THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRIMINAL PETITION No.7531 OF 2009 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking quashing of further proceedings against the petitioner-accused in Cr.No.111 of 2009 of Ibrahimpatnam police station. 2. Heard both sides. Perused the record. 3. 2nd respondent herein filed private complaint against the petitioner alleging offences under Sections 420, 468 and 471 IPC. The learned Magistrate forwarded the same to the police under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. for investigation and report and thereupon F.I.R.No.111 of 2009 was registered at the Ibrahimpatnam police station. The investigation is stated to be pending. 4. According to the complainant, the accused offered to sell a plot bearing No.164 admeasuring 200 sq.yards in Sy.No.32, Ganganagar colony, Bongulur villalge, Ibrahimpatnam mandal stating that she purchased the same from the original owner-Pattabhiramulu under a registered sale deed, dated 21.11.2007, and believing the version of the accused the complainant purchased the said plot under a registered sale deed, dated 22.12.2006. It is further alleged that in February, 2009, some unknown persons came to the said plot and tried to dig pits whereupon the complainant raised objection and produced her sale deed and also the link document and on verification it was found that the link sale deed, dated 21.11.2006, furnished by the accused was a bogus document and the photograph affixed thereon did not belong to the original owner-Pattabhiramulu. It is further alleged that the said Pattabhiramulu was impersonated by some third person and accused brought the sale deed, dated 21.11.2006, into existence by forgery and fabrication and subsequently sold the said plot to the complainant within one month on 22.12.2006 and thereby cheated the complainant. The question as to whether or not the document, dated 21.11.2006, in favour of the accused and purported to have been executed by Pattabhiramulu was genuine or it was bogus document brought into existence by the accused by forgery and fabrication, is a matter to be considered after due investigation. In view of the specific allegations made in the complaint, prima facie attracting the ingredients of the alleged offences, it is considered not a fit case to invoke the inherent powers of the Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and quash further proceedings so as to thwart the investigation into the complaint. As the matter requires thorough investigation, further proceedings in F.I.R.No.111 of 2009 of Ibrahimpatnam police station are held not liable to be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 5. In the result, Criminal Petition is dismissed. _______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 08th December, 2011. Tsy