IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-35942 of 2011. Date of decision: December 02, 2011. Lekh Raj .. Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI PRESENT Mr.Satish Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner. M.M.S.BEDI, J (ORAL). The petitioner is an accused in a case registered at the instance of Gullay alleging that the petitioner along with others had fired at complainant and others. A cross-version has also been recorded at the instance of the petitioner under Section 326 IPC. Counsel for the petitioner has contended that though the cross-version has been recorded under Section 324 IPC, but it warrants addition of offence under Section 307 IPC. The petitioner has also submitted a representation to the Director General of Police, Haryana, vide Annexure P-2. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not see any good ground for exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C., and to interfere in the investigation in the cross-version case. The petitioner has got an alternative remedy of filing complaint against the opposite party in case the cross-version is not fairly investigated by the prosecution agency. Disposed of with above said liberty to the petitioner. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE December 02, 2011. rka . .