IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2009 / 2ND POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 37527 of 2009(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SASIDHARAN.B, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O. SANKARA PANICKER, PUNNOTHU PUTHENPURA HOUSE, ELANKUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.BOSE SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN SRI.P.VENUGOPAL SMT.NISHA BOSE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMET, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, OFFICE OFO THE DEPUTY DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION, MALAPPURAM. 3. THE EMPLOYMENT OFFICER, DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE, MALAPPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEDER SMT. ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 37527 OF 2009 (I) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2009 J U D G M E N T In response to a requisition made by the 2nd respondent, the 3rd respondent sponsored candidates for appointment to the post of Part Time Menial. Among those sponsored, petitioner was one of the candidates. Though appointment was made, petitioner was not selected. It is aggrieved by this that the writ petition is filed. 2. Evidently, the petitioner who had only a right to be considered, was duly considered. In the selection process, it is up to the appointing authority to choose the best candidate available and appoint such candidate. This is precisely what has been done. 3. I see nothing objectionable in this process. Writ Petition fails and is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :