IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16764 of 2010 1. POONAM KUMARI D/O SHRI SHANKAR MAHTO R/O VILL.- MAULVICHAK, P.O.- CHAKNAWADA, P.S.- DALSINGSARAI, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE MEMBER DISTRICT TEACHERS APPOINTMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY, SAMASTIPUR 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-COLLECTOR, SAMASTIPUR 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SAMASTIPUR 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, SAMASTIPUR 6. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER (B.E.E.O.), DALSINGSARAI, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER-CUM- APPELLATE AUTHORITY PANCHAYAT TEACHERS EMPLOYMENT 2006, DALSINGSARAI BLOCK, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR 8. THE MUKHIYA-CUM-CHAIRMAN PANCHAYAT TEACHES SELECTION COMMITTEE, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ NAWADA, DALSINGSARAI BLOCK, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR 9. THE PANCHAYAT SEWAK-CUM-SECRETARY PANCHAYAT TECHERS SELECTION COMMITTEE, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ NAWADA, DALSINGSARAI BLOCK, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR 10. PINKI KUMARI W/O SHREE RAJESH KUMAR CHOUDHARY R/O VILL.- DHEPURA, P.S.- DALSINGSARAI, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR ----------- 2 10/05/2011 Even if the finding of the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority recorded in annexure- 17 which is impugned in this writ application with regard to the time barred claim of the petitioner is ignored, the - 2 - fact stands that the issue relates to appointment of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra in the year 2005. When the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra does not exist after 1.7.2006 in terms of 2006 Rules, the dispute with regard to the claim of the petitioner for such appointment remains academic. To that extent the dispute does not require any interference. This writ application is dismissed. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)