IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6729 of 2010 KAPIL DEO PRASAD YADAV son OF LATE CHATHU PRASAD YADAV, RESIDENT OF KUMHARAR NAYA TOLA NEAR TALAB, P.S. AGAMKUAN, DISTRICT PATNA Versus 1. PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH ITS MAYOR, BUDH MARG PATNA. 2. MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER CUM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BUDH MARG, PATNA. 3. CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BUDH MARG, PATNA. 4. EXECUTIVE OFFICER NUTUN RAJDHANI ANCHAL, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION 10 HARDING ROAD, PATNA. ----------- For the Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Pandey Advocate. For the Respondent :- Dr. Poonam Kumari Singh Advocate. 02. 20.04.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the respondent – Corporation. The grievance of the petitioner is that petitioner upon his superannuation on 01.01.2000 as Tax Collector from Nutun Rajdhani Anchal, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna, entire retiral dues of the petitioner have not been paid and settled. The petitioner is entitled to retiral dues in the revised scale. It is further submitted that pension has not been paid till date. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Corporation submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a 2 representation before the respondent no.2. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. However, upon consideration, if any of the claims or part of the claims are not found payable, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)