IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34485 of 2010 1. UMESH SINGH S/O LATE SOGARATH SINGH, 2. MANI SHANKAR SINGH, S/O RAJ KISHORE SINGH, 3. RAJKISHORE SINGH S/O SOGARATH SINGH, 4. MUNCHUN SINGH S/O KAPILSHEAR SINGH 5. VINOD SINGH S/O ANNANDI SINGH, 6. NAGENDRA SINGH S/O SUDHURAN SINGH, ALL R/O VILLAGE NAWALPUR GODAWAR, P.S. KATHAIYA, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. --PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY 3 25.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the two petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The application on behalf of petitioners no.3 to 6 was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 11.10.2010. Petitioners no.1 and 2 are named accused in this case with allegation of stopping the work under NAREGA on false pretext but work was commenced with machines causing some dispute between the sites. Petitioners carry general allegations and this case stands squarely covered by the decision of the Apex Court in George Pentiah V. State of Andhra Pradesh; 2008 (12) S.C.C. 531. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioners no.1 and 2, in the event of arrest or surrender 2 within four weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in Kathaiya P.S. Case no. 12 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioners no.1 and 2 shall remain present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case. If the petitioners no.1 and 2 fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad