bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1718 OF 2009 Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. Ghanshyamdas Goyal (HUF) ..Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant. Mr.K.Gopal a/w. Jitendra Singh for respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 16th NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard. Perused appeal. 2. Learned Counsel for the appellant fairly states that so far as question (A) is concerned, the very same question was involved in the appeal filed by the Revenue against the respondent Ghanshyamdas Goyal in his individual case, wherein, this Court was pleased to reject the said question holding it to be not a substantial question of law. The said order has been accepted by the Revenue. So far as question (B) & (C) are concerned, the Tribunal has dealt with the said questions in paragraph No.28 of its order with which no fault can be found. So far as question (D) is concerned, the said question does not arise from the impugned order, since the said issue was never argued before the Tribunal. Under these circumstances, the appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)