^ M w^ '•^ .0.. an ttil ^o!^M ^,s.^;^^ ••tiii ^.. 'M- co w •^^^ lil ?i: ^M ^:@I.'tl &': -^; I^S' JSj €0 .S'tt- iig:Si:^ ^ss^ :-"Ai%. :^^ 's-^ ^ilii^ •MSt^ : w '^ $ m^. w 1 %: ;:e°i i3^ll; ,,^ ,^1 a ^M^ :?=fc:©:;' ^a&^ II J!"I r.1 •:-'t' 1 ^ &§ -ii, /'fl' .11 i:;^ 'ttt iwm ^ m •m "-©" "^' ^^x«;.; •^M ^^: ¥M^ :11 •3t•ti :T? ^m i •^' II ^i;il ^w li1:;; I? ':m ^? •^gi1 ^•r ^i£; ?t. ^i^ ^ ;.^I'it ^fe ^';:;--l.r<g;-; ^^: :G'.M II ^ s^ 's^' ^., A r"li- ^ M ^g ::£' :^, "^ ^:jit ^m- •^ K :% %1 ^ ^ }^& ;^,i w^r ^t ^ ^ t!II !1^: }mmm S 1m 'm m\t 51 ^jsy 1 1m •z. ^ I 1: ..ls3.f—\:-t. ^.iia ^iiIt ^^:^Sff ^l^i ^lr:^: %1 ii:i: [S ^ II ^. ^l 'Mm Q-- ^ i- m Sii^ •tiii^ :IIIil .§"1^^;§'^ II'III ^,^y^ '®.'g,;l®^^%' ' M ^iii^,l®- ll;illilSI ^i^- ii?i;; l^ ,« S?9 M. saa 1 mis ^KIS^^S m^ v^ ;.1;2.r^'Jaipal,:S/o^Late,.t.pdhal^am''l':?...;'^f:;l 13. Srichand,S/oLateLodhaRam 14. Ashok, S/o tate Lodha Ram 15. Rajkuma^ RespondentNo: 11 t&15,Resi<ientof Near Bihan^^^^^^ T^ (Chhattisgarti) 16. Shankarlal, S/o TuSaram, resident of Near Bihari Talkies, Bilaspur (Ghhattisgarh) 17. Premi Bai, D/o Lsfe Amardas, 18. Neeti Bai, D/o Late Amardas, 19. JanKiBaE, D/oLateAmarcias, f^sponcient N6J7 t SindhlCQtony, S^aigarhKChhattisgarh) 20. Udhsm Das, S/o Paraumai, Resident of Siocihi ©olony, Raigarh, 'Tehsil & 0(stnctRaigarh(Ghhattjsgarh) 21, SNe of Chhattisgarh, Thi^g^ Coliector, Ralgarli, Tehsil & Djstrict Raigarii.Ghhattisgaril ^ritPetitionunderAi^Gle^^oftheOon^ :(SB^'Hon'bSQ(MF>'!T.P.'aharma,;J.),'';:':.1';'^ Present:-.;.-,''L1..1.', ,:'11'.^11^:1', •^::... Mr.Spurabh Sharna, counset for the petitioner, | Mr.Rarag Kotecha,Gounseiforrespondent9No.1to4. Mr.Rakesh KumarJha, Dy.Govt.^voGateforresponc$entNo,21/State. None presentfQrotherrespondents. ,:10RDER:--ll.:.^;:l,..'il.i- '(PassecS'on,.3rd.September,.l2010) .:'l:.;'..:,:;:;,.':(', •'.:.: ••) 1. Bythispetition, fhepetitioner hasGhaiJengedtheiegality&p^ orderdafed 17.12,2009 (ArmexureR/l^pas^^b^ CSass-ji, Raigarh,in^JvjlSuitNo^32-A/0^ CSass-Si, Raigartl has dismi^sed the application IJed ^^^^^^ -1^1^.-1;'..'-^ underSection10GftheOodeofOivliProGedure,1908^^ thegrQundthatthebQththesuJtsw^rencrtpendJngaridthepartiesarer^^ 'same.:!,:;,'':.:1':1..''.-:•:•'....,.; .:r.1''1 .,/^":'.'1.;:'.1.::'' 2. The order is impugnMOn the ground that e^^^ Civii SuitNo.23A/93reIatlngtokbasraNe^1/1area2.53^^^^a^ byAmardasUdasiand12^hersagainstthe8t^a^^ fordeciarationoftitfeinv^JchspsGifJci^uerei^lng^^to whether the sarne was nazui iand pr was owne fi^med and suit was finaSiy decid^^ challenged feefore the 4tt Additionai D^ Ciyi! Appeai N0.24A/2004 and the same was dismtesed^^^^^^^^^^^^^^P judgment and decres is und^r chalienged bgfore j^hts Gpurt in SeConci Appeai,N0.34/2006..•,.•' ':1' l.:,''-.:1.1111'11.'''^,^ 3. 1 have heard Searn^ cQUnseifbrtheparties.peiz^ andotherdocumentsfiiedonbehajfofthepetitioneF. 4. Learned Gounsei for the petitjoner ^brftits that after^^^ Ciwi suit and aifterxfeath of^mardasUdasi plairrtiffNo.^ representatives SHrt.L^wanti Devi and crthers have fiied anothera bearing Civil Suit Np.lOA/06 agalnst one Kanhalyaiai and others %(ho were plaintiffs in first Civji ^uit N0.23A/93 for dedaration anci injunctlon retatingtokhasraNo:251/1area2.53acres,inwhtchthec^ filed thejr written statement and specifx;^^^^^i^ whether Champabai was entitjedtosaiethsiandaton^andwhetherthe agreement written in favour of respondent Np.1 wias nuH an Application under Sedion 10 readwith Sedion 151 ofthe (^ before the triat Coyrt for stay of the suit pn the ground that in the present case, the respondents are ciaiming title through j Ghampabal and Champabalwgsrespohdentinboththee^^s.PrQpertywascwe^^a^ same i.e. khasra No.251/1 and sult issubstantiatSyifoFideciaratip^^ therefore, parties and property in dispute are sybstaritiatiy one and the same betweenthepartjes. 5. Ontheothsrhand, ieamedcounseifcrresppndentsNo.1 tq4sui^ the parties ^re same and firstcMI suit has been d^ appeaSsspSRding,therefbFe,SeGtion10oftheCROwoi.sldcomeintoplay. -4- K'^ 6. Admittediy,asperorderimpygned,eopyMpleatiin9sar^^^^te^ suit was fiied by Amardas Udasi anci othsrs^^^ Smt.Champabai rel^ting to the same lanci. The present sult has been flied by lega! represtentatives QfAmardas.ydasi against^he respondents wh^ are ciaiming titjethrough Champabai. First suit hasbeen clismlssed and second appeaj 1s pending befpre this Court, therefore, partje|, property in dispute and ciaim were substantialSy ons and the same in botft the parties. 7. As regards me question pf appiicabt!ity of Section 10^^^^^^ admittedSy, sujt IncSudes the appeai and appeai Is confinuance^ ^ therefore, Sectlon 10 of the CPG wil! cpme into piay. j 8. Whiie dismissing the appncation, the^nai Court has n^^^^c^ aforesaid aspect andtherebycommittedJil^aiity.Oreierjmpugnedis^^n^ sustainable under the law and iiable to be set aside. 9. Consequently, the petition is 3A^eci.J^oT<ier impugned Is hereby set aside. Subsequent Sliit No.32A/0& pending before the 3rd CMI Jydge Ciass-SI, Raigarh is stayed under Section 10 ofthe GPQ^ti secondappeajfit^agalnstfJFstsuit. Noorderasfec^ Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge