1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 544 OF 2009 Shri Anil Prabhakar Sinkar. ..Petitioner. V/s. State of Maharashtgra & ors. ..Respondents. Mr.V.P.Patil for Petitioner. Mr.D.A.Nalawade, Govt.Pleader with Mr.R.J.Mane, AGP for State. Mr.V.M.Parshurami for Respondent Nos. 4 & 5. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 3, 2010. P.C. 1. Petitioner was an occupant in erstwhile premises which has been reconstructed by MHADA, wherein the Petitioner was allotted premises as per his entitlement. Grievance of the Petitioner is that one more room in the premises were to be allotted to the Petitioner and in respect of which no decision has been taken by MHADA so far. 2 2. On behalf of MHADA, Learned Counsel states that room has been allotted to Respondent No.6. 3. Considering the above statement, this is not fit case of exercising extraordinary jurisdiction for this remedy. If Petitioner has any other grievance, he may pursue other remedy, as may be permissible. Petition disposed of on the above terms. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)