R.S.A No. 1770 of 2009 (O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A No. 1770 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : August 13, 2009 Ram Chand, ...... Appellant (s) v. Dona Ram and others, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. P.S.Jammu, Advocate for the appellant. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) C.M.No.5162 of 2009 For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 3 days in filing the appeal is condoned. C.M stands disposed of. R.S.A No.1770 of 2009 This appeal has been filed against concurrent judgments of the Courts below dismissing the suit of the appellant for permanent injunction restraining the respondents from digging a tubewell and installing an electric connection over the land which was owned by the appellant. The following questions have been proposed :- “ I. Whether the impugned judgments and decrees R.S.A No. 1770 of 2009 (O&M) ::2:: passed by the Courts below are liable to be set aside ? II. Whether the Courts below have not appreciated the evidence in its true perspective ? III. Whether respondent No.1 can get the electric connection by forging and fabricating the signatures of the appellant on application as well as on affidavit of no objection ?” It would be seen that all the questions proposed are questions of fact. Counsel for the appellant has taken me through the findings recorded by both the Courts below but has not been able to persuade me that the findings recorded are either based on no evidence or are based on such misreading of evidence as would render the same perverse. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. As the main appeal has since been disposed of, all the pending civil miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) August 13, 2009. JUDGE `kk'