1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO.699 OF 2008 Martand Padmanand Naik (Naik Wada) .. Appellant (Original Defendant ) Versus Arun Damodar Patil ..Respondent Mr.G.V.Wani, Advocate for appellant Mr.N.N.Desale, Advocate holding for Mr.A.G.Talhar, Advocate for respondent (sole) CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATE : 8th July 2010 PER COURT 1. The second appeal is filed against concurrent findings of the Courts below that the respondent-plaintiff has proved his case about the default committed by the appellant in paying his professional fee. The respondent is an Architect and admittedly, he was engaged for providing designs etc. for a building that the appellant was constructing. The Courts below held that the amount due has not been paid by the appellant. 2. Having gone through the judgments of the Courts below, I find no error in appreciation of the case. No substantial question of law arises in this appeal. The appeal stands dismissed. ( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. ) (vvr/699.08sa) 2