1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3314/2010 ( Chainlal S. Rane -: VERSUS :- Nanda C. Rane ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri Charlewar, Adv. for petitioner. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JULY 28, 2010. Heard Adv. Shri Charlewar for petitioner. The learned counsel contends that in earlier round of litigation this Court has found that maintenance of Rs.4,500/- per month to be jut and proper. In this situation, when there is no change of circumstances only because of the order of this Court by which the grant of maintenance was reduced from Rs.6,000/- to Rs.4,000/- the respondent – wife filed an application for enhancement and the Trial Court has granted that by enhancing the amount from Rs.4,000/- to Rs.6,000/- per month. Learned counsel invites attention to the statement in 2010 ground 1 (d) of writ petition to explain salary structure of the petitioner. The petitioner has not produced any salary certificate before this Court. When enhancement was sought, he moved an application for cancellation of maintenance already 2 granted before Trial Court alleging immoral relationship. However, he did not file any salary certificate to show that his salary was not enhanced. In this situation, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter in writ jurisdiction. However, considering the fact that proceedings is of year 2008, the same is expedited and Trial Court shall attempt to decide the same as early as possible. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Tambaskar.