IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26196 of 2011 Ali Imam @ Jhagaru, son of late Ali Akhtar Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 09.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner has absconded for a number of years, I am not inclined to grant him bail at this stage. However, the Trial Court shall release the petitioner on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in connection with Siwan Town P.S. Case No. 151 of 1994, Trial No. 77 of 2011 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the wife of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail. 2 (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The Trial Court shall also make an effort to complete the trial within a period of six months next so that there is no further unnecessary complication of this type in the case. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)