IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15326 of 2011 Lakhram Singh Versus Motilal Singh & Ors ---------------------------------- 3. 20.09.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. By the impugned order dated 4.5.2011 passed by Sub Judge 8th, Ara in Title Suit No. 622 of 2008 the court below held that the prayer of the petitioner relates regarding the valuation and court fee which requires evidence and, therefore, prayer made by the petitioner shall be considered at the time of hearing of the suit itself. From perusal of the plaint annexed with the application as Annexure 1 it appears that the plaintiff filed only declaratory suit for declaration of title and confirmation of possession over the suit property Considering the above observation of the learned court below, I am not inclined to interfere in the supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of the India. The matter is still open and the petitioner is at liberty to press his grievance before the court below at the time of hearing. Accordingly, the writ application is disposed of. S.S. (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)