IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.374 of 2010 1. TAJWAR NAUSHAD W/O DR. ASLAM AZAD R/O 306, AT NOOR MENSION APARTMENT, HAROON NAGAR, SECTOR-2, P.S.- PHULWARISHARIFF, DISTT.- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR., PATNA 2. SRI VINAY KUMAR, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR BIHAR STATE ELECTRONICS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, SHASTRINAGAR, PATNA-23 3. SRI SUNIL KUMAR, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER BIHAR STATE ELECTRONICS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, SHASTRINAGAR, PATNA-23 4. SRI VINOD KUMAR, THE MANAGER (MARKETING )-CUM- SECRETARY BIHAR STATE ELECTRONICS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, SHASTRINAGAR, PATNA 5. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRONIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED SHASTRINAGAR, PATNA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY SRI VINOD KUMAR ----------- 05. 29.03.2011 In the light of the orders of this Court dated 27.10.2009 passed in C.W.J.C. No.13637 of 2009 the Board of Directors of the Corporation in its 109th meeting taking into account the profit earned by the Corporation during the year 2007-08 and 2008-09 recommended to the State Government under letter no.7127/09 dated 24.11.2009 Annexure-A to the show cause extension of the age of superannuation of the employees of the Corporation from 58 to 60 years. Finance Department of the State Government, however decided not to extend the age of superannuation of the employees of the Corporation as the Corporation has 2 earned profit for last two years but has not been able to get rid of the accumulated loss. Such decision of the Government is contained in letter no.137 dated 10.2.2010, Annexure-C. In view of the decision of the State Government dated 10.2.2010, Annexure-C, I am not inclined to proceed with the contempt petition, which is, accordingly, disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the decision of the Government dated 10.2.2010, Annexure-C. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)