THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.5080 of 2010 DT.03.12.2010 Between: Bangaru Srirama Murthy … Petitioner And Sathivilli Poorna Kamaraju … Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K.Jayashree Counsel for respondent: --- The Court made the following ORDER: ORDER: This civil revision petition is filed against order, dated 25.08.2010, in I.A.No.691 of 2010 in O.S.No.265 of 2009 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Srikakulam. I have heard Smt.K.Jayashree, learned counsel for the petitioner, and perused the record. The petitioner is the defendant in O.S.No.265 of 2009. The respondent has filed the said suit for recovery of certain amount on the basis of a pronote said to have been executed by the petitioner in the year 2002. The petitioner has filed I.A.No.691 of 2010 with a request to the Court to send the suit pronote to an expert for determination of the age of the document. Having considered the respective pleas of the parties, the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Srikakulam, vide order, dated 25.08.2010, dismissed the I.A. At the hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as it is the pleaded case of the petitioner that during the lifetime of the father of the respondent, the petitioner has repaid the amount and that as the suit pronote executed in the year 2002 was not returned by his father, the respondent taking advantage of the said situation, filed the suit with a false claim that the pronote was executed on 30.06.2007. One of the reasons assigned by the Court below for rejecting this application is that the petitioner has not denied his signature on the suit pronote, which implies that the pronote would have been executed in the year 2007. At any rate, these aspects need to be adjudicated in the suit. Having considered the reasons assigned by the Court below, I do not find any error of jurisdiction for this Court to interfere in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the civil revision petition, C.R.P.M.P.No.6753 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) Date: 03.12.2010. VGB