V V ¥ aW’QgQ 3gngh IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Cr M P No p7” 0F2010 PETITIONER ’ ACCUSED Roop Chand Parakh, S/o. Birdichand Parakh, aged about 47 years, Through $§\\G.w"" Prakash Kirana Stores, Sambalpur, R/o. .Village and ;§&-‘;‘“§wo'?f% pf?” Post .Sambalpur, Tahsil Bhanupratappur, District Kanker (C. G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT COMPLAINANT Jain Cycle Store, Dalli Rajhara, Through Proprietor Shri Gautam Chand Jain, S/o. late Shri Sultanmal Jain, aged about 49 years, R/o. at and post Dalli Rajhara, Tahsil Balod, District Durg (C.G.). /, PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF Cr. P. C. ¢ Cs‘wvx ~N>$30io ‘E 00 m SB : Haru’We $hri Maniniira fv‘iahan S . 254 1 £019 3hri Raft—lash Kumar Sharma comsei for the petiticiier. L_.- nu Hsi‘liSn A- L cutana, a EOU‘IEEF lbii me I‘éspOrldei’li. hé peuii’oiier in Lni$ peuiim is facing friai' on ihe compiaim 6f ihe resporuueni, uneer ceciioi‘: n‘ao on negoi'iabie ‘ii'mi‘uh'uem mu in vnn ._ A ., - The pe‘tiiioner-Roop Chand Pafann fiied an anpiic—atwn unner Se ma an —. Luna. m m g beuoré g the H magiSuaLe on n45/uwmw WW”, {i‘mi‘lexm‘é Fi4) wfxieii was rejected on in’t very 6a‘v‘ and baii banus were canwiiéa' anc§ tne Conn béio. i$$.éd non-baiia‘nie warrant. Aggi‘ieaved by the said cider, a revision petiiion was preferreci which has been CiisiniSSéoi vide order daréd SGJ‘WXEGW in criminai revision No.53u 'r‘:me peuuoner ._ _i.:z.‘ in thie 'peiiiio ras approacneu ihis Conn "by g riris ' rejection of his appiieaiien for exempucn from appearance ana revisionai Coun. Learned aounsei for the pe oner at the outset submitter} that i‘e is aonfining his appiiaation oniy in t matter or“ chaiienge to rejection of his are iication for grant of exemption om appearance hieo‘ under Section 3t? sutorriitteo‘ ov iearnerj counsei for the that the exemption w- sought on the ground of iitness of his angeume. Learned oounsei for me petitioner 09/zut6 a A; tne n ivragistrate rejecteu the appiioa ion for exemption of appearance on the ground that no medic-at certificate h s been produced and that the petitioner l"' 0‘1 - ‘Lh - u- .- -3:- i f‘ A 3n t v. L E an: No.15wu pending hefore ihe J.n‘v‘:.F.i’3., 33m Kaihra, Burg. - = J. s... ..,; A ‘ . . Mr. i. -4; peiiiicn under Seciien 482 CrPC, a grieveei :5 r sriissai *f his revision petition by ihe nephew who is undergoing treatr t regarding heart aiirnent at i n B init'- that vide order dated 25; [Hie W i J i‘ - "‘* c r r t i h u' 'b Wmmm K — 2? - v. /, / m pp Cone, ihe aetitior‘er iS entiiied i0 (me ’ai‘ry' doum s L in iLiorr Since icmg. Léarnea‘ coumei’ for u is; mt appearirlg before 'the Coui‘l peiithner argued that ihe non-appearance of the wazt; bar—laikie am‘ if the Court 'i'raa‘ ;:_ e pemianer cm 25i0§f2010 _ an; wiih regard i0 i'he aiimem of hi$ .‘__-_.1 z V u,_ n -, .4. A _.J.x Va .. E _.~.__ z- ;e J -u ‘ ..eximiu,__ ;.. .3". _'..._,. i.P_J: A- x Ceiiificates. He Submutteu L than a amaie wa am‘ ine ‘ pet§ii0r1er L vva$ feauy J Lo abiae t elore t‘r‘é th‘ Couri am‘ he may ba grameti Gina East opporiurxi‘ty to appeal Conuemed Cout‘i. Leamed counssei d i‘evisior: fiiaa‘, ‘me $a'me has been peutieher hae r10 x 1 of ieamee’ cou‘neei for/‘the feseondem Gr: ihe other hand, submiesio ,a‘tea y 2ei§u0l :— M ix a i3 reniectee E a thai me u : -J S ‘rro iniev‘xiiai’x i0 avoia‘ t‘né prOCéeciing$ we?! coridéiions as; mav be imposed my .. I I amat upo 3 iemieseci. as no‘t m iruiainahie. The eurt uy fiiieg ihie peiiiioh wider Seetiei‘x the peiiiiorler submii‘tea v- AL: w approac§ieci i§iiS 404 ma Clr'v. an: m /= men, ii caiiiiot ‘oe eaie‘ i0 be megai ru 0i miecarriage 0f jusiice $0 a$ i0 war aki‘eg i'ruto coneiaeratiea ihe f‘i’ ‘Lhe paii§e$ anu A. tnaL ‘,-_L the petitionei Ham ma” £ ‘H.‘ .. 4:)ib9muw Cm frxe gromié CI imIeSS treaiment far heart aiimeh‘x a; t ,—n'aag‘ me n of offerlae aiiegeé again u- - ui'e __._ “g fiue 01 me gfOim to submii ihe’ meaicai ceaificaie on Couii beiow was; ewa‘y‘eci uy ii'Ie fact ‘xL. reeuiting i'r: abuae the precess m «aw ._A 2-3. lIILenei‘eiiGe «J aOV ims s = nu ‘uii‘i. v submissians marie by iearhed couneei sought exempuoh from appearahce 0h hie heehew Who is eaia to he receiving rore’ arm g area a rug irrte co rieraheh -t me peiiiiorrer, ih the opihioh or : ‘ this. op'poriurrify. Moreover, if the Cour‘i has eiateo‘, ihe peuuoher couid be oiirecieczi ubseqLiem dares. ii appears mai the iha't ihe periiiorne“ has; not appeareo" on ‘f __ e;- u- ~ e -ms: ...__; _ [Hie W a e : a‘ m 7t r Ai mm ................. W ................................................ WWW : W m ............cwrawggboém W 2 ww iin€trm $Wm LZ-1‘‘.W,_ " \ I MIA) iu Witirloui faii. :Au = x$ made cieai .u- mat if mi 15m siiaii we aper: far ihe carlcer'neci Cm pass‘m‘tieis w uumpei appear-awe ofi . g Au: on préVieu$ daies,’ iioii-appéarame unuue Wéiahtage pariicuiarW'when i? grourncis geeking exém'otioii from app .unoer ._ E 1.“- mese circamstariea, th [ief’$ appiicatiot‘: under the ciates siruce 6mg. Once the peuuo'rler was, exempied fix): a Ms agpem‘ai‘ice on previou$ (fates cc‘ui‘a‘ noi he giver: [é pal ml er hau comé out‘Wun speéif‘ic arafWCé. order dared 25i0§i201 0‘ ‘io the extra-iii it Sectiorl 317 CrPC carmot be Sustaineci The petitioner Shaii how. anneal“ before the concerhed ii‘iai ‘5mn:nn;.-. Elm mmravine L petitioruer uoes rm appear, ii iri to take anpromiate pr’cceedh‘was anci m viéw on awve, the peii’iici‘n is ihe peuriorrei' irx accordancé ’wun iaw. .,: _:_, . -L- ..s ‘u; , .mn aiiowea‘ to ihé exfent indica‘iea‘ ahove. Sd/— Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [113%W