1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITON NO.4065 OF 2011. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _______________________|_______________________________________ CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J. Date : 16.06.2011. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioners had obtained Recovery Certificate U/s 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. The opponents therein filed Revision before the Divisional Joint Registrar. The Divisional Joint Registrar partly allowed the Revision and remanded the matter to the Taluka Deputy Registrar. The said order is challenged by the petitioners. 3. Mr.Garud, learned counsel submits that many opportunities were given to the present Respondents. It is not a case that no opportunity was given. As such the Revisional authority 2 should have remanded the matter. The promissory notes, the accounts are produced before the Deputy Registrar, on the basis of which the Recovery Certificate has been issued. The Respondents are simply protracting the matter and are not paying any amount. According to the learned counsel, the Respondent No.3 could not have remitted the matter in such a casual manner. 4. Perusal of the order shows that the Revisional authority had noticed some anomalies and charging of rate of interest. The Revisional authority has considered that the Deputy Registrar has not given any finding on some of the aspects of the matter, such as rate of interest charged at 24% and the amount that was repaid. 5. Taking into account the above aspects, the matter is remitted by the Respondent No.3 to Respondent No.2. The petitioner also would have an opportunity to put forth its case and explain the anomalies which are pointed out. 6. In the result, no fault can be found in the order of the Revisional authority. As such the 3 Writ Petition is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 7. The Respondent No.2 shall decide the proceedings U/s 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, expeditiously. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) Dt.16.06.2011. asp/office/wp4065.11