IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN THURSDAY, THE 1ST JULY 2010 / 10TH ASHADHA 1932 RP.No. 26 of 2004(H) -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.26539/2002 Dated 28/08/2003 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: --------------------------------------------------- J. LEENA, H.S.A., D.B.H.S.S. PARUMALA. BY ADV. SMT.MOLLY JACOB RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT (GENERAL) EDUCATION DEPARATMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. SMT.SREELATHA DEVI, H.S.A., D.B.H.S.S., PARUMALA. R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.G.P.PANICKER, SC R2&3 BY G.P. SRI.LAKSHMI NARAYAN R4 BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. .................................................................... R.P. No.26 of 2004 in O.P. No.26539 of 2002 .................................................................... Dated this the 1st day of July, 2010. ORDER Ramachandran Nair, J. We do not find any merit in the Review Petition because this court had given opportunity to the petitioner to raise objection before the departmental authorities against the appointment of the 4th respondent and with regard to petitioner's preferential claim over that. Review Petition pending for the last six years is, therefore, dismissed as devoid of any merit. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge P.S.GOPINATHAN Judge pms