IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYAN AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A. No. 1886 of 2004(O&M) Date of decision: January 22,2007 Bal Kishan V. Piara Lal and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL Present: Shri Surender Dhall,Advocate, for the appellant. Shri C.B.Kaushik, Advocate,for the respondents. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral) The plaintiff has concurrently lost before the two courts below in his suit for permanent injunction. In the suit, the plaintiff claimed that he was owner in possession of the suit property and the defendants have no right to dispossess him in any manner being totally strangers. Both the courts below have concurrently held that the plaintiff has neither proved to be owner nor in possession of the suit property. Nothing has been shown that the findings recorded by the two Courts below suffer from any infirmity or are contrary to the record. No question of law, much less any substantial question of law, arises in the present appeal. Dismissed. January 22,2007 ( Viney Mittal ) sks Judge