IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1876 of 2007 Kumud Kumar Ranjan son of Sri Anil Kumar Prasad, Resident of Village- Nagwan, P.S.- Belsar (Vaishali), District- Vaishali. VERSUS 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Director, Labour Employment and Training Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Registrar, Examination Department, I.T.I., Muzaffarpur. 4. The Principal, I.T.I., Muzaffarpur. 5. The Controller of Examination, I.T.I., Muzaffarpur. ******* Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy-I Counsel for the State : SC-21. ******* 05 14.11.2008 The petitioner had taken admission in Industrial Training Institute, Muzaffarpur in “Wire Man Trade” for the Session 1999-2001. Petitioner’s result not being published by the respondent- Controller of Examination, I.T.I., Muzaffarpur. He has come to this Court. Counter affidavit has been filed, wherein, it has been said that registration of the petitioner is irregular. What is made by registration is, in fact admission of petitioner to the course. It is said that petitioner applied under the category of backward class-2 and did pass and secure first division. But, on scrutiny, it was found that he was admitted in place of seats reserved for scheduled casts scheduled tribes. This is the only irregularity. In my view, as the petitioner had successfully pursue the course his results cannot be withheld for this mistake, which was committed by the Office of the I.T.I., Muzaffarpur. They had the time to scrutinize the application, they failed to do so. They cannot be permitted 2 to turn around after the student has spent time, money and energy and given the examination, now to say that the initial registration itself was irregular. In view of the above observations, the writ petition is allowed and I direct the respondent-Controller of Examination to publish the result forthwith. Trivedi/ ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)