THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No. 5125 of 2008 O R D E R: In this Revision filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners, who are the plaintiffs, aggrieved against the order, dated 23.10.2008 rejecting a memo purported to have been field by them, wherein they claimed certain amounts as due towards arrears. The case of the petitioners is that in spite of the orders passed earlier by this Court in Civil Revision Petition No. 523 of 2008, dated 27.06.2008, still there are arrears, which are neither accounted for nor paid, hence there is default. However, the complaint is that the court below disposed of the memo straightaway without going into the several details given in the memo nor giving any opportunity to substantiate the same. Hence, the Revision. Having heard the learned counsel on either side and also having perused the material available on record, it is seen that the memo is said to have been filed on 21.10.2010, whereas the earlier Revision was disposed of on 27.06.2008 and the order impugned was passed on 23.10.2008, within three days of the filing of the memo. Apparently, there was no opportunity as well given to the respondents herein to file any counter memo or counter to the said calculations, either disputing or admitting the same. In view of the same, it is desirable that an opportunity to be given to go into the correctness of the calculations made vis-à-vis the amounts as claimed by the petitioners. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The order dated 23.10.2008 in Memo (SR) No. 6051 of 2008 in O.S.No. 11 of 2007 on the file of the learned II Senior Civil Judge, City Civil court, Hyderabad is set aide and the matter is remanded to the Court below for fresh disposal on merits and in accordance with law, after giving opportunity to both the sides. No costs. ------------------------------- (B. PRAKASH RAO, J) 24th March 2011 ksld