WP(C) 2716/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA (By Ranjan Gogoi, J.) Heard Mr. I. Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R. Adhika ri, learned Government Advocate, Assam. Perused the written instructions dated 23.5.2010 received by Shri R. Adh ikari, learned Government Advocate, Assam from the Superintendent of Police, Na gaon, which has been placed before the Court. The petitioner Musstt. Dilara Begum, claims to be an Indian citizen born and brought up in village Kapashbari, P.S. Murajhar in the District of Nagaon. According to the petitioner, she was born in the year 1970 to one Md. Samed Ali and Toira Bibi, who are Indian citizens. The petitioner got married in the year 1986 to one Md. Kamal Uddin. According to the petitioner, her husband was deport ed from India on 2.8.2008 and, thereafter, police personnel from the local polic e station have been visiting the house of the petitioner at odd hours causing mu ch annoyance to the petitioner and her family members. The petitioner has furthe r averred that the police personnel have made illegal demands on her which she h as not been able to satisfy on account of acute poverty. As a result, threat and intimidation have continued in the hands of the police personnel. Averments to the above effect have been made in paragraphs 12, 12, 14 and 15 of the writ peti tion. Having regards to the averments made, this Court by order dated 14.5.201 0 had sought a report from the Superintendent of Police, Nagaon. Pursuant to the said order of this Court, it appears that the Superintendent of Police had caus ed an enquiry to be made in respect of the allegations levelled by the petitione r and, thereafter, has sent the written instructions to Shri R. Adhikari, learne d Government Advocate, Assam for being placed before the Court. The said instruc tions communicated by the Superintendent of Police would indicate that an inquir y into the allegations levelled by the petitioner was carried out by the Additio nal Superintendent of Police (Headquarters), Nagaon. Such inquiries had revealed that the husband of the petitioner Md. Kamal Uddin was deported to Bangladesh i n the year 1998, but he had entered Assam illegally. Accordingly, he was pushed back to Bangladesh for the second time in the year 2000. However, the husband of the petitioner re-entered Assam and for the third time he was pushed back to Ba ngladesh on 3.8.2008. The report of the enquiry carried out by the Additional Su perintendent of Police (Headquarter) further indicates that intelligence reports have been received that the husband of the petitioner had once again come back to Assam for which reason on two different occasions i.e. on 22.7.2009 and 23.7. 2009 search were carried on the house of the petitioner. According to the Additi onal Superintendent of Police (Headquarters), apart from the two days, on no oth er occasion police personnel had visited the house of the petitioner. In the rep ort of the Additional Superintendent of Police (Headquarters), the allegations m ade by the petitioner with regard to threat, intimidation and demand for illegal gratification were specifically denied. On the basis of the said report, it app ears that the Superintendent of Police, Nagaon had passed orders informing the o fficer-in-charge and the staff of the local police station i.e. Murajhar Police Station, not to harass the petitioner and to refrain from visiting her house unl ess there is specific information with regard to the return of Md. Kamal Uddin i .e. the husband of the petitioner. We have considered the steps taken by the Superintendent of Police in th e light of the relevant facts and circumstances of the case. On such considerati on, we are of the view that the instructions/orders issued by the Superintendent of Police, Nagaon to the staff of the local police station not to harass the pe titioner and not to visit her house unless there is any specific information, ad equately takes care of the grievance of the petitioner as highlighted in the pre sent writ petition. The said instructions/orders issued by the Superintendent of Police will confer power on the staff of the local police station to carry out due investigation of the presence of Md. Kamal Uddin in the house of the petitio ner and at the same time will ensure that the petitioner is not harassed in any undue manner. In such a situation, we do not consider it necessary to pass any f urther directions in the matter and instead deem it appropriate to close this wr it petition on the basis of the orders/instructions issued by the Superintendent of Police, Nagaon, as stated in the letter dated 23.5.2010. Both the letter dat ed 23.5.2010 as-well-as the report of the Additional Superintendent of Police (H eadquarters) be kept on record to form a part of the records of this case. Writ petition shall stand disposed of in the above terms.