1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.7483/2010 Guddi Bai @ Anr. Vs. State Date of order : 4/8/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri R.R. Baisla for the petitioners. Shri Amit Punia, P.P. for the State. ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner no.1 Guddi Bai happens to be sister-in-law of deceased and petitioner no.2 Gyarsi Bai is her mother-in-law. Other co-accused who were arrested including husband and father-in-law and were on bail pending trial, have already been acquitted by the learned trial court vide judgement dated 25.2.2003. Challan against the present petitioners was filed u/s.299 of Cr.P.C., whereas the fact was that they were through out available in their house and police did not take any steps to arrest them, but suddenly they were arrested on 22.7.2010. The prosecution witnesses when them were examined, turned hostile. They are women and therefore are entitled to special consideration in view of Section 437 of Cr.P.C. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 2 Without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioners on bail. In the result, this bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Guddi Bai D/o Pyarji and (2) Gyarsi Bai W/o Pyarji shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No.8/2002, P.S. Harnavadi Shahji, Baran for offence u/s.304B and 201 IPC on each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for their appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/