IN THE HIGH COI3RT OF JUD!CATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR . ‘ MA. Ne. $ 6 g /2a93 §§mw '7 Emggg “LAIfons Ekaa ${o Bifaiya ,Aged about 35 years x APPELLANT / 2<Mohan S/oBudhu ,Aged abom 57 years ;. 3.Jogi SIO Pati , Aged about 59 years I. .a ’{g‘y 4 Heiena SI o Sukhana Aged about 3O years a?! Gopal S/e iethu Aged about 30 years Occupatmn all — Cuitwator ¢P‘§¢* % R/o :- Vin. Jamira , Post. Jamira, Thana ‘ ‘ . ..’.' Kusumi , Tah. Kusumi DisttSarguja [C.G.] 65‘ gy b¥§ VERSUS RESPONDENTS .R/ashidan Bi’W/o it. Mehaboeb, Aged About 45 years ’ Applicantimasment / 1 & 9 respectiveiy 2mm. Afjas S/o It. Mehboob,Aged about 32 yrs R/oWKarkaiLRS‘Kusumi DisttSarguja [C.G.] Nan — App!icant N0. 6 n3i8hiva Oran @ sitaram Sic Heera Sai x/ ' ff Aged about 32 years ,Occupation : Driver R10 Vils.Darripar Tah. & Rs Kusumi Dist-t. Sarguja {(16.1 Non - Applicant No. 7 , , 4 United insurance Co ftd / Offrce ear Ram Mandrr Ambrkapur APPEAL UIS 173 O? “THE MO?OR VEHICLE ACT \ XX XLHC- 22 v I Wm 'gi 200 When the matter is called out, Mr. Arun K. Shukla, counsel for the appellantjs not/present. Oh the last date of hearing appellant to maké'goo‘cl thé defa payable to the High Coult Bar A cost, as directed, is not paid, the is present nor it is proved that Rs.‘ Association nor the default has ' stands dismissed. i.e.. 13/11/2003 time was granted to the t and that too subject of cost of R550!» sociation and further directed that if the peal stands dismissed. Neither counsel 50l- is deposited with the High Court Bar been made good. Therefore, the appeal //r / t " ss- Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge WeW . ma , M W 1mm m mmmm $ Wing? \ 1 910312004