IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3826 of 2006 MADAN THAKUR Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 02/ 04.05.2010 Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sinha for the petitioner and Mr. Vijayeshwar Prasad for the Employees Provident Fund Organization are present. The petitioner who superannuated from the services of M/s Bata India Limited, Bata Ganj, Digha, Patna, has raised grievance of less payment of pension by the respondent authorities under the provisions of the Employees Pension Scheme, 1995 by mis- application of the provisions. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and in which it has been stated that the grievance of the petitioner was considered and it was found that the fixation of pension at Rs. 810/- was in accordance with the provisions of the Scheme and did not require any interference. Having regard to the submissions made in the counter affidavit, nothing survives in the writ petition and is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner, is so aggrieved, to raise his claim before the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner together with calculative details and who shall consider and dispose of the same by a speaking order within a period of three months of receipt of any such representation. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)