(-1-) hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 705 OF 2009 ALONG WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 3220 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus M/s. Bajaj Electricals Ltd. ... Respondent Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant. None for Respondents. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE, JJ. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2009 DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2009 DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . There is delay of 624 days in preferring the appeal. Apart from the cause shown which in our opinion does not amount to sufficient cause, the question of law as framed in the appeal memo is nothing but reappreciation of facts. Considering the same motion does not amount to sufficient cause and hence, the same is dismissed. . As the motion is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)