1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 22 of 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20 of 2009 IN ARA NO. 22 OF 2009 M/.s Zenith Metaplast Pvt. Ltd. ....Appellant v/s. M/s. Karia Hotels Pvt. Ltd. & anr. ....Respondents Shri Shriram S. Kulkarni for the appellant. Shri Vilas B. Tapkir for the respondents. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED:- August 07, 2009. P.C. Counsel for the Respondent in all fairness states on instructions that the Respondents have no intention to forcibly dispossess the Appellant. Indeed, the Respondents would take recourse to remedy as may be permissible by law for getting back possession of the disputed property. In view of this statement, nothing survives for consideration in the Appeal. The Statement made by the Respondents is accepted. The Appeal is disposed of on the above terms. 2. It is made clear that the Arbitrator would decide the proceedings 2 uninfluenced by the observations made in the impugned decision in accordance with law. All questions are left open to be decided in appropriate proceedings on its own merits. 3. In view of this order, nothing survives for consideration in the Application. The same is disposed of. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J