o ^.x? o ^ •^^\ w •J^i - 1^^ (O i'^i^S; ^ ^l^i - (SI£S 1 ^l.f j3 O Q J3t C/3\s I'g v z S '= (O M U ce £i c. o- f W U) o • -\ ff' ffii. HiGH COUR7 OF CHHATTiSGARH : BSLASPUR WRiT PET!T!ON (0 N0. 5500 OF 2011 TiTION£R Amanaseo Sinah versus ^ESPONDENT Regionai Transport Authority, Siiaspur. (vVrit Pstition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of Sndia) Singie 3ench : Hon'bte Sh" Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shrl Santosh Guota, Advocate for the petitloner. ^ufi ^nasnsHK t nsKur, "'SHQI Lswysr ?or THS ^i^is. (Passed on this 19"! day of September, 2011) 1) Grievance of the petitioner is that on 26.04.2011 (Annexure P-1), the petitioner moved an appiication before the respondent ror grant of regular stags carriage psrmit on the route Korba to Bilaspur vla Kusmunda, sakimongra, pali, Ratanpur and back one return trip daily. However, tii' date, the ssme has not been decided bvthe responoent. -earned counse! for the petitioner submits that this pstition may be disoossd o? wth a direction 1:0 ffie responcieni to aeciae ine sasa app'ication exoeditiousjy. 3) Lsarned counse! appearing for the State submits ihat the application of the petitioner shail be considered sna decidsd, in accordance with iaw and on its own mersts, within a Dsriod of 10 wseks from the date of receipt of a co&v of this ordsr. 4) In view of foregoing, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondeni to dscide the applicstion dated 26.04.2011 (Annexure P-1), fllsd by the petitioner within a period of 10 weeks from the date of receipt Oi 3 COpy OT I.HiS ofo@r. ,———,-^.^__, 5) Accordingly, ths writ peiition is disposed of. i ,,1 ;_ ^___ ~~' , 1 SATISH K. ANGNIHORI ^ Judge n liJI^S