IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12459 of 2009 LAL JI YADAV @ LAL JEE YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.13134 of 2009 Bhuttu Yadav @ Bhutu Yaddav Versus State of Bihar 3 3.7.2009 Both these cases are taken up together. The petitioners, Lal Ji Yadav @ Lal Jee Yadav is father-in-law and Bhuttu Yadav @ Bhutu Yadav is husband of the deceased. The informant alleges that her daughter, Sunita Kumari, was married to Bhuttu Yadav in the year 2004. Thereafter it is alleged that the accused persons tortured her for dowry. It is alleged that the accused persons burnt the victim lady and disposed of her dead body. The learned counsel submits that the allegations are false and, in fact, the victim is alleged to have died on 12th of July,2008 though she died on 11th of July,2008. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, namely, Bhuttu Yadav @ Bhutu Yadav, for the present. However, the petitioner, Lal Ji Yadav @ Lal Jee Yadav, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of C.J.M., Siwan, in Barharia P.S. Case No.65 of 2008. Anilkrsinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)