IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2269 of 2005 Mukhdeo Paswan Versus State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 4. 12.10.2011 On 28.9.2011 no one had appeared for the petitioner. The Court had therefore disposed the proceeding. Before rising of the Court Counsel for the petitioner had made a motion for reasons of which the Court directed the matter to be placed today for consideration. Earlier also no one had appeared for the petitioner. Premptory time was granted to remove the defects. Non compliance led to dismissal of this application on 13.8.2008. MJC No. 1291 of 2009 was then filed for restoration. That also came to be dismissed on 14.10.2009 but was subsequently restored on 30.3.2011 in MJC No. 3843 of 2009. Keeping in mind that a contempt application is primarily between the Court and the person against whom the violation of the order of the Court is alleged, keeping in mind the conduct of the petitioner himself, the Court is not persuaded to proceed with the present mater. The proceedings are closed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)