IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 25TH JUNE 2009 / 4TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 13508 of 2009(G) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- A.A.JAMAL,AGED 35 YEARS,S/O.AVARAN, MUNDETH HOUSE,VENGOLA,ARAKKAPADY, PERUMBAVOOR. BY ADV. MR.ESM.KABEER RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. VENGOLA GRAMA PANCHAYATH,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,VENGOLA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, VENGOLA P.O. 2. SENNA ABDUL AZEEZ,W/O.ABDUL AZEEZ, KADAVIL HOUSE,(PUTHENPURAYIL),KONJASSERY P.O, ARAKKAPADY. R1 BY ADV. MR.SIRAJ KAROLY R2 BY ADVS.MR.P.N.RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR, MR.P.VISWANATHAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/06/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.13508/2009 G APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.5494/1/04. P2: COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DT. 08/01/09 SHOWING THE JOINT NAME OF THE PETITIONER AND THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P3: COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DTD. 12/03/04 WAS EXECUTED IN BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P4: COPY OF THE RECEIPT TD. 31/03/09 ISSUED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P5: COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD. 06/05/09. P6: COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD. 14/10/08. P7: COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD. 20/03/09. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss WPC.NO. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO. 13508 OF 2009 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 25th DAY OF JUNE, 2009 JUDGMENT The issues in this writ petition relate to certain controversies between the petitioner and the second respondent as regards the license to run a Crusher Unit. Without expressing anything on merits, as rightly pointed out by learned counsel on all sides, this writ petition is ordered directing that Ext.P6 and P7 will be considered and disposed of by the competent authority, in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner and second respondent and after adverting to and considering all relevant materials. Let this be done within an outer-limit of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. All other issues left open. THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE lgk/26/6