IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1014 of 2003 (M/B) 1. Himalayan Stone Crusher Private Ltd. through its Director Gyanesh Kumar 2. Jai Durga Stone Mills through its partner Ashwini Kumar Bansal 3. Shri Shakti Stone Crusher through its partner. Vinod Kumar Bansal 4. Sri Laxmi Crusher Pvt. Ltd. through its Manager Sudhir Mehta 5. Badkoti Stone Crushes through its Director Smt. Anita Badkoti ……. Petitioners Versus 1. Zila Panchayat, Haridwar through its Adhyaksha 2. District Magistrate, Haridwar 3. Senior Superintendent of Police, District Haridwar. 4. Madhukar Sharma s/o Deen Dayal Sharma r/o Madhu Niketan, Kharkari, Haridwar …… Respondents ……… Petitioners’ counsel absent. Sri Sharad Sharma, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Sri Subhash Upadhayaya, Standing Counsel for respondents 2 and 3. None for respondent no. 4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Petitioners’ counsel absent. Sri Sharad Sharma, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Sri Subhash Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for respondents 2 & 3. None for respondent no. 4. 2. Sri Sharma, the learned counsel for respondent no. 1- Zila Panchayat, Haridwar submits that the writ petition filed by petitioners challenging the imposition of loading/unloading charges by Zila Panchayat is not maintainable in view of the judgment dated 07.04.2003 passed in Writ Petition No. 211 of 2003 (M/B) whereby the imposition of loading and unloading fee by Nagar Palika Parishad was upheld. 3. As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 13.07.2006 13.07.2006 A