ii ljuuAwiliu c.. COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT DIVISION BENCH HON'BLE GUPTA, CJ. & HON'BLE RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J. MJsc. Appeal No. 5S2 of 2003. Ciaiamnt Respondents 1. 2. Mandkumar @ Nandkumar, aged 30 yrs., S/o Mehattar Satnami, R/o Viliage Koyalari, P.S. Kunda ^Tehsi! Pandaria, District Kawardha. Versus National Insurance Company Ltd., Through its Branch Manager, Raipur. Gurpai Singh, S/o Kuldeep Singh, R/o Main Road, Kawardha. MJsc. Appeal U/S 173 ofthe Motor Vehicie Act. Present: None for the appellant. (2Sth Aiigust, 2010) The foliowing oral order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta CJ: None for4he appeilant. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the appeilant, we are ieft with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. The appeai, therefore, is dismissed for wantotDrosecutlon. Sd/- Justice Sd/- R-N. Chandrakar Judge ^.