1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5445 OF 2009 [Kalpana Sopanrao Bhingare Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.N.J.Pahune Patil,Advocate for Petitioner Shri. V.B.Ghatge, A.G.P. for Respondent- State. Smt. Manjusha A. Deshpande,Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. .... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 12TH AUGUST, 2010. PER COURT : 1. The petitioner participated in the interview procedure held for “Anganwandi Worker”. The grievance of the petitioner is that concerned MLA and Sabhapati gave excessive marks in favour of the selected candidate Sau. Jyoti Dattatrya Kankate @ Jyoti Ramchandra Dhatrat. 2. Mr. Pahune Patil, learned counsel for 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders the petitioner submits that petitioner is more qualified and competent than the selected candidate. 4. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. Perused affidavit-in-reply filed by the respondent Nos.2 and 3. We do not notice any glaring error to exercise our extra ordinary writ jurisdiction. In the facts of the case, no interference is called for. The Writ Petition stands rejected. Sd/- Sd/- [K.K. TATED, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] MTK