^ Budahdev Piperiya, S/o Late Snn Asharam Pjperiya, about 42 'years, ^VVorking as Asssstant Teacher, Primary Schooi, Knurshldin, Tahsi! & Dlstrid Durg (C.G.) Kapur S'ngh, Dewangan. S/o Snrj Semu Ram De'wangan, about 40 Asslstsnt aaed years. working as Teacher, Primary Schooi, Borasi, Block. Durg, R/o Dundlya, Post - Aijunda, Tahsl! Gunderdehi, Distnct Durg (C.G.) iVSorsdhwsj Chsndrskar, S/o Shri Pvare Lai Chandrakar. aged aboui 44 years, working as Asslstant Teacher (Pnmary Scnooi Borasi), Biock Durg, R/o yillage Daukldlha, Post iViatwan, TahsiJ Gunderdeni, '^^^^ A—^-sn^4^^ n-?-^» /^ ^ \ dijia, MtsUa, u^iuUi. L^uiy ^w.^.^ 1 8.1.. Kurrev< Distnct Education Ffi^^r Hur^ H^f^^f Hnm /f F^ ^ WS.U^^IJ, UUyy, UsO^ii ^^ UUsiy ^W.i^1.^ 2 Hema.nt Upadnyaya, Ex-Dlstt. Educatlon Officer, Durg, District Ourg (C.G.) ^rsssniiy worKiiiQ as ASSSSTSHC Professor at S.C.E..R.T. office Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) ii,rhg^.c&^ar^,yn!^-£& a Mr. Ajay Snnvastava, Counsel for the petrtioner. (16=68.2010) Hear'd. The petitioners have.fijed thss petltion for inrtiaiion of proceedings of conterrspt against the respondents for wiilful ^^f$^^_ //^" t -&)fc?%^"' disobedience In compiiance of tne order dated 03.08.2009 by this Court In VV.P.(S) No.4053/2009. This Court w'hile dlspQSing of tne aforesaid wnt petitjon the fojiowing order on 03.08.2009: "Accoraingly, tne petltion is dismissed as wlthdrawn with the liberty as aforesald. If the petrlioner mak'es a representation to the concerned respondent withln a period of one month from the date of of copy of this order, tne same is expected to be decided within a further period of two months 'rrom the of its recelpt." Learned counsel for the petrlioners submits that after passing of the order, representatlons were fiied before respondent No.2, but respondent No.2 has not the same tlil date, theretore, the petitioners have this contempt petjtlon. After going through the contents of the order 03.08.2009 (quoted above), i do not flnd any good ground to proceed further in the matter at this point of time, Thsrefore, tne petitlon for initiatson of proceedlngs of contempt against the respondents is of at this However, a Jlberty js granted to the petitloners to fiie another petitlon of contempt after two months If the concemed authoritles do not dispose of the representations fiied by the petitloners by that time. The petitioners woula be a'lowed to avaii the iiberty only If tney fiie the copy of tlils order before the concerned •authontles within one month from today along wlth a appEic-ation in tiiis regard. W'ith the aforesald observations, thls petltion stands finallydisposed.of. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge -^