IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14595 of 2010 SACHIDANAND SARASWATI @ PAPPU JHA & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 21.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. In this renewed prayer for bail under Sections 302, 147, 149, 323, 341, 324, 346, 201 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, even though the petitioners are right in their submission that the recording in the earlier order that petitioner no.2 was an assailant was an error of record, who is otherwise Nunu Jha, makes no difference to the conclusion as the informant is an eye witness, who claims to have escaped during the firing naming the petitioners as members of an unlawful assembly, some of whom fired, killing the deceased. The application is rejected. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)