IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25885 of 2011 Sarju Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar -------- 02. 26.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 41/2011, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patnacity, is one of the named accused in this case instituted after roughly 16 hours of the occurrence with allegation of demanding Rangdari from the informant, who had purchased a house wherein construction work etc. was going on and he was returning from the place. Submission is that case has been instituted just to put undue pressure upon the petitioner. There is no explanation for such delay in spite of being police station at a distance of one K.M. from the place of occurrence. Moreover, petitioner has no criminal antecedent. If it is so, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the 2 above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patnacity, in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 41/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)