IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-19975 of 2009 Date of Decision: December 8, 2009 Jatinder Kaur and another …. Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others …. Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present: Mr.Jasjit Singh, Advocate, for the petitiners. Mr. Arshvinder Singh, DAG, Punjab. S.D. Anand, J. (Oral) Reply filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 is taken on record. As per report made by the Registry, notice could not be issued to respondent No.6 as his correct address is not filed. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he would be content and interests of justice would be served if a direction is issued to respondent No.2 – Senior Superintendent of Police, Faridkot, to look into the representation (Annexure P/4) made by the petitioners within a time bound frame. Crl. Misc. No. M-19975 of 2009 The petition shall stand disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 – Senior Superintendent of Police, Faridkot, to look into the grievance of the petitioner, in the course of the representation (Annexure P/4). The exercise shall be concluded within one month from today. Disposed of accordingly. A copy of the order be given to the learned State counsel under the signatures of Special Secretary. December 8, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2