3mgie §ench IN THE HIGH COURT GF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH ééég No. é/$ [200s APPLICANT : Sohandas , S/o Thakux Singh Mahant (1N JAKL ) Bandora , Aged about , Police 45 Years Station- R/o Malkhamda Viliage— Tahsil Malkhamda DTstrict— Janjgir— Champa (C.G.) VERSUS ‘ State of Chhattisgarh Through- District— Magistrate District- Janjgir Champa (C.G.) NON -APPLICANT z ~91, 4‘ v \ PETITleN UNDER SECTION 48f’0F CLEC. FQR GRANT OF 31m, UNDER SECTION 437 (6) OF cum. HIfxH COURT QF (:HHATTISéARH AT BILA5PU Cr. iim”. No.618/203E Agglimnt Sohandas; S/o Thukur Séngh Mahm‘h (In Jaii) figed abou’r 45 years Rio Viiiaga- gander-a, Pdice $1micn, Mdkhamdm Tahsii Muik'namda, Disfr‘ic? - Janjqir- Champcx (Ci—k) wrgyg 5mm (if Chha‘rtisgarh Through Dish-id bisfric? Jaqjgir-Champu ~ an-a limm’ gPefition Dada." sac‘tim 4&2 of Cade of tifrimim! I’maedure} R v concludgd wi‘rhin 60 days of its commencgment but fhe. Cour!“ .belcw has denigd his righ‘r 1'0 release wifhou‘r any cogem' reason. 4. Learned ?I:mel Lawyer oppgsed me. bail lawman and subm31's that 0n twe dates witnesses were present but at the, request 0f teamed counsel for the applicant! they have net been examined on the ground that accused was not brought to the Court from cusmdy and therefcre, the gmund mentianed in the order impugned far not i releasing the applicant on bail is :just and. proper: M ( As, '2 s O! dE-I HHQUg'IBd , yaluvged. I! "3VEQI$ H!Gl W’g!!esse$ We! a v . present‘ but‘the counse! for the applicant was reluctant to cross- examine the-witnessee on the graund that the amused was mt i brought befure‘the Court fmrn the judicial custody‘ In the instant case, prosecution has produced the witnesses but they have net been examined because the ecunsel for the applieant was not ready to cross—examine the witnesses) The Csurt belew- has rejected the application of the applicant vide well reasoned order. The Court below , .v l has net committed any illegality er irregularity, T do not find any ground. for invoking extra—ordinary inherent jurisdiction 6i Consequently, the petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. l i Sty. j T.P. SHARMA ‘i ‘ ‘ Judge KW