IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32864 of 2010 JAG NARAYAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 18.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. After recovery of de-composed dead body, First Information Report is lodged. Submission of the learned counsel for petitioner is that there is no material to conclude that dead body was of Sabha Yadav or having relation of this petitioner in disappearance of Sabha Yadav. No doubt dead body was of in de-composed state and none could identify its photograph, but it appeared in course of investigation that one Sabha Yadav disappeared from his house rather had left his house to search bribe groom for his daughter and disappeared. Further it has come that one night, he ate and drink with this petitioner who handed over him to co-accused Shashi Yadav and Bagla Nat that is differentiated on the point of its coming Jangi Yadav for this petitioner, if really petitioner is not Jangi Yadav no apprehension existing for his arrest, but there can be no exoneration due to change of the name. Being the dead body of Sabha Yadav, if can be doubted then also he is 2 disappeared and complicity of this petitioner has appeared and investigation is in progress at the moment. Accordingly, the prayer of petitioner for anticipatory bail stands rejected. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)