IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (227LNo. g 1 03 12009 PETITIONERS 1. Smt. Vidyadevi Saraf, many qppL; can‘t: W/o. Lakhan Lal v Saraf, .1 1w 3 R/o. Kashyap Colony, Geetanjali Nagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil& Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.); Smt. Ramani Soni, W/o. Bhagwat Prasad Soni, R/o. Bhatapara, Gayatri Gas Agency, Tahsil- Bhatapara, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) Smt. Shivani Verma W/o. Dilip Verma, Via- S.K. Verma, House No. 31-A, Zone-2, M.P. Nagar, Bhopal, Distt.- Bhopal (M.P.) VERSUS /’1. Board of Revenue, Bilaspur, Through: its Chairman, Board of Revenue premises, Bilaspur (C.G.) /2. Smt.Mala Dubey,Wlo. Triyogi Narayan Dubey, R/o. Geetanjali Nagar, Near Bus Stand, Gali No. 6, Bilaspur, Tahsil & Distt.- Bilaspur\(C.G.)' /3. Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through: Collector B§Iaspur, Collectorate, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1) PARTICULARs // /3. M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petitiun (227’) No.31G9/2009 PETITIONER$ 1 Smt‘ Vidyadevi Saraf, W/o Lakhan Lal Saraf, R/o Kashyap Coiony, Geetanjaliw§$agan Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Biiaspur (6.6.) SmtRamani Soni, W/o Bhagwat Prasad Soni, R/o Bhatapara, Gayatri Gas Agency, Tahsil Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) Shivani Verma, Wio Dilip Verma, Via — S.K.Verma,‘, House No.31-A, Zone—2, MP. Nagar, Bhopal, District Bhopal (MR) Versus RESPONDENTS Boai'd of Revenue, Biiaspur, Through its Chairman, Board of Revenue premises, Bilaspur (0.8.) Smt. Maya Dubey, W/o Triyogi Narayan Dubey, R/o Geetanjaii Nagar, Near Bus Stand, Gaii No.6, Biiaspur, Tahsii and District Biiaspur (C.G.) Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through: Coiiector Biiaspur, Collectorate, Biiaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITKON UNDER §RTICLE 227 OF THE CON$TITUTION OF INDEA Appearance '. Shri Ravish Verma, Counsel for th‘e petitioners. Shri S.K. Mishra, Panei LaWyer for the State/respondents No.1 & 3. Shri Amrito Das, Counsei for respondent No.2 on Caveat Petition No.530/2009. 2 W.P.(227) No.6109/2009 ORAL ORDER (26.10.2009) $U_NIL KUMAR SINH Heard. Learned counsei appearing for the parties fairly submit that iwe Civii Suits are pending before the Civil Couri, in which, the titie in dispute has to be decided. A perusal oi the order passed by the Board of Revenue wouid show that an order of status quo wa atso granted in relation to the suit property. in view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permision to withdraw this writ petition. Permission granted. Accordingly, W.P.(227) No.6109/2009 is dismissed, as withdravm. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge X _~§\~ Sd/— A J. s s