'Sss' & s ,L''isiS ai.i'S.o fei?tLae'S^^S § C^ [^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT '. P. (S) PETITIONER ..0< <^' '^ r^.^ ^y^ RESPONDENT'S ..•••''.'\:^ ^^.y o)t§^%r" ..- ^y ^•' .!f •'(••''^' .^ •?"''.,,&-'" Assistant Teacher, Primary School (C.G.) VERSUS /" State of Chhattisgrh, Throu; Tribal Welfare D.K.S. Raipur(C.G.) •^. Commissioner, Shawan, Government 3. Assistant 4. Block Education Officer, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THJ OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTICE IN THE ^D HI6HCQURT QF WHATTISGARH AT BIL^SPUR Petitioner W. P.rsyNo. 770 of 2007 Smt. Kamleshwari Bhendia, (Now Thakur) Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and other-s And W. P.(S) No. 771 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Kalpna Shende (Now Mahajan) Versus ftespondents : State of Chhattisgarh and otiiers SB; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Present: Mr. Anil Singh Rajput, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Satish Gupta, Deputy (Sovernment Advocate for the respondents/State. OR D ER (Passed on 1his 8th &cy of Februory, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that -tiie facts of the present writ petition are similar to that of in W. P. (5) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. State ©overnmentof Chhattisgarh & other-s), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. They further submit •t+iat the question of law involved is also the same. 2. In view of the above-stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petitions are allowed in t^rms of the order dated 7.11.2006 passed by this Court in W.P. (S.) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari omd others vs. 5tate Sovernment of Chhattisgarh & others). No order os to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record in connected writ petitions. sd/- • SatishK; Judge •^Mt^\