IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29082 of 2010 REENA KUMARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.08.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the bail petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner being the lady is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 467 and 471 of the I.P.C. It is alleged against this petitioner that she obtained the appointment as Angan Bari Sevika on the basis of a forged educational certificate. The impugned order suggests that the petitioner’s appointment has subsequently been terminated. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is pregnant at present and similarly situated persons who obtained the appointment as Angan Bari sevika on the basis of the forged certificates they have been granted anticipatory bail. Some of the orders have been brought on record as Annexures 4 and 5. The certified copy of the order passed in Cr. Misc. 2 No. 2634 of 2009 has been produced which suggests that other similarly situated accused was granted bail giving the benefit of the provision of Section 437(1) of Cr.P.C. Let the said order be kept on record. Considering the fact that the similarly situated other accused persons in different cases have been conferred the benefit of anticipatory bail and the fact that the petitioner is a lady and her appointment has already been cancelled, let the petitioner, Reena Kumari, be released on bail in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Barachatti P. S. Case No. 361 of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Sherghati at Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)