IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION N0. 2006 fe?;r;:.^ ;-%^^^S iiyig ososi PETITIONER ..-•l"?- ..•^<--'" v^y> JJ^/^"^ 0 Arf% / \' '7.--"^('3y ../. xi^y' RESPONDENTS ^^ ^0' \. -' Jitendra Kumar Rathore, S/o Shri R. L.Rathore, aged about 48 years, posted as S. D. O. (Rural Engineering Services), Lormi, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Department of Panchayat & Rural Development, Mantralaya Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Chief Engineer, Rural Engineering Services Development Commissioner Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Executive Engineers, Rural Engineering Services Development, Lormi, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarb)' L. K. Ladia, Asstt. Engineer In the Office of Chief Englneer, Hasdeo Kachhar, W. R. D. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE^ONITITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI. AAANDAMUS. PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS: \3l^ XI-HC-78 3^'sfpn?pr, wrfly'ic, i°i<ii«y NIHf(TS»»*llch W[ 200 3iT^?r Tgq? (<^3^ET) sn^rwf^mqi c^IT3H^?Tsh*)]cti s^iTWHfsa'sn^T 14-7-2006 W.P.Nos.1000/2006, 968/< 974/2006, 1034/2006, ll73/200|6, 2929/2006. Petitioners by Shri P. Advocates with Kum. Sunita Jain, Rajesh Jain, Smt. Yashita Moseeh) Manoj Paranjpe, Advocates. 5hri Rcyeev Shrivastava, No.971/2006. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, W.P.No.lOCX)/2006. Shri Vinay Pandey, counsel No.1000/2006. Stote/respondents by Shr| with Shri V.V.5. Murthy <& Shri |S|.! Shri Sumesh B<yaj, ffovernment Ad Shri R.P. Mandol, Department; Shri N.S. Bhadorij/o Department; 5hri M.L. Haldkar, Rur'ol Er^ineering Services; Shri PM6SY, Circle: Raipur <& Office4 Executive Er^ineer, Water< Secr4t<ary CEt> Resouitces present in Court. »ni<<Fci<fl-itii*if]Tffte(:&<Ri<^it ^isri^iTsn^r 006, 970/2006, 971/2006, 973/2006, >, 1182/2006, 1241/2006, 1242/2006 & Diw<ikar & Shri Manindr-o Shrivastava, Senior $hri Afroz Khan, Shri Anup Mazumdar, Shri on behalf of Smt. Hamido Siddique, Shri counsel for respondent No.4 in W.P. c^unsel for respondents No.12, 18 & 30 in for respondents No.13, 32 & 42 in W.P. P.K. Verma, Additional Advocate Seneral ,K. Beriwal, Deputy Advocate Generals and mcate. ', Panchayat & Rural Devetopment i, Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources 3, C&RR&A; 5hri S.K. Supta, Chief Engineer, 3.N. Shrivasta/a, Superintending Engineer, •in-Charge, and Shri Subodh Shrivastova, Departtnents & Officer-in-Char'ge <re P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3^ •<(I<IK'I<<, (iiTfl^'ie, Ridi'My \^^ *ii*i<»ti sh^ncs W^ 200 3n^?Tt|a«h(l^td'Ki,'^) 3n^rwR-ii+ cTsn' 'an^r ^ii<^ J. •r ?T(ITWHf?tl'3TI^T Heard. By these writ petitions, th| posta in the Departmerrt of Rural legality and correctness of or-ders |s petitioners, who are working on various Engineerin9 Services, hwe questioned the |dated 17-2-2006 and 12-6-2006, whereby the Sub-Engineer's of Water Res|3ur'ces Depar'tment have been appointed/ transferred in the Rural Engjneerin^ Services Department. As far as the impugned o concerned, same are already quasf(ed vide order dated 14-7-2006 passed in W.P.Nos.1103/2006 & 2921/2006 aijid similar other connected petitions. As fw os the proyer made dir'ected not to post any person concerned, Shri Pramod Verma & Sf Bar that the DepoTtment [s not deputatic.n/appointment/transfer'ot Depqrtment which ore regular sancf the rules and are t/ing vacant. ^y the petitioners that respondent No.l be Ther-efore, in view of the sti and Shri V.V.S. Murthy in presence are allowed to the extent that the ^rafei^r WRcff ir'teiA <^rezrc ^sri^iTsn^r 'ders dated 17-2-2006 & 12-6-2006 are ^n depufation in the RES Department, is firi V.V.S. Murthy made a statement at the going :o appoint any Officer by way of any post of the Rural Ergineering Services ioned posts as per scheduled attoched with rtement made at the Bor by 5hri P.K. Verma of the Officers of the State, the petitions existing post of RES Department shall rwt be filled by woy of deputation/tran^fer'/appointment by br-ihging officials from the other Departments. As -far os the prayer that t^ie respondents be directed to convene DPC and fill up the promotional posts i»|hich are lying vacant, is concerned, at the first instance, the respondents ha^e already made it clear' in reply that they P.T.O. XI-HC-78 M g^ •<<I<<IC1<1, ®Tfl^'IS, *II*IMI sf»»rr<i»» W?[ 200 3n^?riisi<*i (icit^si<,<r) 3n^TqirR.fi4i gaiT3TI^Tstiliti Soma KW C.J e^iTWHfersn^T +l'i|[cf41-f WRcft' ff fS^& <R|WK ^sri^raT^T are going to fill up these posts. Ev4" today, at the Bar, a statement hos been made that the Department 'is in the ^rocess of filling up of these posts by way of promotion, in accordance with tl^ statement, the relief claimed by the In the above terms, the 17-2-2006 & 12-6-2006 are quashed| Porties are entitled for certi' |e rules. Therefore, in view of the above petitioners' stands snswered. aetitions cre allowed and orders dated ied copy of this order. Sdl- C~8hadoo judge P.T.O. ^ •^^ 'p- '^^1