1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1676/2008 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 2208/2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1677/2008 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 2329/2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1678/2008 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 2333/2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1679/2008 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 2335/2008 _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office } Memoranda of Coram, } Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's } orders or directions } and Registrar's orders } ___________________________}___________________________________ Shri D.V. Tele , A.G.P. for petitioner Shri S.L. Bhapkar, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. ........................... [CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J ] DATE : 10th FEBRUARY, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Heard learned A.G.P. Mr. Tele for the appellant and M. Bhapkar learned 2 counsel for respondents no.1 and 2 / claimants. 2 In all these four matters, there is delay of 610 days caused in filing appeal. The state feels aggrieved by excessive enhancement effected by learned Reference Court from Rs.141/- to Rs.183/- per R. The Reference Court has enhanced it to the sum of Rs. 600/- per R. The delay in preferring appeal is not deliberate. The same is sufficiently explained. The rights of the appellant need not scatter for the latches of the officer. Consequently, delay is condoned. 3 Mr. Bhapkar waives service of notice in appeal for respective claimants / respondents. 4 Call record and proceedings. 5 S.O. to 24th June, 2010. 6 Rule is made absolute. [ K.U. CHANDIWAL, J ] tsk/ca1676.08