IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 2ND FEBRUARY 2009 / 13TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 3379 of 2009(B) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.KARUNAKARAN PILLAI, "PRIYAMANAS", PURANATTUKARA, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.DINESH MATHEW J.MURICKEN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT (REVENUE), SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, CHERTHALA TALUK. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, AROOR. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No.3379 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2009. JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner is that the tax in respect of the property covered by Exts.P1 and P2 is not accepted by respondents 2 and 3. According to the petitioner, in view of the above he lodged a complaint before the District Collector and thereupon by Ext.P4 he was asked to approach the Village Officer. Petitioner states that thereafter he made Exts.P5 and P6 before the 3rd respondent and that despite all this, orders have not been passed in the proceedings. Taking into account the above allegation of the petitioner regarding the pendency of Exts.P5 and P6 before the 3rd respondent, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to take a decision on the aforesaid complaints made by the petitioner, as expeditiously as WP(c).No.3379/09 /2/ possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/