IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3637/2011 MORESHWAR BHUJANGRAO NIWALKAR AND ORS ..V.S. BHUJANGRAO SITARAM NIWALKAR AND ANOR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Dhawas, adv for petitioner. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK J. DATE : AUGUST, 16 2011. Heard Shri Dhawas for the petitioner. By this petition, the petitioner impugns the order passed by the trial court on 24.3.2011, rejecting the amendment application filed by the petitioner for amendment of the plaint. On hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of the impugned order dated 24.3.2011 it appears that the impugned order is just and proper and does not suffer from any infirmity. The application was filed by the petitioner seeking amendment of pleadings at an extremely belated stage when the matter was posted for arguments. The trial court further found that the proposed amendment was not necessary for effectively deciding the controversy between the parties. Since the impugned order dated 24.3.2011 is just and proper, the same calls for no interference in exercise of the writ jurisdiction. In the result the writ petition fails and is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE SMP