FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5669 OF 2010 ( P. Tirupati s/o. Ramchandrayya Vs. Madhavrao s/o. Ganpatrao Deshpande & Anr. ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. V.D. Patnoorkar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. P.G. Godhamgaonkar, Advocate for respondent No. 2. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 7th March, 2011. PER COURT : 1. The dispute between parties pertains to mutation. Admittedly civil suit filed in 2003 is still pending. Shri. Patnoorkar is seeking time to find out exact position. Shri. Godhamgaonkar points out that in that civil suit Exh. 5 moved by petitioner initially was granted and appeal filed by respondent bearing MCA 43/2004 was allowed. He states that adjudication in civil suit will binding on revenue authorities and hence, the grievance in petition is rendered infructuous. 2. It is apparent that the question is receiving consideration by competent Civil Court. The revenue entries are only for fiscal purpose and hence are not binding in those proceedings. In view of this position, I find that challenge is rendered infructuous because of civil litigation. Petition is therefore accordingly disposed of. No costs. [ B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. ] ssc/wp5669.10