IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26255 of 2011 1.Md. Kari. 2.Md. Gholten. 3.Md. Bechan. All above three are sons of Md. Jalil. 4.Md. Subhan. 5.Md. Gabbar. 6.Md. Siraj. 7.Md. Sattar. All 4 to 7 are sons of Md. Halim. All are resident of Village Lahuar, P.S. Mahishi, District Saharsa. ---------- Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar. -------- Opposite Party ----------- 02/- 29/08/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. All the seven petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused out of eight in this case, relating to piece of land. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the application as regard to petitioner nos. 6 & 7 with a liberty to surrender before the court below within a fortnight and seek regular bail, where their prayer shall be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced of instant withdrawal. Permission is granted. Accordingly, the application with respect to petitioner nos. 6 & 7, namely, Md. Siraj & Md. Sattar, stands disposed of as withdrawn. 2 Submission as regard to remaining five petitioners is that though they are named but due to petty land dispute and the allegation leveled against them is omnibus and general and they are author of simple injuries caused to prosecution side. There is counter version also. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners (i.e. petitioner nos. 1 to 5) be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Mahishi P.S. Case No. 19 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)