1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. C.A. No. 1802 of 2010 In Rej. FA No. 475 of 2009 Harishchandra v. Ramdas and ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr M.A. Sable, Adv for applicant Mr Patil, Adv for respdts no. 1 to 3 Mr S.M. Uike, Adv for respdt no.4 Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 4.8.2010 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Filing of First Appeal was delayed by 884 days. This Court after taking into consideration rival contentions refused to condone the delay vide order dated 30th September 2009. That order was maintained by the Apex Court also. 2. While presenting appeal, applicant/appellant had made mandatory deposit of Rs. 25,000/- and since the appeal has met with consequential dismissal on account of rejection of the application for condonation of delay, the present application is filed for refund of Rs. 25,000/-. 3. Application is opposed on behalf of respondents. It is contended that the Tribunal has awarded compensation of Rs. 2 lacs along with interest and liability of Rs. 1 lakh is fastened on the present applicant, but the applicant has not paid anything out of the amount of liability. 2 4. In view of the above, application is rejected. The Registry is directed to transmit amount of Rs. 25,000/- together with interest accrued thereon to the MACT, Wardha. The Tribunal, on receipt of the amount, shall consider disbursal thereof to the claimants on their application. Application stands disposed of accordingly. Judge. joshi