1 Lpa55-11 dmt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2988 OF 1998 Fujitsu ICIM Ltd. .... Appellant. vs. S.B.Patole & Ors. .... Respondents. Mr. Mr. K.S. Bapat by M/s. Desai and Desai Associcates for Appellant. Ms. Nayana Buch for Respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 to 8 & 10 & 11 . CORAM : P.B. MAJMUDAR & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 15TH JUNE, 2011. P.C. This appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 29.10.2010 passed in Writ Petition No. 2988 of 1998. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has remanded the matter back to the Industrial Court for determination as to whether the workmen would be entitled to full back wages from 31.7.1997 till the date of that order and also held that the closure of the unit where the respondent workmen were serving is found to be a illegal closure. The said order is challenged on various grounds. 2 Lpa55-11 2. It is pointed out that during the pendency of the petition, the dispute is settled by the management with number of employees except the present nine employees. Today the Court is also informed that the nine employees have also settled the dispute. The consent terms filed by the concerned workers are also placed on record. Out of the concerned nine employees, four employees are present before the Court and they are identified by Ms. Buch. The consent terms are signed by all the nine employees. The employees present today before the Court are :- (1) Mr. V.S. Tupe, (2) Mr. Dinesh Ghadge, (3) Mr. S.K. Bhujbal and (4) Mr. M.L. Bhosale. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that all the respondents have signed the consent terms and it was brought to their notice. The consent terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. On behalf of the company the Company Secretary has signed the same. The parties to act accordingly. The orders passed by the learned Single Judge as well as by the Industrial Court are accordingly substituted by the present consent terms. On behalf of the appellant company an undertaking is also given to this Court that whatever amount which is required to be paid shall be paid within a period of four weeks from today. The said undertaking is taken on record. The appellant to act accordingly. 3. The Letters Patent Appeal is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. No order as to costs. 3 Lpa55-11 4. In view of the disposal of the L.P.A. the civil application does not survive. The same stands dismissed. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (P.B. MAJMUDAR, J.)