IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14534 of 2005 Ram Swarup Rajak, Son of Late Kanhai Rajak, resident of Village-Dariapur, P.O. Hathidah, P.S. Hathidah, District-Patna -------------------------- Petitioner Versus 1. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Regional Office Employees Provident Fund Organisation, R-Block , Road No.6,Patna 2. The General Manager, Hindustan Fertilizer Corporation Ltd. Barauni Unit, P.O. & P.S. Barauni Urvarak Nagar, District- Begusarai 3. The Senior Personnel Officer, Hindustan Fertilizer Corporation, Barauni Unit, P.O. & P.S. Barauni Urvarak Nagar, District- Begusarai --------------------- Respondents. ---------------------------------- 03 09-09-2011 The present writ petition has been listed under the heading for orders on office notes on the point as to whether the writ petition can proceed further even in absence of Respondent no.1 since writ petition has already stood rejected against Respondent no.1 due to non-compliance of the peremptory order of this Court. Sri R.S.Pradhan, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent no.1 submits that it is true that due to non- compliance of the order, the writ petition stood rejected against Respondent no.1, but Respondent no.1 has already filed counter affidavit long back in the month of June .2006. It was indicated therein that the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. Sri Naresh Dass , learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the statement made by Sri Pradhan, learned Senior Counsel for Respondent no.1. He also submits that the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. It is true that the writ petition has been listed under the heading for orders, but keeping in 2 view the stand taken by the parties, the Court is of the opinion that the entire writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as the same has become infructuous. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)