IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.29/2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.12/2008 KSL AND INDUSTRIES LIMITED ..VS.. UNION OF INDIA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.A. Padhye, adv for petitioner Shri Kaptan, adv for respondent CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. D A T E : APRIL 27, 2011. By this petition, the petitioners seek action against the respondents under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act for disobeying the order passed by this court on 15.12.2009 in W.P. No.12/2008, whereby the respondents were directed to refund the amount of Rs.18.10 crores to the petitioner whereupon the petitioner was to hand over the possession of 20 acres of land along with plants and machinery to the respondents. It appears on hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the submissions made on behalf of the respondent no.3 that the respondent had no intention to disobey the orders passed by this court and in pursuance of the order, the respondent no.3 had made payment of the amount to the petitioner. On the said payment of the amount the respondent no.3 had also taken the possession of the land from the petitioner. In this view of the matter the order dated 15.12.2009 is complied with, though not within a stipulated period and the respondent no.3 has purged the contempt. In view of the aforesaid position the contempt proceedings against the respondents are hereby dropped. No order as to costs. JUDGE SMP