IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2008 / 13TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 33231 of 2007(F) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 07/11/2007 IN IA.NO.262/2006 IN OS.84/1996 of MUNSIFF COURT, PARAVUR .................... PETITIONER: -------------------- G.BHAGAVAT SINGH, AISWARYA, NEDUNGOLAM P.O., NOW RESIDING AT "SAROJ GANGA", NEDUNGOLAM P.O., KOLLAM. BY SRI.G.BHAGAVAT SINGH (PARTY-IN-PERSON) RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. N.VIJAYAN, SANJAY BHAVAN, NEDUNGOLAM, PARAVOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 2. DAMAYANTHI SUSEELA, W/O.VIJAYAN, DO. DO. 3. SANDHYA, D/O.SUSEELA, DO. DO. 4. SANGEETHA, D/O.SUSEELA, DO. DO. 5. SANJAY, S/O.VIJAYAN, DO DO. BY ADV. SRI.C.UNNIKRISHNAN (KOLLAM) R1&2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.33231/2007 F APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGMENT IN WP9C) NOS.14130 & 17168 OF 2005 DTD. 29/07/2005 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD. 29/10/2007 IN WP(C) NO. 28782 OF 2007 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXT.P3: COPY OF APPLICATION SUBMITTED AS I.A.NO.262 OF 2007 DTD. 21/02/07 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT. EXT.P4: COPY OF OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DTD. 19/03/2007 BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 07/11/07 IN I.A.NO.262/2007 IN O.S.NO.84 OF 1996 OF MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE COURT, PARAVOOR. /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss M.N.KRISHNAN, J. -------------------------- W.P.(C). No. 33231 OF 2007 --------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT In the light of my order directing for a review and a revised order, the prayer in WPC No.33231 need not be considered because the order will cover the entire field. It is also to be stated that in the light of my review, the order passed by the learned Munsiff has become infructuous and therefore that WPC is closed. I also direct the court below to direct the Commissioner to inspect the property at the earliest and file a report within a period of six weeks and thereafter to consider the objections or the other applications filed, as the case may be, within a limited time frame and dispose it of in accordance with law. Similarly the court shall try to see that the suits are disposed of within a period of three months from the date of submission of the Commission report. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE vps