1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. Writ Petition Nos. 5758/2006, 5761/2006 & 5763/2006 (Maa Sharda Mahila Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd. Akola Vs. M/s Shankarlal Satyanarayan & ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. R.L. Khapre, Adv. For the petitioner. Mr. S.N. Bhattad, Adv. For R- 3, 5 and 6. CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATE : 6 th October, 2008 Shri Bhattad, the learned counsel for the respondent no.3, states that the mortgaged properties which were attached and are subject matter of the present writ petitions, have been sold with the consent of the petitioner- Bank and the entire sale consideration has been deposited by the purchaser – M/s Buldana Cooperative Credit Society, Buldana, in the account of the respondents maintained by the petitioner. It is further submitted on behalf of the respondent no.3 that the petitioners have already adjusted the said amount towards their claim. A pursis dated 6/10/2008 stating the aforesaid fact is filed by the counsel for the 2 respondent no.3 in this Court today. Pursis is accepted on record and marked as Exh. “Z”. On hearing the learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and on perusing the pursis dated 6/10/2008, it appears that the prayers made in the writ petitions have been rendered infructuous. Writ petitions are, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE RMP