® IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUD!CATURE_CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.No. s>/7 / 2006 Aooeiiant Defendant No. 1 Versus 'Sanjay Agrawal Aged about 39 years S/o Shri R.S.AgrawaI, Partner M/s Agrawal Consultant and Engineers, 2/5 Nehm Nagar, Bhilai, Dist : Durg-iC.G.S Respondent No, 1 Plaintiff tesoonden.t No.2 Defendant No.2 ^ M/s Nawkar Construction Partncrship Firm, fhrough - Partaer Inderchand Dhariyal, R/o 45/4, Sadar Bazar, Raipur-jC.Q.) Akik Kuinar, Proprietor Alok Kiraya Bhandar, Shop No.26, Nawkar Bhawan, Choubey CoSony, Swami Atmanajid Ward, Raipur-(C.G.) ^ APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OP THE APPEAL.NO.99/200G DISMISSED IN DEFAULTON 12.06.2006. XI-HC-78 3n^T^rR-(i+ (PIT 311^1 sbfi* 3^'snqTcpT, ®Tl1wi6,islctiyy >^ < i-.C- N'.' ^Wv[t sh^lih ^><s? %. W^ 200^ 3ll^<l ISKB ('iq^i!|^isT) ^dRITHfersil^T 20.6.2006 Shri. Kishore Bhaduri, None for respondents. Leamed coiuisel foi 12.6.2006, the appeal has appeUaat. He further were abseut, thereforc, this respondents and can be heard and decided. Considered. Prayer Heard. Taking mto accoim) appUcation duty supported fact that fhere is sufficient appellant on 12.6.2006 w^ hearmg. Application is allowed.| First Appeal No. A copy ofthe order be kept i^ Accordingly, M.C.C. N^ 99/2p06 qilllCT'fll lllcil fftel^l'<Rl+<il< ^anf^Haii^r ;ounsel for applicaut. the applicant submits that on ^een dismissed for non-appearaace of subn^its that on fhat day, both the parties tnatter can be heard wifhout notice to d^cided. He prays that the matter be al]owed. fhe grounds mentioned in the ttifh an. affidavit, I am satisfied with fhe (t ground for nou-appearance of the icn the appeal was catled out for Itl is restored to its original number. the records offhe First Appeal. . 319/2006 stands disposg^ of. ^, Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge