IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.19206 of 2008 RAM BHAJAN RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 24.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The case is under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR was lodged against 8 to 9 unknown criminals with regard to an occurrence of dacoity, in which the criminals opened almirah and took away Rs.6,000/- ,which was the sale proceeds of bricks sold by the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 19.12.2007. Further submission is that the petitioner’s complicity is alleged on the ground of confessional statement of co-accused Dhumal Rai, who named the petitioner as one of his associates in commission of the crime. Learned counsel says that the petitioner has not been put on TIP nor there is any recovery from his possession. Mr. S. R. Haque, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State does not point out any other material 2 against the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Ram Bhajan Rai is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana at Motihari in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 89 of 2006. Kundan (C.M. Prasad, J.)