^.Lo< c ^' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writpetitionno. ^^ /2004 Petitioner ^ Respondents ^l.^""'" ^•'' ^^' ^l"}<^..>'^?^'0 Ltl'0K^ ^»^8.B"»°UI LIYAQAT ALI ANSARI Aged about 56 years, S/o late shri Abdul Hamid Ansari Occupation - Service, Asstt. Grade-II Public worjks Departm^pt, Raipyr, R/o Near Women polytechnic College, Byron Bazar, Distt.-Raipur(C:G.) Versus (1) The state of cfahattisgarh, Through,Secretary Public works Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) (2) Engmeer-in - Chief Public works Department Distt. Raipur(C.G.) (3) Executive Engineer (B&R) Division-1 Public works Department Distt. Raipur(C.G.) (4) Executive Engineer (E&M) Divis^ft Public works Department Distt. Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CQNmTUTION OFINDIA XI-HC-22 W^T^T f^T[^'3TI^T ^Hf^d?cT Mst 3^' ^<l^lcl<4, y>Tft'Mj;<o, fc|dl^y< 311^1 M5(ch —^.e.'^.z^i^ ^l^dl $h^(cff""^—----"^ 200 |_xo 3Tl^T?;RTT^r^f?cf 12.4.2005 On a mention beiiig ma^ Shri Ayaz Naved, couns^ Shri G. K. Beriwal, Dep\ The petitioner, who is Division of Piiblic Works legaUty & propriety of order he has been traiisferred from | Raipur and further E&M Di^ Kwardha, The challenge of fhe seivices £rom B&R DivisionJ seiiiority of fhe petitiouer wi4 petitioner is fhat even E&M I? work aiid he has been direct Siib-Division, Kwardha. Reply has already bee3}i which it has been niention^d petitioner is concenied, even Division, Raipur to E&M Di^ affected, So far as flie concemed, since no post i^ tiierefore, fhe petitioner has was available at Sub-Division), Counsel for fhe petitioijic Raipur ai'e tying vacaiit ^ w^rkiiig Delpartment, dfeted <^i^f<-i41^ ^i^dT^te^^^K ^)3Tf^TT3T^T le, the matter is taken up for hearing. kl for tlie petitioner. ^ty Advocate General for the State, as Assistant Grade-II io. the CivU L, Raipur, has (yiestioued fhe, 31.7.2004 (Annexure P-1) whercby |B&R Division, Raipur to E&M Division, feion has postecl him at Sub-Division Ipetitioner is fhat by traiisferriiig his Raipur to E&M Division, Raipm' the be aifected. Second contention of the ^ivision, Raipur has not allowed him to ?d by E&M Division, Raipur to joio. at filed on behalf of the respondents in tliat so far as tlie. seniority of tlie trfter the traasfer of petitioner from B&R ^ision, Raipur his seniority will not be ^cond grievaiice of fhe petitioner is available at B&R Divisibn, Raipur , Ibeen posted at the vacant place which Kwardha. ^r submits tliat posts ui B&R Division, ven flien he has been traasferred, ^^ifeA^—-- ^^aE^SFis^.iigBasE XI-HC-22 3^T ^I^Krt^, ^xn<H41<o, [^^IW^< ^Fq?^! t-n^^ 1 $b^ ich v" " '' '---•--- ^- 200 u W^T^T f^TW3TI^T $b^icb^rf?cf 3n^T^<TT^K^rf5cf <=hi<4?d41-i tn^y^te^<^<-<ii< ^3:rf^T3:n^T.- Moreover, only 2 1/2 years sei} career the petitioner ought ultiinately, leanied counsel grievances th.e petitioner raayj respondent No,2 aad he be tlie pctitioner, to which leam| objection. Havuig heard leamed fhe facts and circumstaiices raised ia tliis petition and| petitioner, the petitioner is period ,of ten days froni grievauces aiid ia tursi poiats raised by fhe petitionj objective manner withia oftlie representation ia Wifh tlie direction Consequently, aU fhe p^ Certi&ed copy as per |vice is left, tlierefore, at the fag ead of not to have been traiisferred aad |submitted that for raisiag aU. these Jbe aUowed to make a representation to 4irectecl to decide the representation of ijed counsel for tixe respondents has no |;ounsel for the parties, having rcgarcl to j)f th.e case aad poiats which have beeii argned by leamed coiinsel for the to make a reprcsentatiou withdii a c^ay to respondent No,2 raising all his No,2 is directed to consider flie ?r aiid decide the reprcsentation iii asi one Biontli from tlie date of receipt with law, ^said, fhe petition staiids disposed of. ^iidmg I,As ai'e also stand disposed of. aUowed to^ay resp4ndent ao.otltier accoiilaace afordsaid, rulles. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (41^^R9^l) ^