1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8138/2008. Mohd.Arsad. VERSUS Jahiruddin. 06.02.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Rajeev Surana, for the petitioner. ***** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned orders. The two courts below while determining the provisional rent has held that the rent was due w.e.f. the year 1999 and not from the year 2002, as claimed by the petitioner. These findings given in the proceedings under Section 6 of the Rent Control Act with regard to the provisional determination of rent are subject to the final adjudication in the suit for eviction, arrears of rent and determination of rent which is still pending and which is liable to be decided on the basis of the evidence recorded by the parties. So far as the evidence given by the two courts below under Section 6 of the Act are concerned, they cannot be said to be conclusive. 2 This court in the writ jurisdiction cannot re- appreciate the matter with regard to the findings given by the learned courts below and reverse the same. In the facts and circumstances, this writ petition stands dismissed summarily. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.