IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SMT.JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT APPEAL(SR) NO : 19310 of 2005 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 18/08/2004 in WP.NO:8149 OF 2003 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1. The APSRTC., rep.by its Managing Director Musheerabad, Hyderabad 2. The APSRTC., rep.by its Regional Manager Prakasam Region, Ongole Prakasam District 3. The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Kanigiri Depot Prakasam District .....APPELLANTS AND 1. V.Mastan Rao, E-500208, Conductor Bhaskar Rao R/o.Sudavaripalem, Chilakaluripet Guntur District 2. M.Madhusudhan Rao, Conductor R/o.Koppal, Ongole Mandal Prakasam District 3. G.Subbaiah, S/o.Raghavaiah, Conductor R/o.Kanigiri Prakasam District (All are working as Conductors at Kanigiri Depot) .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants : MR.R.MANMADHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.M.RAVINDRANATH REDDY The Court at the stage of admission, made the following : JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Smt.Justice T.Meena Kumari) Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned counsel for the respondents and perused the impugned order. The learned single Judge disposed of the writ petition relying upon the Judgment of the Supreme Court in DIVISIONAL MANAGER, APSRTC AND OTHERS v P.LAKSHMOJI RAO. In view of the law laid down by the Apex Court, we do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the learned single Judge. The Writ Appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs. (T.MEENA KUMARI, J) (L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J) Dt: 08.04.2005 bsv/lvl To 1. The Managing Director APSRTC., Musheerabad, Hyderabad 2 The Regional Manager ,APSRTC., Prakasam Region, Ongole Prakasam District 3. The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Kanigiri Depot Prakasam District 4. Two CD copies