yiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITiON (S) No. 342S of 2007 PETITIONERS 1. Baldev Taram, ^ed about 44 years, S/o. Late Shri Dharam Singh Taram, Assistant Teacher, Middle Schooi, Mayana, Charama, Kanker 2. Smt. Yashoda Nevra, Aged about 41 years, W/o. Shri Bhuneshwar Prasad Nevra, Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Puri, Charama Kaner. 3. Ramesh Kumar Tandiya, Aged about 37 years, S/o. Samaru Ram Tandiya, Assistant Teacher, Primary Schoot, Chinauri, Charama, Kanker 4. Ram Kumar Gota, Aged about 37 years, S/o. Shri Fagu Ram Gota, Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Puri, Charama, Kanker All are at Block Charama, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^- 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Schoo! Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. The Director, Public Instruction, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer, Kanker District Kanker (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Charama, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) 5. Treasury & Funds Department, Kanker WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA SingleBench : Hon'bteMr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Mr. D.N. Prajapati, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel lawyerforthe respondents/State. Karuna ORDER (Passed on 22ml day ofJune, 2007) 1. The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment orfrom the cfate ofcompletion ofprobation period. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petttioners as welt as for the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in W.P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), which was allowed vide orderdated 7.11.2006. 3. In view of the above-stated submissions made by tearned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. -_ Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotn Judge