IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6356 of 2009 VIPIN KUMAR CHOUDHARY & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 20.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The issue relates to a claim to be considered for appointment on the post of Prakhand Teacher/Panchayat Teacher on the basis of training certificate obtained from Gandhi Hindi Vidyapith, Prayag at Allhabad in Baby Teacher Certificate course. Reliance is placed on an order of this Court in CWJC No. 469 of 2009 and analogous cases disposed on 13.4.2009. Counsel for the State invites the attention to paragraph 4 of the aforesaid order, which reads as follows : “It is submitted that the petitioners held the qualification of B.T.C. (Baby Teachers Certificate) from Gandhi Hindi Vidyapith, Prayag at Allahabad. They obtained this qualification much prior to 17.8.1995, the date of coming into force of the NCTE Act. It is their case that they are being wrongly denied consideration for appointment on basis of an ill founded premise that the Institution was a fake Institution as per the notification alleged to be published by the University Grant Commission.” He submits that such consideration has to be confined only to those who obtained the aforesaid qualification 2 prior to 17.8.1995. Learned counsel for the State is correct in his submission. Once the Court has decided an issue of law, the Respondents are required to consider any representation by those who claim to be covered by the same order without waiting for them to obtain individual orders from the Court as held today in CWJC No. 6353 of 2009. The writ application is disposed with direction to the Respondents to examine the claim of the petitioners to be covered on an issue of law in CWJC No. 469 of 2009 and analogous cases. If they are satisfied that the petitioners are covered by the same, they shall be required to accord similar treatment. If the Respondents propose to hold that they are not covered by the same, they shall be required to furnish reasons to them for the same. Thereafter, the Respondents shall be obliged to pass a reasoned and speaking order displaying application of mind, setting out grounds of difference of opinion, so that judicial review, if occasion arises, shall be facilitated. Let a copy of this order be also sent to the Chief Secretary of the State of Bihar in like terms as CWJC No. 6353 of 2009. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)