ABA-642-11.sxw 1 Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.642 OF 2011 Sudhir Dattatraya Tumma ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra, Thru’ Yerwada Police Station, Pune ... Respondent Mr. Madhav Jamdar for the Applicant. Mrs. G.P. Mulekar, APP, for the Respondent. Applicant is present in person. CORAM:- A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED :- 26 TH JULY, 2011. P.C. : 1. Mentioned. Not on board. 2. By consent of the learned APP for the Respondent, heard finally. 3. Among other things, it is submitted by Mr. Jamdar, the learned Advocate for the Applicant, that the First Informant, who is the wife of the Applicant, and the Applicant have arrived at some understanding, and that the First Informant is present in the Court. He submits that even the First Informant wants that the Applicant be granted anticipatory bail. ABA-642-11.sxw 2 Dixit 4. I have heard the First Informant, who is present in the Court. She says that considering all the aspects and as the four years old daughter of the Applicant and the First Informant needs the love and affection of the parents, the First Informant is in favour of granting anticipatory bail to the Applicant. 5. Considering these aspects, the Anticipatory Bail Application is not opposed by the learned APP for the Respondent-State. 6. The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. 7. In the event of his arrest in C.R. No.346 of 2011 of Yerwada Police Station, Pune, the Applicant be released on bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/-, with one surety in like amount, on the condition to attend the Yerwada Police Station and make himself available for investigation/interrogation, as and when required by the Investigating Officer. [A.M. THIPSAY, J.]