.-• ® ^ c IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATIJRE AT BILASPUR W.P. No.tD36of2002 -6 DURG MATSODYOG VIKAS SAHAKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT, A SOCIETY DULY REGISTERED UNDER THE RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF THE M.P. CO-OPERATIVE SOCIEITIES ACT, 1960 HAVING ITS REGISTRATION N0.1565 THROUGH THE PRESIDENT ^GANESH RAM DHIWAR, SON OF SHRI ASHA RAM DHIWAR, MATHAPARA, DURG. VERSUS OF ?GARH, THE ^Y, MINISTRY rCULTURE CO- tVE AND IIES, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR. THE COMMISSIONER, RAIPUR DIVISION, RAIPUR. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DURG. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, DURG. 5. DURG MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER, DURG. PETITIONER .f<?t^ ^'^^"^^^ »-^w!«-6r' <r;":'", ...-o' (^L ^. U-- RESPONDENTS ^ WRIT PETITTON TTNDER ARTTCLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN OF TNDIA FQR THE ISSURANCE OF WRITS TN TTTE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORART AND/OR ORDER(S). AND/OR DIRErTTON(S^m THF.^ATURE OF WRITS .-.^^el ^ x^\^ ^lt^y TO ^ (S) OF CHHATTISGARH AT WRIT PETSTSON N0.1036 Petltiioner Versus Durg Matsodyog 'Vikas Sahakari Sanstha IVSaryadJt. of Chhattisaarh & Others WRiT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE OF THE CONSTiTUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'Me Mr. Satlsh K. Agnlhotri, J.l .Present^- Shri Kshltiz Sharma, Advocate for the petstioner. Shri ShashanR Thakur, Panei Lawyer for the State, Shri Avlnash SVIishra, Advocate forthe respondent No.5. (Passed on 15th day of September, 2010) • • 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that in view of the response ftied by the respondents No. 1 to 4, the petitlon has become infructuous, as nothing suryives tbr adjudlcation. 2. Leamed counset appearing for other si.de have no objection. 3. it is ordered, as prayed for. 4. Accordingsy, the writ petition is dismlssed, as having become Infructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge ashok