IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4466 of 2011 Ram Jiwan Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 2 21.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Speaking order dated 2.5.2011 has been passed by the Chairman of the Commercial Taxes Tribunal, Bihar. A reading of the narration with regard to the history of service of the petitioner by itself speaks the actual state of affairs. Merely because the petitioner was allowed to work or to assist in a particular fashion in the tribunal he does not get a right for substantive appointment or benefit of pay to the post of Peskar. Petitioner’s entry into service was that a peon and it was in that capacity he was permitted to work as such on his pay scale. Matter was deeply looked into and in the opinion of earlier Advocate General which was obtained on the issue, there is no law to give the benefit which the petitioner is looking for. No interference is required in the impugned order. It may also be noted that it is not the first effort of the petitioner to come to the High Court for the same/similar relief. But on none of the occasion the Court had been indulgent enough to give any benefit, beyond the law, prevalent on the issue. Petitioner has no right to claim such kind of benefit after looking at the reasoning given by the authority in the speaking order which is well considered and has passed on the direction of the Court. This writ application is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)