IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11.6.2008 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.18085 of 2006 (T) (O.A.No.3374 of 1995) R.Ranganathan .. Petitioner vs. The District Collector Nagapattinam NQM District .. Respondent This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the respondent relating to the order in RC No.5598/91/A5, dated 31.5.1995. For petitioner : Mr.Muthumani Doraisami For Respondents : Mr.B.K.Girish Neelakantan Government Advocate O R D E R This writ petition has been filed challenging the show cause notice, dated 31.5.1995, issued by the respondent directing the petitioner to show cause as to why the disciplinary proceedings should not be proceeded against him under Rule 17(c)(i) of The Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Discipline and Appeal Rules). 2. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent has submitted that since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal had not granted any order of interim stay, the disciplinary proceedings had been initiated against the petitioner and final orders had been passed by the respondent in his proceedings in Roc.A5/5598/91, dated 13.12.1995 and the petitioner has been summarily dismissed from service. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has not refuted the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate appearing for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the respondent. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar lan To: The District Collector Nagapattinam NQM District +1cc to M/s. Muthumani Doraisami, Advocate Sr 28514 RS (CO) km/19.6. W.P.No.18085 of 2006 (T) (O.A.No.3374 of 1995) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/