y ^' ^SNGLE IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^^(C.G.) WRIT PETITION^CINO. .3n|C) OF 2009 PETITIONER PLAINTIFF .^ ^^l^y^vsy::- ^^.^^t^'1-- ^^'" ,...-••••""" ^•"" RESPONDENTS : DEFENDANTS ^ Bhaiyalal Son of Shobhnath, aged about 45 years, Caste Sahu, Resident of Village Maja (Kharrapara), Police Station ,..,.•", Ramanujnagar, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS 1. Maheshwari D/o Kishun Rajwar, aged about 40 years, Occupation Housewife, Resident of Village Maja, Police Station Ramanujnagar, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). 2. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Collector Surguja, District Surguja (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA —78 <nwiT^»*ii<!b TocT ^it^tid<LI, ^til^^Ko, [®i<ni<riy _J^..K.L>^...'?:!)1C>... ^200^ ^T^T TWF ( ^I^<SI<^I) 3^1'^l'^NT 'cisn 3??^ ^^r^" ^ I^TW^^^¥r S.B^Hon'ble ShriJustice N.K. A^arwal 14.05.2009 Shri Ashok Kumar Shukla, Shri Rahul Mishra, Advocatej for Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel| No.2. With the consent ofthe couil matter is heard finally. The instant petition is dii{e< 03.10.2008 (Annexure P/3), passedjby Civil District Surguja (CG), whereby thej adjoumment under Order 17 Rule 1| Ramlakhan, was rejected on the have been gmnted to the plaintiff, failed to complete his ©vidence. Shri Ashok Kumar Shukla, 1| petitioner submits that a chance examine witness Ramlakhan in the Rahul Mishra, counsel for responde^it No. cost. After hearing both the partis| impugned order, it is directed tha^ ^qf^f^ 'W^ff ^ 'fe^t ll •^ar^a^r 4dvocate for the petitioner. respondent No. 1. |Lawyer for the State/respondent Isel appearing for the parties, the ?cted against the order dated d jby Civil Judge, Class I, Surajpur, application of the petitioner for ofCPC, to examine one vvitaess gjround that several oppoiliinities [nd despite that, the plaintiff has t^iay ^amed counsel appearing for the be given to the plaintiff to Interest ofjustice, for whieh Shri >. 1 has no objection but for ^, having perused the record arid as last oppoitimity, if plaintiff ^^... ^l^T^Tfe^W ^Ta^^^qN- t Sahu Y..- l^N ^fp^n-wsji^ "g^ ^rFTT^r, ^thpTs', ^rii7.C>^... ^200 ^? ^^"^^ (1^t^^) 1^TW°^?^T^T keep present his witness adduce his evidence on the next liate fixed by the trial court, then the | to examine the said witness^ su|bject 500/- as cost to respondent herei4. With the above direction, t| $.amlakhan before the trial court to pate of hearing, as has already been jtrial court shall permit the plaintiff to payment of a sum of Rs. "^Fjt^ft^r 'Rpi'^f "^ fe^ 7f^^ ^^tRFT3H^f tiis petition stands disposed of. Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge ^fi^T^n ^^N H^Fi^^^R[<?T^-—FS/9S—! 1 /2008-1,00-000. K