In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No.6683 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision:October 29, 2010 Avtar Singh ---Petitioner versus Baldev Singh and another ---Respondents Coram: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH *** Present: Mr.Hemant Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner *** GURDEV SINGH, J. Heard. This revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner-defendant, Avtar Singh, against the order dated 28.8.2010 passed by Civil Judge(Junior Division), Patti, vide which his application for leading secondary evidence for proving the existence, condition and contents of the agreement dated 20.2.2006, was dismissed. As per the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, the plaintiff filed suit for specific performance of the agreement dated 31.1.2006 and that as per the terms and conditions of that agreement, the sale deed was to be executed in favour of the other party by 29.5.2006. The agreement dated 20.2.2006 is being put forward by the petitioner/defendant in order to show that the plaintiff was not ready and willing to perform his Civil Revision No.6683 of 2010(O&M) -2- part of the contract. A perusal of this agreement is not relevant for deciding the controversy between the parties. The same was executed even before the expiry of the date fixed for execution of the sale deed. When the document itself is not relevant, it cannot be said that the trial court committed any illegality while dismissing the application of the petitioner-defendant for leading secondary evidence for proving that agreement. Revision petition is dismissed accordingly. (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE October 29, 2010 PARAMJIT