THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.1427 &1428 of 2005 COMMON ORDER: The first respondent filed O.S.No.65 of 2003 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Bapatla against the second respondent for the relief of rendition of accounts from June 2003 in respect of a Cinema Theatre said to have been held by them in common and for perpetual injunction against the third respondent to restrain him from renewing the licence. The petitioners filed I.A.No.1201 of 2004 with a prayer to implead them as defendants and I.A.No.1200 of 2004 to reopen the suit for that purpose. They pleaded that they have purchased the undivided half share of the second respondent under a document, dated 08.04.2004, and in that view of the matter, they are proper and necessary parties. It was also alleged that the undivided share of the first respondent was purchased for a sum of Rs.9,50,000/- on 06.03.2000. The first respondent opposed the applications. Through a common order, dated 04.02.2005, the trial Court dismissed the applications. Hence, these two revisions. Smt.Jyothi Eswar Gogineni, the learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that in spite of her efforts to contact the petitioners, they did not respond and she reports no instructions. A perusal of the order under revisions discloses that the first respondent claimed relief against the second respondent for a limited period. In case the petitioners have any independent rights vis-à-vis the property, they can certainly file suits and work out their remedies. The trial Court recorded a specific finding to the effect that the petitioners are neither necessary nor proper parties to the suit. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the order under revisions. Further, while admitting the revisions on 21.03.2005, this Court did not grant any interim order. The suit may have progressed to a substantial extent, if not already disposed of. No relief can be granted at this stage. Hence, the civil revision petitions are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:24.08.2009 kdl