!N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA/IVI‘ISGgRl-I z BILA§EQI§ _\;yrit Petition No. 1206 of 2005 WRI’ ‘ PETITION UNDER AR’I‘ltLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ‘NDIA ' (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihoui J.) SIL Anand Kumur T‘W'an Advon°£ for the peuuoner 51111 Alok Baksm, Govt. Advocate tor the respondents No. 1, 3, 4 & 5. Shri Sanjay Patel. Advocate for the respondent No. 2. VJ (Passed on this 20th day of October, 2008) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that consequent to the award the petitioner] society is entitled to allotment of 11 plots on admissible payment. 2. Leained counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 submits that the Chhattisgarh Gn‘h Nirman Mandal shall take steps and pass appropriate orders, allottin‘g plots, in accordance with law, within a period Of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. P€titioner biddharth Crrih Nirman 5amiti ‘ S'umtl Mammht Rsglstra 0n No 8b wrougn Plesnicm N T Mashram D Tatrors Navar Ralpur (C G} Versus Respondents l. bum of Uhhaitisgarh Through uvcr‘stary Deparungzv of Co bocmtles D K S Bnawan Ralpur (L (x) 2. Chhemsgarh Gr'h NmaJ Mandal, lmougu me Commissioner, Shankar Naomi" Pagaur CG.) 3. Collector Rd1pur (CG-J 4 Land Acquisition Ofricer, Raipt r (C C ) ‘ 5. Chiet bxecutlve bngmeer, (,hhattlsgarh Adhosmrachena V.kash N1gam Ralpur (b G) 6. The Municipal (‘m‘pomtmm Ralpur Through Cmef Mumuyai Umcu, Munlolpal Lomoratlon, Ralpur, Dlstnct Rmpur C, (x) ? (9 ;"L / In vicw of the aove acording to learned counse1 appealing b, c for the petitioner, nothing survives in his etition for t p adjudicaton. i In View of the foregoing this etition tands dispoed of. No p s s order asto costs. Sd/— Satish Agnihotri K. Judge