IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 1282 of 2011(S) --------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.10250/2011 Dated 04/08/2011 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ----------------------------------- E.JERMIAS, KUZHINJAKALA VADAKKATHU PUTHENVEEDU, VENKADANBU, KUATHOOR,UCHAKKADA.P.O., NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BIJU BALAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS 2,4,5 & 6 -------------------------------------------------- 1. PUSHPA BEEGAM, AGED NOT KNOWN, D/O.OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER PRESENTLY WORKING AS THE MANAGER, THE KERALA STATE FINANCE ENTERPRISES LTD., NEDUMANGADU BRANCH, NEDUMANGAD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695016. 2. PUSHPA LATHA, W/O.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR, K.P.5/504, KUDAPPANAKUNNU VILLAGE, NER DOORDARSAN KENDRAM, KUDAPPANAKUNNU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. MURALEEDHARAN NAIR,K.P.5/504, KUDAPPANAKUNNU VILLAGE, NEAR DOORADARSAN KENDRAM, KUDAPPANAKUNNU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 4. SUNIL P.NAIR, AGED NOT KNOWN, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESENTLY WORKING AS SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR(RR) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. S. JAMAL ADV. SRI. T. NAVEEN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs COC. NO. 1282/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE 1:JUDGMENT DATED 04/08/2011 IN WPC. NO.10250/2011 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs S.SIRI JAGAN,J. --------------------------- COC No.1282 OF 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T After arguing for some time ,counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Contempt Case, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to approach this court again if any proceedings are actually taken against the petitioner for recovery without proceeding against respondents 2 and 3 in the contempt case Permission granted and the contempt case is closed with the above liberty. S.SIRI JAGAN JUDGE MM 2 3