-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISIDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3018 OF 2004 Shri.Arvind Narhar Aranke ..Petitioner Vs. Smt.Chinabai Thaku Aakhade and Ors. ..Respondents .... Mr.U.B.Nighot for Petitioner .... CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. DATE : FEBRUARY 7,2005 DATE : FEBRUARY 7,2005 DATE : FEBRUARY 7,2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of this petition, the decree impugned has already been executed and therefore, this petition has become infructuous. 2. The same is rejected as such. 3. Amount of Rs.2500/- deposited towards costs of litigation, be refunded to the petitioner on submission of proof that decree has been executed. [ B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. ]