IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.24522 of 2008 Between: Gowramma W/o. Narasimhappa Namidipalli Village, Somandepalli Mandal, Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Collector, Anantapur. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Penukonda, Anantapur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not passing Interim orders in suspension petition in appeal i.e., Rc.No.(E2)/3150/08 dated 7.5.2008 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st respondent to pass interim orders in appeal ﬁled by the petitioner i.e., Rc.No.(E2)/3150/08 Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KUNCHEAMMAHESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.24522 of 2008 ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for issuance of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the ﬁrst respondent in not granting interim orders on the Interlocutory Application ﬁled for suspension of the order in appeal i.e., Rc.No.(E2)/3150/08 dated 07.05.2008 as illegal and arbitrary. The grievance of the petitioner is that while entertaining the revision petition ﬁled by her, no orders were passed by the Joint Collector, Anantapur-the ﬁrst respondent herein on the Interlocutory Application ﬁled by the petitioner seeking stay of the orders of the second respondent-Revenue Divisional Oﬃcer, Penukonda, Anantapur District, and because of non-granting of interim orders, the revision petition would become infructuous and no purpose would be served even if the revision petition is taken on file and heard subsequently. However, at the time of hearing, learned counsel for both the parties agreed that a direction may be issued to the ﬁrst respondent to dispose of the revision expeditiously. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the ﬁrst respondent-Joint Collector, Anantapur to dispose of the main revision petition itself ﬁled by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible. Till such time, the order passed by the second respondent- Revenue Divisional Oﬃcer, Penukonda on 05.03.2008, is stayed. N.V. RAMANA, J Date: 10.11.2008 va/pnb