IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23/6/2006 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE PRABHA SRIDEVAN Writ Petition No.15907 of 1998 Cethar Industries Limited rep. by its Deputy General Manager K.V.R.Lakshmi Narayanan ... Petitioner Vs 1. State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary to Govt Energy Department Fort St.George Chennai 9. 2. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board rep. by its Chairman Anna Salai Chennai 2. 3. Superintending Engineer Pudukottai Electricity Distribution Circle Pudukottai 622 001. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent made in letter No.476/SE/IEMC/EET/AEE2/AE2/97 dated 6/8/1997 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to forthwith extend to the petitioner the Tariff concession at 182/1 Veeradipatti Village, Gandarvakottai Taluk, Pudukottai 613 301 of the petitioner unit to which the petitioner is entitled as per G.O.Ms.No.29 energy dated 31/1/1995 read with G.O.Ms.No.17 dated 14/2/1997 for a period of three years from the date of grant of service connection to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For petitioner ... Mr.S. Silambanan For respondents ... Mr.R.Subbiah for E.B. O R D E R This matter is covered by the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos.1289 to 1293 of 1999,etc., batch and orders have been passed following that. One such order reads as follows:- "Whereas it is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that his case has not been favourably considered by the respondent-Board. However, without going into the merits of the case, I direct the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 29/8/2005 in the light of the order passed by the Division Bench cited supra and pass orders on merits after affording opportunity to the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is also made clear that the payment concession to pay in instalment given to the petitioner by letter dated 2/7/2005 will not be disturbed and the petitioner is liable to comply with the condition given by the department without default. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.". 2. Following the above cited judgment, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22/4/1996 and pass orders accordingly. No costs. Consequently, the connected W.P.M.Ps are closed. mvs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ To 1. The Secretary to Government State of Tamil Nadu Energy Department Fort St.George Chennai 9. 2. The Chairman Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Anna Salai Chennai 2. 3. The Superintending Engineer Pudukottai Electricity Distribution Circle Pudukottai 622 001. + one cc to Mr. S. Silambanan, Advocate srn o. 26695 JE(CO) NM(30.06.2006) W.P.No.15907 of 1998 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/