IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 2ND SEPTEMBER 2011 / 11TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23122 of 2011(M) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------ FEBIN RAPHI, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O.RAPHY P.T., ,PLASSERY HOUSE, KORATTY EAST P.O., THRISSUR-680 308. BY ADV. SRI.VIJAI MATHEWS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARUNAGAPPILLY POLICE STATION-690 518 2. GEETHA @ LEKSHMI, KOLLAMVILAKATHU HOUSE ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 101 GOVT. PLEADER SMT.C.M. CHARISMA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).23122/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1:- TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER CONTAINING THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE RECEIPT OF RS.37,000/-. EXT.P2:- TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL COVER AND THE LETTER CONTAINING PARTICULARS OF AMOUNTS RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE ami/ PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.23122 of 2011 ------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2011. J U D G M E N T PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. The petitioner has approached this Court complaining that at the instance of the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent S.I. of police is harassing him. Smt.C.M.Charisma learned Government Pleader, on the basis of instructions received pursuant to this Court's order dated 25.8.2011, submitted that the 2nd respondent filed a complaint against the petitioner before the 1st respondent. The complaint was to the effect that substantial amounts are due from the petitioner to the 2nd respondent and the petitioner is not paying the same. Based on that complaint, the police contacted the petitioner over telephone, for the purpose of ascertaining the facts. The police only advised the petitioner to discharge his debt. No action is thereafter he taken on the complaint. The police does not propose to 2 W.P.(C) No.23122 of 2011 intervene in the monetary dispute between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent. We record all the submissions of the learned Government Pleader. We make it clear that, if the attendance of the petitioner is required by the 1st respondent in connection with investigation into any crime or other enquiry, the 1st respondent shall issue notice to the petitioner under Section 160 of Cr.P.C. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE ami/