IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 5829 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 30, 2009 Ram Kanwar @ Ram Kumar and others. .. Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE J.S. KHEHAR, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present : Mr. Shailendra Jain, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Palika Monga, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondents No. 1, 2 and 4. Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate, for respondent No.3. J.S. Khehar, J. (Oral) C.M. No. 12576 of 2009 CM is allowed. Replication filed on behalf of the petitioners is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. C.W.P. No. 5829 of 2008 Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing for some time states, that the petitioners will be satisfied, if respondent No.1 is directed to reconsider the claim of the petitioners for release of their land from acquisition proceedings by taking into consideration the policy dated 26.10.2007. It is acknowledged by the learned counsel for the petitioners, CWP No. 5829 of 2009 that the decision taken by respondent no.1 will be binding and acceptable to the petitioners. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the disposal of the instant writ petition in terms of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.1 to reconsider the claim of the petitioners and pass a well-reasoned speaking order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners either in person or through counsel. Needless to mention that in terms of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the order passed by respondent no.1 shall be binding on the petitioners. Respondent No.1 shall take a final decision in the matter on the receipt of a representation at the hands of the petitioners along with the certified copy of the instant order within two months thereafter. In case, no representation is made by the petitioners within two months from today, it will be presumed that the petitioners do not wish to press their claim. Disposed of in the aforesaid terms. A copy of this order be furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioners dasti on payment of usual charges. ( J.S. Khehar ) Judge July 30, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2