: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL REVN. APPLICATION NO.443 OF 2004 M/s. Joline Wine Mart & Anr. .. ..Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. ..Respondents None for applicants Mr.R.Y.Mirza, APP for State CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 1ST DECEMBER, 2006 P.C.: 1. From a perusal of the Rozanama, it appears that applicants are not interested in prosecuting this revision application. Notice was issued by this Court on 22nd March 2006 to the Respondents. Prior to that the applicants and their advocate were absent. After 22nd March 2006 applicants took their own time to supply spare copies to the office for service. A conditional order was passed by this Court on 5th April 2006. Thereafter on 5th June 2006 once again a conditional order was passed. The Respondent no.2 original complainant has been served. Appearance has been filed on behalf of Respondent no.2. The learned APP is representing for Respondent no.1. : 2 : 2. However, the applicants and their advocate are absent, the criminal revision application is pending since 2004, this court has therefore no alternate but to dismiss the criminal revision application for want of prosecution. It is accordingly dismissed. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.)