IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.21 OF 2004 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.21 OF 2004 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.21 OF 2004 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.423 OF 1992 WRIT PETITION NO.423 OF 1992 WRIT PETITION NO.423 OF 1992 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders. order or directions and Registrar’s orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.V.K.Choudhary for the Appellants. CORAM : V.G. PALSHIKAR AND CORAM : V.G. PALSHIKAR AND CORAM : V.G. PALSHIKAR AND SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED : 10TH FEBRUARY 2005 DATED : 10TH FEBRUARY 2005 DATED : 10TH FEBRUARY 2005 . The impugned order is interlocutory order. Apart from the fact that it is so, it is passed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. No Letters Patent Appeal is maintainable against the orders passed under Article 227 as laid down by the judgments of the Supreme Court of India. Hence, Appeal dismissed. 2. The Appellants shall, however, be at liberty to raise the contention regarding same representation already on record in the original proceedings.