IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7071 of 2010 MANOJ YADAV, SON OF DEOCHAND YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-TARAR TOLE IMAMGANJ, P.S. DAUDNAGAR, DISTRICT-AURANGABAD. …..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur (Adv.) For the State : APP. ----------- 03/ 07.07.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State. Called for a report regarding stage of the trial has been received. Submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner on previous occasion i.e. on 07.04.2010 was that despite the fact that all the accused persons were present before the court of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad the case was not committed as yet. From the report, it appears that after order of this Court cognizance was taken on 03.05.2010 and on 05.05.2010 copy of police paper was supplied to the accused and the case was committed to the court of Sessions. But the report reveals that several notices were issued against the informant, but she did not appear in the court. The lawyer representing the informant also did not appear in the court. The court has tried its best to 2 inform the lawyer and her for hearing before cognizance but it has not given any result. On merit it has been submitted that though the prayer for bail was rejected earlier but the fact is that the police has found it to be a case under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code and the petitioner is in custody since 17.09.2008. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released from custody on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate/concerned court, Aurangabad in connection with Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 130 of 2008. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)