IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18317 of 2011 Sangeeta Gupta W/O Jitendra Gupta R/O Village- Saria, Ward No.1, Post- Katya, Police Station- Katya, District- Gopalganj Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 3. The District Magistrate, Gopalganj 4. The Child Development Project Officer, Katya, Gopalganj 5. The District Welfare Officer, Gopalganj 6. The District Programme Officer, Gopalganj 7. The Ward Commissioner, Ward No.1, Katya, Gopalganj ----------- 02. 25.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Since the finding given by the District Magistrate is that the whole exercise for selection on the post of Anganbari Sevika was vitiated due to fraud and manipulation, merely because the effect of the order would be ouster of the selected candidate, it does not mean that petitioner should step into her shoes. If it was a case of the said selected candidate suffering from any individual disqualification, there could have been an occasion for this Court to give a direction. But, if the selection process by itself stands vitiated for the reasons indicated in the said order, the correct recourse would be to hold a fresh exercise for selection and not appoint this petitioner in place of the selected candidate. No interference is warranted with the direction of the District Magistrate. Writ is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)