IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.3196 of 2008 Date of Decision:- 29.5.2008 Mukhdwar Singh .....Petitioner(s) through Mr.Amit Jain, Advocate. vs. Sawinder Singh and others .....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) The petitioner-judgment debtor is aggrieved at the order dated 6.2.2008 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Division)-cum- Executing Court, Ajnala, whereby the petitioner's objections in an execution petition have been turned down. The respondent-decree-holder filed an execution petition to seek a direction to the petitioner to execute the sale deed in terms of judgment and decree dated 7.3.2000 which has attained finality. Opposing the above-stated execution application, the petitioner filed objections alleging that in view of clause 4(3) of the Punjab Package Deal Properties Disposal Rules, 1976 in terms whereof the subject land was allotted to him, he cannot transfer or alienate the same for a period of 20 years from the date of allotment. According to the petitioner, since the land was transferred in C.R.No.3196 of 2008 -2- his favour vide certificate dated 12.8.1997, therefore, for a period of 20 years i.e. till the year 2017, he cannot be compelled to execute the sale deed regarding the said property. The learned Executing Court has, however, turned down the aforesaid objection and rightly so, as the alleged agreement between the petitioner and the allottee binds the parties to the said agreement and not the decree-holder. No case to interfere with the impugned order, therefore, is made out. Dismissed. May 29, 2008 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE