IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 19TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 31962 of 2009(M) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- SOUDAMINI, W/O. BHAVADAS, AGED 54 YEARS, CHATHAMKULAM HOUSE, KONGAD, PALAKKAD. BY ADVS. MR.BINOY VASUDEVAN, SMT.P.G.BABITHA. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. PUDUPARIYARAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PUDUPARIYARAM PO, PALAKKAD 678 733. 2. THE SECRETARY, PUDUPARIYARAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PUDUPARIYARAM PO, PALAKKAD 678 733. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/11/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.31962 of 2009-M = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 10th day of November, 2009. JUDGMENT Notice to the respondents is dispensed with preserving their right to seek re-hearing of this writ petition, if aggrieved by the directions being issued hereunder. The petitioner is aggrieved by the action taken by the Grama Panchayat in refusing an application for building permit on the ground that the land in relation to which permit was sought is one which is shown as wet land in the revenue records. The parties have to stand guided by the decision of this Court in Shahanaz Shukkor v. Chelannur Grama Panchayat, 200(3) KLT 899. Not only that, the petitioner has also obtained an order under the KLU Order at the relevant time, it is stated. WPC31962/09 -: 2 :- For the aforesaid reasons, the impugned order is quashed and the Panchayat is directed to reconsider the matter in the light of what is stated above. The writ petition ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/2411