:1: :1: :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. SUIT NO. 1124 OF 1981 United Commercial Bank ...Plaintiffs. vs. Maugta Engg. Works P.Ltd ...Defendants. Ms. M.R. Patel for the plaintiffs. for the plaintiffs. for the plaintiffs. None for the defendants. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 17TH FEBRUARY, 2006. DATE : 17TH FEBRUARY, 2006. DATE : 17TH FEBRUARY, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. There is not R & P in the matter. The plaintiff’s advocate is not appearing. Learned counsel for the plaintiff state that they are not appearing in this matter for the defendants. BY my order dated 10.2.2006 notices were issued to the advocates. However Some of the advocates are not served. Balance of the notices have returned :2: :2: :2: back with various remarks such as ‘Office shifted’ etc. In view of the fact that there is no R & P either in the court or with the parties it is not possible to prosecute the present matter. In view thereof suit dismissed for default. ********