: 1 : SD IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4399 OF 2003 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4399 OF 2003 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4399 OF 2003 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO.81 OF 1999 FIRST APPEAL NO.81 OF 1999 FIRST APPEAL NO.81 OF 1999 Anusaya Dnyandeo Raje ...Applicant V/s. The Mumbai Municipal Corporation for . Greater Bombay & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.B.K. Raje, Advocate, for the Applicant. Ms.S.A. Musle, Advocate, i/b. V.J. Hegde, for Respondent No.2. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATE : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2008. DATE : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2008. DATE : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The Advocate for the 2nd respondent states that an undertaking of the 2nd respondent dated 31st January, 2008 has been placed on record on 5th February, 2008. The said undertaking appears to be in terms of order dated 9th March, 2007 read with order dated 15th January, 2008. 2. The undertaking is accepted. In view of the undertaking, it is not necessary to grant prayer clause (a) as of today. Hence Application is disposed of. : 2 : 3. In case the 2nd respondent commits any breach of the said undertaking, it will be open for the applicant to file a fresh application praying for interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a). [ABHAY S. OKA, J.] [ABHAY S. OKA, J.] [ABHAY S. OKA, J.]