IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.538 of 2007 Ram Chandra Prasad S/.o Late Poshan Prasad resident of Village Chakraza Samsuddin P.S. Mahesi Dist. East Champaran Defendant- Petitioner Versus 1. Madan Prasad Singh S/o Late Suraj Prasad Singh resident of Village Bakhari Najir P.S. Mahesi Dist. East Champaran Plaintiff-Opposite party 2. Kripa Shankar Prasad Singh @ Arvind Kumar Singh @ Kripa Shankar Singh S/o Madan Prasad Singh resident of Village Bakhari Najir P.S. Mahesi Dist. East Champaran 3. Ram Chandra Bhagat S/o Late Raghu Bhagat 4. Baijnath Sah S/o Late Rupchand Sah resident of Village Chakraza Samsuddin P.S. Mahesi Dist. East Champaran 5. Shyam Sahni S/o Late Chalitar Sahni Singh resident of Village Bakhari Najir P.S. Mahesi Dist. East Champaran 6. Krishna Thakur S/o Late Surjug Thakur resident of Village Chakraza Samsuddin P.S. Mahesi Dist. East Champaran 7. Kapildeo Sah S/o Late Ganour Sah 8. Janak Sah S/o Late Ram Bilash Sah both resident of Village Chakrasul P.S. Mahesi Dist. East Champaran 9. Ramchandra Sah S/o Late Damri Sah 10. Sukhdeo Sah S/o Late Ganour Sah resident of Village Chakrasul P.S. Mahesi Dist. East Champaran 11. Shailesh Kumar S/o Ramchandra Prasad resident of Village Chakraza Samsuddin P.S. Mahesi Dist. East Champaran 12.Yogendra Sah S/o Shiv Baran Sah 13.Binod Kumar Sah S/o Yogendra Sah both resident of Village Bakhari Najir P.S. Mahesi Dist. East Champaran 14.Satya Narayan Prasad 15.Hari Narayan Prasad 16.Deo Narayan Prasad all sons of Late Yugeshwar Bhagat Singh resident of Village Bathana P.S. Mahesi Dist. East Champaran 17.Uma Shankar Pd. Singh S/o Madan Pd. Singh Singh resident of Village Bakhari Najir P.S. Mahesi Dist. East Champaran Defendants- Opposite Party ----------- 02 10.09.2009 1. This civil revision has been filed by defendant-petitioner challenging order dated 07.12.2006 by which learned Subordinate Judge VIII, East Champaran allowed the application for amendment of the plaint filed by plaintiff- opposite party no.1 in Title Suit no. 355 of 1986. - 2 - 2. The aforesaid suit was filed by plaintiff-opposite party no.1 for declaration that the sale deeds executed by a minor namely, Kripa Shankar Prasad Singh (defendant no.1) in favour of other defendants were non-est and void and also for declaration of his title over the suit land as well as for other ancillary reliefs. In the said suit defendants appeared and contested. 3. Subsequently an application dated 03.07.2006 was filed on behalf of plaintiff for amendment of the plaint with regard to subsequent event regarding his dispossession during the pendency of the suit on 01.06.2006 and for amendment of valuation and relief etc. in accordance thereof. The said application was contested by the defendant-petitioner who filed his rejoinder on 07.08.2006. 4. The learned court below considered all the facts and circumstances and came to the conclusion that the amendment proposed was simple and formal in nature and was necessary due to subsequent event as claimed by the plaintiff which has to be decided at the time of final decision of the suit. It has also found that there was no delay in the matter and in case of subsequent event such amendment can not be rejected as a straight jacket formula. 5. The impugned order of the learned court below appears to be well considered, legal and proper and there is no jurisdictional error therein. Accordingly, this civil revision is dismissed. shahid (S.N.Hussain, J)