WPMS 1291/2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Ms. Menka Tripathi, the learned counsel for the petitioner. One of the contentions raised by the petitioner is that respondent no. 2 issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) on 25th June, 2011 on their website inviting applications indicating that the last date for submission of the bids is 28th June, 2011 and the technical bids would be opened on 29th June, 2011. The Procurement Rules indicate that there should be minimum three weeks’ time for submission of the proposal, if any. In the light of the aforesaid, the Court finds that sufficient time was not given by respondent no. 2 for submission of the proposal by various parties. Sri Rakesh Thapliyal, the learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2 has conceded that sufficient time was not given and that he has spoken to the Managing Director, who has agreed to extend the date as per the Procurement Rules and that a corrigendum to that effect would be issued on the website within 24 hours. In view of the aforesaid, without going into any other allegations raised in the writ petition, this petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) 29-06-2011 SP