IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER MONDAY, THE 28TH JULY 2008 / 6TH SRAVANA 1930 C.C.C.No. 153 of 2002(S) ----------------------------------------- ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER DATED 18/06/2001 IN CMP NO.7632/2001 IN OP NO.4592/2001 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN OP ---------------------------------------------- K.M.GAFOOR, S/O.MOHAMMED, AGED 35 YEARS, RESIDING AT 2/704, KUNNUMMEL HOUSE, FORTKOCHI P.O., KOCHI-1. BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 & RESPONDENTS 2 & 3 IN OP ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. K.ALOSHIOUS MATHEW (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN) SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF KOCHI. 2. JOLLY VARGHESE (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN) ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, FORTKOCHI, KOCHI-1. 3. T.M.FRANCIS (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN) REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORTKOCHI, KOCH.I 4. M.M.A.S.RAVUTHER, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN) TAHSILDAR, KOCHI TALUK OFICE, KOCHI-1. 5. CATHERIN PAUL, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN) VILLAGE OFFICER, FORTKOCHI. BY ADV. SMT.A.G.ANEETHA FOR R1 & R2 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.P.SREEKRISHNAN FOR R1 TO R5 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & A.K.BASHEER, J. ------------------------------------------------------- C.C.C. No.153 of 2002-S ---------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 28th day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. Complaining that the respondents have disobeyed the interim orders passed by this Court in O.P.No.4592 of 2001 dated 18-6-2001, the petitioner in the original petition has presented this contempt petition. 2. We are informed by Sri.M.P.Sreekrishnan, learned Government Advocate appearing for some of the respondents in the contempt petition that during the pendency of this contempt case, the respondents have put back the petitioner in possession of bunk shop. 3. In view of the subsequent development that has taken place during the pendency of this contempt case before this Court, in our view, at this stage, it may not be necessary for this Court to initiate any contempt proceedings against the respondents. 4. Accordingly, we close this contempt proceedings without considering the merits or demerits of the case of the petitioner. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (A.K.BASHEER) JUDGE MS