IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13590 of 2005 LAL BIHARI YADAV S/O LATE GHUGHLI YADAV R/O AMARTHA, PS-KARAKAT(GORFARI) DISTT-ROHTAS -----------------------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE D.M., ROHTAS 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ROHTAS,DIHRI 4. THE OFFICE INCHARGE KARAKAT AT GORARI--RESPONDENTS ----------- 3 9.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The only explanation offered by the petitioner for coming before this court for payment of salary having remained due since 1990 is repeated representations before the respondent. That is no ground for approaching the Court after so many years on the issue of payment of salary which any way most of the time is found to be controversial on various circumstances. This Court is not willing to give any categorical direction in favour of the petitioner, but if the petitioner convinces the respondent about the bona fide of his claim he may do so by moving the respondents. This writ application is dismissed with the above liberty. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)