gst 1 wp9102.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO. 9102 OF 2010. Thakur Vikram Singh Tank Balsingh ... ... ..Petitioner. V/s The Executive Engineer PWD & Anr.... ... ..Respondents. Mr.V.R.Tripathi, Adv. For the petitioner. Mr.S.R.Rajguru, Adv. For the respondent. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. 12th Jan., 2011. PC: The petitioner challenges the order dated 23.8.2010 vide which the notice of motion filed by the present petitioner for grant of interim mandatory injunction to direct the defendant-respondent to reconstruct at their costs the suit structure which was allegedly demolished came to be rejected. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned trial Court has itself observed while coming to conclusion that for considering the notice of motion it is necessary that evidence is recorded. He submits that inspite of said observation notice of motion has been dismissed. 3. I find that it would be in the interest of justice that the suit itself is decided on its merits. Learned trial Court is therefore directed to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six months from today. Needless to state that the petitioner would be at liberty to amend the plaint and pray for subsequent relief regarding reconstruction and that the same would also be decided at the stage of the suit. Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly.