IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1257 of 2001 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.K.TRIVEDI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- MAYUR CHANDULAL SHAH THRO' P.O.A. BHARATBHAI A SHAH Versus BHULABHAI RAVJIBHAI DHODHIYA (PATEL) -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Civil Revision Application No. 1257 of 2001 MR BP MUNSHI for Petitioner No. 1 MR JITENDRA M PATEL for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE D.K.TRIVEDI Date of decision: 20/03/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr.Munshi,learned advocate appearing for the petitioner - original defendant, seeks permission to withdraw this Revision Application with a liberty to the petitioner to move the trial court in view of the order passed by the Division Bench while deciding Letters Patent Appeal No.23/2002 on 22.1.2002. Mr. Patel appearing on behalf of the respondent states that his client intends to challenge the order of the Division Bench before the Apex court. However, permission to withdraw this Revision Application is granted and the same stands dismissed as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Interim relief granted earlier stands vacated. If and when such application is filed before the trial Court by the petitioner, the trial court is required to decide the same in accordance with law. (D.K.Trivedi,J) arg