THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM CRP NO.3782 OF 2009 05-12-2009 BETWEEN; Gudipalli Prakasa Rao ...Petitioner vs. Nukala Venkata Rajagopal ...Respondent THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM CRP NO.3782 of 2009 ORAL ORDER: This revision by the plaintiff is directed against the order dated 30-06-2009 of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole rejecting I.A.No.326 of 2009 in O.S.No.411 of 2007. The revision petitioner/plaintiff had filed the application under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act,1872 read with Sec.151 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 for sending the suit promissory note to an expert for determining the age of the ink in respect of the signatures of the defendant, of the attestors and the scribe on the suit promissory note. The court below by the order impugned, rejected the application. It is represented by Sri Nanduri Madhavarao, the learned counsel for the respondent that the substantive suit, O.S.No.411 of 2007, was allowed by the judgment and decree dated 10-09-2009 and hence this revision directed against the order of the Court below in I.A.No.326 of 2009 does not survive. The learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Bokka Satyanarayana, states that he is not aware of the fact that the court below had disposed of the main suit itself. A Xerox copy of the judgment and decree in O.S.No.411 of 2007 of the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole has been placed for the perusal of this Court by Sri Nanduri Madhavarao, the learned counsel for the respondent. In view of this development, as asserted by the counsel for the respondent, the substantive grievance in the revision does not subsist. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 5th DECEMBER 2009. TSNR