IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1516 of 2006 Between: G. Krishna Rao @ Hari Krishna Rao, S/o. Raghunath Rao, R/o. 1-7-1022/25, Ramnagar, Hyderabad, ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Station House Officer, Musheerabad Police Station, Hyderabad, 2 Assistant Commissioner of Police, Chikkadapally, Hyderabad, 3 Commissioner of Police Hyderabad, 4 G. Uma Devi W/o. G. Prabhu Kesava Swamy Nagar, Jiaguda, Hyderabad, .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:NONE APPEARED Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3:AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal. This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent Nos.1 to 3 in harassing the petitioner at the instance of respondent No.4 as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that in connection with a case instituted by respondent No.4 under Section 125 Cr.P.C., non-bailable warrant was issued against the son of the petitioner and that the petitioner is not required by respondent Nos.1 to 3. The statement of the learned Assistant Government Pleader is taken on record and the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.1806 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 5th JUNE, 2009. kvni