CRR No.1719 of 2010(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.1719 of 2010(O&M) Decided on:- 06.07.2011 Veerpal Kaur ......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondents Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajai Lamba Present: Mr. Amit Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. Tarsem Singh, Advocate for respondents no.2 to 5. **** Ajai Lamba, J(Oral) CRM No. 31058 of 2010 Delay of 29 days in filing the revision petition is condoned. CRM is allowed. CRR No. 1719 of 2010 Respondents no.2 to 5 were tried for commission of offence under Sections 498A, 406, 109 IPC and acquitted vide judgment rendered by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Talwandi Sabo dated 15.12.2008. The judgment of acquittal has been up held by Sessions Judge, Bathinda vide the other impugned judgment dated 26.10.2009. Perusal of para no.10 of the judgment rendered by Sessions Judge, Bathinda makes it evident that in the complaint given to the police, initially payment for Rs.50,000/- for purchase of a mini truck (Canter) was made. General allegations were levelled against all the accused. In the complaint, specific allegations of substantial improvements in record to demand one gold bangle and one gold ring etc. were made. Specific entrustment to different accused was also reflected. In view of substantial improvement in the two versions, the case of the complainant has been found to be not trustworthy. CRR No.1719 of 2010(O&M) 2 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has not been able to justify the improvements by the complainant at different stages. In view of the above, I do not find that any relevant piece of evidence has been ignored by the Courts below while adjudicating. Perverse reading of evidence is also not indicated. No ground for interference in revisional jurisdiction is made out. Dismissed. 06.07.2011 ( Ajai Lamba) mamta Judge