IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1654 of 2008 BIPIN RAUT Versus PINKI DEVI ----------- 2 26.09.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. This Court is rather astonished in the manner in which the impugned order has been passed. There is no discussion in the order. In fact, it appears that no evidence was taken and proceeding of 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been disposed of, allowing the interim maintenance. True it is that the Court had made effort on 12.8.2008 for reconciliation and the reconciliation proceedings did not bear the desired fruitful result. That however, would not mean that on that very day he would proceed to decide the matter pertaining to a maintenance case filed in the year, 2008 without giving adequate opportunity to the petitioner and/or at least regarding prima facie satisfaction both on the issue of relationship of man and wife as also the income of the parties. That being so, this Court would allow this Civil Revision application and set aside the impugned order with a direction to the Court below to pass a fresh order in accordance with law. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)