$-65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3791/2011 MOHAN BRAHAMAN & ANR. Petitioner Through: Mr. Mahipal Singh,Advocate. versus :4 STATE&ANR. Respondent Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State. Mr. S.K. Srivastava & Mr. C.D. Rai, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA ORDER y % 18.11.2011 ^ This is a petition for quashing of FIR No'.27/2008under Sections 498A/34 IPC registered at P.S. Jaffarpur Kalan. Petitioner No.l, Mohan Brahman and respondent No.2, Pooja Rathi are present in person with their counsel. Both the parties are identifiedby their counsel. The parties have arrived at an amicable settlement in the Mediation Cell, Dwarka District Courts. They have already been granted divorce by mutual consent. In terms of the settlement, Rs.80,000/-has already been paid by the petitionerNo.l, Mohan Brahman to respondent Signing Date:23.08.2024 17:09:51 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified $ No.2, Pooja. The balanceof Rs.30,000/-is paid in cash to the respondent No.2 in Court today. RespondentNo.2, Pooja now states that she has no claim or grievance against the petitioners. Further, the couple has a daughter.Baby Sapna aged 5 years. She has beenbroughtby Poojaand has been handedoverto herhusband,Mohan Brahman,petitionerNo.l herein. RespondentNo.2, Pooja, who is present, statesthat she has givenher daughterto thepetitionerNo.l, herhusbandon her own free will and in the interest of the child. In view of this, no useful purposewill be served in continuingFIR No.27/2008. Consequently,FIR ^ No.27/2008under Sections498A/34IPC registeredat P.S. JaffarpurKalan and allproceedingsemanatingtherefromare herebyquashed. The petition stands disposedof. M.L. MEHTA,J NOVEMBER 18,2011 skw