1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No.337 of 2007 In Writ Petition No.2255 of 2007 (Decided) (Pradip s/o Bhagwan Rathod and others v. The Hon'ble Minister of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection and others) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for Appellant. Shri S.J. Jichkar, AGP for R- 1 to 5. Shri S.V. Ingole, Advocate for R- 6. CORAM : K.J. Rohee & R.C. Chavan, JJ. DATE : 10th December, 2007 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By coming to the conclusion that respondent No.6 committed irregularities, the State Government allowed the revision application by respondent No.6 by imposing fine of Rs. 10,000/- on respondent No.6 and directing him to deposit the costs of six litres of kerosene. He was also warned to abide by the rules in future and in case of his failure to do so, the permit of kerosene shall stand cancelled. The learned Single Judge found that this punishment was proper and, therefore, rightly dismissed the petition. We are unable to see that the appellants can make any grievance about the impugned order. 2 The Letters Patent Appeal is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE pdl