AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.804 OF 2006 Mr. Ramesh Parekh & Ors. .... Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Mr. P.R. Dave for the petitioners. Ms. M.M. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for the State. Mr. Rajendra Sorankar for the original complainant. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & Dr. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ. DATED : 10TH JULY, 2008. P.C.:- 1. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners who are original accused 2 and 3 respectively in C.R. No.91 of 2004 [153/2003 of Wadala Trunk Terminal Police Station] have prayed for quashing of the same. The petitioners have been charged under section 406 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, (for short, “the IPC”). 2. From the affidavit of Sambhaji Korade P.I. Attached to Kurla AJN 2 Railway Police Station, it appears that during investigation offences under sections 464, 467, 468, 420, 471 read with section 34 of the IPC were disclosed and accordingly charge-sheet has been filed against the accused in the 37th Metropolitan Magistrate's Court, Esplanade, Mumbai. 3. We have heard, at some length, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. appearing for the State and learned counsel appearing for the original complainant. 4. Having perused the complaint, we are of the opinion that it cannot be said that the complaint does not disclose any offence at all. Besides, charge-sheet is already filed. In the circumstances, we are unable to quash the complaint. However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. All contentions of both sides are kept open. The petition is disposed of. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.]