1 CON.PETN.98.08.sxw JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 98 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3079 OF 2006 Manoj Kumar Mishra. ... Petitioner. V/s. Kushaldas B. Patel. ... Respondents. Mr. N.M. Ganguli for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 18th FEBRUARY 2011. P.C. :- The Contempt Petition is dismissed few minutes back. Learned Counsel Mr. Ganguli requested for restoration of the same. Since the request is made during the course of the day, the Petition is restored to the file of the Court. It is taken up immediately for hearing. 2. Heard learned Counsel Mr. Ganguli for the Petitioner. According to learned Counsel Mr. Ganguli, by order dated 11th March 2008, Respondent was directed to pay to the Petitioner monies as per Section 17(B) of the Industrial Disputes Act. Perusal of the order says that Motion taken out by the Petitioner in Writ Petition No. 3079 of 2006 is made absolute. 2 CON.PETN.98.08.sxw Perused prayer clause (a) of the Notice of Motion. By granting relief in terms of the said Motion, the Petitioner is entitled to receive Rs.4,200/- per month being the last wages drawn. 3. In my view, the order pertains to payment of monies. The Respondent is liable to pay the monies as per the order. The order can be executed. Non payment of monies cannot be treated as contempt of Court. The Petition cannot be entertained. The Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (R.Y. GANOO, J.)