IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-17231 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.11.2011. Bhag Singh ..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Ms. Puja Chopra , Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Nehra, Addl. A.G. Punjab, for respondents No.1 to 3 – State. None for respondents No.4 to 8. NAWAB SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that inspite of order dated November 27th, 2010 (Annexure P-2) passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patiala, whereby, application filed by the petitioner under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure was allowed and Station House Officer of Police Station Sadar, Patiala, was directed to “register a case and investigate the matter”, no action has been taken by the Police. 2. State has filed reply. For ready reference, paragraph No.2(j) of the reply reads as under: - “xxx xxx xxx (j) That in reply to the contents of para (j) of the petition, it is submitted that on receipt of copy of order dated 17.11.2010 it was reduced into writing vide DDR No.16 dated 16.12.2010 in the Roznamcha Police Station Sadar, Patiala and a detailed report giving reason for not registering FIR was submitted in the learned court. xxx xxx xxx” 3. In view of the reply filed by the State, no direction is required to be issued. 4. Disposed of accordingly. 17.11.2011 (NAWAB SINGH) neetu JUDGE