IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2008 / 27TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 5616 of 2008(R) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SHEEJA THOMAS, THAKADIYELPARAMBIL, CHANANIKAD, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.5616/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DT. 21.12.03. EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT. 21.3.07 IN M.V.A.A. NO.139/07. /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 5616 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: MARCH 17, 2008 JUDGMENT What is sought for in this writ petition is the implementation of Ext.P2. By Ext.P2 judgment, permit was ordered to be granted subject to settlement of timings and this judgment has not been implemented, complains learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The learned Government Pleader, on the other hand, submits that it has been decided to challenge Ext.P2 and therefore it has not been implemented. 3. Taking into account the fact that Ext.P2 was issued as early as on 21st March 2007 and that almost a year has passed, there is absolutely no justification for not implementing Ext.P2. I, therefore, direct that the 1st respondent shall in implementation of Ext.P2, convene a timing conference and issue the permit that is ordered to be granted. However, I clarify that any such grant of WP(C) 5616/08 Page numbers permit shall be subject to any proceedings that might be instituted against Ext.P2. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-