1 chs487-10 ttm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.487 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO.131 OF 2010 Jagdish Chander R. Bansal .. Plaintiffs Vs. M/s.Karm Yogi Property Developers and Ors. .. Defendants Mr.Roshan Pinto i/b Mr.Vinit Srivastava for the plaintiffs Mr.Saral Shah a/w Mr.Sachin Mhatre for defendant no.1 CORAM : S.C.Dharmadhikari, J. DATE : December 10, 2010 P.C. : 1. This is a Chamber Summons which cannot be said to be covered by Order XI Rule XVII of the Code of Civil Procedure to the extent that the plaintiffs have not made any reference to the documents set out in prayer clause (a) of the Chamber Summons. 2. On the own showing of the defendants, it is the defendants affidavit in ’ reply to the notice of motion which makes reference to certain account. Therefore, plaintiff cannot be directed to give copies of any such account much less Income Tax Returns at this stage of the proceedings. 2 chs487-10 3. Chamber Summons is therefore misconceived and dismissed. Needless to state that the defendants would be at liberty to make an appropriate application to seek direction to the defendants for production of some documents including those referred to in prayer clause (a) of the Chamber Summons but after written statement in the suit is filed. ( S.C.Dharmadhikari, J. )