IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 16TH JULY 2010 / 25TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 22247 of 2010(E) -------------------------------- I.A.48/10 IN RCP.36/2006 of RENT CONTROL COURT,PONNANI .................... PETITIONER(S): ----------------- T.P.KUNHU S/O. THOROPARAMBIL BAVA, AGED 46 YEARS, (FRIENDS FOOTWEAR, PALAKKAD ROAD, EDAPPAL, CHUNGAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT), CHERUKUDANGAD AMSOM, PARUDOOR DESOM IN OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKD DISTRICT, PIN 679305. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. FATHIMA W/O.LATE MUHAMMED, UDINIKKARA DESOM, VATAMKULAM AMSOM, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DSITRICT, PIN-679576. 2. MUFASHID S/O.LATE MUHAMMED, UDINIKKARA DESOM, VATTAMKULAM AMSOM, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679576. 3. ABOOBACKER S/O.LATE MUHAMMED, UNINIKKARA DESOM, VATTAMKULAM AMSOM, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679576. 4. MUFASHIR S/O.LATE MUHAMMED, UDINIKKARA DESOM, VATTAMKULAM AMSOM, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679576. WPC.22247/10 -2- 5. NOOH SALIM S/O.LATE MUHAMMED, UDINIKKARA DESOM, VATTAMKULAM AMSOM, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DSITRICT PIN-679576. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/07/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C. K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ W. P. C. No.22247 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 16th day of July, 2010 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J Under challenge in this Writ Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the tenant is Ext.P5 order by which the Rent Control Court has allowed amendment of the Rent Control Petition for the purpose of correcting the Door Number of the building in question as well the boundary description to a limited extent. 2. Even though, several grounds have been raised in the memorandum of Writ Petition and Sri.Rajesh Sivaramankutty, the learned counsel for the Writ Petitioner addressed arguments W. P. C. No.22247 of 2010 -2- before us based on the various grounds, we do not find any justification for invoking the visitorial jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 for interfering with the impugned order. After all, by the impugned order the learned Rent Control Court has only permitted the landlord to correct the Door Number and boundary description of the scheduled building in a case where there was no confusion for the tenant regarding the identity of the building covered by the lease. 3. We dismiss the Writ Petition. However, we direct the Rent Control Court to permit the revision petitioner to file his additional objections, if any, to the RCP before he commences adducing evidence on his side. If the Writ Petitioner files additional objections within five days from today, W. P. C. No.22247 of 2010 -3- the Rent Control Court will receive those objections to file. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE C. K. ABDUL REHIM JUDGE kns/-