1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 910 OF 1999 Shri. Premchand Balkrishna Pandyaji and anr. ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharasthra and Ors. ...Respondents Dr. V.K. Chaudhary for Petitioner. Mr. C.R. Sonawane, A.G.P. for R. Nos. 1 to 3. Mrs. Poonam Bhosale for R. No.4. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & S.P. KUKDAY,JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 23, 2005 P.C. . By this petition, the petitioners have sought reliefs to quash and set aside the voter’s list purported to be prepared on the basis of nonest byelaws. It appears that the Government had issued dierctives to Respondent NO. 5 society by order dated 12.11.1990 under Section 14(2) of the M.C.S. Act. It appears that the amendment was carried out by the society and cosequently the Registrar by its order dated 1.6.1998 held that the amendments are not binding on the society and confirmed the order dated 12.11.1990. . Inspite of that voter’s list have been prepared as per byelaws before its amendment. That was the 2 grievance made by the Petitioner before this court. The Elections have since been held and considering that at the present petition as filed is really infructuous. Considering that amendments are now in force and necessarily voter’s list will have to be prepared in terms of the amendments which are in force. . If any member is aggrieved by the amendment, then any such member to independently challenge the said amendment which challenge is not before us presently in these two petitions. With above observations, both the Petitions stands stand disposed of. No order as to costs. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.)