IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13632 of 2011 BHUNESHWAR YADAV S/O PUNNA YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 29.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under rules 4, 40 and 52 of the Bihar Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1972 Sections 21 (A), 37(I) Air Act, 1981 and Sections 31 and 42 of Water Act and Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner is that the petitioner and others operated the brick-kiln without obtaining no objection from the Pollution Department and has caused loss of Rs. 52,000/- to the Pollution Department. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner never operated the brick-kiln and the accusation does not constitute any criminal offence. Let the petitioner deposit Rs. 2 25,000/- before the learned court below which will be invested in some Fixed Deposit Scheme which will be subject to final result of the case. On deposit of the aforesaid amount, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 352 of 2010, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Indian Penal Code. Safik (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)