1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 46 OF 2008 with WRIT PETITION NOS. 47 OF 2008 48 OF 2008, 49 of 2008, 50 of 2008 51 of 2008, 52 of 2008, 53 of 2008, 54 of 2008, 55 of 2008, 56 of 2008 57 of 2008, 58 of 2008,59 of 2009 60 of 2008 61 of 2008, 62 of 2008, 63 of 2008 64 of 2008, 65 of 2008 66 of 2008 67 of 2008, 68 of 2008, 69 of 2008 The Zilla Parishad, Beed through Executive Engineer .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. .. Respondent. --- Mr. N.L. Jadhav, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K.B. Choudhari, /S.K. Kadam, /P.P. More,/ D.R. Korde,/ Smt. V.A. Shinde, AGP for the respondents. CORAM : A.P. DESHPANDE & N.D. DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE : 12TH JANUARY, 2010. ORAL ORDER :- 1] Petitions in this group are instituted by the Zilla Parishad, Beed, seeking direction against the State Government for release of money for 2 payment of compensation on account of acquisition of land of the respondents. According to the petitioner percolation tank had to be constructed under the Employment Guarantee Scheme and the Zilla Parishad was only implementing agency for the said scheme. As an implementing agency, the Zilla Parishad had acquired lands and the State Government was expected to make payment. As the State Government, did not make available the amount of compensation, the parties whose lands were acquired, proceeded against the properties held by the Zilla Parishad, which prompted the Zilla Parishad, to institute these writ petitions. Various interim orders have been passed from time to time in regard to payment. The learned counsel for the petitioner in all fairness submits that the writ petitions are rendered infructuous as during the pendency of the writ petitions, amounts are released by the State Government and made over to the claimants. 2] In the result, writ petitions stand disposed of as infructuous. [N.D. DESHPANDE,J.] [A.P. DESHPANDE.J.] Grt/-