23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LA. APP. 198/2011 KARAN SINGH & ANR Appellants Tliimgh: Ms. Smita Maan, Advocate " r versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Ramesh Ray, Advocate for UOI/R-1 Mr. S.K. Taneja, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Puneet Taneja & Mr. Anant Kumar " Sinlia, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN ORDER % 04.04.2011 I have heard the learned counsel for the appellants. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the learned Reference Court has decided the Reference of the appellants relying upon a judgment of this Court in "Bhule Ram & Others Vs. Union of India & Others", 170 (2010) Delhi Law Times 371 whereby a bunch of land acquisition appeals pertaining to village Aali arising of award no. 04/98-99 given by the Land AcquisitionCollectorpursuantto the notificationdated 31^' October, 1996 under 1 Section 4, of the Land Acquisition Act ^d has fixed the market value of the acquired land of the appellant at the rate of? 10,04,760/- per acre after giving 10% increase in the market value which had been determined in Bhule Ram's case since the notification under Section 4 in the present case was issued after about six months of the notification in Bhule Ram's case. Learned counsel has further submitted that the learned Reference Court was fully justified in following the judgment of this Court in Bhule Ram's case but the appellant has filed the present appeal since Bhule Ram's judgment of this Court is already under challenge before the Supreme Court and in case further enhancement is given by LA. APP. 198/2011 Page 1 of 2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified /• the Hon'ble Supreme Court the appellants would be deprived of the benefit of the judgment if the Reference Court's judgment remains unchallenged in his case. It is also contended that the appellants are now not seeking enhancement based on the other evidence adduced by them during the reference proceedings in the forai of some sale deeds Reference to which stands made in the impugned judgment of the Reference Court. In view of the aforesaid submissions having been made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this Court is of the view that there is no scope for entertaining this appeal now since even as per the appellants' own case there is no infirmity in the judgment under challenge. This appeal is accordingly dismissed in limine. P.K. BHASIN,J APRIL 04,2011/pg LA.APP. 198/2011 Page 2 of 2