RSA No.1810 of 2009 (O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... RSA No.1810 of 2009(O&M) Decided on : April 30, 2009 Shiv Glass Company ... Appellant VERSUS Smt.Pushpa Gupta ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Bhag Singh, Advocate for the appellant. A.N.JINDAL, J.- For the reasons stated in CM No.5334-C of 2009, the delay of 50 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. RSA No.1810/2009 : The issue revolves around the location of the shop in dispute, whether it was situated within Municipal Limits of Ambala Cantt or outside and is within the revenue estate of village Babyal. Heard. The Trial Court as well as the lower Appellate Court have concurrently found that the shop was not situated within the revenue estate of Municipal Limits, Ambala Cantt and was situated within the revenue estate of village Babyal. The admission by the defendant / RSA No.1810 of 2009 (O&M) [ 2 ] appellant regarding service of notice Ex.PW2/B and also his signatures on acknowledgment Ex.PW2/D, certainly prove the case of the plaintiff / respondent that notice terminating tenancy of respondent was properly served. Thus, the provisions of the Rent Act being not attracted to the premises in dispute and tenancy being validly terminated, no fault could be found with the concurrent finding recorded by both the courts below. Dismissed. April 27, 2009 ( A.N.JINDAL ) `gian' JUDGE