IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 1277 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: February 10, 2009 Baikunth Nath Goyal & Sons Stells (P) Ltd. …Petitioner Versus Assistant Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Fatehgarh Sahib and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA Present: Mr. Kumar Vishav Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Piyush Kant Jain, Addl. AG, Punjab, for the respondents. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that order dated 3.2.2009 has been complied with and TIN number of the petitioner has been opened. Accordingly, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous as the TIN number has been opened. Ordered accordingly. However, we make it clear that the TIN number of the petitioner should not be locked for the same reason on the basis of which it was earlier locked. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (H.S. BHALLA) February 10, 2009 JUDGE Pkapoor