IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 29TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 35292 of 2010(J) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- DIVYA K.R., AGED 22 YEARS, D/O.RAVI DEVI NIVAS, NEAR L.P.SCHOOL, SASTRI ROAD, THIRUVANKULAM P.O., ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS. SRI.SHAIJAN C.GEORGE SRI.JOHN VIPIN SMT.SAJITHA GEORGE SRI.ABISHEK KURIAN SMT.REKHA S. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, COCHIN-22, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. R1 BY ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI,SC,COCHI U THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.35292 of 2010 ------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of November, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner completed B.tech Degree from the respondent university in March 2010. She passed all the semester examinations except 7th semester, where she failed in the subject “Language Processor Lab'. She appeared for the supplementary examination held on 7.7.2010. Results are still not declared. In the meantime, the petitioner has been short listed by the South Indian Bank and she has to appear for the interview, which will be held on 2.12.2010. The petitioner has to produce the certificates at the time of interview. Complaining of delay committed by the university in publishing the result, this writ petition has been filed. 2. I heard the Standing counsel for the respondent, who submits that though the results of the supplementary examination have been received, since the Passing Board has not so far met, the university is not in a position to declare the 2 W.P.(C).No.35292 of 2010 results before 2.12.2010. It is also stated that the steps have already been taken by the university to publish the results before 15.12.2010. 3. In my view, this is a fit case, where the university should be directed that irrespective of the convening of Passing Board, the university shall issue a consolidated mark list to the petitioner, as otherwise the petitioner will be deprived of the employment opportunity, which she can not afford. 4. Therefore, I direct that on production of copy of this judgment, the university will issue a consolidated mark-list, incorporating the supplementary results to the petitioner, so that the petitioner can produce the same before the interview board, where she is to appear on 2.12.2010. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the Controller of examination of the university for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge. ami/