-••*"' ^^/ OT) 0 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C( No.5S ^-=f-f20Q6 PETIT.IONER Mohan Sing-h Netam, aged about 42 .,fc...-'1^A years, S/o Shn Haricharan, ^.^•'/o^ .. R/° vluage Dond, Tahsil ^'?'^'^.--"""" Kasdol, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) p<s-v'' VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh,/^ Through Secretary, Forest Departnient, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur ^.0<l. ^A^l >£^^O ^ ~€Q'\Qrr 2. Union of India, through Secretary Porest Department, New DeJ-hi 3. Forest Range Officer,^' Baranwapara (Abbyaran], Distt. Raipur 4. Divisional forest Officer,»-' General Forest Division, Raipur *•,' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 *nw^iT stwi<t» 3:s? 'fww^, vr^\wi6, ^wvy. __ v^r- ^^-^/^^ 200 3f^f Wh (yiI^si^eT) sn^T^TR-fw (TOT 3TI^T s»"< (-' ,-v- 6«IIW(rf^(T3n^T 12.10.2006 Shri Parag Kotecha, counsel Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advoca on advance copy. Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, ci India on advance copy. Argumentsheard. Order dictated as fo!lows: QrtALORDER fl2.10.2006) SUNIL KUIWAR SINHA. J. By way of this writ petiti^n Constitution of India, the petition^r, directions to the State authorities constitution and election of the m4r with She said prayer, he has also pr4i schedules the date for election of tht should also be quashed. The subject matter of (his V^ the sutg'ect mattere of WP No.552|^ have been heard and dismissed by t(ii Learned counsel for the peti^ State/respondents does not dispute In view of the above, this Wri| stage on the grounds and reasdns s( in W.P. No.5524/2006 and W.P. No.; »i<ifa<n-f*iiHMTfftec^t<Ri^;i< ^arf^iTsniRT for the petitioner. :e for the State/respondenfe No,1,3 & 4 lunsel for respondent No.2/ Union of filed under Articte 226/227 of the r, has prayed for issuance of certain (o fonnulate the rules pertaining to the m^nbers of Van Suraksha Sanvti. Along r4yed that the memo Annexure P-3, which ofTice bearere of Van Suraksha SamiS, frit Petition is exactly identical to that of 5214/2006 and W.P. No.5525/2006, which this Court vide ordera dated 10.10.2006. ioner as well as learned counsel for the (his factual position. Petition is a!so dismissed at the motion (ated in orders dated^ 10.10.2006 passed ..^525/2006. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge J^^-t