1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.955/2008 (Vikram Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : March 10, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.J.S.Choudhary, for the petitioners. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the police investigation diary. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the injury on the skull has been assigned to co-accused Khangara Ram and so far as petitioner No.3 Babu Lal is concerned, he has not been named and no injury has been assigned to him. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, it is alleged that petitioner No.1 Vikram Singh was armed with iron chain and petitioner No.2 Chotha Ram with lathi. Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the injury on skull has been assigned to co-accused Khangara Ram, without commenting on 2 the merit of the case, taking into account the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I consider it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners Vikram Singh s/o Bhagchand, Chotha Ram s/o Dhanna Ram and Babulal s/o Teja Ram be released on bail in FIR No.11/2008, P.S. Sanchore, Distt. Jalore provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-