1 (56)NMA.479.2011-ARBP.262.2003.sxw mnm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 479 OF 2011 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 262 OF 2003 Nirmala M. Khadawala ...Petitioner Vs. M/s. Vithal Bhelwala & Ors. ...Respondents And Lalitkumar Uttamdas Gajaria ...Third party Applicant Ms. Sanober B. Nanavati, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. Kirti Munshi a/w Ms. Deepali Thakor a/w. Ms. Harshal Manik i/b. Rustamji & Ginwala, Advocates for Applicants Ms. R.C. Nichani a/w. Mr. Amit Sheth, Advocates for Respondent No.2 Mr. Y.V. Divekar, Advocate i/b. Divekar & Co., for Respondents 4,5 & 6 CORAM : SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : 4TH OCTOBER, 2011 P.C. : 1. The parties have had their disputes agitated in Arbitration. It is settled between the parties to the Arbitration as well as the landlord that there a door between points G & H shown in the sketch plan submitted by the parties. This door is locked from inside. Consequent upon such locking the entire tenanted premises of the parties to the Arbitration being the hotel premises and the kitchen is protected. The Court Receiver is appointed. He has to seal the premises under his lock. Hence the Court Receiver shall fix his lock only within the premises denoted by G & H. 2 (56)NMA.479.2011-ARBP.262.2003.sxw 2. The portion outside the tenanted premises which is shown in blue on the plan is, therefore, not under the lock of the Court Receiver. 3. The plan has been signed by all the above Counsel appearing on behalf of the parties as also the representative of the landlord and one of the partners of the firm in Arbitration. 4. The Notice of Motion is disposed off accordingly. 5. The Plan is kept on record. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.)