:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.354 OF 2008 PETITION NO.354 OF 2008 PETITION NO.354 OF 2008 Sunanda Amisidh Koli ..Petitioner V/s Koli Laxmibai Yalgonda and Ors...Respondents Mr. I.M. Khairdi for the petitioner Mr. V.P. Malvankar,, AGP for respondent Nos. 3 to 5 CORAM CORAM CORAM : J.N.PATEL AND : J.N.PATEL AND : J.N.PATEL AND A.A. A.A. A.A. SAYED, JJ. SAYED, JJ. SAYED, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 7TH APRIL, 2008 : 7TH APRIL, 2008 : 7TH APRIL, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner has approached this Court impugning the decision of the Collector in formation and bifurcation of Ward Nos.1, 2 and 3 in Kusur/Khanapur Grampanchayat on the ground that the respondents have not followed the procedure laid down under the Government Resolution which is required to be complied with while formation of Wards of the Grampanchayat. In the affidavit-in-reply which has been filed by Tahasildar, it has been specifically stated that there is a Group Grampanchayat of Kasur and Khanapur in South Solapur of Solapur District and :2: the bifurcation and formation of the wards have been carried out after taking into consideration the contagious geographical situation and road has been taken into account and it has been done in accordance with the procedure prescribed in the matter. In the affidavit-in-reply it has also been stated that the general election is over and new body has come into existence in December, 2007. Therefore, in the facts and circumstances, particularly that reconstitution of the Wards having been taken as per the directions of the Election Commission and in compliance with the provisions of Bombay Gram Panchayat Act, 1958 and Rules framed thereunder, we do not find that any error or illegality has been committed as alleged by the petitioner. Further the relief claimed in the petition has become infructuous. Therefore, we dismiss the petition. (J.N.PATEL, (J.N.PATEL, (J.N.PATEL, J.) J.) J.) ( A.A. SAYED, J.) A.A. SAYED, J.) A.A. SAYED, J.)