,,"|r-'!°".;t.t. "q;«k\ H!GH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT Bii-ASPUR Writ Petitson No.1574 of 20Q4 Petitioners —1. Kachra Bai Wd/o Kanhaiya, aged about 80 years. 2. Radhs Bai Wd/o Kanhaiya, aged about 60 years. 3. Tuisi Bai D/o Kanhsiy^, aged about 50 years. 4. Netram S;o Kanhaiya, aged about 25 years. 5. Chetram 3/o Kanhaiya, aged sbout 20 years. 6. Boudanand S/o Kanhaiya, aged sbsut 15years. Aii by casts Kumri, r/Q Rarnpur Ghunghutipara, Tehsi! Pall District Korba (CG). (Si.No.6 minor through naturai guardian mother Radha Bai, r/o Rampur Ghunghutipara, Teh.sii Paii District Korba (CG). Resoondenf! Ve/sus 1. Narsyan Singh S/o Kunjram, r/o Vlliage Rampur Ghunghutipara.Tehsi! Pa!i, District Korba (CG). 2. Ths State of Chhattisgarh, Through District Collector, Korba, TehsiS and District Korba (CG) 3. Board of Rsvsnue, througb its h4ember, Bilaspur, Tehsil and District Biiaspur (CG) OWrii Fetitton under Artteie 226/227 of the Constiiution of india) iV'ir.Sunii Sahu, counssi forthe petitsoners. Nsne presentfor respondent No.1. Fwr.Akhii Agrawal, Panei Lawysr for rsspondent No.2/State. (SB: Kon'bie Mr. T.P. Sharma, <;.) T z (20-9-2011) 1. By this writ petition.undsr Articie 225/227 of the Constitution of india ihe petitlonsrs havs challenged the isgsiity & propriety of the order dated 29.4.2004 passed by ihe Board of Revenue, Biiaspur, In Rsvsnue Rsvision No.82/A-23/2003-04, revsrsing the ordsr 9.7.2001 passsd by She Cs^iiector, Korba in Revenue Case No.51/23/98-99, affirming the order dated 21.5.99 passed by the Sub Divissonai Officer, Katghora in Revenue Case No.120-23/97-98, whereby the Sub Diwsionai Officer has dismisssd the appiication fiied by respondent No.1 under Ssctjon 170-B of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 Qn short 'Code'). 2. Aftsr some argumsnts, iearned counsei for ths pstitioner frankiy submits and sdmits thst without any inqu!", in terms of Section 170-B of the Code, any order of return of possession wouid not bs iegsiiy possibie, but the compstent authorifry' i.e. Sub Divisionai OfRcer has not maae any inquiry. 3. Considsring the orders of t'ne Coliector and ihe Board of Revsnue and ihe fact t'nat w'nils setting asids the order of ths Ccitector and aliovving the petition fiied by respondent No.1 the Board of Revenue hss not made any inqu!r/ !R terms of Seciion 170-B of ths Coda. 4. Conssquentiy, the writ peiition dessrvss io be aiiowsd and it Is hersby aiiowed. The order impugned passed by the Board of Revenue, order dated 9.7.2011 passed by the Coiisdor, Korba and order datsd 21,5.99 passed by the Sub Divisionai Officer, Katghora are hereby set sside. Case is remittsd to the Sub Divisionai Officer, Katghora for further inquiry in accordance with !aw. Tne Sub Divisiona! Officsr, Katghora after provlding comptets opportunity of hearing to ths parties shaii pass the order afr^sh. Parties are directed to remsin present before ths Sub -Divisiona! Officsr, Katghoraon 22.11.2011 forfurther proceeding ofthe case. No order as to costs. Sd/- T. P. Sharma Judge ^