IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7911 of 2009 SARIKA KUMARI Versus THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD ----------- 4 5.8.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the Deputy General Manager, L.P.G. as respondent no.6. The petitioner prays for reconsideration of the her complaint dated 9.2.2009 whereby wrong markings of 7 marks in place of 10 marks have been allotted to her in respect of parameters relating to “Norms for Evaluating the Candidates” in respect of possession of title. The petitioner submits that as per the advertisement the intending candidate was to satisfy whether it held about 14 Sq.meters of land at the relevant premises. The petitioner submits that he along with her sister-in-law namely Archana Tiwary possessed 1 decimal of land which came to the tune of about 40.40 Sq.meters and even if it is presumed that the petitioner would be owing half of it, still she would be having title to the extent of 20 Sq.meter which will clearly cover the parameters of possession of 13.5 Sq.meter of land and as such she would be entitled to full 10 marks in place of 7 marks. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the position would have been different if both the petitioner and her sister-in-law would have possessed only 13.5 sq.meters of land but here the situation is different. 2 KHAN Mr. K.D.Chatterjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Indian Oil Corporation states that the requirement was possession of clear title in respect of 13.5 sq.meter of land. However, admittedly the petitioner along with one Archana Tiwary possessed one decimal of land. He submits that the request form of the petitioner did not accompany the No Objection Certificate of Archana Tiwary. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that once the defect was pointed out she had filed necessary Bazadvinama and No Objection Certificate. After hearing counsel for the parties, this court observes that if the petitioner files a representation raising all her points as urged in this writ petition before the Deputy General Manager, L.P.G., respondent no.6, he would dispose of the same by a speaking order within three weeks from the date of its receipt. The allotment of any dealership would be subject to the adjudication of the matter by the Deputy General Manager, L.P.G. It would be open for all concerned to intervene, if so required. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J)