C.Rev. No. 120 of 2010 13.12.2010 Present:- Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Addl. Advocate General for the petitioners. Mr. Rakesh Dogra, counsel for the respondent. CMP(M) No. 1221 of 2010 Not opposed. Delay condoned. The application is allowed. C. Review No. 120 of 2010 This petition has been filed for reviewing judgment dated 30.10.2009 passed in CWP(T) No. 236 of 2008 (OA No. 108 of 2008) on the ground that the respondent herein had completed eight years service on 31.12.2004 i.e. after the cut off date 31.3.2004. In the judgment dated 30.10.2009 this court has given the direction to regularise the respondent herein as Forest Worker w.e.f. 31.12.2004. The learned Additional Advocate General has stated that the respondent has been regularised w.e.f. 29.10.2009 in accordance with the policy of regularisation framed by the Himachal Pradesh Government vide letter dated 9.6.2006, according to which the stipulated cut off date for determining eligibility of 8 years of continuous service for regularisation is 31.3.2004. This was never the stand of the petitioner herein in CWP (T) No. 236 of 2008. On the contrary, the petitioners herein in CWP(T) No. 236 of 2008 have taken specific stand in the reply that the respondent herein had become eligible on 31.12.2004 as per the policy of the Government, his record was rechecked and it is found that the respondent was eligible/fit for regularisation w.e.f. 31.12.2004. This stand of the petitioners herein was taken - 2 - into consideration in the judgment dated 31.10.2009. There is no error apparent on the face of the record. In fact the judgment is based upon the stand taken by the petitioners in their reply in CWP(T) No. 236 of 2008. The petitioners herein now intend to take new plea of cut off date 31.3.2004 which was not their stand in reply to CWP(T) No. 236 of 2008. Moreover it is not the case of the petitioners herein that the plea now they intend to take is based upon discovery of new facts which were not in their knowledge when they filed reply in CWP(T) No. 236 of 2008. There is no merit in the petition. Accordingly, review petition is dismissed. December 13, 2010 ( Kuldip Singh ) (GR) Judge