Civil Writ Petition No. 7612 of 2010 ***** Roshan Lal versus The Presiding Officer and another Present: Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. DAG, Haryana for the State. ***** The petitioner has filed this writ petition to impugn the award dated 14.02.2008 passed by the Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Hisar. Counsel for the petitioner submits that there may not be much requirement to go into the merits of the controversy raised as identical award passed in the case of one Ram Mehar and impugned by him filing Civil Writ Petition No. 4341 of 2010 has been remanded back while disposing the writ for the Tribunal to pass a fresh order. Copy of the order passed in CWP No. 4341 of 2010 was handed over to Mr. Nehra, who after going through the same states that the issues involved in the present writ petition are identical and the award passed in this case was also similar/identical with the award, which was under challenge in CWP No. 4341 of 2010. The only difference is that the workman in both the cases are different. The contention in the present case also is that no finding has been recorded by the labour Court with regard to the days, the petitioner has put in service with management in 12 preceding months from the date of his termination. This position was not disputed and accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of with the following directions:- Civil Writ Petition No. 7612 of 2010 -2- “ In view of the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, the Award passed by the Labour Court dated 14.2.2008 (Annexure P-1) cannot be sustained and is hereby set aside. The case is remanded to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hisar for fresh adjudication in accordance with law. The findings will regard to the days the workman had put in service in the 12 preceding months from the date of his termination be recorded.” Adopting the same course, the award, Annexure P-1, is set aside. The case is remanded back to the Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Hisar for afresh adjudication in accordance with law. The Labour Court would record the finding in regard to the days the workman had worked during the last 12 preceding months from the date of termination. The parties through their counsel are directed to appear before the labour Court on 30.08.2010. The present writ petition is accordingly disposed of. July 21, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE