THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2939 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner/judgment debtor filed this revision aggrieved by the docket order dated 22.04.2010 passed in I.A.No.655 of 2010 in A.S.No.53 of 2010 on the file of the Court of I Additional District Judge, East Godavari, Rajahmundry, only to the extent of condition of deposit of half of the decretal amount and costs. The petitioner/judgment debtor filed A.S.No.53 of 2010 before I Additional District Judge, East Godavari, Rajahmundry, questioning decree dated 14.10.2009 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry, in O.S.No.65 of 2008 which was filed by the respondent for recovery of an amount of Rs.1,72,000/- based on a pronote dated 05.12.2004. In the appeal suit, the petitioner also filed I.A.No.655 of 2010 seeking stay of execution proceedings in E.P.No.18 of 2010 which was filed by the respondent for executing the decree passed in the suit. The learned District Judge, by the impugned docket order, stayed the execution proceedings subject to condition of the petitioner depositing half of the decretal amount and costs on or before 30.04.2010. Feeling aggrieved to the extent of condition of deposit of half of the decretal amount and costs, the petitioner is before this Court. It is the normal practice that the appellate Court is consistently passing orders of stay of money decrees subject to the condition of deposit of half of the decretal amount and costs, unless special circumstances and reasons warrant departing from such procedure. In the affidavit filed by the petitioner in support of I.A.No.655 of 2010, except stating that the pronote is forged and he got strong case in the appeal and that to harass him and to get unlawful enrichment, the respondent initiated the execution proceedings, no other extraordinary circumstances or special reasons are forthcoming from departing the usual practice. In view of the same, the discretion exercised by the Court below does not suffer from any illegality warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. The time granted for deposit of half of the decretal amount and costs is extended till the end of July, 2010. No costs. __________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J 16th July, 2010 GHN