1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.331 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4447 OF 2006 [Mr.Pawan Kumar Satyanarayan Goenka. Vs. State of Maharashtra] ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, office : Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, : appearances, Court’s : orders or directions : and Registrar’s orders : ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Ashok M. Saroagi, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.Raja Thakare, Counsel for C.B.I. Mr.H.J.Dedia, APP, for the State. CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : DATED : DATED : 21st August, 2008. P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant and the learned Counsel for the respondent-C.B.I. 2. The applicant came to be granted bail by this Court by order dated 9th February, 2007. While granting bail, a condition came to be imposed on the applicant that : "Applicant shall not leave City of Mumbai without seeking prior permission of DCB, CID, Unit-II, Mumbai." 2 3. Mr.Saroagi, the learned Advocate for the applicant states that when the co-accused was granted bail the condition imposed on co-accused was that whenever he wants to leave Mumbai, he shall intimate the office of DCB, CID, Unit-II, Mumbai. Hence Mr.Saroagi submitted that the above condition imposed on the applicant be modified and same condition as that imposed on co-accused be imposed on present applicant. 4. Looking to the facts, the condition imposed on the applicant i.e. Applicant shall not leave City of Mumbai without seeking prior permission of DCB, CID, Unit-II, Mumbai, is modified to the extent that whenever the applicant wants to leave Mumbai, he shall intimate the office of DCB, CID, Unit-II, Mumbai. Rest of the order dated 9th February, 2007 is maintained. 5. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. 3 [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]