1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR MCA (Arbitration) No.670/2010 [M/s. Bigwig Education Institute .vrs. M/s. HCL Infosystems Limited] ................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : JULY 01, 2011. Heard Advocate Shri Sambre for the applicant and Advocate Shri De for the non-applicant. Perused arbitration clause. The parties have agreed to jurisdiction of Courts at Delhi. Contention before this Court is, entire cause of action has arisen at Nagpur and only because stamp paper is purchased in New Delhi, the Courts at Delhi cannot have the jurisdiction. Judgments, to show that parties by consent cannot confer jurisdiction, are being pressed into service. Advocate Shri De points out that non- applicant has got its registered office at New Delhi. In view of this position, the agreement between the parties cannot be said to confer jurisdiction upon a Court which has none. Precedents 2 being pressed into service are, therefore, not attracted. Application filed before this court is misconceived. Hence, present application stands disposed of. The parties are at liberty to approach the Court at Delhi. JUDGE Gulande