Crl. Rev. No.2447 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.2447 of 2009 Date of Decision : 4th October, 2011 Darshan Kaur .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & another .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL. Present: None. * * * * L.N.MITTAL, J. (ORAL) None is appearing for the petitioner in spite of last opportunity granted for today. File perused. Learned trial Judge assigned cogent reasons to acquit respondent No.2-accused. Evidence led by prosecution as well as accused has been analyzed by the trial Judge in proper perspective. Self- serving statement of complainant-petitioner has not been corroborated by any other evidence. On the other hand, accused led defence evidence to discredit the prosecution case. Moreover, in case of judgment of acquittal, the presumption of innocence gets doubly strengthened. Impugned judgment of acquittal does not suffer from any perversity or illegality so as to call for interference in exercise of revisional jurisdiction. On the other hand, even if two views are possible, the view fafourable to the accused is accepted. In the instant case, view taken by Crl. Rev. No.2447 of 2009 -2- the trial Judge to acquit the accused is reasonable view of the evidence which cannot be faulted with in exercise of revisional jurisdiction. The revision petition is devoid of merit and is accordingly dismissed in limine. ( L. N. MITTAL ) JUDGE 4th October, 2011 'raj'