H IGH COURT OF UTTARANCH AL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1241 (S/ S) 2004 Anrath Singh Parihar S/ o Late P.S. Parihar, R/ o Parihar Palace Bala Hisar, Mussoorie. … Petitioner Versus 1. Uttaranchal Pay Jal, Through its Managing Director, Dehradun, Uttaranchal, 2. The Managing Director, Uttaranchal Sansadhan Vikas and Nirman Nigam, Dehradun, Uttaranchal. 3. U.P. Jal Nigam, Through its Managing Director, 6- Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow. … Respondents Sri S.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri D.S. Patni, learned counsel for respondents. H on ’ble M.M. Gh ild iya l, J . Heard Sri S.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri D.S. Patni, learned counsel for the respondents. Both the parties are agreed that the writ petition may be decided finally at this stage. The petitioner is working as Junior Engineer, Camp Office C & D.S. Unit 19, New Tehri in Uttaranchal Pay Jal Nigam and claims that his case is also covered by the decision given by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Sukhdev Singh Mehta vs. State of Uttaranchal and others in w.p. no. 860 (S/ B) 2001 decided on 05.10.2001. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the case is covered by the aforesaid decision. Learned counsel for the parties agreed that direction may be given to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the aforesaid judgment and if the case of the petitioner is covered by the aforesaid decision, he be given benefits thereof and his name be included in appropriate place in the seniority list. Let the necessary exercise be done within a period of six weeks from today. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the decision given by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Sukhdev Singh Mehta vs. State of Uttaranchal and others in w.p. no. 860 (S/ B) 2001 decided on 05.10.2001. (M.M. Gh ild iya l, J .) November 30, 2004: NCM: