IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) No. 15164 of 2008. Decided on: 9.11.2010 Mani Ram …. Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others ….. Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr.Justice V.K.Ahuja, Judge For the petitioner: Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.(Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “a) That the respondents may very kindly be directed to decide the representations of the applicant pending with them & to intimate the applicant within a stipulated period whatever this Hon’ble may deem fit and proper with a further prayer to count the period of 4 years & 0 months 2 days which the applicant has rendered in the bank and which is required to be counted for the purpose of pension only, while counting the period of service which the applicant will work with the respondent department. b) That the respondent may also be directed to show unto this Hon’ble Court that why the applicant has been subjected to invidious discrimination while deciding the cases of other similarly situated persons, ignoring the rightful and genuine claim of the applicant, who is fully qualified and eligible in all respects to be appointed against the post of lecturer.” 2 2. It is submitted that no action has been taken on Annexure A-1, representation, and Annexure A- 3, lawyer’s notice. There will be a direction to the first respondent to look into the matter with a notice to the petitioner and take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment by the petitioner alongwith copy of the writ petition. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Dasti copy. ( Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. November 9, 2010 (Justice V.K.Ahuja) (tilak/vt) Judge