-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 581 OF 1998 IN COMPANY APPEAL NO. 3 OF 1998 Indo Saudi (Travels) Pvt. Ltd. and others ... Appellants versus Mrs. Michelle Jawad Al-Fahoum and others ...Respondents Mr. S.K. Srivastav, instructed by M/s. S.K. Srivastav & Co., for the appellants. Mr. F.E. Devitre, Senior Counsel, with Mr. Vishesh Malviya, instructed by M/s. Federal & Rashmikant, for respondent Nos. 1, 5,6 and 7. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & R.V. MORE, JJ. DATE: DECEMBER 15, 2009. P.C. At the time of hearing of this appeal, the Court is informed by the respective counsel appearing in the matter that the dispute is amicably settled between the parties. The consent terms duly signed by the concerned parties and their Advocates are taken on record and marked “X” for the purpose of identification. 2. On behalf of the appellants, its Managing Director, Mr. Mohammad Zakaullah Siddiqui, appellant No.2, is present and he states that the consent terms are signed by him after fully understanding the contents of the same and -2- the same is acceptable to him. Respondent No.1, Mrs. Michelle Jawad Al- Fahoum, is present and she states that she has gone through the consent terms and the same are acceptable to her. 3. In clause 2 of the consent terms it is provided that the children of respondent No.1 viz. (a) Ms. Hana Al-Fahoun,(b) Ms. Reema Al-Fahoum and (c) Mr. Mohammed Jawad Al-Fahoum have also got interest in the matter and they may be permitted to be joined as respondent Nos. 5, 6 and 7 as they have become major. The consent terms are also acceptable to them and they have also signed the same. Accordingly, leave to join the children of respondent No. 1 as respondent Nos. 5, 6 and 7 is granted in the present proceedings. Cause title be amended accordingly. 4. It is pointed out that respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 may be allowed to be deleted from the proceedings, as no relief is sought against them. Permission granted. Appeal to stand dismissed against respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4. 5. In clause 16 of the consent terms, it is provided that the civil/criminal cases, if any, filed against each other shall be withdrawn. In this behalf, we may clarify that so far as criminal cases are concerned, if they are compoundable, the same can be disposed of in accordance with law in view of these consent terms. -3- 5. The learned counsel for the appellants has assured the Court, in the form of an oral undertaking, that the cheques which have been given to respondent No.1 shall not be bounced back. The said oral undertaking is accepted. The undertakings mentioned in clauses 10, 11, 12, 13 and 16 are also accepted. 6. The appeal is accordingly disposed of in view of the consent terms. The order passed by the learned single Judge as well as by the Company Law Board is substituted by the present consent terms. 7. Issuance of certified copy is expedited. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. R.V. MORE, J.