1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.174 OF 2009 Ramchandra Devidasrao Deshmukh ..PETITIONER VERSUS Hon’ble S.C. Jameerji, Governor, M.S., Mumbai & anr. ..RESPONDENTS Petitioner in person; Mr N.B. Khandare, Govt. Pleader for respondents. CORAM: P.V. HARDAS AND R.K.DESHPANDE, JJ. (Date of reserving the order : 15th June, 2009 Date of pronouncing the order 16th June, 2009) ORDER: [PER P.V. HARDAS, J.] This petition impugns the Cabinet decision regarding bifurcation of the Revenue Division and creation of a new Revenue Division at Nanded. It appears that the petitioner had filed similar petitions earlier and this Court had in categorical terms, especially in order dated 10.11.2006 passed in Writ Petition No.6025 of 2006 had held that the 2 petitioner would have cause of action for filing a petition after the issuance of notification under section 4 (1) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. In that light of the matter, therefore, according to us the petition is premature. 2. We have heard the petitioner in person who has read the additional affidavit filed by him as well as the grounds raised in the petition. We are informed that similar petitions have been filed in this Court and are pending adjudication, though filed on different grounds challenging the said decision of the Government. The petitioner specifically requested that his petition should not be tagged along with those petitions and should be decided independently. In the light of the grounds which are raised in the petition, we find that the other petitions raise different grounds and, therefore, this petition can be conveniently decided and the decision of this petition would not affect the pending writ petitions. 3. As observed by us, this petition is premature and in the light of that we dismiss the petition summarily with no order as to costs. [ R.K. DESHPANDE, J ] [ P.V. HARDAS, J ] amj/wp174.09 3