IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.20518-M of 2009 Date of Decision:12.1.2011 Dalbir Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. Anil Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of orders dated 24.8.2006,1.4.2008 and 6.7.2009 whereby accused Surjit Singh has been declared as a proclaimed offender; his property has been attached and the objections filed by the petitioner against the attachment have been dismissed. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 states that since the accused Surjit Singh has duly appeared before the trial Court, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 12.1.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE