CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 2157 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2157 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: JULY 19, 2011 Urmila Devi ..Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Naveen S. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction for his appointment to the post of Lecturer in Hindi. The primary grievance raised by the petitioner in this writ petition is that the result of the final selection was destroyed immediately within few days. The counsel not only seeks quashing of the entire selection, but also a direction for carrying out investigation in this case by some independent agency. 1 CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 2157 of 2009 Notice of motion was issued. Reply is filed. Today Mr. Rathee has placed before me an order passed in CWP No.136 of 2009 (Poonam Rani & Poonam Versus State of Haryana), decided on 22.10.2009, where similar selection was under challenge and this Court considering all these pleas including the one now raised by the petitioner, dismissed the writ petition. The said judgment has also been upheld by the Division bench of this Court while deciding the Letters Patent Appeal. In this view of the matter, no case for interference in the present case is made out. Dismissed. July 19, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH) monika JUDGE 2