1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.3870/2010 Gautam Seth & Anr. Vs. State Date of order : 21/5/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma for the petitioners. Shri Amit Punia, P.P. for the State. ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners were arrested on 29.3.2010 in FIR No.73/2010 of Police Station Murlipura, Jaipur. Their arrest was shown on 30.3.2010 in FIR No.46/2010 of Police Station Lal Kothi, Jaipur. Except these two cases, there is no other case pending against the petitioners. In both the cases, recovery of the stolen articles have already been made at the instance of the petitioners. There is no other case pending against the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners would undertake not to indulge in any offence in future. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and 2 circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioners on bail. In the result, this bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Gautam Seth S/o Ram Bachan Seth & (2) Amar Goswami @ Manoj S/o Kishan Goswami shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No.46/2010, P.S. Lal Kothi, Jaipur, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for their appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. It is made clear that the release of the petitioners should be made only after the sureties produced by them are verified by the Tehsildar of the area, where they are residing. However, in case the petitioners are found indulged in similar offence at any point of time, the prosecution would be at liberty to apply for cancellation of their bail before the Court of Sessions itself and the bail would be liable to be cancelled on this ground alone. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/