1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 240 OF 2011 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.211 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.564 OF 2010 Shweta C. Koshti ...Petitioner Versus The Shipping Corporation of India & Others ...Respondents Mr.R.K.Mendadkar for Petitioner. Mr. Agnel Carnerio i/b.Mulla & Mulla for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR & R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED:- 27th JUNE, 2011. P.C. 1. Although we are not impressed by the explanation offered by the Advocate for petitioner, in the interest of justice, as the litigant should not suffer for the mistake of the Advocate, we allow the motion in terms of prayer clause (a), on the condition that Advocate on record for the petitioner, personally shall pay cost quantified at 2 Rs.1000/- (Rupees One Thousand Only), to High Court Legal Services Authority, within two weeks from today. 2. In terms of this order, the Notice of Motion No.211 of 2011 is restored to the file and taken up for hearing forthwith, by consent. 3. The said notice of motion is for recalling the Order dated 16th July, 2010, on which date the writ petition was dismissed for default. Since we have already imposed cost to be paid by the Advocate on record for the petitioner, in the interest of justice, we allow this motion as well, but on condition that no request for keeping back or adjournment on any count, at the instance of the petitioner, in the restored writ petition will be entertained on future dates. 4. Restored writ petition be listed for admission on 14th July, 2011. (R.Y.GANOO, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)