w,J.— r/\ CD 0 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH QN‘i Q3 Arun Kumar Raj, - S/o- Late Shri Budhram Oti, Aged about 34 Years, R/o- Jognipali, P.O. Saraipali, Distt. Mahasamund, Chhattisgaarh. PETITIONER VERSUS 1. State of Chattisgarh, Through-Secretary, Deptt. Of General Administration, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Secretary, Deptt ofEducatlon ~>\ a‘D K S Bhawan Mantralaya § r9 Raipur CG ’ Deputy Director,- Education, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR-ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE. WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI ETC. “e Distt. Mahasamund, CG. Union of India, Throgh-Director, $a3;k¢m<m’ we Departmemt of Per§onnel, Training and ,X%i%to‘u§ I, Pubhc Grievances $6351“ “Dha i Lok Nayak Bhawan Khan Market t”Via;PM New Delhl RESPONDENTS 57 121 -1 2-2005 Petitioner by Shri Pt: Maj Mwlv ndqemxa , Advocate. Shri Sandeep Dubey, Govt, Advocate, forthe State. Heardr i Learned counsel for the State does ot dispute the above fact and state that the State f Chhattisgarh has taken a deCision tr? conSIder the cases of dependants of those employees who died on or after 1/1 1/1 997 strictly in accordance With the policy prevalent at hat time. l ln view of the submissions made ‘ t ustice will be served if a direction is giveri ,oncerneq to consider and decide the cas )revaient at the time of death of the empk appointment i orders will be issued as early any i grievance still remains, the petitioner With the aforesaid observations, this petition stands disposed of Certified copy as per rules Copy to the State counsel who w respondents for compliance Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge < This case relates to compassionate empioyee serving in the State Learned counsel for the petitioner c the employee has occurred on or after 1 ‘i‘ n batch of cases bearing W P No ”22/2 2 involving the same question orders have been oassed by this Court on 20/1 2/2005 He p ys that Similar orders may be passed in this case also vithout expressing any opinion on the merit appointment consequent upon the death of an ategorically stated that in this case, the death of -1 997 and not earlier. lt is further submitted that by learned counsel appearing for the parties: s ofthe case, in the opinion ofthis Court, ends of to the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities a of the petitioner in accordance with the policy iyee concerned. if the petitioner found eligible, as possible on or before 30‘" April, 2006. The >étitioner is also directed to render due co-dperation to the authorities lt is made clearthat if may avail the remedy available under the law 'icluding tiling of the petition before this Court, ill be obliged to communicate the order to the / waffles? WWm {P3 e Nxr l9‘1‘4 m. ’0 270 Vnéw w W § m f‘m‘1W %‘$ WW mlma‘r‘m‘g‘é ». \X mram?!