IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 19441 of 2011 1.Vinod Kumar & others ..Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & others. ..Respondents CWP No.19886 of 2011 2.Ashok Kumar & Others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & others. ..Respondents Date of Decision 31st October,2011 CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER. Present:-Ms. Alka Chathrath, Advocate for petitioners Mr. Vinod Kumar & Others. Ms. S.S. Sangwan, Advocate for petitioners Mr. Ashok Kumar & Others. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. DAG Haryana. MAHESH GROVER, J (Oral). This order will dispose of above mentioned two petitions. The petitioners who are contractual employees had made a grievance that their services cannot be terminated and be replaced by another set of contractual employees. To substantiate their plea the reliance has been placed on Judgment Annexure P-9. There is no quarrel with the observations made in the judgment on which the reliance has been placed. The services of the petitioners being contractual are governed by the terms of the appointment and therefore they do not have any inherent right to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court to perpetuate the terms of the appointment. They can have claim if the services of the petitioners are replaced by another set of contractual employees which material is absent from the pleadings set up in the instant petitions. Both the petitions stand disposed of. October 31, 2011 (MAHESH GROVER) aarti JUDGE