SINGLE BENCH ® H AT BILASPUR $N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAR WRIT PETITION (5) NO..§H. :§./2010 liEIITIONER (X Ku. Jyoti Patel D/o. LaTe Panchmm Pu’reL aged ubouT 21 years, R/o. Villagiez Ww’gm P.$. Pusour', DistricT—kaigarh J\r» (C.G.) VERSUS S1'uTe of Chhatfisgar‘h, Through : The Manfralaya, D.K.S.Bhcwan, Raipur (C.G.). SuperinTendenT of Police, Roigar‘h, District Raigar‘h (C.G.), Station House Officer, Police Station Sarangarh, Tohsil sarongor'h, District Roigorh (C.G.). §3_E$PONDENT$ ‘5 - (1 1. Secretary, Home Deparfmenf, v I WRIT PETITION UNDER ~ARTICLE" 226 OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF I_NDIA . - . MLyM-w ‘0 mm mm (Wu) mmmm ammm Katmai-ham *mm Tumane SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Sihrivastava, J. 1 6-07-201o Shri R. S‘ Patel, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, Pane! Lawyer fo ‘ the State. Heard. Grievance of the petitioner as set out in the petition is that after death of petitioner’s father Panch Patei, who was working as Constable, ‘the petitioner has made an application for compassionate appointment on attaining the age of ajority in the year 2008, on 02-02- '2009 followed by reminder dated r 03—12a2009, however, the said application has not been decided so . A notice for demand of justice was also sent to the respondents N. & 3' on 25-02-2010 (Annexure P- 4), but no decision has been taken so ar. Taking into consideration the n ture of grievance, it is directed that titioner claiming compassionate appointment shall be .considered by *e respondent authority consistent with the relevant and available policy fcompassionate appointment and the decision shall be taken on the ame within an outer limit of four the representation made by the I Sd/— ti Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge r m o e