HSGH COURT 3F $HHATTE$$ARH : BiLilSPUR Writ Peti€§on {53 No. 1325 of 2689 'PETITIGNER “BL. Mandioi, Slo Late Rama Mandwk aged about 66 yeafs, R/e \Jiliage Daihan, Past Ja§uioia, District Rajnandgaon (CG). Versus RE$PONDENT$ State of Ch‘na‘ttisgaa’h through Secretaw, Triba} Weifare Department, Mamalaya,‘ D.K.S. Ehawan, Raipu? (CG. ' ccoumam Genez'a, fi of th Accountan Gener Raipur, Dismct Rainur (CG). 3'} Senior Acccunis Gfficer, ofice o Aoouan’t $eneri, sct Ra§9uf {C5}. W Ptii 2 he Cn in (rit eion under Articie 26 of i onstiiu€io of dia‘} ' ngieBch: Holei Satish Agih 5 Sienr h’bShr K. .‘notri, .. resen M oop zumda Advoca for e eoner. . Pankajrivoiava forthe Sate. r. R. ghei, standing couei for the rpondents No. 3. 3. M S Ba ns es 2 GRN. $RDE§ iassea on thi 2&3“ oiay of Maroh, zoQQf Pi s XT it nsem of iameo? coonsei peaiéng for the game's. the mater is ~ eafd ii 2 Lernd ue g for e ti e bin ) ae consi appearin %h peiioner submits that ih case, eg payment of retifa} beofiis ma ay e reerred t "rhe pensi commrii 3 ~ Thi Crt, thhearty W..N.4640 Beijnra a! Vs. Th ) s ou in e/ of Po2l264 (at Mmie e State of hhrrigarh & ’ihers} n her c‘omecte rrratters,‘~ire¢ted the C t te mt f ri uee e ommittee o consider h ater o etrat d as th dtseuted question of facts were invotved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dateoi ’i9—Q6—2006 passed in WP.NG.1981I20G6 (Smt. Keia Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Governmerit of Chhattisgarh and others), and order giateri 13—a-2008 passed in MCC. Ne. 1'05 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh amt others Vs. Baig'nath Manda! and another). thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment ano/ora‘er dated 31. ii Jamary, ZGQ8 passed; in WPNO. 45422604 (Baijnathri‘viandai {supra} as submitted by. ieamed counsei appearing for the parties. , ‘. ) 2) A i ofce e t aL f f cm a Dim . Pt: v r; An Mar, m m ptm ‘ Mr Sha i Wh co e ap i h finay. e am m b f o on ee. Cas o ad ot d d 4) Th§s pe?:§tion is accerciingiy disposed Ot‘ in the same ‘Lerms i.e., ihe offhze of the Advocate Genera} is directed ta Send the case tc the Committee, wi‘thm a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of W5 am’er as wel} as a copy 0f the pemion fmm the pe%§?ioner. Thereaftea’, the Commmee'shail iesue netice to the petiiioner and officem concerned within a ‘a‘urthei’ peried of 15 days. The Commiit‘ee shaii consider and pass Cider} in accomiance with iaw: aiter afford‘mg pmper cpportunity of hearing io the peiiiicner. The ce‘iiiicnef and ‘i‘ne oiiicers concerned may iiie adeiitioneir documenis, if neeeesery. The eniiie exeicise, inciuding paymeni of reiirai dues, if aay, t0 the pe’tiiionef, ee compieied Within a eeiied of four menths imm ine éaie oi receipi of a copy 0f +!inis ' order. 5} The petiiiener shaii Suppiy one comeiete 3e? of ine petiticn i0 ine S‘teie counsei as weli as counsei for i‘ne reseondems No.2 & 3 for rensfei’n‘ng ine same 'io the Sommitiee. 8) in case of grievance with regard to non-paymeni of pensionery euee, ii is not necessary to fiie a writ petition berere thie Court direoiiy. ihe reoresentetion/appiica‘iion can be moved before the Pension Commii‘zee es siei'ed above. The Pension Commii‘tee Sheii not refuee to entertain the represen‘tationiappiicaiion, ié‘ so fiied direciiy. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri ‘1‘ Judge ‘ i