IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 14567 of 2009 Between: KRCR Constructions rep by its Managing Partner Shri Karri Ramchandra Reddy, S/o. Late Kari Adireddy, aged 56 years, Flat No.a-4, Sri Nirmala Residency, Veerabhadrapuram, Rajahmundry, E.G.District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari at Kakinada. 2 Dy. Superintendent of Police, East Godavari at Kakinada. 3 Station House Officer, III-Town Police Station (Law & Order), Kakinada, East Godavari District. 4 The District collector, East Godavari, Kakinada. 5 Revenue Divisional Officer, Kakinada, E.G.District. 6 Dasari Yacob, S/o. Moses, C/o. Smt Venkata Ramamma, 1st Street, Noble College, Road, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction, moe particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 and 5, on their own, or at th einstance of others, from in any manner interfereing with the petitioenrs peaceful possession and enjoyment of the proeprty of an extent of 5668.88 square yards situated in TS Nos. 5 and 7 Ward No.3, Block No.1, Ramaraopeta, Kainada purchased by the petitioer vide document No.8616 of 2007 dated 20.06.2007, as corrected by the Registered Rectification Deed bearing document No.4618 f 2009 dated 17-06-2009 Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.SIVANANDA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 14567 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner approached this court and filed the present Writ Petition stating that the police are unnecessarily interfering with his peaceful possession over the property in question and are trying to settle the civil disputes between the petitioner and the fifth respondent. On instructions, the learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that the police never interfered with the civil disputes of the petitioner and the fifth respondent and on mere apprehension only the petitioner filed the present Writ Petition. Recording the said statement of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the police concerned not to interfere with the civil disputes of the petitioner and the fifth respondent without following due process under law. ------------------ 20.08.2009 kvsn