Single Bench /2?“ 3 BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR( CHHA'I'I‘ISGARH 1 WRIT PETITION S N0. 2011 /’ Varsha Vishwakarma aged 29 years W/o Late Ramkumar Vishwakarma R/o Village Chilhati, Ward No.7, Tehsil: Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G) MK W/ PETITIONER VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Women and Chi1d development department D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur RESPONDENTS 1. District Project Co-ordinator Women and Chi1d Welfare Department Tehsil Masturi, District : Bilaspur (C.G) Chief Executive officer, Janpad Panchayat , Masturi District Bilaspur (C.G) The collector Bilaspur Manju verma ‘ W/o Niranjan verma Aagan badi worker Village Clhati, Tehsil Masturi District Bilaspur (C.G) CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. hi HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Present: Shri DK. Vishwakarma, counsel for petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, PL forthe State. (\DHED (01.12.2011) s The grievance of the petitioner is that though the petitioner was place at SI. No.3 in the select list, but ignoring his candidature, the appointment order has been issued in favour of respondent No.5, who was at SI. No.7 in the merit iist. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that there exists an alternative remedy for the petitioner and therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition at this stage. He however submits that as the petitioner was pursuing this petition before this Court, the appeal to be filed before the Collector would be time barred and therefore, direction may be issued to respondent No.4 to decide the appeal on merits ignoring the point of limitation. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that let the petitioner make an appeal along with an application for condonation of delay and the said application and the appeal would be considered by the Collector in accordance with law. 4. Petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) W.P.S. No. 7000 of 2011 Petitianer Varsha Vishwakarma MERS.U_$ Responden‘ State of Chhattisgarh and others 5. Needless to state that in the eventuamy of tiling of any such appeai along with application for condonation of delay. the same would be decided in accordance with law keeping in view the fact that the petition remained pending before this Court for a considerable period. Sdl~ Pritinker Diwaker Judge Priya O/\