IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4128 of 2011 SUCHITRA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 19.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of enticing away the minor daughter of the informant. It is submitted that during the investigation, it has come that the victim is staying with one Sant Kumar. Sant Kumar is not related to this petitioner and the petitioner has only been named since the petitioner's mobile was used for communication to the informant's side. It is further submitted that the mobile of the petitioner was lost somewhere prior to the occurrence. Learned counsel for the State however, submits that during the investigation, it is found that Sant Kumar is residing with the victim girl. 2 Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 209/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)