1 S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.3849/2006 Date : 04.09.2006 HON'BLE MR.SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. M.L. Bishnoi for the applicant. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and carefully gone through the impugned order. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was absconding and remained absent for three months and thereafter he surrendered himself before the learned trial court. He further submits that since last 15 days, the accused applicant is in judicial custody, therefore, the accused applicant should be enlarged on bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 2 I have considered the submissions made before me. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case and in the interest of justice, I deem it proper to grant applicant one more opportunity to remain on bail during the pendency of trial. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the applicant Suresh son of Ramratan shall be released on bail in Sessions Case No.72/2004, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. vij