IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2009 / 28TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 16898 of 2009(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. PATHUMMA, W/O.PAZHUMPARAMBIL KADER, KOORIKUZHI P.O., KAIPAMANGALAM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK. 2. SAKEENA, D/O.PATHUMMA, KOORIKUZHI P.O., KAIPAMANGALAM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KAIPAMANGALAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KAIPAMANGALAM, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY. 2. SECRETARY, KAIPAMANGALAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT P.O.KAIPAMANGALAM, PIN-680 681. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C).No.16898 of 2009 ------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of June, 2009. JUDGMENT Ext.P1 permit was issued to the petitioner by the respondent panchayat permitting him to put up a compound wall. Later, Ext.P2 notice has been issued under Rule 16 of the Kerala Municipal Building Rules, made applicable to the panchayat, intimating the petitioner that the permit is defective. The petitioner was asked to show cause why the permit should not be revoked. The petitioner has filed Ext.P3 objections in this regard. The matter has not reached a finality and hence this writ petition. Considering Ext.P3 and after hearing the petitioner, Writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent Secretary of the panchayat to take a decision in the matter shown in Ext.P2 within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- (V.GIRI) JUDGE sk/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge