Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr. MMO No.52 of 2010 Date of Decision: April 28, 2010. L.R. Balley and others. …..… Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. …. Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the Petitioners : Mr. Naveen Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Addl. Advocate General with Mr. J.S. Rana, Asstt. Advocate General. Surinder Singh, J (oral): By the instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners have challenged the application of Section 153-A of the Indian Penal Code in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. Heard. 3. The matter is still under investigation and the investigation in a cognizable case is in the complete domain of the police. By virtue of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure or under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, their powers cannot be curtailed. Further this case does not fall within the purview of rarest or rare case, where the Court can interfere at this stage, thus calls for no interference. The 2 petition is dismissed in limine. However, the petitioners are at liberty to take any or all these grounds take in this petition at the time of haring on charge(s) in the court. Cr.M.P.No.179 of 2010. Dismissed as infructuous April 28, 2010. (Surinder Singh) (Pds) Judge.