?..%. J •! ..-",cif!ra HIGH C»URTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER8 RESPONDENTS WritPdttttonNo.l^6gf2g01 1. D.R. Dhmv, S/o Late Bhukharmi Dhrov, ayed about 50 years, R/o Imgation Colony Chakradhar Nagar Raigarh, occupation Clerk (Asstt. Giade HI) Water Resources Department, Raigarb. 2. M.L. Rathiya, S/o Late Shri Pa&mlal Rathiya, aged about 46 years, R/o Imgation Colony^ Chakradhar Nagar, occupation Clerk (Asst. Grade III) Water Resources DqMrtmenl, Raigarh. VER8U8 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Engineer in Chief, Water Resources Deptt. Raipur. 2. Chief Engineer, Hasdeo KacUhar, Water Resawees Department, Bilaspur (CG). 3. Superintending Engineer, Water Resomces Dqiartmsnt Bilaspur(CG). 4. Executive Engineer,, Water Resources Department, Raigarh (CG). (WRTT PETHION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSHTUTICaSf OF D®IA) (SB: Hun'bte Mr. S^shK. AenaotrtJ.) Present : ShriAwBdhTripathi.Advocateforthepetitioners. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer fortiie St^e/respondents. (MtALORDER (PasseA on 1" day ofjuly, 2<N») With the consent of the partfes, the matter is taken up for heamg i finally. 1. tsamed counsel appearing for the petiticmers submite 1hat fte petitioners have passed Hindi Typing Examination, as required for promotion. He fiirther submits that this matter is squarely covefed by judgment passed in Malyadeen Verma Vs. State rfM.P. (1991 MPST 379). Thus, the petitioners seek liberty of this Court fo make representetion alongwith a copy of the order as stated above, to tihe conceraed autfiority, for consideration oftheir case. Sgi 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the State submits that ifa representation is made, the same shall be cohsidered, in aceordance wiA law,as early as possible, preferably within a period ofei^it iweks fiom the date of receipt ofrepresentation. 3. For the reasons mentioned hereinabo\fle, the petition sten<fedisposed of witii the abovestated Uberty. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agiiihotri, Judge Sahu