IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 8TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 27487 of 2009(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- VADAKARA PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD.NO.1857,KAKKATTIL P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY BY ADV. SRI.V.G.ARUN SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. KERALA CO-OPERATIVE TRIBUNAL THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KOZHIKODE. 3. P.RADHAKRISHNAN, S/O.CHANDU NAIR, PAVOOR HOUSE, THAROPOIL P.O. PONMERI (VIA) KOZHIKODE. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. BIJOY CHANDRAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J ............................................... W.P(C) No. 27487 of 2009 ................................................. Dated this the 30th day of September, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a co-operative bank. In respect of repayment of loan amounts by the 3rd respondent, the 3rd respondent raised a dispute under Section 69 of the Kerala Co- operative Societies Act, in respect of interest payable on the loan amount. The 2nd respondent, Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies passed Ext.P5 award in which the 3rd respondent has been given some benefit in the matter of payment of interest. The petitioner challenged the same before the Tribunal and by Ext.P6 order, the Tribunal confirmed the order of Joint Registrar. The petitioner challenges Exts.P5 and P6 orders. 2. I have gone through Exts.P5and P6 orders. I am of opinion that the Joint Registrar and the Tribunal has considered the matter in the right perspective and gave some relief to the 3rd respondent in the matter of payment of interest, to which the 3rd respondent was found entitled to. I am not inclined to exercise my discretionary jurisdiction in favour of the petitioner to interfere with the impugned orders in so far as I do not find W.P(C) No. 27487 of 2009 -2- anything perverse or unsustainable in the said orders. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE rhs