IN THE HONBLE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BBLASPUR PETmONER p> ->•' ^•^ ;«>• T ,,i!!'-.'''^ ?"' , - ^.^'" - '^.•y' .^8%.<" •>'';\^''^ '' ^y^ y RESPONDENT Cr. M. P. No. ° J L' /2010 Santosh Kumar Mishra , aged about 30 years, S/o Shiv Prasad Mishra, R/o Station Road, Kota, Tahsil and Police Station Kota, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS State ofChhattisgarii, through the police station Kota, Distt. Bilaspur. .ryy CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETmON UNDER SECTtON 482 OF CRD^ONAL PROEDURE CODE. P=a ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Sinnle Bench: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastaya^J. Criminal Misc. Petition N0.857/2010 Petjtioner Resoondent Petitioner Ramesh Kumar Tiwari Versus State of Chhattisgarh Criminal Misc. Petition N0.858/2010 Santosh Kumar Mishra Versus Respondent State of Chhattisgarh (Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure) Present: - Shri Ravindra Agrawal, counsel for the Petitioner. Shri Avinash K. Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 15th of November, 2010) Heard. This common order shall govern disposal of Cr.M.P.No.857 of 2010 and Cr.M.P.No.858 of 2010. Both the petitions were filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. by the respective petitioner aggrieved by order dated 14-10-2010 passed by the learned 9th Additional Sessions Judge, (F.T.C.), Bilaspur, by which, order dated 10-09-2010 rejecting petitioners' application for interim custody ofthe vehicle has beenconfirmed. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the petitioner in each of the petitions is the registered owner of the vehicle and in support of this, the petitioner has ptaced documents relating to the registration of the vehicle and also documents retating to purchase of the vehicle by taking loan from a Finance Company. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even though, no other person claimed the custody of the vehicte, the ai(l ye| pey jsuoitiiad aqi 'pej ui pue eiqissiuuad si jequinu sisseyo ayi ^o sBueyo 'pv SIO'MSA JOtoin ay} jo (e)zs uoRoeg ^o suoisiAOJd 94» japun esneoeq uoffeoiidde 941 .)o uoiioefsj IUBJJBM 0} se 9Aej6 os Buiaq ssousyo syi jo uoiieBeiie ou S! sjeyi pue sioiqeA sqi peuiieio ss|9 euou usyM A|jB|no!yed 'uoiieoiidde 941 loefej 0} siseq e speiu eq }ou pinoo ^|9S}! punoj6 piesejo^e 94} }ei|) paffliuqns jauosiiad aqi JQJ issunoo psujes") •jsquinu sisseiio 94} ui ssiouedsjosip uieyeo eq 01 sjeedde uoiieoiidde .sjsuoiijtsd p uoipsfsj jo^ uoseej uieiu eqi •Auediuoo aoueuy syi IUQJJ soueuy Buiuieiqo 01 6uite|9J siusuinoop 34} OS|G se sieoi^ivso uoitejtsiBsj 84} p9oe|d seq jsuoiiiisd 9i|} 'sioiqsA 941 p Apo}sno LUU3}UI )f38S 0} JSpJO Ul 9qi }B4i pe»oau9Jsi i! 'ynoo 9}e||edde JSMOI 34} Aq se ||8M se ynoo |ey} gqi Aq psssed J9pjo 94} io |esnjed e LUOJJ 'sioiyaA eij} jo Apoisno Luustui BUIUJIBIO Ijojsq aioiysA gqi p A}!}U9pt AJSA 0} pjeBaj I(}!M M0|sq ynoo 9i<t Ajsiies yy o» pajinbBj si J8uoi}i}8d ayi pue jsuoiiiied 941 jo jnoAej ui BIOIIISA 8i|l asesisj 01 jadojd aq }ou p|nom y. 'uoHeBBseAui jepun ||j}s si jaueiu 941 se »e4i psniuiqns jeyyn^ |esunoo 9}e}s p^uJe^^ 'sioiqsA 341 p jsqiunu sisseyo 941 ui Aouedejosjp si 9jai|} }ei|) punojB eyi uo p9}09fej ueeq seij j3uoit!»8d gqi p uoiieoiidde 84} }eqt pa|esA8J si 11 'pau6ndiu! jepjo 3t<} uioj^ ieyi psuiuiqns |asunoo sieig psujesi 'pueq jsqio 34} uo •|BUIp esjnoo 94} Buunp psjinbaj ueqM pue se sioiqsA syip uoipnpojd pue Apoisno sjes Q{Q ejnsue oisuoiijpuoo eteudojdde pssodiui SAeq p|noo MO|aq ynoo 9i|i pue epiysA ai(} p Apoisno luuaiui 0} peitjtuaseM 34 'MO|aq ijnoo ayi ejojeq luiq Aq psoeid leuaieLU 94} j0 siseq aq} uo yeiQ sijiuqns |esunoo psujee-] •e|oji<9A eqi psuireio seq auo ou ieqi panBje jaifyn^ 8H 'souayo ^o AIIAEJB 01 Buge|8J uoiiejapisuoo sss| i|onui uonejspisuoo jaijto Aue uo papsfsj useq sey sioiysA 34} p Apoisno ujuaiui jo.( uoReoitdde siiiajsqM sseo e iou si i! }EI<} stiuiqns jeuoiiged aqi joj |esunoo psujee") 'aioiqeA eqt 10 jeqLunu sisseqo 941 ui Aouedajosip si ejay} teyi punojB 34( uo A|u6 Apo}sno Luu3}ui jo^ uoi}e3!|dde ,sjauoii!}8d 8i|} petosfsj seq MO|sq ynoo psujes! 7. ^ /' -•^ (umane vehicle for extensive repairing and was about to apply for change of chassis number also. Taking into consideration the aforesaid submission that the petitioner is a registered owner of the vehicle and there is no one else, who has claimed the vehicle, rejection of petitioners' application for interim custody of the vehicle appears to be unjustified. Order passed by the learned Court betow is hereby set aside and the application for interim custody of the vehicle is allowed. Vehicle concerned shall be given in interim custody to each ofthe petitioners on the following conditions: 1. Each of the petitioner shatl furnish securrty of immovable property for a sum of Rs.5 Lakhs. 2. The petitioner shall not materially alter the icondition of the vehicle. The vehicle shall be kept in the safe custody. 3. The petitioner shall produce the vehicle as and when directed by the Investigating Agency or by the Court. It is made clear thatupon violation of aforesaid conditions, the order of interim custody shall be liable to be cancelled. In view of foregoing, both theaforestated criminal miscellaneous petitions are allowed to the extent indicated above. Sd/- ManindraMohan Shrivastava Judge