IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1260 of 2004 SRI SURENDRA KUMAR PANDEY, S/O SRI ISHWAR DAYAL PANDEY, R/O VILLAGE-DARWAN, P.S.- RAMGARH, DISTRICT-ROHTAS, AT PRESENT ASSISTANT TEACHER TRIDANDIDEO RESIDENTIAL SANSKRIT HIGH SCHOOL, CHARITRABAN BUXAR, P.S.-BUXAR,DISTRICT-BUXAR. ………………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SPECIAL DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. SPECIAL DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR RAJYA SANSKRIT SHIKSHA BOARD, BIHAR, BORING CANAL ROAD,PATNA. 4. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR RAJYA SANSKRIT SHIKSHA BOARD, BORING CANAL ROAD, PATNA. 5. THE HEADMASTER, SRI TRIDANDIDEO RESIDENTIAL SANSKRIT HIGH SCHOOL, CHARITRABAN, BUXAR, P.S.-BUXAR, DISTRICT-BUXAR. ----------- 3 16.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for the Board. From the counter affidavit it appears that the matter of termination of the petitioner reached up to the level of the Special Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna who passed orders vide Annexure-4 to the writ application directing for payment of salary of the petitioner from 7.3.1989, therefore, entitlement of salary to the petitioner has been accepted with effect from 7.3.1989. It is said that the department has been requested for allotment of fund for the same and as soon as the fund will be available he will be paid his due salary with effect from that date. To this extent there is no dispute. However, learned counsel for the - 2 - petitioner submits that in Annexure-4 there is a typing mistake and in the typed copy the date has been mentioned 7.3.1989 is actually 7.3.1984. He produced photocopy of the said order before this Court from which it appears that the date has been mentioned on the photocopy by pen. Therefore, the correctness of the date mentioned in the photocopy of the said Annexure-4 is required to be verified by the concerned office from which the same was issued. As such petitioner is allowed to file a representation before the Special Director, Secondary Education in this respect who shall consider the representation of the petitioner and verify the facts from the records and pass appropriate orders preferably within a period of two months from the date of filing of the representation. It goes without saying that any consequential orders shall also be passed within the same time. The writ application is accordingly disposed of thus. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)