1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 485 OF 2004 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 480 OF 2004 Associated Business Company. .. Plaintiffs vs. M/s. Richardson & Crudas (1972) Ltd., .. Defendants. Mr. None for plaintiffs. Mr. H.N. Walawalkar for defendants. CORAM : S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 4TH OCTOBER, 2005. P.C. . In view of the scheme being sanctioned under the AIFR and in implementation, the learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff seeks leave to withdraw the summons for judgment with liberty to take out fresh summons for judgment after the proceedings are completed. The summons for judgment is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 2. The defendants and their advocates are directed to keep the plaintiff as well as the office 2 of this Court informed of the status of the case every six months and in an event if there is any final order passed, the same to be communicated within a period of two weeks from passing of such order. Office to act in pursuance of such order accordingly.