IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 18TH MARCH 2008 / 28TH PHALGUNA 1929 RP.No. 340 of 2008(F) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.16438/2005 Dated 16/01/2008 .................... PETITIONER ----------------- CHOLA SAHIDA,D/O. AHAMMEDKUTTY HAJI KEESHUPARAMBA AMSOM AND DESOM, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SAJU.S.A RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THRIKKARIYOOR DEVASWOM,,REPRESENTED BY EXECUTIVE OFFICER, K.BALAJI S/O. P.K. KARUNAKARA MENON,MANJERI AMSOM AND DESOM,ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THRIKKARIYOOR DEVASWOM,,,FIT PERSONS THONNATH CHERIYAKKAN MASTER,S/O. UNNEERIKUTTY KEEZHUPARAMBA AMSOM AND DESOM, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, SECREATIRIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SMT.PRABHA R.MENON BY G.P. SRI.K.J.MUHAMMED ANZAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- R.P. NO. 340/2008 in W.P.(C) 16438 of 2005 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of March , 2008 O R D E R Sri.T.Krishnanunni, the learned Senior Counsel convinces me that there was sufficient cause for the counsel for the review petitioner not being present when the case was called for hearing on 16.1.2008. I recall my judgment dated 16.1.2008 and post the writ petition for hearing. Call for records relating to O.A.8044/1975 from the Land Tribunal, Malappuram. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. dpk