IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 6TH JULY 2009 / 15TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 18867 of 2009(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.S.SUKUMARAN NAIR, AGED 88 YEARS, S/O.LATE SIVARAMAKURUP, PARVATHY NILAYAM, ALATHARA, SREEKARIYAM P.O., TVM., REP. BY HIS DULY CONSTITUTED P/A.HOLDER S.DILEEP KUMAR, 38 YRS, S/O.SUKUMARAN NAIR, R/AT.PARVATHY NILAYAM, ALATHARA, SREEKARIYAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.THOMAS M.JACOB SRI.G.RAJAGOPAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, CHERUVACKAL VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.R.SREELATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P. (C) No.18867 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 6th day of July, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is aggrieved by the proceedings taken by the second respondent under the Kerala Land Conservancy Act as evidenced by Exts.P4 and P5. According to the petitioner, he has been in possession of a land having an extent of 26.30 Ares for several years. In fact, according to him, his father came into possession of the property more than 80 years ago and thereafter he continued in possession. He has also applied for assignment of said land under the Land Assignment Act. No orders have been passed. In the meanwhile Exts. P4 and P5 has been issued by the Additional Tahsildar. Since it did not reveal any reason, petitioner has sought for revocation of the same by filing Ext.P6. Petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Exts. P4 and P5. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader also. It is only appropriate that Exts.P4 and P5 are treated as show cause notices. WPC. No.18867 OF 2009 : 2 : 3. Accordingly, the second respondent shall consider Ext.P6 petition, and pass a detailed order, after hearing the petitioner. Obviously Exts.P4 and P5 can be enforced only after orders are passed on Ext.P6. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (V.GIRI, JUDGE) jma