IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4761 of 2010 MD. ANSAR ALAM @ ANSAR ALAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 10.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. While taking cognizance it is pious duty of the Court to prevent abuse of privilege given to helpless lady. In the case, complainant’s marriage was not arrange one rather relation of petitioner with the complainant created a circumstance forcing her to marry the petitioner. Dowry was not material at all. Soon thereafter there was some development and a complaint case was filed on behalf of complainant in which this petitioner was allowed bail only on transfer of six decimals of land through registered deed. Complainant comes from a poor family but demand is shown making of a Motorcycle, Rs. 25,000/- and five Bhars gold is also not appearing believable. It is for the trial court to initiate for filing of a case for false prosecution if is so found taking care of the assistance of legal brain is also behind allegation but in any case, rejection of anticipatory bail never can be justified. Thus, having regard to the facts and 2 circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj, in Complaint Case No. 1379© of 2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)