IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 6029/2008 Decided on:28.6.2010 _____________________________________________ Gambhir Chand Sood. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. D. Dadwal, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. P.L. Sharma, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy. A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Ashwani Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.4. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). It is represented by the learned counsel for the parties that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered as per the principles laid down by the erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in the judgment rendered in OA (D) 183/1997, titled Sansar Chand Sood and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 31.10.2001. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 Consequently, the present petition is allowed. Respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner on the basis of the principles laid down in the judgment citied hereinabove. Needful be done within a period of six weeks after the production of the certified copy of this judgment. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 28.6.2010 *awasthi*