.^' HISH COURT OF CHHATTjSGARH: BILASPUR ,CJ. t Petition ('C) No.4884 of200i Sharati Deshmukh, aged about 24 years, D/o Shri Mohit Deshmukh, R/o HiG 23, Padmanabhpur, Durg (C.G.) Versus Kumar Sambhav Mandavl, aged about 24 ysars, S/o Shri Ksshori Lai Mandavi, Scheduled Tribe Gond. H!G 8. Panch 2. Durg (C.G.) Arya Samaj Mandir, Baij Nath Para,Ra!pur(C.G.5 Through President, Arya Samaj, Baijnaihpara, Raipur (C.G.) Hon'bSe District Magistrate, Raipur (C.G.) Present: Shrl V.G. Tamaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner. ORALO! (Passed on 12'" September, 2006) ~he grievance of the petitjoner is that though the 3 Principai Judge, Family Court, Durg has no jurisdidion to entertain the case No. 51-A/2006 in as much as Hindu Marriage Act has no appiication and iearned 3 Principa! Judge, Famiiy Court has registered the case wifhout jurisdiction. In the prsmise of the above contention, this writ petition is 'nied for quashing the proceedings by writ of certiorari. if it is the case of the petltioner that the reglstration of the case instituted by the 1 respondent itself is without jurisdiction, this plea couid be raised before the Family Court itseif. !t cannot be said that the Famiiy Court has jurisdictlon to decide the jurisdictiona! issue aiso. !n that view of the mattsr, S am not inclined to entertain this writ petition at this stage. Writ petition is dismissed. However, this order shal! not come in the way of the petitloner raising a jurisdictionai issue before ihe learned amiiy Judge for its consideration and decision, if she is so Sd/- Chief Justice Kvr r