IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 1347of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.3.2009 Jagjit Kaur ....Petitioner Versus Surinder Pal and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. B.D. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL J **** The challenge in the present petition is to the order dated January 28, 2009, passed by the learned Court below whereby on account of death of the plaintiff Kewal Krishan in the suit, Mohinder Pal, Surinder Pal and Geeta sons and daughter of Kewal Krishan have been brought on record as his LRs. Learned counsel for the petitioner/defendant submitted that on the material produced on record by them it has been prima-facie proved that Mohinder Pal and Surinder Pal are sons of Muni Lal whereas Geeta is the only daughter of Kewal Krishan and on account of bringing on record Mohinder Pal and Surinder Pal to represent deceased-Kewal Krishan prejudice has been caused to the petitioner/defendant as now she will have to contest the case against the persons who are not entitled to inherit the property of the deceased/plaintiff in the suit. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any merit in the submission made. LRs have been brought on record only to represent the deceased-plaintiff in the suit. It is not disputed that Geeta one of the LR who has been brought on record is daughter of Kewal Krishan. Once that is so even Geeta singly also could contest the claim made by her deceased father against the petitioner/defendant. If she has any grouse against the other two persons claiming themselves to be sons of deceased Kewal Krishan the same is a dispute between them, inter-se. The petitioner/defendant is not effected by that. Dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 10.3.2009 JUDGE Reema