3(1^1 qff wirsn^i ?1!U^^ ?N^ ^ST ^WW^, w^w\ic, F^viW^ Writ Pet PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1. 9. 4. Nageshv about Uproda, State Departn DKS Bh, The Sanchall Up-Sand Korba, Pasu Uproda; t>f Ghhattisgarh, Through Secretai-y, ;nt Pasu Chikitsa Sewaye, Mantralaya ^wan, Raipur (CG) Writ Petitioa U/A 226/ S.B. HON'BLE SHRI DHIREND 13.10.2008 Mr. Bharat Rajput, coun^i Ms. Smitha Ghai, PL for The petitioner, by the ins|t the respondents for paying I^i consequential benefits wifti iat^i Grievance ofthe petition^) davs was wifhheld on fhe unauthorizedlv froin his dutie; Aiuiexure P/2. However, the pe|t of his salary vide Annexure P/ P/4 dated 17.4.2007, addre^ ^>i<lllci4l'i <tTP:7^ "^f fei^ ^j^R i?3iRiH3n^r kion (Sl No.5659/2008 |ar Maravi, S/o Shri Bahadur Singh, aged years, g/o Village Kendai, Block Podi- ]Tah. Katghora Distt. Korba (CGj IVersus •anchalak Pasu Chikitsa may Ghadi Chowk Raipur (CG) Sewave. halak, Pasu Chikitsa Sewave, ITI Colony 'istt. Korba (CG) hikitsa Adhikari, Kendai, Block Podi- Tah. Katghora, Distt. Korba (CG) .27 ofthe Constitution oflndia 2A MISHRA.^J. •l for the petitioner. ic State. taat petition has p-rayed for direction. to pending saiaiy of 16 months and rest. r is fhat salaiy ofthe petitioner for 493 aUeeatiou that he retaained absent for fhe aforesaid period as detafled in iitioner represented agaiust withholdin^ 3, fhe respondent No.4 vide Annexure ised to fhe Dy. Director, Veterm.ary ^FS/! 97—3/2008—10,000. ^?^s® XI-HG—7S 3n^i w W\* "^sn 3TT^?T sti+thh G 'S^ ^{WM^, Btll'M'IS, fa|CTI<-iy,< HWV\\ a>*rra» ^t, 200 sn^i 'T^q? ('yfj'i^) TOnwgtoai^i 2- Services, Distt. Korba, forward^ even fheii his wifUield salarv w4 Learaed counsel for fhd pressiag fhis petition at this sta^ a detafled representation befon^ grievajices raised in this peti.^ decided by ttie concerued authi): law. Ms. Smifha Ghai, leamed objection ifthis petition is dispo^ In view of above subinissl fhe instaut petition is disposed a detailed represen.tation befor^ ;rifivances raised in fhis petitioi) fhe same shaU be decided expe^: six weeks froni the date of recel inerits, ia accordauce withlaw. <=hi^<ilt 'RTO^if ^f l^zt' <f<n^.i< ^aifiiqaiitg pd revised pay-data of the petitioner, s not reteased. petitiofier subinits that he is not ge, however, he prays for liberty to file i fhe respondent No.3 raising all his tion, which inay be considered and irity expeditiously in accordaace with ^oiuisel appearing for fhe State has no ,ed ofwith fhe aforesaid liberfy. ^on of learaed counsel for the parties, )fwith liberty to the petitioner to inake ^ fhe respondent No.3 raising att his \.. On such representation beiag inade, iitiously, preferably witTiin a period of ipt of such representation, on its own Sd/- DhirendraMista Judge a