WP(C) 2335/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. S.K. Goswami, the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that the Revenue Appeal No.115 RA(GLT)/ 2007 filed by the present respondent No.3 before the learned Board of Revenue, t hough was dismissed for default, the same was restored to file without hearing t he petitioner. The further case of the petitioner is that the learned Board even decided the appeal vide order dated 30.11.2009 without hearing the petitioner, as he did not have any knowledge about the restoration of the appeal, which was earlier dismissed for default. The petitioner has a remedy by way of review under the provisions of Ass am Board of Revenue Regulation, 1963, if the allegation made by the petitioner i n the present petition is correct. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with the observation that the petitioner may approach the learned Board of Revenue seekin g review of the order passed and in the event of filing such review together wit h an application for condonation of delay, the same shall be considered by the l earned Board of Revenue in accordance with law. The petitioner in order to enabl e him to approach the learned Board of Revenue is granted 3(three) weeks’ time. For the aforesaid period of 3(three) weeks status quo as regards the pos session of the land as on today shall be maintain.