(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. Writ Petition No. 1810 of 2009 1. Shri Mate Bijasani Prathamik Vidya Mandir, Deopur, Dhule, Through its Head Mistress. 2. Head Mistress, Shri Mate Bijasani Prathamik Vidya Mandir, .. Petitioners Deopur, Dhule. (Original defendant 3. Shri Mate Bijasani Public Education Society, nos.1 to 3) Deopur, Dhule, Dist. Dhule. versus 1. Sau. Vidya Shriram Patil, Age : 33 years, Occupation : Service, .. Respondents R/o. 81, Krushi Colony, Dhule, (No.1 - Dist. Dhule. Original plaintiff, no.2 - 2. Administrative Officer, Original defendant Shikshan Mandal, Nagar Parishad, no.4 ) Dhule, Dist. Dhule. .................. Mr. S.P. Brahme, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Shrikant S. Patil, Advocate, for respondent no.1 caveator. .................. (2) CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 1ST JULY 2009. COURT’S ORDER : 1. By way of present petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 12th February 2009, passed by the learned 4th Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division), Dhule, below Exhibit 78 in Regular Civil Suit No. 57/1999, thereby rejecting the application filed by the present petitioners for framing preliminary issue with regard to jurisdiction. 2. However, the learned Counsel appearing for respondent no. 1 plaintiff, on the instructions of the respondent no.1, makes a statement that the respondent no.1 plaintiff would not proceed further with the suit and she would wilthdraw the suit, within a period of three weeks from today, so as to take recourse to alternate remedy by way of approaching the Deputy Director of Education / Education Officer for redressal of her grievance. 3. In that view of the matter, nothing survives in the petition. 4. The respondent no.1 shall be at liberty to approach the Deputy Director of Education / Education Officer for redressal of any of her grievances, if they survive, by making appropriate representation. If such representation is made, the Deputy Director of Education / Education Officer shall decide the same within a period of three months from the date of representation. (3) 5. With the above observations, the petition is disposed of. ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE ...................... bgp/1810wp