IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9223 of 2010 UPENDRA YADAV S/O LATE BAUKU YADAV R/O VILL.+P.O.+ P.S.- CHAUSA, DISTT.- MADHEPURA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY 2. THE AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION COMMISSIONER NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 3. THE SECRETARY AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 4. THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE BIHAR, PATNA MITHAPUR FARM, P.S.- JAKKANPUR, DISTT.- PATNA 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE PURNEA 6. THE DISTRICT AGRICULTURE OFFICER PURNEA 7. THE JUNIOR PLANT PROTECTION OFFICER PURNEA, P.S.- SADAR, DISTT.- PURNEA 8. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL BIHAR, PATNA 9. THE TREASURY OFFICER null PURNEA ----------- 2 21.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Arshad Alam learned Standing Counsel No.4 appearing for the State as also the counsel appearing for the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though the Accountant General has sanctioned the payment of commuted value of pension to the tune of Rs. 1,45,973/- as per commutation payment order dated 22nd September, 2009 as contained in Annexure-1, the petitioner is not getting the aforesaid payment from the Treasury Officer, Purnea on the ground that the signature of the petitioner put before the Treasury Officer is not tallying with the signature sent by the department. Mr. Arshad Alam, learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in order to avoid the controversy let the petitioner go before the respondent no.7, the - 2 - Junior Plant Protection Officer, Purnea and put his signature in his present which shall be attested by respondent no.7 and sent to the Treasury Officer, Purnea for its eventual payment. It goes without saying that the respondent no.9 on receiving the signature of the petitioner dully attested by the respondent no.7 shall make the payment of the amount sanctioned by the office of the Accountant General. Considering the submissions of the parties, let the petitioner go before the respondent no.7 for doing the needful within a period of three weeks along with the certified copy of the present order and the respondent no.7 shall do the needful in the light of the above and sent it to the respondent no.9 within a period of two weeks thereafter. It will be open for the petitioner to make representation before the respondent no.7 for redressal of any left out grievance with regard to retiral dues. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations and directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)