1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.378 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1239 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.400 OF 2002 Shridhar Paygonda Patil, since deceased through L.Rs. )..Applicants V/s. Dattu Bandu Sadale, since deceased through L.Rs. )..Respondents ---- Mr. Vaibhav Gaikwad for the applicants. ---- Coram : R.S.MOHITE,J Date : 11th January, 2010 PC CIVIL APPLICATION NO.378 OF 2009 1 Heard Advocate for the applicants. None for the respondents though served. This is an application for bringing legal heirs of respondent no.1 on record. Respondent nos.1A & 1B are said to be heirs of respondent no.1. There is 162 days delay in filing the application. However, I find that no reply is filed. In the circumstances, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses-(b) & (c). Amendment to be carried out within a period of 3 weeks from today. Civil Application is disposed off. (R.S.MOHITE,J) 2 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1239 OF 2009 1 This is an application for adding respondent no.4 as an additional respondent in the Second Appeal. All the respondents are served but none appears for them. Respondent no. 4 to be a proper party because he is the purchaser and present owner of the land. It would be desirable to hear him at the time of hearing of Second Appeal. In the circumstances, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause-(b). Amendment to be carried out within a period of one week. However, I am not inclined to grant prayer clause-(c). Hence, liberty to take out a fresh application in case there is any apprehension. Application stands disposed off. (R.S.MOHITE,J) 3