C.W.P. No. 11777 of 2011 [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 11777 of 2011 Date of Decision: July 11,2011 Rajinder Kumar ............................................. Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ................... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Tribhawan Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioner at the outset does not challenge the order dated 11.4.2011 (Annexure P3) for re- fixation of his pay. However, he argues that the recovery of `1,45,812/- from the pay of the petitioner is not on the basis of any misrepresentation and fraud. Notice of motion. On asking of the Court, Mr. Puneet Gupta, Addl. A.G. Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. C.W.P. No. 11777 of 2011 [ 2 ] While relying on the judgment of this Court in Budh Ram and others v. State of Haryana and others 2009 (3) PLR 511 the writ petition is being disposed of by giving a direction to the respondents not to make any recovery in pursuance to the order dated 23.6.2011 (Annexure P4). However, if on verification of the facts the respondents come to the conclusion that the petitioner was guilty of misrepresentation and fraud in wrong fixation of pay, they shall be at liberty to get the order reviewed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 11.7.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE