IN THE HIGH COUR T OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38491 of 2008 1. Ram Ekbal Mishra. 2. Ram Das Mishra, both sons of late Keshwar Mishra resident of village Rani, P.S. Sikarha District-Bhojpur. …….petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar . ----------- 02. 21.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The order of cognizance dated 20.12.2007 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhojpur, Ara in G.R. 1955 of 2005 (Tr. No. 2385 of 2008) where by cognizance has been taken against the person under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323 and 364 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears that the report of the higher officer of the police is available on record who found the case false and gave a decision to proceed against the informant under section 182/211 of the Indian Penal Code. The Court found the evidence as recorded at paragraph 4, 6, 17, 18, and 19 disclosed facts which let the Court to take cognizance in this case. In other words the court differed with the findings recorded in the final report. The petitioner would have liberty to bring these facts to the attention of the court below at the stage of discharge. I find that there is no grounds to quash the order of cognizance in the facts aforesaid. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Devendra/ ( Sheema Ali Khan, J)