IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (St No. 2-^ f2/ OF 2010. PETITIONERS o^^l^g^ ^^S£E- : 1. Ude Singh Jurri, S/o. Shri Mainu Ram Jurri, aged about 60 years, Head Master, Govt. Primary School Kohkatola, Block Narharpur, DistrictKanker (C.G.) Bhagbali Partiti, S/o. Dhanesh Ram Partiti, aged about 53 years, Head Master, Govt. Middle School Lilwapahar, Block Narharpur, District Kanker (C. G.) Sahdeo Ram Kunjam, S/o. Hadi Rajn Kunjam., aged about 50 years, Head Master, Govt. Primary School Pandripani, Block Narharpur, District Kanker (C. G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Kanker, Disfrict Kanker (C. G.) Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension, Kanker, District Kanker (C. G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Narharpur, District Kanker (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COyRTOF CHHATT1SGARH : BIL^RUR PETITIONERS RESPCWDENTS WRrTPETITIGN(S)NG.23120F201Q Ude Singh Jum & Othere Versus Stafe ofehhattisgarh & Others 0<Vrtt PetitjQn ynclerArticlfr226 qfthe Constitution of india) SSingta Berich : Hon'bte Shn SatislrK. Agnihotri, J. Presenf- $hri Somkant Verma, 'Advocata fbr the petitioners. ShnPX.Bhaduti,Paijiet^l..auvYerfoFl:heState. .2. 4. Gowri •JJ J ' i' rTijK^'-si^rT^qqdiim^ QRDERCORAU (PasssdQnlR(s6"dayof!y!ay,2810) Learned counsel appearingi for. Ihe petitioners submite thal the petitipnera were appointect irutially as Assisfant Teach^r pn a fixed pay on probation. A rc<^pleti0n gfttejrtespecUve prpBatjpn^^p^ petHibriera vwre granted (^ular pay scale. to^ submits that the issue inrolveil in the casa is ;asto whslher the petitionera are entitled toi.regutar^pay scale w appointFnentaraflercoffl^^on of^i'ot^rtion {tefiod. Learnedwyn^lfoFthe.paryesjoirt^submKthatthei^yeinvoh^ herein Was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administr^ Tribuna!,Jabalpur;(^Sh6rt^aqr^inOA.No,2745 (M^l^ yaclUandSSoifterevs.SteteofMft&offie^.v^ the sinnilartysituatedteacheraflreerrtitledtoregularpayscEdew.e.tthe (late of initial appointnient. The matter was taten up to the Supreme C6iiirt.Th&appi8alw£s^(iismissedtythe;Suprem6Court,uplioldingthe decision crf the" Tribunal- tc> the efiect that the Teachers/Assistant TeacHere are ertitletf t6 regular pay scale frdm date oT initial appointment,, : : .,; '...1; •':''..: : • ' ;• ' 1' In view of the above submjssions made t>y leamed counsel for the partjes, the petitiQners are granted liberty to fflake representatipns tothe respondent authoriti^, ifsd advised, toconsiderlheir cascs and pass appnyriat&onieriOnitsgwnrneritandm^^i^^ the order passed by the SAT iri Atec ute subsequently Gonfirmed by^the Suprerne Court jn Specia! Leave Petjtion (CiviI)No; 6892/93 bysrtleryated 3-1-1994. Accortjingly.thewritpetitiorii'sdisposedpf. ^^i^_ ^^^^•^'k- :^: ^^ti^^i:~S^'!i3^£Ssy':^