IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1086 OF 2006 Sangli Bank Ltd. .. .... Petitioners V/s M/s.Rohit Travels & Ors.. . ..... Respondents. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Office Notes, Office ) Court's or Judge's Orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances ) Court's orders or directions and ) Registrar's orders. ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Mr.N.D.Yelkar, Adv. for the petitioners. None for respondents. CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR AND V.R.KINGAONKAR, JJ. 03.03.2006. PC: By this petition concurrent orders passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal are questioned. The claim of the petitioners- Sangli Bank Ltd. Was decreed in toto. Interest was awarded at the rate of 6% p.a. An Appeal was therefore preferred for enhancement in the rate of interest. That appeal is rejected on the ground that the exercise of discretion by the Tribunal was proper and judicious. 2. This petition impugns these two orders. Grant of interest is matter of discretion. Two Courts have applied their mind and held that the discretion was properly exercised. No jurisdictional error is pointed out. Hence petition dismissed.