Barve 16-1 2-2D98:- Shri Sunii Sahu, counsel for he petitioner. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Pa el Lawyer for the Statelrespondents. Learned counsel for the petit oner submits that the impugned transfer order of Annexure-Pl1 has aire dy been canceiled on 3-7-2006 vide Annexure-R/‘i and, therefore, this etition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is diemissed as having begorne infruc‘ruons.’ l Sd/- . Dhirendi‘a Mishra , Judge [rite W 61’227 of the Constitution of indie) (Writ Petition under Article 2 I-Hc-22 @\\L\ 0% mm W 200 ma ' L mm mm . m WWMW Wm€tw éEW m WIT “"T " 3‘0" Kam‘eep wkugm, VS/o Late Marcos Kujm, aged about 35 years, occupat§on service, working as Adhikari), poeted at Seen of Scientist (Vegyamk Adhikari), mime Mubiie Unit, Ambikapur, resident of Ambikapur, District Su‘rguja (CG) "‘ Versus RFSPONDENTS: 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Departmei‘it of Home AffaireLi‘x/iantraiay, D.K.$. Building, Haipur (CG) " t 2‘ The Director Generai of Paiice. Chhattisgarh, Police Headquarter, Raipur, Tahsii and District Raipur (CG) ~ - 3. The Addit onai Director Generai of Police, AIA.V. Police Headquarter, Raipur {CG) ‘ 4. The Inspector General of Police, Surguja Range, SurgujagDG)’