"^.•.. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATyRE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. No. 3^;S /2011 "t /t ^A APPLICANT \'€-^0 >^<0^' -:^>:""' €^> v^""" NON-APPLICANT : Rukmani Khunte aged about 45 years, Widow of Late Rameshwar Khunte, R/o Village Chhote Atarmuda, Raigarh, Tahsil & District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS Pallav Gangopadhyay aged about •^£.Years S/o Shambhunath Gangopadhyay, R/o Village Chhote Atarmuda, Raigarh, Tahsil & District Raigarh (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF THE WRIT PETITION (227) No. 1021/2011 (RUKMANI KHUNTE VERSUS PALLAV GANGOPADHYAY) 3^'^TfN^' T^ ^8H S^T^I^HW V Sahu i^n '€^ftIWi,t^T^: A.l... T^^ (^?g^?) ^^T^R'H^^IT^I S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Aaa 24.05.2011 Shri Anil Kant Gupta, Advocatf^ for the applicant. Heard on IA No. 1 , applicatiorj application. On due consideration, 1 am ^ succeeded in explaining the delaj therefore the application is allowed atid Heard on application for restoijation ofW.P (227) No. 1021/2011. Learned counsel appearing counsel for the petitioner coufd mistake, therefore, WP(227) No. 1 28.04.2011, may be restored to its ori On due consideration, 1 am has succeeded in explaining the c application is allowed and W.P (22 original file. A copy of this order be placec| same be listed for hearing after two v^ ^r^^N ^rm^ ^ fe^t Tf^K ^ rwal for condonation of delay in filing the -atisfied that counsel for applicant Is ^ caused in filing the application, deiay is condoned. jfor the applicant submits that the r|ot appear on account of bonafide P21/2011, which was dismissed on tginal file. s^tisfied that the counsel for applicant ^use of his absence, therefore, the f) No. 1021/2011 is restored to its on record of the original fjte and the feeks—— Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge