5 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l W.PJS)J?o. <^0^> of 2011 PETITIONER \^^r L^ Y ^ o<a;.-fsy -^>>- Smt. Deshmati Dhangad, aged about 50 W/o Late Shri C.L. Dhangad, R/o Rajasva Colony, New Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) sff('^ ^^-' VERSUS RESPONDENTS / 1. State of Chhattisgarh : Through Secretary, Administrative/Revenue Department, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) / 2. The Collector, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Deputy Collector, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) /4" Accountant General, Chhattisgarh, General Provident Fund Office, Raipur (C.G.) ^s. Joint Director, Treasury, Account 8s Pension, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER :- As stated above in cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS :- As stated above in cause title. 3. PARTICULARS OF THE ORDER, AGAINST. WHICH THIS PETITION IS MADE:- SUBJECT MATTER IN BRIEF 3f HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR PETiTIONER RESPONDENTS IT PETiTiON iS) No. 905 of 2011 Smt. Deshmati Dhanaad VERSUS ^ ^t^^i|^^,4*tlscl.^lfl^lM»^ 3!. /^nr' ISie OT 'iufHHSTEISQSm cSt \JIH^I!" WRiT PETITiON UNDER ARTiCLE 226 OF Tl-E COKlSTiTUTiON-OEjND^ I: Hon'bie Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. Present: Shri Bharat Rajput, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyerforthe State. 2. l-'3'^iy^ a\ (Passed on 14~" day of February, 2011) Learned counsei aopearins for ihe c-etitioner submits thaf the case. being Davment of refiral beneflts matter, mav be referred to the penslon comsTiittee. : This Court, in the ma&er of W.P. No. 4S42/2004 (Bai]nafh Kfiandal v. The State of Chhattisciarh & Otherss and other connected matters. directed the Comrnittee to consider she matter of retlra! dues as the disputed question of facts wsre invoived. The Comfnittee was t^1^£'^ -^ ^**lTi rfrf^'^'V^i ih-b^t/^ Hff,'^' 3^3 J ?-<^ 1 5-"?V*','5r •^/^ ^1!^^'! ^^^•^Jr^^.3" ^ i*-^-F j'^ ^•^ COH^JIUl^Q 0V £Ha5 i3?.s'£8 ksQy^fHETISH^ pUfSUSH^. SO IH^ Of09f G8ISG 19.0e.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/20)6 (Smt. Keja Bal Chandraksr v. Stats Gssvemment and others} and order cated it n' 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of ChhattisQarh & Others v. Basjnath Mandat and another). Thus, this petition 13 squa.'ely covered by the judgment.and order datsd 31'" of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4842/2004 (swra, as subrnlted by iearned counse! appearing for the parties. T'hls pet'tion Is accordingiy djsposed of ;n the same terms i.e. the office of the Advocafe Genei'a! ia diracted to send the case fo ths Comminee. within a oerlod of 15 dsvs from the.date of recsipt of a copy ofthe petition from th®petitloner and this order. Thereafter, the '3 ^^ n ) Committee shsil issue notice to the pst'tjoner and the off'cers concerned; within a further perloa of 15 days. Th©Committee sha'S consicier and pass order, in accordancs with iaw, after affOKiiriC proper opportunlty of hearing to ffte petitioner. The petiiioner and the officers concerned mav fite additions! documents. jf necesssrv. The entire exerciss, inciudjng psyment of retiraj dues; Jf any, to the petitionsr be compSsted wjthin a oeriod of slx weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shaii suppiy extra copy of the petition to the Searr'ed counsei apoearing for the i'esDondents for fcrwardins the seme to the Committee. Sd//- Prashant Kuniar Mishra Judge -i- Uf'