Civil Revision No.314 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.314 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 18, 2011 Maninder Singh Amol .....Petitioner v. Sqn.Ldr.Gurdial Singh and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Pankaj Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing of impugned order dated 30.10.2010, passed by learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Chandigarh, Annexure P4, vide which the application moved by petitioner for setting aside the ex parte judgment and decree dated 16.7.1998 has been allowed subject to furnishing the bank guarantee of Rs.5.00 lacs. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully including the impugned order passed by learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Chandigarh. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner- defendant that the impugned order has been passed on the statement of counsel for the respondent-plaintiffs and however, petitioner-defendant never agreed for the condition imposed by learned trial Court for setting aside ex parte judgment and decree against him. It is further contended that rather the trial Court should have decided the said application on merit. There is force in the argument of learned counsel for the petitioner. Hence, impugned order passed by learned trial Court is set aside and learned trial Court is directed to decide the application filed by petitioner-defendant for setting aside ex parte judgment and decree passed Civil Revision No.314 of 2011 (O&M) -2- against him on merit, as per law. Disposed of accordingly. 18.1.2011 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge