••'^^s^^^ 'te.. ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (2271 No. 4090 OF 2011 PBTITIONER {AppUcant] RESPONDENTS: VERSUS 11 [Non-appUcaat No. 1 ] 2) [Non-applicant No.2 ] 3) Ranveer Sin.gh Venna, S/o Late Sagun Ram Verma, aged about 65 years, R/o village Chorbhatthi, Tehsil Araag, District Raipur (C.G.). Chliatdsgarh Board of Revenue, Circuit Bench, Raipur (C.G.). Sita Devi Paadey, Widow of late Ravimaai Pajndey, aged about not Jsnown to petitioner, village Chorbhatthi, TehsU -Arang, Distdct Raipur(C,G.). State of Chhattisgarh, through The Secretaiy, Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.). WRJT PETITION UNDBRARTICLE227^F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB :Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri Ashish Surana, Aiivocate for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, P.L. for the State. OR&L- ORDER (Passedon 28/07/2011) By fhis petition under Article 227 of fhe Constitution of India petitiouer has / chailenged fhe legality and propriely of the order dated 23/5/2011 passed by Board ofRevenue, Chhatdsgarh Bilaspur (Circuit Coi.irt Raipur) in Case No. R.N. 14/R/B-121/56/2011 whereby stay appUcation filed on behalf of the present petitioner has been disiaissed in absencc ofany legal ground. 2. Order inipugned perused. In case of inutation proceediag that too when second appeal is pendiug relating to rights aad obligation ofthe paritv, by dfamissing fhe appUcation for stay Board of Revenue has not comiuitted aay Ulegality wan-auting any uiterference in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Consequently, petition_is Uable to be disinissed aad is hereby dismissed. 3. I.A No. 1 is also disinissed. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge i-i'