IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 6319 of 2005 Between: Vistha Educational Society, Rep by its Secretary, Araku Valley, Visakhapatnam District - 531 0149. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Araku Valley, Visakhapatnam District. 2 The Joint Collector, Visakhapatnam. 3 The District Collector, Visakhapatnam. 4 State of A.P. Rep by its Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 5 The A.P. Tourism Development Corporation, Rep by its Managing Director, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. P.SATYANARAYANA Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4: AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for Respondent No.5: MR. A.K.NARASIMHA RAO The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “I, therefore, pray that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents dated 23.03.2005 in interfering with out possession and enjoyment and attempting to damage the play ground and other parts of the school premises in an extent of Acs.22.10 cents covered by the registered lease deed, dated 04.11.1982 and attempting to dig pits in our school premises for the purpose of making constructions by the respondents for tourism department and threatening to demolish the petitioner’s school premises i.e., Alluri Sitarama Raju Public School, Araku Valeey, Visakhapatnam District including the play ground on any date and at any cost as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and violative of principles of natural justice and Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents not resort to such illegal actions during the substance of the registered valid lease dated 04.11.1982 without following due process of law.” At the hearing, Sri P.Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during the hearing of Writ Appeal No.786 of 2008 before a Division Bench, he came to know for the ﬁrst time that show cause notice, dated 31.12.2004 was issued and resumption order was passed on 18.01.2005 and, therefore, the petitioner is intending to withdraw the present writ petition with a view to ﬁle a fresh writ petition to question the said two proceedings. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, interim order, dated 11.06.2008 is vacated and WPMP.No.8371 of 2005 is dismissed. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 4th AUGUST, 2008. Note: issue copy in three (3) days. B/o kvni