IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR^C.^.) f^ l/^ MISC. APPEAL (0 N0. IS^ 'OF 2009 APPELLANT ^. Indira Bai © Indra W/o. Shri Raju bhimar Claimant aged about 20 years, R/o. Kurud, Tahsil - Kurud -^'f^^'.. ^.^fo^f Distt.- Dhamtari ( C.G.) r^!: ^^'"' rr'- VERSUS RESPONDENTS. 1. Nandkumar S/o. Ganesh Ram, Aged about 35 Years, r/o. Village - Khamhart'ya, Tahsil - Bemetara, Distt.- Durg (C.&.) 2. Vijay Rathi S/o. Shri Radheshyam Ratji, aged about 30 Years, r/o.&anjpara, burg Tahsil and bistt.- burg ( C.G.) 3. The Branch Manager, y! The National Insurance Company Ltd., Branch Office Krishana Complex, &. E. Raod Raipur , Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) MEMO RANbUM OF MISC APPEAL UNDER SECTCON 173 OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, L_.. 3- \^ HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR CORAM: Hon'bleShri I.M. Quddusi,& Hon'ble Shn Prashant Kunriar Mishra, JJ« M.A. faNo.1562 of 2009 APPELLANT Indira Bai @ Indra. Versus RESPONDENTS Nandkumar and others. APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT. 1988 Appearance: Shri Sunil Sahu and Shri Abhishek Saraf, counsel for the appellant. Shri B.N. Nande,counsel for respondent No. 3. Following I. M. Quddusi. J. ORALORDER (02/02/2011) oral order of the Court was passed by This appeal has been fited by the claimant against the impugned award dated 29/09/2009 of the Additional Motor Accident Clajms Tribunal (F.T.C.), Dhamtari (C.G.) passed in Claim Case No. 51/2007. 2. The brief facts of the case are that on 18/05/2003 at about 1 2-1 p.m. at National Highway No.43 Truck bearing Registration No.C.G. 07 Z.C. 2818 being driven rashly and negligently by non-applicant No,1 near Ganpati Rice Mill dashed the appellant and caused accident due to which appellant received grievous injuries. She was admitted at Masihi Hospital, Dhamtari for treatment. Before acddent she was doing the work of vegetable seller and worked as labourer in agricultural field and used to earn Rs.3000/- per month. The claimant has claimed compensation of Rs.4,00.000/-. 3 . The claimant is allegedly a injured person having no permanent disabjlity, no fracture and also having no cash memos of the medicines or any evidence to the effect that she got treatment and in getting treatment she spent money. .,;?-if*^ •y"^\ "^ "^ 1 ^v '^y ^^•^^":' 4. In the above circumstances, the claims Tribunal dismissed the claim petition of the claimanVappellant which cannot be said to be inappropriate, therefore fhe appeat has no force and is dismissed. Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge ^l^