1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No.223/2008 in Writ Petition No.2136/2008 (decided) Shivshankar Waghmare and ors...vs..Division Controller, MSRTC Buldhana & anr. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Varma, Advocate by the appellants. Mr. Wankhede, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA & C. L. PANGARKAR, JJ. DATED : 24 th July, 2008 Against the order of transfer, petitioners have filed complaint under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practice Act, 1971 (for short MRTU & PULP Act). The complaint is still pending. However, as no interim relief was granted, the petitioners had moved the writ petition. After considering the case, by impugned order dated 20.05.2008, the learned Single Judge refused to interfere in the interim order passed by the learned Member, Industrial Court and, therefore, the petition was dismissed. The present Letters Patent Appeal, in view of 2 the above facts and circumstances itself is not maintainable as apparently it is against an interlocutory order apart from the fact that petition itself is under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The L.P.A. is, therefore, dismissed, however, the learned Member, Industrial Court to decide the application in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the observations made, if any, at the prima facie stage of the matter as contended by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. The L.P.A. is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE kahale