IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN TUESDAY, THE 24TH JULY 2007 / 2ND SRAVANA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 1587 of 2006(S) --------------------------------------------- ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.34626/2005 Dated 28/06/2006 .................... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS: ------------------------------------------ 1. VIJAYAKUMAR T.V., AGED 40 YERAS, S/O.VISWAMBHARAN, KANDATHIL HOUSE, POONTHOPPU WARD, ALAPPUZHA. 2. K.REMA, AGED 43 YEARS, (WIDOW), PARAMBIL HOUSE, PUNNAPRA P.O., ALAPPUZHA. 3. S.AJITH, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.P.SOMARAJ, THATTARUPARAMBIL HOUSE, THANDANKULANGARA WARD, AVALUKKUNNU P.O., ALAPPUZHA-6. 4. ASHAKUMARI M.S., AGED 42 YEARS, D/O.SARASAN V.P., ARATTUVAZHI P.O., ALAPPUZHA. 5. MADHU V.P., AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.PADMANABHAN, KIZHAKKEVELI, ARATTUVAZHI WARD, ALLEPPEY. 6. PRASAD T.S., AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.SUBRAMANIAN, THAIVELIKKAN, VATTAYAL WARD, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SMT.C.K.SHERIN SRI.L.RAJESH NARAYAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.3: --------------------------------------------------- SANTHOSH KUMAR, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY, ALAPPUZHA. BY STANDING COUNSEL MR.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------------------ Cont.Case (C)No.1587 of 2006 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 24th day of July, 2007 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. The complainant complains before this Court that the respondent has wilfully and deliberately violated the orders passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.34626 of 2005 dated 28th June, 2006. 2. This Court by the aforesaid order has issued the following directions. The same reads as under: “These writ petitions are disposed of making it clear that only after accommodating the workers in Ext.P1 list, there shall be any engagement even on casual basis of contingent workers in the contingent wing for sanitation work. Needless to say that in the event of any regular appointment, the employees in Ext.P1 ranked list will be given preference.” 3. Notice of this contempt petition was ordered to be issued and served on the respondent. Mr.M.K.Chandramohan Das has entered appearance. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant would submit that after the filing of this contempt petition, the respondent has complied with the orders and directions issued by this Court. 5. Placing on record the statement made by the learned counsel for the complainant, the contempt proceedings are dropped. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (K.T.SANKARAN) JUDGE vns