:1: :1: :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.165 OF 2004 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.124 OF 2004 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST.) NO.19381 OF 2004 FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST.) NO.19381 OF 2004 FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST.) NO.19381 OF 2004 Mukul Manish Gupta .. Applicant. Versus Laxmi Munish Gupta .. Respondent. --- Mr.Sanjay Krishnan i/b Singhania Legal Service for the applicant. Mr.Laxmi M.Gupta for the respondent. CORAM : S.B.MHASE & CORAM : S.B.MHASE & CORAM : S.B.MHASE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 17, 2005. DATE : JANUARY 17, 2005. DATE : JANUARY 17, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard both sides. In view of dismissal of civil application no.123 of 2004 on account of default of the lawyer this application was rejected because basically civil application no.123 of 2004 which was for condonation of delay was dismissed. By allowing civil application no.163 of 2004 now civil application no.123 is restored and, therefore, civil application no.124 of 2004 is equally restored. Civil application is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) :2: :2: :2: :hcs/sbm/