IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10476 of 2011 Santosh Kumar, son of Sri Chandeshwar ram, resident of village – Bhikhnachak, P S – Gardanibagh, P O – Anishabad, District – Patna. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Animal Husbandry, government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna. 2. The Director, Department of Animal Husbandry, Government of Bihar. 3. The Deputy Director, Department of Animal Husbandry, Government of Bihar, (Adarsh Gram Yojna), Bihar. ----------- 02. 12.9.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The objection raised by the counsel for the State prima facie seems to be correct. The claim of the petitioner cannot be considered for regularization or absorption after 17 years of his removal as would be evident from Annexure-1. Petitioner was removed by the impugned order with effect from 20.7.1993 and he has claimed his right for regularization / absorption on the basis of the circular issued by the State Government in 2005. Such benefit is to be extended to people who are in employment and not for whom who was removed from service 17 years ago. Writ has no merit. It is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)