IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 11330 of 2011-C. Decided on: 21st December, 2011. Ajeet Singh son of Shri Birbal R/O village Bela, P.O. Nadaun, Tehsil Nadaun, Distt. Hamirpur, H.P. presently working as Lecturer in Commerce in Govt. Senior Secondary School, Ambehra, Distt. Una. Petitioner. Versus 1. State of H.P. through Principal Secretary, Elementary Education to the Govt. of H.P. 2. Director of Elementary Education, Shimla. 3. Deputy Director of Elementary Education, Hamirpur. 4. Principal, Govt. Senior Secondary School, Ambehra, Distt. Una. Respondents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “(a) To issue writ in the nature of Mandamus with a direction to respondents to count period rendered by the petitioner on tenure basis from 30.4.1988 to till date of his regularization for the benefits of financial increments especially increments, seniority and all other consequential benefits.” 2 2. The petitioner claims the benefit of increments, seniority and other consequential benefits during the tenure period of service rendered by him. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in his favour by the judgment of this Court dated 16.12.2010 rendered in CWP No. 4550 of 2010 titled as Ravi Kumar vs. State of H.P. & others. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment referred to above, take appropriate action thereon and the eligible benefits shall be disbursed to him within a period of four months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment, referred to above. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 21st December, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (tr) Judge.