:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 237 OF 2008 Shri Buvaji Krishna Toaskar ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ....Respondents Ms.G.K.Jadhav, Adv. for the petitioners. Mr.R.M.Patne, AGP for the respondents. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 23rd January, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. The petitioner had earlier submitted a Scheme under Section 20 Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 which was sanctioned with certain terms and conditions :2: :2: :2: be imposed. The terms and conditions having not been fulfilled, the Scheme came to be revoked. The land vests with the State Government. However, Ms.Jadhav appearing for the petitioner, submits that, the property being land locked, earlier the Scheme cannot be implemented. The petitioners are in a position to implement the Scheme. The petition therefore be entertained. 2. However, upon the legal position brought to her notice, she submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to approach the Competent Authority with a fresh Scheme. Needless to state, that if the petitioner approaches with a fresh Scheme, they shall duly consider the same without being influenced by the earlier order but in accordance with law. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Competent Authority with a fresh Scheme. SD/- *********