1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 474/2008 (Barkat Ali Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 15/2/2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. R.K.Charan for the petitioner. Mr. L.R.Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that co- accused Kailash and Natwar Singh @ Nattu have been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 18.9.2007. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in the Puchhatach Note of the co- accused, they stated that the illicit liquor is belonging to the petitioner. Be that as it may, at the time of recovery, the petitioner was not present as stated by learned counsel for the petitioner. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Barkat Ali S/o Shahmat Ali be 2 released on bail in FIR No. 136/2007 P.S. Shambhupura, district Chittorgarh, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP