(JMIi i;il:j;:i;-iiti1'i'i!;Ei;"' —E- ResDondents Writ Petltion (S) No. 4135 Of20W Bhrameshwar Tiwari, S/a. Shri Patiram Tiwari, aged abouf 66 yeara, pocupation - Retired AgrioultureConservationOificer, R/o. in front of .P.3. BalodaBazar, Distt. RaipurfCG). Vsrsus 1$ Accountant General of the State of Chhattisgarh Office at Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG). 2) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, General Aciministration, D.K.S. Mantralaya, Raipur(GG). (Writ Petition underArticie 226 ofthe Gonstitution of India) SB:Hon'BfeMr.SatishK.Aghihotri,J. ohri N.K. Ctil-iatterjee, cpunsel rortheBetitioner; Shri Ajay Baraik, Advooate appeare on behalf of Shfi S.K, Standing counse! for Union of india. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. teriwa!, '•^'fliflHmnffW $Passedon this 30*" dayof^uly, 2008) With consent of learned counsei appearing for the parties, the matter is heard finaity. 2) Thiscasepertainstogrievanceofnon-grantofretiraidues. 3) This Court, in the matter of W.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Manda! Vs. The State of Chhattjsgarh & others) and ^other oonnected matters, .dlrected the CommitSee to consider the matter of retria! dues as the disputed question of facts ^..were invotved. The CommitSee was. oonstitutsd by the StaSe Governmeht, pursuant to the order dated 19-06-2006 passed in W.P.N0.1961C006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government ot ChhattisQarb and others), and orcierdateci 1-3-3-2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Ghhattisgam and others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus, this, petrtion is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31" January, 2008 passed in W.P.No. 4642/2004 ulss^K.a W-— ite'S-.;.^ 'fij- Raju (Baijnath.Mandal ^supFa)^) as submittecl?by iearrieci^ counsd appe^ing.te parties. ; •., ~ '.: ,/1-:.....',l.,'-.::r~^ .;::1 ',^.,1 1 . —^";,:-:;' : . 4) , This petition is accordlngiy.disposed crf iri the same teims i.B., 'tl-ie offioe' pf theAdyocateGeneral isdirect'ed'tosendthecasetQtbeComrnittee, within aperiocf of 15 days fforn !.the date /of'i®ceifM;of: ,a copy etf. is^'o Gornmittee shatl issue notioe to the petitioner, officers concerned anci respondent No.4 within a further.period bf 15 days. ~Fhe Committee shall consider'and pass order,;in aGcprdanee w iaw, afteraffording proper Qpportunity:of hearirig to petitioner. The p®titiQnei;ianclthe.ofFioersoQnGemed:mayftleadclitionaldocuments, if nece^ary. The errtiresxetcise^jnMycijM-fiayFnent BFTet]Faldyes,;iflany,1^ petitioner, becompletedwithih'apen^of'fsyFmontbsJTOmtfe ^GopyQftt'iisorier^... ' • ... :! ^ :, :.:.,.•,•;,.'' ^' l':^..;l.':1..:.-^''-..-^11 5);' . ..''Fi-ie^petitioner'shaB'sapply one.complete, set of:fh& petition'toJ;t;he.Sta{g1 couhsel as yroll;^ eounsel foriynion of .incna'-^fp^^ Committee. '' '; ::' /. , "'^, '.;" w,:'';~ ?g—: ' 1 ; 1.7" \" :"':'-.•. 6) In.MS&of gFievance:w ^regafd,to.rnore|ayrfier ctf pensioner^ it is not necessary. fo.3le^ a wnt pNifro^'^^befot^ 4itii^^'^^^^ •The, represeotation/applioation can be moyed before fhe'Pension'Committe^ as statefl" aboye. The Rension eommittee' shall "not refuse :to •::er;iigj-tafn. tbe representatio.h/appiication, if so filed direotiy. ; €^^^:- ^^l^" ,...-•