IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU W.P.No.9745 OF 2011 Date:13-04-2011 Between:- G.Mesak .. Petitioner And The Inspector General, Special Sector, Central Reserve Police Force, Raipur, Chattisgarh and another. .. Respondents ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed to issue a writ of Mandamus directing respondent No.1 to set aside the order dated 31.01.2007 passed in Appeal No.R-Thirteen-1/2007-S-3 and consequently, to set aside the punishment, which was awarded to bring down two increments and not to pay 51 days’ salary from 17.03.2006 to 06.05.2006. 2. The case of the petitioner is that on 25.05.1994, he was selected as Constable/Driver Force at Hyderabad and trained at Pallipuram, Kerala State. After completion of the training, he was posted at 48th Battalion, Jammu and Kashmir. Later, he was transferred to Ijwal, state of Mizoram, Group Centre and then, transferred to Srinagar and posted to Group Centre Neemuch, Madhya Pradesh. Again, he was posted to Group Centre, Bilaspur. Later, he was posted to 32nd Battalion Sambalpur, Orissa and again, posted to Manipur. Since 04.05.2010, he is working under the present unit. From 16.01.2006 to 16.03.2006, he was on leave for a period of 60 days. Before completion of 60 days, he applied for extension of the leave on 01.03.2006 for 51 days from 17.03.2006 to 06.05.2006 on the ground of ill health of his mother, but it was not sanctioned. A departmental enquiry was ordered and a punishment was awarded. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed an Appeal before the appellate Authority- Police Assistant Commissionerate, Central Reserve Police Force, Raipur, Chattisgad and the appellate authority, by order, dated 31.01.2007, passed in Appeal No.R-Thirteen-1/2007-S.3, dismissed the appeal. So the petitioner preferred a Revision before the respondents through proper channel on 03.03.2011 under Rule 29 of the C.R.P.F. Rules and the same is pending before respondent No.1. Hence, the writ petition. 3. Heard both sides. 4. Admittedly, against the order, which is impugned in this writ petition, a revision is filed before the appropriate authority-respondent No.1 and the appropriate authority has to take an appropriate decision. The petitioner cannot be permitted to prosecute two parallel proceedings in respect of the same order. 5. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.1 to pass appropriate orders on the revision petition filed by the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. _​_____________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU 13th April, 2011 AMD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU W.P.No.9745 OF 2011 Date:13-04-2011 AMD