IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5584 of 2010 INDAR MUSHHAR SON OF NAGESHWAR MANJHI, R/O MOHALLA- BAHADURPUR HOUSING COLONY, P.S.- AGAMKUAN, DISTRICT- PATNA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5 21/07/2010 Heard Mr. Harendra Kumar learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the petition. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 30.4.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 6520 of 2009. Submission is that the petitioner is in custody since 10.9.2008 and the process server of Nazarat has reported that the witnesses named in the chargesheet are non-existent. To ascertain this fact a report was called for which has been received. It is further submitted that supplementary affidavit has already been filed. Report dated 30th April, 2010 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patna City shows that the process server enquired about the witnesses Om Prakash, Rajhu Manjhi, Malti Devi and Ganesh Thakur but no trace was made out. 2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge/concerned Court, Patna City in Sessions Trial No. 670 of 2009 arising out of Sultanganj (Agamkuan) P.S. Case No. 476 of 2006. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)