IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.120 OF 2007 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.920 OF 2005 IN L.C.SUIT NO.1043 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.177 OF 2007 Dr.Namdeo Arjun Raut ...Appellant Versus The Municipal Corporation for Gr.Bombay & Anr. ...Respondents WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.121 OF 2007 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.919 OF 2005 IN L.C.SUIT NO.1042 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.178 OF 2007 Mr.Robert Fernandes ...Appellant Versus The Municipal Corporation for Gr.Bombay & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Suresh K.Mali for Appellants. None for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. : 2 : FEBRUARY 20, 2007. FEBRUARY 20, 2007. FEBRUARY 20, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the Appellants. There is no reason to interfere in these Appeals, as the Trial Court has rightly observed that there is statutory remedy available to the Appellants, which has not been availed. Besides, no notice under Section 527 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act has been issued, for which the Suit itself may not be maintainable. 2. For the reasons recorded by the Trial Court with which I am in agreement, no interference is warranted. Dismissed. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.