IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1759 of 2008 SMT.KANAK LATA AMBASTHA, W/O- LATE BHRIGHU NANDAN MANDILWAR, RESIDENT OF MF-3, FLAT NO. 3 BLOCK NO. 6 BAHADURPUR HOUSING COLONY, BHUTNATH ROAD, KANKARBAGH, P.S. AGAMKUAN, DISTRICT PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY CUM COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, BIHAR PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (CID), BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL (CID) BIHAR, PATNA. 6. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL BIHAR, PATNA. ----------- 02. 05.11.2009 I.A. No. 3458 of 2009 has been filed for substituting the legal representatives of the original petitioner namely, Smt. Kanak Lata Ambastha, who died during the pendency of this writ application on 16th of February 2009. Let a copy of the interlocutory application has been served to the other side. Having no objection, let the name of the legal representatives, as mentioned in paragraph -5 of the interlocutory application, be substituted in place of original writ petitioner, namely, Smt. Kanak Lata Ambastha and her name be expunged from the record. Accordingly, the interlocutory application is disposed of. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State and the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon the death of their father in harness while working in the office of Superintendent of Police (Crime) Patna, the retiral dues have not been paid. Thereafter, their mother Kanak Lata Ambastha filed the present writ application and she also died during the pendency of the writ application and petitioners have been substituted. Learned counsel for the State submits that in case a representation giving specific details of the claim as also the copy of the relevant documents in support of the claim is filed, the same shall be considered in accordance with law without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the grievances, as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file representation before the respondent no. 4. In this view of the matter, it is directed that in case such representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order, the above respondent shall consider and dispose of the same by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances raised in the representation could be settled without further delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)