^-^'/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) No. ^o^B OF 2009, ^ PETITIONER Indraman Kumar Sahu, aged 4 1 years, S/o Late Shri Shobha Ram Sahu, U.D.T. Govt. Middle School, Kathaualy, District Dhamtari (C. G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^s^ ^" /^^19^ ^ 1) State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary School, Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C. G.) 2) District Education Officer Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (C. G.) ^"' 3) Additional Director, Directorate Public Instruction, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THJE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^i ^NK^. HiGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BIL^PUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 3078 OF 2009 PETITiONER indraman Kumar Sahu RESPQNDENTS Versus State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & Oihers QA/rit petition under ArticSe 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hofi'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Somkant Verma, counsei for the petltioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate with Ms Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDEiiJORAy (Passed on this 10^ day of September, 2009) 1. Heard learned counsei for the parties. 2. Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 2-3-2009 (Annexure - P/1) passed by the respondent No.2 by which the promotion order granted in favour of the petitioner has been canceiJed. 3. Learned counsei for the petitioner submifcs that the petitioner wants to withdraw the present petition with liberty to make a representatlon to the respondent No.1. Learned counsei, however, submits that direction may be issued for deciding the representation so made expeditiously. 4. Learned counsei for the State submits that sf a representatjon Is made by the petitioner, the same sha!i be considered and decided, by the respondent No.1, jn accordance with iaw, within a period of two months from the date of receipt ofthe same. 5. Accordingty, the writ petition Js disposed of. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge