1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Letter No. 662 OF 2007 (In W.P. 2386/06) Sau. Renubai @ Renukabai Sahebrao Dange v. Devidas Ganpat Padole & anr. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders CORAM: A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 12th JULY, 2007. Seen the letter dated 18.6.07 received on 7.7.2007 from the Joint Civil Judge, Jr.Dn., Morshi. The letter does not indicate the time that is required by the trial Court. The letter further states “the learned counsel of defendant parties had filed pursis Ex.121 vide which they have intimated this Court that the suit cannot be decided within time since the evidence of the defendant have not yet been completed.” This is the case where the trial Court has acted on the pursis filed by the defendants rather than on the 2 order made by this Court on 3.7.2006 to decide the suit within six months. The trial Court has not endeavoured to decide the suit as per directions issued by this Court, but has chosen to act upon the pursis Ex.121 filed by the defendants for issuing this letter. Be that as it may, Registry is directed to censure the trial Court accordingly. Time is however extended by another six months within which the trial Court shall complete hearing of the suit and decide the same according to law, whether the parties co-operate or not. JUDGE /TA/