IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 24TH JANUARY 2011 / 4TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 21314 of 2010(L) ------------------------- PETITIONER : --------------------- V.K.SAROJINI, W/O.LATE MADHAVAN, VETTEKKARANGODATH HOUSE, PULAPATTA AMSOM, UMMANAZHI DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK. BY ADVS. SMT.T.D.RAJALAKSHMI SRI.R.VENUGOPAL SRI.R.SREEHARI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESNTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. 2. THE TALUK LAND BOARD, OTTAPALAM (P.O.) - 679101. 3. THE LAND TRIBUNAL, SREEKRISHNAPURAM (P.O.)-679513. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KADAMPAZHIPURAM II VILLAGE, OTTAPALAM TALUK (P.O.)-679101. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. T.K. ARAVIND KUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 21314 of 2010(L) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : PHOTOCOPY OF PURCHASE CERTIFICATE NO. 4140/76 DT. 23-7-79 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 : PHOTOCOPY OF BASIC TAX RECEIPT DT. 18-1-79 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 : PHOTOCOPY OF BASIC TAX RECEIPT DT. 18-2-97 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P4 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE CLAIM PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN CC 829/73 DT. 28-4-2010. EXT.P5 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT REPORTED IN 2000 (1) KLT 829 (SC). RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 21314 of 2010 L ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 24th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T The only request made by the petitioner in this writ petition is to direct the second respondent to consider Ext.P4 claim petition filed by the petitioner before him. 2. Now that Ext.P4 application has been filed, it is for the second respondent to consider the application in accordance with law and also adverting to Ext.P5, a judgment of the Apex Court in Ahmmedkutty Vs. Mariakutty Umma [2000 (1) KLT 829 (SC)]. This, the second respondent shall do with notice to the affected parties and as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. 3. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment and writ petition before the second respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge