IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 15959 of 2010 Date of Decision: 8.9.2010. M/s Gaur Trading Company --Petitioner Versus U.T. Chandigarh & others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. S.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion to respondents no.1 to 3 only. Ms. Smriti Dheer, Advocate present in the Court has been asked to accept notice on behalf of Mr. Sanjay Kaushal, Sr. Standing Counsel for respondents. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. A public notice was issued for auction of old material, vehicle scrap, auto batteries and tyres etc. The petitioner and the private respondents participated in the auction. It is alleged that respondent no.4 has been declared as a successful bidder, even though, he is not in possession of a valid license. Petitioner made representations (Annexures P-1 & P-2) but no decision has been taken thereon till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the representations made by the petitioner, referred to above. CWP. No. 15959 of 2010 -2- In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take decision on the representation made by the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 8.9.2010. lucky