1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5600 OF 2004 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JANUARY 18, 2007. Heard Shri Ghate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ahirrao, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and Shri Kankale, learned AGP for respondents No. 2 & 3. The Divisional Social Welfare Officer has in the impugned order found that the petitioner has failed to prove that she was in regular service as Special Teacher during 1991 to 1998. One of the reasons is that she could not produce any appointment order. He has relied upon the xerox copy of Muster Roll produced by her to find that she was not working from 1992 to 1995 as Special Teacher but as Assistant Teacher. In paragraph 2 of the order, he has relied upon a letter dated 13.10.1999 issued by the Tahsildar which states that the petitioner worked from July 1995 to June 1998 under the Scheme for 2 educated unemployed persons and she has also received honorarium therefor. This finding has not been demonstrated to be erroneous or perverse anywhere in the petition. In view of the letter dated 13.10.1999, which is not disputed in the petition, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.