1 Kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.540/2008 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1172/2008 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.539/2008 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1172/2008 Sujit Dilip Panchmuttal and others. ....Applicants (in both applications) V/s The State of Maharashtra and another. ....Respondents (in both applications) ............. Mr.Kuldeep Patil, Advocate for the Applicants. Ms.A.T.Javeri, APP for the State. Mr.Nitin P. Deshpande, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. ............. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. Dated :- 08th May, 2009 PC :- 1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. A case for condonation of delay and restoration is made out. The delay is condoned and Criminal Application No.1172/2008 is restored to the file. The applications are disposed of. JUDGE 2 Kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1172/2008 Sujit Dilip Panchmuttal and others. ....Applicants V/s The State of Maharashtra and another. ....Respondents ............. Mr.Kuldeep Patil, Advocate for the Applicants. Ms.A.T.Javeri, APP for the State. Mr.Nitin P. Deshpande, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. ............. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. Dated :- 08th May, 2009 PC :- 1 The learned counsel appearing for the Applicants does not dispute that in the companion matter this Court did not entertain the application for quashing, with a liberty to the Applicants to file revision application and accordingly, revision application has been filed in the companion matter. 2 In view of this factual position, the application is not entertained with a liberty to the Applicants to file criminal revision application. If such application is filed, the concerned Court is bound to take note of the fact that this application was filed on 11.04.2008 and the same remained pending in this Court till today. All contentions on merits are kept open. JUDGE