IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHArTISGARH^T BILASPUR WRITPETITIONNO./<5^(> /2006 T PETITIONER:- ,/^ AJit Pratap Singh S/o- Late Amresh Pratap Singh Aged about A3 /?./.••"'V-'" ...••* years, Caste- Chhatriya R/o- ^**'»A-""1"t.-"""" ^.ti.W^""'""/..-^' Village - Lakhanpur Post- i'-<..Vfl .l--' ^"^^ s? Lakhanpur Tahsil - Ambikapur Distt- Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS / 1) Manager M.P. State Cooperative Land Development Bank Ambikaapur Distt- Surguja (C.G.) ,-n .^ "^^ 2) Collector, Ambikapur Distt- Surguja (C.G) ^3) Tahsildar, Lakhanpur Tahsil- Ambikapur Distt- Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. XI-HC-22 an^r^r R-fi+3n^?r Stili<:bfl1?cl' tiiwii axiicn 3ST "l||<<|c|i|, OTfi^'IS, Rl<-)l<Hy 3TT^?T *4a<ft —"..f..^.c':..i.^7.Ll-Qf """•"•"••"''•""•^" 200^ Iclfc^ an^T?^ITWHf?tT Smt. Hamida Siddique, cou!|t Shri Neeraj Choubey, coun; Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Go|vt. respondents no.2 and 3. Heard. By way of this writ petition fi Constitution of India, the petition^r respondent no.1 to give the detail^ by the petitioner towards Bank li|! No.7/2004-05 was pending bef4 Operative Socteties, Sarguja, Ambj It is submitted by tearned 4 petitioner had taken certain loan Development Bank, Ambikapur, Tractor and he has also made rfe{ further submits that even after mart regard, huge amount against the p| the. Bank and the Bank is bent updp and they are also bent upon to ado|5t Learned counse! for the petfti' is ready and willing to deposit the| correct statement of account is sus|)pl this relief. This iimited relief souj petjtioner, at the time of hearing, is| for respondent no.1. He submits tl|iat qiNcpft^ imcfr ^'fecit rfsRzrc ^;3Tf^lT3tl^T isel for the petittoner. el for respondent no.1. Advocate for the State/ iled under Article 226/227 of the has prayed for a direction to of actual due amount payable 1 the loan case for which case •re the Deputy Registrar, Co- kapur. :ounsel for the petitioner that the rom the M.P. State Cooperative 3istt. Sarguja for purchasing ipayments in this regard. She :ing perjodicat repayments in ttiis atitioner has been determined by to adopt the process of -auction coercive methods. 'tioner submits that the petitioner outstanding amount provided a lied to him. She prays for only ght by learned counsel for the not opposed by learned counset hs wiil bs supplying a copy of _-—^£>-- XI-HC-22 3tI^T?iT RFTR;3TI^r ShWti W^ <-•• 1^1 ^ ^- 3^ •^i<iii-i<i, BiTn<ns, [Sirtiyy STI^T^ach _. _ y.^.^O- ^Wv[\ shKI* '"""""""""""'" 0^' 200^, Id'ti^ '/J^ sd^rgRfTWfffecr -z' statement of account kept in the rufes, to the petitioner, within Regarding mode pf supply, h^ accounts shall be sent by Regd. the recorded address of the peti< receipt will be kept by the Bank. In view 6f the above for the petitioner and the respondent no.1, this petition is that respondent no.1 shalf suppll account to the petitioner within the manner indicated above. This petition stands finalty): C.C. as per rutes. t>ook of the Bank according to the period of 15 days from today. submits that the statement of post with Acknowledgment due to Boner in the loan account and the statenlent subijnission made by leamed counsel made by learned counsel for jinally disposed of with a direction \^ a copy of the statement of loan period of 15 days from today, in <*i-iif<i'fl-i iiHrtTfftei:3'<Ri(<;i< ^siRmsn^r Sd/- suna^untar Judge Sinba (^y^)