IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16066 of 2010 MD.SHAHID KHAN, S/o Imteyaz Khan. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 17.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 467, 468, 406 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the informant entered into an agreement with co-accused, Sonu Agrawal and Ravindra Gupta for installation of mobile tower. However, when the same was not installed the informant made inquiries and he was told that the Managing Director of the company would answer the queries. At that very moment two persons alighted from a car and started questioning the informant. They were arrested by the police who arrived there on suspicion that they were the real managers of the firm and were responsible for the tower installation. However, there is no cogent material in support of the same. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named who is in custody since 01.02.2010 and has 2 no criminal antecedent be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in connection with Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 20 of 2010 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be local since the petitioner belongs to Kaimur. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on 3 date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)