1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.591 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.1240 OF 2005 M. Maria Selvam ..Plaintiff V/s K. Regina (alias) Rani & anr. ..Defendants And Smt.Kismati Devi Satish Prajapati ..Applicant Ms.Malar Manoharan i/b.D.M.Manoharan & V. Jeganathan, Advocate, for the plaintiff Mr.Vivek Salunke, Advocate, for the applicant CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATE : 17TH DECEMBER, 2008 P.C. . The above Chamber Summons has been filed by the applicant for impleadment in the above suit as a party defendant. The said impleadment is sought on the ground that in the event the suit is decreed, the decree may be executed against the premises which are 2 allegedly in occupation of the applicant as according to the learned counsel for the applicant, there is an averment in paragraph 2 of the plaint that the defendants have agreed to handover the possession of the premises which are allegedly occupied by the applicant to the plaintiff. 2. The suit has been filed for recovering an amount of Rs.2,45,000/- allegedly lent to the defendants. In the suit, Notice of Motion had been filed by the plaintiff for attachment of the premises allegedly occupied by the applicant. However, the learned counsel for the plaintiff states that the said Notice of Motion has been withdrawn and therefore, as of today there are no proceedings pending seeking attachment. Considering the nature of the reliefs sought in the suit in my view, it is not necessary to implead the applicant as a party defendant to the suit. In any event if the decree is eventually passed in the above suit and is sought to be executed against the premises occupied by the applicant, the applicant has sufficient remedies under the law to object to the said execution. 3 Hence, no reliefs can be granted to the applicant in the Chamber Summons. The Chamber Summons is accordingly disposed of. (R.M.SAVANT, J.)