IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2422 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 2422 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 2422 OF 2005 Udaypratap Sudhai Singh ....Applicant. versus Indrabahur singh & ors...... Respondents. ..... Shri A.K.Singh & V.K.Singh for applicant -absent. Shri Y.S.Shinde APP for respdt. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM ; A.M. ; A.M. ; A.M. KHANWILKJAR, J. KHANWILKJAR, J. KHANWILKJAR, J. DATED; DATED; DATED; DECEMBER 20, DECEMBER 20, DECEMBER 20, 2005 2005 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. None appears for the applicant. Even in the past matter had gone by default as is seen from the record. 2. As alternative efficacious remedy is available to the applicants by way ofi revision before the Sessions Court in view of the decision of this Court in the case of V.K.Jain & Ors. Vs. Pratap V. Padode V.K.Jain & Ors. Vs. Pratap V. Padode V.K.Jain & Ors. Vs. Pratap V. Padode reported in 2005 2005 2005 (3) Mh.L.J. 778 (3) Mh.L.J. 778 (3) Mh.L.J. 778 and unreported decision of this court in Criminal W.P. No.1023 of 2005 dated 8th W.P. No.1023 of 2005 dated 8th W.P. No.1023 of 2005 dated 8th December December December 2005 2005 2005 in the case of Chetan R. Nagda & Ors. Chetan R. Nagda & Ors. Chetan R. Nagda & Ors. Vs. Vs. Vs. N.D.Pawar & anr., N.D.Pawar & anr., N.D.Pawar & anr., no interference is warranted. ....