IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6734 of 2010 KISHORE KANT SINGH S/O SATYENDRA SINGH R/O VILL.- POKHARA, P.S. MAHARAJ GANJ, DISTT.- SIWAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SIWAN 5. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT TEACHER APPELLATE AUTHORITY, SIWAN 6. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION-CUM-CO- ORDINATOR, SIWAN 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, MAHARAJGANJ, SIWAN 8. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, MAHARAJGANJ, SIWAN 9. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ POKHARA, P.S. MAHARAJGANJ, DISTT.- SIWAN 10. NIRAJ KUMAR SINGH S/O SRI MOTILAL SINGH R/O VILL.- POKHARA, P.S. MAHARAJGANJ, DISTT.- SIWAN ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh. For respondent No.10 : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra. For the State : Mr. Ghurjati Kumar Prasad, GP 6 ___ 2. 18.1.2011 Heard learned for the petitioner and the State. This Court fails to understand the motive or the reason for filing such a frivolous writ petition on behalf of the petitioner on a mistaken advice may be. Facts stand that the petitioner was appointed as a Panchayat Teacher. His appointment became a subject matter of scrutiny because the so-called degree obtained by the petitioner was sent for verification before the Controller of the Examination, Darbhanga Sanskrit University and the said University categorically informed the authorities that the so-called degree or the certificate produced by the petitioner was a forged one. When this exercise was going on cornered by the situation, 2 if not confronted by the ground reality, the petitioner sent a letter or information to the tribunal informing that he has already resigned from the post and that matter should not be pursued. According to the petitioner, if the tribunal has proceeded in the matter thereafter, then the order passed is wrong. This Court fails to understand as to what is the infirmity in the decision since the letter of the petitioner was brought to the notice of the tribunal, may be at the instance of the petitioner but it does not take away the criminal element of his conduct. The tribunal has rightly ordered institution of an FIR and investigation into the case. The petitioner, in fact, should be dealt with by a firm hand for filing such ill-advised writ application. When the petitioner himself had volunteered to walk away from the job and the tribunal has only confirmed that situation, where is the occasion to challenge such an order more so by the petitioner. Petitioner is directed to deposit a cost of Rs.10, 000/- which should be payable to the Legal Services Authority, Patna High Court within three months. The Court further directs the Superintendent of Police, Siwan to ensure that the FIR, if not instituted, shall be instituted against the petitioner and taken to its logical end. The writ application is dismissed. Let a copy of this order be forwarded to the Superintendent of Police, Siwan. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)