1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 539 OF 2009 1. Nirmalabai W/o Govind Ghongade and others .. .. Appellants Versus 1. Savitribai W/o Govind Ghongade Died and others 2. Shivkantabai W/o Kalidas .. .. Respondents Shri M. L. Dharashive, Advocate for the Appellants. The Respondent No. 1 abated vide Court’s order dated 12.06.2009 Shri R. B. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Respondents No. 2 to 5. CORAM : N. D. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 10TH DECEMBER, 2009. ORAL ORDER : 1. Heard Shri Dharashive, learned counsel for the appellants and Shri R. B. Deshmukh, learned counsel for the respondents No. 2 to 5. This second appeal is opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents. It is pointed out that in the present suit for partition and separate possession in the estate of deceased Govind Ghongade both the Courts below decreed the claim of the original plaintiffs No. 2 to 5/respondents No. 2 to 5 being the legitimate children and legal heirs of the deceased Govind, so also in the same suit for partition claim of defendants No. 2 to 5 was also 2 considered for equal share of 1/8th each. 2. There are concurrent findings recorded in favour of the plaintiffs No. 2 to 5, so also original defendants No. 2 to 5. As such, there is no substantial question of law either to be framed or to be decided requires any consideration. Upon consideration of record and after hearing both the sides no case is made out by the appellants for admission of the appeal. The second appeal stands dismissed summarily at the stage of admission. Second appeal is disposed. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] bsb/Dec.09