IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.8470 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 12, 2011. Simarjit Kaur and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.J.S.Puri, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.J.S.Puri, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioners impugns the action of the respondents whereby after re-fixing their pay, the consequential recovery is sought to be effected. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involved in this case stands settled by a decision dated 7.4.2010 rendered by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.6344 of 2010 (Jagjit Singh and others versus State of Punjab and others). CWP No.8470 of 2011 [2] The writ petition is accordingly allowed in terms of the afore- stated decision of this Court in Jagjit Singh and others' case (supra). Dasti. May 12, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE