IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1865 of 2010 KAPILDEO PRASAD YADAV, son of Late Bipat Yadav, resident of Village Rahimpur Nanhku Mandal Tola, P.O. Durgapur, P.S. Muffasil, District Khagaria. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Under Secretary to the Government of Bihar, Finance Department, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna. 5. The District Superintendent of Education, Lakhisarai. 6. The District Provident Fund Officer, Lakhisarai. 7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Halsi, Lakhisarai. 8. The Headmaster, Astronnat Middle School Bahchha, Anchal Halsi, District Lakhisarai. 9. The Headmaster, Janta High School, Mansi, Khagaria. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 3.2.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of difference of salary with effect from 10th of February, 1972 to 31st of March, 1973 which was deposited in his G.P.F. account along with dearness allowance for the period 1974 to April, 1977. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall be considered as per law without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh 2 representation before the District Superintendent of Education, Lakhisarai (respondent no.5). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, respondent no.5 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner raised in his representation could be redressed and the admitted dues, if any, could also be paid with statutory interest without further delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)