IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23031 of 2010 LACHHUMAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 7/ 09.02.2011 In view of the Court’s order, neither complainant nor husband is physically present in Court. Only their lawyers are present in Court. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Torture for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry is the allegation. Defence is about filing of Matrimonial Case No. 135 of 2008 in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Motihari, East Champaran for divorce on the ground that after the marriage complainant remained to her parents never consumed the marriage and eloped with one Shiv Shanker Prasad. After one year of the divorce case, this complaint case is filed not justifying refusal of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. C-1010 of 2009 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Sadar at Motihari subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)