1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application No. 1109/2008 Tirora Irrigation Sub-Division, thr. S.D.O.& ors..vs.. Tikaram Ghusi Kalsarpe & Ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 13 th February, 2008 1. Heard. 2. This application is filed by the petitioners for condonation of delay of seven days' in filing Misc. Civil Application (restoration) St. No. 1763/2008. The aforesaid M. C. A. was filed for restoration of the Writ Petition St. No. 7714/2007. The Registry of this Court rejected the registration of the aforesaid writ petition for non removal of the office objection. 3. In that view of the matter, for the purpose of disposal of this civil application, the respondents are not required to be heard. 4. For the reasons stated in the application delay of 2 seven days in filing Misc. Civil Application St. No. 1763/2008 is condoned. The application stands disposed of accordingly. Misc. Civil Application (Restoration) St, No. 1763/2008 1. Heard. 2. The M.C.A. is taken out for restoration of the writ petition. The Registry of this Court refused registration of the aforesaid writ petition for failure of the petitioners to remove the Office objection. 3. In that view of the matter, for the purpose of disposal of this civil application, the respondents are not required to be heard. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that objection is regarding filing of power on behalf of petitioner Nos. 2 to 4. The statement on affidavit is made by the Executive Engineer, Gondia Irrigation Division, Gondia that the learned counsel has filed power on his behalf and on behalf of petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 along with 3 letter issued by the State Government authorising the petitioner No. 1 Sub Divisional Engineer therefor. 5. In that view of the matter, Mr. Jagtap, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Office objection be dispensed with and the writ petition be restored to file. 6. Since the power of petitioner No. 1 is filed for himself and on behalf of petitioner Nos. 2 to 4, office objection regarding power on behalf of petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 is waived and the petition is restored to file. 7. The Misc. Civil Application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. JUDGE kahale