mm(m)' Wm gi 200 mafsasném siggle Bench; HonibieQ 'usi'ice Dhimndra Mishro (Mimn Amie 226 of ' Jawahir- Lal, years, Casfe Wadra‘fnagar Sfafe c Secrefur” Bhawan] Thé Sub Division V T‘rié $5a Wadmfn: A: «AAA VU. LUV? Mr. Rakesh Pandey, Advoca‘re' Mr. Aji‘t Singh, Panei Lawyer f‘ HeardA The pefifioner‘ has fiied fhe cusfody of his fwo fracfor's, whicH For-esf Crime No.3251/11 dafed 6.3.2 mweww/ $Wané¥r Pefi‘fioner Vs , Responden'rs 1. 4 A .l‘f. W.P. ici Nb.2468/2OG9 p: yo Learned counsel for the pe‘ti 308 by respondem‘ No.3. applied for inferim cusfady of The Compefenf Au‘i‘hori‘i‘y on 9.3.2008 bt He furfher submifs’fhaf ‘Hnis pe1'i’ri01 pe‘l'ifioner f0 file fresh appiicafion fhe Consfi‘tufion of India) 5/0 Ramfah'am, aged abouf 34 Gond: R/o Village Kaknesa, Tahsil _... h-.‘-_ AL£:-_.. c-.._-.‘. ST Kange UTTICEF, FOFE$T Eger‘, Dish~ic+ Surguja (C6) :or The pe‘fifio‘ner'. ar' The 51’a1'e. Jadrafnagar. Disfricf Surguja (C6) n e- _ .. Kmgz K / . -¥‘ ‘ nsfanf pefifion and prayed for im‘erim have been seized in connection wi‘ih ‘ioner submh‘s The? The pefi‘iioner had said vehicles before responden'r No.2— f he refused ‘l'o accep'i the application. i may be disposed of wi'l'h liber‘iy 1-0 The before respondenf No.2 for inferim , DIS‘l'ric'l‘ Surguja {CG) ‘1‘ Chha‘rlisgarh, fhrough fhe r Foresl Deparfment D.K.5. {aipur (C6) Divis‘iéhal Offiéer Forééi Sula "\ymgcéw Wm E1 . 200 mm (Wu) mmfaaww WW§WM FZK $ea‘mm‘ cusfodv of fhe said vehicies and in furn. respondem No2 be directed To decide 'H'Ie said aDIpIica‘i'ion wi‘rhin The specified period. On fhe o'i‘her hand. iearned counsei for- fhe En‘m‘e submifs The? he has no objecfion if fhe pefifion is disposed of in fhe aforesaid fer-ms. Having heard iearned cou sei for fhe parfies, having regard 1'0 The fads and circumsfances of fhe c e, fhis pe‘i‘ifion is disposed of wifh liber+y f0 fhe pe‘fifioner’ 1'0 file fresh Iicai'ion before respondenf No.2 for gran‘i' of inferim cusi‘ody af his fwo ve ciesseized in connec‘i'ion wi‘i‘h foresi‘ crime No. 3251/11 dafed 8.3.2008. such applica‘iion being made, respondeni No.2 is directed To consider anc decide ihe same expedifiausiy preferably wii‘hiri a period of one mon‘i'h fron the date of receipt of the application, in accordance with Iaw. Sd/- ; Dhirendra Mishrai ' Judge " Certified copy as Der rule:.