1 17WP.5222-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5222 OF 2011 Dr.Ramdas Abasaheb Deshmukh and another. ..Petitioners. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Y.S. Jahagirdar, Sr.Counsel i/b. A.A. Joshi, for the Petitioners. Mr.Surel S. Shah, for Respondent No.3. Mrs.M.P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. .... CORAM : D. D. SINHA & A. R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 12th JULY, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioners, learned Counsel for Respondent No.3 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 – State. 2. Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioners has brought to our notice the representation / application dated 10.5.2011 addressed to the Managing Director of Respondent No.3 – Karkhana. The grievance of the petitioners is that Respondent No.3 – Karkhana has failed to prepare two voters list – one for producer­members and another for non­producer members and those members who have stopped production and supply of PPD 2 17WP.5222-11 sugarcane to Respondent No.3 – Karkhana, their names may be redeemed finally. It is submitted that Respondent No.3 has not decided this application / representation submitted by the petitioners and, therefore, prayed that appropriate direction be given to Respondent No.3. 3. Learned Counsel for Respondent No.3 has submitted that the representation dated 10.5.2011 submitted by the petitioners shall be decided finally on its own merits in accordance with law on or before three weeks. In view of the statement made by learned Counsel for Respondent No.3, the cause of action involved does not survive, therefore, the Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (D. D. SINHA, J.) (A. R. JOSHI, J.)