IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 242 of 2011 Decided on: 18.07.2011 Chuni Lal …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & another …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate General. Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) Both the Courts below have come to concurrent finding of facts that no prima facie case is made out in favour of the petitioner, since he has failed to place on record any document to show that he was alloted land in question. This concurrent finding of facts cannot be interfered in proceedings under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 1 Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes. -: 2 :- 2. Therefore, I find no merit in the petition, which is accordingly rejected. No order as to costs. (Deepak Gupta) Judge July 18, 2011 (rajni)