IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41781 of 2010 NISHA KUMARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU.VIGILANCE ----------- 2/ 14.1.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The principles of quashing the FIR are well known. If the facts do not constitute an offence, if any offence is constituted, the same is time barred or there is some legal infirmity in the very institution of the FIR and, above all, if the allegations stem from the intent of heaping vengeance and spitting at the accused. These are not available in the present case which relates to fabricating public records of land acquisition and payment of compensation money. It is true that the petitioner, who is an advocate of a short practice, as was submitted, was merely identifying the recipient of the cheque which was carrying the value of compensation to be paid. If facts disclose commission of any cognizable offence, then no investigation could be scuttled out by quashing the proceeding. This is the legal position. The present facts do constitute offences under which the present FIR has been registered. The petition has no merit. It is dismissed. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)