IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 14356 of 2008 Between: 1 V. Srinivasa Reddy S/o. Late V. Chenna Reddy R/o. 3/2RT, Municipal Colony, Malakpet, Hyderabad. 2 V.Laxma Reddy S/o. Late V. Chenna Reddy R/o. Tolumamidi Villae, Bantataram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 3 V. Venkateshwar Reddy S/o. Late V. Chenna Reddy R/o. 3/2RT, Municipal Colony, Malakpet, Hyderabad. 4 Smt. Vedula Swarnalatha W/o. Sundara Rao R/o. Chendolur Village, Port Darsi, Prakasam District. 5 Sri Katike Srishyalam S/o. Bakkaiah R/o. Khanpaur Village & Mandal, Under Revenue Mandal, Koheer ,Medak District. 6 Smt. Kulkarni Vanamala W/. S. Raghuram R/o. LIG 629, BHEL, Ramachandrapuram, Hyderabad-32 7 Sri Kulkarni Srinviasa S/o. S. Raghuram R/o. 2-5-143, Rachannapeta Street, Zaheerabad Town & Mandal, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Joint Sub Registrar-I R.O. (OB) Sanga Reddy Medak 2 District Registrar & Collector Sanga Reddy ,Medak District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the natrue of writ of Certiorari call for the records pertaining to the File No. G1/888/2007 dt. 1-11-2007 passed by the 2nd respondent herein by setting aside the same consequently direct the 1st Respondent to register the pending document No. P186/07 dt. 24-5-2007 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.VENKATADRI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.14356 OF 2008 ORAL ORDER: Aggrieved by the orders dated 01.11.2007 passed by the second respondent-District Registrar and Collector, Sanga Reddy, Medak District, in Case No.1 of 2007 whereunder the deficit stamp duty and registration fee was worked out against the petitioners, the present writ petition is filed. When the matter is taken up for admission today, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submits that as against the impugned orders passed by the second respondent, an effective alternative remedy of appeal under Section 47-A (5) of the Indian Stamp Act is available before the appellate authority concerned and without availing the said remedy the petitioners have directly approached this Court and filed the present writ petition. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners agreed to avail the remedy of appeal before the appellate authority concerned. In view of the agreed stand taken by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, without going into the merits of the matter, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition at the stage of admission with the following directions: The petitioners are directed to avail the alternative remedy of appeal available to them under Section 47-A (5) of the Indian Stamp Act before the appellate authority concerned as against the impugned orders dated 01.11.2008 passed by the second respondent-District Registrar and Collector, Sanga Reddy, Medak District, in Case No.1 of 2007, and on filing such appeal, the appellate authority shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law expeditiously. In the process of filing the appeal, if there is any delay occasioned, the same may also be considered on merits. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J. Date: 07.07.2008. VGSR