1 caa14.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Civil Application No. 14 of 2011 IN Appeal from Order No. 10 of 2011 Maruti Ranu Bhalerao ...Applicant v/s. Swapnil Maruti Bhalerao & ors. ...Respondents Mr. S.S.Kulkarni for the applicant. Mr. T.D.Deshmukh for the respondent. CORAM: R.M. BORDE, J. 21st September, 2011 PC: The appellant-original plaintiff is taking exception to the order passed on 24th November, 2010 below exhibit 5 in Special Civil Suit No. 947/2010. The trial Court while allowing the application restrained the defendant from creating third party interest in respect of property sold to him by accused no.1 vide Sale Deed on 24th March, 2009 and 28th April, 2009 till the decision of the suit. The defendant no.1 is also restrained from creating third party interest. The defendant no.1 is further restrained from getting created any interest in his favour in respect of the suit property till the decision of the suit. 2. The application was tendered by the plaintiff seeking an order of injunction against the defendants from interfering in peaceful possession and also from enforcing possession over the suit property by illegal means. The plaintiff also claimed an order of injunction against the defendant restraining him from creating third party interest as well as restraining from getting 2 caa14.11.sxw executed any document, creating any interest in his favour in respect of the suit property. The trial Court, however, did not pass order in favour of the plaintiff restraining the defendants from obstructing his possession or enforcing possession by illegal means. The plaintiff as such has approached this Court complaining about denial in granting relief as claimed by her in the application at Exhibit 5 to its full extent. There was, however, no challenge to the part of the order granting relief in favour of the plaintiff and against defendant no.1 by virtue of order dated 24th November, 2010. At the time of consideration of appeal from order, this Court was pleased to continue the order of status-quo granted by the Lower Court until further orders. The Lower Court by virtue of order passed on 10th May, 2010 directed the defendants to maintain status-quo. The said order passed on 10th May, 2010 is continued by the High Court while passing order on 12th January, 2011 and the ad-interim relief granted by the High Court on 12th January, 2011 is continued from time to time and is operative as on today. 3. The ends of justice would be met if the order passed by this Court continuing interim-relief granted by the trial Court on 10th May, 2010 by virtue of order dated 12th January, 2011 is continued for further period until disposal of the Suit and directions are issued to the trial Court to dispose of the suit expeditiously. The Appeal from Order can be disposed of by directing trial Court to dispose of Special Civil Suit No. 947/2010 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within one year from today. 4. The ad-interim order passed by the trial Court on 10th May, 2010 which has been continued by Court by virtue of order dated 12th January, 2011 from time to time shall remain operative till disposal of suit. Appeal from Order stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 caa14.11.sxw 5. In view of disposal of Appeal from Order, Civil Application do not survive and stands disposed of. The final writ be transmitted forthwith. (R.M.BORDE, J)