1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:05.04.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.RAJESWARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.M.AKBAR ALI Habeas Corpus Petition (MD) No.213 of 2011 Murugan, S/o.Kumaravel ..Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Thirumangalam, Madurai District. 3.Balachandar 4.Rajeswari ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body or person of the petitioner's daughter Anandhi, D/o.Murugan, aged about 27 years, before this Court and set her at liberty. For Petitioner :Mr. R.Murugappan For Respondents :Mr.P.N.Pandithurai, 1 and 2 Addl.Public.Pleader. O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by S.RAJESWARAN,J) The petitioner, who is the father of the detenue by name Anandhi, has filed this habeas corpus petition to trace his daughter Anandhi, aged about 27 years, a B.Sc.Degree holder, who was working in ICICI Bank at Thirumangalam branch and reported to be missing from 16.02.2011. According to the petitioner, when the marriage was arranged and fixed for their daughter on 23.02.2011, she had left home and missing from 16.02.2011. Since the complaint given to the respondent police was not seriously taken, the present petition has been filed. 2.On notice, the 2nd respondent police has produced the detenue, along with the 3rd respondent, today. When we interviewed the girl to know her mind, she stated that she has married the 3rd respondent on 16.02.2011 and since then she has been living with the 3rd respondent happily. We also interviewed the 3rd respondent, who is said to have https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 married the detenue girl. He admitted that the detenue girl is his wife having married her on 16.02.2011 and both of them are living happily. We also called the petitioner and appraised him of these facts. Since the detenue girl has left the house and married the 3rd respondent on her own, he is not prepared to accept her marriage and consequently he is not prepared to take her with him also. The detenue girl also in turn not interested in going with the petitioner/her father. 3.In view of the fact that the daughter of the petitioner/the detenue, being a major aged about 27 years, has gone out on her own and married the 3rd respondent, there is nothing further remains in the petition to be considered. 4.In the result, the habeas corpus petition is dismissed and the detenue girl is not in illegal custody of the 3rd respondent. gb Sd/- Assistant Registrar[Crl side] /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.The District Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Thirumangalam, Madurai District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 cc to Mr.R.Murugappan, Advocate Sr.No.12686. Order in HCP(MD)No.213/2011 Dated:05.04.2011 2P/5C RPB 05.05.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/