IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 4736 of 2009 Date of Decision: March 25, 2009 Suresh Kumar ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. R.K.Handa, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. The petitioner has challenged the show cause notice on the ground that there were certain irregularities in the inquiry proceedings. After arguing for sometime learned counsel for the petitioner could not deny that the pleas he is now seeking to raise could well be taken in the reply to the show cause notice. The only apprehension of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the disciplinary authority may not consider these objections. I see no reason for this apprehension. It would be incumbent upon the disciplinary authority to consider all pleas which the petitioner may take in response to the show cause notice. Consequently this writ petition is dismissed as being premature. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE March 25, 2009 sunita