w 17¢ -1- ® §§rlg§$ aanGh * In the Honble High Court of Chhattisgarh atBilaspure (C.G.) w. P. (S) No .........91.81%;........... 2009 /. Petitioner ............. LN. Hirwani aged 59 1/2 years Son of late Shri S.L. Hirwani, Sub Divisional Officer, P.W.D. Sb Division No.1, Balod Tahsil Balod Distt. Durg (C.G.) Versus 1. State Govt of Chhattishgarh, Throughvthe Secretary, Pblic Works Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur 2. {Superintendent Engineer, P.W.D., G.E. Road, near Rest House, Durg (C.G.) Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of Mandamus/Direction or anv other appropriate writ. ‘A?L§)L\bé&%1\ r/‘ai 2009 31mm (Wu) WWWJ mmvfgam WWW WW r %'simané§r S.B: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. F‘RlTlNKER DIWAKER 28—08-2009: ‘ Mr. Somkant Verma cour sel for the petitioner. Ms.Sunita Jain, Pah’el Lav‘lyer for the State. Counsel far the petitionei’ submits that against the impugned trariEfer order of the petitioner d ated 27.6.2009 passed by respondent No.1! petitioner has already .(Annexure P-3) and purpose f the present writ petition wouid be served if a direction is issued to respondent No. 1 to decide the pending representation as mad by the petitioner. He further submits that he is making this request ecause the petitioner is due to retire on 31 ‘1 .2010. To this prayer of he counsel for the petitioner. oounse! for‘the State has no objection. The limited request ma e by the petitioner appears to be reasonable. Accordingly, the writ peti ion is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority that th representation of the petitioner which is already pending before the espondent No. 1 should be decided within a period of three weeksf m the date of receipt of this order.’ ade a representation on 29.7.2609 f Certified copy asper rule . Sdl— Pritinker Diwakel‘ Judge