j. ^1 1.2 l,-> IN THE HIGH COURT QF JUDICATURE, AT BILASPUR (C.G.) y W.P.lM0.33o62005/ Petitioner Ram Sahu S/o Manglu aged about 56 years, R/o - village Fulwari, P.0. Newari, Tah. Simga, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) V/s Respondents /^w/ ^y/' ^^.^A / /^-'^y ../:^. .^^' • ^^ <"y ^' State of C.G. Through Secretary Department of Water Resources DKS Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 1 2y/.The Chief Engineer Mahanadi Jalasaya Priyojna Telibandha Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) The Sub Divisional Officer Water Management Sub Division No. 7 Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 4>/ The Executive Engineer > Water Management Division No. 2, Baloda Bazar Distt. 'Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLB 226 /227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. FOR ISSUNCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURB OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI BTC. OR ANY QTHER DIRECTION (Sl OR •c..' v'",.€^ ^r"-. ORDER (S) _^~ :^^'¥y^m^ © HI€HCOURT OF JUMCATURE CHHATTISeARH: BILASPUR Singl®Bench: Hon'ble Shri Sattsh JC. Agnihotri. J. W. P. No. 3306 of 2005 Petitioner : Aoju Ram Sahu Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh & others Mr. Ashok Patil, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Arun Soc, ^vernment Advocate for the re^»ondents/State. ^assed on 3rdt day of January, 2007) L Learned counsel cppearing for the petitioner submits that the petitjoner was appointed as daily rated employee on compassionate basis, pursucmt to death of his father late Manglu Ram, who w<xs also daily rated empbyee, working as Mate' Engagement of the petitioner as daily rated employee was discontinued by the order dated 31.12,2000 (4nnexure P/l) on the ground that services of tiie daily rated employees were 'no longer required' in view of fincxncial constraint and non- availability of the work for daity rated emptoyees. Accordingty, servicss of the petitioner was discontinued with one month's salary in lieu of one month's notice by -rfie impugned order dated 31.1.2000 (Annexure P/l). 2. The petitioner has filed this petition ^eking a direction of this Court- to reinstate the petitioner in ^rvice up to 60 years of aqe. 3. It is wett settled principle of law that the daily wagers, temporary or ad hoc employees have no right to the post ^eking r^gutarization and grant of regutor poy scaie, if their appointments were de-hors the constitutional scheme or the rules inade under the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner has no ri9ht to continue/re9uhrize or reinstate on the post in view of catena of decisions laid down by the Supreme Court. LL The writ petition is accordingly disniissed. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Babtu