CWP No.811 of 2008. 26th May, 2008. Present: Mr. Rajnish Maniktala, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. Advocate General, for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner wants to approach the authorities concerned which had issued the notices. Two notices were issued to the petitioner one in the month of November, 2007 and subsequently on 17th April, 2008. However, the petitioner failed to file reply within the time bound period. We are of the considered opinion that the matter is sub judice with the Ayurvedic authorities. Accordingly, no interference is warranted as the writ petition is at the premature stage. Accordingly, it is dismissed as premature, so also the pending application. During the course of arguments, we found that certain Certificates were issued, which are part of the record indicating therein that the Board is registered with the Government, which Government has not been indicated. Further, it indicates “accepted by Judiciary”. While dealing with the matter, it would be open for the authorities concerned to make all the enquiries regarding existence of such Boards and how for they are genuine. If it is found that they are not genuine, proper advertisement be made in the State of Himachal Pradesh so as young people may not be led to wrong path because of the attractive advertisement. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. 26th May, 2008. (Rajiv Sharma), J. (tr)