IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 26TH MARCH 2010 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 397 of 2010() -------------------------------- CRIME NO. 31/2010 OF PEROORKADA POLICE STATION ........................ PETITIONERS/ACCUSED : ----------------------------- 1. M.SAM DAVID RAJ, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.MOHANA CHANDRAN, ROHINI COMPOUND, OPP. L.J.C.BUILDING, PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SABU R.BABU, AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.K.BABU, PUTHUVAL PUTHEN VEEDU, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 011. BY ADV. SRI.G.SUDHEER RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT : ----------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY SRI. V. TEKCHAND PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/03/2010 ALONG WITH B.A.NO. 427/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T. SANKARAN, J. --------------------------- B.A. Nos. 397 & 427 of 2010 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 26th day of March, 2010 O R D E R Petitioners in Bail Application No. 397/2010 are accused Nos. 1 and 3 in Crime No. 31/2010 of Peroorkada Police Station, while the petitioners in Bail Application No. 427/2010 are accused Nos. 2 and 4 in the said crime. Petitioners seek anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324 and 308 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The Bail Applications were argued in detail on the earlier posting date. It was submitted that the petitioners are students and the de facto complainant is also a student. Time was sought for to explore the possibilities of a settlement. 4. It is now submitted that the disputes between the parties have been settled. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the de facto complainant and his father gave statement before the investigating officer narrating the incidents and stating that the disputes and differences between the parties have been settled. B.A. Nos. 397 & 427 of 2010 2 5. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that in these circumstances, the police do not have any intention to arrest the petitioners. The submission made by the learned Public Prosecutor is recorded and the Bail Applications are closed. The petitioners shall produce a copy of this order before the investigating officer. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE ln