HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WMT PETITION (C) No. 3853 of2009 PETmONER : Anand Kumar Xaxa, S/o Late Eamest Xaxa, Aged about 36 years, R/o Chandra Nagar Village & P.0. Ramanujganj, P.S. Pal (Tah) Dist. Sarguja C.G. State. VERSUS RESPO^T)ENTS : 1. State of C.G.Through: Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Govt. ofCG DKS Bhawaii, Raipur. 2. President High Power Caste Scmtiny Committee, Pandit Dindayal Upadhyay Nagar, Sector - 4, Raipur CG State. WRIT PETmON L^NDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotri, J. Present: Shri D.R.Minj, Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri Amn Sao, Goveniment Advocate for the State/respoiidents. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 27m day of July, 2009) Heard. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the State of Chhattisgary, by order dated 21 July, 2003 (Annexure P/7), has laid down certain guidelines. One of the guideline is that in case of domicile of Chhattisgarh- no record prior to 1950 may be demanded for the purpose of issue ofcaste certificate. Shi'i Minj further submits that the respondent No. 1 is not proceeding with the matters where revenue documents prior to 1950 is notavailable. 2. Shi'i Sao, leamed counsel appearing for tfae State/respondents submits that the respondent No. 2 will examine the matter m accordance wifh law as laid down by the Supreme Court in catena of decisiosn and all other instmctions, guidelines issued by the State Govemment time to time. 3. Be that as it may- it is not expedient to entertain this petition at this stage when the matter is still pending consideration before the Caste Scmtiny Cominittee. It is expected that the Caste Scmtiny Comiiiittee shall consider the matter in the light ofjudgment and order passed by the Suprenie Court m the matter of Kuma?i Madhziri Patil and another v; AddL Commissioner, Tribal Development & Others1 and other matters as well as guidelines, msti'uctions- if any, issued by the Statc, and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law. 4. In view offhe above- the petition stands disposed of i SatishK.Agnihotri S Judge '(1994) 6 SCC 241