In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... Criminal Misc. No.21339-M of 2007 ..... Date of decision:30.4.2007 Shanti Sarup Khanna .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents .... Present: Mr. Deepak Nayyar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. I.P.S. Sidhu, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State. ..... S.S. Saron, J. (Oral) Heard learned counsel for the parties. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 3 not to call the petitioner in police station time and again and not to harass the petitioner and his family members unnecessarily. On 4.4.2007, a copy of this petition was given to the learned State Counsel so as to enable him to seek instructions. Mr. I.P.S. Sidhu, learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, on instructions from HC Paramjit Singh, Police Station City, Tarn Taran, has submitted that in the case FIR No.33 dated 10.2.2007 registered at Police Station City Tarn Cr. M. No.21339-M/2007 [2] Taran for the offence under Section 302 IPC the address of the petitioner has been mentioned and it figures there. Therefore, the Police had summoned the petitioner for the purpose of investigation. It is further submitted that DSP Ranbir Singh, District Tarn Taran is conducting an inquiry with respect to the representation (Annexure-P.2) that has been filed by the petitioner. Keeping in view the aforesaid position the present petition is disposed of with a direction that in case the petitioner is wanted in connection with the investigation in the case he shall be summoned by sending a written requisition in terms of Section 160 Cr.P.C. April 30, 2007. (S.S. Saron) Judge *hsp*