' ‘ §1IGH CCU§T OF CHHATTISGARH AT EILASPUR W ‘ CORAM: HéN5ELE SHRI RAJE’EV GUPTA, CLJ. ‘ HON‘ELE SHPd SUNH. KUMAR $£NHA, J. Writ Peti€§on No.2102129539 Fetitionea' MG Tarnekar, s/o late $8 Tarnekar aged about 62 years, Ex—Pmfessar; Govt Science Coiiege, Raipur (MP) R/o C-2 Ramkund Vihar Near Vivekanand ‘ Ashram, RaipurGViF’) VERSUS Staie of Madhya Pradesh through — The Secretary, Hégher Educatéon Department, Govt of Madnya Pradesh, Mamraiaya, ‘v’aHabh —- Bhawen, Bhope} (MP) 2 The Principal, Govt. Science Coilegef GE Road, Raipur (MP) 3 Head of the Department, (Physics), Govt Sc§ence CoHege, Raépur (MP) 4 MP State Aciministrative Tribunai Bench at Raipur (MP) through — Registrar. Resnondenite: Petition under emote 22$i227 of the Constitution F’tesent : Snri VG Tamaskar, counsel forthe petitioner. S .ri VVS Murthy, Deputy Advocate Generai with Shri Akhii Agrawai, Panel Lawyer for the State! respondentevt to 3. ORoER (215‘ Jury, 2999; The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, CJ. Learned counsel for the parties are heard.» ii’l l l l l l ” 2) Petitioner MG Tamekar, a retired professor of Government Science Coiiege, Raipur has fired this Writ Petition for the foiiowing reliefs : “1, that the Honibie Court be pieased to quash the impugned order dt.12.1.2000 passed by Hon’bie Shri L.J'. Singh Member (J) M.P.S.A.T. Bench at Raipur (MP). by issuing a writ of Certiorari. 2. that the Hon’bie court be pieased to direct the respondents 1 to 2 to release the salary of the petitioner for the period 1.1 .1998 to 30.04.1998 with interest by issuing yet another Writ of Mandamus. 3. that the Hon’ble court be pleased to issue any other writ or writs, order or orders, direction or directions deemed fit in the interest of iustice.” 3) The dispute between the petitioner and the respondents is in regard to payment of salary to the petitioner for the period from 01.61.1998 to 30.04.1998. During these four months, the petitioner, after his retirement from the service rendered his services for teaching the students in the hope of getting confirmatory order from the Government, but no such order ever came into existence. 4) Considering that the petitioner admittedly rendered his services as Professor for a period of four months under the orders of the Principal of the Government College dated 29.01.1998, we are of the opinion that the matter requires a sympathetic consideration by respondents No.1 to 3 as according to the petitioner, salary of other similarly situated Professors was paid by the Government. 5) We, therefore, direct that on the petitioner’s making a representation to respondents No.1 to 3 within a period of four weeks from today, in regard to his grievances, the same snail be considered and decided by respondents No.1 to 3, within a period of two months from the date of the receipt of the representation. 6) With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. 3' sal- ‘i i Sd" ‘ Sunil Kumar Sinha _j i‘ Chief Justice Judge