IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15416 of 2010 Date of Decision : August 30, 2010. Karamjit Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.G.S.Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner alleges that his wife Smt.Ritu Rani while pregnant was under the medical supervision and treatment of respondent Nos.7 to 9 and she lost her baby due to sheer negligence on their part. The petitioner is said to have made certain complaints in this regard but there being no tangible action that he has approached this Court. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the fact that the issue raised by the petitioner is of disputed nature and a writ Court cannot form any opinion on the alleged sheer negligence of the respondents without the support of clinching proof/evidence, I deem it appropriate to direct the Director General of Health Services, Government of Punjab, to look into the complaint dated 8.2.2010 C.W.P.No .15416 of 2010 2 (Annexure P-6) said to have been made by the petitioner and hold a fact finding enquiry, followed by further legal action against the defaulting Officers/officials, if any required, within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Disposed of. Dasti. August 30, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE