IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9104 of 2009 MUNNA KUMAR @ NAVNEET KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 23.6.2009 Heard. The petitioner is an accused in a case under sections 307 and 120(B) of the I.P.C. and sections 25(1-B)A, 26,27 and 35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been implicated in false case and the production – cum –seizure list does not bear the signature of the accused petitioner. It appears that soon after firing the petitioner was apprehended and a country made pistol was recovered from his possession. The petitioner has confessed that he had taken contract to kill the informant. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after five months. Anilkrsinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)