C^2?^7 /^~ G JNJHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (S) N0. S^ ^% / 2009 ^' ^ ^\ff>J"" !i"A>"" ^^ ^/ '"v-y 1N THE MATTER OF ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ; AND IN THE MATTER OF CHHATTISGARH CIVIL SERVICES (CLASSIFICATION, CONTROL AND APPEAL) RULES, 1966; AND BETWEEN : PETITIONER ^Yogendra Kumar Dongre, son of Shri Shiv Lal Dongre, aged about3^y,eaLS, presently posted as Shift Manager, Tn-(?harge Assistant Milk Commissioner, Dairy Laboratory, Directorate of Animal Husbandry, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Department of Animal Husbandry (Dairy Services), Mantralaya D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Commissioner-cum-Director, Directorate of Animal Husbandry and Dairy, Raipur, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS ANDFOR^ISSUANC^PFOTHERSUITABLEWRITS,DIRECTIONOR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS ••1^. ^ ^.,. h'3 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGJS^H AT BILASPUR SB : HON'BLB SHRI *JUSTICB PRITINKER DIWAKBR W.P.fS) N0. 5028/2009 PETITIONBR \ Yogendra Kumar Dongre Versus RESPONDBNTS i StafceofC.G.SsAnother WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri Amrito Das, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Praveen Das; G.A. for the State. ORAL ORDBR (04.09.2009) With the consent of leamed counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. Contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that the departmental enquiry is pending since 3.8. 1999 and on account of the pending enquiry the petitioner is nofc only suffering humiliation but his legal rights are also being affected adversely. He contends that the authorities are not passing any order in the enquiry because in the enquiry report there is nothing against the petitioner. Counsel for the State contends that if the petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the departmental enquiry, direction may be issued for deciding the same expeditiously. Without further commentmg on merits, the present petitioher is disposed of at this stage with a^direction to the respondents to conclude the enquiry and pass necessary order within a period of sbs: months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It is expected from the petitioner that he will cooperate in the completion of the enquiry. Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge u^