IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4014 of 2010 1. RAM PRAVESH MAHTO & 2. PAGALI DEVI VS. STATE. ----------- 2 18.03.2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners who are father-in-law and mother-n-law of deceased apprehend their arrest in a case registered for offence under sections 304B/34 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they live below the poverty line as their names lie at serial no. 3 of BPL list of Baniapur Panchayat and husband of deceased is already in custody. Prayer for bail of petitioner no. 1 as above is refused with direction to surrender and seek regular bail within six weeks which would be disposed of on its merit without being prejudiced by this refusal order. If petitioner no.2 as above surrenders within six weeks from today, her bail petition would be disposed of preferably on the same day also taking into consideration that accused persons live below the poverty line, as such, making of demand of motorcycle and chain by them may not be probable. With the aforesaid observations, the petition for bail of petitioner no.2 is disposed of. Let this order passed in Baniapur Police Station case no. 96 of 2008 be faxed to the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra at the cost of petitioners. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)