1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.18 OF 2009 IN TEST.SUIT NO.46 OF 2005 Vinod Ramchandra Shahadadpuri .. Plaintiff Versus Mrs.Ratna Kundandas Nihalani and Ors. .. Defendants Mr.D.A.Athawale for plaintiff CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 27th February 2009. P.C. . Heard Mr.Athavale for petitioner/plaintiff. None appears, although the acknowledgement shows that the chamber summons and affidavit in support have been duly received. Mr.Athavale seeks one week’s time to file affidavit proving service. Time granted. 2. Perused the chamber summons and affidavit 2 in support. For the reasons set out therein, amendment is permitted. Chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendments to be carried out within two weeks from today. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)