THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6758 of 2011 ORDER: In this writ petition, petitioner seeks a mandamus declaring the action of respondents 3 and 4 in summoning him to the police station and harassing him to compromise with the fifth respondent with regard to land covered by Survey No.99/2 admeasuring Acs.6.00 Cents situated at Kapuluppada Village, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, as illegal and arbitrary. It is the case of the petitioner that he along with J.Krishna Babu and A.Seetaram Prabhoji, purchased the land admeasuring Acs.6.00 guntas in Survey No.99/2 situated at Kapuluppada Village, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, under a registered sale deed, dated 14.09.2010. It is also his case that when there was interference by the fifth respondent with regard to aforesaid land, he approached the civil Court and obtained injunction orders. It is his grievance that though there is no crime registered against him, at the instance of the fifth respondent, respondents 3 and 4 are summoning him to the police station and insisting on him to settle the matter with the fifth respondent. Based on written instructions, dated 26.03.2011, sent by the Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police, Bhimili Police Station, Visakhapatnam District, it is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 to 4 that though there was a complaint by the fifth respondent alleging that the petitioner and others have trespassed into the land belonging to him, as there are no cognizable contents in it and as the dispute is purely civil in nature, the fifth respondent was advised to seek redressal in civil Court by giving acknowledgement to his complaint. It is also submitted that the petitioner was not called to the police station and there is no interference with the life and liberty of the petitioner. As much as even according to respondents 1 to 4, there is no crime registered against the petitioner on the complaint filed by the fifth respondent and as it is stated that there are no cognizable contents in the complaint filed by the fifth respondent and the dispute is civil in nature, the writ petition is disposed of placing on record the statement made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 to 4 that the dispute between the petitioner and the fifth respondent is civil in nature and respondents 3 and 4 are not interfering with the life and liberty of the petitioner. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 30th MARCH, 2011. kvni