IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 16 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- FAZALMIYA AHMEDMIYA MALEK Versus AMINMIYA HASANMIYA MALEK -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Civil Revision Application No. 16 of 1999 MR NS DESAI for Petitioner No. 1-4 MR MAKHDUM Y MALEK for Respondent No. 1 MS BANNA S DUTTA for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR Date of decision: 03/03/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr.Dharmesh Shah appearing on behalf of Mr.N.S.Desai, learned advocate for the petitioners state that since this Civil Revision Application is filed against an interlocutory order, the same is not maintainable in view of the amendment in Section 115 of C.P.C., therefore, he wants to withdraw this Revision Application in order to file a Special Civil Application. 2) Permission as prayed for is granted. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Application is disposed of as having been withdrawn. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. (P.B.Majmudar,J.) /malek