IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 10TH JANUARY 2008 / 20TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 37623 of 2007(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- KRISHNAKUMAR, PULIKKALTHODI HOUSE, S.R.K.NAGAR, OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD. 3. SRI.V.SELVAM, S/O.UNNIKRISHNAN, UPPATH HOUSE, MALLISERIPARAMBU SHORANUR. 4. SRI.HAMSA, KARUVANKUZHIYIL HOUSE, THRITHALA P.O., OTTAPPALAM,. 5. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLANTE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 37623 OF 2007 D ===================== Dated this the 10th day of January, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that in a timing conference that was held for revising the timings of the 4th respondent, while effecting revision, the 3rd respondent's timing also has been revised to the prejudice of the petitioner. An objection was filed and that was rejected by Ext.P4. Against Ext.P4, revision was filed by Ext.P5 and that was also rejected by Ext.P6 and it is challenging Exts. P4 and P6 this writ petition has been filed. 2. The only objection that is raised before me is that while issuing Ext.P2 revised timings of the 4th respondent, 3rd respondent's time of departure from Ottappalam at 8.12 a.m has been changed as 8.22 a.m. Admittedly, as per Ext.P1 timing of the petitioner, the petitioner's departure time is 8.30 from WPC 37623/07 :2 : Ottappalam. If that be so, there is no direct clash and in view of this, there cannot be any sustainable objection to Exts.P4 and P6. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp