((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.89 OF 2006 IN GUARDIAN PETITION NO.92 OF 1995 Mrs.Jaiwantibai Shankar Chavan Deceased Petitioner versus Mrs.Sulabha Prakash Sawant Applicant Mr.D.D.Harer for petitioner. Mr.V.L.Indulkar, Accounts Officer present. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 14th March 2006 PC : 1. The applicant seeks liberty to carry out amendments to the Guardian Petition No.92 of 1995 by substituting her name in place of original petitioner. 2. Having perused the affidavit in support of this Chamber Summons and further perusing the order passed on 5th May 2000, in my view, no prejudice will be caused if in the title of the Guardian Petition, the name of applicant is ((-2-)) substituted. Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. 3. Further, when this matter was moved yesterday I had directed the applicants’ advocate to inform the Accounts Officer with regard to the request to withdraw the share of Priti Ramesh Chavan. Her brother Ritesh Chavan has already withdrawn his share upon attaining majority. In my view, interest of justice will be served if after the amendment is carried out by the applicant, even share of said Priti Ramesh Chavan is allowed to be withdrawn as she has attained majority on 22nd April 2005. 4. Accordingly, Chamber Summons is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). After amendment is carried out the share of Priti Ramesh Chavan be also paid over to her along with accrued interest. The applicant has no objection to the said share being withdrawn as she is the Aunt of said Priti Ramesh Chavan. Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order issued by the Registry. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)