1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1462 OF 2010 1. Hanuman S/o.Taklya Kale, Age-45 years, Occu-Labour, R/o.Jawala Panchal, Tal.Basmat, Dist. Hingoli 2. Kathalu @ Cigret S/o.Sahebrao Pawar, Age-40 years, Occu-Labourer, R/o. As above APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra, Through the Police Inspector, Police Station Hingoli (Town) Tal. and Dist. Hingoli RESPONDENT Mr.V.G.Sakolkar, learned counsel for applicants. Mrs.V.A.Shinde, learned APP for State CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J. DATE : 25/06/2010 PER COURT : 1. By the present application, the applicants have approached this Court for their release on bail in connection with CR No. 121/2009, registered in Hingoli (Town) Police Station. 2. Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned APP for State. Perused the papers of investigation till carried out. 2 3. It appears that the said crime came to be registered on the basis of complaint lodged by one Rameshchandra Bagdia r/o. MIDC area, that some 8 persons forcibly entered at his residential premises in the night hours and robbed the cash in the sum of Rs.1,93,000/- and the golden silver ornaments worth Rs.8,75,000/- of which detailed description is given in the complaint itself. It appears that in connection with this offence, these applicants and 8 other persons came to be arrested on 19/11/2009, wherein after completion of investigation, charge sheet came to be filed on 09/02/2010. Incriminating evidence against first applicant is that in the TI parade, he was identified by the inmates in the house of complainant and 2 silver bricks, one kg each, were recovered from him during investigation. So far as applicant no.2 is concerned, nothing is on recovered at his instance, nor he was identified in the TI parade. During the course of submissions across the bar, learned APP placed in my hand the communication received to him from P.I. Hingoli, showing the criminal antecedents against the first applicant, which are 7 in number and registered u/s. 395 of The IPC, in which he was acquitted in 3 cases, and still 4 cases are pending against him. So far as the second applicant is concerned, there are no criminal antecedents at his credit. In view of this, following is the order : O R D E R 1. Application is partly allowed. 2. Application of applicant no.1 Hanuman Kale is hereby rejected. 3. Applicant no.2 be released on bail on furnishing solvent surety 3 in the sum of Rs.20,000/- and on executing PR bond in the like amount. 4. After released on bail, applicant no.2 to give attendance to Hingoli Town Police Station on every Monday in between 11.00 a.m. to 3.00 p.m. till the trial against him will finally stands disposed of. 5. Application stands disposed of accordingly. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/JUNE 2010/cri.appl.1462-10