HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.23416 of 2010 Date: March 24, 2011 Between: 1. Gottimukkala Bangar Raju & 4 others. … Petitioners and 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & 3 others. … Respondents * * * HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.23416 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioners assail the action of the Revenue Authorities in trying to evict them from the land admeasuring Ac.5.00 cents in Survey No.137/P of Sanghivalasa village, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, without issuing them prior notice. They seek a consequential direction to the authorities not to interfere with their possession except in accordance with the procedure laid down by law. 2. The petitioners claim to have purchased the subject land under a registered sale deed. They allege that on 09.9.2010 the Revenue Authorities along with respondent 4, a private party, came to their lands and tried to interfere with their possession. Hence, this writ petition. 3. This Court, by order dated 21.9.2010, directed that the petitioners should not be dispossessed from the subject land. W.V.M.P. No.5246 of 2010 was filed by the fourth respondent to vacate the said order. However, as the matter is amenable for disposal at this stage, this final order is being passed. 4. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, relying on letter dated 24.10.2010 addressed by the Tahsildar, Bheemunipatnam, stated that no attempts were being made by the Revenue Authorities to evict the petitioners from the subject land without issuing notices as alleged by them. In that view of the matter, the petitioners’ apprehensions that the Revenue Authorities are seeking to dispossess them from the subject land without following the due procedure laid down by law stand disproved. 5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of recording the submission made on behalf of the Revenue Authorities that they would not interfere with the possession of the petitioners over the subject land except in accordance with the due procedure laid down by law. T h e inter se disputes between the petitioners and the fourth respondent cannot be made the subject matter of a public law remedy and they must necessarily resolve the same before a competent forum in accordance with law. This order shall not preclude the civil court or such other forum that the petitioners or the fourth respondent may approach, from dealing with the matter independently. In the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J Date: March 24, 2011. BSB