IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.20105 of 2001 Between: Toddy Coop.Socirety, Rep by its President Sri A.Bala Goud, Nandi Kandi(Village), Sadasivpet Mandal, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND The Proh & Excise Superintendent, Sangareddy, Medak District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to continue suspension upto 30.9.2001 thereafter renew the petitioner Society Licence for the excise year 2001-2002 for a period of 5 years in respect Licences bearing No.50 & 51 without reference to the previous excise year Criminal case in PR No.130/2001-2002, Dt.19.8.2001 declaring the impugned suspension order vide Proc.Cr.No.B6/1450/2001, dt.30.8.2001 after 30.9.2001 as illegal, in respect of Toody Coop.Society, Nandi Kandi village, Sadasivapet Mandal, Medak District. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.SAI RAM GOUD Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri B.Sairam Goud, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO,J) June 29, 2005. YS To 1 The Proh & Excise Superintendent, Sangareddy, Medak District. 2 Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Prohibition & Excise, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (OUT) 3 Two CD Copies.