IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1158 of 2011 MD. HANIF ALAM @ MD. HANIF, son of Md. Arif Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 14.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner being husband of the complainant seeks his bail in connection with Complaint Case no.3483(C) of 2009 for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 384, 379 of the I.P.C., but cognizance has been taken only for the offence under Section 498A of the I.P.C. Admittedly, the above stated complaint case was filed on 5.12.2009 and the marriage of the complainant had taken place four years ago with the petitioner. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that on 3.12.2009 the mother of the petitioner was brutally assaulted by one Md. Razabul/@ Karu and other persons, for which mother of the petitioner lodged Jokihat P.S. Case No.235 of 2009 and after that the aforesaid accused persons managed the complainant and got 2 lodged the above stated complaint case. To buttress his submission he drew my attention to column of witnesses of the complaint petition in which one Md. Razabul/@ Karu has been cited as witness. Considering the aforesaid facts and submissions of the parties petitioner, namely, MD. HANIF ALAM @ MD. HANIF is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with above stated Complaint Case no.3483(C) of 2009. PN ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)