IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 25TH BHADRA 1931 WP(C).No. 26015 of 2009(V) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. ANJOE C JOHN,SON OF C.D.JOHN, CHIRAYATH KONNIKKARA HOUSE,P.R.PADI, POST THAIKKATTUSSERY,THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. MILTEN JOSE,SON OF JOSE, PLAKKAL HOUSE,VILLAGE OFFICE ROAD, P.O.CHIYYARAM,THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. ANITHA MATHEW,D/O.MATHEW K.VARGHESE, KOYIPURATHU HOUSE,PURAMATTOM P.O.,THIRUVALLA. 4. LAKSHMI R., VALIYAVEETIL HOUSE,PERUMPNACHERRY POST, CHANGANACHERRY,KOTTAYAM. 5. ARUN VIJAYAN, VYAKKUZHA THEKKETHIL HOUSE, CHELLARKOVIL,MILADUMPARA,IDUKKI. 6. JERIN JOSEPH, THANASSERY PUTHENVEEDU,VAZHAMUTTOM POST, OMALLOOR,PATHANAMTHITTA. 7. ALIMSHA BASHEER, THOUFEEQ MANZIL,PARATHODU POST,KOTTAYAM. 8. NIRMAL PRABHAD NAIR, SREEVALSOM HOUSE,CHETHAKKAL POST, RANNI,PATHANAMTHITTA. 9. ARUN C MOHAN, CHURANOLIL HOUSE,KORUTHODE POST, KANJIRAPPILLY,KOTTAYAM. Kss ..2/- ...2..... WPC.NO.26015/2009 V 10. ASHISH K.NAIR, KUTTENTETHU,ERAMELLIKKARA POST, VANAVTHUKARA,CHENGANNUR. 11. VIJEESH V., NIKARTHIL HOUSE,NORTH ARYADU POST,ALAPUZHA. 12. JIBU JACOB IYPE, MUNDAPPALLIL HOUSE,ANGADICAL, PUTHENKAVU POST,CHENGANNUR,ALEPPEY. BY ADVS. MR.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR), MR.P.BHASKARAN. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,KOTTAYAM. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,KOTTAYAM. R1 & R2 BY ADV. MR. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G.UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/09/2009 ALONG WITH WPC.NO.26052 OF 2009 AND WPC. NO.26108 OF 2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NOs. 26015, 26052 & 26108 OF 2009 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioners in these matters seek direction for consideration of their requests for revaluation of answer scripts. Taking into consideration the situations pointed out in these writ petitions, I am satisfied that the petitioners have demonstrated exigency of circumstances for emergent consideration of the applications for revaluation. In the result, these writ petitions are ordered directing that the applications of the petitioners for revaluation, if in order, will be taken up and results issued, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE lgk/17/9