IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 18762 of 2007 Between: St.Mary College of Pharmacy,Surampalem, Peddapuram East Godavari rep.by its Secretary & Correspondent K.Raj Kumar ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee, For Regulation the Admissions in Private Un-Aided Professional Colleges, (formerly the Committee to Oversee Conduct of CETs by the Association of Private Un-aided Professional colleges and Allied Matters), 1st floor, (South Wing) Gagan Vihar, M.J.road, Nampally,Hyderabad, rep.by its Member 2 The AP State Council For Higher Education, rep.by its Secretary, Mahavir Marg, Masab Tank, Hyderabad 3 The Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, rep.by its Registrar 4 The Convenor-EAMCET-2007(Admissions) C/o.AP State Council of Higher Education, Mahavri Marg, Masab Tank Hyderabad 5 The Convenor, EAMCET-Ac (Admissions), C/o.SWII Window, 401, Srinivasa Apartments, 866, 6th street, Humayun Nagar Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.1 in rejecting the option of the petitioner to be governed by allotments to be made by the 5th respondent in SW II mode vide the impugned proceeding No.01/AFRC-RA/2007-626 dated 25.8.2007 and including the petitioner in SWI window vide proceedings dated 29.8.2007 for the pharmacy programme for the academic year 2007-08 as arbitrary, and illegal, and contrary to the statutory rules and issue a consequential direction to the respondent No.5 to allot students to the petitioner under SWI mode treating it to be a Christian Minority Educational Institution and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.SRI RAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri S. Sri Ram, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition no longer survives for adjudication. Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as ‘infructuous’. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 29-02-2008 Pvks/*