1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 135 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 135 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 135 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2085 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 2085 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 2085 OF 2007 Ridhi R. Patade. .. Petitioner. vs. Uttar Bharat Sabha (Regd) & Ors. .. Respondents. None for petitioner. Mr. A.G. Kothari for Respondent/ in support of notice of motion. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & P.D. KODE,, JJ. P.D. KODE,, JJ. P.D. KODE,, JJ. DATE: 17TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATE: 17TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATE: 17TH FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C. . This is the notice of motion taken out by the the respondent for extension of time to complete the inquiry. For the reasons given in the affidavit in support of the motion, we are inclined to allow the prayer. Therefore, the notice of motion is made 2 absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Rest of the reliefs sought in the motion are not pressed. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (P.D. Kode, J.) (P.D. Kode, J.) (P.D. Kode, J.)