@ I F C SPUR OSUION OF (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.sharma, J.) am Present-8111i Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate with Shri Vikr Dixit, Advocate for the petitioner. Respondent not ‘Iiotice’d. ORDER {Passed on 12/ 12/201 1} 1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India petitioner has challenged the legality and propriety of the order dated 29/9i20 11 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court Raipur (C.G.) in case No. 82/ 10 whereby application for taking documents on record tiled on behalf of the petitioner after closing of the evidence of petitioner has been dismissed. 2. Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate with Shri Vikram Dixit, Advocate for the petitioner is heard. 3. Copy of the impugned 0rd er and copy of other documentsiperused. Considering the fact that petitioner has tried to file documents after closing her evidence, Court below has dismissed the application. Considering the order impugned, I do not find any ground for interference inexercise of supervisory jurisdiction. Consequently, petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. However, petitioner is at liberty to act in accordance with law. No order as to costs. Interim application is also dismissed. Sd/— T.P. Sharma Judge HGH COURT O HHATTISGARH AT BILA W.P. {UIA 227) No. 7486/2011 PETITIONER WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CNTITT INDIA. t Jasbir Kaur Saini W/o Guramel Sirzgh Saini, Aged about 50 years, R/o Govind Nagar 9/1 City I Station Raipur Tahsil and Distn‘ct Raipur (C.G.), VERSHS Guramel Singh Sajni S10 Late Gurucharan Singh Aged about 45 years) R/o Farm House Near Gurunanak Hall, Gurunanak Nagar Tahsil and Distlict Raipur (0G4.