IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 7TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 WP(C).No. 35135 of 2007(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ JUDE P.L., S/O. LATE LAWRENCE, RESIDING AT PANACKAL HOUSE, NEAR ILLICKAL JUNCTION, KUMBALANGHI P.O., KOCHI. BY ADV. SRI.S.VASUDEVAN SRI.C.K.RAJEEV (AROOR) RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. KUMBALANGHY PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KUMBALANGHI PANCHAYATH, KOCHI. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI. 3. ST.PETER'S CHURCH, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICAR, KUMBALANGHI P.O., KOCHI. BY G.P. SRI.K.J.MUHAMMED ANZAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 35135 of 2007 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of November , 2007 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner is that a building situated close to his residential building belonging to the 3rd respondent Church stands in a dangerous condition and that neither the first respondent Panchayat nor the 2nd respondent R.D.O. have taken any action in spite of Exts.P1 and P3 respectively submitted before them. 2. I do not propose to examine the genuineness of the above grievance. But, since Ext.P1 is pending before the Secretary of the Panchayat, it is appropriate that an early decision is taken on Ext.P1. The writ petition will stand disposed of in the following terms: The first respondent – Secretary of the Panchayat will take up Ext.P1, conduct necessary local inspection and issue notice to the 3rd respondent Church and take a correct decision on Ext.P1. Decision, as directed above, will be taken only after hearing the petitioner and the 3rd respondent Church. The decision shall be taken within three weeks of receiving a copy of this judgment. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. dpk