IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19775 of 2011 1. AJEET YADAV @ MALLU YADAV @ AJEET KUMAR son of Mahendra Yadav. 2. Pappu Yadav @ Pappu Kumar son of Mitu Yadav Both resident of village Sindhabar, P.S. Neemchak Bathani District- Gaya. ..Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 27.06.2011 Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Binod Kumar, learned A.P.P. for the State. It is submitted that offence under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act is not made out against the petitioners but it is a case of assault. The father of petitioner no. 1 has also filed Neemchak Bathani P.S. Case No. 46 of 2010 against the informant and others. Learned A.P.P. for the State could not controvert the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner while opposing the prayer. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the abovenamed petitioners are directed to surrender before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya within a period of four weeks and pray for bail. In that event, the petitioners will be enlarged on bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.7000/-(Seven thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the said Court in connection with Neemchak Bathan P. S. Case No. 45 of 2010, under Sections 341, 323, 379, 504/34 I.P.C. and 3(x) of S.C./S.T. Act with condition that they will not indulge themselves in similar or other offence and will co- operate with the Investigating Officer, failing which their bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Magistrate. kanchan (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)