^•^/3~V IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICMURE, CHHATISGARH AT BILASUR. WRITPETITIONNO 2-°>) 5—OF 2005 PETITIONER: RESPONDENT: </^/ w/ .^ ^ ,/ 1)LAKHITRAM, S'/O ANAND RAM PAL, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/0 SIMGA (VILL. & PO) RAIPUR DIST. C.G.STATE. o- VERSUS y1) STATE OF C.G. ' TRU,SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPT. DKS B.HAWAN, RA1PUR C.G.STATE. 2) PRESIDENT, /NAGAR PANCHAYAT, SIMGA, (Vill. & PO. RAIPUR DIST. C.G.STATE. ^/3) PRES1DENT SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE, SIMGA,(VILL. & PO) RAPUR DtST C.G.STATE. ^IT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22:6/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF rfl^)IA FOR_ ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT (S) / ORDER (S) / li RECTION (S), ETC H1GH COURT OF GHHAmSQARH AT BLASPUR WRIT PETmON N0.2915 of 2005 Petitioner Versus Respondent Lakhtt Ram Stete of CMiatUsgarh & others WRn" PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226S27 0{- THE GON'STnUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. /^nihotri, J.) ^ Present:- Shri K.R. Nair, Advocate fdr tfie petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dsputy Caovernmant Advocate for the State. Shri Virendra Sharma, Advocate forthe respondent No. 2. Arun ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 9** Day <rf Apri!, 201 Q} 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitiorwr, on instructions, submits that with the passage of time the petition has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as havjng become infructuous. Consequently M.(W)P. No. 2450/2005 is aiso dismissed. i §(j/_ . Satish K. Agnihotri Judge