[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION W.P.NO.1648 OF 2005 M/s.Swastik Heavy Structurals Pvt. Ltd. ..Petitioner Vs. Municipal Corporation of Gr.Mumbai and Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.Aniruddha Joshi i/b M.K.Nesari Advocate for Petitoner Ms.T.Puranik Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 ... CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : JULY 13, 2006 DATE : JULY 13, 2006 DATE : JULY 13, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Against the proposal to revise rateable value, petitioner has filed complaint and that complaint is pending before the Estate Officer. Considering that, the present petition can be disposed of by issuing following directions:- i) In the event of Estate Officer disposing of the matter, it will be open to the Respondents to issue the Bill in terms of decision arrived at by the Estate Officer. ii) Till the Estate Officer takes such decision, Respondents not to act on such bill. [-2-] iii) If the Petitioner is aggrieved by the decision, it will be open to him to approach appropriate authority. iv) Petition is disposed of. [ F.I.REBELLO, J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]