IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 19696 of 2009 Leela Vati ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. S.K. Sud, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana for the State. Mr. HPS Bhinder, Advocate for respondents No. 3 and 4. Mr. Randhir Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 9. RANJIT SINGH J. No reply has been filed on behalf of respondents 5 to 9. However, Mr. Rathee has placed before me order dated 11.04.2011 whereby the petitioner has been promoted against the vacant post with immediate effect. In the meantime, the petitioner has also retired. Counsel for the petitioner still says that his grievance has not been redressed fully. When asked as to on which date the promotion is due, which the petitioner has prayed, counsel says that he is not aware. That being the position, no case for further pursuing the writ petition is made out. The petitioner may file an representation, in case, she is entitled to any promotion from any interior date, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of. August 26, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH) rts JUDGE