IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 21ST JANUARY 2008 / 1ST MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 2421 of 2008(L) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- V.P.SHEEJA,W/O. VINOD .V.C. AGED 30 YEARS, RESIDING AT KUNIYIL HOUSE, POST PANTHAKKAL,MOOLAKKADAVU, MAHE. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SREE RAMASWAMY TEMPLE, THIRUVANGAD, THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. SMT. JAYASREE, W/O.LATE SIVARAMAKRISHNA MOOSAD, 'RAIL VIEW', THIRUVANGAD, THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. 3. THE MANAGING TRUSTEE, BAORD OF TRUSTEES, SREE RAMASWAMY TEMPLE, THIRUVANGAD, THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. 4. THE COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS & CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE. 5. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF DEVASWOM, TRIVANDRUM. 6. THE JOINT SECRETARY, DEPARMENT OF DEVASOM, TRIVANDRUM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BEJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No. 2421 of 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 21st January, 2008 J U D G M E N T As permitted under Exhibit P2 judgment, the petitioner preferred a statutory revision under Section 99 of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, before the Government and also moved Exhibit P3 petition for stay of operation of the order dated 21.6.2006 promoting the 2nd respondent as U.D. Clerk in the Sree Ramaswsamy Temple, Thiruvangad pending disposal of the petition before the Government. Going by the averments in para 4 of the writ petition, petitioner tried her best to get the petition taken on file by the competent authority and had also moved an application for stay. After having heard the learned Government Pleader also, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 5th respondent to pass orders on Exhibit P3 petition for stay, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the order of status quo ordered in W.P ( C) No. 2421 of 2008 2 Exhibit P2 judgment shall continue to be in force till orders are passed on Exhibit P3 in this regard. Thereafter, the interim arrangement between the parties will be governed by the orders to be passed by the 5th respondent on Exhibit P3. (V.GIRI, JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No. 2421 of 2008 2 K.THANKAPPAN,J CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999 ORDER 25th May, 2007