1 C.A.NO. 1191/2009. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1191 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO.25825 OF 2008 . Narayan S/o Piraji Gaware & others. ...Applicants. VERSUS Angad S/o Keshavrao Shinde & others. ...Respondents. ... Mr.Nilesh Bandale,Advocate h/f R.K.Ashtekar, Advocate for the applicants. Miss Rashmi Hardas, Advocate h/f Mr. C. R. Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.1. ... CORAM: A.V.NIRGUDE,J. Date : 11th September, 2009. COURT’S ORDER: 1. The application seeks condonation of delay of about 91 days. The only reason given by the appellants is that despite of knowledge of dismissal of their appeal they could not file the 2 C.A.NO. 1191/2009. present appeal because it took long time to arrange funds for filing of the appeal. The appellants, are members of one family. 2. Although the respondents opposed application by filing a say and although they said that the reason mentioned for the delay is not convincing, I am inclined to condone the delay so that parties can contest the litigation on merits. 3. The application is allowed subject to payment of costs of Rs.250/- (Rs.Two Hundred Fifty only) to be paid to the respondent No.1. (A.V.NIRGUDE,J.) lkp