IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1675 of 2009 BIMAL KUAMR TIWARY @ BIMAL TIWARY S/O RAMASHANKAR TIWARY R/O THORI PANDEPURE, P.S. + P.O.- MURAR, DISTRICT BUXAR. Versus BABITA DEVI D/O GOPAL TIWARY W/O BIMAL KUMAR TIWARY R/O VILLAGE + P.O.- BARKA DIYAMAN, P.S. KRISHNA BRAHAM, DIST- BUXAR. For the Petitioner:Mr.Awanish Kumar Pandey,Adv. ----------- 2. 21.1.2010. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the civil revision as the same is not maintainable as per the specific bar under Section 19(5) of the Family Courts Act,1984 that has been interpreted by Division Bench of this Court in Jagdish Prasad Chouhan v. Bhuneshwar Chouhan and anr.,reported in 2009(4) BBCJ, 442, holding civil revisions not maintainable against the interlocutory orders passed by Family Courts. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner wants to avail any other remedy, if available under law to him. In that view of the matter, the civil revision is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J.) N.H./ - 2 -