\\§t‘» HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT B§LASPUR Writ Petition Na. 3938 of 1995 Petitioners 1. Jagdish Phadnavees, son of Shri Ramkrishna Phadnavees, aged 29 years, AR. Dish Centre, Manav Mandir -Chowk‘ Cinema Line, Rajnandgaon. Mohd. Elias Asharfi, son of Mohd. lsma‘i! Asharfi, aged 25 years, Near Tulsipur Railway Crossing, Rainandgaon. Harjeet Singh Chabda, son of S. Chatar Singh Chabda, aged 26 years, Lucky dish Centre, Cio Harmendra Singh Wadhwa, Station Para, Ward No. 11, Rainandgaon Mohd. Rustam, son of Guiam Gouri, aged 30 years, Indira Nagar, Rajnandgaon. S. Chaiar Singh Chabda, son of Shri G. Harnam Singh Chabda, aged 55 years, Gurunanak Deoji Dish Centre, Baidevbagh, Ward No. 14, Rajnandgaon. Gautam Kotadia, son of Late Premraj Kotadia, aged 36 years, Gudaku Lane, Rajnandgaon. Jethanand Bhatia, son of Shri Tuisidas Bhatia, aged 55 years, Basantpur, Rajnandgaon. Ajay Gyanchandani, son of Late Bishandas Gyanchandani, aged 25 years, New Civil Lines, Rajnandgaon. Mohan Hinduja, son of Shri Hudraj, aged 24 years, Sahdev Nagar, Rajnandgaon. Vijay Anand Soni, son of Late Hazari Soni, aged 28 years, Brahmanpara College Road, Rajnandgaon. 10. Raghuveer ,Singh Bhatia, son of Trilochan Sing‘n Bhatia, aged 35 Kailash Nagar, Santosh Bhafna, son of Late Poonamohandji Bhafna, aged 50 years, Wardhman Nagar, Rajnandgaon. Ramesh Kumar Lunia, son of Late Champalalji Lunia, aged 35 years, Markapara, Rajnandgaon. years, Rajnanclgaon. 11. 12. 13. , Respondents 1 . 2. 3. @D Versus ‘I. Union of India through the Secretary. Department Communicaticn, New Delhi. Post Master General, Raipur Region, Raipur. Head Post Master, Head Post Office. Rajnandgaon. WRIT PETiTiON UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 OF THE CONSTITUTIGN OF INDIA (SB: Hon‘ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) None appears for the petitioners. Shri S.K. Beriwai, Standing ccunsei for the respondents. O R D E ' {Passed on this 2" day of August, 2907) The matter is caiied for hearing iw‘rce. On both occasions. none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioners. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. In View of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. The Registry is directed to send a certihed copy of this order to the petitioners forthwith. ff]. Sdl SAT ISH K. AGNtktOTRI Judge U