IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33801 of 2011 Mithilesh Mehta @ Mithilesh Kumar Mehta son of Ramratan Mehta, resident of Village-Badarpur, P.S.-Kutumba, District- Aurangabad (Bihar). ..........Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar. ...........Opposite Party ----------- 02 30.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is accused in connection with Complaint Case No. 476 of 2009 in which cognizance has been taken under sections 493, 376 and 312 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is an accused of cheating the complainant with regard to money which were paid on account of the death of the husband of the complainant, who was the elder brother of the petitioner. It is also alleged that the petitioner mislead and cheated her on the pretext that he was going to marry her and even induced her to co-habit. It is also alleged that she twice became pregnant with the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at the relevant time, the petitioner was only 19 years of age and the complainant has three children out of the earlier wedlock to his elder deceased brother. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that no medical report by way of proof has been brought on record to the termination of pregnancy due to the result of pressure of the petitioner and his family members. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of State submits that there is direct allegation against the petitioner and he has 2 misappropriated all the money, which was due to the complainant and has also cheated her by not marrying her and also made her co-habit and thus did not deserve any indulgence by this Court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The application for anticipatory bail to the petitioner stands dismissed. Safik (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)