c^ ^^^^(S4P-1^ INTHEHON'BLEHIGH COURT OF^CHHATnSGARH_AT BILASPUR P.LLWRI'LPETmQNNO._ 2-L^-^ /2002 'Ki II j PETITIONER CHIRANJILAL CHANAP, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, SON OF LATE SHRI SHOBHARAM CHANAP, R/0. VILLAGE CHILPI, P.0. AMALINAGRI, TAH. NAGRI, DISTT. DHAMTARI, PRESENTLY POSED AT GUNDERDEHI, DISTT. DURG (CHHATTISOARH) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ STATE OP CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH : SECRETARY, . GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE • DEPARTMENT, MANTRALAY, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR, CHHATTISGARH. 2) STATE OP MADHYA PRADESH, THROUGH : SECRETARY, GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT (STATE ; ORGANISATION CELLj VALIABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL t<0 -^tf&\.(?^-r^^~- MANTRALAY, VALU ''?3:::'-::"x^7?^-*';'"1"'" (MADHYAPRADESH) ' cl-l!\'-'" / ..•• ^•^w^^^-- y^^21'^^.^' . d8ts&'"" 3) SECRETARY, STATE OP CHHATTISGARH, DEPARTMENT, OF REVENUE, MANTRALAYA, D.K.S. BHAWAN, 8AIPUR (CHHATTISGARH). 4) SECRETARY, STATE OP MADHYA PBADESH,; DEPARTMENT. OF REVENUE, MANTRALAYAl VALLABH BHA^AN, BHOPAL (C.G.) .^' ^€) UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH : SECRETARY, KARMIK LOK .SIKAYAT TATHA PENSION: MANTRALAY, KARMIK AVAM PRASIKSHAN .VIBHAG, TISRI MANJIL,^iOK NAYAK SHAWAN, KHAN MARKET, NEWJ3fiLHI. WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES226Z226 OFTHE CQNSTrTOTION OF; INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN _ NATURE QF M^NDAMUSj CERTIORARI, PROHIBTTION ETC. OR ANY OF MAY OTHER^LIKg NATURS,_QRANY_0'mER^COMMAND OR DIRECTION. » XI-flC-22 'S^ -<<1<IK1<1, dtfty'lli, f«l^llti1<. an^r 'WSR W.P. ^^^|f^e^l— '«wvtn*<t<»~""""""~ ~}"~~.'"'g^ -aa^ ftre^p •***»»»•**•»»< y oiAo »wwilufta wilwhiwrt9<|Etid (BU<I< *»jpin-a»to( '•'"<'>• •-.^•^ii OR D B (28-4-200^) Tfais-tiatch of petitlpns ha< ^^s?^ ( been fded by the petitioners pursuant to the crcation of ^tates under the^ M.P. State ;^?eorgani^atlog Act 200^ The dl^putes;re]ait:e to ttie allocatlon : 'ny , •':.?j;.%.' • 1'1:.'. •,:'':' yi: j- •.•. of the emplovees of &e State povemment. It is contended ...i'- thal un.der the provisions oftheJAct and poUcy framed by aiid or ar the behest of tl-ie Centr^l Qoveniment, options vvere iiwned. It is submitted diat fijial allocation has been madc aiid aggrieved b\ rhe saine d-i^se peutions have been filed before tliis Court clalmiiig relle-ts mentioned therein. 2. Learnecl comisel for all th^ petitioners sta.ted at the Bar thal in tlie preseiit batch of pe^itions, none of the petitioners i& in iiKiicial service or in t.l-ie ^ervicc ofVidhan Sabha. Tl-i<-\ all arc- (-nil)lr\'C(-?. of (llc dc|-jai)t.ment.s otl-iei- thgji tl-ic abovf- saicl cleoanmcnTs. ii is also sTat-ed ihat some cases are llsTed ai n-10T)oii l-if-.vni-ig ancl They ai-ej belng heai-d analogouslv wirii ['8*Wsrt , XI-HC-22 t^J 2 'S^ •<ii<<i<"i<i, »til«*i6,(«rowy an^?T IIiTSR^ »«>Wlf•BiNI'6 ^E?' aa^r'w fiF^aiga s^wv vt^v M<ify41;i wvS ^jft1^ <f<i«<K ^S^Wife^ consent of the parties fmolly, as copiQS have heensupplied aiid tlie acknowledgemeKts ha5(e been obfained 3. Shri Mi.trthv submitted Ihat Central Govemraent has ffled Uie rcti-im in W.P. No. 2£ same be adQpted In all coa^ 153/2002 and prayed that the ecled <sases, whlch was not opposed and allowed. 4. Shri Saiijay . K. AgTaifal, Dy. Advocate General, submitted tl-iat State has filed detaUed retum in Writ Petitions No.2215/02 (Dr. R'.K. Tiwari vs| State), No. 2547/02 (Blmnrao vs. Union of India) and Ncr:24p7/02 (Sluya Sliai'aii Sliaiiiia vs. Unlo^ of India). He furth^r submltted that TAe saine Ke adopted in other cases also, jwhich was not opposed and allon'ed. 5. Duiing t.lie course ofai'gi.ji'nent.s, counsel foi- some of the pctii ioncr-, subniii.tcd t.hat tlie^ havc filcd tlic s.ynopsis. Tlicv 'ma\ be laken/Tiied/Tagged. [<a^^w Ja-HC-22 ^ 3 ^rs? •<<i<<m<<, »nl*i*re,(•lctiu^ sn^r 'vfsf^ •<i*wii ti>«<i<*»"'~^""~~'"""~ ""~'~-'!H^ . .2(9 . (^^(j •— felfkMd w^itwnKUfta ^•nfefil^'wi'iltM <P»yi< ^OCaidiitw ••?;""' 6. Coiinsel for, thfi pfititiorjftrs point.efi oiir. ,r.har in sonie cases, tl-ieii- sp&uses are livorldng in the Govt./Semi Govemnient departments of..}one State whereas they have .•l^s been allocated to anothcr Stafa and in that vicw ;of the uiatter, Sthey pray ttiat triey s]3puld;^|w& be©^allocated lo the same State where UieiT spouses arf worktng. It is submitted that reorganizauon of the State, injso far as they have been posted in sepai'ate State, has re| suparation causuig disturbai^ ^ulted ui automattc judicial ;c 'in tlicu' family lifc, cs]^cciall\ pai'Liiig compaiiy ofcluldreii y^id pareiiLs. Il is subuiiLied iliai while decAding tl-ie allocation r(iatter, this aspect has not been considered in proper prospl i-econsider the sanie. Their ca^ 'ctive and there is ncefl to es should also be coiisidered. 7. It is contendcd that. po^ting of serving spoii&es in ti-ie Coi'ixiraiion. LocaJ bodies, C^irporatc ofiices, organizaTions iind insTiruiions is also a clafcs of spoiises who desei-\''e i.he saine ('nnsi(ierarion. 'l'he\- contenclecl that they. aj'e sei-ving in Ci»i^ 4 M-HC-22 7^ •<<1<IICT<<, »A«*IS,{"KIWiy 3ii^?r XBR? •UNCTI <»*<•<•—-^ ~ -H^ -2W 'ftreqin" aa^r'R; 1 fet^' •>*•<• WOHKWW ^ajtendftB fhese departmenT.s tecaiise the •r\^^ ~ ^ ^^•''^.^ Oovt.. jobs were i^ot avai1ab1e ;ifo|Kl.hem, They also contende<I that in case they are not aUocataleih the same State, itta —^"Ssti'Wf. , ''•^ i-;'':'^ ••'-i.^ not only inanpower but inay al^ "K» av result m criniinal waste of o create econoaiip crises aiid affisci fhe aatlbnal growth. pTfetr.cases'mgy also be ( considered. • 8. It is submitted tKat duran^ tlie uiterveiiingjperiod some persons have retired or nearing I±ie.ageofretirement, say this ycai' i.c. upto 31"'. Octobcr, 2CJ33. Thcy submit tliat thcir <;ases mav be coiisidered so itiai Ltiere is 110 diHiculiv iii apportionment ofretiral beneflq5 and they may get the saine at the earliest and may settle tl~|emselves in their home rov'n. Their cases ma\- also be considei-ed. 9. Ii is liu'tlicr submitted b\ Thar besirles ilie cases ot' snousei ^lie counse] fur thc petitioncr-s „ there are orher cases wlierc linai allocation neecls t'Lli-ther consicleration aiu c<»^w •--^A.r^ss'> XI-HC-22 'S^ -^WM^, »n)«<re,I«<-iwi< Sff^T 'VW IPKW n>><iq> ''8^. 200 ———-fa^jsr a^ •tani«»a <rf<&if^frf* N8il!R(<A <RKgK ^sffw^c^K •» ms'ideratinn and caregoriRs ^^.an, mutual cases, bonafu|^ l^<e mandage of parf-ies afier •t l^iresidence, non-calling of aption ete.'^Which have been ine •'••'S'r-<;\... 4tioned by fhe petitioners in |licir rcspecdvc pctitions. SISsS'i'yg'.;' ! ' "- j|l^^t,4s coiussoded thax ihere;. ;'iSS""% ', ?een married in between as their! id has taken place after tlie a] 'here ai'e few cases of this categ ;onsidcrcd. .tre- some persoos who have Imarriage was earJier settled jpomted day i.e. 1-11-2000. ^ry. Their cases inay also be jl 1. Il is pouiLcd OUL Uiai emplo'j f} - 'hllocaHon. it is submined Uiat 14 tinder t-tie provisions of scheme ^ laJlocatioiis have beeii consideiji ;es liave a]-)plied for iiiuiual utual allocation is possi1->le nd the few cases of mutna! 'd w-hereas cases of tlie t>etitioiicrs havc bccn rejected/n^ urtlicr submitt<:-i.l thai thc miitu. [md ma\' be consiclered and esp^ :he persons ai^plying ibr muiuai 4 >t properly considered.it is d adjustment is ^lermissiblc ciallv in T.hose cases whei-c llocation clo not disuirb ')';<- (<»*fert 6 .XI-HC-22 T«g•<ii<<i<iti, oTjltf'is, Riwwy an^yr 'weK N1WW Bl««I<*' "WT. 208 SH^ffW (i;1(»W^V fl>lff^tR?<* dii^aawwK-ytka t.Kfci'a-i wi+ffit fe'.a <ti<w ^^iPT^R^ff seniority or orheTwise affectinj there aFe.'pther categories of e t.lie Sl-ate excheqDPr. Tr. is rhar i}nployees like change of option after meoaaage. 12. It is contcnded l^iat certa^n •persons havc iiot been given place;QftheJis®©U?e- TB"ey ORS^for a.flartlciilar Staie but are ;% given anottier State aiid unctei be given the place of fheu' .1 reconsider in accordarice with! tlicy niay bc givcn thc placc ofl 13. Duiliig dictalioii, it i; I Manindiya Shrivastava, P. Diw| Shrivastava, Awadh Tripathi .the pollCT' they are entitled to ehoice. Theu- cases niav be tfae policy and if it is possible, thcu- choicc. also subiuilLed bv S/Sliri ikar, Prashant Mistira, Rajeev Sandeep Diibey and ?Smr. Haineeda Siddique tliat in the] theni where tlie employees bccausc of Tlic compclliiig circji 14. IT mav be noied ihat malt batch, there ai-e soine cases ol' have chonged their optioris imstaiiccs mcntioncd thcri-iii. iv of these mauers have been heai-cl on earlier dates. HOW(^ er, detallecl aj-gumenTs werr- (<»»^f^ .XI-HC-22 •S^ -<<1<IW<1, »fllwre,(«<«w>i< 3TT^9T 'qlra? *)<<wft"t wwS'? fW <l<i«tK. advancftd '^ 23-4-2003 but coi of the Co*M*Eand tt was stated the Sta.t^^chhattisgarh shri Advocatc ?^encral oftBtiState o M nor. be cnncliidRfl r.U1 rising that the Advocate Geiieral of Ravindra Shrivastava and the 3(fM.P. Shri V.K.Tankha would ;!aK::'': address 0<B^S|hal^^|^ielr ;re^peciive Staxes. Shri Munhy, tearned <^ tnsel for ttle Union cplndia was given tlme to seek •I definite te^truct:lons/^rom the D(i'ector (S.R.) concemed on tlie quesuon* raised especially it^'.tions said thc inattcii ffi.). 24-4-2003, tlierefoi) been li»i(/5(l accordlngty. ArgL(ments have been 'heard ar refeardiii extentio. 15. S t ii' Ravindra Shi-ivastav; tlic St/^?/ " 0{' ClihaT.t.isgai'h oni^ Advocsi''' 'Oencral oftlic Statc o^ ihe allo' /'i]tlon under ihe provisic} ACT 2""'' is concernecl, rhe po\^ ^rdiiig cbnsideration of the wcrc dii-cctcd to bc listcd foi :, batcli of tliese cascs liave , leai'ned Advocate GeneraJ or Shri V.K. Tailklm. leanK-ii M.P. subniif.tccl t.hat so fai a-^ ns ofrhe M.P. Reorgaiiisacion n' is vestecl witi-i the CenTi';'i [^»^ ^<t XJ-HC-22 ~T '^%IS8S3Ki-NN&:-:£®'s--'»S:'l/ .•^^.^•^^{StS-^^-^^K:-: •'•••'• '3^ "«wi,dtflwia, OWHIitl^*^ ^^S'xSs.Sr' ' """-1 's%^":: ,.1, ^.:' ',^;^^3.g^^^i^ .....^^,..,^....-\ '-^•ci^V^,v»i^l^S'^t^iSJSI^lSS^r 'IRRR ,. .1,,,,.,' <ff*WII<B*n<6 -- ' R4*<11" "~~wi.'Me •—~81^^^^K- -SS&!^S& ?;». sn^a^i Rt*tiq) 311^'ff St**fl<ftfl(^ <ffi^l TWBN< ^tftfl •^^s^ :• " ';-'. ieriw!n -qndfit^SiffiKSR ^ssft;tW ^ Cjovt.. and ^.he role of rl-ie rfi! aid aiid assist the Central' information. It is submitted do so as and whcn rcquii directed t)f thls Court. 16. So far as provisions R lipect.ive'Stere govemmRnts is to |Govt. and provide the'.teqiusite Ihat thev have done so and would ;d bv the Ccntral Oovt. or as lating to servicesiare concemect, 1 •"'. •--• • • sectkins 68, 69, 70, 71 afrd 72 are relevata|,and quoted below:- "68. Provisions rclatin to scrvicca in Ktadliva Pradcsh exist^ig and Chha.ttisgarh-(1) before Llie appouited.4ay the affairs offhe on and from that day connection with the Pradesh miless he is| order of the Ceuu-al in coiinection \vith ChhaTUsgai'n: Provided that no dirct secuoii at'ter t1ie expiit dav. (2) As soon as niav] CenTral GOVT. ShallJ determine the succes( i-eferrecl ro in sub-secli scivice sav\ llie dat^ |Ever^7 person who unmediately is serviiig iii coiniectjioii willi State ofMadhya Praesh shall, brovisionallv continue to sei-ve m laffairs of the State of Madhva required, by general or special Clovenuneni: to sei-ve provisioiiall\ the aifairs ofi the State of :tion shall be issued under Thi.s ; ol' one vear troin tl-ie appointed be after the appomted day, tlie b\- gene7-al or special order. •or State to which evei-y person on lll shall be finaliy aUotted Tor \\'ith effec-L from which sucli pBft^ftA XI-HC-22 ~r 9 'S^ •*ii<ii<n<l, S^HH^, llRirey SH^T TCT5R iiwu fiivw faih "v^, w» ' Ri*<t(' al^ff^l ^*ff<F*t^tI w<ra 'wviV »t(»qi<<fte wofowBi '«i<df4ft'<fl<ft*<i< ftPT^lAff (3) Every iperson whc| is fmally allotted under th^ provisions qf sub-sectio4"(2) to a successor State shall, if he is riot already sem4g tlierern be inade available for sei-ving in the successorjState from such date as may be agreed upon between th' 69-Provisions relatina Govemments concerned or in default of such agreeme^t, as may be determmed hy t1ie Central Goverrunent. other services-(l) Nothuig 'in ttiis si&ction:or section 64 shall be deemed to affeei on or after the appqinted dayfthe operation-ofttie provisions of Chapter I of Part XN ^! the Constitution in relation to ^nditions of service of persons 1-itl-i tlie afi'au's of tlie Union or detennination of the sei'vmg in connection anv State : Pi-ovided tliat the coiiditions of service applicable 'mimediately betbre the ^ppointed day in ttie case ot any persoii deeiued to liav^ bcen allocated tb tlie State ol Madhya Pradesh or to ijhe State of Chhattisgarh under Section 68 shall iiot t>e vaiied lo lus disadvaiitage except with the previou^ of the Cential Govemment. (2) All sei-vices prior to fhe appointed day rendered by a person- (a) if he is deen- State under section 68 renclered in conncction ed to have been allocated to anv shall be deemed to have hfpn wkh the aiTairs ofthat Statc; (b) if he is deemed t.o li^ve been allocated to the l.'iiiu!! ui connecnon \vn!\ | tl'ie' admuiisu'arion oi' rlie Cliliat.tisgarh sliall bc cjeenied to have been rendercd m coiuiecTioii wit1~i the a1'ttir<~ ot' The Union, foi thc IJUI'POSCS of thc j ules regulating his condirion-' of service. i,3i The provislons ot' t5ecTion 68. shall noi a]3pl\- in relation to members ol'bnv All India Sei'vice. 7<). Provisions as to (jontinuance ot' oflicers in sani':' l>o^t- (1) Eveiv i)erso(i who, immediatcly beloie il'ic fttWrt ''•'••••':^#!-^^ff:i^ XI.HC-2^ 10 T^ •<<i<ii<n<i, t»T(lti'ie,t'lMluy sn^ 'iR'g? *U<«CTI «>llw""""""""""""""""""""'(l^ 200 'ft;6^I" IMAlNW ftiM'K <t(I§<l ww<a mitn •timnnftn 11<H*S WRBtfiPd l(ilt(H ftwiflfcff connecttion appointed day is holdmg] post or 'office in existing State of Madhya that dav falls withln anyi continue to hold fhe successor State, and shal| day, to have been duly the Govemm.ent of, or in, ttiat guccessor State : Proyided fhat nbfhing in prevent a competent appointed day, from pass| aiiy order affecting the "office. 71. Advison' Committees- 11 bv order establish one or tlie puipose of assistuig it ii] (a) the dischai'ge of any of aiid (b) the ensuring of falr per^ons affected by the pro^er consideration of such persons. 72. Powei of Central Gover |or disch^rging dnties of an\ with the affairs of die pradesh in any area wluch on |of the. suecessor States shall ^ine post or oCElce in tiiat be deemed, on and froni that apjxiintcd to the post or office by asjy ofher appropriate authority this Section shaU be deemed to atithorit\r, on and from the [ng in relation to such person 'ontuiuance in such post or tie Central Govemment may, itore Advison? Committees tbr regard to- :s ftuictions under this Part; aldl fl' equitable ti-eatiueat to aU i-ovisions of this Parr and The u\v representations made by imciit to RJVC directions- Tiic CentraJ Governinenl may, gi'| Goveniineiit ot'Madli\a Pradf ol' Ghliat.t.isgai'h as inay app^c purpose of' giving ef't'pct To tlji Pait and tl'ie Steie Govfci'iutiicnt dh-ections." e such directions to flie State sh anct rhe Stare Govemnieni ll' t.0 it t.0 bc necessai'v for l!ie ' Toregolng provisions ol' tliis sliall coniply with sucli [<»^fw» XI-HC-22 11 TS9 '<<1<4W<<, wxil+i'ic, hwioy 3Ti^r iraq? tii^ii <h*ii<»> ~•R^ 200 ' R«><t(" dflinw fttiw oiiS* a>*ff*»w {•ffv«nsi< 'o wdwfl-i iw(ff4 Ri-^1 <Ri«ti< ^ 3(piw <d^<r 17. It is siihmit.ted liy Sliri M}irthy That There was process nf bifurcation of the State o^ M.P., therefore, the policy guidelines were franied sepajjate vide Annexures-R/1, R/2 and R/5. Statc of Chliattis; 1/11/2000. The Govemment cont'erreci under Section 71 o :ai-h canic iiito existence on of Iiidia in exercise of powers the M.P. Keorganization Act, .2000 coi-isdtuted a committ^e by order dated Jaiiuaiy l, 2001 under Chamnanship o^ gliri N.B. Lohaiii with other mciubcrs, wliicli is popularly i^iiowii as Lohaiii Coiuiuittcc. It is fui'llier subuiill.ed Lliat iilaLiers of allocaLioii of about 1,62,46 1 iemplovees of 9 L dep4 provisional allocations were n( irtmenr.s were dealt with. P'irst allocatioii. certaiii naines co Cenit.ra} Oov<-;n iirK'nT d<;;cide<i allocation iist. rovcring al iacle. Tn tl'ie. said provisional ild iiot fuid place. Tliei] the To inu-oduce a tentative tniti! pc-isonnel aiid Tcnt£iiivcl\ informing ihein 01 iheir prortosed allocauon T.O one or \nc oTher snccessor Sta'.e ancl invi ing representations t'ron] rhein ['fl*^^ XI-HC-22 W 12 'g^ •<II<<ICT<), WTftwi^, ('idiuy 3ff^?T 'qsra? iitni ai«<i<*"'~"": ~"~ Tff^. 200 'Ri<i<t(" SH^KI ftl^*flSi^t n>' tti»a F^t ^WWKWtQ nft< MOiwflt WWS4ft4 <R»<<n ^TaiFtwaaiiB against the same. Therefore, the representations liiefore'- These representations wer< dcpaitincnt and thcy wcrc conslderatipn and 4014 rep the claims of about 467! GoveiTiment considered fK 8692 aggt-ieved personnel madp jthe State Advisdry Cominittee. exainuied bv the concenicd Foi-ivardcd to tlic cominittcc foi rescntatlons were accepied and p were rejectecl. The C"entral [e request of State Advisoi-\ Coranaittee and decided to a|locate 219 excess optees, whose tod to tlic succcssor Statc of rcprcscnta.tions wcrc rcccii CliliaLlisgai'li, iii lieu of M.i commlftee. It is further subl 219 excess optees, 43 additict Cei^tral Governnient.. It is Covcniincnt lia& clonc its bd [licic i~- no prcjiK.licc against| 18. Siu'; MLirth',, appeai'ii'] ;ilal.ecl a-iKl suljiuittecl t'nA '. as rccouuueiided b\ llie salci aiitted tlTiat in addltlon to aliove nal cases were considercd 1n tlip Iso subinilted tliat tlie Ceiil.ral ?T liiider thc circuuisraiic.:'-. aitti anv pci-son. for the LInion ol' !ndia !';Mil\ t if the. rejjresentatioiis ajr [•*a^ftrt ^^ XI-HC-22 13 T53 •^IIIWI, axflwis, l«i<'ii«y 31I^?T xraq? IIHCTI ^pqjq;-—••——•—"—•••—"•""••••gs^ JQQ ' R«xiir"""""" 311^1'BI Riii,qi <H(3lo niNi^* wva ^TOfl »wq><•aftn M<ii«<niwnif'? ft<s <pwti< '^'fltFtit fliA<n dooimenrs and copy nf rhp siilimitted d)]1y siipported hy petitions and annexures flled,- 4-ie Central Govemment u'ould ^ consider fhe saiue afresh. It is subuiitted that the Policv wl-uch lias bccn framcd is afttr duc considcratioii aiid tlic represeniatlons will. be declded In accordance wiih the provisions of law and the polici^s traiiied. 19. It 1s conrended rhat f41r and equitable rreaimenr envlsages a decisio]'!, which s falr ancl equitable to all. decision of the Hon'l3le Apex Reliance ha.s been placed on a| Court in the case of State of' MJaliai-ashtra vs. Chandrakant, re]3orted.in AIR 1981 SC 1990. 20. Il is penuicnl tu nut.c tjliat Scctiuii 71 of tlic M.P. ReorgajiiizaTion ACT 2'..'!."! casis £ enslii'inef] iincler The sp.id Ad. equita.lilc treatnieiit to all i.iersc ol' Part VnII ancl The pro rcpreseiitalioiis uiai.lc bv sucli ^ c1ut\' on CenTi-aJ Cioverniiie.ni. Wliat is ensiirecl is fr'iir and ns affected bv the provisions 3er consicleration of un'. •rsoii. ll is lui tlie Cciitial [1»^^ w .'.^. l/i M-HC-22 T°? •qwiciq, »<(l'M'lis, f«<c11«1< 31T^?T Traq? NltCTI g^q)^---—•---•—--•-—•g^ ^^ "fa;6^tl" aii^n^i ftflt^t dtl^ Bt^t+^rf^I w^;<1 VWIWWfffl tlfti M<rftt4k*i flw^ 'ff fcsA ^Rn<i(n '^^lPtPlW^T GovfiTimRnt. To ensiire fair ^nd eqiiitahlR TrRatmenr tr> a11 persons affected by tlie releva|nLt provisions of the part VIII of thc M.P. Reorgaiiization consideration of any rcprcser Under the t'stcts aiid clrcuni observe that power of C-entrs merely by layuig down cr coiitinues till entire proces doubts rcsolvcd aiid all rcprc; 21. Haviiig thus considered the casc and in view of the s un bclialf of tlic pa^-tics, iil tl lUSTice will l.x" sc-i-ver! il' ai iieriTioners, tl'iose \\']\o re]iresentaTion ra-ising tlieir g on or liclore 10'r ^.1a\ 2(V>J( adLiicssctl to llic Oovcrniit |Act 2000 and the proper (tations made by such persons. tanCes xhis court would llke ro Ctovemment is not exhaustecl Itei-ia for final aUotment but is completed, all probleiiis, kiitations coiisidcrcd. the facts and circumstances oi Eatcnients inade bv thc coiinscl c opinion 01 tliis Cuuit., ciiU~' ')i ODi)0]'TuniT\^ is glvrn in !)-;< •sirp, T') make a (Ifiailcil •ievan.ces along \vith documenis lu the CeiiU-a] Governiiieiil •iit oi' liiilia. De])art.iuciit ul ['iftWrt '.•?%^i Xi-HC-22 15 ~3^ '<<l'41<*f1, BTflwis, (qftwy 3TI^?T 'CRW «imcnaittti '(^ 200 fts^K' oi^n^i ftli.q> •)(§« VflW^ «II<1 lAd ^WWl 9WW< «*ft? *t!4i<5P8i( 'OTCff'^lte'A <ft*t<.i< ^T ^fPcPt 4U^<f Personal and Trainuig, Minlistiy of Personal, Piiblic Qrievances aad Pensions, Lokn4L^ New Delhi (State Reorganizati. rcprcscntation duly gijipportcd sei-ved on iheaeoncemeddDepaititiehts iyak Bhawan, Khan Mai-ket, n Cell). Sanie copy of the by all docuiacnts bc also of both ihe Staies after aiid botli the States t.o obtataing Uie acknowledgemei^t fonvard the saiue 'to the Gentral Goveinment with theii commente and tlie requisite infoj witliin 30 days, in order to enab] decide the representation. It is seek si.ichi fm-ther mformatlon t and on such requisition beir Governiiienc; tlie State Govenif expeditiously. Oii such a rep'r CcnTi'al Govcrniiii-ni sl'iail consij' earlv as oossibie vrejeraoi^ on passing appropriaTe orciers. ination eaid coruplete details g tlic Ceiitral Goven-uiient to )peii to tlie Central Govt. tu •om the StaT.e (^overnmentK g made from the CRnTra.1 lenl.s \vili supp]\ the s.'uue sen'ia'don bein^ inacif-. ii^i lci anu decidc .t]~iC sanii- ;j~' >r bcibre jl»' .Juh'. 2L>'j3 b\ ['<t*WsR XI-HC-22 16 T^ «<i<im«<,»t(l«'i<o,t«ti'll(|ii< SV^fT WW «<i*wnWite" "R^. ano :!^ 'Bi»<y" »*tf<ft<* wSaiivt ftlfell*lfi<l FQ tt^i'^K*w< <u»a »WlwhlWBlf'<tt<d<ftlt<ll ^rvlPww^ff petitioners of^thDse cases ai^ 22. So<fer as the cases of njvtsed options are concemerl, the directed to specificaUy niention this faet^ tihie i-ep>Teseat:atio^i. Theu- representatkins shall be decidcd b^' the CcntralQovt. ^.s dirccted abovc- It is also madc GlearaSiat.ai on 1/8/2003 jto receive Goveram.eiit on. theu' repres^ntatioiis. loyees will remaln on dun' the decision of the Central 23. Counsel for the petiUo^iers submltted that pursuaiit TO interinis orders passed by tlT<a' Bar ma\' 1ie recorcled. it foLuid thai the petition.ers ihcv m&\ be given liliern anjilicatioii for inodiucation. :his Court, they have not lieen relieved and they are continjuing. This statenient is inade ai ;f the Bar bv the counsel {]3i- the peti.tioners and this i& rccurdcd. Counscl for thc 3t4.tc Hubuilttcd that tlici cuuld nu' veni\- abou' rlie iiiclivicluaj dases and rlie siaieiiieni iua(!t in sonie rases or T~np othpr, ii have inade incorrecl statemenl, tQ make a irien's.ici'i b\ iiiiisy: rriT.c slatciuci)t~~ ai'c rccordcii 'u\d A yv^ w^ "'f\V^^#wfl^ .* M-HC-22 "3'^ '^iiiw^, attlo'is, iiCTiwy 3H^9T 'WK WWIt <»><i<i>" "g^. 2oa SI^B'H ft^F. w*|y w 4>wf«4-<«ii]Rif*fft<i9<ftw< ^Sf^W wftfed the lihfrty i^Kgi^n to the S<ate, as.prayftd. Rsly-ing on .the statemeiKsgmade, it is directed that if the persons are not relieyed;j;hey^shaU;E(e>ti|!^EeIi du-ected that till thc ^iae;ci! :;SN»: |iN$SE lers stiil coQtmumg,^shaJ^^e aU •i '•>.•.-'••' who tiave been FeUeved.are f5- tliis fact in their represent; QovciTuucnt to pass suc Govenuueiil- deems fil. It- is Bved. In'the circumstances, it is I -"':'• • • • ••• •.'• |ion is givcn by the Ccnti-al ktio liave not been relleved and bwect to continue. So far those loncemed, Aey should mention Ittioii and it is for tlie Centi-al L ordcr which tlic Ccnti'al the re^iresentation would be tuade cleai- Lliai die declsioii on :ommui-iicated to the concemed departments, vvho after rece^ the employees concemed. Tt} / the i-espectivc- dcpartn'ients] scrvcd on thc pctitioncrs. 21. In rhe opinlon of ttiis ^ emulovees as \vell as the rf ring it wou1d communicate it TO dii'ectioiis ai'e beuig issi-ied 'o so that rhc decisioii taken is »un. ii is in tlie imeresr ot' tlie SDective yovernments that rli." p» rt <® ~-^- S'iitijs.. 18 • , 'XI-HC-22 T°? -qwKni, d'Atilld, i«<<<tyy 3T(^9T ^Tsra? „ -^^lWNltB~'"~'"'^'''-^'~"'~'~'-~3R^ 200 '(St*4»l"" S^BW ftt*^ft 39^8 SIKffq* WBQ Sff^l;^iWBUBfe ^«rf?l4l'RPRff^^td^ IOII^*tt ordcrs are implemRntRd, ailn^ations .are finali7^d anri rhe persons startworking, so thaifelentire inatter is finatized at tlie f. eaTUeat?and/ the resggct.ivB pi^^amusl should devote tiine in •fe'Wte:'- -•-^^•"^^S'K&iiBl^^ttS^y'11.' : ; ! ' • ' .VSW- i.SiSffSSSS'^K^-!' 'l perfbnning thcir dufiB^in.s6%tp oflitigating. , "fta<Sife :.-^iBa^y^,.:^^,-,,sB^.,^^^^iSi^^. , ^ .^ ^ .l-;,.i „,';;;.;;;.,,. , ., . 25. Itisi&adeIclearg£haf?^ s<%urthas<^)Uside ^ the mattcr on broad conK;nsus lu-rived at betwccn the partics and has iior CTpressed'anv ioplMon on the mertils or otfaerwise of the case and'it is left fof coiisideration of the Centi-al Qovemment. 26. With these observatibnsf these petitions are disposed of fuiallv. ' 27. Couscqucntly, M.W.P.s |G(> I.A.s, if anv, siand disposcd OI'. 28-- Before parting, this C}iTu-t appreciates T.he valual-ilp assisraiice rendered. by cou^isel for the peti.tion.ers, Shri Ravindra Shrivastava, Advoc^te General of' State of C.G aj'Kl Iiis coHcagucs, aiid Shii V.K. t'aiika. Advocatc aciicrai ofM.P. t^i^l a-HC-ii flw <nn "3^ -4l'i<l<~<<<, eitily'is, (•lclltiy ^(W v^ . *. ^' 'i'^f^i^y»^»^,^Hft?'yf-^^^..-::/^ ^ '^:^:S.^3:9^!^§^: ^' UJ •<iini a>«i^i £ a» •"""•"•"•~"~~~~^S^ft"""" and his colleagues, Shii VIV.S. Murthy, Addl. Standing ' ! aE&unsel for Unionoflndid, al^.ofwhoin^ssisted the Court in arriving broad consensus;in; X)crtificd copy toithc incorporation%?t;he aiosiKim^n^tc. ifidjreGted^earlier. ".•:;'.;:'';w:ai»^'K:^>^»;l-..'.-3i ';'^ (^^y't<?:1S^atte'lcoMse3?'^ Union of India free of costi Govemraents foriGompliaiice; ''^^^?^.^^^^^. '^y^^^S^s^-S^^ •l^^^^^^^S^^'''' <iii*.rtl-i|jii|tMgjGl^S|iBu{i< matter Uke tbis.! "^^JE^^^-^s^^.'.^^'^'. ''•. •: SsQsSS'W&'K:'yf^:^- ^ • :.' icfiQoners/thcir roounsel aftcr ^^^::^^^1^^^.^^^^^';" ti'3®elS;f§^»§IS;<30Unsel for 'or forroaniing Itito respectlve e