-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 73 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4412 OF 2009 Dr Aloysious Sebastin ....Applicant vs. National Stock Exchange of India and others ...Respondents Mr. Chirag Balsara, instructed by Mr. Sanjay Dhulapkar, for the applicant. Mr. K.M. Naik, instructed by Mr. S.P. Salkar for the respondents. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & A.A. SAYED , JJ. DATE: JANUARY 13, 2011. P.C. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the Supreme Court has granted liberty to the petitioner to apply for interim relief again. Since the Supreme Court has given permission to the petitioner to renew his request for interim relief, he requests that instead of deciding the interim relief, it is just and proper that the writ petition may be decided finally. Mr. Naik, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, has no objection if the entire controversy is decided instead of the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Naik states that the petitioner has also preferred an application before the authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act which, according to him, is not maintainable till the writ petition is decided. The petitioner shall not proceed with the said -2- application till the writ petition is decided. 2. In view of the above, the writ petition is now fixed for final hearing peremptorily in the week commencing from 7th March, 2011. Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. A.A. SAYED, J.