-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1380 OF 2006 Omprakash Nanikram Waswani... ....Petitioner. Versus The Commissioner of Police, Navi Mumbai & Ors.... ..... ... Respondents. Mrs. V.B.Thadani for the Petitioner. Mr. S.R.Nargolkar, AGP for the Respondents. CORAM : V.G. PALSHIKAR, and CORAM : V.G. PALSHIKAR, and CORAM : V.G. PALSHIKAR, and V.R.KINGAONKAR, JJ. V.R.KINGAONKAR, JJ. V.R.KINGAONKAR, JJ. DATED : 21ST MARCH, 2006. DATED : 21ST MARCH, 2006. DATED : 21ST MARCH, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: This petition can be conveniently disposed of by granting amended prayer c(i) of the petition. The Petitioner has sought intervention of this Court so that the application dated 25th January, 2006 to the Commissioner of Police, Navi Mumbai, can be decided. 2. Learned AGP Mr. Nargolkar submitted that unless reply is filed, the petition may not be taken up for hearing. We have rejected his contention in as much as the only relief which we are granting relates to the consideration of the application filed by the -: 2 :- Petitioner before the concerned police authority. The administrative decision may be taken by the Commissioner of Police in accordance with the law. 3. Consequently, Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause c(i) of the petition. Petition is disposed of, accordingly. 4. It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion as regards the merits of the matter. -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-