IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 6058 OF 2009 Between: Rami Reddy and another ..... PETITIONERS AND G.Adinarayanappa .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioners: Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 6058 OF 2009 ORDER : The defendants in O.S.No.129 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Hindupur are the revision petitioners. The respondents herein filed the said suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants/revision petitioners from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. Pending the suit, they filed I.A.No.208 of 2006 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of Civil Procedure Code for temporary injunction and after hearing both the parties, the trial Court allowed the application by order dated 18.12.2006. The said order of temporary injunction granted by the trial Court was confirmed by learned Senior Civil Judge, Hindupur, while dismissing C.M.A.No.2 of 2007 preferred by the revision petitioners/defendants. Aggrieved by the same, the present revision petition is filed. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and having perused the material on record, I do not find any justifiable reason to interfere with the concurrent findings of the facts recorded by the Courts below, while granting the temporary injunction in favour of the respondents. Hence, the interference by this Court is not warranted. However, the main suit may be disposed of expeditiously following due process of law. Accordingly, subject to the above, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. _____________ G. ROHINI, J. Date: 01.02.2010 Note: Issue CC within one week (B/O) Ivd