1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.718 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.967 OF 2006 WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.639 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.993 OF 2006 M/s.Ravi Foundation. ..Appellant. V/s. Rajaram Ramdular Sharma. ..Respondent. Mr.Anuj Narula & Ms. Sampada A. Pavajaji for M/s.Jhangiani, Narula & Associates for appellant. Mr.C.K.Tripathi for respondent. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : JANUARY 12, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 12, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 12, 2007. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Counsel for the parties have tendered Consent Terms duly signed by the parties as well as their advocates, in terms whereof, the matter has been amicably resolved finally between the parties. The Constituted Attorney of the parties are present in the Court and claim that they have authority to execute this Consent Terms. They have accepted the fact that they have understood the contents of the consent terms tendered. Consent Terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. Appeal as well as suit pending before the trial court to stand 2 disposed of in terms of Consent Terms. 2. The parties may move formal application before the trial Court for decreeing suit in terms of Consent Terms, which application, if made, be disposed of on the day, when it is presented before the trial Court by the parties. 3. Undertaking given by the parties, as noted in the Consent Terms and reiterated across the bar by the Constituted Attorney as well as the concerned advocate is accepted. 4. Civil applications in the respective appeal from orders disposed of accordingly.