IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No.318 of 2008 With Stay Application No.2407/2008 Dilshana W/o Akhlak ………….. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand through S.S.P. Hardwar & two others ………… Respondents Sri Navneet Kaushik, learned counsel for the petitioner Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for State/Respondent Nos.1 & 2 Sri Rajendra Singh, learned counsel for the complainant/Respondent No.3 Coram: Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Dated: June 19, 2008 Heard Sri Navneet Kaushik, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State as well as Sri Rajendra Singh, learned counsel for complainant/Respondent No.3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought writ in the nature of certiorari quashing of the first information report dated 27.4.2008 lodged by Respondent No.3 registered as Case Crime No.141/2008 relating to offence punishable under Section 386/506 IPC with P.S. Kotwali Manglaur, District Hardwar. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through contents of the FIR which discloses the serious allegations, we are not inclined to interfere with the investigation of the case. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed summarily. (Stay Application No.2407/08 stands rejected) (Dharam Veer, J.) (Prafulla C.Pant, J.) 19.06.2008 Rajeev Dang