1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 7643/2010 Smt Krishna sharma Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 20.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Dharmendra Pareek - for the petitioner Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is an innocent lady whose name was used by her husband Pankaj Sharma. All the business activities are looked after by husband under her power of attorney. Her husband is doing the business in the partnership of Babulal and Jagdish Kumawat. Petitioner undertakes not to allow anyone to do any business in her name. Her husband Pankaj Sharma is already behind bars. Looking to the aforesaid, petitioner may be granted bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. He submits that it is a serious matter as the accused are found involved in adulterating eatables specially vegetable oils and ghee. It has come on record that transactions used to be made by Pankaj Sharma and his partners under power of attorney given iby the petitioner. Hence, petitioner may not be granted bail. After considering rival submissions of the parties and 2 without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case that petitioner is a female and all the business activities were done by petitioner's husband Pankaj Sharma under her power of attorney and it has been undertaken by the petitioner that she will not allow her husband to use her name for carrying out any business, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and it is directed that accused-petitioner namely; Smt Krishna Sharma may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 249/2010 registered at Police Station – Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur for offence under Section/s 420, 272, 273 and 120-B IPC provided, she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for her appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma