^ss^ ..h V--A--v HIQH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 524 of 2004 Petitioner A.S. Roy, aged 37 years, son of Shri D.C. Roy,pQsted as UpperDivjsion Teacher at Go^. Hi'gher Secondary Schooi, Kharsia, District Raigarh, r./o, Gaushaia Marg ~ Kharssa, Dlstrict Raigarh (CG). s^ Respondents W Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Tribnai Welfare Department, Mantrataya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. 2) The Director, Trsbai Welfare Department, R. R.S.LL Campus, Chhattisgarh, Raipur 3) Divisional Deputy Commissioner, Tribat Welfare Department; Biiaspur (CG). 4) Chief Executive Officer-cum-Offlciating Additionai Commisssoner, Tribai Deve!opment, Raigarh (CG). 5) Asssstant Commissioner, Tribai Development; Raigarh (CG). (Writ Petition under Articie 226/227 ofthe Constitution of india) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri R.K. Keshawanj, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passedon 24th January,2^) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Appeilate Authority, wherein the impugned order was under chaiienge, has already decided the appeai and the order has been passed against the petitioner, The petitioner intends to chaiienge the said order passed in appeai. Thus, this petition has become infructuous, to which learned counset appearsng for the State has no objection. 2) Accordingiy, the petitlon is dssmissed as having become infructuous.. raju Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge