IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1013 of 2007 KALI KANT JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 11.11.2008 Heard. In the instant writ application the petitioner prays for restraining the respondent from taking any coercive measures till final form is filed in respect to him. The learned counsel submits that Ist charge sheet was submitted on o7.12.2007 against six persons and the second charge sheet was submitted on 24.3.2008 against two persons and the investigation against him continued. He submits that during the pendency of the investigation warrant has been issued against the petitioner. The prayer is that a direction be given that no coercive step be taken till final form is submitted. The petitioner had earlier filed a writ application being Cr.W.J.C. No.34/04 for quashing the F.I.R. which was permitted to be withdrawn on 20.12.2004 with liberty that, if ultimately chargesheet is submitted against the petitioner and cognizance is taken, then he may challenge the order of cognizance in accordance with law. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties this Court does not find any reason for acceding to the relief prayed for in the writ application. However, it would be open to the petitioner to take all 2 these points at the time of filing bail application that though more than five years have elapsed still no charge sheet has been filed against him. With the aforesaid observation this writ application is disposed of.. Anilksinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)