IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 8TH DECEMBER 2011 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32684 of 2011(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MOIDEEN PP, PARKKATTPUTHENPURA, METHALA PO, PERUMBAVOOR (VIA) PIN BY ADV. SRI.N.K.KARNIS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, ERNAKULAM DT COCHIN 682030. 2. DEPUTY COLLECTOR, L.R, ERNAKULAM, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD PIN 682030. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ASAMANNOOR VILLAGE, ODAKKALI PO ERNAKULAM DT 683549. SR.GOVT.PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.32684/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED DT 20.8.07 OF THE SUB REGISTRY OFFICE, KURUPPAMPADY. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED DT 24.3.94 OF THE SUB REGISTRY OFFICE, KURUPPAMPADY. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED DT 1.2.1980 OF THE PERUMBAVOOR SUB REGISTRY OFFICE EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE CERITIFIED COPY OF THE SALE DEED DT 22.3.1950 ISSUED BY THE KOTHAMANGALAM SUB REGISTRY OFFICE. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DT 18.3.2009. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT 10.1.11. EXT.P7: TRUE COPYOF THE REPORT NO.C3.15773/97 (B1) DT 16.5.11 OF THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 32684 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 8th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner and his wife have purchased 10.26 ares of property comprised in R.S.360/2 of Asamannoor Village. Ext.P1 is their title deed and the prior title deeds are Exts.P2, P3 and P4. According to the petitioner, till 2008-09, tax in respect of the property was accepted and that thereafter it was refused to be accepted on the ground that the land in question is involved in a ceiling case of one Kallarakkal Koraa Tharakan. It is seen that complaining of the above, petitioner has moved Ext.P6 representation to the 1st respondent. Thereupon the 1st respondent obtained Ext.P7 report from the Tahsildar. Thereafter the proceedings have not been finalised as a result of which the petitioner is unable to pay the tax. It is in these circumstances, the writ petition is filed. 2. Thus, as at present, the issue concerning non payment of the tax in respect of the property of the petitioner is pending consideration of the 1st respondent, to whom Ext.P6 representation was made. WPC No.32684/11 :2 : 3. Therefore, I direct the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 in the light of Ext.P7 and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp