IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.F.A. No. 451 of 2010 (O&M) Smt. Sushila Devi and others .... Appellants vs State of Haryana and others .... Respondents Coram : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. B. K. Bagri, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Rajesh Hooda, Advocate for Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Advocate, for the HSIIDC. RAJESH BINDAL, J The landowners have filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly the facts are that vide notification dated 12.9.1992 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') the State of Haryana acquired land in the revenue estate of villages Asalwas, Pathuhera, and Suthana, Tehsil Bawal, District Rewari for setting up of Industrial Growth Centre at Bawal by HSIIDC. The Land Acquisition Collector awarded compensation for the land of different villages at different rates. The reference filed by the landowners was allowed by the learned court below and they were awarded compensation @ ` 3,30,000/- per acre for all types of land upto the depth of 500 meter on both sides of NH No. 8 and State Highway No. 71 (Rewari-Bawal Road), and ` 2,00,000/- per acre for the the remaining land. Aggrieved against the award of learned Court below, the landowners are before this Court. Learned counsel for the parties submitted that the issues raised in the present appeal are squarely covered by judgment of this court in RFA No. 3323 of 2005 – Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation and another vs Gindori and others, decided on 23.8.2010. In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of in terms of aforesaid judgment. 11.11.2010. (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge