IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.2895 OF 1991 M/s.Sudarshan Engineering Co. ....Plaintiffs V/s. Rahul Jagdale & Anr. ....Defendants Mr.A.G. Toraskar for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 11TH AUGUST, 2009. P.C. :- 1. The suit is filed to recover the price of the goods sold and delivered by the Plaintiffs to the Defendants. On behalf of the Plaintiffs, a compilation of the documents is tendered in Court, taken on record and marked Exhibit-A collectively. 2. The Plaintiffs by a letter dated 21.12.1987 submitted an offer in respect of the said goods. The Plaintiffs supplied the said goods and in respect thereof raised invoices. The invoices stipulated the interest at 18% p.a. on the amounts remaining unpaid one month after the delivery. 3. There is no written statement. There was no reply to the Plaintiff’s advocates notice demanding payment. There is nothing on record that militates against the Plaintiffs’ claim. In fact through inadvertence it appears that the Plaintiffs have incorrectly to their detriment claimed an amount less than what they are entitled to. 4. In the circumstances, the suit is decreed as prayed. Refund, if any, as per rules.