IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2010 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 10535 of 2010(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.NARAYANAN NAIR, S/O. CHATHU NAIR, KARICHERY HOUSE, KARICHERY, MYLATTI P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.P.K.PRIYA SRI.K.V.SREE VINAYAKAN SRI.K.M.HASHIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CHIEF MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, KANHANGAD BRANCH, P.O.KANHANGAD. 2. THE GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL OFFICER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, KANHANGAD P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R.), HOSDURG. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PANAYAL P.O., PANAYAL, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.P.V.SURENDRANATH FOR R1 G.P. SRI.BIJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ------------------------ W.P.(C)Nos.10535 & 10590 OF 2010 ------------------------ Dated this the 8th day of April, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this court challenging the steps taken by the respondent bank for realisation of the amount stated as due from the petitioner. When the matter came up for consideration, the proceedings were intercepted as per order dated 29/3/2010 subject to the condition that the petitioner deposited a sum of Rs.10,000/- within one week from that date. 2. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent bank submits that the condition imposed by this court has not been complied with and there is no petition for enlargement of time for complying with the conditions. 3. In the above circumstances, interference is declined and the Writ Petitions are dismissed, however, without prejudice to the right and liberty of the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy by approaching the DRT. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. dpk WPC NO. -2- dpk