WP(C) 5568/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner by the present petition has prayed for a direction to the respond ent authorities to pay the compensation of Rs.25,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five La khs) for the alleged harassment mated out to her by the respondents and also to pay her the salary with effect from 11th October, 2010, i.e. the date when she i s stated to have joined the service under the respondents. According to the petitioner, because of certain action on the part of the respon dents, she has suffered the loss for which she has to be compensated. That apar t, the petitioner claims that she has not been paid her salary with effect from the 11th October, 2010. The respondents are admittedly the private companies registered under the Indian Companies Act, having the registered office in Bangalore in the State of Karnat aka. That being the position, the writ does not lie against them. That apart, the que stion of fact raised by the petitioner in the present petition cannot be determi ned in the writ proceeding by this Court in exercise of the jurisdiction under A rticle 226 of the Constitution of India, for determination of which the petition er is to approach the appropriate Civil Court having the jurisdiction over the m atter. In view of the above, the writ petition is not entertained. However, the petiti oner may approach the appropriate Civil Court having jurisdiction over the matte r for redressal of her grievances, if so advised. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs.