IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3122 of 2005 GOURI SHANKAR MEHTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----- 5. 18.2.2010. Mr. Mrityunjay Prasad Singh No.2 learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Alok Kumar, learned Assisting Counsel to G.A.1 and Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel representing the Accountant General are present. The original petitioner had filed the writ petition for payment of his post retiral benefits and other retiral dues as set out in para-10 of the writ petition. By interim order dated 27.7.2005, the respondents were directed to make payment of lawful dues of the petitioner within a period of three months followed by counter affidavits giving details of calculation. It so appears that non-compliance of the order passed in the present proceedings, gave rise to M.J.C.No.1546 of 2009 which is pending before a Bench of this Court. Mr. Alok Kumar, learned Assisting Counsel representing the State submits that a show cause has been filed in the contempt proceedings and in which the respondents have demonstrated that the 2 entire dues as admissible to the petitioner has since been paid. In as much as that the admissible dues according to the respondents has already been paid to the petitioner and there is no rejoinder controverting the said position by the petitioner, the writ petition has become infructuous and is thus disposed of. The compliance or non-compliance of the order dated 27.7.2005 is a subject matter of the contempt proceedings and would be considered by the appropriate Bench hearing the contempt petition. The writ petition stands disposed of. ahk (Jyoti Saran,J.)