IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No.15547 of 2010 Date of Decision:28.9.2011 Khushal Singh and another .... Petitioners Versus Chief Administrator, HUDA and others ... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Namit Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sheenu Sura, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 5. Mr. Rajesh Malik, Advocate for respondent No.6. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the order dated 2.2.2010 (Annexure P-6) passed by respondent No.4 whereby respondent No.6 has been promoted to the post of driver ignoring the claim of the petitioners, who are senior than respondent No.6 in their circle. Reply has been filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 5. It is submitted in the reply that respondent No.6 is Ram Niwas posted as driver in the office of the Executive Engineer, HUDA Division No.1, Gurgaon whereas impugned order (P-6) pertains to one Ram Niwas posted at HUDA Division No.1, Rohtak at Rohtak. Moreover, the seniority of Group “C” and “D” are maintained on the Circle and Division basis respectively. The petitioner is employee of Gurgaon Division, however, the impugned order (P-6) is of Ram Niwas C.W.P No.15547 of 2010 -2- working in Rohtak Division. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed with liberty to file afresh on correct facts and impugned order, if any, relating to the Gurgaon Circle. 28.9.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE