S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO. 297/2008 Panchu Versus. Municipal Board, Kishangarh. 08/09/2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK PARIHAR. Mr. Sanjay Sharma, for the appellant. Though suit for permanent injunction was decreed by the trial court vide judgment and decree dated 25/01/2002, however, the above judgment and decree passed by the trial court has been reversed and set aside by the lower appellate court vide judgment and decree dated 30/05/2008. After hearing counsel for the appellant, I have carefully gone through the material on record. The lower appellate court on the basis of evidence on record and admission of the plaintiff-appellant himself came to a finding that the plaintiff-appellant had encroached upon the Government land and as per Circulars issued by the State Government, even the regularization could not have been made of such land. Having failed to prove the title and legal right on the land in dispute, the decree of injunction could not have been granted by the trial court. On the basis of findings of fact, since after due consideration proper discretion has already been used by the lower appellate court, in the facts and circumstances, no further interference is called for by this Court, moreso, when no substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed accordingly as having no merits. (Ashok Parihar), J.