IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 30TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 31313 of 2009(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ALI HASSAN, S/O.MUHAMMED MUSTHAFA RAWTHER, M.M.HOUSE, EDATHARA, KALANJOOR P.O., PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, POLICE HEADQUARTERS, KOLLAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION, KOLLAM. 3. SMT.ANITHA.S., POURNAMI, NO.83, PATTATHANAM EAST, JAWAHAR NAGAR, KOLLAM, NOW WORKING AS ASSISTANT MANAGER, D.R.D., S.B.T. HEAD OFFICE, POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER T.K.VIPINDAS R3 BY ADVS. SRI.MVS.NAMBOOTHIRY & SRI.A.N.RETNAKARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 31313 of 2009 :: 2 :: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 03.06.2006 IN I.A.NO.1151/2006 IN O.S.NO.184/2006 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 21.06.2006 IN I.A.NO.1151/2006 IN O.S.NO.184/2006FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 02.1.2009FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //true copy// P.S. To Judge SK/- KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.31313 of 2009 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. The petitioner approached this court seeking police protection against the 3rd respondent who is none other than his wife. As we found an element of settlement, we directed the parties to be present before us. We had extensive interactions with them through the conciliators and Advocates Mr.Ziraj Karolly and Smt.S.Chithra. It is unfortunate that the parties could not arrive at a settlement. 2. We find that various cases are pending between the parties before various courts. Earnestly hoping that the disputes could be settled, this court had stayed further proceedings in all those cases. Now that the settlement seems to be a distant possibility, it is only appropriate that the parties take their chance before the forums concerned. In that view of the matter, the order dated 12.11.2009 is recalled. 3. Learned counsel for the 3rd respondent submits that the 3rd respondent has no intention W.P.(C).No.31313 of 2009 :: 2 :: to interfere with the life and property of the petitioner. The above submission is recorded. The writ petition is hence disposed of making it clear that in the unlikely event of any such attempt on the part of the 3rd respondent or her henchmen, it will be open to the petitioner to approach respondents 1 and 2 in which case those respondents will render necessary protection to the petitioner. Sd/- (KURIAN JOSEPH) JUDGE Sd/- (C.T.RAVIKUMAR) JUDGE SK/- //true copy//