1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.755 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Zam Zam Enterprises ..Respondent. Ms.Anuradha Mane for appellant. Mr.Jitendra Jain i/b. Joy Legal Consultants for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2009. P.C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel or the revnue. The appeal is filed against the order of remand. Having gone through the impugned order on the factual aspects, no fault can be with the said order. No substantial question of law arises in this appeal and nothing is put before us to point out how the revenue is aggrieved by the I.T.A.T. order. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)