IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER FRIDAY, THE 18TH JULY 2008 / 27TH ASHADHA 1930 WA.No. 1502 of 2008 --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.33373/2007 Dated 14/07/2008 .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------ SHIBU PAUL, AGED 34 S/O. PAUL, KADUTHOTTIL HOUSE, KADANAD KARA, KADANAD VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN SRI.K.M.ANEESH RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: -------------------------------------------- 1. BHARANANGANAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE PRESIDENT BHARANANGANAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT 3. C.M. DEVASSIA CHIRACKAL, PIRAVITHANAM P.O. 4. JOSE, KAYYALAKKAKAM, PIRAVITHANAM P.O. 5. GOPALAKRISHANAN, CHIRACKAL, PIRAVITHANAM P.O. WA No. 1502 OF2008 6. TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. R1 BY ADV. SRI.SHAJI THOMAS PORKKATTIL R3 BY ADV.SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP. R6 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.M.P. SREEKRISHNAN. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L. DATTU, C.J. & A.K. BASHEER, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A. No. 1502 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 18th day of July, 2008 Judgment H.L. Dattu, C. J: In this writ appeal we need not have to refer to the facts in extenso, since the learned single Judge has done that exercise. In fact, the learned Judge in paragraph 9 of the order has once again directed the Sub Committee of the Panchayat to inspect the premises of the petitioner and if the Committee is satisfied that the situation in the piggery has been improved, it will be open to the petitioner to make an appropriate application for renewal of his licence, and if such an application is made, the Committee would consider it in accordance with law. 2. In our view, the learned Judge has granted enough and more relief to the petitioner. In our view, the orders passed by the learned Judge is most harmless and that order should not have been made the subject matter of this writ appeal. 3. Therefore while confirming the findings and conclusions reached by the learned Judge, we reject the writ appeal. Ordered accordingly. H.L. DATTU Chief Justice A.K. BASHEER Judge an/dk.