»1f DIVSSiON BENCH HON'BLE SHRi JAGDSSH BHALLA, Ag. CJ. & WritAppeal No. 10SOf2007 N.K. Gupta aged 54 years, S/o. late S.L. Gupta, working as Inspector at Potice station - Bagicha, District Jashpur[C.G.] Yersus . • ~ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Home Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur [C.G.] 2. The Director Generai of Police, Poliee Headquarter.Raipur [C.G.] 3. Superintendent of Police, District Jashpur[C.G.] 4. Sanjay Bhushan Day, Inspector, through Superintendent of P!ice, Balrampur, DistrietSurguja [C.G.J 5. Mukesh Khare, Inspector, through Superintendent of Police, Raipur, District Raipur [C.G.] 6. Rakesh Baghe!, Snspector, through Superintendent of Pdlice, Raipur, District Raipur [C.G.j Writ ApDeat under Section 2(1) of Chhattisaarh Hiah Court fAppeal tb Db?isi0h Bench) Rui6,2006. None appears forthepetitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Government Adyocate for the State. ORALORDER •.,:• :. . - . (Passed bn 12tn October, 2007) The foiiowing oral order of the Court was pasSed b) l.G.,J.1': •-• ,.•-.,.. 1-'1 •'s....\ K iijlAsiaiatciaisBi This wrii appeal arises out of the order dated 08.08.2006, whereby the writ petition chailenging the order of transfer of the petitioner - appeilant dated 05.07.2006 has been dismjssed. In writ petition, the submission of learnsd-counsel for the pstitioner- appellantwas that he was frequently transferred; therefore, he has approached. this Court. The petitioner was repatriatedto his parent departmsnt wherein he reported on 25.03.2006 at Poiice Headquarters. Thereafter, he was posted at district Jashpur where the Superintendent or Poiice, Jashpur vide order dated 13.04.2006 posted him as Inspecfor, City Kotwaii, Jashpur and in loca! arrangement, on 15.05.2008 the petitioner was asked to go to Narayanpur. Again, the petitioner by way of local arrangement was transferred to Bagescha by order dafed 05.06.2006 and finaily he was transferred to District Dantewada. Time and again, the Hon'bie ApexCourt has expressed that the order of transfer is within the domain of adminisfrative authorities. However, the same can be challenged ifthere is any violation of iaw or strong case of malafsde. Thers is no foundation of the same. We are sf the considered opinion that the transfers rsferred to hereinabove wouid not fa!l in the categor/ of frequent transfers for the reason that the pstitionsr after repatriation reported at Poiice Headquarters; thereafter he was transferred to djstrict Jashpur as referred tq )»rt»-L ] ' , \ hersinabove and thereafter ths' Police Chief had sosted him at three l*.lML-«X<W~^W*>^i__J places in the district ttseff. We are Fn agreement with the view expresssd by Hon'ble Single Judge. in the !ightofthe above,|Hon'ble Single Judge has rightly dismissed the w.rit petitlon. Aceordiiiigly, the .writ appea! is dismissed._ Sd/- Ag ChiefJustice ^ ^ — SdA, , :• SatishK.AgnihoCri "|,:;:';:'Judge-:,'. '