IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1425 of 2009 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (CABINET) VIGILANCE, BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE D.I.G OF POLICE (VIGILANCE) CABINET, BIHAR, PATNA null null 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (VIGILANCE) CABINET, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE ENQUIRY OFFICER, CABINET (VIGILANCE) DEPTT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. ------------Respondents-Appellants. Versus KARYANAND SINGH S/O BHARAT PRASAD SINGH R/O VILL. AMARPUR, P.S. SURYAGARH, DISTT.- LAKHISARAI. ------Petitioner-Responent. ----------- 3 16-04-2010 Heard Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, leaned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy, learned counsel for the respondent. Questioning the correctness of the order dated 10.9.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No.11928 of 2009 the present appeal has been preferred. In course of hearing learned counsel appearing for the State submitted that the only grievance the appellant has that the learned Single Judge has directed the disciplinary authority to take a final decision in the light of the enquiry report dated 23.9.2003 contained in 2 Annexure-6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are inclined to clarify the order to the extent that the disciplinary authority is at liberty to differ with the report or to pass any order as is advised in law. With the aforesaid clarification the appeal stands disposed of without any order as to costs. (Dipak Misra, C.J.) Abhay Kumar ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)