1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.938 OF 2009 WITH C.A.NO.1171 OF 2009 Vijay Nand Singh. ..Appellant. Vs. St.Francis Xavier Church and ors. ..Respondents. Mr.Anil R. Mishra for the Applicant. Mr. S.A.P. Thomas for the Respondents 1 and 2. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 16th Sept.2009. PC: 1 Heard both sides. 2 Matter can be disposed off finally. Hence, admit. Matter finally heard. 3 It is seen that the impugned order was passed at an ad interim stage without dealing with the plaintiff s case and the contentions of the parties. In my view, a proper reasoned order is desirable even at the ad-interim stage because a question of loss of possession is involved. In the circumstances, impugned order is set aside. Appeal 2 is allowed and the matter is remanded to the trial court for reconsideration of grant of ad interim relief to the plaintiff. It is directed that till the fresh reasoned order is passed, both the parties will maintain status quo as of today. 2 As the appeal is disposed off today, civil application does not survive and the same is also disposed off. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)