1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1136 /2010 ( Gajanan Kishanrao Suryawanshi vs. State of Maharashtra) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. R M Mardikar, Advocate for applicant Mr.J B Jaiswal, APP for Respondent CORAM : A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATED : 8 th September, 2010. Heard. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.3014/2010 reported at Dongaon Police Station, Dist. Buldana for offence punishable under section 3 read with Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. It is contended on behalf of the applicant that the applicant has an overwhelming support of villagers who filed their affidavits regarding regular supply of foodgrains received by them. My attention has been brought to the Panchnama dated 22nd April, 2010 in which it is mentioned that about 44 quintals of wheat meant for below poverty line people was found; so also 88 bags of wheat of Antodaya quality, apart from rice 28 quintals and pulses 15 kg. were found Under these circumstances, it is contended that this has not been mentioned clearly in the reply opposing the bail application, in paragraph no.5 of the reply. 2 Under these circumstances, I think interim anticipatory bail which was granted on 24.8.2010, is liable to be confirmed, subject to same conditions, besides that the applicant shall not not commit any crime while on bail. Order accordingly. Application disposed of. JUDGE Sahare