i: aW§§§ W, C 9C/m’V (1) q3‘ JNf‘xHE‘“ Hl ,H COURT OF QHHATTISGARH AT $5” BILASPUR w WRIT PETITION S NO. 39! [2007 PETITIONER : mt. Sneh Lata Pandey ) W/o Late Shri Kamal Kant Pandey Aged about 43 years, AssistantTeacher, Govt. Primary School, Sector - 6, Bhilai, Block - Durg, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1/./" State of Chhattisgarh Through :- Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer District Education Office, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) / Block Education Officer Block Education Office, Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2{6/ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA @ HIGH COUkT g CHHA! !_I5§ARH AT BILA$PUR 1L P.(s)&391 «.2007 Pe1i+ioner : SIM. Sneh Lam Pandey Versus Responden'rs ': State of Chhnfrisgarh and o'rhers SB: Hon‘ble Mr. Jus'rice Safish K. Agniho‘m. J Present Mr. Rakesh Amhony, Advoca‘l: for fhe petitioner. Mr. Arvind Dubéy, Panel Lawyer, for 'th: respondenfs/Smn. i3 D 5.3 (Passed on fhis 23" Day of January, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for ihe petitioner as we" as for 'rhe State/respondents jointly submii fha'r iiie facts of the presenf urif pe'l'i'i'ion are similar to 'lhaf of in W. P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (SuiNil Timri and o'rhers vs. Slate 6overnmen'l' of Glha'Hisgarh & others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. They further aibmi‘t that 'the question of law involved is also flue same. 2. In View of the above-stated submissions made by learned counsel for 'the parties, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order dated 7.11.2006 passed by this Court in W.P. (5.) No. 5976/2006 (sushil Timri aid others vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh a others). No order as to costs. J Satish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge f Sdl- Bablu 3