IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH AUGUST 2010 / 22ND SRAVANA 1932 RP.No. 455 of 2008(H) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.3436/2000 Dated 18/06/2007 ................................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): REPONDENTS 1 TO 3 & 5 IN THE O.P. ------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ADDL.SALES TAX OFFICER-II, AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX AND SALES TAX, IRINJALAKUDA. 3. THE APPELLATE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, AGRICULTURAL INCME TAX AND SALES TAX, THRISSUR. 4. THE DEPUTY THAHSILDAR (R.R.) KODUNGALLUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. P.K.BABU RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. M/S. KEY CEE DISTELLERIES, CHENGALOOR, PUDUKKAD, THIRSSUR DISTRICT, A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, K.C. PREMAN. 2. THE KERALA STATE BEVERAGES(MANUFACTURING AND MARKETING) CORPORATION LIMITED, SASTHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/08/2010, HE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sou. M.N. KRISHNAN & K.T. SANKARAN, JJ ------------------------------------------------- R.P.No.455 OF 2008 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of August, 2010 O R D E R K.T. SANKARAN, J The respondents in O.P.3436/2000 are the review petitioners. The writ petition was disposed of following judgment in WPC.30672/2003. It is submitted by learned Government Pleader that after the writ petition was disposed of, and before filing the review petition, Writ Appeal No.1499/2007 was filed against judgment in WPC.30672/03. 2. Writ appeal No.1499/2007 was subsequently dismissed by judgment dated 22.1.2010 confirming the judgment in WPC.30672/2003. 3. It is submitted by Government Pleader that against the judgment in Writ Appeal No.1499/07, State has filed a SLP before the Supreme Court. 4. In the facts and circumstances mentioned above and in R.P. No.455/08 2 the light of the judgment in Writ Appeal No.1499/07, this review petition fails. The Review Petition is accordingly dismissed. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE. Sou.