IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39321 of 2011 Sunil Giri Versus The State Of Bihar -------- 03/ 15.12.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. The victim girl has stated in her statement recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C that she was forcibly taken away by the petitioner and other accused persons and after that petitioner solemnized his marriage with her on the point of pistol and also established physical relationship with her but contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that victim was in love with the petitioner and she solemnized her marriage by her own sweet will and, as a matter of fact, she was major at the time of above stated marriage. It is also pointed out by him that when the victim was recovered from the house of the petitioner, she made her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C under the influence of her parents but later on, parties compromised the case and now, the victim is residing with the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Sunil Giri, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patnacity in Fatuwah P.S. Case no. 89/2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)