IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 22029 of 2006 Between: M.Sattaiah S/o.Lingaiah R/o.Korvichelma village,Dandepally Mandal Adilabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Collector (Panchahat Wing) Adilabad District, Adilabad. 2 District Panchayat Officer, Adilabad District, Adilabad. 3 Divisional Panchayat Officer, Nirmal, Adilabad District. 4 Korvichelma Gram Panchayat, rep. by its Panchayat Secretary, Korvichelma, Dandepally Mandal, Adilabad District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the Notice dt. 20.10.2006 issued by the 4th respondent as being illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 19(i) (g) of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and suspend the said notice and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. N.V.RAMANA,J Dt.12.6.2009 msv