CWP 11643/2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH SB Civil Writ Petition No.11643/2010 Umesh Chand Sharma and ors. Vs. The State of Raj. & ors. DATE OF ORDER : 25/08/2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Ashish Kumar Sharma, for petitioners. This is a joint petition filed by five petitioners with the grievance that despite working on the post of Helper, they have been granted the status of semi-permanent on the post of Beldar vide order Anx.1, 2 & 3 vide orders dt. 16/11/1995, 20/06/1998 and 11/08/1995 respectively. Counsel submits that the petitioners were discharging duties on the post of Helper but despite they have been declared semi-permanent on the post of Beldar which was in clear violation of Rule 3(3) of the Work Charge Service Rules, 1964. At the same time, counsel further submits that despite the petitioners have completed more than 10 years of service under the work charge cadre, no order has been passed by the respondent for giving them permanent status as provided under Rule 3(2) of the Rules, 1964. So far as the submission made that the petitioners are working as Helper and declared semi-permanent on the post of Beldar is CWP 11643/2010 [2] concerned, the same cannot be examined by this Court for the reasons that the orders were passed by the authority way back in 1995/1998 and after more one and half decade, the grievance in this regard cannot be looked into by this Court and apart form it, there is no material placed on record which could substantiate that either of the petitioner had worked on the post of Helper which could have been taken note of by the respondents while granting them semi-permanent status. However, this Court finds substance in the submission made that if the petitioners have completed more than 10 years of service, as to why the benefit of permanent status has not been granted to them to which they were entitled under the Rules, 1964. Without going into merits of the case, this Court considers it appropriate to direct the petitioners to make representation before the authority competent and if any such representation is made, it is expected from the authority to examine & consider the records relating to the services rendered by the petitioners and pass speaking order for the purpose of grant of permanent status on completion of 10 years of satisfactory service within a period of three months thereafter. If either of the petitioner is aggrieved by the decision being communicated, will be at liberty CWP 11643/2010 [3] to avail remedy available under law. With these directions/observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. Raghu-11643-CW-2010-final.doc