- 1 - 8.ss.2875.10 skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2875 OF 2010 Suresh Nathu Kankar. ..Plaintiff -Versus- Satbirsingh Balkishan Boht ..Defendant .......... Mr. Balbheem S. Patil for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant. .......... CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 21ST DECEMBER 2011. P.C. 1 The suit is filed on the basis of the demand promissory notes. The defendant having failed to make payment, the plaintiff demanded the same by a notice. There was no reply to the notice. The defendant has not filed an appearance. 2 A compilation of documents is tendered in Court, taken on record and marked Exhibit “A” collectively. 3 There is no defence to the suit. There is nothing on record that militates against the averments and submissions in the plaint. This is fit case to accept the averments and submission in the plaint as correct. - 2 - 8.ss.2875.10 4 In the circumstances, the suit is decreed as prayed. However, interest after the date of filing of the suit shall be at the rate of 12% p.a. Costs to be quantified as per rules. Refund, if any, as per rules. -