IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.5009 of 2010 Ganga Sharan Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ----------- 3. 29.06.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the Opposite parties. A show cause is stated to have been filed on 24.6.2011 after serving a copy on the Counsel for the petitioner, but which is not on record. The office shall place it on record. From the copy of the learned Counsel for the State the Court finds from Annexure A that the representation of the petitioner has been considered. The contention of the petitioner with regard to inadequacy of the recitals in the order not disclosing details of the departmental proceedings and the vigilance report etc. contrary to the assertion in his representation is an enquiry which cannot be held in contempt jurisdiction. The remedy, if any, for the petitioner lies in a fresh writ petition only, if so advised. The contempt application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)