IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH JUNE 2007 / 6TH ASHADHA 1929 WP(C).No. 19320 of 2007(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ R.RAJAN, S/O.RAMAN, 54 YEARS, VADAKKANAL PUTHAN PURAYIL HOUSE, VENNOOR VILLAGE, VENNOOR P.O., TALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR, PIN : 680 587. BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE (A.D.M.), THRISSUR - 3. 2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (AEE), KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, CHELAKKARA DIVISION, CHELAKKARA P.O., THRISSUR. 3. SHEEJA MURALI @ SHEEJA, W/O.MURALI, THONDAYIL HOUSE, VENNOOR VILLAGE, DESOM, VENNOOR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SHRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------- WP(C) No. 19320 of 2007 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 27th day of June, 2007 J U D G M E N T Since learned Standing Counsel for the KSEB submitted that line proposed is only 25 meters of weather proof line, that too, over a pathway, petitioner obviously cannot have any grievance, WP(C) is closed recording the submission of the learned Standing Counsel, KSEB, with direction to the 2nd respondent to draw the line using weather proof cable through the pathway as stated. I make it clear that drawl of line over petitioner's property does not effect petitioner's right over the land if petitioner is the owner of the land in which the pathway exists. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) jg