IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23698 of 2010 RUPAN YADAV SON OF LATE ROHIN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.7.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the first information report since he is the father of Mukesh Yadav, who allegedly kidnapped the daughter of the informant. The further submission is that in fact the girl is an adult and she and Mukesh Yadav had married each other out of their own sweet will. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 28.4.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in Banka P.S.case No.120 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in - 2 - any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )