IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10087 of 2011 Kedar Nath Jha, son of Late Mukti Nath Jha, resident of Village + P.O. Pathra, P.S. Pipra, District Supaul. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director, Department of Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Superintendent of Education, Supaul. 4. The District Provident Fund Officer, Supaul. 5. The Headmaster, Garhiya Primary School, Pipra, District Supaul. 6. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondents. ----------- 2. 29.6.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Rajesh Kumar, learned A.C. to G.P.10, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 5 and Shri Kumar Priya Ranjan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.6/Accountant General, Bihar. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 31.1.2005 as Assistant Teacher from Gadhariya Primary School, Pipra, Supaul, has prayed for directing the respondents, particularly respondent nos.3 and 4/District Superintendent of Education, Supaul and District Provident Fund Officer, Supaul respectively to make payment of difference of salary deposited in the 2 G.P.F. account in between 1.1.1971 to 31.5.1973, payment of amount of G.P.F. deducted from 1.1.1971 to 1973 with statutory interest and payment of differences of G.P.F. deducted on account of due Time Bound Promotion between the period 1.4.1981 to 31.8.1989 with admissible interest. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the relief sought for in the writ petition, the petitioner has also filed number of representations. However, all went in vain. With the consent of parties, the writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent nos.3 and 4 within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, both the respondents are required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondents consider the claim of the 3 petitioner as genuine, they are required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, both the respondents are directed to pass a speaking order within three months from the date of filing of such representation. It goes without saying that petitioner shall be entitled to get admissible statutory interest. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)