2.wp-7124-11.doc jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7124 OF 2011 Jai Hind Sindhu Education Trust, Pune and Anr. ..Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Haresh Jagtiani Sr. Counsel along with Mr. Suprabh Jain and Ms. Priyam Dhamankar i/b M/s. Haresh Jagtiani and Associates for petitioners. Mrs. M.P.Thakur AGP for Respondent No.1. Mr. S.R.Ganbavale for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 CORAM : S.A.BOBDE AND SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J J. DATE : NOVEMBER 30, 2011. P.C.: 1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties. 2. After hearing the matter, the following order is passed by consent: (i) The Respondents shall consider the representation of the petitioners that the demand is not justified in view of the earlier exemption granted to the petitioners and in view of Section 132 (b) of the Bombay Provincial Municipal 1 2.wp-7124-11.doc Corporation Act, the respondents shall after hearing the petitioners, pass a reasoned order and communicate the same to the petitioners within a period of six weeks from the date of the appearance of the petitioners before the respondents-appropriate officer with the representation. (ii) The petitioners shall appear before the respondents on 12.12.2011. (iii) Till the respondents decide the representation of the petitioners, there shall be no coercive recovery and for a period of two weeks thereafter, in case the decision is adverse to the petitioners. 3. Rule is made absolute in the above terms. [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ S.A.BOBDE, J. ] 2