IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Crl. Writ Petition No. 545 of 2008 Smt. Babita and another [ Petitioners ...…………. [ Versus S tate of Uttar akhand and others ...…………. Respondents Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Tanuj Semwal, Asstt. Govt. Advocate for the State. Mr. Atul Bahuguna, Advocate for the complainant. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing the first information report dated 27.06.2008, lodged by respondent No. 3, which is registered as Crime No. 131 of 2008, relating to offences punishable under Section 384, 385, 389, 500 of I.P.C., with Police Station Sahaspur, District Dehradun. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through the first information report and other papers on record, we are not inclined to interfere with the investigation. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed summarily. (Stay Application No. 4404 of 2008 also stands dismissed). (Dharam Veer, J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 18.07.2008 18.07.2008 H.Negi