Y‘aw‘ MCC 1'94 . m 3 ‘mmlly Mathew. w/ Mr. Sajji Mathew aged 28 years.R/o. aamibadi. ch1r1m1:1.ia.s. cmmni. rahsu/ 13f 1 Manmaragarh.nisht. Korea. I ajji Mathew. s/o. Tmmas Machaw. /aged 33 years R/o. W.E.Z.62. Ist Floor. Block No.3 shimagar. New- nelhi pin/unass. present mamas” Tank Road.caro1 Bag. New nalh . ‘i‘ ; ‘W XI~HC~2 2 FULL BENCH : HON’BLE SEIRI LCBHADOO J. HO “BLE SHRI VK SHRIVASTA & HON’BLE SHRI DHIRENDRAI 16 01 2906 Smt. Hamida Siddiquiv, Jea‘rh The applican’t has preferfed (lndian) Divorce Act, 1869- for c granted in favour-of the applicant. In view of the amendment reference ,‘is reqaired and the 19 O7 2002 i e after the amendme of the Old Act reference was to be made by the District Court who passed the decree and no party was entltt d to move tre reference under Section t 17ofthe Act In View of the above maintainabie and the same is dlsm ssed M dISHRA J. ed counsel for the appiicant. ' this reference under Section 17 of the onfirmation 'of the decree of divorce in the (indian) Divorce Act 1869 no decree In question was passed on tof the Act Even under the Section 17 he aopiication of reference is rot i . i " V Sdl- Sd/- t Sd/- x L.C. BHA,I)OO V.K. Shrivastava Dhirendra Misha i I Judge /.r i Judge Judge ’ We éf’ee r