2crn5674-09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5674 OF 2009 Shri Virendra Laxmidas Thakkar. .. Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.Virendra Pethe, Advocate i/b. B.D. Joshi, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs.A.S. Pai, A.P.P. for the State. .... CORAM : A.R.JOSHI, J. DATED : 6TH JULY, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard learned Advocate Mr.Pethe for the applicant for sometime on this application for relaxation of the condition imposed by the Sessions Court. 2. During the arguments, learned Advocate for the applicant submits that earlier anticipatory bail application was granted by this Court. Thereafter, regular bail was granted by the Sessions Court and condition was imposed on the applicant not to leave India without permission of the said Court. Thereafter for 4-5 occasions, the applicant went 2crn5674-09 2 out of India with the permission of the concerned Court. Thereafter one condition was imposed on the applicant to deposit his passport. Reportedly, the applicant wanted the said condition to be relaxed. Apparently, the applicant is facing offences punishable under Sections 3 & 4 of MPID Act and also punishable under Section 420 r/w Section 34 of IPC. 3. Considering the prayers and considering the ground that being a businessman applicant wants to travel out of India frequently, there is nothing to entertain such application as the said ground do not weigh with this Court. As and when the applicant wants to leave India, there is always a way open to him to seek permission of the concerned Court which is seized of the matter and which is to deal with the matter according to law and see that smooth progress of the trial shall continue. With these directions, present Criminal Application No.5674 of 2009 stands rejected. (A.R.JOSHI,J.)