1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS and Registrar’s Orders. CP/2/2009 PRAKASH V/S THE STATE 1. Heard Shri Pramod Gaikwad, learned Advocate h/f Shri A.G.Talhar and Shri Daund, learned AGP for respondent No.1. 2. I have considered the submissions and perused the order in Writ Petition No. 116/2007, dated 3.8.2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out Exhibit "E" i.e. a letter addressed to the Principal of Mulji Jetha College under the signature of the Deputy Director. I have also considered the communication Exhibit "F" so also other communications on record, as pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Learned Division while passing the order in the Writ Petition had directed respondent No.2 therein to decide the proposal in accordance with law, within eight weeks. Learned AGP points out the communication Exhibit "E" dt.12.5.2008 and states that the direction has been obeyed and followed by the officer of respondent No.1 State. 4. In my view no case for issuance of notice under sub-rule (1) of Rule 8 of the Contempt of Courts (Bombay High Court) Rules 1994 has been made out. The petition sans merits and deserves to be dismissed. 5. In the result, Contempt Petition stands dismissed. No order as to costs. Dt.17.7.2009 (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.) akl