-•^ '-\y HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. ADpeilant M.A.C.No. 1184/2007 Ashok Thakur, S/o Shri Gulab Thakur, aged about 48 years, R/o Infront of Swarup Talta'es, Deepak Nagar, P.S. Durg, Tahsil & Distt. Durg (CG) . ' Respondents 1. Versus Guijar Singh, S/o Sukhvinder Singh Sikh, aged about 25 years, R/o Aamdi Ward, Santara Badi, P.S. Mohan Nagar, Durg, Tahsil & District Durg(CG) | 2. 3. Smt Iswari Bai, 411, B.S.B. Colony, Kanchipura, Ramdaspeth, Nagpur (M.S.) j 2A Ramesh Sharma, S/o Ramswarup Sharma, Near Lajxminarayan Mandir, Polsai Para, Durgj (CG) The National Jrtsurance Co. Ltd. Through its Dvisional Manager, Aakash Ganga, S'upela, Bhilai, Tahsil & DEstrict Durg (Cp) MiscellaneousapDeaf under Section 173 ofthe Motor Vehicles Act. 1988. Present: Shri P.R. Patankar, counsel for the appeiiant. ORALORDER (Passed on 11.03.2008) Heard onadmissEon. (2) In this appea! for enhancement of compensation, the appellant is aggrieved by the award dated 30/4/2007 passed by the VIIIth Additional Motor Accidents Ciaims Tribunai (FTC) (henceforth the 'MACT') District Durg (CG) in claims case No.16/2007, whereby in an injury case, the MACT has awarded compensation of Rs.68,800/-. (3) Learned counse! for the appeilant submitted that the compensation awarded by the MACT has been deposited and recfeived by the claimants. X, .^ Pnya (4) The oniy point urged by the iearned counsel for the appeilant in this appeai is that the compensation awarded by the MACT is on the lower side. (5) Having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the appeilant, I have perused the impugned award. The claimant'Sad sustained multiple fractures i.e. inthe 3 , 4t, 5t and 6th ribs. It is not disputed that the claimant did not suffer any permanent disability due to the accident and that no medicai evidencejwas adduced. The EViACT has already awarded Rs.68,800/M as compensation along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of application till realization. (6) No ground for enhancement is made out in this appeal, which is accordingiydismissed. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge \^