IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29750 of 2008 SHEIK ALI SHER @ ALI SHER Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.9.2008 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion. Heard. The petitioner is not named in the FIR of a case under Section 364 IPC. Subsequently, the boy aged about 11 years came out and his statement was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C which is annexed as Annexure-2 to the present petition and as per that statement what at best could be said is that there is no intent or purpose disclosed for sending the boy to Ranchi and getting him employed in a hotel, which could be the only purpose for sending him to Ranchi. It is disputed by the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner that the facts could constitute any offence as is narrated by the alleged victim of the offence. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Jagdish Prasad, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Siwan in Bhagwanpur P.S.Case no.66 of 2007. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )