IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20931 of 2010 KUMAR SAMBHAV @ CHANDAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 22.09.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail since 01.10.2009 in a case registered under Sections 302/34 of the I.P.C. In the F.I.R., it is alleged that Kishlay Kumar Singh and this petitioner caught hold of the victim when this petitioner pierced dagger on the left side of arm-pit of the victim who subsequently succumbed to the injuries. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in 164 Cr.P.C. statement the informant has not specifically alleged against this petitioner of piercing dagger to the victim, rather he has alleged the assault to the victim by both the petitioner and Kislay Kumar Singh. It is further submitted that petitioner is 70% disabled. Learned counsel for the informant submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner to pierce dagger which is corroborated by the medical evidence. 2 Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present. The application for grant of bail to the petitioner stands rejected in connection with Aurai P.S. Case No. 80 of 2009. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)