IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.999 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 02.08.2007 in W.P.NO.23046 OF 2006 on the ﬁle of the High Court.) Between: 1 M/s.Sai Krupa Wines, Manthani Village and Mandal, Karimnagar District, represented by its Sri R.Nagabushanam, s/o Lingaiah, r/o Manthani Village and Mandal, Karimnagar District. 2 M/s.Sri Venkateswara Wines, Manthani Village, Mandal Manthani, karimnagar District, rep., by its Sri N.Srinivas, s/o Sarangapani, r/o Manthani Village and Mandal, Karimnagar District. 3 M/s.Sri Sai Wines, Manthani Village, Manthani Mandal, Karimnagar District, represented by M.Ravi, s/o Gattu Raju, r/o Manthani Village and Mandal, Karimnagar District. ...APPELLANTS AND 1 The District Collector, karimnagar District. 2 The Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise, Peddapally, Karimnagar District. 3 The Superintendent, Prohibition & Excise, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. 4 M.Prasad Rao, r/o Manthani Village and Mandal, Karimnagar District. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants: MR.SUDARSHAN REDDY DUDDUGUNTA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court delivered the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.999 of 2008 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Mr Justice B.Prakash Rao) Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the subject matter under the Writ Appeal has become infructuous. Recording the submission, without going into the merits of the case, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) ________________ (R.KANTHA RAO, J) 9th September 2008 RRB