1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. APPEAL AGAINST ORDER NO. 25 OF 2008 (VIGYAPAN KI DUNIYA Vs DHARAMPETH MAHILA URBAN CREDIT COOP. & ANR.) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : AUGUST 11, 2008. 1. The challenge in this Appeal against Order is to order of temporary injunction dated 21st August, 2007, passed in Special Civil Suit No.137 of 2007 by Third Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Nagpur. By the said order the learned Judge has granted temporary injunction in favour of the respondent and has prohibited the present appellant from publishing in news item/ article concerning the respondent in their Weekly till decision of the present suit. 2. Shri Dhobale, learned Advocate, who appears for the appellant, points out that on 2nd May, 2008 this Court has granted the appellant liberty to file certain documents. He 2 further states that those documents are already supplied to other side, however, the affidavit could not be sworn and the documents remained to be tendered in the present appeal, as the appellant was unwell. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 4. This Court cannot take any particular view of the matter in appeal. If on the basis of such documents any view is taken it will definitely prejudice either of the parties. The suit is of the year 2007. Interim order is operating since more than one year. Advocate Shri Dangre informs that the matter is already fixed for evidence before the lower Court. 5. In these circumstances, without observing anything on merit, 3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Nagpur is directed to decide Special Civil Suit No.137 of 2007, as early as possible and in any case within a period of one year from the date of communication of this order. 3 6. It is made clear that all contentions made by the appellant are kept open for consideration at appropriate stage. 7. The Appeal against Order is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE RR.