*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 12. + W.P.(C) 3381/2005 % M.S.SHOES EAST LTD. . .... Petitioner Through Ms.Sarika Singh, Advocate. versus UOI & ORS. . .... Respondent Through Mr.Sanjay Katya!, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER 01.12.2006 We have perused prayer (c) in W.P.(C) 8315/2002 and the only prayer made in W.P.(C) 3381/2005. Both are identical in essentials. Since the same prayer is already being considered in WP(C) 8315/2002, we do not see why we should entertain another writ petition seeking the same relief. Accordingly, W.P.(C) 3381/2005 is dismissed. Rule DB has already been issued in W.P.(C) 8315/2002. list W.P.(C) 8315/2002 in regul.');_rse. DECEMBER 01, 2006 dn VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J . S. MURALIDHAR, J ,o Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Signing Date:04.09.2023 14:59 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified