1 c ng>^ "i (^r THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 2-35' OF 2005 PETITIONER: Dansena, son of Shri Hari Prasad Dansena, aged about 38 years, resident of village Kosamnara, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) - Versus - RESPONDENTS ^y... f, \ *f' wf~ ^I. ^ n^y^ ,;•••'L,---' _..--•( "s y : .7 -..'i* ^•' .? 2, W<1? <»' -icy^ -^ ^/^ ^. State of Chhattisgarh, through : the Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Janpad Panchayat, Raigarh, through : Its Chief Executive Officer, Post Office and District - Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) Gram Panchayat - Jorapali, through : Its Secretary, Block Raigarh, Tahsil and District - Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) State Project Director, Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Chhattisgarh, Raigarh (C.G.) The Distriftt Mission Director, Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission / Collector, Raigarh. ^^^^SvW,^^e^' ^^!a^^v^^^S:i'S:»- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES226 L227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^p HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION N0. 235 OF 2005 Puranlal Dansena Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri V.R. Tiwari, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 7th day ofApril, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Guruji for one academic session. The services of the petitioner was discontinued after one year. 2. It appears that the appointment of the petitioner as Guruji was not in accordance with the Constitutional Scheme of employment. Even otherwise, his appointment was for one academic session and, as such, the petitioner has no right to continue in service or to be reappointed again in the next academic session. 3. It is further contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that similarly situated Gurujis have been considered by the concerned Collector and they on being found fit, have been appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade III. 4. It is prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation to the concerned authority and the concerned authority may be ..?:4@&^SK.u. ,^,?3!a"-^^ >%fe» 1 ^•-^y '•';in^S!iE BJI;)WBtR ;).&»." directed to consider case of the petitioner for appointment as Shiksha Karmi Grade III on his being found otherwise qualified and fit for appointment on its own merit and in accordance with law, to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State has no objection. 5. For the aforementioned reasons, this petition is disposed of with the above-stated liberty without expressing any opinion on merits. No order asto costs. c^ Gowri Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge llt.