IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14428 of 2010 AMAR DWIVEDI, SON OF SHANKAR DEO DWIVEDI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 06.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the First Information Report the allegation against the in-laws is that they had committed the murder of the deceased for the ends of dowry. However, from perusal of the case diary and the inquest report it appears that initially the witnesses have stated that the deceased had died a natural death. One witness has stated that the father of the petitioner had borrowed his car for taking the deceased to the Doctor but, unfortunately she was declared dead. Surprisingly, in the post mortem examination report, there is a mention of frothy Nosal bleeding and also marks of finger on the neck. Considering the contradictory physical examination of the deceased and the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 8.10.2009, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, in Dehri (Indrapuri) P.S. Case No. 2 450 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)