6/,0’ 2m Lx IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (c -) No. \QVb 0f 2011 BETWEEN .Satvinder Singh S/o Hardayal Singh, aged about 5'” years, by caste Punjabi,R/o Normal School Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG). .Smt. Ranjit Kaur W/o Satvinder Pal Singh, aged 5b about years, by caste Punjabi, R/o Normal School Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District BilaSpur (CG). 6* .Gurmit Singh S/o Hardayal Singh, aged about 110 years, by caste Punjabi,R/o Normal School Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG). PETITIONERS AND .The State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG). . The Land Acquisition Officer cum Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Bilha Bilaspur (CG). . The Tahsildar, Bilha, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (CG). RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA @‘— H§GH COURT OF CHHA T§SGARH : BILA$F3UR WRIT PETlTiON (C) NO. 1213 DF 29?} (Writ Pemion under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Singie Sench : Han’b$e 3m Satish K, Agnihairi, J. Presem :- Shn Shaiiendra Soni. Advocate forihe metiiioner. Shré V.V.S‘Murthy, Dy‘ Advocate Genera} for the State. Shri Somnaih Verma‘ Advocate far fhe inferverfer. \$ g& ESHO}! GRDER {Passed on fhis 2m day cf Nevember, 201 1) f. By this petmon, the pemionem seeks a direcfion f0 fhe respondents to handover the possession of the land in question after dispossessing the enoroachers, which had eariier been allotted to the petitioners. Shri Murthy, learned Dy. Advocate General submits that the State has already taken steps to remove the encroachment, only the order to handover the possesston remains to be passed and the same shall be passed as early as possible: preferably within a period of three weeks. hri Verma, teamed counsel appearing for the lnlervener submits that out of the land in dispute involved here‘m. a portion of the land has already been awarded to Shri Kushiya, the husband ofthe lntervener ' Smt. Lain Bait Be hat as it may, the question of aitotmeni to any other person cannot be decided Tov this Court, as it invoives disputed question of facts. However, it is made clear that before passing the order for handover the possession in terms of revenue book oiroutar, tuii opportunity would be attorded to the lniervener and the petitioners to put toward their cases before the authorities. lt the dispute still survives with regard to altotment otthe land and handing over otthe possession, the narties mav take recourse to the competent Civit Court for appropriate reliet. Aocordingiy, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sdl- SATISH K. ANGNIHORI Judge » PETiTlONERS $at‘v‘ia‘1der Singh & Othem Versus RESPONDENTS The Staie of Chhattisgarh & Others