1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5991 OF 2007 (Padmakar Mansaramji Singanjude vs. State and others) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 29, 2008 Heard Shri Parchure, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Shri Jichkar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent nos. 1 and 2, and Shri Pavan Raulkar, learned Counsel for the respondent no.3. Shri Parchure, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that in view of statement made by the respondent no.3 in its affidavit-in-reply dated 26.6.2002, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed and petition can be disposed of in terms of averments made by the respondent no.3 in para (2) of the said 2 affidavit. It is further submitted that if such proposal is forwarded to the respondent no.2, the respondent no.2 may be directed to decide the same according to law. Shri Pavan Raulkar, learned Counsel for the respondent no.3, is also agreeable for disposal of the petition in terms of averments made in para (2) of the affidavit-in-reply. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, the petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2 that if proposal is forwarded by the Management for approval to the appointment of the petitioner as a regular Head Master, same shall be considered according to law and procedure applicable in this regard within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such proposal. JUDGE JUDGE khj