{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2187 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.159 OF 2009 Mrs.Renuka Jyotiram Lokhande & Another APPLICANTS VERSUS Jyotiram Ankushrao Lokhande RESPONDENT ....... Mr.D.S.KUdale h/f Mr.P.G.Rodge, Advocate for applicants ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 12 th November 2009 PER COURT: 1. By the present application, the applicants have prayed to condone the delay of 11 days caused in preferring the criminal revision. Notice of this application was issued to the respondent and the report shows that the notice is served on him. In spite of service of notice, the respondent failed to appear before this Court to show cause as to why the delay should not be condoned. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and for the reasons stated in the application, which are sufficient to condone the delay, the delay is condoned. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause “B” to the application. Application stands disposed of accordingly. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/criapln2187-09 {2} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.159 OF 2009 Mrs.Renuka Jyotiram Lokhande & Another APPLICANTS VERSUS Jyotiram Ankushrao Lokhande RESPONDENT ....... Mr.D.S.KUdale h/f Mr.P.G.Rodge, Advocate for applicants ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 12 th November 2009 PER COURT: 1. As the delay caused in preferring this criminal revision is condoned, by allowing criminal application No.2187/2009, the registry to register this criminal revision application. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Issue notice to respondent, returnable on 10.12.2009. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/criapln2187-09