IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.4410 of 2010 ROSHAN KUMAR son of Arvind Kumar Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 17.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under section ¾ of the Explosives Substance Act. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has been implicated in the present case because his motor cycle was found abandoned at the place of occurrence but the submission is that when the occurrence took place he also fled away from the place of occurrence leaving his motorcycle there and he had no animosity with the informant, let the petitioner, above named, who is in custody since 16.12.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, in connection with Bihta P.S. case no.284 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, and (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge - 2 - and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)