LL>^^oS ^ BEE'OBS •IHE H.P. S'ffi.'EE &BHIt.a:S'a&'ElVg IKIBaH&a &r J&B&IiPtJS ^^ 79 4. Jhaaa Ram Kaacfaan 0.&.: HO. &ppli<»Bt s. JaflB . ^. a»a ®f-SS»3sa6i&an Kancfaaa aged abeut 35 y^.rs? s, r/®-sillage K&OHDKER& P.0. S^lna 1^1. Keskal Blstt- Baster M.P. v e r s a s ResDondents s- l. 3he St&te ©£ HaahYa pradeA 1iis©ughtfae Secretar^ 1-g.gher E<3acati.©RBeparttnent, Gavt. ®£ M.P. 'itellabh Efeavan; aaapal. £ "Bie CeBaaisslener l-B.gher Eaucatiea Bepartaeat c^vt. ®fH»E. Satpara Ebavan, A®pal. 3. 'lbeGBBiRu.sslaner Pablic Educati®n,Departmeh't, Qpvt. sty <?£ M.S. Geafeam Etagar, Haopal'. 4. Ihe CteHial.sd.sB&r TEibal tfelfare Beparteisnt @®vt.®£M,P. Satpada Bhavan, %epaX:.: Applic&ttea a/s 13 e£ ttie &<aEfd.BistBaAve. 'ECibuna.ls Act - 1985. • , tffiBfwr' HIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPLICANT WRIT PETmON <&) No. 893 of2005 : Jhadu Ram Kanchan. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : The State ofMadhya Pradesh & Ofliers. APPLICATION U/ST9 QF THE ADMINISTRATTVE TfoBUNALS ACT. 1985 SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AamflwtrL J. Present: Nonetbrthepetitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer forthe State. ORDER fORAL) (Passedon 07U1 day of September,2009) The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalfofthe petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing flie inatter. In view oftiie above, the matter is dismis^d for want ofprosecution. Anrit