1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1692 OF 2010 Kum.Madhuri Suresh Arya, Age 18 years, Occu.Student, R/o Government Ayurvedic Medical College, Nanded, at present r/o Kulswamini, Near Pardeshwar Mandir, Saraswati Nagar, Parbhani, District Parbhani .. PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra, through its Principal Secrertary, Medical Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 32 2. The Dean, Government Ayurvedic Medical College, Nanded 3. Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik, through its Vice Chancellor .. RESPONDENTS Shri M.S.Choudhari, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.V.Kurundkar, Additional Govt.Pleader for respondents 1 & 2 Shri K.C.Sant, Advocate for respondent No.3 CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND S.V.GANGAPURWALA, JJ DATE : 22nd March 2010 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER P.V.HARDAS, J.) 1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ directing respondent No.3 to declare the result of the petitioner of the B.A.M.S. first year examination held in November-December 2009. 3. Undisputedly, the caste claim of the petitioner came to be invalidated by the scrutiny committee and the petitioner being aggrieved by the order of the scrutiny committee has filed Writ Petition No.1414 of 2009. Though the petition is yet to be admitted, the Division Bench of this Court by an ad-interim order has directed that no adverse action be initiated against the petitioner on the ground of invalidation of her caste claim. Since the aforesaid order is operating and a companion petition challenging the order of the scrutiny committee invalidating the caste claim of the sister of the petitioner has been admitted by this Court, we are inclined to allow this petition and direct respondent No.3 to forthwith declare the result of the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, we allow this petition and direct the respondent No.3 to declare the result of the petitioner forthwith and to permit the petitioner to prosecute further studies, if she is found eligible, till such time as further orders are passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.1414 of 2009. 3 5. Rule is thus made absolute on the above terms with no orders as to costs. ( S.V.GANGAPURWALA ) ( P.V.HARDAS ) JUDGE JUDGE (vvr/1692.10wp)