IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8923 of 2009 RAJ KUMAR BIND @ KAJU, SON OF NATHUN BIND, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KAYAM NAGAR, P.S. KOILWAR, DISTRICT BHOJPUR AT ARRAH …. PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Initially, the case was under Sections 498A, 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code but it is stated that cognizance has been taken only under Section 498A of the I.P.C. Petitioner is the husband of the victim lady. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was earlier on police bail and after submission of the charge sheet, he has been taken into custody. He submits that Bidagari was not being done by the side of the girl and, therefore, the father of the petitioner filed an informatory petition six months ago and thereafter notice was also sent to the father of the girl for her Bidagari but he refused to do so and in retaliation, he has filed this false case of demand of dowry. Considering the background of the case and the fact that the petitioner was earlier on police bail, the application is allowed. - 2 - Petitioner (Raj Kumar Bind alias Kaju) is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri B.N. Mishra, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Arrah in Tr. No.2754/08 arising out of Complaint Case No.500 ©/2007. B.T (J.N Singh, J)