IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHAT’I‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (SJ No. 3M10/2009 Sanjay Verma S/o Vishram Singh Verma , Aged about 25 years, PETITIONER R/o Village Mohara, Police Station Suhela, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Janpad Panchyat Saja, Through: Its Chief Executive Officer, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS z 1. f State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Department of Panchayat and ’ Rural Development \D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector Durg District Durg(C.G.) Jila Panchayat Durg, Through: Its Chief Executive Officer, District Durg (C.G.) HIGHCO TOFC H SG AT IL PUR [/9 ‘7 WRIT PETITION (S) No. 2470 Qf2009 PETITIONER : Sanjay Vanna VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgam & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTHUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Presem: Shri Vivek Ramon, Advocate with Shri Sanjeev K. Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shli AV.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Advocaie for the respandent No. 4L ORAL ORDER (Passed , onTW 19 ,day of January, 2010) hamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on insmwtions, seeks permission of this Conn to withdraw this petition with liberty to mice recourse to altemative remedy that may be available to the petitioner under the provisions of law. 2. Learned coumel appearing for other side have ho objection. 3. It is ordered as prayed for. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty, if so advised. sir r sal- _ i ; Satish K. Agnihotrig ; ’i/ s . Judge \ Amit