IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19299 of 2011 Babloo Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 28.6.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. No doubt petitioner is on footing of Raju Kumar who has been allowed bail by a Bench of this Court vide Cr.Misc.No. 45183 of 2010 but it appears that there was some wrong submission made while the bail was granted to the co- accused as that is to the effect that the only material was confessional statement of co- accused while this petitioner as well as co- accused Raju Kumar are named in the F.I.R. showing their active participation in committing crime of robbing the informant and his friend on road after the sunset. Hence petitioner is not entitled for bail even after considering his custody since 8.9.2010. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail on behalf of petitioner is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)