IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY MONDAY, THE 14TH MARCH 2011 / 23RD PHALGUNA 1932 WA.No. 236 of 2011 ---------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.14790/2010 DATED 26/11/2010] .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C).NO. 14790/2010: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- V.A.THOMAS, VARIYATH HOUSE, MALIPPURAM.P.O., VALAPPU, NEAR JANATHA SAW MILL, ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS. SRI.K.RAVEENDRAN, SRI.P.K.ABDUL RAHIMAN. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN W.P.(C).NO. 14790/2010: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 001. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VAIDHYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 001. 3. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, SUB STATION, MALIPURAM, VYPIN,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT – 682 511. 4. THE CHIEF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 001. 5. POULOSE, MALIYEKKAL VEEDU, PROPRIETOR, JANATHA SAW MILL, VALAPPU, ERNAKULAM – 682 511. 6. DENNY POULOSE, MALIYEKKAL VEEDU, PROPRIETOR, WOOD MASTERS, VALAPPU, ERNAKULAM. R1 TO R3 BY SRI. C.K. KARUNAKARAN, S.C, K.S.E.B, R4 BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS,S.C. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/03/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & B.P.RAY, JJ. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.A. No. 236 of 2011 ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 14th day of March, 2011 J U D G M E N T Ramachandran Nair, J. Appellant is apprehensive of the dangers that may be caused by the transformer installed near to his house. Admittedly, the transformer is installed in the property of the beneficiaries, who have taken industrial connection from the same. The appellant cannot oppose installation of transformer in the property of the beneficiaries. 2. However, since the appellant's house is very close to the transformer, we direct the third respondent to ensure that transformers are well maintained and servicing is done on a regular basis so that the same does not cause any danger or threat to the house of the petitioner and to the occupants therein. Writ Appeal is disposed of as above. Sd/- (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) Sd/- (B.P.RAY, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge