1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WP No. 4913 of 2010 Premdas and ors v. State of Maharashtra and ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr D.N. Dani, Adv for petitioners Mr N.W. Sambre, GP for respdts 1 to 3 Coram: B. P. Dharmadhikari & A. P. Bhangale, JJ Dated: 30th September 2011 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Government Pleader for respondents no. 1 to 3. 2. We have perused 7/12 extract on which Mr Dani is placing reliance and also possession receipt on which Government Pleader is placing reliance. Revenue records show possession and cultivation of petitioners on 22.10.2007. Learned Government Pleader, however, is not accepting it and according to him, on 18.9.1993 possession was taken by the Government and as land was allotted to the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority, it was placed in its possession. Attention is invited to the fact that service of notice under Section 10 (5) of the ULC Act upon person in possession is not disputed before this Court. 3. Mr Dani is seeking leave to add MHADA as 2 party-respondent. He claims that under the Right to Information Act, petitioners had sought certain information and the MHADA is not in a position to demonstrate its possession. 4. As we find certain disputed questions arise in the matter, we are not concluding the issue and we are not recording any finding. Petition has been filed in the year 2010 and there are no interim orders operating in the matter. Hence, with liberty to petitioners to file appropriate proceedings before the appropriate Court for necessary reliefs, we dispose of the petition. Judge Judge joshi