IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40887 of 2008 UMESH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 15.12.2008 Heard. The petitioner is not named in the FIR which has been registered under Sections 302/120B/34 IPC containing the names of six persons who were suspected to have committed the murder of the son of the informant and had earlier threatened to do away with his life. In most part of the investigation, the petitioner’s name could not be implicated. However, five witnesses who are closely related to the accused persons came forward and made statements giving up the names of six persons already named in the FIR and implicated the petitioner and some persons as accused who had committed the offence. Contention is that it is an after thought. It was further contended that the witnesses who implicated the petitioner had introduced a new story that when they reached near the darwaja of Debu Yaedav, they saw mob there and Mahesh Yadav lying dead. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, namely, Umesh Yadav be released from custody on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand)with two sureties of - 2 - the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Nima Chandpura P.S.Case No.42/2008. SKBOSE (Dharnidhar Jha)