IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.609 of 2002 ================================================== Prabha Mandal, wife of Dr. Devi Dutta Mandal, resident of village- Arnama, P.S.-Lokaha, District- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Om Prakash Mandal @ Vakil Mandal. 3. Nand Kumar Mandal @ Keshur Mandal (Both sons of Ramphal Mandal, residents of village- Arnama, P.S.-Lokaha, District- Madhubani) .... .... Opposite Parties ================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ram Bilash Mahto, Adv. Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Adv. For the O.P. Nos.2 & 3 : Mr.Ashok Kumar Prasad, Adv. For the State : Mrs. I.B. Pandey, Addl.P.P. ================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL) Amaresh Kumar Lal, J. The informant petitioner has preferred this revision application against the order dated 29.04.2002 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Jhanjharpur by which the accused opposite party nos. 2 and 3 have been convicted under Sections 323, 341 and 447 of the I.P.C., but instead of sentencing them to any punishment, they have been released on admonition by giving benefit under Section 3 of the Probation of Patna High Court CR. REV. No.609 of 2002 dt.09-12-2011 2 Offenders Act. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the opposite parties and perused the impugned order. It appears that the accused opposite party nos. 2 and 3 have no criminal antecedent. I do not find any ground to deny the benefit to the accused under Section 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act, which has been granted to the accused. Considering the facts and circumstances, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. Patna High Court, Patna Dated, the 9th of December, 2011 N.A.F.R./V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)