^C^ v^zr^— ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH GOURT OF CHHATTISGARH ,^To.BSSt......./10) SIN8LE B£N8H ^' PETITIONER ' : Jamuna Bai, W/o. Shri Sahasram Baghamare, Aged about - 48 year, R/o. - Village - Aurada, Tahsil - Kharasiya, Distt. - Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENDS / ...^s^ p.v- \f\^v' c\[^^9^~ A^.^JS^ '^•^.^^f^ ^'^./"^*'"' "%^^ >i;i£;jy<^. 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Home Department D. K. S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2.^ The Additional Inspector Genera! of Police^ Chhattisgarh Security Force, Raipur, District - Ralpur (C.G.) 3. The Commandant, 08th Batalian (I/R.) Chhatfisgarh Security Force., Rajnandgaon District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 4.^ The Pension Officer Pension Office, Pension Bada Raipur 5« Sahasram Baghamare, S/o. ShivLal Baghamare^ Aged about " 60 year ^.z^ ftSil. C^^,^^,^^^ cl^n8^hau:u"Iul Fa;ca<t" District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDE8_ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner named above respectfull}/ begs to submit as under :- '^ ^sr ^RT ^jc^ WT 3H^T sb^Jcb ^ <nwiT%<<i<t» ^^r T^i'4i<n^, yTi1<-ili(o, f®i<ni<H^< ^^....tA£^.^......./'CT.//^200 ^V^f ^5pF (^f^3^?) ^RTTW ^rflTcT ^TT^T SB ilTun'bie Shri Maninara Moh 1g-Q8-2Q1Q Shri V.K.Pandey, counsei f^ Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Pan^ By this petition, the petitso^er No.5 has prayed for issuance of ^ and 2 to decide petiuoners applic^ Leamed counsei for the subrnitted appijcation before resp| name of the petitioner in the recor{ of respondent No.5. Learned c| respondent No.5 has jgnored to| "wedd^d ^tfe and has kept anoth^r )frw Court/drawn to the order dated Famiiy Court has passed an ordj eariler granted to the petitioner, vvi1 From the representotion plaj eariier rnade representation to v| benefits peid or payabie to respon| she is tr1e iegaiiy wedded wife. Ciairn of the petltioner ag^ beneflts or direction is not support^d the Chhattisgarh Civil Servlces ar| for the petitioner could not bring t^ the semce ruies appilcable to th{ retiral benefit to his ^vjfe, 'W£r{<n<ili'WT^if ^ feT^ 'rf^i^K ^3fRrH3?1^T ^n Snnvastava, J. [r thepetitioner. Lavvyer for the State. ', dajming to be the wife of respondent Ippropriate writ directing respondents No.1. Ition. ^etiuoner submits that the petltloner • has ^nuent No.2 on 8/2/2010 for entering the t-is relating to retirat dues including pension ^unsei for the petltioner submitted that 'maintain the petitionet- -who Is a legaliy woman whlch is iiiegal.. Attentlon of this 117/11/2007 (Annexure F71) by whjch the ^r of enhancing She .maintenance'-arnount |ich is payable by respondent No.5. ^ed on record, it is found that the petltjoner larious autnorities that half of'the retirai- |jent No.5 be directed to be paid to her, as Mnst her husband for share in the retiral ^d by any statutory provisions contained in |d Pension Ruies, 1976- Learned counsei ^ the notice oftnis Courtany.provisions in ^ respondent No.,5 obiige nlm to share m ^IT^ZT, ^-IWSra —-FS/147—2/2019 —I ,00,000. T ^^m^ ^ -^'^. 'i /y^:.. :s •.^•yy' '.' ^^:1 ^^- ^n^T^T'f^w WT3>TI^TsFRN? ^ V--'' /^o *11*1^1T »*15C8» ^^T^i^Ki^ ^Til<H4}<o, fa<nj^^< —......^fi.^..^o..-../it@//u ef*»*«e»»f««\»»«y»»«»««TX*« •»•»••••••••••/•••••<^200 ^^t xf^^ (lcl^q<^) ITRHW^ft^ ^TI^Y --?- in so far as petiuoner's ci^ seivlce of respondent No.5 perta| no such directjon can be give?i| misconceived. Upon retirement, a Goverrl pensionary benefits. if the petitic| open for the peuuoner to take rec| to her under the iaw. Wlth the aforesaid observal 'Wrf^fN "RFT^f"? fe(^ <^l^l< ^stfm^^n^r im for entering her name in the records of ning .to his pension and other retiral dues, by this Court and such clairn is totaliy iment Servant is entltled to receive ali the ner asserts any such beneflt, it would be ourse to such remedy as may be avaliable ,jons, the petitlon is dlsmissed. Sd/- Manmdra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^n^r^N^^rT^^ic^wiR—FS/147—2/2010—1,00,000.