HIGHCOURTOF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cl N0.5802 OF 2008 PETmQNER RESPONDENTS Tarachand Nema, agect ab. 65, S/o Late Sohanlal Nema, Bilaigarh Bada, Rafpur. Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarhliy Secretary, Local Self Govt., Mantralaya, Raipur. 2. Municipal Corporation. Raipur, Thro' its Commissioner, Office at Malviya Road, Raipur. 3. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, City Division Q/Vest), Raipur, Thro' its Executive Engineer. 4. Ratan Daga,S/o Late Jhumartal JiDaga, Opposite Bharat Kjraya Bhandar, Kanakli Para, Raipur. 5. Jitendra Bahadur Singh, Zamindaar, S/o not known to pefiUoner. 6. Ku. Mayarani, D/o Jitendra Bahadur Singh. Respondents No.5 & 6 are resident of Teh. Bflaigarh, Raipur. (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) SingteBench : Hon'bleShri SaUsh K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri RajaSharma, counselfor the petitioner. Shri A.S. Gaharwar, Addl. Advocate General for the State/ respondent No.1 & CSEB/respondent No.3. Shri H.B ^rawal, Sr. Advocate with Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate for the respondent No.2. Shri Y.C. Sharma, counsel forfrie respondent No.4 ORALORDER (Passedon ttiis 18t>'dayof0ctober,2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seelcs permission of this Coart to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to the altemative statutory forum that may be available to the petttioner. However. learned counsel submits that on account of ensuing Diwali holidays, the pet'rtioner is not in a position to make alternative arrangement; Moving the Civil Court maytake sometime. Thus, the petitioner may be granted some protection •^- iN^: Gowri 2) Aceordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Liberty is reserved to the petitionerto take appropriate proceedings before the jurisdictional C'lvil Court. The petittoner is ateo granted protection up to 3"1 Novsmber, 2008. During this period, no action shall be taken by the respondents to remove the petitioner or demotish thestructure or any other steps causing inconvenience to the peUUoner in respect of the building including supply of water & electricity connection. 3) This order has been passed in exercise of equily jurisdicBon of this Court. 4) The observations, if any, made hereinabove shall not come in the vrayofadjudication bythe Civil Court. ••Sd/-i , SatishK.Agnihotri Judge