£><. -HC—78 /^t^ T^T ^i'Hici^, y>ti1y^<o, fci^i^y ^ '^ ^wwi ^^^••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••-•••—•--•"^p^ 200 ^n^?r Tf^K (yif^^) ^TT^T^Tf^rhF ^r^T 3?T^T 9b^i°h ^TTWHft^T 3:TT^T HIGH COCRT OF WRIT PBTITION (Cl N0. 3121/2008 WRIT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLfe 226 & 227 OF THB CON8TITUTION OF PBTITIONER Vijay about 5( District ! INDIA B4hadur RESPOilDBNTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. State ofj Paachay^ Distdct B The Direfc (CG) 'l'he Bilaspur|< Chhattist fhe Sector-/t j Chhatrai Khuiaaaj Panchay^it Bilapspi^r ORA2t Dhirendra Mlslura. J. Dr. Rajesh Paadey, coiiusjel Mr. Sushil Dubey, Govt. 4dv. Heard on adniission. By fhis petition under Ai|dcles ludia, fhe petitioner has impu^ned ^l^[<n^1l T^HT^Tf ^f fe^ {psi^K '^3tfW3T^T ATBILASPUR Sin^i, S/o Jaganjifh, aged yeara, R/o Pendra, Tahsil Maiwahi, lilaspur (CG) VCTSUS Chhattisgarh, through the Secrctaiy it, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, aipur (CG) tor Paachayat, D,K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Secr^tary Ad<4itional Collector. Pendraroad, Uistdct (CG) ^arh Castc Scnitiay Coinixiittcc through lecr^tary, Pandit Diadayal Upadhyay Nagar, Raipur (CG) >al Siagh, aged about 40 years, S/o Singh, R/o ViUage- Majgawan, Gram hay^it- Mahora, Tahsil Marwalii, District >spi|r (CG) ORDER -06-2008 for the petitioner. /. forfhe State, 226 & 227 offhe Constitution of the order of Annexure P-1, dated •—78 's^ ^iqi<n^ ^til^^co, f®i<ni^^< *<i*i^r <h*<s<ft •^200 3:IT^?T "q^T ( ^t^^T) ^TT^T ^T f^-iict) TT^TT ^il^^l $h^l^ I^TTW^rf?^ ^H^T -^' Ro4id Dircct(|)r, CoUectbr nlot 12.6.2008 passed by fhe Dirccto^ Additional CoUector, Pendra been rcversed in exercise of ap^ fhe CIihattisgarh Panchayat R^ 1993') Learaed counsel for fhe order was passed by fhe fiadmgs of flie Additional held fhat respondent No.5 was in fact, he was belonging to the by fhe respondeut No.5 ia th^ prescribed authorily-fhe establish fhat he belongs to fhe appeal of respondeut No.5 before fhe Director, Panchayat isj Act of 1993 makes specifiic pro^ Dinector, Paachayat aad in Section 91 offhe Act of 1993 weifc I have heard learaed Froni perusal of fhe im^ Director, Paxichayat, takiag in^ issued by fhe Sub-Divisioiiall yespoudent No.5, has been show| tribe category and that the High Power Caste Scnifmy Com^L ehl^^l-1 'RT^Fff ^f 'fe^ 'tf^?K '5fr3tRw^?r r, Paachayat, whereby fhe order of fhe dated 16th/ 17A August, 2007, has eUate jurisdiction under Section 91 of j Adhiaiyam, 1993 (for short 'Act of respo^ident Schfcduled ^etitioner submits that fhe iaipugned ct<|>r, Paachayat without considermg the ;ctt>r, who ia his weU reasoned order, has fhe nieinber of Scheduled Tribe, but g|eneral categoiy. No docuxiient was faed form of caste certificate beforc fhe No.3/ Additional CoUector to Tribe categoiy. Eveu ofherwise, junder Section 91 of the Act of 1993 not xxiaintaiaable, as Section 36 ofthe j^isions to prefer an appeal before fhe circuiastances, the provisions of ?er^ not applicable. petitioner, ^ugned order, it is evident that tiie to consideration fhe caste certtficate OjBScer, Pendraroad ia. which ttie h as Taiiwar", which falls in scheduled has been further upheld by the •in^nittee, cosistituted by the Govemm^nt^ thbse coiinsjel for ffae certificate ^^"°KS^. /^^ "\, ;f ^_^^ t ^.-.v^ "^^sse^vG—is "S^ ^{WW^, ^)1li-(H<|(o, f®Kni<-|^< Nl*f<PlT tb*11<sh ^ 200 ^TI^T TR^' (llcl^<s!<^) 3T(^T ^T Rl'lJcb ^T27T 3TI^?T s^Hich J ^<TTW?rft?r 37T^T J7 AdditionalICoIlector IDlpU; of Chhattisgarh, has allowed ffa^ rcmoval passed by fhe After gomg through the ini^ that fhe above order has been is also a coxnpetent authority aad reasons assigned ia the abov that there is no iHegality, infirmi ^e appeal and set aside the oider of the Court below warraiitmg mte^ underArdcles 226 & 227 offhe In the rcsiilt the petition b| dismissed and is accordingly ConsequenUy, IA, No.l als| mtetference cftiqt^^ll 'RTR^ff ^* 1^2t <F3l^,i< ^^RR3T^T ini^ugned oider aad considerfcag fhe fact p^ssed by the Director, Panchayat, who rn^der Section 36 (4) of fhe Act of 1993, order, I ani ofthe considered opiidon ify or jurisdictional error comaiutted by in exercise of the jurisdiction Oonstitution oflndia. ?ing devoid of substaace is liable to be dis4iissed at the admission stage itselt alsb staads disniissed, Sd7- Dhirendra Mishra Judge