1 Criminal Application No.1001/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1001 OF 2011 Ashok Rupa Patil ... APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ... RESPONDENT ..... Shri Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate for applicant Shri V.H. Dighe, A.P.P. for respondent ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 1st April, 2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard. Counsel for the accused/ applicant submits that in Crime No.40/2009 of the Faizpur Police Station, for identical accusations, the accused/ applicant was in fetters and has been released by the Court in Application No.1239/2010 moved before the learned Sessions Judge at Jalgaon, by order dated 2.12.2010. Counsel has produced certified copy of the order dated 2.12.2010, taken on record. 2. Having gone through the said certified copy, it is difficult to accede to the proposition of learned A.P.P. that said FI.R. No. 2 Criminal Application No.1001/2011 40/2009 was relating to earlier year and for subsequent year Crime No.4/2011 is registered. 3. The amount to which reference is given, not credited, instances are quoted, need not be multiplied for second offence as the complainant knew what was the mishap in the management of the affairs by the accused when he was a Manager. Consequently, the interim protection dated 11.3.2011 is made absolute with attendance condition to remain in force till 31st July 2011. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/cri1001.11