IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 31309 of 2011(K) ------------------------------- ------ PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- B.MOHANLAL,S/O.BHASKARAN,AGED 59 YEARS, 'GOVINDA SADANAM', CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA SRI.K.I.SAGEER RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. CHERTHALA MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CHERTHALA P.O, ALAPUZHA DISTRICT PIN 688 524. 2. CHERTHALA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, OFFICE OF THE CHERTHALA MUNICIPALITY, CHERTHALA P.O, ALAPUZHA DISTRICT PIN 688 524. BY ADV. SMT.JOBY SYRIAC, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C)NO.31309/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE SELECTION NOTICE BEARING ORDER NO.PW-4452/200 DATED 30.09.2003 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. P2:- COPY OF THE NEWS ITEMS APPEARED IN THE DESHABHIMANI DAILY DATED 7.6.2010. P3:-COPY OF THE NEWS ITEMS APPEARED IN THE KERALA KAUMUDI DAILY DATED 4.6.2010. P4:-COPY OF THE NEWS ITEMS APPEARED IN THE MATHRUBHUMI DAILY DATED 5.6.2010. P5:- COPY OF THE NEWS ITEMS APPEARED IN THE MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY DATED 23.5.2010. P6:- COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.P.W1-4452/00 DATED 12.8.2010 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. P7:- COPY OF THE DETAILED PLAN OF PROJECT OF THE CHERTHALA MUNICIPALITY FOR THE YEAR 2011-12. P8:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 11.11.11 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE tss HARUN-UL-RASHID,J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 31309 OF 2011 ------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2011 JUDGMENT This writ petition is filed for a direction commanding the lst respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P8 representation forthwith and to quash Ext.P6 notice issued by the lst respondent. 2. When the matter is taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Ext.P8 representation is pending consideration before the lst respondent and requests this Court to direct the lst respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P8 within a time frame. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the Municipality. In the circumstances of the case, Ext.P6 is quashed. There will be a direction to the lst respondent to consider Ext.P8 representation and pass orders thereon, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. kcv.