IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 19TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 2851 of 2011(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- STEPHENA FRANCIS, AGED 19 YEARS D/O.LATE JOSEPH FRANCIS, KOIPPALLY HOUSE VATTAPPALLY PO, CHANGANCHERRY. BY ADV. SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR SMT.A.SALINI LAL RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, S.P.OFFICE KOTTAYAM. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CIRCLE INSPECTOR'S OFFICE,VATTAPPALLY. CHANGANASSERY 686 101. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE POLICE STATION, VATTAPPALLY, CHANGANASSERY 686 101 4. MATHEW JOHN, KOIPPALLY HOUSE MARKET ROAD, CHANGANASSERY 686 101 . 5. SUNIL JOHN, KOIPPALLY HOUSE MARKET ROAD, CHANGANASSERY 686 101 . 6. MOHAN THOMAS, KOIPPALLY HOUSE MARKET ROAD, CHANGANASSERY 686 101 . 7. GIJAN THOMAS, KOIPPALLY HOUSE KAVALA , CHANGANASSERY 686 101 . 8. BOBAN THOMAS, KOIPPALLY HOUSE PERUMITHURUTHY PO, IDINJILLAM,THIRUVALLA- 689 111. 9. SAJAN THOMAS, KOIPPALLY HOUSE KAVALA, CHANGANASSERY 686 101. 10. DUKE JOHN, KOIPPALLY HOUSE MARKET ROAD, CHANGANASSERY 686 101. 11. THOMAS JOHN, KOIPPALLY HOUSE MARKET ROAD, CHANGANASSERY 686 101. GOVT.PLEADER, SMT.CHARISHMA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.S.NO.474/08 SUB JUDGES COURT, KOTTAYAM. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION TO 1ST AND 3RD RESPONDENT. //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. -------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.2851 OF 2011 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~~~~~ Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. Service complete. The petitioner states that she has certain rights on the basis of certain documents including bequest. We do not go into those issues at all, since any such issue has to be resolved through the competent courts of civil jurisdiction or alternate jurisdiction. All that is necessary is that the petitioner's life should be provided adequate protection. Accordingly, we direct that if there is any complaint about any threat to the life of the petitioner that will be taken care of and the police officers will bestow prompt attention. The 1st respondent will bestow personal attention to the complaint, more particularly, because the petitioner appears to be a 19 year old lady. All other issues left open. (THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) (P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE) ps