1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 3659/2009 Ballarpur Industries Ltd. and anr. ..vs.. State of Maharashtra ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Manohar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Badar, Advocate for respondent. CORAM: S. A. BOBDE AND Mrs. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ DATED : 1 st MARCH, 2011 Civil Application No. 360/2011 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By order dated 08.02.2010, this Court had permitted the petitioner to harvest Bamboos at the rate fixed in paragraph 19 of the order and also made provisions for securing difference between the price demanded by the respondent and the prices directed to be paid under the orders of this Court. Mr. Manohar, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the respondent-State has ceased to comply with this order on the ground that the order was restricted in its operation for a period of one year only. 3. We see no such limitation placed by this order. Even otherwise, we are of the view that since the order 2 was passed after hearing both the sides, it should continue until the Government undertakes an exercise for revision of the prices in accordance with the Maharashtra Supply of Forests-Produce by Government (Revision of Agreements) Act, 1982. 4. We accordingly direct the above order to continue till revision of rates by the Government under the aforesaid Act. Needless to say that the parties will be at liberty to make fresh application to this Court for security or otherwise as may be considered appropriate. The application stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE kahale