IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3441 of 2006 1. HARI MOHAN SINGH, SON OF LATE RAM BRIKSH SINGH, RESIDENT OF KUNJ GALI, BHADRAGHAT, P.S. ALAMGANJ, DISTRICT PATNA. 2. MAHMOOD ALAM, SON OF LATE ABDUL HAFEEZ, RESIDENT OF KAZMI BEGUM WOMEN’S COLLEGE CAMPUS, GUZRI, PATNA CITY, P.S. KHAJE KALAN, DISTRICT PATNA. 3. AKHTER HUSSAIN, SON OF LATE DABIRUL HUSSAIN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE HALAMALA, P.S. KISHANGANJ, DISTRICT KISHANGANJ. 4. SYED MOHAMMAD OMAIR AHMAD, SON OF LATE MAQBOOL JAN, R/O OLD KHAJOOR BANNA, NEAR DEVI ASTHAN, P.S. SULTANGANJ, DISTRICT PATNA. 5. MD. ISRAIL, S/JO LATE MD. IBRAHIM, R/O ALAMGANJ, PATHANTOLI, GULZARBAGH, P.S. ALAMGANJ, DISTT. PATNA. 6. SHREE ISLAM SHAKEB AYAR S/O LATE AZIMUDDIN, R/O NAWAB BAHADAN COLONY, N.B. ROAD, PATNA, P.S. KHAJEKALAN, PATNA CITY, DISTT. PATNA. 7. MOHAMMAD EHSANULLAH, S/O LATE SYED MOHAMMAD ISA, R/O BANWARITOLA, SADAR GALI, P.S. KHAJEKALAN, DISTRICT PATNA. 8. HAROON RASHID, S/JO LATE MD. IBRAHIM, R/O NORTH OF PROFESSORS COLONY, TRIPULIA, P.S. ALAMGANJ, DISTRICT PATNA. 9. SYED SAJID HUSSAIN S/O LATE SYED MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN R/O DARUL AMAN, JAMUN GALI, BHANWAR POKHAR, P.S. KADAMKUAN, DIST. PATNA. 10. SYED MOHAMMAD SAJID S/O LATE SYED MOHAMMAD AFZAL R/O SHAREEF COLONY, P.S. DISTT- PATNA. ... ... PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 3. THE JOINT SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 4. DIRECTOR, HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 5. MAGADH UNIVERSITY THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR, BODH GAYA. 6. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAGADH UNIVERSITY, BODH GAYA. 7. THE REGISTRAR, MAGADH UNIVERSITY, BODH GAYA. 8. THE FINANCE ADVISER, MAGADH UNIVERSITY, BODH GAYA. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 5. 30.3.2011. Learned Senior Counsel Shri T.N. Maitin, appearing on behalf of the petitioners, has prayed for withdrawal of 2 this writ application in view of the changed circumstances. Prayer is allowed. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that withdrawal of this writ petition may not prevent the petitioners in availing other remedy. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)