IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2247 of 2011 SAHINDRA SAHANI, SON OF RAM UCHIT SAHANI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MALIKAN PAGAHIA, P.S. SARAIYA, DISTT. MUZAFFARPUR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.02.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband of the deceased is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 304B and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that marriage was performed two years back of the occurrence and there was a demand of motorcycle. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Informant has retracted from his initial version and has supported the defence version that the victim died due to accidental fire. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the father-in-law and other members of the family who are granted anticipatory bail in which the Informant has been directed to become one of the bailors in that case, let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner in the same manner, if the petitioner appears within six weeks. With these observations, the application is disposed of. S.Ali/ Fahad. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) 2