IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18440 of 2009 SANJAY KUMAR SINGH S/O LATE MANNU SINGH R/O CHANDAPARA, P.O- SIDHWALIA, DISTT- GOPALGANJ Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, NEW DELHI 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, MUZAFFARPUR 3. THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENRAL CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE 4. THE DIRECTOR, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, NEW DELHI ----------- 02. 21.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Union of India. 2. Petitioner participated in the selection process for appointment on the post of constable general duty in the CRPF. Having become successful, he was given appointment letter dated 4.7.2003, Annexure-4. Later appointment of the petitioner along with others, who were appointed in the same transaction was terminated under instruction dated 15.6.2004, Annexure-8. Aforesaid instruction dated 15.6.2004 was challenged by others before this Court by filing C.W.J.C. Nos.14711 of 2004 and 927 of 2005. The two writ applications was disposed of by this Court under orders dated 27.2.2006, Annexure-9 directing the respondents to abide by the result of the CBI investigation, which was made in connection with the impugned appointment process. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in compliance of the orders of this Court dated 27.2.2006, Annexure-9 after completion of the investigation by the CBI others have been reinstated but the case of the petitioner for reinstatement is not being considered, although petitioner has filed two representation requesting - 2 - the authorities to reinstate him as the others similarly situate have already been reinstated. The two representation of the petitioner is dated 10.8.2006 and 27.2.2007 addressed to the Deputy Inspector General of Police, CRPF, Muzaffarpur and the Inspector General of Police, CRPF, Bihar Sector, Patna and contained in Annexures-13 and 13/1 to the writ application. 4. Let the Deputy Inspector General of Police, CRPF, Muzaffarpur and the Inspector General of Police, CRPF Bihar Sector, Patna dispose of the aforesaid two representations of the petitioner, Annexures-13 and 13/1 in accordance with law and if the case of the petitioner is similar to that of others who have already been reinstated he also be reinstated, failing which the authorities would be obliged to pass reasoned order indicating as to why petitioner is not being reinstated. Any order either reinstating the petitioner or the order to the contrary be passed as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before the authorities. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)