IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-1742 of 2011 Date of Decision:20.5.2011 Satnam Singh and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. J.S. Chahal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Brar, A.A.G. Punjab. Mr. C.M. Munjal, Advocate for the complainant. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for pre-arrest bail in case FIR No.2 dated 2.1.2011 under Sections 452/323/326/379/148/149 IPC (Section 326 IPC added later on)Police Station Division No.4, Ludhiana City. Vide order of even date passed in Crl. M. No.9296-M of 2011, the FIR in question has already been quashed on the basis of compromise. As such, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 20.5.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE