IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8173 of 2011 MANOJ RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 467,468 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the informant’s wife is illiterate lady and hence she used to get the cheques filled up by the neighbour and petitioner being the son-in- law of the neighbour has enchased two cheques amounting to Rs. 59,000/- and 86,000/- of the informant’s wife. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner resides at Mumbai and the mother- in-law of the petitioner took Rs. 25,000/-as a loan from the informant’s wife on 10.01.2009 and in lieu of that she mortgaged the land document to the informant’s wife who made her signature on the document as gets reflected from Annexure-2 which clouds the accusation and thereafter this case was lodged on 12.12.2009. 2 It appears that the encashment was done in June and July, 2009 when the case was lodged in December,2009. It is further submitted that the bank officials refused to identify the petitioner. Considering the nature of accusation and in the background of the fact that the mother-in-law of the petitioner mortgaged some land document in favour of wife of the informant, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Jakkanpur P.S. Case No. 257 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)