IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 59 OF 2005 M/S DAMU DATTA NAIK KARMALI REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI BHASKAR D.N. KARMALI,CURCHOREM GOA ... Appellant Versus SHRI VAMAN VISHRAM KHANDEPARKAR, MOLLEM GOA AND ANR ... Respondents Mr. P. A. Kholkar, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 1st November, 2007 P.C.:- Learned Counsel on behalf of both parties present. The parties have settled their dispute regarding the amount which was due by the Respondent No.1 to the Appellant towards the bouncing of the cheque. It is stated by the learned Counsel on behalf of both the parties that all payments have been made including the one which was required to be made on 30-11-2007 as per application filed on behalf of both the parties dated 28-1-2007. In view of the above, nothing survives in this appeal. Learned Counsel on behalf of the Complainant seeks leave to withdraw the Appeal. Leave granted. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.