1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5364 OF 2009 Ms. Renuka Punnappa Patil. ....Petitioner vs 1. The President, V.K. Chavan Patil Shikshan Sanstha, Kine & ors. ....Respondents Mr. V.S. Talkute for the Petitioner. Mr. S.S. Patwardhan for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. P.I. Khemani, AGP, for the Respondent No.3. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 19TH JANUARY, 2010. P.C. :- 1. It is not in the interest of the Petitioner to pursue this remedy. Apart from the question of limitation is the question of the entitlement to the reliefs claimed on the basis of the orders sought to be enforced. As fairly admitted by the Respondents, there would be no technical hurdle of limitation in the execution proceedings. Further, in the facts of this case, execution proceedings would be the appropriate 2 remedy. 2. In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is dismissed with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings. If the execution proceedings are adopted they shall be accorded priority on the basis that it was filed in the year 1998. 3. Writ Petition, accordingly, disposed of.