IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NOS.446/1990, 91/1992, 1/1993, 471/1993 & 507/1995 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.77 OF 1990 Jer Ruttan Kavasmaneck & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Gharda Chemicals Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Cyrus Bharucha with Mr.Siddharth Srivastav i/b D.H.Law Associates for Petitioners. Mr.Kumar Desai with Mr.Shehzad,Mr.A.K.Najam-es-Sani i/b Mr.R.A.K.Najam-es-Sani for Respondents 1 & 2. Mr.Sunip K.Sen i/b Mr.R.A.K.Najam-es-Sani for Respondents 3 & 4. Mr.T.N.Subramanian i/b M/s.Rustumji & Ginwala for Respondents 5, 9, 39 to 44. Mr.T.N.Subramanian i/b M/s.Kanga & Co. for Respondents 11, 12 & 37. Mr.T.N.Subramanian i/b M/s.Purnanand & Co. for Respondent No.13. Ms.Alpana Ghone i/b Little & Co. for Respondents 14 to 21. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DECEMBER 12, 2007. DECEMBER 12, 2007. DECEMBER 12, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. As it is agreed that the relief claimed in : 2 : these Applications can be answered at the hearing of the Company Petition, no further orders are required on these Applications. Questions raised in these Applications are left open to be decided at the appropriate stage. 2. Applications disposed of accordingly. 3. Grievance is made on behalf of Respondents 14 to 21 that copy of Company Application No.91 of 1992 has still not been served on the said Respondents. As the Application is disposed of, no further direction is required. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.