1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Criminal Writ Petition No.384/2008 (Pramod Baburao Namewar .vs. State of Mah and one ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders ======================================= Ms. Sangita Gaikee, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. J.B. Jaiswal, APP for the Respondents. .......... CORAM : K.J. ROHEE &, A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 16, 2008 1. Heard. 2. By communication dated 3.7.2008 the Competent Authority informed the petitioner that the surety proposed by him namely Sou. Annu Dilip Verma does not own any immovable property, besides this she and her husband are habitual criminals and as such the petitioner should propose any other surety. Instead of proposing any other surety, the petitioner has moved this Court for accepting the same surety. In view of the Police report, we are not prepared to entertain the petition. The same is, therefore, dismissed. Needless to say that in case the petitioner proposes any other surety, the 2 Competent Authority shall consider it. 3. The fees of the Advocate appointed for the petitioner are quantified at Rs.750/-. JUDGE JUDGE halwai