1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO. 1843 OF 2009 Citicorp Finance (India) Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. M/s. Maya Constructions & Anr. ...Respondents. Ms. S.I. Joshi i/by M/s. S.I. Joshi & Co. for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 8TH FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C.- 1 Affidavit of service is filed. None appeared for the Respondents., 2 Considering the averments made and as there is no denial, this Court has already passed order on 18th December, 2009 and granted relief in terms of prayer clause (d). Now, the averments made remained uncontroverted and therefore, the case is made out by the Petitioner as contemplated under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Arbitration Act). Therefore, I am inclined to grant prayer clause (a-1) except the bracketed portion. 3 In view of this the Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a-i) and (d). 2 4 The liberty is granted to Respondents to settle the matter and/or to furnish the security of this amount. 5 The liberty is also granted to raise appropriate plea/defence before the Arbitral Tribunal. It is made clear that the Petitioner is required to pay the requisite charges of the Receiver, in accordance with law. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)