1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION No. 3897/2010. Kishor Manohar Gujar -VERSUS- Returning Officer, Selu, Wardha and others. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : JULY 06, 2011. Heard Shri M.D. Lakhey, learned Counsel for petitioners, Mrs. Joshi, learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2, Shri R.D. Bhuibar, learned Counsel for respondent nos. 5 to 7, 11, 13, 17, 19 to 21, Shri P. Marpakwar, learned Counsel for respondent no.22 and Shri V.L. Jaiswal, learned Counsel for respondent no.4. Limited grievance made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is, initially when results were declared, total votes cast in ward were incorrectly 2 shown. That error was later on corrected. He contends that in ward no.4 when total votes cast were 3136, initially its number was shown as only 1169. According to him, thus there was an error in not showing about 60% of the votes cast. He therefore, states that the petitioner will be satisfied if this correction of error is duly notified by the respondent in any newspaper having wide circulation. Respective learned counsel appearing for respondents are pointing out that the grievance of petitioner has become infructuous. We find that the grievance of petitioner on merit has been rendered infructuous. His demand for publication in newspaper is unwarranted and petitioner is not pointing any prejudice caused to him because of absence of publication of such correction. Hence we are not inclined to interfere in the matter. Petition is, thus rejected. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Rgd