IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29445 of 2008 PANCHU MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 5.8.2008 Heard. The petitioner is named in the FIR on account of being implicated by a Chaukidar as amongst the criminals who were preparing bombs which exploded killing one of them. It is true that the petitioner was neither caught at the spot nor there was any injury to him and that the investigation against the petitioner was kept pending while winding up the same against other accused persons. The rejection order passed by the learned Judge also does not lead to any definite conclusion. Similarly situated accused has been granted bail by Annexure-2. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in Sitamarhi Sadar P.S.Case no.92 of 2001. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )