IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 2ND JULY 2007 / 11TH ASHADHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 972 of 2007(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.27966/2006 Dated 14/12/2006 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ---------------------------- REJI MATHEW, S/O. O.T.MATHEW, AGED 38 YEARS, OONNUKALLAM THOTTIYIL, KATTACHIRA POST, ETTUMANOOR, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.E.R.VENKATESWARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- SHRI. RAJAN P.S., (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), AUTHORISED OFFICER & CHIEF MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA, CHALA BRANCH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. BY ADV. SRI.A.S.P. KURUP, SC, UBI THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J. ------------------------- C.O.C. No. 972 of 2007 ------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2007. JUDGMENT This contempt petition is filed alleging that the direction in Annexure A1 judgment is not implemented. Learned standing counsel for the Union Bank of India reported that the 3rd respondent in Annexure A1, the owner of the property, was found dead in her well when the officials went to her house to execute the order of the Recovery Officer. In view of the above development, I think, it is not proper to initiate any contempt proceedings against the officials, at present, for not implementing the direction contained in Annexure A1 judgment. Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to move again, after some time. Sd/- (K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR) JUDGE sk/ //true copy// P.S. To Judge