IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WP(S) No. J^TTL^ OF 2006 Smt. Chandralata Rai -KgeBT EFi^fM •l»MiU,{~j RESPONDENTS .^ A":v ..•' y ••" .V -• ^yy/ .••" ^v' ••* '^w/ ^^/ '^r >^^ w iouf49 years W/o Dr. P.K.Rai Occupation: Service Working as Project Officer ^ Integrated Child Development Project Block Pgdi Uproda, Tehsil Katghora District Korba, Chhattisgarh V E R S LLS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Government of Chhattisgarh Department ofWomen and Child Development, Mantralaya DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Director, Directorate of Women and Child Development „, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Shri Ravi Kumar Sharma Project Officer Integrated Child Development Project, Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDJER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAIV1US, ORDER OR DIRECTION OR THE LIKE. XI-HC-78 3^'"qi<!)lfli|, Olfl+1'IS, Rldlfl^ ^MC^I ShW^ W3; 200 sn^rira^? ('^fgg^sT) SII^T ^iT f^TRi ^TT 3T1^T sbHjeh SRiTWnfsg'sn^r 20.7., Shri teinbir Singh Marhas, A Ivocate for the petitioner. <t)]''<I<'i<i1'< wHvfi if fs^S <Riwu ^srf^R'sn^T 5hri Sumesh Bajaj, Sovemm^nt Advocate for respondent Nos.1 A 2 on advance copy. l-1eard. By this petition -t+ie petition^r, who is working as Project Officer Inte9roted Child Development l^roject, Block Podi Uproda, Tehsil Kathghora, District Korba.hos d^a\\enged her tnmsfer order dated 6.7.2006 (Annexure P-1) whereby ^ie has been tronsferred to Batewand, District Bdstar. llehqe ii The main ground of challe|ige is •that the petitioner is heart' patient, she is regularly taking tre^itment at CTMS, Bila^iur and she has been transferred at the distance of 650 kms from Korba and even at present the petitioner is hospitalpzed. Being a heart' patient it is not possible for the petitioner to jom and perform her ckities at Botewcuid, District Bastar and for which d|ie has already made representation (Annexure P-5) to the Under Sec^etary, Deparhnent of Women & Child Development, Raipur. Learned counsel for the pe^itioner submitted that looking to the heatth condition of •the petitioner ^nd being a female emptoyee, she may be allowed to make a representa^ion to respondent No.2 and in -hjrn P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3^'BTplRpT^ STflu'l®,fs|dlti^< *11*IMI SbW^ W!; 200 sn^rqriTi^TN? <raT3I1^Tsf)ti 3T[^5TV^K (iy?^c| (^ST) ^ 4< c 3~' ^^J irw(ifi@'3n^r 7 counbel respondent No.2 be directed to to which leamed fiovemment Ad\ Having heard leamed the facts and circumstances of on the merit of the case, Ihe representation to req»ondentN^. copy of "this petitton and in representation of petitioner wit^iin the representatwn after con^i petitioner in accordance with katj. •the effect and operation of im{ P-l) in respect of the petitioner With the direction aforeskid Consequently, M.C^.)P. stands disposed of. Cert'ified copy oe per rutei ^rafa^T WfRff ff fecfl-rfSTRK ^srf^q'sn^r {Jecide the same in accordcnce with law, ^ocate for the State has no objection. for the porties wid having regard to fhe case, without expressirq ony opinion p|etitioner is dlbwed to mate a detailed 1.2 within 10 ctays from today abng with jhim, req>ondent No.2 to decide the it(iin 30 ttays from •the date of re<»iptof i^idering all •the pohts raised by the j. Till -rtie decision of -the representation, nfjugned order cbrted 6.7.2006 (^nnexure ^hall reniain stnyed. is^id. the petition stnnds disposed of. No.2768/2006 & I.A. No.6934/06 also Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.