Crl. Misc. No. M-21438 of 2010 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-21438 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: 26.10.2010 Anita & Ors. ..........Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ..........Respondent BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. K.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. R.S. Rawat, AAG, Punjab. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. The present petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail has been filed on behalf of Anita, Lajo Devi and Ram Dev in case FIR No. 6 dated 31.5.2010 registered under Sections 363/366- A/376/120-B IPC at Police Station Canal Colony, Bathinda, District Bathinda. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that petitioner No.1 is young unmarried sister, petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are parents of main accused-Rinku, respectively and have been falsely implicated in this case. They had no role to play in enticing Babli and no specific allegation has been made against them and they have been involved later on with the aid of Section 120-B IPC. Learned counsel further submits that in compliance of directions issued by this Court on 4.8.2010, the petitioners have joined the investigation and are no more required for further investigation and Crl. Misc. No. M-21438 of 2010 (2) challan has also been presented. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has also affirmed the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioners and also states that they are no more required. Since the petitioners have joined the investigation, interim order dated 4.8.2010 passed by this Court is hereby made absolute. However, the petitioners shall abide by the conditions envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. October 26, 2010 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE Note:-Whether this case is to be referred to the Reporter .......Yes/No