IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC (T) No.: 241 of 2008. Decided on: 04.10.2010. __________________________________________________________ Bhawani Dutt. … Petitioner. Versus B.M. Nanta and others. … Respondents/Contemnors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. M.C. Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents/ Contemnors : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondent No.1. Mr. L.N. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. None for respondent No.3. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Since the petitioner has already been paid the retiral benefits as per contents of para 4 of the reply, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the same is dismissed as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 04, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?