The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.16289 of 2010 Dated 25th August, 2010 Between: Kandi Ram Reddy …Petitioner And The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate, Gachibowli, Hyderabad and 10 others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: None appeared Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4: AGP for Home Counsel for respondent Nos.5 to 10: ----- The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.4, in filing chargesheet in the Court of the learned X Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, Malkajgiri, without proper investigation of Crime No.320 of 2009, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner sought for a consequential direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to entrust further investigation of the said Crime to respondent No.3 to apprehend respondent Nos.8 to 11 and their associates. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. I have perused the entire record including the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.4. The material available on record discloses that in connection with the property admeasuring Ac.12-20 guntas comprised in Survey No.599 of Madhavapuri Colony, Sainikpuri, Kapra Municipality, Keesara Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, the petitioner alleged fraud committed by respondent No.5, in collusion with respondent No.7, by fabricating certain documents and executing sale deeds over 60 plots. The grievance of the petitioner is that though Crime No.133 of 2004 was registered on the private complaint filed by him, respondent No.4 has failed to investigate the offence properly and omitted to include the names of the persons, who are associated in the fraud, in the chargesheet filed by him. A detailed counter-affidavit has been filed by respondent No.4, wherein it is inter alia stated that the investigation revealed that respondent Nos.5 and 6, who are the father and daughter and also accused Nos.1 and 2 in the above-mentioned crime, colluded with each other with evil intention to cause wrongful loss to the petitioner; that in order to make a wrongful gain for themselves, they have fabricated document bearing No.7361/93; that accused No.4, being document writer, prepared the fabricated document and accused Nos.3 and 5, signed as witnesses thereto; that accused Nos.1 and 2, who are the master minds for preparation of the fictitious documents, have conspired with accused Nos.3 to 5 in such preparation by impersonating the father of LW.1; that after completion of investigation, chargesheet was filed in the Court of the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, Malkajgiri and that the case was taken on file as CC.No.1071 of 2009, which is pending trial. Having carefully considered the facts of the case, I am of the opinion that when once the chargesheet is filed, it is the jurisdictional Court, which is vested with the power to deal with the same in accordance with the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘the Code’). I n Sakiri Vasu vs. State of U.P. and others[1], the Supreme Court held that the power of the Magistrate under Section 156 (3) of the Code is wide enough even to order for further investigation, if a case is made out that the Police Officer concerned has not made proper investigation. In view of this settled legal proposition, I am not inclined to examine the merits of the contentions raised by the petitioner, while exercising this Court’s jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is permitted to file appropriate application before the jurisdictional Magistrate and on receipt of such application, the learned Magistrate shall examine the same in the light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Sakiri Vasu (cited supra) and pass appropriate orders after hearing the parties. Subject to the above observations, the Writ Petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.20522 of 2010, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J Dated 25th August, 2010 lur [1] AIR 2008 SC 907