IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11893 of 2010 1. SHISHUPAL KUMAR S/O SHRI JAGDISH PRASAD R/O VILL.- MAUA, P.O.- BANKIPUR, P.S. PARWALPUR, DISTT.- NALANDA---------------petitioner Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, BAILY ROAD, PATNA-800001 2. THE SECRETARY, B.S.E.B., BAILY ROAD, PATNA-800001 3. FINANCIAL CONTROLLER, B.S.E.B., BAILY ROAD, PATNA-80001 4. GENERAL MANAGER-CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER (CENTRAL AREA ELECTRICITY BOARD), SIRPENTINE ROAD, PATNA 5. ELECTRICAL SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER ELECTRIC SUPPLY CIRCLE, KAGZI MOHALLA, AT & P.O.- BIHARSHARIF, P.S.- BIHAR, DISTT.- NALANDA 6. ACCOUNTS OFFICER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY CIRCLE, AT BIHARSHARIF, DISTT.- NALANDA-----------------------------------------------------------respondents ----------- For the petitioner : Mr.R.K.Sinha, Advocate For the respondents: M/S Vinay Kirti Singh, V.K.Verma, Advocates ----- 2. 02.8.2010 The petitioner seeks a direction for payment of his admitted dues amounting to Rs.54,634/- being 5% deduction of the security from running-on-account bill which was refundable on payment of final bill but the same has not yet been paid though the final bill has been paid in January, 2009. From the reply of the respondent No.5 to the legal notice served by the petitioner dated 25.5.2010 it is evident that the amount itself is admitted and only on account of paucity of funds the same has not yet been paid. 2 Mr.Vinay Kirti Singh, learned counsel for the respondent Board, submits that the amount has already been paid to the petitioner three days earlier. In that view of the matter, the writ application has become infructuous and it is dismissed as infructuous. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) Spal/