IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.l479 of 2006 Dr. Vijay Apparao Kokane... petitioner vs The State of Mah and anr.. respondents Mr. A.P.Kulkarni for the petitioner Mr. S.R.Nargolkar AGP for State CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.R.KINGAOKAR JJ. V.R.KINGAOKAR JJ. V.R.KINGAOKAR JJ. DATED l6.3.2006 DATED l6.3.2006 DATED l6.3.2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard parties. . By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. With the assistance of the learned counsel for the petitioner we have scrutinised the order. The tribunal has in paras 9,l0 and ll of its order extensively dealt with the contentions raised by the petitioner before the tribunal. Then in para l3 the tribunal has categorically observed that "there are other contentions raised by the applicant in his petition. They have not been pressed before us". Therefore the other contentions raised before the tribunal but not pressed, cannot be pressed in this petition to challenge the incorrectness of the order of the tribunal. There is, therefore, no reason why the order should be interfered with. Petition is rejected. (V.G.Palshikar J) (V.R.Kingaokar J)