IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1741 of 2010 ====================================================== Med Nath Thakur, working as Head Assistant (Acting) C.M. College, Darbhanga under Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Darbhanga, Son of late Chhema Kant Thakur, Post – K.D.S.U., resident of mohalla – Kedrabad, Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Vice-Chancellor (Smt. Padmasa Jha), Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Darbhanga. 3. The Registrar (Sri Bimal Kumar), Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Darbhanga. 4. The Finance Officer (Sri V.Singh), Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Darbhanga. .... .... Respondents. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ratan Kumar Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Sc12) Mr. P.N.Shahi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. MRIDULA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. MRIDULA MISHRA) 05/ 27-09-2011 Petitioner has filed this application for initiating a proceeding of contempt against the opposite parties, who are authorities of L.N. Mithila University due to non-compliance of order dated 18.01.2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 13636 of 2009. Petitioner is working as Head Assitant in C.M. College, Darbhanga and his grievance was for payment of arrears of difference of salary, difference of D.A. and other items for which he is legally entitled. The writ application Patna High Court MJC No.1741 of 2010 (5) dt.27-09-2011 2 / 2 2 was disposed of, directing the respondents-authorities to consider the representation of the petitioner and make payment of legal dues, in case any statutory interest is payable, that should also be paid. Show cause has been filed on behalf of University stating that entire dues of the petitioner has been paid and the residual amount of Rs.1,55,249/- was also paid to the petitioner dive cheque no. 1023201 dated 25.11.2010 after deducting income tax as per the rule. Counsel for the petitioner submits that statutory interest has not been paid. Since, all other amounts have already been paid to the petitioner earlier and only the residual amount has been paid to him and the petitioner has also not indicated that on which amount statutory interest is payable to him, I find that direction of this Court is duly been complied. This contempt application is disposed of. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J)