IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.782 of 2009 Dilip Kumar Paswan Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 3 11.07.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the State stating therein that the order of the Court has been complied with by passing the necessary order as contained in Annexure-A to the show cause. Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that although order has been passed by the Collector but the same is not correct as the petitioner was selected for appointment on the post of Siksha Mitra during the proceedings of such appointment held on 31st March, 2006. Be that as it may, since the Collector has considered the representation of the petitioner as directed by this Court, this contempt application need not proceed further. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the order as contained in Annexure-A is not in accordance with law, petitioner proposes to assail the same in an appropriate proceeding. The application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)