:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. SUIT NO. 3636 OF 1988 Dena Bank ..Plaintiff Vs. M/s. M. Kishinchand ..Defendant None for the plaintiff and defendant. CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date : December 11, 2008. Date : December 11, 2008. Date : December 11, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The Advocate appearing for the plaintiff - bank has been duly discharged. Notice was sent to the plaintiff - Dena Bank at the branch office so also at its Head Office, but it is reported that both the offices have been shifted. The plaintiff-bank had duly engaged the Advocate who, before obtaining discharge, had served a notice on the plaintiff-bank informing the plaintiff-bank that he is seeking discharge in the matter. This letter was received by the plaintiff-bank on 8/10/2008. Despite receipt of :2: the notice at the same address, it is now reported that the bank is shifted. The letters/notices which were sent by the hand delivery are also served in October and December, 2008. 2. Considering the fact that the Advocate has duly informed the bank that he is seeking discharge but the plaintiff - bank has not made any arrangement for its appearance, the suit is dismissed for want of prosecution. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.) (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.) (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.)