IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20470 of 2010 1. RANJAN KUMAR SHARMA @ BILAIA , SON OF LATE RAM KUMAR SHARMA 2. NAWALESH KUMAR, SON OF MAHESH SHARMA 3. PINTU KUMAR, SON OF VIJAY SHARMA 4. KAUSHALENDRA SHARMA, SON OF RAM NARESH SHARMA. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 342, 365, 386 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the Informant had purchased a vehicle from one Mr. Dipak Kumar who had in turn purchased the same on loan from Mahindra and Mahindra Finance Company. The petitioner happens to be the employees of the agent of Mahindra and Mahindra Finance Company and the allegation against them is that they forcibly seized the vehicle of the Informant on account of default in payment of loan. In view of such, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 287 of 2010 subject to the following : (1) That one the bailors will be a 2 close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to the cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J. )