IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-24474 of 2008 Date of decision : 30.9.2008 Manoj .....Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: None for for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Mor, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana **** S. D. ANAND, J. The only grievance of the petitioner-prisoner is that furlough came to be granted to his similar circumstanced brother co-accused; whereas it was declined to him without any reason. Learned State counsel is not in a position to challenge the factual premise of the above averment. The petition shall stand disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to dispose of the furlough plea of the petitioner within 15 days from today afresh in the light of observation made by this Court. It will be for the State counsel to communicate the order to the competent authority. Copy of the order be given to the learned State counsel under the signatures of the Court Secretary. September 30, 2008 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE