IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13826 of 2008 SHYAM NANDAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 25.09.2008 Heard. The Department of Mines and the State are represented. The petitioner does not dispute that he did operate a brick kiln though he disputes the period for which he operated the same or his liability to the extent sought to be realized under the certificate proceedings. He submits that no notice under Section 7 was served on him but on coming to know of the proceedings, he suo motu filed his objection petition denying liability on or about 3.1.2008 which has not been considered and disposed of, yet warrants have been issued for his arrest. In my view, there is no point keeping the writ petition pending as petitioner now has adequate notice of the proceedings and has already filed his objection petition denying liability. I direct that he should appear in Certificate Case No. 147 of 2006-07 pending before Certificate Officer, Nalanda on the next date fixed when his objection petition would be decided after hearing him or his representative or his lawyer. Till such time, the objection petition is not disposed of, no coercive steps would be taken against the petitioner for enforcement of the certificate. This disposes of the writ application. Shageer (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J)