IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 294 OF 2009 CANARA BANK THROUGH MANAGER P. K. NAIK ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 4 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Mahesh Amonkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Government Advocate for the respondent no.1 and 3. Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocate for the respondent no.2 and 4. Mr. S. G. Dessai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shivan Dessai, Advocate for the respondent no.5. Coram:- B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 29th June, 2009 P.C. Heard. Respondent no.2 and 4 have pointed out that they have already issued show cause notice and notice to stop work to the respondent no.5 and accordingly the construction work has been discontinued. Learned Senior Advocate Mr. Nadkarni has stated that respondent no.4 Panchayat had issued show cause notice and stop work order to respondent no.5 even before filing of the present writ petition. Learned Senior Advocate Mr. Dessai stated that the concerned respondents have already initiated action against respondent no.5 in the matter and his grievance in the petition does not survive. Learned Advocate Mr. Amonkar has stated that after filing of the petition the Bank learnt about some licence issued by respondent no.2 to respondent no.5 and therefore states that amendment to the petition is necessary. 2. In view of the facts which have come on record, it is apparent that authorities have already started work and have taken cognisance of the alleged unauthorised structure. We therefore, find that atleast at this stage intervention of this Court is not necessary. If the petitioner has got any other grievance against the construction undertaken by the respondent no.5, the petitioner can place it before respondent no.2 and respondent no.4. Respondent no.2 and respondent no.4 can look into it within the frame work of law. 3. With this observation, we dispose of the writ petition as infructuous at this stage. However, that does not mean that respondent no.5 is stopped from ventilating his grievance before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. U. D. SALVI, J. lh/.