IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13810 of 2010 Date of Decision : August 16, 2010. A-One Builders .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Vinod Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is a Contractor who is said to have executed the works allotted to it by the Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana-respondent No.2 vide resolution No.1678 dated 28.2.2009 (Annexure P-1). It is alleged that though the petitioner has already completed the works and submitted its bills which have been duly verified and approved, yet no payment is being released despite various representations followed by a legal notice dated 8.5.2010 (Annexure P-5) served on its behalf. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, however, without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioner's claim, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent C.W.P.No .13810 of 2010 2 No.2 to take notice of the petitioner's claim contained in the legal notice dated 8.5.2010 (Annexure P-5) and release the admitted/undisputed payment in accordance with the Rules, within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 16, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE