:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 234 OF 2008 Prakash Pralhad Patil ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents Mr. V.T. Tulpule with Mr. Umesh Mankapure for petitioner. Mr. Ravi Kadam, Advocate General, with Mr. D.S. Mhaispurkar, APP for State. Mr. K.K. Singhvi, Senior Advocate, with Mr. A.P. Mundargi, Senior Advocate i/by Mr. Sudatta Patil and Mr.S.B. Shetye for respondent no.7. Mr. Nitin Jamdar i/by Mr. Vijay Killedar for respondent no.8. WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 628 OF 2008 Mr. Umesh Balasaheb Kalabhor ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents Mr. Sudhir Halli for petitioner. Mr. Ravi Kadam, Advocate General, with Mrs. A.S. Pai, APP for State. :2: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & R.Y. GANOO,JJ. B.H. MARLAPALLE & R.Y. GANOO,JJ. B.H. MARLAPALLE & R.Y. GANOO,JJ. Dated: Dated: Dated: July 04, 2008. July 04, 2008. July 04, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . In both these petitions, after the judgment was pronounced, Mr. Mhaispurkar, the learned APP, made an oral application to stay the operation of the orders for some time. We have noted that the trial in Sessions Case No.591 of 2006 before the Sessions Court at Pune is in progress and the trial in Sessions Case No. 41 of 2006 pending before the learned Additional Sessions Judge at Islampur has yet to commence. . Hence, the application for stay is hereby rejected. (R.Y. (R.Y. (R.Y. Ganoo,J.) Ganoo,J.) Ganoo,J.) (B.H. (B.H. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) Marlapalle,J.) Marlapalle,J.)