THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.6002 OF 2006 DT.09.12.2009 Between: Syed Shah Mazaz-ul-HaqKonchada Anandarao …………..Petitioner Vs. A.P.Housing Board, represented by its Executive Engineer/Central Division, Hyderabad. …………….Respondent. O R D E R: On 02.12.2009, when the revision petition came up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal”. Despite the matter being posted to this day under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the revision petition. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. _______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY J., Dt.09.12.2009 tjs