1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.1114 OF 2008 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4014 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1114 OF 2008 The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay ...... Appellants. V/s Vallabhdas Amarsey Kotak & Anr. ....... Respondents. ------ Mr. R.A. Matandkar i/b S.H. Ujjainwalla & others for the appellants. None for the respondents. ------- CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 27th June, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants - Municipal Corporation. He submits that the respondents have been served. This matter was called out yesterday. However, none appeared on behalf of respondent No.1. Therefore, the matter was kept today. The learned Counsel for the Corporation submits that he has informed the learned Counsel Mr. Shah appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 yesterday that the matter is kept today for admission and for interim relief. However, neither the respondent No.1 nor his counsel is present in Court today. Hence, admit. 2 2. Interim order in terms of prayer clause (a) of the Civil Application. However, it is clarified that the interim injunction is granted pending the hearing and final disposal of the First Appeal and not Civil Application. Civil Application is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)