C482 No.874/10 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Mr. SK Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Milind Raj, Adv. for the respondents. Learned counsel for both the parties have fairly admitted before the court that the respondent no.2-Km. Sheetal is living with the petitioner-Akhilesh. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that even in view of this admitted fact that respondent no.2 is residing with her, the court below has awarded maintenance against him in respect of her. Hence learned counsel for the parties agreed that the impugned order may be modified and the petition may be disposed of. In view of the above-said agreement in between the parties, the instant C482 petition is disposed of with the direction that the impugned order dated 31.5.2010 passed by the trial court thereby awarding the maintenance in respect of respondent no.2 is set aside. However, the rest of the order passed by the trial court is made affirmed. (D.V., J.) 27.10.2010 Rajeev Dang