IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH JANUARY 2007 / 27TH PAUSHA 1928 R.C. Rev..No. 449 of 2006() ------------------------ RCA.58/1999 of II ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, TRIVANDRUM RCP.2/1998 of RENT CONTROL COURT, TRIVANDRUM .................... REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/COUNTER PETITIONER ------------------------------------------------------------------ THE ARTS ACADAMIC SOCIETY, ROOM NO.10, THE KERALA HINDU MISSION, POTTAKUZHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, C.S.SUKUMARAN, KALA BHAVAN, ARPUKKARA EAST, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY SRI.M.R.RAJESH SMT.A.K.PREETHA BINDIYA JOSE RESPONDENTS: APPELLANT/PETITIONER --------------------------------------------- THE KERALA HINDU MISSION, POTTAKUZHY, BEHIND SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY. BY / THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THEFOLLOWING: K.A. ABDUL GAFOOR & K.R. UDAYABHANU, JJ ================================ R.C.R. NO. 449 OF 2006 ================================ Dated this the 17th day of January 2007 ORDER Udayabhanu, J The Revision Petitioner is the tenant who is disputing the rate of rent. The landlord had claimed at the rate of Rs. 200/-. The courts below have concurrently found that the rent as claimed is the sum agreed to between parties. It was also noticed that the building is situated in Trivandrum in the heart of city. We find absolutely no grounds to admit the Revision Petition. The Revision Petition is dismissed accordingly. K.A. ABDUL GAFOOR, JUDGE K.R. UDAYABHANU, JUDGE. RV