IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 17TH OCTOBER 2008 / 25TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 27093 of 2008(A) PETITIONER(S): 1. BABY GEORGE, PAMPARA HOUSE, EZHASSERY P.O., KOLLAPPALLY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT 2. SUNNY JOSEPH, VATTAKKATTU HOUSE KADANADU P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 3. JOYCE AUGUSTINE, PUTHYAPARAMBIL HOUSE, MATTATHIPARA P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 4. JOMON IGNATIONS, NADUVILEKOOT HOUSE, KODUMPIDY P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 5. LALAMMA THOMAS, LADIES PALACE, ANTHINADU P.O., KOLLAPALLY, KOTTAYAM DISTICT. 6. DR.H.T.U VARMA, PAMPACKEL BUILDING, ANTHINADU P.O., KOLLAPALLY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT 7. ROY THOMAS SHALOM MEDICALS ANTHINADU P.O., KOLLAPALLY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGEKUTTY MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): 1. THE KADANADU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KADANADU P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MELUKAVU POLICE STATION, MELUKAVU P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 3. THE JOINT R.T.O., PALAI P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.SUNIL CYRIAC,SC,KADANAD GRAMA PANCH FOR R1 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. M.R. SABU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: W.P.C.NO. 27093/2008. --------------------------------------------------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF DECISION TAKEN IN THE MEETING HELD ON 12-8-2008. EXT.P2 JUDGMENT IN R.P.NO. 986/08 IN W.P.C.22539/08 DT. 25-9-2008. [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE. S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 27093 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 17th October, 2008. J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the Panchayat to comply with their statutory duties under Section 227 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act. As per Ext. P1, the 1st respondent- Panchayat fixed parking places for vehicles at Kollappily town. The petitioner's grievance is that the decision in Ext. P1 is not being implemented by the respondents. Learned Counsel for the Panchayat submits that although they are ready to implement Ext. P. 1 decision, for the same, assistance of respondents 2 and 3 is also required. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also who appears on behalf of respondents 2 and 3. 3. After having taken a decision by Ext. P. 1 to regulate parking in the areas under the Panchayat, the 3rd respondent has a duty to see that the same is implemented effectively within the shortest possible time. Accordingly, I direct the respondents to see that all the decisions in Ext. P. 1 shall be strictly implemented as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The initial steps for implementation shall be taken by the 1st respondent by addressing appropriate request to respondents 2 and 3 and on receipt of such request, respondents 2 and 3 shall take appropriate steps in the matter. The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/