IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2009 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(Crl.).No. 73 of 2009(S) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- XAVIER ALEX @ AJISH, S/O.P.T.ALEX, PUTHENVEETIL HOUE VALLARPADOM, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.DENIZEN KOMATH SRI.SHERRY J. THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MULAVUKADU POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM. 3. VINCENT PADUA, KADAVATHPARAMBIL HOUSE VALLARPADOM, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. S.U. NAZAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(Crl.) 73/2009. APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT. P1 : TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF CERTIFICATE OF MARRIAGE OF THE PETITIONER AND THE DETENUE. EXT. P2 : TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE COMPLAINT PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. A.K. BASHEER & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P. (Crl.) No. 73 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of March, 2009. JUDGMENT BASHEER, J, Mrs. Mishel Padua, the wife of the petitioner, is present in court along with her parents. Petitioner is also present. 2. As directed by us the parties had appeared before the Principal Counsellor attached to the Family Court, Ernakulam. We have perused the report submitted by the Counsellor. 3. It is evident from the report of the Counsellor that the present discord is minor and trivial. But still, according to the Counsellor, the attitude of the mother-in-law of the petitioner may be creating some hurdle in the process of re-union of the couple. From our talk with the lady, we are also left with the same impression. The report of the Principal Counsellor is taken on record. 4. We have interacted with Mrs. Mishel, who stated before us that she would like to go with her parents today and will join her husband later after she talks to her parents and gets their views in the matter. Obviously, and also as asserted by Mrs. Mishel, neither she nor her younger child are under illegal detention of her parents. Therefore, WP(Crl). 73/2009. 2 no relief as prayed for can be granted to the petitioner. The writ petition is closed. Order dated February 20, 2009 shall form part of this judgment. A.K. BASHEER, JUDGE P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sb.