IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.4955 of 2005 Between: Shaik Rahamthulla and 12 others ..... PETITIONER AND The District Collector, Ongole, Prakasam District and 3 others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.4955 of 2005 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed to declare the action of the respondents in trying to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners in respect of the land in question. Respondents Nos.2, 3 and 4 filed counter stating that the adjacent land of the petitioners were allotted for construction of the police station by the Joint Collector vide his proceedings in Rc.No.E1-S9-2005, dated 17.01.2005 in respect of Sy.Nos.162/B/1B1, 162/B/1B2. It is stated that the adjacent land of the petitioners was only allotted for construction of the police station. The respondent did not interfere with the lands of the petitioners in question. The 1st respondent-District Collector filed a counter stating that the house site pattas granted in favour of the petitioners were cancelled and recorded the same as Government land. The said land was also disposed of in open auction. In fact, the petitioners and others earlier filed W.P.13757/1998 and subsequently the same was dismissed as withdrawn by order dated 06.06.2007. The possession of the said land was already taken and the same was proposed to be alienated in favour of A.P.State Civil Supplies Godown, police station and police quarters. It is stated that as the petitioners are not eligible for assignment, the assignments pattas were cancelled. It is further stated that similar petition filed by the petitioners was already dismissed as withdrawn so as enable the petitioners to file an appropriate appeal against the orders of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Markapur date 03.06.1996, cancelling the pattas of the petitioners. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of the writ petition is squarely covered by the orders passed in W.P.11144/1996 dated 05.04.2006. Following the terms of the aforesaid judgment, the Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 24.02.2011 Dsr