^^ '^^-^ ia«!f* IN THE HQN'BLE HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fSl N0. ^V /2010 PETITIONER RESPQNDENTS .^^y ^t^x ff\- ^•"^•^ ^^•-^<%. ...• » «.'au Balram Singh Sidar S/o. Late Dharam Singh Sidar, aged about : 33 years, R/o. Village : Sapnai, Post : Bhagora, Tahsil & District : Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS y 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, General , Administration Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, District : Raipur (C.G.). 2] The Collector, Raigarh, District : Raipur (C.G.). ^" 3] The Director, Panchayat & • Social Services, Directorate, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District : Raipur (C.G.). 4] Deputy Director, Panchayat Awam Samaj Kalyan, Raigarh, District : Raigarh ^l (C.G.). 5] Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Raigarh, District : Raigarh (C.G.). ^' 6] " Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Raigarh, District : Raigarh (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . I-HC—78 ^^ '<ii<iicf4, ©flly'Ko,[sidiyy, . W.f.(S?^^^S~/)^ siit^f'^'fym; 'TOTan^'gitiw 'TTiLi Sllt^ TT5R;' (Tpf^^q) ¥I3iw<ifta3nt?i qiwid''il-l tniRif 'Sfw ^•sifimsn^i SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohah Shrivastava, J With the oonsent of learned 22-07-2010 Shri P. K. Patel, oounsel for tl|ie petitioner. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Pan^l Lawyer for the State/respondents No.1 to 4 on advance copy. ^ounsel for the parties, the petition is heard finally. Grievance ofthe petitioner a^ set out in the petition is that in spite of directions issued by the Directot- vide his memo dated 08-10-2008 (Annexure P-5) as also by the Colte^tor vide his memo dated 26-09-2008 (Annexure P-4) to the Deputy Direj oompetent authority, is not considerirjg the petitioner's application for grant of compassionate appointment and the same. The petitioner has ateq tor, the Deputy Director, who is a date, no decision is being taken on submitted a representation dated 25-06-2010 (Annexure P-6) to the Dir^ctor and the Deputy Director, but the same has failed to evoke any respons^. In this view of the matter, as| the Deputy Director to take decision irf the Director has already instructed to the case of the petitioner, it would be appropriate to finally disposetl ofthe fretition directing the respondent No,4- Deputy Director to take appropriate cjecision on the t»titbner's application for grant of compassionate appointn|ent within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy o1j this order. In case, grievance of the petitioner still remains unredressed, t^e will be at liberty to take recouree to such remedy as may be available to h| m under the law. With the aforesaid direction, t|ie petition is finally disposed of. Sd/- ManindraMohanShrivastava Judge