1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No.418 of 2009 In Criminal Appeal No.671 of 2004 (Shri Liladhar Nathu Payghan v. State of Maharashtra) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri Bargat and Ms Archana Ramteke, Advocates for Appellant/Applicant. Shri T.A. Mirza, APP for Non-Applicant. CORAM : A.H. Joshi & R.C. Chavan, JJ. DATE : 4th February, 2009 1. The appellant has requested for appointment of an Advocate in place of Advocates Shri N.B. Bargat and Miss Archana Ramteke by discharging them. 2. The learned Advocates for the appellant have no objection. 3. Advocates Shri N.B. Bargat and Miss Archana Ramteke are discharged. 4. The Registrar (J) is directed to make the appointment of an Advocate from the Panel of Advocates ensuring that the Advocates who are appointed earlier in many cases should be the last preference. 2 5. Learned Advocates for the appellant should hand over the papers to the newly appointed Advocate suo motu and without waiting for the intimation. JUDGE JUDGE pdl