IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10173 of 2008 RAJEEV YADAV & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 16/7/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel appearing for the informant. The petitioners renew their prayer for bail on the 3rd occasion in a police case under Sections- 302/34 of I.P.C. It is submitted that they are in custody since 22.1.2005 and the trial was proceeding at a very slow pace. That the co-accused Rajesh Sah has been granted bail by this Court in Cr.Misc.No.2414/05 after initial rejection. The first part of the F.I.R. specifically alleges the petitioners as one of the four persons who fired when the informant is stated to be an eye-witness, three firearm injuries having been found on the deceased. The person granted bail finds reference in the letter portion of the F.I.R. whose name was allegedly disclosed to the informant by the deceased which difference has adequately been considered in the last paragraph of the order - 2 - granting him bail in Cr.Misc.No.2414/05. Learned counsel for the O.Ps. submits that of the 17 charge sheet witnesses, 10 have been examined. The 11th was at the stage of cross-examination and that the prosecution did not wish to produce any other witnesses. That the trial was now at the stage of Section-313 of Cr.P.C. It is for the petitioners now to have the trial expedited. There is no merit in this application. The same is rejected. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )