IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH JANUARY 2010 / 23TH POUSHA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 11 of 2010() --------------------------- CRIME NO.950/09 OF CHENGANNUR POLICE STATION PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 & 2: ------------------------------------------------- 1. SIBEESHKUMAR, POOVAPPALLIL S.S.VILLA, PERISSERY P.O., CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. SIJEESH KUMAR, POOVAPPALLIL S.S.VILLA, PERINSSERY P.O., CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.VINODKUMAR SRI.SUSHANTH.J. RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: -------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.TEKCHAND THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. --------------------------------------------- B.A.No.11 of 2010 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of January, 2010 ORDER In paragraph 1 of the Bail Application, it is stated that the petitioners are accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.950 of 2009 of Manimala Police Station. In paragraph 2 of the Bail Application, it is stated that the petitioners are the accused in Crime No.950 of 2009 of Chengannur Police Station. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioners are not the accused in Crime No.950 of 2009 of Manimala Police Station. It is also submitted by him that in Crime No.950 of 2009 of Chengannur Police Station, the offence alleged against the accused are not under Section 308 of the Indian Penal Code, but under some provisions of Motor Vehicles Act. In these circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh Bail Application with correct details. Permission is granted. Accordingly, the Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh Bail Application. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE csl