IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30578 of 2010 KRISHNA PRASAD @ RAJIV RANJAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc.No. No. 30537 of 2010 JAWAHARLAL PRASAD VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 4.1.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners are father and son. Allegation against them is about creating and using a forged document to get mutated land of their Pattidar. Informant’s grievance is that his wife’s signature is forged along with seal of Mukhiya. Defence is about issuance of certificate by Mukhiya with her signature and seal is a mater to investigate but in both cases liability of petitioners is not minimized as the document is forged one. If Mukhiya’s signature is genuine then liability can be extended to Mukhiya also. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioners is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)