IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1630 OF 2006 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1630 OF 2006 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1630 OF 2006 Mr.Sanjay Jaisingh Vijunda. ...Petitoner V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ...Respondent Ms.Anjali Patil for Petitioner. Mr.S.R. Shinde, APP for State. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE, J. DATED : AUGUST 7, 2006 DATED : AUGUST 7, 2006 DATED : AUGUST 7, 2006 P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- . By this petition, the petitioner has impugned the Show Cause Notice under Section 111 of the Cr.P.C. dated 18th July, 2006 calling upon the petitioner to show cause why bond for keeping the peace be not ordered against him. On 27th July, 2006, the petitioner was also ordered to execute interim bond, without recording any reasoning. The show cause notice need not be interfered with since the petitioner has every right to contest the said notice by filing reply. So far the petitioner has not filed reply. Keeping that in view, I am satisfied that following order shall meet the ends of justice :- - 2 - (a) Petitioner is at liberty to contest the show cause notice dated 18th July, 2006 by filing reply within 10 days from today. The concerned authority shall decide the notice after considering the reply, if any, on merits in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of eight weeks therefrom, (b) The Special Executive Magistrate shall not insist for interim bond to be executed by the petitioner for the aforestated period. However, that shall not preclude him from passing fresh order directing the petitioner to execute interim bond by recording reasons in writing to that effect, if the circumstances so demand. . Petition is disposed of. (D.B. Bhosale, J.) (D.B. Bhosale, J.) (D.B. Bhosale, J.)