IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.2940 of 2008 Between: A.Mallikarjun Rao ..... Petitioner AND The Union of India, through Central Bureau of Investigation and 2 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s.S.Vani Counsel for the Respondent: Mr.P.Kesava Rao, SC for CBI The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus calling for records from the respondentNo.1 declaring the investigation of respondent No.1 as biased Malicious and malafide consequently to set aside the order in FIR.No.RC.23(A)/06, dated 29-09-2006, issued by respondent No.2 for alleged offences under Section 13 (2) R/W 13 (1) (e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.” At the hearing, Ms.S.Vani, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the subject matter of the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.Nos.3811 and 9531 of 2008, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, are disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 27th June, 2011 lur