FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1414 OF 2011 “Parmarth Sanskratik Mahila Mandal, Aurangabad Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. V.M. Kagne, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. V.D. Godbharle, AGP for respondent No.1 Mr. S.N. Pagare, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM :- D.B. BHOSALE & A.V. NIRGUDE, JJ. DATE :- 15th March, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2] By this writ petition, the petitioners are seeking directions to respondent nos. 2 and 3, to consider their representations dated 19/1/2011 and 29/1/2011 ( annexed at Exhibit P-4, collectively, to the petition), within time frame. The petitioners are demanding execution of lease deed in respect of the land opposite to Hanuman Temple, situated in N-4, CIDCO. 3] We do not propose to examine merits of the request/prayers made by the petitioners in the aforementioned representations. Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 submits that respondent Nos. 2 and 3, will consider the representations made by the petitioners and pass appropriate FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1414 OF 2011 “Parmarth Sanskratik Mahila Mandal, Aurangabad Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 orders, within a period of 12 weeks from today. The statement is accepted. 4] In view of the statement made on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3, writ petition is disposed of. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] grt/-