1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.5640/2006. Smt. Kalawati @ Khubkala Versus Union of India & Anr. Date of order:- November 25, 2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Ms. Laxmi Sharma on behalf of Shri Ravi Shankar Sharma for the petitioner. Smt. M.S. Raghav for the respondents. ***** BY THE COURT:- In the present case, writ petition has been filed by widow of deceased employee, who retired from Central Public Works Department claiming benefit of family pension. Although the court has conscious of the fact that this writ petition was filed in the year 2006 and remained pending before this court for last four years, but at the same time in view of the constitutional bench judgment of Apex Court in L.Chandra Kumar Vs. Union of India & Ors. : AIR 1997 SC 1125, the remedy of the petitioner lies before the Central Administrative Tribunal Bench Jaipur itself. Learned counsel for petitioner at this stage submitted that petitioner may have difficulty in 2 approaching the Tribunal now because of limitation and therefore prayed that this matter may be transmitted to the Tribunal. Prayer so made is declined. Petitioner may directly make an application before the Tribunal with her submission regarding delay giving all these reasons so as to take advantage of Section 5 as well as Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 21 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. The learned Tribunal may in its wisdom consider those aspects independently keeping in view the fact that the writ petition has remained pending before this Court for one decade. Present writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS