IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2007 / 19TH ASWINA 1929 WP(C).No. 13158 of 2007(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SMT.PRIYADATHA LOHITHAN, PARAVOORKAZHIKAM, VAKKOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 8. BY ADV. SRI.B.S.SIVAJI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. PRESIDENT, VAKKOM MUKKALUVATTOM MILK PRODUCERS' CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.323(D) APCOS, PUTHENMUKKALUVATTOM, VAKOM P.O. 2. VAKKOM MUKKALUVATTOM MILK PRODUCERS' CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.T.323, (D) APCOS, PUTHENMUKKALUVATTOM, VAKKOM (P.O), REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT. 3. THE DIRECTOR, DIARY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DIARY DEVELOPMENT BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.ANILKUMAR GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.K.RAVIKRISHNAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.C.NO.13158/07 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DTD. 8-7-05 OF R1. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 12-3-07 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 12-3-07 SENT BY THE DIARY EXTENSION OFFICER TO THE S.I. OF POLICE. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 10-03-2007 OF R1. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 17-3-07 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE THIRD RESPONDENT. /True Copy/ PA to Judge. K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(c).No. 13158 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 11th day of October , 2007 JUDGMENT Petitioner challenges Ext.P4. Ext.P4 is an order of suspension. Petitioner seeks a direction to the third respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 in accordance with law within a time frame. A direction is also sought declaring that Ext.P4 is actuated by malafides and extraneous considerations and therefore illegal. Even though there is an interim order passed by this court to complete the enquiry within two months from 13/04/2007, it is the common case that the enquiry has not been completed. However I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition granting three more month's time to finalise the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the enquiry against the petitioner shall be completed and disciplinary proceedings finalised within a period of three months from today. (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) sv