IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'liTISGARH AT BIWPUR WRIT VETI’Ig‘N N0. 39 €£ OF 2005 PETITIONER g / Ram, Hosila aged Prasad, about son 41 years, 9f Sari working Jamuna as a Lab attendant, posted at Government College, Akaltara, District : Janjgir .. Champa ( C.G) 1. ’(s-tate of chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Higher Educa_ tion Department, D.K.S. Bha‘ian’ Raipur ( C.G. ) 2 The Cemmissioner, Higher Z/f/ Education, Near Scieece College, Raipur, Bistrict z Raipur ( C.G. ) 34 The Principal, Government g College, Akaltara, District : .Janjgir — Chanpa ( C,G, ) g ./ J’ WRIT FETITmbl-yygg‘xauwicms 226L2_2;7__o_§__1m CONSTITUTION OF INDIJA. / XI-HC-22 H 3a W, mg, 9 $Qgags no o... ”on“ n" .n..uu.nuu “nunuu WWW WM§WW %3I%w3n%$ d%—03—2095 Heard Shri V.K’. Pande'v, Shri Pankqj Shrivas‘mva, Panai L copy. ‘ Learned counsei ‘ for The i. pefifioner submifs Tha‘i ‘l’he pe’rifioner was working on The g [removed from service on accoun' Hefurfher submi‘rs Tho? icrrer from The crimimi case and on reinsm‘reci in service. The SL neJrifioner is .fha‘r fhougl’x The pa . service bu‘r The service behefi‘i’s Termina‘l’ion fii! reinsmfemenf ¥ Pondev submi‘rs fhaf- The represenTaTion buf They have no“ aui’horify. He Dravs Tha’r for Th‘ disposed of wifh a direc‘iion ‘l‘o represenfm‘ion before the < counsel for The De‘i’ifioner and awver for The 5mm on advance )osf of Lab Affend'anf and was V r of conviction in a criminal case. )n The peTiTioner was acquiTTed The basis of acquiTTal he was bmiSsion of iearned forj’rhe :TiTioner has been reins‘l’aTed in “ of‘The period from The daTe of - as noT been mid To him. 5hr‘i oeTiTioner has filed many been decided by The concerned z Time being The peTiTion may be The peTiTioner To fiie a defaiied oncerhed auThoriTy and The (di%é%i) XI-HC-22 3am;mw§,mgt mm '«1 zoo nou-ouonuuunnn“... .-.._.. &,—r / V>1~.9.;..'.$f'.€a%l0§ WM§MW - §YWW dispose; of The renresenTaTion ' peTenT auThoriTy shaii dispose of The some as ear-iv as nossibie pirefembiv wiThin a period of Three mon‘r'hs from The dafe of re¢ eiDT of The said represenTaTion and also wiTh a cony of This wriT" 'aIonqwiTh a copy-of #his order peTiTion. WiTh The aforesaid o aservaTions and direcTions The peTiTion sTancis finaiiv disposed ConsequenTiv, l.A.No.657 CerTified copy as Derruk. . Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge GéWri " concerned .au‘rhori‘ry may f To This iimi‘i’ed prayer“; ‘ pefi?ioner! ieamed couhsei for“ Consequenfw The prayer 11' is hereby d'ir'ed'e'd ‘t nmfion before The compeTenT may file o detailed repres ouThor'iTy wiThin aperiod of i days from Today and if such o represenfafion is fiied, The co wi'rhin The sfioula’red period granfed by 'i’his Court made bv ieamed counsei for The ’rhe S‘mTe, has no ob iecfion. Es aliowed. haT if so advised The neTiTioner of aT This sTaoe. 2f05 aiso sTand's disbosed of. ’s Vi Sd/— (thdW)