( 1 ) Cri.Appln5223-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5223 OF 2010 Raju Venkati Jadhav & another APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & another RESPONDENTS .... Mr. R.P. Bhumkar, advocate for the applicants. Mr. D.V. Tele, APP for the respondent/State. .... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 21st December, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. There is categorical assertion in the FIR that the applicants alongwith other accused persons assaulted the first informant. It appears that brother of the first informant, by name Raju Rathod, sustained injuries on the head and neck. He was rather serious and was irrelevantly blurting out something. It is true that there is delay in filing of the FIR. Yet, the delay is explained in view of the fact that ( 2 ) Cri.Appln5223-10 brother of the informant was required to be shifted from one private hospital to another private hospital. No case for anticipatory bail is made out. The application is, therefore, dismissed. [V.R. KINGAONKAR] JUDGE NPJ/criapln5223-10