1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Friday, the Thirtieth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD)No.12290 of 2011 1 K.P.V.PERIAMPILLAI 2 P.V.KANDASAMY 3 K.MURUGESAN 4 K.SELVAM 5 BASKARAN 6 DHANABALAN AMBALAKARAR 7 PANDISELVAM AMBALAKARAR :PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 TO 7 -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KEELAVALAVOO POLICE STATION, MELUR, MADURAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.144 OF 2011 :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT KURINJIKUMARAN :INTERVENOR (MP(MD)NO.1/2011) For Petitioners: MR.R.ANAND for M/S. A.KARTHIK Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate (Crl.side) For Intervenor : MR.K.VELLAISWAMY, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. ORDER:The Court Made the following order:- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 511 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.144 of 2011,on the file of the respondent police. They have approached this court for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2.Heard Mr.R.Anand for Mr.A.Karthik, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.K.V.Rajarajan, learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State and Mr.K.Vellaiswamy, learned counsel appearing for the intervenor. 3.It is seen from the allegations made that A-1 to A-7 brought men with weapons with the purpose of causing bodily injury to the de-facto complainant and with a view to prevent him to take charge as Ambalakarar. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.The learned counsel for the intervening petitioner submitted that in as much as the Ambalakarar has already been nominated, the persons of the petitioner would cause more serious law and order problem. Hence, he prayed to dismiss the anticipatory bail application. 5.Admittedly, there is no injury, to the defacto complainant. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and also considering the nature of allegation, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to all the petitioners, of course, subject to certain stringent conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the Judicial Magistrate concerned on executing separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, and on further condition that the petitioners shall stay at Trichy and appear before the Town Police Station, Trichy at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and they should not enter into the Vellaluar Nadu. During the said period, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 30/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Melur, Madurai District. 2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Inspector of Police, Keelavalavoo Police Station, Melur, Madurai District. 5.The Officer In-charge, Town Police Station, Trichy. +1CC to MR. A.KARTHIK Advocate SR.No.34502. +1CC TO M4.K.VELLAISAMY, ADVOCATE. SR.NO.34503. RP/30.09.2011/2P/8C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12290/11 Date :30/09/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/