skt/- 1 33.wp.1813.1998.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1813 OF 1998 Tatyasaheb Kore Warna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. Bhaskar Shankar Wandkar & Ors. ...Respondents. ..... Mr.S.S.Pakale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar, Advocate for respondent no.1. ..... CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED : 26TH MARCH, 2010. P.C.­ 1. The matter is from the final hearing board. This Court has admitted the petition on 16 th April 1998 and granted interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c). However, directed the main complaint proceeded to go on. 2. The main complaint must have been disposed of finally by this time. Therefore, in my view, as it is against the interlocutory order, in skt/- 2 33.wp.1813.1998.sxw view of this nothing survives in this petition. Interim order has passed by the Industrial Court must have been also disposed of. However, the petition is disposed of as infructous with liberty. Rule discharged. No costs. [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]