IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2589 of 2007 ***** SMT. NUTAN DEVI, WIFE OF SRI RAM EKBAL RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O.-HATTA, P.S. PIER, BANDRA, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR…….PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. S. JALJA, SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA, 3. SRI JAIRAM LAL MINA, COMMISSIONER, TIRHUT COMMISSIONARY, AT MUZAFFARPUR, 4. SRI BINAY KUMAR, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUZAFFARPUR. 5. MUZAFFARPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MUZAFFARPUR, THROUGH THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, MUZAFFARPUR. 6. SMT. BIMLA TULSIYAN, MAYOR, MUZAFFARPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MUZAFFARPUR, 7. SRI HARIHAR PRASAD SINGH, MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, MUZAFFARPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MUZAFFARPUR. 8. SRI BISHWAMOHAN MISHRA, ADDL. MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, MUZAFFARPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MUZAFFARPUR. 9. SRI KAUSHAL KISHORE VERMA, ADDL. MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, MUZAFFARPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MUZAFFARPUR. 10. SRI RAJ NARAIN SINGH, ACCOUNT FINANCE CONTROLLER, MUZAFFARPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & MRDA, MUZAFFARPUR. 11. MUZAFFARPUR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (DEFUNCT) THROUGH SHRI HARIHAR PRASAD SINGH ITS VICE-CHAIRMAN. 12. SHRI HARIHAR PRASAD SINGH, VICE CHAIRMAN, MUZAFFARPUR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (DEFUNCT), MUZAFFARPUR. 13. THE BANDRA NUNFARA SRAMIK SAHYOG SAMITI LTD., MARAUL/BANDRA, P.S. PIER, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY SMT. INDRASAN RAI, WIFE OF SRI SHIVA SHANKAR RAI, 2 RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - MURAUL/BANDRA, P.S. PIER, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. 14. SRI RAMANAND THAKUR, SON OF LATE BRAHMDEO THAKUR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-PATHSARA, P.S. PIER, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR….OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 4. 26.3.2010. Heard Mr. D.K. Sinha, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Anjani Kumar Sharan, learned counsel for the State, Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel along with Mr. Awadhesh Kumar for the Muzaffarpur Municipal Corporation and Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, learned counsel for Muzaffarpur Regional Development Authority. The present application for contempt has been filed on the foundation that the order dated 20.11.2006 passed in CWJC No. 13933 of 2006 by the Division Bench of this Court has not yet been complied with. Be it noted, this Court while disposing of the writ petition has directed as follows:- “The respondent No.3 the Muzaffarpur Regional Development Authority through the Secretary, Muzaffarpur Regional Development Authority, Bihar, is directed to look into and take appropriate prompt decision with regard to the representation that is proposed to be filed within a period of two weeks from today. The respondent no.3 is further directed to look into and take expeditious decision but not later than 5 3 months from today. With this observation, this application shall stand disposed of.” Having heard learned counsels for the parties it is directed that all efforts shall be made by the State and its functionaries to give effect to the aforesaid directions by end of July, 2010. With the aforesaid direction, the present proceeding for contempt, stands dropped. The MJC is accordingly disposed of. Dilip ( Dipak Misra, C.J. ) ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J. )