Crl. Misc.-M. No. 32307 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc.-M. No. 32307 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:08.11.2011 Ankit Sethi and another ........Petitioners Versus Usha Rani and another ........Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. A.S. Kalra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, DAG, Punjab. RAJESH BINDAL, J. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the present petition be dismissed as not pressed qua petitioner No.1 as he has surrendered and seek regular bail. Ordered accordingly. As far as petitioner No.2 is concerned, he submitted that though her parents had appeared in the Court below after they all had been summoned by the trial Court. However, She having been married in the year 2003 and living at Panipat in her matrimonial home was not informed about the order passed by this Court. She is having two minor children to take care. Learned counsel for the complainant submitted that the petitioner No.2 has been able to delay the proceedings of the trial Court for about six years and the Court having already initiated proceedings under Section 82 Cr.P.C against her, she does not deserve Crl. Misc.-M. No. 32307 of 2011 (O&M) -2- concession of pre-arrest bail. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the Petitioner No.2 Namita had been married prior to her summoning and living at Panipat having two minor children, in my opinion, petitioner No.2 deserves concession of bail. She is directed to appear before the Court below on or before 23.11.2011 and submit her bail bonds. Petition stands disposed of. 08.11.2011 (Rajesh Bindal) harjeet Judge