{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13388 OF 2010 IN CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.29393 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 982 OF 2005 Madhavrao s/o Wamanrao Karkhane (deceased) through L.Rs. Applicants Versus Shrinivasrao s/o Kisanrao Karkhane (deceased) through L.Rs & another Respondents Mr.Milind Patil, advocate for applicants CORAM : S.S.SHINDE, J. DATE : 30 th November, 2011 PER COURT: Issue notice to the respondents returnable on 17.01.2012. S.S.SHINDE JUDGE adb/ca13387.10 {2} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13387 OF 2010 IN CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.29395 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 982 OF 2005 Madhavrao s/o Wamanrao Karkhane (deceased) through L.Rs. Applicants Versus Shrinivasrao s/o Kisanrao Karkhane (deceased) through L.Rs & another Respondents Mr.Milind Patil, advocate for applicants CORAM : S.S.SHINDE, J. DATE : 30 th November, 2011 PER COURT: Heard learned Counsel for the applicants. Though Respondents are served and appearance is entered, none is present for the respondents. Perused contents of the application. For the reasons disclosed in paras 7 to 10, it appears that delay has been satisfactorily explained. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) and stands disposed of. S.S.SHINDE JUDGE adb/ca13387.10