IN THE:. HZGH COVS.T !®K-aUBIGftTDRS :AT BZIASPUR::;'<C.G.. 5 W.E. )S'OA%^ /2002 PETITIONER ^••^ c:v*'' <-» -.* ,.<^£^" ^e .A ' RESPONDEK'TS VBRSUS 2. 3. 4. 5. Trigunanan^ pan^cy •': : ..^ age* absut 58 years, - •: S/0 Late Shri Kamal PaBaIey i;|-, 'E'ftreman Idchar'ge, Geyra ,., : ': Tawfe AAmi.iaistrakisn DeparfemanS.;^ Ssufch EastcrB^GaaIficlds . i!; Llmltefi, Bila8pur:(C.G.5 :'.^: Ssuth EasfeerB Cua.lflelAs J.F!:: i /. .! l.:t: Limite<^ Bilaspuc : I.U; fehrsugh Chairman-eum-Maaag.i.agllit} Direcfr, Bila:spur. tC.G.)'':.: |'!||| ©irectar(PersTiatfl:^ ' '. i'3 Saufeh EasternfQsalflelAs^ t,ti(3| B.i.laspur (e.G.) Chisf Ssneral:Maaagefc-i : (Mara Pswer),' ?, . Seu^h :Eaatern::-.Csa.l:i;3-®l^s; Llm.i.fceA, Bitagpur, (G|.®.5 Chief G»Eier»lrHaaacteEi SevE-a Area, ;,;; ' . j I;! SSUth EasteraieBal^itea.^s:' t.imiteA,, , ; :.: IMn 'Dls&slct. Ksrbs.!?e.<3 Oepyty Ch.laf per Ssu.lA; Easfeara •[ S«yra: iEa.sAEy.et>· RsrKa sriialell f*al-ffl le<®,, :r.l a-lilig^ :lr'l 2. £ETITION! UND2R•ARTICLE 225;OF -THE CQNm^^^^_ _^S^J FQR ISSUANCS OF NRIT OP CERTIORASI AND HftNiaHUS:^XNO.IS@Rlil OTHER liEITS Al-SD DIRECTIONS :- .^ /. u- XJ-HC-22 SD^IW fqii.cn <^i^i ^)NN> ^Iifl ^s? •<<iii<n'li, anl^f'is, («i<nitiy NIKCTIthllthv^.^..^as%z0^- "^T. 200 fN^sr" eh1f^(?^4trf HIH^ff ^ l^1^ <^1'(-^1< ^i'SlfitCTSII^I 2-1-2004 Shri Sandeep Dubey, Ad ^ocate for the petitioner. Shri Dhtrendra Mlshra, ^dvocate for the respondents. With consent heard finalllv. 2. The petitioner has ffled tf^is petitkin for setting aside fhe order Annexurc P-11 date|d 2/3-12-2002 whcreby his appllcation for voluntary re1 •enemt faas been accepted. The petitioner's contention is tha^ hls Voluntary retirem.ent has been illegally accepted eveti without any formal/proper application made by h1m. 3. The respondents ha.ve ffed retum. The respondents in thc rctum havc uiadc categori' was retlred from the service ;al statcmcnt that thc pctitioncr on tus own request. They have Bled Annexures R-1 showing tl|iat the petitioner hiinself applied for voluntary retireinent.stA^-pFese^teedAasiat. Annexure R- 1 is relevant and quoted belowj; To, l | The Chlef General Manager, South Bastem Coal Fields Liinited Oevra Area, Throiigla.:- Proper ^becnnel. Subject :- Applicatjion for Voliintan^ Retirement. Respected Str, With due respect j wish to inform you that 1 am i working in Colony Powe^ Supply 8& maintenance (E & M) ^ r——-• • ——-—•'— ————- •— -—;'— - ---~~- • • ~—•' .—•• • ——• . -. -—"• [ift^y<g<) XJ-HC-22 '3^f •<ii<iiw<i, afllu'ie, (qiaitiy *II*ICTI aiiicb 3TT^?T XRrq? _ _ / _'^..'..?.l.^o..:..2:.e ^<3/e> ')- "W( 200 sii^r^r Tq-ii?h -STI^I ?ti+iict'> ^riiti sn^i TCIIW ^ifttT •3L- ; ^ilittfe'^t'I ^\W^[^ fe^ <f^'(-^R ^; <ffP?[*l sii^r ;ar, Oevra Area. T am not in a job any more because ofray poor to your honour that kindly atlow Retireiaent Scheine of the depart.ment of IJrja Na^ar, condition to perform my health. Therefore I request] rae to retire under company. Tharddng you, in ajnticipation ofyour early positive response. Yours sincerely, Volufitary El T.N. PANDEY FOREMAN IN CHIEF & M/COLONY POWER SUPPLY URJA NAGAR, GEVRA AREA" appl^cation 4. Aftcr filing thc abovc applied for Voluntary rettrem^ page 7 of the return. The "APPLICATION POR To, CHIEF GENERAL I^ANAGER SECL GEVRA AREA s|pplication, fhc pctitioncr agedn {nt by an application wluch is at is reproduced below:- V^LUNTARY RETIREMENT Sir, I, T.N. PANDEY apply for voluntary conditions laid down in 1 to me. Scjn/wile of Shri K.Paiidey hereby I have understood thc :he schenie which are acceptable retjreinent, Name Si! T.N. PANDEYi Yours falthfuUv, ^natm'e/Left Thumb Impression [^^ XI-HC-22 'Tc? '<II<)I<'I<LI, »Ti1wre, wini+iy .^:.l^Ms..-..^V5^/o^ *lttlrt|sb«icb"""""""""""""""""""'g^ 2( sii^rqii Kw* s^v %UEicfi y^a sn^i TOiwaft'ti -3 ^)I^lf?t^lurl 'RTR^Tf "41^^ ^H+^K '^SJPOTSffI^I nesignatioTi F.M. T/0 Category/GradeA-1 (SI|,4) Unit E & M | Scale 6000-300-8400 CMPFNO. A/337(1)36 Identitv Card No.21453^4' 5. It is subuiitted that th^ 8-2002 and, the formaUtics i4 prepared. It is on 3- 12-20C|2 about his retirem.ent as per] been done at the request petitioner himself. Shri arc rcady to relcasc thc aitid MisHra ainoitnt application was processed on 5- ere coinpleted and accounts ete. the petitioner was infonned Annexure P-11 and all this has the applicatlons made by the subiaits that the respondents duc to bc paid. heretnabove cep|tan( 6. Oncc thc pctitioncr applications mentioned processed and accepted and tiU it was acccpted, thc accepjta The contention that fhe ^ accepted even witfaout any hlm does not appear to be and they have been accepted.| Act is also relevant and quot^d ^uakcs not only onc but two and the same have been pie petitioner inade no grievance sp|tancc cannot be said to bc illegal. yoluntaiy retirement has been fo^mol/proper application m.ade by L. He had made appllcatlons Here section 115 of the Evidence below:- c<t>rrect. [^Wa^ XI-HC-22 ~3^ 'fmwil, aflly'ic, IsKii'yy wwinrgiTrai sn^riRrg? M.:.£.-..^.0...-...ar..<:^><S/A'2- '"a^. 2'oo I^G^T' 311^1'W K'li* S^V. ?^-fT^> 1H1 siiiawaiwafei L.i cti|^<r1'i'ilT1 iW^ "^ f^<crl •lll^l^.K ^ aii^fii sii^r • "115.Estoppel.-When act or onussion, int another person to upon such bellef, be allowed, in any and such person or his of that thing." o|ne person has, by his deolaration, sntionaUy caused or permitted a thing to be true and to act he nor lus representattve shall or proceeding between himself representative, to deny the trutli beli^ve neifhler sult 7. Here in the kistant petitioner faas not disclos applications for voluntory appllcatlons along with the and correct facts. He oughi corrcct facts and it was his petitioner seeks a writ mi underArticles 226/227 of desires to invoke extraordi disclose the factual aspect. cAse, sxtraord^iary :, while filuig thc petition, fhc id tlie fact ttiat he has flled rfetu'ement and he did not file the jpetition and suppressed the true to ha.ve disclosed the true and jbounden duty spccially whcn thc ^oking extraordinary jurisdiction Constitution of India. One who juTisdiction, is required to t&e 8. In view of thesubmisi view of the Annexures R- Department acted Ulegally iUegaUy or contrsiry to law. ions made by the pardes and m 1, it cannot be said that the the petltloner has been retlred atid 9. Havir^ considered tb^ case and m.aterial on recordl facts and cu-cumstances of fhe , ui the opinion of this Court, no ['Ai^^ "IK XI-HC-22 gn^i'^i . 'R'igmN ^wcf) ^re^i '3^ ••vswv^, 's'Swm, fewtiy Sff^ T13R^ l^ .^ ^o-^'y^,^^ "":"""W^ ..28(^. aBR'ITWllt% SII^t TSIIWBfSd ^+ case forany interference m extraorduiary jurisdiction un The petiUon fails and is dlsm .mi' cti^tfTWllt '^^^ ^t^s^t ^ g.R: ^ •2irt:a'? sii^i |he jmpiigned order in exercise of |der Article 226/227 is made out. lsse(— — Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^