1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUD ICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 69 / 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1239/2009(D) [Santosh Shrikurshna Nagalkar vs. State of Maharashtra ) ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr S D Chande, Adv. for applicant Mr Anand Fulzele, APP for respondent .......... CORAM : A.P.BHANGALE, J. DATED : JANUARY 28, 2010. Heard. 2. By this application, the applicant is seeking modification of the order dated 8.6.2009 passed by S.R. Dongoankar, J ( as his Lordship then was). It appears that while deciding Criminal Application No.1239/2009 a conditional reasoned order was passed, by which the applicant was directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 35, 631 within two weeks as a last chance from the date of that order. The applicant was also granted the benefit of anticipatory bail upon furnishing PR bond and surety in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- in connection with Cr.No. 72/2009 reported at Police Station, Washim for offence punishable u/ss. 467, 468, 471, 420, 511 of the IPC. However, the applicant has failed to comply with the order dated 8th June, 2009 and has now filed this application as late as on 20.1.2010 for modification of 2 the said order, that too without making reference to any specific provision in this regard. Section 362 of the Criminal Procedure Code lays down that once final order is passed it can not be modified or corrected or altered except to correct clerical or arithmetical error. No other provision has been pointed out in the Cri.P.C. which allows modification of the order said order, which as stated above is passed by S.R.Dongaonkar,J. finally disposing of the application. 3. Hence Application cannot be entertained. The same is rejected outright. JUDGE sahare