IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2330 of 2011 Ganga Devi Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 3. 30.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite parties. It is not in controversy between the parties that in fact no deductions were made from the pensionary dues of the petitioner in pursuance of the order dated 25.2.2008 cancelling the first and second time bound promotion granted in service and which was not approved of by the Court. To that extent there is no occasion to proceed in the contempt jurisdiction. Counsel for the petitioner next submits that the final pension payment order and the method by which it has been calculated whether it includes the benefits wrongly sought to be denied by the order dated 25.2.2008 have still not been submitted to the petitioner and she may be furnished details of calculations to enable her to represent if she has any further grievance. Counsel for the opposite parties relies upon the hand note of the petitioner dated 24.11.2011 that there were no outstanding dues. Considering that the petitioner was holding 2 the post of a Peon and today she is approximately 70 years of age, let the opposite party furnish details of the accounts to the petitioner so that if aggrieved she may pursue her remedy appropriately. Objection on behalf of the opposite parties that the Treasury Officer who shall make the calculation is not made a party is best answered by directing the Principal of the Training College to bring this order to the attention of the Treasury Officer who shall then be bound for compliance also. The proceeding stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)