WP(C) 903/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA Heard Mr B. Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr B J Ghosh, learned state counsel. Considering the grievance raised in the writ petition and also as agreed to by l earned counsel appearing for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed o f at the motion stage itself. The petitioner’s case in brief is that the petitioner along with others have dul y applied before the respondent No. 2 for appointment as Jr. Inspector of Co-Ope rative Societies on the basis of requisition issued by the authority for filling up the existing and future vacancies. The respondent No. 2 has processed the ma tter and also obtain sanction of SLEC for filling up 308 posts of Jr. Inspector . On the other hand, Govt. while filling up such vacancies of Jr. Inspector deci ded to recruit under Regulation 3(f) of Assam Public Service Commission (APSC fo r short). The petitioner and similar others were under apprehension that the aut horities may adopt a policy of pick and choose. A writ application vide WP(C) No . 1511/05 was accordingly filed which has been disposed of as per order dated 25 .2.05 directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appoi ntment to the posts of Jr. Inspector of Cooperative Societies. Meanwhile the Go vernment has regularized 72 Jr. Inspector by virtue of a Cabinet decision and on the other hand keeping the matter of the petitioner and similarly situated pers ons pending indefinitely. In the circumstances the petitioner has submitted repr esentation on 9.11.09 before the Principal Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Co-o perative Department, Dispur, Guwahati, which has not been disposed of till date keeping the petitioner in dark about consideration of his appointment and hence the instant writ application for appropriate relief. In the above background, limited prayer of the petitioner is for a direction to respondent No. 1 to dispose of the representation dated 9.11.2009 within a time frame to which the learned state counsel has no objection. In view of the limited prayer so made, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 1 to dispose of the representation dated 9.11. 2009 so submitted by the petitioner with a speaking order within a period of fou r(4) weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. Along w ith the certified copy of this order, the petitioner shall submit a copy of the writ petition with the annexures appended thereto before the respondent No. 1 fo r doing the needful. It is needless to say that the order so passed by the respo ndent No. 1, shall be furnished to the petitioner at his given address.