IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3010 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1755 OF 2007 The CIT-2 .. Appellant V/s. Tata Electric Co., (AOP) ..Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.Dinesh Vyas with P.C.Tripathi for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & Coram : F.I.Rebello & Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ R.S.Mohite,JJ R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 26.02.2008. PC 1. There is a delay of 1310 days. Apart from that we find that question (A) is covered by the judgment of this Court in 159 ITR 28 in favour of the assessee and question (B) is covered by the judgment of this Court in 195 ITR 682 in favour of the assessee. 2. In the light of that, appeal dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)