( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 371 OF 2010 Kazi Sayyad Ahmed PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others. RESPONDENTS .... Mr. A.G. Talhar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D.R. Korade, AGP for the respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. P.R. Katneshwarkar, advocate for the respondents No. 3 and 4. .... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 25th June, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. The petitioner alleges that there was no service of notice and, therefore, enquiry under section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 (for short, “the MCS Act”) is vitiated. The main plank of the petitioner is on the ground that there was absence of opportunity and principles of natural justice have been violated. The learned AGP has produced relevant postal envelopes and the file for temporary perusal, which is returned immediately. ( 2 ) 3. There appears endorsement on the postal envelope about due intimation given. The petition involves disputed questions of fact. Alternate remedy by way of revision under section 154 of the MCS Act is available. Mr. Talhar would submit that the petitioner may avail alternate remedy but there is difficult to deposit 50 per cent of the amount immediately. The petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy and by way of concession, he is granted interim protection. No recovery to be effected for four (4) weeks. Thereafter, he may file the revision application if so advised. [V.R. KINGAONKAR] JUDGE NPJ/wp371-10