IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.678 of 2009 CHITRANJAN @ NIRANJAN son of Jawahar Sao, resident of East Unta, P.S.- Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad. . . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through Director General of Police, Bihar. 2. Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad. 3. Officer-in-charge, Jehanabad Police Station. 4. Officer-in-charge, Makhdumpur Police Station. . . . . . Respondents. ----------- 2/ 23.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In the instant application, the petitioner prays for proper investigation of Makhdumpur P.S. case no. 308 of 2008. Learned counsel submits that subsequently petitioner has also been remanded in Jehanabad P.S. case no. 395 of 2008 without any proper material. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner has earlier been made an accused in Jehanabad P.S. case no. 21 of 2009 under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. The grievance of the petitioner is that he had been made an accused in Jehanabad P.S. case no. 21 of 2009 and subsequently, he has been remanded in two other cases namely Makhdumpur P.S. case no. 308 of 2008 under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Jehanabad P.S. case no. 395 of 2008 under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner prays that the cases may be properly investigated. In case, the petitioner files a detailed representation before the Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad, he may examine his representation and if the Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad - 2 - finds materials, he may issue necessary directions. With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)