(^ ^ [y^ INTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fSl N0. 3^7^ OF 2003 PETITIONER ^' ^?-- ^s^' ....--•:^^ .\'\~'' . --.'-1, "- .;^' Ramsaran Sharma, S/0 late Shr! Narmada Prasad Sharma, aged about 49 years, Occupation-Service, posted as Incharge Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Tumgaon, District- Mahasamund, (C.G.), VERSUS .f^'' 'u\-\.-' ^'" RESPONDENTS -^ (1) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Nagriya Prashashan and Vikas Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) »»•" (2) Deputy Secretary, Chhattisgarh State, Nagriya Prashashan and Vikas Department, Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) ^' . (3) Commissioner, Nagriya Prashashan and Vikas Sanchnataya, Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) (4) Shri Subhash Singh Thakur, Assistant Jansampark OfRcer, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, District- Durg, (C.G.) WRIT PETJTIQNJI/A_22SJ3F THE CONSITITUTION OF INDIA "<< ; '>L **^ ^.•!~ "?•-"•!"!?y. ^h111*^^ / •(:s^" ^.^.-^^^, 'is. SES' ^®1 ^,/ [Hon. Mr, Justsce Pritinker Diwaker) VERSUS Ramsaran Sharma State or' Chhattisgarh and others. Shri Avvadh Tripathi, counsel for the petitloner Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Advocate forthe With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 29.6.2009 (Annexure P-1} passed by respondent No.2 by vi?hich the respondent No. 4 has been transferred in place of the peSitioner. Counsel for the petitioner submits that though there is no order in respect of the petitioner but the consequence of the order impugned shall automatically amount to shifting of the petifioner as respondent No. 4 has been posted in his place. He however submits that the petitloner may be permitted to Vv'ithdraw this petition with liberty to make representation. He a!so seeks a direction to the authorities concerned to decide the said representation expeditiously. To Shis prayer of the petitioner, counse! for the respondents/State has no objection. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn wflth iiberty as aforesaid. If the petifioner makes a representafion within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt- of copy or this order, the same would be decided by the authorifies concerned within a further period of three weeks from the dste of its receipt strictly in accordance with law. Til! then the order impugned shall not be given effect to. —~ Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar ^ Judge