IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29307 of 2008 SUNIL SINGH & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 20.8.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Barahra P.S. Case No.47 of 2008 for the alleged offences registered under sections 323, 379, 435 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3 and 4 of the S.C. & S.T. Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the allegations made in the F.I.R. would reveal that the specific allegation is not against these petitioners although their names find place. The specific allegation is against co-accused Madan Singh and Sangram Singh. It is further submitted that as such no allegation has been attributed attracting the aforesaid alleged offences. Considering the above, it is directed that petitioners no.1 to 5, namely, Sunil Singh, Babblu Singh, Sachin Singh, Sanjit Singh and Sintoo Singh, respectively, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Barahra P.S. Case No.47 of 2 2008, within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ara, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)