.{1}. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.22 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.19 OF 2008 Uttam Kisan Bhagat and 5 others. ..Petitioners. Versus Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporation and 2 others. ..Respondents. ... Mr.Sugandh B. Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioners. Mr.S.S.Pakale, Advocate with Ms.Shobha Ajeet Kumar, Advocate for respondent - B.M.C.. ... CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : 9TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATED : 9TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATED : 9TH FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners does not want to press the Notice of Motion, but, submits that as this decision taken by the Corporation is of the year, 1982 and is not implemented yet, the Petition requires to be heard expeditiously. The learned Counsel appearing for the respondent has no objection. We, therefore, permit the Notice of Motion to be withdrawn. Notice of Motion is dismissed as withdrawn. 2. Hearing expedited. [J.N.PATEL,J.] [J.N.PATEL,J.] [J.N.PATEL,J.] .{2}. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]