-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.554 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.554 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.554 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.468 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.468 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.468 OF 2006 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.Amin Solkar for the Applicant Mr.S.V.More A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : DECEMBER 6,2006. : DECEMBER 6,2006. : DECEMBER 6,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Applicant. The conviction of the Applicant is for offences punishable under section 489-B and 489-C read with section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. The finding of the learned trial Judge is that the fake currency notes worth more than Rs.16,00,000/- were found in possession of the Applicant. The substantive sentence for offence under section 489-B is R.I. for ten years. 2. Shri Solkar appearing for the Applicant submitted that there is absolutely no evidence to show that the -2- Applicant had any knowledge that the currency notes allegedly found in his possession were fake currency notes. He submitted that at highest a case for offence punishable under section 489-C is made out which is a bailable offence. 3. After having heard the submissions of the Advocate for the Applicant and after having gone through the notes of evidence, I find that no case is made out for enlarging the Applicant on bail. Application is rejected. Hearing of the Appeal is expedited. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE