IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2320 of 2009 M/S ZINC PRODUCTS & COMPANY(P)LTD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 18.2.2009 Surendra/ Heard counsel for the petitioners. On the own showing of the petitioner the dispute in question being pending before the civil court in T.S.No. 407/1994, has to be decided even in respect of any threat or apprehension of dispossession by the civil court itself. The submission of the counsel for the petitioner that at present the court is vacant on account of which he cannot press his application for injunction would only merit this much of observation that if the petitioner finds himself in a helpless situation on account of the court being vacant he is always at a liberty to move the District Judge for transfer of suit to any appropriate court where the injunction matter can be heard and disposed of expeditiously. With the aforementioned observation, this application is disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)