IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32965 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision 7.1.2010. Vishal Sharma ..... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARBANS LAL Present: Mr.A.S.Sullar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Tarunveer Vashisth, Additional A.G. Haryana. HARBANS LAL, J. (ORAL) CRM No. 59515 of 2009 Allowed as prayed for. CRM-M-32965 OF 2009 This petition has been moved by Vishal Sharma, under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking his anticipatory bail in case FIR No.167 dated 9.9.2009, registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Naraingarh, District Ambala. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and the car in question was recovered from his co-accused Kanwarpal. He further puts that the case was registered against Kanwarpal, who during the interrogation suffered disclosure statement by naming the petitioner. He further submits that the parties have entered into a compromise, as per Annexure P-2, the CRM-M-32965 of 2009 (O&M) -2- affidavit of the complainant Sachin Kumar. On instructions from ASI Jagbir Singh, the learned State counsel informs that the petitioner, in compliance with the order dated 23.11.2009, has joined the investigation and he is not required for further interrogation. In view of the fact that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and the car in question has been recovered from his co-accused Kanwarpal, the dated 23.11.2009, vide which he was admitted to interim anticipatory bail by this Court, is made absolute. Petition stands disposed of. January 7, 2010 (HARBANS LAL) rishu JUDGE