THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Civil Revision Petition No.2262 of 2009 ORDER: Aggrieved by the order dated 02.04.2009 passed in I.A.No.499 of 2008 in O.S.No.1068 of 2001 on the file of the IV Additional Senior Civil Judge’s Court (Fast Track Court), Ranga Reddy District, the petitioner filed the present civil revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petitioner herein laid the suit O.S.No.1068 of 2001 before the Court below, against the respondents herein, seeking a preliminary decree for partition of the suit schedule property and allotment of 1/16th share to him out of the share of defendant No.1. When the suit was at the stage of arguments, he filed the present petition I.A.No.499 of 2008 praying the Court below to summon the copy of the partition deed dated 17.03.1974 and Memorandum of Understanding dated 15.04.1974 from the file of the Mandal Revenue Officer, Malkajgiri, Ranga Reddy District, for the purpose of comparison of signatures thereon with the signatures available on partition deed dated 06.05.1965, marked as Ex.B36 in the suit. Defendant No.10 resisted the said petition by filing counter. The Court below, after detailed consideration of the matter, dismissed the petition, by the order under revision, aggrieved by which the present civil revision petition is filed. Heard the learned counsel on record and perused the order under revision and other material made available on record. A perusal of the record reveals that the petitioner, at the time of filing of the suit in the year 2001, did not file the original partition deed dated 17.03.1974, on which he is relying, and when he was questioned on this aspect in his cross-examination as P.W.1, he could not say as to why he did not file the original document and as to who scribed that document. However, after completion of his cross- examination, in the year 2006, he sought to file the said document along with petition in I.A.No.978 of 2006 praying the Court below to receive the said document on record and mark the same. By reason of the order dated 18.12.2006, the Court below rejected the said petition and aggrieved thereby the petitioner filed civil revision petition in C.R.P.No793 of 2007 before this Court, which was also dismissed on 12.11.2007, for the reason that the suit is of the year 2001 and the main document was sought to be filed when the trial is in process, after cross-examination of P.W.1. In that view of the matter, when the original document itself was not allowed to be received on record, the question of summoning the copy of the very same document from the file of the Mandal Revenue Officer would not arise. So far as summoning the Memorandum of Understanding dated 15.04.1974 is concerned, it is to be seen that either in the plaint or in the deposition of the plaintiff as P.W.1, there is no mention about that document and thus no purpose would be served by summoning the said document, particularly when the suit, which is of the year 2001, is at the stage of arguments. For the reasons aforementioned, I am of the considered opinion that the petition was filed only to drag on the proceedings at the stage of arguments and the Court below has rightly dismissed the same by the order under revision, which needs no interference by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The civil revision petition is devoid of merit and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 23rd April, 2010 IBL