IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 13TH AUGUST 2010 / 22ND SRAVANA 1932 LA.App..No. 970 of 2010() ------------------------- LAR.8/2007 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT NO.1 IN LAR: ------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.R.BINDU RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANTS AND RESPONDENT NO.2 IN LAR: ---------------------------------------------------- 1. SREEDHARAN NAIR, T.C.10/1246, KRISHNAN VILASOM, VATTIYOORKAVU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SREEKUMARI, T.C.10/1246, KRISHNAN VILASOM, VATTIYOORKAVU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CHIEF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER, CIVIL ENGINEERING DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF SPACE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ L.A.A.No. 970 OF 2010 ------------------------ Dated this the 13th day of August, 2010 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. We do not find any justification for entertaining this appeal. The property was in Peroorkada village. The acquisition was pursuant to Section 4(1) notification published on 22/4/2004. The Reference Court under the impugned judgment enhanced the land value by 60%. According to us, in view of the decision taken by this Court in L.A.A. No.411/2010 and other cases pertaining to acquisition of property in the same village for the same purpose, the Government cannot have any legitimate grievance regarding the impugned judgment. The appeal will stand dismissed in limine. No costs. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM , JUDGE dpk