1. 2. HSQH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Peijtion No. 4384 of2Qu& Petltloners 1. ^haduram Sahu, -S/o H'rsram Sahu, Aged about 49 years. 2< Jairam, S/o Daniram, Aged about 47 years. 3. Sukhiyar, S/o Manbodh. 44 years. 4. Shsro Bss, D/o Blhsri, Aged about 48 years. A!l R/o Vjtjage Bodrabandha, P.0. Pond-Panduka, Tahsil Garlsbandh, Gram Panchayat Ghatkarra, PB. Rajjm, District Ralpur (C.G.) versus Respondents 1. of Chhawsgarh, Through the Secretary. PubiscWorks Departertent. Mantrajaya, D.K'.S. Bhawan, Rafpur 2. Englneer-in-Craw.PubticVVorks Department, Rajpur (C.6.) 3. Executjve Engineer, Pubtlc Works Department, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Sub-DIvisfonat Offjcer, Pubfte Works Department, Sub -Divlsson, RaJIm, District Raipur (C.G.) SB: Hon'bie Mr. K. J Smr. Fouz'ia Mirza, A^vocste for the petithner. Svllss Jatn, PaneS L-awyQf for the respondents. ORDER (Passea on th'ss 30th dayof March, 2007) { By thi's pQtItion, the petstloners, who are workjng on She of Gansman in the Publlc Works since 1.11.1978. seek a rellef th-at the petstloners hsving the of permanent employee by way of of their are to regujarizatJGn as jn the sepv'ices. for the pefjtloners wouSd that the of of an employee. on the of his contlnuous on the post of Gangman in Pubiic Works v/as considered by this Court in W.P. No. Vs. of & and other connected matters, decided on 4th January, 2007. Learned counsel for the 4. u^ further submlt that in the case of Govlnd (Supra) tt was that on the of 15 years continuous sepvice the petjtjoner attains the status of permanent empioyee, as defsned under RuSe 2(c) of the Chhattisgarh C»JVorkcharged and Contlnsency Pald Employees) Penslon Rutes. 1979 (for short 'the Rules, 1979'), framed under ArtlcSe 309 of the ConstitutlGn of Indla. tn that petltlon It was held that on compietion of 15 yesrs contlnuous serv'Sce, an empSoyee attasns of a permanent empSoyee and would retire at the age of 62 jn accordance with the ChhatSssgarh Shaskiya Sevak (AdhivarshJkl-Ayu) Adhiniyam, 1967 (for shoi-t 'the Act, 1967') read wlth Fundamenta! Rule 56. Learned counseS for the petitioners would next submit that the petltioners are in contlnuous for about 29 years and in vjew of the dectsjon of thls Court in W.P.No. KB/2005, the are to grant of permanent status. c-ounsel for the and having to the and circumstances of the case. the petitioners are granted jiberty to make a representation to the Respondent No.2, raising ali In regard to thes'r prayer for regutarization and In turn the No.2 consider and decide the representation. if any, in accordance with law, wlthin a period of two months from the of of the representation. No order as to costs. Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge