1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.4853 OF 1996. Dattatraya Pandurang Kamble ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents. ... Mr.A.B.Girase, advocate holding for Mr.R.B.Raghuwanshi, advocate for the petitioner. Mrs.R.K.Ladda, Asstt.Govt. Pleader for the State. Mrs.Manjusha Deshpande, advocate holding for Mr.A.S.Deshpande, advocate for the Respondent No. 5. ... CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 02.08.2010. ORAL ORDER (Per B.R.Gavai,J.) 1. W.P.No.4853/1996 taken up for hearing. Heard Mr.Girase, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.Deshpande, learned counsel for the Respondent No.5. The petitioner has filed 2 the present petition for direction to the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 to grant permanent approval to the appointment of the petitioner. 2. This Court vide order dated 4.5.1998, had granted interim relief in terms of prayer clause (B). This Court had further directed the management to recommend the case of the petitioner for approval and Respondent Respondent Nos.2 to 4 to give approval for releasing salary of the petitioner. In pursuance to the interim order passed by this Court, the approval was granted to the appointment of the petitioner vide order dated 1.12.1999. In view of Rule 26, the petitioner was absorbed in Shanteshwar Vidhyalaya, Sastur, Tq. Omerga. It can thus be seen that the purpose of the petition has been served by interim orders passed by this Court. Rule, is, therefore, made absolute in terms of interim orders. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (B.R.GAVAI,J.) asp/office/wp485396 3