- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATIONS NOS.11143/2003, 586/2004, 8870/2004, 8869/2004, 7562/2005, 7563/2005, 3904/2006, 7225/2006, 2100/2008 and 7514/2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1717/2003 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11143/2003 Gulabrao Baburao Deokar. ..Applicant.. Versus Additional Registrar, High Court of Bombay & others. ..Respondents.. Shri D.P. Palodkar, Advocate for applicant. Shri G.N. Chincholkar, Amicus Curiae for respondent no.1. Shri K.B. Choudhary, AGP for the State. Shri A.G. Talhar, Advocate for respondent no.9. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CIVIL APPLICATION NO.586/2004 Jalgaon District Central Cooperative Bank at Jalgaon. ..Applicant.. Versus - 2 - State of Maharashtra & others. ..Respondents.. Shri A.G.Talhar, Advocate for applicant. Shri K.B. Choudhary, AGP for the State. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8870/2004 Aurangabad District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. ..Applicant.. Versus Hon’ble High Court Bench at Aurangabad and others. ..Respondents.. Shri D.S. Bagul, Advocate for applicant. Shri K.B. Choudhary, AGP for the State. Shri G.N. Chincholkar, Amicus Curiae for respondent no.1. Shri Bhushan Kulkarni, Advocate for original res.no.5 in WP. Shri A.G. Talhar, Advocate for original res.no.9 in WP. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8869/2004 The Aurangabad District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. ..Applicant.. Versus High Court, Bench at Aurangabad and others. ..Respondents.. Shri D.S. Bagul, Advocate for applicant. Shri G.N. Chincholkar, Amicus Curiae for respondent no.1. - 3 - Shri K.B.Choudhary, AGP for the State. Shri Bhushan Kulkarni, Advocate for original res.no.5 in WP. Shri A.G. Talhar, Advocate for original res.no.9 in WP. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7562/2005 Additional Registrar, High Court, Aurangabad. ..Applicant.. Versus Commissioner of Cooperation Department, Mumbai and others. ..Respondents.. Shri S.A. Gaike, party – in - person. Shri K.B. Choudhary, AGP for the respondent no.1, State and its authorities. Shri G.N. Chincholkar, Amicus Curiae. Shri R.N. Dhorde, Advocate h/f Shri R.L.Kute, Advocate for respondent nos.8 to 25. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7563/2005 Additional Registrar, High Court, Aurangabad. Versus Commissioner of Cooperation Department, Mumbai and others. Shri S.A. Gaike, party – in – person. Shri K.B. Choudhary, AGP for the respondent no.1, State and its authorities. Shri G.N. Chincholkar, Amicus Curiae. Shri D.S. Bagul, Advocate for original res.no.2 in WP. - 4 - Shri Bhushan Kulkarni, Advocate for original res.no.5 in WP. Shri A.G.Talhar, Advocate for original res.no.9 in WP. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3904/2006 The Aurangabad District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. ..Applicant.. Versus High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, and others. ..Respondents.. Shri D.S. Bagul, Advocate for applicant. Shri G.N. Chincholkar, Amicus Curiae for respondent no.1. Shri K.B. Choudhary, AGP for the State and its authorities. Shri Bhushan Kulkarni, Advocate for original res.no.5 in WP. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7225/2006 Sadashiv Ambadas Gaike. ..Applicant.. Versus Additional Registrar, High Court, Aurangabad & others. ..Respondents.. Applicant – party – in – person. Shri Bhushan Kulkarni, Advocate for original res.no.5 in WP. Shri U.M. Bhopshetty, Advocate for respondent no. Shri A.G. Talhar, Advocate for original res.no.9 in WP. Shri K.B. Choudhary, AGP for the State and its authorities. Shri K.C. Sant, Advocate for original res.no.6 in WP. - 5 - Shri A.V. Patil, Advocate for original res.nos.11 to 33. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2100/2008 Deepak Kaduba Dhumal & others. ..Applicants.. Versus The Hon’ble High Court and others. ..Respondents.. Shri S.B. Talekar, Advocate for applicants. Shri G.N. Chincholkar, Amicus Curiae for respondent no.1. Shri K.B. Choudhary, AGP for the State and its authorities. Shri D.S. Bagul, Advocate for original res.no.2 in WP. Shri Bhushan Kulkarni, Advocate for original res.no.5 in WP. Shri K.C. Sant, Advocate for original res.no.6 in WP. Shri A.G. Talhar, Advocate for original res.no.9 in WP. Shri A.V. Patil, Advocate for original res.nos.11 to 33 in WP. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7514/2008 Sadashiv Ambadas Gaike. ..Applicant.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ..Respondents.. Applicant – party – in – person. Shri G.N. Chincholkar, Amicus Curiae. Shri K.B. Choudhary, AGP for the State and its authorities. Shri D.S. Bagul, Advocate for original res.no.2 in WP. - 6 - Shri Bhushan Kulkarni, Advocate for original res.no.5 in WP. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ..... CORAM: P.V. HARDAS & A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE: 14.08.2009 PER COURT : Heard learned counsel for the parties. Today, by a separate judgment, we have dismissed Writ Petition No. 1717/2003. In view of dismissal of the writ petition, these civil applications do not now survive for consideration and the same are accordingly dismissed. Needless to state that all interim / stay orders, if any granted by this Court in these applications, stand vacated. (A.V. Potdar, J.) (P.V. Hardas, J.) ndk/c1480939