THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Writ Petition No.26430 of 2011 21st September, 2011 Between :- Rokkedi Erranna and another .. Petitioners And The Tahsildar, Adilabad Mandall and District, And another .. Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Writ Petition No.26430 of 2011 ORDER:- This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioners, who are 2 in number, assailing the inaction of the Tahasildar, Adilabad Mandal, Adilabad District, in considering their representation for rectification of entries in the Revenue Records relating to agricultural land bearing Sy.No.131/1 (old) corresponding to new Sy.No.131/2 of Mavala village, Adilabad Mandal and District. The petitioners claim that the land admeasuring Ac.2.28 guntas was assigned to their father Rokkedi Nadipi Ganganna @ Ndipanna. After the death of their father, they have been in possession and enjoyment of the said land. They submitted representation to the Tahasildar, Adilabad Mandal, for rectification of entries in the Revenue Records in respect of Ac. 2.28 guntas comprising Sy.No.131/1 (old) corresponding to new Sy.No.131/2 of Mavala village, Adilabad Mandal and District. There being no action on the representation, they approached this Court invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India. When the Writ Petition came up for admission, leaned AGP for Revenue takes notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2. The limited grievance of the petitioners is that non-consideration of their representation for rectification of entries in the Revenue Records by the Tahasildar, Adilabad Mandal and District – R.1. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage directing the 1st respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioners for rectification of entries in the Revenue Records in respect of agricultural land to an extent of Ac.2.28 guntas in Sy.No.131/1 (old) corresponding to new Sy.No.131/2 of Mavala village, Adilabad Mandal and District, and pass appropriate orders after putting on notice to the affected parties. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ________________________ B.Seshasayana Reddy, J 21st September, 2011 smr