^SSS^^^_ ,^'''s"€~.~"'^. ./'F" .^.^ x '?^»;"''*> HIQH COURTOF CHHATTiSGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 2270 of 2005 ^% PETITiONER RESPONDENTS Smt. Ramshila ^rawal, aged 66 years, W/o Shri Ganesh Prasad Agrawal, Rstired Asstt. Teacher, Subhas Kanya Prathmik Shaia Kramank-1, Gayatri Mandir, Durg (CG). Versus 1) State Govt. of CG, through the Secretary, Education Depfl., DKS (CG). 2) District Education Officer, Dur; 3) Accountant General, 9 (CG). No.3, Raipur 4) The Principal, Higher Secondary Sehool, Deepak Nagsr, Durg (CG). (Writ Petition under Artieie 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate for the psBtioner. Mr. Shashank Thakur, Panet Lawyer for the State. Mr. K. Shakeel, standing counsel for the respondent No.3. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 5 h day of May, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the case, being payment of retiral benefits matter, may be referred to the pension commitiee. 2) This Court, in the matter of W.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retrial dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The CommMee was constituted by the State Goi^mment, pursuant to the order dated 19-06-20)6 passed in W.P.No.1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and otters), and order dated 13-3-2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Ghhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath iVlandal and another). Thus, thls petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31SI January, 2008 passed in W.P.No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by learned counsei appearing forthe parties. •2-' Y\ 3) This petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.s., the officfe of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order as well as a copy of the petition from the petitioner. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and officers conceme<,j within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunlty of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may flle additional documents, If necessary. The entire exereise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner, be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5) The petitioner shall supply one compiete set of the petition to the State counsel as weli as counsel for the respondent No.3 for trareferring the same to the Committee. 8) in case of grievance with regard to non-payment of pensionery dues, it Is not necessary to flle a writ petition before thls Court directly. The representation/application can be moved before the Pension Committee as stated above. The Pension Committee shall not refuse to entertain the representation/application, if so fited directly. Gowri SA'- Satish K-.Agnihotri Judge