IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24248 of 2011 Anil Rai Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------- 03 23.08.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in para 8 of the petition within the course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 13.04.2011 in a case registered under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Neither the petitioner is named in the first information report nor anything has been recovered from his conscious possession. It would appear from perusal of the impugned order that name of this petitioner came in this case in the confessional statement of co-accused Amit @ Abhishek @ Avinash. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that co-accused Amit @ Abhishek @ Avinash has already been granted privilege of bail by learned Addl. Sessions Judge VI, Muzaffarpur vide order dated 5.1.2011 passed in B.P. no. 1581/2010. It is further pointed out by him that aforesaid fact was placed before the learned Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur but in spite of that the learned Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur rejected prayer for bail of the petitioner. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the - 2 - petitioner, Anil Rai, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate (West) Muzaffarpur in connection with Motipur P.S. Case No. 164 of 2010. Shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)