1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. RAJESWARAN CRL OP(MD) Nos.17460 and 17461 of 2011 J. SENGOLAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED IN BOTH THE CASES Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUVERUMPUR POLICE STATION, TRIHCY DISTRICT ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT IN BOTH THE CASES For Petitioner : M/S. B.JAMEELARASU Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, Additional Public Prosecutor ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner in both the petitions is an accused in C.C.Nos.240 and 241 of 2007 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.VI, Trichy and he apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Heard Mr.B.Jameel Arasu, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that due to the non appearance of the petitioner, Non-Bailable Warrants have been issued against the petitioner in both the cases and the same are pending and therefore, he has come forward with this petition. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that due to the non appearance of the petitioner in both the cases, Non-Bailable Warrants have been issued against the petitioner and the same are still pending. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in both the petitions. However, the petitioner is at liberty to surrender himself before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Trichy, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and to file an application for cancellation of Non-bailable Warrant and to file an affidavit of undertaking to the effect that he would appear before the Court concerned for every hearing and in the event of filing the said https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 application along with the affidavit of undertaking, the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Trichy, is directed to consider the bail applications and pass orders, on the same day, and in accordance with law. With the aforesaid direction, this Criminal Original Petitions are disposed of. sd/- 28/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, TRICHY. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TRICHY. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUVERUMPUR POLICE STATION, TRIHCY DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. + 2 CCS to M/S. B.JAMEELARASU Advocate SR.No.46152, 46153 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD)NoS.17460&17461 of 2011 Date :28/12/2011 RJ/29.12.11 2p/7c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/