IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 413 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 02/01/2007 in WP NO : 25331 OF 2006 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Padala Veera Venkata Satyanarayana Reddy, S/o.Late P.S.N.Reddy of Sri Devi Constructions R/o.D.No.4-61/1/1 Lawsons Bay Colony Visakhapatnam ..... APPELLANT AND 1 M.V.S Rai S/o.Late Sri M.S.R Murthy D.No.Bi 49-28-5 Madhura Nagar Visakhapatnam Dist 2 Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation Visakhapatnam, Visakhpatnam district, rep. by its Commissioner .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.P.VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.V.SESHA SAI The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per Anil R. Dave, CJ) Heard the learned Advocates. There is consensus among the Advocates to the effect that at the time of considering the application for building permission, which has been made by respondent No.1 to respondent No.2, the case of the present appellant-original respondent No.2 shall also be considered. In other words, at the time of considering the application for building permission, which has been made by the writ petitioner, respondent No.2- authority shall also consider the case of the present appellant. In view of the above understanding, the appeal is disposed of with no order as to costs. Accordingly, a direction is given to respondent No.2 to consider the case of the appellant as well as respondent No.1 before taking final decision on the application for building permission. _____________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ _________________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J GRR To 1. 2.2 CD copies