IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 21ST OCTOBER 2010 / 29TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 32321 of 2010(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ------------------------- S.RAJAN, PAY WARD ASSITANT,TALUK HEAD QUARTERS HOSPITAL, PULANUR, STATE VICE PRESIDENT, KHRWS STAFF UNION (INTUC), GENERAL HOSPITAL CAMPUS THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.RAJESH RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETRIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HEALTH DEPARTMENT & VICE CHAIRMAN, KERALA HEALTH RESEARCH AND WELFARE SOCIETY (KHRWS),GENERAL HOSPITAL CAMPUS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001 3. KERALA HEALTH RESEARCH AND WELFARE SOCIETY (KHRWS),GENERAL HOSPITAL CAMPUS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001 4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA HEALTH RESEARCH AND WELFARE SOCIETY (KHRWS),GENERAL HOSPITAL CAMPUS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001 GOVERNMENT PLEADER P.NANDAKUMAR ADV.M.AJAY, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No.32321 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 21st day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner claims to be the office bearer of a union of employees of the 3rd respondent-Kerala Health Research and Welfare Society. But he has filed this writ petition with himself as the petitioner and not the Union represented by the petitioner. In this writ petition, he espouses the cause of the casual cleaners employed in the 3rd respondent. He seeks the following reliefs: “(i) issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ direction or order commanding the respondents to immediately implement and take necessary action based on the decision of the Governing Body of the KHRWS in its 114th meeting held on 30.07.2007 regarding the regularization of 29 casual cleaners in the existing vacancies resolved as per Item No.1 of Additional Agenda (Ext.P1), with effect from the date of Ext.P1 i.e. 30.07.2007, within a time frame to be fixed by this Honoruable Court and issue necessary orders; (ii) issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ direction or order commanding the respondents to immediately implement and take necessary action based on the decision of the Governing Body of the KHRWS in its 117th meeting held on 07.01.2010 regarding the regularisation of 74 casual cleaners excluding the 29 cleaners governed by Ext.P1 decision in the existing vacancies, with effect from the date of 117th Governing Body meeting i.e. 07.01.2010, within a time frame to be fixed by this Honourable Court and issue necessary orders.” The petitioner himself is not a casual cleaner seeking regularization. Actually, he is a regular employee working as a Pay Ward Assistant. The petitioner does not seek for himself any reliefs in this writ petition. Therefore, the petitioner does not have any locus standi to file this writ petition, insofar as the casual cleaners w.p.c.32321/10 2 themselves have not chosen to approach this Court seeking the said reliefs. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable at the instance of the petitioner. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge