IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9422 of 2011 MD. TANVIR ALAM @ GUDDU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 11.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 341, 323, 324, 307 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner to have given Farsa blow to the informant. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cognizance has been taken in the year 2011. It is further submitted that the other accused persons have been granted bail by the learned court below itself. Considering the fact that the F.I.R. was instituted in 2003. on that ground alone, this Court is not inclined to interfere. Let the learned court below pass an appropriate order while considering the regular bail application of the petitioner keeping in view that there is no accusation of repetition of blow and cognizance has been taken in the matter after 8 years of 2 the occurrence. With above observation, the application is disposed off in connection with Bisfi (Patuna) P.S. Case No. 94 of 2003 pending in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani. Let the order be transmitted to the learned court below through FAX at the cost of petitioner. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)