IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 1677 of 2008 Between: Smt. T. Nagamani W/o Nagabhushanam Lakudaram Village, Kondapak Mandal, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND The Revenue Divisional Officer, Siddipet, Medak District. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.BOLLAM LINGAIAH YADAV Counsel for the Respondents:AGP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to issue authorization to the petitioner to run the fair price shop of Lakudaram Village, Kondapak Mandal, Medak District. W.P.No.6416 of 2006 filed by the petitioner questioning the hierarchical orders passed against her resulting in cancellation of her fair price shop dealership, was disposed of by this Court by order, dated 26.12.2006 wherein all the orders passed against the petitioner were set aside and the respondent was directed to pass fresh orders within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. Complaining that the said order passed in the said writ petition has not been complied with, the present writ petition is filed. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies produced before me the copy of proceedings No.B/2784/2004, dated 28.02.2008 passed by the respondent whereby he re-affirmed order, dated 01.07.2005 passed against the petitioner, cancelling her authorization. In view of the same, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. The petitioner is given liberty to question the proceedings, dated 28.02.2008. The respondent is directed to supply a copy of the said proceedings within one week from today to enable the petitioner to question the same before the appropriate forum. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition, WPMP.No.2077 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 7th MARCH, 2008 kvni