IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 576 OF 2008 VINAYAK PADMANABH SHINKRE (DECEASED) THROUGH LR'S AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND S.D.O. PONDA AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Edwin Furtado, Advocate for the Petitioners. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 5th March, 2009 ORAL ORDER: Heard Shri E. Furtado, learned Counsel on behalf of the petitioners. 2. At the behest of the petitioners, market value of the land acquired was enhanced to Rs. 45/- per sq. mt., in relation to Survey No. 31/1 by award dated 8/01/2008. It appears that the said award was subsequently corrected on 20/02/2008 at the behest of one Vishnudas D. Sadhale, who has a dispute pending under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act with the petitioners herein. By the said correction carried out on 20/02/2008, the learned reference Court has clarified that the enhancement granted would be subject to the outcome of references namely LAC No. 86/1998 and LAC No. 43/1996 under Section 30 of the said Land Acquisition Act. 3. Learned Counsel on behalf of the petitioners submits that the said correction could not have been carried out to the impugned award at the behest of the said Vishnudas D. Sadhale. The learned Counsel further submits that in this Writ Petition, the petitioners are not challenging the enhancement granted by the learned reference Court in favour of the petitioners, but, only that part of the award by which it was corrected. The said Vishnudas D. Sadhale is not a party to this Writ Petition. The said correction has now become part of the award of the learned reference Court dated 8/01/2008, which is otherwise an appealable award. If that is the position, this Court need not entertain this Writ Petition, which is hereby dismissed, with liberty to the petitioners to take appropriate proceedings for correction of the said award, as it now stands. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH