1 WP 9390.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. WRIT PETITION NO. 9390 OF 2011 (Sham Premchand Solanki VERSUS Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. through Sr. Regional Manager) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. P.V. Barde, Advocate h/f. Mr. N.L. Choudhari, Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. A.B. Dube, Advocate for the respondent ... CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 07.12.2011 P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. Admittedly, the requisite qualification for the dealership is having passed the S.S.C. examination. Shri Barde, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the qualification prescribed in the advertisement is matriculation, the rejection on the ground that the petitioner has not passed the S.S.C. examination, is not tenable, inasmuch as the qualification of matriculation can be construed as even having appeared for the said examination. 2 WP 9390.2011 3. The said submission does not appeal to us, inasmuch as the same also does not stand the test of common sense. That apart, if a qualification is prescribed, then it has to be construed of having passed certain examination. 4. In that view of the matter, no merit is found in the Petition. Rejected. Sd/- Sd/- arp [M. T. JOSHI, J. ] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]