HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G.S. SINGHVI AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos. 11742, 11746, 11747, 11748, 11792, 11794, 12341, 12440, 12560, 12636, 12746, 16612, 20349, 20569, 21109, 21330 of 2005 **** Between Dr.S.Akhila Bharathi and others ….Petitioners And State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. By its Principal Secretary To the Government, Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. ORDER: Counsel for the petitioners: Mr.Noty Ram Mohan Rao Mr.A.Panduranga Rao Mr. K.Chinna Baba Mr. S.Ashok Anand Kumar Mr. M.Venkata Ramana Reddy Dr.P.B.Vijay Kumar, Mr.Marie Desai Mr. V.Narasimha Goud Mr. P.Raghava Reddy Mr.Y.Vivekananda Swamy Counsel for the respondents: Govt.Pleader for Medical, Health and Family Welfare Mr.D.V.Nagarjuna Babu Mr.S.Niranjan Reddy Govt.Pleader for S.W. 20th DECEMBER, 2005: Per G.S. Singhvi, CJ. In these petitions, the petitioners have prayed for grant of declaration that rules contained in G.O.Ms.No. 167, dated 26-05-2005 issued by Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department are unconstitutional and that the same cannot be acted upon for nullifying their admissions to the post-graduate courses. Learned counsel for the petitioners say that in view of order dated 21-04-2005 passed by the Full Bench in Writ Petition Nos. 4880 of 2005 and connected matters, and order dated 05-08-2005 passed by the Division Bench in Writ Petition Nos. 12341 of 2005 and connected matters, these writ petitions may be disposed of as infructuous at this stage, with liberty to his clients to seek revival of the cases, if any such contingency arises in future. Learned counsel for the respondents say that they do not have any objection if the prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioners is granted. In view of the above, writ petitions are disposed of as infructuous, with liberty to the petitioners to seek revival of the cases in terms of the prayers made by them. No costs. G.S. SINGHVI, CJ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J. 20th December, 2005. Msnr.