1 APP 264 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.264 OF 2010 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.858 OF 2009 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1493 OF 2010 IN APPEAL NO.264 OF 2010 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.858 OF 2009 Mohammed Akbar Abdul ..... Appellant V/s. M/s.Crystal Developers ..... Respondent Mr.Rajeev Narula i/by Jhangiani Narula and Associates, for the appellant. Mr.S.U.Kamdar, Senior Advocate a/w Mr.D.V.Devkar and Mr.Pinakin Modi i/by M/s.Parimal K. Shroff & Co., for the respndent. CORAM :P.B.MAJMUDAR & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 14TH SEPTEMBER, 2010 P.C. 1. Admit. 2. The learned Senior Advocate Mr.Kamdar waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent. 3. With the consent of the parties, the appeal is taken up for final hearing at the admission stage itself. The learned counsel appearing for both the sides requested that this appeal may be disposed of without giving any reasons and that the injunction order granted by the learned Single Judge may be continued for a period of 12 weeks, with a liberty to 2 APP 264 of 2010 the respondent to apply for a fresh injunction before the learned Arbitrator. 4. Since a request is made on behalf of both the learned counsel that this Court may not give any reasons, we are not giving any reasons in the order. It is hereby ordered that the injunction granted by the learned Single Judge shall continue to operate for a period of 12 weeks from today. The respondent may prefer appropriate application for interim order or for continuation of the injunction granted by the learned Single Judge before the Arbitrator. If any such application is made before the Arbitrator, the same shall be decided on its own merits and in accordance with law and after hearing both the sides. It is clarified that we have not expressed any opinion on any of the issues raised in this appeal and the contentions of both the sides are expressly kept open. The Arbitrator can take decision for interim relief after hearing both the sides without being influenced by the observations made by the learned Single Judge. 5. In view of what is stated above, the appeal is disposed of. 6. In view of the disposal of the appeal, the notice of motion does not survive and the same is accordingly disposed of. ( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )