(^p^&J jl?S/o^ N BEFeRE TOE M.P. S'EASE ABtaiSIS'EBA.TXVE SISBN&L. AT JAaALBta. • &.A*HO<T^-->S(° h995 AH't.IC&HT S RESPOHBEHTS: VISHW RAK CBAIBfiaHANSHI S/&» SStX Ea&0y BAK GHAffiBAWMSia AGEES 'ZEABS.-O/O. BEEeB'ErVE 8 RES@@RCES S V£»SAWEIESi mvtsms swessaA BISTT. sA3m BA . K/0. ABfeRSH KgQ .ffiMUBBIBl. V BR S N S 1. State'of M»PB Ite'Qtigh tbe Seeretary, Water Besoarces Desartitent, yailab& BHawaa, 2» Chief Engjtaeer, BafaanadU. 0©dawariKaehhar Vater Resoarees ©epar'tnaiit,RaipHr* ; 5« Sapertnteniaing. Eagtneer, ^ater B.espurces c, SSa3^itna-to Mandal, Bapg, 4< ExeoBittve &»gineer, Ifeter Beaourees Beparta^t, iEawardtea Bivislon» Kawenaiia, Dis-tt. Rajnaradgaon* Mwic^mf^ SECTOQS 19 ®F1»AS«I»IS1K&335I 'IRIBtJSAL ACT, 19^< EE'EAILS ©FTHE A3SI •-W;, .t»~'^ :—7i 'StAsea'" ,,c:f i'^ ^ y -S^ "?qpTRTq, eiiaiyie, i'qfliyy. ..fijfr..&)...././.2.s~/.a^- aftVi v.f y') 3ni?t 3f ft-iw Wn3TI^;%Tlt^ vsy Shri Amit Verma counsei foij the petitioner. Shri Pravin Das GA for the i^spondents/State. Case of the petitioner Is thdt he Vv'as appointed as Chowkidar on 7.5.1990 and continued onj the said post Silt issuance of terrnination order dated 4.8.1^95 and thereafter the other termination order dated 31.1 .20001 Counsel for the petitioner |ubmits that the first termination order dated 4.8.1995 was stayed |)y this Courton 5.9.1995 and on the strength of the said stay ord^r the petitioner continued on the said post ti!l passing of t'ne ^econd termination order dated 31.1.2000 v/hich v/as aiso stayed jater on by order dated 16.2.2000. Counsel for the petltioner furth^r submits that on 5.3.2008 the Goyernment has issued a circuiarl and taRen a decision to consider fhe cases ofthe persons who wer^ appointed priorto year 1998 and aiso Qf those who are v/orking for jast 10 years. In vie'w of the subsequent c|eveiopments and issuance of the eirculsr dated 5.3.2008, at this jstage counse! for the petitloner submits that he may be permitt|d to withdravv this petition with !iberty.to make a representatioi^i to the concerned respon-dents seeking reguiarization ofservice. (Je aiso prays for a direction to the 1 concemed respondents to considfer the case ofthe petifioner in the wn ftia^lFqN; § ^T- ^s; -<4i<<i<n<4, Btil'H'ilS, fsjoiy^< ^-....L^.£.C.&.i..l.C^~l.o± Sfl^t ''RT (l^t-i«t^) Wiwgteisis^i <toW!i-1<il-( 1?[tRff'iE 1yA •^•sRma^ circuiars issue iit may also be r. To thls pra^ •^^t s.iU light of the iega! positlon and (he various Government. He submits that sbme time limi ieclding the representation of pe petitic counsel for the petitioner, coun^ei for the respondents/State has no objection. Accordingly, the petitiorl Is dismissed as withdrawn Vv'ith liberty as aforesaid. if the petitijsner makes a representation to the concerned respondents within ojne month from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the conce('ned respondents are expected to declde the same within a furth^r period of three months from the date of its receipt strictly in acco|'dance with !av»'. This Court has not expre^sed any opinion on the merits ofthe •ities ccticerned are free to decide the representation of the petltioner ^trictly in accordance wlth lav/ taking info consideration the circuisr^ and the guidelines m respect of reguiarization of government er^ployees. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge ••^^^si^i ?is3!i^r: ?—FS/95—11 /2008—1.00,0(M). ^.