IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10446 OF 2009 DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 04, 2010 Naresh Kumar .....Petitioner VERSUS Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate for Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State. Mr. P. K. Ganga, Advocate, for respondent No.4. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner states that there will be dispute in regard to the facts, which appropriately can be resolved by filing a civil suit. He accordingly seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition to have his alternative remedy of filing a civil suit. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. However, this shall not be a ground not to consider the objections in regard to delay or other pleas available to the respondents to raise in this case. October 04, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE