IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH AUGUST 2009 / 4TH BHADRA 1931 LA.App..No. 1700 of 2008(D) --------------------------- LAR.184/2000 of ADDL.SUB COURT, NORTH PARAVUR .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT -------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANTS ------------------------ 1. IBRAHIMKUTTY, S/O.MAIMU, ALUNGAPARAMBU, MANJALI KARA. (DIED) 2. AMINA, W/O.IBRAHIMKUTTY, ALUNGAPARAMBU, MANJALI KARA REP.BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER RASHEEDA, D/O.IBRAHIMKUTTY, ALUNGAPARAMBU, MANJALI KARA. (DIED) * ADDL. R3 RASHEEDA, D/O LATE IBRAHIMKUTTY, AGED 33 YEARS, ALUNGAPARAMBU, MANJALI KARA, N. PARAVUR. *(R3 IS IMPLEADED AS LEGAL HEIR OF THE DECEASED RESPONDENTS VIDE ORDER DT.22/07/09 IN I.A.1931/09) ADV. SRI.MANZOOR ALI.K.A. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ L. A. A. No.1700 of 2008 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 26th day of August, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J The Registry reports to us that against the judgment in L.A.R.88/2000 of Additional Sub Court, North Paravur, the Government did not prefer any appeal and thus, that judgment has attained finality. It is apparent that L.A.R.88/2000 also pertains to the same acquisition and the Land Acquisition Officer had granted the same value to the claimant in that case. In view of the finality attained by judgment in L.A.R.88/2000 we do not find justification for entertaining this appeal. It is noticed that in L.A.R.88/2000 also, the same rate of enhancement L. A. A. No.1700 of 2008 -2- was granted by the Reference Court. This appeal, accordingly, will stand dismissed. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE K. SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE kns/-