IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4093 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4093 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4093 OF 2007 Dr. Sujit Ray .... Applicant versus Rikam Foods & ors. ...... Respondent. Mr. A.P. Mundargi Sr. Adv. for the applicant. Mr. p.A.Pol APP for State. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 25TH JANUARY, 2008 DATED; 25TH JANUARY, 2008 DATED; 25TH JANUARY, 2008 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. There exists an efficacious remedy in the form of revision before the Sessions court. Hence I decline to entertain the application at this stage. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this application is prosecuted bonafidely and if and in case the application is not entertained, the applicant would face problem in regard to the limitation for filing of the revision. It is obvious that as the applicant was bonafidely prosecuting this application, the period spent need to be condoned on a proper application being made. The learned counsel for the applicant assures this court that the revision be filed within a period of two weeks from today and if it is so filed, the revisional court would sympathetically consider the application for condonation of delay. Criminal Application is summarily dismissed. C.C. expedited. ....