IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 13TH JUNE 2011 / 23RD JYAISHTA 1933 RP.No. 420 of 2011() IN W.P.(C)NO.26289/2004 -------------------- REVIEW PETITIONER: -------------------------- K.KRISHNAMMA, W/O.MOHANAN ACHARI, AGED 50 YEARS, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT, SALIHA MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL, KUREEPUZHA, REPSENTLY, R/A.WEST POLICE QUARTERS, NO.D2,KAIKULANGARA NORTH THIRUMULAVARAM POST, KOLLAM-12 BY ADV. SMT.REKHA VASUDEVAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION KOLLAM 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER,KOLLAM 4. THE MANAGER, SALIHA MOMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL, KUREEPUZHA,KOLLAM' 5. K.BHUVANESWARY AMMA, HEADMISTRESS S.M.H.S.,KUREEPUZHA 6. NALAKATH SOOPI, EX-HONOURABLE MINISTER OF EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ADV. MR. ANTONY MUKKATH - GOVT. PLEADER. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------------- Review Petition No.420 of 2011 in W.P.(C) No.26289 of 2004 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of June, 2011 ORDER I closed this writ petition on the ground that since the petitioner has filed a subsequent writ petition, she can raise all her contentions in that writ petition. But, on hearing the Writ Petition No.18254/2008, it came out that the petitioner's contentions in that writ petition would be considerably weakened, if this writ petition also is not prosecuted. In the above circumstances, I allow the review petition and restore the writ petition to file. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd