IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 9109 of 2009 Between: Vanam Madhusudhan S/o. V. Rangaiah R/o. Plot No.39, APAU Colony, Gaddiannaram, Dilsukhnagar Hyderabad, presently residing at 6016, Capriana Common, Fremont, CA 94555, USA, rep. by his GPA Holder, V. Rangaiah, S/o. Late Narasimhulu, R/o. Plot No.38, APAU Colony, Gaddian ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Ch. Venugopal S/o. Ch. Shankeraiah R/o. Plot No.20, Kausalya Estate, Karkhana, Secunderabad. 2 The State of A.P. rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased toto quash the all further proceedings in CCNo.457/2009 on the file of the XIII Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.RAMACHANDRA RAO, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER PSR, J. Crl.P.No. 9109 of 2009 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Y.V.Srinivasan, learned counsel appearing for the first respondent and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is the husband of the victim. There are several allegations against him in the complaint. As such it is not a case where the proceedings against the petitioner can be quashed. 3. The petition is dismissed. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. December 15, 2009. *BVS