e<> ^ c^'^ !N THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (SINO.&^^%- /2010. PETITIONER: \.^--:. ^^ ^..^ «*"-••' .. •^- Ctn; Mahadev Rao Meshram, son of Late Barik Rao Meshram, aged about 53 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Boys Hostel, Seepat Road, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. versus Respondents \M^K/^- /y^~\'% 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary Tribal Welfare Departinent Ministiy, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhatdsgarh. 2. Coininissioner, Schedule Tribe and Schediile Caste Development, Chhattisgarh, Raipur. 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERfSl: /~\ '-HC—78 '7:si -^ww^, •a-^w\'£,F^w-vy. ^^..M^ll2..3.^.1ll6.... ail^r 'VR! (1pf33l^lEf) sn^i^ifyfiq? wn sn^v s»ii°t> wiTwafCTsn^i SB: Hoa'bleShri Maniadra Mohlan Shrivastava, J. '^Fite^? 'ETrq^f ff f^et' •d^s^R ^stRm 3ii^i fhe petitioner. for the State/respondeuts, on 6,7.2010 Shri K.S. Pawar, couiisel foii Shri Satish Gupta, Govt Ajivocate advaace copy. Heard. Leamed cottasel for fhe pejtitioner subinits fhat fhe petitioner is entifled to grant of regular jiay-scale fix>m fhe initial date of appointnient ia view of Circul^r dated 27.12.2008 issued by fhe Department ofScheduled Caste ^ Scheduled Tribe aad ia view oforder passed by fhe Madhya Prad4sh State Administeative Tribiinal, Jabalpur (for short 'the SAT^ in <^.A. No. 2745/89 (JWndhufcunt Yddv. and 56 others Vs. Stcrte ofSS.^. & ether^, wluch later on, attamed finality, as S.L.P. again.st fhe SEJine, was disinissed by the Supreine Court also. Learaed counsel | for the petitioner subinits fhat respondents inay be directed to c^nsider the case ofthe petitioner. On the other hand, learued) counsel for the respondents subnuts that if fhe petltioner claims bejnefit of Circular dated 27.12.2008, petitioner ought to have first a^proached fhe respondents, claiming such benefit. ./""' ^ !-%. \ ? v'^'"STf^fSC—7S ^ST '<4l<<l<n<<, ®Ti1y'is,'fsRTRiy ....^.^..3.2.^.1^..... 3TI^I'CR?T (1°ff^«l<it?) sn^rw K-i . ^is?T 5TT^?T ^i^tw Sinlia ?^IIWdft?I 311^1 2-- tie Taldng iato considcration and also takmg into considerati^n number of cases, pctitioner ^ Aufhorities, clairmng beneflt basejl gr^nted If fhe petitioner stauds on bv fhe SAT m Madhufcant Tasbi. by the Supreme Court ia Specia| order dated 3.1.1994, the qil<1^if1l 'iTFT^ ^ "fe'^ •?' '^sifinan^r submissioas made by the parties fhat orders have been passed ia Uberty to approach respondent- on Circular dated 27.12.2008. ^he same footuigs as per order passed (supra) and subsequently coiifinned leave Petition (CivU) No.6892/93 by inay be entifled to same reUef. petittoBjer Wifh the aforesaid obserjirations, tbe petition staads finatly disposed ofi'. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge .4