IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 13855 of 2009 Date of Decision: 5.9.2009 Rajesh Kumar and another --Petitioners Versus The Financial Commissioner and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. R.S. Panghal, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion to respondents no. 1 and 2 only. Mr. R.S. Kundu, Addl. A.G., Haryana has been asked to accept notice on behalf of the respondents. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking a direction to take action against respondent no.3, Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Ranila, District Bhiwani on the basis of the inquiry conducted against him. The petitioner has made a representation (Annexure P-5) and also served a legal notice (Annexure P-6). The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the completion of the regular inquiry, no action is being initiated against respondent no.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will be satisfied, if the respondents are directed to take decision on the representation/legal notice, referred to above. In view of the above circumstances, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take decision on the representation/legal notice, served by the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. It is, however, made clear that all rules and principles of natural justice will be complied with. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 24.8.2009 lucky