1 SB Civil Writ Petition No.752/2009 Brij Kishor. vs. Smt. Sarika Maloo & Ors. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.752/2009 Brij Kishor. vs. Smt. Sarika Maloo and others. Date : 6.2.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.SK Gupta, for the petitioner. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. According to learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff, in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court delivered in the case of Kailash vs. Nanhku and others reported in 2005 AIR SCW 2346, the trial court should not have permitted the defendants to file written statement after expiry of period of limitation. I considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and as per the learned counsel for the petitioner, there was delay of either 6 or 20 days in filing the written statement. 2 SB Civil Writ Petition No.752/2009 Brij Kishor. vs. Smt. Sarika Maloo & Ors. I do not find any just reason to exercise jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in such a situation. Consequently, this writ petition is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya