^a SlNGlE BENCH &> 0;' C^)^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fS) N0. &0^\ /2010 PETCTIONER c^'' Laxman Prasad Banjare, S/o Late Shri Ramcharan Banjare, aged about 58 years, Principal 6ovt. '°}^"'S:^o' '^'9'1er' Secondary School, ^,^••^•^y^ Nawagarh, Block Nawagarh, Distt. '.•^•^..••','\?u'' Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) \: RESPONDENTS VERSUS ^ : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.&.) ^2. District Education officer, Distt.- Janjgir-Champa C.G.} 3. Block Education Officer, Block Nawagarh, Distt. Janjgir- Champa(C.G.) y WRITPETTTION UNDER ARTECLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA. ~3^ ^TFlIcTO, ®tll'M41(o,feTCiy J.'..Z-...L&.')....£\c:.&OTi_/^ 3IR?r'CR^'(' sn^ qn Rii'* | Tiqi SII^t ailiRT 1 T^nwHrea sii^'1 SB : HOS'ELE MR. JUSTICE PRI 33.10.21 Shri. Arul Siagh Raiput, coui ShriVivek Shanna, P.L. for jsel for the petitioner. ilhe State. Counsel for the petitioner s| 1 entifled to benefit of two advance j havuig passed B.Ed. examlnaticii own cost. It is subinitted that the' peution is no longer res integra decided by fhe Hon'ble Supreiu.e| Saxena Vs. State of M.P. SE Ors. stubinits that fhe petitioner is liiicreinents on accoun.t of he ^efoi^ his appoiatnient at his issue iavolved in ffae present ajld the same bas been finaily- C^3iut in the case of !t is further subiaitted th&tl simflar view in its order dated 6.' 6257/2008. Counsel for the petiti^ns order dated 29.4.2010 passed in| whereui relying upon the judgtiien|t case ofAsha Saiteaa (supra) aad in auofher Writ Appeal No. 87J issiied for consideratiou of fhe iacreruents as per circular dated f of Madhya Pradesh, after verificat)oa petition. Counsel for the State subinij would also be considered on fhe st <ftl*liCT<l1l TTFR?ff ^f fiT^t '<f^'^l^ ^sifinsn^i fhis Court tias also taken a ^.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. oner further subiiiits that the Writ Appeal N0. 124/2009, t of the Suprerae Court in fhe order passed by this Court 2009. directions have been for grant of two advaiice 11.9.1974 issued by the State of fhe facts pleaded iu the fltie c&se ts that case ofthe netitioners une Unes. ^ XI-HG—78 "TST '*INIMA|, ©tily'ifi,R<irl|^|^< ^-......y:.£..Cs).A^,....fe^l_to 3T^r'tPRT(1pf3«I^si) •Bi^IWf^fRT TT8TT 3iT^T sh*li<^ !BN?Rh-qreff ^'feA-rfSR^ ^siRnsn^r In view of above, the pejition is disposed of witb. a direction to the icspondent autiio^ petitioner for grant of two advaajc dated 21.9.1974 issued by the verification of the facts pleaded inj eightweeks froin today. It is inade clear fhat this opinion on merits of tlie case ^i woiild be at tiberty to decide fh|e same strictly in accordaace wifh law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge tities to decide the claiui of fhe •e iacreinents as per circular itate of Madhya Pradesh after the petitioa withia a period of jCourt has not expressed any ind fhe authority concemed |C^)at • • •