IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 29124 of 1995 Between: 1. Perumandla Ramaswamy, S/o. Mallaiah, 2. Perumandla Pedda Venkata Somulu, S/o. Papaiah, 3. Pidgu Biksham S/o.Nuthi Lingaiah, 4. Mohmed Yakub Ali, S/o. Abbasali, 5. Jillella Soma Venkadu, S/o. Methaiah, 6. Pidgu Venkataiah, S/o. Eddappaiah, 7. Pidgu Venkata Somulu, S/o. Gopaiah, 8. Nidigonda Paramesh, S/o. Malsomu, 9. Nidigonda Venkanna, S/o. Ramachandraiah, 10. Nidigonda Papaiah, S/o. Veeraiah, 11. Nidigonda Ramadas, S/o. Malsounu, 12. Shaik Sadhak, S/o. Shaik Hussain, 13. Mohmed Bashu-Miya, S/o.Mahabubali, 14. Kondapalli Narsing Rao, S/o. K.Gopal Rao, 15. Boddupalli Bakkaiah, S/o. Latchaiah, Petitioners 1 to 14 are residents of Brahmana Kothapalli and Petitioner No.15 is resident of Boddlada village, hamlet of Brahmana Kothapalli, Nellikuduru Mandal, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1. The District Collector, Warangal District. Warangal. 2. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Nellikuduru (V), Nellikudur (M), Warangal District. 3. The Mandal Revenue Inspector, Nellikuduru (V) and Mandal, Warangal District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned action of the respondents herein in not sanctioning of Taibandi (area selected for second crop) for the cultivation of the lands of the petitioners in Brahmana Kothapalli (v) and Boddlada h/o Brahmana Kothapalli, Nellikuduru (M), Warangal District, as illegal, void ab-initio, and the respondents may be further directed to release the water to the petitioners' lands for cultivation of petitioners’ wet land situated at Brahmana Kothapalli (v), and Boddalada h/o. Brahmana Kothapalli of Nellikuduru (M), Warangal District, under Rule 11 of "RULES”. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.K.R.RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 29124 of 1995 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. ________________ N.V.RAMANA, J. Date: 1st September, 2004. CS/SVV ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1.The District Collector, Warangal District, Warangal. 2.The Mandal Revenue Officer, Nellikuduru Mandal, Warangal District. 3. The Mandal Revenue Inspector, Nellikuduru village and Mandal, Warangal District. 4.Two C.Cs. to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (O.U.T.) 5.Two C.D.copies.