IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15371 of 2006 SHASHI PRASAD SINGH, Son of Late Darshan Prasad Singh, Resident of Village – Bihma, P.O. and P.S. - Tarapur, District – Munger. ------------- Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through its Secretary, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Banka. 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Banka. 5. The Treasury Officer, Banka. 6. The Head Master, Middle School, Garibpur, Amarpur, Banka. -------------- Respondents ----------- 2 5/5/2011 Heard Sri Jyoti Ranjan Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Madhukar Mishra, learned A.C. to Govt. Advocate No. 9, who appears on behalf of all the respondents. The present writ petition was filed with a prayer to direct the respondents to make payment of accumulated amount of suspense account since 01.04.1976 alongwith statutory interest till the date of payment. The writ petition was filed in the year 2006. However, till date, no counter affidavit has been filed. It has jointly been prayed that the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no. 4/District Superintendent of Education, Banka. In view of stand taken by the parties there is no need to further keep the matter pending. Accordingly, the writ petition is being disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no. 4, within a period of six weeks from today. 2 If such representation is filed, respondent no. 4, is directed to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If the respondent no. 4 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. It goes without saying that petitioner shall be entitled to get admissible statutory interest on delayed payment. Even in case of refusal, respondent no. 4, is directed to pass a speaking order within aforesaid time. With above observation and direction the writ petition stands disposed of. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)