IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.669 of 2009 Parwez Alam, Son of Amirain Alam, Resident of Village-Paikoli Baddo, Police Station- Phulwaria, District- Gopalganj ------ Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The District Magistrate, Gopalganj. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj. 4. The Officer In-charge, Thawe Police Station, District-Gopalganj 5. Mohammad Sabir Hussain, son of Late Amirul Haque 6. Guddu, Son of Mohammad Sabir Hussain 7. Laddan, Son of Mohammad Sabir Hussain. 8. Arjoo Naz, Wife of Parwez Alam & Daughter of Mohammad Sabir Hussain, Sl.No. 5 to 8 are residents of Village- Bedi Total, Police Station-Thawe, District-Gopalganj ----- Respondents. ------------ 7. 21.1.2010 Heard Mr. Najmul Hoda for the petitioner, Mr. A. Amanullah, learned Standing Counsel No.17 for respondent nos. 1 to 4, and Mr. Ansul for respondent no. 5, 6 and 8. The petitioner claims to have married respondent no.8 and seeks a direction to respondent no. 5 to 7 to allow respondent no.8 to go to her matrimonial home. Respondent no.5 is the father of respondent no.8. Respondent nos. 1 to 4, and respondent nos. 8, have filed their counter affidavits. In pursuance of our order dated 4.12.2009, the petitioner, respondent nos.5 and 8 are personally present in court. We have interviewed the petitioner, respondent no.5 and respondent no.8 separately in camera. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner claims to have married respondent no.8 on 17.6.2008, as per their traditional rites. The petitioner claims that Annexure-1 to 2 the writ petition is a photo copy of the certificate of Nikah. It is further stated that Nikah took place on 17.6.2008, but the marriage could not be consummated because Rukshadi has not taken place. It appears to us that, in view of the materials on record and our interview with the parties, we should not proceed any further in the matter in exercise of writ jurisdiction. It goes without saying that it will be open to the parties to approach the court(s) of competent jurisdiction for appropriate relief in accordance with law. It is expected that the elders, well-wishers, and family friends of the two families, to make sincere efforts to bring about compromise between the parties. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar ,J. ) (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)