IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.65 OF 2003 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6435 OF 2001 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:------------------------------------ Mr.S.K.Chinchalikar AGP for the petitioner. None for the respondent. CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR,AG.C.J. & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR,AG.C.J. & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR,AG.C.J. & D.B.BHOSALE, J. D.B.BHOSALE, J. D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 19TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 19TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 19TH DECEMBER, 2005 P.C.: . This revision petition is filed basically on two grounds, one judgment of this Court passed on 6th March, 1990 was not considered and second the resolutions mentioned in the order under review were not applicable. 2. The order which is not considered and, therefore, it is pleaded as error apparent on face of record which was passed on 6th March, 1990. This Court has while deciding earlier writ petition placed reliance on Government Resolution dated 26th July, 1990 which obviously was passed after order dated 6th March, 1990. It cannot be, therefore, said that the judgment was not considered and this, therefore, constituted an error apparent on the face of record. The applicability of the resolution was factually considered and decided that would be error of law which can be assailed in appropriate forum. We see no reason to interfere in this matter. The review petition is dismissed accordingly. ...