IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 5TH DECEMBER 2006 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 WP(C).No. 32318 of 2006(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ RASHMI MANOJ, AGED 25, W/O.MANOJ, MUNDODIKANDI, BALUSSERI POST, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHARAM.P RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. GENERAL CONVENER/SECRETARY, BLOCK PANCHAYATH "KERALOLSAVAM 2006", BALUSSERY BLOCK PANCHAYATH, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. GENERAL CONVENER/SECRETARY, DISTRICT PANCHAYATH "KERALOLSAVAM 2006", KOZHIKODE DISTRICT PANCHAYATH, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY G.P. SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/12/2006, THE COURT ON 05/12/2006 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P. (C) No. 32318 OF 2006 V ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 5th day of December, 2006 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is challenging Ext.P1 order whereunder the jury of appeal has rejected petitioner's appeal against award of second prize to her team. The specific case of the petitioner is that one of the members of the judging committee was interested in the team, which won the first prize. However, it is clear from Ext.P1 order that there were three members constituting the committee of judges and petitioner has no allegation against two of them. Moreover, no other team has approached this court challenging the award of first prize to another team, which is not made a respondent in the writ petition. In the circumstances, I do not think it fit to interfere with Ext.P1 order in appeal. Writ petition is dismissed. (C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) aks