IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2010 / 28TH JYAISTHA 1932 RSA.No. 1164 of 2006() ---------------------- AS.146/2001 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,NORTH PARAVUR OS.398/1995 of MUNSIFF'S COURT,ALUVA .................... APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT: ------------------------------------------------------------- RAJARAJESWARI KUNJAMMA, AGED 57, D/O. KUNJIPILLA KUNJAMMA, KALATHIL LAKSHMIPURAM KOTTAYIL, EDATHALA KARA, ALUVA VILLAGE. BY ADVS. SRI.P.N.RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR, SRI.P.VISWANATHAN, SRI.G.JAYASANKAR, SRI.AJU MATHEW. RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: ----------------------------------------------------------------- PONNUMANI KUNJAMMA, AGED 62, D/O. KUNJIPILLA KUNJAMMA, KALATHIL LAKSHMIPURAM KOTTAYIL, EDATHALA KARA, ALUVA VILLAGE. BY ADVS. SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH, SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU, SRI.JAGAN GEORGE. THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P.BHAVADASAN, J. ------------------------------------- RSA No.1164 of 2006 ------------------------------------- Dated 18th June 2010 Judgment When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel on both sides submitted that the matter has been compromised and a compromise petition has been filed along with a plan. It is, therefore, prayed that a decree may be passed in terms of the compromise. 2. On going through the compromise, it is found to be in order and there is no reason as to why it should be rejected. In the result, the compromise is accepted. The Judgments and decrees of the courts below are set aside and a decree is passed in terms of the compromise. The compromise petition and plan shall form part of the decree. P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sta