Civil Revison No.609 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revison No.609 of 2010 Date of decision:29.01.2010. Surjit Singh ...Petitioner Versus HDFC Bank Limited and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Munish Behl, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the interests of justice will be served and he will be content if a time bound disposal of the stay application is ordered. The stay application is presently listed for consideration on 24.02.2010 before the learned Trial Court. The respondents, the learned counsel informs, did not enter appearance on 18.12.2009 inspite of service. Inspite thereof, the grievance proceeds, the learned Trial Court neither granted the ad interim order nor declined the plea. It is further averred that the learned Trial Court ordered the issuance of notices afresh to the respondents without any justification. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Authorized Signatory, Retail Asset Collections has issued communication Annexure P-1 disabling the plaintiff-petitioner from operating his salary account. In the circumstances of the case, the learned Trial Court Civil Revison No.609 of 2010 -2- would consider the feasibility of preponing the matter to the first week of February 2010 and dispose of the stay application eitherway during that week itself. The acknowledgment (of copy of this order) issued by the concerned Judicial Officer shall be forwarded to the Registry of this Court. Learned District Judge shall himself maintain a tab to ensure that the stay application is disposed of by aforementioned date. January 29, 2010 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE