dgm gm gm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.6322 OF 2007 PETITION NO.6322 OF 2007 PETITION NO.6322 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.R.S. Shekhawat i/b.Smt.P.U.Badadare for the Petitioners. Mr.D.A.Nalawade i/b.Mr.U.P.Warunjikar for the respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 21st October, 2008. : 21st October, 2008. : 21st October, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. In a pending suit, as both the courts refused to grant any interim protection/relief to the petitioner, therefore, the present writ petition. The suit is for injunction and removal of construction. At the prima facie stage considering the material, the trial court refused to grant any protection as prayed. The Appellate Court also, after perusal of the orders and material placed on record, further confirmed that the plaintiff failed to ( 2 ) prove prima facie case for granting urgent relief as it was based upon writing executed in the year 1990 including licence of April 2005. With the above reasoning, I see there is no reason to interfere with the impugned order. The petition is dismissed accordingly. [ ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]