IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 27TH JULY 2010 / 5TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 21854 of 2010(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SELVARAJ @ SASI, S/O.PRASEES, AGED 53, KALATHANI VEEDU, CHANI, KANJIRAMKULAM P.O. BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP SRI.V.VIJULAL RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NEYYATTINKARA - 695 121 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POOVAR - 695574. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANJIRAMKULAM POLICE STATION, KANJIRAMKULAM 695 524. 4. WILY CICELET BAI, AGED 48, D/O.CISELEY BAI, SASI BHAVAN, THIRUPURAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. 5. PRADEESH RAJ, AGED 24, S/O.SELVARAJ, RESIDING AT DO. DO 695 001. 6. JAYARAJ, JAYAVILASAM, MANAVELI, THIRUPURAM P.O. 695 001 7. RANI, KURISSADI NADA, ERUVAIKONAM, OLATHANNI 695 133. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI T K VIPINDAS FOR R1-3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 21854 of 2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF GIST OF COMPROMISE REDUCED TO WRITING BY WRITER OF POLICE STATION. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.L.P.12074/08 DT.12.1.2009. EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE FIR NO.218/10 DT.12.6.2010. EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF DISCHARGE CARD DATED 17.6.10. EXT.P5 : TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DT.4.7.10 BEFORE POLICE. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL // TRUE COPY// K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 21854 of 2010 F - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 27th day of July, 2010 JUDGMENT Joseph, J. The petitioner has approached this court seeking a direction to respondents 1 to 3 to afford adequate and effective police protection to the life of the petitioner from the hands of respondents 4 to 7 and their henchmen. 2. We have already passed an interim order in this case. Though served, there is no appearance for the party respondents. 3. We heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. 4. In the circumstances of the case, we dispose of the Writ Petition by making the interim order absolute. We further make it clear that if the matter between the parties comes up before W.P.(C).No. 21854 of 2010 2 any court/forum, the said court/forum will decide the issue untrammeled by anything contained in this judgment. (K. M. JOSEPH) Judge (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS) Judge tm