IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1097 of 2011 DILIP KUMAR @ DEVI, Son of Late Bishwnath Prasad @ Sohan Lal, resident of Mohalla Bakarganj, P.S. Pirbahore, District Patna. ….. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ……….. Opposite Party ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. N.A.Samsi, Advocate For the State : Mr. N.K.Prasad, A.P.P. ---- 2 14.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehend his arrest in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 419, 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 51, 52(A), 63, 68(A) and 69 of the Copy Right Act as well as Section 49(2) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is not named in the first information report as an accused. However, he apprehends arrest as he has been named with other persons allegedly to be involved in the business of illegal sale of spurious C.Ds. Learned counsel submitted neither the consignment was in his name nor anything has been recovered either from his personal possession or from his shop. His name has simply been taken in the first information report along with other persons and general and omnibus allegation has been made that all such persons are engaged in illegal trade 2 of spurious C.Ds. However, it is submitted that there no is specific allegation or evidence at all in this case which indicates his involvement in illegal business. Learned counsel appearing for the State submitted that his name is found in the body of the first information report along with others to be involved in the business of illegal sale of spurious C.Ds., however, it is also a fact that neither the consignment was in his name nor anything has been recovered either from his personal possession or from his shop. Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, let the abovenamed petitioner, namely, DILIP KUMAR @ DEVI in the event of arrest or surrender by him within four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate (Railway), Sonepur, in connection with Sonepur G.R.P.S. Case No. 25 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)