'J7 y; Vijay Bahadur Dubey, S/o Shri Ramkishan Tiwari, aged 36 years, Occupation Tracer in the office of Coliector (Land Revenue iranch) Kabirdhgm, District Kabirdham (C.G.) 3 State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department or Revenue, D.K.S.Bhavan, Mgntraiays, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Land Records ; Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur(c.G.) Collector, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham (C.G.) r6i \f^a/\ Shri Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Counsel forthe petitioner. Shri P. Bhaduri, Panel Lav.'yer for the Stafe/respondents. a'^u'lin IM Petitioner Vijay Bahadur Dubey, who is working on the post of Tracer, has filed this petition for correction in the final gradation list (Annexure P/5) published on 01.04.2008. Learned counsei for the petitioner submits that in t'ne said gradation list, the name of the petitioner has been shown at Sl.No.87 and his date ofappointment in Gove.rnment Service has been shov/n as 23.03.2005, whereas, the petitioner was appointed on 15.06.1990. He also submits thai since the date of <r appointment of the petitioner has wrongly been mentioned in the gradation list, his seniority has been fixed down below, which shouid be accordingly corrected and the seniority of the petitioner shouid be fixed as per his date of appointment i.e. 15.06.1990. He refersto Annexure P/4 showing the date of appointment of the petitioner. He further subrnits t'nat after publication of the flnal gradation list, the petitloner has made a. representatipn dated 15.09.2009 (Annexure P/6) raising all his grievances, but the same has not been dispossd of so far. Learned counsel for the State submits that firstly, tet the representation of the petitioner be decided and thereafter, if any grievance stii! exists, the petitloner may come to this.Court again. in view of the rivsi submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, 1 am of the opinion that firstiy, the authorities co'ncemed shouid decide the representation filed by the petitioner and if after their decision, any grievance sti!i exists, the petitioner may raise the sarne at the appropriate stage. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that if the petitioner files a. copy of the representation dated 15.09.2009 (Annexure P/6) along with the copy of this 'writ petition and the copy of this order within a period of 15 days from today, the representation dated 1 5.09.2009 shail bs disposed by respondent No.2 or by any otherauthority competent to a'ecide the same, within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of such documents. With the aforesaid obseryations/directlons, the writ petition shyna Sd/- SunU Kumar Sinha Judge 7 ^ t