THE HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.4665 OF 2009 Dt.12.10.2009 Between: Y.Govinda Reddy …………Petitioner/defendant Vs. G.Sreenivasulu …….Respondent/plaintiff O R D E R: The revision petitioner is the defendant in O.S.No.37 of 2008 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Gooty. The suit is filed by the respondent herein for recovery of money allegedly due under Ex.A-1-promissory note, dt.18.12.2007. The revision petitioner/defendant filed I.A.No.327 of 2009 with a prayer to send Ex.A-1- pronote to a Hand Writing Expert for examination of the signatures on Ex.A-1 with his admitted signatures on the vakalat and written statement. The said application was opposed by the plaintiff and the court below dismissed the application by order, dt.07.09.2009 holding that the signatures on the vakalat, which was filed on 11.06.2008 and the signatures on the written statement filed on 16.09.2008 cannot be held to be admitted signatures, since there is every chance of altering the signatures to avoid the suit claim. Since there is no other document, which contained the admitted signature of the defendant at the relevant period of execution of Ex.A-1 promissory note, the court below held that there are no grounds to allow the petition and accordingly dismissed I.A.No.327 of 2009. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The reasons assigned by the court below while dismissing the application are in accordance with the settled principles of law and the order under revision does not suffer from any patent error of fact or law. Hence the interference by this court is not warranted. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________ G.ROHINI J., Dt.12.10.2009 tjs