IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15522 of 2011 1. Kedar Singh Aged About 66 Years S/O Late Narain Singh R/O Village- Susnar, P.S.- Aurangabad Muffasil, District- Aurangabad 2. Bindeshwar Ram Aged About 45 Years S/O Late Shakhichand Ram R/O Village- Manjhar, P.S.- Aurangabad Mufassil, District- Aurangabad 3. Surendra Singh S/O Late Indradeo Singh R/O Village- Jagdishpur, P.S.- Jamhore, District- Aurangabad Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Commissioner And Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 3. The Deputy Development Commissioner-Cum-Chief Executive Officer, District Rural Development Authority, Aurangabad 4. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad 5. The Block Development Officer, Block- Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad ---------------------------------- 2 12.10.2011. The petitioners who are P.D.S. dealers seeks quashing of the order dated 30.6.2011, passed by the Block Development Officer, Aurangabad, whereby they have been directed to refund the value of undistributed rice at APL rate which were lifted under S.G.RY. The petitioners submit that as indicated in the notice they had lifted 107 quintals, 275.60 quintals and 132 quintals rice respectively. It has been averred in paragraph 8 of the writ petition that petitioners have also deposited Rs. 50,000/-, Rs. 1,61,000/- and Rs. 75,000/- respectively. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct that if the petitioners file representation before the Block Development Officer, Aurangabad raising their 2 grievances, the same would be disposed of within ten weeks from the date of filing of the representation. Till then, no coercive steps would be taken against them. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)