IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.7041 -M of 2011 DATE OF DECISION : JULY 7, 2011 SATISH BAJAJ ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: None for the petitioner(s). Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. Inderjit Arora, Advocate, for respondents 4 & 5. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 This petition has been filed under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, praying for issuance of directions to the official respondents to take action against the private respondents for illegally entering the house of the petitioner. Further prayer is for issuance of directions to respondent No.2 i.e. Senior Superintendent of Police, Sri Muktsar Sahib, to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members. 2 Reply on behalf of the respondent-State has been filed. 3 It has been brought out that during inquiry, it was found that there is a dispute in regard to parental house between the parties. The petitioner and respondents No.4 and 5 are Criminal Misc. No.7041 -M of 2011 2 closely related. While the petitioner alleges that he has purchased the house, respondents No.4 and 5 i.e. brother of the petitioner and his wife, are residing therein. In regard to the incident of 24.9.2009, it has been said that no such incident of breaking of locks and taking illegal possession had taken place. Rather, respondents No.4 and 5 have given documents i.e. ration card, letter of bank, electricity bill, etc., which indicate that respondents No.4 and 5 have been residing in the house. It has also been brought out that a civil suit entitled 'Satish Kumar v. Harish Bajaj etc.' is pending adjudication. 4 Considering the contents of the reply, no ground for issuance of directions under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, is made out. 5 The petition is dismissed. July 7, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?