IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 8413 of 2009 Between: Sri.K.V.Rao S/o.Late K.Subbaiah D.No.7/347/1D2, Simhapuri colony, Kadapa Kadapa District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Sub-Inspector of Police, I Town, P.S.Kadapa Kadapa District 2 The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa,Kadapa District 3 Nayuni Babaiah, D.No.4/3028, Nagarajupet, Kadapa, Kadapa District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not taking any action on the representation of the petitioner dated 19.2.2009 against the 3rd respondent is illegal,arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to dispose of the Representation of the petitioner dated 19.2.2009 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.VENKATA RAGHU MANNEPALLI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA Writ Petition No.8413 OF 2009 ORDER: 1 The petitioner approached this court and filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not taking any action on the representation of the petitioner dated 19.2.2009 against the 3rd respondent is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to dispose of the Representation of the petitioner dated 19.2.2009 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” 2 A detailed counter affidavit is filed sworn to by the Sub Inspector of Police, I Town P.S. Kadapa stating that pursuant to the report given by the petitioner a case in Cr.No.20 of 2009 was registered against the third respondent for the offences punishable under sections 324 and 506 r/w 34 of IPC and he was arrested on 30.01.2009 and was subsequently released on bail. A charge sheet was also filed after completion of the investigation in the said crime. It is further stated in the said counter affidavit that basing on a complaint given by one Madusudan, another case in Cr.No.33 of 2009 was registered against the third respondent for the offence punishable under Section 420 of IPC and he was arrested in connection with the said crime on 19.2.2009 and a charge sheet was also filed in that case. It is also stated in the counter affidavit that on the basis of a report given by the third respondent a case in Cr.No.106 of 2009 was registered against the petitioner for the offence punishable under section 420 of IPC, but, however, the matter was dropped as it came to light after investigation that it is a civil in nature. 3 From the above facts, it is clear that the police have acted upon the complaints given by the petitioner and others and have initiated necessary action against the third respondent. Hence this court is of the view that no orders can be passed in this Writ Petition. However, the petitioner states that he is having threat to his life and limb at the hands of the third respondent and as such he needs police protection. If he apprehends danger it is always open for him to approach the police and seek police protection. 4 With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ------------------ 11.08.2009 kvsn