^-^^-^-^-^-•u-Y-^-^V-^'u'L-y-^^-^-^. 1N THE H1GH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR A N.A. N0. CHHATT?SGARH ^[60 / 2005 .Dlvisjon Bench APPELLANT j-kort . A^pLt cA-rtT J)erryianand Sahu, Aged about 32 years, S/o. Punitram Sahu, R/o. Jait Road, Mahasamund, Distt- Mahasamund (C.G.), Through Niharika Video House Bazar Ward, Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS /- RESPONDENTS ^tMMA-MH ^^ ^ ^? Brijial Sahu S/o. Late Nangal Sahu, Aged about 44 years, Devki Bai D/o. Shri Brijlai Sahu, Aged about 20 years, 3» CtihablSat Sahu, S/o. Sftri Brijla) Sahu, ^ ^ Aged about 18 years, Tejram Sahu, Sp/ Brijtal Sahu. Aged about 11 years, Hemant Kumar Satiu S/o. Shri Brijtat Sahu, 1\ ^/ Aged about 9 years, ^' ^ ^9 6] /" Ku. Divya Sahu, D/o. Brijla! Sahu, Aged about 7 years, Resp.No.^-fe 6 are Tninor, through their guardian- father Shri Brijiaf Sahu (Resp.No.1) Ai{ above are R/o. Machhli Bazar, Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) Jeevanlal Yadav, S/o. Mannulal Yadav, Aged about 21 years, WOL Gudmpara, Mahasamund, Disft Mahasamund (C.G.) Manoj Kant Sahu S/o. Late Ramsevak Sahu, R/o. Marghat Road, l^ahasamund, P.S. & Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) Through: Mahasamund Provision Stores BazarWard, Mahasamund (C.G.) te^""' APPEAL UNDER SECT10N ir73 OF iiaOTOR VEH1CLE ACT Ciaim in appeai vaiued at Rs. 1,22,000/- Berng aggrieved by award dated 20.T2.2004, passed by ^econd Additional Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Mahasamund, District Mahasaniund 8] -/ 3n^r^t^i4) WT 3<i^i sr»*iict» [. ^N^^.^. c '?''<efe;i$<!.>- :^K ;'* K' c smi: ^sa^ ^ *ijN<e'sr ~5^ T^WW^, v>-^\w\<o, f®ldiy^< y^- n^ g^o/os- ""•""""""'""^ 200 »«iien ^n^r TRW (^I^^) ^Kll^R « a<ail^l SB: HON. SHRI JU^TIOfc N.K. AOARWJ^ 9-3-2010 ShriManoj Paranjpe, Shii Aml Pandey witjh respondei^s No. 1 to 6. SIffiTaranjpe submi^ * *<ftomhfewlient, maximum GI»l<lfCT<fll *11^<3lf ^ Fs^i <[^t^l< '^3fRPT3n^ff Advocate, for the appellant. Smt. Anita. Shrivastava, Adv. for |;s fhat as per iiistructions received ^uaaount has already been deposited by fh^^iypellant and there|fore, he does not want to press this appeal. Shn, Pandey also si^bmits fhat he does not press the counter appeal. In yiew °f above counter. a.t)peal are dismis^ iubmissions, fhe appeal and the led as not pressed. Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge ?m€t^f^V ^CTTOT, <R^f<{^—FS/l47—2/2010 —1,00,000.