-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Contempt Petition No.102 of 2007 in Writ Petition No.2745 of 2005 Mr.Mohammed Suleman Ansari ..Petitioner vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and another ..Respondents Ms.S.P.Srivastava for petitioner. Mr.A.Y.Sakhare, Sr.Counsel i/b Ms.Shobha Ajithkumar for respondent Corporation. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J 22nd October,2007 22nd October,2007 22nd October,2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Mr.Sakhare, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent Municipal Corporation, after taking instructions from Mr.Sonawane, incharge Maunicipal Commissioner, H/East Ward, B.M.C., states that the petitioner can appear before the said authority/officer on any date and time convenient to him, even in this week and the concerned officer would thereafter act in accordance with the order and directions of this Court and pass appropriate orders so also communicate the order to the petitioner within a period of 10 days from the date of his appearance. Ms.Srivastava states that the petitioner would -2- appear before the concerned Assistant Commissioner on Thursday the 25th October, 2007 at 11 a.m.with all the record in his possessiokn so as to enable the Assistant Commissioner to deal with the request for carrying out repairs. 2. Mr.Sakhare states that the concerned officer tenders unconditional apology for failing to pass necessary orders in accordance with the directions of this Court. Mr.Sakhare states that there were other difficulties in as much as such enquiries were going on within the Commissioner’s office with regard to the subject premises. The delay is, therefore, not intentional but had occured on account of exigencies of work. Unconditional apology is accepted and the contempt petition is disposed of with the directions as above. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)