''^ rw <ii*i^rr ti»»is®is •^^^rrq^^, ^T^FI^, t^Riray ^^Cf>^h^/^ ^""'—••••"•"•'"""""••""•"""•"^ 200 ^IT^T xraw.(^i?^^)- ^i^^i^fm ^T3?i1^ ^*ii^ 'FRHW^ft^^??^ FtTiTiQri^K Klieluram Chaiidrakar, Jaapad Ornct No. 15, Mah^ 1. State of Cl-4 School Educ^ tiattisgarh, through Secretary, ition Departinent^ Man.tralaya^ D.K.S. Bhaw^ii Commissionej iiistnictions, Distt, Educatl (CG) Priiicipal, Mahasamuudl Priiicipai, Siipur, Distt. WRiT FBTiTiGn' UNDSR 3, 4. o. |ii, Raipur, Distt.. Raipur (CG) Directorate of PubMc paipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) pn Ofilcer, Distt. MaJiasailiund Gdvt ARTi^LE OF SBt HON. BHPJ DHIP^.NDP-A M! 22-1-2009 Smt. Fouzia Mu'za, Advocat< ShriRakesh Jha, Dy, Govt i-iearci, The petitioner is aggrieve< whereby fhe respondent No. 1 h^ Uie petitioner dated 18-8-2008 d^ wim inim.ecliate effect aiici has petitioner tbr fiu-tlier promotion f^r 6 ofthe C.G. Promotion Rules, 20p3 '^iI^m^R ^R^ ^ fe^i' ^N^R ^ ^tl^ ^I^i Chaiidrakar, S/o Kishuiilal aged about 54 yeai's, R/o Behiad ', near High Schooi Ground, warci saiiiuiid- Distt: MsJia.saliiuiid ifC'G! G^vt, Higher Secondary School, District Maliasamund (CG) Higher Secondaiy School, |Maliasamund (CG) 226 OF TKB CONSTiTUTiGn' NDIA feHRA.. J ^ for the petitioner. |Adv., for tlie St.ate— by the order dated 14-10-2008 ^s caiioelleci me promoUon oixier ol |n the post of Lecturer (Economics) limposecl penalty of debaiiliig fhe two years WL accorclance witii Kule ^TB^T^k^n^T <M-1K^N—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000. 3n^r I°RT"f^N? 'TOT ^H^ST s»>*iict> ^, WWIT<(» '3^T T^l^j<rl^ ^Tl1<M^(o, [®l<rll^^< >£...C.S2..'aS.,M.ll/ WK ..LO;. "(T^200 3H^T T^F (yii^^) iF<nw^f^^Sff Tepresentajtion LeaiTLeci coiiiisel tor tlie p^t been iiaposecl on tlie petitionerj promotion, he has ah'eady jouiec| P-7 dated 6-10-2008. She furtlie|i7 Save been deban-ed for more thbii Rule 6 ofC.G. Promotion Rules, Leaiiied counsel for the ri petitioner files fresh raised in tliis petition along witlt before the respondent no. 2, he owu Hierit iii accordaiice witli la\ In view of Uie submissioj parties, this petition is disposed fresh representation for redress41 of tliis order before the respond| from toclay aiid oii sucii repre: No. 2 shall decide fhe same witiiliB. of receipt of fhe representation, law. It is farther directed representation decidecl, he may as Lectiirer (Economics), Govt, H| n cbl^^l^ "WR^f ^f fe^ <^l^i< '^sfRiH^TT^T titioner submits that the penaity has though complymg with. tlie order of on his promoteci post vide Aiiiiexure argiieci mat tlie peUtiouer coulci uot one yeai' as per tlie provisions ot [2003. ^sponcleiits submits that ui case tlie for redressal of his grievaiices a copy ofthis oiTierwithui 10 days diall decide the representation on its I7 withm. 6 weeks thereaffer, |i made by leanied courisei for the |ofwitfa llbert^' t.0thepetifioner to file of his gnevaace along with a copy ^nt No. 2 witliiii a period of 10 days mtation betag filecl, me respondent a penod ot O weeKs Irom Uie ciate l>n its owu ments in accoiUaiice witii piat. iii the meaiiwliile, till tlie pe permitteci to clisciiai'ge iiis ciuUes :|gher Secoudaiy School, Sirjjur. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge ^€t^^^^^uil^ iM^WIM—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000.