IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 9038 of 2008 Date of decision: 20.01.2011 Harpreet Singh ........ Petitioner Versus Baljinder Kaur .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Sunil Chadha, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. T N Sangha, Sr. Advocate with Mr. J S Lalli, Advocate for the respondent -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing the orders dated 18.08.2007 (Annexure P7) and 18.03.2008 (P9) passed by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Ludhiana in complaint (P3). After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all these pleas as raised herein before the trial Court at the appropriate stage. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. However, the order dated 08.04.2008, granting permission to the petitioner to appear before the trial Court is made absolute in view of the statement made that the petitioner is regularly appearing before the trial Court. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 20.01.2011 mohan