IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No. 24282 of 2004 Between: 1 Damaragidda Ramaiah, s/o Late Yellaiah, 2 Eshamoni Yadaiah, s/o Late Balaiah, 3 Eddla Ananthamma, W/o Late Sayanna, 4 Eddla Srisailam, S/o Late Sayanna, 5 Chidigidda Padmamma, W/o Late Kistaiah. 6 Smt.D.Bommamma, w/o. late D.Ramaiah 7 D.Anjaneyulu, s/o. late D.Ramaiah 8 D.Venkatesh, s/o late D.Ramaiah 9 D.Raghavendra, s/o. late D.Ramaiah (All are R/o Mogiligidda (V), Farooqnagar (M) Mahaboobnagar District). (Respondents 6 to 9 are impleaded as per orders dated 05.06.2009 in WPMP.No.13733 of 2009) ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector, Mahabubnagar District, Mahabubnagar. 2 Sri Karukonda Lingam, Mogiligidda Village,, Farooqnagar (M), Mahabubnagar District. 3 M/s Kedia Alloy Ltd, No. 19-2-226, Bahadoorpura, Near Nehru Zoological Park, Hyderabad, rep. by its Managing Director, Jotender Kumar Kedia S/o Guljal Lal Kedia. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent ie., the District Collector, Mahabubnagar District in not conducting an enquiry and pass appropriate orders on the representation filed by the petitioners on 30-10-2004 relating to the illegalities in establishing the Ferro Alloys Plant by the 3rd respondent in Sy.Nos. 256, 257, 258 and 263 in Mogiligidda (v) as bad, illegal, arbitrary and oppose to law and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI M.VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE SRI NAGESWARA RAO PAPPU The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.24282 of 2004 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of the 1st respondent-District Collector, Mahabubnagar District, in not conducting an enquiry and passing appropriate orders on the representation filed by the petitioners on 30.10.2004. There is no necessity of going into all the details. Since this Court, while admitting the writ petition on 17.05.2005, passed interim orders in W.P.M.P.No.31815 of 2009, whereunder respondent No.1 was directed to pass appropriate orders on the representation filed by the petitioners on 30.10.2004, no orders need be passed in this writ petition and the writ petition is liable to be closed. The writ petition is, accordingly, closed. However, if the representation, dated 30.10.2004, purported to have been filed by the petitioners is not disposed of till date, respondent No.1 shall dispose of the same within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioners. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 05.06.2009 v v