CWP No. 9015 of 2006 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No. 3559 of 2009 in CWP No. 9015 of 2006 Date of Decision: April 16, 2009 Asha Chaqudhary ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. B.K.Bagri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Harish Rathee, Senior DAG, Haryana. Mr.G.K.Khanna, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. CM No. 3559 of 2009 CM allowed. Documents taken on record. CWP No. 9015 of 2006 This petition was filed claiming the benefit of previous service for the purpose of computation of retiral benefits. By CM No. 3559 of 2008 the petitioner has placed on record recommendations made by the respondent No.2 whereby it has been resolved that the amendment CWP No. 9015 of 2006 2 proposed by the University favouring persons like the petitioner should be approved. Learned counsel for the parties are agreed that this petition be disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.1 to take an appropriate decision on the said recommendation within any reasonable time. I find this request to be fair and just. In the circumstances this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider the proposal sent by respondent No.2 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE April 16, 2009 sunita