IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25189 of 2010 SANJEEV KUMAR SINGH @ SANJEEV SINGH, son of Jaglal Singh Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/- 25.10.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 304(B)/ 201 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that in the First Information Report the informant has stated that when he came to meet his sister ( the deceased) he did not find her there and on asking the family members they did not give any satisfactory reply. Thereafter, the informant asked the neighbors who disclosed that the deceased had been done to death by her in-laws. On going through the case diary I find that there is no witness in support of this fact. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 14.10.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or 2 any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Mashrak P.S. Case No. 44 of 2005 subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Ashwini/- ( Anjana Prakash, J. )