IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 26 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 48 OF 2008 MR. LUIS OSCAR DE SOUZA AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus UNIT TRUST OF INDIA THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. M.S. Usgaonkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. I. Agha, Advocate for the Applicants. Coram:- P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. Date:- 21st January, 2009 P.C.: Heard the learned Senior Counsel for the applicants. 2. In my view, this petition cannot be entertained as the scope of review is limited as per Order 47 of CPC. The learned Judge while deciding the Second Appeal has considered this very argument canvassed before this Court in para 4 of the order which is under review. Even in a given case, if there is an error of law, that also cannot be a ground for reviewing the order. 3. This Court cannot sit in appeal over the judgment which is the subject matter of this review petition and in such cases, only remedy available to the applicants is to challenge the order before the higher forum and not by way of review petition. 4. In that view of the matter, this application is rejected. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. NH