^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAJURE A.T BILASPUR / W.P.No^'^ of 2003 / 1. LALIT KUMAR AGRAWAL SON OF SHM LAXMI NARAYAN / AGRAWAL, PROPMETOR, M/S. GURUDEV INDUSTRIES, NEVRA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE TILDA NEVRA, DISTMCT-RAIPUR. 2. SMT. BIMLA BAI WIFE OF LAXMI NARAYAN AGRAWAL, ADULT, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE TILDA NEVRA, DISTRICT- RAIPUR. 1. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LAW, JUSTICE AND COMPANY AFFAIRS AND ALSO THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI. 2. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, A BANKING COMPANY CONSTITUTED UNDER THE RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF THE BANKING COMPANIES (ACQUISITION AND TRANSFER OFFICE AT MEDICAL COLLEGE ROAD, RAIPUR !'^y -\'y.'\A^:' .•.'• c.y"^^^?-'"" >°ri^';'ft't:y^ '^••••" ^ y-- •ETITIONERS VERSUS RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FQR THE ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORAM AND/OR ORDERfS), AND/OR DIRECTIONfS) IN THE <TATURE OF WRITS XI-HC-22 •3^"3fpll?Fl, yal^'ic, RK'ii'yy an^r iraqT, ; ; (^^ l^s'l^0^ .<ffq?IT'9PllW"'" """" " ^I^ 3«e- fa<l<ty" ' ^sii^rgii .IS-fyr^SltW^ ^^^ri^;i ^r 'sjfi^a'^giSR^BfN OIVISKWBENCH: &MON'Bl..ESHR ftKHREtDDIN.J. 2^^8fi^—:^;:.,^.^':^;":.^^^ ^ Shrt^B.P.Sharmacyunselforthls ^ Sttri Vinay^ri^SrKStandinff fcr r^pondeht No.1. ^:; ^ ^ ShriShailendraShuldacounsel ',CJ ! ReBUoner. (pounsel (w the Unionoftndja, Fqllowing the deciskmof the Mardia ChemicarLAI. Vs. Union of liidi^ petitipnstanttsdBmissed;; HoweVer,lt1s^madg;clearthat^ taken acfion tinder Secfion 13(4)1 ReconstrucUon of Fjnancial Assets InterestAct, 20Q2 irrsuch^cases ttwou appeals junder Section ^17 of the preseribed therefor, to be counted with Sd/- Chief Justice +14l<-f41-t WH'-S 4 'fe^t iN^SH ^?3rfign 3ii^i W resppndent No.2. S^preme Court in the matter of i (2004 AIRSCW 2541),thevwjt (where a secuted creditor has 1 of the SecuriUsation and ^od Enforcement of Security i|d be open to borrowers fo file Act within the limitation as ^KwAfrom today. ».^\ Sd/- Eakhruddin Judge [^wsa ,:-¥' l]!1i: i