IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6604 of 2009 NAGESHWAR RAI, SON OF LATE PRAKASH RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHAKMEHASI, P.O. PURUSHOTTAMPUR, P.S. MANIYARI, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD,PATNA. 2. THE ADMINISTRATOR, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PENSION-CUM-PROVIDENT FUND TRUST COMMITTEE, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 3. THE GENERAL MANAGER-CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER, TIRHUT AREA, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, BHAGWANPUR, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. 4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (ACCOUNTS), TIRHUT ELECTRIC SUPPLY AREA, MUZAFFARPUR. 5. THE ELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY, MUZAFFARPUR WEST, MUZAFFARPUR. 6. THE ELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, MUZAFFARPUR. ----------- 2. 22.5.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-Board. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite sanction for payment of gratuity as per the sanction letter communicated to him as per Memo no.4569 dated 15.9.2006 (Annexure 1), he has not received the ultimate payment till date. Besides, it is submitted that although G.P.F. amount has been sanctioned vide Memo no.3936 dated 18.8.2006, as contained in Annexure 2, but the ultimate payment was made on 15.5.2007, vide Annexure 3, and as such the petitioner is entitled for interest on such delayed payment. In addition, there is some dues against overtime. For redressal of the 2 above grievances, the petitioner although represented to the authorities, but the same has not been considered till date. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner proposes to file a representation before the Administrator, Bihar State Electricity Board, Pension-Cum-Provident Fund Trust Committee, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna (respondent no.2). In case such a representation giving specific claims is filed within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order, the respondent no.2 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation could be redressed without further delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)