THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition Nos.4019 of 2011 and 32840 of 2010 COMMON ORDER: The issue involved in these writ petitions is common. Hence, they are disposed of through a common order. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to, as arrayed in W.P.No.32840 of 2010. The petitioner is a resident of premises bearing No.3-9-643, Sainadh Colony, Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad. Alleging that the 3rd respondent encroached into an extent of 10 feet upon the 20 feet road, that exists nearby the house of the petitioner, she submitted a representation to the Municipal Corporation, the respondents 1 and 2 herein. She filed W.P.No.13502 of 2009 complaining that the Corporation did not take any steps. The writ petition was disposed of, on 08-07-2009, directing the Corporation to consider the representation of the petitioner. It is stated that, in compliance with the said direction, the Corporation removed the unauthorized constructions, including iron gate, laid by the 3rd respondent. The petitioner submitted a representation dated 02-09-2010 to the Corporation, stating that the 3rd respondent has made construction by encroaching the road, once again. She seeks a direction against the Corporation to remove the encroachments, said to have been made by the 3rd respondent. The 3rd respondent filed a representation to the Corporation on 11-06-2009, stating that he has no objection for laying of C.C road, and to avoid frequent visit of the officials to the place, in the name of removal of encroachments, W.P.No.4019 of 2011 is filed by him, for appropriate directions. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the Municipal Corporation and learned counsel for the 3rd respondent. The Corporation found that the 3rd respondent has encroached into a portion of the road in the locality. It is stated that the encroached portion has been removed. It is the obligation of the Corporation to ensure that no public road is encroached by anyone. If the allegation, that the 3rd respondent has once again encroached upon the road; is true, it is a serious matter. It cannot remain oblivious, after removing the encroachments, and it must be ensured that similar instances do not recur. Hence, the writ petitions are disposed of, directing that the respondents 1 and 2 shall remove all the encroachments, that exist on the road, nearby the house of the petitioner, whether the encroachment is made by the petitioner, the 3rd respondent, or even by any other person; and ensure that the road is not encroached by anyone. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.28-02-2011. KO