C.O.C.P. No.100 of 2008 Present: Shri Sukhdev Kamboj, Advocate, for the petitioner. Let two copies of this petition be handed over to Shri S.S. Sahu, learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, during course of the day, who shall have instructions in the matter on the adjourned date. Adjourned to 27.3.2008. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge C.O.C.P. No.101 of 2008 Present: Shri Virender Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Let four copies of this petition be handed over to Shri R.S. Kundu, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, during course of the day, who shall have instructions in the matter on the adjourned date. Adjourned to27.3.2008 January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge C.O.C.P. No.102 of 2008 Present: Shri Baltej Singh Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Let notice of motion issue to the respondents to show cause as to why proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act be not initiated against them, returnable on 27.3.2008. Personal appearance shall, however, remain exempt till further orders. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge C.O.C.P. No.103 of 2008 Present: Shri D.R. Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Let five copies of this petition be handed over to Shri S.S. Sahu, learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, during course of the day, who shall have instructions in the matter on the adjourned date. Adjourned to 27.3.2008. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge C.O.C.P. No.104 of 2008 Present: Shri Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Let notice of motion issue to the respondents to show cause as to why proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act be not initiated against them, returnable on 27.3.2008. Personal appearance shall, however, remain exempt till further orders. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge C.O.C.P. No.105 of 2008 Present: Shri Ishwar Lal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Let two copies of this petition be handed over to Shri S.S. Sahu, learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, during course of the day, who shall have instructions in the matter on the adjourned date. Adjourned to 27.3.2008. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge C.O.C.P. No.106 of 2008 Present: Shri R.K. Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Let five copies of this petition be handed over to Shri S.S. Sahu, learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, during course of the day, who shall have instructions in the matter on the adjourned date. Adjourned to 27.3.2008. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge C.O.C.P. No.107 of 2008 Present: Shri Ishwar Lal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Let three copies of this petition be handed over to Shri S.S. Sahu, learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, during course of the day, who shall have instructions in the matter on the adjourned date. Adjourned to 27.3.2008. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge C.O.C.P. No.109 of 2008 Present: Shri Ramesh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Let two copies of this petition be handed over to Shri S.S. Sahu, learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, during course of the day, who shall have instructions in the matter on the adjourned date. Adjourned to 27.3.2008. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.404 of 2008 Date of decision: January 23, 2008. Jaswant Singh & Anr. ...Petitioner(s) v. Gian Singh & Anr. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest. Present: Shri Gurcharan Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. ORDER Surya Kant, J. - This Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 5.12.2007 passed by the learned District Judge, Patiala, partly allowing the appeal preferred by the respondent – plaintiff against the order dated 27.9.2007 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Patiala and as a consequence thereto, an application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC, has been partly accepted and the petitioner – defendants have been “restrained from alienating any specific khasra numbers out of the suit land measuring 105 kanals 19 marlas, as fully described in the head-note of the plaint, till the final decision of the suit”. Briefly stated, the case of the respondent – plaintiffs is that they, along with the petitioners, were co-sharers in total land measuring 324 kanals 7 marlas. Partition proceedings were initiated and orders to partition their respective shares have already been passed by the competent authority and site plans A, B and C have also been prepared. Similarly, Sanad Taksim had been prepared and warrants of possession have also been issued by the Assistant Collector 1st Grade, Patiala. These orders have been upheld upto the Revisional Authority. At this juncture, when each shareholder is likely to get exclusive possession of khasra numbers allocated to him as per the share(s), the injunction sought by the respondent – plaintiff against the petitioners to restrain them from alienating specific khasra numbers, which would create third party interests and, thus, multiply litigation between the parties, is fully justified and no exception an be taken to the order passed by the learned District Judge. Dismissed. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.410 of 2008 Date of decision: January 23, 2008. Dr. Ved Parkash Aggarwal ...Petitioner(s) v. Smt. Shashi Gupta & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest. Present: Mrs. Seema Pasricha, Advocate for the petitioner. ORDER Surya Kant, J. - This Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 5.12.2007 passed by the Rent Controller, Chandigarh whereby an application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC moved by the petitioner for his impleadment in the eviction proceedings filed by Sadhu Ram Gupta (since deceased and represented by his legal representatives) against the respondent – tenant (Anil Thapar, proprietor of M/s Master Fasteners), has been dismissed. The petitioner wanted his impleadment, inter-alia, on the ground that the subject property was allotted jointly in the names of the petitioner, Sadhu Ram Gupta, Gian Chand Gupta and Bal Krishan, who were partners in a partnership firm. He alleges that finally the three partners relinquished their respective shares in favour of the petitioner who, in turn, gave some signed blank papers to Sadhu Ram Gupta in the year 1993-94 so as to initiate proceedings for eviction of the tenant. Sadhu Ram Gupta is alleged to have procured a court decree dated 21.5.1994 regarding ownership of the subject property though, according to Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, the said decree pertains to 2/3rd share only. According to Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, the above stated civil court decree has already been challenged by the petitioner in a separate civil suit. In these circumstances when the inter-se dispute qua the ownership of the disputed premises between the petitioner and the legal heirs of Sadhu Ram Gupta cannot be decided in these eviction proceedings and is rather pending adjudication before the learned Civil Court, no fault can be found with the impugned order, more so when earlier also such an application moved by the petitioner was dismissed by the Rent Controller on 15.10.2001. Consequently, I do not find any legal infirmity with the impugned order. The Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. However, the aforesaid observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the civil suit which the petitioner is stated to have filed against Sadhu Ram Gupta and/or his legal representatives. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.403 of 2008 Date of decision: January 23, 2008. Kulwant Singh ...Petitioner(s) v. Charanjit Kaur ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest. Present: Shri Brijeshwar Singh Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner. ORDER Surya Kant, J. - This Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 22.11.2007 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Moga whereby the respondent – wife has been granted interim maintenance for herself and her minor child @ Rs.2,000/- per month, apart from Rs.5,000/- towards litigation expenses. The aforesaid order is impugned on the solitary ground that the agricultural land measuring 10 kanals has already been “given” to the respondent – wife as a source of livelihood, therefore, she has sufficient means to maintain herself. The aforementioned contention was raised before the learned Additional District Judge also, who has rightly repelled the same after observing that the possession of 10 kanals of agricultural land has been given to the respondent – wife for the limited purposes only, with a clear rider that she cannot alienate the same. It is too difficult to accept that the respondent would be able to sustain herself and the minor child from the maximum expected of the agricultural land, possession whereof is claimed to have been given to the respondent. Consequently, no case to interfere with the impugned order is made out. Dismissed. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge Civil Revision No. of 2008 C.O.C.P. No. of 2008 Present: Shri , Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Sahu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Shri R.S. Kundu, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Shri , Advocate, for the respondents. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge Civil Revision No. of 2008 C.O.C.P. No. of 2008 Present: Shri , Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Sahu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Shri R.S. Kundu, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Shri , Advocate, for the respondents. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge Civil Revision No. of 2008 C.O.C.P. No. of 2008 Present: Shri , Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Sahu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Shri R.S. Kundu, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Shri , Advocate, for the respondents. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge Civil Revision No. of 2008 C.O.C.P. No. of 2008 Present: Shri , Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Sahu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Shri R.S. Kundu, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Shri , Advocate, for the respondents. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge Civil Revision No. of 2008 C.O.C.P. No. of 2008 Present: Shri , Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Sahu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Shri R.S. Kundu, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Shri , Advocate, for the respondents. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge Civil Revision No. of 2008 C.O.C.P. No. of 2008 Present: Shri , Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Sahu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Shri R.S. Kundu, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Shri , Advocate, for the respondents. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge Civil Revision No. of 2008 C.O.C.P. No. of 2008 Present: Shri , Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Sahu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Shri R.S. Kundu, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Shri , Advocate, for the respondents. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge Civil Revision No. of 2008 C.O.C.P. No. of 2008 Present: Shri , Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Sahu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Shri R.S. Kundu, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Shri , Advocate, for the respondents. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge Civil Revision No. of 2008 C.O.C.P. No. of 2008 Present: Shri , Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Sahu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Shri R.S. Kundu, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Shri , Advocate, for the respondents. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge Civil Revision No. of 2008 C.O.C.P. No. of 2008 Present: Shri , Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Sahu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Shri R.S. Kundu, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Shri , Advocate, for the respondents. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge Civil Revision No. of 2008 C.O.C.P. No. of 2008 Present: Shri , Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Sahu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Shri R.S. Kundu, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Shri , Advocate, for the respondents. January 23, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge