THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1787 OF 2011 ORDER: The petitioner preferred this revision against the order dated 17.02.2011 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Thungathurthy in Crl.M.P.No.97 of 2011 in Crime No.80 of 2010 of Aravapally Police Station, whereby the petitioner was also arrayed as an accused for the offences under Sections 354 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 {“IPC” for brevity}. The brief facts of the case are as follows. The respondent-Dubbaka Umadevi preferred a complaint against Kuntla Goverdhan Reddy and Kuntla Surender Reddy for commission of offences under Sections 354 and 506 IPC. The petitioner herein, being the Investigating Officer, completed the investigation and filed a report before the Court concerned referring the matter as ‘mistake of fact’. Aggrieved over the same, the respondent preferred a protest petition in Crl.M.P.No.97 of 2011 and requested the Court to take cognizance against Kuntla Goverdhan Reddy and Kuntla Surender Reddy. Learned Magistrate, after perusal of records, taken cognizance against the present petitioner also, who is the Investigating Officer in Crime No.80 of 2010. It seems that the learned Magistrate has erroneously taken cognizance against the petitioner herein when there is no allegation that the petitioner has committed any offence. Hence, the present cognizance taken against the petitioner erroneously is set aside and the Criminal Revision Case is, accordingly, disposed of. _______________ (RAJA ELANGO, J) 6th September 2011 RRB