HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21840 of 2007 ORDER: Petitioner claims that she has purchased Acs.5.20 guntas of land in survey No.330 (P), 340 (P) and 341 (P) of Bachupalli Village, Ranga Reddy District in the year 1998. On an application made by her, Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, the first respondent herein, is said to have released final layout on 16-05-2006. The petitioner states that respondents 3 and 4 approached respondents 1 and 2 with a request to accord permission to construct houses on the basis of the sale deeds obtained by them on 17-12- 2003 and other deeds alleged to have been executed by the petitioner herself. The petitioner made a representation, dated 20-06-2007, to respondents 1 and 2 with a prayer not to accord permission to respondents 3 and 4. It was also mentioned that she filed O.S.No.369 of 2007 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District and that an order of status quo was obtained. She seeks direction against respondents 1 and 2 in the context for granting permission to respondents 3 and 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2. The petitioner had pursued the correct remedy in filing the suit for cancellation of the sale deeds upon which respondents 3 and 4 have rested their claims. As an interlocutory measure, the trial Court is said to have granted order of status quo. In this scenario, respondents 1 and 2 cannot ignore the representation made by the petitioner. They must take the same into account before any permission is accorded in favour of respondents 3 and 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing that respondents 1 and 2 shall take into account the representation dated 20-06-2007 submitted by the petitioner as and when the applications, if any, submitted by the respondents 3 and 4 seeking permission to construct upon the land in Survey Nos.330 (P), 340 (P) and 341 (P) of Bachupalli Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District are considered. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY 24th February, 2011 VJL/KDL