HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No. 75 of 2009 DATE: 16-12-2010 Between: Godthi Sathyanarayana …….. petitioner and Smt. R.Vijaya Lakshmi and another …….. respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No. 75 of 2009 ORDER: Heard both sides. The only grievance of the petitioner in this Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C. is to the effect that even though substantive applications were filed to set aside the ex parte decree and also to condone the delay in filing the application to set aside the ex parte decree in a suit, which has been decreed ex parte where the relief sought for was specific performance in respect of the suit schedule property and those applications are pending, no stay was granted by the lower Court on execution side. After hearing the learned counsel on either side and on perusal of the material, it is seen that this Court has granted interim stay as long back as on 22-01-2009 and the same is still subsisting. In view of the same and especially when the main applications are still pending, it is not necessary to go into the merits of the case. It is suffice in the interest of justice to dispose of those applications. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, disposed of directing the lower Court to take up the applications filed to set aside the ex parte decree and to condone the delay in filing the application, and dispose of the same within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a coy of this order. It is also made clear that till the disposal of those applications, the interim order granted by this Court on 22-01-2009 shall continue to be in force. No order as to costs. _________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J Date: 16-12-2010 YCR