ubey [aged about «3‘ lllage I ' PostL Para V V d g n w 1str1ct Ralpur C G. 6mt ’Sav1ta DLbey w1fe of Naray unaram aed about 3 ears Smt adav KuntaJ ae iabout w1e 35 of ear Mo Boh Res1dent of Avant1 Viha olony, Vljay Nagar Ralpur TahSI nd Dlstrlct 1pur,[C G - an D D ]. z ' A _ ‘ ‘ P g 8- y e a r Y g dJB x f ys han ' La] t r' C I " a ‘ a ] XI-HC—78 EW,®$W,W mm Fri ' 200 'é Wm (W) wwm mmfrwm mmai%aan%¥r r %at%wan%:1 14.09.2G06 Shri Malay Kumar Bha :luri, Iearned counsei for the appellant. Heard on admission. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act‘ag ainst the impugned award dated 26.7.2006 passed by 12th Motor Accidert Claims Tribunal‘(F'.T.c.), Raipur in C.T.No. 60/06, by which an award of Rs. 1,48,000/- has been basEed in favour of the respondents. The appellant is the otvner of the vehicle involved in the accident which resulted in the death of Shiva Yadav who is son of respondents No. 1 and 2. The only ground on which this appeal has been preferred is that undisputedly at the time of atcident deceased Shiva Ya‘dav was sitting in an auto trolley which was daehed by the truck of the appellant from back as a result of which Shiva Yadav died. The vehiote was registered for carrying goods and as such ti e same was being used by the owner of that vehicle in. breach of conditi resulted because of compo ite negligence of the owner of both the r colliding vehicles and as s ch the owner. driver and the insurance company of the auto troitey ere also necessary parties. However, the ns of the policy, therefore, the accident XI-HC-78 EW;W,W “In?" m ...,.au/.go@uun., Hi . i 200g