(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 4939 OF 2009 Shaikh Amjad s/o. Abdul Rajjak. .. Petitioner (Original defendant no.1 ) versus 1. Munja s/o. Jija Pathade, 2. Kishan s/o. Jija Pathade, 3. Saheb s/o. Jija Pathade, .. Respondents 4. Sakhubai w/o. Sahebrao Kharwade, (Nos.1 to 6 - 5. Sulabai w/o. Pandurang Shelke, Original plaintiffs, 6. Kantabai w/o. Annasaheb Bodakhe, No.7 - Original 7. Pralhad s/o. Bansi Jogdand. defendant no.2 ) .......................... Mr. S.S. Choudhari, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amol Gandhi, Advocate, for respondent nos.1 to 6. Respondent no.7 served (Absent). .......................... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 23RD NOVEMBER 2009. (2) COURT'S ORDER : 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 6th March 2009, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Manwat, below Exhibit 5 in Regular Civil Suit No. 51/2008, thereby allowing the application filed by the respondents plaintiffs for grant of temporary injunction. The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 2nd July 2009, passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Parbhani, in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No. 15/2009, thereby dismissing the appeal filed by the present petitioner. 2. No perversity is noticed in the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the learned Judge of the trial court, thereby granting injunction in favour of the respondents plaintiffs, and the learned Judge of the appellate court, thereby dismissing appeal filed by the present petitioner. In that view of the matter, no interference is warranted in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. Hence, the petition is dismissed. ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp4939