{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9267 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.18159 OF 2007 New India Assurance Co.Ltd., APPLICANT VERSUS Vijay Rajabhau Hajare & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. Dhananjay Deshpande, Advocate for the applicant Mr. Sachin Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent No.2 ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 27th August 2010 PER COURT: 1. By the present application, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 137 days caused in preferring appeal against the order passed below Exhibit-5 in MACP No.82/2006 which was filed u/s 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. It appears that initially the applicant had challenged the impugned order by preferring Writ Petition No.3147/2007 on 26.04.2007, however the same was withdrawn by the applicant on 06.09.2007. Thus, the {2} grounds mentioned in the application seeking condonation of delay are sufficient to condone the delay. In the premise, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause “A” and “B” and stands disposed of. Office to register First Appeal Stamp No.18159/2007 and then to issue notice to the respondents after payment of requisite process fees by the applicant. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B10/ca9267-07 {3} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9266 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.18159 OF 2007 New India Assurance Co.Ltd., APPLICANT VERSUS Vijay Rajabhau Hajare & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. Dhananjay Deshpande, Advocate for the applicant Mr. Sachin Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent No.2 ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 27th August 2010 PER COURT: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The applicant has already deposited the amount of award in the trial court. In the premise, the earlier stay granted on 07.12.2007 to continue during the pendency of the appeal. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B10/ca9267-07