HIGH COURT OF CHHATIISGARHAT BI1ASPUR S.B.^ HON'BLE MR. SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITION (O No. 1397 of2007. PETITIONER RE8PONDENTS J.PAwadhiya, S/o. Ram Vislri Awadhiya, aged about 49 years, R/o Imgation Colony, H-l, Oandhi Nagar, Ambikapur, DistrictSurguja, G.G. VERSU8 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. State of Chhattisgarh ,Throi^i: Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, DistrictRaipur(C.G.) Executive Engineer (Sbyam Pariyojna) Pmiyojna Mairial, Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG) S.D.O. Shyam Canal DivisioaNo. 1, Gandhi Nagar, Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG) Collector, Ambikapur, Suiguja (CG) EHsteiet Competent Aathority, AmUkapw under fhe Chhattisgarii Lok Parisar (Bedakhali)Ad}uniyam, 1947. 6. S.K.Misfara, Draftsimn, DivisiCTi 'OfBce, Shyam Bami Pariyoijaa Mandal, Ambikepiir, Distriet Surguja(CG). Present: Shri Manoj Paianjape, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Utkarsh Verma, Deputy Goverament Advocate for Ae State/respondents 1 to 5. None for the respondentnp.6. ^ m ORDER (Passed on 14flxJ!»fercli2(X)7) 1. Learaed couasel appearing for the petitioner siibmits flist the petitioner does not want to press any otfaer ground exeq>t that the respondent aulfaorities be directed to consider fais applieatioa for allotment of oflBeial quarter in accordance with the rules for allotment of quarter (Anaexure P/18) and otiier provisions of law, applicable to allotment ofhouse witfain a stipulated period. Learaed counsel farther subaits tiiat in tiie meantime, no coercive stqis be taken to remove the petitioner where lie is in oecupation. 2. The respondent authorities are direeted to considsr the apptication which may be filed within a period of Ihree days and pass appropriate order in accordance with the rules and regulations appBcable to the ease, withia a period of 15 days. In the meantime, no coercive steps be taken for removal of Ae petition fl?om the premises whereof, he is in possession, for a period cf 18 days. The authorities are at liberty to eharge penal rent for such period, in accordanee with the rules. 3. In view of the above, fhe petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 4. Consequently, M(W)P. No. 932/2007, application for grant of ad- interim writ stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Aarit