<^^\^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRITPETITION(SlNO.r7\^ /2011. PETITIONER: v^%?s- ""^''^y .y^ "^.^•"..-" •<" ..r •-0" Resoondents Rajkumar Sarthi, son of Kirthi Vas Sarthi, agKed about 55 years, working as Priraary School Head Master, Govt. Primary School, Panchpara, Block Pussoiir, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. i/ersus -1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhatdsgarh. 2. District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhatdsgarh. 3. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 QFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER(S): As mendoned in the Cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENT(S1: As mentioned in the Cause title. 3. PARTICULARS OF THE CAUSE/ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE PETITION IS MADE. SUBJECT MATTER IN BRIEP. .-rS'Bn'a H'GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.1719 OF 2011 PETITIONEI RESPQNDENTS Raikumar Sarthi Versus State of Chhattisgarh & others pA/rit Petition under Artlcte 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate for the petitloner. Shri Sushil Dubev, Government Advocate for the State. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on this 30th day of Mareh, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petittoner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage, and prays for withdrawal of this petition with iiberty to make a representation in the light of the circular dated 5.1.2011 (Annexure P/2). 3. Learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the State/respondents submits that if a representation is made, the same shall be considered and decided within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, in the light of the above- stated circular. 4. In vlew of foregoing, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above-stated liberty. !t is expected that the concerned authorities would consider and decide the representation, if any, as above, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a copy ofthis order. Sd/- Satish^-Judge ashok