In THE H_IGH coum' or Junxcnq'uag, AT aILA§PUR (c.G.} mam ma. é?% Igqqg PEQWJ, Distt.- Janjgir Cham‘pa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTIdLE 226 a OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITs I ORDERS AND DIRECTIONS A s DEEMED FIT. Ramesh kumar Gond Son of/ Shrl Tlharu Ram Gond , aged about 42 years, Occupatlon- l, n st. Teacher, Govt. Mlddle (99w) °M$~Wg§hool ",‘twNawagarh, Mudhpar, Dlstt. Janjglr- Block ............ ‘ “wooig V ‘ ‘ champa (C.G.) wesg“ aa‘9‘3 RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattlsgarh, through/ the Secretary Government of Chhattlsgarh Department of Education, D.K.s. Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Director Publlc Instruction, / Raipur (C.G.) \ 3. District Education Officer, Distt.-Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 4. Biock Education Officer, / XI—HC-78 33" HW,WEW . ('5 9 6&3 2_ mama; 11:: 200 A Wm (W) mam mmm WW&‘WW mwm $W311§3T 11.12.2006 Shri A5hwani Shulda, rned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Sunita Jain, learn d P.L. forthe State/respondents. 8y this petition under Articles 226/227 9f the Constitutian of india, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to pay the incremente and seniority the basis of the date of their initial appointment in the light of th decieion rendered by the learned State Administrative Tribunal, 'J balpur in Griginal Application Ne. 1452J1Q98 (Harish Chandra ingh and others Vs. State of MP. and others‘) dated 31 .1 .2000 2. Learned counsel appe ring for the petitioner piaced on reeord copy of the order dated 9th tober 2006 passed by thie Court in Writ Petition (S) No. 54739006 ( akesh Kumar Sharma and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and in Writ Petition (S) No. 54?4l2005 (Jai Nath Bajpai . Stateof Chhattisgarh and others) and submits that the petitioner is similarly situated, therefore, the similar order may be passed. 3. The case ofthe petitio er. is that he was appointed as Assistant Teacher in the School Educat on Department on probation for a period of two years with the tixeds lary. However, later on, after completion ' of two years' probation, the p titioner was regularized but, he was not given the regular pay scale rom the date of his initial appointment. Other similarly situated. tea hers moved the State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur for regular ay-scale, wherein learned Tribunal vide order dated 31 .i .2000 allowe the same. The petitioner madeseveral ’.T.O. H a o c XI-HC-78 W W , W , W W ~ ..(.§.2...¢.a.i3.?— «oobwo a 200 é WW (W) mam? “WWW WW§WW v ~%3Tf—r‘cmm ' w representations to accord the s situated, but, the respondent petition. 4. Learned counsel fer th petitioner Submits that the petitioner may be ailowed to make a re reeentation to respondent No.1 to give similar treatment to the petitio er and same pay-scale which has been sanctioned to other similarly si uated teachers on account of the order of the State Administrative Tri counsel for the respondents/St 5. Having heard learned ct to the facts and circumstances the limited prayer made by iea to be reasonable. Therefore, representation within a' period No.1, raising all his grievance decide the said representation of 30 days from the date ot considering ali the points rai account the order dated 31. Administrative Tribunal in Origi 6. The writ petition is acct direction. No order as to costs. r. Certified copy as per rul ‘ Dhirendra Mishfa Judge ame treatment as he was aisa similariy have not paid any heed. ‘Thus, this —-: unal dated 31 1.2000, to which iearned ate has no objection. :unsei for the parties and having regard ofthe case, in the opinion ofthis Court, rned counsei for the petitioner appears the petitioner is ailowed to make a of two weeks from today to respondent s and, in turn, respondent No.1 shall in an ohjective manner within a period receipt of such representation, after sect by the petitioner and taking into 1.2000 passed by the teamed State 1al Appiication No. 1452/1998. irdingly disposed of with the aforesaid up (I! Sdl- @ 4 e ¢ P.T.O.