FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Review Application No.82 of 2009 In FAST No. 4496/2008. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _______________________|_______________________________________ 1. Heard counsel. 2. The appeal was dismissed on account of non-compliance of the condition enumerated in Section 30(1)(e) of the Workmen's Compensation Act. So also it was dismissed because there was delay of 58 days. Mr.Jayabhar, learned advocate submits that the applicant is ready to deposit 50% of the amount and could be given opportunity to present his case. The compliance of condition is stipulated to entertain the appeal and it is a pre- condition. No patent error on face of the record is revealed. Hence, the application is dismissed. No costs. (V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) Dt.17.12.2009. asp/office/ra82.09