IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.No. M- 3294 of 2010 Date of decision:- 29.3.2010 Babli and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present:- Mr. Satish Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.M. Anand, Addl. A.G. Haryana. RAM CHAND GUPTA J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in FIR No.178 dated 11.8.2006, under Sections 148,149,323,324,325,294 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar, Tohana, Tehsil Tohana, District Fatehabad. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. .This Court while issuing notice of motion on 23.2.2010 passed the following order:- “Argues that both the petitioners are ladies and petitioner No.2 is 69 years of age and that they had been appearing before learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing and they could not appear on one date, i.e., on 10.12.2009 as inadvertently the date of hearing noted by counsel was 24.3.2010 instead of 10.12.2009. It is further contended that petitioners are ready to appear before learned trial Court and face trial. Notice of motion for 29.3.2010. However, in the meantime, the petitioners are directed to appear before learned trial Court on 3.3.2010, which is stated to be the date fixed and on that date the petitioners be admitted to interim bail by learned trial Court to its satisfaction subject to the conditions imposed.” Criminal Misc.No. M- 3294 of 2010 -2- It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that they have already appeared before the trial Court and admitted to bail vide order dated 3.3.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioners further stated that the petitioners undertake to appear before the trial Court on each and every date of hearing during the trial. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has not disputed these facts. In view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition for anticipatory bail is accepted and order dated 23.2.2010, granting interim bail to the petitioners Babli and Teejo Devi, is, hereby confirmed subject to any condition that may be imposed by learned trial Court. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. March 29, 2010 ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) vj JUDGE