Criminal Misc. No. M-38989 of 2007 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Criminal Misc. No. M-38989 of 2007 Date of Decision: 9.3.2009 Smt. Surjit Kaur and Others …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and Another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Arvind Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Mor, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent No.1-State. Mr. Balwinder Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for quashing of case FIR No. 5 dated 7.2.2000 registered at Police Station Panjokhra, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC. One Sunder Singh was survived by three daughters namely, Surjit Kaur, Sukhdev Kaur and Tejinder Kaur. Sunder Singh executed will dated 24.11.1995 bequeathing his property to his three daughters in equal share. This will was doubted by the complainant and he alleged that thumb impressions on the will were forged. Parties approached the Civil Court. The Civil Court held the will to be genuine and held that all Criminal Misc. No. M-38989 of 2007 2 the three daughters are entitled to estate of Sunder Singh. Newly added respondent No.2 Manpreet Singh, complainant, is son of Tejinder Kaur, third daughter of Sunder Singh. He has submitted an affidavit in this Court, in which it has been stated that the matter has been compromised and under wrong notion he had lodged FIR. Complainant-respondent No.2 has further submitted that he be allowed to withdraw the FIR against the two sisters of his mother, scribe and the attesting witnesses. Mr. Balwinder Singh, Advocate, has caused appearance for respondent No.2 Manpreet Singh. Manpreet Singh, respondent No.2 is also present in the Court. He has been identified by his counsel Mr. Balwinder Singh, Advocate. Kamlesh Singh, Assistant Sub Inspector, from Police Station Panjokhra, is present in the Court to assist Mr. S.S. Mor, learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. He has also identified respondent No.2-Manpreet Singh. Parties are closely related. They have amicably resolved their dispute. A better sense has prevailed upon the complainant-respondent No.2, not to pursue the complaint in view of the decision rendered in civil case. It has been held by Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh v. State of Punjab 2007(3) Recent Criminal Reports 1052 that compromise not only promotes peace in the society but also saves parties from litigation. In view of the law laid down in Kulwinder Singh’s case (supra) and keeping in view the compromise arrived at between the Criminal Misc. No. M-38989 of 2007 3 parties, present petition is accepted and impugned FIR along with all consequential proceedings is quashed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge March 9, 2009 “DK”