IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Review 94 of 2011. Decided on: 4th August, 2011. Pushpa Devi. ….. Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Ms. Seema Guleria, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 4. : Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): C.M.P.(M) No. 769 of 2011. Allowed. Delay condoned. C. Review 94 of 2011. Petitioner’s apprehension is that the observations contained in the judgment will stand in her way to pursue her dispute with regard to the assessment of income before the appropriate authorities. If that be so, it is clarified that the observations and findings in the judgment shall not stand in the way of the petitioner pursuing her grievance before appropriate authorities with regard to the assessment of income. The review petition stands disposed of as above, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 04, 2010 (bhupender/priti) 2