IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.49177 of 2008 1. UMANATH RAI, son of Sakaldeep Rai 2. Binod Kumar Singh, son of Late Ramanuj Singh, Both are Resident of Village- Rasalpura, P.S.- Doriganj, District- Chapra. ---------- Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ---------- Opposite Party. ----------- 2 12.1.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioners are accused in a case under Sections 420, 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation in the complaint petition is that the petitioners are said to have taken cash to ensure that the complainant’s son would get employment in the railways. Learned counsel submits that the complainant’s son had appeared for the railway examination and he was amongst the successful candidates. However, the petitioners who are regular employees of the railway had filed an O.A. before the Central Tribunal at Kolkata and a writ application in the High Court at Kolkata making a prayer that the casual laboures working in the Eastern railway should immediately be adjusted against vacancies before the regular and direct appointments are made. It is submitted that being aggrieved by the writ application etc. filed by the petitioners, the complainant has filed this false and frivolous case as his son has not been given the letter of appointment although he has succeeded in the railway examination. Be that as it may, petitioners namely Umanath Rai and Binod Kumar Singh are directed to be released on anticipatory bail in 2 the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case No. C1725/07 on furnishing bail bond of rupees ten thousand each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gopalganj subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)