IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4961 of 2011 Date of decision : 23.09.2011 Tek Chand Arora … Petitioner Versus Balwant Kaur …Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.C.PURI Present: Mr.Barjesh Mittal, Advocate for the appellant. K.C.Puri, J. Report of the Rent Controller has been received in which, it has been mentioned that case is fixed for 01.10.2011 for evidence of the petitioner. Rent petition is stated to be pending since 12.03.2007. This Court in Revision Petition No.302 of 2010 titled as “Sandeep Ghai Vs. Neeraj Malhotra” decided on 04.05.2010, has issued directions to the Rent Controllers situated within the limits of Punjab, Haryana and Union Territory to decide the eviction petitions filed on the ground of personal necessity or by specified landlord, within six months from its institution. The relevant part of the order is reproduced as under:- “Every petition based upon an averment of personal necessity or a petition filed by a specified landlord would be disposed of within six months of the filing thereof. For expeditious disposal, the Judicial Courts shall have to accord noticeable and compulsive priority to those cases.” The same prayer was made in the case C.R. No.4398 of 2011 titled as “Umesh Uppal Vs. M/s Jindal Auto Distributors and others”, decided on 22.7.2011, which was accepted by this Court. The directions dated 4.5.2010 passed in CR No.302 of 2010 were ordered to be sent to all the District and Sessions Judges in the States of Punjab, Haryana and Union Territory for compliance. So, in these circumstances, the Rent Controller is directed to adhere to the directions given in CR No.302 of 2010 referred to above and decide the petition within a period of six months from the next date in the trial Court. Petition stands disposed of. ( K.C. Puri) Judge 23.09.2011 sd