CWP No.45/2008. 25.03.2008 Present: Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Avind Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the State Bank of India states that there were some discrepancies, therefore, the loan was refused. However, if the petitioner approaches in accordance with the standard of the State Bank of India, as far as loan is concerned, the authority concerned will consider the matter in accordance with law/ policy/ guidelines, etc., by a speaking order. With these observations and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is finally disposed of. CMP Nos.53 and 54 of 2008 Infructuous. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. March 25, 2008. (Surinder Singh),J. (Pds)