:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE CIVIL JURISDICTION & INTESTATE CIVIL JURISDICTION & INTESTATE CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2 OF 2009 OF MOTION NO. 2 OF 2009 OF MOTION NO. 2 OF 2009 IN IN IN TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 835 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 835 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 835 OF 2005 Kishinchand Laxmandas Aidasani & Ors. ... Petitioners. V/s. Chandra alia Gullu Ramesh Manghanani. ... Respondent. (Caveatrix) None for the Petitioner. Mr. D.P. Desai for the Caveator. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 06TH 06TH 06TH FEBRUARY 2009. FEBRUARY 2009. FEBRUARY 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . Mr. Desai, appearing for the Caveatrix states that he has removed all Office Objections and there is no reason for the Court to dismiss the caveat dated 29th March 2006. Even affidavit in support of the Caveatrix has been filed. 2. From a perusal of the affidavit in support, it is apparent to me that the Petitioners are applying for dismissal of the Caveat on the ground that the Office Objections are not removed by the Caveator’s Advocate. 3. In my view, if there are any Office Objections as pointed out in the affidavit in support, the Caveatrix can be directed to remove the same within a specified time. :2: Accordingly, if the Caveatrix takes steps to remove all Office Objections within the period of two weeks from today, then, Registry to accept the Caveat and thereafter, proceed in accordance with law. 4. The Notice of Motion is disposed off in the above terms. No costs. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)