1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3253 OF 2010 1. Ratan w/o. Sandip Bahir, Age 25 yrs., Occu. Household, 2. Rajubai w/o. Rohidas Bahir, Age 70 yrs., Occu. Nil, Both R/o. Katewadi, Tq. Jamkhed, Dist. Ahmednagar. ....Applicants. Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra 2. The Superintendent of Police, Ahmednagar, Dist. Ahmednagar. ....Respondents. Mr. K.S. Bhore, Advocate for applicants. Mrs. B.R. Kale, A.P.P. for State. CORAM: V.R.KINGAONKAR, J. DATED: 25th August, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. Application (Cr. A. No. 3253/2010) shows age of applicant No. 2 Rajubai as 70 years whereas copy of the ration card filed at P-15 shows her age as 45 years. It is obvious that untrue statement is made about her 2 age in order to get certain sympathy or in order to show that she is a senior citizen. Such misinformation by itself is sufficient ground to deny the discretionary relief to the applicants. 2. Having heard learned counsel for applicants and on going through the relevant recitals of the F.I.R., it is apparent that names of applicants have been shown as the persons who used to instigate the husband of deceased Anita. It appears that said Anita frequently ventilated grievances about matrimonial cruelty meted out by her husband and his relatives. The names of all the applicants have been referred to in the F.I.R. The matter is under investigation. The dead body of Anita was found in a well. It also appears that in the house of her husband, there was some drug; smell which was repugnant. Considering the prima facie material and incorrect statement made in the application, the application is dismissed. [ V.R.KINGAONKAR, J.] ssc/ca3253.10