IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 8012 of 2008 Between: 1 Razia Sultana W/o.Md.Isa Neela(V) Renjal(M) Nizamabad Dist 2 Ahmed Khan S/o.Afjal Khan, Neela(V) Renjal(M) Nizamabad Dist 3 J.Shankar S/o.Rajaiah, DhupallyV) Renjal(M) Nizamabad Dist 4 D.Hanumanthu S/o.Gangaram KandakurthyV) Renjal(M) Nizamabad Dist ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Govt of A.P, rep.by its Commissioner of Civil Supplies and Ex-Officio Secretary to Govt of A.P,Hyd 2 The Dist Collector Nizamabad Nizamabad Dist 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer Bodhan Nizamabad Dist 4 The Tahsildar Renjal (M) Nizamabad Dist .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.V.RAVI KIRAN RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus to set aside proceedings dated 02-11-2007 issued by respondent No.4, whereby he submitted proposals to respondent No.2 to bifurcate the existing fair price shops in Renjal Mandal, Nizamabad District. Having heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and perused the record, I am of the view that this Writ Petition is premature. The proceedings issued by respondent No.4 are mere proposals given to respondent No.2 for bifurcation. The learned Counsel for the petitioners agreed that unless respondent No.2 approves those proposals, the existing fair price shops will not be bifurcated. If the petitioners have any legitimate grievance against the impugned proposals, they shall be free to approach respondent No.2 and point out the alleged illegalities therein and request him not to accept the same. In the event respondent No.2 passes an order adverse to their interests, the petitioners can avail the appropriate remedies available to them in law at that stage. Subject to the above observations, the Writ Petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.10558 of 2008 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is dismissed. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 15th April, 2008 Note: CC in three days. (B/o) lur