IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5064 of 2010 BHOLA PASWAN, SON OF LATE BRAHMDEO PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NARAUNI, P.S. NIMCHAK BATHANI, DISTRICT-GAYA……………………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Ram Chandra Singh, A.P.P. --------- 2. 9.3.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner had gone outside the State to earn his livelihood without permission as a result his bail bonds were cancelled, however, the learned counsel submits that the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial. Petitioner was declared absconder on 15.2.2005. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 26.10.2009. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Bhola Paswan, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten 2 Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Atri P.S. Case No.28/95, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial. If he fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any sufficient cause being shown, the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)