1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) Nos.16242, 16248 AND 16249 of 2011 1 PALPANDI 2 PITCHAI 3 PITCHAIAMMAL 4 MOKKATHAI 5 PANDI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 TO 5 IN ALL THE PETITIONS Vs STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALLIKUDI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT IN ALL THE PETITIONS CR.NO.208 OF 2011 IN CRL.OP.16242/11 CR.NO.209 OF 2011 IN CRL.OP.16248/11 CR.NO.210 OF 2011 IN CRL.OP.16249/11 For Petitioner : M/S. S.BALAKARTHICK Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as accused and they were arrested by the respondent police on 22.11.2011 for the alleged commission of offence under Section 420 I.P.C in Crime Nos.208 to 210 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek bail. 2.Heard Mr.S.Balakarthick, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence and they have no previous case. He would further submit in his argument that they are ready to abide any conditions likely to be imposed by this Court for the secured presence of the petitioners. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the petitioners are having the modus operandi of cheated the innocent people by giving some currency note like Rs.500/- and Rs.1,000/- and seek for change from the shops and one person will give the currency but another person received and the person who is receiving https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 will not give completely, in such a way, they have committed the same offence in 3 places and they are in judicial custody from 22.11.2011. He would further submit that the investigation is offing and the recovery of money from the petitioners was only to the extent of Rs.1,500/- in Crime No.209 of 2011 and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners, stringent condition may be imposed. 5.Considering the submission made on both sides, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners on condition that the petitioners in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.16242 of 2011 shall deposit a sum of Rs.200/- (Rupees Two Hundred only) each to the credit of Crime No.208 of 2011 and the petitioners in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.16248 of 2011 shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One thousand only) each to the credit of Crime No.209 of 2011 and the petitioners in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.16249 of 2011 shall deposit a sum of Rs.100/- (Rupees one Hundred only) each to the credit of Crime No.210 of 2011 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, Madurai, and on receipt of the same, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, Madurai District, in each of the petition and on further condition that the petitioners should appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. sd/- 13/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALLIKUDI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI. 6. THE OFFICER IN-CHARGE, SEPCIAL PRISON FOR WOMEN, TIRUCHIRAPALLI. +1. CC to M/S. S.BALAKARTHICK Advocate SR.No.43523 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) Nos.16242, 16248 & 16249 of 2011 Date :13/12/2011 RJ/14.12.11 2p/8c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/