1 APPA.270-2011 acd FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 270 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL(ST) NO. 756 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memorandum Court’s or Judge’s Orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr. M.H. Bandekar, for the applicant. Mrs. A.A. Mane,. APP for the State. --- CORAM: U.D. SALVI, J. APRIL 11, 2011. P.C. Heard. Perused the application. Order dated 17.1.2011 dismissing the application for condonation of delay came to be passed as a result of Advocate’s absence on the said day. Para-3 of the application reveals that the Advocate had remained absent in court as his father was hospitalised. Hence, order dated 17.1.2011 is recalled. Heard. State waives the service of notice. It is submitted that on behalf of the applicant-accused that their poverty prevented 2 APPA.270-2011 them from challenging the judgment and order of conviction under Sections 489B and 489C of IPC, 1860, through Advocate of their choice and they could do so only after 83 days. Delay is condoned. The State has no serious objection for condoning the delay. Delay is condoned. (U. D. SALVI,J.)