@ HKGH COURT OF CHEATTESGARH AT BILASPUR WRET PETITIGN gS) No. 3439 ofZMW E’ETETEONER : Rakesh Kumar Sao, Son of Shri Ratthu Ram Sao, aged about 35 years, Occupation- Shikshakarmi Class-II, Posted at Government Middie School, Sooti Janpad Panohayat, Kharsiya, District a Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS . State of Chhattisgarh, though Secrewy; School Education Depamnent, D.K.Bhawa1L Raipur, District Raipur (CG) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, 0i Panchayat and Gramin Vikas Vibhag, Bhopal (MR) Commissionex; Pubiic instmction: Raipur (C.G.) Collector, Raigai‘h, Disirict ~ Raigarh (CG) Disirict Panchaya‘i, through Chief Execu‘iive Oi‘flcer Janpad Panchayat, Kharsiya, District — Raigarh (CG) 6. Degree La} i’atel, Shiksha Kanni, resident of Viiiage—Padigaon, Post Padigaon, District — Raigarh (CG) WRIT PETETION bi TDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CGNSTITUHON OF INDIA Smgie Bench : Hon’hie Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. Fresent: Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja’ Dy. Govt. Advocate forthe State / respondent No. 1 to 4. RES?G’NDENTS g r $WUI;~ ORDER (Passed on 25a; dayof June, 2007) Shri Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the 9etitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to grant of 25 marks for three years experience that he has obtained iike resporadent No. 6. Learned counsel further submits that the respondent no. 6 has been granted 25% marks-for the experience he has obtained but the petitioner has beer: denied the benefit of exyerience iilegaliy. 2. Be that as it may. The Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat, Raigarh is directed to look into the matter in accordance with law and pass appropriate order. 3. In View of the foregoing, this etition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/— t Satish K. Agnihotri l Judge A p