IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30725 of 2010 KAMLESH YADAV, S/O BISHWANATH YADAV, R/O, VILL- TIYAR, P.S. TIYAR, DISTT- BHOJPUR …….Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 4 11.10.2010 Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Shayam Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, who is in custody in Sessions Trial No. 46 of 2009/ 165 of 2010 arising out of Tiyar P.S. Case No. 16 of 2003 for the offence under Sections 341, 342, 323 and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act, has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in this case out of ten witnesses, nine witnesses have already been examined which have not supported the prosecution case. It has been submitted that only Investigating Officer has been left to be examined. It has been submitted that all the witnesses have turned hostile and as such the petitioner may be granted bail. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. Keeping in view the fact that the trial is at the fag end, it would not be proper to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected. Bhardwaj ( Rakesh Kumar, J.) 2