1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2044/98 Ghasi Ram & Ors. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. 19.2.2007 Hon’ble Mr.Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri D.V. Tholia for petitioners. Shri Virendra Dangi for respondent. This writ petition has been filed by five licensees of New Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Nawalgarh with the grievance that while they have been made to shift to the new yard of Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, but many of the traders are still continuing their business from old mandi and have not shifted. Their grievance is that in spite of drawing attention of the authorities specifically the Secretary of the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Nawalgarh, steps are not being taken to ensure that all the 2 shop owners shift to the new yard so that the mandi becomes functional. On the other hand, Shri Virendra Dangi, the learned counsel for the respondents submits that this writ petition was filed way back in the year 1998 and during the intervening period most of the traders have already shifted and action shall be taken to ensure that the remaining traders also shift to the new yard and those who do not shift, action in accordance with law shall be taken against them. In the light of the clarification given by the learned counsel for the respondents, I do not deem it appropriate to continue the present writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the observations that the 3 respondents may proceed according to the provisions contained in Section 4, 14 and 28 of the Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1961 and the rules framed thereunder. (Mohammad Rafiq),J. RS/-