In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. 62537-M of 2006 Date of decision:30.7.2007 Gurmeet Singh and others ---Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab ---Respondent Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SARON *** Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. I.P.S.Sidhu, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate, for the complainant. *** S.S.Saron J. (Oral) Mr. I.P.S. Sidhu, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab on instructions from Dilbagh Singh SI, Police Station, Mullepur District Fatehgarh Sahib submits that the cancellation report is being filed in the case, therefore, custody of the petitioner is not required for the purposes of investigation. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that the petitioners have committed the offences as attributed to them and the cancellation report is being wrongly filed. Keeping in view the fact that cancellation report is being filed and custody of the petitioner is not required for the purposes of investigation, the present petition seeking pre-arrest bail is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. However, in future in case the custody of the petitioner is Crl. Misc. No. 62537-M of 2006 -2- required for the purposes of investigation, the petitioner shall be given five days' notice in advance. The complainant may seek his other remedies including that of filing a protest petition in case a cancellation report is filed. Criminal Miscellaneous stands disposed of. (S.S.SARON) JUDGE July 30, 2007 paramjit