IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5848 of 2011 SUNIL KUMAR RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.03.2011 It is true that the petitioner was the association of the deceased on account of bearing the allegation of firing three shots to kill the father of the informant. However, the trial proceeded and during that course five witnesses were examined including informant who did support the case, though not being eye witness thereof. Considering the facts, let the petitioner namely, Sunil Kumar Ram be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Fast Track Court No. II, Patna in connection with S. Tr. No. 1104 of 2010 arising out of Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 183 of 2003, with condition:- (i) That if any public witness has to be examined, the petitioner shall neither make any attempt either to coerce him or to threaten him; (ii) Petitioner shall remain physically present in the trial Court on the dates fixed even if there was no purpose for such appearance; (iii) If the petitioner appears, in the meantime, committing any offence which could be 2 detrimental to the law and order situation or to the public order of the society, then in that case, the Court below shall assume that this order had not been passed by this Court and take the petitioner into custody after cancelling his bond. Anand Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)