IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS.V AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 740 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 07/05/2008 in WP NO : 10604 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Nirmala Anand Kerur W/o. Late Sri Anand Kerur R/o Flat No.10, Jailakshmi Apartments, 22-118-1, R.K. Nagar Malkajgiri, Hyderabad - 500047. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The Federal Bank Ltd. Rep. by Authorised Officer Sri C.G. Kuriakose Regional Office, 123/107, 2nd Main Road, 27th Cross, 7th Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore - 560082. 2 The Federal Bank Ltd. Rep. by Branch Manager Sri. Harish Secunderabad Branch, Opp: Manju Theatre, Secunderaba - 500 003. 3 The Federal Bank Ltd. Rep. by its Chairman & Managing Director Registered Office : Aluva, Ernakulam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.THOMAS GEORGE Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.GOPALA KRISHNA MURTHY The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per Anil R. Dave, CJ) Heard the learned Advocates. Looking to the peculiar facts of the case and more particularly when the appellant widow is having only one property wherein she is staying, we think it proper to modify the interim order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 7-5-2008 in W.P.No. 10604 of 2008 by substituting the order, which had been passed by this Court in this appeal on 22-7-2008. It has been submitted that in pursuance of the order passed by this Court on 22-7- 2008, a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- has already been deposited by the appellant in Federal Bank Ltd., on 1-8-2008. Learned Advocate appearing for the respondent-Bank admits that in fact, Rs.1,50,000/- has been deposited by the appellant. In view of the substitution of the order dated 22-7-2008 for the interim order passed by the learned Single Judge, nothing survives in the appeal. The appeal stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. The learned Single Judge shall proceed further with the petition in accordance with law. ______________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 12th August, 2008. _____________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J GRR