**1** IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5666 OF 2009 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1866/2009 Dr.A.Riyaz Kitabwala. ....Petitioner -VERSUS- Abdul Rashid Mohammad and another. ......Respondents ........... Ms.Sonia Miskin, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.P.J.Ramchandani, Advocate for the Respondents Nos.1 and 2. ........... CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATE : 14th October, 2009. P.C. : 1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the Respondents Nos.1 and 2. 2 It is not in dispute that the application at Exhibit-6 and application at Exhibit-10 made by the Petitioner are pending before the Trial Court. In application at Exhibit-10, apart from other reliefs based on allegations of breach of injunction, there is a prayer for restoration of possession. 3 As the said applications are pending before the Trial Court, at this stage, no purpose would be served by entertaining this Writ Petition. The applications can be ordered to be disposed of expeditiously provided **2** that the Petitioner will cooperate with the Trial Court for speedy disposal of the said applications. 4 Hence, the petition is disposed of by passing the following order:- (1) Hearing of the applications at Exhibits-6 and 10 is expedited and the Trial Court is directed to decide the said applications on or before 05.12.2009. (2) It is made clear that the Petitioner will have to cooperate with the Trial Court for disposal of the said applications and if any attempt is made on the part of Petitioner to delay the hearing of the said applications, the Trial Court will not be bound to decide the said applications within the time-frame fixed by this Court. (3) Subject to what is stated above, Writ Petition is disposed of, however, all the contentions raised are expressly kept open. (4) In view of disposal of Writ Petition, Civil Application No. 1866/2009 does not survive and the same is also disposed of. [A.S. OKA, J.] kps