IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9677 of 2009 SHIV KUMAR PRASAD, RETIRED SAINIK, S/O LATE BAKHARI BHAGAT @ RAMDHANI PRASAD, R/O THANA ROAD, WARISALIGANJ, P.O. & P.S WARISALIGANJ, DISTT-NAWADA. -PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH COMMISSIONER, SUGAR DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR PATNA. 2. THE COMMISSIONER CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, SUGAR CORPORATION LTD., SUGAR DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE GENERAL MANAGER, BIHAR STATE SUGAR CORPORATION UNIT, WARSALIGANJ, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NAWADA, 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NAWADA, 6. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, NAWADA. 7. THE BLOCK EXTENSION OFFICER, EAST WARISALIGANJ, DISTRICT-PATNA. 8. SHRI HARI MISTRY AKELA, SON OF LATE KAROO MISTRI, RESIDENT OF THANA ROAD, P.O. AND P.S. WARISALIGANJ, DISTRICT- NAWADA. -RESPONDENTS ******* For the Petitioner : M/s Bankey Bihari Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Sailendra Prasad For Sugar Corporation: Ms.Sujata Mukherjee For the State : Mr.P.K.Singh,SC.21. 2 13.08.2009 Heard Mr. Bankey Bihari Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Sujata Mukherjee, for the Sugar Corporation and P.K. Singh, learned Standing Counsel 2 no.21, for the State. In view of the order we propose to pass it is not necessary to issue notice to respondent no.8. However, if respondent no.8 feels aggrieved by the order he will be at liberty to file application for recalling the present order. The grievance of the petitioner is that many fake certificates are being issued and representations have been made before respondents no.4 and 5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the contentions raised, we call upon respondents no.4 and 5 to look into the matter and take any appropriate action in accordance with law. With this observation, the application is disposed of. (P.K. Misra, CJ.) (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) AAhmad 3