:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2595 OF 2006 Shri Suresh Gaikwad ...Petitioner Versus Tahsildar, Igatpuri and Ors. ....Respondents Mr.Sachin Chavan Adv. for the petitioners. R.M.Patne, Adv. for the respondents. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 15th January, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. The petitioner’s licence has been restored but not the card holders within the area of his operation, is the grievance. 2. It is contended that the card holders through the Sarpanch of the village had made a representation on 5.7.2005 and they seek restoration of their supplies :2: :2: :2: from the shop of the petitioner, inasmuch as, his licence having been restored, the villagers/card holders are desirous of going back and obtaining supplies from the petitioner. These are matters which are to be decided by the Administration looking after the Public Distribution System and not by this court. If the requests of the card holders are pending, they must be looked into and I am sure that the authorities concerned will look into the same and pass such orders as are in the interest of the card holders to ensure equitable distribution of the essential commodity concerned namely, kerosene. The representation to be disposed off by the Sub-Divisional Officer within a period of two months from today. Petition disposed off. No order as to costs. 2. In the light of the order passed on the Writ petition, Civil Application does not survive and the same is disposed off. sd/- *******