CR No. 1389 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CR No. 1389 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.03.2010 Jagmohan Singh Chawla ....Petitioner Versus Rajesh Chauhan ....Respondent. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Arun Palli, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jai Bhagwan, Advocate for the petitioner. ... Alok Singh, J. (Oral). 1. This is a revision challenging the order whereby leave to contest was granted to the tenant on the ground that as to whether the property is residential property or commercial property is a debatable question between the parties. 2. Having heard learned counsel for the revisionist, I find no illegality or jurisdictional error in the impugned judgement granting leave to the tenant to contest the petition. Moreover, while granting leave, the lower Court has not committed any jurisdictional error. In view of this, I am not inclined to entertain the revision. The same is dismissed. However, in the CR No. 1389 of 2010 2 peculiar facts and circumstances of the case that the petitioner – landlord is going to retire on 14.5.2010, hearing of the main case is expedited. 3. If the landlord applies, learned trial Court can consider the prayer of the landlord for the early disposal of the case. 4. Disposed of accordingly. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 10.03.2010 sk.