1 W.P.No.6535.99 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6535 OF 1999 1. The President, Deola Education Society, Deola, & 2 others. ... Petitioners v/s 1. Smt.Shaila Prakash Bhaviskar & anr. ... Respondents Mr.Rajdeep Khadapkar for petitioner No.3. Mr.S.D.Rayrikar, A.G.P. for respondent No.2. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 4TH MARCH, 2011 ORAL JUDGMENT: 1. The only issue involved in the present petition is whether the petitioners could have terminated the services of respondent No.1 because respondent No.2 had not granted approval for her appointment. Admittedly, the services of respondent No.1 were terminated because no approval was granted. There was no other reason for termination of her services. 2 W.P.No.6535.99 2. The issue is now well settled by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of St.Ulai High School & Anr. vs. Devendraprasad Jagannath Singh & Anr., reported in 2007 (1) Mh.L.J., that the services of an employee cannot be terminated by the school merely because the management of the school has not received approval for the appointment of that employee. 3. The order of the School Tribunal is upheld. However, the petitioners are at liberty to apply to respondent No.2 for approval of the appointment of respondent No.1 which may be considered by respondent No.2 in accordance with law. 4. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. 5. Rule discharged. No costs. ..... ..... 3 W.P.No.6535.99