IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10609 of 2010 1. SMT.SAIRABANO 2. SMT. SANGITA SINGH ------------------- PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THRU. VIG. ----------- 6 13.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the Vigilance. Unemployed youngsters deceived by an attractive advertisement published in daily newspaper under the organization namely Women’s Rights Council to provide them job and its training, attracting there from 270 candidates joined depositing Rs. 19,998/- each. No job was provided, training if any was of inferior quality. An executive body was working and petitioners are shown President and Secretary of that Committee/Council. They were member of Bihar State Women’s Right Commission that position benefited this Council. The defence is that petitioners were not trustee of the Committee. They resigned from their post later. Bank account was being operated by one Dhananjay Giri but it is an admitted fact that advertisement was earlier to 2 registration of this Council. Bank account was not sufficient to show every transaction (earning and expense) and money was being transacted earlier to opening of the account in name of Dhanajay Giri. After commitment of crime if these petitioners resigned from their post, may not be taken to favour them. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioners is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)