*1* cas.918.10 skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 918 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL 620 OF 2004 Laxman Dhaku Vast through his legal heirs 1(a) Shri Rajan Laxman Vast & Ors. ..Applicants -Versus- Kashiram @ Kashinath Dhaku Vast & Ors. ..Respondents .......... Mr.Rahul P. Walvekar i/by D.S.Sawant for the Applicants. None for the Respondents. .......... CORAM : K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 7TH FEBRUARY 2011. P.C. 1 Heard Mr.Rahul Walvekar for the applicants. 2 This civil application is preferred by original defendants for issuing fresh notice to respondent no.20-Appa Krishna Khot. The learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the notice issued to respondent no.19B returned unserved with bailiff’s report “Not residing at given address”. 3 Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants and the averments made in the civil application, the civil *2* cas.918.10 application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b), which reads as under : “(b) That the fresh notice be kindly issued to Respondent No.20 at the following address : “Shri Appa Krishna Khot, At : Revtale, Post : Malwan, Tal. Malwan, Dist. Sindhudurg.” 3 Notice returnable on 2nd May 2011. 4 The civil application is disposed off. ( K.K. TATED, J.)