IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.2685 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision:20.12.2010. Raj Kumar ...Appellant Versus Brij Nath (dead) through his LRs and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON’B LE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Vijay Lath, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) The plaintiffs, namely Brij Nath and Sudesh Vohra, filed a suit for possession against the defendant Raj Kumar, which was partly decreed by both the Courts below. During the pendency of this second appeal, the matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Center of this Court where both the parties decided to bury the hatchet. Consequently, the land in question is retained by the defendant Raj Kumar against a payment of `70,000/- to the plaintiffs. Both, plaintiff No.2 Sudesh Vohra and defendant Raj Kumar, are present in the Court with their respective counsel. Defendant Raj Kumar has handed over a post dated cheque bearing No.707804 dated 02.04.2011 of `70,000/- to the plaintiff No.2 Sudesh Vohra towards full and final settlement of the dispute. In view thereof, the present appeal is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid settlement/compromise between the parties. However, it is made clear that in case the cheque given by the appellant to respondent No.2 is dishonoured for want of “sufficient funds”, the present appeal shall be deemed to be dismissed. December 20, 2010. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE