IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 143 of 2011. Date of Decision : May 2, 2011 Partap Singh … Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others. … Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Neeraj K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 3. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner in this petition is aggrieved since he has been replaced by the private respondent. The petitioner is PTA appointee and the private respondent is regular appointee. According to the petitioner, he can work only in the place/school where he was appointed, whereas the private respondent, being regular appointee, can work in any open vacancy. In case the petitioner can point out any suitable vacancy, where the private respondent is willing to be accommodated, the petitioner may point out the same before the second respondent along with willingness letter, in which case, the second respondent will take appropriate action within another one 2 month. In case the petitioner is otherwise eligible, he may be continued in the resultant vacancy till he is otherwise replaced by a regular recruitee. 2. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. May 2, 2011 (PK/Pankaj)