1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11759/2009 Samina Jakhar. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date : 5.4.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Vinod Choudhary, for the petitioner. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is working on the post of ANM in District Udaipur. According to her, in Hanumangarh area, their occurred two vacancies and, therefore, the petitioner if can be accommodated at Hanumangarh, then the petitioner's case may be considered by the respondents. So far as legal right is concerned, the petitioner's counsel frankly admitted that the petitioner has no legal right but her only prayer is that her case may be considered and if she can be accommodated in District Hanumangarh, then that relief can be granted by the respondents. In view of the above reason that there is no legal right available to the petitioner for any relief, no direction can be issued to the respondents. 2 Consequently, this writ petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner will be free to submit the representation to the respondents who will consider and decide the same in accordance with law only. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya