1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3042 OF 2009. (Ravi Devidatta Khurana .v. Dr. Mukesh Govindram Sukhija) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri Amol Mardikar, Advocate for the applicant. Shri P.V. Navlani, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. 25TH JANUARY, 2010. Heard. This application is directed against the order dated 22.07.2009 below Exh.63 allowing the application to mark exhibit on document Article-A. Shri Amol Mardikar, the learned Counsel for the applicant submits that Pws-1 and 2 did not depose about the contents of the document and that is why the document could not have been exhibited. Shri P.V. Navlani, the learned Counsel for the respondent argued that the impugned order is well justified and whatever has been deposed is a matter of record and, therefore, no interference is required at this stage. Having heard the learned Counsel for the rival parties and having seen the evidence of Pws-1 and 2 pointed out to me by Shri Amol Mardikar, the learned Counsel for the applicant, I feel that the document (Article-A) can be said to have been proved and, therefore, the trial Court did not err in marking the exhibit number to the said document. 2 All submissions are kept open in the trial. Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE *rrg.