"\.A HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURECHHATTiSGARH : BILASPUR SSIMGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ. WRiT PETITION No.2366 OF 2006 Arjun, S/o Pardesi, Aged about 50 years, R/o Viilage Lingiadih, Tahsi! & District Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Building, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Coiiector, Coliectorate, Biiaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Tahsiidar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Municipai Corporation Bilaspur, The Commissioner, Corporation, Bilaspur RESPONDENTS lunicipai Through Municipai (C.G.) Present: Shri Upendra Bharat, Shri R.D. Rai, Shri Sanjay K. Agrawa! & Shri Rajeev Bharat, learned counsei for the petitioner. Shri Utkarsh Verma, learned Oy. Govt. Adv. for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 5*" IVIay, 2006) The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner is in actual possession and enjoyment of the petition schedule property and the Authorities of the Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, the fourth respondent herein, without reason or rhyme and without any sembiance of iegal right over the petition schedule land havs issued the impugned notice stating that the petitioner has encroached ths petitlon schedule land and put up construction unauthorisedly and cailing upon him to remove the construction within seven days and if he complies with the demand, they would provide alternative land eisewhere. If the version of the petitioner is correct, the petitloner can have effective and comprehensive iega! vfSahss.,.^ *-s Subbu -2-— remedy by way of a suit before the jurisdictional Civil Court. The petitioner can avai! of private taw review remedies tike declaration and/or injunction. The dispute brought before the Court reiates to title of the petition scheduie property. Whether it is the property of the petitioner as claimed by him or it is the property of the Govemment or Municipa! Corporation, that question cannot be decided in a summary proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution. In that view of the matter, I decline to entertain the writ petition. The writ petltion is accordingly dismissed, however, resen/ing tiberty to the petitioner to workout legal remedies before the iurlsdictionai Civil Court. No costs. Chief Justice