IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3587 of 2011 Between: C. Yadaiah … Petitioner And M. Nehru Naidu … Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Sri M. Yeshwanth Kumar This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3587 of 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition arises out of order, dated 22.07.2011 in E.A.No.55 of 2011 in E.P.No.73 of 2007 in O.S.No.354 of 2004 on the file of the III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The petitioner, who is the judgment debtor, filed E.A.No.55 of 2011 under Order XXI Rule 26 read with Section 151 CPC to stay the execution proceedings. After considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court below dismissed E.A.No.55 of 2011. Questioning the said order, the petitioner filed the present Civil Revision Petition. The main ground on which the petitioner-Judgment debtor filed E.A.No.55 of 2011 to stay the execution proceedings is that the schedule property was attached by the Government under G.O.Ms.No.4, dated 06.01.2007 and therefore the said property cannot be sold in execution proceedings. As seen from the record, it is clear that the attachment order was made absolute on 09.11.2004 by the Court below, as the petitioner failed to furnish security as directed by the Court below. The Government issued G.O.Ms.No.4 attaching the schedule property on 06.01.2007, which is long after making the attachment absolute by the Court below. Therefore, the Court below has rightly held that the attachment of the property made absolute on 09.11.2004 prevails over the subsequent administrative order and that the said finding cannot be said to be incorrect or illegal. Under Order XXI Rule 26 CPC, the judgment debtor has to satisfy the Court with a sufficient cause to stay the execution proceedings. Since no sufficient cause is shown by the judgment debtor, there are no grounds to stay the execution proceedings. The Court below has rightly dismissed E.A.No.55 of 2001 and the same needs no interference by this Court. The Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merits and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU, J Date: 26.08.2011 ES