Crl. Misc No. M 5540 OF 2011 ****** Shakil Alam vs State of Haryana Present : Mr. Hari Om Attrri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmohan Sikka, DAG Haryana ******* The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in case FIR No.945, dated 14.11.2010, registered under Sections 489B, 489C of the IPC, at Police Station Sadar District Hisar. Counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner has now been in custody since 14.11.2010 on the charge that 62 notes of the denomination of Rs.1000/- each were recovered from him. He has further argued that the present is not a case under Section 489B of the IPC but is under Section 489C of the IPC. Apart from that, he has also argued that only one witness has been examined and there are 10 more witnesses who are yet to be examined. Counsel for the respondent, on instructions from ASI Amar Singh, has accepted the factual assertions but states that since the petitioner belongs to Bihar, his antecedents could not be ascertained and there is every likelihood that he may jump bail. In my opinion, the second argument cannot be said to be meritless. In the circumstances, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner on heavy surety. Bail to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate, Hisar. However, in view of the apprehension voiced by counsel for the respondent, the trial Court is directed to take heavy surety. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) August 02, 2011. JUDGE `kk'