1 crap345.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 345 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL ST. NO. 29 OF 2011 Udhav s/o Tukaram Sarode ...Applicant VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & anr. ...Respondents ..... Shri V.L.Dhoble, advocate for applicant Smt. Y.M.Kshirsagar, A.P.P. for respondent no.1 Shri J.M.Murkute, advocate for respondent no. 2 ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 9 th March, 2011 PER COURT : 1 Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 22 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Appeal, against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 21.10.2010, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Parbhani, in 2 crap345.11 Sessions Trial No. 58 of 2010. 3 For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily and it further appears that the delay caused in filing the accompanying appeal is not willful, deliberate and intentional and same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4 Hence, present Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 22 days caused in filing the accompanying appeal stands condoned and accompanying Criminal Appeal be registered and numbered. The present Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE), JUDGE. dbm/crap345.11