^y^- IN THE HIGH COUEI O? JOBICATURB AT BILASP8R (e.Go WRI'T PBIXTION N0. OS' 2003 BSEWEEIS surendra Brasad aianna , aged abou'fc 46 years* 3/o liSbs Shri Sund®1"I^l Sliaana* Occupation aBrdar ( Ecaihari ) Gentral Jai.1 Raipur, sehsll and Eti.strlct Raipur (CG). resident of Jall Une, Qxiarter No.1/43 Balpur* Tehsil Bistrict-'&ipur (CG) .«i>%^"' •^"K^c^" ^;^-{ ^-v,' '^•y"^^'c3i"ff , -^'c.^O'y.9-"' >< ., yL'..-^-/"-" ISlSITICSHgg ^.^p^ y^'\ A B B, y6.*' 2. 3. *ai®Sfcats of cSibattlsgarht airough tfae SecretaryDepartnsnt of a>me Affairs/ Jall aad ffl-ansportation, Mantralay, D.K.SoBuilding,, Baipiur, Tdisil and Bistri.et Baipur (CG). 'ttie Director General ®fEbllce & Bispecter General of Jails, CShhattisgarh, Bai.pur, Sehsil and Distrlet Balpur (CG). •Fhe si%aarinteru3ent of Jall, Central Jailt Kaiptu"> TAsil an<3 Bistrict Eaipiir. MiBhd. Khalil Khan . lifardaF/B-abari, Sub Jall ^endra !0ad» Bistrict Bilaspur ICG)<> BBSBplTOEm'S WKIT EETITXON WXBfi AE'CICa.BS 226/227 QS' THE COHSTITOTION O? IHBIA T X'-HC- •^-fE^e;! '-? n"aS31R •<i!'iil<n4, 0Tll-LI'|(a, ..W.:£:.ri.o..-....3..<?.13..J..2 .3 n '-frtiCTT n re 3ifgB3i!t Shri S.K. Thomas, c^unsel forjlie petitioner. Dr. N.K. Shukla, Addi|ional Advocate General for respondeats n:1 1 to3/State. By ttus petitioa filed tjnderArtlcle 226/227 ofthe Cc.nstitutiou (Anncxurc P/ 1) by which 4C Raipur to Sub-Jail Pcndra. PetLtioner v?as ^^orkin^ waa aUo^ved twice to reapoi (2) of Rule 208 of fhe one cu-cle to another AaUenged fhe order dated 10/09/2003 Warder at Central Jail, Raipur. Tmie to file the retum, but rehim has iiot Leamed couiisel for tijie petitioner subniits that in view of the siib £iilMauual, a Warier caunot be traiisfen-ed ircle unless showiiig special circum.staiices or on fhe ground of mutuafl transfer wifh fhe consent of tlie Warieis. In fhis case, fhe pro(;edure as envisaged ia sub-rule (2) of Ruls 208 of fhe JaU Mauual, h|as not been foUowed aiid Dr, N.K.ShuIda, Additional Advocate Gener^l fairly subinitted fhat the GovsrD-ment aas alrcady been nioved for c T~ -:—''g 's^ -^.nw^, 0T!lyi<o, 1~"-?'. 36<'( ^sy' •^ \'^< \ w c^ RiS'?fe3T^R?rc iTstRn.si^i sub-i-ale (2) ofR lile 208 of JaiE Manuai aad fhat is uader Having heard leanied cjauusel for the parties and havtng regard to the facts and circum.stances a fit case Respo^dent ao.2. Therefore, fhe pptinoiier is to niake a dctafled fcprcsentation to thc Rcspondcnt no.2. raisiag all hls gricvaiiccs •("ritlujtt a pcriod of 10 days iroin today emd fhc Respondent shall decide the a reasoned oixler within period representation in the light ofs and consideruig aU fhe poiats Wifh tlie direction afoil Consequenfly, M.W.P.No.2822 Parties are entifled for cd of the case. I am of fhe oninion th&t it is to maKe a aine in an objecti.ve aiaiuier by passing a of one inonth &osa. the date of receiot of ^ib-mle (2) ofRule 208 offhe Jafl Maaual baised by tbe petitioner, esaid, fhe writ petttion is disposed of. / 2003 also stands disposed of. rtified copy ofthis order. Sd/- ..c.