IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR C.R.P.NO.5468 OF 2006 21-12-2010 Between:- Gullapalli Venkata Suryanarayana and others .. Petitioners And Nekkanti Peddayya (died) and others ..Respondents ORDER:- Learned Counsel for the petitioners questions the order passed by the trial Court amending the decree that was passed. It is the case of the petitioners that when appeals were filed by the parties and the same were pending before the superior Court, the trial Court cannot amend the decree. This point is indeed a question, which deserves to be considered in an appropriate case. In the present case, a decree was passed by the trial Court in a common judgment. The amendments of the decrees that were permitted by the trial Court under Section 152 C.P.C and the decrees of the trial Court stood merged with the decrees in the judgments in the appeals in A.S.No.955 of 1997, 1217 of 1997 and 134 of 1999 through the common judgment dated 06.06.2006. Once the appellate Court disposed of the Appeals, the decrees of the trial Court became non est and the decrees passed by the trial Court stood merged with the decrees of the appellate Court. Consequently, the question whether the trial Court has no jurisdiction to order amendment of the decrees when the appeals were pending before the appellate Court does not arise for consideration. Virtually, this Revision has become infructuous where the appeals from the judgments of the trial Court were disposed of. I, therefore, see no merits in this Revision. This Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, dismissed holding that the same has become infructuous. No costs. _______________ K.G.SHANKAR,J 21st December 2010 AMD