g^«,i<^5£&a.--. .,;."'^'^. 14 I^'^'-^'SSI^ 1 y / ft&y' ^M-i-^-' 4^' ^r W THE HlOHjCQUKr OF CHHA'ITISGAEH : B1LASPU R Writ Petition No. 1549 of 2001 Petitioner Respondents Versus 1. 2. 3. 4. Uhannu Lal Soiu, aged about 56 vears son of late Shri Maoi Lal Soni, cultivator, resident of viila^ge Pandhi, RH.S. Aarang, TahsU Aarang/ District Raipur, P.0. Paragaon (Aarang) Chhattisgaih) Raaiji Soiu, aged about 65 yeais, son of late Shri Axigad Lal Soni, occupation - Nii R/o Behind Rain Mandir - Mahasamund Tah & Distt, Mahasamund, P.0. Mahasamund (C.G.) Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Mahasamund, P.S.H. Tah. & Distt. & P.0. Mahasaoiund (C.G.) Additional Comniissioner (Revenue), Raipiir Division, Coimnissioner Ofiice, Raipur, P.S.H. Tali. P.0. & Distt. Raipur (C.G.) State of Chattisgarh, Through Revenue Secretaxy, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Tah. P.0. and District Raipur (C.G.) 4. (Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) (SB: Hon'ble Sbri Satish K. Agmhotri J.) Shri Soinnath Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shii Vaibhav A. Goverdhan, Advocate for the respodnent No. 1, Shri Rajendra Agan,val, Panel Law}rer for the respoxidents No, 3 to 1. 2. 3. Thakur QRDER (Passed on tbis 21st Day of October, 2008) Learned counsel appearmg for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner seeks permission of tfais Court to withdraw tlus petition, with liberty to file a fresh petiton, it so advised, i£grievance survives. Learned counsel appeadng for the respondents have no objection. !n view ot tlie above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as having becoiae iafructuous. —— —— — - Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge