1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.828 OF 2005 Shri Yellusa Ambassa Kathare Appellant vs. The Brihan Mumbai Mahanagarpalika Respondent WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.829 OF 2005 Shri Dhanji K. Puria Appellant vs. The Brihan Mumbai Mahanagarpalika Respondent WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.832 OF 2005 Smt.Tulsi Kanojia Appellant vs. The Brihan Mumbai Mahanagarpalika Respondent WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.833 OF 2005 Shri Ramrathi M. Gupta Appellant vs. The Brihan Mumbai Mahanagarpalika Respondent WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.845 OF 2005 Shri Ashok Kumar Jain Appellant vs. The Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika Respondent AND WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.846 OF 2005 Ms.Reeta Victor Saldhana Appellant vs. The Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika Respondent Mr.D.K.Mishra for the appellant in all appeals. Ms.Geeta Joglekar for the B.M.C. in all appeals. 2 CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE,J. DATED : 29th August 2005 P.C. These appeals impugn an order passed by the City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai directing registration of notice of motion for temporary injunction and at the same time refusing the prayer for ad-interim stay. The learned counsel for the appellants now states that the subject premises have already been demolished by the respondent-Municipal Corporation and, therefore, nothing further survives in these appeals challenging the order of ad-interim relief. 2. These appeals are therefore disposed off as infructuous. However, the hearing in the pending notices of motion is expedited and they be decided on their merits preferably by 30th November 2005. (B.H. (B.H. (B.H. MARLAPALLE,J.) MARLAPALLE,J.) MARLAPALLE,J.)