1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. SECOND APPEAL NO.16/2003 Chandrahas Jethalal Patel. ..Appellant -VERSUS- Smt.Nirmalaben S. Patel. ..Respondent ......... Mr.S.G.Deshmukh, Advocate for the appellant. The respondent No.1 is present in person. .......... CORAM : A.P.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 19th MARCH, 2009. P.C. : 1. By an order dated 04.02.2009 this Court directed the appellant to pay cost to the respondent in the sum of Rs.1000/-. The learned counsel for the appellant points out that the cost was immediately paid on 05.02.2009. The said fact is admitted by the respondent who is appearing in person. 2. The present appellant is the original plaintiff who instituted a suit against the respondent/defendant claiming right of easement in the nature of approach road from the property of the respondent. Both the Courts below on appreciation of the evidence on record have held that the plaintiff has utterly failed to prove any right much less the right of easement for the alleged approach road. 3. The finding recorded by both the Courts below is based on 2 the evidence and material on record which does not call for any interference whatsoever. No substantial question of law emerges for consideration, hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed summarily. JUDGE