IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 24TH BHADRA 1931 WP(C).No. 25552 of 2009(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- VINEETH S.MENON, AGED 19 YEARS,S/O.P.K.SATHEESAN, PERUMBILLY HOUSE,P.O.POTTA, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK,THRISSUR DISTRICT, KERALA STATE. BY ADV. SRI.A.C.DEVY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE PRINCIPAL, KMCT POLY TECHNIC COLLEGE,KALANTHODE, MANASSERY,MUKKOM P.O.,KOZHIKODE. 2. THE MANAGER, KMCT POLY TECHNIC COLLEGE, KMCT POLY TECHNIC HEAD OFFICE, NEAR MALABAR CHRISTIAN COLLEGE, NADAKAVU,KOZHIKODE. 3. SENIOR JOINT DIRECTOR (PS), TECHANICAL DIRECTORATE, PADMAVILASAM ROAD,FORT, TRIVANDRUM-23. 4. REGIONAL DIRECTORATE OF TECHANICAL EDUCATION,RAILWAY STATION LINK ROAD, VIKAS BUILDING,IIIRD FLOOR,KOZHIKODE. ADV. SRI.ANIL K.NARENDRAN FOR R1 & 2 GOVT. PLEADER SRI.K.RAMESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 25552 of 2009(L) : 2 : APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 7.8.2009 EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION TO THE EDUCATION MINISTER EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 9.8.2009 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ----------------------------- W.P(C) No.25552 of 2009-L ------------------------------ Dated this the 15th day of September, 2009. J U D G M E N T Heard Sri.A.C.Devy, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri.Anil Narendran, the learned counsel appearing for respondents 1 and 2 and Sri.K.Ramesh, the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents 3 and 4. The petitioner, a final year student of KMCT Poly Technic College, Manassery has filed this writ petition aggrieved by Ext.P1order passed by the first respondent placing him under suspension with effect from 6.8.2009. Though Ext.P1 order was passed on 7.8.2009 and 140 days have passed thereafter, till date respondents 1 and 2 have not framed charges against the petitioner and the other student named in Ext.P1. No enquiry has also been conducted by the college. Today, when the writ petition came up for hearing, Sri.Anil Narendran, the learned counsel appearing for respondents 1 and 2 submitted that college authorities do not wish to proceed further in the matter for the reason that no student has come forward to give a compliant against the petitioner and the other student named in Ext.P1. He submits that in such circumstances, respondents 1 and 2 do not propose to take any further action against the petitioner and the other student named in Ext.P1. W.P(C) No.25552 of 2009-L 2 In the light of the said submission, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to forthwith re-admit the petitioner in KMCT Poly Technic College forthwith. The petitioner shall submit an undertaking in the form of an affidavit to the Principal of the college, undertaking to keep good behaviour during the period of his study in the college. Sd/- P.N.RAVINDRAN JUDGE //True Copy// PA to Judge ab