IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.822 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE 1. Jagdish Haldar 2. Smt. Sunita Haldar @ Suchitra Haldar R/o Adarsh Indra Bangali Colony, Rudrapur, P.S. Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar ..….Applicants (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: September 7, 2010 __________________________________________________________________ Arising out of FIR No.306 of 2010 U/Ss 498A, 304B of IPC, P.S. Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar ________________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate for the applicants and Mr. G.S. Sandhu, GA for the State. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicant no.1 is father-in-law and applicant no.2 is mother-in- law of the victim Smt. Pramila Haldar and they are living separately from Smt. Pramila and her husband. No specific role has been assigned to the applicants and they are not at all beneficiary with the demand of dowry. It is further submitted that the co-accused Shambu Haldar has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 27.7.2010 and the present applicants are also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. It is pleaded that the applicants are old persons, who are ailing with several old age diseases. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicants deserve bail at this stage. Let the applicants Jagdish Haldar and Smt. Sunita Haldar be released on bail on executing a personal bond by each one of them and on furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Udham Singh Nagar. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 7.9.2010 RG