IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN Present HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6234 of 2009 Between: Smt. Ommi Kanaka Mahalakshmi & 5 others .. Petitioners AND M/s. Sri Varaha Lakshmi Narasimha Swamivari Devasthanam, Simhachalam, Rep. by its Executive Officer, Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam .. Respondents The Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6234 of 2009 ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed against the order, dated 11.11.2009, in I.A.No.781 of 2009 in O.S.No.1487 of 2009, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, whereunder and whereby, after perusing the documents filed by the petitioners, the respondents were directed to maintain status quo. 2. Heard both sides. 3. O.S.No.1487 of 2009 is filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, for equitable relief of injunction to retrain the respondent Devasthanam from interfering with the peaceful possession, use, occupation and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by plaintiffs which is a residential thatched house bearing D.No.25-77 (new) 7-90 (old) in an extent of 242 square yards, situated at Sanjay Gandhi Colony, Chinagadili Mandalam, a slum area of Adivivaram Village and also to prevent the illegal and highhanded actions of the staff of the respondent Devasthanam. The petitioners/plaintiffs have filed I.A.No.781 of 2009 in the above suit for grant of ad-interim injunction against the respondent, its men and agents from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of plaintiffs in respect of the plaint schedule property. Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. At the stage of admission, the status quo order was granted by the trial Court till 21.01.2010. 4. In the present revision, on 24.12.2009, this Court directed the respondent Devasthanam not to alter the nature of the suit schedule property and not to cause any damage to the property in question, pending further orders, and on 26.11.2010, while admitting the revision, this Court ordered the interim direction to be continued. 5. Unless the right, title and interest over the plaint schedule property is determined, the question of construction of any building or house by either parties to the suit does not arise. Admittedly, the respondents have not filed the counter in the trial Court. However, in view of the documents filed by the petitioners, property has to be preserved till the rights of parties are adjudicated. The application filed by the petitioners has to be disposed of by the trial Court after the filing of the counter by respondents in trial Court in accordance with law. Till then, the status quo order passed by the trial Court shall continue. Therefore, the Court below rightly ordered to maintain status quo and there are no grounds to interfere with the impugned order. 6. With the above observation, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ K.C.BHANU, J Date: 8th March, 2011 KL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6234 of 2009 Date: 8th March, 2011 KL