WP(C) 4184/2008 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. R.S. GARG THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. BARUAH (R.S. Garg, C.J.) Heard Mr. A. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. None for the respondents though served. The petition is finally heard. After taking us through the orders passed by the learned Tribunal and Annexure-D, the call letter, it was submitted that a candidate was required to be not less than 18 years of age by 15th January, 2005 and more tha n 25 years of age by 25th April, 2005 with relaxation upto 3 (three) years in ca se of OBC, the respondent No.5, Smt. Alaka Saha, could not be appointed because from Annexure-H it would appear that her date of birth was 19-12-1971 and on the date of the application she was 34 years while from Annexure-F, the school cert ificate, it would appear that her date of birth was 28-08-1972 and if that is ta ken to be correct, then too in the year 2005 her age was 33 years. After going through these documents, we are of the consi dered opinion that the learned Tribunal was not justified in dismissing the peti tion in liminie at admission stage without notice to other side. We set aside t he order dated 01-09-2008 passed by the learned Tribunal in Original Application No.104/2008 and remand the matter back to the Tribunal with a request to restor e the same at its original number, admit the same and issue notices to all the r espondents. The present petitioner would also be allowed to carry out the corre ctions in the cause title to make the petition effective and fruitful. The peti tioner may appear before the learned Tribunal on 29th June, 2010 and shall file a copy of this order with the Tribunal enabling the Tribunal to know as to what is to be done. The petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to cost. The records received be immediately sent back with a cop y of this order.