IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40591 of 2009 1.DEVENDRA JHA son of Kashinath Jha 2.BINAY JHA son of Kashinath Jha 3.SURYKALA DEVI w/o Kashinath Jha 4.NEELAM DEVI w/o Devendra Jha 5.ANITA DEVI w/o Binay Jha All resident of Village Barehwa, P.S. Runnisaidpur, Distt. Sitamarhi ----Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.12.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a police case for the alleged offences registered under section 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners no.1 and 2 are Bhaisurs, petitioner no.3 is the mother- in-law and petitioners no.4 and 5 are Gotani of the informant. It is submitted that there is no specific allegations against these petitioner attracting the above offences. The learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that specific allegation of overt act is on the part of petitioner no.1 Devendra Jha as he sprinkled kerosene oil on the informant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioners no.2 to 5 above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No.221 of 2009 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. So far as prayer for anticipatory bail made on behalf of petitioner no.1 Devendra Jha is concerned, I am not inclined to enlarge him on bail. This application on his behalf is, accordingly, rejected. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.) PNM