RSA 150 of 1999. 20.4.2009 Present: Mr. Ramakant Shyarma, counsel for the appellants. Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Neeraj Gupta, counsel for the respondent. This appeal also raises verbatim the same questions of law as were raised in RSA 144 of 1999. The documents which have been relied upon either as conferring title on the defendant or purportedly entitling the appellants of ownership rights and disentitling the defendant of his right to the suit land are also exactly similar in nature in all respects. Ex. D-1 is the sale deed which has been executed by Fakir Chand in favour of the defendant. The same revenue record and evidence has been produced in this appeal which has been produced in RSA 144/1999 and considered in detail by the Courts below. For the reasons as given in RSA 144 of 1999, this appeal is also dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending application(s) shall stand dismissed. April 20, 2009 (PC) (Dev Darshan Sud), J.