1 Cri.A.136.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 136 OF 2010 [ Devgiri Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd. Jalna Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.S.B.Despande,Advocate for Applicant Shri.V.G.Shelke,APP for Resp.No.1-State. Shri.A.N.Raut,Advocate for Resp.No.2. .... CORAM: SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATE : 05TH APRIL, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard respective learned counsel for the parties. 2. This is an application preferred by the applicant-Original Complainant for condonation of delay of 23 days, caused in filing accompanying Criminal application seeking leave to file an appeal. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents opposed the present application 2 Cri.A.136.10 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders vehemently and submits that present application bears no substance and devoid of merits,and therefore, same be deserves to be dismissed. 4. For the reasons stated in the present Application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily. It also appears that the said delay is not willful, deliberate and intentional, and hence, same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 5. In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause [A] thereof, and delay of 23 days, caused in filing accompanying application seeking leave to file appeal stands condoned and present application stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- [SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J.] MTK 3 Cri.A.136.10 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders