•}••:. .^./ IN /0&/- THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, AT - BILASPL PETmQNER RESPONDENTS ..^^"'^^ •cr"'T^>1^ WRIT PETmON ^2^J20Q6 RADHADEVI MOHNI AGED-45YEARS W/0 SHRI Dharmu ram sahu Posted as -Mahila Swasthya Karta^ AT -Sub-Centre-Tetemarenga, PHC-Tokapal Tah.-Jagadalpur.Distt. - Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS 1. StateofCG' Through - The Secretary, Department of Health, DKS, Bhawan RAIPUR [CG] 2. Collector, *- Distt. -Bastar [CG] 3. Chief Medical & Health OfRcer l- Jagadalpur,Distt.Bastar[CG] 4. Smt. Jhunki Korram,' Posted as -Mahila Swasthya Karta AT -Sub-Centre-Telemarenga, PHC- Tokgpal,Tah.-Jagadatpur,Distt. - Bastar (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE - 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ ...••"^'-?> ^•b..--'' .C:-"'' - .c^^y>" ^' '^.^ -••*'' '^sS^ •^^ "y^y ^ ^ ^ ^'1 XI-HC-78 qi<<?n sh<ii<sb -T5T •-tiww^, tSi-rfl'M'ie, Riiniuy ^ri^ ..^^P.H^,.. ^ 200^ 3TI^?T ^af) (vI'l(s"i.eT) aii^r ?iT f^iN; traT31I^Tsb*liti WTTWHficrsn^r ttil'iltfl'ifl-f 1|l4<'lTfftec^<RlW;K ^3T|^tT3(1^T iri 14^-2006 Shri Ravish Verma, counsel Shri Satish Gupta, Dep^ty respondents No.1 to 3, on advance] l-1eard. By the instant petition, the order dated 7-7-2006 whereby she| Centre, Bade Marenga, Communit^ Centre, Bhejaripadar, Community The main grievance of the made for adjustment of responden)] petitioner has been transferred irt evident form the transfer list and sjga has been written that same is madel The second ground of chal| not reflect that the same has beert Minister concerned as per the transf Having heard leamed coun^e! petition and documents. During the course of argumf submitted that the petitioner was therefore, she is working at that Moreover, it is not evident from requested particuiarly for her postir(g been posted in order to accommoda|te As far as second ground is| shows that copy of the same forthe petitioner. Govt. Advocate for the State/ |copy. Ipetitioner has ciia!!enged her transfer has been transferred from Sub Heaith Health Centre, Tokapal to Sub Health hjealth Centre, Tokapal. tsstltioner is that the transfer has been No.4 in place of the petitioner and the place of respondent No.4 which is sjgainst the name of respondent No.4 it |on her request. ll]enge is that the impugned order does made after getting approval from the fer scheme for the year 2006-07. in^e! for the parties, ! have perused the i^nts, learned counsel for the petitioner w(srking at the present place since 1990, Iptace for about more than 16 years. ^ny record that respondent No.4 had at the petitioner's place and she has her. lconcerned, perusal of the transfer list been sent to the Chief Minister Has P.T.O. XI-HC-78 ~S:3[ rf<|<(|<rt<<, yTnu'16, Tsjdiyy HI*IWI artrrqi ^ 200 3T1^?T'4a<*i ('i,cl!^s«S<T) 3TT^T qiT ^TOi tRTsn^TgnR; Barve ^^.f ^ y^ ??BTW;ETf5(i'3TI^r concerned, concerned Minister an<|t also to the Director, therefore, it shows getting approval from the concerne|d substance in this writ petition, sar|ie hereby dismissed. Consequentty, M.(W.)P. No.;31262^006 aiso stands disposed of. . - Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge w-ifepftT WRrr ir'te^t T^RSTC ^; srf^iT sn^T Secretary, State of Chhattisgarh, as that same has been done after Minister, as such, 1 do not find any is liabte to be dismissed and it is P.T.O. ^ ^ ^ y