IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2011 / 24TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 328 of 2011(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- ANEESH S, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.SUKUMARAN SHARADA MANDIRAM, BHARATHEEPURAM PO,KOLLAM 691330. BY ADVS. SRI.C.KHALID SRI.NASEEB ABDUL RAZAK SRI.T.P.SAJID SMT.P.VANDANA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. SRI.B.SATYASHEELAN AGED 60 YEARS, RETIRED ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KSEB BLUE MOUNT, PUKKULAM,PARAVOOR, KOLLAM 691 001. 2. SMT. RADHIKA RANI,AGED 45 YEARS W/O. SATYASHEELAN ,BLUE MOUNT, PUKKULAM,PARAVOOR, KOLLAM 691 001. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHIRAVOOR 691 516. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.VENUGOPALAN NAIR R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.C.M.KAMAPPU THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P(CRL) NO.328/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE PRINTED INVITATION FOR THE MARRIAGE ON 21.11.2010 AT SOUBHAGYA AUDITORIUM, NEDUNGOLAM, PARAVOOR. P2:- COPY OF THE MARRIAE CERTIFICATE DTD. 10.6.2011. P3:- COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BEFORE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARAVOOR ON 8.6.2011. P4 :- COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.20/11-12 DTD. 8.6.2011 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ----------------------------------- W.P(Crl.).No.328 OF 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 15th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,J. The alleged detenue is present before us. The petitioner as also his parents are present. We have interacted with the alleged detenue. She is found to be a person capable of taking decision by herself. She was married to the petitioner about 7 months ago. As of now, we are sure that she is not under illegal detention of her parents and she lives with them on her own free will. She indicates to us that as of now, he does not intend to go with the petitioner. We also attempted to prompt her to go for mediation. Interacting with her we feel that mediation may not be worthwhile at this point of time, for the couple should be open to such a negotiated approach, if possible. Hence, without expressing anything on merits of the legal rights of either the petitioner or the alleged detenue, we WPCR.328/11 2 record that the alleged detenue is not under illegal detention and the writ petition is accordingly closed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- K.SURENDRA MOHAN, Judge. kkb.20/7.