1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7951 OF 2009 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3319 OF 1992 Centron Industrial Alliance Ltd., Plot No. 2 & 16, MIDC, 1A, Chikalthana, Aurangabad. .. Petitioner Versus Smt. Gayabai Jagannath Puri, H-48/3, Shrikrishna Nagar, Hudco, Aurangabad and another. .. Respondents ... Mr. R.P.Pawar,Advocate, for petitioner(Absent). Mr. Ulhas S. Sawaji Advocate, holding for Mr. T.K. Prabhakaran, Advocate for respondent No.1. ... CORAM : K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 10TH AUGUST, 2009. PER COURT : 1. Mr. R. Bhargav, Administrative Manager of 2 the petitioner is present in the Court. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1 identifies him, as Administrative Manager of the petitioner. 2. Heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1. This Civil Application is preferred by both the parties for disposing of the Writ Petition in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b), on condition that whatever amount deposited by the petitioner before the Industrial Court, respondent No. 1 may be permitted to withdraw the same without any condition. These facts are agreed by both the parties in the present Civil Application. Prayer clause (a) and (b) of the present Civil Application read as under. "(a) Allow the Application in the above terms and to dispose of the Writ Petition accordingly and oblige. (b) Allow this Application in terms of prayer 3 clause (a) above." 3. Considering these facts, Writ Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b), which reads as under: "(b) After going through the records and proceedings of the Revision (ULP) No. 33 of 1991, this Hon'ble High Court be pleased to set aside and quash the impugned Order dated 15th July 1992, by a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ, Direction or Order in the nature of Certiorari.", Respondent No. 1 is entitled to withdraw the amount deposited by the petitioner in Industrial Court, Aurangabad unconditionally, as stated in Para 2 of the present Civil Application No. 7951 of 2009. 4. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances, Civil Application is allowed and Writ Petition No. 3319 of 1992 is disposed of 4 finally accordingly. No order as to costs. [ K.K. TATED, J.] sut/AUG09/ca7951.09