1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5420 OF 2009 (Jugalkishor S. Sharma vs. Santosh S. Sharma) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JANUARY 04, 2010. Heard Shri Sohoni, learned counsel for the petitioner. The challenge is to the order dated 14.07.2009 passed below Exh. 40 whereby the application of the petitioner – plaintiff to join subsequent purchasers as parties has been rejected. The suit is for declaration and the sales were disclosed by the respondent – defendant in Exh. 19 while filing written statement. Thereafter the application for amendment vide Exh. 25 was moved by the petitioner on 16.08.2007 and no such steps were taken. The application by Exh. 40 was filed on 18.03.2009. The trial Court has found the step to be belated and after commencement of examination-in-chief. It also found that these steps could have been taken while filing Exh. 25. Shri Sohoni, learned counsel tries to contend that sale deed disclosing the name of purchaser was placed on record on the date prior to 18.03.2009. He has invited attention to said application at Exh. 40 for 2 said purpose. The application does not disclose any such statement. In such situation, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is, therefore, not entertained. Liberty to the petitioner to challenge the impugned order after the suit is finally decided, if occasion therefor arises. JUDGE *GS.