THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Tr.C.M.P. No.116 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner is the wife of the respondent. Their marriage took place in the year 2007. Both of them have lived together for some time, in U.S.A. Differences have arisen thereafter. At present, the petitioner is staying at U.S.A., whereas the respondent is residing at Hyderabad. The respondent filed F.C.O.P.No.20 of 2011 in the Family Court, Secunderabad, under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act (for short ‘the Act’). On the other hand, the petitioner, through her father, filed F.C.O.P.No.269 of 2011, for the same relief, in the Family Court, Hyderabad. This application is filed with a prayer to transfer F.C.O.P.No.20 of 2011 to the Family Court, Hyderabad. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent. It is a rare case, where two applications are filed for the same relief, by both the parties, in different Courts. Both of them are eager to join the company of the other. There should not have been any difficulty, much less the need, to approach the Court. The ground pleaded by the petitioner is that her father, who is pursuing the matter, is aged 70 years, and it is difficult for him to pursue the matter in the Family Court, Secunderabad. Since the relief claimed in both the Tr.C.M.Ps., is one and the same, they have to be heard by only one Court. Further, hardly there is any necessity to conduct trial. The Court which takes up the matter, can summon both the parties, ascertain their views, and pass appropriate orders. It is felt that the request of the petitioner can be acceded to, and that no prejudice would be caused to the respondent. Hence, the Tr.C.M.P. is allowed, and O.P.No.20 of 2011 is transferred from the Family Court, Secunderabad to the Family Court, Hyderabad. On such transfer, it shall be taken up along with F.C.O.P.No.269 of 2011. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.29-04-2011. KO