IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.7846 of 2011 Date of Decision : September 12, 2011. Sat Paul Bansal .....Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Surinder Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Monica Chhibbar Sharma, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks re-imbursement of the medical expenses of Rs.4,19,889.24 submitted vide two bills for Rs.2,64,563/- and Rs.1,55,326.24, respectively. The respondents have filed their reply-affidavit candidly stating that some bills were submitted in the office of the District Education Officer, Sangrur which were forwarded to the office of the Chief Medical Officer, Sangrur. After removing the objections raised by the CMO, Sangrur the bills have been examined by the Director, Health, in accordance with the Rules and they have been sanctioned to the extent of Rs.1,10,493/- and Rs.1,37,695, respectively. The sanction has been CWP No.7846 of 2011 [2] accorded on 23.8.2011 and the bills have been submitted to the District Treasury Officer to issue the cheques in favour of the petitioner on 2.9.2011. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondents to issue the cheques to the petitioner within a period of one month. Since the amount sanctioned by the respondents is not at par with the bills submitted by the petitioner, liberty is granted to him to re-submit his claim if he is dissatisfied with the decision taken by the respondents. The petitioner may seek and shall be provided necessary details in this regard and the claim, if any, submitted by the petitioners shall be re- examined in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. September 12, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE