CW 7417/07 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7417/07 Hemant Kumar Mahavar Versus UOI & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 03/07/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Braj Narain Sharma, for petitioner *** Instant petition has been filed with the grievance that despite petitioner being finally selected for the post of Head Constable [Ministerial] and placed in the order of merit, still he has not been considered for appointment against the vacancy reserved for SC category. Advertisement was issued by the respondents Ann.1 inviting applications for the post of Head Constable [Ministerial] along with other posts also. Petitioner applied for the post in question and after participating in the selection process with regard to reserved vacancy of SC category, his name also finds place in the final select list of qualifying candidates which is evident from Ann.5 issued from the office of respondents. Since he was not given appointment, a legal notice was served by petitioner - pursuant thereto, respondents have filed reply to legal notice dated 24th April, 2007 in which it has been clarified that petitioner secured 93 marks out of 200 and was placed in the order of merit at No.302 in reserved category, particularly, of SC where last candidate secured 101.50 marks and placed at No.254 in the order of merit, was considered for appointment. It was alleged by petitioner that those who are members of SC CW 7417/07 [2] category and were shown at Serial Nos.315, 324 & 344 were also considered for appointment. But, this fact has been seriously disputed by respondents. There is no averment made by petitioner that whether either of three to whom he alleged to be in the lower merit in SC category were at all given appointment and if appointed where they are presently posted. Nothing in this regard has been placed on record. As such, what has been stated so by the respondents in reply to notice ordinarily be disputed. So far as reference made of one another applicant Yogendra Singh is concerned, he was member of general category and secured 101.50 marks in comparison to petitioner and was considered for appointment in his respective category. There cannot be any lis which can be claimed by petitioner qua him. Since no contrary material came on record, this court does not find any substance in the writ petition, the same stands dismissed. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA7417CW2007 3-7.doc