MMJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.44 OF 2010 Nitin Harishchandra Patil ..Petitioner vs. The High Power Committee & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. D.D. Madon, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. Sanjiv Sawant for the Petitioner Mr. Milind More AGP for Respondent Nos.2 & 3 Mr.G.D. Utangale i/b Utangale & Co. for Respondent No.4 Mr. S.U.Kamdar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Pooja Patil and Mr. Rakesh Misar i/b S.Mohammedbhai & Co. for Respondents No.5 & 6 CORAM : J. N. PATEL & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATE : 13th APRIL, 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has approached this Court with a grievance that the High Power Committee has vacated the interim order after receipt of the report dated 18-12-2009 from Additional Collector (Enc/Removal), having observed that no irregularities are seen in the Annexure-II, we are vacating the stay granted by the Committee on 16-10-2009. This was after the receipt of the report dated 18-12-2009 of the Additional Collector (Enc/Removal). The order impugned itself records that as regards other allegations in the complaint, the advocate for the appellant prays time to submit documentary evidence before the Committee on the next date of hearing and the appeal came to be adjourned. 3. The basis on which the petitioner has moved the High Power Committee is that the respondents have played a fraud on all concerned and that respondent No.5 society has failed to submit the accurate list of the eligible occupants and were committing various illegalities and irregularities in the affairs of the society. 4. In view of the fact that, the High Power Committee is seized of the matter, it will not be proper for this Court to intervene in the process of verification, which is being conducted by the High Power Committee in its writ jurisdiction. The Petitioner is at liberty to tender tangible evidence before the High Power Committee in support of his complaint/grievance as regarding bogus members and so on. The parties are at liberty to move the High Power Committee to expeditiously dispose of the complaint before them. 5. We are, therefore, not inclined to entertain this petition. The petition is dismissed. ( J. N. PATEL, J.) ( A.P. BHANGALE, J.)