IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 19TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 4694 of 2008(H) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ ARAVINDAKSHA KAIMAL, CHIRATHARA HOUSE KARUMADY P.O., AMBALAPUZHA TALUK ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT NOW RESIDING AT 'AJANTHA' MATHILBHAGOM, THIRUVALLA P.O. PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW SRI.SATHISH NINAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER ALAPPUZHA. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, AMBALAPUZHA TALUK AMBALAPUZHA. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KARUMADY AMBALAPUZHA. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =================== W.P.(C) NO.4694 OF 2008 H =========================== Dated this the 8 th day of February, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext.P1. Though Ext.P1 has been described as a notice, this requires the petitioner to demolish a pathway and restore land into its original position. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has not been issued any notice before Ext.P1 was issued. It is also not stated that the petitioner was issued any notice before issuing the notice. 2. In view of this, I direct that Ext.P1 shall be treated as show cause notice and it will be open to the petitioner to file his objections to Ext.P1. This the petitioner shall do within two weeks from today and thereafter, the 3 rd respondent shall re-consider the WPC 4694/08 :2 : matter in the light of the reply that the petitioner files and pass fresh orders in the matter, with notice to the petitioner. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp