IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43807 of 2008 SATYENDRA @ SATO PRASAD YADAV, son of Basudeo Yadav, resident of village Noudiha, P.S. Fatehpur, District Gaya ….. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ….. Opposite party ----------- 03/ 25.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code along with three others and all the FIR named accused are alleged to have assaulted the deceased lady with the butt of the gun. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that from the post- mortem report, it would appear that the lady died on account of injuries on the temporal region and as the petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the deceased lady on the chest and there being no injury on the chest, he be admitted to the privilege of bail when he remained in jail custody since 21.8.2008. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having noticed the omnibus allegation of assault against all the FIR named accused persons, including the petitioner, I am not inclined to admit the petitioner to the privilege of bail at this stage. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. He is, however, at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completing one year in jail custody. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)