1 S.B. Civil writ petition No.10404/2009 Hari Lal Masar & Ors. vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order dated 13.1.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.PR Mehta, for the petitioners. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioner in pursuance of the advertisement dated 13.8.2008 modified on 2nd June, 2009 appeared for the examination conducted for selection on the post of Compounder/Nurse (Ayured) Junior Grade. The petitioners admittedly could not succeed in the said examination as they secured less marks. The contention of the petitioners is that respondents wrongly determined the vacancies for the TSP Area, which petitioner's came to know when petitioners received the information from the competent authority on 11th Nov., 2009 and, therefore, it is clear that the respondents have wrongly determined the vacancies of TSP Area and because of that determination of vacancies, the petitioners have been denied appointment. Since the petitioners had full knowledge of the 2 determination of the vacancies from beginning and even if because of any reason had no knowledge of this fact then there is no explanation for the delay by which the petitioners obtained the information under Right to Information Act. After this delay, the petitioners are not entitled to any equitable relief. Further, in case the petitioners would have succeeded in the examination and in case they would have got the appointment under this selection process then they would not have challenged this advertisement and process of selection. It is settled law that a person who takes a chance and failed cannot allow to challenge the action of the respondents after taking chance. In view of the above, the writ petition has no merit and the same is hereby dismissed. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. cpgoyal/-