t/v IN THE HON'BLEHLGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR s- -" * M.C.C. No. <S S'3 /2010 c. ^' APPUCANTS U^' M/s. Rajkumar and Brothers, PEtlTIONERS _^V<°'.... through: its Proprietor Rajkumar S^--.i"}y72tn- Tiwari' s/o- Tribhuwan Prasad Tiwari, aged about 43 years, R/o. Sanjay Bazar, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) ^3-'"" t A^" .^ { ^•l°i'° ^--'s^^ RES^ONDENTS 2]/ M/s. Dharamchandra Devendra Kumar Jain, through its Proprietor, Atul Kumar Jain, S/o. Devendra Kumar Jain, aged about 46 years, R/o. Gole Bazar, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Home and Jail Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Director General of Jail, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Inspector General of Jail, Raipur, DistrictRaipur (C.G.) Superintendent of Jail, Central Jail, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) APPLICATION FORRESTORATION OF WMT PETITION (C) ~..^:'. 5348/2010 / v .- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Coram: ApBlicants. Petitioners. Hon' ble Shri Dhirendra NIishra, & Hon' ble ShriR.N.Chandrakar, JJ M.C.C. No. 683 of 2010 1) M/s. Rajkumar and Brothers through its Proprietor Rajkumar Tiwari, s/o. Tribhuwan Prasad Tiwari, aged about 43 years, r/o. Sanjay Bazar, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG). 2) M/s. Dharamchandra Devendra Kumar Jain, through its Proprieto, Atul Kumar Jain, aged about 46 years, r/o. Gole Bazar, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG). Vs. 1) State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Home and Jail Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). 2) Director General of Jail, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). 3) Inspector General of Jail, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). 4) Superintendent of Jail, Central Jail, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG). (Application for restoration of Writ Petition (C) No. 5348 of 2010) Respondents Present: Shri Vikram Dixit, counsel for the applicants. Shri U.N.S. Deo, Govt. Advocate forthe State. OralOrder (Passed on this 3rd day of December,2010) Per Dhirendra Mish_ra, J. Heard. The applicants have filed this application for restoration of Writ Petition (C) No.5348 of 2010 which was dismissed by this court vide order dated 25- 11-2010forwantofprosecution. Learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection if the writ appeal is restored to its originalnumber. \3 € -2. On due consideration of the reasons assigned in the application which is also supported by affidavit of the applicant No.1, we are satisfied that the applicants have been able to show sufficient cause for non-appearance of the counsel for the petitioners on 25-1 1-2010. Accordingly, the application is allowed and writ petition is directed to be restored to its original number, subject to applicants' depositing Rs.500/- to the High Court Legal Aid Committee, Bilaspur, within a period of two weeks from today and thereafter on furnishing the receipt thereof Writ Petition (C) No. 5348 of 2010 be listed for hearing. s. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Sdf- R.N. Chandrakar Judge Raju