BEFORETHEM.P. STATEADMINISTRATIVETRIBUNALBENCH RAIPUR ,',;•• ///'t J(-1 l,->i'(^\, 'O.A. N0. /2001 ~^^s^^^~~ \ <toAy.a?ff-L^^...- J .„,; MA-H j^ )^-S.hlM »i3!-4- APPLICANT NON-APPLICANT Jt.'f ;;';.iuna;. DR. TOPLALVERMA— Son ofLate H.S.Verma Asstt. Professor Deptt. of Geography Govt. Chhattisgarh College, Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS 1. StateofC.G. through the Secretary Department of Higher Education Govt. ofChhattisgarh, D.KS.Bhavan, Raipur 2. Prindpal Govt. Chhattisgarh College, Raipur(C.G.) Ar'Uf^ ORIGINAL APPLICATION UNDERSECTION 19 OF THE M.P. STATE ADMINISTRATIVETRIBUNALACT. 1985 HIGH COURT ORCHHATTISGftRH AT BILASPUR SINGLEBENCH : HON'Bl.EMR.SATtSHK.AGNIHOTRI.J. WRIT PETITIONfS.t N0.4420 OF 2005 Petjtioner Respondents Versus Dr. Toplal Verma Stateof C.G. and another 'BIIB ;®;-IBBI :M Present : iyir. Maneesh Sharma, counsei for the petitioner. !V!r. V.y.S.Moorthy, Deputy Advoeate G^nera! with Ajay Dwivedi, PanetLawyerfortherespondents/State. .'!; : ..-.•' ORDH% . ! • / (Passed on 12'" of October, 2006) The briginal application was filed before the State Administrative Triburial, Bench at Raipur, impugning the transfer order dated 26-12-2001t |(Annexure A-1),whereby the petitioner, wtio was working on the posl|ofAssistantF'rafess6ratGovefnmentChhatl:isgarh College, Raipur,wastransferredtotMeGovemmenfCollege,Katiker. 2. Whilel admitting the petition.i the Tribunal, by its order dated 8-1-2002, granted stefa^ guowith regartfto the posting petitioner as on 27-12-2U31. Leamed counse! for the petitioner subroifs that by virtue of the interim oreler^the petitiorier is continuing g- sartte place of ppsting, i.e., GoyernmentChhattisgarh Gollege, Rajpiar. :i3.\^ WayloT i ^ a ^^cg;fec^jK^^jtiDnef:;hasgottHeflnal :jlSS.^llsHKliK,t3;;iK'^i^i^:4;i!^li::::^'.41::^ int^i-tn'r^ordi^andiStRggj>etiti^n;8r|y|ias^ee!n,:|}n|t(ieji:same' of ttie on i the Hss iil1il :1':j Vi!t iilll •'llllj ^^; :'••:'.' i':r^j Wi 11111 .more than four^years. The petitiona- couldnot oontjnue at: an6 •forever. , :; ' '' : ' • " ; : ' : " . • : 4. Itis well settled principle of law that transfer is an;ineicient ofServiceanditisftirtheemployertodeeideastowhereapartiiBUla^ ^certempl^^B&.postedkeeRjng?in;vii8wipubli^i administrative exigehcy. This Goyrt:has Ijrruted jurisdiction to intei'l^re with thetransfeHrnattei^iandthjs,C%EirtcaBinferfereonlywith^W of proved mate gcte, non-compelence ef autHOrity passing the trans|fer order and transfer order not being in conformity with the ryles fand regulations. In the facts and cireymstahces of the case, it is; ret necessary to examine validity^ of fHe tranSter order at tKis {slagel Howeye^ithe res(5<^dents - aiii^otffies^re <^ Cotnplianc^^;|ffiaisi^pugflect?;1ransferS orderi d^ :(Annexyre:A-1),;^^ .•-. ' , „:, .: ", . : : ' : : ;.'r.':''^ 5. Thispietition has Beeome infructuouswith the passage,of time. AccQrdingly, the petition lis';yismissed as; having fbeeo^ infructuous. Howsver, the respondents —authoritiesareat libettyitej pass appropriatejoraer for posting 11-je petitioner in pyblic interest ancl administrativeexj^ncyjn acco['dgr!c&a/itljitaw.;Nobrderasto|eosts. illl' r:;.:::t.' &'':l. IJ^ '••^[s- -f m. KS Sd/- Satfsh K. AgoihotFi Judge i;^ ';t%,^ v»