IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33495 of 2010 1.PANKAJ RAI 2.RAJAN KUMAR ALIAS RANJAN KUMAR 3.NAND LAL RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 5.10.2010. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Malsalami P.S.Case No.116 of 2010 for the offence punishable under Section 365 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation as set out in the First Information Report against the petitioners is of kidnapping the minor son of the informant with intention to marry with the sister of the petitioner no.3. The learned counsel for the petitioners, with reference to the petition of compromise filed on behalf of the informant, submits that the parties are in agreement that the present case was instituted in confusion and that the same has since been resolved and that the informant does not wish to proceed with the matter. He thus submits that the said petitions placed at Annexures-2 and 2/A of the bail 2 application are relevant for consideration of the prayer made on behalf of the petitioners. Taking into consideration the circumstances and submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners, let the petitioners (1) Pankaj Rai, (2) Rajan Kumar alias Ranjan Kumar and (3) Nand Lal Rai, in the event of their arrest/surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on their individually furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in connection with Malsalami P.S.Case No.116 of 2010 subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J)