IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.1175 OF 2008 1. SITA DEVI, WIFE OF LATE SURAJ NARAYAN SINGH 2. JYOTI NARAYAN SINGH, SON OF LATE INDERADEO SINGH BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE DUMRI GOBIND (CHOTKA BALUA), POLICE STATION PATAHI, DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN ……………………………………………………………………PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. GAJENDRA SINGH, SON OF LATE PALTAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DUWARI GOBIND (CHOTKA BALUA) POLICE STATION PATAHI, DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN ……………………………………………………………….OPPOSITE PARTIES ******** 4 07/04/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, the Opposite Party No. 2 and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed against the order dated 15.03.2007 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sikrahana at Motihari in Trial No. 353 of 2007. The Court has passed an order calling for the register which bears the LTI of Sita Devi for the purpose of having it examined by an expert, as the Court thinks that it would help the Court to reach to a “just decision” in the case. Considering the facts of this case, that there is a challenge to the LTI of Sita Devi and it is alleged that the LTI was not made in the Registry Office by Sita Devi, I think that the Court is perfectly justified in calling for the register. This application is thus dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)