1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1089 OF 1997 Bhagwan S/o Rajabhau Chate Age : 27 Yrs., Occ. Teacher, R/o : At Post : Tembawa, Tq. Kaij, Dist. Beed. .... PETITIONER VERSUS 1. Pragati Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Beed Through its Secretary Sow. Satyabhamabai Ramkishna Bangar Age : Major, R/o : At Post , Tq. Patoda, Dist. Beed. 2. Head Master Bhagwan Maharaj High School Savargaon (Ghat), Tq. Patoda, Dist. Beed. 3. Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Beed. 4. Dy. Director of Education Aurangabad Region, Aurangabad. 5. Navnirman Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Bhayala, through Secretary Ramkrishna Maruti Bangar Age : Major, R/o : At Post , Tq. Patoda, Dist. Beed. 6. Head Master Adarsha Vidyalaya, Khalapuri Tq. Patoda, Dist. Beed. 2 7. Govt. of Maharashtra Through its Govt. Pleader Bench at Aurangabad. 8. Director of Education Pune Region, Pune. .... RESPONDENTS Mr. R.J.Godbole, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. N.B.Patil, Assistant Govt. Pleader for State. Mr. R.T.Nagargoje, Advocate for respondent nos. 5 & 6. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1807 OF 1997 Uttam S/o Sahebrao Nagargoje Age : 37 Yrs., Occ. Service, R/o : At Yewalwadi, Tq. & Post : Patoda, Dist. Beed. .... PETITIONER VERSUS 1. Janta Vidyalaya Kakad Hira, Tq. Patoda, Dist. Beed, through Head Master. 2. Dy. Director of Education Aurangabad Region, Aurangabad. 3. Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Beed. 4. Pragati Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Patoda, Dist. Beed Through its Secretary. .... RESPONDENTS 3 Mr. R.J.Godbole, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. N.B.Patil, Assistant Govt. Pleader for State. CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND S.V.GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE : 15/06/2010 ORAL JUDGMENT : [ PER - B.R.GAVAI, J. ] 1. These petitions have been filed by the petitioners for direction to the respondents to pay salary to them in the prescribed scale of Assistant Teacher. The petitioner have also prayed that respondent no. 1 be directed to pay to the petitioners an amount of Rs. 50,000/- which was taken by the respondent no. 1 at the time of appointment of petitioners as Assistant Teacher. 2. Mr. R.T. Nagargoje, the learned counsel for respondent nos. 5 and 6 submits that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, wherein it has been agreed that 80 % amount be deposited in this Court along with interest accrued thereon should be permitted to be withdrawn by the petitioner. Mr. Nagargoje submits that he has communication addressed to him by respondent no. 1. 3. Mr. Godbole, the learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute about the settlement of the matter. He further submits that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the entire amount deposited by the management along with interest accrued thereon. 4 4. Mr. Nagargoje, the learned counsel for respondent nos. 5 and 6 does not seriously dispute the contention of Mr. Godbole. 5. In that view of the matter, the present Writ Petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioners to withdraw the amount deposited in this Court by respondent no. 1 along with interest accrued thereon. Rule is discharged in above terms. 6. In the view of disposal of Writ Petition, Civil Applications does not survive and accordingly disposed of. [ S.V.GANGAPURWALA ] [ B.R.GAVAI ] JUDGE JUDGE knp/WP 1089,1807.97