1 WP 1604.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1604 OF 2011 Ritesh S/o Rajendra Shroff and another .... PETITIONERS VERSUS The Hindustan Petroleum Corporation and others. .... RESPONDENTS Mr. A.V.Patil Indrale, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.R.Shaikh, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for State. Smt. Anjali Bajpai Dube, Advocate for Resp.Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Alok Sharma, Standing Counsel for Resp. No. 3. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE : 04/03/2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The grievance of the petitioner, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, is that initially the petitioners were called for interview, wherein the petitioners were selected as first empanelled 2 WP 1604.2011 candidate. Thereafter, complaint regarding site evaluation was made by second empanelled candidate and after investigation it was found that there is change in empanelment. The competent authority then decided to cancel the entire proceeding of the interview including cancellation of empanelment and fresh interviews were conducted. One of the petitioners was not permitted to appear for interview on the ground that he does not possess H.S.C. pass mark list. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner Machindra Namdeo Patil was possessing S.Y. B.Sc. pass certificate, still the authorities of the respondent – Corporation did not permit the petitioner to appear for interview. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner petitioner submits that now the stand of the Corporation is that the petitioners remained absent for the interview. Appropriate complaint is filed by the petitioners with Grievance cell, which is under consideration. 4. The learned counsel for the Corporation submits that as long as complaint is pending with the Grievance Committee, further steps in respect of LOI will be taken not by the Corporation. The learned counsel submits that the complaint of the petitioner is still pending with the grievance Cell, would be decided on its merits. 3 WP 1604.2011 5. In the light of the statement made, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] knp/WP 1604.2011