IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13175 of 2010 Between: Kothapalli Srilaxmi Narasimhamurthy … Petitioner And Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District, Kakinada & others. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: None Counsel for respondents 1-3: AGP for Home The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13175 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.2 in interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.4, as illegal and arbitrary. In his affidavit, the petitioner stated that he is the owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.5.52 cents in Sy.No.221/2 of J.Thimmapuram Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District, that respondent No.4, who is the resident of the village in which the said land is situated, was permitted to cultivate the land on his behalf, that respondent No.4 fraudulently fabricated a gift deed in favour of his daughter for the said land and that the petitioner filed a civil suit for injunction and obtained temporary injunction against respondent No.4, that when the petitioner started doing agricultural operations, he was forcibly driven out of the land by respondent No.4. It is alleged that respondent No.2 started sending police to the petitioner’s house, summoning him to the police station and making him to sit in the station at odd hours threatening him to settle the dispute with respondent No.4. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that on the report lodged by respondent No.4 on 30.05.2010, Crime No.103 of 2010 was registered against the petitioner for the offences under Sections 447, 427 and 506 read with Section 34 IPC and that except registering the said case and conducting investigation, the police are not interfering with the life and personal liberty of the petitioner. The above submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader are placed on record and the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2 not to violate any of the legal or constitutional rights of the petitioner concerning his life and personal liberty while dealing with him in connection with the abovementioned criminal case. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.16601 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 28.07.2010. ES