IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19084 of 2008 RAM CHANDRA PRASAD SINHA, son of Late Ramprit Singh, resident of Harnaut near Old Mill, P.S. Harnaut, District Nalanda. ----Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The State Leprosy Officer, Sultanganj, Patna-6. 4. The District Magistrate, Nalanda. 5. The Civil Surgeon, Biharsharif, Nalanda. 6. The District Leprosy Eradication Officer, Nalanda. 7. The Director, Provident Fund, Bihar, Patna. 8. The District Provident Fund Officer, Nalanda. 9. The District Treasury Officer, Nalanda. 10.The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 15.10.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite his retirement about six years back, he has not been paid his provident fund dues till date as also certain dues on account of Assured Career Progression (ACP) and the revised pension. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State submits that in case the petitioner files a fresh representation with regard to the unpaid claims, the same would be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Civil Surgeon, Biharsharif, Nalanda (respondent no.5). In case such a representation is filed stating the 2 details of the unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, respondent no.5 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation, so that the unpaid claims could be settled without delay and admissible payment should be made to the petitioner with statutory interest. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)