HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISOARH AT BILASPUR APPLICANT NON-APPUCANTS VERSUS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. MCC. N0. 468/2009 Sadhu aged 60 years, son of Shri Siikhru, resident of vUlage Bhalpahari, P.0. Kudurmal, tahsil Katghora, district Korba (CG.). (AppellantNo. 1) Bharosh, aysd 50 years, soa of Dukhru, resident of BALCO Nagar, Bhadrapara, tahsU and distnct Korba (C.G.). State of Chhattisgarh, tbrough the CoUector, Korba. Jethu, a^ed 45 years, son ofSukhdas, Tirfhrant, aged 40 years, son of Sukhdas, Baratram, afed 35 years, scai of Sukhdas, Parasram, aged 30 years, son of Sukhdas, AU are residents of viBage Bhalpahflri, tehsit Kalghora, distdct Korba (C.G.). MaUkram, aged 50 years, son of Siikhdas, resident of BALCO Nagar, Bhadrapara, tahsil and district Korba (C.G,). APPLICATION UNDBR ORDER 41 RULE 19 OF THB CODB OF CIVIL PROCBDURE. 1908 FOR RE-ADMISSIOM OF APPBAL DI8MI8SED ON DEFAULT ON 10/7/2009. (SB :Hoa'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) .A. Present:-. Shri Somnath Verma, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Ajeet Singh, P.L. for the State/non-appUcant N0. 2. ORAL- ORDER (Passedon 30/10/2009) Heard on I.A. No. 01, AppUcation for condonation aad extension ofdelay uader order 41 Riile 3-A of fhe Code of CivU F'rocedure, 1908 Read wifh Section 5 offhe LiinitationAct, 1963. Prcsent appUcation has been preferred after 79 days ofits Uinitatioa. t. 3. On due consideration, I am satisfied that appUcant is succeeded in explam the delay ia filing the appUcatioa. Consequentty, I.A. No. 01 is aUowed. Delay in. filing fhe application is hercby condoned. 4. Also heard on restoration application. 5. Leamed counsel for the appUcation subatits fhat due to uaavoidable cause represeatation has notbeen niade at the tiine ofheariag ofappeaL 6. Takiug in to consideration the groimds mentioned ia the application, the restoration application is aUowed. S.A. No. 182/2001 disnussed forwant of prosecutiou vide order dated 10/7/2009 is hereby restored ia its original number. ^———-._„ 7. No order as to costs. I - : TR Sharma 1 Judge