{N THE hiuh buuRl CF JE-ECATUREAT u? S“UR W P IS I'o. 8 p é 4%; /20()6 / Dakar Sinnh 5. Dhurwe‘; i og/isb ‘ no a“ EB Na bg gnu tuaa'auouiuvDnaI¢OOalQ Hat/6%) A m. Shh“... lbg ?resai’a‘£€9 $aigémm. 4, Versus “LL, State of Chnamsgarh uppré on . — Schoal E qcatian IV'a“ u amya R&p‘1r W.C.) Through — District EduCaLi n KQWdr aa, LaiStrlct— Kabu‘dhw’ (can) A SECTIGN 226 ’22:? OF THE UER IGH COURT OF CHHATTI$6ARH AT BILASPUR $INGLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATI5H K. AGNIHOTRI J‘ WRIT PETITION §s) NO 6785 OF 200% Pe'fi'rioner : Dakar Singh bhurwey Responden'rs : 5mm of Chhaffisgarh and Mhers V8P5u$ Preserrr : Mr. Deepak Jain, counsel for fhe peti‘rioner. Ms. Sun'n'a Jain. Pane! lawyer for The STaTe/ respondems. ' ORDEk (Passed on This 315+ day of January, 2007) Learned counsel qnpear-ing for fhe par-fies join‘W submif +ha+ fhe fads and quesfion of law involved in flag presen'r wrl? pzfi'rion are squarely covered by fhe decision of 'ihis Court in 1'he case of ygshwanf k‘umar Bharadwaj vsl Munfcgaal tammfian, Duty and anoflmr’. For ’H-ie aforememioned reason; *rhis wrii pe‘rh‘ion is disposed of in farms of fhe decision of fhis Courf in “the ma‘ri'er of Vashwanf Kumar Bharadwaj (Supra), subjecf 'ro verification of fhe fact asfo - whe'fher The pefifioner has acquired B.T.I. Cerfificafe af his own expenses as per +he circulars dafed 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and furfher whe+her he has been paid fwo advance increments or not No order as fa cos‘rs. i Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotr Judge Bablu 1 2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96 x i i i