IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.2128 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision :30.3.2010 Surkha Singh ....Petitioner Versus Manjit Kaur and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr. K.S.Chahal, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. C.M.No.8173-CII of 2010 Allowed as prayed for. C.R.No.2128 of 2010 The petitioner is aggrieved by the order by which the amendment of the plaint has been allowed in favour of the plaintiff- respondent. It is the case of the petitioner that the amendment has been sought belatedly and the same could not have been allowed as it changes the entire complexion of the suit. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have perused the material on record. Annexure P-1 is the plaint on the basis of which the respondent had approached the Court with a prayer for permanent C.R.No.2128 of 2010 (O&M) -2- injunction. He had described the suit property by giving the details of the same as reflected in the sale deed. The details are as per the revenue record and as contained in the sale deed dated 29.7.1980. By way of amendment he only wanted to describe the boundaries of the plot. Such an amendment which is in consonance with the earlier pleadings is merely clarificatory in nature and therefore the impugned order cannot be faulted with. No ground to interfere. Dismissed. 30.3.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss