IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 20TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 29TH KARTHIKA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3477 of 2009() ------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 26/08/2009 IN CMP 6391/2009 IN ST.1249/2009 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, KOLENCHERRY .................... REVN. PETITIONER: --------------------- M.C.CHERIYAN, S/O.CHUMMAR, MATTUMMEL HOUSE, PUTHENCRUZ P.O., PUTHENCRUZE BY ADV. SRI.T.RAJESH RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. K.S.CHANDRAN, S/O.KUMARAN, SREENILAYAM, PUNALLUR, NOW RESIDING AT RAKHEE BHAVAN, TRIPUNITHURA, NADAMA VILLAGE, C.K.K.M, PHARMACEUTICALS TRIPUNITHURA. 2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RITHWIK THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.S.GOPINATHAN, J. ---------------------------------------- Crl.R.P.No.3477 of 2009 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of November, 2009 ORDER The revision petitioner is the accused in S.T.No.1249 of 2009 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Kolencherry. He applied for exemption from personal appearance before the trial court under Section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The learned magistrate by the order impugned dismissed the petition. The reason given in the order is that there is no affidavit filed by the revision petitioner stating that he would not dispute his identity and the genuineness of the orders passed by the court. I find that the reason given by the trial court is quite appropriate. It is not at all vitiated by any error, illegality or impropriety. I find no merit in the revision. Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the revision petitioner, to file a proper petition. P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE Skj.