/f^:\ '^Bi|| ^/ ^^s^ r ^^ XI-HC—78 ^-^v. "S^ •^l^i^^, ^^l-M^Ko, [sfdl'M^ HINCTI ^^j^,-'——•••-"•"—•••••••———•••"•^ 200 3TI^?T TR^' ('<^t33f^) 3^^1'^Tf^N? WT 3:H^?$FIW ^A IR^W ^f?H ^s^l ^i^<fli ^l^df ^ <fe%t {f^^K ^stfw^T^r IAPPUCAJIT ICOMPLAINANT M.C.C.N01250F2Q09 Heeramaaai jShulda S/o Shri Raghunath Prasad Shukla, ag^d about 59 years, Branch Manager, Bilaspur, jRaipur Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Braach Bil^spur (CG), R/o Matachaura, Seepat Road, Bila^pur, Tahsil and Distdct Bilaspur (CG) Verdus RE^PQKDIBWT Shri R.C. O CONTBMNOR Baok, Samt4 Coloxiy, Raipur (CG) Applieatlon for modlfieatlon of inCoatempt 8.B Hon»MeStei DhireachF^Iffi tili, Chairmaa, Chhattisgarh Gramia order dated 13.1.2009. pasaed n Mo.160/2007. 22.1.2009 Mr. Gautam Kheteapal, lean^ed counsel for fhe appMcant The applicaiit has filed tfals it>etition for modificatioxi of ffae order dated 13.1.2009 passed in Cont^mpt Petition No. 160/2007, as fhe above contempt proceedings were <|lropped on the basis of statement of learaed counsel appearing for fhe i|espondent that m compliaace ofthe order dated 17th November, 20p6 passed in WP No.3942/1989 (Annexure A/1) current seniority |ist has been prepared aad filed as Annexure R/2 and in fhe said se^iorily Ust, the petitioner has been placed beforc Shri V.Y. Joglekar, The above order was passedj m the absenee of fhe pelitioner as none appeared on his behalfwhenjfhe matterwas caUed. /^S'^'h. r€~"% "% ^Sgh B t,. '%^./ ^ '3~^ T^l<41<n-4, ^Ttl^Ks, 'fstdt'H^ ^i^r^Tl?;iw iNT^H^T^sN? f 1. ^ ^ ' NI*Tdlt?lhNlt)b-;""""""""""""""""""""""""""^;^20Q'. ^TI^T 1ep^F (^(^^4) I^TW^ft??^i1^F j^ The mstacfct application f<^r modification has beeH filed on fhe gyound fhat m fhe contempt p R/2 filed on behalf of fhe res^ondent/contemnor, was a coiicocted document aad order dated 17th jNovember, 2006 of fhis Coiut has not been complied with. Heard. Learned counsel for fhe typographical or clerical error record, warraiifhig modification Annexure R/2 m Contempt petitioner, but fhe saaie cannot The petition is, accordiag^ dismissed. ^FRfe^^'W^ °^'fe%^ ^•^K ^3t^y^?l^!T ^titioii, the gradation Ust of Annexure pefitioner could not poiat out aoy fpr aay error apparent on fhe face of In tfae order dated 13.1.2009. The grouDd taken by ^pLe petitioner that fhe document of petition No. 160/07, is a concocted docuiaent and the rcspondeiit/|contemnor has, m fact, not complfed wifh fhe order of fhis Court, na|ay glve a firesh cause of action to the fbe a ground for modifyiag tihie oider, Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judgc ^^€^^^ ^W^ <^Rf^(f^—FS/95—11 /2G08—1,00,000. U.^^l^.^.^.i.oS.-!