IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.R.BANNURMATH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2010 / 2ND MAGHA 1931 WA.No. 118 of 2010 -------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.812/2010 Dated 15/01/2010 .................... APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS: ------------------------------ 1. NEDUMKULANGARA MALA RESIDENTS' ASSOCIATION(NRA), REG. NO.ER-372/08, ATHANI, KAKKANAD, KUSUMAGIRI P.O., KOCHI 682 030, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY - SRI.P.S. NOUSHAD. 2. HAMSA, S/O. SAINU, ARAYIDATHUKUDI HOUSE, NEDUMKULANGARA MALA, KAKKANAD, KUSUMAGIRI P.O., KOCHI 682 030. BY ADV. SRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THRIKKAKARA POLICE STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM. 2. THRIKKAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM. 3. BHARTI TELEVENTURES LIMITED (BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED), BHARTI TOWERS, NH BYPASS, MARADU P.O., KUNDANOOR, KOCHI. 4. WIRELESS - TT INFO SERVICES LIMITED, REGISTERED OFFICE AT 5-9-62, 5TH FLOOR KHAN LATEEF KHAN(KLK) ESTATE, FATEH MAIDAN ROAD, HYDERABAD 500 001. 5. MATHEW K. GEORGE, KOYIKKARA HOUSE, KUSUMAGIRI P.O., KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM. 6. K.P. REENY, KOYIKKARA HOUSE, KUSUMAGIRI P.O., KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER, SMT. K. MEERA. R2 BY ADV. SRI. S. SHANAVAS KHAN, SC. R4 BY ADV. SRI.A. MOHAMMED MUSTAQUE. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.R.Bannurmath, C.J. & Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. ------------------------------------------ W.A.No. 118 of 2010 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2010 JUDGMENT S.R.Bannurmath, C.J. Aggrieved by the interim order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 15th January, 2010 directing the police to provide protection to respondents 3 and 4 to instal machinery to receive and transmit all phone signals on the towers already erected in the lands of respondents 5 and 6, the present writ appeal is filed. 2. It is seen that, even on the earlier occasion, a Division Bench of this Court had occasion to look into the grievances of the appellants and other like minded persons and even there it was noted that as there was obstruction, right from the beginning, police had been directed to give protection for erection of the tower. In our view, the present interim order is practically continuation of those directions issued earlier and as W.A.No.118 of 2010 such, we see no merit in the appeal, especially when it is against an interim order. Writ appeal is, therefore, dismissed. S.R.Bannurmath, Chief Justice Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge vns