IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.4282 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 21.7.2010 Ram Mehar ....Petitioner Versus Om Pati and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.C.B.Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. There is no infirmity in the impugned order. The petitioner wished to summon a sitting District Judge and a person who was attached as a Reader to him, when he was functioning as a Sub-Judge and in that capacity had passed a decree. The fact was deceptively concealed in the averments in the petition while an impression was given that some official witnesses were required to be produced, prompting the court to pass an order on 12.5.2010 in C.R.No.3121 of 2010, which are orders passed routinely to enhance substantial justice, when litigants are confronted with orders of the trial court, closing the doors of procedure on them. The court however, restrains its hands on commenting upon the conduct of the counsel for the petitioner. C.R.No.4282 of 2010 (O&M) -2- At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the instant revision petition. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. 21.7.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss