1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.1918 of 2010 (Arun Narayanrao Barde v. Sau. Vimal Keshavrao Bairan and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri M.P. Khajanchi, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri Ramesh Darda, Advocate for R- 1, 2A, 2B, 2C, 3 and 4. Coram : R.M. Borde, J. Dated : 30 th July, 2010 The learned counsel appearing for the respondents/original decree-holders makes a statement that in execution of the decree passed in Special Civil Suit No.127 of 1989 (Execution Petition No.18 of 2004), a sale-deed is got executed through the Court on 3-4-1988. So far as the possession of the superstructure is concerned, the same is received by the decree-holders in execution of a decree passed in Special Civil Suit No.203 of 1998, which was presented against one Vinod Gaikwad, who was stated to be possessed of the superstructure. The application was presented by the decree-holders for securing execution of the decree and the decree-holders are stated to have received the possession of the suit property on 23-11-2005. In this view of the matter, the learned counsel for the petitioner/judgment-debtor, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings permissible in accordance with law. Leave granted. 2 The petition is rejected as withdrawn. Judge. pdl.