: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1116 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1116 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1116 OF 2007 Bharat Vikas Utility Services Ltd. ..Applicant. V/s. Mrs.Priya Gopinadhan & Anr. ..Respondents. Shri Sharad Suryavanshi h/for M.G.Wakshe advs. for the applicant. Ms.S.V.Gajare, APP for the Respondent/State. WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1117 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1117 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1117 OF 2007 Dharmendra K. Ramchandra & Anr. ...Applicants. V/s. Hanumant Ramdas Gaikwad & Ors. ...Respondents. Smt. Smita Gadhiani, adv. for the Applicants. Smt.M.H.Mhatre, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 2nd April, 2007. DATE : 2nd April, 2007. DATE : 2nd April, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Parties. 2. Both these applications are filed to quash counter criminal cases filed against each other. Parties have informed that there has been amicable settlement between them and they want that proceedings be quashed. Parties have filed ’Consent Terms’ marked ’X’ in Criminal Application No.1116 of 2007. Parties and their counsel are present. They admit the contents. Therefore, in terms of the said ’Consent Terms’, both these applications are allowed in terms of the prayer clause (b) therein. : 2 : (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.)