IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD Second Appeal No.208 of 2004 Between: Narayanappa and others .. Appellants AND Venkatesulu and others .. Respondents JUDGMENT: A memo is filed on behalf of the respondents/plaintiffs and the 1st defendant stating that they compromised the matter out of Court with the other parties and the appeal may be allowed and the judgment and decree of the first appellate Court may be set aside. Along with the memo, a letter addressed by respondents 1 to 3 to the second appeal, to their learned counsel, dated 19-09-2011 was also filed, wherein also respondents 1 to 3 stated that in view of the settlement of the matter out of Court with the appellants, the second appeal may be allowed and the suit may be dismissed as settled out of Court. Sri G. Shanker, learned counsel identified respondents 1 to 3 who are physically present before the Court and they also admitted the instructions given by them through the letter to their learned counsel and desired that the appeal be allowed and the suit be dismissed. Heard Sri G. Shanker, learned counsel for respondents 1 to 3 and Sri R.V. Nagabhushana Rao, learned counsel for the appellants. In the light of the above circumstances, the second appeal is allowed without costs and the suit shall stand dismissed without costs. _____________________ G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J Date: 20-09-2011 Svv