IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5819 of 2009 MRS.NIKHAT YASMIN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 12.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 19.12.2007 removing him from the post of Panchayat Shikshak holding that his appointment as Shiksha Mitra itself was bad. It is submitted that the matter stands covered by an order of this Court in L.P.A. No. 940 of 2007. Learned counsel for the State urges that the petitioner has an alternative remedy before the Appellate Authority constituted by the State Government. This Court considers the alternative remedy more efficacious and expeditious. Considering that the Appellate Authority has been constituted District wise and shall have the benefit of original records of the case, if the petitioner claims to have been covered by an order of this Court, the Appellate Authority shall consider that aspect of the matter also and dispose off the appeal in accordance with law. This Court does not consider it proper to accede to the request to fix a time frame for disposal of the appeal by the Appellate Authority, as the same has already been provided under Rule 2, creating the Appellate Authority. The writ application stands disposed. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)