f^]^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCG> WRITPETITION N0. 2lt65^ /2006 Dasru Ram Yadav, aged about 36 years; son of Shri Latel Ram Yadav, occupation - service, •Assistant Cook, (Under Daily Wages) Public Works Department, Sub Division No.l, Bilaspur (C.G.) A^ .°^i>-" ^yy i-r-r'' .&'•*-' C';E .^rttMM/.r^.. ^^'r'^t^' W/'- ^v^ -'J£I A^ -c' 4.^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Public Works, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^'2. Engineer-in-Chi-ef, Public Works Department, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Bilaspur Trt B^^SPUR Division, Distt. BilasRur (C.G.) ^ 4. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division No.l, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) .-5. Sub Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Sub Division Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2J6/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. a», s^ XI-HC-78 an^T^TR-ii'* craTsn^TgiHw <TT(Rfl sh+11<sh 3^''qFI1?ra', aiTn'M'is, [sx'iiuy ^^^...^^ 200^ 3)1^1 4^* (yiI^q^iT) STgrwaf^TW^T 11-8-2006 tHat Mr. A.N. Bhakta, counsel Mc. Sumesh Bayqj, 6ovt advance copy. Heard both the counsel. By this writ petition under| the petitioner has proyed for a his services after taking into con; The petitioner's case is Cook in the category of Class-I\j without any interruption, the pe^ The erstwhile Stste of Madhya employees who ore working on] considered for regularisation and asked for details and particuiars daily wa9C bosis for the purpose^ that, c list Annexure P-2 date| petitioner's name has been representotions, the case of th^ decided even thou9h the persons , Therefore, leorned counse brin9 this anomaly to the notice ailowed to make a detailed rei tpr the petitioner. Advocate for the State/respondents, on )-;,:^- .t. •U-<:- ?£•'. <t>i.!itci''fl-< ><it<cfTirte<^t'<Ri<^i<. ^arf^Tsn^T Article 226/227 of the Constitutjon of India, lirsction to the rsspondents for regularizing ideration his seniority. he wos employed on daily woge basis as a emptoyee prior to 31-12-1988 and till ^fewJ itioner is regularly workin9 on the said post. |Pradesh took a decision that the daily wage or before ,31st December, 1988 shall be respondent No.3 vide order dated 28-4-2004 ^f the empioyees/workers who are working on of their regularisation and in pursuance of ld 28-7-2004 wos submitted in which the sh|own at serioi No.28. In spite of the petitioner for r'egularisation is not bein9 junior to him have been regularized. for the petitioner submits that in order to |of respondent No,3, the petitioner may be pre^entation to respondent No.3 and respondent P.T.O. R XI-HC-78 sn^rqiTf^iN; (KTT 3TI^?T giffR? IL <- S'oriia •^f fh ^ (TP-T^fT ai*TT«ti s^^iraRpr, ®TTlw'i6,(sicii^y,< •^/- ^n: 200^ 3nit?r'ra^T ('^ig^tT) ?RTTWHf?tr31I^?T M No.3 be directed to decide the the Stste/respondents has no ob|j Having heard learned eoun|sel and circumstonces of the case artd the case, the request made by and reasonable. Therefore, th|e representation raisin9 ai! his gri) and its annexures to respond4nt respondent No.3 is directed to fn»m the date of its receipt petitioner, in an objective mannerj, With the directiona oforedsnd Parties are entitied for cel +i'i)Ii-i4)-f wRffiftec^ttezR: ^srf^ffail^T same, to which learned counsel appearin9 for jection. i|sel for the parties, having regard to the facts without expressing any opinion on merit of 4arned counsel for the petitioner is just, fair petitioner is allowed to make a detoiled svances annexing a copy of the writ petstion No.3 within ten days from todoy and decide the representation within one month ^fter considenng the points raised by the i on its own merits, in occordance with law. ^md. the petition stands dispossd of. i|-tified copy'of this order. Sd/- L.C; Judge P.T.O. / i*