bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1502 OF 2009 PETITION NO.1502 OF 2009 PETITION NO.1502 OF 2009 Dattatraya Balkrishna Jadhav & Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. The Deputy Registrar & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.P.S.Dani for the Petitioners. Mr.V.A.Sonpal, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 6. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- V.C.DAGA,J. :- V.C.DAGA,J. :- V.C.DAGA,J. DATE DATE DATE : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2009 : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2009 : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners. This petition is directed against interim order dated 18th August, 2003 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Pune Division, Pune permitting third party to be a party respondent in the appeal. 2. It appears that Mr.Ashok Taware-respondent No.7 herein and third party applicant before Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Socieites, Pune Division, Pune, had made complaint to the Cooperative Department to remove names of petitioner and respondent Nos.3 and 4 from Managing Committee of the respondent Society alleging that they have committed various irregularities in management of the respondent Society leading to the action under Section 78 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. 3. After having heard learned Counsel for the parties and after going through the impugned order, :2: the presence of third party applicant is not going to prejudice the petitioner. In the above view of the matter, no interference is warranted with the impugned order at this stage. Petition is therefore dismissed in limine, leaving open for the petitioner to challenge the impugned order, in the event, ultimate order is found to be against the petitioner. No order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)