IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2011 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 33168 of 2011(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- RAMESAN.M.T, AGED 43, S/O. T.K. THANKAPPAN, LECTURER, DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, RESIDING AT MANAMEL HOUSE, MEVELLOOR.P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 609. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.IBRAHIM SMT.K.P.AMBIKA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM- 673 635. 2. THE SYNDICATE, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM - 673 635. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN/VICE CHANCELLOR PIN - 673 635. 3. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM - 673 635. BY S.C. SHRI SANTHOSH MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX EXT.P1-TRUE COPY OF MEMO DATED 29.9.2005 APPOINTING PETITIONER AS LECTURER IN CHEMISTRY EXT.P2-TRUE COPY OF ORDER OF APPOINTMENT DT.4.11.2005 EXT.P3-TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DT.5.7.2011 EXT.P4-TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC 16646/2010 DT.26.9.2011 EXT.P5-TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PAGES OF THE MINUTES OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT.21.10.2011 // TRUE COPY // P.S. TO JUDGE T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 33168 of 2011-U - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 13th day of December, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner seeks for a direction to the first respondent University to declare his probation in the post of Lecturer. It is the case of the petitioner that pursuant to Ext.P1 order of appointment, he joined the Department on 1.10.2005. By Ext.P2, the third respondent issued orders according sanction for the scale of pay and placed him on probation for a period of one year within a continuous period of two years. What remains is to declare the probation. It is averred that the petitioner has filed various representations in the matter and one the representations have been produced as Ext.P3. It is further averred in the writ petition that disputes were pending before this Court with regard to certain appointments and it is presumably because of that, the petitioner's case also is also not being considered. 2. Heard learned Standing Counsel for the University. 3. It is submitted that the Syndicate will have to take a decision in the matter. Therefore, there will be a direction to the first respondent to place the matter before the Syndicate and the Syndicate will take an appropriate WPC. 33168/2011 - 2- decision expeditiously, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/