8WGLEBENCH BEFOREJH E HON^LE H IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P(S)NO.U/J//'L of 2011 PETITIONER C.R. Kaushik, aged about 57 years, S/o Shri B.R. Kaushik, posted as Ward Boy, Primary. Health Centre, Rampur, District-Korba (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS /:1. StateofChhattisgarh, Through : the Secretary, Department of Health & Family Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) /l. The Director, Health Services, Raipiir ^y/ (C-G') ^/^'n.-^\ ^3 Chief Medical& Health Officer.Korba, District-Korba (C.G.) \> ^M^ /yy -S'(i- /'' <^<y <? i^'A. Block Medical Officer, Community Health Centre, Kartala; District-Korba (C.G.) WRIT^ETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE_CONST1TUTION OF INDIA; c^y .^ ^ST "i||'41<?l<<, ®xlty-i|(o,feTR-Ty —..^..^S.).^.:..itWiljnL w SRI^T 'V^V t^yff) SB^i^f^N; 'nisiiinwOT? SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mohan Snnvastava, J. 09-08-2011 Shri Gautam Khetrapal, coui Smt. Smita Ghai, Panei Law The flrievance raised bv the petitioner has been worKlng as dc for reguiarization has not beei Government has come out with a 5/3/08 to consider as one time employees who areentitled for the Supreme Court in the case of v. Uma Devi (3) and others (2006) Isei for the petitioner. |'er for the State on advance copy. tsetitioner in this petition is that thou.qh the jiiy waae employee since 1 982, his case ih considered even thou.qh the State t>oiicv of reguiarization vide circuiar dated •jieasure the cases of those daily wage co|isideration in the light of the judgment of ISecretary, State of Karnataka and others empioyees who have been appoin( rurther submits that the petitioner daily wa.ge employees because h| his name was calied from the emtilovment vide memo dated 27/4/2010 (Ar^nexure Officer has required the Block Medi records of the service of the petiticjner be considered ror regulanzation, finaiized. akina into conslderation tr|( for the petitioner, it would be prop|6 ^TI^N ?t^r^pin^T, <ftl*{f<iT<iflT 'WR^f ^f 'feT3t '<f<(t^l< ^sifinsff^i SCC 1. He submits that larae number of ted after him, have been reautarized. He fetands on much better footina than other was appointed after due selection and office. It is aiso submitted that P/7), the.Chief Medical Health ical Officer to make avaiiabie the reievant so that the case of the petitioner may but till date, the matter has not been |e submlssions made bv learned counsel ir and expedient to direct respondents to -i''S/140—2/2011—i,50,000. ^sr "4i<4id-4, ^Til'y'ie, isictiyy . . LOf='C3^>-o- ^^//-' 3n^?r ^?^r (^iyS?) aiAn'%r1?iih? •^^T 3ii^?? ^iN? Deepti IHTi^l'ST^^T; TOiwfltetw^i — ^ consider the case of the petitioni with iaw and the auidelines laid Uma Devi (Supra) and circuiar dal to consider the cases of eiigible d< Accordin.gly, respondent Nc| petitloner for reguiarization and tc delav. Respondent No.4 shaii eN all reievant service recoras to re^ constderatlon of the claim for regu with the aforesaid disDosed off. |r for reauiarlzation, strictiy in accordance d|own by the Supreme Court in the case of ijed 5/3/08 issued by the State Government iiiiy waae employees for reciuiarization. 1.3 is direcied to consider the ciaim ot' the '^TZrf?RN 'RTO^ff^^^ <P^^T^ 1; .SfRTtt 3!I^!fr iftend full co-operation and maKe avaiiabie f.oondent No.3 to faciiltate aue and proper larization. observ|ations / directions, the petrtion is finalty Sd/~ ManindraMohaiiShrivastava -TS/140—2/2011—1,50,