XI-HC-22 ^€) 'S^I -t|l*ll<rl<(, 'S^FIS, fayiyy IIICIT thiicn 3n^?r ~V[SK ujf'Cf^y-to' (,30'L.^ 200% I^^CT' sn^r'qn PW* 311^1 ^^i<t> ^^ OT^T ^RiTW^ite PETITIONER nlm. JUltl, Ramesh Kulmi Kishorc Siabc workmg as Orgaaizer, Sui^uja, Verstos ^ujmar Suiha, S/o Shri Late Mangal iui^ia, Agcd about 44 ycars, Prcscntly Panchayat & Social Educatiou ^Janpad Paachayat-Surajpur, Distt. Chfiattisgarh. RESPONDENTS StateofChIis Through the Social Raipur, Shri G.R.; petitioner, presently Education Distt. Raipiul WeUfcre Chhdtti: SaUu 0|rgi Writ Petition uader Article 2; S.B / Hon'ble Shri Dhirendra MisUra. J 07.11.2008 Mr. Paukaj Shrivastava, Mr. P.K. Bhaduri, PL for the courisel The oefitioner. who is workul Organizer, has filed this petition ^ dated 5.7.2008 whereby he ha^ Panchflyat-Surajpur to Janpad Pa4' on adininistrati.ve grounds. Learued counsel for the -^t pressnig fhis petition at ttus stage,| chNF(n41Ti ^H<yil'^ l^^ <P»l'^.l< ^? 3lfiOT SD^T (.ttisgarh, Secretaiy, Deptt of Paachayat & DKS Bhawau, Mantralaya, isgarh. Aged about - Not knowu to the |/o Not kaown to the petitioner, wjorkuig as' Kanchayat & Social O^ganizer, Jaapad Panchayat-Sunga, Chliattisgarh. Softhe Constitutioa oflndia for the petitioner. $tate. .g as Pauchayat & Social Education igaiast fhe order of Anuexure P/1 been transfeiTed froin Janpad ;hayat-Magarload, Distt. Dhamtari, ititioi^er subnuts that he is not however, he niay be given liberty to 1^ -HC-22 sii^r^n h-u'b an^r WRW^lf^f ^ 'S^ •<)l<lici<), 'g^PTS, fs|djy^< llfCTI (hHiqi 3n^r ^ra^ {,^f.a^e..:...&.2:0.2-.•g^ 200^ fN^T' sii^rTOnw^Tfspr •2- cti|<lF<n<4l'^ Wraf "4 'f^E^ Tf^I^R ^3lf;tIH 311^1 fite ficsh representation against| his tBEinsfer order of Amiexure P/l bcfore thc respondent No. 1, whc| may be farfher directed to decide fh.e same within a specified period iii]accordauce with law. Mr. PK Bhadun, leamed c^unsel appeariag for fhe State submits that if fhe petitioner files fresl^ representatiou agamst his trausfer order of Aanexure P/1, fhe sam(e shall be considered aad decided by the competent aufhority pn its withia a further period of six represeD.tetion. In view of above subinissi fhe insta.nt petition is disposed detailed representation agamsl beforc the respondent No.l. Oi same shatl be considered and owu inerits, ia accdrdan.ee wil weeks frois. fhe date ofreceipt o] owu nierits m. accordance with law, 'eeks i&oin fhe date of receipt of the >ns ofleamed counsel for fhe parties, )fwifh. Uberty to the petitioner to file a his ta-ansfer order of Annexure P/1 such representation being inade, the ecided by the respondent No. 1 on its law, wifhin a furfher period of six 'fhe representation. Dtute^a^ a Judge [^^s4