IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 4896 of 2010 Date of Decision: 30.09.2010 Bhajan Singh and others .... Petitioners Versus Onkar Singh and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Sanjiv Pandit, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Rupinder Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Sunil Agnohotri, Advocate for the respondents ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition is filed challenging order dated 8.5.2008 passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Dasuya and order dated 4.6.2010 passed by Appellate Court/Addl. District Judge, Hoshiarpur whereby application moved by the petitioners-plaintiffs under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 seeking ad interim injunction restraining the defendants not to alienate the property during the pendency of the suit was dismissed. Both the learned counsel appearing before me fairly stated that any alienation made during the pendency of the suit shall be hit by principle of lis pendence irrespective of the fact injunction was refused or granted. Learned counsel for the respondents undertakes that plaintiffs-petitioners shall not be dispossessed from the house in which plaintiffs are residing during the pendency of the suit. In view of this, present petition stands disposed of with C.R. No. 4896 of 2010 2 the observation, any alienation made during the pendency of the suit shall be hit by principle of lis pendence. Trial Court is directed to decide the suit itself preferably within a year from today. (ALOK SINGH) 30.09.2010 JUDGE reena