1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 412 OF 2008 Atmaram Govind Hadashi (since deceased through L.r.) Shankar Govind Hadashi (since deceased through L.rs) a) Parvatibai Shankar Hadashi & ors ........Appellants versus Kashiram Ratnu Hadahi (since deceased through L.Rs.0 a) Krishna Kashiram Hadashi & ors......... Respondents. Mr. A.S. Khandeparkar Adv. for the Appellants CORAM: RANJIT V. MORE, J. DATED : 01st DECEMBER,2008. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Khandeparkar learned counsel for the appellants. The appellant is the original plaintiff. His suit for partition and separate possession was dismissed by the trial court. The trial court's decree is confirmed by the lower appellate court. Both the lower courts below concurrently held that the appellants have no relations with the respondents. It is further held that the appellants failed to prove that suit properties 2 are undivided joint family property. In the teeth of this finding, appellant's suit was dismissed. The above said finding of facts were recorded after appreciation of evidence on record. The appreciation of evidence cannot be said to be perverse. No question of law much less substantial question of law is involved in this Second Appeal. Second Appeal is devoid of any merit and the same is accordingly dismissed. (R.V. More, J.)