IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 12544 of 1998 Between: R.V.Kishan Rao, S/o. V.Ranga Rao. R/o. Nirmal, Adilabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Government of A.P., Nampally, Hyderabad. 2 Commercial Tax Officer, Nirmal, Adilabad District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in applying G.O.Ms.No.35 dated 27/02/1997 to the petitioner building as illegal arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent to pay agreed rent and pass such other or further orders as the Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.O.MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondents Nos.: The Special Government Pleader for Taxes. The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: (Per Sri BRSR.J It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. (B.SUDERSHAN REDDY,J) Dt.27.4.2005 (C.V.RAMULU,J) msv. To 1 The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Government of A.P., Nampally, Hyderabad. 2 The Commercial Tax Officer, Nirmal, Adilabad District. 3 2 CCs to Special GP for Commercial Tax, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad (OUT) 4 2 CD copies.