IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION (C-482) No. 946 of 2011 with Compounding Application No. 1245 of 2011 1. Tajendra Gill S/o Late Hardev Singh R/o Simli, Laksar P.S.Laksar, District Hardwar 2. Parvinder S/o Sitam Singh R/o Village Akoda Kalan P.S.Laksar, District Hardwar 3. Sandeep @ Chiku S/o Anup Singh R/o Village Akoda Kalan P.S.Laksar, District Hardwar 4. Gurdeep S/o Sitam Singh R/o Village Akoda Kalan P.S.Laksar, District Hardwar 5. Naveen Saini S/o Suman R/o Roorkee District Hardwar 6. Amar Partap S/o Sitaram R/o Loko Colony P.S.Laksar, District Hardwar 7. Sanjeev Rana S/o Jal Singh R/o Railway Colony Roorkee District Hardwar 8. Rajeev Rana S/o Jal Singh R/o Railway Colony Roorkee District Hardwar 2 9. Kala @ Neetu S/o Satpal R/o Society Road, Laksar P.S.Laksar, District Hardwar 10. M. Sashidhan S/o S.D.Menon R/o IRC Manager Laksar, District Hardwar ………………..Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Secretary Home, Dehradun. 3. Arun Kumar S/o Late Elam Singh R/o Society Road, Laksar P.S.Laksar, District Hardwar …...Opposite parties Shri, Mohd. Safdar, Advocate, present for the petitioners. Shri B.S.Parihar, Brief Holder present for the State. Shri, Parikshit Saini, Advocate, present for respondent no.2 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard. (2) By means of this petition, moved under section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioners have sought quashing of the proceedings 3 of Criminal Case No. 1268 of 2011, (old case no. 387 of 2010) State vs. Tajendra Gill and others relating to offences punishable under section 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 504, and 506 I.P.C., Police Station Laksar, District Hardwar, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Laksar. (3) There are cross cases of the incident. It is pointed out that on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners, and learned counsel for the complainant that parties have entered into compromise. This fact is also mentioned in the charge sheet. Since the offence punishable under section 307 I.P.C., is non compoundable offence, this court is not inclined to interfere with the trial of the case on the ground of the compromise. (4) In the above circumstances, the petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C., is dismissed with the observation that if the petitioners namely Tajendra Gill, Parvinder, Sandeep @ Chiku, Gurdeep, Naveen Saini, Amar Partap, Sanjeev Rana, Rajeev Rana, Kala @ Neetu and M. Sashidhan surrender before the court concerned, their bail application shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay, keeping in mind that there are cross cases of the incident, and both the sides have entered into compromise. 4 (Compounding Application No. 1245 of 2011 stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt.17.10.2011 N.P