-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1199 OF 2005 Bharat M. Yadav. .. .. Petitioner v/s. Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & anr. .. .. .. Respondents Mr.Santosh Shetty i/by Mr.M.P.Vashi for petitioner. Ms.A.K.Savla for respondents. ---- CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & S.C.DHARMADHKARI, JJ. S.C.DHARMADHKARI, JJ. S.C.DHARMADHKARI, JJ. DATE : 29TH APRIL 2005 DATE : 29TH APRIL 2005 DATE : 29TH APRIL 2005 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard Mr.Shetty in support of this petition. Ms.Savla appears for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has been given a stop work notice by the Municipal Corporation. The petitioner has also filed a reply. He has stopped the work. He should wait for their decision. If finally aggrieved he may take the necessary steps. No reason to interfere. The petition is rejected. 3. The respondents will take decision on the reply filed by the petitioner within two weeks hereafter. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) -2- (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)