1 7 wp.908.09.sxw ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 908 OF 2009 Udhav Keshav Joshi. ... PETITIONER Vs. The Chief Secretary, State of Maharashtra and ors. ... RESPONDENTS -------- Mr. S.N. Chandrachood for Petitioner. Mr. V.S. Gokhale, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. -------- CORAM : D.D. SINHA and A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 22 nd February, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. 2 This Writ Petition was directed against the order dated 04 th February, 2008 passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, whereby the original application filed by the Petitioner came to be dismissed. 3 Considered the contentions canvassed by the respective parties and perused the impugned order. Perusal of the impugned order shows that on the earlier occasion, the Petitioner had approached the Tribunal by filing Original Application wherein the Petitioner has 2 7 wp.908.09.sxw suppressed the material facts and therefore, the Tribunal in paragraph No.11 of the impugned order has specifically observed that the Original Application filed by the Petitioner was liable to be dismissed on this sole ground. Even otherwise, there is no case on merit and the findings recorded by the Tribunal in this regard are just and proper and are sustainable in law. In the circumstances, no case is made out for showing our indulgence. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. [ D.D. SINHA, J ] [ A.A. SAYED, J ]