IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-31167 of 2009 Date of Decision: February 08, 2010 Vijay Masih .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.103 dated 8.10.2009 under Sections 379, 411 IPC registered with Police Station, Kahnuwan, District Gurdaspur. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in deference to Order dated 18.11.2009, the petitioner has joined investigation. Learned counsel for the respondent- Crl. Misc. No. M-31167 of 2009 [2] State, on instructions from Ameul Mal, Head Constable, states that indeed the petitioner has joined investigation and is not required for further interrogation. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. Order dated 18.11.2009 is made absolute and it is directed that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer, subject to the following conditions:- “(i) The petitioner shall make himself available for in- terrogation as and when required; (ii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person ac- quainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and (iii) The petitioner shall not leave India without the pre- vious permission of the Court.” This order shall enure till 15 days after the filing of final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. within which period, the petitioner shall be re- quired to seek regular bail. (AJAI LAMBA) February 08, 2010 JUDGE avin