@1 ‘ 7 HIGH COURT OF CHEATTIsGARH AT BuAsi‘mR wh't. Petition No. 4115s 011992 r r ‘K.K.. Misma, Retiredtupper Division c1eyk, aged 'of about MOdhaparg, 67 years, ‘S/o RS. Narayan Kotwaii, Prasad Tahsil Mis’hra, axxd resident District Raipm' (Ni?) (New CG); ‘ ‘ VERSUS ’ PETtTlONgg ,RESPQNDENTS : 1. The Secretary State Valiabh‘Bhawan.BhopaHMP). of Madhya Pradesh, Tmough' Chiet ‘ ’ L 2. The Chief Executive 0%cer,’ Ianpad Panchayat K ’ Deobhog; Tahsil Garia’band District-Raipur, M.P._ '7 » (WRrr PETrrIoN UNDER 3. ARTICLE The Collector, 226 & 227 Raipur OF THE (MP). CONSTmmON - OF INDIA) 7 v (SB: Hon'bie Mr. 'Satish K. Agriihotri, J.) Present : Shri/Samee; Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Shti Amrito Das, Panel Lawyer fdr‘the State, i ORAL ORDER (eassed on 09‘“ day gf-May, 2008) ‘ 1.. With the cement of the patties; the niattef is taken up fat hearing , fttxally _ 2. This petition eertains to payment of retital benefits. 1 This Court, in the matter of W.P.’No{ 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. sg’arhan’d others)_axid other eormeeted matters, directed the Cemmittee to consider thematter of the retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The State of Chhgtti The Committee- was constituted by the Sate Government, pursuant to the order dated U2006‘ (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar . 19.06.2006 passed’m WP. No. 196 dated 13.03.2008 passed in‘ Vs. State Government and others) and order aijnath Moo. No. 105/2002; (State or Chhamsgam and others Vs. B Mandal and another). Thus,-this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and: order dated’31“ of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. K \ / 4642/2004 (Baijnath Manda! Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected matters, as submitted by the learned counsel appeaxing for the parties. _| This petition is disposed of in the same terms Le. proper opportunity petitioner, be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. 5._ Oiie extra copy of the papers of the petition shall for‘the petitioner to Shri Amrito Das, Panel learned counsel appealing Lawyer, today itsel£ for transferring the same to the committee. /// 3d]- SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI Judge \ ,/ the oEce of the be supplied by the Advocate General is directed to send the case’to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this orderi Therealter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concerned, within a thither period of 1'5 dayst The Committee shall consider and pass order in accordance with law, aher a&ording of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additionaldocuments, if necessary. The - entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if‘any, to the