IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20945 of 2011 Md. Arman, S/O-Md. Samsuddin Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 19.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report nor anything has been recovered from his conscious possession. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner has been remanded in this case from Bodh Gaya P.S. Case No. 18 of 2011 and except the aforesaid case as well as the present case, there is no any other criminal antecedent of the petitioner. It is also contended by him that learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Gaya has wrongly mentioned in his impugned order that the Investigating Officer has recorded the criminal antecedent of the petitioner at Para-27 of the case diary. It appears from perusal of the impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Gaya that except confessional statement as well as antecedent of the petitioner, there is nothing against him. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Bodh Gaya P.S. Case No. 219 of 2010. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)