WP(C) 3034/2006 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA As was recorded in the order dated 24.03.2010, the writ petition is not maintainable in view of the provision of Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 and t he law laid down by the Apex Court in L. Chandrakumar vs. Union of India reporte d in (1997) 3 SCC 261. None appears for the petitioner. I have heard Mr. J. Singh, learned Sr. counsel and Standing counsel for the Railways who submits that the petitioner be ing an employee of the Central Govt. (Railways) as per provision of the aforesai d Act, he is required to agitate his grievance, if any, in the Jurisdictional Ce ntral Administrative Tribunal. The grievance of the petitioner is pertaining to the disability leave fo r the period from 08.10.04 to 16.11.06. The petitioner is a railway employee and working in the capacity of Head Clerk in the office of the Chief Commercial Man ager, Rate Branch, Maligaon, Guwahati. In view of the above, the writ petition is not maintainable and accordin gly it is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach jurisdictio nal Central Administrative Tribunal agitating his grievance. The writ petition is disposed of.