me La$ BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATn‘SGARH) G‘9&*f W.P. (C) No. PETITIONER / Q9 12010 M/s. SAV Steel Pvt. Ltd. a Private Limited Company registered under companies Act, Light lndustriai Area Bhiiai, Durg Chhattisgarh, through- it’s Manager namely Prakash Nahata, S/o Late Shri C.S. Nahata, aged about 40 years, R/o Unit-2, 129 Light Industriai Area Bhilai, DurgVChhattisgarh. VERSUS RESPONDENTS / 1. 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Home Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Superintendent of Police, District Durg Chhattisgarh. Ll'own Inspector, Police Station Jamul, Bhilai Durg Chhattisgarh. 3. 4. l'r‘ .,, (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh \ Through Secretary Industry @ / 5. Punjab National Bank, Through its Manager Civic Centre Branch, Bhilai Durg Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 0% THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA /, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 6751 OF 2010 M/s. SAV Steel Pvt. Ltd. Petitioner Versus Resnondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB :Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotti, J.) Present :- Shri T.K.Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State/ respondents No. 1 to 4. ORDER ORAL (Passed on G3 day of December, 201 O} 1. The petitioner seems to be aggrieved by non~action on the part of the respondent authorities in his application seeking protection from anti—social elements before the premises of the petitioner. 2. Shri Bhatia, learned Dy. Govt. Advocate appearing for the Statélrespondents submits that if a fresh application is made by the petitioner, the same shall be examined and appropriate steps shall be taken, in accordance with law. 3. ln view of foregoing, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing remains for adjudication in this matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/— .. Satish K. Agnihotri : Judge ashok //,