IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3322 of 2011 MD. GATHU @ ZAHID @ MD. ZAHID Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 15.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing has been recovered from possession of the petitioner and, as a matter of fact, he has falsely been implicated in this case when he failed to grease the palm of the police officials. It is also pointed out by him that the petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 18.07.2010 and so far as the antecedent of the petitioner is concerned, it is contended by him that petitioner has been remanded in one case which had been registered against unknown person and moreover, petitioner has already been granted privilege of bail in the aforesaid case. Taking into consideration the above stated submissions as well as facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Pothia (Kishanganj) P.S. Case No. 124 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )