1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2172 OF 2008 ... Shri R.V.Chalke ...Petitioner v/s. Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents ... Mr.N.M.Ganguli for the Petitioner. Mr.D.A.Nalawade with Mr.D.a.Dubey for Respondent No.1. Ms.S.U.Bharcha for Respondent No.2. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, & R.G.KETKAR, JJ DATED: 17th August, 2009 P.C.: Heard the learned Counsel for both sides. It is clear from the order dated 24th April, 2007 2 passed in Writ Petition No.290 of 2007 that the Petitioner was to submit a detailed representation making out his case for payment of provident fund and he was also to produce documentary evidence in support of his claim. Perusal of the representation of the Petitioner dated 14-6-2007 made after the order dated 24th April, 2007 shows that the Petitioner has not given any details, has not referred to any law which makes him entitled to the payment. He has also not produced any documentary evidence. In our opinion, considering that this is the claim made by the retired person for payment of provident fund, following order would meet the ends of justice. O R D E R (i)If within a period of six months from 3 today the Petitioner makes a detailed representation giving all the details about his entitlement to receive the provident fund, supported by documentary evidence procured by the Petitioner from his employer and also from the office of the Provident Fund Commissioner and also fill in Form-19 for withdrawal of the provident fund, the Asst. Provident Fund Commissioner shall make inquiry into that representation and make speaking order thereon in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, in any case within a period of eight weeks from the date on which the Petitioner submits his detail representation and documentary evidence in support of his claim to the Asst. Provident Fund Commissioner. (ii) In case the order of the Asst.Provident Fund Commissioner is 4 adverse to the interest of the Petitioner, then the Petitioner will be at liberty to take appropriate steps that may be available to him under the law against that order. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (R.G.KETKAR, J.)