IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 11101 of 1998 Between: T.Harikishan Singh S/o.Late Sri T.Ratan Singh, Aged about 45 years, Occu:Project Officer, A.P.Vikalangula Co-op.Corporation, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER AND The A.P.Vikalangula Co-operative Corporation, rep.by its Managing Director, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or issue a writ particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring that the proceedings No.Notice/APVCC/Retr/98/D-1034, dt.2.2.1998, as illegal and to set aside the same, directing the respondent to continue the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.G.RAVINDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: MR.K.RAMANUJA CHARI The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed challenging the show-cause notice dated 02.02.1998 issued by the respondent Corporation calling upon the petitioner to explain as to why his services should not be terminated. Learned counsel for the respondent states that now the service conditions of the petitioner will be dealt with as per the G.O.Ms.No.28, dated 6.10.2000, as directed by this Court by an order dated 29.10.2004 in W.P.No.2643 of 2000 and Batch. In view of the above, the writ petition is closed and the respondent is directed not to dispense with the services of the petitioner, unless and until a final decision is taken with regard to the restructuring of the cadre strength as per G.O.Ms.No.28, dated 6.10.2000. No costs. _________________ 5th November, 2004. Pan To 1. The Managing Director, The A.P.Vikalangula Co-operative Corporation, Hyderabad. 2. Two C.Ds.