HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1879 of 2009 DATE:03.03.2010 Between: Anjanappa and another … Petitioners And Pedda Sawarappa and others … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1879 of 2009 ORDER: This revision is directed against the order dated 30.03.2009 passed by the learned II Additional District Judge at Mahaboobnagar in C.M.A.No.17 of 2008, dismissing the said C.M.A. while confirming the order dated 02.05.2008 in I.A.No.187 of 2008 in O.S.No.23 of 2008 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Gadwal. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners herein instituted O.S.No.23 of 2008 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Gadwal, against the respondents herein, for declaration that the amounts lying to the credit of E.P.Nos.898 of 2007 in O.P.No.145 of 1999, E.P.No.899 of 2007 in O.P.No.146 of 1999 and E.P.No.900 of 2007 in O.P.No.147 of 1999, belong to them. Along with the suit, they also filed a petition in I.A.No.187 of 2008 seeking interim injunction restraining the respondents from withdrawing the said amounts. The court below, after hearing both sides and going through the oral and documentary evidence, dismissed the I.A. by an order dated 02.05.2008. As against the said order, the petitioners filed C.M.A.No.17 of 2008 before the II Additional District Judge, Mahabubnagar, and the said appeal was also dismissed, by an order dated 30.03.2009. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioners preferred this revision. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel for the respondents. 4. This Court, while ordering notice before admission, granted interim injunction, as prayed for, in favour of the petitioners, by an order dated 22.04.2009. 5. During the course of hearing, the learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that even before passing the order dated 22.04.2009 granting interim injunction restraining the respondents from withdrawing the amounts lying to the credit of the aforesaid E.Ps., the respondents had withdrawn the amounts. 6. In the light of the subsequent developments, I see no merits in this revision, and accordingly, the revision is liable to be dismissed. 7. In the result, the civil revision petition is dismissed. However, withdrawal of the amounts lying to the credit of the above mentioned E.Ps. by the respondents, is subject to the result in O.S.No.23 of 2008 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Gadwal. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J 3rd March, 2010 cbs HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1879 of 2009 (Dismissed) 3rd March, 2010 CBS