$3§g$i§ gmw / £ wg1xa§’/ L~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (S) No. LN ofx OF 2010. PETITIONERS / :1. Sanjay Kumar Banchhore, S/o. late Shri Ram Swaroop Banchhore, aged about 29 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade— III, Post Bana, Tahsil Arang, District Raipur (C.G.) /' 2.- Fatte 1al Kanouje, S/o. late Shri Ubhe Ram Kanouje, aged about 3O years, Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, Primary School Kaudiya, Block Palari, District Raipur (C. G.) Balram Chandrakar, S/o. late Shri Jagdish Chandrakar, aged about 29 yearS, Shiksha Karmi Grade— III, Primary ‘School Sindhora, Block Palari, District Raipur (c. G.) ’ / y /4. Laxmi Chandra Kanouje, S/o. late Shri Banshi Lal Kanouje, aged about 3O years, Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, Primary School Kaudiya, Block Palari, " District Raipur (C. G.) 4l”. k. VERSUS RESPONDENTS /£1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of General Admiistatio Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bawan, Raipu (C. G.) 2. The Secretary, School Education / Departme, Manalaya, Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) - 3. The Colleor, ct Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) . ~istrict Education officer, Raipur, Disttict Raiur (C. G.) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad anchayat, Palai, Distrct Raipur (C.G.) nrn h r nt tr /’4 D p P r i WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 4') §wf§gx1mc 78 FaW, Wm, W mmwr’g/Ww‘gL/Qoo mm (WEI) WWW ammwam‘ mum‘3fsém avaifwm an: Han’hle sin: Manindra mum shuuastava, J. -- 11.8.2010 mmm Vv am waxd of’Assis’tant Teachers, who’dicd while in service. They movad ‘ an applicaiion for compassionato appointment and theyr have been - given appointment on th petitioncxs submitted that Assistant Teachers acconiing the policyu v ~ Learned State's counsel submitted that for the present, the opportunity of mmg the detailed ‘ I mpmsentaticn before the com tent respondent authorityE~f¢hinhmay - be considexed on its own men' , in awordance mthlmw v 'representau‘m ’mising th “respondent authority aiong within six weeks ‘n-om today, t of Shiksha Karmi Grade Ill. The ‘ y axe entitled to \be appointed as H: petitioners may be given hout expressing any opinion on the on of this Court, ends of jlistice will be Having consixiered 'anci' merits‘of the case, in the o solved, 1f awdimction is gv t to the petitioners to make a deemed 4 gievances before“ the competent, a copy of the petition andithis’oxder, * d on such repmsentation heing med; j P the, competent respondent an ority shall decide the same on its own Vi .l c p e c‘ s e J ' ' 't M13. Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitioners. Mir. Sangeeta Mishm, Panei Lawyer forrthe Stats, on advance. copy. Heald on admission: The‘petitioners have-Eci this petiiion on the gmnnd that they XI-HC—7 8 Wm m‘zoo afar W, Wm,m mm (Wu) WWW WWW mmm P2? WWW§WW Quifwm merits, in accordance with law, period of four months from tht any gn'cvance su'll remains, Jthe petitionnrs may avail tbs ramedy available under the law. ‘ With'the afomsaid observation, this petition smnds disposed o§. ‘ Certmed copy as per wk . Sdh Manindra Ma as early as possibls,rpmferably Within a_ ff : date of mceipt of the mpxesenmtion‘.‘ If. ha” ShrivastaVa {1.94 Judge .