IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Writ Petition No. 367 of 2011 Date of Decision: February 25, 2011 Siraj-Ul-Haq ..... Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana and others. .....Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: Mr. Surinder Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Deswal, DAG, Haryana for respondent-State. ***** JORA SINGH, J (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus with a roving writ for the release of detenues as mentioned in para No.4 of the petition from the illegal custody of respondents No.4 to 6. It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the present petition has become infructuous as all the alleged detenues have since been released. Learned State counsel has filed reply and the same is taken on record. Reply filed by State is also to the same effect. In view of abovesaid reply and statement made above, the instant petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. February 25, 2011 (JORA SINGH) sham JUDGE