IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.42698 of 2009 ***** Pankaj Sao, Son of Krishna Sao, resident of village- Piplawan, P.S. Naubatpur, District-Patna. …. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar …. …. Opposite party ----------- 3. 17.12.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner is named as one of the persons as an accused in Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 145/09 for the offences under Section 366(A) read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission of the counsel is that the victim girl is supposed to have got married with one Mithilesh Kumar and this petitioner is supposed to have played some role in so-called abduction and marriage, as per the F.I.R., but from the averments and the evidence except for initial logistics nothing much seems to have been done by the petitioner. Keeping in view the period petitioner has spent in custody, let the petitioner, namely, Pankaj Sao, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties in the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Danapur in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 145/2009. One of the sureties will be executed by the father and the other by a close relation. Petitioner will cooperate in trial. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)