,^ S?| &^1 IN THE HIOH COURT OF CHHATTCSGARH AT BILASPUR ^L^i WRITPETITION (5} NO??.1..7../^^/^0^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS .^^ ^y" <?^A.-"" y Jugendra Kishor Sahu, Son of Late Tej Ram Sahu, aged 22 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, Primary School, Mohgaon, Tahsil Saraipali, 'K R/o. Village Palidih, Post Toresingha, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS 4. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Health Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.), 2. Chief Medical Officer, Mahasamund, bistrict Mahasamund (.C.G.). 3. Block Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.), 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Saraipali, District - Mahasamund (C.&.), THE WRITPETCTION UNDER ARTECLE 226 OF COUNSTITUTCON OF INDIA. The petitioner above-named most respectfully submit as under:- i- ^TT^T^T W\^ 'snf^Y 5t)^i<=h ^Tft^T -3~oc[ '^i41d^, ^Ti1^'li(5, [®i<ni^^< 37?^?T ^f^K ..l/:l.f...c.sj...2^^2>/ ^°'' "Wi^ 200 ^RI^^I 5h*<(cb •i^^' ^TT^T-^Tr^R: Trftn SB : Hon?ble Shri Manindra Mohan Slltrivastava, J. 25-05-2011 titioner. Shri R.S.Patel, counsel for the p( Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, D|y. Advocate General for the State/ respondents No. 1,2 and 3 on advance Heard. The petitioner has filed this pe| ward of Assistant Teacher who diedl application for compassionate appoi|itment and he has been given appointment on the post of Shiksha] submitted that he is entitled to be| according to the policy. Learned State counsel submitted may be given an opportunity of filling| the competent respondent authority, w|aich may be considered on its own merits, in accordance with law. Having considered and withou authority along with a copy of the petiti from today, and on such represent^tion ^i respondent authority shall decide t|^e same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possib^ months from the date of receipt of th\ still remains, the petitioner may avail tl^e remedy available under the law cni^^t 'RpR^rf ^ fe1cst <R?i^i< '^'^Tf^R^^n^T ;opy. as itli^ that for the present, the petitioner 'Si^^SSSS^^^^8i^ representation before |^g ,|fc expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in the opinion of t^iis Court, ends' of justice will be served, if a direction is given to tt| representation raising his grievance ^e petitioner to make a detailed ^efore the competent respondent e preferably within a period of four ig ^^ representation. If any grievance g h CI-HC-22 ~3~^r ^ii<4id1£l. ^•al^^i<o, [®i<ni^y WWTT^RT^ STT^T ^f^ l^/.P. CS-) ^-^^-<S|^-6l| "^' 200 'fN^ST' ^TI^T^T fc^ich 3Tii^I $t)^ich ^rftc? ^fV^^)T^ ^TT^T ^rIT^R: Tlf^T --L- With the aforesaid observation, tll In view of above, I.A.No.l, and I.A| Certified copy as per rules. <^l<Ll(Ql<flr1 'RTR^Tf ^ fe^ <M'^K iT^Tf^R^TT^T [is petition stands disposed off. j.No.2 stand disposed off Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge 18 IBMI r:^ -^