IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 986 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- DAHYABHAI @ BAKHIYO PRAHLADBHAI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MS SUBHADRA G PATEL for Petitioner MS HANSA PUNANI, APP for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 13/12/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT #. Rule. Ms.Hansa Punani waives service of Rule on behalf or respondents. #. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the ground given for rejection of the application of the petitioner for furlough leave no more survives as after this order, in the criminal case, reference of which has been made in the order aforesaid, the petitioner has been acquitted. #. If that fact is correct, then certainly the matter deserves to be reconsidered. In the result, this special criminal application and Rule is disposed of in the terms that the matter be reconsidered in the light of subsequent developments which have taken place after passing of that order and final order in the matter be passed within period of seven days from the date of receipt of writ of this order. No order as to costs. ....... (sunil)