CWP(T) No. 4560/2008 (OA 1729/97) 30.4.2009 Present: Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Bhubnesh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Vivek Thakur, Addl. Advocate General and Mr. Anil Jaswal, Dy. Advocate General for the respondents. The petitioner is claiming regularisation w.e.f. 1982. The respondents in their reply have annexed the chart indicating that in the year 1990 the petitioner had worked only for 78 days. This fact stands unrebutted. Respondents in their reply have also stated that keeping in view the policy decision based on the judgment delivered by the Apex Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, 1994 Supp (2) SCC 316, the petitioner would be considered for regularisation on its turn in accordance with law. The petition was filed in the year 1997. By now the petitioner is fully eligible for the benefits of the various schemes/ policy of the State Government. In the facts and circumstances it is directed that if the benefits have already not been accorded to the petitioner same shall be immediately done in accordance with law within a period of two months from today. With these observations the present petition stands disposed of. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. April 30, 2009 (PK)