IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13432 of 2010 KUNTO YADAV @ KUNTI YADAV, SON OF LATE BANBARI YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted that on account of some land dispute between the parties, the petitioner is said to have fired at the husband of the Informant. However, considering that the petitioner is in custody since 29.10.2009 and from the report of the Superintendent of Police, Banka, it appears that the petitioner is an accused in only one other case. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. – V, Banka, in Sessions Trial No. 1197 of 2009 arising out of Banka P.S. Case No. 517 of 2008 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the wife of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor 2 shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)