IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2008 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 35329 of 2008(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. FAIZIN K.M., AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.K.M.KHADIRI RESIDING AT JESNA, KILIYANAD SCHOOL ROAD KOZHIKODE-1 2. EBIN V.AUGUSTINE S/O.AUGUSTINE, AGED 25 YEARS, RESIDING AT VALIYAPARAMBIL HOUSE KATHRIKADAVU, NEAR CBI ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI-17. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O.,THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT,OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O. THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY SC SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).35329/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 1st day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioners have completed their B.Tech (Information Technology) Degree Course for the year 2001-05 from MES College of Engineering, Kuttippuram. Apparently, dissatisfied with the marks obtained in one paper by the first petitioner in the 6th semester supplementary Examination held in December, 2007 and the second petitioner in one paper in the 4th semester supplementary Examination held in January, 2008, they had applied for revaluation. Petitioners are aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the 6th and 4th semester B.Tech supplementary Examination. Exts.P1 and P2 applications for revaluation are pending before the respondents. W.P.(C).35329/2008 2 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioner in relation to the 6th and 4th semester B.Tech Supplementary Examination, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the applications for revaluation are in order and otherwise correct. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs