CWP No. 684 of 2006 18.9.2008 Present: Mr. Dalip K.Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Dy. Advocate General for respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to show any provision of law whereby the license to run a saw-mill can be transferred by the person to whom it is granted to any other person with or without the permission of the authorities. It is, therefore, obvious that any person wanting to run a saw-mill cannot seek the transfer or renewal of the license held by some other person. In view of this, the petition is rejected. However, the petitioner is at liberty to apply afresh for grant of license to run a saw-mill in his own name. This application shall be considered by the respondents in accordance with law. In case the petitioner applies for grant of such license within a period of two months from today the respondents shall take a decision thereon within three months thereafter. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No costs. ( Deepak Gupta ), J. September 18, 2008 ( V.K.Ahuja), J. ™