IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 24526 of 2004 Between: Smt. E. Aruna, D/o. E. Geevaratnam, R/o. MIG-20, Phase-I, Pothireddypaly, X Roads, Mandal Sangareddy, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Manager, United India Insurance Companay Limited, Regd.Office H.No. 3-5-817, Bassheerbagh, Hyderabad-29. 2 The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Companay Limited, D.No. 8-129, Main Road, Sangareddy - 502 001. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, direct the respondents to fill up the post of Full time Sweeper respondents by the meritorious candidates who participated in the interview or selection process alone and consequently declare the action of the respondent in selecting the candidate who is not participated in the process of selection is illegal, arbitrary, and violation of principles of natural justice. For the Petitioner: VADDEMANI SRINIVAS, Advocate For the Respondents: MR.K.SRINIVASAMURTHY, Advocate The Court at the stage of admission made the following: ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the leaned counsel appearing for the respondents and with their consent the writ petition itself is disposed of at the stage of admission. The case of the petitioner is that pursuant to the order of this Court in W.P. No.13556 of 2004, dated 03-08-2004, the respondents issued call letter dated 20-8-2004 to her to attend the interview to the post of Full Time Sweeper in their Company. She claims to have topped the selection list. Her grievance is that the second respondent is going to issue appointment order to one Mr. Masood, who did not even attend the interview, nor was he a candidate sponsored by the Employment Exchange for selection, which is illegal and arbitrary. Hence, the writ petition. The petitioner has filed this writ petition merely on apprehension. The petitioner having attended the interview, without waiting for the results to be announced, has filed this writ petition contending that the respondents are proceeding to appoint a person who has not even attended the interview, which cannot be entertained, and more so when there is no cause of action for the petitioner to file the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. ______________ N.V. RAMANA, J Date: 29-12-2004 Svv To 1 The Manager, United India Insurance Companay Limited, Regd.Office H.No. 3-5-817, Bassheerbagh, Hyderabad-29. 2 The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Companay Limited, D.No. 8-129, Main Road, Sangareddy - 502 001. 3 Two C.D.copies.