IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST JULY 2009 / 10TH ASHADHA 1931 RP.No. 597 of 2009(N) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.14377/2009 Dated 26/05/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION: ------------------------------------------------------ V.N.KRISHNAN, S/O.NARAYANA SWAMY, PADINJARE MADOM, MOORKANIKARA, TRICHUR 680752. BY ADV. SMT.K.GIRIJA RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS IN THE WRIT PETITION: ------------------------------------------------ 1. THE POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED, (GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ENTERPRISE) REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, CORPORATE OFFICE, "SAUDAMINI", PLOT NO.2, SECTOR-29, GURGOAN, HARYANA-122 001. 2. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, M/S.POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED, REGIONAL OFFICE, 32, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE 560 001. 3. THE CHIEF MANAGER, M/S.POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED, CONSTRUCTION AREA OFFICE, "CHANDINI", PLOT NO.190-B, MAVELIPURAM COLONY, P.O.KAKKANAD, KOCHI-682030. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- R.P.597/2009 in W.P.(C).14377/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 1st day of July, 2009 ORDER Petitioner in W.P.(C).14377/2009 has filed this Review Petition contending that there is an error apparent on the face of the judgment, in as much as that this Court has directed the respondents to consider Ext.P4 marked in the writ petition. It is pointed out that Ext.P4 is a set of photographs showing the establishment being run by the petitioner. Though it is possible that the direction was intended in relation to Ext.P5, I am satisfied that interest of justice would be met only if there is a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the comprehensive representation, which the learned counsel for the petitioner points out, has now been filed as evidenced by Annexure-A2. Accordingly, after hearing counsel on both sides, the judgment dated 26.5.2009 is reviewed and the 1st respondent is directed to consider Annexure-A2 representation and pass appropriate orders after R.P.597/09 2 hearing the petitioner as well. This shall be done within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Review Petition is disposed of as above. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs