Co Appl 39/06 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Company Application No.39/2006 Official Liquidator of M/s Kesari Vanaspati Products Versus RIICO, IDBI Mumbai, SBBJ, Jaipur, Vishya Bank, Jaipur Date of Order ::: 18/01/08 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. B.K.Sharma, for Official Liquidiator of respondent Co. Mr. Anurag Sharma, } Mr. Rajendra Sharma, } Mr. Shiv Garg } for respondents Instant application has been filed by Official Liquidator, making in all six prayers but in course of arguments, Counsel has confined only with regard to prayer No.1 & 4. Respondents are represented by their respective Counsel – none of whom disputed expenses incurred by Official Liquidator in winding up proceedings and for providing security – specific reference whereof has been made in para 2 of the application; however, jointly submit that they will make payment of expenses on pro-rata basis. As regards prayer No.1, it is otherwise innocuous. Consequently, the company application is hereby disposed of with the direction that while taking facts on record, prayer No.4 stands allowed Co Appl 39/06 //2// and the Official Liquidator may send statement of expenses incurred with regard to property in question (under provisional liquidation), to the respective secured creditors who are respondents herein; and on receipt of statement of expenses, its payment be made to the Official Liquidator within thirty days. The RIICO has also filed application which cannot be considered while disposing of application filed by O.L. However, liberty is granted to the RIICO to raise their grievance, if permitted under law. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/39Co.Appl06.doc