IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 2967 of 2008 Between: Madala Venkata Gopal Rao, S/o. Krishna Rao, R/o. Agiripalli Village and Mandal, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Society Nuzvid,Krishana Dist 2 The Agiripalli Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Ltd Agiripalli(V)&(M) Krishna Dist Rep.by its Secretary 3 Sri Paturi Ravi S/o.Venkateswara Rao, Agiripalli P.A.C. Credit Society Ltd Agiripalli(V)&(M) Krishna Dist Rep.by its Seretary 4 Sri K.Mangaiah S/o.Not Known to the Petitioner, Agiripalli Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Ltd Agripalli(V)&(M) Krishna Dist .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 1st Respondent in not taking steps under Section 21-A and 21-AA (2) of A.P. Co-operative Societies Act, to disqualify the Respondents 3&4 as Members of the Society as well as the Members of the Committee of the 2nd Respondent and consequently directly the 1st Respondent to take action on the Representation dated. 28.03.2007 submitted by the previous president of the Society and also to take action as mentioned in the Legal Notice dated. 30.01.2008 to disqualify Respondents 3 & 4 as Members of the Society as well as the Members of the Committee. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.SRINIVAS POLAVARAPU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 2967 of 2008 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed seeking Mandamus declaring the inaction of 1st respondent in taking steps under Section 21-A and 21-AA (2) of A.P. Cooperative Societies Act to disqualify the respondents 3 and 4 as Members of the Society as well as the Members of the Committee of 2nd respondent as arbitrary and illegal and, consequently, to direct 1st respondent to take action on the representation dated 28.3.2007 submitted by the previous President of the Society and also to take action as mentioned in the legal notice dated 30.1.2008 to disqualify respondents 3 and 4 as Members of the Society as well as the Members of the Committee. There is no necessity of going into all the details. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that during the pendency of this writ petition the respondents 3 and 4 were already removed from the membership of the Committee; therefore, nothing survives in this writ petition for further adjudication. In the circumstances, the writ petition is liable to be closed. It is accordingly closed. However, this will not preclude the petitioner, if the information furnished to the Court is not correct, from seeking to reopen the writ petition and work out the remedies. C.V. RAMULU, J. Date: 26-02-2009. MVB.