IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1853 of 2005 CHANDRA MOHAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 05/ 11.12.2009 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. P.K. Bhagat, A.C. to A.A.G. 5, Mr. Neeraj Kumar, junior counsel to Mr. Dhruv Mukherjee, counsel representing the State of Jharkhand and Mr. Madhuresh Prasad, learned counsel representing the Accountant General, are present. The petitioner has filed the writ petition for a direction to the respondents to pay the dues towards his General Provident Fund together with statutory interest and penal interest. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 4, the District Superintendent of Education, Jamui that the entire admissible dues towards G.P.F. has been paid to the petitioner as per their calculation and evidence thereof has been placed at Annexure A series to the counter affidavit filed in this Court on 3.5.2006. Mr. B.R. Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner disputes the calculation of the provident fund amount and submits that the petitioner was entitled to some more additional amount. In view of the matter that the dues of the petitioner towards provident fund as per the calculation of the respondent authorities has been paid to him, no fruitful purpose would be 2 served in keeping this writ petition pending and the same is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner, if so advised, to raise his grievance before the Director, Provident Fund, Pant Bhawan, Patna within four weeks from today with supporting documents justifying his claim for additional amount of provident fund and which would be considered and disposed of by the Director, Provident Fund, Pant Bhawan, Patna within eight weeks thereof and if any further amount either towards principle or statutory interest is found payable to the petitioner the same should be paid within the same stipulated period. The writ petition stands disposed of with the directions aforesaid. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)