IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL (LODGING) NO.324 OF 2009 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.86 OF 2008 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.388 OF 2008 Rajendra Nemichand Kothari ... Appellant Versus Surendra Bohra ... Respondent Mr. S.U. Kamdar i/by Ms. Sunanda Kumbhat for the appellant. Mr. Paritosh Jaiswal i/by M/s. A. Purohit & Co. for the respondent. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 17TH JULY, 2009 P.C. Delay condoned. Notice. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent accepts notice and waives service. We have heard the parties and the appeal is finally disposed of on their consent. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the order dated 1st April, 2009 does not impound the document but at this stage it only requires production of original document and the question has been kept open by the learned Trial Judge. The parties would be bound by this statement before the trial court. In view of this statement which is accepted, appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.