.'/-is^;''?' ^^.M^ -^ '^Jt:^:::. Wi-ifBjetItiffh^NS. /2t)Gi8 pietltieners Res|yefliiuEl6 t;!S ;" i'"y^'f ^^i^^ i/iSii. k- /*' a.f: f ^>\. ,Aclim jati Sewa saNikari ;,samiti Mawaw^ ^ No.768, TehsilSu /:S;yRGUJft:(C.G;').:'.,:.,^ ::.:1": // :.: ..• ;1.!' ;,1-::.,.1: ^2. jria sahakari Ken&riya^Baok ^ '^ Ambil<a|3yr,'Distrlcf^RGUJA(G.G.)i .. •; :^^werSuS^':'.'.'';.,: '.' • •1 •' ,'• ,. '"\^: ' •}:;'.• ^4. r si'i^rafiSjngh, scin ^f snirl Racllia .Rartt singi'i, ^ retrred samiti PraBaindnak, ; throu'gl'i Jiia s^hakari; Kenclriya B3riK gMaf^dil.AIVlBII^PURf^GJ^^^'^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ ^laifflarrKysRWlia^SQn ofShiftSarnaru ! Ram,s reSiden^^f Mllage Bir^^ TehsilSUr^pu^ ''^.,?;ssnnar^:rRaii%^:ii^of,snM :; ? KuShwalT^ F^iiEientofVj|laf^B TO ; w 'Tetlsll:Sura^pur,^DIstrict;sURGUJft®^^ ^; RegiStr^r, p;Coo|:reFgitiv&^^^^^^^Y S^ . Chhatt!sgar^% .A*- 'wnT^ptnTiilffiii.tKlBBtlWIi.K^Bi^IISB^ '.^lr;^fiST)TyiiSNSiRtNlMA:W F>ARTICU|-AR^©RTHE;KKTl3'IS>NERS: A^men£iQnieajH®rernaBoveW® ^^^ petition. •/3ai£3Si'Ks^ ^^•^^SK—^ ^*. HIGH COURrOTCHHATTISGARH.BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLESHRI^RASHANTKUMARMISHRA. J. W.P.(227VNo. 2519 of 2008 PETmONERS Adim Jati SewaSahakariSamitt:" fttefyadSChadramerfta and anoffwr. Versus RESPONDENTS SharanSinghandottiers. WRITPETITION UNDERARTICLE2270RTHECONSnTUTIONOF moiA, Appearance: Stm AffMpamOubw(, oounsftlfw p^Sotwre. Sfin'IWanof ftaranjpe, Gounsef for respondent Nto.1. Miss Neha Venna, counsel for respondent No. 2. (•dwfefei t'esisiow'tei'At'to.'S, Shri G.D. Vaswani, Gov(. / ORAt.ORDER (07n2/2011,) Following oral order Prashant Kumar Mishra. J. of the Court was pa%ed ty The petitioners are agarieuediw ttiajM'dei' AnniW«»P/3passed by the Regjstrar. Co-operative Sociiette, Chhattisoath dism^ina Uieir appeal under Ssction 77(?) <1) of the Chhattisgarh Co-operatlve Societies Act, 1960 as barredby limitation. (?) Learned counsel for the petitioners would submitAaton peiusal of ttie impugned order it can be demonstrated that the appeat wssibanwi l(y 11 days and for condonaUon of the said delay an application dulv supported with an affidavit was submitted, howwer the appellat® authority has wrongly reiected the appllcation for condonaUon of d^ay andas a conseq.uence Iheappeal ilself has been dismissed. Leamed counsel would further submit ttiat the appellate Court should have taken a svmpathetic and lusUce Qrientedapproach whHe dealina w'rth a ya^w for condonation of delayand the delay should have been condoned moreso \when there is no finding that the delay was mateiScfe or was made \negligently toobstruct ttie matter to be ad'iudicated by the auftorih'es. ^ —z.- (3) Learned counsel for tfte respondente have vehemently argued that the petitioneis have not been able to explain eadi da^ delay in movina the appeal and thus the impugned order does not call ior any interference. W From Ihe mpugneA(>nferitvrouldap(»artetKW<sf^^on^ dated 13/07Q004 was received Jw^ aepeUant on13UjDl^ifi4^Jh fact, the appeal preferred by tbe appellant was undCT SecfiQn %f6r whichthe period of limitafion is 30 days and the period spent in ohtainfattcet'Ufied? copy of ttie order is to be excluded from compulina U»@ pmod cf limitation. In the matter of Coffec&w;I.and Acqu/sWontJlflfflBtoae^and another Vs. Mst Kaffff and <^iers reported in 4/ff fa87SCt3fi3ff»e Hon'bleSupreme Court has held Uiat when the delay in preferring Uie appeat is nrt mafeficfe and the delay is hot enormous^ Court sbould be liberal in condoning the delay and (u'ving opportunity to the parB^ to contest the case on merits. f^) In view of the above^ the instant pefition is allowed. tt is .dtoected that the appellate Court shall now hear the appeal on merits aml deckte the same in accordance with law. Leamed counsel a()(»aringfor respondent No.1 has submKted ttiat the ^ppeal itsetf was n<A maintainable. 7he respondent No.1 may raise this plea of non- malntainabi'lify of the ^ppeal before fte ^ppellate Court and ffsuch objecBon is raised the ^ppellate Court shall firet deckte ttiis point before proceeding to deckle the qppeal on merits. f7) The writpetiUon stands allcwed with above dfrecfion. tB^Vs '^. 'IL ^. pras,bant^wua Judse