IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9653 of 2010 1. ASHOK YADAV S/O DAYAL YADAV R/O VILLAGE- DHANJAIYA, P.S.- DEO, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD 2. BAIDNATH THAKUR S/O LATE PUNIT THAKUR R/O VILLAGE-GAURA, P.S.- AMBAD, DISTRICT-AURANGABAD 3. RAM JANAM MEHTA S/O LATE BALDEO MAHTO R/O VILLAGE-GAURA P.S.-AMBA, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. KAMESHWAR BAITHA S/O LATE SAMPAT BAITHA R/O VILLAGE CHANDAUT, P.S.- AMBA, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD. ----------- 2. 02.12.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioners seeks quashing of the order dated 18.2.2010 passed in Cr. Rev. No. 63 of 2009, 05 of 2010 by Additional District and Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-I, Aurangabad, by which he has ordered a further inquiry in protest-cum-complaint case no. C27 of 2009. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no dispute that the Revisional Court could have ordered ever further inquiry in the matter but provided the petitioners had an opportunity of hearing. Since a point of law has been raised on behalf of the petitioners matter is remanded to the Additional District and Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-I, Aurangabad, to pass afresh order after hearing both the parties. With these observations the application is disposed off. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )