IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 29TH MAY 2008 / 8TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 8169 of 2008(S) ------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN IA 5059/2007 IN O.P.373/2007 OF FAMILY COURT,THRISSUR .................... PETITIONER: ------------------- DR.T.L.SUNIL KUMAR, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O.THANDAYANGATTIL LAKSHMANAN, LALITH BHAVAN, AYYANTHOLE VILLAGE DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI. RAJIT, ADV. SRI. RANJIT BABU. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. KAVITHA, AGED 31 YEARS, D/O.U.R.SREENIVASAN, UPPUKUNNATH RAMANILAYAM HOUSE, CHOWALLUR VILLAGE, DESOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK. 2. U.R.SREENIVASAN, UPPUKUNNATH RAMANILAYAM HOUSE, CHOWALLUR VILLAGE, DESOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK. 3. PUSHPARJINI SREENIVASAN, W/O.U.R.SREENIVASAN, UPPUKUNNATH RAMANILAYAM HOUSE, CHOWALLUR VILLAGE, DESOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.CHANDRA MOHAN - R1 & R2. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/05/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.8169/2008-S: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 14/06/2007 IN I.A. 1540/2007 IN O.P.373/2007 OF THE FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE APPLICATION I.A.5059/2007 IN O.P. 373/2007 FILED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DTD. 14/01/2008 IN W.P.(C). NO. 401/2008. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR ADVANCING THE CASE IN O.P. 373/2007. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE COUNTER FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS TO EXT.P.4 APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR ADVANCING THE CASE IN O.P. 373/2007. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 13/02/2008 IN I.A. NO. 5059/2007 IN O.P. 373/2007 OF THE FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// prv. J.B.Koshy & P.N.Ravindran, JJ. ===================== W.P(C).No.8169 of 2008 ===================== Dated this the 29th day of May, 2008. JUDGMENT Koshy,J. As directed in the interim order, the child was entrusted with the father during the vacation. As per the order the child should be entrusted back to the respondents on the eve of the reopening day of the school. That should be complied with. This appeal is filed against the interim order. In the circumstances, the Family Court is directed to dispose of the main case as expeditiously as possible, in any event, within six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. J.B.Koshy, Judge. P.N.Ravindran, Judge. ess 29/5