IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21248 of 2009 ARVIND ROY @ ARVIND KUMAR RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Kidnapping of son of the informant was informed to the police naming several persons as having their participation, any how the victim came back, named several persons also as their having participation but petitioner has been shown as visitor where the kidnapped boy was kept in custody. Here a question arises that there was prevailing no enmity of the nature in which kidnapped boy could be killed or could be caused any harm nor any ransom was demanded and the police has already allowed bail to the petitioner. Any finding on merit is not in prudence but once the petitioner is on bail though allowed by the police there needs no further order, only a direction is made that the petitioner is allowed to continue on bail so granted to him in connection with Ujiarpur P.S.case no. 37 of 2003 pending in the court of - 2 - Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dalsingsarai, District Samastipur. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this application for anticipatory bail is disposed of. Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI