CRM-M-32331-2011 (O&M) [ 1 ] :::::::: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32331-2011 (O&M) Date of decision:31.10.2011 Manpreet Kaur ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. GPS Bal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This is a petition for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in a case registered vide FIR No.61 dated 23.05.2011, under Sections 302, 201, 34 of IPC at Police Station Phase-I, Mohali. According to the case of the prosecution, Barleen Kaur, minor daughter of Manmohan Singh (deceased) woke up at midnight and heard voices in the kitchen. She had found that her aunt/Massi Baljit Kaur was not present on the sofa set where she slept during night. She secretly went in the kitchen and found that her mother Manpreet Kaur and aunt/Massi Baljit Kaur were preparing something in the kitchen in the glass, poured cold drink and then both of them went to the room of her father Manmohan Singh and administered the said drink to him. Lateron, she found that her mother and her aunt/Massi wrote something on a piece of paper in the drawing room and after consulting each other, they kept the said writing under the bedding/bister of her father. It is also alleged that her father was totally illiterate person. The deceased Manmohan Singh is alleged to have died because of poison. Baljit Kaur had earlier applied for bail which was dismissed by this Court on 18.08.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner CRM-M-32331-2011 (O&M) [ 2 ] :::::::: has been falsely implicated in this case, whereas the allegation against her is that she had committed the murder of her husband due to her extra-marital relations. The learned Court below, while dismissing the bail application, has also observed that the petitioner has confessed her guilt during telephonic conversation with her paramour and the suicide note also indicates that it was not a natural death, which requires custodial interrogation of the petitioner. In view thereof, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby dismissed. October 31, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE