IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 18TH AUGUST 2008 / 27TH SRAVANA 1930 RP.No. 844 of 2008(T) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.11297/2008 Dated 10/04/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT ----------------------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY ERNAKULAM BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: ------------------------------- M.M.SEENATH, D/O. M.E.MAJEED,THEKKEMALIYAM VEEDU EDAPPALLY. BY SRI.VARGHESE PREM THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== R.P.NO.844 OF 2008 IN W.P.(C) NO. 11297 OF 2008 T ==================== Dated this the 18th day of August, 2008 O R D E R The point now raised in this review petition is that Ext.P4 grant in implementation of Ext.P3 was made overlooking the fact that counter signature of RTA, Alleppey is necessary. 2. If as a matter of fact, such a counter signature is a statutory requirement, it is clarified that this judgment will not stand in the way of the authorities obtaining the same and complying with the judgment thereafter. The review petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp