IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.613 of 2010 1. LALAN PRASAD, S/o Saryug Prasad, R/o Moh. Kalibagh, P.S. Bettiah Town, District-West Champaran. 2. Binod Prasad, S/o Sri Kari Prasad, R/o Vill. Balua Rampurwa, P.S. Bairia, Dist. West Champaran Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 29.04.2010 Heard both the parties. This revision application is filed against the Judgment and order dated 20.03.2010 passed in Sessions Trial No. 16 of 1997 by the Additional Sessions Judge-III, West Champaran at Bettiah. Petitioners are convicted under Section 344 of the Cr. P.C. for giving false statement. The option given during trial of the offence to the Trial Court is opted, show cause issued and petitioners convicted and sentenced. Legality, correctness and propriety have been questioned through filing this revision petition. The only point raised on behalf of the petitioners is that procedure for summary trial is not observed. On that score, the order is illegal but petitioners opt to press the sentence only, if liberal views be taken. Further submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners surrendered in the Court on 22.04.2010 and since then he is in custody. If that is observed sufficient towards sentence, that will also solve the purpose to meet the ends of justice. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, the revision application is partly allowed on the point of sentence which is modified and minimized to the 2 period undergone and the above named petitioners are directed to be released forthwith, if not wanted in any other case. The Judgment and order dated 20.03.2010 passed in Sessions Trial No. 16 of 1997 by the Additional Sessions Judge-III, West Champaran at Bettiah is hereby affirmed. Let the order be communicated to the trial court through F.A.X. at the cost of the petitioners. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)