1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 196 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 196 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 196 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 211 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 211 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 211 OF 2006 IN IN IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 86 OF 2006 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 86 OF 2006 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 86 OF 2006 Sujata Pradeep. Puranik. .. Applicant. vs. Pradeep Vishnu Puranik. .. Respondent. Mr. V.D. Patil for applicant. Mr. N.P. Deshpande for respondent. CORAM: J.N. PATEL &, CORAM: J.N. PATEL &, CORAM: J.N. PATEL &, A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE: 23RD JULY, 2007. DATE: 23RD JULY, 2007. DATE: 23RD JULY, 2007. P.C. . Heard. 2. The wife has preferred the application seeking injunction against the respondent-husband. The learned counsel for the other side has no objection. The Civil Application No. 196 of 2006 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 2 3. The injunction would continue to operate till the sum of Rs. 10 lacs is paid to the respondent wife for providing shelter to the wife and children. 4. Both the Civil Applications stand disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. )