IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3648 of 2011 1. MD. MOIEEM @ CHHOTKU MIAN 2. RANJEET SAH @ RANJEET KUMAR SAH. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 24.05.2011 Heard both sides. Petitioners pray for anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Section 364/120B of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that with regard to an occurrence that allegedly took place on 5.10.2009, initially a complaint was lodged on 22.10.2009 which was later treated as an F.I.R.. It is submitted that the victim, few months after the institution of F.I.R. appeared suo motu. It is the submission of the petitioners that due to previous animosity respecting transaction of money, the present prosecution has been launched which is still pending investigation. Learned A.P.P., on perusal of the case diary, does not dispute the aforesaid submission. Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, this Court disposes of the application by the following order: Let the petitioners abovenamed surrender within four weeks in the Court below whereafter they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa 2 in connection with Bihra P.S. Case No. 13 of 2010 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further condition that one of the bailors in each case shall be own close family member of the petitioners. The said privilege granted to the petitioners is confined to the period of investigation only. In the event, the petitioners require bail after conclusion of investigation, they may surrender and pray for bail in the Court below which shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J)