IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM Nos. 9113-14-CII of 2011 in/and Civil Revision No. 1781 of 2011 Date of decision: April 06, 2011 Uma Sharma and another .. Petitioners Vs. Punjab National Bank .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. R.S. Bhatia, Advocate for the respondent. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) CM No. 9113-CII of 2011 Allowed as prayed for subject to all just exceptions. CM No.9114-CII of 2011 Notice of the application. Mr. R.S. Bhatia, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. For the reasons as mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the case is preponed. Learned counsel for the parties state that they are ready with the arguments. Let the main case be heard today itself. C.R. No. 1781 of 2011 This petition assails the order dated 23.2.2011 (Annexure P5) passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Karnal whereby the objection petition filed by the petitioners was dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioners has time and again stressed that the parties have compromised the matter and in terms of the compromise, they would deposit the amount with the bank. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further requested that the entire amount as Civil Revision No. 1781 of 2011 -2- settled with the bank may be deducted from leave encashment of petitioner No.1 and the remaining amount may be paid to her. In view of this statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners at bar, the trial court is directed to withdraw the amount payable to the bank from the leave encashsment and the remaining amount would be paid to the petitioner. The aforesaid order would be operative only if there is compromise between the petitioners and the bank. Disposed of accordingly. Copies of this order be given dasti under the signatures of the Court Secretary. April 06, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge