IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5651 OF 2009 Between: C. Vijaya Kumar ..... PETITIONER AND V. Krishna Murthy ....RESPONDENT The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5651 OF 2009 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel. 2. This Court ordered notice before admission on 26.11.2009 and in C.R.P.MP.No.7738 of 2009, interim stay was granted on condition of deposit of half of the decretal amount within a period of four weeks. 3. It is stated that the conditional order had been complied with. 4. The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order, dated 16.11.2009, in E.P.No.88 of 2006 in O.S.No.72 of 2002, on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Nandikotkur. 5. The petitioner/judgment debtor is an advocate. Respondent/decree holder filed the said E.P. under Order XXI Rules 37 and 38 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying for arrest of judgment debtor. The learned Judge having formulating the points for consideration at paragraph No.5, appreciated the evidence of PW.1 and DW.1, recorded reasons in detail by answering the points at paragraph Nos.6 to 9 and ultimately allowed the E.P. 6. In the light of the findings recorded and also the decisions, which had been referred to, this Court is of the considered opinion that there is no illegality in making the said order. The means of the judgment debtor cannot be doubted in any manner whatsoever. But, however, since it is stated that the conditional order had been complied with, the petitioner/judgment debtor is hereby granted eight (8) weeks time to discharge the rest of the decretal amount. 7. Subject to the above observation, the Civil Revision Petition shall stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ P.S. NARAYANA, J May 31, 2010 MD