IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1888 of 2010. Pawan Singh S/O Raj Pal Singh. … Petitioner. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and two others. …Respondents. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. P.C.Bisht, Brief Holder, learned counsel for the respondents. Date November 9, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Interim Relief Application) Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to release forthwith the amount deposited by the petitioner in lieu of parking at the main gate Gurukul Kangri University, Haridwar, which was allotted to the petitioner of which possession was never handed over to the petitioner. According to the petitioner, his tender for parking in Kumbh Mela 2010 at Main Gate of Gurukul Kangri University Haridwar was accepted and in compliance of order of the concerned Mela Adhikari, the petitioner deposited security amount to the tune of Rs. 8,00,000/- in the form of demand draft drawn in favour of the respondent no.2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the possession of the parking place was never delivered to the petitioner due to opposition of the University administration. 2 In the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the ends of justice would be served if a direction is issued to the Mela Adhikari to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 4-6-2010, which is still pending for disposal (Annexure-11 to the petition) by a speaking order. Prayer is innocuous. Accordingly, the Mela Adhikari concerned is directed to decide the representation dated 4-6-2010 of the petitioner in accordance with law by a speaking order (Annexure-11 collectively) within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP