IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 15TH MARCH 2011 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 1877 of 2011() ----------------------------- CRIME No.23/11 OF PERAMBRA POLICE STATION .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED :- -------------------------------------- RATHEESH, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.KUNHIRAMAN, VILANGIL MEETHAL HOUSE, MUYIPPOTH, KOYILANDY TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.ABDUL JALEEL RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT :- ------------------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR, PERAMBRA POLICE STATION, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: jvt V. RAMKUMAR, J. ----------------------------------------------- Bail Appln.No.1877 of 2011 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 15th day of March, 2011 ORDER Petitioner, who is the 1st accused in Crime No.23/2011 of Perambra Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 366A and 506(I) I.P.C, seeks his enlargement on bail. The petitioner was arrested on 07.02.2011. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioner, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. Dated this the 15th day of March, 2011. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. dmb