-•^^^\y^"^'y^^. I N THE HON'BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTSGARH AT- BILASPURfCHHATTISGARH) M.C.C.NO. ...<A.L'^...../2011 ^<"^-, APPLICANT ..^'//- ^'/••'"v^ <^yy>^ ^./-yx^' ^""^"x7 ^y^x '<^yv <^' NON-APPLICANTS VERSUS 01. 02. 03. 04. SUDHAKAR RAO SILLEDAR Agedabout 63years S/o Shri Krishna Rao Silledar R/o Tilaknagar, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur(Chhattisgarh) DINKER RAO SILLEDAR Aged about 73 Years S/o Shri Rrishna Rao Silledar R/o Tilaknagar, Bilaspur Distnct- Bilaspur(Chhattisgarh) RAMAKANT TOKAIKER Aged about 47 Years S/o Shri Raghunath Rao (Bala Saheb Tokaiker) R/o Chotee Umri, Akola Tah.+Distt.- Akola(Maharastra) SMT. USHA CHOUDHERY Aged about 69 years W/o Shri C.D. Choudhery R/o Aangrai Saheb ka bada Lasker, Gwalier Tah.+Distt.- Gwalier(M.P.) BHASKERRAO Aged about 64 years S/o Shri Krishna Rao Silledar R/o Tilaknagar, Bilaspur Tah.+Distt.- Bilaspur(Chhattisgarh) APPLICATION FOR MODIFICATION OF EARTICULARS OF THE PARTIES IN DECREEDATED 26-10-2010 (FA N0. 199/2008 SUDHAKAR RAO SILLEDAR VS DINKER RAO SILLEDARAND OTHERS) BY RECALLING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 21-10-2010 PAS8EDBY THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI PRASHANTlKUMARMISHRA, . Appellant counsel, most respectfully subinits as uiider:- ;^-"-i^-^ '•-':^ '•3538868% a Xf-HC—78 sn^wv R-ii<* "cPIT STf^t $fi*<i^i 3^t •^qT^rq^ yit-'-l'liS, "l's|<'ll'H'i,< <^A CC <3^-2-y f/ WW(T9>W9» ••^200 ar^ 'r^r (<y{^^) TRHWHfCT ant'iT Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumair Mishra. J. 26.07.2011 Shri Rakesh Kumar Dub^y, counsel for the applicant. Shri Manoj Paranjpe, co^insel for non-appUcants No.2 and 3. This MCC has been pr^fen-ed for con'ection of particulars of the parties in the decree pa^sed by this coiirt in pursuance to judgment dated 21st October, 2{)10 in F.A. No. 199/2008. Leamed counsel for tfae would point out tfaat name of has wrongly been typed as Din necessary for putting the complication in fiiture. Shri Manoj Paraiype, applicants No.2 and 3 has no o{ Notices were issued to inspite ofservice ofnotice '&ey '^'E^tc'i^l'1 'lTF^ff ^' f^T3^ Tt^T^T i;3fR(t;3Ii^t applicant would submit that name of appellant's father is Shri Kristjna Rao Silledar whereas in the decree name of his father is mentioded as Shri Krishra Rao Silledar. He ^espondent No.l Dinker Rao Silledar ssh Rao SUledar. Leamed counsel woultl submit that the corrections are record straight and to avoid any leamed counsel appearing for non- ajection to the prayer. non-applicants No.l and 4, however are not present before this court. In view ofthe above, th^ MCC is allowed. Name oftbe fafher of appellant Tie corrected as |!hri Krishna Rao Silledar in place of Xf-HC—78 sii^T^a R-ii* '^t Sf^ StiHi<?> c^ w^cir *Nicb ?~ST --li'-i!")'-), yrti-'-i'i's, i^diyy .^..^...A^.'^'.L'^.i.i.. 3ffi'?I'q?^' (' ^) T TOnw ^ftt in^'1 Shri Krishra Rao Silledar, Rao Silledar be corrected as parriculars ofthe appellant Bilaspur be corrected as nanie ofrespondeat No.l typed as Dinesh pinker Rao Silledar and similarly the wr|tten as Tilakn^ar, Boalsburg, District Tilaia^agar, Bilaspur District-Bilaspur in the decree prepared in pursuancej 2010 inF-A.No. 199/2008. MCC stands disposed o^ <hl^^1l •RM"?l' ^F 'f^r^ Tf^T^T ^;3TfiPT31R7f to the judgment dated 21 Oetober, ^...^•rM""' Judge f-i^^'^S^ffi'i';^tP^'5?..?^ ?'^^";^ 'j