THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI Writ Petition No.21235 of 2010 Dated: 02.09.2010 Between: Aslam Bin Ali Jabri, Hyderabad. … Petitioner And Great6er Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep., by its Chief Commissioner, Hyderabad and 3 others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No. 21235 of 2010 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the inaction on the part of the respondents 1 to 3 for removal of the alleged illegal constructions made by the 4th respondent in the public road is arbitrary and illegal. It is stated that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of house bearing No.9-4-86/138, Plot No.138 (P) Ideal Cooperative Housing Society Limited, Salarjung Colony, Hyderabad having purchased the same under a registered sale deed dated 15.03.2010. It is alleged that the 4th respondent who is in possession of the property adjacent to the petitioner’s premises started construction of ground, two upper floors and pent house without obtaining any permission from the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and in total violation of the building rules and zoning regulations. It is also alleged that the 4th respondent had encroached upon the public road and the approved lane leading to the petitioner’s house. In the circumstances, the petitioner made representations dated 04.08.2010, 09.08.2010 and 13.08.2010 before the respondents 1 to 3 requesting to take necessary action for removal of the illegal constructions being made by the 4th respondent. Alleging that the respondents 1 to 3 failed to consider the representations made by the petitioner, the present writ petition has been filed. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 3. As the material available on record shows that the representations made by the petitioner were acknowledged by the office of the respondents 1 to 3, learned standing counsel states that the necessary action would be taken in accordance with law. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to the allegations made by the petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representations dated 04.08.2010, 09.08.2010 and 13.08.2010 made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of hearing to the 4th respondent as well as the petitioner. Such exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. No costs. ​ ______________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 02.09.2010 KLP