HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.20017 of 2011 Date : 30-12-2011 Between: Mynoddin Elementary Teacher Training Institution, Giddalur, Prakasam District Represented by its Correspondent and Secretary Smt. S. Mehatab .. Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri D. Kasim Saheb Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 6 & 8 to 11 : Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare Counsel for respondent No.5, 7, 12 & 13 : -- The court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief : “…to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not processing and not sanctioning the Post- Metric Scholarships and Reimbursement Tuition Fee of 38 students to the petitioner institution as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Instruction No.9.13 of G.O.Ms.No.143, dt.15-7-2008 and violation of Articles 14, 16 and 30(1) of the Constitution of India, 1950, consequently direct the respondents to sanction/release the Post Metric Scholarships and Reimbursement Tuition Fee of 38 D.Ed. Course (Muslim Minority-8, SC-6, ST-5, BC-19) candidates for the academic year 2010-2011 to the petitioner institution forthwith either online method or manual method as per the Instruction No.9.13 of G.O.Ms.No.143, dated 15-7-2008…”. At the hearing, Sri D. Kasim Saheb, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly conceded that this Court, by order dated 23-11-2011 in W.P.No.8064/2011 and batch, upheld the revised policy of the Government contained in G.O.Ms.No.66, Social Welfare (SW.EDN.2) Department, dated 8-9-2010 and held that the students who were admitted in the convenor’s quota alone were eligible for grant of Post-Metric scholarships. This Court, however, in view of Memo No.1611/SW.Edn.2/2011-12, dated 3-2-2011, further directed the respondents therein to reimburse the scholarships of the students who were admitted under spot admissions prior to the Academic Year 2010-2011 and are continuing in their course of studies till completion of their courses. Since it is admitted in the Writ Petition that 38 students of D.Ed. course were not admitted in the convenor’s quota but they were admitted through spot admissions during the Academic Year 2010-2011, no relief can be granted in favour of the petitioner in respect of those 38 students. It is however made clear that the petitioner is entitled to approach the respondents for fees reimbursement in the event such reimbursement is denied in case of students who were admitted prior to the Academic Year 2010-2011 and are continuing their course of study and also those who were admitted during the Academic Year 2010-11 under convenor’s quota, if they were denied such fees reimbursement. Subject to the liberty given as above, the Writ Petition is dismissed. As a sequel, WPMP No.24258/2011 is disposed of as infructuous. _________________________ Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy Date : 30-12-2011 AM