THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S. RAO WRIT PETITION No.2847 of 2006 DATED:29-03-2006 Between: Narravula Chinna Subbarayudu .. Petitioner And The District Registrar, Kurnool District, Kurnool. and others. ..Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.2847 of 2006 ORDER: The petitioner claims to be the owner of land in survey Nos.270 (Acs.1.32 cents), 468 (Acs.0.77 cents), 283 (Acs.0.76 cents) and 85 (Acs.1.66 cents) of Sangapatnam Village, Owk Mandal, Kurnool District, by reason of a settlement deed executed by the petitioner’s grand father on 18-06-1984. He alleges that the third respondent executed a sale deed in October 1986 conveying Acs.0.70 cents of land in favour of the fourth respondent, who allegedly abducted the third respondent and got executed a registered sale deed. A police complaint was given by petitioner’s grand father. In connection with this dispute, the petitioner wanted to procure a certified copy of the sale deed executed in favour of the third respondent. Therefore, he approached the first respondent, who did not furnish the certified copy allegedly due to the reason that the fourth respondent prevailed over him not to furnish the copy. Therefore, he filed the instant writ petition seeking a direction to the first respondent to furnish the certified copy of the registered sale deed, bearing document No.5752/86, dated 09.09.1986, executed by Angirekula Avulanna in favour of the third respondent. This writ petition has been coming up from 17.02.2006 for admission. Today, when the case is called, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (General), Sri P. Raj Kumar, on instructions, submits that on 28.02.2006 itself, the District Registrar sent a telegraphic notice to the petitioner to come over to his office and collect the document, which he applied for. He also submits that the petitioner did not go to the office of the first respondent and he can now go and collect the document. In view of the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (General), it must be held that the petitioner’s grievance has been redressed, and it shall be open to the petitioner to approach the first respondent and obtain the certified copy of the sale deed, dated 09.09.1986, after payment of the prescribed charges. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ___________ (V.V.S.RAO,J) 29.03.2006 GJ