WP.10304-10 - 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 10304 OF 2010 Asiya Khatoon Akbal Ahmed Shaikh & Anr. ...Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents *** Mr. R. D. Mishra, for the Petitioners. Ms. Aparna Vhatkar, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. S. G. Surana a/w Yogesh Bandal, for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4. *** CORAM: V. M. KANADE J. DATE : FEBRUARY 10, 2011 P.C. . The grievance of the petitioner in this petition is that the Competent Authority has held that petitioner is not eligible to get permanent alternate accommodation and this order has been confirmed by the Administrator & Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Division, Mumbai. It is submitted that there are sufficient documents available to the petitioner to prove that she is entitled to get an alternate accommodation. The remedy for the petitioner is to go before the SRA WP.10304-10 - 2 - by filing an appeal. If such an appeal is preferred by the petitioners before the SRA, the same be decided on merits and in accordance with law within a period of 6 weeks from today. The petitioners shall vacate the premises which they are in occupation and shift to the alternate transit accommodation. Respondent No.3 shall, however, not demolish the structure till the SRA decides the application filed by the petitioners. In my view, since the alternate accommodation is provided and the SRA is directed to decide the application, that will be filed by the petitioner, it is not necessary to interfere with the impugned orders passed by both the authorities below. Writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in the aforesaid terms. Respondent No. 3 shall give transit accommodation if available, or otherwise, the petitioners shall be given cash component in lieu of transit accommodation. [ V. M. KANADE J.]