THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1780 OF 2011 ORDER: This revision is directed against the order, dated 21-03-2011 in E.A.No.261 of 2010 in E.A.No.244 of 2010 in E.P.No.66 of 2007 in O.S.No.248 of 2003 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Pattikonda, Kurnool District, whereunder and whereby the application filed by the petitioner-J.Dr.No.2 to stop the removal of the compound wall which was constructed by him after removal of PQ as per decree, was dismissed. 2. It is stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition that the petitioner constructed compound wall after the decree for the purpose of preventing stray dogs and pigs to enter into his house and there is no order in the decree not to construct new compound wall to his house. The said petition was dismissed on the ground that the petitioner himself admitted in the Execution Petition that the southern compound wall was kept intact as it is. 3. The question is whether the order of the Executing Court is correct and proper? 4. Even according to the petitioner, he removed the compound wall and paid costs already in the E.P. but he constructed compound wall again so as to prevent stray dogs and pigs to enter into his house. In the Execution Petition, the petitioner himself admitted that the southern compound wall was kept intact as it is. Therefore, he is not supposed to obstruct the Amin in the Execution Proceedings. Hence, the Executing Court can execute the decree. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ---------------------- K.C.BHANU, J. DATED:17-08-2011 Hsd