IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11080 of 2010 NARENDRA KUMAR ANCHAILIA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 7/ 08.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Cheque No. 259486 for Rs. 90,000/- and Cheque No. 259487 for Rs.50,000/- are bounced. That has been made ground for accusation under Sections 406 and 420 of the I.P.C. which according to the learned counsel for the petitioner is not applicable. Moreover, reference is made terms “h” of agreement dated 04.10.1997 in which cheques in question along with others was to return to the petitioner. Annexure- 4 is a paper about declaration of no liability on the petitioner for which according to the petitioner, it is said that title suit is also filed in Kolkata. In my view, final relief can be awarded by Civil Court. Apparently if cheques are bounced, the liability which can be fixed is bailable one, but petitioner is apprehending his arrest for the offence under Sections 406 and 420 of the I.P.C. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. Considering the facts and circumstances of 2 the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 103 of 2005, G.R. No. 1224 of 2005 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)