IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42927 of 2008 1. RAMOTAR PRASAD YADUKA @ RAMOTAR YADUKA, S/o late Sagarmal Yaduka 2. Sushil Kumar Yaduka @ Sushil Yaduka 3. Arun Kumar Yaduka @ Arun Yaduka 4. Anil Kumar Yaduka @ Anil Yaduka All are R/o Saharsa Ward No. 3/16, P.S. Saharsa, Dist. Saharsa Versus STATE OF BIHAR & Anr. ----------- 2/ 05.12.2008 Heard. It is surprising that instead of filing suits for specific performance for sale of tangible immovable property, dishonest litigations are taking recourse to filing of complaint petitions alleging cheating by the person, who has refused to perform and discharge his part of obligation under the contract. It is even more surprising that the Magistrate is taking cognizance on such complaints. It is one of such cases. In the circumstances, the application for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. Let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saharsa in connection with Complaint Case No. 1173C of 2005 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. 2 P.C. S.B.P. (Barin Ghosh, J.)