IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.46319 of 2008 Zahir @ Zahir Ansari Versus State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- Lawyer for Petitioner- Mr. U. S. Verma- Advocate. Lawyer for State- Mrs. Indu Bala Pandey- A.P.P. --------------------------- 02. 12.08.2011 This is an application for quashing the order taking cognizance dated 18.2.2006 by which the learned S.D.J.M., Raxaul took cognizance against the accused persons under sections 323, 341,427,435, 304 and 504 of the I.P.C. in Ramgarhwa P. S. Case No.25 of 2004 arising out of Tr. No.1314 of 2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Injuries are caused by lathi, danda or iron rod inflicting simple injuries though one of them on head, but never constituting any offence under section 307 of the I.P.C. So, I find no illegality committed by the trial court in taking cognizance for the offence under section 323 only for assault. Accordingly, this quashing application is hereby dismissed. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)