HIQH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR. WRIT I^TITION (Sl No. 4902/2007 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1. Smt. Meenakshi Wazalwar, aged about 49 years, wife ofShri Deepak Raon Wazalwar, posted as Lecturer, at Govt. Higher Secondary School, Tarbahar, Biiaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, R/o Viaobha Nagar, Bilaspur(C.G). Versus State of Cbliattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S Bhawaa, Raipur(C.G) 2. The Director, Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh, H.Q. Raipur (C.G.) 3. The District Education Officer, BUaspur, Distt. Bilaspur Writ Petttion undet Atticle 226 ofthe Coustitutioa oflndla ^- Sbri Rajkumar Gupta, Couiisel for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Psuudey, Pauel Lawyer for the State on advance copy- ORAL ORDER SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard on adinission. Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has passed M.Ed., exainuiation on her own. expenses, fherefore, she is entitied to receive two advaace iacrenients accordiag to circulars dated 24.12.1998 & 01.3.1999. He also subimts that ia many identical matters, the petitions have been allowed iu terms of the order passed m fhe case of Yashwemt Kunwr BhtirtiOwct} Vs. Municipal Coiyoration, Dwy and another (2006 (J^ SSPJR-CG 96). He submits fhat the case of fhe petitioner is squarely covered by the said decision. ^" - J- E.^.--.-. ...-.—.JL.^^C"':.—.: (2) WRIT PETITION (Sl No. 4902/2007 This legal position is not disputed by leamed counsel for fhe State. However,she submits fhat fhe order luay be passed in tenns of the said judgment, but it shall be subjected to verification regardiag petitioner^s such qualification. Accoidingly, fhis writ petition is aUowed ia tenas of fhe order passed in case of Yashuiant Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. Munidpat Corporation, Durg and another (supra) subject to veri&catioii of fhe facts as to whefher the petitioner had acquired B.Ed.,/M.Ed., Examiuation Certi&cate on her own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 & 01.3.1999 and further whether she has beeu paid two advauce iacreinents or not. This petitiou staads finaUy disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd;- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge fRao/ ^-