IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 157 of 2008 AND WRIT PETITION No. 1218 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 28/01/2008 in WP NO : 1218 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Smt.K. Andalamma W/o.Late Venkateswara Rao R/o..No. 23-56/B, Netajinagar, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The Joint Collector, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Suryapet, Nalgonda District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Suryapet Mandal, Suryapet Town, Nalgonda District. 4 Aleti Poolamma W/o. Aleti Shankaraiah R/o. H.No. Backside Road of Vijetha Hotel, Suryapet, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.M.V.BHARATI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per RSR, J) Though this writ appeal is directed against an interlocutory order, it is represented by the learned Advocates appearing for the parties that during the pendency of this appeal, there was a compromise between the appellant and the 4th respondent and they have also ﬁled a petition to that eﬀect in W.A.M.P.No.1644 of 2008. In view of the same, they have requested for the disposal of the writ appeal as well as the writ petition. The 4th respondent was the applicant before the 3rd respondent-Mandal Revenue Oﬃcer. On the said application, the 3rd respondent had issued certiﬁcate in form 13-B of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (for short ‘the Act’) for regularization of sale deeds for an extent of Ac.13-17 guntas covered by Sy.Nos. 174/E, 177/A, 179/A, 180/A and 187/A of B.Madharam Village, Suryapet Mandal, Nalgonda District. Aggrieved by the said order of the 3rd respondent-Mandal Revenue Oﬃcer, the 4 th respondent- original petitioner carried the matter in revision before the 1st respondent-Joint Collector. The 1st respondent-Joint Collector vide his order dated 10-12-2007 conﬁrmed the order passed by the 3rd respondent-Mandal Revenue Oﬃcer. Being aggrieved by the said order of the 1st respondent, the 4th respondent- original petitioner has filed the writ petition. Now in the aﬃdavit ﬁled in support of W.A.M.P.No. 1644 of 2008, it is stated that there is a settlement between the appellant and the 4th respondent and as per the said settlement the 4th respondent has given up her right and claim in the land covered by Sy.No. 180/A, admeasuring Ac.1-17 guntas situated in B.Madharam Villave, Suryapet Mandal, Nalgonda Disdtrict and the other extents of land covered by Sy.Nos. 174/E, 177/A, 179/A and 187/A shall remain in favour of the 4th respondent. In view of the terms of compromise arrived at between the appellant and the 4th respondent as contained in the aﬃdavit ﬁled in support of W.P.M.P.No.1644 of 2008 which is also attested by the learned Advocates appearing for the parties, the writ appeal as well as the writ petition are disposed of in terms of the compromise and the Form-13-B certiﬁcate issued in favour of the 4th respondent stands conﬁrmed except to the extent of land covered by Sy.No.180/A, admeasuring Ac. 1-17 guntas situated at B.Madharam Village, Suryapet, Mandal, Nalgonda District. Subject to the above, the writ appeal and the writ petition are disposed of with no order as to costs. ______________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 30th July, 2008. _________________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J GRR