HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY TAKEN UP WRIT PETITION NO.17898 OF 2006 Dated:15.09.2006 Vadde Venkatesh …Petitioner The Station House Officer, Tandur Police Station, Ranga Reddy District and another. …Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY TAKEN UP WRIT PETITION NO.17898 OF 2006 ORAL ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R.Varma) Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader, representing the learned Advocate General, appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is taken up on the basis of a fax message, dated 24.08.2006, sent to this Court, by one Vadde Venkatesh, resident of Mahaboobnagar, complaining that on the night of 23.08.2006, his wife by name Shamalamma and his children by names Laxi, Pushpalatha and Rajkumar, were forcibly taken away by one Srinivas Reddy, Police Constable of Tandoor Police Station, at the instance of his employer by name Kurseed, who was a Stone Crusher owner. 3. Upon notice being issued, the first respondent-the Station House Officer, Tandur Police Station, Ranga Reddy District, filed a counter affidavit stating, inter alia, that the alleged detenus are not required in any of the cases pending on their file and as such, they were never arrested by them. It is further stated that on enquiry, the wife and children of the petitioner were found freely moving and they were made present before the Mandal Revenue Officer, Wanaparthy, who on requisition, recorded the statement of the wife of the petitioner, who stated that she went along with the said Kursheed, Owner of the Stone Crusher Unit, to work at the Crusher unit at Rukmapur, Peddamul Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 4. The statement of the wife of the petitioner recorded by the Mandal Revenue Officer, Wanaparthy, and the photograph of the wife and children of the petitioner, attested by the Mandal Revenue Officer, Wanaparthy, are filed before this Court to show that they are not abducted by the Police at all and apparently there is no truth in the fax message sent to this Court by the petitioner. 5. It appears that there were some disputes between the said Kursheed and the petitioner herein. However, in view of the above facts and circumstances of the case and as the wife of the petitioner herself gave a statement that she is not abducted by the Police Personnel of Tandoor Police Station, we do not propose to proceed further in this matter and accordingly, the writ petition is liable to be closed. 6. In the result, the writ petition is closed, at the stage of admission. _______________ D.S.R.VARMA, J ____________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J 15.09.2006 DR/KRK