BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 63% WP[C1 N ............ / Petitioners: Shiv Prasad, S / o ‘Awadh Ram, Aged about 4O years, R/ o’ Kurraha Sarangarh (Tah) Raigarh Dist, CG State. Vs Respondents: 1. State of C.G. Through: Secretary, Deptt of Panchayat 85 Rural Development, Govt. of C.G., DKS Bhawan, Raipur. CG State. 2. District Collector, Raigarh, Raigarh Dist, CG State. 3 Dy Director, Panchayat 85 Soc1a1 Welfare, Ralgarh Ralgarh Dist, CG State WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITSIS] ORDERISI DIRECTION[S] ETC Hi'QH €GQRT QF 9HHAT§SGARH AT EILASPUR @ WPIé‘T PETE§$N g‘S} MG. $359 GF 2§g9 E Preiitiemer Shiv Prassd Versus State‘ of C.G & Othem WRH' PETiTiON UNDER ARNCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION CF :NDIA {$3 : wmsbie Mia Satiség K. Agnihom, J”) OREER IGRAL) (Passed on 23m day tn” Qctober, 2010) Learned cau‘nsei appearing far the petitioner, submits that wiih the passage 0f time; ihe petiiisn has become infructuous. Learned counsel p)a above submissien. appearing for ether side does ‘ 310% .‘i contraven‘ the in View of the abov become infrucfuous‘ E p) e, me writ petition is dismissed as having ‘ ' Sd/- ‘ a‘w‘ : Satish K. Agnihmri L e Judg \ i > y ‘il ;1