{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.24 OF 2008 Gumanchand Kanhayyalal Mutha APPLICANT VERSUS Kadeer Ahmed Khan Mohd Munwar Khan& Ors RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.P.V.Mandlik, Sr.Counsel i/b Mr.Amol Gandhi for applicant Mr.S.S.Kazi, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr.N.R.Shaikh h/f Mr.J.R.Shaikh, Advocate for respondent No.2 ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE : 23rd June 2009 PER COURT: 1. Present civil revision application is filed by the applicant, as the application filed by him dated 21.01.2008 for grant of status quo, was rejected by the Presiding Officer, Wakf Tribunal, Aurangabad in Wakf Suit No.120/2007. After perusal of the application (Exhibit-16), it is clear that the application for temporary injunction is yet to be decided on merits by the Tribunal. After this application came to be filed, interim protection was granted in terms of prayer clause (C), however at the same {2} time it was clarified that the trial court is not precluded from hearing application for interim relief, without getting influenced by the order of this Court. It is informed that the application for temporary injunction filed by the applicant, who is plaintiff before the trial court, is still pending. Considering the date of the order passed by the trial court, the date of the civil revision application filed in this Court and the pendency of the civil revision application in this Court, it is desirable that the civil revision application to be disposed of by giving directions to the trial court to decide the application pending on its file for temporary injunction within a period of 4 weeks from today. The order of interim relief earlier granted to continue till the disposal of the temporary injunction application came to be decided by the Tribunal. With these directions, the civil revision application stands disposed of with no order as to costs. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/cra24-08