1 APPLN-932.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.932 OF 2011 The State of Maharashtra .... Applicant Vs. Dinesh Harishchandra Jadhav & Ors. .... Respondents Smt. S.V. Sonawane, APP, for the Applicant. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: DECEMBER 14, 2011 P.C: This is an application for leave to file appeal against acquittal of the respondents by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Vasai of the offences punishable under Sections 342, 323 and 504 r/w Section 34 of the IPC. The first informant complained that he and his sons were beaten up inside the house after closing the door because the first informant had asked accused No.3 Dilip Mohite as to why Dilip was taking his daughter-in-law Yamunabai out. Yamunabai's husband Ramesh had died some time ago. Yamumabai's sister is married to Dilip. The allegation was that, the 2 APPLN-932.11 property left by Yamunabai's husband was being squandered away by the first informant. The learned Magistrate found, upon appreciation of evidence of the witnesses, that the evidence was unreliable. First, because the incident occurred in a society where there were several houses and no independent witness was examined and secondly, there were lot of contradictions in the evidence of the interested witnesses tendered. The learned APP made available for my perusal copies of depositions of the witnesses and submits that there are no contradictions. It does not appear to be so. Even the first informant's evidence is riddled with contradictions. The view taken by the learned Magistrate cannot be said to be perverse or improbable. Leave refused. Appeal dismissed. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)