IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.3380 of 2010 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: November 30, 2011 Ritesh Gautam …..Petitioner versus Smt. Sumita Gautam and another .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.R.K. Bagga, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Vikas Arora, Advocate for the respondents .. RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) This is a revision petition against order dated 8.11.2010 passed by Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar whereby maintenance payable by the petitioner was enhanced. Learned counsel for the parties submit that during the pendency of dispute, matter was referred to Lok Adalat wherein a compromise was arrived at between the parties. They seek to place on record a photocopy of the order passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Yamuna Nagar pursuant to compromise. The prayer is accepted and order is taken on record as Mark-A. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of compromise he does not press this petition. Needless to observe that compromise is in the interest of parties. Any further adjudication on merits of the case would be a futile exercise. Moreover, no cause of action survives. The petition is disposed of, dispute having been amicably settled. November 30, 2011 ( RAJAN GUPTA ) pc JUDGE