IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5484 of 2011 KRISHNA RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 02.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Sheosagar P.S. Case no. 104/2010 was registered under section 302/34 of the IPC against unknown persons on the basis of fardbeyan of the informant- Panpati Devi who happens to be wife of the deceased. The aforesaid farbeyan was recorded in presence of one Chattu Paswan who happens to be son of the deceased. It appears from perusal of the case diary as well as submissions of the parties that after one month of the alleged occurrence, above stated Chattu Paswan disclosed the name of the petitioner and stated that he came to know about involvement of the petitioner from the villagers. Although in course of investigation some witnesses also stated about the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime but admittedly, the aforesaid witnesses are not eye witnesses of the alleged occurrence rather they appear to be hearsay witnesses. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties let the petitioner, Krishna Ram, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the District and Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in Sessions Trial no. 463/2010 arising out of Sheosagar P.S. Case no.104/2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)