IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No.1425 of 2011 Date of Decision: 20.09.2011 Harminder Kaur ....Petitioner Versus D.P.S. Kharbanda and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. A.P.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Khunger, Advocate for respondent No.1. ***** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL J. (ORAL) C.M. No. 22920 -CII of 2011 Reply filed by the respondents is taken on record. C.O.C.P. No.1425 of 2011 This petition has been filed under Section 10 & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for punishing the respondents for wilful and intentional disobedience of the order dated 04.05.2011 passed by this Court in CWP No. 7913 of 2011. According to the petitioner this Court had given direction to respondent No.3 to decide the representation filed by the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. Upon notice, reply has been filed on behalf of respondent No.1 wherein it has been stated that the representation has been decided on 09.09.2011, by the Commissioner Municipal Corporation, and a direction was issued to Municipal Town Planner to remove the encroachment/wall raised on the public passage. On 15.09.2011, the Municipal Town Planner reached the spot and has demolished the encroachment raised in the shape of wall on the portion of the street, and the compliance report in this regard has been submitted by the Municipal Town Planner as Annexure R-1/2. The Municipal Town Planner has also supplied the photographs showing the removal of the encroachment raised in the shape of wall on the portion of the street, which is annexed as Annexure R-1/3. In view of the above no further action is called for in this petition. However, in case the petitioner has any grievance subsisting, it shall be open to him to take recourse to legal remedies in accordance with law. Diposed of. 20.09.2011 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) tarunsahni JUDGE