IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION {S} NO. L’Xz/y /2008 PETITIONER )1». Girish Pandey, S/o.Late Shri Ramkrishna Pandey, Aged about 6O years, (Orthopedist) CIMS, Bilaspur, R/o. Rajendra Nagar, Bi'laspur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, V Through the Secretary, Health 81; Family Welfare Department, y D.K.S. Bhawan, Mahtralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Dean, Chhattisgarh Institute of Medical Science, (CIMS) Bilasur (C.G.) ,3. General Secretary, Guru Ghasidas University, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . 2% HIGH COURT QF CHHATTlSGARi-i : BILASPUR WRIT PETITIQN (S)NO.42291’2G98 Qwea (Writ Petition wider Articie 226 of the Constitution of tndia) Sinqie Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Aqnihotri‘ J. Present :- Shri A. K. Shukia, counsei for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the State. GRAL ORDER (Pa5sed on this 07f“ day of Decemher, 2063) With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the petition is heard finaiiy. (2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to deputation allowance as per circular dated 07-01-2004 (Annexure P16) and non-practicing allowance as per (circular dated 20-06-2008 (Annexure P/7). The petitioner has made several representation (Annexure PM to PM) to the respondent authority for grant of deputation and non-practicing allowance but till date no decision has been taken. The petitioner has made last representation to the respondent authority on 25-04-2008 (Annexure P15). (3) Learned State counsel submits that the pending representation of the petitioner before the respondent authority shaii be considered and decided in accordance with law and circuiars as earty as possible preferably within a period of tour weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (4) tn View of the foregoing, according to {earned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing remains for adjudication at this stage. (5) For the reasons mentioned hereinabove,‘the writ petitton stands disposed of. ,‘ i Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ‘ Tumane Sd/- PETITIONER 3r. Gmsh Pandey‘ Versus RE$PONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and others