Crl. Misc.No.M 24652 of 2009 #1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc.No.M 24652 of 2009 Date of Decision:-06.12.2010 Raj Kumar. ......Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana. ......Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH. Present:- Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. M.S. Sindhu, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. *** JASWANT SINGH, J(ORAL) Petitioner-complainant(Raj Kumar) has invoked the jurisdiction of this court under Section 482 Cr.PC for directing the respondent State to hand over the investigation of the case FIR No.195 dated 22.6.2009 under Sections 363/366-A Police Station Sadar, Tohana to CBI or to some Independent Agency. It is averred that accused Baljit had an evil eye on the daughter- Poonam Rani of the petitioner, who was less than 17 years of age and was thus kidnapped by the accused Baljit on 22nd of June 2009. Accordingly the petitioner lodged the aforementioned FIR with the proof by way of school certificate (P-2) that the date of birth of Poonam Rani was 15.08.1992 and Crl. Misc.No.M 24652 of 2009 #2# thus a minor. Upon notice the status report has been filed by the State wherein it is stated that during investigation of the aforesaid FIR, both Poonam Rani, daughter of the petitioner and alleged accused Baljit have joined investigation and have submitted the proof of their marriage. Poonam Rani has stated that she has solemnized her marriage with accused Baljit as per her own sweet will. It is further apparent that both Baljit and Poonam Rani had filed Crl. Misc.No.M 16892 of 2009 before this court seeking protection of their life and liberty allegedly threatened at the hands of the family members of Poonam Rani including petitioner-Raj Kumar (father). It is also averred that to determine the age of Poonam Rani Ossification test was also got conducted at General Hospital, Hisar and as per the report, Poonam was declared to be between seventeen years to twenty years of age. Learned State Counsel on instructions from ASI Chavvinder Singh submits that daughter of the petitioner-complainant and accused Baljit after solemnizing their marriage are happily residing together in their matrimonial home and, therefore, after due investigation in the aforesaid case a cancellation report has been prepared and the same shall be submitted in due course of time. In view of such circumstances, in my opinion no further orders are required to be passed in the instant petition. Dismissed. ( JASWANT SINGH ) JUDGE 06th December, 2010 Vinay