HIQH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH,BILASPUR W.P, (81 No. 5505/2007 PETITIONERS Aziz Beg, S/o Late Noor Beg, Age about 65 years, Occupation Service, R/o Hu-apur, Virsawarker Nagar, HIG-544, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) yersus 1 State of Chhattisgarh, fbrough Priacipal Secretary P.W.D. Department Maufa-alaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Executive Engiaeer, P.W.D. Department, Vidbansabha Division, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Sub Divisional Officer, P.W.D. Department, Sub Division II, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITIONimpER,ART!CLE^226^0FTHE CONSTITUTION OP INDIA RESPONDEN'ra Appearaace: Shri Yogesh Paadey, Counsel for fhe petitioner. Sbri Ajay Dwivedi, Pauel Lawyer for fhe State. ORALORDER (21.09.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J Heard. Lriamed counsel for the petitioner submits that the facts and question of law involved iu the present writ petition are similar to that ofW.P. No.4135/2004 (M.A. Hakim -vs.- State of M.P. (Now C.G.) and ofhers), which has ah-eady been disposed offby order dated 28.8.2007. Agamst the order passed ia the said case, one S.L.P. was filed ia Supreme Court which was also disinissed. He furftier submits that thereafter, a review petition was filed, which was also dismissed. Thus the case is squarely covered by the said decision. SIiri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State subinits fhat it is not ia dispute that tbis matter is covered by fhe decision of M.A. Hakim's case (supra) aad this petition can c wsx W.P. (S) No.5505/2(»7 be disposed oS ia the terms of the order passed ia M.A. Hakim's case. In view of fhe above joiat stateiaent made at fhe bar, this petition is disposed off ia tenus of the order passed ia W.P. No.4135/2004 (M.A. Hakim -vs- State of M.P. (Now Chhattisgarh) aad others), which was decided on 28.8.2006. No order as to costs. ~—— Sd/- Sunil KumarSinha Judge