s> ...-^ ..(/ (f .€>' IH THE-HIGH'COEIKS E!F gUDie&KtRE-^LBSI&SP^CeHm^ISG&R^. i^SXIr:PETITX©fcN©. • '^ u—/2002 PETITIffltER ^^•.•^^^sss B:M'it»5^8 «9' ***^•" ,.^y tv%Sgg6@EN2S &5^—~ Suman aaj BahadurSl Aged 40 years»i S/o» Prera Prakash Bahadur^i R/0. Shanti Nagar*' Irrigatioa Colony» Ralpur (C.G») Vs. !•' Sta-te of Chha't-bisgarb»: Through Secretary,! Wa-ter Resoiurces, Raipur (C.G.) 2» Chief Engineer,; Mi.nl Ma-fca Bango Project," Bllaspur (C.G») 3. Superintending Engineer,; Canal Division 2, Jaajgir»; Disti JanJgir-CIiaitrpa (C«G») PETXTieN-'ETSBEB'ARTieLE 227_-RE&@' WITH ARTieEE 226 OE" THE GONSTITCTTION GF INBI& FOR ISSUAHeE_aF WRW IS THE N&TOEE d?r eESTzeeARZ, maMETs,_ PROHXBITXQK &NB FOR OTHER SUI'E&BLE WRIS • OR M&XTS,_LDIREeTION _OR DIRECTIONS, ORDBR OR ORDERS XI-HC—78 sf^s w Rs-ii'* OTI 311^1 iBlife ^- ys^'*ii<<i<n<<, aTilyic, fsi<fli'H'^< ^ ^ ffi a .. ./ ^// <rz_ WRCTI »i*lieb am^l'q^ ('^S^1') Hedrd Shri Manindra Shrivit 5hri Ayaz N'aved, 6oyt. Advocate, 5y th is petition filed under of India the petitioner seeks to DQSssd bv ths MQdhvci PrQdssh -i by which the learned Tribunai cnai petitioner by which the (Annexure-A/1). petiti.or|er The petitioner was suspend crimirial case,cnd for that'challan of Chtef Judicial AAagistrate. (Cfassification, Contro.I <& yAppeal employee remains in Jait for mor> suspended automaticaily. The pe' Section 420 of the Indian Penal 48 hours. Therefore, he wus su; which he chc.ilenged before the ledi SRFt¥?i^ft;i^nHClf T? 1^T3^ ^l^i-! ^sifm aii^i stava, counsel fpr the petitioner or the Section 226/227 of the Constitution ipilenge the order dated. 28/03/2002 5+ate .4dmiriistrative Tr'ioungl, Raipur dismissed the application of the challenaed his susoension order id on cccount of his.involvement'in a ^•ttS qlso fiied against hjm in the Cour-t ftule 9 of the M.P. Ciyi! Seryices Rules, 1966 proyides that if aoy •fc thai 48 hours then he has to be i'itioner was involved in a case under (Jode and he was in jail for more 1-han Ipended by the competent authopt+y, •ned Tribunai. B; XI-HC—78 '3^.'<iKf)<fl'll, ©•al'y'is,fsicii'yy WHW «>*l|eb ••^200 •^ 3(!^'?I '(R^ ( Yll^'i.6!) sn^i vi W* an^ispiw SUSi Since the petitioner was provisions of th®Rule on account and on acceunt of the fdct that K hours, therefore, by dismissing t| learned Tribunal has not commitlt'ed passing tiie i.mpugned order.. We As such, the same is luble tQ bs di4 Chief.Justice <i<bi^41't *i[H<riT ^ ^zt <ni^rJ ^; siRn s^v jSpended in view^ of the mandatory icf his involvement in a criminai case ie remained in jail for more than 4S p'e appiication of the petitioner the any illegaiity or irregularity in not find any force in this petition. missed and it is dismissed. do Sd/- LC.BhaddQ »"• •:9Klf s ""'^-af/