IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Civil Writ Petition No.3717 of 2009. Date of decision: 20.05.2010. Anjana Dhiman …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Another …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Dev Darshan Sud,Judge Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr.V.D. Khidtta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr.R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr.J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.(Oral): The petitioner applied for a permanent post of TGT(Arts). It appears that an objection has been taken to the effect that she does not possess required qualification. She is a graduate with the following subjects i.e. English, Psychology and Public Administration. 2. According to the respondents, the qualification required is English with two elective subjects other than Psychology and Public Administration. We are afraid that this contention cannot be appreciated. We have already held in our judgment in CWP No.171 of 2010 that the qualification required as per R and P Rules at the time of calling for the applications would be sufficient. Even otherwise we find from the reply that on the basis of clarification of the 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 Directorate of Elementary Education, dated 31.10.2009, the petitioner has to be considered as per R&P Rules. Therefore, we dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to take further steps in the matter for appointment on the basis of the marks obtained by the petitioner in the interview and in the written test. The needful shall be done within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of this writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of so also the pending application(s). Dasti copy on usual terms. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Dev Darshan Sud), Judge. May 20, 2010 (aks/r)