IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11742 of 2011 Rahul Poddar @ Tutu Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 04/ 06.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. There is omnibus allegation of rape against the petitioner but submission on his behalf is that in medical examination no sign of rape was found on the person of the informant. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that, as a matter of fact, an altercation had taken place between the petitioner and the informant’s husband prior to the institution of the present case and on account of the aforesaid altercation husband of the informant set up informant and got instituted this false case. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I do not feel it proper to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Katihar (Manihari) Rail P.S. Case no.68/2010 pending in the court of the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Katihar stands rejected, at least, at this stage. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)