OZ? HIGH CGURT OF CHHATTI$GARH, BILASPUR “LP. {S} No. 6785 of 2007 Smt. Indira Singh, aged about 44 years, w] o Shri Vijay Kumar Singh, Lecturer(BiologV) Goverumcnt Higher Secondaly Schoel, Dundera, Biock Durg Rfo A-lQf Street-12, Ashish Nagar, Risali, Bhilai, Dis’m'ct DurgiCG) PETITIONER RESPONDENT$ 1 State of Chhattisgaxh, Through The Secretay Department of Education DKS Bhawan, Raipur(CG) The Director, Dirsctorate of Public Instructions, ' Chhatiisgarh, Raipur(CG The District Education O£F1cer, District Durg(CG) Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts and PenSion, Raipu1‘(CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTI’I‘UTXON Versus QF INDIA Appearance: Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the State on advance copy. SUNIL KUMAR SHIHA, J Heard on admission. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has passed M.Ed. examination on her own expenses, therefore, she is entitled to receive two advance increments according to circuiars dated 24.12.1998 and 01. 03.1999. He also submits that in many identical matters, the petitions have been aiiowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporatiotg, Durq and another {2006 (H) MEIR-CG 96}. He submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the said judgment. r ORAL ORDER {17.1 1.2007) Shri Rakesh Anthony, counsel for the petitioner. ) 2 W.P.N0gSg 6785/2007 This legal position is not disputsd by the leaméd counsal fQr 11m State. However, he submits that the. order may be yassed in terms of the said judgment, but it ohali be subjeeteéi to veriiication regarding petitioner’s such qualification. Accordingly, this Writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in case of Yashwam Kumm‘ Bharadwaj Vs. Municipai Cmporation, Durg and another {Supra} subject to vexification of the facts as to whether the petitioner had acquired M.Ed. Examination Cer1jf1cate on her own expenses as yer circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and furtherwhether she has been paid two advance The petition stands iinally disposed of. No order as to costs. Sdl— Sunil Kumar Sinha 1 Judge increments or not. l w