IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6933 of 2011 MD. IBRAN @ MD. BABLU, S/O MD. QAYUM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 27.4.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence u/s.395 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1-B) of the Arms Act. The petitioner was refused bail by orders dated 20.4.2010 and 22.12.2010 vide Cr.Misc.No.12149 of 2010 and Cr.Misc.No.32847 of 2010, but on 22.12.2010 he had been given the liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge if his case is not bifurcated. It has been submitted that charges against all the accused persons have been framed by an order dated 13.1.2011 and, therefore, the petitioner deserves bail. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in Sessions Trial No.17 of 2011 arising out of Kazimohammadpur P.S. case No.137 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor shall be the mother of the petitioner and the other bailor will be a close relative of - 2 - the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )