IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11822/2008 Decided on:27.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Sohan Singh and another. …Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. and another. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioners : Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Case of the petitioners, in a nutshell, is that they have been appointed as Work Inspectors and have completed ten years continuous service with 240 days in each calendar year. However, their case for regularization has not been considered by the respondents. 2. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for regularization in case they have completed ten 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 years continuous service with 240 days in each calendar year, after seeking their options, as per principles laid down in Gauri Dutt and others versus State of H.P., reported in Latest HLJ 2008 HP 306. Needful be done within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 27.12.2010 *awasthi*