1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.634 OF 2007 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1996 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.1449 OF 2007 Vivek Enterprises & Anr. .. Appellants. Versus Parmeshwari Devi Ruia & Ors. .. Respondents. WITH APPEAL (L) NO.746 OF 2007 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1996 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.1449 OF 2007 Krishna Kunj Welfare Association .. Appellants. Versus Parmeshwari Devi Ruia & Ors. .. Respondents. WITH APPEAL (L) NO.750 OF 2007 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1996 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.1449 OF 2007 Krishnakumar Nathmal Murarka .. Appellants. Versus Parmeshwari Devi Ruia & Ors. .. Respondents. Dr.Vierndra Tulzapurkar with Ms.Alpana Ghone i/by M/s.Kanga & Co. for the appellants in Appeal No.634 of 2007. Mr.Cyrus Ardeshir i/by Desai, Desai & Carrimjee for the appellants in Appeal (L) No.746 of 2007. Mr.B.B. Parekh i/by M/s. M. Hiralal & Co. for the appellants in Appeal (L) No.750 of 2007. Mr.Hemant Sethi with Mr.Arun Siwach i/by Amarchand & Mangaldar & S.A. Shroff & Co. for respondent No.1 in all three appeals. Mr.Gaurav Joshi with Ms.Deepali Thakor i/by Rustamji & Ginwala for respondent Nos.6 to 10 CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & J.P. DEVADHAR, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J. 2 DATED : 26th March, 2008 DATED : 26th March, 2008 DATED : 26th March, 2008 P.C. : 1. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 (plaintiff in Suit No.1449 of 2007) states that the matter has been fully compromised between the respondent No.1 and the appellants (defendants No.2 and 3 in the suit) and between the appellants and respondent No.20 (defendant No.21 in the suit). According to him, the principal dispute existed only between respondent No.2 (plaintiff in the suit) and respondent No.20 and the appellants. All the matters have been settled and separate consent terms with both these parties have been filed in this appeal. The suit is to be decreed in terms of the compromise vis-a-vis these parties. However, suit against all other defendants in the suit - respondents in the present appeal, are being withdrawn. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents-defendants in the suit submitted that they have no objection to this statement. 2. The agreed / consent terms for the purposes of identification are marked at X and Y respectively. Parties are stated to be present in Court. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant, respondent No.1 and respondent No.20 state that the consent terms, marked X and Y, are signed by their 3 respective clients and the advocates and pray that the appeals as well as suit be disposed of in terms of the consent terms. Learned counsel for the parties state that the defendant No.1 and the plaintiff have no claims against each other in relation to the subject matter of the suit. 3. In view of above, consent terms X and Y are permitted to be taken on record. Decree in terms thereof be drawn. Consent terms marked X and Y shall form part of the decree. The appeals and the suit vis-a-vis other respondents-defendants in the suit is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Appeal No.634 of 2007 and the suit No.1449 of 2007 accordingly stands disposed of with no order as to costs. Appeal (L) No.746 of 2007 and Appeal (L) 750 of 2008 be registered and the same also stand dismissed in view of this order. CHIEF JUSTICE J.P. DEVADHAR, J.