bsb IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 654 of 2006 PETITION NO. 654 of 2006 PETITION NO. 654 of 2006 Prakash P. Vaishampayan ... Petitioner V/s The Union of india & ors. ... Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 4th JULY, 2007. 4th JULY, 2007. 4th JULY, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. Nobody appears for the petitioner. The petition challenges the order passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, levying damages under Section 14B of the Employees’ Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. A writ petition cannot lie against such an order when an appeal is provided under Section 7I of the Act. Apart from this, the learned counsel for the respondents states that the Provident Fund Authorities have already recovered the entire amount from the petitioner. 2. Hence, the writ petition is rejected. 2 .....