THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 2376 of 2011 Dated: 15-07-2011 Oral Order: This revision under Article 227 of the Constitution is directed against the order dated 22-2-2011 of the I Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, rejecting I.A.No. 728 of 2010 in O.S.No. 1395 of 2004 filed by the revision petitioners/defendants for marking of the relinquishment deed dated 20-9-1980 as an evidence for “the collateral purpose” to prove the factum of adoption. This document was earlier sought to be marked and that application was rejected by an order of the trial court dated 21-9-2007 on the ground that the deed being a relinquishment deed and unregistered could not be marked in evidence. The revision petitioner carried the order dated 21-9-2007 in revision before this Court in C.R.P.No. 5121 of 2007. This was dismissed by the order dated 13-2-2009 observing that the document is clearly titled as “Hakuvidula Patram”; there is no mention of “Adoption” or “Adopted” anywhere in the document and therefore, the document is clearly one for relinquishment of the right on the property and therefore was compulsorily registerable and not having been registered was inadmissible in evidence. Undaunted, the revision petitioner filed I.A.No. 728 of 2010 for marking of the same document for what he pleaded was, the collateral purpose of proving adoption. Having regard to the earlier order by the same Court dated 21-9-2007 as affirmed in CRP No. 5121 of 2007 wherein the instrument dated 21-9-1989 was found not to be an instrument evidencing adoption but pure and simple one of relinquishment of right to property, the court below rejected I.A.No. 728 of 2010. This Court discerns no error in the order of the Court below warranting interference under Article 227 of the Constitution. The revision is dismissed at the stage of admission. ________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 15th July, 2011. GRR