IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Misc.No.9744 of 2011 & Civil Writ Petition No.4093 of 2011 Sunil Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Anurag Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Civil Misc.No.9744 of 2011 Annexure P-7 taken on record. Application disposed of. Civil Writ Petition No.4093 of 2011 The petitioner, who is a Constable, seeks his adjustment in the Executive Cadre. Clearly there is no right of any employee to seek absorption in a particular form of service in the same department. Merely because some other employees were absorbed would not give any legal right to the petitioner to seek absorption on the ground of parity. The denial was also made in the year 2007. The petitioner has now approached this court. Since the petitioner does not have any right to seek absorption, it would not be appropriate to invoke writ jurisdiction of this court. Dismissed. July 28, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE