HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.34543 of 2011 Date: 29.12.2011 Between: B.Venu Gopal Reddy ..... Petitioner AND The State Public Information Officer, Hyderabad and another. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Kummathi Venkatesulu Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared The Court made the following: ORDER: Feeling aggrieved by non-furnishing of part information relating to allotment of house under Andhra Pradesh Rajiv Swagruha Scheme in Anantapur town, the petitioner filed this Writ Petition. From the averments made in the affidavit, filed in support of the Writ Petition, it is evident that against the order of respondent No.2 refusing to furnish part- information, the petitioner filed First Appeal before respondent No.1 who has confirmed the order of respondent No.2. At the hearing, it is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that against the order of respondent No.1 passed in the first appeal, a second appeal lies to the State Information Commissioner under Section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. In view of the availability of an efficacious alternative remedy, this Court is not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition at this stage. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed, without going into the merits of the case, with liberty to the petitioner to avail the above-mentioned alternative remedy. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.No.42979 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 29th December 2011 DR