1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.892 OF 2003 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.892 OF 2003 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.892 OF 2003 Bimal Thakkar : Petitioner. versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. : Respondents. Mr.Jeevan Goge i/by Mahimkar & Mahimkar for the petitioner. Smt.S.D.Shinde, APP, for the State. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE DATED : MARCH 18, 2006. DATED : MARCH 18, 2006. DATED : MARCH 18, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. By this petition, the petitioner - original accused has challenged the order dated 19th July 2001 of issuance of process under Section 465 of the Indian Penal Code against him. This Court, (Coram : Smt.V.K.Tahilramani,J), in the case of V.K.Jain and others v/s. Pratap V.K.Jain and others v/s. Pratap V.K.Jain and others v/s. Pratap 2 2 2 Padode and another reported in 2005(3) Mh.L.J. Padode and another reported in 2005(3) Mh.L.J. Padode and another reported in 2005(3) Mh.L.J. 778 778 778 held that the power of High Court under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code should not be exercised when efficacious remedy of preferring revision before the Sessions Court against the order of issuing process is available to the applicants. Therefore, the petitioner/accused should approach the Sessions Court by preferring revision in respect of the order of the Magistrate issuing process. In this view of the matter, this petition is not maintainable. It is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Sessions Court within three weeks from today. Ad-interim relief to continue till then. Needless to say that the time spent in this petition will be taken into consideration by the Sessions Court while entertaining that revision. [D.G.DESHPANDE] [D.G.DESHPANDE] [D.G.DESHPANDE]