1 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3895 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. Sanjeev P. Kadam for the applicant. Mr. S.V. Marwadi i/b Ms. Sunita Sharma for respondent no.2. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 15TH FEBRUARY 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. By this application, the applicant – original complainant takes exception to the order dated 13th August 2009 passed by the Adhoc Sessions Judge at Sewree, Mumbai granting bail to the respondent no.2 and prays for cancellation of bail. 3. The respondent no.2 is implicated in an 2 offence under section 307 of the I.P.C. The respondent no.2 is not the main assailant. He did not inflict any blow on the applicant. The person who inflicted the blow on the applicant has been arrested and I am informed at the Bar that he is still in custody. The role alleged against the respondent no.2 is that he only held the collar of the applicant. The learned Sessions Judge has noted that the injury sustained by the applicant was not so serious and the applicant was also present in the Court when the application was heard. Taking all this into consideration, the learned Judge has granted bail to the respondent no.2. I find no perversity in the order of grant of bail. 4. There is no allegation that the respondent no.2 has misused the bail after his release. There is no new material on which the bail is required to be cancelled. In the circumstances, the application is rejected. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)