f ^tSfe, 1 1 fe' ' i'9 J ??>—-ii>'j!/ . •"ky^y^ • ^iX^ '^-" '3^ •<<i<ii<n<<, »ialw«o,RKii^iy •niCTi a>w» 200 ^lA<(l MSI* ('yf^S?) diAaiM Ww> <ni w afw^ C«1W<«I^tloit^fl W.P.fs)? PETITIONER Maaharaa Lal Faudey, S/o Late Shri Laxinipras^d Pandey, Aged about 65 years, Master, R/oViIIage& Post Janve, [uda, District-Janjgir-Chaiapa (CG) 'Retired Tehsil-Bal; Helid RESPONDEHTS 1. State of Deparbnenl Raipur (CG) 2. Director; j)eparfment of School Education, Raipiu- (CG)| lucation Ofilcer, District Janjgir- S.B Hoa'ble Shri Dhia-eadra Ml; 19.13.2008 Mr. Satyendra Sahu.learae Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, The petition.er retired on Headmaster ia Govt. Boys' Champa. He was entifled for 2nf years of service, however, fh^; upgradation to fhe petitioner retiijf his pension on ffae basis oflast di^ »i<ifa^Ni*iyif'^;ls*<^<(<li*£i< ^" ' ^'ifeT^ttgifaffl^^^ v^ o. 7082/2008 .us Chliattisgarh, fbrough Secretary, of School Education, DKS Bhawan, 3. District Ei] Champa (C^ 4. Joiat Dire(ltor,.Treasuiy,Accouiit& Pensioii, ^Bilaspur (Cp) 5. Block Educ^tion Of&cer, Baluda, District-Janjgir- Champa(C(( Writ Petitioa under Article ^) -) 26 of the Coustitution of ladia hra. J leahied counsel for the petitioner. Paiiel Lawyer for fhe State. p0th Apnl, 2003 while workmg as Pri^nary School, NaUa, Distt. Janjgir- upgradation after coiapletiou of 24 respoudeuts wifhout giving 2nd id him on 30th April, 2003 aad fixefl awn pay. . ^1^=61^ ^q^["IR4i| U^TT^ff^—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000. ^fse-p^^ ^^^'"•fc, ;y '-^- '•'.• ?!°^'<<1<11<"1<1, ®Tllyi<S,I»t<11^)lj,< IINtW (B*liq*~"~~"~'"m'~""~""~"~'~^"""^^200 <ti<t<i iiw l^n'pis^^ aiB^rtBt'^Fih? Wff<WH^wiib*<n* ttnw< tifta ^I^B' 1...1:'..1 2-:: pet|tii wafe redresbal Leamed couiisel for fhe fhe State Govt, fhe petitioner completion of24 years ofservice. |fhis petition at'tteis stage, howev^ |fi-esh repreisentafion for respoudents -No.3 & 4, who may] ^*K.,».».: , . representation arid-decide the Sam| Mr. fffska] Shrivastava, submits that ia case the petit4>] redressal of his grievauce before shall be processed and decided In view of above subiiussioils the iastant petition is disposed file a fresh representation befor| redressal of his grievances representation beiiig inade, fhe r4s aad decide the same expeditiously] *lasl^i[«jlit|*tn¥^T (6*<l <pq<^i< '' s ^r<tl(g*l <»t|^ " ^ |tioner subinits that as per poUcy of entitled fpr 2nd upgradation after He subiuits fhat he is not pressiug [r, he niay be permitted to inake a of his grievaace before the be ftufher directed to prdcess his within a speci&ed period. PL appeacuig for fhe State [>ner fQes fresh representafion for respondertts No. 3 & 4, fhe saine ^editiously in accondance with law. of leanied couasel for the parties, a direction to the petitioner to ^ the respondents No. 3 & 4 for ia fhis petition. On such [spondents No, 3 & 4 shatl process tm accordance wittrlavv. —- Idamed tte ex^editiously oflwith rafeed "a ge Itity^l^ ^^ly ^Utl^il <M:-i?^'!M—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000.