mmw’ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR REVIEW PETmON NO. 3 OF 2009 APPLICANT (S) 1. Union of india, through General Manager, I RESPONDENTS SE. Raiiway. Koikata (WB), Now S.E,C.. ‘ Raiiway, Bilaspur (CG). 2. Divisional Railway Manager, S.E. Railway, (Now S.E.C. Railway), Biiaspur (CG). 3. Sr. Divisianai Commercial Manager, SE. Railway, (Now S.E.C. Railway), Bilaspur . (CG). 4‘ Chief Station Managar, SE. Railway, (Now S.E.C. Raiiway)‘ BflaSpul' (CG). 5. The Commercial inspector, SE. Raiiway, (Now SEC. Railway), Biiaspur (CG). Versus RESPONDENT Shri Rakash' Sharma, S/o Late (Ehri PETiTiQNER Raiendra Prasad Sharma, aged about 33 years, Rio Purana Poiice Line House No.130, Rajendra Nagar. Bilaspur (CG). (Application for review of the order dated 20-1 0-2008 passed in WP No.1 967 of 2002) Single Bench z Hon’ble Shri Salish K. Agnihotri, J. Preaent :« r Mr. Vivek Verma, counsel for the applicants. it; Mr. Parag Kotecha, counselfor the respondent. . i) ORDER oRAL (Passed en’this 9‘ day or July, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the application of the respondent has been considered and allotted place in the Railway Station premises, which has been accepted by the respondent on ~ 29-4-2009, thus, this review petition has become infructuous, to which learned counsel appearing for the respondent has no objection. ' 2) it is ordered as prayed for. 3) Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed as having become . infructuous. Satish K. Agnihotrl Judge Sdl— Gowri