IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR COMPANY APPLICATION (CAO) NO.1056 OF 2010 IN O.L.R. NO. 8 OF 2000 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 9 OF 1991 IN THE MATTER OF M/S. NAGPUR TRANSFORMER LTD. (IN LIQUN.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. Anjan De, Advocate for Official Liquidator. Mr. S.V.Sohoni, Advocate for Respondent /Accused No.1. Mr. A.R.Atre, Advocate for Respondent/ Accused No.5. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 17, 2010. The learned counsel Mr. Atre for respondent No.5 states that he was present on last occasion and is also present in the Court today. In such circumstances, it would not be necessary to issue fresh bailable warrant against respondent No.5. The learned counsel Mr. S.V. Sohoni appears on behalf of respondent/ accused No.1. There would be, therefore, no necessity to issue bailable warrant to respondent No.1. C.A.O. No.1056 of 2010 is disposed of accordingly. Mr. De, learned counsel for the Official Liquidator states that the correct addresses of respondents No.2, 3 and 4 would be supplied within a period of two weeks. S.O. to 08.10.2010. JUDGE RR.