IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 204 OF 2008 PREMANAND G. PAGUI ... Petitioner Versus THE CANACONA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH CHIEF OFFICER AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. A. D. Bhobe, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sudesh Usgaonkar, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. Rakhi Chodankar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. Coram:- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & R. C. CHAVAN, JJ. Date:- 15th September, 2008 P.C. 1. This writ petition is directed against the Authorities which are incharge of taking actions against illegal constructions. 2. The petition seeks a writ of mandamus directing respondents No.1, 3 and 4 to initiate action against illegal constructions carried out in the property bearing survey No.118/1 and 118/1-B, more particularly described in prayer clause (a) of the petition. 3. The learned Counsel appearing for respondent No.1 states that action, in accordance with law, has been initiated against these constructions and the decision/order in that behalf would be duly communicated to the petitioner. 4. In these circumstances, the petitioner does not press this petition any further and we are satisfied that since the action has been initiated by respondent No.1, nothing more needs to be done. The petition is, therefore, disposed off in the light of the statement of respondent No.1's Advocate. No order as to costs. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. R. C. CHAVAN, J. ssm.