1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.29/2008 (Uttam Teji Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : February 12, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Nandkishore, for the petitioner. Mr.J.P.S. Choudhary, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the police investigation diary. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no overt act has been assigned to the present petitioner and the similarly situated co-accused Kailash alias Bhutta and Madan Lal Vaishnav have been granted bail and the case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable from that of co-accused. This fact has not been disputed by the learned Public Prosecutor. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that similarly situated co-accused have been granted bail, I consider it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 2 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Uttam Teji s/o Anil Teji be released on bail in FIR No.95/2007, P.S. Phalodi provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-