IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43887 of 2010 SUSHILA DEVI @ LALITA DEVI, WIFE OF ARJUN MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-BAKRAUR, P.S. BODHGYAA, DISTRICT-GAYA…………….PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Binod Kumar No.3, A.P.P. ----------- 2. 14.12.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 304-B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that she is lady and the mother-in-law of the deceased. It has also been submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons and the husband of the petitioner (father-in-law of the deceased), namely, Arjun Mahto, has been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.10.2010 passed in Criminal Misc. No.34967 of 2010. It is also contended that the petitioner is on similar footing to that of aforesaid co-accused, Arjun Mahto. Lastly, 2 it been submitted that some of the accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail also by a Bench of this Court. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Sushila Devi @ Lalita Devi, is directed to be released on bail on her furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Bodhgaya P.S. Case No.67/2010. P.S. ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)