IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 31ST MAY 2007 / 10TH JYAISHTA 1929 RP.No. 693 of 2004(H) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.21703/2004 Dated 29/07/2004 .................... REVISION PETITIONER/3RD RESPONDENT. ---------------------------------------------------- HEAD LOAD WORKERS UNION (SKU) REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PERAMBRA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.MOHANAN V.T.K. SRI.M.M.RAJEEVAN RESPONDENTS: PETITIONERS ------------------------ 1. K.V.BASHEER, PROPRIETOR, AKASH TRADING COMPANY, NEAR BUS STAND, PERAMBRA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. M.K.ABDUL RAHIMAN, PROPRIETOR, M.K.TRADERS, NEAR FISH MARKET, PERAMBRA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. SOBHANA VALLI, PROPRIETOR, MAHIMA RAVA STORES, OPPO.FISH MARKET, PERAMBRA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 4. E.SHAJITH, PROPRIETOR, V.K.TRADERS, NEAR FISH MARKET, PERAMBRA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERAMBRA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. : 2 : RP 693/04 6. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERAMBRA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 7. HEAD LOAD WORKERS UNION(CITU), REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PERAMBRA, KOZHIKODE DIST. 8. HEAD LOAD WORKERS UNION(BMS) REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,PERMBRA, KOZHIKODE DIST. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR FOR R1 TO R4 SRI.K.P.SUDHEER GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BENNY GERVASIS FOR R5 & R6 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/05/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.S.Radhakrishnan & Antony Dominic, JJ. ======================== R.P.No.693 of 2004 ======================== Dated this the 31st day of May, 2007. ORDER Radhakrishnan,J. In the grounds of the review petition, it is stated that there is no dispute pending before the Labour Officer. Therefore, the direction given by this court that the parties would be bound by the decision to be taken by the Labour Officer is not correct. Since no dispute is pending before the Labour Officer, there is no question of resolving the dispute by the Labour Officer. In case any dispute is raised before the Labour Officer, the parties would be bound by that decision unless it is set aside by a competent forum. Review Petition is disposed of as above. K.S.Radhakrishnan, Judge. Antony Dominic, Judge. ess 31/5