IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Bail Cancellation Application No.08 of 2009 Order on the Bail cancellation application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Mota Singh Kalsi ...….Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand & another …….Opposite party Dated: March 11, 2010 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the applicant and Sri M.A. Khan, learned Brief Holder for the State as well as Smt. Pushpa Joshi, Advocate for the respondent no.2. By way of this bail cancellation application, the applicant has prayed to cancel the bail of the accused Dilbag Singh (respondent no.2) granted by learned Sessions Judge, Udham Singh Nagar on 3.10.2009. I have perused the bail order dated 3.10.2009 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Udham Singh Nagar and also the finding recorded by the trial court while granting bail to the accused Dilbagh Singh. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers on record, I do not find any ground to cancel the bail of the accused Dilbagh Singh. The order of learned Sessions Judge granting bail to the accused Dilbagh Singh is correct and requires no interference by this Court. The bail cancellation application is accordingly rejected. (Dharam Veer, J.) 11.03.2010 RG