iii *: ->. IN THE HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE AT BILASPUR fC.G.l WRTT PETHION N0. ^fZT/2006 PETmONER.. ^ ..•<t^'" ../ ^y^-' y ^.•••^'^/ '..-•v^" ^^z^ ^fe^ /^'^' ^>'^/" ^"•" ^ ^-M. K.Joshi, S/o. Late Shri Himmat Lal Joshi, aged about 56 years, Occupatipn - Govt. Servant, presentty working as Mining Inspector & Incharge Assistant Mining Officer, O/o. Collector, Raigarh [C.G.] VERSUS ^'1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Its Secretary, Department of Mines & Mineral Resources, Mantrafaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur [C.G]. /^2. Director, Directorate of Geology & Mining Chhattisgarh, Sonakhan Bhawan, Ring Road, No.l, Viliage Puraina, P.0. Ravigram, Raipur [C.G,] SSq Xf-HC-78 T^^Wv^f, »Tfl'H'is,Rciiuy XI-HC-78 sn^i^TR-fi* *ii*ini »»*iiq> 3S? •^l'illci*!, OT(1tf*l<o, (°l<tl<riy ^^ ^.|2.C^..^^5..|^ 200 65 3< 1^1 4s(<b (l°tl3°«<ll) BRrreTBfitTsn^T oetiti<(ner 12-S-2009 Shri Ashish Shrivasava,! Shri Satjsh Gupta, fespQ.nctents. Heard both the counssi. The case of the petiti<i inspecior vide order dated 3-< Vide order dated 21-2-81 the confirmed as and when was at S. No.6 i.n the gradati. l ne petitioner ",'as granted after compietion of 24 years of| service he was flranted first persons junior to the peti'tlon^ l^lning Officer Ignoring the c!air Learned counsel for D$tmoH9r c2Hi$ to know sboiit -14 CS 'fHHA /A*^*-s^Y'!fs^Q/^<\ +i t':t.^.^^i/~r4 ^/^j ti i^AUi^~f~y'U/, u P/10), th^f6affcSf SQgin on $| [counss! fcrthe petitioner. psput!/ Govt. Advocate for the State/ perm^nent SC& 10.2.2006 (Annexure-P/14), petitioner has been declded, decide the representation to no objection. Having heard isarned c< the fscts and circumstances ofl for th@ petitioner is just, fair an<|i directed to decide representatl' +l<lFcl<fl-f *<|t)dTffrs'<fl <Ritei< ^STf^HSD^T :i<jner is that he was appointed as iMining |-76 on probation for a period of 2 years. ftetitioner was communlcated that he wiii be i^nent post wiil be avaiisbie. The pefitjoner j-n list which was. isstjed in t-he year 19S2. .c^is promotiQn vide ords.r datsd 23-4-2002 |ser»ice. Earlier csn compteiion of 12 vears |scaie promotion. However, later on, the }r were promoted te the post of Assistant ofthepetltioner. fhe petitioner submitted that when the ths Hisgs'ity hs movsd rspres$nrst'on op ^rsaiter aflaiR on 15.11.2005 i'Annsxure- 112.2005 (Annexura-P/115 and agau-i on i^ut none of tne representations of the fherefore, respondent No.1 be dlrected to Vtlhich iearned counsai for respona'ents has rii ^unse! for ths parties and having regard to |the case, prayer made by iearned counse! ^ reasonabie, therefore, respondent No.1 is t|ion of the petitioner within a period of 3 XI-dC-78 Sf^V 'R R-li* (rar^i^i sbHi'* ^<v^-| 3'^^raicPT, »T(iM<ie,f°i<y)i^y Ht*ini sh*iit*» ^[200 67 3ii^»i4a<»(l?if3°«<<r) ?TaiWflfeT3(I^T |c!aim of the petitioner, in accordance with afore^id months after considering the iaw. With the direction afore^id, Consfiquentiy, M.(W.)F}- also stand djsposed of. Partles are entitied for c^rtified copy ofthis order. <bl'i|Icl'i|1-< tllHcfTffrs^ <Rl«K ^ari^irsTi^r id, the petition stands disposed of. No.-!91S/2Q06 and !.A. No.4ae6./2006 Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge