IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5198 of 2010 SRIMATI RITA BHAGAT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 26.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned for the State. Petitioner claimed himself to be a resident of the locality in which the respondent no.6 is running a Video Hall illegally. According to the petitioner respondent no.6, namely, Shambhu Prasad Gupta had a valid license to run a Video hall in the name of Mahadeo Talkies but in the garb of such license or permission he is running yet another Video hall in the name of Krishna Video Hall. This according to the petitioner is illegal. Petitioner has raised these issues before the licensing authority but the licensing authority has not acted upon his representation. These are matters which require to be investigated and looked into by the licensing authority whether the so called Video Hall is running in the name of Kirshna Video Hall without any valid license. It is for the licensing authority to verify the actual fact and take action. This writ application is disposed of with a direction upon the District Magistrate, Saharsa that he will look into the matter and pass appropriate direction with regard to the said illegal video hall. At an early clarification on the issue within a period of three months from the date of production or communication of a copy of this order would be required. This writ application is disposed of with the above direction. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)