1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10334/2008 {Ghasi Ram @ Ghasilal Sharma Versus The Appellate Tribunal & Others} Date of Order :: 22nd September, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma for the petitioner BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner filed a reference petition before the Jaipur Development Authority Appellate Tribunal in respect of plot in dispute alongwith an application for temporary injunction. A second application for temporary injunction was also filed. Both the applications have been dismissed by Tribunal vide order dated 1st September, 2008, which is under challenge in this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that he is in possession of land in dispute and his application for regularization is also pending, therefore, Tribunal committed an illegality in not passing a temporary injunction in his favour during the pendency of 2 reference petition. 4. I have examined the impugned order passed by the Tribunal in the light of submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. The Tribunal has observed that during the course of arguments, the counsel for the petitioner admitted that he has been dispossessed from the plot in dispute in January, 2008. It is also mentioned that petitioner tried to trespass again over the disputed land and a challan has already been filed against him under Section 34 of the Police Act. The land in dispute was acquired for J.D.A. and disputed plot is part of this acquired land, which has been sold in auction to respondent no.3-Rajendra Setia and a patta has already been issued in his favour. The reasons assigned by the trial court for rejecting the applications of the petitioner appear to be perfectly legal and justified and no interference in the said order is called for. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed in limine. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK