1 criapl-250.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.250 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and the Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Coram: A. H. Joshi and A. R. Joshi, JJ. Date : August 17, 2011 Shri V.D. Godbharle, A.P.P. for applicant-State. --------- 1. Heard the learned A.P.P. for the applicant. 2. It is seen that two eye witnesses, who state in echo and have supported the prosecution, were rendered untrue on account of the report lodged by real elder brother of deceased Manohar on which the police had registered A.D. No. 67 of 2005. 2 criapl-250.11 3. The report contained the version that the deceased fell in the well. The prosecution has failed to explain the circumstances in which the said A.D. was registered and, therefore, the version of witnesses, as witnesses of the incident, came in doubt. 4. In these circumstances, it would be impossible to arrive at any other conclusion than drawn by the learned Sessions Judge. 5. We are, therefore, satisfied that the appeal does not deserve any indulgence. Hence, application seeking leave to file appeal is rejected. (A. R. JOSHI, J.) ( A. H. JOSHI, J.) pnd/criap-250.11