r" ;:';;',:'::.'.;.''';::':':::'::^^l-^ lNTHEHlGHCOURTOFyUmCA^URE?ATl?BII-ASPUR :'''-.^:''eHHAttisGftRHWfc%^ffi:^ti^.^ ^^^ W.^P..(S)/'.N6.'''.,l:^>^"2-.'7?®!i20iE)7" / .e%¥;:^—l PETITIONER <^land Kui'nar^atiu, 'Sftri Madhav •..Sahy.3aged:;s^a:^uf::\,44.'.'years,^ Assistanlf^il'eagt-ier^ ©bvt.Pnrmary SchoOl ®—^ Sarafpali, Block - Basna, ^Distt. — Mahasamund -(G.G.)^.^:-'-;r :'::•-::-. RESRONDEm:^ - ^ .^^^^^^^^ ;:: ''-•<'.,-The.'^§i§CFietary';';£)e|3artnient'.cif .Educatic)n%'@^K;S^::x.,,Bhawan, ., Raipu:iE^©^;w?^:.;;'i>yW^.si;'.,::'.^ .' : Z^: Direeiort'%.:Rui>tit;i%|!.lnstruction,: ChhattisgarhGovt.Raipur ^>3'' DistricfEducation Qfficer; 1 Distt.-Mahasamund (C.GJ' ::^^.l:l::'':.:il": .. • :;'.^:.'.':^^ ft^ BlocK'Education Qfficer,^ Block—Basria, ' Distt: - Manasamund (6.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION 0F INDI^ FOR ISSUANeE OF SUiTABI-E WR!"T. WRITS. DlRECTrONETC.TO(C^^yST'l©EINTHEMATTER. HE61+COURT OF CHI-WTriSfiARH AT MLASPUR W PfSlNo 827 of 2007 Petitioner Nand Kumur Sohu Verais Itespondents : S*(rt®of0ih<rttisgarhand<rthers SB: Hon1>te Mr. Justka Satfeh K. Agidhrtri, J Presenf, Mr. Anil Siiyh Ra|iut, Advocate for 1he petitfoner. Mr. Satish fiupta, &y. Savt. Advoonte for the Stafte/respBndents. ^ Olt&Elt yassedon1hisl2tl't>ayofFebruary,2007) 1. The petitioner wws appointed on 31A87 (Annexur& P/l) as Assistant Teacher on fixed pay scate of Rs. 300/-. Afterconq)tet»nof one yeor probcFtion. he t»as gronfed regukiir pay scafa sf Rs. 97B-25- 1000-30-121(M0-1450-50-1650/-. 2. Leamed counsel cppearing for •th»petitioner submit»1hat1he issue involved in •Hie case is osto whether the petitioner is entitled • re9Ular poy scale w.e.f. Ihe date of mitint ap(wintmffit er ofter comptetion of probation period. 3. The issue involved, herein wus considerod by •the Mfld^a Prodesh Stcrte Admnistrotwe Trjbwnl. Jaba^ur m OA No. 274S^B9 (Atodhutont Yadu ond 56 ollwrs Vs. Sltrta of tt.P. & o'thers), wherein it was held that thesimilarly Sthwted teadiers are entrried *o reydar pny scafe w.e.f. Itie date of Ntid e(^»ointinent.The matter wos taken-up to the 1^'bte Si^ireme Courl'. ^e p^wd WM dismissed by -the Won'ble Supreme Cflurt upholding Itie deejsion of 7«- the TrilMjnal to •the effect that •rtie Teachers/Assistnnt Tewhers are entitled to regulcB'poyscale ft"om efate of initial qipoin-tmerri'. 4. Leamed counsel appearing for-thepetitioneri^further submits •rtwt this Court', whileconsidering Kw same issue m Sushil Thwiri A o'thers Vs. State fiovt. of Chhaftisyrfi & olhers (WP. (S) No. 9976 of 2006) by order dated 7-11-2006, has grented regular pay scate t».e.f. the date of initial appointment. 5. Leamed counsel appearing for •rtte parties jomtly sybmit Ihart' this case is squwely covered by the decision of •rtiis Court' in tiie case of Sushil Tiwari A o'rtwrs Vs. Stffte Sovt. of ChhcrH-isgarh A olhers (Supra). 6. In view of -that. thfe petition is atbwed m thesome terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge •cv. .. s^ ••