IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR w.^P. (Sl No ^-3Y3 OF 2010 (S.Bl. PETITIONER <)..<»<f> f^S^ ^•^ ^y> ^>njls Ghana Ram Nag, (G. R. Nag) S/o. Shyam Lal Nag, aged about 58 years, Occupation Assistant Teacher, Primary School Kapaspoti, Block Narharpur, Districf Kanker (C. G.) VE RS U S RESPONDENTS 1. State of'Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) /<^wfl'^- '^>~<^\ \'y\ 2. District Education Officer, Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C. G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Kanker, Distt.Kanker (C. G.) Tt-e<»J<<v^ sWe-f' 4. Treasury Account and Pension, Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA The petitioner begs tosubmit as under:- PETITIONER RESPONDENTS HIGHeOURTClFCI-1HATT'ISG»<H:BILASPUR WRrr PETITION (S) N0.2313 OF 2010 Ghana Ram Nag \fersus StatecifChhattisgarh&Others (WritPetJtionunderArt!cle226QftheRonstitutionoflndia) Single Bench : Hon'ble Stifi SatishK Agnihotri, J. Present;- Gowri yhri^SomkantVemia,AdvdpatefoFthepetitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri; Panel Lawver for the State. ORDER(ORAU (Passedonfliis6mdayofMay,2P10) 1. Leamed cpunset appearingfbrthe petitionerSubrnitslhatthepetftibner was appointed initially EKtesisfantl'eacheron a fixed pay on probafton. After completion of his r®sp«ltweprobation peripd , the petitioner was granted regular pay scate. 1-earned counsef furthei'submtte that the issue inyolved m Ihe case is asto whsther the petitiDner is entitled to regular pay Scale w-e.^. ^the date pf initial appoirrtment or after completion of probation period. 2. Learned oounsel for the parties jointly submit that the isisue involved iiereln was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State ActmimsiFative Tribunal,Jabatpur(^sftGrtWe,Mr5inQA.No.2745/89(Afe<»'i*ant Yadu agd 56 Offiers vs. Sfate of^R. & dtters), wherein it wafrheld that thesimilariysituatedfeaGhereareeiitt^^oregylarpayscalew^ date of initjal appoiritmeht. Th& rn^er^ Court.The appeal WESClismiSsed bythe SupFenieCtourt, upholtiingthe decision of tbe Tribunal to 4he efleGt that the Teachers/tesistant Teachere are entitled to regular pay scale from date df initial appointment. ' : , ' ' :. . . ' : 1:': : •'• 3. In view of fhe above submissions made by taarned oounsel for the partl^, the pelffioner is;granledlibertyto makea representaBon 16 the respondent authorities, if so-advised, to consider his case ahd pass appropriata order, on jts pwn merit and in its perepective, in the light of the olxler passed by the SAT in Atecffi^nf Ya^ subsequently Gonfirmect by the Sypreme Coiirt in iSpeciai 1-eave Pefitjon (Cml)No. 6892^93 byorterdated 3-1-1994. ' 4. Accordingly, thewrit petitiqn isdisposed of. Sdt- Satteb^^? "~ 3udge ibotn -L