IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43643 of 2009 1. SUBODH SINGH 2. SUDHIR SINGH, BOTH ARE SONS OF LATE PRAMOD SINGH 3. AJIT SINGH, SON OF AMOL SINGH 4. AMOL SINGH SON OF LATE DEVILAL SINGH, ALL ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-SONHAULI, P.S.-CHITRAGUPTA NAGAR, KHAGARIA, DISTRICT- KHAGARIA. …..Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. WITH Cr.Misc. No.46548 of 2009 1. ASHUTOSH KUMAR, SON OF LATE HARISHCHANDRA PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA-CHITRAGUPTA NAGAR, WARD NO. 14, P.S. AND DISTRICT- KHAGARIA. 2. VIJAY YADAV, SON OF LATE LAKHAN YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- CHUKATI, P.S.-MANSI, DISTRICT-KHAGARIA. …..Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. ----------- 02/ 08.01.2010 Since both the above bail applications have arisen out of a complaint i.e. Complaint Case No. 87 (c) of 2009, is heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Case of the complainant, Rajeev Prasad is that Ramesh Chandra Sinha hatched a conspiracy to grab his land and for that permission was sought before A.D.M. for creation of Jamabandi in their names. After knowing about the same, objection was filed. Then, thereafter, they along with Sudhir Singh created forged power of attorney got a Jamabandi created in the name of Kunjo Singh 2 and thereafter got a sale deed executed in favour of accused no. 10 and 11 over which the accused no.1 stood as witness. Submission is that it is out and out a civil dispute and it is not an appropriate forum to this subject. A proceeding under Section 144 of the Cr.P.C. was initiated between the parties and the police reported to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Khagaria that the land in question are is in possession of Ist Parties namely of the accused persons. It has also been submitted that considering the facts and circumstances of the case, Ramesh Chandra Sinha was granted bail by this Court on 16.10.2009 vide Cr. Misc. No. 33350 of 2009. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that the petitioners were trying to take forcibly possession of the land which belongs to the complainant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioners are directed to be released from custody on bail on furnishing bail bonds of 3 Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria/Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class Khagaria/concerned court in connection with Complaint Case No. 87 (C) of 2009. kksinha/ ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)