H3G§ (KEERT (5i? SEHAEWISGARE AT BHASPUR WRYI‘ PETITION N0, 3961 of 26M- PE’l‘l’i‘EO‘NER : Smt. Chandramani Eanjam; Widow of Late Sim R.N.}3majara, R/G Ameri Road, Biiaspur, Tahsi} & Eistrict Biiaspur '(QGJ VERSUS RES?ONDEN'1‘S : 1. Smte of Chhamsgarh, Through the Secreiary, Foyest Depamiiem, DKSEhaw-m, Raipur (CGJ 2. Union 01" im€ia, Through the Secretary, Ministry of 1*‘orestg New .Deihi. 3. State of Madl‘iya PradeSh, Through Chief Conservater of Forest, Madhya Pradesh. 4.‘ The Cousorvator ofFores‘L, Bilasfmr (C.G.) 5. T136 District Forest Offlcer, Raigarh, Dismct Raigarh (CG) 6. The CoHector, Raigarh, District Rajgarh (CG) WRIT PETlTiON UNDER ARrI‘ICLE 226/227 O¥ THE CONSTITUTEON OF ENDEA EB iion’bie Shri Satis}: K. Agnihoti'i. J. Present: None for the petiiioner. MS. Sum: Jain, Pam} Lawyer for the Statolrespondems 1 & 4 io 6. ORAL OREWETR {Passed oni’fh day of Augusx, 2068) The matter is caiied for hearing twice. None appears nor any represemation is made ‘on behalf of the petiiioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. in View ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want ofprosecution. Consequentiy, MON)? No, 4367/2004, a}so stands dismissed. 1!, Sd/- satish K. Agnihw‘f Judge