IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT MONDAY, THE 18TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 29TH MAGHA 1929 Bail Appl..No. 946 of 2008() ---------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------------------- SURAJMAL, S/O. JAISINGHJI PUROHIT, HOUSE NO.43/109, OPPOSITE TO S.N. AUDITIRIUM, AYYAPPANKAVU, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-18. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.ABDUL RASHEED RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. S.U. NAZAR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A.No. 946 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 18th day of February, 2008 O R D E R Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner apprehends arrest on the allegation that he has committed non-bailable offence against an employee of his, one Chinaram. He was an employee working for the petitioner. The said employee had committed embezzlement of funds. He was proceeded against. Apprehending action against him, he in turn, the petitioner apprehends, has filed the complaint of assault. 2. Notice was given to the learned Prosecutor. He submits that though the rival contestants had come before the police with complaints, no crime has been registered as no cognizable offence was revealed. It is reported that the matter has been settled between the parties. In any view of the matter, the police do not want to arrest the petitioner on any allegation raised by the said employee of his, Chinaram. B.A.No. 946 of 2008 2 2. The learned Prosecutor further submits that if on a later date the arrest of the petitioner is found to be necessary on the allegation that he has committed non-bailable offence against the said person prior to this day, sufficient prior notice shall be given to the petitioner and prior permission of this Court shall be taken before any such arrest is effected. The submissions of the learned Prosecutor are taken note of and recorded. The apprehension of the petitioner is, in these circumstances, found to be without any basis. 3. This application is accordingly dismissed accepting the submissions/undertaking of the learned Prosecutor. (R. BASANT) Judge tm