IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2598 of 2010 RAM ANUJ SAW Versus SYNDICATE BANK & ORS ----------- 2 15.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. On earlier visit to this High Court by the petitioner he got certain observation which is reflected in the order dated 5.8.2009 contained in annexure-6. Petitioner approached the Bank with his offer and the Bank has responded vide their communication dated 4.9.2009 which is annexure-8 to the writ application. Petitioner has been given offer based on the prevalent guidelines of the Reserve Bank of India as well as the Bank, the reflection of which is in paragraph 2 of the said letter. It is for the petitioner now to either avail the facility and come within the parameter of the circular and sort out the dispute or else the law will take its own course. There is nothing in the writ application to interfere. This writ application is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)