IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 1ST AUGUST 2011 / 10TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 20830 of 2011(C) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- V.ANEESHKUMAR,S/O.B.VIJAYAN,AGED 25 YEARS, B.SC. ZOOLOGY (5TH SEMESTER) (FINAL YEAR) STUDENT,(DISMISSED),GOVT.MAHARAJAS COLLEGE, HEAD POST OFFICE, ERNAKULAM AND RESIDING AT CHAKKUPURAYIL VEEDU, ALAKUZHY,KURA P.O, KOTTARAKKARA 691 557. BY ADV. SRI.N.UNNIKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY AND THE CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF ADJUDICATION OF STUDENTS GRIEVANCES, M.G UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM 686 560. 2. THE PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT MAHARAJAS COLLEGE, HEAD POST OFFICE, ERNAKULAM - 11. 3. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. R1 BY ADV. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC., MG. UTY. R2 & R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.M.R. RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 20830/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF ORDER NO.B6-1759/2010 DATED 14/06/2011. P2: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B6-1759/2010-11 DATED 20/06/2011. P3: COPY LETTER DATED 20/04/2011 SUBMITTED BY SHRI.SAJEEVAN R. P4: COPY OF LETTER DATED 20/04/2011 SUBMITTED BY SRI.RAJESH K. P5: COPY OF LETTER DATED 20/04/2011 SUBMITTED BY SARANYA. P6: COPY OF LETTER DTD. 20/04/2011 SUBMITTED BY SHIYAS SHAHEER P7: COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 22/06/2011. P8: COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 28/06/2011. P9: COPY OF APPEAL DATED 15/07/2011 P10: COPY OF MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY STUDENTS CODE OF CONDUCT RULE, 2005. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).20830/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 1st day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner was a Degree student in the Maharajas College, Ernakulam. After keeping him under suspension for two spells of time, by Ext.P2 order dated 20.6.2011, he was dismissed from the College. According to the petitioner, invoking the provisions of the University statutes, he filed Ext.P9 appeal before the Board of Adjudication of Students Grievances, the Chairman of which is the Vice Chancellor of the University. Orders have not been passed on the appeal. It is in these circumstances, the writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P2. 2. In my view, since the statutory authority is ceased of the appeal filed by the petitioner, it is not necessary or desirable for this Court to examine the merits of the contentions raised or pronounce pronouncement on the same. 3. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing that the first respondent will deal with Ext.P9 appeal filed by the petitioner in W.P.(C).20830/11 2 accordance with law, and with notice to the parties concerned. This the first respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs