CW 7773/06 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7773/06 Babu Lal Saini Versus State & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 22/10/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Ram Pratap Saini, for petitioner Mr. J.K. Agrawal, Addl. Govt. Counsel, for State Instant petition has been filed by petitioner seeking his fair consideration for appointment for the post of Senior Teacher [Science] which has been advertised by the respondents vide its advertisement dt.19th August, 2003. It is not disputed that petitioner is holding academic qualification for the post of Senior Teacher [Science] which is included in the Schedule appended to Rajasthan Educational Subordinate Service Rules, 1971. His only grievance is that bonus marks for teaching experience as notified by respondents in Clause 8(4) of advertisement - 08- वरीयता िनधार्रण - 04- अध् यापन अनुभव अंक - िनयुिक् त हेतु माध् यिमक िशक्षा / ूारिम् भक िशक्षा/ मामीण िवकाय एवं पंचायत राज की िशक्षण संः थाओ/संः कत िवभाग एवं राजः थान सरकार Ʈारा अनुदान ूाप् त िवघालयो में अनुदािनत पदो पर कायर्रत िशक्षक/ शारािरक िशक्षक को अध् यापन अनुभव बंक अिधकुत अिधकारी Ʈारा जारी ूमाण पऽ के आधार पर िनयमानुसार िदये जायेगे" has not been extended to him despite the fact that he too served as Para Teacher for which CW 7773/06 [2] experience certificate was also issued to him by the competent authority evident from Ann.3 for determination of merit of the applicants who have submitted applications in pursuance of advertisement dt.19th August, 2003. Certainly there is a provision for grant of bonus marks based on teaching experience that only confines to such teachers who have worked in Secondary/ Primary Education/Gramin Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Educational Institutions/Sanskrit Department and other government aided institutions as Teacher/Physical Teacher. Undisputedly, petitioner has not served as Teacher in Government/Private Aided Institution and serving as Para Teacher, in opinion of this court, will not make him entitled for grant of bonus marks based on teaching experience. This court does not find any error committed by the respondents for determining merit of the petitioner. Consequently, writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA7773CW06 22-10.doc