'"•s? '®-S7 .^&s^ ^wSS^S- tol: ln< IN THE HON'BLE HIGHCOURT O^CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S» No. '2,°)1 '^ /2009 PETITIONER : '/ Mohd. Isarile S/o Abdul Gaffar,&Ali Aged about 42 years, Assistant Teacher, Primary School Jhara, Ramchandrapur, Distt.- Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State'of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Schedule Caste/Schedule Tribes Development Department, Mantrayalay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. Collector (Tribal Development) Surguja, Ambikpur (C.G.) 3. Coraraissioner, Schedule Caste/Schedule Tribes Development Deptt., Raipur (C.G.) 4. District Education Officer Ramanujganj, Dsitt.-Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA y\ IS- ^sf '<<Ni<n'Li, ®nl'M<i<o,fq<ni+iy,< ....^£..I^.....^.IA1^....^ WS! VI K-fKi ¥;SiWT'fffttiSIT^I SB_: HON'BLE SHRI JU8TICE | 29.07.2009 Shri Bhupendra Singh, Shri Yashwant Singh c^unsel for the petitioner. Thaftur, Dy. A.G. for the State. pasfced Challenge in the 30.06.2009 (Annexure P/1) pasf the petidoner who is working from Primary School, Jhara, district Ramanujganj to the Surajpur. Contention of counsel foit No.4 being a District Education| to transfer the petitioner fron^ further contends that in his has joined on 18.8.2008 and been shifted again. Lastly he Headmaster is being rnaintairj petitioner cannot be transferred^ Contention of counsel fo| inake a representation to the res decided in accordance with law. Counsel for the petitionj However he subnrits that tilll petitioner may be given some Accordingly, the petition petitioner to make a the date of receipt of the decided by the authorities from the date of its receipt. TU1 pnjitect representapon ^TTqf^H '^S3^ ^ ^S^ <f^i^.!< SJTINKBR DIWAKER- presejnt petition is to the order dated by the respondent No.4 by which fes Headmaster has been transferred [Block Ramchandrapaur, Bkiucation jption of Distrid: Education Officer, the petitioner is that the respondent Officer of Ramanujganj has no right his district to another district. He pijesent place of posting the petitioner thus in less than ten months he has contends that the seniority of the intairled district wise and therefore the the State is that fct tbe petitioner pondent No.4 and the same would be ^r agrees to inake a representation. his representation is deoidied, the jitective order. |is disposed of with a direction te the within a period of ten days from of this order, the same wouid be copy conc|smed within a period of three weeks |;hen the impugned order shall not be given effect to. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge