// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4520/2008 Shiv Lal S/o Shri Rameshwar Lal and Others Versus The civil Judge (Jr.Div.), Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu and Another Date of Order ::: 06.08.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Sunil Kumar Singodiya, Counsel for petitioners Shri Sandeep Garssa, Counsel for respondent No.2 #### By the Court:- Admit. Shri Sandeep Garssa, Advocate, appears for the respondent No.2. Service of respondent No.1 is dispensed with. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition, on behalf of the defendants, is directed against the impugned order dated 11th April, 2008, whereby their application under Order 16 Rule 6 CPC to summon the Register of Notary Public dated 13th September, 1991, has been rejected. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and examined the impugned order passed by the trial court. The trial court has already observed // 2 // that as and when the case is fixed for defendant's evidence, it will be open for the defendants to summon the Notary Public Shri Sher Singh along-with his Register. The applicants have not shown any cogent reason for summon of the said Register at this stage. The trial court has observed that the application under Order 16 Rule 6 CPC at this stage is not maintainable. In view of the above, it is clear that the right of the petitioners has already been saved by the trial court. I do not find any illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error in the said order so as to interfere with the same. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//