1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Appeal Against Order No. 65 of 2010 Chandrashekhar Vishwanath Mudliar ...VERSUS.. Ahilabadevi Shankarrao Sonare and others =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==- Mr. R.R.Shrivastava, Advocate for Appellant. C ORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATED : 18th MAY, 2010. Heard Mr. R.R.Shrivastava, learned Advocate for the appellant. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable after four weeks i.e. 15/6/2010. Civil Application (CAA) NO. 64/2010 Heard Mr. R.R.Shrivastava, learned Advocate for the applicant/appellant. The learned Advocate for the applicant has invited my attention the written notes of arguments, annexure-H, particularly paragraph 2 thereof (page 280 of the paper book) and also to the legal notice, particularly paragraph 3 thereof, which is placed at page 237 of the paper book. The learned Advocate submits that in view of these documents, the possession over the property is admitted and there is prima facie case for grant of temporary injunction. 2 In view of above, the application is allowed in term of prayer clause (2) of the application. JUDGE. Diwale