IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11590 of 2010 SHYAM MANDAL, SON OF LATE MONFI MANDAL @ SONFI MANDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-HARRI, POLICE STATION-SURSAND, DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. …………………………………………………..PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Shailendra Kumar, A.P.P. -------- 2. 30.4.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the F.I.R. was lodged against one known and 15-16 unknown persons. The petitioner is not named in the First Information Report, however, his name has come during the course of investigation only upon suspicion as some of the witnesses have stated that the petitioner was seen moving in the village on a motorcycle alongwith one Ganesh Sah, two days prior to the alleged occurrence. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of - 2 - the case, the petitioner, Shyam Mandal, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Parihar P.S. Case No.112 of 2008, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, after his release in this case, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in criminal cases of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)