IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPU3{$% CHHATTISGARH Writ Petition (Si No. [Our of 2008 / z /V\;€M Smt. Santoshi, W/o Sahib Ram, PETITIONER ... ...... Jé};&.@Wih aged about 23 yeaxs, R/o/Village "e Durgapali, Gram Panchayat Godhiyari, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (CG). / Versus / < \ V 5y$v RESPONDENTS : L State of Chhattisgarh, Through the .\ 61/ Secretary Department of Woman 9? g2 guiliig?’ textiglye?’ $1: x\ CaQ" (Chhattisgarh). / 2. Director (Panchayat), Chhattisgarh 6L“ Raipur (CG). 3. Collector, Raigarh (CG). (L, /. 4. Additional Collector, Raigarh (CG). PL, 5. ’Chief Executive Officer, Janpad )Dw/ Panchayat, Sarangarh, District Raigarh (CG). Project Officer, Integrated Child {Li- Developme‘nt Project, Sarangarh, District Raigarh (CG). Smt. Satyabama, W/o Gopal Yadav, R/o . village Village Durgapali, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (CG). WMW’W @Jw %/’/3ao/‘08 22‘; W ”all“ WXW‘9 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE(§;6>OF TIIIE arONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITMHRITS, DIRECTIONS ETC., IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI AND OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OF LIKEr NATURE . / v /@/ HIGH CO§RT OF CHH&TTE§$ *4? AT EELAS?U§ Singie 3emch z HamEie 3W. 3mh‘cg ?ri€*inker‘ Eiwakar Wri? Pam‘an is) No. 198 a? 29335 ?ETETEGNE§ Smir. Sameshi Varsas RES’PONDENTS 5mm a? {Chmffkgar’n & afhers. Shri B.D. Guru, caunsei far fhg sawionar. Shri M5? 55mg§1i P i. Tar Th2 Smm/restmndaiaw k3 1 1‘0 4 1&6. Shri Akhiiegh Kumar,'caunsa’ far rasgzmden? NJ, 5, Shr'i Qaghvendm Wadhan. muma? fer ’r'essmmiiem N3, ? WRET 9ETE?EG?\§ UN§£§€ ARTEILE 3.2%}??? f}? E4? $GN3?ITUTI£EN $3: INEEA Q R D E 52 {271i$9261£33 Chai!enge in irhe presam“ wri? gairi?§an Es w +ha ardar‘ da‘i‘ed 12.12209? {énnexure P-E} sassaé by raspamien‘? Na Direcfo'r' (Panchaya‘r), ‘Sfrafe (3‘? Chha??isgcwh czawzg 7*?12 appecd of rgsysandenf N0. E’ agcémsf ha cance‘im‘ian ef $12? appoinfmem at“ We gas? af y‘msqgmwaiii wcrker. 2. Brdzf fams :af é‘ha case are fi’icfr an 26,102‘36é me respanden’r Na 7. Smi Smycbmmc was appcimed a5 Aanganwadi wwka? fm" vilwgz f , Takwii Samaigarh, .D§s‘rrict Rnigw‘h by respmc‘ian? No; {'3 §3rcjecf Officer, Eafegmfed Chid Bavawmgq? ?;"aggci‘ Sarangarh. Her ‘ appoinfmem‘ wrss camgééed an 32,236? by griwviaf; Officer affar recawmg cermén mmpiaén‘irg. This awe? dafarj 3.2.2007 was assailed by rewmdem Na ? befggae ’rhe‘ Direcmr {Panchaya?) Em; way a? agpeaé whisk ms beam aEiawed Vida impugned ordar‘ dawé 23132153137. In W5 mgamwhiig, as Th2 agpeiwmenf Q‘f ‘E’he wespwdaz‘? Nc' E" was mnceiied on € }h J' I & )” 23 I m . 3.2.2001 ma §efi?icner was apggaimgd as Aangwwadi Werkar in her placg Vida Cyrder dwgd 136290? (Annexure {3—5:}. Againsf ‘rhe‘ appoimman‘r 9f Jr'ha pg'?§?ien:er separafe appeai was fiieci by respandem‘ N0; ? m 2G.8,ZO§? befara A§difiom§ Ceiiecfcr‘ vide. Amexurg PJ im.ieaaéng fha gsefifrianer as (me a3? fhe respmdams. E1“ has been mfgrmad h}; “he pam‘iw &$f0ra ‘Jfhis Cwr? z‘i’zgf Tha s'giaf awga! wag: remdergd infruc‘ruaus. 4. The mam wizmme a? Em pgfié‘mnar is frhm‘ in apgea! before ‘rh'e Dirafrer {?é3mhay&f}, respendsznf Na. 7 has deiibem‘i'aiy m? émpkcgded “v? pefrifmngr‘ a3_parfry ‘fhough necessary parw md ‘fha mdz‘r impugnaé has been obmined bahmd her back: 5, Caunsgi fgr ma. amem 3gb..fs 159m? fha crdar imwgned has been mssgg“ 2* 12.i2.2GQ? whgr‘egs ma peTi‘fiangr was appgimeé m E5§EO€€ and kmw§mg fhis fu§§y wel}, fhe re$§wdgw .NG. .7 had fiigd m awed befcrg ‘rhg Addi‘?§0nal Caikg'mr‘ bu? 3W3 fat? was supprassad befom The Directm" (Pamiqaya’r) En The pandiag appaa! and, fhera‘fora, fhg order impugned deserves ’m be set aside as m cppcWuniTy hag been given 1'0 The petitioner. 6. Ccunsel far raspanden? Neq ?' admi’rs that petéTEaner’ was no? imp£ggded as a party befwe fhe Direismr {?gLnchayaT). He héwevgr submi‘rs Thai anrpoén?mem‘ 0f tha Betifirmer' r’ mai‘z ‘ was ‘cancgHeg‘ 9n 5,1.2Q08 (Amngxgr’e, Q—3} and fha said cancaia’mm arder has n0? been assaiégd by fhe pg'ti‘ricnar‘ bgfgre any fgrum. 7. Ccunsei far mg 5mm submits “mg? fhis pefificm mm he ' disposed 0f affgr (washing The impggned order dafad ‘ 12:12.20G? and direc?ing fhg par?§&s Tm‘iig appmpriam‘appeai ' .z /@3 for irheir rasgecfive rights befm‘e. fhe Commissiongr, gimspur‘ and fhe Commissiaher may ba direcfed T9 ‘adjudkme fha ma‘r’rer affer‘ giving dug oppcrtumz‘ias 'to ah fhe par’ries. 8. I havg heard caumszi far fhe partHes. 9. I? §$ no? disputed by Tha pam‘ies 4mg? whiig passing The impugned crdar dafgd lZiZiGQZ The peTii’iQner has m? been heard as she was no? impieaded as‘a par?y. It ig aisg apparent? fhaf Order dm‘ed 51.2008 which has bgen passed on We, basig m‘ arder dm‘ed 12.12.2007 has aiso m)? bean a53ai§ed by frha phm‘ie‘s before any forum. ’ 10. ‘Considering a}! These aspec’rs 9f The case, in particuiar fhe fac? that? ’rhe paw‘i‘ricner has n91 been gévzn any appiarmnéfy bgfore passing ihg impiJgried arcigr, mg ardar daizd 12.12.2007 (Amexure P-l) be $3? aside. As agreed by ail The pariies, They are given. iiber'Ty Te appmach The Commissiener wiThin cne monTh “from The de‘ie m‘ receipT cf capy 0f Thie order and. in The even‘iuaiiTy sf Tiiing any appeai/aigpeais by The parTies, The same shaii be decided in eccardance wiTh iaw afTer giving fuii opparTuniTy Te The parties. Tiii The maTer is decided by The Commissiomer, inTerim order daTed 5.2.2008 paesed by This ceuri‘ wauid remain in operaTien and Tine peTiTioner would conT nue To perfgrm her duTies as Aaganwacii wanker in The viiiege Durgapaii,‘ Tahsii‘ Sarangarn, ibisTrieT Raigarn. i Sdl- *g‘i V i i i r_#_ irr e 11. WriT peTiTion is accar'ciingiy dispased o x W . \v-w i t Pritinker Diwakeri ’ Judge g .