IN THB H2SH COURI QP JUBICATURE AB BILftSPBR (C.S.l. WRIT BE'EI'FIW N0. ^2-Q ®F2083 BETWEN G.D.Bansal s<an ®fLate dirl ffiet Ban Bansal, agefl about 52 years, Scrap contracfr & General Qrder •upplisr, Jei stantbh Chewk, wibikapur , Distrist SHrgujy (co). :/ -f cs-' .''^" kQ^^" ..•" y'" ^'"- .••''~ ^•^•^••' SETZTIGNEK <^ '^"•"'^§ ^- ^/ . 2. A N B ^ry ,.^' ~ •- f!)^ ^C^^O^- ^o' -.<?'$- 3. ^ 4. 5. fc.,-w^ Sia State ®fChhattisgarh, threugh the Secretary Bepartnent ®fPublie warkB and Bridges Canstruetian, ntralay, D.K.S.Building, Haipur. 3^e Chief Bagineer, lrf»k Nirman Vibhag, setu Nirman Evam EasbtFiya Raj Marg arishetr Wipur, febsil an^ Dlstriet Balpur. 'Ehe superintending Sagiaeer* Puibl ic w@rks Begartinent Setu Nirman ndal migarh, Sebsil and Distriet saigarh (GG). 3'he Executive Engineer, Public liBrks Department setu Nirman sambhag Bilaspur (GG). She CBllecter, Bilaspur, Bistriet Bilaspur (CG). RES?(SBENIS WRIT PETI'nOH UNDER AKTXCLES 226/227 CS" THE eaiSII'rD'rICN e? INDIA t&:.l s--w£"' i:-J/ ;t..I«»%., .^y'^o HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONERS WMT PETmON No. 520 of2003 G.D.Bansal. RESPONDENTS VERSUS The State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRTT PETmQN UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OFINDIA SB: Hon'bleShri Satish K. Aanihotri. J. Preseirt: None for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Goveniment Advocate forlhe State. ORDER \s (Passed on 29'" day ofNovember, 2011) The matter is caUed for hearing twice. None appears nor is any rqiresentation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In view of fhe above, the matter is dismissed fcw- want of nrosecution. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge •nit