IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-5554 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: 25.02.2011 Sonia Devi & Anr. ..........Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate for Mr. P.S. Jammu, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Mor, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of Sonia Devi and Naresh Kumar for issuing directions to respondents No.2 to 5 to protect their lives and liberty at the hands of private respondents. Notice of motion was issued on 24.2.2010. In response thereto, reply on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 has already been filed and the same is on record. Learned counsel for the respondent-State in view of the reply filed submits that the petitioners have made statements that now they have no danger in their matrimonial life and are not in need of police protection. In view of the statements made by the petitioners, the present petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as such. February 25, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE Note:-Whether this case is to be referred to the Reporter .......Yes/No