R.S.A No. 738 of 2008 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A No. 738 of 2008 Date of decision : December 19, 2008 M/S Jai Durga Stone Crusher, ...... Appellant. through Mr.Gorakh Nath, Advocate v. Smt Satwati @ Brijwati & others, ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This appeal has been filed against concurrent judgments of the Courts below dismissing the suit of the plaintiff/appellant for mandatory injunction and permanent injunction for restraining the respondents from interfering with the Rasta on the land in dispute. Both Courts have found as a fact that the alleged Rasta was in the land of the respondents. They have also found that the plaintiff/appellant had alternative access to reach to his property and that in fact, he had agreed to purchase the Rasta but he never made the purchase. Learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to persuade me that R.S.A No. 738 of 2008 ::2:: these findings of fact are either perverse or can be held to be not arising from the record. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. ( AJAY TEWARI ) December 19, 2008. JUDGE `kk'