W/LQOI/ ”7 @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CG) WRIT PETITION N0. @35 /200q/ PETITIONER _ : Lakhan Lal Satnami, S/o. Sukhram Satnami? agedyzyears, R/o. Village- Arand, Tahsil - Rajim / Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ; : ? , 1. Mehtaru, R/o. Gram-Arand, S/o. Late Ramadhin, Post-Basin " Tahsil - Rajim Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) 2. Smt. Sam Bai, W/o. Narayan, Gram - Sunderkera, Post - Abhanpur, Tahsil - Abhanpur Distt. — Raipur (C‘G) 3. Smt. Rambai , W/o. Ghuchu, (ham - Sender, Post &‘ Tahsil - Fingeshwar, Distt. - Mahasamund (CG) . Bharat Satnami, S/o. Sukhram Satnami, Tahsil - Rajim Distt‘ - Raipur (C‘G.) 5. State of Chhattisgarh Through - ColTector Rajpur (C.G.) / R/o. Gram-Arand, ,an-ma Q“ “LT 37f3% \x’ > PETITION UNDER ARTICLE — 226/2Z/OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY, MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION The petit?‘ [er named above most respectiillly shewth as under : PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER : As per the cause title. a / / w » x ‘ T [11% W! XI—Hc-zz W W méywr mm mm mmmm mmitrwm $Wenéw (5%; aware 3m swish K. Agnihoy, J.) 02.12.2008 Shr’: Vivek Rafhore, Advocafe appearing on behalf of Shri Y.C.Shcrmd, Advocm‘e for the peTHioner: Shri Bhaskar Poyasi, Panel Lawyer for ”(he S’rcfe/respondenf No. 5. On fhe request df Shr'l Rafhme, fwo weeks time 5s grcm‘ed To ' make good ’rhe defouh‘ as poin'ed ouf by fhe office, failing which ihe peiiiion sholi s’rond dismissed for won? of prosecution. wiihouf reference To ihe Cour’r. Sci/- Satish K. Agnihotri zit} Judge ‘ Ami?