-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M.No.M-14367 of 2009 Date of Decision: 9.7.2009 Vikram Singh @ Vicky ....Petitioner. Vs. State of Punjab ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present : Mr.Pardeep Rajput, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Ranbir Singh Rawat, AAG Punjab. * * * RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered vide FIR No.43 dated 14.3.2009 registered under Sections 364/148/149/120-B IPC at Police Station C-Division, District Amritsar. The petitioner has filed the present bail application in which the allegations against the petitioner are that he had abducted the son of the complainant. The petitioner had filed bail application No.142/2009 before Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar which was dismissed on 4.5.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that co-accused Raja has been granted bail by this Court in Criminal Misc.No.M-8965 of 2009 and that son of the complainant came back home next day safe and sound. It is submitted that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. As against this, learned counsel for the State submitted that role of the petitioner is categoric in the FIR as he was a party in abducting the son of the complainant. He further submits on instructions received from HC Jagir Singh that two other cases namely FIR No.166 dated 13.9.2007 -2- under Sections 332/353/186/148/149 IPC registered at Police Station C- Division, Distt.Amritsar and FIR No.2003 dated 11.11.2007 registered under Sections 467/382/342/149 IPC at Police Station C-Division, Distt. Amritsar are pending against the petitioner. Keeping in view the antecedents of the petitioner as well as seriousness of the offence, this Court is of the view that petitioner does not deserve the concession of extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail, therefore, the bail application is hereby dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 9.7.2009 JUDGE Meenu