^' c^ G !iisiii" a;tS're UwiiUn W THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONTEMPTPETITIONNO. j.-l^ /2004 PETITIONER RESPONDENT 9.^^ A<fl^<^ ^sss^ ^^^ ^y (€.°•' ^ ': sfaw Mohd Masud S/o Sheikh Farid ,aged Aged 65 years, r/o villlage Ghutkel at present r/o Rawabhata,District Raipur VERSUS 1. Mohd. Hanif S/o Sheikh Farid aged about 82 years, r/o Koshtapara Dhamtari ,Tah. & Distt Dhamtari. 2. Smt. Mangala Tai aged about 36 years W/o Shri Dada Saheb Pawar 3. Smt. Saageeta aged about 30 years W/o Ravindra Kumar Pawar respondent no. 2 and 3 both are R7o Sadar Bazar Dhamtari Dist. Dhamtari (C.G.) 4. Sub-registrar Dhamtari Dist. Dhamtari (C.G.) 5. Patwari Hatka No. 16 Rajashw Maadal Dhamtari Tah- Dhamtari Dist. Dhamtari (C,G.) APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 39 RULEJACPC FQR INITIATING CONTEMPT PROCEEDING AGAINST THE CONTEMNER IN NOT HONOURING THE ORBE R OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 2tll.3 IN CIVIL REVISION N0.27^<jF 2001 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR: CHHATTISGARH Sinflie Bench Hon'ble Shri H.L. Dattu, CJ. Contempt Petition No.127 OF 2004 Petitioner Mohci Masud Vs. Respondent Mohd. Hanif and Others. Present: Smt. Renu Kochar, counsei for the petitioner. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 28 February, 2007) This Court by its Order dated 24.11.2001 in Civil Revtsion No.278 of 2001 had passed the following order. "In the meanwhile. aiisnation of the property in dispute shall not be made without permission of the Court." (2) it is the case of the petitioner in this contempt petition 1 that the respondents have disobeyed the interim order passed by this Court on 24.11.2001. (3) In the petition it is not stated when the respondents were made known about the order passed by thls Court on 24.11.2001. !fthe respondents were aware of the order passed by this Court on 24.11.2001, they would not have sold or in any way atienate the propsrty. In that view of the matter, it cannot be said that the respondents have committed any contempt. Therefore cognizance of this contempt petition need not be taken by me. The Contempt petition is accordingly rejected. Ordered accordingly. (4) Consequently, I.A.No.3141/2004 and 3142^2004, stand disposed of. sd/- Chief Justice