^^1^^ 1 ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER: V .••*' .^/ <y ^w ^w ;A^cy ^ ^^ RESPONDENTS: W.P.C. No... ..^3 J:?.^..!....../2010 EastemTrack Udyog Pvt. Ltd. A company registered under the bndian Comparues Acf, 1956, through- ifs Director, Subhash Kedia, aged about 47 years, S/o Late Shci Haiiram Kedia, Registered Office at 41 NSO, 4* Floor, Room No. 406, Kolkata, 700001(West Bengal) VERSUS 1. Prindpal Chief Engineer South Eastem Central Railway Annex Building, Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Research Designs and Standards Orgaruzation Through Director Generat/QA-Civil Manak Nagar, Lucknow (U.P.) 3. GeneralManager , South Eastem Central Railway Annex Building, Bilaspur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE^CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- HIGHCOURTOFCHHAfTISGARHaATBILASPUR W.P. (CVNo. 3651 of 2010 Petitioner Respondents Eastern Track Udyog Pvt. Ltd. Versus Principal Chief Engineer, South Eastern Central Railway & Others. WrjiPetition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India DB: Hon'ble Shri Justice I.M. Quddusi & Hon'ble Shri Justice N. K. Agarwal. Present Shri Varun Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Naushina Ali, Advocate for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 21SI day of Ju!y, 2010) Per I.M. Quddusi, J. Having heard the arguments of learned counsel appearing for the parties, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner desires to withdraw this petition, therefore, wthout making any observations, we dismiss this petition as withdrawn. This order will not debar the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy that may be available to him under the provisions of law. No order as to costs. Sd;- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge Sahu