SCA/9494/2003 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 9494 of 2003 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI ============================================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ============================================================== REMILABEN PANAJI - Petitioner(s) Versus POLICE COMMISSIONER & 1 - Respondent(s) ============================================================== Appearance : MR ASHISH M DAGLI for Petitioner(s) : 1, MS REETA CHANDARANA, AGP for Respondent(s) : 1 - 2. ================================================================== CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI Date : 23/03/2006 ORAL JUDGMENT 1.In the present petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 16.3.2002 by which she was discharged from service. The impugned order suggests that while still under unconfirmed service, the petitioner was found to have remained unauthorizedly absent on number of occasions. SCA/9494/2003 2/2 JUDGMENT 2.Learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that at the relevant time, the petitioner had number of personal difficulties and misfortunes and that the petitioner has now separated from her husband and she is living alone with her child. He submitted that some of the penalties which the Authorities have taken into consideration were later on set aside by the Appellate Authority. He submitted that sympathetic view may be taken since the petitioner requires the service for her sustenance. 3.Learned advocate for the petitioner further submitted that the petitioner would like to bring all these aspects of the matter to the authorities for reconsideration of the order passed by the petitioner. If the petitioner makes a representation to respondent No.2 within a period of two weeks from today, the same will be considered and disposed of within a period of four months from the date of such representation. I have expressed no opinion on the rival contentions. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Direct service. (Akil Kureshi, J.) (vjn)