IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.141 of 2011 MOHAMMAD SUBHANI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 02. 19.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is for quashing the Gaya Mufassil police Station Case No. 40 of 2010 registered for the offence under Section 304 and Section 345 of the Explosive Substance Act. It is submitted that admittedly the house of the petitioner was damaged to a large extent on account of blasting of the gas cylinder. However the allegation is that house got destroyed on account of explosion of bomb in which the son of the petitioner died. It is further submitted admittedly petitioner was not even present in the house. Learned counsel for the State submits that in this case supervision of the case was done by the Superintendent of Police, Gaya who has observed that the involvement of the petitioner who happens to be the father of the deceased is ruled out. Notwithstanding the rival submissions of the parties, let the investigation of the aforesaid police case be completed expeditiously without unnecessary delay and upon completion of the investigation police report be submitted forthwith. Till the submission of the police report, no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner in connection with Gaya Mufassil P.S. Case No. 40 of 2010. The writ application accordingly stands disposed of. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)