1 1. D.B.Civil Special Appeal(Writ) No.328/2009 Nanak Ram & anr. V/s State of Raj. & ors. 2. D.B.Civil Special Appeal(Writ) No.318/2009 Kulwant Singh V/s State of Raj. & anr. 3. D.B.Civil Special Appeal(Writ) No.320/2009 Baljeet Singh V/s State of Raj. & anr. 4. D.B.Civil Special Appeal(Writ) No.321/2009 Gaurav Singla V/s State of Raj. & anr. 5. D.B.Civil Special Appeal(Writ) No.323/2009 Kamalpreet Singh V/s State of Raj. & anr. 24.4.2009 Hon'ble the Chief Justice Mr.Deepak Verma Hon'ble Mr.Justice Prakash Tatia Mr.Girish Joshi ) Mr.Hemant Jain )-for the appellants. Mr.P.R.Singh for the respondents. Since common questions of law and facts were involved in all aforesaid appeals, they have been taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common order. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the record. Facts as appearing in D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.328/2009 Nanak Ram & anr. V/s State of Raj. & ors. would be taken into consideration. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court, respondents have submitted affidavit showing therein that none of the candidates, who had secured less marks than the appellants has been given admission in any of the Institution of his/her choice. List has also been annexed alongwith the said affidavit. 2 We have critically perused the said list and are satisfied that none of the candidates, who had secured less marks than the appellants has been given admission to prosecute his/her B.Ed. Course. Apart from the above, similar appeal being No.295/2009 had come up for hearing before this Court on 6.4.2009 and by a detailed order, the court was of the opinion that no case has been made out for interference against the impugned order passed by learned Single Judge. A copy of the said order dated 6.4.2009 passed by this Court in Appeal No.295/2009 be placed in the record of each file. Needless to add that appellants had approached the writ-court after completion of forth round of counselling, when they were not given admission in the Institution of their choice. Thus, on the ground of delay, learned Single Judge refrained from interfering with the matter. Thus, this appeal and connected appeals have no merit and substance and they are hereby dismissed, but with no order as to costs. A copy of this order be retained in the file of each case. (Prakash Tatia)J. (Deepak Verma)CJ Parmar