INTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATJiILASPUR WRITPETITIONNO. ';f'o)/J OF 2005 PETITIONER: ^ ^w/ //\^/ s//^y C-'CN,- Girigesh Kumar Tiwari S/_Q- Shri cf, •Sl^^ ^•ejs' Tiwari, Aged About- 44Years, Occupation-Service (.^s^fti <?(a.<.»-;g^, R/o- Village and 'Post Janakpur Thesil-Bharatpur, Distt.- Koria (C.G.) ^" ^•^•-ry ^''l'^'s' <^: •'f' y VERSUS RESPONDENT (S): State of Chhattisgarh Through it's Secretary Department of Forest D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) l<Conservator of Forest Forest Circle- Surguja, Ambika.pur (C.G.) , • DivisiQnal Forest Officer Forest Divisibn- Koria (C.G.) 4^Collector Koria Distt. Koria(C.G.) WRIT PETITION ^,'.^.:.- UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE.OI^ ANiiABRRQgRLCTE WRIT IN THE.NATURE OF MANDAMUS, / CERTIQRARI ETG. OR DIRECTION / ORDERIN THELIKE NA'FURE. Uk Petitfoner Girigesh KumarTiwari Veraus Respondents StateofChhaBl^arti&ottiers SB: Hon'bte MF. Jusft»Safish K. Agnihotri, J Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocatefor tfie peiitioner. Shri^ay Dwivedf, Paflel Lawyer fw the reqMHKtents/State. ORDER (Passedonthts2^11day<rfF8t»nary,2007) The foltotring oreter of e Court is passsd by SatishK Ag^iotri, J. 1. The petWoner white woridng as A^idadt Grato -IU hi the Forest Range Janakpur, £3istrict- Koria vras transfetred tD Manmdragarti on thesame tsrms and condiflons vftte mpugnedtransfer wder datod 9.9.20<K (Anneaire P/1) wlthin ftesame district. 2. This Court vide interim order dated 5.10.2(X)5 directed ttiat tte impugned order in respect oftti®petffionerbe not tfwn ^fect to lill ttre neictdate of hearing. 3. Be that as it may.witti flie passage of time thte pe "on teR become inftuctuous as periwl oftransfer is fK^applKaye forever. Atttte polnt of time there fe no question to examine tte wli(Wy <rf the transfer order. However, ttie r^pondents are at fibertyto pass ap(xop(fate orders keeping ln vi^ 8ie publiG interestand adminisb'aUve ©dgency, without instsBng on Gompliance of the Impugned transfer ordCT. 4. It is weHsetHed principle oflaw ttiat tensfer is an hddent of servjee and it is for ttre emptayer to deckle as to where a partfeutar officer/employee be po^ed lceeping in wew public intere^ as weU as administraBve exigency. This Court has limited jurisdfction to Intefere in Bie transfer matter and thfe Court can interfere only inthe ease <rf proyed malafide, non-competence of authority passii^ the San^ar » order and transfer wder not being in conftwmBy vMh Vhe rutos and ragulaUons. 5. In view of the aboye, this petitfon stamfedBpwed of.lto order i® costs. __————" Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Thakur i Jiu^e I,:....li.Il