IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITIONNO.2482 OF 2009 Shri Pramod Kashinath Vaidya ... Petitioner. Vs. The Chief Officer, Khed Municipal Council & Anr. ... Respondents. Mr. A.R.Pitale for the petitioner. CORAM : V.C.DAGA & A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATE : October 14, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner. Perused petition. 2. It appears that the grievance which is being made in the present petition was made before the Hon'ble Lokayukta, Mumbai and the said grievance of the petition is still pending before the said authority. There is no material on record to suggest that any decision has been taken by Hon'ble Lokayukta, Mumbai. The petitioner cannot be allowed to prosecute two remedies at a time. 3. In the above view of the matter, we are not inclined to entertain this petition. However, it would be open for the petitioner to approach the Hon'ble Lokayukta to get the complaint/grievance decided with expeditious despatch. 4. In the event of the decision, it would be open for the petitioner to resort to an appropriate remedy, if he is not satisfied. - 2- 5. In the result, petition is dismissed keeping all contentions open with no order as to costs. [V.C.DAGA, J.] [A.A.SAYED, J.]