IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31789 of 2010 CHAND YADAV, S/o Late Hariballav Yadav. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 21.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 379, 427, 307 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Considering that the petitioner kept absconding for three years even though he was named in the First Information Report, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case shall not be bifurcated for purposes of commitment or framing of charge in case it is done the petitioner’s prayer for bail shall not be considered by this Court. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)