C.W.P. No. 8811 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 8811 of 2011 Date of Decision:- 13.12.2011 Deep Chand .....Petitioner Versus Commissioner Rohtak Division Rohtak Mini Secretariat Rohtak and others .....Respondents CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present:- Mr. S.R. Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Kumar Gupta, Addl. AG Haryana for respondents No. 1 to 6. Mr. Ashish Pannu, Advocate for respondent No. 7. Mr. R.S. Malik, Advocate for respondents No. 8 and 9. **** SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J(Oral). The petitioner, who is resident of Village Bohla Tehsil and District Sonipat, has filed the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, for issuing directions to respondents No. 2 to 7 to remove the encroachment of respondent No. 8 made by him on common Public Street No. 133. In response to the notice of motion issued, respondent No. 6- Block Development and Panchayat Officer, Sonepat has filed written statement in which it has been stated that the land mentioned in Street No. 133 has been got demarcated from the competent Officer and in the said C.W.P. No. 8811 of 2011 2 demarcation report conducted on 3.8.2011 many people were found in the illegal encroachment and against those who were found in illegal encroachment the case under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 have been filed in the Court of Assistant Collector, Ist Grade, Sonepat. It is specifically submitted that as far as respondent No. 8 is concerned, in the said demarcation report he was not found in any illegal encroachment over Street No. 133. Therefore except him against other persons who are found to be in illegal encroachment, proceedings have been initiated. In view of the said written statement filed by respondent No. 6, we do not find any ground to further proceed with the matter. Dismissed. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE 13.12.2011 ( MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR ) reema JUDGE