IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37339 of 2009 SANTOSH JAISWAL @ JITENDRA KUMAR, S/O CHANDESHWAR R/O OF VILL-TARWARA (G.B. NAGAR),PS- TALWARA DISTT- SIWAN---------------PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR--------------OPP. PARTY ----------- 4 4.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is in custody since 19.12.2007 in connection with Muzaffarpur Rail P.S. Case No. 26 of 2007. The offence alleged against the petitioner is under sections 328, 307, 379, 411/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with sections 8 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Submission of learned counsel is that for the offence the petitioner is in custody for a substantial long period of time and trial is moving at a snail’s pace. If the petitioner is enlarged on bail he is willing to cooperate in the rest of the trial and shall not abscond. Keeping the period the petitioner has remained in custody, let the petitioner, namely, Santosh Jaiswal @ Jitendra Kumar be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge Vth, Muzaffarpur in connection with Muzaffarpur Rail P. S. Case No. 26 of 2007. One of the sureties will be executed by one Seema Devi, who is said to be the wife of the petitioner and has sworn the present affidavit in the bail application and the other surety by a government servant belonging to Muzaffarpur where the trial of - 2 - the case is going on. Both the sureties will be duly verified by records and on taking their affidavits in this regard. The petitioner is further directed to appear before the trial court on each and every date fixed in the case either through himself or through his advocate. Failure to do so may entitle the court below to take away the privilege of bail. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)