@ ééIQH C€3UR’%" $3: SHHA??§SQ§RH: 3§LA$FUR Writ Peiition (S! No: 6945 9f 2§Q§ JP, Sahu‘ Sfo. Laie Shri Hariram Sahu, aaed abeut Past Koda'Taratie, $3 veam, rm. TahéH Cohad! Eu Dist: Dim Raiga* Kcda {CG}. Taraie, Pefmcaer ‘Varsus Raspondents ’i§ ‘tate of Chhamsg thfeuah Sesretary. Wa§e{ Reseurce$ Depart em RaipTJr (CG). z‘; Execuiivg Engineer Water Resources Department, Division Raigarh, Distt. Raiogarh {CG}. 3‘) Accaun'tant Generai. Pagariya buSkding. New Bus Stand read. Raipur (CG). _\ / \(l (Writ Petitian under Artime 226/227 of the Ccnsti‘mtion of india} SB: Hon’bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihetri, J. Préseat. Sm) D. Pafei caunzsel forfhe nefmoner. Smt. Smita éhaé, Pane: Lam/er for Em :espendenis No. .1 arzd 2! State. Shri Aiav Barik, Advocaie appéars on behalf cf Sh“ SK, Ber§waL Standing Cnunsel for Union Qf lndiaJrESpandent No.3. $RAL OmitEn {Fassw an ’ 133- 2%33 Wii‘n cansent 0f ieamed ccunsei awnearing for tha panes, ma marker is heard finaiEy. Th§s case penains ta grievance cf non-gmni' af reiiraE dues. This Ccurt, in the matter 3f W.P.s\io,4542!2m}4 (Baijnat’n Manda Vs. The Siaie of Chhattisgam & sthsrs) and 0fner connected marers, directed the Comm’rdee to consider rhe matter of retria§ dues as the disputed question of facts were invoived. The Committee was constituied by the Siate Government, pursuant to the order dared ”re-062806 passed in W.P.No.i£95'ii2606 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government of C‘nhattiegarri and others), ano order dared $32008 passed in MCC. No, 105 of 2GG8 (Stare or Chhariisgarh and others Vs. Baiiharh Menoai and another). Thus. this perition is sooereiy covereo by the juoigment ano. order dated. 31s: «January, 2DD8 oaseerj in WPNQ. 4642i2DQ4 ax' (Baéjnath Manda} (supra) ) as submiktea’ by ieamea‘ caunsel appearing far the parties 2) This petiiion is accordingly dEsposed 3f in the sama term$ Le.) the ofrice of fne Advocate Genera} és directed t0 semi the case to the Ccmmmee, within a perino’ of 15 days from the date of receipi of a ccpy cf ms crder. Yheieafier, the Comméifee shaii issue notice to the pgtitioner and ’the efficers cancemed! within a further period of 15 days‘ The Commitee shaii ccnskjer and pass ardar, in aocordanca wiih iaw, after affcrding prcper apponuni‘ty 0f hearing io the eetiiioner, The petitioner and the O'mcers ecncerneci may fiie additionai deeumenis, if necessary. The entire exercise, inciuding paymeni of retirai dues, if any, ta the petitioner, be compieied wiihin a pericé cf four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3) T‘ne petitioner sheii suppiy one extra copy of the petition to the State oounsei as wen as to the respondent No.3 for onward transmission to the Committee. Sdl- Raj u Satish K. Agnihotri Judge