FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ CP/329/2008 In SA/168/2008 KANDYA KHALYA TADAVI AND ORS VERSUS JERMA BAPA TADAVI AND ORS Advocate(s) for Petitioner: Mr.S.B. Jadhav, Adv. h/f Mr. R L Kute, Adv. Adv. For R.Nos.1 to3: Mr.Rane Girish. AGP for R.No.4 : Mr. D.R. Kale. ... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. Dated: June 28, 2011 ... This contempt petition alleges disobedience of the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court on 3rd March, 2008 and 27th June, 2008 in Second Appeal No.168/2008. 2 In pursuance to the notices issued to the respondents, the respective respondents have filed affidavits-in-reply. In the affidavit filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, it is categorically stated that there is no breach of order of status FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ cp329.08 2 quo by respondents 1 to 3. The affidavit has been filed by respondent No.4 stating therein that an application was received from the petitioner and respondents and, accordingly, preventive action has been taken. Both the parties were asked to execute bond. Accordingly, the petitioner and respondents have executed bonds u/s 107 of Cr.P.C. 3 In the light of affidavit filed by Respondent No.4, in my opinion, nothing further remains to be decided in this contempt petition. Contempt Petition stands disposed of. Notices stand discharged. (S.S. SHINDE, J). PLK/