6§ HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTESGARH, BILASPUR w.P.gS) mo. 5354 of 20w PETETIONERS 1 Mahendra Kumar Boxjha S/o Shn' Swarup Ram BOIjha, Age about 38 years, U.D.T. Govt. Boys Midd16 School, Dongardula, Block ~ Nagari, DiStt. — Dhamtari (CG) Gyanendra Kumar Sahu S/o 8111i Yashwant Kumar Sahu, Ago about 32 years, A$$tt Teacher, Govt. Boys 'Micldle School, Dongarclula, Block — Nagari, Distt. — Dhamteri (C.G.) Daymem Singh Nag S/o. Shri Jairam Nag, Age about 39 years, Asstt. Tcacher, Govt Primary School, , Mudijhalnvar, B10ck ‘ — CO Magarlod, Distt.— Dhamtari (C.G.) Krishna Kumar Kanwar Sjo Shri Gaoga Raln Kemwar, Age about 4O years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primaiy School, Kulhan'kot, Block— Magarlod, Distt. - Dhamtari (0G,) Meghu Ram Sahu S/o Shri Nathel Ram Sahu, Age about 43 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Pw'maty School, Gadadih, Block — Magarlod, Distt. — Dhamtari(C.G.) Dujram Dhruw Sjo Shri Jagatu Ram Dhruw, Age about 41 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Pm'maly School, Dudhwara, Block — Magarlod, Distt. - Dhamtarl (C.G.) Madhusudan Nag S/o Shri Pancham Singh Nag, Age about 45 years, Ass‘tt. Teacher, Govt. Primaly School, Hatbaxldh, Block — Magarlod, Distt.~ Dhamtari(C.G.) Sukhuram Chhaideya S/o Shri Vishram Singh Chhaideya, Age about 43 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Ghatula, Block — Nagari, Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) Kantri Kumar Som S/o Shu’ Shital Ram Som, Age about 42 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Jaitpun’, Block. — Nagari, Distt. — Dhamtari (ea) ‘ 5—7: Educah'on Nagali/‘Magarlod, Distt. Dhamtari (co) (Writ Petition under Article 2260f the Constitution of India) Appearance: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioners. Shn' Ajay Dwivedi, Pahel Lawyer for the State on advance copy. RESPQNDEETS 10 @e 2 W‘PJS) No. 5364/2007 Mah€sh Suxyawanshi S} o Shn' K€shar Lal Suryawanshi, Age about 42 years, Asstt. Téacher, Govt. Primary Schaol, Jaitpuri, Biock — Nagari, Distt‘ —- Dhamtari {c.G.) Loknath Dév Sio Shu’ Amara Singh D&V, Age about 42 yssars, U.D.T., Govt, Primaly School, Birgudi, Biock — Magarlod, Distt. ~ Dhamtari (C.G.) Birondra Kumar Yaduraj S/o 811117 Ram Lal Yaduraj, Age about 47 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt, Middle Schoo1, Pursiya, Block —— Nagali, DiSit. — Dhamtan'(C.Cn} Hememt Kumar Sahu Slo Slui Natthu La} sahu, Ago about 49 ysars, Asstt. Teacher, Govt Middle School, Purisya, Block — Nagari, Distt.— Dhamtari (C.G.) Chait Ram Koushil S/o Shrfl Chhedu Ram Koushil, Age about 37 years, Asstt. Tcachcr, Govt. Middle School, Pursiya, Block — Nagari, Distt. — Dhamtari(C.G.) Versus State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, School Educenion Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Depamhent Dhamtari (co) District Education Oilicer Dhamtari Block Ollicer 11 12 14 “7? 3 W.P.§S) No. 536412007 GRAL aRDER g17.o9.2oo7) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on admission. petitioners have pas$6d DEd‘ Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the expensss, themfore, thEy are ami’ded to mceive examination on their own two advaxlm increments according to circuiais dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also submits that in maxiy identical mattsrs, ths pgtitioms havelxen allowsd in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadw Vs. Municigal Camemtianz Burg and another {2006 {1y MEIR-CG 963., He submits that the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by This legal position is not disputed by the learned counsel for the State. However, he submits that the o to verification regarding petitioners’ such qualification. order passed in case of Yoshwant Kama veiiflcation of the facts as to Wiiethe acquired DEd Examination Certificates Whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. the said Judgmem. rder may be passed in terms of the said judgment, but it shall be subjected Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed in terms of the. Municipai Corporation, Durg and another (Suym) subject to as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 ans 01.08.1999 and further The petition stands iinally disposed of. No order as to r_"—'—’—————’——"——‘-’\ 1 costs. vatti Sdl- 1 Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge \ r Bhm‘adwaj Vs. r the petitioners had on their own expenses