IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25421 of 2010 SURENDRA PASWAN son of late Nanhku Paswan---------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 13.8.2010 Heard Learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner along with family members of Putul Devi is alleged for kidnapping complainant’s son. While submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that Putul Devi was tortured at complainant and her family members hand. She was ousted from the house and to make a defence this complaint petition is filed in which also there is no even indication that petitioner has any hand in kidnapping. He is only alleged for having relation with Putul Devi earlier to her marriage. Otherwise also there can be no kidnapping on paper, remaining of the victim to his village could be verified by I.O., but no F.I.R. is lodged rather complaint is filed. If that is believed prima facie basing statement of interested witnesses, refusal of anticipatory bail of the petitioner is not justified. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Jamui, in connection with Complaint Case no.572C of 2009 ,subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh,J )