THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.5241 of 2010 Dated:10.03.2010 Between: Plya Ramakrishna and another .. Petitioners And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.5241 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioners purchased land admeasuring Ac.0.30 cents each in Survey No.9/1 of Madhavadara Village in Visakhapatnam District, under an agreement of sale dated 26.04.1971 and are statedly in possession of the land. It appears that Bandaru Adinarayana – declarent and his heirs are owners of the total extent of land admeasuring Acs.02.95 cents in Survey No.9/1 (Old Survey No.42/C). B.Adinarayana filed a declaration under Section 6(1) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. He was declared surplus holder to an extent of 1.1124 hectares by Urban Land Ceiling Authority. The declarent was unsuccessful before the appellate authority. Against the appellate order, dated 24.01.2001, the declarent preferred W.P.No.12378 of 2001. The same was admitted. However, it appears, subsequently, the same was withdrawn, even though by that time, the petitioners herein were impleaded as party respondents. In the meanwhile, while the petitioners were contemplating the suit for specific performance of agreement of sale dated 26.04.1971, it is alleged that the officials from the office of the third respondent visited and tried to dispossess the petitioners. The petitioners contend that pending adjudication of the rights in the civil suit, if they are dispossessed, they would be put to hardship. Therefore, the instant Writ Petition is filed by the petitioners, seeking direction to the respondents not to dispossess them from their property in question. After getting instructions, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Urban Land Ceiling), submits that the officials of third respondent or Tahsildar never tried to interfere with the possession of the petitioners. The same is recorded. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 10.03.2010 KH