IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 19TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 30TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 5604 of 2008(P) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ P.K.HASSAINAR, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.KHADER, PITHUKKARA HOUSE, P.O.THENGODU, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.SANJAY SRI.A.PARVATHI MENON RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE TAHSILDAR (LA), ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI D. ANILKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P(C) NO.5604 OF 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 19th day of February, 2008 J U D G M E N T -------------------- The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to quash the Rehabilitation Package Scheme prepared by the District Collector, Ernakulam. It is seen that the petitioner has filed Exhibit P2 representation before the District Collector raising very serious allegations regarding the Package. It was further pointed out that several cases, if it is true, require very serious consideration. Learned Government Pleader submitted that the District Collector had received Exhibit P2. 2. Considering all aspects of the matter, I am of the view that it is only just and proper that the District Collector takes a decision on Exhibit P2 before taking any final decision regarding the Package Scheme. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Collector, Ernakulam to consider and dispose of Exhibit P2 representation filed by the petitioner on 4.2.2008 in accordance with the Rules with due notice to the W.P(C) NO.5604 OF 2008 -: 2 :- petitioner also, as expeditiously as possible. Thereafter only the District Collector shall finalise the Rehabilitation Package Scheme. I make it clear that the judgment in this Writ Petition will not be a bar for the petitioner to challenge the order to be passed by the District Collector, if he is aggrieved by the same. I make it further clear that all other contentions raised by the petitioner in this Writ Petition are left open to be decided in appropriate proceedings. K. PADMANABHAN NAIR, JUDGE. vsv K. PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. ===================== W.P(C) NO.5604 OF 2008 ===================== J U D G M E N T ------------------------------------------- 19TH FEBRUARY, 2008