IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-19912 of 2009 Date of decision : September 04, 2009 Harjinder Singh ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab ....Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG Punjab L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) Harjinder Singh has filed this petition for bail in case FIR No. 50 dated 4.4.2007 under sections 302, 323, 324, 341, 506, 148, 149 IPC, Police Station Sadar Rajpura, District Patiala. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. The petitioner and his co-accused were named in the FIR whereas there were also 3/4 more un-named co-accused. All of them attacked Inderjit Singh since deceased on 4.4.2007. The accused were armed with gandasas and one of them with sword. They caused as many as 23 injuries to deceased Inderjit Singh who succumbed to his injuries on 22.4.2007, after developing gangrene and other complications and inspite of operations and medical aid. The FIR was lodged on the statement of Inderjit Singh himself. Criminal Misc. No. M-19912 of 2009 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner's co-accused Harbans Singh and Jagtar Singh have been granted bail. However, the petitioner cannot claim parity with them because they were not named in the FIR. Learned counsel for the petitioner next contended that the petitioner was attributed gandasa blow on the shoulder of the deceased. However, learned State counsel pointed out that the said blow resulted in fracture of scapula and in all 23 injuries were suffered by the deceased. Keeping in view the aforesaid but without meaning to express any opinion on the merits, the petitioner does not deserve the concession of bail. Dismissed. ( L.N. Mittal ) September 04, 2009 Judge 'dalbir'