IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI TUESDAY, THE 5TH OCTOBER 2010 / 13TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 26923 of 2010(M) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- A.KHALID, BISMILLA HOUSE, BHOOTHAKULAM, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.STALIN PETER DAVIS RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM-691001. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLAM-691001. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLAM-691001. 4. K.SURESH KUMAR, SECRETARY, PUNALUR MEKHALA PRIVATE BUS WORKERS UNION-690536. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD R4 BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.26923 OF 2010-M PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1.TRUE COPY DETAILS OF THE PERMIT OF THE PETITIONER ON THE ROUTE KOTTIYAM-ANCHAL MARKET JN. IN RESPECT OF VEHICLE KL-2/AC 4748 DATED 8.6.2010. EXT.P2. TRUE COPY OF THE BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT LETTER SHOWING 3 NAMES WHO ARE NOT THE PETITIONERS WORKERS AND FROM THE LETTER IT CAN SEE THAT NO DATE AND RECENTLY REGISTERED AND FOR DIFFERENT MOTIVE. EXT.P3.THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PETITIONER VEHICLE WHICH WAS ILLEGALLY DETAINED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT ON 22.8.2010 BEFORE ONAM DAY. EXT.P4.TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT AS PER THE DIRECTION OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 23.8.2010. K.M.JOSEPH & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.26923 of 2010-M ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 5th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. The prayer in the writ petition is as follows: “to issue a writ of mandamus or order directing the respondents 1 to 3 to afford necessary adequate police protection to the life of the petitioner, the crew members and also to the vehicle KL-2/Ac 4748 and to conduct the service.” 2. We take note of the submission of the learned counsel for the party respondent which we have recorded by order dated 6.9.2010 that the party respondent have no intention to obstruct the operation of the petitioner. We also take note of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner will co-operate with the conciliation proceedings. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.C.HARI RANI) JUDGE. MS