IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 23RD NOVEMBER 2009 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 26790 of 2009(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- NANDANAN, PULLANIKKATT HOUSE, KOZHIKKOTTIR, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD. SR. GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.K.S.MUHAMMED HASHIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.26790 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner filed Ext.P2 application before the respondent seeking revision of his own timings. The petitioner's grievance is that although the same was filed as early as on 20.7.2009, it has not yet been considered. The learned Government Pleader submits that the same can be considered within two months. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. I make it clear that I have not considered the eligibility of the petitioner for getting his timings revised. It is for the respondent to first consider the question as to whether he has made out a case for revision of his own timings. Only thereafter, timing conference, if necessary, shall be convened. The petitioner shall be afforded an opportunity of being heard before passing orders on Ext.P2. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2