Crl. Misc. No. M-25154 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-25154 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 17s, 2010 Tarsem Singh @ Seema and another ........Petitioners Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent ******* CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Anurag Arora, Advocate for Mr. Deepinder Brar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. SABINA, J. Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.60 dated 2.11.2009, under Sections 302,341,323,325,506,148,149,120-B of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Mehal Kalan, District Barnala. The alleged occurrence had taken place on 31.10.2009 at about 7.15 p.m. Binda Singh gave a dang blow on the person of Harjit Singh, Kanta gave a dang blow on the left leg of Harjit Singh, Hansa gave a dang blow on the left leg of Harjit Singh whereas Sewak Singh gave a blow with the help of wooden part of kahi on the leg of Harjit Singh. Budh Singh came forward to save Harjit Singh. At that instance petitoner gave a blow with a dang on the left wrist of Budh Singh. Mohni gave a blow with the help of wooden part of kahi on the left hip of Budh Singh. Soma gave a dang blow on the right leg of Budh Singh. Crl. Misc. No. M-25154 of 2010 (O&M) 2 Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners had not inflicted any injury on the person of Harjit Singh but had allegedly inflicted the injuries on the person of Budh Singh. The injuries have been declared simple in nature. Petitioners are in custody since November, 2009. Learned State counsel, on the other hand, has opposed the petition. Keeping in view that fact that the petitioners have not given any injury on the person of the deceased Harjit Singh but are alleged to have given simple injuries on the person of Budh Singh and the fact that the petitioners are in custody since November, 2009, it would be just and expedient to release the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed. Petitioners be admitted to bail subject to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Barnala. (SABINA) September 17, 2010 JUDGE Anand