IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20994 of 2010 SUNIL KUMAR SINGH @ SUNIL KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner:- Mr. Anil Kr. Singh, Adv. For the State:- Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ----------- 2. 25.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Considering that the petitioner was granted bail under Sections 395 of the Penal Code when he allegedly absconded from the trial for approximately one year and has now completed one month of custody, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with S. Tr. No. 183/1988 (arising out of Ekangar Sarai Parwalpur) P.S. Case No. 42 of 1987, upon furnishing an undertaking on affidavit that he is shall be appropriately represented on each date including his physical appearance on the dates that the Court below so directs and if he violates any of the two conditions, the Court below shall be at liberty to deal with him appropriately notwithstanding the present order. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)