S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.5243/2006 Date : 28.11.2006 HON'BLE MR. SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. Mridul Jain for the applicant. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor for State. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the Impugned order. After hearing learned counsel for the parties while taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case and looking to the allegations levelled against the applicant which are under Section 304B IPC, presently, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, since the matter is pending investigation, I do not feel inclined to extend benefit of anticipatory bail to the applicant. Accordingly, the bail application moved by the applicant under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is rejected. However, the applicant shall be at liberty to move regular bail application before the learned trial court after filing of charge-sheet. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J.