THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3594 of 2010 Dated 20th August, 2010 Between: K. Kondanda Ramaiah. …Petitioner And J. Venkateswarlu. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri J. Janaki Rami Reddy Counsel for respondent: -- The Court made the following: ORDER: This civil revision petition arises out of the order dated 27.07.2010 passed in I.A.No.453 of 2010 in O.S.No.1226 of 2007 on the file of II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool. The petitioner is the defendant in the abovementioned suit filed by the respondent for recovery of certain money on the foot of a promissory note. He filed the abovementioned I.A. under Order XXVI Rules 4 and 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to cross examine him (D.W.1). This application was dismissed by the Court below. The present revision is filed assailing the said order. I have heard Sri J. Janaki Rami Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. From the details given by the Court below, I am of the opinion that the application filed by the petitioner absolutely lacks bona fides. He has not produced any proof of his claim that he met with an accident on 11.07.2010 and that he is not in a position to attend the Court for giving evidence. The background leading to filing of the application also suggests that the petitioner has been making every effort to procrastinate the proceedings. In the light of the detailed facts and the reasons for which the Court below has dismissed the application, I do not find any reason to interfere with the order under revision. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the C.R.P., C.R.P.M.P.No.4812 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 20th August, 2010 GHN