IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 4138 of 2008. Decided on: 25.08.2010. __________________________________________________________ D.P. Mohil. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate vice Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondent No.1. None for respondents No.2 to 53. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate appearing vice Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner submits that his client is not imparting instructions to him. Consequently, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution subject to revival by moving appropriate application. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 25, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?