-1- Civil Revision No.1026 of 2011 (O&M). IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Date of Decision: February 14, 2011. Civil Revision No.1026 of 2011 (O&M). Dharam Pal Sahdev ... Petitioner VERSUS Ramesh Chander and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL. 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr.Ravindra Jain, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- MOHINDER PAL, J. The petitioner-defendant No.1, whose application for leading additional evidence in a suit filed against him and others by the plaintiff-respondents for a declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction in respect of the property in dispute has been dismissed by the trial Court, is before this Court by way of filing this revision petition for setting aside the said order of -2- Civil Revision No.1026 of 2011 (O&M). the trial Court and allowing him the relief prayed for. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the interests of justice, instead of issuing notice of this petition to the plaintiffs-respondents, I deem it expedient to dispose it of by ordering the trial Court to allow the petitioner-defendant No.1 to lead the additional evidence, as prayed for, subject to his depositing costs of Rs.10,000/- before it (trial Court). Ordered accordingly. In case the costs are paid, the same shall be paid to the plaintiffs-respondents. Resultantly, the impugned order is set aside and this petition is allowed to the extent indicated above. ( MOHINDER PAL ) February 14, 2011. JUDGE ak