IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19989 of 2008 VIDYA NAND PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 17.09.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Silao P.S. Case No.302 of 2003 for the alleged offences registered under sections 498A, 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation in the FIR is to the effect that daughter of the informant was killed on account of non-fulfillment of dowry. It is submitted that the First Information Report was lodged by the father of the deceased against all the family members. It is further submitted that police after thorough investigation, taking into consideration the medical report, viscera report etc. found that daughter of the informant died on account of natural death after two months of the delivery of a child. He further submits that taking into consideration the above, the other accused persons have been allowed anticipatory bail by order dated 28.03.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. - 2 - 9333 of 2008 and other analogous cases. Learned counsel for the State upon perusal of the case diary containing the postmortem report, viscera report etc. is not in a position to oppose the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions, as noticed above, it is directed that the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Silao P.S. Case No.302 of 2003, within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bihar sharif at Nalanda , in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)