IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1708 of 2006 RITA DEVI W/O LAXMAN SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – GABHIRAR P.O. AND P.S. RAGHUNATHPUR DIST. SIWAN ------ DEFENDANT/PETITIONER. Versus 1. SHEOJANAM SINGH 2. SHEO BACHAN SINGH BOTH SONS OF DATA RAI 3. RAJEEV RANJAN SINGH SON OF RAM JANAM SINGH ALL 1 TO 3 ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE GABHIRAR, P.S. RAGHUNATHPUR, DISTT. – SIWAN. --------PLAINTIFFS/OPPOSITE PARTIES. 4. SHYAM NARAYAN RAI @ SHYAM NARAIN SINGH S/O LATE SHEO PRASAD RAI 5. SRIMATI PUTUL DEVI W/O RAM JEE SINGH NOS. 4 TO 5 ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE – GABHIRAR, P.S. RAGHUNATHPUR, DISTT. SIWAN. -------- DEFENDANT/OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Advocate. For the opposite parties : Mr. Krishna Kishore Sinha, Advocate. ---------- 3. 5/3/2009 Heard Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Krishna Kishore Sinha, learned counsel for the opposite parties. The defendant-petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 5.9.2006 passed by the Sub Judge-III, Siwan, in Title Suit No. 281 of 2002 whereby the petition for amendment of plaint filed by the plaintiff-opposite party Nos. 1 to 3 has been allowed by the Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that these amendments ought not have been allowed at this belated stage as the plaintiffs now tend to change the boundary of the property in dispute itself. Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that - 2 - there are typographical errors only which are to be amended and the same stands described in paragraph-4 of the amendment petition which has been brought on record as Annexure-1 to this petition. The trial court having considered the rival submissions has allowed the prayer of amendment in the interest of justice. I do not find any jurisdictional error in the order under challenge. As a result, this Civil Revision is dismissed. S. Ali (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)