1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 53. CA/10448/2008 In FAST/18755/2008 with 53-A: C.A. no. 10449 of 2008 in FAST NO.18763 of 2008 with 54. CA/10450/2008 In FAST/18769/2008 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. D.V.Tele, Mr. V.D.Rakh, A.G.P., for the applicant. Mr. A.S.Usmanpurkar, Adv., for respondent. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:22-2-2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. In all these appeals, the State seeks to condone delay of 1274 and 1549 days. The judgment in LAR No.142/1996 is dt. 30.12.2002, in LAR No.140/1996, is dt.10.3.2004 and in LAR No. 239/1996, is dt.30.12.2002. The learned Judge made the enhancement at the rate of Rs.600/- per R., in subsequent LAR Rs.525/- per R and 2 in the last at Rs.600/- per R. Sale instance at Exh.20 was also considered. Learned Judge was equipped with a settlement arrived at between few of other claimants with the State where State agreed for enhancing the compensation to two and half times than what the Special Land Acquisition Officer has recorded. 3. The delay, referred above, is exorbitant, not sufficiently explained. Consequently, it is difficult to digest that official hassles added to the agony of the officers. Delay is not condoned. Consequently, Civil Applications for condonation of delay along with the appeals are dismissed. Necessary Court fees be refunded. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/10448-08cagr