-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.2854 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.2854 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.2854 OF 2006 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.H.V.Mehta for the Appellant CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JANUARY 11,2007. : JANUARY 11,2007. : JANUARY 11,2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Shri Mehta for the Appellant. Following substantial question of law arise for my consideration : . "Whether the Trial Judge has committed an error by holding that an Accountant, a Kandi Master, a watchman and a Mukadam engaged by the Respondent were not the employees in as much as the learned Judge has completely ignored the definition of employeee under section 2 (9) as well as the definition of wages under section 2(22) of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 ?" 2. Appeal is admitted on the aforeaid substantial question of law. Private Paperbook along with Decree Form shall be filed by the Appellant/s within a period of one year from today. If compliance is not made within stipulated time, the Appeal shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution without further reference to the court. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE