IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20922 of 2009 1. MANTU KUMAR @ MANTU YADAV 2. SIKANDR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 01.07.2009 Heard both sides. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under diverse sections of Indian Penal Code including sections 364, 379 and 307 of Indian Penal Code. As per the F.I.R., altogether 9 persons surrounded the informant and assaulted with danda and lathi. It is the prosecution case that one of them (not the petitioner) forcibly took away mobile, cash and gold rings from the possession of the informant. The further allegation is that they all tried to kidnap. Counsel for the petitioner submits that in fact the informant himself was involved in demanding rangdari from the cattle traders. The petitioner had gone to save the trader . A case for the said occurrence was lodged by way of complaint case no. 335 of 2009. It is further contended that the petitioner does not carry any criminal antecedents. In this connection, counsel for the petitioner draws attention of the Court to the averments made in paragraph 15 of the bail application. It appears that the petitioner is in custody since 30.3.2009. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner abovenamed be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial 2 Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Madhepura (Bharrahi) P.S. case no. 130 of 2009 subject to the condition that one of the bailers will be own/close family member of the petitioner. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )