IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6296 of 2011 1. DEVPUJANI DEVI, WIFE OF MOHAFIL RAUT 2. URMILA KUMARI, DAUGHTER OF MOHAFIL RAUT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsels for the Informant and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that it is not a case under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code which would raise a presumption against the accused persons as also that the petitioners are the mother-in-law and the sister-in-law of the deceased having no specific overt act alleged against them. Considering the same, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with three sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran, Chapra, in Taraiya P.S. Case No. 97 of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if 2 the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)