{1} Cri. Application No.3966/2011 drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3966 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.120 OF 2011 Ananda Marotrao Shrirame APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT ....... Mr.H.V.Patil, Advocate for the applicant Mr.S.D.Kaldate, APP for respondent State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 13 th September 2011 PER COURT: 1. By this application the applicant has prayed for suspension of substantive sentence and his enlargement on bail during the pendency of the criminal revision application. 2. It appears that the applicant has deposited the fine amount in the trial court. Record further shows that the applicant was on bail through out during the pendency of the trial as well as {2} Cri. Application No.3966/2011 during the pendency of the criminal appeal. However, as the applicant did not surrender after dismissal of his appeal on 30.04.2011, a warrant of arrest was issued against him and on execution of the same the applicant came to be arrested on 07.09.2011 and since then he is in jail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant is a student and is prosecuting his studies at Hyderabad and hence could not surrender in time. There was no intention to avoid arrest. Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the fact that the applicant was on bail through out and is a student, the applicant be released on bail on the same terms and conditions on which he was released on bail by the trial court, however, on furnishing fresh surety and on executing fresh PR bonds. The bail to be furnished before the trial court. Application is allowed accordingly. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B11/criapln3966-11 {3} Cri. Application No.3966/2011 drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.120 OF 2011 Ananda Marotrao Shrirame APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT ....... Mr.H.V.Patil, Advocate for the applicant Mr.S.D.Kaldate, APP for respondent State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 13 th September 2011 PER COURT: 1. As record and proceedings has been received and learned counsel for the applicant wishes to go through the same, at his request, S.O. to 04.10.2011. Parties are put to notice that this revision is likely to be decided finally at the stage of admission. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B11/criapln3966-11