IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-6580 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 27th April, 2009 Jagdish … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana … Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Ashok Tyagi, Advocate for Mr. B.S. Rathee, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Mor, Sr. Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the State. Mr. Vijay Pal, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Criminal Misc. No.20748 of 2009 For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and documents (Annexures P-6 and P-7) are taken on record. Criminal Misc. No.20749 of 2009 For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and exemption from filing certified and translated copies of the documents is granted. Criminal Misc. No. M-6580 of 2009 Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 114 dated 06.02.2009 registered at Police Station Jind under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC. Criminal Misc. No. M-6580 of 2009 (O&M) On March 5, 2009, this Court had passed the following order: “On the oral prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, Smt.Laxmi Devi wife of Mohan Lal, and Smt.Kamla Devi wife of Sh.Ram Kishan, residents of Rani Pond, Jind, are impleaded as respondents No.2 and 3. Counsel for the petitioner has contended that he has purchased the land vide sale deed (Annexure P-4). On strength of sale deed (Annexure P-3), petitioner sold the land to newly added respondents. However, inadvertently, in the sale deed wrong killa number was given. Counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner is ready and willing to rectify the error and put the newly added respondents in possession of land in pursuance of sale deed (Annexure P-5). Issue notice of motion to learned Advocate General, Haryana, for 20.3.2009. Meanwhile, in the event of arrest, petitioner shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. Petitioner shall join investigation as and when called for. Petitioner shall also abide by the conditions specified under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.” Thereafter, the matter has been adjourned on various dates. Counsel for the State has submitted that petitioner had purchased the land from Tek Chand and Tek Chand was in fact impersonated by one Ajmer son of Om Parkash. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in fact he is the victim at the hands of Ajmer, who had impersonated Tek Chand. Counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Satyawan Singh, has stated that petitioner has joined the investigation, made his disclosure statement and has disclosed all the facts therefore, he is no longer required for further custodial interrogation. Counsel for the State has further submitted that investigation has revealed that the main accused are Ram Niwas, Ajmer and one Ramesh. Criminal Misc. No. M-6580 of 2009 (O&M) In view of the statement made by counsel for the State, interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated March 5, 2009 is made absolute till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. With these observations, present petition is disposed off. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE April 27, 2009 rps