1 S.B.Cr.Misc. IInd Bail App. No.5117/2007 (Sukha Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : February 19, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Anand Purohit, for the petitioner. Mr.J.P.S.Choudhary, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the challan papers. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no allegation of demand of dowry or subjecting the deceased to cruelty in connection with demand of dowry. However, some of the witnesses stated that the petitioner used to keep the bad eye on the deceased. Be that as it may, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the ingredients of section 304-B I.P.C. are not made out. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and having perused the statements of the witnesses, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Sukha Ram 2 s/o Keshra Ram be released on bail in FIR No.169/2007, P.S., Ratangarh, Distt. Churu provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-