{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8380 OF 2006 Maya Kisanrao Wanjare R/o Yelambghat Tq. & Dist. Beed. PETITIONER VERSUS 01- The State of Maharashtra 02- The Secretary Shri Narayan Gad Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Beed. 03- The Head Master Balwantrao Kadam Madhyamik Higher Secondary Vidyalaya Yelembghat Tq. & Dist. Beed. 04- The Education Officer, [Secondary] Zilla Parishad Beed. 05- Sudhir Sheshrao Payal R/o Balwantrao Kadam Secondary Vidyalaya, Yelembghat Tq. Beed. RESPONDENTS. *** Shri R.K.Jadhavar, advocate for the petitioner Shri N.B.Patil, AGP for the State. Shri B.A.Dhengle, advocate for respondent No.2 & 3. Shri N.G.Kale, advocate for respondent no.5 *** {2} Coram : NARESH H. PATIL,J. N.D.DESHPANDE, J. Date: 11th June 2009. P.C.: 01- Heard. The petitioner was working as peon. He has completed his graduation and therefore he claims appointment as clerk on promotional basis. The management issued an advertisement to fill up the post of clerk. The petitioner claimed that he applied for the post of clerk, but he was not selected. The management disputed this position. The management submitted that a suitable person was appointed as clerk who was granted approval. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Education Officer, in the intervening period had not granted regular approval as the petitioner was pending. 02- Appointment to the post of clerk was made few years back. In the facts of the case, the issues cannot be reopened now. In future, any advertisement is issued, the petitioner is entitled to apply and file application for consideration of his case in accordance with law for appointment on a higher post. No interference is required under extra ordinary jurisdiction. We do not find any glaring error. The petition is dismissed. [N.D.DESHPANDE] [NARESH H.PATIL] JUDGE JUDGE. /mda/0609/wp8380.06