IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15176 of 2009 SHANKAR PRASAD, SON OF LATE OM PRAKASH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MEERACHAK ARRAH, P.S. TOWN, DISTRICT BHOJPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ARRAH MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ARRAH. ----------- 02. 11.11.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State as also the respondent – Corporation. The grievance of the petitioner is that although the payment for sum of Rs. 50,242/- on account of gratuity was sanctioned, as per Memo No. 2738 dated 17.08.2002 (Annexure-1) and another vide memo No. 2986 dated 14.08.2008 (Annexure-2), but the same has not been paid till date. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the respondent – Corporation submits that if the aforesaid amount as contained in Annexure-1 and 2 referred to the above is not paid till date, the same shall be paid within a period of three months with statutory interest on receipt/production of certified copy of the present order. It goes without saying that while making the aforesaid payment if the respondent no. 3 finds that other dues still required to be paid, the same shall be paid without further delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)