THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 13030 of 2006 Oral order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents-APSRTC. The petitioner states that the 2nd respondent, namely the Executive Director, contrary to the transfer guidelines dated 11.03.2006, vide orders dated 06.04.2006, transferred the petitioner from Karimnagar to Vemulawada on the ground of land standing. It is his grievance that though he made representation on 25.05.2006 requesting the 2nd respondent to retain him at the present place, no orders thereon have been passed till date. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents-APSRTC, and having regard to the fact that the representation dated 25.05.2006, said to have been made by the petitioner is pending before the 2nd respondent, I consider it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: The 2nd respondent, namely the Executive Director, APSRTC, Hyderabad and Karimnagar Zones, Karimnagar, is directed to consider and dispose of the representation dated 25.05.2006, said to have been made by the petitioner, in the light of transfer guidelines, dated 11.03.2006, and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 29th June, 2006. KSR