uHL &•» ^\ [GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3878of2007 ^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Rai Singh Maiko, Son of Shri R.N.Marko, aged 48 yeare, Deputy Raager, Forest Departaent Kofandara, Bilaspur Forest Range, District Bilaspur (C.G.) R/o. Gayavihar, Sarkanda, Tahsil and Distriet Bilaspur (C.O.) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Throu^i Secretary, Dqiaitinetit of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raigur (C.O.) 2. Chief Conservator of Forest, Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.) 3. Conservator ofForest, Bilaspur Cirele, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Divisional Forest OSicer, Forest Diyision, Bilaspur (C.O.) 5. Sakliai'ani Koshale, Ratiger, Katghora Forest Korba(C.G.) WRrTPETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTUTION OF DMDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri. J. Present: Shri Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate forthe petitioner. Miss Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer fortfae State/respondents 1 to 4, ORALORDER (Passed on 22nd day of April, 2008) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that tfae relief prayed in this petition has been g-anted by the respondent authorities and as such, this petition has become infhictuous. Leamed counsel for the State/respondente 1 to 4 does not controvert fhe said submission. Accordingly, fhis petition is dismissed as having become infi-uctuous. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Aimt