HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.16827 OF 2009 Dt.24.8.2009 Muchakurthi Shankaramma … Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector, Karimnagar and two others …Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.16827 OF 2009 O R D E R: The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition had taken notice on 17.8.2009 and requested time to get instructions. Thus, the matter is coming up for admission. Heard Sri Venkateshwar Varanasi and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition had placed written instructions before this Court, wherein it was stated that it is to submit that in response to petition of the writ petitioner, a memo has been issued vide Memo No.B1/299/04 dated 20.8.2009 and a copy had been enclosed stating that the award enquiry is under process and the case of the petitioner would be considered during the award enquiry and hence, the question of referring the matter under Section 30 of the L.A.Act to the Civil Court, for adjudication of dispute does not arise. The writ petition is filed, for a writ of Mandamus declaring the in action on the part of the 2nd respondent in not considering the petitioner’s objection petition dated 8.7.2009, in respect of H.No.2-59 situated at Peddampet village of Kamanpur Mandal, Karimnagar District as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to conduct the enquiry and consider the claim of the petitioner and refer the matter under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act to Civil Court for adjudication of dispute and pass such other suitable orders. Several facts had been narrated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. The relationship between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent also had been referred to. In the light of the instructions placed before this Court, this Court is of the considered opinion that the writ petition be disposed of with an observation to the effect that let the 2nd respondent look into the grievance of the petitioner and take appropriate decision in this regard in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. _________________ P.S.NARAYANA,J 24th August, 2009. PNV