IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3922 of 2011 Ramashish Choubey, son of late Radha Krishna Choubey, resident of village Indaur, P.S. Itharhi, District Buxar-----------------------------------------petitioner Versus 1.The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Petroleum and Natural Gases, Government of India, New Delhi, namely, Sri G.C.Chaturvedi 2.The Secretary, Department of Petroleum and Natural Gases, Government of India, namely, Sri G.C.Chaturvedi 3.Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited through its Senior Regional Manager, Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Bhawan, 6th Floor, Dak Bungalow Chowk, Patna, namely, Sri Pranay Kumar 4.The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Buxar, namely, Sri Ajay Yadav 5.The Block Development Officer, Buxar, District Buxar, namely, Sri Ajay Shaker Mishra---------------------------------------------------------opposite parties ----------- 3. 23.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties, officials of the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation. A show cause is filed on behalf of the opposite party No.3 in which it is stated that in terms of the observations of this Court in the order dated 1.9.2010 under contempt the enquiry has been made and the physical verification report dated 11.10.2010 has been submitted. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly accepts that as on consideration of the facts the writ application has been dismissed with certain observations no case for contempt is made out. However, he prays that he may be permitted to challenge the findings recorded by the opposite parties in appropriate proceedings. 2 The contempt application is, accordingly, dismissed. It goes without saying that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the opposite parties then he may challenge the same in appropriate proceedings. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) Spal/