..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2703 OF 2008 1. Hemant Ramchandra Divekar, & 2. Vinod Kisan Rahate. ..Applicants. Versus Versus Versus The Senior Inspector of Police and Anr. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Rahul S. Thakur, Adv. for the applicants. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 27th August, 2008. DATED : 27th August, 2008. DATED : 27th August, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicants and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking bail in C.R.No.74 of 2007 of Revdanda Police Station. The said case is mainly under Sections 395, 397 of IPC. 3. Both the applicants have been identified in the parade. There is recovery at the instance of applicant No.1 of cash of Rs.84,400/- and there is recovery of cash of Rs.89,000/- at the instance of ..(2).. applicant No.2. 4. The learned Advocate for the applicants submitted that witness Sharad Pandit has stated that the accused persons were wearing monkey caps. Out of the said persons, only one person has removed the monkey caps. Hence, it is submitted that it was not possible for the witness to identify two of the accused persons. I have perused the statement of Sharad Pandit. In the said statement, he has stated that if he sees all the dacoits, he would identify them. Thereafter, this witness has identified the present applicants. Looking to the material on record, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicants. Application for bail is rejected. Trial expedited. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)