( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.73 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.73 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.73 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.70 OF 2008 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.70 OF 2008 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.70 OF 2008 Mukand Global Finance Ltd. .. Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.A.S.Chavan for the applicant. Ms.Alpa Jhaveri, A.P.P. for the State. None for respondent Nos.2 to 4. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 4th June, 2008. DATED : 4th June, 2008. DATED : 4th June, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Mr.A.S. Chavan for the applicant. Ms.Jhaveri for the State. None for respondent Nos.2 to 4. 2. By this application, delay of 1 day is sought to be condoned. In my view, this is a fit case where the Court need not take steps to serve the copy of the application upon respondent Nos.2 to 4 as the delay pertains to only 1 day. The application sets out the reasons for delay of 1 day, namely, the mistake in calculating the period of limitation. Hence the order: a) Application is granted. Delay is condoned. b) Post the revision for admission on 18.6.2008. ( 2 ) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.)