•»'£*- '^'^.. "'s 8 /^ h2^3,.., 1%?"" y 'stitionsr iH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: WritPetitlonNo.1309 of Harish Meshram, S/o. D.S. Meshram, aged about 35 yea.rs, R/o. Rajendra Nagar, Raipyr(Ghhaaisgarh). Resoondents 2. «s versus State of Chhattisgarh throuah the Sscreta.ry, Dspartment of Corr.mercis ^isv i/^v^is;£a\ i^'srii'Fc'l-stva F^ k' % l"^hs-iA/-si-^ i Sfl^ \s-.Jf\:wi-SW^ E'si^its i«aaiSi^Ci i A«t",a'\ •'i.r'. ^iii l.Ct?y5ia i. RsiDur {Chhsttlsosrh'). ^'*^T 1 t E s^fl M.r-hf^^<iril ^ f^ Uommissioner Raipur (CG). Exci.se, Chhamsoarh, Coltector (Excise) ttisgarh). s'iasDur Assistant Commissioner-Excise, BiiasDur (Chhattisgarh). Awadesh Ral, S/o. Nai'aysri Rai, R'o. Kududand, Biiaspur (CG). i'3^^y'^Q^^i'^s^s^ Writ Petition unsierArticle 226 of Constltufion of Indias i-resent: I'l^l. tssn K. Agnsi Shri Ashish Shrivasl^va, couris©!for the pstltion^r. Shri Aiok Sakshi, Govt. Advocate forthe responctents No. 11( 4/State. Shri Abhishek Sinha. counsel t'or the Caveates'. Ms. A.S. Sisodjya, counse! forthe rsspondent No.5. (Passed on thls 29 day of -September, 2008) Lsamed counsst appearing for the petifioner submits that this petition has becoms infructuous and as such nothsng remasns for adjudication in the "natter, to which tearned counsei appearing for the respondents 'nave no obisction. 2) !f is ordered as oraved for. 3) Accordlng5y,.the petition is dlsmissed as havina beoome infryctuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge