IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7924 of 2010 SUMAN KUMAR, Son of Sri Bishwanath Singh, R/o Chechul, P.S. Naubatpur, District Patna …. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …. Opposite Party ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Shakti Sumant Kumar, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr. Pawan Kr. Chaurasia, A.P.P. For the informant : Mr. Rajnish Kant, Advocate ------- 2 12.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 447, 324, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is not the assailant of the victim, rather specific allegation of firing at him is on Amit Kumar causing injury. Petitioner is stated to be in custody since 29.10.2009. Learned counsel for the informant submitted that on the instigation of the petitioner the occurrence had taken place. In the facts and the circumstances of the - 2 - case, the petitioner, SUMAN KUMAR, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Sanjiv Kumar Rai, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Danapur in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 127 of 2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation then the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the informant submits that all the accused persons including the - 3 - petitioner are relatives and they extend threats. After release, if the petitioner indulges in any kind of misuse of the privilege of bail, the informant would be at liberty to take appropriate steps. Spd/ (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)