CRLR No.20/09 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Sri Ajay Veer Pundir, Adv. for the revisionist. Mr. KS Verma, Adv. for the respondents. For the reasons stated delay condonation application no.120/09 is allowed. Delay in filing the revision is condoned. Learned counsel for the revisionist fairly submitted that this revision has been preferred against an ex parte order and against the said order, remedy is available to him as per Section 126(2) Cr.P.C. Hence he submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw this revision with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum. Revision is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (D.V., J.) 08.10.2010 Rajeev Dang