1 CA No. 2198 of 2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2198 OF 2011 (Venkatrao Bhaurao Khandarkar died through his L.Rs & ors V. Sow. Sapna Ratolikar & ors) in FIRST APPEAL NO. 242 OF 2011 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr.Milind Patil, Advocate for the applicants Mr. V.D. Patnoorkar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 5 Mr. T.S. Lodhe , AGP for the respondents / State PER COURT : 1. Heard, learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. Shri Patnoorkar, learned Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 5 submit that in view of the fact that decree is passed in favour of the present respondents, the same may not be stayed. The decree is for partition and separate possession, necessarily implying that present appellants / applicants are in possession of the property. As the appeal is admitted said possession shall have to be protected. The clause Nos. 6,7 and 8 pertains to monetary part of the decree, as such the same need not be stayed. 3. In the light of above, I pass the following order. 2 CA No. 2198 of 2011 ORDER A] Impugned Judgment and Decree is stayed except clause Nos. 6,7 and 8 of the operative part of the Judgment. There shall not be any stay to the clause Nos. 6,7 & 8. B] Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. 9th Mar. 2011 ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ) SDM*2198.11CA/090311