IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32768 of 2011 Rajeeb Paswan Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 14.11.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Nalanda P.S. Case No. 43/09 for the offence under Sections 392 and 411 of the I.P.C. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R and his name has come in the confessional statement of co- accused, Hareram Paswan on that basis the petitioner has remanded in this case and other seven cases also and is in custody since 02.11.2010. It has also been submitted that while the informant has claimed to identify the miscreants on seeing again but the petitioner has not been put on T.I.P. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State while oppose the prayer of bail of the petitioner but conceded that from the impugned order whereby, prayer of bail of the petitioner has been rejected it appears that nothing has been recovered from his possession of the petitioner. Under the facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) only with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial 2 Magistrate, Nalanda in connection with Nalanda P.S. Case No. 43/09. Kamlesh (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)