IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 26904 of 2007 Between: Md.Gouse S/o.Shaik Bandabi, R/o.H.No.1-2-83, Jama Masjid, Nalgonda Nalgonda District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Principle Secretary to the Government, labour & Employment & Training Factoreis, (Lab-IV) Department secretariat, Hyderabad, AP 2 The Assistant Commissioner of Labour, nalgonda Nalgonda District 3 The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Jubilee Bus Station Picket, Secunderabad 4 The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Nalgona Bus Depot Nalgonda District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not referring the dispute to the concerned Tribunal or Labour Court for adjudication in pursuance of the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.A/1735/93 dated 10.1.2000 as required under section 12(4) of Industiral Dispute Act as illegal, arbitrary, and unjust and consequently direct the 1st respondent to refer thedispute to theconcerned Tribunal or Labour Court for adjudication in pursuance of the 2nd respondent proceedings in Rc.No.A/1735/93 dated 10.1.2000 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.G.RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to 1st respondent to refer the dispute to the concerned Tribunal or Labour Court for adjudication in pursuance of the proceedings of 2nd respondent in Rc.No.A/1735/93, dated 10-01-2000 as required under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act. In the counter aﬃdavit ﬁled on behalf of respondents 1 and 2, it is stated that the dispute has been referred for adjudication to the Labour Court-III, Hyderabad, vide G.O.Rt.No.1698, L.E.T. & F. (Lab.I) Department dated 08-09-2000. In view of the same, nothing survives in the writ petition for further adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ------------------- C.V.RAMULU, J 1st September 2008 CVRK ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies