IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 463 of 2010. Balram Yadav aged about 35 years, S/O Late Sri Banwari Lal, R/O Village Arkediya Grant (Baniyawala), Post Office Prem Nagar, District Dehradun. … Petitioner. Vs. Bhagat Singh and nine others. …Respondents. Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Date April 02, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Interim Relief Application No. 2150 of 2010) Heard Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought the following relief:- I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus restraining the respondents not to create any third party interest or to maintain the status quo in respect of the land falling in Khatauni no. 151 of Khasra no. 400 measuring 0.0490 hect., Khasra no. 401 measuring 0.0080 hect. And Khasra no. 402 measuring 0.1974 hect. Total 0.2544 hect. Situated in Moza Dakpati, Pargana Kendariya Doon, Tehsil and District Dehradun during the pendency of the original suit no. 120 of 2010 Balram Yadav V/s Bhagat Singh and others as the petitioner has paid in advance Rs. 1,50,000/- to Mr. Madan Lal Sharma the power of attorney holder of respondent nos. 1 to 6. II. Issue any suitable writ, order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper on the basis of the facts and circumstances of the case. III. Award the cost of the petition to the petitioner. According to the petitioner, he has filed a suit for specific performance of contract bearing Original Suit No. 120 of 2010, Balram Yadav Vs. Bhagat Singh and others, in the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) Dehradun on 26-3-2010. Along with the suit, the petitioner has also filed an application (paper no. 6C2) under Order 39, 2 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. for grant of temporary injunction, which is also pending. The grievance of the petitioner is that the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Dehradun after hearing the petitioner-plaintiff on the temporary injunction application, instead of granting ex parte temporary injunction, issued notices to the defendant-opposite parties fixing 8-4-2010 for objection and disposal of application 6-C2. The prayer sought for in the present writ petition is in the nature of injunction against the respondents. The petitioner has not assailed the order dated 26-3-2010 passed by the trial court. The writ petition is devoid of merit and is liable to be dismissed outright at the admission stage. However, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the order dated 26-3-2010 of the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Dehradun thereby notices were issued to the opposite parties-defendants inviting objection against the application under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. and no ex parte injunction order was granted, the petitioner may assail the order before appropriate Court. With the above observation, the writ petition is dismissed summarily. All pending applications stand disposed of. Certified copy of this order be issued to the learned counsel for the petitioner today on payment of usual charges. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP 3