6 3mm. Rm“ G) WI, W ' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATIISGARH AT BILAsPUR .G w.P. s No. 9 2011 K Dharam Lal Divya, aged about 55 years, S/o Shri Heeram Ram Divya, Head Master, Government Primary School Mekri, Block Pamgarh, Distt. Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Th rough Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Public Instructions, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Block Pamgarh, Distt.Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA Jim A PETITIONER HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR, (Writ Petition under AItiCIe 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. resent :- Shri K.S. Pawar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushi! Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the State. Gowri ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 3' day of February, 201 1) Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner and provide benefit of FR 22 (D) of the Chhattisgarh Fundamentai Rules for grant of increments, as provided under the rules and also to pay arrears from the date when it became due. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the identical matter has already been considered and decided by this Court vide order dated 27-3-2008 ‘in W.P. (S) No.4991 of 2006 and the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the said decision. Learned counsel appearing for the State does not dispute that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P. (S) No.4991 of 2006. Learned counsel further submits that if the petitioner tiles fresh representation before the concerned authorities for the reliefs, which he has ciaimed by way of this petition, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, subject to verification of facts. For the foregoing reasons, the instant petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representatio‘n before the respondent authorities raising all of his grievances raised in'this petition and on such representation being made, the respondent authorities shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law and on its own merits, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation. w ~xa’“”’i Sdl- Satish K- Agm 'hotl‘i Judge \ / P WRIT PETITION (S) NO.650 OF 2011 PETlTlONER Dharam Lal Divya Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others