^ ^ 5NL5HE HIGH Q5URT OF JUGErO^TURE ^T BTL/ASPUR { S.G^V IUPPaAy3ttTTS NON-CL/AIi-l-aNTS ^' ^ ^3. Mise.^pp^L HO. •^r ./2006 cy m % Vijai Kumar Kevat allas Goddad aged 33 years QQH of Shri Karfc-Qc Ram Kevat resldent of viliage Kosir PolAse Station P^ngarh District Janjgli>— Champa ( C»G^)»«..,Drlver Bidhrara Kevat §ged 35 jQQ.rs son o£ Shri KartJk Ram Kevat resident of vfillage Koslr JPolAce Station PStngarh Dlstt,«<7anjgAr-. Chsanpa (G»G»i) ».„o«ner VEJ5US 1 CT^AIH^NTS ^- 2. ^" 1^ SmtS,Xann a£xxma Bai Qiandrakar widow of late Shri Balmakund Chandrakar aged al^out 23 years» Kti^^dlti Q^andr^kar aged altout OHQ year D/o late Shri Balmatond Chandr^kar Mdnor throixgh guardlaa mother Sm€1 ^nn^xxma Chand^faar^ Shri Lalchanlal Chandrakar aged 50 years son of PhoolsAagh CSiandrakar aaWQcoupadl Bai Chandratear •wlfe of Shri Lakhanlal Chand3^3car aged ^S years<, ^ll resldents of village D^na^.1 Post Damaxu P^S»& Post Tetos^L Baloada Bazar Dlstts,' Raipur (C|Ql) ,§• Omprakasia Kashyap aged ^ iir-;j- ^^£~ 2 - ^ 15 sears sora of Shri Goverdhan Kashyap mlaor th3%>ugh Qaa^ian father Shri ©o^BrdhanRashyap asEi of late Shotearam Kashyap 6^ Oo'yerdhaxi Ka^yap aged 55 yaars / son o£l^te SbotfcaraEn Kashy^) Nos-1 5 and 6 sresid^hts of viliage Damani P»iS|& Tahs^ Balouda^Bazar aistfc»Raipur (C^G») ^ '^yy- The oriental InsdranGe Cbi^pany Brancfa Kaehhari Cfaouk MedicsA Cbllege Raipur Mstt®Raiptir(C^c^l) _M^©Mr^PPEM, UNDER SECTIOH 173 OF THE MG1t5R_ \^^ •VEHlQ.iSS_ACT^L^8 ^PP&^ V^tt^ ^S. 5/6(700 -; ^ XI-HC-78 *11<4<^l Sh^ich 3^T ^qiqicn^, ^Tl1<-IJI<o, f^^ll^y /Y).fi. Cc) ^C- ^.-S ^[ 200^ 311^1 ^i^cn (yii^^) 3T(^T^Tf^TT^ <^TT3TR?T$h^l<=t) c^ ?^c[TW ^fN'3TT^T 13/02/2007 Shri H,S, Patel, counsel f^r Shri Anil Giilati, counsel Shri Atul Prasad, counsel| Heard on M.(C).P No. 136^ Not opposed, For the reasons nieiitioneld aiid delay iiii filiug this appeal is| Also heaixl cn adniission. The oiily ground urged appellaats io. tliis appeal is th^t take nito consideratioii fhe factl was aged 15 yeaTS aiicl also c| tlierefore, tlie leanied M.A,C.T, compensation awai'ded b.y it Goverdhaii Kashyap, owner of for tiie appeUaat did uot .dis| Balinukund Chaiidrakai'.. 011 2( tlie tractor troUey owned by thc tlic date of accident. The arguments advanced| appellaats caiinot be counl coutributor}" negligence on the cycle was not taken by the appe.|lao.t In view of tlie above circii imposiiig tlie MabiHty to pay cj caiinot be faulted witll. chi^fd41^ ^i^<nT^te1(^t<(^^K ^3:rf^TW^T tlie appellants, br respondents' No, 1 to 6, for respoudent No. 7. i/ 2006 for condoiiation of delay. i iri tlie appllcation, it is allowed condoned, by tlie' leanied counsel for tlie tlie leamed M.A.C.T. did not Itliat the driver of tlie MotorcYclc lontribut-ed to the accident ao.cl ought to have apportioned the the appeUaats hereiii aiid Motorcycle. Leained couiisel [pute tliat accidental death of )-04-2003 was estabMshed aad appellmits was not insured 011 between t3ie by th.e teanied counsel for the ^iiEmced because ground of Ipart of tlie d'river of tlie niotor pao.t.s iii tlieix' written statenieiit. ^.nistances, the inipugned award •^nipensatbn 011 fhe appellaiits Li' XI-HC-78 3^T^rR^i<=b c^Tr3TT^Tsh^i<=h sv.r Kvr ^' r ^ ^^ ^A^^ T ^l+ldl sh*ll<sh TST^I^Krl^, ^Tfl^JI^, facni^y ^^c^^^.^X^ ^ 2006 311^1 ^|5|cb (1:|^t3^^) ^RTTW^fN'3^T -a- In tiie result, tliis dismissed at the stage ^ppeal being devoicl of inerit is of adnfa.ission, No order as to costs, ^< 'y chi^?^i41vi HiH<nT^:teT:^t<^i^i< ^3Tf^T3TT^T Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge L! P.T.O.