IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.43 OF 2010 Avinash Sudam Gosavi .. Appellant Versus Shikshan Prasarak Mandal & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Pankaj Deokar for appellant Ms.Payal Sarda for respondent No.1 Mr.Patne, AGP for State CORAM : ANIL R. DAVE, C.J. & S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 2nd March 2010. P.C.: 1] Being aggrieved by an order dated 4th September 2007 passed in Writ Petition No.9401 of 2007 this LPA is filed. 2] The case of the petitioner appellant before the learned single Judge was that his service was wrongly terminated by the respondent school. According to the appellant, he was appointed and working as a Peon in the school. 3] Upon hearing the learned Advocates and looking to the impugned order as well as the order passed by the School Tribunal, it is clear that certain documents, which were not genuine, had been placed on record by the appellant – Petitioner. According to the case of the respondent school, the appellant was appointed as a daily wager and no regular appointment was ever given to him. The Authorities below have come to a conclusion that the appointment order which was placed on record was fake. 4] Looking to all these facts and in view of the finding to the effect that the appellant was never given regular appointment as a Peon, the petition was rejected by the learned Single Judge. We are in agreement with the view expressed by the learned Single Judge. Therefore the appeal is dismissed. No orders as to costs. (CHIEF JUSTICE) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)