CW1682/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1682/2010 Balu Ram Chaudhary Vs. Cent Bank Home Finance Limited Date of Order ::: 29.11.2010 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Prashant Chahar for Shri Biri Singh Sinsinwar, Counsel for petitioner Shri Satish Bijrania, Counsel for respondents #### By the Court:- Although matter came up for orders on application for vacation of stay order, but with consent of both parties matter was heard finally. Learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that petitioner had taken a loan of Rs.3,00,000/- from respondent Bank in year 2001 and there-against paid a sum of Rs.2,14,086/- in installments and maturity amount of fixed deposit to the tune of Rs.99,825/- was adjusted by them against said loan. Thus, in total, an amount of Rs.3,13,911/- has been deposited. Still, respondents are further demanding a sum of Rs.3,82,403/-. In similar circumstances, respondents have settled loan amount of one Sushil Kumar Jain, whose writ petition has been dismissed having been rendered infructuous by this Court. Against demand of Rs.5,88,818/-, said Shri Sushil Kumar Jain was required to deposit only a sum of CW1682/2010 // 2 // Rs.2,90,000/-. Learned counsel also invited attention of court towards similar loan account of Nijamuddin, who took a loan of Rs.3,00,000/- from respondent Bank on the same day on which petitioner was advanced loan and in whose case also, the amount of interest was waived. Therefore, learned counsel submits that petition may be disposed of directing respondent Bank to settle his loan account on same pattern. Learned counsel for respondent has submitted that if petitioner approaches respondent Bank, they would consider his request in accordance with rules and instructions in the subject. Having regard to facts of this case, this petition is disposed of requiring petitioner to enter into negotiation with respondent Bank, who shall consider his case on the lines in which loan accounts of Nijamuddin and Sushil Kumar were settled and, pass appropriate order settling loan account of petitioner. Interim order passed by this court in present matter would continue till one month after date of such order settling loan account of petitioner is passed by respondent Bank. Petition is disposed of. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//