IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 6TH PHALGUNA 1930 Crl.MC.No. 780 of 2009() ------------------------ (AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ERNALULAM IN C.C.NO. 384/2008 DATED 8.2.2009 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT-III, MEERUT) PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED IN C.C ---------------------- 1. K.H. LATHEEF, S/O. ASSAINAR, AGED 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT KALLATTIL HOUSE, PANAYAPPILLY, KOCHI - 682 004, ERNAKULAM. 2. P.U. JISHAM, S/O. UMMER, AGED 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT NAJEEB HOUSE, PANAYAPPILLY , KOCHI - 682 004, ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS. SRI.K.M.JAMALUDHEEN SMT.LATHA PRABHAKARAN SMT.SARASWATHI PALEREKEEZHIL RESPONDENT(S)/CLAIM PETITIONER & STATE: --------------- 1. RAVI RASTOGI, S/O. LATE RASTOGI, AGED 44 YEARS, C/O. RELIANCE HANDLOOM INDUSTRIES, KRISHNA COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, OLD TEHSIL, NEAR CITY KOTWALI, MEERUT, UTTAR PRADESH. 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. GIKKU JACOB THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN, J ----------------------- CRL.M.C.No. 780 OF 2009 --------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of February, 2009 O R D E R The prayer is to direct the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ernakulam to postpone the further proceedings pursuant to Annexure C order for a period of 60 days from 24.02.2009. The petitioners were released on the basis of an order dated 8.2.2009. One of the conditions was to report before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court -III , Meerut on 16.02.2009 and produce certificate of appearance from Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court-III, Meerut before the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ernakulam on 26.2.2009. Now what the petitioners want is to extend that date of appearance before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court -III, Meerut on the ground of some injuries or ailment as stated in the petition. If any modification of the order or relaxation or extension is required, the petitioners are at liberty to move the court which passed the order namely the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ernakulam and it is for that court to consider the said prayer. With that liberty the petition is dismissed. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE vkm