IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 1247 of 2010 Date of decision: 25.04.2011 M/s Yakult Danone India Private Ltd. ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Puneet Bali, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shruti Jain, AAG, Haryana for the State. Mr. Rajbir Singh Sihag, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3. RANJIT SINGH J. The respondents have not filed reply. Mr. Sandeep Chawla, Deputy General Manager, Estate Division, Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation, Panchkula has filed an affidavit dated 13.12.2010, where he has stated that in principle the respondents have decided to withdraw the demand as raised in view of the anomalies pointed out by the allottees. It is also stated that the aforesaid demand for recovery amounting to ` 53,56,044/- stands withdrawn. The Corporation is likely to raise fresh demand containing the revised calculation on the basis of enhanced compensation. Counsel for the respondents have also pointed out the demand would be in the range of Rs. 36 per sq. meter approximately. Civil Writ Petition No. 1247 of 2010 -2- In view of this affidavit and the statement made by the counsel for the respondents, the present writ petition is rendered infructuous. The demand raised through the impugned notice would be deemed to have been withdrawn. The petitioner would be at liberty to have any appropriate remedy, in case, he is aggrieved against any fresh demand. April 25, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE