IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.3677 of 2009. Decided on: March 19, 2010 Jagdish Chand Verma ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is a teacher appointed by the Parents Teachers Association. He is aggrieved since he has been replaced by the sixth respondent who is a regular teacher. There is also a contention that there are other vacancies still lying vacant where the sixth respondent can be accommodated without disturbing the petitioner. It is a matter for the petitioner to point out before the third respondent. In the event of the petitioner filing an appropriate representation before the third respondent, the matter will be duly considered by the third respondent on merit with notice to the petitioner and the sixth respondent and appropriate order in accordance with law and justice shall be passed by the third respondent 2 within another one month. It is made clear that in case the sixth respondent can be accommodated in any of the available vacancies pointed out by the petitioner, the third respondent will also see whether the petitioner can be retained in the school. The petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications. Dasti copy on usual terms. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 19, 2010 (Justice R.B. Misra), (rks) Judge.