IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 15203 of 2009 Between: Shaik Rasool Bee W/o.Late Shaik Jani Saheb R/o.H.No.2/98, Big Mosque Street, Near 'E' Seva Sri Kalahasthi, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND The Revenue Divisional Officer-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Nellore, Nellore District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order, direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or other appropriate writ or direction to the respondent here in to consider the representation dt. 24.12.2008 filed by the Petitioner and further direct the respondents submit report before this Hon'ble Court immediately in the interest of the Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.SARAVANA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : O R D E R:- The petitioner asserts that she is the absolute owner and possessor of an extent of Ac.19.30 cents of land in Sy.No.2197 situated at Servaypalli Bit No.2, Ramadas Kandriga village, Venkatachala Mandal, Nellore District. While so, the District Collector, issued a Notification dated 20.7.2006 proposing to acquire an extent of Ac.2.03 cents out of the total extent of the petitioner’s land for the purpose of laying two lane road from Venkatachalam to Krishnapatnam Port, and subsequently, the respondent passed an Award dated 31.3.2007 granting compensation to one V. Hari Krishna in respect of the extent of Ac.2.03 cents of land belonging to the petitioner. Then, the petitioner made a representation dated 24.12.2008 requesting the respondent not to pay compensation to V.Hari Krishna, who has nothing to do with the land in question, and also to conduct an enquiry with regard to the title of the land in dispute. Now, it is her grievance that the respondent has not passed any orders on her representation, and is going to pay compensation to the third party ignoring her claim. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition appearing for the respondent, on instructions, has submitted that the respondent has not paid the amount of compensation to any third party and in view the title dispute, the amount is deposited in civil Court of law. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition. Since the representation dated 24.12.2008 said to have been made by the petitioner is pending consideration before the respondent and having regard to the submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that the respondent has not paid the amount of compensation to any third party and the same is deposited in the civil Court of law in view of title dispute between the parties, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: “The respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer-cum-Land Acquisition Officer is directed to consider the representation dated 24.12.2008 said to have been made by the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, and communicate the same to the petitioner.” Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 29th July, 2009 bcj