1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4682 OF 2008 Smt.Vinita Shantibhushan Naik .. Petitioner versus N.K.U.Agro & Ors. .. Respondents Ms.Suhasini Mutalik for the petitioner. Mr.P.B.Shah for the respondents. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 24th September 2009. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. The learned counsel appearing for the parties agree that without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, the application at Exhibit 42 be allowed. The learned counsel request that considering the nature of the dispute, a time bound schedule be fixed for hearing of the suit. 2. Hence, I pass the following order: : O R D E R : (a) The impugned judgment and order dated 7th April 2008 is quashed and set aside and application at Exhibit 42 is allowed. It is made clear that the petitioner will be added as a defendant. 2 (b) The trial Court will endeavour to conclude the trial expeditiously and in any event on or before 31st August 2010. (A.S.OKA,J)