1 ao420 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.420 OF 2011 Gautam D. Patel & Ors. ...Appellants vs. R.S.Developers & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Anil Singh i/b Mr.D.R.Shah for the appellants Mr.R.K.Agarwal for the respondent no.1 Mr.G.S.Godbole for respondent no.3 Mr.Sanjay Udayabhau for respondent no.2 CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : APRIL 11,2011 P.C.: 1 Not on board. Taken up for hearing. Heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as learned counsel for first respondent, second respondent and third respondent. By the impugned order dated 29th March 2011, the learned trial Judge has declined to grant ad-interim relief to the appellant plaintiff. The relevant part of the order reads thus : Copy be supplied. Delay would not defeat the purpose of filing of the suit. It is necessary to hear the defendants, at length. Hence, the order below : ORDER Leave to register the N/m granted. Prayer for ad-interim relief rejected. Adjd. For hearing N/m to 12.4.2011 and reply of deft.no.1 and 2. 2 ao420 2 Thus, there is no reason assigned for not granting ad-interim relief. It is true that it was not necessary to record detailed reasons. But surely, brief reasons ought to have been indicated for not granting ad-interim relief. 3 Only on the aforesaid ground, impugned order deserves to be set aside. 4 Accordingly, order dated 29th March 2011 is set aside and the learned trial Judge is directed to consider the prayer for ad-interim relief made by the appellants afresh on its own merits. Prayer for ad- interim relief shall be decided afresh without being influenced by the impugned order and this order setting aside the impugned order. JUDGE