THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.13167 of 2006 Dated:29.06.2006 Between: G.Ashok Goud, and another. …Petitioners and The Commissioner, Prohibition & Excise, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, and others. …Respondents ORDER: The petitioners claim to be the owners of the premises bearing No.23-1-1075/1 & 2 situated at Pancha Mohalla, which was let out to the third respondent for running a retail shop for sale of liquor. The petitioners state that as per the terms and conditions of the lease deed, the period of lease expires on 30.06.2006, however, the third respondent without revealing the same, had obtained the lease for the period 2006-2008 and that respondents 1 and 2 are about to grant the licence in his favour. In the circumstances, the petitioners made a representation, dated 26.06.2006, bringing to the notice of respondents 1 and 2 the fact that the lease in favour of the third respondent is valued only upto 30.06.2006. The petitioners allege that the said objections have not yet been considered by respondents 1 and 2. Hence this Writ Petition. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Excise and Prohibition appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and keeping in view that the representation made by the petitioners has been received by respondent Nos.1 and 2 on 26.06.2006, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the said representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity to the third respondent to put forth his version. No order as to costs. ____________ (G.ROHINI, J) Dated:29.06.2006 GJ