In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh RFA No. 3801 of 2006 (O&M) Smt. Savitri and others ..... Appellants vs State of Haryana and others .... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: None for the appellants. Mr. Ashish Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. The landowners are in appeal against the award of the learned court below seeking further enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly, the facts are that the land situated within the revenue estate of village Jasania, Tehsil and District Sirsa, was acquired by the State of Haryana vide notification dated 9.2.2001 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, `the Act') for construction of Gigo Rani Distributory. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, `the Collector') vide his award dated 18.6.2002 assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ` 1,00,000/- per acre for nehri, ` 80,000/- per acre for chahi, ` 50,000/- per acre for barani and ` 3,00,000/- per acre for gair mumkin kind of land. Aggrieved against the award of the Collector, the land owners filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below upheld the award of the Collector. It is this award of the learned Reference Court which is impugned in the present appeal. It is not disputed by learned counsel for the State that the issues raised in the present appeal are squarely covered by judgment of this court in RFA No. 3543 of 2006 Ram Sarup and others vs The State of Haryana and another, decided on 15.12.2010. Accordingly, for the reasons recorded in Ram Sarup's case (supra), the appeal is disposed of in the same terms. 24.2.2011 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge