1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR C.A.O. 830 of 2010 and M.C.A.ST.NO.11657 of 2010 in S.A.NO.590 OF 2006 (DISMISSED.) Chandrashekhar Pundlik Gondane ..vs.. Nagpur Municipal Corpn. And ors. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : AUGUST 31, 2010. Heard Mr.R.Joshi, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr.Puranik learned counsel holding for Adv.Jachak for respondent nos.1 and 2 and Adv.Muktewar for respondent no.3. Adv.Joshi states that S.A.No.590 of 2006 was admitted after framing substantial question of law. As the private paper-book could not be furnished in compliance with conditional order, the same came to be dismissed. The dismissal came to knowledge lately and hence the application has been moved for condoning the delay of 180 days. He points out that the private paper- book is now ready and can be filed immediately. Advocate Puranik contends that there is no just and sufficient reason to condone the delay. After noticing these facts, it is clear that there are no mala fide on the part of the applicant. Hence, 2 delay is condoned and prayer made in M.C.A. is granted. Second appeal is accordingly restored. However, same is subject to payment of costs of Rs.500/- each to Advocate Jachak and Adv.Muktewar by present applicant within period of two weeks from today. If the costs are so paid and paper-book is filed, the office shall restore the second appeal and proceed further in accordance with law. JUDGE chute