IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 14TH MARCH 2011 / 23RD PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 6122 of 2011(M) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.K.RAJAN, HEADMASTER, PARAMBIL L.P.SCHOOL, PONMERIPARAMBIL P.O., VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.BOSE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695001. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695001. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE- 673001. 4. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THODANNUR, VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673001. 5. MANAGER, PARAMBIL L.P.SCHOOL, PONMERIPARAMBIL P.O., VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673001. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.M.R.SREELATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.6122 OF 2011-M --------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2011 J U D G M E N T The Writ Petition is filed mainly challenging Exhibit P9 order of suspension issued by the Deputy Director of Education under Section 12A of the Kerala Education Act. The petitioner is the Headmaster of an L.P.School. The suspension order Exhibit P9 originated from a dispute regarding the cancellation of certain divisions in the school and the consequential posts sanctioned based on the visit by the Super Check Cell. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the premises under which the order of suspension issued cannot be justified. It is further pointed out that the order is not in compliance with the provisions of Section 12A of the Act. 2. Along with I.A.No.4527/11, the petitioner has produced Exhibit P10, which is filed as a representation challenging Exhibit P9 before the Government. The petitioner has stated various grounds in Exhibit P10. Therein the petitioner has also prayed for a stay of operation of the proceedings. W.P.(C). No.6122/2011 -:2:- 3. There will be a direction to the 1st respondent- Government to take a decision on Exhibit P10, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. In the meanwhile, the prayer to grant stay will also be considered and appropriate orders will be passed. The petitioner will produce a copy of the Writ Petition along with a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent-Government for compliance. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. dsn