IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2006 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1928 WP(C).No. 30861 of 2006(Y) -------------------------- OS.55/2006 of PRL.M.C.,ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER: ------------ THANKAMMA, W/O.MADHAVAN, AGED 54 YEARS, VALAVUTHADATHIL, NEDUMKULANGARA MALA, KAKKANADU, ATHANI. BY ADV. SRI.PAUL K.VARGHESE RESPONDENTS: ------------- KARTHU, W/O.KODIAN, AGED 57 YEARS, NOW RESIDING AT VENGATTUTHARA, NEDUMKULANGARA MALA, KAKKANADU, ATHANI. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/11/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J ------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 30861 Of 2006 ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2006 J U D G M E N T The writ petitioner filed a suit and obtained an interlocutory order of injunction. That suit was dismissed for default, according to the plaintiff, without adverting sufficient opportunity to take steps to adduce evidence. He filed an application for restoration of that suit. That application also stands dismissed on 17.11.06. This writ petition is filed on 21.11.06 and is before me today seeking a direction to the court below to issue a certified copy of the order dated 17.11.06 and also with a prayer that this Court may issue a temporary injunction restraining respondents from dealing with the suit property. I am sure in my mind that no direction under article 227 needs to be issued on the aforesaid circumstances of the case. If an order is passed on 17.11.06 the party may be entitled to a copy thereof. Whatever haste the parties may show, the courts should also have reasonable time. I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition and issue any direction. This writ petition is dismissed. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. SJ W.P.(C). NO. 30861 Of 2006 2