1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3706/99 Bhanwar Jalim Singh Vs. State & Anr. Date of Order : 03/03/2006 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi None for petitioner Mr. M.S. Raghaw, for respondents Undisputedly, the petitioner was not within age as per terms of advertisement dt.23rd January, 1996 issued by the RPSC for making selection for the post of Sub-Inspector. The petitioner claimed the benefit of relaxation in age in terms of Rule 11 of Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1989. The relaxation under rule referred to is admissible only to such applicants who are in service. The petitioner as per averment made in Para 3, was appointed vide order dt.2nd July, 1996. In pursuant to which, he joined on 4th July, 1996, whereas the last date of application in terms of advertisement was 23rd March, 1996, as such he was not in service when he applied for in pursuant to advertisement. In my opinion, he was not entitled to seek relaxation as provided under Rule 11 of the Rules of 1989. Consequently, I find no merit in the writ petition, the same is, accordingly, dismissed. [Ajay Rastogi],J. FRB