1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10924 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2120 OF 2001 Dhananjay Bhalchandra Joshi, Age 32 years,Ococup. Nil, R/o Gokulwadi, Aurangpura, Aurangabad. ... APPLICANT. VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra, and another. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.S.P.Deshmukh,Advocate for Applicant. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 14TH OCTOBER,2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Mr. Deshmukh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant-Petitioner submits that on account of the income and benefits received by the deceased Bhalchandra Joshi, in whose place the petitioner is claiming appointment on 2 compassionate ground can not be denied. 3. Mr. Deshmukh, learned counsel in support of his submissions placed reliance on the judgment in the matter of Balbir Kaur and Another Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd and others reported in 2000(6) Supreme Court Cases 493. 4. We have perused the Judgment and order dated 4th July, 2002, passed by Division Bench (Coram: R.M.Lodha and A.B.Naik, JJ.) and the judgment cited before us. The Civil Application for Review was filed on 01.08.2002. We are not convinced with the grounds raised in the application for review. The grounds raised in the application for review are not sufficient to exercise our Review Jurisdiction. The Civil Application is dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- [K.K. TATED, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] MTK 3