IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5892 of 2010 NAND KUMAR YADAV S/O LATE BHUWNESHWAR PRASAD YADAV R/O VILL.- BANDEHRA, P.S.- PASRAHA, DISTT.- KHAGARIA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY OLD SECRETARIAT, BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE SECRETARY PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DIRECTOR, PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KHAGARIA 6. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT RAJ OFFICER, KHAGARIA 7. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER GOGARI, DISTT.- KHAGARIA 8. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER CHAUTHAM, DISTT.- KHAGARIA 9. District Provident Fund Officer, Khagaria 2 06.04.2010 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add the District Provident Fund Officer, Khagaria as respondent no.9. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 30th November, 2007 from the post of Panchayat Sewak under Chautham Block, District Khagaria, the retiral dues as indicated in paragraph 1 of the writ application have not been settled as yet. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the grievance with regard to provident fund dues petitioner - 2 - proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 9 and a separate representation for rest of the grievances before the respondent no. 5. In such view of the matter, in case such representations stating details of unpaid claims are filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claims, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the respective representations shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representations so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable could also be paid to the petitioner along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)