In the High Court of Judicature at Patna Cr. Misc. No.49632 of 2007 Sindhu Sah Vrs. The State of Bihar & Anr. **** /4/ 04.07.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. In spite of proper service of notice, no one appears on behalf of opposite party no. 2. Petitioner is the husband, against whom case under Sections 323 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioner submits that marriage was performed in the year 1990 and after so many years for a small cause complainant left her matrimonial home. The petitioner is still ready to live with opposite party no. 2. 3. Considering the facts, the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner, Sindhu Sah, is allowed. He is directed to be released on anticipatory bail, on his surrender before the Court concerned within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. 647 of 2005 Trial No. 1882 of 2005 to the satisfaction of Sri A.K. Gupta, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Kaimuar at Bhabua, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Cp:3/S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J. )