IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20893 of 2011 Rajeev Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/- 19/07/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named accused in this complaint case being husband of the complainant has also filed an application under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, seeking restitution of conjugal rights. And to further, strengthen his intention, also ready to pay a sum of Rs. 1,000/- (One Thousand) per month by way of interim maintenance to the complainant, subject to any order on the point by the competent authority. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, subject to filing an application before the court below stating such intention as stated above in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the petitioner, namely, Rajeev Kumar, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1044 of 2010, Tr. No. 2686 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any 2 reasonable explanation or even on single default in payment, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)