1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 101 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 30 OF 2000 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and the Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Coram: A. H. Joshi J. Date : 12th September 2011 Shri S. S. Choudhary, Advocate,instructed by Shri V. M. Maney, Advocate for applicants- appellants. Shri R.R. Mantri, Advocate for Respondent No. 1. Shri R.P. Dhase, Advocate , holding for Shri M. V. Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent No. 2. ---- 1. By this application, review of the order passed by this Court on 15.6.2007 dismissing the Second Appeal, is sought. 2. It is seen from the record that learned trial judge, dismissed the suit on the ground of limitation, holding that the suit was barred by law of limitation, being not filed in accordance with Section 304(1) of the Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1966. 3. The applicant-appellant has not been able to dispute the fact that limitation for a suit against Municipal Council would be governed by Section 304 of 2 the Maharashtra Municipalities Act, which governs the aspect of notice, as well as limitation. The finding on this point is not challenged. 4. In view of this, no other substantial question of law, answered in either way, would result in reversal of the decree. 5. The applicant-appellant has, therefore, failed to persuade this court on the point of error apparent on the face of the record. 6. The review application, therefore, does not merit any indulgence and same is, accordingly, dismissed. ( A. H. JOSHI, J.) pnd/ra-101.11