IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.615 of 2008 Nirma Kumari, wife of Sri Vijay Kumar Singh, resident of village Dhobwal, P.O. Dhobwal via Jalalpur Bazar, P.S. Khaira, District- Saran ………… Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through Secretary, Primary and Adult Education, Human Resources Development Department, New Secretariat, Patna 2.The Director, Primary Education, New Secretariat, Patna 3.The Commissioner, Saran Division, Chapra 4.The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra 5.The District Superintendent of Education, Saran at Chapra 6.The Block Development Officer, Parsa Block, At & P.O. & P.S. Parsa, District- Saran 7.The Block Education Extension Officer, Parsa Block, At & P.O. & P.S. Parsa, District- Saran 8.The Gram Panchayat Raj, Bheldi, through its Mukhia 9.The Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Raj Bheldi, At & P.O. & P.S. Bheldi, District- Saran 10.Mamta Kumari, wife of Sri Anil Kumar, resident of village Bariyarpur, P.O. Bheldi, P.S. Bheldi, District- Saran 11.Chandrawati Devi, wife of Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, resident of village Yadavpur, P.O. Bheldi, P.S. Bheldi, District- Saran ………… Respondents. ----------- 2. 30/08/2010 Learned counsels agree that the Appellate Authorities constituted by the State Government under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Prarambhik Shikshak (Niyojan Avam Seva Sart) Niyamvali, 2006 (as amended by Amendment Act, 2008) are now functional and hence an efficacious alternative forums is available to the petitioner and others for consideration of all their grievances in respect of their employment. 2 In the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate appeal before the concerned Appellate Authority, if not already filed, for redressal of her grievances. In case such an application is filed by the petitioner within one month, the Appellate Authority shall consider the same and all documents enclosed therewith, including orders of this Court in identical matters, if produced, and other relevant records and make all endeavours to dispose of the same on merits after hearing the parties concerned by a speaking order, preferably within the time prescribed under the Rules for the purpose, without going into the question of limitation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioner. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)