IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2011 / 21ST CHAITHRA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 2832 of 2011() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.347/2011 OF KADKKAL POLICE STATION CMP.1692/2011 of J.M.F.C.-II,KOTTARAKKARA .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED ---------------------------- 1. SANTHI, D/O.LEKSHMI, DOOR NO.10, AMMANCOVIL, SELAM, CHENNAI, TAMILNADU. 2. SUBHASHINI, D/O.LEKSHMI, DOOR NO.10, AMMANCOVIL, SELAM, CHENNAI, TAMILNADU. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.ARUN KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. .................................................... Bail Application No.2832 of 2011 ..................................................... Dated this the 11th day of April, 2011 ORDER Petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.347/2011 of Kadakkal Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 379 read with 34 IPC, seek their enlargement on bail. The petitioners were arrested on 14.03.2011. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioners and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioners are released on bail, they will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) sj