IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8814 of 2011 Ram Jee Mishra, son of Late Ram Kishun Mishra, resident of village Sisiya, P.O.-Sasamunsa, P.S. Kuchi Kote, District-Gopalganj. …… Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Chief Engineer, Building Construction Department Siwan, District-Siwan. 3. The Superintending Engineer, Building Construction Department, District-Siwan. 4. The Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department, Building Division, District-Siwan. 5. The Assistant Engineer, Building Sub-Division Siwan, District- Siwan. ……..Respondents. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr.Sanjay Kumar @ Manu, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, A. C. to S. C. VI. -------- 03/ 15.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for directing the respondents to pay the due amount of Rs.1,46,400.00 and other dues for the work done vide Agreement no. F2 of 2010- 11 for barricading in Rajendra Stadium on occasion of Vishwash Yatra dated 27.06.2010 by the Chief Minister of Bihar as well as the work order issued by the Executive Engineer (respondent no.4) vide letter no.1014 for which the work certificate had been issued by the said Executive Engineer on 05.08.2010 and for other ancillary reliefs. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the averments of learned counsel for the parties and the materials on record, this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty - 2 - to the petitioner to move before the Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department, Building Division, Siwan (respondent no.4) raising all his dispute which he has raised before this court and giving the entire due amount which the petitioner is claiming. If such an application is filed within fifteen days from today before the said authority by the petitioner along with a copy of this order, the said authority shall decide it in accordance with law by a speaking order within two months thereafter. If any amount is found admitted and payable, the same should be paid to the petitioner immediately thereafter. However, if any amount is not admitted and payable in the said order, the petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the same before an appropriate forum. Sunil (S. N. Hussain, J.)