IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-14612 of 2010 Date of decision: 18.10.2011 Anil Kumar and others ....Petitioners Versus Shyam Sunder and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Atul Lakhanpal, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. R.S. Chahal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ajay Kaushik, Advocate, for Mr. Pankaj Maini, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Mr. Atul Lakhanpal, learned senior Advocate, on the instructions of Mr. R.S. Chahal, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file revision before the Sessions Judge against the summoning order. He, however, apprehends that if revision is filed it would be dismissed on the ground of limitation. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file revision before the Sessions Judge. If revision is filed within 30 days from today it shall not be dismissed on the ground of limitation and shall be decided at its own merit in accordance with law. (Alok Singh) Judge October 18, 2011 R.S.