...tSSS SS1!^ c^ vtfT»?. mfBESSSiS COURT 0¥CHHATTXSC-AKH AT 4:£^1-,1010 FE¥EaOME;R : ' Nitian Kumar, S/o Nandji Yadav, Aged about 15 years Student ofClass 10th represented through his natural guardian father, Nandji Yadav S/o Late Shri Baban Yadav, aged about 43 years, R/o D-24 Staff quarter, Guru Ghasidas University, Koni, District Bilaspur, (C.G.) VERS'OS , 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary Revenue Department D.K.S. Bhawan, RaipurC.G. ^ 2. Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) -3. Sub-Divisional Officer, Bilaspur District BUaspur, (C.G.) 'sisrr ssrn'io'K UNDER Miaci.E 226/227 OF THE cos'STiTm'ioN.QF FOT_djrection to is.sue castCertificate to the peti.tioner. KAKrECTOARS OE* TfflS PISnSIOK^ As per cause title. 2. EAIgKClffiASS OF TSBB RBSPOKBBiSTg As per cause dtle. 1 /... I^f~ !m> SSiSie^j.fl' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (CtNo. 6692 OF 2018 Petjtioner Nitian Kumar Versus Respondents State of Chhattlsgarh & Others. WRIT RETITiON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONST1TUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'bte Mr.Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Rajesh Kumar Jain, Advasate forthepetitioner. Shri A.S.techhawaha, Dy Advocate General for the State. Ms. Saumya Chaurasia Modi, S.D.O.(R), Bilaspur, present. ORDER (ORAU (Passedon 22nd day of November, 2010) 1. Heard leamed counsel for the parties. 2. At the very outset, tearned counsel appearing for the State submits that the order pa^ed by this Court in Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria v. State ofChhaftisgarh andothers1 and other connected matters has not been complied with by the respondent authorities {n its tetter and spirit, thus the matter may be remitted back for reconsideration. 3. In view of for^oing, the impugned order dated 27-9-2010 is quashed and the Sub Diyistonal Officer (Revenue), Bilaspur, present in the Court, is directed to reconsider the matter afresh in the light of above-stated judgment and order passed by this Court within a period of 15 days. 4. In the meantime, the petltioner is at liberty to produce all dther relevant documents, if so required within a period of one week. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order asto co^s. Sd/- SatishK.AgmhoW Judge ^shok 1 WP ~(S) No. 3338 of 2007 (decided on 19-8-2010)