IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5469 OF 2009 Between : 1. M/s A.R.Constructions (Anjireddy Constructions) Tadepalli, rep.by its General Manager. 2. Y.V.Ramakrishna ...PETITIONERS A N D Mrs. Josephine Manely …RESPONDENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5469 OF 2009 O R D E R: This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order, dated 06.11.2009 in I.A. No.1415 of 2009 in O.S.No. 378 of 2009, on the file of the III Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, whereunder and whereby, the application filed to direct the tenants to deposit arrears of rents and to deposit future rents pending disposal of the suit, was allowed. 2. The learned counsel for the revision petitioners/ tenants contended that the rent payable is only Rs.5000/- and Rs.1000/- is payable towards maintenance, and that the revision petitioners/tenants sent a demand draft for Rs.18,000/-, on 03.06.2009 towards rent @ Rs.5000/- per month and Rs.1000/- per month towards maintenance, for the period from March, 2009 to May, 2009, and therefore, they may be directed to deposit rent at the above rate. 3. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent / landlord contended that as per Ex.A1, the revision petitioners/tenants undertook to pay rent @ Rs.12,000/- per month, and therefore, they are bound to pay the rent at the rate. Hence he prayed to dismiss the revision. 4. A reference was made with regard to the execution of Ex.A1-letter of undertaking given by the revision petitioners on 08.04.2009, wherein the revision petitioner No.1, categorically stated that the rent is payable @ Rs.12,000/- per month. Now the revision petitioners denied the signature in that document. That aspect of the case has to be decided in the suit itself, but till then the revision petitioners/tenants are bound to pay the rents as per the undertaking given by them. The trial court, after considering the material on record, rightly directed the revision petitioners/tenants to pay the rents as per Ex.A1 undertaking letter given by them. The order passed by the trial court does not suffer from any infirmities so as to call for interference by this court, and as there are no grounds to interfere with the same. 5. The arrears of rent if any, shall be deposited within a period of four months from today, and on such deposit the respondent / landlord is entitled to receive the same without furnishing any security. There shall be Interim suspension not to dispossess the revision petitioners subject to condition the petitioners depositing the monthly rent on or before 10th of every succeeding month. 6. With the above observation, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU. J MARCH 19, 2010. YVL