THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.24053 of 2010 Dated:21.10.2010 Between: Kambhampati Nirmala. ….Petitioner And The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Balanagar Division, Cyberabad, R.R.District, And others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.24053 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed the instant writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the second respondent in interfering with the civil disputes between herself and respondent Nos.3 and 4 with reference to land in survey No.179/part admeasuring Acs.2.37 guntas situated at Bachupalli Village of Qutbullapur Mandal in Ranga Reddy District, as illegal and arbitrary. On the last occasion when the matter was listed, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home sought time to get instructions. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home has produced before this Court, the written instructions from the second respondent. The same reads as under. “It is incorrect to say that, the official of the respondent visited the site and informed the husband of the petitioner to approach the police station along with all original documents for deciding the title and the husband of the petitioner approached the police station along with all documents. It is submitted that, this respondent did not call the husband of the petitioner to the police station at any point of time. It is submitted that, this respondent never asked the petitioner to settle the issue. It is submitted that the subject land of the petitioner does not come within the jurisdiction of this respondent-police station. It is submitted that this respondent never interfered with the personal life, liberty and property of the petitioner by way of calling her or her husband to the police station for settlement with the unofficial respondents 3 and 4 with regard to the above said property.” After hearing the Counsel and perusing the written instructions, this Court is of the considered opinion that respondent No.2 is not interfering with the civil disputes nor forcing the petitioner or her husband to settle the matter with respondent Nos.3 and 4. In view of the above, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition, and the same is accordingly closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ (N.V.RAMANA, J) 21.10.2010 vs