_ aeb CcmgvHHe {N THE HbNzsL‘E HIGH (:éiukwé CHHATTISGARH \ T~é!ILA§PyR w.‘P.(S) No. 5123 200913.a,) Gouri Shankar Bahidar, S/o La'te Shri Ghasiram Bohidar, aged about 58 years, Occupation- Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Tamnar R/o Post — Tamnar Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 2, 'Balbhadra Prasad Dewangan, S/o Shri Ram Charan Dewangan, aged about 56 years‘ Occupation- Head Master, R/o Bhalidiya Near Gayatri Pragya Peeth, Boirdar, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Kayum Md. Khan, ’S/o Yusuf Md. Khan, aged about 61 years, Occupation — Head Master, Middle School, Sama Ruma, R/o Chandni Chowk, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Mahesh Ram Gupta, Slo Shri Manuram Gupta, aged about 54 years, Occupation - Head Master, Middle School Gorbahri, R/o Village+Post- Judda (Loing), Tah. & Distt. Raigaih (C.G.) Amril Lal Patel, S/o Shri Nand Ram Patel, aged about 53 years, Occupation- Head Master, Middle School Saraitola, R/o Dolesara, TahviTamnar, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) PETITIONERS 1. a7. ,Mm A wua€zL§Bnnm<zg1wugu ‘ zcoj mm (WEI) WWW WWW WWW fgxa %a@nww S E Haa’mp émtace Mf ai'itmker Ewakw gS-Qg-w‘m: Shri Scmkant Vemla, counssel ft)? ma pati‘tioaersv Smi. $mith'a Ghai, Panei Lawyer for ihe State. Counsei fer the petitimefS seeks permissian is withdyaw ihe pre$eni writ petition with Eberty ta fi’ge @;<)Y'gsen?atmn befare %he respandent No.- 2. H$ hmvevar s’ubmia ihait 53m?) directim’w may be é) r‘a issued Es the respendent Na. 1? far demding iinair repw$enta§ion expedit§ousiy to which mumai for i‘ne Siaie has no objecticn Accordingly, the Wm petitiml‘. i3 d§$m 83$ a3 withdraw: wiih ’zhe liberiy as afaresaéd. 2m ithe evemuaiiiy of fiiingg aw sum {epre$enta€ifm by the peti€iena¥s befO're the mspmgent N0. 2 raiaing a3? :hair gr§evamea i? is expectezi from the respandem Na. 2 m :‘ieisida ihe ‘ 5&ma considering aii the g‘ac‘tuai an‘j hegai a$par§t :3? ihe 921% a3 expedi‘icugiy a$ pa$§bla Sd/- { Pritinker Diwaker Judge Accordingiy, the writ petitim liberty as aforesaid. in the eventuaiity of iiiin i is dismissed as withdrawn with the ii any such repiesentation by the petitioners before the {espondent No. 2 raising ali their grievances, it is expected from the respon ent No. 2 to decide the-same considering ail the factuai an expeditiously as possible. Sd/- ‘Pritinker Diwaker ‘ legal aspect of the case as [‘5‘ Judge WWW Pgomzus§gl 2003 mm (Wat) WWW mmm Warsaw mwe‘wm $atftmanhr S B' Hon’ble Justice lVlr 9ritinker Diwaker 28-G8-201Qi1 . Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitioners, Smt. smitha Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State. Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to fiie representation beiore the respondent No: 2. He however submits that some direction may be issded/to the respondent No. :Z for deciding their representation expeditiously to which counsel for the State has no objection