IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX INCOME TAX INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1112 OF 2008 APPEAL NO. 1112 OF 2008 APPEAL NO. 1112 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax. ... Appellant. V/s. M/s.Premier Consolidated. ... Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta with P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. K.Shivram with P.K.Parida for the respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. and V.C.DAGA, JJ. and V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED : 6th October 2008. DATED : 6th October 2008. DATED : 6th October 2008. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent categorically states that the question of law involved in this appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court dated 8th August, 2008 in Income Tax Appeal No.18/2006 (C.I.T. v. M/s.Walfort Share & Stock Brokers Pvt.Ltd.) against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee. In view thereof, appeal stands dismissed. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)