IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIsGARH AT BIL§$W5€ awmh ck.M.P. N05MI /2009 APPLICANT GD KA Ajar‘ Singh, son of Budhiya Ram, aged about 22 year‘s, Cusfe-Gond, Residenf of Village Kalipur‘, P.$. Udaipur‘, Dish‘. Surguja (CG) 'S’rafe of Chha’rTisgarh, Through *he S.H.O., P.S. Udaipur’. Disf. Surguja. APPLICATION FOR MODIFICATION/ CORRECTION OF THE ORB/ER DATED 5.5.2009 PASSED IN M.CR.C. NO.740//ZOO9 (BENCH PRESIDED OVER BV HON'BLE NON-APPLICANT: Wu/Q AEKK‘GMR C, ' WWGVMP W200 mm (Wm gamma aaw wmwz¥f§€IWR $3 : HON’ELE SHE JUSTICE EI'E‘INKER DIWAKER G’?.Q$.2Qe9 Shri Sandeep Shrivastava Shri Shashaxlk Thakur, P. The present applicatiqn )rrection in the order dated 5.5.2009 passed by this Ccurt in M.Cr.C. Contention of counsel for the applciant is that While filing the bail application before this Cou , the crime No. was mentioned as 141/2008 on the basis of order f rejection of bail by the trial Court whereas after obtaining the certi 'ied copy of the order dated 5.5.2009 (Annexure A/l) it was reveale has been filed on behalf of the applicant for modification and c< counsel for the applicant. L. far the State. before the Court below that the correct crime No. is 131/2008 of Police Station Udaipur. Further correction has been sought in th name of the applicant/accused and here again based on the bail reje tion order of the Court below, name of the applicant was mentioned s ‘Anjar Singh’ Whereas the correct name is ‘Ajar Singh’. On 31.7.2009, while admitting the present application of the appiican‘g learned counsel for t o. 740/2009. e State was directed to call for the case diary in respect of Crime hgos. 131j2008 82; 141/2008 of Police Station Udaipur, District Surgujaj‘. Counsel for the State sub l its that the case diary of Crime No. 131/2008 is available with hinii and in the year 2008, at Police Station Udaipur, crimes have bden registered only up to 138/2008 and therefore no case diary of Chime No. 141/2008 is available. l-le L§1LZQO8 is relatedtgmheappiieant further submits that Crime No. ? Gum? ”gm... » m 209 3 mwfiwsi- ammwm mm (Wu) mrt 12m 311% ”l .l Wnmawwmx mmm ted bail to him on 5.5.2009. It has isei for the State that the Correct case diary is ‘Ajar Singh’ and not only in which this Court has gran also been submitted by the com name of the applicant as per the ‘Anjar Singh’. R In View of the above facts e present application of the applic; 5.5.2009 name Qf the applicant ‘Anjar Singh’. Likewise, instead oi read as 131/2008. C.c. as per ruies. md circumstances of the case, the mt is allowed. in the order dated be read as ‘Ajar Singh’ instead of Crime No. 141/2008 the same be . Pritinker Diwaker Judge f; ‘