^- \ S.B. (Service Matteri IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION(S) N0.4^3 /2010. PETITIONER: Respondents co e^ ^ ^yy' ^:y^^)"' ->~/.:KO-'^\-' ^ <<"- Prakash Kumar Das, son of Late Bhagwan Das, aged about 31 years, working as Shiksha Karmi Grade-3, Govt. Primary School, Girijatoli, (Jambahar) Tahsil Farsabahar, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, Tribal Department, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Commissioner, Schedule Tribe and Schedule Caste Development, Chhattisgarh, Raipur. ^-3. Collector, Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. ^- /H^'^+Q^ ^07^'7r]l'^Sl'G[Htr<r^ft>aA Jas h^>u^ O {if'vtcf- Jaskpuh. C^W^^- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE <^- CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^- T *ITN<tT <»)1HT^ '3^r -^i&ii<n^ y>Til<-i<i<o, f®idl^!j,< \Aj,^sj r^ ^z^/fo-^zoq ^TI^T Tra^? (i??^^) W^I'^Tf^TW ^SH ^TT^T sft^i<^ Tumane ^nw^^rf^T ^^ SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivfeistava.J. 05-08-2010 Shri C. Jayant K Rao, counsel forttl copy. compassionate appointment dated 10-06-2) the petitioner was given compassionat^ <=?»l^<fllHPT^f ^ fe^ 'tf^5K ^3TRma^T e petitioner. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel Lawy^r for the State/respondents on advance Heard. Learned counset for the petition^r submits that in view of poticy of 303, which was in force at the time when appointment, he was entitted to be appointed on the post of Assistant Teac|her in regular estabtishment Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he vfas given compassionate appointment on the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade-111 vide Learned counset for the petitioner submits is not a regular post On the other hand, submission of ti perusal of circular dated 03-09-2005 and 1 thatthe post of Shiksha Karmi is a post bor|ie in the regular estabtishment There is no other material on recor^l to show that the post of Shiksha Karmi, Grade-111 is a temporary post However| approach respondents No.2, 3 and 4 to brjng this fact to their notice and ralse such claim for appointment on a regutar p| compassionate appointment tn case, sucfi representation is made, the concerned authority shall take decision expeditiousty c| law. With the aforesaid obser^ation, the t>rder dated 30-06-2005 (Annexure P/2). |that the post of Shiksha Karmi, Grade-lil sarned counset for respondents is that a 4-07-2005 (Annexure P/4) ctearty shows it would be open for the petitioner to 3st in accordance with the policy of n such representation in accordance with ^etition is finatly disposed of Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge 4-