^9£ysa^. PetitSor«er HIQH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR WritPetltion (S) No.3190of 2008 Rai Kumar Naidu, son of Shri KS. Naldu, ased about 47 years; resident of C-33 Bajaj Coiony, Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, Distriot Raipur (Chhatti^arh). Versys Resporsdente 1) State of Chhattjsgarh, through the Secretary, Co- operative Societtes Department, DX.S. Bha^^an, Mantralaya, G.E.-Road; Ralpur, Distrtot Raipur (Chhattisgarh). Additionai Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). Jolnt Registrar, Co-operatlve Societies, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). Reglstrar, Co-operative Societies, Chhattisgarh, Rajpur (Chhattjsgsrh). CWrit Petition under Artiole 226 ofthe Constltution of india) SB: Hon'bte IVIr. Satish K. Agnihotrl, J. Presenfc Snri HB. Agrawai, Sr Advocate with Shri Pankaj Agrawal, counseE for the petjtioner Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Go^/t. Advocate for the State. 2) 35 4) ORALORDER (Passed on 28th day of 4u^^ 2QQS} VVith consent of iearned counse! appearing for both the parties, the matter is heard flnaily. 2) Learned counsei appearjng for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been piaced under suspension by order dated 21-7-2005 (Annexure Ph}. Thereafter, departmentai enquiry was snstituted against him. Departmentai enquiry has been oompieted and the petrtioner has fiied reply to the second notlce after compietion of departmentai enquiry on 14-11-2007. Nothing has been happened tili date and the petitioner is stiii continuing under suspenslon. 3) it is trite-iaw that no direction can be issued to the Qovernment to pass the order or to revoke the suspension, under the oircumstances, when departmental enquir/ has been compieted and reply to the second notice has been submitted by the deiinquent empioyee. However, in the faots of the case, the authorities may be weii advlsed to !ook into the matter and pass appropriate order, as early as possibie. 4) in view of the above, the petition is disposed of, - Raju Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge