THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.P.No.20558 of 2010 Date: 27.08.2010 Between: Makkena Annapurnamma … Petitioner AND State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to Home Department, Secretatariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad, and 4 others … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.P. No.20558 of 2010 ORDER: The complaint of the petitioner in this case is that the authorities are insisting upon her forming a passage/cart-cum-tractor track through her land situated in Survey No.426/3C of Kondamuru Village, J. Panguluru Mandal, Prakasam District. She seeks a consequential direction to the respondents not to interfere in any manner with her possession over her land. It is her allegation that the authorities were insisting upon the formation of such passage at the behest of respondents 4 & 5. The Sub-Inspector of Police, J. Panguluru Police Station, Prakasam District, Respondent-2, filed a counter denying the allegations made by the petitioner. According to him, the Tahsildar, J. Panguluru, Prakasam District addressed letter dated 11.08.2010 requesting the police to act upon the temporary injunction order dated 31.01.2010 said to have been obtained by the fifth respondent in I.A.No.1217 of 1998 in O.S.No.260 of 1998 and provide police protection. The respondent-2 further stated that as the matter appeared to be a civil dispute and no specific direction was given by the Court with regard to providing police protection, no action was taken to oblige the request of the Tahsildar, J. Panguluru Mandal. He categorically stated that till date no police protection had been provided to the fifth respondent. Respondent-2 also asserted that no case has been registered or was pending against the petitioner and that in such a situation, the petitioner had neither been summoned nor visited by the police. In the light of the averments made by respondent-2 in his counter, it is manifest that the police are not interfering with the civil dispute, if any, between the petitioner and the respondents 4 & 5. No direction is required from this Court in such circumstances. The writ petition is accordingly closed with the above observations. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J Date: 27.08.2010 Isn