HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS?ARH AT ELASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAIW HGN BLE SHRI RAJEEV‘ GUPTA C J ~ ‘ HON BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR J Misc. Appeal Na 4? of 2006 Appeiiants . Smt. Kachfa Bai, W/o Late Tihéruram, aged about 27 years Minor Jarklshan S/o Late Tlharuram aged about 09 years Wnor Sonmat: D/o Late Tiharuram , aged about O6 years Minor Ram}! Sfo Late Tlharuram aed about 03 years Mmor Appellant No. 2 to 4 are represented by their Naturai Guardian & Mather Smt Kachra Bar Wd/o Late Tiharuram Appellant No 1 All by caste Satnamr All R/o Village Doukljor P O Gatadm Police Chowkl KOSIr Thana & TehStl Sal angarh District Ratgarh (C G.) VERSUS Laxman S/o Late Hasatram aged about 60 years Caste Satnami RI Village Deukuor PO Gatadxh Police Chowkl Kesir, Thana & Tahsil Sarangarh District Raigarh (CG) (Owner of the Vehlcte Tractor beanna regd No CG 13—A/1657) The New India lnsurance Cempan Limited Branch Office Sattlgud: Chowk Ratgar (insurer 0f the Vehicle Tractor bearing egal No CG 13—Al165?) Respandents Miscellaneous Appeal under 3 \ 1 Claimants g y h r ecticn 173 (2f m l Motor Veificles kct PreSent : Shri Satyendfa Sahu and Shri Suf'resh Tandon, counse! for the appel!ants. None for respondent No.1 Shri Shailendra Shame, counsei for respondent No.2. ORDER (23rd March, 2011) of the Court was passed by The foflowing order Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Learned counse! for the appeilants seek. permission fo' withdraw the appea! filed by; the appellants/claimants for enhancement of the compensation;awarded by the Motor Aoceni Cfaims Tribunaf, 'Raigarh vide'award dated 10.08.2005 passed én cfafm case No.26/2004. \r 2) 3) r Permissfon granied. The appeal, therefore! is dismissed as withdrawn. ueeN J¢k1 e @ . id J X Sd/. i ’ Sd/— Chief Justice \ ' . Rangnath Chandrakar ' “ i " Judge