IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 1329 of 2011 Decided on: April 11, 2011. Pawan Kumar & ors Vrs. State of H.P. & ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. T.S.Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners are aggrieved since the promotion granted by the second respondent to them to be in the field to gain experience without any honorarium or remuneration has been cancelled. According to the petitioners, they are duly qualified to be appointed as Pump Operators. However, after obtaining the qualification, they did not have any opportunity to gain experience and hence they approached the second respondent, who in turn granted such promotion. Later, realizing that there is no such provision for engaging the people for training, the training was cancelled. According to the petitioners, they do not want any stipend or any honorarium and they will not also claim any benefit out of such experience in service. But, with all such good intents also, the second respondent could not have taken an independent decision. The decision should have been taken by the Government. Be that as it may. In view of the earnest and apparently bonafide submissions made by the petitioners, we are of the view that the first respondent should look into the matter. Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of as follows: In the event of the petitioners filing representation to the effect that they only want to have some field experience and they will not claim any stipend or honorarium, or for that matter any benefit out of that experience, the first respondent will look into the matter and take appropriate action in the light of the 2 submissions made by the petitioners, within six weeks from the date of production of the copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the representation either jointly or separately, by the petitioners. 2. The Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. April 11, 2011. ( Justice Sanjay Karol ), (karan) Judge.