In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Writ Petition No. 18243 of 2009 Date of Decision: 28.11.2009 Umed Singh Rathee …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Gaurav Singh Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner will be satisfied in case representation (Annexure P6) made by him is decided by the authorities i.e. respondent No.2, by passing a well reasoned order. I find merit in the contention raised by counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, respondent No.2 is directed to take a conscious decision on representation of the petitioner(Annexure P6) by passing a well reasoned order, within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Order shall be communicated to the petitioner by respondent No.2 so that he is able to take recourse to legal remedy, in accordance with the provisions of law. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge November 28, 2009 “DK”