pvr 1 lpa32-33-11-11 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.32 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10077 OF 2010 Shri.Rajendra Laxman Bhosale. ...Appellant vs. 1.The Nashik District Central Co-op.Bank Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents --- Mr.N.V.Walawalkar, Sr.Advocate i/b. Mr.Suresh Sabrad, for the Appellant. Mr.P.K.Dhakephalkar,Sr.Advocate i/b. Mr.A.S.Desai, for Respondent no.1. And LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.33 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.285 OF 2011 Shri.Chandrakant Lumchand Gogad ...Appellant vs. 1.The Nashik District Central Co-op.Bank Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents --- pvr 2 lpa32-33-11-11 Mr.Y.S.Jahagirdar, Sr. Advocate i/b. Mr.Amit Borkar, for the Appellant. Mr.P.K.Dhakephalkar,Sr.Advocate i/b. Mr.A.S.Desai, for Respondent no.1. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED: 23rd February,2011 P.C.: 1. Admit. Heard finally by consent of parties. 2. By consent of parties the order of the learned Single Judge declining to grant interim relief is set aside. The learned Single Judge is requested to hear the parties again on the question of granting appropriate interim relief to operate during the pendency of the petition. The learned Single Judge shall be at liberty, if pvr 3 lpa32-33-11-11 he is so inclined, to hear the petition itself finally. Considering that the petition involved important public interest, the learned Single Judge is requested to hear the parties either on the question of interim relief or on the final disposal of the petition at an early date, as far as possible within a period of four weeks from today. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (K.K.TATED,J.)