IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 14704 of 2008. Decided on: 20.06.2011. _________________________________________________ Smt. Guddi Devi. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No.5 as Part-Time Water Carrier in Government Primary School, Buai. In fact, the petitioner and respondent No.5 have submitted their applications for considering their candidature under Rule 12 of the Scheme. The petitioner claims that she belongs to I.R.D.P./B.P.L. family. Respondent No.5 also claims to be belonging to I.R.D.P./B.P.L. family. In order to ascertain their 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - status, the petitioner was permitted to supply the copy of I.R.D.P./B.P.L. certificates, within a period of ten days. This communication is dated 27th December, 2006. However, the petitioner could not submit the requisite certificates and instead made a representation to the Deputy Director, Primary Education, Kullu vide Annexure A-3, dated 9th January, 2007. 2. In sequel to the application submitted by respondent No.5, she was appointed as Part Time Water Carrier and permitted to join her duties on 10th January, 2007. There is no illegality in the appointment of respondent No.5 since the petitioner has not complied with all the requirements by supplying the necessary certificates of I.R.D.P., B.P.L. etc. within the time granted vide communication dated 27th December, 2006. 3. Accordingly, in view of the observations and discussions made hereinabove, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. June 20, 2011. (sck).