IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22087 of 2009 ARJUN RAJAK Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 21.8.2009 Heard. The case is under Sections 395 and 354 of the I.P.C. The allegation, besides committing dacoity, is also of misbehaving the women folk of the house of the informant. The allegation appears heightened during course of investigation so much so a new case appears introduced as if the lady had been ravished. The submission is that paragraph 45 of the case diary is the further statement of the informant in which he admits some dispute between himself and accused Gauju Mansoori on certain trifle matters on which there was a Panchayati and the informant had been asked to pay certain amount to him and to feed fad the grudge the case has been foisted. Be that as it may, considering the above facts and circumstances, let the petitioner Arjun Rajak be released on his 2 furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 6, Purnea, in Sessions Trial No. 307 of 2009. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)