IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1529 of 2010 1. M/S MITHILA ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR, GOLA ROAD, SAMASTIPUR, 2. TILAK RAJ S/O SRI BALDEO LAL R/O STATION ROAD, SAMASTIPUR, P.S TOWN, DISTT- SAMASTIPUR, PROPRIETOR OF M/S MITHILS ENTERPRISES, GOLA ROAD, SAMASTIPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR GENRAL CUM INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE I.G. POICE, DARBHANGA RANGE, DARBHANGA 4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SAMASTIPUR ----------- For the petitioners:- Mr. Mukesh Kr. Thakur, Adv. For the State:- Mr. A. Amanullah, Adv. Mr. A. Rahman, Adv. ---------------- 2. 08.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The claim in the writ petition is for payment of pending bills in respect of certain supplies effected by the petitioners to the Static Police Force during the State Assembly Elections held in 2005. A counter affidavit has been filed by the SDPO, Sadar, Samastipur. It acknowledges liability for Rs. 2,85,390. It further states that the payment shall be made from the financial allocation for the year 2011-12. Counsel for the petitioners submits that dues are more. The writ Court has its limitation in 2 disputes of the present nature. It cannot consider matters beyond the admitted amount. If the petitioner has any grievances with regard to any further claims he has to avail his remedies in accordance with law. The admitted amount is directed to be paid to the petitioners within a maximum period of three months failing which after expiry of three months, the dues shall carry interest at the Bank rate from the date that they became due till payment. It is considered necessary in view of the fact that the respondents appeared to have woken up only after the institution of the writ application for a claim as far back as 2005. The writ application stands disposed in the aforesaid terms. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)