IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2009 / 2ND MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 2469 of 2009(R) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- RT. REV. DR.K.P. KURUVILA, BISHOP AND CHAIRMAN, CSI DIOCESAN OFFICE, P.B N. 104, SHORNUR - 679 121. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.SAGEER RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. VILLAGE OFFICER, THALIKULAM, THRISSUR. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR. 3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, THRISSUR. 4. MAHBOOB, S/O. MUHAMMED, ARAVASSERIL (NMBIKADAVU) WARD NO. IX, THALIKULAM.P.O, THRISSUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C).No. 2469 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT Ext.P1 is a stop memo issued by the 1st respondent acting upon the directions issued by the 2nd respondent. Petitioner says that on receipt of Ext.P1, petitioner's association filed Ext.P3 before the 2nd respondent requesting him to withdraw Ext.P1 stop memo and permit them to go ahead with the filling up of the trench. Complaint of the petitioner is that despite having preferred Ext.P3, the 2nd respondent has not so far considered the same and that orders have not been passed. 2. Taking into account this grievance of the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of directing that, if Ext.P3 has been received and is pending, the 2nd respondent shall consider the same and take a final decision in this matter. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate,within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) ttb W.P.C.No. 2469 OF 2009 -:2:-