: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.17 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12 OF 2008 IN S.C.SUIT (ST.) NO.2061 OF 2007 Dennis Albert Gomes & Anr. ....Appellants V/s. Swaran Salaria & Anr. ....Respondents Mr.Y.T. Dube for the Appellants. None for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 29TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. : 1. The impugned order does not warrant any interference in view of the statement on behalf of the concerned Defendants to the effect that they are carrying on construction on CTS No.14 and not on the Plaintiffs’ property. Thus accepting this statement no order are passed. On the other hand it is apparent had it been found that the construction activities were on the Plaintiffs’ property namely CTS No.5-A (part), the matter may have been decided differently. If it is the Plaintiffs’ grievance at any stage that in fact the construction is being carried on CTS : 2 : No.5-A (part) the Plaintiffs are always at liberty to adopt proceedings in accordance with law. The Plaintiffs are at liberty to have the D.I.L.R. demarcate their property at their expenses. There is no doubt that if such an application is made, the D.I.L.R. will act in accordance with law. 2. With the above clarification, the Appeal from order is accordingly disposed of. The Civil Application is also accordingly disposed of.