IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16208 of 2011 Pradeep Kumar Singh @ Sanjay Kumr Singh @ Sanjay Singh & Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 04/- 25/07/2011 Heard Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Brij Kisore Prasad learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners are named accused in this case relating to a power of attorney for sale of piece of land. The parties appears settle their dispute and filing a petition for compromise. As it further, appears from the order of learned Sessions Judge that the informant appeared before the court and accepts factum of compromise, but some how or other, the doubt was raised in the mind of learned Sessions Judge about the genuineness of the compromise. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on the event of informant appearing as witness and on due identification supports the factum of compromise with his free will and consent without any coercion and receiving the entire amount as claimed with specific details of deposit/investment and also stood as one of the bailors, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the petitioners, namely, 1. Pradeep Kumar Singh @ Sanjay Kumar Singh @ Sanjay Singh, 2. Vijay Prasad and 3. Sanjay Singh, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, in connection with Gopalganj P.S. Case No. 13 of 2011, subject to 2 condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)