IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.196 of 2008 PRAGYA SUMAN ,WIFE OF SUDHANU SHEKHAR PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA MAHADEO MATH, P.S. ROSERA, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR----- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE BIHAR STATE PUBLI C SERVICE COMMISSION THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN 3. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,PATNA 4. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-CUM- EXAMINATION CONTROLLER, BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,PATNA -------------- RESPONDENTS . ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Anish Kumar, AC to SC-18 For the B.P.S. C. : Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate ----------- 2 16-11-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and learned counsel for the B.P.S.C. Learned counsel for the Bihar Public Service Commission rightly objects to the prayer in the writ application that there is no provision for re- evaluation of answer-sheets, but only for re-totaling. A supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the Commission explaining Annexure-B to the counter affidavit that reference to Advertisement No.43 of 2005 was an inadvertent typographical error with regard to Advertisement No.34 of 2005. From Annexure-B , it is apparent that the Commission has acted in accordance with permissible laws for re-totaling of the answer-sheets only and communicated the result to the petitioner. The application stands dismissed. NKS/- ( Navin Sinha, J)