IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3324 of 2010 MUNESHWAR SAFI @ MUNIS SAFI Versus NAGENDRA PANDEY & ORS. ----------- For the petitioner : M/s Yogesh Chandra Verma, Sr. Advocate and Ashok Kumar Kashyap, Advocate ------- 2 12.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defects as pointed out by the office in course of the day. This application has been filed for restoration of Second Appeal No. 187 of 2010, which stood dismissed for part compliance of order dated 19.7.2010, as defect no. 5 pointed out by the office could not be removed within the time granted. On being satisfied with the sufficiency of reasons mentioned in paragraph no. 5 to 7 of this application for omission on part of the petitioner, this application is allowed and Second Appeal No. 187 of 2010 is restored to its original file and number, if the defect no. 5 as pointed out by the office is removed by tomorrow (13.8.2010). If the aforesaid defect is removed by 2 tomorrow, let the I.A. No. 5823 of 2010 be listed under the heading “For Orders on Petition” on 16.8.2010 along with the defects, if any, in the aforesaid interlocutory application. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)