;1?% j-<^t^|<)|<.!>4, (JiTny'ld, RK'iW^ MIMctT (bNlcb i.A.6c)-Ni7--^03/a6o7- "^200 an^r WR; C^f^9p) sf^sVt R'li* f' 3TI^?T ^T4f=ti '^•^ •renwHfersn^r M^.A.tfi.) 310^203 OF 3Q07 Ag?Ey,AN'T NON-ca-AIMANT No- l RESPONDEH'T'S 4, CITTt . TT.'~\"*.T;'nT T-I..m-TT-n-T~\TTT-T-n->-)L TT-^tT-1 A -k ^S: I1U1N .Dl^S OJ-iAJL U±liJ<JEll\UKAI1 f^ *» '^f^f>^9 '6. /.'^UU'I ynn yanjay K. Agrawal, 'bwfa'B-f wrafif.ls^t <fa«;K ^K ^N <wt^l 'nitea inaia Insurance irnncrh Rranr-h '0'"^ -—-.—.-.-. u-.-. Co, Ltd,, Pi.1 ra % /uiupie^. Mpinaafr •v^ ? ifont of State 3ank of idia, in Uurua-wara ytation Koad, nrar Oisitnr-t Dnrc? fc . f^-.i •*• 73? <^.-.">.-*^- ^—u.^.^^ —, -^,.^ Versus ihivbali, w/o Pancham Singh ^rms-. scfecl 3S \76flrs. HQusfi'-wif^ /u village Betar, iTaiisil Bciiielai'a, 'hana Bemetara, Distt, Durg ;ajkumar VeriTia, 's/o Late Shri 'Q.nchs.m. Sinsh Ven'ns... sged. about U years, SLUUCIIL l-'oiylcctiiiic ailege, 170 village Betar, 'l'ansil ^emets.rs. :uraj Venna, s/o Late ynn 'aiich&m Sinsh Vsrms. s.seci s-bout 6 years, student; Minor', Wali nrough mottier ynivbati, w/o 'sfc'bam Rins'h Vf*rm?i r/n villncr^ (elar, Talisil Beiiictara, Disll, Durg ;, G.) |om K.umar VeiTna, son ot Ihs-truhan L-3.1 Verrxi8.. R/o vxila^c iagicui, Post Keslara, Talisil Saja, |istt. Durg(C,G.) • 'CSHRA. J. ounsel tor ttie appellant. T3: .XI-He—78 sii^r ?BI R-fi.<* '3M ofl^^T so*iicft .."'7' / ' ~~v g^q- ^ti<<i<y><), ®Tfl«'[<o,Rt^iyy HINyll *t<|ch -—-----•--------"--"^ 200 sn^r'qaiR (ii<rf^?ff) ^dT^T -yfea ^nc^l Itas Beitietara, tbat towfertts Heard on ad.nussion. The appeUant Insurer awara datecl 3ln Uctober, '2V Acciclent Clauns 'lnbunal, II/' 2006 whereby a sum. of rate of 6% per annuin haj applicanon to tne clauaaats| Veliicles Act, 1988 (tbr short, j|ie 'l'ne only grouiia urgecl ui support ot Uus appeal is ciaimed tor coiapensanon raotor vetucle acculeut on 1H- me Diotorcvcle. KarUer Uie ciamiants unaer HecUon 10(3 d have preferred fhe applicati^n fi-unseu was ctnvuig tlie ve&icJ not be neia responsible tor 41 acciaent wl'ucn occurrea clue f'roia t&e perusal ot Uie| uie.awara nas been luacte leamea Clamis rnbunal. f'ronti Tribuiial, it is observed fhat Ibti ot me Act, uie claimaats ia the claim. petition and to n^c ^pitci'it^ TnlR^ ^.fe^ T^PE^ "^ 3fRPT 3IT^?T preten-ecl ttus appeal agam.st ttie yuf> passed by ttie AcldiUonal Motor ;i|ietara, Uistt. uurg ui Clarm Case No. ps. 1;72,000/- wiui interest at the Deen awaraecl n-om. Uie aate ot und.er yecUon lb3 - A ot Motor (lereiD.alter referred tp as tiie Act), Fby learaed counsel for the appeUaat unctisputedJy Uie claunants liaye deaUi ot P'ancliam. w&o aied ui a -U-^UU5 wiule lie fiim.seit was clnvulg appjicauon was preten-ed by ue tfthe Act but the claunaiits coula not towaras cteatti ot deceasea wlio |e aad tlie insurance company couia ^ny coiapensation, as a result ot me uegligence ofthe deceased himsetf. |unpugnect award, it is oDserved tliat Section 163-A of the Act bv fhe pei-usal offhe record offhe Clauns £|tterniuig Uie peuuon under yecuon ipioved an applica&on tor amenctiueat n^corporate tfaat_Uie petition is under tb under >XI-HG—78 SII^t 5!T R-li'h 9«TT3H^T s)i*<lch 3^'?STFn3.q', giTflu'is, RfOK-iy .^,ACc7-Mo. ^oSf^oo^ ^TOCT- vhWeh •-------••••--------"-g^200 3d^?r TOR; (-^fgp^) l^iiw ^ifTO sn^T -?r^ Section 163-A of the Act aiil 'l'nDuiial victe oraer clatetl 2/1 wnicli tias Deen Bicorporatea iyy4 sUpulates as uncler :- "163A. Special compensatlon on ^t Notwlfhstaadiug anytm^ oUier law tor t&e tune t] t&e torce ot law, ttie o| auttionzed. nisurer stialtl or pennanent clisableme] use ot niotor veiucle, Second Schedule, to fhe niav t>e. Exptanatwn. - Voi Vas "pennaneiit disaDUity" exteut as ui tlie Worlcm.t 1923). C^!) ln any claim tor com.] clamiant stiau not t>e rec cteatli or perruanent dis clami Jias been inade wa; or cletault ot Ue owner ol ot any otlier persons. d same nas been aUowecl by t&e 10-2006. Section 163-A of the Act in fhe Act with effect froin 14-11- pro|ns»ons •tiifd'il'i iw<'if ^fe'at <l»i«;ii i; aifim 3D^i as to paytnent of tructiired tormula basls- (1) Lg contauied m. Uus Act or ui any euig in lorce or uisU-ument Qswsig kvner ot Uie iQotor ve&icle or Uie be Uable to pay ui Uie case ol deatti tt ctue to accident ansiag out ot me loinpensation, as inclicatecl ui ttie l.egal Iieirs or ftie victim, as ftte case purposes of f&ls sub-section, jliau nave Uie saine nieaniag arid ^n's Coinpensation Act, 1923 (8 of~ jensaUon unaer sub-secUon (1), me iKured to plead or estabiisn mat me .^bleinent ta respect ol wnicit me aue to aay wrongtul act or neglect iHie vehicle or vehicles concenied or ;KI-He—78 3^T "i|l<<ttf>'i|, enflwis, Krtiyy +^.Q. CiO e^°- ^s/a-o^ ttlMpll *Nlcb ---";"-:---—-"-"---"--;"^p^ -SOfl'"^ st^^R; (,'^^vi) sii^H ?n (siiqi T^T STT^F sti*licft ..<?'• - ?«ii*3TtiEen <i;tf^5f -4- {3} XXX (Jpnsid.enng ttie provisii Kourt is-ot;,Uie opuuon Uiat |XXX XXX" pus ol yecnon 1&3-A ot Uie Act, Ulls t(ie grievaiice urged by the appeUants for ttie'purposes of fhis app^ 'I'liere is no lUegamy or intn-inil T'he appeal is disinissed «+>Nfd4l'f*iiH^tf^is^ <Eo(^R ^ <»i(d*i^tt^ii al is not available to ttie appeUants. "< -. iy ni t&e unputned award. tf at adinission stage. Sd/- \^ Dhirendra Mishra Judge