.;:t«:)>- EKDN " GRE W un— 0' ’1 5} wxma maugmxgwmmw mmamuw 331mm m g gaggm ,‘mHmmmGARH‘Wiyév $7 {5/53 ' m/gaoz gri ainal §mlication gig. Tej Kwmar Pamdey. Son O33 5hr}. R.X.G.Pandey, Ass}. stant “:eacher; mastm} at Primary 53011001, Jinda; Tahsil aw £?istric:t Kawarflha; (chhatti sqarh) Pawan Kumar k, aush;k. . 30:3 015 ”Late Shri Kashi Ram. Assistant fgeacher; mmtmi at £>rimary Sch561. Jindiaa' Tehgil and biatri¢t Kawarc‘aha. (Chhatti sgarh) . Ftaja Ram $ahul. son of $hri Sewa 1*?am Sahm As Si st ant Ta ach er. Ibogted at 2?.rimary gahoel. Mbiia; Tehssil and Dis‘crict Kawazréha, (Chhatti 5g arh) ~ Chhatra§al Pars. Scashwami; $on aif Shri Kailash Puri Goshwazmia Assistant ’l‘eachgr, Posted at Primgary Schaol, bubha. Tab $i l am} Di $tri'ct Kawarélh eh: (Chi) atti sq arh) . a n Agnlgih‘gant’s; Varvu s u W , ' " Fr HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIseARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (s) No. 5119 of 2005 Pe'l'i‘rioners : Tej Kumar Pandey & o‘l'hers Versus Respondenfs : Sfa'l'e of Chha‘H’isgarh & o’fhers Singie Bench: Hon'ble Mr'. Jusfice Safish K. Agnihofri. Shri Sachin Singh Rajpu'r, Advocate on behalf of Shri Ramakarrr Mishr-a for the Pe‘tifioners. Shri V.V.5. Moorfhy, Dy. Advocate General wifh SmT. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advoca‘i'e for fhe respondenfsfSmTe. o R D E R (9* amber, 2006) 1. Learned counsel appearing for fhe pe'rifioners submH’s The? while working as Assisfan‘r Teachers/Upper Division Teachers, fhe pefi‘rioners have gone on Training To improve Their qualifica-fions on fheir own expenses and acquired B.Ed./B.T.I Examination i Cer'rifica'l’e. 2. According +0 learned counsel' for The pe‘rifioners, ‘l’he pe'rifioners 3 are en‘i'i'Hed fa Two advance incremen'fs in View of 'I'he decision of fhis Cour‘i in ‘rhe case of Yashwanf Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corpora'rion, Durg and ano+her {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}. This Cour‘r in 'rhe case of Yashwanf Kumar BharadWaj Vs. Municipal Corpora‘l'ion, Durg and ano‘lher (Supra), came To The conclusion 4 ThaT The Teachers, who had obTained B. Ed./B.T.I. ExaminaTion Cerfifica‘l'e on his own expenses, are covered by The circular dafed 24.12.98 issued by fhe STafe Governmen'r of Madhya Pmdesh. 3. Learned counse! for fhe pe'Hfioner's furfher submi'I's fha‘f 'l'he fads and quesfion of law involved in fhe presen'l’ cases are squarely covered by decision of ‘i’his Cour? in 'H'ie case of Yashwanf Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipai Corporafion, Durg and anofher (Supra), 1'0 which learned counsel appearing for ‘l'he respondenl's fairly concedes and agrees wi‘l’h ‘l'he avermen'r made by learned counsel appearing for The pefifioners. 4. Accordingly, 'l’he wrif pe'l'i‘rion is allowed in Terms of The order passed in The case of YashwanT Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, burg and anoTher (Supra), subjecT To verificaTion of The facT as To wheTher The pefiTioners have acquired B. Ed./B.T.I. ExaminaTion CerTificaTe on Their own expenses or noT. No order as To cosTs. x B$ 9aos“x:“¢g “is”? 4" o