IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39815 of 2011 Chandan Singh @ Chandan Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 2 25.11.2011 This is an application for restoration of Cr.Misc.No. 34613 of 2010 which stood rejected for not having complied with the peremptory order dated 22.2.2011 within time granted to the petitioner to take steps for fresh service of notice on opposite party no.2 under both processes. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that due to mistake of Advocate Clerk, requites for issuance of notice to opposite party no.2 under both processes could not be filed within time. As such, for non-compliance of order dated 22.2.2011 the case stood rejected. Learned counsel submits in paragraph-5 of the restoration application that requisites etc. for issuance of notice have already been filed in the office on 09.03.2011. In view of submissions, the restoration application is allowed and Cr.Misc.No. 34613 of 2010 is restored to its original file. Let necessary requisites under both processes, if filed by the petitioner for 2 issuance of notice on opposite party no.2 be accepted. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)