1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Contempt Petition No. 31/2007 (Archana Vasantrao Deshmukh VERSUS Liladhar Kadam & 3 others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Kiran Malokar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.B. Patil, counsel for the R-1. Shri A.D. Sonak, Assistant Government Pleader for the R-4. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : MARCH 17, 2009. The contempt petition has been filed to initiate action against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court on 13.12.2006 in Writ Petition NO.4940/2006 directing the respondents to implement the order passed by the Grievance Committee on 27.04.2006. It is the case of the petitioner that in spite of the order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court on 13.12.2006, the respondents had failed to furnish the salary bills to the petitioner to the Education Officer till the filing of the contempt 2 petition. It is also submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the review petition seeking a review of the order of the Grievance Committee dated 27.04.2006 was also dismissed and there was no hurdle in the way of the respondents to submit the salary bills of the petitioner to the Education Department in view of the order dated 13.12.2006 in Writ Petition No.4940/2006. This Court had issued notices to the respondent nos.2 and 3 by an order dated 01.03.2007. It appears that after issuance of the notices on 01.03.2007, the Management and the Headmaster had submitted the salary bills of the petitioner to the Education Officer and the Education Officer has also sanctioned the same. Shri Sonak, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of respondent no.4, states that the bills submitted by the Headmaster are sanctioned and a cheque for the 3 arrears of salary has also been received by the Education Officer, yesterday i.e. on 16.03.2009. Shri Sonak, the learned Assistant Government Pleader states that the amount would be paid to the petitioner within a period of one week. In view of the aforesaid statement, it appears that the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court on 13.12.2006 in Writ Petition No.4940/2006 has been complied with. Since the order dated 13.12.2006 has been complied with, it is necessary to drop the contempt proceedings against the respondents. The contempt proceedings against the respondents are hereby dropped. The notice dated 23.01.2009 stands discharged. The contempt petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE APTE