IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9748 of 2002 KUNDAN BHARTI, son of Late Tej Narain Singh, resident of Village Khanpur English, PS Sultanganj, District Bhagalpur …………………….. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Agriculture Department, New Secretariat, Vikash Bhawan, Patna 2. District Magistrate –cum- Collector, Bhagalpur, District Bhagalpur …Respondents ----------- 4. 20.02.2009 Heard leaned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The issue relates to an advertisement for appointment on the post of Village Level Worker and Village Extension Worker under the Rules framed for the same in 1987 and an advertisement in pursuance thereof leading to the preparation of a select list. The matter traveled to the High Court and the Apex Court and the selection came in for scrutiny. Directions were issued to proceed afresh by the Supreme Court when the respondents sought to make the fresh selection on basis of criteria other than that originally fixed. This did not find favour with this Court in an order dated 13.8.2007 in CWJC No. 15681 of 2005 at Annexure 14 to the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner on 10.4.2008. Learned Counsel for the State very fairly submits that the controversy for adjudication in this case stands fully covered by the aforesaid order in CWJC No. 15681 of 2005. In view of the fairness in stand on the part of respondents, this Court is not required to pass any full detailed orders and simply observes that this writ application is disposed off in terms of the reasons contained in the order dated 13.8.2007 in CWJC No. 15681 of 2005 with directions to the respondents to act accordingly within the time frame fixed therein. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)