IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11574 of 2010 ASHTHAM RAI, SON OF SINGHASAN RAI, OF VILLAGE- BARA BARIYARPUR, P.S. CHHATAUNI, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN……………………….PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………OPPOSITE PARTY. -------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sangeet Deokuliar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. ----------- 2. 30.4.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 379, 461 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is not named in the First Information Report, however, on the basis of the confessional statement of co-accused Dasarath Sahani recorded by the police, the petitioner has been implicated in this case. It has also been submitted that the aforesaid co-accused, Dasarath Sahani, had already been granted bail by the court below itself. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 24.3.2008 and is having clean antecedent. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of - 2 - the case, the petitioner, Ashtham Rai, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Chhataurni P.S. Case No.19 of 2008, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, after his release in this case, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)