s^ k d \^ 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPURIC.G.) WRIT PETITION N0.4(84^ /2003 .^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1. 2. Ku. Nandita Choudhary, D/o. A.B. Choudhary, Aged 60 years, C/o. Jaideep Pandey, CH-204. Scheme No. 74, Vijay Nagar, Indore (M.P.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department ofHome (Police), Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Station House Officer, Police Station Farasgaon, District Bastar (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2260F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS. DIRECTION OR DIREetlONS, ORDEROR ORDERS : L^Q. XI-HC-2.2 ^T^T^r t^N^^ st^d^ i-ifei Y.-. 1!'1:; rii II i =T ^ ?:^';:%^^^ ^iirwi^ faCT^y^ .Aa^:.j^.^t$l<|^03 W-S^I:^?!N- •^ '200 Rl^^T <ai^?t? ^^ITW^s^ 11/05/2004: - Shri Ashish Shrivastevaleariied Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal| State/respondent. Heard both the counsel. This petition has been filei delay in disposai of the trial in Ku. Nandita Choudhary) pending i Class,Kondagaon. Learned counsel appearin| petitioner, a lady aged'about 60 punishable under Sections 409, 4^0 t^ie Court of Judicial Magistrate Fi| than ten years. Learned counsel protracting the case by not produ| contention copies of the order-sh^ along with the petition. <»ri<<fo<ftn(f^CT'Q'ffi^feit <I^-^K ^^riNp2r^jff counsel for the petitioner. learned Penal Lawyer for the |i by the petitioner against inordinate Crilninal Case No.100 of 1996 (State Vs. i|i the Court of Judicial Magistrate First for the petitioner submits that the years, is facing triai for the offences and 467 ofthe Indian Penal Code in st Class, Kondagaon for the last more Further submits that the prosecution is ;mg the witnesses. In support of this ?ets ofthe trial Court have been filed Having thus considered th^ facts and circumstances of the case ? and the material on record,with.oi|t expressing any opinion on the merits 1 - of the case, in the opinion of this (pourt ends of justice would be sen/ed if a direction is given to the trial Court for disposing of the aforesaid criminai case as eariy as poss$>le preferably within a period of six \^months from the date of productipn of the copy of this order. Ordered hft^^fe^ -r XI-HC-22 ^ ~^3f ^(Wtd^l, ^Til^Ko, faCT^y an^r XRf^ bO.^^0.^1^41^0-^ Nl^as 5b^i<^WWMm a*"*<'w<""' vppl 200 •^^r"' 37i^T^T / R<oh ^lt^ S»»Hicb<rlKa n^F W^[^<ITW^^ -^. accordingly. The parties and their <t»t<t{<!l<I11rl1RTR^Jf ^fe^ ^RgR ^ ^&i^ <HI$« counsel to co-operate with the trial Court. If required, the trial Court m|iy take coercive steps for production of the witnesses in accordance witlSi law. Copy of the judgment to be passed shall be sentto the Additjona| Registrar (Judicial) ofthis Court. With the above direction a<id observation, the petition stands disposed of. C.C. as per rules. Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice