1 WP 4968.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4968 OF 2010 The Ahyaul-Uoom Education Society, Milly Colony, Osmanabad Through its Secretary Maulana Rahematulla Usman Khan Age : 32 Yrs., Occ. Service, R/o : Milliy Colony, Osmanabad. .... PETITIONER V E R S U S 1. The State of Maharashtra & Others. Through its Secretary Department of Primary Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai – 32. 2. The Education Officer (Primary) Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad. 3. The Director of Education State of Maharashtra, Pune. .... RESPONDENTS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S.S.Jadhavar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.V.Wagh, Asstt.Govt. Pleader for State. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 WP 4968.2010 CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE : 20/01/2011 ORAL JUDGMENT : [ PER – NARESH H. PATIL, J. ] 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned counsel for the respective parties, taken up for hearing. 2. The petitioner filed proposal in the year 2008-2009 for starting Urdu Medium Primary school. The District Committee recommended the case of the petitioner to the State. In view of the communication/letter dated 6/3/2010, the State Committee rejected the proposal, as the management did not mention the procedure of filling up the proposal properly as per column 14 and 15. According to the respondent – State it is submitted that they have adopted a new policy now to draw State mapping plan subject wise and thereafter the proposals would be called. The petitioner can submit the proposal as and when they are called. 3. We have perused the reply filed and the relevant documents placed on record. 4. In the facts of the case, we find that matter needs to be remanded back to the State for its fresh consideration. The State is entitled to pass appropriate orders and communicate the same to the petitioner. 3 WP 4968.2010 5. In light of the observation made as above, the impugned endorsement made by the State Recommendation Committee is set aside. The matter is remanded back. In respect of the policy of the State, this Court has not expressed any opinion. The State may decide the proposal as expeditiously as possible within three ( 3 ) months. The parties to act upon the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Court Shirastedar. Rule made absolute in the above terms. No costs. [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] knp/WP 4968.2010