-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.385 OF 2003 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6785 OF 2002 Dr.Sitaram B.Dhande ...Petitioner Vs. Shri.S.P.S.Jain and Anr. ....Respondents .... Smt.S.D.Gulhane for Petitioner .... CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. DATE : JANUARY 25,2005 DATE : JANUARY 25,2005 DATE : JANUARY 25,2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. As noted by this Court in W.P.No. 6785 of 2002 the respondents were required to decide the representation submitted by the present petitioner pursuant to the directions issued by the Central Administrative Tribunal and the said representation has been decided by the Central Railways as per the communication dated 23.1.2003 and hence, there is no case of contempt made out within a meaning of Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act,1971. As rightly held by this Court in Contempt Petition No. 87 of 2004 the directions to decide the representation do not mean the directions to decide the representation favourably. 2. Contempt Petition is rejected, summarily. -2- [ B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. ]