IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 1-3-2007 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice P.SATHASIVAM and The Honourable Mr.Justice N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR W.A.No.2322 of 2002 1. The Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009. 2. The Commissioner of Police, City Police Office, Chennai - 600 008. ... Appellants Vs. 1. D.P.Anand (Died) 2. Mrs.Amita Sawhney ... Respondents (R-2 brought on record as LR of the deceased sole respondent vide order of the court dated 23.2.2007 made in WAMP No.47 to 49 of 2007) This writ appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order of the learned single Judge dated 21.6.2002 in W.P.No.12706 of 2002 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pending before the 2nd Respondent ending with his order bearing Rc.No. E3(1)/527/97097/2001, dated 2.4.2002 and quashing the same by directing the 2nd Respondent to grant the licence for holding the Indian Cultural dances at No. 42 Anna Salai, Chennai 2 on the basis of the Application dated 17.12.2001 for the period 1.1.2002 to 31.12.2002. For Appellants : Mr.P.Subramaniam, Government Advocate For 2nd Respondent : Mr.A.S.Chandrasekar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was made by P.SATHASIVAM, J.) The above writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 21.6.2002 made in W.P.No.12706 of 2002, in any by which the learned Judge, after quashing the impugned proceedings of the Commissioner of Police, directed the said authority to dispose of the matter afresh within a period of three weeks from the date of communication of the said order. 2. Heard the learned Government Advocate for the appellants as well as Mr.A.S.Chandrasekar, learned counsel for the second respondent. 3. It is brought to our notice that pursuant to the direction of the learned single Judge, licence was granted and the same was renewed periodically. In such circumstances, we are of the view that no further adjudication is required in this writ appeal at this juncture. However, it is made clear that if there is any violation of the conditions and statutory provisions, the appellants are free to take appropriate action in accordance with law. With the above observation, the writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. vr Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar To 1. The Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. The Commissioner of Police, City Police Office, Chennai - 600 008. + 1 cc to the Government Pleader, SR No.13002 + 1 cc to Mr. A. S. Chandrasekaran, Advocate SR No. 12519 KV(CO) SR/9.3.2007 W.A.No.2322 of 2002 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/