1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1570/2011 (SNEHA SHIKSHAN SANSTHA & ANOTHER VERSUS DY. DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.Z. Jibhkate, counsel for the petitioners. Mrs. B.H. Dangre, Addl.G.P. for the R-1. Mrs. R.D. Raskar, counsel for the R-2. Mrs. M.P. Munshi, counsel for the Intervenor (C.A.W. 1180/2011). CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : JULY 27 , 2011 . Shri Jibhkate, the learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that while making the proposal for transfer of the management from Sneha Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, Pimpalgaon (Sadak) to Sneha Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, Lakhori in the year 2006, erroneously, the word ‘Lakhori’ was inserted in place of word ‘Pimpalgaon’ in view of the order passed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that since Sneha Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha Lakhori was not registered, the respondent no.1 has cancelled the order of transfer of the management by the impugned order dated 11.03.2011. If that be so, according to the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sneha Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, Pimpalgaon (Sadak) is willing to make an 2 application to the respondent no.1 for transferring the management of Vandana Kanya Vidyalaya, Pimpalgaon (Sadak) to Sneha Shikshan Sanstha, Lakhori. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that the necessary application in this regard would be made within a period of ten days. The respondent no.1 is directed to consider the application filed by Sneha Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, Pimpalgaon (Sadak) in accordance with law and by considering the fact that previously, the respondent no.1 had permitted the transfer of the management and due to some misconception and mistake on the part of the petitioners in making the application for transfer, the impugned order dated 11.03.2011 is passed. Even assuming that there is a ban on the transfer of the management in view of the existing Government Policy, the said ban would not come in the way of the respondent no.1 in considering the case of the petitioner no.2 for transfer as the respondent no.1 had already permitted the transfer of management in the year 2007 and this is an old case of transfer of management in favour of petitioner no.1. In view of the aforesaid directions, the grievance of the petitioners stands redressed, at this stage. The writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. Steno copy of the order be supplied to the learned Additional Government Pleader, on request. JUDGE JUDGE APTE