H§GH CGUgT QF CHHQTTEE’aGARH KT B§LA$P§J§§ Caram: Han’bEe Shri Qhireadm Misha‘a & Han’h5% Shii RN! ahaadmkan “U ‘E‘ax Casg NgAQ a? 2m)? AppeHam Union of India through Commissioner, Heard on amiication dated 20.09.2010 fiied by the respondent for diSpogai of Tax Case No.40/2007 in View cf the Finance Act, 201 0. 2. Learned couneei for the respondeni submits ihat in View of the reievant 'provisiens of the Finance Act, 2010, the respondent has aiready moved an application befere the Commissicner, Central Excise & Customs, Reipur eleng with necessary amount es mentioned in the anplication in connection with the preseni: matterand in View of the subsequent developmeni, the marker is still under consideraiion ef the Commissioner and, therefore, this appeai may be disposed of. 3. Learned oounsei for the appeilant submits thei he has no obiection if ‘rhe instant appeal is disposed of on ihe above prayer of the respondent. However, liberty may be reserved to the appellant in case the respondent does not comply with the amended provisions of the Finance Act, 201 O. 4. Acoordingiy, the application dated 20.00.2010 is aliowed. We record the submissions of the teamed counsel tot the parties as above and dispose of this tax appeai with the iiberty, as prayed for. V Sd/- Sdl- iDhirendra K R.N. Chandrakar Priya Judge Judge Central Excise and Custcms Cenfrai Excise Bhawén, Dhamatari Rcéd, Tikarapai'a, Raipur (CG) 492-001 Vs. Regpondem M/s Jayaswai Nece Limited, Siltiara‘, Raipur (CG) Present: Shri Bhis‘nma Kinger, couns&i for the appeliant. Shri Monish Panda, cetmsei fer the respontien‘i. GRAL JUDGEMENT ‘ (29.09201 0) Priya HgQH QOgdRT Q? QHQ‘LQTTESGARH AT BELASPUR Qm'am: Han’bEe Shri‘ Qhimadra Miwra & M Hcn’ble Shyi §¥d £§1andmka¥ Q Tax Ca3e NGAQ of 2%? Ange!iant Union Carma! of Excise India through and Customs, Commissioner, Central QRAL 3UDGEMENT ' (29.03.2010) Heard 0n appiication dated 20.09.2010 f€§ed by the respondent for diepesal o§ Tax Caee No.40/2007 ‘m View of the Finance Act, 201 O. 2. Learned counsel fer the respenden‘r submits that in View of the retevan’t provisions 0f the Finance Act, 2010, the respondent has already moved an aoplication before the Commissioner,-Central Excise & Customs, Raipur along with necessary amount as mentioned in the application in connection with the present matterand in View of the subsequent development, the matter is stiil under consideration ot the Commissioner and, theretore, this appeal 'rnay be disposed of. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that. he has no objection it the instant appeal is disposed of on the above prayer of the respondent. However, iiberty may be reserved to the appetlant in case the respondent does not comply with the amended provisions of the Finance Act, 201 O. 4. Acoordingiy, the application dated 20.09.2010 is allowed. We record the submissions of the learned Counsel for the parties as above and dispose of this tax appeal with the iiberty, as prayed for. // Excise (CG) 492-001 Tikarapafa, Raipur Vs. Resgomem Mis Jayaswai Neco Limited, RaipumCG) . Present: Shri Bhis‘nma Kingea’, counsel for the appeilant. counsei fer i%1e respondent. Shri Menish Panda, ‘ Sd/- . ‘ l Sd/- Chandrakar Dhirendra Mishra R.N. Judge Judge r , t