1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.344 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5 OF 2008 AND LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.345 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.463 OF 2007 AND LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.346 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.464 OF 2007 Rakesh S/o Rajendrakumar Agarwal .. Appellant. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.P.K. Dhakephalkar i/by Mr.S.P. Bunghate for the appellant. Mr.K.S. Dewal for respondents No.5 to 11. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & J.P. DEVADHAR, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J. DATED : 21st January, 2008 DATED : 21st January, 2008 DATED : 21st January, 2008 P.C. : 1. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. The challenge in all these appeals is to the order dated 24-10-2007 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition summarily and declining to interfere with the permission granted by the S.D.O. It is not disputed that pursuant to the orders impugned in the 2 petition, sale deed has been executed and the same has been registered and mutation entries have been recorded in the revenue records. We find no reason to interfere in the impugned order, particularly when the appellant before us has already filed suit in his own capacity in relation to the property in question. 2. Thus, we dispose of these appeals summarily, however, we observe that the observations made in the order is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties in the proceedings. 3. All the appeals stand disposed of with no order as to costs. 4. In view of disposal of appeals, nothing further survives in the Civil Applications. All the civil applications are dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE J.P. DEVADHAR, J.