1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 161/2007 Ishwar Singh Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Date of Order :: 17.12.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr Girish Sankhla, for the petitioner/s. Mr Dr. G.R. Kalla, Govt. Advocate, for the respondents. ... By this petition for writ a direction is sought for the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Physical Training Instructor Gr.II by extending 15% bonus marks to him on the count of participation in national level tournaments. The factual matrix necessary to be noticed is that the respondents invited applications from eligible candidates for the purpose of appointment as Physical Training Instructor – II in the year 2003 and the process of selection in pursuant thereto was initiated and completed in the year 2007. The petitioner claimed for grant of 15% bonus marks as per the Rajasthan Sports Council Circular dated 7.1.1999 against participation in national level tournaments. As per the petitioner the documents Annexures 4, 5, 6 and 7 are the certificates relating to his participation in national level tournaments. The document Annexure-4 is a certificate of participation in some Sadbhavana Run organized by National Youth Students Association. Annexure-5 is a certificate regarding successful completion of the 2 petitioner for Kabaddi Officials (Referees & Umpires) Test Examination held on 7.5.1995 at Nagpur. The document Annexure-6 is a certificate issued by Nagpur Municipal Corporation relating to participation in All India Mayor's Gold Cup Football Tournament and the document Annexure-7 is certificate of Honour/Participation issued by Rajiv Sports Foundation, Nagpur but it no where discloses in which sport the petitioner participated. It simply mentions participation in 10 km group/performance. None of the certificates establishes participation of the petitioner in any national level tournament conducted by recognized sports body. In view of it, the claim of the petitioner getting 15% bonus marks against participation in national level tournament is absolutely misconceived. The petition for writ is devoid of merit. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal '