1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7634/2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3992/2004 (Decided) Saraswati Education Society and another ...Versus... Dilip Govindrao Raut and another _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, office Memoranda of Coram Court's or Judge's order appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's order. __________________________________________________________________ CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 19.12.2005. 1. Heard Advocate Shri Deshpande for petitioners-applicants and Advocate Shri Harkare for respondent no.1 employee. 2. Advocate Shri Deshpande states that the documents have been referred to handwriting expert and after receipt of report, that evidence would be required to be recorded before the Inquiry Officer. He therefore, seeks time of three months to complete the inquiry. Request is opposed by Advocate Shri Harkare 2 who states that this is second extension and time as extended has already expired on 29.11.2005. He points out that application for extension is therefore technically not maintainable because it is made after expiry of time. 3. Considering the nature of charges and the fact that present respondent no.1 is already reinstated and he is earing monthly salary, time is extended by three months as a last chance. It is made clear that if within said time the inquiry is not completed, petitioners shall not be entitled to seek further extension of time. Civil Application is accordingly allowed. JUDGE SSW