IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19301 of 2010 SANJAY SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 27.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail in a case registered under Sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 471/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that in a raid one Pappu Khan @ Aftab Khan was apprehended and he disclosed that Santosh Kumar and Suresh Kumar indulge in the sale and purchase of stolen vehicle and the name of the petitioner was also disclosed who used to assist these people in getting the forged document prepared for the stolen vehicle. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the name of the petitioner sprang up on the statement of co accused and no recovery has been made from the petitioner either of stolen vehicle or of any document and petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph 16 of the present petition. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the name of the petitioner sprang up on the statement of co accused. 2 Considering the facts that petitioner’s name sprang up on the statement of co accused, there is no recovery from the petitioner and petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner namely Sanjay Singh, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 30 of 2010. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)