1 WP 3221/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3221 OF 2010 Natwarlal Hiralal Agarwal and another ..... Petitioners. v/s State of Maharashtra and others ...... Respondents. Ms. Pravina J. Kanani for Petitioners. Mr. Rajesh More, APP for the State. Mr. Satish Maneshinde i/b Ms. Snehal Khairnar for Respondent No.2. CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 16th November, 2010 P.C:- 1. Parties have settled the dispute. They have filed consent terms which are signed by the Petitioner and by Respondent No.3 and by their respective advocates. The consent terms are taken on record and marked “X” for the purpose of identification. Respondent No.3 has agreed to receive a sum of Rs 2,93,50,000/- alongwith interest towards the cancellation of the purchase of the Flat, cancellation of allotment letter and the cancellation of memorandum of understanding. Petitioners have entrusted Demand Draft to the advocate for Respondent No.3 who is present in court. 2 WP 3221/2010 He submits that he has no objection if the complaint is quashed. 2. In view of the consent terms filed by the Petitioners and Respondent No.3, Writ Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). The learned Counsel for Respondent No.3 submits that Respondent No.3 is not present in Court and that in view of the Consent Terms his presence is not necessary. 3. Writ Petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed off. V.M. KANADE, J.