1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 5948/2007 (Vijay Sitaram Shelke Vs. State of Mah & ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : MARCH 19, 2008. Heard Mr. Chandurkar for the petitioner, Mr. Khubalkar, A.G.P., for respondent nos. 1 and 2, and Mr. G.G. Mishra for respondent no.3. Looking to prayer clause (a) of the writ petition, it will be appropriate to dispose of the petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Grievance Committee for redressal of his grievance. The counsel for the petitioner prays that directions issued by this Court, vide order dated 20/12/2007, to the respondents to keep one post of Shikshan Sevak in the project affected category vacant until further order, may be 2 continued till the Grievance Committee decides the grievance of the petitioner. In the circumstances, writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Grievance Committee for redressal of his grievance. We expect the Grievance Committee to decide the grievance of the petitioner on its own merits and according to law and procedure applicable in this regard, within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order. Till such time the interim order shall continue to operate and cease to operate automatically thereafter. JUDGE JUDGE RMP