In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan At Jaipur Bench, Jaipur O R D E R In S.B. Sales Tax Revision Petition No.489/2008 Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Anti-Evasion, Bharatpur Vs. M/s. Surya Construction Company, Banipark, Jaipur and another Date Of Order :: 2nd December, 2008 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jitendra Ray Goyal Mr. Dharmendra Pareek on behalf of Mr. Jag Mohan Saxena, for petitioner. .......... By the Court :- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned judgment and the other material available on the record. 2. It is not the case of the department that the non- petitioner no.1 was not having valid documents or they were having any intention to avoid or evade tax but according to the department, incharge of the goods and driver of the vehicle produced all required documents at the time of checking on 27/12/2002 at Kama-Deeg. 3. Keeping in view the principles laid down in the case of State of Rajasthan Vs. Tajinder Pal (Tax Update Volume 6 Page 84), I do not find any impropriety or illegality in the impugned judgment of Rajasthan Tax Board, Ajmer. 4. Consequently, this revision petition along with stay application is rejected at the primary stage. (J.R. Goyal),J. V.S. Shekhawat/- Jr. P.A. .