IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 25298 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: September 16, 2010. Gurjant Singh @Janta ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Bhavna, D.A.G., Punjab. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.69 dated 26.07.2010, under Sections 307/506/148/149 IPC and 25/27 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Badhni Kalan, District Moga. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that it is a case of no injury and that even no empty cartridge has been recovered and that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. CRM No.M-25298 of 2010 It has also been stated by learned counsel for the State that it is a case of no injury and petitioner is not required for custodial interrogation. It has also been stated that investigation in this case has been completed and cancellation report has been prepared. Hence, in view of this statement of learned counsel for the State, it has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that this petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as rendered infructuous. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) September 16, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2