4) Maksudan (dead). ‘X / 5) Jhulu 3/0 Ram Sahai Brahman, aged about 50 years, A (Q o‘ R/O Umariya, Tahasil& Thana Bemetara, District ; %\\ . a'*° Durg. ‘0 V. 6) a) Bhagwantin Bai Wd/o Nandu Dhobi , aged 45 years, R/o Village Umariya, Post Kanhera, Tehsil Bemetara, District Durg. b) Tilak S/o Late Nandu Dhobi, R/o Village Umariya, Post Kanhera, Tahsil Bemetara,Halmukam,Dhobi Para, Kawardha, a.‘ District Kawardha, Tahsil & District Kawardha. 7) Kanshi Ram S/o Pakla Sahu (dead). v,. Beirggaggrieved bygrder datedl .1220 3 dggivil Appeal No.124 A/2002E’the p‘1‘§ini fs pie er thfs igce11m$$?Appea1 on the followinéfacts and grounds: Contd. .2 * V v IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR: C.G. MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL N0. ) 0 a OF “2004 \// MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43, RULE l (k), CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908. Appellants: 1) Badri Prasad S/o Premlal Lodhi, aged about 50 years, Plaintiffs 2) Goverdhan S/o Badri Prasad, aged about 32 years, 3) ’Lal Bahdur S/o Badri Prasad, aged about 28 years, I RII$¢§WL Taman Singh @ SarkaLS/o Badri Prasad, aged about I 25 years, = ®T§l§$yf 93%”. 5) Devi Singh S/o Badri Pradad, aged about 20 years, .«1 X’“%‘ \V ‘Q’; \a‘ All agriculturists and R/o Village Beter, Thana & e" tvw Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg. $ ( - Q" ‘geoi.....-"u. VERSUS v‘° Respondents: 1) State ofC.G. ‘3 Defendents Through Collector, Durg. 2) Collector, Durg. 3) Sub-Divisional-Offlcer, Bemetara, District Durg. WWW(WE _T, aw‘i wax Hr‘Ea V L . MW“, 4‘. \V\ ~(%\ \og ’&\)\ WW mm? 13; fgré? ${ER éxafrnw, saw -W 05 ll OH ‘GMJ 7¢$ fYQ.SE’\ Jé Lu nm/ émmsel ‘74°* é ‘ w— (L Avtm/ aéma Mg 73]) M wM Sd/- chief Jus‘ice 5 MLM I G 3:?RJ—FS/ 7X Ni: i230 1m. I, agaiav m £ J i