IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 14TH JANUARY 2010 / 24TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 1234 of 2010(D) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M/S.SRK CONSTRUCTIONS, MADATHIPARAMBIL COMPLEX, PALARIVATTOM, COCHIN 682 025, A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER (ADMINISTRATION), MR.GEORGE K.PAUL. BY ADV. SRI.TOM K.THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE THRISSUR CORPORATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, AYYANTHOLE ZONE, THRISSUR CORPORATION, THRISSUR, MR.K.B.MOHANDAS, SC FOR CORPORATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.1234 of 2010(D) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 14th day of January, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is challenging Ext.P2 stop memo issued by the respondent Corporation restraining it from continuing work in pursuance to Ext.P1 building permit. 2. As is evident from Ext.P2, the stop memo was issued consequent on the complaint received by the Corporation. Ext.P2 being only a stop memo, it is open to the petitioner to file its objections to Ext.P2 and seek its revocation. 3. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing that in the event the petitioner files its objection to Ext.P2, the same will be duly considered by the 1st respondent and final orders in the matter will be passed as expeditiously as possible. 4. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 1st respondent, who shall take appropriate action in the matter as directed above. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that though WP(C) No.1234/2010 -2- Ext.P2 makes reference to a complaint made by one Mr.Thomas, the petitioner has not been issued a copy thereof. Having regard to the above, in order to enable the petitioner to contest the matter effectively, it is directed that the 1st respondent shall make available a copy of the above complaint to the petitioner. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg