IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17838 of 2010 SARVESH KUMAR JHA @ SARVESH JHA S/O MAHESH JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6. 08.10.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, counsel for the informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302/120-B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 D.P. Act. In the First Information Report there is allegation against in-laws of the deceased that they had committed murder even though it was made out to be a case of suicide. When the post mortem examination was done a post mortem ligature mark was found but the doctor could not state definitely the cause of death and therefore sent the viscera to the FSL for further examination. The viscera report has now been received which reveals that no poisonous material was found in the contents of viscera. Considering that the petitioner is a medical practitioner and in custody since 4.11.2009, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other 2 surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 107/2009, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. In case there is any complaint against the petitioner of having threatened the prosecution party, an inquiry should be done in the matter so that no injustice to any party is done. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )