1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6101 OF 2009 Ramkrishna S/o Kishanrao Atule .. Petitioner Versus Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, through its Chief Administrative Officer, Mumbai and others .. Respondents Shri D. M. Shinde, Advocate for the Petitioner. The Respondent No. 1 and 3 served. Shri D. P. Bakshi, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 15TH MARCH, 2010. ORAL ORDER [Per NARESH H. PATIL, J. ] : . Heard. 2. The petitioner had filed representation against his transfer 2 dated 23.10.2008. 3. We direct the respondent No. 1 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 27.11.2008 on its own merits after hearing the petitioner in person within six weeks from today. The decision shall be communicated to the petitioner soon thereafter. 4. In case the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed, the petitioner is entitled to resort to appropriate remedy available under the law. With these observations the writ petition is disposed of. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 submits that the petitioner shall remain present before the Superintending Engineer Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, Aurangabad at 11.00 a.m. on 25.03.2010. Authenticated be given to the learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] bsb/Mar.10