WPMS No.1988 of 2008 H on ’ble B.S.Ver m a ,J Ms. Suman Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Dinesh Gehtori, learned Standing Counsel for the State/ respondent nos.1 to 3. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel for respondent no.4. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought writ in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the police administration for not interfering in the business of the petitioners. In writ jurisdiction, the disputed question of facts cannot be scrutinized. Apart from that, the petitioners have an alternative remedy to file a civil suit if the cause of action survives and the petitioners are advised so. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy available to the petitioners. (B.S. Ver m a , J ) 18.11.2010 RG