IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 7TH JUNE 2010 / 17TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 11762 of 2010(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- JINACHANDRAN.A., 'NADADMIKA', MELOOR P.O., THALASSERRY, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.PREMCHAND RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THALASSERY. 3. DHARMADOM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DHARMADOM P.O., THALASSERRY. ADV. SRI.P.V.SURENDRANATH FOR R3 SRI.B.S.SYAMANTHAK FOR R3 SMT.BINDUMOL JOSEPH FOR R3 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K. RAMESH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 11762 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 7th day of June, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by the 3rd respondent-Panchayat reclaiming properties allegedly in violation of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008. They have already submitted Exts.P1 and P2 complaints in this regard before respondents 1 and 2. In the above circumstances, I deem it appropriate to direct the competent as between respondents 1 and 2 to consider Exts.P1 and P2 and pass final orders in the matter as provided under law expeditiously. This shall be done by the competent as between respondents 1 and 2 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and the 3rd respondent. The interim order passed by this Court would continue to be in force till then. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.