^- ^. •?gi, 5 j3@RP| IN THE HIOH COURT OT CHH&TTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) M.A. No.3^ APPELLANT HOJSt- APPLICANT Ne.l ^: Abdul Rashid Siddiqae S/o Gtilam Miyan,aged aboat 60 years oceupatioa - Business, Fesideat of JarahagaEh Ward.P.S. & Tabsil Arabikapar, Bistt. Surguja (C.G.). V e r s u s RESPOBBENTS APPLICANT NQ.I ^ APPLICAHT Ne.2 s>>1 5 ,2 • JU'PLICANT M©^3 ^'.3. ' ^ ^T' .^y' ^yr' <•^- ^s ..-• 'y NON APPLICANT No.2c-4. y N®NAPPLICANT NQ. 3^55. ~ J Janeshwar shukla S/e Permaaaad Shukla, aged aboat 53 years. Raa Uday Sliakla S/o Jane sbwar Shukla, aged abottt 28 years. Sanjay Kamar Shukla S/o uTa.ne shwar Shakla, aged about 26 years. All are resident oS village J'aifiwantpur, Sata. & P.S. Ramanaj ©anj,Tahsil Pal, Present address Raxaanajganj Road, Kali Mandir, Shalitear Ghat, Ambikapur, P •S. & Tah,, Ambikapur Distt.surguja (CO) Raradeai s/o Mallaram Harijaa, oeeupatioa Briver, aged about 3S years, resident of viliage Gerawa, P.S. Meral, Distt.Gbrlwa! Bibar naw Jharkhand. ; The Oriental Insaranae Co.Ltd. Bran@h Ofifiee, Sadar Road, Anaba-kapur, P.S. & Tah. Ambikapar, Bigtt. Surguja (c.G.) ....eoatd.... • % 2 - APPE&L UNBER SECTION 173(1) OF THE tKTOR VEHIGLE AGT 1988 - --^— - —-^- ^ _1—. —^^an-fl—fl •— C,.,»^ rtlt- 1 ii BBBB XI-HC-22 'aI^I^I tW* sfSsi gitiHi'^fiCT f ;; 7q'=:qFn?R, ^€tWTS, fafiwy _..M.-A,..3M/.!ZJ":'^. TS7. t4r On a inenti.on beins hearing, SIiriA.N.Pandey, counselfo|r ShriA.K. Prasad, couziselfijr The appellant has preferred| of the Motor Vehicles Act beinb 7.7.2003 passed by ftie leamed| Tribuiial, Ambikapur whereby flie the order on fhe application filed^ Vehicles Act, directing fhe appeU4nt, to pay Rs.50,000/- towards no 140 of th.e Motor Vehicles Act. I have heard fh.e learaed Learaed counsel for fhe / has been directed to pay the Com.uaav ought to have been diret I have perused fh.e impui speci&catly Bientioned that fhe without aav valid licence in b) Insurance PoUcy aad accordiiigly,| no fault Itabili'ty amount ofRs.50,1 Leanied counsel for the relevaat time, fhe driver was haviilj find aay substauce ia the argiim^nts ina4e, the inatter is taken up fhe appeU£m.t, respondents 1 to 3. tbis appeal under Section 173(1) aggrieved by the order dated 2nd Additional Accident Claims leamed Tribiin.al has passed under Sectioa 140 of the Motor (nt, who is the owner of the Bus, Fault liabilitk' in tenus of Section ^prf^^-f ^l^? ^ ^^ ^i^ti ^aiPwTsn^f ^ A coUnsel ap^eUaa wlfeole for fhe pa«.taes.c"-/; :|eUaat submits that fhe appeUant Ijiole amoiuit, wliereas Insurance :ted to pay tlie amoiuT.t; :tied order ia. which. it has been Driver was driving the vehicle t'each of fhe conditious of fiie directed fhe appeUant to pay the poo/-. [appeBaat subnilts fhat at the ig fhe vaUd Iicence. But, I; don't of tlie leamed coiinsel of tlie -i- XI-HC-22 "s^';:IIPII?PT, 0T!iwi6, Tsicii'yy SII^I^T ,K;-)i?b 311^1 1^1Hiqi yf^a 311^1'TOIIW:'(rfTO C2-5 appeuant because neimer me] learaed Tribiinal nor auy poin^ ofthe conditions offhe Insurad in rhe unpugued order, hence aud fhe same is disiaissed. c?»i*il<rt<i1i HWW ^ fe^ <^1-^R ^ 3ii^[3II^I Ucence was subiuitted. befdre The was raised fhat fhei'e is ^i' breach 2e PoUcv. In view of the .above, I d(|)n't fiiid an.y fflegality or irregularih" PIC appeal is liable to be disnussed Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge