IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25795 of 2010 SHIVJEE PANDEY @ SHEOJEE PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 12.10.2010 Petitioner is languishing in custody since 02.01.2010 in a case registered under Sections 394, 411 of the I.P.C. Petitioner’s name sprang up on the confession of the co-accused. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that recovery has been made from one Hari Mahto and not from the petitioner. The criminal antecedent report suggests that petitioner is involved in two other cases apart from the present one. The report of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Motihari dated 10th of August, 2010 suggests that trial is likely to be concluded within a period of two months. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present. The prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 85 of 2000. If the trial is not concluded for no latches on 2 the part of the petitioner by January, 2011, then the same will be good ground for consideration of bail by learned Trial Court. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)