WIQv/f $mg§§ ganch 1N THE Hig‘i COWLOF CHHAWMH ”915% Wzs) No. wz? w / PETITIGNER : UQ/a shanker Verma‘ 5/0 Law Shri Krishna Kumar Verma, aged abou? 55 years, Occupamn— Service as Assistam Grade—I. presently posted at Governmem‘ P5. Decree Coflega, Korba, District¢ Karba. (m) VEk5U$ /, (1) sm‘fe of Chhaftisgarh, Through Secremry, Higher Education Depérfmenf, 0&5. BhGWan, Manfmiay, Raipur, District- Raipur, (CG) f.” (2) Join? Secretary, Higher Educafion Department D.K.$. Bhawan, Man’rmlay‘ Rqipur, Disfricf~ Raipur, (C.G.). '/ (3) rincipa}, Government P.6. Degree Clege, Korba, Dis‘rricf- Korba, al (C.G.) 44. 3U?» HgbAT" A$;}L.Q_?wa I %ow- . 349M Cauéaf H93844’—‘Ié- 9) ' o INDIA Rk P ON U/A 226 OF T CO X WWWW Wm . .).. é%. 1:1 2007 mam W (Wt?) WWW mmwiwm $aimm 3.8: HON’BLE JwSTiCE MR PRETENKEg‘E §W£AKER 17-07-2099: Mr. Awadh Tripathil ceu 1sei for the petitioner. Mr. Y.S. Thakur; Dy. Advocate Genarai for te State/responderlts No‘ Chaiienge in the instant writ petition is to the arder deter} 30.6.2009 (Annexure 13—1) passed by ihe respondent No.2 by which the petitioner who is working on the post of Assistant Grade i has been transferred from Govt. P.G. Cotiege, Korba to Govt. Giris’ Cotiege, Korba. y the same order the respondent No. 4 has been transferred .om Govt. Giris Coiiege. Korba to Govt. PG. Coitege. Korba. Counsel for the petiti er submits that the petitioner has been transferred on the aile ed administrative ground whereas respondent No. 4 is coming ii his piece on his own request and I this itsetf shows that order' ugned has been issued gust to accommodate the responds t No. 4. He further submtts that eartier on 13.10.2008 (Annex re-P—2) simiiar exercise was done where the petitioner and t respondent No. 4 were mutualty / shifted. He sub‘nnits that eartie transfer order was issued because: there was some oompiatnt against the respondent No. 4. According to the petitioner’s ounset present is e ease/where at h o x i p h Wm m zoo mm (Wu) mmw ammawn'aa‘ mnf‘gam Wmwiwm -1” $3ifan3né¥1 ihe cost of respondent Ne. 4i the petitianer is being shifted from {me place to another. Caunse! far the Stats submits that merety because respondent No. 4 has been transferred on his own request it does not mean that the order impugned is bad. After hearing counsei far the parties; thie Court is of the view that there is no iliegali‘y in the impugned transfer order dated 30.62009 The petitioner has been shifted at Korbe itseit from one ooiiege to another and therefore; the petition being without substance is dismissed at the motion stage it/setf/ k ‘V / edit t; K V wx’r'mW‘ sg¢ge 9N“ i a\’~e‘ /