MC 3077/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY HON’BLE MR JUSTICE A.K. GOSWAMI Heard Mr. A. Matlib, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. D eka, learned State Counsel and Mr. A.K. Sikdar, learned counsel for the opposit e party No. 5 to 11. On a scrutiny of the order sheets and the office notes it transpires tha t inspite of the order dated 11.11.2010 fresh steps for service of notice on the opposite party Nos. 3 and 6 have not been taken by the applicant. When confront ed, learned counsel prays for little accommodation. List again on 11.2.2011. By then, the applicant would take steps to cause dusti service on these respondents. The process should be routed through the office of the Court. On the next date, the applicant would file an affidavit to that effect. It is made clear, that if by the next date fixed, the steps required are not taken by the applicant, this application would be considered on merit and d isposed of on that day.