IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1192 of 2007 SATYA NARAYAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 25/07/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties. This contempt application has been filed for alleged violation of the order dated 20.6.2006 passed in C.W.J.C.No.610 of 2005. By the said order, the authorities were directed to consider the representation of the petitioner and dispose of the same by speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the order. From Annexure-B to the supplementary show cause filed on behalf of opposite party no.4, it appears that the representation of the petitioner has been disposed of and he has been granted promotion with effect from 13.3.1982. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was entitled to promotion from earlier date. Since the date of promotion was not directed by this Court to be considered while considering representation of the petitioner, - 2 - in my view, no case for initiating a proceeding of contempt is made out. This application is accordingly dismissed. However, petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge the order passed on his representation, in accordance with law. Pradeep/ (J.N.Singh,J.)