IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 3RD OCTOBER 2011 / 11TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 23030 of 2011(C) ----------- -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. KRISHNA PRASAD P.M, CHICK SEXER,REGIONAL POULTRY FARM, KUDAPPANAKUNNU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. SHIBU R,CHICK SEXER, REGIONAL POULTRY FARM, CHATHAMANGALAM,NIT P.O., KOZHIKODE BY ADVS. SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN SRI.T.K.ANANDA PADMANABHAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, DIRECTORATE OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 3. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OFFICE,PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. N.J. VARGHESE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: STU WP(C).No. 23030 of 2011(C) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.1:- TRUE COPY OF THE SPECIAL RULES G.O(P)109/04 AD DATED 14-5-2004 EXT.2:- TRUE COPY OF THE AMENDED SPECIAL RULES THAT GOT THE CONCURRENCE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION DATED 26-6-2010 EXT.3:-TRUE COPY OF THE RECOMMENDATION MADE BY THE DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY ON 18-12-2007 EXT.4:-TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 20-3-2010 EXT.5:-TRUE COPY OF THE RECOMMENDATION LETTER HAS BEEN FORWARDED BY THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER ON 24-3-2010. EXT.6:-TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATIN SUBMITTED THE FIRST PETITIONER TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY/ STU P.A TO JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.23030 of 2011-C. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 3rd October, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioners are working as Chick Sexer in the Regional Poultry Farm, Thiruvananthapuram and Kozhikode. According to them, they are eligible to be promoted to the post of Chick Sexing Expert. The qualifications for the said post are now prescribed by the amended Special Rules as evidenced by Ext.P3. However, the same has not been notified by the Government and ratified by the Kerala Public Commission. Therefore, they have approached this Court seeking appropriate directions in the matter. 2. According to the counsel for the petitioners, Exts.P4 and P6 representations submitted by the petitioners are pending consideration of the first respondent. Though they have been pending since 2010, no orders have been WP(C).No. /2011 2 passed thereon till date. 3. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 4. In view of the fact that the grievances of the petitioners are pending consideration of the first respondent, it is not necessary for me to consider the merits of the contentions at this stage. It is sufficient that Exts.P4 and P6 are directed to be considered and disposed of within a specified time. 5. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the grievances of the petitioners set out in Exts.P4 and P6 representations in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, (Judge) Kvs/- WP(C).No. /2011 3