IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 3786 of 1996 Between: 1 P.Indra Reddy, M.L.A., S/o. Krishna Reddy. R/o. Hyderabad. (Former Home Minister, Govt. of A.P.). 2 Deveneni Rajasekhar @ Nehru, M.L.A., Kankipadu Constituency, Former Minister, Govt. of A.P., Hyderabad. 3 Byreddy Rajasekhara Reddy, M.L.A., Nandikotkur, Kurnool Dt. Resident of Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of A.P., Rep. by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Sri N. Chandra Babu Naidu, Chief Minister, Govt. of A.P., Hyderabad. 3 Sri V.Apparao, Commissioner of Police, City, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring that the respondents 2 & 3 have violated the Constitution by abusing the State power vested in 1st respondent and as such are accountable to the Constitutional Court as per the Full Bench judgment reported in A.I.R. 1988 A.P. at page 144. Counsel for Petitioners: MR. L.RAVICHANDAR Counsel for Respondents 1 & 3: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for Respondent No.2: Mrs. P.Sundari Prasad The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri L.Ravichandar, learned Counsel for petitioners, submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Placing the said submission on record, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J Dated: 10th December, 2004. Asp/Ak ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Chief Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. Two CCs to the Advocate General, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (O.U.T). 3. Two CD copies.