IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 15TH JUNE 2007 / 25TH JYAISHTA 1929 RP.No. 144 of 2007(S) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.29861/2006 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/2ND RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------------------- SULOCHANA, W/. GANGADHARAN, AGED 67 YEARS, TC.43/1428, MUTTATHARA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.SABU S.(KALLARAMOOLA) RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER & 1ST RESPONDENT: ----------------------------------------- 1. SOPHIA RANI, D/O. KRISHNA VENI, RAILWAY QUARTERS NO.130B, THAMPANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. BAIJU GANGADHARAN, S/O.GANGADHARAN, THUMBOTTU VEEDU, TC.43/1428, MUTTATHARA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADV. SMT.K.KUSUMAM THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: KURIAN JOSEPH & K.PADMANABHAN NAIR,JJ. ----------------------------------------- R.P.No. 144 of 2007 in W.P(C)No.29861 of 2006 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of June, 2007 O R D E R Kurian Joseph,J. This is a petition to review the judgment dated 22-1-2007 in W.P (C)No.29861/2006. This court by the said judgment directed the Family Court to dispose of O.P.No.1810/2004 within a period of six months from the date of the judgment. It is brought to our notice that there were other litigations between the parties. It is now submitted that the cases are posted for joint trial. However, while pronouncing the judgment we were not told that there were other litigations between the parties. What the petitioner wanted is only an expeditious disposal of the matter. That is a matter the parties could have moved before the Family Court itself. In that view of the matter the review petition is allowed. The judgment dated 22-1-2007 in W.P(C)No.29861/2006 is recalled. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) (K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, JUDGE) ahg.