IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27398 of 2011 1. Ajay Kumar Singh, S/o Raj Dev Prasad Singh, R/o Vill.-Mahajamma, P.S.-Mahua,Dist.-Vaishali. Versus 1. The State of Bihar with Criminal Miscellaneous No.27447 of 2011 1. Dhananjay Kumar Gupta, S/o Sri Raj Kishore Sah, R/o Vill.-Akhta, P.S.-Bairgania,Dist.-Sitamarhi. Versus 1. The State of Bihar Through C.B.I. with Criminal Miscellaneous No.28044 of 2011 1. Arun Kumar S/o Hari Nandan Rai R/o Vill. Etwarpur, P.S. Lalganj, Distt. Vaishali Versus 1. The Central Bureau of Investigation Through The Joint Director. -------------- 02. 24.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, State and the C.B.I. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 120B, 419, 420, 464, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the CBI vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that in the facts of the case petitioners are involved in social crime they should not be released on bail. Considering that the petitioners are in custody since 16/18.05.2010 and charge-sheet has already been submitted in their regard, let the petitioners, above named be released on bail after full verification of the petitioners and bailors identity on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Special Judicial Magistrate, CBI (SDJM) Patna in connection 2 with RC 219 2011 E 0004 [04(E)2011] subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be local since the petitioners belong to Vaishali/Sitamarhi and the other bailor shall be father of the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)