1 25 caf.588.11 ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 588 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL (stamp) NO. 4163 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Ashutosh M. Kulkarni for the Applicant. Mr. Sandeep S. Jinsiwala for Respondent No.2. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 18 th August, 2011. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant and the learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.2. 2 The learned counsel appearing for the Applicant invited attention of the Court to the peculiar nature of the impugned judgment and award passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The Applicant is the original claimant. It is pointed out that the entire compensation amount has been deposited by the Respondent No.2, but in view of clause No.6 of the operative part of the impugned judgment and 2 25 caf.588.11 award, the Applicant is unable to get the amount. There is sufficient explanation for delay. Hence, the rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). [ A.S.OKA, J ]