IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3756 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3756 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3756 OF 2007 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2007 The State of Maharashtra ] .. Applicant (Ori.Compltt.) Versus Mahadeo Yogiraj Kakade ] .. Respondent (Ori.Accu.No.1) Mrs. P.H. Kantharia, APP, for the applicant. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: 19TH DECEMBER, 2007 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. Perused the judgment. We find that there are several improvements and discrepancies in the ocular evidence and the Judge who has tried the case has rightly disbelieved the eye-witnesses.We also find that there was a scuffle and the Police has given Yadi to the accused persons to get examined from the doctors. However, no counter case appears to have been filed. We find that the view expressed by the trial Judge is a possible view. No interference is called for. Application is rejected. Sd/- Sd/- : 2 : [SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.]