1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. FIRST APPEAL NO.348 OF 1990. FIRST APPEAL NO.348 OF 1990. FIRST APPEAL NO.348 OF 1990. The State of Maharashtra : Appellant. versus Shaikh Abdulla Hussain : Respondent. Mrs.G.P.Mulekar, AGP, for the appellant. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. DATED : 28th June 2005. DATED : 28th June 2005. DATED : 28th June 2005. ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER 1. Counsel for the appellant has tendered a letter written by Mr.S.M.Kazi, the advocate for the respondent, to the effect that his client/respondent has handed over the possession of the premises to the Requisition Officer and, therefore, the appeal has become infructuous. The letter is taken on record and marked "X" for 2 2 2 identification. The learned AGP makes similar statement on the basis of instructions. In view of this, the appeal becomes infructuous and it is dismissed. No order as to costs. [D.G.DESHPANDE] 28/06/2005 JUDGE.