1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO.1257 OF 2009 (Radhikabai Vachist Ghadge and others vs. Shivaji Banshi Jaybhay and another) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.S.Thombre, Adv., for the appellant. Mr. S.G.Jadhavar, Adv., for respondent no.2. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:20/1/2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. The Commissioner, Workmens Compensation and Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ambejogai, by order dt.18.2.2009, dismissed the petition where the legal representatives of the petitioner sought compensation due to loss of deceased, aged 50 years. The findings recorded by the learned Judge exonerating original respondent no.1 Shivaji or the owner of the well Baburao needs interference. He has not assigned 2 reasons as to what made him to dismiss the claim against respondent no.2 Baburao, the owner of the well. The learned Judge has to give clear finding as to nature of contract, if any, about the employer-employee relationship, either between Baburao or with Shivaji. 3. In the scenario, the order under challenge is set aside. The matter is remitted to the learned Judge to decide afresh. Exercise to be done within six months from today. Parties to appear before the learned Judge on 9th Feb.,2010. Send R & P at the earliest. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/1257-09fa