WP(C) 2265/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B. K. SHARMA Heard Mr. J. Abedin, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. M . Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel, BTC. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has claimed that he is en titled to get appointment as Radiographer consequent upon his selection for the post. Altogether, 4 (four) posts were advertised and according to the petitioner , he having occupied merit position at Sl. No.4 and the respondents having appoi nted all the candidates at Sl. No.1 to 3, he is also entitled to get appointment . The respondents have filed their counter affidavit and Mrs. M. Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel, BTC, has also produced the records before me. It is t he stand of the respondents that due to inadvertence, the number of posts was me ntioned as 4 (four), although in reality, there was only one vacant post. As reg ards the appointment of the 3(three) other candidates, it is their stand that s ome temporary arrangements were made and the same did not have anything to do wi th the selection in question. I have perused the records produced by the learned Standing Counsel, BTC including the minutes of the selection Committee meeting. In the said selection , the petitioner secured 15 marks out of a total of 30 and in the result sheet, he was declared fail along with some others. The records have also indicated tha t, in fact, there was one post and necessary corrigendum to that effect was also issued. While publishing the select list, it was mentioned that the candidate a gainst Roll No. 34 has cleared the selection for the lone post of Radiographer. For all the aforesaid reasons, no relief can be granted to the petitione r and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Interim order operating in this proceeding, stands vacated.