Criminal Revision No. 519 of 2001 (Old No. 913/1994) Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. None appeared for the revisionist. Learned A.G.A. perused the record. He revisionist was preferred against the summoning order passed under Section 204 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is evident from the record that the High Court has not stayed the proceedings of the criminal case which was filed in the year 1994. Since there was no stay against the proceedings of the criminal case, the same appeared to have been terminated finally according to the law. Considering this, the revision, in fact, has been rendered infructuous and therefore liable to be dismissed. The revision is dismissed. (Irshad Hussain, J.) Dated 23.10.2003 Rawat