IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.35096 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 21, 2011 Vijay Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Nakul Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. No grievance can be made against the order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate. Cancellation report in this case was submitted, which, though was not accepted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, but directed further investigation. While directing further investigation, the Chief Judicial Magistrate directed the investigating agency to give three days notice in case the accused were to be arrested. In my view, this approach of the Chief Judicial Magistrate is fair, especially so when the police has found the accused persons innocent. No objection can really be heard on behalf of the complainant that this will not lead to proper investigation. Such a grievance can only be raised by the investigating agency, which has not come forward. In my view, this is a fair order and is in accordance with law and as such would not call for any interference under Section 482 Cr.P.C. November 21, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE