WPSS No.516 of 2005 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Pankaj Purohit, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. The petitioner has challenged the suspension order. An interim order was passed staying his attachment order. The suspension order was allowed to continue. More than five years have elapsed and the disciplinary proceedings must have come to an end. The learned counsel for the parties are not aware of the exact status of the disciplinary proceedings. Considering the facts and circumstances that has been brought on record, I dispose of the writ petition directing the disciplinary authority to conclude the inquiry proceedings, if not already concluded, within six months from the from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 09.03.2010 Shiv