\'^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fSl NO^-S_6^ QF 2006 PETITIONER: <r .^T^ eW/ t£^s:' ^ ^ -^'' ^& H.C. Saxena, Son of Shri-' Rajendra Prasad Saxena, aged about 55 years Posted as N.M.S., in^ Primary Health .^'^y rSy~ .-'' s?* .••"' ^^y Centre, Ratanpur, Bilaspur (C.G.) District VERSUS ^- RESPONDENTS: s^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through: • the Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, >^> 8\^^ Raipur(C.G-). •A^^y .^' v-> ^ 2. Under Secretary Department of Health and Family Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI. PROHIBITION ETC. XI-HC-78 HI*IWI Sh+lish ' S^^nqRW, yTftti'is, Rdltiy VJTfca- ^ 200^ 3<l^i yath (cpfgg^sr) sn^rqirf^iw cTS|T3T1^'?Tst>*< ^ y SRTTSK H^T •BT%:ff 30.8.2006 Mr. Bhaskar Payasi, Advooat^ forthe petitioner. Mr. Satlsh Gupta, Dy. G.A. for Heard. By the instant petition, the pe 7.7.2006 (Annexure P-1) whereby Centre, Ratanpurto Primary Health Qentre, Lormi, District Bilaspur. The main ground of ohalleng|e is that the petitioner has been shown to be transferred at his own request, wher^as, the petitioner has never made any request for his transfer, therefore, the impugn^d order is passed on wrong premises. In the circumstances, learnedl to bring this anomajy to the notice of tQ make a detailed rqDresentatton to| decide the same in accordanoe wittt Adv. for the State has no objectiori. Having heard learned couns^ casfe, the petitioner is allowed to ma^ and in turn, respondent No.1 to dec after oonsidering all the grievances r^ In the meantime, till the d( operation of the impugned order dafi petitioner shall remain stayed. With the direotion aforesaid, t( Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.3p Certified copy as per ryles. t>i'iili-i<fl-i WRrf ff fei^t' <Ri<i;i<. ^ari^irsn^T the State on advance copy. itioner has challenged his transfer order dated ie has been transferred from Primary Health coureel for the petitioner submits that in order •espondent No.1, the petittonermay be allowed respondent No.1 ard in turn, he be dlrected to law, to which Shri Gupta, learned Dy. Govt. for the parties and having regard to the facts and oircumstances of the case, withtsut expressing any opinion on the merit of the a detailed representation to respondent No.1 raising all the grievances within 10 cjays from today along with copy of this petition pe the representation of the p^itioner within a period of30 days from the date of r^ceipt of representation in accordancewith law ised by the petitioner- 'cision of the representation the effect and ed 7.7.2006 (Annexure P-1) in respect of the e petition stands disposed of. '19A36 also stands disposed of. s^- ^.C.^aAO° SuA^