- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.365 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.365 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.365 OF 2005 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.177 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.177 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.177 OF 2005 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : MARCH 3,2005. : MARCH 3,2005. : MARCH 3,2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr.Godbole for the Applicant. The challenge in the suit is to the demand for payment of rent at enhanced rate. The Respondent is a statutory local authority and the applicant is a cooperative bank. The Applicant is occupying the commercial premises from the year 1979 and even according to the terms of the document of lease, the duration of lease has expired in the year 1986. 2. Considering these facts, no interim relief can be granted in favour of the Appellant. It is obvious that the payment of all the amounts by the Applicant and the receipt thereof by Respondent-Council will be subject to final outcome of the Second Appeal. 3. With these observations Civil Application is rejected. - 2 - JUDGE. JUDGE. JUDGE.