IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.3664 of 2009 ==================================================== JITENDRA KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ------- 2. 14.07.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. Learned Counsel for the petitioner invites attention of the Court to an order of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 1240-1241 of 2011. He very fairly acknowledges that the name of the petitioner does not figure in the 223 persons with regard to whom directions have been given by the Supreme Court for holding fresh examination. It is further very fairly acknowledged that notwithstanding pendency of the present writ application the petitioner had filed an I.A. application before the Supreme Court for inclusion of his name in the list of persons who may be permitted to appear in the fresh proposed examination. His I.A. application has been dismissed. In view of the aforesaid, this Court finds it difficult to concur with the submissions made on behalf of the writ petitioner that notwithstanding the same he still has a right to press the present writ application seeking re-evaluation of the marks and the consequent right to appear at the proposed examination by addition of his name to the list of 223 persons permitted by the Supreme Court. The writ application stands dismissed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)