IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO : 57 of 2001 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated ______ in WP NO : 18860 OF 2000 on the file of the High Court.) Between: ..... APPELLANT AND ..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.P.SRI RAGHU RAM Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for Respondent No.5: Mr.M.ADINARYANA RAJU The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO : 57 of 2001 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble.Justice T.Meena Kumari) Though the matter is of the year 2001 and listed for final hearing, learned counsel for the appellant is not present when the case is called nor is there any representation on his behalf. The writ appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. _____________________ T.MEENA KUMARI,J Date: 30-06-2008 ____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J GS/ASP