IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18955 of 2010 DEEPAK KUMAR SON OF RAM PARWESH PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAGWAN, P.O. NAGWAN, DISTRICT BUXAR--------PETITIONER Versus 1.THE UNION OF INDIA 2.D.G.P. CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE C.P.O. NEW DELHI 3.INSPECTOR GENERAL, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE BIHAR SECTOR, RAJEEV NAGAR, P.O. ASHIANA NAGAR DISTRICT PATNA 4.D.I.G. CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE GROUP CENTRE, MUZAFFARPUR 5.D.I.G. (ADM) B.S.H.QR. C.R.P.F. PATNA--------------------------RESPONDENTS ----------- For the petitioner :Mr.Subodh Kumar No.1, Advocate For the Union of India:Mr.Shiv Kumar, C.G.C. ----- 4. 14.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Central Government Counsel. The petitioner seeks a direction on the respondent authorities to issue appointment letter in his favour and further for quashing the letter dated 23.9.2010 by which reply to the legal notice of the petitioner has been given. The case of the petitioner is that he had applied for appointment of Constable (G.D.) in C.R.P.F. and had been called to appear for detailed medical examination also in which he was ultimately found fit. Despite the same no appointment letter has been issued in his favour although his name appears in the final merit list. In the counter affidavit the stand taken is that the petitioner belongs to the Scheduled Castes category and he 2 obtained only 36 marks; whereas the last selected candidate in the said category had obtained 39 marks and for the said reason the petitioner was not issued appointment letter although he may have been otherwise found suitable. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this Court does not find any merit in the writ petition as no right arises in favour of the petitioner since no candidate below him in the merit list has been appointed. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) Spal/