1 wp-3207-09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION W.P. NO.3207 OF 2009 Pune Zilha Sahakari Doodh Utpadak Sangh Ltd. ..Petitioner Vs. Chandrashekhar Damodar Zanje..Respondent .... Mr. J.A.Shekhar i/b M/s.J.Shekhar and Co. for Petitioner Mr. A.S.Rao Adv. for Respondent. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 16, 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned counsel for the Respondent no.1. 2. Respondent No.1 was working as Clerk from 1973 with the Petitioner. He came to be dismissed from service from 12.1.1983. Respondent No.1 filed Complaint before the 3rd Labour Court, Pune being Complaint No.(ULP) 53 of 1988. By order dated 31st December, 2008, the said complaint came to be allowed. The Petitioner was directed to reinstate the complainant with 50% back wages and continuity of 2 wp-3207-09 service. Being aggrieved by the said order, this petition has been preferred. 3. It is seen that the petition is directed against the order of the Labour Court whereby complaint came to be allowed. As the Petitioner has efficacious alternate remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the present petition. However, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to adopt alternate remedy. The learned counsel for the Respondent No.1 fairly states that in case the Revision is preferred before the Industrial Court against the order of Labour Court within four weeks from today, Respondent no.1 shall not raise any objection as far as delay in preferring revision is concerned. Hence, if such revision is filed within four weeks from today, delay shall be condoned and the revision to be proceeded with on merits in accordance with law. 4. Authenticated copy of this order be issued to the parties. 5. Petition is disposed of. [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]