C-482 No. 614 of 2010 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Karan Anand, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Govt. Advocate with Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder, present for the State. By means of this petition, moved under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner has challenged order dated 23.06.2010, passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Rishikesh, in Criminal Revision No. 70 of 2010, Naveen Pathak and another Vs. State. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner Smt. Bharti Sharma got married to Manish Dutt Sharma on 22.10.2006, in Midway Resorts, Rishikesh. After her marriage she went to her husband’s house in Delhi. The petitioner has alleged that after sometime she was subjected to cruelty for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry, and ousted and compelled to live in her parental house in Rishikesh. After investigation, on the first information report lodged by the petitioner, a charge sheet was filed against the husband and his other relatives before the trial court. The Judicial Magistrate, Rishikesh, with whom trial was pending, after hearing the parties, passed order dated 25.02.2010, in Criminal Case No. 5246 of 2009, State Vs. Shiv Dutt Sharma and others, that there is sufficient material to frame the charge in respect of offence punishable under Section 498-A of I.P.C., and one punishable under Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. Against said order the accused Naveen Pathak and Bhawna Pathak appear to have filed a criminal revision, on which the learned revisional court allowed the revision, and set aside the order passed by the Magistrate so far as it relates to Naveen Pathak (brother-in-law / NANDOI) and Bhawna Pathak (sister-in- law NANAD). Having gone through the impugned order passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Rishikesh, and after considering the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner, in the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not find it a fit case to interfere with the impugned order. Therefore, the petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is dismissed. The trial court may proceed st of the accused in the case. against re (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 02.07.2010 HN