IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2010 / 12TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 25687 of 2005(G) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- GOPINATHAN NELLIYERI, AGED 50 YEARS, LECTURER (SELECTION GRADE), SIR SYED COLLEGE, TALIPARAMBA, KARIMBAM P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT, S/O. P. BALAKRISHNA KURUP RESIDING AT NELLIYERI MADAM, PALLIKUNNU P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.RAVISANKAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. KANNUR UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, KANNUR UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, MANGATTUPARAMBA, KANNUR. 2. VICE CHANCELLOR, KANNUR UNIVERSITY, KANNUR UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, MANGATTUPARAMBA, KANNUR. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. K.JAJU BABU, SC, KANNUR UNIVERSITY SRI.M.SASEENDRAN,SC,KANNUR UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.25687/2005 APPENDIX P1:- COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DTD. 19.8.05 SIGNED BY THE PRINCIPAL SIR SYED COLLEGE, TALIPARAMBA. P2:- COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DT. 14.6.2005 OF THE IST RESPONDENT. P3:- COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF G.O.(P) NO.171/99/M/EDN. DTD. 21.12.1999. P4:- COPY OF THE MEMO DTD. 11.8.05 BY THE IST RESPONDENT. P5:- COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DTD. 19.8.05 ISSUED BY THE PRINCIPAL SIR SYED COLLEGE, TALIPARAMBA. P6:- COPY OF THE MARK LIST FOR M.A.EXAMINATION OF PETITIONER DTD. 13.4.1986. P6(a):- COPY OF THE MARK LIST FOR M.A.EXAMINATION DT. 24.11.1988. TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE tss T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 25687 of 2005-G - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2010. JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges the rejection of his candidature to the post of Registrar of the first respondent University. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition can be closed leaving open the contentions of the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly closed leaving open the contentions of the petitioner. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/