IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2569 OF 2009 Satish Eknath Zalake & Anr. ... Petitioners. V/s. Laxman Raghu Zalake & Anr. ... Respondents. Mr. Rupesh Nalavade for the Petitioners. None for the Respondents. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 19TH JUNE, 2009. P.C. :- Heard Mr. Nalavade, learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioners. Perused the interim order passed by the Lower Appellate Court granting the stay of execution of the decree challenged by the Respondents before it. Having perused the Petition and the annexures thereto, so also the decree of the Trial Court, I am of the view that the interim order of the Lower Appellate Court requires no interference in my jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. More so, when it is not demonstrated to be vitiated by any error apparent or perverse, the Petition is dismissed. However, the Lower Appellate Court should endevour and dispose off the Appeal expeditiously. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.