IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16153 of 2010 1. SHUSHIL KUMAR PATHAK 2. Prahalad Singh 3. Praveen Kumar Singh Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Shailesh Kumar ------ 2/ 21.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are alleged for realizing the money from consumers for opening their policy which was not complied. Policy could not be opened due to non-furnishing of relevant papers. They returned their money, realizing thereon informant has also compromised the case, as contained in Annexure-3 to the application. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Aurangabad(T) P.S. Case No. 308 of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Aurangabad subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)