IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4364 of 2010 1. JAIRAM SAH S/O INDRASAN SAH R/O VILL.- RAMPUR (TOLA PANDITPURA), P.S.- BHORE, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE JOINT SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GOPALGANJ, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 5. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, GOPALGANJ, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 6. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, GOPALGANJ, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BLOCK- BHORE, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 8. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, BLOCK- BHORE, P.S.- BHORE, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 9. THE MUKHIA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, RAKWA, BLOCK- BHORE, P.S.- BHORE, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 10. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ- RAKEBA, BLOCK- BHORE, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ ----------- 2 20.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Contention of the petitioner is that he may not be removed from the post merely because he had qualified the Intermediate Examination beyond the time frame of 33 months from the date of his appointment. Since the petitioner has obtained his Intermediate degree may be beyond the specified time but taking into consideration the circular of the State Government and the decision rendered by this Court, the respondents may not have an occasion to remove him from the post. Keeping in mind the decision which had been rendered in the case of Ashok Kumar Das & Others vrs. The State of Bihar & Others reported in 2010 (1) PLJR 665 as well as the circular of the State Government in this regard, let the respondents take appropriate remedial measure on the issue in case any adverse - 2 - decision has been taken against him on that count. This writ application is disposed of with the above observation. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)