- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.228/2007 IN SECOND APPEAL (St) NO.11471/1999 Rama Sitaram Kale & others. ...Appellants.. Versus Ganpat Shivram Ambhure (died) through L.Rs. & others. ...Respondents... ..... S/Shri U.R. Chavan and S.K. Adkine, Advocates for appellants (absent). Shri M.K. Jamdhade, Advocate for respondent nos.1/1 to 1/7 and 2 to 5. Respondent no.6 served. ..... CORAM: R.M. BORDE, J. DATE: 15.09.2009 PER COURT: The application was placed for orders on Friday i.e. 11.9.2009, the counsel for the applicants was absent. It was directed to place the matter for admission and orders. Today also, when the matter is called out twice during the course of the day, the counsel appearing for the applicants / appellants did not turn up. There are three counsel appointed by the - 2 - appellants, however, none of them appeared when the matter was called out. The appeal was presented in 1999 and is still pending for admission since then. In this situation, therefore, there is no other alternative except to dismiss the application for want of prosecution. The application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Consequently, the second appeal also stands dismissed. (R.M. Borde, J.) ndk/c159094