( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.1183 of 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.1183 of 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.1183 of 2008 Balbhim @ Appa Vitthal Londhe ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Mr P. R. Arjunwadkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr R. S. Shinde, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. DATED : 03.06.2008. DATED : 03.06.2008. DATED : 03.06.2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant-accused and the learned A.P.P. for the respondent-State. 2. Perused application and the material available on record. 3. The applicant-accused is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with C.R. No.3 of 2008 under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential ( 2 ) Commodities Act registered with Mangalwedha Police Station. 4. By an order dated 2.5.2008 the applicant was directed to disclose as to whether next to road side of his Dhaba any agricultural land owned by him is situate. No affidavit in this behalf was filed. On 5.5.2008 when the learned counsel for the applicant was asked to file affidavit by 6.5.2008, he expressed his inability to file the affidavit for want of time. Consequently, the application was adjourned beyond vacation so as to seek compliance of the order of this Court. 5. Inspite of lapse of more than four weeks, no affidavit has been filed. Considering the attitude on the part of the applicant not to comply with the order passed by the Court, I am not inclined to entertain this application. 6. In the result, the application is rejected. 7. Any observation made in this order shall ( 3 ) not be construed as any finding or any expression of opinion on the merits of the case at the time of trial. JUDGE. JUDGE. JUDGE.