IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 7TH MARCH 2011 / 16TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 6919 of 2011(L) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- RATHEESH, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O. HARIHARAN, CC XXI/689 (A), POZHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, PAI ROAD, PERUMPADAPPU, KOCHI-682 006. BY ADV. SRI.G.KRISHNAKUMAR SRI.P.H.SHAJI (THRIKKAKARA) SRI.TITTO THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. CHIEF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, GANDHI NAGAR, ERNAKULAM-682 020. 3. CORPORATION OF COCHIN, PARK AVENUE ROAD, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY. 4. ROBIN BEVERA, AGED 40 YEARS, CC XXI/689, THEKKANSSERY HOUSE, PERUMPADAPPU, KOCHI. R1 AND R2 BY ADV. SRI. M.K. CHANDRAMOHAN DAS ADV. SRI.K.ANAND, SC, COCHIN CORPN. FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.6919 OF 2011(L) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of March, 2011 J U D G M E N T The only relief sought in this writ petition is a direction to the 2nd respondent to cancel Ext.P2 consent issued in favour of the 4th respondent. 2. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the consent issued to the 4th respondent to operate the workshop, the remedy available to the petitioner is to file an appeal before th statutory authority. Now that such remedy is available there is no reason to entertain the writ petition. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/