IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.9093 of 2007 Dated: 27.4.2007 Between: J.Anjaiah Chowdary. .... PETITIONER AND The Secretary, Managing Committee, Sir C.Ramalinga Reddy College, Eluru. West Godavari District and 2 others. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO. 9093 of 2007 Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Education and at their request, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. The case of the petitioner is that he passed B.P.Ed course in Physical Education during April, 1979 and pursuant to the notification dated 19.7.1983 issued by the respondent College for the post of Lecturer-cum-Assistant Physical Director, he applied for the post and was duly selected by the Selection Committee on 4.9.1983. Accordingly he was issued the appointment orders vide proceedings dated 5.9.1983 subject to the approval of the Governing Body of the Andhra University. It is stated that his appointment was also approved by the University vide proceedings dated 11.4.1985 along with others. While so, he was transferred to law college under the same management and one VSVS Bapuji was appointed as Physical Director in CR Reddy College during the year 1984 consequent on the resignation of one Sri V.Subba Rao, the then Physical Director. It is also stated that he was not given any opportunity for retransfer/repatriation to CR Reddy College and the Secretary to the Managing Committee of Sir CR Reddy College of Eluru issued proceedings dated 25.2.2005 seeking to retrench his services with effect from the afternoon of 31.5.2005 on the ground of fall of teaching work load necessitating closure of the institution and that the law college is an unaided institution. Aggrieved by the notice of retrenchment dated 25.2.2005, the petitioner made a detailed representation to the Government on 20.4.2005 and, in turn, the Government has sought for certain remarks from the respondent College in that regard. The grievance of the petitioner is that no orders have been passed on the said representation till now. Hence this writ petition. Since the petitioner has already appealed to the Government against the impugned retrenchment orders, without going into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent – Principal Secretary to Government to dispose of the appeal/representation of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 27.4.2007 msv