IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.11102 of 2010 Date of Decision.21.07.2011 Ram Kumar son of Sh. Des Raj, resident of Puneet Nagar, Ludhiana, District Ludhiana .....Petitioner Versus Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs, North Block, New Delhi and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. R.S. Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Kaushik, Advocate for Ms. Ranjana Shahi, Advocate for UOI. Mr. R.S. Bhatia, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 to 5. None for other respondents. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Both the learned counsel represent that by way of compromise the amount has been paid and the account has been wholly settled. No further relief is necessary. 2. The writ petition is dismissed as having been settled between the parties. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 21, 2011 Pankaj*