1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7933 OF 2009 Rajan Namdev Ekatpure & Ors. ...Petitioners vs. Maruti Shankar Ekatpure & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Surel Shah for the petitioners None for the respondents CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 22, 2009 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners are the original plaintiffs. The petitioners filed a suit for injunction. In the said suit, an application for temporary injunction was taken out. The said application was rejected by the trial court. The order of the trial court has been confirmed in the Appeal. 2 After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, I find that there is no error in the discretionary orders passed by the courts below by which an application for temporary injunction has been rejected. 3 It is obvious that the findings recorded by the courts below and in particular the findings of Appellate Court are in the nature of tentative observations made for a limited purpose of considering the prayer for interim relief. The suit will be decided without being influenced by the said observations. Subject to what is observed above, the petition is rejected. JUDGE