IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31187 of 2008 DEEPAK TANTI @ CHHIMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.31617 of 2008 SURAJ KUMAR TANTI @ SURAJ KUMAR @ TAKLA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.32841 of 2008 RAJESH TANTI @ LOLBI TANTI Versus STATE OF BIHAR 2. 18.8.2008 Heard. The three petitions on behalf of the above named three petitioners are in a case under Section 392 IPC in which none of them is named as an accused. However, it appears that Rakesh Kumar Singh was arrested and he confessed his guilt and pointed out the place of hiding of the stolen property, a motorcycle and that appears recovered from the possession of petitioner Rajesh Tanti @ Lolbi Tanti. Under the above circumstances, the prayer for bail of Rajesh Tanti @ Lolbi Tanti is dismissed. As regards petitioners Deepak Tanti @ Chhimar and Suraj Kumar Tanti @ Suraj Kumar @ Takla, the two petitioners in spite of being in custody who are not put on test identification - 2 - parade nor anything being recovered from any of them. The contentions further is that the petitioners’ name was implicated in the confession of said Rakesh Kumar Singh. Regard being had to the contentions, let the two petitioners, namely, Deepak Tanti @ Chhimar and Suraj Kumar Tanti @ Suraj Kumar @ Takla be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.3,000/-(three thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Munger in Jamalpur P.S.Case no.37 of 2008. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )