1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1176 OF 2010 Mr.Adhir Chintamani Thakur. ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. Mr.S.C.Kokane i/by V.G.Bagade for the Applicant. Mr. Y.S.Shinde, APP. for the State. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 23rd March, 2010 PC : 1 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail. The applicant is shown as an accused in C. R. No.209/2009 registered by Bhayander Police Station for alleged offences under Sections 420, 463, 447 and 452 of the I.P.C. The complaint is registered at the instance of Manubhai W. Shah who claims that he is the purchaser of gala bearing 320sq.ft. and he has purchased the said gala from one Champalal Vaishnav. The document 2 indicates that Champalal Vaishnav was the original tenant. In a suit filed by the applicant s father against his tenant the settlement was arrived at and under the compromise decree the tenant has to construct and keep the ground floor with him. The record indicates that complainant has purchased the ground floor from the tenant. In the complaint, it is stated that the said premises was kept locked for two years but when the complainant visited the premises on 4.11.2009, he found present applicant Adhir Thakur occupying the same and the present applicant told him that he may do what he wish but he would not vacate the premises. In this view of the matter, in my view, it needs to be ascertained how and when the suit premises was broken into. The allegation is that some articles are missing and they have to be recovered. In the circumstances, not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence, application is rejected. 2 It is made clear that the observations made 3 in this order will not be used while deciding the bail application or at the stage of trial. ( R.S. MOHITE, J.)