IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1659 OF 2005 Smt. Manjuben Ranchhodbhai Patel ... Applicant V/s M/s K. Patni Textiles & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Shailesh Naidu i/b M/s C.R. Naidu & Co. for applicant Mr. D.P. Adsule A.P.P. for the State. ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1676 OF 2005 Smt. Manjuben Ranchhodbhai Patel ... Applicant V/s Jawaharlal L. Agicha & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Shailesh Naidu i/b M/s C.R. Naidu & Co. for applicant Mr. P.V. Nichani & Co. for respondent No.1 Mr.Y.S. Shinde, A.P.P. for the State. ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1678 OF 2005 Smt. Manjuben Ranchhodbhai Patel ... Applicant V/s Mr. Arjan H. Keswani & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Shailesh Naidu i/b M/s C.R. Naidu & Co. for applicant Mr. H.H.Nagi for respondent No.1 Mr. V.B.Kondedeshmukh, A.P.P. for the State. ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1679 OF 2005 Smt. Manjuben Ranchhodbhai Patel ... Applicant V/s Mr.Sureshkumar Jaichandji & Ors. ... Respondents 2 Mr. Shailesh Naidu i/b M/s C.R. Naidu & Co. for applicant Mr. H.H.Nagi for respondent No.1 Mr. Y.S.Shinde,APP for the State. Coram : V.K.Tahilramani,J. Date : 14th June 2005. P.C. : 1 Heard the learned advocate for the applicant,respondent No.1 and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2 The applicant has prayed for quashing of process issued against her in criminal case no.306/S/2003 1156/S/2002,570/S/2002,472/S/2003, which are pending in the courts of learned Magistrate at Kurla, Mazgaon, Mulund and Esplanade respectively.In the said cases, process has been issued against the applicant mainly under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 3 For the reasons recorded in my order dated 8th June 2005 passed in criminal application No.645 of 2005 and order dated 13th June 2005 passed in criminal writ petition No.213 of 2005, the applicant has remedy of preferring revision against the order of Magistrate issuing process. Hence, in my view, it would be appropriate that the 3 applicant prefers revision before the concerned Sessions Court against the order of the Magistrate issuing process. 4 Liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer revision before the concerned Sessions Court. 5 On the necessary revision being preferred by the applicants before the concerned Sessions Court, the concerned Sessions Court shall dispose of the same on merits after hearing necessary parties. 6 Criminal applications are disposed of. ( V.K.Tahilramani,J.)