IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2010 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 9817 of 2010(B) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.C.BALAKRISHNAN, S/O.LATE C.H.KUNHAMBU, AGED 55, RESIDING AT THAIKADAPURAM, NEELESWARAM, KASARAGOD, WORKING AS DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CRIME DETACHMENT, WAYANAD. BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE SRI.P.PRIJITH SRI.S.VAIDYANATHAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS ADDITIONAL SECRETARY, HOME (A) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ARAVIND KUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 9817 of 2010 B ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 6th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T While working as Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau, Kasaragod, the petitioner was placed under suspension as per Ext.P1 order. Pursuant to the judgment of this Court in W.P(C) No.4020/2010, the petitioner was re-instated in service. The grievance of the petitioner is that the period of suspension from 23-01-2010 to 25-02-2010 is not regularised. The petitioner has submitted Ext.P8 representation, in the said circumstances, before the 1st respondent to pass orders regularising the aforesaid period of suspension. However, no action has been taken thereon. It is in the said circumstances that this writ petition has been filed by the petitioner. 2. When a person, who was placed under suspension, was re-instated in service, the authority competent is bound to pass orders as to how the period of suspension has to be treated. The petitioner has already submitted Ext.P8 representation carrying such a request. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of WPC.9817/2010 : 2 : with a direction to the 1st respondent to pass orders on Ext.P8, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- (C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge