IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY RDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION RDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION RDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 642 OF 2005. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 642 OF 2005. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 642 OF 2005. IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.700 OF 2005. WRIT PETITION NO.700 OF 2005. WRIT PETITION NO.700 OF 2005. Rashtriya Shramik Sanghatana and Suraksha Rakshak Kendra ..Petitioner versus 1. The Security Guards Board for Gr.Bombay & Thane Dist. & Ors ..Respondents. And Wipro Spectramind Services Limited .. Applicant Ms. Ranjana Todankar and Mr. Susheel Mahadeshwar for the Petitioner Mr.M.S.Topkar for the Respondent No.1 Mr. R.S.Chitnis with Mr. A. Kamat i/b. G.D.D’Silva for the applicant Coram : F.I.Rebello & Coram : F.I.Rebello & Coram : F.I.Rebello & S.R.Sathe, JJ. S.R.Sathe, JJ. S.R.Sathe, JJ. Dated : 8th Sept, 2006 Dated : 8th Sept, 2006 Dated : 8th Sept, 2006 P.C. . This is an application by the employer to relieve the employer from the statement made on their behalf and accepted by this Court and recorded in the order dated 25.11.2004. Considering what is set out in paragraph 2 of the order, clarification is not required as it is for the employer to decide in what manner he will employ security guards or not employ them and the statement made will not bar them if they follow the law. Considering the above, no further directions are required. . Motion disposed of accordingly. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (S.R.SATHE, J.)