IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3283 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision 23.07.2009 Surjit Kaur and another ......Petitioners VERSUS Gurmit Kaur and others ......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.P.S.Paul, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL): Assailed in this petition is the order dated 24.03.2009, passed by Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rupnagar, whereby the application for amendment of the plaint, filed by the plaintiffs-respondents (herein referred as 'the plaintiffs') was allowed. The plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration and joint possession claiming themselves to be the owners of 1/4th share and has challenged various sale deeds. Now by way of amendment, they want to challenge another sale deed dated 28.05.2001. The trial Court, after applying the parameters for allowing the amendment and while observing that if the plaintiffs are allowed to amend the plaint by introducing the plea for challenging the sale transaction dated 28.05.2001 (entered into by defendant No.1) in favour of Jaswant Singh, the nature of the case would not be changed. Heard. The amendment if allowed would not change the nature of the suit and also would save the multiplicity of the litigation. It would also not cause any prejudice to the defendants. The plaintiffs have already Civil Revision No.3283 of 2009 (O&M) -2- challenged various sale deeds and they by way of amendment want to challenge another sale deed which came to their knowledge lateron. The amendment is clearly within the purview of Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C.. Since plaintiffs have specifically pleaded that they had come to know about the transaction late. Neither any perversity nor any arbitrariness could be seen in the order. Dismissed. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 23.07.2009 mamta-II This petition is disposed of without issuing notice to the respondents with a view to imparting complete justice to the parties and to save huge expenses which may be occurred by the respondents as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. If, still dissatisfied, the respondents may move this Court for recalling this order.