9 b \ In the High Couft of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur WP (S) _ M q“ Q5 / 2011 Petitioner ‘ Vishnu Verma, Aged 46 Yrs. S/ o Late Devnath Verma, Dubey Colony, Mowa, Street # 6, Raipur CG Versus Vipmm Board, Raipur. E’). Deputy Commissioner cum Census Charge Officer, Nagar Palika Nigam, Raipur Petition Under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India C Respondents 1./State of Chhattisgarh, thro’ Secretary, Deptt. Of Agriculture, W’Mantralaya, Raipur. 2. Managing Director, Chhattisgarh ‘ Rajya Krishi HIGH COURT OF CHHA’I’TISGARH AT BILASPUR 477 WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 478 0f2011 PE'I‘I’I‘IONER : Vishnu Velma. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. RESPONDEN’I‘S PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTI’I‘U’I‘ION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Present: Shri Raja Shanna Advocate for the petitioner. Shli Ajay Dwivodi, Deputy Govennnent Advocate for the. State/respondent No. 1. ‘ Shri Vikrant Singh, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 12’1‘ day ofMay, 201 1) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue oftransfer, involved in this petition, has come to an end on account of the fact that census work is over. Thus, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. However, the petitioner wishes to make a representation to the respondent authorities for other consequential benefits. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side have no objection. 3. Since there is no prayer for grant of consequential‘ benefits in the petition, it is not necessary to grant any permission to make a representation. It‘the petitioner wants to make a representation, he is free to do so. 4. Accordingly, the Writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. it’so advised. Sd/-' Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit