1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4889 OF 2009 1) Jijaba Atyaba Dhumal and Anr. -PETITIONERS VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra & Ors. -RESPONDENTS ***** Mr.SK Shinde, Advocate for Petitioners; Mrs.AV Gondhalekar,AGP for Resp.Nos. 1 to 3; Mr.ST Shelke, Advocate for Resp.No.4. ----- CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE : 6th November, 2009. PER COURT : . Heard. 2) In the light of the order passed by us in Writ Petition No.5965/2008 dated 2nd December, 2008, the Regional Deputy Director of Sugar, Ahmednagar passed a reasoned order on the complaints of the petitioners regarding excessive expenditure on certain items of tender work allotted to some persons in relation to work of Bagas belling and other five ancillary work items 2 of Respondent No.4-sugar factory 3) We have perused the impugned order. We find that deciding the issue raised by the petitioners would amount to entertaining the matter involving disputed questions of fact, which cannot be gone into in exercise of writ jurisdiction of this Court. The petitioner raises grievances as regards allotment of work for the year 2007-2008. 4) In view of the order passed by the authorities concerned and the facts of the present case, we do not find any merit in the petition, it is accordingly dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) (NARESH H. PATIL) JUDGE JUDGE bdv/wp4889.09