IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33228 of 2008 Deepak Kumar Yadav @ Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Yadav & Anr Versus State Of Bihar & Anr ----------- 2 1.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are aggrieved by order of cognizance, dated 5.6.2002 passed in Kotwali PS Case No. 537/2001 by the C.J.M. Munger. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the informant has made a claim on a building in which the petitioners are running their shop. It is submitted that in order to remove the petitioners, he has indulged in all sort of nefarious activities and tried to involve them in false and fabricated cases The arguments raised on behalf of the petitioners cannot be considered at the stage of taking cognizance and the court has only to see whether a prima facie case is made out against the petitioners or not. Considering the aforesaid facts, I find no merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)