^v s~ BEFQRE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. fS) N0. OF 2011 / PETITIONER ^ .---* .•^. 0.' RESPONDENTS G.P. Kumbhare, aged about 50 years, son of Shri M.L. Kumbhare, R/o. Radha Bhavan, Vijay Nagar, Durg Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretaiy, Department of Mines and Mineral, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. Under Secrefary, Deptt pf Mines & Mineral, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITIONUNDERARTICLE2260FTHE CONSITUTION OF INDIA. ashok 'v- ^r HIG ©OUR'I!^R^ WrT^3ARHATBn.A^»UR WRTF PETrTION »N0.83 OF 2011 PetMloner G.P. Kumbhare Versus Respondents State of Ghhatlisgarh&Another WRITPETmONUNDERARTICLE22eOFTHECONSTmJTIONOFINDtA (S8: Hon'ble Mr. SaUsh K. Agnihtrtri, J^ Present:- Shri T.K. Tiwari.Advocateforthe petltioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Dy. Advocate General forthe Stet^ r^pondents. ORDERfORAU (Passed on 20th day ofJanuary,20ft} p,, 1. Learned counsel appearing for the p^itioner ^eete peFmi^ton or thts Court to wlthdraw thls petition vrth Uberty to take^r^^ to appropriate ftmm thatniay be ayailE^e tp^ provisions of law. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for rfher side has no objecllon. 3; It is orderedas prayed for. 4. Accordlngly, the writ petition Is dismissed as withdrawn with ttie above statect liberty. — Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^ TIiEI