HIGH COURT OF CHHA’I‘TISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 2591 of200a . r PETITIONER I ; s.Jasmeet singh S/o is.Bh&pencka Singh Aged about 47 years, R/o Maha'veer Para, Dongargarh Disli. Rajnandgaon (C‘G.) ‘ nRSUS RESPONDENTS : l.' Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry ' of Finame, North Block New Delhi. 2. Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 3. Commissionar of Income Tax, New Central Revenue Building Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Income Tax Ofxcer, Ward - 2, ¥ajhaudgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. Agnihou'i, J. Present: Shri Neelabh Dubey, Advocate for the paitioner. Shri Amit Chaudhaxy, Advocate with Ms. Naushina Anin Ali, Advocate for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 08m day of September, 2008) Shri Neelabh Dubey, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the dispute with regard to refund of income tax, as claimed by the petitioner is pending consideration since 1997. 2. Shri Chaudhary, leamed counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the needful shall be done within a period of four weeks non: the date of receipt of a copy ofthe order. 3. Inéview of the clear and‘ categorical statement made by learned Shri Chaudhary, according to Shri Dubey: nothing survives in this matter. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. ./ i sei- E [‘ L Satish K. Agnihotriwr r p 5 Judge Hf