IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44122 of 2009 MOHAMMAD RAJU ANSARI @ RAJU ANSARI, Son of Sagir Ansari, Resident Kopa Dakhinwari Tola, P.S. Kopa, District Saran Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ….. Opposite Party ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr. Uma Shankar Pd. Singh, A.P.P. 3 09.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 411, 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that petitioner was chased and apprehended by local persons as he was trying to escape after committing theft. He was produced before the Mukhiya of the village and on search one ring, knife as well as two empty case made for keeping jewellary were found from him. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the alleged seizure list has not been prepared in accordance with law and the production - cum – seizure list has wrongly been created for the purpose of falsely implicating the petitioner. It is submitted that the stolen - 2 - jewellary etc. had not been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that the antecedent of the petitioner is clean and he is in custody since 3.10.2009. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, MOHAMMAD RAJU ANSARI @ RAJU ANSARI, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chapra, in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No. 131 of 2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be his father. If, after his release in this case, the petitioner is again found implicated in similar nature of cases, then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Spd/ (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)