Page no.1 M.Cr.C. no. 8643/2011 14/11/2011 Shri Sanjay Sharma, Advocate for the applicant. Shri B. L. Yadav, Dy.;A.G. for the respondent – State. Arguments on the first bail application under section 439 of Cr.P.C of the applicant Vasim heard. The applicant is involved in Crime no. 354/2011 of Police Station- Y. D. Nagar, Mandsaur registered under sections 363, 366, 376, 506 of the IPC and sections 3(2)(5) of the SC & ST ( Prevention of Atrocities) Act According to the prosecution story, on 05/07/2011, prosecutrix Sunita was missing, hence on report, a missing person report no. 25/2011 was registered. She was recovered on 16/07/2011. From her statement, it revealed that she was enticed by the applicant for marriage and after threatening her, he took her from Mandsaur to Bhilwada, where they stayed in a hotel and where the applicant outraged her. Thereafter, they went to Ajmer and then came to Mandsaur, from where she was recovered. Hence on report, the above offence was registered and the applicant has been arrested. It has been argued by the applicant's counsel that he has been falsely implicated in this case. Age of the prosecutrix is in between 16 to 18 years. She was the consenting party. She also deposed that before the incident, she had physical relation with the applicant. This is a consent case. Trial will take time. Hence, he should be released on bail. The respondent has opposed the bail application. Considering the circumstances and after perusal of Page no.1 the case diary, this bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the applicant be released on bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- alongwith one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court for his appearance before the said Court on all dates as may be fixed in this behalf. C c as per rules ( I. S. Shrivastava, J. ) amol