IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14152 of 2011 VIKASH KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 17.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that the complainant gave Rs. 1, 50,000/- to the petitioner for execution of the sale deed, but the petitioner neither executed the sale deed nor returned the money. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the payment was made in cash. It appears from the impugned order that initially, the complaint was dismissed but in pursuance to the revisional court's order, the cognizance was taken on the same material, on basis of which, the earlier complaint was dismissed. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in 2 the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 1357/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)