IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37890 of 2010 1. PAPPU KUMAR @ PAPPU RAI 2. KANGLI KUMARI 3. SIDHESHWAR RAI 4. CHINTA DEVI -----------------------------PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 4.3.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners are Dewar, unmarried Nanad, father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased, alleged for killing informant’s daughter by administering poison due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry of Rs. 30,000/-. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that marriage solemnised eight years ago and demand was made only one year earlier to the incident. Further submission is that difference was there in between the wife and husband as husband was drunkard, had beaten the deceased who consumed poison but only to cast pressure petitioners have also been made accused in the case. Husband is in jail custody. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in Bakhtiarpur P.S. Case No. 197/2010, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)