IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29702 of 2010 1. MUKESH PANDEY. 2. Ajay Pandey. Both are sons of Late Tanik Pandey. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 06.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 452, 337, 338, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Considering that while the petitioner was on bail after having been convicted in a case instituted under Section 307 IPC he committed the present occurrence, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner since he has misused the privilege of bail. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it within a reasonable time. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)