IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Cr.M.M.O. No.209 of 2010. Date of decision:13.5.2011 Beli Ram Shyam & Others … …Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Another … …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Dev Darshan Sud,J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 No. For the Petitioners: Mr.D.N Sharma, Advocate. For Respondent No.1: Ms.Shubh Mahajan, Deputy Advocate General. For Respondent No.2: Mr.N.S. Chandel, Advocate. Dev Darshan Sud,J. The petitioner seeks quashing of proceedings by invoking the provisions of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on the ground that the case registered against the petitioner herein is false. I need not delve into the case in detail, as it is undisputed before me that two FIRs namely, FIR No.66 of 2010 and 65 of 2010 have been registered by the petitioners herein as also the respondents. In these circumstances, it is but obvious that the police is required to investigate both the cases. To exercise 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? Yes. 2 powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure at this stage would only amount to grant credibility to the version of one or the other party, which exercise cannot be undertaken in these proceedings at this stage. In the facts and circumstances of the case this petition is disposed of. Needless to add that both the cases arising out of both the FIRs (supra) which have been registered on the same day shall be tried together by the Court. Petition stands disposed of. May 13, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud) (aks) Judge.