CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1227 OF 2011 :{ 1 }: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: JANUARY 21, 2011 Anuj Garg and others .....Petitioners VERSUS The Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board, Panchkula & another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. I.D.Singla, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioners are allottees of shop in Agro Mall under construction/being construed by Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board. As per the condition, possession is to be delivered within 30 days from the date of issue of allotment letter. Grievance of the petitioners is that no such possession has been handed over and even construction has not yet commenced. This action is being termed as arbitrary. Obviously, the possession of the Agro Mall can only be handed over after construction. If there is delay in CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1227 OF 2011 :{ 2 }: construction of the Mall and the petitioners are not interested or keen to have the allotment, they may approach the respondents for refund of the money if any deposited. No case for issuing writ to the respondents for completing the Agro Mall or for handing over the possession of the shop or even for refund of the amount through writ is made out. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. January 21, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE