IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12034 of 2011 BINOD KUMAR RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the member of the Panchayat Samiti is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 353, 326, 504 and 163 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that when the informant being the Block Development Officer refused to give no objection certificate for construction of road then the petitioner misbehaved and threatened to kill and demanded Rs. 5,000/- per month as extortion from the informant. It appears that for making available a land for construction of Community Hall, the petitioner requested the informant. The report of Karamchari was in favour of making available the land in question which was being maliciously delayed by the informant. It is further submitted that other employees have also complained against the informant 2 before the learned Collector and the learned Collector has also taken action the informant. Considering the background in which the present case has been lodged clouds bonafide of accusation against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Buxar(M) P.S. Case No. 49 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Buxar, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)