WP(C) 2866/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. BK Purkayastha, learned counsel for the petitioners. The grievance of the petitioners in the present petition is that though they are entitled to the compensation including the Zirat in respect of the land acquire d by the Collector, Cachar, Silchar, the same has not been paid despite the dire ctions issued in the order dated 13th September, 2010 passed in WP(C) No.5044/20 10. It appears that the petitioner earlier approached this Court by way of a writ pe tition being WP(C) No.5044/2010 claiming the same relief. A single Bench of thi s Court vide order dated 13th September, 2010 disposed of the said writ petition directing the respondent Nos.2 and 3 therein to take appropriate steps for rele asing the compensation in respect of the land of the petitioners provided there is no dispute with regard to the assessment of compensation including Zirat. A further direction was issued to consider the case of the petitioners as to wheth er the case of the petitioners’ falls within the category mentioned in the repor t of the Director dated 19th December, 2009. The said exercise was directed to b e co mpleted within a period of 3 (three) months from the date of receipt of a c ertified copy of the order. According to the petitioners, despite submission of the certified copy of the or der alongwith the copy of the writ petition as directed by this Court by the afo resaid order, nothing has been done by the respondent authorities. That being the position, the second writ petition claiming the same relief is no t maintainable. The earlier order of this Court, if has been willfully and/or deliberately viola ted by the authority to whom the direction was issued, it is open to the petitio ners to approach this Court in appropriate jurisdiction.