^NZ^ ^ IN THE HI&H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETTTIQNISLNO.^ <2>5 QF 2011 PETTTIONER L\^^' <^:i3> ~f.•••<''>}-:'"~ ^•"^ •?<''^.- 'i^" Dilip Kumar Pushpakar, S/o. Shri Narendra Pushpakar, Aged about 42 years, R/o. Village Sadshivni, P.S. Tumgaon, Distt. Mahasamund, (C.<5.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Oepartment of Panchayat and Social Welfare, Mantralaya at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C6). 2. Director Panchayat and Social Welfare, near Mantraiaya, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Mahasamund (C.6.) WRIT PETtTEON UNDER ARTECLE 226 OF THE CONSTETUTCON OF INDIA 1. PARTECULARS OF THE PETITIONERS: As stated in the cause title above. 2. PARTCCULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: ^As stated in the cause title above. c^_ ^ HIGH COURTQF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRIT PETmON (S) No. 733 of2011 Dilip Kumar Pushpakar. VERSU8 RESPONDENTS The State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRTT PETmON UNDER AR'IICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satfsh K. Aenlholri, J. Present: Shri Shashauk Thakur, Advocate fw the petitioner. Shri Ajit Sin^i, Panel Lawyer forlfae State/respoiideiit No. 1&2. ORDERfORAL) CPassed on 07°' day of February, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, se^ks pemiission of Ifais Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to altemative statutory forum, that may be available to tiie petitioner underthe provisions oflaw. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objectian. 3. It is ordered accordii^ly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as witfadrawn with the aforestated liberty, ifso advised. Sd/- . , , SatishK.A^hotrl Amit