IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH MARCH 2011 / 18TH PHALGUNA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 306 of 2011(S) -------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.3035/2011 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN WPC -------------------------------------------- A.VEERANKUTTY, S/O MAMMATH, AGED 43 YEARS, ACHIPRA-HOUSE, PO BHEEMANAD, PALAKKAD-DT., 678601 (STORE IN CHARGE, OFFICE OF THE ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER-AGRL. PO PUTHIYARA, KOZHIKODE). BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENT(S): 2ND RESPONDENT IN WPC ---------------------------------------------------- DR.G.SURENDRAN (AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER), DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. ANTONY MUKKATH - GOVT. PLEADER. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. -------------------------------------- Contempt Case (C) No. 306 OF 2011 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner alleges violation of the interim order in the writ petition. Originally, the interim order was passed on 7.2.2011 (Anneuxre-C) directing that no promotion shall be made. By Annexure-D order, that interim order was extended, which was later extended until further orders by Annexure-E. The petitioner's grievance is that in violation of that order, Annexure-F order has been passed. 2. The learned Government Pleader points out that Annexure-F is only a seniority list for promotion and no promotion has actually been made. Having heard both sides, I do not think that insofar as no promotion has been made, there is any violation of the interim order. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd