FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3730 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.294 OF 2009 (Sanjay s/o Abhimanyyu Parode Vs. The State of Maharashtra) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. Shri A.A.Mukhedkar, Advocate for applicant (appointed) Mrs. Vaishali More, A.P.P. for respondent ......... 1. Perused. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The applicant has preferred the present application for condonation of delay of 54 days in filing the accompanying Criminal Revision Application. 3. For the reasons stated in paragraph Nos.1 and 2 of the present application, the applicant has explained the delay caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Revision Application satisfactorily and the said delay does not appear to be willful, deliberate and intentional. 4. In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) thereof and delay of 54 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Revision Application stands condoned and the accompanying Criminal Revision Application be registered and listed for admission and present application stands disposed of accordingly. [SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.] Dated:22/03/2010 fmp/cri3730.09