HIGH CQURT QF CIHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Writ Petition fS) No. 46^ Surendra Singh Sidar, aged about 24 years, son of late Shri Beersingh Sidar, occupation unemployed, R/o vill. & Post Saria, Block Baramkela, Tah. Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG). VERSUS State 1 iSshu of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The Collector, Distt. Raigarh (CG). 3. The District Education Offic.er, Distt. Raigarh (CG). 4. The Block Education OfBcer, Block Baramkela, Distt. Raigarh (CG). (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSHTUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satlsh K. Agnihotri, J.) Shri Roop Naik, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advocate General witfa Ms. Sunila Jain, Panel Lawyer tbrthe State. 0»ALOKDER (Passed on this 25th day ofAugust, 2008) With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing fmally, Leamed couosel appearing for the petitioner, on instruction, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. However, the petitioner prays that the representation dated 14.09.2005 (Annexure P/3) pending before the concemed authorities may be directed to be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within the prescribed time. 3. Shri Thakur, leamed counsel appearing for the State, submits that there is no reason asto whythe pending representation should notbe decided ^ by the conceraed authority, expeditiously, preferably wifhin a period of six weeks. 4. In view ofthe foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- .: . SatishK.Agnatotri — Juc^e