IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41204 of 2009 1. PAN SARKAR YADAV 2. KAMLESH YADAV 3. RAKESH YADAV 4. JAI PRAKASH YADAV 5. SWAROOP YADAV 6. AKHILESH YADAV ------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 4.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for petitioner no.2 namely Kamlesh Yadav and learned counsel for the State. There is specific allegation upon this petitioner that he abused the informant in name of his caste in specific words (Saale Chamar) and the place is disclosed by witness in paragraph-6 of the case diary as Chauk, the public view. If that is not of serious nature can be considered in regular side as anticipatory bail petition is not maintainable. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. However, petitioner no.2 is directed to surrender and move for regular bail. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)