IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1789 of 2006 SMT.LALMUNI DEVI Versus KANHAIYA SINGH ----------- 2. 30.03.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This civil revision application has been filed by the defendant-petitioner against the order dated 15.7.2006 passed by the Munsif, 2nd, Gaya in Misc. Case No.6 of 2003 rejecting the application of the petitioner for calling for the original F.I.R. from the court of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar Gaya. This miscellaneous case was filed by the plaintiff for setting aside ex parte judgment and decree passed in the suit. The learned court below has observed that in the miscellaneous case there is no relevance of the first information report and, therefore, rejected the application for the petitioner. It goes without saying that the certified copy of the first information report can be proved and exhibited in the miscellaneous case during hearing of the matter. - 2 - In the circumstances, I do not find any merit in the civil revision application. This application is dismissed. B.T. (J.N. Singh, J.)