1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 568 OF 2009 Smt. Seema Mahadu Dandekar ..... Applicant. V/s The State of Maharashtra ..... Respondent. ----- Mr. Niranjan Mundargi for the applicant. Mr. S.S. Pednekar APP for the State. ----- CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 6th March, 2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. Applicant has been arrested in connection with the offence punishable under sections 302, 201, 120(B), 109 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Prosecution case is that the applicant, alongwith her son and other accused, had conspired to commit murder of mother- in-law of the present applicant and three other persons who were residing with her. It is alleged that the property dispute was the motive behind the said offence. 2 Applicant's son and others committed murder of the said four persons. Prosecution case is that the applicant was one of the co-conspirators and, after four persons were murdered, bodies of three persons were tied together with wire which was supplied by the present applicant and these bodies were thrown in Septic Tank. The said wire was recovered at the instance of the present applicant. Three bodies were recovered at the instance of one of the co- accused whose statement was recorded under section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code. In view of the material which is on record, no case is made out for grant of bail. It is submitted that the applicant has a daughter of 7 to 8 years old and that there is no material on record to indicate that she was aware about the murder which was taken place. This submission also cannot be accepted since there is sufficient material on record to indicate that the applicant was one of the co-conspirators. 4. Application for bail is rejected. (V.M. KANADE, J.)