Ifi^^ :l£-^V].J-v' v''''wy'f'' -<". A®' ^" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBILASPUR (CG) MISC. APPEAL N0An / 2006 APPELLANT TLAINTIFF RESPONDENT ^KEFENDANT ^Deepak Kumar Wadhawani aged about 29 years, S/o Shri Gyanchand , R/o Avanti Vihar, Raipur , Tah. 85 Distt. Raipur (CG) Vs ^-/Satyapal Sharma S/o Late. Shri Ganga Vishnu Sharma aged about 73 years, R/o New Shanti Nagar, Raipur , Tah. 8s Distt Raipui- (C.G.) MISC. APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43RULE 1.0F THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE 1908;5t- XI-HC-22 "s^g-'^raRpT, (jiilti'iS, laxrii^y \'^ til^WT giflraf .h..!.A.C 'a^ 2Wla snin^i 'R'ira'3ii^i iiniRT^rea sn^i'TOiiwslta ^N?i'ft;T 'wcRff ^ 'fsret tN^re ^siPan aii^i 08.03.2006 Shri Sachin Sinqh Ra Hecrd on admission ar jiut, counsel for the appelldnt. d M.(C.)P.No.354/2006 for stay. for spec[fic performance of a contra< Appellant fi'ed a sui-} al'eainci that "esoondent en+e"ed into an aqreement on 18.05.2005 to ;el! his immovab'e propert/' e. iand and buildinq situated at Raipur for o. consideration of Rs.28,(y.OOO/- (Rupees tvifentv' eight !acs) 'ecesved earnesT monev tho.usandl. He clso filed ari of the CPC for araRt of inte S'f^^y^ffl!^ .tw*-l&-l^,3 E 5- fter evaluatinQ the niateria! on record held that DrinciDal of baiance of\ yi'irsi-iL find fayour of the appella' 19.01.2006, dismissed the a: Frerrs perusa! of 0,3re sale deed was to be ex.ecul in his own name o" in the possession of the same. . Court, T am of the opinion loss does.not flnd fayour o1 |of Rs.1,10,000/-. (Rupees one lac ten bDolication under Order XXXIX P.ule 1 & 2 'im iniunctson. i^l^ i, convenience anfl irreparabie ioss aoes nor it, therefore, vide irr'ipugned order'dated ^piication. • . ^ w.ent to sale i+ is e'/ident that registered bd under the direction of aDDel'ant either' iame of others and for whoie or in parts. Admitted'y. the house arid land belong to reseondent who . is in r'nerefor'e. takind into consideration the nctuce of the document c)nci var'ious reasons assigned by 'the trial nat balance of conveniencs-and irr'eoaro.bie r"^"'""-T""~r~" T^tRa^ •^^•'•••.'ssife'SiSa^ft.^S-.i!^'"?;f"?""w1' f-: -yT Uir^ ^. Y^l-tlt—-Z^ -s^ -^MMV, ^T8Tis,'i«T?ray .^..A.:....2:.°!..h. 3i^?[W •f^iqiSig^ gsra-'grsg siRn wnw 'sfeg 'EFRi^T: DLicjmci -•z f-ESfeistifsre^rt "sn^i n the result, The appeai is li is dismissed in iimine. • • Accorciingly, AA.(C.)P.No.354'2006 stands disposed of. However, tnking into considera'tion ti^enature of the dispute.thetria' Court is directed to expedit® tl Drefe"ab!v within one year f-rom todiy bie to be dismissed'sumtncrily and e disposal of the case eariy, ^ Sd/- y.K.Shrivastava Judge B