IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SA No.95 of 2009 1. DHRUP RAI, Son of late Ramnet Rai. 2. Lalita Devi, Wife of Dhrup Rai. Both are residents of Village-Hariharpur, P.O.-Ekderwan, P.S. Jadopur, District-Gopalganj. ....Defendants...Appellants...Appellants Versus 1. KRISHNA NATH RAI, Son of late Ganesh Rai. 2. Lakshami Kant Rai, Son of late Ganesh Rai. Both are residents of Village-Hariharpur, P.O.-Ekderwan, P.S. Jadopur, District-Gopalganj. .....Plaintiffs...Respondents...Respondents ----------- 5/ 17.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the appellants. 2. The present Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree of affirmation. Learned counsel for the appellants has fairly submitted that claim of the appellants with respect to suit land is based on oral sale and that has been negatived by learned trial court as also by learned lower appellate court. He also submits that dispute between the parties is only with respect to small area of land measuring about 8½ dhurs. 3. After hearing learned counsel for the appellants and on examination of materials available on record, this Court does not find that any substantial question of law is involved in the present Second Appeal. In absence of involvement of any 2 substantial question of law, under the mandate of Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a Second Appeal has to be dismissed. 4. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, particularly in view of the fact that the suit was instituted in the year 2000 and a small area of land measuring about 8½ dhurs is the subject matter of the dispute between the parties, and the claim of the appellants has been rejected by both the courts below, this Court does not find any merit for admission of the present Second Appeal. It is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. Anjani/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)