1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.03.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P.(MD).No.2289 of 2011 M.Vazhivittan (Minor), rep.by his father & natural guardian A.Muniyasamy, Madurai. ... Petitioner Vs. M/s. Indian Bank, Through its Branch Manager, Avaniyapuram Branch, Madurai. ... Respondent Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to process the loan application submitted by the petitioner along with his father as a co-applicant dated 14.09.2010 and consequently sanction the loan. For Petitioner : Mrs.C.Mayil Vahana Rajendran For Respondent : Mr.R.Pandivel Standing Counsel ORDER The petitioner who is a student seeking for an education loan. His contention is that the Bank has not sanctioned the loan on the ground that his address is not correct. Though he submitted all other documents and earlier, he was assured by the respondent that he would be given the education loan, he was not granted. Therefore, he has come forward with the Writ Petition. 2. On notice, learned Standing Counsel for the Bank would contend that the loan amount was not sanctioned due to the fact that the address given in the application form differs from the address given in the ration card. Therefore, they are not in a position to process the application. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3.Heard both sides. By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The only request of the petitioner is that he wants to consider his representation / application for grant of educational loan for doing his B.E. first year in Raja College of Engineering and Technology at Veerapanjur, Madurai District. He would contend before this Court that his ration card address is also now modified/altered/amended as that found in the application form. He now presently resides in that address as found in the ration card. Therefore, there is no impediment for the respondent for granting the education loan. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent now submits that if the ration card is produced before the respondent, they are prepared to verify and then they are ready to consider the claim of the petitioner, as per the norms. 6. In view of the above, the petitioner is directed to approach the respondent with all the relevant documents and on production of the relevant documents, the respondent will consider the same forthwith and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law for grant of education loan, preferably, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands allowed. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (LA) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To The Branch Manager, M/s. Indian Bank, Avaniyapuram Branch,Madurai. +1cc to Mr.R.Pandivel, Advocate, Sr.No.7516 +1cc to Mr.C.Mayil Vahana Rajendran, Advocate, Sr.No.7506 ssm akm/25.03.11 /2p-4c/ W.P.(MD).No.2289 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/