1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2948 OF 2006 Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi ... Petitioner Versus The Security Guards Board for Gr. Bombay and Ors. .. Respondents Mrs. Ranjana Todankar for Petitioner. Ms. Sonia Sunil for R. No. 3. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: DECEMBER 12, 2006 DATED: DECEMBER 12, 2006 DATED: DECEMBER 12, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Rule. Heard forthwith. . Considering the controversy and disposal of the similar petitions, petition is disposed of by issuing the following directions : (1) Respondent No. 1, if the security guards whose names are listed at Exh A. if applied for registration to complete the exercise of registration according to law within eight weeks from today or if not applied, within eight weeks from the date of such application. (2) In so far as Respondent No. 2 is concerned, if Respondent No. 2 is not registered employer and engages security guards, then to take steps which respondent No. 1 has to take. 2 . With the above observations, Petition disposed of. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)