1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 121 OF 2003 1. Sakhubai w/o Baliram Jadhav 2 Keshav s/o Prabhu Jadhav ...Appellants Versus 1 Sou.Padminibai w/o Kishanrao Abadar 2 Smt. Kerabai w/o Behraji Wankhede (deleted) ...Respondents ..... Mr. N.K. Tungar, advocate for the appellant Mr. G.D. Kale, advocate for respondent No.1 ..... CORAM: R.G. KETKAR, J. DATED: 10TH DECEMBER, 2009 PER COURT:- 1 The parties have amicably settled the controversy between them and they tendered a consent terms duly affirmed by the appellants as well as respondent No.1. The said consent terms are signed by the learned counsel appearing for the parties. The consent terms is taken on record and marked "X" for identification purpose. The appellants and respondent No.1 are present today in this Court. They have admitted the correctness of the consent terms. Learned 2 counsel appearing for the parties further state that the consent terms are explained to the parties in Marathi and they have understood the same. 2 I am satisfied that the controversy between the parties has been adjusted wholly by lawful agreement in the form of consent terms marked "X". Clause 3-c of the consent terms provides that an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- deposited by the applicants, may be allowed to be withdrawn by them. It is submitted that considering the age of applicant No.1 Sakhubai, applicant No.2 Keshav may be permitted to withdraw the amount. Hence, applicant No.2 Keshav is permitted to withdraw an amount of Rs.1,00,000/-, as per the consent terms marked "X". 3 Second appeal is disposed of in terms of the consent terms with no order as to costs. Decree to be drawn accordingly. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) rlj/