IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5132 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 08.09.2009 Rameshwar Dass and another .....Petitioners versus Satish Kumar .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Harkesh Manuja, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner-landlords are aggrieved at the order dated 24.7.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, impleading the respondent as legal representative of the deceased-tenant (Narain Dass). Though the petitioners do not dispute that the respondent is son of the deceased-tenant, yet they claim that in the facts and circumstances of the present case, the tenancy is not inheritable by the respondent. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners, I do not find any merit in this revision petition. The respondent has been mere C.R. No.5132 of 2009 (O&M) 2 impleaded as a party to the eviction proceedings instituted against his deceased father. The question, as to whether the respondent is entitled to continue as a statutory tenant or not, can be raised by the petitioners at an appropriate stage of the case which will be considered by the Rent Controller in accordance with law. With these observations, the revision petition stands dismissed. 08-09-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE