IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 20TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 29TH BHADRA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 916 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.12771/2003 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ------------------------- A.DAMODARA PANICKER, S/O. LATE SHRI. APPUNNI PANICKER, AGED 70, RESIDING AT ARICHALI, KALARICKAL HOUSE, P.O.VETTOM, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.BOSE SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN RESPONDENT(S): 4TH RESPONDENT ----------------------------- SHRI. C.P.MOIDEENKUTTY, S/O. (FATHER'S NAME, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), RESIDING AT MALAPPURAM AND AT PRESENT WORKING AS DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATHS, MALAPPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P. NANDAKUMAR. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Cont. Case(C) No. 916 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 20th day of September, 2010. J U D G M E N T Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since in the affidavit now filed by the respondent, it has been stated that in respect of the other amounts due to the petitioner, if the petitioner files an application it will be duly considered, no further proceedings are necessary in this contempt case. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.