1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No.117 of 2010 (GDurgesh Gopal Giri (Convict) v. The State of Maharashtra and another) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Coram : A.P. Lavande and R.C. Chavan, JJ. Dated : 15th March, 2010 Heard Shri Jaiswal, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Shri Mirza, learned APP for the respondents. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 10-2-2010 passed by respondent No.1 rejecting furlough to the petitioner. Perusal of the impugned order discloses that furlough has been rejected on the ground that the surety offered by the petitioner is not ready to stand as surety for the petitioner and the surety is not in a position to have control over the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had offered another surety, however the same was not accepted. There is no such statement made in the petition. As such, the submission is without any merit. The reason given by respondent No.1 for rejecting furlough cannot be faulted. We do not find any fault or illegality in the impugned order. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Needless to mention that the dismissal of this petition would not come in the way of the petitioner from seeking furlough by filing fresh 2 application giving fresh surety. Judge. Judge. pdl