1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 928 OF 2008 Ranjitsingh S/o Ambarsingh Rajput and others Versus Chotusingh S/o Onkarsingh Rajput and another. *** Mr. Pravin S. Patil, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. P. B. Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Mrs. B. R. Khekale, A.P.P. for the Respondent No.2/ State. *** 1. Heard learned counsel. The grievance to the order dated 26th September, 2007 is, that the learned Judge should have recorded evidence of the two witnesses, afresh. The order is absolutely in terms of section 326 (1) of Criminal Procedure Code. No interference is warranted. Application rejected. 2. Liberty to the accused/ applicant to apply to the learned Judge to recall of the witnesses and it is for the learned Judge to independently deal with the application on its merits. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:28/08/2009. ans/928