(3/? } ‘az/g IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 1CHEATTISGAgg 1 w.P. (S) No.6022/ 2008 Petitioner z. Rajkumar Dhruv, / S/o Lt. Shri P. R. Dhruv, Aged about 45 years, Deputy Range Forest Officer, Ondh Circle, Dhawalpur Range, East Raipur Forest Division, R/o Near Boys Higher Secondary School, Gariyabandh, District- Raipur(CG) Versus Resgondents / 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Forest Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Dist; Raipur— (C.G.) 2. Election Commission Of India through its Secretary, Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road,- New Delhi -— l 10001 3. ChiefElectoral Officer, Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Block, Mantralaya Premises, Raipur, Dist: Raipur- (C.G.) Braj Kishore Dwivedi, Deputy Range Forest Officer, Chura Range, East .Raipur Forest Division, , District-Raipur (CG) Qg‘ eQ dax‘e‘p Kagevawmr F 9‘ ?w PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 or THE ONSTITUTION OF INDIA l) Particulars of getitioners: As mentioned in the cause title above. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (S! No. 6022 of 2008 QQ?%\9Q\9% Petitioner Rajkumar Dhruv Versus Respondent State of Chhattisgarh 8b others WRIT PE’I‘I’I‘ON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shn' Kashif Shakeel, Advocate for the petitioner. Shn‘ M. P. S. Bhatia, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondent Q No.1. o R D E R (Oral; (Passed on this 17‘1‘ day of September, 2009) Heard. 1. Learned counsel appean'ng for the petitioner submits that Without passing any transfer order in (respect of the petitioner, the respondent No.4 has been transferred to the place of posting of the petitioner, vide order dated 26.9.2008 (Annexure PI 1). 2. Learned counsel appean'ng for the respondent No.1 referred to the document dated 16.2.2009 (Annexure R] 1) and submits that at present the petitioner is posted in Dhawalpur Range at 0ndh. Be that as it may, in the event, if no transfer order has been passed in respect of the petitioner, there is no question of :handing over the charge to the respondent No.4 or posting the petitioner somewhere else. 4. In View of the foregoing, nothing survives in this matter. The petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. No order asto costs. sal- . t Satish K Agnihm“ Judge Thakur