... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.322 OF 2007 FROM ORDER NO.322 OF 2007 FROM ORDER NO.322 OF 2007 .................................................................. Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. .................................................................. Shri A.M.Saraogi for the Appellant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : APRIL 19, 2007. : APRIL 19, 2007. : APRIL 19, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Appellant. Ad-interim relief is not granted to the Appellant by the impugned order. Considering the nature of ad-interim relief sought, the learned trial Judge was justified in declining the same. The ad-interim relief sought was of a drastic nature restraining the Defendant from fetching water from the bore-well. There is no error in the impugned order. Appeal is dismissed. 2. Hearing of the Notice of Motion is expedited. It is obvious that Notice of Motion will be decided without being influenced by the observations made in the impugned order. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE