IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (2271 N0. ^^OF 2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS :1) '.\y. ^"'y^ '..i-''^-" v<\ Smt. Kokiya Bai, wife of Shri Satpat Singh Sidar, aged about 42 years; Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Sankra, resident of viUage-Sankra, Police Station-Sankra, Janpad Panchayat Pithoura, TehsU & District- Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS Additional Coniinissioner, Raipur Division, Raipur, District-Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Upper Collector, Mahasamund, District-Mahasaraund (Chhattisgarh) !.<>••' ».\A ^^ '^^ Sub-Divisional Pithoura, (Chhattisgarh) OfEicer (Revenue), District-Mahasamund 4) 5) •^' 6) 7r 8) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pithoi.ira, District- Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) Smt. Basanti Soni, Panch, Ward No.5, Gram Panchayat Sankra, Janpad Panchayat Pithoura, Tehsil-Pithoura, District-Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) Rajesh Ki-tmar, son of Shri S.S. Ki.unar, Panch, Gram Panchayat Sankra, Janpad Panchayat Pithoura, Tehsil- Pithoura, District-Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) Preetpal Singh Chhabra, son of Shri Trilok Singh, Up-Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Sankra, Janpad Panchayat Pithoiu-a, Tehsil-Pithoura, District- Mahasam.und (Chhattisgarh) Kalap Ram Sahu, son of Shri Ghasi Ram Sahu, Panch, Gram. Panchayat ^•eAteqouBd pBdirep '^JS(UBS fe.&Bvpusd UIBJO 'vpvced '•ejq^qqo qguig sioiuj, uqg jo 3JIM 'BjqBifqo -nTB^ ireXo '^TUS (91: (qjBgSTl^L[L[0) pim.uresBi.[Bp\[-i.3T-4sia '-ejnoLpid -Hsqsj, 'BjnoLpTd va&Bvpued p^drrep 'Bj3[ues feSevpusd VECB.IQ 'qoired 'iipBjigBqg uqg jo SJTM 'pomueg 'iuig (g^ (qjB§sp^qqo) punuresBi[B]/^-^otqsiQ 'Bjnoq^id-nsqsj, 'Bjnoq^ij fB&svpUTBd pBdirep 'VJS[WBQ VBSBVpvced UIBJQ 'qouBj 'Aapiep uqS jo ajiM 'ure^N pouiiBp •img (f,! (ilJBgswBqqo) punures^qByi-^OLqsTa '^jnOLpid-iTsqsj, '-ej.novffid V3^1svpwBd pBduep 'Bj5[Lreg VaSsvpvpe^ ure-to 'vpUB^ 'ABqppn ULtS J° 3J?M 'TBa ^MSBJBg "^uig (ei: (qjBgs^Bqqo) punuresBqB]/\[-^ouisiQ 'Bjnoi.pid -{isqsj, 'vinovpid vaSBVpvced p^dirBp 'Bj3(ireg ysSsvpwsd vdBJiQ 'qoired 'ipBuureH ijqg jo ajTM 'reg wa^ •ims (gl (qjBgsp^qqo) punuresBi.[Bp\[-^OL4siQ 'Bjnoq^id -p8l[3J, 'BjnOq^Td VBSBVpVCBd pvdUBp '•ejs[W8Q va&evpvsd ureJQ 'qoired 'LrefuBjr^ uqg jo ajiA 'reg OJTCQ "^uig (l T (qjGSsr^BL[i[o) punuiBSBqBi^-^ou^siQ 'Bjnoi.pid-psqsj, 'vj.novyi^ fsSBVpvcB^ pBdUBp 'VJSpIBQ fSSBVpVCBd VOBJ.Q 'qouBd 'nunSsj, jo uos 'jBL[ppApTy\ (oi (qjBgsTi^qqo) pumrres^L[B]^-^oi-4siQ 'Bjnoqi.id-lisr[3j, 'Bjnoq^y VB&evpusd p^direp '^jipreg Va&BVpTiB^ ureJQ 'qouBd 'nqeg UIB^ jBpuniireg uqg jo uos 'ni.[Bg Suig ure^ (5 (qj^gsrt^qqo) punuiBSBi[Bp\[-^3i-qsTQ 'Bjnoq^id-{isq3j, 'Bjnoqiid fBSBVpusd p^duep 'BJSpieg ^ Pithoura, Tehsil-Pithoura, Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) District- 17) Smt. Taj Bee Khan, wife of Shri Sher Khan, Panch, Gram Panchayat Sankra, Janpad Panchayat Pithoura, Tehsil- Pithoura, District-Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE-227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA M\ F7ir"^T"T r'-O.T TDrF .T^T-'' r'T-JTJ /\'TT^Qf~-A^i i-J A'T T3T'? A 0'H-T 'H3 KTU ^.i.^l^K i \^f ^-!~1MA ! i J^iL7^KI~X A il J~5ii ^A^J^UK 'nT^T'TT''T<'~ki^TT.''T r-Ji' 111 l^_j'l^' £/1'< RESPONDENTS WRTT PETmOiN (227^ No. 6795 of2011 Snit, -K-olciv/3.. B^i. V Tj i\^ff.JC: AdditiotKi.l ConimissiQner. R^.iDiir i^ivisiou sz, uiaerEs. W5IT PETH'ION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF •I'HE CONS'n'iUTION OF.jNDIA SB: Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, ,1'. Prescnt.: Shd v-K,Pa.ndev. Advocate fortfee Det.itioner. S^'L^-1 T* ?.-" T^'l—.-.3.-„.'Tk—-^.-"3T ^nn i'.^.i^iui.dLin. x'riiii.;! i. '"? 10 ."7 . f.,^ .I'L... 0-! .-J .-/—.—-.—.3.—-i 'M ;r ior inc ^iaic/respouuSui PN (Passed on 18 day cfNovembsr, 2011) 1. Bv this oet.ition. the Detitioner seeks auashing of the order dated 22.10=2011 'Aiinexiire P/l') passed bv the I'esDOiident N0= 1. whsrebv } the st.a.v order dated 27,06.201 1 oa.ssed bv the CoUector. Mahasamuad. in fa.vour ofttie Detitioner. has been staved. 2. At the vers.1' out^et. Shri Pandev. learsisd counsel aDr?ea.riii@ for the Detitioner submits t.hat the oetitioner does not. want to eontest t.tiis r'eTitiou on meiits ^t this stage. a.nd pra.vs t.ha.t the Additional CoiT^Hiissioner- S-s.ipiir ma.v b§dijected to re-consid^r the a.Dplieal.ion fbr erant of stav. nied nv the resnondent No. 5 to 18 aeauist the order r'Hssed tyv tiic ^.'oilectoF- ^.s ihc iniDusiisct st^.v' order ^^.^^ "?" in ^ni i "?" in ^ni i ^^-. iy,.&yll ('Aiiiiexiire p,/lv) was uassed wi'tiioirf. aiiordios an ODDort.uriitv to tlie Detitioiicr t.o Di^t torward his ease- 3. Lesmed counsei annearins for ot.her side has HO obieciion. in view of the above. smce the iiTiDusned order dated 22.10.201 iAiinexiu'e P/l' was pa.ssed withoiAt affordiiig ODDQrt.iuiitv csi hea.rin^ to the petitioner. the Additionai Comruissioner. RaiDur Division is directed to re-consider t.hs aDniication fll^d bv tlie resnoiident No. 7 to i<^ ^.gH.lllSl. TIl§ ulT.enill OFCisF gfs.nteci oy tli©^..-oiisctor, s.il.sr s.ttorclHiH •nn onportiimtv of hearins to tiie netitioner. aild thereaft.er. Dass a.ppropriate order, in accoTdance wifh law. 5. With fhe afbresaid observ'ation and direction. the wriT netition is CiiSDOSeCt Ol'. Sd/- SATBH K. ANGNMORI Judge