Civil Revision No.1226 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1226 of 2010 Date of decision : 16.3.2010 Vijay Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Gurdev Kaur ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Dhirinder Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner. S. D. ANAND, J. The respondent-landlady had filed a petition for the ejectment of the petitioner-tenant from the tenanted premises on an averment of personal necessity. The averment, in the context, was that the tenanted premises are required for use by a handicapped son (Pritam Singh) of the respondent-landlord and also an unemployed grand son (Sarabjit Singh) and an unemployed qualified Pharmacist grand daughter who are otherwise putting up with the respondent-landlord. The learned Rent Controller recorded a very well reasoned finding under issue no.3. That finding was affirmed by learned Appellate Authority with equally appropriate reasoning. Both the Courts also recorded a concurrent finding to the effect that the tenanted premises have become unfit and unsafe for human habitation. There also, the view obtained by both the Courts is cemented by acceptable reasoning. Civil Revision No.1226 of 2010 -2- The learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner-tenant, was called upon to assail the validity of the impugned findings, however, has not been able to offer any item of grievance in the context. Findings to the above effect recorded by the learned Rent Controller and learned Appellate Authority, shall stand affirmed. Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner- tenant, requests that a little extra large time may be afforded to the petitioner-tenant to vacate the tenanted premises. It is argued that the grant of extra short while would enable the tenant to look for an appropriate alternate accommodation which would enable him to keep on earning bread and butter for his family. The learned counsel informs that he is under instructions from the petitioner- tenant to state that the non-honouring of that undertaking shall rendered him liable to the charge of violation of the orders of the Court and shall also be liable to eviction forthwith. It is ordered, in the circumstances of the case, that the petitioner herein shall have one year time from today to vacate the premises aforementioned. The petitioner-tenant shall be bound by the undertaking aforementioned. Further, the petitioner-tenant shall clear the arrears of rent within one month from today and also keep on paying rent by the 10th of every month. Disposed of accordingly. March 16, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE