- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3951/2009 Kum.Trupti d/o Laxman Thakur. ...Petitioner.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents... ..... Shri A.H. Koralkar, Advocate for petitioner. Shri K.G. Patil, AGP for respondent nos.1 & 3. Shri M.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent no.2. Shri M.N. Navandar, Advocate for respondent no.4. ..... CORAM: P.V. HARDAS & R.K. DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE: 06.07.2009 PER COURT: This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, by which the petitioner prays for issuance of a writ directing the respondent no.2 to - 2 - decide the caste claim of the petitioner and also prays for restraining the respondents from taking adverse action in respect of cancellation of the admission of the petitioner for M.Sc. Course till the decision of his caste claim by the scrutiny committee. Shri Koralkar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, very fairly states that pursuant to the earlier directions issued by this Court, the caste claim of the petitioner has been invalidated and the petitioner would be filing a substantive petition challenging the decision of the scrutiny committee and, therefore, seeks to withdraw the petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (R.K. Deshpande,J.) (P.V. Hardas, J.) ndk/c670910