IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 1ST JANUARY 2008 / 11TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 38078 of 2007(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- KURUVILA , AGED 74 YEARS, S/O. KURUVILA, PULLALIKKAL HOUSE, PAMPADY VILLAGE KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.GIRIJA.L. RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, TRIVANDRUM. 2. SPECIAL SALE OFFICER KOOROPPADA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.3965 KOOROPPADA KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 3. SECRETARY KOOROPPADA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.3965 KOOROPPADA KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 4. JOSEPH KURUVILA S/O.KURUVILA PULLOLICKAL HOUSE, PAMPADY VILLAGE KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY SR.GOVT.PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.38078 of 2007-G = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 1st day of January, 2008. JUDGMENT 1.The fourth respondent is the son of the petitioner. He is a debtor to a co-operative society. Sale proceedings have been initiated and have resulted in issuance of the impugned Ext.P3. According to the petitioner, his property and that of the fourth respondent lie contiguous and have to be demarcated, for which purpose a suit has been filed as Ext.P2 in 2007. On such premise, the petitioner seeks interference with the impugned sale proceedings. 2.From what is stated above, it can be seen that the impugned proceedings are not vitiated on ground of any jurisdictional error or legal infirmity and even if the petitioner has any WP(C)38078/07 -: 2 :- legal grievance regarding the property that is brought to sale, sufficient remedies are open to him within the frame work of Kerala Co-operative Societies Act and Rules, including for statutory remedies before the superior authorities. Under such circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed, without prejudice to any such course of action. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/