1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7024 OF 1999 Shri Ramchandra V.Yadav Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & ors.. Respondents Mr.Vijay Patil for Petitioner Ms.P.S.Cardozo, Assistant Government Pleader for for Respondent nos. 1 and 2. Respondent no. 3 is served Respondent no. 4 is served by R.P.A.D. CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : S.B.MHASE AND S.B.MHASE AND S.B.MHASE AND D.G.KARNIK, D.G.KARNIK, D.G.KARNIK, JJ JJ JJ DATED DATED DATED : 16th January, 2006 : 16th January, 2006 : 16th January, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The Writ Petition was called out on 10th January, 2006 when learned counsel for the petitioner reported no instructions but, sought time to call his client and take instructions. Accordingly, the matter was adjourned to 16th January, 2006. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner states that despite communications to the petitioner, the petitioner has chosen not to give any instructions to him and accordingly reports no instructions. 2 2. Petition is therefore, disposed of for non prosecution. (D.G. (D.G. (D.G. KARNIK, J) KARNIK, J) KARNIK, J) (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, J) J) J)