Crl.M.No.M-27225 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-27225 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:September 20, 2010 Rajuddin .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Sanjeev Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.48597 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-27225 of 2010 The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in complaint case No.385, dated 27.9.2002, under Sections 420, 406 IPC, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Ferozepur Jhirka, District Mewat. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully, including the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nuh, vide which application filed on behalf of the present petitioner for anticipatory bail was dismissed. The complaint pertains to the year 2002. Petitioner-accused was allowed bail in this case. However, he absented from the Court on 22.9.2009. Non-bailable warrants were issued against him to secure his presence. Later on he was declared proclaimed offender. Earlier as well he had filed application for anticipatory bail before this Court, i.e., Crl.M.No.M-30549 of 2009 and however, the same was got dismissed as withdrawn on 29.1.2010. This is second application for anticipatory bail on the same facts. Crl.M.No.M-27225 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Hence, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused. Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Rajuddin for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 20.9.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge