IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2008 / 14TH POUSHA 1929 Crl.MC.No. 43 of 2008() ----------------------- C.C.NO.154 OF 2007 OF THE J.F.C.M-1, PUNALUR PETITIONER: -------------------- MARIAYAM BEEVI, W/O.IBRAHIM RWTHER, PALLITHEKKETHIL VEEDU, THAZHAMEL MURI, ANCHAL VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.SUBHASH CYRIAC RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, RAM MOHAN PALACE COMPOUND, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.M.C.No.43 of 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 4th day of January, 2008 ORDER Petitioner, a woman, who is the 2nd accused in Crime No.72 of 2002 of Anchal Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 420 read with 34 IPC, seeks to quash Annexure AII charge sheet. 2. Going by the averments in the charge sheet, it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the petitioner. The petitioner has been absconding before the J.F.C.M-I, Punalur, where the co-accused faced trial in C.C.No.419 of 2007. The only course open to the petitioner is to surrender before the learned Magistrate and seek regular bail, and then stand trial on the said charge. 3. Accordingly, this Crl.M.C is disposed of permitting the petitioner to surrender before the learned Magistrate and file an application for regular bail within a period of two weeks from today. In case she complies with the above condition, the learned Magistrate shall consider and dispose of the bail application preferably on the same date, taking note of the fact Crl.M.C.No. 43 of 2007 2 that the petitioner is a woman who is entitled to the benefit of the provisions under Section 437 Cr.P.C and also taking note of the fact that the co-accused have been acquitted after trial. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj