IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9310 of 2010 KRISHNA YADAV Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 20.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that differences were otherwise for non-execution of sale deed in lieu of consideration money taken by the informant’s father and now, parties have resolved their differences though allegation is of snatching of Rs. 1385/- on refusal of rangdari. Taking that into consideration, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 136 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)