^^^ ^ -o c^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. -1-'?36 / 2003 PETITIONE :^?< Shashankan, aged about 45 years, son of ^ A / ^a/te Shri Suselan Vaidhya, resident of Shop "No. 185A Market Sector VI Bhilai Nagar, ^^..."/^'. ^•^«\-%^-"""' / Distt- Dur§(Chhattisgarh). ..^s^ .^•^^>'' ^Ksr" ^ ^•^ ••- VERSUS ^v RESPONDENTS 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through : Secretaiy, Department of Home, D.K.S. Bhawan, / / Raipur (Chhattisgarh). s?«Lmf^<ys' 2)^ Superinten^ent of Police, Distt. Durg ^•^ •."-^ ^^y%^ '^ ^ ^ /'z^ .^y •^y '€^:^"r^^ ^SIi^?^ (Chhattisgarh). 3) Town Inspector Police Kotwali, Sector - VI Bhilai, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh). 4) R.K. Rai, Assistant Sub Inspector, Police Kotwali - Bhilainagar, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh). 5) J.8. Chouhan, Assistant Sub Inspector, Police Kotwali, Sector VI, Bhilainagar, Distt. Durg Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. HSGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BSLASPUR WRIT PETITJON N0.1736 of 2003 Petitioner Shashankan Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others WR!T PET1TION UNDER ARTiCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTiON OF iNDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Anil Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate forthe State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 7th day of October, 2010) 1. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permlssion of' this Court to withdraw this petition on the ground that the petition has become infructuous, to which learned counse! appearing for other side has no objection. 2. It is ordered, as prayed for. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as withdrawn. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge Ashok