IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 32367 of 2009 Date of decision: 09, 2009 Salma Begum and another ........ petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. P S Jammu, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. P M Anand, Additional A G, Haryana for the respondent-State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel has filed reply on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3. The same is taken on record. As per the aforesaid reply, both the petitioners are major and have solemnised their marriage as per the Muslim rites and ceremonies against the wishes of the parents of petitioner No. 1. In view of the above, the Superintendent of Police, Panchukla is directed to provide necessary security to the petitioners, if need be. Disposed of accordingly. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge December 09, 2009 mohan