IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR^ WRIT PETITION N0, __J-^i /2003 PETmONER Cft : / Jeethanram, S/o Ram Kisun, aged 38 years, Occupation-Sarpanch ofGram Panchayat Mahabirgaiij District SargBJa, R/o Vill^ige Mahabirganj, Post Cheenya, Tahsil Pai, District Sarguja (C.G.) -VERSUS. RESPONDENTS /' / ^^- ^^ \y /' 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Prinoipal Secretary, Departmeist ofPanchayat & Rural Development, Mantrataya, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur. 2. Collector, Sarguja (C.G.) 3. Sub Divisiona! Officer (Reveoue), Ramamijganj, DistrictSarguja(C.G.). 4. BlockEducation Officsr, BIock Ramchandrapur, Post Ramanujganj, District Sarguja (C.G.) WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR IS8UANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT. ORDER8 OR DIRECTION. XI-HC-22 Sfl^T^T + -3^ ^I^M^, ^TflW14, fa<n^9?: ani^r 'qira? WH^IT^^t'^......^....4..^ 200-^ ({ci^<sr* 3in^T ^<w(W ch^td^ ^PTdf "^ 'fe^ <(^<^l< ^siptmsn^i 24-6-2003 Heard AAr. Rqjeev Shrivast^va, counsei for the petltjoncr and shri Scinjay X. AgrGwaI/Deputy Advocat4 Thls wrlt petition under A^ India has flled by thc petjtio| PanchayGt MohabirgGnj, Dis'| to him therein tl| by the @ram Panch^ds| &©c€mb€r 2002.,and on by.the Sub Dlvisiond Offic^ has' chalicnged be\ No.2 by filing.an wlth the ^tay appIicOTion. ha^ rejected vide fa^ hearing. By rejecting th ©eneralfor the Stcte / respondents. •ticie 226/227 of the Gonstitution of ner stating that he Q Sarpanch of |nct, Sarguja/. a cause notlce |at mld-day .med programnie not in the school between July 2002 |n of remova! of the petitioner r Ramanyjgary/ No.3 and the the Coltector Sarguja^.respondent p of the.Apped and Revislon..Ruies 1995 pAr. Shrivastava that the ^rder 9-6-2003 and the appeai is stay applicOTion the petitioner's has he is no|l gettlng justice, therefore, by this writ petition a reliaf has been sought t^iat the dated 9 June 2003 pQSsed by the Collcctor, Sarguja, In Panchay| the appllcation ^ Applicdtion (M.(W.)P. No. 1"63 st Apped No. A/89-64/2002-2003 by ejected, be set-aside. |3/2(X33} has been flled for stcying the operatlon of the 9S=6-20{33. Mr, Sanjay" K. Agrawd, Depupy Advocdte ©enerQlaccept notice for thc respondents and Informed the Court that the Qppea! i.tself hos XI-HC-22 STI^T^T f<riJ5b ^nt^r ^RWHf^T 6c ^ (^*y^^-j '3^ ^1^(^<4, ^Tll^^Ko, ?®l<y11<-t^< 3Tri[?r ^(^ *<l^<rl( ^^^....———.—..—••—..—^F^ 200 ^^T" ll^T ^W^T^CTW <-i(^<i ,—2-^— fixed for finai hearing on 30th Jun( order. After hearing the counsel clrcumstances of the cose, I am of| th© order, It wiil be the apped itself within a period Department to fl!Iaup the the before the fil!inl l.e. 30 or fijiing up.of the In of thls order, oppi No.5397/2003) stand disposed of. Jhc petitjon is disposec| are entltied for cerlji <;r»i<<i<n<ii^'wT^if ^ 'fetst <r3i^$i< ^^rf^n^Fn^T Jun^ 2003 which is clear from tha impu9ned for the parties and in the facts and |the opinlon that wlthout Interfering with Qppi^priate to dlrect the Coiiector to declde of 30 or in the Panchayat ^GCQncy of the Sarpanch in that to up of that vacGncy or before out of the ^acanc^ whichever is carller. ilcations {M.(W.)P. No. 1633/2003 <& 1A. disposec| of accordingiy. |fied copy of this order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge ^^^