IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9387 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision : February 10, 2010. Jiya Lal Sharma .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr.B.S.Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 30.5.2007 (Annexure P-10), whereby the benefit of pay fixation earlier granted to him while implementing the decision of this Court in CWP No.9715 of 1987 (Gurdial Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another) decided on 8.8.1988 and CWP No.9945 of 1989 (Nita Walia and others versus State of Punjab and others), decided on 1.3.1995, has been withdrawn and consequential recovery has been ordered against him. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involved in this case stands answered in C.W.P.No .9387 of 2007 (O&M) 2 favour of the petitioner by a decision of this Court dated 28.5.2009 review in CWP No.10472 of 2008 (Jasbir Singh versus State of Punjab and others). In this view of the matter, the writ petition is allowed; the impugned order dated 30.5.2007 (Annexure P-10) is hereby quashed and the respondents are directed to restore the benefits of pay fixation to the petitioner as were earlier granted to him and accordingly re-fix the retiral benefits and the consequential arrears to be paid to the petitioner, within a period of 4 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Dasti. 10-02-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE