IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13699 of 2011 Md. Zaheer Ansari Versus The State Of Bihar Through Vig ----------- 6 01.07.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, Vigilance and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471, 477A, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(c) of the Prohibition of Corruption Act. It is alleged that the petitioner got the work order from the District Superintendent Education, Saharsa for supplying the chair at the rate of Rs. 710/- and table at the rate of Rs. 1130/-. The contention of the Vigilance is that the actual supply were not made and the forged receiving were taken by this petitioner. It is alleged that the F.I.R. was lodged in pursuance to the order passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 13220 of 2007 which was filed by the petitioner for direction to make payment with regard to the supply of the furniture made by this petitioner. 2 It appears from the writ order that initially, in the counter affidavit the respondent's stand was that the full supply was not made whereas , the in second counter affidavit, the stand was taken that the supply was made of sub-standard quality. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in fact no loss has been caused as the petitioner has not received any payment till date. Considering the fact that no payment was made to the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge Vigilance-II, Patna, in connection with Special Case No. 27 of 2010 arising out of Vigilance P.S. Case No. 75/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) 3