IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50545 of 2008 AMIT KUMAR @ SONU S/o Shri Dinbandhu Prasad Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 24.02.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the statement of the deceased was recorded by the Police Officials even while he was under treatment, in presence of the informant. So, it is an admitted fact that she was completely under control of in-laws’ family, including petitioner. If the injury was due to burn by hot milk, that should be corroborated by the post-mortem report, but that is not so. Otherwise demand of torture and cruelty is there, though, reported months after her coming to the in-laws’ house. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail is rejected. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)