IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 24TH JULY 2008 / 2ND SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 4205 of 2007(A) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- VAIGA DEVI, W/O.RADHAKRISHNA KURUP, AGED 35 YEARS, SREE KRISHNA MANDIRAM, EZHIPPURAM, PARIPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENTS: -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE FINANCE SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION H.O., VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, DISTRICT OFFICE, YMCA BUILDING, KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER. 4. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R), KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, KOLLAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.V.MANOJKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.4205/2007 A APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 24/10/2004. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE NOTICE DTD. 8/01/2007. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R2(A): COPY OF STATEMENTS OF ACCOUNTS IN THE TERM LOAN AS ON 31/03/2007. EXT.R2(B): COPY OF STATEMENTS OF ACCOUNTS IN WORKING CAPITAL LOAN AS ON 31/03/2007. /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.4205/2007 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT In this writ petition challenge is against Ext.P2 notice of sale issued under the Revenue Recovery Act. At the stage when the writ petition was admitted, this court by order dated 7.2.2007, granted a conditional order of stay requiring the petitioner to pay Rs.1,42,000/-. It is submitted by the standing counsel for the respondent that the order has been complied with and the sale has not been conducted. It is also submitted that in the meantime the petitioner has submitted an application for availing of the beenfit of One Time Settlement Scheme and that the said application is under consideration of the second and third respondent. 2 In view of the pendency of the petitioner's application for the benefit of One Time Settlement Scheme as above this writ petition is disposed of directing respondents 2 and 3 to consider the said application and pass orders thereon. It is further directed that until orders are passed as above, further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P2 will stand stayed. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. 3