IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6965 of 2011 Decided on: 25th August, 2011. Kavita Sharma … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. V.B. Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by her transfer. According to the petitioner, she has not made a `request for transfer and yet the order shows that the transfer is without TTA. Be that as it may. According to the petitioner, there are several vacancies available at nearby places and they are referred to in Annexures P-3 and P-4. It is further submitted by the petitioner that she has filed a representation and the same is pending before the Director. There will be a direction to the Director to look into the representation filed by the petitioner and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. In the 2 meanwhile, the petitioner may not be compelled to join the transferred station and it will be open to her to avail the leave of the kind due. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 25th August, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (tr) Judge. 3