IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.541 of 2007 Ram Sobhit Rai S/o Manak Rai resident of Village Dharampur Nistama P.S. Samastipur Dist. Samastipur Defendant no.6- Petitioner Versus 1. Smt.Renuka Sinha W/o Late Ram Bilas Mahto resident of Village Dharampur Nistama P.S. Samastipur Dist. Samastipur Plaintiff- Opposite Party no.1 2. Shambhu Rai S/o Late Ram Lakhan Rai 3. Smt Devki Devi 4. Baleshwar Rai 5. Shankar Rai 6. Upendra Rai resident of Village Dharampur Nistama P.S. and Dist. Samastipur Defendant 2nd Party- Opposite Parties 7. Uday Shankar Singh son of late Umashankar Singh resident of Mohalla Kshipur Town. P.S. and Dist. Samastipur Defendant 3rd Party- Opposite Party ----------- 02 10.09.2009 No one appears for the petitioner. 2. This civil revision has been filed by defendant no.6- petitioner challenging order dated 19.12.2006 by which learned Munsif II, Samastipur allowed the application of the plaintiff-opposite party no.1 for amendment of her plaint filed in Title Suit no. 58 of 2004. 3. The aforesaid suit was filed by plaintiff-opposite party no.1 for declaration of her title and for other ancillary reliefs. In the said suit defendants appeared and contested. 4. It transpires that subsequently on 11.09.2006 plaintiff- opposite party no.1 filed an application for amendment of her plaint. The said application has been allowed by the learned court below vide its order dated 19.12.2006 which is under challenge in the instant civil revision. - 2 - 5. Law is well settled in this regard that the amendment of the pleadings does not mean that the said claim has been allowed by the court rather pleadings including amended pleading has to be considered at the time of final disposal of the suit on the basis of evidence on record and the principle of law applicable thereto. The court below has considered the matter and came to the conclusion that if the amendment is allowed neither nature of the suit would change nor there would be any adverse effect. 6. In the said facts and circumstances, this Court does not find any illegality or jurisdictional error in the impugned order of the learned court below. Accordingly, this civil revision is dismissed. shahid (S.N.Hussain, J)