1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR APPEAL AGAINST ORDER NO. 36 OF 2010 Vishali Dilip Ingle Vs. Prakash Deoram Kadam ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. O. Y. Kashid Adv for appellant. Mr. J. B. Gandhi Adv for respondent-1. Mr. Shrikant Saoji Adv for respondent -2. CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL J. DATED: 8 th JULY, 2010. Heard finally. 2. Clamp of injunction not to create third party interest is tested by the defendant no.2 in A. O.. Considering the nature of controversy, and in the light of the provisions of Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, I do not see any mistake on the part of the learned Judge in putting fetters on the diposal of the property. Consequently order under challenge 2 does not require any interference. However, considering the nature of the property and the appellant defendant no.2 asserting to be a bonafide purchaser, the learned Judge shall expeditiously dispose of the case. Appeal Against Order dismissed for want of merits. JUDGE svk