IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 25TH AUGUST 2011 / 3RD BHADRA 1933 RP.No. 626 of 2011() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.22227/2011 Dated 16/08/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. THE TAHSILDAR, UDUMBAMCHOLA PIN 685 554. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER VILLAGE OFFICE CHINNAKKANAL, PIN 685 618. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI BY SPL.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SUSHELA BHATT RESPONDENT(S): --------------- JOY ENTERPRISES P.O.BOX NO.103, TB ROAD, THRISSUR 680 021 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR N.V.JOY. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: RP.626/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE-1 COPY OF THE MAHAZAR ANNEXURE-II, III, IV & V COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS. ANNEXURE-VI COPY OF THE RECEIPT. // True Copy // P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` R.P.No. 626 of 2011 in W.P.(C) No. 22227 of 2011 C ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 25th day of August, 2011 O R D E R ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ The respondents in W.P.(C) No.22227/2011 are the review petitioners. The writ petition was filed by the respondents herein, seeking to quash Ext.P26 order issued by the first petitioner, ordering resumption of the land mentioned therein. The writ petition was moved as a today moving item on 16.08.2011 and was disposed of, relegating the respondents herein to pursue appellate remedy available under Section 16 of the Kerala Land Conservancy Act. It was further directed that subject to the filing of the appeal, until its disposal, the petitioner shall not be evicted from the land. In this review petition, referring to the documents, annexed thereto, petitioners contend that by the time, judgment was rendered by this Court, the land was already resumed by them and Annexure-1 is the mahazar RP No.626/11 : 2 : mainly relied on in support of this contention. Having considered the contentions in the review petition and also the documents produced by the petitioners therein, I am inclined to think that, prima facie, there is substance in what is contended. Therefore, the review petition will stand allowed and the judgment disposing of W.P.(C) No.22227/2011 will stand recalled. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/25/08 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge