M^ ^ '^ -i 2 s- L^W t-c^/Q^ lN^.]IS»SIiTg_ADM^IS^^^^g_^]l^B^^L^2«JMlLP.USili£l^l^ OA-HO A^l.OS' 1295 KU.HAHMAM,AQBD &BOUT 2Z. XB&RS, D/0 SHRI 1?IHTUHAM,OGGUs£'AKBlSH, 0/0 ASSISTAHT RiSQt$TI^R,S>IimS MD SOGIETIB^,MIPU&? DI STT s R1I PUE' (M .P.) * • «* . . • »•M^M5^ST -?s- l)Sy&TE OS* K1DKI& PRsLDBSHA THROUaH s S^GRaTtRY, EOONOMIGS & INBTJSTRIBS D3PT2. ·TO.La.BH BH.i'yi.N,BHO?AL(K.P.)* ;)&BGISTR&R, 'FIHMS &ND SOC££TIBS MDIia PK1BSSK, BHOPA.L(M<fc.) • 5)A,SSISTAHT RlSGISTtAR, PIRMS AND SOGIETIBS, DISTTs RAIPUK(M.P.)• ^S£2^fiIT§^ &ffAILS OW A.PPLIGATIOI, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Ptetition fSl No. 1093 of 2005 Petitioner Ku. Narmada Versus Respondents State of Madhya Chhattisgarh) & others Rradesli (aow (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) None for the petitioner. Shri N. N. Roy, P&nel Lawyer for fhe respondents/State, ORDBRtoralt ( Piassed on fhis 9th day of November, 2009) 1. 2. The matter is caUed for hearing twice. On both fhe occasions none appears nor any representation is inade on behalf of fhe petitioner. The petitioner may not be iaterested ia prosecutmg the inatter. In view of the forcgoing, the petition is disiaissed for want of prosecution, A eopy ofthis order shall be sent to the petitioner forthwith, Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur