IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34320 of 2008 RAM BABU SAO @ RAMJEE SAO @ RAM BABU Versus STATE OF BIHAR - - - - 2. 14.8.2008 Heard. The Court is not inclined to direct release of the petitioner whose prayer was dismissed by annexure 1. However, the rejection order indicates that the charges were framed on 11.6.2008 against the petitioner who is in custody since 11.11.2006, i.e., the petitioner has already spent about one and a half years in prison without any evidence. I could direct the Fast Track Court No. IInd, Gaya, to conclude Sessions Trial No. 96 of 2007 in one year’s time from the date of production/receipt of a copy of the present order. For expeditious disposal of the case, the court below has to adopt the procedure directed by the Apex Court in the case of Shailendra Kumar Vs. State of Bihar: A.I.R. 2002 S.C. 270. If the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period, the petitioner will have the liberty to renew the prayer 2 before the court below. With the above observation, this petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)