IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2007 / 8TH ASHADHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 919 of 2007(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.26709/2006 Dated 26/10/2006 .................... PETITIONER/(PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION): -------------------------------------------------------------- T.D. ANTHONY, PROPRIETOR, AGED 53 YEARS, ALPHY TRADERS, PUNNAMPARAMBU,THEKKUMKARA POST,THEKKUMKARA VILLAGE TALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.SAGEER IBRAHIM RESPONDENT: 1ST RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION: ------------------------------------------------- MR.VIJAYAKUMAR, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE (AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), WADAKKANCHERRY POST, THRISSUR DISTRICT. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L. DATTU, C.J. & K.T. SANKARAN, J. ---------------------------------------------------------- Cont. Case (C) No.919 of 2007 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 29th day of June, 2007 JUDGMENT H.L. DATTU, CJ. Alleging that the respondent has not complied with the orders and directions issued by this court in W.P.(C) No.26709/2006 dated 26.10.2006, the petitioner is before us in this contempt petition. 2. The respondent has filed a counter affidavit. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that whenever the petitioner requested for police protection, the same was extended to him. 4. In view of the above, in our opinion, there was substantial compliance of the orders and directions issued by this court. Therefore the contempt proceedings need not be continued. It is accordingly dropped. Ordered accordingly. H.L. DATTU, CHIEF JUSTICE. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE. mt/