1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.04.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Crl.R.C.(MD)No.302 of 2011 and M.P.(MD).No.2 of 2011 R.Balasubramanian ... Petitioner Vs. V.Gurusekar ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w. 401 of Cr.P.C. against the order dated 23.09.2010 in Cr.M.P.No.1793 of 2010 in S.T.C.No.44 of 2010 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Natham, Dindigul. For Petitioner : M/s. T.Lajapathi Roy O R D E R The revision petitioner is the accused in S.T.C.No.44 of 2010 on the file of the Court of District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Natham, Dindigul and he filed Cr.M.P.No.1793 of 2010 for discharge and the same was dismissed and challenging the vires of the same, he preferred this revision petition. 2. The Honourable Supreme Court of India in the decisions reported in (2004) 7 SCC 338 in Adalat Prasad v. Rooplal Jindal and (2004) 13 SCC 324 in Subramanium Sethuraman v. State of Maharashtra, held that discharge from summons case is not contemplated. 3. In view of the ratio laid down in the decisions, this Court finds no infirmity in the impugned order dated 23.09.2010 passed in Cr.M.P.No.1793 of 2010 in S.T.C.No.44 of 2010 by the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Natham, Dindigul. Hence, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law. Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Natham, Dindigul +1CC TO Mr.T.Layapathi Roy, Advocate, SR.No.13869 akv GH : 29.04.2011 : 1P/3C Crl.R.C.(MD)No.302 of 2011 12.04.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/