.{1}. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.357 OF 2008 Amitabh Samar Roy @ Amit Rana. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .. Ms.Rebecca Gonsalvez, Adv. for the Petitioner. Mr.H.J.Dedhia, APP, for the State. .. CORAM : S.B.MHASE AND CORAM : S.B.MHASE AND CORAM : S.B.MHASE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : MARCH 18, 2008. DATED : MARCH 18, 2008. DATED : MARCH 18, 2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. 2. The application of the petitioner for furlough came to be rejected. The reason for rejection of the application for furlough was that the petitioner had earlier proposed his mother as the surety. However on the police making enquiries with the mother of the petitioner, she refused to stand as surety for him, hence the application for furlough came to be rejected. As the application for furlough has been .{2}. rejected on the sole ground that the earlier person refused to stand as surety, we are inclined to pass the following order :- ORDER ORDER ORDER (i) The petitioner be released on furlough on usual terms and conditions, on the petitioner furnishing suitable surety. (ii) Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [S.B.MHASE,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [S.B.MHASE,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [S.B.MHASE,J.]