IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13170 of 2011 Most.Shyam Sundari Devi Wife of Babu Lal Manjhi, Resident of village Maksudpur, P.O. Maksudpur, P.S. Tekari, District Gaya. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The Bihar State Electricity Board, Bihar, Patna through the Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Bihar, Patna. 2. The General Manager cum Chief Engineer, Magadh Electricity Supply Area, Gaya. 3. The Superintending Engineer, Electricity Board, Supply Circle, Gaya (Rural). 4. The Executive Engineer, Electricity Supply Division, Gaya (Rural). ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2. 16.8.2011. Heard Shri Ramesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Namrata Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the respondents/Bihar State Electricity Board. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 30.9.2010 as Selection Grade Messenger from the office of Executive Engineer, Electricity Supply Division, Gaya (Rural), has prayed for directing the respondents to pay the amount of gratuity, leave encashment and some other dues. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has received other retiral dues and he is also getting pension, but the amount under three heads i.e. gratuity, final withdrawal and leave 2 encashment have not been cleared. From perusal of the writ petition, it is evident that no representation has been filed by the petitioner and directly, the petitioner has approached this Court while invoking its writ jurisdiction. After hearing the parties, the writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before respondent no.2/General Manager cum Chief Engineer, Magadh Electricity Supply Area, Gaya within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, the respondent no.2 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no.2 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.2 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within two months from the date of filing 3 of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)