HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU W.P. (227) No.2895 of 2010 PETITIONER: (DefendantNo.3) RESPONDENTS: (Plaintiffs) -Versus- 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Vikky Panjwani, S./o Kanyhaiyalal Panjwani, aged about 24 years, R/o Katoratalab, Shiv Mandir Gali, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (CG) Bharat Gala, aged about 43 years, Nitin Gala, agedabout48 years, Harish Gala, aged about 45 years, All S/o Shri Radha^ Ji Bhai Gala, All areR/o Badodara,Gujrat, All are through Mukthyar Shri Mangat Rai Jindal, S/o Shri P.C. Gupta, R/o M.G. Road, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur(CG) Anish Saha, aged abouf 38 years, S/o Shri Prem Ji Saha, R/o Mahaveer Colony, Telghani Naka, Raipur (CG) Rajesh Saha, aged about 45 years, S/o Shri Premji Saha, R/o M.J. Road, Raipur (CG) Present: i Smt. Anju Ahuja, counsel forthe petitioner. Sincile Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra. J. ORALORDER I (7-7-2010) 1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition and prayed for setting aside the order of Annexure-P/4 dat'ed 13-4-2010 whereby the application of defendant No.3 before thetrial Court under Order 18Rute 17 ofthe CPC for recalling the plaintiff and hiswitnesses' cross-examination on behalf of defendant No.3 hasbeen rejqcted. 2. I have heard learned counseli for the petitioner and perused the applicatjon under Order 18 Rule 17 of tthe CPC and l am of the opinion that the trial Court has not committed any illegality, infirmity or jurisdictional error in passing the impugned order warranting interference of this Court under Article 227 ofthe Constitutionjof India. 3. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Barve