IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.2703 of 2006. SUIT NO.2703 of 2006. SUIT NO.2703 of 2006. Rukmani Bherumal Wadhwani ..Plaintiff versus Veena Sikand & Ors. ..Defendants Mr.S.K.Dubey for the Plaintiff Mr.K.T.Kukreja for the Defendants CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 10th Oct., 2008. DATED : 10th Oct., 2008. DATED : 10th Oct., 2008. P.C. 1. Consent terms dated 6.10.2008 signed by the plaintiff, defendant No.1 and their respective advocates are tendered in the Court. Plaintiff and defendant No.1 are present in the Court. They admit their signatures and they admit that the contents of the Consent terms have explained to them in Hindi. Both the learned advocates present before the Court pray for decree in terms of the Consent Terms. Hence, the Order. ORDER . Consent terms as above are taken on record and marked "X". -2- . There shall be decree in terms of the consent terms, with no order as to costs. . Refund of Court fee is granted as per rules. . Parties to comply with Clause (8) of the Consent terms as regards registration under the Indian Registration Act. . All interim/ad-interim Orders passed earlier stand vacated. (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.)