..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1368 OF 2007 1.Mrs.Pooja Devang Gandhi, & 2.Devang Kantilal Gandhi. ...Applicants. Versus Versus Versus Sr.Inspecot of Police and Anr. ...Respondents. .... Mr.M.M.Vashi,Adv. for the Applicants. Mr.Rajesh More, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 18th April, 2007. DATED : 18th April, 2007. DATED : 18th April, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicants and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.178 of 2007 of Turbhe Police Station. The said case is under Sections 380, 454, 341 of IPC. 3. The learned APP seeks time upto 30.4.2007 to take instructions. The learned Advocate for the applicants states that in the meantime, the applicants may be protected. ..(2).. 4. It is noticed that the applicants have directly approached this Court for anticipatory bail. In my opinion, it would be appropriate that the applicants prefer necessary application for anticipatory bail before the concerned Sessions Court. Liberty is granted to the applicants to prefer necessary application for anticipatory bail before the concerned Sessions Court. 5. To enable the applicants to prefer said application before the concerned Sessions Court, the applicants are granted interim protection upto 30th April, 2007. In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the applicants to be released on bail on furnishing one surety in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each. It is made clear that this order of interim protection will remain in operation only upto 30th April, 2007. 6. Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)