IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO. 214 OF 2008 NO. 214 OF 2008 NO. 214 OF 2008 IN IN IN NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1648 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO. 1648 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO. 1648 OF 2007 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 1253 OF 2007 NO. 1253 OF 2007 NO. 1253 OF 2007 Mr. Gajendra Singh ] .. Appellant (Org.Def.No.1) Versus 1. Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. ] .. Respondents and anr. ] (Org.Def.No.2/3) Dr. Virendra Tulzapurkar, senior counsel i/b M/s. Jehangir Gulabbhai & Bilimoria & Daruwala for the appellant. Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, senior counsel with Mr. Rahul Chitnis i/b M/s. PDS Legal for the respondents. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & R.V. MORE, JJ. DATED: 11TH AUGUST, 2008 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. An Affidavit has been filed by the respondent No.1 to demonstrate that there is a breach of injunction granted by the learned single Judge. We find that remedy under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure is available to the respondents and, therefore, the respondents are at liberty to follow the : 2 : said remedy. 3. We refrain to take cognizance of the breach of injunction at this stage. 4. Admit. 5. Interim relief not pressed. Sd/- Sd/- [R.V. [R.V. [R.V. MORE, J.] MORE, J.] MORE, J.] [S.B. [S.B. [S.B. MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.]