1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4395 OF 2009 1.Eknath S/o.Sakharam Pawar, Age-24 years, Occu-Agriculturist, R/o.Dahij Tanda, Wadwani, Tq.Wadwani, Dist. Beed 2. Gorakh S/o.Sakharam Pawar, Age-21 years, Occu-Agriculturist, R/o.Dahij Tanda, Wadwani, Tq.Wadwani, Dist. Beed APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra, Through Police Station, Wadwani, Dist. Beed RESPONDENT Mr.S.J.Salunkhe, learned counsel for applicants. Mrs.Y.M.Kshirsagar, learned APP for respondent State. (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 18/01/2010 PER COURT : 1. By the present application, the applicants have approached this Court for their release on regular bail in connection with CR No. 44/2009 registered in Wadwani Police Station of Dist. Beed on 21/11/2009 on the complaint of one Janabai Eknath Pawar, wife of first applicant, and the applicant no.2 who is the brother in law of 2 the victim complainant. Offence is registered u/s. 498-A, 307, 504 r/w.34 of IPC, in which these applicants came to be arrested on 21/11/2009 about the incident occurred on 17/11/2009. 2. There is an allegation in the complaint that there was harassment to the victim complainant Janabai on the count of demand of dowry to start a new business of hotel and as the parents of the complainant are unable to satisfy this demand, some bottle containing poisonous substance was brought by applicant no.2 and administered by applicant no.1. Soon after the incident, the complainant victim was admitted in the hospital where she regain consciousness on 19/11/2009. It appears that statement of the witnesses came to be recorded about the same incident. The investigation is over and charge-sheet is filed on 13/01/2010 in the Court of J.M.F.C. Wadwani. Even though there are allegations of administering the poisonous substance, the material collected from the body of the victim was sent for chemical test. Even though the charge sheet is filed, the CA report is not collected nor produced alongwith the charge sheet to support the allegations against these applicants. 3. Considering the fact that now the investigation is over, and the complainant is residing with her parents, then there are no chances of tampering the evidence of complainant and her close relatives. In the premise, it is not necessary to detain the applicants for uncertain period behind the bars. Case is made out to enlarge the applicants 3 on bail. Hence order : O R D E R 1. Application is allowed. 2. Applicants be released on bail on furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.20,000/- each and on executing PR bond in the like amount. 3. After released on bail, applicants not to tamper with the witnesses of prosecution and not to contact the complainant. 4. Application stands disposed of accordingly. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/JAN 2010/cri.appl.4395-09