2 ca10866.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10866 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 494 OF 2010 (Keshav s/o. Bhikaji Narode Vs. Karbhari s/o. Narayan Narode) Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 29.06.2011 Mr. A.G. Dalal, Advocate for the applicant. 1. Despite notice, the respondent is absent. 2. Heard. Perused the application. Perused the findings recorded by the Trial Court. The case of the applicant/appellant as the defendant in the Lower Court is more probable prima facie. The learned Judge of the Trial Court held that the respondent/plaintiff could not prove his exclusive possession. So following order is passed :- i) There shall be stay to the 2 ca10866.10 effect of the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned District Judge dated 21.04.2010. 3. The Civil Application stands disposed of. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] snk/2011/JUN11/ca10866.10