IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14354 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 08, 2011 Sat Pal Aggarwal ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Ravindra Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has retired on 31.3.2011. Prior to his retirement, a charge sheet was served to him on 14.7.2010 and he was given time to file reply. The petitioner in his capacity as Agriculture Officer had purchased various inputs under National Horticulture Mission from the recommended firms at prescribed rates, for which action is in progress against him under Rule 7 of the Punjab Civil Services Rules as applicable to the State of Haryana. The grievance of the petitioner is that no provisional pension or other retiral benefits have been released to him. The petitioner has made a detailed representation on 10.4.2011. It appears that the case of grant of provisional pension or other benefits, which can be released to the petitioner, must be under consideration. Without going into the merits of the claim made, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation filed by the petitioner and consider Civil Writ Petition No.14354 of 2011 : 2 : releasing of provisional pension or other retiral benefits that are legally payable pending enquiry and can be released to the petitioner. Let this decision be taken within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. August 08, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE