'y^ ^||^td<LI, ^Tll<rl/l<o, [®|<rtl<Hli< ^^o2...:...ST...i.^.<-. WWll <»»*ll<h r W^ 200 ^ ^n^T Tra^T (yii^^f) ^I^T 'SRt ^Jcb TOT3TT^STsR1RN? '^ ^<HW ^ftU 3TT^?T PETITIQNERS 1. Ashok B Sl-ii'i La|< Govt. Niddle (CG) chl^f^^l'1 'RTR^f "^f^S <F'|<^|< '^3fRfH3TI^T Cumar Sharma Aged 52 years, W/o diaii Lal Misl-u'a, Assistaiit Teacheiy School, Arjunda, District Durg Shri M 2. Hari Shjankar Meshram Aged 51 years, S/o y.-iavir Prasad Meshram, Assistant Dundera, 3. Teacherl Govt. Middle School, Block CIAoLiki, District Dm'g (CG) Siiit. Pi^shpa Tiwari Aged 51 years, S/o Shri Murle JPrasad Tiwati, Assistant Teacher, Middle $chool Mahatnia Gandhi No.-l, Durg District pm-g (CG) 4. Khilawajn. Chaiidrakai' Aged 50 years, S/o liarat Lal Chandrakar, Assistant Govt. Gu'ls Pruiiaiy School, Mother [Nagar Kainp-2 BhUai District Diirg Shri Bl Teacher] Terasa (CG) v\ Stafce Writ Peiition under Articlel S.B. Hoa9ble Shri Dhirendra 16-10-2008 Shri Somkant Veniia, ccj Smt. Smita Ghai, PL for| ersus RSSPONDENT8 1. The Secretant Ministry, 2. The Distijict Education officer, Dm-g (CG) of Chhattisgarh, through, the , School Education Department DKS Bhawan, Rafpur (CG) 226 ofthe Constitution oflndia Mishm, J. lunsel for the petitioner. the State. - ?II^7T ^T ^uil^, <M'IJ^IM —FS/197—3/2008 —40,000. /-^^- ^ t'!%,^ i '^ ^^^^. 3n^S?T ^T ^Jcb ^WT 3TT^T sft*li<=t» *<WCTI n»ii<si» -3"5E[ ^||q|<nq^ ^xll^^Ko, [®|<r11<H^< . ^A-^ 5^.7-6 -^200^ ^n^?T<<ra^ (<icii^^) ^<nw;RRrc[ STT^T ^ By this petition under India, the petitioners have cl. two additional increments 1 exainination, as per circular with l^w }wd down in t.he ma Vs. Municipal Corporation, MPJR-CG 96. Leamed counsel for th4 pressing this petition at this| petitioners may be permitte^ before conipetent authorit^ entitlement of tlie additiona]| directed to be decided by th^ in the light of law laid down| Bharadwaj (supra). On the other hand, objection if this petition r direction. In view of above subn petition is disposed of with. detailed representation befo: «ar»Hf<!1<fll*1M<??1 ^f k^ <R»1<^1< ^^tRpT^n^r Article 226* of the Constitution of umed that they are also entiUed for rom tiie date of passing of B.TJ. )ftiie State Govt. and m accordance ter of Yashwatit Kutnaf Bharadwaii Durg 8s Anr. reported in 2006(II| petitioners submits that he is not stage. However, he prays that the to make a detailed representation of the respondents regarding mcrements and the saliie niay be competent authority expeditiously, m the niatter of Yashwant Kumar le4med counsel for the State has no > disposed of with the aforesaid ^issions of the parties, the instant [iberty to the petitioners to niake a 'e tiie competent authority of the ^^t7T ^T g^TT^T, <M^i<411^ —FS/197—3/2008 —40,000. V^:,A f %-m. ^'-m 3TT^?[ 'SFt fq"1W ^WT^TT^TsCTW \— ^i ^, ~5^ ^WW^, ^Tll^^Ko, [®l<rll^^< A«^j.Z.cs^........^a.2».6..... ^IU^II d»*li<<»^^ ^-^- • ^•^""^ -^ 200 ^) STI^T XR^ (yit^q^) ^wi<tR « a^i^<i 3 respondents, raismg all thei|r On such representation bem^ the competent authority, kee^in matter of Yctshwant Kumw} subject to vertflcation of th^ have acquired B.T.I. certifica|:e Circulars dated 24.12.1998 they have been paid two adv( to costs. . chl^fd^l'l *ii*i<n1 ^F'fe^zt <Pt^i< ^T ^tRlH 3TI^T r grievances raised in this petition. ; made, the saiiie shall be decided by 3ing in view the law laid down m ttie Bharadwaj (supra), expeditiously, fact as to whether the petitioners at their own expenses, as per the and 1.3.1999 and farther whether ance uicrements or not. No order as Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ^[^^ ^N g^TT^T, <l-3l^i^!N —-FS/197—3/2008 —40,000.