1 CA 578/2010 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 578 OF 2010 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 572 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Ms. Deepa Matwani i/b Mr. S.D. Patil for the applicant. Mr. A.B. Tajane for respondent no.1. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 3RD MARCH 2011 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2. This application is made by the revision applicant (original defendant) for amendment of the written statement. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the amendment sought to be added by paragraphs 7A to 7C are subsequent 2 CA 578/2010 events which have taken place after the decision of the trial Court. Hence, they could not be pleaded in the written statement filed before the trial Court. On being asked the date or at least the month or the year in which the alleged event happened, learned counsel for the applicant is unable to state when the alleged events occurred except to say that these events are subsequent events. It was necessary for the applicant to point out that the events are really subsequent events in order to consider his request for amendment. There is nothing on record to show that the events are subsequent events. In the circumstances, the civil application is rejected. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)