1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1 OF 2010. (Pragati Londhe Vs. Suhas Londhe) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 12th January, 2010. ... 1) Heard Mr.RV Gore learned Counsel extensively. 2) The applicant/wife feels aggrieved by filing a petition by the respondent/husband at Nasik. She has urged to transfer the same at Aurangabad at her parental house. In order to substantiate contention, Mr. Gore submits that there is danger to the life of applicant/wife as demonstrated in her application dated 13.8.2009 (Exhibit-C, page 21 of MCA). It is a matter of record, already at the instance of applicant/wife on 1.8.2009, a report for an offence under Sections 498A, 420, 323, 504, 506 is lodged at Nasik against the respondent/husband and the husband was even in fetters on 10.8.2009 and thereafter released on bail. 3) The apprehension nursed by the applicant/wife, that she feels danger to 2 her life, if she attends the proceedings at Nasik, is apparently a manufactured attempt. It has no basis to to accede and act upon. The other submission that the wife has now filed the proceedings at Aurangabad may be true, however, that will have independent recourse. I do not see any reason to transfer the proceedings initiated by the respondent/husband at Nasik to Aurangabad. 4) Misc. Civil Application dismissed and disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/mca1.10