IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.17859 of 2007 Between: Smt. Durga Vanaja Kishore … Petitioner And The Director General of Police, Govt., of A.P., Hyderabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: None Counsel for respondents 1-4: AGP for Home Counsel for respondents 5&6: Sri G. Mohan Rao The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.17859 of 2007 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to direct respondent No.1 to entrust investigation of Crime No.57 of 2006 to either CBCID or CBI. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. Respondent No.3 filed a counter affidavit, wherein it is inter alia stated that during the investigation, the investigating officer recorded the statement of the petitioner and other witnesses apart from collecting copies of documents, that the investigation discloses that the petitioner and another person by name, K.Prabhakar Yadav filed O.S.No.306 of 2006 in the Court of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy and obtained injunction against the accused and that the dispute between the parties is pending in the said suit. Respondent No.3 denied the allegation that he called the petitioner to the police station in the name of investigation and tried to influence her to withdraw the complaint and that respondent No.4 has been exerting influence over him to see that the investigation is not done since his wife is one of the accused in the criminal case. It is further stated that the investigation was conducted on proper lines and that if the petitioner has any grievance in respect thereof, he is entitled to file a protest petition. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submitted that after completion of the investigation, a final report was filed before the jurisdictional Magistrate on 21.09.2006, after serving notice on the petitioner on 20.09.2006. In view of the above facts, I am of the opinion that no interference is called for by this Court in the criminal proceedings. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by the final report, he is entitled to file protest petition raising her objections before the jurisdictional Magistrate and pursue her further remedies in accordance with law. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is dismissed. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 16.06.2010. ES