HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1360 of 2011 Date: September 16, 2011 Between: Fasalwadi Pandari Goud … Petitioner And 1. Fasalwadi Rama Goud & 7 others … Respondents * * * HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1360 of 2011 Date: September 16, 2011 O R D E R: Aggrieved by the order dated 18.01.2011 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Medak at Sangareddy, in Transfer O.P. No.122 of 2010, the third respondent therein filed the present civil revision petition. By the said order, the court below allowed the Transfer O.P. and withdrew O.S. No.305 of 2007 from the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Sangareddy, and transferred it to the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Sangareddy, to be tried and adjudicated along with O.S. No.371 of 2007 pending before it. 2. Perusal of the order under revision reflects that the court below accepted the petition filed by the petitioners, respondents 1 to 4 herein, under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure for transfer of O.S. No.305 of 2007 pending before the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Sangareddy to the learned Senior Civil Judge, Sangareddy, to be clubbed along with O.S. No.371 of 2007 pending before the learned Senior Civil Judge, Sangareddy. This was because the court below found that the parties to both the suits were one and the same and the property claimed in both the suits was also one and the same. Thus, being of the opinion that the petition required to be allowed to avoid contradictory judgments, the court below allowed the Transfer O.P. 3. Though it is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent 3 in the Transfer O.P., that the property in the two suits is not one and the same, the boundaries of the plaint schedule property in O.S. No.305 of 2007 reflect that the said property was included as item No.5 in the other suit, O.S. No.371 of 2007. In that view of the matter, the court below did not commit any error warranting interference by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution. 4. The Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merit and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ____________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J Date: September 16, 2011. BSB