1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6990/2004 IN F.A. NO. 388/1991 _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office } Memoranda of Coram, } Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's } orders or directions } and Registrar's orders } ___________________________}___________________________________ Mr. S.V. Kulkarni, Advocate for applicants. Mr. D.S. Kulkarni, h/f Mr. S.L. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent no.3. .......................... [CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J ] DATE : 24th FEBRUARY, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Heard Mr. S.V. Kulkarni. 2 The appellant did not take step for respondents no. 1 and 2 as per report dated 11/09/1996, as they are not residing at the given address. The matter was thereafter, notified on board to take steps on 20-10/2001, still the appellants / counsel did not take step. The learned Additional Registrar consequently on 20/11/2002 directed 2 dismissal of the appeal as against respondents no.1 and 2 for want of the prosecution. Now, recalling of the said order is sought. There is no explanation as to inordinate delay even after 20/11/2002 till making the application in the year 2004. The laxity on the part of applicants, can not be condoned. Want of court fee may not be a ground to address. Delay is not sufficiently explained. The application is dismissed. [ K.U. CHANDIWAL, J ] tsk/ca6990/2004