IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 11794 of 2000 Between: 1 E. Narayana S/o.Kondanna R/o.Yenugonda Village, Mahabubnagar Mandal, Mahabubnagar District and others. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Joint Collector, Mahabubnagar, Mahabubnagar District and others. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:Sri N. Naveen Kumar for Sri S.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 to 7: None Counsel for the Respondent Nos.8 to 14: Sri K. Mahipathi Rao CVNR,J W.P. NO.11794 OF 2000 The Court made the following Order: This writ petition is ﬁled for a Writ of Certiorari to quash the order dated 29.5.2000 passed by Respondent No.1, whereby he conﬁrmed the order dated 19.6.1993 passed by Respondent No.2. Heard Sri N. Naveen Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for Respondents 1 and 2 and Sri K. Mahipathi Rao, learned counsel for Respondents 8 to 14. For the purpose of disposal of this writ petition, it is not necessary to refer to the genealogy and the complex facts involved in the case, because it is represented by the learned counsel for both the parties that the Civil Suits, namely, O.S. Nos. 71 of 1990 on the ﬁle of the Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar ﬁled by the petitioners and O.S. No. 55 of 1996 ﬁled by Respondents 3 and 4 in the same Court are at the advanced stage of hearing. It is also admitted that the issues relating to the validity of the documents in question and title to the properties covered by the said documents are subject matter of the said Civil Suits. In view of these admitted facts, it is agreed by the learned counsel for both the parties that the Civil Court may proceed with the pending Civil Suits on the basis of the evidence available on record without taking into consideration any ﬁndings and observations contained in orders dated 19.6.1993 and 29.5.2000 of Respondents 2 and 1 respectively. In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of without going into the merits of the case with the direction to the learned Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar to dispose of the above mentioned two Suits without reference to the aforementioned orders and the findings contained therein. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P. No.15012 of 2000 ﬁled by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY,J DATE: 22nd October, 2008 Note: Copy to be sent to the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar. B/o pnb