ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.6525 OF 2008 PETITION NO.6525 OF 2008 PETITION NO.6525 OF 2008 Vijay P.Tambe ...Petitioner Vs. Lalitkumar Uttamdas ...Respondent. Ms.Rekha P.Safari for the Petitioner. Mr.V.P.Sawant i/by Mr.Rustamji Ginwala for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 01st October, 2008. : 01st October, 2008. : 01st October, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . The Petitioner has challenged the grant of amendment application to the landlord Respondent. Admittedly, after filing of the present suit there is a suit No.5361 of 2004 filed by the Petitioner challenging the title of the landlord. The amendment as sought is revolved around the same. In this background, the amendment ought to have been made at the earliest point of time, cannot the reason under the circumstances of the case, to interfere with the discretion of powers exercised by the Court of granting the amendment. 2. Keeping all pleas open, the present Writ Petition is dismissed. ( 2 ) ( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)