IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2007 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1929 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 4490 of 2007(E) ------------------------------- CRA.187/2004 of ADDL. SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC-2), THRISSUR CC.532/2001 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-II, THRISSUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER: ------------------------------- ABOOBACKER P.A., S/O.ALI AHAMED AGED 55 YEARS, VATTACHLIL VEETTIL, CHITTANDA DESOM, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO SMT.C.M.CHARISMA SRI.N.A.SHAFEEK RESPONDENTS: --------------------------- 1. SINDOORAM JEWELLERS, HEAD OFFICE, 20, THRIKUMARAPUDAM, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR, MANAGER K.L.JOSE REP. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, AYATHILAKAN, AYNIPPILLY HOUSE, THRIKUMARAPUDAM, AYYANTHOLE THRISSUR. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.S.SIVAKUMAR SRI.BENNY VARGHESE (THETTAYIL) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.R.P. No.4490 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 14th day of December, 2007 ORDER The accused in C.C.No. 532 of 2001 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Thrissur for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against him concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A.No. 13075 of 2007 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsels. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. V. RAMKUMAR,JUDGE sj