IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellanious No.13230 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Dilip Kumar Gupta @ Dippan Sah 2. Chintaman Singh. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== 2 27.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the complainant. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323, 342, 379 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner is of assaulting the complainant and committing theft of the gold chain. The accusation has been levelled in the background of the fact that the complainant gave Rs. 50,000/- to the petitioner in the year 2002 for supply of the bricks. The claim of the petitioner is that the brick has been supplied worth Rs. 75,000/-. It appears that a Sanha was also lodged by the petitioners' side against the complainant prior to the present complaint. Considering the background of the contractual nature of the relationship between the parties, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub- divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dalsingsarai, Samastipur in connection with C.R. No. 474/10 , subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)