IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1 of 2009 AJAY KUMAR SINGH Versus THE V.C.OF VIR KUNWAR SINGH UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- 2/ 06/11/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the University. If the petitioner, as claimed, has applied for retotalling of marks in accordance with law in the manner prescribed and deposited the necessary fee, the Respondents are obliged to proceed to examine his request in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders. Since the petitioner claims that his admission to the 2nd year of the Law course is dependent on the result of such retotalling, this Court considers it proper to direct that retotalling of the marks and furnishing of his results be done expeditiously, so that the petitioner be not deprived of his opportunity for admission to the 2nd year of his course but strictly in accordance with law. The writ application stands disposed. AKS/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)