IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37654 of 2009 GUDDU SINGH Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Lakhmina Devi ----------- 5/ 21.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that torture is for demand followed by petitioner’s having illicit relation with his sister-in-law (Bhabhi) but her husband has also been made accused. If there would have been any illicit relation of the petitioner with his brother’s wife, there could be no occasion to support the torture caused by petitioner and his wife or that relation may never be supported by parents also. Specifically, it is said that complainant left matrimonial house voluntarily deserted the petitioner and any attempt to restitute the relation is not succeeding. Taking that into consideration, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 1065 of 2007 giving rise to Trial No. 1520 of 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Kaimur at Bhabhua subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)