... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1231 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1231 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1231 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1130 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1130 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1130 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri U.R.Agandsurve for the Applicant. Shri D.P.Adsule, A.P.P for the Respondent. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 30, 2006. DATE : NOVEMBER 30, 2006. DATE : NOVEMBER 30, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocate for the Applicant and the learned A.P.P for the State. The conviction of the Applicant is for offence under section 304 (Part I) of the Indian Penal Code. Looking to the seriousness of allegation against the Applicant and the nature of prosecution evidence, no case is made out for grant of bail. 2. Application is rejected. 3. Considering the fact that the Applicant is in jail for more than one year and the substantive sentence is of seven years, hearing of the Appeal is expedited. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE