HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No.7682 of 2009 ORDER: The substantive grievance in this writ petition is that the official respondents are not taking action on the encroachment by the 4th respondent. It is alleged that the 4th respondent has encroached the road portion on the eastern side of her plot by creating permanent structures. The petitioner by representation, dated 28-02-2009, complained to the official respondents about this encroachment. Asserting inaction on the part of the official respondents in removing encroachment of public property, the writ petition is filed. The learned Government Pleader for Assignment has obtained written instructions from the 1st respondent, dated 03-06-2009 which is to the effect that on the complaint of the petitioner, notices under Section 7 of the A.P. Land Encroachment (Extension and Amendment) Act, (25th Act of 1958) (for brevity ‘the Act’), were served on the 4th respondent on 11-05-2009 calling upon the said respondent to show why she be not vacated; the 4th respondent attended the enquiry before the answering respondent and admitted that she had no documents in proof of title to the property. A statement of this effect was recorded from the 4th respondent on 26- 05-2009. Thereafter, an order under Section 6 of the Act was served on the 4th respondent on 30-05-2009 granting of 15 days to remove the structures and if she does not do so, the answering respondent would demolish the structures by employing municipal labour. The petitioner is satisfied with this action taken by the official respondents. As the respondents have initiated the statutory procedure for eviction of the 4th respondent, the grievance in the writ petition does not subsist. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________________ 11th June 2009 KVR