1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COURT RECEIVER’S REPORT NO.213 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.543 OF 2000 Smt. Prafullata R. Varhadi .... Plaintiff. V/s Smt. Pushpalata C. Chury & Ors. .... Defendants. Mr. Uday Warunjikar for the plaintiff. Mr. P.G. Lad for defendant Nos. 1 and 2. Mrs. U.S. Srivastava, 2 nd Assistant to the Court Receiver. CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 29TH JULY, 2009 P.C:- 1. By an order dated 10 th July, 2009, this Court had directed MHADA to file their reply in respect to prayer clause (a) of the Court Receiver’s Report within a period of two weeks from the date of the said order. By the said order, prayer clause (b) of the Court Receiver’s report was granted. No affidavit in reply has been filed by MHADA. None appears on behalf of MHADA. 2. Counsel for plaintiff and defendant have no objection 2 if the Court Receiver’s Report is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) except the bracketed portion and in terms of prayer clause (d). 3. Accordingly, Court Receiver’s Report is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) except the bracketed portion and in terms of prayer clause (d). (V.M. KANADE, J)