IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4162 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- C S GOHEL Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PM THAKKAR for Petitioners MR MUKESH PATEL for Respondent No. 1 MR DD VYAS for Respondent No. 3, 4 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA Date of decision: 22/03/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT #. Heard the learned counsel Ms.Sangita Pahva for learned counsel Mr.P.M.Thakkar for the petitioners, learned counsel Mr.Amit Bhatt for learned counsel Mr.D.D.Vyas, for respondent nos.3 and 4 and learned AGP Mr.Mukesh Patel for respondent nos.1 and 2. #. There is a consensus that the stay against the operation of order dated 5.5.1988 at Annexure-A to the petition has operated since 2.8.1988 at which time the proposal for the promotion of the petitioners was pending. Thereafter, there are no fresh instructions as regards the promotion or withholding of promotion of the petitioners. In this set of facts, the petition has become practically infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is disposed with a liberty to the petitioners to apply in case of necessity. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. ( D. H. WAGHELA, J. ) kks