THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.NO.23444 OF 2005 Dated 03-11-2005 Between: Y.Alexander, Hyderabad. ..Petitioner And The A.P.S.R.T.C. rep. by its Regional Manager, Picket, Sucunderabad and another …Respondents THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.NO.23444 OF 2005 ORDER: The petitioner was employed as a Driver in the A.P.S.R.T.C. His vision was defective and as such, he was retired from service with effect from 01-03-2004, much before he attained the age of superannuation. The petitioner states that he was entitled to be extended additional monetary benefit as per the circular issued by the 1st respondent dated 26-08-2005, but was not extended the same. He claims to have made a representaion dated 28-09-2005 for extension of such benefit, and complains that no action has been taken thereon. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Placing reliance upon the circular dated 26-08-2005, the petitioner submitted a representation, claiming certain benefits. The question, as to whether the case of the petitioner is covered by the said circular, and whether he is entitled for any benefits; needs to be considered by the respondents. The representation cannot be kept pending indefinitely. For the foregoing reasons, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to pass appropriate orders on the representation dated 28-09-2005, made by the petitioner, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ Dt.03-11-2005 L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. KO