IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6757 of 2009. Date of Decision : 5.4.2010. Ranbir Singh ......Petitioner Versus Mandir/Murati Thakur Ji & others ......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. M.K. Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.1 and 2. Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Mr. Sushil Jain, Advocate, for respondent No.4. None for respondent No.5. Mr. Lekhraj Nandal, AAG Haryana, for respondent No.6. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) This defendant No.1's revision is directed against the order dated November 3rd, 2009 (Annexure P-9) passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Faridabad, whereby, he ordered that the application filed under Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure by the petitioner and application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC filed by the plaintiff shall be disposed of on November 24th, 2009. 2. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the trial Court should have firstly decided the application filed under Section 10 CPC and thereafter, application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC and both the applications should not be decided on the same date. 3. This Court cannot help observing that this petition Civil Revision No. 6757 of 2009. (2) is rather mis-conceived and it manifestly highlights the tendency of litigants to rush to this Court over trifles. 4. When two or more applications are made before the trial Court, it will be entirely its discretion to decide them simultaneously on one date of hearing or separately on two dates of hearing. It has not been shown that any prejudice shall be caused to the case of the petitioner if both the applications are decided on one single day. This Court would rather welcome and appreciate if the trial Courts decide the applications as expeditiously as is possible paving the way for speedy disposal of cases. 5. The revision petition is patently without merit and is dismissed. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 5.4.2010. SN