1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.829 OF 2009 IN SUIT N.523 OF 2009 Ashutosh V. Narvekar .. Plaintiff Versus Girish Gajanan Kanitkar .. Defendant Mr.Suneel Mogre for plaintiff Ms.Madhavi G. Kanitkar for defendant Nos. 1 to 3 CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 20th July 2009. P.C.: 1] When this matter was mentioned for ad-interim relief, a statement was made on behalf of defendant Nos. 1 to 3 that they will not sell the suit property and/or create any third party interest therein. 2] On instructions, the Counsel appearing for defendant Nos. 1 to 3 states that this statement can continue till the hearing and final disposal of the suit. However, she clarifies that the flat which is enlisted at Item No.1 in the Schedule of Assets at page 34 of the plaint, has four rooms. One room is in possession of defendant No.2 and her brother is occupying it 2 so also she is using the said premises for her professional purpose. Other three rooms are in possession of licensees under leave and licence agreement. She states that without prejudice to the rights and contentions of parties, the statement as aforesaid may continue and the defendants will provide copies of the leave and licence agreement to Mr.Mogre for plaintiff. Needless to clarify that the licence does not create any interest in the premises and, therefore, the statement as aforesaid is accepted. Defendant shall abide by the statement till the disposal of the suit. Motion is disposed of. No costs. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)