((-1-)) ms t IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.68 OF 2008 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.43 OF 2008 Arpan Bhupendra Doshi Appellant versus Mrs.Jeenal Arpan Doshi Respondent Shri Sachin Shetye i/by Manoj Dalvi for appellant in CA No.68/2008 in FCA 43/2008. Shri P.V.Nichani for respondent. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI AND SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATE : 16th June 2008 PC : 1. Counsel for the husband states that the husband has regularly forwarded the maintenance amount to the wife at the rate of Rs.5,000/- per month. However, the wife has not accepted the money orders for a period of five months. Learned counsel for the wife, on instructions from the wife, states that the wife has really not accepted the money orders. We do not appreciate this conduct of the wife. If she has any grievance about quantum of maintenance, she can always agitate it in the Court. We make it clear that acceptance of maintenance at ((-2-)) the rate of Rs.5,000/- p.m. by the wife will be without prejudice to all her rights and contentions. Learned counsel for the husband states that during the course of a week an amount of Rs.25,000/- (Rs.Twenty five thousand only) being arrears of five months will be given in cash to learned counsel for the wife so that he can hand it over to the wife. We accept this statement. Learned counsel for the husband states that he wants to regularly pay to the wife an amount of Rs.5,000/- per month towards maintenance, without prejudice to all his rights and contentions. Hence, he does not want to prosecute this Civil Application. Hence, Civil Application No.68 of 2008 is disposed of as not pressed. JUDGE JUDGE ((-3-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.69 OF 2008 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.36 OF 2008 Jeenal w/o Arpan Doshi Appellant versus Arpan Bhupendra Doshi Respondent Mr.P.V.Nichani for appellant. Mr.Sachin Shetye i/by Manoj Dalvi for respondent. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI AND SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATE : 16th June 2008 PC : 1. Learned counsel for the husband states that he wants to file reply so far as prayer for enhancement in maintenance is concerned. Let the reply be filed within one week and a copy be served on the wife. Rejoinder, if any, may be filed by the wife and copy be served well in advance on husband. Adjourned for two weeks. JUDGE JUDGE