IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37385 of 2011 Jai Rai, S/O-Ramji Rai Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03 25.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner was earlier granted privilege of bail but he committed misuse of his privilege of bail as a result of which his bail bond was cancelled on 15.05.1997. Subsequently, he could be remanded by the court below on 13.06.2011. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that, as a matter of fact, the case of the petitioner was committed to the court of Sessions in the year 1991 and he faced his trial till 1997 and after that he went to Gujrat in connection with his livelihood after entrusting his pairvi to his family members but unfortunately, his family members left the pairvi of the petitioner resulting cancellation of his bail bonds. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-II, Patna City in connection with Sessions Trial No. 220 of 1991 arising out of Fatuha P.S. Case No. 115 of 1989 subject to condition that one of the sureties must be close relative of the petitioner and furthermore, petitioner shall attend the trial court on each and every date in person for the period of one year or till 2 conclusion of his trial, whichever is earlier and if he fails to do so on three consecutive dates without any genuine cause, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)