IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.55 OF 2007 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.3116 OF 2006 Pukhraj Premchand Jain. ...Plaintiff. Vs. Dilip Pratapchandji Jain & Anr. ...Defendants. .... Ms.Kavita Shah i/b. A.G. Shah for the Plaintiff. Mr. Thakkar i/b. Thakkar & Co. for the Defendants. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. 9th April 2007. P.C.: The defence of the First Defendant is that the Second Defendant who is the brother-in-law of the Plaintiff and the acceptor of the Bill of Exchange has colluded with the Plaintiff in forging the signature of the First Defendant. It has also been stated that the Second Defendant was an ex-employee of the First Defendant and the entire document Exh.A is in the hand writing of the Second Defendant. The defence shows that there are triable issues. Unconditional leave to defend is accordingly granted. The Summons for Judgment is disposed of. Written Statement to be filed within 8 weeks from today.