HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Bail Application No. 03 of 2004 CRIMINAL SIDE Daya Ram son of Sri Prem R/o Jogia Mandi, Haridwar P.S. Kotwali, Haridwar …..……. Accused/Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal ….…. Opposite Party Case Crime No. 943 of 2003 Under Section 386 IPC P.S. Kotwali, Haridwar By the court Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Sri Vivek Shukla for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. The counsel for the applicant submitted inter alia that F.I.R. in the case is belated one. Both the accused applicant and complainants having their shops at Mansa Devi Temple and there is business rivalry between the parties. Therefore, the accused applicant has been implicated in the case falsely. It has also been stated on behalf of the accused that the accused applicant is the only bread winner of the family and if he remains in jail any more the family will starve. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in my opinion, it is a fit case for grant of bail. Let the accused applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. 15.1.2004 (Rajesh Tandon, J.) *Dhyani