IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8837 of 2011 RAKESH PATEL @ CHUNNU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR 02/ 28.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State assisted by the learned counsel for the informant. Ghosi (Okari) P.S. Case no. 188/2010 was registered under sections 452, 323, 354,114 of the IPC against the petitioner and others on the allegation that petitioner entered the house of the informant and tried to outrage her modesty. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that after investigation, the police submitted charge sheet under bailable sections but the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate differed with the finding of the police and took cognizance under non-bailable section. It is also pointed out by him that prior to the lodging of the present case, several cases were pending between the parties. So, aforesaid fact clearly suggests that there was an enmity and litigation between the parties. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let petitioner, Rakesh Patel @ Chunnu, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in Ghosi (Okari) P.S. Case no. 188/2010. Furthermore, the petitioner shall make his attendance - 2 - before the Officer Incharge Ghosi (Okari) Police station on second day of every month for a period of three months and if in that period anything is found by the officer lncharge of the above stated police station, he may file petition before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad for cancellation of the bail bonds of the petitioner. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)