Sink Benci V. ' 'T R 4 RIMI HE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU CNAL APPEAL NO 33¥/ 2009 :Pitu@P’it‘am’b~er, _ S/oShyam‘o Yada‘v _ Aged 'ab'o‘ut 42 years ‘ N.» ay) \w ' ‘ . ‘ Occupation Cultlvatlon :k5v ; R/o Village Kodamal PS Lal|ung TvTehSIl Gharghoda Dist— Ralgarh (C G 97 V§§Q '/ ' _, Ve'r’su‘s' - ‘ State of Chhattlsgarh Through P S Lallunga - . v Dust- Ralgarh (C G) PEAL-J’ UIS' 374‘ (2) ’ O‘FfTH'E {CODE OF’ i , M 1% a ) ? HI$H CGU?!” Q? CHHATTESKA§H AT 3iLa?UR ”mam wmh Ham big iVkr Jushcz Pmtmkvr ’Dawaker Crsmmal Aggeai No.337 of 253%? Pim©Pimmbev APPELLANT Vwwg REsPGNDENT Sm’re of CEihQTT§$garh Mr. Rchui Tamaskcr, coun$e§ far The. appelmm, Mr Vivek Shaman IPL for The resmnden‘rlSmTe. RIMINAL APPWAL U\mc§ SttZTEON 3M g2§ 0?" THE CGEE: Or "RIMINAL PR6€EDUR¢ ‘Tubée‘UXENT {27134.201 1} Tmg appeal Es :jireci'ed aaawas? we impugned judgmen? and crder‘ da’fed 283.2%09 passed y 4 h AdrWM :a! Ses :cns Judge (F56? Traak $cum‘), Facaigcrh in $assians Tria§ No. i22/20Q8 convicfing ”fife accused/appeiian? fgr The G‘ffanca gunishabie umdar' Sec’rion 43? C of The Immin Pwm wr‘a and spm‘enrma .m h; undbrga wgamus §m§3r§sa1nmenf far fixa: years. and pay fine a? RslDQD, in defauH‘ of gaymen‘t 0f fine fa: furi‘iaer undzrgc rigawus §mprisonmenf far ihrae momhs. 2. Briaf fads cf fhg casa are thafr an 27.72008 informaticn was racdvgd“ bv h” \lwrma {'PW—SW “r0 fha' affam“ im? 'fhe accuéad/Qppemw Jeak m fak? current“; naTe< Easeti on Wis Informm‘wn acmwcl/ahgei4m’t svcr apprehevmjad near We Vilage {adamai and m cur‘wncy na‘mrs G‘F EQQ danomma?20n wem faund m ‘rh? ”W‘key 0f m$ mm‘nrcwi? Eem‘h Mahdi: (Ex RM was reysfawd cm ?7 7' ?OOR (mu m ‘Hw ha<i< OT “‘hzs 5: ? Q (Ex “6) was regssfwad on 273.2008 ii'saéfz The curremy Hams wam gem” ‘:or examma‘hm 1'0 Curremy Ném Prass, Na5%k Road aréci affar maceiving ?§1e rapar‘f (ExzP—§}, fhe chr’r‘? shag? wé$ fi'iad an 30.9.2098 under Sam‘mn 489 A k) 3, C : D cf fh lndkm 9a! Carl gainsf we accusedz’appdim’r. Haever‘, ‘fhe was” bgow framad ‘ihe charge. againsé‘ ’rhe accused/aweléan? under Secfion 489 E & C f fhe ndian Penai Cade. 3. Ié’n orr m gsmbéish fine gum? of The accwed/appaHanT, ‘ri’xe pmsecufion has examéned as many as four wimgsse Sfm‘emen? cf ‘s‘iqe mausedxap‘gei3m‘f wag :asg mazr‘ded under Secfian 313 f The Coda 0' rimim! Pracadum whic he dgniad The. charges !eve!led agng him cmd pkaded is immeme cmfi fake implica‘riam m :Pha CGSe. 4. Af‘?er hegring the parfies ‘tha ria! Coum‘ has cmvic‘red and senfenced ma accusedz’appeHmi‘ for ‘s‘hsa affence as mentioned abcva. 5, Heard counsel far The parties and perused The material avaiiabie on reccrd includmg The judgmem impugned. 6. Counsai for the appe!§anf submi'fs fhm‘ he is n0? pressing fhis appeal sa far- as i? relm‘es m fhe cmvicfion par? cf we impugned judgmgm and wouid have <1 limited prayer with respaci ‘ia ihg semance par? ‘ihereof cniy. Ha submi‘is Thai: fine appeiicmi has aiready remained in jaii fer abou‘r Two years and five monfhs and oniy aiiegm‘ian against him is The? he was faund in pessession 0f 14 currency nO‘ies The? Too he had kepT fhe same in fine diekey of his i mc‘ior cycie and 'ihai he daes net have any criminai anteceden? and, Therefore, na usefui purpose wouid be served in furiher keeping him in jaii and ii” wouid be in ihe infer-es? of jusfice if The senience \\ ' imposed on him is reduced 1‘0 ‘ihe period aiready undergone by ihem. i He furfher submiis fha’r ihe fine amount may be enhanced To “ihe s— ’ sui’tabie amount» i (g e m a a w ? i o I de s‘ ’ i cc o ? C in h ai h f i 7. On the m‘has" hand, counsel “for The Sm’re sugaporfiné The impugnad judgmzm‘ sub.its fhcn‘ far f‘hg daring act of The appe’kian’r, m lamency ha shown To him while impesing punishment under Secfian 489 C of Thg Inditzn Pena! Sada. 8, Acccrdingiy, The. convictien par? cf The judgment impugned is mainfained. Howevgr, keeping in View of The fcm‘ Tha‘? The hypeilanf has airearjy remained in jail far- abouf Two year‘s and five. mon‘rhs and fha’r he daee no“; have any criminal anieeedeh‘r and, Therefore his seniehce is reduced i0 The per-iad aiready undergone by him. Hawever, in lieu iheaaeef, fine of R3. 1,0QO/- impaeed by ihe Trial Caur‘i is enhanced To Rs. 11,QOOI—. This adciiiional amoun'i 0f Rs. 10,0QO/- is directed To be deposited befare ihe caum‘ beiow wifhin a period of faun men’rhs from The da‘ie of receip'i of capy 0f This arder. This arder wauld aperm‘e aniy if ihe appeiian? deposits ihe fine amaun‘i as direcied by This cour‘i. On such amoun‘i being deposiTed, The appeiianT shali be released wiThauT my deiay if nOT required in any aTher case. 9 A Appeal Thus parTly sucree w ds ’ Pritinker Sdl— Diwaker Judge ,I’Hf .