1 D.B. Civil Writ Petition(Parole) No. 15235/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER D. B. Civil Writ Petition(Parole) No. 15235/2010 Shishram Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Others. Date of Order: 21.12.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain,J. Hon'ble Dr. Mrs. Meena V. Gomber,J. Mr. Anshuman Saxena, for the petitioner. Ms. Rekha Madnani, Additional Government Advocate, for the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Admit. 3. At the request of parties, arguments were heard and writ petition is being disposed off finally. 4. Convict-petitioner has preferred this parole writ petition for grant of first parole of 20 days under the provisions of Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958(hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 1958'). 2 D.B. Civil Writ Petition(Parole) No. 15235/2010 5. Petitioner's application has been rejected by District Parole Advisory committee vide order dated 21.09.2010 on the ground that as per report of concerned Jail Superintendent, conduct of the petitioner during jail custody was not satisfactory. 6. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that concerned Jail Superintendent has not mentioned that conduct of the petitioner was grave in nature during jail custody, therefore, his application for grant of first parole should have been considered sympathetically. 7. We have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. 8. As per Rule 9 of the Rules of 1958, it is one of the requirements that convict- petitioner may apply for grant of parole, if his conduct during jail custody is satisfactory. As per report of concerned Jail Superintendent, conduct of the petitioner during jail custody is not satisfactory. Even otherwise, as per Rule 13 3 D.B. Civil Writ Petition(Parole) No. 15235/2010 of the Rules of 1958, convict cannot claim parole as a matter of right. 9. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the conduct of the petitioner during jail custody, we are not inclined to allow this parole writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. 10. A copy of this order be sent for information to the petitioner as well as concerned Jail Superintendent. (Meena V. Gomber),J. (Narendra Kumar Jain),J. Manoj Item No.S.4.