IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Criminal Misc. No.52272-M of 2007 Date of Decision:05.02.2008 Satish Kumar .....Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. J.S.Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, DAG, Punjab. Mr. N.S.Dadwal, Advocate for the complainant. **** RAJESH BINDAL, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This petition is for pre-arrest bail of the father-in-law of the complainant. The marriage of the son of the petitioner took place with the complainant on 2.9.2006. Within nearly two months, the differences arose and a complaint was filed, the matter was taken up before Women Cell where even the complainant stated that she still want to live in the in-laws' house. However, from October, 2006, she is living with her parents. The FIR in question was lodged on 15.8.2007. Be that as it may. Without commenting on the merits of the controversy, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 26.11.2007 is made absolute. The petition is disposed of. February 05, 2008 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) renu JUDGE