IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45166 of 2009 UMESH BHAGAT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18. 12. 2009. This application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for modification of the order dated 20. 11. 2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 39688 of 2009 whereby regular bail was granted to the petitioner with one of the condition that the father of the petitioner should stand as a surety as one of the bailors. By the present application it has been brought to the notice of the Court that the father of the petitioner expired on 16. 06. 1993 and which is also apparent from the F.I.R. that the father of this petitioner is no more alive. But due to inadvertence and over-sight, this fact was not mentioned in the bail petition which shows that father of the petitioner is alive. Having regard to the statements setforth and the circumstance that the father of the petitioner expired on 16. 06. 1993, this condition stipulated in the order dated 20. 11. 2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 39688 of 2009, requiring his father to stand as a surety, is modified that one of the bailors should be close relative of the petitioner who should clearly indicate his relationship with the petitioner. The order dated 20. 11. 2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 39688 of 2009 is modified to that extent and shall be deemed to have been incorporated in the said order and read as 2 such. Let a copy of this order be communicated to court below through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. This application stands disposed of. SKBOSE (Jyoti Saran)