c^-/ IN THE mGH PETITIONER: COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) No. of 2011. Nasir Khan aged about 64 years, son of Late Shri Amir Khan, President: Managing Committee, Chirmiri Colliery Viddyalaya, Chirimiri, District- Korea, (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS y^^ <e&/ ,<>^y ^$&v ^ State of C.G. Through : the Secretay, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.). 2. District Education ofBcer, Bainkunthpur, District, Korea. (C.G.) 3. Director, Public Education, Directorate, Raipur, (C.G.) 4. -Vikash Singh S/o Late Shri Aaand Bahadur, Resident ofKachchi Dafai, Chota Bazar, Chinuiri, District- Korea (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WMTS ORDER OR ORDERS DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. an^r w R-<i* 'HSTT STI^T a>4 <• "4i^i<n'4,'^ftajre, f^diyy ...\^.l^..^lQl!l T<^7 (1i^3^p) TsnwBfeiw^f SB: Hon'ble Shri Manjndra Mohan^hrivastava,j. 27-06-2011 Shri R. K. Jaiswal, counsel for U Shri Vinay Pandey, Panel Lawyi 3 on advance copy. Heard. Grievance raised through this President of Managing Committee, Ch that the respondent No.4 is lodging fal insisting the petitioner to accept appointment dated 27-05-2011. je petitioner. ^rforthe State/respondents No.1 to fjetition by the petitioner, who is the |rmiri Colliery Vidyalaya, Chirmiri, is l^e report before the Policy authority (is joining, pursuant to order of Learned counsel for the petitioi No.4 was appointed vide order dated the relevant documents within time, thi the joining of respondent No.4. Howev not cancelled the order dated 27-05-2( pressurizing the petitioner to accept against the petitioner to exert undue his joining. In the opinion of this Courtj pressurized through the Police No.4, the petitioner's remedy is to seelf alleged to be used against him. As fai| 27-05-2011 is concerned, no such rel| through this petition on the ground tha( <*il<4tilt41-( TV^i <f 1SSS ^S^H ^siRwsn^i ^ersubmits that though respondent 27-05-2011, he has not submitted irefore, the petitioner did not accept ^r, the District Education Officer has 111 and now the respondent No.4 is |his joining by lodging false report iressure on the petitioner to accept in case, the petitioner is being Machi^ery at the instance of respondent direction against any criminal force as prayer for quashing order dated |ef can be claimed by the petitioner the respondent No.4 did not submit f, ff5i=iwira—t's/l40—2 /2.0' 1 ~ 1.50,000. {,!?—...•»•;,> 3 ii- ~h "41-4101 Al, f'TS, z Sfi^'I'tpRt' (' 311^1 ^i( ft-fi* ;d%H ^TI^? ^i'qi^ TCtim ^fCT a.n^i —^ 'i'Jmane his testimonials/certificates within t^ Education Officer may be apprised submission of testimonials/certificates already apprised, who may take approp With the aforesaid observation, tl <*i^iii"t4-t ^wvS tf fstS <!»i^i< ^siRm sii^i |e time stipulated. The District |by the petitioner regarding non by the respondent No.4, if not I'iate decision in that regard. \ie petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge •n'&i 'S'fi wikw, VSI-IWM— FS/140—2/20'!--1.50,000. i