/ Pranesh Dubey S/o Late Shri J.P.Dubey, aged 50 years., S/o Inspector, posted at” P.H.Q., Mahasamund (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh,‘ Through the Secretaiy (Home), D.K. S. Bhavvan, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE ‘ ' a CONsTITUTION OF INDIA HI$H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single 3emh: Hun'ble Shri 5mish K. Agriiha’fri, J. W. P. (S) No. 1067 0f 2007 Pe'ri'fioner Prgnesh Dubey Versus Respondenf S‘m’te of Chha‘i’fisgar‘h Through /.,. ‘i’he Secre‘mry (Home) Presen‘h Mr. Anoop Majumdur, counsei for fhe pefi'i'ioner‘. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panef Lawyer for fhe S‘mfe/ respanderri: ORDER (Passed an 26*“ Day of February, 2007) 1. Leoned counsel appearing for The pe'rifioner submi‘i’s 'i'ho'i' fhe Hon‘ble Supreme Courf in fne case of Pmkash 5ingh and ofhers Vs. I UHioo of India and ofher‘s {(2096) 8 5CC 1} has directed The Cenfml Govemmenf, Sfufe Governmenfs or Union Terrifor'ies, as ‘H'Ie case may be, 1’0 impiemenf fhe direction on or before 31-12-2006. In View of The said decision, fhe pe‘fi'i'ioner seeke permissior‘i of fhis Courf f0 make a defaii represenfo'i'ion before The appropriafe aufhori'ry for paseing The opproprio're order in accordance wi'rh low. 2. If is ordered accordingiy. K5d 3. The respondenfs are directed To consider The represenm'i'ion of “the pei’ifionel‘ in +he ligh‘l’ of ‘fhe judgmen‘t of The Hon‘ble Supreme Cour? in The case of Pmkash Singh and afhers Vs. Union of Iridia and ofhers (Supra) within a period of four weeks from 'i'he dafe of receipt of fhe represenmhon, if any. 4. Thus, ‘i'his wri'i' pefi'fion is dismissed as wifhdmwn wi'l'h 'l'he above direc‘rion. No order as +0 costs. / ’ Subhash