IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5867 of 2011 Kundan Kumar Singh @ Kundan Singh @ Kari Singh, S/O-Late Sadanand Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 05 18.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report and it appears from perusal of the impugned order as well as submissions of the parties that the name of this petitioner surfaced in this case after recovery of the victims and the victims disclosed this fact that they had heard the name of petitioner in conversation of their kidnappers. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even if, the aforesaid statement of the victims assumed to be true, then also, there is nothing on the entire case diary to show this fact that the name of petitioner had surfaced in the conversation of the kidnappers because the Investigating Officer could not succeed to connect the petitioner with the above stated conversation. It is further contended by him that the petitioner was taken into custody in connection with another case and while he was facing trial in the aforesaid case, he was roped by the Investigating Officer in the present case. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner has not been mentioned in the entire case diary. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as 2 well as submissions of the parties coupled with this aspect of the matter that having similar allegation, co-accused persons have already been granted privilege of bail by another Bench of this Court in the year 2001, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Bhagwan Pur P.S. Case No. 91 of 2001. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)