1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9571/2009 Kishore Singh Mertiya Vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of order : 7.10.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. RS Saluja, for the petitioner. <><><> The petitioner has grievance against the order of his transfer and according to the petitioner he is going to retire on 30th April, 2010 and according to him he should not have been transferred for such a short period of time of his service. This Court on several occasions entertained the writ petitions even when the transfer orders were challenged on various grounds and on various facts as well as on the ground of transfer at the fag end of the service of the employee and this Court also granted interim orders in some of the matters to protect the interest on the ground that Service Appellate Tribunal Bench at Jodhpur is not functioning. This court has passed detailed order asking explanation of the State Government in SBCWP No.6935/2009 – Ram Singh & ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & 2 Ors vide order dated 5.10.2009. This Court also dismissed several writ petitions challenging the transfer orders on the ground of availability of alternative remedy. In this case, I do not find any reason to interfere in the transfer order by exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India when bench has been constituted and if the bench is not functioning and litigants are suffering hardship since several years and they themselves have not taken any steps inspite of the orders passed by this Court in several matters, therefore, the petitioner's writ petition is not entertained and he may approach the appellate authority wherever the appellate authority is functioning. Hence, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. cpgoyal/-