IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 4TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 13TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 26297 of 2008(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- ERAYATH SHEREEFA, W/O ABDUL RASHEED, NO EMPLOYMENT, RAMANTHALI AMSOM, VADAKKUMBAD DESOM, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE SRI.M.M.ANTO RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VAIDYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, K.S.E.B. PAYYANNUR. 3. VEMBIRINGAN MADHAVI, PARATHIKKAD,RAMANTHALI VILLAGE, KANNUR P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. 4. P.P. BALAKRISHNA PODUVAL, S/O NARAYANA PODUVAL, THAYINERI, PAYYANNUR P.O., KANNUR DIST. 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/COLLECTOR, KANNUR DISTRICT, KANNUR. BY SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, GOVT.PLEADER SRI.BIJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 26297 OF 2008 E ==================== Dated this the 4th day of September, 2008 J U D G M E N T The complaint in this writ petition is that the respondents 1 and 2are not moving the 5th respondent for removal of the obstruction offered by respondents 3 and 4. Learned standing counsel appearing for respondents 1 and 2 submits that the application made by the petitioner for power connection itself is incomplete in as much as she had not produced ownership certificate and that she has also not made cash deposit. It is stated that once these requirements are satisfied, necessary action will be taken by respondents 1 and 2. 2. If as stated by the respondents 1 and 2, the application made by the petitioner itself is incomplete, I cannot find fault with respondents 1 and 2 in not moving the 5th respondent for removing the alleged obstruction offered by respondents 3 and 4. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing that once the petitioner complies with the requirement as above, necessary action will be taken by respondents 1 and 2. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp