IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M- 35493 of 2010 Dhiraj Kumar & others .....Petitioners VERSUS State of Punjab and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. D.V. Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. A.S. Jattana, Addl. AG, Punjab, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The matter was referred to the trial Court recording the statement of the parties with regard to the compromise. One of the parties have not appeared and is seeking adjournments day after day. Under these circumstances, quashing on the basis of this compromise may not be considered as a party is not appearing to make statement. Counsel for the petitioners says that one of the accused was declared proclaimed offender and is now going to surrender before the Court. Let the said accused first surrender and submit himself to the jurisdiction of the Court. Such accused may not be entitled to be heard at this stage. If the parties have genuinely resolved their differences, then they may file a fresh petition on the basis of either earlier compromise or on the basis of fresh compromise. The present petition is, however, dismissed as not pressed. October 17, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE