IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24426 of 2009 SIKANDER MISTRY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody since 6.3.2009 in a Police case under Sections 25(1-B) A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act for allegedly having been found in a gun factory. The submission is that the petitioner was only working for gain as a source of livelihood. Considering the period of custody, this Court is not persuaded to enlarge him on bail. The application is rejected. If so advised, he may renew his prayer for bail before the court below after one year of custody, which shall be decided afresh without being prejudiced by the nature of the present order. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)