HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.22543 of 2009 ORDER: It appears the petitioner is working as a driver in the second respondent bus depot. He suffered severe ill-health and submitted an application on 28/07/2008 before the second respondent for sanction of leave. The respondent-authorities transferred the petitioner from second respondent depot to Zaheerabad depot vide order dated 21/07/2008 issued by the first respondent. As such, the petitioner filed W.P.No.18247 of 2008 and an interim order was made in W.P.M.P.No.23740 of 2008 directing the second respondent to take the petitioner on duty. The writ petition is still pending. While that is so, the petitioner submitted a leave application seeking to grant leave from 28/07/2008 to 01/10/2008, but the second respondent, for the reasons best known to him, has not sanctioned leave. However, in terms of the interim order granted in W.P.M.P.No.23740 in W.P.No.18247 of 2008 dated 26/09/2008, he had reported to duty and discharging his duties since then. Now the grievance of the petitioner is that neither the second respondent sanctioned leave from 28/07/2008 to 01/10/2008 nor paid the salary for the said period. Though he issued a legal notice on 27/02/2009, no action has been taken. Under those circumstances, without expressing any opinion on merits, the respondents are directed to consider the legal notice dated 27/02/2009 got issued by the petitioner as a representation and dispose of the same on its own merits, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. __________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 21st April, 2010 SKM