IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15393 of 2009 RUPNESHWAR SAH, son of late Baban Sah, resident of village-Dhamoun, P.S.-Patori, District-Samastipur-----------------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 4.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It is alleged by the complainant that defence raised by the petitioner is not tenable as in the present scenario there is no probability of changing a bride. But a divorce case is filed by the husband against the complainant more than six months earlier of the filing of the complaint case. For the cause of husband and wife petitioner is apprehending his arrest for the allegations leveled in the complaint petition which is, in my view also, not justified. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case no.325 of 2008, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Samastipur , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )