..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3803 OF 2008 Mrs.Arathi Vishal Jadhav and anr. ..Applicants. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents. .... Ms.Sartaj Shaikh, Adv. for the applicants. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP, for the State. Mr.K.J. Hakani, Adv. for respondent No.2 .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 10th December, 2008. DATED : 10th December, 2008. DATED : 10th December, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicants - orig.accused, the learned Advocate for the respondent No.2 - orig.complainant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking quashing of C.C. No.979/PW/2007 pending before the Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 47th Court at Esplanade, Mumbai. It is under Sections 457, 452, 34 of IPC. The said case is in respect of C.R. No.174 of 2006 of Cuffe Parade police station. ..(2).. 3. The learned Advocate for the respondent No.2 - orig.complainant states that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and in view of the settlement between the parties, the respondent No.2 - complainant does not wish to continue with the prosecution in the said case. 4. In view of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of B.S.Joshi and another Vs. State of B.S.Joshi and another Vs. State of B.S.Joshi and another Vs. State of Haryana and another, reported in Judgment Today Haryana and another, reported in Judgment Today Haryana and another, reported in Judgment Today 2003(3) S.C.277 2003(3) S.C.277 2003(3) S.C.277, the prayer of the applicants can be considered. Hence, C.R.No.174 of 2006 of Cuffe Parade police station and the proceedings relating thereto are quashed. 5. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)