f “M I b KN— IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP NO. 31722003 f PETITIONER ' SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA ASSTT.GRADE 3, KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI (AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETTING COMMITTEE), BILASPUR, DIST. B‘LASPUR. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : (1) CHHATTISGARH STATE THUGH PRICIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE , GOVERNMENT OF CHHATTISGARH, DKS ,MANTHRLAY BHAVAN, RAIPUR. (2)MANAGING DIRECTO, MARKETING BOAD, CHHATTISHGRAH STATE AGRICULTURAL PURANI GANJ MANDI PREMISES, RAIPUR. (3)3ECRETARY, KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITHI, BILASPUR, DIST. BILASPUR. : .. ¥ g/ V RO A R R WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22%]227é THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Shri K. R. Nair, counsei for me pcf‘fionar. Shri Runbir Singh, Govt Advucofe for ‘l'he State/Menu. Haw-d bo1h the cowl. The petifioner has preferrw this peféfion under Artick 226/227 of fhe Consfifufion of India. The case of tho petii'ioner- is that he is working as A.6.-III in the Markefing Krishi U Mandi Samifi. Bilapur and from when The petitioner has bean sent on putation to newly created Krishi Upqj Mandi 5amiti, Jaijepur, Distr Jungir-Champa vide order dated 24-6-2003 issued by the Joint rector with the approval of Managing Director, Chhattisgorh State Agri ultural Mwketing Bowd, Raipur. The petitioner has been relieved v order dated 26-6-2003 ismed by respondent No.3 with o direction to join ot Krishi Upqi Mandi somiti, J/‘oijepur, District Jonjgir Chanpa. The petitioner worked about 10 years from, 1974 in Krishi Upqi Mandi, 8 on daily wages. His services were regularized in 1983 and he w nted as Nokedon Later on he ww promoted as Assistant arade-III i the pay scale of Rs. 515-10-575-15-800 by order dated 9-2$5 and since the petitioner. is working as A.6.-III. Earlier the petitioner filed e writ petition before this Court which was registered as W.P. No. 1962 and in that petition vide orda' dated 11~8~2003 the petitioner was ailo to make a representation before the Competent Authority and Compe Authority was directed to decide his representation and. accordingly th representation of the petitioner has ,__.J i i p ‘ ' i i r i n / 3 w t the min grievance of the Iea / counsel or the pa‘ri'h‘oner is the 1h: defafion llowance has mt fied and ihe period of deputai'ion ha al not en fixed. Learned counsel fo fhe ondents swims tat as fa" as ih deputmin allowance is concerned orders have already been passed. The petitioner wil be entitled for s deputation allowance as per the Government Rules to which the l d counsel’for the titioner object that uless speciic order gi that how muc mount is be paid as deputation allowance, nobody is g t decid the coseof eetitioner and the peioner will be made r fro pilla os an wil not get deputtion owance Havig heard the ened othe partiesondhavl regwd to r lar -. s lfr ng t' - o.2 ird the facts and circumstances of case, respondent N is decte to / issue orders or deputatn allo e m also he perio fr whh h petitioner has been sent on deputot . '. Accordingly, the writ petitio stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P. No. 2899/2003 aid I.A.No.9349/2003 also stand disposed of. Parties are entitled for certified copy of this order. // Sdl- r L.C.BHADOO /, Judge bite éfa'a a r ~ f ? pu a tun x sa be r p h e o , l a i e e pe s n a f is v h to o' 9 o e t thi tit u m r to pt d e l a all. f io w c d t d o ic te