-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.910 OF 2006 Along with Civil Application No.1554 of 2006 Prem Kaliandas Daryanani, .. Appellant. (Orig.Plff) Vs Arvind Shirodkar, .. Respondent. (Orig.Deft) Mr R.M.Nakhawa i/b Mr Vasant Dhawan, for the appellant. Mr S.S.Kulkarni, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : DATE : DATE : 28/02/2007 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The learned counsel for the parties state that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and they placed the consent terms on record duly signed by the parties and their Advocates on record. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. In view of the settlement, this Second Appeal, formally, stands admitted and disposed of in terms of the consent terms. Decree be drawn in terms of the consent terms. The civil application for stay accordingly stands disposed of. 3. Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order. -2- (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)