In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh F.A.O. No. 1098 of 2008 Date of decision: November 19, 2009 Sona Devi .. Appellant Vs. Ram Kumar and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Jaideep Verma, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for the Insurance Company. Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for the private respondents. A.N. Jindal, J This is an appeal against the order dated 20.9.2007 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Yamuna Nagar, dismissing the claim petition preferred by the appellant-claimant Sona Devi. The case of the appellant is that on 17.10.2005, at about 6.00 a.m. the deceased was going to the agricultural field of respondent No.1 on the tractor of the later, on which the trolley was attached for unloading the paddy. When the tractor reached the kacha passage of the village, Naresh Pal fell down from the tractor and he expired on reaching General Hospital, Jagadhri. The claim petition preferred by Sona Devi, on the death of Naresh Pal was contested by the respondents. From the pleadings of the parties, the following issues were framed :- 1. Whether the accident resulting in death of Naresh Pal alias Kala was result of rash and negligent driving of vehicle No.HR-02J-7965 by respondent No.1?OPP 2. If issue No.1 is proved, to what amount petitioners are entitled to claim as compensation and from whom?OPP 3. Whether respondent No.1 was not holding a valid driving licence at the relevant, if so, to what effect?OPR 4. Relief. F.A.O. No. 1098 of 2008 -2- *** The claimant during her evidence examined herself as PW-1, Pala Ram (PW2) an eye witness to the occurrence. He also proved on record copy of the FIR and post mortem report Ex.P2. Though the Tribunal framed four issues, yet, no findings have been returned on all the issues. The Tribunal has also not appreciated the statement of Pala Ram (PW2). As such, the award has been rendered illegal warranting interference at my end. In view of the matter, the appeal is accepted, the impugned award is set aside and the case is remitted back to the Tribunal to decide the same afresh according to law. Parties are directed to appear before the Tribunal on 15.1.2010. November 19, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge