1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.11.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.BASHA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petition (MD)No.12677 of 2011 A.S.M.Kumar @ S.Muthukumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai. ... Respondents Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of mandamus directing the respondents to implement the maintenance work and install recreational equipments and sodium lamps and ensure the protection of the Public Park users during the late evening hours . For Petitioner : Mr.R.Senthilkumar For Respondent No.1 : Mr.R.Anandharaj, Government Advocate. For Respondent No.2 : Mr.M.Ravishankar O R D E R [Order of the Court was made BY K.N.BASHA, J] Mr.R.Anandharaj, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for Respondent No.1 and Mr.M.Raishankar, learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent Corporation. By mutual consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing at the time of admission itself. 2.The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition seeking for a direction to respondents to implement the maintenance work and install recreational equipments and sodium lamps in Park Ground at LIG Colony, Anna Nagar, Madurai, and ensure protection of the Public Park users during the late evening hours. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 27.06.2011, seeking for the relief of providing Sodim Vapour Lamps in Anna Nagar Children's Park. 4.Heard the learned Government Advocate appearing for respondent No.1 and the learned Standing Counsel for the Madurai Municipal Corporation, the 2nd respondent herein, on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner would be satisfied thatif a direction is given to the 2nd respondent to consider his representation, dated 27.06.2011, this Court, without going into the merits of the representation of the petitioner, is constrained to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 27.06.2011, in the light of the reply, dated 08.08.2011, given by the 2nd respondent, by affording an opportunity to the petitioner and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall furnish a copy of his representation, dated 27.06.2011, along with a copy of this order, again to the 2nd respondent, within ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. 6.With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(T&P) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To: 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai +One cC to Mr.R.Senthilkumar, Advocate, SR.No.38538 gb rl/4 c- 16.11.2011 ORDER IN WP(MD)No.12677 of 2011 Dated:09.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/