HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.2597 & 4536 of 2011 Date : 9-8-2011 W.P.No.2597/2011 Between : M/s.Sree Keerthi Combines, Represented by its Propritrix Smt.Padmaja, Hyderabad .. Petitioner And The Divisional Forest Officer, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District and another .. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri Vedula Venkataramana, Senior Counsel Counsel for respondents : Government Pleader for Forests representing Sri K.G. Krishna Murthy, Additional Advocate-General The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: These two Writ Petitions are filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents in canceling the permission granted to the petitioner for film shooting at island in Chamurugedda Reservoir (T) Division. In both these Writ Petitions, certain interim orders were passed on the basis of which the petitioner was permitted to carry on shooting for certain days. Sri Vedula Venkataramana, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that except for the two days in respect of which an order was passed by this court, the shooting of the film was completed and therefore, the cause on which these Writ Petitions are filed, does not survive for adjudication. With regard to the settings erected by the petitioner which were directed to be removed after completion of the shooting vide order of this court dated 8-2-2011, the learned Senior Counsel submitted that the respondents have registered two criminal cases in which the settings are shown as case properties (material objects). The learned Government Pleader for Forests representing the learned Additional Advocate-General submitted that these case properties are required to be produced before the criminal court and that the petitioner shall be free to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate for release of the case properties if it is so interested. Having regard to these subsequent circumstances, I see justification in the petitioner not being able to comply with order dated 8-2-2011 of this court to the extent of removal of the settings. Subject to the above observation, the Writ Petitions are disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel, interim orders granted in these Writ Petitions are vacated and all the pending applications are disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy Date : 9-8-2011 AM