rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1212 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1212 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1212 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1129 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1129 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1129 OF 2008 Santosh Ramesh Barga .. Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.Ashok G.Toraskar for the Applicant. Ms.A.T.Javeri, A.P.P.for the State. CORAM : A.S.Oka, J. CORAM : A.S.Oka, J. CORAM : A.S.Oka, J. DATED : 20TH JANUARY, 2009 DATED : 20TH JANUARY, 2009 DATED : 20TH JANUARY, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned advocate for the Appellant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The Applicant (Accused No.2) has been convicted for an offences punishable under section 325 of the Indian Penal Code. The substantive sentence is rigorous imprisonment for three years. Advocate for Applicant states that fine amount has been deposited. 3. It is not in dispute that during the pendency ( 2 ) of the trial, Applicant was enlarged on bail. Considering the pendency of very old appeals in this Court, this Appeal is not likely to be heard before the period of sentence is over. Considering all these aspects, a case is made out for grant of bail. 4. Hence, the application is disposed of by passing following order : :: O R D E R :: :: O R D E R :: :: O R D E R :: i. The Applicant shall be enlarged on the same bail on which he was enlarged during the pendency of the trial subject to filing fresh bail bonds within four week from today. (A.S.Oka, J.) (A.S.Oka, J.) (A.S.Oka, J.)