IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2692 of 2010 1. Arjun Mistry @ Arjun Sharma, son of Late Bindeshwari Mistry. 2. Pramod Sharma @ Bazir Mistry @ Bazir Sharma, son of Arjun Mistry, both are resident of Village- Rata, Police Station- Halsi, District- Lakhisarai. ……….Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar ………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 3. 31. 03. 2010. A supplementary affidavit has been filed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. Let it be kept on record. Heard Mr. Amrendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. B. B. Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 458 C/09, in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 147, 148, 323, 452, 380 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that as a matter of fact Petitioner No. 2 had earlier filed a criminal case on 08. 08. 2009 for offence under Section 307 and some other allied Sections of Indian Penal Code, vide Annexure-2. In that case present complainant Subodh Mahto and his other family members were arrayed in the category of accused. In retaliation of the aforesaid criminal case, the present complaint case has been filed on 10. 08. 2009, vide Annexure-1. By referring to Annexure-4 series, he has also submitted that petitioners and his other family members 2 had sustained injuries on their person. So far complainant, his mother, Shoba Devi or Birendra Mahto are concerned, their injury reports were not produced in the court. Learned counsel for the State has not disputed the aforesaid position. Be that as it may, in the aforesaid background, the petitioners, namely, Arjun Mistry @ Arjun Sharma and Pramod Sharma @ Bazir Mistry @ Bazir Sharma, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today, shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai, in connection with Complaint Case No. 458 C/09, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. m.p. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)