IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11265 of 2009 1. BABLU KUMAR, SON OF SRI NARESH KUMAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MANIYAR CHAK, P.S. MUFFASIL, DISTRICT MUNGER. 2. KRISHNA MURALI KUMAR, SON OF SRI BHUBNESHWAR PRASAD DAS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHAGAT CHAUKI, P.S. MUFFASIL, DISTRICT MUNGER. 3. JITENDRA KUMAR SON OF SRI RANBIR MANDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KALARAMPUR, P.S. MUFFASSIL, DISTRICT MUNGER. 4. SANJEET KUMAR SON OF SRI JOGINDRA MANDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MANIYAR CHAK, P.S. MUFFASSIL, DISTRICT MUNGER. 5. PRABHU PASWAN, SON OF SRI JAGDISH PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MANIYAR CHAK, P.S. MUFFASSIL, DISTRICT MUNGER. 6. BHOLA PRASAD, SON OF MADAN PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SISWANIA, P.S. UCHKAGAON, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ---RESPONDENTS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE S.P. SARAN. 4. THE S.P. MUNGER. 5. THE S.P. BHOJPUR. 6. THE COMMANDANT, B.M.P.-20, DUMRAO, BUXAR. 7. THE CHAIRMAN CONSTABLE SELECTION BAORD SARAN DISTRICT THROUGH S.P. SARAN DISTRICT. 8. THE CHAIRMAN CONSTABLE SELECTION BOARD BHOJPUR DISTRICT THROUGH S.P. BHOJPUR DISTRICT. 9. THE CHAIRMAN, CONSTABLE SELECTION BOARD, MUNGER DISTRICT THROUGH S.P. MUNGER DISTRICT. 10. THE CHAIRMAN CONSTABLE SELECTION BOARD B.M.P.-20 DUMRAO, THROUGH COMMANDANT B.M.P.-20 DUMRAO, DISTRICT BAXUR ---RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02. 01.09.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners were the applicant for the appointment on the post of Constable in the light of Advertisement No.01/2004 and 02/2004. It is submitted on their behalf that they appeared in the physical selection test and became successful but were not called for verification of their certificates and testimonials. It is further submitted that posts advertised have been kept vacant yet the petitioners and others have not been considered for such appointment. 3. Let the petitioners represent before the Chairman of the Selection Board before whom they appeared and participated in the selection process and the Chairman of the Selection Board shall consider their request for appointment in terms of their merit position in the panel - 2 - prepared pursuant to the selection test. If the case of the petitioners for appointment on the post of Constable is not considered then the Chairman of the Selection Board shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law giving reasons as to why petitioners have not been appointed, as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt of the representation along with a copy of this order. 4. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)