IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.269 OF 1977 NO.269 OF 1977 NO.269 OF 1977 S.F. Mistry & Ors. ... Plaintiffs. V/s. B. I. Alladin & Ors. ... Defendants. Mr. B. M. Shroff i/by Mrs. M. P. Shroff for the plaintiffs Mrs.A. R. Lambey i/by M/s. Lambay & Co. for the defendant No.3. ALONG ALONG ALONG WITH WITH WITH SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 616 OF 1988 NO. 616 OF 1988 NO. 616 OF 1988 Miss Kulsum R. Mistry ... Plaintiff. V/s. Bilkis W/o. Iqbal Alladin & Ors. ... Defendants. Mrs.A.R. Lambay i/by Lambay & Co. for the plaintiff. Mr. B. M. Shroff i/by Mrs. M. P. Shroff for defendant No. 4, 5 & 6. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 18th April, 2007 : 18th April, 2007 : 18th April, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. By an order dated 16th April, 2007, as parties have arrived at a settlement, this Court has passed the following order:- ( 2 ) . "The parties have arrived at settlement and reflected in the consent terms dated 16th April, 2007. Plaintiff Nos. 1,2 and 3 in suit No. 269 of 1977 and defendant Nos. 4,5 and 6 in suit No. 616 of 1988 are present in the Court. Ms. Shahida, defendant No.3 in suit No. 269 of 1977 and defendant No.3 in 616 of 1988 are present in the Court. 2. The parties have signed the present consent terms. There is no dispute of the identification as well as identification of their signatures. The advocate for plaintiffs in suit No. 269 of 1977 and suit No. 616 of 1988 have also signed the consent terms. The advocate for defendant No.3 in suit No. 269 of 1977 has signed the consent terms. Advocate for defendant Nos. 4 to 6 in suit No. 616 of 1988 has also signed the consent terms. 3. By consent S.O.to 18/04/2007 at 3 O’Clock for necessary corrections and steps.The parties to give intimation to the receiver." ii) The newly appointed advocate for the plaintiff in suit No. 616 of 1988 has also signed the present consent term. There is no objection of any kind even to the power of attorney. The corrected consent term is taken on record and marked as "X". iii) The receiver is also present today. There is no objection, so far as the receiver is concerned, as the consent term itself has provided the steps needs to be taken by the receiver. ( 3 ) iv) The parties have resolved their dispute by the present consent term dated 16th April, 2004. v) Both the suits are disposed of accordingly, with liberty. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]