IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-17698 of 2009 (O/M). Date of Decision : July 07, 2009. Jawahar Lal. ...... Petitioner. Versus. Wazir Singh. ..... Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH. Present:- Mr. Jitendra Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL). Counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has nothing to do with the allegations, which have been made against the petitioner in the present complaint, which is under challenge before this Court, wherein quashing has been sought by the petitioner. He submits that he has not committed any fraud and not forged the documents of the vehicle, which is alleged by the complainant. He further submits that the forging of documents and the fraud, which has been committed was by three other persons, namely Rajbir, Vijay Pal and Rajinder against whom F.I.R. No. 172, dated 23.12.2002 stands registered under Section 420/467/467/471 I.P.C. at P.S. Loharu and the trial is on. He further submits that he has been un- necessarily roped in this by way of private complaint. I have heard counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the complaint as well as summoning order. Criminal Misc. No. M-17698 of 2009. The preliminary evidence, which has been led by the complainant before the Court is also clear and specific, where allegations have been made against him by the complainant and other witnesses, who have appeared before the court below and accordingly, order of summoning the accused has been passed, vide order dated 10.07.2008 (Annexure-P-1). The order passed by the trial court is fully justified. The allegations in the complaint also clearly spells out the offence, which is alleged to have been committed by the petitioner. Finding no merit in the present petition, the same stands dismissed. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) JUDGE July 07, 2009. sjks. -2-