HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.664 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice P. Swaroop Reddy) Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, where there is no dispute about plaintiff No.1 being one of the daughters-in-law of defendant No.1 and though it is the claim of defendant No.1 that the property in question is her self-acquired property, the same cannot be accepted at this stage in view of the contention of the plaintiffs that property was purchased from out of the joint family funds. However, preventing alienation of entire property would work out hardship to the defendants. 2. In the circumstances, it is directed that the defendants shall not alienate entire land of Ac.1-56 cents in Survey No.199/1 and an extent of Acs.2-00 of land in Survey No.197/2 of Kothavalasa Village and Mandal. They can alienate other portion of the suit land. 3. With the above directions, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of. No order as to costs. _______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J September 28, 2010. ______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J PV