1i-^siy"" ^s^""' ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WritPetjtionNp, 1716 of 1397 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Shri Manoj Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Shri Mahavir Pd. Agrawal, aged about 35 years, R/o Old Sarkanda, The & Distt. Bilaspur (MP) Versus 1. State of Madhya Pradesh, Through the Secretary, Deptt. of Water Resources, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP). 2. State of Madhya Pradesh, Through Collector, Biiaspur. 3. The Superintending Engineer, Hasdeo Pariyojana Mandat, Water Resources Department, Rampur/Korba, Distt. Bilaspur (MP). 4. Executive Engineer, Hasdeo Canal Division N0.1., Rampur, Korba, Distt. Bilaspur (MP). 5. The Land Acquisition Officer, Hasdeo Pariyojana, Post at Janjgir Distt. Biiaspur (MP). (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Aanihotri. J.i Present : Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for ttie State. i|p ifci»,,,., ^r' Sahu ORDER (Passed-on this 01st of October, 2007) (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that with the passage of time, this petition has become infructuous, to which iearned counsel appearing for the State has no objection. (2) It is ordered accordingly, (3) Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as hawng become infructuous. No order as to costs. Sdf- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge