1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21/10/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.BASHA W.P.(MD) No.6520 of 2011 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 & 2 of 2011 J.Annalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Theni District. 2.The Tahsildar, Aundipatty Taluk, Theni District. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent herein to issue patta for the house site measuring 882 sq.ft., (approximately 2 cents of land) in S.No.1111/2 in Moolakadai Village, Kadamalaikundu, Theni District, purchased by the petitioner under a registered sale deed dated 25.05.2009 vide Doc.727 of 2009 after making necessary sub-division in accordance with the Section 5(3) of the Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act. For petitioner .. Mr.K.Appadurai For respondents .. Mr.S.Chandrasekaran, 1 & 2 Government Advocate ORDER The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for the relief of a direction to the 2nd respondent herein to issue patta for the house site measuring 882 sq.ft., (approximately 2 cents of land) in S.No.1111/2 in Moolakadai Village, Kadamalaikundu, Theni District, purchased by the petitioner under a registered sale deed, dated 25.05.2009, vide Doc.727 of 2009, after making necessary sub-division in accordance with Section 5(3) of the Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act. 2.By mutual consent of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents, the present writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3.Though the petitioner has come forward with a larger prayer, now it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is given to the second respondent to consider and dispose of the representation given by the petitioner, dated 07.02.2011, within a time frame. 4.Heard the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5.In view of the limited prayer now made before this Court by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the representation of the petitioner, dated 07.02.2011, constrained to direct the second respondent herein to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 07.02.2011, by affording opportunity to the petitioner and other relevant parties, and to pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Records) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Theni District. 2.The Tahsildar, Aundipatty Taluk, Theni District. gcg rl/3 c-10.11.2011 W.P.(MD) No.6520 of 2011 21.10.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/