IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5811 of 2010 1. MITHILESH YADAV 2. UMESH YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02/ 04/03/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Considering the defence of the petitioners themselves in a police case under Sections-307, 341, 323, 324 and 506/34 of Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act from para-39 of the case diary as noticed in the impugned order of rejection, petitioner No.2 is alleged to have fired on the left leg and is therefore not entitled to bail considering his custody from 7.10.2009 at this stage. The application is rejected with regard to him. The absence of any injury on the right leg being noticed in para-39 of the case diary, let petitioner No.1 named above be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Chandauti P.S. Case No.130/09. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)