CRM-M-26232-2011 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26232-2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:27.09.2011 Rajan Arora @ Darshan Singh Bhatia @ Sanjay Bhatia @ Lathi ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. P.S.Sullar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sagar Deswal, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate, for the complainant. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) Affidavit of ASI Chander Bhan, Investigating Officer, is filed in Court and copy is given to the petitioner. According to the above affidavit, the petitioner is involved in 4 other cases registered vide FIR No.102 dated 29.07.2010, under Sections 406, 420, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC at Police Station Barara, District Ambala, Haryana, FIR No.336 dated 20.11.2010, under Sections 420, 465, 467, 471, 474 of IPC at Police Station Zirakpur, District Mohali, Punjab, FIR No.14 dated 30.01.2010, under Sections 379 IPC at Police Station Badshahpur, District Gurgaon and FIR No.30 dated 24.01.2010, under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC at Police Station Sadar, Gurgaon. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is on bail in all the aforesaid 4 cases. This fact is conceded by the learned State Counsel. The allegation against the petitioner in the present case is that he had taken the car of the complainant against of Rs.4,75,000/-, out of which Rs.50,000/- was given in cash and Rs.4,25,000/- was given by cheque and he further sold the car to co-accused on 19.01.2010 for a sum [ 1 CRM-M-26232-2011 (O&M) of Rs.4,08,000/-. The cheque given by the petitioner to the complainant, however, had bounced for which the complainant had already filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which is pending. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the car in question has already been returned to the complainant and the petitioner is in custody since 26.05.2011. He further submits that the challan in this case has already been presented. After hearing both the learned counsel for the parties, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, but without any observation on the merits, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail by the learned Trial Court on his furnishing bail bonds to its satisfaction. September 27, 2011. ( Rakesh Kumar Jain ) vinod* Judge [ 2