C.R.No.2676 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.2676 of 2009 Date of Decision : 20.8.2009 Preeto Devi ...Petitioner Versus Bhagwan Dass and Another ...Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Vipul Dharmani, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The plaintiff is in revision aggrieved against the order passed by the Courts below, whereby the plaintiff has been directed to place on record the receipt for payment of Batai to the defendants within a period of one month, failing which the injunction granted in favour of the plaintiff was ordered to be vacated. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the respondents are not accepting the cash equivalent of batai, which was offered to the defendants from the date of purchase of land by the said defendants, but the defendants are claiming the arrears of Batai for the period even prior to purchase of land by the said defendants. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to move an C.R.No.2676 of 2009 2 application before the learned trial Court for deposit of cash equivalent of Batai and from such date as is considered appropriate. As and when such application is moved, the trial Court shall decide the same in accordance with law. The amount of Rs.10,000/- deposited by the petitioner in pursuance of the order passed by this Court on 22.5.2009 shall be remitted to the trial Court for its disbursement in accordance with law. With the said observations, the petition is disposed of. 20.8.2009 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE