1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.344 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1394 OF 2009 Rafiq Karim Khatik through his wife Nasimabi Rafiq Khatik Applicant versus Divisional Commissioner, Nashik Respondent Ms.Sarojini Upadhyay, Amicus Curiae for petitioner. Mr.J.P.Yagnik, APP for State. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR AND P.D.KODE, JJ. DATE : 26th August 2011 PC : 1. This application is received through jail in disposed of Writ Petition No.1394 of 2009. By the said writ petition which was received through jail, the petitioner had made grievance about improper application of guidelines and not providing for certain deductions. That contention was considered and rejected vide order dated 24th August 2009. The Court recorded the contention of the Public Prosecutor that the decision has been taken in accordance with the guidelines. There is no changed circumstance for which the said opinion deserves to be reconsidered. The relief claimed in the present application is reiteration of the prayer in the writ petition. Hence, Criminal Application is rejected. A copy of this order be 2 forwarded to the applicant who is in jail for information. The Court expresses word of gratitude for the able assistance given by the Amicus Curiae for espousing the cause of the applicant. (P.D.KODE, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)