IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.474 of 2011 (Arising out of C.W.J.C. No. 1360/1999) Ghanshyam Verma @ Ghanshyam Pd.Verma, Son of Late Binda Prasad, resident of village-Bel Banwa, P.S. Jogapatti, District-West Champaran……………………………………………….Appellant. Versus 1. The State of Bihar . 2. Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Deptt. of Forest and Environment, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Bihar, Patna. 4. Chief Conservator Forest cum-Mild life warden, Bihar, Patna. 5. Chief Conservator of Forest-cum-Managing Director Bihar State Forest Development Corporation, Patliputra Colony, Patna. 6. Conservator of Forest Valmiki Tiger Project, Bettiah-cum-Field Director. 7. Project Director, Champaran Project Circle, Bettiah. 8. Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Deputy Director, Valmiki Tiger Project Division-I, Bettiah. 9. Project Deputy Director, Champaran Forest Division-I, Bettiah………………………………………………..Respondents. ----------- 3. 02.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Bihar State Forest Development Corporation. The writ petition preferred by the appellant was dismissed because the Writ Court found that after a particular date in the year 1999, the appellant had been disengaged and no work was taken from him. Considering the said fact and also poor condition of Bihar Forest Development Corporation, the prayer for regularization of service of the appellant who was working on daily wages for some time was not found acceptable. Before us it was strongly asserted on the earlier date that there are order and materials to show that the stand of the respondents in the counter affidavit and in Annexure-B are false and 2 the appellant worked on daily wages even after 31st March, 1998. On going through the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the appellant, we do not find any order or material which may show the stand of the respondents to be false. In the facts of the case, we find no good reason to interfere with the order of the Writ Court. The appeal is dismissed. The fate of the appellant shall be governed by fate of similarly situated person as per policy decision to be taken by the respondents. Mkc/ (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Shivaji Pandey, J.)