IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23769 of 2011 ============================================= Meghu Yadav @ Pramod Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ============================================= 4 18-11-2011 This file has come under the heading „To be Mentioned‟ for the reason that the previous order dated 18.10.2011 of the present case has inadvertently or due to some technical problem in computer system got recorded in Cr. Misc. No.28769/11 (Santosh Choudhary vs. The State of Bihar). The same is restored to the present application i.e. Cr. Misc. No. 23769/11 (Meghu Yadav @ Pramod Yadav vs. The State of Bihar) which runs as follows:- “Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Loot is committed by 8 to 10 persons including this petitioner followed by rape, petitioner and 5 others are named in the F.I.R. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is about no recovery. For the rape, co-accused Satyendra Yadav is specifically named along with 2 to 3 more unnamed. Allegation, discussed above, does not justify bail to this petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner for bail is rejected”. Shailendra Bhushan Prasad/- (Mandhata Singh, J.)