Sing!® 1 IN THE mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NO.S-aoS: /2004 :":! 1: •H y PETITIONER i;!!:l .jUttitUil £ ?.^. ^J?%^ •...-••••^'^^;-^;"^.- ^ <s -^^-^r"""' yte^"--;,,...^^ ^-e- s RESPONDENTS :Smt. Neeta Srivastav W/o Late Pawan Kumar ;edabout 32 years R/o Sahaspur Ijohara, Tehsil- Kawardha DistKabirdham(C.G) Versus 1. SiBt.RajkumariSoni 1| W/ofiatdevSoni . ' ; .1 Aged about 38 years : RV6 SahaspurjL,ohara,Tehsil-Kawardtia Dii,tKabirdham(C.G) StateofChhattisgarh Through the Director of Panchayat D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur(C.G) '3. Collector/District Magistrate, Kabirdham Dist-Kabirdham(C.G) WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTI0N QE ^.o^ w. ^ INDIA FGR ISSUANCE DE AiSUITABL&WRIT QRDER OF!DIREG;'n'ON DO JUSTICE IN THEMATTER. -Sfe :«r: .tlt. HIGHCOURTQFCHHATTISGARH:BlLASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETITION N0.5005 OF 2004 Smt. NeetaSrivastav RESPONDENTS Versus Smt. Rajkumari Soni & others (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'bleShri Satish K. Agrtihotri, J. Present:- Shri H.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Deputy Government Advocate.for the State. ^ •< 2. ORDER(ORAL) (Passedonthis1stdayofApril,2010) Challenge in the petitipn is to the order dated 22-7-2004 (Annexure- P/2) passed by the ColleGtor, Kabirdham,in case no. 10/B-121 year 2003-04, by which the appeal preferred by the petitioneragainst theappointment^ftherespondentno. 1 herein was rejected. The petitioner also challenges the order dated 3-11 -2004 (Annexure-P/1) passed by the Director (Panchayat) Chhattisgarh, Raipur in revision case no.221/ A-89/2004-05 (Smf. Neeta Shrivasfav V/s Smt. Rajkumari Son/ & another) whereby and whereunder the stay granted earlier has been vacated. It isinformed, atthe bar, thatearlieragainstthe nonselection of the petitioner hereinon the postofAnganbadi worker, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Collector, Kabirdham, which was rejected on 27-2-2004. Being aggrieved by the said order the petitioner preferred 1'evision i^i Gowri before the Director (Panchayat) in which by order dated 5-10-2004 stay was granted in favour of the petitioner. However, the Director (Panchayat), after considering the original records by order dated 3-11-2004 vacated the stay order dated 5-10-2004. Thus, the petitioner filed the present petition. It is further informed that during pendency of this petition the revision preferred by the petitioner was also rejected by the Director (Panchayat) thus, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication and the same has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. -— — Sd/- satislt K-Agnjbotri ^ } ..