IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21739 of 2010 RAM PRAVESH SAH SON OF LATE FAUDAR SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SHAINI TOLA, P.S. BAKHTIYARPUR, DISTRICT- SAHARSA Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SMT. ASHA DEVI DAUGHTER OF PRITHVI CHANDRA SAH, RESIDENT OF PRIYA NAGAR, P.S SALKHUA, DISTRICT- SAHARSA, WIFE OF RAM PRAVESH SAH ----------- 7 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the opposite party no.2. It is submitted that the present complaint has been filed for ulterior purposes. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 submits that the allegations are specific with regard to demand and torture. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not feel inclined to allow the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is accordingly rejected. However, in case petitioner, on surrender, makes an application for grant of regular bail in the Court below, the same shall be considered on its own merit in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the present order. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)