IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11012/2008 Decided on:20.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Shashi Bala. …Petitioner. Versus H.P. State Electricity Board and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that the employer is giving fictional breaks and not paying salary for the vacation period. This question is no more res integra in view of the the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in Baldev Singh and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, CWP No. 415 of 2000, decided on 1st September, 2008. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents not to give fictional breaks to the petitioner and pay salary of the vacation period in view of the principles laid down in the above cited judgment within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 20.12.2010 *awasthi*