1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.07.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.6296 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 Jesima ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, Home Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District. 3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Kottar Police Station, Kanyakumari. 4.Jiyavudeen ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 herein to initiate action against the fourth respondent and his men for ex-communicating the petitioner and her family members from Kottar, Kanyakumari District, forthwith. For Petitioner ... Mr.C.Chrishtopher For Respondents ... Mr.TR.Janarthanam, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 to R3 For R4 .. Dispensed with * * * * * ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to initiate action against the fourth respondent and his men for ex-communicating the petitioner and her family members from Kottar, Kanyakumari District, forthwith. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2. Mr.TR.Janarthanam, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. In view of the order which is going to be passed, notice to the fourth respondent, is dispensed with. 4. The petitioner has made a representation to the second respondent on 29.03.2011. 5. Without going into the merits of the claim of the petitioner and considering the nature of the relief sought for by the petitioner, the second respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.03.2011 and redress the grievance of the petitioner if there is any basis in such representation on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing all necessary parties. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned is entitled to decide the matter on its own merit as per law. 6.With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(R) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To: 1.The Secretary to Government, Home Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District. 3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Kottar Police Station, Kanyakumari rsb rl/4c – 29.7.2011 W.P.(MD)No.6296 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 20.07.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/