VS's"s»/:msssa»SS . 253S Versus ©anerfiR«sm 5<Au, son of Shri C>amrudhor Sahu, aged obout 58 year, Presently posted as Assistait Teocher; Primory Schoot Boar, Block Ba'amkeia, bistrict Raigarh 1. State of Chhcittisgarh, through tHe Secretary, &epurtment of Schoo! Education, Mantraiaya b.K.S. Bhaiyon, Ruipur Cr 2. 'Hie District Officer, Raigarh, &istrict Raigarh (C.©.) , 3. The Block Educotion Qfficer, Baramkelu, District Rajgarh . (C£.\ ' Writ Petition under Articles 226 of the Constitution of Indiu iirgie Beneh; Hon'ble Mr. Jusllce Satish K. Agnihotri. .T Present; Ms. Shanniia Sin9hai, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Awind Oubey. Panel La»»yepfor the State/r'ed OR & E ft yassed on 25th Cioy of Aprii, 2007) 1. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner submits thatvide order dated 31.7.2004, thc petitioner was tfansfer'red from Primary Sehoo!, Boar. BSoek iaramkeia, Pistfiet Raigarh to Primary Sehool, Sokarliya, Biock Dhapamjaig'arh, Distnct Raigarh. 'n'iereafter, the said transfer order ww cancelled vide order dated 17.2.2006. After cancellotion of the said trarsfer order, the petitioner has made a representotion fw release of his Subhosh saiary asthe same became admissible and pcyabte. No stephasbeen taken sofw. !; . : ' ' ! ' :' . 2. In view of that, iearned counsel dppearing for the petitioner' confines his . prsyer to giye direction to the respondents to consider and pass dppropriate ordsr on the representation made by the petitioner, in accordance with !<w, withjn a stlpulated period of time. Leerned counset appear-mg for the respondents h<B no objeetion. It is order occordinglY. The petition stands disposed with a dit'ectidn to the respondents/authorities to consider and decide the representirtion of the "^. • • . ' • ' ' ' ~- petitioner dated 14.11.2006 (Annexure P/4), in accordance with Iwv, on its own merit, within a period of four weeks fr-om the date of.receipt ofa copy of thls order. _—— 1 Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge