IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7523 of 2010 Date of decision: February 09, 2011 Phula .. Petitioner Vs. Amar Singh and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. R.A. Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Garg, Advocate for the respondents. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 30.8.2010 (Annexure P3) passed by the trial court allowing the application for amendment filed by the respondent No.1. Admittedly, the trial court allowed the respondent to be impleaded as party in whose favour the collusive decree was passed and those are Hawa Singh, Ram Chander and Dalel Singh. However, the respondent wants to add respondents No.4 to 11 and 15 as party to the suit. It has also been brought to my notice that no proposed amendment was attached with the application. Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the respondent states that he wants to file fresh application with better particulars and by appending the proposed amendment with the petition. Under the circumstances, the instant petition is allowed, impugned order is set aside and the respondent is permitted to withdraw the present application with a permission to file the application a fresh along with proposed amendment and the better particulars. February 09, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge