THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA WRIT PETITION NO.15890 OF 2011 ORDER: The petitioner submitted a petition before the Collector and District Magistrate, Ongole, wherein he stated that he purchased land to an extent of Acs.3.00 from one Chandrapati Krishnavenamma through an agreement of sale but the following persons namely (1) Annamneni Nagaiah, (2) Sreenu, (3) Chintala Nagaiah, (4) Siva and (5) Bathina Symson have warned him that the land belongs to them. It has been averred that the aforesaid persons are obstructing and not allowing him to enjoy the property purchased by him. Upon receipt of the said petition, the District Collector, Ongole, vide letter dated 17.07.2009 addressed the Sub Divisional Police Officer, Ongole and the Tahsildar, Chimakurthy Mandal, to conduct necessary enquiry and take necessary steps in accordance with law. The Tahsildar of Chimakurthy Mandal also addressed a letter dated 28.03.2011 to the Station House Officer, Chimakurthy Police Station, the second respondent, to take necessary action in providing police protection to the subject properties of the petitioner. In the mean time, the petitioner filed a suit in O.S.No.300 of 2006 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ongole, and obtained injunction orders. In due obedience to the injunction orders passed by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ongole, the police summoned the persons named in the petition and bounded them over. The persons said to be creating hindrance in the enjoyment of the properties of the petitioner have given an undertaking before the police that they shall not interfere with the said properties of the petitioner. As the persons, who have been named in the complaint, have already given an undertaking that they shall not interfere with the peaceful possession of the petitioner over his properties and the fact that the petitioner has already obtained injunction order from the Civil Court, the request of the petitioner to take appropriate action on his complaint is without merit. Inasmuch as action has already been initiated by the District Collector as well the as the second respondent herein, no further direction is required to be passed in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. _____________________ (ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J) 20th June 2011 RRB