IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3079 of 2009 Date of decision: 26.05.2009. Kashmiri Lal and another ...Petitioners Versus Smt. Ishwar Devi and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. D.S.Bali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Salil Bali, Advocate for the petitioners ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners would be content and interests of justice would be served if a direction is issued to the learned Trial Court to record a finding that the suit is barred by res-judicata. The grant of a direction of that category is not envisioned by law. The controversy about whether the suit pending before the learned Trial Court is, infact, barred by res-judicata or not is yet to be disposed of by the learned Trial Court. The petitioner is, accordingly, relegated to the learned Trial Court, which shall dispose of the plea aforementioned in accordance with law. The petition shall stand disposed of accordingly. Copy of the order be given to the learned counsel for the petitioners under the signatures of the Special Secretary. May 26, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge