1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.1468 OF 2006 Dr.Narendra Omprakash Bansal Petitioner vs. State of Maharashtra & anr. Respondents Dr.Virendra V. Tulzapurkar, Senior Counsel with Mr.R.D.Soni i/b.M/s.Ram & Co. for the petitioner. Mr.S.K. Talsania, Senior Counsel with Mr.A.Sayed, A.G.P. and Mr.L.M.Acharya for the respondents 1 to 3. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED : 21st August, 2006 P.C. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. For the order to be passed, it is not necessary to go into the controversy. A charge-sheet has already been served on the petitioner and the Enquiry Officer is appointed. On behalf of the respondents, the learned counsel makes a statement that enquiry will be completed on or before 31st December, 2006. We accept the statement made on behalf of the respondent-State. We further direct the petitioner to cooperate with the Enquiry Officer in completing the enquiry. 3. If the enquiry is not completed by 31st December, 2006, the suspension which is in force to stand 2 automatically revoked as on 1st January, 2007. Liberty to the parties to approach this Court. 4. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. ( F.I. REBELLO, J.) F.I. REBELLO, J.) F.I. REBELLO, J.) ( ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. ) ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. ) ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. )