IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16752 of 2010 BALESHWAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 24.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail in connection with a case registered under Sections 302, 147, 148, 149 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that police after investigation submitted final form against the accused persons including the petitioner but subsequently that order got reversed by the High Court on the ground that informant had not been noticed before accepting the final form and thereafter cognizance was taken. Other similarly situated accused persons namely Dharmendra Yadav, Rachhaya Yadav, Munni Yadav and others have been granted bail by different Benches of this Court which is also reflected from the computer report. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the informant that there is specific allegations against the petitioner in the F.I.R. and from the impugned order also it appears that the statement of eye witnesses have deliberately not been recorded by the investigating 2 agency. Considering the fact that the police submitted final form against the petitioner and the other similarly situated accused persons have been granted bail, for the purposes of bail only, let the petitioner namely Baleshwar Yadav, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 40 of 2005. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)