(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1557 of 2006 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.795 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income-tax Mumbai ..Appellant Vs. Smt. Pratima H. Mehta..............Respondent Mr.B.M. Chatterji with Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 23rd October, 2007 DATED: 23rd October, 2007 DATED: 23rd October, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Though the respondents served there is no appearance. There is delay of 279 days. There is an affidavit of S.R.Veer showing cause as to why there was delay in preferring the Appeal. The tax incidence is more than Rs.20.00 lakhs. As the averments in the affidavit in support of the Motion are not contested the cause shown in our opinion amounts sufficient cause. Hence delay condoned. Motion made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to register the Appeal. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)