1 CA4606/11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Criminal Application No. 4606 of 2011 (Sagar Balasaheb Sase & Ors. v. The State & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. N.B. Narwade, Advocate, h/f Mr. A.Y. Pandule, Advocate for the applicants Mr. B.V. Wagh, APP for the respondent / State PER COURT : 1. Heard the learned Advocates of both sides. 2. The applicants apprehend their arrest in connection with Crime No. I – 120 of 2011 at Sonai Police Station, Taluka Newasa, District Ahmednagar. The police in the course of investigation recorded statements of various persons and in particular statement of Swati, who happens to be the wife of complainant. Applicant No. 1 Sagar is brother of said Swati, and in her statement recorded on 25th August, 2011, said Swati has mentioned about the conversation between her and said Sagar, which if read, goes to show that said Sagar had admitted with Swati about abduction of Avinash and that he was in their custody. 3. No doubt, applicant Nos. 2 to 4 are not named in the F.I.R. and they are named as unknown 2 CA4606/11 persons. In my view, looking to the papers, which are produced, the custodial interrogation of these persons is required. Even identification parade is also required to be conducted. So far as applicant Nos. 2 to 4 are concerned, in the course of identification parade, their identity can be fixed. For the aforesaid reasons, I am inclined to reject the application. 4. In view of above, application stands rejected. 14th Nov. 11 ( R.Y. GANOO, J. ) SRM/