IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1612 of 2011 BIRENDRA BHINDWAR @ BIRENDRA PAHARIYA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 31.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report and it appears from perusal of the impugned order as well as submission of the parties that the name of this petitioner first time came in the statement of father of the deceased, which has been recorded at Para 11 of the case diary. It would appear from perusal of the first information report itself, that when the occurrence took place, the father of the deceased was present there and subsequently, when the Ferdbeyan of the informant was recorded, the father of the deceased was also present but the name of the petitioner did not figure in the first information report. Had the father of the deceased identified the petitioner, he would have certainly disclosed the name of the petitioner just after the alleged occurrence. Moreover, having more or less similar allegation several co-accused persons have already been granted privilege of bail by different Benches of this Court. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Supaul in connection with Sessions Trial No. 187 of 2010 arising out of Birpur P.S. Case No. 105 of 2008. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )