IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 2ND JANUARY 2009 / 12TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 37023 of 2008(G) PETITIONER: --------------- DR. ANIAMMA MATHEW PUTHUPARAMBIL, PARAYANCHALIL HOUSE, AMALAGIRI.P.O, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THENJIPALAM.P.O. 2. DR.C. JAYAN, PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENJIPALAM.P.O. ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, STANDING COUNSEL FOR UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) NO. 37023 OF 2008 G ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 2nd January, 2009 JUDGMENT The challenge in this Writ Petition is against Ext.P4 memo issued by the University, by which the application submitted by the petitioner for the post of Professor of Psychology was rejected. One of the prayers in the Writ Petition is to direct the University to conduct a proper selection after including the petitioner. The Standing Counsel for the University submitted that the interview was over on 16.12.2008. Practically, the Writ Petition has become infructuous. It is also pointed out by the Standing Counsel appearing for the University that in a similar case where the application was rejected on one of the grounds mentioned in Ext.P4, W.P.(C) No.36943 of 2008 was filed by another candidate and that was dismissed by this Court. In the facts and circumstances, the Writ Petition is closed as infructuous. This will not preclude the petitioner from putting forward the contentions now raised in the Writ Petition, in a properly constituted Writ Petition for appropriate reliefs. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/