c? H // HE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR K)\ mw @mmh‘ EVIEW PETITION NO. \5\ OF 2010 R W1; Madan Gopal Rajput, S/o Late Shri Khushi Ram Rajput, aged about 58 years, R/o M-22 (wrongiy mentioned as M-21 in the impugned order), Avanti Vihar, Near Shiv Temple, Telibandha, Raipur (C.G.) ‘ REVIEW PETlTlON UNDER RULE 90 READ WITH RULE 87 OF THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH RULES 2007 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 05. 8.2010 PASS D BY THIS HON’BLE COURT lN W.P. (227) NO. 4817/2000 ...V.VV.. V E R S U S (Kgm.............. NON-APPLICANTS . ('1. Board of Revenue Chhattisgarh RESPONDENTS Through President, Circuit Court ' at Raipur (C.G.) /2. New Tilak Nagar Sahakari Griha Nirman Samiti, Through its President, Shri Shankar Dayal Mishra, Resident of Shanti Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 3 The Additional Collector . / (Revenue), RaipurDistrict Raipur (C.G.) 4- The Tahsildar, Raipur, Dist Raipur W ' (co) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (227) NQ. 4817 OF 2008 RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION F INDIA. (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri Devendra Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri D.S. Jain, Advocate with Shri SS. Rajput, Advocate for the respondent N0. 2. Shri Rakesh Jha, Dy. G.A. for the State/respondents No. 3 8L 4. None for the respondent No. l. Co/V >5 'V/f) ORAL- oxanww (Passed on 05/08/2010) Heard. Order impugned dated 18/7/2008 passed by the Board of Revenue in review case No. R.W./l4/R/A-70/52/2007 dismissing review petition filed against the order dated 29/5/07 passed by Board of Revenue in revision ease No. RN/14/R/A— 70/4 14/2006 perused. h) W O PETITIONER: ’adan Gopal Rajput, S/o Late Shri Khushi Ram Rajput, aged about 58 years, R/o M-22 (Wrongly mentioned as M—21 in the impugned order), Avanti Vihar, Near Shiv Temple, Telibandha, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). VERSUS RESPONDENTS .-" The Board of Revenue Chhattisgarh Through President, (Circuit Court at Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 2W New Tilak Nagar Sahakari Griha Nirman w‘M’ Samiti, Through its President, Shri Shankar Dayal Mishra, Resident of Shanti Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). /G. The Additional Collector (Revenue), Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh). ‘dwf; 4': The Tahsildar, Raipur, Dist, Raipur (Chhattisgarhy mmmmlwwww mw At the outset, counsel for the rcspondent No‘ 2 submits that on 23/9/08 petitioner has been evicted form the encroachment land. Order dared 29/5/07 reveals that Board of revenuc quashed subordinate Court and also review Court and has directed to proceed further. Operative Para-7 reads as follows:~ “7.W$Wam§m%§a#a%amzr ww§$$WW$WWWW§l W,Wwwa%néfatmiewmt WWW$Wwmaw WWmsr’ Order impugned dated 18/7/2008 does not suffer from any illegality virtually Board of Revenue has provided. an opportunity of hearing to both the parties, I do not find any illegality in the order impugned requiring any interference in terms of under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, this petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed No order as to costs x/ i k Review Petition N0. 13 1/2010 vfV Review Petition N0. 131/2010 [Madan Gopal Rajput V/s. Board of Revenue & others] has been filed on 07.09.2010 by counsel for the petitioner. The petition is arising out of the order dated 05.08.2010, passed in W.P.(227) No. 4817/2010, passed by Single Bench of Hon’ble Mr. Justice T.P. Sharma. 1 The above record is submitted in compliance of Rule 90(2) of the High Court of Chhattisgarh Rules, 2007 for listing of this petition before the Hon’ble Judges in chamber for consideration. Sdl- ARU) Addl. Registrar (Judl.) Hon’kg‘e Mr. Justice T.P. ‘Sharma (In chainber) ([1 wean VIMM and auQm £2“ 1n e % £16 Wef‘ Qfwt£ Wg (gZty CQN/béQ (iégr) Uwwagw _ , Qax9£<g€i m. gm flit. mo Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge .