IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12728 of 2009 MUKESH MALIK, GENERAL SECRETARY, KISHANGANJ SAFAYEE KARAMCHARI SANGH, MADHAV NAGAR, DOMPATTI, DISTRICT-KISHANGANJ. -PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. COMMISSONER, PURNEA ZONE, PURNEA. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KISHANGANJ. 4. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, KISHANGANJ. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KISHANGANJ. 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER / CIRCLE OFFICER, KISHANGANJ. 7. THE CIRCLE OFFICER /ANCHALA ADHIKARI, KISHANGANJ. 8. TRILOK CHANDRA JAIN, VICE PRESIDENT, KISHANGANJ MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA-N.H. 31, THEGHARIA, DISTRICT-KISHANGANJ. 9. SANJAY KUMAR JAIN, S/O TRILOK CHANDRA JAIN, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA-N.H.31, THEGARIYA, DISTRICT-KISHANGANJ. 10.WASIM RAZA @ CAPTAIN S/O ALI HASSAN KHAN, P.S. PANIBAGH, DISTRICT-KISHANGANJ. -RESPONDENTS 4 05.11.2009 Heard the parties. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition in Public Interest raising a grievance that Anchala Adhikari, Kishanganj, has not instituted any formal encroachment case against Sanjay Kumar Jain, son of Trilok Chandra Jain, and some others while issuing notice for removal of encroachment over public land by the side of Ramzan river in Mouza Mohiuddinpur, P.S. 132, Khata no.129, Khesra no.306, total 2 area 7 bigha. The copy of notices show that the land has been treated as Gair Mazrua land which is alleged to have been encroached by construction of illegal pucca boundary wall and some other construction. On receipt of instructions learned Government Pleader no.16 submits that a land Encroachment Case no. 1 of 2009-10 has been initiated against one Sitaram Sharma and Others in respect of the matter under consideration and action for removal of encroachment will be taken by the same authority i.e. Anchala Adhikari, Kishanganj, in accordance with law and, in the meantime, further construction has been stopped by the Authorities. In view of the aforesaid submission by the learned counsel for the State, we find no good reason to keep this Public Interest litigation pending in this Court. It is, accordingly, disposed of with a direction to the concerned Authorities to proceed in the matter in accordance with law. Petitioner is given liberty that if in public interest he wants to furnish any relevant information to the concerned authorities dealing with the encroachment case, then he may do so in public interest and even disclose the 3 names of others who may have encroached the land. After considering such application the authorities are expected to proceed in accordance with law. (Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ.) (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) AAhmad