HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITON No.1036 OF 2011 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S. No.787 of 2005 in the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal against the 2nd respondent for the relief of specific performance of an agreement of sale. The trial of the suit is in progress. The 1st respondent filed I.A. No.2061 of 2007 under Rule - 10 of Order – I CPC with a prayer to implead him as 2nd defendant in the suit. He pleaded that the suit schedule property was purchased by him through sale deed, dated 13-03-2007, from the 1st respondent. The petitioner opposed the application. Through its order, dated 03-02-2011, the trial Court allowed the I.A. The same is challenged in this revision. 2. Heard Sri P. Veera Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. It was categorically stated by the 1st respondent that he purchased the suit schedule property through sale deed, dated 13-03-2007. It may be true that the sale took place two years after the suit was filed. However, it is in the interest of the petitioner that the subsequent purchaser is arrayed as a party in the suit. As a matter of fact, the petitioner should have taken steps to implead the 1st respondent as a defendant. This Court does not find any infirmity in the order under revision. 4. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J March 30, 2011 KTL