1 WP8815.10 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8815 OF 2010 Smt.Sanjivani Namdev Mali @ Mrs.Sanjivani Sanjay Patil ... Petitioner v/s State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents Mr.V.S.Deokar for the petitioner. Ms.S.S.Bhende, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.Mandar Limaye for respondent No.3. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR & R. Y. GANOO, JJ. DATED: 10TH AUGUST, 2011 P.C.: 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent of the parties. 2. Heard counsel for both parties. 3. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, it is prayed that two orders passed by the Education 2 WP8815.10 Officer in August, 2010, be quashed and set aside and direct the respondent Nos.2 to 4 to allow the petitioner to work/join the service on her earlier post without any break in service. Identical question has been considered by this Court in the case of Ingole Laxman Shankar v/s State of Maharashtra in Writ Petition No.7746 of 2010 decided on 30.9.2010. Counsel appearing for both parties, in all fairness, submits that the petition be disposed of on the same terms. 4. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned decision and remand the matter back to the Education Officer for de novo consideration and decision in accordance with law, keeping in mind the observations made in the abovesaid decision. 5. Rule made absolute in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs. ( R. Y. GANOO, J. ) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.) 3 WP8815.10