mst FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.16 OF 2009 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, appearnaces, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------- R.Sathyanarayanan for appellant. J.P.Yagnik, APP for State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 22nd January 2009 PC :- 1. Admit. Call for the record and proceedings. Learned APP waives service. (A.S.OKA, J.) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.36 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.16 OF 2009 Motilal Ratanlal Pawar Applicant versus State of Maharashtra Respondent R.Sathyanarayanan for appellant. J.P.Yagnik, APP for State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 22nd January 2009 PC : 1. Heard advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the State. The conviction of the applicant is for the offences punishable under section 7 and section 13(1)(d) with section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The maximum substantive sentence is rigorous imprisonment for one year. The fine amount has been deposited. The applicant was on bail during pendency of the trial. Considering the pendency of very old appeals in this Court, the final hearing of the appeal is not likely to reach before the period of substantive sentence is over. ((-3-)) 2. Considering the aforesaid circumstances, I pass the following order :- (a) The applicant shall be enlarged on the same bail on which he was enlarged during pendency of the trial, subject to filing fresh bail bonds within a period of four weeks from today. (A.S.OKA, J.)