IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 366 of 1990 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER Versus JITENDRA RAMESHANKAR MEHTA SINCE DECD. -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR VB PATEL for Petitioner No. 1 MR YN RAVANI for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI Date of decision: 31/08/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. The respondent workman in the present petition has expired on 26.8.1991. Thereafter on 5.12.1992 the legal heirs of the deceased workman had filed Civil Application No.2214/92 for bringing the legal heirs on record of the main petition. The said application came to be rejected by this Court on 25th November 1992. Thereafter the present petitioner filed Civil Application No.6947/04, which also came to be rejected. 2. Since the respondent workman has expired the petition does not survive qua prayer for resinstatement. Accordingly the petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged. However, it is clarified that all other legal dues, if any, shall be paid to the legal heirs of the workman. [K.S. JHAVERI, J.] *ar*