:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1797 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1797 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1797 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3858 OF 2000 WRIT PETITION NO. 3858 OF 2000 WRIT PETITION NO. 3858 OF 2000 Govind Anna Kadam & Anr. ..Petitioners versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Shri Vinod Jadhav i/b. Shri Vijay Patil for the Petitioners. CORAM : R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & CORAM : R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & CORAM : R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 24TH AUGUST, 2006 DATE : 24TH AUGUST, 2006 DATE : 24TH AUGUST, 2006 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : . Learned Advocate for the Petitioners state that in order to enable the Petitioners to take appropriate steps in relation to his incorrect information submitted by the Respondent No.1 to this Court which has caused prejudice to the Petitioners, particularly, in relation to the property which was already sold by the Respondents to the Petitioner and the said fact was suppressed at the time when certain assertions were made before this Court in Writ Petition filed by the said Respondents against :2: the Acquiring Body, the petitioners crave leave to withdraw this Application. Application is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of accordingly. Meanwhile at the request of the learned Advocate for the Petitioners, parties shall maintain statusquo in relation to the land in question for a period of four weeks. (R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. ) (R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. ) (R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. ) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)