THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19395 of 2007 Date:02.11.2009 Between: Mohd. Fazal-Ur-Rahman and another. ..Petitioners and The Chief Commissioner and Special Officer, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and others. .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19395 of 2007 ORDER: The petitioners approached this Court for a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos.1 and 2 in not taking any action against respondent Nos.3 and 4 though they made constructions in premises bearing Nos.16-6-212/A, 16-6-213 and 16-6-214, Kattalguda, Chaderghat, Hyderabad, contrary to the sanctioned plan. In the affidavit, reference is made to certain proceedings in the civil Courts. The grievance of the petitioners has been that though the deviations resorted to by respondent Nos.3 and 4 were brought to the notice of respondent No.1 and 2, no action has been taken. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned standing counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2. The writ petition was filed two years ago. No interim order was passed in it. For one reason or the other, the writ petition is pending at the stage of admission for the past two years. By this time, the constructions said to have been made in deviation to the sanctioned plan are existing and they have been in occupation of certain individuals. In the interregnum, the Government introduced certain schemes for regularization. It is not known whether any applications have been made for regularization. This Court cannot proceed on the assumption that the same state of affairs remains even now. The petitioners can apprise respondent Nos.1 and 2 the present state of affairs and seek necessary reliefs. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioners to make a proper representation to respondent Nos.1 and 2, in case they feel that their grievance subsists. As and when such representation is made, respondent Nos.1 and 2 shall take necessary steps thereon in accordance with law, duly putting the affective parties to notice. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J 02nd November, 2009 GHN