THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.24066 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner claims to be the owner of premises bearing Nos.9/590/2 and 9/590/3 situated at Bypass Road, Opposite Andhra Bank, Kadiri, Anantapur District. According to her, she filed O.S.No.358 of 2003 in the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kadiri, against respondent Nos.4 and 5 and the Court below decreed the said suit on 07.08.2009 restraining the respondents from interfering with her peaceful possession of the premises in question. Despite the said order, respondent Nos.4 and 5 trespassed into the premises in question. Questioning their highhanded action, she filed I.A.No.154 of 2009 under Order XXXIX Rule 2(a) CPC seeking detention of the respondents to the civil prison and attachment of their properties, but the same was dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, she preferred an appeal and it is pending. While so, the unofficial respondents have submitted an application to the official respondents for providing electricity connection to the premises in question and accordingly, service connection was provided. On coming to know the said fact, the petitioner got issued a legal notice, dated 31.08.2009 to the official respondents stating that the unofficial respondents have no right whatsoever over the premises in question and in fact, as per the decree, dated 07.08.2009, they cannot enter into the same and accordingly, requested the official respondents to remove the service connection as provided by them to the premises in question, on the basis of an application submitted by the unofficial respondents. The grievance of the petitioner is that the official respondents have not taken any action thereon. Hence, this writ petition. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 submitted that it is only after being satisfied that the applicants, who are unofficial respondents herein are in possession of the premises in question, the said service connection was provided. Heard. As contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has a decree in her favour and the unofficial respondents are trespassers and bringing the said fact to the notice of the official respondents, the petitioner got issued a legal notice and requested them to take necessary action. Hence, without expressing any view on the subject matter, this Court directs the official respondents to take necessary action on the said legal notice, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, before taking any action on the said legal notice, if the official respondents feel that the unofficial respondents shall also be heard, they may put them on notice. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J 9th NOVEMBER, 2009. kvni