IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.820 of 2007 NARENDRA KUMAR SINGH'NEELAM' Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 24.9.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is the father of the deceased , Vidya Sagar “Neelam” who died in the Station premises of Mohiuddin Nagar, Samastipur, on 25.8.2006. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he had approached Mohiuddin Nagar Rail Police officials , S.P., D.M. for lodging an F.I.R.and making enquiry about the incident. But still none has paid any heed to his representation and nor any case has been filed .He has even filed representation before S.P., Rail, Samastipur Division. Learned counsel for the State files counter affidavit on behalf of the respondents no.4 and 9, namely, S.P., Samastipur and the Officer-in-Charge, Patori P.S., Samastipur. From para 13 of the counter affidavit it appears that on the basis of the representation filed by the petitioner, an enquiry was done, as contained in Annexure-A, wherein allegation of murder has been found to be incorrect. Learned counsel for the State submits that it would appear from writ application itself that on receipt of letter of the Assistant Secretary, Chief Minister, Secretariat, respondent no.4 got made an enquiry of the case of death of petitioner’s, son Dablu Kumar. 2 In course of investigation it has come that the deceased was mentally retarded and while trying to catch a good’s train he collided and died. Learned State counsel also submits that the petitioner may represent to S.P.Rail, Samastipur for his grievances. The petitioner is at liberty to file a representation before the S.P.Rail, Samastipur, who would have the same enquired and if necessary take appropriate measures. With the aforesaid observation this writ application is disposed of. Anilksinha (Samarendra Prat ap Singh,J.)