1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.508 OF 2009 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1092 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.906 OF 2008 Abdullah Riyasatali Khan and ors. ...Appellants v/s M/s Osaka Synthetics Pvt.Ltd. ...Respondents Mr A.G. Damle for Appellants. Mr R.D. Suryawanshi for Respondents. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND R.V. MORE JJ. DATE : 6TH MAY 2010. 2 P.C. :- 1] By this appeal, the appellants make a grievance against the order of the learned Single Judge of this Court dated 7th August 2009 passed in notice of motion No.1092 of 2008. The learned Single Judge has passed an order of temporary injunction in a suit filed for a decree of specific performance of an agreement to sell the open land. The learned counsel appearing for appellants submits that the finding recorded by the learned Single Judge in paragraph 4 of the order that the defendants have admitted receipt of Rs.30,00,000/- from the power of attorney holder is wrong. We have perused the record. We have heard the learned counsel for both the sides. We find that not only the statement that Rs.30,00,000/- is received from the power of attorney holder is made in paragraph 3 of the sur-rejoinder, but the same statement is made in the complaint filed by the defendants before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bhiwandi wherein a categorical statement is made that Rs.30,00,000/- 3 has been received from the power of attorney holder. Therefore, we find that there is evidence on record to support the finding recorded by the learned Single Judge. Therefore, we do not see any reason to interfere with the order impugned. Appeal is rejected. Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary of this Court. Certified copy expedited. (JUSTICE D.K. DESHMUKH) (JUSTICE R.V. MORE)