: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.194 OF 2009 Rani Dattatraya Rasal ... Applicant V/s. Dattatraya Nathuram Rasal ... Respondent Mr.Rajesh More for Applicant Mr.Pankaj Deokar for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: MARCH 12, 2010 P.C.: 1. The miscellaneous civil application has been filed for transferring the proceedings which are pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Baramati to the Family Court, Pune. 2. The applicant and the respondent were married on 3.4.2002. They have one daughter who was born on 20.4.2003. The applicant contends that she was being harassed for dowry by the respondent and the members of his family. She contends that she was driven out of the matrimonial home alongwith her daughter in April 2004. She has also stated that proceedings u/s 125 of the Cr.P.C. filed by her are pending in the Family Court, Pune. The respondent has filed a petition for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act u/s 13(1)(i)(a) and (i)(b) of the Act pending before the C.J.S.D., Baramati. : 2 : 3. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Although the application is opposed by the learned advocate for the respondent, in my opinion, it must be allowed. 4. The applicant has made out a case for transferring the proceedings in Baramati to the Family Court, Pune for the reasons stated in the application. Accordingly, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b).