@Q \@ S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITIONS) Naw /2010. PETITIONERS: 1. Vidhyadhar Yadav, son of Dhoblal Yadav, aged about 32 years, working as Cook, Govt. Schedule Tribe Girls Hostel, Tahsil Baramkela, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. , 2. Dhanurjay Sahu, son of Fhakir, ’G :00: ge about Govt 27 Schedule years, working Tribe Boys as \4" Aashram, Dhouradarra TahSII so Baramkela, Dlstrlct Ralgarh Chhattisgarh. / 3. Devnarayan Ajgalle, son of Lethram, aged about 28 years, working as Cook, Govt. Pre Matric ST/SC Girls Hostel, Lendra, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. Versus Respondents r, 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. / 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. /4. Collector, Tribal Welfare Department l) Raigarh D1str1c Chhattisgarh. / \ A WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE N CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WW 200 emm (Wu) WWW mm§wm %e1'1%mm SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITI KER DIWAKER 27. 19‘201Q Shn‘ C.J.K.Ra0, counsel for t e petitioner Smt. Smita Ghai, PL. for the tats, Grievance of the petitioners in the present petition are that despite the direction issued by th .resp, No.2, the resp. No.3 is not complying the said order and the p titioners have not been given their jommg. Counsel for the petitioners s1 bmits that at this stage, he may be permitted to withdraw this petitio but direction may be issued to respondent No.3 to comply the orde of respondent N02. This Court is not the execu passed by the resp. N02. it is howe to act in accordance with law and to take appropriate steps. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, 'ng Court in respect of the orders ver, expected from the respondents