Crl.Misc.M 27627 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-27627 of 2011 Date of Decision:September 12,2011 Deepak Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Fullerton India Credit Company Ltd. ...Respondent CORAM; HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. D.S.Kahlon, Advocate for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner is facing trial in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and was on bail. However, petitioner could not appear on the date fixed i.e. 27.6.2011 because of ill health. Petitioner is ready and willing to appear before the trial Court to face the trial. While relying on the judgment of this Court in Bhupinder Singh Chhabra Vs. State of Punjab and another (Crl.Misc.No.M 770 of 2011) decided on 1.2.2011, learned counsel for the petitioner argued that if petitioner has Crl.Misc.M 27627 of 2011 2 failed to appear in trial Court for the sufficient reason, he should be enlarged on bail. Petitioner shall appear/surrender before the trial Court on or before 28.9.2011. On furnishing satisfactory reason for remaining absent on the date of hearing, he shall be enlarged on bail by the learned trial Court provided petitioner undertakes that he shall keep on appearing on the dates fixed in the trial Court. Petition stands disposed of at the initial stage. (Alok Singh) September 12, 2011 Judge BB