1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5112 OF 2010 (Ramkrushna Ramchandra Patil & Anr. vs. Niranjan Glabrao Badge & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. OCTOBER 20, 2010. Heard Shri Dani, learned counsel for the petitioner. The trial Court has refused to issue witness summons to Nagpur Improvement Trust (NIT). The learned counsel states that earlier witness for society accepted that he paid an amount of Rs.1,000/- to NIT and also furnished list of plots to NIT. However, this reason is not made out in the application before the trial Court. The trial Court has looked into relevant material and has rejected the application. I do not find any jurisdictional error and though the trial Court has found that the provisions of Order 16, Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code to be mandatory, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. With liberty to the petitioners to challenge the impugned order after the suit is finally decided, writ petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE *GS.