IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-26146 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.09.2011 Sanjay and others . . .Petitioners Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Rampal Verma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Sagar Deswal, AAG, Haryana. Mr.Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate, for the complainant. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the State has pointed out from the Police record that injury No.1 on the part of Deepender has been declared to be grievous which is attributed to Sanjay (petitioner No.1). Insofar as petitioners No.2 to 7 are concerned, it is alleged that none of these petitioners have caused grievous injuries as all injuries attributed to them are simple in nature. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that Sanjay, Zile Singh & Om Parkash are also involved in another case bearing FIR No.23 dated 1.2.2011 registered under Sections 148, 149, 323 & 506 IPC, therefore, they should not be granted anticipatory bail. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. All the petitioners have allegedly joined the investigation. However, keeping in view the facts and circumstances that petitioner No.1 is attributed a grievous injury on the part of Deepender, therefore, anticipatory bail qua petitioner No.1 is hereby dismissed. The anticipatory bail with regard to rest of the petitioners, who have already joined the investigation, is hereby confirmed in terms of the order dated 30.8.2011 subject to the conditions already contained therein. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) SEPTEMBER 27, 2011 JUDGE Vivek