AB 629/2011 BEFORE HON\BLE MR JUSTICE B D AGARWAL Heard Mr. DP Chaliha, learned senior counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K Munir, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This application under section 438 of the Cr.P.C. has been filed by accused peti tioners namely, Tarun Mudi, Durga Mudi @ Durga Charan Mudi, Renu Mudi @ Smti Nan dini mudi, Bijoy Mudi and Prem Lama seeking pre-arrest bail apprehending their a rrest in connection with Chungajan Police Station Case No. 03 of 2011 under s ections 366(A)/109/511/34 of the Indian Penal Code. From the FIR, it appears to me that the petitioner No.2, namely, Durga Mudi @ Du rga Charan Mudi has kidnapped the informant’s daughter, Chandni Devi and till da te, the victim girl has not yet been recovered by the I.O. Accordingly, the bail prayer of petitioner No.2, namely, Durga Mudi @ Durga Cha ran Mudi is hereby rejected. The other petitioners are parents and other relati ves of the prime accused. They are on interim bail granted on 07.03.2011. Accord ingly, the interim bail granted to petitioner Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5 is hereby made absolute. However, liberty is given to the petitioner No.2 to file fresh application after production of the victim girl and her statement under section 164 of the Cr.P.C . is recorded and the victim is medically examined. With the aforesaid observations, this anticipatory bail application stands dispo sed of.