N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDI TURE AT BI f..¢o APPELLANTS : NONAPPLICANT 310.2 Smgle Bench 1’ Péwan Kuma Agrawal S/o L R Agrawal R/o 159 Nagar Nlgam Colony Ralpur ah Dustt R|alpur , T & ERS asan umar, S/o Srl Halalkhor Dhruv, ” ed about 3Q Yrs Lt B W/ 3 B L M I ‘ ’ MAN. ' ’ - I ‘ I PLICAN aa al o Basant Kumar, aged I ' about 0 Yrs! oth R/o Bhawam Nagar Jarera abhandl Ralpur (CIG ) I ahaveer Slngh S/o Dayal Sungh Thakur, Ro Gogaon, I? S Urala(Ralpur), Dlstt / alpurC G R( ) ESPNT N*PNIO. 1 / isceaneous Apeal uner ection 173 of the Moto ehlcle Act 1994 VUS 9“ g/ RESPONDENTS: ~ PTS Bt K Ag I RONDESI' NOAPLICATI Mll g d S V 3am, m,m m (cpx) ‘23/QOOE nun u... . i 200 .. ............. .unuuuuu..mnn ‘ . WWW r RP?ELLAKT Non-applicant No. 2 KESPONBEii’T‘S 1 . Applican ts N)‘ RE3PGWDENT§ I 3. Nan-apylicant No; 1 Pawan Kuinar Agrawai Raipur Tan m uistt Ralpur z‘v’ersus Ba$ant humar b/o Sn Halaiknor Uhruv agF'd about 3’) yparc Lati Ban, Wjo. Basant Kulnal~, aged about 30 mars. Both Rjo. ‘ Ma] lavear Nagar Jarera, Dayai Smgn . Umia (Raipur) SB: HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE] 36-2007 Shn' SC. Velma, Advocate Heard on M(C.)P. No. 153 V2006, app1ication for conciOnation of dsiay in been preferred with a. deiay of 3‘1 days as per The reason assigned for dei iayman and he was not having the ‘ The reason assigned in the pplication for delay in fih'nc the appeal is not suffiment bven other Wise nom p insal ol the impugied awald, 1t is observed has een awatded to the parents of the deceased namely Jiasant Kumar and Lata Bai by assessing notional income of the deceased fding the appeal as this appcai has offlce note dated 30-6-2006. that a sum of Rs 1 34 3UOI— S/o LR AgmwaL P/o 159 “lava! Ninam Celnnv Bhawam' Labhandi, Raipur {C f‘ ) Thaku R/o Gogaon Disn: Ralpur (C )WEIVYIM NHSHEA, J for tho appeiiant. bmgh S/ o in fiiing the appeai is that the appeliant is a owiedge of period for filing the appeal. i i !:_ I XI-HC-22 EW,WW mm r m m. .W€?h¢.b~.f13/5L wt m ”nun ”nun nu nnunnuuu PP 3)\ la W .‘