IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 4024/2010 Decided on:9.9.2010. Chain Ram. ...Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. ... Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. S.C. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. Justice Rajiv Sharma,J. (oral) Petitioner claims that though he was appointed as Pipe Lineman in the respondent-Department in the year 1984, however, he had been discharging the duties of Fitter Grade-I. However, he has been regularized as Plumber Lineman on 18.1.1995. Petitioner has not made any representation seeking regularization as Fitter Grade-I instead of Plumber Lineman. In the interest of justice petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the Secretary (I&PH) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh for the redressal of his grievance within a Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? 2 period of four weeks from today. Thereafter the Secretary (I&PH) shall consider the same in view of law laid down by this Court in Gauri Dutt and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh reported in Latest HLJ 2008 (HP) 366 and Mool Raj Upadhaya versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others, reported in 1994 Supp (2) SCC 316 within a period of two months after the receipt of representation alongwith copy of this judgment. In the light of above, the petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma) Judge. 9.9.2010. *awasthi*