IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 1197 of 2010 Sushmita Rai ………. Applicant Versus Mahant Om Prakash @ Balanand and others ..…. Respondents Present : Sri Lalit Tiwari, Advocate present for the applicant. Dated : 15th December, 2010 Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J. Sri Lalit Tiwari, Advocate present for the applicant. Heard. This application has been moved under section 482 Cr.P.C. by the applicant for challenging the order dated 03.06.2010 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar vide which respondents have not been summoned for the offence punishable under section 3 (1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities), Act, 1989. However, they have been summoned for the offences punishable under section 147, 452, 323, 504 and 506 of IPC. Perusal of the impugned order shows that sufficient ground is given by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar for not summoning the respondent for the offence punishable under section 3 (1/x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities), Act. 2 From the complaint and statement of Sushmita Rai, complainant made under section 200 of Cr.P.C., it is revealed that parties are involved in a dispute with regard to the tenancy of premises. Both parties are living in the same premises. The dispute did not take place on account of complainant belonging to Schedule caste and therefore no offence under section 3 (1/x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities), Act is made out. Accordingly, I do not find any illegality in the order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar and find no merit in the application, hence, the same is dismissed. (Nirmal Yadav, J.) JKJ 15.12.2010