1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 146 OF 2009 Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. Surendra Singh Ghattorode & Anr. ...Respondents. Mr. Nikhil Mehta i/by Disha Karambar for the Petitioner. Mr. Pramod Rathane for Respondent No. 1 & 2. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 19th JUNE, 2009. P.C.- 1. The petitioner has invoked Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short “The Act”). By Order dated 17th March 2009 this Court has, after hearing both the parties, directed the parties not to create third party rights and/or part with possession of three suit vehicles. 2. The statement is made that out of three vehicles, two vehicles had already been taken in possession and disposed of by the petitioner and adjusted the sale proceedings. One vehicle No. KA SKT/- 2 35 A 338 having Chassis No. YPH-121353, Engine No. YPE 437104 that is at Serial no. 1 in prayer clause (a) of the petition is still in the possession of the respondents. 3. The learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 1 makes statement that they will surrender the said vehicle within three weeks. In view of this, nothing survives in this petition. 4. The submission based upon the Supreme Court Judgments’ with regard to the jurisdiction of this Court to entertain such application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 at Mumbai is kept open, in view of above. 5. Resultantly, the petition is disposed of. However, three weeks time is granted for respondents to surrender the vehicle. 6. No costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) SKT/-