1 Civil Appln.No.2913.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2913 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.3323 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri S.K.Shinde, Advocate for applicants. ShriA.A.Joshi,Advocate for Resp.No.2 .... CORAM: K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 09th DECEMBER,2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. Though, respondent No.1 is served, no one appeared on his behalf, when the matter was called out. 2. Present Civil Application is preferred by the applicants-original claimants for condonation of 21 days delay, in preferring Appeal against the the Judgment and Award dated 04th July, 2009, passed by the Motor Accident Claims 2 Civil Appln.No.2913.10 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Tribunal, Sangamner, in Motor Accident Claim Petition NO. 898 of 2002. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicants submits that because of financial crises, it remain on the part of the applicants to take immediate steps to prefer the appeal in time. 4. The learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 opposed the present Civil Application on the ground that the applicants have not given sufficient cause to condone the delay of 21 days. 5. Considering the reason given in para No.4 of the Civil Application and submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, the same is allowed in terms of prayer Clause [B], 3 Civil Appln.No.2913.10 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders which reads as under: “[B] The delay of 21 days caused in filing of aforesaid First Appeal be condoned in the interest of justice.” Sd/- [K.K. TATED, J.] MTK