IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST AUGUST 2011 / 9TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23599 of 2011(Y) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ SUBRAHMANIAN NAMPOOTHIRY. K.K, GOKULAM HOUSE, KURICHY P.O., KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.ANEESH JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY, KALAMASSERRY, ERNAKULAM, PIN-673 635. BY ADV. SRI.S.P. ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI, SC., ADV. SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/08/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 23599 of 2011(Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FORM FOR REVALUATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2(a): COPY OF THE FEE RECEIPT DATED 03/08/2011. RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).23599/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 31st day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioner applied for revaluation of 3rd semester B.Tech supplementary (Electronics and Communication) Examination vide Ext.P1 application and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondent to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within six weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. 4.Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs