ssp 1 WP 6613 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6613 of 2010 Manmandir Suraksha Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. .....Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.V.A.Gangal with Mr.Vindu Pandey, for the petitioner Mr.A.I.Patel, AGP, for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.S.R.Ronghe, for respondent Nos.4(a) and 4(b). Mr.Ram Ugarh Singh, for respondent Nos.7(a) to 7(c). Mr.A.R.Pande, for the respondent No.8. CORAM: RANJIT MORE, J. DATE: 2nd MAY, 2011. P.C. : 1. The learned counsel for the parties makes a common statement that Revision under Section 257 of the Land Revenue Code, challenging the order impugned in this writ petition is maintainable. Reliance is placed on the Division Bench Judgment in Letters Patent Appeal No.55 of 2003 in Gurudassing Nawoosing Panjwani V/s.State of Maharashtra and Ors. 2. In the above circumstances, Mr.Gangal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the above petition with a liberty to file revision before the State Government. Leave and liberty as prayed for are granted. The writ petition is disposed of as such. ssp 2 WP 6613 of 2010 3. In the event of petitioner filing the revision before the State Government challenging the impugned order herein within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be disposed of by the appropriate authority as expeditiously as possible. Needless to mention that the petitioner is entitled to take benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. It is clarified that I have not gone into the merits of the matter and all the points and contentions of both the parties are expressly kept open. ( RANJIT MORE, J. )