^r-]^2— IN TEIE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATT!SGARH 4-<- •5-2.3 /: K.P. Rathor^, S/o. Dayaram Rathore, Aged about 50 years, ri^[& ^^•^- 'o. Rathore ,^\ \)^> f,^o<V'>;y ;.. District Jaajgu'-Champa $CG) <^^---"" a\.\---"' ,1(*"' 1} StateofChliattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) ,-t-^-^ .--••*^v-'.v t0 J. G. »<> 2] Engineer- Water Resources Department, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 31 Sub Divisi •? No.4, Sakti, District Champa (CG) 4] Chief E^cecutive Officer, District Janjgu-Champa (CGj yat and Graroia Vikas >.K.S, ^. 61 Vibhag, Raipur, Distt Raipur (CG) ;>* WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTSON OF SN0IA XI-HC-22 SII^TTT f?:IW3D^T sniiti nf?(T ssg'^Tpir?ra',^fteTre, Riciiuy *<IHl''[T9lHI<<) 3ll^?l <<a<sh ^P^°)lob V^ 200 fe% 3n^?r CTarw HfttT 29.8.2006 colunsel Parfe df Mr*. Manoj Paranjpe, Mr, Vinay Pandey, advance copy. Heord. The petitioner's case Water Resources Departn^ent, (Annexure P-1) he was ssr|T Panchayat & Kural bevelopm^i petitioner joined in the &epa| Later on, other Engineers chailen9sd ths said order quashed by this Court. r-epresentation to the bepar^-ment statin9 therein that he does Panchayat & Rural decided. Having heard learned the petition, •rtie petitioner Panchayat & Rural t>eyelopffle^it and thereafter, that order filedthe petition. That the Deoutv Advocate Senendl for the petitioner. ^l Lawyer for 1+ie State/respondents, on t>eve!opn|ent ordelr <»ii<<Tci<fl-< *iiHciT^'feiA<Ri+<;i< ^ari^Tsn^r is that he was workin9 as Sub Engineer, i^ent, and vide order dated 17-Jfc2006 on dsputation To -Hie Department of n|ent and in compliance of that order, the •tment of Pouichayat & Rural Devebpment. o|f the Water Resources Department had cjated 17-^-2006 and the same has been Thereafter, the petitioner made a of Panchayat & Rural Development (lot want to continue in the Department of f, but his representation is not being ^ounsel for the parties and having perused [las already joined in the &epartment of in pursuance of order dated 17-3.-2006 been quashed qus the petitioners who wcs quashed on 1+ie submission made by oh behaif of the Sto+e 'H^at •Hie Stotte Has ('fl^^)^) \ XI-HC-22 sn^r^r R-fi+sn^T sbHlti (Tfsa' sbHlti G -(-" ftoshon/ •mwi shtiitti 3^ •<<i'i<ici'y, ^Tny'ld, (»i<'iiyy 3TT^?T4ach ••••••^200 ^ [cl'b«d sn^rs^nwHfgg' —?-. •the has framed a new scheme ftesources Department under (PM6SY) scheme. Therefore. in the joined in the Department oj< respondents while passing respect of the Engineers of V consider the case of the petil^i Resources Department, there| along wi-rfi the other Engine^r petitioner. Till then, the petil^ioner Panchayat & Rural bevelopm^i joined. With the directions afoitesaid In view of this order, Ij Parties are entitted for °hi<iF<i<fl-i 4iiciTfftei^t<R]«i< ^sif^iran^T for sending the Engineers of Water the Pradhoui Mantri 6ram Sadak Yojana circi^mstances, as the petitioner hofi alrecdy )f Panchcyct <& Rural Devetopment, the order regarding PM6SY scheme in |Vater Resources Department should also |ioner, as the petitioner belongs to Water Fore, they should pass cypropriate order srs in respect of 1+ie services of the petil^ioner shall continue in the Department of im^nt on the post where he has already tesaid, the petition stands disposed of. ^. No.8159/06 stands disposed of. ^ertified copy of this ordf 3° L.C.S Ktlge (-ft^y^) c