IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.53975 of 2007 DILIP KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14.5.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner is apprehending arrest in Kotwali P.S. Case No.36/2007 under Sections 366, 366A, 368, 376 of the I.P.C. According to the petitioner even though he has been named in the F.I.R. but with the recovery of victim girl, in her Section 164 Cr.P.C. statement she has alleged things against one Mr. Sunil Kumar and Sunil Kumar alone, there is no statement of any kind which has been made against the petitioner. Even in the F.I.R. the informant has expressed certain suspicion about the petitioner. Taking the facts as they are, supported by the statement of the victim girl, let the petitioner, namely, Dilip Kumar, in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties in the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Alok Raj, Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gaya, in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 36 of 2007, subject to conditions under Section 438(II) of the Cr.P.C. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)