HE HIGH COURT OF JUDIAURE CT AT BILASPUR W.P NO . rs. aa ani, age ears. ife i . ni ,Rd f Cil L, Rj esient o iv ines aipulr (C.G.) VU ERS V 1. Stat ' , e of Chhattisgarh, hraug ecretary, epartment of Mnn K S Bhawan, Raiur (C he Collector, urg G he M1n1n Officer Dur /s Rajdanl Buck Through Partner/Pro Srl Shaies iwa Station Road alur C RDER/DIRECTIONS THE NATURE OF SUCH WRITS l Q) R CHHATTISGARH 2Q8 / 2002 M Rm Atl 55 y W of Shr K. B Atla, ' Th S D iig, D p G) ‘ T D (C ) ‘ T g g ,fM h s p h lh Tn, Rp ( G) l ETITION UNDER ART 226/22 I P 7 CONSTITUTON OF INDIA FOR SSUANCE’0F{WRIT OF CERTIORARI MANDAMUS AND/O I R O 3mm 07.02.2002 ieJxmed counsel for The pefifioner and Heard Shr§ Ayuz Navedi Dr.N.K.5hukia, 3earned Addl. Aldvocafe Géneml wi'rh Shri Deep L Kesharwani, ieamed Panel Lawyer Am" fhe respondents No.1 ‘rgéf if; The pdi‘rioner has in ‘this ’Wjr‘ri'rion sought far issuewf a wri? in V The 5a1'ure ’ of cerfior‘ar'i qua Hing fhe impugned order. dgfed 06.11.2001 passed by The Coiiec‘? r, Durg — second ’r'esponden‘r gerein and The dafed 13.01.4001 - Annexure P—IIO fhe and agreemen'i' regarding Jease for ear-rh excava'fion fro; The land in possession of The pefihoner. if is submi‘Hed’ by The Ad l. Advoca‘fe General fhaf as againsf The order Annexure P—9 passed :y 1'he Collecfor, Durg - responden‘l‘ No2 herein, appeal lies +0 ihe Co_' missioner of Raipur Division; In 'ihe lcircums‘l‘ances, therefore The p fifion is no? mainfainable and The appeal lies againsi’ The order_A nexure P-9 passed by The second respondenT To ThelCommissioner, Raipur, 1 am of, The opinion ThaT The ,r—I—4W/V _ ' mm §§x i ggMwK’ I “\peTi‘rion is liable lo be dismissed with liberty To The _ pe‘ri'rioner “To approach fhe Cummissioner by filing an appeal for proper relief. Ordered accordingly The pe’riiion is dismisse i. If The appeal is filed by ‘il‘ie pe‘ii‘rioner, The Cammissioner wifhin ieve’n days 9f ‘l'he \same wifhou‘r ‘fram 1oday would dispose reference To ‘rhe limi‘r'a'fion. Sdl- Chief Justice