IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL REVISION No.47 of 2006 Purosottam Kumar Singhal … Revisionist Versus State of Uttaranchal and three others … Respondent Dated: November 6, 2008 Sri Manish Arora, Adv. for Revisionist Sri Harish Pujari, Addl. G.A. for State/Respondent No.1 Sri Nagesh Aggarwal, Adv. for Respondent Nos.3 & 4 HON. DHARAM VEER, J. This criminal revision, preferred by the revisionist under Section 397/401 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as Cr.P.C.) r/w Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, is directed against the judgment and order dated 14.02.2006 passed by Addl. Family Judge, Roorkee in Case No.220/2003, Shivali Vs. Purshottam Singhal, whereby the application of the revisionist moved u/s 126(2) of Cr.P.C. as well as delay condonation application, have been rejected. Sri Manish Arora, learned counsel for the revisionist submitted before the Court that the present revision has been preferred against the interim order and now the final order has been passed in the matter on 30.03.2006 by learned Addl. Family Judge, Roorkee. He further prayed that he is desirous to challenge the final order dated 30.3.2006. Hence he prayed that he may be permitted to withdraw the present revision. Prayer being innocuous, deserves to be accepted. In view of the above, the revision is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order dated 12.4.2006 passed by this Court stands vacated. (Dharam Veer, J.) November 6, 2008 Rajeev Dang