LPA No. 1525 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 1525 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 06, 2011 Sukhjinder Singh and others …Appellants Versus Punjabi University Patiala and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. Tushar Sharma, Advocate for the appellants Mr. D.S. Patwalia, Advocate for respondent-Caveator 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against order dated 03.06.2011 rendered by the learned Single Judge holding that the selection for the post of Workshop Instructor is vitiated on account of lack of criteria applied by the Selection Committee and also non-preparation of any merit list. In pursuance of provision of Right to Information Act, 2005, the appellant filed an application and obtained a copy of the list containing the names of candidates who were interviewed on 24.09.2009 to 29.09.2009. It shows the grading of the candidate, which is claimed to be signed by all the three members of the LPA No. 1525 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Selection Committee. Be that as it may, if some new facts are sought to be brought on record, which were not before the learned Single Judge then the proper remedy for the appellant would be to file an appropriate application before the learned Single Judge along with all the newly available documents. Accordingly, we relegate the appellant to a remedy before the learned Single Judge as per law. 2. Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of in the above terms. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE September 06, 2011 Atul