IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1626 of 2006 (M/S) R.K.Mansal ..…… Petitioner Versus District Judge, Pauri Garhwal and others …….. Respondents ………. Mr. B.D. Pande, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B. D. Upadhyaya, Advocate for respondents 2 to 5. Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C. J. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the impugned order dated 15th July, 2006 is set aside. The revision petition dismissed in default is restored to its original position. The parties are directed to appear before the learned District Judge, Pauri Garhwal on 11.02.2009. Since the matter is very old, I direct the learned District Judge, Pauri Garhwal to take all possible steps for very very expeditious disposal of the revision petition and in any event before 30.04.2009. The writ petition stands finally disposed of. (V. K. Gupta, C. J.) 02.01.2009 A