IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 25TH MAGHA 1928 Con.Case(C).No. 160 of 2007(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.33375/2005 Dated 02/08/2006 .................... PETITIONER: ------------------- SUPRIYA MOHANDAS, D/O. MOHANDAS, HOUSE NO.48/1209, ANUGRAHAM, YUVAKULATARANG ROAD, ELAMAKKARA, KOCHI-682 026. BY ADV. SRI.K.BALACHANDRAN SRI.RAJESH NAIR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. JANCY JAMES, W/O. JAMES JOSEPH, VICE CHANCELLOR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. 2. M.R. UNNI, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Cont. Case (C) No. 160 of 2007 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 14th February, 2007. J U D G M E N T It is reported before me that as directed by my order dated 8-2- 2007, the result of the examinations already taken by the petitioner, pursuant to the interim orders of this Court or otherwise, has already been published. Of course, the petitioner has got a contention that she has not been issued with eligibility certificate and equivalency certificate. Although the petitioner may be entitled to the certificates as claimed by her, since there is no specific direction in the judgment to issue the same, I am of opinion that the petitioner has to take appropriate proceedings for getting the same. Therefore, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to initiate appropriate steps for obtaining those certificates, the contempt case is closed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.