1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.205 OF 2011 (Sau. Shila S. Wankhede vs. State of Maharashtra and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 18, 2011 Heard Shri Sonbhadre, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mrs. Dangre, learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent nos. 1 and 2. The following facts are not in dispute : The petitioner was appointed as Anganwadi Sevika in the year 2006. In the year 2008, the petitioner was appointed as Swayam Sevika for eleven months. There is nothing on record to demonstrate what was the status of the petitioner on 14/10/2010 when advertisement was issued for filling up the post of Anganwadi Sevika. 2 Shri Sonbhadre, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that since the petitioner was working as Anganwadi Sevika earlier, she has a right to be absorbed in the post of Anganwadi Sevika before the said post is filled in through the advertisement dated 14/12/2010. In the backdrop of the above facts and for want of evidence to demonstrate that the petitioner on 14/12/2010 (date of advertisement) was working as Anganwadi Sevika as well as the document, which is placed on record, shows that in the 2008, the petitioner was working as Swayam Sevika, it is difficult for us to accept the contentions canvassed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner. There is no substance in the petition. Hence, the same is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE khj