[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVN. NO.608 OF 2007 Sou.Vaishali Vijay Aadke ..Applicant Vs. Shri.Rahul Anandrao Rasal and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.Rahul Kulkarni Advocate for Applicant Mr.S.R.Shinde APP for State Mr.D.H.Pawar Advocate for Respondent No.2 ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 25, 2008 DATE : NOVEMBER 25, 2008 DATE : NOVEMBER 25, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant-original accused, the learned advocate for the respondent no.2-original complainant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The complainant and accused are present in Court. 2. By judgment and order dated 4.7.2005 the applicant came to be convicted under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act by the learned Judicial Magistrate F.C. Peth Vadgaon in SCC No.652 of 2001. Appeal preferred by the applicant came to be dismissed, hence, this revision. [-2-] 3. The learned advocate for the complainant states that during the pendency of this revision, matter has been amicably settled between the parties and in view of settlement, the complainant has prayed that the matter be compounded and the applicant be acquitted thereunder. Complainant has also filed affidavit to the above effect. The said affidavit is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. In view of the fact that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act is compounded and the applicant is acquitted thereunder. The judgment and order of conviction dated 4.7.2005 passed by the learned J.M.F.C. Peth Vadgaon in SCC No.652 of 2001 is set aside. So also the judgment and order of the learned Sessions Judge confirming the same is set aside. 4. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]