W HIGH OURT O CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR ' W.P. (S! No.689 l 2007 Laxmjn Bai, aged about 60 ysars, daughter of Ishwar, working as Gangan, Public rks Department, Sakti, Malkharaud, Chhapora Marg, Sakti, Distt. Janjgir Champa (CG) Versus RESPONDENTS t , 1. Sate of Chhattisgarh m ) Through z The Secretmy, Public Works Departent, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G. 2. The Sub Divisional Omcer, Public Works Deparunent, Sakti, Distt. Janjgir Champa (C.G). Sbn' Abhijeet Sarkar, Counsel for the petioner. ri N.K. Agrawal, Senior Advocate and Deputy Advocate State] General resndents. with Shn' A.S. Kachhwaha, Govt. Advocate for the SUNIL KUMAR SINHA J. 31.10.2007) Heard. Learned cnsel for the petitioner submts that a permanent Gang-man is to be retired at the age of 62 year in accordance With' the Chhatlisgafh Shaskiya Sevak [Adhivarshiki—Ayu) Adhz'nz'yam 1967 read with Fundamental Rules, 56. He also submits that the point raised has been decided by this Court in batch of matters i.e. WP. No. 108/ 2005 and many other connected matters on 04.01.2007, reported in 2007 [2g C.G.L.J. 29 (Govind & Others vs. State at C.G. and others) and this matter is squarely covered by that decision, which may be disposed of on the same terms. f C F PETITIONER m Wo WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Apgearance: ti Sh po ORAL ORDER ( ou i s W.P. (S) No. Leamed counsel for the State fairly agrecs that this matter is covered by the said decision. However, he submits that in some matters the State has filed writ appeals. Unless some inten‘m onier is passed, merely on account of Wing of the wm't appeal, hearing of this writ petition cannot be kept in abeyance, when the matter 1's squarely covered by the said judgment. In the Iesult, this petition is allowed. It is disposed of in terms of the order dated 04.01.2007 passed in WP. No.108j2005 and other connected matters. No Wt A l \ i i \ t order as to cost. Sunil Kumar Sinha