c ^' 6( IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION NO.t7S»OF 2004 PETITIQNERS: v A^' '..^"^ ^^.•••^.^ .^^1'^' ^:y^"' '^ •••""" ^ou Ku. Nisha Shrivas, D/0 Shri Basant Lal Shrivas, Aged about 28 years, R/0 Railway Colony, Baradwar, Tehsil Sakti, District Janjgir - Champa (Chhattisgarh). Awanish Tiwari, S/0 Shri Dinesh Tiwari, Aged about 31 years, R/0 Baradwar, Tehsil Sakti, District Janjgir - Champa (Chhattisgarh). Versus RESPONDENTS : .T'-::?^ y^. ^ ^:^< ,fet^ (1;^ .^/ 1. ^ 2. 3. 5 ^ State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Department of Urban Development and Administration, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Building, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). Nagar Panchayat Naya Baradwar, Through its Chief Municipal Officer, District Janjgir - Champa (Chhattisgarh). The Collector, Janjgir - Champa, District Janjgir - Champa (C.G.). 4. Ku. Bharti Pandey, D/0 R.G. Pandey, R/0 Naya Baradwar, Tehsil Sakti, District Janjgir - Champa (Chhattisgarh). 5. Ramsaran Yadav, S/0 Vishnu Ram Yadav, R/0 Baradwar, Tehsil Sakti, District Janjgir - Chanipa (Chhattisgarh). ^F a^'^ff^ .^/ 6. Tiket Ram Suryavanshi, S/0 Guha Ram, R/0 Village Bhagodih, Tehsil Sakti, District Janjgir - Champa (Chhattisgarh). ^ [^ WRIT PE nnON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227^0F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^i-^~ -a^.NOo'y Di3CeGfcor> yanehayatt . ' etev®rm»enfc-of Shhafctis^ar'fti RMPITP^ (C<©,)^ XI-HC-78 ^Tpi^ra^HT^ \d-c'T| '-qi^lcXI, tP-al^-I^Ko, RrtWy^ L^-p.^Aa- \J-5'S> O' w^^ 3TI^^T<I5TR-li<h ^?T3TT^$T3?Ht<^ ,/ ^H. 3TT^?T ^f^SS (^gd^) B^TT^R ^ri%^T 3TT^$T 9.9.2005 Petitioner by Shri Respondents No. 1 Panel lawyer. Respondent No.2 Respondent No.4 Heard, Leamed counsel W.P.No. 538/2001, ffled] vide order dated ll.l^ appeal/revision beforc petition was peratitted tj Thereafter, fhe rcvision fhe Director, Paxichay^ (Annexure P/l) passed 04, fhe Director, entertam tiie revisionl jurisdiction. The ijiipugniag fhe order 25.10.1999 passed by 39/A 89 (15)/98-99 In fhe earUer under chanenge. The order also. Panch^yat petlti^ner dajted (An^i( pet^tion tpi^fo^^ ^s^c^Y'^fe^'^f^-ep^ ^^lf^TW^^T $aineer Behar, Advocate. L|, 3 and 7 by Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Ijy Shri Sanjay K. Agarwal, Advocate. l|y Shri ShaUesh Ahuja, Advocate. |for fhe petitioner subiaits fhat in by fhe present petitioner, this Court .2003 granted liberty to file proper |fhe Director, Panchayats and fhe be wifhdrawn with the said liberty. ^yas preferred by tihe petitioner beforc kt but vide oider dated 28.5.2004 |in Revision Case No. 41/A 89/2003- 4yat, Chhattisgarh, Raipur decUned to on fhe ground fhat he had no has filed fhe present petltion 28.5.2004 as also the order dated |fhe Collector, Janjgir in Appeal No. itiexureP/2). the oider dated 25.10.1999 was )resent petition chatlenges fhe same r— 'l^ XI-HC-78 *11*101^*IT^ vd-iyci <-qiqic<)«,U>Ti1'(1+l<»,Rrtl^-i^ u3.f.\^- ^"?-r3/^ (ffi , 3TT^^T^TRVli4> ^H3n^$T4?*li<b 3IT^$T q^^('jc|ijc|<ri) ^200 B;^TTW?^Tfi?T3TT^^T — ^-— 4>i<<[o4lri WRCTt'^'i^St <<Ri^-c;ix ^3Tf^TOT^5T Leamed counsel Jfor fhe petitioner subniite that a direction may be issuedjto ftie conceraed authorily namely Direetor/Coniinissioner, Urbaa Admiuiistration aad Developxnent, State o|T Chhatdsgarh to decide fhe revision/appeal agaiast fl|ie order dated 25,10.1999 passed by fhe CoUector, Janjgir. Learaed coiinsel fo^ fhe respondents have no objection to the aforesaid Unuted J)rayer niade by leamed counsel for fhe petitioner. Having heard leara^d counsel for the pardes aiid haviag regard to fhe facts aad iaterest of justice, fhe 99 wifhia a period of| Dircctor/ Coianiissioner, inents, ia accordance wit circuiastaaces of fhe case, in fhe petitioner is permitted to file a revision/appeal chaUen^iag fhe order dated 25,10.1999 passed by the CoUector J^tajgir in Appeal No. 39/A 89(15)/98- 15 days from today before fhe Urbaa Admiaistrative and Development, State of Ctpiattisgarh. The said aufhority shall decide the revision/app^al prcferred by fhe petitioner on law, withia a period of six weeks froia fhe date of its |presentation, wifhout raisiag aay technical objection. Ifthe revision/app^al is filed, fhe raatter m.ay be taken up for hearing on 27th Sehpteinber, 2005, when atl fhe parties will reinaui present. g XI-HC-78 *11*ICTia»^T^ ^t^-^i<tic)<<,^THti«i<£,Rirtm|pl^ oD.^.'Mb^. n-S3/o- 3I1iitf1CRiq?^'||cti^^ -wpia OT^^T^PTf^m? craT3Tr^$Ta^TW -^s^^ u §^ltWr^Rd 3Tlt$T T-\ ^ s !^ l^ ^ The petidoner will| on aU fhe paijdes, weU ia | The inferun order shaU contmue for a Wifh the above stands disposed of fiinaUy] Certified copy, as [serye a copy of fhe jrevision/appeal ladvance, not later thaa 25.9.2005. jgranted on 3.8.20041ia this petition srio^l ofeightweeks from jfcoday. obs|ervations aod directkms fhis petitton pjer Rules* <Pl<l[c5*FtytW^f ^f f^^^N^I^ ^ari^Tgn^st Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge