THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.31504 of 2011 ORDER: The action of respondent No.2, in calling the petitioner and his family members to the police station, and insisting that they settle their civil disputes with respondent No.3, is questioned in this Writ Petition as being arbitrary and illegal. The petitioner’s specific case is that there are civil disputes pending between him and the third respondent; and the second respondent was siding with the third respondent, and was exerting pressure on him to settle the matter with the third respondent. In his counter affidavit the second respondent would deny ever having called the petitioner to the police station. He would submit that no complaint has been lodged much less registered in t h e Porumamilla Police Station, Y.S.R. District against the petitioner; the question of he being called to the Porumamilla Police Station did not arise; and the Writ Petition has presumably been filed more as a precautionary measure apprehending that a complaint would be lodged against him. In view of the assertions in the counter affidavit that no complaint has been registered against the petitioner, and as respondent No.2 would specifically deny having called the petitioner to the police station, I see no reason to delve further into the matter. Suffice to record the submissions made on behalf of respondent No.2 that neither was the petitioner called to the Porumamilla Police Station, YSR District nor has any complaint been lodged against him. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, closed. However, in the circumstances, without costs. RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J Date:21.12.2011 usd