IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.16967 of 1999 Between: Pinnamaneni Venkateshwara Rao, S/o. Sri P. Anjaneyulu R/o. Quarter No.NB.254, Ganeshpuram, Kothagudem, Khammam District-507101. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Singareni Colleries Company Ltd, Rep. by its Chairman & Managing Director, Kothagudem - 507101, Khammam District 2 The Chairman & Managing Director, Singareni Colleries Company Ltd.,, Kothagudem - 507101, Khammam District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to o issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate a writ, order or direction under Art.226 of the Constitution of India and declare (A) Rules, 9,9.1,12,12.1 of the Conduct, Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1989 of the Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd.,, (B) The Charge Sheet of the 2nd Respondent issued in Reference No.C28/1580, Dt.26.6.1999 as violative of the Fundamental Rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Article 14, 19(1)(g)(a) of the Constitution of India or in the alternative be pleased to hold that the charge numbers 1 to IV mentioned in the impugned charge sheet of the 2nd Respondent issued in Reference No.C28/1580, Dt.26.6.1999 do not come under the purview of Rules, 9.1 and 12.1 of the Conduct, Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1989 of the Singareni Collieries Company Limited. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.V.T.M.PRASAD Counsel for Respondents: Mr.K.SRINIVASA MURTHY The Court made the following: Order: There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. __________________________ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY. June 11, 2008 MRR