IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU MONDAY, THE 26TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 7TH PHALGUNA 1928 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 388 of 2007(C) ------------------------------ CRA.241/1999 of SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC-II), THALASSERY CC.683/1995 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, THALASSERY .................... REVN. PETITIONER: REVISION PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1. K.PRABHAKARAN MASTER, S/O.KRISHNAKURUP, AGED 53 YEARS, PERINGATHUR AMSOM, KARIYAD. 2. M.K.MURALI, S/O.KUNHAPPU, 46 YEARS, KUNHIPURAYIL HOUSE, PEINGATHUR AMSOM,KARIYAD DESOM 3. K.V.M.ANANDAN, S/O.KANNAN, 46 YEARS, KIZHAKKEVATTAKANDY MEETHAL HOUSE, PERINGATHUR AMSOM, KARIYAD DESOM. BY ADV. SRI.P.NARAYANAN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT -------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. BY ADV. SRI. BREEZE M.S., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.R. UDAYABHANU, J ================================= CRL. R.P. NO. 388 OF 2007 C ================================= Dated this the 26 th day of February 2007 O R D E R The revision petitioner is the accused who was found guilty of the offences under sections 143, 147, 448 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code and released on probation under section 4(1) of the Probation of Offences Act. The findings are concurrent and on a consideration of the decisions of the courts below I find no reason to interfere. PWs 1 and 2 the occurrence witnesses have deposed as to the identity of the accused. The appellate court has observed that the order issued is the most lenient one. In the circumstances, the Crl. R.P is dismissed in limine. K.R. UDAYABHANU, JUDGE. RV