HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD Criminal Petition No.6890 of 2009 Dated : 02.09.2009 Between : Gulam Khader Jeelani ….. Petitioner a n d 1) Shaik Hussain 2) The State of A.P. ….. Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD Criminal Petition No.6890 of 2009 and Crl.P.M.P.No.6584 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner and the first respondent are present in person and they are identified by Sri P.Vamsheedhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Aadesh Varma, learned counsel for the first respondent. Sri A.Ramesh, learned counsel representing the learned Public Prosecutor for the second respondent, is also heard. The petitioner and the first respondent also filed Crl.P.M.P.No.6584 of 2009 to permit them to compound the offences and the very criminal petition is filed only to quash the proceedings on the strength of the said compromise and settlement of all the disputes. The parties stated before the Court also that they compromised their disputes and that the criminal proceedings may be closed. The disputes are purely personal in nature not involving any public policy and any continuance of the criminal proceedings will be a futile exercise in view of the compromise. The inherent jurisdiction has to be invoked to quash the proceedings by taking a pragmatic view. Hence, the Crl.M.P.No.6584 of 2009 is allowed. Accordingly, the further proceedings in crime No.212 of 2009 of Central Crime Station, Hyderabad, are quashed against the petitioner and the criminal petition is allowed. The parties are informed. ______________________ G.BHAVANI PRASAD, J 2nd September, 2009 SUR