IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10579 of 2010 1. RAM HOSHIYAR SINGH, S/O LATE GANGA DEO SINGH, R/O VILLAGE AND P.O. BHITHI SAHABUDDIN, P.S. BANIYAPUR, DISTRICT-SARAN. Versus 1. HARIHAR PD. SINGH, S/O GANGA DEO SINGH, R/O VILLAGE AND P.O. BHITTHI SAHABUDDIN, P.S. BANIYAPUR,DISTRICT- SARAN. 2. PHULIYA DEVI, W/O MOHAN RAI, R/O VILLAGE AND P.O. BHITTHI SAHABUDDIN, P.S. BENIYAPUR,DISTRICT- SARAN. 3. MOSMAT PHULIYA KUER, D/O LATE GANGA DEO SINGH AND W/O KAMESHWAR PANDEY, R/O VILLAGE AND P.O. TARWAR, P.S. BHELDI, DISTRICT- SARAN. ----------- 2/ 13/01/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The submission is that the recitals in the order dated 1.5.2010 with regard to the conduct of the petitioner with reference to dates and for which reason he has been denied leave to defend is contrary to the records of the case itself pending before the Court concerned and therefore the impugned order is at variance with the materials already available on record. The recitals in an order of a Court from the records are sacrosanct. If the order contains an error of fact at variance with the records, the petitioner is at liberty to first draw the attention of the Court concerned to the errors in the order-sheet vis-à-vis the records. There is no occasion for this Court to consider the order at this stage. The writ application is disposed with the aforesaid observations. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)