THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY C.R.P.No.4568 of 2011 4th November, 2011 Between :- P.Bhasker Rao and others .. Petitioners And Gantla Dayakar Reddy and others .. Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY C.R.P.No.4568 of 2011 ORDER:- The petitioners herein claim that their rights would be adversely affected if the application filed by the respondents No.1 to 4 herein before the Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad, is considered without giving them an opportunity to oppose the application. Nalgonda Ranga Reddy Milk Producers Mutually Aided Cooperative Society has a Board of Directors. Respondents No.1 to 4 allegedly disqualified to be the Directors of the society. Thereafter respondents No.1 to 4 filed O.P.No.98 of 2011 before the Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad, questioning the proceedings issued by the society on 30-9-2011. They also moved I.A.No.323 of 2011 seeking interim suspension of the proceedings dated 30-9-2011 issued by Gutta Jitender Reddy, Ex-Chairman of the society. The petitioners claim that they have been inducted as Directors in place of respondents No.1 to 4 and therefore they are affected parties in the O.P. and that they are the necessary parties in the O.P. They moved petition before the Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad, under Order I Rule 10(2) read with Section 151 of C.P.C., seeking their impleadment as respondents No.5 to 8 in the said O.P. Without waiting for the outcome of the petition, they approached this Court invoking the jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to the Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad, to take up their impleadment application before passing any orders in I.A.No.323 of 2011. Notice before admission came to be ordered on 21-10-2011. An interim stay also has been granted on the even date. Respondents No.1 to 4 in C.R.P. moved Vacate Stay Petition No.6573 of 2011. When the Vacate Stay Petition came up for consideration, with the consent of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties, the C.R.P. itself is taken for final disposal. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the parties. As on this day, Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad, has not yet considered the application filed by the petitioners under Order I Rule 10(2) read with Section 151 of C.P.C. Indeed, the petitioners having moved the said application on 21-10-2011 rushed to this Court invoking the jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking the relief stated supra. In the given facts and circumstances, invoking jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is misconceived. The petitioners have to pursue their impleadment application before the Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad, on the application moved by them. Reserving the said liberty, the C.R.P. is disposed of at the admission stage. No order as to costs. _________________________ B.Seshasayana Reddy, J 4th November, 2011 smr