1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4367 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.3753 OF 1998 Mrs.Parveen Kanta Rajnish Jain and Anr. .. Plaintiffs Versus M/s.Rachana Construction Co. and Ors. .. Defendants Mr.N.D.Jaywant for plaintiffs Mr.D.Shukla i/b. M.U.Panday for defendants. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 21st January 2009. P.C. . This is plaintiffs’ motion. However, the motion has not been served on the defendants till date. Settlement talks were in progress and this is the reason why this motion could not be served, according to plaintiffs’ Advocate. 2. I see no reason to keep such notice of 2 motion pending. Motion is dismissed. However, the plaintiffs are at liberty to file a fresh notice of motion seeking reliefs that are claimed in the notice of motion. All pleas of both sides are kept open. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)