C.W.P No. 20017 of 2010 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No. 20017 of 2010 Date of decision : November 29, 2010 Jagjit Kaur, ...... Petitioner v. ICICI Bank, ...... Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. N.K.Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Suri, Advocate for the respondent. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) On 10.11.2010, the following order was passed :- “ The petitioner has challenged the proceedings initiated by the respondent-Bank. Since it is admitted that the loan amount of the petitioner is irregular, in law no fault can be found with the action of the respondent- bank. However, since the loan was for a residential house of less than 100 sq. yards and since the petitioner is ready to regularize the account, in my opinion it would be in the interest of justice to give her some breathing time. Learned counsel for the petitioner has undertaken that an amount of Rs.30,000/- will be deposited with the C.W.P No. 20017 of 2010 ::2:: respondent-bank on or before 12.11.2010, further amount of Rs.30,000/- on or before 30.11.2010 and an amount of Rs.40,000/- by 31.12.2010.” Notice of motion for 18.11.2010. Dasti. In the meantime, status-quo regarding the property be maintained.” Thereafter, on 18.11.2010 the following order was passed :- “ Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent states that even if the petitioner makes the payment as per the interim order, it would fall far short of even the amount due today which, as per him, is to the tune of Rs.3,36,000/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that by 30.01.2011 the petitioner would do her best to clear the outstandings and prays that statement of amount be given to the petitioner. The said statement of account has been furnished to learned counsel for the petitioner in Court today. Adjourned to 29.11.2010.” Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that the petitioner would ensure that a sum of ` 3.50 lacs is deposited by 30.1.2011 and this offer is acceptable to counsel for respondent No.2. However, counsel for the petitioner has stated that the aforesaid amount includes some excessive interest and other outstandings. With regard to this, counsel for respondent No.2 has very fairly stated that once the petitioner deposits the entire amount, she would be at liberty to raise the dispute with regard to any excessive amount which may be charged from her. He further states that on the petitioner depositing the entire amount, her account would be regularized. With these observations, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ( AJAY TEWARI ) November 29, 2010. JUDGE `kk' C.W.P No. 20017 of 2010 ::3::