m IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR -..,._»-_^ /2oii OhnsionBendl fA {M) N0. T APPELLANT ^{appticoflt] ^ Nitin bixit,, S/o Mohan Praasad Dixit, Vs RESPONbENT [non- applicants] aged31 years, Hs.no.15/1Z31, 1st block, 2nd floor (Sanj Thana Parisar, Railway StationRoad, Raipur (.C.G.). W/o Nitin ,<J <fc^ •^••"c^-" x^ ><?p"'-^<:>' .^•' ^ A •^^ .-y: Smt. Poonam Dixit, Dixit,aged 29 years, 1st add.-C/o Smt.Abha Shatme, Poorva Madhyamik Shaala, Panghi, post-Para9aon, PS-Arang, Dist- i(T 'Raipur(CG) 2"d add.- C/o Shri B.B.Shukla gdvocate, Doulatganj, Mohan Singh's Bada, near Sadabahaar Petha Bhandaar, ffwalior, (MP). Z^Shri Diwakar Shukla, age 36 years, work add-Mukhyd Vidhik Sahayak Samanya Prasashan, Mukhyalaya, P.M.R, Jabalpur,(MP), 2" add-Shri Diwakar Shukla, through HarshRaj Kushwaha, Khendelwal Compound, Vyahvar Bagh, Jabalpur, (MP). Smt.Sucheta Shukla (Vyakhata), 1st add.- C/o .Shri B.B.Shukla advocate, Doulatganj, Mohan Singh's Bada, near Sadabahaar Petha Bhanddar,Gwalior, (MP). Work add.-Jivdji Rao, Higher Secondary School, Jayendra ©anj, Lashkar, 6walior,(MP). 4. .Shri B.B.Shukla advocdte, Doulatgan.j, Mohan Sfngh's Bada, near Sadabahaar Petha Bhandaar, Gwalior, (MP). a PETITION UNDER SECTION 19flYOF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT 1!ih,.i;l:-<^ i^*!^^is^ J^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH: HON'BLE MR. I.M.QUDDUSI & HON'BLE MR. G. MINHAJUDDIN. JJ. F.A.fMINo. M /2011 Apoellant Applicant Respondents Non-applicants (PRNo.1670/11) Nitin Dixit Vs Smt. PoonamDixit and others f-^ . Present: None for the appellant. ORDER (Orall (2nd August, 2011) Perl.M. Quddusi. J; This is a defective appeat as it has been barred by four days, but no applicatlon for condonation of delay along with Memo of Appeal has been filed, and further respondent No.4 has been additionally made a party in this appeal, who was not a party beforethe Court below. List is being revised. Case was ealled out twice. However, none appears for the appellant to remove the aforesaid defects. In these circumstances, we are left with no other option but to dismlss this defective appeat for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want or prosecution, ^ - Sd/- . I G. Minhajuiidin i Judge Sd/- Ab I.M.Quddusi /^ Judge ¥f