1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2162 OF 2005 Ashok Mahadev Kadu and others. ... Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. --- Mr.Prakash Shetty, for the Applicants. Mr.A.S.Gadkari, A.P.P. for the State-Respondent.. CORAM: A.M.Khanwilkar,J. DATED: 4th April, 2005. P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. After hearing for some time, when I indicated my mind , the learned counsel for the applicant prayed that the applicant be permitted to withdraw this application with liberty to file a fresh application for bail after filing of the chargesheet Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. 2. The learned A.P.P. On instructions of the concerned police officer 2 who is present today in the Court assures that as the investigation in so far as the present applicants is substantially completed, the chargesheet will be filed at least against them within three weeks from today, even though the other accused are absconding. That assurance is accepted. It is made clear that the fresh application filed by the applicants shall be considered on its own merit. --- (A.M.Khanwilkar,J)