IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1564 of 2007 YOGENDRA PRASAD, S/O LATE SINGHESHWAR PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- P.O. KOELI, P.S. BATHNAHA, DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. ..............PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, VIDYUT BHAWAN, PATNA-1. (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS ELECTRICITY BOARD). 2. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, PATNA-1. 3. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, PATNA-1. 4. THE GENERAL MANAGER-CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, TIRHUT AREA, MUZAFFARPUR. 5. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, ACCOUNTS, BIHAR STATE ELECTIRICITY BOARD, TIRHUT AREA, MUZAFFARPUR. 6. THE FINANCIAL CONTROLLER, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, PATNA-1. 7. THE ELECTIRCAL SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, MUZAFFAPUR ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR. 8. THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFAPUR. 9. THE ELECTRICITY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, SITAMARHI. 10. THE ASSISTANT ELECTRICAL ENGINNER, ELECTIRC SUPLY SUB-DIVISION, SITAMARHI. ..................RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02/ 09.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents Board. No counter affidavit has been filed in this case. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that during the pendency of this writ application the petitioner has received the retiral dues except the interest over the delayed payment of G.P.F. and G.S.S. and some other claims. He proposes to file a representation before respondent no. 3. - 2 - Considering the above submissions, the petitioner is directed to file representation before the respondent no. 3 within a period of six weeks’ along with the certified copy of the present order. In case, such representation is filed respondent no. 3 shall consider the same and dispose of by a reasoned order in accordance with law considering the grievances of the petitioner raised in his representation, expeditiously preferably within a period of three month from receipt of such representation. In case, the representation of the petitioner is disposed of in favour of the petitioner the respondent no. 3 shall simultaneously issue necessary orders with regard to payment of admissible claims as raised in his representation and in the light of the order passed by him on the representation. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. S.Sb/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)