\“\ :r_‘,, HIGH COURT OF CHHAT’I‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR M.A. No. 581 of2005 Appellants 1. Smt. Anita KapilSharma, widow of Harishchandra Kapil, aged about 45‘ years, Ocupa11'on — House wife. 2. Ku. Alankrita D/o Late Harischandra Kapil, ag€d about 13 years. 3. Ayush S/o Harischamh‘a Kapil, aged about 8 years. Applicant No. 2 and 3 am represented by legal Guardiall applicmlt No. 1, Smt. Anita Kapil. All am reeident of Village ~ Kasaxidih — Durg, Tahsil and District- Durg (C.G.). Versus Respondents 1. Murat Singh S/o Hari Singh Dangi, Occupation’ Truck Driver,» R/ o Bilaspur Tmnsport Company, Hixapur, Ring Road No.2, Raipur, Tahsil and District— Raipur (C.G.). 2‘ Bhajan Singh, Occupation— Truck Owner, R/o H.R.C. Dewas Naka, Indore (MR) The National Insurance Co. Ltd. Divisional Odice, Indore, Division No. 1, Dr. Saiju Prasad Marg, Gokul Das Agaiwal Building Indore, Through: Divisional Manager, Divisional O$ce, Power House Bhjlai, Tahsil and District— Durg (C.G.). DB: Hon’ble Shri Justice S. R. Nayak, C.J. 85 Hon’ble Shri Justice San'sh K. Agnihotxi, J. Mr. S. C. Velma, Advocate, for the appellants. ORAL ORDER ( 1“ December 2005) 1. This is a claimants’ appeal. The only contention of learned counsel for the appellants is that though it is satisfhctmily proved that the gross income of the deceased was Rs: 6962/ -'\ per month, the Tribunal for the purpose of assessing loss of dependency took the income of the deceased as Rs. 5844l- per month, and therefore, a? not be sustained. The contention of leanled counseL is not acceptable to us. The M .A.C.T. while assessing loss of an allow permissible deductions Mun the gross y law. Them is no merit in the appeal. The appea1 is therefore dismissed. the order can dependency c salary. This position is well settled b Sdl- Chief Justice Judge \ \ \