;t-^ ••' ;^.<-?F "'i.^'^-^•^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 4. MGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER RESPONDENTS WMTPETmONfS) Ito. 3830 of2008- a S.B.Ram S/o Shri Hari Nath Raia, aged dwut 53 yeais, preseHtly vwMka^ as Sub-Da^isi<wal;C^i!ar, Agicutture, Surajpur, Distt. Swguja(iChhattisgadi) VERSUS •--.::,; •:::^':,;''71;"r" ,:* ;' : 1. State of Chhirtti^afh, throu^i ttee &CTetary, Depariment ofAgiiculture.B.K.S.^tt^FfeBaipiir. 2. Dy. SeeretMy, D^artmeat of Agrieiritinie, Govemment of aihattis^ufc, D-K.S. 'Bhscwaa, Ratpur. a - 3. Mahadeo MMikar, S/o Not kno^gn to"tbe pstitijjiner, Posted as Sub-Diviskaial ^OfBcer, AgiButture, Baloda Bazar, Distt; Ratpur^hhattisgail%, . WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE SB: Hmn'Ue Shri SatfshK. Aenifautafa.I. Present: Ms. Shamiila Sin^iai, Advoeate for Ifae petitiotafiK < s; . Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy AdvQcateGenetaljBaAftSfert&' respondent No. I and 2. , ••-i.'» .•• ' ORALOKDBR1! -<- - ?• --,--.,•. ,:-1.-..,, (Passed on22na ^ay<rf3uly,2Q(^t Withthe consent rfleamed counselapp®ringfM'1heparties,'lfaeinattaTistakfln up fiw hearit finally. ' ^ Leamed counsel sq>pearing for the petitioner subnuts that fhe petitionwdo^ not want to press tiris petition on merits at this stage. HQWever, fke respandeiA- authorities may be directed to consider and deckle Ihe pMKSng''rapFeseBtati<Mi dated 7.7.2008 (Amiexure P/6), in accordance with law, as wcpeditiously as possible. ' • •" : 1": - ; ;l-"i-: i;- Shri Thakur, leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondaits gulwBttts that there is no reason as to why the representation ofthe petitioner as stated above diould not be considered expeditiously. Shri Thakur submits fliat tiie above-stated representati(®dhall be considCTed aiKl decided by the coneemed autfaority, in accordance with law, on its own ments, within a period oftwo weeks fiwmthe date ofreceipl ofa ecpy oftBris arder. ——- r Andt Shri Thakur fiirther submits that ne eoercive Sieps shall be tAen till ti»diqxxsal rflfae representatiwi. 5. In view ofthe clear statement made by the leamed cnrasel qxpearing fw the State/respoadeirt No. 1 and 2, tfus petitionaccordingly staadsdisposed of No order asto costs. satisbK.^~- ^8ajjtotri ige