$mg£a~> 3Eench @ x ‘ w £21 (”3 N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. $W§ 3 /2QII PETITIONER («z Deendayal Bansode S/o Late Tijau Ram Bansode, Aged about 61 Years and 7 Month, working as a Head Master, Middle School, Lohrasee Block—Dhamtari, Distt— Dhamatari (C. G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Deputy Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, District— Dhamatari (C.G.). Block Education Officer, Dhamatari Distt. Dhamatari (co). RESPONDENT§ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA. B : Hon’ble Shri Manindra M 1609.2011 Shri Janak Hidko, coun el for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govern ent Advocate for the State. Heard. This petition has been iled by the petitioner aggrieved by order, dated 9/8/2011 by which, tran fer order dated 15/07/2011 passed earlier by the Collector has been can elled by the State Government. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that vide order dated 15/07/2011, the petitio er was transferred to Loharsee and he joined on 5/08/2011. The Now, the order of transfer has been cancelled. After going through th order, it is found that the order dated 15/07/2011 was passed by t e Collector without jurisdiction as the power rests in the hands of the State Government. When thts was observed by the State Gover ment, the order of the Collector ha been declared void. Though the pe itioner has suffered inconvenience as he was transferred for one pla e to other place at the fag end of his retirement, the order of the St te Government cannot be interfered with ‘ ‘ bythis Court. Taking into consideraton the extra ordinary feature that the petitioner is going to retire n January, 2012, it would be proper to direct the respondent No.1 to consider, if the petitioner could be ace where he has loined, subject to continued at the present “Wt r‘ma ~l S/l40—2/201 l-—~l ,S0,000. n S oh ‘n Shrivastava J. l anémmqarhagu) WWW WWW mmm WW‘§?§@W #affawm mm v0)@9m>§7+ct3 " 200 mm (W)