FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1402 OF 2007 The State of Maharashtra Vs. Sandip S.Jeste. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders. of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mrs.A.A. Mane for the State. Mr. Raja Thakare i/by N.D. Jaywant for the Respondent. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 11/9/2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard both sides. 2. The matter involves arguable points of law. The Doctor in question has performed an operation of MTP but part of foetus admeasuring 30 cm. has left behind. He has not taken care to see that the entire foetus was removed. This could easily have been done by him at the first instance. He has not removed the same even after two days when the patient came again with the complaint of pain in abdomen. Hence, leave granted. office to number the appeal. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)