IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 18193 of 2010 M/s Pawan Poultry Farm .....Petitioner VERSUS State Bank of India ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Ankit Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. Dheeraj Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.C. Pathela, Advocate for the respondent. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. On 11.10.2010, the case was adjourned on the request made by counsel for the respondent. However, the petitioner was restored possession of Poultry farm subject to deposit of ` 5 lacs. This restoration of possession was subject to further directions to be issued by the Court on the subsequent dates. On 01.11.2010, it was pointed out that the order has not been complied with by the petitioner. Overdue amount had been ` 36 lacs. Again opportunity was given to the petitioner to deposit sum of ` 5 lacs. The counsel for the petitioner prayed for some more time on 03.12.2010 as the order was not complied with. While giving last opportunity, the case was adjourned to 14.12.2010. Still, further adjournment was granted for today but the order has not been complied with. Obviously, the petitioner was only interested in getting interim order is not prepared to discharge his liability. He has not complied with the directions despite number of opportunities. No case for any interference in the case as such is made out. Dismissed. March 23, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE