6i Wwwf‘ @ «WE gmw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH w.P.(s) No. 12,14 H 12011 /, Smt. Rashmi Shukla W/o Shri A. K. Shukla', Aged about 50 years, Occupation —— Lecturer, Govt. Higher PER ETITION \ ‘ \Ax ‘ Jgwum ..-- ‘ “ Mg \; WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Mexlw' (CG). ' 1. State of Chhattisgarh, . Through — The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Raipur (C.G.) Joint Director, Accounts, 2. Treasury and Pension, Raipur ’xx ice.) 3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 1244 OF 2011 o? (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of lndia) Single Bench : Hon‘ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, Ji Present :- Shri Vipin Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y,S.Thakur, Dy. Advocate Genera! for the State/ respondents. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 7‘“ day of March} 201 1) u Heard learned counsei for the parties. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to benefit of two advance increments on account of the fact that the petitioner has passed B.Ed. examination on 08.07.1986 before entering into the service i.e. on 30.121986, at her own cost. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present case is no longer res integra, as the same has been considered and decided by the Supreme Court in Ashe Saxena v. State of MP. <3 Ors.’ as well as by this Court in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj v. Municipal Corporation, Durg and anotheiz and Gopesh Kumar Verma v. ,The State Govt. of ohhartisgam and anothef. Learned counsel further submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision as aforestated. Thus, the petitioner may ' 2009 (iii) MPJR (SC) 59 3 WP (S) N041 30 or 2005 2 2006 (ii) MPJR-CG 96 PETRTIGNER Smt‘ Rashmi Shukia Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others Am'lt be permitted to make a representation to decide her case in the light of aforestated decisiona subiect to verification of the facts asto whether the petitioner has acquired B‘Ed. certificate on her own eipenses before entering into service. Learned ccunsei appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same wiii be considered and decided, in accordance with iaw and in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena (supra), within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. tn view ct foregoing, according to the learned counsei appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed 9L WM Sdl- spmsa K Ammo“ 7.