..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.85 OF 2007 Shri. Narendra Chandrakant Gaikwad ..Petitioner. Versus Versus Versus 1.Shrenik Ashok Mangave, & 2.The State of Maharashtra. ...Respondents. .... Ms.Shraddha Y. Mohite, Adv. for the Petitioner. Mr.Shrikant Chaugule, Adv. for Respondent No.1. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 26th April, 2007. DATED : 26th April, 2007. DATED : 26th April, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner-orig.accused, the learned Advocate for respondent No.1-orig.complainant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner had been convicted under Section 138 of N.I.Act. During pendency of this Revision, the parties have arrived at settlement and consent terms to that effect have been tendered. The said consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. 3. Revision Application is disposed of in terms of consent terms. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)