IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 2196 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 30.03.2011 Smt. Santosh ....Petitioner Vs. Smt. Raj Rani @ Babli and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL ****** Present:- Mr. Sunil Chadha, Advocate, for the petitioner. A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) This petition assails the order dated 11.11.2010 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Patiala, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the succession petition, was dismissed. The petitioner, while filing the petition, was to fill the proforma as mentioned in the Indian Succession Act. But, there is no such column requiring the petitioner to furnish date of marriage. The petitioner was to prove her right by proving her marriage with deceased Som Nath by leading evidence. No such amendment, as sought by the petitioner, is essential. Disposed of accordingly. (A.N.JINDAL) 30th of March, 2011 JUDGE ajp