1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION LODGING NO.1323 OF 2006 PETITION LODGING NO.1323 OF 2006 PETITION LODGING NO.1323 OF 2006 Anusaya Gangaram Dawal ..Petitioner Vs. Mahararashtra Housing & Area Development Authority & Ors..Respondents Mr. R.V. Govilkar, for the Petitioner Mr. G.W. Mattos, AGP for respondents 1 to 3. CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE: 10th July,2006 P.C. . The claim for consideration by the petitioner has also been considered by us while disposing of Writ Petition No.1103 of 2006 on 27th June 2006. The case of the petitioner will be governed by the order passed by us in that petition. 2. In the event the petitioner is granted premises at Worli, Mumbai, the petitioner’s right to other premises stands extinguished. On behalf of the respondent No.1 learned Counsel seeks additional time of 15 days to decide the petitioners claim for 2 eligibility. Time to decide the the petitioner’s eligibility is extended by a further period of 15 days from today. . With the above observation petition stands disposed of. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J). J). J).