:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.9 OF 2002 TAX APPLICATION NO.9 OF 2002 TAX APPLICATION NO.9 OF 2002 Commissioner of Income Tax ..Applicant Vs. M/s.Ruia Stud & Agricultural ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Applicant. Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & A.V.NIRGUDE, A.V.NIRGUDE, A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 18TH JUNE, 2008 : 18TH JUNE, 2008 : 18TH JUNE, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The learned Counsel for both the parties concede that the question of law raised in the above Appeal is squarely covered against the Revenue in the case of Telster Telster Telster Advertising Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Advertising Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Advertising Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Income Income Tax, Bombay City-I, 116 ITR 610 Tax, Bombay City-I, 116 ITR 610 Tax, Bombay City-I, 116 ITR 610. In view thereof, the above Application stands dismissed. (A.V.NIRGUDE,J.) (A.V.NIRGUDE,J.) (A.V.NIRGUDE,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)