IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.306 of 2007 1. Ramakant Pandey son of late Mithu Pandey, resident of Village Raghunathpur P.S. Karakat, Distt. Rohtas 2. Brij Bihari Singh son of late Ram Lakhan Singh, resident of Village- Sonbarsa, P.S. Natwar, Distt. Rohtas ..Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Bihar 2. Deputy Development Commissioner, Rohtas, Sasaram 3. Director, National Rural Programme, Rohtas 4. Block Development Officer, Karakat Block, Rohtas 5. Officer Incharge, Karakat Police Station .. Respondents ----------- 8 12.2.2009 KHAN Learned counsel for the petitioners rightly submits that the institution of the case under section 161 of the Penal Code was palpably incorrect and as such the aforesaid provisions should be deleted. Learned State counsel submits that with due permission of the S.D.J.M., Bikramganj, Rohtas the error crept in the F.I.R. has been corrected by substituting appropriate provisions under the P.C.Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the file of the case may be forwarded to the Special Court trying the cases under the P.C. Act. It goes without saying that the said cases is to be forwarded before the Special Court for trying the offence under the P.C.Act. With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J)