1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1137 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1100 OF 2004. (STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. VS. SUBHASH G. NIMBEKAR & ANR.) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____ Shri S.J.Jichkar, A.G.P. for Applicant. Shri G.G.Mishra, Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri P.D.Meghe, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : K.J.ROHEE AND R.C.CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 12, 2007. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Paragraph No.2 of the order itself shows that the petitioner prayed for direction to the respondent to consider his claim for appointment as nominee of the freedom fighter against Class-III and Class-IV posts. However, in the operative part of the order a direction was given to respondent No.2 to appoint the petitioner on Class-III or Class-IV post in the category reserved for freedom fighter. In fact, it was never prayed for by the petitioner himself. 2 Thus, there is error apparent on the face of the record. 3. Hence, we propose to review the order, by directing the respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner for being appointed on Class-III or Class-IV post in the category reserved for freedom fighter. 4. The application is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE. JUDGE. RR.