1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3785 OF 2010 (Hemraj Shriram Dhok) -: VERSUS :- (The Bhandara Urban Coop. Bank & Others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri A. K. R. Saxena Adv for petitioner. Shri Dangre Adv for respondents 1 & 2. Shri Joshi AGP for respondent 3. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : OCTOBER 14, 2010. Heard Shri Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Dangre learned counsel for the respondent 1 and 2 and Shri Joshi learned AGP for respondent 3. Contention is, auction was assailed in revision because petitioner did not receive RRC. Shri Dangre has pointed out that RRC is of the year 2002 and as on date amount outstanding is roughly Rs. 32,000/-. Learned AGP for respondent no.1 has supported the impugned order. It is apparent that challenge to auction notice 2 is not because of any error therein or any error in auction process but because of challenge to RRC. Hence petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate steps, however he is aggrieved by the RRC as issued. With that liberty to petitioner present petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE SVK