IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.922 of 2011 Subhash Sah, son of Sri Munakka Sah, resident of Mahua, Trilok Chak Madhaul, P.S.-Mahua, District- Vaishali. ……………Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Pinki Devi, wife of Subhash Sah, D/o Sri Shambhu Sah, present resident of village-Nawa Nagar, Bidupur, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali. ….Opposite Parties. ----------- 4. 17.10.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. This revision application is directed against the order dated 31.01.2011 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali at Hajipur in Maintenance Case No.126/2009 by which the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.1000/-per month as interim maintenance to his wife, opposite party no.2. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is ready to lead conjugal life with his wife (opposite party no.2) and secondly he has no permanent income. It is admitted position that the petitioner is the husband of the opposite party no.2. The maintenance case is pending before the Principal Judge, Family Court, 2 Vaishali at Hajipur and only an interim order has been passed. I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. The petitioner is at liberty to raise his grievance before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali at Hajipur. I.A. No.1634/2011 also stands disposed of. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)