IN THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W^P. No. ^-5 I ] pf2004 PETITIONER &gs a?s^^^?9+* $ .v/--^ -^.-••:'^^" >••'' ^.l^tA ••'''" ..*^^ y'.,«&w'\..f-y' ^••^ ..A'5^'' ^ RESPONDBNTS 1) 2) 3) Smt. Geeta Nayak, D/o. Shri Kashi Fayak, aged about 30 years, Occupation - .S-taff Nurse, SaAudayik Swastha Kendra Gharghodia, District - Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, Health & Family Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur Director, Health Services, District - Raipur (C.G.) Chief Medical and Health Officer Raigarh (C.G.) q\\\w WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTLCLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA tllS gi^isNW il^i 1 n' »LI.]I 3'e['--i<i^i<'i4;^'8'nl'y<fe,,fi«i[M<i< -:M.tS.^.rU..{-S^a0^..., Wtwgfer sti^i *(^I^!=OTT ^TPT^ ^r f^t ^R^T< ' ^'siSwaii^, .'•" 24.1.2005 Smt. 1-fdnfticia Sicldique^jsounsei for thei'petitipner. Shpi Somdesp !5ufc^;F^el Lawyerforthe Stcite. l-leard.;^.':^ ' ; - ;':rl'.~' - ' -.-' • .. .^.':. . :.: .' •, 1 By this wrif patitio^ ftled ^und^^^ Constitution o|FrIndia, 1tiiepe|-itiorieFhascha!lengedtheimpugned1o^ dated 8.1X3.2QQ4CArinexure P|-l.) passed Ay -rfie C|hief Wieidical & 1-teall-h Officer, Rajgarh/ rfes|Mnden|' No.3 whereby thfe petitioner ihae bieen tr'ansferredfrontShargSiodaJtoVijaynagdu'. ^e aise of^tKe peti*i|?nep is tiiat she te at CommuhilY ^eallh &ntt^^arghpdasirice 1995. Vide AnHeXuFeiP-1, she has beeri ^•tTat'isferr'edfj'^nt.Somnnunity Health iCeritre, (^iinr'g^oda •t'o VijcyncgaF(bharsjagBrh)whic^is&dmit1'edlyaaiinter-disti''icttJ'oasfei*. l^med^wuCTselfor t((g:petiti6ner submits thcrfr theip^ having thsf®?p°"sjt>yi'tyof;flerolclmother(mclshe Is no-l- in aiposiH-iQn -to ieave herpre^ntpldceof p^ting. Shealso submits th<^athefcpre place of posfjng thare'is 0^0rtage oif stffff membe^ transfer:of.thepetifionerst|ou!clbe;quashed.. • ^'-;': ^ j^ .':. ^&uring;; the| coup^J|)S.,argumen*s,; learhed^^ .petitiorrer sufcmits that^'s!'ie{|sKQutd:beiallpwsd^^^^t^ :^:'j: !.:l MWi ;l'-ij.-i'iri sWW .1:: p l.-l1!'-!:: •^:f J stfifilNiiSt'lliM'sffilK'^Bhrisri'AyUhSd'SBSB^S^BBBiBSB ^:^:tll 'i'li! ^^"•^ ~^f'' yU-tl^.-—/S •3TI^T:^I K;-li<* i ;i8iiai^!3i3iN; •lll viit- f^i. •m •ww 'sj^^i^*i,j»Ttl•tfis, RiBiwp tllJBII :i:i^!'l;l •sn^i TTOT (''^l^'^)' TCiiWaf^tai^ -•2-- before 1+ie respondenTS No her case sy'mpd'ftietically. Th:is litnil-ed pr'ayer (^ ppposed by the •State cpuns^l. Thfeprayer is allowed^ It; is directed that before the respondents No <!M';<E<i4ti tff^^H ^f fe^ <^^'< ^sjfgq 311^1 2 and 3 and they may be directed jw elest^le^ f learned counsel for the petititjner" srsiol'l }"1 the same with ino periocl of the petitioner may make a pepresenltition 2 dnd 3, raisihg all her grievances rtithin a period of 15 days from ta^qy alohg with the cppy of this order|<uid if such a represeritation is mtide, the authorities concerned shall deci<!e ^neimonthfsornttiedateofifs'fiiing. With th®ffforesmd c^ir«c1;ion, the petitioh standsfindlly disp^ of. Certifiedcopydsperniles. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge 1