Ewé WW-a! 333w: 00$. g a6,Marco: macaaAO. .v p 3E ouamawxm , Q9 mg , _ >cw ”corn __mN Kama immazigmn os. 333, mnsohvr§o§3 9mg. .. gmymmmaca m 26 Sanatan Budek S/o Shri Laia Budek, Age abaut 58 years, Head Master, Govt. Primary School. Shankarpur, DistL- Mahasamund (C.G.) ‘x‘ _; 27 Pitham Ram Bariha Slo Shri Anandi . " Ram Bariha Age about 55 years, Head Master, Govt. Primary SehooL Khursihar, Distt.- Mahasamund (C.G.) 28 Mahesh Ram Dewan S/o Shri Raghudhar Dewan Age about 54 years, U.D.T.‘ Govt. H.S. School, Bichhiya, Dist‘r.- Mahasamund (C.G.) Karam Singh Kaushik S/o Shri Mani , sirrgh Kaushik Age about 54 years, f i L.D.T., Govt. Primary ‘School, Tupakbora, Distt— Mahasamund (C.G.) 3i} Laxman Singh Diwan Sio Shri Chinta Ram Diwan, Age about 51 years, J U.D.T., Govt. Middle Schooi, Ghonch, H J r; Distt.-Mahasamund(C.G.) ‘; 31 $ube Singh Diwan S/o Shri Purru Ram ‘ Diwan Age about 54 years, L.D.T., Govt. Middle Schooi, B.K. Bahara, Distt: Mahasamund (C.G.) 32 Sampat Lai Bhoi S/o Late Shri Manbodh Bhoi, Age about 52 years, ‘ Head Master, Govt. Primary S'chooi, Kudekel, Distt.- Mahasamund (C.G.) 33 Nanhu Ram Bariha S/o Shri Mohitram Bariha, Age about 52 years, Head w‘?’ ‘* Master, Govt. Primary School, Bodapaii, Distt. — Mahasamund (C.G.) Versus State Government of Chhattisgarh Throughz- Secretary, Tribal & Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raibur (C.G.) 2 Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare i Department, Distt. - Mahasamund (C.G.) District Education Officer Dis'tt.- ‘r MahasamundiRaipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS , WRIT PETlTlON UNDER ARTICLE_226 GF THE CON$TITUTION OF lNDlA‘ Appearance: Shri Somkant Verma; counsel for the petitioners. Shri Pradeep Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State on advance copy. WP(S) No.7552/2007 ORAL ORDER (20.1 2.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J Heard. V Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the case is as to whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. He submits that the issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of MP. and others). wherein, it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.t. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court uphoiding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment. Learned counsei for the petitioners further submits that this Court, while considering the same issue in Ram Kumar Sahu and others Vs. State Govt. of C’nhattisgarh and another (W.P.(S) No.813 of 2007) by order dated 12.2.2007‘ has granted reguiar pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment Learned counsel for the parties jointly submits that this case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Ram Kumar Sahu and another (supra). However, this order shall be subject to all verifications made by the State regarding facts pieaded in the petition. in View of that, this petition is ailowed in the same terms. { Sd/— i Sunil Kumar Sinha ‘ Judge ‘