1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2528 OF 2009 Sujeet Raghunath Shetty .. Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondents. Mr.Mukesh J.Pabari for the applicant. Mrs.S.D.Shinde A.P.P. for the State. Coram: D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 26TH June, 2009 P.C. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. By this application the applicant has prayed for reduction of surety amount from Rs.50,000/- to Rs.15,000/-. He was granted bail vide order dated 26.12.2008. The applicant could not avail the bail since he was not in a position to furnish P.R. Bond of Rs.50,000/- and surety bond in the like amount with one solvent surety. In this backdrop he has approached this court with the prayer for reduction of the bail amount. I have perused the order of bail and also the order dated 27.4.2009 passed by the Sessions court rejecting the applicant’s prayer for reduction of the bail amount. In my opinion, the following order shall 2 meet the ends of justice: The accused be released on bail on furnishing P.R.Bond of Rs.30,000/- and surety bond in the like amount with two local solvent sureties. With these observations the application is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)