IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17504 of 2009 MD.MINHAJUL HODA, S/o Md. Serajul Hoda, resident of Village-P.O.- Kakodha, P.S.-Sakatpur, District-Darbhanga. .............Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Balbhadrapur, Laheriasarai, Darbhanga, through its member. 3. Block Education Officer, Tardih at Manigachhi-2, District-Darbhanga. 4. Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj-Kaithwar, Block-Tardih, District-Darbhanga. 5. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj-Kaithwar, Block-Tardih, District- Darbhanga. 6. Anjum Ara Khatoon, W/o Md. Kukhtar Ahmad Sidhque, resident of village+P.O.-Kakodha, P.S.-Sakatipur, District-Darbhanga. 7. Gajendra Ishwar, S/o Shri Govind Ishwar, the then Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj-Kaithwar, Tardih at present on Deputation in Block Headquarter, Tardih, District-Darbhanga. 8. Ramashray Rai, the then B.E.O. at present Area Officer, Mushahari, District-Muzaffarpur. ...............Respondents. ----------- 2/ 09.04.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the State. Petitioner’s prayer is for quashing of the order dated 26.10.2009 passed by District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner has been rejected. Petitioner has alleged that the Mukhiya in connivance with the Block Development Officer has illegally changed the roster point and issued letters of appointment in favour of candidates, excluding the name of petitioner. Petitioner’s claim is that he was selected for the post of Panchayat Teacher reserved for Urdu Teacher at roster point 47. But subsequently, on the basis of forged documents another 2 panel of selected candidates was prepared, changing the roster points and respondent No. 6, Anjum Ara Khatoon was appointed on the post reserved for Urdu Teacher. On perusal of the proceedings of the Appointment Committee, annexed as Annexure-10, it transpires that the roster as indicated by the petitioner is not the correct roster point. The appellate order also indicates that the correct roster point is same as indicated in Annexure-10. The impugned order also indicates that the then Panchayat Secretary, Gajendra Ishwar, in connivance with the Block Education Extension Officer, Tardih at Manigachhi-2 and the father of the petitioner, had manufactured documents and on the basis of such documents petitioner name was shown in the list of selected candidates, for the post of reserved Urdu Teacher. The appellate Tribunal has discussed in detail all the documents brought before the Tribunal by the petitioner as well as the opposite parties. On consideration of the impugned order passed by the Appellate Tribunal, I find that the petitioner has not been able to make out a case for interference by this Court. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)