IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 94/2008 Mr. Byron A. Xavier ....... Petitioner. Vs. State of Goa and others. ....... Respondents Mr. E. O. Mendez, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M. D. Salkar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, CJ & N.A. BRITTO, J. DATE : 18th March, 2008. P.C.:- The Counsel appearing for respondents No.1 to 3 submits that the resolution passed by the Panchayat, resolving to regularise the unauthorised construction has not been accepted by the Deputy Town Planner, who has categorically stated that the structure cannot be authorised. He further submits that respondent No.2 in exercise of his powers shall take appropriate decision, if necessary, after discussing the matter with the Village Panchayat, within four weeks from today. 2. In view of the statement made on behalf of the respondents, there is no occasion for this Court to issue notice or interfere in the writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. The respondents will abide by their statement. No order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE ssm