IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15022 of 2005 JAGDISH MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 06/ 06.5.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Arrears of the terminal dues of the petitioner has already been paid, but the petitioner disputes the quantum of the amount paid as GPF dues, as according to him he was further entitled to be paid a sum of Rs. Two lacs and odd, but ignoring such request, only a sum of Rs. 91,000/- and odd has been paid. Let the petitioner file a representation before the Director, Provident Fund, Bihar, who should consider and dispose of the same by passing a reasoned order, as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of its receipt. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)