1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11026 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4885 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Mr. D.P. Palodkar, Advocate for Applicant CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 3rd July, 2009 PER COURT : 1. This is an application for adding the petitioners as party respondent. Mr. Palodkar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners have been parties throughout the proceedings before the authorities. Inspite of that, the applicants have not been arrayed as party respondents. 2. The application is vehemently opposed by Shri Gangapurwala, on the ground that the present applicant has no locus to defend the order issued by the Chief Officer, Municipal Council. He, therefore, submits that the applicant is neither necessary nor proper parties. 3. From the perusal of the record it is clear that the 2 present applicants have been parties to the proceedings throughout. In that view of the matter, I find that the present of the applicants would be necessary, if not as a necessary party but at least as a proper party. In that view of the matter, the application is allowed. 4. The applicants to take steps within two weeks from today. [B.R. GAVAI , J.] grt/-