@ H§GH SOUR? QF CHHATTISGARH AT BELA5PUR SINGLE BENSH: HQN’BLE SHR! H.L. DATTU, C,J. Whit Petition No. 1996 of 2002 Petitioner Smt. Kamla Sinha, W/o EEsahu Ram Sinha, aged 4O years‘ Occupation - Sarpansh, Gram Panchayat Parsuli, Rio Village - Parsuli, Post Khudni, Police Station - Kanwar, Tahsil Gurur, Diatrict Durg (C,G.) Versus 1‘ State of Chhamagarh Wkggh- Raspondents V Secretary, Panchayét ! & Rurai Devebpment Department, D.K.$‘ Bhavam Raipur. Commissioner, Raipur Additional Collector, Durg. Sub Divisional Ofncer (Revenue)! Balod, District Durg. Tahsilclar, Gurur District Durg. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Gurur, District Duig. Lekhnath, S/o Aghari Ram Sahu, Up- Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Parsuli Rio Village - Parsuli, Tahsil Gurur, District Durg. (3)01 bwM I\ Present: Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, counsei for the petitioner $hri AS. Kachhawaha, Govt. Advocate for the Staie. GRAL ORDER (Paesed on 16i March, 20$?) After arguing the matter for quite some time, iearn‘ed couneei appearing for the petitioner would submit that the reii‘efhjei‘ought for in this writ petition would not euniive for considjqation of thfs Court. 2) Taking note of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructtious. However, iiberty ie reserved toethe‘wpetitioner to approach the appropriate authorities for redressal of} all other grievance§ if any. Ordered accordingly_e1ir Sd/— i Chief Justice t M) _ (