WP(C) 4300/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA Heard Mr. AR Bhuiyan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard M r. RK Bora, learned State counsel appearing for the respondents. Considering the grievance raised in this petition and as agreed to by th e learned counsel appearing for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of a t the admission stage itself. The petitioner’s case in brief is that father of the petitioner namely l ate Anwar Ali Choudhury while working as Habilder in the Arm Branch in the estab lishment of respondent No.3, the Superintendent of Police, Cachar died in harnes s on 12.6.2000. After demise of the father of the petitioner, the family of the petitioner had to face immense financial hardship as there was no other Govt. se rvant or earning member in their family. Being eligible and qualified, the petit ioner applied for appointment on compassionate ground by submitting a representa tion on 31.7.01 before the respondent No.3. But the authority did not consider t he said representation. Therefore, the petitioner approached this Court by filin g a writ petition being WP(C) No.7621 of 2001. This Court vide order dated 19.10 .01 disposed of the said writ petition directing the respondent No.3 to dispose of the representation dated 31.7.01 filed by the petitioner for appointment on c ompassionate ground. After passing of the said order, several official communica tions were made, but, till date the petitioner’s case has not been considered. I nstead of appointing the petitioner on compassionate ground, pursuant to the afo resaid order dated 19.10.01, respondent No.2 vide his letter dated 13.2.02 direc ted the respondent No.3 to conduct the physical test/interview of the petitioner for the purpose of his appointment on compassionate ground for the post of Cons table and further directed the respondent No.3 to send the report alongwith the date of death and cause of death of the father of the petitioner. Petitioner als o approached the respondents, more particularly, respondent No.3 on several occa sions and requested him verbally to pass necessary order in compliance with the order passed by this Court, but, the same have evoked no response. In the meanwh ile, this Court vide judgment and order dated 3.8.06 passed in a batch of writ p etitions, the leading case being WP(C) No.3875/2005 (Achyut Ranjan Das & Ors. Vs - the Sate of Assam & Ors.) reported in 2006 (4) GLT 674, relating to compassion ate appointment fixed certain modalities and guidelines. Thereafter, the petitio ner again approached the respondent No.3 and requested the respondent No.3 to ap point him on compassionate ground and place his case before the District Level S election Committee (’DLSC’ for short) as mandated in the aforesaid case Achyut R anjan Das (supra). But, till date, the petitioner’s case has not been placed bef ore the DLSC. In view of the aforesaid background, the limited prayer of the petitione r is for a direction to the respondent No.3 to place the case of the petitioner before the DLSC, respondent No.4 at an early date. Considering the limited prayer so made by the petitioner, respondent No. 3 is directed to place the case of the petitioner before the DLSC forthwith so t hat the same can be considered in the next meeting to be held by the DLSC. In vi ew of the judgment and order passed in WP(C) No.2620/2009 (Foziron Nessa Vs. Sta te of Assam and Ors.) the DLSC shall intimate the decision to be arrived at rega rding appointment of the petitioner on compassionate ground to the petitioner in his given address. The petitioner shall submit a certified copy of this order a longwith the copies of the orders passed in Achyut Ranjan Das and Faziron Nessa (supra) and the relevant documents, filled up format etc. required in case of co mpassionate appointment before the respondent No.3 for doing the needful. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.