^o^. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BltASPUR: CHHATTISGARH SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, C.J. WRIT PETITION N0.4705 of 2006. PEmiQNER Versus RESPONDENT Rohit Kumar @ Chaitram, S/o. Dilip Singh, aged about - 38 years. Caste: Agharia R/o: Vlllage: Dhangaon Tehsil: Sarangarh, Distt.: Raigarh (C.G.) Tikeshwari Patel @ Basant W/o. Rohtt Kumar aged about - 35 years. AtPresent R/o: Village: Bar, Post: Bar P.S. Saria, Tehsil: Sarangarh, Distt.: Raigarh (C.G.) Present: Shri N.K. Chatterjee, counsel for the petitioner (ORAL ORDER) (Passed on 30th August, 2006) This writ petitfon arises out of interim maintenance granted by ttie learned family judge. The leamed family judge by the impugned order passed under Sech'on 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act has awarded Rs.3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand only) towards litigation expenses and Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand Only) per month towards maintenance from the date of filing of the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. (2) The only submission of leamed counsel for the petiUoner- husband is that the petitioner himself is an agricultural coolie and he has to work out his livelihood by labour, and he has no other means and that he is not in a position to pay any maintenance to the wife. That is the only submission made by leamed counsel for the petitioner. The mamage between the parties is not disputed. It is also not the case of the petitioner that the respondent-wfe has any other source of income to support her life. If this is the admitted position, 1 cannot take any objwtfon to the impugned order made by the leamed famity judge awarding monthly maintenance at the rate of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand only). A sum of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand only) in the present time and place is most minimal to support a human life. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. No costs. Sd/- ChiefJustice