IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 27 of 2011 Manoj Kumar Dass …….Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents. Sri Davesh Bishnoi, Advocate present for the petitioner. Sri Dinesh Gahtori, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (oral) Heard Sri Davesh Bishnoi, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri Dinesh Gahtori, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. The petitioner is a Tax & Revenue Inspector in Nagar Palika Parishad, Haldwani, District Nainital. His services are also centralised. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has not been promoted to the next higher grade. This appears to be a case where disputed questions of facts are involved. Therefore, it is in the fitness of thing that the matter be taken cognizance by the State Public Services Tribunal. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy by filing a claim petition before the State Public Services Tribunal, this writ petition is hereby dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. Counsel for the petitioner has raised apprehensions that presently the composition of the State Public Services Tribunal is not complete. However, learned State Counsel Sri Dinesh Gahtori has apprised this Court that the Administrative Member has been appointed and the State Public Services Tribunal is working on its full strength. It is expected that the matter, if filed before the 2 State Public Services Tribunal, shall be decided expeditiously. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 7.1.2011 Avneet