HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH Coram : HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. & HOM'BLE SHRS SUNSL KUIVIAR SSNHA, J. WRITAPPEALNo,16lOF2008 Appeliants Petitioners Respondents Respondents 1. Ramkishun, S/o. Shri Sudharam, aged about 70 years, Occupation Agriculturist, Tahsil Baioda Bazar, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Sewaram, S/o. Shri Ramkishun, aged about 35 years, Occupation - Agriculturist, Resident of Viilage Dhabadih, Tahsil Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. Smt. Rukhmani, W/o. Shri Sewaram, aged about 30 years, Occupation - AgricuJturist, Resident of Village Dhabadih, Tahsil Baioda Bazar, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 4. Nandlat S/o. Shri Chheduram, aged about 30 years, Occupation - Agriculturist Resident of Village Dhabadih, Tahsil Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary (Revenue), Department of Revenue, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Baloda Bazar, Tehsil Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 4. Officer in charge, Land Acquisition Branch, Baloda Bazar; Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 5. M/s. Lafarge India Pvt. Ltd. through its Generai Manager, Village : Sonadih, P.0. Rasedi, Tehsil Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 6. The General Manager, District Trade and Industries Centre Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 7. Chhattisgarh State Infrastructure Development Corporation, CSIDC, Raipur, Dist. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTtON 2(11 OF THE CHHATtiSGARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCWACT-200e Present: Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal & Shri Sudeep Agrawal, learned counsel for the appellants. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, learned Government Advocate for the State/respondents No. 1 to 4 and 6. Shri Bhaskar Payashi, learned counsel for respondent No.5. Shri Aayaz Naved, learned counsel for respondent No.7. ORDER (04th March, 2009) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: The appellants have filed I.A. No.01/2009, for grant of permission to withdraw the writ appeal. 2) By ailowing i.A. No.01/2009, the appetlants are granted permission to withdraw the writ appeal. 3) The writ appeal, therefore, is dismissed as withdrawn. nimmi Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge