^^ 4rs^ . ^ HON'BLE H^^COURT OF CHI^TTISGARH AT BILASPUR CIVILREVISON N0 3^/200. Applicant (Plaintiff) ^"j^""" ?y 'Bhawani Shanker S/o Shri Chamru Ram Mahobia, Aged about 51 Years, Occupation - Advocate, R/o Chhuikhadan, Tehsil Chhuikhadan, Police Station ~ Chhuikhadan, Distt. Rajnandgaon-(C.G.) Versus Non-ApDlicants L' ..^ 3. Anil S/o Padmakar Prasad, Aged about 48 years, R/o Brahman Para, Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon-(C.G.) Ramesh Naiyyar, Editor; Dainik Bhaskar Samachar Patra, Rajbandha Maidan, Raipur, Tehsil & Distt. Raipur- (C.G.) Sudhir Agrawal, Printer / Publisher - Dainik Bhaskar Raipur Samachar Patra, R.C.Printers, Rajbandha Maidan, Press Complex, Raipur, Tehsil & Distt. Raipur-(C.G.) Ramesh Agrawal, Proprietor Dainik Bhaskar Samachar Patra, Rajbandha Maidan Press Complex Raipur, Tehsil & Distt. Raipur- (C.G.) CIVIL REVISION U/S 115 OF THE CODE QF CIVIL PROCEDURE .^^ % .^•'^^""^•^ ^ ^^"....-•""^ 4. WTCCT ^^n^ ^3:5^;^TPTTc;5?T, tp-a1wi<»,Rom^ .:...u^....^... 3TT^9T q^P (l3^36R5) W^20^. 3TT^^TcRTRr|icb cTSTT3TT^^Tw+licp ^ 1 g^TTW^rf^TOT^^T S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. A^ 30.3.2010 Shri Ratan Pusty, Advocajt The instant revision is d| decree 24.10.2007, passed Khairagarh, District Rajnandggjo affirming the judgment and de^i the Civil Judge Class-1, Khair| whereby and whereunder the apjplicant rected against the judgment and by Additional District Judge, on, in Civil Appeal No. 3-B/06, ree dated 01.05.2006 passed by agarh in civil suit No. 28-B/97 t's suit has been dismissed. involvertient The brief facts of the casel A news was published on| news paper regarding involve^ punishable under Section 379 o1| Feeling aggrieved by the a suit for recovery of Rs. 25,000| The said suit was a finding that the said new^ w^ the reputation of the plaintiff. Appeal filed there-against said findTng. Shri Pusty, learned cour would contend that the orders are patently illegal and deserve cpi<i[o'4^i +ii+ioV^'I^^ xRi^i^ ^3rf^T3TT^5T larwal e for the applicant. 1 are as under: 105.08.1996 in the Dainik Bhaskar of applicant in the offence IIPC. ^aid news, the applicant instituted |r-asdamages. s|ed by the trial court and recorded ^s not published in order to harm |was also dismissed affirming the ^sel appearing for the applicant ()assed by both the courts below be set aside. ^. ) XI-HC-78 ^wf^W^S, W^\\i<W<o, ^l^W^. *11*101 ^m^ an^^T q^q> (^cii^ci^) WL20 STT^^TWRi^icb ?CT3n^§T3Wcj? ^* :ahu ?^iTW ^Tf^T 3TI^5T Having heard the coun( having perused the records of c( order impugned passed by both| substance in the instant revisicln the courts below is essentially ^ to point out any illegality or perv^ the courts below. ^el appearing for the applicant, >urt below and having perused the |the courts below, 1 do not find any \. The findings recorded by both finding of fact. Shri Pusty failed srsity in the orders passed by both It is trite law that unles^ without jurisdiction or the find| court should not interfere with c4 the courts below in exercise of ifls In view of foregoing, substance is liable to be and h costs. cpi<iio<n»i+ii+ioT^r'i^i<£i^Rit$i<< ^3rf^RT3TT^5T the order is patently illegal or ngs recorded are perverse, this »ncurrentfinding arrived at by both s revisional jurisdiction. the revisions being devoid of hereby dismissed. No order asto Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge