1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 3939 OF 2009 (Subhash Sheshrao Pisal .v. Nagpur Municipal Corporation and another) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri B.G. Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri S.M. Puranik, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 13TH JULY, 2010. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. By this writ petition, the petitioner has made the following prayer :- “(i) by a writ of mandamus or by a suitable writ, order or direction the respondents Nagpur Municipal Corporation and another be directed to immediately initiate and take action in terms of recommendations in paras 18 and 19 of the preliminary enquiry report dated 17.02.2006 (Annexure – A).” We have perused the preliminary enquiry report dated 17.02.2006 and paragraphs 18 and 19 thereof in particular. In paragraph 18, one Sanjay Chamke is held to be prima facie guilty of supporting the petitioner in committing misconduct. Shri Puranik, learned Counsel for the respondents, on instructions, submits that they propose to take action against Sanjay Chamke also. Insofar as the persons mentioned in paragraph 19 are concerned, Shri Puranik submits that they are all badli workers and that they are not permanent employees of the Corporation. He further submits that they were held guilty of only insubordination. He submits that in view of the fact that they are not the permanent employees of Corporation and work as badli workers for hardly few days in a month, there is no question of 2 initiating any action against them as prayed in Writ Petition. In view of the submission of learned Counsel for the respondents, we do not propose to pass any further orders. The writ petition accordingly fails and disposed of as such. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.