.^^' \w fflCai OOURT OF OfflATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIQNERS WritPettttmNu,, 5 ofMl 1. Saryoo Vrasad Paffiak, S/o Shrilsant PathA, aged about 58 years, R/o B-4/1 Mai Qiarters Meri Col<ny, Nasik (M.S.). 2. Shisfair Kumar Prthak, S/o S.P. Padiak, aged about 28 years R/at E-21/125 BDA MIG Ftots, Dondur Bangalare-71. VERSUS 1. State ofChihatt @ab dffou^i Seaietary, Deptt. ofHome, D.K. Bhawaa, Raq)W. 2. SupCTintetdent ofPolice, Baipur. 3. Statiou House 0 Ger, PoUw St^ion-Kotwali Raipur, Distt. Raipur(CG). (WMT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE OONSTnunON OF INDIA) (8B: Hon'I^Mr.8atishK.Agrihi»(ri,J.) Pr^eat : Shri Arvind Dubey, Advocate forthe petitionera. Shri Vivek Sharma, Panel Lawyer for Ae State/re^ondents. RESPQNDENTS ORALORDER (Passed on 13th ofDecember,2007) (1) Learued counsel appearing fm tiie petitioners subnats that tfais petition has become infiuctuous, to vWch teamed ooiuisel appearing for tte State/respotideids has no otojedton. (2) B is ordered accordii^ly. (3) The writ petition is dismissed as having becwne infinctuous. No order asto costs. ——— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge sahu