IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Rev.(T) No.: 59 of 2008. Decided on: 29.10.2010. __________________________________________________________ Dharam Parkash. … Petitioner. Versus H.P.S.E.B. and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Vipin Potyaan, Advocate vice Mr. Subhash Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Ms. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. Vipin Potyaan, Advocate appearing vice Mr. Subhash Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 29, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?