IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 827 OF 2007 Dattatraya Shrirang Bhosale...... ...... ...... Appellant V/s Shrirang Ramchandra Bhosale & Ors. ...... ..... Respondents. Mr.Rahul Kate, Adv. For the appellant. Mr.Milind Deshmukh, Adv. For respondents. CORAM: R.V. MORE, J. 17th NOVEMBER, 2008. PC: Heard Mr.Rahul Kate, Adv. For the appellant and Mr.Milind Deshmukh, Adv. For the respondents. This second appeal is filed by the plaintiff whose suit for declaration and partition was partly decreed in respect of house property and dismissed in respect of agricultural land. The lower appellate court confirmed the decree. 2. The appellant-plaintiff is son of respondent No.1. In partition between respondent Nos.1 to 7 agricultural land admeasuring 79 Aars came to the share of respondent No.1 who is father of the appellant- plaintiff. This property was sold out by respondent No.1 in favour of respondent No.9. The appellant-plaintiff also challenged this sale deed in above suit. Both the lower courts below concurrently held 1 that this sale deed is executed for legal necessity. Naturally therefore the appellant-plaintiff was not held to be entitled for any share in the agricultural land. So far as house property is concerned the appellant-plaintiff's suit is decreed. I do not find any error or perversity in the approach adopted by the lower appellate court. No question of law, much less a substantial question of law is involved. Hence second appeal stands dismissed. 17.11.08 (R.V. MORE, J.) 2