IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19273 of 2010 SATISH YADAV, S/o Late Judge Yadav. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 05.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution case is that five persons fired at the deceased but only one fire arm injury was sustained by him. However, considering that it was the petitioner who was demanding extortion from the deceased before his death and he was murdered on such count, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case shall not be bifurcated for purposes of this order. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)