IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 56 OF 2008 Mrs.Laxmi Narayan Shiveshwarkar ......Applicant/Orig.Comp V/S. 1. Shri.Pradhyuman Vasudev Dhabhokar .....Resp no.1/Orig.Accused 2. The State of Maharashtra .....Resp no.2. ---------- Mr.AnilKumar Patil, adv.for applicant. Mr.C.S.Joshi, adv.for respondent no.1. Ms.S.V.Gajare, APP for State-respondent no.2. CORAM:- SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED :- 5TH OCTOBER, 2009. P.C. : 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. This Criminal Revision Application arises out of the judgment and order dated 2nd November, 2007 of the District Court, Nasik, upholding conviction of respondent no.1 under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act. The impugned judgment also confirms the sentence of fine imposed upon the respondent no.1, but sets aside the order of his simple imprisonment for a period of 3 months in case of default in payment of fine. 3. The applicant, who is the original complainant contends that the appellate court has erred in setting aside the sentence awarded to respondent no.1 of undergoing simple imprisonment for a period of 3 months in the event of default of payment of fine. According to her, this sentence awarded by the learned Magistrate ought to have been confirmed by the appeal court. 4. I have heard the parties and perused the impugned judgment. In my opinion, there is no error or illegality in the same. The lower appellate court has taken a reasonable view of the matter and passed appropriate directions. Hence, the Criminal Revision Application is dismissed. [SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J]