PBTITONBR Plaintiff RBSPONDENTS Defendants HIQH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (2271 No. 6372 OF 2011 Ayodhya Sirxgh, son of Late Nagma Smgh, aged about 68 years, Resident of Shyain Nagar Telibaiidha, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C. G.). VERBUS 1. Bhagwaa Thakur Ramchaadi-a Swami (Legal Person), Dudhadhari Math, Puraiii Basti Raipur, Distnct Raipur (C,G.), 2. CoUector, Raipur, Through the State of Chhattisgarh, District Raipur (C.G.). 3. Registrar, PublicTrust, G.E. Road Raipur, Distiict Raipur (C.G.). 4, Vijsy Manvati, son of Late Shri Malik Shah Marwah, Resideat of 41 Oni Vihar Coloay, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 5. Leeladhar Chaadrakar, aged about 44 years, son of Late Sarju Prasad Chaadrakar, Resident of House No. 308, New RajeHdra Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil aad Distdct Raipur (C.G.). 6. Krishna Kuniar Toinar, aged about 50 years, sou of Late Jaichaad Touiar, Resident of Khanij Nagar, VIP Road, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipm' (C.G.). WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLB 227 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF iNmA. (SB :Hoa?ble Bfc. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:-Shri V.K. Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sumit Jhanwar, P.L. for the State/respondents No. 2 & 3. Respondents No. 1 & 4to 6 not noticed. ORDBR Applicants (Passedon 09/11/2011) By fhis petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India petitioner has chaUenged tlie legaUty aad propriety of the order dated 1/7/2011 passed by 6A Civil Judge, Class-2, Raipur, (C.G.) ia civil suit No. 61A/2008 whereby Court below has allowed application filed on behalf of the opposite party for impleadmg aU trusty as necessary party, v\ --^ %, l ^Si^. j '^Ky -^- ^^ Order impiigned perused, Preseut petitiouer has filed suit against pubUc trust although iaitiaUy suit as framed was not xnaiEitamable but by filiag application on behalf of the opposite party for iaipleadiag aU trusty as parly now tlie suit is niamtaiaable before the tdal Court While aUowiag the application filed on behalfofthe respondents Court below has not conunitted any illegaUty requirmg aay interference in exercise of supervisoiy jurisdiction ia terras of under Article 227 of fhe Constitution of India, ConsequenUy, petition is Uable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed at the stage of adniission, No order as to costs. Intermx application staiids disposed of g^y^ T.P. Sharma Judge ^ ^