IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 22509 of 2007 Between: Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd, a Public Ltd Company, having their reg. office at 7-1-27, Ameerpet,Hyderabad, Rep.by the Authorised Signatory and Director(Legal),Sri N.L.Narsimha Das ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State Of A.P, Department of Assignments,Saifabad,Hyderabad, Rep.by the Principal Secretary 2 The Dist Collector, Ranga Reddy Dist, Lakdikapool,Hyderabad 3 The Senior Grade Deputy Collector and the Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranga Reddy Dist East Zone, Hyderabad 4 The Deputy Collector and Tahsildar, Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dist .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of Mandamus or other appropriate order or direction in the nature of writ directing the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful enjoyment and possession of the petitioner over the land admeasuring Ac.10-20 gts in Sy.No.44 of Bachupally (V), Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dist pending disposal of the Revision petition filed by the petitioner before the Dist Collector in the interest of justice and pass such other or further orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.NALIN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 22509 of 2007 Order: By this writ petition, the petitioner-Company seeks to direct the respondents not to interfere with its possession and enjoyment of the land admeasuring Ac.10-20 guntas situated in Survey No.44 of Bachupally village, Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the revision petition filed by them before the 2nd respondent-District Collector. Today, when the matter is taken up for admission, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequent to filing of the writ petition, the 2nd respondent-District Collector has passed status quo orders in the revision petition filed by the petitioner, and in view of the status quo orders passed by the 2nd respondent-District Collector in the revision petition, no orders need be passed in this writ petition. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is closed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 18.06.2008 Ksr/Nsr