HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BIUKPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 2733 olWSf Present; Petttioner Har Prasad Dhedhe Aged about 37 Yeare, S/o. Shri Nathu Ram Dhedhe Asslstant Teacher, &>vt, Prlmary School Dhangefpara (Sarvani), Block Khansia, Dtett. Raigarh (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarti, TTirough Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Ralpur (C.G.) 2. Tlie Dlrector Publlc Instruction Department Raipur (C.G.) 3. Distrlct Educatlon Oflteer Ralgarti District Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Block Educatiai CWIcer Kharsla (C.G.) 5. Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Ralgarh Distt. Raigarti (C.G.) Writ Betitfon undw Arttete 226 of Uie Constautjonoflndia Singte Bendi: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Mr. Anil Mourya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyerforthe Stat?/r®pondents. ORDER (Pawed on 7th Day <rf May, 2<W7) ^s 1. The quffitk)n of law Involved herein fe asto whether the petitioner Is enUtted to regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of friitial appointment or ftom the date of comptetton of probation pertod. 2. Leamed counsel appearlng for the petttioner as well as for the State/respondents jolnUy submit that the facte and quffition of law hvohred in the present writ petltion are thesame .- to ttiat of hi W, P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushll Tiwan and oUiers vs. State Govemment of Oihattisgarti & others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. 3. In vtew of the above-stated submisstons made by leamed counsel for the parties, the writ petiUon te altowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sufahash Sd/- .' Satish K.Agnihotri .: Judge - ,