IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 5030 of 1991 Between: 1 B.Suman S/o.B.Shanker R/o.Hyderabad. 2 K.Suhasini D/o.K.Pullaiah R/o.Hyderabad. 3 V.Kavitha D/o.V.Ramana Rao R/o.Hyderabad. 4 B.Ranga S/o.B.Sakru R/o.Hyderabad. 5 Susheel Kumar Negi S/o.B.C.Negi R/o.Hyderabad 6 N.Venkata Narayana S/o.N.Suryanarayana R/o.Hyderabad. 7 K.Ravichandra Sekhar S/o.K.Ratnakar Babu R/o.Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Registrar,A.P.University of Health Sciences Vijayawada. 2 The Principal Government Dental College Afzalgunj Hyderabad. (Dismissed for default vide court order, dt.15/7/98,GBJ and 12/8/98) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to toissue a Writ,order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to admit the petitioners to III year B.D.S. Course for the Acadamic Year 1991-92 by declaring that the petitioners are entitled to be promoted to III year B.D.S.Course for the Academic year 1991-92 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.JOGA RAO CHITTELLA Counsel for the Respondent No.: DR.Y.PADMAVATHI The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: (Per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) This petition was notified for final hearing on 13-2-2008. The learned Advocate for the petitioner was absent and, therefore, hearing was adjourned to 19-1-2009. Even on that day, the learned Advocate for the petitioner was absent and, therefore, in the interest of justice, hearing was adjourned to 20-1-2009. Even on 20-1-2009, the learned Advocate was absent and the hearing was adjourned to 22-1-2009. On that day also, the learned Advocate for the petitioner was absent and, therefore, hearing was adjourned to 23-1-2009. Even today, the learned Advocate for the petitioner is absent. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for default with no order as to costs. ________________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ _____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J 23rd January, 2009. GRR