IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC NO.15640 OF 2006 JAYANTI MISHRA,W/O MR. NAGESH MISHRA, R/O MATRI SADAN, SHIBAJEE PATH, CHHOTIKHAJERPUR, P.S BHAGALPUR KOTWALI, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR. …………………PETITIONER. VERSUS 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY CUM COMMISSIONER, (HIGHER EDUCATION), HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, PATNA SECRETARIAT PATNA. 2.T.M BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR, THROUGH REGISTRAR, T.M BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY. 3.VICE CHANCELLOR, T.M. BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. ………………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 05/ 06.09.2011 Having heard counsel for the parties and taking into account the supplementary affidavit filed today by the counsel for the petitioner now limiting the grievance of the petitioner to the following four issues:- “i. Difference of arrear of salary from 1996 to 30.11.2001 (scale of Rs. 14,940) amounting to Rs. 1,04,228, similarly D.A. thereon has also not been paid. ii. Roaster duty of 66 days for getting the payment of roaster duty the petitioner has written an application to Finance Officer. However aforesaid payment has not been made to the petitioner. iii. Without information University has been deducting Rs. 1000/- from the pension. To know the reason the deponent (petitioner) has written an application to the Vice Chancellor of the University. . iv. Arrear of salary from 1984 to 1995 amounting to Rs. 2 1,69,916.89 paisa for payment of the aforesaid amount the deponent (petitioner) has written an application to the Vice Chancellor, however the same has not been paid. this Court would give liberty to the petitioner to represent her case before the Vice-Chancellor of the University. The Vice-chancellor of the University upon receipt of such representation will pass an appropriate order keeping in view the entitlement of the petitioner. It is made clear that the arrears of difference of pay either for the period from 1984 to 1995 or for the period from 1996 to 2001 will be liquidated only if the same has been paid to the other teachers of the University. The Vice-chancellor of the University would accordingly pass his reasoned order and communicate the same to the petitioner within a period of three months. If any further amount is found payable to the petitioner the same would also be paid to her within a period of one month from the date of the order of the Vice chancellor. In the event, the Vice chancellor would find that the petitioner 3 is not entitled to any or all such amount under the aforementioned four heads he would record reasons for the same and communicate his order to the petitioner by registered post. In view of the fact that the matter has been finally disposed of, there would be now no need to record anything regarding the absence of Director Higher Education who could not appear before this Court in absence of communication to him by the learned counsel for the State. The personal appearance of the Registrar of the University is dispensed with. With the aforesaid observation and direction this application is disposed of. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)