^ r57 Petitioner HSGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BSLASPUR S.B. HON'BLE SHRi DHiRENDRA MiSHRA. J Contempt Case (0 No. 151 of 2009 Kamai Sindhu Patel, S/o Late Ved Prakash Pate!, aged about 31 years, R/o 369/7, New Shrishti" Blocks, Avantj Vihar, Te!i Bandha, Raipur (CG) Versus Cofitemnors Vijay Kumar Tiwari, Joint Commissioner, Offjce of the Development Commissioner, Vikash Bhawan, Civii Line, Raipur (CG) Present: JVIr. S.P. Kale, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Pushpa Dwivedi, counsei for the respondent. ORAL (30th June, 2010) The instant contempt petition has been fiied by the petitioner aileging therein that the respondent has not decided the representation submitted by the petltioner in violation of the directions issued by this Court vide order dated 21.11.2008 passed in WP(s)No.6459/08. The respondent in his counter-affidavit has categoricaSly stated that the representation has been decided vide Annexure R/1 dated 25th March, 2009. However, unconditional apoiogy has been tendered for delay in deciding the representation. Taking into consideration reply of the respondent and the fact that the representation of the petitioner has already been decided vide Annexure R/1, the unconditjonal apoiogy for delay in deciding the representation js accepted and contempt proceedings are dropped. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge 1^