1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1101 OF 2009 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1355 OF 2009 Bijay Singh Baid ... Appellant v/s Tejsingh Baid ... Respondent Mr.Tushar Goradia for the appellant. Mr.C.K.Tripathi for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 16TH DECEMBER, 2009 P.C.: 1. The notice of motion has been allowed on 26.2.2009 in a suit filed by the respondent for an injunction restraining the defendants from dispossessing the plaintiff from the 1st floor premises at Sagar Bhavan, 147, Princess Street, Mumbai – 400 002. 2. The respondent contends that he was in possession of these premises along with his father under an arbitration 2 award. The Trial Court has found that, prima facie, the respondent has established his right to continue in the suit property and, therefore, has granted an interim injunction. 3. In my view, no case has been made out for interference. The suggestion of the learned advocate for the appellant that since the Receiver has not been discharged in some earlier proceedings the Receiver should take possession of the suit premises cannot be accepted. 4. Appeal from order stands dismissed along with the civil application. ..... 3