In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 6680 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision:October 11, 2010 Ajit Singh and another ---Petitioners versus Krishan Kumar Miglani and others ---Respondents Coram: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH *** Present: Mr.M.L.Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners *** GURDEV SINGH, J. Heard. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 22.9.2010 passed by Civil Judge(Junior Division) Abohar, dismissing the application of the petitioners filed under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for impleading them as parties, on the ground that they have purchased the property in dispute, vide sale deeds dated 7.2.2008 and 22.9.2008 and that their presence before the court is necessary for deciding the suit. A person can been impleaded as a party against the wishes of the plaintiff, whose presence is effectively and completely necessary for deciding the controversy between the parties. Admittedly, the petitioners have purchased the property in dispute during the pendency of the suit and by no stretch of imagination, it can be said that their presence is necessary before the Court for deciding the controversy effectively and completely. Moreover, the sale deeds in their favour are hit by the doctrine of lis pendence, as contained in Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. There is no merit in this revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed. (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE October 11, 2010 PARAMJIT