IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.787 of 2009 SMT. RAMJHARO DEVI … … Petitioner Versus SHAKUNTALA DEVI @ KISHORI DEVI & ORS. … … Opp. Parties For the petitioner: Shri Subdeep Das ----------- 2. 21.5.2009 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order passed on 4.4.2009 by which the learned Additional Munsif V, Buxar, has dismissed the prayer of the petitioner for amending the relief part of the plaint in respect of certain documents, if any, in possession of the defendants by declaring the same as forged and fabricated and not effective. The learned Additional Munsif has noticed the statements in paragraph 13 of the plaint which could be relevant for seeking amendment in the relief part of the plaint. I find that in view of the allegations of fact and statement made in the plaint by the petitioner in paragraph 13 which appears noticed by the court below, the amendment in the relief could not be said to be unnecessary or to delay in disposal of the 2 suit. In the light of the above, I direct the court below to allow the petitioner to incorporate necessary amendment as sought by her by her petition dated 17.11.2008 filed before him. The petition is accordingly allowed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)