IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 1ST NOVEMBER 2010 / 10TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 29286 of 2010(I) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- INFANT JESUS CHURCH, REP.BY ITS PARISH PRIEST REV.FR. JACOB BAIJU BEN, ERNAKULAM-682 031. BY ADV. SRI.K.L.JOSEPH, SMT.P.SAREENA GEORGE. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KSEB, ELECTRICAL MAJOR SECTION, CENTRAL, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-18. 2. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KSEB, ELECTRICAL SECTION, CENTRAL KOCHI-18. 3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KSEB, ELECTRICAL MAJOR SECTION, CENTRAL ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-18. 4. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, KANAYANNOOR TALUK, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-16. R1 TO R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B. R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/11/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P(C)No.29286 of 2010 ---------------------------------------- Dated 1st November, 2010 JUDGMENT This writ petition has been filed challenging Exts.P4, P5 and P9. In fact, the petitioner is aggrieved by the action on the part of the respondents in resorting to revenue recovery proceedings ignoring the fact that the consumer had earlier requested to dismantle the service during October, 2001 after remitting the dues outstanding as on that date. When this matter is taken up today, the learned standing counsel made available a copy of letter from the third respondent to the fourth respondent bearing NO.EDE/AB/Rev./RR/2010-11/1071 dated 25.9.2010. It would reveal that already the third respondent had requested the fourth respondent to withdraw the revenue recovery action initiated against Consumer No.2643 i.e., against the petitioner. This is recorded and accordingly, this writ petition is closed. C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS