1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr.MMO No. 125 of 2011 . Date of decision: 14.12.2011. 1. Smt. Veena Sood wife of Sh. Ramesh Chander through her G.P.A. Sh. Ramesh Chander, 2. Sh. Ramesh Chander son of Sh. Parma Nand, Both residents of Stokes Place, Shimla-2. ......Petitioners. Versus Sh. Ramesh Kumar Sood son of late Sh. Saran Dass Sood, resident of 8, The Mall, Shimla, H.P. ......Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioners : Mr. Satyen Vaidya, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Y.P.Sood and Mr. Romesh Verma, Advocates. Kuldip Singh , Judge ( Oral). The learned counsel for the respondent has stated that accusation has been put to both the petitioners on 03.11.2011 by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shimla. The petition has been filed for setting aside summoning order dated 30th December, 2009. The accusation has been put to petitioners for offence punishable under Section 500 IPC, therefore, now the petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. ( Kuldip Singh ), December 14, 2011 Judge. (Krt) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Judgment ?