IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51774 of 2008 MD.SHAMIM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 30.3.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. When there are enough material to connect the petitioner on the basis of a confessional statement leading to recovery of articles from his possession and those articles have also been identified in course of Test Identification Parade, this Court would find it difficult to grant bail to the petitioner facing prosecution for an offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, namely, Md. Shamim is hereby rejected. In view of the fact that the petitioner has remained in custody only for a period of almost seven months, he may renew his prayer for bail after completing further period one year of judicial custody from today. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)