C^[, €TZ52- 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATHSGARH AT BILASFUR W.P.(S) No... ...€.€.^>.^..../2010 PEnTIONERS: ^ 1. Ashok Kumar Patel S/d Shri Pushkal Prasad Patel Aged about 39 Years, R/o P.0. ' Tiisma, Block Nawagarh, District Janjgir Chainpa (C.G.) ^%^ \'e^' ..<^ A^ •••' ^^^ ^i^^y A^'./S-^'' tw' .-•' ^•y/" ^y ^^' ^-' /^sf:s^. ^" 2. VikasSingh S/o Shri Lav Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o P.0. Mahant, TahsU Navagarh, District Janjgir-Champa (CG.) ., 3. Bhoodhar Prasad Patel S/o Late Shri Bahadur Patel, Aged about 31 Years, R/o P.0. Tusma via Shrivrinarayan, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 4. Devlal Sahu S/o Shri Jagannathi Ram Sahu, Aged about 41 Years, R/o VUlage Godhna yia Kharaud, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 5. Ashwani Kumar Patel Shri Dhansai Patel, Aged about 37 Years, R/o P;0. Kot}ni Sonar via Akaltara District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ^ 6. LaljiPatel S/o Shri Dhaniram Patel, Aged about 40 Years, R/o P.0. Tusma via Shivrinarayan, Dista-ict Janjgir Champa(C.G.) 1, 7. Smt. Ariju Shanna W/o Shri Pravin Sharma; Aged about 37 years, R/o ViUage Kuriari, Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 8. Balrarn Patel S/o Shri Janiram Patel, Aged about 33 years, R/Q VUlage Tusma via Shivrinarayan, Tahsil Nawagarh District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) tE -^9. Shiv Shankar Dhiwar S/o Shii Dau'ram, Aged about 38 years, R/o Village Mahant, Tahsil Nawagarh District Janjgu- Champa (C.G.) *t .'.'...'.. . • ' 10 Dhanniiram Sahy S/o Shri Budhram Sahu, Aged about 37 years, R/o Village Tusma via Shivrinarayan, Dista-ict Janjgir Champa (C.G.) - 11. Durgesh Nandini Stngh W/o Shri Brajesh Singh, Aged about > 33 years/ R/o Mahant/ Tahsil ^ Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh - Through the Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S Bhawan, Manta-alaya, Raipur (C.G.) -2. Director Public Instructions Directorate Public Instruction, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) ^^wn y^ u^,^'^/' 'Vx'^ v\'l/% yZ. District Education Officer Districtjanjgir Q-iampa (C.G.) ^.h-." /%-' // ls::\'??.!•. ^t?'.ix- // ^y^ '<' ^^'!;l * /•-:// FETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- PARTICULARS OE THE PFnTIONERS: As stated above in the cause title. PARTICULARSQBTHE RESPONDENTS: As stated above in the cause title. 3. PARTICULARS OF THE CAUSE/ORDER AGAINST 'ltt • .' .. ' . ~~~ WHICH THE PETTTION IS MADE: • UF/tiU'tttIl^ ©ITISff ¥1 S MUKI'ffirfJ W.P.iSl N0. 6682 /20t0 PSTITIONERS RB8PONDENTS Versus Ashok Kmnar Patel & Ofeers State ofC.G. S& Othcrs WRTTPETITIONUNDBRARnC&EZaSOP'THECONSTCTUTION .OFJiNDIA'' ,,.:! :": ;.: • . /,. . :::.: Shri Jitendra Pali, couiiselfor the petitioriers, SIui Vivek Sharma, P.L. ft»rthe State. ORDBR (2a.lt^2010) , Grievance of the petitioaers iit ttus petition is that iriitially fhey were appouited as Contract Teacher Grade 1,11 & III aud therea&er as Shiksha Karmi Grade I, II & III but fhey are not beiQg permitted te> appear for tlie post. of Head Master on the ground fhat they do aot have the experience of seven years as Shiksha Kaniii. 2. Gounsel for fhe respondents/State subiuits thaf now fhe govem.ment has taken a decision to permit all those ShiKsha Kannis who have the experiertce of seven years either on fh.e post of Contra.ct Teacher oron tlle post pf Shiksha Kanni and fherefore, fhere reBiams aothing in the present petition. He has shown fhe letter dated 19.11.2010 issiied Iry fbfi Diiiector, Public Instruetions, Raipur addressed to the Advocate General. Copy ofthe said letter Uas beeh giyen to Shri Pali also aad he issatisfied wifh tlie SamLe. CQunsel for fhe petitioners subinits that the exauiiaation for fhe post 6f head masterisscheduledfor 28.11.2010 & 29,11.2010 andasfhe petitk)ners apgrehend tiiat fhey may not be peruutfed^to appear in tb®sanie, a diretetion inay be issu^ to ffie com^teiit a^ perurit theiu to appearin the said exainiiiatioa. —~~~.,^lf 3. State counsel submits ttiat the apprehension of fhe petitioners is premature and ifttiey haye duly fiUed in. tlie appUcation forms, the authority conceraed wouM act pursuaat to the decision taken by fiie State Govemment vide letter dated 19.11.2010. 4. In fhe facts aad circumstances ofthe case, as nofhiag survives in ftie petition, it is disposed ofwifh a direction td fhe cbiiipetent authority to pemut fhe petitioners to appear ia fhe examinatioa to be held on 28.11.2010 & 29.11.2010 forthe post of Head Master pursuaut to fhe decision taken by fhe State Gtoveraiaent subject to the veriflcation of the fact that t-he petitioners haye fiUed ia fheir forms aad the saxne have been duly accepted by the aufiiority conceined. Ifthe grievance ofthe petitioners still survives, they would he at Bberty to approachthis Court. ——~~ ' ^' Pritinker Diwakar / Judfee ,..^ ^^&^5&..^^^^&^;^^yfa^s&^^^Si