1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1539 OF 2010 Ananda s/o Pandit Patil .. PETITIONER VERSUS Ramesh s/o Santosh Patil & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. V.B. Patil, Advocate for the petitioner. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 20 th APRIL, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Application tendered by the petitioner seeking appointment of Commissioner for local inspection has been turned down by the trial court in view of order passed on 7-12-2009. It is pointed out that the suit is at the stage of consideration of application seeking interim injunction. Issues are yet to be framed in the matter. Plaintiff has to establish his case by leading evidence on his behalf. If at appropriate stage of proceeding, after leading evidence, if the plaintiff deems it necessary to renew his request for appointment of Commissioner for the purpose of local inspection, he may tender appropriate application. Trial court may consider such an 2 application , if presented at appropriate stage, in accordance with the provisions of law. At this stage, no interference is called for in the instant petition, in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition stands rejected. 2 In view of dismissal of petition, pending civil application, if any, stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp1539.10.odt