IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF C.G. AT BILASPUR W.P. (2271 No. €^ of 2010 ^^0-'" ^'^ PETITIONER/ Defendant ,/° .. .^? b^y^ ...v:^^y" p'^y" ^ Hmialaya Commercial Complex Private Limited, Supela Bhilai, District-Durg (C.G.) through Chairman- Santosh Golchha, S/o Late Shri K.C. Golchha, aged about 54 years, R/o Usha Kiran Malviya Nagar, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.) ^' VERSUS RESPONDENT/ Plaintiff Meharban Singh, S/o Shri Darshan Singh, aged about 40 years, R/o Quarter No. 22, Sindhi Colony, Raipur Naka, Durg, Tahsil & District-Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UND^^ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA T 3?1^? ^? f^fNF ^^? ^n^r ^^Nr ^ '3-s[ ^i^i<nq, ^Til-y^Ko, [si<ni-(-i^< . <^>P.(^L^)^^- 5>6 S<| \o WR^'SFqt^ ' T ^^ -^ 3TI^?T 'T^RT ( ^I^^) ^?TOT1R^T^?^?l <s»)l^t<n<^1"RTR^f "^ 'fe^ iFt^K °^3ifW3?lt^ SB: Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumak* Mishra, J. 1,10.2010 Shri Prateek Shai-ma, counse| forthe petitioner. The trial court has reje^ted petitioner/defendant's objection regarding maintainability of the s|iit. Tlie objection was raised on the submission that there exists an arb^ into between fhe parties, therefore tt ^bitration and Conciliation Act, 19|96. Ifthe instant petition is allo^ the effect ofdisniissal ofthe suit its^ The impugned order is amel this court iinder section 115 ot mamtainable. Shri Prateek Sharma, lemii peiimssion ofthe court to withdra^ duly constituted civil revision under| [ration clause m the agreement entered |e suit is barred underthe provisions of ?ed in favour ofpetitioner, it will have If. piable to the revisional jurisdiction of CPC. The mstant petition is not ^d courisel for the petitioner seeks the writ petition with liberty to file a sectionll5ofCPC. Permission granted. Writ petition is dismissed as ^ithdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. It is directed that on the pet| impugned order, the certified copy | liim. itioner's supplying xerox copy ofthe of the impugned order be retumed to Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge