IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31376 of 2008 ASHUTOSH KUMAR VERMA @ ASHUTOSH, Son of Panna Lal, Proprietor M/s Maa Vaishno Seeds, resident of Mohalla-Sa, 2/398 E-6, Daulatpur, Pandeypur, P.S.-Cantt., District-Varanasi, State-Uttar Pradesh. ..............Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ..........Opp. Party. ----------- 6/ 12.08.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the O.P. and the State. As per the allegation in the complaint petition, cheque was issued by the petitioner in favour of the complainant with respect to an account which was already closed. Counsel appearing for opposite party shows the intention of the petitioner as having full knowledge about his status of the account he issued a cheque in favour of the petitioner which could not be encashed. This matter was referred for mediation after much effort of the mediator the mediation failed, both the parties continue to blame each other. Considering that intentionally the cheque was issued against closed account and also that petitioner is still not ready to deposit the money, I do not find it fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Prayer is rejected. Sanjeet (Mridula Mishra, J.)