S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.5369/2006 Date : 06.12.2006 HON'BLE MR. SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. Sandeep Mehta for the applicants. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor for State. I have heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. The contention of learned counsel for the applicants is that on exactly same allegation accused applicants were arrested in FIR No.25/2001 of the Excise Department. The above fact has not been controverted by the learned Public Prosecutor. I have considered the submissions made before me. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the present case, I deem it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail to the applicants. Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest of applicants (1) Amba Ram s/o Dana Ram (2) Bhanwar Singh s/o Jai Singh (3) Devi Singh and (4) Anil Kumar s/o Raghunath by I.O./S.H.O.in FIR No.181/2001 P.S. Raipur, District Pali, they shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- alongwith two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of Investigating Officer on the following conditions:- (i)That they shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii)That they shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and; (iii)That they shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. vij