THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.No. 4913 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the orders of the learned XIXC Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderbad in I.A.No. 1274 of 2008 in O.S.No. 1940 of 2006, dated 5.9.2008. Brief facts of the revision are that: Petitioner herein is the defendant No.3 before the learned trial Court. For the purpose of convenience, the parties as arrayed before the learned trial Court are referred to hereinafter in this order. Petitioner filed I.A.No. 1274 of 2008 before the learned trial Court for reopening the enquiry/trial. The learned trial Court after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner- defendant No.3 has partly allowed the petition subject to condition of cross examination of P.Ws.1 and 2 on 5.9.2008, failing which the petition stands dismissed. Challenging the said order of the learned trial Court, the present Civil Revision Petition has been preferred. Heard both sides. The order revision reads thus: “However, there is no valid reason mentioned in the affidavit which was filed by the petitioner along with this petition with regard to the necessity of recall of D.W.1. Therefore, this petition is partly allowed to recall P.Ws.1 and 2and so far as recall of D.W.1, petition is dismissed and also subject to cross examination of P.Ws.1 and 2 on 5.9.2008, otherwise this petition is stands dismissed.” From the foregoing discussions, I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the finding of the learned trial Court and it needs no interference. Accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. _______________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J 6.7.2010 CHV