IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3605 OF 2010 Jayendra Chandulal Thakkar ...Applicant V/S. The Union of India & anr. ...Respondents Mr. Niranjan Mundargi, advocate for the applicant. Mrs. V.R. Bhosale, APP for the State. CORAM :- Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J. 9th August, 2011. P.C. :- 1. This application challenges the order dated 22nd June, 2010 passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 3rd Court, Esplanade, in C.C. No. 15/CW/2006 on the application filed by the applicant requesting that he be allowed to conduct a demonstration to show that it is not possible to conceal currency notes of US$ 600 in the shoes. 2. While rejecting the application, the learned Magistrate has observed as follows :- “On the basis of the evidence it would be appreciated whether it is possible to export this much of amount in the shoes worn by the accused. The court does not require any demonstration on this point to reconstruct the incident. In view of this observation I do not require the need to direct the complainant to arrange for equivalent currency notes for the demonstration.” 3. Mr. Mundargi, the learned counsel for the applicant, submits that, the demonstration is desired by the applicant in view of the evidence of the officer that it is possible to put currency notes of US$ 600 in the shoes worn by the applicant at the relevant time and to wear the shoes. I find no infirmity with the impugned order because even with the evidence of the officer, it is perfectly possible to argue that the evidence of the officer cannot be believed and that such a situation is an impossible situation. Hence, the Criminal Application is dismissed. [SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J]