WP(C)No. 8485/207 Page 1 of 8 $~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 20th October, 2010 + W.P.(C) 8485/2007 UNION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.B.K.Berera, Advocate. Versus RAM SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Shrigopal Aggarwal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL 1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. (Oral) 1. Though the decision impugned before us is a little hazy, but the conclusion arrived at is legally correct. 2. The ACP scheme applicable requires a financial upgradation to either the scale of pay in the promotional post immediately above and if there is no promotional post, in the pay-scale immediately above. 3. It is not in dispute that the respondent was employed as a Library Clerk and was deputed to serve in the Department of Agricultural and Cooperation, which is under the direct supervision and control of the Ministry of Agriculture, in fact, is a WP(C)No. 8485/207 Page 2 of 8 Department of the said Ministry. The pay-scale in which respondent was placed was S-5 i.e. `3,050-4,590. It is also not in dispute that the next above pay-scale i.e. S-6 was `3,200- 4,900. It is also not in dispute that no post of Library & Information Assistant existed in the Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, but said post existed in other Ministries as also other departments of the Ministry of Agriculture. It is also not in dispute that the pay-scale of Library & Information Assistant was in the pay-scale of `5000-8000. It is also not in dispute that the respondent became entitled to financial upgradation and treating the post of a Library Clerk as an isolation post, the department upgraded his pay in the scale `3,200-4900. 4. The respondent claimed that the post of Library & Information Assistant was the next above post and thus he was entitled to be upgraded in the scale `5000-8000. 5. Vide impugned decision the Tribunal has held that the post of Library Clerk was not an isolation post and thus it has directed the petitioner to grant upgradation to the respondent in the pay-scale `5000-8000. 6. Since the Tribunal has not noted the relevant clarificatory office memorandums issued, which in our opinion do not warrant any exercise to be carried out to determine whether the post in question held by the respondent was an isolation post or not, we do not reflect upon the reasoning of the Tribunal. 7. Vide OM No.35034/1/97-Estt.(D) dated 10.2.2000, the Department of Personnel & Training issued clarification on 58 points pertaining to the implementation of the Assured Career Progression Scheme for the Central Government Civilian Employees. Point of Doubt No.32 and its clarification read as under:- WP(C)No. 8485/207 Page 3 of 8 Sl.No. Point of Doubt Clarification 32. Where the cadres/hierarchy is limited to two grades only, what should be the pay scale for grant of second upgradation under ACPs? Such a cadre/hierarchy shall not fall in the isolated category as defined at S.No.31 above. Hence, the standard/common pay scales mentioned in Annexure-II of the Office Memorandum, dated 9-8-1999 shall not be applicable in such cases. Action in such cases may, therefore, be taken as per following clarifications:- (i) If such cadre/hierarchy exists in the Ministry/Department concerned, the second upgradation may be allowed in keeping with the pay scale of an analogous grade of a cadre/post in the same Ministry/Department. However, if no such grade exists in the Ministry/Department concerned, comparison may be made with an analogous grade available in other Ministries/Departments. (ii) In the case of Attached/ Subordinate Offices, the second upgradation under ACPs may be given in keeping with the pay scale of an analogous grade of a cadre/post of the concerned office. However, if no such cadre/post exists in the concerned office, comparison may be made with an analogous grade available in other Attached/ Subordinate offices of the Ministry/ Department concerned. 8. Relevant would it be to note that the clarification WP(C)No. 8485/207 Page 4 of 8 issued makes it clear that if a higher post does not exist in a Ministry/Department concerned, comparison may be made with an analogous grade available in other Ministries/Departments. The reason is obvious. There cannot be discrimination between similarly situated Central Government Employees doing the same job but posted in different Ministries/Departments of the Government. 9. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that the post of Library & Information Assistant exists under the Government of India and many persons are working in the different Ministries and Departments of the Government of India as Library & Information Assistant. Counsel also does not dispute that in many departments under the Ministry of Agriculture the said post exists. 10. Thus, in terms of the OM afore-noted the inevitable conclusion is that the respondent would be entitled to pay in the scale `5000-8000. 11. But, we need to write a little more, for the reason, learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon clarification at Serial No.53 of the Point of Doubt raised and the clarification issued. The same reads as under:- Sl.No. Point of Doubt Clarification 53. If for promotion on regular basis, an employee has to possess a higher/additional qualification, will it be necessary to insist on possession of these qualifications even while considering grant of financial upgradation under the ACPs? In terms of Condition No.6 of Annexure-I to DoP&T, O.M., dated 9-8-1999, only those employees who fulfil all promotional norms are eligible to be considered for benefit under ACPs. Therefore, various stipulations and conditions specified in the Recruitment Rules for promotion to the next higher grade, including the higher/additional qualification, if prescribed, would need to be met even for consideration under WP(C)No. 8485/207 Page 5 of 8 ACPs. 12. Drawing our attention to the Model Recruitment Rules for the post of Library & Information Assistant, learned counsel points out that vide Serial No.8 of the Recruitment Rule, it is mandatory for the candidate to possess a Degree in Library Science from a recognized University or equivalent. It is urged that admittedly the respondent does not possess said degree. Thus, we need to note the applicable Recruitment Rule. It reads as under:- MODEL RECRUITMENT RULES FOR THE POST OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION ASSTT. IN THE SCALE OF Rs.1400-40- 1600-50-2300-EB-60-2600 IN THE MINISTRIES/DEPARTMENTS/U.Ts. 1.Name of Post LIBRARY & INFORMATION ASSISTANT 2.No. of posts * (Year of framing) * subject to variation dependent on workload 3.Classification General Central Service (Group C) Non-Gazetted, Non-Ministerial. 4.Scale of Pay Rs.1400-40-1600-50-2300-EB-60-2600 5.Whether selection post or non- selection post Non Selection 6.Whether benefit of added years of service admissible under rule 30 of the CCS (Pension) Rules 1972 Not applicable. 7.Age limit for direct recruits Not applicable - in case promotion is the only method of recruitment. If direct recruitment is a method of recruitment the following may be inserted. “Not exceeding 28 years”. Relaxable upto 40 years (upto 45 years in respect of SC/ST candidates) in case of Govt. Servants in accordance wit the instructions or orders issued by the Central Govt. Note 1 - The crucial date for determining the age limit shall be as advertised by Staff Selection WP(C)No. 8485/207 Page 6 of 8 Commission (In case the direct recruitment is not done through SSC the following note may be inserted). Note 2 – The crucial date for determining the age limit shall be the closing date for receipt of applications from candidates in India (and not the closing date prescribed for those in Assam, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, Mijoram, Manipur, Nagaland, Tripura, Sikkim, Ladakh Division of J&K State, Lahaul & Spiti districts and Pangi Sub Division of Chamba district of Himachal Pradesh, Andaman & Nicobar Islands of Lakshadweep). 8. Educational & other qualifications required for direct recruits Not Applicable – In case direct recruitment is not a method of recruitment. In case direct recruitment is method of recruitment, the following provision may be kept:- Essential (1) Degree of a recognized university or equivalent (2) A Degree in Library Science from a recognized university or equivalent; Note :- Qualifications are relaxable at the discretion of the SSC/competent authority in case of candidates otherwise well qualified. 9. Whether age & educational qualifications prescribed for direct recruits will apply in the case of promotes. Not Applicable. 10. Period of probation, if any 2 years for direct recruits ; Nil for promotes. 11. Method of recruitment whether by direct recruitment or by promotion or by deputation and percentage of the vacancies to be filled by various methods. Any one of the following methods of recruitment:- (1) Promotion, failing which by transfer on deputation; (2) __________ percentage by promotion, failing which by transfer on deputation, and ____________ percentage by direct recruitment; (3) Direct recruitment. (In case direct recruitment is the only method of recruitment, WP(C)No. 8485/207 Page 7 of 8 the following note may be inserted). Note:- Vacancies caused by the incumbent being away on transfer on deputation or long leave or study leave or under other circumstances for a duration of one year or more may be filled on transfer on deputation from the officials of the Central Govt. holding analogous posts on regular basis and possessing the qualifications prescribed for direct recruits under column 8. Note :- the percentage for promotion or direct recruitment may be fixed taking into account the number of sanctioned posts in the feeder grade. For example if there are 5 posts in the feeder grade and 10 posts in the higher grade, only 50% quota may be prescribed for promotion, and 50% may be earmarked for direct recruitment. 13. Suffice would it be to state that as per the Recruitment Rule, method of recruitment to the post of Library & Information Assistant stipulates three modes; the ones usually found: (i) Promotion, (ii) Deputation and (iii) Direct Recruitment. Vide Serial No.8 of the Recruitment Rule applicable, essential educational qualification pertains only to a direct recruit. It is thus apparent that if the post has to be filled by promotion, there is no minimum educational qualification prescribed. 14. Point No.53 of the Point of Doubts posed and the clarification thereto makes it clear that employees who fulfill all promotional norms are eligible to be considered to benefit under ACP. Thus, the argument of learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondent did not fulfill the requisite educational qualification as prescribed by column at Serial No.8 of the Recruitment Rules is completely misplaced inasmuch as the said column relates to direct recruitment. 15. As per OM No.35034/1/97-Estt.(D) dated 9.8.1999, WP(C)No. 8485/207 Page 8 of 8 preceding the clarifications issued as per OM dated 10.2.2000, are stipulated conditions for grant of benefits under the ACP Scheme and vide Clause 6 thereof it is provided as under:- “6. Fulfilment of normal promotion norms (benchmark, departmental examination, seniority-cum-fitness in the case of Group „D‟ employees, etc.) for grant of financial upgradations, performance of such duties as are entrusted to the employees together with retention of old designations, financial upgradations as personal to the incumbent for the stated purposes and restriction of the ACP Scheme for financial and certain other benefits (House Building Advance, allotment of Government accommodation, advances, etc.) only without conferring any privileges related to higher status (e.g., invitation to ceremonial functions, deputation to higher posts, etc.) shall be ensured for grant of benefits under the ACP Scheme;” 16. There is thus no scope to urge any argument with reference to the respondents eligibility for ACP upgradation to be reckoned with reference to the essential educational qualifications prescribed for the post of Library & Information Assistant with reference to a direct recruitment. 17. The writ petition is dismissed. 18. No costs. (PRADEEP NANDRAJOG) JUDGE (SIDDHARTH MRIDUL) JUDGE OCTOBER 20, 2010 rk/dk