IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39543 of 2006 1. Kashi Nath Mishra, Son of Sri Laxaman Mishra. 2. Laxman Mishra, Son of Krishna Bihari Mishra. 3. Smt. Nagwanti Devi, Wife of Laxman Mishra. 4. Bibha Mishra, Daughter of Laxaman Mishra. 5. Paras Nath Mishra, Son of Laxaman Mishra. 6. Ajay Kumar Mishra, Son of Laxaman Mishra. All about 1-6 resident of Village N.9/61-4 Pateeya, P.O. Bajaradiha, P.S. Bhelupur, District Varanasi (U.P.) at present 6/2 H-7A, Indira Nagar, Chintaypur, P.S. Lanka, District Varanasi (U.P.). --------- Petitioners Versus 1. State of Bihar. 2. Smt. Kiran Mishra, Wife of Kashi Nath Mishra, Daughter of Lalan Tiwary, at present Saket Puri Bazar Samittee, P.O. Mahendru, P.S. Sultanganj, District Patna, Bihar. -------- Opp. Parties ----------- 19 19.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the opposite party no.2. In view of the fact that this Court has already not found favour in the case for quashing of offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner no.1, the husband and there are materials in the case diary to also show the involvement of the petitioner nos. 3 to 6 (petitioner no.2 since dead), this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order taking cognizance. The trial court is directed to ensure that the trial of this case itself is concluded within a period of one year from the 2 date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. At this stage, counsel for the petitioners has submitted that at least the petitioner nos. 3 to 6 be given this much of liberty to raise all the questions raised herein at the time of framing of charge. Counsel for the opposite party no.2 would seriously object to it but then the requirement of law itself is that if any accused raised such questions at the time of framing of charge, that has to be gone into. That being so, this application is dismissed with the aforementioned observations. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)