THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.16162 of 2006 ORDER: The petitioner enclosed certain area in the cellar portion of a multi-storied building. The respondents issued a notice under Section 636 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955. The petitioner submitted an application, dated 28.08.1998, to the respondents for the relief of regularisation of the unauthorised construction. Her grievance is that no orders have been passed thereon. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation. The petitioner is not able to state as to the basis on which she filed the application for regularisation. Be that as it may, if an application was made for regularisation, it cannot be kept pending indefinitely. In case the petitioner is not entitled for any relief, the application is to be rejected and on the other hand, if the prayer of the petitioner can be granted under any scheme, she can be extended. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to pass orders on the application, dated 28.08.1998, submitted by the petitioner, if it has not been disposed of as yet; within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:29.10.2009 kdl