IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18864 of 2011 1. Manoj Kumar Pandey, S/O-Ashok Kumar Pandey 2. Shatrughan Singh Parag @ Shatrughan Singh Parihar, S/O-Bhan Singh Parihar Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 28.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Although, petitioners were caught red handed while they were engaged in checking tickets at Patna City Railway Station and some forged documents were recovered from their possession but it would appear from perusal of the first information report itself, that when petitioners were interrogated, they disclosed that one Abhishek and one other person had given appointment letters to them. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that, as a matter of fact, petitioners were cheated by the aforesaid Abhishek and he provided fake appointment letters to the petitioners after taking bribe from them. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with G.R.P., Patna P.S. Case No. 157 of 2011 subject to condition that one of the sureties must be father of the petitioners and furthermore, petitioners shall attend the trial court in person on each and every date for the period of seven months and if 2 they fail to do so without any genuine reason, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners. It is needless to say that the trial court shall conclude the trial of the petitioners within the above stated period of seven months and if the trial of the petitioners is not concluded within the above stated period, the condition of physical appearance imposed upon them by this Court would not apply. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)