^ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) -WRIT PETITION N0. ^S32- /2004 PETITIONER R.L. Dohare, aged about 59 years, son of Shri Sarulal Dohare, caste-Satnami (Schedu+ed Caste), resident of - Sarangarh, Tah. Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS »•*' ^^ ,^$^ .-^o^ ^yy ^1> The State of Chhattisgarh, through, the Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. The Deputy Director, Department of Public Education, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) The District Collector, Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) '^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI- •W^'ER^IRT T ^T SH^T ^THN? 7^ '^ITqi^PT, ^xfl'H'iS, Mivli<<4.< ^f a8r2^l o-S' 311^51'q^?7(' ^iNf^^l tT!^ff ^ 'fe^ <E^t^.l< ^?3ffiPT31I^t 01-11-aoo4 Sfari'Roop Naik, Counael J|br fhe petitioner. SIm V.V.S. Miu-thy, Dy. AMiJl Agrawal, Pancl Lawyer for|the State. Application for urgent heajrmg is aUcwed. Heard. Leamed counscl for thel luatter relatcs to tnuisfcr ofl submits fhat the petitioner is ajged about 59 years aad he K at fhe fag ead of lus retiremc4t. Hc also submits that the petitioner is suSGeriug fixna Aiinexure-P/ 2 ia tfae dociunent diy» DtuSddeTual Ulce;r ^ai?*^ Ito this eflfect. He also subniils tliat for thc prestajit llic p^titiouer uiay be givcu au opportuntly of flling ttie detBtjed representatioa before Itic competent aufhority of the r^spondcnte, wfaich sfaatl be conaidered ou its own merite ia witlioul. expicssiug auy opiui<Hij the opiruon of ttus Court, cnd^ direction is given to fhe petitioner to laake a detailed lepreseatation raising his grie^aaces befiaie ibe coinpeten.t authorily of the reapondento alc^xig -nifh a copy of the petition aud tlus oidcr, wlUuu 10 days beiag filed, tfac competent autti|orily of ttie respoadcnte saaU ^decide the same on its own ineiits in accordance with law by Advocaite Cfcucful willi. Slul petitioner suhmits fhat Itoe thc pcliliuuer. He fiu'Uier laccordance with law. Having considered fhe f^cts and drcumstances and ou llie lucrits of tlic uasts, iu of justice wfll be served if a aud ou suuli icprescutidjou XI-HC—78 "3^ ''fTTI^pt, ®Tii'M<ie,fajdiyy L^f ^^ ^l^ sn^»iTraq? (lyf^<i<i?) 3n?5!tl'f?;fe ""iTsn^rwtns; Gowri N;EiwaafE%>- •^ a reasoned order as eaaSy as pijissible pre&rabty Dffitlun six weeks fioin <l»e date of receipt uiadc clear Qia.l. if auy grievauct^ ^'rafi?!^ ^wv^ ^r [sl<il <fai^i< ^TsiRnaiT^n of the representation. It is sdfl rcuuBUs, tlie peUlioucr may avall the remedy avatlabte u^ider Vxe ]aw. Couasel for the pedtionerl subinits that the petitiona: has not been. BeUeved so far. He prays for atay tiU fhe representation ia decided. lu vtew of Ujc fsicls aud cfat;iunstouces of Uic cuse, it is dtrectea £hat tiffl tlie represea|itatfon 1s dcdded, S t&c petitioner is not relieved, Ue bc alowed to continue. With fhe a&resaid observ^tions, this petition stands dispoaed of. Cuusequeully M.W.P.Nu.4^42/04 alsto stauds disposed Certified copy as per rules. | Fakhruddin Judge