IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12045 of 2003 1. SUMITRA DEVI 2. CHHOTU RAVIDAS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 6/ 28/01/2010 It is submitted that the application has become infructuous with regard to petitioner no. 2, who is stated to have been appointed. Learned counsel fairly acknowledges that a fresh panel has been prepared in the year 2005 during the pendency of the writ application, in which name of petitioner no. 1 does not find place. He, however, submits that if any fresh advertisement is made and if petitioner no. 1 applies, her case may be considered in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the State rightly submits that the contention of the counsel for the petitioner is undisputable. The application stands disposed. AKS/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)