-<5 lc3-Z SINGLE BENCH BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^,3^ /2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS .\^^^;- '...-•',W-' iit)--' .<h. s. ^)'-"'/^:^ Q^ rf<-,."' ,^' ,\>-- V ^~" •^ Nimial Kujur (D.Ed.), aged about 45 years, son of Shri Benjamin Kujur, working as - Asst. Teacher, Govt Middle School - Aamapali, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) VERSUS ^ . 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 2. The District Education Officer, Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) 3. The Block Education Officer, Education Block, - Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDJA, ^" HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRFT PETITION (S) No. 635 of2010 PETITIONER : Niraial Kujur. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofCfahattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETmON UiNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTI'ITmON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satfsh K. Aanlhotri, J. Present: Shri A.N.Bhakta, Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy G.A. forthe State/respondents. OJRALORDER ' (Passed on 11 day of Febraary, 2010) With consent, leamed counsel for the parties were heard tmally 1. By fhis petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to pay two advance mcrements irom the date ofpassing ofD.Ed examination, on his own expenses, during his service period. 2. Shri Bhakta, leamed counsel appearing for tlie petitioner submits that the issue involved ia the present case is no longer res integra as the same has been considered and decided by this Court in the matter of Tashwant Kumar Bharadwaj v. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another^ and Gopesh Kumar Verma v. The State Govt. qfChhattisgarh and anothei^ . 3. Shri Bhakta further submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the-decision as aforestated. Thus, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to decide his case in the light of aforestated decision, subject to verification ofthe fact asto whetiier the petitioner has acquired D.Ed certificate on his own expenses duringthe course ofhis service. tfiSBai 4. Leamed eounsel appeai-ing for the State/respondents submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law and in the light ofthe decision ofthis Court in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj and Gopesh Kumar Verma (supra), within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 5. In view of foregoing, according to the leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge