IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 46 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 11 OF 2011 SHRI JAYANT SHIVRAM KHANDEPARKAR AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus COMMUNIDADE OF USGAON REP. BY ITS ATTORNEY SHRI. ANAND PARAB ... Respondent Mr. R. G. Ramani, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. S.D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. Kankonkar, Advocate for Respondent No. 1. Coram:- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date:- 5th May, 2011 P.C.:- Heard learned Counsel, Mr. Ramani appearing on behalf of the Applicants and Mr. Lotlikar, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No. 1. The presence of other Respondents is not necessary at the hearing of this Application. 2. Perused the Application and the Decree that is passed and impugned in Second Appeal, which is admitted. The Judgment and Order passed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 91/2008 dated 26-08-2010, is that the Appeal of Appellant/Respondent No. 1, before the Court of Ad-hoc District Judge, is allowed. The Court below has not passed any Decree or Order, granting any relief in terms of the prayers in the suit. 3. In such circumstances, prima facie, there is substance in the contentions of Mr. Lotlikar that no order capable of being executed and implemented, is passed by the Lower Appellate Court. 4. In the light of the statement made by Mr. Lotlikar, nothing survives in this Application and it is disposed off. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. EV