IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos. 8680 of 2011 Date of decision: 30.09.2011 Nanak Chand vs. State of H.P. and ors. Coram : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG and Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG. for the State. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.(Oral): Writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- “(a) That impugned act of the respondents above stated, which amounts to execute inaction, may very kindly be quash and set aside (b) That respondents No. 1 to 3 may very kindly be directed to consider the case of the petitioner in view of Annexure: P-4 and keeping in view the seniority and regularization of the petitioner, he be designated as Junior Assistant and Senior Assistant prior in time than the private respondents (c) That in sequel to the above further directions may be issued to the respondents No. 1 to 3 to fix the pay of the petitioner accordingly by giving him the benefit of designation above stated and arrears may very kindly be ordered to be paid to the petitioner forthwith alongwith interest @ 9% per annum; 2 (d) That the respondents No. 1 to 3 may further be directed to consider the case of the petitioner for further promotion to the post of Superintendent Grade-II and Grade-I in accordance with law prior to private respondents, to secure the ends of law and justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that prayer No. (a) is not pressed at this stage. In the nature of order, we propose to pass in this case, it is not necessary to go into the merits of this case at this stage, since the petitioner prays for an opportunity to make a fresh representation before respondent No.2. Therefore, without expressing any opinion as to the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of as follows:- In the event of petitioner filing an appropriate representation before the second respondent within a week from today, the same shall be considered, in accordance with law, expeditiously and at rate before making further promotion. 3. All the pending applications also stand disposed of. Authenticated copy to the petitioner. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Ahuja) September 30, 2011 Judge (BSS/pankaj)