ilKd .j( 8i "> A. C("i c/^/siu 2— .R^^ 1 PETiTIONER ,^// .°'.•••YWAe~" ^^" .--"^"y' •^ Devnish Ekka, S/o Shri Ekka, aged about Assistant Teacher, ^s 'iO ^ ^' •"'.e?:' . ^.^ .»;«•' ^ •^' ^- \°L^ /~^ ^' Education.D.K.S. Bhawan, Raspur (C.G.) /-" Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur ,G.) ¥R HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASin W. P.(S1 No. 9 of 2007 Petitioner Devnirii Ekka Versus Re^iondents : State of Chharttisgarh ond o-thers 58: Hon'ble Mr. Justtce Satish K. Agnihotri. J Present: Mr. Anil Singh ftajput, Advocate for •thepetitioner. ttr. Satish Supta, Dy. 6ovt. Advocote for the StaWre^onclents. ''!* OR&ER 0'assed on Ihis 13th &uy of February, 2007) 1. The petitioner was appointed vide order dated 12.7.95 (Annexure P/l) as Assistcnl Teacher on fixed pay scale of Rs. 1200/-. After comptetion of two years probation, he wos gronted regular pay scale. 2. L«omedcounset appearing for the petitioner submits 'that •the iaaie Swolved in the case is asto whether the petitioner is entitted to regutar poy scale w.e.f. the date of initwt appointment or (rfter completion of probation period. 3. The issue invotved, herein was considered by th& Madhya Pnxdedi Sta-te Administrative Tribunat, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukont Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & o-thers), wherein it wffs held that the simibrty situated teochers are entitled to regular pay scute w.e.f. the da+e of initial appointment. The matter wass taken-up to tiie Hon'ble Supreme Court- in Special Ledn/e Petition (Civit) No. 6892/93. Thesaid petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of Ihe Tribunal to -the effect -fhat 1+ie Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from date of initial appointment. 4. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner further ajbmits that this Court-, while considering the same issi»in t-1ar Prosad farre ^ others Vs. S-ta-te of Chhaftisgarh & others (W.P. (5) No. 5191 of 2006) by order dated 3.10.2006, has gnmted regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. 5. Leamed counsel appearing for the partfes jointly submit that -this case is squarely covered by •the decision of this Court in -fhe cose of Har Prasad Kurre & others Vs. Sta-te of Chhattis9arh & o-thers (&ipro). Bablu > 6. In view of that, this petition is disposed of m the sam®terms. No order as to cos+s. oa Sd/- atisbK.Agnihoi t-i Judge