IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21256 of 2009 RENU DEVI @ SAUTILYA RENU DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 13.08.2009 Heard both sides. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to make appropriate correction in the address of the petitioner at page no.1 of the bail petition. Permission is granted. Sole petitioner seeks bail in a case initially instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Section 302 of the Penal Code. It appears that subsequently charge sheet under Section 306 of the Penal Code was submitted. Petitioner is the step-mother of the victim. She died in her ‘Naihar’. Allegation is that she was done to death in the home itself. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that informant admittedly is not an eye-witness. It is further submitted that in course of investigation, it has come that owing to skirmishes in the family between the deceased and the parents she consumed poison which ultimately caused her death. Learned counsel for the petitioner further highlighted that the father of the girl has already been privileged with bail. The case of the petitioner cannot be differentiated at this stage. In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner 2 above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M. Samastipur in connection with Patory P.S.Case no. 73 of 2008. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)