IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52174 of 2008 AMIT KUMAR LAL @ AMIT KUMAR, Son of Sunil Lal @ Sunil Prasad Sinha, Resident of Village- Tikaitpur, P.S.- Bihar, District- Patna ----------------- Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ---------------- Opposite Party ----------- 3. 20.1.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner has moved for bail for third time before this Court for grant of bail under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been made an accused in this case because the victim girl’s father wanted to snatch the house of the petitioner by sending him to jail and has filed this false and fabricated case. On the other hand, it has also been argued that the petitioner is a minor, which contradicts the stand that the petitioner has made accused to pressurize him for giving up his house. This submission is being made for the first time on third attempt that the petitioner is a minor. It may be that this point has been raised on a earlier occasion to delay the trial. Learned counsel further submits that the case has been committed and is ready for trial. No doubt the Court below would look at the defence raised on behalf of the petitioner at the time of the trial or any other stage. The bail application is rejected. P. Kumar (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)