1 upa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.1132 OF 2005 SUMMARY SUIT NO.1132 OF 2005 SUMMARY SUIT NO.1132 OF 2005 Canara Bank ).. Plaintiff Versus Ramesh Chandra R. Mishra and another ).. Defendants Mr.K.R. Lalchandani for the Plaintiff. None present for the Defendants. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 13TH MARCH 2006 DATED : 13TH MARCH 2006 DATED : 13TH MARCH 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Defendants have not accepted the packets containing the writ of summonses. The postal authority remarks show "unclaimed". An affidavit to that effect has been filed by the Plaintiff. 2. The Suit has been filed claiming an amount of Rs.1,44,849/- together with interest on the principal amount @ 16.25% per annum. This claim has been made by the Plaintiff on the basis of demand promissory note. The demand promissory note has been produced on record. There is no defence to the claim made by the Plaintiff. 3. In view of this, the Suit is decreed as prayed for. 4. Refund as per Rules.