INI TEE HIGE COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHEAT‘I‘IsGARH AT ExILASPUR W,P,NO..§”® OF 2001 WRIT PETITION. UMBER gRTICLE§ 22§ @212 QF THE CONSTITUTIW OF mm; wiiwol Bai PEEITIOHER Ev“. Battulal Dhohi ?v” aged about 19 years resident of Village—£dbhar Post Malkharauda, Tahsil &; Police Station Malkharauda Bistrict,JanJgir-Champa (C.G.) Verws BEsPONBmT§ : 1.‘“"€s*iié£e of: Chhattisgarn Acting, through—$‘ecretary Govt. of Chhattisgarh Raipur (C. GI. ). ' 2. Superintendent of Police «Eamigir-Champa Home Department District $aigir—Champa (C‘.G. ). 5. Sub Divisicmal Gfi‘icer (Police) Sakti, Bistrict Janjgir-Champa. 1+. Officer-Im-Charge Police Station-Malkharauda District.Jan$gir~Champa (C.G.2 ‘ WRIT PETITEON: UNDER ARTLEGLES 22 £2? OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDLA .' y WWWW w‘vwb‘luoz ’LaOA...’ WW 3 W 209 State by Shri Ranbir Heard. Learned counsel f0- petitioner Was sexually exf \ 'Ram Bareth, R/o Villageq Janjgir Chanpa on the aSE held in which said Set Ku with the petitioner and pro of the bov sent him to J _ known to the‘petitioner. A g is a letter to the Superim 16.8.2001 shows that thc station on 26.6.2001 and Divisional Officer (Police). Learned counsel for decision of this Court in ‘ Saluja 8r, another Vs. State decision of Apex Court repc Vsf‘fState of Punjab 'and otl to register case for no re: decision of the Apex Court is quoted below: t "\ \ Petitioner by Shri K.F,.Ansari, Advocate. Singh, Govt. Advocate. r the petitioner Submits that the )1oited by one Set §{umar S/o Thanda adbhar, Post— Malkharauda, District urance of marriage. A panchayat waS mar admitted having sexual relations mised to marry but thereafter parents ammu and his whereabouts are not emsal of document Annexure P/4 that .endent of Police, Janjgir Chanpa dt. t. matter was reported to the police thereafter on 30.6.2001 to the Sub the petitioner placed reliance on a N.P.No.' 158/2002 (Mahendra Kumar' ‘ )f Chhattisgarh 8r, others and also on a ‘ rted in AIR 2001 S.C. 21 13 (Mohindl‘o I Lers) and submits that failure of police isons whatsoever is not proper. The [tileW \ my wasmmntra mwawm summits 28‘62002 ‘ XI—H-22‘ C Wuma’wf‘grénfam mmmvfga r 2;. $WW The grievance of the appelant is that though she has ' approached the authan'ty for registeiing a case against the alleged accused persons but the police never registered a case and never put the law in motion, and therefore, having failed in an attempt in the High Court to get a case registered she hm; approached this Cour$rPursuant to the notice issued the respondents have entered appearance Though the learned counsel appearing for the State o unjab stated thof there had been an enquiry, we fail to undersiand as to how there can be an enquiry without registering a cr' nal case, On the facts alleged; it transpires that t eappellant approached the poiice for registering a eas and get the ailegation investigated into and yet for no r asons whatsoever the poiice failedito register the case. n the aforesaid premises; we allow this appeal and direct that a case be registered on the basis‘o the repor‘ to be lodged by the appellant at the Police Station within a week from today and thereafter the matter will be y investigated mto any appropriate ction be taken dingly; The appeal is dis osed of aceotdingly Having thus con meted the facts and Circumstances of the case in the opi'ni appropriate to issue a irectiom to the respondents to examine and register a case on the complaint made by the petitioner ‘ Within a wee from the ate of production of copy of this order, k ’ i investigate it and in C so any offence is made out then tile r i ‘ f P i i i : l a a r of this Court it would be just and ‘ g ‘ ' W§ZHV § W m 200‘ fmg m fé‘é mrm't 3% challan 6; in the compeen Court ofjurisdiction, which shl be dealt with in acordance With la. With the above cbservation this petition is dispose'a of finally. eied cy as'per rules. Crtfi op Fakhruddin Judg W Wm $Wm % tt al c w e