Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr. MMO No.66 of 2010 Dated of Decision: April 22, 2010. Than Singh and another. ..… Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. …. Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? Yes. For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajiv Jiwan, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Addl. Advocate General. Surinder Singh, J (oral): Heard. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing FIR No.115/09 pending investigation, registered under Sections 363, 366-A and 376 of the Indian Penal Code in Police Station, Theog against the petitioners. The contention of the petitioners is that this case was a counter-blast of the complaint filed by them in Police Station Dhalli, for manhandling the wife (petitioner No.2). Prima-facie the FIR lodged by the prosecutrix in this case disclosed the 2 commission of cognizable offence(s) and the investigation of the case falls within the total domain of the police, which cannot be interfered with at this stage, by exercising the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and otherwise also this case does not fall within the purview of rarest of rare case. As such, calls for no interference. The petition is dismissed in limine. Cr.M.P.NO.225 of 2010. Dismissed as infructuous. April 22, 2010. (Surinder Singh) (Pds) Judge.