s*^ BENG ss ^f o IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (0 No. \Zo /QQ66 2-00'^ PETITIONER ^ry' - Pyare Singh, Son of Late ' j,y- Shri Saheb Singh, aged about <^p/^' •• 48 years, resident of Qr. No. j^i^/ ^••'^y' B-748, Yamuna Vihar, Plot /^y' -•^''^' ^ N0.3, Jamanipali, N.T.P.C. Korba, TahasU - Katghora, District-Korba (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS ..^^\.^ f^y^ .-.y-^^v' ^'^^ y^ ^-•~- ^•~ a;^ ^1< Ganga Bai @ Rani daughter of Umed Singh, aged about 42 years, resident of Dipika, Near S.E.C.L. Colony, Peon, Adarsh Higher Secondary School, Dipika, Tahasil - Katghora, District Korba (C.G.). 2. District Magistrate, Korba, District - Korba (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS, ORDER/ORDERS. DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS ETC. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^S^^^^^S^^^S^eS^S XI-HC-78 3:n^T^R-<icb (raTSITWsftllf 3^ •^|i|ld'i<, ®T(I+I'IS,Rlcll+fy (~^> iTTO^ITgwraT'^^"""""""" ^ 200^ 311^!*1 4s|«b(tcltds"<.ff) ?^fTW:trf?(T3n^r 31.1.2007 Shri M.K. Sinha, leaml The petitioner by fhe order of Aruiexure P/ 12 p^ssed whereby fhe appUcation of inaiutenaace of Rs. 500/ - p| ttiat extent fb.e earlier ordeil ofthe plaiatifi'has been iaod|ined. (uistatit petition tias impiigned Uie jissed ia Civil Suit No. 100-A/04 fhe defendant for au. award of ;r inonth has beea allowed suid to of teinporan' injiinction ia favour fUe Leamed couusel for respondent/ defendaitt, who| had procured the consent Court under Section 1251 petitiouer discovered Uiat suppressing certaia facts, and pei-petual iajiinction inaiatenance bv the criin: application for teinporarv iq his appUcation for tenipo recover}' proceedings in piu passed by the criraia| respondent/defendant niov' raaiatenance as ordered bv .iabl +l<i)l'fl'ifl^ ^|t<efTfffci<a <RlWI<. ^;3Tf^R'3n^T :d couusel for the petitioner. the petitioner submits tliat Uie is wtfe of the petitioner/plaintiiT, ortler of raamtenance from. a criminal of Cr.P.C. Hozvever, when tlie aforesaid order was procured by Ue filed a civil suit for declaration agamst fhe oid.er of grant of mtnal Court and also nioved aa ic(juiiction. The civil Court allowed >k~an- iiiiiinction aucl stayed fhe tsuance of the m.aintenaace order Court. Thereafter, tlie •d au application for graat of Iflie cnmm.al Coiirt and fhe Coui-t XI-HC-78 3.11^1 qiT^jch craTsn^rsOTW IU ^ '^ *<1*1WI Sh^lcb 3^ r<ii<<ici'M, »Tntf'i6,(sicii^y . (AiY-Cc) 120 W! 200^ 3ii^i ><a<*i ('i^f^'5!^) ^arwHfN'w^T below by the impugned 01 petttioner to pay Rs.500/ Learaed coiuisel for the order of inamtenEuice cann fhat extent fhe Court below I'der (Aruiexure P/12) directed tb.e I- per icionfh to tlie respoadent. ^etitioner fui'fher subniits that the .bt be granted iu a civil suit aiid to Iias coiuiaitted jurisdictional en'or. I have heard leameld perused the rmpugned oixle^ By the inipugned or Diodi&ed/clarified the orde) fhe recoverv of inaintenancli consideration tlie overaU cit-ci case, no case is inade o| impugned order by Uiis 4 jurisdiction vested under Iildia. Accordingly, fhe peti^ion admission stage itself aud i; «hi'iifci41-fii*«-i1fftec^'<Ri+iii< ^srf^iTan^T counsel for fhe petitioner and P.ei-, in fact, the Court below has of teniporary injunction whereby amoiint was staved. Takiag iuto ;uinstances existing in tlie present ^it warraiitms iaterference ia fhe ;ourt while exercisiag supervison" ^rticle 227 of the Constitution of deserves to be disinissed at tlie herebv disniissed. .-K-——----- Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge P.T.O.