j (M/ 1N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR [c.G.1 WRIT PETITION (s1 No. QQI 9 /2009 $§E§€AL§ $E§§§§%§ // S.D.Pandey S/o Sri R.N.Pandey Aged— about 58 years, working as a EP fitter, R/o MD-289 Dipika colony, Gevara project, SECL, Distt.- Korba [C.G.] PETITIONER VERSUS /( 1.South eastern coal flelds limited through- chairman cum managing director [CMD] RESPONDENTS A? Seepat a road, Bilaspur [C.G.] 3" . can. "‘ //2. Director personnel, South eastern coal fields limited, seepat road, Bilaspur [C.G.] /, 3.Chief General Manager, South eastern coal fields limited, Gevera area, Distt.— Korba [C.G.] W4.Personnel manager, South eastern coal flelds limited, , Gevera area, Distt.— Korba [C.G.] K 5iChief medical Officer, Neharu Centenary Hospital, (NCH) Gevera area, Distt.— Korba [C.G.] WRIT PEI‘ITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTIONS l ,t “Bf HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Wlit Peu'tion (S) No. 62 19 of 2009 S. D. Pandey Versus Petitioner Respondents South Eastern Coal Fields Limited 8r. others (Writ Petition under A11icle 226 of the Constitution of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. AgnjhotriJ.) Shxi Sanjay Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P. S. Koshy, Advocate for the respondents. ORDER 10ml) Heard. (Passed on this 9th day of November, 2009) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits, at this stage. However, he prays that the Iespondent—authorities may be directed to consider and decide his 'pending replesentations (Annexure P/3), as early as possible. 2. Shii P. S. Koshy, learned counsel, pmsent in the Court, who is in the Panel of Lawyers appearing for the respondents] S.E.C.L., is directed to take notice. Shri Koshy, learned cOunsel, appearing for the respondents submits that the pending mpresentations, if any, may be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks mam the date of receipt of acopy of this order. Invview of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication at this stage. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order asto costs. i 1 _ 8d]- 1 ‘Satish K.Agnihstri ‘ . 'J'udge x 4