Civil Writ Petition No. 13555 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Writ Petition No. 13555 of 2010 Date of Decision: 9.8.2010 State Bank Employees Co-operative Group Housing Society Limited …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Respondent No.4 approached the Assistant Registrar, Co- operative Societies, Gurgaon, with a grievance that the Society was deliberately not allotting plot to him. The Assistant Registrar, while deciding the reference vide order dated 3.5.2007 (Annexure P6), took the following facts into consideration:- A) That the name of respondent No.4 is entered at serial No.37 of the list of the Society, which was signed by the President. B) That in the year 1999, respondent No.4 had deposited a sum of Rs.75,000/- and a receipt was issued in his favour. C) K.K.Kapoor, the then President of the Society, had Civil Writ Petition No. 13555 of 2010 2 issued a letter from which it was apparent that respondent No.4 was a Member of the Society. D) That on 20.12.2001, 6.5.2002, 11.1.2003 and 9.2.2005, respondent No.4 had deposited various amounts. Along with the above said facts, the Assistant Registrar drew an adverse inference against the petitioner-Society for not producing the original record inspite of the opportunity provided. Aggrieved against the same, the petitioner-Society filed an appeal. The Appellate Authority concurred with the findings of fact recorded by the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, vide impugned order dated 16.1.2008 (Annexure P9). Thereafter, the petitioner-Society availed the remedy of revision. The Revisional Authority, not only upheld the concurrent finding of fact, but also found no infirmity in the orders passed by the Assistant Registrar and Deputy Registrar (Appellate Authority). The writ Court is constrained not to entertain the present writ petition as the disputed questions of fact cannot be determined by this Court and the authorities below on facts have drawn conclusions against the petitioner. Hence, there is no merit in the present writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed, in limine. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge August 9, 2010 “DK”