IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 10TH JULY 2009 / 19TH ASHADHA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 3750 of 2009() ----------------------------- CRMP.3336/2009 IN CRIME NO.606/09 OF THIRUVALLA POLICE STATION .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.4: --------------------------------------------- SURESH, S/O.THANKAPPAN, KARUTHIKALATHILAYA KUNTHARAYIL VEEDU, ANJILITHANAM MURI, KUNNAMTHANAM VILLAGE, MALLAPPALLY TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.M.T.SURESHKUMAR SRI.V.V.RAJA RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: --------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY TEH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------- B.A.No.3750 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of July, 2009 ORDER This is an application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is accused No.4 in Crime No.606 of 2009 of Thiruvalla Police Station. 2. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 395, 365 and 342 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. I have gone through the case diary. 4. It is submitted by the learned public prosecutor that the investigation is at the initial stage. There are about 15 accused persons involved in the case. Only the petitioner was arrested. The other accused persons are to be arrested. It is submitted that if the petitioner is released on bail at this stage, it would seriously affect the proper investigation of the case. 5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of the offence, the stage of investigation and the fact that the other accused persons could not be arrested so far, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The Bail Application is accordingly dismissed. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE csl