THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 172 of 2008. Mahendra Singh … Petitioner. Vs. Union of India and another. …Respondents. Mr. Pankaj Negi, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. N.S. Negi, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. H.S.Rawal, learned Standing Counsel, Union of India, for the respondents. Date August 16, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Civil Misc. Application No. 6773 of 2010) Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this Miscellaneous Application (No. 6773 of 2010), the respondents have prayed that the writ petition be dismissed as infructuous on the ground that the petitioner was appointed as Sepoy General Duty on 2-7-2010. The respondents have also annexed the copy of appointment order as Annexure-1 to the affidavit, duly sworn in by Deputy Commandant, Group Centre CRPF, Kathgodam. Learned counsel for the petition has no objection if the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP