THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH C.R.P.Nos.6308 and 6321 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: In both these civil revision petitions, the parties are one and the same. Hence, they are being taken up together for disposal by way of common order. The petitioner herein is the defendant in the suit filed by the respondent herein for recovery of amount basing on Ex.A-1-suit pronote. In the said suit, the petitioner herein filed two applications i.e., I.A.No.463 of 2009 under Section 151 CPC to permit him to sign on white paper three times in the open Court and I.A.No.464 of 2009 under Section 151 CPC to send the document i.e., paper containing signature of the defendant taken in open court and Ex.A-1-suit pronote to the Government Handwriting Expert, Forensic Science Laboratory, Hyderabad, for comparison of his disputed signature on Ex.A-1 suit pronote with that of his admitted signatures. The court below, vide its orders, dated 29-09-2009, dismissed the said applications. Aggrieved thereby, the present Civil Revision Petitions are filed. Though the petitioner is directed to sign on white papers in the open court, it cannot be said that he will not change his signature and that he will not deviate from his signature when he alleged to have signed on Ex.A-1 suit pronote. However, in a case like this, where the rebuttable evidence is available, insofar as execution of negotiable instrument is concerned, such rebuttable evidence can only be adduced and produced by sending the disputed signature on Ex.A-1 suit pronote for comparison with that of the admitted signatures of the defendant to the expert’s opinion. Therefore, I am of the opinion that the court below had rightly dismissed both the applications and this Court does not find any infirmity, legal or otherwise in the impugned orders as to call for interference by this Court. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 08-07-2011 Prv