IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (c. G.) $ijnglo Bench CR.M.P. No. W75 OF 2011 APPLICANT Smt. M.W. Uma Devi W/o W. A. Raju, aged about 54 years, R/o a WWW Wireless Colony, Qr. No. 1460/4 P R No ................................. Presamed by oLémW Halmukam Banglayard Qr.No. NON-APPLICANT State of Chhattisgarh through The Collector/ Station House Officer, Police Station — Tarbahar Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 48g OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 naied ........... .Cl... ..../............ 1 10/4 Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS \ mm(W§u) ammféw 3911mm WWW WW§F§$®$§R éwfm am SE : Hon‘bie $hri Manindra i‘v‘mh an $hrivastava, J. 9&98u2911. $hri Dharmesh Si'nrivastava, counsei for {he Detitioner. $hr‘l Vaibhav Goverdham Panei Lawyer for the State. Learned counsei for the petitioner submits thar on i’ne report of the petiiioner regarding theft of arrioies inciuding ornaments, the poiice registered case against the accused persons. Eariier; ihe eetiiicner fiied appiication for interim custody of the ornaments which was reiected. A petition was tiied before this Cc urt against the order of rejection, which was finaiiy disposed‘ off vide order o‘ated iii/‘3“) in CriViF NoiiSI'm directing that the triai ,be conciuded in six months and the point of reieasing the articies on $upurdiginama was ’eft open for the triai Court. As the triai was not con iud’ed within time stipuiatee", the petitioner again moved an appiication to reiease of seized articie which was again rejected vide order dated 2W 1720112 The petitioner again preferred a petition before this Court regis ered as CriviP No.?5iti. That petition was dismisseo‘ however, the Court directeo the that (Eourt to proceed under f $ections 82, 8'3 and 299 of Cr C anci conciude the triai as eariy as possibie preterabiv within four months fr m the date of tiiing of the copy of the orcter. ‘: Learned counset for th petitioner submits that even thereafter. r though the triai Court proceed d with the matter, as the accused persons i are abscondingr, permanent wa rant of arrest has been issued and the éourt is unabie to proceed with th triai and the case has been ciosed. He XI-ECw78 mm (Wu) ?5 W31 m zoo ammfaaw WWW wmawm‘ v—R, wwwt‘iwm amifcmm absconding, no further procee Ought to have ordered for inter -\ " ""régé¢i%d vide grdgrxdated 23 ,. {.A appiicationgzforvimErim custod in the changed circumstances arising on account of order dated 11i4; r; appropriate appiication befor ’ ' considered ahd the Court sha§ .riawf'taking into consideration.t ""fac€”tr?‘a't‘tne.t‘ri‘aHixis {)a pot iikeiy n, of.the ornaments. (‘r l "The. petitiorf ié‘finaiiv drsprosecgff/e// Deepti submits that in this changed circumstances when on account of accused :iing in the triai is possibie, the Court beiow im custody of the ornaments En favour of the action of petttioner‘s apptication for interim 120117, a petition was preferred which was “/2011. The petitioner has not moved any 2011. Therefore, the petitioner may move the be a pass necessary orders in accordance with he reievant aspects of the case inctuding the to conciude eariy: after making necessarv 3 Court beiow. The same shait / // / Sdl—han Shr'wasmva ManindYaJuége MO