IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No. 276 of 2011 Decided on: 6.9.2011 _______________________________________________________________________ Punnu Ram ...Appellant Versus Amarjeet and others ...Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the appellant: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Naveen Awasthi, Advocate . vice Mr. Vikram Thakur, Advocate . for respondents No. 1, 2, 5 and 7. . . Mr. Yudhvir Singh, Advocate, for . respondent No. 6. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. G.R. Palsra, learned counsel for the appellant brought to the notice of the Court that in view of the judgment dated 21.3.2011, rendered by this Court in RSA No. 77 of 1998, the present Regular Second Appeal does not survive. Consequently, the present appeal is disposed of. 2. However, the liberty is reserved to the parties to pursue the remedies in accordance with law in appropriate forum. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge September 6, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?