IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 1ST MARCH 2011 / 10TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(Crl.).No. 88 of 2011(S) --------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- G.SASIDHARAN PILLAI, S/O.GOPALA PILLAI, VADAKKEPOMPOZHY, CMC-XII, CHERTHALA P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVT., HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 O01. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALAPPUZHA-688 001. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHERTHALA POLICE STATION, CHERTHALA-688 524. 4. JUSTIN, S/O.PAPPU, PARAKKODU VEEDU, KANNANKARA P.O., THANNEERMUKKOM, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPUZHA-688 524. 5. PAPPU, PARAKKODU VEEDU, KANNANKARA P.O., THANNEERMUKKOM, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA-688 524. R1 TO R3 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI P.K. BABU. ADV. SRI.BOBBY JOHN FOR R4&5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(CRL).NO. 88 OF 2011 S PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 21.2.2011. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.94/P1/11/E1 DATED 21.2.2011 ISSUED FROM THE CHERTHALA POLICE STATION. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// PS TO JUDGE K.M. JOSEPH & M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(CRL).NO. 88 OF 2011 S ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 1st March, 2011 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. Petitioner is the father of the alleged detenu, his daughter. Illegal detention is alleged against respondents 4 and 5. 2. Today, the alleged detenu, the fourth respondent, the petitioner, his wife and the son of the petitioner were present and we interacted with them. The alleged detenu would say that she has married the fourth respondent in St. James Church, Paloothara. The marriage appears to be as per the Christian rites. It is also stated that there is conversion. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would state that whatever that be, the marriage may be got registered under the Special Marriage Act. Learned counsel for respondents 4 and 5 would submit that a notice under the Special Marriage Act will be W.P.(CRL).NO.88 OF 2011 S 2 given and the marriage will be registered and the Certificate produced. We close the Writ Petition. Post the case on 06.04.2011 for production of the Marriage Certificate. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/= M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE kbk. //True Copy//