IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.11948 of 2011 Date of Decision : July 12, 2011. Manjit Singh .....Petitioner versus The Presiding Officer, Labour Court and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Amandeep Singh Manaise, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner has raised an industrial dispute which has been referred to for adjudication to the Labour Court, Amritsar vide reference No.141/05 dated 14.9.2005. The petitioner has now approached this Court seeking a direction to the Labour Court to decide the dispute in a time bound matter. It is averred that despite repeated orders, the department is not producing the records due to which the delay in deciding the case has been caused. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, however, without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioner's claim, I deem CWP No.11948 of 2011 [2] it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Amritsar, to expedite the matter by giving limited opportunities to both the parties to lead evidence. It may be appreciated if the matter is decided within a period of six months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 12, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE