1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6524 OF 2009 Devidas Aadhar Paradhi ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents ..... Mr. Gajendra Jain h/f Mr. N.L. Chaudhari, advocate for the petitioner Mr. V.D. Godbharle, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 3 ..... CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATED: 1ST FEBRUARY, 2010 PER COURT:- 1 Heard counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.P. for respondents 1 to 3. 2 The principal grievance of the petitioner is that the proposal of the petitioner for being considered as permanent full time lecturer in English subject has not been considered and decided by respondent No.4 University since August, 2009. In other words, if the University decides the said representation/proposal, nothing would survive for 2 consideration in the present petition. If the decision of the University is adverse to the petitioner, it will be open to the petitioner to take recourse of such remedies as permissible in law. 3 Accordingly, we dispose of this petition with direction to respondent No.4 University to examine the proposal/representation of the petitioner on its own merits in accordance with law and finally dispose of the same expeditiously, preferably within six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The petitioner shall produce copy of this order before the Registrar of respondent No.4 University within two weeks from today. 4 Petition disposed of on the above terms. If the petitioner is still in service, he shall not be discontinued until final decision is taken by the respondent No.4 University, as aforesaid. ( S. S. SHINDE. J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.) rlj/