IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-12515 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.04.2011 Sarabjit Singh Bedi and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Ms. Divya Godara, Advocate, for the petitioners. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that all other offences under Sections 323, 325 read with Section 34 IPC are bailable in nature, however, Section 506 IPC has been wrongly invoked to make the offence non-bailable. She has further stated that giving threat that in future if you meet me I will kill you, will not amount to unconditional threat and will not constitute offence under Section 506 Part II. She has further stated that since all the offences are bailable and Section 506 IPC has been wrongly invoked, therefore, petitioners shall surrender before the Ilaqa Magistrate on 5.5.2011 and shall seek regular bail therefrom. Learned counsel has sought permission to withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. Petitioners shall surrender before the Magistrate on or before 5.5.2011 as undertook by learned counsel for the petitioners. In the event of moving regular bail application, same shall be decided at its own merit without any undue delay. (Alok Singh) Judge April 27, 2011 R.S.