1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.404 OF 2009 Shrirang Pandurang Gaikwad .... Appellants (deceased) thru LRs Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents Mr.R.S. Kate, Advocate for appellants. Coram : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. Date : 18th November, 2009 P.C. 1. By this appeal, the appellants challenge correctness and legality of the judgment and order dated 26th June 2009, by which the District Court, Baramati, District Pune confirmed the judgment and decree of dismissal of the suit by the trial Court. 2. The appellants filed a suit for declaration of preferential rights to cultivate the alluvial land purchased by him from respondent no.6 and for permanent injunction to restrain the respondents by evicting him from the suit property or from prohibiting respondents no.1 to 5 who are State of Maharashtra and its officials from entering into an agreement for cultivation of the suit land with respondent no.6. The trial Court dismissed the suit holding that the appellants failed to prove their preferential rights over the suit land. The appellants also failed to establish that the notice dated 9th May 2001 issued by respondents no.2 to 4 2 for eviction is illegal. The appeal Court confirmed the decision of the trial Court. In view of the concurrent findings of the courts below, on the question of facts, being supported by the material produced before the Court, there can be no interference with the same. There is also no substantial question of law arising in the proceedings for consideration of this Court. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed in limine. (SMT.R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J)