... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.519 OF 2006 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.910 OF 1997 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Smt A.P. Pandya h/f J.J. Shah for the Applicant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 20, 2006. : JUNE 20, 2006. : JUNE 20, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Perused the Application. The explanation offered in the Application is not acceptable. However, in the interest of justice, as the litigant should not suffer for the default on the part of the Advocate, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) on condition that the Advocate on record shall pay costs to the High Court Legal Services Committee quantified at Rs.750/- within one week from today, failing which Application will stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the court. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE