BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Sixteenth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12194 of 2011 V.PASUMPON ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SANKARANKOVIL TOWN POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DIST IN CR.NO. 569/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.SARAVANAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as an accused and he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 04.09.2011 for the alleged offence punishable under Section 307 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(x) of SC/ST ACt, in Crime No.569 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in respect of the parking of a cycle in front of the TASMAC shop, a wordy quarrel arose, which leads to assault. He further submitted that in the occurrence, both of them sustained injuries and therefore, the petitioner has given a complaint against the defacto complainant, and the same case has been registered in Crime No.570 of 2011. As a counter blast, the present complaint has been registered against the petitioner in Crime No.569 of 2011. He further submitted that in both the cases, the accused were arrested and the injured have already been discharged from the hospital and hence, he prays for enlargement on bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that this is a case and case in counter and because of the parking of the cycle, the dispute arose and both of them sustained injuries and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that because of the dispute arose for parking of cycle in front of the TASMAC shop, the occurrence has been taken place on 04.09.2011 and both of them sustained injuries and as per the version of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the injured have already been discharged from the hospital and also considering the nature of the offence, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. sd/- 16/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SANKARANKOVIL. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUNELVELI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, TIRUNELVELI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SANKARANKOVIL TOWN POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. M.SARAVANAN Advocate SR.No.31881 SR : 16.09.2011 : 2p/7c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12194 of 2011 Date :16/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/