IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25565 of 2011 1. Md. Niraj, son of Md. Mobhi 2. Md. Murad Ali, son of Md. Asar Ali. 3. md. Rahis @ Md. Rahim, Son of Murad Ali. 4. Md. Abadin 5. Md. Aslam 6. Md. Tasir 7. Md. Jasir @ Md. Kaila 8. Md. Nasrul 9. Md. Md. Najo, All (Accused/petitioner no. 4 to 9) sons of Md. Murad Ali. 10. Md. Ansar, son of Md. Mobhi. 11. Md. Mobhi, son of Md. Asar Ali 12. Md. Sattar, son of Md. Khursid. 13. Md. Sharif, son of Late Farzan. 14. Md. Sajjad, son of late Farzan All resident of village – bakhri bandh (Pawai), P.S. – Falka (Pothia), District – Katihar. ------------ Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar -----Opposite Party -------- 02. 25.08.2011 Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioners. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. All the fourteen petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Falka (Pothia) P.S. Case No. 75/2011, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, are named accused in this case with omnibus allegation of entering into the house of the informant and causing nuisance and assault. Submission is that there is counter version 2 also by way of complaint case which was lodged earlier in free fight relating to she-got grazing of Suryamukhi crops. There is nothing specific against either of the petitioner and injury inflicted to the prosecution side is simple in nature. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in connection with Falka (Pothia) P.S. Case No. 75/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for three years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)