Civil Revision No. 4521 of 2011(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4521of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision : 27.07.2011 Deepika Khanna ....Petitioner Versus Balbir Kaur ....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** Present: Mr. Amardeep Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL) This is tenant's revision petition challenging the impugned order dated 26.05.2011 whereby his appeal was dismissed against the order of his eviction dated 15.09.2009 passed by Rent Controller, Jalandhar on the ground that petitioner has failed to deposit the provisional rent as assessed by the Rent Controller vide order dated 27.08.2009. Admittedly, the order dated 27.08.2009 making provisional assessment of rent by the Rent Controller was never challenged by the petitioner. It has been authoritative laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Rajan @ Raj Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar in Civil Revision No.3577 of 2006 decided on 7.1.2010 that if the tenant fail to make Civil Revision No. 4521 of 2011(O&M) 2 payment of the provisionally assessed rent upto the stipulated date then the eviction order has to be passed and the Rent Controller has no jurisdiction to extend such time or give another opportunity to the tenant to make payment of provisionally assessed rent. In view of the aforesaid authoritative law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in Rajan @ Raj Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar (supra), I find no merit in this revision petition. Dismissed. 27.7.2011 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) savita Judge