IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY, TWO THOUSAND TEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3890 of 2010 Between: K. Rami Reddy … Petitioner And The Commissioner of Police, Government of A.P., Hyderabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: None Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Home This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3890 of 2010 ORDER:- This writ petition is fled for a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not providing police aid to the bailiff to execute the warrant issued in E.P.No.79 of 2005 in O.S.No.2602 of 2002 on the file of V Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. I have heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home and perused the record. The petitioner obtained a decree for declaration of title and recovery of possession in O.S.No.2602 of 2002 on the file of V Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, against one R.Narayana. The petitioner filed E.P.No.79 of 2005 for execution of the said decree. The civil Court issued warrant of execution and in view of the resistance put up by the judgment debtor by locking the premises, the executing Court passed order dated 13.11.2009 directing the Station House Officer, Musheerabad, Hyderabad, to provide police protection for execution of the warrant. The grievance of the petitioner is that in spite of the said direction, respondent No.3 has not provided police aid. This Court, by order dated 22.02.2010, directed respondent No.3 to extend necessary police protection to the bailiff for execution of the warrant. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submitted that respondent No.3 will extend necessary police protection for execution of the warrant. This statement of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for is placed on record and the writ petition is accordingly disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.5072 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 11.03.2010 ES