IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18221 of 2009 RANJAN RAI @ RANJAN ROY Son of Late Bhagwan Rai, resident of Village Tetar Tola Kothiya, P.S. Shahpur, District Patna. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 1/9/2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. Apparently this case is no longer remains under sections 460 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code, inasmuch as, one person injured in course of the occurrence has also subsequently succumbed to his injuries and therefore the petitioner now is an accused in a substantive case also for an offence under section 396 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner being a named accused in the First Information Report has also been identified by number of witnesses and therefore is not entitled for bail for the present. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. The trial court, however, is directed to ensure that trial of the petitioner is taken up out of turn and disposed of expeditiously preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. In the event, trial of the petitioner is not concluded within the aforesaid period, the petitioner will have liberty to first move the court below and the court below will be under obligation to record reasons for not concluding the trial and only thereafter the petitioner shall have liberty to move this Court. Abhay Kumar (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)