IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1841 of 2011 MAHMAD MAHMUD SAH S/O SHAH ABIB @ MD. HABIB SAH --- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. COMMISSIONER, BHAGALPUR DIVISION, BHAGALPUR 3. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BHAGALPUR 4. D.C.L.R NAUGACHIA (BHAGALPUR) 5. CIRCLE OFFICER, BIHPUR BLOCK IN THE DISTRICT OF BHGALPUR 6. SAH HABIB @ MD. HABIB SAH S/O LATE SAH MUNGARI 7. MD. AHMAD SAH 8. MD. TAHMAD SAH BOTH SONS OF SAH HABIB @ MD. HABIB SAH ALL R/O VILL- MILKI P.O. & P.S. BIHPUR, DIST. BHAGALPUR --- RESPONDENTS ----------- 02 02.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 25.08.2010, passed by respondent Commissioner (Annexure-3) as also order dated 29.03.2010 passed by the respondent Collector (Annexure-2). The order of the D.C.L.R. dated 19.01.2010 (Annexure-1) is also under challenge. A perusal of the order passed on appeal of the petitioner being LC appeal no. 109/2009-2010 it appears initially the petitioner got his name mutated based on a sale document which was found to be fake and forged. The revision preferred there against stood dismissed by the respondent Commissioner by order dated 25.08.2010 (Annexure-3) on the ground that in view of amendments in the Act and deletion of Section 17 thereof Act the Commissioner had no jurisdiction to entertain second revision against the order of the respondent 2 Collector. In whole of the writ petition there is no pleading and/or averment with regard to the said finding recorded by the respondent Collector in his appellate order dated 29.03.2010. This Court does not find any merit in this application. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)