In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … COCP No. 1860 of 2008 Date of decision: August 12, 2009 Makhan Singh son of Hardit Singh ..Petitioner Versus S.M.S. Rizwi and another ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr. A.K.Chopra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. N.D.Kalra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Veer Bhan Singla, Advocate for the respondents ,,, Rakesh Kumar Garg,J(Oral) Mr. Vir Bhan Singla, Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents states that the payment of the monetary benefits to the petitioner has been made and therefore, the judgment of this Court dated 30.5.2008 passed in CWP No. 10819 of 1997 stands complied with. However, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has disputed the aforesaid contention of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents and stated that all the consequential benefits flowing from reinstatement, such as promotion etc. have not been granted to the petitioner so far. Be that as it may, I am not inclined to proceed further in this contempt petition. The petitioner may represent in accordance with law to the respondents for his remaining grievances. Disposed of Rule discharged. August 12, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE