1 S.B.Cr.Misc. IInd Bail App. No.778/2008 (Peppa Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : February 20, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.J.V.S.Deora, for the petitioner. Mr.J.P.S.Choudhary, Public Prosecutor. This is second bail application. While dismissing the earlier bail application, the petitioner was granted liberty to file a fresh bail application after the statement of Bheraram is recorded by the trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record the statement of the witnesses so far recorded including the statement of PW.1 Bheraram. PW.1 Bheraram did not support the prosecution case and turned hostile, so as the case of other witnesses viz. Smt. Doli and and Nanda Ram. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the prosecution witnesses did not support the prosecution case, I consider it just and proper to enlarge the 2 accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Peppa Ram s/o Parath Mogiya be released on bail in FIR No.149/2007, P.S. Sayra, Distt. Udaipur provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-