IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.116 of 2004 DILIP KUMAR . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 3/ 18/03/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that the advertisement stipulated the minimum height of 165 c.m’s. for appointment on the post of Constable in the reserved category to which the petitioner belongs. The contention is that the petitioner fulfilled the minimum requirement of height to be considered for appointment on the post of Constable. He questions his non-selection when he is admittedly found to have a height of 177 c.m’s. Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents that the minimum height on which appointment has been made is 179.1 c.m’s. Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to demonstrate any discrimination where a person below 179.1 c.m’s. may have been appointed in terms of the original advertisement which naturally stood varied uniformly and across the Board which cannot be classified as arbitrary causing discrimination to the petitioner. There is no merit in the writ application. It is accordingly dismissed. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)