.^Jy-^^.^=>—, IN THE HIGH COURT QF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR_[C^J WRIT PETITION FC1 N0 £2?7 72007 PETITIONER L\^^- •^^•y"^ ....-&M^-""" ..•-"''.t^r^y'" 'i^-'" ^Vv^'/li-y' Ramnath Yadav S/o Late Shri LaxjnaQ^Yadav Aged about 2}^t years Both resident'o'f Ramdas Nagar, Tikrapara, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 0<-^i?^' .^ VERSUS ^l 1. Union oflndia Through Secretary Deartment of Postal Services New Delhi 2. Post Master Director General, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ..•'.^0'„ \y \.^'~' 3- senlor Divisional Small Saving y ^l.^ Officer, Office of Collector (Small Savings), Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4. Superintendent of Post Office, Head Post Office, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5. Smt. Pooja O'Connor Wife of Shri L.M. O'Connor, Satya Sadan, Dipupara, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION QFJNDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPRQPRIATE WRIT IN THE" ^ATUREOF MANDAMUS- CERTIQRARI AND^QRISSUANOTOF OTHER SUITABLE WRITS. DIRECTJON OR DIRECTIQNS, ORDER OR ORDERS ~ sss-wB.i \ ^ ^^^^ii^^^'^^^^^.^S;;^^^^^^ ?••"——ln».^B! JeS^tBsi.eaL ,.f •1. \^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cl N0.5299 OT 2007 Petttioner Ramnath Yadav Versus Respondents Unionof India & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Harsh Wardhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri hteishif Shakeel, standing counsel for the Union of India/respondent No. 1, 2 & 4. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on 06th day of September, 2010) 1. Shri Shakeet, learned counsel appearing for the Union of India/ respondent No. 1, 2& 4 on the basis of avennents made in the return submits that duplicate pass-book was prepared on 19/08/2007 and the same has been handed over to the petitioner on 25/02/2008, thus, nothing remains in this petition for adjudication and the same has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner coneurs with the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1, 2 & 4. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gowri