sw EwcHr im. B Clw N BLE HIGH COURT OF Ase A I BILAsPUR ' ' RIT PETITIoN s N0OF 20 F T LAL MAITRI 5/0 Ramad Manrl age aouf 5 years Occupatio Range Officerl‘ Pos’red a‘r Range Officer Baloda Fares? Circle Chama Dismc’r anJIr-hama (C VERSUS ' s OF CHIek hrough ‘Seéke‘tary, Deartmenf of orest K S Bavan Manfrala Ral H SERVATOR FS, hha’rfiSgarh, ‘Raiur (C.G.) IVISIAL ORST OFFICR isx‘ric‘r: Janjir-Champa (6.6. I I i ! x gé C) IN THE HO CHHmARH T. ' W 315W 09 AM§I hm -' ‘ d b 7 n ' p JgCp G) iTATE HATTsAH ' T p ' F D h ya pur (C G ) CIEF CON OF ORET C p DON FE E, D g ) WRIT» PETITIOVNVUNDER ARTICLE 226 OF .THE' coNsTITUTION oF INDIA ' Nacnoyma/ H1200 7 mm’éWw) mw‘aw Timmmw www§fs€tm ‘%a’f?mawéw \) SE 2 HQN’ES$E SHRE JU$TE$E ?R31TEKKER DIWAKER 24-.G7‘23Q9 Shri Shr‘i Yashwant Gurudevl Singh Sharan, Thaku‘r, counsel Dy‘ {01‘ AG the gm“ yet £116 homer S‘tate, Challenge in th€ present petition iS to the order ‘dated 30.06.2009 (Annexure P/ 1) passen by respondent No‘l by which the petitioner who is working as Forest Range Officer. Baioda has been transferred from the Office of For st Circ’ie Chanzpa, District Janjgir Champa to Kansabei Range, Fores Circle, Jashpur. Contention of counsel for he Detitioner is that the transfer order ias been issued in compl te violation of transfer policy. He further submits that as no one ha been posted in his place of posting that itself shows that there is no dministrative exigency for issuing the transfer order. Counsel for the State subi its that let the netitioner make a representation to the respondent o2 and the same would be decided in accordance with law. Accordingl , the petition is gdisposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a representation ‘L i Within a period of fifteen clays from the date of receipt of the copiy of this order and the same would be decided by the authority conceiined strictiy in accordance with law, preferably within a f1 rther periodiof three weeks from the date of its receipt. ... . .. i X Sd/-