^' / HIOHGOURTOPGWIAmSGARHAT'BltASPUR DryiSIQNBENCH Coram APPLICANTS: PLAINTIFFS RESPONDENT: DEFENDANT HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEVGUPTA.C.J. & HON'BLESHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA.J. M.G.C.No.238of200S 1. Smt. Malti Devi, aged 58 years, w/o Shri Madan Chand Keshari 2. K^mlesh Kumar K^hari, aged 38 years. 3. Dinesh Kumar Keshari, eged 34 yeare. No. 2 and 3, s/o Shri Madan Chand Keshari, r/o Deviganj Road, Ambikapur, Distt - Surguja (C.G.) Versus Shri Madan Chand Kesarl, aged 60 years, s/o Shri Ramdayai, r/o Deviganj Road, Ambikapur, Distt - Surguja APPLICATION UNDERORDER 39 RULE 2.A OF THE CODE OF CSVIL PROCB3URE 1998 Present: Shri Anurag Dayal Shrivastava, leamed counsel for the petitioners. O RD E R ?th (26tn September, 2008) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: Leamed counsel for the petitioners is heard on admisston, 2) The petitioners have filed this petition under Oreter 39 Rule 2-A of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking the initiation of proceedings against the respondent for the alleged violation of interim order dated 02.08.2001 passed in M.A. No.448/2001. ;:II.T l!ii'''';!i;i^f'Ki;KI'R)>itl^B^^liK;: sSS^S^:^., €^. 9' &>.• "" i' l """^^ ^ 1 1^ J.J '%£: •"•SS- 3) Shri Anurag Dayal Shrivastava., leamed counset for the petitioners fairiy and frankly submltted that petitionere' appeal M.A. No.448/2001 wherein the interim order dated 02.08.2001 was passed stands dismissed on meritsvide order dated 08.07.20(K. 4) In this view of the matter, we are of the opinion that no actton against the respondent, now, is warranted. 5) The petition, therefore, fails and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ff—^. (iia ^