CRM No. M 37130 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 37130 of 2010 Date of decision: 03.02.2011 Anita and ors. ........ Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. S A Rajput, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Sidarth Sarup, DAG, Haryana for the respondent State Mr. Chander Has Yadav, Advocate for respondent No. 3 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of FIR No. 106/2010 dated 09.06.2010 under Sections 363, 366, 34 IPC registered at P S Kasola, District Rewari, Haryana. Reply has been filed. Para 2 of the preliminary submissions of the reply reads as under:- “That the present petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that the cancellation report dated 30.12.2010 has already been submitted to the Court of CRM No. M 37130 of 2010 2 competent jurisdiction in view of the statement of prosecutrix Anita Kumar d/o Kishan Lal as recorded by the Court of Shri Ishwar Dutt Sharma, learned Judicial Magistrate, Rewari, on 23.11.2010 as per the provisions of under Section 164 Cr.P.C and hence the present petition seeking quashing of present FIR has virtually become infructuous. In view of the fact that cancellation report is being filed, the present petition is rendered infructuous and disposed of as such. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 03.02.2011 mohan