1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4616 OF 2007 IN APPEAL (L) NO.913 OF 2007 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2040 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.1808 OF 2006 Smt.Shakila Ansari & Anr. .. Appellants. Versus M/s.Ravinder Silk Factory & Anr. .. Respondents. Ms.Aarathy Thampy i/by Viraj Maniar Associates for the appellants. Mr.Piyush Shah for the respondents. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & J.P. DEVADHAR, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J. DATED : 11th January, 2008 DATED : 11th January, 2008 DATED : 11th January, 2008 P.C. : 1. Having perused the application and the affidavit in support and having heard counsel appearing for the parties, we are of the opinion that the delay of 54 days in filing the appeal has been sufficiently explained by the applicant. The delay primarily occurred because they received the copy late and after engaging another counsel, present appeal has been filed. No reply to this notice of motion has been filed. Consequently, the motion is allowed. Delay of 54 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 2 2. Notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 3. List the appeal for admission on 5th February, 2008. CHIEF JUSTICE J.P. DEVADHAR, J.