IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2009 / 20TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 16015 of 2009(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. T.C.VAVACHAN, S/O.LATE CHACKO, AGED 54 YEARS, THURUTHIPARAMBIL HOUSE BRAHMAPURAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. T.C.PAPPACHAN, S/O.LATE CHACKO, AGED 56 YEARS, DO..DO... 3. T.C.JACOB, S/O.LATE CHACKO, AGED 44 YEAR 4. ANNAMMA PATHROSE, D/O.LATE CHACKO, AGED 62 YEARS, KUDILIMARIL HOUSE, PALLIMUKAL,BRAHMAPURAM P.O. 5. MARY JACOB, D/O.LAET CHACKO, AGED 60 YEARS, PUTHENANGADIYIL HOUSE, KANDANAD PO ERNAKULAM DT. 6. LEELA ABRAHAM D/O. LATE CHACKO, AGED 58 YEARSM IRICKAL HOUSE, MANAKKAKADAVU, KUMARAPURAM PO, ERNAKULAM DT. 7. SANTHA PAILY, D/O.LATE CHACKO, AGED 52 YEARS, KANIYATH HOUSE ,PUTHENCRUZ P.O.ERNAKULAM DT BY ADV. SRI.VARGHESE K.PAUL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM, KAKKANAD 2. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA) KOCHI CORPORATION, VYTTILA. 3. CORPORATION OF COCHI ERNAKULAM 682011, REP BY ITS SECRETARY. 4. R.D.O. MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DT 5. KOYA, S/O.LATE ABDUL KHADER, AGED 54 YEARS, MOOLEBHAGATH HOUSE, PERINGALA PO, ERNAKULAM DT. R3 BY ADV.SRI.RAMESH BABU, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.16015 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioners have a complaint that their properties have been left out of acquisition for a particular project of the Cochin Corporation. Learned counsel for the Corporation pointed that Ext.P7 representation of the first petitioner being pending before the District Collector, it would be appropriate to the District Collector to take a decision on that. Under such circumstances, without expressing anything on merits, it is directed that Ext.P7 will be taken up by the first respondent and a decision taken thereon in accordance with law, after hearing the necessary parties. Let that be done expeditiously. This writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.11/6.