1 ca 3913.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3913 OF 2011 IN CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP NO. 6642 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 34 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP NO. 6642 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 34 OF 2009 Shamrao S/o Ramchandra Naikwadi and others .. Applicants Versus Venkates S/o Narsinha Acharya and others .. Respondents Shri S. S. Choudhari, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri A. S. Usmanpurkar, Advocate for Respondents. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 17TH JUNE, 2011. PER COURT : . These are the applications for condonation of delay in filing the restoration application and for restoration of the writ 2 ca 3913.11 petition. Shri Usmanpurkar, the learned counsel for respondents vehemently opposes the application on the ground that the conduct of the applicant does not permit any liberal approach to be taken. For more than a year no steps were taken, as such the Court had rightly passed the order. 2. It seems that the steps were not taken as against the respondent No. 3-D. For not taking steps against one of the respondent, the whole petition could not have been dismissed. The learned counsel states that the legal representatives of said respondent No. 3-D are already on record. Taking into consideration the nature of the dispute, the civil applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause “B”. 3. The necessary steps be taken for bringing on record the legal representatives or intimating that legal representatives are already on record. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/June 11