wwgk 7K, PA¢E~® Vs .‘_ \09.)’-"$3# § gaEy-rxn Singh Ehaww , $5NE§LE 8EN€§H m THE HmH cavm‘ 0%: wwwmwm A? mmsgm Vim? 92“?.i‘rim rs} Na. 5%}13! Qaag 13ETETXGNER: /,Janakicd Varma; son oi? Ramkaii Verma; ageii abom 69 vanrs; Re‘med ?a‘?wari, resmem of Viiicxge "Eanszmkm; fahsii 5imgai D§sfricf Raigmr‘ {CG} RES?QNSENTS: ./$fa?e of ChhaTTisgurh, Through The Secremryi Eenerm Adminig'rmfiotn Dggm‘fmgm, Dau ; Sécre‘mria‘h Raiaur. \N §evenue; Dau Kmvm $imh , J Ehawani 5ecmhriaf; Raiaur. r 3. The Joim‘ Director, Treasuryi Fensian & Accoums: Rabur. . The 5u§3 Divisiom! Officer‘ NagrE; Disf‘r Dham'mr‘i {1X5} WRI‘? FE”?1°TION UNDER éRTKLE 226 G‘F THE CGNSTETU'?3”LGN The Sasre‘mw Denar‘fmem‘ of r i s" \§L GF ENDEA AmiL / RES?ONDENTS a WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HEGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 7231 of 20(39 Janaklal Verma. VERSUS State ofChhatiisgarh & Others. SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. / Present: Shri Dinesh R.K.Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER g ORAL l (Passed on 11 day of December, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to Withdraw this petition with liberty to pursue his representation dated nil (Annexure P/S) pending before the Sub Divisional Otiicer, Nagri, District Dhamtari. Shri Pankaj Slnivastava, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondents submits that if the ‘representatiorn as aforestated is pending consideration, the same shall be considered and tiecided in accordance with law, on is own merit and perspective as expeditiously as possible. Consequently, the 'writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty and observations. f Satish K. Agnihotri t 7, Judge l“ sw—