IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 6416 of 2009 Between: 1 Smt. Rehana Begum, W/o. Mohd. Rafiuddin R/o. SRT-763M Sanathnagar, Hyderabad. 2 Mohd. Rafiuddin S/o. Mohd. Masiuddin R/o. SRT-763M Sanathnagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited (APCPDCL), rep by its Chairman & Managing Direcotr, Hyderabad. 2 Divisional Engineer, Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited, (APCPDCL), Operation City V Electiricity, North Circle, Metro Zone, Paradise, Secunderabad. 3 The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited (APCPDCL), Operation City V Electricity, District XIX, Marredpally Secunderabad. 4 The Assistant Engineer, Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited (APCPDCL), Operation City V Electricity North Cirlce, Metro Zone, Gimkhana, Secunderabad. 5 Sri K.Ashok Kumar, S/o. Balaji Rao, R/o. H.No.1-19-76 Rasoolpura, Secunderabad. 6 Smt. K.Amrutha, W/o. K.Ashok Kumar, R/o. H.No.1-19-76 Rasoolpura, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.ALI FAROOQUE Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4: O.MANOHAR REDDY(SC FOR APTRANSCO) Counsel for Respondent Nos.5 and 6: --------- The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, preferably a Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the high handed action of the official respondents in disconnecting power supply to the Meter with service number B 026182 AC - 1868 Connected to the Mulgi in premises No.1-19-76 sitauted at Rasoolpura, Secunderabad, and taking away the same as being arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction, contrary to the principles of natural justice and also in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents to forthwith restore power supply to the said meter.” At the hearing, Sri Ali Farooq, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that after filing of the Writ Petition, the petitioner vacated the premises in question and is in the process of applying for transfer of service connection to a different premises. He, therefore, submitted that the Writ Petition may be closed as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to pursue his proposed application for transfer. The request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is accepted and the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.8382 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 2nd June, 2008 LUR