IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.3519 OF 2003 PETITION NO.3519 OF 2003 PETITION NO.3519 OF 2003 Smt. Hinaben N. Rana...........Petitioner Vs. Union of India & Ors...........Respondents Mr. G.S. Godbole, for the Petitioner. Mr. R.M. Agarwal, for the Respondent No.1 and 2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & S.P. KUKDAY,JJ S.P. KUKDAY,JJ S.P. KUKDAY,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 11th February, 2005 : 11th February, 2005 : 11th February, 2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . On behalf of the respondents learned Counsel makes a statement that the petition is to challenge the appointment of Respondent No.4 to a post in the service of the Union territory of Daman and Diu and Nagar Haveli. Petitioner is also one of the applicants and he has not been selected. Once that be the case the petitioner has an alternative remedy by moving the Central Administrative Tribunal. In the light of that the present Writ Petition is not maintainable. It will be open to the petitioner to move the Central Administrative Tribunal. 2. On behalf of the Respondents learned Counsel makes a statement, which is accepted, that if the petitioner seeks condonation of delay, they will not oppose the same. The learned Tribunal to consider the same. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (S.P. (S.P. (S.P. KUKDAY, J.) KUKDAY, J.) KUKDAY, J.)