1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 688 OF 2010 Shri Sachindra Shivram Hegde & Anr. ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.Prakash Naik for the Applicants. Mrs.M.R. Tidke, APP for the State. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : MARCH 15, 2010 P.C. :- 1 Heard Counsel for the applicants and APP for the State. 2 This is a third application filed by the applicant for bail. It is submitted that the applicant is in jail since last two years. It is further submitted that the prosecution has examined only 11 witnesses. He, therefore, submitted that the applicant may be released on bail. 2 3 Perusal of the earlier order indicates that the applicant s Advocate did not inform this court that the applicant had, in fact, filed an application in this Court which was rejected by Brother D.B. Bhosale, J. on 11th November, 2008 in Criminal Application NO.2602/2008. It appears that this fact was suppressed from this Court that the second application was filed. On this very ground of suppression of fact, the applicant does not deserve to be released on bail. Apart from that, on two other occasions, his application has been rejected on merits. Thirdly, 11 witnesses have already been examined and trial has commenced. The trial court has requested that an extension of four months be given to complete the trial. 4 Extension is granted. The trial court is expected to complete the recording of evidence and dispose of the case within four months. 5 Application is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)