^ //'^ ^ ;;'C!^£ ^ ^ HIGHCQURTQFCHHATnSGARH:BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 2060 of 2.005 Petitioner 2. 3. 4. 5. 2. C.G.Rajya Tritya Vai'g Karmachari Saiigh, tlirough its Block Pi'esident Education Bloc Chhuriya, district Rajnaiidgaon (C.G.) Versus Respoiideiits 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretaiy, School Educatiou Depaitiiieut, D.K.S. Bhawaii, Raipur. Tiie CoUector, District Rajnaxidgaon (C<G,) The District Educatioii Officer, Rajnandgaon (C,G.) The Block Education Officer, Block Chhuriya, District Rajnandgaon (C.G,) Shri M. C. Saliu, Accountant, O/o Block Education; Chhziriya, District Rajiiaiidgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 •& 227 OFTHE CONSTrTUTIONOFINDJA (SB: Hou'ble Shri Satish K. Agniliotri J.) Sliri R. K. F^eshenvaiu, Advocate for the petitioner, Ms Smita Ghai, Paael Lawyer for tiie respondeats No. 1 to 4, ORDBR (Passed on tliis 19th day ofJune, 2009) Learned counsel appearmg for the petitioner, on instnictions, subm.its that with the passage of tiiae this writ petition has becorae infructuous. Thus, tlie petitioner prays for withdrawal ofthe petition. Leai'ned counsel appeadng for the respondents/State has no objection. Accordmgly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, No order asto costs. Tb.al.a.u' Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge