THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8589 of 2011 Date: 30.3.2011 Between: B. Narender Rao ..... PETITIONER AND The Government of A.P. through Department of Education, Infrastructure Development Corporation, rep. by its Managing Director, Hyderabad and others.. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Nyayapathi Prashant Counsel for Respondents : Mr. Andapalli Sanjeev Kumar The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8589 of 2011 Order: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents dated 26.6.2010 in block listing his name and suspending him from participating in the tenders of any department of Government on e-procurement is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to bid documents and violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Art.14 & 21 of the Constitution of India and direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to participate in any tender invited for the work and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” At the hearing, when this Court pointed out that the petitioner has not challenged the impugned action, whereby, he is purported to have been blacklisted, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that a copy of the order has not been served on his client. Sri Andapalli Sanjeev Kumar, learned counsel representing the respondents submitted that the purported proceedings, which are described as an order blacklisting the petitioner in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition is only a show cause notice and that a separate order was passed invalidating the key of the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, sought for permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to his client to challenge the order referred to by the learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition to question the order, by which, the key was invalidated by filing the same along with the writ petition. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition, W.P.M.P. No. 10673 of 2011 is disposed of as infructuous. __________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY,J DATE: 30th March, 2011 pnb