SWGLE EERWH IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT — BILASPUR WRIT pETITION (smo. Li 1gb OF 2009 ASHIM MUKHERJEE, AGED — 49 YEARS, l S/O LATE GOPAL CHANDRA MUKHERJEE, WORKING AS — MALE HEALTH WORKER, AT — COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER, TOKAPAL, DISTRICT - BASTER (C. G.) R/O TOKAPAL, DISTRICT — BASTER (C. G.) PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTs : 1. sTATE OF CHHATTIsGARH, THROUGH — ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE, MANTRALAYA, D. K. s. BHAWAN, RAIPUR CHIEF MEDICAL & HEAH OFFICER, JAGDALPUR, DISTRICT — BASTER (C. G.) / 3. sHIVSHANKAR YAD’AV, - MALE HEALTH WORKER, SUB HEALTH CENTER, DILMILI BLOCK — DARBHA, DISTRICT — BASTER (C. G.) I N Writ Petition under Article — 226 of the , Constitution of India. l NC, s LT HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASNZIR SB : HON’BLE SHRI JUS'HCE PRITINKER DXWAKER W343} N0. 4155 [2009 Ashim Mukherjee PETITIONER RESPONDENTS State of C.G. & Others WET PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TIE CONSTITUTION OF mDlA Appearance: Shri R.K.Kesharwani, counsel for the Detitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, P.L, for the State/resgx No. 1 85 2. ORAL ORDER (07.03.2009) With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 24.7.2009 (Annexure P/ 1) passed by the respondent No.2 by which the representation of the petitioner against his transfer order dated 30.6.2009 has been rejected. Contention of counsel for the petitioner is that against his impugned transfer order dated 30.6.2009 he had filed W.P.(S) No. 3457/2009 and the same was withdrawn by him on 15.7.2009 with liberty to file representation before respondent No.2 and after the order of this Court, he had made a representation vide Annexure P/6 on 21.7.2009 but the same has been dismissed Without application of mind and without considering the grievance of the petitioner as raised by him in the writ petition. A bare perusal of the impugied order dated 24.7.2009 shows that the representation of the petitioner has been rejected after due application of mind and after assigning the reason and therefore this Oourt is of the View that the present petition Iacks merit and the same is accprdingly dismissed at the motion stage itself. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker ‘ / r Judge §:\/