THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY WRIT PETITION NO:23266 OF 2010 DATED:6.10.2010 Between: 1. The State of A.P., rep., by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, A.P. Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others. .....PETITIONERS AND 1. M. Venkataramanaiah and another. .....RESPONDENTS This Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY WRIT PETITION NO:23266 OF 2010 ORDER: ( Per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) This writ petition is filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 29.9.2006 passed by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, in O.A.No.4602 of 2005. The 1st respondent herein filed the above O.A., contending that though he was selected for the post of Grade II Language Pandit, appointment orders have not been given to him on the ground that Pre Degree Certificate is not requisite qualification as per the Rules. Before the Tribunal, the Counsel for the applicant and the learned Government Pleader stated that the subject matter of the above O.A., is covered by the orders of the Tribunal, dated 30.6.2006 in O.A.No.708 of 2005, O.A.No.1711 of 2005 and O.A.No.2269 of 2005 and therefore, the present O.A., can be disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order dated 30.6.2006. The Tribunal having gone through the orders in O.A.No.708 of 2005 and batch, and having satisfied itself that the subject matter is covered as stated above, disposed of the O.A., in terms of the Orders in O.A.No.708 of 2005 and batch. Now, the present writ petition is filed by the authorities challenging the order in the above O.A., on the ground that the Government in their memo No.19484/Ser.IV/2006, dated 31.8.2007, clarified that only candidates possessing PDC course from Osmania University are entitled for the relief in question and that the 1st respondent-applicant is not possessing the qualification from Osmania University and furthermore, new eligibility qualifications are prescribed for admission to teacher training institutions and the 1st respondent- applicant does not possess the qualifications and there is no provision for relaxation of the Rules of admission and therefore, the 1st respondent-applicant cannot be sent for training in view of lack of qualification. The order impugned herein is a consented order. Apart from that, the present writ petition has been filed nearly after a period of four years from the date of the order impugned herein. In this view of the matter, we feel that the approach of the petitioners before this Court after a lapse of four years, does not appear to be a bonafide one and thereby, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ Justice T.Meena Kumari ___________________ Justice G.V.Seethapathy Date:6.10.2010. nn THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY WRIT PETITION NO:23266 OF 2010 (Order of the Division Bench delivered by Smt.Justice T.Meena Kumari) DATED:6.10.2010