XI-HG—78 SV^I fS d-»sh '^9!tt Sf^^f^ €i + HWW ^>ffWi ^sr "4i<<i<'iAi, ^Til'y'iio, fq^iyy ..ro.±...Bi^.^y, sn^rwv (^f^i^r) wiTm^fta sii^i PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS /CONTEMNERS; (Appilcation U/S 10 & 12 oft Article215o ilnaie Bench: Hort 1S-S-2fli18:- '••w's'&9if''^'^S a '* Shri vivek Sharma, coul Shri Utkarsh Verma, cot Heard. - <^i<i[(n<4li tTT^f ^f fs^l <f;3i<^i< ^3ffiTT3nt?r Dudhnath, S/o Late Mansharam, aged about 43 years, R/o Viilage: Katui Board, Post Office: S.A.F. Line, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) •O.P. Rathor, Director Generai of Police, Head Quarter, Raipur (C.G.) 2^ A.K. Shrivastava, insp General of Pollce, Speciai Armed Force Poiice, 32 Banfllow Bhiiai, r^^A^^A r\isv^ /f^ /"* \ UiSsnci uurg ^i-.u!.) U.R. Netam, Oeputy inspector Genera! of Police, 32 Bunglow, Bhiiai, Distt. Durg (C.G.) T.J. Longkuber Commandent, First Battailon, Chhattisgarh Armed Poiice Bhilai, Distt. Durg ff^. f~k \ \^.^.) fHo Contempt of Courts Act, 1 971 read w'th the Const'itution of India) 'bte Shri Dhirendra Mishra. J. ise! for the petitioner. ~ nse! for the respondents. /5^ S ^sfi^^^. 1 '^.^^fs:s~^ ^ ^ J? ^ ^S. ''^ SSS^^ ^!^ ^^s&^ XI-HG—78 sn^r w WM W^ 'SPfT^T ^>q?<=b Barve + "3's^ "41-4!d'4, 8itlly41<», fqoi'My 3II^T'<PRi' ('^rf^^T) ?^mw ^ft^ aii^i This contempt petition comoliance of the State Admin which was subsequently conflr 2004 passed in VV.P. No.2344/ to Day subsistence ailo'wance hjas been fiied by the petitioner for non- ijlstrative Tribunai's order dated 27-8-2002 -i|ned by this Court vide order dated 14-5- •if.002 whereby respondents were directed Ifor the Deriod from 25-7-2000 to 28-4- 'JI The respondents in theirl to pay the amount as directed Tor that purpose they had also] on 29-3-2007- The respondenti) for inordlnate de'ay !n compiyirl brought to the notice of the petition, contemnor No.1 has di Taking into consideration| ilso considering that the resj passed by the SAT though witll that contemnor No.1 has diedl apoiogy tendered by the r< proceedings are drdpped. The petition is accordingl ch(<l^T<ft'T TTm?Tf "^f fe[?t <rfli<^i< ^aifinan^n |repiy have stated t.hat they are prepared ^y the S.A.T. by the aforesaid order and |drawn cheque in favour of the petltioner :^ have also tendered unquaiiffed apoiogy 1a wth the order of the SAT, !t was aiso pourt thai during ths pendency of this libd.. 1 the facts and csrcumstances of the case, .it'ondsnts have comptied wiih the order inordlnate deiay and further considering Iduring the pendency of the petition, the esdondents is acceDted and the contempt i disposed of:' Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge