IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.36364 OF 2009 1. SAVITRI DEVI @ SUNITA DEVI, WIFE OF BASUDEO MODI 2. ANIL MODI, SON OF BASUDEO MODI 3. CHHOTU MODI SON OF BASUDEO MODI 4. SUNITA DEVI, WIFE OF ANIL MODI, ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE KHAIRA, P.S. KHAIRA, DISTRICT JAMUI………………………………….…PETITIONERS VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR…….. OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 3. 12.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The case is under sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioners are mother-in-law, brothers of the husband of the deceased and wife of one of the brothers. It appears that father-in-law of the deceased had moved for bail and his application was allowed by order dated 14.09.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No.25600 of 2009. After going through the said order passed in the case of the father-in-law of the deceased, the application of these petitioners is also allowed for the reasoned stated in the order. Let petitioners, namely, Savitri Devi @ Sunita Devi, Anil Modi, Chhotu Modi and Sunita Devi, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the - 2 - satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in Khaira P.S. Case No.211/08 with conditions as laid down in sub-section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioners. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioners and take steps for their arrest. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)