IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18081 of 2009 UPENDRA SAH Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 03.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner though is husband and alleged for demand and torture due to its non-fulfillment, having illicit relation with his sister-in- law (bhabhi) and then killing by all the family members but no charge-sheet has been submitted for the offence under Section 304B, rather 302 of I.P.C. Further, it is said that four of the co-accused persons have been allowed bail by a Bench of this Court, certified copy of the order passed in Cr. Misc. No. 38090 of 2008 is annexed herewith to corroborate bail to others but in the order itself, it is given that they were separated from the husband, while the petitioner is husband all responsibilities vest upon him. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)