C1) amf IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR(CHHA'ITISGARH) WR1T PEFIHON NofSBS 2003 /f \. Tr“ ‘ PETITIONER Jagannath Singh,S/0.Naga Singh )V Aged about 63 years R/o. Company Bazar,Ambikapur, Tahsil & Distt : Ambikapur (CG) VERSUS i3 The State of C.G. Through Secretary Edtlc-ation, D.K.S. Bhawan , Raipur (C.G.) DirectoyEducation, a, Pension Bada Ralpur( C G) 3) District Educatron offcer " Ambikapur, Dlsst Sargu1a(C.G.) 4) Principal, Government Higher Secondary School, Ambikapur, District: Sarguja, (C.G. ) J.K. Prasad,S/o Unknown Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Ambikapur, District: Sarguja, (C.G. ) / f“ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 8L 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR GRANT OF WRIT NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR CERCIORARI OR ANY WRIT OR DIRECTION OF THE LIKE NATAURE RESPONDENTS 2) 5) , N; “No.3‘759 WW‘ saw W (WW) WWW 26.08.2004 On mention being made the c2 Shri Rahul Mishra, learned cal Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, learned D' Heard both the counseL The petitioner by way of this p arbitrariness on the part of the re unauthorized absence and thus ni petitioner. Learned counsel for the petit been retired from service on 30.0! counsel further submitted that the pe= financial difficulties due to non-paym parties submits that a direction be made for filing the representation. parties, the petitioner is directed to ng his grievance to the competent such representation is filed, the respondents shall consider and detide the same by a reasoned order within a period of two month from the date of receipt of such representation and amount found due shall be paid within four weeks thereafter. In case, the claim is reje mentioned. mmfewi‘w‘» mmm‘m‘ mm fwm $sifanm Having heard counsel for the tile a detailed representation narrat authority within fifteen days. If ise is taken up. insel for the petitioner. /A.G. for the respondents 1 to 4. w etition is challenging the illegality and spondents in treating the leave as )t paying the retiral benefits to the oner submits that the petitioner has 12002 vide Annexure P/1. Learned :itioner is a poor man and he is facing ant of retiral benefits. Counsel for the cted, the ground of rejection shall be The aforesaid observation in thle petition stands disposed ofbgl“ é—tWiX wvtwy ,z, CW a/Wotity (Mtge g Sdl- Fakhruddin 5/Judge f .. z GLDRJ FS/350~lZ/2000—50,000t f2;