HIGH coum‘ on cuHA'rrIsaARH mmrun mums: No. ssoz otzoo'r,‘ PETITIONER Govind Prasad Dewangan, s/o $h1i Samarlr Ram, ageé about 44 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. primmy School - Chandaipara, Block“ " Bamhm‘dih, Distt. Janjy'r. Champa (C.G.) Versus State of. Chhattisgarh, Thmugh: Secmtmy, Department of Education D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Dishict Education 0&cer, Distt.Janjgir Chmpa (C.G.) . 3 Block Education Of&cer, Block - Bamhnidih, Distt. Janjg'r Champa, (C.G.) L (Wgit retition undeg Artkae 2267 9f the ¢on9utuuen o1 India} . Appearanee:’ Shn' Anil Singh Rajput, counsel &r the 'peix'h‘oncr. Shn' A.S. Kachhawaha, Govt. Advocate, for the State on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (20.09.2007) SUN“. KUMAR SIM-IA, J. Heard on admission. Lcalned counsel for the petitioner submim. that the petitioner has passed D.Ed. examinmionwon‘his own cxpensea, therefom, he is? entitled to mccive two advance increments accoxdingto cimulaxs datea 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999.‘He also submits that in many identical matters, the petitionshave been allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar B a Vs. ,Ca Dam andauothcr {2006 (m MPJR-CG 96}. He mbmits‘thatk: . the case of the petitioner is squamly coveted by the said Judgment. This legal position knot disputed by the learned counsel v' for the State. However, he submits that the order may‘ be passed in terms of the said judgmengbut it shall be, subjected, >, to verihcation regarding petitioner’s suchqualincation. Accordingly, this writ pctmonxs Wedv in case of Yashlvant order passed Mumapai Comoratiom Durg vermcation of the acquired D.E&. Examination, Certmcate yer cixculal’s dated in ms of the Kumar Bharadtvaj Vs. and another {Supra} subject to facts‘ as to whether the Wane: had“ and G1.0.3.1999 and further 24.12. 1998 osed of. No cider aa to W l whether he has baen paid ,two mlvance The petition costs. standammlly disp increments or not. Sd/— Judge w‘g.@.3a. 550m omhis awnexpenses as J i $ ; Sunil Kumar Sinha \ L