,^-v^-^^^^-ov^^^^^^^^. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR V. WRIT PETITION (Art. 227) N0.33^3 OF 2010 PETITIONER/ PLAINTIFF/ DECREE HOLDER ^ Dinesh Kumar Chouksey, S/o Shri Ramdayal Chouksy, aged about 50 years, R/o Tikrapara, Ramdas Nagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (CG). . RESPONDENTS/ ^l. JUDGMENT DEBTQR/ DEFENDANTS .-.^^®- ..^^" »••' ^. Versus Mahesh Kumar Agrawal, S/o Late Shri Harchand Rai, aged about 58 years, R/o Kharsia, presently R/o Jarhabhata, Bilaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (CG). Ishwarlal, S/o Late Shri Harchand Rai, aged about 60 years, R/o Kharsia, Tahsil 85 District Raigarh (CG). Smt. Shakuntala, W/o Shri Sitaram, aged about 61 years, R/o Belha, Tahsil Belha, District Bilaspur (CG). Smt. Radha Bai, W/o Shri Narsingh Lal, aged about 59 years, R/o Sambalpur, Tahsil & District Sambalpur (Oriss^a). Smt. Kusum Bai, W/o Shri Naresh Kumar, aged about 54 years, R/o Raigarh,^ Tahsil & Disfrict Raigarh (CG). y 6. Smt. Premlata, W/o Shri Santosh Kumar, aged about 50 years/ R/o Sambalpur, Tahsil & District Sambalpur (Orissa). J\^- ^4. 5. w^^-'y •1 ^' .^'-V.^ ^ /}y ^ ^^ / 7. Smt. Lata, W/o Shri Govind Ram, aged about 47 years, R/o Kharsiya, Tahsil & District Raigarh (CG). ^ele^! O^er^-^rs.—S^—Pa^TB5~-w7o-Late~Shri CO^Y^ O^efer BN^? " I Harchand Rai, ' aged about 80 ^3|C^|!l.^[o ^ Harchand Rai, aged about 80 years, R/o Kharsiya, Tahsil & District Raigarh (CG). /9. Purshottam Lal, S/o Late Shri Harchand Rai, aged about 55 years, R/o Kharsiya, Tahsil & District Raigarh (CG). WRIT PETITIGN UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA U5' HIGH CQURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(C) No. 97/2007 PBTITIONER RESPONDENTS Mahesh Kumar Agrawal Versus Dinesh Kumar Chaukse and others AT PRESENT:- Shri SaifKhan, Advocate, for the appellant. Shri Varunendra Mishra, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. W.P.(227) No. 3373/2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Dinesh Kumar Chaukse Versus Mahesh Kumar Agrawal and others PRESENT:- Shri Varunendra Mishra, Advocate, for appellant. Shri SaifKhan, Adv. for the respondents No. 1 to 7 and 9. SB:- HON»BLESHM N.K. AGARWAL, J ORAL ORDER (11-2-2011) 1. W.P.(C) No. 97/2007 and W.P.(227) N6. 3373/2010 are counter petitlons. 2. Learned counsel for petitioners in both the above petitions want to withdraw these petitions. 3. The petitions are therefore, dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge p ..'^'^^ "•