HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R. VARMA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA F.C.A.No.181 of 2010 Date: 25.08.2010 Between: K. Salahuddin … Appellant and Smt. Salma Hasimi … Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R. VARMA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA F.C.A.No.181 of 2010 ORAL JUDGMENT : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R.Varma) Heard learned counsel for the appellant-husband as well as learned counsel for the respondent-wife. 2. This appeal is directed against the order and decree, dated 07.06.2010, in O.P.No.492 of 2008, passed by the Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad, allowing the petition filed by the respondent-wife against the appellant-husband under Section 2(ii) (viii)(a)(c) & (f) of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty. 3. When the matter came up for hearing, since both the parties are present before this Court, the matter has been referred to A.P. High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, for conciliation. 4. Pursuant to the conciliation proceedings undertaken by the Secretary, A.P. High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, both the parties have settled the matter amicably and to that effect a Memorandum of Compromise, dated 25.8.2010, incorporating certain terms and conditions, had been filed before this Court. 5. Accordingly, both the parties are present before this Court and identified each other and also identified by their respective counsel. We examined both the husband and wife, who are parties to the said Memorandum of Compromise. Upon being questioned by us, both the husband and wife stated that they are aware of the contents of the said Memorandum of Compromise, which contains the signatures of both the parties as well as their counsel, and the consequences thereof. The said signatures were also identified by both the parties as well as their counsel. 6. In view of the fact that the parties have settled the matter and arrived at a compromise, we have no hesitation to disbelieve the veracity of the said Memorandum of Compromise. 7. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise, dated 25.6.2010. There shall be no order as to costs. 8. A copy of the said Memorandum of Compromise shall be appended to this judgment, which shall form part of this judgment. _______________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA __________________________ JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA 25.08.2010 Msr HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R. VARMA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA F.C.A.No.181 of 2010 25.08.2010 (Msr)