1 CA 39/10 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2010 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 189 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. Niranjan Mogre i/b Mr. S.M. Gorwadkar for the applicant. Mr. Rajesh Mirchandani i/b Paras Kuhad & Associates for the respondents. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 19TH JANUARY 2011 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The revision application has been dismissed against respondent nos. 5, 8, 9 and 10 by reason of a conditional order dated 13th November 2009. This civil application has been made for setting aside that order and permitting the applicants to take steps for 2 CA 39/10 service on them. When asked about the reason why the steps were not taken in pursuance of the conditional order dated 13th November 2009, learned counsel for the applicant says that respondent nos. 5, 8, 9 and 10 are not the contesting parties and hence are not necessary parties. If so, there is no need for setting aside the order of dismissal against them. Hence, the civil application is dismissed. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)