abs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2042 OF 2008 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2373 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO. 1770 OF 2007 Urja Developers & Beautification Pvt. Ltd. .. Plaintiff V/s Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. .. Defendants Mr.P.K. Dhakephalkar i/b Ms.Swati Sawant for the plaintiff. Mr. C.J. Sawant with Mr.P.P. Chavan i/b Mr.V.M. Bhate for the defendants. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 19TH JUNE 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the defendants has no objection for allowing the motion in terms of prayer (a). He however strongly objects for the grant of prayer (b) and submits that such prayer cannot and - 2 - should not be granted. He submits that he had raised an objection even on the previous date about the loss and inconvenience suffered by the defendants on account of the interim order. I see no justification for granting of relief in terms of prayer (b) at this stage. Hence, the motion is granted in terms of prayer (a) only. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)