HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2187 of 2011 Date:08.09.2011 Between: A.Govinda Rao ..... Petitioner AND The State of A.P., Reptd by its Principal Secretary, Women Development and Child Development Department, Hyderabad and Three others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt P.Revathi Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP for Women Development and Child Welfare Counsel for Respondent No.4: Dr.P.B.Vijaykumar The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned reply of the 4th respondent, dated 16.05.2010, as null, void, inoperative and non est in the eye of law, illegal and violative of the principles of natural justice and consequently, direct the 4th respondent to issue supply orders as per the agreement, dated 06.04.2010.” At the hearing, Smt P.Revathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that as the contract period has come to an end by 31.05.2011, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.Nos.2710, 2711 and 2712 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim reliefs are dismissed as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 08th September, 2011 DR