1 12 cp 414.07 plus 2.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION srk CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 414 OF 2007 Mr.Barku N. Devkar & Anr. ..Petitioners. v/s. The Chairman & Ors. ..Respondents. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 55 OF 2008 Secretary, Nashik Mathadi And Unprotected Labour Board, Nashik ..Petitioner. v/s. Mr.Barku N. Devkar & Anr. ..Respondents. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 56 OF 2008 Sairam Rambhau Shinde & Ors. ..Petitioners. v/s. The Chairman & Ors. ..Respondents. AND CONTEMPT PETITION (L) NO. 9122 OF 2008 Kantilal N. Dhanvate & Ors. ..Petitioners. v/s. The Chairman & Ors. ..Respondents. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (L) NO. 16537 OF 2008 Trimbak A. Bagal ..Petitioner. v/s. The Chairman & Ors. ..Respondents. AND 2 12 cp 414.07 plus 2.doc CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 258 OF 2008 Kiran Karbhari Jadhav & Ors. ..Petitioners. v/s. Ushatai M. Shinde & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Gauri Jadhav for the Petitioner. Mr. R.M.Haridas i/b Mr.P.N.Joshi for the Respondent no.1. Ms. Lata Desai i/b Ms. Bharat Patil for the Respondent no.2. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 2ND SEPTEMBER, 2010. P.C. 1 After the lengthy arguments and looking to the reply filed by the Secretary of the APMC (Agricultural Produce Market Committee) in Contempt Petition No. 414 of 2007, it appears that the additional workers were engaged by the APMC after obtaining necessary permission from the Government of Maharashtra after filing Writ Petition before this court. Learned counsel for the Respondent no.2 Maharashtra State Mathadi Transport & General Workers Board also made a statement that the payment to all the workers had been made as per their own calculations. In view of this, the learned counsel for the Petitioner does not press the Contempt Petitions and Contempt Petitions stand disposed of accordingly. 3 12 cp 414.07 plus 2.doc 2 As the Contempt Petitions are disposed of, the Civil Applications also do not survive and stand disposed of accordingly. [ J.H.BHATIA, J. ]