W.P. No.1631 OF 2010 : 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1631 OF 2010 Krishnat Shankar Arekar ... Petitioner V/s. Kolhapur Zilla Dekhrekh Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.P.D. Dalvi for Petitioner None for Respondents CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: JULY 13, 2010 P.C.: 1. The petitioner has approached this Court contending that the Labour Court as well as the Industrial Court in revision have erroneously dismissed his complaint. According to the petitioner, he was not given any opportunity to present his case before the enquiry officer and the findings of the enquiry officer are perverse. Both the Courts have found on the basis of the evidence before them that due opportunity was afforded to the petitioner to defend himself at the enquiry. Both the Courts below have concurrently held that the findings recorded by the enquiry officer are not perverse and have therefore, not granted any relief to the petitioner. 2. In my opinion, there is no need to differ with the view taken by both the Courts W.P. No.1631 OF 2010 : 2 : below. The petitioner has been dismissed for the misconduct of defalcation and misappropriation of certain amounts. In these circumstances, both the Courts have rightly held that the punishment of dismissal is not shockingly disproportionate. 3. Petition rejected.