IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2918 of 2009 Date of decision:20.05.2009 Bhim Raj and another ...Petitioners versus Devinder Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr.Arvind Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. ----- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. The revision has been filed invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Rent Controller before whom the application for setting aside an ex parte order of eviction is pending. The urgency expressed by the learned counsel for the petitioners is that by some manipulation, the decree holder has taken possession of the property when there was a petition pending for setting aside an ex parte order. While I am not prepared to vouch for the correctness of the statement made by the counsel on behalf of the petitioners, having regard to the limited prayer that he makes that the petition pending before the Rent Controller under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC is to be disposed of at the earliest, I give such direction in the interest of justice that the Rent Controller shall dispose Civil Revision No.2918 of 2009 - 2 - of the the application which is pending before him within a period of two months from today, if the pleadings are complete. 2. The Civil Revision is, accordingly, disposed of. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 20.05.2009 sanjeev