IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6257 of 2011 Randhir Singh @ Munna Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 4. 29.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 379, 279, 363, 302, 427 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that the informant’s son alongwith driver and cleaner went in the truck for loading of cement and tyre. The victim was in possession of Rs. 1,00,000/-. It is claimed by the informant that the informant’s son informed him that truck dashed one Bolero when 5-6 persons got down from Bolero and assaulted the son of informant and driver of truck and they took informant’s son and driver of truck on the Bolero. Subsequently the informant’s son was found dead. The accusation against the petitioner is that the informant named the petitioner on the basis of his conversation with son immediately after accident and the statement of cleaner. Cleaner’s statement is 2 recorded in paragraph no. 24 of the case diary where he claims that after he fleeing away from the scene after accident went to tea stall vendor who conveyed to him that the Bolero vehicle is of this petitioner. The said tea stall vendor has not been examined. The driver in paragraph no. 23 of the case diary has not alleged anything against the petitioner or identified the petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that with regard to ownership of Bolero vehicle or telephonic conversation after the accident between the informant and his son has not been verified by the Investigating Officer. This contention of the petitioner has not been controverted by the learned counsel for the State after going through the case diary. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 259 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like 3 amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M.(West), Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)