IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.1132 of 2005 (M/B) 1. Darshan Singh S/o Late Sher Singh 2. Makhan Singh S/o Late Sher Singh R/o Bhadaipura, P.S. Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar. …………. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Home Secretary, Uttaranchal Govt. Dehradun. 2. S.H.O., Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar. 3. Sri Bhuwan Chand Rekhari, Tax & Revenue Inspector, Nagar Palika Parishad, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar. ………. Respondents Mr. Dharam Veer Sharma, Senior Counsel for with Mr. Mohd. Zima, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. Dharam Veer Sharma, Senior Counsel for with Mr. Mohd. Zima, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. 2. Mr. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioners Darshan Singh and Makhan Singh seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them, now, has become infructuous, as the Police after the completion of the investigation, has filed charge sheet against the petitioners before the concerning court. 3. In this view of matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the interim order dated 07.10.2005 stands vacated automatically. 5. With the above order, dated, CLMA No.8466 of 2005 also stands disposed of. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 04.07.2006 04.07.2006 G