11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.2721/2010 I MAHESH KUMAR Petitioner Tlirough |\/is. Priyanka M. Bhardwaj, Adv. versus UOI AND ORS Respondents Through IVir. D.S. jviahendru, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR t ORDER % 23.04.2010 1. The petitioner's candidature for appointment to the post of Constable (GD) with the Central IndustrialSecurity Force (CISF) was rejected on the ground that on 22"'^ February, 2010, he was declared medically unfit for reasons of his being knock knees. The petitioner has submitted that he has approached the Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi as well as Rao Tula Ram Memorial Hospital under the Govt. of NCT of Delhi who have found no evidence of knock knees. The certificatesfrom these two hospitals have ^been placedon record by the petitioner. 2. The petitionercontendsthat his appeal was erroneouslyrejected by the office of the Deputy Inspector General, CISF by an order dated 30^^ March, 2010 on the ground that the certificateof SafdarjungHospital does not state that the petitioner does:not have knock knees. 3. Mr. D.S. Mahendru,learnedcounselappearingfor the respondentson ^ Contd P/3 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified - 3 - advance notice submits tliat the petitioner has not filed an appeal in the correct format and has not enclosed the requisite documents which is manifested from the impugned order dated 30''" March, 2010. It is contended that the respondents would examine the matter in accordance with law in case the petitioner approaches the respondents by an appropriate appeal which is filed as per prescribed procedure enclosing the requisite documents. 4. In view of the above, we grant liberty to the petitioner to submit an appeal to the respondents in the prescribed format enclosing all documents as are required including medical certification of the petitioner's fitness, if any, with regard to the ground on which the petitioner has been declared as unfit by the respondents. 5. Needless to say, the appeal as and when filed shall be disposed of expeditiously. 6. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's contentions. ^ This writ petitionis disposedof in the aboveterms. Dasti. G JfA MITTALH^ APRIL 23, 2010 aa INDERMEET KAUR, J