IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16810 of 2010 1. SALAMANA SAJLIN D/O MD. FAROOQUE R/O VILL.- KURSEL BALUA, P.S.- JOKIHAT, DISTT.- ARARIA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR (PRIMARY EDUCATION) HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 4. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PURNEA DIVISION, PURNEA 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ARARIA 6. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ARARIA 7. THE DISTRICT TEACHERS EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ARARIA 8. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, ARARIA 9. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, ARARIA 10. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, JOKIHAT, DISTT.- ARARIA 11. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, JOKIHAT, DISTT.- ARARIA 12. THE MUKHIA, GRAM PANCHAYAT PACHHIYARI PIPARA, BLOCK- JOKIHAT, DISTT.- ARARIA 13. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ PACHHIYARI PIPRA, BLOCK- JOKIHAT, DISTT.- ARARIA 14. MD. KHUSHNUD ALAM S/O ANWARUL HAQUE R/O VILL.- BALUA, P.S.- MAHALGAON, DISTT.- ARARIA 15. MIR MUZAFFAR ALAM S/O MD. MIR MASIUR RAHMAN R/O VILL.- BALUA, P.S.- MAHALGAON, DISTT.- ARARIA 16. BIBI SAJDA KHATOON W/O MD. ILHAZ R/O VILL.- BALUA, P.S.- MAHALGAON, DISTT.- ARARIA 17. MD. SAKIN ANWAR S/O ABDUL RAZZAK R/O VILL.- BALUA, P.S.- MAHALGAON, DISTT.- ARARIA 18. MD. TARIQ ANWAR S/O MOINUDDIN R/O VILL.- MARUA, P.S.- AMOR, DISTT.- PURNIA 19. SHUSHRUT ANAND SHANKAR S/O KRISHNA KUMAR VISHWAS R/O VILL.- AMGACHI, P.S.- MAHALGAON, DISTT.- ARARIA ----------- 02/- 09/05/2011 Stand of the petitioner is that Annexure -1, which is impugned in the present writ application, was challenged by some other petitioners. The said order was quashed and 2 matter was remitted back to the Tribunal on the ground that those petitioners were not made party and given an opportunity of hearing. The learned Single Judge, in terms of Annexure - 11, held that procedure was illegal and therefore quashed the order and remitted back those petitions to the Tribunal for fresh hearing and adjudication. The present petitioner is also one of the persons who is affected by Annexure -1. In view of the aforesaid facts contained in Annexure 11, Annexure -1 is quashed in so far as it relates to the present petitioner. He is directed to move the concerned Tribunal for being impleaded as a party and to be given an opportunity of hearing before passing a fresh order. The writ application is allowed. Nitesh (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)