IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.1488 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 29.01.2010 Surinder Singla .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sherry K.Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner challenges his transfer from Government College, Sangrur to Government College, Malerkotla, made vide order dated 4.7.2008 (Annexure P-1) as a result of restructuring and rationalization of the staff. The precise grievance of the petitioner is that after transferring him from Sangrur, two part-time Lecturers, namely, respondent Nos.4 & 5 have been employed/retained/adjusted at Sangrur which, according to the petitioner, has disrupted his continuation at Sangrur and is also contrary to the view taken by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.12113 of 2008 (Pawan Kumar Bansal and others versus State of Punjab and C.W.P.No .1488 of 2010 (O&M) 2 others), decided on 30.9.2008 (Annexure P-3). The petitioner is said to have represented the authorities vide representation dated 7/10.07.2009 (Annexure P-4) which appears to have been forwarded to the higher authorities but without any further response. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, however, without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioner's claim for his transfer from Malerkotla to Sangrur, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the representation said to have been moved by the petitioner through the Principal of the College for his transfer to Sangrur, as early as possible preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Disposed of. Dasti. 29-01-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE