IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 1219 of 2005 Dharam Dutt Semwal ….…... Petitioner Versus Managing Director, Uttaranchal Pey Jal Nigam, Dehradun and others ………. Respondents Mr. J.P. Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Date of Judgment: 14.12.2010 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J. BARIN GHOSH, C.J. (ORAL) The relieving order dated 31st May 2005, by which the petitioner was relieved for joining the State of Uttar Pradesh, was under challenge in the writ petition, in so far as the same related to the petitioner. With the writ petition, a stay application was filed, which was disposed of on 25th August 2005 by directing that the petitioner shall not be relieved for the State of Uttar Pradesh till a final order is passed on the representation of the petitioner dated 10th June 2005. Since then, as submitted before us, the learned counsel for the petitioner has not received any instructions from the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner has lost interest in the matter. 2. We, accordingly, revoke the power granted in favour of the learned counsel for the petitioner and dismiss the writ petition for non- prosecution. Amit (Nirmal Yadav, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 14.12.2010 14.12.2010