- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3614 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.3614 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.3614 OF 2005 Manoj Rijhwani ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.Girish Kulkarni for the Applicant Mr.R.Y.Mirza,A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 15,2005. : JUNE 15,2005. : JUNE 15,2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Counsel appearing for the parties. The Application for grant of bail made by the Applicant was earlier rejected by the learned Sessions Judge. The Application filed by the Applicant in this Court came to be rejected by order dated 17th January 2005. The Applicant filed Special Leave Petition in the Apex Court for challenging the order passed by this Court. While dismissing the Special Leave Petition the Apex Court observed that the Special Leave Petition is dismissed without prejudice to the remedy of the Petitioner to renew the bail Application after some time. 2. The learned A.P.P. submitted that the if the Applicant is entitled to renew the bail application as per the directions of the Apex Court, the Applicant will have to approach the Court of the learned Sessions Judge. 3. In view of the objection raised by the learned A.P.P. this Application is not entertained. It will be open for the - 2 - Applicant to move the Application for bail before the learned Sessions Judge in accordance with the observations made by of the Apex Court. If such application is made the same shall be decided by the learned Sessions Judge in accordance with law. 4. Subject to observations made above, Application is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE