{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.675 OF 2010 1. Suryabhan s/o Shankar Alane Age-43 years, occ-Business 2. Shankar Suryabhan Alane Age-19 years, Occ-Student Both R/o Tembhurni, Tq-Basmat Dist-Hingoli APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra Through police station Hatta, Tq-Basmat, Dist-Hongoli RESPONDENT ....... Mr.A.B.Dhongade, Advocate for applicants Mrs.Y.M.Kshirsagar, APP for respondent State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 26 th February 2010 PER COURT: 1. This is an application by which the applicants have prayed to release them on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in connection with CR No.14/2010, registered with Hatta Police Station, Dist-Hingoli. {2} 2. Heard learned counsel for applicant followed by learned APP. Perused the papers of investigation. Also perused the papers of investigation carried out in CR No.13/2010, which is lodged by present applicant No.1 against complainant in CR No. 14/2010. 3. Perusal of papers of investigation discloses that in the night of 24.01.2010 at about 8.30 to 9.00 p.m. applicants had been to the DP to put the fuse. It appears that thereafter there was dispute between the complainant and applicants as the applicants are assaulted and abused by the complainant in the name of their caste. Accordingly, an offence came to be registered at CR No. 13/2010 in Hatta police station at 10.45 a.m. by the present applicant No.1, against the present complainant. It appears that the present offence is registered by Balaji against the present applicants alleging that taking benefit of darkness they have snatched gold ornaments of two ladies, named in the complaint. It has to be noted that the allegations in the complaint at CR No. 14/2010 are that the said ladies had been to the field to answer the nature’s call. It requires to consider that the DP is situated near one Mahadeo temple in the close vicinity of the village and there is remote possibility that anybody can go in the said area to answer the nature’s call. Apart from this, the complaint, of the same incident, occurred at 8.30 p.m. on 24.01.2010 has been registered after about 8 hours, after the applicant No.1 has lodged the {3} complaint at CR No.13/2010. It appears that the present complaint at CR No.14/2010 is lodged only to give counter blast to the complaint at CR No.13/2010. In the premise, as urged, possibility of false implication of the applicants cannot be ruled out. Hence, the application deserves to be allowed. 4. In the result, the application is allowed. Both the applicants be released on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with CR No.14/2010, registered with Hatta Police Station, Dist-Hingoli on their furnishing surety in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- each and on executing PR bonds in the like amount. Applicants are directed to cooperate with the investigating agency. Parties to act on authenticated copy of this order. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln675-10