WP(C) 1560/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR J CHELAMESWAR THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. M Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Aggrieved by an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Gu wahati Bench in Original Application No. 213/2006 dated 23.3.2007 the unsuccessf ul applicant preferred the present writ petition. The Original Application itsel f came to be filed challenging the order dated 10.8.2006 passed by the responden t No. 3 transferring the petitioner to Arunachal Pradesh State Social Welfare Bo ard. The transfer order came to be passed in the background of the fa ct that an amount of Rs. 98,700/- was withdrawn by the Cashier attached to the o ffice of the 4th respondent with the approval of the petitioner here. It appears that under the relevant rules such a withdrawal is required to be made only wit h the concurrence of the 4th respondent which was not obtained in the instant ca se. The petitioner claims that it was not his legal obligation to obtain the con currence of the 4th respondent and it is totally a fault on the part of the cash ier to have withdrawn the amount without the concurrence of the 4th respondent. These are all matters which are required to be examined in appro priate proceeding. We are informed that a separate disciplinary proceeding is in itiated where all these matters can be appropriately examined. It is in the background of the mentioned facts the present impug ned order came to be passed. The Central Administrative Tribunal on elaborate co nsideration of the materials saw no merit and rejected the application. It is settled law that this Court in exercise of jurisdiction un der Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not expected to normally interfe re in the matters of transfer of employees of the State, barring exceptional sit uation like where the power is exercised malafide or without jurisdiction. We do not see any reason warranting interference of this Court w ith the order under challenge. The writ petition is devoid of merit and therefore dismissed at the admission stage.