... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.322 OF 2006 REVISION APPLICATION NO.322 OF 2006 REVISION APPLICATION NO.322 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Miss R.P. Safari for the Petitioner. Shri Rajesh More, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : SEPTEMBER 08, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 08, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 08, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Not on board. Taken on board. 1. This Revision Application under section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is filed for challenging order dated 20th July, 2006 passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Esplanade, Mumbai. The Petitioner has approached this court by way of Revision without approaching the Sessions Court by filing Revision Application under section 397 of the said Code. The Petitioner cannot approach this court in such fashion. The Revision Application is rejected. Rejection of the Revision ... 2 ... Application will not preclude the Applicant from filing Revision Application in the Sessions Court. 2. If the certified copy of the impugned order is filed in this Revision Application, the office will return the same to the Advocate for the Applicant. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE