IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 8894 of 2005 Between: Sri P. Sudhakar Reddy, S/o. Late Sri P. lInga Reddy, Central Excise Department, R/o. H.No. 2-2-1075/13, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner, Munkicipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Tankbund, Hyderabad. 2 m,/s. Jaya Constructions, Rep. by Sri K. Ravi Kumar, Plot No. 5 Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad. 3 Sri A.V. Bhaskar Reddy, S/o. Sri Govind Reddy, Plot No. 5 Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad. 4 Smt. Padmavathi, W/o. Sri A.V. Bhaskar Reddy, Plot No. 5 Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Orderor direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent No. 1 to see that the construction activity by the Respondent Nos 2 to 4l in Plot No.5, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad.shall asper the sanctioned plan and if the REspondent No.s 2 to 4 deviate th econstruction, the Respondent No.1 shall initiate necessary action against the Respondent No.s 2 to 4 and pass such other or further order or ordersl, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances ofthe case. Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.KALPANA EKBOTE Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.RAMA RAO GHANTA HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO. 8894 OF 2005 ORAL ORDER: None appears for the petitioner and there is no representation. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. ____________________ V. ESWARAIAH, J Date: 26.03.2008 KA ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Commissioner, Munkicipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Tankbund, Hyderabad. 2. 2CCs to 3. 2CD copies