1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 195 OF 2010 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 161 OF 2009 Mrs. Nancy Stany Goveas ....Appellant Vs. Mr. Stany Goveas ....Respondent Ms. Susan Abraham for the appellant. Mr. N.J. D’monte for respondent. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.A..SAYED, JJ DATED:- JULY 29, 2010 P.C. In so far as prayer clause (a) of this Application is concerned, it is not in dispute that the Respondent has already paid sum of Rs. 61,000/- to the Applicant. In that sense, the said relief is worked out. 2. Insofar as relief in term of prayer clause (b) is concerned, it is peremptory direction sought against the Respondent to deposit sum of Rs. 8000/- per month of every month from July 2010. Counsel appearing for Respondent on 2 instructions of Respondent states that the Respondent shall regularly pay sum of Rs. 8000/- per month on or before 10th of every English Calender month hereafter. That assurance is accepted. In view of this assurance, no further direction is required in the context of prayer clause (b). 3. We make it clear that if Respondent commits even one default, it will be open to the Applicant to proceed against the Respondent by way of appropriate remedy including for having committed willful contempt of this Court. 4. Application disposed of on the above terms. (A.A.SAYED, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)