1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 263 OF 2008 Shaikh Ayub Sk. Kadu ....Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others ....Respondents. Shri. D.K. Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri. K.S. Patil, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 2nd December, 2009 PER COURT : 1. Shri. Kulkarni, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the representation of the petitioner has been decided, he should be permitted to withdraw the instant petition, with liberty to avail all such appropriate remedies as are available to him in law, to challenge the correctness of the decision taken by the respondent. 2. In view of above, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the contempt petition. The same is, therefore, dismissed as such with aforesaid observations. [ R.K. DESHPANDE, J. ] ssc/cp263.08