IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2009 / 29TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 20241 of 2009(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. MOLY ABRAHAM, PUTHENPARAMBIL, AMAYANNOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM, M.NO. 1909. 2. K.P.THOMAS, S/O.PILO, KATTADIYIL, AMAYANNOOR, M.NO.10998. 3. KURIAN IYPE, S/O.IYPE, VADAKKECHILAMBASSERIL, AMAYANNOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM, M.NO.2104. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE AYARKUNNAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, AYARKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM. 2. K.K.MOHANAN, GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL OFFICER,AGRICULTURAL DEBT WAIVER & DEBT RELIEF SCHEME 2008, THE AYARKUNNAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, AYARKUNNAM. 3. THE KOTTAYAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, KOTTAYAM. 4. JOINT REGISTRAR (AUDIT) CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KOTTAYAM. 5. THE REGIONAL OFFICER, NABARD, REGIONAL OFFICE, TRIVANDRUM. 6. THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRIVANDRUM. 7. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL, NEW DELHI. /2/ ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN,SC,K.S.CO-OP BANK FOR R6 R3 BY ADV. SRI. T.A SHAJI BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSHKUMAR ASG SRI. P. PARAMESWARAN NAIR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/07/2009 A/W. WP(c).No.20282/09 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).Nos.20241 & 20282 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of July, 2009. JUDGMENT The petitioners in these writ petitions, defaulters to the Ayarkunnam Service Co-operative Bank Ltd, first respondent herein claim that by Exts.P2 in WP(c).No. 20241/09 and P3 in WP(c). No.20282/09, they have claimed the benefit of Debt Waiver and Debt Relief Scheme, 2008 and that orders on these applications have not been passed. It is with this grievance that these writ petitions have been filed and seek a direction for considering the representations. Taking into account the above, these writ petitions are disposed of directing that, if the applications stated to have been made by the petitioners have been received and are pending, respondents 1 and 2 shall consider those applications and pass orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of he judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the aforesaid respondents for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) vi JUDGE