IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1012 of 2007 Birendra Mahtaha @ Nand Kishore Versus Prabhu Dayal & Ors ----------- 14 17.11.2011 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. It appears from the order dated 28th July, 2011 also that no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on that date but the adjournment however was made by way of last chance. Today also no one has turned up to press this revision application. The perusal of the impugned order shows that the learned Court below has rejected the prayer of the petitioner for dropping the proceeding for contempt. The learned Court below has considered the facts and circumstances in detail and has concluded that the proceeding for contempt is not barred by limitation and has further found that it is necessary to enquire into the different aspects of the case. There is no illegality and jurisdictional error in the impugned order. The revision application is accordingly dismissed. Saif/- (V. Nath, J.)