IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-29863 of 2008 Date of Decision: November 14, 2008 Sanjeev Ahuja .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS Neeraj Bala .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition challenges Order dated 16.10.2008 whereby an affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent has been taken on record. On a perusal of the order, I find that it has been treated as a replication/ rejoinder to the reply filed by the respondent (petitioner herein) to the main application filed under Section 125 Cr.P.C. Contention of learned counsel is that the additional affidavit has changed the entire case originally set up on behalf of the respondent. I have considered the contention of learned counsel. The Trial Court would consider the Crl. Misc. No. M-29863 of 2008 [2] contents of the replication/ rejoinder including the fact, if established, that substantial improvements have been made by the respondent in the case originally set up. No ground for interference is made out. The petition is disposed of with the above observations. (AJAI LAMBA) November 14, 2008 JUDGE avin