THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9309 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents in not regularizing the services of the petitioner is bad, arbitrary, illegal, unjust, unreasonable consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization/appointment on the regular time scale of the conductor as the termination of the petitioner is against to the principles of natural justice and against to the Corporation circulars by treating re-engagement of the petitioner by reviewing authority/Respondent No.1 through his proceedings, dt.18.05.2009 as with continuity of service with all consequential service benefits.” When the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned standing counsel for the respondent-Corporation that the subject matter of this writ petition is covered in view of the order dated 12.04.2010 passed by this Court in W.P.No.8090 of 2010. In that view of the matter, following the aforesaid order of this Court, this writ petition is disposed of, by declaring that the petitioner is entitled for continuity of service and to all the benefits of contract employment, which are extended to the similarly placed contract employees. Accordingly, the order of the appellate authority to the extent of treating the petitioner’s reinstatement as a fresh engagement, stands quashed. It is also made clear that if there is any misconduct on the part of the petitioner, this order will not preclude the respondents from conducting inquiry and passing appropriate orders. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 23rd APRIL, 2010. kvni