W §qi$ snéar m (W) @ \ . .......... ‘ ... 111200 mermm mmw mm a2“ mam mm‘iwm $Wané21 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1 . AcCo1 Raipt 2. State Healt‘ Mant Colla Writ Petition UIA 22¢ VI 227 of the Constitution of India 8.3. HON’BLE SHRI DHIRENDRA MISHRA, J. 21.11.2008 ‘ Mrs. Hamecda Siddique Ms. Sharmila Singhai, Mr. Arun Sac, Govt. Ad ocate for the Stats. HeaHi. Grievance of the pet 31‘102003 while serving as reu’ral dues werc also settled daim of the petitioner for pay the satisfaction of the petition the above settlement. Howeve of Annexure P-l dated 13.8. ition S) No.6468l200 t 8 i Yadav, son of Punuram Yadav, aged 65 years, Occupation EX~Supervisor, in i1 Department, R/o Near Jagannath le, Baikunthpur, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh Versus mtant General, State of Chhatu‘sgarh, I(CC—) of Chhattisgarh, through ~Secretary, 1 Department, D. KS. Bhawan, talaya, Raipur (CG) Etor, District Raigarh (CG) , counsel for the petitioner. unsel for respondent No. 1. tioner in brief is that he retired on Supervisor in the Health Department. His at the n‘me of his retirement. However, the ment of provident fund was not settled to er. He made representation throughout for r, the respondent No. 1 vide memorandum 2007, informed the petitioner that as per \5 a @w; m §qi$ ‘. . . m 200 311w W mm) matmm ' mmmméa WWW'§%@W mmamw —u— 2f a; 31% Straw iinal calculation of his provide t fund account, there is negative balance of Rs.13,650/- . It is argued t at thc above iinding is based on wrong calculau'on . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she is not pressing this petition at this s e; however, she prays for libertyito the petitioner to make a fmsh rep sentation before the respondent No. 1 for redressal of his grievances lating to the claims of provident fund before the respondent No.1, w o may be further dixected to decide the representation Within the spec' ed period. Learned counsel for the spondent No.1 submits that in case the f1 petitioner mes nesh representation before the respondent No.1 within 15 days mm today along with copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondent No. 1 within a further period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation. In View of the above submission of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of with liberty to thepetitioner to file a nesh representation before the respondent No.1 for redressal of his grievances, within 15 days no today along with copy of this order. 0n such representan'on being ma e, the respondent No.1 shall consider and decide the same, on its o merits, in accordance with law, within a further period of two mo ths from the date of receipt of the representation. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge