1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.452/2008. IN S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.1586/2002. Kailash Chand Sharma. VERSUS Shyam Sunder Agarwal. 18.02.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Sanjay Joshi, for the petitioner. Mr.Narendra Mishra, for the respondent. ***** Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have complied with the terms and conditions contained in the order dated 11.10.2007 passed by this court and hence, this contempt petition may now be consigned to record. Before this court, it has been admitted by the learned counsel for the respondent Shyam Sunder Agarwal that an amount of Rs.3,25,850/- with interest @ 18% per annum, as directed under condition No.1 has been received by the respondent Shyam Sunder Agarwal, as stated by the learned counsel for the respondent Shri Mishra. In compliance of the condition No.2, the counsel for the respondent has handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the original document (Dastbardari) executed by Smt.Govindi Devi, Dinesh Chandra, Naresh Chandra and Sarlesh Kumari in 2 favour of Kailash Chandra to the learned counsel for the petitioner, a copy of the document which has been handed over to the counsel for the petitioner has been placed on record by the learned counsel for the parties along with receipt thereof executed by Shri Sanjay Joshi, Advocate, counsel for the petitioner. In further compliance of the directions of this court, a hand written note, written by the respondent Shyam Sunder Agarwal which was in the possession of the petitioner has been handed over to the counsel for the respondent by the learned counsel for the petitioner. A photostat copy of the same has been placed on record along with the forwarding letter and receipt executed by Shri Narendra Mishra, counsel for the respondent. Both the documents along with their forwarding letters and receipts be kept on record. These have been signed/initialed by the Court Master. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of the document (Dastbardari), the respondent had got a document titled “Byajrahannama” registered with the Sub Registrar, Jaipur on 12.02.1988. In view of the fact that the matter has now been resolved and the original document (Dastbardari) has been returned to the petitioner by the respondent, the respondent has undertaken to get the document dated 12.02.1988, the “Byajrahannama”, canceled with the Sub Registrar, Jaipur. For this purpose, the expenses 3 for the preparation of the document and stamps for cancellation of the said document shall be borne by the petitioner, as agreed, and the petitioner would give a notice for the appearance before the Sub Registrar, Jaipur to the respondent for execution of the same. A copy of the notice may also be sent through the counsel for the respondent by the petitioner informing him the time and place for the execution of the document for cancellation. In the event of such notice being given, the learned counsel for the respondent submit that the respondent undertakes to appear before the Sub Registrar, Jaipur for the purposes of execution of the document for cancellation. This contempt petition is disposed of as above and the notices are discharged. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.