/ @ “((6 N 5&HE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAmURE AT BTLASH‘JR (C.G.) I mama. 120i m 2062 EETWEBE Vimal Kmar Jaiswal S/o Laxmi Prasad Jaiswal, aged about 30 years, msment'of Village Adhbharh. Tahsil MalkhaMa Eistrict Janjgir champa. PETITIOKER K‘ND .1,’ a? me state of whattisqarh, hf, Threugh the Secretary nepartment of Panchayat Mantralay, B.K.S. Builéing. Raipur. wahsu and matrict Raipur (cs).~ 1.‘ 23 me collector Janjgir champa Distrxct Janjgir mumpa. 3; Janpad Panchayat mlkharoda Through its m1ief mecutive Officer. Malkharoda, Bistrict Janjgir Champa. RES FONDm5 ,x " yr TTUEIeN O ml ;;..;;Awm£§; 1 Q‘ Jana a / cm$I F § , akEVMWwI/mi/ 99 > m 2 r Genera]. Heard. Learned counsel for thi W.P.N0. 604/99 order dated Z been passed by this Court a passed in the present case. I objection. Counsel for the petitior. Panchayat has selected S‘iksha concerned, he was in the waiti , selected and appointed joined the Collector cancelled ’th cancellation being made by tlm candidates they preferred a W1 in the same petition interim 0: petitioners in that petition are nee certain persons had not joined their services, Janpad Panchayat passed a resolution dated 26.998 recommending It is pointed out that si continuing. \i \ Petitioner by' Shri Prashant Mishra, Advocate. State by Shri Sanjay It. Agarwal, Deputy lIAidvo/cate f ‘3 petitioner submits that in 3.3.2002 (Annexure P/7) has nd the similar order may be ,earned State counsel has no ler submits that the Janpad Karmis. So far as petitioner is ng list. The persons who were their services. But, thereafter, e appointment. .On such a Collector in respect of those it PetitiOn No. 5 173/;1998 and fder has been passed and the the names of the present \ .. ma are} mm amm WW mmmm I W“ mated?{era—R A emnamén 25.6.2002 XI—H022 m . .............................. .......W my mmmm WW§§®W $Wan§¥f petitioner to the Chief Executi not been complied with and ag has baen flied. Learned COunsel for the State pointed out that the representations have been made to the Chief ,gxecutive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, b1 State Government. / ‘ Having considered the i material available on record aJ on the merits of the case of the this Court, it would be just anc to‘the petitioner to make a dete the documents to the appropi representation is made within petitioner may be heard eitht‘ counsel, the same" shall be preferably Within a period of t receipt of the representation. Ii f the petitioner is at liberty to ch ve Officer. The said order has ‘ainst that the present petition ft it not to the Collector or\ the ‘acts and circumstances and 1d Without eXpressing further rival parties, in the opinion of l proper to give an opportunity dled representation along with ‘iate authority and if such a a month, and if required, the er personally or through his decided as early as possible hree months from the date of ‘any adverse order is passed, allenge afresh. With the aforesaid ob servations, this petition is , disposed of at this stage. n, ’ ’ Sdl- 1" Certified photocopy as per Rules. j” Fakhruddin it ”j Judge , V i: WW?