IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 2691 OF 1985. NO. 2691 OF 1985. NO. 2691 OF 1985. Ravindran Sudarshan Kamtam. ... Plaiantiff. V/s. Nitin J. Purandare & ors. ... Defendants. None for the parties. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 3rd March 2006. 3rd March 2006. 3rd March 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . When the matter was called out in the pre-lunch session, nobody was present on behalf of the plaintiffs. Hence it was kept back. Even in the post-lunch session, none appeared for the plaintiffs. . In spite of order dated 2nd February, 2006, the plaintiff has neither filed any affidavit of evidence nor produced any original documents in support of suit claim. In this view of the matter, suit is dismissed for want of evidence with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, J.) J.) J.)