THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY W.P.No.5 of 1995 Dt. 24-02-2006 Between: 1.Mohd. Shareef and others. ..Petitioners. and 1. M.Ramulu (died per L.Rs.) and others. ..Respondents. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY W.P.No.5 of 1995 Oral Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and none appears for the respondents. When the writ petition is taken up for hearing learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that this Court while admitting the writ petition granted status quo and suffice if a direction is issued that the respondents shall not remove the unauthorized construction, if any, without following the procedure contemplated under law. The writ petition is came to be filed questioning the memo intimating that the applications submitted by the petitioners seeking permission for the proposed construction of additions and alterations are refused for want of reference of sanctioned layout plan or sub-division u/s. Section 388 of Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955; the site in question is affected in proposed 60’ wide road widening; no objection certificate from Collector, Hyderabad District is not enclosed and directed to remove the unauthorized constructions immediately. In view of status quo granted by this Court, if there is any unauthorized construction on the petitioners’ land, respondent authorities are bound to follow the procedure contemplated under law for removing the same as held by this Court in W.P.No.21198 of 1997 dated 03-02-1998. The writ petition is accordignly disposed of. No costs. _________________ A.GOPAL REDDY,J 24-02-2006 Murthy