IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 7TH OCTOBER 2008 / 15TH ASWINA 1930 RP.No. 667 of 2008(T) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.21792/2007 Dated 08/01/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER: PETITIONER IN THE W.P. ------------------------------------------------------- SUBAIDA, NADUVAZHIKATH, THEKKETHIL, KUREEPUZHA, PERINAD, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI RESPONDENTS:RESPONDENTS IN THE W.P. ------------------------------------------------ 1.THE SECRETARY KOLLAM CORPORATION, KOLLAM. 2.THE SECRETARY KOLLAM DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KOLLAM CORPORATION, KOLLAM. 3.THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR) KOLLAM. R1-R2 BY ADV.MR.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, S.C. R3 BY SR.GOVT. PLEADER MR.BASANT BALAJI THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.No.667 of 2008 in W.P.(C) No.21792 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 7th October, 2008 ORDER It is submitted on behalf of Mr.Chandramohan Das that the Secretary of the Corporation does not have the power to grant concessions on interest or other counts to the petitioner. Under the above circumstances, I am of the view that it is for the petitioner to file a proper representation before the 1st respondent-Corporation so that the Council of the Corporation can deliberate on the same and take a decision. If the petitioner files such a representation before the 1st respondent voicing all her grievances and highlighting the pitiable circumstances in which she is presently placed, within ten days of receiving copy of this order, the needful shall be done by the first respondent to ensure that the Corporation Council takes a final decision on the representation within six weeks of the petitioner filing the same. The petitioner will also be afforded opportunity for oral hearing when the Council takes a decision on the representation. Considering the above direction, there will be a further direction that coercive action under the Revenue Recovery Act shall be kept in abeyance till such time as the Corporation Council takes a decision on R.P.No.667/08 - 2 - the representation. The Review Petition is disposed of as above. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE