: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.428 OF 2007 Ravindra K. Dere ....Petitioner V/s. Chairman, Mr.Madan Bhosale & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.G .N. Salunke for the Petitioner. Mr.S.S. Pakale for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 31ST MARCH, 2008. P.C. : 1. It is true that the Petitioner is entitled to be reinstated in the same capacity in which he was employed earlier. It is also true that he is entitled to wages as specified in the order dated 26.3.2007 i.e. from the date the Labour Court held he was entitled to be reinstated. Pursuant to the order, the Respondents have in fact paid a sum of Rs.1,31,852/-. 2. If there is any dispute as to the quantum or as to the nature of the reinstatement, the Petitioner is always at liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings in accordance with law for enforcement of the said order. No action for contempt is called for at this stage. : 2 : 3. Mr.Pakale, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 to 3 states that the order of the Labour Court has been fully complied with. The statement is accepted. 4. The Contempt Petition is accordingly disposed of.