1 abs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMONS NO. 193 OF 2009 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3137 OF 2007 M/s HTP Systems Pvt. Ltd. .. Plaintiff V/s M/s Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. .. Defendant Mr. G.M. Jain for the plaintiff-applicant. Mr. M.P.S. Rao i/b Doijode Associates for the defendant. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 14TH JULY 2009 P.C. : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the plaintiff and the defendant. 2. Two amendments are sought by this chamber summons. First amendment is regarding change of name of the defendant, for which the defendant has no objection. As regards the second amendment, learned counsel for the defendant submitted that the amendment should not be allowed. In my view, the second amendment does not change the nature of the suit, but it is only to replace Exhibit-D which is a challan. 2 3. Hence, the chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer (a). Amendment shall be carried out within 2 weeks. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)