IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35472 of 2010 AJAY RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 08.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. At the very outset, Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the informant has compromised this case when she came to know about the real facts. He further submitted that after due investigation, police submitted charge sheet under sections- 498A and 365 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is husband of the deceased and there is allegation that he alongwith other accused committed the murder of deceased on account of non-fulfillment of illegal dowry demand. So I am unable to understand as to how the police submitted charge sheet under section 365 of the Indian Penal Code. Moreover, when the compromise has already been taken place in between the parties, in my view, a lenient view may be taken against the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions of the parties, the petitioner, namely, Ajay Ram is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in 2 connection with Koilwar P.S. Case No. 69 of 2008 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara subject to condition that before releasing the petitioner, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur shall verify the genuineness of compromise petition dated 15.02.2010 filed in his court and if the aforesaid compromise petition is found genuine, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate shall release the petitioner on bail as stated above. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)