IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10612 of 2009 1. Rama Kant Mishra, son of Late Baratdeo Mishra 2. Neelam Devi @ Kumari Neelam Mishra, wife of Rama Kant Mishra 3. Rajneesh Mishra @ Rajneesh @ Rajni Kant Mishra 4. Manish Mishra, son of Rama Kant Mishra 5. Anpurna Mishra @ Mini @ Minni Devi, wife of Rajnesh Mishra, All resident of village Bahadurpur, P.S. Patori, district Samastipur Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05/ 24.08.2009 As requested, the husband of the complainant, Rimmi Devi as also her sister-in-law, namely, Minni Devi, wife of petitioner no.3 are directed to be impleaded in this case as petitioner nos. 4 and 5 and vakalatnama filed on their behalf is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Section 498A and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code. They are named in the complaint and it is submitted on their behalf that notwithstanding the allegations set out in the complaint they are agreeable to resume the matrimonial ties with the Rimmi Devi, the complainant and for that purpose they shall file written undertaking on affidavit within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order in the court below. No sooner the aforesaid affidavit is filed in the court below, petitioners above named be admitted to the privilege of 2 provisional bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rs. Five thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, Samastipur in connection with C.R. Case No. 102 of 2009, subject to the conditions, as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and thereafter notice be issued to the complainant and once she appears, petitioners in general and Manish Mishra in particular should persuade her to come back to the matrimonial home and resume the matrimonial ties. In the event complainant comes back to the matrimonial home or the matrimonial dispute is resolved or she is found to be unreasonable, provisional bail allowed to the petitioner be confirmed, otherwise the court below shall be at liberty to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law considering the reasonableness of the stand of the parties. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioners. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)