1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.09.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.JYOTHIMANI AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.P.(MD).No.10379 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 S.Palpandian : Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai. 2.The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.The Assistant Commissioner (Excise), Madurai District Collector Office, Madurai. : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from opening Wine Shop with bar to the proposed building at T.S.No.103, Town Survey No.1, Block 2, Theppakkulam, Madurai. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Kannan For Respondents : Mr.K.Mahendran Special Government Pleader O R D E R ********** [Order of the Court was made BY P.JYOTHIMANI, J] Mr.K.Mahendran, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. In the earlier order passed by this Court dated 18.08.2011, we have directed the District Collector - the first respondent herein to consider the representation of the petitioner therein before effecting shifting of Wine Shop No.5220 at T.S.No.103, Town Survey No.1, Block 2, Theppakkulam, Madurai. 3. The complaint of the petitioner is that it is in order to get over the said direction, a proposal is being made for the purpose of shifting the Wine Shop with a different number. 4. Today, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that even if it is in respect of different wine https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 shop with different number, the District Collector will consider the representation of the petitioner before taking any steps for shifting Wine Shop. 5. Recording the said submission made by the learned Special Government Pleader, the Writ Petition stands closed, reiterating the earlier order of this Court dated 18.08.2011. Making it further clear that whether it is in respect of Wine Shop No.5220 or any other shop, the first respondent shall consider the representation of the petitioner dated 09.09.2011 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law before taking any final decision. It is needless to say that till such orders are passed by the first respondent, status-quo as-on- today shall be maintained. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. sd/- Assistant Registrar (RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar (C.S) To 1. The District Collector, Madurai. 2. The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limite., Madurai District, Madurai. 3. The Assistant Commissioner (Excise), Madurai District Collector Office, Madurai. + 1 cc to Mr.M.Kannan, Advocate, SR No.31473 + 1 cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR No.31551 ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD).No.10379 of 2011 14.09.2011 NB RJ/26.9.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/