pvr ca442 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.442 OF 2011 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL(ST)NO.30819 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3208 OF 2011 AND LETTERS PATENT APPEAL(ST)NO.30819 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3208 OF 2011 The Divisional Forest Manager Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. ...Appellant vs. Shri.Vinayak Kurne. ...Respondent --- Mr.Nitin P.Deshpande, for Appellant. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 29th November,2011. P.C.:- 1. This Civil application is for condonation of delay in filing Letters Patent Appeal. In order to find out whether the appellant has prima facie case, we have heard the learned Counsel pvr ca442 appearing for appellant on merit. We find that admittedly the respondent was working since 1991 as Office Attendant at least till 2002. The Courts below have appreciated the evidence on record and have recorded a finding of fact that the respondent had worked for more than 240 days in a year. Considering that the orders passed by the Courts below are based on the finding of fact and considering that the respondent had actually worked for so many years with the appellant and he is only office attendant, in our opinion, there is no case to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge. In this view of the matter, therefore, no useful purpose will be served by condoning delay. The civil application and the appeal are disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.)