IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-25062 of 2009 (O/M) Date of Decision : October 12, 2009. Khurshid and another .............Petitioner(s). Versus. State of Haryana ..... Respondent(s). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH. Present:- Mr. R.S. Rai, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Karan Pathak, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Ashok Kumar Jindal , A.A.G. Haryana, for respondent-State. Mr. B.R. Vohra, Advocate, for complainant. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL). Counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners were initially arrested by the police and thereafter, they were released on regular bail. During the police remand, the recoveries were effected from the petitioners, and thereafter Section 307 I.P.C. was added at the subsequent stage and thereafter, the petitioners moved an application for grant of anticipatory bail before the learned Trial Court, which was rejected. He further contends that since no recoveries have to be effected from the petitioners and the petitioners are ready and willing to face the trial before the Trial Court, the prayer made in the present petition, be accepted. Counsel for respondent-State, on instructions from A.S.I. Rajender Singh, Police Station Nuh, Mewat, does not dispute the fact that the Criminal Misc. No. M-25062 of 2009. recoveries of weapons of offence, attributed to the petitioners, have already been effected from the them. In the light of the statement made by counsel for respondent- State, the order dated 10.09.2009 is confirmed. However, the petitioners shall have to comply with the provisions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) JUDGE October 12, 2009. sjks. -2-