IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-32679 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: November 01, 2011 Varinder Singh @ Babbu and another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & another .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. G.S. Verma, Advocate, for the petitioners. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. prays for quashing FIR No.64 dated 14.9.2011 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 307, 324, 34 IPC, registered with Police Station, Begowal, District Kapurthala, on the basis of compromise dated 18.10.2011 (Annexure P-2). 2. On going through the FIR, I find that allegations against Varinder Singh @ Babbu (petitioner No.1) for causing injuries to the complainant are rather serious. The manner in which the injured were pursued for causing injuries shows the criminal Crl. Misc. No. M-32679 of 2011 [2] intent and act of the petitioners. Relevant portion of the FIR reads as under:- “...... Varinder Singh said to me that Yesterday why you had pushed me, now you give me push then I said that why I should give you push then his brother Sukhwinder Singh @ Chhotu raised lalkara and said that Bhaji today Haddi be taught a lesson, he should not go scot free. On saying this Varinder take out kirch from his dub and started giving kirch blow with an intention to kill me, he gave first kirch blow hit on the lower right side of my chest, second blow hit on my left flank. I raised noise “Bachao-Bachao” and tried to run away, then 4/5 karams ahead I fell down. Varinder Singh followed me and again continuously gave two blows of kirch on my left side on back and he again tried to give kirch blow, then I raised my left arm then the kirch blow hit on the shoulder of left arm. On hearing my noise my brother Harjit Singh and Nirmal Singh above said and other people reached the spot, on seeing them, Varinder Singh and Sukhwinder Singh above said ran away from the spot on motor cycle alongwith their weapons.” 3. In the considered opinion of this Court, it would not be in the interest of justice to quash the FIR, even though it might be claimed that disputes have been settled by way of compromise. 4. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) November 01, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?