IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.12853 of 2010 Date of Decision : July 23, 2010. Balbir Singh and another .....Petitioners versus Union of India and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Rakesh Bhatia, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners have been served with a notice dated 17.2.2010 (Annexure P-3) under Section 13 (2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 by the respondent-bank. The petitioners are said to have submitted their objections against the said notice but without disposing of those objections, further punitive action is sought to be initiated. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners, however without expressing any views on the merits of petitioners' claim, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent C.W.P.No .12853 of 2010 2 No.2 to consider and dispose of the petitioners' objections, if any filed by them, by passing a speaking order and thereafter only to proceed further in accordance with law/Rules. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 23, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE