WP 6281 of 10 1 SSK/17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6281 OF 2010 Hanmant Dattu Waingade ....Petitioner Versus Smt. Krushnabai Bapu Patil & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Rahul P. Walvekar, Advocate for the Petitioner. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 12th AUGUST, 2010. P.C.: Heard Mr. Walvekar, learned Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. By the impugned order, the Additional Commissioner, Pune, Division - Pune held Respondents revision is maintainable under section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. 3. The Petitioner contends that the said revision was filed challenging the order dated 29th March, 2008 after a lapse of a period of 14 months. He further contends that the Respondents have also not filed any application for condonation of delay and therefore, the Additional Commissioner was WP 6281 of 10 2 SSK/17 not justified in holding that the Respondents’ revision is maintainable. In my view, the Petition can conveniently be disposed of, by passing the following order: 1. The Petitioner is at liberty to raise point of limitation at the time of final hearing of the revision. 2. In the event, the Petitioner raises objections regarding maintainability of revision on the ground of limitation, the Additional Commissioner shall decide the same on merits in accordance with law. (R. V. MORE, J.)