1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5436 OF 2010 Pandit Vithalrao Dhumal and others. ..Petitioners V/s Trimbakrao Shrirangrao Bhise and others. ..Respondents ......... Mr.Vivek Bhavthankar, Advocate for petitioners. Mr.E.P. Sawant holding for Mahesh Kale, Advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2. ........ (CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) DATE : 23rd June, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The petitioners are aggrieved due to omission of issue no.1, which was earlier framed by the learned Collector, Latur in the proceedings of Case No.ZPPS/1/2010. The petitioners are facing action about disqualification under the provisions of Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Act, 1987. The Collector framed certain preliminary issues and decided to hear both the sides on those preliminary issues. The contention of the petitioners is that whip issued by the unauthorised person, and therefore, there was no obligation on them to obey the same. Therefore, they claimed that they were not under legal obligation and could not have incurred disqualification due to disobedience of 2 such whip. The authority of the person issuing whip may be considered by the Collector at subsequent stage, if so required. The discretionary order of considering only few issues as preliminary issues does not require any interference in extra ordinary jurisdiction. Petition is disposed of. (V.R.KINGAONKAR) JUDGE gas/wp5436.10