1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Third Bail Application No. 10185/2010 Jagdish Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 11.11.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr SK Jain - for the petitioner Mr Laxman Meena, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that statement of Komal has been recorded. So far as petitioner is concerned there exist no direct allegations against him for involving him in the dacoity. The only allegation is that he brought motor cycle on which other accused ran away though he was not on the spot of dacoity. The main allegation exists against other accused who are behind bars. Since trial is likely to take time, petitioner is not directly involved in the matter yet he is behind bars for last more than 15 months, hence, he may be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 2 After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, bail application is accepted and it is directed that accused-petitioner namely; Jagdish may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 138/2009 registered at Police Station – Kishanganj, Baran for offence under Section/s 395, 412 and 120-B IPC provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma