FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7001 OF 2011 "Kashinath s/o. Sayanna Palepwad Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. P.V. Jadhavar,Advocate for petitioner. Mr. V.H. Dighe, AGP for respondent No.s CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 28TH SEPTEMBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent. . Notice was issued to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 since it was noticed that though the petitioner has filed an application long back, the same was not considered. 2] Taking into consideration the statement made in the affidavit that both the respondents have taken charge recently, we do not propose to proceed against the said respondents. Notices issued to said respondents are, therefore, discharged. 3] The petitioner has basically challenged the inaction on the part of the respondent No.2 in not issuing the caste certificate to the petitioner. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7001 OF 2011 "Kashinath s/o. Sayanna Palepwad Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 4] The claim of the petitioner's real brother of belonging to Mannerwarlu Tribe has already been validated by the Scrutiny Committee. IN that view of the matter, we find that the petitioner is atleast entitled to a caste certificate. 5] Rule is, therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clause (C). the same shall be done within 8 days from today. [M.T. JOSHI,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-