c^ ilEBENGH )\^f\^yis' .. ^^ »** . d **' ^•"J^ '^- ;>»" ^&^..-- A^"" RESPONDENTS IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) N0. 3 6 L( / /2010 ./•" PETITIONERS :1 Emmanuel Xalxo, S/o Nikodim Xalxo, aged about 49 years, working as Head Master, T.W.D. Middle School, Jiling, Block Jashpur, Distt. .Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS :1 'State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretaiy, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, Distt.- Jashpur (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Block -Jashpur Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 4. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account & Pension Jashpur, Distt.-Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICU; 226^0F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^•»—"-».»*^' aT/^»TT»ia an^i^T^fR; 'tmian^rg^w ,?<J 'S^ -^WM^, ®ti1'H'|(o,fsjyiyy ^M^lMM....l.0... StI^I i^Sf; (>jcli^«i<^T) TOlW^ltoaiI^T SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mdhan Shrivastava. J. 21-07-2010 Shri Somkant Vemia, Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, cotfisei for the petitioner. Pafiei Lawyer for the State/respondents. neara. Learned counsei appearir|g is entitied to benefrt of two passed B.Eu exarnination bef4 subrnitted that the issue invoi integra and the same has been in the case of Asha Saxena vs\ irir|g for the petitioner submits that the petitioner adk/ance incrernents on account of he having ^re his appointriient at his ow'n cost. it is ivjed in the present petition is no ionger t'es finaiiy decided by the Hon'bie Supreme Court StateofM.P. & Ors.. 2009 ffl'ii MPJR (SC) ivK sss It is further submitted th-al order dated 06-02-2009 pass4d counsei for the petitioner furthet 29-04-2010 passed in Vv'rit App^s ludgrnent of the Suprerne Court) order passed by this Court inl have been issued for consideitation increments as per clrcuiar datep Pradesh, after verification ofthelfacts Learned counsel for tit petitioner wouid aiso be consid^ ^it<<I<vraH ~^^i "4^^ <[^1^1< ^siRra 3ii^i this Court has aiso taken a simiiar view in its in Vv.P.(S) No.6257 of 2008. Learned uraws attention of Iftis Court to order d-ated ^a'i No.124 of 2009, wherein relying upon the in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) and the lanother Writ Appea! No.87/2009, uirections of the case for grant of two advance ti 21-09-1874 issueu bv the State of Madhya pleaded in the petition. te respondents submits that case of the red on the sarne iines. 1 "•%•>—^ XI-HC—78 3 T •^I<<I<YI<<, eittlyie, fsidiyy ^...^..^^LU^ c> STRWra^i' sn^i^rfew ^W 3?T^T^)^FI% MC De=titi roiwdto aiT^r ^- In view of the statement off with a direction to the respo claim of the petitioner for grani dated 21-09-1874 issued bythe the facts pieaded in the petition \ (riade above, this petjtion Is fjnaiiy disposed i&dent authorities to consider and decide the of two advance increments as per circular ptate of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of ^ithin a period of eight weeks from today. ManindraMohanShrivastava Judge ^f<lfoT4M "RTE^f ^ ^S^ Tf^f^< ^affipTan^r J