WPSS 551 OF 2007 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri Vinay Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Paresh Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel State of Uttarakhand for the respondents. Learned counsel for both the parties have submitted that the controversy raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 04.03.2006 passed by Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No. 66 of 2005 (State of Uttarakhand and others Vs. Pushkar Bhatt and others), as such, the present writ petition may be disposed of on the same terms and conditions of the aforesaid judgment. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is finally disposed of on the same terms and conditions of judgment and order dated 04.03.2006 passed by Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No. 66 of 2005 (State of Uttarakhand and others Vs. Pushkar Bhatt and others). Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. All the pending applications stand disposed of. (M.M.G., J.) 18.05.2007 VKS