IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1441 of 2007 SUDHAKAR JHA SON OF SHRI INDRA KANT JHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE EKADH P.S. NAUHATTA, DISTRICT- SAHARSA AT PRESENT ISSER NURSING HOME, SAHARSA, P.S. AND DIST. SAHARSA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DINESH SAH SON OF RAM BAHADUR SAH. 3. PARMESHWAR SAH SON OF RAM BAHADUR SAH BOTH 2 AND 3 RESIDENTS OF GANDHI PATH, NEAR ISSER NURSING HOME, SAHARSA, P.S. AND DISTRICT- SAHARSA For the petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Mukund, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP For the O.Ps. : Mr. Nachiketa Jha, Advocate Mrs. Reebha Kumari, Advocate. ----------- 3 18.08.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner is informant of the Saharsa P.S. case no. 326 of 2005 which gave rise to Sessions Trial No. 106 of 2006 of the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge-cum-F.T.C. IV, Saharsa. He is aggrieved by the judgment and order of acquittal recorded by the learned trial court. I have perused the judgment. Paragraph nos. 16, 17, 18 and 19 record reasons for recording order of acquittal. It appears that the State also preferred Govt. Appeal (DB) no. 12 of 2008 (State of Bihar versus Dinesh Sah & Anr) which was also dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court on 6.5.2008, certified copy whereof has been produced by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties and the same is kept on record marked “X”. This Court does not find any patent illegality in the 2 judgment meriting interference. The application has no merit. It is accordingly dismissed. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )