1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2521/2003 (M/s Rajendra Paper Mart & 2 ors. Vs. Prakashchandra Tarachand Parekh & ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. Mr. M.B. Naidu, Adv. for the petitioners. Mr. A. Shelat, Adv. for respondents. CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATED : 5 th DECEMBER, 2008. C.A. NOS. 6155/06 & 6156/06 It would not be necessary to consider the effect of the proposed amendments which are incorporated in the civil applications filed by the petitioners, as a clear finding of fact had been recorded by the authorities that the respondents required the entire house comprising of four tasmas for their bona fide occupation. Even otherwise, in case the respondents fail to occupy the suit premises after seeking permission under Clause 13(3) (vi) of the C.P. & Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949, the remedies are always open to the petitioners-tenants. Both the civil applications are, therefore, dismissed and disposed of. JUDGE RMP