IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45274 of 2009 SUDHIR KUMAR, S/o Kailash Sah. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 17.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 25 (1-B) A and 26 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 06.08.2008 for being in possession of a stolen motor-cycle, one country-made pistol and one live cartridge, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 222 of 2008 (G.R. No. 1887 of 2009) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will - 2 - inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial so as to conclude it within a period of six months. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)