IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10422 of 2009 DWARIKA PRASAD GUPTA SON OF LATE RAM LAKHAN PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JALPURA, P.S. CHANDI, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR, PRESENTLY C/O RAMA SHRYE PRASAD BHAGAT NEAR NEW KACHAHARY (CIVIL COURT), NAWADAH Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL (PROSECUTION), PROSECUTION DIRECTORATE, BIHAR, PATNA BAIRACK NO. 5 MAIN SECRETARIATE, PATNA-15 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (LEGAL) INCHARGE PROSECUTION DIRECTORATE, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY, PROSECUTION DIRECTORATE, HOME (POLICE DEPARTMENT) BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, GAYA 6. THE NODAL OFFICER, PENSION CELL CUM ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, GAYA 7. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA 8. THE DIRECTOR, PROVIDENT FUND, BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 11 23.07.2010 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add the Director, Provident Fund, Bihar, Patna as the party-respondent no.8. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 30th November, 2007 from the post of Regional Prosecution Officer, Magadh Division, Gaya, the petitioner is not being paid his pension considering the revision of his pay scale. In other words, the petitioner is receiving the pension on the old pay scale with the result the petitioner is suffering financial hardship continuously. The other grievance of the petitioner is non-payment of full G.P.F. as the deductions made from the salary of the petitioner while he was posted at different places were not sent to the District Provident Fund Officer, Gay despite request made by him. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State - 2 - submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered & settled without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the claim with regard to fixation of pay-scale, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.2 with copy to the respondent no.7 and with regard to the claim for payment of provident fund dues petitioner proposes to file a separate representation before the respondent no.8. In such view of the matter, in case such representations stating details of unpaid claims are filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the respective representations shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representations so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled without delay and necessary orders may also be issued with regard to the aforesaid claims. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)