CW 7395/08 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7395/08 Narendra Kumar Versus Jaipur Vidhyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd. & Anr. DATE OF ORDER : 03/08/2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Manish Gupta, for petitioner *** Instant petition has been filed by petitioner with the grievance that demand notice issued from the office of respondents dt.20th April, 2008 for release of electricity connection includes certain penalties with regard to alleged theft, of which endorsement has been made. However, in pursuance of demand notice, petitioner has deposited alleged penalty also as evident from Ann.7. Bone of contention of counsel for petitioner is that demand notice issued by respondents is contrary to rules and same has been deposited by him since there was no option left as he was interested to get the agriculture connection without any further loss of time. But, since demand is bad, he has assailed the same by filing instant petition. CW 7395/08 [2] Suffice it to say that what has been demanded by respondents for release of electricity connection has already been deposited by petitioner. If he has any grievance in regard to alleged demand raised by them, he can avail remedy either by approaching to the Settlement Committee as constituted by the authorities or may avail other remedy available to him under law. This court is not inclined to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction U/Art.226 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, writ petition stands dismissed. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA7395CW08 3-8.doc