Petiiiona; Pmmtiff Respomient (Wr 8y ihis petmon; the pei‘moner impugns the iegaém/ and varidity of the Order o’a’reo‘ 2-8-20i3‘?‘ passed by Labour Court in Case No.3iLDAot/2005' (Reference). 2‘; The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner was appoinieo on da§iy wage basis n Mumcipai Corporatien, Korea. The Labour Court, withoui considering an “me evia‘ences, Ciaiiy wager a working. ;i’ wasofur‘rher heio‘ that the petitioner faiied to produce any documen: be heid ‘Ehai Trikoc‘nan Praead Rai‘hore and Trééccdnan Prasad Nai are one and the same. 3) i have whereby it can heard éeameo‘ counsei apeearing for the petirmner; pemsee‘ 'me preao’inge aoci documents apoendeo‘ thereto. 4) ' Nai. m view of mat no reiief was granted to the p'e‘im‘oner /\\ WGH €{3IIRT OF CHHA‘WISGARH: $1LA$§U¥€ Wri% Ramon gL‘z No. 3233 oi“ 21308 Trééochan Prasao’ Naif Slo‘ EShri Mano‘naf (maSar), rasitigné Dhcijhépara, Nsar C'nhaitisgarh Staie Vidut Manda? Ccfcmy, Ksrba: Pcsi: and Dés‘m Kama (CG). Vaisus Municipai Carporation, Korba, through Commissioner, Municipat Corporation Kama, Tehsii and Disii Kama {CG}. Lai, aged abcut 32 years; by Caste Nai “a— ii Petition under Amc$e 226L227 of ihe Comsti’tutéem of mafia} SB: gen’me Mn 8ai§sh K. nfxgnihniig J. ORAL 0R9Ei§ @assad an 2'5“ gay «My; 29m) has wme m the condusion mat me pe‘tiiioner was never working as na‘ some other person nameiy Tré§0chan Prasad Rathere was me Labour sour; after havmg exammed air the evio‘encee and documents produced before it, has-come to the oonoiueion that Tniochan Praeao Rattiore was a person who was working in Munioipai Corporation, Korba, not Triioc‘nano‘ Praeao’ 5) ii :s a pure questlcn cf T“ ” mmrig of ‘Fac': on groper apprecéatéor? 02" evkzience This: Court; m exercige of ifs sextrasrcimary jurisdiczicn uncéer Articie 226/227 u Camsii‘tu‘tion sf mdia has iimited scope to interfere Couxi The High Cour’: can interfera (mi or exce$5 of juritsdiction, refusas is exermse juriscfictmm E§ror face of records, arbitraiy or é§scrimEnaiiorx, Tiagrant error in orocedure ano‘ recoromg of‘me the preoeni case: i have not found t‘r‘ invoked to seek interferencs o§ ihio Court. 6‘) Thus} i‘na petition is devoid of mem’ ano és accoe‘a‘mgiy dé3m§ssed. wi': , :‘ha fmcimgs 0f mg Labour 5y in cases of errcneaus assumptiom cf ‘acis of faw awarem an m’ capr'écicw exercise of powers sf the au‘m pervefse findér’rgs. i .ai any of the ground siatec; above has oeen Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge