IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11614 of 2005 Ramadhar Prasad Singh son of late Naresh Singh, resident of Pipra, P.O. Kakila, P.S. Jagdishpur, District Bhojpur, Arrah (Bihar)… … Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna, 2. Bihar State Housing Board, Patna through its Chairman, 3. Manager, Management and disposal of housing estates, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna, 4. Revenue Officer, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna 5. Executive Engineer, Housing Board, Public Health Division, Patna, 6. Assistant Engineer, Housing Board, Sub- Division, Arrah, 7. Managing Director, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna … .. Respondents For the Petitioner: Mr. Shashi Nath Jha, Advocate For the State:Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, AC to GA VIII --------- 3 07.12.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the Managing Director, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna as respondent no. 7 in this writ application. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It is submitted on petitioner that he has been allotted MIG situated at Dalpatpur, Ara and the value of the house was assessed at Rs. 1,49,379/-. It is contended that the petitioner has already deposited the entire amount 2 and he has been given possession of the concerned MIG house. However, the demand has been revised vide Annexures 5 and 6, which is not acceptable to the petitioner. This matter has been fixed upon the request made by learned counsel for the Bihar State Housing Board as indicated in the order dated 11.11.2011 but none appears on its behalf when the matter was called out. Learned counsel for the State submits that a Price Committee has been constituted under the order of this Court for resolving such disputes regarding price of the land, plot or house. In above view of the matter, this writ application is being disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a representation/application along with a certified copy of this order within four weeks before respondent no. 7 who would immediately forward the same to the Price Committee. The Price Committee after affording opportunity to the petitioner and other concerned party would take a decision by recording reasoned order expeditiously, preferably within eight weeks thereafter. Learned counsel for the petitioner would be at 3 liberty to raise all the points taken in this writ application before the aforesaid Price Committee including the decision of this Court in Shiv Sahay Verma v. The State of Bihar and others (2006(4) Patna Law Journal Reports, 264). SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)