.-- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI U + CRL.M.C. 3028/2008 0/o BEENA RANI ..... Petitioner Through Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. .. ... Respondents CORAM: Through Mr. O.P. Saxena, Adv. for the State. Mr. A.K. Mishra with Mr. M.K. Upadhaya, Adv. for R-2. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.L.BHAYANA ORDER 23.03.2010 It is submitted by learned counsel for both the parties that the matter has been settled between the parties in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 02.2.2010. Settlement Agreement is exhibited 'PX' and the same is placed on record. Mr. Amit Gupta, Special Power of Attorney holder of respondent no.2, Jagdish Chand Gupta is present in Court and submits that in terms of Settlement Agreement (Ex. PX) the parties have arrived at a settlement and he has no objection if the FIR No. 590/2005 u/s 380/420 IPC registered at PS Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi is quashed. Heard. In my opinion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing with the said FIR, particularly when the parties have settled their Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified disputes amicably. In view of the above, the petition is allowed and 1 FIR No. 590/2005 u/s 380/420 IPC registered at PS Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi and all other proceedings arising thereof are ordered to be quashed against the accused/petitioner. Both the parties are directed to remain bound by the terms and conditions as envisaged in the Settlement Agreement (Ex. PX). The petition stands disposed of. Dasti. S.L.BHAYANA,J - fvJ,T'f,{}.No. lfB'i-7.-/JO -! o-1' R -rdea11.e t!>.p F .;v-. Jie - of On .? '3/B/:?o/O. - eli ,_,;,_jf)()jo OY\