IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 26TH JULY 2007 / 4TH SRAVANA 1929 RP.No. 321 of 2007(L) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.2218/1995 Dated 06/10/2006 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: -------------------------------------- THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, SYNDICATE BANK, ZONAL OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP.BY THE POWER OR ATTORNEY HOLDER, DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, SYNDICATE BANK, REGIONAL OFFICE, SHANMUGHAM ROAD, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, ALAPPUZHA. 2. G.SASIKALA, VEMBRALAT HOUSE, WATERLAND ROAD, PALLURUTHY, COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.T.V.AJAYAKUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.KOSHY & M.N.KRISHNAN, JJ. ------------------------------------- R.P.No.321 OF 2007 in O.P.No.2218 of 1995 & C.M.Appl.No.150 of 2007 ------------------------------------- Dated 26th July, 2007 ORDER Koshy,J . This review petition is filed contending that the case was wrongly decided. A review petition cannot be equated to a petition for rehearing of the matter or an appeal proceedings. All the decisions cited before us were considered and passed the judgment under review. If any error is committed in the judgment, it is for the petitioner to take the matter in an appeal. The judgment was dictated in open court. No grounds are stated to condone the long delay of 117 days. Hence, both delay condonation petition as well as review petition are dismissed. J.B.KOSHY JUDGE M.N.KRISHNAN JUDGE tks