: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.122 OF 2002 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.4018 OF 2001 G.C.P. Corporation ....Plaintiff V/s. M/s. Graphic Charts Ltd. & Ors. ....Defendants Mr.M. K. Jain for the Plaintiff. Mr.D.H. Mehta i/b Divya Shah and Associates for the Defendants. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 29TH NOVEMBER, 2005. P.C. : 1. Both the parties have agreed that the disputes and differences in the suit would be referred to sole arbitrator of Mr.D.H.Mehta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the defendants. The plaintiff and the defendants are present in the Court. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff, after taking instructions from the plaintiff, who is present in the Court, unconditionally states that he not only has no objection but is desirous that the matter be referred to the arbitration of Mr. D.H.Mehta, though he is a counsel appearing on behalf of the defendants. Accordingly, by consent of the parties, the matter is referred to the sole : 2 : arbitration of Mr. D.H.Mehta. 2. The suit is accordingly disposed off. 3. Refund as per rule. 4. Parties agreed that the sole Arbitrator shall have summary powers to assign/give reasons for the order. 5. The amount deposited in this Court by the defendants shall abide by the result of the arbitration proceedings.