THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.31102 of 2010 Date: 10.12.2010 Between: Kum. Gulla Anuradha ..... Petitioner AND The District Collector, Warrangal and others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri D.Y.N.L.N. Chary Counsel for Respondents: Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside the order dated 30.11.2010 of respondent No.2, whereby he has confirmed the order dated 23.07.2004 of respondent No.3. The petitioner is a fair price shop dealer, whose authorization was suspended by respondent No.3, vide his order dated 23.07.2004. Feeling aggrieved by the non-disposal of the appeal by respondent No.2, the petitioner has filed W.P.No.23555 of 2010. This Court disposed of the said writ petition, by order dated 22.09.2010 with a direction to respondent No.2 to dispose of the appeal. In compliance with the said order, respondent No.2 has disposed of the appeal, by order dated 30.11.2010 by confirming the order of respondent No.3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders of respondent Nos.2 and 3 are unsustainable because the allegations on which the petitioner’s authorization was suspended are incorrect and they do not warrant suspension. In my opinion, whether the allegations made against the petitioner are correct or not need to be enquired into and decided by respondent No.3. It is a matter of surprise and concern that respondent No.2 has kept the enquiry pending for the last six years, while respondent No.2 has also kept the appeal pending for that long. This approach of respondent Nos.2 and 3 can hardly be appreciated. Therefore, while declining to interfere with the order of suspension of petitioner’s authorization, respondent No.3 is directed to conduct and complete the enquiry and to pass appropriate final orders within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.39571 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 10th December, 2010 GHN