1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 7703/2010 Vidhya Ram Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 25.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Manoj Avasthi - for the petitioner Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per allegations in the FIR, age of accused persons are between 30 to 35 years, whereas, age of petitioner is 72 years as per medical report and 60 years as per prosecution. He has been arrested in this case since he is father of accused Mukesh Thakur, who is facing trial and was taken away from police custody. Other than this petitioner is no where involved. His two sons Suresh and Davendra are also behind bars. So far as petitioner is concerned, has has been falsely implicated in the matter. Looking to the aforesaid, petitioner may be granted bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 2 After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and it is directed that accused-petitioner namely; Vidhya Ram may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 225/2009 registered at Police Station – Saipau for offence under Section/s 332, 353, 395, 397, 307, 224, 216A IPC and section 11 of the Rajasthan Dacoit Affected Area Act provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma