THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.22018 of 2010 ORDER: According to the petitioner-Insurance Company, respondents 5 to 9 have filed M.V.C.No.477 of 2007 before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Bangalore, claiming compensation for the death of one Hanumesh. On 28.09.2006, while the said Hanumesh was going on a motor cycle along with one pillion rider by name Srinivas and when they reached Gavirangappa’s land, a lorry bearing registration No.KA-09-A-5046 came in a rash and negligent manner and hit the motor cycle, as a result of which, Hanumesh died and the pillion rider suffered injuries. The third respondent registered a case in Crime No.48 of 2006 under Sections 337 and 304(A) IPC. A couple of days later, it was reported in the local press that there are strong doubts regarding the death of Hanumesh. But, however, the police did not investigate the said crime in that angle, simply treated the death of Hanumesh as accidental one and filed charge sheet against the driver of the offending lorry and the same was numbered as C.C.No.90 of 2006 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Madakasira. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though they made representation dated 01.04.2008, followed by reminders dated 18.08.2010 and 22.10.2008, to the second respondent to look into the matter, the second respondent through letter dated 10.09.2010 rejected his request on the ground that the matter is pending trial before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Madakasira. After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of the Court to permit the petitioner to approach the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Madakasira by filing appropriate application for reinvestigating the case. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to avail the remedy of filing application, as available to it under the law. No costs. __________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 05.10.2010 va