1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7556 OF 2009 Pathan Javedkhan Ammanullakhan & Anr. .. Petitioners versus M/s.Sagar Steel through its alleged owner Abdul Rauf Abdul Gaffar Memon & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.M.M.Sathaye for the pettitioners. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 24th September 2009. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. By this writ petition unde Article 227 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners who are the 1st and 2nd defendants, the challenge is to an order permitting the amendment of the plaint. The 1st respondent filed a suit for declaration of ownership of the suit property described in paragraph 1 of the plaint which is a land admeasuring 0.05 Ares together with tin shed and construction thereon as well as existing steel furnace and machinery therein. By the proposed amendment, the 1st respondent seeks to delete a part of the suit property i.e the tin shed together with steel furnace and machinery therein. He is seeking a consequential amendment as a result of the deletion of part of the property referred to above. 2 2. The plaintiff cannot be compelled to restrict his suit to the original suit property described in the original plaint. The consequences of deletion will follow and the petitioners can always raise appropriate contentions in that behalf in the written statement which may be filed to the amended plaint. No case for interference in writ jurisdiction is made out. Writ petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA,J)