1 ca443.11 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 443 OF 2011 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 366 OF 2009 Shri Surenderabhai Kirtikar Shah (Deceased) Siddhrthbhai S. Shah & ors. ....Applicants. Vs. Vijaykumar Jamnadas Parikh & ors. ....Respondents Mr. Asif Y. Memon i/b. S.R. Saudagar, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. Javed Akhtar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3, 4A, 4B, 4C, 5 to 7. CORAM:- GIRISH GODBOLE, J DATED:- AUGUST 17, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard Shri Asif Memon and Mr. Akhtar. This Civil Application is for bringing heirs of deceased Original Applicant on record. The same is strongly opposed by the Advocate for the Respondents. However, considering averments in paragraphs 11 and 12 and the fact that the provisions of Order 22 of the Code will not be strictly applicable to a CRA u/s 115 of the Code; the Application deserves to be allowed. Even if it is assumed that the provision of Order 22 is 2 ca443.11 applicable, sufficient ground is made out for condoning the delay and setting aside the abatement. Hence, Application allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c). Amendment to be carried out within four weeks. (GIRISH GODBOLE, J)