IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2007 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1929 CRP.No. 2834 of 2001() ---------------------- E.A.321/01 IN E.P.16/01 IN OS.330/1995 of ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT, KOLLAM .................... PETITIONER/JUDGMENT DEBTOR/DEFENDANT:: ---------------------------------------------------- S.HYDROSKUNJU, S/O ABDUL REHIMAN, (MSM SCHOOL MANAGER, CHATHINAMKULAM), PAMPALIL VEEDU, CHATHINAMKULAM CHERRY, KARIKKODE, KILIKOLLUR VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN SRI.P.M.JOSEPH RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS/DECREE HOLDERS: --------------------------------------------------- 1. SHAHUL HAMEED, S/O MUHAMMED KUNJU, VATHOPPALLIL VEEDU, CHATHINAMKULAM CHERRY, KILIKOLLOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 2. JAMEELA BEEVI, VATHOPPALLIL VEEDU, CHATHINAMKULAM CHERRY, KILIKOLLOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 3. ABDUL KALAM, VATHOPPALLIL VEEDU, CHATHINAMKULAM CHERRY, KILIKOLLOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 4. ABDUL AZIZ, VATHOPPALLIL VEEDU, CHATHINAMKULAM CHERRY, KILIKOLLOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 5. RASHEEDA BEEVI, VATHOPPALLIL VEEDU, CHATHINAMKULAM CHERRY, KILIKOLLOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 6. SHIHABUDEEN, VATHOPPALLIL VEEDU, CHATHINAMKULAM CHERRY, KILIKOLLOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 7. NASEEMA BEEVI, VATHOPPALLIL VEEDU, CHATHINAMKULAM CHERRY, KILIKOLLOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. CRP.No.2834/01() 2 8. NAZARUDEEN, VATHOPPALLIL VEEDU, CHATHINAMKULAM CHERRY, KILIKOLLOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 9. SHIHABUDEEN, VATHOPPALLIL VEEDU, CHATHINAMKULAM CHERRY, KILIKOLLOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 10. ABDUL RASHEED, VATHOPPALLIL VEEDU, CHATHINAMKULAM CHERRY, KILIKOLLOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.N.ACHUTHA KURUP THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON C.M.P.NO.5979/01 IN CRP.2834/01 //DISMISSED// 14.12.2007 SD/= (K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE.) K.T.SANKARAN,J. -------------------------------------------------------- C.R.P.No.2834 OF 2001-C -------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 14th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2007 O R D E R On 03.12.2007, 10 days' time was granted to cure the defects. The defects are not cured. Today when the case is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The C.R.P. is dismissed for default. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE. dsn