THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4103 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner/plaintiff filed this Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to revive the docket order dated 26.08.2009 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Avanigadda in I.A.No.648 of 2009 in O.S.No.63 of 2009. The petitioner/plaintiff filed the suit for permanent injunction along with I.A.No.540 of 2009 for temporary injunction. Pending the suit, the first respondent/first defendant filed the above I.A seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to note down the physical features of the plaint schedule property and also to note down whether there are any boundary bunds on either side of the schedule property and to file his report along with plan. In the affidavit filed in support of the impugned I.A., the first defendant stated that he is a cultivating tenant of the schedule land of Ac.0.42 cents in R.S.No.151/2 and Ac.1.22 cents in R.S.No.171 situated at Pedakallepalli Village. The Court below by the impugned docket order allowed the I.A appointing an Advocate Commissioner. Hence, this revision. The impugned order is purely a discretionary order and mere appointing an Advocate Commissioner to note down the physical features of the plaint schedule property will not cause prejudice to the petitioner nor the said order would attain finality. However, on filing report by the Advocate Commissioner, the petitioner can always raise objections on such report and if ultimately the suit is decided on the basis of the report, he can question the same in appeal. In view of the same, the petitioner cannot have any grievance at this stage and the Civil Revision Petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J Date: 22.07.2011 va