Civil Revision No.1148 of 2011(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.1148 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: February 17, 2011 Chander Pehalwan .....Petitioner v. Sandeep and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Sanjay Vij, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside order dated 17.11.2010 passed by learned trial Court vide which evidence of petitioner-plaintiff has been closed. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully including the impugned order passed by learned trial Court. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that though learned trial Court has mentioned in the impugned order that sufficient opportunities were availed by petitioner-plaintiff to adduce evidence, however, the present case was sent to Mediation and Conciliation Centre and the same remained pending there and however, no compromise could be effected and hence, it is contended that only three effective opportunities were granted to petitioner-plaintiff to adduce evidence. It is also contended that on one date of hearing, the case was adjourned on the request of counsel for the defendants for cross-examining the witnesses of the plaintiff, which were already examined. He has further requested that only one opportunity be granted to petitioner-plaintiff to adduce evidence at his own responsibility. Hence, in view of these facts, the present revision petition is Civil Revision No.1148 of 2011(O&M) -2- accepted. Impugned order is modified to the extent that learned trial Court is directed to grant one more effective opportunity to the petitioner-plaintiff to adduce evidence at his own responsibility subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- as cost, which shall be a condition precedent. Disposed of accordingly. 17.2.2011 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge