'^&M'fs§ sa »Sil'Siilii..S': SFMS'W UfcSlfcsi-'f cr^ / ®-"^- IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S)No. R^"^ /2007(S.B,1 PETITIONER : Bodhram Sidar -^' ^. _- ._- ?/o Shri Munram Sidar ,^1' ,^r i..--' f.-'d'f' .•• Aged about 46 years, Asst. &t" V7-"' .••" \\v-v(J-f:Y..-- Teacher, R/o Village -Jampali, Si'^\0.-'" h1\sir^('" Post- Barpali Via- Sariya, Tah.- ».^.--'' Sarangarh, Dist : Raigarh- (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^- /-:T. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary School Education Departinent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^. District Education Officer Raigarh, Dist : Raigarh-(C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer Block - Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETJTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S) No. 892 of 2007 Petitioner Bodhram Sidar Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh and others SB; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Present: AAr. Vineet Kumar Pcmdey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sushit Dubey, ©ovt.Advocate for the State/ respondents. OR DER (Passed on this 14th Day of February, 2007) 1. The petitioner was appointed on 23.2.1983 as Assistant Teacher on fixed pay scale of Rs. 150/-. After completion of two year probation, he was granted regular poy scale of Rs. 169-300/-. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits tiiat the issue involved in the case is asto whether, the petitioner is entitled to regutar pay scale w.e.f. the date of initia! appointment or aft-er compietion of probation period. a 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by the State Administrative Tribunat, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regubr pocy scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The mati'er was taken-up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Specia! Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Couri- upholding the decision of the Tribunal to ihs effect +hat the Teachers/Assistont Teachers are entitled to regular pay saile from date of initial oppointment. 4. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner furt+ier submits that this Court, while considering the same issue in Aeman Jain vs. The State ©ovemment of Chhattisgarh & another (W. P. No. 1463/20065 by order dated 10.11.2006. has gronted regular pay scale w.e.f. +he date of initiat appointment. 5. Learned coun^l oppearing for the parties jointly submit that this case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in -the case of Aeman Jain vs. The State Sovemment of Chhattisgarh & another (Supra). 6. In view of that, this petition is atlowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Si^hash