IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2009 / 26TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 8474 of 2009(D) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MAYA S.P., AGED 19,D/O.JAYAPRAKASH P.V., ANAVADHYA, MAVICHERRY, PAYYANNUR P.O., KANNUR-670 307. BY ADV. SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY SRI.ABHILASH MATHEW SRI.T.A.ABDUL RASHEED SRI.ADEEP ANWAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY. 4. THE BOARD OF ADJUDICATION OF GRIEVANCES, CALICUT UNIVERSITY. 5. THE COMMISSIONER FOR ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR, TRIVANDRUM-1. 6. M/S. VEDA VYASA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, KARADPARAMBA, PONNAMPADAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL. GOVT. PLEADER SMT. M.R. SREELATHA. ADV. SRI. P.C. SASIDHARAN, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 8474 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 17th March, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a student who originally obtained admission to Engineering Entrance Examination during the year 2008 in the merit seat. But, since the petitioner did not join the higher option course, the admission was cancelled. Now, the petitioner's grievance is that the 6th respondent is not releasing the certificates submitted by the petitioner at the time of admission. The petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed Ext. P8 petition before the 4th respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 4th respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P8 expeditiously so that at least this year the petitioner can pursue her studies. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the University also. 3. I am of opinion that the 4th respondent should consider and pass orders on Ext. P8 expeditiously. Accordingly, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 4th respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P8, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as the 6th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.