IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Appeal From Order No.133 of 2010 Smt. Naruli Devi & another .…Appellants Versus Smt. Reeta Devi & others … Respondents Mr. Neeraj Uprety, learned counsel for the appellants. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Present appeal has been filed by the appellants challenging the award dated 06.03.2010 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/District Judge, Pithoragarh in M.A.C.P. No.30 of 2009, Naruli Devi & another vs. Sri Govind Giri Goswami & another. Learned counsel the appellants submitted that the certified copy of the award dated 06.03.2010 passed in M.A.C.P. No.30 of 2009 has not been annexed with the memo of appeal. He submitted that the Tribunal vide order dated 02.07.2009 consolidated the Appeal No.30 of 2009 with M.A.C.C No.72 of 2008. Both the cases were heard together but only M.A.C.C. No.72 of 2008 was decided. He further submitted that learned Tribunal in paragraph 25 of the 2 judgment passed in M.A.C.C. No.72 of 2008 has held that appellant is not entitled for any compensation and in view of this finding the appellants have preferred this appeal. Heard learned counsel for the appellants. From the perusal of the award dated 06.03.2010 it is clear that the claim petition of the appellants i.e. M.A.C.P. No.30 of 2009 has not been finally decided and only this much has been observed in the order dated 06.03.2010 passed in M.A.C.C. No.72 of 2008 that copy of the award passed in M.A.C.C. No.72 of 2008 shall be kept in the record of M.A.C.P. No.30 of 2009. Since no final decision has yet been taken in M.A.C.P. No.30 of 2009, the appeal is misconceived and is dismissed. (V.K.Bist. J,) 21.04.2010 Arti 3