1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7858 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.7858 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.7858 OF 2005 Sujayeendra Tirtha - Peethadhikari of Shri Raghavendra Swami Mutt, Mantralayam, since deceased through his legal representative Shri Sushamendra Tirtha ...Petitioner Versus Shri Guruji Laxminarayan Holla since deceased by heirs, and ors. ...Respondents Shri P.K.Dhakephalkar, Senior Counsel with Shri.J.S.Reddy for the petitioner. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 16th JANUARY, 2006. DATE : 16th JANUARY, 2006. DATE : 16th JANUARY, 2006. P.C. 1. Heard Shri Dhakephalkar for the petitioner. Perused the impugned order and the decree, which was passed by consent in the year, 1976. In my view, no case is made out for interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with the finding of the Executing Court that the decree is barred by limitation and cannot be enforced merely because the same was engrossed in April, 2003. Petition dismissed. 2 (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)