(1) WP 6786.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6786 OF 2011 Piyush S/o Rajendra Amritkar PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. D.R. Irale Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. ..... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 8TH SEPTEMBER, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent. 2. By way of present Petition, the petitioner has approached this Court with a grievance that though the claim of the petitioner is pending before the respondent no.2-Committee, the respondent no.3- College is likely to cancel the admission of the petitioner on the ground of non-submission of the validity certificate. 3. As to within how much time, the validity certificate should be issued, is not in the hands of (2) WP 6786.2011 the petitioner. Petitioner cannot be faulted with, if there is any delay on account of the respondent no.2-Committee in issuing the validity certificate. 4. Rule is therefore made absolute by allowing the Petition in the following terms:- I) Respondent no.2-Committee shall decide the claim of the petitioner within a period of six months from today. II) Till the decision of the respondent no.2- Committee, no adverse action would be taken against the petitioner. III) In the event the order passed by the respondent no.2-Committee is adverse to the interests of the petitioner, the same shall not be given effect to for a period of four (4) weeks from the receipt of its communication by the petitioner. 5. Authentic copy of this order, be provided to the parties, on their request. [M. T. JOSHI, J.] [B. R. GAVAI, J.] arp/