-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.8029 OF 2006 Shri Sadashiv Nanasaheb Nanekar & Ors. : Petitioners (Orig.Deft.nos.1,2,18,20, 29, 30 & 35) V/s. Shri Eknath Damu Nanekar & Ors. : Respondents ... Mr.Sugandh Deshmukh for the petitioners. ... CORAM : S.A.BOBDE, J. DATE : JULY 6, 2007. P.C. 1. The petitioners have challenged the order of the trial Court permitting amendment of the plaint by the plaintiffs. In the suit for partition filed by the respondents, the plaintiffs sought an amendment by which they sought to challenge the transaction between the defendant nos.1, 2 and 29 to 35 entered into with the defendant nos.42 and 43. By the said transaction, certain property, which according to the respondents, is joint family property has been wrongly alienated by the petitioners-defendants and according them, the alienation would not be binding on their share. By the amendment, -: 2 :- they have sought a declaration to that effect. 2. There is no material irregularity or error of jurisdiction or perversity shown by the petitioners in the grant of the amendment. There is no merit in the petition which is hereby dismissed. S.A. BOBDE, J.