IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1859 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: September 24, 2009. Gram Panchayat, Sharakpur ...Petitioner(s) v. Shri A.S. Pannu, DC, Jalandhar & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: None for the petitioner. Shri M.C. Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. ORDER Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): The grievance of the petitioner before this Court is that respondent No.5 is in illegal possession of the property in dispute and despite the fact that the order passed under the provisions of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act and the Punjab Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act have become final against him, he continues to be in possession of the plot in dispute. The petitioners in the writ petition, who are members of the Panchayat of village Sharakpur filed a representation to the Deputy Commissioner, Jalandhar with a prayer that illegal possession over the shamilat land be got vacated and despite that no action was taken and, thus, in these circumstances, the petitioners approached this Court by filing CWP No.6208 of 2008 which was disposed of vide order dated 11.4.2008 directing the Deputy Commissioner, Jalandhar to expeditiously decide representation of the petitioners dated 19.2.2008. In response to the show cause issued by this Court, reply by way of affidavit of Shri A.S. Pannu Deputy Commissioner, Jalandhar, has been filed wherein it has been submitted that proceedings for eviction of respondent No.5 and others have been initiated against them in accordance with law and order Annexure R-1 has been passed on the representation of the petitioners in compliance of the orders passed by this Court. In view of the aforesaid facts, as mentioned in the written statement and that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, I am not inclined to proceed further in this petition. Rule discharged. September 24, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge