IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39713 of 2010 PRAMOD RAI @ PRAMOD S/O- CHANDRIKA RAI. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 23.05.2011 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Sections 47(a) and 47(f) of the Excise Act. It is submitted that although the allegation is that huge quantity of foreign and country made wine and labels and other apparatus etc. were recovered but the petitioner does not reside in village. It is the stand of the petitioner that he resides in Delhi. In my view, petitioner should surrender and apply for bail and place before the Court below all relevant facts which shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. The application stands disposed of. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J)