IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 23921 of 2008 Between: Sri A. Vijaya Kumar Babu, S/o. Late Sri A. Veerabhadra Sarma, Osmania University, R/o. 12-13-633, Nagarjuna Nagar, Tarnaka, Hyderabad - 500 017. ..... PETITIONER AND The District Surveyor, Land Survey Department, Rang Reddy Collectorate, Saifabad, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondent in not considering the petitioner's Representation dt. 17-10-2008 made to the respondent to survey petitioner's residential open land bearing Plot No. 82, Admeasuring to an extent 437.5 sq.yds. or 365.79 sq.mts. in Survey No. 9 (Old No. 66/14), under Ward No. 3, Block No. 14, situated at Rock Town, Mansoorabad Village, Saroornagar Revenue Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, under LB Nagar Municipality, bounded by : North : Govt. School, South : 40 feet wide road, East : 30' wide road and West : Plot No. 81 i.e. schedule property and issue the certiﬁcate to the eﬀect that the demarcation of the boundaries of the schedule property are as per the schedule of the property as given in the registered sale deed No. 8635/2006 dt. 16-12-2006 registered at Sub-Registrar's oﬃce, Saroornagar, Hyderabad. Counsel for the Petitioner: MS.M.VENKATESWARI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.23921 of 2008 Order: The petitioner claims to be the absolute owner and possessor of plot bearing No.82 admeasuring 437.5 sq.yards or 365.79 sq.mts., in Survey No.9 (Old No.66/14), Ward No.3, Block No.14, situated at Rock Town, Mansoorabad Village, Saroornagar Revenue Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. He states that he made an application on 17.10.2008, along with necessary documents and by paying necessary fee, to the respondent to survey the plot in question. However, the grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent neither responded to the application nor surveyed the plot so far. Hence, the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondent, and at their request, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal, at the admission stage. As the application of the petitioner is pending consideration before the respondent, it would be appropriate to direct the respondent to consider the application, dated 17.10.2008, made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon expeditiously. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 04.11.2008 VGB