1 wp2258.10 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2258 OF 2010 Mr.Shamsuddin Jamil Ahmed Ansari ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ....Respondents Mr. B.J.Sarwade, advocate for petitioner. Mr. A.S.Gadkari, APP for State. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:- JANUARY 25, 2011. P.C. 1. Inspite of order dated 31st August, 2010, Counsel for the Petitioner is praying for further time to produce some relevant decisions on the point in issue. As a matter of fact, in the order dated 31st August, 2010 tentative view has already been expressed about the plea taken by the Petitioner but indulgence was shown only because the advocate wanted time to do more research. 2. At this stage, Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the matter be taken up on 1st February, 2011. It is not possible to accede to this request. As no 2 wp2258.10 precedent has been brought to our notice inspite of indulgence already shown, Petition is dismissed in terms of order dated 31st August, 2010. (A.R.JOSHI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)