1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 101 OF 1990 Executor of the Estate of .... Applicant Nozer E.D. Pandole Vs. The Commissioner of Income-Tax .... Respondent Bombay City IV Ms. Asifa Khan for Applicant. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 29TH AUGUST, 2007 DATE : 29TH AUGUST, 2007 DATE : 29TH AUGUST, 2007 P.C. . In view of CBDT Circular as the tax incidence is less than Rs.4.00 lakhs, learned Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Appeal. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. The question of law, if any, is left open for consideration in an appropriate case. Refund of Court Fees as per Rules. Certified copy expedited. ( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) ( F.I. REBELLO, J.) ( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) ( F.I. REBELLO, J.) ( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) ( F.I. REBELLO, J.)