IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12725 of 2011 ====================================================== Amit Ranjan S/O Umesh Kant Thakut, R/O Village Paira, P.S. - Singhwara, District - Darbhanga .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna 2. Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government Of Bihar, Vishweshwariya Bhwan, Bailey Road, Patna 3. Union Of India through Secretary, Rural Development, Government Of India , Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi 4. Joint Secretary (Rural Connectivity), Rural Development, Government of India , Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi 5. Project Manager CPWD, 6th Floor, Pant Bhawan, Patna 6. Sri G.M., NBCC Vijay Nagar, Rasbihari Path, Rukanpura, Patna 7. Joint General Manager, IRCON International, Sone Bhawan, Daroga Rai Path, Patna 8. General Manager, NPCC, IAS Colony, Kidwaipuri, Patna 9. Cheif Engineer (Incharge) PMSY, NHPC , Vidyut Bhwan, Patna .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For Union of India : Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ray Saurabh Nath, A.C. to A.A.G.6 For the Respondent No.8 (NPCC) : Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== 3 16-11-2011 The matter is with regard to implementation of the scheme under Pradhan Mantri Gram Sarak Yojana (PMGSY) (Central Government Project) relating to 379 works for completion of 2018 km. in districts of Begusarai, Madhubani Darbhanga. Even though, the statement has been made with regard to inaction of the authorities, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Union of India as well as the State Government has submitted that no representation has been made to any of the authorities at the state level with regard to the inaction of any of the respondent. Under the above circumstances, we are of the opinion that 2 if the petitioner is so aggrieved by any inaction of any of the respondents, the same can be brought to the notice of the appropriate authority by way of a representation raising all the grounds raised in the writ petition and the same shall be disposed of by the authority concerned as expeditiously as possible.. With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. ASHWINI /- (T. Meena Kumari, J.) (Vikash Jain, J.)