1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 9649 of 2011-E Decided on: 14.11.2011 Gain Singh Rawat .....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others ....Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Davinder Chauhan Jaita, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner claims the benefit of ad hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and increments. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in his favour by the judgments of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, titled as Sita Ram vs. State H.P, decided on 15.7.2010 and CWP No. 4550 of 2010 titled as Ravi Kumar vs. State of H.P. & another and other connected matters, decided on 16.12.2010. 2 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioner submits that he would file an appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for him to do so. 3. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents concerned to examine the matter, after verifying the facts, in the light of the judgments, referred to above, and take appropriate action thereon, within a period of four months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment, alongwith his representation and a copy of the writ petition as well as copies of the judgments, referred to above, by the petitioner. 4. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. November 14, 2011 (Justice Sanjay Karol), (rana/hl) Judge.