THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.565 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner approached this Court by filing Writ Petition No.3325 of 2006 with a prayer to direct the respondents therein to produce the record relating to the proceedings, dated 11.01.2005 and to set aside the same, as being illegal and arbitrary. The said proceedings relate to absorption to the aided post. After hearing both the parties, the writ petition was disposed of through order, dated 25.06.2008 granting four (4) weeks time to the petitioner to workout her remedies and the second respondent was directed to entertain the appeal, without raising any objection as to the limitation, if it is presented within four (4) weeks. It was also observed that the second respondent shall endeavour to dispose of the appeal, within four (4) weeks from the date of its presentation. This contempt case is filed alleging that though appeal was presented, as directed by this Court, the respondent herein did not take any steps to dispose of the same. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. It is, no doubt, true that there is some delay on the part of the respondent in disposing of the appeal filed by the petitioner. The fact, however, remains that the appellate authority passed an order, dated 05.06.2009 subsequent to the filing of the contempt case. In case the petitioner feels aggrieved by the said order, she has to work out her remedies before appropriate forum. The contempt case is accordingly, closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out her remedies against order, dated 05.06.2009. _________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J 21st AUGUST, 2009. kvni