HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR C.R.P. No.2145 of 2009 Dated 15.04. 2011 Between: Manikonda Venkata Subbamma. …Petitioner. And: Manikonda Venkata Subbamma. …Respondent. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR C.R.P. No.2145 of 2009 ORDER: Petitioner who is a third party to the suit sought his impleadment on the ground that he is actually owner and possessor of the suit schedule property and the plaintiff’s suit for injunction is filed against the defendants is nothing to do with the said schedule property. The Court below rejected the said implead petition on the ground that the petitioner cannot force the plaintiff to fight a litigation against her. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Undoubtedly, the suit in question is one for permanent injunction filed by the 1st respondent herein against the respondents 2 to 5. When the 1strespondent himself does not seek for relief against the petitioner and is opposing impleadment of the petitioner, he being dominus litus, I am unable to see how the petitioner can force the 1st respondent plaintiff to fight against her. Moreover, petitioner being not a party to the suit will not in any way be affected by the disposal of the suit. As such, I see no error warranting correction by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _____________________________________ JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR Dated 15.4. 2011 Dvs HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR C.R.P. No.2145 of 2009 Dated 15.04. 2011