IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 14TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 40164 of 2003(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.MARY KAMALAVATHY, RTD.HEAD MISTRESS, G ATPS, MUNNAR, NOW RESIDING AT DOOR NO. MGP XII/646, H.R.C.ROAD, MUNNAR. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, IDUKKI AT THODUPUZHA. 4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MUNNAR. 5. THE HEAD MASTER, GOVERNMENT ATP SCHOOL, MUNNAR. 6. DISTRICT PROJECT CO-ORDINATOR, D.P.E.P. IDUKKI. SMT.T.B.REMANI, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.40164/2003 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 : COPY OF CHARGE MEMO DATED 10/10/2001 ISSUED AGAINST THE PETITIONER BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P2 : COPY OF REPLY DATED 22/10/2001 FROM THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P3 : COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 18/02/2003 IN OP NO.5517/2003. P4 : COPY OF LETTER DATED 01/07/2003 FROM THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. P5 : COPY OF CERTIFICATE DATED 01/07/2003 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT. P6 : COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 16/07/2003 FROM THE PETITIONER TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT. P7 : COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 17/07/2003 FROM THE PETITIONER TO THE 6TH RESPONDENT. P8 : COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 17/07/2003 FROM THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE. jg ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.40164 of 2003 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 5th day of November, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner, who was Headmistress of a Government School, has retired from service on 31/03/2002. In this writ petition, the limited relief that is sought for is for consideration of Ext.P8 objection filed by the petitioner against Ext.P5 liability certificate. According to the petitioner, Ext.P8 objection is pending consideration of the 3rd respondent without any decision. If, as stated by the petitioner, she has filed Ext.P8 objecting Ext.P5 liability certificate, necessarily, it is a matter for the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders. This, the 3rd respondent shall do with notice to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 3rd respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg