CRM No. M 18650 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 18650 of 2010 Date of decision:14.12.2010 Gulshan Kumar ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Onkar Rai, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Vikas Malik, AAG, Haryana for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 400 dated 02.09.2009 under Section 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Sector 5, Panchkula, District Panchkula. It was contended that the present petitioner who is a private teacher was being involved on account of his photograph on the said form. It was further contended that the said photograph was misused by the said Raj Kumar and Aman Kumar in connivance with each other. In fact, it was CRM No. M 18650 of 2010 2 Aman Kumar who identified the said Raj Kumar. It was further contended that when the bail matter was being argued before the trial court, the public prosecutor duly produced the copies of account, opening forms and photographs showing the opening of an account by some Raj Kumar who was introduced by one Aman Kumar and Kartik Bhardwaj. Accordingly, vide order dated 09.07.2010, notice was issued to Advocate General, Haryana and the petitioner was granted interim bail. The said facts are not disputed. Today, learned State counsel, on instructions from SI-Surjit Singh, states that the petitioner has since joined the investigation. In view of the above, the order dated 09.07.2010 passed by this Court is made absolute. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 14.12.2010 mohan