IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI THURSDAY, THE 1ST OCTOBER 2009 / 9TH ASWINA 1931 WP(Crl.).No. 213 of 2009(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- ROHINI,W/O.ASHOKAN,AGED 45 YEARS, ASHADAM,VILAYIL MULA,KEEZHATTINGAL P.O., CHIRAYINKIL TALUK,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI. K.SIJU SRI.A.MUHAMMED RAFFI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ATTINGAL,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADAKKAVOOR,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 3. SHAMMAD,S/O.MUNEER,KOCHUMANAKKADU, NEAR KAULAVI JUNCTION,VAKKOM P.O., KADAKKAVOOR,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADDL.R4 IMPLEADED ADDLR4: THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PONNANI, MALAPPURAMDISTRICT (IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 3.8.09 IN I.A.No. 9274/09 IN W.P.(Crl.) 213/09) ADV. SRI.S.VIJI FOR R4 &R3 SRI.P.K.MUHAMMED FOR R3 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI K.J.MOHAMMED ANZAR FOR R1-2 SRI.P.K.MUHAMMED FOR ADDL.R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(Crl.)No.213 OF 2009 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 1st DAY OF OCTOBER, 2009 J U D G M E N T Basant, J. This judgment must be read in continuation of the orders passed earlier resting on the order dated 16.9.2009. The alleged detenue Veena and the 3rd respondent have already got married and have produced the certificate to confirm the registration of marriage under the Special Marriage Act. There was a prayer last time that the passport of the alleged detenue is available in the house of the petitioner. It was agreed that the same shall be returned to the alleged detenue today, by the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner after taking instructions submits today that the passport is not available with the petitioner. The same was given for renewal. After renewal, it was sent in the name of the alleged detenue, but, as she was not available it was returned, submits the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the 3rd respondent submits that necessary steps shall be taken and this proceedings can now be closed. W.P.(Crl.)No.213/09 -2- 2. In the circumstances, we are satisfied that no further directions are necessary in this Writ Petition. This Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as agreed. R.BASANT, JUDGE. M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE. dsn