g3 «imam mmm FE l I ! IU I ‘ Whrf’ ’Malaiyya, Retired Assistant char, From Primary School, Block Bhopalpattanam, Beejapur (C.G.) Rio Maddedh, Tehsil Bhopaipattanam, District Beejapur (C.G.) Sukhdev Singh, Aged 65 years, Sfo Shri Dham Ram, Retired Assistant Tea District Beejapur (C.G.), Rio Near Maddedh, Tehsil Bhapaipattanam, District Beejapur (C.G.) ia Ganga, aged 64 years, Sic Channa, Retired Assistant From Primary Schooi, dapaiii. Block iBhepalpatta‘nam, ‘ District Beejapur (C.G.) Rio Maihv Maddedh, Tehsii Bhopaipattanam, District Beejapur mm fstam émmm P. Tea inchoda, District Bhoipara, cher, From Primary School, Block Bhopalpattanam, -Versus- RESPONDENTS - " 1 . / 2M Mor Shri x Teacher, Peg Road, , (C.G.) $mt. Hasrat Begum, aged 60 years, W/o Late Nazir Ahmed Qureshi,'R/o , Chhattisgarh, through the Senior Accounts Officer, Chhattisgarh. HQ. Raipur (C.G.) The District Education Officer, 3a “iffw .".:[,i,r mmqeriaacu) Goria. Police Station, Viiiage Bortalav, District Rajnandgaon (Q.G.) The Accountant Genera! of @ Shri R.K. Kesharwani, counsel for the petitioners. Shri J.A. Lohani, counsel for respondent No.1. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, No.2 and 3. The petitioners have filed the instant petition for: a direction to the ‘zation letters for finali payment of G.P.F. respondents for issuance of author amount wuth Interest @ 12% per a This is the 2'“ round of litiga on Their earlier petitions bearing WP(S) Nos.4377/2008, 4378I2008, 4379/ O8 and 438022008 for final payment of GPF amount were disposed of by t s Court in the month of August, 2008 with a direction to the High Power Retire Dues Committee to decide entitlement of retiral dues of the petitioners afte affording opportunity of hearing to the parties wrthm 4 mont s from the dat of receipt of the case Grievance of the petitioners r that after the earlier petitions filed by the e of the Advocate General referred their Dues Committee, however, the said m . Deputy Advocate General for respondents petitioners were dtsposed of, the ¥ casesto the High Power Retira W n c 3a mm, Wm W WWm........ ......V‘LZOO 31mm (W) am mW ammm mm Hfza 31m! —&,—— mm %:m m '§ m 13$m ' ' Rainandgaon, Wst’nct’ Rajna'h—dg'a‘bn (C.G.) 3. Block Education omcer, Tribal Development, Bhopalpattanam, District Beejapur (C.G.) 4.‘ The Chalrmanithe Special Secretary, Department of Fmance/Lhgh Power Commlttee Penswn Grievance Cell D K S Bhawan Rapur Single Bench: Hon’b 1e Shri Dhirendra Mishra, J. 28-1 -2009:- XI-HC—78 @ W ,’ ,.',_ .UE _ mm V m 200 mamm (113W) mmm e any dealsmn in iFie maEers ‘ana even noficeé’have' not been issued to the petitioners. in the circumstances, the petitioners were compeHed to flle the instant peti‘ Shri Yashwant Singh, appearing for respondems No.2 maintainable in View of the facti of with the consent of the parti s and the matters have been referted to the aforesaid Committee and the m tters are under consideration. mmm mmm‘ BaNe f Since the petitioners‘ e rlier petitions for theg’same relief have been disposed of bye this Court and the matters have been referred to the High Power Retiral Dues Committee onstituted by the State Government as per the directions of this Court and he matters are under consideration of the Committee, theinstant petition maintainable. Accordingly, the p mwee‘am wmarau 'ion for aforesaid directions. Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General. and 3 submitted that the instant petition is not that their earlier petitions have been disposed l have heard learned cou sel for the parties. lied by the petitioners tor the same relief is not letition is dismissed; ; ,:-’/‘ f/V‘ Sdl— . KW Dhirendra Mtshra Judge mast, v-kov om M M» ‘ifi‘g mg Lew—‘W oaltltb ‘