* 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2026 OF 2010 Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Mumbai .... Appellant V/S. M/s. Aafloat Textiles (I) Ltd. ..... Respondent * * * * Mr. Vimal Gupta, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondent. CORAM :- J.P. DEVADHAR, & SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. 17 June, 2011. P.C. :- 1. Heard. 2. On perusal of the order of ITAT which is impugned in this Appeal, it is seen that the Tribunal has merely affirmed the order of the CIT(A), wherein the CIT(A) had directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the issue in accordance with the provisions of Section 43A after necessary verification of facts. The decision of the Tribunal is not on merits, but merely confirms the remand order of CIT(A). In this view of the matter, we are not inclined to entertain the Appeal. The Appeal is dismissed. [SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J] [J.P. DEVADHAR, J]