^^^-^r-^r ^m ^pf^;- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. N0..^7£6 72005 PETITIONER / ..**^-'' ^^ ^^ ^•^& ^/•y^y ^^y ^' >l'^ ^y RESPONDENTS Digree Lal Patel S/o. Late Shri Girdhari Patel Aged about 61 years, R/o. Village Panchayat Birkol Vikaskhand- Saraipali Tah. Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Social Welfare and Panchayat Department, D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Deputy Director of Panchayat Social Welfare and Panchayat Department, D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 3. 4. The Collector Mahasamund Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) Sub-Divisional officer Saraipali, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) Babulal Baraiha, Upsarpanch Kanwarpali^Gram Panchayat Birkol, Distt.Mahasamund (C.G.) 6. Sharad Patel, S/o. Unknown R/o.Gram Panchayat Birkol, Distt.Mahasamund (C.G.) 5. // 2 // WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ...l. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRrC PETITION N0.2766 OF 2005 Petitioner Digree La( Patel Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETJTION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- ShriGaytam Khetrapal,AdvocateforthepetJtioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel L^wyerfor theStete. Shri Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate for the responctents No. 5 & 6. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 28th day of August, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that with the passageoftime.thepetitipn has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for (^her side does ncrt controvert the above submission. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok