IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARILAL WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 25TH KARTHIKA 1933 LA.App..No. 408 of 2006() ------------------------ LAR.35/1989 OF II ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, THRISSUR ................. APPELLANT / 3RD RESPONDENT : -------------------------------------------------- THE ADMINISTRATOR, GURUVAYUR DEVASWOM, GURUVAYUR. BY ADVS. SRI.N.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC RESPONDENTS / CLAIMANTS / R1 & R2 : ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. P.R.INDIRA, D/O.PUDUSSERY RAMAN, PUDUSSERY HOUSE, PATTURAICKAL, THRISSUR. 2. P.R.CHANDRAMOHAN, S/O.PUDUSSERY RAMAN, DO. DO. 3. P.R.RADHAKRISHNAN, S/O. DO.DO. 4. SARAYUDEVI.P.R., D/O. DO. DO. 5. P.R.SREEDEVI, D/O. DO. DO. 6. P.R.HEMA, D/O. DO. DO. 7. P.R.MOHANAKRISHNAN, S/O. DO. DO. 8. SYAM, S/O.LATE SOBHA, R/AT. DO.DO. 9. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA) GENERAL, THRISSUR. 10. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. R1 TO R8 BY ADV. SRI. M.C.GOPI R9 & R10 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. C.R. SHYAM KUMAR THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & K. HARILAL,JJ. .................................................................... L.A.A.NO.408 OF 2006 ................................................................... Dated this the 16th day of November, 2011. JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J. This appeal is preferred by the requisitioning authority of Guruvayur Devaswom. The properties under acquisition were situated in Guruvayur village and obviously in close proximity to the famous Sreekrishna Temple at Guruvayur. In the impugned award, the learned Subordinate Judge has fixed the land value under acquisition at Rs.13,200/- per cent. 2. Having gone through the impugned judgment and having kept in mind the value of the land in Guruvayur village as discernible from various other decisions of this Court and keeping in mind the importance of Guruvayur town ship, we are of the view that the rate currently fixed by the reference court is not excessive. The appeal will stand dismissed. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that the entire decree debt was deposited before the execution court and that even now the attachment which L.A.A.NO.408 OF 2006 : 2 : was issued by that court in respect of properties of the appellant is continuing. We direct the execution court to lift the attachment once the court is convinced that the decree debt is deposited. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. K. HARILAL, JUDGE. cl