IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 7756 of 2010 Date of Decision: 30.11.2010 Punjab Financial Corporation .... Petitioner Versus Anil Kumar Soni ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. V.M. Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that on 13.3.2009, plaintiff has reserved his right to lead evidence in rebuttal on the issues the onus of which was on the defendant. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that even if evidence in affirmative after the evidence of the defendant was rejected, plaintiff has every right to lead evidence in rebuttal in view of the order dated 13.3.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that an appropriate application shall be moved before the learned trial Court to permit the plaintiff to lead evidence in rebuttal on the issues onus of which was on the defendant. He seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to move aforesaid application. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to move appropriate application before the trial Court which shall be disposed of by the trial Court in accordance with law. (ALOK SINGH) 30.11.2010 JUDGE reena