C.M. No. 6827 of 2011 in C.W.P. No. 2429 of 2011 and another connected case 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Date of Decision : May 20, 2011 C.M. No. 6827 of 2011 in C.W.P. No. 2429 of 2011 Jagdish Lal Monga and others .... PETITIONERS Vs. State of Punjab and others ..... RESPONDENTS C.W.P. No. 924 of 2011 Ganpat Rai and others .... PETITIONERS Vs. State of Punjab and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH * * * Present : Mr. P.K.Goklaney, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Amit Singh, Advocate, Ms. Amrinder Kaur, Advocate, for respondent No. 4. * * * AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL) C.M. No. 6827 of 2011 in CWP No. 2429 of 2011 C.M. is allowed. Written statement of respondent No. 4 is taken on record. C.W.P. No. 2429 of 2011 and C.W.P. No. 924 of 2011 Counsel for the State, on instructions from Sh. Jaspal Singh, Accountant, office of the Director, Local Government, Punjab, makes a statement and has also placed on record the documents in support of the C.M. No. 6827 of 2011 in C.W.P. No. 2429 of 2011 and another connected case 2 assertion that all retiral dues as per the letter dated 27.05.2009, which the State was required to make payment of, in compliance of the order dated 18.03.2011 which was reiterated on 12.05.2011, have been disbursed to the petitioners and the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Counsel for the Municipal Council states that all dues, which they were to pay to the petitioners, have also been cleared rendering the writ petition infructuous. In the light of the statements made by the counsel for the respondents, the present writ petitions are disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Counsel for respondent No. 4-Municipal Council states that any arrears due with regard to the pay revision would be disbursed to the petitioners within a period of two months' from today. In case, the petitioners still feel aggrieved, they may file a representation claiming the said benefits after a period of two months' and if such a representation is made, a speaking order be passed on the same by the concerned respondents within a further period of four weeks. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of another connected case. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) May 20, 2011 JUDGE pj