IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 17TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 26TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 33818 of 2008(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.K.RAVEENDRAN, SPECIAL VILLAGE OFFICER, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, RESIDING AT SHYAM NILAYAM, MATTANAKKAL, ARAKUPARAMBU VILLAGE, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.KHALID SRI.N.GOPINATHA PANICKER SRI.T.P.SAJID SMT.NAMITHA JYOTHISH SRI.R.O.MUHAMED SHEMEEM SMT.P.S.MAHESWARI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. VIJAYA BANK, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF MANAGER, PERINTHALMANNA BRANCH, PATTAMBI ROAD, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTIRCT. 2. P.K.A. LATHEEF, ADVODATE COMMISSIONER, ADVOCATE, MANJERI. R1 BY ADV.SRI.B.S.KRISHNAN (S.) SRI.K.ANAND SMT.LATHA KRISHNAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.33818 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of November, 2008 JUDGMENT Even going by Ext.P1 judgment issued by this Court on 24.9.2008, the petitioner was continuing in possession without complying with the judgment issued in April, 2006, issued after the respondent bank had obtained Ext.P7 decree. Even Ext.P1 judgment was after proceedings were taken under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The materials on record does not persuade this Court to show any indulgence to further protract the matter. The writ petition fails. The same is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.