IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Writ No. 1076 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : JANUARY 29, 2010 SIKANDAR PASWAN ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: None for the petitioner(s). Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Jagjeet Beniwal, Advocate, for respondents 5 to 8. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for respondents No.5 to 8 states that the alleged detenus were working for the said respondents. They have, however, left the services. Counsel for the petitioner has not appeared. In view of the statement of learned counsel for respondents No.5 to 8, the petition is disposed of. January 29, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?