IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH JANUARY 2010 / 16TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 36422 of 2009(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SALIM, S/O.K.K.ALI, ERUMAKATTU HOUSE, EDAYAPPURAM, THOTTAKKATTUKARA, ALUVA. 2. NASIM SALIM, W/O.SALIM, ERUMAKATTU HOUSE, EDAYAPPURAM, THOTTAKKATTUKARA, ALUVA. BY ADV. SRI.DINESH MATHEW J.MURICKEN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. PIN-695 033. 2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALUVA PIN 683 101. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALUVA. PIN 683101. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALUVA, PIN 683101. 5. SHAJAHAN, VATHIYATH, ALUVA, PIN 683 101. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.R.LAKSHMI NARAYAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.36422 of 2009 ------------------------------- Dated this the 6th January, 2010 J U D G M E N T Raman, J. The allegation raised in this writ petition is that the third respondent is interfering in a civil dispute between the petitioners and the fifth respondent, regarding some financial transactions in respect of a vehicle. An interim direction was issued by this Court on 23.12.2009, to the effect that, in case the presence of the petitioners are required for any enquiry or investigation, they shall be issued with a notice in writing. The Government Pleader was also directed to get instructions. 2. Today, when the matter came up for further consideration, the learned Government Pleader, Sri.R. Lakshmi Narayan, appearing on behalf of the official respondents submitted that when a complaint was received from the party respondent, both sides were called, party respondent was advised W.P.(C) No.36422/2009 2 to approach the Civil Court, and they have not done anything further. 3. Since we are not entering any finding regarding the nature of the dispute and we are not issuing any order against the interest of the party respondent, it is not necessary to issue notice to the party respondent, at this stage. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the interim direction is made absolute. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE nj.