111 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR .D.iyi.SI.Q.NB.E.N.CH CORAIVI: HON'BLESHRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ & HON'BLE SHRI D.R. DESHMUKH, J. WRITPETITION N0.2212 OF 2004 PETITIONER Manoj Chandrakar, aged about 38 years,. S/o. Shri Bhukhan Lal Chandrakar, Patwari, P.C. No. 15 R/o Panchwati Colony, Qtr. No. C-4, Ratanabandha, Dhamtari, Tahsil & Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) RESPQNDENTS VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Revenue, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Collector DistrictDhamtari(C.G.) 3. Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) District Dhamtari (C.G.) 4. Ramesh Kumar Lahare, Agedabout 35 years, S/o. Shri Ghasi Ram Lahare, Patwari, Posted at P.C. No. 15/49, Hatkeshar, Tah. & District Dhamtari (C.G.) 5. Vishnu Kumar Gupta, Aged about 43 years, S/o Shri Udayram Gupta, Patwari at Present transfer to P.C. No. 50-A/16, Tahsil Dhamtari R/o Post Office Ward, Ama Talab Road, Dhamtari (C.G.) 6. Ramesh Tiwari, Aged about 40 years, S/o. Shri Govind Prasad Tiwari, Patwari, Posted at P.C. No. 10, Bhakhara, Tahsil Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) 7. Sukhdeo Dhruw, S/o Shri B.R. Dhruw, Patwari, Posted at P.C. No. 28, Kharenga, Tahsil & Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) 8. Chinta Ram Soni, S/o. Late Mansha Ram Soni, Patwari, Posted at P.C. No. 16, Tahsil Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) -?/- '^-"((•' •-i: Present: Mr. Ashok Swarnakar, learned counsetfor the petitioner. Mr. V.V.S. Murthy, leamed Dy. G.A. for the State/respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Vimtesh Bajpai,learned counsel for the resppndent No.4. Mr. Sumit Verma, learned counsel for the respondent No. .5. ••*•• WjRrT.PETtT!Q!\l;NQ^22110F.2004 PETITIQNER Vasudeo Bhoi,aged about35 years, S/o. Shri Bastam Bhoi R/o Vivekanand Nagar, Street No.3, Dhamtari, Tahsil and District Dhamtari (C.G.) RESPONDENTS 1& yERSUS 1. TheStateofChhattisgarh ThroughSecretary Department ofRevenue, . Mantrataya, D.K.S .Bhawan Raipur(G.G.) 2. Tbe Gollector Distriet Dhamtari (C.G.) 3. Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) DistrictDhamtari (C.G.) 4. Vishnu Kumar Gupla, Aged abcMjtj 43 years, S/o Shri Udayram Gupte, Patwari at Presenttransfer to P.C.No. 50-A/16, Tahsil Dhamtari R/o Pest OfRce Ward, Ama Tatab Road, Dhamtari<C.G.) 5. RameshTivrari,Agedabout40years, S/o. Shri Govind Prasad Tiwari, Patwari, Posted at P.C. No. '10, Bhakhara, Tahsil Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari :(C.G.) : . 'S 6. jRamesh Kumar Lahare, Aged aBoutiSS years, S/o, Shri Ghasi Ram Uahare, Patwari, Posted at P.C. N6. ;iaf49, Hatkeshar, Tah. & District Dhamtari '..(e.G.) , : :: ; :• \;.;. r 7. Sukhdeo Dhruw,S/o Shri B.R. iDhruw, Patwari, Posted at P.e. Nb.! i28, ! Kharenga, Tahsit & Distt. Dhgmtari ^G) :: :'I..UIi: 8. i Ghinta Ram Soni, S/o. Late IMansha j Ram Soni, Palwari, Postecl at R.C.iNo. j 16,Tahsi| Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G^) aiiii.>.tj,iai^ 113 -3- Present: Mr. Ashok Swarnakar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. V.V.S. Murthy, learned Dy. G.A. for the State/respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Vimlesh Bajpai, learned counsel for the respondent No.5. Mr. Sumit Verma, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4. WRLT PETITIQN N0.3342 QF 2003 PETLTIONER Manoj Chandrakar Aged about 37 years, S/o Shri Bhukhan lal Chandrakar, R/o Panchwati colony, Qtr. No. C-4, Ratna Bandha, Dhamtari, Tahsil and Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS •-./• RESPONDENTS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through, its Secretary, Revenue Department.DKS Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Under Secretary, Revenue Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 3. The Collector, Dhamtari 4. Sub-Divisional Officer, Dhamtari, Tah. And Distt. Dhamtari 5. Ramesh Kumar Lahre, Aged about38 years, S/o Shri Ghasi ram Lahre, Patwari, Transfer at Tahsil Nagri, Distt Dhamtari (C.G.) Present: Mr. Ashok Swarnakar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. V.V.S. Murthy, learned Dy. G.A. for the State/respondents No. 1 to 4. WRITPETmON N0,377 QF 2004 PE.TITIONER Ramesh Kumar Lahare, Son of Shri Ghasi Ram Lahar®, Patwari, Posted at P.C. No. 15, Hatkeshar, Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS --^- 114 "•'5' RiSPpNDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh; 2 The Collector, DistrictDhamtari, Chhattisgarh. Present: None appeared for the petitioner. Mr. V.V.S. Murhty, learned Dy. A.G. for the State/respondents. QRALORDER lPassedon30ifiJanuary 2006) The following oral order of the Court was passed by S.R. NAYAK, CJ : These writ petitions arise out of hvo interim orders passed by the State Administrative Tribunal (for short the "SAT") dated 12-1 1-2001 and 09-08-2002 in O.A. No. 1080 of 2001 on the file of SAT, Raipur Bench. In O.A. No. 1080 of 2001, the order dated 16-10-2001 canceiling the eariier transfer order dated 26-06-2001 is assailed. The SAT having regard to the factualcontroversies raised before it, by its order dated 12-11-2001 directed that status-quo that obtained as on 24-10-2001 should be maintainedtill disposal ofO.A. No. 1080 of 2001 and the said ad-interim order was subsequently made absolute and continued till disposal of O.A. No. 1080 of 200, by order dated 09-08-2002. The two interim orders made by the SAT, in the facts and circumstances of the case, cannot be faulted with, particularly, in view of the factual controversies between the parties with regard to the relieve order and assumption of office at the transferred place etc. In that view of the matter, we dismiss all the writ petitions. The original record of O.A. Np. -5- "^v' 1080 of 2001 is received by this Court. Therefore, the Registry is directed to number O.A. No. 1080 of 2001 as writ petition(5) andlist it for final hearing in the second week ofMarch 2006. No costs. ~Y ^ Sd/- OuefJustice Judge Sdf- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge e^te-fr