HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) No. 3402 of2007 ".s^ PETITIONERS <.•-- RESPO^TDENTS 1. Hridaya Narayan Jain Age about 46 year, Asstt. Teacfaer S/o Shri Ghagau Ram Jain Prunary School Khora Block - Bhanupratappur, Distt. - Kanker(C.G.) 2. Nandram Verm Age about 48 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Shri Firturain Verma Middle School Tarhul Block - Durgikondal, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) 3. Aman Kumar Dehari Ass about 46 vear, Asstt. Teacher S/o Shri Gopal Ram Dehari Priniary Schol Salihapara, Tumguhan Block Bhanupratappur, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) 4. Bhajaa Siagh Mandavi Age about 47 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Sfari Ghasiya Rani Maiidavi Primaty Schooi Iragaon, Block - Bliaaupratappur, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) 5. Laxman Singh Kawde Age about 44 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Shri Patwari Rain Kawde Girls Primary School Medo Block - DurgikondaL Distt.-Kanker(C.G.) 6. Bhagwan Singh Gautam Age about 52 year, Asstt. Teacher, S/o Late Shri Ganesh Singli Gautam Middle School Hatkarra Block - Bhanupratappur, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) 7. Tosfaan Ram Sinha Age about 45 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Shri Kartik Rani Govt. Hi^i School Kurrutola Block - Charama, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.), 8. Ratan Ram Yadav Age about 45 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Shri Sakharam Yadav Priniary School Parrekodo Block - Durgukondal, Disttt. Kanker(C.G.) VERSVS <to 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Tribal Welfare Department & Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) 2. Astt. Comnrissioner Tribal Welfare Department Kanker, Disst. Kanker (C.G) 3. District Education OfBcer Kanker, District - Kaiiker(C.G.) 4. Block Education OfBcer Bhanupratappur / '»at 'y "•^" Charama / Durgukondal District - Kanfcer (C.G.) 5. Treasure & Accounts Kanker, District - Kanker WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA. Single Bench : Hon'ble Justice Shri Satish K. AfinBiotri. Pi-esent: Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitiQners. Sliri Y.S.Thakur, Govt. Advocate for fhe State/respondents. I. 2. 3. (PassedQn21stdayofJune,2007) . The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.ffhe date ofinitial appointment or fi-om the date ofcompletion ofprobation period. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the faets aad question of law involved in fhe present writ petition are fhe same as to that ofin W.P.(S) No.58 of 2007 (Paras Nath Gupta Vs^ State of Chhatttsgarh & QtheN), which was allowed vide order dated 15.01.2007. In view ofthe above-stated submissions made bvleamed counsel for the parties, fhe writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit l 'sr ::: ' :