WPMS 228/2011 Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J. (Urgency Application No. 624/2011, Interim Relief Appl. 672/2011) Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Upadhyaya, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. BD Upadhyaya, Counsel for the respondent University. Heard. Learned Counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner could not attend her B.Ed. Classes as she had conceived during that period. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the respondent University stated that the petitioner was found short of minimum required attendance as prescribed under Rule 1-22 of the Kumoan University & Other Affiliated Colleges Admission Rules and, therefore, cannot be allowed to appear in the examination. The exemption of 5 per cent in the minimum prescribed attendance could be granted by the Principal of the concerned college and above that, exemption up to 10 per cent could be granted by the Vice Chancellor of the University. Hence, petitioner is not entitled to any relief. As regards the contention of learned Counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner may be allowed to continue her studies in the next session, for that the petitioner may make a representation before the authority concerned, if she so desires. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is dismissed. Urgency application and interim relief application also stand disposed of accordingly. (Nirmal Yadav, J.) Vacation Judge 3.2.2011 Prabodh