WPs 4775/11, 4780/11 & 4808/11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4775/2011 Gajanan Sakharam Popalghat V/s The State & others. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4708/2011 Gajanan Appaji Jadhav V/s The State & others. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4808/2011 Baban Raghoji Kamble V/s The State & others. _______________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | Shri G.C. Navandar, Advocate for petitioners. Shri V.H. Dighe, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3. Shri G.R. Syed, Advocate h/f Shri Y.B. Pathan, Advocate for respondent no.4. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. Date: 19.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners have an alternative efficacious remedy by way of an appeal. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to entertain the writ petitions. The same are disposed of by relegating the petitioners to avail the alternative remedy available in law. It is directed that in case WPs 4775/11, 4780/11 & 4808/11 2 there is any delay in filing the appeal, the benefit of Section 14 of the Indian Limitation Act be given for the period for which the petitioners were bona fide prosecuting the present petitions. (M.T. Joshi, J.) (B.R. Gavai, J.) Dt/- 19.09.2011 ndk/c199111