IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M- 31290of 2010 Decided on:- 18.07.2011 Mukesh Diwedi ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.S.Bedi Present: Mr.J.S.Dadwal , Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana. **** M.M.S.Bedi, J(Oral) The petitioner had filed an application for bail which came up for hearing on 26.10.2010. Subsequently, the petitioner was enlarged on bail on 11.12.2010 by the trial Court. The said fact was informed to this Court on 13.1.2011. A perusal of the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gurgaon dated 11.12.2010 indicates that the bail had been granted to the petitioner after the prosecutrix and her husband turned hostile. I have gone through the report of the District and Sessions Judge and taking into consideration the circumstances of the case, since the bail has been granted on the ground of prosecutrix having been turned hostile, it does not appear to be a serious affair as to under what circumstances, he had filed an application before this Court. The matter is dropped and the petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (M.M.S.Bedi) 18.07.2011 Judge mamta