IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.660 of 2010 1. MAHESHWARI YADAV 2. Ram Chandra Yadav 3. Shukhdeo Yadav 4. Again Yadav @ Agam Lal Yadav 5. Hare Ram Yadav 6. Pappu Yadav All are residents of village-Nandlali, P.s. Bihra, Dist.Saharsa. Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 14.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The revision application is filed against the Judgment and order dated 20.01.2009 passed in Cr. Appeal No. 14 of 2002 by the A.D.J. (F.T.C.-II), Saharsa whereby and whereunder the Judgment and Order dated 09.04.2002 passed in G.R. Case No. 1392 of 1994 by the learned J.M., Ist Class, Saharsa. Sentence is stressed only referring a land dispute in between in between the parties. Quarrel, if any, was for digging of the land. Petitioners were also claiming the land even then they have been convicted for three months each for the offence under Sections 147, 323 and 448 of the I.P.C. They were entitled for relief under the Probation of Offenders Act either admonition or furnishing of probation bond. Now, they are in custody since 22.04.2010. If the period undergone by the petitioners is observed sufficient 2 towards sentence for all the sentences that will also solve the purpose to meet the ends of justice. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, the revision application is partly allowed on the point of sentence which is modified and minimized to the period undergone and the above named petitioners are directed to be released forthwith, if not wanted in any other case. Rest of the Judgment and order dated 20.01.2009 passed in Cr. Appeal No. 14 of 2002 by A.D.J. (F.T.C. No.II), Saharsa and the order dated 09.04.2002 passed in G.R. Case No. 1392 of 1994 passed by the J.M., Ist Class, Saharsa are hereby affirmed. Let the order be communicated to the trial court through F.A.X. at the cost of the petitioners. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)