IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1454 (SS) of 2011 Smt. Monika Bhatnagar …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, learned counsel present for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel present for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage itself. The case of the petitioner is that she has been transferred vide order dated 15.11.2010. Subsequently, compliance of this order has been stayed by the concerned authorities. Aggrieved by the said order the petitioner has filed present writ petition. All the same, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 12.09.2011 (Annexure-7 to the writ petition) before the respondents, which is still pending and the same may be decided by the respondents. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to this innocuous prayer. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 12.09.2011 (Annexure-7 to the writ petition) as expeditiously as possible but definitely within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) Dated: 21.10.2011 VKG