- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1769 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.1639 of 2005 ... L’oreal India Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. ...Plaintiffs v/s. Henkel Marketing India Ltd. and Anr. ...Defendants ... Mr.V.V.Tulzapurkar with Mr.Amit Jamsandekar i/b M/s.D.H.Law Associates for the Plaintiffs. Mr.Iqbal Chagla i/b M/s.Crawford Bayley & Co. for Defendant No.1. Mr.Ravi Kadam i/b M/s.Crawford Bayley & Co. for Defendant No.2. - 2 - ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 16TH AUGUST,2005 P.C.: . At this stage, a request is made by the learned counsel appearing for Plaintiffs for stay of the operation of this order. The result of granting the prayer would that the ad-interim order would continue to operate. In view of what is observed in the judgment that the Plaintiffs were not justified in moving the Court for ad-interim order without issuing notice to the Defendants, in my opinion, it will not be appropriate to grant stay. The request is rejected. . Certified copy expedited. ... ...