SBCMA No.980/2008 Dhuka Ram Vs. Ram Lal & Ors. 1 SBCMA No.980/2008 Dhuka Ram Vs. Ram Lal & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : - 15.1.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.MC Bishnoi, for the appellant. Mr. RJ Punia, for the respondent nos.1 <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties. The appellant is aggrieved against the low award of the compensation by award dated 17th March, 2008 in MACT Case No.33/2005. According to learned counsel for the appellant the victim suffered 3% permanent disability and he had to pay Rs.15,000/- to the doctor, which is evident from the bill Ex.27. It is also submitted that he remained in hospital and in that situation, the tribunal has committed serious error in awarding low compensation of only Rs.17,200/-. I perused the reasons given by the tribunal and also the record and particularly, the receipt Ex.27. The receipt Ex.27 can be said to be no receipt for any purpose because of the plain and simple reason that the receipt given on the SBCMA No.980/2008 Dhuka Ram Vs. Ram Lal & Ors. 2 prescription slip on which the doctor writes the medicines for the patient and that fact is proved from the Ex.28. The Ex.27 also does not disclose what for said receipt has been given by the hospital. The claimant suffered injury in the year 2003 and produced the Medical Board's certificate of the year 2007. It is true that if permanent disability is there then the certificate may be issued by the medical board on any future date, but even if that disability certificate is considered then the claimant suffered only three injuries out of which one is the one fracture. The tribunal has awarded Rs.1000/- for each minor injuries and Rs.5,000/- for the fracture. I do not find that tribunal has committed any error of fact in awarding the compensation of Rs.17,200/- to the claimant in the peculiar facts of the case. In view of the above, there is no merit in this appeal and the same is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-