IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28015 of 2009 DROUPADI DEVI, Wife of Bhagwan Sharma, resident of village – Rangown, P.S. Tarapur, District – Munger. …. Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Suman Sharma, Son of Sumit Sharma. 3. Uma Kant Sharma, Son of Manohar Sharma. Both are resident of village – Rangown, P.S. Tarapur, District – Munger. …. Opp. Parties., ----------- 03/ 11.11.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the Opposite Parties. Prayer for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the Opposite Parties No. 2 and 3 is made on behalf of the petitioner on the ground that facts were suppressed before this Court. Counsel for the Opposite parties giving details of different paragraphs of anticipatory bail application has stated that nothing was suppressed. All events are clearly stated in the bail application. In the impugned order of the Sessions Judge also the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has been mentioned. Despite the fact considering the change statement of the informant’s daughter at different places O.Ps. were granted anticipatory bail. It is stated that after their anticipatory bail the O.Ps. have never misused the same. - 2 - Considering these facts, the application filed by the petition for cancellation of bail granted to the O.Ps. 2 and 3 is rejected. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)