IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10747 of 2010 ROHIT SHARMA, S/o Bhular Sharma. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 24.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 302 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that there is no eye- witness to the occurrence and the witnesses examined in paragraphs 9 and 10 stated that it was Sanjay Sharma who had assaulted the deceased and the petitioner was merely a member of the mob. The prosecution case is that the informant learnt that his son has been shot at after he was called away by co-accused, Gani Sharma. When he reached there the deceased told him that the petitioner was one of the persons who had assaulted and someone of the group had fired at the deceased due to which he was injured and later on died. During investigation it transpired that the petitioner had a motive to commit this occurrence since the deceased and the petitioner were Doctors and the deceased was 2 having a good practice whereas the petitioner’s practice was not very good. It is for this reason the occurrence is said to have taken place, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it within a reasonable time. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)