IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 230 of 2008 Between: Dr.P.Udaya Bhasker, S/o.P.V. Subba Rao, R/o.F-3, Gowthami Appartmetns, Opp.Boat Club,Kakinada,E.G Dist ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Govt.of A.p, Rep.by its Principal Secretary,High Education Department, A.P.Secretariat,Hyderabad 2 The Govt.of A.p, Rep.by its Principal Secretary,Social Welfare Department, A.P.Secretariat,Hyderabad 3 The Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Kukatpally,Hyderabad-500085,Rep.by its Registrar 4 The Registrar, The Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Kukatpally,Hyderabad-500085 5 Prof.K.Rajgopal, Vice Chancellor The Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Kukatpally,Hyderabad-500085 .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the3rd respondent in initiating the recruitment process for ﬁling up of 82 teaching staﬀ posts that would be required only in the year 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 as arbitrary,malafide misque/misapplication of power improper violative of quota rules and thus violative of Article 14,16 of the constitution of Indaia and consquently set aside the notiﬁcation dt.7-11-2007 issued by the 3rd respondent and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.BALAJI VARMA Counsel for the Respondent : MR.B.ADINARAYANA RAO FOR R01.02.08,VAK-5 MR.K.RATHANGA PANI REDDY FOR R MR.S.SRI RAM FOR R GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION FOR RAPP MRGADDAM SRINIVAS FOR R The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: (Per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) Sri Ch. Pavan Kumar, Advocate representing Sri Balaji Varma, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner has submitted that during the pendency of the petition, due to the developments which have been taken place, the petition has become infructuous. The petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ _________________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 26th September, 2008. GRR