IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH OCTOBER 2010 / 14TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 30715 of 2010(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. MIDHUN SANKAR, S/O.K.G.SANKARAN, KURLIYATH HOUSE, KOORKENCHERY (P.O), THRISSUR. 2. VISHNU PRAKASH P.J., S/O.JYOTHI PRAKASH, KANDIYATH HOUSE, PUDUSSERY, VILAYODI P.O., CHITTUR, PALAKKAD, PIN CODE - 678 103. 3. SREE MAHA VISHNU DAS T.R., S/O.T.RAMAKRISHNAN, QTR NO.6, FIFTH FLOOR, BSNL BUILDING, PALAKKAD, PIN CODE - 678 014. 4. SANDIP.K., S/O.SELVARAJ, WEST NALUR HOUSE, MANNALUR P.O., PALAKKAD, PIN CODE - 678 502. 5. FAYAZ RAJA.F., S/O.N.C.FAROOK, BLOSSOM POOKKARATHOTTAM, OLAVAKKODE, PALAKKAD. 6. FARIZ BAIG.S., S/O.SHABARIZ ALI BAIG, B/14, LULU MAHAL, HILL VIEW, NAGARPUDUPARIYARAM (P.O), PALAKKAD, PIN CODE - 678 733. 7. AJITHKUMAR.A., S/O.OMANA, AJINIVAS, ELAYAVARMBATH HOUSE, PALLATHERI P.O., PALAKKAD, PIN CODE - 678 007. 8. HARIKRISHNAN.V., S/O.A.N.VENUGOPAL, KRISHA SUMALAYAM HOUSE, MATTAM P.O., THRISSUR, PIN CODE - 680 602. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.BABU SMT.N.SUDHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENJIPALAM CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., PIN CODE - 673 635, KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY IT'S REGISTRAR. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, KOZHIKODE, PIN CODE - 673 635. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM SC SRI. P.C. SASIDHARAN GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.30715 OF 2010(L) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 8th Semester examination was declared, they got lesser marks in certain subjects and therefore they applied for revaluation by submitting Exts.P1 to P8 applications. They approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 6 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :