IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 12202 of 2008. Decided on: 30th December, 2010. Nimmo Devi. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. R.K. Dogra, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Haminder Chandel, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. Mr. L.N. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 4. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate vice Mr. Y.W. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No. 5. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has assailed the appointments of respondents No. 3 to 5 to the post of Supervisor. Case of the petitioner was duly considered by the respondents as per the averments contained in the reply. She has appeared in the written examination and thereafter, she was called to appear in the interview. However, the petitioner’s name did not figure in the merit list drawn by the respondents for the post of Supervisor. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 30, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. - 2 - - 3 -