IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13626 of 2007 Sri Kailash Yadav, Son of Late Ram Narain Yadav, resident of Village- Chakveli, P.O. Sahpur Patori, P.S. Tajpur, District-Samastipur ------------------------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Energy Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, Old Secretariat, Patna 2. The Chief Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Samastipur 3. The Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Samastipur 4. The Assistant Electric Engineer, Electric Supply Sub Division, Samastipur (Gramin) --------------------------- Respondents. ----------- 03 25-07-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vijay Kumar Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent nos. 2 to 4/Bihar State Electricity Board. The petitioner, who retired on 31.5.2007 as Class-IV employee from the Office of Respondent no.4/ Assistant Electric Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Samastipur, has prayed for direction to the Respondents to make payment of his retiral dues. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, all the retiral dues of the petitioner have already been paid. However, payment was made at belated stage. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that on delayed payment, the petitioner is entitled to get interest.Learned counsel for the Respondent/Bihar State Electricity Board also submits that payment has already been made. Since all the grievances of the petitioner during the pendency of the present writ petition have already been redressed, there is no need to keep the matter further pending. In absence of any specific averment, it is difficult for this Court 2 to record any finding on the point of interest. However, the Court is of the opinion that on delayed payment of retiral dues, the petitioner shall be entitled to get interest. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before Respondent nos. 3 and 4 regarding interest. If such representation is filed by the petitioner, both the Respondents are directed to examine the same in accordance with law and pass appropriate order without any delay. The writ petition stands disposed of . NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J. )