IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30034 of 2008 SATENDRA PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 17.9.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The anticipatory bail application of petitioner was earlier rejected by this court vide order dated 16.1.2007 in Cr. Misc. No. 56081 of 2006. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has renewed his prayer for anticipatory bail on the grounds that the petitioner is suffering from different ailments and in support of the same, he has brought on record certificates of Indira Gandhi Institutue of Medical Sciences, Patna as well as of P. M. C. H., Patna. He submits that other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail and the main assailant has been granted regular bail. He submits that apart from the FIR other witnesses in course of investigation have made no specific allegation against him. Learned counsel for the State submits that there is specific allegation against him in the FIR. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this court does not find any reason to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. However, if petitioner surrenders and pray for regular bail within six weeks from today, the same will be disposed of on his own merit without being prejudiced by this order. DKS/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J)