IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 21.07.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.No. 12106 of 2010 and M.P.No. 1 of 2010 G.S.Chandra Sekaren ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Collector, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram. 2.The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition), SIPCOT, Unit IV, Sriperumbudur Scheme, Irunkattukottai, Sriperumbudur. 3.The Managing Director, State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu (SIPCOT), having its office at Marshalls Road, Egmore, Chennai- 600 008. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay to the petitioner the differential compensation amount in respect of the acquisition of 2.95 acres comprised in Survey Nos.301/1, 2,3,4 and 5 of Pondur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District as per the Common Order dated 30.11.2009, passed by the Honourable Division Bench, High Court, Madras in Appeal Nos.331 to 371 of 2008. For Petitioner : Mr.Rathina Asohan For Respondents : Mrs.Lita Srinivasan, Government Advocate for R1 and R2 Mr.M.Devaraj for R3. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ ORDER Heard Mr.Rathina Asohan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mrs.Lita Srinivasan, learned Government Advocate appearing for the first and second respondents and Mr.M.Devaraj, learned counsel for the third respondent. 2.The land of the petitioner in Survey Nos.301/1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Pondur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District to an extent of 2.95 acres was acquired under the Land Acquisition Act. He seeks a direction to the respondents to pay the differential compensation as per the Common order dated 30.11.2009 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Appeal A.S.Nos.331 to 371 of 2008. It is admitted that the Appeals referred to above are not relating to the acquisition of land in Survey Numbers in issue. Hence, the petitioner cannot claim compensation based on the order of the Appeal. Furthermore, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he sought a reference to the Sub-Court relating to compensation as he was not satisfied with the quantum. It is also stated that the reference is pending before the competent Sub-Court. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, there is no merit in the writ petition and accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Asst.Registrar /True Copy/ Sub.Asst.Registrar mps To 1.The Collector, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition), SIPCOT, Unit IV, Sriperumbudur Scheme, Irunkattukottai, Sriperumbudur. 3.The Managing Director, State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu (SIPCOT), Marshalls Road, Egmore, Chennai- 600 008. + 1 cc to Mr. Rathina Asohan, Advocate SR.53139 + 1 cc to Mr. Devaraj, Advocate SR.52884 + 1 cc to the Government Pleader SR.53061 W.P.No. 12106 of 2010 and M.P.No. 1 of 2010 BK(CO) EU 10.08.2010 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/