IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22483 of 2010 RAM NANDAN GUPTA @ RAMU S/o Baidhyanath Pd Gupta resident of Village Balughat PS Town Dist. Muzaffarpur Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR Opp.party ----------- 02/ 21.07.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being uncle of the husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under sections 304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of the D.P. Act. From impugned order, it appears that the police found case false against the petitioner and submitted final form but subsequently differing with the final form, learned Magistrate took cognizance. Considering the fact that the police found the case false against the petitioner but differing with the final form the learned Magistrate took cognizance, let the petitioner in the event of arrest/ surrender within twelve weeks from today be released on bail in connection with Town P.S. Case no. 512 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000-/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R.K.Bharti, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Muzaffarpur subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. shahid (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J))