IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P.No.19014 of 2010 Date of Decision : 2.12.2010 Ram Niwas ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.S.P.Chahar, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The petitioner has impugned the election of Panch. He contends that the votes have erroneously been counted and as a result thereof instead of him respondent No.7 has been declared to be elected. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is misconceived, as the petitioner has an alternate remedy of challenging the election in an election petition. Consequently the petition is dismissed. The petitioner, if so advised, may take recourse to the legal remedy available to him. 2.12.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss