1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. O R D E R LRs of Bal Mukand Vs. State of Raj.& Ors. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4118/2005 Date of Order : : 24/09/2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr.R.S.Saluja, for the petitioner. Mr.Rameshwar Dave, Dy.Govt.Counsel for the respondents. BY THE COURT: By the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order Annexure-9 dated 29th June, 2005/1st July, 2005 whereby the representation filed by the petitioner came to be decided. However, challenge to the reversion of the petitioner, which was made in the year 1961, has not been considered on the ground that no such documents are available and the challenge has been made belatedly. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 Carefully gone through the order Annexure-9. It appears that earlier petitioner filed a writ petition before this Court being S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.908/2005 which came to be decided by order dated 14th February, 2005 directing the petitioner to make representation to the respondents and respondents were directed to decide the same. In pursuance thereto the petitioner made representation which came to be decided by Annexure-9. Except the relief with regard to the petitioner's reversion from the post of Surveyor in the year 1961 and consequence thereof for the fixation of the salary, the other reliefs prayed therein have been granted. Only grievance of the petitioner is that while deciding the representation by Anneuxre- 9, the legality and propriety of the reversion of the petitioner in the year 1961 from the post of Surveyor has not been considered correctly. In my view, the respondents were justified in not going back to the controversy as to whether the reversion of the petitioner from the post of Surveyor in the year 1961 was valid or not. Such challenge to the reversion was made belatedly. In this view of the matter, I find no merit in the writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. (H.R. PANWAR), J. NK