IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION NO : 9487 of 1995 Between: 1. .B.R.Naidu S/o. Muni Swamy Naidu 2. M.Yadaiah S/o. Eshwaraiah 3. Vasudev S/o.B.P.Patrani 4. J.krishna S/o. Narshima 5. R.Narshima S/o.Enkalu 6. K.Lalitha S/o.K.Yellaiah 7. V.Pentaiah, s/o.Balaiah 8. J.Jaipal S/o.Narsimha 9. W.Ushaiah S/o.Sree Ramulu 10. J.Narsimha S/o.Ramaiah 11. B.V.S.Ramesh S/o. Venkata Swamy 12. Ravinder Kumar Agrawal s/o.Vasudev Agarwal 13. B.Venkata Swamy S/o. Pullaiah 14. Pushpa Devi W/o.Prahalad Rai Agarwal 15. Prahalad Rai Agarwal S/o.Chateerbeej 16. Ch.N. Krishna Rao S/o Ch.N.Venkata Narsimha Rao 17. K.Venkataswamy S/o.Ramulu 18. Pasha Bhai S/o. Saleem 19. K.Bala Prasad S/o. Yellaiah 20. K.Krishna s/o.Ramulu 21. K.Sree Ramulu S/o.Pochaiah 22. A.Laxmiaha S/o.A.Pochaiah (All are residents of Shaikpet Village,Golconda Mandal,Hyderabad District). ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Mandal Revenue Officer, Golconda Mandal, Hyderabad. 2 District Collector Hyderabad District 3 Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad rep. by its Commissioner Tankbund Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, declaring that the action of the respondents in interfering with and demolishing the rooms of the petitioners in Sy.No.391, (Road Nos.4 and 5), situated at Shaikpet village, Golconda Mandal, Hyderabad, without any notice and opportunity and without passing any orders is arbitrary and illegal and direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners in respect of the said rooms/ properties, except in accordance with law and grant such other relief as it deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.VENKATRAMANA ( not present) Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for Respondent No.3: MR.GANTA RAMA RAO The Court made the following : ORDER: There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner o n 9-9-2004. Consequently the matter has been posted today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today when the matter is called, neither the petitioner nor his counsel is present and there is no representation on his behalf. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No cost ---------------------- 16-09-2004 Stp Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 Mandal Revenue Officer, Golconda Mandal, Hyderabad. 2 District Collector Hyderabad District 3 Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad rep. by its Commissioner Tankbund Hyderabad 4.2CCs to G.P. for Revenue,A.P.High Court Buildings,(OUT) 2.2CD copies THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION NO : 9487 of 1995 16-09-2004