ssp 1 CAM 35 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.35 OF 2011 REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO.29161 OF 2010 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.8 OF 2005 Ranjana Vinod Kejriwal .....Applicant versus Vinod Babulal Kejriwal (Since deceased) through his legal representative Mr.Omprakash Changoiwal ..... Respondent Smt.B.P.Jakhade, for the applicant. Mr.Prasad Dani a/w Mr.Kamlesh Kharade, Ms.Puria D’Costa i/by India Law Alliance, for the respondent. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & RANJIT MORE, JJ. DATE: 07th MARCH, 2011. P.C. : 1. Learned counsel for the applicant frankly states that there is no point involved in the review, but she has filed this review petition only at the insistence of her client. It is required to be noted that as per the original order of this Court, applicant has already withdrawn Rs. 15,00,000/- and this review petition is filed only on the ground that real income of the respondent was suppressed. The Family Court Appeal was dismissed by this Court, confirming the order passed by the Trial Court that the marriage of the applicant with the respondent is not proved. Once the applicant having withdrawn the amount of Rs.15,00,000/-, has ssp 2 CAM 35 of 2011 no right whatsoever to file review petition and whether respondent has suppressed real income or not, is absolutely irrelevant question. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also pointed out this aspect to her client, but her client insisted to file review petition. Since there is absolutely no substance in the review petition and it is filed after a considerable time after withdrawing the amount of Rs.15,00,000/- by the applicant, the above Civil application as well as Review Petition are dismissed. ( RANJIT MORE, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )