IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WP. (S) No.?2l312010 ‘r’sewi A RESPONDENTS (/(‘1) State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) C; (2) Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division (Samanya), Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) (3) Depot Officer, office of Depot Officer (forest), Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF /. we ’ X PETITIONER Kanshlal Dhruv, S/o. Shri Ramji " ’ Dhruv, aged about 47 years, R/o. Q («\Vw Mukarn 8L Post — Jhuratrai, vbw 0 Tahsil — Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari 0% V (C.G.) R S U S i_... W Wm mgmgéevw5 ‘gT-L 200 (,c Wm Wm WW mmmm WWW£IWWR % 3Wm 3.3.: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. PRITliNKER DIWAKER petitioner. petition is that the post of Forest ofwatchman. the respondexxts necessary order in stage the petitioner petition with liberty No.2 and the with law as ascertaining whether the State of the petitioner he has no before the decided by it in with a direction ‘ by the petitioner the same is ‘. 99 12 2010 Shri Vinod Dashmukh, counsel Smt. Smita Ghai, P.L. for the Grievance of the petitioner in though he is entitled for his regulari Guard, he has been regularized on Counsel for the petitioner ve completed all the formalities f0: avour of the petitioner and therefore lmay be permitted to withdraw the to file a fresh representation before lsame may be directed to be decided l Expeditiously as possible. Counsel for the State submits the fact he cannot make any Government is Willing to regularize on the post of Forest Guard or objection if the petitioner makes authority concerned and the accordance with la/v/V/ ’. '1’ Accordingly, the petition is that in the event of any representation before respondent No.2 raising for the. Siam. the present zation on the post sudmits that. passing at this stage present respondent in accordance that Without statement the services not. However, a representation same is disposed of tiled his grievances, urt has not expressed any d the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the re resentation of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge accordance with law as expeditious y as possible. It is made clear that this opinion on merits of the case {we "aftq'a anewm CD m may W 200 mm Wm WW mmmxfa W3W 113$m % mt! 311w expectzd to be decided by t authority concerned in