IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12377 of 2011 Binay Krishna Gupta ,son of late Doman Sao, resident of Mohalla- Mahalpur,P.S. bihar,Post-Biharsharif, District-Nalanda. ……… petitioner. Versus 1.The State of Bihar through the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Saran Region, Chapra(Bihar). 2. The Director General of Police(Old Secretariate),Patna. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Chapra(Bihar). 4. The Superintendent of Police Administration. 5. The Accountant General, Bihar, Birhand Patel Marg, Patna. ………… Respondent. ---------------------------------- 2 04.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the State. It appears from the pleadings that the petitioner is aggrieved by non grant of ACP, which, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, is legally due to him. He submits that after superannuation in the year, 2004, he represented before the authority but no order has been passed. He submits that nothing has been done in this regard and if he is found entitled to any relief, the same cannot be denied only because he has not approached this Court earlier. After hearing the counsels for the parties, this Court feel that for ends of justice, let the respondent no.1 i.e., the DIG, Saran, Chapra consider the grievance of the petitioner as raised in the writ petition and pass appropriate orders within a maximum period of four months from the receipt/production of a copy of this order along with a copy of writ petition. The petitioner may file additional documents/papers in support of his case. It is expected that the concerned respondent shall also look into the matter on its own merits and without 2 being prejudiced by the fact that it is being raised after a long delay. If anything is found payable to the petitioner, the same should be paid to him within two months thereafter. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed off. sudha ( Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)