IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5713 of 2011 SANTOSH YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State. Petitioner is one of the named accused in connection with Murliganj P.S. Case No. 168/2010 for offences under section 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1-B)A, 26 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, whose name appears in the alleged oral dying declaration of the deceased made to his brother. The informant who arrived there on getting some information. No doubt, there is previous enmity between the two sides but it cuts both the ways. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, at this stage, I do not find it a fit case wherein privilege sought may be granted. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. Rajeev/ (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)