IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24436 of 2008 NASEEMA, WIFE OF LATE ARSHAD ALAM, R/O VILLAGE CHANDERDEI, P.S. ARARIA, DISTT. ARARIA. --------- PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SHAKILURRAHMAN, SON OF SHAFIKURRAHMAN 3. MAHBOOB ALAM, SON OF TETRU BOTH R/O VILLAGE CHANDRADEI, P.S. ARARIA, DISTT. ARARIA. ------- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 02.05.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner who is the Informant is aggrieved with the order dated 24.4.2008 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in Araria P.S. Case No. 370 of 2006 by which cognizance under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code only has been taken against the Opposite Party No. 3 and it has exonerated the Opposite Party No. 2 of the charges. It has been submitted that even the protest petition pending in the court below, no final order has been passed on the same. Since cognizance is not taken under any offence as such, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter with regard to the Opposite Party No. 3 and since the Magistrate is empowered to disagree with the Final Report, no ground for interference is made out with regard to Opposite Party No. 2. However, the Magistrate concerned is directed to expeditiously pass final orders on the protest petition filed on behalf of the petitioner. With this observation, the application is disposed off. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)