IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15255 of 2008 Between: 1 Smt. J. Smarana W/o. Sreenivas H.No. 2-6-25/C. Pitlambase, Medak 2 Smt. K. Kavitha Rani W/o. Selvaraj R/o. H,.No. 1-12-29/22, Ajay Nagar Colony, Medak. 3 Smt. M. Sailaja W/o. Kashinatham R/o. H.No. 1-10-71/14/5/3, Venkat Rao Nagar Colony, Medak. 4 Smt. B. Surekha W/o. Ram Prasad R/o. H.No. 2-11-51/6/C/A/1, Rikshaw Colony, Medak. 5 Smt. L. Gunasri W/o. Gopal Reddy R/o. H.No. 1-12-31/A/6, Indrapuri Colony, Medak. 6 Smt. K,. Parvathi W/o. Chandra Sekhar R/o. H.No. 2-11-43/3, Sanjeevaiah Colony, Medak. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Women &n Child Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector & Chairman D..E.P./S.S.A. Medak District at Sanga Reddy. 3 The Regional Deputy Director, Women Development & Child Welfare Department, Hyderabad. 4 The Project Director, District Women and Child Development Agency I.C.D.S. Medak District at Sanga Reddy. 5 The Child Development Project Officer, I.C.D.S. Project, Medak, Medak District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.RAJ KUMAR RUDRA The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the Respondent authorities in not allotting the centre to the petitioners to work as Anganwadi worker after completion of Job Course training as illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable and consequently direct the respondent authorities to allot respective centers to the petitioners to work as Anganwadi worker and to pay the salary along with all attendant benefits as per their appointment orders on par with other similarly situated persons those who have completed the job course training along with petitioners.” Sri Raj Kumar Rudra, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the writ petition in terms of letter, dated 01.04.2009 filed by him in the Registry. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, interim order, dated 24.07.2008 is vacated, WPMP.No.19747 of 2008 is dismissed and WVMP.No.2649 of 2008 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 2nd APRIL, 2009. kvni