1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (227) No. {LL OF 2009. PETITIONERS : /‘1 . a? PEL. L4 M M 7’5 Laxman, Son of Bhagela, aged about 72 years, / 2. Ramanuj, Son of Dayal, aged about 6O years, 3. QMDayal, Son of Bhunaram, aged about 8O years, Harchand, Son of Late Amardas, aged about 63 years, ‘ 5. Jairam, Son of Ramdayal, aged about 58 years, ‘ Mulchand, Son of Laxrnan, aged about 48 years, Smt. Shyarn Bai, Wife of Nemdas, aged about 6O years, Smt. Chandrikabai, Wife of Mohit am, aged about 6O years, Smt. Chandrika Bai, Wife of Hemdar, aged about 50 years, Lalitabai, Wife of- Nan Thakur, aged about 56 years, Zhalobai, Wife of Dev Prasad, aged about 48 years, The above named petitioners number 5 and 10 are resident of Village — Bhaneshar Mission Post— Jairam Nagar, Tahsil Masturi, District — Bilaspur (C.G.) Petitioner number 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9 8L 11,are resident of Village and Post — Devgaon, Tahsil and Police Station Masturi, District Bilaspur, (C. G.) R VERSUS RESPONDENTS : / l) The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Government of Chhattisgarh Department of Geologf and Mining D K.S. Bhawan Raipur, (C.’G.)' 2) The Director, Department of Geolog/ Mining Sonakhan Telibandha, Raipur (C. G.) 3) The Collector (Mining) District Biiaspur'(c. G.) 4) N. B. Singh, aged about 34 years, S/o. late Shri Jodhan Singh, R/o. H—l /2O Narmada Nagar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22%- OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA iiGhg CGUR’! OF Cfr§§-iA?Ti$$ARE-i gm" B!LASPL§% W§W PETWEQN (22?) Nil 51’E (3F 29%3 ?&iiiionars Laxman & Oihers Versus Rewondenis The State of Chhatiésgarh & Crihers WRIT PETiTiGN UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CéNSTITUWON OF INDIA £38 : Han’bae Mr. $atish K. Agnma‘m, M ' awsgm :- Shri MD. Dhote; Advocate forthe petiiioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the Siate. G§EER {QwL} (Passed on 23rd day of October, 201 0} 1. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permissian of this Ceur‘i to withdraw this petiiion with iiberty to take recaurse to sieiutery appeiiate provisicn as provided under rhe provisions of Chhattisgarh Minor Minerai Ruies. 19%; Learned counsei appearing for oiher side has no objection. it is ordered, as prayed for. ixooordingiy; the writ peiiiion is dismissed as withdrawn; with the aims-skated iiberty. Sd/- Satish K.'Agnihotri r , Judge asnok' /