IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2653 of 2008 1. DUDHNATH PRASAD, SON OF LATE RAM SAKAL MAHTO 2. SMT. JANKI DEVI, WIFE OF DUDHNATH PRASAD 3. ANIL KUMAR PRASAD 4. ARUN KUMAR PRASAD @ ARUN KUMAR BOTH 3 AND 4 SON OF DUDHNATH PRASAD ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE CHACHOPALI, P.S. GOREYAKOTHI, DISTRICT SIWAN, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT MOHALLA NEW ROAD, DUJRA, P.S. BUDHA COLONY, TOWN AND DISTRICT PATNA 5. ANUP DEVI, WIFE OF JAIL PRAKASH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA TAKTAKPUR, NAI VASTI, VARANASI(U.P.) 6. MANORMA DEVI, WIFE OF HRIDYANAND PRASAD, RESIDENT OF BUDHA COLONY, NEW ROAD, DUJRA, P.S. BUDHA COLONY, TOWN AND DISTRICT PATNA 7. KUMKUM DEVI, WIFE OF VIJAY KUMAR PRASAD, RESIDENT OF NEW ROAD, DUJRA, P.S. BUDHA COLONY, TOWN AND DISTRICT PATNA 8. KAMLA DEVI, WIFE OF RAJA RAM PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAWADA, P.O. CHAINWA, P.S. CHAINWA, DISTRICT SARAN ----------DEFENDANTS IST SET PETITIONERS. Versus 1. RAM NATH PRASAD, SON OF LATE RAM SAKAL MAHTO 2. SMT. RUKMINI DEVI, WIFE OF RAM NATH PRASAD 3. SATISH KUMAR PRASAD 4. SANTOSH KUMAR PRASAD 5. PRAMOD KUMAR PRASAD 6. BINOD KUMAR PRASAD ALL NOS 3 TO 6 ARE SONS OF RAM NATH PRASAD 7. SMT SHARDA DEVI 8. SMT. PRABHA DEVI 9.GUDDI KUMAR 10. SMT. PARVATI DEVI NO.7 TO 10 ARE DAUGHTERS OF RAM NATH PRASAD ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHACHOPALI, P.S. G.B.NAGAR, TARWARA, DISTRICT SIWAN, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT GOUTAM BUDH NAGAR, TARWARA, DISTRICT SIWAN------------PLAINTIFFS/OPPOSITE PARTIES. 11. RABINDRA PRASAD 12. KABINDRA PRASAD BOTH NO. 11 AND 12 ARE SONS OF RAM SAKAL MAHTO, R/V CHANCHOPALI, P.S. GOREYAKOTHI, AT PRESENT GOUTAM BUDH NAGAR, DISTRICT SIWAN 13. RAJESHWARI DEVI, WIFE OF HARI KISHORE PRASAD, R/V AND P.O.SINGHOULI, VIA BASANTPUR, DISTRICT SIWAN 14. RAJKUMARI DEVI, WIFE OF RAMAYAN PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O. LAHEJI, VIA DAROUNDA, DISTRICT SIWAN 15. RAM PYARI DEVI, WIFE OF BALESHWAR PRASAD, R/V LAKO TOLA, P.O. GOREYAKOTHI, DISTRICT SIWAN 16. CHANDRABATI DEVI, WIFE OF LALAN PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BASANT CHAPRA, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ---------DEFENDANTS/PERFORMA OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 04. 20.04.2009. It is submitted on behalf of the - 2 - defendants/petitioners that defendant no.1 is suffering from cancer and appreciating such fact, the court below should be directed to expedite the hearing of the suit so that the same may be concluded within the life time of defendant no.1. Let the court of learned Ist Subordinate Judge, Siwan expedite the hearing of Suit No. 108 of 2008 and conclude the same, as early as possible, in any case within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. This contempt application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J)