IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30420 of 2009 RAJU KUMAR @ AMAR RAJESH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 02/09/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a police case under Section- 379 of I.P.C. on allegations of theft of a parked motorcycle. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that of the two other cases in his antecedents one more relates to a motorcycle theft. He is not in a position to inform the Court about the next case. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Ara in Ara Nawada P.S. Case No.157/09. Both his sureties must be his mother and father respectively whose photographs and proof of residence must be appended to the bail-bonds. In the event of the petitioner failing to appear in the trial or to be property represented, the court below shall be at liberty not only to proceed 2 against the petitioner appropriately, but also the bailors also if the circumstances so warrant. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)