1 CA-4723.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4723 OF 2010 Kailas @ Aba Narayan Gadekar .... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Shri Dilip Bodake for the Applicant. Ms R.V. Newton, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: OCTOBER 29, 2010 P.C: The applicant, who had been admitted to bail by the Court of Sessions on 15-4-2006, was directed to be taken into custody by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge on 8-10-2010 because the applicant remained absent at the trial. There can be no doubt that if an accused absconds after being bailed out, he should be denied bail again. But the case of an accused absconding need not be confused with the case of the accused who remains absent. In this case, though the applicant had remained absent before the Court and when a warrant was issued, he himself appeared before the Court along with 2 CA-4723.10 surety. The learned Addl. Sessions Judge could have taken this into consideration but it seems that because of instructions in the criminal manual, the learned trial Judge felt that as the applicant had remained absent at the trial, he was not entitled to be released on bail again. Considering the fact that the applicant had himself appeared before the learned trial Judge, the applicant be released on bail in Sessions Case No.23 of 2007 arising out of C.R. No.11 of 2006, registered at Malshiras Police Station, Taluka Malshiras, District Solapur on his furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs.50,000/- on the condition that the applicant will attend the police station concerned on every Sunday in between 10:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. till the trial is over. The application accordingly stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)