Crl. Misc. No. M-6753 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-6753 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 4.3.2011 Surinder Kumar alias Rinku ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Surinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Rajan Gupta, J. (oral) This is a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre- arrest bail in a case registered against the petitioner under Section 304 IPC at Police Station Ahmedgarh, District Sangrur, vide FIR No.12 dated 4th February, 2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a perusal of the FIR shows that no offence is made out against the petitioner. He has referred to statement, Annexure P-2 to contend that deceased died a natural death as she fell down and suffered a heart attack. Thus, she is entitled to pre-arrest bail. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and given careful thought to the facts of the case. The FIR was lodged by Baldev Krishan. In his initial version he alleged that on 26th January, 2011, his son Surinder Kumar alias Rinku entered in his room and started quarreling with him. He told Crl. Misc. No. M-6753 of 2011 that he was in need of money and thus four Bighas of land be sold. He pressurised him to put his thumb impression on the sale-deed. When his wife, namely Pushpa Rani tried to intervene, he pulled her hair and pushed her banging her head in the wall. Pushpa Rani became unconscious and fell down on the ground. However, petitioner kept on inflicting injuries on her. She died on the spot. Keeping in view nature of allegations levelled in the FIR and the gravity of the offence committed, I am of the considered view that petitioner is not entitled to concession of pre-arrest bail. The petition is devoid of merit and is hereby dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 4.3.2011 'rajpal'