IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1467 OF 2005 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1094 OF 2005 Jayesh Jayantilal & Co. ... PLAINTIFF V/s. Khushal Hansraj Gala ... DEFENDANTS None for the plaintiff. Ms. Jaymala Raut for defendant Nos. 1 & 2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 24th March, 2006 : 24th March, 2006 : 24th March, 2006 P.C. . None for the plaintiff. In view of statement as recorded in order dated 13th May, 2005 in reference to prayer (f) of the Notice of Motion and the same was further continued by order dated 14th December, 2005 and lastly by order dated 30th January, 2006 in Chamber Summons No. 97 of 2006, I see there is no reason now to modify or grant any further relief in favour of the applicant in support of this Notice of Motion. It has been specifically stated in order dated 13th January, 2006 that statement made by respondent No. 1 & 2 as recorded in order dated 13th May, 2005 is continued pending hearing and final disposal of the Chamber summons. ( 2 ) 2. By an order dated 22nd November, 2005 after considering the defence raised by the defendant, the Summons for Judgment has been made absolute and the Summary Suit is decreed as prayed. In view of this, to meet ends of justice and to suffice the purpose the said statement is continued till the decision of the suit. 3. The Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly with liberty. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]