IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 3RD OCTOBER 2011 / 11TH ASWINA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 3314 of 2011() ------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 27/09/2011, IN CRMP.2765/2011 IN SC.450/2006 of III ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, CBI-I, ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER(S)/2ND ACCUSED :- ---------------------------------------------- P.K.SUDHEER, PARAKOTTIL HOUSE, KOTTAPURAM PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.ALAN PAPALI SRI.SOJAN MICHEAL SRI.GILBERT GEORGE CORREYA RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT & ACCUSED NOS.1 AND 3 :- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, KOCHI, KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS STANDING COUNSEL HIGH COURT OF KERALA. 2. PARAKKOTTIL VIJAYAN, S/O.LATE SRI.PARAKKOTTIL KRISHNAN, PARAKKOTTIL HOUSE, KULUKILIAD, KOTTAPPURAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN 695 521. 3. SRI.GEORGE MANGALAM, S/O.SRI.FRANCIS, MANGALAM HOUSE, SREEKRISHNAPURAM P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHARA PILLAI, SC, C.B.I. FOR R1 THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: jvt Crl.M.C.No. 3314 of 2011 APPENDIX Petitioner's Exhibits :- Annexure I :- Copy of the petition dated 25.9.2011 filed by the petitioner's counsel in S.C.No.450 of 2006 before the IIIrd Additional Sessions Court, Ernakulam. Annexure II :- Copy of the relevant portion of the order dated 27.9.2011 in Crl.M.P.No.2765 of 2011 in S.C.No.450 of 2006 of the IIIrd Additional Sessions Court, Ernakulam, written down by the Counsel from the docket sheet. Annexure III :- Copy of the petition dated 27.9.2011 filed by the petitioner's counsel in S.C.No.450 of 2006 before the IIIrd Additional Sessions Court, Ernakulam. Respondent's Exhibits :- NIL. //True Copy// P.A. to Judge N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.3314 of 2011 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of October 2011 O R D E R It is submitted by both sides that CW1, the main witness who has to speak regarding the incident was not present on 26.9.2011 and so warrant has been issued against that witness. Some of the other witnesses were examined in chief. Since the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner (A2) was hospitalised, the examination of the witnesses scheduled to be had on 30.9.2011, 1.10.2011 and 3.10.2011 was ordered to be kept in abeyance. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent would submit that the witnesses now scheduled to be examined on 17.10.2011 cannot be examined on that day because the main witness could not be examined. Therefore, further scheduling of trial will be done by the learned 3rd Addl. Sessions Judge, CBI-I, Crl.M.C. No.3314 of 2011 -: 2 :- Ernakulam according to the convenience of that court. No further direction is required in this petition. Hence, this Crl.M.C. is closed. Since it is a very old case (the occurrence of 1992), the learned counsel appearing for all the accused would co- operate with the court to have a disposal of the case at the earliest. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Jvt