IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1072 of 2008 JITENDRA SAH & ORS Versus RAM PRASAD SAH & ORS ----------- 2 29.07.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioners. In view of the fact that by the proposed amendment in the plaint neither the nature of the suit would change nor the petitioner, defendant would be prejudiced in any manner, inasmuch as, a subsequent event which has taken place during the pendency of the suit, has been sought to be incorporated in the amendment made by the plaintiff. This Court finds no error in the impugned order allowing such amendment made in the plaint The merits of such amendment, including as to whether the plaintiff will be in a position to prove the same or not, cannot be a ground for refusing amendment as is being now contended by the counsel for the defendants, petitioners. There being no merit in this application, the same is dismissed. BCJ (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)