EEC—H CGURT OF JUD!CATURE QEHAT’F!$GAR. : ELLASPL’R Sing e BeEch: Han’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotti, J. W. P. {$3 E3. 1853 of 2333 P€titioner Vamn Nagash 8/0. Kaawal Siagh Nagcsh, aged about 40 years, RIO. G‘ 24, New Civil Lina, Rajaandgacxx {CG} Respondents. 1. bitate 0f Uhham‘sgarh, 'l‘hmugh z Tim Chief Secretary, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mamralayn, Raipur (CG; Versus 2. Da uty Sgcrétary, Mahih Awam Bal Vikas ’l‘atha Samaj Kalyan Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan, amtralaya, Kai? 11“ {€41} Shri V. K. Shaima, Advocate: for 1116 petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Daputy Gcvt. Advscate. far the raspgndents. ORAL GREER i Passed or; this 28th day sf March, £003) 1‘ With ths caasent 0f the parties, fhs matter is haarcl fmally. 2. Laarimd €om1Se1 apye ing for {ha p€ 'tianer submiis that fh€ pétifianer, whils working as Prsjact O1T1C€13 Narayanpur was placad undar s‘usgmnsian an accmmt of aEeg€d imegularhy in ap130h1tme11t of Angallwadi Xxaiyakaria 011 8.8.2607 (Annsxure P,’ 1). Th€ peticicmer fuYthgr Sabxnits that mora than 90 days haw passad and. the pmitianer has not bsen served aHy charge shsst. Under rhe p1 visions 6f suhsruls (5} 0f Ruk 9 of the Chhattisgaxh Civil Services (Classification, Con “oi and Appsal} Rulss, 1966, i116 order of suspension shah smd revoked if the charge sheet is not server‘l Within ‘90 davs. 3. in the case of the pe‘o‘tioner, 90 days are over and no Charge sheet has been issued, The petitioner has acoordiiigly made a1 .m‘ applicatiox1 {Amaxurg P/Q} t0 the District Women $1nl Child Davalapmmat Officer, Rajnandgaml far ravecatimi cf the susparmisn and passing $1 order as per 316 akava matad provisians of law. Nothing has baml done til} data In vittw 0f the above stated facts, it appearS that th€ casg 6f the patitimmr is squar€1y cavsred untlar the provisions 6f sub—mile {5} of Rme 9 0f the Ru1es, 1966. Accordingly, the respohdent No.2 is directed t6 ctmsider the ahpheation of the petitiener $11<i paes aphmpeiate chief after verification of facts, iii aceordahoe with the provisions of sub—mie (5} of Ruie 9 of the Ruies, 1955. With the above direction, the petition Stande dieposeti of. No order asto cos a. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge