IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2160 of 2010 Dewanti Devi @ Daolanti Devi & Anr. Versus Jagar Nath Singh & Anr. ----------- For the petitioners : Mr. Arun Kumar Rai, Advocate. For respondent no.2 : Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Advocate. ----------- 03/ 17.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. This petition has been filed by the petitioners for restoration of M.A.No.98 of 2004 which was dismissed for default against respondent no.1-opposite party no.1 for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 20.09.2007 by which two weeks time was allowed to learned counsel for the appellants to take steps for fresh service of notice upon respondent no.1 with correct present address. Although learned counsel for opposite parties vehemently opposes the contentions of learned counsel for the petitioners, but from the averments made by learned counsel for the petitioners and the statements made in the petition it appears that genuine reasons have been shown which prevented the petitioners from complying the said order within time. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and Miscellaneous Appeal No.98 of 2004 is restored to its original file and number. However, this order will be subject to compliance of the said order within one week. Sunil (S. N. Hussain, J.)