\ [7 . rim! §§3§h Ei§ _ 6/2/ a);— IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH @@ 5‘&éL W.P. N0. /06 Lg”) PETITIONER Purushhottam Nayak, S/o Late Shri Khemnath Nayak Aged about 60Yrs. Upper Division Teacher, Presently posted at, Govt. Girls Middle School, Kodhatarai, Block Pusoor, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT l. State of C.G. ‘ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE ‘ J A CONSTITUTION WRIT WRITS OF INDIA ORDER FOR ISSUANCE DIRECTIONS OF APPROPRIATE ETC. v i ii§sw k Through : Secretary, School Education Department, Q{ D.K.S. Bhawan, 1 /$0 b lg Raipur (C.G.) (T$$9 Ia 2 §Q¢$ W ,g 2. District Education Ofiicer a a $$ow Qs? 9\ w G’ , District Raigarh (C.G.) 3% HEéH CGUgT GF €HHATTE5QA§RH A? $ELA5?UQ 5.5. t Hw‘bie Fi‘u‘. Safish K. A niha‘h‘i J. W. 9‘ {s} Na. 5262 9f 2006 Pa'i’i?ionzr : Pumshho'r‘i’am Nayak V2r'5u3 Respanden'i's : 5mm er? Chha’Hisgar‘h & wheris Shri Manish 5har‘ma, ccurisé! ‘fm‘ Efhe pa‘fi?§aner. Shri Anju Ahuja, Dy. 60w. Advoca‘re far- fhe Sfafe/respmdams. QgaER (Passed on 4” October, 2606) 1. Learned cauwsz! far ‘i’he pefi'mner‘ submi'rs 'E'hu’E‘ 141a pefifianzr wa$ warking as‘ Upper Division Tgacher in @ovammen'f GMS M%dd!e Echoah Kodhammi, Blotk PUSDor‘, Disfricir Raigurh. 2. 8y +F2a impugne& ordar’ dafeé 15.8.2066 {Amgxure WE), the pe?$+ioner has baen "rmnsferried as Assisfan? Teaéher' er} Jmpad i’rmsary Schw! Kirda, Jijaipur, Janjgir Champa. 3‘ Th2 sole cgMen‘finn of {earned counsel appearing 1‘or 1'he pe?§?icner is 'E’hcr? $2 pef§+ien2r has been fransferr‘ed 1‘0 %ow2r pas? 0f Assismnf Tecshar when he was admi'HedSy workéng as Upper- Divi§i0n Teacher. By vir'me of 1+:e crder da+ad 29i200$ (Annexum P/Z), *he befifionen in 'fhis {Jeri-Hon, has prayed *far Mo—fsw reiiefs, ana is quaskhg of 3%? 3b £13 impugned Trwsfer order da+ed 13.8.2696 (Annexure P/l) and second is seeking a direcTian agains? fhe respawenf N0. i m aibw +he pe+§+irmer 1'0 perform his dufias as Upper- Division Teacher m” ihe 9M piace cf pasiing. . 50 far as ihe impugried iransfer arder dm‘ed 18.8.2966 is camemzd, The peiifiomr' has no? made em a case Thaw fhe impugmé frarisfer order passed is maia fide or fhe “imnsfer' order was passad by incompz‘i’en'f guiheri'i’y' oi“ There is no vioiai’icn av? any sm'i'mar‘y ruies, circuiar's eic. or 1412 same is arb H'mry. . Leamed csunsei appearing for- fhe pei’iiioner“ reiies on The fruns-i'er paiicy dm‘ad 26m May, 2906 (Annexm-e W3) and submifs fha'? f'nere was a ban on transfers. Leamed counsei hns compiei’eiy ignored Ciauge-E'cf ‘Hnz Transfer poiicy, which ciaariy indicaies film? in cage 0f adminis‘im'i'ive exigency, 'i’he imi‘isfer‘ m‘ cm empioyee cai'i be macie in ca-wdina'iiGn wiih ‘i‘he Chief Mii‘iis'i'ev. The impugmd imnsfei‘ order is endorsed 4:5 ihe affice of ihe Chief MiniS‘i‘er‘, which cieai'iy inciice'ies firm? ihe impug‘r’ied “transfer was pessed iii co—ordinai'ion wi‘i’n ihe €hief Mifxisiei‘. Learneci ccunsei eppearing for ’ihe Siaie/respandenfs aiso suppoia'is: +his view‘ Thus, There is m reason +9 imei'fer‘e wi'ih 'ihe wens-fer" 9f 'i’i‘ie pe'iifioner. : 3 7 6. 75¢ far ag 'fhe "ex? submissbn Wm”! regard 1‘9 work m“ +hg paiifianer as Upper Diviséen Teacher is concerned, the said issue cams? be decided ir1 This pex‘i‘fien. If if is s9, +he pe’fHiamr may make a r‘apresemafian, if sa advEsed, ‘fo fhe Mgher aui'hori‘fies fer pfaaing him appropriai’eiy', kezping in View his gig-ms. In 'H'ie evem, The represenmi’im is made by The peii‘rioner, The comemed au‘i’hariiizs are directed ’E’e carxsider iha same cmd pass appropria're or-a'er, irs accnrdance wish iaw, cm ifs awn merii‘s, wif‘nis a period 6f 'ihrea weeks {Pom ’i‘he dais sf receip'i‘ of ihe reprassn'mfion. '2’. As a resui'i, "this peiii’ien siands disposed of. Bablu Sd/- Sa‘tish K. Agnihoh‘i Judge