IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4768 of 2011 RAMADHAR PASWAN & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 23.03.2011 Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 364, 201, 120B of the I.P.C. It is alleged against the petitioners that complainant’s son Pinku Kumar went into the company of the petitioners to Delhi to earn livelihood but he could not return till October, 2009 then the present case was lodged. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the complainant himself admitted in para 4 of the complaint that there was land dispute between the parties and the enquiry witness, the brother of the victim in para 5 of his evidence has admitted that earlier also the victim went to Delhi alone. It is further submitted that there is nothing on record to suggest that actually the victim went in the company of the petitioners. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners namely 1. Ramadhar Paswan 2. Kamal Paswan, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond 2 of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in Complaint Case No. 1005 of 2009, Trial No. 2634 of 2010. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)