x _ _ 1' ' shim Emm C ESWW / IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATISGARH AT BILASPUR WRW 271005 PETITIONER Tiju Sahu, aged 54 years, Son of Ramji Sahu, Revenue Inspector Duxg 1 Cricle Tahsil and district Durg. Versus RESPONDENTS /1. The State Government of Chhatisgarh, Through The Secretary, Revenue, Department, D.K’S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). /~ 2. The District Collector, Durg (C.G.) ( 3. Shri Revenue Romanlal Inspector Belchandan Anda Circle l District Durg. ‘ Writ Petition ,Under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. i / XI—HC—78 33W,m,W IA) f rvy L, t1 e ) WW @3“ E 200‘5r— Wmwww) WWW amméwm WWW WWEWW %af%tr?m%¥1 36/10/2606 Shri Ajay Shrivasmva, co Sim. Anju Ahuja, Dy. 60v 'No.1&2. Shri T..K. Tiwar'i, counse! é Learned counsel for The der, fhis pefi‘i‘ion has become ihfrucfuous hé‘nce ‘rhe pefi‘rion may be dismissed as infmcfuous. Learned counsel appeari‘ wi’rhdmwai of This pe‘iifion and < There is no ground 1‘0 pe‘ri‘i’ioner himseif does no? wan View of subsequen'i' fransfer o dismissed as have become infruc In View of above ordei disposed of. Satish K. Agnihou'i Judge Kvr' ‘i'ha subsequem' 'rmnsfer- or pe‘rifioner submi'rs ‘H'i’n‘r‘ in View of Jnsel for fhe pefii’ioner. f. Advoccd‘e for STa'fe/respondems or' respondem’ Ne. 3. 1g for respondenf No. 3 opposed ‘iher respondenfs do no? oppose. anfer‘ioin his'opposifion when fine i’ To pursue f‘ne mo‘H’er any more in rder. The pefi‘rion is accordingiy a‘uous. ', M.(W).P. No. 361/2006 sfands Sdl- P.T.O.