€^.. 68 COURT OF CHHATTIS^ARH AT BIS^SPUR Single Bench : Hon'bte Shri Justice S.R.Naycsk, Chief Justice 1;11 PETITIONER Wnt PstltJon No. 1913/2005 Deyi Prasad Tiwari/ S/o Shri Durga Prasad, Aged about 57 years/ R/o Chikhli/ bistt. ftaigarh (€.©,),besignation Forest ©uard* Versus RESPONDENT5 1. State of Chhatt-isgarh, Through: Secretary, &epartment of Fore^t, Mantraby, b.K-S.Bhawan, P.0. <& bistt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Conseryator of Forest/ Bilaspur Circle, P.0. & bistt.- Bilaspur (C.6.) 3. Divisiona! Forest Officers/, Raigarh, Forest Division, P.0. Raigcirh, (C.B) 4. Forest ftanqer (Parikshtra ^dhjkar?) Raigarh Forest Division, P<0. and Distt," Raigarh; Shri B.R.:^iosh, for.the petitioner, Shri Sanjay Shyam Agrawa(, G.A.-fQr 1+ie State, ORALORDER (Passed on 24.2.2006) ThEs writ petition is Slable to be djsmissed in limine for the simpEe reason that the very order iinpugned in this writ petition was questhned by the petjtioner before the 2 respondent appeliate aythority and I am toia' that the 2nd respondent appelJant authority by jts order dat&d 10th <4ugust 2005 di'smissed the appea} of the petitioner^ In that view of the matter, 1+iis writ petition is dlsmissed as not maintalnable. However, ttiis order shal! not come in the way csf the petitloner calling in question the correctness of tiie order of the -^- r ~a 69 2" r&spondent dated 10.8.2005 in an independent iegaS action, if he is so No costs, i Chief Justice .^ ^•"'^