7 C^-2^-^^ Si%GlEBENCH INTHEHIGHCOURTOFCHHArnSGARHATBILASPTJR WRn-PETmON (S) N0. b^i $/2010 PETITIONERS /«a^^ •M^W Tfyy^ -i^y^ ^ri^.N^' .;'*-''.S6S&?''V/"'' :tl%y.:. ^::^:y ^^::^:: 1. C.D Diwan S/Q Shri D.D Diwan- aged about 45 year. R/o Gevra Dist.KorbafG.G). 2. Kamla Pati Gupta S/o Agnarum Gupta, agsd about 45 yeai^ R/6 Gevra DistrictKorba(C.G.). 3. Sharad Naidu S/o, P.©Naidu^ aged about 44 year^ Gevra , District Korba (C.Q.). 4. Ashiitosh I^ S/o C^opal Prasad Tiwan, aged about 46 year^R/o Gevra , District Korba.(C.G.). 5. RaiHkishore Gupta S/o H.L Gupta^aged aboi.tt 54 Yeai-, R/o ^;:r''"Gevra .'QijstnGfc;Korba.(C.:©.).|::::.^.•;.!: 6. Ams^ M.Khanyaged about 40 year^ R/Q <3evra ©istrietKorbap.G.). ; i 7, Satinara Pal, Singh Jolly. I S/o Surpt Singlg iJol^ •aged abeut;^40 year R^o tJmarija., Distl-iet Uiliaria -itM.P.)...;''-n..; ;;''. ::i',',:ll.'li: 8. Vikas ^Awasthi S/o R.P iAwa^fhi^ Aged abput 38 year. R^! l-fe^ia, ''©is'b^;'E ^ia^,(M3'.).^''.-"';::',.^, 9. >Ash<^ ISun^ pafel S^b; Amr^E^ i t ^:'\'*^at^?rlage<}rt^ayout;^I^!^ai2;R^Qi:]<]l:!fi :.: - - :-,^3||Hia|t^^l|)ist^f^|rtanai..% .:||,|;; ;lp^^,|ia||ot^nd^|fc,!| n^i;S^o;.|g|M^^ti^ ^Bi%ssiili::-Singh:^-:^ed, afeei |^|a ^•;'J'^.^ •:'iBlttSiyJBI;l';iB; sm ^t^^^ y^'y. l^y-'^. years, R/o. Jayant Colony Dist. Singrouly , (M.P) 11. Binod Kumar , S/o. ,Shri S.G Prasad Aged about 51 Year, R/o. Jayant Colony Dist. Singrouly , (M.P) 12. S.K Bhattacharjee , S/o. ,Shri A.K Bhattacharjee^ Aged about 5 1 Year, R/o. Jayant Colony Dist. Singrouly , (M.P) 13. Yogehdra Kumar Morya S/o Shri Jagdhbri Ram ^ aged about 36 year R/o Umaria, District Umaria (M.P.). F4. Rajesh Kumar Mishra S/o Shri Bhagirathi Mishra^ aged about 45 year , R/o. Chirmiri , District Koriya/(C.G.). 15. Gqfpal Krishna Swain S/o Shri Narayan swain aged about 40 year , R/o. Chirmiri , District Koriya (C.G.). 16. A.V Suryanarayan S/o Shri A.B Rao^aged about 44 year , R/o. Chirmiri , District Koriya (0.0.). 17. SanjayKiunarTiwari S/o Shri J.P Tiwari^ aged about 45 year , R/o. Chirmiri , District Koriya (C.G.). 18. Chatra PalSingh S/o Shri Brij Nandan Singh^ aged abdut 39 year , R/o. Cttirmiri , District KQriya(C.G.). 19. Gajendra Singh S/o Shri A.R Singh aged about 44 year , R/o. Chirmiri , Dista-ict Koriya (C.G.). Bi .i.r- llllflS i'i —^jffi^ t ./^^v 3fr^ SM RESPONDENTS A"^ %?' 20. Loken Rudra S/Q Shri B.K Rudra.aged about 39 year , R/o. ChiTmiri , District Koriya (C.G.). VERSUS 1. Uhion of India, Through the Secretary, Ministry of Coal, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 2. Coallndia Limited, Through the Chairman, 'eoal India Limited, 10, NetajiSubhash Rpad, Kolkata 700001 3. South Eastem Coal Fields Liniited, Through the CMD (Chairmaa-eum-Managing Director) S.E.C.L. Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur'(C.G.) 4. The Director (Personnel) Soiith EastemGoalFieIdLtd; Seepat Road-, Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. The Du-ectpr (Persdnal & Industrial Relations) Goal Ijndia Limited, 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkata 700 001 i WRH* PETimON ^mSEat^R'IE'ICLE 226 OF ' E eONSTl'ii'rat^B^Qg INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE^PETITIQNER v 1 1; STI^T'Wf^TO' TT8H 31T^T w^f^ w ^=T •<ii<(i<i'ii, yiilyis, fildl'M'j.i. ^^m^s:...^1 3n^TTWF(^3^^) vs ^TOR^itosn^i <^l^<n<4ll iTFTcif ^* fe(St <r^^l< ^sifimsn^i S.B: HON'BLE JUSTICE MR. PRI Shri Arv'ind Kumar Dubey, Smt. Smitha Ghai, counse As Shri Praveen Das, South Eastern Coalfields Limitect petitiijsn to accept the notice on behalf of | Counse! for the petitioner^ i.e. W.P. (S) No. 3657/2010, th| 22.7.2010 andthe present of the said order. Counsel for the respondi petition is also disposed of in thj passed by this Court. Petitioners who are (Technical and Supervision) No. 3, have approached this of their case for promotion in promotion contained in offic^ promulgated bythe Coal India Submission of learned according to the policy, 40% oftjji year in various discipline includi| up by way of promotion on de| who normally appears for the is present in the Couri:, is directed j:he respondents No. 2 to 5. ^ submits that in an identicai matter |is Court has passed the order on can also be disposed of in terms Ltld lcounsel for She petition< for respondent No. 1. ijits have no objection If the present fe liaht ofthe order dated 22.7.2010 C4urt working as Foreman Incharge i-A In the service of respondent aggrievea' by non-consideration acjcordance with the existing policy of fic^ memorsndum dated 7/3/2007 I., the holding company. ^ounsel for the petitioners is that tjjie post to be filied up in the financial li^g mining are required to be filled' )artmental basis from amonast the c; ^' Uii_ -HC—78 sn^vw f<-ii<* ^man^rwiw D/- ^5T •<<1<11C1<1, ®Tl1<-f'|to, [sldiy^'t. sn^?i'IT?^'(' T^ITW ^ftg 311^1 —3-j c^ eligib!e officers holding feeder adhering to She policy and whi 2007 the eligible candidates ars according to the existing polis highlighting grievance, a to respondents No. 2, 3 and petitioner remains unredressed.l Taking into consideratlon| appropriate to direct respond< grievance of the petitioner. made in this regard to the promotion shall be considere| promotional scheme in accords not take any decision on jrievances a.re not redressed, approach this Court or take avaitable to them under the law| With the aforesaid resrfondents of. •*l<lifl<<'l-1 ^ltlcfitffeizt <F>1(^1< i;3iRin3iA?i posts but the respondents are not direct recruitment is going on, since not being considered for promotion of promotion. It is submitted that itation has been made on 11/10/09 4 but even then grievance of the the nature of grievance, it would be ints No. 2 and 3 to conslder the Acct>rdingly, on a detaited representation No. 2 and 3, their claim for i|J in accordance with the existing |nce with law. If the respondents do jsetitioners' representation .or their |t wouid be open for the petitioner to r^course to such remedy as may be obser\|'ations, the petition is finally disposed Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge 5~(?