HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.16668 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.09.2011 **** Amarjit Kaur & Ors. . . . . Petitioners VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. KPS Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners **** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioners claim that they are entitled to the same benefits as have been granted by this Court vide order dated Manjeet Kaur and others v. State of Punjab & Ors. (CWP No.738 of 2009) (Annexure P5). (2). The petitioners have approached this Court even without representing the Authorities to claim the above-stated benefit. (3). Be that as it may, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to submit a self-explanatory representation(s) to the competent authority who, in turn, is directed to consider their claim and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order within a period of six months from the date of submission of the representation(s) in the light of the above-cited decision. CWP No.16668 of 2011.doc - 2 – (4). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 07.09.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge