"\ ^ HiGH COURTOF CHHAmSGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETiTION (S) N0.5098 OF 2009 Ku. Ajarrta Das, D/o Late S.M. Das, aged about 50 years, R/o North ChimrTtri, Gelhapani, Distt. Koriea (CG). Versus 1. State of Chhatfisgarh, through tha Secretary, School Education Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur(CG). 2. The District Education OfficCT, District Koriea (CG). (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Present:" Shri Ashwini Shukla, counsei for the petstioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate for th®State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 8 day of September, 2009) 1) Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2) Leamed counsel for the petitioner submtts that the State GG^ernment has constituted a committee by order dated 9-6-2008 (Annexyre - PN) to decide the cases of ad hoc teachers, as involved in the present case. In view of that the petltioner seetes permission of this Court to niake a repreBentation before the respondent authorities in the same nnianr^r, as crther similariy situated teachers have been considered. 3) Leamwl counset for the State submits that jf a representatioii is made, the same shatl be considered and d^?id^d in the light of eircular dated 9-6-2008. 5) In viwv of foregoing, aocording to the learned counsel for the petitioner nothing survives in this petition for adjudteatjon. 6) Accordingly, the writ petUion is disposed of. —- - Gowri Sdf- Satish K. Agnihotii Judge