spb/- 1 wp5807-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5807 OF 2010 Sachin Mallesh Patil & Anr. ... Petitioners. Vs. Bhimashankar Annarao Patil & Anr. ... Respondents. --- Mr Niranjan P. Shimpi for the Petitioners. Mr. Sandeep S.Salunkhe for the Respondents. ----- CORAM : D. G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 23rd NOVEMBER, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2 This writ petition arises out of an interlocutory order. The trial court as well as the lower appellate court have concurrently held that the petitioner has not made out a prima facie case and balance of convenience is in favour of the respondents. Even earlier, the Tahisildar, exercising powers under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, held against the petitioner-plaintiff and after actual site inspection, has held that there is no alternative road available to the respondent for going to his land and consequently passed an order, allowing the access. The concurrent findings of facts recorded by the courts below, require no interference by this court in exercise of writ jurisdiction. 3 The writ petition is rejected summarily. [D.G. KARNIK, J.]