HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition(s) No. 2623_of2007 Petitioners :0 tt:' 1) Kamlesh ChandraSinghsar, aged about 42 years, S/6. Shri Dev Sharan Singhsar, Assistant Teacher, Primary Schoo!, Petolj. 2) Smt. Pramila, aged about 42 years, W/o. Shri S.R. Darro Assistant Teacher, Primary Schooi, Kodagaon, Patslpara. 3) Shyam Singh Netam,aged about 39 years, S/o.Shri Navalsingh Netam, AssistantTeaclTer, Primary Schooi, Kodagaon, Patelpara, 4) Raghunath Sahu, aged about 47 years, S/o. Late Shri H.R.Sahu, Assistant Teacher, Primary School Kodagaon, Patelpara, Ail are at Block Kanker, Dist. Kanker, CG. Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, CG. 2) The Director, Public Instruction Department, Raipur, CG 3) District Education Officer, Kanker Djstrict Kanker, CG. 4) Biock Education Officer, Kanker, CG. 5) Treasury & Funds Department, Kanker, CG (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution oftndia). (SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice SatishK. Agnihotri) PRESENf: - ~ - - - ~ - - - - Shri D.K. Prajapati, counsei forthe petitioners. Ku. Sunita Jain, Panet Lawverfor the State. Respondents .2- Raju ORAL ORDER (Passedon 1 May 2007) The question of law involved herein as to whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initia! appointment or from the date of comDletion of probation period. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as weli as for the State/respondents jointly submitthat the facls and question of law involvec) in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Writ Petition (S) No. 5976 of 2006 (Sushi! Tiwari & others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & others), which was aliowed vide order dated 7-11 -2006. In view of the above stated submission made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is ailowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge