THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.1455 of 2008 Date : 31-8-2010 Between : E.Anjaneyulu Goud s/o.Ramulu Goud Occ: T.F.T. Licence holder of Komshetpalli Toddy Shop, Marpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District .. Petitioner And The Prohibition & Excise Superintendent, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District, Excise Bhavan, Nampally, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri B.Sai Ram Goud Counsel for respondents : A.G.P. for Prohibition & Excise The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.1455 of 2008 ORDER: At the Interlocutory stage, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing for disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner, who is a holder of T.F.T. licence, filed this Writ Petition assailing show cause notice issued by 1st respondent on 10-12-2007 whereby the petitioner is called upon to explain why his licence dated 29-10-2006 in respect of Counter No.12 shall not be cancelled. Though the petitioner has not specifically pleaded in the explanation submitted by him in reply to the show cause notice or in the Writ Petition, at the hearing Sri B.Sai Ram Goud, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the 1st respondent is seeking to proceed to pass a final order for cancellation of his T.F.T. licence even before receiving report from the chemical analysis laboratory on the second sample stated to have been sent by respondent No.1 at the request of the petitioner. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Prohibition & Excise, however, stated that no material is placed on record to show that respondent No.1 has sent the second sample for chemical analysis. Be that as it may, as the Writ Petition is filed questioning the show cause notice, I am not inclined to entertain the same as it is not the case of the petitioner that respondent No.1 has no jurisdiction to issue the show cause notice. The petitioner is entitled to raise all legally sustainable objections to the show cause notice. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed. If respondent No.1 has sent the second sample for chemical analysis, he shall consider the report thereon, if any, sent by the chemical analysis laboratory before passing final order in pursuance of the show cause notice. As a sequel to the dismissal of the Writ Petition, W.V.M.P.No.1379/2008 and W.P.M.P.No.1744/2008 are disposed of as infructuous. No costs. ________________________ Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Date : 31-8-2010 AM