IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1677 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: October 20, 2009. Shil Kumar Mariya ...Petitioner(s) v. Satish Chandra & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate, for the petitioner. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): As per the averments made in this petition, the respondents have failed to comply with the judgment dated 6.3.2009 passed by this Court despite the fact that the aforesaid judgment is in the knowledge of the respondents as the respondents were duly represented at the time of passing of the judgment. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Without going into merits of the contention as raised by learned counsel for the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to direct the respondents to comply with the judgment dated 6.3.2009 passed in CWP No.625 of 1997 within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Disposed of. October 20, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge