IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47936 of 2008 SAKKO DAS @ SIKANDAR DAS @ SIKKO DAS …. PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …. OPP. PARTY ----------- 2. 4.12.2008 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary corrections in the name of the petitioner. Heard Sri Pravin Kumar Sinha, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri D. Mehta, APP for the State. The absence is of about three years, the petitioner absented from the trial court on 3.11.2004. On commitment of the case the petitioner remained in attendance before the court below up till that date. The petitioner’s absence resulted in an order under Section 299 Cr. P.C. and pursuant thereto the petitioner was arrested and has been produced before the court below on 15.1.2008. The contention is that the circumstances in the life of the petitioner of poverty and need forced him to go out side the State for earning livelihood and co-accused or the pairvikar dumped the trust of the petitioner only. Regard being had to the contentions and the events indicated above, let petitioner Sakka Das @ Sikandar Das @ Sikko Das be released from custody on furnishing a bond - 2 - of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur in connection with Sessions Trial No. 659 of 1998/ 252 of 1999 arising out of Sabour P.S. Case No. 233 of 1996. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)