maid. wua: o? CHHA‘g:éi3ARI-i: Bgaspua Wrii ggtgygan (SiVNo.M Patitioner 3mt. Esther Tigga, wffe cf Shrf An“ KumarWgga, aged about 45 years, cccupatien Asst. Teacher; Primary Some! Vikas Khand = Ka Versus Resgondents 1} State of Chhattisgarh thmugh the Secre 2) The Deputy Sachw, Department of What We§fare Dau Kaiyan Singh, Bhawan, Manfralaya Raépur (CG), 3) Ccmmfssioner‘ Deptt. of Tr§bas Wekfare, Pi. Ravéshankar University Premieee, Raipur (CG) 5) The Aeeéstam Commiesioner, Deptt 0f Tribal co). téon Offroer; Brock Kansabei; Department 0f Singh, Bhawan; R 4) CeHector, Déett. Ja Weifare; Jaehpuw 8) The Bfock Educa Distt. Jaehpur (CG). {Writ Petiticn under Amde 225 of the Constitution of indie) SB: Hon’bie Mr. $aiish K. Agnihotrig J. ‘ISFéEeEE ‘ Shri AN. Bhakta, caunselfwthe petftioner. Shri Arun Sac, Sovt. Advacate fcréhe State ORAL OR§ER (Paesed. an 13‘“ day cf Aug With the consent of (earnee counsei appear; heard finaiiy. 1) Learned caunset appearing far the geetiticner submits that te petiiicner does net want ts press this p mien on meme at this stage. However; the petitioner prays that the representaticn dated 1512608 (Annexure W3} authorities may be directed ta be censfdeired and \Mthm the preecz‘ibed time. th cancemed authomy, expeditiously. 3) in View, of the foregoing, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned autheritiee to censfder and decide the re accordance with iaw, on its own merite, as early as possibie, preferabiy within a period - cf iwo weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this (Tribe! Weh‘are) —- Kenadand, nsabel, Distt Jashpur(CG). tary, Tribal Welfare; Deu Karya” aipur (CG). ehpur (CG). net, .2003) ng for the parties, the petirion is pending before the concerned decided, in accordance with iaw, presentation as stated above, in order. tit/3r. Sao iurthersu‘omits 2) Shri Arun $ao, iearhed Govt. Advocate appearing for the State submits that ere is no reason why the pending representation shouid not be decided by the h ,A “(y thaf nc coercive steps shali be taken against the petitioner, tm the dismsaf of the representation. 4) § hcpe and trust that the Skate Government Shah éxamine the representation Government time i0 objectiveiy in accordance with law and guideiines, issueci by the time. 5) in view gf the abcve, IVA.Nc>.1 aieo stands disposed cf, r Sd/— fee m I Rm ‘ i ‘ Satish K.Agnihotri Judge ‘i { , ,N.