IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN MONDAY, THE 10TH OCTOBER 2011 / 18TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 24502 of 2011(K) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- SURESH KUMAR, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, AGED 43, VADAKKEDATHUVAYALIL HOUSE, CHELACHUVADU P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN-685 606. BY ADV. SRI.S.R.SREEJITH RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.PIN-695 001 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEDUNKANDAM POLICE STATION, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN-685 553. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEDUNKANDAM POLICE STATION, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN-685 553. 4. SHRIAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO. LTD., CAPITAL BUILDING, CHENNATTUMATTAM JUNCTION, KATTAPPANA, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN-685 508, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.24502/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE VEHICLE BEARING REGISTRATION NO.KL-05-V-1751. P2 COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT OF THE SAID STAGE CARRIAGE, VALID FROM 18/08/2011 TO 06/09/2011. P3 COPY OF THE RECEIPTS SHOWING THE PAYMENTS MADE BY THE PETITIONER. P4 COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 26/08/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & P.BHAVADASAN, J,J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.24502 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 10th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T P.BHAVADASAN,J In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks police protection for the smooth plying of a state carriage vehicle bearing Regn.No.KL-05-V-1751. The allegation is that the 4th respondent from whom the petitioner has availed of hire purchase facility has threatened to forcibly take away the vehicle. Petitioner points out that he has been paying the installment promptly and that the 4th respondent has no right to interfere with the plying of the vehicle. 2. The 4th respondent, who has entered appearance would represent that he had no intention to obstruct the use of the state carriage vehicle by the petitioner. Recording the above submission this writ petition is disposed of. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE kkj