CRP 407/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE T VAIPHEI Heard Mr MH Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 24.8.2010 pas sed by the learned Munsiff, Bilasipara in TS No 189/2007 rejecting the applicati on of the petitioner for examining unnamed official witnesses. The petitioner filed an application before the trial Court stating that the offi cial prosecution witnesses were dropped by the Court for want of prosecution and that unless these witnesses are examined, he would suffer irreparable loss. The trial Court on the basis of the said application held that some official witne sses have already been examined for three times by the petitioner; that the peti tion did not disclose as to why the petitioner did not take steps on 24.3.2010; that the petition did not reveal as to who were such official witnesses who were sought to be examined by him and that as the application was sketchy , the same stood rejected. I have no reason to disagree with the trial Court in rejecting the application o f the petitioner. The impugned order does not reveal any improper exercise of ju risdiction by the trial Court. Consequently, this revision petition has no merit and is accordingly, dismissed at the admission stage and without issuing notice to the respondents. No costs.