1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application No. 3464 of 2007 in MCA (Review) St. No.5436 of 2007 in W.P.No.5995 of 2005 (D) (Ashok Ganpatrao Kamble .vs. The Divisional Social Welfare Officer, Amravati Division, Amravati & 3 Ors.) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha and R.V.More, JJ. DATE : December 14, 2007. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3464 OF 2007 Heard Mr. Firdos Mirza, counsel for the Applicant and Mr.Sonak, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent/State. This Civil Application is moved by the applicant for condonation of delay in filing the review application. Considered the contentions canvassed by the respective parties. Perused the application. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, delay is condoned. Application is accordingly allowed. M.C.A.(Review) Stamp No.5436 of 2007 Heard Mr. Firdos Mirza, counsel for the Applicant 2 and Mr.Sonak, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent/State and perused the impugned order. Perusal of the impugned order shows that the claim of the petitioner for relaxation of age in view of clause (a) of Rule (4) of Rule 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 was not possible and therefore, the Writ Petition was dismissed. This aspect has not been disputed. In that view of the matter, the review petition suffers from lack of merits. Hence, the same is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE ssj