cr no.7159 of 2009.doc - 1 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR No.7159 of 2009 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 04.12.2009 **** Partap Singh . . . . Petitioner (LR of deceased Smt. Gurdeep Kaur) VS. Raj Kumar . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. S.L. Chander Shekar, Advocate for the petitioner **** SURYA KANT J.(ORAL) (1). This revision petition is directed by the Judgement Debtor against the order dated 21.10.2009 passed by the Executing Court, Amritsar, whereby the draft Sale-Deed has been approved and the Local Commissioner has been appointed to get the Sale-Deed executed. (2). The petitioner is said to be the brother of the judgement debtor and claims to be in possession of the suit property and further asserts that he ought to have been heard by the Executing Court before approving the Sale-Deed. (3). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and after going through the record, I do not find any merit in this revision petition. cr no.7159 of 2009.doc - 2 - (4). The draft Sale-Deed has been approved in furtherance of the judgement dated 18.02.1999 which has already attained finality. If the petitioner has any objection against the description of the property nothing precludes him to approach the Executing Court. (5). With these observations and liberty, the revision petition is dismissed. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 04.12.2009 vishal shonkar