MC 3456/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Since the 1st petitioner Smti Pratima Bora expired on 31.8.2014, her legal heirs have filed this application under Order 22 Rule 3 of the CPC for their substitu tion. The 2nd petitioner in the case is Ranjan Kumar Bora, who is the son of the deceased and therefore he is already represented in the present proceeding. I have heard Ms. T. Goswami, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. NM Du tta, the learned counsel for the respondents. Considering the statements made in the substitution application and after hearin g the learned counsel, Menakshi Bora, Mrinalini Bora Bhuyan & Aparajita Bora Haz arika are permitted to be substituted as the legal heir of their mother (petitio ner No.1). The son of the deceased is already participating as petitioner No.2 a nd therefore his name need not be specifically incorporated as a legal heir of t he 1st petitioner. It is ordered accordingly. With the above order, the Misc. Case is disposed of.