THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23050 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner was employed as a clerk in Puligonda Laxmi Narasimha Swamy Temple, Gollapudi Village, Wyra Mandal, Khammam District. He was sent on deputation to Sri Laxmi Narasimha Swamy Temple, Cheruvumadaram Village, Nelakondapalli Mandal, Khammam District-3rd respondent herein. He earned promotion as Manager in that Temple. Recently, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him framing 22 charges. Through order, dated 31-10-2008, the Commissioner of Endowments, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad-2nd respondent repatriated the petitioner to his parent institution to the post of Clerk. It is stated that six charges were held to be proved and punishment of stoppage of one increment was imposed through order, dated 01-02- 2009. The petitioner submitted a representation to the 2nd respondent on 06-07-2010 with two fold reliefs. First is that he felt aggrieved by the imposition of stoppage of one increment and the second is that he wanted restoration to the post of Manager in view of the fact that the disciplinary proceedings have ended. The grievance of the petitioner is that no action has been taken by the 2nd respondent on the said representation. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Endowments and the learned Standing Counsel for Devasthanam. The petitioner is admittedly an employee of Devasthanam at Gollapudi. He was sent on deputation to the 3rd respondent Temple. He has no right to continue in that place irrespective of the fact whether or not any disciplinary proceedings were initiated. Out of the two reliefs claimed by the petitioner in his representation to the 2nd respondent, the second relief viz., restoration to the post of Manager at the 3rd respondent Temple cannot be considered at all. So far as the first relief is concerned, however, if the petitioner is able to point out any illegality in the order of punishment, necessary modification can be ordered. Hence, the writ petition is partly allowed declining the relief as to restoration to the post of Manager in the 3rd respondent Temple but directing the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate orders on the representation made by the petitioner, as to the declaring or otherwise of the punishment imposed against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 16-08-2011 Prv