l"i.^- f^ ^^ Q INTHEHIGHGOORt QF.JUDIGATURE.AT BIIASPUR W.P..NO. -^S-6; /2005 ^y pEnnQNER ^^ ••*' ' • '.**" ' . .-**' :^^--i--"'"':: ^^•''....••••%;1". '- KusteK^imar •Sharma, S/o. Shn Durga PraSaU ShaE-ma., aged about .45 5?ears, Bus-Qpercifor, R/6. Ya.au&andan -Nagar, SiIS.SFtur. •.~:::,.:\.- ..: '..: ' •• ^ 09? y Versus " ^i>i ^y RESPONDENTS ^l^ r^:.^^ ^t^&^ ^'s* Staf&, .^1,1'ranspart Appellate •.' .'Tril3unal,-(C.G.)^R^ ^-<^. Regional TrSLnsport AHthbrity, "Raipur.-" • :• —':. . ':' .' ': ,'•• I. Secretary, Regional Transport Authon^, Btlasp'yr., : : ' ^^.' ^Ara^.^KumaE^^)'I^d^ S/Q.' -./l.'..,':SHriiiB^.'I*^(lan,^@ug-ogeratoF/ •R/s^.? 'Pa]:HgaFKt''^@is(t. ^Jary ;.,'11, .•CHamiya (C.©.)':: ,:1'. i^ . : r PETITIONXJNI»BRART'ICLES^S226/227^QF^THaB -•coNS'i^'WiWNlMESaiBi^^A'^^ a, HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 796 OF 2005 ^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Kush Kumar Sharma Versus State Transport Appeltate Tribunal &0thsrs (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri B.P.Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER (Passed on this O?*" day of December, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that with the passage of time, nothing sunrives in this petition for adjudication and, as such, the petition has become infructuous. 2. No objection from other side. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous. - —^" ^^- N^ s»^'^ &AI- ^ott1 SWffil.