WWW—arm \Al P w 9&m1‘a200 WW 31mm (Wu) ammm mmm ER 4 y‘mm a;q(7Q'q%WT;m@'é§iEgz . . SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRIT ER. DIWAKER 3.8. 10a20 10 Shri F‘.S.Khare§ counsel for t petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, PL. for the tate. Counsei for the petitioner su mits that earlier the petitioner had filed W.P.(S} No. 7541 [2007 Whi h was allowed by this Court vide order dated 20. 12.2007 (Annexure P 5). This Court observed that the order of his Court would be subjec to all verifications made by the State regarding facts pleaded in the petition. Counsel for the petitioner submits that though pet tion of the; petitioner has been allowed and respondents were unde obligation to extend benetit after necessary verification, till date exer ise of verification has not been completed. He submits that a time ound direction may be issued to complete the verification Within a sti ulated time. State counsel submits that as the order of the Court was subject to necessary verifications, e petitioner can claim benefit only after due and proper verificatio by the competent authority. Taking into consideration the submissions made as above and also that the order was passed o 20.12.2007 in the case of the petitioner, respondents are directed o carry out necessary verification its order dated 20. 12.2007 in er limit of four months from the as ordered by this Court earlier W.P.(S) Nos. 7541/2007 with an date of receipt of copy of this order. It would be the duty of the petitioner to apprise the respondents about the passing of th s order. the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge With the aforesaid. observatio I K h h L i o i ,