HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 2253 of 2007 Jawahar Lal Gupta, Son of Badri Prasad Gupta, aged about 64 years Retired Vaccinator, Resident of Village Davna, Tahsil Post Patarapali, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (CG). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The Director, Health Services, Raipur (CG). 3. The Chief Medical and Health Officer, Ambikpur, District Surguja (CG). 4. The Block Medical Officer, Community Health Centre, Ramanujnagar, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja(CG). 5. Accountant General of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present : Shri Ashok Kumar Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Alok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate for the respondents No. 1 &4/State. Shri Ajay Baraik, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri S.K. Beriwal, Standing counsel for Union oflndia. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 7th dayofMay, 1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 2. This petition pertains to payment of retiral benefits. 3. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of the retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Govemment, pursuant to the order dated s^ 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Govemment and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105/2008 (State of Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31 of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected matters, as submitted by the leamed counsel appearing for the parties. 4. This petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concemed, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concemed may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner, be completed within a period of four months from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. 5. The petitioner shall supply one extracopy ofthepetitionto the counsel for the State as well as to the counsel for Union of India for transferring the same to the committee. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur