IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No. 10172 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : SEPTEMBER 22, 2009 AMARJIT SINGH DULLET ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Vikas Kuthiala, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior DAG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondent-State has pointed out that the case entitled Prithpal Singh v. The State of Punjab and others, CWP No.1960 of 2008, has been decided on 9.9.2009. The respondents have been directed to make promotion to the posts of Chief Engineers on substantive basis within a period of 2 months of according consideration to all the eligible Superintending Engineers in accordance with law and the current duty charge shall stand determined on expiry of two months or Civil Writ Petition No. 10172 of 2009 2 when the regular promotees occupy the promotional post whichever is earlier. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the claim of the petitioner in this petition is identical to the one in Prithpal Singh's case (supra). Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that in view of the judgment rendered in Prithpal Singh's case (supra), the cause of action does not survive. Disposed of as infructuous on the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner. September 22, 2009 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?