IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5629 of 2009 ASHA DEVI, wife of Bhairav chaudhary, daughter of Deo Narain Chaudhary, resident of village-Bariyarpur Chowk, P.S.-Station Sakra, District-Muzaffarpur --------------------------------------------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 3.3.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner has no concern with the seized ganja rather witnesses in course of investigation had said about her brother’s involvement in the business of ganja and in that connection only Lata had come. But even in absence of petitioner’s brother, Lata if came with ganja then only purpose was to sell the same. There was no adverse against posing that she has no concern or she was opposing its possession. Quantity of the seized ganja was more than small quantity and only in the name of a lady, no liberal view can be taken as Lata, for whom it is said that she brought the seized ganja, was also a lady. So it appears that only lady members are engaged in the business of sale and purchase of ganja. Further, I find no substance in the submission advanced on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was a married girl of a family and had come from her sasural and at that time her brother was in jail. Prayer for bail is rejected. However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )