IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8010 of 2011 The Faridabad Sainik Vihar Vs. State of Haryana & others Present: Mr.Vishal Sharma, Advocate, for Mr.Jagmohan Ghuman, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner's primary grievance is that they are ready to pay external development charges whatever leviable in respect to the society, which they had formed. The respondents are, however, insisting on paying development charges on the basis of society originally formed. The petitioner-society would contend that the present Sainik Vihar is separate and cannot be clubbed with original Sainik Colony, which has now a different identity, for the purpose of charging the external development charges. If that be so, the petitioner-society may represent against this before the respondents, which should be considered in the light of averments so made. If it is permissible to have two separate colonies in the manner as has been done in the case of petitioner, the same may be considered and appropriate order passed on the representation to be filed by the petitioner. No case for interference, at this stage, is made out. Dismissed. May 10, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE