1 wp4290.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.4290 OF 2010 Shri Anil Tanaji Khaire : Petitioner V/s. Union of India & Ors. : Respondents .... Mr.H.D.Deshmukh for the petitioner. ... CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATE : JULY 15, 2010. P.C.: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is challenging the action of the respondents of allotment of dealership of retail outlet to the respondent no.3. Apart from other grounds, it is not in dispute that in the selection process, the petitioner had received 70 marks whereas the respondent no.3 received 96 marks. The learned counsel for the petitioner was unable to point out to us any guideline or procedure as to how the petitioner had a better claim than the respondent no.3. In the absence thereof, no case is made out for showing indulgence. 2 wp4290.10 3. Writ Petition is dismissed. (D.D. SINHA, J.) (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)