1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO.3312 OF 1992 WRIT PETITION NO.3312 OF 1992 WRIT PETITION NO.3312 OF 1992 Gopal Ramchandra Mane : Petitioner versus Gangubai Siddhappa Haladkeri and others : Respondents. WITH WITH WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3325 OF 1992 WRIT PETITION NO.3325 OF 1992 WRIT PETITION NO.3325 OF 1992 Gopal Ramchandra Mane : Petitioner versus Prakash Vyankatesh Pai & ors. : Respondents. Mr.Prabhanjan Gujar h/f Mr.V.A.Thorat for the petitioner. Mrs.Deshpande h/f Mr.N.P.Deshpande for Respondents. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE, J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE, J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : September 21, 2006. DATED : September 21, 2006. DATED : September 21, 2006. 2 2 2 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Both these matters were adjourned by me on three occasions. Advocate for the respondents Mr.Nitin Deshpande, as per the instructions from instructing advocate, states that the matters are settled between the parties. Sufficient time was given to the advocate for the petitioner in both the matters to take instructions. Till today he has no instructions and he is not in a position to contradict advocate Mr.Nitin Deshpande. In view of this, the petitions are dismissed. Rule in both the matters is discharged. Interim stay, if any, in both the matters, stands vacated. Liberty to the petitioner to apply for restoration if his instructions are otherwise. [D.G.DESHPANDE, J.] [D.G.DESHPANDE, J.] [D.G.DESHPANDE, J.]