IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-3628 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 16.8.2011 Bharpur Singh and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Mr.S.S.Gill, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, DAG, Punjab for respondents No.1 to 5. Mr.Chanan Singh, Advocate for respondents No. 6 to 12. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The contention of the petitioners that the statement of the injured was not recorded has been found to be baseless as per the case file which has been perused by this Court. It has also been brought to the notice of this Court that it was a case of free fight where the petitioners and their accomplices were also involved but after the investigation some of the persons named by both the parties were let off while some are being subjected to law. Having regard to the facts in totality, I am of the opinion that the grievance of the petitioners is misconceived. In case some other persons were involved and have not been arrayed as accused by Crl.Misc.No.M-3628 of 2011 (O&M) -2- the State, the petitioners have the remedy to raise a question of their complicity at the appropriate stage before the trial court. The explanation of ASI Paramjit Singh and ASI Sewa Singh is accepted and the rule is discharged. The petition stands disposed of. 16.8.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss