IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 23796 of 1999 Between: S.Saritha D/o.Jagannatham MIG.No.226 BHEL, Ramachandrapuram, Medak Dist ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of A.P., rep.by Principal Secretary to Government Medical & health Department A.P.Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 Director of Medical Education Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad 3 Dist. Medical and Health Officer, Medak, Sangareddy 4 S.Soni D/o.David O/o.Headquarters Hospital Sangareddy Medak District 5 N.Premalatha D/o.Kumaraswamy O/o.Headquarters Hospital Sangareddy Medak District ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Art.226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in selecting 4th and 5th respondents to the post of Lab. Attendant in respondent department in Medak District in place of the petitioner herein in deviation of the rules and regulations of the selection procedure as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to appoint the petitioner to the post of Lab.Attendant on merit against the O.C. vacancy available in respondent department in Medak District duly setting aside the selection of respondents 4&5 to the said posts by holding the order of A.P.Administrative Tribunal in OA.No.4368/1999 Dt.2/11/1999 as null and void. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.SUDHAKAR REDDY & NEERAJA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FAMI.WELFARE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.23796 of 1999 ORAL ORDER: (per GHULAM MOHAMMED,J) None appears for the petitioner. Due to efflux of time, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous. _______________________ (Ghulam Mohammed,J) 26th June, 2008 _____________ (C.V.Ramulu,J) prk