FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2836 OF 2009 [Mr. Binayak Paul Choudhury & anr. V/S. State of Maharashtra & anr.] _____________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court s orders : ’ or directions and Registrar s’ : Court s or Judge s orders ’ ’ orders : _____________________________________________________________________________________ Mr. Devasis Mitra i/by. Legal Assistance, adv.for applicants. Mrs. R.V. Newton, APP for State-respondent no.1. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 7th JANUARY, 2010. PC :- 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for parties. Perused the order issuing process and the revisional order dismissing the revision application. 2. The courts below were in no error in holding that the offence, prima-facie, is disclosed as the cheque was presented, it was dishonoured, notice was issued and even thereafter within the stipulated period, payment under the cheque was not made. All subsequent acts including making of payment would not vitiate the order issuing process in the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case. The concurrent orders do not call for any intereference. The application is dismissed. (JUDGE)