In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CR No.2756 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on 27.4.2011. Aman Mehta @ Amanjeet Kaur -- Petitioner vs. Rajinder Soi --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Vikas Bali, Advocate,for the petitioner Rakesh Kumar Jain, J, (Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 19.4.2011 by which evidence of the petitioner/tenant has been ordered to be closed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the eviction petition is of the year 2002. He further submits that the landlord himself had closed his evidence in 2010 and evidence of the petitioner had started in 2011, therefore, learned counsel prays that one more opportunity be granted to the petitioner/tenant to lead her entire evidence. In view thereof, the impugned order is set aside and one more opportunity is granted to the petitioner/tenant to produce her entire evidence on the date to be fixed by the Rent Controller but this shall be subject to payment of Rs. 5000/- as costs which shall be paid by the petitioner/tenant to the landlord at the time of leading evidence. CR No.2756 of 2011 (O&M) -2- It is made clear that this order is peremptory in nature and if the cost is not paid, then this revision shall stand dismissed. A copy of this order be given to the learned counsel for the petitioner under the signatures of Bench Secretary of this Court. 27.4.2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge