1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 461 OF 2007 Sudamadevi Asarfilal Jaiswal and anr. .. Petitioners Vs. The Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Ors. .. Respondents Mr.K.R.Belosay, A.G.P. for respondent nos.2 CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL & & & K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATED : 15TH JULY, 2008 DATED : 15TH JULY, 2008 DATED : 15TH JULY, 2008 P.C.: 1. None for the petitioners. 2. In the affidavit in reply filed by the respondents, it has been categorically stated that the petitioner is not entitled for any benefit of rehabilitation as her name does not find place in Annexure II. 3. In view of this, this court will not be 2 able to grant any relief to the petitioner. It will be open for the petitioner to agitate the issue before the Competent Authority i.e. the Deputy Collector, Kurla, Mumbai and satisfy the authority of her entitlement to be placed in Annexure II to avail of the benefit. Petition is dismissed. ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( K.U. CHANDIWAL, J ) ( K.U. CHANDIWAL, J ) ( K.U. CHANDIWAL, J )