1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.02.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1727 of 2011 S.Karunakaran ... Petitioner Vs. State rep. by The Inspector of Police Pasupathipalayam Police Station Karur District (Crime No.877 of 2010) ... Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondent to complete the investigation and to file a final report in Crime No. 877 of 2010 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Mathiyalagan For Respondent : Mrs.S.Devasena Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondent to complete the investigation and to file a final report in Crime No. 877 of 2010 on the file of the respondent. 2. Heard Mr.R.Mathiyalagan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs.S.Devasena, learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 3. The case of the petitioner is that there was a dispute between Eswaramoorthy and the petitioner. On 27.07.2010 at about 8.00 a.m., the said Eswaramoorthy and his wife waylaid the petitioner and assaulted him and abused him in a filthy language. Immediately, the petitioner gave a complaint before the respondent and on receipt, the respondent issued C.S.R.No. 437 of 2010, dated 27.07.2010, but no action has been taken against the accused. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner sent a representation to the Superintendent of Police, Karur on 18.08.2010, but no action was taken on his complaint. He would further submit that he filed a Petition before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Karur, under https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C., and the same was forwarded to the respondent and thereafter only, the respondent registered a case in Crime No. 877 of 2010 for the offences under Section 120(B), 323, 341 and 506(i) of IPC on 27.8.2010. He would further submit in his argument that after registration of the complaint, the respondent has not taken any action and it is kept pending for six months. He would further submit in his argument that the accused persons threatened the petitioner and his family members to withdraw the complaint. Therefore, he would request the Court that a direction may be issued to the respondent to complete the investigation and to file a final report in Crime No. 877 of 2010 at an earlier point of time. 5. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit in his argument that the case has been registered as per the direction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Karur, and the investigation is being carried on and it will be over soon and the charge sheet will also be filed very soon. 6. Considering the submissions made by both sides, this Court is inclined to record the submissions of learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) and to direct hte respondent police to investigate the case in Crime No. 877 of 2010 as expeditiously as possible and to file a final report, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. With the above said direction, this Petition is disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Inspector of Police Pasupathipalayam Police Station Karur District 2. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai. +1 CC to Mr.R.Mathiyalagan, Advocate (SR.No.8844) CRL.O.P.(MD).No.1727 of 2011 11.02.2011 vsg NSV/25.2.11/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/