IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 22ND MAY 2008 / 1ST JYAISHTA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 593 of 2008(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.26215/2001 Dated 06/02/2007 .................... PETITIONER : ----------------- T. JOHN ROSE, PROPRIETOR M/S.SRI. BALAJI AGENCIES, 36/2247 SANKOORIKAL BUILDINGS, OPP. KALOOR BUS STAND KOCHI-17. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- SRI. KAMARUDDIN, AGED AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIOSNER (ASSMT.) SALES TAX OFFICE, SPECIAL CIRCLE-I, ERNAKULAM COCHIN-682 018. BY G.P. SRI. TEKCHAND THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------- Cont. Case (C) NO. 593 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of May, 2008 JUDGMENT Even though counsel for the contempt petitioner submitted that the order passed pursuant to the judgment is not correct there is no scope for entertaining the contempt petition because the order, whether right of wrong, is already passed pursuant to the judgment. Contempt Case is therefore closed leaving freedom to the contempt petitioner to challenge the order. (C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge kk 2