IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.14351 of 2009 Between: D.Padmanabha Naidu S/o Late Lingam N.R Kammapalle,Thimmarajupalle Post Ramachandrapuram(M) Chittoor District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh by the Collector Chittoor District 2 The Southern Power Distribution Company of A.P Limited rep.by its Superintending Engineer (Operations) Thimmarajupalle Tirupathi 3 The Chief Executive Officer Zilla Praja Parishad Chittoor Town and District 4 The A.P State of A.P Co-Operative Rural Irregation Corporation rep.by its Deputy Executive Engineer Chittoor District .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.SESHADRI NAIDU Counsel for Respondent No.2:MR. S.V.RAMANA FOR MR. O.MANOHAR REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner questioned the action of the respondents in seeking to locate 33/11 KV Sub-station in the premises of Zilla Parishad High School, Nethakuppam, Ramchandrapuram Mandal, Chittoor District. At the hearing, Sri S.V.Ramana, learned counsel representing Sri O.Manohar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents placed before this Court a fax copy of letter, dated 16.07.2009 addressed by the Superintending Engineer, Tirupati, wherein it is inter alia stated that the site for location of 33/11 KV Sub-station was provisionally selected in the premises of Zilla Parishad High School at Nethakuppam and on the objections raised by the Head Master of the School and the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Chittoor, the said proposal was dropped and alternatively, another site was selected in the same Village where Rural Electrification Corporation sanctioned the Sub-station. It is further stated therein that the said site is different from the one, which was earlier selected in the premises of Zilla Parishad High School and away from the school and the hostel. Sri D.Seshadri Naidu, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of the said decision to shift the location for erection of Sub- station, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. For the above-mentioned reasons, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.18812 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 17th JULY, 2009. kvni