IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4792 of 2009 Sudhir Kumar Sah, son of Late Ramashish Sah, Resident of Mohalla-Ward No. 6, Ambedkar Nagar, Dalsingsarai, District-Samastipur. ……..Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Urban Development Department, Govt. of Bihar,Patna. 2. The Dalsingsarai Nagar Panchayat through its Executive Officer, Dalsingsarai, District-Samastipur. 3. The Executive Officer, Dalsingsarai Nagar Panchayat, Dalsingsarai, District-Samastipur. ……Respondents. ----------- 2. 16. 04. 09. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he retired from service from Respondent No. 2 with effect from 31st July, 2005 and he has not received full retiral dues till date. On perusal of Annexure-12, the order passed by the Lokayukt, Bihar, Patna, before whom the petitioner had earlier approached for the relief as prayed for in this case. Upon hearing the petitioner the matter was disposed of as indicated by the petitioner as per letter dated 9th February, 2009. It appears that on perusal of the said order, a report was submitted by Respondent No. 3, wherein it was stated that other retirement dues except the gratuity and leave encashment have been paid. The leave encashment and gratuity are not payable to the petitioner in view of the fact that the decision for payment of the aforesaid retiral benefits were taken by the Board (Respondent No.2) with effect from 31. 1. 2007 and the petitioner retired on 31. 7. 2005 and as such those two benefits are not permissible to the petitioner. As regards claim of medical allowances, petitioner was - 2 - given liberty to file representation. Considering the above learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are some grievances which have also not been redressed by Respondent No. 2. In the above circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to file representation before Respondent No. 3 giving relevant details as well as supportive documents in support of his claim within a period of six weeks along with certified copy of the present order. Upon such consideration, in case the representation is filed, Respondent No. 3 shall consider the same and disposed of the representation filed by the petitioner by a reasoned order considering the relevant documents expeditiously preferably within four months on receipt of representation. With the above observations, this writ application is disposed of. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)