1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9645 OF 2010 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 93 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders | CORAM : P. R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 27 th JULY, 2010. 1 Adv. Shri P.S. Patil, Standing counsel for the committee is present for the applicant. Adv. Shri S.C. Yeram appears for respondent no. 1. AGP Shri Shelke is present for respondent no. 2. No notice is required to respondent no. 3 as he was not given notice when the order dt. 19-4-2010 was passed. 2 It is stated by the advocate of the applicant that though as per order of this court the respondents were to appear in person and file affidavit, the order was not communicated to the committee. Notice of contempt petition was waived by the 2 advocate and therefore no separate notice was issued to the applicant. Due to non- communication, respondents did not file affidavit on 19-4-2010 and it was not an intentional or deliberate act. In paragraph nos. 4, 5 and 6 it is also stated that the committee was not aware of the order of this court passed in Writ Petition no. 1727/2009 and earlier re-hearing was required as there was problem of coram. Considering the totality of circumstances, order is recalled to the extent of cost only. Application is accordingly allowed and disposed of. ( P. R. BORKAR, J.) dyb / office/ca9645.10.odt