IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1354 of 2008 MANJU DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 20.07.2010 The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 23.09.2008, relevant portion of which reads as under: “Lwfpdk dh vksj ls vf/kdkj-i= ds lkFk gkftjh nh x;ha k okn iqdkjk x;k k lqfpdk vius vf/koDrk lfgr U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gqbZ k vafrd izfrosnu ij vfHk;kstu inkf/kdkjh o lwfpdk dks lquk k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k k vuqla/kku dRrkZ ds vuqla/kkuksaijkUr vafre izfrosnu rF; dh eqy lefiZr fd;k gS k rFkk lwfpdk }kjk fojks/ak i| Hkh fn;k x;k gS k” Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in particular facts of the case when the allegation is of killing of her husband while in police custody, it will be difficult for her to produce witnesses. It appears from the impugned order itself that a protest was already filed on behalf of the informant. Upon submission of final form opining mistake of fact, notices were issued to her and she appeared in the proceeding whereafter the impugned order was passed. Having regard to the course of action taken by learned Magistrate, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order. The application is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )