:, (al‘W C’ .,.. N TE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CG) Writ Petition No. 2 I 45 /2004 ’ ...... Dr. N.N.Thaker agedabout 60yrs S/o Late Pt. R. S. Thaker Reader, P. S. M. iDepartment Medical College, Raipur, (CG) PETITIONER ‘ VERSUS ESPONDENTS kly ihrousliatie g 1ts ofehhattisgarlu Princ1pal Secretary, Public Health and Family Welfare Department Mantralaya—D.’K.S Bhawan, 1 v Raipur,C.G 2. The Dean Pt. J. N. M. Medical College Raipur, C.G RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE . CONSTITUTION OF INDIA I ( R W W 3aW WW W w ‘? >M o \4 r/d 7 m ‘E‘vl 200 ‘mm(W) ‘ mwm mwifwm $amm 3 1 2005 Shrl Rakesh Anthom Advocate for the petitionar. Shn Y ashwant Smgh, Gcvt. Adv. for the State. Application for urgent hearing .s allowed. It is pointed out that the petitiomer had tiled a petition before the Tribunal f ‘ l L hearing 0A. No. 830/1990 which came up for hearing'on 12-8-2002 and none ,_appea1‘ed on behalf ofthe petitioner that after abolition ofthe Tribunal th case was transferred to the High Court of ; ’VI P and was registered as W P No 132/2003 It is nowhere stated that iii whether that pet1t1on 15 pendmg Coui e1 does not have the copy of cider sheets fl Counsel for the petitioner sub med that he wants to Withdraw the petition .v r the ease Was adjourned. It is also stated with liberty to tile representation befo e the eOmpetent authority. Haviiig considered the facts an circumstances ofthe ease and without expressing any opinion on the meri the case, it is directed that the petitioner to make a representation before the co petent authority within 15 days and on such representation Being filed, the sa e be decided as early as possible preferably within 3 months. f The petition is accordingly disposed o. Gt DRJ—FS/350—12/20004450 000 \ stay 90 /(éwq:\§ s/ W ts §