CRM- M 32649 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M 32649 of 2011 Date of decision : December 15, 2011 Parmod, ...... Petitioner v. State of Haryana, ...... Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Surinder Dagar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in case FIR No.85, dated 1.3.2011, registered under Sections 342, 376, 506 of the IPC, at Police Station Saran, District Faridabad. On 31.10.2011, the following contention was noticed :- “ Learned counsel has argued that a perusal of the record would show that the allegations against the petitioner have been trumped up and at the worst it is a case of consensual sex though even that cannot be said to be proved and that the petitioner has been in custody since 3.3.2011.” Counsel for the respondent has sought to argue that the assertions made by counsel for the petitioner are not borne out from the record. CRM- M 32649 of 2011 ::2:: However, on a complete conspectus of the facts and the admission of counsel for the respondent that the petitioner has now been in custody since 3.3.2011, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner. Bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, Faridabad. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) December 15, 2011. JUDGE `kk'