IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25885 of 2008 SHYAM SUNDER PRASAD @ SHYAM SUNDER SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.07.08. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 517 of 2007, registered under Sections 498 A, 323, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that on perusal of the complaint petition, it would appear that there is no specific allegation against this petitioner. It is further submitted that Dewar and Gotini of the complainant have been allowed anticipatory bail which would be evident from the order of the learned Sessions Judge. Learned counsel on behalf of complainant has appeared and opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail of the petitioner. However, he submits that the petitioner may allow the complainant to live in the house from where she was driven out. Considering the above submissions and on perusal of the allegations made in the complaint as well as averments made in the petition, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, namely, Shyam Sunder Prasad @ Shyam Sunder Singh, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in connection with Complaint Case No. 517/2007, subject to 2 the conditions as laid down under Sub Section 2 of Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure. It is further observed that in case the complainant desires to live in her in-laws place, she may live there. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in case the complainant wants to stay in her in-laws place, he will not have no objection. M. Pal. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)