0 WLk BtEW."" ^ f^^ao^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. S.NO. s^o-^ <° /2006 PETITIONER "\ ^ .^ ..•^/" N^/../] / ^^/ €^"/ ./%'* 4^ '<<y" RESPONDENTS Sanjay Kumar Kashyap S/o- Shri Shahadram Kashyap Aged about ^T'years, R/o- Village - Ghuru, Post Tifra, Biiaspur District, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS »> .<*.c J^\ r^ > ^. ^J^ ^ State ofChhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department ofTribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Additional Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Bilaspur,District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Collector, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) OV>1£> \tl WRFT PFTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTIQN OF INDIA 'v HISj^COiaTOFJVOICATURE^HHAmSSARH: BII.ASPUR Single Bench: Hwi'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W.P.(s)No. 5096 of 2006 Petitioner Sanjay Kumar Kashyap Versus Respondents State of Chhatl'isgarh A others Bablu Mr. Anand Kumar Tiwari, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. V.V.5. AAoorthy, Oeput/ Advocate Seneral with Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Sovernment Advocate for •the reqiondents/State. OR D E R (7th November, 20)6) 1. Mr. V.V.S. Moorthy, leamed Deputy Advocate Seneral with Mrs. Anju Ahuja, learned Deputy Sovernment Advocate appearing for the respondents/State submits that the petition has become infructuous as the impugned order dated 28.7.2006 (Annexure P/2) has been withdnxwi by order dated 22.9.2006 (Annexure R/l) and the petitioner has been grouited salary ofi per revision on the basis of 5 Pay Commission. 2. Mr. Anand Kumar Tiwari, leou'ned counsel appearing for the petitioner agrees with the ajbmissions made by learned counsel appearing for the req»ondents/5tate. 3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. Sdi- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge