l^ ;.. •< Al " T'Ei% 1 -'—~^::\'>^^{..Ji""' THE HON'BLE STAT^ ^ ADMINSSTR^TiV^.^RtByNAL. '" li -'' • t \^-1-* t- \ ^^ ^ G.R. S/'o Late Shri D.Gyan Das, R/o Jantacoiony, Gudiyari, .Ralpur 1. ^State of Chhattlsgarh, 'Throuah: ^^^^^' Water Resources Depa'rtment, D.K. Bhavan, Ralpur. 2/ Superintendent Engineer (Admn.) O/o: Engineer in Chief, Water Resources Department, Raipur. y Executive Engineer, (E&M), Water Resources Department, Raipur (CG) \ ^^- i^^OJSU^- ,,, \ qA^|io^r^Tr;<3USIO'/to2 M-:'''"^RA!pupi.^—— r..Y)/-.l '•' " './';"'/ Applicant Respondents APPUCATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE ADEVISNISTRATiVE TRIBUNAL_ACTJ985 /: )' XI-HC-78 HIHWI St>*11<h 3^cT rqiqid^, ^Tfl'M4!^ RtcrtWy _^^hfcM^^A^~ ^200 3TT^?T^T$RRt (^Gii^qq^T) 3T^T^)Tf^TW cW3TT^Tsb^I<=h ^RTT^K^rf?cT3TT^?T 14,6,2006 Mr. N.K, Vyas, Advocate f<| Mrs, Chitt-a Shrivastava, I| waiit to press I.A. No.895/06 & State of M,P, as rcspondenl <=bi^f<n41Ti ^iH<nT^'*te^t'<[^<^i< ^^ri^T3TT^T >r the petitioner, '.L. for the State. Heard, Learaied counsel for tlie ^etitioner subraitted tliat he does not ed for joiiiiag the Uuion of India aad s. Accorduigly, fhe appUcation is disinissed as not pressed, By fhis petition, the pelpitioner has questioned the legality, onier dated 20.12.2001 (Aimexure No.3- Executive Engineer, Water aad also oider dated 21.08.2001 ludent No,2-Superiiitendiiig Engiiieer propriety and correctaess of th| A-l) passed by respondent Resources Department, Raipui] (Annexure A-2) passed by respc^ (Adnin,), Water Resozu'ccs Ipepai'tmient, Raipur whereby flie appUcation offh.e petitioner for graat of coiapassionate appoiatment has been rejected on fhe gro^ind fhat there is no provision for corapassionate appotatment to t|fae heirs ofwork charged employees, The case of fhe petitione| Work-charged eiaployee on the 10.10.1999, therefore, he appU^ 10.12.1999. The Govemment ^ scheme dated 10.6.1994 foit thereafter it was revised on 1.51 The pay scale of the petitionerl r is tliat his father was workiag as post of Wire Man aad he expircd on d for coinpassionate appoiataient on »ferstwhUe State of M.P. frained ffae coinpassionate appoiatment aad 2000, The petitioner's father naaiely Late Shri D, Gyandawas appoi4.ted as Wire-man ta the year 1987 ia the office of Supermtendmg En^ineer, Inigation Department, Raipiir, s father was revised to Rs.3050-75- XI-HC-78 3^T ^TNI^RT, ^ftWT^, |s|<n l^y Ul^dl sb*<|cb *«****»*»»***»*** • * * * ^ 200 311^114s(tb (11^3^8r) s"^ ^TT^T^rf^ri^ TOTW^T^TT^ ?^TTW^rf?cTW^T 'z"l Gtovenliment 3950-80-4590/- by the 1999 fhe petitioner's fafher wa^ Rs.1082/- as D.A., total s^l 10.10.1999 9iid death certificat his father the petitioner applie<{ application dated 10.12.1999J niember in the faniUy who is f4tfi compassionate appouitmient, In flie retm-n filed by tiit that fhe Chief Engiaeer, Wat^ dated 18.10.2001 mformed tha|t no scope for conipassionate ap]^< employees. Havmg hearcl leanied co| the scheine issued by flie GCIK State of M,P. dated 1.3.1994 4 tp the hetrs of ti.ie goveniBie^it Clazise-11 of the schenie work-charged/conttagency pa| members of such employee appomtaient, but their conditions of Workcharged/ CoK|tb When fhe petitioner's fattj ia force and when fhe appomtmenton 10.12.1999at and when the appUcation of <=bl^Id41^,^1l^dT ^*te^ <Rl^l< ^3T^T3TI^T ofM,P. In tlie monfh ofApril, drawmg basic pay ofRs,3875/- aiid lary of Rs.4945/-. He expu'ed on e is Aiinexure A-5. After the deafh of for compassionate appointomi.ent vide as at fhat time he was the only pfillmg all fhe quallfications to get the respondents it has been mentioned ?r Resoiirces Department vide letter as per policy dated 1.5,2000 tliere is »ointmentoffhe heu's ofwork charged ^insel for the parties, I have perused |ral Adniinistrative Departaient of fhe sgarduig coiapassionate appouitaient employees who died ia hamess. provides tiiat on the death of spec^fically appo^iitaieiit |d eniployees, one of the family ^haU be eligible for compassionate shall be made under fhe (tmgency Fiind Ser^ices, ^r died on 10.10. 1999 fhis poUcy was applied for compassionate piat tmie also this poUcy was ta force ^ie petitioner for compassionate was pe^itioner XI-HC-78 3^T^l^l^^, ^^^(o, (^crtl^y ^INdlsh*<|cb -*«---•«*-« *<*t * ^ 200 3ii^iM5<cn 3TT^T^)lR^i4) cCT'3TR^Tsh^lcb 'l^ g^TTW^TW^T ^ orders thelre nieidbers under process, the Geueral ei-stwhile Govt. of M,R reviseA appointment vide order dated| was made for conipassionate 4] tlie workcharged/contiagency Therefore, under the above consider tlie application of| appoiatoient. But fhe iaipugne^. facie perverse aad iUegal, for petitioner died on 10.10,19^ application for coinpassionate of fhe yeai' 1994 iii wliich appoHitaient of the family paid eiaployees, fhe respond| appUcation of fhe petitioner poUcy issued in the year 1994,| deafh of petitioner's fafher appUcation, It is torue that as p| entitled for coBipassionate contingency fiuid service requireiTcut is fhat a.ppohitm.e^.t the fhtrd requirement is fliat coBipassionate appoiatraent. In the reszilt, the orde|r passed by respondeiit No.3- Department, Raipur aad posjt, ord^r cbl^I<"l4iT1 ^ll^^t ^*fe1^ <Rt<^K ^3Tf^T3:T[^T Adiojiiistration Departaient of the flie poUcy regardiag conipassionate 1.5.2000 and ui which no provision IppoiiitDient of the faBiUy menibers of [paid employee, who died ui haniess. tiie respondents have refused to tlie petitioner for eonipassionate orders ofthe respondents are prmia- Ithe reasons that wheii the fatlier of ^9 aad when fhe petitiouer made |ippomtment on 10.12,1999, tlie policy was a provision for conipassionate offlie work charged/contiagency mts were reqiiired to consider the |iii accordaace witli fhe goveninient which was io. existeuce at fhe time of |aad when tiie petitioner filed tlie ;r poUcy of 1994 the petitioner wiU be only for tlie work chai'ged/ ap^oiatment if same is avaUable. The second ^^\-^<^AA.Y< shall be made on the s^saye post and 4ie mcumbent m.ust be eUgible for the dated 20.12.2001 (Ann.exiire A-l) ;xecutive Engiaeer, Water Resources dated 21.08.2001 (Aiinexurc A-2) XI-HC-78 3^ ^iNKn^, ^Tf1<H^<o, Rcni^y --"-5'7- *ii*idi a»*iicr> ^ 200 STT^Tq^BF 3:n^T^>T^ich ^T 5f)^1<=h y/ ^' ^cn'^K^cr^Ti^T ^ ,.'d passed by respondent No,2-S Resoiirces Departiiient, Radipit consider tlie application o appomtaient m accordaiice 1.3.1994 -? Wifli fhe aforesaid, the j)etition staiids disposccl of Certi&ed copy as per ru|es. cbi<if<n41ri ^i^^iTfftel^<Ri<^i< ^3Tf^T3^T iiperintendmg Engiaeer (Admn.), Water |r are quashed aiid fhey are directed to ^ the petitiouer for compassionate with Uie govenixn.ent policy dated Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge