(2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0w^ /20Q6 PETITIONER ^•?5ft .....•'-^^:-%l^-'rf ^^-$1^- RESPONDENTS »•- Arun KumarTandiya Age about 40 years, AssistantTeacher, S/o Late Shri P. L. Tandiya, Govt. School, Sidesar, Block - Kanker, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS 1. StateGovernmentofChhattisgarh Through:- Secretary, Education Department, ^ D.K.S.Bhawan,Raipur(C.G.) ,/'%-/i 1 <2. Distrlct Education Officer -<-^ Kanker(C.G.) 3. BlockEducationOfficer Kanker(C.G.) 4. Joint Director (Treasury/Accounts) Jagdalpur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ..'* /" sinsie Bench ishl'?^ Shfl ^siljRh K- .Annih^ti ^ST S SS 9 "^ffTtit itB-tt^ ff ll i ^a j?'"t.'L^a 5 B 1; B ^^ ^ •^a^.-S1 Vv'. P. (SlNo.7378 iS P^UHiSSli •¥- A^u °./ State of Chhattssgarh and others. i, counsei Tor ffie peiitioner Shri Somkant Verma, Sh.ri An.4nd Dubey, Panel Lavyer for the State/Respondents. •th^ ffil ^-, ^,^'^i 1. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner as vvell as for the State/respondents jointly submii that the facts of the present writ petition are similar to that of in W.P. (S) F'jo.5976/2006 (Sushi Tiwari and others 'v's. Stats Govt. of Chhattisgai'h & Others), which was aiiowsdvide order dated 07.11.2006. They further subm:: that the question of law involved is aiso the same. 2. In view of the above stated submissions made by iearned counsel for the pai'ties, the wrlt petition is ailowecf in terms of the order dated 07.11.2006 passed by this Couri In W.P.(S). No.5976/2006 (Sushii Tiwari and others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & Others), No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge