WP(C) 4734/2003 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. R.M. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for t he respondent Bank. The petitioner, who had obtained a fishery loan of Rs.2, 25,857/- vide Lo an Account No. M.T. (F) 432 from the Barama Branch of the Pragjyotish Gaonlia B ank, challenges the direction dated 12.3.03 of the Branch Manager, whereby the p etitioner has been directed to repay the capital amount of Rs.2,23,857/- and int erest up to 31.3. 03 amounting to Rs.1,89,920/-, i.e. total outstanding of Rs.4, 15,577/-. Mr. Choudhury, learned counsel contends that the fishery set up through bank fin ance was inundated by flood which resulted in heavy loss because and that is how the petitioner was unable to repay the loan and the interest accrued thereon. T he representation filed to the Bank authorities requesting for waiver of interes t and to permit the petitioner to pay the principal dues in instalments is also referrd by Mr. Chouhury. Although no counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent Bank and none is present on their behalf, I am of the view that the request for loan waiver and i nstallment repayment is something which can be considered only by the Bank and t here can be no Court direction in this regard. Accordingly, this case is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to file a fre sh representation before the Bank and the respondents are directed to consider, if any such representation is filed by the petitioner, by considering the merit of the representation as per the norms applicable. The case is disposed of accordingly.