IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 13TH OCTOBER 2008 / 21ST ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 25529 of 2008(S) -------------------------- OP.1503/2004 of FAMILY COURT,TRIVANDRUM .................... PETITIONER: --------------------- DR.SUNI, AGED 32 YEARS, D/O. SASIDHARA PANICKER, NARAYANA MANDIR, GOWREESAPATTOM, PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695 004. BY ADV. DR.SEBASTIAN CHAMPAPPILLY SMT.ANNIE GEORGE SMT.RINTA GEORGE RESPONDENT: ----------------------- DR.L.B. JAYAPRAKASH, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. DR. D. BAHULEYAN, 'APSARAS' AYIROOPPARA, POTHENCODE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695 584. ADV. SRI.PRAVEEN VYASAN FOR R1 SRI.R.RAJESH (K) FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/10/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.25529/2008 S APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF O.P.NO.1503 OF 2004 FILED BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT AT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DTD. 30/09/2004. EXT.P2: COPY OF WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED IN MARCH 2007 FILED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT FILED UNDER SECTIN 173 OF CR.P.C. DTD. 16/02/2006 IN C.C.NO.28 OF 2006 BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT III, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORT FILED IN EXHIBIT P1 BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT AT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DTD. 14/11/2006. EXT.P5: COPY OF I.A.NO.395 OF 2008 FILED BY THE PETITIONER DTD. 26/02/2008. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT IN I.A.NO.395 OF 2008 DTD. 29/03/2008. EXT.P7: COPY OF ORDER DTD. 30/07/2008 IN I.A.NO.395 OF 2008. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss P.R.Raman & T.R. Ramachandran Nair, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No.25529/2008-S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 13th day of October, 2008. J U D G M E N T Raman, J. The prayer made in this writ petition is to quash Ext.P7 which is an order passed by the Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram in an interlocutory application filed by Dr.Suni, the petitioner herein for directing the parties for a psychiatric counseling. The court below by the impugned order dismissed the application against which the writ petition is filed. 2. During the pendency of the writ petition, we made efforts to find whether the dispute could be amicably settled between the parties and for that matter, we even arranged for counseling by an expert. Accordingly, we appointed Dr.Prakash Chandran Arackal, an expert, for counseling the parties, who pursuant to the directions issued, after examining the parties and primary interaction with them, filed a report which shows that there is hardly any chance for settlement. 3. In the circumstances, we find that the prayer as sought for in the court below has since been worked out by sending the parties for a psychiatric counseling. No further orders are required. The writ petition is, W.P.(C).No.25529/2008-S -:2:- therefore, dismissed. However, the court below may expedite the application pending before it, if moved by either of the parties. (P.R. Raman, Judge.) (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms