FARAD CONTINUTION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.930l of 2005 -------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office Court or Judge’s Order Memorandum of Coram appearence,Court’s Orders & Directions and Registrar’s Order --------------------------------------------------- Mr V.N.Tayade for petitioner Ms P Tendulkar with M S Karnik for respondent .no.2 Mr R.D Rane GP for State Mr.P.B.Shivsath for respondent no.3 CORAM:V.G.PALSHIKAR AND CORAM:V.G.PALSHIKAR AND CORAM:V.G.PALSHIKAR AND V.R.KINGAOKAR JJ. V.R.KINGAOKAR JJ. V.R.KINGAOKAR JJ. DATED l0.4.2006 DATED l0.4.2006 DATED l0.4.2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. . By this petition, petitioner claims a writ of mandamus directing respondents to grant approval to the petitioner’s appointment. Notice as to why the petition should not be admitted was issued and reply has been filed by the respondents wherein it is categorically observed that the petitioner has alternate remedy of approaching the one man grievance committee appointed by the State. The petitioner therefore has effective alternate remedy to claim approval to his appointment before the committee making a grievance of the fact that though the petitioner appears to be entitled to such relief it is not being granted. Inspite of petitioner being not successful before that committee, further remedy is open to the petitioner. Hence permitting the petitioner to avail those remedies, petition disposed of. (V.G.Palshikar J) (V.R.Kingaokar J)