IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.79 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2590 OF 2008 Shri P.Nandarajan (deceased) ..... Applicants (through his Lrs.) vs. Vimal Builders ..... Respondents Mr.Niranjan Mundargi, Advocate for Applicants. Mr.Manoj Mohite a/w Sandip Bhimekar i/by Wadia Ghandy & Co. for respondent no.1. Coram : Smt. R.P.SondurBaldota, J. Dated : 25th June 2009. PC :- 1. This Criminal Application has been placed before me in view of the order dated 17th April 2009. The application was required to be placed before this Court considering the nature of prayer clause (b) in the Criminal Application and the averments made therein. The other relief sought in the application at prayer clause (a) is for expeditious hearing of Criminal Writ Petition No.2590 of 2008. Mr.Mundargi, the learned counsel for the applicants states that he will not press for the relief at prayer clause (b), if the hearing of the main Writ Petition itself is expedited. Mr.Mohite,learned Adv. for respondent no.1 states that he has no objection for early hearing of the matter. In that circumstance, the Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The parties are however, directed to mention the matter before the regular court for fixing up date of final hearing of the petition. (Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota,J.)