IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2010 / 24TH ASHADHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 738 of 2010() ----------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.18385/2009 Dated 15/03/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONERS --------------------------------- 1. M.P. PAUL, AGED 44, S/O. PAULOSE, MANJOORAN HOUSE, KUDAPUZHA, EAST CHALAKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. SASIKALA, AGED 36, W/O. PAUL, MANJOORAN HOUSE, KUDAPUZHA, EAST CHALAKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.ABDUL RASHEED SRI.K.A.SHAMSUDEEN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 --------------------------------------------- 1. C.V. SAJAN, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. MANOJ, VILLAGE OFFICER, PADINJARE CHALAKKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA FOR R1 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- Contempt Case(C)No.738 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 15th DAY OF JULY, 2010 JUDGMENT Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. 2. The allegation raised by the petitioner is that in spite of the directions issued by this Court in Annexure-I order, a stop memo was issued by the 2nd respondent as per Annexure-III directing the petitioner to stop the work temporarily. 3. The learned Government Pleader on instructions submitted that the Revenue Divisional Officer, as per proceedings No.B2.9114/04 addressed to the learned Advocate General, has informed that necessary directions have been issued to the Village Officer, Padinjare Chalakudy for withdrawing the stop memo. It is therefore submitted that there is no impediment for the petitioner to continue with the activities. In that view of the matter, the Contempt of Court Case is closed. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. dsn