IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. RFA No.338 of 2005. Judgment Reserved on: 27.04.2010. Date of decision: 05.05.2010. State of H.P. & Others ……Appellants Versus Bal Kishan & Others … …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Appellants: Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General. For the Respondents: Mr.Ramakant Sharma and Ms.Devyani Sharma, Advocates. Dev Darshan Sud, J. This appeal arises out of a same Notification which was subject matter of decision in RFA No.318 of 2003, titled: State of Himachal Pradesh and Others vs. Shri Sachida Nand and Another, decided on April 6, 2010 alongwith other connected appeals. The purpose of acquisition is also the same and the same rate has been awarded by the learned Reference Court. This appeal is accordingly dismissed. It is directed that it shall abide by the decision in RFA No.318 of 2003 supra. 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers are allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 CMP No.714 of 2005 The same sale deeds, which were subject matter of additional evidence in RFA No.318 of 2003 and connected matters, have been sought to be proved in this appeal. This application is accordingly dismissed. May 5, 2010. (Dev Darshan Sud) (aks) Judge.