THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO M.A.C.M.A. No. 1899 of 2011 JUDGMENT: The appeal is filed by the claimant against the judgment dated 01.12.2004 in O.P.No.1559 of 2002 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-VI Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Nizamabad questioning the quantum of compensation. The appellant herein is said to have been received injuries in a motor accident on 25.08.2002 while traveling in the Tata Sumo bearing No.AP-25-F-888 from Nizamabad to Vemulawada, due to rash and negligent driving of the driver of the Tata Sumo, it turned turtle and the petitioner received multiple injuries. The 1st respondent is the owner and the 2nd respondent is the insurance company and after conducting enquiry, the lower Tribunal has granted a compensation of Rs.26,000/-. The insurance company has not filed any appeal questioning the liability. According to the case of the appellant, the petitioner has suffered fracture of ribs and he spent some amount for medical expenses and he was disabled and the lower Tribunal has not properly granted the compensation. As can be seen from Ex.A-3, the petitioner is said to have sustained fracture of 6th and 7th ribs. The evidence of P.W.2 goes to show that he examined the petitioner and the injuries are grievous in nature. The petitioner was said to be in hospital for two days. Evidently, the evidence of P.W.2 does not show that there was any disability. P.W.2, who is a Government doctor and treated the petitioner, has opined the disability at 35%, but the lower Tribunal has not taken into consideration the evidence, as the certificate was not issued by a medical board. But, however, the fact remains that the petitioner received fractures of the ribs and also the hospitalized, and there was temporary partial disability and, taking into consideration the above facts, I feel the ends of justice would meet, if the compensation is fixed at Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) instead of Rs.26,000/- as granted by the lower Tribunal. With the above modification, the appeal is allowed. No costs. ________________________ N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO, J 06-09-2011 MR THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO M.A.C.M.A. No. 1899 of 2011 DATE: 06-09-2011 MR