THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 12106 OF 2010 Dated 1st June, 2010 Between: M.S.Sikamani and three others …Petitioners And The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. By its Superintendent of Police and six others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri V.Jagapathi Counsel for respondents 1 and 2: G.P for Home The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent No.2 in granting police aid to the petitioners in pursuance of order dated 18.12.2008 in I.A.No.1178 of 2008 in O.S.No.303 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Puttur, Chittoor District. In the manner in which the writ petition is proposed to be disposed of, it is not necessary to refer to the facts in detail. It will suffice to note that when respondents 6 and 7 allegedly started interfering with the possession and enjoyment of their lands, the petitioners filed I.A.No. 238 of 2010 in the abovementioned suit for granting police aid. Respondent No.5 has filed a counter-affidavit in the said application, which is stated to be pending. However the petitioner filed the present writ petition for the same relief as claimed in the said I.A. In Vadlakonda Narender vs. Station House Officer [1], this Court, while holding that it has ample power to grant police aid for implementation of the orders of the civil Court, however, held that before a person approaches this Court by way of a writ petition, he is required to pursue his remedy before the civil Court which granted the order of injunction. Indeed on their own showing, the petitioners have approached the civil Court and the I.A filed by them for grant of police aid is pending therein. In my opinion, there is no reason for the petitioners to file the present writ petition at this stage when the said I.A is pending. The proper course for the petitioners is to pursue the pending I.A and it is only in the event of their not getting any relief in the said I.A., that they can approach this Court. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition, WPMP No.15261 of 2010 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 1st June, 2010 vrn [1] 2009 (5) ALT 426