bsb IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 1539 OF 2008 PETITION (ST) NO. 1539 OF 2008 PETITION (ST) NO. 1539 OF 2008 IN IN IN CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2125 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 2125 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 2125 OF 2007 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 6022 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 6022 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 6022 OF 2002 The President/Secretary, Gramin Shikshan Sanstha C/o. English High School & Jr. College & ors. ... Petitioners v/s Rajendra Vasant Zope & ors. ... Respondents Mr.R.S.Apte i/by V.P.Patankar for the petitioners. Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar for the respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 26TH MARCH, 2008. 26TH MARCH, 2008. 26TH MARCH, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. The review petition has been filed contending that respondent No.2 in the petition was deleted from the array of parties before the order was passed and, therefore, no order ought to have been passed against the institution. The second ground for review is that the Government has issued letters dated 3.12.2007 and 1.1.2008 indicating that it is not liable to make payment of the salary. According to the learned counsel, this is a wrong interpretation of my order 2 dated 11.10.2007. 2. No grounds for review have been made out. The order does not direct respondent No.2 to make payment. The wrong interpretation by the Government of my order is not a ground for review. 3. Hence, review petition rejected. 4. The dismissal of the review petition does not preclude the management or the College from challenging the aforesaid letters. (SMT.NISHITA (SMT.NISHITA (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) MHATRE, J.) MHATRE, J.)