IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 666 of 2006 (M/B) Riyasat S/o Shaukat, R/o Village Ghissupura, P.S. Pathri, Distt. Haridwar ........ Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Senior Superintendent of Police, District Haridwar 2. Station House Officer, P.S.Pathri, District Haridwar. 3. Mohd. Usman S/o Late Rafiq R/o village Dhanpura, P.S. Pathri, District Haridwar ......... Respondents ............. Petitioner’s counsel absent. Sri D. K. Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Petitioner’s counsel absent. Sri D. K. Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 13.07.2006 13.07.2006 A