1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7672 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri Ganesh Gole for the Petitioners. Shri C. D’Souza i/by RKM Legal for Resondent Nos.1 to 3. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 29th January 2010. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners. By the impugned order, the chamber summons taken out by the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 who are the original Plaintiffs has been made absolute by which the present Petitioners have been permitted to be impleaded as party Defendants. 2. After having heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners and after perusing the plaint, I find no error in the impugned order. Addition of the parties is sought to be made on the ground that the added Defendants are the transferees of the suit property during the pendency of the suit. The Plaintiffs are dominus 2 litis and they have chosen to implead the Petitioners who are the transferees during the pendency of the suit as party Defendants. Therefore, no fault can be found with the impugned order. However, all defences of the Petitioners are kept open and it will be open for the Petitioners to file Written Statement and raise all permissible defences . 3. Subject to what is observed above, the Writ Petition is rejected. If the Written Statement is not filed by the Petitioners, the same shall be filed within a period of eight weeks from today. (A.S.OKA,J)