IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7572 of 2011 RANJIT YADAV & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 28.2.2011 None appears for the petitioners. However, I have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the state. It is true that the FIR contains the names of the petitioners and bears general allegation also that the accused persons came to the house of the informant and made indiscriminate firing at him but as may appear from the rejection order itself, the statement of the injured was recorded in paragraph 15 of the case diary in which the names of these petitioners did not appear as persons who had fired at him or had committed any overt act. In view of the above fact, let petitioners Ranjit Yadav, Rama Yadav, Bachcha Yadav, Ghuran Yadav and Baleshwar Yadav be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5000/(five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Rosera, Samastipur in Bithan P.S. Case no. 37 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down in section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)