IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 2ND SEPTEMBER 2010 / 11TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 12004 of 2010(A) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- THE MULAKUZH SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.1224,MULAKUZHA P.O.,CHENGANNUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.N.ASHOK KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,K.S.T.P., KERALA P.W.D.KOTTARAKKARA. 3. THE TAHSILDAR,TALUK OFFICE, CHENGANNUR. R1 & R2 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.DILIP MOHAN R3 BY SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: SVS. WPC.NO.12004/2010 (A) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 12/06/2009. P2: COPY OF SALE DEED NO. 3143/1113 M.E OF CHENGANNUR S.R.O. P3: COPY OF NOTICE DATED 06/03/2010. P4: COPY OF OBJECTION DATED 31/03/2010. P5: COPY OF POSTAL RECEIPT P6: COPY OF PETITION DATED 26/07/2010. P7: COPY OF RE-SURVEY PLAN OF PETITIONER'S PROPERTY. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE SVS. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 12004 of 2010 A ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a Co-operative Bank. They approached this Court at a time when they were issued Ext.P3 notice, wherein the second respondent alleged that a portion of their property is in purampoke land. During the pendency of this writ petition, the petitioner filed Ext.P6 application to the third respondent, requesting for measurement of the property and demarcation of the purampoke, if any. When the matter was taken, the petitioner confined their prayer for a direction to the third respondent to take appropriate action on Ext.P6, in the light of Ext.P7 sketch. 2. Having heard the counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader, I feel the request made by the petitioner is quite reasonable. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition, directing the third respondent to take appropriate action on Ext.P6, in the light of Ext.P7. This shall be done within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. In the meanwhile, the interim order dated 06-04-2010 will remain in force. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks