C.M.No.22002-CII-2009 in/and C.R.No.1795 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M.No.22002-CII-2009 in/and C.R.No.1795 of 2008 Decided on: September 23, 2009. Resham Kaur .. Petitioner VERSUS Gurnek Singh etc. .. Respondents * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI PRESENT Mr.Satinder Khanna, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Anil Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.2. M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Misc. Application for impleadment of LRs of respondent No.2, Sital Singh, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Vide impugned order, the application filed under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, by respondent No.2, in a suit for maintenance filed by the petitioner-plaintiff against her husband-respondent No.1, has been allowed by the trial Court, on the ground that though no . . . 1 C.M.No.22002-CII-2009 in/and C.R.No.1795 of 2008 relief has been claimed by the petitioner-plaintiff against the added respondent but the relief claimed by the petitioner-plaintiff ultimately would affect the rights of the petitioner in view of the nature of the objections being raised by her husband-respondent No.1 and respondent No.2, who has been added as a defendant exercising the powers under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. After hearing counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that no interference is warranted in the impugned order. The impleadment of Sital Singh as additional defendant will ultimately secure the rights of the petitioner-plaintiff in case her suit is ultimately decreed. Dismissed. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE September 23, 2009. rka . . . 2