1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1520 OF 2006 PETITION NO.1520 OF 2006 PETITION NO.1520 OF 2006 Narayan Ramchandra Jadhav .. Petitioner versus 1. Baban Dharma Jadhav & ors.. Respondents Mr.Vilas Mali,Advocate for Petitioner Ms.U.V.Kejriwal, A.P.P.for Respondents CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : J.N.PATEL AND J.N.PATEL AND J.N.PATEL AND SMT.ROSHAN SMT.ROSHAN SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ DALVI, JJ DALVI, JJ DATED DATED DATED : : : 13th September, 2006 13th September, 2006 13th September, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The petitioner is seeking a very restricted relief in this petition on the basis of the allegations that certain documents have been forged by his relatives to usurp the properties belonging to him. The petitioner instead of lodging a report in the matter addressed a letter to Mr.Sidhram 2 Mehetre, Hon’ble MInister for State for Home, Mantralaya, Mumbai with copies to various authorities. The concerned police station i.e. Sahar police station certified it as N.C.No.1119 (or 149/2005) which the petitioner has not challenged. In our view, a civil suit is the real remedy. It will be proper on the part of the petitioner to seek an alternative remedy by filing a complaint case before the learned Magistrate as this court is not inclined to exercise its extra-ordinary jurisdiction in the facts and circumtances of the case. 2. Petition is dismissed. (Smt (Smt (Smt Roshan Dalvi,J) Roshan Dalvi,J) Roshan Dalvi,J) (J.N.Patel, (J.N.Patel, (J.N.Patel, J) J) J)