IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH APRIL 2008 / 20TH CHAITHRA 1930 Bail Appl..No. 2143 of 2008() ----------------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED. ------------------------------------ SAJAYAN P., S/O. PURUSHOTHAMAN, H2 PALADIUM APARTMENTS, ELAMAKKARA, KOCHI. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT. ------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALAMASSERY POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JAI GEORGE. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT, J. ------------------------------------------------- B.A. No. 2143 of 2008 ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of April, 2008 ORDER Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioners apprehends arrest on the allegation that he has committed non- bailable offences against his employer – M/s Inflex Marketing Services India Pvt. Ltd., and its officials. 2. Notice was given to the learned Public Prosecutor. The learned Public Prosecutor, after taking instructions, submits that it is true that a complaint has been received against the petitioner from his employer. One Jagadhamma and Subramanian - parents of the Managing Director of the petitioner's former employer, have filed a complaint before the Commissioner of Police which was forwarded to the Kalamassery Police Station. The Kalamassery police, on realising that the alleged conduct does not fall within the B.A. No. 2143 of 2008 -: 2 :- jurisdiction of the Kalamassery Police Station, had returned the complaint to the City Police Commissioner and the City Police Commissioner has now forwarded the same to the Central Police Station, Ernakulam. They have on considering the complaint not chosen to register any crime; but has instead chosen to register that as a petition. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner is not required to be arrested and shall not be arrested in connection with that petition. The learned Public Prosecutor further undertakes that if the petitioner were to be arrested at any later stage on the allegation that he has committed non-bailable offences prior to this day against the former employer of the petitioner or two other persons referred above, prior notice shall be given to the petitioner and prior permission of this Court shall be taken before effecting such arrest. The submission of the learned Public Prosecutor is taken note of and recorded. The apprehension of the petitioner, in these circumstances, is found to be without any merit. This petition is accordingly dismissed as agreed accepting the submission/undertaking of the learned Public Prosecutor. Sd/- (R. BASANT, JUDGE) Nan/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge