j«i' "^i" Uii.£ •D{:S -(?^/CTB2_ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G) W.P. (S) N0. ^'t° / 2007 PETITIONER ~i: ??''.*'' ^^/ "''<^ ^; RESPONDENTS 1 ^i ^i^^i^r >-p.(^-'B'.nl'' .^\s9 ip' ^ A\\ .^.G* G.^! Badrika Prasad Dansena Aged about 45 Years, S/o. Shri Ram Subran Dansena, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Dumarpali, Distt. Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director Public Instruction Department Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Janjgir-Champa District Jangir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUIONOF INDIA o XI-HC-78 HIMMI 5h*1|ch TS? •-tfWM'tf, W<S\W[S, IslMiyy IS-'P-CV -S-40/07 •l- ^R; 200 311^1 4^* ('{^3^T) aiT^TiRrf^riq; (raTSIIWshllf Bablu \ '^) gCTWHfscrsn^T 18.1.2007 Mr. Anil Mourya, counsel foi^ Miss Sunita Jain, Panel lawy^r for the respondents/State. With the consent of leame^l counsel for the parties, the matters are heard finally and disposed of. Common order dictated in V( passed separately. A copy of this order be pla^sd °n t^cofd in other connected writ petitions. »bl<lfa41-f*11K<-lTffte^'<[a|«K ^iSlf^tTSn^T the petitioners. '.P. (s) No. 237 of 2007 in open Court, Sd/- Satish K.Agiuhotri Judge P.T.O. 'ls) HI6H COUftT OF CHHATnS&WH AT BILASPUR W P fS) No. 237 of 2007 Petitioner : Roop Lal Patel Versus Re^wndents ; State of Chhutt-isgarh and o-thers W P.fS)No. 239 of 2007 iPetitioner : JeevanLal Banjare Versus 1 Respondents ; State of Chhattisgarh ond others W P.(S)No. 240 of 2007 Petitioner ; Badrika Pnasad Oansena Versus Respondents ; Stateof Chhattisgarh and others W P.fS) No. 243 of 20)7 Petitioner : Ku. Urmila Sao Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others W. P.fSlNo 244 of 2007 IPetH-ioner : Smt. Swimmoni Tirkey Versus |Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh and others And W. P.fSlNo 245of2W7 Petitioners : TeekaRanrOansenaandanother Versus Respondents : Stnteof Chhatt-isgarh and o-rtiers SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish IC. Agnihotri. J Present: Mr. Anil Mourya, counsel for the petitioners. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ^) 1 OR&ER > (Passed ontiiis 18th Day of January, 2007) r The following order of the Courf' is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. Learped counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as leomed Panel lawyer for the State/respohdents jointly submit that the facts of the II . ;. , ; . • . ^ ^. . ;. - \ pres^nf writ petition is sjmiiar to that of in W. P. No,1463/2006 'tl i (Aeman Jain vs. The State 6ovemment of Chhuttis9arh d another), r • ' • • ' . ' . •.•'.''• 1: . ' .''..'•.'. ' • ' • which was dispo»d pf vide order dated 10.11.2006. They further subfflit that the question of taw involved is also -the same. 1. 2. In view of the above stated submissions macle by leamed counsel for F ' the part-ies, these writ petitions ore disposed of terms of the order datetl 10.11.2006 passed by this Court in 1463/2006 (Aeman Jain vs. The S^ate fiovemment of Chhatt-isgarh A another). No order as to costs. Bablu 3. A copy of this order be piaced on record in other connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge "?^,,;y)C^