(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1400 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1400 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1400 OF 2005 First Global Sotckbroking P. Ltd. and others ...Petitioners Versus Joseph George, Enforcement Officer and others ...Respondents ..... Mr. Vishal S. Khanavkar & Kedar B. Dighe, Advocate for Petitioners Mr. J.C. Satpute, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Rajesh More, A.P.P. for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 5TH JULY, 2005 DATED: 5TH JULY, 2005 DATED: 5TH JULY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard both sides. 2. The learned advocate for the petitioners states that the petitioners had preferred an application for discharge before the trial Court in Criminal Complaint No. C.C. 1587/S/2002. The said case is pending before the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Esplanade, Mumbai. 3. It is stated that the application for discharge has been preferred on 9.3.2004, however, the said (-2-) application has not been decided till today. Mr. Satpute, the learned advocate for the respondent No.1 i.e. Enforcement Directorate, Mumbai, has stated that they have filed necessary replies in the said discharge application and now the matter is posted on 13.7.2005 for arguments. 4. Looking to this fact, I am inclined to grant prayer of the petitioner for expediting the disposal of the said discharge application. In view of the above, the learned Magistrate shall dispose of the said discharge application as far as possible by 29.8.2005. 5. Writ petition is disposed of. *****