IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 22ND DECEMBER 2009 / 1ST POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 36986 of 2009(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ 1. SUMESH.T.S. DIALYIS TECHINICIAN, NADAKAVIL HOSPITAL, VALANCHERRY, MALAPPURAM DIST. 2. SHIBU.P.S. DIALYSIS TECHNICIAN, SREE SUDHEENDRA MEDICAL MISSION, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-18. 3. SREESABARISH.C.D., S/O. T.K.DAMODARAN, SREESABARI NILAYAM, KUNNATHERU, NANMINDA KOZHIKODE DIST. 4. ANEESH.T.A. DIALYSIS TECHNICIAN, NADAKAVIL HOSPITAL, VALANCHERRY, MALAPPURAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. SR.GOVT.PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 36986 OF 2009 (P) ===================== Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioners have undergone the course Post Graduate Diploma in Dialysis Technology (PGDDT). The course has now been changed and what is now in vogue is Diploma in Dialysis Technology (DDT). Aggrieved by this, petitioners have filed Ext.P6 before the Chief Minister onwards and wants an order from this Court to consider the said representation. Whether the course to be run by the PGDDT or DDT is essentially a matter of policy and it is up to the Government to decide and implement the same. This Court has no role in such matters unless it is tainted by extreme cases of arbitrariness. In this case, no such ground could be made out. I am not persuaded to interfere. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp