IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-31332 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 17.11.2011 Rajiv Bhatia …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …Respondents ………. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Rajiv Kataria, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raghubir Chaudhary, Sr. DAG, Punjab. *** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Mr. Raghubir Chaudhary, learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, on instructions from ASI Jaswant Singh, Investigating Officer, states that petitioner is cooperating with the investigation and police has taken into the custody relevant documents and police is examining those documents as well as the ammunition and guns, taken into custody by the police. Mr. Chaudhary has further stated that as on day police is not intending to arrest the petitioner. Mr. Chaudhary has further stated that if police intends to arrest the petitioner in the present case, 48 hours’ advance notice shall be served on the petitioner. On the statement of Mr. Raghubir Chaudhary, learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, on instructions from ASI Jaswant Singh, Investigating Officer, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition at this stage. Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage. ( Alok Singh ) November 17, 2011 Judge Anand