THE HIGH COXJRT OFCH.HA^mSGARH AT BlLASPUR. WRIT PEnTlONl^ro ^^772<)F 2008 PETITIONERS s'b ^-"^ 1. Ramadhar S/o Ram Sohagi, ageda-bout 36 years ,2. Srht. Puna Bai widow of Ram Sohagi, aged about 60 years, / 3. Mahesh Das Ratre S/o Baniya r--" \. RESPONDENTS Das Ratre, aged about 46 years, - ^ All are resident of Gandai, Tahsil Chhuikhadan, ©istnfct Rajnandgaon G.Gg; ; •».•••••.• ••:,•• (Judgment Debtor/C?uarart rs) VERSUS 1. f State Bank of In<|ia, Branch -.•:..• f Khairagarh, ThroUgh the Manager, Khairagarh, District Igaon C.G. (decree holder) 2. Nageshn Bai widow . of „I?ajmahant Nain Das Kurre, • agedaboiut 61 years, 3. ; Pradip Sori of Rajmahant Nain Das Kurre, aged about 36 years,, ;, ,. '.,^,. , 4. Amrit Ram Son pf Rajmahant Nain Das Kurre, aged abouf 32 years, . • : i .- i.11 It'ri •1^'iii l.i a i.'UII W-: B !i fi '{ ^5d ^IB^S (o-^ 3S>-V ^—~--r ^ rciais[OlICT33T- 800Z; 40^^-g' •QNja^NOIAIAad J;raM •ands^ia jw HsvosiA^VEmodOAanoo HOiiH gHj, ~':"'.:lfi'!'.''^^|'|'|l|!")9tl'-»W!ii11 :® /5. Muntia @ Prithwi Ram "Sori of Rajmahant Nain Das Kurre, aged about 28 yeai-s, ( 2 to 5 are-legsil heirs of originaTJudgmenl: debtor) Respondent no. 2 to 5 are resident of viUage Mohtara, Tahsil Saja, District Durg, Present address , Gandai," Pandariya, . Tahsil CKhiukhadan, " District Rajnandgaon, G.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227__OFL^tHE CONSTrrUTION OF JNDIA FOR ISSITE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAlMtUS/CERTIORARl ETe. OR DIRECTION/ORDERIN THEUKE NATUREETC. JMAY THIS PLE^SE TQ YOURj,OiRDSHIP, The humble • petitipn of the petitioners named above most respectfully showeth:- - "^l PARTICULARS OF THE PETmONERS. ; Asmentioned in the cause tifle. PARTICULARS OP THE RESPONDENT. As mentioned in the cause title. PARTICULARS OF THE ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE PETmON IS BEING MADE: 2. 3. •4B HIQH CGURT OF CHHATTtSSWW AT BiLASPUR Sinaie8ench:Hon'bieShriJusticePrashantKumarMi8hra tF^-f^-s'-sfiSiij^r^fs. 'fc ! Stt'./NEKS RESPONDENTS fritPe(ition(227yNo.2W2^2008 RainauhaTandewers. Versus StateBaHkoflridiaandbtheES. Shri Rai^h Pandey and Shrl Dashrath Prajapati, counsef for e ,**Ui fssnwiera- ..,,^.'.,^. , ,\ .:^,, :,. ;,, :; :; ;:;^ :',•...:.•,;'' StMftBh^ekSfiatTOa.GouHseifcFtherespondentNo.l. W@TPETtTt©NUNDERARfKSLE2270FTHECONST(TUT10 QF ORALCT©ER '(02.13.2N^.% ',• The petftiQn&re are judgmerrt debtsre'a^instsrtiiimexecuuonCase No. 2 B^ Is penuing inthee<HRt<rfAldiyona(Di5tridJudge,i^ The suit orefsned by the respondwrt No.1 fer recwery g{ f?s.i»t>8SQ/-' together wlth inter^ @ 165% was d^T^^^ ^ 04W^^2. Thepstitioneisafegy^ntQis^thi'itoaretranscKiti^ (2) The^pefitioiiers^ov^^^^aBRi^tioffi^deR;SeGtiGns^47^:J1S1^ Ofder 21 Ruie1lQfCP^.,whicMhasl^nparttyailowedt%thea'xwiffiRi Court. Whiie ailowiiig ffie petitioners psayer (w seffing ^ide attaehmwit of the imrnQvabte property, it has rejectetf the othef prayer made iri tfe appilcation to the efi^ tti^ the ex^yti^ rannot prDes^ ^air^ M thena was an agreemerit betweentile bomnaCT' and guaianfQis that iii the event suit it decreed the Wtecution shai! not be instiwtad ayainst ttie guarantofs but shaS! only pKweeu c^ainst ttse tewrower. (3) Admittediy, no such agreeR'ient in vmfing is in existenee arid furthw that Inany case,as per petitioneis owishomngtti&ggreemerrtwasltwteeen ^^. %- u, •fn -2.-..: ' ! . :.' :' .':;1 •,: . ',•• "1/ . the Borroww and gu^antQi' and rtot wth thn decree hsrfder. in ttis view <rf the matter, ttse ieamed execufing Couit has rghfiy t'emcted^ the ofajecti^ ttsesegrounds. ': . • . ' 1; • / : . . ,' (4) The pther ubjwtoi taised by the pefitionets was that the »»ecution having Femain'sd cending for rnpre than IA yeats, it cannot prooBed a^inst them. Qn perusal of the execution apRlication availabte at page3Q oftiie papeer book it woutd appear ttiat fte said ^plicatiori wss presented yn IE^ MaFch,1995toex«Mtethed«;re8gtantedon04^39rtS©2.TheG6yrfeuNOTy has ateo obsCTvedthatcoynsetfQr^iepr^entpetiSonstShaTOappeafaJtn coufse of execution proceeding gnd sought fime to {teposit the decreetei amuunt. Thus on th^e groyndsth®tnal Court has rejwied the olijectipn. <S) cin^^ni^^tKjs^<3Qy(£ttie|^^ ofjunsdictionwarranSnyfrrtw^Ni^^tHi&©ourtMnd6i^tM Constitufion of (ndra. Th& wft petitsQn ss ^ewld af any subsfetent»whis;h falls and 1s hereby aismisseeS. _____^_ Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge )<-- ;l-'. ^.. l':•....- -i-ssSSSs-',