SB Crlmp No.1918/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CR.MISC.PETITION NO.1918/2010. Gopal Tank Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of order : 27/10/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ J. Shri Gajendra Vyas for petitioner. Shri Peeyush Kumar, Public Prosecutor for State. ****** This criminal misc.petition has been filed by petitioner Gopal Tank challenging the order dated 9/2/2010 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate (First Class) No.2, Ajmer whereby, application filed by the petitioner u/S.177 Cr.P.C. has been rejected as well as the order dated 1/7/2010 whereby, the revisional court upheld the aforesaid order and rejected the revision petition. Learned counsel for petitioner contended that even from the contents of the application and statement of the complainant, it is clear that the incident in regard to offence u/S.498A IPC had taken place at Vijay Nagar, native place of petitioner but the FIR was lodged at Ajmer, place of parents of the complainant. Learned counsel referring from the statement of the complainant argued that the complainant herself has stated that she was subjected to cruelty and demand of dowry at Vijay Nagar. Some part of the statement cannot be read in SB Crlmp No.1918/10. 2 isolation and statement has to be read in totality. Learned counsel in this regard referred to the contents of the complaint and the impugned-order to argue that the learned trial court and the revisional court have not correctly considered the averments made in the complaint and the statement of the complainant. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the petition. I have heard learned counsel for parties and perused the material on record. From the perusal of the orders impugned, I find that the learned revisional court found jurisdiction from contents of paras 16, 20 and 23 of the complaint to hold that the offences were of such nature which can be said to have partly occurred at Ajmer. In my considered view and considering provisions of Section 178 Cr.P.C., findings arrived by the courts therefore cannot be said to suffer from any infirmity. This criminal misc.petition is accordingly dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil SB Crlmp No.1918/10. 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B.CR.MISC.STAY APPLICATION NO.1815/2010. IN S.B. CR.MISC.PETITION NO.1918/2010. Gopal Tank Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of order : 27/10/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ J. Shri Gajendra Vyas for applicant-petitioner. Shri Peeyush Kumar, Public Prosecutor for State. ****** Consequent upon dismissal of the main petition, this criminal misc.stay application does not survive and the same is accordingly dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil