1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Writ Petition No.1871 of 2008 Master Siddharth Arjun Thombre & anr. Petitioners Mr.A.B.Vagyani for petitioners. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. March 31, 2008 P.C. . Heard Mr.Vagyani, the learned counsel for the petitioners - minors. Through their mother Civil Misc. Application Nos.58 and 59 of 2007 were filed before the District Court seeking permission for sale of 1.5 H. land from Gat No.189, in each case, under Section 8 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. By the impugned common order dated 16/1/2008 both the applications have been rejected. . The learned Ad-hoc District Judge noted that the income to the family was from the cultivation of the suit land, the minors were not studying in schools where the mother was required to spend high amounts and there was no prima facie evidence to show that it was in the interest of the minors that the land was sought to be sold. This view taken by the 2 lower Court is a possible view and it cannot be termed as perverse or manifestly erroneous so as to call for interference under Article 227 of the Constitution. . Mr.Vagyani referred to an agreement for sale dated 6/2/2008 and submitted that an alternative land is sought to be purchased by disposing off the suit land. This document was not before the Court below and, therefore, the petitioners are not estopped from approaching the District Court afresh under Section 8 of the Guardians and Wards Act. . Hence the petition is rejected with liberty to the petitioners as is available in law. (B.H.MARL