IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.7534 of 2010 RENU DEVI wife of Aditya Singh, Resident of village- Medhakuri, P.S. Sirdala (Meskaur), District- Nawada ….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & 2. Murari Kumar son of Late Devendra Singh, resident of village- Behari, P.S. Nawada, District- Nawada, …Opposite Parties ----------- 2/ 30.11.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order 17.03.2007 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, by which cognizance has been taken under sections 306, 201/34 Indian Penal Code in Sirdala (Meskaur) P.S. case no.89 of 2005. The petitioner has sought quashing on the ground that when the other co-accused were put on trial none of the witnesses supported the case of the prosecution and, therefore, they were acquitted and the trial of the petitioner was totally unwarranted. I am unable to appreciate the contention raised on behalf of the petitioner since is well known that evidence of a particular trial is relevant only to the extent that it being adduced in that trial. Under the circumstances, I see no merit in the application. The application is dismissed. However, in the interest of justice, if the petitioner appears before the court concerned within four weeks, she shall be released on bail on the surety to be fixed by the court below. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)