IN THE HIGH-'GOURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR ‘ 4 CHHATTISGARH q WRITP'ETITION. No....$;f°?§.. /2006 $§§§GLE BENEk£ PETITIONER CHIMANLAL KAMLEKAR S/o LATE M.L. KAMLEKAR AGED 48 YEARS, OCCUPATION: TEACHER, GOVT. PRIMARY SCHOOL, CAMP-2,BHILAI Dism‘; DURG (CO) VERSUS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL K, EDUCATION, MANTRALAYA, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR (CG) RESPONDENTS g ¢§a§§s O1 wg. DISTRICT EDUCATION 231$» W“ . G. xmgaa DISTRICT DURG(C.G) ,J , 1t , A «I OFFICER, “‘ x» Cw“ “PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS TO MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARY AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS” XI-HC-22 W,W 33W, mm mm'w$ .u Hum. ”nu u. 390g; Qi ‘200 mmw Ba Ne 72 Y ZQUE Heard Shri Anurag Jha, pour Govt. Advocate for the State/responi The Case of the petitioner its that he is working as Assistant Teacher since 22-12—84 and as pert MP. the Assistant Teachers who examination on their own expenses increments and order of Government B. Ed. examination on his effect is Annexure-P/5, but the p whereas, simnarty situated he instru stions dated 2442—98 issued by the State of have passed B.T,i., B. Ed. and MEd, after 22-10-64 are entitied for two advance is Annexure~P!1. The petitioner passed his own cost in the year 1991 and a certificate to that atitioner has not been given the benefit iave been granted two advance increments :his Court vide Annexure—P/o. Having heard iearneci counsi and circumstances of the case, withc case, the petitioner is aiiowed to mat of this petition raising aii his grievanc es to respondent No.3 within a period of 15 days from today and in tum the petitioner in the light of in the representation also, similariy situated persons increments and the petitioner’s case increments on the basis of Governr period of 3 months from today, in accordance with iaw. With the direction aforesaid, ti' sei for the petitioner and Shri Sumesh Baiaj, tents; on advance copy. persons i under the orders of the Tribunal and , responc ent No.3 is directed to examine the case of averments made by the petitioner in this petition and if respo 1dent No.3 reaches to the conclusion that have been granted the benefit of two advance is aiso covered for grant of two advance tent’s order, then to pass orders within a e petition stands disposed of. Pat’tiES are entitled for DemfiEC GGpy Of thiS Oi‘dei’. Sdl- L.C. Bhadoo 3i for the parties, having regard to the’facts ut expressing any opinion of the merit of the (e a detaiied representation aiong with copy (newest) é