HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI WRIT PETITION NO:8352 OF 2010 DATE:22.7.2010. Between: B.Ravikumar …Petitio And: The Principal Secretary to Government, Housing Department, Hyderabad & others …Responde This Court made the following: HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI WRIT PETITION NO:8352 OF 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed the present writ petition seeking a w mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not regula his services in spite of completion of 5 years of service or completion of payment of minimum emoluments with effect 25.8.1996 onwards or whichever is earlier by following G.O.Rt.No dated 8.5.2006 and G.O.Rt.No:265, dated 6.9.2003 as illegal arbitrary. The case of the petitioner is that he joined in A.P. State Ho Corporation Limited as a casual labour in the office of Proddutur Division of the 1st respondent Office on 25.8.1991 and he work various places and he belongs to S.C community. After completi 5 years of service, he made a representation on 25.11.2008 to th respondent for regularization of his services. However, t employees who have completed 5 years of service were regulariz the light of G.O.Rt.No:138, dated 8.5.2006. It is his further case short fall of SC/ST in the category of work inspectors was fille through employment exchanges. The services of 47 work inspec were recruited under SC/ST backlog vacancies during the year and subsequent years and their services were also regularized i cadre of work inspectors by issuing G.O.Rt.No:265, dated 6.9.2 Basing on the said G.O and as per the memo issued by Government, the 3rd respondent sent a proposal to the 2nd respo vide Lr.R.C.No:B/2674/03, dated 28.11.2008 requesting regularization of services of the petitioner though he possesse (Draughtsman) qualification. But, till date, they have not taken action. Apart from that, the Housing Department issued G.O.Rt. dated 18.1.2010, where under the authorities recommended the ca the employee i.e., M.Ramanaiah who is on the same footing, an services were also regularized subsequently. But, the services o petitioner have not been regularized. Hence, the present writ petit filed by the petitioner. Heard the learned counsel and perused the material availab record. The fact that remains undisputed is that the petitioner join A.P. State Housing Corporation Limited as a casual labour in the o of Proddutur sub division of the 1st respondent Office on 25.8.1991 he worked in various places and he belongs to S.C community and completion of 5 years of service, he made a representatio 25.11.2008 to the 3rd respondent for regularization of his services. In this background of the matter, without expressing any op on the merits of the case, We feel that it would suffice if respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularizati his services as per G.O.Rt.No: 138, dated 8.5.2006. No order costs. _____________________ Justice T.Meenakum Date:22.07.2010 NN HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI WRIT PETITION NO:8352 OF 2010 DATE:22.7.2010.