IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM NO. M-6079 OF 2011 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 05.04.2011 Harjit Singh ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Rai, AAG, Punjab. Mr. B. D. Sharma, Advocate, for the complainant. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) The allegations against the petitioner are that he embezzled ` 5500/- only. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that reasons for false implication of the petitioner are that he filed complaint against owner of the finance company and the complainant, after conniving with the finance company, has got registered the FIR after two years of the transaction. So, without commenting on the merits of the case, the order dated 25.02.2011 is made absolute. Disposed of. APRIL 05, 2011 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE