IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH OCTOBER 2010 / 21ST ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 15064 of 2010(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. JOHNY DEVASSY, SON OF LONA DEVASSY, PAROKKARAN HOUSE, KARUKUTTY.P.O, MAMBRA, KARUKUTTY. 2. THOMAS DEVASSY, SON OF LONA DEVASSY, PAROKKARAN HOUSE, KARUKUTTY.P.O, MAMBRA, KARUKUTTY. BY ADV. SRI.T.P.SAJAN SRI.M.MOHAMED NAVAZ SRI.L.ALOYSIUS THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI. 2. TAHASILDAR, ALUVA TALUK, ALUVA. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KARUKUTTY VILLAGE. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. DILEEP MOHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.15064 OF 2010(G) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners submit that they acquired a total extent of 68 cents in R.S. No.3/6 and 17.5 cents in R.S. No.10/5 of Karukutty Village, by virtue of the provisions in Ext.P2 Will executed by his deceased father. According to the petitioners, when they applied for mutation of the properties, the property in R.S. No.10/5 alone was mutated in their favour. In so far as 68 cents acquired by them in R.S.No.3/6 is concerned, orders were not passed, for the reason that 31.162 cents were mutated in favour of respondents 4 and 5. For rectification of the above, petitioners submitted Ext.P6 to the 2nd respondent and the 2nd respondent inturn called for A-forms from the 3rd respondent. It is thereafter there was no progress in the matter and it is in these circumstances the writ petition is filed. 2. Essentially therefore, what is sought for by the petitioner is correction of a mistake, which is a matter for the 2nd respondent to consider in the light of resurvey records and the records relating to mutation. It was therefore that the 2nd respondent WPC.No. 15064/2010 :2 : called for A-Forms from the 3rd respondent. In that view of the matter what is required is that the 3rd respondent should make available A-Forms to the 2nd respondent and on receipt thereof, 2nd respondent shall consider Ext.P6 with notice to the petitioner and respondents 4 and 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing that on the production of a copy of the judgment, the 3rd respondent will make available the A-Forms concerning 68 cents of properties situated in R.S.No.3/6 of Karukutty Village, out of which 31.162 cents has been mutated in favour of respondents 4 and 5, to the 2nd respondent. This the 3rd respondent shall do within 4 weeks of receipt of a copy of the judgment. On receipt of the above the 2nd respondent shall consider the matter as indicated above with notice to the parties and as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks thereafter. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. 15064/2010 :3 :