IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. : 6269 of 2008. Decided on: 27.07.2010. _________________________________________________________ H.C. Kanwar. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : None. For the respondent/ State. : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Other respondents are ex-parte. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge(Oral): Petitioner is an employee of the H.P. State Cooperative Bank Ltd.. He is aggrieved by the various orders passed by the respondent-Bank. However, in view of the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Chandresh Kumar Malhotra Versus H.P. State Coop. Bank and others, 1993(2) Sim. L.C. 243, the petition is not maintainable against the H.P. State Co-operative Bank. 2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed being not maintainable against the respondent-Bank. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to pursue his remedies, available to him in accordance with law. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 27, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?