\ IIIL lII(jl-1 C()URTOF KARNATAKA, (1RC111’ HLNCI-1 AT GULf3ARGA DA I l 1 Ellis ‘I HR 14tH DAY OF O(1OBF.R. 2009 131311’URE HON BL MR. JIJSIICR SIJF3HASH 13, ALl CRLP NO 9182 OF 2009 BKTW FEN SA( T \FPA, S/( . SI 1ARNAPPA PARDESI. A(TFA) 24 YRARS, X’C: CPd L)RIVER, RI i. RASAHA IAN QAS1J OUR, PQ LINGASIJOUR, NOW UNDER JUDICiAL Cl S’lODY :PETII*B)NER (By Sil K. Al PARAO & K DIIIRAJ KUMAR, AI)VOCAPES) 1 \ND S’I APE OI RARNATAKA. TI lEO I. IGH BALGANI JR POLICE STATION RAI Eli R RFSPON )KNI (H SrLS,K. BAI3SIiKBI\. HCGP..) 1H15 uRIMINAL PFT’i1iON PILED U/S.438 OP CR.P C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE 1 ETITIONERS PRAYING I HAP THIS HONBLE COl R’l MAY HP PLEASE]) B ENLARGE THE PFI I IT NER ON BAIL IN GRIME ) NO 12’/ 2009 OF BALAGANI P1 “.5 F( R TilE OP FENCES ii NISHABLE U/S 302, 201 R/W 4 flF lF( ‘1 his Ctimmna! Fetid m coming OP 101 O d’ i’s tins (tar, toe Court made the foFowirig ORDER Tins x ition flied un in see don 439 of Cr .P C , h ih accused Nol in riimc No. 120/2009 reØstcred on 314)7. 2U0 h flaiagaunui 1 oliee, Raichur district for the offences punishable U/S. 302, 201 r/w 24 IPC. Oxigiuaih, a case as a gistered on 26 07.2 tOO hr Liirgasugur police station in crime No 133/2009 iird on the question of jurisdiction. the same ri as U ansfened >o Ralagaunur pollen 2. The eouplrn rant who is the biothu ia-law of die dc ceased Sharanappa alleges that his sister Eashairima ir as given _n lOcH I iage a deceased SLmanapa as secon I wife, Accused No 1 Snangappa, the Iertioner herein cairn to the house of the complainant and picked up qiian Ci it iti i him and threatened I urn ai.eging that. when his father had already married and having children, how did the complainant’s family gave Eashamma to the deceased as second wife. That he suspects that Accused No. I and 34 other persons have counnitted murder of Sharanappa. 3. The petitioner is the main accused in the crime against whom serious allegations are made. The matter is still under investigation. The allegations made against the petitioner are serious in nature and the offence alleged against them is for th...e offence punishable U/S. 302 1PC., which s e.xeiusively punishrble with imprisonment for lifEr In view of the serious nature of offence alleged against the petitioner and having regard to the fact that the ease is still under investigation, I do not find any justification to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage and consequently, the bail petition filed by the petitioner is liable, to be dismissed. 4 A $Fi1v, Ii pttition is rcj ct( I Hocv 1ib’ry I res rwd to I pctth flu t icw hIs pu i 1)1 gnu tcf I ilaflx ci iicshect ‘f d Sd/s JUDGE VP