:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2396 OF 2008 Mrs. Archana Paras Patil (Jain) ..Petitioner Vs. Mr. Paras Madhukar Patil (Jain) ..Respondent Mr. Sachin S. Punde for petitioner. Mr. Amit Shete i/by Mr. P.D. Pise for respondent. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. Date : April 24, 2008. Date : April 24, 2008. Date : April 24, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Punde the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner-wife is aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division on 8/10/2007 thereby rejecting the application filed under Order XXXIX Rule 2-A of C.P.C. 2. Admittedly, the Special Civil Suit No. 41 of 2004 has been filed under Section 18 of the Hindu Maintenance and Adoption Act and the application at Exh.6 therein which has been allowed by :2: the learned Judge on 15/10/2004 was not filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. and, therefore no fault could be found with the impugned order. 3. The petition is, therefore, rejected. 4. At the same time, it is noted that the learned counsel for both the parties are unanimous on settling the present matrimonial disputes by negotiations and they agreed that the spouses and their parents/elder members of the families will meet within two weeks from today and try to sort out the present separation between the spouses so as to re-unit them or annulled the marriage by consent. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)