REG?§-CQUR? (2? CHH£¥€T§SG5XR§IE é? EEL§$E§E§R §iV§S§GN EEf‘iélii QRéé‘vE‘ HGN‘ELE SHR§ RAJEE‘J GHF‘E‘F’i, SJ, : £=5G§\5’3LE $5€R§ $3§§£L KBMAR 35%%A, J: Migc. Anaeai Na, E'B? G? 2&92 :‘Agaegiam . Rohan Shindey, éged about 35 years, 'CEaimani 3ft» Mahadev Shmdey, Occupakirl - Contractor, R/e HG — 18823, Veer ‘Savarkar Nagar, Hiramzr, Raipur< >3} V‘ ¥E£$i§$ Pram Chand Vishwakarma, Aged abow. 35 years, SIG KashE wShwakarma, Rio Dhancha Bhavan, N937§7 Ta‘tiband‘n‘ Raw? (CG) Mls Kissgn Mechanicai Wmks, Through m Divisjlana Managgr, ms §$san Meghanicai Works; Us‘iaz‘, Raipur (CG) Rgsngnéenis Nan—awiisams Misa. famwai iméay $ec€icm ii? af ma Maia? ‘ié‘ehiséag Sig Prase : nt Shri AL Singraui! counse: o’ ihe appeiiant Shri LGke$h $éngh, caunsei an behaEf 0f $hri Ratnesh AgravwL ceunse‘i for responc§em No.2. aREER g2$€h gamma 29113;, The fouawing orde! of the Caurf was passed by Egeev $u§§t&, CM! .Appeiiant Rohan Shindey is seeking emancement of the campensaiion a'Warded by fhe Second Acidiiionai Matar Accidant’ Claims Tribunai! Raipui’ (for Short ”the Tribuna‘i’) Vida award ciated 38.033.2692; passed in Claim Case N0.33/20€31. .’....’. [ S 1 M S ‘ K ¢ [ v x l 2} As agginSi the compemsation bf Rs.5‘2Ci,GGGX—j ciaimed by tit-3 appeilanwciaéman'i, by fémg a ciaim aeiitian under Seciien 168 f im Motar Vehisies Ad far ifhe in§u¥i33 sugtainecé by him in i’rxe memr aecident 0n 2303.2Um, the Tyibunai awarded a tatai 3um cf { J $.?,6S6/— as camgensaiien aisng wiih inieresi @ 6% per annum f‘em ihs date a? the fiéing of ihe daim petition tiH i’ne date 9f actua§ :gagmen‘; a) The Tfiibur‘ai on a’ciose $crutiny 9f the entire evideme ied in“ befere it hezd i’nai ciaiman‘i: Roshan Shéndey suetained muiiipie Emuréee in ihe meter accident on 2S3.03.2C3m; ihe aceédem occurree‘ cue-m raeh ene negiigent driving cf ihe motorcydiei of the Here Er’uch MeiorcycEe beefing regEs‘traiior: NeM?-23NXG234; the ineéiorcyc€iet anti the owner ef the memreyde, 33 such. were Eiabie 0 way compehsetmh is the c§aimaht. 4‘ ‘ The Thbunai cansidering ‘sihe num‘ner and natwe of ihe hjuriee proved i0 have been sustained by ihe ciaiman'x in ihe meter aeeident and ihe ameunt proved ta have been spent on hie .reatment, awatcied Rs.5,(300[- towards pain and euft’ering; RezQOOI- towards toss of inoome during the period ot treatment; not Rs.656!~ towarde medicai expenses. The Tribunei, thus, l brvareied e tetei eum of Ref§56f~ ae campensetéeh the ciai’ment. the Ttibunei further directed peyment‘ ef interest on the above Q d”te of the fiiing of the oiaim petition tiit the date of actuat payment. 5} The unfortunate accident took piece ott 2933.20m ahot the i i i i x ‘ i r .1 fMe mount of compensation of Rs.?,656!- @ 8% per annum from the eteabiiity certificate oroduoed by the claimant before the Trtbunat ii i i J i h} Q3 (ExP‘) isec by {2 Dr GS 836mm; afier 2 Vé yea? an : H sui WW i‘OB2GQ Thg he ciaiman’i p€eaded tha’: he has spent i QZ wh t -§Q,i~ 0n treatment, the ’mEEs and vauchem; graduced R$5GQ00 his ! L K § I ; befai‘e me ribumai were i0 the axtent 0'? R3856f— Univ. 6‘) The campenggimn 0f R37§5€5l4 awai'ded, ax; tha Tribum when exammed in ihe ccntexé: 0f “the above mentéQned bmad featurss of ihe case, we are sat§e§ie¢ ie just and grape? p aeai ge ‘ 7) We, iheres‘are, d9 mt end any ecepe f9? enhancemen? 9f me cmtiem awarddby me ‘fribuneh ‘ spensa e 8 Th ei 'fiied by the ameiiamiciaimant for enheracemem ) e abpe ? ihe ceneaiion, i‘nerefore. fails and. is here‘ey ciiemiesed. a mee sqmensation and do’es mi can fog” any enhancemeni in iime Q) N e ordei‘ ae i9 caste. 91 ,,‘ ,u ‘4; I; Sd/— t i i t w” / ‘ I Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge \ V L; 7 d/— ‘: ‘ CHIEF JUSICE i T i l \ K 1 \ . J :“: S \ 1 ‘ * f T paQn ia