3>:!S E;tii!;;tJ 55? .ft;_OA.:^i'jLit l^ sMasm Jtoolxes&ts &&SDoaaea1;si 0«A«iHb/612)/l994 sea of &SR BeMari Stdaa §5 yesrs, Oe tpati.oa - aeer, Pufelic Vorlss BBpartiaent, Mvision, Bls-fcriet - Burg, M.P* 1. ae State ot Mad&ya Pradesh arougtei ttoe Seeretayy ' Putilie Works Depaylaea Valla&fa BfaavaiB/HaepaliBJ1. tofbority 2. S^a<Aal Slagrigali ^rougst its Oaai.rmaa, Singarauli 5. %e EBglneer-tia-Qu.eft Pu'blie'Vor&s Bepartneat» Qavervse&t ofMa<teyaPradeA» Shoyal* M«P« 4. ae Qii.af Bsgi.Baer, Publie Voriss Bq?aFtasBC6, at ot Matoya Prade8h» BhepaltM .P. BETAILS OF .SPPLX CAQ:OH • KS l* 2. 3» ParticnalalE'B o£ aDDlieantS As given in Catise Title above. Particailars ®t•fce Be®OBdentss -do- EaF'tAeulars ©.Ett»eerder aaainst tdddti aaBlica'ti.oa l.a order tout he ApplieaR'fc is aot ••&, ig -Uiff par'y.ealsir •fce illegal aetien of -tsfae &e^ondeB'fc No 2.:£or note payiag flas salary Q£ "toe ^plican-t for •Qa.e period fron 7-5-87 te 9-9-87 and ottoer daes ®»dallewsnces (tariag ttie d%>tttatl.on period wader &e^>onde&t Bo.2, wtd.ie he was sent on deputatioa &r two years toy Bes^ondent Ko 4 -to Respondent No.&mder -^e Dept; ef RahafeiUtation & Bept under flie.Gbvtot M.P. vide erder ^ki^^;6iBMl5fSi R(Sy"s Stiffienaii!SBSEl ^ %^v 3TK51-^1^W 'SqT SiT^T sBtIW T" SB : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICI •g^r^tjl^iy^, ^•d1y'i<i, f°(CTi<"y MWWl ^hW«h ^.....,..WB..^...^4. •w^zoos' 31K?I •'RRT (ipf^eq) ^nwfltei sn^i aa^ifepfri Wffff ^ fe^'rfSf^R ^afflns)!^! heatrin petitic|ner 06.05.2009 None for fhe petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. On fhe last date of SPC was issued to fhe fhe petifioaer but uo fh.e petitioner. Accordingly, the prosecution. However, fhe Uberty cause stiUsurvives, he can Atvocate filfc PRITINKER DIWAKER for tlie State. i.e. on 01.04.2009, fixed date . SPC has already been sent to has been aiade onbehalfof represe4tation peti(ion is dismissed for want of wc^uld be with the petitioner iu case, suitable appUcation. 9^% itfr^^-C;FI3^<-^?»1=7^?TWl>"»*Wnn^< qfl*1 :%[;M^^K^^ WBi ^i^^^in^^^ ^^^is^^fSS§^9i'^siS.