c^ 1(? IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) No.^°^0f 201^ ^V>lX ^arifKuarar Sinha, S/o. Shri Raj Kishore Sinha aged about 55 Years, working as Assistant . .^'^..•.•••""\ Grade-III, Tahsil Office, Kunkuri, ^^ ;^vc'l-l.^-^'kaT District Jashpur (C.G.) PETITIONER '<'-<.\\ ^\z^--' ...-•8' ^^s&:'" ^y-"" Versus RESPONDENTS, :1) State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Departinent of Hoine (Transport) D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) :2) Divisional Manager, Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation, Bilaspur (C.G.) ^ :3) Collector, Jashpur, Jashpur (C.G.) District WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA \ 2/ XI-HC—7? *<iH<'ir ^»w^» T^ •<ii^i<n^, ss>ti1^^, [®IOI<H^< .^.f..^2..2:lol[ll^ 200 ^?r TRW (TE°if35i^T) W^T^T^IW TT^T 3^T^T'iRW ^^ ^^nw Trf^r ^TT^r SB; Hon*ble Shri Majiindra M|ohan Shrivastava, J. 13.6.2011 Shri P.M. Shnvas, couns Shri N. Naha Roy, Pane copy. This petition has been account of non-consideration |led by the petitioner a^tieved on |)f his case for graiit of regular pay- scale and fbr ofher bcnefits ofpieputation/absorption. as provided in Policy dated 20^ April, 20 K The petitloner, aii empl State Road Transport Corp .^yce of erstwhile Madhya Pradcsh joration (M.P.S.R.T.C.), has been Grade-III vide order dated 8.61 its Department ofTransport h^ to the absorption of tfae en3| which has been placed on rec^ Chhattisgarh and Ors. [W.P.j issue relating t.o scheme oJ| decision taken by the Govt.lnj 6.8.2010 passed in the case 41 taking mto consideration fh^ absorption framed by fhe Sta|t< CM<if^i<i1i 'RP^ff ^* f^^t <f^<^i< ^ 3tR^T 3T!"^T ;1 for the petitioner. Lawyer tbr tlie State, on advance posted on deputation in dist(ict office at. Jashpur as Assistant ^2006 (Annexure P-1). The State in ^s taken policy decision with regard ployees of erstwhile M.P.S.R.T.C., ird as Annexure P-2. This Court in the casb of A.K. Dwivedi Vs. State of (S) 4245/10] dealt with the similar absorption based on the policy the Transport Depart.ment followed by various departmental sche^ne, directions etc. Vide order dated A.K. Dwivedi (supra), this Court, policy of absorption, fhe rule of Govt. in fhe matter of absorption 4 XI-HC—78 T^r ^ii^i^i^, '^rl^FTg1, T®j<ni^^< HI*RIW^P;H^l '^200 ^Vf^ 'q^RT (<lc<f^<^T) W^T^Tl^TW ~^^\ ^^W^E 1'^TW ^ftU ^TT^?T <—^ :s Praveen t of employees of erstwhile ^ number of similarly situatedj various departments of Govt. | policy, directed consideratio|i at)sorption in that case. In the present case record, a more recent circul|ar 20.4.2010, which also taJjks absorption, Moreover, the pe^ orders which show that sc|me M.P.S.R.T.C., who were w|( establishments, have been at|>! in the opinion of fhis Cour^, respondents to consider f4< absorption in accordance (Annexiii'e P-2). It is expected that ftie (fl the case of the petitioner possible. With the albresaid o| disposed of. GM^m<i1i 1RT^rf ^f Fs4il <I^'^j< >^3tRmw^r .P.S.R.T.C. aiid further that large employees have been absorbed in |in implementation of tlie absorption of the case of the petitioner for 41s0y the petitioner has placed on relating to absorption issued on of consideration of case for t.itioner has placed on record certain of the employees of erstwhile 'jorking on deputation in various ^sorbed in various bodies. Therefore, |, it would be appropriate to direct case of the petitioner also for |with its policy dated 20.4.2010 lecision with regard to absorption of ihatl be taken as expeditiously as )servations, tlie petition is fmally Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge j~