$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9450/2004 & CM APPL. 6747/2004 INDRAJIT DEB .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, Advocate. versus UOI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Mukesh Kr. Tiwari and Ms. Reba Jena Mishra, Advocates for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R % 02.09.2024 1. This writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, laying a challenge to the suspension order dated 24.03.20224. 2. In view of the developments that have taken place, post the passing of suspension order, learned counsel for the Petitioner fairly and candidly, on instructions, does not press the present petition as the same is rendered infructuous. 3. Petition stands disposed of as infructuous. Pending application also stands disposed of. JYOTI SINGH, J SEPTEMBER 2, 2024 DU This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/09/2024 at 12:29:14