IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MRS.MANJULA CHELLUR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 12TH DECEMBER 2011 / 21ST AGRAHAYANA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 589 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.12418/2011 Dated 17/05/2011 .................... PETITIONER : ADDITIONAL 7TH RESPONDENT IN WPC ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- C.K.RAJU, AGED 47 YERAS, S/O.KUMARAN, CHAKKERITHARA HOUSE, CHERANELLOOR P.O., KOCHI - 682 034. BY ADV. MR. P.B.SAHASRANAMAN MR. K.JAGADEESH MR. T.S.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENTS : PETITIONERS IN WPC --------------------------------- 1. VALSA PAULOSE, AGED 62 YEARS, W/O.LATE C.K.PAULOSE, CHAKIATH HOUSE, CHERANELLOOR P.O., KOCHI - 682034. 2. PAULSON PAULOSE, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.LATE C.K.PAULOSE, CHAKIATH HOUSE, CHERANELLOOR P.O., KOCHI - 682034. 3. PETSON PAULOSE, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.LATE C.K.PAULOSE, CHAKIATH HOUSE, CHERANELLOOR P.O., KOCHI - 682034. ADV. MR. SHAJI P.CHALY MR. R.SANJITH THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: MANJULA CHELLUR, Ag. C.J. & P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Cont. Case (C) No. 589 Of 2011 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 12th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT Manjula Chellur, Ag.C.J. Heard the learned counsel for the complainant. He has come with this compliant, aggrieved by the non-implementation or violation of the directions of the Division Bench, by order dated 17.05.2011, which reads as under : “Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the additional 7th respondent. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the additional 7th respondent submitted that the petitioner is trying to fill up a puramboke thodu in the light of the interim order passed by this Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has not made any attempt to fill up the thodu and the work being executed is only in terms of the permit issued by the Panchayat. The said submission is recorded. It is clarified that the interim order already passed by this Court will not enable the petitioner to fill up the thodu that is described in the affidavit filed by the additional 7th respondent. The petitioner will take steps to implead Cheranallur Grama Panchayath. Post on 25.05.2011” 2. We note that the writ petition, which was filed by the petitioners thereunder, is withdrawn subsequent to the above interim order. Cont. Case No. 589 of 2011 :2: According to the complainant, he will not pursue the complaint for the present. In that view of the matter the proceedings are dropped. Sd/- MANJULA CHELLUR, Ag. CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd