THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1281 OF 2009 6TH OCTOBER, 2009 BETWEEN: VEMURI VENKATA NARASIMHA SASTRY .. PETITIONER AND V.V.S.N.L.PRASANNA AND OTHS .. RESPONDENTS THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1281 OF 2009 O R D E R: 1. This Criminal Revision Case is directed against the order dated 22-6-2009 passed in M.P.No.14 of 2009 in M.C.No.54 of 2002 on the file of Family Court, CCC, Secunderabad. The order impugned in the revision reads as under: “ Both parties present. At the request of respondent, respondent is directed to execute personal bond for his appearance and also for the arrears of amount to be paid 13.7.2009. Office Note: The respondent left the court without executing the personal bond as directed by the court. As per the office notice the respondent without executing the personal bond has left the court. Hence, issue Non Bailable Warrant against the respondent. Call on 13.7.2009.” 2. Crl.M.P.No.1554 of 2009 is filed for dispensing with the certified copy of the impugned order. The following order came to be passed on 13.7.2009: “ Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he applied for certified copy of the impugned order, but the same was not yet ready and hence he filed the present petition to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the impugned order. Neither copy of the order nor certified copy against which the revision is preferred is filed into court, the question of dispensing with does not arise. Hence, the petition is dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he applied for certified copy of the impugned order on 23.6.2009 itself, but he could not get the same till date. In the circumstances, the trial Court is directed to furnish the copy of the same within two days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Post after one week.” Subsequently, Crl.M.P.No.1554 of 2009 came to be ordered on 30.7.2009. On 31.7.2009 notice before admission came to be ordered while granting interim stay of execution of NBW for two weeks vide Crl.M.P.No.1754 of 2009. Subsequently, the interim order granted on 31.7.2009 came to be extended for four more weeks on 17.8.2009 and 11.9.2009. 3. When the revision came up for admission, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the main revision itself. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that 1st respondent received the maintenance amount by way of garnishee order prior to her filing M.P.No.14 of 2009 and therefore no amount is required to be paid by the petitioner. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent submits that the petitioner having left the court without executing the personal bond does not deserve for any relief in the revision. 6. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner paid maintenance amount @ Rs.4,000/-, as ordered by the civil court. 7. A fact remains that the petitioner has to pay maintenance to the 1st respondent at the rate of Rs.5,000/- per month as per order passed in M.C.No.54 of 2002. Even if the petitioner paid Rs.4,000/- per month still he has to pay the balance of Rs.1,000/- per month. 8. Considering the facts and circumstances, the revision is disposed of by recalling the NBW issued against the petitioner subject to the petitioner depositing Rs.12,000/- (Rupees twelve thousand only) within two weeks from today, failing which the NBW shall hold good. After making deposit of Rs.12,000/- the petitioner can file his objections for the amounts claimed by 1st respondent in M.P.No.14 of 2009. Thereupon, the learned Judge of the Family Court, CCC, Secunderabad has to consider the objections of the petitioner to be filed within two weeks from today and pass appropriate orders. 6th October, 2009. (B.Seshasayana Reddy,J) tnb cc two days. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1281 OF 2009 6TH OCTOBER, 2009