IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 9TH JULY 2007 / 18TH ASHADHA 1929 MFA.No. 1208 of 2000(A) ----------------------- OPMV.880/1995 of MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, OTTAPALAM .................... APPELLANT: ----------------- PUMAKUTTY W/O ALAVI,AGED 45 YEARS VADAKKEDATH VALAPPIL HOUSE, CHITTAPURAM, PATTITHARA P.O.CHEVAYOOR THRITHALA VIA, PALAKKAD BY ADV. SRI.O.P.NANDAKUMAR SRI.V.A.AJAI KUMAR SRI.K.P.THANGA KOYATHANGAL RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1.V.P.MOHAMMED BASHEER, S/O V.P.MOIDUTTY VETTUPARAMBIL HOUSE THRITHALA POST, PALAKKAD PIN- 679 534 2. AKBAL ALI, S/O T.K. MOIDUNNI TACHARAKUNNATH HOUSE THRITHALA POST, PALAKKAD 3. THE NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.A.C.DEVY THIS MISC. FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J ------------------------------------------ C.M.P. No.6952 of 2000 in M.F.A. No. 1208 of 2000 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of July, 2007 ORDER In spite of specific direction to take steps, no steps taken to issue notice to R2 . So this application so far as it relates to 2nd respondent is dismissed for non- prosecution The award was passed against respondents 1 and 2. So without 2nd respondent also in the party array, no effective order can be passed. So this petition to condone the delay is only to be dismissed. In the result the C.M.P is dismissed. K.PADMANABHAN NAIR,JUDGE es K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J ------------------------------------------ M.F.A. No. 1208 of 2000 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of July, 2007 JUDGMENT Today, I have dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner to condone the delay in filing this M.F.A. So this appeal is barred by limitation In the result, the appeal is dismissed as barred by limitation K.PADMANABHAN NAIR,JUDGE es