IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTBGARHA^'BILASPtlR (C.G.) PETITIONER WXS^N023.»?/2006 BFN! G. R. Meshram S/o. Late Dayaram, Aged about 52 years Working as- Assistant Grade II, O/o. Sub- Divisional Officer Water Resources Sub-Division Dongargarh, Distt.- Rajnandgaon(CG). ~\ VERSUS RESPONDENTS : '" 1. StateofCG,Through-Secretaiy,Departmentof lV< Water Resources, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralay, ..<*^<slv" Raipur(CG). c^-3\<s-t ..''^ s^/2" sub~DivisioDal OBice1' watel Resources ...;'^r\5- ^..•" Department, Sub-Division, Dongargarh /••'cx*W^--' ^T' "^••" .^ •>A .0' c ._^^^^~ Department, Sub-Division, Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon(CG). 1\.-'3. L. N. Sonkesharia, Working as Assistant Grade - II, O/o. Sub- Divisional OfGcer, Water Resources Canal, Sub-Division No. 3, Dongargaon, Distt.- Rajnandgaon (CG). T PETITION U/A. 226/2270F THE CONSTITVTION OFINDIA XI-HC-78 3n^T^rR-fi+ BSITSn^Tshtll'b Roshan/- r tTW^fT ai^T^i 3^'-:qraT?p)', ®^lti'is,Rt<nitf^< .^.J?.^^3.1o6 ^ W[ 200 3TT^?T'4ach ('i^t^ci^'T) ?RfIW(rf^(T3IT^T 25.7^006 Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, Advo|: Miss Deepall Pandey, P.L Heard. By this petition, the petitioiji (Annexure P-1) whereby he Dongergaon. Learned counsel for the respondent No.3 have been whereas, the petitioner has never impugned order is passed on the Learned counsel for the allowed to make a detailed respondent No.1 be directed to learned counsel for the State has Having heard leamed facts and oircumstances of the cast of the case, the petitioner is respondent No.1 raising all his copyofthis petition and in turn, re^ the petitloner within a period of 30 in acoordance with law after petitioner, till then the effect and OFJ (Annexure P-1) In respert ofthe pe| With the direction aforesaid.l Consequently, M.QA/.)P. Certified copy as per rules. °bi<iFti41'i Hinvfi if te^t <Ri•Lc;i< ^; srf^IT sn^T |;ate for the petitioner. Vpr the State on advance copy. petitioijier has chatlenged the order dated 4.7.2006 h^s been transferred from Dongeigarh to [setitioner submitted that the petitioner and trar|sferred vice-versa on their own expenses, |made any request for his transfer, therefore, ni|)n-existent ground. |3etitioner submitted that petitioner may be repr^sentation to respondent No.1 and in tum, the same in acco.rdance with law, to which n|3 objection. for the parties and having regard to the i^, without expressing any opinion on the merit atli|>wed to make a detailed representation to within 10 days from today atong with ^pondert No.1 to decide the representation of ipays from the date of receipt of representation co|isidering all the grievances raised by the OFJeration of the impugned order dated 4.7.2006 petitioner shall remain stayed. 1 the petition stands disposed of. No.|2881/06 also stands disposed of. non- dedide courtsel grqvances Sd/- L.C.I Judge P.T.O.