ORAL ORDER (22 7-201 D) 1. i have heard learned counsel for the pames perused the order Impugned dated 21-7-2008 passed by the 3'“ Additional Drstnct Judge Buaspur In Clvn Suit No.55A/2007, copy of plalnt and Issues. 2. As per the allegation and claim of the plaintiffsirespondents No.1 to 3 herein, the plaintiffs have tiled suit and have prayed relief that the plaintiffs & the defendants be declared as jcint owners of the property and that should be the substantial issue for disposai of the suit, but vide order impugned, the Court below has altered, framed and reconstructed the issues on the basis of allegation of the defendants. in the present case, the defendants have not filed any-counter claim. On due consideration,thepetition is allowed. Order impugned dated 21- 7-2008 passed by the 3'“ Additional District Judge, Bilaspur in Civil Suit No.55Al2007 relating to reframing & reconstruction of issues is set aside. For the just decision of the suit following issue is framed - ‘Whether the plaintiffs 8. the defendants are ioint owners of the property in dispute?” issues No 2 & 3 framed by the Court below are hereby deleted No order as to costs Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge Soma . .