THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 23750 OF 2008 Dated: 30-08-2011 Between: J. Renuka Bai ... PETITIONER AND The Inspector of Police Law & Order), Gandhinagar Police Station, Gandhinagar, Secunderabad and four others ... RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 23750 OF 2008 ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks directions by way of mandamus to declare the action of the Inspector of Police (Law and Order), Gandhinagar Police Station, Secunderabad, the 1st respondent herein in interfering with the civil dispute which exists between herself and the 5th respondent with regard to the house property covered by plot No.102, H.No.6-3-237 situate at New Bhoiguda, Secunderabad as arbitrary and illegal. It is the case of the petitioner that she is the owner and possessor of the aforesaid house having purchased the same from one I. Rama Swamy by way of a registered sale deed, dated 28-12-2007 vide document No.2244 of 2007. It is her grievance that though she is in possession of the property in question by virtue of her purchase, there is interference by the police at the instance of the 5th respondent. The 1st respondent herein filed a detailed counter affidavit stating that the 5th respondent approached the police by way of filing a complaint on 17-04-2008 alleging that though she is in possession of the house in question along with her mother, the petitioner claiming to have purchased the same is trying to enter into the premises illegally and requested to protect their possession. It is further stated that after looking into the contents of the complaint, the 5th respondent was advised to seek redressal in a competent civil Court as the dispute is of civil nature, but no action was initiated by him. It is stated in categorical terms that the police are not interfering with the civil dispute and neither the petitioner nor her sons was summoned to the police station at any point of time. Inasmuch as the allegations made by the petitioner that the police are interfering with the civil dispute and summoning her to the police station are specifically denied by the respondents by filing a counter affidavit and in the absence of any further material to prove the same, it is not possible for this Court to examine as to whether there is any interference by the police. While placing the above averments made by the respondent – police in the counter affidavit on record, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the title of the petitioner or of the 5th respondent. R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 30-08-2011 ks