1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 3237 OF 2009 Barku S/o Asaram Gaikwad Versus State of Maharashtra *** Mr. S. K. Barlota, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. D. R. Korde, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED: 22nd SEPTEMBER, 2009. 1. Heard learned counsel for the accused/ applicant. The accused/ applicant, a Grader, allegedly purchased wet cotton or cotton with heavy quantity of moisture, without permissible limits, thereby committed irregularities in purchase and caused huge loss to the federation. Though counsel for the accused/ applicant argues that the role of the accused/ applicant is minimal, being a contractual employee and it was in terms of the standards that he has carried the activities, the fact remains, the accused/ applicant is in custody from 25th August, 2009. Learned A.P.P. is unable to inform as to why 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. further custody of the accused/ applicant is warranted and what progress was made when the accused/ applicant was in fetter. Considering these aspects, the slackness on the part of the investigator also speaks volume. Hence, the order. 2. The accused/ applicant Barku Asaram Gaikwad be released on his furnishing P.R.Bond and surety in the sum of Rs.25,000/- [Rupees twenty-five thousand only], in Crime NO.109 of 2009 registered with Ambad Police Station. 3. After release, the accused/ applicant shall attend the investigator on every Sunday between 10.00 a.m. to 05.00 p.m. till filing of the charge sheet. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:22/09/2009. ans/3237