1 Crim.Appln. No.3176/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3176 OF 2010 Amit Singh Gill ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.Niranjan Mundargi for the Applicant. Mrs.P.P. Bhosale, APP for the State. Mrs.Sulabha V. Rane i/b. M/s.Parab & Associates for Responent No.2. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : JULY 27, 2010 P.C. :- 1 Heard Counsel for the applicant and Counsel for respondent no.2. 2 This is an application for quashing the complaint filed by respondent no.2 by consent. 3 A complaint was filed by respondent no.2 for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 of the IPC. A chargesheet was filed and case is now pending in the Esplanade Court, Mumbai 2 Crim.Appln. No.3176/2010 vide C.C.No.46/P/2003. 4 Respondent no.2  original complainant has filed an affidavit-in-reply in which he has stated that he has no objection if the said complaint is quashed since the parties have amicably settled the dispute. 5 In view of the judgments in the cases of Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab, reported in AIR 2008 Supreme Court 1969 and the judgment in the case of Jagdish Chanana & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Anr., reported in AIR 2008 Supreme Court 1968, there is no impediment for quashing the complaint where principal allegation is under Section 420 of the IPC. 6 Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)