IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DECEMBER 2006 / 29TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 WP(C).No. 33945 of 2006(N) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ SUBRAHMANYA K., (RETIRED HEADMASTER), AUPS, KAJAMALE HOUSE, P.O. KUMBADAJE, KASARGOD - 671 551. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN SRI.T.R.JAGADEESH RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KUMBLA AT BADIADKA, KASARAGOD. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KASARAGOD. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER (SHRI A. J. VARGHESE) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------- W.P.C. NO. 33945 OF 2006 N -------------------------- Dated this the 20th December, 2006 JUDGMENT Petitioner challenges Ext.P3. I feel that the petitioner has an alternate remedy in the form of a petition under Rule 92 Chapter XIV A KER. In such circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing that if the petitioner prefers a Revision Petition under Rule 92 Chapter XIV A KER before the third respondent within three weeks from today, the third respondent will consider the same after hearing the petitioner and take a decision in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the Revision Petition. It will be open to petitioner to rely on Ext.P1 also. K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk.