IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27494 of 2009 ARPAN KUMAR, Son of Rajendra Sah, resident of Village- Gudari Bazar, P.S. Samstipur, District-Samastipur...Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ...................................Opposite Party. ----------- 03. 09.12.2009. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Katihar Rail P.S. Case No. 27 of 2009 for offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 469 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Substance of allegation as set out in the First Information Report is that the informant alongwith some of his friends came to the Katihar Railway Station and purchased Railway Tickets for travelling to New Delhi. It is alleged that this petitioner alongwith others came and took the tickets from one of the friends of the informant and exchanged the same by forged Tickets. It is alleged that when the informant and his friends started searching for this petitioner he was found near the Ticket Counter. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the entire allegation as set out in the First Information Report is not correct and that he has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the F.I.R. has been instituted as a result of altercation that took place in the Ticket Window. It is submitted that the petitioner’s antecedent is clean and he has never been implicated in any criminal case and he is 2 in custody since 08.05.2009. Having regard to the facts and circumstances set forth, let petitioner Arpan Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Katihar Rail P.S. Case No. 27 of 2009 subject to the conditions that the petitioner would be attending the court below on each and every date fixed and the failure on his part to attend the court below on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the court below would confer liberty on the court below to initiate proceedings for cancellation of his bail bonds and for taking him into custody. U.K. (Jyoti Saran,J)