IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 26525 of 2005 Between: Ch. Koteshwara Rao, S/o. Late Nageshwar Rao, R/o. Bodhan, Nizamabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Nizamabad District, Nizamabad. 2 Land Acquisition Officer, (Assistant Collector) Bodhan Nizamabad District. 3 A.P. Housing Board, Nizamabad Division, Nizamabad, Rep by its Regional Engineer. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. K.DEVENDER FOR MR.K.RAGHUVEER REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or Direction preferably a writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not depositing the decretal amount in E.P.No.54 of 1999 in O.P.No.23 of 1989 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Bodhan, as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and also violative of judgments of this Hon’ble Court and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith deposit the decretal amount.” Sri K.Devender, learned counsel representing Sri K.Raghuveer Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the statement of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.34105 of 2005 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NARAGJUNA REDDY, J 30th June, 2008. kvni