17.01.2022. Ct.No.29. AS. 3. C.R.R. 1124 of 2010 In the matter of : M/s. Anil Credit Commercial (P) Ltd. … Petitioner. Mr. Madhusudan Sur, ld. A.P.P., Mr. Dipankar Paramanick. …for the State. Learned Advocate on behalf of the State appears. Proper authority is requested to regularize the appointment of Mr. Madhusudan Sur and Mr. Dipankar Paramanick, learned Advocates. On careful perusal of the of the instant revisional application, I find that the petitioner has challenged the order passed in Criminal Revision No.141 of 2009 dated 12.1.2010 whereby the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, 9th Fast Track Court allowed the revisional application and order dated 27.8.2009 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 12th Court, Calcutta was set aside and direction was passed for issuing fresh summons upon the petitioner, Swapan Sadhan Bose. After careful perusal of the record, I find that in spite of specific direction by this Court on 12.4.2010, petitioner takes no steps by filing of affidavit of service. Now after careful perusal of the judgement itself passed in Criminal Revision No.141 of 2009, I do not find any irregularity and/or irregularity to interfere. Thus the revisional application stands dismissed. (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.) 2