CM No.7137-CI-2008 and - 1 - RFA No.3557 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CM No.7137-CI-2008 and RFA No.3557 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION: 19.3.2009 **** Union Territory Chandigarh through Land Acquisition Collector, Sector 17, Chandigarh. . . . . Appellant VS. Bhupinder Singh . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN **** Present: Mrs.Lisa Gill, Additional Standing Counsel for UT./appellant. Mr.P.C. Dhiman, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2.. **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J.(ORAL) As per the office report, Respondents No.3 and 7 have died. Respondents No.4 and 6 are not found residing at the given addresses. Respondent No.5 has been duly served. No one has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.5, therefore, respondent No.5 is proceeded against ex parte. At this state, learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 submits that the present appeal is squarely covered by the CM No.7137-CI-2008 and - 2 - RFA No.3557 of 2008 decision of this Court in the case RFA No.3921 of 2007 tiled as “Arunash Chander Kaushik and Others Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh” passed by Hon’ble Mr.Justice Rajesh Bindal on 10.2.2009. Learned counsel for the appellant also accepts this fact. Both the parties are ad idem that the present appeal is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case “Arunash Chander Kaushik and Others Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh” (supra). In view of the above, delay of 19 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. However, the present appeal is disposed of in terms of the order passed in RFA No.3921 of 2007 tiled as “Arunash Chander Kaushik and Others Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh”. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) March 19, 2009 JUDGE vivek