@ $Emg§e Bwgh @ 1N THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ICHHATTISGARH! WRIT PETITIONS) NobggC” [2009. ’PETITIONER: (/GQind Lal Chandravanshi, son of Nathuram Chandravanshi, aged about 57 years, working as Head Master, Primary School Pinkapaar, Block Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon. Chhattisgarh. versus Respondents 1 State of Chhattisgarh, through ’ Secretaxy, School Education Department, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ‘ 2. District Education Offlcer, \‘ Rajnandgaon, District Rajanandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 3. Block Education Offlcer, Dongargarh, XI District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE ONSTITUTION OF INDIA W ,/ gafa¢§ ’ 9:2? HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5580 (£2009 PETITIONER : Govind Lal Chandravanshi. VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh & Others. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA N SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. A nihotri J. Present: for Shri the Pramod petitioner. Verma, Senior Advocate with K.S.Pawar, Advocate Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Government Advocate with Shri P.K.Bhadur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 25 day of September, 2009) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working as Head Master, Primary School, Pinkapar, Block Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon. By order dated 30th June, 2009 ‘(Annexure P/I) the petitioner has been transferred from his present place of posting to Government Middle School, Salhetola, Block Churia, on administrative grounds. 2. Shri Verma, learned senior counsel appearing vvith Shri Pawar, counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is posted at a_Primary School however, in the impugned transfer order, it has been wrongly mentioned as Government Middle School, Pinkapar, Block Dongargarh, and has been transferred to Government Middle School, Salhetola. Shri Venna further submits that the petitioner cannot be transferred to a Middle School as he is a Head Master of Primary School. However, the petitioner is prepared to join at his transfened place on appropriate salary. A H. v t ka , Learned caunsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that in the event, there is any error in the impugned transfer order, the same shall be corrected at the earliest and appropriate orders in respect t0 the petitioner shall be passed. In view of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner shall continue at his present place of posting till the amended/correct order is passed. Sd/_ ‘f' Satish K. Agnihotri I; Judge Amit m?Ji