W.P. No. 506 (S/S)03: (Old No. 3182 of 1998) Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri I.P. Gairola, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttaranchal. Counsel for the parties have submitted that the controversy raised by means of this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Hon’ble Court delivered on 15th September 2003 in writ petition no. 1439 (S/S) 2001 Guddu Singh Rawat & three ors. vs. Ddirector, Animal Husbandry U.P. & four ors. and in writ petition no. 1440 (ss) 2001 Sudama Singh Vs. Director Animal Husbandry U.P. & ors. delivered on 7th January 2004, as such, the present writ petition may be decided on the same terms and conditions of the aforesaid judgments. Consequently, this writ petition is disposed of on the same terms and condition of the writ petition no. 1439 (S/S) 2001 Guddu Singh Rawat & three ors. vs. Ddirector, Animal Husbandry U.P. & four ors. and in writ petition no. 1440 (ss) 2001 Sudama Singh Vs. Director Animal Husbandry U.P. & ors. delivered on 15.09.2003 and 07.01.2004 respectively. 05.09.2005: (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) NCM: