1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 402/1994 M. Madhavrao M. Rangayya Naidu ..vs.. Corporation of City of Nagpur -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Samarth, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA & C. L. PANGARKAR, JJ. DATED : 27 th August, 2008 None for the petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents makes statement that pursuance to order dated 09.03.1994, the petitioner got all the benefits. Order dated 09.03.1994 reads as under:- “Rule returnable early. Interim relief in terms that pending decision in the petition the respondent is directed to release the pension within 30 days from today on the basis that the petitioner retires at the age of 58.” Therefore, there is nothing survive in this petition. Even otherwise all persons like the petitioner are protected by order dated 21.06.2006 in Corporation of 2 the City of Nagpur ..vs.. Ganpat Bhaduki Thakre Dead through L.R.s.; 2006 III CLR 58 in view of para 13, which is reproduced as under:- “13. The impugned orders are set aside and the Corporation employees except the employees belonging to Class IV are held to be entitled to be superannuated on attending the age of 58 years. Needless to say that, no action should be taken in respect of the employees who have already retired on completion of 60 years of their age whether in pursuance of the order of this Court or otherwise.” In view of above, the present petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE kahale