IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9091 of 2009 1. MD.ISRAFIL, S/o Md. Idrish 2. Md. Idrish, S/o late Maniruddin 3. Hasina Khatoon, W/o Md. Idrish 4. Anisha Khatoon, D/o Md. Idrish 5. Md. Rizwan Alam, W/o Tashiruddin 6. Julekha Khatoon @ Pamabali, W/o Rizwan Alam Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 10.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that differences of the wife and husband has been made a ground for petitioners’ implication in a false case, otherwise in a marriage having one girl from both the families i.e. in an exchange marriage(Golat), there can be no probable demand of any dowry from either of the families. In my view, petitioners’ arrest cannot be justified in this case. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 1730-C of 2007, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. w shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)