@ . HIGH COURT OF CHHA‘H‘ESGARH ‘ B¢LASPUR WRIT PETITION NO 781 OF 2004 Mis Ramesh Construction Company, Cio Ramesh Chen-Jada, New Quirati Samaj, ‘Ramdas Nagar, ‘Tikrapara, Disi. Biiawur (CG) Versus PETITIQNER RESPONDENTS 1. Presmmg Off‘cer. Regional Labour Ccmmiwioner (Centra! B!ock N010, CMd Center, Madhaiai. J'abaépuri 2. Labour Enfomement Officer (Carma! Behind 8a?aj% Maridir, Anam‘ Nagar. Rapur). Assistant Labour Ccmmissioner (Central Behind Baiaji Manciir, Anand Nagar, Raipur). »5 (Writ peiiiion under Ariicie 226 and 227’ (31' "ihe ConsiiiutEOn of itidia) Sing!e Bench : Hon’bSe Shri Saris?! K. Agmhotfi, J. Presem :— Shri Azad Sicidique, counsei for the peéiiicnez‘, QBLJw ('ORAQ (Passed on this 4‘“ day ei September, 2mg) Heard iearned counsel for. the petitioner. 2. The petitioner, by this petition, impugns ine ordei daieoi i242~2603 (Annexure’ -— PH) passeei by the Authority under Minimum Wages Acti 1948 and Regional Labour Sommissroner (Centrai), dabaipur, in review petition. The petitioner nae not chaiiengeo the legamy and vaiidiiy of the mam order, which wee sought i0 be reViewed beforeihe Authority under Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and Regional Labour $ommissmner (Central), Jabalpur. 4. On perusal of the order, it appears that the petitioner is not paying the minimum wages as provioed under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 to the lowest paid employees, in the present case 23 workers. it is further found that no sufficient cause was shown for reviewing the main order. which is not under chaiienge in this petition. Thus. there is no error, irreguiarity and iiiegaiity in the impugned order warranting interference by this Court. in the resuit, the writ petition is iiaoie to be and ta ecooroingry dismissed. No order asto costs. 02‘ Sd/- Sau'sh K. Agnihom :55: Judge VJ Gown