IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 29TH MAGHA 1930 Bail Appl..No. 392 of 2009() ---------------------------- (CASES REREGISTERED AND NUMBRED BY CBCID, SIG-2, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM) PETITIONER/ACCUSED -------------------------------------- BINDHU MAHESH, AGED 33, D/O.SHEEBA, T.C. 10/797, PNRA - A 52, PUNNATHOTTAM VEEDU, MANNANTHALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.UDAYABHANU RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DY.SP CRIME BRANCH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. (CBCID CRIME NO.169/CR/TVM/08) REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.K.SURESH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. HEMA, J. --------------------------------------------------- Bail Appl. No. 392 of 2009 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of February, 2009. ORDER Petition for anticipatory bail. 2. The alleged offences are under Sections 406, 420 and 34 of IPC. According to petitioner, she was arrested on 18.9.2008 in connection with “Total four You” scam and she is implicated in cases one after other whenever she is granted bail. It is submitted that immediately on execution of the bail bond in one case, petitioner is being implicated in some case or other and thereby her release is being prevented. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor was directed to verify whether petitioner is an accused in any of the cases in which she is not so far arrested, out of the 21 cases, which are already registered in connection with “Total four You” scam, which are being investigated by CBCID. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that petitioner is an accused only in 14 cases and out of these, her arrest is recoded in 13 cases. Petition is already filed for recording her arrest in the 14th case. Therefore, police does not [B.A.No.392/2009] 2 intend to arrest her in any other crime. These submissions are recorded. 4. In the light of the submissions, there is no ground for apprehension of arrested by respondent and hence anticipatory bail cannot be granted. Petition is disposed of accordingly. K. HEMA, JUDGE. Krs.