IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 667 of 1989 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- JASWANT GANDALAL SHAH Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR DM THAKKAR for Petitioner MR PK PANCHOLI for Respondent No. 1, 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 14/03/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT #. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any merits in this special civil application. The contravention made by petitioner of clause 18(1) of the Gujarat Essential Commodities (Licence, Control & Stock Declaration) Order, 1981 and condition No.6(3)(b) of the Licence is clearly established. It is a finding of fact recorded by both the authorities that the petitioner has sold the stock of edible oil by charging 62 paise per tin more in addition to permitted profit margin at the rate of one percent. I do not find any perversity in the finding of fact recorded by both the authorities below. Otherwise also, the learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to make out any case for interference of this court. #. In the result, this special civil application fails and the same is dismissed. Rule discharged. Interim relief, if any, granted by this court stands vacated. No order as to costs. ....... (sunil)