,/RTOF 1TTTC.C.* AT RTI .-Q-J- >pl u' S ^£^/^/V? '^ ^T &yy^ -,A:4.:-,s-=,— sniiViig.r' &B Versus Idhura? Kew ion of Late ^hri ©uumwiKewat, aged aboutA yeors, Resident of Vjliage Barari (Mudpar). Post . Bhoyna, Polics Station Arjuni, Tdisil and &istrict bhamtari (C.&.) 1. Stute of Chhattlsgar+t, Through The Secretary, Water Resources &epa"tfflen+, D.K.S. ihawan, Roipur (C.6.), '. Tlie Executi've Engineer, Wate" Manaqement &ivisioh Rudri, Tahsil and District Dhamturi (c.e.) 3. The Sub Divisional C-fficer, Mahanoidi Jalashoyo! Panyoina, Sub &lv'lsion No. 8 Rudn, Tdisil and bistrict Cihamtari (C.6.) 'i-^kl^ ktw T.;/>A; HOH DI©fTiF, J ySTI^ f.. Present; Mr. P.P. Srfiu, Adyocate forthe petitioner. Mr. Arv'md Oubey, Ptnei Lowyer- for the State/respbndents. pcssed on this 19 bay of March, 2007) ^ By' this petition, leorned counsei appecring for the petitioner submits thot the petitioner emplayed in the year4984 in the office of the Water Manaqement Division Rudri, Tahsil and District &hamtari as Sanqman and the petitioner, has worked for more than.15 years as ©ongmon.He a relief that the petitioner bemg permanent gangman be retired at ;3{t£, UM'W Vi ^» years in accordance with the Chhattisgorh Shaskiya Sevak r (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhiniyaii, 1967 (for ahort the Ast, 1967 ) with Fundamenta! Ru!e (fqr short F.R. )56. According to leorned counsel for is petitioner, the petittener at+ainei the stutus of permanent emptoyee, as defined under Rule 2(e) of the Chhuttisgarh CA'orkcharged md Contingency Paid Employees) Pension Rules, V979 (for short 'the Rules, 1979'5. frdmed under Article 309 of the Constitutlon of India; After hwing attained the status of the permanent empk-yee the petitioner retire on attainting the age of 62 yeors on superannuutfon under the provisions of the Act, 1967. 3. epunsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the of the petitione" is squar'e'y covered by the decision of this Cowt on 4 Janusry, 2007'in W.P. No. 108/2005 (Sovind vs. State of Chhattisgar-h A others) and other connected matters. A E l. Learned counsei' <ypeu"ing for the respondents/State does nc't dispute the submissions by tearned counsel for the petitioner. 5. Accordingly', ths petitionw, who is permanent gangman, is entitted tc retire on ottaining the age of 62 jn accor'dance tvith the Act, 1967. Tne petition is uccording.'y al'owed. No order as to costs. 6. Consequenti-y', I..4. No. 01, application for stffy'/interim relief, stands J:^^_<^,^^J _^£ Cisposea OT. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ;ubh3sh ^