IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH AND THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 5951 of 2000 Between: Yedlapally Narayana Rao, S/o. Y.V. Satyanarayana Murthy, R/o. Vemavaram, Achanta M, WGDT. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Bhimavaram Division, Bhimavaram, W.G.Dist. 2 The Asst Superintendent of Post Offices, Head Office, Palakol, W.G.Dist. 3 The Post Master General, Vijayawada, Krishna Dist. 4 Varada Venkateswarlu, S/o.Chenna Basava Mallaiah, R/o. A.Vemavaram, Achanta, W.G. Dist. 5 The Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to M.A.309/2000 in R.A.No.29/2000 in O.A.No.668/1999 on the file of Central Admn. Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to allow the petitioner to continue as Extra Departmental Sub Postmaster of A.Vemavaram, Achanta Mandal. WGDT. Central Admn. Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. J. VENUGOPAL RAO Counsel for the Respondents : Mr. SANKA RAMAKRISHANA RAO The Court made the following : ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Eswaraiah) When the matter is called, none appeared for the petitioner and no representation is made. The learned counsel for the respondents is present. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. ______________________ V. ESWARAIAH, J June 23, 2009. ______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J KL/BVS