IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA FRIDAY, THE 21ST MAY 2010 / 31ST VAISAKHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 1931 of 2010() ----------------------------- (CRIME No.554/2009 OF KALLAMBALAM POLICE STATION) PETITIONERS/ACCUSED --------------------------------------- 1. RADHAKRISHNAN, S/O.GOPI, PLAVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, VETTIMAN KONAM, OTTOOR VILLAGE. 2. SHIBU, KANAL PURAMPOKKU, SIVAGIRI, VARKALA. 3. LAL, S/O.BABU, KANAL PURAMPOKKU, SIVAGIRI, VARKALA. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.MUHAMMED RESPONDENTS: --------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.TEK CHAND THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. HEMA, J ---------------------- B.A.No.1931 OF 2010 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of May, 2010 O R D E R This is a petition for anticipatory bail. 2. The alleged offences are under sections.294(b), 452, 380, 427 and 34 IPC. According to prosecution, on 30.11.2009 at about 1.30 pm. petitioners 1 to 3 trespassed into the house of defacto complainant, abused her in obscene language, damaged television set, DVD and other household articles due to previous enemity. Defacto complainant is a woman. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that parties are on identical terms with each other and no weapon is used and no injury is caused and therefore anticipatory bail may be granted. 4. This petition is opposed. Learned public prosecutor submitted that considering the nature of allegations made B.A. No.1931/10 2 this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Investigation is over and case has already taken on file by Magistrate Court as CC.145/2010, it is pointed out. 5. On hearing both sides, considering the nature of allegations made and other facts and circumstances of this case, this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. This petition is dismissed. K. HEMA, JUDGE. Sou.