.digle Beach ‘lN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAsPUR (c.G.) a! Cr. M. P. NO. : I 2011 APPLICANT : Murari Prasad Awasthi, son of Late ACCUSED Shri Kumbhaj Prasad Awasthi, aged about 26 years, resident of village Bhardakala,‘ Tehsil and District Durg, Chhattisgarh VERSUS RESPONDENT State of Chhattisgarh through PROSECUTION Police Station Dongergaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh Case No. Crime No. 51/2008r Police Station Crirrgimal‘Case No. 49/2010 Donggrgaon Police Station District Rajgandgaon Section 39§ of the lndian Penal Code Offence APPLlCATlON UNDER SECTION 48? OF THE CODE OF CRlMlNAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS AND DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS .....» . l— » HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Sinqle Bench: Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. Cr.M.P.No.477I2011 Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Present:- Shri Amrito Das, counsel for the applicant. Shri Rakesh Jha, Deputy Government Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 09-08-2011) This petition has been filed by the applicant aggrieved on account of non- supply of certain documents filed by the prosecution along with the charge sheet. 2. The facts and grounds raised by the applicant in this petition are identical to the facts and grounds raised in Cr.M.P.No.444 & 445 of 2011, disposed off by this Court vide its order dated 01-08—201 1. 3. Therefore, on the considerations made and reasons stated in order dated 01—08-2011 passed by this Court in identical petitions i.e. Cr.M.P.No.444 & 445 of 201 1, it is held that the applicant is entitled to legible copies of all the documents, which were demanded by him; vide his application dated 28-08-2008. The applicant have been supplied some of the legible copies of documents on 14-10- 2008 and remaining legible copies of the documents have not been supplied. The Magistrate or the Sessions Judge, as the case may be, shall further examine the prayer of the applicant for supply of legible copies of the documents, which have not been supplied so far, and appropriate and specific directions shall be issued to the prosecution to supply the documents to the applicant. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the petition is finally disposed off. /"k v/I/ Sdl- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge Applicant Murari Prasad Awasthi Accused Versus Respondent State of Chhattisgarh Prosecution