IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY FRIDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2011 / 24TH ASHADHA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 2159 of 2011() ------------------------- CC.1120/2010 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-I, ATTINGAL .................... PETITIONERS/A1 TO A4:- ---------------------------- 1. MUHAMMED RAFI, S/O.ABDUL HAMEED RAISA MANZIL, CHERAMANTHURUTH AZHOOR VILLAGE. 2. SULFI, S/O.ABDUL HAMEED VADAKKE THAIVILAKOM, CHERAMANTHURUTH AZHOOR VILLAGE. 3. ANVAR @ ATHRABI,S/O. ABDUL HAKEEM SAFAN MANZIL, CHERAMANTHURUTH DESOM,AZHOOR VILLAGE 4. THAHIR, S/O.ABDUL HAMEED SUHAIMA MANZIL, CHERAMANTHURUTH DESOM AZHOOR VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.SHAJIN S.HAMEED RESPONDENTS/STATE & CW1:- ------------------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. 2. FAZIYA ,AGED 24 (CW1) D/O. AISHATH BEEVI, KIZHAKKE THAIVILAKOM VEEDU CHEAMANTHURUTH DESOM, KADINAMKULAM VILLAGE. ADV. SRI.V.S.THOSHIN FOR R2 SRI. B. VINOD, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CRL.M.C.NO. 2159/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A : CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO. 91/09 OF KADINAMKULAM POLICE STATION NOW PENDING AS C.C.NO. 1120/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-I, ATTINGAL. ANNEXURE B : AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rv B.P. RAY, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C. No. 2159 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 15th day of July, 2011. O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned counsel for the State and the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent. 2. The petitioners are accused Nos. 1 to 4 in Crime No. 91 of 2009 of Kadinamkulam Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 447, 427, 506(ii) and 34 IPC and now pending as C.C. No. 1120 of 2010 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate- I, Attingal. It is stated by the learned counsel for the second respondent that the matter has been settled outside the court. If that be so, respondent No.2 shall make a statement before the trial court to that effect. In that event if the learned Magistrate is satisfied that the matter has been settled out of court, then he shall close the case. This Crl.M.C is disposed of as above. sd/- B.P. RAY, JUDGE. rv