CRLMB3571/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.3571/2010 Dhanna Ram and Jagdish Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order ::: 26.05.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Ali Mohd. Khan, Counsel for petitioners Shri Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor #### By the Court:- In view of the fact that previously eight cases have been registered against petitioner No.2 Jagdish Son of Mali Ram, I am not inclined to enlarge him on bail. His bail application is accordingly dismissed. Heard learned counsel for petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor on the bail application of petitioner No.1 Dhanna Ram Son of Balu Ram and perused the material made available to me during the arguments of the case. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application of Dhanna Ram. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, I deem it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner No.1, namely, Dhanna Ram Son of Balu Ram on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., in FIR No.117/2009, Police Station Manoharpur, District Jaipur (Rural) for offence under Sections 392 and 411, IPC, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. However, in case petitioner No.1 Dhanna Ram CRLMB3571/2010 // 2 // Son of Balu Ram is found indulged in repeating the similar offence at any point of time the prosecution will be at liberty to apply for cancellation of his bail before the court below itself. The bail application stands disposed of. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//