^ \ ^-^ ^fiLE lESfCH IN THE HIGH COURT OP JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 'l^^ ,^,. W.P.I^.) N0. ' ' / 2010 PETITIONER: x^^t y VK^-> <''•"^ RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. Gopal Rain Chandra S/o Late Shri Jagat Ram Chandra, Aged about 64 years, Occupation : Retired from the post of Block Education Officer at Jaijaipi-u- R/o Village Datoud, Post Kotetara, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipiu- (C.G.) 2. Director, , F'ublic Instruction, Directorate Chhattisgarh Rgdpur 3.^ The Joint Director Treasuiy Accoiuits 85 Pension BUaspur Division, District Bilapsur (C.G.) 4. The District Education Officer, Janjgir, District Janjgu--Chainpa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA£QR_ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF'' LIKE NATURE ETC. -'"'uLc^gectfully b^s to a*^ ''''''••^•^^/-^.•:s^s?!^y^^^^^^s?^'s^^^^i.:^x »sa HiGH COURT OF CHHATnSOARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETmON /S) No. 1 120 af2010 PETmONER RESPONDENTS Gopal Ram Chandra. VER8US State ofCMiattisgarh & Ofliers. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTETUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Safeh K. Asrfhofal, J. Present: Shri Rajesh Kumar Shanna, Advoeate for the petitionw. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondents. ORALORDER CPassed on 17tb day of March, 2010) I. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner was issued show-cause- notices dated 16.01.20W (Annexure P/l), 30.06.2009 (Annexure P/2) and 27.11.2009 (Annexure P/3) for recovery rf Ifae alleged excess payment made to flie petitioner during the course of his service. Shri Sharma submits that the petitioner has replied to the above show cause notices and the petitioner apprehends (hat an order ofreeovery may be passed at anytime. 2. No order can be passed on mere q>prel nsi<m ofthe petitioner. Siace there is no diallenge to any specifie order, as no order has been passed by the respondent autiiorities after filing oftfae reply to the show cause notices, this petition cannot be eutertained at fhis stage as this petition is premature. . ,, .-,:,,•:,.,,.,..,-,,.:.:..:: „.., ! 3. Consequently, the writ petitioii, being premature, is dismissed at the motion stage itself. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amffi