1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2024 of 2010. Sau.Aruna Rathi Edu. Institution, Amt. ..vs.. The Akola Municipal Corporation and anr. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.M.I.Dhatrak Adv. for the petitioner. Mr.C.S.Kaptan Adv. for respondent no.1. Mr.M.M.Agnihotri Adv. for respondent no.2. C ORAM : D.B.BHOSALE AND PRASANNA B.VARALE,JJ. DATED : 5th August, 2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for setting aside the order of allotment of tender work dated 10.3.2010 issued by respondent-Corporation for computerized assessment of taxes by making survey and getting the computerized information available of all properties (lands and buildings) within the limits of the Corporation. The petitioner has further prayed for direction to the Corporation to accept the tender rates submitted by the petitioner, which are lower than the rates quoted by respondent no.2. Mr.Kaptan, learned counsel for the respondent – Corporation has placed on record a communication 2 dated 28th of July, 2010 issued by the Deputy Commissioner (Development), Municipal Corporation, Akola, stating that they have decided to cancel the tender process and initiate a fresh. His statement is accepted. In view thereof, nothing further survives in the writ petition. Hence, the petition is disposed of. If the respondent – Corporation issue fresh tender, it is open to the petitioner and respondent no.2 to participate in the said process. JUDGE JUDGE. chute