IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. 533 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.04.2011 Bakhshish Singh ...Appellant Versus Amarjit Singh and others ... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Satbir Rathore, Advocate, for the appellant. ..... RAJESH BINDAL, J. Challenge in the present appeal is to the order dated 23.02.2010 passed by the Election Tribunal, Dasuya (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) wherein election petition filed by the appellant challenging the election of respondent No.1 as member of the Panchayat Samiti Zone VI, Hazipur was dismissed. The primary contention raised by the learned counsel for the appellant is that during the counting of votes, respondent No.1, who belongs to Congress party had secured 1080 votes and the appellant, who belongs to Shiromani Akali Dal had secured 1193 votes. He was leading by 113 votes but still he was not declared a winning candidate. Learned counsel for the appellant could not refer to anything on record as to from where the table regarding the counting of votes as produced in election petition, has been prepared. The Tribunal in its order has recorded a specific finding that the appellant in the present case had secured 1119 votes whereas respondent No.1 had secured 1168 votes. The figure was tallied with Form No.19 and result sheet. It has further been recorded in the order that no irregularity was committed by the Returning Officer. Considering the aforesaid facts, I do not find any merit in the present appeal. Dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 28.4.2011 Rajan