IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1194 of 2010 ANIL PANDIT, S/o Bachu Pandit. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 22.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 366A/34 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has been named in the statement of the victim girl recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. only to the effect that he had called her away and the allegation is that the petitioner’s brother, Binod took her to Delhi and she does not allege any sexual assault upon herself by the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 244 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the - 2 - petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)