IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.17991 of 2011 Date of Decision.23.09.2011 Balbahadur Singh son of Jora Singh resident of Hamirgarh, Tehsul Phul, District Bathinda .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through Secretary Department of Revenue Punjab, Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Kamaljeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Notice of motion. 2. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of official respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner will supply three copies of writ petition to the counsel appearing for the respondents during the course of day for proper communication of the order. 3. The petitioner has serious apprehension that his life and liberty are at serious peril at the hands of respondent Nos.4 to 7. The petitioner is at liberty to approach 3rd respondent with his grievance and if such representation is made, the appropriate investigation shall be directed to be made on the grievance and protection of life and liberty shall be granted to the petitioner, if the situation so warrants. 4. The writ petition is disposed of. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 23, 2011 Pankaj*