THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11476 of 2010 ORDER: The writ petition has been filed by A.Mohan Reddy assailing the tender notice issued vide ROC No.Rev2/1394/AEO(Rev)/TPT/08 published in Eenadu Telugu Daily Newspaper, dated 04.05.2010. The petitioner is a licensee for maintenance of parking area and for collection of parking fees for two wheelers and four wheelers at Srinivasam Complex, Tirupathi. His licence period commenced from 02.05.2008, initially, for one year and subsequently, the licence came to be extended for one more year under proceedings No.Rev-2/1394/AEO(Rev)/TPT/08, dated 22.05.2009. His licence period expires by 22.05.2010. The respondents issued notification calling for tenders for the year 2010-2011, for a period of one year. Hence, this writ petition. Heard Sri J.Ugra Narasimha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt. K.N. Vijayalakshmi, learned counsel representing Sri Y.V.Ravi Prasad, learned Special Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in the notification issued on 02.05.2008, it is indicated that the licence is extendible for a maximum period of three years and therefore, the petitioner is entitled to be continued as a licensee till the completion of three years. Whereas, it is contended by the learned Special Standing Counsel for the respondents that the licence period has been expired and the same has been communicated to the petitioner under proceedings, dated 19.03.2010 and the petitioner has not been challenged the said proceedings, in which case, it is impermissible for him to challenge the tender notice vide ROC No.Rev2/1394/AEO(Rev)/TPT/08 published in Eenadu Telugu Daily Newspaper, dated 04.05.2010. I have gone through the proceedings, dated 19.03.2010. The relevant portion of the proceedings reads as under: “As per reference cited 1, A.Mohan Reddy was conferred licence for one year. As per reference 2 cited, from 22.05.2009 to 22.05.2010 the period of license was extended. As per reference 3 cited, the licensee has requested for extension from 22.05.2010 to 22.05.2011. (third year will be completed). The above subject was taken to the notice of the TTD authorities and in turn the said matter was considered and parking at Srinivasam, Tirupathi should be granted vide new tender and hence, his request is rejected. Hence, it is directed that A.Mohan Reddy, the licensee, subsequent to the determination of the license period on 22.05.2010 should deliver vacant possession.” It is evident from the above referred proceedings, that the license period of the petitioner expires by 22.05.2010. The petitioner made an application for extension of license period by one more year. His application came to be rejected. Once the application filed by the petitioner seeking extension is rejected, he cannot be permitted to challenge the tender notice, dated 04.05.2010. Accordingly, the writ petition is devoid of merits and the same is dismissed at the stage of admission. No costs. _________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY,J Dt:19.05.2010. pnb/kdl