IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13172 of 2009 SARYUG PRASAD, son of Late Prayag Mahto, resident of Mohalla Uttari Koiri Tola, Hilsa, P.S. Hilsa, District Nalanda ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Additional Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Gaya. 5. Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Department, Gaya. 6. Executive Engineer, Waterways Division, Gaya. 7. Treasury Officer, Hilsa, Nalanda. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 8.10.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader no.3 appearing for the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 28th of February, 2009 as Irrigation Revenue Inspector from the office of the Executive Engineer, Waterways Division, Gaya (respondent no.6), save and except the amount equivalent to earned leave, no pensionary benefits have been paid till date despite representation given to the concerned authorities. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State submits that in case the petitioner files a fresh representation stating the details of his unpaid claims distinctly, the same would be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims 2 as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Executive Engineer (respondent no.6). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the respondent no.6 shall consider each of the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that upon consideration the amount found admissible with statutory interest, if any, could be paid to the petitioner without delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)