IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWPs No. 6982 and 6983 of 2011. Decided on: 25th August, 2011. 1. CWP No. 6982 of 2011. Narayan Chand. Vs. State Bank of India & anr. 2. CWP No. 6983 of 2011. Bodh Raj. vs. State Bank of India. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. S.D. Gill, Advocate. For the Respondents : ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners are aggrieved by the recovery proceedings. According to the petitioners, they are ready and willing to settle the entire dues to the respondent-Bank, given a short period. This request the petitioners can make before the Bank itself. In case the Bank does not agree, they can certainly approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal, which will be in a position to look into the request of the petitioners and pass appropriate and equitable orders. 2. With these observations, the writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. A copy of this judgment, duly authenticated by the Court Master, be given to the learned counsel for the petitioners to be produced either before the Bank or before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 25th August, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (tr) Judge.