1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 10 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 10 OF 2004 Consumer Action Network (CAN) and anr. ... Petitioners Versus Union of India and Ors. ... Respondents None for the Petitioner. Mr. Hemant Sethi for R. No. 4. Mr. R.M. Sawant, Govt. Pleader for R. No. 2. Mr. N.D. Sharma for R. No. 1. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : MARCH 13, 2006 DATED : MARCH 13, 2006 DATED : MARCH 13, 2006 P.C. . The Petitioners had approached for a writ to direct Respondent No. 1 to constitute the authority to control and regulate airways as directed by the Supreme Court in Secretary, Ministry of Information & Broadcasting, Govt. of India and others Versus Cricket Association of Bengal and Ors. (1995) 2 Supreme Court Cases 161. The learned counsel for the Respondent No. 4 points out that the Telecom Regulatory Authority of 2 India has been constituted. . The other relief was not to broad cast certain matches in the year 2003-04. That cause of action no longer survives. None present for the Petitioner when the matter is called out. Petition dismissed. Rule discharged. No order as to costs. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)