IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 705 OF 2004 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 705 OF 2004 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 705 OF 2004 M/s. Advance Paints Ltd. ..Plaintiffs versus M/s. Marco Engineers ..Defendants Mr. R. V. Bhagat i/b. M/s. Vasant & Co. for the Plaintiffs. None for the Defendants. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. DATE : 11TH OCTOBER 2004. DATE : 11TH OCTOBER 2004. DATE : 11TH OCTOBER 2004. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : . Counsel for the Plaintiffs present. Advocate Ghanshyam Mishra has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the defendants along with his letter head. He has admitted that the summons has been served upon the defendants on 14.5.2004 and he has undertaken to inform the plaintiffs about filing of the vakalatnama. Counsel for the Plaintiffs state that so far he has not received any intimation from the defendants advocate about filing of the Vakalatnama, which is mandatory under Order 37. . The matter is on board for exparte hearing. Nobody is present for the Defendants. Counsel for the plaintiffs file affidavit of service and compilation of original documents. The same is taken on record. Under these circumstances, the suit stands decreed as prayed for with 12% future interest from the date of the suit till realisation and costs. Refund of court fees, as per the Rules. Decree be drawn up accordingly. Certified copy expedited. *****