IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16291 of 2009 1. PYARI KUMARI @ PYARI DEVI 2. Deo Laxmi Devi Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 8.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners are the married sister and mother of the husband of the deceased apprehending arrest in a Police case under Section 304B/34 of the Penal Code. The defence on behalf of the petitioner no. 1 is that she was residing in her own matrimonial home separate from the matrimonial home of the deceased. In view of the nature of the allegations, this court is not persuaded that petitioner no. 2 is entitled to the privilege of anticipatory bail. The application is rejected with regard to her. Let the petitioner no. 1, namely, Pyari Kumari @ Pyari Devi surrenders in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 44/07, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)