IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35869 of 2008 PRAMOD KUMAR SAO @ PRAMOD KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 19.09.2008 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to make some necessary correction in the date of birth of the petitioner, as mentioned in Para-9 of the petition. He is permitted to do so. The correction is made in course of the day. Heard The F.I.R. was lodged under Sections 398(A), 341, 323,504/34 of the IPC by informant Nilam Kumari who has alleged that she had fallen in love with the petitioner whom she claims to have married on 23rd October 2002 with the consent of family members of both sides and an affidavit was also sworn in before the Notary Public. She also went to her Sasural, but subsequently, she was tortured and harassed and was sent back to her Maika. As also averred in Para-9 of the application, learned counsel submits that the date of birth of the petitioner, as mentioned in his Matriculation Certificate is 10th January 1990 and, thus, he would be aged only 12 years on the date of marriage. It is also submitted that the learned Sessions Judge has also mentioned that in the Medical Examination of the petitioner, as held in the year 2007, he was found aged 19-20 years. Further submissions that the petitioner is in custody since 28th March 2008 and, thus, he has remained in custody for nearly six months. - 2 - Mr.Upendra Kumar, learned A.P.P. does not point out any other material. Under the circumstances, petitioner Pramod Kumar Sao @ Pramod Kumar is admitted to bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.K.Singh, J.M.,Jehanabad in Rampur Chauram P.S.Case No.5 of 2007. Jay/ (C.M.Prasad,J)