IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI TUESDAY, THE 28TH JUNE 2011 / 7TH ASHADHA 1933 RP.No. 457 of 2011 -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN MACA.1378/2010 Dated 16/03/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): APPELLANT:- -------------------------------- T.A.REJI, S/O.ALIAS, THEKKEKARAYIL HOUSE, EZHAKKARANADU SOUTH, KOLENCHERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.MUHAMMED SALAHUDHEEN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS:- --------------- 1. SHYNI THOMAS, AGED 27 YEARS, W/O.V.V.THOMAS, VAAKKANEDATH HOUSE, NEMBYARPADY, KADAMATTOM P.O., KOLENCHERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. ANIL.M.K., S/O.KUTTY, MUKKADAYIL HOUSE, EZHAKKARANADU SOUTH, KOLENCHERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., KOLENCHERY BRANCH, SANTHI PARK, KOLENCHERY P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: A.K.BASHEER & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= R.P. No. 457 of 2011 in M.A.C.A No. 1378 of 2010 =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= Dated this the 28th day of June, 2011 O R D E R Basheer, J. It is contended by the petitioner that there is no justification in imposing cost on him, while remitting the case to the Tribunal. It is further contended that the cost, at any rate, is on the higher side. 2. We are unable to agree. The petitioner was given an opportunity to adduce further evidence only, since we were satisfied that he deserves such an opportunity, but, of course on terms. Therefore, the review petition is liable to be dismissed and we do so. However, in view of the impassioned plea made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, time for deposit of the cost is enlarged till July 14, 2011 as a last chance. A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE. P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE. mn