23. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1169/2008 YOGENDER SINGH GAHLOT Through: None. versus SUMAN GAHLOT Through: None. CORAM: ..... Petitioner ..... Respondent HON.BLE MS. JUSTICE ARUNA SURESH ORDER 26.10.2009 Present none despite Passover. The petition is dismissed in default. OCTOBER 26, 2009 bg ARUNA SURESH, J. Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified A-1. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1169/2009 SMT.ROOPA & ANR. .. ... Petitioners Through: None. versus SH.AZAD@ AJAY ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: ( HON.BLE MS. JUSTICE ARUNA SURESH r ORDER .. o/o 10.09.2010 File has been received from the Reg is try noting that the parties name and case number have been wrongly mentioned in the order dated 26th October, 2009. It is noted that on that day, another CM(M) No.1169/2008, titled 'Yoginder Singh Gahlot Vs. Suman Gahlot' was also listed for hearing and the said case after hearing was reserved for • orders. Final orders have been passed in the said petition on 13th August, 2010. It seems that a typographical mistake has crept in the order dated 26th October, 2009 because Registration Number in both the CM(M) was the same, except that this petition was registered CM(M) 1169!2009 Page 1 of 2 in 2009 whereas CM(M) No. 1189/2008 was registered in 2008. This has resulted into wrong description of the parties to the petition. Order dated 26th October, 2009 is hereby modified and after modification, it be read:- "+ CM(M) 1169/2009 SMT.ROOPA & ANR. Through: None. versus SH.AZAD@ AJAY Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ARUNA SURESH ORDER o/o 26.10.2009 Present none despite Passover. The petition is dismissed in default." File be sent back to the Registry. ..... Petitioners ..... Respondents ARUNA SURESH, J. SEPTEMBER 10, 2010 sb CfVJ(fVI) 1169!2009 Page 2 of 2