IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 2873 of 2009 Between: G.Satyanarayana S/o.Sri Ramulu H.No.6-2-33, Satrampadu RTC colony Eluru, West Godavari District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Life Insurance Corporation of India, 681,Branch Eluru, West Godavari District, rep.by its Chief Manager 2 The Life Insurance Corporaiton of India., Divisional Office Morampudi Junction, Rajahmundry, E.G.District Rep.by its Senior Divisional Manager .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Resondent Authorities in paying Renewal Commission to the petitioner (LIC Agent Code No.3300) as illegal, arbitrry, unconstitutional violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India consequently direct the respondent authorities to pay Renewal Commission to the petitioner immediately and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.J.SREENIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.BATHULA RAJ KIRAN The Court made the following : O R D E R:- The case of the petitioner is that he joined as Agent in Life Insurance Corporation of India, under the control of the Development Officer on 24.2.1999, and worked as such for two years. While so, on 7.11.2007, he resigned from service under intimation to the 1st respondent-Corporation, for better prospects in Reliance Life Insurance Company. Then the 1st respondent issued a letter to the petitioner indicating termination of his agency and forfeiture or renewal commission with effect from the date of his joining the Company i.e. on 14.11.2007 without assigning any reasons, and the petitioner made a representation to the 1st respondent requesting it to pay renewal commission on par with other agents, who, according to the petitioner, were paid even after their resignation, but it is his grievance that the 1st respondent has neither paid the renewal commission nor passed any orders on his representation. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for Life Insurance Corporation of India. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel has produced a copy of the letter 13.3.2009 addressed to the petitioner, indicating payment of entire amount due to the petitioner and an endorsement is made by the petitioner on the letter to the effect that he received the payment by way of cheque. In view of the payment made by the respondents-Corporation to the petitioner, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition and the same is accordingly closed. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 20th March, 2009 bcj