IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.7 of 2008 Between: J.Venkateswarlu ..... PETITIONER(S) AND J.Ramachandra and others .....RESPONDENT(S) HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.7 of 2008 ORDER: Petitioner who is the 5th defendant filed this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the correctness of the order rejecting his application purported to have been filed under Section 45 of the Evidence Act and Section 151 of C.P.C. wherein he sought for sending Ex.B.3 Will dated 04.08.1987 to the Government Printing Press, Nasik, Maharastra State. Admittedly, the suit is for partition which has been filed as long back as in the year 2002 and the petitioner was brought on record as 5th defendant in the suit in the year 2004. Further the present application is filed after the trial is concluded and the case is posted for arguments in the year 2007. As rightly pointed out by the Court below, absolutely there is no explanation as to why he has not opted so earlier. Therefore, I do not find any reason warranting interference by this Court in the impugned order. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed. No costs. ____________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J 24th June, 2010 CVRK