THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.2286 OF 2010 ORDER This petition has been taken out under Section 482 Cr.P.C by B.V.Prasanna Kumar seeking to quash the First Information Report in Cr.No.32 of 2010 of Governorpet Police Station, Vijayawada. The petitioner worked as Administrative Officer in VGTM Urban Development Authority, Vijayawada. He allegedly executed sale deeds in respect of 70 plots on behalf of VGTM Urban Development Authority without authorization. A report came to be presented by Vice Chairman of VGTM Urban Development Authority before the Station House Officer, III Town Police Station, Governorpet, Vijayawada. Basing on the said report, a case in Cr.No. 32 of 2010 came to be registered against the petitioner. Hence, this petition. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the second respondent-State. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner executed sale deeds basing on the authorization issued by one M.Ramachandra Reddy and therefore, it cannot be said that he executed registered sale deeds in respect of 70 plots un- authorisedly. A further submission has been made that VGTM Urban Development Authority cancelled the sale deeds. The plot owners filed WP No.13032 of 2006 & batch and the writ petitions came to be allowed by this Court on 24-3-2008. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the first respondent submits that the first respondent filed suits for cancellation of the allotments as the allotments have been made by a person who is not competent. A further submission has been made that it is the petitioner who executed the sale deeds without there being any authorization on behalf of the VGTM Urban Development Authority and thereby caused substantial loss to the VGTM Urban Development Authority. As seen from the material placed on record, the Vice Chairman submitted a report dated 1-2-2010 before the Station House Officer stating that the petitioner executed sale deeds without there being any authorization and mis- appropriated the sale consideration. In view of the specific accusation levelled against the petitioner, this is not a fit case to interdict the proceedings. Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed. As a squeal to it, the interim stay granted on 11-3-2010 shall stand vacated. __________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY,J rkk Dated: 2-11-2011