r' K HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BiLASPUR Writ Petjtion (Cj No. 3950 of 2007 Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Jagdish Bhalla, Acting ChiefJustsce PETiTjONER Sanjay Agrawai, aged about 45 years, S/o. Ramkishan Agrawal, R/o. Chhattisgarh Distributors above Saiuja Tent House, Ramsagarpara, Raipur, Dist Raipur, CG. RESPONDENTS 3) 4) Rajkumar Gupta, S/o. Late Bharat Prasad Gupta, aged about 40 years, r/o. Sikoisbhata, Durg, Dist. Durg, CG. •th 2) 5"' Addit'onal District Judge, Durg, Dist. Durg, CG. State of Chhattisgarh, through Sscretary, Law & Company Affairs, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, CG. Chhatiisgarh Distributors through Proprietor Satlsh Agrawa!, S/o. Late Ramkishan Agrawai, Wo. Chhattisgarh Distributors above Saiuja Tent House, Ramsagarpara, Raipur, Dist. Raipur, CG. (Writ Petition underArticie 227 ofthe Constitution of india) Present: Shri C..I Sahu, counsel for the petitioner. Harit, Dy. Advocate Generai for the S1 (Passed on 9th July, 2007) The petitioner has approached this Court after being aggrieved by the impugned order passed by the Execution Court wherein the otsjections were rejected by speaking order. Hovvever, accordlrig to the petitioner, he had 2- entered into an agreement with opposite party No.1. and after depositing Rs.60,000/- he could not deposit rest of the money within She prescribed time. Therefore, now the opposite party moved an appiication to recover Rs.50,000/- instead of Rs.12,000/-. !n this connection, the petitioner moved an appllcation before the trial Court with a prayer that the decree be confined to Rs.60,000/- only but the said appiication was rejected by the Execution court. 2) Counsel for the petitioner faited to substantiate any iilegaiity in the impugned order. Therefore, no further interference is warranted by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingiy, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- Acting ChiefJustice •Is