IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 1645 of 2009 Between: Kopanathi Satyam, S/o. K. Sattiraju, R/o. H.No. 12/13/222, Street No. 16, Venkateshwara Nilayam, Tarnaka, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, PS Osmania University, Hyderabad. 2 T. Mahesh, S/o. late Anjaiah, R/o. 6-109, Behind Veera Hanuman Temple, Bojiwada Karimnagar District, C/o. T. Sriramulu, Advocate, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, Order or direction, more particularly in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce the detune Ms. K. Subashini D/o. K. Satyam, R/o. H.No. 12/13/222, Street No. 16, Venkateshwara Nilayam, Tarnaka, Hyderabad, before this Hon'ble Court and set her at liberty forthwith and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.S.V.INDIRA Counsel for the Respondent No.: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION No.1645 of 2009 ORAL ORDER : (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R.Varma) When the matter came up for consideration, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and, therefore, nothing remains for adjudication in the writ petition. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, at the stage of admission. However, there shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA _________________________ JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO 23-06-2009 Msr. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION No.1645 of 2009 23-06-2009 (Msr)