1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 7769 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 7769 OF 2010 *** 1. Heard Mr. Kutti for the Petitioner and Mr. Kulkarni for the Respondent. 2. By impugned order dated 30th January, 2010 Additional Commissioner, Nashik has allowed revision filed by present respondent and directed mutation entry to be taken in his name. Apart from other challenges Mr. Kutti pointed out that Regular Civil Suit NO. 429 of 2003 filed for injunction has been decreed in favour of the petitioner on 19th July, 2010. According to him, the mutation entry in name of petitioner, therefore, needs to be restored. Shri Kulkarni is not accepting this contention. 3. I do not find it necessary to record anything in this respect. If there is a finding by competent civil Court, the same is binding on Revisional Authority. 4. With liberty to petitioner to point out 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 7769 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. this subsequent development to the competent authority viz. Tahsildar, Jalgaon, present writ petition is disposed of. If any such application is made by petitioner, same shall be decided by Tahsildar uninfluenced by the observations contained in impugned order before this Court. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:26/04/2011. ans/7769