IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34614 of 2009 CHANDRAMANI KUMAR SON OF SIDESHWAR PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BALWAPUR, P.S. DHANARUA, DISTRICT PATNA …. PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR ---------- 2. 14.10.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363 and 365/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is that in fact the petitioner’s sister’s marriage was fixed with the alleged kidnapped boy but after the initial negotiations the boy’ party started demanding more dowry. For return of the advanced money the father of the present petitioner filed a complaint against the informant and others and thereafter the present case was instituted. It has further been submitted that the petitioner and the victim boy was well known to each other despite the fact that in statement under section 164 Cr.P.C. he has not directly identified the petitioner and he says that he identified the accused persons from the talks which were held between them. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts as also the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, let the petitioner above named, who is in 2 custody since 22.6.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Masaurhi at Patna in Dhanarua P.S.case No.119 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )