1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.310/2008 Rameshwar Lal Versus State of Rajasthan and others Date of order ::: November 17,2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PREM SHANKER ASOPA Mr.Kamlesh Pareek, for the petitioner Dr.A.S.Khangarot,Addl. GA Mr.C.S.Chouhan, for the respondent With the consent of parties, this writ petition is being decided at the admission stage. By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned notice dated 21.4.2007 and 12.11.2007 inter alia on the ground that the Panchayat has once granted permission for construction vide order dated 6.4.2007 and now issued the notice for reconsideration whereby the construction has been stayed and the petitioner was asked to wait for the further orders. The similar notice was given on 12.11.2007 with the further condition that in case the construction is continued then the same would be demolished. Counsel for the petitioner submits that having issued the permission, there is no justification for reviewing the order simply on the basis of the complaint of Shanker Singh, neighbourer on which order has been passed on 21.4.2007. Counsel for the applicant is claiming right and interest over the property in dispute therefore,he has filed the 2 application for impleadment as party. I have considered the aforesaid aspect of the matter and in my view, when the issue is pending before the Panchayat there is no justification to interfere with the same. However, it is directed that the Panchayat shall not demolish the construction without finalising the issue of permission after affording opportunity to the parties including Shanker Singh. The writ petition is disposed of. Two months' time is granted to the respondents for compliance of this order. In view of the disposal of the writ petition,no order is required to be passed on the application for impleadment. (PREM SHANKER ASOPA) J. गोपाल