HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No. 5451 of 2009 O R D E R: The Petitioners 1 and 2 /A1 and A2 are accused of offences punishable under Sections 323, 420 and 506 /34 IPC in crime No. 143 of 2009 of Habeeb Nagar Police Station, Hyderabad. Private complaint filed by the 2nd respondent, the XVI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad referred the complaint to the police for investigation. As the matter now stands, there is no dispute about father of the 2nd respondent entering into Agreement for Sale in respect of house property with the accused. A-2 is nephew of A-1. 2. It is alleged that sale consideration under the agreement was Rs.4,90,000/- and that father of the 2nd respondent paid Rs.1,40,000/- and Rs.50,000/- thereunder. Father of the 2nd respondent died on 23-08-2001. It is alleged that when the 2nd respondent approached A1 and A2 with balance of sale consideration, they were postponing and threatening the 2nd respondent with dire consequences and that on 2-5-2009 A1 and A2 abused the 2nd respondent in filthy language and threatened him with dire consequences and also kicked the 2nd respondent and gave blows to him when he requested for execution of registered sale deed after receiving balance of sale consideration. 3. It is contended by the petitioners’ counsel that false case was foisted against the petitioners out of whom A-1 is an old and infirm person. Truth or falsity of the allegations cannot be subject matter of this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. It is further contended that as per Clause (4) of the Agreement, sale deed has to be executed and registered only after clearing all litigations on the property and that there is second appeal pending with regard to the same property. It is also stated by the petitioners’ counsel that the petitioners are willing to execute a registered sale deed. If it is done, then the entire matter can be compounded by the parties. Without doing so, the petitioners wanted to litigate this matter. In the circumstances, I do not find any valid or legal reasons to quash FIR at this stage. 4. In the result, the criminal petition is dismissed. _________________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J Dt. 29-10-2010 Mjl/*