C^- •'^zr-cr liiS.iQS IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONERS sft l-yv ^- A< l^^^/ (^M^ .-^'^ ^'^< l<<^ is"^ y.^.-' <^r--' \..-" ,t.' "f' W^.J^ l No. -?ogz. 72009 : 1. /TV[ayaram Karsh, S/o Nathuram. Karsh, aged about 43 years, Occupation- Head Master Governnient Primary School, Kenabhatha, Block Bamnindih, Distt. Janjgir (Champa) (C.G.). 2. Umashankar Khuntey, S/o Bhaiyaram Khuntey, aged about 42 years, Occupation Head Master Government Primary School, Semariya, Block Bamnindih, Distt. Janjgir (Champa) (C.G.). • VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. The District Education Officer, District Janjgir (Champa) (C.G.) 3. The Block Education Officer, Block Bamnindih, District Janjgir (Champa) (C.G.). / 4. The Treasury Account and Pension, District Janjgir (Champa) (C.G.). 'u :;K!1 CS) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^-f^s i&'r jne; r^' B| i^vuni vr ^r WT' WRiT PETSTJQN.tS >2 Mavaram Karsh & Anofhei iT3 isrh i\^^^ S, i's^iik ^' State of Chhattisi 'tJde226oftheC iie Bench:: Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Asnihotri.u. iri A.V. Srldhar, Panel tawyer for the Stste. M ,' 'l a=- (Passed on this 3'°dayof December, 2009) With the consent of iearned counsel appearing for the partles, the petition is hsard finaiiy. Af fhe very outset, iearned coansel appearing ?or the petitioners submits.that this petition is squareiycovered by the decisions *h"iff rk/'tii?^- yt'sQ&Stf^ i"i 't^il P f%Ai Mrt SS??? r-if ^fi'Th'7 ^r^hsnS ^a?wu IHiS. wOUfi, pcaSSSQ SH yv.r". (^^ i^O.O^S d ^W^" iarfa'iffHi ri^sil Sanjare and;0thers v. State of Chphattisgarh and others) and other connected matters S W.P. (S) No.4130 of (Gopesh Kumar Verma v. The State Govt. of Chhaitisgarh and ancther) and other connectsd matters. Learned counse! prays that. simiiar reilef may be granted in case of the present petitioner aiso. ^ At thls juncture, iearned counsel appearlng for the State submits that in the event .the petitionei-s submit a detaiied representation the ssme shail be considereti and decidea', in accordsnce wlth iaw.and m view of the decisions of this Court rendered in Dharii Ram Banjare (supra) & Gopesh Kumar.Verma (supra), subject to verlfication offacts. in view of foregoJng, according to the iearned counsei appearing for fhe petitloners nothing Survlves in this petition for a£SiU€21CSIiOas. A^ lih <nai'^s'S''f^.y^ i^ '^ 5. Accordsngjy, e writ petstson is aisppsed OT. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 'l