IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.Rev. (T) No. 36 of 2008 Decided on: 29.10.2010 Prem Nath Sood …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. B.N. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 7. None for respondents No. 8 to 10. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. B.N. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to the intervening developments. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 29, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?