IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34865 of 2008 LEDHU SINGH @ LODHU SINGH S/O MUNNA SINGH, R/O VILLAGE- NADIYAMA, P.S. RAMGARA, DISTRICT- LAKHISARAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 18/11/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel representing the State and learned counsel for the informant. The informant has alleged that about night Ojha Singh, Jai Prakash Singh, Daya Nand Singh and Guddu Singh came and took away Nilesh. The informant followed and saw that Nilesh was tide and at the behest of Daya Nand Singh Ojha Singh resorted firing. Later on Daya Nand Singh and Guddu Singh, Jai Prakash Singh also fired. Again Daya Nand Singh and Ojha Singh fired. Submission is that according to the FIR, the petitioner is not the assailant. The assailants are described in the FIR itself. Opposing the prayer for bail the learned counsel for the informant submitted that in course of investigation two witnesses have been examined in paragraph nos. 26 and 27 of the case diary and they have stated that the petitioner has also fired. The deceased had a number of ante mortem injuries and the shooters are described in the FIR itself. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Ledhu Singh @ Lodhu Singh is directed to be - 2 - released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M., Lakhisarai in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 220 of 2006. avin Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)