Crl. Misc. No. M-30292 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-30292 of 2011 Date of Decision: December 6, 2011 Ankit Gupta …..Petitioners Vs. State of U.T. Chandigarh …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Anjali Kukar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gautam Advocate for Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for U.T. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner seeks the concession of pre-arrest bail in a case registered at the instance of Rajat Gupta alleging that he is a tenant in the basement of SCO No.124-125, Sector 34-A, Chandigarh and his stocks lying in the basement have been stolen by Madhu Gupta, mother of the petitioner and his brother Sanchit Gupta. State counsel has opposed the petition on the ground that certain recoveries are to be effected. Crl. Misc. No. M-30292 of 2011 [2] I have considered the allegations in the FIR and gone through the record. The dispute seems to be regarding the possession of tenanted premises amongst the co-tenants. No specific detail of the articles alleged to have been stolen is mentioned in the FIR. Co-accused of the petitioner, Sanchit Gupta was arrested. After police remand, he has been granted the concession of regular bail. Recoveries, if any, could have been effected pursuant to the said proceedings from the co-accused of the petitioner. The allegations in the FIR, prima facie do not reflect the details of the articles stolen. The custodial interrogation of the petitioner would not serve any purpose. In view of the abovementioned circumstances, the petition is allowed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioner he will be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to all the conditions under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. December 6, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE