C.Rev. No.65 of 2010. 26.4.2011. Present: Mr.Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General, for the petitioners. Respondent served but not present. Hence proceeded against ex parte. By means of this Review Petition, the petitioner has sought the review of the judgment, dated 6.1.2010, whereby this Court had dismissed the writ petition of the State on the ground that the petitioner had completed more than 240 days in a calendar year prior to 1993. In this Review Petition, it is stated that Gauri Dutt’s case is not applicable to the facts of the present case and this case relates to grant of pension and is covered by the decision of this Court in State of H.P. and others vs. Sarab Dayal, Latest HLJ 2007(HP) 1292. Therefore, the Review Petition is allowed and the judgment, dated 6.1.2010, is recalled. The Review Petition stands disposed of accordingly. CWP No.2037 of 2007: By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 23.8.2007 passed by the learned H.P. State Administrative Tribunal, whereby the learned Tribunal has directed that 50% of the continuous service rendered by the employee on daily rated basis should be taken into account for calculating it as qualifying service for the purpose of entitlement of pension and other retirement benefits. The Tribunal has only followed the judgment of this Court in Sarab Dayal’s case (supra). We, therefore, find no merit in the writ petition which is accordingly dismissed. (Deepak Gupta), Judge. April 26, 2011. (V.K. Ahuja), (tilak) Judge.