hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1996 OF 2011 Aman Palace CHS Ltd. ... Petitioner Versus Union of India and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. D.H. Mehta i/by M/s. D.M. Legal Associates for the petitioner. Ms. Poornima Awasthi for respondent/Union of India. Ms. P.A. Purandare, respondent Corporation. CORAM : P.B. MAJMUDAR & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 22, 2011 P.C. Grievance of the petitioner is that even though the structure is beyond 500 sq. yards. from the signaling station parapet, yet the petitioner has been directed not to carry out further development work. According to petitioner, the Corporation has also granted permission and objection is only taken by the Secretary of the Ministry of Defence. In our view, whether the construction of the petitioner is within 500 sq. 1 hvn yards or out side is not the question which we can decide in writ petition. Petitioner is at liberty to make representation to the Ministry of defencne, through its secretary who has issued impugned directions. The representation be made within two weeks form today and after hearing the petitioner and considering the record, appropriate orders be passed within four weeks thereafter. The said decision may be taken as per its own merit and as per law. Subject to what is stated above, petition disposed of. 2. In case the learned counsel for the petitioner makes representation, their contention that the Defence could have not issued such directions is kept open for consideration in future and petitioner is permitted to take out appropriate proceedings in case their representation is rejected by the Authorities. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) (P.B. MAJMUDAR,J.) 2