: 1 : USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER OF SUMMONS NO. 835 OF 2009 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 475 OF 2001 Amit Vaswani .. Plaintiff v/s. Pravin Meghani & Ors. .. Defendants And Deepak Pravin Meghani ... Respondent ......... Mr. R.N. Kachare for the plaintiff Mr. S.J. Khera for the defendants ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 17th JUNE, 2010. P.C. : 1. Affidavit of reply is filed by the respondent. By this chamber summons, plaintiff wants that respondent be brought on record as a Manager of P. H. Meghani HUF. This chamber summons was required to be taken, as the earlier Manager of the said HUF Mr. : 2 : Pravin Meghani has expired. 2. After having heard learned advocates on both sides, I have noticed that on the earlier occasion, Chamber Summons No.34 of 2008 was taken out. The same was allowed to be withdrawn and the present chamber summons is taken out. No doubt, there is a delay in taking out the chamber summons however, reasons mentioned in the affidavit in support of the chamber summon controverted in reply considered together makes me to hold that this chamber summons can be granted. 3. It was contended across the bar by learned advocate Mr. Khera that the respondent has not received any benefit on account of death of the earlier Manager Mr. Pravin Meghani and he is not liable to pay any amount. This aspect will be considered naturally, when the merits of the suit would be decided. Today, I see no difficulty for granting chamber summons. Hence, the order. : 3 : ORDER (i) Chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). (ii) There shall be no order as to costs. (iii) Plaintiff to amend the plaint on or before 3rd July, 2010, serve upon learned advocate Mr. Khera amended copy of the plaint on or before 12th July, 2010. (iv) The Suit is adjourned to 19th July, 2010 for directions. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)