IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 505 of 2004 (M/B) Shree Bankey Bihari Ispat Private Ltd., (A company incorporated under the Companies Act), through its Director Jagdish Chwala, S/o Late Sri Jaman Das, R/o D-13, Hari Mandir Gali, Rudrapur, Tehsil Kichha, District Udham Singh Nagar. …………. Petitioners. Versus 1. Union of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Through its Secretary, New Delhi. 2. Uttaranchal Power Corporation, through its Managing Director, Urja Bhawan, Kanwali Road, Dehradun. 3. State Industrial Development Corporation of Uttaranchal Ltd., through its Secretary, Dehradun. 4. Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division, Rudrapur. 5. State of Uttaranchal through Chief Secretary, Dehradun. 6. Secretary, Industries, State of Uttaranchal. ………. Respondents. Mr. Vijay Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner. None for respondent No.1. Mr. B.D. Upadhyaya, Advocate for respondents Nos. 2 and 4. Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for respondents Nos.5 and 6. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. Vijay Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner. None for respondent No.1. Mr. B.D. Upadhyaya, Advocate for respondents Nos. 2 and 4. Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for respondents. Nos. 5 and 6. 2. Mr. B.D. Upadhyaya, the learned counsel for respondent No. 2 Uttaranchal Power Corporation submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner Company seeking a direction to the respondents to provide electric power connection of 4,000 KVA to the petitioner’s Unit has, now, become infructuous, as such a connection has already been provided to the petitioner during the pendency of the writ petition. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 09.06.2006 09.06.2006 G