IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 94 OF 2005 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 94 OF 2005 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 94 OF 2005 IN IN IN APPEAL NO. 212 OF 1998 APPEAL NO. 212 OF 1998 APPEAL NO. 212 OF 1998 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1708 OF 1995 WRIT PETITION NO. 1708 OF 1995 WRIT PETITION NO. 1708 OF 1995 Laxminarain U. Trivedi & Anr. .....PETITIONERS. VS. The Municipal Corporation of .....RESPONDENTS Greater Bombay & Others. Mr. H. Chaturvedi for the Petitioner. Mr. S.K. Talsania i/b. Crawford Bayley & Co. for the Respondent. CORAM : S.K.SHAH, J. CORAM : S.K.SHAH, J. CORAM : S.K.SHAH, J. DATE : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2006 DATE : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2006 DATE : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2006 P.C. 1. The order of payment of back wages is passed by the Labour Court. 2. The question of contempt does not arise. The Petitioner may take recourse of execution of order. 3. The Contempt Petitioner is disposed of accordingly. [S.K. SHAH,J.]