IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22534 of 2009 1. MAHADEO YADAV 2. MD. NASIM AKHTAR @ NASIM AKHTAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 11.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Nobody appears on behalf of the State. Two petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted on the strength of a complaint registered under Sections 406,420 and 120B of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that complaint may qualify for an enquiry by the authorities but not initiating a prosecution. Prosecution case is that the accused persons conniving with each other prepared a list of beneficiaries eligible person. Name of complainant was not included therein. It is not the case of the complainant that his name figured in the list and relief amount was allocated but the same was not paid to him. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of 04 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Katihar in connection with Complaint case no. 2719 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 ( 2) of the Cr.P.C. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)