IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2008 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 35346 of 2008(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. JITHIN THOMAS, S/O.THOMAS, AGED 24 YEARS RESIDING AT UTHINIPARAMBIL HOUSE, MARADU P.O., KUNDANNUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. MUHAMMED JISHAN M., S/O.KUNHIMUHAMMED, AGED 24 YEARS, RESIDING AT MULAKKAL HOUSE, R.S.ROAD, OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. LIJIN GANGADHARAN, S/O.T.V.GANGADHARAN, AGED 24 YEARS, RESIDING AT T.V.HOUSE, KANHIRODE, KOODALI P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. 4. NAVEEN P.N., S/O.NAZEER, AGED 24 YEARS, RESIDING AT NAVYA COTTAGE, PALAPPURAM POST, OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 5. RASAK.M., S/O.ABDULLA, AGED 23 YEARS, RESIDING AT MALOL, IRINGATH P.O. PAYYOLI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 6. SAID MOHAMMED RASHID K.P., AGED 24 YEARS, RESIDING AT SHARIFAS, NAKKATTU PARAMBU, NADUVATTOM, NORTH BEPUR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. WP(C).No. 35346 of 2008 -2- 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY SC SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).35346/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 1st day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioners have completed their B.Tech (Electronics and Communication Engineering) Degree Course from the Al-Ameen Engineering College, Kulappully, Shornur, during the academic year 2003- 07. Apparently, dissatisfied with the marks obtained in one paper, in the 6th Semester supplementary Examination, they had applied for revaluation. They are aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the 6th semester B.Tech supplementary Examination held in December, 2007. Exts.P1 to P6 applications for revaluation are pending before the respondents. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of directing W.P.(C).35346/2008 2 the respondents to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioners in relation to the 6th semester B.Tech supplementary Examination held in December, 2007, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the applications are in order and otherwise correct. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs