IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No 1080 of 2001 in SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATIONNo 9785 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.P.BUCH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER Versus SECRETARY -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No. 1080 of 2001 MR Jayant Patel with Mr MUKESH A PATEL for Appellants No. 1-2 MR T R MIshra with Mr CP JADHAV for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE and MR.JUSTICE D.P.BUCH Date of decision: 08/10/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE) We have heard the learned Advocates and have also perused the impugned judgment delivered by the learned Single Judge. We have carefully gone through the judgment delivered by the learned Single Judge and we are in agreement with the reasons for which the petition has been rejected. In our opinion, there is no reason to interfere with the said judgment. Hence this appeal is dismissed. Looking to the facts of the case, the request made by the learned Advocate for the appellants to continue the order of ad-interim relief which was granted by the learned Single Judge is directed to be continued for a period of six weeks from today. 8.10.2001 [A R Dave, J.] [D P Buch, J.] msp