IIIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR S.B^:^ HON'BLE SHRI SATISHK.AGNIHOTRLJ, WEJT PETITION;<S) •No.2195 of 1, Ashok.-Kumar: :Sahu^ S/o Shri Bhukhan'LalSahu Age aboyt 4S years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Cliorbhatthy, Block - Arang, Distt.-Raipur(C.G.) 2. Dhalendra Kumar Sonkar S/o Shri SUital Prasad Sonkar Age about 44 years, Asstt, Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Hardidih, Block - Arang, )istt.-Raipur(C.G.) 3. Dew Singh Banjare S/o Shri'Pram Lal Banjare, Age about 45 years, Asstt, Teacher, Ooyt. Primary Sshbdl, Gylloo, Btock-Arang, Distt. .Raipur-(C.G.) : , 4. Smt. Dhan Bai Gilhare WTo Shri Jawahar Lal Gilhare Age about 50 years, Asstt. Teacher, R/'Q. - Village fe Post - Mandir Hasoud, BlocK - Arang, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) 5. Smt. Pramwati .Singh W/o Shri Narendra Singh Age about 45 years, Asstt.' Teacher, Govt. Primary Giils School, Mandir HasQud, Block - Arang, Distt. - Rapur (C.G.) , 6. PrahaJlad R&y S/o Shri Banshidhar Ray Age aboiit 50 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Godhi, ; Block - Arang, Distf. Raipur(C.G.) ,,^. 7. Uttam Das Jogi S/o Shri Dukalaha' Ram Jogi Age abouf 39 years, Asstt. Teacher, R/o. - Village & Post -: Mandir Hasoud, Block -< Arang; .Distt.- Raipur^.G.) . .. . : . j8. 'Narsmgli; Das,.Mamkpuri;S/e ^ Stiri, Gaaesfi Das Mamkpuri Age.abowt.'^I years,^Asstt. Teachei^<3ovt. Primary^ .School; Miinrethi, Bldck - Arans -K^'^ft~"^c ~^EEik i.3i 3-e RESPONDENTS Distt.-Raipur(C,©.) 9. Hriday Lal Jangdhay S/'o Shri Mulchand Jangdhay Age about 52 years, Asstt. Teacher, Qovt; Primary School, Khuteri, Block — Arang, Distt.-Raipur(C.G.) tO.Smt Amar Bai Ratre W/Q Shri Jeewan Lal Ratre Age about 45 years, Asstt. Teaoher, Govt. Primary School, Bhansoj, Block-Arang, Distt. -Raipur(C.G.) 11,Laxman Ram Verma S/o Shri Uday Ram Verma Age about 40 years, Asstt. Techer, Govt. Primary School, Kurud, Block-Arang, Distt.-RaipBr •(C,G.) :. • :,: ::. 12.Neharu Kumar Chandrakar S/o Late Shri Onkar Prasad Ghandrakar Age about 47years,Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Boys Primary School, Mandir Hasoyd, Block-Arang, Distt. — Rflipur(C.G.) •VERSUS'.. .•1' - : ' ' 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through: Seeretary, School Educatioa Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer Raipur .(C.G.) . ':'..;, ' • Present: Sliri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri VinayPandey, Panel Lawyer for the State /' respondeBts. ORDER tffi (Passed on 10m ofApril, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondente jointly submit that the fact and questionoflawmvolvedinfhepresentwritpetitiQnarethe same to that of ia Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mumcipal C'orporatipn, Durg and another {2006 ^^)'M i3°i": Ss' 1 :ij MPJR-CG 96}, whicli lias been disposed of vide order dated 03.045QQ6. Leamed counsel appearing ixir the respondentsdoesnotcontrovertthesaidsubmission, 2. In subsequentcases, i.e.,'W^ritPetition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kwnar Verma vs. The State Gort. of Chhatfwgwh and another) said other connected matters, decided by this Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memodated 28-1-1995, issuedby the Secretaiy, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination, it was clarified that the nomenclature ofthe Basic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has beea changed and renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordiagly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Wnt Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2Q05 (Gopesh Kumar Verma ys. The State Govt. 6f Chhattisgarhand anothery(SupT&). 3. Accordmgly, thewrit petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporafton, Durg and anofher (Supra), subJect to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired D.Ed./B.Ed Examination Certificate on their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and furfeer whether they have been paid two adyance increments or not. No order as tp costs. I~ I i Sd/- . SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Amlt