WWW %€'HF~HQR %Wm asmw 26m Shn Sanjav K Agarwzi, Daputv Advocate Galmral far the Siam. Ham‘d. All thesa three writ p6 tition NOS. 1937/2003 {_ ViShEshaI ajiéa Vishaha’i VS, Dashak and another}, 1938! 2003 {Vi3heshal alias visshahat Vs. } {Sathlughém Ram and ot}1€1‘s V3,. Vivak Kumar DaV6 and another) am being disposal on" bv thi$ commOn ordlir as the sank {dams to tilt: $anm issue 111 thc afomsaid wr .t pctitimw thc pctitioncrs havc. challenged the order glamd ( )7j05/2003 passed by the learned IIIHI Civil Judg6, Ciass I, 1V ahasammxl in Civil Suit NOS.106— alld 13 > AL; 2‘00 1, 43—11;; 2003 that inspite of the issuance of the lem‘lmd Civil Judge 1‘ecordec1 summons the plaintiffs; v ‘itneeges. Chhabi Ram ’Diwaxl ami Manarakhan Dhmw are 110 i present 25$ Chha‘mi Ram Diwall requeeted fha’z since he is buieV in official week: Thm fnie he 1s / f3hm' Kighora Badhuri,‘ counsel far tha petitioner 7 r4: —A/ 2002 mspectively by which the F I ‘ \ WeW / \‘\ *‘/ Writ Petitien Nosa 1937/2003, 1938/2003 & 1939/2003 mm m zoo m Banmai and glimmer} and 19:)9g2000 unable to remafm pregent b‘ ’fore the Court and Manarakhail nable to remain present in £116 Dhmw raquested that he is; u Court on account of hiS ill—1m 31th. This Court fur§1ey recorded ‘tha‘L Since the mat‘mr i$ p€ndmg for mcording th€ widrmce. of thése two Pafxx/"aiiéfs Since 071i: .1/ 2001 311d the plaintiff 113$ 110T. calling thaw witnxESSes, through mevad‘ any application for summons as witnessas‘ theréltfm‘é, the piamtiff is; dimcted to pmduca H1636 Witnassas on hisi OVJIL Leanled 001111361 far m Panx7a1i€s are listed witnrssses 1 puyposs RF. fur issuaxlcl: of s pmmons wcn: paid by (lit: plw'ntiff .agld accomh'ngly thcsc winACSs ‘63 arc summoned bv dislcarncd under the control of the plaintiff Civil Judge and they am; not bang a pubHC servant umes $ and ‘uni‘il thev are summoned through the process of ‘fhe C Curt, their attendance cannot be procured and they are most im yortgmt mid material WitneSSes fo‘r ;6 patitieners al‘guad max mass in all three Civil Suits and for that J 1116 deci$ion of the disgpute in t he suit and withoui seedling their arteiic’izmce the 1ight of the 131a intjff will be seiiously prejudiced will suiier meparable injm‘y on and affeeted and the plaintiff [View account of non-exwnination c‘f these witnc‘SSSS. ofde‘r of the Earned Ciml JudgJ‘F i's 11m proper mid legal tim Qut$€t At cemdidly anit frankly aclmit‘md that if ths Courr of the Civil Jutige commands by iesumg Dasti snmmous; requm‘ng the presence of thos€ WimeSS€s. they Wm t1} to sEcm‘E the attaldalxw of thE Witnasses‘ a11d if alwthing 12a§p€n$ which iS bavond the cogtrol of 1:116 plaintiff, than they will sulgmit 111a report befom th€ Court. Hg furihsr submitted that 07/05/2003 pasgsed by tha 16£n1€d Civil Judge, the plamn'ffs are 21150 prtpal‘cd t9 i116 an apph'cabbn fer Sx‘mnlmniug t110$c , witnCSSés. Counsel for the petitioner at this Stage Submitted that the Ie53p011dent no.1 was ex pm‘ie throu‘gh 'ouf 1'11 the proceeding becauw insp‘ite of the S‘ewicé he did not a,ppea1‘,¢(therefore, in these peh‘tions the order can be Eaassed Withaut iSsuance éf nofice to that party a$ it .i$ not going to effect the inte’gest of ihe respcndent 110‘ 1. . Thexefore. the cenngel far tha 136titioner vemv‘ in conSonazxce with me order \_ \ New learned , XI—HC-zz‘ imam“ ‘ . ‘Having heard tbs lean Let} Caunse} far iha warde$ aha situatioa which has arisen out 0f having raga'xd to the peculiar Judge) and cmxmdmiug the factg the m‘der pass$€d 13V the Civil mm CJI‘cumgianceS of thE ca3€ ‘03 Just; proper 911a. appropnair 3 ‘10 (iiwo‘se of mask: writ peuiiouss Wifh a diractian that if tha 136m Loners mave all apyiica‘rion 1'11 their efora thé‘. iEarnad Civil Judga TCSP€C11V6 CaS€S b mantiGning Iimrain that the, S11 mmous: mav be hemded ovsr Das‘ti for 6ff€cting ma sawiba on 11m <‘oncemed Pam’ariss aim procurmg \ g théir attendanca, than the Eam€d Civil Judg's to consider that applicatien stud pass aypropl iatc ordcr t0 hand ovcr tilt: DaSti , 3111711110113 to thc plaintiff far set :un'ng attcndemcc of thc cormmncd not appear iilspite of smvice then Patwariaa and if Patwan‘es £10 bailabfs warrants. they call be summoned Througl: With the aforésaiclr obse1 disposed of. ‘ Consequeni iv, M‘WP, Nos. 175532003, 1756/2003, 1757;2003, IVAK Q5313; 2003, 5814; 2?}03 am I am 0f i‘h€ 031111011 mm 1i Wonk} vation? these writ yetitions Stand 5815/ 12003 also $t3nd dispQSEm 3f. Sci/— L.C.BHADOO Judge [@A §