IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30854 of 2008 1. RAM SUMIRAN DAS, SON OF LATE DHANIK DAS 2. BABLU KUMAR, SON OF RAM SUMIRAN DAS 3. DHARMBIR DAS, SON OF RAM SUMIRAN DAS ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SAHIN KAMAL, P.S. + P.S. SAHIN KAMAL, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI. ----- PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SITA RAM DAS, SON OF LATE KACHO DAS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SAHEBPUR KAMAL, P.S. SAHEBPUR KAMAL, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI ---- OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 2 24.6.2011 The petitioners are aggrieved by the order refusing to discharge them dated 31.5.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge - I, Begusarai in Sessions Trial No. 134 of 2008 for the offences under Sections 341, 323 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been argued that the injury is of such a nature that they would not amount to an offence committed under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. The nature of the injury, manner of occurrence and the evidence that comes on record will need to be considered by the Court below, before the Court can conclude that an offence is made out under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. These aspects of the matter cannot be considered in details at the stage of framing of charges. In the result, I find no merit in this case. This application is dismissed. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)