CWP No. 5573 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: April 16, 2009 1. CWP No. 5573 of 2009 Vikash vs. State of Haryana and others 2. CWP No. 5586 of 2009 Pardeep Kumar vs. State of Haryana and others Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This order shall dispose of CWP Nos. 5573 of 2009 and 5586 of 2009 as common questions of law and fact are involved therein. The limited grievance made by the petitioner is that under Rule 12.16(19) of the Punjab Police Rules ( as applicable to Haryana) if any aspirant to the post of Constable has any grouse against the selection process he is permitted to make a representation to the DGP who would nominate a DIG to hear the complaint and take appropriate follow-up action. In the circumstances these writ petitions are disposed of with a CWP No. 5573 of 2009 direction to the respondent No.2 to pass an appropriate order on any representation which may have been filed before him by the petitioners within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE April 16, 2009 sunita