WP(C) 4569/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. J Abedin, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S harma, learned counsel for the respondent-Bank. The petitioner’s grievance is against the inaction on the part o f the respondent-Bank in releasing 50% of his arrear dues for the services rende red by him as a Supervisor thereof. Mr. Abedin has submitted that the issue of termination of the em ployees of the respondent-Bank has been adjudicated on their challenge initially by a Single Bench of this Court, which upheld their assailment directing releas e of 100% of the arrear back wages. This decision was upheld in the appeal file d by the respondent-Bank. Eventually, the Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 1836/2 007 by its order dated 05.04.2007 while sustaining the determinations made by th is Court directed the appellant-Bank to release 50% of the arrears back wages ke eping in view its frail financial health. Armed with the said order, the petiti oner has, meanwhile, submitted a representation before the Bank on 29.04.2008 cl aiming the same relief. As the representation remains unattended, he is before this Court. Mr. Abedin in course of his argument has also drawn the attentio n of this Court to the order dated 29.02.2008 passed in WP(C) No. 162/2008 direc ting release of 50% of the arrear of back wages of the petitioner therein. Acco rding to him, the present petitioners are similarly situated. He further submit s that for the present the petitioner’s grievance would be redressed if this pet ition is closed with a direction to the General Manager of the respondent-Bank t o consider and dispose of his representation on merit. Mr. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent-Bank has submitte d that in the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner’s claim is not sustainable in law. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in mind the litigational background of the case, this Court considers it appropria te to dispose of this petition, at this stage, with a direction to the aforement ioned authority of the respondent-Bank to take a decision on the petitioner’s re presentation dated 29.04.2008 on merits. As the petitioner waits in expectation, the exercise indicated h ereinabove should be completed within a period of 4 (four) weeks from the date o f receipt of the certified copy of this order.