^ 1^' Y BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARhLAT Nn.^?..^ S^^ ^s^^'y' &5 BILASPUR C>9^£ CONTEMPT EEXffle^l (Civil) No. \\^> /2011 ~7^- (Arising out of order dated 07.12..2010 passed in W.P. (C)No. 7159/2010 by Singte Bench ofthis Hon'ble Court) PETITIONER : \\^'^i^- <MC>^"r'.....<°°"" "".ds^" ^ ^^0»ulc ^^-^ ^^<-^ Durgesh Bansal S/o.- Shri Prakash Bansal, Aged about 19 years, R/o.- Ramnagar, Lingiyadih, District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS CONTEMNOR : Smt. Fariha Aalam Siddiqui, Sub Divisional Officer, Kota, Distt- Bilaspur (C.G.) ^ '^l^ ^^^CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT. 3TT^T^T f<^J<=h 37T§[^T 9h^i<^ ^f^a T~ ~^c[ ^ii^i^)^, ^-di'H4i(o. [^<ni^^< ww^r^w^ ^i^r m^^ :. ^^e+'W). (r-?> --\--^ u 't^^ST' ^TT^T ^Rn^R ^rft^ SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra iviohaln Shrivastava. J 04-04-2011 Shri Anup Majumdar, couns^l for the petitioner. Learned counsei for the p^titioner submitted that the order dated 7/12/2010 passed in W.P.tC)" N< decide the application of the petiti merits, within a period offour weete Learned counsel ror the ^.7159/2010,required the respondent to ^ner, in accordance with iaw, on its own fe3etitioner submitted that the petitioner copy of the order and decide the r^ dated 7/12/2010 passed in VV.P.({ copy from any other source. tt is made ciear that the ord cni^(<n4lti 'RTR^rf'? ftT^t <P?i^i< '^37f^R3TI^T approached the contemnor but tr(e copy of the order was not accepted, stating that unless copy of the ordef representation wiii not be decided, the copy of the order was sent by| pQtitioner further submits that tili representation (Annexure C/3) se< been received by the respondent. Taking into consideration tlj received directly from the High Court, the whereafter, the representation^along with registered post. Learned counsei for the date, the acknowiedgment of receipt of it along with copy of the order, has not ie submissions made, instead of issuing notices at this stage, it is directe{3 that the petitioner may submit a fresh representation before the respond|ent aiong with certified copy of the order and upon submission, the rejspondent shaii not refuse and due acknowledgment shall be issued v^ith regard to the date of receipt of certified presentation in accordance with the order ;) No.7159/10 without awaiting receipt of er of the Court is required to be complied with^upon production of certified c4py of the order, without awaiting receipt of the order of the Court or instructidns from any other authority. In case, the respondent does not decide thejrepresentation as directed by this Court f'^'^JI .^ .^ ^'^ ^ ^:i^g^^ ^r-^r\^'? i ~Tt^ ^l'^'iL'~zz %%^r^ ^..^^ ^n^i^T 'f^rwsn^T 5h^i<=p Trf^TT Deepu /.. -3-5cT •^li^|ldtLI. ^Tl1SLIjl^. ^<ni^y W^^iT ^<4l^ ^^^ .^o^C^^' M3/M "^ 200 'f^^ST" 3R^T'^nW^rftcT 5 within the time stipuiated, the p^titioner wouid be at iiberty to revive this contempt petition. vv'ith the aforesaid obsen/at|ons, the petition is finally disposed off. ^i^f<n<fli <-ii*4<yiT'?'feTst <M^K ^ 'srf^TT 3TT^T Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge r