IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9685 of 2009 PUSHPA KUMARI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 3. 26.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner against the selction of respondent no. 11 on the post of Anganbari Sewika is that she hold the qualification from Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Allahabad which was not recognized by the State of Bihar. Learned counsel for the State points out that this Court with reference to a decision of the State Government not to recognize the qualification has held the Government decision to be perspective in nature. These facts are completely wanting in this writ application. If so advised, the petitioner may pursue her remedies before the District Programme Officer when if she places all necessary materials, the District Programme Officer shall examine the appointment of the petitioner vis-à-vis Respondent no. 11 in light of the law laid down by this Court. If the petitioner files such application within a period of 30 days containing full materials and particulars of the discussions contained in this order, only in that event is the District Programme Officer 2 required to dispose the same by a reasoned and speaking order after hearing all concerned within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)