IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4443 of 2008 Between: Sri Tedlapu Appa Rao & others. … Petitioners AND The C.I. of Police, III Town Law & Order Police Station, Visakhapatnam & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri P. Satyanarayana Counsel for respondents 1&2: AGP for Home Counsel for respondent No.4: Sri G. Thuhin Kumar This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4443 of 2008 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.1 and 2 in interfering with the civil dispute between the petitioners and respondent No.4. Heard Sri P. Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Sri G. Thuhin Kumar for respondent No.4. The only grievance of the petitioners expressed in this writ petition is that respondent Nos.1 and 2 are interfering with their personal life and liberty without following the due process of law. In the counter affidavit filed by the Sub-Inspector of Police, III Town Law and Order Police Station, Visakhapatnam, it is specifically averred that on the complaint lodged by respondent No.4 on 22.01.2008 against one Mr. Gondu Krishna Rao, S/o. Gaddiah, resident of Visakhapatnam alleging that the latter trespassed into the property of 400 square yards in plot No.58 of Laxminagar Lay Out, Shivajipalem, Visakhapatnam, crime No.52 of 2008 was registered under Sections 447 and 506 IPC on the same day and that the petitioners are not shown as the accused in the said crime. He denied the allegation of the petitioners that the police are interfering with their life and liberty and stated that the said allegations have no basis whatsoever. In view of the statement contained in the counter affidavit, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to approach this Court, if in future the police interfere with their personal life and liberty without following the due process of law. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.5782 of 2008 and WVMP.No.973 of 2008 are disposed of as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 04.04.2008 ES