IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2949 of 2009 AMIT KUMAR, son of Sri Chandra Bhushan Singh, resident of Mohalla :B.M.P. -7 Bheriya Rahika, P.S. Katihar, District Katihar Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 20.3.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 63 of the Copy Right Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that on the fateful day, shops of the three accused persons, namely, the petitioner, Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Kumar Singh and Ramesh Bihani were inspected by the authorized person of Mico company and it was found that duplicate filter of the Company was being sold in the shop. Appreciating the nature of allegation, Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Kumar Singh and Ramesh Bihani have been admitted to the privilege of bail in the event of arrest by another Bench of this Court so submitted the counsel for the petitioner. It is further submitted that his case is also similar to that of Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Kumar Singh and Ramesh Bihani. Let the court below verify whether the shop of the petitioner, Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Kumar Singh and Ramesh Bihani was searched on the fateful day and from the shop of the three accused persons duplicate filter of Mico company was seized and if those two co-accused have been admitted to the privilege of bail in the event of arrest, then petitioner, Amit Kumar be also given 2 similar treatment, provided he surrenders in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Katihar (T) P.S. Case No. 187 of 2008 within four weeks from today. Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioner. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)