(^j- f'ZTO IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (s) N0.' OF 2007 PETITIONER ,<\-v<r j ^ ^^ -^..^'^- ^y ^^ '^ uif(\.f ^ RESPONDENTS Vs Narendra Kumar Singh, son of Shri Ramadhar Singh, aged about 58 years, Working as Clerk, South Himmer Colliery, Hasdeo Area, resident of South Jhagharkhand Colliery, C.R.O. Camp Badidafai, Post South Jhagrakhand, Distt. Koriya (Chhattisgarh). 1. South Eastern Coalfields Limited, through the Chairman cum Managing Seepat Road, Director, ^-—Bilaspur. 2. The Manager, Superintendent/ South Jhimmer Colliery, Post Office Jhimmer Colliery, District Annuppur (M.P.) P ETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/J2ST"OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA KSSS-: gt: Ssi ®^;' iaa aa Bifei's •II VKf' Si:?: 111 P! 1tll;SEIi .iillBiF IIIE ^i :^'ll^ i 118&» Sfil M.il iB!:: ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT^BLLASPUR (Hon. WIr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) Writ Petition (S) No. 3953 of 2007 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Narendra Kumar Singh VERSUS South Eastern Coal Fields Ltd.. another Miss; Sharmila Singhai, counsel for the petitioner. Shri R. R. Sinha, counsel for the respondents. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE • Sis CQNSTITUTiPnOF INDIA 0_R_DEJZ '^'jl (28.09.2010) || Grievance of the petitioner in this petition is that as his correctl date of birth is 20.10.1949 whereas as per form B of SECL it is, 10.04.1997. Thus, what remains in dispute here is the date of birth Qf| the petitioner. Counsel appearing for both the parties very fairlyi submit that this petition may be disposed of by referring the matter t6| the Age Determination Committee constituted by the respondents as| perNational Coal Wage Agreement. Additionally, petitioner's counsel| makes a prayer for issuing direction to the said Committee to considen| the entire documentary evidence available on record including m3i|k| sheets and certificates in possession ofthe petitioner. To this, couns'el!| for the respondents lent an assurance that the Age Determination| Committee would consider all aspects of the matter and that the| petitioner would also be at liberty to submit all the relevant documents.. | 2. Inview of above, the petition is disposed of with a direction fo| the respondents - SECL to refer the dispute with regard to date of birthl of the petitioner to the Age Determination Committee within a period Qfl fourweeks from today and the said committee, in turn, shall considep] and decide the same on its own merits, in accordance with law wittnFt] a further period of four months after giving due opportunity to the| petitioner. Sd7- Pritinker Diwakar Judge aricl 11111