IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.15338 of 2011 Date of Decision : August 23, 2011. Kamlesh Kumar and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.S.Manhas, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.P.C.Goel, Addl. AG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.P.C.Goel, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioners who are working as Pump Operators/Fitter Helper/Beldar/Mali-cum-Chowkidars in the Department of Water Supply and Sanitation, Government of Punjab, seek a mandamus for the grant of the revised pay scales recommended by various Pay Commissions with regard to skilled and semi-skilled staff in the services of the Punjab CWP No.15338 of 2011 [2] Government. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involved in this case stands settled by this Court in favour of the petitioners vide a decision rendered in a bunch of writ petitions including CWP No.116 of 2009 (Rajinder Kumar and others versus State of Punjab and others decided on 9.7.2009 which has been upheld in LPA No.1024 of 2009 (State of Punjab and others versus Rajinder Kumar and others) decided on 30.8.2010. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the aforesaid decisions in Rajinder Kumar's case (supra) with a direction that let the claim of of the petitioners be also considered in the light of the said decision. Dasti. August 23, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE