1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 331/ 2010 (Preeti Pravin Dudhe vs. State of Maharashtra and another ) ................................................................................................................................................................... .. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. N S Khandewale, Adv. for applicant Mr Bhagde, APP for Res. No.1 CORAM : A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATED : 2 nd September, 2010. 1. Heard learned Advocate for the applicant. My attention has been invited to the order granting anticipatory bail in favour of Respondent No.2-Pravin Moreshwar Dudhe. Anticipatory bail order dated 30.10.2006 appears to have merged into the order dated 14.11.2006 after the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, 9th Court, Nagpur granted bail to the accused in RCC No. 3781 /2006, upon depositing cash security to the tune of Rs. 2000/- by each of them; and upon executing PR bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- each. 2. It is now the grievance of the learned Advocate for the applicant that the conditions of bail have been violated and, as such, bail is required to be cancelled. According to learned Advocate for the applicant after getting regular bail, the Respondent no.2 went abroad i.e London and never appeared before the trial Court. It is further grievance of the applicant that the respondent 2 no.2 -Praveen is enjoying his life with his girl friend at London, and dodging the process of the Court. The trial Court had issued warrants against respondent no.2; however, he is not paying any heed to it. Furthermore, the trial Court could not be able to frame charge against the accused as he did not appear on the date fixed. Learned Advocate for the applicant states that he did not move with identical relief for cancellation of bail in the trial Court. This Court is of the opinion that the learned JMFC 9th Court, Nagpur before whom RCC No. 3781 / 2006 is pending, can take coercive and stringent steps including that of issuance of warrant, proclamation, attachment of property etc. so also cancellation of bail against the accused who violated the bail order and is avoiding to attend the Court. 3. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants prays for withdrawal of the application, with liberty to approach the trial Court. 4. With the above observations, the application is allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Sahare