IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 2461 of 2010 Date of Decision: 4.3.2010 Dilawar Singh ....Petitioner. Versus Registrar, Cooperative Societies and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. P.K. Rohilla, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. In this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 11.12.2006 (Annexure P-12) whereby he upon having been found in drunken condition on 29.8.2006 during duty hours was dismissed from service by respondent No.3, and also the orders dated 3.8.2009 and 10.12.2009 (Annexures P-13 and P-15, respectively) passed by respondents No.1 and 2 dismissing the appeals preferred by the petitioner against the said order. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the file. A perusal of the order dated 11.12.2006 (Annexure P-12) passed by respondent No.3-Managing Director clearly shows that the petitioner had appeared before him for personal hearing on 5.12.2006 and admitted that on 29.8.2006, he was in drunken condition. CWP No. 2461 of 2010 -2- Respondent No.3 on the basis of the admission made by the petitioner before him and the enquiry report, found him guilty and had ordered for the dismissal of the petitioner from service. On a specific query put to the learned counsel for the petitioner that in light of the admission made by the petitioner before the Managing Director-respondent No.3, how could he challenge the order of dismissal, he except for his averment that the dismissal order is bad for want of supply of the enquiry report, could not show that no admission was ever made by the petitioner before respondent No.3, as recorded in the order (Annexure P-12). Moreover, the appeal filed by the petitioner was also dismissed on the ground of non-maintainability. In view of the above, this Court is satisfied that there is no ground to interfere with the impugned order in exercise of its jurisdiction under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed in limine. March 4, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE