IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.645 of 2008 RAKESH KUMAR JHA SON OF LATE NARESH CHANDRA JHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE TINGHARIYA, P.S. KURSELA, DISTRICT KATIHAR ………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE HOME COMMISSIONER, GOVT. OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE COMMISSIONER, BHAGALPUR DIVISION, BHAGALPUR 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BHAGALPUR, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR 6. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BHAGALPUR, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR 7. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NAUGACHHIA, DISTRICT NAUGACHHIA 8. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, BIHPUR POLICE STATION, DISTRICT NAUGACHHIA 9. MANORANJAN JHA @ MANOJ JHA S/O RAMESH CHANDRA JHA 10. DILIP KR. JHA S/O RAMESH CHANDRA JHA 11. RUPLATA JHA WIFE OF RAMESH CHANDRA JHA 12. WIFE OF DILIP KR. JHA NO.9 TO 12 ARE RESIDENT OF BHRAMANPUR, P.S. BIHPUR, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR ………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 2.3.2009 When the matter is taken up, the only grievance of the petitioner is that though charge sheet has been submitted in Bihpur P.S.case No.7 of 2004 but has been submitted only against the husband of the deceased and no other accused. Further the informant has not been made a witness in the case. Having heard Mr. Subodh Kumar Jha for the petitioner and A.C. to G.A.II for the State, I am of the opinion that the petitioner has remedy before the Court in which the report has been filed. In that view of the matter, no positive direction needs 2 to be given in the present case. Petitioner, if so advised, may take recourse to any other remedy available to him in law. Application stands dismissed with the observation aforesaid. Narendra/ (Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, ACJ.)