fS' ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) iw ••(i'^t W. P. N0. PETITIONER <'^e^' ^^" .6.' A®" ^- ^w* <?v .A®'A-" OF 2004 P. R. Dongarwar, S/o Shri Vishwanath Rao Dongarwar, Aged 60 years, Occupation Service, presently posted as Time Keeper, E/M Division, Public Wofks Department Raipur, R/o Qr.No.I/10,01d Pensionbada, Raipur [C.G.] VERSUS RESPONDENTS '<»>• !. 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur[CG] 2. Executive Engineer, E & M Division, Public Works Department, Raipur [CG] WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERS: 'Ns;'^^^' \"^tS;^;ysg5£ '";''../v.n> ^v'^'^ .sl^g^ '"s ^/^ -S^ ^!raTePT,.®Tii'yie, .^..f.^,.^.\..\.5. 19-3-2013:- Shri Amit Verma, counsell Shri; - Satish Gupta, Gcjvt Taniaskar, P.L. for theState/re; Heard. The petitioner has pref^ direction to the respondents no) age of 60 years and allow him t4 the age of 62 years. This relie^ that the petitioner was appointejd and he was paid salaiy of Clas retired on attaining the age'ojf superannuation for a Class-III if the petitioner was Class-IV salary, he should have been retij It appears, the petitioner documents before this Court work on different posts during| supportive dopument, it is diffij raised by the petitioner. Therefi that if the petitioner s'dbmits competent authority seeking re| i.e. the 4ifference of age of ^nqf^q^ T^^f "^ 7^^ ^^K ^affiman^T ifor the petitioner. Advocate with Shri Rahul Ipondents. ^rred this writ petition seeking i|: to retire him upon attaining the continue in service till he attains has been clainied on the ground as Time Keeper in the year 1967 LSJS-IV post and at the end, he was 60 years, which is the age of tmployee. It has been stated that iniployee for which he was paid -ed at the age of 62 years. tias not submitted all the relevartt^ regard to his appointment arid service career. In the absence of :ult to adjudicate upon the issue fore, for the present, it is directed fresh- representation before the |[ief for grant of salary for 2 years rettrement of Class-TV and Class-III wlth R. rer -^j^io^. -s-tfi^^ T^nwp; s«s!i ggji.,,»-»»- -L- employee, the same shall be ^>Nlwi^Tf^P^ ^ t^^ '?f^^R ^sifgHCT^T considered and decided by the respondents, as early as possib}e, preferably within a period of 6 months froni the date of receipt The writ petition is dispo^ M(W)P No.570/2004 also stands] ^f representation. ed of accordingly. Consequentfy, disposed of. Barve »w Sd;- prashant Kumar Nlishra Judge i"i"IS