IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU MONDAY, THE 15TH JANUARY 2007 / 25TH PAUSHA 1928 WP(C).No. 241 of 2007(S) ------------------------ OA.856/2005 of CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,ERNAKULAM BENCH .................... PETITIONER: -------------- 1. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NEW DELHI. 2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, C.R.BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD, COCHIN. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRICHUR. BY ADV. SRI.JOHN VARGHESE, ASSISTANT SG RESPONDENTS: ------------------ SMT.T.N.SANTHAKUMARI, OFFICE SUPERINTENDENT, OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-II, TRICHUR. BY / THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.A. ABDUL GAFOOR & K.R. UDAYABHANU, JJ ============================= W.P. (C). NO. 241 OF 2007 ============================== Dated this the 15th day of January 2007 JUDGMENT Abdul Gafoor,J The Reporting Officer had rated the service of the incumbent as very good. But the Reviewing Officer did not agree with the remarks of the Reporting Officer. One among the reasons stated is that the incumbent had been applying for leave on medical certificate and without showing any reason for leave. Anyhow, the Tribunal had considered all these issues and has decided that the remarks of the Reviewing Officer had to be expunged. In the circumstances, this is not at all a fit case for interference. Necessarily the incumbent will be entitled to all his entitlement as if there was no such entry. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly. K.A. ABDUL GAFOOR, JUDGE K.R. UDAYABHANU, JUDGE. RV