1 2 S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. 2nd BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3602/2009. Raja Ram Vs. The State of Rajasthan Date of Order :: 10th November 2009. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI None present for the petitioner. Mr. O.P. Singaria, Public Prosecutor. ... BY THE COURT: Nobody has chosen to appear in this second bail application though the matter has been called out twice over. Perusal of the record makes out that on 09.07.2009, the counsel for the petitioner prayed for time and the matter was adjourned for three weeks. Then, on 04.08.2009, at request, the matter was again adjourned for two weeks; and then, on 20.08.2009, for nobody appearing for the petitioner, the matter was adjourned and was taken up on 27.08.2009 but was again adjourned for another two weeks for nobody appearing for the petitioner. Thereafter, on 15.09.2009, the matter was again adjourned for another four weeks when again nobody appeared for the petitioner; and it was noticed that nobody was present for the petitioner for 3 consecutive dates of hearing. Thereafter, the matter was adjourned on 14.10.2009 when a request for adjournment was made on behalf of the counsel for the petitioner; and at request, the matter was ordered to be placed today. 2 Nobody has chosen to appear for the petitioner today despite two calls. The petitioner is accused in this matter of having in possession 62 bottles of illicit liquor. It is also noticed from the observations made in the order dated 02.05.2009 as passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Hanumangarh while rejecting the first bail application that the petitioner had been involved in the criminal cases in the past and had been convicted in the cases pertaining to FIR No. 201/2002 and 460/2002. The first bail application moved to this Court was dismissed as not pressed on 20.05.2009. In the totality of the facts and circumstances of this case as noticed above, there does not appear any justification to keep this second bail application pending any further; nor this Court is inclined to grant indulgence to the petitioner at this stage. This second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. moved on behalf of the petitioner Raja Ram S/o Bhani Ram is, therefore, rejected. However, this order shall not prejudice the right of the petitioner to apply for bail afresh in accordance with law. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. //Mohan//