HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR PETITIONERS/: (Defendants) Writ Petition (Art. 2271 No.6322 of2011 1. Patilal S/o Ram Singh @ Rai Singh, aged about 60 years, Caste Gond 2. Bhurawa S/o Samaru, aged about 45 years 3. Chhota S/o Motilal, aged about 40 years 4. Rama S/o Motilal, aged about 30 years 5. Ram Singh, S/o Not known, aged about 42 years 6. Krishna S/o Not known, aged about 65 years All Petitioners No.1 to 6 are residents of village Dhanoli Tahasil Pendra Road Distt. Bilaspur C.G. RESPONDENTS/: (Plaintiff) 2. Versus Aghariya Bai W/o Patiram, D/o Ram Singh @ Rai Singh, aged about 45 years, R/o village Harradih Gangpur, presently residing at village Dhanoli Tahasil Pendraroad, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Distt. Bilaspur C.G. {Writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India} Present: Mr. Yogendra Chaturvedi, counsel forthe petitioners. None present for respondent No.1. Mr. Akhil Agrawal, Panel Lawyerfor the State/respondent No.2. Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma. J \ ORDER (7-12-2011) 1. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged legality and propriety of the order dated 9-8- 2011 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pendra Road, in Misc. Civil Appeal No.71-A/2011, whereby while reversing the order dated 24- 11-2010 passed by the Civil Judge Class-ll, Pendra Road, in Civil Suit uS ^. %., -^' ,ft'/ 'fas'" ,jf No.53A/2010, by which the application for injunction dismissed by the Court below, has been allowed and temporary injunction has been granted in favour of respondent No.1 herein. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the order impugned, copy of order dated 24-11-2010, copy of plaint and copy of written statement. 3. As per para 8 of the order dated 24-11-2010 passed by the Civil Judge Class-11, Pendra Road, suit for declaration and permanent injunction filed on behalf of defendant No.1 Patilal has been dismissed relating to same land along with other property. Considering previous decision, by allowing the application and granting injunction, the lower appellate Court has not committed any illegality requiring interference. Consequently, the petition is liable to be dismissed and it is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. 4. I.A.No.1 standsdisposed of. Soma T.P. Sharma Judge