IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.182 OF 2009 M/s.Hemchand & Co. ..... Petitioner V/s. Mumbai Municipal Corporation and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.M.M.Vashi i/by M.P.Vashi & Associates, for the petitioner. Mrs.Geeta Jogalekar, for the B.M.C. Ms.Rupali Pawar i/by the Law Point for the respondent No.3. CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR & R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 22TH APRIL, 2009. P.C. 1. During the course of the hearing, it is submitted by Mr.Vashi that the respondent-Corporation has already removed the wall and the road has been widened to 30 feet. He submitted that the prayers made in the petition have become infructous. 2. At this stage, Mr.Vashi submitted that the respondent No.3 may not take any further steps regarding removal of other construction. In this behalf, it is pointed out that by way of appeal, proceedings are already pending before the City Civil Court under the Public Premises Eviction Act and status quo has been granted. In view of this, no restraining orders are required to be passed against the respondent No.3. 2. In view of the said submission of Mr.Vashi, the learned 2 counsel for the petitioner, we dispose of the petition as having become infructous. ( R.M.SAVANT, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )