IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2010 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 361 of 2010(S) ---------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.160/2009 Dated 29/01/2009 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER ------------------------------------ K.P. SIYAD, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.K.P. ABDUL LATHEEF, PEARL HOUSE, VAZHICHERRY, ALAPPUZHA, (PROPRIETOR, A.S. TRADERS, WARD NO. 10 OF PUNNAPRA SOUTH PANCHAYATH, NEAR FISH LANDING CENTRE) BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS -------------------------------------------- 1. A. AKBAR, AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALAPPUZHA. 2. M.K. RAJESH, AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE S.I OF POLICE, PUNNAPRA POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA. BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.Chelameswar, C.J. & C.N.Ramachandran Nair, J. ------------------------------------------ Cont. Case (C) No.361 of 2010 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 6th day of April, 2010 JUDGMENT C.N.Ramachandran Nair, J. Even though the petitioner is alleging violation of the judgment, the learned Government Pleader submitted that the petitioner's industrial unit is not functioning and, therefore, there is no necessity to offer any police protection or assistance. Learned counsel for the petitioner also does not dispute the fact that the industrial unit now remains closed. As and when the petitioner is able to run the industrial unit, he can inform the schedule of commencement of operation to the police, namely the second respondent, who will provide sufficient police protection in terms of the judgment. Contempt case is disposed of as above. J.Chelameswar, Chief Justice C.N.Ramachandran Nair, Judge vns