IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. &\\6 1201 0. > Petitioner: Lekhdhar Diwan, aged about 50 years, S/o late Shri R. K. Diwan, occupation service, working as Sub Inspector, Police Station, Berla District Durg (CG). Versus Respondents: 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Home ((Police), D. K. S. Bhavan, Mantraiaya, Raipur (CG). Director General of Police, Police a Headquarters, Raipur (CG) Inspector General of Police (Administration), Police Head Quarters, Raipur (CG). Inspector General of Police, Durg Range, Durg (CG). Superintendent of Police, Durg, District Durg (CG). WRIT PETITOIN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARIhMANDAMUS, ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. . H§GH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILA$PLjR ?# WRIT PETH‘QGN LS} NO 2? 1G of 2010 Lekhdhaf Diwan Edmqmg Versus Resgendeng State of Chhattisgarh & others. WRIT PET1TION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF lNDlA (SB : Hon’bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Prese_n:_:- Shn‘ Ranbir Singh Marhas, Advoqate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Moonhy, Deputy Advocate Genemi with Shri NN‘ Roy, Pane! Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 3 Day of May, 201 0) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the impugneé transfer order was passed on 12/1 1!2069 (Annewre PH). No effect was given to the impugned transfer order for about five months. Thereafter, ait of a sudden by order dated 15i4/201O (Annexure W2). the petitioner was relieved and directed to join the new place of posting as ordered on 12/1 “20139. Learned oounsei further submits the administrative exigency has been diiuted on account of the fact that during nve months .severai representations havebeen made and without any rhyme and reason severai orders have been canceiied. Aocordingiy, the respondent authorities may be dérected to consider and decide the pendtng representation of the petitioner dated 1511 1/2009 in View of the ietter dated 15/02l201G written by the Superintendent of i’oiice. (Burg to the inspector Genreai of Poiice {Police Headquarter) Chhattisgarh, Raipur, in accordance with iaw, as early as possibie. Shri Moorthy, iearned counsel for the State, submits that the pending representation of the petitioner shaii be considered and decided, in accordance with iaw and on its own merits, as eariy as possibie preferabiy within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposedoi. Sdl— Atun SATIsH K. AGNIHOTRI Judge