+ &£ I-HC--78 '3'ST •^Nicrf^, ^tft^FT^, [®i<vl|<H^< ^ilH^r ^HT^» "^ 200 3TT^T Tra^T ('^f^^T) 3Tr^T^T^TW ?TSTI ^TT^T^^lNr i^W^f^^TI^T fSinate Bench: Hon'ble Mr« Justtee DhirerKlra Mishra) W.P. ( Petitioner Respondcnts Sm^. Kmriialya Dcsvi/ W/o Chjtrc^en Jagne, age^l about 38 years, R/o. Sadcr Road, Nay|apara, Rcy'im, District Rdpur (C.©.) Versus 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Present: Mr. Amit Kumar Shcrma, Advocate f^ Mr. Shashcnik Thakur, Pcr^l Uwyer ^ 19.9.2008 By this petition, the pet\ 6.9.2008 passed in Revision P< Revision No.90/08 whereby the been allowed and the matter hdis Goi^t<n^li 'RT^^f ^f f^^ ^^K ^'3tRFr37T^T 3 No.5228/08 |5tate Transport Appellate Tribunal, phhattteg<rh, Raipur. >itQhlad Yadw, S/o l<rte Shri Dallu Ram Yadm. R/o VilJcge Kalle. District Rdpur tc.e.) phandiyoni Yadw, S/o Md^ian Lal Yackiv, |^/o ^atapor, Abhanpur, District Rdpur tC.6.) Nilmani Y<riav/ S/o late Shri Dallu R<mi j/adav, R/o Vitlcye S<u\py hkqar, Ikrapara, Raipur, District- Raipir (C.&.)] |Wadan Lal Dewongan, S/o Punitram pewangan, R/o Mana Basti, Raipir, jbistrict Raipur (C.6.) ^r +he petitioner. l|cr the Stote. |tioner has impugned the order dated ttition No.91/08, Appeal No.28/08 <& r^yjsion preferred by hteelnumi Yadav has been reinandted back to the Kegiy^ .^"v^. ,f,^s^ '%, •j'.€' '" '^ + ^ XI-HG—78 '3^T ^l^io^, s$t{|'M^i(o, f®i<rfl^^< ^s^^r^^w "^ 200 -3^¥T'^^ (<TyIl<sl<^) ^^^Tf^TW TI^TW^T^HT^ \ ^<!TW^ftiT 3:TT^T ^Lr Transport Authority, after concelinc favour of the petitioner, for fresh adjudication by the appliccnts for grant of stage ^arriage permit for -riie After perusal of the impugne^l Madanlal bewangan had also applied ^or same route and same timin9 at Regional Transporl- Authority withojjt respondent Madanlal ond only com Kaushilya Devi and the present |^ti1 petitioner herein. Considering 1+<< tribunal set aside the permit groB'j remitted the matter to the Regional to decide the applications together afl-er affording opporhinil In the considered opinion ofl jurisdictional error has been comi|iittred impugned order which warrants petition deserves to be dismissed/ Accordingly/ the (^tition is dj prefe^red CM^i^<fly1 ^TTR^ff "^* f^st <f^^K ^^tRFTW^r the State CorrioQe. Permit gronted in of the applications filed same route. order it is observed that respondent the stage carria^ i»rmitfor the earlier point of time, however, the considering the application of said idering the cpplications of or^ Smt. lioner, granted permit in favour of the aforesaid illegality, the appelfate ited in favour of the petitioner and Tran^ort Authority with a direction by all the three applications / of hearing. this Court, no jlle9ality, infirmity or by the tribunal in passin9 the iterference by this Court and the missed. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge X.