CW 1493/10 [1] In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.1493/2010 Smt. Anjana Rawat Versus State & Ors. Date of Order ::: 03/02/10 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Sanjay Gangawar, for petitioner Petitioner, who is working as Anganwadi worker has assailed advertisement dt.18th August, 2008 by which process was initiated by respondents, holding selection for the post of Supervisor (Female) which is included in the Schedule-II appended to Rajasthan Women & Child Development (State & Subordinate) Service Rules, 1998 (“Rules, 1998”) for being filled by direct recruitment in terms of procedure provided under Part IV of the Rules, 1998. Counsel submits that experience rendered by petitioner has not been taken note of by respondents despite there being clause in advertisement and no marks for experience have been allowed to the candidates. Advertisement dt.18/08/08 challenged by petitioner herein has been examined by this Court at principal seat Jodhpur in CWP-897/2010 (Durga Patel Vs. State & six other cognate cases) vide judgment dt.28/01/2010 wherein other conditions have also been considered. CW 1493/10 [2] However, submission made by Counsel about benefit of experience for being considered and taken note of while preparing merit, is also of no substance for the reason that vacancies have to be filled by direct recruitment in terms of procedure provided under Part IV of the Rules, 1998 and if the petitioner is eligible in terms of conditions incorporated in the avertisement, she can certainly be considered. Similar controversy has been examined and decided by this Court in CWP-1508/2010 (Smt. Shushila Devi & Ors. Vs State & Ors) vide judgment dt. 03/02/2010 ad infra:- “As regards submission with respect to experience rendered by petitioners as Anganwadi Worker, that has been taken note of by respondents in their criteria under Cl.2 and upto 10 bonus marks can be awarded based on experience and if petitioners have worked as Anganwadi Workers for last more than a decade, they must have been awarded bonus marks as against their alleged experience. However, it is not the case of petitioners that criteria for awarding of bonus marks based on their experience as Anganwadi worker has not been taken note of by respondents while laying down cut off marks of each category. As regards submission made for keeping vacancies reserved for CW 1493/10 [3] Anganwadi workers, suffice it to say that 25% posts are to be filled from Anganwadi workers by direct recruitment. As regards present advertisement dt.18/08/2008, it is only with regard to 75% of vacancies for being filled through direct recruitment from open market candidates; and whenever 25% being reserved for Anganwadi workers for being filled by direct recruitment is advertised, petitioners will certainly be considered. Since present recruitment under advertisement dt. 18/08/2008 is only meant for such applicants being open market candidates. No vacancies can be reserved for Anganwadi workers under present advertisement and their candidature can only be examined in terms of criteria laid down as per their circular dt.12/01/10.” In the light of what has been observed (supra), consequently, writ petitions fails and is hereby dismissed. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. K.Khatri/P.3/ 1493CW2010-Fb3-SprVsor-Agnwdi.doc.