H'%F§ §§¥J£RT QE: $§*’3§=§§i‘§’?i3€”’§é§%§é $33" §$§L533FQ§R g5Qg§§Q€f"%i w§§i$§$ $€3R§3M §=§£Iv§vgém w ; éwumaiwg a£a$§§ii E$ éggLE Sh%%§ $£§: Ei“ KEWAR $§§x§HA, a5. W?§€ Q§i§§§m§ am? 33$; i a3“ @Wi s?! l i a Peiita‘anefs ’§. Ram$§ya Gupia aged about 52 yeai‘a 8/3 Shri Jaipra~3ati Euata wafd NO. 6 Contradar C:s§cray, Gugaaa, D } Bk! anha§ hear l m. J$$Y$ L§snen$ary Digirim wwg {€%:h‘tt§$garh) : u 2. Hamar Khan aged abaut 46 S/G‘ Mustgha Knan L‘ mo r31 ye&?3 288“: MAP. (CG) Hausing 5‘3magm A i‘90mm, ! DLCI mm F" ua3a§m :- £ E’iua’g (Shhaitiwam) 3. Bwuiai Patei aged 3mm 48 u .. a/G n "H. bnuKharam l Faxei l. i gag. Rm Qr‘ Na. 48 $ector 2 Streei 4‘§ P')L‘! whai ' ’3 4 r\' usstricx t ‘ v; Burg ($hhai’iisgarh) 4. Raiena‘ra $ingh Shandei aged abéjui 4§ am ("l l:aae & ahri h yeam Namu $i‘ngh Chanda Rio Chanda Elecir‘maEs ESP Mamet Mamda Sestor, Bhilai F‘Lgurig ail i {"K uLgE'g x‘gu \Chl‘m I ins-J?i$g&: ufA U 5. ffmnba; i‘xaahiiiang aged abmit ‘ ~12 ,aa:$ ‘g‘w’o Dauva Ram cauiicimr ward ne. M&mimg I‘;z! Our DI WC; Ant lug u I'\ f3 ixijauai'mna in Ah Sec’mr E’miai Diarict Surg \vx (1‘ .1 In:au€$§&i’: w mt i, Muka3h 'E‘éwari aged abeut 33 yaax; s/a Shri Parmeshwar Pragaa Tiwari R/C; Qr‘ Na. 24 Ward Ne. 45 Pciice Line Sectsr 6 Bhiiai Diwict Durg {Chhat?isgarh} 7. $amay La; Sahu aged abaut f‘f‘ (“I anri (\L !r\ll I. i l cu yeax ma Ivaanangua; and tha suspansion was consequently xevoked on 12.5.2003. Accoxding to learnad counsel for the. peiitioncr the impugned nausfer curler was passed at the instance of those persons, who had made allegations of misconduct against the petitioner Earlier, which resulted into the exoneration from the alleged misconduct. It is not proved by any other document or any other conduct of the persons who were allegedly instrumental in getting the petitioner u‘ansferr'ed. Learned counsel has not disclosed even names of the persons, who have made complaints and the impugned transfer order was passed at their complaints. The allegation is as vague as it could be without being supported by any documents and as such, the same deserves to be rejected. One or two transfer order passed in a short period does not amount to frequent transfers so as to vitiate the ,1 transfer order. The transfer of the petitioner was made along with several othersdue to administrative exigency in public interest, as is clear &om the impugned transfer order. The respondents have clearly stated in their reply as under:- “It is again reiterated that the transfer order has been issued due to administrative exigeney and no political interference or any other consideranon involved in issuing the impugned order of transfer. As regards payment of salary for the period July 2003 to 8—1—2004, the petitioner was absent from duties and for this reason she was not paid her salary etc. In this regard it: is submitted that absent period of the petitioner shall be regularized as and when she applies for regularization of her absent perd and thereafter only necessary orders with regard to payment of salary to. the petin'oner may be passed.” The Supreme Court in the catena of decisions, mainly in the case of E. P. Royappa Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, A.I.R. 1974 S.C. 555 K. Narayanan & others Vs. State of Karnataka &. others A.I.R. 1994 S.C. §§_, B. Varadha Ra'o Vs.State of Karnataka &. others, A.I.R. 1986 S.C. / io Q IQEEJE 2‘ m é’ixabwéayy, 2%3 w“ 3§g ~ The. €0§§$Wing arder of thg Cam? W$5 paswd mi Eggéev Gwgia? Qé $hri HE: Agrawai, liaamed Sieniar Advocaie with 53m JK‘Gupia, igamad ceunsei fer r'gas‘wsmeiiis N9. 3, 4 & 5 has rai$ed a preiiminary ebgeciian amui ma mantamabéiity (3f the Wm pei§iior§ ag Publ‘ic imawst Liiigatmra, as: petitiamrs 4; ta 4 have theia’ Gwn inmrést in the maiter. 2. Shri Pfaghant MisWa ieamed caunsei forihe gei§tioners, in View m“ the above awestian, seeks pe¥m§3$§0n to wéthdraw ihe Wm petitécn fikeci by the peii’rjaners as l Rmiic interegi Lit§gation with iiberty m” mmg anaiher pemion far €he redre$sa§ of fheir N grigvances pmjected m iha writ pe‘iiiien in their individua! capaciiy. 3. Permisgmn gmnteai. 4‘ With ihe above libmy; the wrii patiimn is dismi$sed as nimmi wiihdrawri. \ SW= #"/ E ‘ SamiE Kumar §mha (/W sd/— [ ‘ 3m§1m3 ‘ 5 Chief Justice , WV