IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31845 of 2010 1. MITHILESH JHA @ MITHLESH JHA 2. SAKUNI DEVI @ JHAKUNI DEVI ------------------------ PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 28.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Strange that having specific allegation, husband is allowed bail by the Sessions Judge and married Nanad and her husband are refused bail. Considering the facts and circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, Samastipur in Hathauri P.S. Case No. 56 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)