IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M- 2044 of 2011 Date of decision:-21.1.2011 Rahul Khanna ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Vikram Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) After arguing for some time learned counsel for the petitioner requests that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition to enable him to raise all these pleas before the trial Court. He is allowed to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. However, petitioner will appear before the trial Court and furnish bail bonds. Thereafter, personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court will be exempted subject to the following conditions:- (i) petitioner shall be represented through counsel; (ii) shall not delay/stall the trial proceedings; (iii) shall not dispute his identity as an accused: (iv) shall have no objection if the prosecution evidence is recorded in his absence but in the presence of his counsel; (v) shall appear before the trial Court as and when required by the trial Court; and (vi) any other condition which the learned trial Court may impose. January 21, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Vijay Asija JUDGE