IN THE HIOH COURT OF KARATAKA AT BNGALORE Dated this the 3rd day of Z.pril, 1998 Before: THE HOV BLE 1R. JUSTICE R.V. RAVEENDRAN Writ Petition No. 36664 of 1995 T.N. Vijayakurnar, son of T.A. Narayana, residing at & Post: Torenooru, via: Kudige, Taluk Somwarpet, District Kodagu, PIN 571 232 ..Petitioner (By Sri K, Subba Rao, Advocate) 1. The Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, represented by the Managing Director, Central Offices, K.H. Road, Bangalore — 560 027; 2. The Divisional Controller, Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Hassan Division, i-Iassan; 3. The Recruitment Committee for selection of Conductors, Hassan Division, Hassan, reoresented by the Divisional Controller, Hassan Division, Hassan ..Respondents (By Mrs. Meena Rarnachandran, Advocate) Writ Petition is filed praying to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for selection anc appointment as conductor in the Ilassan Divn. in pursuance of Advertisement No.2/95 dated 4—4—1995 and etc., This writ petition coming on for orders this day, the Court made the followin;: 2 S — 2 ORDea The petitioner claims that he apklied for selection to the post of a Candictor in the Hassan Division of ICSS.r.C. pursuant to Advertisement No • 2/95, dated 4—4—1995 • His grievance is that his case was not considered for selection. Hence, he has filed this petition seeking a direction to respondents to consider his case for selection and appointment as a Conductor in Hassan Division in pursuance of Advertisement No.2/95, dated 4-4—1995 and appoint him as a Conductor in the said Livision on the basis of merit. 2. The learned Counsel for the respondents has filed a Memo stating that in pursuance of the advertisement dated 4—4—1995, interviews were held on 24—9—1995 for 169 posts of Conductors at Hassan Division. When the selection process was in progress, the same was stayed by the State Government and some of the candidates filed itt’. Nos.3418—19/1997 seexing a direction to publish the select list and to finalise the selection. the ICS.K.A’ .C. states that this Court had directed it to take a decision either to finalise the selection of candidates who were already called a; I- ‘ I.” p Hft a ft ‘4 pftt 4o ft ph t’ ft 5 ph ft 0 Ct Z H is • tt ph ph (a ci ft ‘ft lb [ P H is a (a ft Ph C 00 n • ‘4 V Ph0’• H V U ci a ;pD bH ph a ak 4 3 ph ft P H ft it 0 a tin H 0gM. H a f5 ph ft •I!I bft ph a ‘I a is H ph ft to phfl 13 a it J ph ft Pt P H a &t t g a 0 I-. a (a it :3 t a p0 It I- is tt a a ph OCt P1 ft ftp ph gu ph •a C 00 ft I 0 0 t pta ft H .3 H P0 C ‘5 ph fl 0 1 a it U (a £. ft C ft C ph H P 1’ ft :3 ph ft a 40 za at ph (a Hf p ft (I 00. .3. F (flis R H is . a • * U C C I’ • H e3 ft (a I.’ S d (a Es Id aD P Ia 3 ft 0 a St /) t £4 LI • ii ph ph ph * •5 H a ph 02 I I K