1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9141 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 9141 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 9141 OF 2007 Khurshid Saifuddin Bohari. .. Petitioner. vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. Vikas M. Mali for Petitioner. Mr. P.I. Khemani, AGP., for Respondent nos.1 to 3. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATE: 23rd JANUARY, 2008. DATE: 23rd JANUARY, 2008. DATE: 23rd JANUARY, 2008. P.C. . The petitioner has impugned the order passed by the Hon’ble Minister for Revenue wherein the respondent-owners of the land in question made a specific prayer that they do not want to proceed with the enquiry which has been initiated on the application of the petitioner in his capacity as their power of attorney holder. It was the case of the principal, owners of the land, that the power of attorney has been revoked. This was accepted by the Hon’ble Minister and the impugned order came to be passed that the hearing 2 of the enquiry stands cancelled. 2. The contention of the petitioner is that the power of attorney was irrevocable power of attorney and, therefore, such an application could not be entertained by the Hon’ble Minister. 3. We do not find that the impugned order suffers from any error or illegality. In case the petitioner is claiming his right under the power of attorney, and according to him, it is an irrevocable power of attorney, he may seek alternative remedy available to him under the law. With this observation, the petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (Smt. Nishita Mhatre, J.) (Smt. Nishita Mhatre, J.) (Smt. Nishita Mhatre, J.)