IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Review Application 710/2009 Delay Condonation Application 8245/2009 In Special Appeal No. 140 of 2009 Birendra Singh Chauhan … Petitioner Versus Secretary, U.P. Board Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, Uttar Pradesh, Allahabd And Another. … Respondents Mr. M.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for the review applicant/petitioner. Smt. Beena Pandey, Standing Counsel (U.P. Govt.), for the respondent no. 1. Date of order : 1.7.2011 Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. In 2009, a writ petition was filed seeking a direction to rectify the date of birth of the petitioner. Petitioner retired from service in 1993. On the ground of delay and laches, the writ petition was dismissed by a learned Single Judge. On the self-same ground, the appeal has also been dismissed. 2. In the body of the application for review, it has not been contended that the petitioner did not retire in 1993 and that he filed the writ petition not in the year 2009. That being the situation, the application for review is wholly unwarranted, meritless and made in abuse of process of Court. 3. In filing the review application, there has been some delay. Taking into account that the review application itself is an abuse of the process of Court, we dismiss the application for condonation of delay in filing the review application. (Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 1.7.2011 1.7.2011 Prabodh