1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 855 of 2010 [Rajesh Indrapal Kushwaha Vs. State of Mah.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. V.S. Raut, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. Jichkar, APP for respondent. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 25th May, 2010. 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail. 2. According to applicant, on 25th April, 2010, a mob of about 400 to 500 people had gathered because the shed over the Buddha statue was broken by some anti-social elements. The mob went to Police Station to complain, however, on the telephonic report lodged by the complainant, First Information Report was registered against various accused persons, and on the last moment, the applicant's name was included in the array of the accused persons. 3. The applicant claims that he is not involved in the commission of offence and, therefore, he is entitled for anticipatory bail. 4. According to applicant, except him, all other accused named in the alleged offence have 2 been arrested and release on regular bail. 5. The applicant claims that he is the only earning member in the family and being not involved in the case, is entitled for anticipatory bail. 6. Heard. 7. It is seen that there is adequate material on record to describe the involvement of the applicant as accused. 8. The say of the applicant that he is not involved in the alleged crime is in the nature of describing the defence, in the background that all other accused were arrested and released on bail, and further in the background that at this stage, it cannot be held that the applicant is not involved in the offence, the applicant is not entitled for the relief of anticipatory bail. 9. It shall suffice to observe that if the applicant surrenders before the Sessions Court, his application for regular bail would be considered expeditiously. 10. Application is disposed of. Judge |Hedau| 3