d§ SINGLE Wm IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. PL (S) No. @Nw maes 0%03 PETITIONER r x": ' Ajegt Kumar Lakra ‘ ‘ S/o Shri s.M.- Lakré Aged abouy 42 yew? Upper Division Tea(:;her, Middle School Fatehpur, Ambikapjur, Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS i RESPONDENTS /1. State of Chhattisgafh JThrough : Secretary, Schedule .y 1 Caste/Schedule Tribes Development / 5 i g‘ Departfnent, Mantrayalay, D.K.S. \(KA \n" f... Bhawein, Raipur, (C.G.) x5 . ,/2. Collector (Tribal Development) Surguja, Ambikpur (C.G.) 3 Commlssmner Schedule Caste/ Schedule Tribes Development Deptt., Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA \ W VL§)N‘°37<f<f m1 20,07 WW £Wa‘m) mwWm W‘W§WW " I $§mm ‘v‘ l- 23.3?.2&%: 3hri Bhupendra Singh coun‘se} for the petitioner h Shri Yashwant Singh T kur Dy. AG with éhri Shashank Thakur PL forthe {esponde ts/ tate. Challenge in i‘his peiiiion ig :0 tiae ordar dated 30.6.2Gi39 i passed by respondent Not by hich the petitioner who is working a3 Upper Divisian Teacher, icidie Schooi, Fatehpur, District k Sarguja has been transferred tot e office of Block Education Officer, Batauii‘ Disirict Sarguj'a‘ Cenieniion 9f the couns i for the petitiena‘ is tha? in the present place of posting the peti lener had joined on 7.8.2008 and Within a period of 10 months he Fae again been shifted by ‘che crder impagned. He wither submits the? nobecly has been posted in place ef ihe petiiioner which shows thati‘ihere is no administrative exigency in passing the impugned cider cf transfer. Counsei for the respondents/8tete submits that iet the petitiener make a suitable reptesentatien to the authorities cemented which weuld be decided in accordance with iaw. To this proposition 0f the State counsel,tcounsel for the petitioner showeei his agreement. However, he prays fer an interim protection till the representation of the petitioner is decideci by the authorities concerned. _ i * -?1x«f—F1C~7s Wm. m m 200 mm aaaaa'qu) “‘1'? . Accordingly, the petmen :s c the petitianef makes a represent: a witiiin a period 0f 1O days fmm t cider, the ’authorities concerned ‘ further periad 0f three weeks from order impugned shaii be kept in abeyanoe $0 far as it reiates to the peeri'oner WW§WW’ ‘r < ‘mmam irsposed or wzth a direction that Er” men to the autherities oencemed he date of receipt of copy of rhie shall decide the same Within a the date of its receipt. Till thee the w i Sdl- Pritinker Biwaker r 'Judgce ‘ '