IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1514 of 2007 Gopal Lal Versus Jagdish Sao & Ors ----------- 3. 23.11.2011 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. It appears from the order sheet that earlier also on the ground of no appearance, this application has been dismissed for want of prosecution. Today also nobody has appeared when the case has been called out. However, from the perusal of the impugned order it appears that the Court below has rejected the prayer of the petitioner for taking some documents in evidence. This order appears to be interlocutory in nature and the Civil revision application does not appear to be maintainable. However, it would be interest of justice that the petitioner be granted an opportunity for converting this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, in view of the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar, reported in 2010(2) PLJR 954. The petitioner is granted four weeks time to convert this revision application into an application under 2 Article 227 of the Constitution of India failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to the bench. Kamlesh (V. Nath, J.)