HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ** HYDERABAD MAIN CASE: A.S.No. 698 of 2005 PROCEEDING SHEET o. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 19.08.2011 BCK, J AS.M.P.No. 2225 of 2009 Heard both sides. For the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petition is ordered. _____________ 19—08—2011 A.S.M.P.No. 1804 of 2011 The petitioner herein is the appellant. She filed the suit for partition of the suit schedule property. The said suit was dismissed holding that the husband of the first defendant—gifted the suit schedule property in favour of the first defendant, who accepted the same and that the plaintiff is not entitled to partition of the suit schedule property. Challenging the same, the plaintiff filed this appeal. The other defendants have not filed any appeal. During the pendency of the appeal, the first respondent herein, who is the first defendant in the original suit died. Now the fourth respondent herein is brought on record as legatee of the first respondent. Now the petitioner/appellant and the fourth respondent have filed this application to record compromise along with a Memorandum of Compromise. The petitioner/appellant is present in the court and she admitted that she has received a cheque for a sum of Rs.8.00 Lakhs through two cheques bearing No.172484 and 172485 dated:18.8.2011 drawn on Indian Overseas Bank in full and final settlement of her claim. It is also mentioned that the appeal is not pressed against respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein. Thus, in view of the terms and conditions of the compromise, the appeal stands dismissed as against Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 and is allowed as far the respondent No. 4 is concerned in terms of the Memo of compromise. _____________ 19—08—2011 *BVS AS.No. 698 of 2005 The appeal suit is disposed of. Vide separate order. (BO) BVS. o. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE