The Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Subhash Reddy Writ Petition No.2306 of 2010 Order: In this Writ Petition, the petitioners seek declaration, by way of Mandamus, that the action of respondent Nos.1 to 3 in dispossessing them from their house property situated in Survey No.35/1 in an extent of 0.03 cents in Sirigindalapadu Village, Rampachodavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, in pursuance of eviction order, dated 21-05-2009, passed by the first respondent in CMA.No.15/2005, is illegal and arbitrary, and consequently, to direct respondent Nos.1 to 3 not to dispossess them from the above- mentioned property pending disposal of the revision filed by them before respondent No.5. In the affidavit, filed in support of the Writ Petition, it is stated that the petitioners, who are non-tribals, own house property in an extent of 0-03 cents in Survey No.35/1 situated at Sirigindalapadu Village, Rampachodavaram Mandal, East Godavari District. It is further stated that about 20 years back, they have constructed the said house under weaker sections housing scheme and have been residing therein, but at the instance of the fourth respondent, the Special Deputy Tahsildar, Rampachodavaram, filed L.T.R.P.No.210 of 2004 before the second respondent- Special Deputy Collector, who dismissed the same on 31st July, 1993, on the ground that the possession of the petitioners over the land in question was in accordance with the Regulations. Aggrieved by the same, the fourth respondent filed C.M.A.No.15/2005, before the first respondent-appellate authority, who passed the impugned eviction order on 21-05-2009. By the said order, the first respondent- appellate authority has ordered that the said land be taken into Government custody so as to use the same as a pathway. It is further stated that as against the said eviction order, petitioners have filed a revision petition along with an application seeking interim stay before the fifth respondent-Government on 27th January, 2010, but however, no orders have, so far, been passed. It is the grievance of the petitioners that during pendency of the revision and the stay petition before the fifth respondent-revisional authority, respondents are taking steps for their eviction. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare appearing for the respondents. In view of pendency of the petitioners’ revision before the fifth respondent, this Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. The question as to whether the petitioners’ possession over the land in question is in contravention of the amended Regulation 1 of 1970 to the Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Areas) Land Transfer Regulations, 1959 (for short ‘the Regulations’) or not is required to be considered by the fifth respondent-revisional authority. In view of pendency of the revision petition, it is not desirable to record any findings on merits at this stage. Since the petitioners claim title and continuous possession over the land in question by constructing a house and residing therein for the past twenty years, and since the second respondent-primary authority has rejected the claim of the fourth respondent herein, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition with a direction to the fifth respondent to dispose of the revision petition filed by the petitioners on 27-01-2010, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till final orders are passed in the said revision petition and communicated to the petitioners, eviction order passed by the fourth respondent vide CMA.No.15 of 2007, dated 21-05-2009, shall remain suspended. Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ R.Subhash Reddy, J Date: 5th February, 2010 lur