IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10431 of 2009 Between: M/s. Abhinandana Stone Crusher, Enubamula Village, Atmakur (S) Mandal, Nalgonda District, represented by its Proprietor G.Animesh S/o.G.Saidulu through his G.P.A. Sri G.Saidulu S/o. G.Anjaneyulu aged 46 Yrs. Occ: Business, R/o. Kudakuda Village Chivemla Mandal, Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda. 2 The Sub-Divisional Police Officer/ Deputy Superintendent of Police, Suryapet, Nalgonda District. 3 The Station House Officer, Atmakur (S) Police Station, Atmakur (S) Mandal, Nalgonda District. 4 Gampala Sunder S/o.Ramnarsaiah R/o.Enubamula Village, Atmakur (S) Mandal, Nalgonda District. 5 Surakanti Venkat Reddy S/o.Bhadra Reddy R/o.Enubamula Village, Atmakur (S) Mandal, Nalgonda District. 6 Perumalla Kavi Raj S/o.Jeevajalam R/o.Enubamula Village, Atmakur (S) Mandal, Nalgonda District. 7 Gajavelli Venkatachary S/o.Somaiah R/o.Enubamula Village, Atmakur (S) Mandal, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.Y.NEELAKANTA RAO FOR MR.V.RAVI KIRAN RAO Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: In this Writ Petition, the petitioner claimed the following substantive relief: “to issue any appropriate Writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing Respondents 1 to 3 herein to provide necessary protection to enforce interim order, dated 19.2.2009, granted in favour of the petitioner in I.A.No.106 of 2009 in O.S.No.20 of 2009 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Suryapet, Nalgonda District in order to protect the property of the petitioner and also life and liberty of the Proprietor and GPA holder as well as the life and liberty of the workers, who are working in the petitioner-Stone Crusher by duly declaring the inaction on the part of Respondents 1 to 3 in granting Police Protection in spite of representation dt. 19.5.2009 which was filed on 20.5.2009 by the petitioner as nothing but arbitrary, illegal and practically the above mentioned interim order is ineffective apart from refusing to protect the life and liberty and also property of the petitioner as well as life and liberty of the workers, who are working in the petitioner Stone Crusher.” At the hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that as the Presiding Officer of the Civil Court is on leave, the petitioner is unable to get the order of status quo modified into one of injunction and that therefore, the petitioner is unable to pursue his prayer in the Writ Petition as of now. He, therefore, submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to it to file a fresh Writ Petition as and when the interim order of status quo is modified. The request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is accepted and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.No.13409 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 23rd July, 2009 lur