IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.86 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.86 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.86 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4138 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.4138 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.4138 OF 2006 Devendra S. Doctor ...Applicant Versus. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Applicant in person. Ms P.P.Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 19th MARCH, 2008. : 19th MARCH, 2008. : 19th MARCH, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. As per the administrative order passed by the Hon’ble the Chief Justice on 29th February, 2008, this application has been assigned to this Court. Heard the applicant appearing in person. By order dated 27th November, 2006 rule was issued in Criminal Application No.4138 of 2006 and for reasons recorded therein ad-interim relief was granted in terms of prayer clause (b). After having heard the applicant appearing in person and after perusing the application, I find that there is no reason to vacate or stay the interim relief granted by order dated 27th November, 2006. The Criminal Application is still pending for final hearing and therefore all contentions which are raised in this application can be always raised at the time of final hearing of the application. Subject to what is stated above, application is rejected. The applicant appearing in person seeks a certificate for preferring an appeal to Supreme Court. Prayer is rejected. Judge. Judge. Judge.