IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11300 of 2010 RAJ BALLABH SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30-Apr-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The officials of the Bihar State Electricity Board have alleged that in the inspection they found that in the flour mill of the petitioner one 10-HP motor was being run with illegal connection and that has caused loss of Rs.1,80,801/- On behalf of the petitioner it has been submitted that allegations are false and the motor has not been seized. Learned counsel for the State has pointed out that the PVC wire used for extracting electrical energy as well as Feeta which is used for connecting the electrical motor with the mill machine have also been seized. Considering the allegations, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. This order shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner if he surrenders and seeks regular bail. In case, the petitioner deposits the loss amount along with compounding fee as per law, in that case, his prayer for bail should be considered favourably on the date of surrender itself. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh,J.)