1 S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 686/2006 (Asu Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of Order: June 01, 2006 HON'BLE MR. H.R. PANWAR, J. Mr. S.K. Pooniya, for the petitioner. Mr. JPS Chaudhary, Public Prosecutor for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the non- bailable warrant issued against him and, therefore, submits that it may be converted into a bailable warrant. From the perusal of the impugned order, it appears that in S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 181/2005, by the order dated 17-4-2006, it was directed that the petitioner be impleaded as an accused and be tried together with the accused already facing trial. In compliance of that order, a non-bailable warrant has been issued against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will appear before the trial Court on 10-6-2006 and move a regular bail application and till then, non-bailable warrant issued against him may not be executed. In view of the statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to appear before the trial Court on 10-6-2006. Till 10-6-2006, the non-bailable warrant 2 against the petitioner shall not be executed. However, it is made clear that if petitioner fails to surrender before the trial Court on 10-6-2006, it will be open for the trial Court to secure the presence of the petitioner by non-bailable warrant. The criminal miscellaneous petition stands disposed of accordingly. (H.R. PANWAR), J. mcs