IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.971 of 2010 1. ANANDI KUMAR S/O SRI LAKHAN PRASAD R/O VILL.- MADANPUR (ALIPUR), P.O.+P.S. NARHAT DISTT.- NAWADA 2. RANJIT PRASAD YADAV S/O SRI SAMBHU PRASAD YADAV VILL.- RADHEBIGHA, P.O. KONIBAR P.S. NARHAT DISTT.- NAWADA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE D.G. CUM I.G. OF POLICE BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE D.I.G. OF POLICE, MAGADH RANGE, GAYA 4. THE S.P.GAYA CUM CHAIRMAN CONSTABLE SELECTION COMMITTEE, GAYA NAWADA 5. THE S.P. NAWADA ----------- 2 15.7.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing for the State. Petitioners' case is that in response to Advertisement No. 1 of 2004 they have also applied for their appointment on the post of Constables in the District of Gaya. In the physical test, they were declared fit by the Selection Committee and their names were published in the list of successful candidates on the notice Board. Their grievance is that persons having lesser marks than the petitioners were appointed but their candidatures were not considered for appointment. The posts are still lying vacant and till 2009 the respondents have considered the claim of persons like petitioners for appointment against the same vacancies which were 2 published through Advertisement No.1 of 2004. This application is being disposed off, considering the fact that the petitioners have already represented their case before the appropriate authority. The representations of the petitioners shall be disposed off by the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 i.e. Director General- cum- I.G. of Police, Bihar, Patna and the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Magadh Range, Gaya in case the same is pending before them giving reasoned order. In case the claim of the petitioners is there and the life of the panel is still existing, the respondents will consider the case of the petitioners. The writ application stands disposed off. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.kumar