IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11844 of 2009 1. JAI PRAKASH MAHTO,son of Harihar Mahto 2. Sushila Devi,wife of Jai Prakash Mahto Both resident of village- Laxmipur,P.S.-Yogapatti,District-West Champaran. 3.Hiralal Mahto @ Harilal Mahto,son of late Kamal Mahto,resident of village- Harpurawa,P.S.-Yogapatti,District-West Champaran. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 18-04-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there was dispute in between the complainant and rest of her parents’ family members. Her sister’s daughter disappeared in the night and after few days her dead body was recovered. According to the learned counsel, only suspicion is cast against the petitioners, which was thoroughly investigated by the Investigating Officer, who submitted final form showing false implication of the petitioners, even then on protest cognizance has been taken and petitioners are apprehending their arrest, which in no case can be justified. I agree with same. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case No.1820C/2008, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )