IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 11721 of 1994 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT S DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- S R PATEL Versus BANASKANTHA MEHSANA GRAMIN BANK -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 11721 of 1994 MR MEHUL SHARAD SHAH for Petitioner No. 1 MR AJ SHASTRI for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT S DAVE Date of decision: 21/10/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Mr. Mehul Sharad Shah, learned advocate for the petitioner, on instructions, makes a statement at the Bar that the petitioner would like to pursue the remedy of representation to the respondent-Bank. The learned advocate Mr. A.J. Shastri, states that he has no objection if the petitioner makes a representation ventilating his grievances before the Chairman of the respondent-Bank. 2. It is open to the petitioner to make a representation ventilating his grievances before the Chairman of the respondent-Bank. It is hoped that the respondent-Bank shall decide the said representation in accordance with law within a reasonable time. 3. With the aforesaid observation, this petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. (Anant S. Dave, J.) (swamy)