HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No.8616 of 2011 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to give Attender Job to the petitioner in any of the depots of APSRTC in Hyderabad city limits except Mehidipatnam depot with continuity of service and all other benefits and also pay the arrears of salary from the month of November, 2008 to till date. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he worked as a Conductor in the respondent-Corporation. On 10-11-2008, while returning from duty, he met with an accident and his right leg was seriously injured. He was kept in intensive care unit at NIMS Hospital and his leg was operated upon and a big part of bone was cut and removed and an iron rod was fixed. Later he filed W.P.No.26604 of 2010 seeking alternative appointment (sedentary duty) with continuity of service with all other benefits and also pay the arrears of salary from the month of November 2008. This Court, by its interim order, dated 27-10-2010 in W.P.M.P.No.33973 of 2010 in W.P.No.26604 of 2010, directed the 3rd respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for providing alternative employment in terms of the Circular issued by the respondents-Corporation, within a period of four weeks from that day. He also made a representation, dated 24-11-2010, requesting them to implement the orders passed this Court. Then the petitioner was given alternative employment as ‘shramik’ in mechanical section. Since the ‘shramik’ duty includes heavy works like bringing water buckets, wheel alignment etc., again, he approached this Court and filed the present writ petition. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents-Corporation and perused the material available on record. 4. In pursuance of the directions given by this Court in W.P.M.P.No.33973 of 2010 in W.P.No.26604 of 2010, the petitioner was given alternative employment as ‘shramik’ in accordance with the existing circular instructions. Now the grievance of the petitioner is that post of ‘shramik’ is very difficult job in view of medical grounds and hence, he may be given another alternative employment. 5. In that view of the matter, it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents-Corporation to refer the petitioner to the APSRTC Hospital and basing on the report that may be given by the doctors, necessary steps have to be taken to post him to a suitable post. 6. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU 16th June 2011 kvr