1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:04.05.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P(MD)NO.5486 of 2011 C.Pitchai ...Petitioner .vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Samayanallur Sub-Division, Madurai District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Nagamalai Pudukkottai, Madurai. ...Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission to perform cultural programme on the occasion of Arulmighu Manthaiamman Temple Festival to be held on 10.5.2011 at K.Pudur, Alampatti, Madurai. For Petitioner :M/s.S.Balamurugan For Respondents :Mr.V.Rajasekaran Special Govt.Pleader ORDER The Writ Petitioner has filed the above Writ Petiion to direct the respondents to grant permission to perform cultural programme on the occasion of Arulmighu Manthaiamman Temple Festival to be held on 10.05.2011 at K.Pudur,Alampatti, Madurai. 2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petitioner sent a representation to the respondents on 29.04.2011. However, accoding to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the respondents have not considered the representation sent by the petitioner. 3. The learned Special Government Pleader on instruction submitted that if permission is granted to the writ petitioner to perform cultural https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 programme at Arulmighu Manthaiamman Temple Festival to be held on 10.5.2011 at K.Pudur,Alampatti, Madurai, it would lead to law and order problem in the area. Therefore, according to the learned Special Government Pleader, permission should not be granted to the writ petitioner. 4. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader, since the respondents have not passed any orders in the representation dated 29.4.2011 sent by the writ petitioner, I deem it just and proper to direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 29.4.2011 sent by the petitioner, on merits and in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, I direct the respondents to consider the representation sent by the petitioner, dated 29.4.2011 and pass suitabe orders on merits and in accordance with law on or before 09.05.2011. 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(LA) /TRUE COPY/ Assistant Registrar To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Samayanallur Sub-Division, Madurai District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Nagamalai Pudukkottai, Madurai. +1cc to Mr.S.Balamurugan, Advocate SR.No.16411 +1cc to The Special Govt.Pleader SR.No.16496 W.P(MD)NO.5486 of 2011 04.05.2011 vsn PA/05.05.2011/2P/6C(IT) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/