^ -^ BEFOBE HOH'BLE M.P.STATE SDMNISTRATIVE TRIBCTNAIi BENCH AT RAIPUB (M.P.) t^ff'(')) 3^ 93/^ Original Applicatioa Ifo. /2000 Applicaat Smt. ftlanja Stirivastava Iffidow of Late R.N.Shrivastava (Paacbayat avaa Samaj Sewak Sbanghathak) Arang, District Raipur (M.P.) Versus 1. State of M.P. through secretary, Panchayat and Samaj Sewa Departmeat, Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal* 2. Director, Panchayat atid Samaj Sewa Department, Bhopal (H.P.) 3. Deputy Director Panchayat and Samaj sewa Department, Baifur (M.P.) «.. Non-Ap@licants APPLIC&TION CTKDER SECTION 19 OF ADMINISTRATIVE TSIBUN&L ACT 1985. ^. "^:.?' '^ 1. PARTICUIAR OF THE APPLICANTs As above. 2. PARTICUTLAR OF THE HON-APPLICAHTS; As aboveo 3. PARTICUIAR OF THE ORDER AGAINST WHIOI PETITION IS FII^D; Order Ho.Est-b/6/78/5643, Bhopal dated 19-08-1978, passed by Shri P.C.Sen, Director, Panchayat and Samaj sewa. ^K/iyOR^e^o, A-^. -HC-22 ^sf ^)|<4ld4, Brtltl'is. (°lcll'ai< .TI^?T 'v^s WtR'tTaillch 'OJ" "^ 200 lc<*<a" sn^iqii. K;-fi.+ s^y aTqwaTea sn^i ^giw ^rfs^ Shri S.S. Rajpzit, counsel {^ir the petitioner. Shri Arviad Dubev, Paael|La\wer for respondents No. 1 3/ State flled otl bv the widow of deceased- account of iaactiou ou fhe part. of penalty of disiuissal of the This petition has been Govemiaent einployee aggrieved of the respondeats ia not decipiilg appeal/repreStntation filed against tlie order of imposition deceased-einployee. No retura has been filed sd lu niy opinion, it woiud be| petition is fiaaIEv disoosed of wf Autliority to decide the appeal/iep) Accordiagly, it is directed Secretary, Deparanent of Paach^yai CKhattisgarh) shall decide fhe apj.jeal; decided, withia a reasonable fhe date of receipt of copy of this| riecessan" records available with Authoi-ity and aiay also contuiuation of tlie appeal earlier ^led c^^t^1T1 Hfldf'^f^^ <^1<-ri.l< ^T sipgir 3ii^i iu fhe interest ofjustice tliat fhis ':th a direction to fhe Appellate ~esentatioa. that the AppeUate Authority fnow ^yat & Social WeUare,. State of a.pj.jeal/ representation, if not already not exceeding 3 inonths froin lorder. Petitioner shafl subinit all |ier for penisal of the Coiapetent su]iinit representatiou/ appeal ia ? -h^ ^•t'K!-.! '"•^ ^-^^s^t^^^is^'s^a^t'st^^ais^^ il^"' ..•. "'^z. '/"^ '\ ., <8S@^ | -y "--. ^'y I-HC-22 's^ •^WW-t, •s-Awi's. fa^iyy 3'iT^T TR^ W(R'(Tsh11°h "W1, 200 (cj'biyT' an^r^ii h-U'h SfSs shw* 'gffg Sinha 311^1 ?TOIWHf??[ u The petition is accordiagy »bl^id<il-ltIFMf 4 'feiZt <F>t(^l'l ^aiptwsn^r fiaallv disDosed of, Petitioner would be at tiyerti- to approach fhe Court if fh( grievauce is not redressed. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge Blllil m ^ ^l^S-^MSssSi^M•S-S s~^ss3^s^&B^^^^^g^^ .n^