THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8114 of 2011 ORDER: In this writ petition, petitioners, which are public limited companies registered under the Companies Act, 1956, seek a mandamus declaring the action of the police in not registering the crime on the complaint lodged by them against the persons, who are causing obstructions for the tower erected by them for the purpose of their telecommunication business in premises bearing No.5-7-44/1, Sangeetha Nagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, as illegal and arbitrary. It is the case of the petitioners that they obtained premises bearing No.5-7-44/1 at Sangeetha Nagar, Kukatpally, on lease and erected the tower by obtaining license from Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation. It is their grievance that when their workers are attending to regular maintenance works of such tower, there is interference by the neighbours, and in spite of lodging a complaint, no action has been taken by the police. Based on the written instructions, it is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents that the petitioners have not submitted any complaint in person but complaint, dated 17.12.2010, sent by registered post was received on 27.12.2010. It is further submitted that on receipt of the said complaint, the Sub-Inspector of Police, Kukatpally Police Station, who is in-charge of the Sector of Sangeetha Nagar, had made enquiries thereon. It is further submitted that as per the enquiries conducted, the petitioner companies have erected and installed telecommunication equipment on the land as well as the rooftop of the building in question, by entering into the lease deed with the owner of the building. It is also submitted that keeping in view the safety and healthy environment, the residents of Sangeetha Nagar have approached the petitioners and requested to run their towers duly taking minimum precautionary measures to avoid radiation on the children and the old aged persons but none of the colony people obstructed or interfered with the functioning of the tower erected by the petitioner companies. I have perused a copy of the complaint. The complaint is vague and except saying that some neighbours have interfered with the maintenance works, when the petitioner companies erected the tower, no date was mentioned therein. It is to be noticed that on receipt of the complaint of the petitioner companies on 27.12.2010, the police already conducted enquiry, as such, no direction can be issued as prayed for. However, it is made clear that if there is any further interference, the petitioners to approach the first respondent in person or by way of representation by giving details of such interference. Thereupon, I am sure, the first respondent will take appropriate steps. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 6th APRIL, 2011. kvni