IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18772 of 2010 MD.SADRE ALAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR & NAR ----------- 9 6.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Torture for demand of dowry is the allegation is denied showing the conduct of the complainant that after reconciliation she agreed to accompany the husband but left him after coming out of the Court and filed another Complaint Case. Maintainability of another case is not in question here. Act of the parties is relevant, in this regard order passed in Matrimonial Case no. 236/09 dated 14.9.2010 is refereed by filing its certified copy on behalf complainant that the case was fixed for reconciliation. Both the parties were present in Court but petitioner’s act in the way forcing the Court to make some observation that after remaining present in case he did not respond and did not appear in Chamber while specific instruction was given to him in Court goes against the petitioner for refusal of anticipatory bail. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)