m M HmH SGURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASFUR Petitioners 1) Devi Prasad Mishra, Sin Shri Johan Prasad Mishra, Age abaut 57 years, Asst. Teacher: Govt Pn‘mary $chooa Bagmdi Bmck Saza, Education Qistt. Bemetara, Dist. Burg (CS). 2) Ramjeet $ingh Thakur, SIG. Shn‘ Shankar Sing‘n, Education Distt. Bem$tara, Dist. Durg (CG) 3) Nathu Ram Sahu, Sio‘ Shri Jakia Ram Sam, age about 4? years, Asst. Teacher, Gsvt Primary Schoot, Surujpura, Bbck, Saza: Education Distr- Bemetara, Dist. Durg (CG). 4) Jhadu Séngh Rajput‘ 8/0. Shri Sunder Singh Rajput, Age about 53 years1 Asst Teacher, Govt, Age about 47 years; Asst. Pr§mary Samoa Nkardhé; Gavt. Pr§maw $chccr, Kamhrguda, B€ock Saza, Education Sistt. Bemetara; Drst. Durg (CG). a) Marian Lal Nishad, Sic. Sm Bhanwar Singh’ Age abcut 47 years, Asst. Teacher; Ggvt‘ Primary Schoo!, Ami Brack ~ Saza; Educatian Dis: Bemeéara, Dist Durg (CG, Versus 1) S‘Iate Govf. Gr Chhaitésgarh, through Secretary; Educatien & Tribai Department, DKS. Bhavan, Rarpur (CG). 2) District Education Officer} Distti Bematara (CG). I w,. Resgondents Biock Education Officer, Biock SazalBeria {Writ Petiticn under Articie 226 or the Constitution of SB: Hon’bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihoiri, J. Shri SomkantVerma, counseiforthe petitioners. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dyi Govt Advooaie iorthe Siaie. ORAL GRDER (Passed on 11‘” February, 2008) appearing for the petiiioners as weii as Siam/respondents jointiy submit that the facts and question of iaw invoived in the present writ petition are simiiar to that of in Writ Petition (S) No.1463 of 2006 {Aeman Jain Vs. the State Government or‘ Chnattisgarn and another} which was Learned counsel Wv @ Learned disgosed. 9f we order dated 10‘“ November; 2096 (Annexure P15). counse1 further submits mat i’nis petition may be disposed of in the same terms. 2) in View of fhe above stated submissions made by ieamed counsex’ for the pames, the writ petition is disposed of in the eame terms Le, the petitioners are aiiowed to make represen'tation within a period of two weeks from today to the respondent No.1, raising an his grievances and, in tum, me respondent No.1 shaii decide the said representation in an objective manner within a period of 3O days from the date of receipt such representation, and considering aii {he points raised by the oeiirioners and taking into account the order dared 31-1 if the petitioners stand on r‘ne same footings, as the petit 2000 passed by the. learned Stare Administrative Tribunai in O.A.i\io. 1452 of 1998 and ioners in O.A.No.‘i452 of 19%, then they be also sanctioned the same pay-scaie and seniority. No order as io cos‘re. W Sd/- . Satish K. Agnihotn Judge