PEWTEONER RE$§ONBEN¥S Hi :A‘s a a H €0URT 9F CHHAW ARH: EiLASPuR Writ ?e$§‘ii$n (3) NO. 5§2 c?" 231% #‘r J Bhus'nan Singh Raiput aaed about 47 n ‘ wears, i a. S7o‘ Shri "Amoi Sing'n majpu-L‘ R/c. Chhate Atarmuda, TV. "Fower, “1 from of CSEB, Sui} Mien, Raigarh, Disirict Raigam {CG} Versus 1) “iate of Chhamsgar‘n, throua'r *‘ne Smretary} Panchayat DeDaFtmént. m v a. a nchaw‘asz Rabur (CG), 4, ’ \ The (x Vanecmr, n & Raigam, District Raigarh (CG) 3} Ziia Panchayai Ra§garh through the Chief Executive Offmer. Raigarh, Distr‘ict Ra‘igarh (CG). 4) damped Panchayai Raigar'n ihrough the Chief Executive QiFicer Raigam, Dietiict Raigarh {CG}. 5) Chief Execuiive Officer, Janpad Pan nayai, Raigarh, Dieirict D‘aigarh (CG). 5‘; General Administraiion Committee. ‘ thmugh ibe Chairman, Janpad :Damheyat Raégarh: District Raigar’ri (CG). 7‘; t. Laxmi Patei. President pad Panchayai, Raigam: u: tRaigarh §CG)i 8} Ram Kumar Agrawai‘ Vice President. Janpad Parichayat, Raigarhi Districta Raigarh (CG) e) ‘x/ijaya Mishra: Reereeeniaiive of he Honibie Member of Legisiaiive Aeeembiy cf State cf Chhaitiegam in Janpad Panchayat Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG). {Writ Petitien under Ariicie 226 of the Constitution of indie} 33: Honibie Mr. Saiish K. i—tgnihai‘ri, J. ?resent: Shri Praieek Sharma, counsei for ihe petitioner Shri satieh Gupta Govt Advocate forihe respendenis No.1 to SlState. ‘1}? ‘i. @REER fagsed 9:1. 28"“ Janaatyi gims) Laamed counsei appeafing far the Statefrespondenis No. 1 to 5 submits that There is no enquéw pending against the petitioner. Hawever, the petiimner has been askedto submit the dccuments orothermformation byt'ne Enquiry Committee which is enquiring into the aiiegations cf irreguiariiies in the consimciion of iviiii Water Shed‘ Kurunjkhoi? iock ghargheda Dsii‘ Raigar‘n (CG) There is no reasen why the petiiioner sheuid mi extend aii the assistance and provide aii the required documents fer the purpose Qt enquiry as abeve stated. 2) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and wiiiing to suppiy aii the information and documents to the concerned officer as nominated/appointed by the Chief Executtve Officer, Ziia Panchayat, Raigarh, 3) In View of foregoing, nothing sun/ives in the matter. Acoordingiy, the r petttion is disposed of. Consequently, iiAiNot aiso stands disposed ot. %W a Raiu Sd/— t . Satish K.Agnihotri‘ 3 Judge si x “‘i