HIGH COURT OF CHHA1TISGARH AT BILASPUR PETTHONER RE8PONDENTS AttHt WRI1 PEIinON (C) N^S491 of2W7 Smt Sarita Devi Jagat W/o - Ramkumar aged about 32 years, R/o - Viilage Ghuiu, P.S. Chakarbhata, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Tbrough the Superiatendent of Poliee, Bilaspur, Distriet Bilaspur(C.G.) 2. The Station House OfBcer, Police Station, Civil Line, Distriet BUaspur (C.G.) 3. Ramsharikar Tiwari, Head Constable, P.S. CivB Line, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Nareiidra Kosle S/'o Sukluiev Kosle, aged about 36 years, R/o- Village - Ghum, P.S. ChakarbhaEa, Dyteiet Baaspur (C.G.) 5. Rakesh SataMiuS/o Budhare aged Aout 22 years, R/o Ameri, P.S. Civil Une, Distotct Bilaspur (C.G.) 6. Clihote S/o Bharat Satnami, age 20 years, R/o Ameri, P.S. Civil Line, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrrUTION OF INDIA SB:iI<m'MeStan8at»shi<"J^@ffltutrt.J, Present: Shri S.K-Bajpai, Advocate tor the petitioner. SSm Sumesh Bajaj, Govemment Advocate forthe State/ respondent No. 1 and 2. ORDER (Passed on 19th day of Septembsr, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel for 1he petitioner submits that the petitioner has lodged an F.I.R. against respondents 4 to 6 for having committed alleged ofFenee ofassautt. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondaits I and 2 subnuts that the F.I.R. has been lodged on 03.08.2007. Therefore, ttie poMce shouldbe given some time to complete Iheir investigation. 3. In view oftiie above statement made by Ifae learned counsel for the State, nothing surrives in ttais matta-. Accordingly, tiiis petition stands diq»osed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agmhotri Judge