IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1593 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO.1593 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO.1593 OF 2005 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (L) NO.564 OF 2005 (L) NO.564 OF 2005 (L) NO.564 OF 2005 IN IN IN ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 333 OF 2003 PETITION NO. 333 OF 2003 PETITION NO. 333 OF 2003 Virendra Ramesh Mehta .. Applicant V/s M/s.Bharatkumar Dhaneshchandra .. Respondent ----- Sou.Kavita Shobha i/b. Shri.A.G.Shah for the Applicant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 10TH MARCH, 2006. : 10TH MARCH, 2006. : 10TH MARCH, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant. None appears for the Respondent. By this Notice of Motion, the Applicant is seeking condonation of 15 days delay. Perused the Notice of Motion and the affidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a). 2. The learned Counsel for the Appellant undertakes to file affidavit of service within a period of two weeks from today. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)