IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19655 of 2009 VEENA DEVI W/o Raj Kumar Yadav, Resident of Village- Asma Pauni P.S.- Ghaneshyampur, District- Darbhanga ---------------Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------------------Opposite Party ----------- 2. 16.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. F.I.R. is to the effect that informant’s daughter was done to death by petitioner and her family members for demand of dowry and causing of cruelty of its non fulfillment within seven years of her death. Submission of learned counsel is that informant later filed a petition to the effect that none of the family members had hand in killing his daughter and husband and father-in-law are facing trial and none of the witnesses examined till today is supporting the prosecution case. If this much of the circumstance can favour, the petitioner adverse circumstance is also there that is petitioner earlier moving Sessions Judge for anticipatory bail which was refused on 16.8.2008 but she remained waiting and remained away. In the meantime, two of the family members are facing trial and witnesses are turning hostile. Petitioner is adviced first to surrender and pray for regular bail, if the circumstance is shown by him can favour him, without being prejudiced by this rejection order The bail application is rejected. P. Kumar (Mandhata Singh, J.)