IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 230 of 2010. Decided on: 3.3.2010 Narender Nath …. Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others. ….. Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr.Justice V.K.Ahuja, Judge Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr.A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr.R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.(Oral) The writ petition has been filed with the following prayer: i. That Annexure P-1 may be quashed and the respondents may be ordered to treat the said period on duty and they may be ordered not to treat the said period as earned leave period and all the benefits may be restored to the petitioner. It is seen that a legal notice annexure P-2 was served upon first respondent. Treating the same as a representation duly filed by the petitioner, the first respondent is directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law, within three months 2 from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition. In case the petitioner seeks opportunity for hearing, the same shall also be granted. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. Dasti copy. ( Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. March 3, 2010 (V.K.Ahuja) (trs/bss) Judge