^f-1 3^2; <•V IN THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) N0. i(J^- /2010 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS ..^s^ -^y ^ 1. Smt Sushma Bara , W/o Shri Manohar Minj, aged about 40 years, workmg as Head Master, T.W.D. Primary School, Dhaindamba, Block - Duldula, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, ^ D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^"^••A .^ ^' 2. ."-:^. ^v'~.^':rt'^" ^;'^" ^^"~ ^'%, \^elfl ^.-f^ Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, Distt- Jashpur (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Block - Duldula Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) ^ Treasury Officer; Treasury Account & Pension Jashpur, Distt.-Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA •a^ff^T^W TI^T ^TT^T s^Ni' 's^ ^ww^, '^^\w\vo, [®i<ni-(-i*j,< —.^J.:.?...(£l.r^.:.9M.2/lv5.. 'WiW^?W"""""""n~"""""""""""7'"""";CT^200 ^7^?T7ET?^ ( yt^^T) y^ryw^f^sn^y SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Moha Astte 06-08-2010 Shri Somkant Verma, couns? Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel L advance copy. Heard. Learned counsel appearing petitioner is entitled to benefit of tv^ she having passed B.T. I. examinati^ cost. It is submitted that the issue ionger res integra and the same h^ Supreme Court in the case of 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59. It is furtlt taken a similar view in his ol W.P.(S)No.6257of2008. Learned attention of this Court to order dat^ No. 124 of 2009, wherein relying up<j in the case of Asha Saxena (supra)| another Writ Appeal No.87/2009| consideration of the case for gran) circular dated 21-09-1974 issued b1 verification ofthe facts pleaded in Learned counsel for the re| petitioner would also be considered | "L- ^, ^^ ^ric? -FS/147—2/2010—1,00,000. <a|»Hf<!1<fl<1 TTP:Rff ^f 'feT^ iFst^K ^^tRmsn^T 1 Shrivastava. J. for the petitioner. awyer for the State/respondents on tlle for the petitioner submits that the |o advance increments on account of ^n before her appointment at her own linvotved in the present petition is no ^ been finally decided by the Hon'ble Saxena vs. State ofMP. & Ors., er submitted that this Court has also •der dated 06-02-2009 passed in ;ounsel for the petitioner further draws >d 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal m the judgment of the Supreme Court and the order passed by this Court in directions have been issued for of two advance increments as per / the State of Madhya Pradesh, after e petition. spondents submits that case of the sn the same lines. ^i A :'^^^^^-. ^•^^ l^.te^ XI-HC—78 'S^ ^ww^, ^•al'M^Ko, fs«yii'y^< , __^:i'..^lKU:..4t%fJ.<>.. <4l*lCTl «»*<!<»»"•—•""• 7—^^ 200 ^TI^T 7^R7 (1?^^) a^T'^1 ^i<=h ^T^T 3?IT^T'gWap -< Tumane '(R^TTW ^fef 3;TT^¥1 i—^- In view of the statement m| disposed of with a direction to the re^ decide the claim of the petitioner for per circular dated 21-09-1974 issue^ after verification ofthe facts pleaded i| weeks from today. ^il^id^H 'RFI^f ^ fe^t <M<^S< ^73TRm3?T^T ade above, this petition is finally pondent authorities to consider and grant of two advance increments as .by the State of Madhya Pradesh, i the petition within a period of eight Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge