IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.668 of 2011 1. BADAL GUPTA, SON OF GANGA PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MADHWAPUR, P.S. MADHWAPUR. 2. SUNIL PASWAN, SON OF RAM CHANDRA PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JAGATPUR, P.S. RAHIKA. 3. PANKAJ JHA, SON OF DAYA NAND JHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARAYA TOLE, P.S. RAHIKA. 4. MUKESH SAFI, SON OF GANESH SAFI, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA BARA BAZAR GADIYANI, P.S. MADHUBANI. 5. ANIL SINGH, SON OF LAL BAHADUR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHANUKHI, P.S. RAHIKA. 6. BRAHMDEO YADAV, SON OF RAJENDRA YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BISHUNPUR, P.S. ARER. 7. SANJAY PASWAN, SON OF HRDAY PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KESHULI, P.S. BENIPATTI. 8. RAUSHAN KUMAR SINGH, SON OF DILIP SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KEWALPATTI, P.S. RAJNAGAR. ALL RESIDENT OF DISTRICT MADHUBANI. -------petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. -------------opposite party ----------- 2 03.02.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Madhubani Town P.S. Case no. 201/2010 registered under Sections.147, 148, 149, 452, 323, 307 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 10 of the Examination Act. The accusation against several persons to have entered the examination hall and torn the answer books of the examinees. The petitioners are named in the F.I.R. It is submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners that nothing specific has come during the investigation and the petitioners are also students of J.N. College, Madhubani. It is further submitted that the answer books were not recovered from possession of the petitioners. It is further contended on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners that maliciously the name of the petitioners have been given in the formal part of the F.I.R. Since the petitioners are named in that F.I.R. I am not inclined to interfere. However, on the basis of accusation and considering the fact that the petitioners are the student, it is a good case for regular bail. Let the petitioners surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the day of receipt/production of the copy of this order and pray for regular bail. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioners in the light of the observation made above and try to dispose of the same preferably on the same day. With the above observation, this application is disposed of. Amrendra /- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)