IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP-T No.: 2744 of 2008. Decided on: 29.04.2011. _____________________________________________________ Hans Raj Thakur and others. … Petitioners. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners : Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate for respondent No.3. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral). It is not in dispute that the present lis is covered by the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.1171 of 2005 titled as State of H.P. and another versus Narinder Dutt Sharma and others, dated 11th August, 2008. 2. Consequently, the present petition is allowed with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - in view of the principles of law laid down in the judgment cited hereinabove, within a period of six weeks after the production of certified copy of this judgment. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. April 29, 2011. (sck).