IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2010 / 12TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 22805 of 2010(A) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- ROCKY C.NOROTH, S/O.NOROTH JOHN CHANDY, PANAMKUTTY, KIZHAKKENCHERY, NOW RESIDING AT VI/98 JEW TOWN, COCHIN - 682 002. BY ADVS. SRI.J.JULIAN XAVIER SRI.FIROZ K.ROBIN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. PIN 695 004. 2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, PALAKKAD 678 001. 3. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, K.S.E.B., KIZHAKKENCHERY, 678 541. 4. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ANTI POWER THEFT SQUAD, PALAKKAD 678 001. BY ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J -------------------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 22805 OF 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is challenging the correctness and sustainability of Ext.P10 order dated 07.07.2010 passed by the 2nd respondent contending that the same is not in conformity with the directions given by this Court as per Ext.P8 judgment dated 15.03.2010 in WP(C) 7559/2010. 2. The learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents submits on instructions that the particular contention raised by the petitioner with reference to the mandate given by this Court in the decision J.D.T. Islam Orphanage Committee Vs. Assistant Engineer [2007 (3) KLT 388], has not been considered by the 2nd respondent in Ext.P10 and that the 2nd respondent is ready and willing to have it reconsidered. 3. In the above circumstance, this Court does not find it necessary to go into the merits of the case. Considering the undisputed factual position, Ext.P10 impugned Writ Petition is set aside and the 2nd respondent is directed to reconsider the matter, as already ordered by this Court in Ext.P8 judgment. Final orders as above shall be passed in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE dnc