IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26634 of 2008 BIRIND @ BIRIND KUMAR @ PAPPU KUMAR & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 22/09/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners are accused of a case which has been registered under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Case diary has come and according to the case diary test identification parade has been conducted and the petitioners have been identified by a witness namely the informant. Considering the above facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioners are at liberty to renew their prayer for bail in the court below after completion of one year in custody. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)