CW 13339/08 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.13339/2008 Bholu Ram Versus Rajesh Yadav & Ors. Date of Order ::: 20/07/09 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Arvind Bhardwaj, for petitioner Mr. Ronak Singhvi, for respondents Instant petition has been filed assailing orders of revenue courts below whereby application filed by petitioner U/s 212 of Rajasthan Tenancy Act, seeking temporary injunction in revenue suit No.151/2006 has been rejected observing that he has not been able to establish prima facie case for grant of interim relief. As alleged, petitioner instituted a revenue suit seeking permanent injunction before SDO Kota to restrain defendants from making encroachment, dispossessing and not disturbing him from cultivating over land in dispute; and alongwith suit, temporary injunction was also sought. The SDO Kota taking note of material on record arrived at a conclusion that petitioner was unable to establish prima facie case for grant of interim relief and as such rejected prayed for temporary injunction vide order dt.20/03/06 CW 13339/08 //2// (Ann.4), against which appeal and so also revision petition were preferred respectively before Revenue Appellate Authority & the Board of Revenue but met with the same fate vide orders dt.24/05/06 (Ann.5) & 05/08/08 (Ann.6). Counsel has reiterated the submissions made before revenue courts and submits that if interim relief is not granted in favour of petitioner, very purpose for filing revenue suit will be frustrated. The Board of Revenue in para 7 of judgment impugned has observed about material having been taken note of and in this view whereof, this Court does not find any manifest error being committed by courts below which may call for interference. Consequently, writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. No costs. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p2/13339CW08-Jul20-Ds.doc