'fc. : ,i(, .$- p» Si^' C^ l^o IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition fS)NO. {'^~-L^ 12007 PETITIONER ^/Y^- oyv.^y. ••fy' .^^^ /•' <<u>-' DHANAU RAIVIDRITLAHRE ~K»^~ aged about 33 years, S/o Shri Kartik Ram, R/o Village Kareli, P.0. Navagoan (Purda), Distt.-Durg ( C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS -< ^\^.^ :1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Panchayat & Village Development Department, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Ministrial Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief Exective Officer District Panchayal Durg (C.G.) 3. Collector, Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA H1GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B^^ION'BLE MR. SATISHK. AGNIHOTRI,A ['ION (S.) N0 1228 of 2007. Petitioner Dhanau Ram Dhritlafare. versus State ofChhattisgarii & Rreseat : Sfari D.R.Sfaanna, Senior Advocate with Ku. Anita Singh Advocate for 'the petitioner Shri Satisfa Gupta, Deputy Government Advocate for the respondents /State. ORDER (Passed on ln ofMareh, 2007) 1. The petitioner was working as Shiksha Karmi Grade III in Primary School Silli, Dhamdha who has been promoted to ftie post of Sbiksha Karmi Grade II, aad on promotioa, he has been transferred and posted to Pre-Middle School Bhimatola, Dauodi Lohara, in the same District. 2. ff 'er on promotion, on th.e husband and wife be The petitioner bas impugned as per the policy ofthe at one place, as far as possible. 3. I have gone through tiie policy and the records appended to the petition. It is clear, that firstly, tfais is not a case oftransfer simplicitor. It is a case of promotion aad fhe petitioner has besn posted on promotion to -i .::- . s i, •^ - '-°. .'V <t^ ••-» -2- different school. Iftfae petitioner is aot willing to join at the new place of transter, he may forego his promotion. For that the petitioner is not ready. So far as posting ofhusband and wife at one place is concemed, it is applicable in normal transfer cases and that too, as far as possible. The same is not mandatory. It is to be decided in public iaterest by tfae employer. 4- For the reasoas slated herejnabove. the Detition is devoid of merit which deserves to be and is dismissed, summarily. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit '•^A fi^ <[' ll .•"*• f^ * ^jA, •• •' • i •is.^.-i.;- —