1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2442 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1095 OF 2006 Yeshwant Narhar Sawant .. Plaintiffs Vs. Pramod Suryaji Kharade and Ors. .. Defendants Mr.Ashutosh M. Kulkarni for the plaintiffs CORAM : S.C.Dharmadhikari, J. DATE : October 12, 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard Mr.Kulkarni appearing on behalf of the applicant. 2. Perused the Civil Application. From the perusal thereof, it is apparent that the consent terms have been duly signed and filed in this court pursuant to which the order disposing of the subject writ petition has been passed. 3. Mr.Kulkarni's submission is that after the consent terms were executed the original petitioner instead of running the liquour shop and utilizing the license himself has purported to transfer it in favour of the third party / 2 opponent no.6. 4. In my view, neither the disposal of the writ petition nor the consent terms therein would prevent the applicant from approaching the authorities under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1959 and bringing to their notice the breach of the terms and conditions if any, of the license and such authorities would look into the grievance and complaint in that behalf. Further, I have no doubt in my mind that they will take necessary steps in accordance with law so as to prevent breach of any statutory provisions, rules and violation of the terms and conditions of the license. They will examine the grievance in that behalf and take necessary steps without being influenced by the disposal of the writ petition in terms of the consent terms. ( S.C.Dharmadhikari, J. )