IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10259 of 2011-F. Decided on: 2nd December, 2011. Vandana Sharma. … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & ors. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the Petitioner : Ms. Bhavana Dutta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “(i) That the respondents may very kindly be directed to count service on tenure basis rendered by petitioner till the issuance of regularization order i.e. from 4.12.1987 till 31.3.1994 for the purpose of annual increment and all consequential benefits be released in her favour. Respondents may be further directed to count the service on tenure basis for the purpose of pensionary benefits also.” 2. The petitioner claims the benefit of increments during the tenure period of service rendered by her and also count the said period for the purpose of pension. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in her favour by the judgments of this Court dated 16.12.2010 rendered in CWP No. 4550 of 2010 titled as Ravi Kumar vs. State of H.P. & others and in LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram vs. State. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. Therefore, the 2 writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgments referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copies of the judgments, referred to above. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 2nd December, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr/kck) Judge. 3