THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P. NO. 19302 of 1997 Dated: 21-03-2007 Between:- Mallikarjuna Nagaboina s/o N. Narasiah, aged 22 years, occ:Unemployee, R/o Deshaipety village, Hanumakonda (M), Warangal District. …PETITIONER And 1. Vice Chairman & Managing Director, A.P.S.R.T.C. Musheerabad, Hyderabad, 2. The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C. Thurrur Mandal, Warangal District. … RESPONDENTS THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P. No. 19302 of 1997 O R D E R The petitioner in this writ petition has sought for the following substantive relief. “….. Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner’s appointment in any suitable post in terms of G.O.Ms. No. 98, dated 15.04.1986 and Memo. No. 138/P3/38- 8, 788, dated 19-04-1990 under displaced person’s quota as illegal, arbitrary, constitutional and violating the rights under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider and appoint the petitioner in any suitable post for which he is eligible and qualified in terms of G.O.Ms. No.98, dated 15.4.1986, and Memo. No. 138/P3(2) 38-7, 788, dated 19-4-1990.” On 15.03.2007 there was no representation for the petitioner when the matter was called. Even today when the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. Sri Phani Kumar appears for Smt. P. Rajani Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for A.P.S.R.T.C. In view of the consistent absence of the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the cause in the writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for default. No order as to costs. ___________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 21-03-2007 vp