IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35356 of 2008 Anup Kumar @ Chotan Pandey @ Anup Kumar Pandey, Son of Sri Ramdayal Pandey, Resident of village Jami Chapra, PS Manjhi, District Saran at Chapra ---- Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Satish Kumar Pandey, Son of Permanand Pandey, Resident of Village Jaichapra, PS Manjhi, District Saran at Chapra ---- Opposite Parties ----------- 2 14.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner has challenged the order of cognizance dated 22.3.2007 passed in Manjhi PS Case No. 89 of 2006. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in fact there is no specific allegation of assault against this petitioner and, therefore, no office is made out under Sections 341, 323, 324 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. On perusal of the First Information Report, it appears that this petitioner was accompanying Vinay Kumar Pandey who is the person responsible for assault and, therefore, the Court has taken cognizance against the petitioner under the aforesaid Sections. At this stage, this Court cannot find any defect in the order of cognizance. The issues raised by the petitioner can be raised by him at the appropriate stage. This application is dismissed. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)