IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21317 of 2010 MANEGAR MUKHIYA, S/o late Jhakhar Mukhia. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 28.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that there is no eye-witness to the occurrence and the petitioner is in custody since 01.04.2009, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-VIII, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with S.Tr. No. 445 of 2009 arising out of Darpa P.S. Case No. 26 of 1996 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the brother of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change 2 in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)