IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 3367 of 2009 Between: 1 Mrs. Ghousia Begum W/o.late Fakruddin R/o.H.No.19-3-1089/C/31, Jahanuma, Hyderabad. 2 Mir Afsar Ali S/o.late Fakruddin R/o.H.No.18-8-225/7/22/A, Habeebnagar, Hyderabad. 3 Mir Iqbal Ali S/o.late Fakruddin R/o.H.No.19-3-1089/C/31, Jahanuma, Hyderabad. 4 Mrs. Feroz Pasha D/o.late Fakruddin and wife of Syed Waheeduddin R/o.H.No.19-2-11/34/74/1, Yakutpura, Hyderabad. 5 Mrs. Ashraf Begum D/o.Mir Afsar Ali R/o.H.No.18-8-225/7/22/A, Habeebnagar, Hyderabad. 6 Mrs. Akther Begum D/o.Mir Afsar Ali R/o.H.No.19-3-838, Hamalwad, Gazibanda, Hyderabad. 7 Mrs. Ather Begum D/o.Mir Afsar Ali R/o.H.No.18-8-225/7/22/A, Habeebnagar, Hyderabad. 8 Mrs. Fouzia Begum D/o.Mir Afsar Ali R/o.H.No.18-8-225/7/22/A, Habeebnagar, Hyderabad. 9 Mrs. Haseena Begum D/o. Mir Iqbal Ali R/o.H.No.19-3-1089/C/31, Jahanuma, Hyderabad. 10 Mrs.Rubina Begum D/o. Mir Iqbal Ali R/o.H.No.19-3-1089/C/31, Jahanuma, Hyderabad. 11 Mrs. Mariam Begum D/o. Mir Iqbal Ali R/o.H.No.19-3-1089/C/31, Jahanuma, Hyderabad. 12 Mir Mustafa Ali S/o.Mir Iqbal Ali R/o.H.No.19-3-1089/C/31, Jahanuma, Hyderabad. 13 Mrs. Anees Sultana D/o.Feroz Pasha R/o.19-2-11/34/74/1, Yakutpura, Hyderabad. 14 Mrs. Asma Sultana D/o.Feroz Pasha R/o.19-2-11/34/74/1, Yakutpura, Hyderabad. 15 Syed Imranuddin S/o.Feroz Pasha R/o.19-2-11/34/74/1, Yakutpura, Hyderabad. 16 Syed Mohsinuddin S/o.Feroz Pasha R/o.19-2-11/34/74/1, Yakutpura, Hyderabad. 17 Mrs.Reshma Sultana D/o.Feroz Pasha R/o.19-2-11/34/74/1, Yakutpura, Hyderabad. 18 Mrs. Ishrat Begum D/o.Mir Afsar Ali R/o.H.No.18-8-225/7/22/A, Habeebnagar, Hyderabad. (All the petitioners are rep. by their G.P.A. Mr.Nageshwara Rao Chitte S/o.late CPN Chowdhary, R/o. Flat No.307, Vishnu Sai Towers, Maheshnagar, ECIL,Hyd.) ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary (Revenue), Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Special Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3 The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Andhra Pradesh, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad. 4 The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order, direction or appropriate writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the application of the petitioners filed for regularization of their land in Survey No.129/103, Shaikpet village in the light of the Judgment dated 13.2.2001 of this Hon'ble Court rendered in W.A.No.859 of 1991, W.A.No.872 of 1991 and W.A.No.1118 of 1996 alongwith other similar lands listed in G.O.Ms.No.942, dated 26.3.1983 in the interest of justice and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.M.V.S.SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 3367 of 2009 29-06-2009 Oral Order: The singular grievance in the writ petition is that the respondents are not considering the case of the petitioners for regularisation of their occupation of Government lands in survey Nos. 129/103 of Shaikpet village in the light of the judgment dated 13-02-2001 in W.A.No. 859 of 1991; W.A.No. 872 of 1991 and W.A.No. 1118 of 1996. The 4th respondent has filed a counter affidavit stating that after quashing of the earlier Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.942 dated 23-06-1983, the Government has constituted a Cabinet Sub- Committee to which the cases of the private parties in W.A.No. 859 of 1991 and batch has been referred to for consideration of their cases. Since the petitioners claim a similar status as the others whose cases have been referred to the Cabinet Sub-Committee, the answering respondent by the letter dated 03-02-2009 addressed the Government to take a decision whether the case of the petitioners should also be placed before the Cabinet Sub-Committee. The petitioners are satisfied with this processing of their application for regularisation. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of recording the submissions on behalf of the respondents set out in paragraph Nos. 12 and 13 of the counter affidavit of the 4th respondent. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 29-06-2009 Pvks