r r: AW ‘ ~ w m £9 EEG}! CGE3RT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR W.P.gS} No. 5705 of 2007 PETETIQNER$ 1 Sah'k Ram Kauch€ S/o Shri Gaotaliha Kauchs, Ag€ aboui 38 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Pinkapar, Block — Chhuria, Disti, — Rajnaxlcigaon (C.G.) Pravesh Kumar Gajbhiye Sjo Shri Mayaram Gajbhiye Age about 37 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Girls Primaty School, Belargondi, Block —- Chhuria, Distt. - Rajanaxmlgaon (C.G.) ‘ Anand Kumar Khemdelwai Sfo Shn' L ‘ A Lahnuram Khandelwal Age about 88 ' ‘7 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Boys Primary School, Chanda, Block — Chhmia, Distt. — Rajnemdgaon (C.G.) Bhushal1 Das Wadekar S/o Shn' 'Pargemiya Wadekar Age about 88 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Bhanitola, Block — Chhun‘a, Distt. — Rajnemdgaon (C.G.} liey‘sus RESPQNDENTS 1 State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S, Bhawarl, Raipur(C.G.) 2 District Education OEicer Distt. Rajnandgaon {(3. G.) iWrit Petiiion unéer Article 2260f the Constitution of India) O). Amgeai'ance: ; Shm' Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioners. \x Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the State on advance copy. GRAL QRDER (17.09.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard 011 admission Leanled counsel for the. petitioners submits That the petin'oners have passed B.’l‘.l. examination on Their own expenses, therefore, they are entitled to receive two advance increments according to circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.031999. He also submits that in many identical matters, the petitions have been allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yoshwant Kumar Bharadw' Vs. Municipal n 2 % W.P,(S) N0. 5705/2007 Corparatimgz Burg and «mathar {2006 (m WJR-CG 95}. Hf: submits that the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the Said Judgment. This legal position is not disputed by the learned counsel for the State. However, he submiis that the order may be passed in terms of the said judgment, but it shall be subjected to verification regarding petitioners’ such qualification. Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed 1'31 terms of the order passed 1'11 case of Yashwcmt Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Flum’cipa? Corporation} Durg and another {Supra} subject to verification of the facts as to whether the petitioners had acquired B.T.I. Examination Certificates on their own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 ahd 01.03.1999 and further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. costs. The petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to r Sd/- Sunil Kumal‘ smha Judge vatg