1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO: 4255/2007 (Banobi wd/o Abdulla Khan vs. Suresh s/o Sipane and others) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders. .................................................................................................................................................................. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI , J. DATED: 07th February, 2008. *** Heard Mr. R.T.Anthony, learned counsel for petitioner. 2. By way of present petition the petitioner challenges the order dated 10th August 2007 vide which the application filed by the present petitioner for amendment of plaint has been rejected. 3. The suit has been filed in the year 2003. Written statement has also been filed in the year 2003. An earlier application for amendment was made in 2004, that was allowed. Subsequently the issues have been framed and thereafter, the present application for amendment is made in the year 2006. The same is rejected. Hence the present petition. 4. Mr. Anthony, learned counsel for petitioner 2 submits that the learned trial Court ought to have allowed the amendment in the interest of justice. 5. Perusal of the impugned order would reveal that no sufficient cause has been given by the petitioner /plaintiff as to why the amendment which is sought to be incorporated, was not incorporated when an earlier application was filed which was allowed and which was admittedly after the written statement is filed. 6. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference in the impugned order passed by Court below, under extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence Writ Petition is rejected. JUDGE sahare