PETIT‘R IONF RIT PETITION (C) No 2LE rayen Kumar;Pa‘nde‘,-IS/ Shr achana’n Pa’ndey, age aoqt v. illae Ner Pa’néhd ’n‘naal year's, Mndl, "air Tahsii () C.'G. rar, istrit Surua VERS SU /1. atelof‘Chh tisgrh hrough: the Se‘cre‘tafr epartmen n Ralpu” (C G everue isrict Collector Amblkapur Distric SurguJa (C G aSIdar, Amblkapur, strict sur«uja,«(c;r II W IL / Pé ,y,o i‘ A Sidd d b 30 R/o Vg a ev Naka, Ambikgpur, Aiibi’k’pu Dc gj St’f a, T y, Dt §of Rl, Bhawa ) \ Dt t ) Thl Di gG.) DK-S w QM QMs/y, mm Wt 200 m .......................... L ..................... mm MW mmmw ' WW wW WW V %a11?‘rqan%a1 SB Hon’ble Shn Mamndra Mohan Shnvastavaz‘k 09-05-2011 Shn Rahul Mishra oounsel foil the peut‘voner Shn Ajit Smgh Panel Lawyer br the state By thls petltlen the petition h s called} m question the cerrectness and validity of order dated 5/1/2011 pass by the Tahsddar by which petitioner's ~ application for grant of domimle cert cate has been retected Leamed counsel for the pe"oner submm that the pehtloner has t moved an appllcatron for grant of do mile cerhfcate smtrng that his spouse Is ., working as Shlksha Karmr How ver petmoner's application has been ,: rejected only by recording that the petitioner failed to produce educational certiflcates. ‘»« ¢V_‘ Learned counsel for the petitoner submits that the Division Beneh of this Court consideredcircular dated 7I6I07 of the State Govemment wherein f the State has defned and explai as to who are the bonatide‘ residents of the State He submits that the Tah ildar has rerected the applicahon Without of proper consideration as to wheth the petitioner is entitled to status of v y bonafde residents of the State of attisgarh, on the ground of his spouse a a h working as Shiksha Karmi since 20 ., r it . , On the other hand leamed tats counsel submitted that the circuiar. . dated 2716107 would be applicable for the purpose of consrdoring the owil ,, » status and not the domicile Be that as it may, what l fn is that the Tahsildar has not conSiderod‘ this aspect as to whether me pe' oner is entitled to status of doniioile o! .. 7 Chhattisgarh on the ground of his pouse working as Shiksha Karmi since ,. » 2007 in the tight of the applicable ovemment policy With regard to domicile certifoate Therefore it would be roper to direct the Tahsrldar to oonsider r r {View .s u: WWW‘TF” , n 0 a. petitioner's application afresh in the light of Government's circular relatmgt 7 a domicile and bonafide residents and should also consider whether on the ground of petitioner's spouse worlfng as Shrksha Karmrthe b entitled/to status of boname reSident of the S te It is made clear that this Co It has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case The author should consuder the matter after duew: > examination of the Govemment poll y and the ground on which the petitioner- has moved the application for grant fdomicile certificate; With the aforesaid ob’s'erva ons i directions, the petition is tinally ‘ : disposed off. V {11%W r a .