IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO : 25338 of 2004 Between: G.N.Narasimha Rao, S/o.Late G.Chandraiah, O/o.The Deputy Director, social Welfare, Ongole, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Collector and District Magistrate, (Social Welfare) Ongole, Prakasam District. 2 The Commissioner of Social Welfare, Govt., of A.P.Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in terminating the services of the petitioner vide Rc.A1/3240/2003 dated 26-12-2003 as illegal, arbitrary, vindictive, violation of principles of natural justice apart from setting aside the orders of the Hon'ble A.P.A.T. rejecting granting of interim orders in O.A.No.862/2004 dated 6-2-2004 as illegal and arbitrary and pass such other order or further orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:M/S B.KAVITA YADAV Counsel for the Respondents.: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following : To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies 3.2CCs to O R D E R: (PER GB.J) 1. This writ petition is filed at the stage when the notice was ordered on interim relief and notice before admission was recorded by the Tribunal. 2. The petitioner is challenging the order of termination before the Tribunal. Since the Tribunal issued notice on interim relief, the present writ petition is filed contending that the Tribunal ought to have granted interim orders. Therefore, the petitioner seeks appropriate directions. 3. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, we are not inclined to interfere with the matter. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as devoid of merit. However, it is open for the petitioner to seek appropriate orders before the Tribunal, after notice is served on respondents. No costs. _________________ G.BIKSHAPATHY.J ________________ P.S.NARAYANA.J Dt.19.01.2004 Tjs To 1. The Collector & District Magistrate (Social Welfare) Ongole, Prakasam District. 2. The Commissioner of Social Welfare, Government of A.P., Hyderabad. 3. 2 C.Cs to the G.P. for Social Welfare, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT) 4. 2 C.D.Copies.