IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7753 of 2010 TINKU @ TABREJ Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 302/34 of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act is that the F.I.R. names three accused. The petitioner is not one of them. They are not alleged to have been accompanied by any unknown. His name has transpired in confession of a co-accused who himself is not an accused. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri. A. K. Jha, A.D.J., F.T.C. II, Bhagalpur in connection with Sessions Case No. 191/2009 (arising out of Audyogik Prakshetra P.S. Case No. 14/06). P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)