IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16845 of 2010 KEDAR MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 24.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail in connection with a case registered under Sections 302/201, 364, 307/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that the informant’s brother went out on 17.09.2004 and since then was traceless and when the informant came to the village on 23.09.2004, villagers Sudhir Singh and Dharmvir Singh conveyed that the brother of the informant was taken away by eight persons including the petitioner and on that basis the F.I.R. was lodged on 24.09.2004. From Annxrue-3 it appears that there is no injury. Moreover other accused persons have been granted bail vide Annexure-4 series. Statement has been made in paragraph 9 of the petition that the investigation was kept pending with regard to some others including the petitioner except Umesh Mahto against whom chargesheet was submitted. Petitioner is languishing in jail since 23.08.2009. The aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner has not been controverted by the 2 learned counsel for the State. However learned counsel for the State has submitted that now charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid submissions, for the purposes of bail only, let the petitioner namely Kedar Mahto, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, I, Barh in connection with Sessions Trial No. 589 of 2009 arising out of Bahadur P.S. Case No. 36 of 2004. The learned Sessions Judge will be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner, if the petitioner fails to appear on two consecutive dates. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)