IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-15931 of 2008 Date of decision:12.01.2009 Smt. Sunita Vig. .....Petitioner versus Karamjit Kaur .....Respondent BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Sandeep Wadhawan Advocate for Mr. Vikram K.Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.L.Saini, Advocate for respondent. Rajan Gupta, J(Oral) Counsel for the respondent points out that the impugned order is revisable before the Court of Sessions, which remedy has not been exercised by the petitioner. The petitioner is relegated to the remedy by filing the revision before the Court of Sessions. In addition, the petitioner would be at liberty to move an application for seeking condonation of delay in filing the revision before the Court of Sessions on the ground that he was pursuing his remedy before this Court. Mr. Saini does not oppose this prayer. The petition is disposed of. [RAJAN GUPTA] JUDGE 12th January, 2009 Skaushik