IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 28TH JULY 2011 / 6TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 20569 of 2011(U) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- JANIYA R.,D/O.JAIFER, RAMANALIKKAL HOUSE, PULINCHODE P.O., B.P.ANGADI, TRIUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O.,MALAPPURAM, PIN-673 635. 2. THE BOARD OF ADJUDICATION OF STUDENTS GRIEVANCES,CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O.,MALAPPURAM, PIN-673 635. 3. VICE CHANCELLOR,CALICUT UNIVERSITY , CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O.,MALAPPURAM,PIN-673 635. 4. UNNEEN,MANAGING TRUSTEE,SHIFA MEDICARE TRUST,ALSHIFA COMPLEX,PERINTHALMANNA-689 001. 5. AL-SHIFA INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE, (AL-SHIFA COLLEGE OF NURSING), ANGADIPURAM P.O., PERINTHALMANNA-689 674. 6. THE PRINCIPAL, AL-SHIFA COLLEGE OF NURSING, ANGADIPURAM P.O., PERINTHALMANNA-689 674. R1 TO R3 BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC. UTY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 20569/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT BOARD DATED 06/06/2011. P2: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 06/06/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.20569 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of July, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed Ext.P1 complaint before the 2nd respondent raising certain allegations against the management of the 5th respondent and its officials. In this writ petition the prayer sought for is to direct the 2nd respondent to deal with the complaint in accordance with law. 2. Heard the standing counsel appearing for respondents 1 to 3. 3. In the nature of the direction that I propose to issue, I do not think it necessary to put respondents 4 to 6 on notice. 4. If as stated by the petitioner Ext.P1 complaint made by him has been received and is pending, the 2nd respondent shall consider the same in accordance with law with notice to respondents 4 to 6. 5. This the 2nd respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC ab JUDGE