IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 11772 of 2008. Decided on 24 th December, 2010. Mohan Lal Verma. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 no ________________________________________________________ __ For the petitioner. : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner has already made a representation for the redressal of his grievance to respondent No. 2, i.e., Director of Education on 18.01.2005 (Annexure A-8). However, the same has not been decided till date. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to decide the representation made by the petitioner on 18.01.2005 (Annexure A-8) by a speaking order after hearing the petitioner in person, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 24, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? no