^ *3 ...-:'1 -^^^- <^'?-;-;^fr'-"" ....-• .*•**» r^V**' ^-**° ^o-' '^•'^ ..-•""t.Cf-'-f'" ••^^^"ak}-"' A- A*eu IN^HE HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE OF CHHAmSGARH ATBILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.3^6^/2006 ^E;S^,SW^ ^ >INIiU r.£^"l'. Ut-ii^u-^ PETITK)N£R: «^ Shankar lal Katoliya S/o- Shri 3ethuram Katholiya Aged about 48 years, R/o- Village- Bharkura, Post:- Kalluban Block:- Chhuriya, Distt- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VEIUiUS RESPONDENTS (1) State of Chhattisgarh Through:- Secretary Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) tf-'' 1, ^<^^°> * . A^».' - &S (2) District Education Officer, Education „ Office Rajandgaon Collectorate, District Rajnandgoan (C.G,) (3) Block Education Officer, Block Chhuriya, ^ Block Education Office, Chhuriya Distrirt Rajnandgaon (C.G.) (4) Indra Prasad Chandravanshi, Assistant ^Teacher Primary School - Sonpuri, District Karwadha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) PETXTION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA XI-HC-78 (TTHCTT ^HTCS 3:5ET '^WWit, ^rn'M'Ko, Rfrtl^y rig,..^.f..^.^Li.4r/6AW3; 200 3TI^?T IR^ (l^3a^Er) sn^rqirRFiN; traTsn^rspitEiT STaiWflfN'sn^r •sbl'ilfd^l-i Hl*<MT^'teI^I'<Riwi< ^?3rf^T3n^r -dr wHereas, Heard Shri Anup Mazumdar^. Miss C>eepali Pandey, P,L. f( By the instcnt petition Transfsr orders doted 31.10.; petitioner has been tronsferrecj Bharkura, Block Chhuriya, Distj-. Sonpuri, Biock Kawardha, Distf.[ petitioner is that his transfsr or^er •the request of the petitioner, the petitioner. Second grievance T+ie petitioner is district transferred to another district. Counsei for the oetition^r 31.10.2005 wos never communicah'ed the circumstances, the petitioner) representction to respondent N^ directed to decide the reprsse) which iearned counsel for the Sta-j Havmg heard iearned coun^e! to the facts csnd circumstancesl counsel for the petitioner caare \, Adv. for tiie petitioner. the 5tate on advsince copy. the petitioner has chalienged the ^005 & 22.6.2006, whereby the from ©overnment Primar-y Schooi, -f. Rajnandgoon to Primary School, Kabirdham. The grievance of the has been shown to be oassed on i, no such request was made by of the petitjoner is that the post of post, whereas, he has bsen appeprs submits that even order doted to the petitioner, therefore, in may be cilowed to mcke a detaiied i.1 and in turn, respondent No.l be itation in accordance wlth faw, to e has no objection. |e! for tiie parties and having r'egard of the case, the prayer made by to be just; fcir A reasonable, P.T.O. f2>9 XI-HC-78 3^'^raicra', »T{)<I'IS, Rdi'My *n»i?ir**)i<t) ^ 200 an^r^a* ('i?!^6"^') sn^T^Tf^ira; asn'sTi^rshHiti .f.} ^t^B^y, WaTWWfeTST^W 2^, therefore, without expressing an^ petitioner is ailowed to make a of •riiis petition raising GJI his dcsys froffl todoy and 'in turn representation of the petitioner qipropriate orders within a receipt of representatjon. If Then hs should not be rslieved tiii Wi1+i the direction aforesaiifl Consequentiy, M.(W.)P. No.^ Certified copy as per ruies. delt-oiled gnetyances ^ opinion on the merits of case. the representation along witii copy to respondent No.l within 10 respondent No.l to decide the fn accordance with the law and pass of 30 days from tiie date of petitionsr is not already relieved. yhe representation is decided. I, the petition stands disposed of. ^646 /06 also stand disposed of. ttll<ltfl<fl-l K11(lTiftetA<f»ltril< ^STf^tTSn^T Sd/- L.C-Bhadoo Judge P.T.O. ^