1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.03.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE K.SUGUNA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.ARUMUGHASWAMY W.A.(MD).No.409 of 2011 and M.P.No.2 of 2011 1.The Chief Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Trichy Zone, Thennur. 2.The Superintending Engineer (Department), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, S.S.Complex, Trichy I. : Appellants Vs. S.R.V.Matric Higher Secondary School, Represented by its Correspondent, B.Satyamoorthy, Chennai Main Road, Samayapuram, Manachanallur Taluk, Trichy District 621 112. : Respondent PRAYER: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 20.04.2010 made in W.P.(MD).No.5070 of 2010 on the file of this Court. Prayer in WP.5070 of 2010: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 31.3.2010 and thereby re-locate the Tower Nos.78, 79 and 80 in respect of 110 KV EHTline and 388 and 389 in respect of 230 KV EHT line in the petitioner school. For Appellants : Mr.M.Sureshkumar For Respondent : Mr.Venkatachalam Senior Counsel For Mr.R.Karthikeyan JUDGMENT ************* [Judgment of the Court was delivered BY K.SUGUNA, J] This Writ Appeal is filed as against the order dated 20.04.2010 passed in W.P.(MD).No.5070 of 2010. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2. It is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellants that identical orders were passed in W.P.(MD).No.2176 of 2010, dated 22.02.2011 directing the appellants – Board to remove the electric poles and service lines without insisting the private respondent to bear the expenses for the same. As against the same, W.A.(MD).No.932 of 2010 was filed by the respondent in the said Writ Petition. A Division Bench of this Court, by Judgment dated 22.02.2011, had dismissed the said Writ Appeal. According to the learned Standing Counsel for the appellants, the facts are identical and the relief sought for is also identical. 3. In view of the above, this Writ Appeal is also dismissed following the Judgment dated 22.02.2011 passed in W.A.(MD).No.932 of 2010. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed. sd/- Assistant Registrar (C.O) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar (C.S) To 1. The Chief Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Trichy Zone, Thennur. 2. The Superintending Engineer (Department), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, S.S.Complex, Trichy I. + 1 cc to Mr.M.Sureshkumar, Advocate, SR No.12358 JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A.(MD).No.409 of 2011 31.03.2011 NB RJ/18.4.11 2p/4c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/