( 1 ) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 8790 OF 2010 (Rajendra s/o. Baburao Sirsath & another Vs. The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Department of Energy, and 3 others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................. Mr. Sudhir K. Chavan, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. K.G. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.1. .............................................................................. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 13TH OCTOBER 2010 1. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the petition so as to take recourse to alternate remedy available in law. Liberty granted. 2. The petition is disposed of, as withdrawn. However, it is made clear ( 2 ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders that if there is delay in filing the proceedings for availing the alternate remedy, the petitioner would be entitled to benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, for the period during which the petitioner was prosecuting the present petition. ( A.A. SAYED ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE bgp/wp8790