SCA/880/1994 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 880 of 1994 With SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 881 of 1994 With SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 7373 of 2005 With SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 14146 of 2005 With CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6840 of 2004 In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 881 of 1994 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= APNI SAHAKARI BANK LTD. - Petitioner(s) Versus SHYAM TRADERS & 8 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR GM JOSHI for Petitioner(s) : 1, MR BHARAT JANI for Respondent(s) : 1, MR SHITAL R PATEL for Respondent(s) : 2, SERVED BY AFFIX.-(R) for Respondent(s) : 3, RULE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 4, 9, DS AFF.NOT FILED (R) for Respondent(s) : 5, MR AJ PATEL for Respondent(s) : 6 - 7. MR RAHUL K PANDYA for Respondent(s) : 8, ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL SCA/880/1994 2/2 JUDGMENT Date : 15/02/2008 ORAL JUDGMENT Mr. G.M. Joshi learned Counsel for the petitioners in two petitions and for the applicant in CA No. 6840 of 2004, as well as Mr. A.J. Patel with Mr. Sheetal Patel learned Counsel for the respondent in SCA No. 880 of 1994 and for the petitioner of SCA No. 7373 of 2005 and 14146 of 2005 and Mr. Rahul K Pandya learned Counsel for the respondent No. 8 in SCA No. 880 of 1994 places on record the settlement arrived at between their respective clients out side the Court as per consent terms, and they prayed that the respective petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the petitions in view of the said settlement. Permission granted. Rejected as withdrawn. Rule discharged in all petitions. Interim relief if any vacated. (JAYANT PATEL,J.) Suresh*