1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.3101/2010 ( Smt. Vandana W/o Amrut Jagne -: versus :- State of Maharashtra, through Collector & others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri A.M. Quazi, Adv. for petitioner. Shri Sonare, A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 and 2. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JULY 15, 2010. Adv. Shri Quazi points out that the acknowledgment of Scrutiny Committee was received little late and hence was tried to be produced during scrutiny and was not accepted. Shri Sonare, A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 and 2, states that nomination paper was rejected as it was not accompanying necessary documents. The question whether petitioner wanted to produce the acknowledgment during scrutiny is a disputed question. In this situation, as elections are scheduled on 18/7/2010, I am not inclined to interfere in writ jurisdiction. With liberty to petitioner to take recourse to appropriate remedy before competent forum, writ petition is disposed of. JUDGE Tambaskar.