1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 869 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri Santosh Narwade h/f M/s. M.P. Vashi & Associates for the Petitioners. Shri Vijay M. Vaghela for the Respondent. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 8th February, 2010. P.C.: . Heard Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners. During the pendency of an appeal against the decree preferred by the Petitioners, an application seeking remand of the suit was made which has been rejected by the impugned order. In writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, at this stage, no case for interference is made out. If the final order passed in the appeal be adverse to the Petitioners, while challenging the final order, the Petitioners can always challenge the order dated 6th October, 2009. Notwithstanding the impugned order, if at the time of final hearing of the appeal, the Court is of the view that an order of remand deserves to be passed, it will be 2 always open for the Appeal Court to pass an order of remand. 2. The Writ Petition is not entertained and subject to what is observed above, the same is disposed of. All contentions of the parties on merits are expressly kept open. (A.S.OKA,J) ash