IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 17TH DECEMBER 2010 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 8260 of 2010() --------------------------------------- CRIME NO.5050/2010 OF PUDUNAGARAM POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD ....... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED A-1 TO A-4 -------------------------------------------------- 1. SASI, S/O.NARAYANAN, AGED 31 YEARS, KALYANAPETTA, KANNIMARI, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD. 2. PRAKASAN, S/O.KUNJU, AGED 25 YEARS, KALYANAPETTA, KANNIMARI, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD. 3. SUMESH, S/O.SUKUMARAN, AGED 28 YEARS, KALYANAPETTA, KANNIMARI, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD. 4. SANTHOSH, S/O.SWAMINATHAN, AGED 25 YEARS, KALYANAPETTA, KANNIMARI, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.K.ANAND RESPONDENT(S): STATE & COMPLAINANT -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PUDUNAGARAM POLICE STATION. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss V.RAMKUMAR, J. --------------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.8260 of 2010 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of December, 2010 ORDER The petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 to 4 in Crime No.505 of 2010 of Pudunagaram Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 324, 506(ii), 447 & 427 I.P.C. and Sections 3 & 5 of Explosive Substance Act, seek their enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 21/11/2010. The petitioners were arrested on 21/11/2010. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application contending inter alia that country bombs were hurled against the de facto complainant and others resulting the bombs exploding and causing injuries to two persons. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioners, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioners are released on bail, they will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the Bail Appln.No.8260/2010 : 2 : petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj