D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6228/2007 Press Club, Jalore Vs. 1. State of Rajasthan 2. Executive Officer, Municipal Board, Jodhpur. 3. Director, Local Self-Government, Jaipur 4. Laxmi Motion Pictures Pvt. Ltd. Date : 28.11.2007 PRESENT HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. RAJESH BALIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHANWAROO KHAN Mr. Girish Sankhala for the petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Joshi ) Mr. Hemant Datt for ) for the respondents. Mr. M.S. Singhvi ) Mr. M. Singhvi ) Mr. L.R. Upadhyay, Dy. Government Advocate. ______ Press Club, Jalore, the petitioner has filed this petition captioned as public interest litigation seeking a direction against the respondent No.4 that he be stopped from constructing commercial complex and similar directions may be issued to the State Government to hold an enquiry into it. The petitioner has also asked for holding an enquiry through Anti Corruption Bureau. However, the facts disclosed in the petition are that the plot in question was validity allotted by the Municipal Council to the respondent No.4 initially for construction of Cinema and the grievance of the petitioner appears to be that instead of constructing a cinema, a commercial complex is being constructed thereon which is contrary to the purpose for which the land has been allotted to the respondent No.4. In our opinion, the petitioner is a total busy body and cannot be permitted to litigate for the purpose of enforcement of contract between the Municipal Council and allottee. We also find that according to the adjudication made by the Additional Collector on 17.8.2006 the land in question already stand converted to be used for any commercial purpose on paymen;t of conversion charges. Thus, the basic ground of challenge does not survive. Moreover the petitioner has not disclosed about its status. Whether is a legal society or an association of persons or has any legal entity to take up such causes. The Annex.1 produced along with writ petition merely shows the names of office bearers of the club and a mobile number whose mobile number it is also not known. It does not show whether it has been required under any law to don the cloak of a juristic person. All in all it appears to be a group of self appointed guardian of such causes to poke their nose in other affairs as busy body. The petition, therefore, fails and is hereby dismissed. The petitioner, must pay a cost which we quantify at Rs.10,000/- to be recovered jointly and severely from the person whose names appear as petitioner No.1 and 2. The cost shall be payable to respondent No.4. [ BHANWAROO KHAN ], J. [ RAJESH BALIA ], ACTG.C.J. babulal/