1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA. C.W.P No. 544 of 2011-A Date of Decision: 12.12.2011. 1. Shri Azhar Ahmed s/o Shri Zameer Ahmed, 2. Shri Athar Ahmed s/o Shri Zameer Ahmed, Both residents of Mohalla Gunnughat, Nahan, P.O. Nahan, District Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh. Permanent resident of Sabri Ka Bag, Indira Chowk, near Bastyon Ka Madarasha, District Saharanpur, U.P. …Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Himachal Pradesh through its Principal Secretary (Welfare), Shimla-2, H.P. 2. The Director, Zila Sainik Welfare, Hamirpur, District Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh. 3. The Deputy Director, Zila Sainik Welfare, Sirmour at Nahan, District Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh. …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners: Mr.Lalit Kumar Sehgal, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr.R.M Bisht, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Virender Singh Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No. 3. Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of the appropriate writ, orders or directions to the respondents. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Sanjay Karol, J. (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the present petition, he has already approached the Divisional Commissioner, Sirmour, however, no decision is being taken on his representation due to pendency of the present petition. As such, he prays that a direction be issued to the Divisional Commissioner, Sirmour to take a decision on his representation, in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, decision shall be taken by taking into account attending circumstances and hardships faced by the writ petitioner. With these directions, writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Sanjay Karol), December 12, 2011 Judge. (Sanjeev)