IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital : the 29th day of August, 2008 First Bail Application No. 653 of 2008 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Amhad Musa @ Believe And another ……. Applicants/Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Respondent ___________________________________________________________ Arising out of Crime No. 49 of 2008 Under Sections: 420, 467, 468 IPC & 43J, 45,66, 74 of Information Technology Act, Police Station: G.R.P. Kathgodam District: Nainital Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C.J. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Ahlawat, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, Asst. Government Advocate for the State. Counter affidavit has been filed. < Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the allegations against the accused-petitioners, I find that it is a fit case where the petitioners should be released on bail. The petition is allowed. The petitioners are directed to be released on bail on their executing a bail bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M.(Railways), Haldwani. If the petitioners are unable to furnish sureties, the learned A.C.J.M. shall accept the case equivalent to be deposited by the petitioners in lieu of the sureties. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 29.08.2008 A IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL MCRC No. 1120 of 2008(Modification Application) in First Bail Application No. 653 of 2008 Ahmad Musa and another ….…… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand ………. Respondent ….…… Mohd. Azim, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C.J. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the material placed on record, I find that no good ground is made out for modification of this Court’s order dated 29.08.2008. MCRC No. 1120 of 2008(Modification Application) is rejected. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 29.09.2008 A