FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.2025 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.144 OF 1995 -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Prothonotary’s : orders. : -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Mr.H.S.S.Murthy for the applicant in Ch/s.2025/07 Mr.R.C.Shah for the plaintiffs. Mr.R.V.More AGP for the State. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 4TH JUNE, 2008 DATED: 4TH JUNE, 2008 DATED: 4TH JUNE, 2008 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This chamber summons is taken out by the applicant-society to whom the Government vide letter dated 11.3.1985 had allotted the land admeasuring 1017 sq. mtrs. comprising of plot No.4 from layout of survey No.22 of CTS 5 of Sahar village, Taluka Andheri, Mumbai Sub-urban district. Mr.Shah, learned counsel for the plaintiffs at the outset submits that the applicant-society is not necessary party to the instant proceedings since the subject matter of the suit is different and the plot allotted to the applicant-society is independent of the suit property. In other words, he submits that the plaintiffs are not concerned with the plot of land occupied or claimed by the applicant-society in the above suit. The plaintiffs have filed affidavit stating so on 14th March, 2008 in reply to the chamber summons. In view of statement made on affidavit and across the bar by learned counsel for the plaintiffs, in my opinion, the applicant-society is not necessary party to the instant proceedings and hence the chamber summons is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)