IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 21ST FEBRUARY 2008 / 2ND PHALGUNA 1929 W.P.(C).No. 5032 of 2008 (Y) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------- C.VIJAYAN,CHENNATHODIYIL HOUSE EDAYOOR NORTH P.O., VALANCHERRY MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.ARIKKAT VIJAYAN MENON SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, (WORKS CONTRACT & LUXURY TAX) MALAPPURAM. 2. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR) TALUK OFFICE, TIRUR. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, EDAYUR VILLAGE MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. C.K. GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P. (C) No. 5032 OF 2008 - Y = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 21st February, 2008 J U D G M E N T In this writ petition all that I am concerned is the challenge against Ext. P7 in so far as certain remittances made by the petitioner for which Ext. P5 certificate has been issued by the 3rd respondent are allegedly declined to be given credit. The justification offered by the respondents is that the petitioner should have produced a treasury receipt and not a certificate from the Village Officer. Going by the provisions of the Act, the respondents cannot be faulted for the stand that they have taken. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing that if the petitioner produces a certificate issued by the treasury concerned, the same will be taken into account and the proceedings leading to Ext. P7 will be reconsidered. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-