IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21921 of 2010 RINKU KUMARI @ RINKU DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.6.2010. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Ara (Town) P.S.Case No.14 of 2010 for offence punishable under Sections 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, sections 120B and 412 of the Indian Penal Code were added to the set of allegations. Substance of allegation as set out in the first information report is that a dacoity was committed in the Oriental Bank of Commerce, Hospital Road, Ara and in which the dacoits looted away a sum of Rs.26,40,965/. On the basis of the statement made by one of the co-accused, namely, Durgesh Sharma, the name of the husband of the petitioner transpired in the present case and upon search being made from his residential house, a sum of Rs.2,32,500/- was recovered. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has roped in the present proceeding simply because she happens to 2 the wife of the said Satyendra Sinha alias Chhotu who had been named in the confessional statement given by Durgesh Sharma alias Rahul @ Raju, co- accused in the present proceeding. He submits that the recovery of the amount in question cannot connect the petitioner with the alleged offence. Taking into consideration the circumstances and the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner Rinku Kumari alias Rinku Devi be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Ara (Town) P.S.Case No.14 of 2010 (G.R.No.119 of 2010). ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)