'3s5Sf ^|^|<<t<4, g'Tfltl'ls, Rloil^f<. \' Nl*<<?11 *t1|ab' :.C.:..<'.;....2.%..<?.. WI. 200S an^r TR^ (ijqf^^tr) SII^I.qilKi-fi'b TWI 3(RW **< ?^IRR ^lf?3 3^T <<)^Id<il-1 ^l^dT if fS^V ^^,i\ ^aTfiPTSlI^T M/s Gaiiesh Shankar Pande;>', IDaharanishala Bazar, Gorakhpur- [273001 (U.P.) Through it's Power of lAttornev Holder-Shri- Ram Awatar [Agrawal, Aged about 53 years, R/'o Link poad, Bilaspur-495001 (Chhattisgarh) M/s Rani Awatar Agrawal, Pon-er bl' Aftornev Holder-Shri Ram Awai.ar [A.grawal, S/o Satya Pal Agra.wal, Aged ^.bout 53 years, R/o. Link Road, |Bilaspur-495001 (Chhattisgarh) 'JBRSUS The Chairman Cum managing Director, South Ea Coalfield Limited, Seepat Road, PO: SECL, BiIaspur(C.G.j The General Manager (Civil) South Eastern Coalfield Limited, Seepat Road, PO: SECL, Bilaspur (C.G.) Present; Mr. Anand K. Tiwari, coun] Dr. N.K,Shukla, Sr. Advoc^ resoondents. sel for the applicant. .te with Mr. Dilip Dubey, counsel for the .2007 T'he app]ieants have pre :n~ecl tilis application. under Section 11 (6) ofttie Arbitration aud ,.Ct->nciiiation Act, 1996 (for brevin' 'the Act of 1996) for appoiiTticiSiW' bf SQle'arbitrator with flie avermpat GRPRJ— FS/246—2/2007— 50,UOO. :<v XI-BC—78 3:eer ^ll^l^, (S'dl'y'iiic, Ri^i'Hy \^' .<rn.:..c7'...$..;......2:.3...'?. SW^V 'VSSK (!j«if-l««ff) an^t^i R-iWi ?PH 3Ii^?T ^TRi^ TOiiwofer sn^i ^r-ll[^l-aATf T(TO^f '^^f^si' <^lt^R i? srRpT 3ii^r ioveialier Itl fh4ir that the applicsuits and ti] agreeiu.ent dated 9'41 N< strengtlienuig & black tQppi] The work order was issued] conipletion of the work was 2 and itwas to expire on 2.8.2| agreem.ent, fb.e applicaats a]j Sub-contractor and gave respoudents and obtaitied 9.6.2000. The work was c<] ackaowledged by dociiirLent certiiicate of Annexure A/S^ However, there was iaorcliaat< on tiie part of respondents ai revised estiuiate, the appU^ ca11ing upon the respondents 15 days, vide Aiiiiexure A/9. parties regardiag iiaposition ete. aad fmally the applic; (Aunexiire A/ 13) raised their fijie non-applicaiits entered into an. 1998 for the work of widenmg, of BUaspur Seepat-Baloda Road. on 3.8.1998 aiid time aUowed for ft inouths commenciag from. 2.8.1998 pOO. After entei-uig iato the contract |ipoiated Ram Awatar Agrawal as its tmtunation to this efiect to the i4ir approvalvide Aanexure A/6 dated ^inpleted 011 31.12.2001 aad it was ()f Annexure A/7 aiid accordin.gly, a was issued by the respondents. delay in prepai-ation of the fiiial biU ajp.d because of delay ia preparatioa of seived notice dated 1.4,2003 to aiTaiige for fuial payment wifhia There was a dispute bebveen the pf penalty, claiiiis towai-ds escalation aAts v-ide ttieii- letter dated 6.4.2005 ailii ppU^aB.ts as The above claim. was fclaim. amouiitiag to Rs. 255 lacs. not replied by fh.e respondents. Thereafter, flie luatter was IjaJsen up before the Chairiaaii-cuiu- Maaagiug Director for releas^ of due paynient i.e. Rs.255 lacs or else a request for appoint^ient of sole arbitrator as per the -^- XI-HC—78 ^esf ri|i<)id<), ^T)1y'i(S, Ri<?ii+iy ^....<rCT..-.<:..:..c,;.....2r.'a..'?.. aii^r •WK cySy^ss) 3)1^1 Vf R-ti'h '^SH3TR?T^RT^ ?ww?fean^i 3 ^f^t^'i^'T Tnl^ff ^f^l^sl' <f^r^f'<: ^T3iRPT3i!^r provisions of Civil Engiaecr| receipt of fhis letter, to adjud] dated 10.5.2005 ofAiinexure rfiig Mauual, witliiii 30 days of the tcate the niatter was inade, vide letter |A/14. It is stated by the app] the Civil Eiigiueeriiig Man] provisions ia the Civil Eng^ Clause 14 of tlie Civfl Enj; clause, which reads as underj }icants that ta case of any aiubiguity, bal shaU be refen-ed to emd the ^i|aeerm.g Maaual shatl prevaU upon. .ilieenng Maaual contaiiis arbitration 14.2Fxcept vjhere o\ contract all questions of the specification, c!es| hereiii before menfton ivorkniaiiship or mate'i'\ any other question, whatsoever in any ifaij contract, design draidj iiisir'uctioi'ts, ordei's or\ concenzing the works execute the saine cominenceinent/ the coinpletion o'r io, onfailure qfsefttemj and on recjuest of the fhejiwse provided for in ihe ci^id dispuies relatiiig fo ineajiing gns, draiuings and instructioiw ^d and. as to the quality of fai's used on the work or as to ;?cn'?ri, righl, inatier or thing ansrng out of or relaiing fo the jings, specification, esftmafes, i.hese conditioiis or othei'wise OT the execuiion or failure h pf^gr abandojiment em^nf whetfzer ansi'ng during cjgress of the work or after ilie thereof shall be referred of disputes by the coinpany dpntractor as per clause 14.1 of XI-8C—78 3^cf riii<< !<?i<<, tS.T)1^'ie, (Si<»>id^< ..•?2?..-..<"...'...C^.....'2T.?...'?. 311^1 ^T R-fi'b | ^n 3TT^?T fl-»Hi=n ^TOR'H^T •311^1 4 'hiqtt-l'fll ^IFRTf tf.'fe^ At^K '^i'srfiw aii^r ihe contra.cl, ihe sol^ appointed by the Ozair^nan the company or any oih^ appoinl such arbitrator.''] arbitration of the person -cufn-Managsng Director of \r person authorized by hir'n., io Suice fhe respondents even after receipt of notice of| days, the instant appucatioi^ arbitrator. |iave failed to appoint aii arbitrator Annexure A/ 14 after a period of 30 has been filed for apoom.tm.ent of Dr. N.K. Shukla, leamf|d uot dispute execution of the dispute has ariseii. between fb^ contains arbitration clause. Hle a sole arbitrator is appoiiited f): coiuisel for the respondents does. agreeiaent aiid also adinits fhat a parties out of Uie agreeinent which subinits tliat he has no objection if ar adjudication. offhe disputes. Siace fhe rcspondents despite being caUed upoa for appointiueilt of arbitrator is h^ |iave failed to appoint an arbitrator t^ie sam.e by the appUcailts, a case for to be niade out. In view of above, I, he|- S.K, Tiwari, Retired Judge op' residing at 27 KhoU, Vika| arbitrator, subject to his consdnt •eby, therefore, appoiut Hon'ble Mr. High Court of KoUcata, presently s Nagar, Bflaspur (C.G.) as sole XI-BC—78 3-E^- rf<|A||0<|, g.Tl1y'l<s, ISftfiiyy ..<rr?.^.c...'..c.;. .f.. sn^v w R-ii'* ^TSIT 3(T1^T sh^i^) WIRR'dfel 3)1^5T s C^T^fer4h 'RTR^if '£f,feEst'<F3i+$i< ^siRrir sfi^i ^y.^^. The learaed aTbitrator aad reiauneration. uiay setfle his ternis and conditions RegistiT to uitimate Hdn'ble Mr High Court of Kolkata, aboui send aU fh.e papers along wit] -. S.K. Tiwari, Retired Judge of his appomLtinent as arbitrator aad to |i address oftlie paities. Parties are also directell who is presently residuig at arid to siibniit papers ai^. proceeauigs. to approach Hon^le Mr. S.K. Tiwari, p7 KhoU, Vikas Nagar, Bilaspur (C.G.) jd to take part ia ttie arbiti-ation Sd/- : Dhirendra Mishrai Judge ^ ^ ^ ^