1 ao2-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 2 OF 2011 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2011 Vijay Purushottam Bodha .. Appellant V/s. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr. .. Respondents .... Mr. A. S. Rao i/b. Ms. Pratibha Borade for the appellant. Ms. K. K. Sorann for respondent-BMC. .... CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 15, 2011. P.C. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents states that the suit structure is in existence as of today. By the impugned order, ad-interim relief of temporary injunction has been refused. Perused the documents annexed to the plaint. The challenge in the suit is to the order of demolition under section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1988. Looking into the documents 2 ao2-11 produced by the appellant, the suit structure ought to have been protected till the disposal of the Notice of Motion. As the Notice of Motion is pending, it is not necessary to record detailed findings. 2. Appeal from Order is disposed of by passing following order : :: O R D E R :: i. Both the parties will maintain status-quo as of today in respect of the disputed structure till the disposal of the Notice of Motion. ii. Hearing of the Notice of Motion is expedited. iii. All contentions of the parties on merit are kept open. iv. Civil Application No.1 of 2011 does not survive and the same is also disposed of. JUDGE