^1" *'" II THE HIffil COURT OP JUDICATUnE JST .TKB&EETaS^fep) PETISION UNDSR AREICLB 226 RSAD WITH AR7ICL3 227 OF THE COESTITUTION GF I^TOIA H.P.NO.:!;X--'/ 1997 ts.wKss^as pt[2si3>SBtlBEjg EETITIONBS Respondents; Chlkltsak Grah Nlrrnan Saas-tha Maryadit, Rajnandgson, througti the President Dr. San-tosh Kuo Khandelwal, ac?ed about.42 vesrs s/o Iste Shri Badrinarayen Khsndelwal, r/o Rair-e.dhin Marg, -Rajnandcraon. Vs« 1. Manicipal ''orporation Rajnanderson, throua the Commissionar, Municioal Corpor.? tion, ZiaJ nsndgaoa. 2. Commissioner Mnnicipal '-orporation, Rajaandgaon. XI-HC-22 3TI^!^I 'f?;ri'q?3^i -«T!JR?-Hlt^r ys^ ^raicTq, •swms, N^n u'p' 1^0 • ^zi^l^l "^ 2( '2_ 3TR^'^KiTW~H!??I 19.06.2002 Shri Atul Anand A'A'asttty; with Shri Anand Shukla, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Mohd. Nasir. counseI. for the respondent; Sv this writ petition filed Constitution of India, petition! order dated 04.8.1997 (Annexi|u-e P-17) whereby respondent no.2 had du-ected for revocjation of pennission t.o the petitioner regarding constructi^n of the building roads, drains 1 etc., on the land aUotted to fhe|petitioner. Petitioner is a registered <);o-operative society which has 3^];?T>fp; Hl'-lft'! ^ fWt Tf^P ^ ^^i'Pj' 3T?^T i-mder Articles 226/227 ofthe :r prays for quashing of the been resi uncter the provp.sions of section 9 of M.P. Co- operative Societies Act 1960.1 Counsel for the petitioner subraits that the petitioner's ^ociety was accordecl sanction and permission for constructi^n of buildtngs, roads, dralns etc., on tlie la-ad allotted to thdm aiid the Petitioner's societv [4^tfeq XI-HC-22 ^Sf '^ll^lclij, tTifrFTTC, [stclKHy '^^a ^^. ^i! .f?;iN;sn^i si7qWHi??I has spent huge amount However, respondent no.2, th. )oration, Rainandgaon h|as revoked the perraission ;ranted to the Society. Return has been filed b^ has been stated that the impui 'hi^yl'il-] TV^ -q TST3t TM q; 3]1^t( s-n^T nt ot' the 1s Comiaissioner of Municipal the respondents in whlch it :ned order has been passed on account of breach of conditidns bv the petitioner which T resulted in accumiilation of ratb water and drain water m tlie vicinift'" creattng health hazajrd to fhe public and the petitioner Society had to inak^ arrangeinents for providing baslc facilities like WBM Road, IPacca drains, ciilverts for free flow of draln water. Annexitire P-16 is the letter dated 17.7.1995 addressed^ to the p^titioner by respondent no. 1 also shown the reason for sus^ending the developinent work that the petitioner did not niak^ arrangements for way out of the draln water and raln wlater which has resulted in accumulation of dtrtv water in the victnity and due to which pn" XI-HC-2: 'S^ ^qpTRTO, '^rftWTS, (si<?li<1;l< '^*? w, 1:?:IFB'3W ai^WHf^I sii^i s^irw :gf^ js(»a,iEa3|i%fft various kinds of diseases have out to the Budasagar is blockeid and the pressui'e froin the feTFf 'ETFR'f ^ TS^t <fsr i?3lf:OT3TI^i |been spreading and the way public is inounting on the authojrities. . It is also pointed out 1 that thc developDient and suprv|sion fee was not pald. Counsel for the petitionerlon the other hand contends that fhe order dated 04.8.1991 passed without giving opportuni|y of hearing to fhe petitior.er Vi'hich is arbitrary, Ulegal and a^ainst. the principle of natural justice. Counsel for the petition^r subiuits that so far as the legal charges is concerned, th^y shall be paid on demaiid from the respondents. Having considered the facjts and circumstances of the 7 Annexure P-17 has been case and inateripl onrecord andlthat the irapugned order has been passed without giving opj^ortiinity to the petitioner, in the opiaion of this Court 17.7.1995 (Annexure P-16) and tliie unpugned orders dated jdated 4.8.1997 (Aunexure P-VI') 3-HC-22 75? "41<)lc)<(, lOTTiy'ltf, ^diy^ snq'^^ii .1" ' 3TH?T '^'•^^ ^T?c[ sntT iraiw ^afeT ^.(-( ...',,s^KS^ ^l^jjiW^ fo-0; 17^ passed by respondent no.2 are accordingly set. aside. ^fiFfeih ^TPTCif'? TSi3t l-fSR3R' ^ 3Tf^FT ?IIq?T deserve to be set aside and However, it is open to the jrespondents /Corporation to irupose ^ such developjmental/supervision charges on the petitioner's society by ralsini demaiid is made, the petitioijier society shall pay such charges in accordance with law. <At:iwu..ufcirt' d(Bu.u< lSVi'^A^Ai-^to inav ,'construct the drairife for frd ^~^~ necessan' the Corooration ^" flow of water in accordance with the lav out, so that no heAlth hazard ^Sl aris^aeeM'hc. &A:&Fe<3'& Wlth the dtrecti j disposed ofaX\^ ^y Wtt»^W CerttBed PJiotocopv be surfplied to the parties 1S (X))?£65. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge *1- ^ 1-~ ^ [^'er^sT