IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY WRIT PETITION No.13212 of 2005 Between: Smt.B.Bharati. … Petitioner And Mandal Revenue Officer, Shaikpet village, Ranga Reddy District. … Respondent Counsel for the petitioners: Sri P.Sreenivasa Rao for Sri P.Sree Raghu Ram. Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Revenue. This Court made the following: ORDER:- At the interlocutory stage, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent not to interfere with the developments being made by the petitioner in her land admeasuring 923 Sq.yards, situated in premises bearing Door No.8-2-12, 13 and 14 in Plot Nos.12,13 and 14 in new Survey No.331 (Old survey No. 129/50) of Sheikpet village, without following the procedure established by law. In the counter-affidavit filed by the respondent, along with the vacate stay application, it is, inter alia, mentioned that the respondent has initiated proceedings vide: LGC SR No.1198 of 2007, under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 (for short “the Act”) for eviction of the petitioner. In view of this fact, the grievance of the petitioner that the respondent is seeking to dispossess her without following due process of law ceased to exist. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to contest the proceedings initiated by the respondent under the provisions of the Act. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WVMP No.2759 of 2007 and WPMP No.16769 are also disposed of as infructuous. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J 19-6-2008 MNR