1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No.475/2009 (Bhim Singh Versus The State of Rajasthan) Date of Order :: 20th January, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GUMAN SINGH By post. Mr. B.K. Sharma, Deputy Government Counsel for the State of Rajasthan The convict-petitioner has preferred this writ petition for grant of third parole of 40 days. He has also mentioned that he does not want to file any application for parole before the District Magistrate for the reason that they do not grant parole. 2. It is relevant to mention that there are statutory rules for grant of parole, according to which the Parole Committee has been constituted to consider the case for grant of parole. Unless an application, either oral or in writing, is filed and the same is rejected for any reason whatsoever, we are not inclined to entertain the application for parole directly. In these circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain this parole application at this stage and the same is, 2 accordingly, dismissed, with liberty to convict-petitioner to move an appropriate application before the appropriate Parole Committee and in case the same is filed, the Parole Committee is directed to decide the same at the earliest as per Rules. 3. A copy of this order may be sent for information to convict-petitioner. (GUMAN SINGH), J. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK