IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10061/2011-G Decided on:24.11.2011 _____________________________________________ Jagdeep Singh. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ankush Sood, Addl. A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Mr. P.P. Chauhan submits that the present lis is covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP No.2059 of 2010, titled Hridye Prakash versus State of H.P. and another and other connected matters, decided on 26.7.2011. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner also as per the principles laid down in the judgment cited hereinabove. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 It is clarified that in case any Letters Patent Appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 26.7.2011 (supra) by the respondent-State; the decision taken by respondent No.1 shall abide by the outcome of the same. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 24.11.2011 *awasthi*