c CV\OL" .C-)L A-;- IN THE HIQH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONERS .M )^A//^ ^y ^ ^^ ^ ^" ^'^<.° ^ ^ / -^' RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITICN NO.!4S2^/2Q05 (1) Etwar Ram son of Shri Deva &am, aged 35 years, resident of village Vithikala, Tahsil Ambikapur, Police- Station Ambikapur, District Sargujay (Chhattisgarh) (2) Jageshawar Ram son of Hakurla^ aged- 38 yearsy resident of village Jamhore Post Office Durgapur, Tahsil Kusmi, District Sarguja (Chhattisgarh) (3) SukhLal son of Chandan Ram, aged 35 years, resident of village Padkipara^ Tahsil Surajpur^ District Sarguja, (Chhattisgarh) (4) Vijai Shanker Sahu son of Chandrika- Sao^aged 38 years, resident Manipur, Ward Ambikapur, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Sarguja> (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS (1) State of Chhattisgarh through Secret- ary Men Power Planning Technical Education Department Chhattisgarh D«K*S» Bhaw '^ (2) Director Technical Education Cum ,JojLnt Secretary Technical Ediication Directorate Chhattis- garh Baren Bazar Raipiir* ? ' • . (3) Additlon-pl Director Technical Education Department of Chhatti- sgarh Baren Bazar Baipur^ ^ (4) Principal of Govt. Polytechnic College tobikapur, District ' Sarguja, (Chhattisgarh) K -^- WRIT PETITIOI^! UNDER ARTICAL 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE Qi? THE.. WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDj. -^:y—--^—^-^^ WJS CERTIORARI PROHIBITION Q FOR AlOTHER SUITABLE WRIT &;^ ^^--—-^ ^-"'"^' ^'"^s. y^^ ^r^'^ '^^.^^y ;^WRITS ORDEH/ORDERS DIBECTION/DIRECTIQNS* ^> y . X - ^ ?—..!1 HjGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARH:a "s^ PETITIONERS RiSPONDENTS WRIT PETITiON N0.1432 OF 2008 Etwar Ram & Ottiers Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constjtution of indja) Singie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AgnUiotri, J. Present:- Shri J.S. Baraik, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A;V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDERCORAD (Passed on this 9th day of Apri!. 2010) 1. 2. 3. 4. The petitioners were appointed pursuant to the sctwme of speciat recruitment drive on 14-9-t998 (Annexure - P/1) on daily vrages basis. The petitioners preferred this petition seeking grant @f regular pay scate with effect from the date of their initiai appointment wth consequential benefits i.e. arrears, etc« There is no dispute that the petitioners were appointed on daily wages basis and subsequentjy by order dated 2-3-2006 (Annexure - R/1) the petitioners were granted reguiar pay scale with effect from the date oftheir snitial appointment !n view of foregoing, nothing survives m this petitlon for adjudic^tion and the same has become infructuous. Accordingly, the wnt petition Is dismissed as havsng foecome infructuous. Gowri Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge