IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.438 of 2010 ANNU KUMAR BHAGAT @ RANJAN BHAGAT @ ANNU BHAGAT SON OF LATE ARJUN BHAGAT. Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.1569 of 2010 SANJAY BHAGAT @ BUDHUA SON OF SATYA NARAIN BHAGAT. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18/01/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that there is no eye witness to the occurrence nor there is any reason for the same and the petitioners are the Mama and friend of the Mama of the deceased and no information was given by the family of the deceased F.I.R. having been instituted on the statement of the Chowkidar, let the petitioners above named, who are in custody since 13.8.2009 and 22.8.2009 and have no criminal antecedent, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, (West), Muzaffarpur, in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 113 of 2006 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as 2 to how he is related with the petitioners.(ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and if they are, they shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)