: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.109 OF 2008 IN L.C.SUIT NO.4551 OF 2006 Anantrai N. Raval ....Petitioner V/s. M/s.Sheth Builders Pvt.Ltd. & Ors. ....Respondents Mrs.Divya Trivedi for the Petitioner. Ms.A.V. Khanolkar for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.S.V. More, AGP for Respondent No.3. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 3RD APRIL, 2008. P.C. : 1. There does not appear to have been an intention to disobey the order. There appears to have been a genuine misapprehension in the mind of the Respondents regarding their liability to comply with all the terms and conditions till the disposal of the criminal case. 2. However, it is now made clear that the pendency of Criminal Case No.388/SS of 2005 does not entitle the Respondents not to comply with all the terms including execution of the agreement and registration thereof as well as the payment of stamp : 2 : duty and registration charges. The Respondents shall do so in any event within eight weeks from today. On this position being pointed out, the Respondents have fairly stated that they would comply with all their obligations under the consent terms irrespective of the pendency of the said criminal case. 3. However, it is desirable that the said criminal case is disposed of by the learned Magistrate as expeditiously as possible. Mrs.Trivedi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner undertakes to immediately make a fresh application to the concerned Court for taking up the said criminal case No.388/SS of 2005. The learned advocate undertakes not to seek any adjournment before the Court in the said criminal case. The learned advocate further undertakes to withdraw the same if permissible in law. She further states that the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding further in the matter. It is however for the learned Judge to pass appropriate orders. 4. With the aforesaid clarification, the Contempt Petition is accordingly disposed of.