IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 1992 OF 2008 Date of Decision: February 11, 2008 Chander Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN Present: Mr. Jai Vir Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. JUDGMENT M.M. KUMAR, J. The prayer made in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution is for de-notifying notifications dated 3.10.2006 and 1.10.2007 (Annexures P-3 and P-5), issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity, ‘the Act’) respectively, claiming that the purpose of acquisition has already been frustrated on account of development in the shape of existence of shops on the land under acquisition and the respondents have already de-notified 40% of the notified land under Section 4 of the Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset has urged C.W.P. No. 1992 of 2008 that the aforementioned notifications were subject matter of challenge in C.W.P. No. 16396 of 2007 (Jagdish and others v. State of Haryana and others), which has already been disposed of by a Division Bench vide order dated 17.12.2007 (Annexure P-7), with a direction to the respondents to consider the request of the petitioners of that case, to be made by way of a representation under Section 48 of the Act for release of the constructed portion with proportionate vacant space in terms of the policy of the State Government, within four weeks from receipt of representation. Other connected writ petitions, being C.W.P. Nos. 16804 and 18492 of 2007 were also disposed of in the same terms. Learned counsel states that the petitioner would be satisfied if the instant petition is also disposed of in terms of the order of the Division Bench, dated 17.12.2007, passed in the case of Jagdish (supra). In view of the above, the instant petition is disposed of in terms of the Division Bench order dated 17.12.2007, passed in the case of Jagdish (supra). (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (T.P.S. MANN) February 11, 2008 JUDGE Pkapoor 2