IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.102 of 2007 LALITA KUMARI @ LALITA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 6.5.08 Heard Mr. Dudh Nath Singh for the petitioner, and Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, learned Standing Counsel No.22. This application has been filed by the petitioner of C.W.J.C.No. 13222 of 2005, for recall of the order dated 10.4.2007, whereby the writ petition was dismissed, and for a fresh hearing and decision. We have heard learned counsel for the parties at length and given full opportunity to the learned counsel for the petitioner to establish his case as if the writ petition was being heard a- fresh. It appears to me that the scheme for appointment of Anganbari Sevika, inter alia, provides that the person belonging to the majority community should be preferred. It appears from Annexure D to the counter affidavit of respondent no.7 of the writ petition that the petitioner belongs to Dhobi caste and 35 persons of that caste reside in the Panchayat. On the other hand, the successful candidate belongs to Bhagat caste and 650 persons of that caste reside in that Panchayat. For this reason and the other reasons assigned in 2 the order dated 10.4.2007, no case for recall of the order is made out. This application is accordingly dismissed. ( S. K. Katriar, J.) Vinay/