1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1092 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 2482 OF 2008 Smt. Priya Rahul Vyas .....Plaintiff Versus Mrs. Daksha Pradeep Vyas & Ors. .....Defendants Mr. J. S. Kini i/b. Mr. Suresh Dubey, Advocate for the Plaintiff. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATE : 18TH JANUARY, 2010. P.C. : The chamber summons is taken out by the Plaintiff directing the Defendants to give inspection of the original documents referred to and relied upon by them in their affidavit in reply to the notice of motion no.2925 of 2008. 2. By the letters annexed to Exhibit "A" and "B" to the notice of motion, the Plaintiff requested inspection of the above said documents. However, the Defendants neglected and failed to give inspection to the Plaintiff. Today also, none appears on behalf of the Defendants though a copy of the chamber summons is served upon their Advocates. In these circumstances, the averment made in affidavit in support to the chamber summons is presumed not to have been controverted by the Defendants. The chamber summons is therefore made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Sd/- (R. V. MORE, J.)