£NTHEHIGHCQURT QF JUDICATURE AT BILASPURfC.G.l W.P. N0.^.^,1../20Q3 Sinflie Seoch PETITIONER ^y^" ^' RESPONDENTS ^a^ ^ss^ ^^^ Smt. Karuna Dubey Aged about 39 years W/0 Shri Narendra Kumar Dubey R/0 CivilLines Mahasarru-ind District Mafaasainund Posted as Assistant Professor (Chemistry) Government College Mahasamund District Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh Through the Principal Secretary' Departraent of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Additional Secretary Government of C.G. Higher Education, Technical Education, Man Power Resources Science Industrial Department, DKS Bhavan Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Principal Government College Mafaasainund District Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) Principal Government College Dantewada Distt. Dantewada (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ENFORCEMENT OF LEGAL RIGHTS OF THE PETITIONER BY WAY OF ISSUANCE QF ANY. WRIT OR DIRECTION OR ORDER. HIOH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Pcttttoa No. 3091irf2003 Petittoner : Smt Karuna Dubey Vcrsus Respoadents : StateofCliIiattisgarIi&ofliexs Waa^e Bendi: HoaT)le Mr. Justkse SilUdi K. Ajsnttotrt. Shri Anand KmnarTiwari, counsel for fhe PetitMMicr. Shri Paiakaj Sluwasteva, Panel lawyra- fiw Ihe Bespondents/StErte. ORDBR (32nd Fd>ruaiy, 2006) The pctitiDDer was woxkmg as Assistant Rrofesaor (Cheinisti^ in the Oovenunwnt CoBcge, Oistrict-Ehug. Vide ixnpugncd transfer dated 16.9.2003 he was teanaferred to fhe Oovenuaent OoBegc, Dantewada. Thc petitioaer has fited fltis petition aapi^amg the transfer otder dated 16.9.2003 on fhe ground fhat there was no adiBinisteatwc exigeacy. This Coiut by interim orier dated 29.10.2003 directed fhat fhe petyfoner shoirid iiot be rdieved fi»mthe |»pesentplace <rf postixig, if atoeady not reBeved, tiB fhe next date ofhearmg. Leamed counsel for fhe petitioaer subanits fhat by virtue of flus (xnut's oricr dated 29.10.2003, fhe petitioner has coatinucd Mt tfae saaie oVt ftoss of posting and the impugned oider was xiever giwen eSeat to in respectofthe petitfaner. The petitioiier has been granted Saal »eltefbyinterim oider. It ia weU settled prmcipte oflaw that transfer is an mcadent of semcc and it is for ttie aaaployer to dccnie as to whrae a partknriar ofiBcer/aBipkyce be posted kecping in wiew pubUc inteaest as weB as adnmusteatwe exigency. This Court haa Bnrited jurtedietinn to 5. BiM'u mterfere ia the transfer laatter and fhte Court can interferc oiity ia the case ofproved malafide, aon-conipetence ofauthority passa^; fhe teansfer order and teansfer oider not being in con&rmily with fhe rulcs and regiilations. Thc pctitiDner/einployee caazust be pennitted to remain at one place, forever, by Court otders. At fliis stage, it is itotneccssaiytoexammcvalidityoffhetiaasfiifonler. lathefiictsof the csae, the respondeats are duccted not to insfet upon compliaiK* offhe impugned teansfer ordcr. This petition has become infructuous with fhe pasaaye of time. AcfxvSiayfy the petition is dismissed as havit^ bccome infiiictuous. However, ttie nsspoadents/aufhorities are at libtiriy to pass appiopriate order Sas posting fhe petitioner in the pubMc interest and adniixustratwe exigency, in accoidance wifh law. No oxdcr as to <»sts. Sd/- Satish K..Agnihotri Judge