CD Single Bench BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR wiaa w. P. (S) N0. M7?7\ / 2011 / . Ashok Sonwanl, S/o late G.L. Sonwani, aged about 43 years, presently posted as Range Officer, Mardapal, South Kondagaon, Forest Division Kondagaon (C,G.) PETITIONER VERSUS .i / 1.5V oRESPONDENTS : 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Department Forest, Mahtralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2) “Divisional Forest Officer, South Kondagaon, Forest Division Kondagaon (C‘GJ 3) Kejuram Poyam, Son of not known to the petitioner, Range Officer, West Sonpur, Narayanpur, Forest Division Narayanpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS 13 PETITIONER HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.478’l OF 2011 Ashok Sonwani Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Abhishek Sinha, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER (ORAL) Present :- (Passed on this 19"“ day of August, 201 1) Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge the legality and validity of the order dated 10—8-2011 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Range Officer, Mardapal, South Kondagaon to Range Officer, Kistaram, Sukma Forest Division. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the impugned order suffers from frequent transfers, as within a short span of time, the petitioner has been transferred three times. Learned counsel further submits that the impugned order is against the transfer policy of the State Government. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the State submits that if the petitioner submits a representation raising his grievances within a period of five days, the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits, within a period of two weeks, therefrom. ln view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Certified copy today. A; Sd/— t i Judge ,t a Satish K.Agnihotri f f VGowri ".