CWP No. 4523 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 4523 of 2009 Date of decision: 23.3.2009 Mrs. Sudha Singla ...Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr. V.K.Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Arvind Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. (oral) 1. This petition seeks direction for reasonable and adequate compensation, which may also not discriminate between one claimant or other. 2. Case of the petitioner is that she purchased the land in the year 2002. The same was sought to be acquired by notification dated 4.7.2006 under Section 4 which was followed by notification dated 22.6.2007 under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The petitioner had set up a Reliance Retail Outlet on the adjoining land. While compensation for other land in the village was being awarded @ Rs.7250/- sq. yard, the petitioner was apprehending that she will get less compensation. 3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. There is no challenge to the acquisition in this petition. Only prayer is for direction for grant of reasonable and adequate compensation. CWP No. 4523 of 2009 2 As per statutory scheme, the compensation is to be determined by the Collector after giving opportunity to the affected party and if aggrieved, the affected party has further remedies. 5. We do not find any ground to entertain this petition at this stage. 6. The petition is dismissed. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE 23.3.2009 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) mk JUDGE