`IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA LPA No. 199 of 2011 Decided on 16.6.2011. Ran Dev ……..Appellant vs. High Court of H.P. and anr. ……Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Sh. M.L. Sharma, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice (oral). CMP (M) No. 641 of 2011 This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. The delay is of about 11 months and 14 days. The applicant has not stated any ground explaining the delay. That apart, the applicant has made an attempt to file an appeal against the judgment dated 21.6.2010 in CWP (T) No. 10214 of 2008. The judgment reads as follows:- “ The instant petition has been filed for regularization. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No.1 has regularized the petitioner. In view of this position, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous.” 2. The contention of the applicant is that the learned single Judge has not adverted to his main grievance. If that be so, remedy available to the applicant is not by way of an appeal and thus, the appeal is mis-constructed, as well. Application for condonation of delay is dismissed. 2 LPA No. 199 of 2011 In view of dismissal of application for condonation of delay, the present appeal is also dismissed. However, we make it clear that this judgment shall not stand in the way of the appellant taking recourse to other remedies, if available, under law. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Sharma) Judge. June 16, 2011 (LSP/pankaj)