IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.528 of 2008 JUGAL DUBEY @ JUGAL KISHORE DUBEY & ORS Versus MUSAMAT SONAMATI KUNWAR & ORS ----------- 2 29.07.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioners. Counsel for the petitioners prays for and is allowed him to make correction in paragraph Nos.2 and 4 of the Civil Revision application in which the date of registered deed of gift has been wrongly typed as 15.10.1962 which should have been 15.10.1968. On merits, however, this Court would not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order wherein the Court below has correctly, keeping in view the nature of amendment sought to be made in the written statement, has refused it by holding that it would virtually give rise to a new case contradictory to one which was pleaded by the defendants, petitioners in their original written statement. The ground now being sought to be canvassed by the counsel for the petitioner at the bar that the original defendant died and later on all the heirs came to know of certain documents infact, cannot be a ground for allowing such amendment. Accordingly, this application is wholly misconceived and is hereby dismissed. BCJ (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)