THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 575 of 2005 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of respondents in making correct entries in the records as per the registered sale deeds and prepare SDR as per the registered sale deeds as arbitrary and illegal; consequently, to direct the respondents to correct the entries regarding splitting of joint pattas and make appropriate entries in the records. According to petitioner, his father purchased Ac.1-18 cents of land in the year 1964 through a registered sale deed vide document No.1838/64 in R.S. No. 4/3 of Davajigudem, Budhavaram village, Gannavaram Mandal, Krishna District from one G. Venkata Subba Rao. The said Venkata Subba Rao also sold some portion of the land in the same survey number to Bobba Rajendra Prasad. The documents in possession of Rajendra Prasad show that he has purchased an extent of Ac.0-51 cents. Thus, both of them have purchased land from the same owner and he had executed registered sale deeds for different extents. While deciding about the water distribution through channels and water rights, it had been noticed that the boundaries do not reflect the sale documents. Therefore, petitioner made representation to the local Mandal Officers. In the month of June, 2000, the M.R.O. issued proceedings declaring that the sub-division was not done as per the documents but only as per the situation existing on the land. Though the M.R.O. made appropriate recommendations to the higher authorities, they have not acted upon the same. Therefore, petitioner made a representation to the District Legal Services Authority and the same was numbered as LS AP 47/00 and report was called for from the M.R.O. According to petitioner, the splitting of joint pattas in the year 1975 was not done based upon the documents nor was he given any opportunity. Since the authorities have not acted properly, he filed petition before Lok Ayukhta. The said petition was dismissed observing that since the issue is pending before Lok Adalat, it was not proper for Lok Ayuktha to take further decision. Therefore, petitioner made further representation to the Legal Services Authority to expedite the hearing. As there was no further action, he withdrew the complaint vide letter dated 11.1.2005. Therefore, this writ petition. Learned Government Pleader on instructions submitted that even before the purchase made by the petitioner, one Gondi Babu Rajendra Prasad was shown as possessor of the land; therefore, the entries could not be corrected. Under those circumstances, without expressing any opinion on merits, 3rd respondent is directed to conduct detailed enquiry into the sale deeds held by petitioner and others and correct the entries on the basis of the sale deeds held by them, as per law. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU. Date: 02-12-2010. MVB.