IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5663 of 2010 MANTU KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02/ 22/02/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner in a police case under Sections-302/34 of Indian Penal Code is that he was allegedly in the category of last seen when the impugned order of rejection refers to several witnesses, but no one is named in the F.I.R. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District and Sessions Judge IInd, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sessions Trial No.404 of 2009 arising out of Bikramganj P.S. Case No.146 of 2009. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)