<^- 'w^—- IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. (S} N0. '2^&5 /2010 PETCTIONER IP" ^..--•y .^t^ ^^y ^yy ^ ..-••' .-!.>•" RESPON&ENTS : ^ .„,, \V.s^f9r ^.a^, :a, "u"',. /'! ' y i- : ::k.af.'V /-^ .^:; ^T'^-:":^-''.--!' *^ ' *s'%"' Wrt"!*''?" "'?' .^' 5 ^^ Ujit Ram Jahire, aged about 60 years, S/o Shri Chamru Jahire, Upper Djvision Teacher, Govemment Middle Schoot, Kartala Block Kartala, Distt. Korba (C.6.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh' Through Secretary, Trible Welfare Department b.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) 2. The Commissioner Trible Welfare Department Raipur (C.<&.) 3. Assistant Commissioner Tn'ble Welfare Department Korba (C.6.) 4. District Education Officer, Korba, District-Korba (C.6.) 5. Block Education Officer Kartala, District- Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETEnON UNbER ARTCCLE 226 OF THE CONSTETUION OF INDIA ^•^^s^.. :S!SSSS^i >:.;K^ ^y HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Sjngje Bench: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava. J. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRtT PETITION (S) N0.3789/2010 Ujit Ram Jahire Versus State of Chhattisgarh and Others WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA Present: - Shri K. S. Pawar, counsel for the petttioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State on advance copy. ORAL ORSXR (Passed on 26th July, 2010) The petitioner was initially appointed as Deputy Teacher in the year1975 in Basic Training Instttute on a fixed pay of Rs.100/-. After comptetion of probation period, he was granted regular pay scate. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to regutar pay scale with effect from the date of initiat appointment or after comptetion of probation period. 3. The issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A.No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yactu and 56 Others v. State ofM.P. & others), wherein it was hetd that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment. TTie matter was taken up to the Hon'bte Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scate from the date of initial appointment. %i8«|j i umane 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner (urther submits that this Court, while considering the same issue in Ram Kumar Sahu & others v. State Govt. of ChhaMsgarh & Another, W.P.(S).No.813 of 2007, by order dated 12/02/2007, has granted regular pay scate with effect from the date of initial appointment. 5. Learned counsel appearing fbr the respondents submitted that the case of the petitfoner, on a representation being made, would be considered and deckfed in accordance with law. 6. In view of above, this petition is finally disposed off with a direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the case of the petitioner, in accordance with law, subject to verification ofthe facts. No order as to costs. Sd-/ Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge tsnaainasa^ww^s" ^*^^"@&^!,ssS£^^^S:^pBia':^E^S»^^^S^a<S3r- •;;-&•s^S