IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38008 of 2009 PINKI SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----- 2/ 03.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that due to enmity in between two villagers, petitioner has been named as one who was in associations with real assailant, Shailendra Singh and Ram Singh and is apprehending his arrest, which is not justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Neemchak Bathani P.S. Case No. 09 of 2003, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)