IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2934 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 2934 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 2934 OF 2002 Shenoywadi Rahiwashi Sangh ..Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Ms. M.S. Shringarpure i/by P.G. Karande for the Petitioner Mr. D.A. Nalawade, G.P. for Respondent No.1 Ms. A.K. Savla for Respondent No.3 G.D. Utangare i/by Utangale & Co. for Respondent No.2 Basant Tilokani, Applicant in CWS 76/2008 CORAM CORAM CORAM : SHRI J.N.PATEL & : SHRI J.N.PATEL & : SHRI J.N.PATEL & SHRI SHRI SHRI K.K.TATED, J.J. K.K.TATED, J.J. K.K.TATED, J.J. DATE DATE DATE : 18th July 2008. : 18th July 2008. : 18th July 2008. P.C.: . Heard. 2. The subject matter of the Petition pertains to Rehabilitation scheme under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance & Redevelopment) Act, 1971. This Court in the matter of Tulsiwadi Navnirman Co-op Tulsiwadi Navnirman Co-op Tulsiwadi Navnirman Co-op Housing Housing Housing Society Ltd. & anr. Versus State of Society Ltd. & anr. Versus State of Society Ltd. & anr. Versus State of Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra & Ors. reported in 2008(1) Bom.C.R.1, (Full & Ors. reported in 2008(1) Bom.C.R.1, (Full & Ors. reported in 2008(1) Bom.C.R.1, (Full Bench) Bench) Bench) has directed the State to constitute a committee to look into the matter and accordingly the State has provided for such a committee which is functional i.e. : 2 : Slum Area Rehabilitation Committee to look into the scheme of Slum Rehabilitation and to examine the process of Rehabilitation Scheme. Therefore, we dispose of this Petition with the direction to the parties to approach the High Powered Committee constituted by the State, which can very well examine the issue raised in this Petition. In so far as, Chamber Summons No. 76 of 2008 concerned, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). This petition stands disposed off. 3. In view of the fact that this Court has referred the matter to the High Power Committee, the Notice of Motion does not survive. Hence, the Notice of Motion No.691 of 2006 and 339 of 2005 are disposed off accordingly. (J.N. (J.N. (J.N. Patel, J.) Patel, J.) Patel, J.) (K.K. (K.K. (K.K. Tated, J) Tated, J) Tated, J)