IN THE ' HIGH COURT k CHHATrlgGARH OF CHHATTISGARH V AT BILASPUR gg'igggm §mm§§ CONTEMPT% (A Nol§ 2 OF zoos (Arising out of an order dated 3.2006 passed in W.P. No.6‘3’1/3/2005 passed by Hon'ble Sh’ri V.K.Shrivastava - J) é % PigTlTlONER lgé2y /Gajendra Pamka, S/o Shrl Brumohan Tahsil— Village and Samri, Post District Umako, - Sarguja P.S. — (C.G.) Ku’smi, . ‘ " Ram, Aged about 21 years, Occupation Versus Mantralaye, Shri B.K.S.Ray, DKS Bhavan, Secretary Raipur (C.G.) Home, 2. Shri O.P.Rathore, Director General of Police, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Shri V.K.Choubey, Superintendent of Police, Sarguja atAmbikapur (C.G.) CONTEMPT OF INDIA PETITION READ WITH UNDER SECTION ARTICLE 10 215 OF w. THE OF THE CONTEMPTS CONSTITUTION OF COURT AC 1 x5 T 197 XI--HC-22 11/01/2007. Shri AS. Knchhawah, 60w. Advoca‘l’e for The npplicanT/Sfa‘re' in M.C.C.No.807/2006 and nom-appiicnn‘r/s‘ra‘re in Confempf Case No. 123/2006. Shri Anup Majumdar, counsel for- The applicnn'r in Confemp‘r Case No.123/2006 and non-applicanf in M.C.C.No.807/2006. Heard. This Court vide urder dafed 07/08/2006 passed in W.P.No.6213/2005 directed The Investigai'ing Officer 1'0 co’mple1'e inves‘i’iga‘rion by nex'r Three ‘ ‘l'hs from The da'fe of regis‘h‘afion of The firs? informafion report M. .C.No. 807/2006 has been fiied mentioning various reasons for exfen ion of fhe period for compiefion of invesfigafion. On the o‘rher h d, Confemp‘r Case No. 123/2006 has been fiied because of non-compHa non-applicanf in M.C.C‘No‘807/2006 and .123/2006 has no objection in case only one monfh's fime as a las oppor‘runi‘l'y is ailowed/furfher fo fhe Inves‘i’iga'l'ing Officer 1'0 com lefe The inves‘rigafion. Admif‘l’edly, 5hri Bala i Rao, Addi‘rional Superinfenden‘l' of Police, Sarguja, is invesfigafing The Having considered The grounds menTioned in The applicaTion for exTension of The period, fur er one rnonTh's Time is aiiowed from Today of fhe above order. Learned counsei for " applican‘r in Confemp'f Case m n e 0 n XLfKl22 L _7 c, .__‘__._, . m Lt $0H6é mm Eai’m'm mmm WWEWW ami-qzm éiwanhr wifh a direc‘rion To Balaj Rao, Addifional Superinfenden‘l' of Police, Sarguja, who is Invesfiga ing Officer ‘l’o c-ompIeTe' fhe 'inves‘riga‘rion wi‘rhin a period of one mon from Today and further direcf ‘ro learned 3m counsel for fhe 51'o1’e ‘l’o co municafe fhe order passed by fhis Cour} for Balaji Roo, Addi‘rionol n‘renden‘l' of Super Police, Sargujo, for‘rhwi‘rh. Wi‘l’h fhe aforesaid ire'c‘i'ion, M.C.C.No.807/2006 and Confemp‘i' Case No. 123/2006 sfand di posed of. Sdl- Vi‘f i V.K.Si1rivastava i Judge