1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. LPA No. 368 of 2007 Suresh v. Ground Water and ors Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr Anand Parchure, Advocate for appellant Mr A.M. Deshpande, AGP for respdts Coram: A.P. Deshpande and R.C. Chavan, JJ Dated : 8th January 2008 A judgment and order passed by the learned single Judge is challenged to the extent it denies the relief of continuity of service to the petitioner with effect from 15th March 1989 whereas by the impugned order, the benefit has been extended to the petitioner from 12th December 1990, it being the date on which the complaint was filed before the Labour Court. Perused the impugned order. The same does not call for interference. Letters Patent Appeal is accordingly dismissed. Judge. Judge. hsj