.K.S.%' g^. B.: ' ^£^. ss' -. 8|iS;i ^^ l^i^:' ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Cr. M. P. No-^ W2010 APPLICANTS ACCUSED PERSONS :1. Moti Lal, Son of Raghunath, Caste Sahu, aged about 32 years, 2. Smt. Narmada Devi, Wife of Raghunath, Caste Sahu, aged about 72 years, 3. Pramod Kumar, S/o. Raghunath Sahu, aged about 44 years, 4. Harish Sahu, Son of Raghunath Sahu, aged about 34 years, s- _^\v0-^:--'sM^ 5" ?mt' vimla sahu' se^-'of Kamod '.'0^"^.^^ Sahu, aged about 39 years, >••• :'^ ^^ \y" 6. Kamini Sahu, Wife of Harish Sahu, aged about 30 years, 7. Kashiram, S/o. Raghunath Sahu, aged about 49 years, All resident Pamgarh of Semariya, ^^- '^' 8. Smt. Dhanvantari Sahu, aged about 38 years, at present Quarter No. 299, Sector -3A, Type, Balco Nagar. 9. Baliram Sahu, Son of Raghunath Sahu, aged about 46 years, 10. Smt. Asha Devi, Wife of Bali Ram Sahu, aged about 34 years, Applicants No. 9 and 10 resident of Semariya, presently near Jora Talab, Bilaspur, P. S. Sarkanda, BUaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C. G.) w VERSUS iSii NON-APPLICANTS ,1 K K aa .ws Iffi State of Chhattisgarh Through : Police Station Pamgarh, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) Smt. Kavita Sahu, wife of Shri Moti lal Sahu, aged 22 years, Occupation House wife, R/o. through Baleshwar Prasad Sahu, Road No. NPA Qr. No. 4/B, Sector-4, Bhilai Nagar, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.) APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL^PROCEDURE FOR QUASHING THE COMPLAINT/F.I.R.,/ •iE:—»; s ' .^'..^ Bl li^'.y igt' '^'i' ^^K a'. 'SSK.' 3iA?rw R|-< WT ^TT^T ai+iicti NIHCTI 9nw«h ysr '<ii<ii<<i'4, ®T|I'M'I|S,[»«iiy'j,< ...C..<:....'?VVY?...3....{._ V^20^V 3n^?TTI^? (1c<fjsl<St!T) TOITW^lfelsiI^f S.B: HON'BLE JUSTICE M 04-02-2010: Mr. Kundan Singh applicants. Mr. Rajendra Tripat Mr. Vineet Pandey non-applicantNo. 2. Appficant namely namely Smt. Kavita Saht identified by their respecti It has been stated settled the matter and pui appljcant No. 2 has atso v 125 of the Code of Crimii agreed for mutual divorce ^. Mr. Rakesh Sharma, counsel for the .9 Joint application i.i parties under Section 32C(2) for permission to compou^d The aforesaid app!i< affidavits of the parties. amicably compromised t| any fear or pressure iron\ have any dispute betweerl <^i<<w41l *iWV^ ^ fe^ ^^i<. ^affinai^t R. PRITINKER DIWAKER |ii, counset forthe respondent/State. pi Mr. Vijay Swarnkar, counsel for the }4otilal and the non-applicant No. 2 are present in person and they are 1/e counsel. t^y the parties that they have amicably Isuant to the said settlement, the non- I'ithdrawn the case filed under Section hal Procedure and both of them have •. I.A. No. 03 has been ffled by the of the Code of Criminal Procedure the offence. ;ation has been duly suppQrted by the It is stated that the parties have ie dispute outside the court without anyone and henceforth they will not them. ^ssy^ ;e' \'^s€/ -Faie'sSi-HC—7S wwir fhwvn 3^ ^wwi, &-^v\<c, [~^v\wy. ..(?x.Mf.......^...L. v 311^1•T^T (Tpfg^ET) SH^T ^I K-U'h Wff STI^T st>*lich OT> t^iiw ^ifCT sn^i In this view of th{ above is allowed and thel permitted to be entered in| The resuit of this the appiicants of the offf A/34ofthelndianPenal (lompromise would be the acquittal of ;nce punishable under Section 498- Qode. Ordered accordingly. __. prit^erW^ar ludge ^i^f^4^ 'w^ff ^' fs^ <r<fl^i< ^aifgirsn^i matter, the application mentioned compromise desired by the parties is :0.