IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.1075 of 1992. SUIT NO.1075 of 1992. SUIT NO.1075 of 1992. Basanti Devi Bhandula & Ors. ..Plaintiffs versus Rajesh Kadyal & Ors. ..Defendants None for the Plaintiff Mr.B.G.Vaidya for the Defendant CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 5th August, 2008. DATED : 5th August, 2008. DATED : 5th August, 2008. P.C. 1. On the earlier occassion a probate issued by Delhi High Court is placed on record. Today nobody is appearing on behalf ofthe plaintiff. The present suit pertains to certain properties of the deceased. 2. Learned Advocate Mr. Vaidya states that the probate issued by Delhi High Court shall be acted upon by the concerned persons. In view of this nothing survives in the suit. Hence, suit is dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) -2-