IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAD AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No.1038 of 2008 Kshemanand Joshi ……… Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. ……….. Respondents Mr. Bhuwnesh Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent No.4. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Bhuwnesh Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent No.4. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition field by the petitioner, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted that final report against the petitioner before the Circle Officer concerned on 29.12.2008 and the same is likely to be submitted before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 26.12.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 12.02.2009 V.K.