IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9615 of 2009 1. KAMLESH KUMAR @ PAPPU LAL, son of late Indradeo Lal 2. Santosh Pandey @ Santosh Ojha, son of Sri Rma Dular Pandey Both are residents of village-Pokharahan, P.S.-Bagen Gola, District-Buxar------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that there may be a case under section 353 of the Indian Penal Code which only is non-bailable but followed with no violence. It was not a case under section 384 of the Indian Penal Code as no delivery was there. Police also did not submit chargesheet under section 384 of the Indian Penal Code, though incident is said to be reported due to not allowing the account holder for withdrawal of the money within the prescribed time (working period). However, finding no violence of the nature in which petitioners arrest can be justified. Prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Brahampur P.S. case no.123 of 2008, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )