IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.14406 of 2011 Pintu Kumar @ Pintu Singh, S/o Vijay Singh. Versus The State of Bihar ---------- 03. 02.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 386 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 17.05.2010 since there was an allegation against him of firing at the informant for reasons of demand of rangdari. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail on the ground that he is in custody since 26.09.2009 and there is no sufficient progress in trial. When a report was called from the Trial Court it is reported that in the present case charges were framed on 10.02.2009 and all forms of summons were issued to the witnesses despite which they are not appearing. Considering the period of custody and he has fair antecedents, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Masaurhi in 2 connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 53 of 2005 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)