1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 7540 of 2011 alongwith CWP Nos. 8000, 8001, 8002, 8004, 8006, 8007, 8008 & 8009 of 2011. Decided on: 14th September, 2011. 1. CWP No. 7540 of 2011 Sanjeev Dharmani Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 2. CWP No. 8000 of 2011 Arvind Kumar & ors. Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 3. CWP No. 8001 of 2011 Poonam Gupta Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 4. CWP No. 8002 of 2011 Baldev & ors. Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 5. CWP No. 8004 of 2011 Uma Vati Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 6. CWP No. 8006 of 2011 Prem Lata Vs. State of H.P. & anr. 7. CWP No. 8007 of 2011 Kirti Sharma Vs. State of H.P. & anr. 8. CWP No. 8008 of 2011 Anita Kumari Vs. State of H.P. & anr. 9. CWP No. 8009 of 2011 Seema Rani Vs. State of H.P. & anr. 2 Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, Advocate in CWP No. 7540 of 2011. Mr. G.S. Rathore, Advocate in CWP No. 8000 of 2011. Mr. Rakesh Chandel, Advocate in CWP No. 8001 of 2011. M/s Vikram Thakur, Naveen Awasthi and Neeraj Sharma, Advocates in CWP No. 8002 of 2011. Ms. Kiran Lata Sharma, Advocate in CWP No. 8004 of 2011. Mr. Dinesh Bhanot, Advocate in CWP Nos. 8006, 8007, 8008 & 8009 of 2011. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) This issue pertaining to vacation salary to contract teachers is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court rendered in Baldev Singh and others versus State of H.P. and others, CWP No. 415 of 2000, decided on 1st September, 2008 and the judgment has become final. Therefore, these writ petitions 3 are disposed of directing the respondents to release eligible vacation salary, during the entire service period, to the petitioners in case the same has not been granted so far, within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition(s) and a copy of the judgment, referred to above by the petitioner(s). If the amounts are not disbursed as above, the petitioner(s) will be entitled to interest @ 10% and the officers responsible for the delay shall be personally liable for the same. 2. The pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 14th September, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (sck/hl) Judge.