m? ; VHIN GH COURT OF CHHA’ITISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (S! N0. 6093 of 2009 Satte Ram Mandavi State of Chhattisgarh 8a others (Writ Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shrj Satish K. Agm'hotri J.) None for the peu'tioner. Shn’ Alok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate for the respondents] State. Petitioner Versus Respondents A 0 R D E R [oran ( Passed on this 16th day ofMarch, 2010) The matter 1‘s called for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The peh‘iioner may not be interested in prosecuting the matter. In View of the foregoing, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecuiion. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge