1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 119/2007 Virendrakumar Kasturchand Jaiswal ..vs.. Ravindra Kumbhare and Ors. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Bapat, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deopujari, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 2 to 4 & 7. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA & C. L. PANGARKAR, JJ. DATED : 15 th July, 2008 On petitioner's complaint, Sub Divisional Officer, Gondia, by the impugned order dated 26.07.2007 principally held that the Trust Akhand Ashram is a private Trust and land belongs to the Trust and thereby rejected the complaint filed by the petitioner. The learned A.G.P. appearing for the respondents has pointed out rightly so that alternate remedy under Section 247 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code is available against this order. Even otherwise various factual aspects need to be considered in this matter including the question whether 2 the Trust is private or public as sought to be contended by the petitioner. One thing is very clear that the petitioner, in fact, is a person interested who had lodged complaint against the Management of the so called Trust as referred to above. The question whether the said Trust is a private Trust or public Trust that also needs decision from the appropriate Court/Forum under the Bombay Public Trusts Act. Therefore, keeping all points open, we are not inclined to interfere with the orders passed by the authorities referred to above as an alternate remedy is available. All other prayers, therefore, cannot be granted in the present writ petition. The petition is disposed of accordingly with liberty. JUDGE JUDGE kahale