THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2073 OF 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is preferred by the plaintiff, aggrieved by the order and Judgment rendered by the learned Senior Civil Judge at Sathupalli, Khammam District, in C.M.A.No.1 of 2010, which in turn arose out of an Interlocutory order and decree passed by the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge at Sathupalli in I.A.No.328 of 2009 moved in O.S.No.128 of 2009. 2. The suit was instituted seeking a declaratory relief of exclusive right over a common passage. He sought for ad interim injunction that was denied by the Trail Court and the said order was confirmed by the learned Senior Civil Judge in C.M.A.No.1 of 2010. Both the Courts have rightly assessed the balance of convenience and held that, it does not lie in favour of the plaintiff for ad interim injunction. While, granting an injunction, a Court is required to assess the balance of convenience lying not only in favour of the plaintiff, but, it must also be assessed that, it shall not result in total denial of justice to other party. Hence, both Courts have rightly exercised the discretion and dismissed the Interlocutory Application as well as C.M.A. 3. I do not find any justifiable reason to interfere with the order passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed at the admission stage. 4. However, in view of the very nature of the dispute between the parties, it would be appropriate, if the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge at Sathupalli, expedites the hearing of O.S.No.128 of 2009 by preferably disposing it of on merits within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order. 5. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. _______________________________________ JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO sp 17.11.2011 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2073 OF 2011 17th November, 2011 sp