IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH JANUARY 2011 / 29TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1917 of 2011(L) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.NISAR, S/O.IBRAHIMKUTTY, AGED 33 YEARS, KAVUMTHARA A.U.P.SCHOOL, P.O.KAVIL-673 614, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, TRIVANDRUM-14. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673 020. 4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PERAMBRA, P.O.PERAMBRA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673523. 5. THE MANAGER, KAVUMTHARA A.U.P.SCHOOL, P.O.KAVIL-673 614, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. R1 TO R4 BY G.P. SMT. NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.1917 of 2011-L - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 19th day of January, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner seeks for a direction to the Government to take a decision on Exts.P6 and P6(a) revision petitions filed respectively by the Manager and the petitioner. This is a case where the petitioner was appointed as an Arabic Teacher in Kavumthara A.U.P. School with effect from 2.12.2002. His probation was declared on 3.12.2003. He applied for leave without allowance for the period from 5.11.2007 to 4.11.2012. He got relieved from service on 9.12.2007 before sanctioning of leave and when disciplinary proceedings were initiated, he rejoined duty on 9.2.2009. The Government also permitted him to rejoin duty as per Ext.P3 order. 2. The present grievance of the petitioner relates to the non sanctioning of the post of Arabic Teacher for accommodating the petitioner. According to the petitioner, only two posts were sanctioned, but three posts were liable to be sanctioned. In appeal, even though the Deputy Director found the eligibility for the third post, he did not grant the same, which is evident from Ext.P5 order. Challenging Ext.P5, representations have been filed before the Government. wpc 1919/2011 2 3. There will be a direction to the Government to take a decision on Exts.P6 and P6(a), after hearing the parties, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the Government for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/