1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1394 OF 2006 Kashinath R. Mhatre and ors .... Petitioners. Versus Jaswant D. Pujani ...Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.826 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1394 OF 2006 Shri. Jaswant Pujani .. Applicant versus Kashinath Ramchandra Mhatre and ors .. .. Respondents. MR . G.S. Bhat, for the legal heirs of original petitioner No.6. Mr. P.A. Sarvankar, i/b Rahul Thakur for applicant in CA No.826 of 2010 and respondent in the petition. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 16th JULY, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. The petitioners are the original defendants in Reg Civil Suit No.104 of 2005 filed before the Civil Judge Sr. Dn at Panvel. The 2 present petition arises out of interim order passed in the aforesaid suit. The common statement is made by the learned counsel that the dispute between the parties, is settled amicably and consent terms are filed by the parties in the Trial Court and accordingly consent decree is also passed. Since the suit itself is disposed of, the writ petition which arises out of interim order passed in the said suit, does not survive and renders infructuous and the same is disposed of as such. (R. V. MORE, J.)