'l ^ ^' i^ /f IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR /CHHATTJSGA.RH) CIVIL REVISION No. _'_l_^T_/2006 f( SinBte Bencff PETITIONER x^\^ ^ RESPONDENTS Driver Owner Amit Kumar Soni aged about 30 years, S/o Ram Kumar Soni, by Caste Sonar, R/o Vishwanath Colony, Thana , Tahsil And Distt, Chhattarpur (M.P.) Present Address, Sanjay Para Bhanupratappur Distt. Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS Sanjay Kumar Thakur, aged about 24yea.rs, S/o RamvilasThakur, R/o G.G. Mandal, Ghatroad, Dakshineshwar Road Calcutta West Bengal Bhagwan Das Vyapar Udyog Ltd. 194, S.P. Mukerjee Road, Calcutta West Bengal 3. The New Assurance India, Calcutta, WestBengal ^" 2. ^£^^' REVISION PETITION UNDER SECTION 115 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908 TTPTcH^1TF^ ^ssf ^NIrt^, u>-al<<-i<i<o, Rirti'<-iyx <C.^Mo. 1(2-/^^o6 @ ^200 ^,, OT^^T^f^Ttcp ??an3n^?Ta?:RTEp ^ ^ ^Q.^' 3TT^?T q^P (yil^qcg) ^!?cnaR;fff^T3TI^?T 11.08.2006 Shri Parag Kotech^, Heard on admissioi tlo This revision is di 20.7.2006 by which, fh^ allow an appUcation fo\ liberty to file a fresh clai^p. Leamed counsel fol applicaiit could not file) and driving license etc, t|: the claim wifh Hberty those documents. In the opinion of th| eiftier drivuig license o| filing a claim under Secj Act. The claim can simpl required, may be filed at the time of evidenc Tribunal and on this ba permitted to be wifhdraw^i in this revision. The revision is rected against fhe order dated Claims Tribunal has refused to withdrawal of the claun wifh petition. fhe applicant submits fhat fhe fhe copies of registi'ation book |ierefore, he wanted to withdraw file a fresh claim along wifh <ihi^ilci>41vi HP^f^fe^ <<Rt^K ^3:rf^T3TT^^T counsel for the applicant. [s Court, it is not required to file registration certificate, while tion 166 of the Motor Vehicles y be filed and the documents, if or th^ may be called throug^i fhe agenqy of the .sis only, the clami can not be L. There appears to be no merits su^sequently dismlissed. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge v^' SP/FS/2005-20,000 7^ .^.- ^