IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-1558 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: 29.03.2011 Reena Devi ..........Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..........Respondent BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. S.S. Mor, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. An application by post was received by this Court, which was treated as a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Notice of motion was issued on 18.1.2011. In response thereto, reply on behalf of respondent-State has already been filed and the same is on record. Learned counsel for the respondent-State on instructions from ASI Dinesh Kumar submits that action has been taken against the accused persons and all the six accused have been arrested. Learned counsel further submits that as far as grievance of the petitioner with regard to providing protection is concerned, one police official was sent to the house of the petitioner but she refused to accept the security. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the respondent-State, the present petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as such. March 29, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE Note:-Whether this case is to be referred to the Reporter .......Yes/No