IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48781 of 2008 SHAMBHU CHAUDHARY, son of Raja Ram Chaudhary, resident of Village Nawaner, Police Station Obra, District Aurangabad --------Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30.1.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner, who is the husband of the deceased, has been made accused for the offences under sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. As a matter of fact, the daughter of the informant died on account of the illness. Besides the above, it is submitted that the trial of other co-accused, namely, father-in-law and Dewar was separated. It is submitted that Sessions Trial no.63/08 is in respect of the father-in-law and the Dewar. The father of the deceased was the informant and he has not supported the allegations. The learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the trial of the case is going on and as such, the petitioner is not entitled to be enlarged on bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner Shambhu Chaudhary be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge (F.T.C. No.I), Aurangabad, in connection with Sessions Trial No.79/08/85/08, arising out of Obra P.S. Case No.05 of 2007. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)