IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 3247 of 2006 Between: Palle. Venkat Ramulu, S/o.Late P.Ramanna R/o.H.No.1-3-79/11 Sunkulammamettur, New Bus Stand Road, Gadwal, Mahaboobnagar Ditrict. ..... PETITIONER AND The Superintending Engineer, Operation, APCPDCL., Mahaboobnagar District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the impugned order, Vide Memo No.SE/OP/MBNR/PO/Adm-U2/L-44/D.No.1288/05 dt.28.10.2005, as illegal and consequently, directing the respondent herein to reinstate the petitioner into his services as LDC along with all consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.RAVI PRAKASH Counsel for the Respondent: P.R.BALARAMI REDDY(SC FOR AP TRANSCO) The Court made the following : ORDER: The Writ Petition was listed ‘for hearing’ on 25.06.2008. Since there was no representation for the petitioner, it was directed to be listed today, ‘for dismissal’. There is no representation, even today also. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dated:02.07.2008 GJ