IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 17667 of 2008 Between: Tadepalli Brahmanandam S/o. Chinna Brahmaiah R/o. D.No.8-100-A, Konthamuru, Rajahmundry Rural Mandal, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies & The Divisional Co-operative Officer, Prakashnagar, Rajahmundry-3. 2 The Rajyalakshmi Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society Limited, Katheru Village, Rajahmundry Rural, East Godavari District, rep. by its incharge Secretary. 3 The Sale Officer / Sub-Divisional Co-operative Officer, The Ramadasu Co-Operative Training Institute, Gandhipuram-2, Rajahmundry-3. ....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.V.R.RUDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondents 1 to 3 in setting off the property owned by the petitioner in favour of respondent No.2 pursuant to CEP Nos.194/06-07, 337/07-08, 338/07-08 and 415/07-08 and passing surcharge orders in spite of pendency of O.A.Nos.30 and 31 of 2008 before the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Tribunal, Visakhapatnam and consequential action of respondent No.2 in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property owned by the petitioner as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, Sri C.V.R.Rudra Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly conceded that against the impugned action of the respondents, the remedies of approaching the Registrar of Cooperative Societies and thereafter the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Appellate Tribunal under Section 76(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 are available. He, however, stated that since the petitioner was not supplied with the material, which he sought for by his letter dated 21-07-2008, he was disabled from availing those remedies. In view of this, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedies as indicated above. Respondent No.3 is directed to furnish the documents sought for by the petitioner vide his letter dated 21-07-2008, subject to relevancy. For a period of two (2) weeks, status quo as on today shall be maintained with respect to possession of the property in question. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP No.22968 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 14th August, 2008 vrn