SCA/9219/2006 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 9219 of 2006 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. - Petitioner(s) Versus CHAGANJI NAGARJI THAKOR & 2 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR MAULIK J SHELAT for Petitioner(s) : 1, RULE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 1, MR YM THAKORE for Respondent(s) : 1, MR RAKESH R PATEL for Respondent(s) : 2, UNSERVED-EXPIRED (R) for Respondent(s) : 3, ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI Date : 01/08/2006 ORAL JUDGMENT At the joint request of the learned advocates the matter is taken up for final disposal. The SCA/9219/2006 2/2 JUDGMENT present is the petition filed by the United India Insurance Company Limited. The relief prayed for is that a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction or order be issued quashing and setting aside the impugned judgement and decree passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Patan in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.645 of 2002 (Old MACP No.572 of 1992) dated 9th December 2005. The award is of Rs.9999/-. Without going into the merits of the matter only on the ground that the amount being a meagre amount, the present petition is not entertained. 2. At the request of the learned advocate for the petitioner, Mr.Shelat, it is clarified that rejection of this petition shall not prejudice the contentions, to be raised by the company in other pending proceedings (First Appeal No.1149 of 2006). Rule is discharged. Interim relief is vacated. No order as to costs. (RAVI R. TRIPATHI, J.) karim