IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.misc. No.4252 of 2011 DUBAR MUKHIYA, SON OF PARAO MUKHIYA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-PURSHOTTAMPUR, P.S.-NAUHATTA, DISTRICT- SAHARSA. ………PETITIONER. VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR …..……OPPOSITE PARTY. WITH CR.MISC. NO.2112 OF 2011 DILIP SADA @ DILIP SADA (MUKHIYA), SON OF BASUDEO SADA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-DUMRA, POLICE STATION- NAUHATTA, DISTRICT-SAHARSA. ………PETITIONER. VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR …..……OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 2 19.02.2011 Perused the record. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 25(1-B)A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act. There was allegation of assault against Naresh Kumar Verma on 14.11.2008 for which a substantive case was lodged against Naresh Kumar Verma and Ashok Kumar Verma. In the F.I.R. it was allged that from Naresh Kumar Verma villagers snatched the country made gun, but for the said occurrence, it is shocking that after two years, on the direction of the S.P., the present case has been lodged against the persons who snatched the gun from the assailant. The pleading of the petitioner appears to be convincing that in order to 2 save the main accused this frivolous case has been lodged. Under the criminal procedure code there was no occasion for lodging a separate case, rather if the materials came anybody could had been made accused in the earlier case. Let the matter be verified by the I.G. of the Saharsa range. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Saharsa in connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case no.63 of 2010. PN ( Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)