Ra (CG) sm iiON’iEiiE smu Ta m“; msrmAJ §-4—ZUUS Shri Rajesh Jain, cate for the petitioner. Sm Sushil Dubev, t. Advocate for the State. Shri Vinav Pandev, U nlV€rSltV . Counsei for the petioner submits that identicai matter bearing W.P.[‘C‘.) No. 8'7 1 2008 (Vishnu Prasad and others —V- State of Chhattisgarh an others} invoiving the similar question has been aiiowed bV 0rd r dated 9-4-2008 and similarorders mat; be passed in this m ‘ also. A o V ' dvocate for Pt. Ravi Shankar Shukia w w m m a r XI—HQ 78 Wmw9C£j N63. 2088 H1 /ag 200 mm (Wu) WWW am 311%?! W113? mmWm WWW‘§WW awfmm PE“‘TION”"R Suriit Singh Kurmali, Sio Bagh Bir - Rae; 331$; agad abeui 25 years, R/o at + RO. Raipur Distt. Bénlmra {Wast Bengal), at pressnt Samar Nagar Rainur (CG) ‘Jernu: RESF§’Tl—‘N"_‘S 1. Stan: of Chhat'tisgarh, through the tary, Deparhnant cf iii$€r Edu ation, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur ‘2. Ravishankar Shukia Uni rsitv, Raipur (CG) through: the ' Lwgl trar; Pandft Ravish‘ “a1" Sh a Universitv, Raipur (CG) 3. T1 Principal, B: “par QG. St. Vine nt Paiiotti Cohege, Kana, mm . w~g~(c)Né- gag?) 0% 200 MW (Wu) mafsam mwm ammm mm WW $affana11i¥1 aDOV€ DI‘aV6I‘. Accordingly, the inst order passed in W.P.(C‘} No directed that the petitione: studies in the institution a1 in B.Ed. examination for 2C 07—08. ‘ the respondents do not oppOSE the Learned counsel for ant petition is aiiowed in terms of . 871/9008 dated 9-4-2008 and it is 7 shall be permitted to continue his 1d ‘ e shaii also be aliowed to appea Sd/— Dhirendra Mishra Judge r