IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25141 of 2010 PREM SHANKAR SHRIVASTAVA, SON OF SRI SHAMBHU NATH SHRIVASTAVA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 07.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 419, 420, 409, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that two persons were illegally appointed in the year 1988 in Government School Pandarak where subsequently when the petitioner joined as DSE, he issued a transfer certificate with regard to one of the illegal appointees in the year 1991. Considering that apart from this, there is no other material against the petitioner, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with three sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Sri S.K. Singh, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Barh, in Pandarak P.S. Case No. 95 of 1998 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, the second bailor shall be the son/wife of the petitioner and the third 2 bailor must be local since the petitioner belongs to district Balia (U.P.). The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)