Crl.M.No.M-30329 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-30329 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:October 13, 2010 Charanjit Kaur .....Petitioner v. The State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Gorakh Nath, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.54303 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-30329 of 2010 The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.106, dated 14.7.2010, under Section 304-B IPC, registered at Police Station City Dhuri, District Sangrur, Punjab. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully, including the impugned order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur, vide which application filed on behalf of the present petitioner for anticipatory bail was dismissed. Brief allegations against the petitioner-accused are that she is mother-in-law of the deceased. Son of petitioner got married with deceased in the month of November 2008. There are specific allegations against the petitioner-accused and co-accused that they had been harassing and taunting the deceased on account of dowry. Daughter of the complainant died just within two years of the marriage and death was unnatural one. It is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory Crl.M.No.M-30329 of 2010 (O&M) -2- bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused. Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Charanjit Kaur for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 13.10.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge