IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 3237 of 2007 Between: 1 T. Swetha, D/o. T. Ram Murthy, R/o. 6-4-494/2, Krishnanagar Colony, Bolakpoor, Secunderabad (H.T.No. 0571086) 2 S. Mariam Seher, D/o. Dr. Siddiq, R/o. Q.No. 50, Railway Colony, Kurnool (H.T.No. 0571075) 3 M. Uma Rani, D/o. M. Venkata Reddy, R/o. 2-32, Chandanagar (Post) Serilingampally (Mandal), Ranga Reddy District (H.T.No. 0571088) 4 P. Sravana Sandhya, D/o. Muniswamy, R/o. 7/76-B, Upstairs, NGO's Colony, KADAPA (H.T.No. 0571080) 5 B. Sai Padma Prashanthi, D/o. B. Sundar Raj, R/o. Koppuvari Street, GIDDALUR (Post), Prakasam District. Hyderabad (H.T.No. 0571077) 6 L. Praveena, D/o. L. Nagendera Babu, R/o. 12-5-111, FCI Colony, Near LIG Bus Stop, ANANTAPUR (H.T.NO. 0571035) 7 K. Pushpalatha, D/o. Tippi Reddty, R/o. A/172, Sri Sailam Project (Post), Kurnool District. (H.T.No. 0571033) 8 M.J.K. Sowjanya, D/o. M. Narasimha Murthy, R/o. B/C 72B-Camp, KURNOOL (H.T.NO. 0571036) 9 R. Sudheesha, D/o. R. Madhjusudan Rao, R/o. Venkatapuram (Post, Allagadda Taluk, KURNOOL (H.t.no. 0571072) 10 N. Vinay Kumar, S/o. N. Chandraiah, R/o. 154-1097, RF Road, TADIPATRI, Anantapur District (H.T.No. 0571050) 11 N. Prem KUmar, S/o. N. Devadas, R/o. 3-242, 2nd Road, Gangaraju Nagar, Valasapakala, KAKINADA East Godavari District.(H.T.No. 0570091) 12 U. Ratna Sree, D/o. U. Sharma, R/o. 1-4-84, Parupally Street, Near Rama Mandir, Siddipet, Medak District (H.TNo. 0566116) 13 B. Poonam, D/o. B. sudharshan Reddy, R/o. Plot No. 48, Brindavan Enclave, Bolaram (Pot), Secunderabad, (H.T.No. 0566014) 14 R. Pavan Kumar, S/o. R. Sadgunachary, R/o. 11-6-100/2, Pochamma Bagh, Saroorangar,' Hyderabad, (H.T.No. 0566101) 15 T. Amit Kumar, S/o. T. Seshagiri, R/o. 2-1-283, Flat No. 502, Sai Vishnu Apartments, Nallakunta, Hyderabad (H.T.No. 0566007) 16 Bussu Manjira, D/o. B. Sudhakar Reddy, R/o. Flat No. 1, Sairam Nagar, Karmanghat, L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad. (H.T.No. 0566025) 17 Koppolu Ramya, D/o. K. Rajani,. R/o. 3-5-347, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad (H.T.No. 0566076) 18 S. Bala Sarweshkumar, S/o. S. Prabhakara Rao, R/o. H.No. 1-4-379/1, Satyanagar Colony, New Maruthinagar, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad (H.T.No. 0566120) 19 J. Kavya Rao, S/o. J. Satyanarayana Rao, R/o. H.No. 2-8-677, Bhavanignagar, Hanumakonda, Warangal D8istrict (H.T.No. 0566062) ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Dr. N.T.R. University of Health Sciences, Rep. by its Registrar, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2 The Joint Registrar (Examinations) Dr. N.T.R. University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3 Santhiram Medical College, Rep. by its Principal, Nandyal, Kurnool District. 4 Chalamada Ananda Rao Medical College, Rep. by its Principal, Bommakal Village, Karimnagar Mandal & District. 5 Konaseema Institute of Medical Sciences, Chaitanyanagar, Amalapuram, East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ declaring that the action of the respondent University contained in their fax communication, dated 12-2-2007, directing the colleges not to gie effect to the results of the Petitioners, dated 05-2-2007, that the petitioners have passed I year MBBS is arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioners to prosecute their MBBS course, namely, II Year MBBS in the academic year 2006-2007 and onwards by treating that the Petitioner have cleared all the subjects of I Year MBBS in the examinations that were held in September, 2006. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.V.VENKATARAMANA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.D.V.NAGARJUNA BABU The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No.3237 of 2007 ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in view of the subsequent developments, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication on merits. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _______________ 28.04.2009 VGB