IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 4TH JULY 2008 / 13TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 9060 of 2006(C) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SUNIL KUMAR, S/O.VASU, AGED 39, KOLATH HOUSE, KUNDUARA ROAD, CHEMPUKAVU, THRISSUR-680 020. BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE PRESIDENT, THRISSUR DISTRICT PANCHAYAT, THRISSUR. 2. THE STANDING COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICE, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT HOSPITAL, THRISSUR-1. BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN - R1, ADV. SMT.P.A.ANITHA - R1. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.9060/2006-C: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE DISABILITY CERTIFICATE ISSUED FROM MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, THRISSUR. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION CENTRE FOR HANDICAPPED DTD. 27/10/1986. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE TELECOM DISTRICT ENGINEER, THRISSUR DTD. 24/02/1987 TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE LAST AGREEMENT EXECUTED ON 07/10/2003. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 26/12/1998 OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF MEDICAL COLLEGE TO THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, PWD BUILDINGS, THRISSUR. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 31/12/2005 ISSUED BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF MEDICAL COLLEGE TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DTD. 03/01/2006. EXT.P.8: COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 24/01/2000 ISSUED BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION CENTRE FOR HANDICAPPED, TRIVANDRUM. EXT.P.9: COPY OF THE QUOTATION NOTICE DTD. 15/03/2006 PUBLISHED BY THE R.3. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBIT: EXT.R1.A: COPY OF THE PLAINT. O.S. 334/06 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, THRISSUR DTD. 28/01/06. //TRUE COPY// prv. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.9060 of 2006 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 4th July, 2008. J U D G M E N T In the matter of conduct of a telephone booth, in case the petitioner has still any grievance left, he may approach the first respondent, since the petitioner has already executed an agreement. The writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH, J ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.9060 of 2006 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 4th July, 2008.