IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 4387 of 2007 Between: K. Chandrashekar S/o K. Laaxmaiah O./o Secretary Regional Transport Authority, Khairtabad, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 K.Manik Rao Bodhan, Nizamabad District. 2 G. Ananth Reddy Nizamabad District. 3 The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Principal Secretary, Transport Roads & buildings, Department Secrtarit, Hyderabad. 4 The Transport Commissioner, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari" calling for the records connected with order dt 9-2-2007 in O.A. No. 649 of 2007 on the file of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderbaad and quash the same as illegal and erroneous and pass such order or orders this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.SUMALINI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following : ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to quash the order of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short ‘Tribunal’) in O.A.No.649 of 2007 dated 09-02-2007. The Tribunal while admitting the O.A. suspended the proceedings of the fourth respondent dated 10-01-2007 as well as G.O.Ms.No.219 dated 10-11-2006. The Tribunal having considered the material on record thought it fit to suspend the proceedings of the fourth respondent dated 10-01-2007 as well as G.O.Ms.No.219 dated 10-11-2006. In the circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain this writ petition in as much as the impugned order is interlocutory in its nature and the Tribunal has not yet passed any final orders in O.A. Suffice it to direct the Tribunal to dispose of the O.A. as expeditiously as possible. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed at the admission stage. ________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED,J ____________________ C.V.RAMULU,J Dt:16-07-2008 usd