1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.996 OF 2010. SMT. MANGALA W/O LALENDRA MEHARKURE & ANOTHER VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri Shyam Dewani Advocate for the applicant. Shri S. S. Doifode, APP for State respondent. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 8th JULY, 2010. 1. Heard Learned Advocate Mr. Shyam Dewani for the applicant and learned APP Mr. S. S. Doifode for State. 2. This is an application under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code. 3. The Learned Sessions Judge has granted ad interim anticipatory bail and rejected the application. 4. This Court had continued the interim protection granted by the Sessions Court by order dated 24-6-2010. 5. Perused the case diary. It consists of various documents one amongst those is the order of appointment of Administrator under the Maharashtra Cooperative 2 Societies Act. 6. After enquiry, the Officer passing the said order found that the applicant no.1 had got herself transferred to her own account totaling to Rs.10,00,000/-. It is also seen that the present applicant no.2 who is accused no.9 also unauthorizedly got the loan of Rs.5,00,000/- and the loan account was shown closed without actual repayment. 7. Apart from other voluminous evidence against the applicants on the same ground, it is seen that there is a strong case against the present applicant and it will not be possible at this stage to believe that the applicants are not guilty of the offence on the same ground. 8. Other ground pressed in service is that the accused are arrested and released on bail. Such release has no relevance so far as grant of anticipatory bail is concerned, as release after arrest stands on totally different footing. 9. The application has no merit and is rejected. Judge //mule//