IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO.6172 (SS) OF 2001 (Old No. 31836/2000) Ram Kishan Singh, S/o Sri Chet Ram, R/o Sarif Nagar, Post Khas, District-Moradabad. ………………petitioner. Versus 1. District Inspector of Schools, Nainital/Udham Singh Nagar. 2. Principal Rajkiya Inter College, Haripura Harsan Bajpur, Nainital. …………….Respondents. Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Sri K.N. Joshi Advocate for the petitioner and Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to release the pay-scale calculating the previous service of the petitioner and fix in pay-scale from C.T. Grade to L.T. Grade upto 1400-2300. The petitioner has confined his prayer for disposal of his representation dated 20.02.1998. 3. Briefly stated, accordingly to the case of the petitioner, he has worked as Assistant Teacher in Prathamic School Midanapur upto 19.04.1985, thereafter he was appointed as Assistant Teacher in Parishadya Junior High 2 Schookl in pay-scale of C.T. Grade 450-720 which has been revised in the year, 1986 up to 1350-2070. 4. The petitioner after receiving no objection certificate from Basic Shiksha Adhikari, approached in Government College at Kumaun Division in C.T. Grade in pay scale from 1350-2070. 5- Departmental Selection Committee after calculating the previous service of the petitioner from 03.12.1981 has appointed the petitioner on abovenoted pay- scale. 6. The grievance of the petitioner is that when he has been posted at Junior High School Barra Khera on 10.09.1991, his original pay-scale Rs. 1500 per month and since 19.04.1985 to 19.04.1995, he has completed ten years of service, and now he is entitled for the L.T. Grade from 1400 to 2300 according to the government policy, but he is not being given the same. 7. Regarding his grievances, the petitioner has made a representation on 21.11.1998, but the same has not been considered by the respondent concerned. 8. In view of the above, the authority concerned is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 21.11.1998 within a period of three months from the date of production of the certified copy of the order after considering the recommendation of the Principal (Annexure No. 6 to the writ petition). 3 9. Subject to aforesaid, writ petition is disposed of along with all the pending applications. No order as to costs. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) 22.08.2006 Rathour