<n .s"^ ^^^^^^. a^'^^^^i IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP.S.No. t^~1'5 /2007 PETITIONER ...•" ^> Nand Ram Jangade, S/o Shri Keshaw Ram Aged 39 years,Working as U.D.T. (Tribal Depat.) at Govt. Middle School Saraphkombo, Distt- Jashpur ( C.G.) ,^%/- >^p^' .•<- ';\l ^y VERSUS €/y '^y IESPONDENT: c' l^" ^ufc 1. State ofC.G. Through. Secretary, Tribal welfare Dipartment, MantralayaD.K-S. Bhawan, Raipur ( C.G.) 2. Commissioner, Tribal welfare Department, ptR.8S. University Campus Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3. Asst. Commissioner, Tribal welfare Department, Distt- Raigarh. ( C.G.) Hnt '^..i^f^f- i*!l ^^s^i^'"'...^ s ^^ I,—ii^-S5S3ca<asj,^lf PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226OTLTHE^CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPRQPRLATE WRITS OF MANDA- MUS AND CERTIORARI AND FQROTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS :- '9A : BILASPUR HON'BLE MR. SATI8H K. AGNIHOTM, J. 'a'f'^'A.T ^'c1' W SS) f 07, Petitioner Versus Resoondents State ofChhattissarh & Others Present: Shri Amit Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Goveniment Advocaie for die State/resnondents. 9th ofMarch, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing fbr the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working as Upper Division Teacher. The petitioner obtained B.Ed, Examination certificate on 14.08.1992. on his own expenses. 2, Leamed counsei appearing for the petitionCT subraits that the auestion mvolved. herein a.sto whether the teacher. who obtained B.Ed. E.xamination on his own exnenses. is entitled to two advance mcrements. 3. Accordins to learned counsel for the netitioner. the netitioner is •'s entitled to two advance inc.rsments in view ofthe decisaon ofth.is Court in the case of Yashwant Knmar dwai Vs. ^ -2- Mumcipal Corporatioii, Diu-g and another {2006 (II) MPJR- CG 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra); came to \"~~ "v-i-"—/ the conclusion tb.at the teachers. who liad obtaiaed B. Ed. ,/B.T.I: s'^..'.xamination Certificate on their own exoenses. are covered bv Ehe circular dated 24,12-98 issued bv tfae State Govemnient of Madhva Pradesh. Leamed counsel for the oetitioEer further submits that the facts snd auestion of l&w involved in the oresent case are sauarelv covered bv decision of this Coyrt in tb-e case of Yas another (Supra), to which leamed counsel appearing for the resoondents fairlv concedes and asrees with the averment mads bv learaed couasel aooearing for the netitioner. A.ccordinslv. the wri.t netition i.s allowed in terms ofthe order '-W-J S nassed in the case of Yashwant Kiimai' Bharadwai Vs, acinal Corooration. Diirg and an' (Supra)- subject to s A ^ ^ verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed, Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 & 1 .1.1999 and fiirther ·whetb.er hs has been oaid two advance jncrements or not. No ord.er a.s to costs, Amit Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge