IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.44668 of 2010 Suresh Mehta, Son of Rameshwar Mehta, Resident of Village Mirjawa P.S. Tribeniganj, District-Supaul. …..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the State : APP. ---------------------------------- 05/ 19.10.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner’s prayer for bail has been rejected earlier. A report has been called for and from the report it appears that five out of ten witnesses have been examined. Learned Counsel for the informant submits that I.O., two more witnesses are to be examined and the informant is assisting the court in earlier disposal of the case. The petitioner was seen talking with the informant’s daughter at 8 p.m. Subsequently, her dead body was found. The girl was aged 16. In this view of the allegation prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has annexed the entire deposition of the informant and has submitted that the 2 informant has tried to improve his case in course of trial and so his deposition is doubtful. In the present case, the girl aged 16 years was killed and the petitioner was seen talking with her prior to her death. Considering the allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the above named petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is again rejected. However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial. kksinha/- (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)