1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR LPA No.483/2011 in WP No. 3599/2011 Roshani w/o Dheeraj Chaware Vs. Family Court NO.3, Nagpur and another. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM :B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : 23/11/2011. Application made by present appellant seeking direction to respondent-husband to pay balance amount of gold of Rs. 25,000/- to her without insisting of any compliance as condition precedent has been rejected by Family Court and that has been maintained by learned Single Judge of this Court. We have heard Mr. Raghute, Advocate for the appellant. He contends that the respondent-husband could have been directed to deposit that amount with Family Court as per Clause No. VI of the Compromise Deed. We find that prayer as made by the appellant was considered by the Family Court as well as learned Single Judge of this Court. Hence, we see no jurisdictional error or perversity. LPA is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE Ambulkar.