IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45618 of 2009 MANISH KUMAR @ KARU SINGH, SON OF BALMIKI SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 17/02/2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction in the prayer portion of the application. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that there is only suspicion against the petitioner that he, by dubious means, had withdrawn money from various ATMs of different persons but, there is no direct material to support the same, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 4.10.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Gaya Rail P.S. Case No. 141 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the 2 proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)