BSSm* ^'^S^^^E^fi^^^K »! ^'SS'SXK, CcrP f^ /d^/°.$ :aS BEFORE'. TEIS {•SDBZ& PB.SDSSK S-StaS aDMENISTR^nVB TRIBmAL 0.&. HOSll _OP 1995 AS'PLIcan' .;. D.K.Vecma, son of Late Dr, Ifi-ralal ^erma aged" 54 years» worid.ag as Deputy ComaiissioneE of SaLes T%; (Commercial Tax) Raipur Ver sus RESPOND-E1WS_ : l. Tbe State of Msihya Pradesh through PEiaci-pal SecEefary, Separate Revenus Departinent. Vallabh Bhavan, Bbopal. 2. The Cominl.ssloner Sales lax Indore M.P. jPETITIOH UI-3DER SECTIOl<J.9__QSL.fli-'MNISTS^iy£ TRIBUE&LS i-CS 2285— T'ne Petitioner above nsiaed humbly toegs.to subrait as undec !- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Wnt PetitiQn_(S)J*Io. 1083 rf 2005 Petitioner ' D. K. Verma Versus Respondents The State of Madhya Pradesh (now Chhattisgarh) 8s another (SB: H-on'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) None for the petitioner. Shri P. K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. * O R D ER (oral) ( Passed on this 29th day of October, 2009 ) 1. 2. The niatter is called for hearing twice. On both the occasions none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petidoner may not be interested in prosecudng the matter. In view of the foregoing, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. A copy of this order shall be sent to the petitioner forthwith. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur 7