IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 16637 of 2008 Decided on: 11.08.2010 Bhagwati Prasad. …Petitioner Versus Municipal Corporation. …Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. B.S. Attri, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. B.S. Attri, Advocate prays and is permitted to withdraw the present petition enabling him to approach the appropriate Forum, as advised. It is made clear that in case the petitioner approaches the appropriate Forum under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the plea of limitation/delay and laches will not come in the way of petitioner since he has been persuing the remedy in this Court. 2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed having been withdrawn. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge August 11, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?