IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44599 of 2008 Deomuni Kumari @ Deo Muni Devi, wife of Madan Gopal Pathak, Mohalla Katra, Khajanchi Mandir, PS Bhagwan Bazar, District Saran – Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar 2 2.8.2011 HeardMr. Ashutosh Kumar, counsel for the petitioner and the A.P.P. representing the State. This application has been filed for quashing the order, dated 8.9.2008 passed in S.T. No. 198/2007 by the Additional Sessions Judge cum FTC II, Saran by which the court has refused to discharge the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an Advocate and her father is priest of the temple. There was some dispute with respect to a piece of land and for this reason the petitioner’s name has been dragged in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during investigation final report was submitted in favour of the petitioner. The cognizance was taken only by differing with the findings of the I.O. It is also submitted that the lady has been dragged in this case because of the dispute and it is not expected that she being a practicing Advocate whose husband is a Scientist would indulge in such activity. All these aspects of the matter can be considered during the trial of the case. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)