IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 29TH JULY 2011 / 7TH SRAVANA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 5520 of 2011 CRIME NO.378 OF 2011 OF ANGAMALY POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM. PETITIONER : ACCUSED 2 ----------------------------- VIPINDAS M.P., S/O.PONNAPPU @ PONNAMBI, MANJANATTUSERYIL HOUSE, MULAVUKAD P.O., PONNARIMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.VARGHESE RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JAYASOORYA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------ Bail Appl. NO. 5520 OF 2011 A ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 29th day of July, 2011 O R D E R This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is accused No.2 in Crime No.378 of 2011 of Angamaly Police Station, Ernakulam District. 2. The offences alleged against the accused are under Sections 341, 307 and 120B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(a) of the Explosive Substances Act. 3. The prosecution case is that on 13.3.2011, the accused persons planted explosive substances near a chapel at Angamaly. The exclusive substances exploded causing injury to the de facto complainant. 4. The offence alleged against the accused is very grave in nature. In a case of this nature, the discretionary relief under Section BAIL APPL. NO.5520 OF 2011 :: 2 :: 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be granted. If anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner, it would adversely affect the proper and smooth investigation of the case. For the aforesaid reasons, the Bail Application is dismissed. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/