- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1890 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO.1824 OF 2004 ... M/s.Airpac Exports ...Plaintiff v/s. Rupesh Kumar Gautam & Ors. ...Defendants ... Mr.Snehal Shah i/b Dhru & Co. for the Plaintiff. Mr.A.M.Sarogi for the Defendant No.1. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 29TH APRIL,2005 - 2 - P.C.: This notice of motion is taken out by the Plaintiff. By order dated 20th July, 2004, ad-interim order has been passed in favour of the Plaintiff in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (b). 2. Defendants have been served. Reply has been filed by Defendant No.1. 3. Mr.Sarogi, learned Counsel appearing for the Defendant No.1 states that he has contacted the Defendant No.1 and the Defendant No.1 instructed him to state before the court that the matter has been settled between the parties and that the Defendant/company has been transferred to the Plaintiff. 4. Statement is accepted. 5. Though the statement is disputed by the Plaintiff, in my opinion, if the statement of the - 3 - Defendant is correct then confirmation of ad-interim order will not adversely affect the interest of the Defendants. Hence, ad-interim order is confirmed. Notice of Motion disposed of. ...