Court No.2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 4094 OF 2001 (Old No. 7508 of 1999) Smt.Aqeelan …………….. Petitioner Versus Deputy Director of Consolidation/ Additional District Magistrate (Nazul), Udham Singh Nagar and others. …………. Respondents. …………………. Sri Lokendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri H.M.Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the State/respondent Nos. 1, to 3. Sri Rajeev Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 & 5. Date: Aug. 06,2008. Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking writ of certiorari for quashing the impugned judgment and order dated 30.01.1999 passed by respondent No.1 in Revision case No. 52/105 of 1996-97, Bihari Lal and another versus Smt.Muradan Begum and another. 2. Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 have filed revision before the Additional District Magistrate (Nazool)/Deputy Director, Consolidation, Udhamsingh Nagar against the order dated 20.07.1991 passed by Settlement Officer, Nainital in Appeal No.501. The revisional court set aside the order passed by appellate court, vide impugned order dated 20.07.1991 and remanded the case for fresh decision in the light of observation made in the judgment. The revisional court recorded its finding that the 2 respondent No.2 has wrongly held that the order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer could not be interfered with by the Consolidation Officer. I find no error or mistake in the judgment of revisional court by which the matter was remanded for decision afresh in accordance with law. Therefore, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. 3. The writ petition is devoid of merit and is dismissed. No order as to costs. (P.C.Verma,J.) 06.08.2008 P.Singh