1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.11.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1865 of 2011 and MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.1 of 2011 Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited through its Managing Director, Madurai Limited. .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Sundarajan 2.Lakshmi 3.Venkataraman 4.Minor Balasubramanian (Minor fourth respondent is represented by his father and next friend viz., first respondent) .. Respondents Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the petition and order dated 20.07.2011 passed in Execution Petition No.25 of 2011 in M.C.O.P.No.68 of 2009 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gokul For Respondents : Mr.K.Kumaravel ORDER The order of attachment passed in Execution Petition No.25 of 2011 in M.C.O.P.No.68 of 2009 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/ Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram is being challenged in the present Civil Revision Petition. 2. The respondents herein as petitioners have filed M.C.O.P.No.68 of 2009 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal praying to pass an award for the amount mentioned therein, wherein an executable award has been passed and the same has been put into execution in Execution Petition No.25 of 2011. In Execution Petition No.25 of 2011, the bus belonging to the respondent therein has been attached on 08.08.2011. In order to raise the attachment, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner has contended that as per the order passed by this Court, the vehicle attached has already been released and under the said circumstances the attachment order is liable to be set aside. 4. It is seen from the records that in Miscellaneous Petition No.1 of 2011, this Court has granted interim stay on deposit of entire award amount together with interest. In Miscellaneous Petition No.2 of 2011, this Court has directed to release the bus, which has been attached. But in pursuance of the order passed in Miscellaneous Petition No.1 of 2011, no amount has been deposited by the revision petitioner in M.C.O.P.No.68 of 2009. Since no amount has been deposited in M.C.O.P.No.68 of 2009 as directed by this Court in Miscellaneous Petition No.1 of 2011, the attachment made in Execution Petition No.25 of 2011 cannot be raised and therefore the present Civil Revision Petition deserves to be dismissed. 5. In fine, this Civil Revision Petition deserves dismissal and accordingly is dismissed without costs and the order of attachment passed in Execution Petition No.25 of 2011 in M.C.O.P.No.68 of 2009 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram is confirmed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. smn Sd/- Assistant Registrar[T&P] /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/ Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram. +1 cc to Mr.K.Kumaravel, Advocate SR.No.41754. C.R.P(NPD)(MD)No.1865 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 Dated:25.11.2011 2P/3C RPB 19.12.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/