IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 408 of 2004 Raghu Nath Lal Arya and others …Petitioners. Versus State of Uttaranchal and another …Respondents. Mr. Alok Mehra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Advocate for the respondents. Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J, (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the instant Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous as the respondents have prepared the seniority list in respect of the officers serving in Group ‘B’ posts in the Department of School Education, Uttarakhand. In view of above, the instant writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 1.4.2010 Avneet