IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14733 of 2005 Surendra Prasad Yadav , son of Ram Lakhan Rai,resident of village- Jitowarpur Nizamat,P.S.-Muffasil, District- Samastipur. ………. Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The District Magistrate, Samastipur 3. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Samastipur. 4. Circle Officer, Jitwarpur, District-Samastipur. ……… Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2 25.11.2011 Heard Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State. The prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to remove the encroachment from the Public road. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon various Annexures in the writ petition to show that even the authorities have enquired into the matter and given direction for its removal but according to him, no action has been taken as yet for its removal inspite of reminder being sent for the same. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petition stands disposed off with a direction to the Sub-divisional Magistrate, Samastipur to look into 2 the matter and ensure that road in question is made free from encroachment in its entirety. Such exercise should be completed in accordance with law within two months from the date of production/receipt of a copy of this order by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Samastipur. Sudha (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)