( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5750 OF 2010 Appasaheb s/o Baburao Sonake and others PETITIONERS VERSUS Rajendra s/o Balasaheb Katake and others RESPONDENTS .... Mr. P.G. Mahalankar, advocate for the petitioners. .... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 2nd July, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. The petitioners are allegedly nephews and niece of deceased Parwatibai. The succession proceedings were initiated by the respondents vide Misc. Appeal No. 2/2010. In their appeal, they sought ad-interim stay by filing application (Exh-5). The application has been rejected by the first Appellate Court. 3. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and on going through the impugned order, it is amply clear that the respondents could establish their claim as grand-children of the deceased and having regard to such strong prima facie ( 2 ) case in their favour, the stay application was rejected. The appellants are only remotely related to the deceased. No substantial reason is apparent to interfere with the discretionary order impugned herein. Petition is dismissed. The hearing of the appeal shall be expedited. No costs. [V.R. KINGAONKAR] JUDGE NPJ/wp5750-10