IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE SECOND APPEAL NO. 298 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL NO. 298 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL NO. 298 OF 2005 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders and Registrar’s orders : Court’s or Judge’s orders ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. s.s. Salunke for the appellant. None for the respondent. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. DATED: 13TH JULY, 2005 DATED: 13TH JULY, 2005 DATED: 13TH JULY, 2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. This appeal is disposed of by order dated 13.6.2005. Today, the learned advocate for the appellant has moved the appeal for speaking to the minutes. In para 3 of the order disposing of the appeal, it is observed in the last line of para 3 that, "the suit for declaration as well as perpetual injunction came to be dismissed". Instead, it should be read as, "the suit for declaration as well as perpetual injunction came to be decreed." Necessary corrections be made in the said order and fresh copy of the order be made available to the parties. .....