Q § W 35mg www N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR C.G./ 3 WRIT PETITION No.a?3&© 12006 / Chitrasen Verma, S/o. Late Shri N.S.Verma, Aged about 34 years, R/o Village 85 Post Tohda, Via— Hirmi, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS If”, V, fI State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Sécretary, Department of Panchayat 85 Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan,Mantra-1aya, RAIPUR (c.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Simga District RAIPUR (C.G.) SPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. r n, i v XI—HC-78 m m :N?o&oq.~ .&S.0D. big 20“ W W , W , W WW<W) WWW WWW WW§WW agmm matmm 21.S.2006:- Shri Ashish Shrivastava wit petitianer. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. I respondent N0.1. Heard both the counsel. The main grievance of the p of the fact that he was eligible for Clause (b) of sub-rule 9 of Rule 5 the certificate issued by Principal, Hathbandh, District Raipur dated 3 continuously for 3 years taught in th school i.e. from 22-7-96 to 30-3-99. Perusal of Annexure-P/6 whi h is the list issued for the purpose of interview, at page 39, the name f the petitioner is at S. No.1 in the category of OBC candidate and 1 % marks has not been added on the ground of 3 years teaching experie ce. Prima facie argument ad nced by learned counsel for the petitioner appears to be correct an ’learned counsel for the petitioner is pressing for the stay, and it has een informed that so far after taking interview the merit list of selecte candidates has not been declared, therefore, with the consent of bot the counsel, the following order is being passed. Having heard learned coun clause (b) of sub-rule 9 of rule H rU l h Shri Amit Verma, counsel for the \dvocate takes notice for the State/ etitioner in this petition is that in spite ' 10% marks at the interview as per the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment and Service C nditions) Rules, 1997 (for short 'the Rules, 1997) because the petitione was eligible under this clause as per overnment Higher Secondary School, 43-99 which shows that the petitioner l for the parties and having perused of the Rules, 1997 and experienc certificate dated 30-3-99 issued b he Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary e y XI-HC—78 W W , W , W . WW(W)