IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1474 of 2011 Km. Preeti Pant and two others. … Petitioners. Versus Uttarakhand Board of School Education, Ramnagar, Nainital, through its Secretary. … Respondent. Mr. Aharar Baig, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate, in brief of Mrs. Seema Sah, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent. Date July 19, 2011. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to produce answer sheet of History subject of the petitioners of Intermediate Examination 2011. According to the petitioners, they appeared in the Intermediate Examination of 2011 conducted by the respondent- Board with the details given by them in paragraph no.4 of the memo of writ petition but they have been declared unsuccessful in the examination. Having heard the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, I am of the view that since there is no provision of re-evaluation of the answer sheets under the Education Act, the prayer of the petitioners cannot be accepted for re-evauation. However, if the petitioners had already applied for scrutiny of the paper within the time prescribed along with requisite fee after completing necessary formalities therefor, the scrutiny shall be made by the respondent expeditiously, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S.Verma, J.) RCP