.;"s., y h. ^^ vy" c ^'w( IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPtfR (CHHATnSGARHl WRIT PETITION N0. 33?X /2006. PETITIONER: ^ Padman Singh Indoria, S/o Gajm Ram ....• Indoria, aged about 40 years, residence of ^^..•-"vmage Atarjhola, Post Muhgaon, Sajs Chhatdsgarh. -.•••"' . ~ [.^•^'^.••••"'villageAtarjhola, Post Muhgaon, Saja, l<~A?-"n C4hP" ...•••'" ?--"n V.\>")n ..-••"" District Durg, Chhatdsgarh. ^^^•p"- ss »- Respondents VERSUS /\. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretaiy School Mucation Department Ministry D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur, Chhattisgarh. /2. Director of School Education Office»; D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. The District Education Officer, Bemetara, Durg, Chhattisgarh. WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI. PROHIBmON AND FOR THE OTHER SIMILAR WRIT OR WRITS. ORDER OR ORDERS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. XI-HC-22 sn^Tqir R-fi+an^r Shliqidfer Ban/e /^y 's^ •<(|<<|M<<, »Tn^'i(s,Ricfiyy STT^T 1?1<h f1*<C(Tsh*ll<»)^w^.^^ i^^;' W^ 200 311^1 gkiiwflfer Heard Shri O.P. Sahu. counsf Govt. Advocate for the State/respondi The case of the petitioner is since 8-3-91 and as per the Instructi- M.P. the Assistant Teachers who examination on their own expenses increments and order ofGovernment B. T.1. examination on his own oost Annexure-P/5, but the petitioner hc similarly situated persons have been orders ofthe Tribuna! and this Court Having heard ,'earned counse| and circumstances of the case. '"/ithou case, the petitioner is allowed to makj ofthis petition raising a!l his grievancj days from today and in turn, respond) the petitioner in the light of avermentj in the representation also. If respoi) similarly situated persons have b^ increments and the petitioner's cas^ increments on t.he basis of period of 3 months from today, in acof Governrfient's With the dtrectjon aforesaid, arties are entitled for oertifiecf <»>i<<In<fl-(*<iiiiT¥te^)'<R)+<;i< ^l3lf^I]-3TI^T |1 for the petitioner and Shri Sumesh Bajaj, |nts, on advanoe copy. |that he is vrerking as Assistant Teacher ^ns dated 24-12-98 issued bythe State of have passed B.T.I., B.Ed. and M.Ed; jfter 22-10-64 are entitled for two advance Annexure-P/1. The petitioner passed his |n 1-3-99 and a certificate io that effect is |s not been given the benefit whereas, Branted two advance increments under the lide Annexure-P/6, for the parties, having regard to the facts |)t expressing any opinion of the merit of the ^ a detailed representation along with copy is to respondent No.3 within a period of 15 °nt No.3 is directed to examine the case of made by the petitioner in this petition and ident No.3 reaohes to the conc'usion that |en granted the benefit of two advance is also covered for grant of two advance order, then to pass orders within a srdance with law. |e petition stands disposed of. of this order. Sdi- , ^^. Sl^d0° jUdS® Cf^y^) J^