CWP No. 11201 of 2006 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 11201 of 2006 Date of decision: September 17, 2008 Ashwani Kumar --- Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ---- Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashutosh Mohunta Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta Present: Mr. SS Toor, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Charu Tuli, Sr. DAG, Punjab, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Sukhjinder Singh, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. Ashutosh Mohunta, J (Oral. Petitioner prays for issuance of a direction to the respondents to consider his application for appointment to the post of ETT teacher. He has applied for the said post in pursuance of the advertisement Annexure P1. Counsel for respondents No.2 & 3 submits that the petitioner could not be selected because the lowest merit in his category secured a score of 123.21, whereas the petitioner had secured only 92.82 score. CWP No. 11201 of 2006 2 Counsel for respondents No.2 & 3 further submits that the case of the petitioner was not considered because he had secured 92.82 marks, i.e. less than the minimum prescribed score of 100. Thus on both the counts, the petitioner was not eligible to be selected as ETT teacher. There is no merit in the present writ petition. The same is hereby dismissed. [Ashutosh Mohunta] Judge [Rajan Gupta] Judge September 17, 2008 `ask'