IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 266 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 06/02/2009 in WP NO : 7557 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: S. Ravi Shankar S/o. Late S.Nagaiah R/o. H.No. 5-5-229, Sarojinidevi Lay Out, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ..... APPELLANT AND Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupathi, Rep. by its Registrar. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:PARTY-IN-PERSON Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.KASAJAGANMOHAN REDDY The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 266 of 2009 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) This writ appeal is filed by the petitioner seeking to set aside the order of the learned single Judge passed in W.P.M.P.No:618 of 2009 on 6.2.2009 including the order dated 16.10.2008 passed in W.P.No:7557 of 2008. The appellant herein is the writ petitioner. He filed the writ petition seeking to declare the action of the respondents in continuing the petitioner under suspension beyond two years pursuant to proceedings No.E-III/2/2006, dated 20.3.2006 as arbitrary and to set aside the suspension order dated 20.3.2006 with a further direction to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits. The learned single Judge having considered the rival contentions disposed of the writ petition directing the respondents-authorities to consider whether there is any necessity of keeping the petitioner under suspension any further or not and pass appropriate orders within a period of four Weeks from the date of the order. Pursuant to the said order, the respondents-authorities having considered the matter, passed an order stating that there is necessity of keeping the petitioner under suspension. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has filed Review W.P.M.P.618 of 2009. The learned single Judge having observed that no interference can be made with the order passed in W.P.No:7557 of 2008 on 16.10.2008, dismissed the review W.P.M.P. Having aggrieved by the same, the present appeal is preferred by the writ petitioner. Heard the learned counsel and perused the entire material available on record. When the matter is taken up hearing, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents-authorities while adducing the proceedings in E.III (4)/UE.R1/2009, dated 28.3.2009 issued by the Registrar, Sri Venkateswara University before this Court, submitted that pursuant to the undertaking given before the Division Bench of this Court in this appeal to post the writ petitioner in the non focal post, the petitioner has been reinstated into service with immediate effect pending enquiry on the charges leveled against him subject to the ratification and further orders of the Executive Council, S.V. University, Tirupathi. In the present facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the above proceedings, We feel that the order under appeal needs no interference. Accordingly, this writ appeal is closed. However, it is made clear that this order shall not preclude the authorities from conducting the enquiry pending against the petitioner in accordance with the rules. ________________________ Justice T.Meena Kumari ___________________________ Justice Vilas V. Afzulpurkar Dated: 30th March, 2009 gurc. THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 266 of 2009 (Order of the Division Bench delivered by the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) 30th March, 2009