1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO.42 OF 2010 _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office } Memoranda of Coram, } Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's } orders or directions } and Registrar's orders } ___________________________}___________________________________ Mr.V. D. Rakh, AGP for the appellants. ...... [ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. ] DATE : 19th January, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned AGP. For the purpose of orders to be passed in the appeal, the service upon the respondents or calling of record is not desirable. The appeal is finally disposed of at the admission stage. 2. The State feels aggrieved by the enhancement of award in respect of the acquisition of 47 R non-irrigated land belonging to the claimants, whereby Special Land Acquisition Officer granted Rs. 4230/- (Rupees four thousand two hundred thirty) as the price of land while Reference Court made it Rs.8,460/- (Rupees eight 2 thousand four hundred sixty) thereby making additional compensation payable by the State adding Rs.4,230/- (rupees four thousand two hundred thirty) with consequential benefits. 3. Before the learned Reference Court, there were sale instances of showing sales at the rate of Rs.18,000/- and Rs.27,000/- which were given in earlier L.A.R. No. 96/1987. The Reference Court considering the situation of the property under acquisition which was identical part of acquisition of land in earlier Reference No. 96/1987. The order under challenge does not display any infirmity seeking inference. There is no perversity in passing the award. The appeal lacs merits, hence dismissed. No costs. [K.U.CHANDIWAL ] JUDGE gas/fa42.10