IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. RFA No.3687 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 5.10.2011 Krishan Kumar & others -----Appellants Vs. Haryana State & others -----Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present:- Mr. Narender Sura, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. H.S. Lalli, Addl.A.G., Haryana Mr. Geetish Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.3/HUDA. --- RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J. C.M. Nos.8107-08-CI of 2011: After hearing learned counsel for the parties, delay of 14 days in filing and 55 days in refiling this appeal is condoned. C.M. Nos.8109-CI of 2011: RFA No.3687 of 2011 Application is allowed subject to just exceptions. Applicants as mentioned in para 2 of the application, being LRs of Raj Kumar who died on 20.4.2007 during the pendency of the reference petition, are ordered to be brought on record of this appeal only for the purpose of pursuing this appeal. RFA No.3687 of 2011: Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the instant appeal is covered by judgment of this Court dated 1.10.2011 in RFA No.1824 of 2006 (Sudama and others v. The State of Haryana and another). Accordingly, this appeal is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgment and the land owners are held entitled to compensation in terms of the aforesaid judgment. October 05, 2011 ( RAKESH KUMAR GARG ) ak JUDGE 2