1 Amk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 82 OF 2009 Dilip Lalman Jaiswal & ors. ... Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.Khan Abdul Wahab for the applicants. Mr. C. D’Souza with Mr. A.P. Mundargi i/b M/s. Kunduru and Kunduru for respondent No.2. Mr.S.A. Shaikh APP for the respondent State. CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. Dated :- 15th September, 2009. PC : 01. This revision application is filed against the order dated 21st January, 2009 passed by the 2nd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai rejecting the application filed by the prosecution under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Wherein prayer was made that the present respondent No.2 is to be made an accused. The submission of learned counsel for the applicant that the learned Sessions Judge has erred in not appreciating that the name 2 of respondent No.2 was mentioned in the supplementary statement of the complainant and so also that the complainant has given a complaint against police officer for non taking any action against respondent No.2. 02. In the impugned order the Sessions Judge has considered the aspect of omission of the names in the statements and also the involvement of respondent No.2 in the crime in the right perspective. The application under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is made at very late stage and the view taken by the learned Sessions Judge is found just and legal while rejecting the said application. No interference in the said order. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)