q-r ,S,!. Gff ^Vtlis IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH PETITIONER P.R.No. presentedbySh dated.....---c? RESPONDENT -T^ 'p WRIT PETITIONJMO.-tf?^ 6 /2006 / Smt. Shashikala Verma W/o Shri Balkaran Lal Verma Age about44 years, Asstt. Teacher PrimarySchool, Changorabhata Block-Dharsiwa, Distt- Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur(C.G.) 2. District Education Officer Raipur(C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer Block-Tilda, Disstt.-Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .^*''^> ^.^ o." XI-HC-78 a-n^T^iiSm^; craTsn^TgiiiN; +11*1^1 Sh+lltd 3ST-:qraRTq', ®Tntf'l(o,('K'tltiy • •\fd.p.l^?...l4.u(..L— 3ii^i 4aw ('i?^"'^) 18.8.2!^W^T3^T couhsel Shri Somkant Verma, Shri Sumesh Bajaj, ©ovt. on advance copy. Heard both the counsel. The caseof the petition^ Teacher since 15-7-83 and as issued by the State of M.P. th4 B.T.I., B.Ed. and M.Ed. 22-10-64 are entitled for (Sovernment is Annexure-P/1. examination on her ovm cost i(i that eff&ct is Annexure-P/3, the benefit whereas, similariy two advance incretnents underl Court vide Annexure-P/4. Having heard learned the facts and circumstances opinion on the merit of the ca^< detailed representation along vu^i grievonces to respondent No.2 ond in 1zirn, respondent No.2 i^ petitioner in the iight of aver^ qiiitci'n'i iiHial ffteI^t<Ri<?;;i< ^isrf^rsn^T for the petitioner. Advocate for the State/respondents, ;r is that she is workin9 as Assistant ber the Instructions dated 24-12-98 Assistant Teache.rs who have passed on their own expenses after advonce increments and order of The petitioner passed her B. Ed. the year 1992 and a certificate to the petitioner has not been given situated persons have been granted the orders of the Tribunal and this examitiation tw|o Itl ttut coUnse for the parties, having regard to >f the case, without expressing ciny }e., the petitioner is altowed to make a th copy of this petition raising ail her ^vithin a period of 15 days from today directed to examine the case of the made by the petitioner in this averhients P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3^'^iraTcTO, WTfl'M'ie, Rldiuy tTWOT ^tfTcfi Wi[ 200 3T1^?T Msiqi (li?l(^<s«^T) .3n^T^It2?TR; crar 3ii^r sfiiti ">A Barve '•-4 00 y y' 'STtiTWtrf^a'sTi^r -^ petition and in the representatio) to the conclusion that similariy Jf the benefit of two advance incrle also covered for grant of two fiovernment's order, then to pas^ from today, in accordance with With the direction aforesald Parties are entitled for cer ^i also. If respondent No.2 reaches |ituated persons have been granted inc^ements and the petitioner's case is 4dvance increments on the basis of orders within a period of 3 months ]ail». I, the petition stands disposed of. r^ified copy of this order. •tll'illl'l'ifl') WHVli ff fsS <(a|t<l< ^Sl^irST^T L.C. Judge P.T.O.