IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13158 of 2011 GAJANAND SWAMI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the transporter is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 328, 379, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The F.I. R. has been lodged by the driver who was asked by the petitioner being transporter to reach the some consignment but on way the driver was given some intoxicant in tea and the truck was being taken away. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in transport business, the trucks and the driver are being hired and the accusation is not against the petitioner not being present at the place of occurrence when the truck was being taken away by the miscreants. The statement has been made in the petition that the petitioner is the Income Tax payee and has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on 2 bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Korha P.S. Case No. 211 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Katihar subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)