THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4658 of 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 C.P.C against the docket order dated 20.07.2011 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, in E.A.GL.No.13130 of 2011 in E.A.No.206 of 2007 in E.P.No.59 of 2006 in O.S.No.992 of 2005, whereby the application filed by the petitioner/objector to dispose of I.A.No.573 of 2008 in O.S.No.992 of 2005 at first before going into the merits and demerits of E.A.No.206 of 2007 in E.P.No.59 of 2006 in O.S.No.992 of 2005 and O.S.No.510 of 2007, was returned with the endorsement of the Presiding Officer that the prayer mentioned in the petition and in the representation amounts to deviation of the direction of this Court. Admittedly, the petitioner herein filed Tr.C.M.P.No.66 of 2010 to direct the Court below to try I.A.No.573 of 2008 in O.S.No.992 of 2005 filed by respondent No.2, and O.S.No.510 of 2007 and E.A.No.206 of 2007 in E.P.No.59 of 2006 in O.S.No.992 of 2005 filed by the petitioner, and dispose of the same jointly. This Court disposed of the said Tr.C.M.P with a direction that the issues involved in both the execution applications relating to the same property can be tried simultaneously and disposed of in accordance with law, on the same day. When this Court held that the execution application, suit and application filed to condone the delay in filing the petition to set aside the ex parte decree can be tried simultaneously and disposed of in accordance with law on the same day, the lower Court cannot go beyond the said direction and dispose of I.A.No.573 of 2008 in O.S.No.992 of 2005 at first as prayed for by the petitioner. In view of the same, the impugned order does not suffer from any illegality warranting interference by this Court. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J Date: 04.11.2011 va