<^6 75ET '<)!<< IOAI, BITfly'IS, fs|<^|U^< ^l08 NIMvll *Mlcb WI, 200 3n^?r 'vss; (ipf^g^T) SII^I.'^T R-ii* WII 3IKW '*t)l«b l^iiw ^ifro sn^r SB : HON'lSLE SHRIJUSTI WRIT PETITION (^271 N6. 2056 OF 2008 PETITIONBR JUDGIffBNT DEBTOS VERSOS RE^PONDBNTS AWARD HOLDER JUDGEMENT DEBTOR 7.4.2008 Shri Shailendra Dube4 By thls petition undeij India, the petitioner has <ni<4[ci^*i ^i4^t*'^ Isl^l <f^i^g.i< ^aifiwsn^i :E DHIRENDRA MISHRA 1 Suiul Kumar Agrawal Son of i Shri Kamkumar Agrawal, I aged about 37 years, Resident ! of Village Morga (Bango), I Talisil Katgllora, DistricL |Korba(CG) Munna Suigh Raj Son ofLate Liiku Singh Raj, aged about 40 years, Resident of VUlage Barpali, Tahsil Kartala, Uistrict Korba (CG) Dharampal Son Rainadhar Kenwat, of Vfllage Morga TahsU Katghora, Korba (CGl of Shri Resident (Bango), District The United India Insuraiice Company Limited, through fhe Branch Manager, T.P. Nagar, Korba, TahsU and Uista-lct Korba (CG) ', coiinsel for the petitioner. Article 227 of the Constitution of iinpugned fhe order dated 31st ?iiy°()t^i ^N" ysiuii<?wi, —FS/59— 8/30m —30,COU. ^sef ^w\vi<f, ®i(1y'i<s,R«iyy ^ WRW <b*11* an^I W l<-f '(Tsff SH^T ?Fiira? 3(l1?T TRW ( 4^tl'>l<{IST) WI. 200 i^TI^K ^iftvan^r s^- January, 2008 passed in in fhe Court of II (FTC), Korba whereby directed the process against the judgraent de who has illegally attached in execution proceedings. ixecution Case No. 104/06 penduiE Motor Accident Clairas Tribzm.al (|he leamed claims Tribunal has to lodge Ftrst Information Report ))tor namely Sunil Kum.ar Agrawal, of the vehicle which was bf the award in fhe execution Additioital servdr obtained toossession Leamed counsel fol leamed clatais Tribunal heanng to the petitioner and also did not consider was never ordered to be alttached After perusal of fhe there is no illegality, committed by fhe learnefi interference in exercise of| Constitution of India. Acjc of substance deserves to itself and is herebv dismids q>t<lf^Pfl*<^l4^ ^[^S'l <F!q<^l< ^ 3TJ<W 3Tl^T ^ the petitioner submits fhat fhe |did not afford any opportunft;' of Ibefore issutne the above direction |±u.sfact that the vehicle ia question |inipugned order I ana. satisfied that tnfirmity or jurisdictional error claim.s Tribunal, which warrants Burisdiction under Article 227 of fhe fcordingly, the petition beuig devoid )e dismissed at fhe adinission stage sed. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ^