IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 1803 of 2009 Between: Bangaru Srirama Naga Prasad Gupta, S/o. Ranganadham, R/o. D.No. 3A-7-14, Thootavari Street, Main Bazar, Eluru, West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, West Godavari, Eluru. 2 The Sub Inspector of Police, Eluru I Town Police Station, Eluru, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, direction, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in summoning the petitioner to the police station frequently and harassing him by insisting to discharge the debt amounts to his creditors without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, malafide, ultra virus apart from deprivation of his right of personal liberty guaranteed under article 21 of Constitution of the and consequentially direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere with the petitioners' person liberty and day to day life in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MRKAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.1803 of 2009 Order: This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the second respondent in summoning the petitioner to the police station frequently and harassing him by insisting to discharge the debt amounts to his creditors, without there being any justifiable reason. The second respondent filed a counter affidavit denying all the allegations made by the petitioner. It is categorically stated that the second respondent has not registered any case against the petitioner and that he is neither summoning the petitioner to the police station nor harassing him by insisting to discharge the debt amounts. In view of the specific stand taken by the respondents in their counter affidavit, no further adjudication is necessary in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly closed. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 05.03.2009 VGB