r"i IN THE HIGH COURTOF JODIGATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w>p.N0.4<S3 / 2005 PetitiOBeF Versus ResDondents 1. '- ^^ ^y. .^'^^" ey 2. ' 3. ^ o. ^{gpy& Sttt.Ma^laAgapffaI, W/o Anu Agarwal, Aged about 36 Years, R/'o Bazar Para, Dharai^algarh, Tehsil - Dharamjaigarh, Dist: Raigarh-fC.G.) Smt.Sangeeta Ral, W/o i^rtCtdra Rai, AgcS afto'ut 31 years, E>haraia)aigar& €SoIony, TcKsil - DliaramjaigaTB Dist: Raigarb-iC.G.) ismt.AKtan W/'o Kurseed Khan, Age6aBout 37 yesa-s, ®, Tehsil-Dharaii^a^j^i, Dist: Jtei^rh-(e?.6.^ Snit.Sas^eta Bajga D/oBarKian Baiga, Aged about 39 cyars, R/o fetrapara.Dhgi'aiigai Tehsil - Dliaraiiijai^T&, Dist: Rai^TK-(C.G.{ Siat.Heera Bai, W^wKtiasiTam, .^ediabout 34 years, TeIisil-.Dharaiigai^rh, DisK; Raigai-ti-(C.G.) ^ Sm:E.AnjaiHiIVis&walEaEma W^o; Hffl-^aHl Vis&waleanma, Agetitscxntt'^^yeaTs,: R/S']|am^N(a^du-Ward, ^ : -. ©Iiaaai^ajgaffi, Tehsji: -iEiKaranyai^rh, 1 I3ist:Raigaill-{C?.G.r ^SiiK.GtiaiBlanaSahuy IW/o.JaspalSahu, A^d|aBout3oyeaTS, R^oTuiTapaEa DhaE'ang TelisiI-IKharamJai^Fh, Bist: ISaigaill-lC.G.t i (2) ,7. The Asst.Election Officer, Dharamjaigarh, TehsB - Dharamjaigarh, Dist'. Rfligarh-(C.G.) State af Chhattisgarh Through-Asst.Efeetion Officer, Dharamjaigarh, Tehsil -Dharamjaigarh, , Dist :Raigarh-(C.G.j WRTT PETn'K)N3JNDER ASTICLES 226 / 227 OF THE GONSTFTUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 ^.f..^M^\^.. tIK rfffiib*'l*lCTI^'ls*ftidpl^WR< ^Sli^TSII^BiiP^R^tB fi 07.9.2005 Shri Awadh JTripathi, cou|isei for the petitioner, Heard. The petitionfer has prefe 'red this petition unden Art-icie 226/227 of the Constitution of India bein(l Qqqrieved by the ordfer dctted 27.6.2005 \ 1 ^-'-^ ^ -' ^^. -T^ ~'"^; -^ ^"- ~ ~ passeci by ieamed B)istrict Juiclg|&, ftaigar-h. The case of the petitli election for the po^t of Preside^it, Nagar Panchcyat, DMaramJaigarh and she (pondent No.l herein questloned the election of petitioner by wdy of filing a^i eiection peti+ion unde^ Section 20of the !. . .-.. J s . ., .... i C.6. AAunicipallties |lct, 1961. S^mmonsofsaid petitiori wer-eseryed on the petitioner herein, she filed he 1 specific objectionjthat neces^ 1 pe+ition. Based ori that Issue preliminary Issue in view of The 20(4)(A) of -t-he Ac{ inwhich it tl necessary party of\the petition ner Is that The petitlpner contested the uifitten statement inj uihich she raised a 1 ary parties hwe not jbeenadded in the No.5A uias framed birj- that has no+ been decided as a prelimlnary issue. I have hear^ learned cou^isel fQr'thepe+itioner. Learned cou^sel for the jaetitioner submitt'ed t^at afrer framing of 1 . 1 ' ! I • Issue No.5A learn^d Ciis+rict J(id9e was required to d4cide that issue as a mandatory provlslons ^ontained in SecTion' as been incorporated t^drl-"wAo a^a//fce ^Ae l-iavin9 hear4 learned coy^sel for the petitioner, I hav< perused the record also. r XI-HC-78 it ^. •i:^f i^: .-es.tw-^^ issye. It istrue 1jhat byWay herein requested jfor framing necessary parl'ie^ in the petitj be decidecf as pr^iiminary issi) the Issue Nsi;5A <jmd fix the There is n^thing on l' ' ' has made any oral request to No.5A aa preiimi(iary iasue, wherein the requ4st made by Accordingiy, the petition dismissed. | Wouiever, t|ie petitioneit the District Judde and even decide the said ijssue aa prel Ifbertyto raise hi^grievance t|< nldtter reiord (f appticatlon dated 27.^.2005 the petltioner 1 f . • {}f iKlditibnal issue regaf'ding not arroying the '•i '. . ' « 1 • • |on and it was also Draypd that the said issue However, (earned Oistn'ct Judge fr-amed forevidence. ! which shows thtrtp-he petitioner herein ^ l|arned blstrict Judge ^or deciding the Issue I ' ' ' • ejs such there is no onler' before the Couri- 1 • - l'he petltioner has beenjshown to be refused. 1 dejserves +o be dismissed and it 'is hereby 1 i! ' .' uiill be at liberfy to raise this issue before 1-hereafter, if the &ist|rict Judge refuse to 1 minary issue then the pe+itioner wiill be at f t|efore the appropriate forum.