IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH JULY 2010 / 19TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 19609 of 2010(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- K.M.SASINDRANUNNI, S/O.M.K.RAJA, AGED 61 YEARS, `KRISHNA KRIPA', RAJAS COLONY, MANNARKAD, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-I. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD 678001. 3. K.M.KRISHNANUNNI, S/O. ARYAN BHATATHIRIPAD, `PRAVDA', VINAYAKA COLONY, NEAR VICTORIA COLLEGE, PALAKKAD 678001. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. DILIP MOHAN FOR R1 TO R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 19609 OF 2010 -------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T In the matter of dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent regarding the management of KTM High School, Mannarkad Moopilsthanam Estate, the first respondent had conducted hearing on 20.4.2010. According to the petitioner, earlier, the second respondent found the third respondent unfit to hold the post of Manager. Challenging the said proceedings, the third respondent had earlier approached this Court by filing W.P.(C) No.13763 of 2008 on the ground that the order under challenge was passed in violation of the principles of natural justice. As per Ext.P3, the said writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondents to reconsider the issue with notice to the affected parties. It was accordingly that the first respondent conducted a hearing on 20.4.2010 with notice to all the concerned including the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that even thereafter no order has so far been passed. In the said circumstances, I do not think this Court should look into the merits of the contentions at this stage. WPC No.19609/2010 2 Taking into account the fact that the first respondent has already conducted the hearing on 20.4.2010, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to pass orders on the issue based on the hearing conducted on 20.4.2010 expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. C.T.RAVIKUMAR (JUDGE) vps WPC No.19609/2010 3 WPC No.19609/2010 4