!SMSe, ^''i.tij^-^;:!' f?}^^^ 2.?l.BB! C.F'-i^^t IN THE HIGH COtJRT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. <A M l< Of 2006 PETITIONER ^^•- /^^•''U\''61o.-' '^^^ ...••"".cw"'^'"" ^p'''^' -.-•'' <^:"/" y' ^ .^ "^.^ Jw'1 >'\ ^' oyl RESPONDENTS ," '•.^^••:—^•i'-'^i;'- •^^ ^S^L^^ Smt. Victoria Khakha W/o Shri Radhika Prasad Khakha , aged about . 38 years , s'tt'pation service , Assistant Extension Officer ( Sector Supervisor) Office of the Project Officer , Mahila Bal Vikas, Balrampur (I.C.D.S.) R/o Balrampur , Tahsil Pal District Surguja (CG)." •----^-^y----.-----"-'-- VERSUS -.rl.The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary , General Administrative Department, Mantralay, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). ^-2. Secretaiy, Mahila Avam Bal Bikas, Mantralay, Raipur (CG). 3. The CoUector, Surguja (CG). 4. Project-OfficerI.C.D.S. Balrampur, Tahsil Pal District Surguja (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA isr IBS •a • N ^) l^ @ t» XI-HC-78 3T1^?T W R-)i«h traT31Ri?T9>K 3;ar^(pn?ra', wcflu'iio, Ricjiyy WTWSWT^ •*^)-?^a"^'\^'> ^ 200^, 31T^?TMsf<»> ('i'aI^S'T) CT(ITW:H^(r3f^?T 21-8-2006 Mr. L.C, Das, counselfi Miss DeepaB Pandey, oa advance copy. Heaid both the counsel, By fhe instaat writ Constitution oflndia, thc dated 7-7-2006 (Annexure P-1 shc has been transferrcd Bhalyathaa. Main grievance ofthe p^ are haadicapped and about more than 95 vears more tfaan 100 years. Thc 7-2006 Annextire P-3, but In the ciTcumstencesJ submits fhat the pctittoner to respondent No.l and same to which fcamed cound has no objcction. Having heard leanied llie facts and cacinastaaces opmion on thc merits ofthe for the pctitioner'is just, pctitioner is aBowed to makc gnevances, anncxing a copy c|i resppndRnt Ho. 1 withm in risl E^r the petitioiijer. P|anel Lawyer for the State/respoadents, p|etition vmdex Artfcle 226/227 of the pcti^kiner has questioaed her transfer oider •|l) passed by respondent No.3, whereby fiom Btock; BaJrampur to BIock: finh'Pi-1 Hwnf if fe^t|5j<^|< ^gri^Tw^r |!titioncr is that parcnts offhc petitioner reojwr, mother of thc pctittoncr la aged fefh.er of the petitioacr is ayed about pcjitioner has made represeatation on 22- has been donc in her ease. teamed counsel for the petittoner aai|w be aBowed to make a representatton No.l be diTected to dccnle the ^el appearu^ for the State/respondeats moreolver ackl no^hing aailav res^ondent c()imsel for thc partics, havmg regard to )f thc case aad without exprcssing any c^se, the prayer made by leamed eotmsel few aad reasoaablc. Thereforc, thc ^ detaUcd represcntation raising all her this writ pelition and its aiuMxurcs to ys fivm today an<l »n h'ro, reapondcnt P.T.O. XI-HC-78 T5?s)Tincpr, 0Tf)y'lfi, faciitiy 3^) »11*1WI SfiqT^ ^ 200 3TT^?r'=RW (<^3^T) sn^r^if^TW (raT3IR?Tt>11<h Soma w LT'.' '<\3 y S^nWfff^TW^T 2-- peti^ioner No. 1 is directed to decide the period of 30 days from fhe dat^ objectioas raised by the accordance with law. Witti the directfon aforesaiB Consequently, M.(W.)P,No.| Parties are eatitled for re^resentatioa cerdtfied the petition stands disposed of, p430/2006 also stands disposed of copy ofttus oider. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge ^iPltcT^ Wl?ff W ft^t T ^3:rf^ir'3TI^T offhe petitioncr within a of its receipt, after considcrmg fhe in an objective manner, m P.T.O.