1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION No. 3010/2011. Subhash bhanu Bijlekar -VERSUS- Dy. General Manager, SBI and another. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : 30.06.2011. Heard Shri Yogesh V. Nayyar, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Petitioner – a Security Guard has been dismissed for proved misconduct after departmental inquiry. The learned Counsel attempts to demonstrate that as material in custody of the respondent was not produced, the finding is perverse. We find that the validity of the departmental enquiry as also appropriateness of the 2 punishment can be looked into there effectively in proceedings under Industrial Disputes Act, where the petitioner also gets an opportunity to lead evidence and point out prejudice caused to him, if any. Hence, we are not inclined to interfere at this stage. If petitioner moves the conciliation authority within a period of four weeks from today, the said officer shall attempt to expeditiously finish the conciliation proceedings and if there is failure, the appropriate government shall within a period of 8 weeks of receipt of such failure report, refer the matter to the Competent Central Government Industrial Tribunal. Hence, with liberty to petitioner as above and without expressing anything on merits of the matter, we dispose of the petition with the above directions. No costs JUDGE JUDGE Rgd