IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 25TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 6TH PHALGUNA 1931 RP.No. 1260 of 2009(O) ------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.27951/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION ----------------------------------- M.HABEEB, PULIMOOTTIL, KOMALLOOR MURI, CHUNAKARA. BY ADV. MR.R.KRISHNA RAJ RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT -------------------------- C.K.VIJAYAKHOSH, POYATTUVAYALIL VEEDU, ELIPPAKKULAM, VALLIKUNNAM, MAVELIKKARA. BY ADVS. MR.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN, MR.T.S.HARIKUMAR, MR.K.JAGADHEESH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J ------------------------------------- R.P No.1260 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C) No. 27951 OF 2009 -------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of February 2010 ORDER The petition has been filed to review the judgment dated 13.11.2009 dismissing the above writ petition challenging Ext.P8 order passed by the court below. Negativing the objections canvassed by the petitioner/judgment debtor, the court below had directed for settling the proclamation for sale limiting it to one are of the property in the proclamation schedule filed by the decree holder. Present review has been filed seeking indulgence of this court to enable the petitioner/judgment debtor to pay the outstanding amount in instalments. Substantial amount covered by the decree has already been paid is canvassed for reviewing the judgment rendered by this court. The learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted, if given a breathing time, petitioner shall deposit the balance amount also due under the decree for avoiding sale of his property. The grounds canvassed are not at all sufficient to review the previous judgment rendered by this court; but, having regard to the submissions made and taking note of the facts and circumstances R.P No.1260 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C) No.27951 OF 2009 Page numbers presented, I direct the court below to keep in abeyance the settlement of proclamation and its publication for a period of six weeks from the date of this order. If within that time the balance decree amount is remitted, the court shall pass appropriate orders. Otherwise the sale shall proceed in accordance with law. Subject to the above direction, the review petition is closed. Sd/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE vdv