IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 1472 of 2007 (O&M) Date of decision : March 03, 2009 Krishan Lal ....Petitioner versus Ram Niwas ....Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pritam Pal Present : Ms. Kranti Dhir, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for respondent Pritam Pal,J. (Oral) This revision has been filed against order dated 5.4.2007 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Kaithal whereby respondent Ram Niwas was acquitted in a case for commission of offence punishable under sections 363, 366, 376 IPC. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the impugned judgment, it is apparent that the prosecutrix while appearing as PW1 before the trial court herself admitted to have made her statement Ex. DA under section 164 Cr.P.C before the Magistrate. There, she had given her age as 19 years. Not only that it is also an admitted fact as discussed in para no. 15 of the impugned judgment that she had exercised her right of vote in the year 2004 as per the voter list prepared by the Government official in the discharge of his duty. It is further evident from para no. 16 of the impugned judgment that she had voluntarily gone Criminal Revision No. 1472 of 2007 (O&M) -2- with the accused. The aforesaid findings arrived at by the trial court are based upon cogent and convincing material placed before it. Thus, this Court finds that the above findings are not perverse or unreasonable in any manner. The present revision petition is dismissed. ( Pritam Pal ) March 03, 2009 Judge 'dalbir'