IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR; CHHATTISGARH / WRIT PETITION N0.é2#6? OF 20% Ganesh Ram Sahu, S/O Dambrudhax Sahu, Aged abeut 57 yearsa Presently posted and wcrking as Teachar in ihe Primary School, Bar, Block Baxamkela, District Raigarh (CG). PETITIONER: Versus WRIT PETITION UNDER‘ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA its Sectetaxy, of School Education, 2. Director: Qg Ce)“ D' . Hectorate, Ch]1a 1sgar @6 yg ‘ \.§\®\§v\ 3. Collector, 4. District Education Offlcer, Raigarh, Distrlct Raigarh (C.G.). 5. Block Education Officer, Baramkela, District Raigarh (0G,). 5 XLHC-22 m )3v. $1 . amt m mg‘P‘N027G7/%m m m“ mftrzram ‘ awrmm 26-81004 On a mention being madc, this c c is takén up. Petitioner/shy Shn‘ H~$. Advocail ’ Stats by Shri V‘V,S. Munhy, ‘ Advocatjq‘ General, with Shn' Satish Gupta, Dy‘G.A, and Shri Akhil Agawal and Heard. The matter reiates to transfer of t} e peutioner from the respective place. Counsel for the petitioner/s subm tted that the transfer of the petitionerk has been effected illegally in contravention of law policy. State counsel opposed it. State counsel submitted that th petitioner/s has straightway filed the petition without serving notice for demand ofjus c and representation. Having heard and considered t e rival contentions, Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case i . opinion of this Court, ends tiee will be served if a direction is given to ht peti oner/s to make detailed representation rats-mg his/her grievances and gounds before th State Govemrnentfeompetent authority of the respondents along with a copy of the peti ion and this order; within 10 daysgand on such representation being filed, the State Gove P , Sandeep Ijubey, Panel Lawyers. exit/competent authority of the respondents. under the law, shall consider and decide he same on its own merits in accordance With law as early as possible preferably with six weeks from the date of receiptproductzon of the representation. If any contraven 'on of policy or guidelines is brought to the notice. the same be considered on its own nerits. Counsel for the petitioner’s pra that after the decision of the representation if any grievance of the petitioner's remai hefshe may be allowed to avail the remedy available under the law. It is open to the p titioner to avail the remedy available under the law. ’r‘“ m m WW ' S d t: : or ‘z i ' y n: With the aforesaid observations, t is petition stands disposed of. Consequently X/[.W'.l?., ifany. als stands dispOsetl of, Certified rules. l sal- ‘ copy as per s s ' . . r Lopy to state counsel lor compliance. Fakhruddin . Judge i w 4% ’~ Vi k i Tina and?