IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARILAL FRIDAY, THE 16TH DECEMBER 2011 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 33034 of 2011(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M/S. HEBRON DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD., FIRST FLOOR, VENUGOPAL ARCADE, PULINCHODU, ALUVA-683101, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER MR. DEAN JAMES MATHEWS. BY ADV. SRI.DENIZEN KOMATH SRI.SHERRY J. THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALUVA CIRCLE OFFICE, ALUVA-683101. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALUVA POLICE STATION, ALUVA-683101. 3. MR. JOSE, PROPRIETOR, M/S.JANATHA TRADING CORPORATION, ALUVA-683101. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.SHYSON P.MANGUZHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 33034 of 2011(D) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER'S COMPANY BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 8-12-11. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE ab PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & K.HARILAL,JJ ------------------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.33034 of 2011 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T Pius C. Kuriakose, J On considering this writ petition, alleging harassment by respondents 1 and 2 officers of police at the instance of the 3rd respondent, we directed the State Attorney who took notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 to seek instructions. 2. Today, Sri.Shyson P.Manguzha, the learned Government Pleader on bahalf of the State Attorney submitted that accusations of police harassment are untrue. The 3rd respondent filed a petition against the petitioner, complaining that substantial amounts owed to the 3rd respondent are not being paid. On entertaining the complaint, the petitioner was asked to appear in connection with an enquiry to be conducted. No representative of the petitioner company appeared. The police does not intend to proceed further in the matter as the nature of dispute is civil and monetary. 3. We record the submissions of the learned Government Pleader. We dispose of this writ petition directing the W.P(C) No.33034 of 2011 2 respondents 1 and 2 that if in future, attendance of any of the functionaries of the petitioner company is required in connection with any enquiry or investigation they shall issue notice under Section 160 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to the petitioner. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE K.HARILAL JUDGE ab