IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2009 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 1376 of 2009() ----------------------------- CBCID.121/2007 of J.M.F.C.-I, MAVELIKKARA CRIME NO. 128/2006 (CBCID CR.121/07) OF KARATHIKAD POLICE STATION PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED ------------------------------------------ SIVAPRASAD @ ARAVINDAN, S/O.NARAYNAN, VETTUKULANJI THEKKETHIL VEEDU, BHARANICKAVU NORTH, KATTANAM VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE(PERUMPALLIKUTTIYIL) SRI.A.R.DILEEP RESPONDENT(S): STATE & COMPLAINANT ---------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHENGANNUR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI M.S.BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= B.A. No. 1376 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this the 25th day of March, 2009 O R D E R Petitioner who is the 1st accused in Crime No.128/2006 (CBCID CR.121/07) of the Kurathikad Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 498A and 306 IPC, seeks his enlargement on bail. The petitioner surrendered before the court on 16-2-2009. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the legal injury sustained and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. mn.