IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5753 of 2001 (O&M) Date of decision:05.08.2009 Sumitra Devi and others ....Petitioners versus Siri Gaunshala Society (Regd.) G.T.Road, Panipat ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr.Arun Kumar Singal, Advocate, for the petitioners. None for the respondent. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. The revision is against the order striking off the defence on the ground that an adjournment was allowed the previous time directing the party to pay Rs.200/- costs and had still not been paid and the conduct of the defendant in not complying with the order left the Court with no option but was to strike off the defence. 2. The suit is for the reliefs of permanent injunction and for mandatory injunction. The case which was instituted in the year 2001 is unfortunately allowed to languish all these years for needlessly inconsequential reasons for non payment of costs and for non-filing of written statement. The order of the Labour Court is set aside on condition that the revision petition pays cost of Rs.5,000/- to the plaintiff Civil Revision No.5753 of 2001 - 2 - on or before 31st August, 2009, failing which the order passed by the Court below shall stand confirmed. The revision petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 05.08.2009 sanjeev