H!GH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH. BILASPUR PETiTIONiR W.P. (U/A 2271 No.1034 of 2010 Risesh Tripathi @ Ritesh Tripathi, aged about 37 years, S/o Late Ambika Prasad Tripathi, R/o Near House of Ashok Rao, Gondpara, Bllaspur, Tahsil and District -Bilaspur(CG) RESPONDENTS Versiis 1 Chhattisgarh State Wakf Board, Through : Chief Executjve Officer, Chhattjsgarh iState Wakf Board, Raipur(CG) ; 2 Sub-Divisional OtTlcer, Bilaspur, Tahsii & Dlstrict Bilaspur (CG) 3 Chief Executive Qfficer, Chhattisgarh State Wakf Board, Raipur(CG) WRIT PETSTION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTSON OF INDIA . •. : AoD@aran.ee: Mr.Manoj Paranjpe, Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. G.SAgarwal, Senior Advocate with Mr. K.R.Nair, Counsel for respondent No.l/Chhattisgarh State Wakf Board, Raipur ORALORDER (11.03.2010) SUNILKUIVEARSINHA.J. Heard. Mr. G.S.Agarwal, learned Senior Counsei appearing on behajf of respondent No.1 submits that in view of the provisions of sub-section 9 of'Section,83 of the Wakf Act, 1995, the writ petition flied under Articte 227 of the Constitution of India would not be maintainable, as the order passed by the Tribunal is a revisable order. r W.P. (UA227J No.1034of2010 ^ ^J !n view ofthe above objection, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this vi/rit petition wlth libertytQfile a revision. Permission granted. Accordingiy, the VVrit Petition Is disposed of, as withdrawn with the aforesaid iiberty granted in favour of the petitioner. The certified copy of the impugned order dated 19.02.2010 shail be retumed to the counsel for the petltioner, after retaining a photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge l!^-