IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 846 of 2008 Pankaj Bansal and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents ***** Present: Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana for the State. Mr.H.N. Khanduja, Advocate for respondents No. 5 to 12. ***** RANJIT SINGH J. Counsel for the petitioners draws my attention to order passed in Civil Writ Petition No. 20232 of 2009, which was disposed of on 26.07.2010 with the direction to the respondents to treat the writ petition as representation filed by the petitioner and to consider the case of the said petitioner for entitlement to promotion with effect from the date her juniors were promoted. The identical issue has been raised in the present writ petition. Here also, the stand taken on the behalf of the respondents is that the petitioners were not eligible by the cut off date. The petitioners have also been promoted during the pendency of this writ petition. The issue being identical, the present writ petition is also disposed of in terms of order passed in CWP No. 20232 of 2009. As a result thereof, this petition be treated as representation on behalf of the petitioners. The respondents would consider if the petitioners would be entitled to promotion with effect from the date their juniors Civil Writ Petition No. 846 of 2008 -2- were promoted. If required, the petitioners as well as the affected respondents may be afforded an opportunity of hearing. If any adverse order is passed, the petitioners shall be at liberty to take any proper proceeding against the same in accordance with law. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. August 17, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE