IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15140 of 2010 RAJESHWAR PRASAD YADAV, son of Late Turanti Yadav, resident of at present Girja Bhawan, Batraha, Ward No.25 Saharsa, P.O. + P.S. and District-Saharsa, a Retd. Revenue Karamchari from Anchal-Kahara, District-Saharsa. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Land Reforms and Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Commissioner, Kosi Division, Saharsa. 3. The Collector, Saharsa, P.O. + P.S. and District Saharsa. 4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Saharsa, P.O. + P.S. and District Saharsa. 5. The Director, District Rural Development Authority, Saharsa, P.O.+P.S. and District- Saharsa. 6. The Block Development Officer, Kahara, Saharsa, P.S. and District-Saharsa. 7. The Circle Officer, Kahara, Saharsa, P.S. and District-Saharsa. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 13.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation as a Revenue Karmachari under Kahara Circle within the District of Saharsa on 30th of June, 2008, the pensionary benefits have not been settled and paid till date despite representations as contained in Annexure 3 series. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State submits that the averments made in the writ application as also its Annexures are not clear with regard to the claims of the petitioner. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending - 2 - claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Collector, Saharsa (respondent no.3), with a copy each to respondents no.2, 6 and 7. In case such a representation is filed stating the details of his unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner with regard to the payment of retrial dues could be settled at the earliest. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)