@/ Cycto7/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Wi’go. g g/mo SB. PETITIONER /Smt. Meena Shrivastava W/o Shri V.P. Khare, aged about 42 years, R/o Kail Nagar Sarkanda, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS / RESPONDENTS 1. )tate of Chhattisgarh , ”w. \0 Through Sccretry , Education /)‘.\- Department , D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (0G .3 Director of public 1nstrucion , ?ensionbada Raipur (CG J ,/ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226OF THE NSTITUTION OF INDIA M i} p a t GE) HEGH COURT OF CHHAfTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) No. 1083 of 200/ Pe'l‘ii'ioner : Sm‘r. Meena Shrivasfava Versus Respondenfs 5fa‘i‘e of Chhaf<fisgarh & ano'fher‘ singie Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Jusfice Sufish K. Agniho‘fri. Mr. Kumaresh Tiwari, Advocate for fhe pe‘ritioner. Smf. Anju Ahuja, Depu'fy Governmen‘i’ Advoca’i’e for *he Sfafe/respondenfs. O R D E R (Passed on fhis 26*” Day of February, 2007) Lzamed counsei appearing for The pe’rifioner submifis fha'r fhe pefi'rioner is working as Assis'fanf Teacher/Leomrer. The pefifioner ob'i’ained B. Ed. Exoména'fion cer‘fifico‘l'e on 14-7—1992, on his owri expenses. Learned courisei appearing. for 'i’he pe‘fi‘iioner submiis fho'r fhe quesi’ion involved, herein asio whefher The feacher, who ob’i’ained B. Ed. Examinafion Cer'fificofe on his own expenses is enfi‘l'ied ‘i'o fwo advance incremen‘fs. According To ieorned counsei ‘for The pe‘iifioner, fhe pe'l'ii'ioner is eniified 1’0 fwo advance incremen'fs in View of The decision of This Cour'i' in The case of Yoshwanf Kumar. Bhomdwaj Vs‘ Munioipai Corporafion, Dung and anofher' {2006 (H) MPJR-CG 96}. This Cour‘i in fhe ease of Yoshwon-i' Kumar Bharadwoj Vs. Municipal Corporo'rion, Burg and anofher (5upro), came fo The conciusion ‘fha‘i’ ihe feochers, who had obfained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examina‘i‘ion Cerfificai'e on Their own k) expenses, are cavered by The circuiar da‘fed 24.12.98 issued by fhe 5?:11'e Governmen‘f of Madhya Prades‘n. Learned counseE for- ‘Fne pefi'fianzr fur'i'her submé‘fs “fhaf fhe facts and ques'fion of iaw invoived in fine presen'f case are squareiy cavemd by decisiari 9f friis Cour‘i’ in fhe case of Vashwarri' Kumar Bhamdwag Vs. Muriicipal Carpom'i‘iori, DuFg and anofher (Supm), ’i'c) which bamed counsel appearing 'i‘or‘ The re5penden’fs fairly concedes and agrees wi'i'h fhe avermen'i’ made by iearned counsel appearing for 'i'he pei‘ifioner. Accordingly, ‘i'he wri‘l‘ pefi'i'ion is allowed in Terms of The order passed in l‘ne case 0f Vashwan‘i' Kumar Qhamdwaj Vs. Municipal Carpami‘ion, Dung and anofhen (Supra) subjecf 'h) verification of i’ne faci as io whei'her 'i’he pei‘i‘i’ioner has acquired B. Ed. Examinai’ion Cerfificai’e on his own expenses as per ”the circulars da‘i’ed 24.12.1998 6i 1.3.1999 and fur'fher whe'iher he has been paid irwo advance incremen'i's or not No order as To cosfs. #W l Sdl— Judge Subhash i Satish K. Agnihoti'i : 1_