IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.11958 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 21.3.2011 Om Pati ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.S.R.Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr.R.K.Malik, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Vishal Malik, Advocate for respondent No5. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. C.M.No.2675 of 2011 Allowed as prayed for. C.W.P.No.11958 of 2009 The petitioner disputes the factum of holding of an enquiry before her services were dispensed with. The Enquiry Officer, Shri Ram Singh, on the other hand, put in appearance before this Court to state that the enquiry was duly conducted. The petitioner again C.W.P.No.11958 of 2009 (O&M) -2- controverts the holding of such enquiry and veracity thereof. On due consideration of the matter, I am of the opinion that the controversy raised before this Court involves disputed questions of fact which cannot be answered in exercise of jurisdiction under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to pursue alternate remedy which may be available to him under the law. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid granted. 21.3.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss