IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6106 of 2009 LALITA SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 14.5.2009 Although the petitioner has not appeared to press this writ petition which has been treated as Public Interest Litigation but after hearing learned Additional Advocate General 4, we have perused the relevant paragraphs of the writ petition and found that in paragraph 5 the petitioner has made a clear averment that he is personally aggrieved because of non-selection for appointment in the district of Buxar by the District Magistrate, Buxar. He has alleged that junior candidates at serial 25 to 53 were appointed. It has further been submitted that petitioner has not been given any promotion. At various places in the petition, a general grievance has been raised that after 1979, all appointments in the State of Bihar in class III and class IV posts have been made illegally and, therefore, all appointments be cancelled. In the facts of the case, we are of the view that 2 petitioner has some personal grievances and it would not be proper to proceed with this writ petition by way of Public Interest Litigation. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. But if petitioner is so advised, he may pursue his personal grievances through appropriate proceeding in according with law. (Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ.) (Dr Ravi Ranjan, J.) sk