IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 173 of 2005 (S/B) S anjay Kumar Bhansali ...…………. Petitioner Versus Uttaranchal Sugars & others ...…………. Respondents Mr. Devesh Bishnoi, Advocate for the review applicant / petitioner. JUDGMENT Coram : Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C. J. Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J. BARIN GHOSH, C.J. (Oral) Delay Condonation Application No. 9383 of 2011 There is no objection to the application for condonation of delay, in preferring the review application. We considered the averments made in the application for condonation of delay. Being satisfied with the reason furnished therein, we condone the delay in preferring the review application. Review Application No. 670 of 2011 In the writ petition a regularization of the petitioner was sought. The writ petition was filed in 2005, which was decided by this court on 31st December 2010. In the meantime, an impleadment application was filed, where a prayer was made to implead the U.P. Co-operative Sugar 2 Factories Federation Limited, Lucknow. It was stated that people working in U.P. Co-operative Sugar Factories Federation Limited, Lucknow, were regularized w.e.f. 7th August 1995. That was the ground for impleading U.P. Co-operative Sugar Factories Federation Limited. That application was not allowed, while the writ petition was decided. In the present review application that appears to be one of the grievances. In the event, the same had been allowed there would not have been any difference in the judgment rendered on 31st December 2010, in asmuchas U.P. Co-operative Sugar Factories Limited had nothing to do with regularization of the employment of the petitioner. In the review application the petitioner is seeking to rely upon the order passed regularizing a colleague of the petitioner before 31st December 2010. The order thus passed was not within the knowledge of the petitioner, despite exercise of due diligence, has neither been pleaded nor has been established in the application for review. We, accordingly, find no merit in the application for review. The same is dismissed. (U.C. Dhyani, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 23.09.2011 Negi