IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25655 of 2008 MADAN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 03.09.2008 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The prayer for bail of the petitioner in a police case under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act and 3/5 of Explosive Substances Act has been rejected twice. The allegation against him is that certain demands for ransom was made from a mobile phone, sim card belongs to the petitioner. It is submitted that the sole assailant has already been enlarged on bail noticing which co-accused whose prayer for bail was rejected along with the present petitioner on 22.02.2007 have been enlarged on bail subsequently in Cr. Misc. No. 46153 of 2007. It has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 12.07.2006 and has completed the like period of custody if not more than the co- accused enlarged on bail. Considering that he is a non assailant and grant of bail to co-accused including the assailant let the petitioner, Madan Yadav be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Sikarahana at Motihari in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No. 60/2006. kksinha/ (Navin Sinha, J.)