THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1157 OF 2009 ORDER: This criminal revision petition under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioner – de facto complainant against the orders dated 25.03.2009 passed in Crl.M.P.No.104 of 2009 in S.C.No.285 of 2006 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Tanuku, wherein the learned Sessions Judge dismissed the petition filed under Section 311 of Cr.P.C. for issue summons to Sub-Inspector of Police, II Town Police Station, Kakinada to give evidence and for marking certain documents. 2. Heard. 3. The grievance of the petitioner-complainant is that certain documents, which would go to show that the accused is involved in two more cases and a rowdy sheet is also opened against him, which are sought to be marked, are not allowed to be summoned. Learned counsel for the respondent contends that if the said documents are necessary, the complainant ought to have taken steps initially. Further more, without summoning the documents also, the relevant material could have been elicited through the Investigating Officer. 4. There is no justification in staying the proceedings at the stage, which in fact would not be in the interest of the complainant herself. Hence, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. However, the marking of the required documents can be done while examining the Investigating Officer, if the Investigating Officer is not yet examined. ___________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. 13th April 2010, Rns.