)3 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Singte Bench: Hon'bie Shri Diiip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. Appellant Respond^nts M.A.CNo. 741 of 2007 Kumari Nalina Pande, aged about 8 (11) years, daughter of Ramakant Pandey, minor, through - Natural Guardian father - Ramakant Pandey, son of Rama Sanjeevan Pandey, aged about 27 (30) years, resident of Lalbag Aamaguda, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (CG) Versus 1. Rajpal son of Shri Lakhamu Bhawanj, aged about 40 (43) years, resident of Babusemra, P.S. Nagarnar, Tahsit Jagdalpur^ Distt. Bastar (CG) (Driver of the offending vehicle) 2. Devi Singh Baghel, son of Lokoo, resident of village Bhatagura - Turenar, Post Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (CG) (Owner of offending vehicle) 3. The Bajaj Alliance Insurance Company Limited, Kianetic House, Sector 1-D-53, Devendra Nagar, Raipur Distt. Raipur (CG) (Insurer of offending vehicle) Miscellaneous appeal under Section 173 of the MotorVehicle Acti 1988 Present: Shri Avinash K. Mishra, counsel for the appellant. Shri S.S. Rajput, counsel for the respondent No.3. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 07.11.2008) During the course of the arguments, a settlement was arrived at between the parties, whereunder the claimant agreed to receive and the respondent No.3/insurer agreed to pay to the claimant a sum of Rs.20,000/- in full and fina! satisfaction of claim, within a period of 30 days from today. =•?> t< 2^ (2) Learned counsel for the parties prayed that the appeal be disposed of on the above terms. (3) In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, it is ordered that the respondent No.3 shall, wifhin a period of 30 days from today, deposit in the Tribunal a sum of Rs.20,000/- as full and final satisfaction of the claim in this case. On such deposit being made, the Tribunal shall ensure compliance ofthe direction contained in para-19 sub-Clause (4) of the impugned award. (4) With the above direction, the appeal is disposed of. Sdl- DiUpRaosahebDeshnnAh Judge Priya