s s',6. rt<^- tie?W IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.1 WRIT PETITION fSt N0. 445 OF 2010 AMEN DEDCAUSE TITLE PETITIONER ^^}^. ^^"^'-..l0, "•-^5^KQ... ""^"" .......^"*'sate i: [^(^^_^^.w ^ RESPONDENTS : SheshKumar Sahu, aged about 34 years Son of Shri LalSai Sahu, Occupation Service Accountant cum Clerk, Aanganbadi Training Centre Dharamjaigarh, Nagar Panchayat Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS 1. Stateof Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Woman & Child Development, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Union of India, through the Ministry of Woman & Child Development, New Delhi. 3. The Director/Commissioner, Deptt of Woman and Child Development, State of Chhattisgarh, Near Old Nurses Hostel, Mantralaya Parishar, District Raipur (C.G.). 4. General Secretary (Maha-Sachiv) Chhattisgarh State Council for Child Welfare, Baal Bhawan, Sapre Shala Parisar, Near Scout Guide Office, Budhapara, Raipur (C.G.). ^ ^ 5. District Programme Officer, Department of Woman & Child Development, District Raigarh (CG) /-'" 6. Principal, Aanganbadi Training Centre - Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) f 7. Taruh Kumar Sharma, aged 38 years, S/o - not known to the petitioner, Working as - Accountant Cum Clerk, Aangan Badi Training Centre - Jashpur Distt. Jashpur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^ .A/'^- G/^'" 'aie ChhsttisgaEft Sta'fce Qaanetl Qsc ttie •£3*iXd Weltare KaJ EB»'awan» BaApur (e,<3.). 8«>$ar "W,ee e»»iA4e«t» ttte State of ghhaStitigarit. OauBeAl &>r tee CSilld Welfare, S.K.S, aaawaa* SaApur <<&S.). //<T^ ~ "^ \ S l S.B^esn^ I-N. l"^'/ s^-.,A X?n^ ^ \\ i^?'v. — / ; \<yx ^' ^-•^^i^M^^W^J-a 'iz»— ff ir HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Wri.t Petition (S) No. 445 of 2010 Petitioner Shesh Kumar Satiu Versus Respondents State of Chliatdsgarh & others (Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hou'bte Shri Satish K; Agnihotri J.) Shn A. N. Bliakta, Advocate for fhe petitkiner. Shri P. K. Bhaduri, Pauel Lawyer for the State/respondents No, 1, 3, 5 & 6. Ms Fouzia Mirza, Assistaat SoUcitor General for the respondent ^-,2. Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advocate for fhe respondent No4/ Caveator. ORDBRtorall ( Passed'bn fhis 15th day ofMarch, 2010) Heard. Learued counsel appearing for the petitioner, on iastrucUons, subinits fhat fhe petitioner seeks pennission of this Coitrt to withdraw the writ petition with Uberty to make a representation before the appropriate authority. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe respondeuts have no objection. In view ofthe above, the writ petition is disiatesed as withdrawn wifh the above stated Uberty. No order asto costs. Sd/- SATISH K. AGNMOTRI Judge •IlialmT