CRLMB6643/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.6643/2010 Iram Vs. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor Date of Order ::: 27.07.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Rahul Tiwari, Counsel for petitioner Shri Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available to me during the arguments of the case. Contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that alleged offence against the petitioner and other co-accused is one under Section 394 IPC, whereas recovery of tractor was made at the instance of co-accused Harun and that of plough was made at the instance of Mauju and both have already been enlarged on bail by a coordinate Bench of this Hon'ble Court vide its order dated 05.02.2010 in S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.1433/2010 and order dated 01.012.2009 in S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.9655/2009, respectively. Case of the petitioner stands on better footing, who is in jail since 12.03.2010. Challan has been filed; trial of the case will take a long; there is no previous case ever registered against the petitioner. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, I deem it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner, namely, Iram Son of Shri Khursheed on bail under CRLMB6643/2010 // 2 // Section 439 Cr.P.C., in FIR No.417/2009, Police Station Tapukda, District Alwar, under Section 394 IPC, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sureties of Rs.15000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The bail application stands disposed of. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//