1 04. 25.01.2019 Learned Additional Standing Counsel submits that the accused, who is opposite party in this case, having not present, should be noticed. Office note dtd.25.7.2002 reveals that notice to the sole opposite party has been issued but he did not prefer to appear. This being a case of revision initiated suo motu and accused was acquitted in the appellate court of the charge U/s.376 I.P.C., it is desirable to appoint an amicus curiae to make hearing on behalf of the accused – opposite party. Accordingly Advocate Mr. Sudipta Panda is engaged as Amicus Curiae to conduct the case on behalf of opposite party. Office is directed to supply the copy of the brief to Mr. Panda. List this case after one week. ………………………... Dr. A. K. Mishra, J. mkp SUO MOTU CRLREV No.1 of 2002