IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3390 of 2010 1. UTTAM LAL SHARMA S/O LATE SHUKDEO SHARMA R/O VILL.- RUSTAMPUR, P.S. BARHARA KOTHI, DISTT.- PURNEA 2. BRAHMANAND YADAV S/O LATE MANAYAN YADAV R/O VILL.- TAMKULHA, P.O. BARAITH, VIA- MANGUAR, DISTT.- SAHARSA 3. RAJENDRA KUMAR SINGH S/O LATE BINDESHWARI SINGH R/O VILL.- KHARSAHI TOLA, BARHOA, P.O. MAUZAHA, VIA- MERIGANJ, P.S. RANIGANJ, DISTT.- ARARIA 4. RAM CHANDRA KHAN S/O SRI JAIKANT KHAN R/O VILL. & P.O. RAMPUR TILAK, VIA- CHAUPRA RAMNAGAR, P.S. JANKINAGAR, DISTT.- PURNEA 5. PRAYAG MANDAL S/O LATE DEVANAND MANDAL R/O VILL. & P.O. MEHDI, VIA- BHAWANIPUR RAJDHAM, P.S. BHAWANIPUR, DISTT.- PURNEA 6. PRAVEEN KUMAR MANDAL S/O SRI BAGISHWAR MANDAL R/O VILL.- HANSI, P.O. & P.S. GADHBANAILI, DISTT.- PURNEA------------- ------------------------------------PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HEALTH DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, HEALTH SERVICES, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PURNEA 5. THE CIVIL SURGEON-CUM-CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, PURNEA ---- --------------------------------------------RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 13.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 1982 dismissal order cannot be permitted to be challenged as of now as it is a stale cause of action. The benefit which the others were allowed in terms of the Division Bench decision rendered in the case of State of Bihar & others vrs. Sohan Roy along with its analogous cases reported in 2010 (2) PLJR 397 cannot be extended to all similarly situated persons who were not party to the LPA in question. The case in question is not of the kind that it can be refereed to one man committee or the petitioner can be given liberty to approach the committee. This writ application is dismissed in the above background. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)