pvr １ wp8253-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8253 OF 2011 Shri.Manoj Kantilal Soni. ...Petitioner vs. 1.Directorate of Industries and others. ...Respondents --- Mr.V.P.Savant i/b. Mr.P.M.Jadhav, for Petitioner. Mr.S.R.Nargolkar, Addl.G.P. for Respondent-State. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 20th October,2011. P.C.:- 1. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. It is clear from the record that the alleged deficiencies for which the technical bid given by the petitioner was rejected was not mandatory or essential pvr ２ wp8253-11 condition. Even according to the affidavit filed by the respondents, there was no non-compliance by the petitioner of any essential or mandatory condition of the tender. In our opinion, therefore, it would be appropriate to direct the respondents to consider the commercial bid submitted by the petitioner on the assumption that the technical bid given by the petitioner complies with the conditions. It is accordingly so ordered. In this view of the matter, therefore, the petition is disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.)