- 1 - 3.s.1282.11 skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.1282 OF 2011 Eros International Media Limited ..Plaintiff -Versus- Shree Ashtivinayak Cine Vision Limited & Ors. ..Defendants .......... Mr.Akshay Patil i/b R.M.Azim for the Plaintiff. Mr.Dhaval Deshpande i/b T. Jariwalla & Associates for Defendant No.1. Mr.Rajiv Narula i/b M/s. Jhangiani Narula & Associates for Defendant No.2. Mr.N.K.Mudnaney for Defendant No.3. Mr.Anant Mote, Deputy Manager (Legal) – Defendant No.5 present. .......... CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 8TH NOVEMBER 2011. P.C. 1 The suit is disposed of in terms of the consent terms dated 7th September 2011, signed by the authorized signatory of the plaintiff and director of defendant no.1 and their advocates, taken on record and marked ‘X’ as per order dated 4th November 2011. The undertakings contained therein are accepted. - 2 - 3.s.1282.11 2 The learned counsel appearing on behalf of defendant nos.1, 2 and 3 states that defendant Nos.1, 2 and 3 have no objection to the consent terms. 3 Defendant No.4 and his advocate are absent. A letter dated 28th October 2011 said to be addressed by defendant no.4 to the Secretary, Northern India Motion Pictures Association is tendered by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of defendant no.1. The same is taken on record and marked ‘X-1’. This letter was relied upon in support of the contention that defendant no.4 also has no objection to the consent terms. As defendant no.4 is absent, I express no views regarding the validity and genuineness of the letter. It is made clear that Northern India Motion Pictures Association will take its own decision itself, inter alia in respect of the said letter. Thus the consent terms in any event, will not affect, in any manner whatsoever, the rights, if any, of defendant no.4. 4 Mr.Anant Mote, Deputy Manager (Legal) representing defendant no. 5 states that defendant no.5 has a claim of Rs.1,50,00,000/- towards processing charges. It is made clear that this order does not affect the rights of defendant no.5 in any manner whatsoever. Defendant no.5 is at liberty to take such action as it desires including in respect of the prints of the suit film. - 3 - 3.s.1282.11 The suit is accordingly disposed of.