IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.166 of 2009 SATYENDRA SINGH ..PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SUNITA DEVI ..OPPOSITE PARTIES For the petitioner : Mr.Rakesh Kumar Tiwary For the State : Mr. S.Ehteshamuddin,APP ----------- 02. 17.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 19.12.2008, passed in S.Tr.No.425 of 2008 by learned F.T.C. 4th, Siwan, whereby his application filed under section 227 of the Cr.P.C. has been considered and rejected. While assailing the order, it is contended that the petitioner had lodged an FIR with regard to murder/killing of the husband of the second informant of this case. It is contended that several months thereafter a fresh FIR was got instituted on the basis of the statement of the widow of the deceased. I have perused the order impugned. Learned trial court has minutely perused the materials on record and has come to the conclusion that there is/are sufficient materials on record to proceed with the case by framing charge under appropriate section(s) s of the Penal Code. Considering the scope of the jurisdiction and the reasonings assigned in the order impugned, this Court is not inclined to interfere therewith. The application is accordingly 2 dismissed. Needless to observe that petitioner shall be at liberty to agitate/raise all the issues during the relevant stage of the proceeding. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )