IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36689 of 2008 BINOD SINGH, Son of Late Tapeshwar Singh, resident of Village Tatehpur, P.S. Barun, District Aurangabad --------Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.11.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barun P.S. Case No.151 of 2007 for the alleged offences registered under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation in the complaint is to the effect that right from the time of marriage, the members of the in-law’s family of the complainant had demanded Rs.40,000/-. The learned counsel firstly submitted that the allegations are vague. Secondly, it is submitted that as a matter of fact, father of the informant had obtained the signatures of the petitioner on some non-judicial papers and used it for execution of the sale deed, which was got executed in favour of the daughter of the informant i.e., the wife of the petitioner. However, later on the same was being challenged in a civil suit vide Title Suit No.327 of 2007 (Annexure 3). The learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender 2 in connection with Barun P.S. Case No.151 of 2007 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)