1N THE HIGH COURI‘ OF CHHA’I‘I‘I3GAKH : BILASPUR Writ P6t1tion (C! No. O47 1 of 2008 (Writ Petition Under Article 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shn‘ Satish K, Agnihotn‘ J.) Mr. Anoop IVlajumdar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A. S. Kachwana, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Bhaskar Pyasi, Panel Lawver for the respondents No. l and z E R e a (Passed on this of Februaiy, 2009) With the consent of leained counsel appearing for the parties the matter is heard tinally. Mr. A. S. kachwaha, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 1 and 2 submits that the petitioner has already been paid compensation and the petitioner would be allotted a plot as a measure of rehabilitation wherever other similarly situated shop owners have been rehabilitated. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that no compensation has been paid to the petitioner. If the compensation has not been paid, the same shall be paid to the petitioner, in accordance with law. Since the Municipal Corporation has already decided to allot shop to the petitioner in the area wherever other similarly situated shop owners have been rehabilitated, homing survives in this matter. The petitioner may apply for grant of compensation and allotment of shop, n so advised. 1n View 01" the tolegoing, this petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge - Thakur Sdl- Petitioner Jagannatn Gupta, S/o Mangai Sao Gupta, agsd about 67 yams, Ric Sadar. Bazar, Kawardha, Distn'ct- Kabirdham (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through ihe Secrstary Urban Welfam Departm€nt, nKq Bhawan: Manhaiaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief Executive' Officer, Municipal Council, Kawardha, Distn'ct — Kabirdham (C.G.)