IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48168 of 2008 UPENDRA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS For the Petitioner :Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur For the State :Mr.R.B.Roy ‘Raman’, APP ----------- 02. 20.07.2010 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners to press this application. However, learned APP is present. The petitioner seeks direction from this Court for transfer of Sessions Trial No.831/05 from the file of Sri Sitaram Prasad, F.T.C.V, Sitamarhi to any other court of concurrent jurisdiction. Such prayer has been made on the ground that learned trial court closed the prosecution evidence without providing adequate opportunity to the petitioners for their examination. It appears from the order dated 9.6.2008 (Annexure-2) that prosecution was given adequate opportunity to produce the witness. The witness was not produced by the prosecution. Accordingly, the evidence was closed. It further appears that the petitioners approached the Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi by filing Cr. Misc. Petition No.41 of 2008 for recall and transfer of the aforesaid trial from the file of learned F.T.C.V, Sitamarhi which was dismissed. Learned APP submits that the prayer of the petitioners seems to be unjustified in the facts and circumstances of the case. In that view of the matter, the application is dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )