1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4625 OF 2009 Manisha A. Kurade. .... Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents. Mr. S. S. Pakale for the Petitioner. Mr. V. S. Gokhale, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 3. Mr. Pratinidhi i/by Mr. V.D.Borwankar for Respondent Nos.4 and 5. CORAM: BILAL NAZKI and MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED : 1ST JULY, 2009. P. C.: The petitioner has filed this petition seeking directions against respondent Nos.1 to 5 to regularise the petitioner as an Assistant Teacher with effect from 1st October, 1997. For the same relief, a suit has been filed, which is pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Satara. Thereafter, some order came to be passed in the suit, which is challenged in a revision and the revision is also pending in this Court. Therefore, this writ petition is not maintainable at all. 2. The petitioner, however, submits that the writ petition was filed because in the revision following directions were given by this Court. "Heard. 2 Rule. Stay to the impugned order dated 24.8.2004. Liberty. This order will not come in the way of the respondent- employee to approach the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Satara with a representation for her absorption as a permanent teacher as per the M.E.P.S. Rules, 1981 and availability of permanent post in the subject concerned." Even if, these directions are not being followed and are not executed by the respondents that shall not give any fresh cause of action to the petitioner to approach the writ court by filing the present writ petition. At best, she can approach the revisional court for appropriate remedy. 3. The writ petition is misconceived and is dismissed as such. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.)