1 S.B.Civil Contempt Petition NO.110/09 S.B. Sharma v. Miss Nilima Johri IN SBCivil Writ Petition NO.2499/05. Date of order: 5.10.2009. HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. M. Mridul Sr. Advocate with Mr. PS Chundawat, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Joshi for the respondent. ... Heard learned counsel for the parties. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2499/09 was allowed with the directions to decide the claim of the petitioner in accordance with clarification dated 27.2.2007 (Annex.14). The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner's claim has not been decided in accordance with the clarification dated 27.2.2007. However, the respondents submitted the decision dated 24.4.2009 wherein the respondents have considered the clarification dated 27.2.2007. In view of the above fact that the respondents have considered the clarification dated 27.2.2007 and have passed the order, therefore, if the petitioner is aggrieved against the said order, then he can challenge the order dated 24.4.2009 and I do not find that any case of 2 committing contempt of this Court has been made out. Therefore, this Contempt Petition is dismissed and the notices are discharged. ( PRAKASH TATIA),J. mlt.