CR-8095 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.8095 of 2011 Date of decision: 16.11.2012 Kundan Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. R.S. Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Rajan Gupta, J. In the instant revision petition petitioner has impugned the order whereby he has challenged the order passed by the executing court. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the order passed is totally against law. The executing court ignored from consideration that land of the petitioner was abutting the G.T. Road. However, compensation had been granted for lesser area. If entire Khasra adjoining to G.T. Road had been considered, higher compensation would be payable. Thus, calculation done by the department is erroneous. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and given careful thought to the facts of the case. It appears that an award was passed by Land Acquisition Collector regarding certain land acquired by the Government. A land reference was made pertaining to 41 Kanals 05 Marlas of land. The decree holder claimed that entire area of said land abutted the G.T. Road. CR-8095 of 2011 2 This plea was resisted by the judgment debtors pointing out that only 08 Kanals 13 Marlas abutted G.T. Road. Rest was situated towards the back. Decree holder had, thus, tried to get excess compensation by giving wrong particulars. The executing court examined the plea of the decree holder. It, however, came to the conclusion that claim was wrongly made. Calculation submitted by the decree holder was not correct. Besides, entire compensation had been paid to the decree holder on 15.7.2005. Thus, there was no merit in the execution application. I find no infirmity with the impugned order. No interference in revisional jurisdiction is warranted. The revision is hereby dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 16.11.2012 'rajpal'