IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27379 of 2008 ABDUL MATIN & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.08.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offences under Sections 498A and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted that the allegations are general in nature and the petitioner no.1 has filed an application for restitution of conjugal rights as would be evident from Annexure-2. Petitioner no. 2 and 3 are father-in-law and mother-in-law respectively. Considering the nature of allegation made in the complaint with regard to demand, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner No2, Abdul Kalam and petitioner No.3, Matluba Khatoon be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Katihar in connection with complaint Case No. CA 682/2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Considering the allegation made in the complaint as against petitioner no.1, Abdul Matin, I am not inclined to grant bail to petitioner no.1. Accordingly, the same is rejected. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)