IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3386 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: March 10, 2011 Arun Kumar .. Petitioner Vs. Ram Murti and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. A.K. Kansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjeev Verma, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Mr. Amit Kumar Jain, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5. A.N. Jindal, J This petition assails the order dated 29.1.2010 (Annexure P8) passed by the learned Additional District Judge (II), Jind whereby the appeal filed by the respondent- defendants was accepted and the order dated 1.10.2009 passed by the trial court striking off the defence of the respondent- defendants and the order declining the request for review was set aside. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that since in the connected petition the respondents were directed to serve interrogatories and further directions to face consequences for not serving interrogatories were issued, therefore, he would not assail the order. However, in case of failure to answer the interrogatories as per provisions of Order XI Rule 21 CPC, he could apply for striking off the defence. Resultantly, in view of the aforesaid averments made at the bar, this petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner that in case the respondents' refuse to serve interrogatories, the petitioner would move for striking off the defence by filing an application and in that situation, the court would proceed in accordance with law. March 10, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge