IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 28TH JUNE 2011 / 7TH ASHADHA 1933 RP.No. 373 of 2011() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN LAA.476/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENT IN LAA(CLAIMANT) ------------------------------------------------- RATNABHAI, AGED 85 YEARS, D/O.DAMODARAN NAIK, RESIDING AT ARACKKAL, CHIRAKKAKAM, VARAPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.SADANANDAN (SREEMOOLANAGARAM) SRI.S.ASHOK KUMAR. SRI.NOEL JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANT IN LAA (RESPONDENT) -------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM. BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. V.T.K.MOHANAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ----------------------------------------------- RP. No. 373 of 2011 in LAA. No. 476 of 2010 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of June, 2011 O R D E R Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Our judgment dated 16-8-2010 is sought to be reviewed on the ground that this Court has in subsequent judgment in LAA. No. 572 of 2009 pertaining to acquisition for the purpose of National Highway 17 approved the enhancement by 112% over what was awarded by the LAO. According to us, a subsequent judgment fixing higher value on the basis of the evidence available in that case cannot be a ground for reviewing an earlier judgment. At any rate, it is clear to us that the case covered by LAA. 572 of 2009 was in respect of acquisition of land for a superior category. We notice that this Court has granted different rates of enhancement in properties included by the LAO in different categories. We don't find any ground for review. RP is dismissed in limine. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) (C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE) ksv/-