IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 11259 of 2009 Between: Uppalapati Kumari, W/o. Satyanarayana, Resident of Pidatamamidi Village, Gangavaram Mandal, East Godavari District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Social Welfare (LTR-2) Department, Secretariat Buildings,Hyderabad 2 The Addl.Agent to Government, East Godavari District (The Project Officer), at Rampachodavaram 3 The Special Deputy Tahsildar, Tribal Welfare, Gangavaram Mandal, East Godavari District. 4 The Tahsildar, Gangavaram Mandal East Godavari District ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus suspending the order of the respondent No.2 in CMA.No.118 of 2005 dated 1.12.2008 (arising out of LTRP.No.139 of 2004 on the file of the Special Deputy collector, (TW), Rampachodavaram) Pending statutory revision filed by the petitioner dated 07-4-2009 on the file of the 1st respondent Government against the said order in CMA.No.118 of 2005 dated 1.12.2008 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.R.SANKU & KAVITI MURLI KRISNA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.11259 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner herein claims to be in possession and enjoyment of Ac.7.00 cents of land situated in Sy.No.9-2A318 of Pidatamamidi Village of Gangavaram Mandal, East Godavari District. The Special Deputy Collector (Tribal Welfare), Ramapchodavaram, by order, dated 23.12.2004, made under Section 3 (1) of the A.P. Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation 1 of 1959 as amended by Regulation 1 of 1970 ordered ejectment of the petitioner from the land in question. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred CMA.No.118 of 2005 before the 2nd respondent – Additional Agent to the Government. The said Appeal was allowed by order dated 01.12.2009. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred a Revision Petition before the Government of A.P. on 7.4.2009 along with an application for stay of the ejectment ordered by the Special Deputy Collector. However, the petitioner’s Revision Petition has not been considered and no order has been passed even on his application for stay. Hence the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare appearing for the respondents. Since the Statutory Revision is pending before the 3rd respondent, it would be appropriate to protect the possession of the petitioner till the said Revision Petition is disposed of in accordance with law. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the 3rd respondent to dispose of the Revision Petition pending on its file as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of this order. Till such time, the order of ejectment passed by the Special Deputy Collector (Tribal Welfare, Rampachodavaram, dated 23.12.2004 as confirmed on Appeal by the 1st respondent shall remain suspended. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt. 09.06.2009 mrb