HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAKH AT BILA8PUR PETmONERS WRTTPETmONfS) No. 3639 < 1. Pardedii RamJ)hruw A&e about 54 years, Asstt. Teach^ SA> Shn RamjClUaua^^^ Pmnary Sehool Kumharpara, Distt; >—i^rtiteri (C.G.) .:,,:•,;::;;-,,,,-••:4:r;':- 2. Chandra Kuaiar Dhruw Age about 44 year, Astt. Teacher, S/o Slui B.I^Dhru^ <Tffvt;%im^ SdioolKhada-dahDistt. -Dhanutari(G.O.) 3. Ravi Shankar Nage AgeAoutK^Syear, Astt. Teacher S^ Shri B.R.Nag^ Oc^^^;^ Sch<x)tChanaga^Di -©haBabU¥;(C.O.) 4. ArehanaSafau AaeahOBtB.43»YeM'.iiAsrtt.Teaeher W/6 SIm Kta!3etrfraipt%m,SaIiu; (^t.^Kamry Sehool Kumrdha Oistt—I»iamtan(€:G.) i 5. Chandrafaas Safau Age about 39-yeats, Astt. Teacher, S/o Sfari Bisfaraw Saliu^ OQ^^aaaty SehoolSal(Mu,D»stt.-IAatnta*(e;e.> 6. Moh0nSmghKuno®Ageabort39yeaas,;Astt. Tea<^ Ste Shri MaNharamS^»a^^30ovt. Middte Sdool Genclra.IMstt;- DhaBitari^e.e.) 7. Alkha Ram Maxmade Age aboat48 yews Astt. Teadier Sfo Slm Syblii^ik Ram M^inaiejQovt, Primary Scboot Bait»s^»ur;"wQistt; ; - Mafaflsamund(C?^)2s:,,;i,,,;-.,,;;,,:'' ,.^ " 8. Sfflt. Rukhmani Satau Age afeout 45 year; Astt. TeasSwt, 'W/e S^si 'Xt^^sWwS^SMKfSfsMt, Pranary Sdiool Kwigaon ^lMstt; -Bhamtari (C.O.) . ^ . ','^;i-: -— 9. Hiachha Ram Sinha Age about 53 yeau-, Astt. TetuAer, S/o Sto B&®(^3Bam Simp. p(^ Middte School Bazar Ki.u-ri<Ult 0isK?—tiaiamtMi (C.&).:.;T-:--.---:-•.- •VEI^US- ?-^: RE8PONDENTS 1. State Govt of Chhattiagiria Tln-ou^i ^eietiay, Trible Wel^ Dqwtm^ DXS. ^ -Raipur Dij^.-Raiiw^e^.) i-^ y 2. The ComtaissionCT Trible WelfaBe <Deptu-taient, Ravishankar Umvasity Caa^iis, Disfc -g Rapur (C.G.)..^.,..--"--:-:-:-..-'1--.- 3. Astt. CQnMntS8t<»et,;ErB»le'Kettoe©q»Mtment, ' Distt. - E&anitaa:{e.a):;:SS.::.;::,S^^ 4. TUkestavar Prasad Sher Age abmit 50 years, SuperiHtatdeDt •''8/6;. 'S|ffii^,;:®;^lag2|9^||iab[ic. Adiwasi Boy's Htwtal, D&aaiteri (C.G.) ,; WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION O®INDIA .u -2- SB: Hon'bte Shri ^tfsh K. AtmBwtri. J. Present: Shri Somkant Vemu. Advoeate Ms. SumtaJaia, lto3 ORALCttaMER ^, (Passsd on 11°'day of July, SOOg) Amit 1. Leamed eounselappearing fiu-the petitioners suhmits <tatthenamesofthe petitioners in fhe padatifMt Ust have beaa down graded. The petitKMiws sh<mld have been above the respondent No. 4, on tte l»sis©fdate®f1heirreBpective appointments as well as date of regilarisattQn. Furtfaesr, the name rfprtitioaer No. 7, 8 and 9 do aot find place in 1fae said gradatUMilist. The petftionera do aot want to contest Ihe matter on merits at thissta^, how»vw,1he'pe(ttK)neEs^»ek Leamed counsel fiirtfaa- submits 1hat tfie petitiona- No. 5 bas aade rqM-esentation on 18.09.2007 (Annexure P/2)to the respondart No, 3 fw dearing the anomaly, but no acti<m taas been tialaen w ye^ petitioners may be ^anted libf^ to tmike rei»esBHtrt<aSwitbm ap one week. It is farther sutanitted thatlhe reqwndeW N& 9;«i^Ibiydife^^ te consider tfae pending represeirtation (Annesan-e P/2) as well asrepreseBitatiois filed hereinafter, as expeditiously as possible, to wtaaA'leamed^^^ appearingfi>rthe8tate'respQn<tentNo.lto3hasnoob]ecti<m. ; Thus, Ihis petition is accwdingiy xUsposed ofwith a directiontp the respondent No. 3 to consuder and decide Ae representatkmS c^tta»ip^iOBaFMoa1; to 4an(l 6 to 9 andfhe above stated rq»eseHtati<Mi[(AnneauFeP^^ffiledbyflie other petitioners i.e. 1 to 4 and 6 to 9, as early as possSrfe, ia^sKewtence witti tow, on its own merit, preferably witfaa a paiodof&in' weeteifioniiittodatoMrf. receipt ofrepresentati<ms. No orderasto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge