IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.16877 of 2011 Date of Decision.12.09.2011 Bhanu Partap son of Tara Chand resident of Rampur road Haily Mandi Pataudi, Tehsil Pataudi, District Gurgaon .....Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana through the Commissioner cum Secretary, Government of Haryana, Civil Secretariat at Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Neeraj Gaur, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. There is no cause of action for the writ petition, since the petition for eviction on the ground of non-payment of rent under the Public Premises Act by the respondents has been disposed of by the Sub Divisional Officer saying that the parties shall enter into new terms and he has adjourned the case sine die since no action will be taken unless new terms have been introduced. 2. There has been no such attempt to secure new terms and there is no particular precipitate action that the respondents have taken against the petitioner to approach this Court for any relief. 3. The writ petition is filed without any cause of action and it is dismissed as such. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 12, 2011 Pankaj*