<£ ^ fip IN THE HIGH COURT OS JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR Wr.i.t Petition No m3 5ETITIOtffiR RESPONDEI'rrS vl ?^%^^.—£^^ ) r..-^^'S^ff^' F:t^^?iSS:T" p(»Sf»"--^.-..^..••••••" 1 / s ^•''M/s Annpurna Wines Pvt.Ltd. Iilnk Road, Bilaspur, througb! its Director - Balwant Singh Link Roads Bilaspur(c'garti)« Versus •" s ,;Jf» State of Chbattisgarh throughs Secretacy, Department of Excise,, D«K»Bbawan, Raipur. S^d& 2» The Excj.se Commissioner, State of Chhattisgarti» 3. Assistant Excise Cominissioner, Bilaspur D.i.vision. Bilaspur» (®^TEETXTION CTKDER ARTICUS 226/227 OT_TgE CONSTITUTIOK OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCS OFA SUITABUE S'.RIT, OKDEB OR DIRECTION. i» i:'1!!1 K ...l^ XI-HC-22 air^iqiT {?;ri?73tl^I /sn^i* "afer ^si ••<il-ii1dala . ai'g*i®;^R<?)iwi<' WAP»HOAl843/: w^i^Rnm :afttt Shri Ranvir Singh) efi|<4l^4l':S 'QW^ ^ 1^3t <[^'(^.i< ^''3TPgtl3Tlt?! 15/:IQ/2001 , Shri Rajaev shriv|astava, learned counsel for the petitinner. , learned G.A. for the State. Shri ABhishek sinjha, learned counsel appegrs and has filed I.A.No.3937/21001; application for permission to intervenue in the matterl o£ the petition be suppliedl O R petitloner states that slnci as the Intervenor. Let a copy to other side. E' R Shri Rajeev Shri-v^stava. learned aounsel for the p the representation has glready been sufanltted before the E^ccise Commissloner, Raipur - re»pondent no.2, tbe said o]£ficer be directed to examine and dispose of the represenjtation on merit. According to Shri AUiishek Sinha, learnejd osunsel for the Interveaor, the representation has alrejady been decided. Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, learned counsejl for the petitianer submits that it eould not/possibl^ in his absence. Be that as it mayl, instead of this Coxirt examining this matter, the Excise Coiatnissioner sh;3uld examine the representation (Annexure P^3) and pass hecessary orders on merit. I ..2.. [TTt^^W ^ sn^r'?;' fefesn^i gw^fffe ,giT^?T'4;lcb^<^ffj<«^T) ^ o- *'•'• Shri Abhishek Xatervenor statees that as party respondeat. In 4>H[<r!4l^ TTRcff ^f fe^ <l^'^,f< ^.aip^n-si^t • ^inha, learned counsel for a^y order to be passesd, ifihot already passed by the Cotamissioner, shall adversely affsct ttie Interest of the Intervenor. I allow the pr^yer of M/s. Amolak Slngh Bhatia to interveae in the matt|ar . The said party be impleaded vlew of this, the Excise Commission- er shall h^ar M/s» Amolajt singh Bhatia before the r^re- .•^- sentation is disposssd olf the 'Excise Commissioner Lsl; the parties appear before sn 31/10/2001. With these dir^ctions, this petition is disposed of» Certified copy as ^^--s- Sd/- ChiefJustice ^.r