IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 17TH JANUARY 2008 / 27TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 2159 of 2008(F) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SHAILAJA N.R., AGED 48 YEARS, W/O.K.G.KAMALASANAN, NANDANAM, KODUMON P.O., ADOOR. BY ADV. SRI.N.SURESH SRI.JIJI MATHEW RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, ADOOR. 3. TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, ADOOR. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. C.K. GOVINDAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/01/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ========================= W.P.(C)NO.2159 OF 2008 ========================= Dated this the 17th day of January 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court challenging Exts.P1 and P3. Ext.P1 is the demand notice issued under the Building Tax Act and Ext.P3 is the order rejecting the appeal. Against Ext.P3 statute provides for a right for revision to the District Collector and that remedy has not been exhausted by the petitioner. For this reason, I dispose of this writ petition relegating the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy of revision available to her. Petitioner shall, if so advised, file a revision within one month from today. In order to enable the petitioner to avail of the statutory remedy and to obtain appropriate orders, I also direct that coercive action, if any, for realistion of any amount under Exts.P1 and P3 shall be deferred for one month from today. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE css/