IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 1ST APRIL 2008 / 12TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 8839 of 2008(B) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: -------------------- JOSE MATHEW, KALLOORKUNNEL HOUSE, MANKULAM P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.D.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, IDUKKI. 3. THE GENERAL MANAGER, THE IDUKKI DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, HEAD OFFICE, P.B.NO.2, IDUKKI COLONY P.O IDUKKI DISTRICT. 4. THE IDUKKI DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, ADIMALI, IDUKKI DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. R1 & R2 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN R3 & R4 BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.8839 of 2008-B = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 1st day of April, 2008. JUDGMENT 1.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that following the interim order dated 14-3-2008, amounts have been deposited as directed therein before the civil court which issued the warrant. On production of a copy of this judgment with appropriate application for cheque, that court will issue immediate orders for release of the amounts to the decree holder bank. 2.After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the bank, it is noticed that there is no jurisdictional error or legal infirmity in the impugned proceedings. Accordingly, the learned counsel for the writ petitioner confined the WP(C)8839/08 -: 2 :- submissions by stating that the petitioner's daughter is due to get married shortly and that he may be given a breathing time to pay off the outstandings. 3.Under such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing that the petitioner shall repay the entire remaining amounts at the rate of Rs.8,000/- per week payable on or before every Wednesday commencing from 9th April, 2008 to prevent enforcement of the warrant issued by the court below. Such remittances shall be made directly to the bank and the bank shall promptly issue receipts which the petitioner may produce before the executing court. On satisfaction of the award by the aforesaid process, the court below shall recall the warrant. Until then, that warrant shall stand suspended, if the petitioner makes remittances as afore-directed. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, Sha/010408 JUDGE.