(1) RA. 26931.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 26931 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4490 OF 2010 Ravindra Shravan Vyas (Patil) and anr. .. Applicants VERSUS Rajesh Shivajirao Patil and ors. .. Respondents Mr. V.G. Sakolkar, Advocate for the Applicants Mr. V.D. Godbharle, APP for the respondent-State Mr. K.C. Sant, Advocate for the respondent nos. 1,2 and 5 ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1. By this Application, the applicants seek review of the order rendered by this Court in Writ Petition no. 4490 of 2010 and Civil Application no. 6866 of 2010. 2. Heard. 3. Contention of the learned Advocate for the applicants is that the elections of the educational trust are not being conducted in accordance with the approved constitution of the trust and bye-laws. (2) RA. 26931.2010 4. The Writ Petition came to be disposed of in terms of consent and thereby fresh elections were directed to be conducted within period of three months. 5. The elections are scheduled on 3rd October, 2010. The objections raised by the applicants were considered by the Returning Officer and even rejected by some of the members by speaking order dated 13.9.2010. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that said order is challenged by filing Writ Petition and the same is pending. So, if any relief is to be sought in the context of said order then the appropriate forum is the Writ Court and not the Review Court. Moreover, it is well settled that the election process cannot be stalled at the fag end of the same and that the Application will not be left without any remedy, because all the contentions can be raised while challenging the change report. 6. Consequently, the Review Application is dismissed inasmuch as the order is passed on consent and that the same has reached finality because of the (3) RA. 26931.2010 dismissal of S.L.P. by the Apex Court challenging the same order, and that the contentions raised in the Application are outside the scope of the Review Application. The contention of the applicants are kept open and allowed to be agitated in appropriate proceedings. Sd/- [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp