1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3178/2008 Ritukamal Bohra & Ors. vs State of Raj. & Ors. DATE OF ORDER:8.5.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.PS Bhati, for the petitioners. Mr.Rajesh Bhati, Asstt to AAG. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties. A writ petition has been filed by 12 persons for seeking relief that the order dated 31st March, 2008 (Annex.5) be quashed and set aside. By order dated 31st March, 2008 (Annex.5), the services of the petitioners were brought to an end as their term of appointment has not been extended from 31st March, 2008. In this writ petition, on 19th May, 2008 interim order was passed that in the meanwhile and until further orders, the respondents are directed to employ the petitioners as Nurse Grade-II, if they want to fill in the existing vacancies by other persons on contract basis. Then by order dated 14th Oct., 2008 out of 12, 4 of the petitioners have been given appointment afresh after holding interview. According to Learned counsel for the petitioners the rest of the petitioners have not been given any relief and, therefore, their case is separate from the case of those petitioners, who have been given appointment by order dated 14th Oct., 2008 2 (Annex.R/2). The petitioners who have been given appointment vide order dated 14th Oct., 2008 (Annex.R/2) obviously are not aggrieved against the order dated 14th Oct., 2008. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since by order dated 14th Oct., 2008, 4 petitioners have been given appointment and since the remaining petitioners want to get appointment by challenging the order dated 14th Oct., 2008 and that cannot be done in the present writ petition as the petitioners who have been given appointment by order dated 14th Oct., 2008 cannot challenge the order because of the reason they appeared in the interview conducted by the respondents for giving fresh appointment. Therefore, there may be chances of conflict of interest amongst the petitioners, therefore, the present writ petition may be dismissed with liberty to the remaining petitioners to avail the remedy as per law if they are aggrieved against the order dated 14th Oct., 2008. In view of the above, the writ petition of the petitioners is dismissed in view of the subsequent event of passing of order Annex.R/2 whereby the conflict of interest amongst the petitioners developed with liberty to remaining petitioners to challenge the order Annex.R/2 in accordance with law. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-