IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2548 of 2011. Decided on: 27th April, 2011. Meena Kumari. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG, for respondents No.1 to 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “(A) That the impugned action of the respondents in not paying the grants-in-aid already released and not releasing the grants-in-aid for the remaining period i.e. March, 2008 till date may kindly be quashed and set aside. (B) That the writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction may kindly be issued directing the respondents to release the grants- in-aid 1.4.2008 onwards till date along with interest @ 9%.” 2. It is for the petitioner to bring her grievance before the first respondent, in which case the first respondent will get an opportunity to look into the matter and to take appropriate action in accordance with law, justice and equity. The petitioner may file an appropriate representation 2 before the first respondent within a period of two weeks from today. The first respondent will look into the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law, justice and equity without discriminating the petitioner within another period of three months. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition while submitting the representation before the first respondent. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 27th April, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr) Judge.