IN THE M.P.ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BENCH, RAIPUR M.P. ’7 WW’B HVM’ O.A.NO. APPLICANT Dr.Smt.Ve’na Tripathi W/o Dr.R.P;Tripathi, aged about 37 years, Asst.Professor (Chemistry), Pt.Jawaharla1 Nehru,Govt.Arts & Science College, Bemetara, Distt.Durg, R/o Bemetara, Tah. Bemetara, Distt.Durg. VERSUS RESPONDENTS (l) Govt.of Madhya Pradesh through Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, BHOPAL. (2) Commissioner, Higher Education, Vallabh Bhawan, BHOPAL, Incharge Principal, Pt.Jawaharlal Nehru, Govt.Arts & Science College, Bemetara, Distta Durg. APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT 1985. 3a W, Wm, Mi WK w?(§)m'3 man-m mmaxw mmfiwm $Wm 3555 : §=§£m’%ie $§Iri a§anm€ka ax’mhaw $ hrivasta‘ga‘ J. 23.€}3.29’w: Shri AKN. Pandey, counsei fcri Shri Arvind Dubey, Pane! Lawyx WEth the consent of ieamed C" FinaHy. By this petition, petitioner has 5 respect 0f the Learned ceunsei for the. petitk paid. He however submits ihat there respondents may be directed to pay int: in repiy, [earned Steie counsel i complete the necessary formaiities, as of saiary. Frem ihe pleadings and docum: has duly submitted herjei'ning after rett i)‘ “O This is iii the opinien ‘of thiE Court is a disputed fact. Under these eiroumstances, itwould be properto diaeotthe concerned authorities to hoid a fact ending enquiry with regard tothe fact ofjoining of the petitioner. Accordingly, reeoondent No.3 i5 directed to enquire into the matter. if it is herjoining on 31—0’f—1999 (Annexure A—6) led to interest as per rulee from the date . With the aforesaid direction, the pericd from August, 199E) een Stated by the respondente that roperly‘. 1e petitlener. 3r for the State/respondente No.1 & 3. >un$el for the partiesx the petitien is heard irayed for direction for payment of salary in to December, 1999. ner submits that later on salary has been was delay in payment of salary, hence, erest for such delay. ,u‘omits that a3 the petitioner himself did not a result, there Wae some delay in payment ants on record] it is found that‘the petitioner irning from refresher course. ln reply, it has the‘petitioner did not submit her joining found that the petitiener had submitted aetoiaimed by her, she would be enti, aatary for ditterent months became due tition stands disposed of. Sd/— Manmdra Mohan Shrivastava Judge Turm’e e