IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.10140 of 2011 Date of Decision:- 01.06.2011 Gurcharan Singh ....Petitioner(s) vs. Punjab State Warehousing Corporation and another ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH *** Present:- Mr.Amit Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (Oral) It is the contention of the counsel for the petitioner that initially recovery to the tune of ` 3,17,055/- was ordered by the Appointing Authority while imposing a punishment on the petitioner. Against the said order, the petitioner preferred an appeal. The Appellate Authority partly allowed the appeal of the petitioner vide order dated 27.1.2011 (Annexure P-5) wherein an amount of ` 3,10,953/- which was recovered from the petitioner in pursuance of the order of punishment, was ordered to be refunded. Despite the said order having been passed, till date no refund has been made to the petitioner. Claiming the refund of the said amount, the petitioner has served a legal notice dated 4.4.2011 (Annexure P-6) but the same has not been considered and decided nor has the order as passed by the Appellate Authority complied with. If that be so, without going into the merits of the case or commenting thereon, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Managing Director, Punjab State Warehousing C.W.P.No.10140 of 2011 -2- Corporation-respondent No.2 to consider and decide the legal notice dated 4.4.2011 (Annexure P-6) served by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The refund amounting to ` 3,10,953/-, if , as claimed and ordered by the Appellate Authority is found to be correct, the same be disbursed to the petitioner within a further period of one week. June 01, 2011 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) poonam JUDGE