IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.23902-CII of 2011 and CR No.940 of 2006 Date of decision: 29.9.2011 Sito Devi and another ......Petitioner(s) Versus State Bank of Patiala and others ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: None. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) This is landlords' revision petition challenging the impugned orders of the Authorities below whereby their application for ejectment of the respondents from the demised premises was dismissed. CM No.23902-CII of 2011 has been filed by Mr. H.N. Mehtani, Advocate, who is not present in Court. In this application, a prayer has been made on behalf of the respondent-Bank to state that the instant revision petition has become infructuous as the demised premises have been vacated by the applicant-respondents and the vacant possession has been delivered to the petitioner-landlord. This application is supported by an affidavit of Sh. Surinderjit Singh Dua, Chief Manager, Lead Bank Office, State Bank of Patiala, Mansa. In view of the aforesaid prayer made in the application, which is supported by an affidavit, the prayer is allowed and the instant revision petition is ordered to be dismissed as having become infructuous on the ground that vacant possession of the demised premises has been delivered to the petitioner-landlord by the respondent-Bank as averred in this application. September 29, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE