IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.54 of 2008 MURARI CHAUDHARY Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SHIV SHANKAR SAH 3. KAUSHAL KISHORE 4. RAJU SAH 5. RAKESH SAH 6. RAJESH SAH ----------- 2. 06.01.2009 Heard. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking leave to appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal recorded by the learned trial court. The opp.parties herein were tried for offences punishable under sections 323,380 and 452 IPC and were acquitted. The judgment indicates that the prosecution in order to prove the charges got examined three P.Ws. The trial court has considered those evidence in paragraphs 9,10 and 11. From perusal of paragraph 14 of the judgment it appears that there is series of litigations intra parties. This fact has not been denied by the learned counsel for the petitioner. This Court finds that certain Exhibits, for example, Exhibit A.B.C and D were brought on record to show that there was animosity between the parties. In the light of the said fact, the learned trial court has carefully and cautiously evaluated the evidence of the witnesses. This Court finds no justification to allow this application. It is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )