1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1092 OF 2011 The State of Maharashtra .Applicant V/s. Sachin Hanumant Gadekar & anr. .Respondents Mrs.V.R.Bhosale, APP, for the Applicant  State None for the Respondents CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 15TH NOVEMBER, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is an application for leave to file an appeal against acquittal of the respondents ordered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 504, 506 read with Section 3(i)(x) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Two children, who were taking meal along 2 with several others in a marriage complained to their grandmother that the respondents had refused to serve them food because they were Mangs (Scheduled Caste). The accused explained that they had not stated anything like that and what had stated was "Ye, mage aamati aana that is they had told another person who serving food to serve aamati (some sort of curry) to people in the backside and that this was misunderstood by the complainant's grandchildren as a reference to their caste. It cannot be said that view taken by the learned Judge is perverse or improbable to call for interference. Leave refused. Appeal dismissed. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)