3108appln1303.10.odt 1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1303 OF 2010 (Manik Anandrao Gangawane Vs. State of Maharashtra) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. R. M. Daga, Advocate for the applicant. Ms A. R. Taiwade, A. P. P. for the respondent-State. CORAM : A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATED : 31st August, 2010. Grant of anticipatory bail has been objected to on the ground that interrogation of the applicant is necessary for seizure of the bottle of poison and also for the information from where it was purchased. The interim anticipatory bail was granted prima-facie on the ground that when alleged victim was taken to the civil hospital, Washim, the reason of ailment was given as ‘consumption of poison’, and not ‘administration thereof’. To this contention, there appears no specific reply. In these circumstances, merely because it is felt necessary to seize bottle of poison and to obtain information from where it was purchased, benefit of anticipatory bail cannot be denied to the applicant. The anticipatory bail application as granted on 23/8/2010 is, therefore, confirmed subject to same conditions. Application is disposed of. JUDGE wwl