IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.141 of 2009 SATYENDRA PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02. 22.06.2011 Petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher on 13.08.1962 and retired on 31.01.1999. During his service period, he was granted the benefit of first time-bond-promotion with effect from 01.04.1981, but the second time-bond-promotion was not allowed to him considering the fact that the petitioner has retired long time back in the year 1999 and there is nothing to show that before filing of this Writ Application, he ever made any representation before the competent authority, making such prayer. This Writ Application is being disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioner for representing his case before the competent authority, i.e., the District Superintendent of Education, Banka for making prayer to grant second time-bond- promotion. In case such representation is filed by the petitioner, the Respondent No. 2 will examine the entitlement of the petitioner in accordance with law. In case the petitioner is found entitled for the benefit of second time-bond-promotion, it must be 2 allowed to the petitioner with all consequential benefits within three months from the date of filing of the representation. Accordingly, this Writ Application is disposed of. SKM (Mridula Mishra, J.)