pivlsion Bench IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR l1 APPLICANTS (Claiinants) ^ -^ ./•'"^' ^' ^' v^ ,-x ./• /^ y y^ ^ na.c.c. No. ^5 / 2011 : 1. Smt Nathiya bai W/o Late Shri Jagannath Prasad Kumbhkar, aged about 45 years, Occupation Household. • 2. Ku. Leela Kumbhkar D/o Late Shri Jagannath Prasad Kumbhkar, Aged about25y years, Occupation Student, 3. Jogendra Prasad Kumbhkar S/o Late Shri Jagannath Prasad Kurabhkar, aged about 23 years, 4. Jamuna Prasad Kumbhkar S/o Late Shri Jagannath Prasad Kumbhkar, aged about 21 years, Occupation Student. 5. Mohan Kumbhkar S/o Late Shri Jagannath Prasad Kunibhkar, aged about 18 years, Occupation Student, 6. Ku. Swati Kumbhkar D/o Late Shri Jagannath Prasad Kumbhkar, aged about 11 years, Occupation Student, through Mother and natural guardian Smt Nathiya Bai All permanent R/o Mohalla Kedarpur, Ring Road, Town Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS (Non applicants) : 1. M/ s Chhabra Bus Services Through Partner, Mahendra Singh Chhabra S/o Santosh Singh, aged about 45 years, Occupation Bus Business, R/o Ring Road, Namna In front of the Tank, At and post Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) (QWNER) 2-,- Bholaram S/o Raman Gond, aged about 50 years, Occupation Driver, (Bus Driver) Permanent R/o Ambikapur, Near Village Raghavpuri, at/post/P.S./ Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) (DRIVER) 3. Mandal Prabandhak, New India Insurance Company, Transport Nagar, Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) (INSURER) $ APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF M.A. N0.646/2001 ^^Al'isu'lOf _anJ— ^ KIGH COURT OP CHKATTISSAKK AT S1LASFVS. Divlsion Beaeh Kott'ble Sbfi I.M. Quddusi & Hoa'ble SStri G. aihthajnddin, JJ. M.C.C, KG. 679 OF 2011 APFLiCAHTS/' {ClEiiiaants) NON-APFLICAHTS Siut. Na'iliiva'Bai aiid OLUCI'S. Versas M/s CIihabra Bus Seivice an.d oftiers. APPLiCATiOK FOR RESTORATiOK OF M.A. N0. 646/2001 Kesent; Shrl Shakti Raj Siaha, couiisel for the applicauts. ORAL ORDER (Passed oa 30th day of Septexnber, 201 Ij Pe»I.M. Quddusi, J. Heard on I.A. No.Ol, appUcatiou for coiidoaation ofdelay 1& fauigtheM.C.C. 2. On due consldeiation of the grouads ineauoned lu tlie application, we are satisfied fhat the applicauts have succeeded ia explaining fhe cause of delay in filing the M.C.C. Therefore, fiie application is aUowed aud fhe delay caused in filing the M.C.C. Is hexcby coudoned. 3. Heai-d on M.C.C. 4. The applicaats have filed this applicatioii fpr lestofation of M.A. No. 646/2001 as fhe sanic has beeu disiuissed for waut of prosecutioa vJde order dated 04-05-2011. 5. For the reasons stated 111 the applicatioa for restoratioii, we are of the opirdon fhat fhe cause shown 1s satisfactoiy aad therefone, M.C.C. is aUowea. Ox-der dated 04-05-2011 dismissiug ftie M.A. No. 64G/2001 for want of pi'osecution is re-caUed, and M.A. No. 646/2001 is du'ectcd to be restored to its origiaal iiuinber. G. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sd/- G. Minhajuddin Judge