IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16451 of 2009 RAJ KUMAR SINGH @ RAJ KUMAR son of Ram Pukar Singh resident of village- Khurmabad, P.S.- Chenari, District- Rohtas. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 06.05.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged is under section 341, 323, 147, 148, 504, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that although the petitioner had moved earlier for grant of anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. No. 43669 of 2008, which was allowed in respect of other petitioner, however the application of this petitioner was rejected vide Annexure- 1 of the application. Learned counsel further submits that after passing of the aforesaid order another accused namely, Ram Pukar Singh who is alleged to have given the assault by sharp cutting weapon which resulted in serious injury to the son of the informant. It is further contended that the said Ram Pukar Singh was allowed anticiapotyr bail by this Court as per the order dated 27th of Marchy, 2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3455 of 2009 whereas the allegation against this petitioner is of holding pistol in his hand and threatened the son of the informant. 2 Learned counsel for the State is not in position to refute the above submissions. Considering the facts and circumstances, it is directed that in the event of his/her arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Chenari P.S. Case No. 21 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under section subject to the condition as laid down under section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)