IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 10TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 19TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 29982 of 2011(W) ------------------------------------- PETITIONERS : - ------------------------ 1. LITTIL PUDUKKATTUKARAN, AGED 25 YEARS, KIZHKKEPPURAM, ARANATTUKARA, THRISSUR - 680 618. 2. TITTO, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O JOY A.S., AVARAN HOUSE, AMBAKKAD, PUZHAKKAL P.O., THRISSUR - 680 553. BY ADVS. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) RESPONDENTS : - -------------------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, THENJIPALAM, CALICUT - 673 635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, THENJIPALAM, CALICUT - 673 635. R1 - R2 BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, S.C FOR CALICUT UNIVERSITY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 29982 of 2011(W) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT P1 : COPY OF THE HALL TICKET ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER DATED NIL. EXT P2 : COPY OF THE MARK SHEET RECEIVED THROUGH INTERNET, DATED NIL. EXT P3 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1st PETITIONER FOR REVALUATION, DATED 14.03.2011. EXT P4 : COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DATED 14.03.2011. EXT P5 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2nd PETITIONER FOR REVALUATION DATED 14.03.2011. EXT P6 : COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT RECEIVED BY THE 2nd PETITIONER, DATED 14.03.2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE DMR/- ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).29982/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 10th day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of certain papers in the VIth semester B.Tech Degree Examination vide Exts.P3 and P5 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs /true copy/ P.A. To Judge