IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Arbitration Case No.92 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision.27.07.2011 2. Arbitration Case No.93 of 2011 M/s BNB Construction through its Proprietor Mr. R.K. Goel, House No.104/51, Silver Oak, DLF Phase-I, Gurgaon, Haryana ......Petitioner Versus Ajay Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Nikhil Handu, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks for permission to withdraw the petitions. 2. As ordered, the petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner shall be entitled to seek for exclusion of time taken before this Court in his bona fide of prosecution and if such an application is moved under Section 14 before the competent Court, it shall be left to the Court to consider that in the light of the circumstances given and take appropriate decision on the same. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 27, 2011 Pankaj*