'3TCT:?!IPIRTT, ^fli'y'iw, '[iiwitiy aii^iwRt-ii* WSI StI^T *Ni«t> sn^T 1HT (•j°iq«!<i4) ig^ltW 4ri^d 3n^?T (Sinale Bench: Hon'bte Md WritPetition !s] No.611/2009 (Petition under Art.226) PETTnONER Vipin Bil^ years, Fjange Assistant, Jainagar, Forest Range, Surajpuij Versus RESPONDENTS 1. S-tate of] uepartm^nT, o.f..^. Bnawan, kaipur, uisTnct Kaipur f/*&\ {i,i9) 2. Chief Cor] /^A^ (£6). 3. Oivisional Surguja. 4. Sub-Divy Surguja ( 6. Umashant Assistan-t (C.6.) 31.1.2009 Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Adv. f Ms. Sunita Jain, P.L. for thi Heard. °bwld<il-iiWfi!4'te^ <fa«{i< ^siRnan^i justice^ Ohirendra Mjshra) of Constitution of India) ari Singh, S/o M.M. Singh, aged about 55 , District Surguja (C.6.) Chhattisgoffh. through: Secretary. Forest ** <* *»• |servator of Forest. Raipur. Oistrict Raipur Forest Officer, Forest C>ivision, South Wmbikapur, District Surguja (C6). ;i'onal Forest Officer, Surajpur, District ^G). 5. Forest Rpnge Officer, Surajpur, District Surguja (ce). tor Pondey, S/o Late Siri Bhcxgwat Pandey, aged abput oy years, OepuTy Kange (.Kange , Jainagar), R/o Jainagar, SSistrict Surguja 'or the petitioner. ^ State. ^mT^r ^^p? n,?^^^^r»~<m?— E-'S/95—11/2008—1.00.000. ,„<• .,'*'i ••a- 3tl^I^lfy»W 'SW ^i^ti 8ttiW -3~^ ^ltqi<-1*l, afl1*i'iiS, fat?tt-Uy ^IIICTI tltlKft "^. 200 3il^TTPiq?<^^SR^) ^^iN? <M^a •an^i 2-' Srievance of the petiti<^ier m this petition is that vide transfer order dated 7.7.2008 [Annexure P-3) the petitioner, who was posted as Officer on Specjial Duty, Forest Division Surajpur, South Sarguja; was tninsferr^d as Ronge Assistant, Jainagar Circle, Forest Ranoe Surajpur, respondentNo.3-&ivisional Fore South Surguja at the option of ^t Officer and in compliance of the respondent No.6, though the submits that if the petitionerj resoondent No.l herein within 4 ^tprffl-lftl tlFRif'^ 1^s^ <F^^$i< ^ ^Iwi 1d»n^ said order the petitioner has jo|ned at the said place on 29.9.2008. Wherais; respondent No.6, vMp wos earlier posted at Jainagar, South Sarguja was also tnmsfei^red to North Sur9uja vtde order of Annexure P-2 dated 7.7.208. Ijlowever, on the representation of respondent No.6, his tronsfer order of Annexure P-2 has been cancelled and because of cancel^ation of transfer order, respondent No.5 herein is compelling the p4titioner to handover Itie charge to •e is no corresponding order of transfer of thepetitioner fr^m Jainagar Ranae to some o-ther place. Learned Panel Lawyer oi^pearina for the respondent/State files fresh representation before Beriod of ten days froni todoy for redressal of his-arievance raiseld in this petition, -the same shall be considered by •the said authority within a further period of three^ ?;-K+^T ^P? g^TT^q^a^iH?—E..-S/95—11 /2008—1,00,000. •I WkII, 'S^ •<11<11<1<4, ®Tll-y''i6,fadW^-!. w^iv h'n'fi ^T -ailfl^i ^>4Nt A w^ti ^* (^^^«r) TOmiTflftnsn^r ^y- weeks' from the date of receip with law after affording oppor-tu^iity of hearing to the petitioner as well as re^ondent No.6. In yiew of the aboye subihission of tearned counsel for the oarties, the instant oetition is petitioner to make fresh repre^entation before respondent No.l alonq with this oetition and cert) days from today for redressalj oetition. On such reoresentatiol directed to consider and decid4 weeks' from •the date of receiDti oDOortunity of hearino to the oe1ji is finallv decided by the resoond 4>i<ifet'qhT fl)-4?it*^ i^^ -<pg-s$i< i? siRiH 3ti^?r of representation in accordance disposed of with liberty to the fied coov of this order within ten of his arievances raised in -rtiis beinq made, resoondent No.l is the same within a oerwd of six of reoresentation after affording itioner as wet) as resoondent No.6. In the nieanwhile, it is dirfected that the oetitioner shall not be relieved fromhis oresent Dla^e of oostina till his reDreaantation nt No.l. Consequently, l.A. No.l; (|pplication for grant of ad-interini relief also stands disoosed of. Certified copy as per rule^. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge |g .^^..^7- ''-' ^h: T.T.TawRra.ga'TCKIIRRRiITSr—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000.