IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.716 OF 2008 1. SURAJ NANDAN CHAUDHARY @ SURAJ NARAYAN CHAUDHARY, SON OF LATE BIKRAM CHAUDHARY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NARAYANPUR, POLICE STATION PIRO, DISTRICT BHOJPUR 2. HARE RAM SINGH, SON OF LATE PARSOTAM SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLGE JHAWAN, POLICE STATION BIHIYA, DISTRICT BHOJPUR, EX- MUKHIYA OF GRAM PANCHAYAT JHAWAN-BENWALIA …………………………………………………………………………..PETITIONERS VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ********* 4 06/04/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed challenging the order dated 25.08.2007 passed in Shahpur Police Station Case No. 107 of 2004 (G.R. No. 1870 of 2004/Tr. No. 3204 of 2007) by which the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara has taken cognizance for the offences under Sections 467, 468 & 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner no. 1 is the Halka Karamchari of Shahpur posted in the district of Bhojpur whereas the petitioner no. 2 is the Mukhiya who had recommended for the grant of caste certificate. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that as soon as the petitioner no. 1 came to know that the certificate is incorrect, he filed an application before the Circle Officer for cancellation of the caste certificate. The application for cancellation of the caste certificate 2 was apparently received in the Office on 05.01.2004. This Court at the stage of cognizance cannot go into the document which needs to be proved and brought on record at the appropriate stage of the case. I find no illegality in the order impugned. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. However, leave is granted to the petitioners to prove this document either by calling for the original document or by examining the Circle Officer concerned. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)