IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.960 of 2010 PANKAJ PASWAN . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 4. 5.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 395 and 354 of the Penal Code is that he is not one of the four named accused who were allegedy accompanied by 8-9 unknown. He is stated to have no antecedent. This Court has considered the materials from the case diary noticed in the impugned order of rejection when evidence under Section 161 Cr. P.C. transpires beyond the allegations itself. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Sarsi P.S. Case No. 90 of 2008. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)