IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INDIAN GUARDIANSHIP PETITION NO.152 OF 2005 Dinesh Krishnan and his wife Pallavi Narain. ....Petitioners. Vs. Asha Sadan, Rescue Home, Umerkhadi, Mumbai 400 009. ....Respondents. Ms. Lalita Jaya Raj for the Petitioners. Ms. Pranjali Ahire, Representative of ICSW present. Ms.S.M.Dandekar, AGP. present. CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR,J. DATED : OCTOBER 26, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The petitioners herein are adopting two minor children (twins), for which reason, ordinary rule to require them to invest three times of their monthly income, in my opinion, deserves to be relaxed. In other words, in the peculiar facts of the present case, the petitioners are allowed to make only one set of investment namely, Rs.1,50,000/-( Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand only). I am informed that the petitioners have already invested Rs.50,000/- for the respective child. In that case, they will have to deposit further sum of Rs.25,000/- for the respective child in ICICI Small Kids Scheme. As all other formalities are complied with, representative of ICSW has no objection to pass order in terms of Judges Order. In the interest of minor, I think it proper to allow the petition in terms of Judges order. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)