1 arbp263.11.sxw ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 263 OF 2011 Ashok Gotecha ....Petitioner. Vs. Arvind Gotecha & ors. ...Respondents. Mr. P.M. Shah with Mr. Dharmesh Jain i/by M/s.Mahesh Shah & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. Chirag Shah with Ms.Neha Choksi for Respondent no.1. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 24th MARCH, 2011 P.C.: Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard finally. The parties are the family members. As dispute arose, one of the brother has invoked Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Arbitration Act). As there exists an Arbitration clause in the family arrangement, by consent, the parties have agreed to appoint Mr. Bharat Merchant, Advocate, as the Arbitrator to decide the disputes arising out of the family arrangement 2 arbp263.11.sxw ssm of 23rd February, 2005. The parties to take steps accordingly. An Affidavit of reply is taken on record. 2 The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents has already made statement which is recorded on 10th March, 2011. However, today he fairly conceded that as the dispute is arising between the brothers, the Court may grant prayer clause (a) till the final adjudication of the dispute between the parties. Order accordingly. 3 As the Respondents never intended to obstruct and they themselves want to settle the matter finally, in view of this, the Petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)