IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2630 of 2006 Ram Paras Rai & Ors Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 3 18.08.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the University. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the order dated 28.07.1999 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 6655 of 1998 has not been complied with. Learned counsel for the University submits that on perusal of the aforesaid order it appears that there is no specific direction on the prayer of the petitioner for his regularization in service. However, the Court observed that in case petitioner files a representation the same be considered and disposed of. He further submits that as the contempt application has been filed after long delay, and as such, it does not deserves to be entertained. Considering the submissions of the parties, it is directed that in case any order has been passed pursuant to the aforesaid order dated 28.07.1999 the same may be communicated to the petitioner, and in case no decision has been taken, the authority concerned may consider the representation of the petitioner and dispose of the same in accordance with law in the light of the aforesaid order dated 28.07.1999. It will be open for the petitioner to file fresh representation, if so advised. The application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)