IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40716 of 2009 SMT.RITA KUMARI & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3. 21-06-2010 Heard Both sides. While assailing the validity of impugned order taking cognizance, it is contended that the prosecution has mala fidely launched the case as it has been filed after filing of the complaint case. i.e. Complaint Case 269(C)/2008 against the husband. It appears from the impugned order that the complainant as well as the witnesses have supported the case made out in the complainant. This court is not impressed with the argument that the present case is a mala fide prosecution as the same has been filed after filing of complainant case no. 269/2008 filed by the present petitioner. This application has no merit. It is accordingly dismissed. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to raise his grievance at the appropriate stage of the case/trial. Fahad. ( Kishore K. Mandal, J)