1 wp6387.11.sxw ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6387 OF 2011 August Land Developers Pvt. Ltd. ......Petitioner. Vs. Pune Zilla Parishad Pune & Ors. ......Respondents. Mr. A.V. Anturkar with Mr. Sughandh B. Deshmukh for the Petitioner. Mr. V.S. Gokhale, AGP for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM :- D.K DESHMUKH AND ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE :- 24 AUGUST 2011. P.C. :- Admittedly the land of the Petitioner has been acquired. The case of the Petitioner is that possession of his land has not been taken but entries are being taken in the revenue record showing Zilla Parishad for whose benefit the land has been acquired to be the owner of the land. If according to the Petitioner the entries are not being taken in accordance with law, his remedy is to challenge those entries in appropriate proceedings under the Land Revenue Code. One more grievance that is made by the Petitioner is that the authorities are not 2 wp6387.11.sxw ssm taking possession of the entire land at one time but they are taking possession of vacant land but possession of the land which is built upon is not being taken. In our opinion, this controversy cannot be resolved here. According to the Petitioner if for any reasons the land cannot be used for the public purpose for which it is acquired, the Petitioner can apply under Section 48 for deletion of the land from acquisition. In our opinion, taking over all view of the matter, it is not the case where this court can interfere at this stage. 2 The Writ Petition is accordingly rejected. There shall be no order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (D.K. DESHMUKH, J.)