IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23192 of 2010 1. LALAN ROY 2. Jay Prakash Roy 3. Daijee Kumari Versus The STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.28792 of 2010 1. CHHEDNI DEVI 2. Sunita Devi 3. Usha Devi Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 03.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Shailendra Kumar, learned counsel for the complainant. In Cr. Misc. No. 23192 of 10, petitioner no.1 is son of mediator, petitioners no. 2, father of another wife and petitioner no.3, another wife of the husband. In Cr. Misc. No. 28792 of 2010, petitioner no.1 is mother-in-law and petitioners no. 2 and 3 are Nanad. It is submitted on their behalf that co-accused Sudhir Yadav was married with petitioner no.3 even then he was kidnapped and forcibly married with the informant/complainant. So, only to cast pressure, they have been made accused. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Shankarpur P.S. Case No. 27 of 2009, G.R. No. 686 of 2009 above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two 2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Madhepura subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)