Civil Revision No. 7306 of 2011 1 .. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7306 of 2011 Date of Decision: November 29th, 2011 Tikka Singh .... Petitioner Versus Jagar Singh and others .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER SINGH MALIK 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present Mr. M.L.Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. VIJENDER SINGH MALIK, J. Tikka Singh, petitioner has brought this revision petition under the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana to stay the proceedings in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 25 dated 4.12.2006 against the judgment and decree dated 10.11.2066 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Khanna, as the matter involved in the suit/appeal titled as above is directly in issue in Civil Writ Petition No. 12065 of 1996 titled Gurmail Singh etc. Vs. Additional Director of Consolidation Holdings, Punjab, Mohali etc. which stands admitted. Some land situated in village Lasara Polewas was recorded as mushtraka malkan. It was wrongly mutated in the name of Gram Panchayat. Some land owners of the village made an application under section 42 of the Consolidation of Holdings Act before Additional Director Civil Revision No. 7306 of 2011 2 .. Consolidation, Punjab, Mohali (for short, “the Additional Director”) for partition of this land amongst them as per their share. Gulab Kaur, the predecessor of the plaintiff and defendants was also a petitioner before the Additional Director. The said application was decided by the Additional Director vide order dated 19.6.1996 (Annexure P/2). The said order has been challenged by some of the non-right holders of the village by way of Civil Writ Petition No. 12065 of 1996 and the said writ petition stands admitted in this court. The provisions of section 10 of Code of Civil Procedure are pressed into service by the petitioner as reproduced in para No. 9 of the grounds of revision. The proceedings of the appeal or to say the proceedings of the suit are sought to be stayed on the ground of pendency of the civil writ petition. There is nothing on record to suggest that the writ petition has been filed earlier to the suit, which is pending in misc. civil appeal before learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana. Moreover, no prayer in this regard has been made to learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana, where the suit is pending in misc. civil appeal for stay of the proceedings. In these circumstances, this revision petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana for the relief sought in this petition by making an appropriate application, which, if made within one month from this date, would be decided within one month of its filing. (VIJENDER SINGH MALIK) JUDGE November 29th, 2011 som