IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 24TH KARTHIKA 1933 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2732 of 2003(C) ------------------------------- ( CRA.114/1996 OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC) FAST TRACT COURT II, PATHANAMTHITTA) CC.229/1994 OF JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, RANNI REVN. PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED: PHILIP, S/O. TITUS, CHERUKARAYIL HOUSE, MADAMON, PERUNAD. BY ADV. SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEW RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:: STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. S. HYMA. THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.S. GOPINATHAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = CRL.R.P. 2732 OF 2003 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 15th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2011. J U D G M E N T The revision petitioner is the accused in C.C. 229 of 1994 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranni. He was convicted by the learned Magistrate for offence under Sections 447, 354 and 323 IPC. Though he preferred Crl. Appeal 114 of 1996 before the Sessions Judge, Pathanamthitta, he was not successful. Assailing the above conviction and sentence as confirmed in appeal, this revision petition was filed. The revision petitioner filed a petition as Crl. M.A. 9790 of 2011 under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking permission to compound the offence. The petition is signed by the revision petitioner as well as the defacto complainant Smt. Marykkutty Samuel. Both of them are present. Having heard either side and perusing the petition, I find no reason to reject the same. Hence the petition is recorded and the revision petitioner would stand acquitted under Section 320(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Bail bond executed by the petitioner shall stand cancelled. P.S. GOPINATHAN, (JUDGE) KNC/-