FFB ^ 81 's~?S~~) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^ (CHHATTISGARH) WRITPETITION (S) N0. P " ' /2011. PETITIONER: Respondents .rits^ ^wy A@Y '.-fs'V "Af: ^ / ^ ^ Shridhar MaU, son of Pahtiya Mali, aged about 57 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Panchpara, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhatdsgarh. versus 1. State of Chhatdsgarh, Through The Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. District Education Ofiicer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERfS): As mentioned in the Cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENT(S): As mentioned in the Cause title. 3. PARTICULARS OF THE CAUSE/ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE PETITION IS MADE. SUBJECT MATTER IN BMEF. E^SE®?i ^^^ i. !i!^p-^^i % ^ ^ HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUI WR!T PETITION (S^ N0.1707 OF 2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Shridhar iViaii Versus State of Chhattisgarh & others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Singte Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri C.Jayant K. Rao; Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Dy. Advocate General forthe State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 30th day of March, 2011) 1. Heard ieamed counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage, and prays for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to make a representation in the light of the circular dated 5.1.2011 (Annexure P/2). 3. Learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State/respondents submits that if a representation is made, the same sha!! be considered and decided within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, in the light of the above stated circuiar. 4. !n view of foregoing, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above-stated liberty. !t is expected that the concerned authorities would consider and decide the representation, if any, as above, wlthin a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the reoresentation alona with a copv of this order. ashok