CT THE HIGH CGBRT OF CHBaTTISSARH AT BIL^»m VaSS PETXTION HO. <Z<5 2- OF 2006 BETITIOKER 1 'Tlt? ...•• €?^ ^^'SF"" L^^"' ^ '7.-'''' *••*' ..<•• ,ca*' VERSBS Vikasb Kumar Singh, Soa of late Shri S.P Singh, aged about 29 years, working as a Iiecburer, Sctaaol of Study ia Compafcer Seience and Infcrmation Tectaao- logy, Pandlt Ravi S^ainkar Shukla UnJLversity, Raipur. resident of Qtr. Ho.8-6,c*G« ^ Sfcreet 1, Sec. 7, Bhilai Hagar. Burg ( c Q ). EHT^ ^8"s^ ii\ 1. randit Ravi Sbankar Shukla University, Raipur through the S.ags.stsax, Raipur ( C.G. ) WRZT BETITIGH BNBER AKTICtES 226/227 OF SHE COBSTITUTIOK GF'IHDIA PQR ISSQANCE OF WRrC, DIRECTIpN_IH_TIfiNA5roBE__OF tUNBAHQS .......... ETC. '/ ~unt«a»)tEescatfiStii«¥aSii*aW.', R' HI6H COURT OF JUDIC4TURECHyATTIS6.A8H^BIL4SP<a Single Bench: Hon'bl®Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. '. P. No. 252 of 2006 Petitioner Versus Vikosh Kumar Singh Pandit Ravi Shankar Shukla Universit/, Raipur 5hri V.K. Pandey.coynsel for the petitioner. Shri 5umit Verma, counsel for the respondent. O R D ER iblu !. Learned counse! appearing for the respondent subinits that the A oppointment of the petitioner as Lecturer is on controct basis and requires certain formalities to be done. The appointment order could not be passed for u»antof requisite formalities on the part of tiie petitioner. Accord'mg to leamed counse! for the resppndent, there is no other ground for not Essuing the order of appointment. Learned counset for the petitioner undertakes that the petitioner may make himself avaiSable for al! the formah'ties, which are required to be done on 14.10.2006 in the office of the Registrar of the respondent-University. Thereafter, the respondent- Universit/ is directed to pass the appropriate order for appointment of the petitioner. 2. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sdf- 5.K. Agnihotn Judge