..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2444 OF 2008 Keshav Maruti Patil. ..Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. ... Mr.R.D.Suryawanshi,Adv. for the applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for the State. ... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 22nd July, 2008. DATED : 22nd July, 2008. DATED : 22nd July, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.I-56 of 2008 of Kalyan taluka police station. The said case is mainly under Section 307 of IPC. 3. The applicant has been named in the FIR. In the FIR the complainant has stated that the applicant along with other persons took part in the assault. Four persons were injured in the incident i.e. Ramdas Patil, Kanha Patil, Ananta ..(2).. Patil and Sunil Patil.. Witness Ganesh has stated that the applicant was holding a stick at that time. Kanha Patil has sustained four injuries two of which were serious in nature. Ramdas Patil has sustained injury on the left side of his chest and lower back. Sunil Patil has sustained two injuries and Ananta Patil has sustained two fractures on head. 4. Looking to the above facts, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. Application for anticipatory bail is rejected. 5. On request of the learned Counsel for the applicant, time to surrender is granted upto 25th July, 2008. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)