IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2011 / 15TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 37756 of 2010(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. ANEY GEORGE, NELLANIKKATT HOUSE, KARIMANNOOR, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 2. SIMI PAUL, PUTHUSSERY, PONNUR, KARIMANNOOR, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI SRI.BRIJESH MOHAN SRI.T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH SMT.DHANYA CHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695001. 2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI, PIN 685584. 3. THE CORPORATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCY, DIOCESE OF KOTHAMANGALAM, REP.BY SECRETARY, KOTHAMANGALAM, PIN 686691. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.37756/2010-I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 5th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T The main prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the first respondent to take a decision on Exts.P3 and P4 revision petitions which are filed under Rule 92 of Chapter XIVA KER. 2. The first petitioner's appointment was approved as per Exts.P1 and P2 orders on daily wage basis. The second petitioner's appointment was also approved on daily wage basis. According to the petitioners, that will deny their claim under Rule 51A of Chapter XIVA K.E.R. In these circumstances, relying upon the decision of this Court in Abdurahiman v. State of Kerala [2009 (2) KLT 105] revision petitions have been filed. 3. There will be a direction to the Government to take a decision on Exts.P3 and P4 after hearing the petitioners and respondent No.3 within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this W.P.(C). No.37756/2010 -:2:- Judgment. The petitioners will produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of the Judgment before the first respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms