IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Contempt Petition No. 169 of 2007 1. Shashank Kadyan S/o Sri Raj Pal Singh. 2. Km. Urvashi D/o Sri Raj Pal Singh, Both R/o House No. 60/1, New Nehru Nagar, Roorkee, District Haridwar, Uttarakhand. …Petitioners Vs. 1. Anand Vardhan, District Magistrate, Haridwar. 2. Ravi Nath Raman, Joint Magistrate, Roorkee, Haridwar. 3. Shahid Ali, Tehsildar Roorkee, District Haridwar. ..Respondents Sri Ajay Veer Pundir, learned counsel for the petitioners. Sri K.P. Upadhaya, Learned Additional Chief standing counsel for the respondents. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Heard. By means of this contempt petition, learned counsel for the petitioners has prayed to punish the respondents for flouting the order dated 12-7-2007 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 715 of 2007 (M/S) Shashank and another Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others. On 27-9-2007, this Court has passed an order that:- “Heard Sri Ajay Veer Pundir, learned counsel for the petitioner. Urgency application is allowed. According to the petitioner, despite of service, the order has not been complied with till today. Respondent No. 3 i.e. Shahid Ali, Tehsildar Roorkee, District Haridw3ar is directed either to comply the court’s order dated 12/7/2007 within a period of four weeks, if the order is not complied with within four weeks , the respondent No. 3 is directed to remain present in person before this court on 29/10/2007. List the case on 29/10/2007. If the order is complied with before the date fixed, the respondent No. 3 need not to appear before this Court. Registry is directed that the order be communicated to the respondent no. 3 by Fax. Urgency application is disposed of accordingly.” Short counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent No.3 i.e. Shahid Ali Tehsildar, Roorkee, District Haridwar, Uttarakhand and is also present in the Court today. Learned Additional Chief standing counsel for the respondents made a statement at bar that the order had been complied with. The compliance order has been filed by the respondent along with counter affidavit. The contempt petition is dismissed. Notices are herby discharged. Personal appearance of the respondent No.3 is exempted. All application stands disposed of accordingly. (B.S.Verma,J) Dated: -29-10-2007 M.K.