IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 14TH OCTOBER 2010 / 22ND ASWINA 1932 RP.No. 826 of 2010 -------------------------- [THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.30731/2007 DATED 18/08/2010] .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS: ------------------------------------------------------ 1. R.C.ASOK KUMAR, PART TIME CASUAL SWEEPER, KRISHI BHAVAN, KULATHUR, UCHAKADA P.O., NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST. 2. V.THANKAMANI, PART TIME CASUAL SWEEPER, KRISHI BHAVAN, NEMAM, NEMAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A & B), KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/10/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` R.P. No. 826 of 2010 in W.P.(C) No. 30731 of 2007 H ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 14th day of October, 2010 O R D E R Prayer in the Review Petition is to delete the last sentence in the judgment. 2. By providing such safeguard in the last sentence of the judgment, all that this Court intended was that if any amount is to be deducted from the amount to be paid by virtue of the judgment, the respondents will have the freedom to do so. I do not think that the said sentence reflected any error on the face of the judgment, warranting interference in a review petition. Review Petition is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge