1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4325 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra ..APPLICANT VERSUS Prakash Popatrao Patil & ors. ..RESPONDENTS Mr S.V. Kurundkar, A.P.P. for the applicant; Mr R.B. Temak,Advocate holding for Mr P.R. Patil for respondents no.1 to 5 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4326 OF 2008 The State of Maharashtra ..APPLICANT VERSUS Rajendra Swarupchand Kothari ..respondent Mr S.V. Kurundkar, Advocate for the applicant; Mr Ajit Zarekar, Advocate holding for Mr R.N. Dhorde for respondent. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS, J. DATE : 27th November, 2009 PER COURT : Both these applications at the behest of the applicant - State take exception to the order of the Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, 2 Amalner, dated 4.10.2008 rendered in Criminal Bail Application Nos.101 of 2008 and 102 of 2008 issuing directions for the release of the respondents on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.161 of 2008 under section 420, 406, 408, 409 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at the Amalner police station, Amalner. 2. Learned Counsel for the respondents state that pursuant to the order of the Trial Court the respondents were released on bail and the State has now filed a charge-sheet against the present respondents on 9.3.2009. The respondents accordingly have obtained regular bail from the Court. In that light of the matter, therefore, according to me, the challenge to the order of the Trial Court directing the release of the respondents on anticipatory bail does not survive. Accordingly, these applications are rejected. ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) amj/criap4325.08