IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6958 of 1991 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- DOLUSANG BHURABHAI RATHOD Versus SAURASHTRA UNIVERSITY -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR AJ SHASTRI for Petitioner MR SP HASURKAR for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD Date of decision: 18/08/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT Heard Mr. A. J. Shastri, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner. Mr. J. R. Nanavati, learned advocate for the respondent University. In the present petition, the prayer has been made in para 12(A) by the petitioner to direct the respondent university to publish result of Second LLB Examination conducted in December, 1987 and considering the fact that the petitioner has cleared the etiquitte subject of First LLB, then direct the respondent University to give admission to the petitioner to Third LLB course. Considering the question in respect of the prayer, more than 13 years have been passed by now since the petition is of 1991. It is also submitted by Mr.Shastri that he has no instructions from his client so far. In view of this, learned advocate Mr.Shastri submitted that because of passage of time, this petition has become infructuous and therefore, the same may be disposed of with liberty to revive the same in case of difficulty. In view of statement made by Mr.Shastri, the petition is disposed of as become infructuous. However, it is clarified that in case of difficulty in future, it is open to the petitioner to revive the petition by filing note in the Registry of this Court. In view of this observation, the petition stands disposed accordingly with no order as to cost. Rule discharged. Date : 18-8-2000 [ H. K. Rathod, J. ] #kailash#