IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30147 of 2010 BINDA SAH SON OF DANI SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KAITHWALIA, P.S.SUGAULI,DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 6.12.2010. Heard Mr. Sushil Kumar No.3 learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Kumar Priya Ranjan learned counsel for the State. The petitioner, who is in custody since 9.6.2009 in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No.131 of 2007 for the offences under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code on accusation of killing of his own daughter, has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and his entire family members were falsely implicated as per the instance of the informant himself, who is non-else but Chaukidar of the local area. It has been submitted that during investigation none of the witnesses has alleged against the petitioner save and except the witnesses who are hearsay witnesses. This fact has not been controverted by learned counsel for the State and it was also submitted that in the present case there is no eye witness. However, it was submitted that during postmortem examination number of injuries were found on the person of the deceased. Accordingly, he has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Keeping in view the fact that the petitioner was made accused only on the basis of weak circumstantial evidence, let petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of F.T.C.-IV Motihari, East Champaran in S.Tr. No.122 of 2010 arising out of Sugauli P.S. Case No.131 of 2007. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)