IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 5395 of 2008 Date of Decision: April 7, 2008 Gram Panchayat Bhagwanpur …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Jaswant Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. M.M. KUMAR, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the case for some time and making submission that it has not been heard, applied for withdrawal of the writ petition in order to enable him to obtain information under the available provision of law to substantiate the aforementioned assertion. We have taken the aforementioned view on account of the bald statement made in the writ petition that no hearing has been given to the petitioner Gram Panchayat nor any notice has been served on the petitioner. Such a bald statement cannot be accepted because the petitioner has access to whole information under the C.W.P. No. 5395 of 2008 Right to Information Act, 2005. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondents for obtaining necessary information. If after obtaining information it is considered necessary then the petitioner would be at liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action. (M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE (SABINA) April 7, 2008 JUDGE Pkapoor 2