1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR C.A.W. NO. 751/11 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 827 OF 2011. Gulabrao Gangaram Aashtankar .vs. N.I.T. & others Applicant : Ashish Charandas Wasnik. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. V.G. Bhamburkar, Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. A.C. Wasnik, Advocate for applicant. CORAM : S.B. DESHMUKH, J. DATED : APRIL 8, 2011. Heard Mr. A.C. Wasnik, learned Advocate for applicant/intervenor (in person) & Mr. V.G. Bhamburkar, learned Advocate for the petitioner/respondent in Civil Application. After hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, I am inclined to allow the application. C.A. is allowed with limited scope only for recording that applicant Mr. Ashish Wasnik sought intervention. Reason is that the Counsel for the petitioner, moment the matter was called out, seeks withdrawal of the Writ Petition. This motion is opposed by the learned Counsel Mr. Wasnik. According to him, his application for intervention is pending. For the limited 2 purpose, I have allowed his application for intervention only to be recorded that such application was filed. WRIT PETITION NO. 827 OF 2011 : In this Writ Petition, order passed below Exh.131 in Regular Civil Suit No. 770/03 passed on 20.1.2011 by learned Joint Civil Judge, J.D., Nagpur is challenged. Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that I have not entered into the merits of the controversy amongst the parties, even entitlement of Mr. Wasnik to be party either as plaintiff or defendant in Regular Civil Suit No. 770/03. If such motion is made before the appropriate Court, the Court concerned shall hear the parties and pass appropriate order. JUDGE. J.