IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37169 of 2009 1. SONE LAL @ DR.SONE LAL 2. SULOCHANA DEVI 3. SANJAY SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 19.11.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioners, who are three in numbers, have approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners is that the daughter of the informant had gone to the house of petitioner no.1. She did not return. Following morning the dead body was found having stained mark around the neck. Petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are husband and wife, whereas petitioner no.3 is their son. From the impugned order it appears that circumstances indicate involvement of the petitioner nos.1 and 2. In that view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory to petitioner nos. 1 and 2, namely, Sone Lal @ Dr. Sone Lal and Sulochana Devi. Their prayer for bail is, therefore, rejected. So far as petitioner no.3, namely, Sanjay Sharma is concerned, in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, petitioner no.3, named above, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M. Bhagalpur in connection with Budhuchak ( Kahalgaon) P.S. Case no. 16 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. It is made clear that one of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioner. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)