/K'i HTGH COIIRT OF AT BILASPUR y»'ntPe<iuo«iNo._2§ilof2 )3 Saroj Nath Bajpai, S/o Late Shiv Shankar Bajpai, aged about 65 years, Retired Lecturer (Pt. R.avishaiikBT Shulda Univ©s'sit^/\^JQ 10 Colles R-oad. Choubev Coionv. Raiour, Tahsil & District Raipur (Chhattisgarh). N'' 1. StBte of ChhHttisssrh thru Sccret^rs^ DeD^rtiiiesit Q£ rtistier taucaTion. Manttalava. uau Kalvan Singn T^Ua^fsn ^??t^r*nr i/PO-^ 2. Commissioner. Department of Higher Education, O^G^'I. of Chhattiss&rh. Oo't?t. Scieiice Collese Camous. Raipur! Chhattissarh). 3> Pt. RsivishaiilLSj' Vishw£tYi<i^?Hla.ya,, through its Registrar. Raiour (CG). (WRJT PETmON LTNDER ARTICLE 226/7.27 OF THF, CONSTTTimON OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'Me Mr. Safish K. AgnlhotT', J.) Pr^seiit '. Shn Jitcndra Pa.li. A.dvocBts for tlis oetitioiier. Shri Aiav Dwivedi. Deputs' Govt. Advocate for the Sta.te/resDondent ^NQ. 1 ^.3 Shri J.R. Verma, Advocate forthe respondentNo. 3. ORAT OBRFR (Fasscu un 0151 day oi'May, 2008) 1. ^Arith the CQnsent of thc Qartiss- the iii&tter is take'ii UD for hssrins fs^aliv 2. This oetition Dei'ta.ius to "avnieiit ofretiral bsnefits. 3. This Court, in the matter ofW.P. No. 4642,?2004 (BaijnaA Mandal Vs. The St9te of Chhattisgarh aiid othcx's) a"d otbct coiiHectcd niattcrs, dirccted ths CQiiiniittse to consider ths ixi9tter of the rGtii'Bl dues as thG disoyted ciuestiQii of facts wsrs hivoived. The CQniniittce w&s constituted b^/~ the State Go1t/prnriieiit. Diu'suaiit tc' llis ordcr datcd 19.06.2006 oassed in W.P. I^o. 1961/2006 (Ssit. Keia Bai Cha"draka*- f ^0?- .ifl&it Vs. Ststc Oo^/eniiiient 9nd others^ ^nd order dated 13.03.2008 Ds-ssed iti M.C.C. No. 105/2008 fState of Chhattissarh aad others Vs. Baiinath ^ssidsl snd siiQth^r\ Thus, this Dstition is scsu^rs'lv covered bv thG ITI iT4<^-*-vto>i\+ nti^i-i /'i'r'f^/aif /-ln+c*rl -^ 1 ^ f~ii+ trfMnnnnr 7t i'^V r^" c'lfin'^i •' ^livUi. cliiu ^riUwi Ud.fc^U ->1 </i »><,iUU<t.JtJ,, ^wO pU^avu 114 ¥¥.A . l^t^. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Manda! Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh and others) aad other coiuiected matters, as submitted by the leamed counse! ^QDeariiis for thc D^tics.. 'rjr 4. This Detitioii is disoosed of in the sanis teniis i.e. th©ofiice of th® A.d''.?oc£iteOe?ieral is directed to scsd tlie casG to fhe CoiQniittec. within s. Dsriod of 15 dsi^/s fi'oin tlic d^^t^ 01 rsceiDt of a CQDV of this ordsr. Thsr^sftci^ the CoiTlrriitte€t shali issus iiotice to the Dstitioner sind ths oFficcrs coiiceiiied. witliiii SL fai'ther Deriod of 15 dsvs. The Coniiiiittee shall consider Biid nflss order. in accordaiice ^vith la\^. aftsr affordiiis proper opportunit)' of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers coiicenied may fi!e additional documents, if necessary. The entire ©xercise. iiicludins r5avrnent of retiral dues. if aiiv- to the Dctitioiier^ be coniDleted witlisn a Dsriod of fbur nioiiths fi'Qni the dste Slahu OT rp'cp'irtt o'fa cnnv Q^tUi'c nrri(sr '-"f '-"i- *~ *""J'»/ "'•'" "-"-"" ^.^.^—.. J. •w"-/ -. 5. Oiie extra, CODV of the DaDsrs of th^ GctitiQii shsll bs suoDlicd l?v ths \. l^ariisd couiise'l aDDearin2 fcr ths D©titionerto Shri A-ia-v Uwivedi. Ocnnts? Oo'.rt. A.d^/ocRfe. todEV itself. for tr8i'tsferrin2 the suine to ths corntriittce. SA'- Satish K. Agrahctri Judge t;illi:!ILfli.