IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Special Leave to Appeal No. 27 of 2010 in Criminal Appeal No. 83 of 2010 Yasin. …. Appellant Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ……Responents Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. Nandan Arya, learned A.G.A. for the State/respondent. Dated 01st July, 2010 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J. Heard Sri Piyush Garg, learned counsel for the complainant/appellant on the Special Leave to Appeal application and perused the record as well as judgment of the court below. Having considered the entire evidence available on record, we are of the view that no clinching and definite evidence is available against the accused-respondents which connect them with the commission of crime. It is a case, which rests on circumstantial evidence, and there is no evidence which points out towards the guilt of the accused in definite manner. The evidence produced by the prosecution has been properly assessed by the trial court. We do not find any infirmity in the impugned judgment and order passed by court below. 2 The Special Leave to appeal lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Special Leave to appeal is dismissed, consequently, Criminal Appeal against the acquittal of accused-respondents vide judgment and order dated 12.03.2010, is hereby dismissed. (Nirmal Yadav, J.) (B.C. Kandpal, J.) JKJ 01.07.2010