IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 159 OF 2010 M/S. SARDESSAI ENGINEERING WORKS THROUGH ITS MANAGING PARTNER SHRI PRAKASH B. SARDESSAI AND ANR. ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA, THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 4 ORS. ... Respondent Mr. V. P. Thali, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. A. Kamat, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- NARESH H. PATIL & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 10th March, 2010 P.C.: Heard. 2. We have perused order passed in proceedings of Writ Petition No.536/2009, by the Division Bench of this Court (Coram : N.A. Britto & R.M. Savant, JJ.). A review petition was filed being Civil Application (Review) No.1/2010 in Writ Petition No.536/2009. The same came to be dismissed by order dated 28/01/2010 (Coram : N.A. Britto & U.D. Salvi, JJ.). 3. We have heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners. In the facts of the case, we find that at this stage no interference is warranted, as admittedly the petitioners have not deposited the sum of Rs.8 lacs as directed by this Court vide order dated 11/12/2009 in Writ Petition No.536/2009. 4. The learned additional Government advocate appearing for the Electricity Department states that in case the petitioners deposit the amount of Rs.8 lacs, within 48 hours, the electricity connection will be reconnected subject to payment of reconnection charges. 5. In this view of the matter, the petition stands dismissed. All issues are kept open for the petitioners to agitate before appropriate statutory forum. NARESH H. PATIL, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH