1 crap1151.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1151 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 389 OF 1999 Vasudeo Janardhan Vaidya ...Applicant/Appellant VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ..... Shri S.P.Chapalgaonkar, advocate for applicant/appellant Smt. Y.M.Kshirsagar, A.P.P. for respondent/State ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 17 th March, 2011 PER COURT : 1 Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2 Issue notices to the respondent. Smt. Y.M.Kshirsagar, learned A.P.P. waives service of notice for the respondent. 3 This is an application preferred by the applicant (original 2 crap1151.11 accused) requesting to recall the order, dated 8.3.2011, passed by this court for issuance of bailable warrant against the applicant/appellant. The applicant/appellant is present today in the court in person. It is submitted that the bailable warrant issued on 8.3.2011 has not been executed so far. 4 Considering the contents of the application and considering the submissions advanced by the learned respective counsel for the parties, as well as considering the position that the applicant/appellant is present in the court today in person, the present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ thereof and the bailable warrant issued against the applicant/appellant by this court on 8.3.2011 stands recalled, with direction to the applicant/appellant to remain present on the next date i.e. 31.3.2011 and present application stands disposed of accordingly. 5 Humdast permitted. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE), JUDGE. dbm/crap1151.11