§jr §9~ )3 é M3 “x g$ APPELLANTS: 1. Kaxtikram, S/o Tirithram Verma, aged {Plaintiffs} about 44 years 2. Tirithram, S/o Bhaiyaram Verma, aged about 65 years, y Both R/o Village Champa, Tahsfl Baloda Bazaar, Distt‘ Raipur (C.G.) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Second Appeal {PR} No.3780 of 2008 Versus RESPONDENTS: 1. Rajendra Kumar, S/o Bharat Lal ’I‘iwari, aged about 47 years, R/O Champa, at present R/o Vidyut Colony, Simga, Distt. Raipur. 2. Sobhit Ram, S/o Bharat Lal Tiwari, aged about 43 years, R/o Champa, Tahsil Baloda Bazaar, Distt. Rajpur (C.G.) at present address Vidyut Colony, Simga, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Ramhin Bai, widow of Bharat Lal 'l‘iwari, s aged about 65 years, R/é Azad Chowk, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (C.G.) L 4. Rambai, W/o akhanlal Tiwari, aged about 7O years, R/o Champa, "Tahsil Baloda Bazaar, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 5. State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector, Rajpur, Distt. Raipur. {Second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908} Present: Mr. N.K. Chatterjee, counsel for the appellants. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondent No.5. Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Shama, J ORAL ORDER 8‘ 0 (30-3-2009) 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 5-8-2008 passed by the Ist Additional District Judge, Baloda Bazaar in unregistered Civil Appeal No. [2008, affirming the judgnent 65 decree dated 28-2-2008 passed by the Civil Judge Class—l, Baloda Bazaar in Civil Suit No.6-A/94. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants seeks to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file afresh. G 3. ’I‘he appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. ’ No order as to costs. Certified oopy of the order be returned to counsel for the appellants on Tv-\ filing duly attested Photostat copy of the same. l ‘ Sd/- l 1 l T. P. Sharma l 1 Judge Sonia