IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 30TH JANUARY 2007 / 10TH MAGHA 1928 W.P.(C).No. 3144 of 2007(Y) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- PRASANNA KUMARI, W/O.R.VASUDEVAN, AMBALATHARA PUTHEN VEEDU, NARAYAMUTTOM, PERUMKADAVILA, NEYYATTINKARA. BY ADV. SRI.G.SUDHEER RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, 695 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY(RECOVERY), K.S.H.B. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY, K.S.H.B. BALARAMAPURAM BRANCH, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK. 4. TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY) NEYYATTINKARA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ========================= W.P.(C). No.3144 Of 2007 ========================= Dated this the 30th January, 2007. J U D G M E N T Going by Ext.P8, the opportunity for the petitioner to avail One Time Settlement facility has run out. In view of Ext.P7 judgment, I do not find that the petitioner has any legally sustainable ground for entertaining writ petition. However, it appears that following Ext.P7 judgment, credit has been given for all remittances being made as per Ext.P5 order. It is also a requirement that the petitioner is given a statement of accounts regarding the entire transactions. Hence this writ petition is disposed of after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the 1st respondent, directing that the petitioner will be issued with statement of accounts touching the remittances already made, on condition that the petitioner remits an amount of Rs.50,000/- on or before 20th February, 2006. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. sj