HIGH CQUET Ci: C§€HATT1§GI§RH {AT $§L£§¥3UR Crimmai Ravigiag No.1§2~af 25% M {Clfiminai revision under Section 3Q? read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminai Precedure, 1873} " ‘ g FreseWi': None for the aepiicant. e None for the non‘appiicant. Sinaie Eench: Honsbie Mn TP. Sharma, J. oRAL 0mg? (Passed on 23f“ August, 2008) 1.. i have ,oerused the petition and the order impugned. 2. None one appears on behaif of the parties. No representation is made. 3. The appiicant has taken various grounds in the petition. 4. This petition is dirested against the otder dated 17111-290!) passed by the 15‘ Auditlona! Sessions Judge. Durg, in Criminai Revision No.253/99. Vioie the impugned order iearned Additionai Sessions Judge has directed that the nonu appiicant is entitied to take the custody of her minor daughter Kum. Namrata Shah. The triai Court is empowered under Sections 397 8: 399 of the CrPC. ' to pass such order. i do not find any iiiegaiity or infirmity in the order impugned. U5. The revision is iiabie to be dismissed and it is aooordingiy, dismissed. 6. Consequentiv, i.A.No.857/2OGO stands disposed of. rez’ // _ p. Sdl’ Shawna JudQe /’ Soma i , .W—T. AWPLICANTI: Diiip 80m, 24 yrs; Sfo $hri Manqaimurii (Re‘saccndem befe‘re $cai, E“: ShE‘Jagi Hagar, ?§iurd§h, PS. me Ceun beiow’) Mohan Nagar, Tah. Ea 918i Durg. Ve¥sus NON-APPLICANTI: Smt. Nayna Shah 45 yrs” W/o Late ’,%h¥§cant \ kw befcre the Ra§esh Shah, Ric QrNoCH 166, “ Coyr‘t beiow) Aditya Nagar, Behind Housing Board ‘ ‘ Celeny, Burg, Tah. & Disit. Burg.