CRM No. M 20264 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 20264 of 2010 Date of decision: 12.08.2010 Amrit Pal Singh ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Petitioner in person Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State Mr. Kuldip Sanwal, Advocate for respondent No. 1 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking direction that trial of the complaint bearing No. Pch. 12 dated 24.12.08/09 filed under Section 406, 498-A IPC pending before learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Patiala be concluded expeditiously and in a time bond manner, preferably within three months. Notice of motion was issued. Vide order dated 19.07.2010 passed by this Court, Jaskiran Kaur-complainant was impleaded as respondent No. 2. CRM No. M 20264 of 2010 2 Today, Mr. Kuldip Sanwal, Advocate appeared on behalf of respondent No. 2 and stated that he has no objection if the necessary direction to expedite the trial is given. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for respondent No. 2 as well as taking into account the prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to expedite the trial and dispose of the complaint in question preferably within six months. However, it is made clear that neither the petitioner nor the complainant shall seek unnecessary adjournment in order to delay the trial. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge August 12, 2010 mohan