IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN THURSDAY, THE 28TH OCTOBER 2010 / 6TH KARTHIKA 1932 CRP.No. 746 of 2005() -------------------------- OS.19/2004 of WAKF TRIBUNAL, KOZHIKODE .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S)/DEFENDANTS ------------------------------------------- 1. ADITHIAM PARAMBATHMEETHAL SAROJINI, W/O.LATE RAMAKRISHNAN, PERUNMANNA AMSOM AND DESOM, P.O.PERUMANNA, KOZHIKODE TALUK. 2. AJITH KUMAR, S/O.SAROJINI, PERUMANNA AMSOM AND DESOM, P.O.PERUMANNA, KOZHIKODE TALUK. 3. MURALEEDHARAN, S/O.SAROJINI, PERUMANNA AMSOM AND DESOM, P.O.PERUMANNA, KOZHIKODE TALUK. 4. SHAJI, S/O.SAROJINI, PERUMANNA AMSOM AND DESOM, P.O.PERUMANNA, KOZHIKODE TALUK. 5. SREEJA, D/O.SAROJINI, PERUMANNA AMSOM AND DESOM, P.O.PERUMANNA, KOZHIKODE TALUK. 6. SWAPNA, D/O.SAROJINI, PERUMANNA AMSOM AND DESOM, P.O.PERUMANNA, KOZHIKODE TALUK. 7. NEENA, D/O.SAROJINI, PERUMANNA AMSOM AND DESOM, P.O.PERUMANNA, KOZHIKODE TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- KARUMPANAKKAL EDAKKAD KUNHOYI, RELIGIOUS WAKF, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER K.E.MANSOOR, S/O.K.R.KUTTIKOYA, AGED 24 YEARS, RESIDING AT POYILIL HOUSE, PERUMANNA AMSOM, VELLAYIKODE DESOM OF KOZHIKODE TALUK. BY ADVS. DR.K.B.MUHAMED KUTTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.K.M.FIROZ THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. -------------------------------- C.R.P.No.746 OF 2005 --------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of October, 2010 O R D E R ~~~~~~~ Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Under challenge is the judgment and decree of eviction with arrears of rent passed by the Wakf Tribunal. It is disputed that the property is a Wakf property. We notice the judgment of the Supreme Court in Ramesh Gobindram v. Sugra Humayun Mirza Wakf [210(3) KLT 862]. According to us, for the reasons stated in that judgment, the impugned judgment and decree cannot be sustained. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned judgment and decree and dismiss the suit as withdrawn giving liberty to the plaintiff/respondent to file a fresh suit. Fresh suit shall be filed within two months from today. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) (P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE) ps