IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.188 of 2010 NAWIN KUMAR SINGH SON OF LATE JANAK NANDAN PRASAD SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SHEOTAR, P.S. ATARI, DISTRICT GAYA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THRU.CHIEF SECRETARY BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE , OLD SECRETARIATE, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. HOME COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HO ME (POLICE) BIHAR, PATNA. 4. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GAYA. 5. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GAYA. 6. SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, KHIZARSARAI (BATHANI) DISTRICT GAYA. 7. OFFICER-IN-CHARGE ATAR POLICE STATION, DISTRICT GAYA. ----------- 02. 03.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that in proceeding under Section 107 of the Indian Penal code petitioner was noticed to which he has already submitted his show cause reply, however, the matter is not still disposed of. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present application to ventilate his grievance before the respondent no. 6. In case, such petition is filed, the same may be considered in accordance with law. The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn 2 with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)