Crl.M.No.M-27285 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-27285 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:September 20, 2010 Rupinder Singh .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.R.K.Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.48673 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-27285 of 2010 The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in cross case, i.e., DDR No.38, dated 30.6.2010, under Sections 307, 148, 149 IPC, and Sections 25/54/59 of the Arms Act, in FIR No.114, dated 29.6.2010, registered at Police Station Guru Harsahai, District Ferozepur. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully, including the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ferozepur, vide which application filed on behalf of the present petitioner for anticipatory bail was dismissed. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that it is a case of version and cross version and that fire arm injuries were also received on the side of the petitioner and rather the main FIR was registered on the basis of the statement of the petitioner. It is a matter of evidence as to which party was aggressor. However, allegations against the petitioner-accused are that he was armed with gun and fire arm injury was inflicted by him to Gurmail Singh @ Crl.M.No.M-27285 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Gagandeep Singh. Hence, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused. Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Rupinder Singh for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 20.9.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge