Petitioner ^-^. ^c M/s. Agrawai Oit Ertraction Ltd., through te Director O.P. Agrawai, aged about 49 years, Viiiage Tuisi, Post Tiida, District 1) Union of India, through Ministry of Coal, NewDelhi. 2) Coal 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Colkata. Coai Fields Limited., through Chief Managing Director, SECL, 4) Director Technical, SECL, Bilaspur (CG). 5) General Manager Saies, SECL, Biiaspur 8) Chief Sales Manager, SECL, Biiaspur SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Y.C. Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri B.R. Mair;/, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Standing Counse! for Union of india/respondent No.' Shri P.S. Koshy, counSei for respondents No. 2 to 6. (Passedon 29'" November, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the p&Woner submits that the issue involved in this petition was under consideration before the No. 5302 of 2006 (M/s. Ashoka & others Vs. Unlon of india and others). that the respondents-authorities may b® representation of the petitioner, in accordance Supreme Court in Civi! Smokeiess Coai India Pvt. Ltd Learned counsel further prays directed to consider the .-7.- with iaw and in ths light of judgment and by the Supreme Court in M/s. case (supra). Learned counsel last petitsoner is squarely covered by the jui 2006 passed by the Supreme Court in india Pvfs case (supra). ^•-z^ order dated 1-12-2006 passsd SmokeSess Coal India Pvt's that the case of the and order datsd 1-12- SVI/s. Ashoka Smokeiess Coal 2) In view of the above submission made by the petitioner, Shri P.S. Koshy, leamed counsel appearing for the respondents No. 2 to S submits that if an appiication is fiied by the petitioner before the respondents No. 3 to 6/authorities , the same wouid be considered in accordance vflth law and in the iight of the judgment and order dated 1-12-2006 passed by the Supreme Court in M/s. Ashoka Smokeless Coal India Pvt's case (supra). 3) Without making any observation on merit, the petitioner is at tiberty to make appropriate representation beforethe respondents No. 3 to Ql authorities. The respondents No. 3 to 5/authorities, in turn, shail consider and decide the same, in accordance with law and In the light of the judgment and order passed by the Supreme Court in M/s. Ashoka Smokeless Coa! india Pvt's case (supra), within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation. 4) Accordingly, the petition stands dispossd of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge