IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20646 of 2011 Nanhak Yadav @ Nanka Yadav, S/O-Bharat Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03 18.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named in the first information report and in course of investigation, the grand daughter of the informant and one Mamta Devi claimed to have identified the petitioner committing the alleged crime. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner was well-known to the informant and his other family members prior to the alleged occurrence and, as a matter of fact, petitioner had asked the informant as to why he had not given proper share to his elder son and that is the reason of false implication of the petitioner in the present case. It is also contended by him that petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 59 of 2009. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)