IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION NO.981 OF 2004 Bijendra Singh ..Petitioner. Vs. Amarjit Singh Mongia & Ors. ..Respondents. ... Mr. S.S. Padmashali for the Petitioner. Mr. M.S. Mhambrey for Respondent No.1. ... CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 14th September, 2006. P.C. : The Petitioner has challenged an order passed by the Competent Authority on an application under Section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 which was confirmed in revision by the Commissioner, Konkan Division on a revision application under Section 44 of the Act. Rule 636 of the High Court (O.S. ) Rules does not list the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 as one of the statutory enactments with reference to which the jurisdiction to entertain a petition against an order of adjudication would lie before a Single Judge on the Original Side. The Petition will have to be transferred to the Appellate Side for being placed before the appropriate Court. The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary steps.