THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.NO.240 OF 2009 ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against the docket order dated 28-11-2008 in I.A.No.576 of 2008 in I.A.No.389 of 2008 in O.S.No.38 of 2002, on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Pakala, Chittoor District, wherein the said application filed by the defendant, seeking adjournment by one week, was dismissed. Heard both the sides. Perused the records. The respondent/plaintiff filed the suit against the defendant for recovery of money based on a pronote. The petitioner/defendant filed written statement contending inter alia that the suit pronote is forged and fabricated. The defendant filed IA No.389 of 2008 under Section 45 of the Evidence Act to send the suit document to the handwriting expert and the said petition was allowed. The handwriting expert returned the papers for want of admitted signatures of contemporaneous period. The defendant sought a week’s time for furnishing the documents containing the admitted signatures stating that the admitted signatures pertaining to the year 1997 to 1999 were available in the Railway Employees Co-op Credit Society Bank, South Central Railway at Chennai, where she obtained loan from the said Bank during the relevant period. The trial Court, by the impugned order, dismissed the said application on the ground that the suit is of the year 2002 and the defendant has not produced the admitted signatures as required by the handwriting expert. Expressing sympathy with the plight of the plaintiff, the petition filed by the defendant seeking adjournment by one week was dismissed as more than two years has elapsed since the dismissal of the petition for adjournment filed by the defendant. Refusal to grant adjournment of one week has resulted further delay of the disposal of the suit by another two years. Be that as it may, having regard to the fact that the petition filed by the defendant under Section 45 of the Evidence Act having been allowed by the trial Court and the document was sent to the handwriting expert, it is considered just and proper that an opportunity be given to the defendant to produce the documents containing the admitted signatures of contemporaneous period as desired by the hand-writing expert. In that view of the matter, the impugned order is set side and the defendant is granted two weeks time from today to produce the documents containing admitted signatures, failing which, the trial Court is at liberty to proceed further with the matter and the defendants right to send the suit document to the expert shall stand forfeited and the trial Court is at liberty to proceed further with the matter. The civil revision petition is disposed of accordingly. _____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY,J Rkk Dated: 15-2-2011