IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 6TH JUNE 2011 / 16TH JYAISHTA 1933 Tr.P(C).No. 39 of 2011() -------------------------------- OP.183/2010 of FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM .................... PETITIONERS: -------------------- 1. JOSEPH JOSEPH @ MANOJ,AGED 35, S/O.A.J.JOSEPH,AKKAKUNNEL HOUSE,NIRAMALPURAM, CHUNKAPPARA,KOTTANGAL MURI AND VILLAGE,MALLAPPALLY TALUK,PTHANAMTHITTA DIST.REP.BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER OF SRI. A.J.JOSEPH,S/O.P.J.JOSEPH,AKKAKUNNEL (H), NIRMALAPURAM,CHUNKAPPARA,KOTTANGAL MURI AND VILLAGE,MALLAPPALLY TALUK,PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 2. A.J.JOSEPH,AGED 64, S/O.P.J.JOSEPH AKKAKUNNEL HOUSE, NIRAMALAPURAM,CHUNKAPPARA, KOTTANGAL MURI AND VILLAGE,MALLAPPALY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.P.HARIDAS SMT.S.SIKKY RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- MINI JOSE,D/O.N.A.JOSEPH,NADAKKAL THASHA HOUSE,VELLIYAPPALLI P.O, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM-686 574,REP.BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI.BIBI JOSE,S/O.N.A JOSEPH, NADAKKAL THASHA HOSUE,VELIYAPALLI P.O, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM. ADV. SRI.M.J.THOMAS THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: smt K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------ Tr.P(C)No.39 OF 2011 ------------------------------ Dated this the 6th day of June, 2011 ORDER The petitioners are respondents 1 and 2 in OP No.183 of 2010 on the file of the Family Court, Kottayam. The said Original Petition was filed by the wife of the first petitioner for realisation of gold ornaments and cash. It is stated that the first petitioner filed OP No.588 of 2009 on the file of the Family Court, Thiruvalla for divorce. 2. The prayer in this Transfer Petition is to transfer OP No.183 of 2010 from the Family Court, Kottayam to the Family Court, Thiruvalla. 3. It is not in dispute that in OP No.183 of 2010 recording of evidence commenced. The ground for transfer is that the Judge, Family Court, Kottayam, is prejudiced against the petitioner. It is also alleged that the cross-examination of PW1 was not allowed. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted Tr.P(C)No.39 OF 2011 2 that the learned Judge against whom the allegations have been made was transferred to another station and therefore, it is not necessary to transfer the case. The Transfer Petition has become unnecessary by passage of time. The Transfer Petition is accordingly, closed. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE. cms