T" ^ ^ mCH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition <S) No. 4881of20^ KV •' <;. i' :1 PETITIONER : Manoj Kumar Manjhi, S/o Shri Jogsingh Manjhi, aged about 38 years, Patwari P.C. N0. 11, Chandkhuri, R/o village Khurshipahar, Tahsil Pithora, District Mahasamund (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. The State of Chhatrisgarh through the Secretary, Department ofRevenue, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (GG). 2. Under Secretary, Department of Revenue, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 3. The Collector, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (CG). 4. Sub Divisional Otfice (R), Sub Division Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (CG). 5. Sub Divisional Office (R), Sub Division Saraipali, District Mahasamund (CG). 6. Tahsildar, Basna, DistrictMahasamund(CG). (WRIT pE'rrnoN UNDER ARIICLB 226 OF'I'HE coNs-n'ru'noN OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Sattsh K. Agmhotri, J.) £resent : Ms. Sharmila Singhai, Advocate tbr thepetitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur; Deputy Advocate General with Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on this 1 day of September, 2008) 1. With the consent of the parties, fhe matter is taken up for hearing finallv. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that tfae pefitibner does not want to press this petition on merrt at this stage. However, the petitioner may be permitted to make a represerrtation befiMJe^th|81? - :: -- :. , ^; i'i'.::^i^WV concemed authorities within a period of three days and the saraie ma^ y .;' 4 '^1 ^. ¥ 'ii&'.. " 1 -""€& li 1,. ^ "i J '"^.^s-sS'' ^ ^Q De to be decided within the prescribed time. She farther submits that the petitioner has been transterred to the place against which a representation is pendmg consideration before tbe concemed SpJ^i 3. Shri Thakur, leamed counsel appearing tbr t'he State submits tb.at pending represenlation ofShn Surati Das Manipuri, and representation. ot' the present petitioner; shall be decided together by the concerned authonty within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of representation. Shri Thakur, further submits that no coereive steps shall be taken; till the disposal ofthe representation. 4. I hope a.nd trust that the State Government shall examine the representation objectively in accordance with law and guidelines, issued bv the Government, time to time. 5. In view of foregoing, the petition sta.nds disposed of. No order asto costs. 6. Consequently, I.A. No. l, application fbr grant of interim relief, also stands disposed ot. Sd/- Satjsh K. Agnihotri Judge