CMPMO No. 86 of 2010 16.8.2010 Present: Mr. N.K.Sood counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Ajay Sharma counsel for respondent No.1. Mrs. Suman Thakur counsel for respondents No. 3 and 4. This Court had directed the petitioners to make a representation to the respondents to have the matter settled outside the Court. It appears that no representation has been made in this behalf. This petition arises out of the order dated 6.2.2010 whereby the learned trial Court had disallowed the amendment of the suit. Bare reading of the order shows that the plaintiff had filed a suit praying for a decree restraining the defendants from damaging or using in any manner the building and other assets of the concern lying in the premises of Himalaya Industrial Corporation. It is not disputed that the plaintiff is a defaulter and the plaintiff’s unit was taken over by the defendants. Written statement was filed on 7th June, 1997 and various opportunities were given to the plaintiff to lead evidence and the application has been filed after 3-½ years of the filing of the suit. The pleas now raised could easily have been raised earlier. There is total lack of diligence in filing the application. The order of the learned trial Court calls for no interference. Hence dismissed. 16th August, 2010 ( Deepak Gupta ) ™ Judge.