IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 21ST MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 2527 of 2010(M) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- KOTTAKKARAN MOIDU, S/O.BAPPAN, PUNNOLI HOUSE, P.O.PERODE, VIA.NADAPURAM, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.K.V.SOHAN, SMT.SREEJA SOHAN.K. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, NADAPURAM, P.O.KALLACHI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KOZHIKODE. R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.BIJOY CHANDRAN. R1 BY ADV. MR.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B . THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/02/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J --------------------------- W.P(C) No.2527 of 2010-M ---------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of February, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved of the steps being taken by the respondent in drawing the electrical line through the property of the petitioner, which has been strongly objected by filing necessary petition before the second respondent. It is also contended in the Writ Petition that, despite the proceedings are stated as finalised by the second respondent by passing appropriate orders, copy of the same has not been served to the petitioner so far; virtually preventing the petitioner from pursuing any further steps to challenge the same, if not favourable. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent submits that they also have not received a copy of the order No.D2-16053/08 dtd.13.1.2010 stated as passed by the second respondent on Ext.P1. 3. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the second respondent submits that the said respondent has already passed the order and that the steps are being taken to forward the W.P(C) No.2527 of 2010-M 2 same to all concerned. 4. In the above facts and circumstances, the second respondent is directed to forward a copy of the order stated as passed on Ext.P1 application to the petitioner by 'registered post' with acknowledgment due, within 'two' weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. So as to enable the petitioner to pursue the matter further, the order stated as passed by the second respondent, if detrimental to the interest of the petitioner, shall be kept in abeyance for a further period of two weeks thereafter. The Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE //True Copy// P.A to Judge ab W.P(C) No.2527 of 2010-M 3