} HICH coURT OF CHEATTISGARH AT BILA§PUR 1 WRrr PETITION (S) No 5111 of'aoos Asmsh Kumar Ktx‘ldeep Slo Keshav Ram Kuldeep aged about 21 years, R/o Sanjay Nagar Village Dondl Lohara J D1smct Durg (CG) r .; VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1 State of Chmmgam through Secretaxy L 1 Panchayat & Rural Development DKS Bhavan, IMantralayg Rmpur 2 (CG) 2 D1str1ct Educatlon Otiioer,Durg (CG) 3 Chsef Executwe OEmer, Janpad’ 1 , . Panchayat Dond1 Lohara, D1stnct Durg- » "" { (CG) PETméNER § WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA i I ' ‘ ‘ SB. Hon’ble Shri SanshKAw girl. r ‘ Present. Smt Hamlda S1dd1que, Advocaté tor the petmoner M P S Bhana, Deputy Government Advocate for the Shn State/respondents 1 and2 . r v ‘ T L ORAL ORDE (Passed on 15m day of September, 2008) 1 1. - By This petition, tho petitimer challenges The orde; datod 06.08.2008 ' ’(‘Annexurq P/l) wheTeby the appointment ofthe pegitionenon the poS} of ‘r j Shiksha Kanni Grade Ill has been cancelled on 04.082008, by TesolnTion R:- ofthe Janpad Panchayat, Dondilohara, Durg. j '2. The appoimment and service conditions of Shiksha Kaifmis are governed by the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Shiksha Kanm (Rectuttment ané Conditions of Services), Rules 2007 (for short ‘the Rules, 2007)». Rule ‘ 13 of the Rules 2007 prowdes for statutory appeal against any oréer‘ passed under ihe Adhmlyam. . . \ ’ \ ( \ I y 3. I Once the law has been settled by this Court 1t 1s necessary that the e petitioner, 1f aggteved by termination, should take recourse te altemanvei .2. statutory forum i.e. appeal under the provision§ of Rule 13 of the Rules, A , A 2007. The épetitioner has approached this Comt wilthout taking rocourse to aiteruative statutory remedy available to hlml'llhs is not one ofthe caee wherein the High Court should interfere in exjiercise of its power under 3‘ Articie 226 of the Constitution of India, making departure £‘om the 1" nomial rule of availing alternative statutory; provisions §rst, before coming to this Court. Thus; this petition is not maintainablevon the groenq of§availagbilitky of alternative statutory remedy under the provisions of Rules, 2097. . ~ The petition is accordingly dismissed. However, liberty is‘reser/ved to the petitioner to take recourse to altemative statutory remedythat may be available to him, if so advised. No order asto costs. Consequently, LA. No. 1, application for grant of ad—interirn relief, also stands disposed of. ‘3