IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5927 of 2009 PROF.SUSHIL MOHAN PRASAD, SON OF LATE MADAN MOHAN PRASAD, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT C-001, GARDEN APARTMENT, VAISHALI, P.S. INDIRAPURAM, GHAZIABAD (UTTAR PRADESH), RETIRED FROM THE POST OF PROF- IN-CHARGE AND HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS IN P.G. CENTRE, SAHARSA ---PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR. 4. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA. 5. THE REGISTRAR, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA. 6. THE FINANCE OFFICER, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA. 7. THE PROF.-IN-CHARGE, P.G. CENTRE, SAHARSA. ----RESPONDENTS ----------- For the Petitioner : Messrs Arvind Kumar Verma & Shanti Pratap, Advocates For the S t a t e : Mr Rajesh Kumar Sinha, A.C. to G.P. 20 For B.N. Mandal University :Mr Hemendra Prasad Singh, Advocate ------ 2. 12.5.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Hemendra Prasad Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-University as also the learned counsel for the State. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has received all the retiral dues upon his retirement. However, though the pension is payable to him with effect from February, 1995, but the University started giving the same from September, 2005 onwards and is still giving the pension. As such the claim is with regard to arrears of pension for the period February, 1995 to August, 2005. It is submitted that representation has been 2 filed on 26th of June, 2008 for redressal of his aforesaid grievances before the Vice-Chancellor of the University. However, his grievance has remained unredressed. Learned counsel for the respondent-University submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall be looked into. In the above circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to file a representation before the Vice-Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura (respondent no.4) within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order. In case such a representation is filed, the respondent no.4 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)