IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3420 OF 2010 Harinarayan G. Bajaj. ... Applicant. V/s. State of Maharashtra and Anr. ... Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3967 OF 2010 Vijay Agarwal & Anr. ... Applicants. V/s. State of Maharashtra and Anr. ... Respondents. Zal Andhyarujina i/b. Vivek M. Sharma for the applicants. A.S.Shitole, APP for the respondent-State. Parvez Upharey for respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM : V.M.Kanade, J. DATED : 23rd November 2010. P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Both, the original complainant as well as the accused are aggrieved by the order passed by the Sessions Judge dated 16th June, 2010 in Crim.Revision Application Nos.481/2010 and 590/2010. Since both the parties are aggrieved by the impugned order, in my view, it would be proper that the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the Sessions Court for a fresh hearing of both the criminal revision applications on merits and disposal in accordance with law. Hence the impugned order is set aside. Both the criminal revision applications are remanded to the Sessions Court. The Sessions Court is directed to hear and decide both the criminal revision applications afresh. All the contentions raised by both parties in these applications are kept open. Sessions Court to decide the revision applications within a period of three months. 3. Both the criminal applications are disposed of. (V.M.Kanade, J.)