IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12176 of 2011 KUNDAN KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.13827 of 2011 AJEET KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 28.04.2011 Both the above stated petitions arise out of Brahmpura P.S. Case No. 213 of 2010 registered under Sections 414, 413, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472/34 of the Indian Penal Code and accordingly, both the above stated petitions are being disposed of by this common order. Allegedly, petitioners along with some other co-accused were caught in a vehicle which is said to be a stolen property and subsequently, some vehicles were recovered from a garage on the basis of confessional statements of petitioners and other accused. The contention of learned counsel appearing in Cr. Misc. No. 12176 of 2011 is that up-till-now the case of theft of the vehicle has not been registered and having more or less similar allegation, one co-accused has already been granted privilege of bail. It is also pointed out by him that the petitioners do not have any criminal antecedent. Similar contention is made in Cr. Misc. No. 13827 of 2011. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each 2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with above stated Brahmpura P.S. Case No. 213 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )