1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2756 OF 2010 Sanjay Narayan Mahajan ..Petitioner -VERSUS- Swati Sanjay Mahajan ..Respondent .... Mr.V.P. Patil, Advocate for petitioner. .... (CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) DATE : 17th June, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. The petitioner filed applications (Exhibit-22 and Exhibit-27). The petitioner is husband of respondent. The respondent filed divorce petition, which is pending before the family Court. The petitioner had filed proceedings for restitution of conjugal rights. His application for restitution of conjugal rights was dismissed, and therefore, he had preferred the appeal, which is pending before the High Court. On that ground, he sought stay to the proceedings filed by the wife seeking divorce. The learned Judge of family Court rejected his applications. The proceedings before the family Court and the proceedings before the High Court are of different character. It is desirable that matrimonial dispute 2 shall be expeditiously disposed of, and therefore, rejection of petitioner's applications could not be faulted with. No substance. The petition is dismissed. The petitioner is at liberty to seek interim relief in his appeal, if it is permissible under law. (V.R.KINGAONKAR) JUDGE gas/wp2756.10