1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.8370/2002. : : Kailash Chand Vs. Union of India & Ors. : : Date of Order 1.12.2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr.Suresh Kashyap for the petitioner. Mr.Tej Prakash Sharma for the respondent (s). Heard learned counsel for the parties. Grievance of the petitioner is that pension paid to him at the time of his discharge on medical grounds has not been correctly determined. Records of the Medical Board as also the various orders issued by the respondents merely suggest that Medical Board recommended that in view of the fact that the petitioner was discharged on medical grounds, he may be granted pensionary benefits. The respondents in reply to the writ petition has come out with the plea that pensionary benefits were granted to the petitioner under Rule 38 of CCS Pension Rules, 1972 and he was sanctioned monthly pension of Rs.435/- plus the usual allowances w.e.f. 9.5.1993 vide order dated 25.10.1993. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner has not able to point out that in what manner the pension has not been correctly determined. It appears that the respondents have failed to communicate the petitioner by giving the break up as to in what manner the pension @ Rs.435/- per month w.e.f. 9.5.1993 was arrived at and particulars of about the manner it has been revised upto this date following acceptance of recommendations of 5th and 6th pay commission. Consequently, this writ petition is disposed of. Such particulars shall be sent to the petitioner within a period of three months from the date copy of this order produced before the respondents. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/- Item No.13.