72# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 771/2011 PARDEEP CHADHA Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Bhatia, Advocate with Petitioner in person. versus STATE& ANR Respondents Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel with Mr. Laxmi Chauhan, Advocate with J.K. Prasad, PS Paschim Vihar. Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate for Respondent No. 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER I % 26.05.2011 Cri. M.A. No. 6360/2011 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P. (CrU No. 771/2011 By this petition the Petitionerwho is the brotherin law of Respondent No. 2 seeks quashing of FIR No. 46/2005 under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPG registered at PS Paschim Vihar, Delhi. The husband of the RespondentNo. 2 had expiredon 23''^ October, 2009 thus the Petitioner is now the only accused in the abovementioned ITR. The Complainant/RespondentNo. 2 Ms. Preeti Chadha is prescjntin person and is identified by her counsel. She states that she has settled the matter W.R(CRL)771/2011 Page 1 of 2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Signature Not Verified and in terms of the settlementshe has left with no claimstowardsthe family of the husband including the present Petitioner. She further states that in view of the settlementbetweenthe parties, she does not want to pursuethe abovementionedFIR and the proceedingspursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useftil purpose will be sei-vedin continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementionedFIR and the proceedings ^ pursuantthereto. Consequently, FIR No. 46/2005 under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPG registered at PS Paschim Vihar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. j ^ MUKTAGUPTA,J. MAY 26. 2011/'vvi' W.R(CRL) 771/2011 Page 2 of2