IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.36145 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 30, 2011 Raovarinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Rajesh Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner is involved in an FIR and has approached this Court for seeking direction that his counter-version revealing offence under Section 326 IPC should be recorded. For this, the petitioner would have remedy of approaching the Court of Magistrate. It would not be appropriate to interfere in the course of investigation by issuing directions to the investigating agency to act in any particular manner. It is for the investigating agency to act in accordance with law. I am, thus, not inclined to interfere under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Dismissed. November 30, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE