IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11424/2008 Decided on:23.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Tarsem Lal. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and another. .…Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. R.R. Rahi, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ansul Bansal, Addl. A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he has not been considered for promotion for the post of Principal. Precise case of the respondent-State is that since he has not passed the departmental examination, he could not be considered for promotion. 2. Mr. R.R. Rahi has drawn the attention of the Court to Annexure A-7 dated 18.4.2000. Para 4 of the same reads thus: 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 “That the condition of passing the Departmental Examination shall be applicable only after the conferment of gazetted status to the incumbents.” 3. Consequently, in view of condition No.4 of Annexure A-7 dated 18.4.2000; respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Principal, within a period of two months, after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. 4. In view of above direction, the petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 23.12.2010 *awasthi*