1 CRAPP. NO.330-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.330 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2208 OF 2010 Mrs. Sunita D/o. Mahukar Meshram ..Applicant. V/s. The Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. R.M. Daga with Pooja Thorat for applicant. Mr.A.S. Gadkari for respondent No.1. Ms. S.V. Gajjare, A.P.P. for respondent-State. Ms. P.H. Kantharia for respondent Nos.2 & 3. CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR AND U.D.SALVI, JJ. DATED : 15TH SEPTEMBER, 2010 P.C. :- 1. The explanation offered in the application is unacceptable - as no reason is forthcoming as to what prevented the Advocate on record to make alternative arrangement atleast to intimate the Court about the non availability of the Advocate. However, as the litigant should not suffer for the mistake of the 2 CRAPP. NO.330-10 Advocate, this application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 8(a) on the condition that the Advocate on record shall personally pay costs quantified at Rs.1000/- to the High Court Legal Services Authority within one week from today. The payment of costs is condition precedent for showing indulgence. 2. If the cost is paid in time, the main matter be listed on 1st October, 2010. (U.D.SALVI, J.) (A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)