3 IN TKE HIGH COURT OF JUDlCATURE AT BILASPUR(CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION N0 . ^-s-s.3 OF 2003 / ^ PETITIONER } / Rup Dhan Slngh Netam»sonof1^13^7?^ aged atout "?^ years? Assistant Teacher> primary School? Ghodawar,Block-"Nagrl>District- Dhomtari,(CoGo) VE RS U S RESPONDEOTS /•^ ^:/' ^ ^••^»- ^^ ^'J^.-> V.* 1. State of Chhattisgarh^ through Secretary^ School Education Department, D<,K^3<,Bullding^Montralay» R aipur 9Di st rict- Raipur > (C.G,) 2o Department of Tribal Education^through Secr€tary>D<,K^s<»Building>Mantralay^ Raipur>Distrlct Raipur>(CoGo) 3^ The state Administrative Tribunaly through Secretary» Raipur> District Raipur>(CoGo) ^/ Zi6 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE'227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.FQR ISSUANO; OF APPROPRIATE DIRECTION AS ORDERS REGARDING THE PENDING MATTER |£^^ SEFORE T?S~STATE-A^TH?§TKATIVE TRIBlT^AL BENCH XT RAlPUI ^ ^ -F XI-HC-22 ^^ ^TT^n^R, ^frOTS, fa<ytl<Hy 3n^?r i^ra? ^),f.iOe.2-S'5'3 | t-o0^ "IN^T' wwfnr ^<fl^ 200 ^n^r^T f^wa^^T ^RNr^cT W^T'^TIWHf^T <sbi^I<yi<i1<i W^t'? ^S <Pn^i< ^3?rf^R31T§^r Heard M.K. Bhaduri coun^e! for the petitioner and Shri Praveen Das, Panel Lawyer, for ijhe State/respondents 1 and 2 on advance copy, By this petition fited ujider Articies 226/227 of the Constitution of India the^etiti< permitted to withdraw his c-A|^ Tribunal, Raipur in Original App!ical| The grievance of the petiti4ner is that he WGS transferred on 30/08/2001 from Primary Schoo Dhamtari to Primary School, Boda and that transfer order was Administrative Tribunai at Rdpu matter i^ stiil pendin9. The petitio| Since no member is working in the ^ the patitioner cannot be withdrawn| to the petitioner except to the Constitution of India. ner has^j?rayed that he may be crs^ from the State Administrative ion No.1250 of 2001. |/6hodawQr, Biock N09?!, bistrict [a, Block Nasgri, district bhamtari challenged before the State K The application fiied by the petltioner was registered as Origin^l Application No.1250 of 2001. The State Administrative Tribunai ha^ already been aboiished and the her wants to withdraw thQt matter. |AT, the origjnal applicGtion fiied by There is no other remedy available ^etition under Articie 226 of the [Tft^'^fe~^ T XI-HC-22 '^^r';:^prT?PT, ^N7rs, i^<ni^^< 3ff^?T ^T^ ...^f.:.^..^..^^ WHclT^W^ •^^T' ^3Tr^r'^T 'f^W^^T ^HW^r ^ 371^1 ^RTTacR ^Tf^T -2--!- Since the petitioner wants to Original Appiication No.1250 of Administrative Tribunal and the Tri9unal the appiication filed by the petiti^ner No.1250 of 2001 is directed to be disf 2(1)01 idner In the resuit, the petition is di ohl^i<rt<11Tl 'W^f'? fe^ <f^^« irT3^R3i1^[ withdraw the application namely pending before the State ha3 already been abolished, namely Originai Application ^nissed as withdrawn. ^posed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge