c .s \.o L^ ^ (1) IN THE H!GH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRiTPETITION (St N0. $'/2-/2&se-&7 PETITIONERS^^y ^^.••.y,^ ^':?;^--;'..--"" c^-''' -*0*1 1''...--^-""' ^\ <-x^^-" ^y ^'-' RESPONDENTS ^ Smt. Najma Raheem W/o Shri S. A. Raheem Age about 43 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Station Maroda No.2 Bhilai, Block- Durg, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) VERSUS .0 (o ^^° 'y \;<^ <s- ^- \^ ^ ^^ ^' 1. StateofChhattisgarh Through:- Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Direcfor, Directorate of Public Instruction, Pensionbada, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Education Office, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE S26 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Petitioners most humbly submit as under:- ^. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLEBENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. Petitioner WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.512 OF 2007 Smt. Najma Raheem versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others PetitiQner Resoondents WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.513 OF 2007 Smt. Suchte Singh versus State ®fChhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. S.K.Thomas, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Satish Gupta, Deputy Govemment Advocale for the State/respondents. ORDER dh (Passed on 25'" Day of January, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petitions are squarely covered by the declsion of this Court in the case of Sushil Tmari and tfthers vs. State Govemment af ChhaWsgarh and others (Writ Petition (S.) No.5976 of 2006), dated 7-11-2006. 2. For the aforementioned reasms, the writ petifions are allowed in terms of the decision of this Court in the maffler of Sushil Tiwari and others vs. State Govemmwit of ChhatSsgarh aml othere (Supra). No order as to coste. 3. A copy of this order be ptaced on the record of the connected writ petition. —— _ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gopal