IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.5156 of 2010 RAMSURAT MANJHI, son of Surendra Manjhi Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 07.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 395, 397 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the First Information Report nor has there been any recovery from his possession, but subsequently, when certain jewelry was found buried under the earth, some witnesses stated that the petitioner had been seen sitting near the said place and, therefore, he has been implicated in the present. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named, who is in custody since 10.11.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Gaighat P.S. case no. 116 of 2007, subject to the conditions (i)that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner,(ii)that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse,(iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do - 2 - so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv)that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)