c^ <.^s7 ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCHHATriSGARH) W.P. (S) No^0(c@ /2010 PETITIONER ^' Durga Prasad Pujari, S/o. Shri Shiv Charan Pujari, aged about 40 years, R/o. Post - Nagri, Tahsil - Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^/ (1) State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^/ (2) Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division (Samanya), Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) -(3) Depot Officer, office of Depot Officer (forest), Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The Petitioner named above most respectfyll^sybi • i f ;K i XI-Hf-22 •swi sqpiRpT, 8ifl'yii<i. fwira^ an^r T^? tfltidl sh«tc(»u?;iP;<s?:7;06S7TC7"Wl. 200 Sd^lW fe-<i43Dt:a fi i^):^ritB ail^r ^aigR wf%?l S.B.:HON'BLEJUSTICEWlR,PRI 06-12-2010: <*l<llcl<ft'l '•flKCTi^'^^ tRltail •^siPtm^n^T^ ^ INKERDIWAKER Shri Vinod Deshmukh^couns^l Shri Pravin Das, Dy. G.A. fbr Grievance of the peititioner is regularizati&n'oh the posfofForest orithe postofwatehman. for fhepetitioner. Me State. that though he iSientitledfochis Guard, he has been regularized Counsel fbr the petitjoner su^mits that the respondents have completed all the fbrmalities for pasping necessafy orderin faivour of the petitioner and theref6re at lh)s stage the petitioner may ^ be permifted to wittidraw tlie presertt(}etition with libertytSfileafre'sh representaition before respondent directed to be decidecl in aecordarlce with lawas expeditiously as possible. Counsel for the Statesubmits cannbt make any statement whether regularize the services of the petitioner Hflwever, he has no objection if the tlfiat N0.2 and ttie same may Be without ascertaining the fact he :he State Goveinmenf is willing t6 on the post of Forest Guard or not. petitioner makes a representation ^"-^•^•- XI-HC-22 ^"^'3iraRra,'yTtlt)'i<i.f6«iwii<. 3Tii?r ira^ *<1*4CTI ai*1lch V5-P<? 200 l^sr' •CT^Iq^ [iwi»tiSnB?l ?ti*iien*Qft0 (fei-^ sn^i tCTWflfei before the authority concerned accordancewith law. anjd the same is decided by it in AGCordihgly, the petition is the event of any representatiotl respondent No.2 raising his decided by the authority concer(ied eXFieditibUsly as posSible. cfspbsed ofwith a direetioh tliat in fil®d by the pefitioner before >, the same is expeeted to be ih aecbrdance with law as grieva|lces It is made clear that this on merits ofthe case ahd th6 to decide the representation of th with law. qi|<)(<1<<ll11>«nl'?1%^ ^ISR^R ^siPwsn^r Coijirt has not expressed any opinion autht[)rity concerhed would be at liberty ^ petitibn'er strictly in accordanGe •Sd/— _ :q prituiker Diwakar \ Judge .T.^'s?Tt^'":