IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 13747 of 2008 Decided on: 23.2.2011 Sangita Devi …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 6. None for respondents No. 7 and 8. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : In view of the contents of reply, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge February 23, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?