IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 504 OF 2006 VILLAGE PANCHAYAT OF PENHA DE FRANCA THROUGH ITS SARPANCH, BRITONA, BARDEZ GOA. ... Petitioner Versus SHRI FERNANDO REBEIRO, PORVORIM, BARDEZ GOA. & ANR ... Respondents Mr. Vivek Rodrigues, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Guru Shirodkar, Addl. Govt Advocate for the respondent No.2. Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Coram:- D. B. BHOSALE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 10th December, 2007 P.C. In this writ petition, which was admitted on 26.7.2007, the respondent had filed a reply dated 22.3.2007. In paragraphs 6 & 7 of the affidavit, the respondent has made following statements. " I say that the Parking Stilt Area was only enclosed for the security and safety reasons. I say that the Parking Stilt area is not used for any other purpose except for parking." " I say that only the Parking Area has been enclosed for safety reasons. Hence, there is no deviation from the Plans as far as Building is concerned." In view of the statements made in the affidavit,learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdraw this writ petition. Writ Petition, accordingly, stands disposed of as withdrawn. D. B. BHOSALE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. SMA