H!GH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BiLASPUR WP.fSyNo. 1424 of 2008 Petjtioner Vsrsus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. Smt. Preetiba!a Kannauje. W/o Shri Ajay Kumar, Agod about 32 years, R/o C/o Government MiddSe Schooi Bori. Block Dhamdha, District Durg, C.G State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of School Education MsRtraiaya, DX.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Biock Education Officer, Dhamdh-a, District Durg, C.G. Chief Executive Officer, JanpacS Panchayat Dhamdha, District Durg, C.G. Rajendra Sahu. Shiksha Karmi C!ass- JJ, Kapisda, Block Dhamdha, District Durg, C.G WRST PETSTOSN UNDERARTSCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTSON SingSe Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnshotri, J. Shri Somkant Vermia, Advocate for the petjtioner. Smt. Smitha Ghai, Panel Lavy'ysr for the respondents No.1 & 2. ORALORDER (Passed on this 4tn day of March, 2008) Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner submite that the petstioner was appointed as Shiksha Karmi Gracie-SI!. According to her placement in ths seniority iist she was entitled to promotion to the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade-!! but her name was not included In the list of the candidates who v/ere recommended for promotion. Besng aggrieyed the petitioner submitted a representation dated 16.1.2007 (Annexure P/6) to the Coiiector, Durg. Learned counsel appearlng for the petitioner further submits that the DistrSct Education Offlcer. Durg has recommended to the Chief ^ 2 Thakur 3. Executivs O^cer, Janpad Panchayat. Durg on 13.2.2007 (Annexure P/8) to take appropriate steps Sn accordance v»'jth iaw and pass appropriate order. St is apparent that the order rscommending the name of the petitioner v»'as sent on 13.2.2007 and no steps has been taken as yet. The respondente are weIS advised to pass appropriate order, in accordance with jaw, v/ithjn a reasonabie period, expeditiousSy. Sn vjev^ ofthe foregoing, the petitjon stands disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge