1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 1464/2009 (Arjun Hulhule Vs. Anna Wamanrao Chunade) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : JUNE 10 , 2009 . Heard Shri Jaiswal for the petitioner. Perused the impugned order dated 3/2/2009 as also the Roznama which is now placed on record. It appears from the perusal of the same that the trial Court had granted adjournment at the request of the petitioner and his counsel on a number of occasions. Since the application Exh. 67 was not supported by a Medical Certificate or an affidavit, and since the Court had granted adjournments at the request of the petitioner on a number of occasions, the Court rightly found that the petitioner was trying to prolong the matter. In these circumstances, it cannot be said that the trial Court was not justified in rejecting the application filed by the petitioner at Exh. 67 seeking permission to issue summons to the witness. The impugned order passed by the trial Court is just and proper and calls for no interference in exercise of the extraordinary writ jurisdiction. Petition fails and is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE RMP