IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32579 of 2010 1. ARVIND PANDEY 2. Ramashish Yadav @ Sipahi Yadav Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 4/ 07.02.2011 In view of the order dated 15.11.2010, petitioner no.1 has already been granted anticipatory bail. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner no.2 and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is alleged for demanding ransom from the informant. Informant is partner of co-accused, Arvind Pandey business of crusher machine in name of Arvind Pandey. Money is said to be paid by this informant in capacity of partner agreed after license to co-accused, Arvind Pandey. Crusher machine if is in possession of this petitioner that is jointly with co-accused, Arvind Pandey in whose name business is running and cash credit loan is deposited by Arvind Pandey himself in presence of this petitioner and one, Parsuram Singh. Petitioner is now claiming partner of the business of Arvind Pandey. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner no.2 is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Dehri Town P.S. Case No. 523 of 2009 above named petitioner no.2 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram 2 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)