C^v 9^~6 •ifi'i c asut- 5 INTHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.(SlNo........................2011 -7?"'/« v^ PETITIONER / ^ ...•'^v..-'" Y..'''"^.-7'" .-•• ^;€^-<' >~.<^<~..-^^ ^.^^^v >>"t^ ..--^ c^,---"y^t Versus RESPONDENTS ^ (1) (2) -(3) /f4) Rajendra Singh, aged 67 years, S/oShri Ram Bharose Singh, Retd. Accountant, Block Office (C.E.O.) Koylibeda, Tahsil - Pakhanjur, Distt. Kanker(Chhattisgarh) The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Revenue Deptt, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) Collector, Kanker (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kanker (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad a Panchayat Koyalibeda, Tahsil-Pakhanju, Distt.Kanker (C.G.) Writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of mandamus of writ/direction or anv other aDDropriate writ. Petitioner respectfully prays as under:- 1. Partjcylars^f petitipner: - As stated above. 2. Particulars of respondents:- As stated above. 3. Order aaainst which writ petitionjs being filed: ^ HIQH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER WRST PETITION (S) N0.753 OF 2Q11 Rajendra Singh Versus The Stste Govt. of Chhattisgarh & (Writ Petitson under ArtisSe 226/227 ofthe Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon'bis Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for ths petitioner. Shri N.N- Roy, Pane! La'i^erfor the State. 3. ORDER (ORAL') ;, thic 10-'' day of February, 2011} ipas,.>^u •-: Leamed counsel aoDeanna tor tne Detitioner submiss mat petitioner was retired from servsce on 31/0772003 on attaining the age of superannuation, in respecf of payment of traveiing aslcwance to fhe tun®of Rs.50.000- and Rs. 2S50/- of traveiinci Suvidha, is pending cons'cieration befbre the authorffles. Since then correspondence betwsen the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Koylibeda and Chief Executive Ofncer, Jiia Panchayat Uttar Bastar Kanker is aolna on slnce 27/10/2005. but till dats no finsi decision has been taken. Learned counsei further submits that the Chief Executiv's Officer, .(ili Psnchavat, Uttar Bastar, Kanker has written a ietter ciated 23/07/2009 (Annexure P/7) to the Collector, Uttar Bastef, Kanter, but fhe same has not vieided any resuit. Shri Roy, learned Pane! Lawy'er appearing for the State^respondent No.1 & 2 submits that tHe State may be gfanted some time to seeks instructions. in the case on hand, it is not necessarv to Qi'ant time to the State to seek instructions, as ths aispuie is stil! pending sonsiderstion before the CoiSector, Uttar Bastar.Kanker. !t is, thsre'ore, just and Drooer to direct ths Coiiector, Uttar Bastar Kanker. to look into the matter and ensurs that the oayment, >f adrnissibie !eaa1i» is paid at the eafiiest Dreferablv within a Deriod of six weeks from today. Accordinsiv, the writ aetstiop is disposed of. S^sb^Se