IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.16678 of 2011 Date of Decision.19.09.2011 Mr. Napper Ned O'Connor Tandy son of Mr. Mark Napper O' Connor Tandy, resident of 178, Kensington Park Road, London W11 2ER (U.K.) at present residing in Taj Hotel, Sector 17, Chandigarh .....Petitioner Versus State, Union Territory, Chandigarh through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs and Justice, U.T. Civil Secretariat, Sector 9, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. R.S. Cheema, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sartaj Singh Narula, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arjun Shukla, Advocate for Mr. Sanjay Kaushal, Sr. Standing Counsel for U.T. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner produced before me a copy of the order passed by the Judge, Special Court, Chandigarh allowing the petitioner to go back to join the academic course with an undertaking to appear in Court on 17.11.2011. 2. I do not find that any further directions are necessary. The writ petition is disposed of taking on record the order passed by the Judge, Special Court, Chandigarh on 14.09.2011. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 19, 2011 Pankaj*