IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 718 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 28 OF 2006 THE GOA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT ....Applicant CORPORATION LTD. Versus THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND ....Respondents COMMISSIONER, S. R. O., AND 12 ORS., Mr. Vijay A. Palekar, Advocate for the applicant. Coram:- J. N. PATEL, J. Date:- 10th November, 2006 P.C. The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that respondents no.3, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12 and 13 are not served as they are not found to be residing at their given address and therefore seeks extension of time and further to serve them by substitute service by way of publication. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The applicant to take steps to serve the respondents within four weeks. J. N. PATEL, J. ef.