IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 6424 of 2009 Between: T.Gowreshwar Rao S/o.Sri T.Venkat Naidu R/o. Regadi, Srikakulam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 A.P. State Housing Corporation Ltd., represented by its Managing Director, Urdu Galli, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad 2 The Executive Director/District Collector, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District. 3 The Enquiry Officer/Executive Engineer, A.P. State Housing Corporation Ltd., Narsipatnam Division, Visakhapatnam. ..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.RAGHU Counsel for the Respondents: MR.K.MOHAN RAMI REDDY The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated above it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the enquiry conducted by the 3rd respondent and the report submitted vide proceedings Rc.No.4/07/SA/SD/Enquiries/HC, Dt.24.12.2008 and the consequent impugned order proceedings No.Vig.I/54/SKLM/2007-1, dt.5.3.2009 issued by the 1st respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and contrary to Rule-9 of A.P.C.S (CC &A) Rules, 1991 and set aside the same.” After arguing the case for sometime, Sri C.Raghu, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a statutory appeal before the Board of Directors of respondent No.1. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, WPMP No.8390 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 26th March, 2009 vrn