IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CrWJC No 351 of 2009 Prem Prakash Arya, son of late K P Arya, Village & Post – Nimoia, P S – Ghorasahan, District – East Champaran, Motihari, at present Practising Advocate of Patna High Court - Petitioner Versus 1 The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna 2 The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar 3 The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna 4 The Superintendent of Police, Patna 5 Saikh Sabir, the then Officer-in-Charge, Rupaspur, P S – Danapur, Patna 6 The present Officer-in-charge, Rupaspur, P S – Danapur, Patna 7 Mr R N Prasad, House owner, SBI Colony, Phase No 3, House No 25, Ambedkar Path, North of Jagdeo Path, Patna 8 Mrs Bimala Devi, wife of R N Prasad, SBI Colony, Phase No 3, House No 25, Ambedkar Path, North of Jagdeo Path, Patna 9 Mr Amit Ranjan, son of R N Prasad, SBI Colony, Phase No 3, House No 25, Ambedkar Path, North of Jagdeo Path, Patna 10 Mr Rajeev Ranjan, son of R N Prasad, SBI Colony, Phase No 3, House No 25, Ambedkar Path, North of Jagdeo Path, Patna 11 Deputy Superintendent of Police, Danapur, District – Patna 12 District Magistrate, Patna - Respondents ----------- 4 23.11.2009 The writ petition appears to be absolutely misconceived. It is only for enforcement of rights which is already pending in a complaint with the Chief Judicial Magistrate. Merely because the petitioner appears to be a lawyer, this Court cannot exercise its discretion. There is no exception to the rule of law even in such cases. This application is not maintainable and is dismissed as such. M.E.H./ (Navaniti Prasad Singh)