‘i5~12u2w§ Shri Praieek Sharma, counsel rori he petitioners; Shri ‘v'fy’S. Moort‘ny, Dy. Aavocz Dubey, Gcivt Advocata ’for the State of C Snri AS‘nish Shrivastava, Advccate Heam B‘y" thi$ paition umder Artide 226‘ the prayer sought for is the compasg!ona the deafh oir‘he father ofthe petitioner on i‘t is contended that before re Pradeeh haG‘ tormuiated the guideiinesr The further contention rs that those gum Cf Chhattiegarh after reorgamzatroh. it is Chhattiegarh however sewed oertarh the hot to make appointmehte as me poucy or so. The matter remained stand and L has been framed by the State of unhat those who died'atter formation of the Sta their oases wiii be oonstdereo in aocordar The matter wae adjourned on the State Counset to eeek rhstruotrorte. Learned Dv. Advocate beneri Chhattiegarh now deotded to consroerai before of reorganization of the State re. and as such the present-matter Is coverer 'u 2'27 of the Constitution or” india‘ te apporntmeht consequent upon 24ft "r h we”). organtzatron, State or Nraonya tor oompaesrohate appointment. tines remain in force in the State aieo contended that the State ot tructione after the reorganization was under consideration tor year itimateiy on ’iO»6~;2GCI3 the ponoy iegarhg‘ According to the poiioy, rte of Chhattiegarh i e, t—‘i i~2uou ce Witn the poncy. eariier dates eo as to enabie the I 1i, eu'omite that the State ot those caees prior to three yeare who died on ”Mt-1%? onwards Shri iv oort'ny, iearneo‘ Dy. Advc i Within the zone of coneioeration; V \ tte Generaix With Shh Sandeep hhattisgarhr’respondeht not r , fOf Fe$pOHGEHIS HQZ 64 é. oate Generate submite that the curred "i ~’r :‘i —"i ear onwards wouid \ t ‘ oaeee in which death otthelempioyee oc / [thew ,\ cioeumemts and the Oiher formaimes wm OperatlOH m ‘S‘UbmlSSIOH OT TOFmS, Learned oouneei appearing To pemiener Wiii co-operate and appear 1: mirectea. m VEew of the subm!$$lons mam fhe partles, Wlthoui expresamg amy 0pm Qpinicm of this: Court, ends Qfjustice wii the authantles todemaeme case or In poimy and n€0e58ary orders be pawea petitioner is aiso direeted i0 render Que made ciear that ir' any grievance etiit remains; the petitioner may avaii me gfiirng or me petition, v remedy avaliabie under the iaw rncruarn Subject to the atoreaaid obser‘i‘atione onidirectione, tnzo petition erty. I Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge grands dispoeed Of with The aforesaid ii‘r uemrrea copy as per rures‘ )KWy be scrutinized and examined in accordance with the poiicy as per the poiioy prevalent at that time. Learned counsei for the State eubmite that the petitioner shouid aieo render equai co- 3h are requrred r’er ‘rhepurpose. the petlrloner suomrre mar rne‘ efore the autheritiee as and when , 'r a by ieamed couneei appearrng for on on the mente of the caee, rn rne be eerved rr' a drreciren rs grverr IO a petitioner in accordance wrm rne on or before 5‘3“ Aorii, Erl‘ré‘ja The oo~operati0n to the au'tnoririee. ir ie‘ ih [we area N