1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.4690 of 2010. Anil Tulshiram Sonkusle Nagpur ..vs.. The State of Mah. through its Secretary Mantralaya Mumbai and ors. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.S.R.Narnaware Adv. for the petitioner. Mrs.B.Dangre, AGP for the State. C ORAM : V. C. DAGA AND A.B.CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATED : 19th November, 2010. Heard. The learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the decision in the case of Tarachand s/o Fakirachand Ninave ..vs.. Joint Commissioner and Vice Chairman, Scheduled Tribe Caste Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur and ors. reported in 2010(5) Mh.L.J.326. By consent of the parties, impugned order is set aside and proceedings are remitted back for reconsideration to the Caste Scrutiny Committee. The Committee is expected to decide the caste claim of the petitioner within period of eight weeks on the basis of the existing material which is already in their possession. 2 Till the caste claim of the petitioner is decided, parties to maintain status quo. If the order is adverse to the petitioner, the status quo should be maintained for another two weeks from the date of communication of the order. The petition stands disposed of in above terms. No order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE. pzc