/ifi.^-- ^\^^ (B ^ ^^-y ^.-••- BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BlLASPUR WR[T PETITION (S) No.'^.SAS'~/2011 ^' PE^TITIQNER : H.D.Vaishnav S/o Late Shri Bhagwandas Vaishnav aged about 69 years, Retired Teacher, Ward No. 9, Dongargaon, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) RESPONDENTS : VERSUS /' 1.~ StateofChhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) ^' / 2. Accountant General, Pagariya Complex, Pandri, Near New Bus Stand, Raipur (C.G.) y .3. Principal, Government Higher Secondary School, Dongargaon Rajnandgaon. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CON_STITUTIQN OFINDIA. ff ISte%®&> JI g ^ 'TST -i)i<fi<n4|, »ti1y'i(o, fqyi'M^ '^)i^o •3'2s6S~./ll 3?i^?iTrasi? (• ail^iqiifrlN; 7WT cHI^T *l<i'to ^ TOnw^feisn^i <iM*<!(ri^1't j4w<rff ^ t^st <rar^R ^3TRlI[3TI^[ SB : Hon'bie Shri Nianjndra Kiohan S 2948-2011 Advbcate •snri Basant Uewangan, Shri Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Shri Santosh Tiwari, siandingl With the consent of iearned heard finallv. This case pertains to grievan( of retirai dues. Learned counsei instructions, submits that the matterl Retirai Dues Committee. This Coun, in W.P.No.4643/ S'rare of Chhattisgarh & others) ancj the Committee to consider the auestion of facts were invoived. Th< State Government, pursuant to the| VV.P.No.1961/2006 (Smt Keia Bai of Chhatrisgarh and others), and M.C.C. No.105 of 2008 (State of Mandal and anothen. Thus, this t>< judgment and order dated VV.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mand^i counsel appearing ror tne partles. This petition is accordingly c|i the office 6f the Advocate Generai 1 coun^ei for the petitioner. Generai for the State. tcounsel for respondent No.2. c<)unsei for the parties, the petition is hrivasiaya. «J. ;e arismg on account or non-grant appearing for the petitioner, on may be referred to the High Povi/er matter }/2004 (Baijnath Mandal vs. The other connected matters, directed of retrial dues as the disputed Committee was constituted by the lorder dated 19-06-2006 passed in Khandrakar Vs. State Govemmenf jorder dated 13-3-2008 passed in Ctihattisgarh and others Vs. Baiinath j)etition is squarely covered by the January, 2008 passed in id^i (supra) as submitted by learned isposea or in tne same terms i.e., s directed to send the case to the 2® XI-HC—78 3 [ •<iiAfi<n''4, atii'y-'Ko, I'si^i'yy Eop($.)i--o. aa&r"/ :ffl^('tpw ('qpS; an^I W fe.-was ^TT SRT^T sbifl^i Daepl. --—"^v- 3P< 3ftTat... '^spnrarfi ^IT^R"....... wnwgftg 311^1 —^— dal/s contiminse Committee, within a period of 15 of this order. Therearter, the petitioner ana onicers concernea w( Tne Committee snaii consiaer ana after affordlng proper opportunity oetitioner ana tne onicers concerneti necessan/. i ne emire exercise, any, to the petitioner, be completed the date of receipt of copy of this The petitioner shaii suppiy on^ State counsei as weii as counsei transferring the same to the Commit|ee orcter <^i^<lli MTf^ff ^ f^£^il^^.t-l ^Taiftiirsn^r from the date of receiDt of copv shail issue notice to the (ithin a further period of 15 days. order, in accordance with iaw, tsf hearing io the petitioner. The ieti may file additionai documents, if inctiudin'g payment of retira! dues, if Nthin a oeriod of four months from compiete set of the petition to the for the Accountant Generai for 8AI:^«SVi^as ^^' ^o^&l" Sud?,6 ,tava