IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 942 OF 1997 Central Warehousing Corporation. ... Petitioner. V/s. Assistant Commissioner of Customs and others. ... Respondents. S.I.Shah i/b. S.I.Shah & Co. for the petitioner. Rui A. Rodrigues for respondent No.2. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED : 4th January 2010. P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for respondent No.2. None appears for the other respondents. Perused petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner took us through the petition and tried to contend that the petitioners have to recover the amount from respondent No.2. The learned Division Bench presided over by Hon ble Chief Justice Shri M.B.Shah (as he then was), while admitting this petition vide its order dated 14th October, 1997, was pleased to observe that the dispute involved being interdepartmental, the Central Government has already formed a Committee for resolving such dispute between the Government bodies; as such, petitioner was directed to prefer proper application before the said committee for redressal of the dispute. Accordingly, the Committee was directed to decide the representation, which was to be made by the petitioner before the said Committee. By this time representation must have been made and decided. However, learned counsel appearing for the parties are not aware of the factual matrix prevailing as on date. In this view of the matter, remedy provided being an alternate remedy, we do not propose to go into the merits of the matter and leave the petitioner to prosecute the remedy suggested in the order dated 14th October, 1997. All contentions are kept open. In the circumstances, petition stands disposed of in terms of this order with no order as to costs. (K.K.TATED, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)