- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3887 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.3887 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.3887 OF 2005 Anil Dhayabhai Parmar ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.D.A.Patil and Mr.M.D.Parab for the Applicant Mr.U.V.Nikam, A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 29,2005. : JUNE 29,2005. : JUNE 29,2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Counsel appearing for the parties. The offence alleged against the Applicant is under Section 302 of I.P.C. The allegation against the Applicant is of committing murder of his sister and husband of the sister. The sister of the husband is the Eye witness to the alleged incident. The Applicant was caught in the house of sister’s husband. A knife was also recovered from the spot. 2. These are the factors which clearly show the involvement of the Applicant in a crime of very serious nature. 3. The application made by the Applicant for bail has been rejected by the learned 1st Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan. It is also recorded in the order that on the day of passing the order charges will be framed and trial will be expedited. - 2 - 4. No case is made out for grant of bail. Accordingly, Application is rejected. As directed by the learned 1st Ad Hoc Addl.Sessions Judge, Kalyan, the trial will be concluded expeditiously. 5. It is obvious that any observation made in this order shall not be construed as any finding or any expression of opinion on the merits of the case at the time of trial. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE