-:1:- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION (LODG.) NO. 1425 OF 2007 PETITION (LODG.) NO. 1425 OF 2007 PETITION (LODG.) NO. 1425 OF 2007 Sunil J. Shetty & Anr. ... Petitioners. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents. Mr. N.B. Pawaskar for the Petitioners. Mr. P.J. Jadhav, AGP for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND : J.N. PATEL AND : J.N. PATEL AND K.U. K.U. K.U. CHANDIWAL,JJ. CHANDIWAL,JJ. CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 14TH JULY, 2008. : 14TH JULY, 2008. : 14TH JULY, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . Heard. 2. The Petitioner has approached this Court under extra-ordinary jurisdiction for enforcing certain rights in respect of the contract awarded to him to run a canteen in the premises of J.J. Hospital. A copy of the agreement dated 1st May 2007 is annexed to the Petition at Exhibit B. 3. We have gone through the petition. Apart from the fact that the Petitioner is seeking relief based on contract, there are disputes on questions of facts raised in the petition which cannot be entertained in a Writ Petition nor this case falls within the exception in which the Court in its discretion may entertain petition under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India. -:2:- 4. Therefore, we do not find any reason as to why the petition should not revert to the alternate remedy available under law. We, therefore, dismiss the Petition with liberty to the Petitioner to seek alternate remedy. 5. The Petition is dismissed. (J.N. (J.N. (J.N. PATEL,J.) PATEL,J.) PATEL,J.) (K.U. (K.U. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) CHANDIWAL,J.) CHANDIWAL,J.)