t, -V •^ ^ T -/—3- ^J-il^^ \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUOICATURE AT BILASPUR CIVIL REVISION N0. r~] 9 OF 2008 ^c^\y ^ PETITIONER : blarpal Singh,f'son_ of Shri ^^1(Defendant) ^. ^.^^ ^". • ...-•"<'2^'; l%^"". .^ vs RESPONbENT CPIaintiW -^ .:•/•' ;"^''-:^"'^-' Lakhvir Singh, Proprietor M/s Calcutta-Andhra Road Lines, ^carrying on the business of transpprt at: jts prfncipal place of busmess at Near Ayappa Tempte, Ring Road No.2, Tatibandh, Raipur; M/s .Tayaswats Neco Ltd., a company duly incorporated ynder the relevdnt provisions of the Compahies Act, 1956 having its i-'egtstered office at f^S, M,X.E>.C. Xnd^trial Area, Kingna ftoud; Na^pur (MS) arid its steel p 1 ant d i vi s i on situate dt " SHtard ^rowth ; C&htr^, Siltara; Rdipur through its Senior General Manager (Personnel and Administration) dnd the duly cons-tituted dtrorney Shri K.K.Shrivastava; REVISION PETITION UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CObE OF GIVIL PROCEDURE. t908 (, :I-HC—78 'sTit^.'^r k^i^ s^^lch —)C ^^ ^w^^, ^>^\w\<o, l^nRry: ^m^fT^itirai ...-±3....:... 200 g ^I^T T(^5' ('^3^t?) ^n^R Trflrr ^T^fr 5^B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N t^ 28.10.2009 Shri Kshitiz Sharma. ShriPrateekSharma, apvocate for petjtioner. ^dvocate for respondent. Learned counsel with the passage oftime this I Accordingly, the revisitn infructuous. No orderasto cdst Consequently,pendjng| S^hu ^T^f^fr? WR^ff ^* ft^ TfW^R '^'^H^iT^r Aaarwal appe^ring for the petitioner submits that 1-evJsion has become infructuous. is dismissed as having become appljcations, stand disposed of. Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge ^