WP(C) 2156/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. J. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. R. Chakraborty, learned Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate, Assam. The grievance of the petitioner is that the alleged inaction of the resp ondent No.4 towards disposal of the complaint made by the petitioner against the respondent No.6. According to the petitioner, the respondent No.6 has been runn ing a piggery firm for the last five years creating disturbance to the locality. The Circle Officer had notified the respondent No.6 to appear before him on 18. 5.2010 vide notice dated 14.5.2010 but he did not appear and thereafter no progr ess has been made in respect of the complaint lodged. Having regard to the nature of the grievance raised and having heard the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of directing th e respondent No.4 to look into the grievance of the petitioner and to pass appro priate order. However, no adverse order shall be passed without hearing the resp ondent No.6. Necessary follow up action in this regard shall be completed as exp editiously as possible, preferably within 31.7.2011. With the above directions and observations, the writ petition is dispose d of, without however, any order as to costs.