IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD. WEDNESDAY THE TWENTYTHIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY WRIT APPEAL NO. 1 1 1 9 OF 2009 Between M.Mehar Krishna, s/o. late Surya Chandra Rao Aged about 28 years, 0ccupation: Private Employee, R/o. Kaikalur village and Mandal, Krishna District & Anr. … Appellants-Petitioners V/s. The Superintendent of Police, Machilipatnam, Krishna district & Anr. … Respondents-Respondents Counsel for the appellants : Sri K. Venkatesh Counsel for the respondents : GOVT.PLEADER FOR HOME THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY WRIT APPEAL NO. 1 1 1 9 OF 2009 J U D G M E N T : (Per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meenakumari) Aggrieved of the order dated 02-6-2009 passed in WP.No.24324 of 2008 by the learned single Judge of this Court whereby the learned single Judge dismissed the writ petition by placing on record the specific averment of respondent No.2 that except investigating into the case, he is not interfering with the life and personal liberty of the petitioners, the present writ appeal is filed. 2. The main writ petition was filed seeking mandamus to declare the action of the second respondent in harassing the petitioners in connection with F.I.R. in Cr.No. 100/2008, dated 16-10-2008 as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to quash the F.I.R. in Cr.No.100/2008, dated 16- 10-2008 on the file of second respondent. 3. When the matter came up today, Sri M.Venkatesh, the learned counsel for the appellants seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ appeal with a leave to avail such remedies as may be available to the appellants in law. Leave is accordingly granted. 4. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. It is needless to observe that if the appellants avail any such remedy, the same shall be considered on its own merits uninfluenced by the dismissal of this writ appeal. No costs. _____________________ JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI __________________________ JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY 23-09-2009. I s L THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY WRIT APPEAL No. 1 1 1 9 OF 2009 (Judgment of the Division Bench delivered by the Hon’ble Smt.Justice T.Meenakumari) Computer No. 43 I s L Date: 23-09-2009