IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 4TH JULY 2008 / 13TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 23299 of 2006(W) ------------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: ---------------------- 1. AJITH KUMAR, S/O.PARAMESWARA PILLAI, PRUMPALLIL HOUSE, THODUPUZHA VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA, DISTRICT. IDUKKI. 2. TRIVIKRAMAN, SURABHI (MULAKIL) MONIPPALLI, DIST.KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.REGHU KOTTAPPURAM RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, STATE OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER, KOTTAYAM. 3. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R.), THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R.), MEENACHIL TALUK, PALA, DIST.KOTTAYAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.V.MANOJKUMAR R1 TO R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.23299/2006 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT In this writ petition, the challenge is against the revenue recovery proceedings initiated against the petitioners for recovery of the dues under the Abkari Act. 2. The petitioners now submit that, in order to take the advantage of Ext.P12 Amnesty Scheme, they are proposing to submit Ext.P11 application. It is stated that, as a condition of Ext.P12, the cases that are pending have to be withdrawn. In order to satisfy the said condition, petitioners seek leave to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to their contentions and with liberty to pursue Ext.P11 application seeking the benefit of Ext.P12 scheme. Taking note of the submissions made as above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioners to pursue Ext.P11 application for the benefit of Ext.P12 scheme framed by the respondents. ANTONY DOMINIC vi JUDGE 2 vi.