^ ^" ^- HIGH COUTRT OF CHHATTISCyURH. BELASPUR W.P.(Sl Np, 6747 of 2007 PETITIONER Satyendia Kuamr Sahu, s/o Late Reshaia Lal Sahu, aged about 28 years, r/o vilk^e Baloda, P.S. Baloda, Tahsil Janjgir, DistrictJaajgir Chaiapa (C.G). Versus RBSPONDENT8 1. State of Chliattegarh, fhrou^i Secrctary, School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.O). 2. District Education offieer, Jaujgn- Champa(C.G) 3. CoUector, DMtrict Janjgir Champa (C.O) WRIT PBTITION OHDBR ARTICLB 226 OF THB CONSriTirFB3N or mpiA Appearance: ShriY. KaUash Rao, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, P.L. appeara for fhe State on advance copy. ORAL Om>ER (17.11.2007) SUMIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard on admission. Learaed counsel for the petitioaer ai^ucs fhat father of the petitioner died in hamess, ttieiefore, the petitiouM' was given conipassionate appoiatment on thc post of Shlksha Karmi, Grade-III, by order dated 29.7.2004 (Annexure P-2). He submlts fhat as aa effect of fhe aforesaid ^ipointment order, the petitiouer is contiauously workmg on fhe said post, but his serviccs have not been regularized so far. The petitioaer has prayed for issuaace of maadamus to the respondents to convert petitioner's appointmcnt fiom. temporaiy appoiafeaent to regular appoiatmeut wifh retrospective effect. Admittedly, the appoiatment of the petitioner is subject to the rules applicable in case of Shiksha KamiM. The rvdss relattag to scrvice eonditions of ShUssha Karkmi would autoiaaticaUy be inade appUcable to fhe case of the petitioner. Accordiag to such rules, at fhie appropriate time, the petitk>ner shaU. be entitled for his regularization- ia accoidaace wifh law. ^ .1^ -2- W.PfS).Na6747 of2007 Leamed counsel for the petitioner could not point out violation of any rules which govera the service condittoas of Shiksha Kanni. In the facts and circumstances of fhe cese, I am not inclined to admit this petition for fiirther hearing. The petition has no nierit aud fhe same is disposed of at the aiotion staye itself. . However, it is inade clear that this order wIU. not come in ftie way of regularization of fhe petitioner if in usual terms he attaius the status for regularization ia his services. Sd/- SunilKumar Sinha Judge fRao/