1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.07.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P(MD)No.7947 of 2011 K.Chinnasamy Naicker .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Senior Regional Manager, TASMAC Limited, Madurai. 3.The District Manager, TASMAC Limited, Tirunelveli District. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to pass an order on the proposal made by the 2nd respondent herein in his proceeding Na.Ka.No.5911/10-E dated 09.02.2011. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Ramachandran For 1st respondent : Mr.M.Govindan, Special Government Pleader For respondents 2 & 3 : Mr.K.Mahendran, Special Government Pleader ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to pass an order on the proposal made by the 2nd respondent herein in his proceeding in Na.Ka.No.5911/10-E, dated 09.02.2011. 2.Heard Mr.R.Ramachandran, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader, who took notice for the first respondent and Mr.K.Mahendran, learned Special Government Pleader, who took notice for the second and third respondents. 3.By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4.The petitioner claims to be the owner of the property bearing Door No.45/4, in Survey No.1326, Ward No.13, Tiruvengadam, Sankarankovil Taluk, Tirunelveli District. He has https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 given consent to run the TASMAC Shop No.10898 to the third respondent, who has recommended the same to the second respondent and the second respondent has in turn sent his communication Na.Ka.No.5911/10-E, dated 09.02.2011, to the District Collector requesting for approval to shift the shop to the property of the petitioner, as there is some difficult in the earlier location. Since the proposal sent by the second respondent is pending without any consideration, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition. The petitioner fairly states that there is an objection raised by one J.Britto Rajkumar, with regard to shifting the TASMAC shop in the property of the petitioner. 5.Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader states that the District Collector will consider all the objections and pass appropriate orders in this regard. 6.In view of the recommendation given by the second respondent at the behest of the third respondent, the first respondent/District Collector is directed to pass appropriate orders within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if not already disposed of. While doing so, the objections, if any, by the third party or the said J.Britto Rajkumar, the petitioner in W.P.No.4257 of 2011, shall also be considered on its own merits. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's claim. 7.With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(P&A) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Senior Regional Manager, TASMAC Limited, Madurai. 3.The District Manager, TASMAC Limited, Tirunelveli District +One cC to Mr.P.Subbaraj, Advocate, SR.No.23370 gcg rl/5c – 25.7.2011 W.P(MD)No.7947 of 2011 18.07.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/