H'...- it' )!11 v w^LcBQiK < ^,yo 2_ (2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) N0. &IS /2Q07 PETmONER ^ r^^. C>is> cP\^^ /-p1 V^c.^ ^^' ^o^^ Shanti Lal Khare S/o Shri Gyanik Khare Age about 47 years, Lo. Div. Teacher, Govt. PrimarySchool, Dongaribhata, Block - Kartala, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1 ^f;;^^".'..- •\}-'::"w-l'" ...-•'" ....-w^^>""" State Government of Chhattisgarh /^ Through:- Secretary, Tribal & Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Districi Education Officer Distt. - Korba (C.G.) '3. Block Education Officer Block - Kartala, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) ./•' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2^6 OF THE CQNST1TUTIQN OF INDIA ^'••...^.' meitCOyRTOFCHHATnSGARHATBiy^SPUR W.P. (S) N0. 615 of2007 Petitioner Respondents Shanti Lal Khare Versus State ofChhatti^aA & ofhera Sind®Bencli: Hon'ble Mr. Justfce Satish K. AgnUiotri. Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for fhe petitioncr. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govfc Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDER ( Passed on this 13th fi«yofFebniaiy, 2007) 1. Learaed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits fhat the petitioner was appoiated on the post of Assistant Teacher vidc order dated 26.1.1982 (Annexure P/1) on a fixed pay of Rs. 200/- p.m.. 2. It is further submitted by leamed counsel for fhe peti.tioner that diuing the piobation period the petitioner was osfy pasd fhe fixed salaiy, though he was entifted to gct inontUfy p^ment on the basis of regular pay scale diiring fhat period. 3. Leamed counsel for fhe petittoncr placed reliance on a decision of fhe Madhya Pradesh State Admmisteative Tribunal pas^d on E34A.199a ia O.A.No. 2745 of 1989 ( Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & ofbcrs). F& that casc tearaed Tribunal after having considered the facts and cucumstences of thfi case directed fhc respondents to niafce payment ofsalaiy in fhe regular scale of pay along with aU appUcabte alfcwances fiom ibe date of appointment of fbe petitioners. The matter was taken-up to the Hou'bte Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by fhe Hon'bte Supreme Court uphoMing the decision ofthe Tribunal to fhe eflfeGt fhat the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitlcd to regutor pay scale from date ofmitial appoiatment. Leamed couusel for fhe petition.er alsqc placcd reliance on fhe order dated 23. 3. 2006 passed by ttus Coiut in Writ Petition No. 2577/2003 (Nem Siiigh Thakur aiid otfaers Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others) and subinits that fhe questipn of law and fhe facts iuvolved ia this petitfon are sunilar to fhat ofin the cases cited above. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents fairty concedes aad agrees wifh •Bie subinission niade by ibc petitioner. In view of fhe above fhis petition stands disposed of in tenns of the order dated 24.8.1992 passed in O.A.NO. 2745/1989 (supra) and fhe order dated 23. 3. '2006 passed by this Court m Wiit Petition No. 2577/2003 (supra). No oider as to costs. Thalmr Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge