In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... Criminal Misc. No.M-10980 of 2010 ..... Date of decision:21.7.2010 Jarnail Singh .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab .....Respondent .... Present: Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. T.S. Salana, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State. Mr. G.K. Saini, Advocate for respondent No.2. ..... S.S. Saron, J. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from H.C. Tarsem Singh, Police Station Dasuya, has submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation and in the inquiry conducted by the DSP, Dasuya, he has been found innocent. Therefore, his custody is not required for the purposes of investigation. Learned counsel for the complainant disputes the position and submits that the matter is still to be inquired into by the higher Police Officer and the report even if given by the DSP, Dasuya cannot be said to be final. The complainant may pursue his remedy before the higher Police Officer, however, keeping in view the fact that the State does not require the custody of the petitioner for the purposes of investigation, the interim bail granted on 13.4.2010 is made absolute. Cr. Misc. No.M-10980 of 2010 [2] The criminal miscellaneous petition stands disposed of. July 21, 2010. (S.S. Saron) Judge *hsp*