wp770-11.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.770 OF 2011 Mr.Vilas Kadu Tayde & Ors .. Petitioners versus Kurla Jaihind Buddha Vilas (SRA) .. Respondents Ms.Nutan S. Moily for the petitioner. None for the respondents. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 20th JUNE 2011. P.C.: 1] The orders under challenge are interlocutory. There is no reason to interfere with the prima facie and tentative findings of the Courts below that the petitioner who is original opponent No.1 cannot be allowed to interfere with the working of the society and there cannot be a parallel managing committee. Essentially these are tentative and prima facie findings. The petitioner is not in any way prejudiced because the final orders on the dispute are still not passed. The petitioner can convince the trial court by leading oral and documentary evidence that he was validly elected and, therefore, could have functioned as office bearer. All contentions in that behalf are kept open. Subject to the same, the petition is dismissed. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)