vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1756 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1756 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1756 OF 2008 Harinarayan G. Bajaj ... Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.Zal Andhyarujina i/b Vivek Sharma for Applicant Mr.H.J. Dedhia, APP, for State Mr.A.H.H. Ponda for Respondent Nos.2 & 3 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. DATED: JUNE 23, 2008 JUNE 23, 2008 JUNE 23, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The application has been filed for quashing the order dated 9.4.2008 passed on an application preferred by the complainant on 20.2.2008. By this application, the complainant sought (a) that a reference to the contents of article 1 by the complainant in his evidence be mentioned in the notes of evidence on page 236 and (b) that article 1 alongwith its annexures be exhibited and read in evidence. It is submitted on behalf of the applicants that the learned Magistrate has erred in refusing to accept this document or to mark it as an exhibit. 2. Reliance is placed on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Bipin Shantilal Panchal v/s. State of Gujarat, I (2001) CCR 278 (SC I (2001) CCR 278 (SC I (2001) CCR 278 (SC) to submit : 2 : that the practice and procedure adopted in criminal trial has undergone a sea-change in view of this judgment. 3. In my opinion, after reading the evidence on record, it is obvious that the witness was referring to exhibit P-8(A) in his answers. Exhibit P-8(A) are letters written by various persons informing the Bombay Stock Exchange that they had authorised the handing over of shares of Sesa Goa Limited to M/s.Anil Shah Securities and Finance Limited. It was sought to be argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that reference in that answer was to a letter dated 25.9.1997, which is the first page of article 1. In my opinion, this is a misreading of the answer given by the witness. The order of the trial Court does not suffer from any infirmities which require to be corrected by this Court in exercise of its powers under section 482 of the Cr.P.C. 4. Criminal Application is dismissed.