SB : HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER 28.04.2009 None for the petitioner. Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, Panel Lawyer for the State. Learned counsel for the State submits that the instant petition was filed challenging tile order of the Divisional Forest Ofhcer, Raigarh Division, Raigarh and in the petition itself it was mentioned that the appeal$ were preferred challenging the ’ orders of Divisional Forest Otiicer. In the return filed by the State Government, it has been pointed out by the State Government that the appeals themselves have been decided on 1. 10.92 and 15. 10.92 and the gtetition has become innuctuous. Accordingly; the petition is dismissed as having become inh'uctuous. . However, the liberty would be with the petitioner in case, cause sn‘H survives, he can file suitable application. /l ,7 r