IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND TEN WRIT PETITION No.4945 of 2010 Between: M/s.Sree Sai Johny Wines, reptd., by its Proprietor-Sri D.Sudhakar Reddy and others. … Petitioners And: The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Nampally, Hyderabad and others. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Palle Nageswar Rao. Counsel for the Respondent: Assistant Government Pleader for Prohibition & Excise for R.1 to R.3. None for R.4. This Court made the following: ORDER:- In this Writ Petition, the grievance of the petitioners is that the Depot to which they have been attached for lifting of liquor is 40 Kms., away from their places of business. The petitioners claimed to have made a representation on 21-1-2010 to respondent No.2 to attach Depot No.1 at Uppal of Ranga Reddy District to them. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise, on instructions, submitted that the petitioners’ purported representation was not received by respondent No.2. The petitioners have not filed any evidence to show that respondent No.2 has received their representation. In view of the same, the petitioners are permitted to make a fresh representation. On such a representation being made, respondent No.2 is directed to consider the same by keeping in view the distance between the two Depots. Unless respondent No.2 finds tenable objections against the petitioners’ request, he may positively consider their request for shifting of the Depot within one week from the date of receipt of fresh representation from the petitioners. Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:01-04-2010 MNR