1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Third Bail Application No.6902/2010 Pillu Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 6.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Arvind Kumar Sharma - for the petitioner Mr Laxman Meena, Public Prosecutor Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co- accused Mukesh has already been enlarged on bail by the coordinate Bench though while granting bail to Mukesh it was alleged that Pillu (present petitioner) had caused head injury. Now the statement of injured Ramphal has been recorded and he has assigned head injury to Mukesh by sharp edged weapon. So far as petitioner is concerned, he is said to have caused blow on right hand. Looking to the aforesaid and the fact that petitioner is behind bars for the last eight months and trial may take time, he may be enlarged on bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 2 After considering the rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. It is directed that petitioner namely, Pillu son of Battu be released on bail under Section 439 CrPC in FIR No.277/2009 registered at Police Station – Sadar, Karauli for offences under Section/s 323, 324, 307 IPC provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. Learned PP would, however, be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail of Mukesh looking to the court statement of Ramphal-injured. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma 3