IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-17516 of 2010 Date of Decision: 22.6.2010 Nirmala Devi and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present :- Mr. Amandeep Singh Cheema, Advocate for the petitioners ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Complainant has moved an application dated 31.3.2009 under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. Learned Magistrate vide order dated 31.3.2010 called the report from the SHO on application under Section 156(3) for 26.4.2010. On 26.4.2010, learned Magistrate observed that report was not received and again called for 29.5.2010. However, no report was submitted by the concerned SHO before learned Magistrate. Hence, learned Magistrate passed impugned order dated 29.5.2010 by observing that neither any FIR has been lodged nor any report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. has been submitted as required by law and directed the SHO concerned to send his report on or before 8.7.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioners argued that order dated 29.5.2010 is without jurisdiction and report has already been registered against two persons excluding the petitioners. He further argued that now FIR shall be registered against the petitioners also in the light of order dated 29.5.2010 which is not warranted under the law. Crl. Misc. No. M-17516 of 2010 2 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners, I find no jurisdiction error or misuse of process of law in the impugned order. The petition is devoid of merit, hence dismissed. After order is dictated learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition. The petition is permitted to be withdrawn. (ALOK SINGH) 22.6.2010 JUDGE reena