HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.26532 of 2011 Date: 22-9-2011 Between P.Venkata Subba Reddy … Petitioner and The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, A.P. Hindu Religious and Endowments Department, Nellore, Sri Potti Sriramulu Nellore district and 2 others … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.26532 of 2011 Order: Heard Sri K.Muralidhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Endowments appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, and Sri V.T.M.Prasad, learned Standing Counsel for the 3rd respondent. 2. The petitioner was granted lease of agricultural land admeasuring an extent of Ac.1-50 cents in Survey No.439 of Budamagunta village, Kavali Mandal, Sri Potti Sriramulu Nellore district, in the year 2001. As per the pleadings, he was identified as a landless poor person vide proceedings of the Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Department, Nellore, the 1st respondent herein, in Rc.No.A3/1626/2004, dated 30-5-2004. The lease was extended with an enhanced lease amount till 2011. The petitioner states that he made an application before the competent authority for extending the lease by a further period of three years. 3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition stating that even as his application for extension of lease is pending, the 2nd respondent- Inspector of Endowments, A.P. Hindu Religious and Endowments Department, Nellore, is likely to auction the leasehold rights. Reliance is placed on notification published in a Newspaper, wherein the lands situate in some other Survey numbers are proposed to be auctioned. It is the apprehension of the petitioner that since the 3rd respondent- Executive Officer of the temple, has initiated action for auctioning the lands, there is likelihood of his doing so, even in respect of the land of the petitioner. 4. It may be mentioned that admittedly there is no proposal so far or any action initiated by the 3rd respondent proposing to auction the leasehold rights in respect of the land in Survey No.439. Even if there is a proposal in that regard, the petitioner, who has been admittedly granted lease only up to 2011, cannot legitimately object. The petitioner has approached this Court on mere apprehension without there being any cause of action. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, at the stage of admission. No costs. ___________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J. 22nd September, 2011. Ak HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.26532 of 2011 22nd September, 2011. (Ak)