// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3260/2004 With S.B. Civil Misc. Stay Application No.2813/2004 {Abdul Hafiz Vs. The Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Parsaran Nigam Limited and Others} Date of Order ::: 15.05.2009 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri M.S. Beg, Counsel for petitioner Ms. Sonam Singh, Counsel for respondents #### By the Court:- Learned counsel for respondents has raised an objection that this writ petition has become infructuous for the reason that in the writ petition petitioner has sought two reliefs – one about his promotion and another about finalization of charge-sheet pending against him. Petitioner has now already been promoted and charge-sheet has also been finalized and he has been punished therein. Petitioner has already filed fresh writ petition being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10073/2007 claiming therein his promotion from back year and challenging punishment order also. Learned counsel for petitioner does not dispute that petitioner has been promoted and charge-sheet against him has also been finalized // 2 // and he has also filed fresh writ petition but his only grievance is that he should have been promoted from back year and he could not have been punished in the charge-sheet. Be that as it may, there is no dispute that both the reliefs sought in the present writ petition have been granted by respondents and for remaining reliefs the petitioner has already filed fresh Writ Petition No.10073/2007. In these circumstances, I am of the view that this writ petition has become infructuous and the same is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Consequent upon dismissal of the writ petition, the stay application, filed therewith, does not survive and the same is also dismissed. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//