IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 1017 of 2008 Arvind Chauhan S/o Sri Ram Dass …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ..…. Respondents Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent No.4. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case submitted the final report against the petitioner before the Circle Officer concerned 01/01/2009 and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit the same before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been made in para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 18.03.2009 shall remain operative till the submission of the final report before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 01.05.2009 Shiv 2