1 Appln 1538-10 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1538 OF 2010 Jignesh Narendra Mahakal ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.Akhilesh Chauben i/b.ABG And Associates, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.S.D.Shinde, APP, for the Respondent - State WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3897 OF 2010 Francis John Miranda ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.Nihar Ghag , Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.Geeta Mulekar, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 27TH SEPTEMBER, 2010 P.C. . The learned Counsel for the applicants state that the applicants have been in jail for ten months. The learned APP states that 2 Appln 1538-10 the trial has begun and one witness has been examined. Now, the case is fixed for recording of evidence on 11 th October, 2010. The learned Judge would undoubtedly bear in mind that the Session case is required to be completed on day to day basis once the trial commences. The learned APP states that she would instruct the prosecutor in charge in the trial Court as also the investigating officer to ensure that the witnesses are kept present the date on which the case is fixed and would also request that the trial is completed within a week. Both the learned Counsel state that their client will not seek any adjournment before the Sessions Court. 2. In view of this, let the trial be over by the end of October, 2010, if the accused seeks any adjournment, time would be extended correspondingly. 3. Both the Criminal Applications are 3 Appln 1538-10 disposed of. The applicants would have liberty to approach this Court should the trial not be over by the end of November, 2010. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)