1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 20/2011 ( Harihar s/o Trimbakrao Wankhede .vs. State of Mah. Through PSO PS MIDC, Nagpur. ) with CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 26/2011 ( Subhash Roopchand Mangtani and one .vs. State of Mah. Through PSO PS MIDC, Nagpur. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr. Rohit Joshi, Advocate for Applicant in ABA 20/2011 Mr. A.S. Mardikar, Advocate for Applicants in ABA 26/2011 Mr. S.S. Doifode, APP for Respondent. Mr. R.R. Vyas, Advocate for Intervenor in ABA 26/2011 .......... CORAM : P.D. KODE, J. DATED : MARCH 11, 2011 Heard. For the detail reasons recorded in the orders dated 21.2.2011 and 27.1.2011 passed respectively on aforesaid applications, ad-interim direction was given in favour of the applicants regarding the arrest apprehended by them in connection with Crime No. M-1/2011 registered with Police Station M.I.D.C. Nagpur for commission of offence under Sections 120-B, 164, 193, 420, 465, 468, 471, 482, 483 and 486 of the Indian Penal Code, under Section 33-I of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, under Sections 51 and 63 of the Copy Rights Act and 103 and 104 of the Trade Marks Act. While giving the said direction, certain conditions were 2 imposed to ensure that the investigation in the said crime is not hampered due to same. Notice of the said applications was served upon the other side. The statement made by the learned counsel for the applicants of themselves having abided the conditions imposed and having attended the I.O. is not refuted by the learned APP. The prosecution has not filed reply. The applicant in ABA No. 20/2011 is the manufacturer while the applicants in ABA No. 26/2011 are the distributors. The learned counsel for the applicants stated that lodging of the complaint was outcome of the dispute arisen in between the parties in respect of transactions of manufacture and distribution of drug. It is urged that now differences arisen have been settled and the parties have also entered into memorandum of understanding. Having regard to the same there appears no propriety in keeping applications pending. Similarly having regard to no circumstance pointed out revealing any necessity of custodial interrogation of the applicants, the ad-interim direction given in favour of the applicants deserves to be confirmed for the same reasons for which same were granted. Hence the same is hereby confirmed with the modification that now the applicants will attend the I.O. when summoned by him by sending a SMS on mobile numbers which is to be furnished by them to the I.O. by tomorrow. Both applications stand disposed of. JUDGE halwai