THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.NO.3990 OF 2009 ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against an order dated 4.6.2009 passed in E.P. No. 30 of 2009 in O.S.No.1684 of 2007 by the I Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Respondent No.1 herein is the plaintiff and petitioner herein is the defendant No.1 and 2nd respondent is defendant No.2. Plaintiff filed suit in O.S.No.1684 of 2007 for recovery of certain amount and the suit was decreed and thereafter, plaintiff filed execution petition under Order 21 Rule 43 of CPC for attachment of moveables as shown in schedule property and the Court below passed the attachment order. Aggrieved by the same, the judgment debtor filed the present revision. After the decree has been passed, it is the duty of the judgment debtor to satisfy the decree. If he fails to do so, the decree holder is entitled to enjoy the benefits of the decree. Therefore, the petition filed by the decree holder for attachment of the movables specified in the schedule for execution of the decree, is not unjustified. Therefore, the civil revision petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to avail the alternative remedies that are open to him under Section 60 of the Code of Civil Procedure. ___________ 27-08-2009 rkk