THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5358 of 2010 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The petitioner who is the tenant files this Revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking to assail the correctness of the order, dated 25.10.2010, passed in I.A.No.474 of 2010 in R.A.No.161 of 2008 on the file of the Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, dismissing the application purported to be filed under Order VI Rule 17 C.P.C. seeking permission to amend the counter in R.C.No.164 of 2005 by adding certain portion thereto. The main ground urged in support of the said application was to the effect that the petitioner wants to bring the subsequent events to the notice of the Court. The Court below dismissed the said application observing that all such subsequent events can as well be brought to the notice of the Court by filing an affidavit rather than by making any amendment. Hence, the present Revision. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and on perusal of the relevant material on record, it is seen that as long as the petitioner is permitted to bring all the subsequent events by an appropriate affidavit, there cannot be any grievance on the part of the petitioner again. The Court below has gone into the merits of the case and made several observations, which are not necessary to be made as long as the main appeal is pending. In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However, the Court below is directed to dispose of the appeal uninfluenced by any of the observations or findings made by it in the impugned order. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO 10th December 2010 DR