Crl.M.No.M-20055 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-20055 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 20, 2010 Ram Parshad .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Anurag Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.279, dated 2.4.2010, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar, Hisar. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully. Brief allegations against petitioner-accused are that sale-deed regarding land of Dunger son of Parsa, who was already dead and having no LR, was forged in favour of co-accused Dharambir. The sale-deed was witnessed by present petitioner accused being Namberdar of the village and one Virender son of Dalip. FIR was lodged on the complaint of Sikander Singh, Naib Tehsildar. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is not the beneficiary of the sale-deed and that he has signed the sale-deed as a witness. Allegations against the petitioner-accused are serious in nature. He being Namberdar of the village connived with co-accused and got executed the sale-deed of land belonging to deceased Dunger, who died leaving behind no legal heir. Hence, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused. Crl.M.No.M-20055 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Ram Parshad for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 20.7.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge