IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.145 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.01.2011 M/s Chopra Jewellers . . .Petitioner Versus Rajinder Pal Gupta . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against order dated 11.12.2010 passed by the Rent Controller by which cross-examination of Rajinder Pal Gupta (AW-1) by the petitioner was shown as opportunity given ‘nil’. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that Rajinder Pal Gupta (AW-1) was partly cross-examined on 15.11.2011 and 19.11.2011 and when the case was adjourned to 11.12.2010, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr.Nirmal Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate could not cross-examine him either in the pre-lunch or in the post-lunch session as he remained busy in other cases. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also filed affidavit dated 15.1.2011, sworn by Mr.Nirmal Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate, in this regard through CM No.1272-CII-2011, which is allowed subject to all just exceptions. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 11.12.2010 is hereby set aside. Petitioner is given one more opportunity to cross-examine Rajinder Pal Gupta (AW-1) on the date already fixed i.e. 21.01.2011 subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- as costs. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) January 18, 2011 JUDGE vivek