IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 15505 of 2009 Between: Gunji Venkanna S/o Nagaiah Hindu G.Kothapalli,Dwaraka Triumala(M) West Godavari District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of A.P Revenue Department rep.by its Secretary,Hyderabad 2 The Joint Collector W.G District,Eluru 3 The Tahsildar Dwaraka Tirumnala(M) W.G Disrict 4 Smt.Andugula Nagamma W/o Ramulu Hindu, C/o Andugula Bheemaiah Dwaraka Tirumala (M) W. G District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ,order direction more particularly one in the nature writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondent No 2 herein in not register the Revision petition as well as stay petition and dispose them as per as early as possible which were filed by the petitioner on 25-06-2009 against the orders of the RDO Eluru passed in Roc No 1473/2008(D) dated 08-06-2009 and consequentional Respondent not to dispossess the petitioner from the from the disputed land in RS NO 232/p of G.Kothapalli(V) Dwarka Tirumala(M) W.G Distrrict until disposal of the Revision petition pending before the Joint Collector(2nd Respondent) in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.K.J.V.N.PUNDAREEKAKSHUDU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.NO.15505 OF 2009 ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignment) for respondents 1 to 3. The writ petition is filed on a grievance that the 2nd respondent has neither registered the revision preferred by the petitioner nor considered the application for interim relief filed therein, on 25-06- 2009. On the representation of the 4th respondent the petitioner’s step- sister, the 3rd respondent- the RDO, Eluru enquired into the respective claims of the 4th respondent and the petitioner as to entitlement to possession of Ac.200 in R.S.No.232 of G.Kothapalli Village, Dwaraka Tirumla Mandal, West Godavari District and held that earlier on 01-06- 1978 the 4th respondent was granted D-Form patta evidencing by patta No.681, dated 05.03.2007 and for the same property D-Form patta was granted on 12-09-1986 to the petitioner. The Revenue Divisional Officer also observed that originally the father of the petitioner and the 4th respondent-one Ganji Nagaiah had illegally occupied the land and continued in its cultivation. On his death, the petitioner and the 4th respondent are equally entitled inherit Nagaiah’s entitlement and therefore the assignment ought to have made equitably, of Ac.1.00 each to the petitioner and the 4th respondent. On this conclusion the Revenue Divisional Officer cancelled the D-Form patta granted to the 4th respondent on 01-06-1978 and to the petitioner on 12-09-1986 and directed the 3rd respondent to grant fresh pattas of Ac.1.00 each to the petitioner and the 4th respondent in RS No.232 of G.Kothapalli Village. Against this order, the petitioner preferred a revision to the 2nd respondent on 25-06-2009 and complains herein that the 2nd respondent has neither taking cognizance of the revision nor considered the application for interim relief filed therein. In the facts and circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission directing the 2nd respondent to expeditiously consider the revision preferred by the petitioner on 25-06- 2009 and in any event within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, consider and pass orders on the application for interim relief filed therein. No costs. _________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 31st JULY, 2009. *TSNR