IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7104 of 2009 CHANDAN KUMAR SINGH @ SATISH CHANDRA GAUTAM, son of Subash Singh, resident of Vill.- Siswa Kharar, P.S. Kalyanpur, Distt.-East Champaran ---Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 7. 23.12.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also the informant. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a police case for the alleged offences registered under sections 364 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is to the effect that he as also co-accused Triloki Nath Singh alias T.N. Singh allegedly got disappeared the son of the informant as these two accused are alleged to have fetched money from him in the garb of providing service. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during investigation no material has come against the petitioner of his participation in the alleged crime. Learned counsel appearing for the informant submits that the petitioner does not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail since after obtaining the interim order on 4.3.2009, he misused the privilege and for this a complaint case was filed by one Murari Singh, who is a witnessed in this criminal case. Learned counsel for the petitioner, in reply, submits that as a matter of fact, one day prior to that, the uncle of this petitioner had filed a criminal case against said 2 Murari Singh and in retaliation the said criminal case was filed by aforesaid Murari Singh. The learned APP on perusal of the case diary points out that the material has come against co-accused Triloki Nath Singh alias T.N. Singh. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No.61/2008 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari (East Champaran) in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)