (1) The trial court shall hear and dispose of the pending Suit as expeditiously as possible and in any case, not later than 30th April, 1999. In view of the aforesaid directions, learned counsel for the appellant does not press this appeal for any further relief and the same is acordingly disposed of with no order as to costs. Since main appeal has been disposed of to-day, the above application also does not survive and is accordingly disposed of. Rule is discharged with no order asto costs. The registry is directed to send yadi to the trial court forthwith that is to say not later than 22nd December, 1998.Direct service is permitted. mim/-