t.^ -^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF TUDICATURE : CG : BILASPUR WRFT APPEAL N0 : \5S) OF 2010 APPELLANT PETITIONER •\T^'\) :^^-^^-I"r <^A..;-"; 9^v' ...•:-^^^--"' *** Rainbharose Joginder aged45yrs s/o Shri Sadhram Workshop Instructor Govt Polytechnic CoUege: Ambikapur Distt-SurgujaCG -VERSUS- The State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary to the Govt. of CG, Tedmical Education Departanent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur CG The Prmcipal Govt. Polytedmic CoUege Ambikapur, Distt- Surguja CG WRITAPPEAL UNDER SECTION 2(1) OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COKRT (APFEAL TO THE DFi?IS!QN_BENCH^ AC^_2M6^ Being aggrieved by the order dated 21-01-2010 passed by the Hon ble Single Bench : Shri Justice S.K.Agruhotri : in Writ-Petition (S) no 1811 of 2010 Fbetween tfae parties : Rainbharose and others -vs- StateofCGand others : ANNEX-AA^ The Appellant/Petitioner respectftdly subniits as under: FACTS OF THE^CASE: 1. The AppeUant/Petitioner is working as workshop Instructor imder the Technical EdTication Department and presendy posted at Govemment Polytechnic CoUege, Ambikapur, Distt-Surguja CG. He has beeri subjectgd to transfer froin the present place of posting to the Govermnent Polytechruc College, Gariyaband vide transfer order ^v^ ^^^ l^ff^ IFI'! iiiil 1 HI<HiCOUICTCU.'.CHHATTO8GAlWATaiLAa^^ O. B: Appellaat: RfispondentA aion'l>le:8hiM.M. ©nfldusl. HbaflxbeSIuijPjrmdiiaattliunai Mtelna, Writ AppealNd.128/2010 RambharoseJoginder. :w,' • -•;::. :.'/ Statepf GIiIiattjsgarhandaBofher ABpearanee; Mr. AIUU^ DayaLShnvastava.ccninsel^ ft& Sun^ AdwQcate, &w \ the State/Tesppnde.nts ba advsmce jGOpy. iigtS: ^itARpealuaderSectliBn¥;2S(^6oft;lie,cai®at:U;8H^ :(A<^al:^;tlM|^i eBenc^a^|t^2CS06;®,:::S'^ :•'':'.': ••..'':':. ' • ' •SWeS.SSiBSEIlER: ..^^^QS.^1<^:.:,','.;:;.:'': ^ : Pcr LM. OUDDU8I. J . Heard. ' : •: : :; . ' ' ' ^ • . :- • 1.^^^ ^ dated 21^4,2010 passedby Ay.I^^Ife.l8M:of2010d4sii^ 2. The brief iacts of the case are that ftie writ appeUaat vras appointed on tlie post of Slalled As^tant oa ten^ basis vide order dated 28.3.1990 by the Pnncipal, iGoverm^nt? Bolyteehn^ Sai:^uja(M.P.,.nc^ChIiattjsgat^inthep%sca^ I225/- wiffie;fii^N?m Q1.04.19W (F.N) uader ^ :ReeruitnleiiP-I3ii^meaii£.fo^^ Seheduled Castes and ^ScIiieduted Tiibes; ThereaBei:,;f]hje; mas^ appo^^ ^ttle :bi%ber po^ a['Wotb^)f^,ifi^^ ''M^. fi 'ss i s^shsaiaaiUte .•ii8*^asy^a^5telffl^tyii s :w Rrincipal, Gowerruneitt Polyteeluuc GoBege on fhc basis ofl recoiniuendations offhe Eiepartm.ental Selection Cpiiunittee in thepayseateofRs. 1200-2040/-. Thfi said adhoc appoiatinent was for a period ofsix inonths and accordir^r, be continued as worksUpp instfuctor qn a^oc basis. TIiereaflfcer, his services were regulanzed oa the post of Workshop InstTUctor vide prder dated 301'1 August, 1993. It is DeceSsary to mention that Iiis regularization was also inade by fBe Principal, Govenunent PDlytechnic CpUege, Amtoikapur. The seniortty list was ateo inaBitained iu respect of aU fhe einployees of Govemment Bolytechnic CoBcge, Amblkapur. TIie said Ust was pubUsbed on 31.12.2005. 'fbKreSe^,tbeposit]^ of the wnt appeUant in service is ttiat he was uutially appouited as SktUed Assistarit and thereafter was selected on tUe Ii^lier post on the basis of recominendation of Departiaeatal Selection Coiamittee and was given appoiatiaeat oa the post of Workshop tostractorand his sernceswere also regularized thercon a^ his seniorily is also inaintamed in Govenuhent Polytechruc College, AiabikapuT. It is aot the case before us that the seiiionty of workstiop instructors is maintamed at State level..' • , , ; .. ..;.;:, .. , . • .' •• : : '• . In the Pundameiital Rules, ''Cadre" Iias "been defiaed as tlie strer^gth of servtee or EL part of sendce sanctibiied as a SepaTate uiut, fhereforc, "appareiit^ the^^^^w^ beloi^s to fhe cadre 6f CtoveriMaent Potytecluuc Gollege, Aiabikapur^ tout he bas , been trans^iTcd vide aapugiied order dated 25th osfApril, 'SOIO ly the State GOveriunent fiwm w ^S^SS^, 't"'y~i°'^ ''%, '^K.i^^ifys',-:. 1 a ^B f AiuMkapur to Qoveriunellt P&lyte^^ CQBege, Gariyaband. K is mrf laiown ^ to wtiere lus seiuiOrity wiU stand ia Ihat local unit that is Goyenunent Potytechiuc CoUBge, Gariyaband and also whjerther further pi^^ the basis of lo<^ seiriortty or there aiy State seniority^ fhe pioinotions are Diade pn llie b^^.of lex^^^s^^ certainly 1aia future chance of getting promotiDU niay be adyersely affected. But we feelthat aUfhe above contentious were not raised by fhe leamed couiisel for the wrtt appellaut before the^learned, siD^le Judge. However, befiire thte Court tie has aniiexefi Abc uitermi Qrder 06 teamed Siugle Juc^e passed iu W^(^ No.1758/^10 filfid Mishia, who is aii cinpteyee ofy^(^ Gariyaband aiui was transferred tp Govei-oinent Engineenng College, BUaspur. He has takeu the plea that he was transferred without tus consent and the State not t)eing the appointiag authority, fhe petitioner cauaot be transferrcd by tbe State Gbveniment fiToiu 1ns present place of postuq; to Govermnent Polytechuic College, Gariyabaml. Tbat case is stiU pendtng and the iD.tenai order whj.ch w^passedon 19.04.2010 is operative. It may be noticed that the petitioaer ofW.P(S) No. 1758/2010 nam.ely Satyahaaa Mislu-a has also beea traiMferred by the same order by whteh fhe itistant writ appeBant has beeh teansferred, In fact, as Hiany as 10 persoDswere transferred by the ini|wgned order^^^^^^^ ineludmg Sal^alrain Mishra and the iastaiit'wrtt appeBaUt. TfaOughjllie petitioii^E' has not tafcen^:the ^a befiare fhe learaed su^glc judge and ^a£WBI' 1 ^ ^ '•^•*.-^rf^' '^i'- has talfien in the wat appeal but we feel fhat^once a similar pefitkai is pendlng befiwe ftie leamed Su^le Judge, his wiit petitiOH be alsb deeided analogously. Therefi:>re, we reiaitfhe matter back to the leamed Smgle Judge. W.P(^. Not 1811/2010 filed bythewrit appellant shaUbe coaiiected' withW.P(^.No. 1758/2010 and shall be listed befbre the Smgle Judge toiaorrow i.e., 06.5.2010 for analogous lieanr^. 6. The benefit of the iaterim order graated to petitioner Salyakam Mishra ia W.P(S). 1758/2010 sliould also be niade available to tbe writ appeUaiit fhat is the status quo as on today shaUbe inaiutained. 7. The impug^dorder p^sed by the l^tnfid sir^lejudge on 21.04,2010staadsiiteigedwitbttije above order; 8. With tbe afi^said direction, this writ appeal is disposed of No order as to cost. Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge I"d"°^-rM*. Rad