IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Interim Relief Application No.2803 of 2010 In Writ Petition No. 575 of 2010 (M/S) 1. Altaf 2. Irshad. Both sons of Sri Muzaffar Husain, R/o Jabalpur, Pargana and Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar. ……Petitioners. Versus 1. Collector/District Deputy Director of Consolidation, Haridwar, District Haridwar. 2. Settlement Office Consolidation, Haridwar camp Roorkee. 3. Sub-Divisional Magistrate/Sub Divisional Officer, District- Haridwar. 4. Consolidation Officer, Rookee, District Haridwar. ….Respondents. Mr. M.S. Tyagi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. C.S.C. for the respondents. Dated: -23-04-2010 Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to interfere with the eastern boundary line of Village-Jabalpur Ahatmal without adopting the due process of law. During the course of argument, the learned counsel for the petitioners have submitted that the representation is pending before Collector/ District Deputy Director of Consolidation, Haridwar, District Haridwar for disposal but no decision has been taken by the respondent No. 1 till today. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that if the order is passed to decide the representation, he has no objection. The prayer made by the petitioners is innocuous in nature. 2 The respondent No.1 i.e. Collector/District Deputy Director of Consolidation, Haridwar, District Haridwar, is directed to take decision on the representation of the petitioners dated 19-3-2010 annexed as annexure No.6 to the writ petition, expeditiously preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. With the said direction, the writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Interim Relief Application stands disposed of accordingly. (B.S.Verma, J.) 23-04-2010 MK