IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13121 of 2008 RAM NANDAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 14.5.2010 After having heard Shri Md. Farooq Ahmad Khan, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, what appears to this court is that the whole procedure adopted by the petitioner seeking release of the tractor which was claimed by him as his was against the provisions of Chapter VI-C of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In a case where prayer is made for release of attached the properties and the same being rejected, the petitioner shall have to prefer an appeal in the light of section 86 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. If that appeal is also decided against the claimant, then he can come in this court in revision. The time which might have been consumed in between the rejection of the petition for release and filing of the appeal, is condoned. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)