IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN MONDAY, THE 7TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 16TH BHADRA 1931 WA.No. 1798 of 2006() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.17958/2006 Dated 10/07/2006 .................... APPELLANT(S): PETITIONER ------------------------ 1. ABRAHAM.K.THOMAS, KARIMKUTTIYIL HOUSE, ANGADI P.O., RANNY, KERALA. 2. MATHEW ABRAHAM, DO. 3. M.T.ABRAHAM, DO. BY ADV. SRI.P.R.VENKATESH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY G.P. SRI.N.MANOJ THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & V.K.MOHANAN, JJ. .................................................................... Writ Appeal No.1798 of 2006 .................................................................... Dated this the 7th day of September, 2009. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Appellant claimed interest for belated payment of bill amount by Government. In fact, the matter is coming up before this court in the second round. It is seen from the judgment of the learned Single Judge that in the first round the matter went up to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court directed the petitioners to move before appropriate court claiming interest, if they are eligible. The petitioners again filed representation before the Government and approached this court for a direction to consider the representation. Obviously petitioners want to get over the judgment of the Supreme Court and want the matter to be settled in writ proceedings. The learned Single Judge, however, declined relief by clarifying that civil suit is the right remedy. We do 2 not find any ground to interfere with the judgment of the learned Single Judge. Consequently Writ Appeal is dismissed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge V.K.MOHANAN Judge pms