{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.168 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra APPLICANT VERSUS Bhimrao Dattarao Ghuge & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.N.R.Shaikh, APP for applicant State Mr.J.M.Murkute, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3 (Absent) ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 16th February 2010 PER COURT: 1. Heard learned APP. By this revision application, the State has challenged the order dated 22.04.2009 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani in Criminal M.A. No. 213/2009 whereby bail is granted to only present respondents No.1 and 2, who are aged persons of 75 years and 65 years respectively in connection with CR No.58/2009. 2. The order is challenged on the grounds in paragraph No.3 (i) to (viii). Perused the dying declaration, which is annexed along with the application, which according to prosecution, is not {2} considered by the learned lower court while granting the bail. 3. It is disclosed in the dying declaration by Lata Ghuge, recorded on 14.04.2009, that she has poured kerosene on her person and attempted to commit suicide, and later on she succumbed to the said burn injuries. Though the dying declaration on which emphasis is laid by the prosecution for cancellation of bail, is accepted at it is, allegations against the respondents are vague in nature and does not constitute any offence as alleged. In the premise, the order impugned in this revision application does not require any interference by this Court. In the result, the revision application, which is sans merits, stands dismissed in liminie. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/crirev168-09