IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY WRIT PETITION Nos.6716 AND 22333 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION Nos.6716 OF 2008: Between: Padala Subba Reddy. … Petitioner And The District Collector, East Godavari District at Kakinada and three others. … Respondents WRIT PETITION Nos.22333 OF 2008: Between: Padala Subba Reddy … Petitioner And The District Collector, East Godavari District at Kakinada and three others … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri K.Venkatesh. (In both the WPs) Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Land Acquisition (In both the WPs) This Court made the following: COMMON ORDER:- The petitioner in both the Writ Petitions is common. He ﬁled these two Writ Petitions questioning the declaration issued under Section 6 and award passed under Section 11(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short “the Act”). On an identical set of facts, this Court today dismissed Writ Petition Nos.5440 and 18670 of 2008 by a common order. It is agreed by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition that the issues raised in these two Writ Petitions are identical to the issues raised in the said two Writ Petitions. Therefore, for the reasons contained in the common order passed in the said two Writ Petitions, these two Writ Petitions are dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to seek reference of dispute to the competent civil Court under Section 18 of the Act. ------------------------- ----------- C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date: 20-10-2008 MNR