i } ^' f>- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: miASPUR DIVI8ION BBNCH: HON»BLB8HRI 8UNII* KUMAR 8INHA & HON'BLB 8HRI RAJB8HWAR LAL JHAMWAR. JJ. W.P. (Tl ?.R. No LT^ST /2009 Petitioners Respondents 1. Coimnissioner of Income TaXy Raipur 2. Asstt. Coxmxdssdoner oflncome Ts^c 1(1|, Raipiir Versus 1. The Inconie Tax AppeHate Tribuiial, Mumbai E- Branch, Mumbai 2. M/s. Chhattisgarh Electricity Company Ltd. (Now kiiow as M/s, Saxda Energy & Minerals Ltd. Siltara, Raipur 3. The Income-Tax Appellate Tribuiial, Nagpixr Bench, Nagpur Wrlt Petition u/A 226 ofthe <%>aistitution ofln^a Appearaaice:- None for the petitioners ia two rounds, Shri Amrito Das, counsel for respondexit No.2. None for respondents No. 1 & 3, ORAL-ORDBR (Passed on 03.12.2009) Per ButtU Kumar Siaha, J. Since fhee is no rcpresentatioxi on behalf of fhe petitioaers m trero rounds, we arc left with no oiher way except to dismiss &e petition for want of prosecution. Accordingly, W.P. (T) P.R. No. 5240/09 is dismissed for want of prosecution, Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/- R.L. Jhawar Judge Praveen