IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13509 of 2011 NIKHIL PRIYADARSHI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 10.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323, 406, 409, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that in spite of the payment of Rs. 9,52,207, the vehicle was not delivered by the petitioner, who is authorized dealership of Mahendra Company. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the total payment has been returned. It is submitted by learned counsel for the complainant that he spent Rs. 25,000/- in making processes in the bank, hence, he is entitled for the said money. Considering the fact that the principal amount has been returned, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event 2 of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Complaint Case No. 2282/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)