: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.455 OF 2002 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s Orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders ------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr.Ajay Kumar J. Panicker for petitioners CORAM : P.V.KAKADE,J. DATE : 22nd DECEMBER, 2004 P.C.: 1. By order dated 2.4.2004 the petitioner was permitted to delete the name of Respondent Nos.5,6 and 7. So far as other respondents are concerned, they are not served and therefore conditional order was passed. However, today it is brought to my notice that the Respondent No.1 as well as : 2 : respondent Nos.3 and 4 are served and therefore there is no question of paying Bhatta on service on them. The Respondent No.2 remains to be served. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to delete the name of the respondent no.2. Permission is granted. So far as Respondent no.2 is concerned the Petition stands dismissed. 2. Office objection for non compliance of the order stands waived. 3. Place the petition for hearing in due course.