IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 8401 of 2008. Decided on: 07.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Raj Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Mr. Lalit K. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening events. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. However, the respondents are directed to pay and release the due and admissible salary to the petitioner for the vacation period in view of the principles laid down by this Court in CWP No.415 of 2000, titled Baldev Singh and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others and 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - connected matters, decided on 1.9.2008, within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of the judgment. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 07, 2010. (sck).