1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Sixth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.PALANIVELU CRL OP(MD) No.12041 of 2011 GANESAN @ ANVAR HUSSAIN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERALAM POLICE STATION, PERALAM, TIRUVARUR DISTRICT IN CR.NO. 334 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.MURUGANANTHAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Addl.Public Prosecutor ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/accused was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 26.08.2011 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act, 1985 in Crime No.334 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that a false case has been foisted against him for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B)of NDPS Act, 1985 in Crime No.334 of 2011. He further submitted that the petitioner was found in possession of 1.100 Kgs of Ganja and he is an innocent person and the investigation is considerably over and hence, he prays for enlargement on bail. 3. The learned Additional Public prosecutor(crl.Side) would submit that the petitioner was found in possession of 1.100 Kgs of Ganja without any valid licence, and the investigation is pending and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the petitioner was found in possession of 1.100 Kgs of Ganja without any valid licence, which is below in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 commercial quantity and the investigation is considerably over, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam, and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. sd/- 26/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NANNILAM. 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUVARUR DISTRICT. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERALAM POLICE STATION, PERALAM,TIRUVARUR DISTRICT. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 5 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, TRICHY. +1 CC to M/S. T.MURUGANANTHAM Advocate SR.No.33233 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12041 of 2011 Date :26/09/2011 PA/28.09.2011/2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/