.n (L^ LBT^^ (1) IN THE fflGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBILASPURfC.G) W. P. (S) No. /2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS >\. "t. <" A^^" ^'t''l''^"^ \''~ XK^" ^tC.-\) ^i--v 1. 2. 3. 4. ^" Dilip Shukla S/o ShriVashishthNarayan Shukla,Age about 57 years, R/o Behiad Sagar Hotel, Imlipara, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Home Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Secretary, GeneralAdministration Department D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Police Superintendent Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) C.G. Infrastructure Development Corp. Through-Managing Director, CIDC, Shastri Chowk, Raipur (C.G.) WRTT PETmON UNDERAKHCLES 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA 1. Particulars ofthe Petitioner: As mentioned above in the cause title. 2. Particulars ofthe Respondents : As mentioned above in the cause title. 'r- lini ^ PETITI HtGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR ^A/RIT PETITION (S) No. 1681 of 2011 DilipShukta VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh & Others. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA Present: Shri S.P.Kale, Advocaie for the petitloner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate for the State. Shri Ratan Pusty, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. (Passed on 23th day of March, 2011) 5y this petition, the petitioner seeks a dlrectlon to the respondents, particularly the respondent No.4 to absorb the petitioner in service on the ground of being the employee of the erstwhile Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (for short "MPSRTC"). Further, the petitioner may be considered for absorption in the Department of Home on the post of Assistant Grade-111. The petitioner aiso prays for quashment of memo dated 1 3.09.2010, whereby the petitioner was dlrected to be superannuated w.e.f. 31.8.2011 (A.N.) Learned counsei appearing for the parties submtt that the issue with regard to absorption of the employees of erstwhile MPSRTC, came into consideration in the matter of A.K.Owivedi v. State of C.G. & Othsrs . This Court, after having considered a!l the facts, passed the order as under: "Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the policy of Absorption, the Rule of Absorption framed by the State Government in the matter of absorption of employees of erstwhile MPSRTC W.P.®No.4245 of 2)10, decided on 06.08.2010 //•^ \ f 'i :--i_SS3% 'si!h. '%>yf. Es^-. ~^~1ss^!f and further that large number of simiiarly situated employees have already been absorbed in various departments of the Government in implementation of the Absorption Poijcy and that the petitioner is going to retire on 31st August, 2010, it Is directed thaf the case of the petitioner for absorption shall be considered by the concemed respondent authorities, strtotly in accordance with the Ruies of Absorption framed by the respondent No.1 , as expeditiously as possible." 3. The ratio was further considered in O.P.Singh v. State of ChhatSsgarh & Others in W.P.(S) No.5521 of 2010, which was disposed of on 21.01.2011, relying on the order passed by this Court in A.K. Dwivedi (supra). 4. Having regard to the facts situation of the case, since the petitioner is going to retire on 31.08.2011, his ease may be considered at the earliest as possible. With regard to quashing of the order dated 31.08.2011, the petitioner does not press this prayer, in view of the declsion passed by this Court in A.K.Dwivedi (supra). 5. In view of foregoing, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to consider case of the petitioner for absorption, in accordance with the ruies of absorption and poticy of the State in terms of the order passed in A.K.Owivedi (supra). Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge ashok