IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2330 of 2011 BHARAT SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --------- 02/ 08.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Piprahi P.S. Case no. 98 of 2010 registered under sections 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act. Allegedly, 10 kg ganja was recovered from the conscious possession of petitioner. Submission of the learned counsel for petitioner is that seized ganja was not produced before the learned Sessions Judge and as a matter of fact, nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of petitioner. I am not in agreement with the above stated submission and accordingly, this bail petition is hereby rejected. However, the learned Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi/ Trial court is directed to conclude the trial of petitioner within nine months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within the above stated period, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before the learned Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi/ Trial court itself. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)