A..J, .^-t- ^^>w^'\.^ ?•' ^tSftl"A<<l.-l''- SS.iSSSI^IIB isMtii^g^^B®^ •"—"—oS.S^i®6£ /' (^A-J^ ^^-^ '^' BBFORB HON'BLE COURTOF CHHATTISCrARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER 5SPONDEaTTS < WRIT PETITION No.^^Q^ /2006 Nitin Ramekar S/o Shri Dataraya Ramekar aged about 34 years R/o Plot No.277 Samta Colony, Raipi-ir (C.G.) VCT-SUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Genral Administration Department, Raipur. ,s^% 2. C.G. Board of Secondary Education ^ Raipur, through its secetary, Raipur (C.G.) WRITj'ETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227C;ONSTITION OF INDIA rtys' /"' r XI-HC-78 *II*IMI sh*ii«t> 3S3' •^iwi, ©TOwic,RiMKiy _^_ 0^.^7-G^/ ^[ 20(h^ 3(l^ifl Maqi (tj^3^E^) 3n^T%Tf^W traT3iA<is»iiti wareiTHfersn^T 14-6-2006 Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, counse Mr. G.K. Beriwal, Dsputy' ?N0.1. Mr. H.B. Agrawai, Senlor A' rsspondent No.2. Heard. 7'h^ c3ss of ths potstson^i' is examination conducted by r-£3ponc| Education, Raipur, on behaif of tht State of Chhatilsgarh for the post maximum marte ootaineci sy the s{ minimum marks of selected cand T'sximum niarks of selsctsd csndi' seiecied carsdidaies 'A'as 200. Th4 not called for the skili test by respon) Learnea counsei for respon) ths contention of the petitloner l^ respondent No.2 also it has been Is correct AccQfdtnalv. resDOP-denD corract numbsr of marks sscured bvl Mr. ^riWai, {$am^d Dcplity the State/respondent No.1 submittsf petitioner. As incorrect numberl therefore, {he petitioner wss not cai| obtained by the petitioner has beeji ?or ths ski tsst. <tii<iici'ifiTi Tpraf^fte^ <f^i«t< ^anl^PTSD^r ff^v -rh^ in.^^ji'i/stn/^f ivi U 1'w ii/i&tiuWt iWt • idvocate General for the Statw'respondent ^vocate with Mr. J.K. Gupta, Advocate, for that he ^ppssrcd ss OBC csndidsts in ths •.•A* MA ^ /*^^iaA*i>^A»«>n»i^D^^flM A'C C-AAAV. lJA.in t lej'ii i^V.£, v-nliicituoucitfj O^cii'U ui OcUuiiunfy ^ General Administration Department of the t>f 3teno-Typlst & AQ-iii. in the Steno test, •^iected candidates of OBC is 260, whereas jidates was 200. For the post of AG-!!!, ll^tas wss 254> whsrsss mlfiimum msrks of Retiisoner sscured 248, even thsn he v.'as ilientNo.1, . tient No.2 Mr. H.B. Asrawal submitted that correct and in return fiied on behalf of ^dmitted that the contsntion of the petitioner No-1 has slrsadv been Intimated abQutthe Ithe psiitionsr in ths examination. Adveosts <3en6ral app^gfing on y^usif of 3 that they ars not d'sputing the eiaim of the of marks were communicated to them, 'ed tor tns sKili tsst. t^ut now> corrsc? msrKs 1 comniunicated, they are ready to cal! him *II*ICTI awKb 75^ ^wivi^, wiS\wi<a, ftdwy bC>. 200^ w^\ ysi«h(Ii?l3'!"<dr) 3TI^T?iTf^tN; (raT3T^5Tst'»<ich CTdRKirf^Tsn^r In view of the above subrdi respondents, ths eetiiionsr's isetiiiorj to cgll thc petition$r for sRIII tsst for ijl and accordingiy, further orders be In view ofthis order, M,(W.)P.| Parties are entitSed for certifietj *i'IiT<-i41-( tii*<dTtffei<!) <Ri'wi< ^sif^rsn^T iss.'ons maae oy learned counssi for the is aii'o'A'ad and resporsde.it No.1 is directed seiection to the posf of SSeno-Typisf & AG- 18£5ea. ••J0.2Q47/2006 stands disposed of'. copy of this order. - - - -- -— L.C.Bhadoo Judge