HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. EaLAsPUR WP. (S) M7565 of 20a? WRIT PETlTiGN UN3ER ARTICL§u22$ GF THE CONSTiTUTiON OF INDIA Aggearance: Shri Semkant Verma, counsei for the petitioners. Shri Pradeep singh, Pane! Lawyer for the state on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (20.1 2.2097) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J Heard. Learned counsei for the petitioners submits that the issue invotved in the case is as to whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of initiai appointment or from the date of comptetion of probation period. He submits that the issue invoived herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunai, Jabaipur in 0A. No.2745/‘89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of MP. and others), wherein, it was heid that the simiiariy situated teachers are entitled to reguiar pay scale wet. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon‘ble Supreme Court in Speciai Leave \ tvz'r/ V,./’/\<Petition (Civii) No.8892i93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble 1‘v y. PETiTlONERS 1 Paras Ram $onwani $io Shri Ramuiai Sonwani, Age about 52 years, Asstt. Teacher RIG Viiiage- Pachdeori, Post- Kathiya No. ”n, Via -— Kharora, Distt. — Raipua’ (C.G;) ‘ Keshari La! Tiwari S/o Shri Bho‘a Prasad, Age about 46 yeafs, Asstt. “ ‘ ‘ Teacher R/o Vi!!age — Khapwi, Post — Madhi, Via - Nevra, Distt. — Raipur (C.G.) Versus __ RESPONDEN‘TS 1 State Government of Chhattisgarh Through:— Secretary, Tribal & Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 District Education Officer Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) Wm) No.7565/2007 Supreme Court uphoiding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scaie from the date of initia! appointment. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that this Coun, white considering the same issue in Ram Kumar Sahu and others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another (W.P.(S) No.813 of 2007) by order dated 12.2.2007, has granted regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. Learned .counsel for the parties jointly submits that this case is squarely covered by the decision of this C;ourt in the case of Ram Kumar Sahu and another (supra). in View of that, this petition is allowed in the same terms. However, this order shall be subject to ail verifications made by the State regarding facts pleaded in the petition. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge V vatti 2