1 cp322.sxw ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTEMPT PETITION NO.322 OF 2010 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.169 OF 2009 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.A.A.Garge for the petitioner Mr.A.M.Sethana a/w Ms Navina Kumari for the respondent CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 15,2010 P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. Affidavit in reply discloses that though belatedly, on 24th February 2010, a decision has been taken by the concerned Authority. The learned counsel for the petitioner complains that the decision has not been communicated to the petitioner. Affidavit in reply proves the substantial compliance with the directions issued by this Court. A 2 cp322.sxw true copy of the decision has been annexed to the reply. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the decision, the remedy of the petitioner is different. 2 In view of the substantial compliance, no case is made out for initiating the contempt proceedings. Petition is disposed of. JUDGE