IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18956 of 2010 SONMA DEVI @ SONWA DEVI, WIFE OF LATE NANHKU MOCHI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SHEIKHPURA DEEH, P.S. THARTHARI, DISTT. NALANDA ----- PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SHIVCHARAN MOCHI @ SHIV SHARAN MOCHI, SON OF TETAR MOCHI 3. MAHENDRA MOCHI, SON OF SHIVCHARAN MOCHI @ SHIVSHARAN MOCHI 4. JADU MOCHI, SON OF LATE TETAR MOCHI ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE-SHEIKHPURA DEEH, P.S. HILSA, DISTT. NALANDA. ----- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 09.02.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner is the Informant of the present case who is aggrieved with the order dated17.4.2010 passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Hilsa (Nalanda) in Sessions Trial No. 387 of 1991 by which he has refused to recall her. It has fairly been submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that recall of PW-1 was sought since a compromise had been affected between the parties in the meanwhile. Considering that Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code is not compoundable and compromise cannot be a ground for recall of witness, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)