1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5084 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.5084 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.5084 OF 2004 Priyanka Omprakash Panwar ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents ----- Mr.R.K. Mendadkar for Petitioner Mr.C.R.Sonawane, A.G.P. for Respondents CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. DATE: 7TH MARCH, 2005. DATE: 7TH MARCH, 2005. DATE: 7TH MARCH, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Admittedly State of origin of the Petitioner’s father is from the State of Madhya Pradesh. That being so the Petitioner will be entitled to reservation in the State of Madhya Pradesh and not in the State of Maharashtra. This was one of the ground on which the Caste Scrutiny Committee had rejected the contention of the Petitioner. We do not find any error of law apparent on the face of record in so far as that finding is concerned. . Learned Counsel then points out that the Petitioner is doing third year of the M.B.B.S and places reliance on the judgment of the Apex Court in the State of Maharashtra Vs. Milind, 2001 (1) Supreme Court Cases. It will be open to the 2 Respondent Management if they can adjust the Petitioner to do so. . With the above the Petition stands disposed of. The State to consider and dispose of any representation made by the Petitioner if made within two weeks from today. (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.)