IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17194 of 2010 ONKAR NATH JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.5413 of 2010 SUNIL KUMAR JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 30.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner-Onkar Nath Jha is Coordinator of Manager of Botanical Indian Laboratory Pvt. Ltd and petitioner-Sunil Kumar Jha is Zonal Manager of the said company, attached in marketing of Ayurvedic medicine. They are alleged to approach the informant to have business with the said company after appointing him consignee agent for which an agreement deed was executed. After some transaction informant’s substantive capital/cash was paid to the company through these petitioners which could not be returned back after accepting its receipt. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that if the allegation is accepted then also petitioners should be instrumental to bring the Managing Director, Surendra Saini and the informant to a platform who signed the agreement. Later both the 2 petitioners left the job of the company. Fixing the liability and fault of the company refusal of petitioners’ anticipatory bail cannot be justified. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 15 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)