T 3?T7^T'3FT'f^TW ^8H3TT^?T^RW '7^ ^ll^ld-4, ^•«<i<o,I®i<yti'M*l< ^^/fr^.M40c-?-"-^ ^IN^I(b*41<!b ~ / ain^T •'^sf! C^t^si^T) ^RTTW^f^T 3?T^r Sinale Bench; Hon'ble Jl w.p.rciN 236 (Petition under Article 22|i Petitioner : Jagdish Pras^ 48 years, R/c| Raipur (C.G.)| Vs Respondent 26.3.2009 Nagar Pa| Commission^r Mr. Sanjay Shyam Agarwal, Mr. Sanjay K Agarwal, Advoj for the respondent. Heard. By the instant petition under/j the petitioner is praying for directii extend benefit as per their own letter Learned counsel for the petit be disposed of in terms of the obs| Court in W.P. (c) No;1118/2009 (Jaj Nigam, Raipur) decided on 26.3.^ Learned counsel for the res| objection ifthe instant petition is In view of above, the instant order dated 26.3.2009 passed by tl (Jagdeo Singh Garcha Vs. Nagar Pa Consequently, I.A. No.1 also Certified copy as per rules. cttl^Id^fl'l "RFRTt ^f 'f^st' <Pn^i< ^ sfftFT 3T^5T ustice Dhirendra Mishra 1252/2009 of Constitution of India) id Chainani S/o Late Holaram, Aged Telibandha, Raipur, Tahsil & District Nigam, Raipur, Through , Nagar Palik Nigam, Raipur (CG) ^dvocate for the petitioner. ;ate with Mr. K. Shakeel, Advocate l.rticle 226 of the Constitutionof India >n to the respondent authorities to |dated 1.2.2009 (Annexure P-5). |oners submits that this petition may s^rvations & directions given by this i^deo Singh Garcha Vs. Nagar Palik 200^. >t>ondent submits that they have no disp(3sed of in the aforesaid terms. (etition is disposed of in terms ofthe |iis Court in W.P. (c) No.1118/2009 |ik Nigam, Raipur). |tands disposed of. ^Tbra JudS€ z