SCA/1609/1994 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 1609 of 1994 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL ========================================= = 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================= = SHREE KARSANI J. BRAHMAKSHATRIYA VIDYARTHI BHAVAN Versus SHRI PUJYA RANCHHODDASJI MAHARAJ KELVANI AND SANSKRUTIK AND OTHERS ========================================= =Appearance : MS SANGITA PAHWA for MR PM THAKKAR for the Petitioner NOTICE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 1, RULE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 2 - 5. ========================================= = CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL Date : 25/03/2008 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. The petitioner has preferred the present petition for challenging the order passed by the learned District Judge in Civil Misc. Application No.37 of 1993, whereby application Exh.21 is allowed and the lower Court is directed to expedite the hearing of SCA/1609/1994 2/2 JUDGMENT Rent Suit No.149 of 1987 within a period of six months from the date of the order. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner is not in position to declare as to whether the suit is disposed of or not. However, she submitted that the information is sent to his client, but the same is not received. Even otherwise also, the direction is given by the learned District Judge to decide the suit within the period of six months and, therefore, it cannot be said that any serious prejudice would be caused to the petitioner. The petitioner may raise all defence which may be available in the proceedings of the dispute in accordance with law. Hence, the petition is disposed of accordingly. Rule is discharged. No order as to cost. (JAYANT PATEL, J.) omkar