1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9388 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.953 OF 2004 Santosh s/o Babanrao Malsatwad .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents Mr.A.S.Golegaonkar, Advocate for applicant Mr.S.K.Tambe, A.G.P. for respondents 1, 3 and 4 Mr.P.S.Patil, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND N.D.DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 12th July 2010 PER COURT : 1. At the outset, Mr.Golegaonkar, learned Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant does not press for the relief at prayer clause (C) and prays for liberty to urge for early hearing after the amendment is carried out. Civil Application dismissed insofar as prayer clause (C) is concerned with the liberty as prayed for. 2. By this application, the applicant seeks leave to amend the petition as per the proposed amendment disclosed in the application. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties and for the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed and the applicant is permitted to amend the petition as per the proposed amendment. Amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today. ( N.D.DESHPANDE, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) (vvr/55.09lpa)