IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.48 of 2009 RAM EKBAL SINGH, SON OF LATE RAJDEO SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RATANPURA, POST OFFICE & POLICE STATION MOTIPUR, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR …….PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE COMMISSIONER, TIRHUT DIVISION, MUZAFFARPUR 4. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, TIRHUT RANGE, MUZAFFARPUR 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUZAFFARPUR 6. THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, MUZAFFARPUR 7. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MUZAFFARPUR 8. THE LAND REFORMS DEPUTY COLLECTOR (EAST), MUZAFFARPUR 9. THE CIRCLE OFFICER MUSHAHARI, MUZAFFARPUR 10. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, MUSHAHARI POLICE STATION, MUZAFFARPUR ……RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 10.02.2009 This application has been filed for a direction to the respondents to withdraw the First Information Report pertaining to Mushahari P.S.case No.99 of 2008. Mr. Amresh Kumar Singh, appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in view of the judgment and decree passed by a competent Civil Court, the informant ought not to have lodged the First Information Report G.P. XVI, appears on behalf of the State. This is the defence of the petitioner, which deserves to be examined at the time of investigation. I am of the opinion that no direction for withdrawing the First Information Report can be granted on this ground. Needless to state that the plea taken by the petitioner shall be examined during the course of investigation. 2 I do not find any merit in the application and it is dismissed in limine with the observation aforesaid. Narendra/ (Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, ACJ.)