IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA THURSDAY, THE 6TH MARCH 2008 / 16TH PHALGUNA 1929 Mat.Appeal.No. 510 of 2007() ---------------------------- OP.285/2006 of FAMILY COURT, KASARAGOD .................... APPELANT/RESPONDENT ------------------------------- ABDUL RAUF, S/O.ABDUL KAREEM, RESIDING AT ABDULLA MANZIL, NEAR AILA MAIDAN, P.O. UPPALA, KASARAGODE TALUK, UPPALA VILLAGE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT: APPELLANT ---------------------- FOUSIYA, D/O.ABDUL KADER, RESIDING AT MISSION COMPOUND, THALIPPADUPPU, KUDLU VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHAN SRI.S.SOMAN THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.B. Koshy & K. Hema, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mat.Appeal No. 510 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 6th day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT Koshy, J. The Family Court by the impugned judgment dissolved the marriage of the appellant with the respondent. This appeal was filed with an application to condone the delay of 170 days. Even though the delay was condoned, it is submitted that the appellant himself remarried. The contention of the appellant is that he has not been served any notice in the original petition. Since the appellant married another woman after the dissolution of the marriage, we are of the view that interference of the judgment will only prolong the matter resulting in harassment of the respondent. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. J.B. Koshy, Judge K. Hema, Judge. mn.