IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No. 4146 of 2005 PRASHANT KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 03. 05.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner has prayed for quashing of District Order No. 931/2001, dated 08.10.2001, whereby the Superintendent of Police, Araria has directed to forfeit petitioner’s salary for 114 days and also ‘censured’ for the period of unauthorized absence. Appeal, preferred by the petitioner has also been rejected vide Order, contained in Memo No. 945/Sa.Pra, dated 11.08.2003. Petitioner’s prayer is quashing of both the orders. On perusal of the impugned orders, I find that, giving proper opportunity to the petitioner to show-cause and on consideration of documents, supplied by the petitioner in order to explain the period of over stay, the Respondents have passed the Order for forfeiting petitioner’s salary for 114 days. I do not find any illegality in the impugned orders. This application is dismissed. SKM (Mridula Mishra, J.) 2