IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17983 of 2010 RAM GULAM YADAV @ GULO YADAV @ GULI YADAV . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . with Cr.Misc. No.19268 of 2010 TUNTUN YADAV . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 15/06/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the recitals in the impugned order of rejection are a error of record not borne out from the case diary insofar as the petitioners are concerned. Recitals contained in the order-sheet of a court are sacrosanct. If there is an error of record in the order-sheet the remedy of the petitioners lies in first approaching that very court for having the error of record rectified. If so advised, the petitioners may pursue their remedies accordingly. The applications stand disposed with the aforesaid observations when there is not occasion for this Court to consider the prayer for anticipatory bail on merits at this stage. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)