SBCWPNo.758/2009 Om Prakash & Anr vs State of Raj. & Ors. Dtd. 2.2.2009 !! 1 !! S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.758/2009 Om Prakash & Anr. vs State of Raj. & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : - 2.2.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Kishan Bansal,for the petitioners. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The applicant has been impleaded as party in the suit filed by the plaintiff seeking relief of injunction against the defendants on the ground that he was a complainant against the plaintiff. After going through the facts of the case, I do not find that by impleading the applicant as party, the nature of the suit will be changed or scope of inquiry will be enlarged so as to cause embarrassment for the plaintiff and further there appears to be no reason of the plaintiff for grievance. It is true that one cannot be impleaded as party who is informant for wrong act of the plaintiff to the concerned SBCWPNo.758/2009 Om Prakash & Anr vs State of Raj. & Ors. Dtd. 2.2.2009 !! 2 !! authorities, but when the trial court impleaded that person as party-defendant resulting into no consequence of enlarging the scope of the suit or changing the nature of the suit or will create any embarrassment for the plaintiff, this Court would not inclined to interfere in the said order by exercising powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-