IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 11TH JULY 2011 / 20TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 18630 of 2011(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. P.RAJAMMA, W/O.SEBASTIAN, AGED 70, MATHA GARDENS, THEKKEKUNNAM, KOTTEKKAD, PALAKKAD, PIN-678 732. 2. S.LISSY, D/O.SEBASTIAN, AGED 45, MATHA GARDENS, THEKKENKUNAM, KOTTEKKAD, PALAKKAD, PIN-678 732. BY ADV. SRI.ALEX THANNIPPILLY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM, PIN-695 001. 2. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, FOREST HEAD QUARTERS, TRIVANDRUM, PIN-695 001. 3. THE CUSTODIAN (ECOLOGICALLY FRAGILE LAND) AND CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, FOREST HEAD QUARTERS, TRIVANDRUM, PIN-695 001. 4. THE CONSERVATOR AND CUSTODIAN OF FOREST, PALAKKAD FOREST DIVISION, OLAVAKODE, PALAKKAD, PIN-678 002. 5. THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, WALAYAR FOREST RANGE, PALAKKAD, PIN-678 002. 6. THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, FLYING SQUARD DIVISION, PALAKKAD, PIN-678 002. GP SRI.P.M.PAULOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 18630 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 19.2.98 IN M.F.A. NO.814/1988 AND M.F.A.654/1988 EXT.P2- A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE SUPREME COURT IN SLP (CIVIL) NO.C.C.7383-7384/98 DATED 23.11.98 EXT.P3- A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 12.3.03 ADDRESSED TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT EXT.P4- A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 6.6.05 ADDRESSED TO THE SECOND RESPONDENT EXT.P5- A TRUE COPY OF THE ENQUIRY REPORT DATED 11.3.04 OF THE 6TH RESPONDENT EXT.P6- A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 9.2.10 ADDRESSED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P7- A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 10.2.10 ADDRESSED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT (True Copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).18630/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 11th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT The only prayer sought in this writ petition is a direction to require the second respondent to consider Exts.P6 and P7 applications made by the petitioners. Having regard to the case of the petitioners regarding the pendency of the aforesaid applications, without expressing anything on the merits, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider Exts.P6 and P7 applications and pass orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four months of production of a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs