1 1. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2792/2009 GULAB CHAND TAK VS. UOI & ORS. 2. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2828/2009 BAJRANG PAREEK VS. UOI & ORS. 3. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3253/2009 DUNGAR SINGH VS. UOI & ORS 4. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3836/2009 MULTANA RAM VS. UOI & ORS. 5. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3840/2009 BHAWANI SHANKER & ORS VS. UOI & ORS. 6. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3841/2009 CHANDA RAM VS. UOI & ORS. Date of order : 18.12.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. None present for the petitioner(s). Mr. RL Jangid, Addl. Advocate General for the respondent State. Mr.VK Mathur, for the respondent-UOI <><><> Since learned Addl. Advocate General Sh. RL Jangid and learned Sr.CGSC Sh. VK Mathur put in appearance for all the respondents in connected matters and they have been decided finally, therefore, the service is complete and at the request of learned counsel for the respondents, these writ petitions are decided in the light of the judgment 2 of this Court delivered in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2718/2009 – Prem Prakash Vs. UOI & Ors. decided on 21.11.2009 alongwith other connected matters. In view of the above, the present writ petitions are also allowed and petitioners are allowed to continue on the respective posts till the scheme of Lok Talim (or scheme in any other name) is implemented. The petitioner(s) shall be entitled for continuity in service, but no entitled to fix remuneration for intervening period in case the scheme of Lok Talim (or in any other name) is implemented. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. cpgoyal/- 3 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO._______/2009 Date of order : 18.12.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. None present for the petitioner(s). Mr. RL Jangid, Addl. Advocate General for the respondent State. Mr.VK Mathur, for the respondent-UOI <><><> This writ petition is allowed [ see separate judgment in S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2792/2009-GULAB CHAND TAK VS. UOI & ORS]. decided today itself. By orders Court master.