THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED C.R.P.No.4009 of 2010 Dated: 29-01-2011 Between: Nalla Nagarjuna Rao ………..Petitioner and Golla Subbarao …………Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED C.R.P.No.4009 of 2010 ORDER : This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 08-09-2009 in I.A.No.695 of 2008 in O.S.No.444 of 2006, on the file of the Principle Junior Civil Judge, Gurazala. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent herein filed the suit against the petitioner herein for recovery of money. The said suit was decreed ex parte on the ground that the petitioner has not shown any interest to proceed with the suit. After coming to know the fact, the petitioner filed the present petition to condone the delay in filing the petition to set aside the ex parte decree, dated 05-02-2007 contending that due to ill- health, he could not attend the Court. But the Court below dismissed the said petition holding that the petitioner did not file any document to show his bona fide that he is suffering from ailments. Further, there is no medical evidence on record to prove his illness and after a long delay of 283 days, the petitioner come forward with the present petition. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed this revision petition. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondent and perused the record. 4. As seen from the record, it is clear that the Court below after giving reasonable opportunity to the petitioner dismissed the petition. In its order, the Court below observed that the petitioner failed to produce any medical evidence to prove his contention that he was suffering from heart disease and B.P., etc. Further the petitioner also failed to explain the cogent reasons for delay in filing the petition. Considering all these aspects, the Court below dismissed the petition with well reasoned order. Moreover, the learned counsel for the respondent also contended that the petitioner did not pay the decreetal amount till today. 5. Hence, I do not see any illegality or irregulariy in the order passed by the Court below. The revision has no merit and accordingly the same is liable to be dismissed. 6. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________________ January 29, 2011 JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED kvr