IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36572 of 2010 BAHADUR RAJAK, SON OF BINDESHWARI RAJAK Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 21.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State. Admittedly, informant filed a complaint case bearing Complaint Case No. 960C of 2006 which was converted into Parbatta (Maraiya) P.S. Case No. 09 of 2007 for the offence under Sections 304 (B), 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is husband of the informant’s daughter. Allegedly, the marriage of petitioner had taken place six years ago with the informant’s daughter but subsequently, petitioner along with his family members committed the murder of informant’s daughter on account of non-fulfilment of dowry demand. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner’s wife fled away in the year 2001 along with daughter of the petitioner for which petitioner filed a Sanha before S.H.O. of Kashmiri Gate Police Station, Delhi and after five years of the aforesaid occurrence, informant lodged this false case suppressing real facts. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State, submits that in course of investigation, two witnesses have stated that petitioner had killed his wife and daughter at Delhi. Admittedly, the statement of the aforesaid witnesses were recorded in the year 2010 that is after 4 years of filing of the above stated case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance as well 2 as submissions of the parties above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with above stated Parbatta (Maraiya) P.S. Case No. 09 of 2007. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)