IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4083 of 2007 Date of Decision : April 21, 2010. Maghar Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Jagdev Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Charu Tuli, Senior DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner was appointed as a P.R.Chowkidar in the year 1980 and he has retired w.e.f. 30.9.2006 on attaining the age of superannuation. He seeks a mandamus to direct the respondents to release his retiral benefits alongwith interest. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the claim of the petitioner stands answered in his favour by a decision of this Court dated 17.11.2008 rendered in Civil Writ Petition No.10524 of 2007 (Dangal Singh versus State of Punjab and others). The present writ petition is allowed in terms of the order dated C.W.P.No .4083 of 2007 2 17.11.2008 passed in Dangal Singh's case (supra). The respondents are directed to release the consequential retiral benefits to the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Dasti. April 21, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE