:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2811 OF 2008 Anand Yeshwant Devkar and anr. ..Petitioners. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents. Mr.R.S.Apte,Sr.Advocate i/by Ramesh Ramamurthy,Saikumar Ramamurthy for the Petitioners. Mr. D.A. Nalawade, G.P. for the Respondent No.1. mr. S. Patil Patil i/by Utangale & Co. for the Respondent No.3. Mr. Zal Andhyarujina i/by Murudkar & Co. for the Respondent No.4. Mr. V.R.Dhond with Sanjay Kadam i/by Kadam & Co. for the Respondent No.5. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATE : 20th April, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. By this petition, the petitioners seek a declaration that the Development Scheme sanctioned for Plot No.455 is invalid because it also includes Plot No.453. From the record, it appears that the same contention was raised before the Supreme Court where Judgment dated 21.12.2006 delivered by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.5626 of 2006 was challenged before the Supreme Court.That Special leave Petition has been dismissed by the Supreme Court. Only submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners is that though the contention was raised before the Supreme court, the documents were not filed. If that is so, the remedy of :2: the petitioners would not be to file writ petition in this court raising the same point again. Petition therefore, cannot be entertained. Petition rejected. ( D.K. DESHMUKH, J.) (R. S. MOHITE, J.)