IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21980 of 2008 ANAMUL HAQUE Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 11/7/2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the State. Though, petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. of Hussainganj (M.H. Nagar) P.S. Case No. 35 of 2006 registered for the offence under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, but during investigation his name transpired, as the brother of the deceased disclosed that the deceased have gone to meet Anamul (petitioner) with a Demand Draft in the name of Murtaza, as Enamul had assured to make arrangement for some job and except that, there is no other evidence against the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner submits that similarly situated persons namely, Md. Murtaza and Azimul have been granted anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. No. 43903 of 2007 and 38136 of 2007 respectively. Considering this fact, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner Anamul Haque is allowed in connection with Hussainganj (M.H. Nagar) P.S. Case No. 35 of 2006 in case of his arrest or surrender before the court below within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C. S.Ali (Mridula Mishra, J.)