RFA 196 of 2001 12.11.2010 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent. RFA No. 196 of 2001 The plaintiff Devi Kaulan through Tulsi Ram had instituted the suit, out of which the present appeal arises, for claiming the possession and demolition of the structure purportedly unauthorized and illegally constructed by the defendants S/Shri Roshan Lal, Vidya Prakash, Jai Singh and Smt. Prema Devi on the land owned and possessed by the plaintiff comprised in Khata Khatoni No. 638 min/862 Khasra Nos. 3556/3553/3523 and 521/768 measuring 8 biswas situated in Phati Raila Kothi Bhallan Sub Tehsil Sainj, District Kullu. The suit was contested by the appellants herein on a number of grounds. On the settled issues, the learned trial Court found in favour of the plaintiff and granted the decree of possession of the suit land in the following terms: “36. As a result of my findings on the above issues, suit of the plaintiff for vacant possession of the suit land after demolition of structures built thereon, i.e. Khata Khatoni No. 638 min/862 Khasra No. 3556/3553/3523 and 521/768 measuring 8 biswas situate in Phati Raila Kothi Bhallan Sub Tehsil Sainj Distt. Kullu, is decreed with costs of the suit. Decree sheet be prepared accordingly and file, after completion, be consigned to the record room.” The defendants appealed. Both the parties namely appellant No.4 and the plaintiff are present in Court today and effort for reconciliation was made by learned counsel for both the parties. It is accepted by the parties that appellant No. 2 and 3 have no interest in the suit property and it is only appellant No. 1 Roshan Lal and appellant No. 4 Jai Singh, who are interested on the outcome of this litigation. According to the compromise arrived at between the parties, it has been agreed and accepted that all arrears i.e. lease money upto 28th February, 2010 has been paid in Court today, which fact has been accepted by the respondent-plaintiff. It is also acknowledged that lease money for the suit property shall be Rs.880/- per annum payable on and w.e.f. 28th February, 2010, which amount has also been paid upto 28th February, 2011. Henceforth, the annual lease amount of Rs. 880/- per annum shall be paid annually by the appellants w.e.f. 1stMarch, 2011 and payable in advance on or before 31st March of every year. Statements of appellant No. 4 and Shri Tulsi Ram acting on behalf of the plaintiff Sh. Jai Singh appellant have been recorded, accepting the terms of this compromise. The plaintiff also prays that since the entire dispute has been settled, permission to withdraw the suit may be granted. It is accordingly directed that suit is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the compromise so arrived at between the parties. Court fee be refunded in accordance with law. Appeal also stands disposed of. November 12, 2010 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge