IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12531 of 2009 SUNIL KUMAR SINGH @ SUNIL SINGH, S/O Vijay Kumar Singh, R/O Village Khala, P.S. Barauli, District Gopalganj. ………Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR …….Opposite Party ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shanti Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, A.P.P. 02/- 29-09-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This is an application seeking quashing of order dated 07.06.2008 passed by Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in Barauli P.S. Case No. 92 of 2007 taking cognizance for the offences under Sections 341/323/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The only ground taken against the impugned order during submission by learned counsel for the petitioner is that no offence is made out attracting Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor simply pointed out that after submission of charge-sheet cognizance has been taken for the offence against all the three named accused persons including the petitioner and the points raised here may effectively be considered at the time of 2 hearing on the point of charge before the trial court. Finding substance in submission made by learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this application stands disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to agitate all his points before the trial court, which shall considered and pass appropriate order in accordance with law and consonance with the materials. Praveen (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)