THE HON'BLE SRI BILAL NAZKI, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL No.1718 of 2005 Date: 19-09-2005 Between: M.Mogili …Appellant And Government of Andhra Pradesh rep. by Its Principal Secretary and others …Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI BILAL NAZKI, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL No.1718 of 2005 J U D G M E N T (Per the Hon’ble Sri Bilal Nazki, ACJ) Heard learned counsel for the parties. The writ petitioner/appellant is aggrieved of inaction of respondent Nos.1 and 2 who according to him had not considered his complaints about the constructions being made by respondent No.3. The writ petitioner had filed a suit against respondent No.3 and obtained temporary injunction against him. If the writ petitioner was aggrieved of inaction on the part of respondent Nos.1 and 2, he should have made them parties in the same suit. The suit is pending from the year 2001. In these circumstances, we do not think that there is any ground to intervene in the matter and the learned Single Judge was right in dismissing the writ petition. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. _____________________ (Bilal Nazki, ACJ) 19th September, 2005 ___________________ (R.Subhash Reddy,J) vrn