IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37932 of 2009 SHIV KUMAR MANDAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 2.12.2009 Heard Sri Dhirendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. In the renewal prayer for bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance heavily upon 2005 Criminal Law Journal-2086 ( Ganesh Rai Vrs. State of Rajasthan) to submit that repeated petitions under Section 438 Cr.P.C. may be filed on changed circumstances or some new facts. It was further contended that the election to the office of Mukhiya of the petitioner was upheld by this court in C.W.J.C.No.9453 of 2006 and in the counter affidavit filed by the Govt. of Bihar or its officials, it was not denied that the caste certificate was not genuine. Another contention was that the Govt. of Bihar has included the caste of the petitioner under the categories of other backward castes. I had passed the order on 10.7.2007 in Cr.Misc.Petition No.16506 of 2007 after properly considering the arguments and facts of the case and had refused the prayer and had issued the direction to the petitioner to surrender and pray for regular bail. I do not see any reason to deviate from my view and order which was expressed or passed by me. Petition is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )