IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 3150 OF 2004. SUIT NO. 3150 OF 2004. SUIT NO. 3150 OF 2004. M/s. SHILP-I ..Plaintiff versus Rajeshkumar C. Gandhi & Another ..Respondents SUIT NO. 3151 OF 2004. SUIT NO. 3151 OF 2004. SUIT NO. 3151 OF 2004. M/s. SHILP-I ..Plaintiff versus Ashesh C. Gandhi & Another ..Respondents Mr.K.R.Parekh for the Plaintiff Mr.Denzil D’Mello for the defendant Coram : Coram : Coram : S.R.Sathe, JJ. S.R.Sathe, JJ. S.R.Sathe, JJ. Dated : 8th June, 2007 Dated : 8th June, 2007 Dated : 8th June, 2007 P.C. 1. Heard learned Advocate for the plaintiff. He seeks withdrawal of the suit unconditionally. The learned advocate appearing for the defendant objects. He submits that he has no objection for withdrawal, however, plaintiff be directed to pay the cost. 2. The learned Advocate for the plaintiff could not point out as to why in the instant case cost -2- could not be awarded. We can not ignore the fact that the suit is pending since 2004 and the defendant has been certainly put to some inconvenience. The normal rule is cost must follow the event. Hence, suit is dismissed as withdrawn. 2. Plaintiff to pay cost of this suit to the defendant and bear his own. (S.R.Sathe, J.) (S.R.Sathe, J.) (S.R.Sathe, J.)