IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7215 of 2011 KUMARI SWEETY SINHA, D/O SRI DHARMENDRA KUMAR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SHAILENDRA PRASAD @ SURENDRA PRASAD S/O RAMCHANDRA MAHTO ----------- 2. 27.4.2011 The petitioner has sought setting aside the order dated 7.9.2010 passed in Cr.Misc.No.22901 of 2010 by which the opposite party no.2 has been granted bail. It has been submitted that the order notes “It has been submitted that it appeared during investigation that in fact the petitioner himself was cheated by the co-accused persons on the pretext of offering a job of his lame son”. The Counsel for the petitioner contends that in fact there is no other co-accused and, therefore, there was no question of the petitioner being cheated by the co-accused. However, he concedes that during investigation it has transpired that in fact the petitioner had been cheated by some other persons. In view of such, there is no good ground for cancelling the bail of the opposite party no.2. The application is dismissed. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )