1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.97 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1797 OF 2008 I Ven Realty Limited & Anr. ...Petitioners vs. Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Hemant Shah i/b M/s.I.C.Legal for the petitioners Mr.Ram Apte Sr.Adv.with Ms T.K.Puranik for the Respondents CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 16, 2009 P.C. 1 The petitioners by filing this petition have alleged the breach of interim order dated 13 th August 2008 passed by a Division Bench of this Court. The said interim order was passed by the Division Bench in a writ petition filed by the petitioner. By the said interim order, interim relief in terms of prayer clauses (C-1) and (C-2) was granted by the Division Bench. The breach alleged is of interim relief in terms of prayer clause (C-2). By the said interim relief, the respondent Nos.3 and 4 were directed to grant its no objection and approval for development of the two plots being plots Nos.217 and 217-A of Worli, Scheme No.52. It is pointed out that no objection certificate in terms of the said order was belatedly granted on 6 th December 2008. 2 The learned counsel for the petitioners fairly pointed out that on 28 th April 2009 the Division Bench disposed of the writ petition finally. Rule was made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b) of the petition. 2 The Division Bench clarified that the no objection to be issued pursuant to the final order in the petition may be withdrawn by the respondent nos.1 to 5 to the writ petition if the law permits them to do so. 3 According to the case of the petitioners, the concerned respondents did not comply with the final order passed in the writ petition. Therefore, contempt petition no.70 of 2009 was filed by the petitioners in this court. The contempt petition has been disposed of by this court on 15 th July 2009. While disposing of the contempt petition, this court recorded the statement of the learned counsel for the Municipal Corporation of the Greater Mumbai that in terms of the final order passed in the writ petition, the respondent shall issue no objection certificate within four weeks from the said date. 4 What is alleged in the present contempt petition is the breach of the interim order passed during the pendency of the writ petition. Now, the writ petition has been finally decided by order dated 28 th April 2009. Considering the aforesaid subsequent events, this is not a case where action can be initiated against the respondents either under Contempt of Courts Act,1971 or under Article 215 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, petition is disposed of. Notice is discharged. JUDGE