IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4079 OF 2008 Harikisan Bhikaji Wagh ...Petitioner Versus Nashik Municipal Corporation & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Sagar Kasar for Petitioner. None for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JULY 17, 2008. JULY 17, 2008. JULY 17, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. I see no reason to depart from the discretionary order passed by the Court below. The Petition is rejected while giving liberty to the Petitioner to agitate before the Appeal Court about the correctness of the approach of the Court below in passing the impugned order resulting in prejudice caused to the Petitioner. That question will be considered on its own merits at the : 2 : appropriate stage. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner assures to file two sets of court fees, as two orders have been challenged. Second set of court fee be paid within one week from today. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.