IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.H.S. ANSARI WRIT PETITION No.17348 of 1994 Between: P.Raghavendra Prasad, S/o. P.Ranga Rao. Tenali. ..... PETITIONER AND 1.The Food Corporation of India, rep. by its Chairman & Managing Director, 16-20 Bara Kamba Lane, New Delhi. 2.Executive Director (Personnel), Food Corporation of India, rep. by its Chairman & Managing Director, 16-20, Bara Kamba Lane, New Delhi. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not issuing the interview call letters to the petitioner for appointment to the post of Deputy Manager (Genl. Admn.) as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents to issue call letter to the petitioner for appearing before the Selection Boards and appoint the petitioner to the post of Deputy Manager (Genl.Admn.) in the event of selection. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.G.VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondents: Mr.N.V.SURYANARAYANA MURTHY The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: It is represented that by afflux of time and subsequent events, the writ petition is rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. ______________________ (M.H.S.ANSARI, J.) 17th February 2005. ARS To 1.The Chairman & Managing Director, Food Corporation of India, 16-20 Bara Kamba Lane, New Delhi. 2.The Executive Director (Personnel), Food Corporation of India, 16-20, Bara Kamba Lane, New Delhi. 3. Two CD copies.