Q K “(RE BENQH ‘ J@ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (c.G.‘[ w.P. s No. D 2010 PETITIONER Kunwar Singh aged about 55 years, S/o- Sumeli Gond, Permanent Gangman, posted at i Akaltara, Sub Division Janjgir, P.W.D. District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) R/o- viilage-Raseda, Tahsil- Akaitara, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. i State of Chhattisgarh, Throué'n the Secretary, Department of ‘Public Works, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Sub Divisional omcer, Public Works Department, Sub- Division Janjgir, District— Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (y WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 1310 of2010 : Kunwar Singh. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & another. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri F.S.Khare, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Dy. A.G. for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL r (Passed on 29‘ day of March, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage. However, he prays that the responaent authorities may be directed to consider and decide the pending representation dated 10.02.2010 (Annexure P/l) as expeditiously as possible. 2. Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, learned counsel appearing for the State/ respondents submits that in the event, the representation, as aforestated, is pending consideration, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance With law, on its own merit and perspective, within a period of eight weeks hom the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. 3. In View of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication in this petition at this stage. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.