IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. No.6/^ /2010 ,_-- ( Arising out ofW. P. (PIL) No.4244/2010 ) APPLICANTS: ^::^ *' •^ " f^ 1. Bajrang Lal Soni S/o Late Shri Bharat Lal Soni, aged about 43 years, President Itwari Bazar Bachao Samiti, Ward No. 4, Korba, R/o Rani Mahal Road, Purani Basti, Korba (CG). 2. Chhedi Lal Sahu S/o Shri B.R. Sahu, aged about 57 years, R/o Purani Basti, Korba, Tahsil and District Korba (CG). RESPONDENTS: Versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Urban Adm.inistration and Development Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The Commissioner, Urban Administration and Development Department, Raipur (CG). 3. The CoUector, Korba , District Korba (CG). 4. The Commissioner, Nagar Palik Nigam, Korba (CG). 5. Mayor, Nagar Palik NIgam, Korba (CG). 6. The Secretary, Nagar Palik Nigam, Korba (CG). 7. Tahsildar, Korba , Tahsil and District Korba (CG). APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF WRIT PETITION (PIL) DIS8MISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Applicants Respondents M.C.C.NO. 618 of 2010 1. Bajrang Lal Soni, S/o Late Shri Bharat Lal Soni, aged about 43 years, President Itwari Bazar Bachao Samiti, Ward No.4, Korba, R/o Rani Mahal Road, Purani basti, Korba (CG) 2. Chhedi Lal Sahu, S/o BR Sahu, aged about 57 years, R/o Purani Basti, Korba, Tahsil and District Korba (CG) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattlsaarh, through the Secretary, Urban Admlnistration and Development Department, Mantralay at DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. The Commissloner, Urban Administration and Development Department, Raipur (CG) The Collector, Korba, Di^rict Korta (CG) 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. The Commissioner, Nagar Palik Nigam, Korba (CG) Mayor, Nagar Palik Nigam, Korba (CG) The Secretary, Nagar Palik Nigam, Korba (CG) Tahsitdar, Korba, Tahsil and District Korba (CG) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF WRFT PETnriON(PIU. Present: Shri Rajnish Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioners } Shri Kishire Bhaduri, Addl. Advocate Generat, for the State/ respondents No.1,2,3 and 7. ORDER >th (10mDecember,2010) The foltowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. As the petitioners have filed certified copy of the order whereby the petitioners' writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution, IA.No.01/2010 seekingexemption from filing the said order has now become infructuous and is hereby dismissed accordinglv. 2) Learned counsel for the parties are heard on the restoration petition. 3) The petitioners are seeking restoration of W.P.(PIL). No.4244/2010, which was dismissed for want of prosecutton vide order dated 07.10.2010. 4) On due consideration of the submissions of teamed counsel for the parties and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, we are satisfied that the absence of the petitionere' counsel on 07.10.2010, when W.P.(PIL). No.4244/2010 was taken-up for hearing, was based on ibona ffcfe grounds. 5). M.C.C.No.618/2010, therefore, is allowed and W.P.(PIL).No.4244/2010 is restored to Bs original number. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge subbu