IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 8TH JUNE 2010 / 18TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 17798 of 2010(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- DR. A.KHAIRUNNIZA, CONSULTANT IN GYNECOLOGY, TALUK HEAD QUARTERS HOSPITAL, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DIST. BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DR. RAJENDRA PRASAD, CONSULTANT IN GYNECOLOGY, GENERAL HOSPITAL, ERNAKULAM. SR.G.P.SRI.P.NANDAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 8/6/2010, THE COURT ON 08/06/2010 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.17798 of 2010 (Y) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 8th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T As a consequence of implementation of the Government Order regarding the constitution of Speciality Cadre and the order of this Court dated 09/04/2010, the petitioner, who is a Consultant in Gynaecology and posted at Taluk Head Quarters Hospital Cherthala, has been posted to Taluk Head Quarters Hospital, Aluva. The petitioner points out that the 3rd respondent, a Consultant in Gynaecology, who was posted at General Hospital Ernakulam has been posted to Cherthala in her place. What she requests is that the 3rd respondent may be shifted to Aluva and she may be retained at Cherthala. 2. The petitioner has filed Ext.P5 representation before the 1st respondent seeking modification of the transfer and postings in the manner as suggested above. These are matters for the 1st respondent to deal with, and this Court will not be justified in upsetting the orders at this stage. It is seen that transfer orders WP(C) No.17798/2010 -2- have already come into effect. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner confines her request for an expeditious consideration of Ext.P5. 4. I heard the learned Government Pleader also. 5. As already seen, this grievance is to be considered by the 1st respondent and therefore, it is only appropriate that the 1st respondent should consider Ext.P5. This the 1st respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition. It is clarified that any order affecting the 3rd respondent shall be passed only after issuing notice and hearing him also. This writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE.