IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8070 of 2008 SRI KANT PATHAK, son of Late Bhagwat Pathak, resident of Village Bathna Mahodutt, P.O. Sondho, P.S. Mahua, District Vaishali at Hajipur. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The District Superintendent of Education, Vaishali at Hajipur. 3. The Provident Fund Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur. 4. The Treasury Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur. 5. The Area Education Officer, Mahua-1, District Vaishali at Hajipur. 6. The Headmaster, Nationalised Middle School, Chand Sarai, Anchal Mahua, Distrtict Vaishali at Hajipur. 7. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 10.2.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr Braj Kishore Prasad Sinha, learned Government Pleader no.3 appearing for the State. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of difference of retiral dues as highlighted in this writ application. It is submitted that for redressal of the grievances, the petitioner had earlier filed a representation before the District Superintendent of Education, Vaishali at Hajipur on 19th of April, 2008, as contained in Annexure 1. However, the same has remained unconsidered till date. Notwithstanding the above, for expeditious disposal of the grievances as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the District Superintendent of Education, Vaishali at Hajipur (respondent no.2). In 2 case such a representation is filed stating the details of the unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, respondent no.2 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner raised in his representation could be redressed without further delay. Upon consideration, if the representation of the petitioner is found not acceptable, the petitioner shall be informed of the same with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)