THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU and THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR Dated: 15-06-2011 WRIT APPEAL No. 298 OF 2010 Between: Tirupathi Urban Development Authority, Tirupathi, rep., by its Vice- Chairman Ch. Penchal Reddy, S/o Rosi Reddy, aged 51 years, R/o Tirupathi, Chittoor District ... APPELLANT AND B. Jogiramaiah and seven others …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU and THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL No. 298 OF 2011 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Nisar Ahmad Kakru) It is submitted at the Bar by the learned counsel for the parties that in view of the subsequent event traceable to the judgment handed down by the apex Court in A. Manjula Bhashini and others vs. M.P., A.P.Women’s Cooperative Financial Corporation Limited and another[1], it would be appropriate to remit the case to the learned single Judge for reconsideration and disposal afresh. In view of the consensus arrived at, judgment impugned is set aside. The writ petition be posted after four weeks before the Bench having the roster for disposal in accordance with law. Writ appeal is allowed. VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ 15-06-2011 K. Shyleshi [1] Civil Appeal No. 3702 of 2006, dated 05-11-2008