IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc.-M No.11792 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision : 23.08.2011 Surjit Singh and another ... Petitioners versus State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, DAG, Punjab. Mr. J.S. Dadwal, Advocate for the complainant. **** Rajesh Bindal, J Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioner No.1 is grand father and petitioner No.2 is real brother of the complainant. There was fight on account of partition of the family property. No injury has been suffered by the complainant, however, the matter in dispute has now been amicably settled. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant admitted the factum of compromise between the parties. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering their relation, I am of the opinion that the petitioners deserve concession of pre arrest bail. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer on 05.09.2011 at 10.00 A.M. to join investigation and in case of arrest, they shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/ Investigating Officer. They shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for further investigation. Crl. Misc.-M No.11792 of 2011(O&M) -2- They shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) Cr.PC. The petition stands disposed of. August 23, 2011 (Rajesh Bindal) sonia Judge