1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6406/2009 Chhagan Lal vs Chairman & MGB Gramin Bank & Ors. DATE OF ORDER: 8.7.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. JD Bhati, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is facing domestic inquiry and allegations against the petitioner are 18 in number as is clear from the charge-sheet, copy of which has been placed on record. The petitioner has also been suspended. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner's services may be terminated without completion of the inquiry and, therefore, the petitioner approached this Court. However, from the prayer made in the writ petition it appears that petitioner has challenged the order of suspension dated 18.12.2006 and for quashing of the departmental proceedings. I do not find any reason to grant any of the relief either orally prayed or as claimed in the writ petition. The employer has right to suspend the employee during the pendency of the 2 departmental inquiry and nothing has been substantially said as against the order of suspension dated 18.12.2006. So far as apprehension of termination of the petitioner is concerned, there is no factual foundation and, therefore, I do not find any reason to grant relief so as to direct the respondents not to terminate the services of the petitioner at this stage. In view of the above, there is no merit in this writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-