IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. W.J.C.No.1130 of 2010 TETARI DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 2. 11.3.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The prayer of the petitioner is that even though she is not an accused in Marhourah Police Station Case No.161/09 for the alleged offences under section 366A of the Penal Code in which the accused is the son of the petitioner and since coercive process under section 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been issued against him, she is being harassed by the investigating officer. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. Notwithstanding the rival submissions of the parties, it will be open for the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the concerned Superintendent of Police with respect to the allegations made in this writ application, who will look into it, in accordance with law. The writ application stands disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)