IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34879 of 2011 ============================================= 1. Ramadhar Yadav, s/o- Late Goraju Yadav 2. Chandrawati Devi, w/o- Ramadhar Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ============================================= Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raju Giri For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. P. Mehta, APP ============================================= 2 24-10-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are husband and wife. They are parents of co- accused Dilip Yadav. The complainant/informant is the wife of Dilip Yadav. It is the prosecution case that she was married to Dilip Yadav in the year 2006 whereafter she was tortured on account of non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. It is further alleged that the husband, while working in Delhi, contracted second marriage with another lady. It appears from order dated 6.8.2011 that co-accuseds including the petitioners herein were granted provisional bail for few days enabling them to sort out their differences. On expiry of the aforesaid period, the complainant/informant appeared and narrated that it was impossible for her to stay in matrimonial home, since the husband, while working at Delhi, had already married with another lady. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners being parents cannot be held liable for the acts of his son. It is next contended that younger brother of the husband was, however, granted privilege of anticipatory bail by the Court below. Regard being had to the submissions, this Court is persuaded to release the petitioners on anticipatory bail. In the event of arrest or surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, petitioners abovenamed shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Vijaipur P.S. case No. 55 of 2011 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with further condition that one of the bailors shall be own close family member of the petitioners. PANKAJ KUMAR/- (Kishore K. Mandal, J)