IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 21ST OCTOBER 2010 / 29TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 32232 of 2010(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHIHABUDHEEN, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.ALIYARUKUNJU, VALIYAVILA HOUSE, PARAKULLAM, UMAYANALOOR, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN SRI.M.D.SASIKUMARAN SRI.GEORGE MATHEW SRI.DIPU JAMES SMT.K.V.RAMYA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-01. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM-691 001. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION, ERAVIPURAM, KOLLAM-691 011. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/10/2010, ALONG WITH WPC.32236/2010 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) Nos.32232, 32236 and 32247 of 2010 ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 21st day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T In these Writ Petitions, the petitioners complain that their vehicles have been detained on the allegation that these vehicles were used for transportation of river sand in violation of the provisions contained in the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001. According to the petitioners, they have made applications for interim custody of the vehicles, their applications were not considered. With this common grievance, these Writ Petitions have been filed. 2. A Full Bench of this Court in Shan C.T. Vs. State of Kerala [2010 (3) KHC 333] has laid down the manner in which such applications for interim custody should be dealt with. Therefore, all that is necessary in these Writ Petitions is to direct the statutory authority, before whom the applications have been made, to deal with the applications in the light of W.P.(C) No.32232/10 & connected cases : 2 : the provisions of the Act referred above and in the manner as directed by the Full Bench of this Court in the judgment referred as above. Ordered accordingly. 3. Petitioners will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the concerned authority for appropriate action. These writ petitions are disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge