IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11456 of 2007 ASHISH KUMAR THAKUR @ ASHISH THAKUR, S/O PRADIP KUMAR THAKUR @ PRADIP THAKUR, R/O VILLAGE/P.O RUPAS PUR KHUDNA, P.S RAUTARA, DISTRICT KATIHAR. ………………………PETITIONER. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY PRIMARY AND ADULT EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT, NEW SECRETARIAT, BAILY ROAD, PATNA 800001. 2.THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KATIHAR. 3.THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, KATIHAR. 4.THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, CHANDWA, PS.RAUTARA. 5.THE HEAD MASTER, PRATHAMIK VIDYALAY, CHANDWA, P.S. RAUTARA, DISTRICT KATIHAR. …………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02/ 19.07.2011 Having heard counsel for the parties, this Court would deem it expedient in the ends of justice to allow the petitioner to approach the District Teachers Appellate Authority which is the appropriate forum for ventilating the grievance relating to any complaint arising out of employment on the post of Panchayat Shikshak. It is not in doubt that the petitioner had already been absorbed as Panchayat Shikshak under Rule-20(iii) of 2006 rules and thereafter if he has been removed from service on any ground whatsoever he will definitely have the remedy before the concerned Authority, which till 2008 was the Block Development Officer and thereafter the same has been vested in the Authority. Considering all these aspects, this 2 Court would give liberty to the petitioner to approach the tribunal within a period of one month from today, and if such complaint is filed by the petitioner, the tribunal shall decide the question on merits without going into the question of limitation, inasmuch as, this writ application has remained pending in this Court from 03.09.2007. It is expected that the Appellate Authority, the tribunal, shall dispose of the matter within a period of six months from the date of filing of such complaint/representation by the petitioner. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is disposed of. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J)