IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPEAL FROM ORDER (St) No. 11907 of 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER (St) No. 11907 of 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER (St) No. 11907 of 2008 WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11910 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11910 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11910 OF 2008 Ravindra Madhavrao Shinde ..Appellant. V/s. Sau. Jijabai Ramkrishna Pendhare & Ors ..Respondents. Mrs Seema Sarnaik, Advocate for the Appellant. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 15.07.2008. DATED: 15.07.2008. DATED: 15.07.2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- 1. Heard learned counsel for the Appellant. During the course of argument, I was taken through the plaint in Special Civil Suit No.399 of 2007, an application for injunction and the order passed below Exhibit 5 dated18.4.2008. Having seen that order and the reasons in support thereof no case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. The view taken by the Court below is a reasonable and possible view. The appellant-plaintiff is claiming right to subject property, based on the alleged agreement taken place in the year 1991, whereas the suit has been filed in the year 2007. The delay in filing the suit, itself, is fatal to the suit. 2. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. 3. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, civil application does not survive, same is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE