IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.23231 of 2010 Date of Decision : December 23, 2010. Balwinder Singh Bhatti .....Petitioner versus ICICI Home Finance Company Ltd. and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.A.K.Walia, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner alongwith his brother Gurpiar Singh Bhatti is said to have availed the domestic loan of Rs.12,50,000/- from the ICICI Home Finance Company Limited-respondent No.1. It is alleged that though the entire loan amount has been paid as per the full and final settlement dated 12.3.2010 (Annexure P-2) alongwith due interest, however, the amount of Rs.2,23,758/- said to have been deposited by the petitioner in excess, is not being refunded to him by respondent No.1 despite an assurance given in writing to this effect. The petitioner has requested the respondent-authorities in this regard but it is alleged that no action is being taken by respondent No.1 to refund the excess amount. C.W.P.No .23231 of 2010 2 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the documents placed on record as well as the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to the respondent-authorities to consider the above noticed claim of the petitioner and refund the excess amount, if any, to which the petitioner is found entitled to, within a period of one month from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. December 23, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE