Criminal Misc. No.M-6040 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.M-6040 of 2011 Date of Decision: December 05, 2011 Bharat Bhushan and another ….Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI Present: Mr. Parshotam Lal Singla, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Munish Bansal, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab Mr. Onkar Rai, Advocate for respondent No.2. NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J (ORAL) On February 25, 2011 the following order was passed: “The present petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Bharat Bhushan and Chander Prakash for quashing of FIR No.243 dated 25.12.2010 registered under Sections 420/120-B, IPC at Police Station Phillaur, District Jalandhar, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2). Notice of motion to the respondents for 07.04.2011. Meanwhile, parties are directed to be present before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court on 09.03.2011 or any other date convenient to the Court for recording their statements with 1 Criminal Misc. No.M-6040 of 2011 regard to compromise. The Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court is directed to record the statements of both the parties to its satisfaction to know its genuineness that the statements are not the result of any pressure or coercion in any manner. The Illaqa Magistrate/Trial Court is also directed to send a report along with statements of the parties with regard to validity or otherwise of the compromise effected between the parties and also intimate whether any case is pending against either of the parties or not before the next date of hearing.” However, the parties could not appear before the learned trial Court in compliance of the above order and hence they were relegated to appear on 08.09.2011. In compliance of order dated 29.07.2011, passed by this Court, the report from learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Phillaur through learned District and Sessions Judge, Jalandhar has been received. According to which complainant Darshan Ram and the petitioners had appeared and admitted the factum of compromise. Learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel for respondent No.2 have admitted that the compromise was effected and the parties had appeared before the learned trial Court and made their respective statements. The offences under Sections 420 and 120-B, IPC allegedly committed by the petitioners are compoundable and the parties have amicably settled the dispute. In view of the above, FIR No.243 dated 25.12.2010 registered under Sections 420 and 120-B, IPC at Police Station Phillaur, District 2 Criminal Misc. No.M-6040 of 2011 Jalandhar and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. 05.12.2011 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) vcgarg JUDGE 3 Criminal Misc. No.M-6040 of 2011 4