IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6700 of 2011 SMT.MAMTA DEVI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 02. 19.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and for the State Election Commission. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that her age is wrongly recorded as 18 years in the voters list prepared for the Panchayat Election 2011. The District Panchayati Raj Officer has already written to the Returning Officer in this regard, but the Returning Officer is not looking into contemporaneous documents. Entries of age in the voters list are not conclusive. On the acceptance of her nomination is being denied on grounds of age. Learned counsel for the Commission fairly submits that the Commission has already issued instructions by Letter No. 635 dated 10.2.2011 that in cases of alleged discrepancy in age recorded in the voters list, contemporaneous documents in proof of age as mentioned in the order may be taken into consideration. The writ application stands disposed in the aforesaid terms for an expeditious decision by the Returning Officer so that the petitioner is not non-suited by delay in decision making of the Returning Officer in view of the elections scheduled to be held on 30th of April, 2011. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)