IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43781 of 2008 1. SUKRIT RAI 2. BANKA RAI BOTH SONS OF GHUGHALEE RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RATANPUR, P.S. PIPRA KOTHI, DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN----------------PETITIONERS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR------------------OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 03. 25.11.2008. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to correct the name of petitioner no. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are accused in a case under Section 366A, 120B/34 of the Penal Code. They are named in the First Information Report along with two others and are alleged to have abducted the daughter of the informant for the purposes of marriage. It is submitted on their behalf that from perusal of the First Information Report, itself it would appear that petitioners have assisted the informant in searching the victim. It is also submitted that victim girl has since married with accused no. 3, Badri Rai @ Manoj Rai and is living with him as man and wife, which fact has transpired during investigation. Let the court below verify such fact and if it is correct that during investigation, the Investigating Agency found Badri Rai @ Manoj Rai and the victim living together as man and wife then the petitioners, namely, Sukrit Rai and Banka Rai are directed to be - 2 - released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari in connection with Pipra Kothi P.S. Case No. 34 of 2008. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J)