(Spl.-H.C.A.S.,C.D.,78-e) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 365 OF 2004 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Note, Office Memoranda of Quorum, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s Orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S. G. Dessai, Senior Advocate with Mr. D. B. Bhise, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P. K. Rele, Senior Advocate with Mr. Girish Sardessai, advocate for the respondent. CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATE : 9th December, 2004. P.C.: Heard Mr. Dessai, learned Senior Counsel with Mr. Bhise, advocate, for the petitioner Union and Mr. P. K. Rele, Senior Advocate with Mr. G. Sardessai, advocate for the respondent Company. The impugned Order passed by the Tribunal declining to extend the benefits of the settlement dated 16th January, 2003 unconditionally does not call for any interference. 2. However, Mr. Dessai, learned Senior Counsel, on instructions, states that the Union requires about two to three weeks - 2 - time for the individual workers to submit the declaration as set out in Annexure 6 to the Memorandum of Settlement and on submitting of the said declaration, the employer would extend the benefits of the settlement dated 16th January, 2004 to such workmen. Mr. Sardessai has no objection for granting three week’s time and if the declarations are submitted within the said period of three weeks, the benefits of the settlement would be extended to those workmen who submit the declarations. 3. The petition is, therefore rejected and the Union is given three week’s time to submit the individual declarations. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. mc.