C. , ^ 'V° ^. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION N0._OF 2006 PETITIONER : / R.R. Vishwakarma, S/o D.P. Vishwakarma, aged about 51 years, ..^•••'^ i\n?;"r°<.^ ..•Posted as Sub-Engineer, Water ^^c^"^ ?.•••" Resources Sub-Division ...••' ^'fY\.y .'^a'"^i>VU'\-'''f'' ^<<,°^ ^ Manendragarh District Korea (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : ^-1. State of Chhattisgarh, through: the Secretary, Department of Water c' ^^ ^^' .J.0^ Resources, D.K.S. Bhawan, Gv^ v' •^- ^^ Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Under Secretary Department of Water Resources, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). }y 3. The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division Baikunthpur, District Korea (C.-G.) z WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN O^INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI. PROHIBITION ETC. XI-HC-78 3:5?-i||<41d'il,8'Tfly'l6, Rciiuy *1tMWt Sh*1|tb • >A^./.06-W[ 200 31T^?T><ac»> (l°lt^st^ff) sn^T^rf^iw tIW 3H^T stitiich 5OTreR:^(T3TI^T *i''<r<'i<fl-f *ii*)ciT¥teE3'<Ri^i< ^sri^TTsn^r Slib Heard Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, Shri A.S. Kachhawdia, 6.A.I Sy the instmt petition tronsfer order dated 4.7.2i petitioner, who was working as tronsferred to Sub-Division &on4 of the petitioner is that he is 4 taking treatment in the Apollo impugned is aliowed to be execul); the pefitioner from Apoilo Hosp^i Kms and as such, the petitioner ^ that will adverseiy affect 1+ie hea|th Counsel for 1fie petitioner^ 1+ie petitioner may be allowed respondent No.l for bringing thi^ of his transfer order or otherwise directed to decide the represen^ati with iaw, to which learned counsell Having heard iearned coun; to the fccts and circumstances iinion on the merits of case, iftdv. for 1+is petitioner. for the State on advance copy. the petitioner has chaiienged the 0!p6 (Annexure P-1), whereby the Engineer, Manendraigarh, has been }ewada, feedham. The mcin grievance ^uffering from ailment of kidney and H^ospital at Bilaspur and if the orde" ^ed, then the new place of posting of ^ital, Biiaspur wjii be more than 500 till not be able to take treatment and of the petitioner. submits that in The circumstances, ^ mate a detailed representation to fact into his notice for conceliation 'vdfse and in turn, respondent No.l be 'i^ation of the petitioner in accordance for the Stats has no objection. i^ei for the parties and having regard Ipf tiie case, wjtiiout expressing any ^he petitioner is a!lowed to make a P.T.O. XI-HC-78 TS? •^l'Mlirl'i), t?Tfly'IS, i'K-ll'Hy «n*i^itsh*ii<»> ^[ 200 3TT^f craw(y^si^tr) 3ii^T?irlS;TOi B^TSn^Tshiich Ao'-^^ ^ x ^tTRRBfeTsn^r 2_r ^ i:\s> per^iod detaiied representation raising a^l 1+iis petition and o1+ier retevtint within 10 days from today oind 'i^ representation of -riis pstitione" appropriate drders within a receipt of representation. If th^ ttien he should not be relieved With the direction aforesaiU Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.j Certified copy as per ruies. his grievances along with copy of n^edicai documents to respondent No.l turn respondent No.l to decide •rfie in accordance wi1+i tiie law ond pass of 30 days from the date of petitioner is not already relieyed, tillfttie representation is decided. i, the petition stands disposed of. '645/06 olso stands disposed of. +wffi41-< t<i*<cfTfftecA<Ri<-Ai< ^sil^q-sn^r Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.