IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 1403 of 2006 Date of decision: 21st March, 2009 Som Nath … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana … Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Mor, Senior DAG Haryana for the State. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Status report was called from the trial Court. District and Sessions Judge, Ambala has submitted the following report: “Kindly refer to Hon'ble High Court Endorsement No. 5062 (Criminal) dated 19.3.2009, on the subject cited above. I have the honour to submit that a criminal complaint bearing No. 26/1(161-1) titled Som Nath versus Balaki Rametc., under Sections 304/452/323/148/149/506 IPC was filed before Mrs.Ranjana Aggarwal,, Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ambala Cantt, on 13.1.2004. After recording preliminary evidence, all the 16 accused, arrayed in the complaint, were summoned to face trial under Sections 304/452/323/406/148 read with Section 149 IPC. Since offence under Section 304 IPC was triable by Court of Sessions, therefore, after securing presence of all accused persons, the case was committed to the Court of Sessions vide order dated 28.2.2006. Sh. A. K. Shori, the then Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc), Fast Track Court, Ambala, vide order dated 19.4.2006, formed an opinion that no offence under Section 304 IPC was made out in the case and the case was returned to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Criminal Revision No. 1403 of 2006 Ambala, for disposal in accordance with law. The complaint was thereafter entrusted to the Illaqa Magistrate on25.4.2006 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambala. On 20.2.2008 the complaint was dismissed on account of absence of complainant and the accused persons were discharged. The Court of Shri Jasbir Singh, Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ambala Cantt, which dismissed the complaint on 20.2.2008, was abolished on account of transfer of the Officer and the file is lying consigned in the record room. The status report is accordingly submitted, as desired.” Since the complaint has been dismissed and accused have been discharged, present revision petition has been rendered infructuous. Dismissed having become infructuous. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE March 21, 2009 rps 2