IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 5 OF 2011 IN CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 5 OF 2010 SHRI. RAMAKANT R. HARMALKAR (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LR'S AND 2 ORS., ... Appellants Versus MRS. MYRA MURIEL LOBO E PAUL, ... Respondent Mr. V. P. Thali, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. Kankonkar, Advocate for respondent. Coram:- S.A. BOBDE & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 25th July, 2011 P.C.:- Both the parties state that the matter may be listed before the learned Single Judge for admission. We are not inclined to entertain this Letter Patent Appeal only on the ground that according to the appellants certain decisions taken into consideration by the learned Single Judge have no application to the case and some decisions are not considered. It would be better if the matter was considered by the learned Single Judge afresh at the admission stage. 2. In the circumstances, Letter Patent Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to approach the learned Single Judge, on all points raised herein. All the issues including the observations made by the learned Single Judge in the order passed in Civil Review Application are left open. Order accordingly. S.A. BOBDE, J. F. M. REIS, J. at*