1 APPLN-973.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.973 OF 2011 Parashari Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit .... Applicant Vs. Mushtaq Kamroddin Shaikh & Anr. .... Respondents S/Shri Sachin Gite h/f M.S. Karnik for the Applicant. Ms M.R. Tidke, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: DECEMBER 14, 2011 P.C: 1. This is an application for leave to file appeal against acquittal of the respondent by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Pimpalgaon, Taluka Niphad, District Nashik on the ground that the debt which was sought to be secured by the cheque in question was time barred. Since this question is already receiving attention of a Division Bench of this Court on a reference being made by a single Judge because of conflicting Judgments, leave granted. Appeal admitted. Call for the R & P. 2 APPLN-973.11 Action under Section 390 of Cr.P.C. to follow. Needless to say, action under Section 390 means that the learned Magistrate may cause the accused to be produced before him by appropriate process and take security from them for their appearance in the Appellate Court. If the accused appear on their own, the learned Magistrate need not wait for the process to be issued or served upon the accused but shall admit them to such bail as he may deem fit. 2. The application accordingly stands disposed. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)