HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Writ Appeal No. 557 of 2011 HON'BLE SHRi SUNIL KUMAR SINHA & HON'BLE SHRI RADHE SHYAM SHARMA. JJ. Petitioner RESPONDENTS Shanti Bai Wd/o Late Shri Sampat Singh, aged about 55 years, R/o vlllage- Chirmi, Janpad Panchayat Khadgawan, District Korea (CG) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh : Through Secretary, Panchayat Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2 The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Khadgawan, Distrtet Korea (CG) 3 Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Khadgawan, District Jashpur (CG) 4 Tirath Pal s/o Hiradhan, aged about 40 years, Gram Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Chirmi, R/o Chhotesalhi, P.S. Khadgawan, District Jashpur (CG) 5 Krishna Kurre s/o Panna Lat Kurre, aged about 30 years, Rojgar Sahayat, Gram Panchayat Chirmi, R/o village Chirmi, Janpad Panchayat Khadgawan, District Jashpur (CG) 6 Gram Panchayat Chirmi, through the Secretary, Janpad Panchayat Khadgawan, District Jashpur (CG) 7 Shivkunwar w/o Shri Khunnu Singh, aged about 25 years, R/o village Chirmi, Janpad Panchyat Khadgawan, District Korea (CG) 'l<i>». ^l '''fiVVir WA 557/2011 WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2 SUB SECTION (11 OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH) ACT. 2006 Appearance: Shri Bharat Rajput, Advocate for the appetlant. Shri U.N.S. Deo, Government Advocate for the State/respondents 1 and 2. ORALORDER (15.12.2011) Sunil Kumar Slnha, J. Heard on admission. The appellant has challenged the validity of order dated 23 of November,2011 passed in W.P.(C) No.6895/2011 .The appellant was Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Chirmi. A notice of 'No Confidence Motion' was fited against the appe!lant before the concerned authority on 30.5.2011, who directed for holding the proceedings on No Confidence Motion on 8.6.2011. It was also directed on the same day that notices be issued for Meeting of the said motion. Ultimately, on 8.6.201 1, the motion was carried out against the appel!ant and a formai order to this effect was issued by the concerned authority on 30.6.201 1. The appellant contended before the writ Court that the notice for Meeting of No Confidence Motion was not dispatehed 7 days prior to the date of Meeting; therefore, it vitiates the proceedings. The copy ofthe notice (Annexure P/10) and the order sheets ofthe concerned authority would show that the notices were dlrected to be issued on 30.5.2011 and they were issued on the same day. The writ Court found that the appellant could not establish that the notice (Annexure P/10) in the writ petition though containing the date of issuance as 30.5.201 1, was not dispatehed on the same day. Therefore, finding no illegality in the Meeting of No Confidence Motion, the writ Court dismissed the writ petition. -?'-:-^ WA 557/2011 © Shri Bharat Rajput, learned counsel appearing for the appellant raised almost slmilar points. He tried to demonstrate that the notice dated 30.5.2011 was not issued on the same day. The record of the concernedauthority has been filecl. , Learned counsel for the appellant could not demonstrate before this Court that the notice was not dispatehed in time. In view of the above, we do not find any illegality or irregularity in the impugned order passed by the writ Court, by which, the writ petition filed by the appellanVpetitioner was dismissed. The appeal, therefore, is liable to be dismi'ssed and is hereby dismissed summarily. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge K §dA r Radhe Shyam Sharma ;Judge i\!