IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.11859 of 2008 Between: M.Satyanarayana reddy, S/o. Laxman Reddy, R/o. 16-11-741/C/A/47, S.B.H.Colony, Moosaram Bagh, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND The Agriculture Market Committee, Hyderabad Rep by its Secretary cum Person-in-charge, Office at New Osmangunj, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, one more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, a) Declaring the action of the Respondent in not allotting shop/open place to the petitioner and not considering the case for said allotment as bad, illegal, arbitrary land therefore consequentially direct the Respondent to consider the case of the petitioner and allot shop/open place at Gaddiannaram fruit market yard to the petitioner in terms of the applications dt. 19-03-2002 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.USHA KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.V.V.N.NARAYANA RAO The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.11859 of 2008 ORDER: It is the case of the petitioner that he made an application before the respondent on 19-03-2002 for allotment of shop/open space in the Gaddiannaram market yard for the purpose of conducting fruit business by making necessary deposit of Rs.25,000/-. But, the said application has not been considered and disposed of by the respondent. It is further stated that similarly situated persons filed W.P.Nos.6434 of 2003 and batch before this court and the same were disposed of on 31-03-2004 directing the respondent to consider the claims of the existing licencees, among the writ petitioners therein, along with other licence holders, on priority basis, for allotment of shops/open spaces in the proposed constructions. It is further stated that similarly situated persons also filed W.P.No.18029 of 2004 before this court and the same has been disposed of directing the respondent to consider the applications of the petitioners therein for allotment of shops after considering the case of the existing licence holders as per law, if their applications are pending. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider and dispose of the application of the petitioner, dated 19-03-2002, if not already disposed of, for allotment of shop/open space after considering the case of the existing licence holders as per law, as expeditiously as possible, without any undue delay. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 11-06-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{LS}