IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17467 of 2009 Md. Khalil, son of Md. Hamid, resident of Village-Rampur, P.S. Dhoriya, District-Banka……………………..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ……………………………Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 20. 05. 09. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that anticipatory bail application of the petitioner was refused on 05. 10. 2007, vide Cr. Misc. No. 44568/07. Petitioner has renewed prayer for anticipatory bail on the ground that complainant/informant is in the habit of filing case under Section 376 of the I.P.C. He submits that she has filed one case under Section 376 of the I.P.C. on 5. 4. 08 against one Md. Azharuddin also. Learned counsel submits that some of the allegations made in the second F.I.R. is almost in same language as in the first case, in which the petitioner is an accused. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail. After considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is again refused. However it would be open to the petitioner to take the point that the complainant is in the habit of filing case under Section 376 I.P.C., before the learned Magistrate. With the aforesaid observations, this application is dismissed. m.p. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)