:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4920 OF 2004 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 474 OF 2003 ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4921 OF 2004 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.475 OF 2003 Unio of India at the instance of Assistant Director of Enforcement, Mumbai Mittal Towers, Mumbai ....Applicants. V/s Sureskh Kumar U. Jain & Anr. ....Respondents. Mr. R.F. Lambay, P.P. for the Union of India. Mr. A.M. Shringarpur, APP for the State. CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 8th December, 2004 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants. 2. In both these applications, applicants are seeking substituted service on the ground that respondent No.1 could not be served despite various efforts being taken by the applicants to serve notice upon him. It is, therefore, prayed that the applicants be permitted to serve notice by publishing the notice in two news-papers. :2: 3. Applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 4. All concerned to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the registry. V.M. KANADE, J.