IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 15TH JUNE 2007 / 25TH JYAISHTA 1929 OP.No. 22467 of 2000(Y) ---------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. T.K. ONACHAN, SON OF LATE KURIAN, THEVARMADAM, RESIDING AT VADAYAMPADI, IKARANAD VILLAGE, MANAGING DIRECTOR, THEVARMADAM RUBBER INDUSTRIES (P) LTD., MINI INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, VADAYAMPADI. 2. P.K. SLEEBA, POOKOLI HOUSE, RESIDING AT PANCODE, IKARANAD NORTH VILLAGE, MANAGING PARTNER, SAJ RUBBER INDUSTRIES, PANCODE. BY ADV. SRI.P.SANJAY, SRI.A.PARVATHI MENON, SRI.M.V.JOSEPH. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICE AT PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, K.S.E. BOARD, THRIPUNITHURA. O.P. NO. 22467/2000: 3. THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL MAJOR SECTION, K.S.E. BOARD, KOLENCHERY. BY SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB. THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON C.M.P. NO. 37867/2000 IN O.P. NO. 22467/2000 DISMISSED 15/06/2007. SD/- KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE INVOICE DTD. 01/06/2000 ISSUED TO P.1. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE INVOICE DTD. 01/06/2000 ISSUED TO P.2. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 12/07/2000 OF THE R.2. ISSUED TO THE P.1. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 12/07/2000 OF THE R.2. ISSUED TO THE P.2. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R1.A: COPY OF THE REASSESSMENT OF POWER CUT QUOTA 1996-97 CON. NO. 6767. EXT.R1.B: COPY OF THE REASSESSMENT OF POWER CUT QUOTA 1996-97 CON. NO. 10037. //TRUE COPY// prv. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- O.P. NO. 22467 OF 2000 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of June, 2007. J U D G M E N T Petitioners approached this Court with certain grievances with regard to the penal billing at the time of power cut during 1997. In several cases this Court had directed the Electricity Board to look into the matter regarding the procedure to be adopted for the alleged excess consumption than the quota allotted during the power cut period. Petitioners also may approach the 1st respondent. Their grievance also be looked into by the 1st respondent with notice to them. Interim order passed by this Court will continue for a period of six months. This original petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. smp