1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3114/2009. (1.Vitthal Prakash Lipne and Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.RF Totla, Advocate for Applicants; Mrs. BR Khekale, APP for State. ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 14 th September,2009. 1. Heard learned Counsel. 2. The accused in custody from 4.8.2009 seeks to be released on bail for an offence which was initially registered under Sections 394,395 r/w 34 of IPC, vide Crime No.I-228/2009 and then altered to Section 395. 3. Though there is recovery, still the investigation is in progress. The sister of the accused, may be facing some difficulties but for that reason bail is not only answer. Question of liberty of the accused/applicant may play paramount role, however, liberty of those, could not be arrested in the manner the offence is committed. The distinction tried to be made in terms of Sections 394 and 395 about the punishment is incorrect. No bail 2 criminal application rejected. 4. Observations are prima facie in nature. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/cran3114.09