man coum or magma, muspun, _ mus) No. ssoa at 2007; Baboo Lal Bamth, s/o Shri Kartik. Ram Bamth, aged about 44 years, Asst. Teacher, Govt. Primaxy School, Puchheli, Block Bamhnidih; Distt. Janjgir Champa (0G), Versus RESPONDENTS 1 State of Chhatu'sgarh, Though: Secmtaxy, Department of Education » D.K.S. Bh‘awan, Raipur (C.G‘.). District Education. ' ' 0mm, 2 Disttdanjgir Champa (C.G.‘).' Block Education. 0%,“, Block. v- 3 Bamhnidih, Distt. Janjg'r Champa (QG); (Writ PEtition awe: Ankh 226 o! the Wmmtmon 9f IndiaL “- ' x”:) Shri Anil Singh Rajput, counsel for the pctiu‘oner. Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Govt. Advocate, for the State on advance copy. ORM: OMR' (20.09.2007) BUMLKUMARSINHA, J. Heald on admission. Learned counsel for the petitioner oubmitsr that the peu'tioner haspwsed D.Ed. examinau'on on his own expenses, therefore, he is entitled to receive two advance increments acooniing to circulam dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also submits that in many identical matters, the petitions have been allowed in terms of the oxder passed‘in the case 0f Yashwant Kumar Bhamdwql Vs. W Carpal-dour, Duty and another {2006 (m mJR-CG 96}. He submits that , the case of the petitioner is squarely coveted by the. said». . Judgment. This legal position isnot disputed by the learned counsel for the State. However, he submits that the order may be passed in terms ofthe said judgment, but it shall be subjected. to verihcah'on regarding petitioner’s such qualihcation. W.P.(S) No. 5803/2007 Accoxdingly, this writ petition. is albwed in tenns of the order passed in case of Yashwant, Kumar BMWaj Vs. Mum'a'pal Corporation, Durg and mthst..(&1pm) subjact to vermcation of the facts as to whethcr the petitionan had." acquired D.Ed.,. Examination Certificate on hisown. axpenaes as V per cimculars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 andiilrthan Whether he has been paid two advance increments or. not. costs. The petitionstands. many disposed of. No otden as to. N e <‘3 H 0 J } Sun“ Kumal‘ Sd" Slnha . ‘ ‘ ‘ ) I Judge f