$2?§$§.E§ §£E5§S$§ ’ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE : CG : BILASPUR Q WRIT PETITION NO (C) :xméu OF 2010 / Kanti Darshan Shaikshanjk and Computer Prashikshan Sanstha Registerd under Society Registration Act Reg no 4305/1997 Through : The President, Kanti Darshan Shaikshanik and Computer Prashikshan Sanstha Kosa Nagar, Dixit Colony, Bhilai Distt — Durg CG PETITIONER -VERSUS- .ry gr e.:"RESPONDENTS : 1. / The National Council for Teacher Education, Through : (A) KThe Secretary, The National Council for Teacher Education, Hans Bhawan, Wing-IL 1, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi (B) / The Secretary, Western Regional Committee Manas Bhawan, Shyamla Hills : Bhopal MI’ / 2. The State Council of Educational Research and Training Through : The Director, State Council of Educational Research and Training, Shankar Nagar : Raipur CG /’ 3. The State of Chhatu’sgarh Through : The Secretary to the Govt. of ' Chhattisgarh Education Department : DKS Bhavan : Raipur CG 7W Ww WRIT PETITIO OF THE CON N UNDER ARTICLE 226 STITUTION OF INDI‘L r“ ,rMaVN-TQ‘ ‘ r @ OURT OF CHHATISGARH AT BILASP WRIT PETITION (C) No. 41 of 20 antl arshan Saishanik and Comuter hlsan Sanstha VES RSU ‘ he N1 ‘n11 for Teacer ducatlon I "' Others RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITIO N RESPONDES NT : K D hk p Praskh n : T aton Couc h E & TW UTN OF IDIA > _ rse hr Anurag Dayal Shrlvastava Advocate 0 the pet1t10ne dvocate for the resondent NO p the uty Government Advocate for . By thisetitio, the etitioner seeks’ a direction to the respondent No. _ t cid/ass flnl rdr in Appal No. $9-594/2010 on or beore 30.08.2 earned counsel aearin for the etitioner sibmlts' at te pettione eing aggrieved b the order ‘of Withdrawal of reconiton ' date 2/17 05 2010 (Annexure P/6) referred an appeal under section 18 of th ata ci fo Teacher Educanon Act 1993 (or sort te Ac 993 ) which was ‘ nally heard on 21 7 2010 Thereafter no orer has bee assed till date though the last date of counselling and admisston woul come to n endgpon efoe0_$20 10’ a r3.0. 1 n normal course the resondent-authorities shou ote iete’ paS n orer a he earliest aiter hearing the matter However aVing regar t he facts Situation of the case it is exected that the apellate autority sha onSider the appeal of the etitioner and pass appropriate order so tat th etiione ay have benefit of the orer, before .. aeco‘nse‘a’a’i or ondets a With the aforesad observation and, direction, te W is disd . i h ritipetition ‘' pose of. No order asto costs . d/- i atishK Agnlhotr S i ge HIGH C T UR 82 10 PETITIONER .Pentf‘ S f r ‘ ' ‘ ' A p 1 1 pn p 1 o « deep a oe e f 010. . L ppg p ‘j h h ir, b y gi d V1 p e. Nionl Counl r f h ‘h t, 1 d n p d . I p ld nib drcdto s a d t t h d o t , p p h ll c p h e ptr m d 30082010. Lefndulpperng f respn hven» \ S " ' ud 3