IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9431 of 2009 RAJ KISHORE PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 21.08.2009. The petitioner states that some typographical errors appeared in order no.2 dated 7.8.2009, passed by this court in the instant writ petition. Order aforesaid is rectified in the following terms. 1. Let at 1st page amount of Rs. 2 lakhs be read as Rs. 2.94 lakhs as father of the petitioner had taken loan of Rs. 2.94 lakhs. 2. The word ‘deed amount’ mentioned in seventh line at page 2 be read as ‘due amount.’ At the same page, the line ‘The Managing Director of the Corporation vide order dated 23.7.2009 took over the possession of the mortgaged properties for handing it over to the purchaser’ be read as ‘ The Managing Director of the Corporation vide order dated 23.7.2009 directed to take over the possession of the mortgaged properties for handing it over to the purchaser’. 3. At 3rd page, let the date ‘11.02.1992’ be read as year ‘1988-89’. At the same page, the line ‘ possession was taken over vide memo no. 286 dated 12.07.2000’ be read as ‘possession was directed to be taken over vide memo no. 286 dated 12.07.2002’. In the same page, let words ‘residential house of the petitioner has been sold for non payment of loan’ be read as ‘residential house of the petitioner has been ordered to be sold for non - 2 - payment of loan’. 4. In the concluding para of order, let the word ‘statue quo’ be read as ‘satus quo’. Shashi (S.P.Singh, J.)