1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.04.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P.(MD)No. 1243 of 2011 & M.P.(MD) Nos. 1 and 2 of 2011 A.Shanmugam ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. 2. The Thasildar, Kulathur Taluk,Pudukkottai District. 3.Anjalai ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent in ref.ref.Na.Ka.1/6164/2009 dated 30.9.2009 and quash the same and consequently directing the second respondent herein to restore the petitioner name in patta and other revenue records and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. For Petitioner : Mr. M.Rajarajan For R1 & R2 : Mr. K.Balasubramanian Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian ORDER The petitioner, aggrieved against the order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukkottai-the first respondent herein, in cancelling the patta originally granted to him, has come forward with the Writ Petition to quash the said order. 2. The only grievance of the petitioner is that his patta has been cancelled by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukkottai, without giving notice to him. In fact, in the impugned order itself it has been clearly stated that if anybody is aggrieved, they can prefer an appeal to the District Revenue Officer. 3. The Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first and the second respondents filed the detailed counter and in his counter, he categorically stated that a civil suit is pending between the petitioner and the third respondent. The Additional Government Pleader further stated in his counter that the petitioner has preferred a revision petition against the order of the first respondent and that revision is also pending before the competent authority. Under such circumstances, the Writ Petition is not maintainable. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. As the revision is filed by the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as not maintainable without expressing any opinion of this Court on merits. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P.s are closed. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(LA) /TRUE COPY/ Assistant Registrar To 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. 2. The Thasildar, Kulathur Taluk,Pudukkottai District. +1cc to Mr.Ganapathisubramanian, Advocate SR.No.12914 +1cc to The Special Govt.Pleader SR.No.12886 W.P.(MD)No.1243 of2011 & M.P.(MD) Nos. 1 and 2 of 2011 ses PA/03.05.2011/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/