IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.20168 of 2010 Between: Rodda Rama Devi ... PETITIONER a n d The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa and others … RESPONDENTS ORDER: This writ petition has been filed by Smt.Rodda Rama Devi seeking Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to file additional charge sheet against respondents 3 to 13 in S.C.No.183 of 2009 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Proddaturu. 2. Petitioner is the wife of Rodda Chinna Subba Rayudu @ Chinna. He was a driver of auto. He developed intimacy with one Pitchamma. On 24-06-2008 her husband-Subba Rayudu came to Mydukur on auto. It is alleged that respondents 3 to 13 caught hold of her husband and questioned his elopement with Pitchamma. While he was trying to escape from their clutches, the mother of Pitchamma instigated respondents 3 to 13 to kill her husband and accordingly, he came to be killed. 3. A Home Guard filed a report before the Police, which formed the basis for register a case in Crime No.132 of 2008 on 24-06- 2008 under Sections 147, 332, 353, 302 r/w.149 of the Indian Penal Code. After due investigation, a charge sheet came to be filed before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur. The learned Magistrate committed the case to the Sessions Division, Kadapa and the same came to be numbered as S.C.No.183 of 2009. 4. It is the grievance of the petitioner that Police have not properly conducted investigation and therefore, necessary direction is required to be given to respondents 1 and 2 to file additional charge sheet. 5. When the writ petition came up for admission, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 6. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 7. Indisputably, Police completed investigation and filed the charge sheet before the concerned Magistrate and the learned Magistrate committed the case to the Sessions Court for trial and the case is pending as S.C.No.183 of 2009 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Proddutur. If the petitioner is dissatisfied with the investigation she is at liberty to file a private complaint or take recourse available under the provisions in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 8. Reserving the said liberty to the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________________ B. SESHASAYANA REDDY, J August 16, 2010. Note: Furnish C.C. in three (3) days. B/o.PN THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.20168 of 2010 August 16, 2010 Note: Furnish C.C. in three (3) days. B/o.PN