1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Third Bail Application No. 10349/2010 Ashok Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 26.11.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Naseemuddin Quazi - for the petitioner Mr NR Saran, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel submits that petitioner is behind bars since long and as our country has reformative theory, one should be given chance to improve his behaviour and conduct. Hence, petitioner may be released on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. I have considered rival submissions of learned counsel for parties. There is no dispute that our country has good system which includes reformative theory also but the case in hand is classical one. Petitioner was granted bail in thirteen cases on different occasions and the result is that he misused that liberty 2 one after another by commissioning other offence. Reformative theory is not for repetition of offence and crime as seen in this case. Looking to the aforesaid, without commenting on merits of the case but looking to pendency of thirteen other cases, petitioner is not entitled for benefit of bail. Hence, third bail application is dismissed. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma