IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC(T) No. 199 of 2008 Decided on: 22.10.2010 Gurdev …Petitioner. Versus Raghubir Singh and another. …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : None. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh Assistant Advocate General, for respondents. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The erstwhile learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal had directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization. It has come in the reply filed by the respondents on 31.12.2003 that since the petitioner had not completed 8 years' service, his case could not be considered. 2. Consequently, there will be a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner, if not already considered for regularization, immediately after the completion of 8 years' service. The petitioner shall also be held entitled to all the consequential 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- benefits. 3. In view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 22, 2010 (K. Attri)