KBP 8073-09.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8073 OF 2009 (Tukaram Vs. Mahadev) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s order Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr.Deokar i/b.Mr.R.S.Kate for petitioner. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 23 rd September, 2009 P.C. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Petitioners are the original plaintiffs. By the impugned order, an application for amendment of plaint made by the petitioner has been rejected. The application for amendment was made after the suit was closed for judgment. Considering the stage at which the application for amendment is made, no interference is called for at this stage. If the decree passed in the suit is adverse to the petitioner, the impugned order can always be challenged in an appeal preferred against the decree. 2] Keeping the rights of the petitioners open, the Writ Petition is not entertained and the same is rejected. [A.S.OKA, J.]