Civil Revision No. 3646 of 2007 (1) In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 3646 of 2007 (O&M) Vidya Wati and others ..... Petitioners vs Manohar Lal ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. S. K. Singla, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Hemant Saini, Advocate, for the respondent. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to the order dated 16.7.2007 passed by the learned court below whereby the respondent/plaintiff was permitted to lead evidence in rebuttal. Challenge was made on the ground that the plaintiff cannot be permitted to led evidence in rebuttal on the issue, the onus to prove of which is on the plaintiff. Learned counsel for the parties are agreed that the legal issue involved in the petition was referred to and considered by a Division Bench of this court in Civil Revision No. 1213 of 2005 Surjit Singh and others vs Jagtar Singh and others which now stands decided vide judgment reported as 2007 (1) RCR (Civil) 537. He further submitted that after the answer to the question of law referred to the Division Bench, the impugned order passed therein was set aside and the matter was remitted back to the learned court below to be decided in terms of the aforesaid judgment in Surjit Singh's case (supra). As authoritative enunciation of law laid down by a Division Bench of this court in Surjit Singh's case (supra) has not been considered by the learned court below, both the learned counsel are agreed that the impugned order may be set aside and the matter be remitted back to the learned court below to be dealt with in accordance with the law laid down in the aforesaid case. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 16.7.2007 passed by the learned court below is set aside and the matter is remitted back to be considered in accordance with law. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms. 10.3.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge