I» THE HIGH COURT OF JODICATURS AT BILASPTO, CHHATTISCAKH ECRIT PETITION "NO. 5 I"!' OE- 2001 PETITIONER ^M-:^ .^.^>t,^- ,,b^c, ^ 1» The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Hinistry of Public4 Health ^and Family tftlelfare Chhattisgarh RaipuK f Chhattisgarh • 2• Director Public Health and I'amily Iftlelfare Department Chhattisgarh Staipur^ Chhattisgarh 3. Chief Medical and Health Officer Raipur/ Chhattisgarh BESPOSfDENT 1» Dr« Suraan Kumar Gupta Aged about 45 years S/o Shri Kishanlal Gupta R/o D/19 Sector 2, Devendra ^agar Rsipur, Chhattisgarh $ 2. The Hegistrar M.P- Adiftinistrative Tribunal Bench At/ Baipur Chhattis^garh WRIT BETITION UHDER AKTICLES 226/227 QW 7BE COHSTITOTION OF ZEIDIA ^- HSGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR: CHHATTtSGARH DIVISION BENCH CORAIVS: HON'BLE SHRI H.L DATTU, CJ. & HON'BLE SHRI V.K. SHRIVASTAVA, J. PETiTJONERS RESPONDENTS Writ Petition No.317 of 2001 The State of Chhattisgai h & others. VERSUS Dr. Suman Kumar Gupta and another. Present: Shri Prashant Mishra, Additional Adv. Gen. for the State/petitioners. ORAL ORDER [Passed on 28th February, 2007} The following oral order of the Court was passed by H.L Dattu, CJ. The State of Chhattisgarh, inter aiia ca!ls in question the interim order passed by the State Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 137of 1999. By the impugned order, the Tribunal has granted the interim order of stay in favour of the petitioners. (2) A writ Court ordinarily does not interfere with the interim order passed by the Tribunal unless and until the same is so arbitrary and without jurisdiction. In the present case, we do not find any one of the aforesaid ingredients. Therefore, this writ petition rsquires to be rejected and it is rejected. The petitioners are at liberty to raise al! such contentions raised in this petition in O.A. No. 137 of 1999 which has since been transferred to this Court from the State Administrative Tribunal and renumbered as Writ Petition. Ordered accordingiy. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- V.K. Shrivatava Judge