THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY WRIT PETITION No.7366 of 2001 Date: 22.08.2007 Between: C. Veera Vasantha ..... PETITIONER AND 1. Sri Krishna Devaraya University, Rep. by its Registrar, Ananthapur and two others. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY WRIT PETITION No.7366 of 2001 ORAL ORDER: The petitioner filed this writ petition for issuance of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the second respondent in issuing Transfer Certificate and Conduct Certificate, as illegal and arbitrary, and for a consequential direction to the second respondent to issue the said certificates to her. It is stated that on completion of Intermediate Course, the petitioner has chosen to study Bachelor of Computer Application and accordingly she got seat in the second respondent college, joined in first year B.C.A. Course, and persuaded her first year study in it. Thereafter, due to the transfer of her father to Nandyal and as there is no hostel accommodation in the second respondent college, she sought for transfer to pursue her II year B.C.A. Course at S.R.Degree College, Nandyal. Accordingly, she was transferred to S.R.Degree College, Nandyal, where she persuaded her II year B.C.A. The first respondent has approved her transfer subject to the condition of sanctioning one extra seat to accommodate her as a special case. When the third respondent i.e the Principal of S.R.Degree College, Nandyal was insisting for Transfer Certificate and Conduct Certificate, she approached the second respondent and requested to issue the same. As the second respondent was not issuing the said certificates to her, she filed the present writ petition. On 18.04.2001, this Court, while admitting the writ petition, issued an interim direction directing the third respondent to permit the petitioner to write III year B.C.A examination, without insisting Transfer Certificate and Conduct Certificate. Accordingly, she was permitted to appear III year examination. In spite of listing the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, none appears for the petitioner as well as the respondents, except the counsel for the respondent, who is a proforma party. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J Date: 22.08.2007 va