CRM-M-18937-2011 (O&M) [ 1 ] ::::::::: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18937-2011 (O&M) Date of decision:12.08.2011. Mubin and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. S.K.Bawa, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Vikas Malik, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Johan Kumar, Advocate, for the complainant. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This is an application for pre-arrest bail in a case registered vide FIR No.110 dated 21.03.2011, under Section 363, 366-A, 120-B, 420, 467, 468, 471, 494 IPC at Police Station Sector-55, Faridabad, District Faridabad. Initially, the pre-arrest bail was applied by four petitioners including Mubin son of Bashir against whom the allegation is that he had enticed away his sister-in-law Anjum who was minor at that time and the other three petitioners, who happened to be the father, uncle and friend of Mubin, also helped him. At the time of notice of motion, learned counsel for the petitioners had prayed for withdrawal of the petition on behalf of Mubin, whereas arrest of the other three petitioners was stayed by this Court with the direction that they would join the investigation. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both Mubin and Anjum have got married and she made a statement under Section 164 of the CRM-M-18937-2011 (O&M) [ 2 ] ::::::::: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the Magistrate that she is 20 years of age and has tied the knot with Mubin with her own free will. On the contrary, learned counsel for the complainant argues that Anjum is a minor and the Nikah (marriage) is void. This issue is, however, a matter of evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have joined the investigation. This fact is conceded by the learned State Counsel on instructions received from ASI Mohd. Rafiq and has further submitted that Anjum has already been recovered. In view thereof, the order dated 15.06.2011 passed by this Court is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions already contained therein. The petition shall stand disposed of. August 12, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE