IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 932 of 2009 (Stay Application No.5142/2009) Mahendra Singh S/o Atar Singh, R/o Village - Gordhanpur, Pargana- Gordhanpur, Tehsil - Laksar, District - Haridwar. ……. Petitioner Versus Harbhajan Singh S/o Shri Anokha Singh, R/o Village-Jalman, Tehsil and District- Karnal, At present R/o Village - Rajpur, Pargana – Gordhanpur, District - Haridwar. …….. Respondent …………………………. Sri Lokpal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Date: June 25, 2009. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Haridwar to decide the Execution Case No.28 of 2002, Mahendra Singh Versus Harbhajan Singh expeditiously within the stipulated period fixed by this Court. 2. It is alleged by the petitioner that he had filed a suit for specific performance against the respondent in the year 1994 which was decreed by the trial court on 22.1.2000. The appeal filed by the respondent was also dismissed by the appellate court/Additional District Judge, Haridwar on 24.08.2002. The petitioner filed execution application on 19.09.2002, which was registered as Execution Application No.28/2002. It is also alleged by the petitioner that second appeal (bearing No. 100/2002) filed by the respondent was also dismissed by this Court on 20.03.2007 and Special Leave to appeal preferred against the said order has also been dismissed. It has also been 2 alleged that there is no stay order against the said execution proceedings from any Court. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that frequent adjournments are being sought by the respondent and the execution proceedings are being prolonged without any cogent reason due to which the petitioner is suffering great hardship. 4. The prayer is innocuous, deserves to be accepted. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Haridwar is directed to avoid unnecessary adjournments in Execution Case No.28 of 2002, Mahendra Singh versus Harbhajan Singh and decide the same expeditiously, if there is no stay in the case by the appellate court, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (Stay Application No.5142/2009 also stands disposed of.) (B.S.Verma, J.) 25.06.2009 P.Singh