ilm !.. 3% g 3m 3:4 ,3 Eaya gg §. 3mm . w‘RQg)wzn,g a3” m m Shri Sunil Sahu, counsel for. e petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy G . Mocateior the Statelrespondents No.1, 3.4&6. vrHeard. Leamed counsel for the pe ' ioner states that other similat case O,ANO.314O of 1994 is pending before this Court aner having been ’ registered as W.P.(S.)No.23 of200 and has also been listed today. From perusal of lhe order sheets, it is fou that petitioner‘s claim with regard to payment of salary is also pending ideration in the said case. in this view of the matter, is‘petition is fnally disposed of. The petitioner herein would be at libe to raise his grievance with regard to payment of salary as prayed in thi petition, in the other petition W.P.(S.) No.23 of 2006 at the time of hearing ’ sdl‘ n shr-Nastava Matting“, E0,» judge / /_,_.—,“”* ’ ‘g/ . New