(Kfz5/- & IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) No. U^ /2010 PETITIONER / Ku. Vandita Panikar aged about 31 years, D/o Bajrang Pd Panikar, R/o Avanti Vihar Colony, Q. N0. M-10, Sector 1, Post Office Ravigarm, Raipur VERSUS RESPONDENTS/l ..' z°^y/' ^7s^-^ ft •v~-.--- -c 9-: ^ 2 The State of Chhattisgarb, through Secretary its Secretary Tcibal welfare Department, D.K. S. Bhawan, Raipur High Level Caste Scrutiny Committee, through its President, Pt. Deendayal Upadhyay Nagar, Sector-4, Raipur Secrefary, Ministry ofHome Department D.K. S. Bhawan, Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF TKE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA y t' 8t< 7 sm <"> HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Si N0.420 OF 2 Petitioner Versus Respondents Ku. Vandita Panikar State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETiTiON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Aanihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the State. ORDER(ORAU 2. (Psssed on 02r"i day of February, 2011) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this Court, after the letter dated 16.12.2009 was communicated to the petitioner, has considered the requirement of the documents by the High Power Caste Scrutiny Committee in its order dated 19.8.2010, rendered in the matter of Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria v. Stste of Chhattisgarh & Others in W.P.(S) No.3338/2007 and other connected matters. Thus, the respondent No.2 may be directed to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the aforementioned order. Learned counsel appearing for the State/ respondents submits that the respondent No.2 may consider and decide the dispute pending bsfore the authorities within a period of six weeks, in the light of foregoing observation. In this respect, the petitioner is permitted to file other reievant documents, if so advised, within a period of one week from today. Accordingly, the respondent No.2 is directed to examine the case of the pet'rtioner in the iight of the order passed in Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria (supra) and pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of sbc weeks from !n view of foregoing, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok