IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12234 of 2010 DHODHO @ MOHAN JHA SON OF LATE YASODHAR MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.4.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 324, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Considering that for misuse of privilege of bail for a period of two and half years, the petitioner has remained in custody since 15.1.2009, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J.II, Khagaria in S.Case No.179A of 1994 arising out of Parbatta P.S.case No.134 of 1993, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and (iii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. - 2 - The court concerned is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it within a period of nine months positively in view of the fact that the occurrence is of the year 1993. The trial court will also consider imposing conditions on the co-accused persons, who have been released on bail, to ensure their attendance during trial. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )