1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7867 OF 2009 Ku. Monali d/o Sharad Kolhe, R/o-Near Ram Mandir, Varadsim, Tq-Bhusawal, Dist-Jalgaon. ...PETITIONER. VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 and others. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.A.I. Deshmukh Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri.R.P. Phatke, Additional Government pleader for Respondent No.1. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.U. CHANDWAL, JJ. DATE : 24TH NOVEMBER, 2009. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner. 2. The Petitioner claims to have secured more marks in the written examination but secured less marks in 2 oral interview. The Petitioner alleges that to favour Respondent No.5 - Pradip Pitambar Patil, in oral interview the marks were increased. The Petitioner was more meritorious than Respondent No.5. There are allegations against the management that they deliberately selected Respondent No.5. 3. These issues are not open now for the Petitioner, after participating in the selection process. The management, after holding interview, decided to select Respondent No.5. In exercise of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction, we are not inclined to entertain this Petition. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. [K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] asb/NOV09/wp7867.09