IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 5506/2008 Decided on:30.7.2010 _____________________________________________ Ramesh Chand. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Nemo. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. Advocate General. ____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner is aggrieved by the recording of the adverse entries for the year 1994-95. He has made representation for expunging these entries to Director of Ayurveda, Himachal Pradesh on 7.2.1997. The same has not been decided till date. 2. Consequently, there will be a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation made by the petitioner, as noticed hereinabove, by a speaking/reasoned order. Petitioner shall also be heard in person. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 3. In view of above direction, the petition is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 30.7.2010 *awasthi*