IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M-13733 of 2009 Date of decision : 03.08.2009 Gurmail Singh ....Petitioner V/s State of Punjab ....Respondent BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. A.K. Khunger, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG Punjab. Mr. Sandeep Jasuja, Advocate for Mr. Mangat Singh, Advocate for the complainant. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the entire FIR only allegation against the petitioner is that the complainant overheard the conversion of the petitioner with certain other persons that daughter of the complainant had been enticed away by Mehnga Singh for marrying her and that she would not return now. According to the counsel, FIR does not disclose any hand of the petitioner in the commission of crime. Learned counsel for the State (on instructions from ASI Raj Kumar, who is present in Court) submits that pursuant to order dated 29.05.2009, the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for custodial interrogation. In view of the above, the instant petition is allowed. The petitioner is granted the concession of anticipatory bail subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. 03.08.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE