IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 7TH MARCH 2008 / 17TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 7731 of 2008(U) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ T.RADHA, LAKSHMY SADHANAM,WARD NO.IIA KURUMANDAL, PARAVOOR P.O.,KOLLAM, NOW RESIDING AT SITHARA, MATHILIL P.O.,KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.SIVARAJ SMT.SUDARSANA DEVI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (F) DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. TH DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER KOLLAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BEJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).7731/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 7th day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that she was appointed as Hospital Attendant Grade-II pursuant to Ext.P1 order, on temporary basis. Apparently, according to her, she was sponsored by the Employment Exchange. She submits that similarly situated persons were later re-engaged. She refers to Ext.P2 Government Order in this regard. In my view, petitioner ought to approach the Government in the first instance. I heard learned Government Pleader also. In the result, writ petition is disposed of in the following terms: Petitioner may submit a representation before the Government detailing her claim referring to Exts.P2 and P3 within one month from today. If such representation is so filed, first respondent shall look into the claim made by W.P.(C).7731/2008 2 the petitioner and take a decision thereon within two months thereafter, keeping in mind the directions issued by this Court in Vasanthi v. State of Kerala (2006 (1) KLT 288). Petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition also along with the copy of the judgment. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs