VQ:1 bT. 1 <fckh Itbltc. -fcOOZ IA...<^^^. .^. >T>ftll*>fs] '^l^ftyx©'b.Ulh.lh- l=n.P ^b ,ys!s~i:'3^ //i"^ » '^eses \>- :s^\p •OOO'OO'I—800S/II—S6/S;i—feUiatKB IHi>ll»!!ftl?^ fc-O'ri* •jeuoimad sq^ -10^ ^ ssynoo 'jeijoox nusy -)Uis ' ' -685Z-1F5S TF '.iBii&ipueyo •N-y yijs^uoH y ejiysiyv ejpuaiiqa WS '"OH (30) uoeSpueufBy PMISIQ '4-i86je8uoa '(enuaAsy) ^aayQ IBUOisiAia^ q"S SMi (00) uoeSpueufBy WISSQ 'uoeBpueufBy 'jo}09|too siu. (00) uoefipueufey putsia 'qjeSijjeBuoa 'ljounoo ledioiuni^i 'iuspissjcj eiji (00) uoeBpueufey pi4S!0 'qjefijeBuoa |iounoo ledioiuniAi 'jssUO ledioiunyy isiyo 8i|i (Q0}-ind!ey 'Sujpling •S'X'Q 'sejtiiKJjoiunM P )uaiuyed9G 'AjB)ejoes syi yBnoj^ 'yjeBsineiiMO i° SWS 841 -snsjs, (00) uoeSpueufey pwsia 'qjeBjeBuoa'jezeg |OQ 'SI'ON pje/y\ |3)ed P luspissj 'jopejiuoo IIAJO uoipdnooo 'sjeeA g^ inoqe psSe 'uier fe~\ sjoqsix uys o/s 'BUiBiyaued jBtun» pueuy :ij3uaauojsiAia s: • . t^ •• e s t :SlN3QNOdS3y t yaNoiiiiad !»^IK>ltU)K? Ifc jlSyap. p,&j j< y.ih t.jbujhiifc i*^i»By»>Bfii»a IblhttS l»y»IteU ifclt.bj lifc It^llc 311^1 ^RI ft-fi'* WIT sn^t jii)*iictt ^ '3^ -41<4M'tl, Q'rtl^i're, [siwi'yy M11CTI »*<l«t» "(^ 200 sn^f 'q^qr (ysl^yi) ipgiw ^itei sn^i c34 1'y pra^ed Shri Vinay t-farit, DepuqF respondents No.1, 4 and 5. Shri Abhishek Sinha, couns|E Heard. The petitioner has filed the) No.14 of Annexure-P/3 passed whereby the petitioner has been] form for the future tender work 01(1 complete the earlier tender work repairing work vide work order No| The petitioner has also pra^ ofthetender notlce ofAnnexure-t issue fresh tender notice. Howevli by the petltioner has become infr( already been finalized, thework o( been executed. This petition hs Council has passed resolutionof without affording any opportunlty 4 Shri Abhishek Sinha, Coundl, Dongergarh, submittec| explanation to the allegations petitioner did notcomplete the ieai) sarne shall be considered inaccot Advocate General for the State/ el for respondente No.2 and 3. <*l'<i<'l'iil-1 NW<-i('^TC!Axi<<^K ^taffiPI 311^1 instant petition against the resolution the Municipal Council, Dongergarh Idebarred from issuance ofthe tender the ground that the petitidner did not |of construction of CC Road and drain .|193 dated 25-7-2006. for other reliefs such as quashing Ip/2 and direction to the respondents to ^er, the retief No.7(2) and 7(3) claimed s, as the tender in questipn has tder has been issued and the work has |is been fited on the ground that the ^nnexure-P/3 blacklistlng the p^itioner clfhearing. ; eounsel appearlng for Municipat that in case the petitioner flles ^ferred to in the resolution that the itlier contraet work awarded to him, the 1-dance with law and approprlate fresh infrdctuous, iearitied •»n^!isbto^'n«sir(i3nRm<f—rs/95—11/2008—t,oo,ooo. T s ^ '3'=f •<ii'4Kri<i, ®fl1y're,fawiyy *<(*<<ii a»*<i«R •Wl 200 sn^i 'T^T ('p^is^) 3)I^T^[1<-< I%<I irar ^sn^ff sft*iict> Barve K ¥r«ffWW^ct <*ft^?E -5' orders shall be passed in respe( petitioner for the futurework withiijt explanation by the petltioner. Learned counsel for the petition may be dlsposed of by counsel Tor the respondent Munici()al Ordered accordingly. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge betitioner submitted at frie instant jrecordlng the submission of leamed Council. l+wii?i4!'t '<w<"il" ^ ft^t <I»i^it i?3ifiPi 311^51 t of issuance of tender form tothe a period of6 weeks from flling ofthe Sdf- R.N. Chandrakar Judge tlltl'CI''l!3^1ltl<"ll<!><llW-li<t'li.*—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000.