_ wxag?/_ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHH‘ATTISGARH AT WRIT PETmQMS} No. \{OH new. PETITIONER: /,, Artl Das Digambar, son of Late Amar Das Di-gambar, aged about 67 years, Retired Upper Division Teacher, Bakeroma, Tahsil- Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. Versus , Resgondents‘; /l. State'of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary; Department of Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawarr, Raipur, Chhattisgarh'. / 2'. Director, Lok Shiksh-an Sanchanaiaya, Ch'hattisgarh, Raipur, Ch-hattisgarh. / 3‘ The Accountant General of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur; Chhattisgarh. /4. District Education Officer, District Raigarh', Chhattisgarh. 3am WW W mmwPG/No y %;Qm WW(W) @ WW3“??? WW ?§@W %aff?man%$1 SB: Hon’ble Shxi Manindra Mo 2.8.2010 Shri C.J.K. Rao, counsel t Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel 1, 2 8r. 4, on advanw copy. Shri Kasif Shakecl, cou copy. Heard on admission. This Court, in W.P.No.4 State 0f Chhmtisgarh & othe direcmd the Committee to con the disputed question of fact constituted by the State Gover 19-06-2006 passed in w.P‘ Chandrakar Vs. State Govemn and order dated 13~3-2008 E (State of Chhattisgarh and d another). Thus, this peu'tion is and order dated 31st Janualy, han Shrivastava, J. r the petitioner. Lawyer for the State] respondents No. ance of non—grant of retiral dues. This case pertains to grie nsion Committee. matter may ba mfen‘ed to the P 2/ 2004 (Bag'jnath Mandal Vs. The } and other connected matters, ider the matter of retrial dues as re involved. The Committee was nt, pursuant to the order dated No.1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai tent of Chhuttisgarh and others). tassed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 thers Vs. Baiinaih Manda! and squarely covered by the judgment 32008 passed in W.P.No.4642/ 2004 Sel for respondent No.3, on advance s n e e XI-HC—78 Wm m 200 mm(W) wm ammm WWW mwifwm '7” $aif<mm [(Baijnath Mandal (supran as ¥ submitted by leaned counsel appearing for the parties. This petition is accordingy disposed of? in the same terms i.e., the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a petiod of 15 days from the date of receipt‘of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner 1nd officers concerned within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, r aifording proper opportunit? > of hearing to the pétitioner. Praveen e petitioner and the ohicers concerned may hle additional d cuments, if necessary, The entire exercise, including payment if ally, petitioner, be completed within period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this 0 der. The petitioner shall supp one complete set of the petition to the State counsel as well as c unsel for the Accountant General retjral dues, to the f w " e h for transferring the same to the mmittee Sdl- " i i t Manindra Mohan Shrivastava t Judge