In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … COCP No. 844 of 2008(O&M) Date of decision: August 25, 2009 Karaj Singh and others ..Petitioners Versus Gursewak Singh and others ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. B.S.Sidhu, Advocate for respondent No.6 ,,, Rakesh Kumar Garg, J(Oral) In this contempt petition, the petitioner has raised the grievance that respondents have disobeyed the order dated 8.12.2005 passed by the Civil Judge(Junior Division), Ferozepur wherein petitioner was the plaintiff and defendant-respondents were restrained from interfering in the possession of suit land and further restrained from alienating the suit land in any manner. Admittedly, the aforesaid order was passed by the trial Court subject to the compliance of Order 39 Rule 3 C.P.C. There is nothing on record to show that what happened after this order was passed in the application filed by the petitioner. Even otherwise, if there is any violation of the interim order granted by the trial Court, the petitioner has a remedy under Order 39 Rule 2A of CPC. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to proceed further with this contempt petition. Rule discharged. August 25, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE