•^^ ^^V L. V-V '. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR rc7G.1 M.C.C. N0.——3-b-——/ 2007 Petitioner^^ M..^^.M <£ ^ESPONDENTS ^ ...^^A ^ ,,^ ^V//,^-' about 45 years ^.<<y ^' ^ C^L-^^" Kartik Ram S/o Bal sai Gond Aged- about 55 yrs. R/o village-Bainhanikhurd, P.0.- Chaitama, Tahsil-PaU, Distt.-Kota [C.G.] VERSUS 1-Ministry of Madhya Pradesh govt. Land Revenue Department, Bhopal. 2-Additional Conunissioner, Bilaspur division, Bilaspur 3.S.D.O. Katghora 4.Secratiy Chhattisgarh govt. Raipur 5.8mt. Nira Bai d/o Palbhawan Singh aged- 6.8mt. Dharam Kunwar widow of Palbhawan Singh aged-about 45 years R/o village- Nawapara, tahsU-Pali, Distt.-Korba [C.G.] APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF W.P.NO. 327/2001 h~"-.^ HISH COURT OF CHHATHS^i^H AT BIUSPUR M.C.C. No. 76 of 2007 Sit^te Beneh'.Hon'bte Shri Sotish K. Agnihotpi, J. Petitioner Respondents Vcrsys Kartic Ram Minlstry of Madhya Pradesh government and others Present: Mr. Sanjay Patel, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Sunites Jom, Pcmel Lawyer for the State. OR&ER (Passed on 23rd DOE/ of February, 2007) This is an application for restoration of orsgind Writ Petition No. 327/200i. This petition came-up for hearin9 before this Court on 9-8-2<X)2. This Court possed the following order^ "The defects, as pointed out by the office note doted 12-3-2001 <& 23-4-2001 be rectified on or before 26-8-2002, fdling which this wnt petition shaSI stands dismissed for non-compliance without further reference to the Bench." 2. The petitioner did mt do anything as such, the petition w<^ dismissed for want of prosecutson. After djsmsssal of the petition, the petitsoner remained tardy <md indolent and did not take any action for a period of cfoout 16CX) dcys. hbw, the petitioner has filed an appiication for condonation of deloy. The application for condonation of dclay does wt discl<^e any r&ason which prevented the petitioner from taking any step in filing the application for restoration of the originol wr-it petition. Oo 3. 4. T1ius, appiicatson for condonation of delay does not disclose suffieient reason for condonation of deioy. Jhc sdd application is dismissed. Consequently, the M.C.C. js al^) dismis^ed. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^