..^ " ! a-' N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUREATBILASPU& fC.G.) W.P. N01S50.../2003 PETITIONER Pradqgp Kumar Tiwari about38 years 5/0 Shri Radheraman Tiwari Sub Engiaeer Office ofthe Sub Divisional OfBcer, Department ofWater Resources A.B.C. Sub DivisionNo. 7 Sakti , District JanJgir-Champa (C.G.) RESPOIWENTS ^ ^^. sSW yey -y^y ^yf ^^ / '^/ VERSUS 1. 2. State ofChhattisgarh Through Secrefary Department ofWater Resources D.K. S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Union oflndia Through Direcfor Department ofBersonnel and Training Mimstry ofPersonnel, Public Grievances and Pension Govemment oflndia Roomno. 312, LokNayakBhawan 3riFloor,KhanMarket (StateReorganisation Cell) KhanMarket, NewDelhi- 110003 v . State ofMadhya Pradesh Through The Principal Secretary Department ofWater Resources Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan Bhopali(M.P.) TiriON TJNDER ^RTIGLES 226/227 iOE THECONiSTnJICTIO^ (3lE INDIA FOR ISSUANGE OF !A ROHKEJltE_wBlT^G!F !CMRTIol SRliJM]l XI-HC-22 ai^rw ^TWsn^r shtri^ ^ff^ti T^ -'lWldl, aitii'M'ls, i'lcll'yy aff^?r 'V^K t0.f.(00- (S-gp 'WV'yKW " ~ "" '"""V^ 2003 Ri'txiisr' aii^r wnw ^fef 11,7.2003 Petitioner(s) by Shri San4eeP Dubey, advocate. State by Shri Rajesh Pasi\ ShriV.V.S. Murthy, AddlJ •wifefN-WRif-ii •fs^>-cf^T': ^i'SiPaq 31)^1 ley, Goverament Advocate. Central'Govemmeat STandtng Counsel for the Union of IndiaJ Shri R.S. Jha, Deputy Ac^vocate General for the State of M-P. Heard- finally. Counsel for the petitio^iers submits that they tiave supplied the copies of the pejtitions with Annexures to the coLUisel for tlie State ofC.G./^t.P. aiid llxe Umoii of Iiidia. However, oiie extra ^apy be supplied and the acknowlcdgcmcnts thcrcof bc j)btaincd. Counsel for tUe petitione^(s) submits that these matters are squarely covered by thje decision of this Court in •W^.No.2353/2002 (MahesK^ and others) decided oa 28.4.| orders inay be paseed irrtKes^ tim.ar Tiwari Vsi Uruon of India 2003. They pray that similar cases olso as fhey are similar. iiav&approacl'K^lllistattedfyan It 1s stated that tl^ statemenfc is m^esatfc^^ after diie 'venfiGation. • ! "'::^%fc@'"1 • / - C^>uriscI"ioF^ siibfiiiKffiiaCtI-ie petitioners i it is iioCpossible tb decide tfae SS M f'^'^fe^ XI.HC-22 —^ 'TSf "i<l'illd<l, »Til'y<ie, facdtiy 3H^?T XR^; tlll^I t»>>1iqi '^1 200 ^^g' sii^s^r Vw^i 3n|piT SPIf^i •SfI^TTBiIWHfel •Z-- Oovemment within r.he tiine j.P.No.2353/2003 decided on ^tltloners are not in a posltion ^r, pray that theu- matters be considered. Accordtngly, relying on tijie statement made by counsel for the parties on the instru^dons received, as stated, the i-eprRsentations by t.he Cent.ra1 schedule as mentioned in W 28.4.22003. Coi.msel for the p| to dispute this. They, howev^ •^t<ffcT<ftl 4ffl^* ^ fe^ ^t^K ^ srf^f^ ^ti^i petitions are disposed of with| W.P.No.2353/02 (Miihesh Jtj the observations as made in ufnar Tiufttri Vs. Umon af Indla. cmd others) decided |»n 28.4.2003 subject to the modyication Chat the petition' detaUed representation raising] dociuueiiLs willmi leii days] Oovemment addressed to ;rs, if so desire, may make a their grievancesalongwifh the froiu loday to Uie CeiiU-al f.he Govemment of Tndia, Departruent of Personnel and '^rauung, Ministry of Personnel, Publlc Grlevances and Pensl(( Market, New DeUil (State Reo^ ns, LoknayakBhawan, Khan •ganisation CeU). Said copy of the representation duly suppc^-ted by aU relevant documents be also served on the conce|~ned Department'of both the States after obtaiiling the ac}aiowledgement and both the M's^'- 1 : ..- ';;:-:^:..:1 iSi^Ltgsnayforvvanl^tl^same 1)0 the CentralGovemmentwith their coiiLments a^ inforra.ation and coinplete etails in order to enablc thc Central aoverrmient to decide a 31 ISB [Tli;^^ BJ_ XI-HC-22 'S^ '^ITQIT^"^ eA^lTujr? TgT^fJJUJ SII^T^iT R-ii* sf^i sft*i -srffed ^o/' 3TT^?r "q^? t<l*iwi a>*iict) "^I, 200 ter^T' 3TI^ITRirWfrf?(T -3- rhe representation. Tt. is open seek such further informatior] tiKitn'tii i^mvS 4 feA <[<1^1< ^; aipOT 311^ to t.he Central GovemniRnt to froru the State Govemnients aad on' such requisiUon bejing made from tlie Central Govemment; the State Goverit(nents will supply the same. On ide, the Central Oovemnient ^am.e expeditiously by passtng fit and proper, in accordance such representation being m may consider and decide the appropriate orders as deemed| with law. In view of the above, t^.W-P and l.A., if any, stand disposed of. Certified copy as per rul^s. -^- Sd/- Eakhruddin Judge ^l [^f^ ^a^