IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.25226 OF 2009 SUDAMA SAH, SON OF RAM BHAJU SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHARWA, P.S. RASULPUR, DISTRICT CHHAPRA (SARAN) VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is of misuse of privilege of bail. It appears that bail bond of the petitioner was cancelled on 21.5.1995 and he has been taken into custody on 15.5.2009. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was earning his livelihood outside the State and he used to instruct his pairvikar and learned counsel representing his case in court. He submits that petitioner was not informed that his bail bond was cancelled. He submits that petitioner is a rustic villager and he did know the fact that he had to appear in the case for its early conclusion. He submits that petitioner will appear in court in the case on each and every date now till its conclusion and shall not leave the jurisdiction of the court without its prior permission. - 2 - Considering the above statements of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the application is allowed. Petitioner (Sudama Sah) is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District & Sessions Judge III, Chhapra in connection with S.T. No.97/92 arising out of Rasulpur P.S. Case no.48/91, subject to the condition that petitioner will appear in court on each and every date and shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court without prior permission of the court concerned failing which the court below will be at liberty to take coercive steps for his arrest. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)