C/g‘TQK- agmE gENCH‘ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. £1\'l\ 12011 / Bhuwan Singh Yadav, S/o Late Diwan Singh Yadav, Aged about 61 years, R/o — Clo — Sukhuram Yaduvanshi, Postman, Kukripara, Subash Nagar, g» Raipur, District — Raipur (CG) Petitioner Versus W State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Department of Education, DKS Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur, District — Raipur (CG) Jila Panchayat, Bastar, ‘ Disrtict Education Officer, Education District — Bloda-bazar, Baloda—bazar, District - Raipur (CG) Respondent No. 2 Block Education Officer, Palari, 1 District — Raipur (CG) Respondent No. 3 i Respondent No.1 “'Disdict Education Officer, Education District — Bloda-bazar, Baloda-bazar, District — Raipur (CG) Respondent No. 4 espondent No R . 5 ARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONE ‘ R (99‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETiTiON (S! NO. 2121 OF 2011 WRIT PETIT!ON UNDER ARTkCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUT’ON OF INDJA Single Bench : Hon‘ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present t- Shri Vivek Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y1S. Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State. Ms. Smita Ghaé, Advocate for the respondent No.5. ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 25‘ day of Apru, 201 1) s 1 . Learned counsel appeartng for the petitioner submits that the ca'se, being payment of retirai benefits matter, may be referred to the pension committee. t 2. This Court. in the matter of WP. Nor 4642/2004 (Baiinath Manda! V. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral does as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in WP. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Kefa Bai Chendrakar v. state Govemment and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhettisgerh & Others v. Bag‘ineth Mandei and another). Thus, this petition is squareiy covered by the judgment and order dated 31“ of January, 2008 passed in WP. No. 4642/2004 Bat/hath Mandel (supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. This petition is acoordingiy disposed of in the same terms i.e. the omce of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee. within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a -\\ copy of the’petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the l I Petitioner ‘ Bhuwan Singh Yadav Resnondents @ Committee shaH issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concerned, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shalt consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, The petitioner and the officers concerned may tiie additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retire! dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed‘within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall supply extra copy of the petition to the learned counsel appearing for the respondents for forwarding the same to the Committee. u W . M WWW Sal- SATISH K. ANGNIHORI Judge ,i