1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.186 OF 2009 Mrs. Anita Rameshwar Pradhan .... Applicant Vs. Rameshwar Piraji Pradhan .... Respondent S/Shri Deepak S. Paikrao i/b Sushant Kamble for the Applicant. None for the Respondent. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JUNE 10, 2010 P.C: This is an application for transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No.8 of 2009 from the Court of Civil Judge, S.D., Nagpur to the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai where the applicant's M.J. Petition No.C-22 of 2009 is pending. Notice had been issued to the respondent-husband who has also filed his reply. By this reply the respondent has stated that the applicant had not referred to the pendency of the marriage petition before the Family Court at Bandra in the written statement which she has filed before the Civil Judge, S.D., Nagpur. That cannot result in an 2 inference that there is no such marriage petition pending before the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai. Considering the difficulties expressed by the applicant in travelling to Nagpur and also the statement of the learned counsel for the applicant that the learned Civil Judge, S.D., Nagpur has not issued any order about the litigation expenses or the expenses for travel of the applicant, the present application is allowed. The Hindu Marriage Petition No.8 of 2009, pending before the learned Civil Judge, S.D., Nagpur, is transferred to the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai where M.J. Petition No.C-22 of 2009 is pending. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)