(L^' ^ii^^^^' 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTSGARH) WRIT^ETITION fS) N0. 3^ of 2010 PETITIONER z^ /J>/./ ^/y/ ^Y^ / \^-W\o/ ^yAC^OV ^%^tr ^ <?^'f'/y ^y ^' RESPONDENTS :/ Chitrakant Sahu aged 2 1 years S/o Shri Arun Kuraar Sahu Presently posted as Shikshakarmi Grade III at Govt. Primary School Chichapol, Block-Kasdol District Raipur (C.G.) R/o Sirpur road Kasdol, District-Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS ^: 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department Panchayat and Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Collector, Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.). 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat-Mainpur District -Raipur 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat-Raipur District -Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA to •^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR PETITIONER WRIT PETmON (8) No. 36 of2010 Ctritrakant Sahu. VERSUS RESPONDENT8 State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARIICLE 226 OF THE CON8TITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri, J. Present: Shri Jitendra NMh Nande, Advoeate for the petitioner. Shri M,P.S.Bhatia, D^uty Govenmient Advocate forfhe State. Shri Arun S^ Advocate fbr the respondent No. 3. ORALORDER (Passed on 29m day of January, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing tor the respondwt N©.3, wifhout filing retum^ on instructiotis, submite that the impugaed temunation order dated 10.12.2009 (Annexiu-e P/l) has been recalled by order dated 22.12.2009 and as such, nothmg survives for adjudication. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner does not controvert tfie above submission. 3. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge Amit