1001sa568.10.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO.568 of 2010 Yadeorao Tukara Gonnade and anr. ..vs.. Prabhakar Jethamal Ninawe and ors. ............................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ............................................................................................................................................................... Mr.N.S.Talmale, Adv. for the appellant. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : 10th January, 2011. Both the courts below have concurrently held that the plaintiffs are entitled to enter Plot No.11 for cleaning of the drainage and pipe-line, which plot belongs to the defendants. It appears that prior to the filing of the suit, a settlement was arrived at between the parties whereby the plaintiffs were to close the opening of the door which was on the plot of the defendants. That the plaintiffs have done, so also they have filed pursis to that effect at Exh.60 in the first appellate court. In my view, the decree passed by the courts below has been passed with a view that both the parties, who are neighbours, live amicably. Both the courts below have recorded concurrent findings of fact on the plaintiffs’ entitlement. In my view, no substantial question of law is involved. The Second Appeal is accordingly dismissed. JUDGE chute 1001sa568.10.odt 2