IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.1216 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: 25.05.2011 Sukhbeet Kaur and another ……Appellants Versus State Bank of India and others …...Respondents Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL. Present: Mr. Peeush Gagneja, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. S. S. Pathania, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Amandeep Chabra, Advocate for Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. L.N. MITTAL, J (ORAL) None is appearing for respondent No.3 inspite of service. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 have put in appearance through counsel. Counsel for respondent No.1-plaintiff as well as counsel for the appellants state that the matter has been compromised and amount as per compromise has since been deposited with respondent No.1-plaintiff-bank. Counsel for respondent No.1-plaintiff also states that ‘no due certificate’ has since been issued by the Bank. Accordingly as submitted by counsel for the appellants and respondent No.1, the instant second appeal is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (L. N. MITTAL) JUDGE 25.05.2011. A.kaundal