IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 14TH AUGUST 2008 / 23RD SRAVANA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 655 of 2008(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENTIN WPC.35810/2007 .................... PETITIONER : ----------------- HAMEED MUKHAM VEETTIL, LIZHAKKEVETTUNCHERRY HOUSE,MAMBURAM P.O., THIRURANGADI-676 306,REP.BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER K.I.NOOR MOHAMMED MATHER, MATHER BUILDINGS, MARKET ROAD,KOCHI-682 035. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE THOMAS (MEVADA) RESPONDENTS: ------------- SMT.MINI ANTONY I.A.S., RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT NO.4, SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF COCHIN, COCHIN-11. BY SRI.S.RAMESH BABU, SC, COCHIN CORPORATION THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C.C.(C) No. 655 OF 2008 IN W.P.(c).No. 35810 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 14th day of August, 2008 JUDGMENT Having considered the affidavit filed by the respondent Secretary of the Corporation and having heard the submissions of Sri.George Thomas, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Ramesh Babu, standing counsel for the Cochin Corporation, I dispose of the contempt of court case without initiating any action against the respondent for contempt. At the same time there will be a direction to the respondent to pass immediate orders on the rectified plan submitted by the petitioner and communicate those orders along with the permit, if any granted, to the petitioner. This will be done by the respondent at the earliest and at any rate within ten days of receiving copy of this judgment. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE sv.