IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 137 OF 2006 SHRI SALVADOR I. FURTADO AND 4 ....Petitioners ORS., Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH ITS CHIEF ....Respondents SECRETARY AND ANR., Mr.D. Pangam, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S.S. Kantak with Mr. M.D.Salkar, Aga for the Respondents. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 24th April, 2006 P.C.: Heard Mr. Pangam, learned Counsel for the Petitioners and Mr. Kantak, learned Advocate General for the Respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioners who are serving as Head Constables (Executive) in the Office of the Respondent No.2, is that there is an anomaly in the pay scale of the petitioners vis-a-vis the pay scales of Police Constables (Drivers) serving with Respondent No.2. Regarding this anamoly the petitioners made representations to the Office of the Respondent No.2 and by communication dated 7.02.2006, the Superintendent of Police (HQ), Panaji informed the petitioner No.1 that the proposal had been forwarded to Government vide No.E-I/3278/2000 dated 15.05.2000. The learned Advocate General has made a statement that the said proposal shall be considered by the Government within a period of three months from today. 3. In view of the statement made by the learned Advocate General, nothing survives in the petition. The respondent No.1 shall take final decision on the said proposal, within a period of three months from today and shall thereafter communicate the same to the petitioners. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. A. P. LAVANDE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. sl.