ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY PETITION NO. 403 OF PETITION NO. 403 OF PETITION NO. 403 OF 2003 2003 2003 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Durgesh Singh i/by M/s. Shreeji & Lal for the petitioner. Ms. Manorama Mohanty i/by M/s. S.K.Srivastava & Co. for the respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 5th October, 2007 : 5th October, 2007 : 5th October, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The parties have reached at a compromise and accordingly signed the consent terms dated 5th October, 2007 by the authorized signatory of the petitioner and Chairman of the respondent company. The respective advocates have also signed the same. There is no dispute about the identification of parties as well as signature. The consent terms marked as "X" is taken on ( 2 ) record. The pay order of Rs.11,25,000/- (Rupees eleven lacs twenty five thousand only) as per the consent terms, has been handed over in the Court to the petitioner’s representative. 2. By order dated 17th 2005 though ordered, there was no advertisement of the petition. 3. As the parties have settled the matter, the present Company petition is disposed of in view of the Consent terms. 4. The petition is disposed of, accordingly, with liberty. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. V. V. MOHTA,J.) MOHTA,J.) MOHTA,J.)