IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. : 2758 of 2008. Decided on: 28th July, 2010. _________________________________________________________ Mahinder Kumar. …Petitioner. -Versus- H.P. Tourism Development Corporation Limited and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge(Oral): The petitioner is seeking regularization as Auto Electrician. The case of the petitioner was referred to the Service Committee. However, the post of Auto Electrician has not been created by the Service Committee for the simple reason that the petitioner is seeking regularization against the post of Auto Electrician from the date he started discharging his duties as Auto Electrician. However, Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the respondents submits that if the petitioner restricts his claim for the creation of post of Auto Electrician as of today, the post will be created and the petitioner shall be considered against the same. 2. Consequently, in view of this fair stand adopted by the respondent-Corporation, the post of Auto Electrician now be created, as undertaken and the petitioner be regularized against 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. the same. The needful be done within a period of 12 weeks from today. The Court appreciates the manner in which the matter has been dealt with by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-Corporation. 3. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the petition stands disposed of. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 28, 2010. (bhupender)