t.''?' IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.No. ^^-/2009 APPLICANTS PETITIONERS ^ft^ Vi t.»> ..a^ ^ ¥f^ NON-APPLICANTS RESPONDENTS 1. SanjeevKumar Singh » S/o Shri Nageshwgr Singh Aged about 35 years 2. Raj Narayart Yadav S/o Shri Dayaram Yadav Agedabout 36 years 3. Virendra Choudhary S/o Shri Ramchandra Choudhary, aged about 36 years 4. Pramod Singh ., S/o Shri Gojo Singh, aed about 36 years 5. Jitendra Bahadur Patel ^ S/o Shri Mewa Ram, aged'about 34 years 6. Shriram Singh Yadav S/o Shri Harhangi Singh, aged about 35 years 7. Ramraj Kumar S/o Shri Banshilal, aged about 34 years All residents Bishrampur, Tehsil Surguja, Dist. Surguja Chhattisgarh 8. Jawaharlal Rajwade • S/o Shri Jairam Rajwade Aged about27 years, resident of Village Kumda Basti, Tehsil Syrajpur, District Surguja •• Chhattisgarh 9. Rajendra Prasad Jaiswal ^. ' S/o Shri R. C. Jaiswal, resident of ^illage Karanwa, Tehsil Surguja, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh VERSUS 1. Union of India Through Secretary Ministry of Coal, New Delhi / wl B 2. Chairman Coal India Limited Kolkata, West Bengal 3. Chairman-cum-Managing Director, South Eastern Coal Fields Ltd., Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4. General Manager South Eastern Coal Fields Ltd., Bishrampur Area, Bishrampur, Dist. Surguja, Chhattisgarh 5. Collector District Surguja, Post Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh 6. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Surguja, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh . 7. Ramanand, S/o Shri Raghu Aged about 36 years, resident of Village Kamlapur, Tehsil and District Surguja, Chhattisgarh 8. Sheo Balak, S/o Raghu Aged about 34 years, resident ofVillage Kamlapur, Tehsil and District Surguja, Chhattisgarh APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF W.P.(S) No. 6701/2007 PASSED^BY HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI S.K. AGNIHOTRI • ^^ *» HIOH GOURTORGHHA'rNSGARHiBILASPUR M. C._C. No. 107 of 2009 Applicants Respondente Versus Saajeev Kumar Siagh & others Union of India & others APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF W.P. tS\ No. 6701/2007 (SB: Hon'ble SImSatishK. AgmhotriJ.) ShriAinrito Das, Advocate fortheapplicants/petitioners, Shri I^aghvehdra Pradhaa, Advocate forthe respoiideuf No.l. Shri Viaod DesIunuMt, Advoeate forfhe respondents No. 2, 3& 4. SIu-i Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel Lawyerfor fhe respolidentsNo. 7 &8. ORDBRIotalt (Passed onfhis 11th dayof December, 2009) Heard. 1. The applicaats have filed this appUcation for restoration of fhe Writ Petition(S)No. 6701/2007 (Sanjeev Kumar Siagh Vs. Union of India & others), which was disnussed under the preemptory clause by order dated 24.4.2008, which reads as uader: "At fhe request pf learaed couiisel appearing for the petitioners, twoweeks time is graated to make good fhe defaults as poiuted out by the ofBce, faiting which fhe niatter shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution, without referenGe to the Court." 2. Learued counsel appearing for ftie respondents subaiits that if the delay is condoned in the facts situation of the case, they have ao objection. 3. The applicati.on dated 20.3.2009 (I.A.No. 1) for condonation of delay in filing application for restpratfon of the writ petition, isi 'ordered, asprayed fin-. The delay is CQndoned. y 2-- 4. ReasoDableand suf&cient cause has been. shown. The Writ Petition (S) No. 6701/2007 may be restored to the origmal ffle, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 1000/- to the High Cpurt Legal Aid Comiaittee, within a period of two weeks. 5. In view of the above ftie application is disposed of. A copy of fhis order may be placed on record ia Writ Petition (S) No. , ,6701/2007 andfhesame niay be listed for hearing. ThAur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri" Judge 'Y -..•l1