IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32041 of 2009 Chottu Kumar, S/o- Surendra Mahto, R/o- Village- Emlibigha, P.S.- Rahui, District- Nalanda :---- Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Bihar :-----Opposite Party ==== 2. 09.09.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This modification application has been filed to modify Order No. 03 dated 11.06.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10384 of 2009 whereunder prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail was allowed with direction to the trial court to verify the antecedent of the petitioner and if the same is clean he be released on bail. It is submitted that his antecedent is not clean as besides the present case he is accused in three other cases in which he has been released on bail and taking into account the said fact he be released on bail. I am not inclined to do so for the reason that the stolen articles were recovered from him on the date of registration of the case itself which fact is mentioned in the order dated 11.06.2009 and when such fact was pointed out to the learned counsel appearing in the case on 11.06.2009 then he had submitted that in view of the antecedent of the petitioner one chance may be allowed to him. Now this Court is being informed that the antecedent of the petitioner is also not clean as besides the present case he is accused in three other cases of similar nature. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to modify order no.3 dated 11.06.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10384 of 2009 and the modification application is dismissed. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)