1 35 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7395/2006. Shiv Dayal Vs. Vardhman Mahaveer Open University & Ors. Date of Order :: 2nd July 2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. Hemant Kumar for Mr. Rakesh Arora, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Joshi, for the respondents. ..... BY THE COURT: The subject matter of this writ petition as noted while issuing notices on 20.12.2006 is that the petitioner, prosecuting Two Years Degree Course of B.Ed. by correspondence, was required to attend contact camp each year; that for the first year, he was duly informed by the University to attend such camp but no information with regard to second contact camp convened in the subsequent year was given to him and, therefore, he could not attend the same; that the respondent issued him permission letter to appear in examination scheduled to commence from 24.12.2006 but subsequently cancelled the same by the impugned communication dated 13.12.2006, for the reason of his having not attended the said second contact camp. While issuing notices on 20.12.2006, this Court directed that the petitioner may be provisionally permitted to appear in 2 the B.Ed. Examination of Second Year scheduled to commence from 24.12.2006 onwards and his result was, however, directed not to be declared till his attending the requisite contact camp as and when next convened by the respondent-University. Learned counsel for the parties submit ad idem that after passing of the said order, the petitioner was permitted to appear in the Second Year Examination and did also attend the contact camp convened by the University; and his result has already been declared and practically this writ petition has become infructuous. Though in view of the submissions as made by the learned counsel for the parties, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition; however, for clarification, it appears appropriate to allow this writ petition to the extent of setting aside the impugned communication dated 13.12.2006. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed only to the extent indicated above; the impugned communication dated 13.12.2006 stands quashed; and the result declared by the respondent-University shall obviously govern the petitioner. No costs. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. Mohan/