IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-19805 of 2008 Date of Decision: August 07, 2008 Ranjeet Kaur & Another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Avtar Singh Khinda, Advocate, for the petitioners. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) Contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners is that the petitioners are of legally marriageable age and therefore, got married as per their wishes, however, against the desire of respondent No.4, Sajjan Singh, who is father of petitioner No.1, Ranjeet Kaur. Apprehending danger, an application, Annexure P-5 had been made to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ropar, however, no action has been taken and the danger persists. The marriage certificate has been placed on record as Annexure P-3 and the certificates to indicate the age of the petitioners have been placed on record as Annexures P-1 and P-2. Crl. Misc. No. M-19805 of 2008 [2] Having regard to the nature of controversy, I direct the Station House Officer, Police Station, City, Anandpur Sahib, to treat a copy of this petition as an application. Enquiry be conducted and completed within 15 days. In case the apprehension of the petitioners is found reasonable, appropriate directions be issued so as to ensure the protection of life and liberty of the petitioners. The petition is disposed of. (AJAI LAMBA) August 07, 2008 JUDGE avin