In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-8995 of 2009 (O&M) Jitender ..... Petitioner vs The State of Haryana ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Rajender Sorout, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mrs. Ritu Punj, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. On 31.3.2009, the following order was passed:- “Counsel for the petitioner submits that initially the FIR was registered under Sections 323, 324, 506 of the Indian Penal code. The petitioner and his co-accused were released on regular bail. Section 326 of the IPC was added later on and, therefore, the petitioner is sought to be arrested once again. It is further argued that in the FIR, no injury has been attributed to the petitioner as he is alleged to have pulled the injured from the tractor. The grievous injury is attributed to Sunil. The Additional Sessions Judge has wrongly held that this injury is attributed to the petitioner.” It is not disputed that the petitioner has already joined investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required. The grievous injury is attributed to Sunil who has been declared as Proclaimed Offender. Be that as it may, without recording any finding on the merits of the controversy, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 31.3.2009 is made absolute. The petition is disposed of. 12.8.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge