IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE Dated this the 4th Day of June 1998 BEFOiE THE HON 8 BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRASHEKARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO.40980/1995 Between: 1, Shri,Vineet Hingarani, Major 1 Proprietor 1 Bangalore Motor Works, No.4/i, 1st Cross, Hosur Main Road, Opp: Lalbagh Veg. Society, Wilson Garden, Bangalore — 560 027. 2 • Smt .M.C.Jayalakshmi, Land Lord, No.4/i, 1st Cross, Hombegowda Nagar, Banglore — 560 027. 3, Shri Zafurul a, Major, Proprietor, Modern Load Factory, No.2/2, Hosur Road, Wilson gardens, Bangalore 560 027. 4. Shrj,Ramesh, Maj or, No.3/i, 1st Cross, Hombegowda Nagar, Bangalore 560 027. 5. Smt .M .C ,Meenakshi, major, No.3/I, 1st Cross, Hombegowdanagar, Bangalore — 560 027. , . . .2 —2— 6. Shri .V,G.Reddy, major, Proprietor, Embeete tyre Retreading Private Ltd., C .V.R . ui1dings, No.12, Hosur Road, Bang1ore — 560 027. 7. Shri.Gopal keddy, major, Proprietor, Sapthagiri High way Service, No.12/I, Hosur Road, Bangalore — 560 027. ..PETITIONERS (By Sri.S.Rangaswamy, 4dv.) And: 1. The Housing and Urban Development Department, represented by its Secretary, Government of Karnataka, Vidhana Zoudha, Dr. Ambedkar Veedhi, Bangalore — 1 2. The Commissioner, Bangalore Mahanagra Palike, Bangalore City. 3. Shri.Pandiyan, Father’s name not known to the petitioners, major, k/o.Ajaneya Slum, Hombegowda Nagar, Bangalore — 560 027. ...RiSPONDENTS (By Sri.H,J,Sundar Kumar and Sri.t,’.Muraiiohar, Advs. for R—2) e • . . This nt Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a raer , to direct R1 and 2 to take necessary and suitable action as provided for unaer the law to remove! evict the R3 from encroachment/squatting/occupying the public road called the service road 0 Hanbeowda Nagar, which canmenccs from Hosur Main roaa at South connects to siodaiah and Double road at North 1 1st Cross 1 Hombegowdanagat road etc,, This Writ Petition coming on for orders this day 0 the Court made the fol1owing:- ORDER This case was listed for order for payment of process on 11O3,1998. On that day 0 this Court has granted one weeks time to pay process. In spite of the grant of time 1 the petitioner has not paid the process. Therefore 0 again the matter was listed for oroers on 15,04,1998. On 15.04,1998 also this Court has granted one weeks time to pay the process as a last chance, In spite of tne said order 0 the petitioner has not paid the process, rherefore, this Irit Petition is listed for orders te-oay. In spite of the grant of time by this Court on earlier occassions the petitioner has not paid the process. This , , .4 r —4— shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Therefore, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/ JUDGE ç43 F’.— 0 sps/