IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19391 of 2010 LAXMAN MAHATO @ LAXUMAN MAHTO son of Dashrath Mahto, R/o village Suksena Dera, Amsar Tola, P.S. Murar, Dist. Buxar …..petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR opp. Party. ----------- 3 12.08.2010 Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution registered under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, though petitioner is not named in the FIR but after arrest by the police he was put on T.I.P and he was identified by three witnesses. From the materials available on record it appears that petitioner is accused in four other cases also. In that view of the matter, this court is not persuaded to accede to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail. The prayer for bail made on behalf of the petitioner is rejected at this stage. It is stated that case is still pending before the C.J.M, Buxar. Learned C.J.M, Buxar is directed to commit the case of the petitioner to the court of Sessions where-after trial of the petitioner may be taken up on priority basis. If the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within a period of one year from the date of commitment, then the petitioner shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J. ) M.Rahman