wp8382.10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8382 OF 2010 Somnath s/o Bajrang Tanpure .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.J. Salgare, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.H. Dighe, AGP for the State. ===== CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE : 14 th DECEMBER, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Since no order prejudicial to the interest of respondent nos. 4 and 5 is being passed, the requirement of issuing notice to them is waived. Learned AGP Mr. V.H. Dighe appears for respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3. 2 Limited grievance raised by the petitioner is that though respondent no. 4 is held to be disqualified by respondent no. 3, respondent no. 2 has granted stay on 30-6-2007 and the appeal of respondent no. 4 has not been wp8382.10 2 heard for a period of almost three years. It is further contended that though respondent no. 4 is held to be disqualified, he is continuing in the office though he is not entitled to do so. 3 We, therefore, dispose of the petition by directing respondent no. 2 to decide the appeal filed by respondent no. 4 after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties, within a period of three months from today. 4 Authentic copy of the order be supplied to the parties. ( R. M. BORDE ) ( B. R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb