-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2060 OF 2005 Moreshwar Yeshwant Karnik ..Applicant Vs. Smt.Sushila Ravindra Tellure & Anr. ..Respondents Ms.Ashar Pallav for Mr.A.M.Saraogi Advocate for Applicant Mr.S.R.Shinde,A.P.P. for the State CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JUNE 9, 2005 DATE : JUNE 9, 2005 DATE : JUNE 9, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking quashing of process issued against him under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 427 r.w. 34 of the IPC. The said process has been issued by the learned Judicial Magistrate F.C.Ulhasnagar in criminal complaint No.2454 of 2000. In the said case, the complaint has been filed by Smt.Sushila Telore. In the said complaint, Smt.Sushila Telore has specifically stated that on 6.4.2000 the present applicant along with other accused came near her house and they caused damage to the shed of the complainant. The damage was to the tune of Rs.12,000/-. The complainant Sushila Telore has further stated that the applicant and other accused abused her at that -2- time calling her a ‘prostitute’ and giving various other abuses. She also stated that the accused persons gave her pushes and it is also stated by her that the accused persons including the applicant gave her threats. Looking to the material on record, the process has been rightly issued by the learned Magistrate. No case is made out for quashing the process. The Magistrate shall not be influenced by any observations made in this order while deciding the trial. 3. Application is rejected. [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J]