^i^^. HIGH CQXJRT OF CHHATTISCSARH AT BIL^PUR W.P.(S| N0. 7730/2007 P1BTITIOMER Versus RESPONDBNTS 4. Sukfal Ram Niahad, S/o. Late Shri Bhaiyalal Nishad, aged about 52 yeara, Assistaat Teacher, Goverrunent Primary School Potapaai, Block-PaU, District Korba (CG) State of Chliattisgarli, Through Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, RaipUT (CG) The Director, PubUc Instruction Department, Raipur (CG) District Education OfBcer, Korba Block Education Officcr, Pali, Distnct Korba (CG) WRIT PBTITION UWDBR ARTICLB 226 OF THB CONSTITUTIOW 0V IltDIA (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. AaaUtotri. J.» Shri Anup Majumdar, Advocate appears on behalf of SIui K.S.Pawar, couasel for fhe petitioner, Ms. Binu Sharnaa, Panel Lawyer for fhe State. OR&L ORDBR (Passed oa this 3rd day ofJaauary 2008) Learaed couasel appearing for the petitioner submits fhat fhe petitioaer was appointed on a fixed pay scale ofRs. 150/-. After completion of his probation, the petitioner was granted rcgiilar pay scale. This Court has considered the identical issues in ffae inatter of Paras Nath Gupta Vs. State of Cbhattisgarh & OUiers ia W.P.(S) No. 58/2007 wjtiereunder It was decided that Parasnath Gupta, who is siuulalrty situated, be granted regular pay scale with effect frosi the date of uutial appointinent. Leamed cozmsel ftirther subaiits that the present case is squarely covered by the decision of fhis Court ia the case of Paras Nath Gupta Vs. State of Chh.'ittisgarh and Othei^ (Supra). Suguna Leacned counsel appearmg tbr the respondeats/State has no objection. In view of the tbiegoiag, tlus petition is atlowed ia the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge