IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42556 of 2009 JITENDRA ROY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 22. 03. 2010. Heard Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Hridya Prasad Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case instituted under Sections 3, 4 and 8 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is owner of the hotel and he was not present at the alleged place of occurrence when the Police came and apprehended a lady with male person in an objectionable position. In the facts and circumstances, this Court is not persuaded to accede to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is rejected. However, if the petitioner surrenders within a period of four weeks from today and seeks regular bail, then same may be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. m.p. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)