IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL No.300/2000 Smt.Parwati & Ors. vs. Hamid Khan & Ors. 20.08.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SARRAF Mr.Vinay Mathur on behalf of Mr.G.K. Bhartiya, for claimants appellants. Mr.Anil Jain, ] Mr.Abhishek & Mr.R.C. Sharma, ] for respondents. on behalf of Mr.G.C. Garg ] *** This appeal has been filed against the award dated 24.11.99 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaipur District, Jaipur in motor accident claim case no.424/1995. It is not necessary to narrate the facts of the case as the short controversy is that whether the compensation amount awarded by the Tribunal in this case is fair and reasonable? The deceased Bacchu Singh died in consequence of an accident on 28.9.1995. Learned Tribunal came to the conclusion that the deceased was 40 years old at the time of his death. Learned Tribunal assessed the income of the deceased as Rs.3391/- per month and after making deduction on account of his personal expenses assessed the dependency at Rs.2250/- per month and after adopting a multiplier of 18 assessed the loss of income as Rs.2250X12X18 = Rs.4,86,000/- and after adding Rs.4,000/- for funeral expenses and Rs.25,000/- for loss of affection passed a total award of Rs.5,15,000/- in favour of the claimants appellants. Heard learned counsels for the parties. After hearing learned counsels for the parties and after examining the record I am of the opinion that learned Tribunal has assessed the income of the deceased correctly and the multiplier adopted by learned Tribunal is also quite favourable to the claimants appellants. It is thus clear that the amount of compensation awarded by learned Tribunal is fair and reasonable and there is no ground for enhancement. Consequently, the appeal stands dismissed. (G.S. SARRAF), J.