IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36321 of 2008 ***** OM PRAKASH SALUJA @ OM PRAKASH SINGH @ PAPPU SINGH , S/o Govind Singh and Satnam Kaur, W/o Om Prakash Saluja, both R/o Village- Gurudwara Road, P.S. Kotwali, District – Gaya Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.11.2008. Heard. In Title Suit No. 69/05/332/05, instituted by the husband of the complainant, he seeks a declaration that the power of attorney purported to have been granted by him in favour of the defendant in the suit is invalid for the reasons indicated in the plaint filed in the said suit. In the complaint filed on 22.8.2005, the complainant has alleged that the said power of attorney was obtained by the petitioners by intoxicating the husband of the complainant and on the basis of the said power of attorney, property belonging to the husband of the complainant had been sold without any consideration paid to him. Considering these aspects of the matter and taking into account of the fact that a Civil Suit relating to the same - 2 - issue is pending, the application for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender of the petitioners within six weeks from today, let the petitioners, Om Prakash Saluja @ Om Prakash Singh @ Pappu Singh and Satnam Kaur be released on bail on their furnishing bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 1164/2005, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. dk ( Barin Ghosh, J. )