1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1407 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 368 OF 2001 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr. Niranjan Shimpi, for the applicants. Mr A.V.Anturkar, appellant in S.A. And respondent in C.A. Ms Pallavi Dabholkar for respondent no.10B and 11(6). CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 14/12/2010. PC: Heard learned counsel for the parties. The applicants, in this civil application, have prayed for vacating the interim order and in the alternative for fixing the appeal for final hearing. Mr Shimpi, learned counsel for the applicants, on instructions, submits that in view of the ad-interim order passed by this court, the executing authority is not proceeding with the execution. As a matter of fact,when rule was issued on T 2 the civil application and the ad-interim order was passed, it was made clear that delivery of possession only was stayed. In view thereof, the executing authority ought to have proceeded to complete the execution proceedings except delivery of possession. In the circumstances, this civil application is disposed of by the following order: The executing authority shall complete the execution proceedings, except delivery of possession of the vacant suit land. If the appeal is ready for final hearing, office is directed to place it for final hearing in the week commencing from 3.4.2011. Printing is dispensed with. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)