IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5681 of 2010 KAMAL NAYAN SHARMA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02/ 23/02/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Considering that the petitioner has absconded for approximately nine years and is presently in custody since 3.8.2009, this Court is not persuaded to enlarge him on bail presently. While rejecting this application at this stage, it is observed that if he moves the court below for grant of regular bail after he completes at least one year in custody, it shall be decided by the court below on its own merits, keeping in mind that he was enlarged on bail earlier when the petitioner shall be required to furnish adequate undertaking of his readiness and willingness to be properly represented in the trial including physical appearance on the dates that the court below shall so direct. The application is rejected. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)