IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.938 of 2007 SURESH CHANDRA YADAV Versus KALANAND YADAV ----------- 3/ 16-07-2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This petition has been filed for restoration of S.A. No. 89 of 2006 which stood dismissed for default due to non- compliance of order dated 30.11.2006 by which two weeks’ time was allowed to learned counsel for the appellant to comply the order of the Lawazima Board dated 3.11.2006 with respect to deposit of deficit court fee stamps worth Rs.745.10 paise. From the averments made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the statements made in the petition, it appears that genuine reasons have been shown which prevented the petitioner from complying with the order dated 30.11.2007. In the said circumstances this petition is allowed and Second Appeal No. 89 of 2006 is restored to its original file and number. However, this order will be subject to filing of the aforesaid amount of deficit court fee stamp, within one week from today. B.Tiwary/ ( S. N. Hussain, J )