IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CR.APPLN/5132/2010 BALAJI RAJENDRA MAGAR V/S STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR WITH CR.APPLN/5131/2010 MANOHAR DNYANOBA MAGAR AND ORS V/S STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ... Shri R.N.Dhorde, Advocate for applicants and Shri V.H.Dighe, APP for respondents. ... CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL,J. Dated : January 10, 2011 PER COURT :- 1. Heard respective counsel. 2. In a family feud from the enjoyment/distribution of the agricultural properties, civil proceedings were initiated by the complainant being RCS No.188 of 1997 against Manohar and others. However, he faced its dismissal in default. Now, he has moved the police informing that he did not affix thumb impression on the consent letter, and it has been falsely prepared, it is a forged document. Investigation is sought in terms of Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 3. The nature of the accusations indicated above does not require custodial interrogation barring warranting their specimen of thumb impressions / signatures of applicants. Care can be taken for the same. CR.APPLN/5132/2010 (2) 4. In the event of arrest of the accused / applicants in Crime No.12 of 2010 registered with Tuljapur Police Station the accused / applicants be released on executing PR bond of Rs.15,000/- (Rs.Fifteen Thousand only/-) with one surety in the like amount each. The accused / applicants shall furnish their specimen thumb impressions / signatures whenever mandated by the Investigator. The accused / applicants shall not influence or coerce the prosecution witnesses. The accused / applicants shall attend the Investigator on every Sunday between 6 to 8 pm till 28.2.2011. 5. Both applications are allowed to the extent above. (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) ... akl