IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 28TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 9TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 6227 of 2011(C) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ DELPHINA DAVID, WIFE OF BIJU FRANCIS, AGED 35 YEARS, JUNIOR HINDI TEACHER, P.S.HIGH SCHOOL, THIRUMUDIKUNNU, KORATTY EAST-680308, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680003. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680121. 5. THE MANAGER, P.S.HIGH SCHOOL, THIRUMUDIKUNNU, KORATTY EAST-680308, THRISSUR DISTRICT. R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.6227 Of 2011-C ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 28th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner was appointed as Junior Hindi Teacher in the 5th respondent school from 1.6.2009 against a retirement vacancy, as per Exhibit P1. The approval was declined stating the objection that the appointment of one Fr.George Payyappilly as Manager has been rejected and hence the appointment made by him is not valid. This was taken up in appeal before the Deputy Director of Education, but that was rejected by Exhibit P4, against which the petitioner has filed a revision as per Exhibit P5 before the Director of Public Instructions. The petitioner prays that the revision petition may be directed to be disposed of within a time frame. 2. There will be a direction to the 2nd respondent- Director of Public Instructions to take a decision on Exhibit P5 revision petition on its merits, within a period of two W.P.(C)No. 6227/11 -2- months, after hearing the petitioner and the Manager. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the Writ Petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn True copy P.A.to Judge