IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CONTEMPT PETITION NO.144 OF 2007 Mr.Vishal Suresh Agarwal : Petitioner V/s. M/s.Natasha Industries & Ors. : Respondents ... Mr.P.N.Joshi for the petitioner. Mr.A.A.Garge for respondent nos.2 & 3. Mr.B.H.Mehta, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for respondent no.5. ... CORAM : S.A.BOBDE, J. DATE : OCTOBER 04, 2007. P.C. 1. There is no merit in the Contempt Petition. The undertaking given by the respondent is in respect of plot no.R-350, which is the suit property. It is alleged by the petitioner that one Gurdeep Singh has been inducted in the suit property. In fact, Gurdeep Singh appears to have been inducted in R-348 which is not the suit property. Said Gurdeep Singh has been given job-work by the respondent. There is no merit in the contention that because the respondent is said to be supervising the job-work, there is alienation of the suit property. 2. The Contempt Petition is dismissed. S.A. BOBDE, J.