wp258-10.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.258 OF 2010 Krishnaswamy Narayanan .. Petitioner versus M/s.Kurla Nagarik Sahakari Bank Ltd & Ors .. Respondents Mr.Sureshkumar J. Panicker for the petitioner. Mr.Kishor V.Tembe for respondent No.1. Ms.P.S.Cardozo, A.G.P for respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 17th JUNE 2011. P.C.: . The petitioner applied for summary dismissal of the proceedings under section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. That application having been rejected that this writ petition is filed. 2 After having heard Mr.Panicker appearing for the petitioner, I see no reason to interfere at this stage. The petitioner can argue that no recovery certificate be issued on the basis of the accounts produced by the 1st respondent and even if the application made is dismissed, the Assistant Registrar is bound to wp258-10.doc 2 consider this argument while passing final orders. Further, if final orders are adverse to the petitioner, then, while impugning the same, the petitioner can raise appropriate pleas with regard to dismissal of the application made. Leaving open all contentions of both sides in that behalf, writ petition is dismissed. The Assistant Registrar to make an endeavour to dispose off the proceedings pending before him as expeditiously as possible and by 30th September 2011. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)