IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.23 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.238 OF 2008 Shri Ratanshi Ugamshi Satra & Anr. ...Petitioners V/s. Municipal Corporation of Gr.Bombay & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.G.V.Murti i/b Murti & Associates for Petitioners. Ms.Archana Joshi for Respondents 1 to 3. Mr.Shekhar Ingawale, A.G.P. for Respondent No.4. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH 13, 2008. MARCH 13, 2008. MARCH 13, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the Petitioners. 2. In my view, the stand taken in Paragraph 12 of this Review Petition is clearly afterthought contention. The material on the basis of which the Authority proceeded to decide the matter against the Petitioners was very much available to the : 2 : Petitioners at the relevant time and could have been produced and relied upon if they so desired. 3. Although the Petition is noted as disposed of in terms of order dated 7th February 2008, however, that order was invited by the Petitioners, as the Petitioners requested the Court not to record any reasons and instead give liberty to the Petitioners to approach the appropriate Authority for pursuing request for regularisation of the disputed structures. It is not in dispute that the Petitioners have already resorted to remedy of regularisation. The same will be considered on its own merits. In my opinion, no case for review is made out. Dismissed. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.