IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7882 of 2008 Kanti Singh, Daughger of Shri Haridwar Singh, resident of village Preetampur, P.O. Tengari, P.S. Barun, District- Aurangabad. …………. Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya 3.The District Magistrate, Aurangabad 4.The D.D.C., Aurangabad 5.The Block Development Officer, Block Barun, District- Aurangabad 6.Panchayat Sachiv, Panchayat Raj Bhopatpur, Block Barun, District- Aurangabad 7.Mukhiya Panchayat Raj Bhopatpur, Block Barun, District- Aurangabad 8.Saroj Devi, wife of Shri Muni Lal Singh, resident of village Barwadin, P.O. Siris, P.S. Barun, District- Aurangabad. ……….. Respondents ---------------------------------- 2. 08/08/2011 Petitioner is aggrieved by appointment of respondent no.8 as Panchayat Teacher inspite of the fact that she had higher marks. It appears that the petitioner has filed her complaints before some authorities of the Government. However, it is submitted that no action has been taken on the same till now. After constitution of the statutory Appellate Authority in terms of 2008 amendment in the Rules, petitioner has an alternative remedy before the concerned 2 statutory Appellate Authority. In the circumstances, this writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the concerned Appellate Authority in accordance with law within four weeks from today. If such an appeal is filed, the Appellate Authority shall issue notice to the concerned parties giving them opportunity to be heard, shall call for the original records, if necessary, and shall decide the matter on its own merits within two months from the date of filing of appeal by the petitioner. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)