bsb IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 8707 OF PETITION NO. 8707 OF PETITION NO. 8707 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra through the Vankshetrapal, Sagareshwar Abhayaranya, Sagareshwar, Post- Devrashtre, Tal. Khanapur, Dist. Sangli. ... Petitioners V/s Sahebrao Bhagwan Dhokale ... Respondent Mr. D.A. Patil, A.G.P. for the petitioner. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 15TH JUNE, 2007. 15TH JUNE, 2007. 15TH JUNE, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. The petitioners have challenged the award passed by the Labour Court in Reference (IDA) No. 33 of 1994. The petitioner terminated the services of the respondent with effect from 1.10.1989. The Labour Court has found that although the petitioners were directed to produce the muster roll for the relevant period, they have not done so. On this basis the Labour Court concluded that the respondent had completed more than 240 days’ in a year after he joined the services in April, 1986. The Labour Court has held that the petitioners were engaged 2 in an unfair labour practice as they have not followed the provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and that the respondent had not abandoned the services as contended by the petitioners. 2. In my view, the labour Court has committed no perversity in recording the aforesaid findings. 3. Hence, the petition stands dismissed. (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.)