IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7219 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:20.05.2010 Sarup Singh ….Petitioner versus The President, District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Hisar. …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ------ Present: Mr. Rajesh Khandelwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate, for the respondent. ----- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? ----- K.Kannan, J (Oral) 1. The grievance of the petitioner was that an application for execution for enforcement of the award dated 21st March, 2002 passed by the District Consumer Forum was not being taken up and the petitioner had, therefore, sought for a direction that the execution petition pending before the District Forum, Hisar, should be decided within the stipulated period. 2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Insurance Company Mr. Talwar states that an amount of Rs.2,76,098/- has been delivered to the local counsel for the petitioner at Hisar and produces a copy of the receipt for the same. The petitioner still has a grievance that Civil Writ Petition No.7219 of 2010 (O&M) - 2 - the interest part of the award has not been properly calculated. In view of the satisfaction of the substantial portion of the claim, any dispute as regards the non-payment of interest will be a subject of an independent proceeding and there is no need for any further directions in view of the subsequent developments which has come about after the institution of the writ petition. A copy of the receipt issued by the counsel for the petitioner is taken on record and the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous reserving the liberty to the petitioner to take such action as may be necessary by an execution petition if he contends any amount is still due and payable to the petitioner. (K.KANNAN) 20.05.2010 JUDGE sanjeev