IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 5TH OCTOBER 2007 / 13TH ASWINA 1929 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3596 of 2007() ------------------------------ MC.94/2006 of SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, MUVATTUPUZHA .................... REVN. PETITIONER: PETITTIONER ----------------------------- VIJAYAKUMARI,D/O.K. NARAYANAN NAIR KOLLAPRAMBIL HOUSE, MALADYAKARA,MARADY VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA. BY ADV. SMT.SANDHYA RAJU SMT.RASHMI RAMESH RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER/STATE ----------------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE MUVATTUPUZHA,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 3. VILLATGE OFFICERS MARADY VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA. 4. BABY PHILIP MUNDIKUNNEL HOUSE, MARADY KARA MARADY VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA. 5. STATE REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.S.SIVAKUMAR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Crl. R.P. No. 3596 OF 2007 ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 5th day of October, 2007 O R D E R In as much as the grievance of the revision petitioner appears to be a private nuisance which may not fall under section 133 Cr.P.C., the learned counsel for the revision petitioner sought permission to withdraw the revision. Permission is granted and the revision petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. (V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE) aks