:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7855 OF 2007 Shri Mohammed Aslam Abdul Latif Mukri and Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Shri Abdulla Abdul Rehman Raut and Ors. ....Respondents Mr.S.G.Kudale, Adv. for the petitioners. Ms.P.S.Cardozo, AGP for respondent nos.7 and 8. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 16th January, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. Heard Mr.Kudale, appearing for the petitioner. Perused the order passed by the Trial Court and the lower appellate court. The application for interim injunction has been rejected mainly on the ground of :2: :2: :2: delay in approaching the civil court. Merely because the interim application is rejected does not mean that the petitioners plaintiffs are precluded from proving their right, title and interest in the subject property. All observations have been made at a prima-facie stage. The suit would be decided on its own merits and in accordance with law. Needless therefore to state, that all actions of the defendants to the suit shall be subject to the outcome of the suit and they will have to abide by the final orders in the suit. In the peculiar facts of this case, hearing of Reg.Civil Suit No. 217 of 2005 is expedited. Liberty to apply. Petition disposed off. sd/- ********