HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3962 of 2007 Order: This revision is directed against the order dated 4.6.2007 of the learned VIII Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, made in I.A. No.352 of 2005 in O.S. No. 1783 of 2003, whereby the trial Court dismissed the application for impleadment filed by the petitioner. The petitioner claims to be a third party, who sought to get himself impleaded as Plaintiff No.2 by filing an application under Order 22 Rule 10 of C.P.C. before the trial Court. According to the petitioner, the suit agreement in respect of which the relief of specific performance is sought is a forged document and further the petitioner has acquired rights by virtue of assignment deed dated 1.3.2004 and therefore, he is a necessary party to resolve the dispute and he should be brought on record. The trial Court having considered the material on record, dismissed the application by the impugned order. Hence, the present revision. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record. Admittedly, the present application is filed by the petitioner only for impleadment and the trial Court ought not to have gone into the correctness of the alleged assignment deed and the right, title and interest of the petitioner over the suit schedule property. These are the questions which have to be gone into during the course of trial, but not at the interlocutory stage. Hence, the revision is allowed and the impugned order is set aside. The I.A. also stands allowed. No costs. ________________ B. PRAKASH RAO,J Date: 18th February, 2011 pnb