1 S.B.Cr.Misc. II Bail App. No. 1258/2008 (Narayan Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 27/03/2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Ramesh Purohit for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and challan papers as also the statement of prosecution witnesses so far recorded by the trial court. The trial court has recorded the statements of as many as six witnesses. Most of the material witnesses have been examined by the trial court. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that almost all witnesses admitted that prior to the occurrence the deceased went with one Sohanlal and for 7-8 days she remained with him and even on the day prior to her death, she went with Sohanlal. The only allegation is that on this issue of deceased going with unknown person and remaining with him for number of days, there was some quarrel. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, this cannot be said that the death of the deceased was due to or in connection with demand of dowry. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the evidence of the material witnesses, without commenting on the merit of the case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused 2 petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Narayan Lal S/o Late Shri Kanhaiya Lal Mali be released on bail in FIR No. 138/06 P.S. Asind, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP