IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 3277 of 2007 Between: V.Sridhar S/o.V.Rama Murthy R/o.H.No.4-1901/2A, Greamspet, Chittoor District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Secretary, Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission Hyderabad 2 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Secretary, Transport Roads & Buildings Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 3 The Transport Commissioner, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari by calling the records pertaining to judgment and order in OA.No.6287 of 2004 dated 29.12.2006 and quash the same as bad in law arbitrary and unconstitutional being contrary to Article 14 and 254 of the constitution of India and consequently hold that the writ petition is entitled to be appointed as an Assistant Motor Vehicles Inspector if he is otherwise qualified as per the selection process pursuant to the notification No.13/2004 by the 1st respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.VIJAY KUMAR DEVINENI Counsel for Respondent No.1: MR.M.VIJAY KUMAR The Court made the following : ORDER: (per Sri Ghulam Mohammed, J) This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of certiorari to quash order dated 29-12-2006 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad in O.A No. 6287 of 2004 and to declare that the petitioner is entitled to be appointed as an Assistant Motor Vehicles Inspector, if he is otherwise qualified as per the selection process pursuant to notification No.13/2004 of the 1st respondent. This Court on 22-02-2007 while admitting the writ petition granted interim direction to permit the petitioner to appear for interview, if he is otherwise qualified in the written test. It is now represented by the learned counsel for respondent No.1 that the petitioner has not succeeded in the written test and, therefore, he is not called for the interview. In the circumstances, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. It is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. GHULAM MOHAMMED, J C.V. RAMULU, J 13-06-2008 ks ………... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Secretary, Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission Hyderabad 2 The Secretary, Transport Roads & Buildings Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad 3 The Transport Commissioner, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad 4 2 CD copies.