IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2011 / 20TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 21858 of 2011(F) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. ROJAN TOM, S/O.M.J.THOMAS, AGED 23 YEARS, MEEMBANAL HOUSE, KANJIKUZHY P.O. IDUKKI, PIN 685600. 2. SANDEEP BALAKRISHNAN, S/O.BALAKRISHANN, AGED 23 YEARS, PULARI, KARITHOTTA P.O., KIDANGANNOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689514. BY ADV. SRI.ANVER BASHEER RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,KOTTAYAM, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR,PIN 682001. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM, PIN 682001. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC., MG. UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 21858/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION OF ANSWER BOOKS OF REGULAR EXAMINATION OF CONTROL SYSTEM - II (7TH SEMESTER) DATED 29/04/2011 OF 1ST PETITIONER. P2: COPY OF THE RECEIPT EVIDENCING THE PAYMENT OF FEES FOR CONDUCTING THE REVALUATION OF DATED 29/04/2011 OF 1ST PETITIONER. P3: COPY OF APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION OF SUPPLEMENTATION EXAMINATION OF CONTROL SYSTEM - II (7TH SEMESTER) DATED 22/07/2011 OF 1ST PETITIONER. P4: COPY OF RECEIPT EVIDENCING THE PAYMENT OF FEES FOR CONDUCTING THE REVALUATION OF DATED 22/07/2011 OF 1ST PETITIONER. P5: COPY OF APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION OF ANSWER BOOKS OF 2ND PETITIONER CONTROL SYSTEM II (7TH SEMESTER) DATED 22/07/2011. P6: COPY OF THE RECEIPT EVIDENCING THE PAYMENT OF FEES FOR CONDUCTING THE REVALUATION OF THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 22/07/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 21858 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 11th day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result was declared, petitioners failed in the paper “Control System-II” of 7th semester. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp