Wp1214.98gp 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1214 OF 1998 General Manager, Dr. Writer’s Food Products Ltd. ....Petitioner. Vs. Ashok Shrirang Yadav & Ors. ....Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1215 OF 1998 General Manager, Dr. Writer’s Food Products Ltd. ....Petitioner. Vs. Mahadeo Shivaji Mandhare & Ors. ....Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1216 OF 1998 General Manager, Dr. Writer’s Food Products Ltd. ....Petitioner. Vs. Prakash Anandrao Shinde & Ors. ....Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1284 OF 1998 General Manager, Dr. Writer’s Food Products Ltd. ....Petitioner. Vs. Anna Baburao Mohite & Ors. ....Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1285 OF 1998 General Manager, Dr. Writer’s Food Products Ltd. ....Petitioner. Vs. Puranik Kundlik Kamble & Ors. ....Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1287 OF 1998 Wp1214.98gp 2 General Manager, Dr. Writer’s Food Products Ltd. ....Petitioner. Vs. Bapu Maruti Ubale & Ors. ....Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1289 OF 1998 General Manager, Dr. Writer’s Food Products Ltd. ....Petitioner. Vs. Ramdas Kisan Landge & Ors. ....Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1290 OF 1998 General Manager, Dr. Writer’s Food Products Ltd. ....Petitioner. Vs. Jagannath Asnandrao Shinde & Ors. ....Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1291 OF 1998 General Manager, Dr. Writer’s Food Products Ltd. ....Petitioner. Vs. Anwar Allauddin Mahat & Ors. ....Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1292 OF 1998 General Manager, Dr. Writer’s Food Products Ltd. ....Petitioner. Vs. Hanmantrao Manikrao Gaikwad & Ors. ....Respondents. Ms. Neeta Mehta i/by Mr. K.P. Anilkumar for the Petitioner in all the matters. Mr. Kiran Bapat for Respondent No.1 in WP No. 1289/1998 and WP 1291/1998. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 7th April, 2010 Wp1214.98gp 3 P.C.: 1 The Petitioner and the issues are common and therefore, this common order. 2 The Petitioner has challenged the interlocutory order dated 17/02/1998, passed by the Industrial Court, Kolhapur whereby, the application for stay of the interlocutory order passed by the Labour Court, Satara dated 05/12/1997, whereby, the Labour Court directed the Petitioner to deposit wages of all the complainants due from 13/08/1997 onwards in the Court, in first week of each month. 3 The Petitioner, therefore, filed the present petition by raising the grounds including the fact that the interlocutory orders were passed though the main complaint was not adjudicated or decided and it was pending. This court, also after taking note, by order dated 9th March, 1998, while admitting the Petition passed interim order in terms of prayer clauses (c) and (d), thereby the interlocutory orders passed by the Labour Court and order passed by the Industrial Court, were stayed. However, this Court has permitted/ observed that the main complaint, pending before the Labour Court, Satara to proceed and to be disposed of, as early as possible. The above order is of the year 1998. In my view, the pleadings must have been completed and the main complaint, by this time, must have been disposed of. Even otherwise, no one is appeared for the Respondents, though served. The matters are listed twice on board for disposal/dismissal. There is no Wp1214.98gp 4 point in keeping all these matters pending, in view of above circumstances. 4 All the Petitions are therefore, disposed of as infructuous. However, the liberty is granted to the Petitioner to apply for the appropriate order, in case any instructions, otherwise 5 All the Petitions are accordingly disposed of with liberty. 6 Rule discharged. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)