IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.28512 of 2011 Sujit Kumar son of Baijnath Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar -------------------- 4/ 29.11.2011 This application has come under the heading “To Be Mentioned” at the instance of the Court. Due to inadvertence in the order dated 22.11.2011, the reasoning for bail given in another case was transposed in the present application. The order dated 22.11.2011 is modified to the extent that now it must read that this Court considering that there was material in the case diary to suggest that the son of the deceased and the independent witnesses have stated that after altercation with the petitioner the deceased herself consumed poison, the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No.54 of 2011, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any 2 manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The consideration in the order dated 22.11.2011 regarding grant of bail to the petitioner stands deleted. Let it be communicated to the Court concerned through FAX at the cost of the State. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)