1 ABA 961 OF 2011 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.961 OF 2011 Mohd. Zubair Siddik Memon .. Applicant. -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. S. V. Marwadi, for the applicant. Mrs. P. P. Bhosale, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 24th November, 2011 P.C. 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by a local leader of a ruling political party, who is alleged to have threatened first informant's brother Zubair Usman that no report should be given to the police and that the police would not take any action and that if the complainant's party was found in the police station, they would be allegedly killed. Learned APP states that this has happened at the gate No.5 of Police Station. If some threatening took place at gate No.5 of the police station, and police should be oblivious is curious. All the same considering the nature of allegations made applicant's custodial interrogation may not at all be necessary. In view of this, in the event of applicant's arrest in connection with C. R. No.410 of 2011 registered by Malwani police station, Mumbai, he be released on bail on his 2 ABA 961 OF 2011 furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs.10,000/- on the following conditions :- i) The applicant shall make himself available on 28th November, 2011 at 11.00 a.m. for interrogation by the Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when required by the Investigating Officer. ii) The applicant shall also furnish his mobile telephone number and address and other details to the investigating officer. iii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iv) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. v) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of Maharashtra and ors, reported in A.I.R.2011 3 ABA 961 OF 2011 (SC) 312. vi) Application stands disposed of. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)