IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. ORDER S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.3101/2006 Ramesh Saini Vs. Addl. District Judge & Ors. 19.5.2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Shri Umesh Kumar Sharma, for the appellant. Shri Raj Kumar Sharma, for the respondent. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the impugned order dated 03.8.2006. By the impugned order an application filed by the plaintiff appellant under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. Along with suit for specific performance of the agreement was dismissed by the learned trial court. The appeal having been heard for admission on 15.9.2006, this court passed an interim order directing the parties to maintain status quo as it exist then, during the pendency of the suit. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that by status quo all that the appellant prayed for was that the property may not be transferred during the pendency of the suit. The learned counsel for the respondent on th other hand has submitted that the respondent has no intention of selling the property. Though the respondent disputes the agreement itself and also the fact of having received any consideration as held by the learned court below. In the facts and circumstances therefore without expressing any opinion of the merits, since the respondent has submitted that he has no intension to transfer the land, the interim order passed by this court on 15.9.2006 is made absolute to last during the pendency of the suit. This misc. appeal is accordingly disposed of. (DALIP SINGH),J. Ramchandrkhatri,PS