la ^T^v X3V ^OHI^tO^ NOIlVaOWK033V •d'wdoa-ez-s/nNOMiiajMOisiAa^ • •€^^i ('O'D) -nidre^ -IOI.4SIQ mdre-g &ao\o^ vpsjsy '681 -9 'o/y ^UB^-gy Tjqg -O/A\. 'cuB-g rofe-a •»ms/// ddUNIV^ INVOnJdV-MON snsiigA (T)-3)jndre'a'Auoio3 E}ures'68I-a'o/^°sjB3Az£p3gv ^ » ,.'/ . qguig -N'S PqS 'o/S 'qSmS ^OTtf ANvaNaaaa /iNVDnajv £00?7^, A / 'ON uoisiAag IIAI^ HSV3SULIVHH3 ^nasni^^v awLLVDianfdo isnoo HSIH^HI MI ^^ r 1L_ ;:' 'n^' t':'£iLil;.»l iXI-HG-22 sn^F^iT K;-ii«t> s^ss 'WRRi'^liia 1!11:: T^ ^rrarera,. '^aNFis, ra^iray iE^t^-S ^<^<<^ . . , c.'£.'r<o- ^^/A30s <gp sn^iwnwaft^ 31-7-2003 Shri Parag Kotecha, Ad^ocate for the applicant, •^q^-^^'v\wvra ^ f^^ <rai«.i< qT3rf7W3n^I Shri R:N. Jha, Advocatej With consent', heard finj By Chls petiUon, the dated 21-4-2003 passed by case 110. 3/90(8)/2002-03 w| for the non-appUcant. ally. ippllcant challenges the order ftie Kent Control Authority in tiereby the application seeking leave to defend by the applica(at has been refused. Thc non-applicant filcd) Autliorioly for evlctlou of UJ applicant by Registered-ad .Kesearch Centre, Jabatpur a casc bcforc thc Rcnt Control ^e applicaiit cui llie gi-ouiid of banaflde need. On the applic]ation, notice was issyed to the |nd notice fhrough publication was also issued. The appl^cant on 10-3-2003 filed an apploication for condonation the grotuid that hc tiould nol ^>f delay and leave to defend on appear within fhc stipulated period as hls father was adn^itted In Jabalpur Hospltal and toid he he had to remain at [T^'^fe^ HBft XI-HC-22 3^ ^IFfRT4, aifll+1'Ko, 'fSRWT'F: .C-R SH^I'S^ITW ^lfttT - -L it 1;<^''I^--^^"^1^^^^, Jahalpiir for three months.l He also filed an affidavit m support of his contention. Tb4 appUcation was opposed by the groi^nd n'on-applicant ori fhe contention, the appUcant has The appUcant Kas been Auttiorily by the tmpugned service has been effected on fhat in support of the |not ffled any document. Idlsmlssed by the Rent Control jorder on the ground that the PIC .applicant jfhrough ordinary filcd beforc tius Court. 'C^Hi<T!4i-rt HHI?iT ^ 1^?!' <r^^.!< q? Sipgii sn^i notice, Registered notice, afH^ture and by publicatiori iil news papcr and thc applicant ha^ fUcd appUcation for lcayc to defeiid aTler tlu-ee uioiitlis aiitl ruTtticr ttial 110 docuiueiil has been flled in support ofthe cc^itention regarduig Ulness ofthe father of the applicant. Leamed counsel for fh^ applicant subinltted that the medical docuinents regardini; iUness of his father has\been Sbri R.N. Jha, leamcd coun.scl appearing for the non-appllca^it, on the ojlier hand submitted -^ttiat these documents ough^ to have been Hled before ttie [^ft^ ^s^ ^— XI-HC-22 ~TE? •^Mwti, w-Aww, facii'yy sn^r^i K;-]i.+ 3fl^?r 'aRN?^iftg PATHAK/- r« /- _. j ..^z-^;L'2y°5 311^71 ?:RTRR'gfOT T leamed Rent Control Aiithorit^. However since they have bRen filed, the Court below inay co4sider them.. Having considered the Sftcta and circuinstances of the casc and raatcrial on recor^, leavc to dcfcnd is aUowed subjectto the payment ofeosl] Shri Jha further submiltted depositing the monthly rent. Shri Kotecha undertake^ 4il'j<ft-l41-i HIHciT'? fs^Zt iFaK^K ^7 Slfeq 311^1 OfRs. 500/-. that the applicant is not that the appticant wiU deposit all arrcara of rcnt and will cc^ntinuc to^dcposit thc inonthly i-eiil. With the above observatj|on, the petttion is disposed of. In view of the above or^er, M.C.P. No. 845/2003, I.A. No. 5115/203 and LA.Nb. 5146/2003also stfflad disposed tS. Certified copy as per rul^s. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge