IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP-T No. 15520/2008 Decided on:15.6.2010 _____________________________________________ Pawan Kumar. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Neeraj K. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy. Advocate General. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). It is not disputed by the learned counsel for the parties that the present list is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP (T) No. 5861/2008, titled Ravi Kumar versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others decided on 14.6.2010. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Respondents are directed to grant the petitioner seniority as per merit determined by respondent No.3-Commission pursuant to the recommendations made in November, 1998 and this period 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 shall be counted for the purpose of pay fixation. However, it is clarified that the petitioner is not held entitled for arrears of salary. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 15.6.2010 *awasthi*