:1: :1: :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8358 OF 2007 Vijay S.Bahirat .. Petitioner. Vs. Minal Vijay Bahirat & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.V.A.Shastry for the petitioner. Mr.A.V.Chatuphale for the respondents. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 19TH MARCH, 2008. DATED : 19TH MARCH, 2008. DATED : 19TH MARCH, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this petition the petitioner has challenged an order dated 29.9.2007 passed by the Family Court by which it has disposed of the application at Exhibit-2 granting interim maintenance of Rs.2,000/- each to the children from the date of the application, that is, 30.9.2006 till the disposal of the main petition. Mr.Shastry, learned counsel for the petitioner assailed the order solely on the ground that the Family Court could not have passed this order in the face of disposal of the interim application at Exhibit-2 in terms of the consent terms vide order dated 27.6.2007. Respondent No.1 has filed a reply affidavit stating the circumstances against which the Family Court was forced to pass the :2: :2: :2: impugned order. I perused the affidavit and more particularly paragraphs 2 and 3 thereof. By the interim order a maintenance only to the minor children has been granted by the Family Court for the reasons stated therein. In my opinion, substantial justice has been done. I am satisfied that the impugned order warrants no interference by this court in the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In the circumstances this writ petition is dismissed. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)