:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1787 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 1787 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 1787 OF 2008 D. K. Chohan Developers Engineers & Contractors ..Petitioners versus Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. Chirag Balsara i/b. Mr. S. D. Mulye for the Petitioners. Mr. N. A. Shaikh for the Respondent No. 1. Mr. A. M. Kulkarni for the Respondent No. 2. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. DATE : 20TH AUGUST, 2008. DATE : 20TH AUGUST, 2008. DATE : 20TH AUGUST, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard. 2. The only contention of the petitioners that it is willing to demolish the passage area shown in yellow as demanded by the Municipal Corporation in its letter dated 5.1.2008 at Exhibit ’I’. According to the petitioners, the respondent No.2 is obstructing the said demolition, as a result the Municipal Corporation is not giving the Occupation :2: Certificate. 3. In the circumstances, the appropriate remedy for the petitioners would be to file a suit for preventing the alleged obstruction by the respondent No. 2. The petition is therefore dismissed. (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.)