IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6984 of 2009 RAM BRIKSH YADAV, Son of Late Harihar Yadav, resident of Village- Milkipar, P.S. Rahui, District- Nalanda.......Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar.............................................Opposite Party. -With- Cr.Misc. No.6111 of 2009 RANJEET YADAV @ RANJIT KUMAR, Son of Ram Briksha Yadav, resident of Village- Milkipar, P.S. Rahui, District- Nalanda........Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar......................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 4. 05.10.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned counsel appearing for the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case under Sections 304B/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners are father-in-law and brother-in-law of the deceased. The allegation is that the deceased was given poison as a result of which she died. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the lady fell ill at her Naihar and she was taken to Doctor by her brother for treatment where she died. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the statement of the Doctor cannot be taken as concrete evidence in this case as the Doctor is a interested witness. The husband of the deceased is already in custody in this case and it is submitted that the father- in-law and brother- in-law can not be connected with the alleged occurrence as they are now residing separately since partition between the brothers. 2 Be that as it may, the petitioners Ram Briksh Yadav and Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjit Kumar are directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in connection with Rahui P.S. Case No. 185 of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Nalanda at Biharsharif subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)