9^ ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHhfATnSGARHAT BILASPUR fC.G.) REVIEW PETITION N0;JJ ^&?0 APPLICANT ^APPELLANT ^ NON-APPLICANTNo.l: 1. fiESPQNDENTNo, 1 *",.-•• ^ NON-APPLICANT N0.2 Z.' RESPONDENT N0.2 .Prashant Kumar Das, Son of Shri Umakant Das, aged about 29 years, Resident of Village Deurgaon, Karanji, Tahsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS , KumariMangal Deyee, Daughter of Shri Baliram, aged about 17 years (minor), Through : Natural guardian and father Bali Ram Son ofShri Ludru, aged about 40 years, Resident of Village Deurgaon, Padargudapara, Tah. Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.), TheNew India Insurance Co.Ltd. Through : Branch Manager, Jagadalpur, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh) ^^•-' APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 114 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROGEDURE FOR REVIEW OF ORDER DATEDST9-03-2010. ^> ^jl,.H.^ PASSED IN MISCELLANEOUS APEAL N0~'4g8/_2004, BY THE SINGLE BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. PRESIDED OVER BY HON'BLE SHRIJUSTICEN.K. AGRAWAL fANNEXDRF A-l) The applicant/ appellant most humbly and respectfully begs to preferthis Review on the following facts arid grounds amongst others :- XI-HC—78 Q^ "S^r "41-41d-4, ^ly'lco, fsxniyy (^ew-i^. ^- f^o. S? 1^0 (& 200 SII^ITSRT ('yf^^T) an^i ^ii f<;-f1«b 'tTSfT 3TT^?T ^tfft^ TOIIW ^if?g aii^i MoiTlbte Snri Jystice N.K. ABaihwaf tie 28-04.2010 Shri R.N. Jha,counse! for the Learned counsei for the ^i inadvertence, he submitted that the under Section 30 of the Workmen's deposited by the appticant whereas the applicant vide recelpt No.69 dat^d dated 22-12-2004. Record of M.A. is perused. jt appears that vide receipt has been deposited by the appe'lant. Considering the above fact, review appilcatlon deser/es to be a! In view of above, the revlew No.498/2004 is restored to its original Let M.A. No.498/2004 be If^ vacation. A copy of the order be tagged <*)iqf<rl4l'1 "RT^ff ^ fe^ ^FsR^R ^? 3TRFT 3I!$!?[ ipplicant. pplicant submits that due to imount reguired to be deoosited ^ompensation Act, has not been same has been deposited by 21-09-2004 and receipt No.78 (Arjnexures A'2 & A/3), the amount ih the opinion of thls Court, th< olwed. ^ppiication Is aiiowed and M.A. Inumber. {ted immedlateiY after summer kith M.A. No.498/2004. Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge