( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.2 OF 2008 REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.2 OF 2008 REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.2 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.427 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.427 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.427 OF 2006 Biddle Swayer Ltd.Mumbai. .. Petitioner V/s Chemical Employees Union & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.P.K.Rele with Mr.S.K.Rele and Mr.Vinod Tayade i/by Mr.Piyush Shah for the Petitioner. Mr.Harshad Shaikh i/by M/s.Sanjay Udeshi & Co.for Respondents. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : 16th February, 2008. DATE : 16th February, 2008. DATE : 16th February, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Counsel for Respondent No.1. Mr.Rele, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner undertakes to get the above Petition numbered within a period of two weeks from today. The learned Counsel for Respondent No.1 has contended that the above Review Petition itself is not maintainable. 2. Perused the Review Petition and our judgment dated 11th April, 2007 passed in the Writ Petition No.427/2007 and the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of District Redcross Society V/s.Babita Arora & District Redcross Society V/s.Babita Arora & District Redcross Society V/s.Babita Arora & Ors. - 2007 (114) FLR 1040. Ors. - 2007 (114) FLR 1040. Ors. - 2007 (114) FLR 1040. We do not find that the aforesaid judgment of the Supreme Court holds any different view than the view which we have taken by our judgment dated 11th April, 2007. ( 2 ) 3. Under these circumstances, the above review petition is totally devoid of merits and the same stands dismissed. 4. We make it clear that we have not gone into the merits or demerits in the above Writ Petition No.427/2006 as we were only concerned with regard to the conflicting judgments of the two learned Single Judges. 5. The learned Single Judge is at liberty to decide the Writ Petition on its own merits in accordance with law and after taking into account our judgment dated 11th April, 2007 referred to above, as well as the aforesaid judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of District Redcross Society V/s. Babita Arora & Ors. District Redcross Society V/s. Babita Arora & Ors. District Redcross Society V/s. Babita Arora & Ors., and the factual background of the said Writ Petition. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) J.) J.)