IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS MONDAY, THE 29TH MARCH 2010 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 9410 of 2010(A) ------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. M.D.JOSEPH, AGED 67, S/O.DEVASIA, MATTATIL HOUSE, MARANGATTUPILLI P.O., KURICHITHANAM VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. KUTTIYAMMA JOSEPH, AGED 65, W/O.M.D.JOSEPH, MATTATIL HOUSE,MARANGATTUPILLI P.O KURICHITHANAM VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.BABY THOMAS. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MARANGATTUPILLY POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAMAPURAM POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, KOTTAYAM. 4. SAJI JOSEPH, S/O.M.D.JOSEPH, MATTATHIL HOUSE, MARANGATTUPILLY P.O., KURICHITHANAM VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 5. BENO JOSEPH, S/O.M.D.JOSEPH, MATTATHIL HOUSE, MARANGATTUPILLY P.O., KURICHITHANAM VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR. T.K. VIPINDAS, R4 & R5 BY ADV. MR.P.C.HARIDAS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/03/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.9410/2010-A: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE BUILDING TAX RECEIPT DTD. 24/12/2007 BEFORE THE MARANGATTUPILLY GRAMA PANCHAYATH. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE R.1. DTD. 14/07/2009. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE R.2. DTD. 23/02/2010. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE RESPONDENTS 1 AND 3 DTD. 02/03/2010. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. -------------------------------------------------- W.P(C). NO. 9410 OF 2010 A --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th March, 2010 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. Petitioners are the parents of respondents 4 and 5. They have approached this Court seeking direction to render police protection. 2. We heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for respondents 4 and 5 as also the learned Government Pleader. Learned counsel for respondents 4 and 5 would submit that a Counter Affidavit is filed in the matter. He would further submit that respondents 4 and 5 have no intention to threaten the petitioners or cause any danger to the life of the petitioners. We record the said submission and dispose of the Writ Petition directing respondents 1 to 3 to render adequate protection for the life of the petitioners as and when required as against any threat from respondents 4 and 5. We make it clear that the civil court before which Suits are WPC.9410/2010A 2 pending between the parties will decide the issue pending before it untrammeled by anything contained in this Judgment. We further make it clear that we have not gone into the allegations by the petitioners against respondents 4 and 5. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/= M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge