IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14579 of 2011 1. Adhik Yadav 2. Daro Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3 24.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioners that they persuaded the complainant to make an agreement between the complainant and one Ashok Yadav for purchase of the 14 bullocks worth Rs. 67,951/-. Bullocks were taken but, Ashok Yadav did not make the payment. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that only the accusation against the petitioner is that he introduced Ashok Yadav with the complainant. Considering the fact that only beneficiaries is Ashok Yadav, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest 2 or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamui in connection with Complaint Case No. 751-C/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)