1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3629 OF 2010 (Subhash R. Magar & Ors. vs. Avdhut G. Chikte & Ors) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. AUGUST 27, 2010. Heard Shri Mehadia, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Mohta, learned counsel for respondents No. 1 & 2. Shri Mehadia, learned counsel has tried to raise some substantial contentions, however, Shri Mohta, learned counsel has pointed out that the order assailed in MCA is an ex parte order passed below Exh. 5 by the trial Court and the appellate Court has itself issued directions to the trial Court to decide that Exh. 5 finally expeditiously. He states that the petitioners have been taking adjournments thereafter. Without going into the merits of the controversy, I find it appropriate to permit the trial Court to consider the contentions being raised by Shri Mehadia. Writ Petition is, therefore, not entertained. The trial Court is expected to decide the application at Exh. 5 as early as possible and in any case within one month from the date of communication of this order to it. 2 Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.