1 ao 1284-2010group.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1284 OF 2010 Mr.A.R. Constructions ..Appellant vs. Gokul Vishnu Jagtap & Anr. ..Respondents WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1285 OF 2010 Mr.A.R. Constructions ..Appellant vs. Narendra Bikaji Patade & Anr. ..Respondents WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1287 OF 2010 Mr.A.R. Constructions ..Appellant vs. Vijay Vishnu Jagtap & Anr. ..Respondents Mr.A.R. Pande for the Appellant. Mrs.Vaishali R. Bhilare for Respondent No.1. Mr.P.G. Lad for Respondent No.2. Mrs.K.K. Soran for BMC. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J DATED : FEBRUARY 1, 2011. P.C. : 1. The learned Counsel for the appellant 2 ao 1284-2010group.sxw submits that the appellant would be satisfied if the learned trial court is directed to decide the suits itself, expeditiously. 2 In that view of the matter, the appeals are disposed of with a direction to the learned trial court to decide the suits, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six months from today. 3 In view of the disposal of the appeals, nothing survives in the connected civil applications. The same are also disposed of. (B.R. GAVAI, J)