THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Civil Revision Petition Nos.5101 & 5102 of 2010 Date:11.03.2011 Between: Vishwa Hindu Parishad Srikakulam Branch ..... Petitioner AND Srikakulam Educational Trust, rep.by its Secretary, and another .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K.S.Murthy Counsel for Respondents: --- The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: The petitioner, who is third party to O.S.No.5 of 2010 in the Court of the learned Distinct Judge, Srikakulam, is the petitioner in I.A.Nos.2143 and 2144 of 2010 filed for leave to file an application to set aside the ex parte decree in the said suit and for annulling the said ex parte decree. Its grievance in these two civil revision petitions is that I.A.No.2143 of 2010 filed for leave is being adjourned from time to time by the learned District Judge, Srikakulam. The petitioner, therefore, sought for appropriate directions to the learned District Judge to dispose of the above two I.As. In order to verify the true state of affairs, this Court has called for the docket proceedings, a perusal of which, would show that I.A.No.2143 of 2010 was adjourned from time to time from 02.09.2010. As many as 28 adjournments were given by the learned District Judge out of which, barring two or three occasions, on all other days the case was adjourned at the request of the learned counsel for the respondent-decree holder. Going by any standard, the number of adjournments given by the learned District Judge shows undue lenience extended to the decree holder and it is needless to observe that such adjournments lend strong support to the criticism levelled against the long delays occurring in disposal of the cases. From the perusal of the docket proceedings, I have no doubt in my mind that these adjournments are absolutely unwarranted which cause frustration to the litigants. The learned District Judge shall therefore exhibit proper urgency in disposal of the cases and circumspection in granting adjournments. The learned District Judge is accordingly directed to dispose of the above-mentioned two I.As., within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if not already done, and report to this Court. Subject to the above, the civil revision petitions are disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the civil revision petitions, C.R.P.M.P.Nos.6781 and 6782 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 11th March, 2011 Note: Registry shall communicate a copy of this order to the learned District Judge, Srikakulam as early as possible. (b/o) VGB