ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.4559 OF 1993 PETITION NO.4559 OF 1993 PETITION NO.4559 OF 1993 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.Vineet B. Naik with Mr.S.R.Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr.C.G.Gavnekar, Sr.Counsel with Mr.K.C.Shirgupe for Respondent No. 1 and 1A,1D to 1F. Mr.T.S.Ingale for Respondent No.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 11th February, 2009 : 11th February, 2009 : 11th February, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The parties have settled the matter and accordingly filed the consent terms marked "X" dated 11th February, 2009 signed by the Petitioner and Respondent No.1-F. It is also signed by the Advocate for the Petitioner and Respondent No.1-F and Respondent No.2. There is no dispute or any objection about the signatures, identification and authorization of the persons who have signed the consent terms. The ( 2 ) parties, who have signed the consent terms, are also present in the Court. The learned counsel as well as the parties submits that these consent terms are within the framework of law and the record. The undertaking as recorded, is accepted. 2. Resultantly, the present Writ petition is disposed of in view of the consent terms. No costs. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]