r -^ . (oA-^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 7^> y C—OF2010 PETITIONERS Stgg3(5g|^ Presefi'ted .....^.^"^2' ^'^^ISSS 1^'" 6, Mahendra Kumar Diwan, S/o Sonu Ram Diwan, aged about 36 years, working as Electrician in Nagar Panchayat Arjunda District- Durg (C.G.) Shekhar Yadav, S/o Shri Radhe Yadav aged about 25 years, working as Peon in Nagar Panchayat Arjunda, District- Durg (C.G.) Lalit Patel, S/o Shri Sant Kumar Patel aged about 37 years, working as Assistant Clerk in Nagar Panchayat, Arjunda, District- Durg (C.G.) Deo Kura.ar Yadav S/o Shri Narendra Yadav, aged about 42 years, working as Computer Operator in Nagar Panchayat Arjunda, District Durg (C.G.) Rekh Lal Tandon S/o Shri Bhagoli Tandon, aged about 40 years, working as Computer Operator in Nagar Panchayat Arjunda, District Diu-g (C.G.) Naresh Kumar S/o Shri Hemnath aged about 38 years, working as Sweeper in Nagar Panchayat Arjunda, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Principal, Secretary, Department of Urban Adm.inistration and Development, ^ •^i^S-^^-^S^ <' Mantralaya at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ,2. The Under Secretary, Department of UrbanAdininistration at D.K.S. BhawanRaipur (C.G.) 3. Nagar Panchayat Arjunda, District- Durg. Through its Chief Municipal Officer, Arjunda, District- Durg (C.G.) , 4. The Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Arjunda, District- Durg (C.G.) 5. The President, Nagar Panchayat, Arjunda, District- Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. gilllSw-BiS Bi1' <^^ M iX HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 7592 of 2010 PETITIONERS : Mahendra Kumar Diwan & Others VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh& Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satjsh K. AanihotrLJ. Present: Shri Avinash Chand Sahu, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAU (Passedon 21st dayofApril, 2011) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties fairly submit that the issue with regard to applicability of circulars dated 23/09/2010 and 05/03/2008 was considered in Virendra Das Manikpuh & Others v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others1. This Court, after hearing all the parties, considered the issue and passed the order in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others . This petition may be disposed ofaccordingly. 2. Thus, having regarding to the facts situation of the case, wherein the issue involved in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others as well as in this case are one and the same, the instant petition stands disposed of in the same terms and order passed in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others1. ___ Sd/- Satish K. Agaihotri Judge Arun 1 W.P.(S) No. 7450 of 2010, decided on 10.02.2011