1 ndm 2 rpw.114.10 anr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 114 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1831 OF 2010 Molasahab Dawal Shaikh and ors. ... PETITIONERS Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ... RESPONDENTS ­­­­­­­­ Mr. Vishwasrao S. Deokar for the Petitioners. Mr. Vijay Killedar i/b Mr. Madhav Jamdar for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. ­­­­­­­­ CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR and R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATE : 02 nd July, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2 This review petition is to recall and set aside the order dated 15 th March, 2010 passed in Writ Petition No. 1831 of 2010. The principal grievance of the Petitioners is that it has now come to the notice of the Petitioners that the Respondent – Zilla Parishad acting upon the instructions issued by the State Government has appointed one Dagde Mahesh Asaram. According to the Petitioners, they are similarly placed 2 as that of the said Dagde Mahesh Asaram. The argument has been countered by the counsel for the Zilla Parishad. Our attention is invited to the appointment order of said Dagde Mahesh Asaram dated 22 nd February, 2010. The appointment is obviously made against category VIH (Apang) that means the said candidate was appointed against the category of physically disabled person and the post reserved for that category. None of the Petitioners have claimed that they belong to the said category of physically disabled person. In that view of the matter, we see no reason to review our order. Hence rejected. [ R.M. SAVANT, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]