IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH JANUARY 2011 / 22ND POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 38791 of 2010(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 884460077 CONSTABLE M.NARSIMHULU, CISF UNIT, CPT, COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.G.SASIDHARAN CHEMPAZHANTHIYIL SRI.S.VISHNU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE COMMANDANT, CISF UNIT, CPT, COCHIN - 682 003, W.ISLAND P.O. 2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, CISF, SOUTHERN SECTOR, RAJAJI BHAVAN, BASANT NAGAR CHENNAI, PIN - 600 001, BASANT NAGAR P.O. 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, CISF SOUTH SECTOR, CHPT CAMPUS, NEWR WAR MEMORIAL GATE, CHENNAI - 600 009, CHENNAI FORT P.O. 4. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, CISF, CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI - 110 001 LODHI P.O. ADV. SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN,ASST.S.G OF INDIA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No.38791 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 12th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner's grievance in this writ petition is that he has been abruptly transferred from Cochin to Neyveli without even issuing a transfer order, but issuing a movement order. The petitioner seeks the following reliefs; “1. A writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 3rd respondent to consider the retention of the petitioner in the present station for a period of 3 more moths ie. till the end of the academic year. 2. A writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P2 and keep in abeyance Exhibit P1, till this is done. 3. A writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ or order to call for the records leading to the issue of Exhibit P1 and set aside Exhibit P1.” 2. On 31.12.2010, this Court passed the following interim order: Learned standing counsel appearing for respondents 1 to 4 submits that the family of the petitioner will be accommodated in the present quarters occupied by the petitioner till the end of the academic year 31.3.2011. The submission is recorded. Post on 3.1.2011 for getting instructions.” 3. A statement has been filed on behalf of the respondents, wherein it has been stated that the decision to transfer was taken as early as on 13.4.2010. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has never been either informed about the same or served with any order in respect of the same. He would submit that if the w.p.c.38791/10 2 petitioner is transferred in the middle of the academic year, he and his family would suffer inconvenience. In the above circumstances, the petitioner seeks a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 expeditiously. 4. Having heard the learned Assistant Solicitor General also, while recording the assurance given about the permission to the petitioner to continue occupation of the quarters till 31.3.2011, as is evident from the order dated 31.12.2010, in this case, I direct the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P2 and pass appropriate orders thereon taking into account all the facts and circumstances of the case, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within ten days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge