IN THE ggwa tougo o, qguitAgggE A? JABAQEUR WRIT P3?ITIQ§ UQQER ARTICLE 227 CF THE CONSTITUTION DE I wRxT PLrLTION ._ i )5:§ cm=19g§ Petitioner : Union of India, through its General Manager, South Eastern Railway, Garaen Reach, Calcuttao — V E R S U S - 1n Sharda PraSad son o£ Sukhdeo Prad. §§§29Q£§£3§ = 2. Mohanlal son of Sukhdeo Prasad. 3. Smt. Karuna Wid0w of Jagaish Prasad» 4. Manishkumar, son of, Jagdishprasad{ 5. Ashishkumar son o£ Jagdishprasade 6. Pariveshkumar, son of, Jagdishprasad. Nos, 5 and 6 minor through mother Karuna. All residents of G01 Bazar,.Bilaspur, Tahgil and District Bilaspura 7a Estate Officer, South Eastern Railway, Bilaspur (MP)- NULA as 2A ,7 XI—Hc—zz mas? WWH i‘wW WW w Jq’ .' ‘AA‘ $amaa§$ 06-04—2005 Shn' Viuay Harit, Sr. Advocate with Smt. Preeti Budhia, i counsel for the imtitioner] Raiipvays. None appeam on behalfgof the respondent] s. Heard. Leamed counsel for th petitioner] Railways submitted that all the ex-Iicensees have ady evicted the pmmises and have shiftecl their business to Vyapar Vihar area Where alternative accommodah‘on s been allotted to them by the State Government. He also bmlts that in View of this, the petition becomes inmotuous‘ Accordingly, the peti ‘on stands disposed of as inn‘actuous. Consequently, pending: pplications, if any, also stand disposed of. 2 Fakhruddi‘n 3 Judge t ‘ Sd/—