1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 458 OF 2009 Citicorp Finance (India) Ltd. .... Petitioner vs Aruna Sudhir Gharat & Anr. .... Respondents .... Ms.S.I.Joshi with Mr. Sanjay Anubhavane for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. .... CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 10th August, 2009 P.C.: 1. None present for respondents. All necessary steps were taken to serve them. The Bailiff’s report dated 29th July 2009 is taken on record. The respondents had avoided the service. This Court has already granted ad-interim relief on 19th June 2009. Affidavit of service dated 19th June 2009 filed by the petitioner is taken on record. 2. Considering the scope and purpose of Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short ‘the Act’) and as all ingredients are available in favour of the petitioner to pass order as contemplated, the averments so made has remained uncontraverted, I am inclined to grant prayer clause (a-i) except bracketed portion. 2 2.. This Court vide Order dated 19th June 2009 had already granted ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c) and the same to continue. Having granted prayer clauses (a-i) and (c), nothing survives in this petition. Accordingly, petition is allowed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner for security of its amount. Liberty is also granted to the petitioner to apply if case is made out for police assistance. Petition is allowed accordingly. No costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)