IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) WRIT PETITION No._‘/60 é /2006 PETITIONER Smt. Uma Rani, aged about 29 years, Wife ‘of Shri Vishwanath, occupation — “Sah-Sahayeeka” Aangan Badi, Nutrition and Food Distribution Centre, Lohar Tola (Jawahar Nagar), Gram Panchayat Surra, Block Balrampur, 'Tah. ‘Paal, District Surguja (co) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through — Secretary, Department of Women and Child Development, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Union of India, through Ministry of Women’ and Chird welfare, New Dehli. V , 3. The District Collector, RaigeehyaitjQ“ V “x 1 (C.G.) . ‘43’GO? é {‘(HTJ A)» 0 $$W 9/ kl” 4 District Welfare Women officer, and Child Distt. Surguja w ex? i i e i i i *7 i Wn : tiftiiize it {wt-r” Xl-HC-22 ( x pwsw 19.04.20Q6 appears on behalf of Shri A.N. Bhakta. counsel for the petitioners in lWtPNos‘ 1329106) 1330/06, 1331/‘06 1332/06, 1005/06 and 1006/06. Shri Prafull Bharat, counsel for the petitioner in WPNO. 1425/06. Shri SK. Beriwal: counsel for Union of lndia. Shri U.N.St Deo: GA, with AS its authorities. We have heard learned counsel forthe parties. By these petiiions the main gri evance raised by the petitéoners who ‘ are presentty =r~rorking as Sahsahiha in the rural areas of Dis riot — Sarguja for the purposes of distribution of s notification dated 1.9.01 .2005issued treatment has been provided for Aanganwacii workers to the persons on the post ofSahsahika whereas th rural areas have not been given similar treatment. re issued to the respondents and in s‘been med on behalf of the state in > e order dated 10.04.2006: the orders” ed vide notiheation dated 10042006 _ by wl’iich it has been made clear tha who are working in the rural as we“ preferential treatment fer the appoi they are otherwise eligible for the sai . Notices of these petitions we response to the said‘notices reply ha which it hasvbeen mentioned that vic dated 19.01 .2006 has been supersec‘ (Kachhawaha, PtLt forthe State and upplementary nutrition: is that vide hy the State Government prefererttiat the appointment on the post of who are working in the urban areas e petitioners'who are working in the now in the whole State Sahsahikas as in'the urban areas shall be given ntment of‘Aanganwadi Karyakarta if d post. a . -www—aman ‘ww—w Wqdmown- {we are; AV”, l,__ v Shri Prafull Bharat: Advocate . _ WW Wm - aamm Now, in View of above, nothin petitions as grievance ofthe petitione as such the petitions are disposed o stay granted on 30032006 stands v: l \ Sd/- / ‘ L.C. Bhadoo ‘ Judge 1‘ x \ "\‘r\ ‘ Learned counsei for the partie s submit that in View of this order of supersession grievance ofthe petitioiners stands vindicated. g remains to be decided in these writ :rs has already been attended to and fhaving become infructuous and the icated‘ Dhirendra Mishra Judge Sd/- A~ ,HWWQ Mme Ma» . u .,, w [113% %f@§t