IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No. 3101 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:- 30.09.2011 Ashwani Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of U.T., Chandigarh .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present:- Mr. Deepak Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajive Sharma, Advocate for U.T., Chandigarh. Mr. Inderjeet Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 2. **** AJAY TEWARI, J. This order may be read in continuation of the order dated 07.09.2011. Learned Standing Counsel for the U.T., Chandigarh has stated that some information has been received through the efforts of the Investigating Officer and the co-operation of the petitioner towards the details of the registered owner of the vehicle. He has given those details. Learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 submits that it is also disputed that the petitioner has paid sum of Rs. 75,000/- to the respondent No. 2. In the circumstances, I deem it appropriate that even while upholding contents of the petitioner to reduce the sentence to that which he has already undergone. Order accordingly. The revision stands disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) 30.09.2011 JUDGE shabha