IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO : 1704 of 2000 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated ______ in WP NO : 17800 OF 2000 on the file of the High Court.) Between: ..... APPELLANT AND .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:MR.P.VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI A N D THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN *** WRIT APPEAL NO. 1 7 0 4 OF 2000. ORAL ORDER : { Per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari}. When the matter came up for hearing, Sri P. Venugopal, the learned counsel for the appellant represented that nothing survives in the writ appeal and the same has become infructuous. Recording the above submission, the writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. ____________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J. _________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J 23-6-2008. I s L ........REGISTRAR To 1. 2.2 CD copies