THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION Nos. 2333 & 2357 OF 2006 06-03-2006 Between: M/s.Annapurna Roller Flour Mill, Hyderabad, rep. by its Partner. ……Petitioner And Assistant Commissioner (CT), (LTU), Saroornagar Division, Hyderabad & another. …..Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION Nos. 2333 & 2357 OF 2006 COMMON ORDER : (Per Hon’ble Sri Bilal Nazki, J) Heard learned counsel for the parties. With their consent, the writ petitions are being disposed of at this stage. In both the cases, show cause notice has been issued by respondent No.2 and the matter was decided then by respondent No.1. According to the petitioner, respondent No.1 did not consider the objections raised by the petitioner. The order also do not disclose that the objections raised by the petitioner were considered by the 1st respondent. It also transpired during the hearing that there had been a transfer of the assessment within the same Division from C.T.O. to the Assistant Commissioner. In this view of the matter, we allow these writ petitions, quash the impugned notices and give liberty to respondent No.1 to issue fresh notices to the petitioner and dispose of the matter after hearing the petitioner. ________________ (BILAL NAZKI, J) 6th March 2006 __________________ (G.CHANDRAIAH, J) ajr