i I ‘HIE HI XJRT OF }HDICATURE AT BIiASPURfCHHA-FHSGARH E i § wT5’4€4;4 RI_1EfrnaN--No.2200 TI rem gr M'ishra a $ri Ramesh i’umar “ 'Msghra Age abaut~ 4C! yeam Rio Wag Tamnar, Post Tamnar, TahSd Gharhod D { ) istt Raigam C (.1 yERs‘xts 1} The Eta roug : Schopi Secreiary State of (2. ag. Bhawan‘ ‘fRaipur, Distt- Raipur (1 he Pariyajna Sénchalak Coiiecmr Raigar Raleev Gandhi E’naw Eduiation MiSSion Raagam E J The Pnnrmal [net Dharamlagarh \ 4T The L E D Jangad Parichaa Raigarh‘ E :3 § 5) Ramakant Pate! t Mariam Tache / Present posmd at pnmar Sche 3hmkabaha} Eiafi: Tamnar DEtt Raiga GN UNDER ART’CLE 226 St 227 GF THLE {UNSlIiUHGN D INEEA FER fSQUANLE DF A§PRQPRIATE WERE: DIRECTIGNS l‘ L NDfGR ORDERS Singh gauch x ‘ 1 IN T GH CQ } IGN R P saa ' Sk f: ‘ d e r ga ‘3‘ :/ te afCh‘ghatlisgarh k Thh , 6. m G T , h, m ; ’ f yt, er y m- rh 2} "‘ ‘M I CT‘ CHHATTISGARH AT‘B!LASP z ; § § Si:NGLE BENCH HONWLE MR 3ATISH K AGNiHOTRi R PTiTlON N0.4842 OF 2004 —"_————————-——_. ————._. \ . rem saar Mishra t k K , i " X Peiltlorrer i Resnondents e State of Chhattlsgarh a te _ Mr S C Verma counsel for the petmone respondents No 1 to 3 % Mr Ajay Dwwed: Panel Lawyer for the ate/ , None appears for respondents No and 5 k oRDER , i ‘ (Passed on 23’“ Day of February; 2007) i The petitioner who Is onumally an Assistant Teacr §r’ wlle working as Block Source Centre Coordinator m Rareev Gandh Srksha Mission at Biock Tamnar has been transferred to Pnmar Sl 3) he n,% h i h y choo Rengalbehan Block Tamnar, vrde order dated 7-1 2-2004 (P- 2. l l is Court Vlde Intrim rde dat ‘d 17-1~2 dirce that te petitioner shall not be ev his presen iece o post,if he is not alreadrelleved, till text eect earng 3. e that as it may, with the passag o time, this etitin has bcme infructuous as period of transfer-is no applicae forev At this point of time, there isrno question to ex'aniiine the validity of the E HIGH OUROF UR J WIT E P g V3I'SUS Th nd ohrs r St 4 . Th e or 005, etd h? relied from t p f ing: y hne dt ht. B e f po ep t bl er. ‘5 2 d f d y :mpugne transer orer However the respondenis are at lsbert to passr appropriate orders keepmg In vrew the pubhc mherest an admlmftratwe exrgency, Without Insrsting on comhance of the rmuned tnsfer ord . f 1 I ' r i , t is wen settled rincple of law that trahsfer i an inciden I 1 . , 4 f r i i E _ of siervice and it is for the emploer to decided as to where a particula oftieier/eImoloyee b posted keepin in viewpublic interest s well a e g a s ado Imstrative exrgency This Court has limited jurisdiction to Interfer in t e t’ransfer matter and this Court can Interfere only m the case of provedlmaa tide non-oompetence of authority passing the transfer ordr aind transfer order not bein in conformity With the rules and reguilation gs t i l i r Sd— / atish K. Agnotr 5.. No ri View of the above, the writ petition ‘ stands, disposed of. e toosts. i dd r as c (9 d p pig ra er . f pi s t g r 7 y r e f T g l f S ihi /