4‘ *wm‘m]m g ,wkwtTWY .: Quanw r ~ 3w): I“ ‘ wag v r mm .....................................-..............mzoo ‘ maym(W) x mm '..,........ vizoa mm’(m) wmm mmw mmm q, mm§wm animm The petitioner, by the instant petition, has prayed for direction to the respondent authorities to consider his case for appoinhnent on compassionate ground by inserting appropriate clause in their policy for compassionate appointment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that father of the petitioner namely late Achyu Pradhan died on 17.2. 1990 while he was in the employment as Assi tant Teacher in Govt. Primary School, Bhulnmuda, Block-Baramkel , Distt. Raigarh. His, case for appoinment was not conside on the ground that the petitioner’s father died before 1. 1 1. 1997 an therefore, as per policy of the State of Chhattisgarh (Annexure P/ 1), the petiu‘oner is not entitled to be appointed on compassionate yound. He further submits that representation of . the petitioner for compassionate appointment (Annexure P/ 3) has not yet been decided by the respondent authorities and the same is still pending. However, he submits that he is not pressing’this petition at this stage and prays for liberty tc tile hesh representan'on before the competent authority, who may be further directed to decide his representation within a specified period. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the ' petitioner was not entitled for compassionate appointment as per policy of the State Govt. of Annexure P/ 1. Even otherwise, father of the petitioner died on 17.2.1990 whereas the instant petition was died in the year 2009 i.e. about nineteen years after the death of his father. appoinhnent is to enable the fa crisis and to relieve them m) get over the emergency. In th se circumstances, the petitioner is not entitled for compassionate app inhnent. The object of granh'ng compassionate mily of the deceased to tide over sudden fmancial destitution and to help them I have heard learned co sel for the parties. It is settled law that p blic employment cannot be given on descent. favour of the children or 0th relatives of the employees, who died ainnnent on compassionate ground is lediate hardship which is faced by the ath of the bread earner. When an passionate ground,:.it should be kept seeks to achieve, the idea being not to While rendering services, Appj given only for meeting the imn family by reason of the de appointment is made on com conhned only to the purpose i1 provide for endless compassioni In the instant case, it petitioner died in the year 199 hled in the year 2009. Thus, ,onsidering the arguments advanced by Shri Pankaj 'Shn'vastava, learned Panel Lawyer as also the settled principles of law in this regard, is not in dispute that father of the whereas the instant petition has been no direction for grant of compassionate appointment to the“ petin'oner can be issued by this Court. Accordingly, the petition being without any substance is hereby dismissed at the admission stage itself. ' Sd/- Dhirendra Mishrai Judge . / K/ Appointment on co passionate ground is an exception in