//1// EN THE HEGHmm? @FJUmeCMEJREAT BEASPiJRgCoQ EN“ P, gg) Ng,é?wé wag PETH‘EQNER Jageshwar Lal Komare S/o Shri Prem Singh Komare, Ag6 abGut 42 years, R/O BalakAashmm Orchha, Narayanpur (CG) VERSUS . e’e § «I 5§§ESmN§§ENT$ /'L State ofChhattisgarh Through- S€cr6tary, Schedukd Caste, Schedulai Triba and Bakward Ciass Weifare Dspamnent, DK. S. Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur (CG) "Ehe Csmmissiaher, Tribai Deveiopment Raipur (0G,) The Seqretary, Mata Rukamani Sewa Sansthan Samitij Dimrapal, Tah. 81, DiSErici—Jagdalpur (CQ) KW?EEM@N@NEW§CLE§22§QWmNmaN m? ENMA ' ‘ 1. Pamimiam M" §h§m§e$i$mmg As Eligmionea‘i abovai in thg cause ti’ds. ?ar€§w§ar§ aft§w Rgmwid‘emg ’ Ag maz‘tiamaai ahova in the causa title. ‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION 1S) No. 6706 of 2009 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB Hon’ble Sim Satish K. AgluhotlyJ Present Shn S P Kale Advocate for the pet1t1oner Shn A V Shndhar Pane] Lawyer for the State/respondents l and 2 ORDER ORAL) (Passed on 16 day of November, 2009) With the consent of learned counsel for the parties: the matter is heard finally. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the instant petition is > squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Smt. A.Lall v. State of Chkam'sgarh & Others], thus the petitioner may be pennitted to make a representation to decide his case in the light of aforestated decision, subject to verification asto whether the respondent No. 3—Institute is a Government Aided school and the petitioner is a teacher within the sanctioned strength; 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents 1 and 2 submits that in the event, the petitioner make a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance, with law, within a period offour weeks nom the date of receipt ofthe representation. 3. In View of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. - ‘ Sd/- Satlsh K Agmhotrl r Judge ‘E ‘ 1 2007 (1) BLJ 26s Amjt’ l PETITIONER Jageshwar Lal Komare. ‘ VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh &