IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. L.P.A. No. 1832 of 2011 ( O&M ) DATE OF DECISION : 28.09.2011 Onkar Nath .... APPELLANT Versus State of Punjab and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate, for the appellant. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) This Letters Patent Appeal has been directed against the order dated September 14, 2011, passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby the writ petition (CWP No. 17178 of 2011) filed by the appellant challenging the orders dated 26.4.2011 (Annexure P-9) and 16.8.2011 (Annexure P-11), passed by the Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Mukerian (respondent No.4) and the Collector, Mukerian (respondent No.3), respectively, has been dismissed. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and have gone through the impugned order. The learned Single Judge has noticed the factual position and LPA No. 1832 of 2011 -2- thereafter, came to the conclusion that after the sale of 3 kanals 2 marlas of land by the appellant in favour of Anju Bakshi, Shashi Bakshi and Neelam Bakshi (respondents No.71 to 73), in the partition proceedings, a prayer was made by these three ladies that the land purchased by them be adjusted with the land of their husbands (respondents No.60 to 62), who were already party in the partition proceedings. The said prayer was allowed by the revenue authorities, without there being any change in the admitted mode of partition. It has been specifically observed that by doing so, no adverse effect has been made even to the mode of partition. Therefore, in view of this factual position, we do not find any ground to interfere in the impugned order. Dismissed. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE September 28, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) ndj JUDGE