IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH MARCH 2011 / 20TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 4233 of 2011(D) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- M.R.CHANDRAKUMARAN NAIR, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O. RAGHAVAN PILLAI, ASWATHY, PEDIKULLAM, PULIMATH VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.HABEEB RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VENJARAMOODU POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 607. 3. ANILKUMAR @ MUTHU, LEKHA BHAVAN, KARUMKUTTIKARAYIL, MELATTUMUZHI, VAMANAPURAM VILLAGE, PIN-695 606. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. CHARISHMA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. *********************** W.P(C) No.4233 of 2011-D ***************************** Dated this the 11th day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT BASANT, J. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays and this petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE) rtr/ R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. *********************** W.P(C) No.4233 of 2011 ***************************** Dated this the 24th day of February, 2011 ORDER BASANT, J. The learned Government Pleader after taking instructions submits that not the 3rd respondent alone, but members of the local public are raising objections against the activities of the petitioner. Their grievance, the learned Government Pleader submits, is that under the guise of carrying on fish farming, sand is being removed from the land of the petitioner and against that, local persons are raising objections. We direct the petitioner to array the revenue officials concerned as respondents in this petition. We direct the learned Government Pleader to get respondents 1 and 2 to file statement explaining to the Court the nature of the objections raised by the local people, including the names of the persons who are raising such objections. We do so direct as we are not satisfied that the 3rd respondent is the real person raising the objection. It appears to us that the 3rd respondent is conveniently arrayed as a respondent with the full knowledge that he shall not appear and raise objection. It is, in these circumstances, that we issue the above directions. Take all necessary steps in 7 days. 2. Call on 11.03.2011. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE) rtr/