1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7357 OF 2010 Vasant s/o Kishanrao Deshpande ..PETITIONER VERSUS The Maha. State Electricity Board and ors. ..RESPONDENTS CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 19th April 2011 PER COURT When the matter appeared before us yesterday, we pointed out to Mr S.R. Barlinge, learned Counsel who was appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner being employed as a Head Clerk with the first respondent would be a workman under section 2 (s) of the Industrial Disputes Act or, indeed, an employee under the MRTU & PULP Act. Mr Barlinge sought an adjournment to check this position, although he insisted that we should exercise our extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction in the matter. 2. Today nobody appears for the petitioner. 2 3. We are not inclined to entertain the writ petition in which the petitioner has challenged the order of termination from service. Petition dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum. ( S.S. SHINDE, J. ) ( SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. ) amj/wp7357.10