IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST OCTOBER 2009 / 29TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 29386 of 2009(P) --------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. SWAROOPA PRABHAKAR.K.P, D/O.PRABHAKAR K.P, AGED 22 YEARS, 'RAM VIHAR' THIRUTHIYAD, PUTHIYARA POST,CALICUT 673 004,KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. KRISHNAPRIYA.H, D/O.HARIHARA IYER, AGED 22 YEARS, 'POPPY PALACE' EAST HILL ROAD, ERANHIPALAM POST,CALICUT 673 004,KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. WINNY EDAPALLY, D/O.EARNEST EDAPALLY, AGED 22 YEARS, NADUTHODI PARAMBA, NEAR ANUSREE TRADERS,KUTHIRAVATTOM POST, CALICUT 673 004,KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADVS. MR.V.T.MADHAVANUNNI, MR.V.A.SATHEESH. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY POST, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY POST, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, A.W.H ENGINEERING COLLEGE, KUTTIKKATTOOR, CALICUT 673 008, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY MR. P.C. SASIDHARAN, S.C (CALICUT UNIVERSITY). THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/10/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ----------------------------- W.P(C) No.29386 of 2009-P ------------------------------ Dated this the 21st day of October, 2009. J U D G M E N T Heard Sri.V.T.Madhavanunni, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, the learned standing counsel appearing for the Calicut University. In the nature of the order that I propose to pass I do not deem it necessary to issue notice to or hear the third respondent. 2. Petitioners 1 and 2 appeared for the supplementary 5th and 6th semester B.Tech degree examinations held in March and May 2009 respectively. The third petitioner appeared for the 6th semester supplementary B.Tech degree examination held in May 2009. They failed in various papers. They have therefore applied for revaluation of their answer scripts by submitting Exts.P2, P3, P5, P6 and P8 applications. The petitioners submit that they have completed their course of study and if their answer scripts are revalued they are sure to secure a pass. It is stated that petitioners 2 and 3 have been offered appointment in Infosys Technologies Ltd. and that unless their answer scripts are expeditiously revalued they will be put to serious prejudice. In this writ petition the petitioners seek a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to revalue their answer scripts expeditiously and to communicate the results to them. W.P(C) No.29386 of 2009-P 2 3. Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Calicut University submits that the University will revalue the petitioners’ answer scripts, if their applications are otherwise in order, expeditiously and communicate the results to them within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. In the light of the said submission, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to take steps to have the petitioners’ answer scripts revalued and to communicate the result to them if their applications are in order, within two months from the date on which the petitioners produce a certified copy of this judgment before the Controller of Examinations, University of Calicut. Sd/- P.N.RAVINDRAN JUDGE //True Copy// PA to Judge ab W.P(C) No.29386 of 2009-P 3