HTGH COI.TRT OF CmiATTySGARH AT BII.ASPITR. PETITIONERS Wi-it Petiiioii No. 472u of2005 1. Rekh lal .Sahii S/o Saitu Ram Sahii, aged aboirt-23 5^ears Sanibida Sliikshak Frimaiy Scliool Surajpura, R/o village K05daty, Tahsil Kawardha., aad Distt. Kabirdham. 2. Santosh Kumar Janghel, S/o Itwari Ram Jangliel, aged about 33 5^earf?, Sambida. Shikshak Priman/ School,, Sighanpuri, Th. Kawardha, District Kabirdhani. 3. Bed Ram Sabit S/o Madan Singh^ aged about 23 ^^ears^ Sambida Shiksiiak Piimary School Sonsary P.0. Koiyari Tahsi! Kawardha, Di^tt. Kabirdham. VERSUS MESPONDEM'l'S L Mukhya Kaiya Palan Adhikari, Jaiipad Panchayat Sahaspur Lohara Tahsil Kawardba^ District Kabirdham. 2. Block. Eclucation Officer Sahaspur Lohara Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham. 3. Distt. Education Officer Kabii'dham, Talusil Kawardha, District Kabirdham. 4. Collector Kabirdham, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham. 5. Mukliya Karya Palan Adhikari, Jila Paiiohayat Kabirdhaiii Tahsil Kawardha, Disfcrict Kabirdham. 6. State of Cbiiatli^garh tlirough Secretar}^ Paiichayat and Gi'amm Vikas Vibhag, Dau Kalyan Sin^i Bhawati, ^^antralava- Raimir.. (WRIl PETIIION UNDER ARHCLE 226/227 OF IHE CONS 1 ITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'Me Mr, Satisi^ K. AgiiiJio^. X) Pre^ent ' Shri Dinesh R.;K. Tiwar^ Advoc^te fbr tl'te p€ititioners. Shri Y.S.'Thakur., Depuly Advocate Geiieral fbrlli^ State. ORAI,ORRER 75T 1 1. (Passed ox»tius 24ul uav urApri!, 2008) With the con^ent ofthe parties, the matter is takeii up fbr hearmg finally. Leamed couii^el appearmg for the petitioiiers siibmits fhat the petitioners do not want to contest the matter 011 merit. However, the petitioiiers pray for liberty to make representation befbre the authorities eoncemed, seeking compliance ofthe orders dated 16.03.2005 and 23.04.2005 (Amiexiire P/6 & P/7)^ passed by the State Govemment- Shri Y.8. Thakiir, leam^d counsel appeariiig for the State submits that m the eveiit^ 8 repre^eiitatioii is iii^..di?^ thc' E^^.II:I€ shall bc coii^id^rcd io ^ccordaiice wi^h law 011 its o^^wi meril. ~ Sahu In view of the foregoing, this petitioii is disposed of with a. direction to the respo!idei?t authorities to consider the representation,. if any, filed by the petiti<^iers, on its O^NII m^rit, in accordance with law, as eariy as possible. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge