IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9399 of 2008 1. VISHWANATH PODDAR, SON OF LATE BAIJNATH PODDAR, RESIDENT OF 4-B/S, MAYUR APARTMENT 3A, LOUDON STREET, KOLKATA – 700 007 (WEST BENGAL). 2. UMAPATI PODDAR, SON OF LATE BAIJNATH PODDAR, RESIDENT OF NAYA BAZAR, P.S. LAKHISARAI, DISTRICT LAKHISARAI. --- PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. KISHORE PRASAD, SON OF MAUZI SAO, RESIDENT OF PUNJABI MOHALLA, LAKHISARAI, P.S. LAKHISARAI, DISTRICT LAKHISARAI. --- OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 4 23.3.2010 Heard the parties. Petitioners are directed to appear before the Fast Track Court No. II, Lakhisarai in Sessions Trial No. 774 of 1989 on 12.4.2010 and on their appearance on 12.4.2010, they shall pray for bail and the petitioners should be granted bail in view of the fact that the petitioners have not actually misused the privilege of bail. However, if the petitioners do not appear on 12.4.2010 or for that matter if the opposite party seeks time on 12.4.2010, the Court below will not grant time and proceed in the case by issuing non-bailable warrant of arrest against the petitioners and also impose heavy fine on the parties concerned if they do not comply with this order. Obviously when the petitioners appear on 12.4.2010 the Court below will grant maximum of two days each to hear the parties and thereafter fix a date for delivering the judgment. In case the Court finds it necessary or requires time for itself to pass the impugned judgment, the Court should pass its order stating so and ask the parties to appear on the next expected date. If any of the accused persons do not appear on the next expected date fixed by the Court below then the bail bond of those accused persons shall stand cancelled. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)