IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 4796 of 2008. Decided on 14.06.2011. Gian Parkash Avasthi. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh. …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the respondent. : Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has made a statutory appeal against the order of imposition of penalty Annexure A-1 on 10th November, 1997 vide Annexure A-4. However, the same has not been decided till date. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the appellate authority to decide the appeal preferred by the petitioner against Annexure A-1 on 10th November, 1997 (Annexure A-4) after taking into consideration all the grounds/pleas taken in the memorandum of appeal, within a period of ten weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. The petitioner shall be heard in person by the appellate authority. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge June 14, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - - 3 -