IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11906 of 2008 SARITA VISHWAKARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 4.5.2009 It is submitted that a supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner on 4.9.2008. The same is not available on the record and therefore the Court requested the counsel for the petitioner to make available his copy for perusal by the Court in view of the limited submission being made on behalf of the petitioner from the same. Annexure-9 to the supplementary affidavit is a representation of the petitioner stated to have been filed before the District Magistrate on 22.8.2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that appropriate orders may be passed for a direction to consider the representation with regard to the arrears of salary. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the disposal of the writ application in terms of the limited prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. Without any observation on the issue of the appropriate authority, at the request of the petitioner, the writ application is disposed with the observation that the representation stated to be pending before the District Magistrate be decided and disposed off within a maximum period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Let the Registry of the Court place on record the supplementary affidavit stated to have been filed on 4.9.2008. The writ application stands disposed off. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)