IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH AUGUST 2011 / 19TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 21765 of 2011(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. HASEENA T.V., D/O.HUSSAIN, AGED 30 YEARS, HASEENA MANZIL, NEERVELI P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. MUHAMMED ASHRAF,S/O.UMMERKUTTY, AGED 30 YEARS, ASHRAF MANZIL, MATTANNUR P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.CIBI THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. HASHIM POTTAYANGADAN,SHABANA MANZIL, KOLARI AMSOM, PORORA P.O., MATTANNUR, KANNUR DISTRICT-670 001. 2. MATTANNUR MUNICPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KANNUR DISTRICT-670 001. 3. THE SECRETARY, MATTANNUR MUNICPALITY, KANNUR DISTRICT-670 001. 4. THE POLLUTION CONTOROL BOARD, KANNUR DISTRICT-670 001. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 21765 of 2011(U ----------------------------------- APPENDIX ----------------- PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ------------------------------------ EXT.P1.COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE MUNICIPALITY EXT.P2.COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PTITIONER BEFRE THE MUNICIPALITY. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD BY THE PETITIONERS ALONG WITH OTHERS. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL -------------------------------------- / TRUE CPY / P.A. TO JUDGE VK HARUN-UL-RASHID,J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 21765 OF 2011 ------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioners apprehend that if a licence is granted to run chicken stall, it may cause pollution and nuisance to the neighbouring shop owners. It is pointed out that there is every possibility that the owner of the chicken stall may not keep the stall in hygienic condition. These are all matters to be taken care of by the 2nd respondent-Municipality. The petitioners are not entitled to any relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners are at liberty to approach the 2nd respondent- Municipality to redress their grievance. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. kcv.