IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2520 of 2007 DULHIN KAULESHRY DEVI & ANR Versus SHEO RAM & ORS ----------- 7. 09.09.2009 This application has been filed on 8.10.2007 for restoration of I.A. No. 5105 of 2004 which was dismissed due to non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 14.11.2005 which directed for removal of defects in the petition within two weeks with a rider that if the defects are not removed within the period, the I.A. would stand dismissed without further reference to a Bench. Since, the peremptory order dated 14.11.2005 was not complied, the I.A. stood dismissed. For filing such a restoration petition the limitation is for 30 days. But this application has been filed on 8.10.2007 i.e. nearly one year and 11 months. As also asserted in the petition, the learned counsel says that the counsel for the petitioner had no knowledge of the peremptory order and that any notice of the order was not given to the counsel by the office. The listing of the cases are notified in the cause list by the court daily. There is no satisfactory explanation about the delay. In the facts and circumstances, I do not feel satisfied about the reason for the delay. Accordingly, the restoration application is dismissed. (C. M. Prasad, J.) Ravi/-