The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.28195 of 2011 Date: 18.10.2011 Between: Smt.K.Anitha Kumari ..... Petitioner AND 1.The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Municipal Administration, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad and another. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri T.Sreedhar Counsel for respondent No.1: GP for Municipal Administration Counsel for respondent No.2: Sri A.Radhakrishna Reddy, Standing Counsel for GHMC The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the acts and inaction of the respondents no relaxations or all road-widening consequential benefits extended to petitioner on par with others as the same were given to other house owners for their constructions from Lal Darwaza 'X' Road to Chatrinaka, Hyderabad as per G.O.MS.No. 423, M.A. dt. 30.7.1998 and G.O.MS.No. 483, M.A. dt. 24.7.1998 without recourse to the Law as arbitrary, illegal, ultra vires, void, unjust and unconstitutional.” At the hearing, Sri T.Sreedhar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, while stating that the material particulars relating to acquisition of the petitioner’s property and other relevant details have not been furnished in the affidavit, requested for permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to his client to file a fresh Writ Petition with proper pleadings. The request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is accepted and the Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.Nos.34805 and 34806 of 2011, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, are disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 18th October, 2011 LUR