1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6585 OF 2005 Chandan Ashok Kakde. ..Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. Mr.V.V.Purwant, for the applicant. Mr.A.S.Gadkari h/f. Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : OCTOBER 25, 2005. DATE : OCTOBER 25, 2005. DATE : OCTOBER 25, 2005. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. This is third application filed by the applicant praying for bail. In my earlier order dated April 6, 2005 while dealing with the second application for bail, rejected the prayer of the applicant, although parity is applicable to the applicant as in the case of co-accused. However, for the reasons stated in the order dated April 6, 2005, applicant is not entitled for the bail. There is no changed circumstance. Whereas reasons stated in the order dated April 6, 2005 are relevant even for deciding present application. This application should therefore, fail. 2. The learned APP was asked to ascertain the 2 status of the trial. On instructions, he states that the case is assigned to Fast Track Court and the charges have already been framed. Besides, the matter is now fixed for recording of evidence on 28th October, 2005 and about 38 witnesses will have to be examined. In all probability, trial court would proceed with the trial on the day to day basis. In this view of the matter, no further directions are required. Application is disposed of in the above terms. 3. Ordered accordingly.