^ :i'iyi;i.L!' Bfc'Nu.i,' ^ y IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) N0.'2-'2^ly/2011. PETITIONER: Haribansh Bhoi, son of Dhobha Bhoi, aged about 61 years, working as Head Master, Govt. Primary Sehoal Lankapali, Block Pussour, Dista-ict Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. versus Respondents -^^ O^S^ ^^/ •3<s~ ^-'' ^-1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. District Education Officer, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. y 3. Joint Director, Treasury and Accounts, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. WRITPETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INDIA ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRn' PETITION fS) No. 2264 of201 1 'ETITIONER RESPONDENTS Haribansh Bhoi. State ofChhattisgat-h &0fliers. WRIT PEnTION UNDER ARTIC'LE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA Present: Shri C.J.K.Rao. Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the Stat&'respondents. 3. (Passed on 29th day ofApril, 2011) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on mstructioi'is, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw tiiis petition with liberty to make a representation in the liglit of circular dated 05.01.2011 issued bv the Govemment of ClAattisgarh, School Education Department. Leamed couasel appearing for othei" side has no objection. No permission ofthis Court is required to make representation to the respondent authorities. Thus, such direction caruiot be issued. However, ifthe petitioners make a representation to the respondent autfiorities, the same mav be considered and decided ia aecordance with law, on its own merits.and perspective. With the aforesaid observation- the v/nt petition is dismissed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit .a.sS'