HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : B!LASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO.1976 OF 2010 P ETITIONER ‘ Mahip Kaushal Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 of the ConStitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Sandeep Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer forthe State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 18‘“ day of October, 2010) 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the impugned order dated 19-1-2010 (Annexure P—1) was passed by the High Power Caste ‘Scrutiny Committee (for short ‘t‘he Committee§ without complying with the mandates of the Supreme Court in Kumari Madhuri Pati/ and another v. Addl. Commissioner, Tribal Development and othersl, reiterated in Director of Triba/ Welfare, Government of AP. V. Laveii Giri and Another? Learned counsel further submits that the mandates of the Supreme Court in the aforesaid decisions has further been explained by this Court in Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others3_ 3. On perusal of the documents, it appears that the Committee has passed the order in a mechanical manner without sticking to the well settled prOcedural requirements, as laid down in the aforesaid decisions. 1 (1 994) 6 SCC 241 2 (1995) 4 SCC 32 3 WP (S) No.3338 of 2007 decided on 19~8—201O I n view of foregoing, the impugned order dated 19—1—2010 (Annexure — P/1) is quashed. The Committee is directed to p roceed in accordance with the decisions of the Supreme Court 7 rendered in Madhuri Patil 1 & Laveti Giri 2 and further expiained by this Court in Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria3 and other connected matters, _ as early as possibie. in the result, the writ petition is allowed to the extent indicated above. L1, Sd/— ~ SATISH K. AGNIHoTRIg ~ Judge "‘ ‘