IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50048 of 2008 1.KRISHNA MAHTO SON OF MARAI MAHTO 2.SUMITRA DEVI @ SAVITRI DEVI WIFE OF KRISHNA MAHTO 3.ANAND MAHTO SON OF KRISHNA MAHTO ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RISAURA,P.S.MAHARAJGANJ,DISTRICT SIWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.51670 of 2008 1.LAL BAHADUR MAHTO @ LAL BAHADUR SON OF MARAI MAHTO 2.SOMARO DEVI WIFE OF SRI LAL BAHADUR MAHTO BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RISAURA,P.S.MAHARAJGANJ,DISTRICT SIWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 20.4.2009 Since both the above applications arise out of one and the same police case, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners are named accused of a case which has been registered for offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Informant’s sister Malti Devi was seen lying in burn condition in her house. She was alive and petitioners were present there. The informant was asked by accused petitioner Anand Mahto to accompany on his motorcycle to bring the medicine. Deliberately , a delay was made in purchasing the medicine and the informant’s sister, in the meantime, who was married 12 years earlier having two issues, died. Submission is that the informant has not seen the occurrence and he is not own brother of the deceased. In fact, he was having some illicit relationship with the deceased and that is why the deceased was not willing to live in the house of her husband. Considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners of both the applications be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in Maharajganj P.S.Case No. 68 of 2008. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)