THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.27982 of 2009 DATE:22.12.2009 Between: Perika Janakiramulu ... Petitioner and The Superintendent of Police, Mahabubnagar District and others ... Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.27982 of 2009 ORDER: According to the petitioner, he is the absolute owner and posessor of an agricultural land admeasuring Ac.13.37 guntas in Sy.No.209 of Ramachandrapuram village, Mahabubnagar District. When the unofficial respondents herein are trying to interfere with his possession of the land, he filed a suit in O.S.No.99 of 2009 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar, against them, for permanent injunction. He also filed an application seeking temporary injunction in I.A.No.343 of 2009 along with the suit and the court below granted adinterim injunction, by an order dated 29.04.2009. Despite the order of adinterim injunction, as the unofficial respondents are interfering with his possession, he filed another I.A.410 of 2009 before the very same court seeking police protection and the court was pleased to order the said application and directed the official respondents to provide protection, by its order dated 05.10.2009. In spite of the said order, providing police protection, as the official respondents are not implementing the said order and are not providing protection, he approached this Court and filed the present Writ Petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home. 3. When once there is an order providing police protection and the same is brought to the notice of the official respondents, the official respondents are duty bound to implement the said order and provide police protection. This Court in Satyanarayana Tiwari Vs. S.H.O. P.S. Santhoshnagar, Hyderabad [1] held: “It is impossible to envisage a situation where the High Court has confirmed the injunction order of the trial court is powerless to enforce its orders and be a silent spectator to its being violated with impunity and leave the parties to seek their remedy by way of contempt alone. By any interpretation of the provisions of Civil P.C, the power of the High Court under Art.226 of the Constitution, to enforce its own orders or the orders of the Civil court cannot be curtailed. The power which a civil Court has under Section 151 CPC the High Court has in much larger measure under Article 226 of the Constitution. The High Court therefore has ample jurisdiction to issue a writ or direction to all the authorities including the police within the State to enforce the orders of the civil court as confirmed by the High Court and maintain the rule of law. The police authorities in the instant case are bound to give all assistance to the appellant to enforce and see that the injunction order is implemented and any enquiry or report of any other authority, revenue or police cannot be put as an excuse for not rendering the required help to the appellant to maintain his possession.” 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed and the official respondents are hereby directed to implement the order passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar, in I.A.No.410 of 2009 in I.A.No.343 of 2009 in O.S.No.99 of 2009 dated 05.10.2009 and provide police protection to the petitioner. No order as to costs. _____________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J 22nd December, 2009 CBS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.27982 of 2009 (Allowed) 22nd December, 2009 CBS [1] AIR 1982 A.P., Page 394