1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE SIDE C.A.NO.966 OF 2005 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO.23552 OF 2004 | Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram | Court’s or Judge’s Orders appearances, Court’s orders or directions | and Registrar’s orders. | Mr.D.S.Sawant for Respondent Nos.2A & 2B. CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 8th September, 2011. P.C.: This is an application for condoning the delay of 104 days caused in filing the second appeal. None appears for the Applicants. Heard Mr.D.S.Sawant, learned counsel for Respondent Nos.2A & 2B. Office remark indicates that the Advocate for applicants did not take steps for bringing on record heirs of deceased Respondent No.1, as per the Court’s order dated 25.03.2010. Hence, the appeal stood abated qua Respondent No.1. For the reasons set out in the civil application, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), with no order as to costs. It is 2 clarified that the second appeal stood dismissed qua Respondent No.1 as per the Court’s order dated 25.03.2010. (R.G.KETKAR, J.)