IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 12630 of 2010 Date of decision: 03.05.2010 Reena ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Kamaljeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Manish Bansal, Advocate for respondent No. 3 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. At this stage, Mr. Manish Bansal, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 3. He states that the matter has been compromised and respondent No. 3, who is present in Court, undertakes not to harass the petitioner. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for respondent No. 3, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 03.05.2010 mohan