IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 875 of 2003 Suresh Madhav Chaudhari and Ors. .. Appellants V/s Sakharam Vitthal Patil and Ors...Respondents Ms Ashwini Hosing i/b A.V.Chatuphule for Appellant None for the Respondent CORAM:S.R.SATHE,J. DATED;1st August 2007 P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Appellant. 2. Suit for possession alleging that the defendant has made encroachment was filed by the plaintiff but the trial Court came to the conclusion that the plaintiff has failed to prove the alleged encroachment and consequently dismissed the same. The First Appellate Court also held accordingly. There is nothing on record to show that concurrent finding of fact given by the Courts below is perverse. No necessity to interfere with the order. No substantial question of law involved in the matter. Hence the appeal is dismissed in limine. (S.R.SATHE, J.)