a? £2, gggtg BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ( CHHATTISGARH ) ‘R\0°> /2011 W.P. (S) N0. PETITIONER : /'G.S. Borkar, S/o Shri N.T. Borkar, aged about 58 years, Occupation-Government Servant RESPONDENTS .‘. 1 . Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Director, Directorate Department of Public Instruction, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) K.C. Kabra, S/o not known aged about 46 years, Occupation— District Education Officer, Bemetara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) CONSTITUTION OF INDIA @ (D WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE Kabirdham, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through—Its Secretary Department of Public Instruction, D.K.S. .Bhawan HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETIT!ON (S) N021 09 OF 2011 G.S. Borkar Versus ESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others R PETITIONER (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Canstitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon’bie Shri Manindra Mohan Shriv‘a5tava,=J. Present :- Shri Raje$h Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Sridhar‘ Pane! Lawyer for the State. ' ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 215‘ day of April, 201 1) writ petition is dismissed. i l SA'I'ISH K. ANGNIHORI l Judge 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 15i04/2011 the (Annexure PH), whereunder, petitioner has been placed under suspension in contemplation of an enquiry on the ground that he was delinquent in performance of his duties. 3. The law in this respect is well settled that under provision of Rule 9 of the Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966, where a disciplinary proceedings against an employee is contemplated or is pending, he may be placed under suspensron. ‘4. Since the suspension order was passed on 15/04/2011 and the statutory requirement of 45/90 days to initiate departmental enquiry for the allegation made in the suspension order, has not come to an end, no interference is warranted at this stage. 5. Needless to mention here that in the impugned order, a copy has been endorsed to the Director, Public lnstruction, wherein it has been clearly stated that the charge sheet may be prepared within a period of 15 days. 6. ln view of foregoing, there is no merit in this case. Accordingly, the