IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE 31st DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6044 OF 2010 Between: K.S.K.V.Prasada Rao … Petitioner And k.Venkata Naveen and others … Respondents This Court made the following: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6044 OF 2010 ORDER: - This revision under Article 227 of the Constitution complaining inaction on the part of V Additional District Judge, Mahila Sessions court, Vijaawada in disposing of I.A.No.763 of 2009 in O.S.No.59 of 2006, which was filed for temporary injunction. Admittedly, the injunction application itself was filed in the month of June, 2008 before II Additional District Judge, Krishna, Vijaawada, which was later transferred to the Court of V Additional District Judge, Mahila Court, Vijayawada in the year 2009. The petitioner who is the respondent/defendant in the said I.A. filed a counter expressing no objection for grant of injunction. Since the suit is filed for partition of the plaint schedule properties, the petitioner moved this court contending that the said I.A. has not been disposed of. There is no explanation forthcoming as to what prevented the petitioner from moving an application seeking to advance the hearing of the petition before the trial court. Merely because lawyers are going on strike from October 2010 onwards, cannot be a ground to grant injunction, which was not granted by the trial court nor the petitioner has made any endeavour in that regard. Therefore, this Court does not find any merit to entertain the present revision. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. However, the V Additional District Judge, Vijayawada, before whom the said I.A. is pending, is directed to dispose of the same within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if not already disposed of. If the advocates are not cooperating, he can pass ex parte orders basing on the material available on record. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J December 31, 2010 lmv