IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33555 of 2008 RABINDRA PANDIT S/o- Tunna Pandit R/o- Village Jhamatapur P.O.- Sare P.S.- Sare (Asthawan) District – Nalanda Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.10.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offences under Sections 323 and 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no specific allegation against this petitioner and whatever allegation is made in the complaint is false. As a matter of fact, petitioner is always ready to keep the complainant decently as legally wedded wife. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits on perusal of the complaint that there is specific allegation against this petitioner who is the husband of the complainant with regard to the demand and torture. Besides the statement of the complainant on solemn affirmation with regard to the repeating of the demand and torture, petitioner is not entitled to privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the submission of the parties and - 2 - the materials brought on record, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the same is rejected. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)