( 1 ) IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.968 of 2005 M/s. V.M. Sancheti & Co. ...Appellants V/s. Mrs. Chandra S. Rathod ...Respondents Mr. Shriram S. Kulkarni for the Appellants Mr. D.B. Lonkar for Respondents CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 14th August, 2007 : 14th August, 2007 : 14th August, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. The parties have reached a compromise and accordingly entered into a consent term dated 14-8-2007 marked as ’X’, signed by both the parties and respective Advocates. There is no dispute about the contents, identification and signatures of the respective parties. The Appellant is present in the Court. The learned Advocate appearing for the Respondents on instructions identify the signatures of the parties. Other side has no objection of any kind. ( 2 ) 2. One of the Appellant Vijay Kumar Sancheti is the Partner of respondent no.1 firm and is authorised to sign in this consent term. In view of this the second appeal is disposed of in terms of consent term and decree be drawn accordingly. 3. In view of this settlement of the matter and disposal of the second appeal, the civil application is disposed of as settled. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]