1 wp79.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 79 OF 2011 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. V.D. Salunke, Advocate for the petitioners. 1. Lower Appellate Court has found the apprehension about the respondent-defendant is creating third party interest, misconceived and unsubstantiated. I am not inclined to interfere in the Writ Petition because if any cause of action in this respect arises, the petitioner- plaintiff can always move appropriate application. The petition is, therefore, rejected. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE. 10.01.2011 gas/wp79.11