IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 36933 of 2010 Date of decision:16.12.2010 Kiran @ Pammi & anr Petitioner vs. State of Punjab and anr Respondent Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR inter alia on the ground that there are vague and uncertain allegations levelled against the petitioners. The entire family members were roped in. Petitioner No.1 is stated to be married sister-in-law of complainant. As per FIR, no specific allegation has been levelled against the petitioners. There is no allegation of dowry articles having been entrusted to the petitioners. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Prima facie the petitioners appear to have an arguable point at the time of consideration of charges. This court has avoided to consider the entire material of report u/s 173(2) Cr.P.C. as the same is not part of file. The petition is disposed of as pre-mature with liberty to the petitioners to take all the pleas before the trial court at the time of consideration of charge. In case the trial court, on the basis of the allegations in the FIR and the material available on the record, is satisfied that the allegations are vague and improbable and that no offence is made out against the petitioners, it will be open to the trial court to drop proceedings against the petitioners by discharging them. December 16 ,2010 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE