IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.3217 of 2008 Date of Decision:- 29.05.2008 Barkate and others ....Petitioner(s) through Mr.Anil Kumar Garg, Advocate vs. Faryad Ali ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) This revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has been instituted for a direction to the Executing Court to expedite and dispose of the pending execution petition. A decree for maintenance was passed in favour of the petitioners on 8.3.2004. The respondent-judgment debtor impugned the same before this Court by way of R.S.A.No.1833 of 204. However, no stay was granted to him, rather it was directed that so long as the respondent- judgment-debtor would continue to pay the maintenance, the properties which are the subject-matter of the suit, would not be affected. It is averred by the petitioners that though they are struggling since the year 2005 through the execution proceedings, no amount of maintenance has been got recovered from the respondent-judgment debtor. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners, however, C.R. No.3217 of 2008 -2- without expressing any views on the merits of the case as no notice has been issued to the respondent, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this petition with a direction to the Executing Court to expedite and dispose of the execution petition as early as possible but not later than four months in accordance with law. May 29, 2008 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE