IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2011 / 19TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26766 of 2011(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- 1. AMIT.T.K, S/O.T.P. KRISHNAKUMAR, AGED 22 YEARS, RESIDING AT SREENARAYANA BHAVAN, WEST YAKKARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. APARNA R. MENON, CHERUPALA HOUSE, KANNANTHARA, CHITTUR.P.O, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. HEMANTH.S, ASWATHI, ATHANIPARAMBU, OLAVAKKOD.P.O, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 4. ANOOP.M, MOHANAM, SASTHAPURAM, VARODE.P.O, KOTTAYI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 5. AMAL JOSEPH JACOB, KALLARACKAL HOUSE, KADAMPAZHIPURAM.P.O, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.SHAMSEERA. C.ASHRAF RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O, MALAPPURM-673 635. R1& R2 BY ADV.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC, FOR CALICUT UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: MM WP(C).No. 26766 of 2011(U) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT-P1-TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE IST PETITIONER DATED 18/08/2011. EXHIBIT-P2- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 18/08/2011. EXHIBIT-P3- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER DATED 18/08/2011. EXHIBIT-P4- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 18/08/2011. EXHIBIT-P5- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 5TH PETITIONER DATED 18/08/2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE MM ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).26766/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 11th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of the failed answer scripts in the 8th semester B.Tech Electrical and Electronics Engineering Examination vide Exts.P1 to P5 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs