IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO WRIT PETITION No.8932 of 2010 Between: P.Varavara Rao. … Petitioner And The Director General of Police and another … Respondents This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO WRIT PETITION No.8932 of 2010 ORDER: - (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy) This is a taken up writ petition on the basis of the telegram sent by the petitioner, dated 19.03.2010 alleging that one Cherukuri Raj Kumar @ Azad-alleged detenu, who was a student of the then R.E.C., Warrangal, co-detenu of the petitioner during the emergency of 1975-76, and spokes person of the C.P.I. was apprehended by the security forces of India, who is meant for operation Green Hunt against the Naxalites and was missing since 11.03.2010 and has not been produced before the Court so far. On issuing the notice, the Director General of Police-1st respondent filed a counter-affidavit stating that the alleged detenu is an underground cadre of C.P.I. (Maoist) and is in underground for more than 30 years and is wanted by the police of extremist affected states i.e., Andhra Pradesh, Chattisgarh, Jharkand, Orissa, Bihar and West Bengal. As the alleged detenu involved in many sensational violent incidents all over the country, he is evading arrest by the police. The police of all the affected states are making relentless efforts to apprehend the alleged detenu and also declared a reward of Rs.12,00,000/- for his apprehension as an incentive. The above telegram has been sent to divert the attention of the police and denied about the arrest of the alleged detenu by the Andhra Pradesh Police. Further, it is stated that the mother of the alleged detenu filed a petition before the A.P. State Human Rights Commission on 20.03.2010 stating that her son Cherukuri Raj Kumar @ Azad was arrested by the A.P. Police in Mumbai on 11.03.2010 and is kept in illegal custody. A detailed report was filed by the Director General of Police on 22.03.2010 before the A.P. State Human Rights Commission and on the same day, the petitioner filed a petition before the Commission seeking permission to withdraw the complaint and accordingly, the matter was closed. Having invoked the jurisdiction of the A.P.State Human Rights Commission by filing a complaint and when the 1st respondent filed a detailed report the petitioner withdrew the complaint, again invoking the jurisdiction of this Court by sending the present telegram with the very same allegation of illegal detention, is liable to be rejected. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. __________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J ________________ RAJA ELANGO, J 31st May 2010 lmv