FAO 215 of 2001 with RFA 158 of 2002. 24.6.2008 Present: Mr. Baldev Singh, counsel for the appellant. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, counsel for the respondent. Both these cases are taken up together as they are between the same parties and relate to the matrimonial dispute and the dispute regarding maintenance. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court, both the parties are present and have agreed to live together. They have settled their differences amicably. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the decree in RFA 158 of 2002 be kept in abeyance, that is to say that in case the appellant husband Shri Jagdish Chand Koundal does not maintain respondent Smt. Kamla Devi or turns her out of the house in future, she should not be driven to Court again. The decree subject matter of the appeal in RFA 158 of 2002 is affirmed and will become executable in case the respondent is neglected or turned out of the matrimonial house. This prayer of the learned counsel is reasonable. Both these appeals are disposed of as having been compromised, subject to the condition that the right of execution in RFA 158 of 2002 of the respondent therein Smt. Kamla Devi shall remain intact and in case she is neglected or turned out of the house by the -2- appellant Shri Jagdish Chand Koudal, the order of maintenance shall revive and become executable forthwith. There shall be no order as to costs. All pending applications shall stand disposed of. June 24, 2008 (PC). (Dev Darshan Sud), J.