THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.4207 OF 2009 DT.03.02.2011 Between: Kamar Sultan @ Kamer Hassan …………………………Petitioner Vs. K.Surender and another ………Respondents. O R D E R: This revision petition is filed by the landlady under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assailing the correctness of the order, dated 14.7.2009 passed in I.A.No.47 of 2009 in R.C.No.200 of 2007 on the file of the Additional Rent Controller, Secunderabad. The facts of the case in brief are that the petitioner filed an application under Order I Rule 10 read with Section 151 of C.P.C., seeking to implead the third party as respondent No.2 in the main R.C., and consequently permit the addition of the impleaded respondent No.2 in all the relevant places. In view of the plea taken by the respondent about the proprietoryship of the tenant and also the fact that neither the second respondent nor its proprietor in his personal capacity are the tenants, the court below dismissed the said application. The objections which were raised with regard to the other steps, can be taken recourse to only after allowing the application filed by the petitioner therein. In view of the same, I do not find any justification in the order passed by the court below. Hence, the revision petition is allowed by setting aside the order passed by the court below in I.A.No.47 of 2009 in R.C.No.200 of 2007. No order as to costs. ________________ B.PRAKASH RAO J., Dt.03.02.2011 tjs