24 # %. 25.08.2010 Present: Mr. Surinder Kumar and Ms. Jyostna Gupta, Advs. for the petitioners along with petitioners in person. Mr. U.L. Watwani, APP for the State with SI Ajay Gupta, P.S. S.B. Dairy. Respondent no. 2 in person. +Crl. M.C. 2673/2010 * Due to bursting of crackers by the petitioners injuries were received by the son of respondent no. 2. Accordingly, on the complaint of respondent no. 2, FIR No. 81/2010 under Sections 326/34 IPG was registered at Police Station Shahbad Dairy against the petitioners. Now, petitioners and respondent no. 2 have compromised their matter inasmuch as, they want to maintain harmonious relations in future. In terms of the settlement a sum of^1 lakh has been paid to the respondent no. 2 by the petitioners in order to compensate his son on account of injuries received by him. In view of the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably, I am of the view that no fruitful purpose would be Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified served in compelling tiie parties to continue to litigate a protracted trial. Accordingly, in the larger interest, I quash the FIR No. 81/2010 under Sections 326/34 IPG registered at Police Station Shahbad Dairy and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. August 25, 2010 ga A.K. PATHAK, J.