- 1 - 2.ss.2239.10 skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.2239 OF 2010 Dattatray Maruti Kale ..Plaintiff -Versus- Dilip B. Devlekar ..Defendant .......... Mr.Ramesh Jain i/b Ramesh Jain and Kusum Jain for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant. .......... CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 20TH OCTOBER 2011. P.C. 1 The suit is based on a dishonoured cheque drawn by defendant payable to the plaintiff. 2 The defendant failed to pay the amount despite the plaintiff’s advocates’ notice demanding payment. There was no reply to the plaintiff’s advocates’ notice dated 29th April 2010 demanding payment. 2 The defendant has not filed an appearance. A compilation of documents is tendered by the plaintiff in Court, is taken on record and marked “A” collectively. - 2 - 2.ss.2239.10 3 There is nothing on record that militates against the plaintiff’s claim. This a fit case to accept the averments and submissions in the plaint as correct. 4 The suit is, therefore, decreed as prayed. However, interest after the date of the suit shall be at 12% per annum. Costs to be quantified as per Rules. Refund of court fee, if any, as per Rules. -