-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1795 OF 2007 Hridayanarayan Kedarnath Upadhyaya ...Petitioner versus The Slum Rehabilitation Authority and others ... Respondents Mr. V.R. Tripathi, instructed by M/s. V.R. Tripathi & Associates, for the petitioner. Mr. J.G. Reddy for respondent No.1. Mr. Milind More, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.2 and 5. Mr. S.G. Surana for respondent Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2007. P.C. In the reply affidavit it has been stated that the petitioner had not filed any documents before the respondents. However, the counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had submitted to the authorities various documents including shops and establishment certificate, rent bills, trade licence, etc. It is not necessary for us to go into these factual controversies. In the interest of justice, we direct the petitioner to submit copies of all documents within one month from today to the respondents and produce the originals, if so desired by the -2- respondents. The Competent Authority shall pass an appropriate order two weeks thereafter and communicate the same to the petitioner. During this period and one week after the communication of the order passed by the Competent Authority, status quo in regard to the premises shall be maintained. 2. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.