In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... C.W.P. No.9998 of 2007 ..... Date of decision:26.8.2009 Gurmail Kaur .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents .... Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Bhatia, Advocate for respondents No.5 to 15, 19 and 20. Mr. Sham Lal Bhalla, Advocate for Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocate for respondent No.18. Mrs. Pooja Chopra, Advocate for respondents No.22 to 28. ..... S.S. Saron, J. Mr. J.S. Bhatia and Mrs. Pooja Chopra, Advocates appearing for the respondents submit that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous as the petitioners had sought quashing of the orders dated 31.3.2006 (Annexure-P.4), 17.8.2006 (Annexure-P.5) and 16.1.2007 (Annexure-P.7). A reference has been made to para 11 of the petition wherein it is inter alia stated that the petitioners had challenged the order of the Commissioner i.e. order dated 16.1.2007 (Annexure-P.7) by way of revision petition and they also filed an application for stay of execution proceedings pending in the Court of Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Patiala. The learned Financial Commissioner was pleased to issue notice on 24.5.2007 in ROR No.304 of 2007 for 25.7.2007 but declined to grant stay. C.W.P. No.9998 of 2007 [2] Thereafter, the executing Court had fixed the case for 7.7.2007 on which date the execution was fixed for report after taking physical possession from the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for respondents submit that the ROR has been dismissed in default by the Financial Commissioner on 21.5.2009 and no application has been filed for seeking its restoration. It is also submitted that partition proceedings have been finalized and `Sanad Takseem' prepared and possession changed. No one has been appearing for the petitioners on various dates when the case was taken up. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. August 26, 2009. (S.S. Saron) Judge *hsp* NOTE: Whether to be referred to the Reporter or not:Yes/No