THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO :19912 of 2009 DATED: 17-09-2009 Between: T.Venkataramana. ..... PETITIONER And The Superintendent of police, Kadapa District & 2 others. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: The grievance of the petitioner is that though he made a complaint to the 2nd respondent on 03-08-2009 against the 3rd respondent, the 2nd respondent has not initiated any action i.e., registration of the crime etc., In that view of the matter, he approached the 1st respondent and made a complaint on 10-08- 2009. However, the 1st respondent also did not instruct the 2nd respondent to register the said crime. Hence, the petitioner approached this Court and filed the present Writ Petition. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents 1 & 2. 3. When once the respondents 1 and 2 have not acted on the basis of the said complaint, it is open for the petitioner to approach the competent criminal Court and file a complaint as provided for under Section 200 Cr.P.C. In my considered view that is the best course left open to the petitioner instead of approaching this Court and filing the present Writ Petition. Accordingly, petitioner is hereby directed to approach the competent criminal Court and file a private complaint and the concerned Magistrate may either take cognizance of the offence or refer the matter to the police for investigation, as provided for under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., in which event the police are bound to register the First Information Report. 4. With the above observations, Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ T.GOPALAKRISHNA,J 17th September, 2009. Tsy