1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.143 of 2009 (S/B) Veer Singh ….…Petitioner Versus State of Uttaranchal & others …..Respondents Shri C.D. Bahuguna, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri K.P. Upadhayay, Addl. C.S.C. for the State. Dated: 27th December, 2010 Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Barin Ghosh, C.J. (Oral) In have decided almost a similar matter in writ petition no. 147 of 2009 (S/B). In the instant case too, petitioner was working at one DRDA. He was transferred to another DRDA. He accepted the transfer and later when he was transferred from that DRDA to yet another DRDA , he filed a writ petition. For the reasons, as recorded in the order passed by us in writ petition no. 147 of 2009 (S/B), we also dismiss this writ petition after vacating the interim order, if any. (V.K.Bist, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 27.12.2010 27.12.2010 Arti