IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.24 OF 2006 IN MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.96 OF 2002 Smt.Malti Vijay Kane & Ors. ...Applicants Versus Sudhakar Trimbak Papalkar ...Respondent ...... Ms.Gauri Godse for Applicants. Mrs.Sonia Miskin for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH 10, 2006. MARCH 10, 2006. MARCH 10, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Although explanation offered in this Application is not acceptable, as the litigant should not suffer for the mistake of the Advocate, Application allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b), on condition that the Advocate on record shall personally pay cost quantified at Rs.750/- (Rupees Seven Hundred Fifty) to the High Court Legal Services Committee within one week from today. : 2 : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.