THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1962 of 2011 ORDER: This criminal revision case is filed by the petitioner by invoking the provisions under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. seeking to set aside the order dated 06.09.2011 in Crl.M.P.No.3093 of 2011 in C.C.No.689 of 2007 on the file of the II Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate – cum – Mahila Magistrate, Vijayawada. 2. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners herein are nothing to do with the alleged offence. 3. This court perused the records and heard the arguments. 4. Initially, the de facto complainant filed a private complaint under Section 138 of NI Act against one J.R.Sastry. After filing of the said complaint, the petitioners herein went to the de facto complainant and forced him to withdraw the case filed against J.R.Sastry and also they forcibly taken away the cheque books containing the signature of the de facto complainant and other papers and also threatened the de facto complainant with dire consequences. Then the complainant filed case against the petitioners herein in C.C.No.689 of 2007 for the offence punishable under Sections 448, 379 and 506 IPC. Questioning the same, the petitioners filed a discharge petition before the court below and the court below by discussing all the facts in detail, dismissed the said petition. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioners preferred this revision. 5. On perusal of the record, this Court is of the view that there is no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order calling interference of this Court. As rightly held by the learned trial Judge, the allegations made against the petitioners are to be decided after full fledged trial only and there are no merits in this revision and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. In any event, considering the submissions made by the petitioners counsel and also the nature of offence, the presence of the petitioners before the court below is hereby dispensed with except the dates on which the learned Magistrate insists for the same and they shall be properly represented through their counsel. 6. The miscellaneous petitions, if any, filed along with the criminal petition shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO 23rd September 2011, Rns.