2909caa49.11.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION (A) NO.49 OF 2011 IN APPEAL AGAINST ORDER ST.NO.3634 OF 2011 SHRI ANKUSH S/O RAGHOJI PISE AND OTHERS V/S SHRI VINOD S/O MANIKRAO BANGADE ........................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................................ CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 29. SEPTEMBER, 2011. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the applicants and the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The delay caused is condoned. The application stands disposed of. By consent of the parties, the Appeal From Order Bearing St.No.3634 of 2011 is taken up for admission and interim order. The office is directed to register the same. The trial Court has passed an order of injunction restraining the defendant nos.1 to 5 temporarily from alienating, transferring, selling or otherwise creating third party interest in the suit property by themselves or through the power of attorney holders, assignee or any other persons claiming under them till final disposal of the suit. It is not in dispute that the property in question has .....2/- 2909caa49.11.odt 2 been transferred in favour of the defendant nos.3 to 5 and they are in possession of the property. The defendant nos.3 to 5 have not filed any appeal and it seems that they have accepted the order of injunction. This appeal is filed by the defendant nos.1 and 2 who are the original owners of the suit property. The learned Counsel appearing for the applicants, submits that the defendant nos.1 and 2 have already sold the property to the defendant nos.3 to 5 and they are in possession. In view of this, there is no question of interference in the order passed by the courts below. The appeal is dismissed. JUDGE BrWankhede ...../-