1 cri-wp-541-11 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 541 OF 2011 M/s. Guruashish Exim Pvt. Ltd. .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. A. M. Saraogi for petitioner. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for State. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D.SALVI, JJ. June 15, 2011. P.C. We have heard Mr. Saraogi the learned counsel for the petitioner-company and we have perused the affidavit-in-reply filed by Shri Ashok Ugale, Police Sub Inspector, Pydhonie Police Station, Mumbai. 2 cri-wp-541-11 As per the affidavit-in-reply filed by the PSI, the petitioner’s letter dated 26/6/2010 was forwarded by the EOW to the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone – II, Mumbai and subsequently marked to the affiant. In the said letter it was stated that one Shri Hitesh Ashar of M/s. Dhawal Enterprises was a broker and through him the petitioner purchased the licenses standing in the joint names of Mr. Nikhil Joshi and Mrs. Manisha Mukhopadhyaya. Subsequently it was found that the licenses purchased by the petitioner were, in fact, stolen licenses. However, the affidavit filed by Shri Ashok Ugale states that C.R. No. 58 of 2011 has been registered with the Poolpralhad Pur Police Station of Delhi and the petitioner also, vide its letter dated 16/8/2010, has approached the very same police station. It would be, therefore, appropriate that the petitioner should follow up with the Poolpralhad Pur Police Station of Delhi in C.R. No. 58 of 2011. Shri Dinkar Bhimaji Rokade, PSI, from Pydhonie Police Station, Mumbai is present before us and Shri Yagnik, the learned APP, on instructions, states that the enquiry papers will be forwarded to Poolpralhad Pur Police Station of Delhi in C.R. No.58 of 2011 so as to enable the petitioner to take further appropriate 3 cri-wp-541-11 steps in the said C.R. Petition is disposed off. (U.D.SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)