In the Punjab and Haryana High Court, at Chandigarh. CRM-M- 18704 of 2011 Decided on Aug 09,2011 Rishi Pal and another --Petitioners vs. State of Haryana --Respondent AND CRM-M- 23043 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on Aug 09,2011 Satish Kumar and another --Petitioners vs. State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.R.S.Longia and Mr.Ashit Malik, Advocates, for the petitioners. Mr.Sagar Deswal,AAG,Haryana. Rakesh Kumar Jain,J:(Oral) This order shall dispose of two petitions bearing CRM-M- 18704 of 2011 (first petition) titled as Rishi Pal and another Vs. State of Haryana in which the petitioners have prayed for regular bail only on behalf of Parveen Kumar (petitioner No.2) and CRM-M-23043 of 2011 (O&M) (hereinafter referred to as the second petition) titled as Satish Kumar and another Vs. State of Haryana in which the petitioners have prayed for regular bail on behalf of both the petitioners i.e Satish Kumar and Nanha Hasan in a case registered vide FIR No. 109 dated 18.5.2011, under Sections 136 of the Indian Electricity Act, and 411 IPC, at Police CRM-M- 18704 of 2011 -2- Station Pundri, District Kaithal. Therefore, both the petitioners are being disposed of together. Allegations against the petitioners are that they were stealing the electric wires and were selling it to the kabaris. Nanha Hasan in the second petition is allegedly a kabari. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no other case pending against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioner Parveen Kumar (in the first petition) is in custody since 22.5.2011, Parveen and Satish (in the second petition) are in custody since 22.5.2011 and Nanha Hasan (in the second petition is in custody since 10.6.2011. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners but without making any observations on the merit, the present petitions are allowed and the petitioner Parveen Kumar (in the first petition), Satish Kumar and Nanha Hasan (in the second petition) are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds and heavy sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. August 09,2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge