HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.13548 of 2011 Date: 30-12-2011 Between Manne Satyanarayana … Petitioner and The Bantumilli P.A.C.S. Ltd., Bantumilli, Rep. by its Secretary, Bantumilli (V) & (M), Krishna district and another … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.13548 of 2011 Order: The petitioner borrowed agricultural loan from the 1st respondent-Society on 28-12-2011. He has impugned the Demand Notice dated 01-3-2010 calling upon him to remit the due amount on or before 31-3-2010. 2. The petitioner, while admitting that he borrowed the amount, states that the impugned Demand Notice is not legal and valid by contending that the same is barred by limitation. According to him, the loan was granted in the year 2001 and the same is sought to be recovered in the year 2012. 3. It may be noticed that in order to establish that a debt is time- barred, petitioner is expected to plead all the relevant facts and demonstrably establish that the debt is time-barred. In the instant case, the petitioner admits that after borrowing the loan he paid some instalments. He has not pleaded when the last instalment was paid and whether he had acknowledged the debt thereafter. In the absence of the said pleadings, which are material, it is not possible to adjudicate whether the loan of the petitioner is time-barred in this writ petition. 4. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed, at the stage of admission. 5. In view of disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.16422 of 2011 is dismissed as unnecessary. No costs. ___________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J. 30th December, 2011. Ak HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.13548 of 2011 30th December, 2011. (Ak)