THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26331 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner was selected as a Constable by the A.P. State Level Police Recruitment for A.P. Special Police. Alleging that the petitioner resorted to malpractice in the course of training, he was discharged. The petitioner approached the A.P. Administrative Tribunal by filing O.A.No.1984 of 2011. The O.A. was disposed of by the Tribunal directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner keeping in view the manner in which another candidate similarly situated was dealt with. Through order, dated 15.07.2011, respondent No.1 rejected the case of the petitioner. The same is challenged in this writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home. The learned counsel for the petitioner has, no doubt, addressed arguments, touching on various questions of fact and law involved in the matter. He has drawn parity with another candidate, who faced similar allegations, but was exonerated from the lapse by invoking a G.O. How-so-ever attractive and convincing the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner may be, this Court feels handicap on account of the bar of jurisdiction imposed under Section 15 of the A.P. Administrative Tribunals Act. The petitioner can repeat all these contentions before the Tribunal and in case, no satisfactory relief is granted there, he can very well approach this Court by filing a writ petition. There is no reason to believe that the Tribunal would not appreciate these contentions and take the gravity of the situation into account. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to seek the relief before the A.P. Administrative Tribunal. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:21.09.2011. Note: Issue cc tomorrow. (B/o) kdl