IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16788 of 2010 1. SURSATIYA DEVI 2. BIKRAM RAI ---------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 9.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners are mother-in-law and younger brother-in-law of the victim. Allegation is about demand of dowry at petitioners’ hand including husband and other family members of inlaws, kidnapping and killing of the deceased lady which is denied on the ground that they are residing separate and victim’s kidnapping was reported by the husband by filing a complaint case including holding of a Panchayti against Biteshwar Rai, Ramesh Rai, Mukun Rai and Shila Rai. Separate living of petitioners is mentioned in a certificate issued by Mukhiya and holding of Panchayati and filing of complaint case is creation of accused persons finds no place in the case diary. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioners is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)