IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25852 of 2003 Between : Nayana Srinivas (Srinu), S/o. Adinarayana, Councillor, Ward No.30, D.No. 4-8-31, Krishnamurthy Street, Ramakrishnaraopet, Kakinada, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Govt.of A.P., Rep.by its Prl.Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development (Elec-I) Dept., Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 Kakinada Municipality, Rep.by its Commissioner, Kakinada. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one under Writ of Mandamus, declaring G.O.Ms.No.525 M.A.(Municipal Administration & Urban Development (Elec-I) Department), dated 18-11- 2003 issued by the respondent No.1 as illegal and ultra virus to the provisions of Article 14 of Constitution of India and also the mandatory provisions of A.P.Municipalities Act besides being violative of principles of natural justice. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.V.S.R.ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following : ORDER : It is represented by the learned counsel for petitioner that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 17th July 2009 ajr