IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16122 of 2011 RAVI KUMAR PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 23.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 414 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47 of Bihar Excise Act. 187 cartoons of beer were recovered. It is alleged that from Madhya Pradesh the beers were transported to the liquor shop dealers of Bihar directly to evade the taxes. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is the owner of the truck and he executed power of attorney in favour of one Binod Kumar Gupra for looking after the business, admittedly the petitioner was not present on the place of seizure. It appears from the record that driver has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 2589 of 2010 by this Court, who was apprehended from the place of seizure. Considering the fact that the 2 petitioner was not present on the place of seizure, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dalsingsarai (Samastipur), in connection with Vidyapati Nagar P.S. Case No. 84 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The learned court will be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of petitioner, if the petitioner defaults for three consecutive occasions during trial. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)