1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITON NO. 8443 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Mr. S.P. Tiwari, Advocate holding for Mr. N.L. Choudhari, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI,J. DATE : 14th December, 2009 PER COURT : 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner impugns the order dated 15th April, 2009, for production of certain documents came to be rejected. The petitioner also challenges the order dated 23rd November, 2009, vide which the application for seeking review of the aforesaid order, has been rejected. 2. While rejecting the application for production of documents the learned trial court has observed that no reason even for name sake is given as to why the application was moved at such a belated stage, when the witness of the defendant was being cross examined. While rejecting the review application, it has been found that no ground for 2 invoking the review jurisdiction has been made out. 3. In that view of the matter, no perversity could be noticed with the approach adopted so as to warrant interference in the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence, writ petition is rejected. [B.R. GAVAI,J.] grt/-