IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 765 of 1989 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KSHITIJ R.VYAS ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- DEVJIBHAI KANJIBHAI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 765 of 1989 MR YOGESH S LAKHANI for Petitioner No. 1-2 MR HL JANI,AGP for Respondent No. 1 MR JR NANAVATI for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KSHITIJ R.VYAS Date of decision: 10/02/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT Learned Counsel Mr.J.R.Nanavati states that in view of the final award of the Industrial Tribunal, the services of the petitioners are regularised and the petitioners are treated as regular permanent employees of respondent no.2 Municipality. The learned advocate for the petitioner has no instructions in the matter. In any case, in view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the respondent no.2 Municipality, this petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Liberty to revive in case of difficulty. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. (Kshitij R.Vyas,J.) [sonar]