s iirsgi®B® BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH GOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P (S) No.">y)G of 2011 PETITIONER Umesh Ram Sahu, aged about 51 years, S/o Late Shri Domar Singh Sahu, Headmaster, Government Primary School, Rudgaon, Block- Dongargaon, District-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^^?yLt ^y ri^-^S€v):J' .-•/'^'''/^'"' ^''\^''' .••••" ^y^^' ^.^•••" :1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : the Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^" 3. Block Education Officer, Block- Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226_OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^5 ^SET '^liqiintf, SSfllyiS, f^TRTy ...wl.Q.y^..:...^.^^, a:n^?iTra?T(' 31R?f^Tl7n^ (WTan^TWqNT L. -+ TOnwHftasn^i SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra^floiian Shlriyastava, j. 30-QS-2Q11 ft>r f0r ooDnsei Shri Gautam Khetrapal, counsel Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panei Lawyerfjsi Witn the consent of learned finaily. The petitioner was appointed on 4 completing the probation period of 2 yea| Learned counsel appearing forj invoived in the case is as to whether, th^ with effect from the date of initiai appc) period. The issue involved herein was ct Administrative Tribunai, Jabafpur in 0.4. orners v. State ofM.P. & otfiers), wh^ teachers are entitied to regular pay s| appointment. The matter was taken up| Leave Peiition (Civi!) No. 6892/93. The Supreme Court, uphoiding the decisioti Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entiti^d inrtial appomtment. Accordingiy, the petitioner is raising ail his grievances, in the tight oj concerned respondent is direoted to conj perspective. if the petitioner stands on the State Administrative Tribunai in Mat -+l'!4ifpN TSP^ ^ fs^ VSKZK ^ 3ifif«T3!lt5T the petitioner. the Siate. ;ei for ihe parties, the matter is heard fixed pay of Rs. 1 OO/'-. After suocessfuliy •s, he was granted regular pay soale. the petitioner submits that the issue petitioner is entitied to reguiar pay scale intment or after compietion of probation ^insidered by the Madhya Pradesh State LNo.2745/89 Wadhiiicant Yadu ana 56 irein, it was held that the simiiariy situated sale v/itn effect from the date of initiai to the Hon'bie Supreme Court in speciai aid petition was dismissed bythe hlon'ble of the Tribunai to the effect that the lo reguiar pay scale Trom the date QT gr^nted aaid liberty to maKe a representation the aforesaid judgment and in tum, the sider his oase on its own merits and in its the same rooting as per order passed by jhukant Yadu (Supra) and subsequently kl; XI-HC—78 'S^ -^WW^, »fl1<H'l<»,fs|<yii<Lll^< ^-.....LO.£.©.:i^..:...3.A.??A/ sn^r T^T ('i^t^ST) siiW^ifeN? ^WT 31I^[ ^lfR; wnwHfegao^i c? °M<-ii<n*ftn HW<^\ ^ fs1^ '^^K ^; SffipT 3I^?T Dyyyti Spleciai confirmed by the Supreme Court in Sp|e order dated 3/1/95, the petitioner may tje it is expeoted from the State scrutiny ofthefacts. it is made clear t'nat this Court t|ia the case and the authority concerijis representation strictty in accordance wilh With the aforesaid obseni'ations,! Leave Petitton (Civii) No.6892/y3 by je entitled to same reiief accordingly. ajjthorities to pass suitable order after due t|ias not expressed any opinion on merits of- ijied would be at iiberty to decide the iaw. |the petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge