IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8570 of 1988 with SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8580 of 1988 with SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3044 of 1989 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.M.PANCHAL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? @ BANCOALUMINIUM LTD Versus CHIMANBHAI B RAJPUT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 8570 of 1988 MR KM PATEL for Petitioner No. 1 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 1 MR MR MENGDEY, AGP for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE J.M.PANCHAL Date of decision: 03/09/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT During the course of hearing of the petitions, the learned counsel for the common petitioner has produced copies of 2(P) Settlements arrived at between the petitioner and its workmen, under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, on December 3, 1999, for perusal of the Court. The copies of the two Settlements are ordered to be taken on record of the three petitions. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the above-referred to two Settlements, the petitions do not survive and be disposed of accordingly. Accordingly, rule is discharged in each petition with no order as to costs. Each petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to move the Court in case of difficulty. (J.M.Panchal,J.) (patel)