THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition Nos.25153 and 25643 of 2006 Dated:8th November, 2006 W.P.No.25153 of 2006 Between: M/s. Crescent Controls Private Limited, A company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act. …..PETITIONER AND Union of India, Ministry of Defence, South Block, New Delhi and others. ….RESPONDENTS W.P.No.25643 of 2006 Between: M/s. Crescent Controls Private Limited, A company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act. …..PETITIONER AND Union of India, Ministry of Defence, South Block, New Delhi and others. ….RESPONDENTS THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI W.P.Nos.25153 and 25643 of 2006 COMMON ORDER: W.P.No.25153 of 2006 has been filed seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents in not furnishing the tender schedules to the petitioner in respect of Tender No.RCI/DCMM/TP/0439 dt. 31.10.2006 for the development of the large thrust vibrator system (16000 kgf) as illegal, arbitrary. This court on 4-12-2006 while ordering notice before admission passed an order as under: “Post after one week. Since no pre qualifications are prescribed in the tender notice dt.31.10.2006, the respondents are directed to furnish the tender schedules to the petitioner forthwith. In case, there is any objection to issue the tender schedules, the same shall be informed to the petitioner in writing forthwith.” Alleging that in spite of directions of this Court the tender schedules have not been furnished and on the other hand the respondents are taking further steps pursuant to the tender notice, W.P.No.25643 of 2006 is filed. Shri A. Rajasekhar Reddy, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India who took notice for the respondents under instructions stated that the respondents have decided not to process the impugned Tender No.RCI/DCMM/TP/0439 dt. 31.10.2006. It is also stated that the process of procurement in which the last date was fixed as 11-12-2006 is being closed. The statement of Shri A. Rajasekhar Reddy, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India that the tender notice itself has been rescinded is placed on record and accordingly both the writ petitions are closed. No costs. ______________ (G.ROHINI,J) Date:8th November, 2006. grk