IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35307 of 2010 SACHIDA NAND PANDEY S/O RAMVILAS PANDEY. -PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY 4 07.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with the carbon copy of the case diary. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and said recovery of A.K.47 from possession of the petitioner, who carries some criminal antecedent also, at this stage, I am not inclined to enlarge him on bail. Hence, the prayer is rejected. Simultaneously, the trial court is directed to proceed expeditiously with the trial and if it is not concluded within three years of the custody of the petitioner, he shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. AAhmad (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)