CWP No. 5274 of 2010. 24.2.2011 Present: Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.M. Bisht, Dy. A.G. for the respondents. Mr. R.M. Bisht, learned Dy. Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 19th February, 2011. It is quite apparent that the services of the petitioner are required at Paprola. Mr. Dilip Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to the fact that on medical ground petitioner’s request for accommodation in and around Shimla was earlier acceded to by the State. He submits that let the Government reconsider the matter afresh on the basis of medical health. Accordingly, petition is disposed of with a direction that respondent No.1 shall consider the petitioner’s case in the light of the recommendations made by the Medical Board and the other attending circumstances as pointed out in the present Writ Petition. It is, however, clarified that the decision taken by the Secretary shall be adhered to by the parties as agreed upon by the learned counsel. The decision be taken positively within a period of two weeks. Needless to add, if required, adequate opportunity of hearing/representation shall be afforded to the petitioner. With these aforesaid observations the present petition is disposed of. Copy Dasti. ( Sanjay Karol) Judge Feburary 24th, 2011 (jai)