IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5287 of 2009 SHASHI BHUSHAN PRASAD Versus THE STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 2. 27.04.2009 Faced with the predicament that his own pleadings at paragraph 6 involved question of fact and claims under the Industrial Disputes Act when a daily wager holds no post and cannot lay out his claim in a writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw this application to pursue his remedy under the Industrial Disputes Act. It is for the petitioner to choose his remedy after the writ court has declined interference. This Court makes no observation with regard to the same. The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. Any proceeding before the Industrial Tribunal is to be decided in accordance with law uninfluenced by the refusal by this Court to interfere only because of the availability of an alternative statutory remedy to the petitioner. The order has been passed in presence of the counsel for the Bank. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)