IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11789 of 2009 1. UPENDRA SINGH @ MUTTARU 2. Monita Devi Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 18.04.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the prayer of the petitioner no.1, inasmuch as he has been arrested. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner no.1 is dismissed as withdrawn. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that it was Naresh Singh, who was behind pregnancy of the complainant. So, the matter was concerned with the complainant and Naresh Singh. In that also allegation is about an attempt to administer some medicine to terminate the pregnancy, which also not succeeded. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner no.2 is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 935 of 2001, above named petitioner no. 2 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Kishanganj subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)