r / IN THE HIQH COURT O? JUDICftTUHE AT BILASTOR (C.G.) W. P.NO. J.732-®P2002 BSTWBEN e;. ,< Anand KUnar AgEawal S/o LateShri Vinayak Krasad Agrawal, aged about 57 years, Besident of Purani Basti Bajalyapar^^aiEuir (C©). iSTITIQNER ^^w •^'l.l-""/^''" ' i!\/ -«•• .-'-?%1^-' •"..-••'-^•"a>:y' <--^v ^"^^'v .^''^-° .3:' •l« Ihe Depot Manager* ^'ktt~^'" '^ Madhya Eradesh State Roa<3 Transport Corporation, Kajnandgaon , Distric-t Rajnandgacm (CG). 2. ahe Divlsienal tanager, M.P.State Road Transport Corporation Divisl.onal oefiee, Kaipur. District Ralpur. 3. The ^Bnaging Directar, M.P.State R&ad fransport corporatlon. abib GaaJ. fihopal (MP). 4tf The Commission®r, Karamchari Aavisya Nidhi Offiee, Raipur. Dlstrict Raipur (CG). 5. ghe B'i.nancial Actvisor & eiiief Accounts Offieer, M.P. State Road 'rranspor't corporation, ^^. Head QEfiee Bhopal (MP). m lA-^! RESKWBBia'S ^-.-«'" WRIT SSTITIQN UNDER ARTICLES 226 /227 OS'_THE CONSTITUTION OF IN@tA ...^^K^;;-^i :'^ ;.;"•:;." XI-HC-2Z- ^Ni^fral?i3i,''^fNTO, Rwwy ;W.P.No^l732^2002 3:IR?['3;T fSFTRi'aii^l sriiwgfta sn^si ^<iiwaft?i q7Plf?ffr? 'WRtt' ^ fS^t '(f3R?TC '^airaqsfT^i 28.10.2002 Shri Bharat Rajput, pounsel for the Petitioner. In view o£ the limit|sd nature of the contro- versy, no useful purpose wiljl be served ±n keeping this wrlt petition pending and aci disposed o£ at the admission ^ordingly the same is .being stage. Madhya Pradesh State Road Tr Since the respondentls in this. petition are insport Corporation and its func.tionaries, Shri Dhir^ndra Mishra, who usually appe.ars for them, is asked tj3 take notice. 1 . — . 1 Heard• 1 ~ I A departmental enquij-y has been initlated against j the petitioner who 1s an Accbuntant working in the Madhya Pradesh State Road Transportl Corporation. Having been found guilty of charges levep.led against htm, the respon- dents termlnated his servicete vide Annexure P-1o Accord- ( ] ing to the petitioner, he ha^, against his termination, i ^ . preferred an appeal before tjie Managing Director vide but no action has been taken thereon. Annexure P/10/ However, on going through t'ne said Annexure, i it is found that it was addressed to the Financial Advisor and Chief Accounts Officer ahd copy thereof was endorsed aniongst others, to the Managp.ng Director, Raj Parivalian 9 V &f ^ ^i^^^w^?;'^^ ri^i^i r!,11»h! Bfl^I gitiN?^tf^r Anjani/. .3ll^<iiw<»<»( ~*~4 Thus, this eannot be takenl Considering that appealableo this writ petl) direction that if the petij before the Managing ths same shall be wifhin a period of three t|he order of termination is |tion is disposed of with a Directbr entertaltied With the direction '+l-Mtcl'il-l iniRTfTf •fezf ^fSRZTC ^SifigtT.siT^f • as^an appeal jfcloner :. prefers an appeal by 15th November, 2002, and disposed of on merits, mtsnths in accordance with law. made above, the writ petition stands disposed o£. Conse^uently, M-s(W) .P .No.1245/2^002 and I .A «?\To.5676/2002 also ptand disposed of • Certified copy as i>er rules Sd/- p C.Nafc Judge < <« :^RPRJ—FS/311—1/2001—50,000. ^