IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 9022 of 2008 Decided on: 31.12.2010 Roshan Lal …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : None. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3. None for respondents No. 4 to 7. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : In sequel to order dated 8.12.2010, neither petitioner is present in person nor represented by any counsel. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge December 31, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?