1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3873 of 2009 (Mrs. Seema S. Ramteke ..vs.. Child Development Project Officer Ekatmik Bal Vias Seva Yojna Prakalpa and another) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Amol Mardikar, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri M.V. Mohokar, Advocate for respondent No.1, Shri F.G. Isaac, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM:- D.B. BHOSALE AND P. B. VARALE, JJ. DATED :- 23 rd JULY, 2010 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has challenged the select list dated 29- 6-2009 published by respondent No.1-Child Development Project Officer insofar as it relates to respondent No.2. The petitioner has also prayed for action against added respondent Nos. 4 to 7. 3. We have perused the writ petition, so also the reply- affidavit filed by respondent No.1. The challenge is on the ground that there is scoring in the marks, particularly the marks obtained by respondent No.2, which according to the petitioner show that how the marks of respondent No.2 2 were increased. We have perused the original record. Insofar as the petitioner and respondent No.2 are concerned, we do not find any scoring as alleged. Respondent No.1 in their reply-affidavit and more particularly in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5, have explained as to how the marks were allotted. We are satisfied with the explanation given by respondent No.1. We do not find any merits in the writ petition. The writ petition accordingly fails and dismissed as such. JUDGE JUDGE pma