IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. ORDER 22.5.2009. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4698/2009 Jagdish Chand Shrangi & Anr. Vs. Bal Mukund Shrangi & Ors. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Shri S.C. Gupta, for the petitioners. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The respondent has taken a preliminary objection that the writ petition has been filed against the order by which the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC has been dismissed. He submits that the petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy by way of filing of revision petition under Section 115 CPC as the order if passed in favour of the petitioner would have ultimately resulted in the dismissal of the proceedings itself. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an alternative remedy is no bar for filing the writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner then submitted that the writ petition may now be treated as a revision petition under Section 115 CPC in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4698/2009 Jagdish Chand Shrangi & Anr. Vs. Bal Mukund Shrangi & Ors . I am of the view that the petitioner has remedy to withdraw this writ petition which is at the very initial stage and file a revision petition. The judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court was not one where the case was at the very thresh-hold as in the present case. The Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the documents to the petitioner after retaining the photo stat copy of the same on record. The petitioner would be entitled to claim condonation of delay in accordance with law. Subject to the above, this writ petition is disposed of. (DALIP SINGH),J. Ramchandrkhatri,PS