wp2429.11.odt 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETN. NO.2429/2011 Smt.Shakuntala Babarao Yadao and others -vs- Vijaykumar Swarupchand Bardiya and others ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shri M.A.Vaishnav, learned counsel for the petitioners. None for the respondent Nos.1 & 2. Shri A.D.Sonak, learned AGP for the respondent No.3. CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATED : 01/08/2011. The above petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India takes exception to the order dated 31/07/2010 passed by the Additional Collector, Amravati, by which order the objection of the petitioners regarding maintainability of the application filed by the respondents herein purportedly for review, came to be rejected. As can be seen from the record, the said application has been styled as a Revision Application. The Additional Collector considering it to be a Revision Application has said that the same is not maintainable and, therefore, has rejected the said Revision Application. However, thereafter the Additional Collector by observing that under Clause 21 (2-A) of the C.P. & Berar, Letting of House and Rent Control Order, 1949, the applicants i.e. the respondents can file for review of the order, has rejected the objection of the petitioners herein to wp2429.11.odt 2/2 the maintainability of the review application. The order indicates that only the objection regarding the maintainability has been rejected, however, the matter is yet to be considered on merits. In that view of the matter, it is not necessary to interdict with the said proceedings at this stage, by leaving the challenge open as regards the maintainability of the Review Application for being raised at a later stage, if ultimately the final orders go against the petitioner, the above petition is disposed of. JUDGE KHUNTE