RSA No.999 of 2000 (O & M) - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.999 of 2000(O & M) Date of Decision: 29.03.2011. Gurdev Singh Mistri ……Appellant Versus Shri Jainendra Gurukul Panchkula …...Respondent Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL. Present: Ms. Nidhi Garg, Advocate for Mr. S. S. Behl, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Vivek Suri, Advocate for respondent. L.N. MITTAL, J (ORAL) CM No.10294-C of 2010 and RSA No.999 of 2000 Suit filed by respondent-plaintiff for possession of the demised property by ejectment of defendant-appellant (tenant) therefrom has been decreed by both the Courts below. However, respondent has now moved CM No.10294-C of 2010 alleging that provisions of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 (in short, the Rent Act) have come into force in the Urban Estate of Panchkula where the suit property situated. It is alleged in the application that while deciding C.R. No.4571 of 2004 vide order RSA No.999 of 2000 (O & M) - 2 - dated 10.08.2009, it has been held by this Court that ejectment decrees passed by Civil Courts before coming into force of the Rent Act cannot be executed after the Rent Act has come into operation. Learned counsel for the applicant-respondent accordingly prays that the applicant-respondent/plaintiff may be allowed to withdraw the suit. In view of the aforesaid, CM No.10294-C of 2010 is allowed and suit filed by respondent-plaintiff is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, instant RSA No.999 of 2000 is allowed and judgments and decrees of the Courts below are set aside. (L. N. MITTAL) JUDGE 29.03.2011 A.kaundal