IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.64 of 2008 ARBIND KUMAR VERMA Versus SANJU DEVI & ANR ----------- 2 05.09.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Shukla, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would submit that while he will not object to the order of the Court below granting cost of litigation which is in keeping with spirit under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act but then he apprehends that the order of the Court below of Rs. 200/- for each and every fixed day may be exploited or become too expensive for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, such submission of Mr. Shukla has some force. In that view of the matter while this Court would not interfere with the impugned order, it would give liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court below by filing a fresh application for reconsideration of this amount and the Court below will be at liberty to pass a fresh order with regard to cost of litigation either by making it consolidated amount, which must be reasonable and/or even by retaining the said amount but making it payable for an effective date of hearing of the case instead of each and every day. With the aforementioned observations and directions this Civil Revision application is disposed of. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)