IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19467 of 2009 RAM BRIKSH MAHTO @ RAMBIRICHHA MAHATO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 4.6.2009 A.Kumar Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under sections 420,467,468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that the petitioner contracted to sell three decimals of land and received entire consideration money for the land but later on the informant came to know that the informant had sold the land to his brother. Submission is that no interpolation was done by the petitioner. It may be done by the Scribe. Considered the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar, Sitamarhi in Complaint case no. C-1/210/07 ( Tr. No. 588/2009). (Shyam Kishore Sharma,J.)