BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eleventh day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.8489 of 2011 NATARAJAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.3 Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALAYAMKOTTAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.A.EBENEZER Advocate For Respondent : M/S. K.S.DURAIPANDI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for offences under Sections 120(B), 406, 453 AND 409 IPC, in C.C.No.4 of 2006 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli, the petitioner has come up with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2. It is brought to my notice that the said case has been instituted on a private complaint. Since the petitioner did not appear before the lower Court on 16.04.2009, non bailable warrant was issued for his arrest. 3. In my considered opinion, this petition is highly misconceived. The remedy available to the petitioner is to appear before the Magistrate and get the warrant recalled. The very fact that from 16.04.2009, the petitioner did not abide the rule of law will got to show that he does not deserve any indulgence at the hands of this Court. Accordingly, this petition is not at all maintainable, because the petitioner has got remedy to work out before the learned Magistrate. In such view of the matter, this petition is dismissed. sd/- 11/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI 2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALAYAMKOTTAI POLICE STATION,TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.8489 of 2011 Date :11/10/2011 SMA/14.10.2011/4C/1P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/