WPMS NO. 1422 of 2005 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Brief Holder for the State. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the opinion that no interference is required in the impugned order allowing the amendment application at this stage. The writ petition is dismissed and it would be open to the petitioner to challenge the order allowing the amendment application after the suit is decided by raising it ground u/S 105 of the C.P.C. in the appeal that may be filed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 06.07.2010 Shiv