:1: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5445 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1449 OF 2007 Smt. Anusaya Ganpat Kamble. ..Applicant. Vs. Ashok Ganpat Kamble and ors. ..Respondents. Mr. V.S.Kapse for the Applicant. Mr.Dinesh Shah for the Respondents 1 and 2. Ms.Vandana Mahadik for the Respondent No.3-BMC. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 12th November,2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard both sides. 2. This is an application for interim injunction pending appeal directing the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to allow the applicant to occupy the premises which is Room No.706, Parel Shivneri Co.op. Housing Society, 7th floor, Kasturba Gandhi Nagar,Worli, Mumbai. It appears that the word "suit premises" has been wrongly mentioned in the application because the new premises has been allotted in lieu of the suit premises which was situated else where. As regards the suit premises the trial court has granted a joint decree in favour of the original plaintiff and the present applicant. In this view of the matter it is clear that the present applicant will be entitled to reside in the new premises :2: allotted in lieu of Room No.706. Grievance is however, made in the reply that she is inducting her married daughter on the strength of the joint decree in her favour. In the present application she seeks protection against the present respondents. Civil application is therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). It is however, made clear that there is no protection to the married daughters of the applicant. Similarly they have liberty to pursue the proceeding before the competent court. If the married daughters prefer any such proceeding, the same will be decided on its own merits. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)