HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION NO:5620 OF 2000 DATED:12.8.2010. Between: M.V. Premanandam …Petit And: 1. The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Governm of A.P., and Chairman, A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educatio Institutions Society, Masab Tank, Hyderabad and another. …Respond This Court made the following: HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION NO:5620 OF 2000 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking to issue a Writ of Certiorari calli the records relating to the proceedings of the 2nd respondent issu Rc.No.Z-II/00317/98, dated 6.2.1999 and confirmation order of th respondent issued in proceedings Rc.No.Z-II/00317/98, dated 3.5.19 terminating the services of the petitioner from the respondents-socie illegal and arbitrary and quash the same and consequently, to respondents 1 and 2 to reinstate the petitioner into service with all be i.e., seniority, backwages etc., forthwith. The case of the petitioner reads as follows: He was appointed as Post Graduate Teacher in the year 1990 posted to A.P. Social Welfare Residential School, L.N. Puram, Godavari District. He joined duty on 9.11.1990 and worked for a period years and he was terminated from service w.e.f. 25.8.1998 by the ord the 2nd respondent, dated 6.2.1999, on the ground that he left the co without obtaining any prior permission from the competent authority. It case of the petitioner that during the month of May, 1998, his wife, w working as Teacher in South Africa, fell sick and therefore, he went and while applying for passport, for grant of permission he mad application mentioning the said fact and therefore, he could not return in to India. Aggrieved by the termination orders, he filed an appeal befo 1st respondent and the same was also rejected without affording opportunity or any notice. Hence, the petitioner filed the presen petition. Heard the learned Counsel and perused the material availab record. The main grievance of the petitioner is that his appeal has rejected without affording any opportunity of hearing to him or issuing notice whereas the respondents stated in their counter-affidavit that no sent had been retuned by the postal authorities stating “service suspend It is also the case of the respondents that the petitioner secured and left the country without obtaining any prior permission and contra the instructions contained in Rule 12(a) of the Conduct Rules for emplo of the A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions So (Registered), Hyderabad and therefore, his services were terminated. It is a case where the petitioner left the country without any permission. The material on record clearly goes to show that notices been sent to him, but returned. In these circumstances, the conduct of the petitioner amoun violation of the C.C.C.A Rules and therefore, the authorities cannot be fault with the action taken by them in accordance with the rules. Under the above circumstances, I do not find any ground to inte with the order impugned herein and the writ petition is liable to be dismi Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _____________________ Justice T.Meena Ku Date:12.08.2010 NN HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION NO:5620 OF 2000 DATE:12.8.2010.