1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7882 OF 2009 Setu Madhav s/o Bhagwatprasad Pitti Petitioner Versus Pannalal s/o Shivratan Bagdia & another Respondents Mrs.A.N.Ansari, advocate for petitioner. Mr.A.S.Deshpande, advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr.Suresh Kulkarni, advocate holding for Mr.H.K.Mundhe, advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 26th April, 2010. PER COURT : 1 On perusal of the reply filed by Respondents, contentions raised by petitioner, in the petition, do not appear to be sustainable. No case is made out for causing interference in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition is devoid of substance. 2 Writ Petition, therefore, stands dismissed. ( R. M. BORDE) JUDGE adb/wp788209