1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4240 OF 2009 ( State of Maharashtra -: versus :- Diwakar Dattatraya Telang ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 09, 2009. Heard learned A.G.P. for petitioner. In earlier round of litigation i.e. in Writ Petition No. 3151/2001 this Court directed State Government to expedite consideration of proposal of respondent for bringing him on CRTE as per Kalelkar Settlement. The said representation has been considered and the Government granted him CRTE status as junior receptionist w.e.f. 29.09.2003. Respondent / complainant then approach the Industrial Court again and sought that status from 13.12.1991. The Industrial Court has allowed his complaint. Learned A.G.P. has contended that as respondent did not enter the services through any recognised channel, grant of such benefit is unconstitutional. However, the argument is misconceived, because the application of Kalelkar Settlement is not in dispute. The directions of this 2 Court issued in Writ Petition No. 3151/2001, have been implemented and the status as CRTE has been conferred from 29.09.2003. Provisions of Kalelkar Settlement require such status to be given after 5 years, and hence the Industrial Court has corrected that error and granted that status from 13.12.1991. No case is made out warranting interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is thus dismissed, with no order as to costs. JUDGE Rgd.