IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27650 of 2011 1.Deo Narayan Mahto, Son of Late Rameshwar Mahto. 2.Arun Kumar, Son of Late Thaga Mahto. 3.Anirudha Kumar, Son of Late Thaga Mahto. 4.Devendra Kumar, Son of Late Thaga Mahto. 5.Harendra Kumar, Son of Late Thaga Mahto. 6.Amrendra Kumar, Son of Deo Narayan Mahto. 7.Saroj Kumar, Son of Deo Narayan Mahto. 8.Akheleshwar Kumar @ Akhilesh Kumar, Son of Narayan Mahto. 9.Raj Mangal Mahto, Son of Late Narayan Mahto. 10.Nandu Mahto, Son of Late Narayan Mahto. 11.Awadhesh Mahto, Son of Nageshwar Mahto. 12.Kapleshwar Mahto, Son of Bhola Mahto. 13.Pragas Mahto, Son of Dhanukhi Mahto. 14.Binod Mahto, Son of Jimdar Mahto. 15.Ram Baran Mahto, Son of Kailash Mahto. 16.Rambali Mahto, Son of Kailash Mahto. All Residents of Village Bhalushiya, P.S. Majorganj, District Sitamarhi. ---------- Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar -------- Opposite Party ---------------- 02/- 09.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. All the sixteen petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 323, 324, 379, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(x) of Prevention of Atrocities on SC/ST Act, are named accused in this case of simple assault, abuse, misbehavior and taking away some cash and kind from the prosecution side. Submission is that the case appears squarely covered under a decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in a case of “Jorgia Pentiah Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh reported in 2009 (1) BCCR 153 (SC)”. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned Court, Sitamarhi, in connection with Majorganj P.S. Case No. 73 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for one year or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)