IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M-29955 of 2008 Date of decision : 31.03.2009 Anil ....Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ....Respondent. BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Gautam Kaile, Advocate for Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG Haryana. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the State submits that pursuant to ad- interim anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner by this Court, petitioner has failed to join the investigation on three successive dates. Counsel has further submitted that the petitioner has been found involved in three other cases of similar nature. Under these circumstances, I do not find it a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is hereby dismissed. 31.03.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE