IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.691 of 2011 BHUPENDRA CHOUDHARY, SON OF LATE MISHRI CHOUDHARY R/O VILLAGE AND P.O. AKHTIARPUR, P.S. SARAIRANJAN, DISTT. SAMASTIPUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRI GIRISH SHANKAR, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. SMT. ANITA RAM, ADHYAKSH, SAMASTIPUR MUNICIPALITY, SAMASTIPUR. 4. SRI JAMAL ASGAR KHAN, VICE CHAIRMAN, SAMASTIPUR MUNICIPALITY, SAMASTIPUR. 5. SRI SHAKET BIHARI SHARMA, THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SAMASTIPUR MUNICIPALITY, SAMASTIPUR. 6. RAM BINOD SINGH SON OF SRI RAJ KUMAR SINGH, R/O VILLAGE SULTANPUR P.O. AND P.S. MOHIUDDIN NAGAR, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR A/P WORKING AS CLERK, SAMASTIPUR MUNICIPALITY, SAMASTIPUR. 7. ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA SON OF BHOLA PRASAD GUPTA, R/O MOHALLA GUDARI BAZAR, WARD NO.6, P.O. AND P.S. SAMASTIPUR, A/P WORKING AS CLERK, SAMASTIPUR MUNICIPALITY, SAMASTIPUR. ------------------- 04. 17.08.2011 In compliance of the order of the High Court dated 26.04.2010, Annexure-1 the case of the petitioner for promotion was considered by the Commissioners of Samastipur Municipality in their meeting held on 29.12.2010 and request of the petitioner for promotion was rejected. Rejection order has been communicated to the petitioner under Memo No.10 dated 10.01.2011 without annexing the resolution of the Board of Commissioners. The contempt petition is, accordingly, disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to 2 challenge the communication made to him under Memo No.10 dated 10.01.2011. It goes without saying that as the proceedings of the Board of Commissioners dated 29.12.2010 has not been annexed with Memo No.10 dated 10.01.2011, there is no difficulty in concluding that the said decision is without indicating any reason. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)