-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.409 OF 2006 REVISION APPLICATION NO.409 OF 2006 REVISION APPLICATION NO.409 OF 2006 Popat Pralhad Nanaware ...Applicant vs. Arvind Dattatray Londhe & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.S.D.Patil a/w Mr.Ujwal Agandsurve for the Applicant. Mr.Rajesh More, A.P.P. for Respondent-State Ms A.B.Kasbe h/f Mr.V.V.Purwant for respondent Nos.1 & 2 Mr.I.M.Khairdi for Respondent No.3. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 24,2008. : JUNE 24,2008. : JUNE 24,2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Advocate for the applicant-original complainant, learned Advocates for the Respondents-original accused 1, 2 and 3 and the learned A.P.P. for Respondent State. 2. For the reasons stated in the Criminal Application No.529 of 2007, there is no merit in this Revision Application. Hence, Revision Application is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)