IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 8050 of 1996 Between: Voltas Employees Union, represented by its General Secretary, Sri Ravindra Babu, Patancheru, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1.The Appellate Authority, under the Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act and Industrial Tribunal-I, Ist Floor, Chandravihar, Opp: Exhibition Graounds, Hyderabad. 2.The Certifying Officer-Cum-Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Ranga Reddy Zone), Anjaiah Karmika Bhavan, R.T.C. 'X' Roads, Hyderabad. 3.Voltas Limited, Chemical Plant, Patancheru, Medak District. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or issue a writ, particularly one in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records on the File of the Appellate Authority Under the Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act and Industrial Tribunal in Standing Order Appeal No.1/1993 dt: 30-9-1995 and quash the same being Voilative of the Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.G.RAVINDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent No.3: MR.C.R.SRIDHARAN, SC FOR VOLTAS. The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for issuance of writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the file of the Appellate Authority under the Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act and Industrial Tribunal in Standing Order Appeal No.1 of 1993 dated 30.9.1995 approving the standing orders of the 3rd respondent-management. 2. The petitioner-union raised all the objections on the draft Standing Orders, which were taken in this writ petition, before the Certifying Authority as well as Appellate Authority. Both the Authorities have considered the same in detail and rejected the contention of the petitioner herein. Except saying that certain provisions of the Standing Orders certified were in violation of the Industrial Standing (model) Orders Act, no substantial case is made out to interfere with the orders passed by the Appellate Authority in approving the certification granted by the second respondent. 3. It is always open for the writ petitioner to raise any industrial dispute whenever necessary or point out that particular provision is contrary or inconsistent with any other statutes, or otherwise. The Standing Orders certified by the Second respondent as confirmed by the Appellate Authority does not suffer from any irrational or unreasonable exercise made by the authorities concerned. The writ petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU,J. Date: 02nd March 2005. BSB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.The Appellate Authority, under the Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act and the Chairman Industrial Tribunal-I, Ist Floor, Chandravihar, Opp: Exhibition Graounds, Hyderabad. 2.The Certifying Officer-Cum-Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Ranga Reddy Zone), Anjaiah Karmika Bhavan, R.T.C. 'X' Roads, Hyderabad. 3.Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Labour, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad (OUT). 4. Two CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SUNITHA}