IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH JANUARY 2010 / 30TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 37680 of 2009(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. P.HAMZA,PUNNAKKADAN HOUSE,PANDIKADU, NELLIKKUTTU.PO,MANJERI,MALAPP URAM DISTRICT. 2. U.P.UMMER, ULLATTUPARA HOUSE, PATTIKKAD,PERINTHALMANNA, MANJERI. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY,PALAKKAD REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER,PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY,PALAKKAD. 3. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVT.,SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON FOR R1 SRI.JIBU P THOMAS FOR R1 SRI.P.S.APPU FOR R1 SRI.C.A.ANOOP FOR R1 MS.K.R.DEEPA, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.37680 of 2009 (D) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 20th day of January, 2010 J U D G M E N T Challenge in the writ petition is against Ext.P2 order, by which Ext.P1 application made by the petitioners for building permit has been rejected for the reason that the area is included in the DTP scheme as paddy filed. It is now brought to my notice that pursuant to the representation made by the Municipality itself, the DTP Scheme itself has been modified. Since the Scheme has been modified as above, the petitioners are entitled to have their application reconsidered in the light of the modified Scheme. In order to enable the Municipality to reconsider Ext.P1 application as above, I quash Ext.P2 and direct the Municipality to reconsider the matter as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg