THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1575 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioners filed a suit for the relief of perpetual injunction against respondent Nos.4 and 5, through Receive and Transmit Petition No.71 of 2010 with a request to receive the suit, number it, and transmit the same to the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Jangareddygudem, West Godavari District. They have also filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. in respect of the suit schedule property. This Court passed an order, dated 12.01.2010, directing that status quo obtaining as on that date shall be maintained for ten weeks and directed transmission of the suit. This writ petition is filed alleging that respondent Nos.4 and 5 are violating the order of status quo and in spite of repeated requests, respondent Nos.1 and 2, the authorities of the Police Department, and respondent No.3, the Tahsildar, Koyyalagudem Mandal, are not extending any help. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Home for respondent Nos.1 and 2, the learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent No.3 and the learned counsel for respondent No.4. There is a serious dispute among various parties in respect of Acs.5.53 cents of land in R.S.Nos.570, 818/3 and 819/3 of Parimpudi Village, Koyyalagudem Mandal, West Godavari District. While the petitioners claim that property on the strength of a Will said to have been executed by their father, respondent No.4 and others state that the Will has since been revoked and the property was settled in favour of third parties. O.S.No.789 of 2009 filed by respondent No.4 is pending in the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Jangareddygudem, West Godavari District. The occasion for a plaintiff in a suit to file a writ petition seeking police protection would arise only when (a) an order of temporary injunction is passed in the I.A. filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. has become final, (b) an application under Section 151 C.P.C. for grant of police protection is ordered and (c) despite the same, the Station House Officer concerned is not extending the police help. In the instant case, the proceedings are at the threshold. At the most, the order of status quo can be compared to the one of ad-interim injunction granted by the trial Court. The petitioners cannot seek police protection on the strength of such order. It is not as if the petitioners are without any remedy. In the event of the order of status quo is being violated, they can pursue their remedy under Order 39 Rule 2-A C.P.C. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioners to work out their remedies in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:23.02.2010. Note: Issue cc in two days. (B/o) kdl