3D^[^rTC;tiW ^.ati^raiim; .1.*' 3'^^rpn^T, ({iTfl'y'i^, fsi^ray;. ^ ..^.ie^..M:...NB.:..2^..^ sn^r •'raw (iyF'l»t<«i) ^, v. A^l 100 <*>l'4h'l<<l*1 '^(Rcff '^fjfe1^ ^R»l^i< ^73?RW3n^?T PETITiONER: -V RESPONDENTS Singie Bencn 2-11-2007 Mr. N.K. Chatterji, coun^e Mr. P.S. Koshy, Couns^l Heard. Sy thls petition, the p< dated 29.6.2006 passed byth|s petition Mo. 6356/2005 fiied ^ rsus 1. .2. Muchhan S/o Amzad Ali, aged about 52 years, Clerk Grade-il Bijuri Colliery, R/o Bijuri Colliery, Hasdeo area, Distt. Shahdoi (M.P.5 Managing Director, The South Eastern Coa! fields Limited, Head Office, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) Chief General Manager (Adni South I Eastern Coal Fields Limjted, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Chjef General Manager, Hasdeo Area.Bijuri Colliery, Distt. Shahdo! (M.P.) 4. Dy. Generai Manager The South Eastern Cosl Fields Limited Bijuri Up Kshetra Bijuri, Distt. Shahdol (M.P.) (F^eview Petition) Hon'bie Mr. Justice L.C. Bhadoo ^el for the petitioner. for respondents. h order ptioner has prayed for review^@a#ie Coyrt, v/hereby white disposing of the writ y the petitioner this Court passed the order -11 -lC—78 <6al!?i[ft:iW ww (— 7SSI •-i|l<<|<?)<l, yiTn<f'l<o, Is|01'M^< ; 3ii^?r wra (1pfg;nq<i) . ^. W^^fO ^giWdfei sn^i —2-— +l<lf<'T'41Tl 'WRlf "ifjfe^ <f^^l< iTsjfim sii^i that the respondents to ^ Determination Committee to For seeking review of] required to show that on the] matter or evidence which, a| within his knowledge or coul^ the decree was passed or or<] error apparent on the face^of I he desires to obtain a reviev^l him. !n the present case, the review petition is that, while consider the documents filed date of birth and educatfonal issued by Bihar Vidyapeeth i; correction ofdate of birth has 1 have perused the ord ths respective parties were ta all the points raised by the pel passed the order thatin the that in order to 'ascertain c Determination Committee de petitioner's case be referred accordance with the require Medical Board after medically the requirement of'Medica! J r^fer the case of th.e petitioner to Ags c|etermine the age of petitioner. orderor judgment.the party aggrieved is ground of discovery of new and important fter the exercise of due diligence v/as not not be produced by him at the time when |er made, or on account of some mistake or |he record, or for any other sufficient reason, t?f the decree passed or order made agalnst 1 ground on which the petitioner has filed this p^ssing the order impugned, the Court did not by the petitioner i.e. Certificate regarding certificate- Annexure-P-4 and mark-sheets ^ Annexures-P-5 & P-6. The appiication for t>een fSled by the petitioner in the Court. l^r dated 29.6.2006. The documents filed by i|<en into consideration and after considering ttioner as also by the respondents, the Court (;ircumstances, it appears to be appropriaie ^orrect age of the petitioner, !et the Age (ermine the age of the petitioner and the fo the Medical Board for examination in 'hient of "Medical Jurisprudence" and the lexamining the petitioner in accordance with tirisprudence", determine the age and same -HG—78 at^SliH'fttW TISS 3H^9F st)+(i<ti ^ r~\^: Amit 3:5ST "i)|*||^<t|, (SiTfly'KS, fidlUy X; an^?r TRW (4fi('l«!<ff) ;200 ^tOl^T -yf?fl SiH^FT -3- Aste shall be forwarded to the Ast Determination Committee aftl the pefitioner, the age record^ Board shall decide the date In view of the above, i1 order had directed that all the I be considered by the Age Dett of the Medica! Board, Theref \1 a!leged by the petitioner wej dated 29.6.2006 as such the case for review of the order d^ in the result; this revievl dismissed and is hereby dismi •fciitd'il-f imaf if.fe^ <Rit$i< ^st^tH^II^ff A^e Determination Committee, then the Age »considering the certificates submitted by id in Form-B and the opinion of the Medical of|birth of the petitioner, and that shail be final. is evident that the Court whiie passing the |certificates produced by the petitioner are to irmination Committee along with the opinion Fore, it cannot be said that documents as |'e not considered while passing the order setitioner has not been able to make out the d^ted 29.6.2006. petitlon being devoid of merit is liable to be i^sed. Sd/-~ ~~ L.C,Bhadoo Judge