1 ca11093.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD C.A.NO.11093/2010 IN FAST NO.21355/2010 (Daivshala vs. Narayan) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Coram: Shrihri P. Davare, J. Date : 12.01.2011. 1. Heard Shri A.N. Gaddime, Advocate, holding for Shri Anand V. Indrale Patil, for the applicants and Shri S.S. Manale, Advocate for the Respondents. 2. This is an application preferred by the applicants for condonation of delay of 329 days caused in filing accompanying first appeal. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicants have explained the delay, satisfactorily. Moreover, said delay does not appear to be willful, deliberate and intentional and, 2 ca11093.10 therefore, same deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. Further, the subject matter of appeal pertains to the enhancement of maintenance amount. 4. Hence, civil application allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) thereof and delay of 329 days caused in filing accompanying first appeal stands condoned. First Appeal be registered and numbered. 5. Present application stands disposed of, accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) pnd/ca11093.10