w HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 3517 of 2009 PETlTlONER : Anwar Ali, S/o Saiyad Ahamed Ali, aged . about 40 years, R/o 0-18, Sector - 5, Devendra Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil 8: Dist. Raipur(CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Transport Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). 2. Regional Transport Authority, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). WRIT PETlTlON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF lNDlA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) ‘ on 17‘ day of July, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage. However, the respondent -authorities may be directed to consider and decide his pending application dated 24-4-2009 (Annexure P/1) in accordance with law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible. Shri Sao, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the respondents submits that there is no reason asto why the representation of the petitioner, as stated above should not be considered expeditiously. Shri Sao further submits that the above-stated representation shali be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In View of the clear statement made by learned counsel appearing for the respondents, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing remains to be adjudicated. (Passed Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. i .» r , Sd/_ ,; Satish K. Agnihotri‘ ' Judge “7‘35! l.