AB 1583/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI This is an application made under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail by the petitioners, namely, 1. Md. Abu Bakkar Siddique, 2. Md. Abu Taleb B huyan and 3. Md. Mokbul Hussain, in connection with Samaguri Police Station Case No. 231/2010, under Sections 366(A)/341/342/34 IPC. Perused the above application and materials on record including the stat ements of the alleged victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., which reveals s ufficient incriminating materials against the petitioner No. 1. Heard Mr. A Hai, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. BS Sinha, l earned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. It is submitted, on behalf of the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3, namely, Md. A bu Taleb Bhuyan and Md. Mokbul Hussain respectively, that this application for p re-arrest bail is not pressed on their behalf at this stage and as far as these two petitioners are concerned, this bail application may be disposed of as withd rawn with liberty granted to them to approach this Court with appropriate applic ation, in future, if so advised, seeking pre-arrest bail. Considering the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justice, the praye r is allowed. The application for pre-arrest bail made by the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3, namely, Md. Abu Taleb Bhuyan and Md. Mokbul Hussain respectively, shall a ccordingly stand withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioners to approach t his Court with appropriate application seeking pre-arrest bail. In view of the fact that the statements of the alleged victim, recorded under Se ction 164 Cr.P.C., reveals sufficient incriminating materials against the petiti oner No. 1, namely, Md. Abu Bakkar Siddique, he cannot be given the benefit of p re-arrest bail. In the result and for the foregoing reasons, the prayer for pre-arrest bail made by the petitioner No. 1, namely, Md. Abu Bakkar Siddique, stands rejected. With the above observations and directions, this bail application stands disposed of.