1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.04.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD)No.4234 of 2011 M.Muthiah : Petitioner Vs. 1.The Regional Manager (TASMAC), Plot No.100, Anna Nagar, Madurai. 2.The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., (TASMAC) Rameswaram Main Road, Manalur, Madurai Region, Madurai. : Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 07.03.2011 sent by the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.M.V.Venkataseshan For Respondents : Mr.J.Ravindran Standing Counsel ******** ORDER ****** Mr.J.Ravindran, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition for a Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider his representation dated 07.03.2011. 3. The case of the petitioner is that based on his educational qualification, he was appointed as a Shop Supervisor by proceeding dated 28.11.2009. Thereafter, twice, he was transferred to Shop Nos.5448 and 5470. While he was working in shop No.5470, he and two others were placed under suspension by the second respondent through his proceeding dated 28.12.2006 on the ground that while auditing in the said shop, there was a shortage of amount. On enquiry, the second respondent found that the petitioner was not responsible for the alleged shortage of money. The petitioner, therefore, sent a representation to the first respondent and requested him to post him as a Shop Supervisor in the shop, where he was originally employed. The first respondent has forwarded the same to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 second respondent. But, however, no orders have been passed. Hence, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present Writ Petition for the reliefs stated earlier. 4. Considering the limited scope of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the claim made by the petitioner, I direct the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 07.03.2011 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The Writ Petition stands ordered accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (Accounts) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The Regional Manager (TASMAC), Plot No.100, Anna Nagar, Madurai. 2.The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., (TASMAC) Rameswaram Main Road, Manalur, Madurai Region, Madurai. +1 CC TO MR. J. RAVINDRAN, ADVOCATE S.R NO. 13293 Order made in W.P.(MD)No.4234 of 2011 Dated:- 09.04.2011 SML PAM 27.04.2011/4C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/