THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1897 of 2009 DATED: 05-11-2009 Between: B.Swaroopa. ..... PETITIONER And Vadla Siva Rajamma & 3 others. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: Petitioner is the Sarpanch of Tummalapally Gram Panchayat and her election was challenged by the 1st respondent herein by filing O.P.No.3 of 2006. The contention according to the 1st respondent is that the petitioner is disqualified to contest the said elections for the reason that she is having three children. To substantiate that the petitioner is having three children, she filed the birth certificates of those children and to establish those certificates she wanted the records of the school, where the children are studying, to be produced and also for the purpose of giving evidence she filed another application to summon the Head Mistress. The Court below vide its order, dated 06-04-2009, allowed the said applications and the said order is challenged by the petitioner herein. 2. Heard learned counsel on either side. Perused the record. 3. The only contention raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner before this Court is that on an earlier occasion, for the very same relief, the petitioner filed I.A.No.553 of 2007 and the same was dismissed by the Court below on 19-11-2007. In the light of the said dismissal, the petitioner ought not to have filed another application for the very same relief and the Court below also should not have entertained such application and pass such an order. Having considered the said order, this Court is of the view that the said contention is not tenable. The prayer in I.A.No.553 of 2007 is different and by filing such application it is clear that the respondent had not applied for certified copy of the attendance register and also had not complied with the provisions of Section 129 of the Civil Rules of Practice. In fact, this prompted the Court below to reject the said contention advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and his counterpart in the Court below. When once the certified copies of the birth certificates are produced, the same shall be established by way of cogent evidence and it can be done only by summoning the said records and the person who is in custody. Accordingly, I see no merits in this revision. 4. In the result, Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA,J 05th November, 2009. Tsy