1 W.P.No5578/11 UNREPORTED IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.5578 OF 2011. 1. The Director, Ground Water Survey and Development Scheme, Govt. of Maharashtra Bhujal Bhawan, Shivajinagar, Pune. 2. The Regional Dy.Director, Ground Water Survey and Development Scheme, Nasik, Div. Nasik. 3. The Executive Engineer, Rural Water Supply Scheme, Z.P., Ahmednagar. 4. The Dy.Engineer (Mechanical Div.), Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar. ... Petitioners. Versus Ganesh Bhagwan Dixit, Age 33 years, Occ.Service, R/o Warul Galli, Tq. Parner, Dist.Ahmednagar. ... Respondent. ... Mr.R.P. Phatake, Addl. Govt. Pleader for the petitioners. Mr.A.R.Joshi, advocate for the Respondent. 2 W.P.No5578/11 ... CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J. Date : 30.08.2011. ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. Heard. 2. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing. 3. The present Respondent had filed a complaint before the Labour Court, challenging the termination order issued to him. Initially the Labour Court granted statusquo on an application Exh.U-2 for interim relief. Thereafter, the said application Exh.U-2 was rejected. Aggrieved thereby, the Respondent filed Revision before the Industrial Court. The Industrial Court allowed the revision and directed that if the present Respondent is terminated, he should be reinstated. The said 3 W.P.No5578/11 order is assailed in the present Writ Petition. 4. The order of termination has taken effect. The interim orders passed to reinstate the Respondent would tantamount to a final relief. In case, the complaint of the Respondent is allowed, he would be entitled to all the benefits. As such no irreparable loss would be caused to him. At this stage, it would be too premature to arrive at conclusion on merits. 5. In view of the fact that the order of termination had already taken effect, it was inappropriate on the part of the Industrial Court to direct the reinstatement by way of interim order. In light of above, the impugned order is quashed and set aside without going into the merits of the contentions raised by the either party. 6. In view of the above, the impugned order is quashed and set aside. Rule is made absolute in above terms. The Labour Court where the complaint is pending shall decide the said 4 W.P.No5578/11 complaint within a period of three (3) months from today. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) asp/office/wp5578.11