1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3829 OF 2007 Govind Anna Kadam & another. ...Petitioners vs. State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents. --- Mr.Vijay P.Patil, for Petitioners. Ms.S.S.Bhende, for Respondents 1 to 4. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & V.M.KANADE, JJ. DATED: 3rd DECEMBER,2007. P.C.:- 1. The learned Counsel appearing for respondent nos. 1 to 4 states that the alternate land bearing gat no.371 and 375 which is mentioned in paragraph 4 of the order dated 23.8.2000 passed in Writ petition no.3858 of 2000 2 will be acquired by the respondents under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act. The statement is accepted. 2. As the respondents are willing to acquire the land under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, as and when that process is started, the petitioner will have an opportunity to object to the acquisition. In this view of the matter therefore, in our opinion, no further orders are necessary in the petition. The petition is disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (V.M.KANADE,J.) ---