1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY : AURANGABAD BENCH 15. CA/6230/2009 In FAST/8469/2009 WITH CA/6232/2009 In FAST/8456/2009 WITH CA/6233/2009 In FAST/8475/2009 WITH CA/6234/2009 In FAST/8472/2009 WITH CA/6235/2009 In FAST/8465/2009 WITH CA/6236/2009 In FAST/8463/2009 WITH CA/6237/2009 In FAST/8448/2009 WITH CA/6238/2009 In FAST/8444/2009 WITH CA/6239/2009 In FAST/8446/2009 2 Kerba s/o. Tukaram Bedade - - - Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra and others.- - Respondents Shri R. K. Ashtekar, Advocate for applicant in all civil applications. Shri S. K. Tambe, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1. Shri Alok Sharma, Asstt. Solicitor General for respondent No.2. CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. Dated : 6th August 2009 PER COURT : 1 These are applications for condonation of delay. The applications are vehemently opposed by Shri Alok Sharma, learned Asstt. Solicitor General and learned A.G.P. Shri Tambe on the ground that delay has not been properly explained. 2. However, taking into consideration the delay which is only of 20 days and the reasons given by the applicants that the applicants have not received any amount of compensation and, therefore, they were required to make arrangements for collecting the amount to pay Court fees and for legal expenses is found to be just and 3 sufficient. 3. Applications are allowed. Delay is, therefore, condoned. ( N.D.DESHPANDE, J. ) ( B. R. GAVAI, J. ) pnk/ca632009