W.P. No. 1366 of 2007 (S/S) With Stay App. No. Nil / 07 Hon. P.C. Pant, J. Heard Mr. Sharad Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajiv Bisht, learned counsel for the respondents. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged order dated 07.08.2007, passed by respondents No. 2, whereby the services of the petitioner are terminated, after the dismissal of writ petition filed by the petitioner earlier, which was numbered as Writ Petition No. 1714 (S/B) of 2002. The impugned order is nothing but consequence of the dismissal of the earlier writ petition wherein an interim stay order was passed and the petitioner was continuing in service under the cover of said stay order. Since, the writ petition itself has been dismissed and the termination order which was challenged in said writ petition was not set aside, as such, the impugned order passed by the authorities to terminate the services of the petitioner in consequence of the dismissal of the writ petition, suffers from no illegality. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, in limine. (Stay Application also stands dismissed). (P.C.P., J.) 21.09.2007 HN