IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3445 OF 2005 Shri Nimraj Pandharinath Vispute . .. Petitioner. vs. Mrs. Hemlata Limbraj Vispute .. Respondent. Dr. V.K. Choudhari for petitioner. CORAM : S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 20th December, 2005. P.C.: . The present petition challenges the maintenance granted to the respondent wife of Rs. 1500/- per month being interim maintenance and to two children of Rs. 4000/- per month i.e. Rs. 2000/- each. In my opinion, the said fixation of maintenance does not require any interference in view of the fact that the income of the petitioner which is set out in para 12 of the impugned order is Rs. 1,55,568 and Rs. 1,48,892 for the years 2000-2001 and 2001-2002. The monthly salary of the petitioner is Rs. 12,407/-. In that view of the matter the present fixation of the meagre amount payable to the wife and children does not require any interference. However, the learned counsel for 2 the petitioner states that the son has already attained majority. If it is so, it will be open for the petitioner to apply for variance of the amount in respect of the child who has attained majority and if such an application is made, the trial Court will consider and decide the same on its own merits. Petition disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs.