Crl. Misc. No. M- 7655 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 7655 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: March 25, 2010 Paramjit Kaur and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Shalini Atri, DAG, Haryana. GURDEV SINGH, J. Heard. The petitioners have come up with this petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, for issuance of direction to respondents No. 2 and 3, Superintendent of Police, Yamunanagar and SHO, Police Station City, Yamunanagar, to protect their life and liberty from the hands of respondent No.4, who is their son. They moved an application dated 5.3.2010 before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Yamunanagar, to provide adequate security to them on the ground that they are apprehending threats to their life and liberty at the hands of said respondent No.4. Learned State counsel has filed reply, which is signed by the DSP, Jagadhri, in which it has been stated that the petitioners left the house situated in Yamunanagar, after moving the application and when the police was sent to that house for providing necessary protection, they were not Crl. Misc. No. M- 7655 of 2010 2 found present there. The petitioners are present in Court and on being asked as to when they left the Yamunanagar, they disclosed that they left that place on 25.2.2010. Thus, they moved the application before the SSP after coming from that place. When such is the position, no such direction can be issued to respondents No. 2 and 3 to provide such protection to the life and liberty of the petitioners as, as per their own disclosure made in the Court, they are presently residing in Chandigarh. No such direction can be given to the police of Yamunanagar at this stage, for which the petitioners have to approach the SSP, Chandigarh. The petition is disposed of with the said observations. March 25, 2010 (GURDEV SINGH ) prem JUDGE