IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-34683 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 03, 2011 Ajaib Singh and another. …Petitioners Versus State of Punjab. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, Addl. A.G., Punjab, for the respondent-State. Mr. Binderjit Singh, Advocate, for the complainant. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 50, dated 12.09.2010, under Sections 498-A, 406/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Guru Nanak Dev Thermal Plant, Bathinda. Learned counsel for the complainant has vehemently opposed the bail application, stated that the CRM M-34683 of 2010 petitioners have treated the complainant with cruelty and have demanded a big diesel car. Learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, on the instructions of ASI Kashmir Singh, who is present in person, has stated that dowry articles have already been recovered from the petitioners and they have joined investigation. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. Order dated 26.11.2010 is made absolute, subject to the limitations provided under Section 438(2) of the Code. Petitioners-accused shall participate in the investigation as and when they are required. February 03, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2