•^l IN THE 1-IIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) ^' i> WRIT PETITJO N IM 0. 4~~? 3 -4-/2004 PETITIONER ^^},.,'.;^'^Anja^DeviBhatt,agedabQyt 30 ^ ^^'^^^ears^v^^_of \^^ Shr\ U^^ 1^-^ ^ ^i!;J\Kufr}ar' R/°- Sonumuda, Ward No. ^•^.^ ^- ' '38, Raigarh;Distt. Raigarh (CG) ^c^^..-^ ,' -—^,-.^:- :-,,',-^ ^^'. '"^ RESPQMDENTS VERSUS 2. ..&* t>7 C^<, /^r- -5'; The Union of India, through SecFetary,Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi. State 6f Chhattisgarh, through : ~the Secretary, Department of Education, Mantralay (CG) State of Madhya Pradesh, through .: Secretary, DeRat-tmerit of Education, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP) The Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchalnalay, Raipur(CG) The District Education Officer, Distfc. Raigarh CChhattisgarhy WRIT RETmON UNDER ARTICL.ES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITIJTiQN OFINDJA. 1950 FfSfJSSUANeEQlWRiFTINTHE NATURE ORMANDAMUS ETC. AND.RORAPPROPRI/yrEORDER 01. RARTICULARS OF 'FHE PETITmNER Asshown in the cause-title. 02; PARTICULARS'OFTHE RESR0 E)ENTS; As shown in tl'ieeause title. ^--S HIGH COURT OPJODICATURE CHHATnSGARH : BILASPUR SmGLE BBNCH : HON'BLB SHRI SATI8HK. AGNffIOTRI, J. WRITPBTITION N0.4794 OF 2004 Petitioner Rescondents versus AnjaU Devi The Unionoflndia aud ofhers Present : Shri Viaay Paadey, couusel for fhe petitioner. Shri S.K. Beriwal, counsel for the respondent No.l. ShriI.N. Sbrivastava, Panel lawyer for fhe State. > ORALORDBR (27th June, 2006) 1. The husbaad of the petitioner namely Shri Uttara Kumar died whUe working as Peon in the Departinent of EduGation at Raigarh District ia haraesson 20.3.1998. 2. Thereafter, fhe petitioner has made au application. for coiupassionate appoiatment on 28.12.1999. 3. The application ofthe petitioner was rejected ou fhe grouiid fhat the applicatiou was iiot ffled in tiiae. 4. The Govenunent of Chhattisgarh, by its circular dated 2.2.2006, has directed atl the departnients to consider cases of aU fhe eligible dependant-legal heir ofthe deceasGii^eiu.ployees, who Sied m hamess between 1.11.1997 to 31.10.2000 for conipassionate appointiaent. 5. Accordingly, the GoverrLment of Clihattisgarh is directed. to consider fhe ease ofthe petitioner as per its own pirculaT dated 2.2.2006 and also ia yiew of the order passed by; this Court in .«* Writ Petition No.3879/ 2004 and ofher connected matters on its own inerit, in accordance with law, wifhiu a petiod ofeight weeks, on such Tepresentation being ffled by the petitioner. For fhe reasons stated above, the writ petition stauds disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/'- Sarisfa K. Agnihotri Judge >