IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No. 11163 of 2006 RAMSNEHI PRASAD SINGH, son of Late Thakur Jagdish Prasad Singh, resident of Mohalla – Miscot Len No. 6, Ramna, P.S.-Mithanpura, District- Muzaffarpur …………………. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through the Secretary, Department of Industry, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. The Secretary, Industry Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The Director, Industry, Government of Bihar, Patna ………………….. Respondents ----------- 03. 28.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the State. Prayer of the petitioner is for quashing of part of the order of Director of Industry, contained in Memo No. 564, dated 03.03.2003, whereby he has been shown as absorbed on the post of Correspondence Clerk in stead of the post of Project Manager, though he was working on this post from 28.02.1994. Further prayer of the petitioner is for all consequential benefits in case of absorption on the post of Project Manager. A detailed Counter Affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State, wherein it has been stated that the petitioner’s case was considered by the Screening Committee and it was found that the 2 promotion, which was given to the petitioner with effect from 01.19.1996 to the post of Project Manager was against the present procedure. The Screening Committee thus recommended for absorption of the petitioner to the post of Correspondence Clerk on the District Industries Centre. The Screening Committee has considered the case of the petitioner as per the Bihar Industries Service Cadre Rule, 1987. The relevant rule has been quoted in para 14 of the Counter Affidavit. Considering the statement made in the Counter Affidavit, I find that the petitioner has no case and payment has rightly been absorbed on the post for which he has eligibility as per the Rule. With the aforesaid observations, this application is disposed of. SKM (Mridula Mishra, J.)