IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.26616 of 2011 Mannu Paswan son Late Ram Dayal Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2/ 08.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 467, 419, 468 and120-B of the Indian Penal Code. The complainant alleged that a certain piece of land had been sold to one Poonam Gupta by accused Ajit Kumar and Dinesh Singh in which the petitioner was a witness on the sale deed. Subsequently, the said Poonam Gupta also filed a case stating therein that she had been cheated by Ajit Kumar and Dinesh Singh by having been sold the land which did not belong to the persons they had claimed. Considering that both the complainant and Poonam Gupta, the subsequent purchaser, have alleged fraud having been committed on them by a certain document on which the petitioner was a signatory, I am not inclined to grant him anticipatory bail. Prayer for bail is rejected. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)