THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 20618 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION: December 8, 2008 Ram Parkash …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: Mr. Amit Rawal, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by advertisement dated 29.11.2008/4.12.2008 (P-3 & P-4), which is a notice to the general public for auction of plots by the Town Improvement Trust, Hisar. 2. According to the petitioner his land was acquired in the year 1972 and award was announced on 24.2.1982 (P-2). It is the same land on which the Trust has developed plots, two of which are being subjected to sale by public auction. 3. There is neither any indication in the petition that rehabilitation scheme was framed as per the provisions of Section 26 C.W.P. No. 20618 of 2008 of the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 (for brevity, ‘the Act’) nor any material before us to conclude in that regard. The petitioner in the absence of such a rehabilitation scheme cannot claim any right for allotment of a plot by putting forward the plea that he is a displaced person. Moreover, had there been such a scheme then it is unlikely that only two plots would be reserved under the re-housing scheme. 4. We find no merit as there is no violation of any of rights of the petitioner. Even otherwise we find that acquisition proceedings came to an end on 24.2.1982 and the silence of the petitioner for such a longtime has remained un-explained. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and the same is dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (JORA SINGH) December 8, 2008 JUDGE Pkapoor 2