IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9629 of 2008 Between: Bathula Yadaiah Goud … Petitioner AND The Inspector of Police, Hayathnagar P.S., Cyberabad, Hyderabad & another. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri V. Jithender Rao Sri S. Satyam Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1: AGP for Home This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9629 of 2008 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.1 in interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.2 in connection with Ac.5.15 guntas of land in Sy.No.250 of Pasumamula Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal and arbitrary. On the complaint given by respondent No.2, respondent No.1 registered a criminal case against the petitioner and filed charge sheet, which was taken on file by the learned VII Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, Hyderabad as CC.No.625 of 2007. The petitioner filed criminal petition No.1302 of 2008 and persuaded this Court to grant stay of all further proceedings. The petitioner alleged that despite the said order of this Court, respondent No.1 has been interfering with the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property at the instance of respondent No.2. At the hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, stated that except registering the criminal case and filing charge sheet, respondent No.1 has not been interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.2 and that he undertakes not to interfere in such civil disputes in future. This undertaking given by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on behalf of respondent No.1 is placed on record and the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to avail his remedies in the event respondent No.1 interferes in the civil disputes in future. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.12709 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 01.05.2008 ES