IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.479 of 2011 In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 3878 of 2010 ============================================= Surendra Yadav .... .... Appellant/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ============================================= Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Jagnnath Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Jayshankar Vernwal Sc1 ============================================= 2 15-07-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The final order passed in the writ petition contained in annexure-2 dated 6.7.2006 does not show that there was any representation on behalf of the State that Rs. 53,210/- has been paid by way of “compensation”. Instead, the order shows that taking a compassionate view, the petitioner has been paid Rs. 53,210/- by the Government. The fact appears to be that even after the accident, by giving light duty as Home-guard, the petitioner was paid Rs. 53,460/- as explained on behalf of the State and noted in paragraph -9 of judgment under appeal. Learned Single Judge has considered the relevant materials and has held that there is no occasion to initiate proceeding of contempt against the opposite parties. We do not see any reason to take a different view. The appeal is dismissed. Mahesh Kumar Choudhary/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J) (Shivaji Pandey, J)