G^ '109 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. ^ M j ^ /2011 PETITIONER \ ,1?\^ iv~ ^-^ ...••• ^ ''....--•" ^•yc^^ ..<< Y '?^/<x >••" ^' RESPONDENTS '^r^ Narvet Toppo, aged about 53 years, S/o Francis Toppo, Head Master, Middle School Dhap, Block Laitunga, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through fhe Secretary, Department of School Education, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur. 2. CoUector, Raig^rh (C.G.) District Education OfBcer, Distict Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER AimCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDtA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT. il&-^ .^.i^ :^^ HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.4414 OF 2011 PETITIONER Narvet Toppo Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Ravindra Agrawal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adv. General for the State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on this 12th day ofAugust, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge the legality and validity of the order dated 15-7-2011 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Government Middle School, Dhap, Block Lailunga to the office of Block Education Officer, Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh. 3. At the very outset, leaned counse.' appsaring for the State submits that by memo dated 9-8-2011 issued by the Department of School Education, all the transfer orders of Head Masters, which have been declared as class II posts, have been cancelled. Thus, nothing remains for adjudication. 4. In view of foregoing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for adjudication in this matter. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Gowri Satish K. Agnifaotri Judge