WP(C) 1976/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I A ANSARI Pursuant to an advertisement, inviting applications for appointment to the posts of Junior Assistant, in the establishments of District Employment Exchange, all over the State of Assam, the petitioner, who belongs to the Scheduled Tribe (Pl ains) [in short, ’ST (P)’], participated in the written test held, on 13.02.2011 , in the district of Dhubri, the petitioner’s name having been forwarded by the District Employment Exchange, Dhubri. As far as Dhubri district is concerned, i t was allotted, altogether, two posts - one of the posts being unreserved and th e other reserved for ST(P) candidate. By a notification, dated 26.12.2011, the r espondents have published the result of the written test, held on 13.02.2011, co ntaining names of 12 (twelve) persons, who have been called for interview/viva v oce. The petitioner’s grievance is that the select list does not include any ST (P) candidate and, hence, the petitioner has put to challenge the said select li st by making this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi a. What needs to be noted, with regard to the above, is that according to t he advertisement, in question, a written test, for 100 marks, was to be held and only those candidates, who could be successful in the written test, were to be called for typing/computer test and viva voce. In the case at hand, as the peti tioner’s name does not figure in the select list, the petitioner has, obviously, not qualified in the written test. It is also not the petitioner’s case that i t is only the petitioner, who could have qualified in the written test from amon gst the ST(P) candidates. Situated thus, this Court is of the view that the mere fact, that the pe titioner’s name does not appear in the select list aforementioned, whereby the q ualified candidates have been called for viva voce test, would entitle the petit ioner to any relief. However, it is, now, submitted on behalf of the petitioner, that the pet itioner seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and that the petitione r would make appropriate representation, addressed to the respondent No. 2, name ly, Director, Employment and Craftsman Training, Government of Assam, requesting for making available the marks, which have been obtained by the ST(P) candidate s, including the petitioner, in the written test aforementioned and that the res pondent No. 2 may be directed by this Court to make available to the petitioners the marks as may be requested by the petitioners. To the submissions, so made, no convincing objection could be raised on behalf of the respondents. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty granted to the petiti oner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advis ed. The petitioner may also make representation to the respondent No. 2, namely , Director, Employment and Craftsman Training, Government of Assam, as contended on his behalf, and if such a representation is made, the respondent No. 2 shall do the needful, in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the d ate of receipt of the representation. While making the representation, the peti tioner may enclose, therewith, a certified copy of this order alongwith a copy o f the writ petition and annexure(s) thereto.