v: HIGHCOURTOF CHHATTISGARH, BtLASPUR PETITIONER ¥ 2. 3. M 5. W.P. (St No. 7071 of2007 1. Sonu Raiu Satiu, age about 58 years, Assistant Teache^, ,S./ o Shri Punit Ram Sahu, Middle School Katalbord, Block-Kurud, District Dhamtari(CG) Krishna Kuiiiar Sahu, Age about 52 years, Assistaut Teacher s/o Late Shri Sagar Ram Satiu, Middle School Darba, Block Kurud, District Dhamtari(CG) Madan Lal Vishwakanna, age abovtt 57 years, Assistailt Teacher, s/o Late Shri Vrmdavan Vishwkarma Pruaaiy School Chipandih, Block Abhaiipur, Distnct Raipur(CG) Sewa Ratn Pall age about 56 years, Assistant Teacher s/o Shri Dauvarain PaB Govt. F'rimaiy School Dhenfha Bl&ck Kiirud, District Dhamtari(CG) . Narayan Siagh Sahu, Age about 52 years, Assistant Teacher s/o Shri Vishal Ram Sahu Govt. Prunaiy School Loharshi Block Dhanitari, District Dhamtari(CG) Kashi Ram Sahu, Age about 57 yeacs, Assistant Teacher, s/o Shri Eitwari Ram. Sahu, Govt. Prunaiy School Korra Block-Kurud, District Dhamtari(CGj Rameshwar Rao Jadhaw Age about 56 years, Assistan.t Teacher s/o Stiri Dauji Rao Jadhaw, Govt. Giris Middle School Kharenga Block Dhauitari, District Dhamtari(CG) Narrottram Nimialkar Age about 52 years, Assistaat Teacher, s/o Shri Anjor Ram.. Nirm.alkar Middle School Bagdehi, Block-Kurud, DistrictDhamtari(CG) Gopal Sahu, age about 56 years, Assistant Teacher, s/o Late Shri Shiv Dayal Sahu, Govt. Primary School Around (Li) Block Dhaiatari, District Dham.tari(eG) Bhola Nath Yadav age about 52 years, Assistant Teacher s/o Late SIu-i Hardev Ram Yadav Govt. 7. ^ff^%Tififra ^r£i£?ffi-te'^Ef?ffns ^ W.P. (§)No.7071/2007 b "K' ^: Prunaiy School Debhar, Block Dhamtari, District Dhamtari(CG) 11. Dmeshawar Singti Gautam, age about 59 years, Assistaiit Teacher s/o Late Shri Kaliram Gautam Grovt. Priiaary School Hafkesbar Block Dhauitari, District Dhamtari(CG) 12. Sonau Raca Dhruw age about 54 year, Assistant Teacher s/o Late Shri Narsinghram Dhinw Govt. New Girls Hr. School Dharutari, Block Dhamtari, Distriet Dhamtari(CG) 13. Anirudh Siagh, age about 54 years, Assistaiit Teaclier s/o Late Shri Rupuraia Sahu, Govt. Girls Piimary School Daaitola, Block Dhamtari, District Dham.tarifCG) 14. TUak Ram Patel age about 54 years, Assistant Teacher s/o Late Shri Alakh Ram Patel Govt. Pnmaiy School Khisora Block Magarload, District Dham.tari(CG) 15. Ramadliar Dewaugan aged about 53 years, Assistant Teacher s/o Shri Kartik Ram. Dewangan Govt. Primaiy School Kapalpliondi Block Magarload, Distaict Dhain.tari(CG) 16. Uday Ram Saliu age about 51 years, Assistant Teacher s/o Shri Laxman.SBighSaIiu, Middle School " Am.adi, Block Dhamtari, District Dhamtari(CG) Versus 1 State Govt.of CIihattisgarh, Through The Secretaiy, Tribal & Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Distnct Raipur (C.G.) 2 District Education Officer, District Raipur/Dhaintari 3. Block Education Officer, Kurud/Magarload/ Dhauitari 4. Treasury, Acco'uiits & Peasion, Distnct Raipur/ Dhanitari. WRITPETITION UND1BRARTICLE 226 OIi-THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA '/ ,0 W.P.(fi)No.7071/2007 ^ Appeatance: Shri Soinkant Venna, Couiisel for the petitioners, Ms. Suoita Jaia, Paael Lawyer for fhe State on advaace copy. ORALORDER (28.11.2007) SUNILKUMAR, SmHA, J Heard. Leamed couusel for the petiitioners subiaits fhat fhe issue involved ia the case is as to whether fhe petitioners are entifled to icgular pay scale w.e.f. fhe date of initial appoiutineiit or froiu fhe date of coiupletioa of probation period. He subinits fhat fhe issue iavolved herein was considered by the Madllya Pradesh State Admiaistrative Tribiuial, Jabalpur m O.A. No.2745/89 (Madhukaat Yadu and 56 ofhers Vs. State of M.P. aiid others), wherein, it was held fhat the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date ofitUtial appouitinent. The inatter was taken up to fhe Hon'ble Supreine Court iii Special Leave Petition (CiviljNo.6892/93. The said petition was disinissed by the Hon'ble Supreine Court upholdiag fhe decision of the Tribunal to fhe effect fhat fhe Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entiUed to regular pay scale from fhe date ofinitial appouittnent. Leamed counsel for the petitioners further subnuts that tliis Court, while considering the same issue in Rain Kumar Sahu aad ofhers Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh aad another (W.P.(S) No.813 of 2007) by order dated 12.2.2007, has granted regular pay scale w.e.f. fhe date ofmitial appointment. Learaed counselfor the paTtiesjointly subruits fhat fhis case is squarcly covered by fhe decision of this Court in fhe case of Ram Kuiaar Sahu aad auofher (supra). In view of that, tiiis petition is allowed ia fhe same terms. However, fhis order shaU be subject to aU verifications niade by fhe State regarding facts pleaded ia the petition. Sd/- SunaKumar Judge Smba ^iMMTS.