HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BiLASPUR PETITIONER W.P (227 ) N0.7351 of 2009 Dubey Travels, Through Bhavesh Dubey, Heera Archade Pandri, New Bus Stand, Raipur RESPONDENTS Versi/s 1 M/s. Payal Travels, Through the Managing Partner Shri Swaroop Chand Jain, G.E. Road, Durg 2 Regional Transport Authority, Jagdalpur, Djstrict Bastar 3 Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Jagdalpur, District Bastar 4 State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Mahanadi Khand Ghadi Chowk, Raipur WRiT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri Shailendra Bajpai, Counsel forthe petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents No.2 &3. ORALORDER (04.01.2010) SUNILKUMARSINHA.J. Heard. The petitioner, who is respondent No.3 before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal (STAT), Chhattisgarh (Raipur) in Revision Petition No.111/09, has filed this petition challenging the validity of the order dated 07.10.2009, whereby, an application for condonation of delay in filing the revision has been altowed by the Tribunal and the matter has been directed to be fixed for final hearing. W.P (227) N0.7351 of 2009 shyna Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that the Tribunal has allowed the application without assigning sufficient reasons for the same. It appears from the records of the writ petition that the impugned order againstwhich the revision was flled before the STAT was passed on 29.03.2007 and the revision against the said order was filed on 17.08.2009. The respondent No.1 has taken the ground that the respondent was havlng no knowledge about passing of such an order and as soon as it came into their knowledge, an application was filed for obtalning the certified copy ofthe same and aftergetting the certified copy on 20.07.2009, the revision was filed on 17.08.2009. It appears that the Tribunal has allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the revision with a view to give complete justice to the parties by passing order on merits. 1 do not find any reason to interfere with the said order passed bytheTribunai. The petition has no merit. The same is liabie to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. ^, ___ - S»nilK»»"sinba Judge