IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 5700 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 05.12.2011 Tejpal and another ...Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rajiv Parshad, D.A.G., Haryana for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. S.K. Yadav, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned counsel has submitted that since respondent No.3 has already decided the appeal filed by the petitioners, so the instant writ petition become infructous, which may be dismissed as such. In this view of the matter, the instant writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous, as prayed for. December 05, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge