IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 277 OF 2008 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 347 OF 2008 Canara Bank .... Plaintiffs. Vs. Lata Prakash Gidwani and Anr. .... Defendants. Mr. O.A.Das Advocate for the Plaintiffs. None for the Defendants. CORAM : A.A.Sayed, J. DATE : May 7, 2009. P.C. 1. This Summons for Judgment is taken out by the Plaintiff-Bank to enter a judgment against the defendant for an amount of Rs. 96,836.00 with further interest @13.75% per annum plus 2% per annum penal interest from the date of filing of the suit till payment and/or realization. 2. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiff has filed affidavit of service of the Summons for Judgment. Perusal of the record discloses that Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of the defendant No.1. However, none appears on behalf of both the defendants. The person to whom the loan was sanctioned by the Plaintiff-Bank is defendant No.1 and the defendant No.2, according to the Plaintiff-Bank is the co-applicant. There is no reply filed by the defendants opposing the Summons for Judgment. 3. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiff-Bank has tendered Affidavit of Evidence and a list of Documents, containing 11 original documents. The said documents are taken on record and marked Exhibit "A" collectively. 4. In the circumstances, the Summons for Judgment is made absolute. The suit is decreed in terms of prayer clause (a) of the plaint. However, interest rate after filing of the suit till payment and/or realization is restricted to 13.75% per annum. 5. Refund of Court fees as per rules. 6. The Summons for Judgment and suit to stand disposed of. [A.A.Sayed, J.]