IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12327 of 2011 Lalit Kishore Prasad SON OF LATE KRISHNA KUMAR PRASAD RESIDENT OF VAISHNAVI UMA GIRI APARTMENT, FLAT NO. 105, L.C.T. CHAT NEAR GANGA TOWER, MAINPURA, P.S. PATLIPUTRA, PATNA. Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 3 16/08/2011 Except for explanation which is being offered by the petitioner by way of a kind of defence to the chargesheet submitted upon him subsequent to the order of suspension contained in annexure-11, there is no legal infirmity by which such order of suspension dated 19.07.2011 is required to be interfered with. Since the petitioner has already offered his explanation and indicated the stand, let the respondents take a decision on the explanation within a reasonable time frame. If they are not satisfied with the stand of the petitioner or the grounds for explanation, then the consequence will flow or the issue may be allowed to rest. The impugned order, otherwise, does not require any interference by this Court. This writ application is dismissed. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) - 2 -