IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.7567 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.12.2009 Rajwant Singh … Petitioner Versus Rimi …Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.Vipul Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Sabina, J. The petitioner has filed this petition challenging order dated 14.11.2009 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Amritsar, whereby he was ordered to pay Rs.2000/- per month as maintenance pendente lite to the respondent-Rimi and Rs.3000/- as litigation expenses. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the instant petition is devoid of any merit and deserves dismissal. A perusal of the impugned order reveals that during the course of arguments on the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act (‘Act’- in sort), parties had arrived at a compromise regarding quantum of maintenance allowance. In view of the statements suffered by the parties, application under Section 24 of the Act was allowed. Rs.2000/- were granted as maintenance pendente lite per month to the respondent-Rimi from the date of the application and Rs.3000/- were granted towards litigation expenses. Since the impugned order was passed on the basis of a compromise effected between the parties, no ground for interference by this Court is made out. Dismissed. [ Sabina ] Judge 18.12.2009 sd