$-21 &$-22 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.N1.C.2666/2010 AMARPAL&ORS. s.K. Manan,Advocate Versus Petitioner L,, Respondent STATEGOV.TOF NCT OF DELHI TiiroughMr. SunilSharma,Addl. PP AND + CRL.Wl.C.2669/2010 KUMARADITYA@ADITYAARYA&ORS. Petitioner ThrougiiMr. H.S. Diiilion,Advocate Versus STATEOF GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Respondent TlirougliMr. SunilSlnarma,Add). PP CORAM: JUSTICESHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA ORDER o/„ 06.01.2011 Thesetwo petitionshavebeenfiled by the petitioners,for quashingof crossFlRs iodgedby the petitionersagainsteach-otherafterquar^i. The FlRsare underSection 308/34 and 323/325/34iPC respectively.Consideringthe nature of quarreland in the facts and circumstancesofthe case,iconsiderthatit would be appropriatethatinstead of quashingthe FIRs on the basisof compromise,the petitionersbe directedto execute bondsof good behaviourto maintainpeace,foraperiodoftwo years, in the sum of Rs. 60,000/-each with one suretyin the like amounteach to the satisfactionof trial coHrt concerned. Signing Date:14.08.2024 17:17:56 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified (p. - I It is ordered accordingly. Further proceedings in the FIRs shall not take place after execution of bonds of good behaviour by each of the petitioners, as stated above. It is made clear that, during the period of these two years, if any criminal act is done by the petitioners/accused persons, these FIRs shall stand revived. The petitions' are disposed of in the above terms. SHIV N^R^ANDHINGRA,J JANUARY 06, 2011/acm