c-f- ./po ^ THE HONOURABLE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WR.IT PETITION Nt^ C3-o->_/ 2001 . PETITIONER: Versus Fanjay Kumar Devangan S/o Late G. L. Devangan, aged about31 years, R/o Shantinagar, Sakari, P.0. Sakari, Tahsil & District: Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENT^ 01-6tate of Chhattisgarh, Through: ifs Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, State Secretariat, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ,.<02. Engineer in Chief, Water Resources Department, '->•'»8w. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. y-'^'y C/03-. Chief Engineer, Wlinimata Bango Project, Bilaspur, ^\f i •* l-*<^'' >'•<.* ^>0' ^^'^ ^ •^lS^ ;^^^ ^ ' Chhattisgarh. 04. District Collector, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. .K^ WRIT PETITION U/A 2?6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. A> XI-HG—78 '3^ ?<ffzTRT?T, 8>ti1u'IS, fii<'ll'yy,< i^O.p.f^S, "2-<rD3y'2-«T)l *KN?irgpn^f> sn^r TRRT (1pf3^i) 311^1 W W+ 'cT^TT 3TI^?T a»*ti^> ;;iraiwataaii? 18.6.2008 Eetatidaer By Shri M.K.Be^, Advoeate. State^wfShri Ranbtr Sing|hi, Govt. Advocate. ^HeaW:1";'':-'?.'' ^l'effiteiiier^iKiafher who SupeEiniileEHljeat: ^SIandal Adhilc EngiDJee@?;WatErj:Resources Di l8til ftMiiveiaafcerg 1999. TI was serving as Divisional ^hak) in the office of the Chief ipartment, BUaspur; died on \e petitioner applied for c6mpassioQsit&a|)pointment, tl^at application is stUl pending. IIT jsupipQrt^of his contei) gGtitioiieT^^'place^ reUanGe or[ Kipprted iri](2(3G(^ 6 S.C.C. 49^ Ition leamed counsel for the Steel Ai.rthcinfy o|India Ltd. & denlal of GOiiBugasslonate apptrintmeirt in deserving cases laerceived as^^d^ and economk: justk-e as enshrined in^ the sociallstic pattem of society as enxisaged in fhe Co 'fiwly^h •wiBi<! fe%> tF^^it ^i'arRraai^l a decision of Apex Court (Balbir Kaur and another Vs. pthers, wherein it is held that tistitution has to be attributed its full meaniag.^l.aw courts ca^inot be mute spectators where reltefls a:eniedto the horrejndoUs suflferings ofa famity, wtuch 'has lost Its brea.dwmrier. Learrjed counsel also placed reliance on a decision 6f this Court ret>orted in 2002(1) G.G.L.J. 257 (Smt. BImnbai Sahu Vs. State] r XI-HG—78 "3^':'lTqT?ra, »nl<rf'is, f««'tl'y>l,<. NI+Kfll^'ffIcR sn^r IISRT cpf^q^q) 3n^wft-ti<* TOI ar^twnw •SBHWifeisn^i 'Z-- T'^U^- Having considered the f^cts and circumstance of the case atid ia m.ew of the afores ;counset fiM"€lae petitfoner it i ^id decisions cited by leamed ^ directed that fhe competent as pQssibtg-ipreferably withln ttieii a rgasMied order wUl petltioner.^Ineaseany ajdvers^ shaLlbeajtiffber-t^ to approach] ^iNwftT'WRtl'4 fe'zt ^fWgTC ^'•sfim'an^r authprity sBalI consider and t4ke deciskin on the appUcatkin ofthe^pGtiiQoEieTseeking comp4ssk)nate appointment as eariy period of one month from the .(late.oEproigacticgi bf copy of ftjis order. If the claiin is refused |be passed after hearing the order is passed the petitioner this Court afresh. Wittit'tee above obserratijans this petttion is disposed of :,a.t^'El:tis,sta^.:':..3;' !: ^Partiss aTeentitled fbr c^rtified copy. Copy offhis order fae supplied.to tHeState coun^ :1. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^'&