^ ^l^^j^, S^^l in'Qvs »®«BU IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR W.P. f c) No. /2011 PETITIONER <^M< ..-•""^" b-> ^0""-^" ..••••" ^y^" ^"x..•••"" <>^-' 'Shatrughan Das S/0 Mandas Aged about 68 years Occupation Kotwar R/0 Village Rakhi Tahsil Aarang Dist - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RBSPONDENTS (1) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary , Department of Revenue Mantralaya,D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur ( C.G.) <' (2) Collctor, Raipur Dist-Raipur (C.G.) »--" (3) Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Raipur Dist RaipurfC.G.) ws^ (4)Chief Executive Officer B^ga'iEa''-***;d~'""*i'Klg3Big^^^B^'s«^i—^&« 'TGunpri^.lun^rgi^ft&iw^iLSbuwNUk.1' -i"-"--. ••^IT*^^"—— —.....-— '•"•"•'„•—-:r-" •^ 'w~ei'~?sSS3.SfSTet-^,s"a^'^^, New Raipur Development Authority Telibandha Jedhi Vila Near Natioanl Garage Ring Road Raipur Dist Raipur ( C.G.) (5) Nazul Officer Capital Area Development Authority Raipur ( Chhattisgarh ) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 226/227 OF THE CONStITUTION OF WDIA .-•^-"-^; ^'\ 'Se '-^'T^. -? y 3 y^A<^ s"^^ mpH COURT OF CHHAmSQARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRTT PETmONTC) No. 3648 of2Qll Shatrughan Das. KE8PONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WEIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTnvnON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenthotri. J. Present: Shri Atul Pandey, Advoeate fwthe petttfoner. Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Deputy Advocate Gaieral forlfae State/ respondent No. 1 to 3. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Advocate for Ae respondeart No. 4. OaDERfORAL) (Passed on 12°1day ofJuly, 2011) Leamed coimsel appearing for tiie petitioner saubniits that the respondents may be directed to consider and dedde the representation ofthe petitioner for allolment ofaltemative land in compliance ofthe directions ofthe Adarsh Rehabilitation policy of the Chhattisgarh State, 2007 and thereafter, acquire the land granted to fhe petitioner, as service land. Shri Paadev further suhmits that in aa identieal mattw i.e. Kotwar Associatton ofChattfsgarh v. State ofCMwttisgarh & Others^, this Court has disposed of the petition of the Kotwar Association by giving fhe members an opportunity to file individual appiieations/ representations with a directian to eonsider aad decide the sanae in aecordance wilh law and in accordance vrith the provisions ofthe Adarsh Rehabilitatiffli policy of the Chhattisgaxh State, 2007. Thus, this petition may also be disposed ofin the same tenns. W.P.(C)No. 7524/2009, decided on 12.01.2010 3. Leamed couiBel appeasmg for ofher side do not controvert the above suhmission and suhmit that fhey have no objectfon if the petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed in Kotwcsr Association ofChhattisgarh (supra) 4. In view of Ihe above submissions made by leamed coimsel appearing for the parties, this petition is disposed ofin terms ofthe order passed in Kotwar Association ofChhattisgarh (supra) i.e. tfae petitioner may file a fosh application before the app-opriate authority in accordance with law for yaat of patta/allotmeirt of land and ifsuch applieation is filed, it shall be disposed ofby the concemed authority in accordance whfa l3ae revenue laws and also keeping in mind fhe provisions oftfae Adarsh Rehabilitation poKcy ofthe Chhattisgarh State, 2007. Sd/- SatishK.Agniiiotri Judge •^r'