IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.55916 of 2007 Deepak Kumar, son of Sri Vishwanath Gupta, Resident of Mohalla Khajpura, Jagdeo Path, P.S. Shastri Nagar, district Patna .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Rinku Gupta, d/o Bharat Lal, resident of Village Khajpura, Jagdeo Path, Patna – 14, At present residing at Sadar Bazar, Danapur, Distict Patna .. Opposite Parties **** /8/ 07.11.2008 On the last occasion when this matter was taken up, as suggested by the counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was to take opposite party no. 2, Rinku Gupta, to her matrimonial home on the auspicious date of ‘vijya dashmi’. 2. Today, when the matter is again taken up, the petitioner as well as opposite party no. 2 both are present. Now they are living together. Opposite party no. 2 has no complains. 3. Considering the fact that the dispute has been resolved and the petitioner as well as opposite party no. 2 are started living happily, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner, Deepak Kumar, is allowed. He is directed to 2 be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. 27 (C) of 2007 to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, Patna, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. 4. Since, the things are positive, the parties should withdraw criminal cases or matrimonial case filed against each other. Step should be taken, in this regard, as soon as possible. S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J. )