IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN TUESDAY, THE 27TH MAY 2008 / 6TH JYAISHTA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1705 of 2007() ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.19689/2006 Dated 31/01/2007 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER --------------------- MADAKKAL CHATTICKAL BEEYARUMMA, IQBAL MANZIL, PUNCHAKKADU, PAYYANNUR P.O., KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.SERGI JOSEPH THOMAS RESPONDENT.IST RESPONDENT: ------------- SUBAIR, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESENTLY WORKING AS SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), EZHIMALA NAVAL ACADEMY, PAYYANNUR, KANNUR DIST. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI P.A.SALIM THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN, J. ----------------------------- CONT.CASE(C).No.1705 OF 2007 ------------------------------ Dated this the 27th day of May, 2008 JUDGMENT The complaint made in this contempt case is that the direction contained in the writ petition No.19689/2006 is not complied with. The direction was to consider and dispose of Ext.P2 in accordance with law. Ext.P2 is an application under Section 28A of the Land Acquision Act submitted by the petitioner to the lst respondent. An affidavit is filed by the respondent pursuant to the notice issued. It is submitted that the direction contained in the judgment has been complied with and the award amount has already been paid to the petitioner on 4/3/2008, though there was some delay, which is not wilful. 2. In the above circumstances, since Ext.P2 has been disposed of though belatedly and since it is submitted that the delay is not wilful or deliberate and tendered an unconditional apology, this contempt petition is closed. P.R.RAMAN, Judge. kcv. -2- O.P..No.