c^^ M :W.;3F>.^S1.'No.:l<fsi;32-'y 2006 • agEITIONER ^ "..?'"S:'^.:..^...£ ....../-: ;:'S^::?':':''l?v;'lS\'®N^^ -i^ 's^^^ ^^" ' ^•y^^''.''' ''.' tiS " : '-^mt. Kailasha^Bai ^e^ghri^M Age abeut 42 Year^glSlfii&lamput,''? . •P.Q.Sakri, TaK. TaWaSsi&-,v: 'v; .'...:.', ^: ';.;Distt.Bilas|3ur.(C.G;)®s',.:.;^.'':11-:. VERSUS €• RESPONDENTS •^.-^...-.-State.^'CI'itiatt^gapffi^^''' ffir&t^Ji:%^ei^a^'':':;':: :'^ sa;|^igi|;]^at|FHi|n$|Bfii&B|j®is^ Ui^iiSSSSS'ISSSSff^SWiiSiKsrtr ^':^i'p^fcG.^y':;>:'''''/'%^::: .d? ^..^' ^v,<(>' ^•^^^••^f^ ^ yy 2. .•Engineer-in-Chiefr .?%. Rublic Works Eieplt'iSlllgBt^ ,;:;,;(::;..Ra4pur'(C.G;)':'::,...';,:Sig^ Superi nterKsl'Eng^Bnginieer; Public W6r'Ks:,.I3®BaM:ment;; .Bilaspur ©i^ismni,;:';.':^^w DiStt.'Bilaspyr^©s®^P^ ^l.r-ExeeutiveSriginee^'.y , • :F'UblieWQrks;Depai-ttinent, ,- Oivis ipn N p.1 Bilaspu r, Distt. Bilaspyr (C.G.) .^WRI^.tE1a^©ilfflt«^^EalSBBI @,ii§g2I®g,fgii^(^^ •:',^®'^;::£"s%^(iM<ifMS»08aMiMfiKaii^ -^-.''. HIGH COURT OP JUDICjBLTUWB CHHATTI86ARH: BI1A8POR SIng^le Beach: Hon'ble Slu'iSatish K. AguUiotri, J. W. P. (81 H0.493& of 2006 Petitioner : Sint. Kaflaslia Bai Versus Respondent : Statc of Chhattisgarh aTid others w 1 €• S1iri S. P. Kalc, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Du'bey, Govt. Advocate <br the rRspondents. {Sfh Septesatber, 3006$ 1. I^eamed connsel for tlic petitioner silbmits that the petitioner was appointed on 1.11.1988 as daity-wsger aTid her Rogageinent is cotitiniung. 2. The petjtjons'r has filed this petition praying for arclief m terms of ttie judgmeiat and orier passcd by the Supreine Court: m the case of 8e<a'etarylState a>f KarnatakR fe oth<ws Vs. tTmadewl (3) and others1 aud Mtoeral Exploratlon Corporatloa Banployees' Onlon v. Mineral Bxploratloa Corporatton Umited 8k Anr. 3. The Supreine Coitrt in ttle csse ofSecretary, Sfart;®ofKwnataka & others (supra), in para.53 has held as under:- *53. ............. The c/uestian of rKgida.rissation of the services of siwh emplayi'es may ha.ve tf> he conswtered fin Tnerifs in ihe lighl ofifse prirusplf's setfted. hy this Court tn fhe cases ahove referred. to and.in fhKlight of fhif jfMiynfnt. Inihat (fmtext, ihe tJnion of fndia, tlie State Gmicmnfffnis and fhfir instn^jnentalities shoiAld. tak.e sieps to regiilame as a. finp-iww. measitre, ihf senrices nf suf^i. irrf'gijlfirly appointefi, whfi ha.ve worked. for ten years or mare in diily saneftonod' posfe hiii not under cover of orders of ihe ccsiurls or af tribunals and shfndd ftjtrthsr ensure ihat regijilcv recyiMtmrnls arf urul/erftikentofillfhosevfvanisan-cfionf'd.posts that reqizire to be fiSedup, in fases ishere tenipoTary employees or daily wagers are heing nm»employed. The prMfss naist be set in mf)ti<m. vrithin six nijonihs firmi ffus date. We also dajify Thakur 3 tha.t regiMarisxition, if any alrea.dyma.de, hri nf>1 si.th p.uScs, need not he reopened beised im. ihis judgmenl, •bld there shmzld be RO fu.rther bypassiffg 6f fhe cmistitittimia.l reqwremeni and regulaising w maJc.ing perm.a.ru'n.t, those not dijihf appointed as per ihe aortsiihltional sctenfe. 4. The Supreine Coiirt iu the case ofMIneraI Exploratlon Cwporatlon Employees' Union (Supra) ID paral7 has held as under;- 17. Ji is seenfrom fhe ahove poragraph thal ihis Court direcied fhe TJhion of fttdto, fhf. SiatK Gmieminip.nls and their ins(rum«rrfoA<MS <o rf'gtilariye aa a (mie-timtf measure, thf services fff srwh irregiilcirly appoinied uwrkmen, who hare worked. for fen yea.rs or rnore in dldy sartftioned posis but not under cotwr of oniers of fhe c»Kirls or of fribijvials and shiauld further ensvre thfit regidftr recnMtments are underlaking to fill fhose vacant sctnidioned poste tha.t require to he fttted up, in cases where lemporary RinpJoyees or ilaily vfagers are bemg runa ejnployed 5. Having heard leamcdl counse) <br the partics, having regaid to fhe facts and ciicnnistances of the case and without expressjng finy opinion on merits ofthecase, the request made by teamed counsel for the petitioner isjiisf, feir and reasonable. Tlierefore, the petitioner is allowcd to roak'e a detaited nRpresentation, raising all bis gnevances anncxing a copy offhe writ petition and its annexiires to the concemed aiithorily within a period oftendays frova today and the. concepned aiithorily is dircctefl to decide ttie representation wittiin--one month (Tomi ttic rtate of its receipt afl'er considcring the points caised by the petitioner, in an ohjective manner, on its own incrits, in accordancewith law. 6. Wjth the'directions aforesaid, the pctition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. f SatishK. Agnihotri Judge {(2006) 4 SCC I}' {JT 2006 (7) SC 151)2