THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.9633 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner questioning the order, dated 03.04.2009, passed by the first respondent-Vijayawada, Guntur, Tenali and Mangalagiri (V.G.T.M) Urban Development Authority, Vijayawada dismissing the appeal preferred by the petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that he is the absolute owner and possessor of the house plot of an extent of 200 square yards situated in R.S.No.121/6, Door Nos.1-132 and 1-133 of Ramavarapadu Village, Vijayawada Mandal, Krishna District. He submitted an application for permission to commence construction in the said plot and the second respondent –Vice Chairman, V.G.T.M Town Planning and Development Authority, Vijayawada accorded permission for construction of RCC Roof Ground and First Floor of residential building. In accordance with the said sanctioned plan, he started construction. While the matter stood thus, the second respondent issued notice dated 28.11.2008 calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why steps shall not be initiated to remove the unauthorised constructions made by him. Pursuant to the said show cause notice, he submitted an explanation. However, the second respondent issued notice dated 17.12.2008, under Section 42(1) of the A.P.Urban Development Act, 1975 (for short ‘the Act’) directing the petitioner to remove the constructions made by him contrary to the provisions of the Act within seven days from the date of receipt of the said order. Aggrieved by the same, he preferred an appeal before the first respondent. Pending the appeal, apprehending demolition of structure, he approached this Court and filed W.P.No.1698 of 2009 and this Court disposed of the said writ petition directing the first respondent to dispose of the appeal within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of that order and till such time directed the respondents not to demolish the structures. Pursuant to the said order, the first respondent dismissed the appeal on 02.04.2009 confirming the order of the second respondent dated 17.12.2008 and directing the petitioner to remove the unauthorised constructions made by him. Hence, this writ petition. On 06.08.2009, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is willing to remove the illegal constructions made by him and sought time to file an affidavit to that effect. Thereafter, the matter underwent several adjournments. On 09.09.2009, the petitioner filed an affidavit undertaking to remove the illegal constructions made by him and to construct the house strictly in accordance with sanctioned plan. Today, when the matter is taken up, the learned Standing Counsel for V.G.T.M Urban Development Authority submits that the petitioner has already removed the unauthorised constructions and therefore, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. Recording the above said submission, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. N.V.RAMANA, J Date: 13.11.2009 va