THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.Nos.13953, 14298, 14299 and 14922 of 1999 COMMON ORDER: In all these writ petitions, common questions of law and fact arise for consideration, and therefore they are being disposed of by this common order. It appears, all the petitioners are working as non-technical Work Inspectors in the A.P. State Housing Corporation Limited and their services in the said category have been regularized by the Corporation. It is their grievance that they are entitled for being converted to the post of Junior Assistant on completion of five years of service and possessing Degree qualification. Further, they are also entitled for conversion as Technical Work Inspectors on possessing certificate in Draughtsman (Civil Engineering). No such conversion had taken place either in the post of Junior Assistant or in the cadre of Technical Work Inspectors though such benefit was extended to other co-employees in the Corporation. The case of the petitioners is that in spite of making several representations, their service particulars have not been submitted to the first respondent, as a result of which, their cases could not be considered for promotion to the category of Junior Assistants and juniors to them have been promoted ignoring their seniority. These writ petitions, in fact were filed at a time when the petitioners were promoted as Junior Assistants and transferred to other districts vide impugned proceedings dated 8.6.1999 of the first respondent praying that their services in the cadre of non-technical Work Inspectors should be counted for the purpose of seniority in the cadre of Junior Assistants. Though the writ petitions were admitted, no stay was granted. It appears, the respondents have considered the cases of the petitioners and retained them in their respective places. Insofar as conversion with retrospective effect is concerned, it is for the respondents to consider such matters after examining the case of the petitioners in detail. In fact, it appears, during the pendency of writ petitions, petitioners have submitted detailed representations on 25.11.2006 and 2.12.2006 to the first respondent. Under those circumstances, without expressing any opinion on merits, the first respondent is directed to consider the representations purported to have been made by the petitioners on 25.11.2006 and 2.12.2006 and pass appropriate orders as per law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioners. With the above direction, the writ petitions are disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 27.4.2007 Note: Issue order in one week. B/o DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.Nos.13953, 14298, 14299 and 14922 of 1999 27.4.2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P.Nos.13953, 14298, 14299 and 14922 of 1999 Date: 27th April, 2007 Between: M.Venkata Ramaiah . Petitioner in W.P.No.13953 of 1999 M.Rammurthy . Petitioner in W.P.No.14298 of 1999 T.Veerabhadram . Petitioner in W.P.No.14299 of 1999 V.Venkateswara Rao . Petitioner in W.P.No.14922 of 1999 And The Managing Director, A.P. State Housing Corporation Ltd., Hyderabad & others. .. Respondents in all the W.Ps.