IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA FIRST APPEAL NO. 142 OF 2006 SHRI ANAND R. NAIK, PANAJI GOA. ....Appellant Versus CAPTAIN OF PORT AND ANR., ....Respondents Mr. D.P. Bhise, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. S.S. Kantak, AG with Ms. R. Chodankar, AGA for respondents. Coram:- J. N. PATEL, J. Date:- 14th December, 2006 P.C. 1. The learned Counsel for the appellant does not seek to prosecute the appeal, for the reasons that the case of the appellant has already been considered for pay fixation in terms of Government Order No.8/1/93/Fin(R & C)Part I dated 11.4.2001. In view of this, the appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal for which the respondents have no objection. 2. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. The appellant shall be entitled for refund of Court fee if any, as permissible under the law. J. N. PATEL, J. ef.