1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11403 OF 2008 IN F.A. ST. 10577 OF 2004 The State of Maharashtra - - Applicant (Orig. Respondent) Versus Chandrasen Narayan Machawe - - Respondent (Orig. Claimant) WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11404 OF 2008 IN F.A. ST. 10678 OF 2004 The State of Maharashtra - - Applicant (Orig. Respondent) Versus Narayan Baburao Machawe - - Respondent (Orig. Claimant) WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11405 OF 2008 IN F.A. ST. 10691 OF 2004 The State of Maharashtra - - Applicant (Orig. Respondent) Versus Gautam Gore - - - - Respondent (Orig. Claimant) 2 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11406 OF 2008 IN F.A. ST. 10696 OF 2004 The State of Maharashtra - - Applicant (Orig. Respondent) Versus Dagdu Jyotiram Pawar & another - - Respondents (Orig. Claimants) WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11407 OF 2008 IN F.A. ST. 10686 OF 2004 The State of Maharashtra - - Applicant (Orig. Respondent) Versus Chandrasen Narayan Machawe - - Respondent (Orig. Claimant) WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11408 OF 2008 IN F.A. ST. 10695 OF 2004 The State of Maharashtra - - Applicant (Orig. Respondent) Versus Jeejabai Bhagwan Gore - - Respondent (Orig. Claimant) 3 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11409 OF 2008 IN F.A. ST. 10687 OF 2004 The State of Maharashtra - - Applicant (Orig. Respondent) Versus Gyanoba Krishnaji Bhong - - Respondents Deceased through L.R.'s. (Orig. Claimants) Shri J. S. Gawane, A. G. P. for the applicant/State. CORAM : K. U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 18TH JUNE, 2009. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned A. G. P. The State feels aggrieved by the award dated 10.01.2002 in L.A.R. No. 1167/1992. The certified copies were applied on 27th February, 2004, which were received on 10th March, 2004. The matter was moved to the authorities on 06.05.2007. The delay of 727 days is apparently not properly explained. Incidentally the record indicates reference Court awarded compensation of Rs. 14,000/-, while the S. L. A. O. has made it Rs. 6,182/-, the difference is of Rs. 7,818/-. 4 2. The delay is not properly explained, applications dismissed with the dismissal of the appeals. [ K. U. CHANDIWAL ] JUDGE bsb/June 09/CA 11418.08