IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC Nos.10451 of 2002 JAWAHAR RAM, son of Sri Jaipat Ram, resident of Village & PO Harpur, PS Harpur, District West Champaran ………………………. Petitioner With CWJC No.10509 of 2002 RAM DHANI RAM, son of Late Parmeshwar Ram, resident of Village & PO Banuchapra, PS Muffasil Bettiah, District West Champaran ……………..Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Commissioner cum Secretary, PHED, New Secretariat,Patna-1 2. The Engineer in Chief, Public Health Engineering Department (PHED), New Secretariate, Patna-1 3. The Chief Engineer, PHED, At & PO Muzaffarpur District Muzaffarpur 4. The Superintending Engineer, PHED, At & PO Motihari, District West Champaran 5. The Executive Engineer, PHED, Division At & PO Bettiah, District West Champaran. …………………….. Respondents in both cases ----------- 3. 24.02.2009 Heard leaned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 13.4.2002 terminating their services from the post of daily rated Mazdoor. This Court finds substance in the submission of the petitioners that the impugned order was in violation of the principles of natural justice inasmuch as no show cause notice was issued to the petitioners of any alleged irregularity/illegality in the appointment. Paragraph 2 of the impugned order dated 13.4.2002 itself visualises myriad possibilities and the consequent willingness of the respondents to reconsider individual case of termination if the requirements as mentioned therein were fulfilled. Learned Counsel for the State, in that view of the matter, fairly submits that this writ application may be disposed off in terms of the order of the Division Bench in the case of Ram Tapeshewar Sah & others Versus The State of Bihar, 2006(3) PLJR 376 by which such matters have been referred to a Committee constituted under the orders of this Court for examination. This writ application is disposed with liberty to the petitioners to submit their representation in terms of their claim of a regular appointment to be examined by the aforesaid Committee and a decision taken with regard to them within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. Annexure 6 is set aside for that limited purpose only and does not result in reinstatement of the petitioners automatically but shall remain subject to the final recommendation of the Committee. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)