IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11283 of 2008 SUJEET KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. ----------- 4. 4.9.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as well as opposite party no.2. The petitioner is an accused for an offence under sections 494, 498A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that although the allegations have been levelled against the petitioner, but he is still ready to keep the informant with dignity. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 submits that the petitioner is in the habit of torturing the informant for the last many years and making the undue demand as alleged. The learned APP on going through the case diary submits that the witnesses have supported the case as alleged. Considering the submissions of the parties and in view of the nature of allegations as also the materials brought on record, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The application is, accordingly, dismissed. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)