24.2.2009 Present: Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A. G. with Mr. Vivek Thakur, Addl. A. G. for the respondents. CWP(T) No.2189/2008 (OA No.1892/1993) The impugned order dated 7.9.1992 (Annexure A-1) has been assailed for the reasons that the same does not assign any reasons. The petitioner has further prayed that the respondent-State be directed to consider the claim of the applicant for promotion as Ayurvedic Chikitsa Adhikari w.e.f. 1985 with all consequential benefits. The impugned order admittedly does not assign any reasons for rejecting the petitioner’s representation. From the reply filed by the State, it is not clear as to why the petitioner was promoted only w.e.f. 1991. Let the State pass a speaking order keeping in view the material on record and more particularly the judgment dated 16.6.1989 (Annexure A-5) passed by the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal. The matter be decided by a speaking order within a period of eight weeks from today. With the aforesaid observations, the petition stands disposed of. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. February 24, 2009 (rana)