IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19159 of 2010 AJAY YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14.6.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case arising from Goh P.S.Case No.175 of 2009 for the offence punishable under Sections 302,201/34 of the Indian penal code. Substance of allegation as set out in the first information report against the petitioner is of taking the father of the informant on 15.11.2009 and after which he was missing. Subsequently the headless body of the informant’s father was recovered on 26.11.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner, relying upon the first information report itself, submits that in terms of the statements made in the first information report, this petitioner has been said to be a good friend of the father of the informant. He further submits that though the father of the informant had accompanied the petitioner on 15.11.2009 and was traceless since therafter, there is no explanation for the delay in instituting the case after 11 days and merely on the ground of last seen with the deceased, the 2 petitioner has been implicated in the case. He then submits that there is no criminal history against the petitioner and who has a good antecedent. Having regard to the submissions aforesaid, let petitioner Ajay Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar in connection with Goh P.S.Case No.175 of 2009, subject to the conditions that the petitioner would cooperate in the proceedings and would be attending the court below on each and every date fixed and on failure on his part in attending the court on two consecutive dates fixed without a reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the court below, the court below would be entitled for cancellation of his bail bond and for taking him into custody. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)