C.W.P. No. 23724 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 23724 of 2011 Date of Decision:- 20.12.2011 Krishan Lal and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present:- Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. **** SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J(Oral). The petitioners, who are residents of Village Sutana, Tehsil and District Panipat, have filed the instant writ petition under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing direction to respondents No. 1 and 2 to take action against respondent No. 3 for allotting 100 square yards plot to the ineligible persons. In the petition, it has been stated that the State Government issued a policy on 1.2.2008 for allotment of residential plot for 100 square yards to the persons belonging to Scheduled Castes category and the persons living below poverty line. It is the case of the petitioners that the said policy prescribed the conditions for allotment of plot to these categories. However, in gross violation of those conditions the Gram Panchayat, Village Sultana, has allotted the plot to ineligible persons. The petitioners have annexed the list of those ineligible persons with this petition. It is the case of the petitioners that in this regard the petitioners C.W.P. No. 23724 of 2011 2 have submitted a detailed representation dated 16.8.2011 along with the documents to the Deputy Commissioner, Panipat but till date the said representation has not been looked into and considered by him inspite of reminders given by the petitioners on 16.11.2011, copy of which has been annexed as Annexure P-8. Notice of motion. Mr. Ajay Kumar Gupta, Addl. AG Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and in view of the facts mentioned in the present writ petition, we dispose of this writ petition with direction to the Deputy Commissioner, to consider and decide the representation dated 16.8.2011 filed by the petitioners by holding an inquiry and by passing a speaking order. In case, the Deputy Commissioner, wants to take any adverse action against any of the allottee, he/they should be provided an opportunity of hearing before ordering cancellation of his/their allotment of plot. Disposed of in the aforesaid terms. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE 20.12.2011 ( MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR ) reema JUDGE