IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL. Crl. Writ Petition No. 128 of 2004 (M/B) Anupam Sharma ……………… Petitioner Versus State of Uttaranchal & others………………. Respondents Mr. A.K. Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioner. Government Advocate for the State for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. With Crl. Writ Petition No. 112 of 2004 (M/B) Yashpal Sharma ……………. Petitioner Versus State of Uttaranchal & others……………. Respondents Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Government Advocate for the State, for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate. These writ petitions had been filed seeking a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the first information report dated 20.01.2004 in case crime No. 23/2004 under section 13(1)C, 13(1)D read with 13(2) P.C. Act and 409, 120B I.P.C., Police Station Dalanwala, District Dehradun. We have perused the F.I.R. dated 20.01.2004. It discloses cognizable offence and the allegations made therein are inherently probable. Therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the petitions. Both the petitions are dismissed, accordingly. (P.C. Verma, A.C.J.) (Rajesh Tandon, J.) Dt. 20.02.2004 HN