lrfc \"Si ^y -«£!»»" 's^ 311^1 qnftwp ^; an^i *iii«(i •'y ?sr r<)i*iicpT, ®Ti1yi(o,fsidiyy *ii*iCTi tn*<i<n" """ "^^200<3 SII^I 'VW ('jclt^«l<i«T) swiw^iteisn^i PETITIONBR Shyata ^al Verma, aged about 55 years, Son of Latc Shiji Gaaga Prasad, Rcsidcnt of IEM School, Jhagrakfiaad, District Korea (CG) 'yersus RBSPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. Sch<}oL Wnt Petitipn under Article S.B Hoa'ble Shri Dliirendra Ifcishra, J. 24-10-2008 Siat. Raajaiia Jaiswal, co| Shri MPS Bhatia, Dy GA ^ Teacher ia IEM Primarv School ehi^il^-ift'i tTm?ft ^ffi^ <F*I^R iTsifiinan^i ;G, Through Secretary, Departineat of iducation, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, G) .) State of School $< Kaipur (C]G) The Disttict Education Officer, Korea, District Korea (C(p) IEM Educatioj (CG) The DN Pension H ^ol, Through Headmaster, Singhi CoUieiy ^ Society, Jhagrakhand, Distt. Korea ;ctor, Directorate, Public Institution., iada, Raipur (CG) 26/227 ofthe Constitution ofladia Luisel fbr tlie petitioner. br fhe State. By this petition, the p^titioner who is working as Assistaut the benefits of 5th Pay Conuiiisjsion at par with their counter parts in. the Govenuaent Schools. The with effect fi'om. 1.1.1996 in [ Jhagrakhaad, Distt. Korea is c] !5th Pay Commission was to be graated accordaace with the Madhva Pradesh Revision ofPay Rules, 1998. This Court bv tlie iudgmtut and order dated 6.2.2007 in. case of Smt. A. Lall Vs. State of Chl^attlsgevh said other connected matters ?r^T H?^1^T, O^-^i^itc) —FS/397—3/2008—40,000. ^^•" f an^tqii Ri-iitfi "^ 3Tlt?[ »Hiq» ^/ •'S6. iiicir a>*ii<*> 7°EF •*fl'4K'l<1, ®Tll'M'i|a,fadl'H^ . t^ WI.200 '& sn^i '^a^? (•jql^iyt) wnwgfci sii^i 2- iW.P.No.4108ofaOOSf held aided schools are eiititled to fht Pay Coinnussion. After the de| ffled this petitionon 24.9.2008 -graiiteij.to his counter parts. .;' Leanied counsel for thf petitBMier^ttas uiade represental respondent authorities, howevej lu' view of fhe fact fhat pending consideration befoi respondent aufhorities are di dated 2.8.2008 (Annexure P/2)| accordance wifh law. on its ovj and order dated 6.2.2007 pass^d LaU Vs. State of Chliatdsgarh ahd The petition. is accordinglti qii<fi<n4ti 'Rrocff ^f "fe^ <^i<$i< ^affiin 3n^i fttat fhe teachers wbrkiag iu eovemiuent benefit of recommendations of the 5th :ision of fhis Court, fhe petitioner has ;laimme for the same reUef as has been petitioner fdrther subinits tiiat the iltion on 2.8.2008 (AnnexuTeP/2) to fhe 1-, it was not coasidered at all. |fhe representatLon of the petitioner is tlie authoriti.es Goncerued, the Irected to consider lus reDresentation Ipending before fhe respondent No. 1, in ^n nierits, in. the light of fhe judgiaent by fhis Coiirt ia the laatter of Sint. A. other connected niatters (supra). disposed of. No order as to costs. '•s^... ::.Sd/-',.:,:l; Dhu'eridraMfelira -•:%y':judge: ;.'1.:. ^t?ij5i"IR^, —FS/197—3/2008 —40,000.