IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:- 25.08.2006 Coram:- The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.SATHASIVAM And The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.MANIKUMAR Writ Appeal No.589 of 2002 S.Vellaipandian … Appellant Vs. 1. Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2. The Director of School Education, Chennai-6. 3. The District Educational Officer, Virudhunagar, Kamarajar District. 4. The Secretary, Saradha Vidyalaya Primary School, Ramakrishnapuram, Malli-625 141, Kamarajar District. … Respondents Appeal under Clause 15 of the letters patent as against the order of the learned single Judge dated 14.06.1999 made in W.P. No.1223 of 1992. WP.No.1223 of 1992: Petition presented under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to disburse the salary of the petitioner for the periods he worked as Secondary Grade Teacher in leave vacancies in 4th respondents School and direct the respondents not to apply the G.O.Ms.No.788 Education dated 31.7.1991 in respect of leave vacancies which as and when araise. For Appellant : Mr.T.Sellapandian For R1 to R-3 : Mr.M.Sekar, Special Government Pleader. For R-4 : No Appearance. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ (Judgment of the Court was delivered by P.SATHASIVAM, J.) The above Writ Appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge, dated 14.06.1999, made in W.P. No.1223 of 1992, in and by which, the learned Judge rejected the request of the writ petitioner to issue a direction to the respondents for disbursal of his salary for the periods he worked as Secondary Grade Teacher in leave vacancies. 2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Special Government Pleader for respondents-1 to 3. 3. The learned Judge, after finding that the petitioner did not file the appointment orders relating to his service in the 4th respondent school; and, in the absence of details indicating the periods he worked in the leave vacancies; dismissed the Writ Petition. 4. The appellant has filed a consolidated typed set, containing copies of the appointment orders issued by the 4th respondent/school (vide page Nos.2 to 36). Apart from this, in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, particularly in para No.1, details have been furnished relating to the periods he worked in leave vacancies. It is also stated that the 4th respondent-management had forwarded all the details to the 3rd respondent/District Educational Officer, Virudhunagar. 5. In the light of the materials available in the typed-set and the specific averments made in the affidavit, we are of the view that ends of justice would be met by permitting the appellant/petitioner to make a representation to the third respondent, viz., District Educational Officer, Virudhunagar, enclosing all the above referred particulars with a request to disburse the salary for the period he worked as Secondary Grade Teacher in leave vacancies. The said representation is to be made to the third respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. If any such representation is made, the said Officer is directed to consider and pass suitable orders in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks thereafter. With the above modification in the order of the learned single Judge, the Writ Appeal is disposed of. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ JI. To 1. Secretary to Government, Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2. The Director of School Education, Chennai-6. 3. The Dist. Educl. Officer, Virudhunagar, Kamarajar Dt. 4. The Secretary, Saradha Vidyalaya Primary School, Ramakrishnapuram, Malli-625 141, Kamarajar District. 1 cc To The Government Pleader, SR.38660. 1 cc To Mr.S.Mani, Advocate, SR.38637. W.A. No.589/2002. PLI(CO) RVL 06.09.2006 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/