,.^°r ^ IN THE HIGH CCURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION N0. ^^ OF 2001 BETWEEN Moti pam S/o Badhwa Ram aged about 45 years, K/o Village Botnidand Block Kunkuri District Jashpiir. EETITIQNER 1» A N D The State of Chhattisgarh^ through the Secretary Department of Forest"^ D.Ke Building^ Mantralay^ RAIHJR. Sub Divisional Officer<Forest) cum Prescribed Authority, Upper Ghat Forest Sxib Division, Jashpur Nagar, (c3-ihattisgarh} • ^•y. ^', ^A -'•• RE3PONDENTS ^,^^v-)...- sfyy ..t<'" ...^' CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WRIT %TITION UN.QER ARTICLES'226/227 OF THE -3F XI-HC-22 3Tr^T^T f<-ii<=h 'STT^T ^)<4i<=h ^f^a + "5'^T ^ll^l^q, ^Tli<H^(o, f®l<rtl^^< •W^iT•^qNr:P-;""I'229r/-2-0'01^ 209 "•^^""7""'""":"""""^' ^TT^I'^ITW^rf^r 18.9.2001 s ^te· <»Prashant Mishr.a ^4r^Deep Kesharwani The matter rslates trolley bearing registrat The dat.e of occurance is c^s'li!<rt<Tiri 4-ii*4<yii* ^ ft^ <r^^i< ^''STf^R-^T^T fQr ,the petitioner^ for the respondents». to seizure of tractor ,on No* M.P» 26-E-3588. 3.5.2001. The said tractor was seized when it was transporting certain logs .belonging to one Bud] that the writ petitioner i before the co.mpetent auth' representation is still p S^D'^O^ In. fact the petiti' on failure to get. necessa|ry remedy from the learned SDO<» The petitioner se the tractor <. Mr^ Kesharwani sta' be determlned by the Courfc at this stage may n< dings ®@@@@ pending befor' ^ibai^ar^idow^.It is contended tiad filed representatlon >ri.fcy on 11^6^2001^ The ^^ms ^nding fcefore the learned t>ner has approached. this court 2ks a direction for release of fces that entire matter should comp^tent authority and that fehis bt interfere with fche procee- fe the learned S.D^O^ ^ Mr^Prashant Mishraj sahmlts that at least this Court may direct interim Irelease of the said tractcx:, t On perusal of the jpleadings and after hearing ••2 r^A-^. -^£.»-^ i_^^ ^S^ T T 3?I^T^T '^NT'BT?^' '^?NrTrft^ 3ff^?T ^3^ ( ^q^^c^T ) 5:TI^T^^T^R°^T counsel for the parties this matter should be de authority^ In the result^thi^ with a direction that thfe immediately on receipt o| raatter on the basis of iricludlng fche question oj the "trac€oj? ' &i queatibn* of the writ petitioner be declded by the compte^t that it 1s for the compel pcayer interira or finat, not later than 1 month M ..L.-^ chS^fr-l4M>^T^i ^ 1^€tTt^f^R ^r^THTH^H^T ; am of the view that in deed •ermined by the competent petitiori is disposed of competent authority shoul/< thls order decide the entire r^presentatlOR pending before Xt interim or flnal release of Shrl Mis a sutamits that prayer ^ ^ iriter im^release should <v&s^^l"% authorityr I would only say ent authority to consider &ny The matter should be decided ffom th^ date of receipt of this <cder, _-.-—^^J_-_--——- •••^ Sd/- Chief Justice s^.-..