... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1705 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri Indrajeet Joshi for the Applicant. Shri K.V. Saste, A.P.P. for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 20, 2006. : JUNE 20, 2006. : JUNE 20, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. This is the second Bail Application preferred by the Applicant. First Bail Application was rejected on merits on considering all the materials on record. In this Application the only ground pressed is that the trial has not proceeded inspite of the direction given by this court in the earlier orders. This argument is countered by the learned A.P.P. by pointing out that the trial of the case was stayed by Division Bench of this Court on 01st February, 2005 and stay operated till 04th April, 2006. As stay of trial is now vacated, the trial has commenced. Charges have been framed on 18th May, 2006 and matter is now fixed for recording of evidence on 11th July, 2006. In this view of the matter, it is not possible to entertain the request of the ... 2 ... Applicant for release of bail on the ground that the trial has not progressed. Hence, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE