IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-31344 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:01.11.2011 Gajender alias Gajju . . .Petitioner Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Monisha Lamba, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sagar Deswal, AAG, Haryana. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This is a petition for pre-arrest bail in a case registered vide FIR No.305 dated 10.8.2011 under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 506 & 285 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) in which Section 307 was added later on, at Police Station Sadar Palwal, District Palwal. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had fired from an unlicensed gun on the complainant who luckily escaped. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a case of no injury and the petitioner has been falsely implicated whereas learned counsel for the State has submitted that after an enquiry from the DSP, it was found that petitioner has used the unlicensed gun by which he had fired three rounds and even the empty cartridge has been recovered from the spot. Photographs of the place were taken and the place where the shot had landed is also pin-pointed. Keeping in view the role attributed to the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant him anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) NOVEMBER 01, 2011 JUDGE Vivek