SSM 1 41.wp.509.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 509 OF 2011 Manohar Maruti Khamakar ....Petitioner Versus Mahadeo Kuklkarni and others ....Respondents ______ Mr. U. R. Mankapure, for the Petitioner. CORAM: B. R. GAVAI, J. DATED : 23 rd FEBRUARY, 2011. P.C.: By this Petition, the Petitioner challenges the order dated 20 th October, 2008, by which an application filed by the present Petitioner for amendment of written statement came to be rejected. 2. Admittedly, the trial has commenced and the suit is at the stage of cross examination of the Plaintiff. The amendment which is sought, pertains to a document of 1967. As such as the Petitioner exercised due diligence, he has brought such matter on record, prior to commencement of trial. The scope of interference under Article SSM 2 41.wp.509.11 227 of the Constitution of India is very limited. Unless it is found that the discretion exercised by the learned Trial Court is found to have been exercised in the perverse manner, it would not be permissible for this Court to interference with the same. I am not inclined to entertain the present Petition in the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 4. In that view of the matter, no interference is warranted. Rejected. (B. R. GAVAI, J.)