In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 5072 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision:September 05, 2009 Gulshan Lal ---Petitioner versus Narinder Kumar ---Respondent Coram: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA *** Present: Mr. Gorakh Nath,Advocate, for the petitioner *** SABINA J. Petitioner – Gulshan Lal has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 23.5.2009 passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Kurukshetra. Narinder Kumar-plaintiff has filed a suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction. Notice of the suit was issued to the defendant. After the close of evidence by the defendant, an application was moved by the petitioner-defen dant for permission to lead additional evidence(Annexure P-1). Vide the impugned order, the said application has been dismissed. Hence the present revision petition. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the present petition deserves to be dismissed. Civil Revision No. 5072 of 2009 (O&M) -2- Learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kurukshetra vide the impugned order has observed that sufficient opportunity had been granted to the defendant to lead his evidence. Thereafter, the defendant had closed his evidence. Now the application for permission to lead additional evidence has been filed with a view to fill up the lacuna in the case. With these observations the application for permission to lead additional evidence has been dismissed. The impugned order does not suffer from any material irregularity or infirmity which calls for any interference by this Court. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed. (SABINA) JUDGE September 05, 2009 PARAMJIT