HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA CRL.R.C.No.2039 of 2010 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is directed against the docket order dated 17.07.2010 passed in C.C.No.190 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kodangal, Mahabubnagar District, taking cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 448 and 324 read with Section 34 of I.P.C as against the petitioner-A1 herein. On a complaint given by the 2nd respondent herein, a case in Crime No.21 of 2010 was registered against the petitioner-A1 along with 6 other accused by the Sub Inspector of Police, Bomraspet Police Station, Mahabubnagar District, for the offences punishable under Sections 448 and 324 read with Section 34 of I.P.C. Eventually, after completion of investigation, the Sub Inspector of police, Bomraspet Police Station laid charge sheet against A-2 to A-7 only for the aforesaid offences in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kodangal. However, the learned Magistrate by the impugned order dated 17.07.2010, had taken cognizance of the said offences against all the accused including the petitioner herein. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner-A1 preferred this revision. Heard both sides and perused the impugned order. From a perusal of the charge sheet filed in C.C.No.190 of 2010, it is clear that A-2 to A-7 alone have committed the offences punishable under Section 448, 324 read with Section 34 of I.P.C. and that the offence as against the petitioner-A1 is not established as per the evidence of L.W.6-Mandal Education Officer, Bomraspet, who had stated that in pursuance of the instructions of the District Education Officer, Mahabubnagar, he had convened the teleconference meeting with all the Head Masters in Bomraspet Mandal on 6.3.2010 from 11.30 A.M. to 4 P.M. in which one G.Sayanna Goud, Head Master i.e., the petitioner herein has also participated and signed in the attendance register. Hence, this Court is of the view that the Court below ought not to have taken cognizance of the offences as against the petitioner-A1 herein who is not charge sheeted by the Investigating Officer. The Criminal Revision Case is accordingly allowed and the impugned order dated 17.7.2010 taking cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 448, 324 read with Section 34 of I.P.C against the petitioner-A1 in C.C.No.190 of 2010 is hereby set aside. _______________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 31.01.2011 Gsn.