IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1. CWP. No. 17046 of 2010 Date of Decision: 21.9.2010. Nand Lal Chandel --Petitioner Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & others --Respondents 2. CWP. No. 17047 of 2010 Nand Lal Chandel --Petitioner Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & others --Respondents 3. CWP. No. 17048 of 2010 Nand Lal Chandel --Petitioner Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & others --Respondents 4. CWP. No. 17049 of 2010 Nand Lal Chandel --Petitioner Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & others --Respondents 5. CWP. No. 17050 of 2010 Nand Lal Chandel --Petitioner Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. S.S. Sudan, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) The entire case of the petitioner is that the fraud has been committed by the insurance company and secured the order of recovery against the petitioner, who is the owner of the vehicles. Petitioner did raise such a plea during the execution proceedings, however, his contention has been rejected in view of the finality of the award passed by the M.A.C.T. The matter needs investigation but writ petition may not be the appropriate remedy. CWP. No. 17046 of 2010 -2- In this view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw these petitions with liberty to seek appropriate remedy available under law. Prayer allowed. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Copy of this order be placed on each connected file. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 21.9.2010. lucky