11.1.2007. Present: Mr.R.Maniktala, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.B.M.Gupta vice counsel for Respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr.C.B.Singh, Deputy Advocate General for respondent No.3. CWP.No.1303/2001. The petitioner was aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not considering him for the post of Professor to which he was entitled to be promoted. In the meantime, an inquiry has been held against the petitioner and he has been dismissed from the service. It is submitted that a writ petition challenging his dismissal is pending in this Court. In these circumstances, the writ petition does not survive and it is accordingly disposed of. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach this Court after the decision of the writ petition challenging his termination. In case the petitioner does succeed, he is at liberty to approach this Court on the same cause of action as pleaded in this petition incorporating all consequential changes. ( Dev Darshan Sud ), J. January 11, 2007(R)