1 63 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8583/2009 Adat Khan & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 16th September 2009. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr.Subodh Jangid,for the petitioner. .... BY THE COURT In this petition, the grievance has been stated in the manner that the petitioners belong to 'Below Poverty Line' (BPL) category and a list of priority-cum-seniority for the purpose of Indira Awas Scheme was prepared but when allotting the funds for construction of the houses, the petitioners, who were the selected persons and standing rather in the seniority, were not granted the funds. While considering the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner was posed the question if the petitioners have at all made a representation or served a notice stating their grievance? The learned counsel submitted that in the similar nature writ petition bearing number 6255/2009, this Court has issued directions that the petitioners shall make representation to the Block Development Officer who would decide the same in accordance with law; and has placed for perusal a photostat of the order dated 06.07.2009 as passed in CWP No.6255/2009. 2 The present writ petition was filed only on 02.09.2009 and it is rather inexplicable that the petitioners, though being aware of the order passed by this Court in CWP No.6255/2009 for making representation to the Block Development Officer, have chosen not to make such representation before approaching this Court. There appears no reason to entertain this writ petition or issue any directions in this matter particularly when the petitioners are seeking the relief in the nature of mandamus without even serving a notice or making a representation. Accordingly, this writ petition stands rejected. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. s.soni