IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CR.WP/143/2011 SAU.ARCHANA KAILASRAO KHARJULE V/S THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS ... Shri S.J.Salunke, Advocate for petitioner and Shri N.H.Borade, APP for respondents ... CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & A.V.POTDAR, JJ. Dated : February 18, 2011 PER COURT : 1. At the outset, Shri Salunke, learned Counsel for the petitioner states, on instructions that the petitioner does not press the relief as prayed for in prayer clause (c) to the petition but prays for liberty to file a separate and comprehensive petition for the said relief. We see no ground for refusing the liberty as prayed for. 2. On instructions, learned APP states that the husband of the petitioner came to be arrested on 17.2.2011 at 2245 Hrs. in Crime No.64 of 2010, registered under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code and pursuant to his arrest, he would be produced before the learned Judicial Magistrate (First Class) at 3.00 pm today. 3. In the light of the fact that the husband of the petitioner has been arrested in a crime and presently is not in illegal detention, we do not find any merit in the petition and the petition is liable to be dismissed. 4. The petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty as prayed for. (A.V.POTDAR,J.) (P.V.HARDAS, J.) ... akl