IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30826 of 2010 MUKUL @ VINOD MANDAL, S/o Shri Chaturbhuj Mandal. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 13.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 302, 201 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the petitioner had seen his wife, the deceased in compromising position with the co-accused whereafter there was marital discord with them but the matter was sorted out through a Panchayati then the deceased is said to have been taken away by the petitioner after which she became missing. Considering the background of the case, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Tikapatti P.S. Case No. 18 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of 2 the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)