IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 24TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 5TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 30794 of 2008(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- PRASANNAN, BHARATHI NIVAS, MUTTAPALAM, PERUMKUZHI P.O., PIN 695 303. BY ADV. MR.M.BALAGOVINDAN MR.M.R.SASITH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CIRAYINKEEZHU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CHIRAYINKEEZHU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, CHIRAYINKEEZHU P.O. 2. MATHEWSAJI, AMBALAYAM NEAR RAILWAY STATION, CHIRAYINKEEZHU P.O. ADVS. MR.THOMAS T.VARGHESE FOR R1 MR.N.SASI FOR R1 MR.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 30794 of 2008 EXT.P1: COPY OF THE SALE DEED IN SY. NO.295/A2/6, A2/2& A2/3 OF SARKARA VILLAGE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK DT.5.3.1990. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE APPROVED PLAN SUBMITTED BY R2 BEFORE R1. EXT.P3: COPY OF COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE R1 ON 22.10.2007. EXT.P3(a): COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT EVIDENCING THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE COMPLAINT BY R1. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.35992/07 DTD 5.12.2007. EXT.P5: COPY OF NOTICE DTD 8.1.2008. EXT.P6: COPY OF STATEMENT GIVEN BY R2 BEFORE R1. EXT.P7: COPY OF THE NOTICE DT. 29.3.2008. TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.30794 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of February, 2009 JUDGMENT In respect of an allegation that the 2nd respondent has constructed a building in violation of the building rules, Exts.P5 and P6 proceedings have been initiated by the 1st respondent. The petitioner seeks expeditious orders in those proceedings. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the respondents also. From Exts.P5 and P6, it is clear that the 1st respondent has initiated proceedings in respect of the complaint of the petitioner. That being so, the 1st respondent has to take the proceedings to its logical conclusion expeditiously. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to take the proceedings evidenced by Exts.P5 and P6 to its logical conclusion, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as the 2nd respondent. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd