IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.02.2010 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R. SUDHAKAR W.P.No. 34524 of 2006 (T) (O.A.No.9156/1998) V.MEGANATHAN ACCOUNTANT SUB TREASURY, PARAMATHI, NAMAKKAL DISTRICT [ PETITIONER ] Vs 1 STATE REP BY SECRETARY TO GOVT FINANCE DEPARTMENT CHENNAI-9 2 SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT EDUCATION DEPARTMENT CHENNAI-9 3 SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CHENNAI-9 4 DIRECTOR OF TREASURIES AND ACCOUNTS CHENNAI-15 5 DISTRICT COLLECTOR NAMAKKAL [ RESPONDENTS ] Prayer Original Application No. 9156 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench to issue a direction to call for the records connected with Memo Na.o.Mu.62035/98/C2 dated 7.10.98 of the Director of Treasuries and Accounts Chennai and quash the same and consequently to direct the 4th respondent to grant permission to the petitioner to draw the house Building Advance. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A was re-transferred and numbered as Writ petition. For Petitioner .. Mr. S. Ilamvaludhi For Respondents .. Mr. B. Vijay Government Advocate https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ ORDER Original Application No. 9156 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench to issue a direction to call for the records connected with Memo Na.o.Mu.62035/98/C2 dated 7.10.98 of the Director of Treasuries and Accounts Chennai and quash the same and consequently to direct the 4th respondent to grant permission to the petitioner to draw the house Building Advance. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A was re-transferred and numbered as Writ petition. 2. The petitioner approached the authority for sanction of house buildings advance, which was rejected and therefore O.A has been filed in the year 1998. He was working as Accountant in Sub Treasury, Namakkal District and was aged 46 years at that time. In the meanwhile, the petitioner would have reached the age of superannuation. Therefore, the question of sanctioning any house building advance at this point of time does not arise. The relief sought for has become infructous. The Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructous. No costs. Sd/- Asst. Registrar //true copy// Sub Asst.Registrar sms To 1 THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU, FINANCE DEPARTMENT CHENNAI-9 2 SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT EDUCATION DEPARTMENT CHENNAI-9 3 SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CHENNAI-9 4 DIRECTOR OF TREASURIES AND ACCOUNTS CHENNAI-15 5 DISTRICT COLLECTOR NAMAKKAL W.P.No. 34524 of 2006 (O.A.No.9156/1998) RSM {CO} TP/19.2.2010. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/