HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.28799 of 2008 Date: October 21, 2009 Between: S. Anandaiah … Petitioner And 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department (Land Acquisition), Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and 3 others. … Respondents * * * ORDER: This Court issued Rule Nisi on 30.12.2008 and granted interim direction in W.P.M.P.No.37685 of 2008. 2. Heard Sri T.C.D. Sekhar, learned counsel representing the writ petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition. 3. The writ petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying ex-gratia to the petitioner for the land admeasuring Ac.2-42 cents in Sy.No.390/1 of Mallavaripalem village, Satyavedu Mandal, Chittoor District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith pay the ex-gratia to the petitioner for the land admeasuring Ac.2042 cents in Sy.No.390/1 of Mallavaripalem village, Satyavedu Mandal, Chittoor District and pass such other suitable orders. 4. The petitioner was assigned land admeasuring Ac.2-42 cents in Sy.No.390/1 of Mallavaripalem village. It is stated that respondent No.4 issued a notice dated 20.5.2008. The petitioner had given a reply to the notice dated issued by respondent No.4. It is also stated that two representations had been made. It is further stated that 10 (1) form of respondent No.4, dated 05.8.2008, would show the name of the petitioner as pattadar. Several facts had been narrated in detail in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. 5. This Court is not inclined to express any opinion touching upon the merits and demerits of several of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, inclusive of G.O.Ms.No.1307. 6. Be that as it may, since it is stated that the petitioner made a representation dated 22.7.2008 to the 4th respondent-Mandal Revenue Officer, Sathyavedu Mandal, let the 4th respondent consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 22.7.2008, and dispose of the representation in accordance with law as early as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 7. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. ____________________ (P.S. NARAYANA, J) Date: October 21, 2009. BSB