IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4115 OF 2004 Shri.Shivaji Dhondiram Sule ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.R.V.More for Applicant. Mr.D.R.More, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. OCTOBER 21, 2004. OCTOBER 21, 2004. OCTOBER 21, 2004. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. 2. According to the Applicant, the Applicant is arrested on suspicion, mainly because of the statement of Ravindra Joshi that the victim was lastly seen in the company of accused persons, including the Applicant herein. : 2 : 3. It is argued that if that is the only evidence, the Applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. Learned A.P.P., however, submits that besides the statement of Ravindra Joshi, there are other circumstances implicating the Applicant, which can be culled out from the record. He further points out that the investigation is still in progress and as per his instructions, the charge-sheet will be filed not later than two weeks from today. 4. Taking overall view of the matter, I see no reason to interfere at this stage. It will be open to the Applicant to approach the Sessions Court by filing fresh Application after the charge-sheet is laid by the investigating agency. 5. Application disposed of on the above terms. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.