THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR WRIT PETITION No.1993 of 2011 ORDER: (Per GMJ) This writ petition is filed for a Certiorari calling for the records of O.A.No.421 of 2011 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short ‘the Tribunal) and also to quash the order dated 31.01.2011 passed by the Tribunal in the said O.A. and, consequently to set aside the memo dated 22.12.2010 issued by the second respondent and also direct the second respondent to allow the petitioner in the office of the Assistant Director of Agriculture (ADA), Nandigama, Krishna District as ADA. By the impugned memo dated 22.12.2010, the second respondent transferred the petitioner from ADA(R) Nandigama to ADA(R) Addateegala, East Godavari District, in the existing vacancy on disciplinary grounds as per the exemption clause contained in G.O.Ms.No.196 dated 22.07.2009. Questioning the above said impugned transfer memo, the petitioner filed O.A.No.421 of 2011 before the Tribunal. The Tribunal, by the impugned order dated 31.01.2011, though admitted the O.A., observed that the transfer of the petitioner was effected in view of the allegation that he demanded money from the agriculturists for supply of fertilizers and therefore, it is not desirable to suspend the operation of the impugned transfer order dated 22.12.2010 issued by the second respondent. The petitioner approached this Court questioning the impugned transfer memo dated 22.12.2010 as well as the impugned order of the Tribunal dated 31.01.2011 passed in O.A.No.421 of 2010 refusing to suspend the impugned transfer memo. From the above, it is seen that the Tribunal, by the impugned order dated 31.01.2011, though admitted O.A.No.421 of 2010, refused to grant suspension of the impugned transfer memo dated 22.12.2010, and the O.A. is pending before it. When once the matter is ceased up by the Tribunal, we are not inclined to exercise jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and the writ petition is misconceived. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. However, since O.A.No.421 of 2010 is pending before the Tribunal, it is directed to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J _____________ K.G.SHANKAR, J 02nd February, 2011 GHN