c^i.^32_ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, AT ~ BILASPUR fC.G\ ^y^. WRIT PETITION fS) N0. ^\3r l'/ OF2011 IS^BI PETITIONER \A^y..^ "^' ^ ...-/ ^y..-'""^ ^y PARASRAM DHRUVE,AGEDABOUT 52 YEARS, S/0 LT. SHRI DERHARAM, WORKINGAS - ASSISTANT DEVLOPMENT EXTENSION OFFICER AT JANPAD PANCHAYATCHHINDGARH DISTRICT DANTEWADA, R/0. VILLAGE SONARPAL TAHSIL JAGDALPUR,DISTRICT - BASTAR (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS tL- , 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH - ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT AND RURAL MANTRALAY, D.K. S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR -2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE QFFICER DISTRICT PANCHAYAT DANTEWADA, DISTRICT - DANTEWARA (C. G.) Writ Petition under Article - 226 of the Constitution of India. ..-':;:2%.\ /y^""%, 8, %i»t^ ¥ 1 "~^ss^ \^. ^.;.^'i ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAS WRIT PETITION (8) No. 4347 of2011, PETITIONER : ParasramDhurve. RESPONDENTS VER8US State ofChhattisgarh & Another. Ainit •WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUriON OF INDLA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Agiuhotri, J. Present: Shri P.K.Tulsyan, Advocate fbr the petitioner. Sliri Shashaiik Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 05 day ofAugiist, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for flie petitioner submits that vide ordcr dated 15.07.2010 (Annexure P/l), the petitioner, working as Assistant Development Extension Officer, at Janpad Panchayat, CiihmdgarlL District Dantewada, was transfen'ed to Janpad Panchayat, Bastm', District Jagdalpur. However, the petitioner has 2iot yet been relieved tojoin the new place ofposting. Shri Tulsyan submits that once the order oftransfer has been passed, it is for fhe govemment to ensure that it is complied witti inimediately. He relies on a decision of the Supreme Court m Sreedam Chandra G'hosh v. State ofAssam & others , m support of his contention that ifthe order is not complied with, a directioji can be issued for enforcemeiit thereof 2. Shii Thakur, leamed Panel Law>rcr appearmg for the State submits fhat that ifthe transfer order dated 15.07.2010 (Amiexure P/l) is still m cxistence and has not been complied with, appropriate steps would be taken to comply with fhe order. 3. Ifthe aforesaid transfer order is still in existence, the goveiimient is under an obligation to comply with tiie same at once. It is accordiiigly directed fhat.the transfer order shall be complied with forthwith, within a period oftwo weeks, 4» Accordmgly, this petition is disposed of Satish K. Agnihotn Judge 1(1996)10SCC567