IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1710 of 1999 RAJ BAHADUR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 9/ 12/8/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner came to this Court in February, 1999 with a claim to be considered for appointment on the post of Constable under an advertisement No.2/1995 alleging that in an earlier advertisement of 1993 also he had applied and was successful, but never came to be appointed. Likewise, under the latter advertisement also he succeeded, but never came to be appointed. This Court on 18.9.2003 had noticed the objection of the respondents of the petitioner seeking an appointment under a 1993 advertisement as against a 1995 vacancy. Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents. It states that the petitioner was not successful either under the 1993 advertisement or under the 1995 advertisement. Additionally, though the petitioner had made allegations of discrimination vis-à-vis respondents 6 to 10 inasmuh as he claimed that - 2 - they have been appointed under the latter advertisement when they had not applied thereunder, loses its significance in view of the fact that the petitioner himself, for reasons of non-compliance with the peremptory orders of this Court for issuance of notice to them on 27.11.2004, has allowed the writ application to be dismissed against the private respondents on 8.9.2005. The writ application is dismissed. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )