@M” \? HRGH COEWI' §F CHHKTTISGARH: BILASWJR win Petmon {s} No. 2338 ‘f 2mg Fetitiongi; Sm-t. Kamla Maheswari, aged abaut 6C years. Wia RN Mahe5wari, R/o. Cfo. Jagdish Pd. Agrawaé House} lst Ficor, Near Mahrastriafr Dharamshaia‘ Ashwani Nagar, Mahadevghat Road Raipur‘ Veysus Respandents 1) The Educaticn State Qenartment: of C‘n‘nattisqa gKfSéBhawan, w *hr ugh its Serretaw Raiipur" 2) District Education Officer, Raipur. (Writ Petitmn under Articie 225 of the Constituiion cf india) SE: Honabie Mr. $atish K. §grzi§mirL J. ?resent: h i Parag Katecha. counsei forms petitianer, Shri Aiok Bakshi‘ GQvt. Advecate farthe Séate. ORRL ORDER (gassed cm 24““ day w Andi? 2mg) With ccnsent 0f ieamed counsei appearmg for both the pames, the matter is heard f‘maHy. 2) Learned oounsei appearing fer the petitmner. at this stage, subrm‘ts that the wetitioner does no? want to contest this matter an meréti except irrat the represerrtatiah dated 26-12—2OQ6 (Annexure Pi3) pending befare the respcnderrts authority be eecided exoeditiousiv, in accordance with taw. 3) Learned counsel appearing for the /State submit that there ie no reason asto why the representation, if pending may not be decided wrthin a reasonabie time, in accordance with ia “r. 4‘; in View of the above, the oetition is disoosed of with a direetion to respondents authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation, in accordance with iaw on its own merit, expeditiousiy. Ram Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge