T 3mm 3mm g l @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH w.P.(S) No. I2”? /2o1¢ PETITIONER / Smt. Sadhna Selat W/o Shri Niraj Kumar Selat, Aged about 46 years, Occupation — Lecturer, Govt. Hir. Sec. School J. P. Nagar Camp — 2 Bhilai Distt. Durg (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through — The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer District Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR @ WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 1247 OF 2011 PETiTlONER Smi‘ Sadhna Semt Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon‘bie Shri Sattsh K. Agnihotri, Jt Present z- Shri Vipin Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Dye Advocate General for the State/ ’ respondents. ORDER IORAL) ”{Passed on this 7m day of March, 201 1) Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel appearing for the petltioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to benefit of two advance increments on account of the fact that the petitioner has passed B.Ed. examination on 20.07.1984 before entering into the service ie on 19.02.1987, at her own cost. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present case is no longer res integra, as the same has been considered and decided by the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena v. State of MP. & Ors.’ as well as by this Court in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj v. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another2 and Gopesh Kumar Verma v. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another? Learned counsel further submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision as aforestated. Thus, the petitioner may ‘2009 (iii) MPJR (so) 59 2 zoos (ii) MPJR—co s6 _ tin/Pia) Normso or2oos 02% «a .4 be permitted to make a {epresentation to decide her case in the light of aforestated decisions, subiect to verification of the facts asto whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed. certificate on her own expenses before entering into service. Learned counsei appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same wiii be considered and decided, in accordance with iew and in the light of the decisions of the $iipreme Court in Asha Saxena (supra), within a period of {our weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. in view of foregoing, according to the teamed counsei appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adiudication. Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of. V /r,\,,m ,» - ,7/ ..... / 1d,- Amit 7.