IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’IVI‘ISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 3425 of2004 Peu‘tioners 1. Radhe Shyam Mahawar, Agcd about bl yeam, S/o Late. Chhotelal Mahawar, Occupation Business, Rio Naya‘para ward, Gokulpur Dhamtan', Tahsil & District Dhamtaxi (C.G.) Laxmi Narayan Sonkcr, Aged about 35 years, S] o iate Ruhel Sonkar, Councillor of Municipal Committee, Dhamatali, R/o Ram Bag Dhamtaxi, Tahsil & District Dhamtaxi (11.3.) 2. Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Nagariya Prashashan, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Collector and District Election otYicer, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) State Election Commission of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) President, Municipal Committee, Dhamtari (C.G.) 4. CO WRIT PETI'l‘ION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon’ble $1111 Satish K. Agnihotn’ J.) Shri J. S. P. Chandrasen, Advocate on the anthon'ty of Shir C. R. Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Vinay Halit, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents No. 1 to 3. O R D E R (Passed on this 12th Day ofAugust, 2008) 1. Learned counsel appealing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner seeks to WngdraW'tms peu'tion, as this petition has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents] State has no objection. In View of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as having become infructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge (0. ‘ Thakm‘