CRM No. M- 466 of 2009 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M- 466 of 2009 Decided on:- 28.1.2009 Paramjit Kashyap .....Petitioner Versus Pankaj and another .....Respondents And CRM No. M- 492 of 2009 Decided on:- 28.1.2009 Paramjit Kashyap .....Petitioner Versus Nardev Singh and others .....Respondents Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. C. Puri Present Mr. Ashok Giri, Advocate for the petitioners. K. C. Puri,J (Oral) By this order I intend to dispose of CRM Nos. M-466 of 2009, Paramjit Kashyap v. Pankaj and another and CRM No. M-492 of 2009, Paramjit Kashyap v. Nardev Singh and others as both have arisen from the same incident. This is a petition under Section 439(2) Cr. P. C for cancellation of anticipatory bail of the accused- respondents. The accused were granted concession of anticipatory bail in a complaint case as back as on 17.3.2005. As per further allegations, the accused attacked sister of the petitioner as back as on 14.11.2005 regarding which FIR No.343 of 2.11.2005 Annexure P4 has been registered against some of the accused under Sections 325, 323, 506, 148, 149 in Police Station Jalandhar, P. S. Divn. No. 4 . It is further submitted that some of the accused threatened the complainant regarding which again FIR Annexure P5 No. 165 dated 28.6.2006, under Sections 341, 427, 148, 149 IPC, Police Station Jalandhar, P. S. Divn. No. 4 has been registered. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that accused have been granted anticipatory bail without issuing notice to the petitioner. However, this grouse has been raised after a period of four years. The other occurrence is stated to be of the year 2005-06. The petitioner has approached the Court for cancellation CRM No. M- 466 of 2009 2 of bail for which he remained unsuccessful. From the whole of the allegations, no case is made out for cancellation of the bail. So, both the petitions stands dismissed. January 28, 2009 ( K. C. Puri ) mamta Judge