IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 1628 of 1999 Between: N.Dilder Basha, S/o. N.Ali Saheb. S.T.S.N.Degree College, Kadiri, Anantapur. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Pricipal, S.T.S.N. College, Kadiri, Anantapur District. 2 The Commissioner of Collegiate Education, State of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The A.P.Administrative Tribunal, Rep By Its Registrar. Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order of the A.P.Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.8507/98 dated 08/12/1998 is illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to continue the petitioner in service as Part time lecturer in Political Science (Urdu Medium) pending consideration of petitioner case for regularisation as per order of A.P.Administrative Tribunal dated 1/11/1998 in O.A.No.660/1998 by paying minimum scale of pay and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.R.N.HEMENDRANATH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY W.P.No.1628 of 1999 ORDER: (Per Ghulam Mohammed, J) This writ petition is filed against the order dated 8.12.1998 in O.A.No.8507 of 1998 whereunder the O.A. was admitted and notices were issued to the respondents returnable in four weeks to enable the Government Pleader to file counter affidavit. It is seen from the impugned order that the issues involved in the O.A. have not been adjudicated on merits and notices have been issued to the official respondents therein to afford opportunity to file a counter affidavit. Inasmuch as there is no final adjudication on merits and since the matter is seized by the Tribunal, we are not inclined to entertain this writ petition. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed. However, the Tribunal is directed to dispose of the O.A. as expeditiously as possible. No order as to costs. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED,J _______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY,J 23-01-2009 Stp ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RAGHU}