IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.4084 of 2010 RANDHIR KUMAR @ AJAY KUMAR, S/O DEONANDAN PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR **** /2/ 03.02.2010 Heard both the sides. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 364A, 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Taking into consideration the merits of the case the petitioner was directed to be released on bail by an order, dated 27.11.2009, vide Cr. Misc. No. 41001 of 2009, but, he was required to give an affidavit that he is not an accused in any other case which he could not do since he was accused in one other case in which the petitioner was released on bail considering the merit of the said case vide Annexure 6 I find that the merits of the other case does not interfere with the merits of the present case and, therefore, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Akbarpur P.S. Case No. 32 of 2009 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, on the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how 2 he is related with the petitioner and (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner then his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)