IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 23RD JANUARY 2009 / 3RD MAGHA 1930 RP.No. 41 of 2009() ------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN COC.1396/2008 Dated 16/10/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN C.O.C.(PETITIONER IN THE WPC) ----------------------------------------------------------------- USHADEVI.P, W/O.D.BAHULEYAN,AGED 56 YRS, RETIRED ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR,S.C.DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, RESIDING AT 'BUDS' MAYYANAD.P.O, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.UNNIKRISHNAN (KOLLAM) RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS IN C.O.C.(RESPONDENTS IN THE W.P.) ------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SRI.PAUL ANTONY AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT.OF KERALA,S.C. & S.T.DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,TRIVANDRUM. 2. SRI.SUKUMARAN,AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,DIRECTOR,S.C.& S.T. DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM. BY GP SMT.LAKSHMI RANI THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- R.P.41/2009 in C.O.C.1396/2008 in W.P.(C).9707/2007 -------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of January, 2009 ORDER I do not find any grounds to review the judgment in the Contempt of Court case wherein, I have recorded the submission of the learned Government Pleader that the retirement benefits due to the petitioner will be disbursed on the petitioner executing a bond. It is made clear that there shall be no delay whatsoever in the disbursal of the amounts due to the petitioner immediately on she executing a bond. It is further made clear that execution of the bond need not be treated as an expression of any liability on the part of the petitioner but is intended only as a measure of expediting the disbursal of retirement benefits due to the petitioner and for safeguarding the interest of the State. Subject to the above, Review Petition is disposed of. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs