Ti:r -~- m THB mOH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILA8PUR RESPONDENTS Writ PeUtlon No. Alc?'r /2003 Mohanunad Firoz Khan, S/o Late Mohamniad Safdar Khan, Aged about40 years, Occupation- Service, Presently Posted as Physieal Trainir^ Instructor, in Higher Secondary School, Tengarunada, District- Bilaspur(C.G.}. Versus - ^^t. State ofChhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, Tribal Developinent Department Mantralaya, D. K. S. Bhaw^an, Shastri Chowk, Raipur (C.G.). CoHunissioner, Tribal Development Department, Raipur(C.G.). Assistant Commissioner. Tribal Developnient Departaient, BUaspur (C.G.). Shri Ashok Sharnia, S/oShriM.L.Sharma, Presendy posted as Coach, In Games Area Guriikul Pendra Road,Distt. Bilaspur(CG) WRTT PETITOir VSIDER Aa.TtCIS 226/227 Or 'IHE CONSTrroTIGlBrorimUAFCUtISSUEANCEXMTAS'OTrABU; WRIT. ORDBR OR raRBCTIOnr TO DO JUSTICE m THE MATTSSSt. Detailsoffhe petition. 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETmQNER: As per cause title. (^ \CO\^' ^ XI-HC-22 •M : S^S ^i'iR)^H •"KSf9k 3;al^<wi<'t<<p«ol<.i<i<s,-fr<"iw*^ H11CTI (Bfl'B ^^^.^T^R:...'._^^^.__^ .M££:..&sl.^o^i^> ^...B.;;...^..^^^......-....^ Sno f«t'b<{tT" Slul Molid; Fuuz KIiaii Shri Vinod Shrivas. rcspondcnta 1, 2 and 3. I.A.N0.3J72/2004 for suiiuner vacatisn and LA.J arc allowrcd. Nib tieai'ing the case diirmg the ),3173/04 for urgent llearin? tlnb Heard. • Petitioner has fUed some officers who are jumos whereas he has not been petitioner subinits tlsiat representation before the s^ine has not been subiuits lliat llie Slale Itas i flirthersi]bniits:thatjfa dire authority/rcspondcnt at thia considered Having eonsidered ouinlon on the inents ot tti' Gourt, cnds ofjusticc will be detaDed the petitionerto make a gnevsmces befbre the respondent along wltli a cop^ '•yiflun a period of 13 day^ <*wf<"j<il'i wiaf 4te&^^R '^'3rf^t?3Ij^B' petitloiier 111 persoii. teva, Govt. Advocate for petition ort the groiuid tJiat to hiiii, liave beten promoted Iproniorea. uouiisei: .tor tne petitioner has made a (^mpetent authority, 'out the bv theni. He further it fllcd aiiy reply so. far. Hc rfjon js not given ro competent stagc, liG wHl ai.iffcr advcrscly. id without expressing any cUlU case, in the opinion of this jscrvcd tf a dircctipn is givcn to representation raismg Ms ccjmpetent autfaority of the of ifie petltlQri aad tliis orda anff on such represeatation [<i»^t S n 9 XI-HC-22 ^•a^•<li'sito«1,aiTttti'iiB, (»iw<»3<- ?a sn^T ^gg^ NWMI a>WI<0 "n 200 Ri'(»<a' ^ •1 'sfw ^ ^v -wvft ?«ti«8<tti^a l^f --L- authdiritv beirie laled, the coinpetent dccidc tlie same oii ils owii met as eany as possiNe prRferabIyl datc of rcccipt of thc rcprcscnt^ any grievance stlU remains, ttl' remedy available uhder the lawj With the aforesaid observt disposed of. Cioneequently, M.W.P.Noj disRQsed ot [ rity of the respondent ehall Its iii accordaiicc witli law withm six weeks from the tion. It is laadc clcar that if e petltioner may avall tlie bserv^tions, this pctition stands 1990/2003 aJso stands ^ 'sW^idl^tl't *IW^^ t^*<3 <Fa|<$K ^ 3rf5(PT 3II^f sd/- [Tlli-^^