vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION WRIT PETITION WRIT PETITION NO.5490 OF 2005 NO.5490 OF 2005 NO.5490 OF 2005 Kolhapur Municipal Corporation ... Petitioner V/s. Mahanagar Palika Karmachari Sangh ... Respondent Mr.A.A. Kumbhakoni for Petitioner None for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: OCTOBER 20, 2005 OCTOBER 20, 2005 OCTOBER 20, 2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The Petition has been filed against an interim order passed by the Industrial Court. A complaint was filed under Items 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act contending that the letter issued by the Petitioner on 5.2.2005 amounts to an unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of the Act. This letter stipulates besides other things that a delinquent employee can be represented only by another employee in any enquiry held against him. Prima facie, it has been held by the Industrial Court that this letter amounts to an unfair labour practice. In my view, there is no error in the interim order of the Industrial Court since admittedly the Respondent is a recognised union under the MRTU & PULP Act. 2. I see no reason to interfere with the order impugned. Petition is accordingly rejected.