IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. A. No.302-MA of 2008 (O & M) Date of Decision: September 08, 2011 Gurdev Singh .....APPLICANT(S) VERSUS Sarbdaman Singh @ Sarban Singh & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. R.S. Rangpuri, Advocate, for the applicant. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition is directed against judgment of acquittal dated 5.5.2008 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Muktsar. The respondents have been acquitted of the charge under Sections 379, 411, 148, 149 IPC. 2. Allegation made in the complaint is to the effect that Sun Flower crop had been cultivated on land measuring 18 kanal 18 marlas by the complainant. Because the respondents wanted to dis-possess the complainant, Sun Flower crop was plucked and distributed among them. Crl. Misc. A. No.302-MA of 2009 [2] 3. Acquittal has been recorded on the ground that the civil suit instituted by the complainant in regard to the land had been dismissed. The application filed by the applicant under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC was also dismissed. It has also been found as a matter of fact that the mutation which the complainant relied so as to set up his possession, had been set aside by the Financial Commissioner. 4. It has further been held that the complainant was neither found to be the owner of the disputed land nor in possession. Other than that, the complainant did not examine eye-witness Harnek Singh to support his allegation. 5. The judgment of acquittal has been recorded on the basis of relevant material and evidence. In such circumstances, no interference is called for. 6. The application/ petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) September 08, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?