IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No. 173 of 1998 Decided on : May 10, 2010 State of H.P. and others …Appellant Versus Saikloo …Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Appellant: Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. For the Respondent: Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Charu Gupta, Advocate. Surjit Singh, Judge (oral) Issues raised in the present appeal are similar to the ones raised in connected appeal RSA No.171 of 1998. Both these appeals were ordered to be heard together. Appeal RSA No.171 of 1998 has been disposed of today. 2. In view of the judgment delivered in aforesaid RSA No.171 of 1998, a copy of which shall be placed on the record of this case, present appeal is accepted and impugned judgment and decree of the first appellate Court are set aside. However, in view of the finding that the order of ejectment Ext. PW1/A, passed by the Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? …2… Assistant Collector, under Section 163 of the H.P. Land Revenue Act, is illegal and without jurisdiction, a decree for permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the appellant-State and its functionaries from dispossessing the respondent-plaintiff from the suit land, except by due process of law, is passed in favour of the respondent-plaintiff and against the appellants- defendants. Appeal stands disposed of accordingly. May 10, 2010(ss) (Surjit Singh), J