IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD FEBRUARY 2010 / 14TH MAGHA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 1298 of 2009(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.19986/2001 Dated 07/08/2008 .................... PETITIONER: --------------- C.RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 63, S/O. CHANDRABHANU, (RETD. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES), "MALAYA", SREEKARYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.KHALID SRI.N.GOPINATHA PANICKER SRI.T.P.SAJID SMT.P.S.MAHESWARI RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT: --------------- DR.P.PRABHAKARAN, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), PRINCIPAL SECRETARY/ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FISHERIES AND PORTS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY G.P. SRI.LAKSHMI NARAYAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... C.O.C. No.1298 of 2009 .................................................................... Dated this the 3rd day of February, 2010. JUDGMENT Heard counsel for the petitioner and Government Pleader for the respondents. Admittedly Annexure-II is issued by the Government as a follow-up action based on judgment in the W.P.(C). The petitioner still claims to be aggrieved by the order issued by the Government on 19.8.2009. I do not think petitioner's grievance against the Government order issued pursuant to judgment could be settled in contempt proceedings. If petitioner has grievance, it is upto the petitioner to challenge the order of the Government. However, since the Government has complied with the direction of this court, there is no contempt and Contempt Case is, therefore, closed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms