IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-27119 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:07.09.2011 Santokh Singh . . .Petitioner Versus State of Punjab . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.A.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. Prayer is for pre-arrest bail in a case registered vide FIR No.79 dated 9.8.2011 under Sections 302, 307, 323, 356, 427, 109, 148 & 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) at Police Station Nehianwala, District Bathinda. The allegations are that petitioner had started quarrel along with Dharminder Singh when he had forcibly entered the Abadi land of the deceased for taking possession. After that non-applicant Dharminder Singh extorted the co- accused, who attacked Gurdeep Kaur and killed her by strangulation. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has tried to project that there is no door of the Abadi land and the story propounded by the Prosecution is patently false and that the petitioner is an old man who is not in position to commit any murder. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have perused the available record from which I have found that there is a categoric allegation against the petitioner of having started quarrel in which Gurdeep Kaur has lost her life. Therefore, the discretionary relief of anticipatory bail cannot be extended to him and hence the bail application is hereby dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) SEPTEMBER 07, 2011 JUDGE Vivek