PETITIONERS (:z‘x C W62 /2o1o 1. Smt. Anand Kumari Kujur, W/o Pradeep Kumar Kujur, aged about 44 years, working as Head Master at T.W.D. primajy School, Semartal, B10Ck~ pharasabahar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through :— The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K‘S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, Distt.— Jashpur (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Block —Pharasabahar Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) Treasury Officer, Treasury Account & Pension Jashpur, Distt.—Jashpur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS /:1 IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAT§IS¢ARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As mentioned in the'cause title above. $§Ex§§§iE $‘EN€H W.P.(S) NO. WW WW (Wu) ‘ WWWMWWW £999 {w} MPéR {SC} 5,9. it is further submitted that this Court has also taken a similar View in his order dated 06-02-2009 passed in W.P.(S)i\io.6257 of 2(308‘ Learned counsel for the petitioner tunher drawe attention of this Court to order dated No,124 of 2009, wherein relying upon in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) artid the order passed by this Court in another Writ Appeal No.8712009, consideration of the case for grant r circular dated 21—094 974 issued by i verification ofthe facts pleaded in the Learned counset for the resp petitioner would also be considered or directions have been issued for if two advance increments as per he state of Madhya Pradesh, after )etitioni ondents submits that case of the the same lines. 29-04—2010 passed in Writ Appeal the judgment of the Supreme Court WWW ammm mm swam WW%‘E€IW €6 W 311%?! 51’: Hon’biré $hrlMamné¥a EWsIEan 3hriva$tava J. G2n67=2a10 Shri Samkant Verma, sounse! far the petiticnerl Shri Bhaskar Payashi, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondems on advance copy. Heard, Learned counse! appearing fur the pemiener gubmits that the petitioner Is entmed to benefh sf two advance increments an acceunt cf ehe having passed BEd. examination before her appaintment at her own cost. it is eubmitted that the issue involved in the present petition is n0 ionger res infegra and the same hae Jeen finally decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Ashe 8exeiza ye. Siaz’e at? Eisii? d ewe, EWWW mmfawim MWW m View 0f the statement made abGve, this petmon is finaily disposed sf with a direction to the res )ondent autharities to considxer and decide the ciaim of the petiticrier for grant Gf twc advance increments; as per cireuiar dated 21—99—4974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradeeh, after verificatior‘ ofthe facts pleaded ir the petition Within a period of eight i\ weeks from teday Tumane \ \\ Sdh’ Manindra Menan §hrlvastava i judge ‘ x, / WWkgjmgé W 200 311%?!W (Wu) KWmm WWW 1%2'! WK F (L/ Q? aimm