IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 5138 of 2008 Between: The Naval Armament Depot Civil Employees Co-op. Society Limited rep. by its Secretary Sri Puli Demudu, No. B 1152, NAD, Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 G. Ramachandra Rao S/o. Late Venkata Rao #36-93-267/B, Indiranagar, Kancharapalem, Visakhapatnam. 2 J. Appala Naidu S/o. Late Appala Swamy Peda Narava Post, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam. 3 S. Madhava Rao S/o. Late Pydithalli #26-22-18/1, Velampet, Visakhapatnam. 4 K. Satyanarayana S/o. Late Nookana #31-34-51, Neelama Cepachettu, Allipuram, Visakhapatnam. 5 The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative of Socities, Visakhapatnam. 6 The Cooperative Sub-Registrar, H3 and Inspecting Officer, N.A.D.C.E.C., Society Limited, Visakhapatnam. 7 The District Cooperative Audit Officer, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for entire records connected to order dt. 28.02.2006 in O.A.NO.101/02 RE No. as OA/44/04 on the file of Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Tribunal at Visakhapatnam, examine the same and set it aside after declaring the same as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative of the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964, rules framed there under and offends article 14 of Constitution of India and consequently dismiss the said appeal by upholding the surcharge order in Rc.No.244/2000-B, Dt. 30.06.2002 passed by the 5th respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No.5138 of 2008 ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. _______________ 08.07.2008 VGB