1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No. 356 of 2010 in Writ Petition No. 2806 of 2010 Shravan Ramkrishna Bhanarkar Aged about 39 years, Occu. Govt. Service, R/o Flat No.102, Pote Complex, Datta wadi, Nagpur. ........APPELLANT. ...VERSUS... Mrs. Nanda Shravan Bhanarkar, Aged about 35 years, Occu. Household, R/o C/o Lata Khushal Dhenare, Plot No. 8, Govind Gorkhede Complex, Seminary Hills, Nagpur. ........RESPONDENT =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==- Mr. G.G.Bade, Advocate. for the Appellant C ORAM : D.B.BHOSALE ; and PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATED : 28th July, 2010. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. By this Letters Patent Appeal, the appellant has challenged the order passed by the learned Single Judge, dated 21/6/2010, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant. The writ petition was directed against the order dated 26/2/2010, passed by the Family Court, Nagpur on the application (Exh.14) for interim maintenance. By this order, the Family Court has directed the appellant to pay 2 interim maintenance of Rs.2,000/- each per month to his two minor sons. Admittedly, the appellant is a government servant and drawing salary of Rs.36,908/-. He claims that there are deductions and his take home salary is Rs.8,720/- only. The deductions are towards the installment of housing loan and car loan. These deductions, in our opinion, are in the nature of investment by the petitioner and therefore, his claim that his take home salary is Rs.8,720/-, cannot be accepted. Having regard to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any reason to interfere with the order passed by the learned Single Judge. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE Diwale