1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR ORDER S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 5998/2009 Ranjeet Singh vs. State of Rajasthan Dated : 21.08.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. Mahendra Shandilya, for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor for the State. This order governs the disposal of bail application filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. by Mr. Mahendra Shandilya Advocate on behalf of the applicant Ranjeet Singh pertaining to F.I.R. No. 272/2009 of police station Kotwali, Jhunjhunu in the offences under Sections 3, 4/6 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 1992. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has canvassed that he is being falsely implicated and is in no way connected with the commission of the offence of the instant case. He is innocent, hence, he may be granted indulgence of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail petition. 5. Having considered the submissions made at the bar and perused the relevant material available on record, it is not made out from the record as to whom the petitioner was telling answers of questions through mobile phone. The Investigating Officer present in the Court, is unable to tell this thing also that the 2 petitioner had the question paper with him. He has admitted before the Court that he or the Circle Inspector did not send any information to the RPSC that any case of using unfair means was detected and any person was nabbed for using the unfair means. The Investigating Officer has also not been able to tell as to what evidence has been collected so far against the petitioner but he admits that he wanted to arrest the petitioner. The callous approach of the police officer leads me to infer that it is fit case wherein the anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner, as there appears nothing on record against him. The bail petition is ordered to be allowed. 6. Therefore, the SHO/I.O. Of the Police Station Kotwali, Jhunjhunu is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Ranjeet Singh S/o. Sh. Norangram in FIR No. 272/2009 registered in the offences under Sections 3, 4/6 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 1992, he shall enlarge him on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.500/- with a surety bond in the like amount, to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i) He shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required: (ii)He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii)He shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. (iv)He will not commit any offence during the period of bail. (MAHESH BHAGWATI), J. Mak/- s-34