IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.53071 of 2007 MAST RAJ CHAUBEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 15.5.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner has been made accused in Dhanha P.S. Case No.35 of 2007 under Sections 420, 467, 468/34 of the I.P.C. As per the allegations made in the F.I.R. the petitioner had obtained employment as a Block Teacher by furnishing forged certificate with regard to his marks, as alleged in certain complaints made in this regard. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that he had categorically declared that he had 65.2% marks as aggregate and the above marks sheet was verified from the University concerned and the said declaration with regard to the marks was found to be correct. In fact it is the case of the petitioner that some mischief was played in the matter to put the petitioner into difficulty. There seems to be some truth in the matter. Looking at the nature of the allegation as well as the evidence which have been brought on record, let the petitioner, namely, Mast Raj Chaubey, in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties in the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Dhanha P.S. 2 Case No.35 of 2007, subject to conditions under Section 438(II) of the Cr.P.C. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)