PETITIONERS PLAINTIFFS HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra. J. M.C.C.No. 245 of 2010 1. Lala S/o Jagbandhu Rawat. aged about 40 years <~'.\ Versus RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. 2. Palu, S/o Jagbandhu Rawat, aged about 38 years 3. Diwali S/o Jagbandhu Rawat, aged about 36 years 4. Bihari, S/o Jagbandhu Rawat, aged about 34 5. Namo, S/o Jagbandhu Rawat, aged about 19 years 6. Tilai, D/o Jagbandhu, aged about 32 years 7. Shambhu, S/o Jagbandhu, aged about 24 years 8. Sanyasi. S/o Shyamkumar. aged about 60 years 9. Kirtan S/o Shyam Kumar, aged about 45 years 10. Devraj S/o Shyamkumar. aged about 30 years 11. Barat Kunwar D/o Shyamkumar, aged about 27 years 12. Puran S/o Parsu Rawat, aged about 65 years 13. Kripa Ram S/o Parsuram. aged about 45 years 14. Jhilmalhin Wjdow of Jagbandhu, aged about 65 years, all resident of village Samaruma, Tahsil Gharghoda, Distt. Raigarh (CG) Satyabhama D/o Shyamsundar, aged about 55 years, R/o Village Garjanjor Tahsil Himgir, Distt. Surdergarh (Orissa) Jema D/o Shyamsundar, aged about 50 years, R/o Saraipali Tahsil, Gharghoda, Distt. Raigarh (CG) Jaipal S/o Duryodhan Rawat, aged about 50 years, R/o Jhalmala Tahsil and Distt. Raigarh (CG) 4. Bhuri, D/o Duryodhan Rawat, aged about 45 years 5. Kendo, S/o Duryodhan Rawat aged about 46 years, Respondents No. 4 and 5 are R/o village Bhalumar, Tahsil Gharghoda, Distt. Raigarh (CG) 6. Rajkumari, D/o Duryodhan, aged about 42 years, R/o of village Aamuda, Tahsil and Distt. Raipur 7. Dilkumar, D/o Duryodhan, aged about 46 years, R/o village Kanika Tahsil Himgiri & Distt. Sundergarh (Orissa) 8. Dulo S/o Duryodhan aged about 36 years. 9. Amrit Lal S/o Tilakram, aged about 45 years, Respondents No. 8 and 9 are R/o Samaruma, Tahsil Gharghoda, Distt. Raigarh (CG) l^111"111"1"^ 10. Pawan S/o Ghasiya, aged about 35 years, R/o village Baihamuda, Tahsil Gharghoda, Distt. Raigarh (CG) 11. Shrawan S/o Ghasiya, aged about 37 years 12. Hara, D/o Ghasiya, aged about 34 years 13. Basant s/o Ghasiya, aged about 40 years Respondents No. 11 to 13 are R/o village Saraibhaddar, Tahsil and Distt. Raigarh (CG) 14. Usatram S/o Mohan, aged about 45 years, R/o village Samaruma, Tahsil Ghargoda, Distt. Raigarh 15. Amurto D/o Mohan, aged about 32 years, R/o village Dhunda, Tahsil and Distt. Jharsugda (Orissa) 16. Rampyari, D/o Dasrath, aged about 45 years, R/o Mahlai, Tehsil and Distt. Raigarh (CG) 17. Smt. Ranjna Jindal, W/o Rakesh Kumar Jindal, aged about 32 years, R/o Nayaganj, Raigarh, Tahsil and Distt. Raigarh (CG) 18. State of Chhattisgarh, through Distt. Collector, Raigarh(CG) 5.5.2010: Mr. V.K. Pandey, counset for the petitioners. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State. The petitioners have filed this application for restoration of W.P.(c) No.5859/07, which was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 27.6.2008 for wantofprosecution. The petitioners have also filed an application (IA No.01) for condonation of delay as the instant petition has been preferred with a delay of 640 days as per office note dated 27th April, 2010. After considering the reasons assigned in the application for condonation of delay, 1 find that the petitioners have not assigned any sufficient reason for preferring this petition with an inordinate delay of 640 days. Accordingly, the application (IA No.01) is rejected. Consequently. MCC for restoration ofwrit petition is also dismissed as barred by limitation. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge