Crl.M.No.M 8203 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M 8203 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 18, 2010 Suraj Bhan and another .....Petitioners v. State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Parties in person with Mr.D.R.Singla, Advocate. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to respondent nos.2 to 5 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent nos.6 to 9. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., Superintendent of Police, Rohtak, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 13.3.2010, Annexure P5, already made to him by the petitioners. Petitioner no.2-Vinod was earlier married. She got divorce vide decree of divorce passed by Family Court, Bhiwani, dated 24.7.2009, and it has been averred that she contracted re-marriage with petitioner no.1 on 12.3.2010, as per marriage certificate, Annexure P3. Date of birth of petitioner no.1-Suraj Bhan, as per copy of Matriculation Examination Certificate, Annexure P2, is 5.8.1985, and age of petitioner No.2- Vinod, as per decree, Annexure P1, is 25 years as on 24.7.2009. Photographs of the marriage are Annexure P4. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2, Crl.M.No.M 8203 of 2010 (O&M) -2- i.e., Superintendent of Police, Rohtak, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 13.3.2010, Annexure P5, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioners. 18.3.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge