IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1271 of 2009 Kishori Das s/o late Bhukhlu Das, resident of Mohalla – East Lohanipur, p.O. + P.S. – Kadamkuan, Patna Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Patna 2. The Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4. The Special Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 5. The Uni9on of India through the Secretary, Department , Personnel and Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievance and Pension, Govt. of India, Patna 6. The Director (Services), Department of Personnel and Training, Govt. of India, New Delhi 7. The Comptroller Auditor General of India, New Delhi 8. The Accountant General (A & E), Bir Chand Patel Path, R. Block, Patna 9. Smt. Deepika Padda, s/o not known, Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 10. Shri Anup Mukherjee, s/o not known, Principal Secretary, Rrural Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 11. Sri Raj Kumar Singh s/o not known, Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 12. Sri Naveen Kumar s/o not known, Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 13. Sri K.C. Saha s/o not known, Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Basant Kumar Chaudhary, Sr. Advocate For the respondents: Mr. Roy Shivaji Nath, AAG IV Mr. Amrendra Kumar, AC to AAG IV Mr. Madhuresh Prasad, AC to AG --- 7 12/5/2010 Heard Mr. Basant Kumar Chaudhary, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Roy Shivaji Nath, 2 learned counsel for the State. Mr. Chaudhary, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, in course of hearing realized that there are certain contours in this writ petition, which cannot be put on the pedestal of a public interest litigation. We must fairly say, the stand taken by Mr. Chaudhary at this juncture is appreciable and we do appreciate the same. Realization may come late but when it comes at the appropriate stage, it is to be appreciated. We so do. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn. Neyaz/ ( Dipak Misra, CJ.) (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)