IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH MARCH 2007 / 7TH CHAITHRA 1929 WP(C).No. 13877 of 2004(B) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. SHABU VARGHESE, AGED 27 YEARS S/O. VARGHESE, KADUKKOYIKKAL HOUSE, PALLIPPAD, HARIPAD, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. SUNIL KUMAR, KANNATTU VEETTIL, KAVUMBHAGOM. 3. SANTHOSH NIKATHIL VEEDU, KARTHIKAPPILLY. BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. SUB COLLECTOR (REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER), CHENGANNUR. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEEYAPURAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 13877 of 2004(B) :2: APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE PERMIT NO.ENDT.No.C2/012445/2001/AK DATED 27.11.2001. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE PERMIT NO.ENDT.NO.C2/01282/04/AK. DATED 23.2.2004. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.G.2244/2004 DATED 22.4.2004 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.G.2245/2004 DATED 22.4.2004 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD PETITIONER. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 23.4.2004 SUBMITTED BUY THE FIRST PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 25.9.2003 PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN W.P.(C) NO.30078 OF 2003. TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE KURIAN JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)NO.13877 OF 2004 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28th day of March 2007 JUDGMENT Grievance is on Exts.P3 and P4 notices issued by the first respondent. It is seen that one of the writ petitioners has submitted Ext.P5 objection. It will be open to the other petitioners also to submit objections, if any, within a period of one month from today. There will be a direction to the first respondent to look into the matter and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law adverting to the contentions taken by the petitioners, with notice to them, within four months. The fate of the interim order dated 30.4.04 will depend on the order thus passed by the first respondent. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE jes