IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13907 of 2009 NIRMAL SAH, Son of Late Bhasa Ram Sah, resident of Village- Bihari Colony, P.S. Bhangaha, Anchal-Mainatand, District-West Champaran.....................................................................Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, West Champaran. 3. The Land Reforms Dy. Collector, Narkatiaganj, District- West Champaran. 4. The Circle Officer, Anchal-Mainatand, District- West Champaran. .................Respondents. ----------- 2. 26.10.2009. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is aggrieved by the orders contained in Annexures- 5, 6 and 7 whereunder mutation of the lands in question has been allowed in favour of the respondent no.5. Counsel for the petitioner assailed the three orders on the ground that mutation has been allowed in favour of respondent no.5 without appreciating the fact that his vendor was not the owner/raiyat of the lands in question and he had no authority to execute the sale deed as from the revenue record maintained by the authorities, it is evident, that the said vendor had no connection with the lands in question which is evident from the information received from the Revenue authority of Mainatand Anchal in the district of West Champaran contained in Annexure-8 to this application. Let the petitioner approach the Collector of the district and invite his attention to the information received over Annexure-8 from the Anchal authority and if the Collector is 2 satisfied that the vendor of Respondent No. 5 was not title holder of the lands in question then the Collector, Respondent No. 5 should consider the desirability to recall the orders contained in Annexures 5, 6 and 7 as early as possible in any case within three months from the date of receipt of the petition annexing a copy of this order. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. U.K. (V.N.Sinha,J)