IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Civil Contempt Petition No. 146 of 2006 Smt. Hema Kandpal … Petitioner Vs Pankaj Kumar & another … Respondents Sri Alok Mehra, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Manoj Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner Sri J.C. Pande, learned counsel for the respondent Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J This petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Court Act has been filed by the petitioner for summoning the respondents and punishing them for willfully disobedience and flouting the judgment and order dated 22.03.2006 passed by this Court in Writ Petition NO. 1140 of 2005 (S/S). Smt. Hema Kandapl Vs Contonment Board & another. 2. The learned Singly Judge of this Court vide judgment and order dated 22.03.2006 passed following orders and the relevant portion of the judgment is quoted below:- “In view of the above, a writ of mandamus is issued directing the respondents to pay salary and allowances to the petitioner for the post of Head Mistress from 1.4.2003 to 31.8.2004 within month after obtaining certified copy of this order. Respondents are also directed to make available details of salary, G.P. Fund and issue certificate in Form No. 16 for production of tax at source regularly for each financial year.” 3. The Cantonment Board preferred the special appeal before this Court and the Division Bench of this Court confirmed the findings recorded by the learned Single Judge vide judgment and order dated 24.04.2006. 4. The counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents and thereafter misc. application has also been filed by the respondent No. 2 along with an affidavit, in which it has been stated that the arrears of pay and allowances have been paid to the petitioner by the respondent vide cheque dated 02.06.2006. 5. In view of the affidavit filed by the respondent, it appears to me that the order passed by this Court has been complied with. Therefore, I do not find any justification to continue the proceedings under the Contempt of Court Act against the respondents. 6. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed. 7. The notices issued against the respondents are hereby discharged. (B.C. Kandpal, J) 19.03.2009 ASWAL