HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ petition No. 3753 of 2001 (SS) (Old No. 20608/1996) Vipin Prakash Sharma & 67 others All are untrained Assistant Teachers Posted at District Haridwar ............ Petitioners Versus 1. State of U.P. 2. Director of Education (Basic) Nishatganj, U.P. Lucknow 3. District Basic Education Officer, Haridwar 4. The Registrar, Departmental Examination, U.P. at Allahabad 5. The Principal District Institute Education, Training (D.I.E.T.), Roorkee, Haridwar .............. Respondents Sri Rajendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioner Standing Counsel for the respondents. Dated: 4.3.2006 Hon. Rajesh Tandon,J. Heard the learned counsel for the parties at length. By the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a writ of certiorari quashing the orders dated 17.1.1996 and 18.3.1996 passed by the Director of Education (Basic) U.P. at Lucknow as well as a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in the completion of B.T.C. Training (Correspondence Course) from zila Shiksha Evam Prashikshan Sansthan, Roorkee, District Haridwar and to allow the petitioner to appear in the examination to be held in the second week of July 1996. By way of interim order dated 9.7.1996, the respondents were directed to allow the petitioner to complete the B.T.C. course and to permit them to appear in the examination. The order is quoted below: “Meanwhile the respondents are directed to allow the petitioner to complete the course of B.T.C. and to permit them to appear in the examination. However, the result shall be declared only under the orders of this Court.” Since the petitioners have already appeared in the examination, writ petition has already become infructuous. However, the result of the petitioners be declared. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Dated: 4.3.2006 Rajesh Tandon, J. *Dhyani