IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15304 of 2011 IRSHAD AHMAD @ MISTER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bajpatti P.S. Case No. 07 of 2004 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149,448, 323, 324,307,504 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. Subsequently the informant filed a petition in that also the informant did not name the petitioner. The petitioner’s name surfaced during investigation. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the charge sheet was submitted in 2008 whereas there was specific accusation against the F.I.R. named accused persons. Since the case was instituted in 2004 and the charge sheet was submitted in 2008, hence, this Court is restrained from interfering. However, on the basis of the submissions made above it is a fit case for 2 grant of regular bail. Let the learned court below pass appropriate order and try to dispose off the same preferably on the same day while considering the regular bail of the petitioner if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned C.J.M., Sitamarhi in connection with Bajpatti P.S. Case No. 07 of 2004 at the cost of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)