IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.5824 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.05.2009 Hari Pal Verma .......Petitioner Versus Malkiat Kaur ....Respondent Present: Mr. O.P. Goyal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anjana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anuj Raura, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for both the parties represent that there has been a compromise between the parties. A memorandum of compromise has been entered into and signed by both of them on 28.05.2009. Memorandum of compromise is taken on record. 2. The civil revision petition is dismissed in terms of compromise and the memorandum of compromise shall form part of this order. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE May 30, 2009 Pankaj*