bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 141 OF 2009 M/s.Amol Paper Mills Pvt.Ltd. ..Appellant Vs. Union of India ..Respondent Mr.D.H.Nankani a/w. V.N.Ansurkar i/b. Legal Solutions for appellant. Mr.R.V.Desai, Senior Advocate a/w. R.B.Pardeshi for respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & K.K.TATED,JJ. DATE : 6TH JANUARY,2010 P.C. 1. Heard. Perused appeal. 2. From the impugned order, it is clear that the matter is remanded back for consideration afresh. Under these circumstances, we do not propose to go into the merits of the issue raised. However, if the decision of the Tribunal goes against the appellant, it would be open for the appellant to challenge the same. All contentions on merits are kept open. In this view of the matter, the appeal stands disposed of for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs. (K.K.TATED,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)