1 CA-29-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 29 OF 2010 in CONTEMPT PETITINO NO.391 OF 2009 Deelip Balasaheb patil (Kaulavkar) & Anr. .. Applicants (Orig.Respdts.Nos. 2& 3) Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respndents Mr. S.S.Kanetkar, Advocate, for the applicants. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 24th September, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard Mr. Kanetkar, the learned Counsel for the applicants, who are respondents Nos. 2 and 3 in the Contempt Petition No.391/2009. 2. Bailable Warrant was directed to be issued in the Contempt Petition against respondent Nos. 2 and 3 as they had failed to appear inspite of service. Now they have appeared and are represented by an Advocate. Therefore, the Application is allowed. The Bailable Warrants stand cancelled. Application stands disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)