^ < iifitF-itpyi ^^.^ a^ ^ ^w; te.,1 C .(. . looL^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION fS1 N0. -^43 OF2008 PETITIONER ^,-te-<..-" ^%-""" ^M^ , (^:7<^(.>' ^w^--y ^-"Kailash PrasadGypta S/o Late Shri Rajendra Prasad Gupta, Aged about 61 years, R/o Plot No. 52/1500, Kelo Vihar, In front of S. K. Chandra's house, Raigarh, Tahsil & District Raigarh (C.G.). ^ •^ RESPONDENTS VERSUS / .QO'>^ 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ,\i \^2' The Joint Director, Accounts Treasury and Pension, Bilaspur (C.G.) ^^.^ ^:'^ ^'^' 3] The Block Education Officer, Tamnar, Tahsil- Gharghora, District- Raigarh (C.G.). 4] The District .Education Officer, Raigarh, Tahsil & District- Raigarh (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA^OR ISSUENCE OFWRIT OR WRITS, ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS UNDER THE FACTS AND CIR^UMDTANCES OF THE CASE. ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETITION (S) No. 4043 of2008 Kailash Prasad Gupta. u RESPONDENT8 VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER AR1ICLE 226 OF 'IBE CONSTITLTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shii Satish K. Agmliotri. J. Present: Shri S.K.Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri N.N.Roy, Panel La^yerforthe State/respondents. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 05th day ofApriL 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the retum filed by the State/tespondents, and letter dated 13.12.2010 (^yiexiire Ry/l), the gilevance ofthe petitioner stands satislied and nothing remains for adjudication. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side does not controvert the above submission. 3. In view ofthe above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become iiifmctuous. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ainit