IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.19489-M of 2010 Date of Decision:28.9.2010 Sukhjinder Singh alias Bitta and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. J.B.S. Gill, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Ms. Indu Bala, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from HC Lakhwinder Singh states that since the petitioners stand convicted by the trial Court vide order dated 16.9.2010, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 28.9.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE