IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 5865 of 2008. Decided on: 27.07.2010 Parvinder Singh and others …Petitioners. -Versus- Himachal Pradesh Nagar Vikas Pradhikaran and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No __________________________________________________________ For the petitioners. : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. C.N. Singh, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : It is jointly represented by the learned counsel for the parties that the case of the petitioner can be considered in view of the principles laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 448 of 2005, titled as H.P. Housing & Urban Development Authority versus Nisha Sharma & Ors., decided on 24th July, 2008 in CWP No. 448/2005. 2. Accordingly, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner, as per the principles laid down in judgment, cited hereinabove, within a period of eight weeks from today, on the production of certified copy of this judgment. The petitioner is held entitled to all the consequential benefits. Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 2. In the light of above, the petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge July 27, 2010 (K. Attri) Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.