1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6302 OF 2009 Urmila D/o Vasantrao Patil, R/o-Lohara, Tq-Lohara, Dist-Osmanabad. ...PETITIONER. VERSUS The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Department of Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.S.S. Jadhavar Advocate for Petitioner. Shri.V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Shri.V.D. Salunke Advocate for Resp. No.3. Shri.R.J. Nirmal Advocate for Resp. No.4. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.U. CHANDWAL, JJ. DATE : 10TH DECEMBER, 2009. PER COURT : 1. Shri Jadhavar, the learned counsel appearing 2 for the Petitioner has placed on record a communication made by Ramesh Shankarrao Patil, Secretary of Bhartiya Rashtriya Shikshan Sanstha, Lohara dated 9th December, 2009 along with the affidavit notarized at Osmanabad. By the said communication, it is informed to the Petitioner that her transfer order dated 28th August, 2009 is cancelled and the Petitioner is directed to resume charge as Head Mistress of Vasant Dada Patil High School, Lohara. The next document placed on record is communication made by the Petitioner addressed to the Secretary of Bhartiya Rashtriya Shikshan Sanstha, Lohara dated 9th December, 2009 wherein the Petitioner informed that she was taking charge accordingly. The documents are taken on record and marked as "X" collectively for identification. 2. Shri V.D. Salunke, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.3 disputes that Respondent No.3 had issued any such communication to the Petitioner regarding cancellation of her transfer order and the Respondent No.3 is willing to 3 contradict the documents placed on record by the Petitioner as they are produced before the Court for the first time. 3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of this Writ Petition in the light of the documents placed on record of this Court today. As the learned counsel for Petitioner seeks withdrawal of the Petition, we grant leave to withdraw the same. The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. We express no opinion on the dispute raised by the Respondent No.3. [K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] asb/DEC09/wp6302.09