IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 16324 of 2008. Decided on: 5th July, 2010. Shyam Rattan Dixit. ……..Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & ors. ……..Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner : None. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG and Mr.J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “(i) That the act of the respondent State in making the H.P. civil Services Contributory Pension Rules, 2006 applicable with restrospective effect w.e.f. 15.5.2003 may kindly be declared illegal, arbitrary, contrary, ultra virus, unconstitutional, unreasonable, unwarranted and unsustainable in the eyes of law and the cut off date of 15.5.2003 fixed by the respondent State for implementation of above mentioned Rules of 2006 may kindly be quashed. (ii) That the applicant may kindly be held to be governed by the provisions of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 and consequently the applicant may be held to retain and continue with his G.P. F. No.HPPWD-32186 allotted to him by the respondents in March, 2004.” 2. In the instruction dated 16.4.2010 furnished by the learned Deputy Advocate General from the Senior Hydrogeologist, Ground Water Organisation, IPH 2 Department, Una, which is taken on record, it is stated as follows: “In this connection, it is submitted that in view of instructions contained in Secy. (IPH) to the Govt. of H.P. Notification No.IPH (A)2(B)1-2/2008 dated 28.2.2008, received in this office vide Superintending Engineer, IPH Circle Una letter No.SE.IPHU-EA- III/WC-5/Vol-42/2007/10657-61 dated 12.3.2008 (photo copy enclosed). The petitioner now has been regularized from the retrospective date on completion of 10 years daily wage service vide order No.SE IPHU/WC/Genl/Vol-42/2008-4723-29 dated 24.3.2008 w.e.f. 1.1.2002. Therefore, he is now governed by CCS (Pension) Rules and is eligible to allotment of GPF. Copy of his regularization order is enclosed. So, the relief sought for that has been granted to him and his CWP has become infructuous. The petitioner is now satisfied by the present order and as such has given direction to his advocate to withdraw the petition with a copy to this office.” 3. The writ petition is hence disposed of making it clear that in case the petitioner has still any grievance left, it will be open to him to approach the first respondent. 4. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 5th July, 2010. (Justice Kuldip Singh), (tr) Judge.