1 WP 6556/10 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6556 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. P.S. Dani for the petitioner. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 17TH AUGUST 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. The order impugned is interlocutory and requires no interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Even otherwise, I am satisfied that the order is just and proper. The application for appointment of a Court Commissioner was rejected on the ground that the Court Commissioner cannot be appointed to collect the evidence. On the facts and 2 WP 6556/10 circumstances of the case it appears that the object for appointment of the Court Commissioner is to collect the evidence which was rightly rejected. There is no merit in the writ petition which is hereby rejected. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)