r, .p 2’5 (,6©// IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P. No. 40W /200@r (3.3.) PETITIONER Rambabu Gupta, S/o Shri Ramdas Gupta, aged about 40 years, R/o Near Jain Hospital Kota, Bilaspur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh , Through Secretary ,. Education Department , D.K‘S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Director of public Instruction , Pensionbada Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (5) No. 1081 af 2001’ Pa'ri'i'ioner : Rambabu Gup'm Versus Responden‘ts : Sfa're of Ch'na‘f'fisgarh & anather‘ 5ingie Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Jusi'ice Sa‘iish K. Agniha‘fri. Mr. Kumaresh Tiwari, Advocate for The pefifioner. Smt Anju Ahuja, Depu'fy Governmen'i' Advoca‘fe for 'I’he Sfate/responden'rs. ORDER (Passed on fhis 26*h Day of February, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for fhe pe+i?ioner submits: fha'i' ‘rhe pe’i’i‘finner is warking as Assisfam’ Teacher/Lecturer. The pe‘i’i’rioner obiuinad B‘ Ed. Examinafion cer‘i’ifica’i'e on 02-9-1995, an his own expenses. Learned counsei appearing .far +he pe‘i’ifianer submi'rs fha'i' +he qLies'fion invoived, herein asfo whef'ner The Teacher, who abfained B‘ Ed. Examina'rion Ceriificai'e on his own expenses is enfi+ied +9 Mo advance increments. Accarciing 'io learned counsei for “the pe'i'i'fioner, 'fhe pe‘l'i‘i'ioner is en‘ri'i’ied f0 Two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court in i'the case of Vashwan‘t Kutnar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipai Corporafion, Dung and anofher {2006 CED MEIR-CG 96}. This Courf in 'i'he case of Vashwan't Kumar Bhemdwaj Vs. Municipal Corpora’fion, Burg and anofher (Supra), came ‘to “the conclusion fha't 'the teachers, who had ob'tained E. Ed. /B.T.I. Examination Cer’tificafe on Their own i 2 ? expenses, are covered by ‘I'he circular dafed 24.12.98 issued by fhe S’rm‘e Governmen‘r of Madhya Pradesh. Learneci counsel for The pe‘l’ifioner fur'i’her submi'fs +ha'r 'i'he facfs me question of Eaw involved in 1'he presem’ Case are squarely covered by decision of f‘nis Cour-r in 'l'he case of Yashwan‘r Ku‘mor Bharadwaj Vs‘ Munioipal Corpooa‘fion, Durg and ano-i'her (Supra), fo which learned counsel appearing for lhe respondem's fairly concedes and agrees wi'i'h 'ihe avermenf made by learned counsel appearing for 'i'he pefi‘rioner. Accordingiy, she wri‘f peri‘i’ion is allowed in +er'ms of fhe order passed in fine case of Vashwan‘i' Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. #iunicipai Corpora‘i'ion, Durg and ono‘fher (Supra), subject fo verifica-i'ion of fhe facf as To whefher The pe'i’ifioner has acquired B. Ed. Examination Cerfificafe on his own expenses as per f'ne circulars dafed 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 and furf‘ner whefher he has been paid 'i'wo advance l incremenfs or no‘i’. No order as 'ro cos-is. t:. Sd/ l Satish K. :Agnihotri l Judge Subhash