Manoj Kumar Versus State of Haryana Crl. Misc. No.45173 of 2011 in/and Crl. Misc. No.19780-M of 2011 Present: Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Sushma Chopra, Addl. AG, Haryana. --- Petitioner seeks concession of interim temporary bail on the ground that his wife requires to be operated upon. Believing petitioner, he had been granted concession of interim temporary bail for a period of 15 days but on account of certain medical complications, his wife was not operated upon. Thereafter, the petitioner came with a date of operation as 29.08.2011. Case was adjourned to find out if the wife has undergone operation so that relief could be granted to the petitioner. It is reported that, despite having been admitted in hospital for operation for 29.08.2011 she was not operated upon. It has now been submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the operation is fixed for 5th or 6th of September, 2011. Taking into consideration totality of the circumstances, I do not find any ground to grant the concession of interim temporary bail to the petitioner. Dismissed at this stage. No extention can be granted to the petitioner of the interim temporary bail. (M.M.S. BEDI) 01.09.2011 JUDGE manju