$0 Petitioner Defendant Respondent w i Plaintiff Alok Jayaswal Slo Shri Sitram Jayaswal. By Caste Jayaswal, aged about 32 years, Occupation Service, R/o Patel Para, Korba, P.S., Tahsil and District Korba (CG) (Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India) Mr.Awadh Tripathi, counsel for the petitioner. (SB: Hon’ble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) ORDER (ORAL) (1 -9—201 1 ) 1. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia the petitioner has challenged the iegality & propriety of the order dated 5.7.2011 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Ambikapur in Civil Suit No.25A/2011, whereby the Judge, Family Court has dismissed the ' application filed by the petitioner wife of the respondent for permission to appoint legal assistance. 2. i have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. perused the order impugned and other documents tiled on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in first round of litigation decree of judicial separation has been passed on 23.1.2008 and thereafter the respondent has tiled petition for divorce. Learned counsel ‘ further submits that the petitioner is not well acquainted in law and in second round of litiation legal assistance for her is necessary. A. Considering the second round of litigation and its complication, if the facility of legal assistance is permitted to the petitioner, then it would not “ C§\ “g- cause any prejudice to the opposite party. The Court may permit the opposite party for legal assistance forjust decision of the case. . Consequently, without observing any procedural law, the writ petition ts allowed to the extent of dismissal of prayer of the petitioner for appointment of legal assistance. The petitioner may appoint legal assistance of her own choice. but it must be ensured that on account of r such legal assistance, trial should not be prolonged. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge