Sngle Bench IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C_ontempt Cas^Jo. -2-37 / 2011 (In the writ petition no.1745/20.11). Applicant Petitioner Non applicant K.C.Chouhan S/o Shri K.R.Chouhan aged about 53 years,R/o Presently Posted and Working as Head Master Middle School, Ranpur Block- Jashpur, Distt- Jashpur (C.G). VERSUS ;,Respondent iContemnor //' M.S.Paraste (Age and father's name not known to the petitioner) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Pt. Ravi Shankar Shukla, Premises Raipur, Raipur (C.G) ^^ APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 215 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITILSECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT. ^ L^L 1 XI-HC—78 ^2^, ^=r "^i^ici^, 's^fterys, fsioi'"^ ^,. *41*iMI SlHrai C^-dh Qu^^o- 9S?-/1) •h""""^2bo 3IT*?I qiT fS;'N; W Stt^V Sh^v Deepti TOITWdfN 3:!'^I SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mohan 14.12-2011 Shri Arvind Dubey, counsel fo^ q) [cn<<1i irm^' ^f 'f^sl' <f^$s-< ^r3ffTO3t!^?f Shri Akhiiesh Kumar, counsei for the respondent. At the outset, iearned counsel Shnvasteva.ij. the petitioner. for the respondent submitted that the order of the Court has been compfied with. ^ review DPC was held and vide order dated 5/09/2011, the petitioner has been promoted also. Refemng to the averments ! made in the reply, it has been submated that there was no inteniion on the part of ihe respondent to flout the order undertaken involved process of holdi|ng review DPC and thersfore, some time was consumed in hoiding review DPC an{! taking decision in the matter and passing an order in favour ofthe petitioner. Taking into consideration the repty submitted and also taking into consideration that the respondent w^s required to hold review DPC to compiy with the order of the Court and finally of the Court. The exercise required to be ^n order has been passed in favour of the petitioner, 1 am not inciined to proc|eed further in the matter. Ruie is therefore discharged. The petition is finaily disSaosed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge .^