S;B. fServiee Matter) INTHEHON'BLEHIGHGGajR^Ol-'eHHATTISGARHAT BILASPURfeHHA'mSGARHl WRrFPETmONfS) N6. y^%/2010. PETmONER: .^^^ -•>(^^^^ y^.i^fi^^^.1'' ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Mohan Ram Ohdar, ason ofLate SukraRamplidaT.agedaboutQS years, Retired Head Master, residence pfvillage Badapara, Post Tildega, Patthalgaon, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. yersus Rfispondeilts 1. Sfate of Chhatiiisgarh, Through Secretaiy, Educatioh DepaTtment, D.K.S.Bhawa.n, Raipur ehhattisgaTh. 2. District Educatkm Officer, Jashpur, ©istrictJashpur,Cliha.ttisgarh. 3.*~3oinVDiTe8toT,Accoiints,;Ti^sup^^a^ Pensiori, ^BilaspuT, District Bilaspur, 4. Joint Director, Aecounts, 'Treasyry and Pension.Ainliilsapur^DistnctSar^uja, Chfaattisgarh. WRI'RREnnONUNDERA^ei^SSe.O^'FHE CCmSTTFUTIQN'QF^INDM ^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ :B^ !&* -.-•^s^'s-;. :'"'£'v%, —78 sti^rw Wt* WT SD^T Sflliqi HWW <tlHI<*> s'^-^i^ici'ii, BTi)yJi<o, fsx'iiyy ..l^..f...Q;.....^J..7..3/4g 200 sn^r'T^? ('j?^'5'1^) ^WSR ^t^T ^Tf^fT aB: Hori'uieSiiiiManmdraMo 20-08-2010 onri U.j.K.. KaO, COunSei Tuf toe petiiioner. La'wyer for the State/responGents on onn' vinofl ieKarn. r'anei ^.^~ .^I-,- - aavance copy. Learned counsei Tor the petltjoner subrnits that as fhe pension case of the petjtjoner »vas not ssttied and eariier filed petition before this Coilirt was iinailv aisposed offvide order matter' was refeiTed to the Retirai Dpss petitioner submits that fhough the p| Retirai Dues Con'in'iittee, tiii uate thel oijirt registerea as W.P.(S) 7401/08 which d^tea 17/12/08 (Annexurs P/3) 'wherein the ine meaniirne, on ine 'oasis OT eariie no»v resporiuerit / D'istrict EuuCi peiitiorier 'vide letter dated 22/1 I20i recovery proceeaings againsi in6 pef:iuoner Accordingiy, it is uirectea tnat petitioner js flnaiiv uecjded bv' ^T^fifttT 'RTO^f ^ f^^ <Fai^l< ^aTfinaiiin &nnv'asiava, <s. etirai dues vv'ere vy'itnrieici, tne petitiunei" uomminee. Learneci counssi Tor ine 'titionef' 'was caiieci 10 appear Derore ine n'latter has t'lut been finaiiv settied a'nu in oraer aaiea ^wuo/^uuy iAnnexure ri^.'i, Euucaijon Officer, Jashpur has required fne p (Annexure P/1) foiio'wed by ietter dated [he aiteged arnount of excess payrnent of jifi"^u~iU (nnnexure i-74.i to aeposi KS.JJ.^^O/-. This Court referred the casfe uf the oetitioner to the Retirai Duss Committee on 17/12/08 to consider 'with iaw. Therefore, uniess the cuci case of the petitioner, it 'would not ^s pna pass necessary oraer in accoruance hmittee corne to anv finai decision of the s>e proper for respondent No.2 to finaijse ,'^S i >5-i-^-?^r Sr—.'^-?-. 3 ^..J.:—.—^,- A.;^ unii'i ine rnatier reiaung 10 ine case OT ine me Keiiraf uues uomFTiittee/5-''ension ' T ,.*ISl,l •E' 'f' • J/; ^^XI-HC—PS '3^[—4|<1iyq, yflly'Ko, facliy^ _...^£D.M^^!]2. Ultldl (hMlcb ••""-•—••••-•^200 31I^7[ TR^? ('yi^'iS) Sf^V W h-f TT<?T 3TI^T sh^icn ^„ . . _ ^^. JL A <- ptter QaLea ^^/i/zuiu (rtnnexure 1-71) anci t be macie. 11 after the tinai decision 01 i-.ommiitee; recovery pursuani 10 3/7/2010 (Annexure P/4) shaii no| pension case OT me petitioner, tne such recovery is started, petltionei the iaw. With the aforesaid obsQrvatitins, the petltion is finaiiy disposed oft pToresaici amouni is siiii TOUHO ou©ano sriy 'wouid be at iibeity to avail rernedy under 1^1iiri-'?Tlfr'T TTW^f '^' fs^ <Fin^l< ^3lfiPT3tlt?I Sd-/ Manindra Mohan Shrivastava ''"'=->.-1,,-. Judge J-.