" I ‘2, DER To Do JUSTICE IN THE MATTE R R about 52 Grade II Na1k aged Assistant ' Barrage, Dist. Korba (C,G.») VERSUS V ‘Achhe 1a1 Nalk S/o Shrl Harmath I ' years, ‘ Hasdeo .W/M Division Korba, Irrigation Colony Rampur Korba, ' 1. ‘ The State of Chhattisgarhthrough, ’ Secretary Irrigation Department E D.K.S. Bhawfan, Raipur (C.G.) . , 2. The, Executive Engineer Hasdeo Barrage, Rampur. Korba Dist. VKorba’ (0G,) ‘ I E'The ,Sub E Divisional‘ Officer, Hasdeo Barrage, Sub-division Darri KorbajDist Korba (C.G.) cLE 2261227 R IsSUANCE OF a O A WRIT PETITION No ”r??:.7 2004 i ‘ 1v i 325%1'1-2’004 _ ’ ' L I L H ‘ Shn RS. Patel, counsel f01 the pctltloner ‘ Shri VVS Murfhv, Dy~ Advocate Gengral mth Shn Vmod . EShlwastava Govt Advocate for me State. ’ , i l i I Apphcatlon for urgent hearmg is allowed, ’ Heard ’ > > Learned counsel for the petmonei: submlts that the matter ‘relates to transfel of the petttloner He further submlts that the IL 1pet1t10ner has been transfexred Eom Hasdeo Banage, / M D1v1s1on, Korba to Jal Sansadhan Sanbha Dahtewada, Vlde Annexure — P/ 1 'He also subxmts that the petltloneri 1s workmg as a Class-Ill , employee (Ass1sta11t Grade—H) Z-le also subrmts that the petlttoner ‘ l W _ has been transferred on the bas1s of false complamt made by Navyuvak Mandal S1cha1 Colony Rampur Korba He also submts that for the present the petmoner may be g1ve11 an opportumty of flhng the detalled representation before the competent anthontv of the respdndents,'xvl1ich shall bi cons1dered on 1ts own ments m ' . accordance with law. ' Having considered and:w1t aout expressmg any opunon on the :melrits'of the case, in the opinion of thls Court ends ofJustace W111 be: ‘ > € __ Tl l seived 1f a direction is given'tc the §et1tioner to make a detailed representation raising his grievances before the competent authority of the respondents along with a copy (if the petition- and this Order; within 15 daYs, and xkon sued rep esentation being filed L the Cl , ,. v “\Competent authority of the respo idents shall dec1de the same on 1ts w 1 t' l L }owri y mthm two months from the date of receipt of the representation. V Learned counsel for the petim'oner submits that the petitioner i hais not been relieved. He prays that the petitioner may be allowed to I continue. It is directed that if the petitioner has not been relieved and other person has not joined in place of the petitioner, the petitioner :may beallowed to continue till the représentation is decided. It is Imade clear that if the petitioner has already been relieved or other person has already )omed in place of the petitioner this order W111 not entitle the petitioner to rejoin at the earlier place of postmg With the aforesaid obsenahons, this petition stands disposed of. , - : Consequently M.W.P.No.4t424/ O4 31; I}.A.No.8220/ O4 also stand? IRE“ L1 l Sd/. v Fakhruddin ' ~ ‘ . Aeting ChiefJustice / disposed of. FS/.7E —§"i‘200( —50,000. 1 a — /