1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.276 OF 2009 in WRIT PETITION NO.6044/2005. Vasudeo s/o Balaji Mundhe & Ors. - PETITIONERS VERSUS The Collector, Parbhani & Ors. - RESPONDENTS ***** Mr.JM Murkute,|Advocate for Petitioners; Mr.DV Tele,AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 3; Mr.Maniyar, Adv. h/for Mr. VS Panpatte, Adv. for Respondent No.2. ----- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 22nd February, 2010. PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) In Writ Petition No.6044/2005, the Division Bench, by order dated 16.4.2008 allowed the petitioners herein to receive Rs.3,25,000/- deposited by the Acquiring Body with the Collector, Parbhani. At the same time, in view of the affidavit in reply, the Division Bench directed that the acquisition proceedings need to 2 be completed as expeditiously as possible. 3) The grievance of the petitioners/landholders is, in spite of such directions, they are not as yet complied with and the petitioners/landholders are wandering for their legitimate claim, though the tank is constructed and their properties are with the Government. Another contention raised was, the petitioner herein has share in the land Gut No. 303 and Award is not passed or compensation is not paid. 4) The authorities concerned shall independently consider about eligibility of the petitioner to stake claim based on his title. For the present, I do not see any oblique aspect on the part of the respondents in dodging the orders passed in Writ Petition No.6044/2005 dated 16.4.2008. No contempt surfaced. Contempt Petition dismissed. Respondents discharged. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/cp276.09