IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-26289 of 2008 Date of decision : 3.3.2009. ... Sachdeva Estate and another ................ Petitioners vs. Ishar Singh .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Vikram K. Chaudhari, Advocate for the petitioners. Sh. Deepak Nayar, Advocate for the respondent. ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that a revision petition against the impugned order of summoning is maintainable and the petitioners be given liberty to file the revision petition against the summoning order. At this stage, counsel for the respondent has stated at the Bar that he will not contest the point of limitation before the revisional Court. So, in these circumstances, the present petition stands disposed of with the observation that in case petitioners file a revision petition against the summoning order, that shall be decided on merits. The petitioners would be at liberty to raise all the points raised in the present petition before the revisional Court including the documents produced in this Court. ( K.C. Puri ) 3.3.2009. Judge chug