: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1182 OF 2009 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1466 OF 2009 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1182 OF 2009 Chhedilal Sukhnandan Gupta Thru’ Nilesh R. Haryan, Constituted Attorney .. Appellant V/s. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Mumbai & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. Jagdish N. Jayale for the Appellant-Applicant. Smt. K.K. Soraan for Respondent No.1. Mrs. S.V. Sonavane, AGP, for Respondent No.2. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 24 TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C.: 1. The ad-interim relief sought by the appellant- applicant has been refused by the City Civil Court, Dindoshi, Bombay vide its order dated 20th November, 2009 passed in Notice of Motion in L.C. Suit No.2594 of 2009 on the ground that there is no urgency. It appears that a notice under Section 354-A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act was issued to the appellant-applicant and he has : 2 : replied to the same within 24 hours. The notice indicates that there is unauthorized construction of three rooms with B.M. walls, A.C. sheet roof. Obviously, therefore, the respondent No.1-Municipal Corporation would have to take action in accordance with law before demolishing the structure. Therefore, in my opinion, there is no need to grant any relief to the appellant-applicant. 2. The Appeal from Order is dismissed. 3. In view of the above, Civil Application No.1466 of 2009 pending in the Appeal from Order does not survive and the same is dismissed. .......