IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 03.02.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.34045 of 2006 1. A.JOSEPHAMALRAJ 2. V.BALUSAMY 3. N.EROLAPPAN ..PETITIONERS Vs 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CHENNAI-2. 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL AND THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, MADURAI CITY, MADURAI. ..RESPONDENTS Original Application No.9241 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench praying to set aside the order passed by the Director General of Police Chennai-2 in Memorandum No.154645/NGB-IV(3)/98 dated 29.9.98 or otherwise direct the respondents to include the petitioner's name in the appropriate place in the 'C' list drawn for head constables (local) fit for promotion to be promoted as Sub Inspector of police 1998 in appropriate place and to award all consequential benefits as per the feeder category seniority and to promote them as Sub Inspector of Police. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.B.Vijay, Government Advocate. O R D E R Original Application No.9241 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench praying to set aside the order passed by the Director General of Police Chennai-2 in Memorandum No.154645/NGB-IV(3)/98 dated 29.9.98 or otherwise direct the respondents to include the petitioner's name in the appropriate place in the 'C' list drawn for head constables (local) fit for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ promotion to be promoted as Sub Inspector of police 1998 in appropriate place and to award all consequential benefits as per the feeder category seniority and to promote them as Sub Inspector of Police. 2. The applicants/petitioners three in number working as Head Constables challenged the memorandum issued by the Director General Police whereby instructions were issued for convening the Range Promotion Board Test for drawal of the 'C' list of the Head Constables (local) fit for promotion as Sub Inspectors for the year 1994. This Memorandum was issued pursuant to the Rule 3 of the Special Rules for Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Service. The said rule is not under challenge. Hence, the petitioner is not entitled to challenge the memorandum. Further, there is no representation for the Petitioner. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar ts To 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CHENNAI-2. 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL AND THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, MADURAI CITY, MADURAI. W.P.No.34045 of 2006 PA (CO) GSK 12.02.2010. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/