IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40914 of 2008 Md. Jahid, son of Abdul Latif Marhum, village Ranipur, PS Benipatti, district Madhubani – Petitioner. Vs. 1) The State of Bihar, 2) Naseema Khatoon, daughter of Md. Sakir, village Ranipur, Matarhari, Ps Benipatti, District Madhubani – Opp. Parties. 2 29.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. This application appears to be premature as it has been filed for quashing M.R. Case No. 22/2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner who is the father-in-law has been made party in the maintenance case. This aspect of the matter should be considered by the court at appropriate stage in the aforesaid case. The court shall call the parties personally, hear them and try to resolve the differences or allow them to make settlement in favour of the wife-victim lady if the court finds that she is entitled for the same. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)