1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6580 OF 2009 Shaymlal @ Shyamsingh B. Pardeshi .. Petitioner versus Charudatta Bhagwansingh Pardeshi (since deceased) through his legal heirs & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.R.S.Kadam for the petitioner. Mr.A.A.Garge for respondent Nos.1a to 1c, 4, 5 and 6. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 2nd September 2009. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1a to 1c and 4 to 6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the petitioner wants to examine Mr.Salim M. Khan, Chief State Examiner of Documents, Maharashtra State as his witness as the said witness has given report dated 29th September 2003. Considering the nature of the dispute in the suit, the petitioner deserves to be granted permission to examine the said person as a witness. In the circumstances, the prayers made in application at Exhibit 228 will not survive and it will not be necessary to interfere with the impugned order. 2 2. Hence, I pass the following order: : O R D E R : (a) The petitioner is permitted to examine as his witness Mr.Salim M. Khan, Chief State Examiner of Documents, Maharashtra State (referred to prayers made in application at Exhibit 228). (b) On a formal application made by the petitioner, the trial Court will issue witness summons to the said witness . (c) Subject to aforesaid direction, the impugned order is confirmed and petition is disposed of. (A.S.OKA,J)