ssp 1 LPA 179 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.179 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1187 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.240 OF 2011 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.179 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1187 OF 2011 Geeta Gajanan Pagi .....Appellant versus Manisha Chintaman Thakur and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.Susheel Mhadeshwar i/by Mrs.Rajnaja Todankar, for the appellant. Mr.Gangadhar J. Sabnis, for respondent No.1. Mr.A.G.Damle, for respondent No.2. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE: 26 th JULY, 2011 P.C. 1. This appeal is preferred against an order of interim relief granted by the learned Single Judge. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant will be retiring within few years and if the matter is not heard, even though the appellant has succeeded before the Tribunal, he may not get any fruits if the petition is dismissed by the learned Single Judge. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant argued that the ssp 2 LPA 179 of 2011 learned Single Judge has not given any reasons for granting interim relief. But in our view, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court would not like to interfere with the interim order granted by the learned Single Judge. Instead, we request the learned Single Judge to dispose of the writ petition as early as possible and preferably within a period of six months from today. Learned counsel for the respondents agreed that they will cooperate with the early hearing of the petition. 3. Subject to what has been stated above, Letters Patent Appeal is disposed of. 4. In view of the disposal of the appeal, civil application No. 240 of 2011 does not survive and the same is accordingly disposed of. ( MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )