IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Cr.A.No. (37/ ci 2001. APPELLANT 5lB) \ \§ ‘\ : ' VISHNU SINGH, aged about 33 Yrs l Son of Paduman singh, R/G - Village — Semartal, Police- ‘Station Koni, Distt. Bilaspur. VE RSUS $f RESPONDENT $ \ 1CRIMINAL APPEAL UNDER SECTION 374 OF ‘THE CODE OF \ 1 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE .~ The Stat'e 9f Chhattisgarh; Through: Police Station— ’Koni. Dis’trict— BILASPUR (c .G .) i" ”¥i#i V ‘m‘ ' W XI—HC-78 HW,WW,W m QWJ~3% \ g?) mm(W> 3mg . mmmmv i 4— Wmifwm a;ar%w.m 1x: 19-02-2007 Appenant — Vishnu Singh with Shri Suresh Velma, Advocatc. Complainant — Smt.. Shiv Kumari Suryawanshi with Shri ' i Shiv Kumar Guha, Advocate. Shri Guha, Advocate fmrsonally idenu'fles thp complainant — Smt. Shiv Kumari. u 1‘ Idenu£ca1ion be dons in thc order sheet. M.[Cri.l2. “0.178212% § £ This isian application‘for pcrmission f0 compound the “ ‘oEences. The same is supported, by an affidavit of accused] appellant - Vishnu Singh and complainant — Shiv Knmari €Suryawanshi. _ By the aforesaid applica1ion filed under Section 320 (2) 85 (5) :of the Code of Cn'minal Procedure, the parties are praying for permission to compound the oh‘ences. Heald. Record perused. The appellant has been convicted under Sections 451, 354 8r. 379 of IPC. W 7W g! XI—HC-78 ,WE,W &;,@f}m( I have pelg’sonaNy enquired mm the codlplainant as to :Whether she has compounded the odenees with the accused] appellanft, on which, the complainant Iepljed that she had compromised with the appe t and now she does not want that the appellant should be con lcted and sent to JaJI 1n tlus case \ I In Vlew of the abov , the apphcauon for permlssmn to compound the oh‘ences Is albwed M.(Cri.)P. N:o. 1782/ 2 stands disposed of. Q and now the retons bet 11 the parties are cordial and both of them want that the matter should be dispoéed of on the comprmmse. The above statements; made by both of them before this Court are taken on record. 0 lai w e XI—HC-78 10f payment of one to further undergo simple imp5risonment for 2 ‘fmonths 'With a (l:irection tc iacquitted of‘the aiforesaid ofFences, as a result of @e compromise ' betvzeen 111a partiés. In View of t{he above, 30Eences ‘under Seintious 3S4 i -‘ The appeHaTt, who h been conVicted under Sections. 354, '§451 and 379 of IFfC and sent; E The mat‘t‘er stands may disposed of. d ’ / y i f i i :nced to undergo R.I. for one year, R.I. }for one year, KL. for ‘ 1 year aid to Pay a $1e ofRs. ? ‘. O -, in default § $ run the sentences concurrentlyg is y/“Kw, " SW“ o (/”rSsh w 3“&ge L / 's application for compounding the 451 and 379 ofIPc {is allowed.