IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR [WRIT PETITION NO.6210 OF 2006] [Nitesh Dharne ..vs.. Committee for Scrutiny & anor] ================================== Mr.P.T. Dhok, Advocate for petitioner Mr. N.W. Sambre, advocate for respondent no.1 Mr. Shyam Ahirkar, A.G.P. for respondent no.2 ================================== CORAM: D.K. DESHMUKH & P.B. VARALE,JJ. DATE: 15TH DECEMBER, 2008. Heard counsel for the parties. The Scrutiny Committee has given cogent reasons for the findings recorded by it. The petitioner was relying on two 1950 documents, one related to one Kodu and others related to one Laxmi Kisan. But there is no document produced by the petitioner to show that either Kodu or Laxmi Kisan was related to the petitioner. In fact the mother of the petitioner in her statement stated that Laxmi Kisan was not related to her. Taking over all view of the matter therefore, in our opinion, it can not be said that the finding recorded by the Scrutiny Committee are not based on the evidence before it. No interference is called for. Petition rejected. JUDGE JUDGE smp.