{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3962 OF 2009 Koli Vidyadhar Basawraj PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.M.C.Kochar, Advocate for petitioner (Absent) Mr.K.B.Chaudhari, Addl.G.P. for respondents No.1 and 2 ....... [CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. and A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE : 17 th July 2009 PER COURT: 1. None for the petitioner even after third call. The dismissal of the petition in default would not serve the ends of justice, as it invariably results in moving application for restoration which creates strain on the registry. Hence, we propose to decide it on its own merits. Having gone through the petition, we found that the petition is premature since the petitioner has challenged initiation of the Departmental Enquiry which is still to be concluded. The petition is, therefore, dismissed in limine as premature with no order as to costs. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [V.C.DAGA, J.] drp/wp3962-09