HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 29 of 2010 Decided on: 1.8.2014. Dr. Parul Uppal & ors …Petitioners Vs State of HP … Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the Petitioners: Mr. Umesh Kanwar, as vice counsel. For the Respondent: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, AG, with Mr. Ravinder Thakur, Mr. H.K.S. Thakur, Addl. Advocate Generals and Mr.Tarun Pathak, Deputy Advocate General for respondent. ________________________________________________________ V.K.Sharma, J. (Oral) CMP No.504 of 2014 Reply not filed. Heard. The application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, is allowed in view of the grounds stated therein. Consequently, the petition is disposed of as infructuous as services of the petitioners as Medical Officers have since been regularized by the respondent-State. However, as prayed for, liberty shall be reserved to the petitioners to approach the competent Authority by filing representation(s), individually or collectively, to claim surviving relief, if any, in accordance with law, but without any unreasonable delay, if so advised. The petition as also pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of in the above terms. Copy Dasti. (V.K.Sharma), Judge. August 1, 2014 (sl)