M1: (2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BELASPUR PETITIONERS A.N.V. Satyanarayan S/o Shri A. Appala Swamy Age about 37 years, Lecturer C/o Shri AR. Verma, Behind Bunkar Sangh, Samara Badi, Durg, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) Ku. AshaTekam D/o Shri Kishan Tekam Age about 41 years, Upper Div. Teacher QNo. 1E, Sireet No. 27, Sector — 5, Bhilai (C.G.) Sarveshwar Dayai Mishra S/o Late Shri BD. Mishra Aged about -.47 years, Head Master, (initial Appointment - Asstt. Teacher), Govt. MS. Shankar Nagar, Durg, Distt. A Durg (C.G.) Smt. Padmavati Smita Rao (Before Marriage — Ku. Muddu Padmavati) W/o $hri Rajesh Kumar Rao Age about 86 years, Upper Div.Teacher ‘C-72, Priyadarshini Nagar, Risaii, Near, Mahakateshwar Mandir, KrishnaTaikies Road, Bhiiai, C.G. Mahendra Kumar Baghei S/o Shri Chunni Lat Baghei Age about 36 years, AssistantTeaoher, Govt. Middie Schooi, Badgaon, Charbhata, Biock — Dongargaon, Distt. - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETmON (S) No.é‘?7 12007 /'1 . 6. Praveen Kumar Sharma S/o Shri R, S. Sharma Age about 43 years, Ass-istaVntTeacher, I.R.Y. Govt. M.H.S. School, Bhatapara, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) ‘ 13 VERSUS 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through :.Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, i i D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.Gi) '1 " 2. Director of Pubiic instruction Raipurv(C.G.) District Education Officer > Distt. ~ Durg (C.G.) i 1 V. 4. District Education Officer Distt. - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3. District Education Qfficer Distt. - 'Fiaipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS ' , (V WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE m CONSTITUTION OI: INDIA @ 3. For The aforemenTioned reasons; The wriT peTiTion is disposed of in Terms of The decision of This CourT in The maTTer of yashwanf' Kumar HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH t HON'BLE MR: SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. WRIT PETITION (5.) No. 697 OF 2007 Pe‘l'i‘rioners : A.N.V. Sa'fyanamyan undVoThers versus Respondem’s : ‘S‘ra're of Chha‘l'fisgarh and o+hers Present : Mr. Ajay Shrivasmva, gounsel for 'rhe peti‘rioners. Mr. Sushii Governmenf Advoca‘re for- the Sm'fe/ Dubey, respondems. O R D E R (Passed on f'nis 7”‘ Day of February, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for The pe‘ri'rioners as we” as for The STa‘re/respondems joinfly submh' Thaw” The facTs and quesTion of law I invoived in The presenT wriT peTiTion are squarely covered by The decision of This Cour-T in The case of Yashwanf Kamar 5fharadwqi vs. Municipal Duty and anafher‘ ’ h (amorafian, . 2. Learned counsel appearing for The peTiTioner has poinTed ouT The / circular aaTed 13.9.1974 (Annexure P/1), whereunder according To The peTiTioner, The peTiTioners, who had obTai'ned. B.Ed. ExaminaTion CerTificaTes before appoinTmenT, are also enTiTled To Two advance incremenTs. The respondenTs/STaTe, while considering The cases of The peTiTioners, shall granT The relief, in accordance wiTh The circular (Supra). Bharadwaj (Supra), subject 1'0 verification of The fac1' as To whe‘i'her The pefi'i'ioner has acquired B.Ed. Cer'rifica'fe ai' his own expenses as per fhe circulars da‘i‘ed 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and furfher- whe‘rher he has been paid Two advance incremenfs or not No order as-1'o cos'rs. i Sd/- i i Satlsh - K- Agmho ‘ tri ; i i Judge 1 2006 (II) MPJR-ce 96 Subhash ‘