Criminal Misc. No. M-8976 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-8976 of 2008 Date of decision : 10.08.2010 Ajit Singh and another ....Petitioners V/s State of Haryana and another ....Respondents BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. S.S. Khurana, Advocate for respondent No. 2. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 19 dated 19.03.2008 in a case registered against the petitioners under Sections 448 & 453 IPC at Police Station Jatusana, District Rewari. The quashing has been sought on the ground that ingredients of offence under Sections 448 & 453 are not made out. This apart, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. Learned State counsel has, however, opposed the prayer for quashing of the FIR. He submits that investigation of the case has been completed and challan has already been presented before the competent court of jurisdiction. He further submits that in fact petitioners have wrongly stated before this court that the dispute pertains to agricultural land. In fact the same is a constructed residential house in which the complainant is residing. According to him, investigating agency has found the petitioner Criminal Misc. No. M-8976 of 2008 2 guilty. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant has opposed the prayer for quashing. He submits that FIR was lodged by the complainant due to criminal acts committed by the petitioner. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Only factual contentions have been raised in this petition for seeking quashing of the FIR. The same cannot be gone into in inherent jurisdiction of this court. The contention that ingredients of offence under Sections 448 & 453 IPC are not made out is also devoid of force. It appears that present petition was filed when the investigation of the case was still pending. Since then number of adjournments have been sought in this case. Meanwhile, the investigating agency completed its investigation and found the petitioner guilty. Under the circumstances, I am of the considered view that no ground for quashing of the FIR is made out in inherent jurisdiction of this court. The petition is devoid of merit and is hereby dismissed. August 10, 2010 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE