Crl. Misc No. M 29570 OF 2010 ****** Tek Chand vs State of Haryana Present : Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmohan Sikka, DAG Haryana Complainant in person with her counsel Mr. S.R.Hooda, Advocate . ******* The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.134, dated 17.4.2010, registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of the IPC, at Police Station Sohna, District Gurgaon. Counsel for the petitioner has handed over a demand draft of Rs.4.05 lacs to the complainant and states that this is without prejudice to his claim of innocence. The complainant has accepted the demand draft but states that this is without prejudice to all her claims, as the property of which she was wrongly defrauded is now worth Rs.80 lacs and, therefore, this amount of Rs.4.05 lacs can in no way term as compensation for the fraud. Be that as it may, without commenting upon the merits of the controversy, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Consequently, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 28.2.2011 between 10 am to 5 pm or on any other date for which he may be required by the Investigating Officer, and in the event of his arrest, the petitioner will be released on anticipatory bail by the Investigating Officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions Crl.Misc No. M 29570 of 2010 :2: contained in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) February 23, 2011. JUDGE `kk'