IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15068 of 2008 UPENDRA SAH, Son of Sukhari Sah, resident of Village- Dharampur, P.S. Sugauli, District-East Champaran....................................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 14.05.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 06.02.2008 passed by the learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No.1, Motihari, East Champaran, in Sessions Trial No. 903 of 2006 whereby the petitioner’s application for discharge under Section 227 of Cr.P.C. has been rejected. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was not initially charge sheeted rather the petitioner was a witness in the case but by a supplementary charge sheet, the petitioner has been charge sheeted in the matter. Learned counsel for the petitioner has very fairly submits that the trial has commenced. In view of the fact that the trial has commenced, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. However, the petitioner is at liberty 2 to raise all his contentions during trial. With this observation, this application is dismissed. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)