IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 219 OF 2008 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 219 OF 2008 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 219 OF 2008 State Bank of India ...Plaintiff vs. Rajguru Bhiram Vithal & Anr. ...Defendants Mr.Ashish Sabale i/b. Mr.Goenkar Law Associates for the Plaintiff. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : AUGUST 30, 2008 DATED : AUGUST 30, 2008 DATED : AUGUST 30, 2008 P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Heard Counsel for the plaintiff. He has filed affidavit of service dated 29th March, 2008. Inspite of service of summons, none appears on behalf of the defendants though they are served. The plaintiff has filed compilation of original documents. They are taken on record and marked Exhibit-A (Colly.). In view of the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 3(6)(a), the plaintiff is entitled for a judgment and decree. 2. Suit of the plaintiff is accordingly decreed in terms of para 21(a) with costs. 3. Suit, accordingly, is disposed of in the above terms. Rule of Court fees is permitted as per Rules. (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)