1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. ORDER Karan @ Babu Vs. The State of Rajasthan SB CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.409/2008. Under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. DATE OF ORDER: 21st July, 2008. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. PATHAK Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav for the petitioner. Mr. B.K. Sharma PP for the State. BY THE COURT: By this revision petition under Section 12 read with section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (for short, 'the Act'), the petitioner has sought bail in Criminal Case No.46/2005 for the offence under section 147, 148, 149, 307, 352, 336 and 353 IPC. It is contended that during the course of trial after grant of bail, the accused petitioner did not turn up and his natural guardian also did not turn up. It is also contended that one opportunity is required to be given to the accused-petitioner. On the other hand, it is submitted that the accused petitioner after release on bail in the year 2005 committed similar type and even more graver offences, therefore, indulgence of bail is not required to be given to him unless he fulfills the requirement of section 12 of the Act. 2 I have considered the submissions made before me and perused the impugned order dated 18.2.2008 passed by the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Ajmer and also the order dated 22.2.2008 passed in appeal by the learned Sessions Judge, Ajmer. It appears that in all there are 17 cases pending against the accused-petitioner for similar type of nature and even some cases are of more serious nature. It appears that after release on bail, the accused-petitioner got involved in such type of matters. The learned Magistrate found that there are all chances that after release on bail he shall be in the company of hardened criminals. The satisfaction of the Principal Magistrate does not appear to be without any substance. The learned Sessions Judge in appeal has also confirmed the order rejecting the bail to the accused. After having considered the submissions made before me, I do not find any reason to give indulgence of bail to the accused-petitioner. The revision petition is devoid of merit and is liable to be dismissed. In the result, the revision petition stands dismissed. (S.P. PATHAK,J)