HE‘EH GfiURT OF J£§BE$ATURE AT BELA$PUW£ CHHATTE$GARE4 s§ng§e §3ench : Hea’me smi ML aaitu, 6.1. Writ PeE§€§on wg. 258$ QF 2%2 Bhagwa? Prasad Dikshit, Sfo. MotHai Dikshit, aged abaut 4O years: Rz’o‘ Near Shiva Pan Theia. Jhopaddpara. Biiaspur (CG) Petitiweg Vs. ‘ "’., ff Respandems 8tate of Chhattisgarh thraugh its Secretary: Ministry of Forest, DKS. Bhawam, Raipur (CG) Divisional Forest Officer, Biiasapur Pores? Division, Biiaspur (CG) 3. Farest Range Range Lannani Forest Range, Diet: Biiaepur (CG) 4. Presiding Officer, LabourCeurt under D. Act, Biiaspur (CG) 10 @resené: Ms. Sharmiia Singhai; couneei fm the setitioner. Shri Sumeeh Baiaé, GA” fer ‘the reependente. aPueL 9R§ER {Paseeei en 2&5 Mama 2m?) The Tribunal in Case N0.’§!l.D.A./97.!1. dated 1&02200‘3 haai directed the respondents in thie writ eetitian to reinstate the petitioner into service. {2) Pursuance to the direction issued by the Tribunai, the reepondente iteve reinstated the petitioner into service in October 2001. it is the grievance of the petitioner that the respondents nave not paid the eatery for the period between 19m February 2G01 to October 2001 and from October 2001 to tiit February 2002. it is aiso stated in the petition that t.e petitioner has fiieci a representation before the respondents on 13,05QU02 requesting to pay his saiarv, for the aforesaid period. Since nothing has been done by the resoondents, the petitioner is before me in this writ petition. L (3) Responsibie respondents authorities ought to have considered the request made by the petitioner in his representation dated 13.052602. I Sime that has not been done: ih my opinion, a direction should be issued to the respondents as foiiows: oaneg ’i) The petition. is disposed of. 2) A direction is issued to the respondents to consider the representation tied by the petitioner dated 13052002 in accordance with iaiii/within six months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. ///