IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1288/07 IN S.A. 184/07 =================================== CORAM: S.R. DONGAONKAR, J. DATE:29.8.2008 Civil Application No.4883/2008 Heard Mr. Rai, Advocate for the applicant & Miss. Manisha Sahare, Advocate for respondents. By this application, the applicants desire to bring L.Rs. of respondent no.1 (ii) on record. Learned counsel for the proposed L.Rs. Miss. Sahare waives notice and contends that as the respondent no.1(ii) has expired on 19.9.2005, the applicant should have filed application for condonation of delay. As it appears that the proposed L.Rs. are represented and it is stated that there are no other L.Rs. other than who are mentioned in the application of deceased respondent no.1(ii), only technically filing application for condonation of delay is required. In these circumstances, this application is allowed. L.Rs. of respondent no.1(ii) be brought on record treating that the delay in bringing L.Rs. is condoned. Application stands disposed of. JUDGE smp.