IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.21119 of 2006 Between: Sri Venkataramana Talkies Manubolu Village, Manubolu Mandal, Nellore District, rep., by its Partner, Chereddy Padmanabha Reddy. … Petitioner And The Joint Collector, Nellore, Nellore District & another. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri M. Venkatanarayana Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Home This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21119 of 2006 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in considering and disposing of the applications of the petitioner dated 08.09.2006 and 06.09.2006 respectively duly renewing and recalling the impugned order of the 2nd respondent dated 02.09.2006 in Reg.2772/06, as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and in violation of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and Rule 12(A)(a) of the A.P. Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1970 and consequently direct the respondents to renew the B-Form licence of the petitioner cinema talkies from 01.01.2004 to 31.12.2007 on collecting the necessary fees as provided for under Rule 12(A)(a) of A.P. Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1970.” At the hearing, Sri M. Venkatanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no further orders are required in this writ petition. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.26779 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 19.06.2009 ES