IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 4TH AUGUST 2011 / 13TH SRAVANA 1933 OP (DRT).No. 2079 of 2011(O) ------------------------------------ SA.23/2009 of DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER -------------- SHAJI P.JOHN, S/O.P.S.JOHN, AGED 51 YEARS, RESIDING AT KIZHAKKEDATH PUTHEN VEEDU, KADAPPRA, MANNAR.P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.P.K.RAMKUMAR SMT.A. ANITHA RAMKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. ALSTAR METAL COMPANY PVT.LTD., MARKET JUNCTION, MANNAR-689 622, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR P.A.AZEEZ KUNJU. 2. P.A.AZEEZ KUNJU, S/O.ASSANAR KUNJU, KOLLEZHA MADOM, MANNAR-689 622. 3. HOWA BEEVI, WIFE OF AZZEZ KUNJU, KOLLEZHA MADOM, MANNAR-689 622. 4. STATE BANK OF INDIA, THIRUVALLA MAIN BRANCH, THIRUVALLA-689 101. 5. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER,STATE BANK OF INDIA, THIRUVALLA MAIN BRANCH, THIRUVALLA-689 101. 6. THE BANKS DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, (KERALA & LAKSHADWEEP BENCH) AT ERNAKULAM, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SMT. SMITHA VINOD THIS OP (DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs O.P.(DRT). NO. 2079/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NO.24933/10 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O.P. (DRT) No.2079 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed this writ petition complaining that the Debts Recovery Tribunal has not issued certified copy of the judgment in S.A. No.23 of 2009 to enable the petitioner to file appeal against that order and at the same time further proceedings are initiated by the Bank against the petitioner. Now the counsel for the petitioner submits that, pursuant to the interim orders, certified copy has been issued by the DRT on 20.7.2011. The petitioner submits that in order to enable the petitioner to file appeal and seek interim orders, the interim orders passed by this Court may be kept alive for some more time. The counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner is abroad. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to see that further proceedings initiated by the bank is kept in abeyance for a period of one O.P. (DRT) No.2079 of 2011 -2- week to enable the petitioner to file appeal and seek interim orders. Sd/- S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE //True copy// P.A. TO JUDGE shg/