^$^ SJNSIE BENCH IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONERS \^] >^f. ^%/ -^^' ^y *** v-f.'>\ > y W.P.IStNO. ^S^Li<^ /2010 1. Rajeev Kumar Gupta, S/o Shri Devnarayan Gupta, aged about 45 years, working as Head Master, T.W.D., Govt. Primary School, Ratiya, Block- Jashpur, Distt- Jashpur (C.G.) 2. Smt Sanjita Jha, W/o Shri Kishor Kumar Jha, aged about 38 years, workuig as Head Master, T.W.D., Govt. Priiuary School, Bakitoli, Block-Jashpur, Distt- Jashpur (C.G.) 3.' Girdhari Ram Yadav S/o Shri Jayo Kumar Yadav, aged about 40 years, Working as Head Master, T.W.D. Girls Primary School, Lodam, Block- Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 4. Seinfuliyani Kujur , D/o Samual Kujur, aged about 41 years, working as Head Master, T.W.D, Gyan Jyoti Primary School Sarudih, Block-Jashpur, Disfa~ict Jashpur (C.G.) 5. RESPONDENTS \ ~^.=^—^ ^^, ^ <'"..! ,' t^.Y ^J^' I- %-v^ -<^/ \ .i^ Pradeep Kumar Xalxo, S/o Abraham Xalxo, aged about 41 years, workuig as Head Master, T.W.D., Govt. Prunary School Tukutoli, Block- Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS l." State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) r^ Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, Distt.- Jashpur (C.G.) 3 Block Education OfScer, Block - Jashpur Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 4 Treasury Officer, Treasury Account & Pension Jashpur, Distt.-Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ? r ^^ ^-! S.J ^ s^ •<<i<4ici<<, ®tTly'i(o,f^ciiy^'!, ..lA)..i>.6J..-^..,.%4.^di0 sn^i'^i'fgaw ^wsn^wgnw "< ?ITR?? ( ^CTW^fetai^s SB : Hon'ble ShiTRianindra fnot 21-07-2010 Shri Somkant Verma, coun WrfwiN'qitRTf-if fezt Tfe^R ^sifin an^i ad 5»nnvasiaya,_>i. .el for the petitioner. Ms. Sangeeta Mis'nra, Pan^i Lawyer for the State/respondems. i-1eard. Learned counsei appearijig for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are entitled to benefit of two advance increments on account of .A. --, ^J.!;*; thev having oassed B.T.i. examiikation before their appointment at their ovvn cost. It is submitted that the issu^ res integra and the same has b^ Court in the case of Asha Saxenls vs. State ofM.P. & Grs.. 2009 iW) MPJR fSCi 59. It is further submitted that invoiveu in the present petition is no ionger en flnatiy deciued uy ttie Hon bie Supreme :his Court has aiso taken a similar view in its order dated 06-02-2009 passe^ in W.P.(S) No.S257 of 2008. Leamed counsei for the petitionere furthe^ draws attention of this Court to order dated 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appetii No.124 of 2008, wherein relying upon the judgment ofthe Supreme Court n the case of Asha Saxena (supra) and the order passed by this Court in ^nother Writ Appeai No.87/2009, directions have been issued for consider^tion of the case for gr-ant of two advance jncrements as per circutar date< Pradesh. after verification ofthe Learned counsei for th petitioner would aiso be considei 21-09-1974 issued by the State or Madhya Facts pieaded in the petition. 3 respondents subrnits that case of the ed on the same iines. u.. Lj^i.iLditjc^-uvaifuca. # L ^-r r7 "'Sl-HC—78 75T ^W\^, ®fl)y<l<o,fsfCIWy •\ A^Ko.36^r/ sn^?i 'q^Ri' (13pig^r) sn^i ^iT Inw ^ansir^ignw wnwdfta sii$?r 3- in view of the statement off with a direction to the respoi clairn of the oetitioners for gran uated 21-09-1974 issued bythe the facts pleaded in the petition v |Tiade above, this petition is finaliy dlsposed ilident authorities to consider and deciue the of tw/o advance increments as per cireuiai- gtate of Madhva Pradesh, afEer verification of jf'ithin a period of eight weeks from today. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^H[CT<ftl tTW^ff "^ fSTSt if^i^K ^i'aiRnsn^i vi. ut/i.K-ciit/cTTtwayaeaT: <