IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 888 OF 2008. INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 888 OF 2008. INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 888 OF 2008. The Commissioner of Income-Tax-IV, Pune-411 004. .. Appellant. V/s. Vanaz Engineers Ltd.Pune-411 038. ..Respondent. Mrs Devaki Iyer, Advocate for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND V.C.DAGA, JJ. AND V.C.DAGA, JJ. AND V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED: 08th OCTOBER, 2008. DATED: 08th OCTOBER, 2008. DATED: 08th OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. None for the respondent. 2. On 26.8.2008 the appeal was adjourned to 16.9.2008 to enable the appellant to serve the respondent. On 16.9.2008 the learned counsel for the appellant stated that the appellant has not been able to serve the respondent and the appellant’s counsel gave undertaking to serve the respondent within two weeks. Accordingly, on 16.9.2008 the appeal was adjourned to 30.9.2008. Today, even on 8.10.2008 the learned counsel for the appellant states that the appellant has not served the respondent and no steps have been taken to serve the respondent. 3. In view of the above and callous attitude on the part of the appellant, we are constrained to dismiss the above appeal. Appeal is accordingly dismissed. (V.C. DAGA,J) (V.C. DAGA,J) (V.C. DAGA,J) (DR S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J) (DR S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J) (DR S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J)