6) ^ k IN THE HIGHCQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURICGJ MISC. APPEAL N0.1°^^ /2004 ^^ APPELLANTS PLAINTIFFS No. 1 to 6 1. FadalagedSOyears. / 2. /' 3. y4. RESPONDENTS DEFENDANTS < No. 1 to 3 / Patiram aged 75 years Jatiram aged 70 years. Baliram aged 65 years. 5. Harnarayan aged60 years. /' 6. Harbanshi lal aged 55 years. All are son of Shankar Lal Dewangan [Koshta] Cultivators R/o. Village Bhatgaon, Tah. Bhatgaon, Distt. Raipur. VERSUS Smt. Prabha Devi aged 70 ^ ^- 2. ^" ^ ^^°':^s^ ^^- ^<<^^ 3. ^' years wife of Shri Roop Singh Chauhan. Mus. Indira Kumari aged about 60 years, D/o Prem Bhuwan Pratap Singh. Both are R/o Village Bhatgaon, Tah. Bhatgaon, Distt. Raipur [C.G.] State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Raipur Distt. Raipur [C.G.] APPEAL U/0 43 RULE 1 Frl OF C.P.C. \^- Being aggrieved by the impugned order dated 13.08.04 passed by IImJ A.DJ. Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur [P.O. Shri M.S. Kerketta] in Civil Suit No. 3i:A/04 which isannexed herewith asAnnexureP-1. The appellants most humbly and respectfully beg to submit as under on the following facts and grounds:- ^1: 'K-SKt^S1*s^^=^ss.^S^yi^^=^ 'es'-sx^ss'fs'v.n-XiKiSs.i :~»?':sn55&K^3^:^3?^^-^'w~^';~''''' -HC—78 ,qT^i ^n t^it^^ "^^] ^^T^\ W^F •V - 4" "3"^? ';:riFTRTT, 'g^ftTPTS. f^nTrTK ,.'(VL^-..........l.0..2-J... ^m^T%^?^'r""^"--""-'"--'--"'----^200.U| wt?r^^ C^^r) ^mm ^fef ^N^ft^ ^m^f ^r fe^ Tfe^K '^5Tfro ^I^T S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice NIK. Aaarwal 29.10.2009 | Shri Ravish Verma, Ad^ocate for appellant. Ms. Preeti Chouhan, A|dvocate for respondent No. 2. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel Lawyer for State. »r ^-aKiL Learned counsel app^aring for the parties submits that since the main suit has ^ilready been decided on merits, therefore, this appeal has be^ome infructuous. Accordingly, the appejal is dismissed as having become jnfructuous. No order asto c^sts. Interim relief granted ^arlier stan^sjvacated. M(C)P No. 1439/04 also stands disposejd of. f j i _ SdA 1 j N. K. Agarwal i ^ Judge r.^