IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION NO : 25225 of 1995 Between: Nara Hanmaiah S/o Narsaiah R/o Boomireddipalle , Dharmaram Mandal , Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh Represented by the District Collector, Karimnagar District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer Dharmaram Mandal Karimnagar District. 3 Sri Raja Nayak s/o Harji Nayak Dharmaram , Karimnagar District. 4 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmaram, Karimnagar District. *(4th respondent was impleaded as per Court order Dt.24-11-95 in WPMP 31568/95) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 to evict the petitioner from the lands is illegal, unconstitutional arbitrary, and unfair, and therefore bad in law, and “ the proceedings of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Karimnagar in NO.B/1855/93, assigning an extent of Ac.1-20 guntas in S.No.442/1, Boomiredipalli, Dharmaram Mandal, Karimnagar District to 3rd respondent is void and bad in law” and consequently directing the respondents not to interfere with and stop all further action against the petitioner with regard to dispossession of the petitioner from the land of Ac.4-00 in S.No.442/1, Boomireddipalle, Dharmaram Mandal, karimnagar District. (Prayer is amended as per the Court orders dated 24.11.1995 in W.P.M.P.No.31569 of 1995) Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.G.V.L.N.MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent Nos 1, 2 & 4 .: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.3 :----- The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION NO.25225 OF 1995 ORDER: When the matter was taken up for hearing on 10.3.2005, the learned counsel for the petitioner was absent and the matter was posted to 17.3.2005 under the caption of dismissal. Today when the matter is called, the learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed for default. _________________ Justice T.Meenakumari Dated: 17th March, 2005. Nn. Copy to: 1. The District Collector, The State of Andhra Pradesh, Karimnagar. 2. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Dharmaram Mandal, Karimnagar, District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karimnagar District, Karimnagar. 4. Two C.Cs to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (O.U.T.) 5. Two C.D. Copies.