IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.2908 of 2011 Date of decision : 16.2.2011 Bhadur Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus Haryana Staff Selection Commission and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Jasbir Singh Mor, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The petitioners, who have been unsuccessful in the test conducted by the respondents to recruit drivers, make a grievance by simply saying that they were meritorious and lesser people have been selected. They say that they performed very well in the test but have not been selected. Allegations have also been levelled against respondent No.4 to say that money had been demanded by him to pass the petitioners in the driving test. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, I am of the opinion that the allegations made herein are too vague to warrant interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners having fought and lost cannot make any grievance of the selection in the absence of any sufficient material which could show that the process was not fair or proper. The petition lacking C.W.P.No.2908 of 2011 -2- these material particulars cannot be accepted. Dismissed. 16.2.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss