1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Application No.1167 of 2009 In Misc. Civil Application (Review) Stamp No.18403 of 2009 In Writ Petition No.3309 of 2004 (D) (Murlidhar s/o Uttamrao Lavale v. The Shri Chhatrapati Shahu Shikshan Sanstha and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri S.S. Adkar, Advocate for Applicant. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : DECEMBER 16, 2009. By reasoned judgment, after considering all the arguments, this Court has by judgment dated 19-1-2007, found the employee/respondent No.2 therein not entitled to any back wages. The present Misc. Civil Application is for review of that judgment. The civil application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 2 years and 274 days in filing that review application. The learned counsel for the applicant has argued that this Court has considered the points argued correctly. He relied upon a recent judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Metropolitan Transport Corporation v. V. Venkatesan, reported in 2009(6) All MR 443, to urge that there though the employee was found to have enrolled himself as Advocate, his back wages were reduced, but some amount 2 was given to him. He further invites attention to Annexure-L at page 80 with writ petition to state that in that communication, the Deputy Director of Education had written to School to release back wages by pointing out that as Science stream was closed, the employee could not have been permitted to join duties. It has to be noted that this Court has found that the employee did not bring his employment to the notice of the School Tribunal and as he did not submit any joining report, the judgment of the School Tribunal did not come into force. Thus the arguments advanced have already been considered by this Court and thereafter the judgment is delivered. No case is made out by the learned counsel for the learned counsel for the applicant. In view of this, there is no need to issue any notice to the other side on the application for condonation of delay. The application for condonation of delay as also Misc. Civil Application for review are rejected. JUDGE pdl.