IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3500 OF 2008 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3983 OF 2007 IIN SUIT NO.2912 OF 2007 Suhas G. Lotlikar ....Plaintiff V/s. Municipal Corpn. Of Greater Bombay & Ors. ....Defendants Mr.Vaibhav Sugdare i/b Mr.Prachi Tatake for the Plaintiff. Mr.H.C. Pimple i/b Mr.S.H. Ujjainwala for Defendant No.1. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 4TH SEPTEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- 1. The Plaintiff’s advocate remained absent due to a genuine misunderstanding by the reason of the Plaintiff having taken the papers back. In these circumstances, the Plaintiff ought not to suffer a dismissal of his suit. 2. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer (a). 3. The Notice of Motion is accordingly disposed of.