CR No.2099 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.2099 of 2011 Date of Decision: 18 - 7 - 2011 Sunita ....Petitioner v. Krishan Parshad and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA *** Present: Mr.Ajit Sihag, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Baljeet K. Bhullar, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr.Neeraj Khanna, Advocate for Mr.Ravinder Arora, Advocate for respondent No.3. *** KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) In the present revision petition, impugned order dated 7.9.2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rupnagar (hereinafter to be referred as, `the Tribunal') has been assailed, whereby the claim petition filed against respondent No.1 was dismissed, as the petitioner failed to serve him in spite of having availed numerous opportunities. Counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner had made vigorous efforts to serve respondent No.1 but he is not available at the given address. Counsel states that petitioner is ready to serve respondent No.1 CR No.2099 of 2011 [2] through alternative mode by publishing a notice in the newspaper having wide circulation in the locality. Petitioner in this petition has also failed to serve respondent No.1. Ms.Baljeet K. Bhullar, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 and Mr.Neeraj Khanna, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 state that they have no objection in case respondent No.1 is served through publication by the Tribunal. In view of above, the impugned order dated 7.9.2010 is set aside. The Tribunal is directed to effect service upon respondent No.1 through publication. Revision petition stands disposed of. ( KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA ) July 18, 2011. JUDGE RC