IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16003 of 2010 DEEPAK KUMAR SAH @ DEEPAK SAH, SON OF BAIJNATH SAH @ BAIDYANATH SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE/MOHALLA KANHAULI, MATH, POLICE STATION MITHANPURA, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. …..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Kumar No. I (Adv.) For the State : APP. ----------- 03/ 06.10.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State. Prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected earlier considering the allegation that he is husband of the deceased of the case and the case was registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. A report regarding stage of the case was called for and from the report it appears that the case is pending for appearance of the accused persons. The accused persons are non-else but the parents of the petitioner. Considering the nature of the case and repot of the trial court, I am not inclined to grant bail to the above named petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is again rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his 2 prayer for bail in the court below after appearance of all the accused persons. kksinha/- (Shyam kishore Sharma, J.)