IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8006 of 2011 ANGAD YADAV AND ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04/ 16.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State assisted by the learned counsel for the informant. Allegedly, petitioners being armed with fire arms came at the Baithka of the informant and made indiscriminate firings as a result of which informant’s brother as well as his sister-in-law died then and there. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is specific allegation of making firing against Hiraganj Yadav and so far as the petitioners are concerned, omnibus allegation has been levelled against them and having considered the aforesaid circumstances, another bench of this court vide order dated 25.11.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 39261/2010 and other cases have already been granted bail to co-accused Dharmdeo @ Dharam Yadav and others. On the other hand, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the informant point out that in course of investigation some witnesses have specifically stated that petitioners no. 3, 4 and 5 had also fired at the deceased. So far as petitioners no.1 and 2 are concerned, learned Addl. P. P fairly conceded this fact that their case stands on similar footing to that of co-accused persons who have already been granted privilege of bail. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners, 2 no. 1 and 2, namely, Angad Yadav and Anil Yadav, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in Bakhri P.S. Case no. 67/2010. So far as prayer for bail of petitioners no.3, 4 and 5, namely, Wakil Yadav, Kailash Yadav and Amitabh Bachan @ Amita Bachchan @ Amitabh Bachhan Yadav is concerned, their prayer for bail stands rejected. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)