1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22/12/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.BASHA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.P.(MD)No.14814 of 2011 C. Periyammal ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Commissioner of Land Administration Chepauk, Chennai. 2. The District Collector Trichirapalli District. 3. The Tahsildar Musiri Taluk Office Trichirapalli District. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the second and third respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 29/11/2011 and issue Patta for the land in Survey No.175 situates at Veliyanur Village, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District and consequently forbearing the respondents from interfering with petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the above property without due process of law. For petitioner : Mr.D.Shanmugaraja Sethupathi For Respondent : Mr.S.Chandrasekaran, GA O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by K.N.BASHA,J] The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for the relief of a direction to the second and third respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 29/11/2011 and issue Patta for the land in Survey No.175 situates at Veliyanur Village, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District and consequently forbear the respondents from interfering with petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the above property. 2. By mutual consent of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.Chandrasekaran, learned Government Advocate https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 appearing for the respondents, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing, at the admission stage itself. 3. Mr.D.Shanmugaraja Sethupathi, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that though the petitioner has come forward with a larger prayer, it is now submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is given to the second and third respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 29/11/2011 on the basis of the revenue records and other materials relied on by the petitioner and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame. 4. Heard the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. In view of the limited prayer made today before this Court by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without going into the merits of the petitioner dated 29/11/2011 and without expressing any view on the said representation, inclined to direct the second and third respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 29/11/2011 in the light of the documents to be relied by the petitioner by affording opportunity to the petitioner and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time there shall be an order of interim injunction in respect of the possession of the disputed property of the petitioner. 6. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (Writs) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1. The Commissioner of Land Administration Chepauk, Chennai. 2. The District Collector, Trichirapalli District. 3. The Tahsildar, Musiri Taluk Office, Trichirapalli District. +1 CC to Mr.D.Shanmugaraja Sethupathi, Advocate (SR.No.45266) W.A.(MD) No.14841 of 2011 22/12/2011 mvs NSV/22.12.11/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/