: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.402 OF 2007 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.188 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9583 OF 2004 Shrikumar Co-op.Hsg.Soc.Ltd. & Anr. ....Petitioners V/s. A.A. Khan & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.Mohan Pungliya for the Petitioners. Mr.L.H. Patil for Respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 to 6 and 8 to 11. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 4TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. : 1. It is not possible at this stage to state that there is any obstruction or even objection from the Respondents to the work that is proposed to be carried out by the Petitioners. 2. At the request of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, the Registrar General is requested to appoint an Architect from the panel of the Court Receiver who shall supervise the work being carried out by the Petitioners’ contractors. In the event of there being any impediment created by the Respondents, the said Architect shall file a report to that effect : 2 : in this Court. The costs of the Architect shall be entirely paid by the Petitioners in advance. The Respondents do not object to this. 3. If there are any arrears or amounts payable by the Respondents, the Petitioners are at liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings in accordance with law for the purpose of recovery of the same. 4. With the above clarification, the Contempt Petition is accordingly disposed of.