1 wp8997.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8997 OF 2010 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8999 OF 2010 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9000 OF 2010 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9001 OF 2010 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9002 OF 2010 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9004 OF 2010 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9005 OF 2010 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9011 OF 2010 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9016 OF 2010 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. K.C. Sant, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, Advocate for respondent no.1. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 2nd May, 2011 Heard Advocate Mr. Sant for petitioner, Advocate Mr. Yawalkar for respective consumers. 2 wp8997.10 2. The controversy is covered by decision of this Court dated 23.12.2010 in Writ Petition no. 5223/2009 and other matters. District Consumer Forum has no jurisdiction to pierce the vail of incorporation and order recovery against the property of persons or individual Managing Committee members. I have followed this judgment in Writ Petition nos. 11067 and 11071 of 2010 on 21.02.2011. 3. In this view of the matter, it is apparent that the impugned orders are without jurisdiction and unsustainable. Therefore same are quashed and set aside in so far they permit the recovery against the petitioners. Respective consumers is free to recover from the society in accordance with law. Petitions are partly allowed. No costs. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE gas/wp8997.10