IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. WRIT PETITION LODGING NO.2279 OF 2005 Rajendra Vinayak Shirgaonkar & Anr..Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors.Respondents Petitioner No.2 present in person. Mr. P.G. Lad for the Respondent No.1. Mr. J.P. Cama, Senior Advocate with Ms. N.P. Karnik, for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Ms. N.D. Buch with Ms. B.B. Dholakia, for respondent No.7. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & F.I. REBELLO & F.I. REBELLO & DR. DR. DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : : : 24th January,2006 P.C.: . On behalf of the respondent learned Counsel draws our attention to the order dated 15th February, 2005 in Application (ICTU) No.2/2005 whereby the contesting office bearers as well as the Union agreed to hold fresh elections. Learned Counsel points out that the elections have been held and the counting is fixed on 27th January, 2006. 2. The petitioner herein in the reference made in the matter of records of the Union had sought impleadment as a party. That has been rejected. Considering the subsequent events we do not think this to be a fit case where we should exercise our extra ordinary jurisdiction. Nothing further will survive before the Industrial Court. Even otherwise in a dispute between the office bearers and in respect of the records of the Union we do not see how the petitioner herein is proper or necessary party. Hence, no case for interference. Petition rejected. (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.) (DR. (DR. (DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.) D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.) D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)