hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 221 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 778 OF 2009 Sunny Santan Vaz. ... Petitioner Versus MHADA and Others ... Respondents None for Petitioners. Mr. D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleader for R. No. 3. Mr. R.V. Govilkar for R. Nos. 4 to 6. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : MAY 03, 2010 P. C.: This court by its order dated 22.2.2010 pending the hearing and final disposal of the petition directed that the Petitioner be inducted in possession though the letter of allotment was in favour of Petitioner and Respondent Nos. 3 to 5. That possession is purely permissive and till the disposal of the Petition. The grievance of the Petitioner is that though the allotment letter is in the name of Petitioner and Respondent Nos. 3 to 5, the letter of possession does not indicate the said aspect. The order of this court is clear that the possession given is purely permissible pending the decision of the petition and subject to undertakings which the Petitioner has to give in terms of our order dated 22.2.2010. In the light of that no further clarification is required. Motion disposed of accordingly. (A.A. SAYED,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)