IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1932 SA.No. 212 of 1995(A) ------------------------------ ( O.S.NO. 251/1986 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, TALIPARAMBA IN A.S. NO.72/1990 OF SUB COURT OF PAYYANNUR) APPELLANT(S): ---------------------- 1. MOSANTHAKATH PUTHIYA PURAYIL KUTTIALI, S/O. KUNHI MOOSSAN, SREEKANDAPURAM AMSOM DESOM, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. VAZHAYIL IBRAHIM, S/O. KATHER, CHENGALAYI AMSOM, PARIPPAYI DESOM, KANNUR DISTRICT. 3. PUTHIYA PURAYIL USMAN, S/O. MOHAMMED, CHENGALAYI AMSOM, PARIPPAYI AMSOM, KANNUR DISTRICT. 4. KUNHIKANDEELAKATH KEELATH- * DIED PUTHIYAPURAYIL MOHAMMED KUNHI, S/O KUNHI MOOSAN, SREEKANDAPURAM AMSOM DESOM, KANNUR DISTRICT. * SUPPLEMENTAL APPELLANT 5 TO 11 IMPLEADED 5. WIDOW, KUNHIPATHUMMA, BEEBEERAKATH, SREEKANDAPURAM AMSOM DESOM, KANNUR DISTRICT. 6. HAMSAKUTTY OF -DO- -DO- 7. KUNHIPOCKER OF -DO- -DO- 8. SULEKHD OF -DO- -DO- 9. HAFSATH OF -DO- -DO- 10. NAZEEMA OF -DO- -DO- 11. ABDUL KHADER OF -DO- -DO- sts S.A.NO.212/1995 *SUPPLEMENTAL APPELLANTS 5 TO 11 ARE IMPLEADED * AS THE LRS OF THE DECEASED 4TH APPELLANT AS PER ORDER DATED 18/11/99 ON CMP 1851/99. BY SRI.T.P.KELU NAMBIAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE ADVS. SRI.P.G.RAJAGOPALAN SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR SMT.NARAYANI KUTTY CHETTUR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. KOMATH VALAPPIL PRABHAKARAN, S/O. THAMBAYI, CHENGALAYI AMSOM, PARIPPAYI DESOM, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. -DO- THAMBAYI, * DIED S/O. PARVATHI AMMA, OF -DO- -DO- * THE 2ND RESPONDENT DIED AND RESPONDENTS 1, 7,10,12 AND 13 ARE RECORDED AS HIS LHRS AS PER THE ORDRE DTD 15/10/2010 VIDE MEMO C.F.5111/2010. 3. -DO- KALLIANI, D/O. PARVATHI AMMA, OF -DO- -DO- 4. -DO- MADHAVI, D/O. PARVATHI AMMA, OF -DO- -DO- 5. -DO- JANAKI, D/O. PARVATHI AMMA, OF -DO- -DO- 6. -DO- SREEDHARAN, * CORRECTED S/O. JANAKI, OF -DO- -DO- * THE NAME OF THE 6TH RESPONDENT IS CORRECTED AS ' SURENDRAN' AS PER THE ORDER DTD 17/3/2008 IN I.A. 660/2008. 7. -DO- KARTHIYAYANI, D/O THAMBAYI, OF -DO- -DO- 8. -DO- SUJA, D/O KARTHIYAYANI, OF -DO- -DO- sts S.A.NO.212/1995 9. -DO- MURALI, S/O. KARTHIYAYANI, OF -DO- -DO- 10. -DO- DEVI, D/O THAMBAYI, OF -DO- -DO- 11. -DO- BIJU (MINOR) REPRESENTED BY MOTHER AND GUARDIAN, KOMATH VALAPPIL DEVI, OF -DO- -DO- 12. -DO- NARAYANAN, OF -DO- -DO- 13. -DO- JANARDHANAN , OF -DO- -DO- 14. -DO- KRISHNAN NAIR, S/O PARVATHI, MAYYIL AMSOM, PERUMACHIRI DESOM, KANNUR DISTRICT. 15. -DO- LAKSHMI, D/O PARVATHI, SREEKANDAPURAM AMSOM DESOM, KANNUR DISTRICT 16. -DO- SAROJINI, D/O KOMAH VALAPPIL LAKSHMI, OF -DO- -DO- 17. -DO- ROHINI, D/O. KOMATH VALAPPIL LAKSHMI, OF -DO- -DO- 18. -DO- PURUSHOTHAMAN, S/O KOMATH VALAPPIL LAKSHMI, OF -DO- -DO- 19. -DO- KUNHIKANNAN, S/O KOMATH VALAPPIL LAKSHMI, OF -DO- -DO- 20. -DO- NARAYANI, D/O PARVATHI, MAYYIL AMSOM, PERUMACHERI DESOM, KANNUR DISTRICT. 21. RAJAN, S/O. KOMATH VALAPPIL NARAYANI, OF -DO- -DO- sts S.A.NO.212/1995 22. PURUSHOTHAMAN, S/O KOMATH VALAPPIL NARAYANI, OF -DO- -DO- 23. SANTHOSH, S/O KOMATH VALAPPIL NARAYANI, OF -DO- -DO- 24. LATHA, D/O KOMATH VALAPPIL DEVI, OF -DO- -DO- 25. KAVINISSERI RAGHAVAN, S/O KANNAN, OF -DO- -DO- 26. ATHIYADATH KARTHIAYANI, D/O KUNHAMBU, CHENGALAYI AMSOM, PARIPPAYI DESOM, KANNUR DISTRICT. 27. KIZHAKAPURAYIL NARAYANI, W/O LATE AMBU KOMARAM, CHENGALAYI DESOM, PARIPPAYI DESOM, KANNUR DISTRICT. 28. KIZHAKA PURAYIL SUMA, D/O LATE AMBU KOMARAM, OF -DO- -DO- 29. VASHANTHA, D/O LATE AMBU KOMARAM, OF -DO- -DO- 30. KURUMANGALATH NARAYANAN, S/O LATE AMBU KOMARAM, OF -DO- -DO- R1 BY ADV. SRI. M.L. SAJEEV SRI.M.N.SANJITH R1 TO R5, R7 TO R18, 20,21, 23, 24 & 26 BY ADVS. SRI.D.KRISHNAPRASAD SRI.D.NARENDRANATH SRI.JOJI VARGHESE THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/11/2010, ALONG WITH SA NO. 214 OF 1995 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ----------------------------------------------- S.A.Nos.212 & 214 of 1995 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24h day of November, 2010 JUDGMENT No steps taken to implead the legal representatives of the deceased respondents and the appeals as against those respondents have abated. Since one among the suits is for partition, the abatement of appeals against the above respondents foreclose further proceedings. Appeals are, therefore, dismissed. Sd/- (S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN) JUDGE sk/- //true copy//