1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.03.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P.(MD).No.2612 of 2011 Ipan ... Petitioner Vs 1. The State rep. by The Superintendent of Police Nagercoil Kanyakumari District 2. The Inspector of Police Karungal Police Station Kanyakumari District ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the first respondent to investigate the matter and to file final report in Crime No. 111 of 2010 dated 17.03.2010. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Muthuvijayapandian For Respondents : Mr.L.Murugan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the first respondent to investigate the matter and to file final report in Crime No. 111 of 2010 dated 17.03.2010. 2. Heard Mr.P.Muthuvijayapandian, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.L.Murugan, learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner has preferred a complaint to the second respondent against the accused persons and the second respondent received the complaint and had issued receipt, but no action has been taken. He would further submit in his argument that again the petitioner has preferred a complaint to the first respondent on 06.02.2010, and in that also, no action has been taken. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioner has preferred a private complaint before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Iraniel, on 22.02.2010 and the same was taken on file by the learned Judicial Magistrate and subsequently referred the same to the respondent police under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C., for investigation and to register a case under Section 325 of IPC. He would further submit in his argument that the respondent registered a case in Crime No. 111 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 of 2010 for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307 and 397 of IPC., but no action has been taken. Therefore, he would request the Court that a direction may be issued to the respondent to complete the investigation and to file a final report in Crime No. 111 of 2010 on the file of respondents. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit in his argument that on the complaint given by the petitioner, a case has been registered in Crime No. 111 of 2010 for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307 and 397 of IPC., and the investigation will be expeditously done and it will be over soon and the final report will be filed very soon. 5. Considering the submissions made by both sides, this Court is inclined to record the submissions of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) and to direct the first respondent to investigate the case in Crime No. 111 of 2010 as expeditiously as possible and to file a final report, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the above said direction, this Petition is disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(P&A) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Superintendent of Police Nagercoil Kanyakumari District 2. The Inspector of Police Karungal Police Station Kanyakumari District 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai Crl.O.P.(MD).No.2612 of 2011 vsg SMA/17.3.2011/4C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/