-^- J±l^jl^t?^Mk 9ZZ ^^J£^J^^t^KfebJlb ^ (OltO^l) ^Rb^^ 'Mtk ^B^ '^.b^h In^l^JK !eh l±M^&^J^ ^M^ 'cbl^lhL^ Z (OltOa) >^^> 'kbk-^^-^-^ 'MJA^ IlSi^J. J22l P^ 'bbjl^ - IM9 '^l^ll^ pi^^ip^xn •[. .^^-^ ".,^ ...^ ...,.•<^^-^ x^^y %^ Inli.^lbM.^C^ (o^'o^a) ^^ip|9j 'RJJlUS i±^'^lrk M^cy^^l^ ^MJlJ^ '^J?. SS Ithh^. Ji£^ '^fct ^I^K ^^ ^f OM 011& ^b. ^l^l^ bbjl-^ IMS '(OlLOQ) ><hW^ 'Pjy^ InlSi^ ^M^ ptbltfchjlb OIOS/ ^^ 'ONOj'd'A (Olt.OB) £ld^^&^mi^ bl^lhlh^ jsaj^ t^ljlh Sb^ ~^-^\ ^-Z3 ^» HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ff WRIT PETiTION fC) No. 3830 of 2010 PETJTiONER : Suraj Shikshan Samiti, Bilaspur. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & another. WRiT PETiTION UNDER ARTiCLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTJON OF INDiA SB: Hon'b!e Shri Satlsh K. Aanihotrj. J. Present: Shri C.K-Kesharwani, Advocate for the petltioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Pane! Lawyer for the State/respondents. (Passed on 26th day of Juiy, 2010) 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks to chailenge the communication dated 26.05.2010 (Annexure P/1) and the M.Ed. Admjssjon Rules, enclosed with the said communication wherein three different institutions narneiy Shashkiya Shiksha Mahavidyalaya, Raipur, Unnat Adhyayan Shiksha Sansthan, Bilaspur and Kaiyan Mahavidyalaya, Sector 6, Bhilalnagar have been directed to begin the course w.e.fOI .07.2010. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner draws attention of the Court to page No. 8 of the papers, wherein the name of the petitioner-institute do not finds place. On query asto whether the petitioner has approached the Dlrector, State Councii for Education Research & Tralning, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, for contjnuation of the seats of M.Ed course ailotted to the petitioner-institute, Shri Kesharwani categorically states that it is not necessary to approach the authorlties. e^'^r,,\ \^J/ -'^^^^rl L -Z- 3. On perusai ofthe communjcation dated 26.05.2001 (Annexure P/1), it is clear that the same is addressed to the Principai, Shashkiya Shiksha MahavidyaSaya, Raipur, Unnat Adhyayan Shiksha Sansthan, Biiaspur and Kalyan Mahavidyaiaya, Sector 6, Bhiiainagar, and not to the petitioner. There is also no document on record which shows that the petitioner has been restrained from running IVi.Ed. course. The petitioner Irnpugns the communjcation dated 26.05.2010 (Annexure P/1) issued bythe Director, SCERT, to the Princjpa!, Shashkiya Shiksha Mahavidyalaya, Raipur, Unnat Adhyayan Shiksha Sansthan, Bilaspur and Kaiyan MahavidyaSaya, Sector 6, Bhilainagar, wherein there is no adverse order against the pet'itioner-snstltute. The abovestated communication cannot be quashed at the instance of the petitioner without impleading Shashkiya Shiksha Mahavidyalaya, Raipur, Unnat Adhyayan Shiksha Sansthan, Biiaspur and Kalyan Mahavidyalaya, Sector 6, Bhijalnagar as necessary parties. 4. Thus, for want of materiai facts and further that the relief sought for in this petition is vague disciosing no cause of action, no reiief can be granted to the petitioner. 5. in view of the above, the writ petition Is dismissed at the motion stage itseif. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Aiiiit