CR No.2668 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2668 of 2010 Date of decision : 10-09-2010 Tilak .... Petitioner VERSUS Pawan Kumar and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Harsh Bunger, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Singla, Advocate, for the respondents. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that if the interrogatories are answered in the right earnest, he will not press his prayer to lead any evidence. Counsel for the respondents has contended that pendency of the present petition is to the benefit of the tenant, who is enjoying possession of the demised premises. He states that without joining any issue to facilitate early culmination of the eviction proceedings, respondent-landlord is ready and willing to answer the interrogatories put forward by the tenant in the application under Order 11 Rule 1 and 4 read with Section 151 CPC. This fair stand taken by counsel for the respondents has disarmed the petitioner-tenant. Accordingly, impugned order dated 03.03.2010 (Annexure P-6) is set aside whereby order dated 29.03.2010 (Annexure P-9) is upheld. It is stated that next date of hearing fixed before the Rent CR No.2668 of 2010 -2- Controller is for addressing arguments. Before the next date of hearing, respondents shall answer interrogatories specified in the application. Counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of this, he will not assail impugned order dated 29.03.2010 (Annexure P-9) and he will not lead any additional evidence. In view of the broad consensus arrived at between the parties, the present revision petition is disposed of. (KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA) 10-09-2010 JUDGE manju