IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD SEPTEMBER 2008 / 12TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 23724 of 2008(Y) PETITIONER: C.SINDHU, W/O.S.VENUGOPAL, PULAMADATHIL MATTOM NORTH, THATTARAMBALAM.P.O. MAVELIKARA 3 (HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (MALAYALAM) DEVASWOM BOARD HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PARUMALA. BY ADV. SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND RESPONDENTS: 1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 3. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KUTTANADU AT RAMANKERI. 4. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIINAL OFFICER, KANJIRAPPALLY. 5. CORPORATE MANAGER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD SCHOOLS/SECRETARY, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, DEVASWOM BUILDING, NANDHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.A.J.VARGHESE R5 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.K.N.VENUGOPALA PANICKER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 23724 OF 2008 Y -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd September, 2008 JUDGMENT The grievance voiced by the petitioner is that in spite of Ext.P5 order passed by the Government, the fifth respondent has not complied with the same. In Ext.P5, the Government issued the following directions: “In the circumstances Government are pleased to order that the appointment of the petitioner as HSA (Mal.) under the management will be approved continuously from 6.6.2002 onwards with notional seniority over those two teachers who were appointed during 6/2002 in the retirement vacancies. It is also ordered that, since the management is responsible for overlooking the petitioners preferential claim for reappointment as HSA the management will make good the losses occurred to the petitioner, if she presses for it. The Exhibit P10 revision petition is disposed of accordingly.” 2. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the fifth respondent submitted that proceedings have been initiated to comply with Ext.P5 and that two more weeks' time is required to finalise the same. The above submission is recorded and the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the fifth respondent to comply with Ext.P5, as expeditiously as possible and, at any rate, within a period of two weeks. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/