IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 1782 of 2007 Between: M/s.S.B.Air Cargo, a registered Partnership firm under the Partnership Act, having their office at Kancherla Paradise Plot No.4A, 4th Floor, Rednam Gardens, Jail Road Junction, Visakhapatnam A.P., represented by its Managing Partner Mr.Syed Rasheed Basha, s/o Syed Habeeb Basha ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Divisional Railway Manager, East Coast Railway, Waltair Division, Dundaparthi, Visakhapatnam-4. 2 The Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, East Coast Railway, Waltair Division, Dundaparthi, Visakhapatnam-4. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ petition more particularly one in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents herein: a) To Act in accordance with the comprehensive parcel leasing policy circular No.12 of 2006, laid down by Government of India, Ministry of Railways (Railway Board bearing No.2006/TC(FM)/10/1, dt.28-03-2006. b) To direct the respondents to allot me (Registered Long Term Lease Holder) the parcel vans as laid down in comprehensive parcel leasing policy, Circular No.12 of 2006, laid down by Government of India, Ministry of Railways (Railway Board) bearing No.2006/TC(FM)/10/1, dt.28-03-2006 in all the trains, till the expiry of my lease period i.e., 30-05-2011 c) To direct the respondents not to entertain unregistered lease holders, registered lease holders, who got registered themselves after 31-05-2006 which is against the letter and spirit of comprehensive parcel leasing policy, Circular no.12 of 2006, laid down by Government of India, Ministry of Railways (Railway Board) bearing No.2006/TC(FM)/10/1, dated 28-03-2006 in all the trains, till the expiry of my lease period i.e., 30-05-2011. d) To direct the respondents herein not to break the comprehensive parcel leasing policy by taking law into their own hands, to act in accordance with law, not to infringe my fundamental rights and legal rights guaranteed to me by the Constitution of India and pass such other and further orders as are just and necessary in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MIRZA NISAR AHMED BAIG Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.R.S.MURTHY The Court made the following ORDER : It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. -------------------------------------- N.RAMAMOHANA RAO,J Dt : 10.3.2008 Knk ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RS}