HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR W.P.(SlNo. 3091 of 2007 PETITIONERS 1 Mohd. NasirAge 43 years, S/o Late Shri Mohd. Idris, By occupation - Asstt. Teacher, Aajuiiiaa Hiadi/Urdu Pri. School Jagdalpur, Distt- Bastar(C.G.) 2 Mohd. Shoeb Ansari Age 41 year S/o Sbri Mohd. Ismail Ansari, Occupation - Asstt. Teacher Anjumaa Hindi/Urdu Pri. School Jagdalpur, Distt.- Bastar (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1 State of Chliattisgarh tbrough Secretary, Departinent of School Educatiou, Mautralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Director of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawau, Raipur (C.G.) 3 District Education OfScer, Jagdalpur, Distt.- Bastar (C.G.) 4 Secretary, Anjuinan Islamia Conuiiittee Jagdalpur, Distt.-Bastar (C.G.) (Writ Petitjon under Article 226 pf the Constitution of India) Appearance: Shri Azad Siddiqui, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Yashwant Siagh, Govt. Advocate, for the State on advance copy. ORAL ORDBR (29.08.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard on adinissiou. Leanued counsel for the petitioners subnuts that fhe petitioners have passed B.T.I. examination on their own expenses, fherefore, fhey are entifled to receive two advance increiaents according to circulars dated 24.12.1998 aad 01.03.1999. He also subnuts fhat in many identical niatters, the petitions have beeu allowed iu terms of fhe order passed ia fhe case of Ycishwan.t Kumar Bhdrad.ww Vs. SSunlcwdl CortiQrcM.on, Dura and euwthei^SQOGJIS BSPJS-CG 96}. He subinits that the case of fhe petitioners are squarely covered by the said Judgiuent. W.P.fSLNo. 3091 of 2007 This legal position is not disputed by fhe leamed counsel for fhe State. However, he subniits that the order may be passed in terms of the said judginent, but it shall be subjectsd to verification rcgarding petitioners' such qualification. Accordingly, this writ petition is aUowed ia tenns of fhe order passed in case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Murdcapal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to verification of the facts as to whefher fhe petitioners had acquired B.T.I. Exaaaiaation Certi&cate oa fheir own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 aad further whether fhey have been. paid two advaiice iacrements or not. The petition stands finaUy disposed' of. No order as to COStS. r. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti