Crl. Misc. No. M-10787 of 2011 (O&M) {1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-10787 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 24.05.2011 Hardeep Kaur ......Petitioner versus State Of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr. Narinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Raghbir Chaudhary, Sr. DAG, Punjab **** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) The petitioner has sought directions to respondent Nos. 1 and 2 under Section 482 Cr.P.C to transfer the investigation of F.I.R No. 10 dated 20.01.2011, registered at Police Station (Sadar) Rajpura, District Patiala to Vigilance/CID or to any Senior Gazetted Police Officer posted at Delhi. The main grievance of the petitioner is that petitioner was badly beaten up by accused person on 25.09.2010 at about 10 P.M. The petitioner informed her parents on telephone and when they along with brothers of the petitioner reached to get the matter settled, the accused persons attacked them and insisted that the Crl. Misc. No. M-10787 of 2011 (O&M) {2} petitioner would be allowed to live in their house only if their demand of car or cash will be met. The petitioner was thereafter thrown out of the house and the petitioner reached her parental house along with her parents and her brothers at Rajpura. On 28.09.2010, the petitioner submitted an application to S.S.P Patiala for taking legal action against the accused persons who demanded car or cash and other dowry articles from the petitioner and regarding beatings given by them to the petitioner. After enquiry, FIR No. 10 dated 20.01.2011 was got registered at Police Station (Sadar) Rajpura. On notice, a reply has been filed by respondent Nos. 1 to 3. As per reply, the investigation has been carried out and the petitioner has been granted anticipatory bail and he was directed to join the investigation on 17.05.2011 and the matter was relegated to Mediation and Conciliation Centre on 19.05.2011. The petitioner has also agreed to return the gold ornaments while granting anticipatory bail. Since the respondent has joined the investigation, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. (RITU BAHRI) JUDGE May 24, 2011 G.Arora