fSSSsl^ 3&is ns ^{!0(^- mTHEHIGHG^URTOPCHHATTIS&^ ^ITpETlTIONNO.'2fe^2-^2003/< ^PETmONER , : • Ramii Ram. Aee 44 vears. S/o >JangIee Ram, Retired IInd Grade Clerk, Kurja Under Ground Project, Hasdeo Area, At present residing at Village Kotasa P.0. Durgawati, P.S. Durgawati, Distt. Bhabhuwa (Bihar) VERSUS IKESPONDENTS 1. ^wv, at Ks^ N w: ^•y-: General Manager, Soufh East Coalfield Limited, Bila.spur ChiefPersorinel Manager, Hasdeo Area, North JUagaraMiand Koliary, South East Coalfield Limited, Surguja ' 3. : Depyty Chief Personnel Manager Kurja Sub-Area Koliary, Post Bijuri, .Distt. Shahdol SF. Personnel Manager, ' Kurja Sub-Area Koliary, Post Bij'uri, Distt. Shahdol Deputy Personnel Manager, Kurja Sub-Area Koliary, Post Bijuri, .: :; '. : ^;;, - Disff. .Shahdol WRITiPE^ITIC^TlNBg^a&R'I'ICLES 226^2271 OFTHE BONStIlimiffitN £>IiJfflia>iSiiiFi@RaiSSUANCE CW ANY WRrT OR ijC»IlE®RS,X>R;;^I:Bll]iraB@>]'BaiO'RAAENF^ ^S''BitDSMEN''M^lWH S ^^^^ • t '. • .•'.• 4. r^' ^^ .5. XI-HC-22 an%5tqa Kili?i Olfi<!t SRtCB t;5:E,~^: TV '3^Fl<4tWic(*l,';®^itwiS,'(° t CS< ..:'.,..:::.K^|-^T.,aE(StgR.,,. tffl;IWaB*lW~"'a^"T"""c::'°"'1' 200 'p <{y ^tt^^^Nl^llt ^f^tf ^fi-9-« 3 ^ Shri 6.K. Berjwal, counsel fi issued by the Oeputy Chief Persoij <*w(cf<8yywi!if"?ttiA <P«<;K ^3iPw<B|^g ^r the petitioner. By this writ petitfon fited t^der Articles 226/227 of the Constitutron of India, the petitioner seeks 1)0 challen9e the order dated 25—1-2001 nel Manager, Kurja sub or'ea aecepting the voluntary retjrement of the petiti^rier' which was seroed on the petitioner on 31*tjanuary 2001 mdmade effectwefronir'Pebruary 2001. TTie petitioner w«eworkin^ cs 6rode-IIclerk in Kurja sub area and the petitionerunder'pressureliaj|appliedforV.R.S.whichwasacceptedvide Annexures-P/1 and P/2. The petttjohei' moved cm appllcat'ion for V.R.S. under pressure (Bid comRe(ling circumsit|nces narrated in the foregoing pcrQgraphs asthe petitionet- Nice rwt given pitpmotion and moreover, the petitiQner was the President of M.P. Koycita Shr'a|nik Saigh, Kurjaand one Bonshilal W<K the member of rival labour tinion and Banshilal was residing on thel f ^io he had a grudgeagainst the petitioner'. /- . • ',. •• • |oor whereos the petitloner used to reside on the ground fl<w ond Banshilol i|fas in the bad habit of drinking and picking up quorrels with his ne,lghbouFan|d fellow workers. On intervention by the petitjoner, Bashilol used to abus the petitioner came true wheri petitioner andiryured him severel ^ the petitioner ond the appfehension of son of Baishilal, Oinesh attacked the ^. Dinedi Kumar was tried for- the offence under Section 307 of the I.P.C. a»|clconvicted by the 2" Additional Sessions Judge,Shahdolandsentencedfor|7years. ['»^f^ 'C •-X r' ^; /.'::iMi li;ll, .•iSttfliai,!*; l'\ X^HC-22 ^y"- ~-r A'<4 •*(tSldS»®At«is» fistKfg<i sa^t^r Vi-6* si^ S&+lt<fr ^t%ffi •WCU S(t»tt<t» "~^ 2M 'sa^&«H^it^tEsCT -i- *t<ifct-^ *tW^^T^^^^^K «6'UfaW^^feE The petitjoher- requested b^fore the authorities7Tor his tronsfer from Kur'ja but the request of the ^etitioner' was never heord, on the other hand those officer'sasked the pe|itioner to take voluntary retirement, therefore, the petitioner was comp^lled to move for V.R.S. The petitioner has no other altemative except to n^»vefor V.R.S.(Annexure-P/3) which was accepted vide Annexures-P/1 and P/ The petitioner moved for th I- with effect from 1st February 2001. recatling of the orcler of V.R.S. on Fanuary 2003. The request of the the cMthorities, therefore,a writ in the 'qiKBhing the impugnedorderaccepting 30-6-2002, 23-10-2002 and 6* petitioner hos not been accepted by nature of mondamus or certiorcn'i fo( the V.R.S.(<<nnexure&f/l <SP/2) beilsued. Ihwe heard the tearnedcoyi|sel for'the petitioner, The lewned counsel for th^ petitioner submitted that since the petitjoner" took the V.ft.S. under t|e compelling circuinstances wihjch has been mentioned in the writ petiti^ ought to havs accepted the reques^ made by him thpough Annexures-P/6. P/7 <& P/%, for reedling V.R.S. Annexl I do not find any force in tfl ^. ther-efore, the concemed Authority lires-P/landP/2. !e argument of the lewned counsel for the petitioner <as the V.R.S. was alp|ady accepted <md made effective from l-2-2001 and around about one .y4ar' and 5 months affer the orderof -voluntary retirement the petitioner the orders dated 25-01-2001 and 31101-2001. moved the representdtion for recalling ;|tl^^Rst<fe v' •S-TK-'S. ^n^ 'WfRl"^, S'WWtig,.!' 'q5f% tWtftt fhwaa %% feffis <^% ^< fr •^^: ^^CpS^ <9^? SE^ai^t^ ^i^tt ^^ -3 *l<fcA-t wteB '^'teat tEaR$a ^'atpw^^^^l' ,11-!«'^1 'll" <si Leorned courBel fop thejtefritioner Submitted that so far- not'etiral ?^X-r3~~ . ~ ' sd to^l-he petitioner by the S.6.C.L. and V.R.S. benefits have been Authorities. In the circumstances, in t|ie writ jur'isdiction no direction can be given. Ha«ever,•the petitioner is S.E.C.L. authorities within a peri lallowed to make a representation to the »d of 15 days and it is •ftir •theS.EG.L. outhorities if they find any St(>stance in the representation of the petitioher then they are <rt liberty and rules pennit so. With these observotions, th Consequently, M.(W.y. No. B'o pecall their order if the circumst<»ices stand disposedof. Parties greentitled for cer't|fied copy pf this or-der. writpetition is disposed of. 633/2003 <md I.A.NO. 8598/2003 also SdA L-C.Bbadoo Judge