cip H{GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petitlon (S\ No. 1^7 of 2008 Petitioner Mohammad Ismail, S/o Mohammad Yasin, 65 years, Retd. Head Cteric, Mjnlng Collectorate, Dantewada, Distt. Dantewada, (C.G.), R/o Ganga Nagar, near Geedam Naka, Jagdaipur, Distt. Bastar(C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. Stste of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Mining Department, Mantralaya, Ralpur (C.G.) 2. The Accountant General (C.G.), Pagariya Compiex, Pandri. Raipur (C.G.). . 3. Ths Dsrector, MiRing & Geoiogy Department, Sonakhan Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Collector, South Bastar. Dantewada (C.G.) WRtT PETtTOIN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTiON OF INDIA Singie Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Prafull Bharat, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Smitha Ghai, Panel Lawyerforthe respondents No. 1,3 and 4. Smt. B. Maithi, Advocate on the authority ofShri S. K. Beriwal, Standing Counsel for the respondent No.2. ORALORDER (Passsd on this 4th day ofAprii. 2008) 1. Wtth the consent of leamed counsel appearing for the parties, the matter js heard finally. 2. This matter pertains to retrial dues. 3. This Court in the matter of Writ Petition No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandat Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & others) and other connected matters, decided on 31.1.2008. directed the Committee to consider the matter of retrial dues as the disputed question of facts were jnvolved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.6.2006 passed in W.P.No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai h^ 4. 5. ® Chandrakar Vs. State Government and others) and order dated 13.3.20(^ passecl jn M.C.C. No. 105/2CK)8 (State of Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition js squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31 of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & others) anct other connected matters, as submitled by tearned counsel appearing for the parties. With the consent of the parties, thls petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms j.e. the ofRce of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, withjn a period of 15 days from ttie date of recejpt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Commjttee shatt issue noticeto the petitioner and the officers concerned, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shaIS consider and pass order, in accordance with Saw, after affording proper opportynity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officer concerned may fite additionaJ documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, induding payment of retrial dues, if any. to the petitioner be compteted within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitjoner shall supply extra copy of the petition to leamed counsel appearing for the respective respondents. for onward transmjssion to the said commjttee. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Thakur