IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45337 of 2009 1. RABINDRA KUMAR RAI, SON OF SHYAM NARAYAN RAI 2. RAJESH KUMAR RAI, SON OF BADRI NARAYAN RAI 3. DHARMENDRA KUMAR RAI, SON OF BADRI NARAYAN RAI 4. MOST. RESHMA DEVI, WIFE OF LATE SHYAM NARAYAN RAI. ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE BORHA, P.S. KISHANPUR, DISTRICT SUPAUL. ------- PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------- OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2 22.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 323, 341, 342, 379, 498A, 504 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner no. 1 is the brother-in-law, petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are the nephew and petitioner no. 4 is the mother-in-law of the victim lady. Learned counsel refers to annexure-3 which is an order passed by the S.D.J.M., Supaul by which the husband and the elder brother had been granted bail on the ground that the matter has been compromised between husband and wife. Considering this aspect of the matter, petitioners namely Rabindra Kumar Rai, Rajesh Kumar Rai, Dharmendra Kumar Rai and Most. Reshma Devi are directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period - 2 - of six weeks in connection with Complaint Case No. 4(C) of 1999 on furnishing bail bonds of rupees ten thousand each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Supaul subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )