IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 13TH MAY 2011 / 23RD VAISAKHA 1933 WP(C).No. 13450 of 2011(E) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- P.ATTAKOYA, S/O MOHAMMED HAJI, AGED 47 YEARS, PALLOM HOUSE, KADAMATH,UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP NOW WORKING AS STAFF CAR DRIVER, SPORTS(SOCIETY FOR PROMOTION OF NATURE TOURISM & SPORTS), KADAMATH ISLAND, UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.KRISHNAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP, REP. BY ADMINISTRATOR, KAVARATTI-682555. 2. MANAGING DIRECTOR, SPORTS,(SOCIETY FOR PROMOTION OF NATURE TOURISM & SPORTS)KAVARATTI, UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP-682555. 3. GENERAL MANAGER, SPORTS, (SOCIETY FOR PROMOTION OF NATURE TOURISM & SPORTS) KAVARATTI, UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP-682555. 4. ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, SPORTS, (SOCIETY FOR PROMOTION OF NATURE TOURISM & SPORTS) KADAMATH, UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP-682556. 5. ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, SPORTS, (SOCIETY FOR PROMOTION OF NATURE TOURISM & SPORTS) MINICOY, UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP-682553. 6. SHRI MUTHUKOYA, STAFF CAR DRIVER, SPORTS(SOCIETY FOR PROMOTION OF NATURE TOURISM & SPORTS), HEADQUARTERS, KAVARATTI,UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP.(SUBSTITUTE FOR THE APPLICANT AT KADAMATH)682555. R1-5 BY ADV. SRI.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,SC,LAKSHADWEEP ADMN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No.13450 OF 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 13th day of May, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is working as a staff car driver of Society for Promotion of Nature Tourism & Sports unit at Kadamath. This writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P1 order of transfer. Various contentions have been raised in this writ petition to assail the same. When this matter is taken up for consideration today, after arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the first respondent may be directed to consider Ext.P2 representation expeditiously. Evidently, Ext.P2 would reveal that the petitioner has already taken up all his contentions and raised his grievances against Ext.P1 in Ext.P2. In the said circumstances, without making any observation as to the merits of the contentions raised in Ext.P2 as also in this writ petition, it is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider Ext.P2 and pass orders thereon expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. Sd/- (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge