IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M.No.M-15726 of 2008 Date of Decision : 1.8.2008. Pankaj Kamboj ..Petitioner. Vs. State of Punjab ..Respondent. CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present : Mr.P.S.Khurana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.I.P.S.Sidhu, Sr.DAG Punjab. Mr.S.P.S.Sidhu, Advocate for complainant. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. Pursuant to order dated 27.6.2008, the petitioner has joined investigation. This fact is not disputed by the counsel for the State on instructions received from ASI Harbhajan Singh and stated that the petitioner is no more required for custodial interrogation. However, counsel for the complainant has alleged that the petitioner should at least secure the future of his own daughter namely Suhani aged 5 years and should create fixed deposit in her name. The petitioner has today shown to the Court two FDs of Rs.50,000/- each in the name of her daughter Suhani for the period July 26, 2008 to July 26, 2018 and July 12, 2008 to July 12, 2018 respectively. Counsel for the petitioner has no objection in handing over the fixed deposit receipts to the counsel for the complainant but he prays that the petitioner may not be allowed to realise the fixed deposit amount till his Crl.M.No.M-15726 of 2008 -2- daughter attains majority. Counsel for the respondent has no objection to that. In view of the above, the aforesaid FDs are handed over to Mr.S.P.S.Sidhu, Advocate, counsel for the complainant, who is present in the Court. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is thus, allowed and order dated 27.6.2008 is made absolute. (Rakesh Kumar Jain) 1.8.2008 Judge Meenu