IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36812 of 2009 JHAMAN YADAV SON OF GOKHUL YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 27.11.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner is suspected in the present occurrence on account of the fact that the deceased had purchased a tempo from the petitioner, but had failed to pay a sum of Rs.6,000/- which the petitioner was subsequently demanding and, therefore, it is speculated that the petitioner had a hand in the murder of the son of the informant. The case diary has been called for, which reveals that there is no eye-witness to the occurrence nor there is any criminal antecedent of the petitioner. Under the circumstances, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 15.5.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gaya in Chandauti P.S.case No.69 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail and (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be - 2 - present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )