IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7106 of 2008 Date of decision: 23.03.2009. Davinder Kumar ...Petiitioner Versus Surjeet Kaur and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Mandeep Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. G.S.Sidhu, Advocate for the respondent ***** S.D.ANAND, J. Both the Courts ( learned Trial Court and also the learned Ist Appellate Court ) recorded a finding of affirmative character which is relatable to the material obtained on the file. Even otherwise, the revisional Court would, obviously, not be inclined/authorised to interfere (with the judicial discretion exercised by the learned Trial Court and the learned Ist Appellate Court) unless if it is found that the learned Trial Court and also the learned Ist Appellate Court had exercised discretion in an injudicious or perverse manner. It is not so in the present case. The judicial discretion by the learned Trial Court and also learned Ist Appellate Court deserves affirmation and it is so ordered accordingly. However, the petition is disposed of with a direction that the learned Trial Court shall dispose of trial itself within six months from the next date of hearing. The acknowledgment (of a copy of this order) issued by the concerned Judicial Officer shall be forwarded to the Registry of this Court. Learned Sessions Judge shall himself maintain a tab to ensure that the case is disposed of by afore-mentioned date. March 23, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge