IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.442 of 2009 SHYAMA DEVI, W/O SHRI RAMSRESTH BHAGAT, R/O VILLAGE-NANPUR, P.S.-NANPUR, DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. ………………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, TIRHUT RANGE, MUZAFFARPUR. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SITAMARHI. 4. MD. ASRAR AHMAD, OFFICE-IN-CHARGE, NANPUR POLICE STATION, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI. 5. RAM NARESH SHARMA, INSPECTOR, TOWN P.S., DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. 6. SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA, MEHSOL O.P., DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. …………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 21.01.2010 Grievance of the petitioner is that her son was picked up from the house in the night on 21.3.2009 at about 1 ‘O’ clock by the police and thereafter he was implicated in the case under Sections 399 and 402 instituted on 26.3.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that obviously when the son of the petitioner was taken into custody by the police in the night of 21st March, 2009 itself, he could not have been found in the night of 25.3.2009 preparing for committing any cognizable offence. He submits that petitions were filed before the Mukhiya and Surpanch and signed by the large number of villagers testifying that the son of 2 the petitioner was picked up by the police in the night of 21st March, 2009 and thereafter, he has been falsely implicated in the case after four days. From Annexure-4, it appears that the petition has been filed before the S.P., Sitamarhi also signed by the large number of villagers. In the circumstances, this Court directs the S.P., Sitamarhi to look into the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law in respect of the grievance of the petitioner. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of with the aforesaid directions. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)