1 wp-10905-11 & ors.sxw Mmj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10905 OF 2011 Mr. Sunil Hariprasad Gaud .. Petitioner Versus The Commissioner, Vasai Virar City Corporation & Ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10906 OF 2011 Mr. Deepak Premanand Galiya .. Petitioner Versus The Commissioner, Vasai Virar City Corporation & Ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10907 OF 2011 Mr. Raju Ramakant Sharma .. Petitioner Versus The Commissioner, Vasai Virar City Corporation & Ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10916 OF 2011 Mr. Kolamdeshu Ratnam Shetty .. Petitioner Versus The Commissioner, Vasai Virar City Corporation & Ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10952 OF 2011 Mr. Sanjay Achechelal Halwai .. Petitioner Versus The Commissioner, Vasai Virar City Corporation & Ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9457 OF 2011 Mr. Ramkeval Kedan Sharma .. Petitioner Versus The Commissioner, Vasai Virar City Corporation & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.M.P.Mishra & Mr.Bhagwan Mishra for the Petitioners in all the Petitions. Mr. Atul G Damle for the Respondents in all the Petitions. CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATED : 21st December, 2011 2 wp-10905-11 & ors.sxw P.C. 1 The above Petitions take exception to the Orders all dated 20-9-2011 passed by the Learned District Judge, Vasai, by which Order, the Appeals filed by the Respondent Corporation came to be allowed and resultantly the Order passed on Applications Exhibit 5 for temporary injunction in the suits filed by the Petitioners above named in each of the above Petitions came to be set aside. 2 In an identical fact situation involving unauthorised construction and notices being issued by the Respondent Corporation for demoliton of the same being a group of petitions being Writ Petition No.9407 of 2011 and companion matters, this Court by Order dated 23-11-2011 has dismissed the said Petitions. In view of the said Order dated 23-11-2011, the above Petitions would also have to be dismissed for the reasons stated in the said Order. The above Petitions are accordingly dismissed. 3 The Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners applies for some protection so as to enable the Petitioners to file appropriate proceedings to challenge the Order passed in the instant petitions. Upon this, the Learned Counsel for the Respondent Corporation Mr. Damle states that out of the 6 petitions, the structures in three Petitions being Writ Petition Nos.10907 of 2011, 10916 of 2011 and 10952 of 2011, 3 wp-10905-11 & ors.sxw have already been demolished. The Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners Mr. Mishra states that his instructions are that the structure in Writ Petition No.10952 of 2011 is not demolished. 4 Be that as it may, it is not necessary to go into the aspect at this stage. However, by recording the statement made by the learned Counsel for the Corporation that three structures have already been demolished. The parties are directed to maintain status-quo up to 5-1-2012. ( R. M. SAVANT, J. )