IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 8595/2008 Decided on:16.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Usha Kumari. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Varun Chandel, Advocate vice Mr. Rajiv Jiwan, Advocate for respondents No. 4 and 5. ____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner’s case, in a nutshell, is that she is widow and her case has not been considered for appointment to the post of Part Time Water Carrier in Government Primary School, Rakkar, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra. There is no contemporaneous material placed on record that the petitioner has ever filed application before the competent authority for considering her case for the post of Part Time 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 Water Carrier. Moreover, petitioner has not placed any tangible evidence on record to establish that she is widow. Respondent No.5 has been engaged under clause 12 of the Scheme. 2. Consequently, this Court will not interfere at this belated stage; however, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to make a representation to the competent authority for considering her against any vacant post in and around village Rakkar for the post of part Time Water Carrier. 3. In the light of above, the petition is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 16.12.2010 *awasthi*