IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.1773 of 2006 (M/S) Sher Singh ………..Petitioner Versus Dhan Singh & another …….Respondents Shri Anil Dabral, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Pankaj Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the respondents. Dated: 04th June, 2010 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. CLMA. No.4061of 2010 (Misc. Appl.) Heard learned counsel for the parties. Present application has been filed jointly by the petitioner as well as respondents for deciding the writ petition in terms of compromise arrived at in between the parties. Both the parties have filed separate affidavits, in which it is mentioned that parties have settled the matter outside the Court and the petitioner has paid the decreetal amount to the respondents as per the terms of compromise and in view of the compromise, the writ petition may be disposed of and the judgment and order dated 29.07.2006 and decree dated 17.08.2006 passed by District Judge Chamoli in Civil Appeal no.9 of 2005, ‘Dhan Singh & another Vs. Sher Singh and another’ be set-aside. 2 In view of the aforesaid compromise, the writ petition is allowed. The judgment and order dated 29.07.2006 and decree dated 17.08.2006 passed by District Judge Chamoli in civil appeal no.9 of 2005, ‘Dhan Singh & another Vs. Sher Singh and another’ is set aside. Application stands disposed of. (V.K. Bist, J.) Arpan 04.06.2010