: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.33 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.33 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.33 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.89 OF 2006 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.89 OF 2006 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.89 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant. V/s. Satpal Bhagwat Tagad ...Respondent. Ms.R.M.Gadhvi, the APP for the Applicant/State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 20th February, 2007. DATE : 20th February, 2007. DATE : 20th February, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Ms.Gadhvi, the learned APP for the State. She makes a statement that the accused is already acquitted after trial by the Sessions Court. Therefore, the revision application as also the application for condonation of delay do not survive. 2. In the result, Criminal Application No.33 of 2006 and Criminal Revision Application No.89 of 2006 stand disposed off as infructuous. (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.)