IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.385 of 2005 1. The State Of Bihar Through the Secretary Cum Commissioner, Department Of Forest and Environment, Government Of Bihar, Patna 2. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Bihar Described as Chief Conservator of Forest, Ranchi 3. The Regional Chief Conservator of Forest, Patna 4. The Conservator of Forest , Gaya 5. The District Forest Officer, Gaya and 6. The Range Officer, Gaya, Gaya Division, Gaya. Versus Ashok Kumar Sinha S/O Raghuvansh Prasad, resident of village and post office Belhari, District Gaya. ----------- 5. 29.11.2010. None appears for the appellants. Heard Mr Keshav Shrivastav, learned Senior Advocate for the respondent. The State of Bihar has preferred this appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the High Court of Judicature at Patna, and raises a grievance with respect to the order dated 25.1.2005, whereby C.W.J.C.No. 9895 of 1999 (Ashok Kumar Sinha Vs. The State of Bihar & others), has been disposed of with the liberty to the writ petitioner to submit a representation before the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests for regularization of his service in accordance with law. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. No positive direction has been issued to the State Government, and the direction is only to consider the grievance of the petitioner and be disposed of by a reasoned order. We, therefore, do not find the slightest justification for this appeal. The State Government has burdened this Court with a most unwanted matter. It is accordingly dismissed 2 with the direction to the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests to dispose of the representation with a reasoned order as was the direction of the learned Single judge, within a period of two months from today. Let a copy of this order be handed over to Mr Awadesh Kumar Pandey, learned G.A.7, who is appearing in the analogous LPA No. 792 of 2007, to be forwarded to the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, to control the flow of litigations to Courts at the instance of the State Government, and to fall in line with the litigation policy of the Government. (S.K.Katriar,J). Shashi (S. P. Singh, J.)