IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER FRIDAY, THE 29TH AUGUST 2008 / 7TH BHADRA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1086 of 2008(S) ------------------------------------------------------ ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.25183/2005DATED 31.8.2006 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER:- -------------------------------------- ANANDAN P.K., PERUMPALLI CHIRAYIL HOUSE, PALLIPPURATHUSSERY P.O., VAIKOM. BY ADV. SRI.MOHAN IDICULLA ABRAHAM SRI.MARTIN D.ALUMKARA SRI.RACHEL P.MATHEW SMT.PUSHPY B.MURICKEN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 3 & 4: ------------------------------------------------------- 1. DR.RIJI G. NAIR, AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE CONSUMERN FEDERATION LTD., GANDHI NAGAR, KOCHI 682 020. 2. V.KARUNAN MASTER, AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PTITIONER, PRESIDENT, KERALA STATE CONSUMER FEDERATION LTD., GANDHI NAGAR, COCHIN 682 020. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.M.SASINDRAN THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & A.K.BASHEER, J. ------------------------------------------- Cont. Case (C) No.1086 of 2008 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 29th day of August, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. Inter alia, alleging that the respondents have disobeyed wilfully and deliberately, the orders and directions issued by this Court in W.P.(C) No.25183 of 2005 and connected cases dated 31st August, 2006, the petitioner in the writ petition has presented this contempt petition. (2) The respondents have entered appearance through their learned counsel. (3) Sri.M.Sasindran, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, would inform us that the respondents being aggrieved by the orders passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No.25183 of 2005 and connected cases, have preferred a Special Leave Petition before the Apex Court in No.3525 of 2007. (4) Since the orders passed by the Division Bench of this Court is the subject matter of the Special Leave Petition, in our opinion, it may not be appropriate for us to initiate any contempt proceedings against the respondents. Cont. Case (C)No.1086 of 2008 2 (5) Accordingly, for the present, we close this contempt petition. However, we reserve liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court if need arises in future. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (A.K.BASHEER) JUDGE vns