HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition N0. 3781 of 2003 Ajay Kumar Vidhani, son of late Heeralal Vidhani, aged 23 years, resident of Padam Nagar, Khandawa, M.P. PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur. 2. Shri Yogesh Mathur, the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Dhamtari. ggw' 3. Haresh Kumar Bakshani, son of Shri Gurnarnal Bakshani, aged 27 years. 4. Gurnamal Bakshani, son of Shri. Pohurnal Bakshani, aged 54 years. 5. Mukesh Bakshani, son of Shri Gurnarnal ‘Bakshani, aged 22 years. 6. Suresh Kuniar Bakshani, son of Shri Gurnama] Bakshani, aged 22 years. 7. Smt. KaVita Bakshani, Wife of Shri Gurnarnal Bakshani, aged 45 years. Respondent No. 3 to 7 all are resident of Vivekanand Nagar, Dharntari, C.G. (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) 1S3: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present : Shri B.P. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. \ Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 17‘“ day of October, 2008) 1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 9. By this petition, the petitioner questionsgrant of bail to respondent No. 3 to 7 on the ground that the circumstances were not changed after ejection, of the bail applications of the respondents No. 3 to 7. The\bail \ \V r \ . it em}? . M application of respondent No. 3 to 7, were initially dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhamtari. The petitioner has alternative statutory remedy for quashing or rejection of the bail under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘CrPC). Section 439 (2) of the CrPC makes provision of direction who has been released on bail under Chapter—XXXIII, may be arrested and committed into custody. Thus, this petition filed under . ,w/ Article 226 and 227, is not maintainable on the ground of availability of statutory forum. The petition is accordingly dismissed as not maintainable. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to appropriate forum as available to him under statutory provisions of law. No order as to costs. Sd/— l l pr,f . Satish K. Agnihntri I Judge , g ll i t is Sahu