CR No.2266 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR No.2266 of 2010 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 20.05.2010 **** Ram Singh . . . . Petitioner VS. Krishan and another . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN **** Present: - Mr.Raman Mohinder, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Munish K. Singla, Advocate for respondent No.1. **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against order dated 28.11.2009 passed by Additional District Judge, Sangrur whereby, application for ad interim injunction filed by the plaintiff/respondent No.1 has been allowed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a co-sharer to the extent of 1/3rd share in the land measuring 20 Kanals 11 Marlas and respondent No.1 is in exclusive possession thereof. It is submitted that after the correction of Girdawari w.e.f. Sauni 2005, no reliance could be placed on the Jamabandi for the year 2000-2001, which has been relied upon by the Courts below. Insofar as the share of the petitioner is concerned that has not been denied by respondent No.1. However, it is argued by learned counsel for CR No.2266 of 2010 (O&M) -2- respondent No.1 that the entries contained in the Jamabandi would prevail. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that after correction in Khasra Girdawari w.e.f. Sauni 2005, in which the petitioner is also shown to be co-sharer, it would be just and expedient, if the parties are directed to maintain status quo with regard to 1/3rd share of the land i.e. 6 Kanals 17 Marlas of the petitioner in the total land measuring 20 Kanals 11 Marlas, which is alleged to have been purchased by him vide sale deed dated 17.5.2004. With these observations, present revision petition is disposed of. Both the parties to the lis are directed to maintain status quo with regard to land measuring 6 Kanals 17 Marlas owned by the petitioner till the decision of the suit. Civil Revision is disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 20.5.2010 JUDGE Vivek