/" ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ( C ) No.o)6CJ_3 Of 2011 PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS: 2. 3. 5. Nand Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Medi Lal Sahu, aged about 43 years, President, Janpad Panchayat Baloda Bazar, R/o Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (CG). Versus The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). y The Director, Panchayat, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). The CoIlector/Prescribed Authority, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). The Sub Divisional Officer, Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (CG). The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON CC) No. 2509 of2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Nand Kumar Sahu. VER8US The State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PEI1TION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITU'HON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble ShriSatish K.Asiuhotri, J. Present: 8hriAwadhTripathi,Advocatefor|thepetitiotwr^ Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer fbrthe State/respondent No. lto4. ORDERrORAL) (Passed on 10th day ofMay, 2011) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the CQllector, Raipur, by order dated 20.04.2011 (Aimexure P/8), stayed the proceedings of no-confldence motion against the petitioner, until farther orders on his application. Durmg tlie stay, a fresh proceeding of no-confidence motion has been imtiated against th^ petitioner on a subsequent application filed by the members of Janpad Panchayat, Balodabazar, which may not be done when tlie case is^ending consideration before the Collector and the same has not been decided fmally. Thus, fhe Collector may be directed to decide the issue ofno-confidence motion- after having considered the subsequent event also and pass appropriate order, in accordance with law, finally. Sht*i Thakur, leamed Panel Lsiwyer appearing for the State/respondent No. 1 to 4 subniits that indisputably, the order dated 20.04.2011 (Annexure P/8) is an interim order stayingthe proceedings until further orders. The Collector may be directed to v\^ y pass the final order on its own merits in aqcordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. In view oftheforegomg,interestofjustice would subsen^e ifthe Collector is directed to pass the order finally on fhe earlier application filed by the petitioner with regard to no-confidence motion against him, in accordance with law, within a period oftwo 'weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Satjsh K. Agnihotri Judge ^ Ainit ~<