1 1211cao1455.13 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C. A. O. NO. 1455 OF 2013 IN M. C. A ST. NO. 12654 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1309 OF 2007 Lrishnarao Ramrao Khandwe VERSUS State of Maharashtra thr Secretary Edu. Deptt. & Ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S. R. Deshpande counsel for the applicant. Shri Kothari AGP for the respondent/State. CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI AND A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 12 , 2013 . The applicant seeks condonation of delay of 2114 days in filing the application for review. The original petitioner seeks review of the judgment dated 3rd September 2007 whereby the Writ Petition preferred by the petitioner was partly allowed. We have heard the learned counsel for the applicant on the application for condonation of delay as well as on the review application. According to the learned counsel for the applicant there are no reasons given in the impugned judgment as to why the petitioner's contention regarding entitlement to computation of service was not accepted. We find that in para 3 of the aforesaid judgment the Division Bench has clearly recorded that on collective reading of Rules 21(2), 153, 156, 157 and 158 of the 2 1211cao1455.13 Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules the petitioner's contention cannot be accepted. In view of the aforesaid finding duly recorded, no case is made out for review of the aforesaid judgment. Similarly we find that there is an inordinate delay of 2114 days in filing the aforesaid review application which is not satisfactorily explained. The application for condonation of delay therefore stands rejected and the application seeking review stands disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE svk