IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 22ND MAGHA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 80 of 2010(S) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.11598/2008 Dated 20/11/2008 .................... PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- C.K.JAYAPRAKASH, S/O. SUMUGHAN, AGED 61, ASSISTANT ENGINEER, (RETD) OMKAR, MANANTHAVADY, WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.K.RAJESH SUKUMARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- C.UMMAR, (FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) AGED 54, RESIDING AT KALPATTA, NOW WORKING AS ASSISTANT TREASURY OFFICER, DISTRICT TREASURY, KALPPATTA NORTH, WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. REMANI THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ---------------------------- Cont. Case (C)No.80 of 2010 ---------------------------- Dated 11th February, 2010 JUDGMENT This contempt case is filed on the ground that the respondent has made imputations against this Court in Annexure A3 letter as follows: “But you have filed writ W.P.(c)No.11598/2008 before the Hon: High Court of Kerala and some how you have manage to get order in favour of you in the said writ petition.” The respondent has filed an affidavit expressing unconditional apology for stating in Annexure A3 that the petitioner in the writ petition has somehow managed to get an order in his favour from this Court. In the light of the said affidavit, I am of the opinion that no further orders are called for in this contempt case. It is accordingly closed. P.N.RAVINDRAN Judge TKS