1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 8474 of 2011-H Decided on: 21.10.2011. Dev Raj ....Petitioner Versus H.R.T.C & Ors. …Respondents The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Vats, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “ (i) the respondents may be directed not to treat the period of 315 days i.e. w.e.f 17.04.1995 to 26.02.1996 as dies non. (ii) To quashed the impugned order dated 12-9-1996 Annexure P-4 being arbitrary, illegal and malafide. That the respondents may further be directed not to treat the aforementioned period as break in service for all intents and purposes.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted representation, Annexure P-2 and the 2 same may be directed to be considered. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for respondents No. 2 and 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and take appropriate action in accordance with law on Annexure P-2, if not already taken, within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. October 21, 2011 (Justice Surinder Singh), (hl/priti) Judge.