HIGH GOURT OF GHHATTKGAmi. BIU Pl« W.P.tSl No4452 of 2007 PETmONER RESPONDENTS AnilKumar Tlwari S/o. Shri ©upteshwar Prasad Thwari, E^ed about - % ysars, R/o. - Village Marhi, Tahsil Maugaij, Distt. Revra. (M.P.) Versus 1. Chairman, Coal India LU. 10, Netafi Subhash Road, Kolkata (W.B.) 2. Director (P. & IR.), Coal India LW., 10, Netaji Subhash Road.Kolkata OM.B.) 3. Member Secretary, JBGG-VI (Joirrt Bipartite Committ^ for The Coal Industry), Coal India Ud. 10, Ne^ji Subhash Road, Kolkata (W.B.) 4. Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, S.E.C.L. Head Qtr. Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Chief General Manager, Bha^aon Area, Distt.- Surguja (C.G.) WRTT PEmiON UNDER ARTICU6 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION W INDIA Appearance: Shri Rahul Mishra, counsel for th®peUtioner. Shri Praveen Das, counsel for ttie r^pondents. ORAL OREffiR (02.08.2007T SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard. Learned counsel appeartng for the petitioner submits that tlie peCUoner is similarty situated to that of the respondents in the matter of Chairman, Central Coaffiefcte Ltd. & olhers Vs. Jivendfa Pmsad Tiwari & olhers (Cwil Appeat No. 1714 of 2007). Leamed counsel ftirther submlts that the sald Clvil Appeal has been disppsed of vide order datecl29ul March, 2007, passed b^ths Hon'ble SupremeGourt of India. Learned counsel further submits that this case may ateo be disposed of in the same terms, which the leamed counsel appearing for the respondente/S.E.C.L. does notcontrovert. In view of the above, the peUtion stancte disposed of In the same Jl terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatb' v