^l- * u^CC>) D^l^ ^^ ^•! .^r' .-^•K-' 11f-^'. '..'. ^ m SHS MABHYA EBAQEBH SIAES ADMBTISTBAlI'ra IBIBIfiAl PBIiiGIPAI, EENCH A2 JABAJ.PIIB (M.P.L. ' gsasa^^ &'^ ^) A^KIl X9\ 9 ^iV vf fLjiJss^SsS APPLICJiu'I'S s O .&£tS:^^/2000 HSSPQNDaJTS : 1. j'Dayaram Soni, aged about ^ l39 years; S/o.Premlal Soni,) icfiuitetm-c-L 2. Dileep Eusiar Yadav, aged aboat 32 years, S/o.Cbetrani yadav, OccusField Worker. 3. Santosh Kumar Saba, aged abou-t 3"! years, S/o.Bhagwat Eaiu Sahu, OccasField worker. All Worki-ng in tbe Gffice Of Haleria Officer, Janjgir, Champa, BIS2I sJMJ'GIE-CEAMPA. versas - 1. State of Madbya Pradesh, Ibroughi Secretary, Departaient of Healtb & Faaa-Iy Welfare, Vallabh Bbawan, mOFAL (I'l.P.). 2. Health Gomialssioner, Dlrectorate of Healtb SerTices, Madbya Pradesb, BHOPAI, (M.P.). 3. Cbief Medical & Health Offioer, J'anjgir-Cbaa'ipa, DISTI iJ'AEIJGIB-C33AMPA(M .P.) th. District Malena Offieer, J^IJGIS-CHAMPA (M.P.) . ^^1 .^^!1^1 m iia «'i"sia •:^'yym 1-3 & "'"'?&, '•^i ^ ^ '3 ^'' •':;^-t ^' :*i^ '•'••-•-i^^. ^ Vk»S::^'_ ^''^i^Bi4ft—7i "^^'' •v.s:./<^'" '?ST ^|<<|d41, ®ti1yil<o,'f^TRTy: ^.I.("?-5^-^S- ^ i U. gn^l -e^RT (ipt^sq) aTl^qff 'ffansn^i wferwT im?ff •ifre^'rfSnsrc ^aiRnsn^i Tumans Shri Shaiiendra Soni, counsel fi Shri Chandresh State/respondents; Shrlvast^va, Pan< Case of the petitioners are that wage worker. Petitioner has oome to a poiicy decision by issuing Circutar daily wage employees for regu'arizatio jthey were initia!ly appointed as daily j;now that State Authority have taken Uated 5.3.2008 to consicier cases of According to learned courlsel for the petitioners, though representation has been made, the Learned counsel for the petitioners Court on 29.1.2009 inW.P.(S) No. 54^/2009. Accordingly, this petition is fir|ally disposed of vi'ith liberfr,' to thi petitioners to flle fresh representation t| grievances raisec! in this petition. On same shall be considered and decidejj bythe respondent No.3 on ;ts O'A'! merits in the light of Circular dated 5.3 If petitloners are continuing i; jranted on 03-05-2000, they shall be are finaliy decided. r the petitioner. -a'Ayer for th< n. tame has not so far been decided. [elies upon direction issued by this »eforethe respondent No.3 raising all ^uch representation belng made, thhn 2008. seri/ice bv virtue of interim orcier allowed to continue until their case SdA ; Manindra Mohac Shrivastava Judge ; ^W^^D ^L^s^^ •;r~