IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.42751 of 2010 BISHNU NARAYAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH VIGILANCE ----------- 3/ 26.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. During the service period of petitioner, a trap was conducted for receiving bribe that lead to check his income after his coming in service since 20.12.1999 till 2009. Disproportionate assets is found of Rs. 6,83,770/-. Submission is about non- counting of his income worked in TISCO and amount received on his final settlement along with L.I.C. and bonus that amount comes to Rs. 5,04,740/-. Apart from it, submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner has some agricultural land anyhow the amount disproportionate assets is not big rather within two lakhs even non-enclosure of the agricultural income for such an amount refusal of petitioner’s anticipatory bail is not proper. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Special Case No. 31 of 2010 arising out of Vigilance P.S. Case No. 47 of 2010 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of Special Judge, Vigilance-I, Patna subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)