IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 23RD JANUARY 2009 / 3RD MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 2044 of 2009(R) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- HABEEB RAHIMAN, S/O.ALIKUTTY, AGED 34, MATHIL HOUSE, VELIMUKU PO., PADIKKAL, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.HARISH R. MENON SRI.K.T.SHYAMKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, KSEB, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, TIRUR MALAPPURAM. 2. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KSEB, THALAPPARA, TIRURANGADI TALUK, MALAPPURAM. BY SC SRI. P.P. THAJUDEEN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No. 2044 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 23rd day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner challenges Exts.P9 and P10. 2. Heard learned Standing Counsel also. Learned Standing Counsel would submit that Ext.P10 can be treated as a provisional bill and the petitioner can file objection against the same. In such circumstances, I record the submission of the learned Standing Counsel and the writ petition is disposed of as follows: If the petitioner files objection to Ext.P10 within one week from today, the objection will be considered by the second respondent and a decision will be taken after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within one month from the date of receipt of the objection. There will also be a direction to the second respondent to immediately restore the electric connection to the petitioner. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb