c^1^. IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETTTEONER RESPONDENTS ^ WRIT PEnTION7s')NO.^J.??.../20lO ^MGIE BENC! Lewin Patel, Son of Shn' Jawahar Lal Patel, aged about 49 years (U.D.T.), R/o. Village Padigaon, Block Pusour, District Raigarh, working in Govt. Pre-Middle Schpol, Sotma, Biock Pusour, District Raigarh (C.6.), VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Thr'ough : The Secretary, Education Depart- ment, &.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.6.) District Educatin Officer, Raigarh, Distnct Raigarh (C.6.), 3.' Block Education Officer, Pusour, bistrict Raigarh (C.6.) ^A^ 2. A?' .* <; ^' c' ?y.c^ <:'• -.y WRIT PETCTEON UNDER ARTLCLE 226 OF THE COUNSTETUTCON OF INDIA XI-HG—7 7S[ -4|A||d-4, ^tlly'Ko, ^|dl-My,< !.P.CS-)C<..G,oi<&ik sn^r IT^R' (yi^s?) sn^;w h-H* ^TTSTI^TsfwN? WITW ^lftg 311^1 coiuisel for t] ai, P.L. for fh| 21.10.3010 ShriR.S.i Counsel for fhe petitioner ^ entifted to benefit of two advancel haviag passed D.Ed. examinatiori own cost. It is subniitted that the petition is no longer res integra a decided by the Hon'ble Supreine It is further subruitted that similai- view in. its order dated 6. 6257/2008. Coimsel for fhe petiti order dated 29..4.2010 passed ir whereia relyiag upon fhe judgmen case ofAsha Saxeua (supra) and 1 in another V/rit Appeal No. 87; issued for consideration of ftie c; iacreiaerLts as per circular dated : of Madhya Pradesh, after verificati petition. Counsel for ffae State sub would also be considered on tlie +Wt<'l'ii)-l 'qPRff if fei^t 'rfiff^TC ic petitioner. .ubiaits tbat fhe petitioner is increinents on account of he after his appom.tm.ent at his issue involved ia fhe present ad the same bas been firsaUy Court ia the case of Aslia S009 {IE!|MPJR (SCj S9. this Court has also taken a 2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. bner further submits that the Writ Appeal N0. 124/2009, f. of fhe Supreine Court ia fhe |ie order passed by this Court 2009. directions bave been kse for graat of two advance il.9.1974 issued bv the State ^>n of the facts pleaded in fhe mtts that case stoae itaes. T- XI-HG—78 'S^i '^WKW, »til'y4is, f6<<yii'Mlj,< ..U.^....O?l...G^;....?b.i.ilto ST^T T^7 (Tj^q^q) an^i w h-u'h ^^ 37T^T sh^l TOTOre^ftgsn^i In view of above, the pe] direction to the icspondent authoj petitioner for graat of two advan| dated 21.9.1974 issued by the ^ verificatioa of the facts pleaded ]u\ eight weeks fix>ra today. tt))^l[<Tl^1'T Hi^<rff ^T f^^i tf^T^R ^siRmsn^i tition is disposed of with a ities to decide the claiiu of the •e uicrenients as per circu3ar tatc of Madliva Pradesh after fhe petition within a period of Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge