IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 23381 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: September 6, 2010. Tej Pal and others ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. K.S.Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amandeep Singh, A.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.265 dated 24.07.2010, under Sections 148/149/323/324/326/506 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Nissing, District Karnal. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 13.08.2010 passed the following order:- “Crl.M.No.41632 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-23381 of 2010 CRM No.M-23381 of 2010 Argues that no injury has been attributed to petitioner nos.1 to 3, namely, Tej Pal, Jhirmal Singh and Dilbagh and injury attributed to Malak Singh on the person of Gurdeep Singh is simple in nature. Further argues that main accused in this case is Joginder Singh, to whom main injury with Barchi has been attributed to the complainant. Further contended that it is a case of version and cross-version and that petitioner no.1 has also received five injuries including grievous one. Notice of motion for 6.9.2010. However, petitioners are directed to join the investigation and in case they are arrested, they shall be released on interim bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. At this stage, Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that they have already joined the investigation pursuant to said order dated 13.08.2010 It has also been stated by learned counsel for the State that petitioners have joined the investigation and that they are no more required for any custodial interrogation. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of Tej Pal, Jhirmal Singh, Dilbagh Singh and Malak Singh, is accepted and order dated 13.08.2010 granting interim bail in favour of the petitioners is, hereby, made absolute subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. 2 CRM No.M-23381 of 2010 The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) September 6, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 3