1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty First day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16990 of 2011 S.T.SUVAITHARAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. (CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. G.THALAIMUTHARASU Advocate For Respondent : MR.T.MOHAN, Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 498(A), 420 and 406 I.P.C. and seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Mr.T.Mohan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that only petition enquiry is pending against the petitioner on the basis of the complaint preferred by one N.Anitha. 3. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was frequently called for interrogation by the respondent police and as such he is having apprehension of arrest and this is a case of dispute between the husband and wife. 4. It is seen that only petition enquiry is pending against the petitioner on the basis of the complaint preferred by one N.Anitha. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is having apprehension of arrest as he has been called for interrogation by the respondent police frequently and this is a case of dispute between the husband and wife, this Court is constrained to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nagercoil, on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Magistrate or to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 5.30 p.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter, he shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 21/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, NAGERCOIL. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. G.THALAIMUTHARASU Advocate SR.No.45586 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16990 of 2011 Date :21/12/2011 RJ/23.12.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/