IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 18917 of 2010 Date of decision: 26.05.2011 Karnail Singh and others ........ Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: None for the petitioner Mr. J S Brar, AAG, Punjab for the respondent State Mr. Munish Kumar Singla, Advocate for complainant/respondent No. 2 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the complainant/respondent No. 2 states that the petitioners have since been acquitted and as such, the present petition is rendered infructuous. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the complainant/respondent No. 2, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 26.05.2011 mohan