IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4680 of 2010 1. NANDJEE CHOUBEY S/O SRI RAM NAGINA CHOUBEY R/O VILL.- ANDAUR, P.S.- KOCHAS, DISTT.- ROHTAS AT SASARAM (BIHAR) Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION BUDHA MARG, PATNA 4. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION PATNA DIVISION, NEAR MILLAR HIGH SCHOOL, PATNA 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER ROHTAS AT SASARAM ----------- For the Petitioner :- M/S. J. P. Shukla, Sr. Advocate & Shambhu Nath Choubey. For the State :- Mr. Sunil Kumar Mandal, S.C. XXIV Dr. A. Shankar, A.C. to S. C. XXIV ---- 2 07/01/2011 Having heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State, prima facie, this Court is not convinced that there is illegality which emerges from the impugned order contained in annexure- 25. However, there is vehemence in the submission of the learned counsel that some of those aspects which have now been brought on record and were produced before the 3 Member Committee, were not considered. Whether it is an afterthought or based on legal advise is - 2 - not known, but if it is so, let the petitioner take his chance by bringing those facts before the three Member Committee by filing an application with specific assertion and material. It will pass appropriate order if the infirmities are found to be true or if those facts are correct, otherwise Annexure-25 will continue to occupy the field. This writ application is disposed of with the observation aforesaid. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)