IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1242 of 2007 Date of decision:- 27.07.2009. Kailash Devi ...Petitioner Versus Mohinder Pal and others ...Respondent s CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present:- Mr. Kunal Mulwani, Advocate for Mr. Vishal Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. RAKESH KUMAR GARG J. In this petition, the grouse of the petitioner is that despite a restrain order passed by this Court on 31st March, 2006, the respondents have executed the sale deed on 02.06.2006 and thus violated the interim order passed by this Court in Civil Revision No.1843 of 2006. In reply to the show cause notice, issued by this Court, respondent Nos.1 and 2 have placed on record the copy of the decree-sheet dated 03.02.2009 passed in Civil Suit No.RBT-31 of 2007 whereby the main suit filed by the petitioner for declaration with consequential relief of joint possession has been dismissed. The respondents have also placed on record the judgment dated 21.01.2008 passed by this Court in C.R. No.1843 of 2006 whereby the revision petition has already been disposed of by issuing directions to the respondents to disclose the status of the present suit in all subsequent transactions, which they enter into in respect of the property in dispute. COCP No. 1242 of 2007 -2- In view of the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to proceed further the present contempt petition. Rule discharged. July 27, 2009 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) vj Judge