IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6917 of 2010 RAMAKANT RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR 2 26.2.2010 Heard Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.A. Haque, Addl.P.P. for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that according to the F.I.R. on 8.8.2008 co-accused, Santosh Ram, had taken the deceased for getting some dispute settled with co- accused, Sharma Kahar. A village panchayati is said to have taken place at the house of the petitioner who is said to be Ex- Mukhiya. It further transpires that while returning, after the panchayati was over, the deceased was killed and allegation of killing is against one co- accused, Satish Yadav, Ajay Mehta and two other persons. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is similar and identical to that of co-accused, Sharma Kahar and Santosh Ram, who have been granted bail by a bench of this Court by order dated 5.8.2009 passed in Cr.Misc. No.10270/09 and Cr.Misc. No.15183/09 respectively and that order has been appended as Annexure-2 to the bail petition. Learned counsel for the State has not disputed the aforesaid position. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount 2 each to the satisfaction of J.M. Ist Class, Bhojpur at Ara, in Ajimabad P.S. Case No.32 of 2008 AnilKr.Sinha (Birendra Prasad Verma,J.)