.iv' -^l^- z aisigle fEFORB HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. .05..^. .^•^^ PETITIONERS .\^>M^ ..^^il^ •^o-''" ...•"" ..^ ^ ^•••" RESPONDENTS W.P. (S) No...\^^'.:.U<;......2011 / Ramesh Kumar Verma s/o Ramkhilawan Verma Aged about 32 years Village Tendubhatta P/oNaryanpur Block Nawagarh District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS IState of Chhattisgarh Through - the Secretary Panchyat and welfare Department D.K.S» Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) ^2 Collector Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G) -- 3 Chief Municipal Officer Jila Panchyat Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G) A Chief Municipal Officer Janpad Panchyat Pathariya District Bilaspur (C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE U/A-226 QF THE CONSTITUTIOH OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR MANDAMUS/DIRECTION OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. ^s^^'^^' •^••v^'-^"':;^^.'^-- .1 "s^ ^ww^, ^^\w\^, [®i<ni<4^< —....N;..f:.c..s2...?7..£^.£2^^L *11*1^11 g,^jq, ""—•"••"•—••""•••'•"••—•••"" ""^ 20() 3TI^?T^^! ("i?^^) ^T^T ^RT ^Job WT ^T^?T'SF'RW <S-^n^ ^WKicR <Mfia W^T SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan ^hrivastava, J. 25-05-2011 Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel | Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, respondents No. 1 and 2 on advance c] Heard. Submission of learned counsl though the petitioner has been selec] Shiksha Karmi Grade III, the appoj presumably on the reason that som^ against him. Learned counsel subnj representation has been given to tl] authority under the Chhattisgarh Par^ and Conditions of Ser^ices) Rules, 2C^ any decision on his representation. Learned counsel for the Statl which has been filed by the petition^ considered and decision thereon shalll In view of the submission mad this petition is finally disposed off. Collector-respondent No.2 sha petitioner expeditiously without undue In view ofabove, I.A.No.l, I,A.N^ cr»i€il<ii<fliHw^i ^ Fs'^l <Hn^i< ^3Tf?FT3TT^T for the petitioner. ^:WS!Siiiiiis!i i^:' ^SSS^i^^S^^i. i-iSiissiiiiaiyii iSiiBiliill^itt? SSSSSiSiSS^i^i. Dy. Advocate General for the State/' :J|Jg|g^^||i^ ^WSSSSSSSffi&SS SSSSSSS!Si3SS^ ^^^^M^^I^i^?^^"^^ ^t^^^^-^^^ys.f^^ el .for the' petitioner is that' ted for appointment to the post of |]®^B%||^BBI ntment order is not being issued JiiSSSi; criminal case has been .instituted;:gg|ggg||g||||g| its that aggrieved by the selection, •IS|gg|§|||jgS|%g 'SSSSSiSiSKiS. .e Collector, who is also appellate |^g3|^§ ;hayat Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment 07, but fhe Collector has not takenlggl a submits that the representation r before the Collector shall be duly || be taken. by learned counsel:_for the State, .1 decide the representation of the delay. 5.2 and I.A.No.3 standdisposed off Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^\W^^^ ^un^»<ram^ra—FS/l40—2/2011—1,50,000.