IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5119 of 2009 SUNIL KUMAR SAH & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the petitioners : Mr. Raj Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the State: G.P.XVI 2 22/4/2009 It is the case of the petitioners that respondent no.10 Pramod Kumar was recommended to be removed from the post of Mukhiya by the District Magistrate, Samastipur (respondent no.5) in exercise of power conferred under section 18(5) of the Panchayat Raj Act, as contained in Annexure -8. If Annexure -8 is not implemented, it is for the petitioner to approach the Director, Panchayat Raj Department, Bihar, Patna (respondent no.3) for implementation of the same by filing a representation along with a copy of Annexure -8 and he being approached by the petitioner will consider the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law after giving notice to respondent no.10 Pramod Kumar s/o late Sital Rai, village – Jitwaria, P.S. Kalyanpur, District, Patna. It is made clear that without making any representation to the concerned authority in regard to 2 grievance, no writ application under public interest litigation can be filed. With the aforesaid observation, this application stands disposed of. Neyaz/ (J. B. Koshy, CJ.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)