IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20342 of 2010 1. KARANT LAL, S/o Late Banke Prasad. 2. Vinay Nat @ Vinay Kumar Ram, S/o Late Budhi Nat @ Budhi Ram. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 15.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 417 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Considering the nature of allegation against the petitioners, let the petitioners be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of surrender of the petitioners, named above, within four weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 934(C) of 2009 (T.R. No. 2076 of 2010) on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Arrah subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with 2 the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the petitioners shall undertake to be represented on the first date after cognizance and in case they fail to do so, their bail bond will be liable to be cancelled (iii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)