: 1 : SD IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.1899 OF 1983 NO.1899 OF 1983 NO.1899 OF 1983 Sita M. Bhatia ...Plaintiff V/s. Bombay Hsg. & Area Development . Board & Ors. ...Defendants Ms.Prachi Mhatre i/b. Bodhanwalla & Co. for the Plaintiff. Ms.Madhubala Kajale, AGP, for the Defendants. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATE DATE DATE : 17TH FEBRUARY, 2009. : 17TH FEBRUARY, 2009. : 17TH FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The Plaintiff’s Advocate sought time to seek discharge. This request clearly indicates that the Plaintiff is not giving instructions to the Plaintiff’s Advocate. I am now told that the Plaintiff is not traceable. She is not residing at the place where she used to reside earlier. In such situation, there is no possibility of Plaintiff coming to the court or the court giving notice to the Plaintiff to attend the case. The Plaintiff in all probability has lost interest in the matter. 2. Hence the Suit stands dismissed for default. : 2 : [A.V. [A.V. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] NIRGUDE, J.] NIRGUDE, J.]