IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 503 OF 2008 SHRI. NAKUL NAIK ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. UDAY VAMAN MADKAIKAR AND 11 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. E. Dias, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Government Advocate for the Respondent no.12. Coram:- A. P. DESHPANDE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 7th October, 2008 P.C. A limited grievance is made by the Petitioner about the pendency of Revision Application before the Co-operative Tribunal since August 2006. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the term of the elected body would be over by 31.03.09 and fresh election would be due. Having regard to the relief that we propose to grant to the petitioner, we do not deem it necessary to issue notice to Respondent nos. 1 to 9 as the Order we propose to pass would not prejudice any of the parties. Having regard to the peculiar facts of the case, we direct the Co-operative Tribunal to dispose off the Revision Application no. 6/2006 filed by the Respondent nos. 1 to 9, after affording opportunity to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months from today. 2. With this direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed off. A. P. DESHPANDE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. arp/*