IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.57598-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: NOVEMBER 14, 2006 Santosh ...PETITIONER VERSUS State of Punjab and another ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.N.S.Gill, AAG, Punjab. Mr.R.K.Singla, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ... Petitioner Santosh apprehending her arrest in a non-bailable offence in complaint Annexure P-6 dated 20.2.2002 filed by respondent No.2, has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail. I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR. This order may be read in continuation of the earlier order dated September 22, 2006. Counsel for the petitioner contends that in terms of the aforesaid interim order, the petitioner has appeared before the trial Court and furnished her regular bail bonds which have been accepted and attested and since then she is regularly appearing. These fact have not been disputed by the State counsel. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the same is made absolute. Disposed of accordingly.a November 14, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE