IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.598 of 2009 SMT.JANKI DEVI W/O SRI SIKANDAR MAHTO, R/O VILLAGE- BAKHARA, P.S.- SARAIYA, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR AT PRESENT RESIDING AT VILLAGE & P.O. MANSOORPUR, P.S. & DISTRICT- VAISHALI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, NIRMAN BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 2. THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NIRMAN BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, DISTRICT, MUZAFFARPUR with CWJC No.722 of 2009 SHAMBHU RAI S/O SRI RAM EQUBAL RAI, R/O VILLAGE AND POST- BERUA, P.S.-BERUA, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR AT PRESENT RESIDING AT AND P.O.- MANSOORPUR, DISTRICT- VAISHALI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, NIRMAN BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 2. STATE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, GOVT. OF BIHAR, BISHESHWARAIYA BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 3. DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, VAISHALI with CWJC No.914 of 2009 KAUSHAL KISHORE SINGH S/O SHRI RAJENDRA PRASAD SINGH, R/O SADANADPUR, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, NIRMAN BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 2. THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NIRMAN BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI with CWJC No.1162 of 2009 GANESH YADAV S/O SRI BARHAMDEO YADAV, R/O ASTHAL, BISHANPUR, P.O- MIRJAPUR, BANDWR, P.S.& DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, NIRMAN BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 2. THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NIRMAN BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI ******** For the Petitioners :- Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate Mr. Sunil Kumar Gupta, Advocate (in C.W.J.C. No. 722 of 2009) For the Respondents :- Mrs. Nilu Agrawal, G.A.-10 Mrs. Nirmala Kumari, AC to G.A.-10 Mr. Siddharetha Prasad, AC to AAG-9 ************ - 2 - 2 03/02/2009 Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey appears on behalf of the petitioner in all the cases, excepting C.W.J.C. No. 722 of 2009 in which the petitioner is represented by Mr. Sunil Kumar Gupta. AC to AAG- 9 and AC to G.A-10 appear on behalf of the State. They pray that these writ applications be disposed of in terms of the order dated 4th December, 2008 passed in C.W.J. C. No. 17592 of 2008 (Nawal Kishore Ray Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.), as contained at Annexure-6. Accordingly, these writ applications are disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order. (Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, ACJ.) (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) avin