IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR M.C.C. No. <^^ /boil ivteson Beneh Applicants Aooellants .**** w ^ Non-applicants: RESPONDENTS 1. CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD (NOW CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER HOLDING COMPOANY LTD.) THROUGH ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NAGRI, TAHSIL NAGRI, DISTMCT DHAMTARI (C.G.). 2. CHIEF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND DIVISIONAL ELECTMCAL INSPECTOR, C.S.E.B. DHAMTARI, DISTRICT DHAMTAM (C.G.) VERSUS 1. KUMARI ROHINI D/0 LATE MAHESH KUMAR, AGED ABOPUT 11 YEARS, 2. ROHIT KUMAR S/0 LATE MAHESH KUMAR, AGEDABOUT 13 YEARS, 3. SMT. LALTA @ LALITA BAI, W/0 LATE MAHESH KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, CASTE - GOND. ^<^ 4. RESPONDENT N0. 1 & 2 BEING MINOR REPRESENTED BY RESPONDENT N0. 3 (MOTHER) ALL RESIDING AT VILLAGB DEWGAON, POST DUGLI, TAHSIL NAGRI, DISTRICT DHAMTARI (C.G.) STATB OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH COLLECTOR, DHAMTARI, DISTRICT DHAMTARI (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF FIRST APPEAL N0. 78/20Tl DISMISSED VIDE ORDER DATED 19.07.20llBY THIS HON'BLE CQURT The applicants named above most respectfully beg to submit as under:- ^i /y^!\ f/ ^ 'i I Is^gi 1 S '%S^:;^ 1 '^.. O) HEQH COURT GF CKHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Divisioii Beaeh Hosi'ble Shfi £.M. Qiaddlisi & Hoa?Ne Sjari G. Miaaaiiiddia. JJ. M.C.C. N0. 414 OF 2011 APPL2CANTS/ APPELLANTS HGN-APPLICAKTS/ RESPONDENTS Clilialtisgaili Staie ElecLiicity Board artd another. Versus Kuiuaii Rohnii aiid olliers. APPLSCATION FOR RSSTGRATJGN OF FIRST APPEAL N0. 78/2011 Presesst: Shri Kshitij Sharoia, courisel tbr flie applicauts, Shii Vuiay Harit, Deputy Advocate Geueral for the Statc. GRAL GRDBR (Passed oa 23th day ofjuly, 2011| Per SJvl. Qliddlisi, J. Heard on I.A. No.Ol, for exeiaptioii froiu tlluig copy of order dated 19-07-2011. 2, On due coiisideration, tlie application is atlowed aiid tljie applicaiits ai-e exempted froiii litiiig tlie copy of order dated 19- 07-2011. 3. Hcsuxi oa M.C.C. 4. The applicaiits have filed Uiis applicatiori for restoration ofF.A. No. 78/2011 as tlie saiue has been dlsiuissed forwaiit of prosecution vide OAxler dated 19-07-2011. 5, For tlie reasons statecl iii tlie applicatiou for restoration, we aie of tlie^ opinlou tliat the cause shown is satisfactoiy aad tlierefore, Uie order dated 19-07-2011, dismissMig F.A. No.78/2011 for waiit of prosecutioii is re-called, F.A. No. 78/2011 is restored to its origuial number. 'r^.. ^^K:. ® Evr 6. Leai-ned cotuisel for tiie appellaiit submlts fliat flie execution of tiie decree lias been fixed on 29-07-2011. Therefore, llst the F.A. No.78/2011 on 28-07-2011. (. Certlfied copy as per rules. Sd/- LM.Quddusi Judge Sd/- G. Minhajuddin Judge