‘S‘ingm $wngh Cl~§x “913/ ....~\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR C.G.l WRIT PETITION (S) N0. @D (2011 PETITIONER / Chinta Ram Soni S/o Late Shri Mansa Ram Soni Aged-about 59 years, Patwari, R/o Mega, Tahsil—Magarlod, Distt.— Dhamtari [C.G.] VERSUS RESPONDENTS /' 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary— Revenue Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur [C.G.] /“2. Collector, Dhamtari, Distt.— Dhamtari[C.G.] /3. Joint Collector, Dhamtari, Distt.- Dhamtari [C.G.] 4. Tahsildar, Tahsil- Magarlod, / Distt.-Dhamta1i[c.o.] WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTIONS HmH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT Bn/Asm’m WRIT PETH‘EON ( S) NQ‘ 669G 0f2011 PETITIONER Chinta. Ram qom ’VRR SI JS State of Chhai1isgarh &: Others. RESPONDENTS WR IT PETTTION UNDER ARTIC} P 226 OF 'I‘HF, CONS'HTI H‘ION OF INDIA SR: Hnn’hle Shri Satish K. Agnihmri. J. M \ Present: Shri Sanjay Pate}; Advocate For the petitioner Shli Arum Sam, Govammem Advocate for ‘Lhe Staie/rasptmdenls 0 R I) E R (Passed on 16‘“ day ofNovember, 2011) \1 ,v 1. Leamed caunsel appearing for the petitioner, on inmnlctions, seeks permission of this Court. to withdraw this petition on The gmund ihat the petitioner wants to make a, represenialion to Ihe respendent amhorities, 2. Learned counsel appearmg for other side has no obj ection, 3. it is ordered accordingly 4. Consequently, the writ peiiiion is dismisseii a< withdrawn with the aforestated observation. Sd/— SATISH K. ANGNIHOTRI Judge ‘ Amit