R.S.A. No. 3747 of 2011 [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH R.S.A. No. 3747 of 2011 Date of Decision: November 11,2011 K.C.Aggarwal ...................................................Appellant versus Punjab State Electricity Board and others .... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri Present: Mr. H.S.Dhindsa, Advocate for the appellant. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment and decree dated 3.10.2009 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Bathinda, as well as the judgment and decree dated 31.5.2011 passed by the additional District Judge , Bathinda, whereby punishment of stoppage of two increments with future effect and also treating the suspension period as non duty period imposed upon the appellant by the punishing authority has been confirmed. The impugned punishment orders have been passed by giving show cause notice and due inquiry. There R.S.A. No. 3747 of 2011 [ 2 ] is no infirmity in the procedure followed by the Punishing Authority. The finding recorded by the Punishing Authority is that the petitioner SDO is responsible for issuing permanent disconnection order at the first instance and thereafter he failed to get permanent disconnection order effected properly upto 30.5.1997. No rule has been cited to show that the appellant was not responsible for the said Act. No substantial question of law arises for consideration by this Court. Dismissed. ( RITU BAHRI ) 11.11.2011 JUDGE rupi