IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27056 of 2009 RAVISH KUMAR @ VISHAL KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 10.09.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner has approached this court seeking regular bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Arms Act. It is alleged that when the chase was offered the petitioner discarded the arms/ammunition from his possession and managed to escape. It is alleged that one pistol and 04 live cartridges were thus recovered lying on the road. From the impugned order, it appears that petitioner carried criminal antecedents. Having regard to that aspect, the matter was adjourned earlier under order dated 19.08.2009. It is contended that petitioner is in custody since 28.01.2009. In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the ACJM, Patna City in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case no. 23/09, G.R. No. 190/09 subject to the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the 2 petitioner. (ii) Petitioner shall continue to appear before the officer-in-charge of the Fatuha P.S. or any officer-in-charge of the said police station once in a month for a period of 05 months from the date of his release. In case of default in such appearance before the officer-in-charge, same shall be promptly reported to the trial court/ court in seisin of the case, whereafter it shall be open to the trial court to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)