IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID FRIDAY, THE 5TH DECEMBER 2008 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 CRP.No. 361 of 2005() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 09/08/2004 IN EA 40/03 IN EP 1/02 IN OS.55/2000 of SUB COURT, TIRUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): 1ST RESPONDENT ----------------------------------- THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, TIRUR BRANCH, TIRUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI SRI.R.SHYAM KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS AND RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 -------------------------------------------------- 1. P.KUNJIMOIDEEN @ KUNJIN KUTTY, 49 YEARS, S/O.UNNEEN HAJI, PARAPPARA HOUSE, OMACHAPUZHA AMSOM, PERINCHERI DESOM, P.O.OMACHAPUZHA, TIRUR TALUK. 2. T.E.KADIYAMMA KUTYY, 47 YEARS, W/O.KUNJUMOIDEEN @ KUNJIN KUTTY, PARAPPARA HOUSE, OMACHAPUZHA AMSOM, PERINCHERI DESOM, P.O.OMACHAPUZHA, TIRUR TALUK. 3. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, TIRUR TALUK, TIRUR. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR(REP. BY KERALA STATE), MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN FOR R1 & R2 SRI.K.N.SASEENDRAN FOR R1 & R2 GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R.3,4 SRI.K.S.RAJESH FOR R1 & 2 THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ----------------------------------------- C.R.P.No. 361 of 2005 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of October , 2008 ORDER On 25.7.2008 this Court directed the Bank to consider whether the matter can be closed after realising the balance amount due under the One Time Settlement Scheme. It is submitted by the counsel for the Bank that pursuant to the said order, the 1st respondent has approached the Bank and filed a representation. As desired by this Court the Bank authorities took a favourable stand and decided to confer the benefits under the O.T.S. Scheme to the respondents. The Bank authorities agreed to settle the matter and receive the amount in accordance with the O.T.S. Scheme. It is also submitted by the Bank authorities that though a representation was submitted pursuant to the detailed order by this Court as mentioned above, the 1st respondent has not paid the balance amount due as per the O.T.S scheme. When the matter is taken up today, neither the party respondents nor their counsel are present. However, in view of the offer made by the Bank I further grant a months time from today to make the payment. Post on 5.12.2008. (HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE) es. HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. --------------------------- C.R.P No. 361 of 2005 ---------------------------- JUDGMENT 31st October, 2008