LU" HIGH COURT OF gHHA$GARH AT BILASPUR ; f yggjt Petiticn g.‘ 357$ @904 » Petitioners 1. Hans Raj Singh. Slo. Shri Amar Jaet Singh. Agad abcut 32 years. Ex-lTl Trade Appientice Ebetrician. Hasdeo Area, South Eastem Coalfields Limited, District Korba (0.6.) Chandrasen Singh, Slo. Shri Tllak Raj Singh. Awd about 32 years, Ex-lTi Trade Apprentice Electrician, Hasdeo Area. South Eastern Coamelds Limited, District Korba (C.G.) 3. Mani Pratap singh, S/o. Shri Anirudh Sinh, Aged about 3O years, Ex-lTl Trade Apprentice Finer. Chirimiri Area. South Eastern Coamelds Limited, Distict Korea (C.G.) ‘ Shivraj Singh, Slo. Late stiri Ramedhar Singh, Aged about 32 ‘years, Ex-lTl Trade Apprentice Fitter, Chirimiri Area, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, District Korea (C.G.)! 5. Prabha Shanltar Singh. Slo. Shrl Ram Gopal Simh. Aged about 32 years, Ex—lTl Trade Apprentice Fitter, Hasdeo Area. south Eastern Coalfields Limited, District Korba (C.G.) 6. Rajendra Singh. slo. Shri Ram Garib Singh, Aged about 35 years. Ex-ITI Trade Apprentice Fitter,” Sohegpur Area, South Eastern Coalhelds Limited. District Shahdol (M.P.) Versus 1. Chairman, Coal India Limited. ’16, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkata (w.B.) , 3. Director (Personnel), South astem Respondents 2. Chairmain-cum—Managing Director, South i Eastem Ooamelds Ltd. SeepatgRoad, Bilaspur (C.G; Coaltileds Ltd., Seepet Road, Biiespur (C.G.) 4. Member Secretary, JBCOI-Vl (Joint Bipartite Committee tor die Coal industry). Coal India Limited, 10, Neteji ubhash Road, Kelkate (W5) 1 S (SB: Hon'bie’Mr’; Justice‘Sntish‘K.VAguihou1) ‘ ‘ Shri Ami! Velma, Advocate for the petitioners. shri Praveen Das, Advocate for the respondents. ORDER (Passed on this 12m day of July, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submiis that the petitioners are similariy situated'to that of the respondents In the matter of Chairman, Central Coattields Ltd. & dhers Vs. Jivendra Prasad Tiwari & others (Civil Appeal No. 1714 of 2007). Learned counsel further submits that the said Civil Appear has been disposed or vide order dated 29‘“ March. 2007, passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Leamed counsel further submits that this ease may also be disposed of in the same terms, to which the teamed counsel appearing for the respondents/S.E.C.L. does not comovert. ln view of the above, the petidon stands disposed of in me same terms. No order as to costs. ’Sd/— Sank}! K. Agm'houi Judge