<2 ^n<-^7- ^' IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR YC.G.) WRIT PETITION fS) N0. l^feS OF 2010 ^ PETITIONER .Y9</ A:'^A-'" .\.?"^J&7'^..-' y\o..--' ^My^ .SdP"' -^,-' "<' ^y 0'' RESPONDENTS .^ata Wc/f.,^^ '' y^-3B's9 ''•< isl%'^1^.^" ^fts^ew^^ R. B. S. Shandilya Son of Late Shri Dharam Say Singh, aged about 67 years, Retired Sub Inspector of Police, Resident of Navapara Khurd, Post Mahangai, Police Station Ramanujnagar, District Surguj'a (C.G.). VERSUS 1. ' State of Chhattisgarh, through; the Secretary, Home Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2.' The Director General of Police, Police Headquarter, Raipur (C.G.). 3. The Superintendent of Police, Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.). ^~ 4. The Secretary, Retiral Dues Pension Committee, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 5. The Senior Account Officer, Accountant General Office, Pandri, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARSOFTHE PETITIONER As given in the cause title. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1285 of 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS : R.B.S.Shandilya. VERSUS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. ^ A^d Writ Petition Under Article T3S Of The Constitution Of India SB: Hon'bte Shri Saiish K. Aanihotri. J. Present Shri V. K. Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Dy. G.A. forthe State. Smt. Fouzia Mirza, tesistant S.G. ter the respondent No. 5. OKK. ORDER (Passed on 29" day of March, 2010) With the consent of leamed counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is heard finaily. 1. Leamed counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the case, being payment of reb'ral benefits matter, may be referred to ttie pension committee. 2. This Court, in the mattsr of W.P. No. 4642/20)4 (Baijnath Mandal v. Ttie State of Chhattsgafh S Other^ and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retirai dues as the disputed quesb'on of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Govemment, pureuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 pa^ed in W.P. No. 1961,'2006 (Smt KejaBai Chandrakar Vs. Siata Govemment and aSier^ and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhatlisgaih S Othars v. Baijnath Mandal and anottiei). Thus, this petition is squareiy covered by ttie judgment and order dated 31 of January, 2008 passed in VV.P. No. 4642/2004 Baljnath Marutol (suptd) as submitted by iearned counsei appearing forthe parfes. 3. Witti the consent of the parties, this petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e. the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, wfthin a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the petition from the peb'tioner and this order. Thereafter, the CommiBee shall issue notice to the petitioner and ttie offlcere concemed, wjthin a further period of 15 days. The CommiBee shall consider and pass order, in accoidance wlth law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petiiioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, inciuding payment of retiral dues, if any, to the peb'fjoner be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. The petitioner shal! supply extra copy of the petition to the leamed counsei appearing for the fespondents fbr fomardir^ the same to the Committee. Bib"«l ^1^T""