HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 13th July, 2011 1st Bail Application No. 504 of 2011 Order on the bail application of the accused. Parvez S/o Sri Harun Rashid ……. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party In F.I.R. No. 62 of 2011 U/s 120-B, 363, 366 and 376 I.P.C. Police Station Bahadrabad District Haridwar Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. J.S. Virk, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder for the State. Allegation of rape against Ali is made out as per the statement of the victim. There is no allegation that the applicant was also involved in the commission of the crime. The only role specified is that he had come with a car. In view of the aforesaid, without commenting anything further on the merit of the case, the court is of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Consequently, Bail Application is allowed. Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in F.I.R. No. 62 of 2011, U/s 120-B, 363, 366 and 376 I.P.C., on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 13.07.2011 Shiv