IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2011 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 4396 of 2011 ---------------------------------- CC. NO. 2194/2009 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, ALUVA ...................................................................................................................................... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 & 2 : ---------------------------------------------------- 1. SANTHOSH BABU, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O. PARAMASIVAN, PANATHARA HOUSE, AKAPPARAMBU KARA, NEDUMBASSERY VILLAGE. 2. THANKAMMA, AGED 67 YEARS, W/O.PARAMASIVAN, PANATHARA HOUSE, AKAPPARAMBU KARA, NEDUMBASSERY VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.V.N.SUNIL KUMAR RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. SUBASH, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. PARAMASIVAN, PANATHARA HOUSE, AKAPPARAMBU KARA, NEDUMBASSERY VILLAGE. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. JASMINE FOR R1 ADV. SRI.SHYLESH KRISHNAN FOR R2 THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: DSV/- Crl.MC.No. 4396 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A1 : COPY OF FINAL REPORT IN C.C.NO.2194 OF 2009 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT - I, ALUVA. ANNEXURE A2 : COPY OF AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT (SECOND RESPONDENT) RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE DSV/- N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. ---------------------------------------------------- Crl.M.C.No.4396 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December, 2011 Order The petitioners are A1 and A2 in CC No.2194 of 2009 on the file of JFCM Court-I, Aluva. The offences alleged against them are under Sections 465 and 420 r/w 34 IPC. The second respondent is the brother of the first accused. He is represented in this court by his counsel. It is submitted by counsel appearing for both sides that there was dispute in respect of the family property and the transaction/execution of the document complained of was in respect of the said property. Now that the entire dispute with regard to the property has been settled among the brothers and mother who are the petitioners and the second respondent. In the light of the settlement arrived at, this Crl.M.C. is allowed. Further proceedings in CC No.2194 of 2009 on the file of JFCM Court-I, Aluva is quashed. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. srd 2 3