CWP-10404/10 (1) In The High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench, Jaipur O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10404/2010 Mrs. Maya Hariyana Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Date Of Order :: 02/08/2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, for petitioner. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner who is presently working on the post of Teacher Grade-III, was placed under suspension on account of alleged disobedience of the order passed by the authority in exercise of powers u/R.13(1) of the Rules,1958 vide order dt.22.7.2010. Counsel submits that petitioner while working as a Teacher in Government Girls Upper Primary School, Gangauri Bazar, Jaipur was deputed to census duties for a period of one and half month in summer break in June, 2010 but because of her problems and medical advise as she is suffering from arthritis and was not possible for her to undertake and accordingly she sent a representation to the authorities and the petitioner's husband deposited the material but after availing medical leave when she reported for duty as per medical advise she was not permitted to join and at the same time she was placed under suspension vide order dt.22.7.2010. Counsel submits that it was not under the competence of the respondents to call CWP-10404/10 (2) upon the petitioner to discharge duties for census work for which she has been appointed. The petitioner has been placed under suspension by the District Education Officer (Elementary Education), which is indeed appealable order u/R.22 of the Rules,1958 and objections which has been raised by her taken note of by this Court, petitioner is always at liberty to raise before the appellate authority. In view of effective remedy of appeal available to the petitioner u/R.22 of the Rules, 1958, this Court is not inclined to exercise its equitable jurisdiction u/Art.226 of the Constitution. Consequently, the petition stands dismissed. However, if appeal is preferred by the petitioner, it is expected from the authority to decide the same after passing a speaking order within three months in accordance with law from the date of submission of appeal. (Ajay Rastogi),J. VS Shekhawat/-p.2 10404cw10Aug02FnlDsms.doc