CRM-M 19198 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M 19198 of 2010 Date of decision: 05.01.2011 Har Karan Singh Yadav and another ....Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Sr. Advocate, with Ms. Amandeep Sibia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) This is a regular bail application moved by the accused- petitioners. Accused-petitioner No.1 is said to be a property dealer while admittedly accused-petitioner No.2 is Nambardar of village Khedi Kankar, Police Station Nuh, District Mewat. Allegations against the accused-petitioners are that land shamlat deh which vests in the gram panchayat was agreed to be sold to the different people and power of attorneys were executed for the purpose of selling the land on behalf of some dead persons and on behalf of some of the minors. Petitioners are the witnesses in the power of attorneys. Petitioners being witnesses of the power of attorneys have identified dead persons as well as some minors. Not only this, power of attorneys were executed in Delhi as well as Chhatta, District Mathura. CRM-M 19198 of 2010 -2- Petitioner No.2 accused Nambardar of the village is not supposed to act against the interest of the panchayat. In the present case prima facie it seems that with intention to grab panchayat land they entered into conspiracy and have fabricated the documents to grab the panchayat land. At this stage, Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, learned senior counsel, seeks permission to withdraw the application. Dismissed as withdrawn. (Alok Singh) Judge January 05, 2011 R.S.