[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLAGTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2360 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2360 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2360 OF 2005 IN IN IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.21452 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.21452 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.21452 OF 2005 Shrikant Shivaji Patil & Ors. ...Applicants V/s Shivaji Maruti Patil & Ors. ...Respondent. Mr. Macchindra A. Patil for the applicants. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. DATE : 19TH JUNE, 2006. DATE : 19TH JUNE, 2006. DATE : 19TH JUNE, 2006. p.c. . Heard the learned Counsel for the applicants. None appeared for the respondents, though served. Service affidavit has already been filed. 2. Perused the Civil Application. By this Civil Application, the applicants are seeking condonation of delay. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). [2] ( DR.S RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) ( DR.S RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) ( DR.S RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)