IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43751 of 2010 1. ANIL YADAV, Son of Bali @ Baleshwar Yadav 2. Arbind Yadav, Son of Parmeshwar Yadav 3. Mahendra Yadav, Son of Late Shankar Yadav 4. Upendra Yadav, Son of Lakhan Yadav All residents of village Baurhikala, P.S. Rajauli, District Nawadah …….. Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …. Opposite Party ----------- For the petitioners : Mr. Sidheshwar Narain Singh,Advocate For the State : Mr. Ramesh Chandra, A.P.P. ---- 2 14.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 337, 338, 307, 302, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(2) (5) S.C and S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is general and omnibus allegation against six named and 10 – 15 unknown persons in the first information report out of which two named accused persons, namely, Bali @ Baleshwar Yadav and Lakhan Yadav have been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 27.10.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 2 32680 of 2010. A copy of which has been brought on record as Annexure 2. It is also stated that the petitioners are having clean antecedents. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Nawadah in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 42 of 2010 (Spl. (H) Case No. 67/10 for petitioner nos. 1 and 2 and Spl. (H) Case No. 76/10 for petitioner nos. 3 and 4), subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below 3 will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)