IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No.3033 of 2010 Date of Decision: January 07, 2011 Puran Singh. …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. B.R. Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana for the respondent. **** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This revision petition is filed by the revisionist- petitioner against the judgment dated 14.10.2010 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Faridabad, as well as judgment dated 03.11.2009/06.11.2009 passed by the CRR No.3033 of 2010 learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Faridabad, whereby petitioner is convicted under Sections 304-A/279 IPC and was awarded sentence of one year under Section 304-A IPC and fine of Rs.2000/- and two months under Section 279 IPC and fine of Rs. 500/-. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner does not challenge the conviction of the petitioner. He further states that since sentence awarded is one year, hence, petitioner is liable to be released on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, while maintaining the conviction of the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with the direction that petitioner be released on probation under Section 4(1) of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, for a period of five months on furnishing his personal bond and undertaking with one surety to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court that he will keep peace and be of good behaviour. In case he is found to be indulged in such like illegal activities, sentence awarded by the Court below shall stand revived automatically. However, fine imposed upon the petitioner is enhanced to Rs.25,000/-. The petitioner is directed to deposit the above said amount, within one month from today, with the Trial Court. On deposit so being made, the Trial Court shall issue notice to the legal 2 CRR No.3033 of 2010 representatives of the deceased and disburse the amount to them forthwith. It is made clear that in case enhanced amount is not deposited, as directed above, this revision petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed and the order of the Court below shall stand revived automatically. With above mentioned modification, this revision petition stands disposed of. January 7, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 3