1 1177.11-ao IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1177 OF 2011 Vinod Amarnath Mhatre. ... Appellant. V/s. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and another. ... Respondents. A.A.Pande for the appellant. Ms.K.K.Soran for respondent No.1. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATED : 20th October 2011. P.C. : The counsel appearing for the respondent- Corporation, on instruction from Mr.Sopan Nivrutti Talole, Sr.Inspector (Licence), `A’ Ward, makes a statement that the Deputy Municipal Commissioner (Special) will extend an opportunity of hearing to the appellant as well as other respondents in respect of erection of the hoardings and will decide the issue regarding the distance between two hoardings and retainability of the hoardings, within eight weeks from today. Counsel for the respondent- Corporation also makes a statement that till the adjudication is made as regards the issue involved in the matter at the hands of the Deputy Municipal Commissioner, no adverse action will 2 1177.11-ao taken against the appellant and, in case, the decision is adverse to the appellant, the same shall not be implemented for a period of two weeks thereafter so as to enable the appellant to take appropriate measures. In view of this, learned counsel for the appellant states that he will instruct his client to withdraw suit. 2. With the aforesaid directions, appeal from order stands disposed of. In view of disposal of appeal from order, pending civil application does not survive and stands disposed of. (R.M.BORDE, J.)