^.^.'^fr8 i^ni c^- \lf^— ^^^•^.. ^-"'<^>'" ^w^,: ^-••"•"" ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (C) No.??^/2011 PETITIONER ^-: Smt. Savitri Devi Agrawal wife of Govindram Agrawal, aged about 35 years, R/o Jute MU1, Chatamuda, Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^l) Municipal Corporation, Raigarh, Through its Commissioner Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 2) CoUector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS, ORDER/ORDERS. DIRECTION /DIRECTIONS ETC. ^-£; >*a^ 8 S HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WRTT PETmON (C) No. 3767 of2011 Smt Savitri Devi ^rawal. RESPONDENTS VER8US Municipal Corporation, Raigarh & Anotlier. WMT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA 8B: Hon'ble Shri SatisA K. Aenffliotri, J. Present: Smt. Hamida Siddique, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri H.B.Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Smt. Meera Jaiswal, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Pauel Lawyer fortiie State/respondent No.2. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 14th day ofJuly, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits tfaat the petitioner has not received any notice in respect of the petition scheduled land, however, the process of demolition has already taken place by the respoindent No. 1. 2. At this juncture, Shri Agrawal, leamed senior counsel appeansg with Snrt. JaiswaJ, for the respondent No. 1 and Shri Bhaduri, leamed Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondent No. 2 submit Ifaat no demolition on the part ofthe respondent auAorities shall be taken without followmg the due proeess oflaw. 3. Ln view ofthe above, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nofhiag survives inthis petitiim for adjudication at this stage. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- ish K. Agn' Judge Amit