IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 1733 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 14.03.2011 Lakshma and others ....Petitioners Vs. S.E. (P.Way) Northern Railways, Panipat and others ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL ****** Present:- Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) This petition assails the order dated 05.03.2011 (Annexure P6) passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Panipat, whereby the application filed by the plaintiff- petitioners (hereinafter referred to as 'the petitioners') for directing the respondents No.6 to 8 to produce themselves for DNA test, was dismissed. Counsel for the petitioners has stated that the petitioners have already led oral as well as documentary evidence in order to establish that Lakshma is the widow, whereas Mann Singh and Phool Bai are the son and daughter respectively of Jai Ram and the lady claiming herself to be Lakshma is not the widow of Jai Ram. In these circumstances, no interference could be made out. Dismissed. (A.N.JINDAL) 14th of March, 2011 JUDGE ajp