IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11916 of 2009 KRISHNA SAO @ KRISHNA PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 21.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no eye witness of the incident. The deceased was suffering from kalazar and there was enmity as the petitioner’s daughter was brutally assaulted by the informant party. Save and except the witnesses appeared to defend the petitioner, there is none to state that the deceased was suffering from kalazar. More over the death was not due to kalazar. Enmity was there and there is specific case that the deceased was taken by the petitioner and others. Thereafter the dead body was only recovered. So I find it not a fit case for anticipatory bail. Prayer for bail anticipatory bail is rejected. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI