IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4547 of 2010 Santosh Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ----------- 02. 05.07.2011 Mr. Udit Narain Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Satish Kumar Sinha, assisting counsel to SC 1 for the respondent. The writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 4.1.2002 as contained in Annexure-8, whereby the High Court on its administrative side has issued directions to the District and Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in relation to settlement of shops within the premises of Civil Court, Aurangabad for restricting the number of shops vending plain sheets etc. within the campus of Civil Court at Aurangabad to not more than nine and that of stamp vendor to not more than three. Following the order passed by the High Court the District Judge vide order as contained in Annexure-9, allotted shops to 9 persons for vending of stamp papers etc. within the campus of Civil Court at Aurangabad. As the petitioner whose name appears at serial no. 18 of the panel placed at Annexure-9, was not offered any shop, hence he challenged the order of the District Judge, Aurangabad by filing a writ petition giving rise to C.W.J.C. 14340 of 2003. The writ petition was disposed of by a Bench of this Court vide order passed on 9.1.2009 (Annexure-5) and while refusing to exercise discretion in the 2 matter, the petitioner was afforded liberty to persuade the concerned authority of the Civil Court at Aurangabad in case there is any change in circumstances and/or there is any change in the number of shops. Learned counsel for the petitioner while relying upon a representation placed at Annexure-6 of the writ petition submits that the petitioner in the light of the liberty did approach the District and Sessions Judge, Aurangabad vide representation dated 24.2.2009 but the same has remained pending. It is indisputed that the father of the petitioner was a licensed vendor for vending of stamp papers and other papers relating to court work and therefore was allotted a shop within the premises of Civil Court, Aurangabad and after his death the petitioner was granted a fresh licence on 6.10.1997 on a compassionate basis. The petitioner continued to operate the shop until the order of the District Judge dated 21.3.2002 placed at Annexure-9. As the number of the licence holders was reduced to 9 and then enhanced to 10, the case of the petitioner did not find favour and he was not allotted any shop. The issue has already been deliberated upon by a Bench of this Court and disposed of vide order placed at Annexure-5 and this Court sitting in a coordinate jurisdiction would not review or sit in appeal over the order. The application is thus disposed of in terms of the directions of 3 this Court passed in C.W.J.C. No. 14340 of 2003 (Annexure-5), which permits the petitioner to approach the authority of Civil Court, Aurangabad, in case there is any change in circumstances and/or change in the number of the shops. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)