IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19857 of 2010 Rameshwar Ram S/O Ganesh Ram R/O Vill.- Maura, Barahrup, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, P.O.- Barishpur, Distt.- Vaishali Versus 1. Phuljhariya Devi @ Sahagi Devi D/O Late Chalitar Ram, W/O Ganesh Ram R/O Vill.- Barahrup, P.O.- Barishpur, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, Distt.- Vaishali 2. Ramesh Ram S/O Ganesh Ram R/O Vill.- Barahrup, P.O.- Barishpur, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, Distt.- Vaishali 3. Meena Devi D/O Ganesh Ram, W/O Naresh Kumar Ram R/O Vill.- Khilwat, P.S.- Bidupur, Distt.- Vaishali 4. Veena Devi D/O Ganesh Ram, W/O Kamleshwar Das R/O Vill.- Daulatpur, P.S.- Sadar, Hajipur, Distt.- Vaishali 5. Ranju Devi @ Puja Kumari D/O Ganesh Ram, W/O Shiv Prasad Ram R/O Vill.- Mahua, P.S.- Bidupur, Distt.- Vaishali 6. Sanju Devi D/O Ganesh Ram, W/O Indradeo Das R/O Vill.- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, Distt.- Vaishali 7. Ganesh Ram S/O Late Damari Ram R/O Vill.- Barahrup, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, Distt.- Vaishali 8. Mulia Kuar W/O Late Fatinga Ram R/O Vill.- Bakhara Bujurg, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, Distt.- Vaishali 9. Uma Devi W/O Kamal Ram R/O Vill.- Mangarpur, Tana, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, Distt.- Vaishali --------------------------- 02/ 26.08.2011 Heard Mr. Bhubneshwar Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 1.9.2010 passed by the learned Sub Judge-4, Hajipur in Title Suit No 7 of 2005. The petitioner is the plaintiff before the court below and has filed the Title Suit in question seeking declaration that the defendant-respondent no. 1, Phuljhariya Devi @ Suhagia Devi whom he claims to be the second wife of the defendant-respondent no. 7 Ganesh Ram, is not Sundari Devi @ Sundeshwari Devi and that the properties mentioned in schedule-2 of the plaint do not 2 belong to the defendant-respondent no. 1 and that the sale deeds dated 16.2.2004 and 21.1.2004 executed by the defendant- respondent no. 1 impersonating as Sundari Devi @ Sundeshwari Devi in favour of the defendants-respondents third set be declared null and void. It so appears that during the pendency of the proceedings an application came to be filed by a person claiming herself to be Sundari Devi @ Sundeshwari Devi whom the petitioner claims to be the first wife of the defendant-respondent no. 7 and since expired in 1987, seeking to be heard in the suit. As there appeared to be a contest as to whether or not Sundari Devi @ Sundeshwari Devi, the first wife of defendant-respondent no. 7 is alive, the learned court below by the impugned order dated 1.9.2010 has accepted the petition so filed and has rejected the contention of the petitioner. I find no infirmity with the order passed by the learned court below. The writ petition is dismissed. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)