IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15590 of 2008 Date of Decision: October 27, 2009 Rulda Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Ms. G.K. Mann, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. B.S. Jaswal, Advocate, for respondent No.4. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) It has been pointed out by learned counsel for respondent No.4 i.e. Avtar Singh son of Gurmeet Singh that filing of the case is a result of malafide. The petitioner is none other but the grand father of private respondent (No.4). There is civil dispute between the two and litigation between the parties is going on. A complaint had been filed by the petitioner which has already been enquired into CWP No.15590 of 2008 [2] by the BD & PO, Chogawan and also by the officials of Zila Parishad, Amritsar. The allegations levelled by the petitioner were found false. An application is also pending before the Vigilance Department filed by the petitioner. So as to settle civil disputes in relation to family properties, the present petition has been filed. Alongwith the written statement on behalf of the private respondent, copy of the civil suit has also been placed on record. No replication has been filed to indicate that the facts are controverted. I am of the considered opinion that the petitioner is settling his personal scores by way of filing this writ petition, which tantamounts to abuse to process of Court. No ground for interference in writ jurisdiction at the instance of the petitioner is made out. The petition is dismissed with costs Rs.10,000/-. (AJAI LAMBA) October 27, 2009 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?