IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.4957 of 2009 Date of decision: 6.7.2010 Sahib Singh ......Appellant(s) Versus Sunita Rani and another ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. A.K. Khunger, Advocate for the appellant. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral) In the present case, notice was issued only for a limited purpose to explore the possibility of amicable settlement between the parties. However, respondents No.1 and 2 could not be served. On May 20, 2010, the aforesaid respondents were ordered to be served by way of dasti. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has submitted that dasti summons could not be effected. It seems that in spite of the fact that notice was got issued on a limited point, the appellant does not wish to settle the same. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to proceed further in this case. Dismissed. July 6, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE