IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 4790 of 2008 Between: B. Swamyreddy S/o late Venkat Reddy Managing Partner, Satawahana Filing Station, r/o 1-5-89, Kaman Road, Karimnagar. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Municipal Corporation of Karimnagar rep by its Commissioner, 2. K.Anil Kumar S/o Dakshina Murthy, R/o.1-5-81, Kaman Road, Karimnagar. 3. K. Aruna W/o K. Anil Kumar R/o 1-5-81, Kaman Road, Karimnagar. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction or Writ specially Writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to take action against the illegal and unauthorized construction of premises No. 1-5-81, 82 and 83, Kaman Road, Karimnagar of the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 under the provisions of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 by duly considering the objections of the petitioner and consequently declaring the inaction of the 1st respondent in not removing illegal and unauthorized constructions and further action of regularization of the unauthorized and illegal constructions of the respondent Nos. 2 7 3 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution of India and pass such other order or further orders as the Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.V.S.SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1: MR.J.KANAKAIAH, Standing Counsel. The Court made the following: O R D E R: This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing inaction of the Municipal Corporation, Karimnagar-1st respondent in removing the unauthorized constructions over the premises No.1-5- 81, 82 and 83, Kaman Road, Karimnagar, under taken by K.Anil Kumar-2nd respondent and K.Aruna-3rd respondent. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent-Corporation. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent-Corporation submits that in view of the Status quo order granted in O.S.No.66 of 2007 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Karimnagar, further steps have not been taken up in respect of certain unauthorized constructions undertaken by the respondents 2 and 3. 4. The factual aspect of Status quo order issued by the civil Court being in operation is not seriously controverted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. In that view of the matter, no direction can be given to the respondents 2 and 3 for removal of the unauthorized constructions, if any. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed at the admission stage. No costs. _____________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:11th June, 2008. cs ..... ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Karimnagar. 2. 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRT}