IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.1000 of 2008 Date of Decision:- 05.05.2008 Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee, Amritsar ....Petitioner(s) through Mr.P.S.Thiara, Advocate vs. Ram Singh ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) This revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 23.3.2006 passed by the Rent Controller, Amritsar whereby an ejectment application under Section 13 of the East Punjab Rent Restriction Act, 1949 was dismissed, as well as against the order dated 25.9.2007 passed by the appellate Authority under the Act upholding the above- mentioned order of the Rent Controller. The petitioner-SGPC sought eviction of the respondent-tenant on two grounds, namely, non-payment of rent and material alteration in the premises which have allegedly impaired its value and utility. So far as the non-payment of rent is concerned, both the Courts have concurrently held that the respondent-tenant has paid the entire rent and nothing has been found due. As regard to the second plea, namely, impairing the value and C.R.No.1000 of 2008 -2- utility of the demised premises, the Manager of the petitioner-landlord appeared as a witness and candidly admitted that by raising the projection the value and utility of the premises has been increased. In view of the above-noticed admitted case, the second ground for ejectment has also become redundant. No interference by this Court in the impugned order, therefore, is called for. Dismissed. May 05, 2008 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE