:-^^^ II-':'PI ^^s XI-HG—78 HI*1CTI (bNT^» "3^ '<ii^i<n^, 8>ti1-M<i<o, fstdt-y1^ l^,P CS-) . y^o. ^^^^/< "^ 200 3n^T "q^T ('y^'l^) ^n^r ^T f<4job TT^TT ^TT^TSF^NF ^HW^lf^T3T^T about Distt. F Uma Patel, Nagod^ hr 'WTOf ^f 'fe^ <ps<^« ^3ffim3:n?5T PETITIONERS 1. Dayaratii Saliu, S/o Budhram Sahu, aged 3. Mohanl aged a( Tahsill (ExOM^ previoit eligibil^ Teaheil; p9 years, R/o Baya, Talisil Kasdol, paipLir (CG) ^hankar Patel, S/o Chakradhar |aged about 45 years^ R/o village [, Tal-isil Kasdol, Distt. Raipur (CG) Lal Deewan, S/o Chaitraiii Deewan, bout 38' years, R/o village Nagoda, |<:asdol, Distt. Raipur (CG) insevl Saliayak Shikshak, 1. State Secreti Educa 2, Coniml Depar") Pu'blicl 3. Deput] isly appointed on due selection and |ties against tlie vacaiit post ofAsstt. ^, under the Education Department) Versus of Chhattisgarh, |iry, Depm-tment ttirough the of School bion, D.K.S. Bhawaji, Raipur (CG) Issioncr of Public In.structions, ;ment of Education, Directorate of Instructions, Raipur, Distt. Raipur r Du-ector of PubMc Instructions, Educajtion Department, Raipur, Distt. Raipu}- (CG) 4. Biock| Raipuj Education Ofilcer^ Kasdol^ Distt. -(CG) f/ .—^ r 1 ^^^•"" -:i i ^^;^' J^ ^jy^ Hl*1dl ^»*<ra» ^^T ^ii^Kn^, ^Ti)^^i(o, [®trni<4^< (jj^.rs^ ^. szsLilo'^ ^""""••'""•"•••""""•"•""••""••"""^200 ^^f XC^^ (<l?(sq<i?) 3Fi1^?T ^iT ftl^Jc^ WT 3TT^T ^IW ^RnW^rf^T3^T^T Writ Petitioa VfA 226/ 8^B^HONi^LE_SHRIDmREN! 22.09.2008 Sliri S.K. Bajpai, counsei Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. ( Heard. Grievance of fhe petitioi Sahayak Shikshak on 21st Mai upto 31st May,"t991 i.e. for a Similaily situated ofher pers| Defore fhe State Admiiiistratil disposed ofby the Trilnuial oij directious were passed fpr re| petition. Leamed counsel for thl petition may also be disposed representation before the conc| considered iii accordaiice with I the siiatter has becom.e stald raonflis and 10 days way bacl^ cM<4i<yt<J1l *1W<yiT "^f f^&i ifal^K ^sTRw^n^y (227 of tlae Coastitution of ladia >RAMISHRA,J. for tlie petitioners, jovt. Advocate for tlie State, Lers is tliat they were appoiiited as Up- :ch, 1991. They worked in fh.at capacity period ofalaiost 2 33ionths aiid 10 days, ^iis prefeiTed appMcatioii for diTection /e Tribunal aiid tlieii* application was 16-2-1996. In tliat application, certain. appoiiitinent of fEe petitioners of tha-t a petitioners submits fhat the ixistaiit rfwifli Ubertir to tlie petitioners to iiiake eined aufhorities aad the sanie niay be law. On fhe otlier haiid, leaitGed coiuisel for tlie State submits that as tlie petitioners worked only for 2 in tlie year 1991 in tiie undivided State ?im^r ^T g^n^r, <M'ii^i'H —FS/197—3/2Q08/—40,000. r^!T'-'.. ^y:h "" )^ I •^^^-,., ^""- ^H^T'SRT fqiw SH^TiFRW CWT'W o < 'c~^p HWVll <1»*11<1» TS[ ^|-Mid<LI, ^•(-i^ts, Tsxni-yy to.P.O.No.^j n^--"":""-;:-"""""""'"""""^'2oo ^?r 'XRW (<ic(isqVsr) ^wi^R ii a 3??^T of Madhya Pradesh, The peti^ regulari^ation or contiiiuan.ce ^ • Haviag heai'd leamed c4 tlie fact tliat the petitioners we|: Shikshak way back in fhe ye^ aiid 10 days and fhus the regulaTization. The petition is disiiiissed| ioners do not have any right to claiiB. per the settled law. •iinsel for fhe parties, having regard t.o :e only em.ploye.d as teinporar}^ Saliayak :, 1991 and worked oaly for 2 months pe|itioners do not have aiiy legal right of ohl^id41^ "^W^f ^ffe^ if^t^K ^^ffm^n^r Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge ?l^^T ^T SOT^T, WWW —FS/197—3/2Q08,—40,000. ^