1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2682 OF 2009 (Shaikh Arif Vs. The State) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. U.T.Pathan, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. S.P. Daund, APP for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 14/8/2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard Counsel for both the sides. 2. The accused/applicant is in custody from 20th July, 2009 and, thereafter, from 21st July, 2009, he is in magisterial custody remand in Crime No.60/2009. 3. The allegations are; the labours who were deployed at forest under Employment Guarantee Scheme were to receive a specific sum as their wages. However, the accused/applicants herein have taken signature of the labours on the muster and register for having 2 paid excessive amount though the accused/applicant only paid them Rs.150/- and, they have allegedly misappropriated the amount of Rs. 27,100/- from the wages of the legitimate labours. 4. The accused/applicant being in custody and, now in magisterial custody remand, nothing is to be recovered from him. His status to be a jeep driver and resides at the place. No other criminal record. Custodial interrogation of the accused/applicant is not now warranted. Hence order: (a) The accused/applicant (Shaikh Arif s/o Shaikh Abdul Karim) be released on his furnishing P.R. bond and surety in the sum of Rs. 5,000/- (Rs.five thousand). (b) The accused/applicant, after his release, shall attend concerned Police Station on every Sunday between 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. till filing of the chargesheet. 3 (c) The accused/applicant shall attend the court proceedings, shall not influence the witnesses, particularly, the labours who have put up their grievance against the accused/applicant. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/2682-09crapl