IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38877 of 2009 1. GANESHI MAHTO 2. SANJU DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 04/12/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners, who are husband and wife respectively, apprehend arrest in a police case under Section-366A of I.P.C. The submission from the statement under Section-164 Cr.P.C. is that the alleged victim was herself a married woman who went and was recovered from the house of co-accused Suresh Rai who himself has been acquitted in Sessions Trial No.252/2008. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Bathnaha P.S. Case No.22/08, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)