IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.1602 OF 200 CRI.APPLICATION NO.1602 OF 200 CRI.APPLICATION NO.1602 OF 2009 Kunvar Gangaprasad Shrivastav @ Babloo, .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra, .. Respondent. Mr Prashant Gurav, for the applicant. Mrs S.D.Shinde, APP, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 21/04/200 DATE : 21/04/200 DATE : 21/04/2009 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.238 of 2008 of Vikhroli police station. The said crime has been registered against the applicant for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 307,143, 144,147,148 and 149 of IPC. 3. It is the prosecution case that the present applicant and four others have allegedly assaulted Mohd.Usman Shaikh alias Gannu Bhai on 16.10.2008 at 11.30 p.m. Insofar as the present applicant is concerned, he allegedly hurled a piece of tile towards the victim. One Suresh Yadav assaulted the victim with a weapon like sword. Suresh Yadav has already been released on bail by this Court vide order dated 25.2.2009 in Criminal Application No.839 of 2009. In view thereof, Mr Gurav, learned counsel for the applicant, prayed for bail on parity. In my opinion, the role of Suresh Yadav was more severe than the present applicant and since Suresh Yadav has already been released on bail by this Court, the present applicant is also entitled for bail. Hence, I pass the following order. . The applicant is directed to be enlarged on bail in the sum of Rs.5,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount, subject to condition that he shall report to the concerned police station on first Saturday of every month between 10 am and 11 am till conclusion of the trial and he shall also attend the Sessions Case regularly. . While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. . The application is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)