3 BEFORE THE M.P. STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BENCH RAIPUR O.A. N0. /2002 [^^^^U^Io/o.^ APPLICANT €' "^i NON-APPLICANT 1. Dharmendra Singh Bais S/o Shri Mahendra Singh Bais Asstt. Teacher Boys Hostel, Uttar Chakradharnagar Raigarh 2. Santosh Kumar Pandey SonofShriR.J.Pandey Asstt.Teacher High School, Gharghoda Distt.Raigarh 3. Smt. Ajit Kumari Beg W/o Shri Prakash Beg Asstt.Teacher Pre-Metric Girls Hostel, Raigarh Distt. Raigarh 4. Chintamani Patel SonofShriM.S.Patel Asstt. Teacher MiddleSchool, Renda (Gharghoda) Distt. Raigarh 5. Lalit Kumar Singh S/o Shri Baleshwar Ram Asstt. Teacher High School, Gharghoda Distt. Raigarh 6. M.D. Bansod S/o Manu Dau Bansod Asstt. Teacher BoysHostel, Kanakvira Distt. Raigarh VERSUS ^ 1. StateofChhattisgarh through the Secretary Department ofAdim Jati Kalyan Adivasi Vikas D.K.S. Bhavan Raipur(C.G-) //2// 2. The Commissioner Adivasi Vikas Vibhag Govt-ofChhattisgarh D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur Chhattisgarh ORIGINALAPPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OFTHE M.P. STATE ADMINISTRATIVETRIBUNALACT, 1985 -^ 'UQ SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SAT15H K. AGNIHQTRI. J. Petitioner WRIT PETITION (S.l N0^850 OF 2005 Arun Shukla Resoondents State of Madhya Pradesh (now ChhatUsgarh) and others Petitioner WRIT PETITJON (S.l N0^883 OF 2006 VishnuRam Sahu Respondents StatB of Madhya Pndesh (now Chhattisgarh) and othere Petttioners WRIT PETmON (S.l NOA984 OF 2005 Ram Kumar Chohan and ethere versus Respondents : State of ChhatGsgarh and another Petitioners Resoondents WRIT PETITION (S.l N0^808 OF 2005 Tosh Lal Patel and others State of ChhatUsgarh and another ii\j Petitioners WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.4907 OF 20(15 Subhash ChandraGupla and othere versus Responclents : Stato of Chhattisgarh and another Petjtionere WRIT PETmON (S.) N0.4908 OF 2006 Titosh Kumar Oavel and others versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others Petitionere Resoondents WRTT PETITION (S.) N0^909 OF 2006 Ganesh Ram Patel and cytheFs Stat®of Chhattisgarh and anothw Petitionere WRIT PETn-ION (S.l NO^tlO OF 20W Dharmendra Slngh Bais and othere versus Respondente : SlateofChhaUtegarhandanother PeBtionere Rwpondents WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.4811 OP 2005 Mahesh Ram Patrt and ancther State of ChhatBsgarh and andther ty Petittonere WRIT PETmON (S.IN0^912 OF 2005 Bairagi Prasad Gupta and otheis vereus Responctonts : State of ChhatUsgarh and ottrre >• '• P®tition®TS Respondents WRTT PETITION (S.l N04813 OF 2006 Banshi Dhar Patel and otheis State of ChhatHsgarh and analher WRtT PETITION (S.) N0.6083 OF 2006 Petitionere : Nand Kishore Vafehnav and ottiers Vereus Raspondents State of ChhatBtgarb and ethera •^ WRIT PETmON (8.1 N0.6064 OF 2005 Petitionere : Madhav Murari Nayak and othera vereus Respondente : State of Chhattegarh and another Petitfoners WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.6088 OF 2006 Sant Ram Sao and other» versus Respondente : State of Chhaffisgarh •nd otheis Petitioner WRIT PETmONtS.l N0.6070 OF 2005 versus Smt. Uijawala Saxena State ofChhattisgarh and othere Present : Mr. Maneesh Sharma. counsel for the peUtionere. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on 22nd Day of January, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing fer the parties Jointly submit that the facts and question of law inwhfed in the preserrt bateh of writ petitions are squardy covered by the dectsion of thi»Court in the case of Sushll T/werf emd ottiws vs. Stote Govwnmenf of C^lMrfffsgaffr ancf othws (Writ Petttion (S.) No.5976 of 2006). dated 7-11-2006. 2. For the aforementioned reasens, the writ petittons are allowed in terms of the decision of this Court In the matter of SusMI Tlwaii and othws vs. Stata Govemmwrt of Chlisttlsgarti wnl ottwrs (Supra). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be ptaced on th®record of ttie connected writ petiUons. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Jydge Gopal