IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36582 of 2010 1.RANJIT SINGH @ BHAGLU SINGH 2.Guddu Singh 3. Kamta Singh 4. Kedar Singh Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 28.1.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners no.1 and 2 are alleged for committing rape upon the complainant while petitioners no.3 and 4 are alleged for abuse in name of her caste. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the parties coming from same village are at inimical term. Title Suit No.144 of 1993 filed on behalf of fathers of petitioners no.3 and 4 and grand father of petitioners no.1 and 2 is pending. Petitioners no.3 and 4 are full brothers and 1 and 2 are cousin. It is stressed that all the family members are involved by making different allegations otherwise commitment of rape by cousins supported by their fathers is not probable specifically in the circumstances parties were on inimical term. This is second incident when false case is lodged earlier also, complainant’s father-in-law has filed Complaint Case no.439C/09 making all the family 2 members including lady members accused which also is pending. Lastly it is submitted that no case is made out under the section 3(x)( xii) of SC/ST (prevention of Atrocities )Act. Taking the discussed points into consideration let the aforesaid petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No.439//09 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Bikramganj,Rohtas,Subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. Anilkr.sinha ( Mandhata Singh,J.)