THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.18449 of 2010 ORDER: In this writ petition, petitioner, who claims ownership and title to a house site admeasuring 108.33 sq.yards out of Ac.1.72 cents covered by Survey No.843/2 of Madkalavaripalli Village fields, Gopavaram Mandal, Kadapa District, has questioned the notice, dated 28.06.2010 issued by the third respondent – Mandal Surveyor, Bramhamgari Matham Mandal, Kadapa District. It is the case of the petitioner that when respondents 4 and 5 were trying to interfere with the said house site, he filed O.S.No.68 of 2010 for grant of permanent injunction restraining them from interfering with the above said property. It is stated that there is also a temporary injunction in his favour, restraining respondents 4 and 5, and not to interfere with the possession of the suit schedule property. It is his grievance that respondents 4 and 5 have filed an application before the second respondent requesting to fix the boundaries of their land as they also own an extent of Ac.0.08 cents of land covered by Survey No.843/2 of same village. Basing on such application, the impugned notice was issued to fix the boundaries of the land belongs to respondents 4 and 5. Merely because the suit was filed by the petitioner for injunction that does not preclude the third respondent to fix the boundaries to the land of respondents 4 and 5 basing on the application submitted by them. When the application was moved before the competent authority under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 by paying necessary fee through a challan, it is the duty of the authorities concerned to survey and fix the boundaries to the land concerned. In that view of the matter, I do not find any illegality in issuing the impugned notice, which warrants interference by this Court at this stage. The writ petition is devoid of merit and is accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 30th JULY, 2010. kvni