1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.690 OF 2010. SACHIN SURESH TAKLIKAR VS. THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR DIVISION, NAGPUR AND ANOTHER ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. By post. Smt. B. P. Maldhure, APP for State. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 13th DECEMBER 2010. 1. This is a letter petition. 2. Perused the same. 3. Heard learned APP. 4. The petitioner's claim is for release on parole. 5. The ground offered by him is that his younger sister Ku. Rashmi Suresh Taklikar, aged 21 years, is suffering from ill-health. 6. The police report favours the applicant in so far as the aspect of law and order is concerned. However, the ground of sickness i.e. intensity of ailment and its degree warranting release of the petitioner on parole is not supported or 2 complimented by the police report. 7. The divisional Commissioner has found that the police report is adverse. 8. We find that the adversity of the police report may have to be read on the point of ground of parole. Had the finding of the Divisional Commissioner been explicit that the police report is adverse on the point of sickness of petitioner's sister, it would have been apt. However, we do not propose to stick up the technicalities. 9. We are satisfied that the ground of sickness of petitioner's sister as offered by the petitioner before the Divisional Commissioner is not duly supported. In the result, rejection of parole is justified. 10. We therefore, do not propose to grant any indulgence. The petition is, therefore, rejected. 11. Copy of order be supplied to the learned APP who shall forward it to the Superintendent of Central Jail, Nagpur who will interpret the contents to the prisoner. Judge Judge //mule// 3