HIQH COURT OF CHHATriSSAIW AT BIU PUR W. P. (S»No. 41Ztof2007 PETITIONER Shreedter Pandey, Aged about 39 yeare, S/o Shri Gofakhnath Pandey, A^lstant Teacher, R/o Village Sanwarapal, Tahsil Jagdalpur, Distt.Bastar(C.G.) RESPONPeNTS VERSUS 1. State of Chtottlsgarti, Threigh Secretaiy, School Education Departmert, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Dinector, Public Instruction Department, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Offleer, EAStrwt Bastar District Bastar (C.G.) 4. Block Educatlon OfScset, Basteir (Jagdalpur), Distt.Sastar(C.G.) 5. Treasure & Aocounts, Raipur, Distt. Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CCWSTITUTION QF INDIA Slngle Bench; Hon'bte Mr. Ju^ioe SaUsh K. Agnlhotrl, Present: 1. 2. Thakur Smt. Sangeeta Mishra, Advacateforthe p^itioner. Mlss Deepali Pandey, Panel lawyerforthe respon<tent8/Stat& ORESR (Passed on thls 16" day of July, 2007) The question crf law involved herein is aato 'wheSner the p^fttoner is entltled to regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of inttlat appointment w from the date ct comptetion of probation period. Leamed counset appeanng fbr the petitiener as well as fer the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts and questien of law fnvolved in the present writ petition are the sane to that of in W.P. (S) t\to. 7002 of 2806 (Vogeshwar Piasad Patanwar Vs. State of OilurtMsyirii & oUiers), which was dlsposed ofvicte order dated 15.12.2056. In view ofthe above-stated submjsstons made by leamed oeunsel appeartng for the parties, ttie writ petitlon is disposed of in the same tenns, subjed to verification of the facts. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri , Judge ,