IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.21197 of 2010 Date of Decision: November 29, 2010 Gurmit Kaur .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab and others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. R.K. Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to step up the pay of the petitioner equivalent to her juniors. 2. It has been brought out that vide Annexure P-1, a representation was made in regard to anomaly created by the respondents. Decision has been taken vide Annexure P-2, however, no further action has been taken. 3. Vide Annexure P-2, the following CWP No.21197 of 2010 [2] decision has been taken:- “2. Keeping in view the representation of the employee mentioned under subject, it is written that the concerned employee be given all due benefits as per rules/instructions in time. If approval/sanction is required from the Government, then complete self-explanatory proposal be sent to the Government.” 4. I find the petition to be premature in so much as Annexure P-2 was passed on 24.9.2010 in response to representation dated 27.8.2010 (Annexure P-1). 5. The Court trusts that the respondent-State would take appropriate action to remove the anomaly, in case any exists. 6. The petition is disposed of. (AJAI LAMBA) November 29, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?