IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.28966 of 2011 1 Vinod Paswan, son of Jogi Paswan 2 Bikku Paswan, son of Maheshwar Paswan 3 Lakhindra Paswan, S/o – Maran Paswan All resident of village – Supaul Tariya, P.S. – Mahua, District – Vaishali. --------- Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar -------Opposite Party ****** 02. 21.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. All the three petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 282/2011 for the offences under Sections 323/324/341/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajupur. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with respect to petitioner no. 2 and 3 namely, Bikku Paswan and Lakhindra Paswan with a liberty to surrender before the court below within a fortnight and seek regular bail. Permission is granted. On such prayer, regular bail of petitioners no. 2 and 3 shall be considered by the court below on its own merit without being prejudice of instant withdrawal. Accordingly, this application stands disposed of as withdrawn with respect to petitioners no. 2 and 3 namely, Bikku Paswan and Lakhindra Paswan. So far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned, he carries general and omnibus allegation. Parties are at amicable terms in view of the earlier filed complaint case no. 1794/2011. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajupur, in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 282/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for one year or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)