1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2312 OF 2002 President Vithal Revappa Ghante Mahatma Phule Gramin V.S. M. Bellamb and Ors ...Petitioners Versus Nirmala d/o Mahadeo Jawalgekar & Ors ...Respondents ..... Mr. Vivek Bhavthankar, advocate for the petitioner Mr. M.. Dharashive, advocate for respondent No. 1 Mr. J.S. Gavane, AGP for respondent No.2 ..... CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. DATED: 17TH AUGUST, 2009 PER COURT:- 1 Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. 2 The petitioner and respondent No.1 have placed on record compromise terms duly verified by the parties. For identification purpose, the said compromise terms are marked “X”. The parties are present in the Court. On query by the Court, they state that they have verified this compromise terms with free will and they agreed for the same. 2 Learned AGP for respondent No.2 submits that back wages are claimed therefore, the State cannot have any objection. 3 On query to the petitioner, Head Master Mr. Shankar Tatyasaheb Asbe state that already Education Officer has approved the bills of respondent No.1 as per clause 2 of this compromise terms. 4. In view of this compromise terms, the counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Thus, in view of the compromise terms the petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such. In case of any contingency arises the parties are at liberty to apply for clarification. 5. In view of disposal of writ petition, civil application No. 6598 of 2003 and civil application No. 6637 of 2005, are disposed of. *****