BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Tuesday, the Thirteenth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.11641 of 2011 CHINNAIAH :PETITIONER /ACCUSED SOLE -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NATHAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. CRIME NO.652/2011. :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/sole accused apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 341, 323 and 506(i) I.P.C. in Crime No.652 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner apprehending for arrest in Crime No.652 of 2011 and the case has been registered under sections 341, 323 and 506(i) I.P.C. and the alleged occurrence took place on 23.08.2011. He further submits that no one sustained injury in this case and the investigation is considerably over and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submits that no one sustained injury. He further submits that there are three previous cases are pending against the petitioner and the investigation is going on and hence he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, since the alleged occurrence took place on 23.08.2011 even though there are three cases are pending against the petitioner and he was already enlarged on anticipatory bail since he is having bad antecedent and even though the petitioner was not arrested he neither interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Natham, Dindigul District, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Natham, Dindigul District, and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. and 05.30 p.m. until further orders The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 13/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO:1.The Judicial Magistrate, Natham, Dindigul District. 2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Inspector of Police, Natham Police Station, Dindigul District. +1. CC to M/S. B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate SR.No.31096. RP/15.09.2011/1P/6C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11641 of 2011,Date :13/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/