1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application No.5631 of 2004 In Writ Petition No.2366 of 2003 (Agricultural Product Market Committee, Brahmapuri v. The State of Maharashtra and others) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Shri R.J. Kankale, Advocate for Applicant/Petitioner. Shri K.S. Dhote, AGP for Respondents. CORAM : R.C. Chavan, J. DATE : 1st February, 2008 1. The petitioner has filed this application for a direction to the respondents to refund the balance of Rs.1,62,928.50, which amount the Tahsildar had received for being made over to the petitioner-APMC towards market and supervision fees under the Public Distribution Scheme. 2. The respondents have not filed any reply to this application. The petitioner has appended to this application a copy of letter by the Tahsildar to the Collector seeking guidance in respect of the balance amount, which is required to be paid to the petitioner. 3. The learned AGP for the respondents submitted that if the respondents are directed to take a decision on the entitlement of the petitioner in respect of the balance amount to be paid to the petitioner within four weeks, it may serve the purpose. 4. The respondents are directed to take a decision on the entitlement 2 of the petitioner in respect of the balance amount to be paid to the petitioner within four weeks. 5. The civil application is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE pdl