1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1345 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3865 OF 1993 Ratnakar Shankar Vaingaokar .. Applicant versus Shalini Anant Sawant & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.S.M.Kazi for the applicant. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 20th January 2010. P.C: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicant. In view of averments made in the application, a case for restoration of the writ petition is made out. 2. The order dated 11th October 2006 passed in the writ petition records that the respondents-landlords have already executed the decree and have taken possession. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant states that the said statement is incorrect. 3. Though a case is made out for restoration of writ petition, as far as restoration on interim relief is concerned, the applicant will have to file a separate application. 4. Civil Application is disposed of by passing the following order: 2 : O R D E R : (a) The writ petition is restored. Interim relief is not restored. (b) Liberty to file a separate application for interim relief. In the meanwhile, Registry will call for the report from the trial Court on the question as to whether decree for possession has been executed. (c) The writ petition shall be added to the final hearing board on 1st February 2010. (A.S.OKA,J)