•Wl -7' HIGHCOURT OFCHHATTISGAKH.BILASPUR W.P.JS1 No. 6001 of 2007 PETITIONER RBSPONDENTS 3. Jhaadu Lal Choudhaiy, S/o Goviadram. Ghoudhary, aged about 58 years, Qccupatkin - Assistaat Teaeher, R/o ViBage - Lukapara, Post Saraipalt, District Mahasaiaund (C.G.) Versus State ofClLhattisgarh, Througll the Secretaiy, Department of Scliool Education, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur(C.G.) District Education Officer, Mahasamund, District Mahasainund (C.G.) Block Education Oficer, Block - Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Slui P.S. Khare, Couasel for the petitioner. Shri A.S. Kachliwaha, Govt Advocate fer the State on advaace copy. ORALORDBR (09.10.2007) SUNIL KUMARSINHA. J Heard. Leamed counsel for fhe petitioner subinits fhat fhe issue involved in fhe case is as to whether fhe petitioner is entifled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of icutial appoiatment or frQni the date ofconipletiou ofprobation period. He subinits that the issue involved herein was Gonsidered by the Madhya Pradesh State Adinmistrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No.2745/89 (MadIiiikaatYadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. and others), whereia, it was held that the SiEnilady situated teachers are entifled to regular pay seale w.e.f. fhe date of iaiti.al appointm.ent. The inatter was taJken up to fhe Hon'ble Supreine Court ia Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.6892/93. The said peti.tion was dismissed by fhe HonTale Supreme Court upholdia^ Shyna W.P.(S) No.6001 of2007 ^ the decision df ffae Tribiuial to fhe effect that fhe TeacIiers/Assistant Teacliers are entitled to regular payscale Iroin fhe date ofinitial appointment. Learued counsel for the petitioner further subinits fhat this-Court,wtule coasidering fhe sajne issue in Ram Kuinar Sahu aiid ofhers Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh aud aaofher (W,P.(S) No.813 of 2007) by oider dated 12.2.2007, has graated regularpay scalew.e.f fhe date ofiuitialappointment. Learaed cbirasel for fhe pafties joiafly subinits that this case is squarely covered by fhe decision ofthis Court ul the case ofRam Kuruar Sahu and another (supra). In yiew offhat, fhis petitioii is aUowed iu the saine terms. However, this order shall be subject to all verifications made by the State regardiag facts pleaded ia fhe petition. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge