IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9153 of 2010 1. TUNNA CHOUDHARY S/O BHIKHARI CHOUDHARY R/O VILL.- MAJHAULI, P.S.- VAISHALI SADAR, DISTT.- VAISHALI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. ----------- 04. 29.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that it is a case of bank dacoity and the petitioner confessed his guilt whereafter two persons named by the petitioner were put on Test Identification Parade and identified and on his statement the motor-cycle which was used in dacoity was recovered from the house of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it in view of the serious nature of the offence. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)