IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16798 of 2010 HIMANSHU @ HIMANSHU RAJ, son of Late Suresh Chandra Prasad, resident of Mohalla Rambagh Chouri, P.S. Mithanpura, Distt. Muzaffarpur. ---Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.5.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also the learned counsel for the informant, who has appeared and filed Vakalatnama. The offence alleged against the petitioner, who is apprehending his arrest in a police case, is under sections 376 and 120B of the Penal Code. It is submitted that the petitioner is being prosecuted in the criminal case for some ulterior purposes. The allegation is that the informant, a major lady, has alleged that although the petitioner is leaving with her for the last three-four years, but still he is not marrying her even after having sexual relation with her. Learned counsel for the informant submits that even on 17th of January, 2010, the petitioner stated before the police that he is going to marry but even then the petitioner is not marrying her and as such the First Information Report was lodged on 21st of January, 2010. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Muzaffarpur (Town) P.S. Case No.33/2010 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)