IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24537 of 2001 Between: 1 Zafaruddin Khan S/o. Late Rafiudding Khan R/o. 1-8-321, Opp: to Police Lines, Patigadda. 2 Jameelunissa Begum W/o. Syed Quadri R/o. 1-8-301/1, Opposite to Police Lines, Patigadda. 3 Isharathunissa Begum W/o. Gayasuddin R/o. 1-8-301/2, Opp to Police Lines, Patigadda. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner, Municipal Co-operation of Hyderabad. Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella, Domalguda, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent bearing No.E/1793/2001 dt. 18.10.2001 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 1st respondent to issue No Objection Certificate to the Petitioners herein. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.MOHD.FAQRUDDIN GHORI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.24537 of 2001 ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “…..Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent bearing No.E/1793/2001 dt.18.10.2001 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 1st respondent to issue No Objection Certiﬁcate to the petitioners herein and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem ﬁt and necessary in the interests of justice.” At the hearing, learned counsel Sri Pathan Sihiyaz Khan, representing the learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.30999 of 2001 is also dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J September 9 2008 sh