IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3082 OF 2008 Shri Sakharam Ganesh Aaravandekar & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus Shri Janardan Vinayak Mathkar & Ors....Respondents ...... Mr.Sudhir Prabhu for Petitioners. Mr.A.S.Khandeparkar i/b M/s.Khandeparkar & Associates for Respondent No.5. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JULY 8, 2008. JULY 8, 2008. JULY 8, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. The Appellate Court has considered all relevant matters and recorded finding of fact that the Petitioners failed to adduce any evidence to substantiate their claim that they were in possession prior to 1970. In fact, the documentary evidence would indicate contrary to the stand of the Petitioners. : 2 : 3. Suffice it to observe that some error here or there committed by the lower Court cannot be the basis to exercise writ jurisdiction. No manifest error has been brought to my notice. The argument of the Petitioners that having regard to the approach of the first Court, the Petitioners lost opportunity to pursue remedy of one right of appeal, does not commend to me. No such grievance was made before the Appellate Court. Instead, the Petitioners called upon the Appellate Court to consider the entire matter on its own merits, which has been done by the Appellate Court. It is too late in the day for the Petitioners to make grievance that right of appeal is lost. No interference is warranted. Hence, dismissed. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.