IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 404 of 2009 Mridul Sharma & others. .……… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand & others. .……… Respondents Mr. H.S. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, Asst. Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for respondent No. 4. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Mridul Sharma, petitioner No. 1 in person. He is identified by Mr. H.S. Sharma, Advocate appearing for the petitioners. Smt. Shilpa Sharma, respondent No. 4 in person. She is identified by Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate appearing for her. Compromise Deed (Raazi Nama) executed on 1st April, 2009 has been filed along with the petition as Annexure No. 3. I have talked to both petitioner No. 1 as well as respondent No. 4 and they have admitted before me that they have compromised the matter and resolved all their past differences and disputes. Respondent No. 4 says that she does not want to prosecute the petitioners any more. Because of the aforesaid, this petition is allowed and the proceedings arising out of Case Crime No. 63 of 2009 under Sections 498-A, 323, 316 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, are quashed with all the consequences. (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 11.05.2009 G