IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WENESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No. 335 OF 2010 Between: N.Surapa Raju and another … Petitioners And Tulasi Ram Dass and another … Respondents This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.335 of 2010 ORDER:- The petitioners filed W.P.No.16586 of 2009 against the respondents complaining that they are not permitting them to prosecute B.Tech course. They have also filed W.P.Nos.27582 and 28067 of 2008, feeling aggrieved by the orders of suspension passed against them. On 10.11.2009, W.P.No.27582 and 28067 of 2008 were allowed and the orders impugned therein, were set aside. The W.P.No.16586 of 2009 was dismissed as infructuous, in view of the orders passed in the other two writ petitions. This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents have not declared the results of the petitioners and thereby violated the orders of this court in W.P.No.16586 of 2009. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The contempt case is totally misconceived. W.P.No.16586 of 2009 was dismissed on a representation made on behalf of the petitioners to the effect that in view of the orders passed in other two writ petitions referred to above, no further orders are necessary. It is just not understandable as to how a contempt case would arise out of such an order. The Contempt case is accordingly closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J 10th March 2010 lmv