Farad Continuation Sheet IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5747 OF 2011 DIGAMBAR MADHAVRAO UCHALE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioner(s) : Shri Godhamgaonkar P.G. AGP for Respondent(s): Shri Suryavanshi K.M. ... CORAM : D B BHOSALE & S B DESHMUKH, JJ. Dated: August 10, 2011 ... 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to respondents 1 to 4 to take action on his application, which was submitted by him on 5.6.2008. We have perused the application. That application refers to some incident that occurred on 4.6.2008, in which the petitioner was given threat of his life. 3. In our opinion, Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot be exercised to entertaining such prayers. 4. Hence the Writ Petition is dismissed. However, the dismissal of the Writ Petition shall not preclude the petitioner from either approaching respondent 4 or any other authority for redressal of his grievance. If the petitioner approaches respondent 4 afresh, we hope respondent 4 will consider the petitioner's application in proper perspective. ( S B DESHMUKH, J. ) ( D B BHOSALE, J. ) ... akl