1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE SIDE SIDE CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2070 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 2070 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 2070 OF 2005 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 9224 OF 2005 APPEAL (ST.) NO. 9224 OF 2005 APPEAL (ST.) NO. 9224 OF 2005 VIDYA VINAY VIVEK CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED .. APPLICANTS Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS... RESPONDENTS Mr. Y. S. Jahagirdar with Mr. Manek Kalyaniwala i/b M/s. MULLA & MULLA CBC for applicants. Mr. A. R. Patil, AGP for R-1 Mr. S.R. Page with S. G. Surana for R-2 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2072 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 9480 OF 2005 VINOD AMRUTLAL SHAH & ANR. .. APPLICANTS Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS... RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2073 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 9477 OF 2005 VIRENDRA B. SHAH & ANR. .. APPLICANTS Versus 2 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS... RESPONDENTS Mr. Y.S. Jahagirdar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Surel Shah i/b M/s. Manekshad Sethna for applicants Mr. A.R. Patil, AGP for R-1 Mr. S.R. Page with S.G. Surana for R-2. CORAM:-SMT. RANJANA DESAI,J. DATED:-5/7/2005 P.C. . In these three civil applications it is prayed that my order dated 15/4/05 be suitably clarified. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties at length. 3. In my opinion the only clarification which would be necessary is that the trial court should ensure that my order dated 15/4/05 should not be interpreted in such a manner as to frustrate the applicants’ right to get their title decided. 4. All these civil applications are disposed of. (SMT. RANJANA DESAI,J.)