IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6747 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 04.11.2011 *** Radhey Shyam .. Petitioner VS. Badri Parsad & Ors. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. B.K. Bagri, Advocate for the petitioner. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The petitioner-tenant is aggrieved with order dated 19.9.2011 passed by the learned Rent Controller by virtue of which the application for amendment, filed by one of the landlords, has been allowed. Heard. It is apparent that by virtue of the proposed amendment, the landlord has sought to place of record the site plan to show the southern, western portion room and bathroom of the disputed property, which could not be shown with the site plan earlier attached with the petition. The amendment, which has been allowed, appears to be helpful in proper and just decision of the case. No doubt the earlier application for amendment filed by the landlords was withdrawn, but it was not decided on merits and thus, ipso facto does not debarred them to file the application again. Not only this, having common interest in the petition, the application filed by one of the landlords, is very much maintainable. No fault of ambiguity could be found with the approach adopted by the Court below. The instant petition, being without any merit, is accordingly dismissed. (ARVIND KUMAR) November 04,2011 JUDGE Jiten