HIGH COURTOFCHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.PJSlNo. 6803 of 2006 Bisheshwar Ram Bhagal; (D.Ed.), scged about 41 years, son ofShri Ram Dhani Ram Bhagat, Assistant Teacher, Goverument Primary School Bislmupali, Vikash Khand Baramkela, District Raigarh (C.G.) Versus 1 State of Chliatdsgarh, Through: Secretaiy, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 The Dista-ict Education Officer, Raigarh (Chhattisgarhj Writ Petition under Artide 226 of the Constitution ofladlal RESPONDBNTS Shri A.N. Bhakta, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Aiay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer, for fbe State on advance oopy. PRAL ORDER (24.08.2007) SUiSIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard on admission. Learaed counsel for fhe petitiouer submits that the petitioner has passed D.Ed. exaiamadon on his own expenses, tfierefore, he is entitled to receive two advance increments according to cu-culars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also subnuts that in many identical matters, tfae petitions have been allowed m terms of the order passed m the case of raahwtwt Sumar Bhwaawfii Vs. Munfcipat ConMratton Ourfj and another 12006 OB SSPJR-CQ 96i. He submits that the case of tlie petitioner is squarely covered by the said Judgment. This legal position is not disputed by fhe leamed counsel for the State. However, he submits that the order may be passed in tenns ofthe said judgment, but it shaU be subjected to verification regarding petitioner's such qualification. W.P.(S) No. 6803 of 2006 Accordiagly, this writ petition is aflowed in terms of fhe order passed ia case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to verification of the facts as to whether the petitioner had acquired D.Ed. Examiaation Certificate on his own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whefher he has beeu paid two advance increaients or not. The petition stands faiaUy disposed of. No order as to costs. ,~ ~~~ Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vattt