IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2011 / 31ST ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 20059 of 2011(F) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- ASHLY PHILIP, D/O.LATE PHILIP, KOYICKAL HOUSE, CHERPUNKAL P.O. KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.H.HAMZA ROWTHER, SRI.V.K.PEERMOHAMED KHAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, RERESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSINI HILLS P.O., KOTTAYAM, PIN – 686 584. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS P.O., KOTTAYAM – 686 584. R1 & R2 BY SRI. T.A. SHAJI, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.20059/2011-F: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE HALL TICKET WITH REGISTER NO. 54162 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENTS IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE PAY-IN-SLIP CHALLAN ISSUED FROM THE CASH COUNTER OF RESPONDENTS FOR THE PAYMENT OF FEES FOR THE REVALUATION. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR SCRUTINY OF ANSWER SCRIPT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE PAY-IN-SLIP CHALLAN ISSUED FROM THE CASH COUNTER OF RESPONDENTS FOR PAYMENT OF FEES FOR THE SCRUTINY. EXT.P.6: COPIES OF THE MARK LISTS OBTAINED BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE EARLIER SEMESTER EXAMINATIONS. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 20059 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result was declared, she applied for revaluation of the subject “Elective III-Digital Image Processing” of VIIIth semester. She applied for scrutiny also and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the scrutiny and revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the scrutiny of the answer paper within two weeks and the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for scrutiny and revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp