1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 7011 of 2010 Decided on 15.11.2010. Jai Krishan & others ….Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Nimish Gupta, vice Counsel. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim work charge status from the date they completed 10 years of service. Reliance is placed on the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P. and others, 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316. 2. The learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The petitioners may file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the second respondent within a period of one month from today. The second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in the light 2 also of the decision referred to above within a period of another four months. The petitioners will produce a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of this judgment referred to in this judgment while submitting the representation(s). 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. November 15, 2010. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (hl) Judge.