1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.3888/2008 [The Deputy Conservator and another .vrs. Sheikh Mohammad Haji s/o Abdul Latif] ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. M.P. Badar, Advocate for the petitioners, Mr. Asif Rizwy, Advocate for the respondent. .......... CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 25, 2009. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondent. 2. Respondent filed the complaint before the Labour Court claiming that he was wrongfully retrenched from service even though he had completed 240 days. The complaint was allowed and the petitioners were directed to reinstate him. That order has been challenged by the petitioners in Revision Application (ULP) No.26/2004. 2 That revision application is yet to be decided. It appears that on an application under Section 30(2) of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971 filed by the respondent, Industrial Court passed the impugned order dated 17.11.2007 and directed to give 'top priority' to the petitioners while recruiting the candidates for the post of Surveyor till the filing of the revision. Unfortunately the revision application filed in the year 2004 is still pending. The learned counsel for the petitioners makes a statement that appointment orders have already been issued on the basis of the selection based on the earlier advertisement. 3. After some discussion at bar with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the present petition stands disposed with the following directions : The Industrial Court shall hear and dispose of the Revision Application (ULP) No.26/2004 within six weeks after appearance of the parties. The parties shall appear before the Industrial Court on 12.3.2009. Till decision of the 3 revision, the impugned order dated 17.11.2007 shall remain stayed. However, the respondent shall be at liberty to file an application for the post of Surveyor and in that case it shall be considered on its own merit as per law. 4. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Gulande