IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45209 of 2008 PARMANAND SAH … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Shri A.K.Sharma For the State: Sri Dashrth Mehta,APP ----------- 2. 10.11.2008 Heard. The renewal prayer is on various grounds including one indicated in Annexure- 1, that is, absence of the counsel. The Court believes that learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied by the patient hearing of the bail petition by the court. After hearing the matter, the conclusion the Court reaches is that there is no good reason for reviewing the earlier order including the ground of bail granted to accused Mamta Devi who happens to be the wife of the present petitioner. The reasons could be indicated in annexure-4 which is the copy of the bail order passed by a Bench of this Court in respect of Mamta Devi that the petitioner was litigating with the lady and she claimed living separately from the petitioner. The petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)