1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR W.P.No. 3442/2009 Ramrao s/o Baswantrao @ Dada Deshmukh vs. The State of Maharashtra and others. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. Mr. V.G.Bhamburkar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. A.M.Deshpande, AGP for R-1 and 2. Mr. J.B.Kasat, Adv. For R-3 and 4. Mr. S.D.Chopde, Adv. For R-5,6,7 and 9. CORAM : V.C.DAGA & A.B.CHAUDHARI,JJ DATE : 16.12.2010 Heard. Perused petition. The Registrar is directed to seek explanation from the concerned officer as to why he has accepted reply without proper running pagination in spite of necessary instructions issued in that behalf. At this stage, on the motion made by Mr. V.G.Bhamburkar, learned advocate for the petitioner, he is allowed to withdraw this petition with liberty to seek appropriate information under the R.T.A.. Needless to mention that after receipt of the necessary information, if found to be unsatisfied, it would be open for him to approach appropriate forum as may be available in law. 2` The petition is dismissed in terms of this order with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE patle