IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.585 of 2009 FAIZ MURTAZA ALI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 5.03.2010 The petitioner’s sole grievance is that he had filed a suit for declaring a will to be forged and fabricated way back in the year 2000. There is little progress in the matter in the court below. He wants a direction from this Court to the court below to close the proceedings within a specified time. I am unaware of the reasons for the delay. All I can say is that the court below would consider the fact that the suit is a decade old and should receive the due attention of the Court in its early disposal of the case. An application for intervention has been filed for impleadment of the intervenor as party respondent here who is the plaintiff in the court below. In my view the intervention application is misconceived. The intervenor would have liberty to move the court below for any relief that it seeks which the court below would decide in accordance with law. With the above observations and directions the writ petition stands disposed of. V.K. Pandey (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)