1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15988 of 2011 MURUGAN ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE, REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SANARPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, CR.NO. 620/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. D.SELVARAJ Advocate For Respondent :MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is the sole accused and he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 10.10.2011 for the alleged commission of offences under Sections 498 and 306 I.P.C., in Crime No.620 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2.Heard Mr.D.Selvaraj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is the husband and who is suspected of abetting the commission of suicide by his wife because of his illegal intimacy with his sister-in-law. He would further submit that the petitioner was incarceration right from 10.10.2011 and the investigation is still pending and hence, he prays for bail. 4.The learned Government Advocate would submit in his argument that the reason for commission of suicide is continuance of illicit intimacy with the sister-in-law of the petitioner which could not be digested by the deceased person, she committed suicide. He would further submit that the investigation is pending and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, stringent condition may be imposed for the secured presence of the petitioner. 5.Considering the submission made on both sides, I could see that the petitioner is suspected for abetting the commission of suicide by his wife because of his illegal intimacy with his sister-in-law and the investigation is still pending and the petitioner is in judicial custody https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 fro more than 65 days, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail on the following conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul and on further condition that the petitioner should appear before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. sd/- 15/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III DINDIGUL. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL. 3. INSPECTOR OF POLICE SANARPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 4. THE OFFICER IN-CHARGE, DISTRICT JAIL, DINDIGUL. 5. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. D.SELVARAJ Advocate SR.No.43877 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15988 of 2011 Date :15/12/2011 RJ/16.12.11 2p/7c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/