0208wp2716.11.odt 1 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2716 of 2011. Hemant Suklal Rahangdale ..vs.. Prakash Rahangdale ............................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ............................................................................................................................................................... Mr. O.D.Kakde, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : 2nd August, 2011. The above petition takes exception to the order dated 11/2/2011 passed by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Bhandara by which order the application for interrogatories filed by the petitioner came to be rejected. The said application has been rejected on the ground that if the person, to whom the interrogatories, omits to answer or answers insufficiently then party applying for interrogatories may apply to the court for an order requiring the said person to answer by affidavit as the court may direct. In my view, considering the order passed by the Trial Court as also considering the fact that the petitioner can always put the question at the time of cross-examination of the witness concerned, there is no need to interdict with the impugned order. It is well settled that interrogatories are only by way of shortening the litigation and limit the controversy. However, that does not take away the rights of the parties in so far as leading of evidence is concerned. With the aforesaid observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. JUDGE chute 0208wp2716.11.odt 2