( 1 ) cria5329.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5329 OF 2010 Sow. Sumanbai w/o. Dasu Mete .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. S.T. Ghute, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. N.H. Borade, A.P.P. for respondent/State. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE,J. [VACATION COURT] DATED : 31.12.2010 P.C. :- 1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. Upon hearing the Counsel for the applicant, this Court is not inclined to entertain the application for anticipatory bail. Hence, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected. However, the applicant is protected for two weeks to enable the applicant to take appropriate steps to apply for regular bail before the competent Court. ( 2 ) cria5329.10 2. In the light of above, the police authorities are directed not to take coercive action against the applicant for two weeks to enable the applicant to apply for regular bail. 3. The application stands rejected. [S.S. SHINDE,J.] snk/2010/DEC10/cria5329.10