IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Rev. No.: 73 of 2010. Decided on: 09.11.2010. __________________________________________________________ Devi Ram Chauhan and another. … Petitioners. Versus Director of Technical Education and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners : Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): There is no error apparent on the face of record. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to move appropriate petition for the redressal of their subsisting grievance, if any, in accordance with law. The limitation shall not come in their way due to the pendency of CWP (T) No.5756 of 2008 and the review petition No.73 of 2010. 2. Consequently, with the above observations, the present petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 09, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?