IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1327 of 2007 Narendra Kumar Singh, Son of Late Nagina Singh, Resident of Town Mohalla –Dahiyahawar Chapra, P.O.+P.S.-Chapra,District-Saran ….(Deft.)..(Applt) ----------- Petitioner. Versus Rajpari Devi, Wife of Ram Nath Singh, daughter of late Deonandan Singh, Resident of Village- Babhanwalia,P.O.- Barja,P.S. Daudpur,District- Saran ---Plaintiff---- Respondent------ Opposite Party. ---------- 7. 10.11.2008 Heard Mr. Sanat Kumar Prasad for the petitioner. This is a restoration application to restore Second Appeal No. 176 of 2001 (Narendra Kumar Singh Vrs. Rajpari Devi) after extending the time for removal of defects. By order dated 3.10.2002, passed in Second Appeal No. 176 of 2001, as prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioner, six weeks final time was allowed by the learned Lawazima Board to remove the defects as per the stamp reporter. Not having been complied with, it was placed before the Bench and, as prayed for, four weeks’ time was allowed to remove the defects, vide order dated 9.12.2002 failing which the memo of appeal was to stand rejected without further reference to the Bench. The defect(s) not having been removed, the memo of appeal automatically stood rejected. This led to M.J.C. No. 113 of 2005. By order dated 26.10.2005, M.J.C. No. 113 of 2005 was allowed, and the time granted by the said order dated 9.12.2002(erroneously typed as 9.12.2000), was extended up to 28.10.2005. The same was not 2 complied with as a result of which the appeal stood dismissed leading to the present M.J.C. No. 1327 of 2007. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is not possible to countenance such negligent approach. The petitioner has found repeated opportunities to remove the defects in-adequate, burdening this Court with most unwanted matters, a matter which ought to have ended with the said order dated 3.10.2002, of the learned Lawazima Board. I do not find any justification to condone such an approach. This application is accordingly rejected. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar , J.)