IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Revision 1728 of 2007 DATE OF DECISION : DECEMBER 8, 2008 AMARJIT & ORS. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS RAM PARKASH & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. BD Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. HS Gill, Sr. Advocate, withdraw Mr. RK Dhiman, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Shilesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) It transpires that the petitioners were summoned to stand trial vide order dated 22.7.2005. It seems that an application was filed praying for discharge of the petitioners. The application has been dismissed vide impugned order dated 17.8.2007. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 states that at the stage of service of notice of acusation, the petitioners would have the right to refer to the preliminary evidence and raise all the contentions. Considering the stand of respondent No.1, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to raise all the contentions available to them at the stage of service of notice of accusation. Criminal Revision 1728 of 2007 2 Observations made in impugned order dated 17.8.2007 shall not be taken into account as opinion on merits of the case. December 8, 2008 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE