(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 887 OF 2011 Rohidas s/o. Savitra Dhatrak, Age : 52 years, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Ghargaon, Taluka : Sangamner, District : Ahmednagar, .. Petitioners and 6 others. (Original defendants) versus Nitin s/o. Sambhaji Bhagwat, Age : 30 years, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Ghargaon, Taluka : Sangamner, .. Respondent District : Ahmednagar. (Original plaintiff) ....................... Mr. A.N. Nagargoje, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. V.Y. Bhide, Advocate, for the respondent. ........................ CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 15TH MARCH 2011 (2) COURT'S ORDER : 1. Heard Adv. Mr. A.N. Nagargoje, for the petitioners, and Adv. Mr. V.Y. Bhide, for the respondent. 2. The petitioners have challenged the order dated 19-10-2010, passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sangamner, below Exhibit 123 in Regular Civil Suit No. 424/2002. 3. According to Adv. Mr. Nagargoje, reasons given by the trial court for rejecting the prayers are not correct. 4. Adv. Mr. Bhide points out that objection raised to those questions has not been filed before this Court. He states that both questions are leading. 5. The petitioner / defendant is putting questions reproduced at Exhibit "F" (page 44 of the petition) to his own witness. The questions are leading and hence the same could not have been allowed. In fact, the trial court has not allowed the petitioner to put those questions. Hence, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. (3) 6. However, the petitioner is free to re-phrase those questions and seek necessary answers. 7. With that liberty to the petitioner, the petition is disposed of. No costs. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/887wp