V, \^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHR1 T.P. SHARMA, J. *t^ APPELLANT (Non-Applicant) RESPONDENT: APPLICANT M.A.fPR) No.1761 of 2007 ^ >^ 6^-/^c 8 sEf) ce. '5~^30^w^L£- Smt. Asha Mano] W/o"S. Manoj Aged about 38 years, Present Address, R/o 18A/C Pocket, Maroda Sector, Bhilal, Tah. & Dist. Durg (C.G.) Versus S. Manoj S/o Lat. K. Surendran Aged about 40 years R/o M.I.G. 1/1048 Hudco Bhilai, Tah. & Dist. Durg (C.G.) Appeal Under Section 19 of the Familv Court Act Present: None for the appeilant. ORDER (2nd May, 2008) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. This matter is listed today for orders on the appellant's default in not filing an appropriate application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 2. The appeal filed by the appellant under Seetlon 1 9 of ithe Family Court Act on 18-06-2007 is reported to be time-barred by as many as 131 days. \\ 3. No application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal was fiied along with the appeat. In fact, no such appiication has been fiied tili date though a period of about one year has elapsed since filing of the appeai. 4. As t'ne appellant has miserably failed in showing any cause much iess sufficient cause for e delay in filing the appeal, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal as time-barred. 5. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed as time-barred. Sd/- Sd/- - ChiefJustice subbu T. P. Sharma Judge