IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26684 of 2010 1. UDHO MAHTON @ AJIT KUMAR MAHTON son of Mogal Mahton 2. Madho Mahton son of Mogal Mahton 3. Karua Mahton @ Dipak Kumar Bidrohi son of Stwari Mahton 4. Roshan Mahton son of Prabhu Mahton 5. Chandragupt Mahton son of late Kundan Patel 6. Ram Pravesh Mahton son of Anuplal Mahto 7. Narayan Mahton son of late Budhan Mahton 8. Onkar Mahton son of late Hari Mahton 9. Sushil Kumar @ Maina Mamu son of late Newalal Mahton 10. Jhintu Mahton son of late Madan Lal Mahton 11. Deva Mahton son of late Asharfi Mahton 12. Shamkar Mahton son of Jagdish Mahton 13. Shambhu Mahton son of Jagadish Mahton 14. Hare Ram Mahton son of Jagadish Mahton 15. Prabhu Mahton son of late Hari Mahton 16. Jagadish Mahton son of late Sheodhar Mahton 17. Rambilash Mahton son of Kishori Mahton --------------------------Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 26.8.2010 Heard Learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Several allegations were made in the case including offence under section 3(1)(X) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe(Prevention of Atrocities) Act but cognizance is taken for the offence under sections 323 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that land dispute is there. Informant party was adamant to take possession over petitioners’ land which they have purchased from Jagmaya Devi, the real owner of the land. Earlier to the instant case, complaint case no.849 of 2006 is filed by one of the accused Dipak Kumar Patel which includes offence under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code also. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, above named 2 petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, in connection with Complaint Case no.913C/2006 ,subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh,J )