IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5240 of 2011 1. RAJEEV RANJAN 2. Sanjeev Paswan 3. Diwakar Kumar 4. Ram Ratan Paswan All are sons of Late Kanhaiya Lal Paswan 5. Prabhakar Kumar , Minor Son of Late Kanhaiya Lal Paswan ( under the guardianship of his elder brother Rajeev Ranjan, petitioner no.1) All are resident of village- Sanha (Tirasi Tola), P.S. Sahebpur Kamal, District-Begusarai -------------------Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna 3. The Director General of Police,Bihar,Patna 4. The Regional Inspector General of Police, Bhagalpur Region, Bhagalpur 5. The Deputy Director General of Police, Bhagalpur 6. The Superintendent of Police, Banka -------------------- Respondents. ----------- 02 24-03-2011 Heard Sri Atul Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Rakesh Singh, learned A.C. to Govt. Advocate appearing on behalf of Respondent nos.1, 3, 4, 5 & 6 and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent no.2/ Accountant General,Bihar,Patna. The petitioners’ father died, while in service and posted as Sub-Inspector of Police in Belhar Police Station, Banka, on 3.7.2010. It is submitted that after death of their father, death – cum- retiral dues has not been cleared. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that mother of the petitioners died on 5.9.2005 and petitioners are sons of deceased employee and are entitled to get 2 death-cum- retiral dues of their father. A representation has also been filed before the Superintendent of Police, Banka. However, no decision has been taken till date. It has been prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners that writ petition may be disposed of directing the Respondents to take decision in the matter. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being disposed with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh representation before Respondent no.6 i.e. the Superintendent of Police, Banka within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed by the petitioners, Respondent no.6 is directed to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing the grievances of the petitioners within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. If Respondent no.6 considers the claim of the petitioners as genuine, he is required to pass appropriate order regarding clearance of the dues within the aforesaid time. After receipt of the sanction by the State Government, Respondent no.2 i.e. the Accountant General, Bihar is required to issue authorization within one month from the date of receipt of sanction. With above observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)