IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15368 of 2009 AJEET SAO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 10.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is the husband of the deceased and he is judicial custody since 1.7.2006 in relation to Dulhin Bazar (Bikram) P.S. Case 163 of 1006 for the substantive offence under sections 304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the FIR the allegation is that there was demand of dowry for which the deceased was used to be harassed. Later on, the informant learnt about the death of his daughter under mysterious circumstances for which the present FIR has been lodged. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has remained in custody for more than three years. The matter stands compromised. The cause of death is due to diarrhea and there is some evidence which has come during the course of evidence in this regard. In that view of the matter, the petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Keeping the above submission and the period spent in custody by him, let the petitioner, namely, Ajeet Sao be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in - 2 - connection with Dulhin Bazar (Bikram) P.S. Case No. 163 of 2006 with a direction that the petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall not abscond. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)