IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8653 of 2011 DIWESH SINGH @ DHANDHAN SINGH @ DEVESH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 23.03.2011. Heard. During the course of the hearing a copy of order dated 4.11.2010 was produced which was passed by the F.T.C.V, Aurangabad in Sessions Trial No.90 of 2010 which indicates that only when this court had passed a three pages order on 9.12.2009 that the petitioner could be produced before the learned trial Judge along with other accused persons. On that particular date, i.e., 4.11.2010 when the court was directing to sign the margin of the record which is mandatory so as to remanding the accused to custody, the petitioner was refusing simply to sign it. It is indicated by the above order that the charges have been framed but it is further indicated as to how disobedient the present petitioner could be towards the Presiding Judge of a court who is authorized to seek signatures or thumb impression of an accused in token of passing the remand order. It was desirable that the court below ought 2 to have proceeded under the appropriate provision of law for summarily trying the petitioner for contempt of his court and should have inflicted the imprisonment as is indicated by Section 345, etc of the Cr.P.C. As regards the prayer for bail, considering the merits and considering the conduct of the petitioner, the court is not inclined to direct his release of the petitioner on bail. Prayer is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)