1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Arbitration Petition No.40 of 2005 M/s.S.P.Enterprises Petitioner Vs. Union of India & ors. Respondents Mr.U.S.Samudrala for petitioner. Mr.K.B.Rao with Mr.Prajapati for respondents. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE ,J. March 31, 2006. P.C. . Heard. Persued the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the respondents today. . In the order dated 17/3/2006 it was noted that as against the nine claims raised by the applicant-Firm, the respondents had referred only six claims for arbitration and this application was for direction to add the remaining three claims. . In the affidavit-in-reply the respondents claim that the applicant participated in the proceedings held on 19/8/2005 as well as on 20/1/2006 but did not raise any such claim as is made in the present application for the remaining three claims to be referred for arbitration. The respondents do not state that the remaining three claims are excepted claims. 2 . The application is, therefore, allowed and the respondents are directed to refer the remaining three claims as well, with reference to the claim raised vide Advocate’s notice dated 14/10/2004. This shall be done within two weeks from today. . Application is disposed off in terms of the above directions. (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)