IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 31ST JANUARY 2011 / 11TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1628 of 2011(C) ------------------------------------ PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. CHANDRAN, PANAKKAL VEEDU, MANAPPALLY (THEKKUM MURI), PAVAMPA, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. PANKAJAVALLY, PANAKKAL VEEDU, MANAPPALLY (THEKKUM MURI), PAVAMPA, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI. RESPONDENT: ---------------------- THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-690 518. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/01/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.1628 OF 2011(C) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T On the strength of Ext.P2 registered Will, which is stated to have been executed by the petitioners' father in their favour, claiming that the petitioners' brother has been unheard for more than 7 years, petitioners applied for mutation of the property which is declined. It is thereupon that this writ petition has been filed. 2. In my view, having regard to the above, petitioners will have to approach a Civil Court and get a decree and it is only on that basis, can the petitioners claim mutation of the property. In that view of the matter, I do not think this case warrants interference by this court. Writ petition is closed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :