IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. APP (DB) No.1152 of 2010 MANAGER CHAUHAN son of Kishun Chauhan, R/O Village Giridharpoiya, P.S- Kateya, Dist- Gopalganj. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Pradeshi chauhan son of late jatan Chauhan 3. Subhash Chauhan son of Manbodh Chauhan 4. Manbodh Chauhan son of late Naubat Chauhan. 5. Ram Chandra Chauhan Son of Late Ratan Chauhan. 6. Rameshwar Chauhan Son of Ram Chandra Chauhan. 7. Pramod Chauhan son of Pradesh Chauhan. All resident of Giridhar Poiya, P.S Kateya, Dist- Gopalganj --------- 6 22.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the appellant, and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of appellant nos. 2 to 7. Appellant has challenged the judgment and order dated 4.300.2010 passed by the Learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj in Sessions Trial No. 366 of 2008 whereby the trial Court has acquitted opposite party nos. 2 to 7 of the charges levelled against them. The prosecution case is that due to indiscriminate assault by the named accused persons the informant’s father received injuries and while he was taken to hostile he succumbed to his injuries. On behalf of the appellant it has been submitted that the informant and another witnesses have supported the prosecution version but learned Judge passed order of acquittal. The specific allegation was that due to indiscriminate assault by means of hard and blunt substance, the victim received a number of injuries but the doctor who conducted autopsy has found incised injuries by sharp cutting weapons and there is serious inconsistencies. In our view, the court below has rightly acquitted the accused persons. We find no merit to interfere with the impugned judgment. Accordingly this appeal is dismissed. Namita ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) ( Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)