R.S.A No. 562 of 2008 (O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A No. 562 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision : November 03, 2009 Harjinder Kaur @ Joginder Kaur & ors ...... Appellant (s) v. Sohan Singh and others, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. J.S.Bhandohal, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Balbir Singh, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2.. Mr. Vijay Lath, Advocate for L.Rs No.I, II, V & VI of respondent No.3, and respondents No.4 & 5. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This appeal has been filed against concurrent judgments of the Courts below dismissing the suit of the plaintiff (since deceased now represented through his L.Rs-appellants) that he continued to be the mortgagee in possession of the land in dispute, and that the sale deed executed in favour of the defendants could not affect his rights of being mortgagee in possession, and further that now he had become owner by R.S.A No. 562 of 2008 (O&M) ::2:: efflux of time. Both the Courts on fact found that the land in dispute was redeemed by the mortgagors. The following questions have been proposed :- “ i) Whether the learned Courts below have not committed an error while appreciating and reading the evidence on record ? ii) Whether the documents Ex.D-4, Ex.D-5 and Ex.D- 6 have not been misread by the learned Courts below ?” Counsel for the appellants has taken me through the documents but has not been able to persuade me that the documents have been misread. Consequently, holding the questions proposed against the appellants, this appeal is dismissed with, however, no order as to costs. As the main appeal has since been dismissed, all the pending civil miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) November 03, 2009. JUDGE `kk'