c- s QO' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON No.JS2^^_/2006 Petitioner 1) Deepak Kumar Yadav, Aged about 27 years, S/o Chaitanya Yadav, PO: Badga, Tehsil: Marwahi, ,< ^^\ Dist. Bilaspur (CG) ^%^".-^) Smt Dhirajya Bai, ^",'€1^"'-.•••'"" Aged about 50 years, ..'s%^ ^y^-' ^^".. v>" Respondents W/o late Kaushal Prasad, PO: Badga, Tehsil: Marwahi, Dist. Bilaspur (CG) Versus y (1) South Eastern Coaffields Limited Through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director Seepat Road, Bilaspur(CG)-495006 / (2) Chief General Manager, South Eastem Coalfields Limited Hasdeo Area. / (3) Sub Area Manager, Malga colliery, Hasdeo Area. / •Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India. -^_L-_..._-.._.. XI-HC-22 3n^T«RT ^rwsn^r sbiifyleci Bar\'e ^r- 3^ '<ll<<lcl<4, CTTntf'IS, Rclltfy 3l 1^1 ^ftch *<1*«11SBHrai soo R<)«d 311^1 gWIWflfeT )-7- Shri G. IVIuWiopadhyay, Heard on admission. The main grtevance of the father-in-law of the petitioner No.} Kaushal Prasad was working as C| Hasdeo Area, who died in harnes^ 'titioner No.1 who is the son-in-la') ~:ssse^- The petitioner No.2 that is the wife the respondents to consider the cas| of late Kaushal Prasad to appoint other family member who is eligibte From perusal ofth.e petition,| petitionere have not delivered respondents, therefore, without exp| the petitioners are directed to mak^ triis petition and relevant doeument^ days and in turn respondent No.2 i| light of representation made by the| the date of receipt of representatjor) No.1 is entitledfor compassionate oompasslonate appoir'tment, then pei'tloner No.1 in aocorclance with With the direction aforesaid, Consequently, M.(W.)P. stand disposed of. Parties are entitled for certifi) courlselfor the petitioners. <t>l<<Il']<(1-1 111CTTS:teit'<R]«K ^sif^irsn^r (setitioners raised in this writ petition is that and husband of petitioner No.2 namely Ipper, Cat. IV, in the South Jhimar Colliery, on 12-11-2003. As per the NO/VA VI the t/ is entitled for compassionate appointment. |3f the deceased had also given in writing to ofthe petitioner No.1 who is the son-in-law l-|im on compassionate ground as there is no fw compassionate appointment. . it appears that before filing this petition, Vne a(T/ notice for demand of justice to the fessing any opinion on the merit of t.he case, [ a detailed representation along with copy of to the respondent No.2 within a period of 15 i^ directed to get the matter examinedtn the 1 petitioners within a period of 2 months from and to"examine as to whether the petrtioner ippointment. If he is fc'jnd to be eligible for fespondent No.2 to process the case ofthe !iw. |the petition stands disposed of, N0.2553C006 and I.A.No.6530/2006 d copy of this order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo JUdge \ ••— - - r—- ^