IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6496 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO DHIRAJBHAI KARSHANBHAI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MM PARMAR for MR PH PATHAK for Petitioners No. 1-3 GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 1 MR JR NANAVATI for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 18/07/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT Shri J.R. Nanavati, the learned counsel for Porbandar Nagarpalika - respondent no.2, states that the petitioners have been regularised by the order of the Industrial Tribunal and the petition has become infructuous. The petition is, therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous. Rule discharged with no order as to costs. Interim relief stands vacated. ******* hki