IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 848 of 2008 Pankaj Kumar S/o Ramdayal ......... Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ......... Respondents Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for respondent No.3. 2. Shri Amit Bhatt, the learned Addl. G.A. submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case submitted the chargesheet against the petitioners before the Circle Officer concerned on 07/11/2008 and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit chargesheet before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicated in para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 03.11.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 02.12.2008 Shiv