QA)/// [my IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. ‘W‘M /2011 PETITIONER : // Smt. Rajkishori Bhagat, W/o Pradeep Kumar Ram, aged about 50 years, Head Mistress, Govt. Boys Primary School Lailunga, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : / 1. State of Chhatu'sgarh, Through the Secretary, \ Department of School Education, D. K. S. Bhawan, Rajpur. 0/ \\ m”. wt” ’3’ , 2. The Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) $°“ w QEK 2. The District Educaiion O$cer, ...... 9‘ Distict Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT. ‘ 7‘ WRIT PETITION (S) No. 4714 ofZOII PETITIONER : Smt. Rajkishori Bhagat. RESPONDENTS m HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh & Others. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotl;' J. Shn' Ravindra Agrawal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Government Advocate for the State. ORDER g ORAL l (Passed on 18 day of August, 201 1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was promoted from the post of Assistant Teacher to the post of Head Mistress vide order dated 27.06.2011 (AnnexurerP/2) and posted at Boys Primary School, Lailunga. Thereafter, vide the impugned order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P/l), the petitioner has been transferred to Dharamjaigarh, on the option of Block Education Odicer. Shri Agrawal further submits that the said order is defective as the petitioner has been shown as Assistant Teacher, and her place of posting has also erroneously been shown as Primary School, Navin Kunjara, whereas the petitioner is posted at Lailunga. Shri Bhaduri. learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that if there is any clerical mistake in the impugred transfer order, as aforestated, the same shall be corrected and a hesh order shall be passed. He further submits that till then, the impugned order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P/l) shall not be given eEect to in respect ofthe petitioner. In view of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforestated observation. Sd/- SATISH K. ANGNIHORI Judge