HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. PARAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5656 OF 2009. DATED 27TH AUGUST, 2010. BETWEEN Authu Rama Devi ….Petitioners and Devi Chenchamma and ors … Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. PARAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5656 OF 2009. ORDER: The petitioners herein are the plaintiﬀs, who by way of this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seek to assail the rejection of the application in I.A.No. 1185 of 2008 in O.S.No. 50 of 2007 whereby, they sought to implead the third respondent/proposed third defendant as third defendant in the suit on the ground that he is the subsequent purchaser of the suit property vide sale deed dated 17.5.2005, which is subsequent to the suit agreement of sale dated 29.12.2003. Admittedly the suit is one for speciﬁc performance of the suit agreement of sale dated 29.12.2003. The apprehension of the petitioners is that if the proposed party is not impleaded, it leads to multiplication of the proceedings. The ﬁrst respondent in her written statement stated that she sold the property in dispute under a sale deed dated 17.5.2005 in favour of the third respondent/proposed third defendant. The proposed party, to whom the suit property was sold subsequent to the suit agreement, is connected to the dispute involved in the suit and he is the necessary party to the suit, to be impleaded so that the Court also will have proper assistance for eﬀective adjudication of the suit and to deliver the decision on merits. More so, no loss would be caused to the respondents/defendants if the proposed party is impleaded as defendant. Merely saying that he is not at all concerned to be impleaded in the suit inasmuch as there is nothing for him to contest in the suit, is not a suﬃcient ground to reject the request of the petitioners. In the circumstances, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed, setting aside the order dated 01-09-2009 in I.A.No. 1185 of 2008 in O.S.No. 50 of 2007 on the ﬁle of the learned VIII Additional District Judge (FTC), Guntur. Consequently, I.A.No. 1185 of 2008 stands allowed. No order as to costs. ----------------------------------------- JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO 27T H AUGUST, 2010. MSNR.