IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32658 of 2010 SUJAY KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 29.9.2010. Heard. Having regard to the findings earlier recorded in respect of participation of the petitioner, this Court is still not inclined to direct the release of the petitioner on bail, specially keeping in mind the report of the learned trial Judge who has fixed a time frame of six months for concluding the trial. It further appears from the report that he has written a letter to the Superintendent of Police, Munger for production of eight witnesses including the investigating officer of the case before him for their evidence. The court expects the Superintendent of Police, Munger that he will issue a proper order to the officer- in-charge of Jamalpur P.S.case No.140 of 2007 to produce the witnesses cited in the chargesheet on day to day basis so that the trial Judge who has fixed a time frame to conclude the trial amidst that time limit. The court expects that the trial Judge shall deliver the judgement within that time frame which shall be counted from the day he receives the copy of the present order on account of being transmitted by the office of the Court or on account of being produced by the petitioner before him whichever could be earlier. In case, the trial is not concluded then the petitioner shall have the liberty to approach this court after expiry of the time referred above in connection with S.C.No.637 of 2008 pending in the Court of A.D.J., Ist, Munger. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)