IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2011 / 15TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 320 of 2011(L) ------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- MATHEW, S/O.THOMMAN, ULLATTIL HOUSE ELANGULAM VILLAGE, ELANGULAM KARA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.LIJI.J.VADAKEDOM RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT KOTTAYAM, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, KOTTAYAM 686 001. 2. TAHSILDAR KANJIRAPPALLY, TALUK OFFICE KANJIRAPPALLY PO, KANJIRAPPALLY 686 507. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER ELANGLULAM VILLAGE OFFICE, KOORALI PO KOTTAYAM DISTRICT 686 522. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 320 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 5th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, pursuant to Ext.P2 judgment, he made Ext.P3 application to the 1st respondent. It is stated that based on Ext.P3, 1st respondent has initiated action for sub dividing the property and assigning separate survey number. In this writ petition, what is sought for is a direction to the 1st respondent to expedite the proceedings. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, such proceedings for sub dividing the property pursuant to Ext.P3 are pending, it is directed that the 1st respondent shall conclude the same as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. 3. Needless to say that any such proceedings shall only be with notice to the parties concerned. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp