IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH : HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST (21st) DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN Present: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Civil Revision Petition No.6244 of 2009 Between: M.V.S.R. Balaraja … Petitioner And: Kanithi Satyam & 3 others … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Civil Revision Petition No.6244 of 2009 ORDER: This revision petition is directed against the order dated 03.12.2009 in IA No.33 of 2009 in OS No.50 of 2009 on the file of the Agent to the Government, Khammam. 2. Heard both sides. Perused the record. 3. The petitioner herein filed OS No.50 of 2009 for permanent injunction. According to the plaintiff, he is the owner and possessor of the suit schedule land bearing Old Sy.No.13 and new Sy.No.54/3 and his grand father was the pattedar since 1944. According to him, the Settlement Officer, Badhrachalam, dismissed his application for grant of patta in settlement case on 17.12.2007, against which, he filed appeal before the Director of Settlement, Hyderabad, which is pending. He alleges that the defendants are threatening to interfere with his possession and enjoyment. Along with the suit, he filed IA No.33 of 2009 for temporary injunction, pending disposal of the suit. 4. The respondents/defendants opposed the same. The defendants have filed written statement and also documents before the trial Court. By impugned order, the learned Agent to the Government disposed of IA No.33 of 2009 by directing that the same is to be clubbed with OS No.50 of 2009. The impugned order does not disclose that the application for injunction filed by the plaintiff in IA No.33 of 2009 is disposed of on merits regarding relief prayed for thereof. The said IA is still pending, having been clubbed with the same suit itself. 5. In the circumstances, as the suit is also one for injunction and was filed in the year 2009, it is considered that instead of making any enquiry into the application for temporary injunction at this length of time about three years after filing of the suit, it is just and proper to direct the trial Court to dispose of the suit itself at an early date. Accordingly, the trial court is directed to dispose of the suit itself, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order, after giving notice to both parties. 6. In the result, the civil revision petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. __________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J Date: 21.12.2011 bss