c 5-^{ ^i •::wFis-s IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0.b.^.u^.../2006 PETITIONER The oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Malviya Nagar, Durg. .f'^ ..••^?' Through- Divisional Manager, /^^^•••" Durg(c-G-) lli-"' ^%>' ^y -rf"^ 'f (Policy issued by the Oriental Insurance Company Lunited, Jaipiir- Kamataka Main Road, Jaipur (Kamataka). VERSUS RESPONDENTS;! u\^( A /' 2. 4. y Smt. Khembai Wd/o Komal Sahu, Aged about 35 years. Ku. Bhuvneshwari D/o late K.omal Sahu, Aged about 17 years. K.U. Geeteshwari D/o Komal Sahu, Aged about 14 years. Ku. Urwashi Sahu D/o Komal Sahu, Aged about 10 years. Dilip Sahu S/o Komal Sahu, Aged about 08 years. Kliembai Widow ofKomal Sahu behalfofMinor respondent no. 2 and 3 All R/o village Bato-el, Police Station-Ranchirai, •Distt-Durg, (C.G.) .»* .6: AshrafAli S/o Abubkas, aged about 40 yrs. R/o Umarkot, P.S. - Umarkot, Distt. Navrangpur, Orissa. 7. Maaoj Kmiiar Agrawal S/o Biddi Chandra Agrawal, R/o Main Road, Umarkot, P.S. Umarkot, Distt.- Navrangpur,0rissa. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 3T(^5T?iTR-fi* ayT3n^Ta)*<iqi qi+ldl Sh*1iq» 3:^'<ii<<ivi'i|, aiTnu'is, Rtcii^y ^J^^!.^^^[200 3ii^i 4a<»i (li,':<i^'!l<il3') SBiiWBf^cTsn^T £.'1. Shri Vipin Tiwari, Advoc^ Hssrd. • • '' By thls petitlon under petltioner has questioned the| 27.10.2006 (Annexure.P-2) Glaims Tribunal, (FTC), Du| learned Tribunal has rejected for extension of time to .file Section IS^ofthe MotorVehicl i have perused the irnpi|i that as per the provislons of f; aliowed to fi!e the ',vritten stel! upto 90 days and non-applicat! 90 days' time but he faj'ed to 1|i entitied to extend the time and appiication dated 27.10.2006 copy of claim petition fiied but before that non-appiicai reaardlnfl non-recelpt of the !n the matter ofSaleml |fltrticie 227 of the Constitution of india the iegality & correctness of the order dated p^ssed by the 12 Additiona! Motor Accident Vs. Unlon of India decided ori the Hon'bie Apex Court heid statemeni beyond 90 days bi^ can be extended only m exce^ has to bs borne sn mind that of 90 days. Tha discrevon of\ <tii<]fn<fl-i tii*iCTT^'tecfl<Ri'trii<. ^?3f1^H3lI^T ate for the petitioner. i|-g in Ctaim Case No.109/2005 whersby |the applicatlon of the petitioner herein filed (he reply of the claim petition filed under :|es Act. igned order in which it 'nas been mentioned pule 1 of Order 8 of CPC 30 days' time is jtement, w'hich can 'oe extended maximum i^t No.3 has already been granted more than jiie the written statement. The Tribunai is not for the flrst time non-applicant No.3 by his [raised a plea that he has not received the Section 168 of the Motor Vehictes Act, i^t No;3 has never raised any objection ofthec'aim petition. Advocafe Bar Association, Tsmll Nadu 2.8.2005 reported In A!R SCW 3827, 1|hat 'fr'/ne can fle extended for fiHng written <|( that cannot be made in routlne. The tima ^ionally hard cases. Whiie extending tsme, it iegislatwe has fixsd the tipper 6me limit the Coun to extend the time shall not be so cotsy P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3II^T?irf^lN) t.i5?a'tl^Tst'Hl«b ^..' -;' ^ ^9 3^ '<4l<lldq, SrftWTS, &<iiy^< fli*[cii aiHT<^ ^ 200 Sii^i Maqi (l^g^y) SCTraTflfNsTI^T ?L frequemly and mutsnely exer^ Vil!Rule1: In this case, if the pef ctaim petiilon, then he ought| of his appearance that hs ha| He raised this objection only an afterthought. In the cireumstances, a case for Interference by th'^ of india because this is not exercise the jurisdiction veste]! in it or this is not, in any case,| In th®resuit, the petltit and accordingiy, it is dismiss^d C-onsequently, M.(W.)Ff |titioner herein has not received the copy of |to have raised this piea on the very first day not rec&ived the copy of the ciaim petition. ^fter passing of 90 days period, thus this was the petitioner has not been abie to make out fe Court under Articie 227 of the Constitution fe case v/here iearned Tribunal has failed to jd in 'rt or exercised the jurisdiction not vested |a perverse. order. 9pn of the petitioner is iiable to be dismissed <t>l<<Iil41-< WRTf ff toA <R]+&1< ^i-sri^iTsi^r ised so as te nuiiify the psriod ftxsd by'Order . No.4966/0.6 aiso stands disposed of. Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice P.T.O.