^ c H2GH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition iArt.227) hio.1569 of 2016 Petitioner Bhagat Ram Son of SuRaiu Ram Appeliant Sahu, aged about 38 years, R/o. Vliiage - Bhakhara, Tahsil Kurud, Distrtet Dhamtsri (C.G.). Respondents Defendants Versus 1. Ghasnin Bal D/o. Late Bisahu Sahu, R/o. ViHage Bhakhara, Tatisi! Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.). 2. Mehatarni Bal D/o. iate Bisahu Sahu, R/o. Viliage Bhakhara; TahslS Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.). (Writ Petltion under Articie 227 of the Constltution of Sndia) iVir.R.S.Patel, counsel forthe petitioner. None present for the respondents. (SB: Hon'bEe Mr T.P. Sharr8ia,J.) ORDER (1-11-2011) 1. By this writ petition under Articte 227 of the Conststution of !ndia the petitioner has chajienged the legality and propriety of the order dated 4.11.2009 passed by the Board of Revenue, BSsaspur, Cjrcult Court, Raipur, in Revenue Revision Case No.R.N./4/'R/A-6/2006-07, afflrming the order dated 31.10.2006 passed by the Coljector, Dhamtarl, in Revenue Appeai Case No.55/A-6/2005-06, whereby the Coiiector has directed the petltioner to produce the evidence and original wili. ^l have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, perused the order impugned and other documents fiied on behaifofthe petitioner. 3. By passing such order by the Coiiector, Dhamtari and affirming such order by the Board of Revenue, both the revenue authorit'ses havs not committed any lllegailty warranting interference In exercise of supervlsor/ jurisdiction. 4. Consequentiy, the wrlt petitlon is ilable to be dismissed and it is hereby dlsmisssd at the motlon stage itseif. No order as to costs. 5. Interim appiication stands disposed of. [ i T.p.Sharma •i Judge