1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 7. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.273/2007 In WP/6739/2006 (Uma Pandurang Mantri Vs. Premkumar Shriram Jaiswal) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.N.V.Gaware, Adv., for the appellant. Mr. D.V.Tele, AGP for the respondent. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:12-3-2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr. N.V.Gaware, Counsel for the petitioner. 2. The unfortunate part, salary dues of the petitioner are dragged under fractured reasons which, indeed, are further rectified/united. In the light of the affidavit in reply from Premkumar Shriram Jaiswal, particularly paragraph no.3(e), the Department is bound to adhere to the assurance/undertaking given. Consequently, since 2 petitioner is satisfied, the contempt petition is disposed of. Needless to add, the brunt suffered by the petitioner should not be multiplied by the Department. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/273-07cp