1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 6235/2010 Sohanlal Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 13.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Rajesh Sharma - for the petitioner Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor Mr Kartar Singh – for complainant BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co- accused has been granted bail hence petitioner may also be enlarged on bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for complainant have opposed the bail application. They submit that while arguing bail of co-accused Shyam Sunder it was urged by the same learned counsel that entire evidence of causing cruelty and demand of dowry is against husband, father- in-law and mother-in-law. In the light of above arguments, different arguments raised herein may not be accepted. Hence, petitioner may not be granted bail. 2 After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Therefore, bail application is dismissed. If charges have already framed, trial court is expected of to record statements of material witnesses at first instance and on recording of their statements, petitioner would be at liberty to file a fresh bail application. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma