IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.9914 of 2009 Munchun @ Sumit Kumar, son of Vivekanand Singh, resident of village- Lakhpar, P.S.- Naubatpur, District Patna. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR With Cr. Misc. No. 14921 of 2009 Rajiv Raushan @ Raju, son of Sri Manoj Singh, Resident of village- Nama, P.S. Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 08.05.2009 Supplementary affidavit on behalf of the petitioner is being filed in Cr. Misc. No.9914 of 2009. Let it be kept with the record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioners are accused in a case instituted under sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 473, 475 and 120-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code section 25(1-A), (1-B), 26, 35 of the Arms Act. Petitioner Munchun @ Sumit Kumar is said to be a Mechanic working in Scada Motors. It is submitted that he was traveling on the Bolero but had nothing to do with the theft of the Bolero. Petitioner Rajiv Raushan @ Raju was sitting in the Bolero car but nothing was recovered from his possession. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that co-accused Binay kumar Pandey @ Binay Shankar Pandey, who was also sitting in the Bolero car with mobile phone, has been granted bail by this court on 24.4.2009 in Cr. Misc. No. 14685 of 2009. Considering the aforesaid facts, petitioners, namely, 1. Munchun @ Sumit Kumar & 2. Rajiv Raushan @ Raju are directed to - 2 - be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Beur P.S. case no.30 of 2009. JA/- (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)