1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.10.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.BASHA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petition (MD)No.856 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.2 and 3 of 2011 Arulmigu Perumalsmy-Kothandaramasamy Temple, Palanganatham, Madurai, through its Fit Person ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Deputy Registrar, No.28, Madurai Urban Coop.Bank (Liquidated), 41-42, Krishna Rao Tank Street, Madurai. 2.The Official Liquidator, Madurai Urban Co.op.Bank, 32, Naicker New Street, Madurai-1. 3.R.Viswanathan ... Respondents Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the Notice No.Nil, dated 11.01.2011, published by the 1st respondent, dated 12.01.2011 in 'Daily Thanthi' Paper in respect of properties of the Petitioner Temple in R.S.No.346/1, Madakulam Village, Madurai, insofar as Schedule 'B' property Nos.1 to 3 are concerned and quashing the same. For Petitioner : Mr.Manohar For Respondent-3 : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai O R D E R [Order of the Court was made BY K.N.BASHA, J] The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition seeking for quashing the Notice No.Nil, dated 11.01.2011, published by the 1st respondent in 'Daily Thanthi' Paper, dated 12.01.2011, in respect of properties of the Petitioner Temple in R.S.No.346/1, Madakulam Village, Madurai, insofar as Schedule 'B' property Nos.1 to 3 are concerned. 2.Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai, learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent, would submit that the three properties involved in this writ petition have already been released from the order of attachment by the order of the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, the 1st respondent herein, in the Claim Petition filed by the 3rd respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Therefore, it is submitted that the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous. 3.Mr.S.Manohar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, would submit that the statement made by the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent may be recorded and the writ petition may be disposed of. 4.We have considered the submissions made by the counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5.Considering and recording the categorical statement now made before this Court by the learned counsel the 3rd respondent to the effect that the three properties involved in this writ petition were already released from attachment by the 1st respondent, the writ petition stands disposed of recording the statement of the counsel for the 3rd respondent. No costs. Connected MP(MD)Nos.2 and 3 of 2011 is closed. SD/- Assistant Registrar (RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To: 1. The Deputy Registrar, No.28, Madurai Urban Coop.Bank (Liquidated), 41-42, Krishna Rao Tank Street, Madurai. 2. The Official Liquidator, Madurai Urban Co-Operative Bank, 32, Naicker New Street, Madurai-1 +1cc to M/s.S.Manohar, Advocate, Sr.No.35783 +1cc to G.Prabhu Rajadurai, Advocate, SR.No.35682 gb GH : 31.10.2011 : 2p/5c ORDER IN WP(MD)No.856/2011 and MP(MD)Nos.2 & 3 of 2011 Dated:13.10.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/