IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 2319 of 2010(O&M) Vinod Rathi .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr.Sandeep Kotla, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shruti Jain, AAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Case property in this case is liquor. Even if the liquor is released on sapurdari to the petitioner as prayed for by him on the ground that he is the owner, perhaps it will have to be on the condition that the case property is kept in the same condition for being produced before the Court at the relevant time. Consequence of this would be that if liquor even released on sapurdari, will be kept in the same condition as it is lying in the Police Station. No useful purpose would be served in such a case to release this case property to the petitioner on sapurdari. The prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner that he may be permitted to sell this liquor and deposit the sale proceeds with the Court, can not be acceptable because it is the case property, which is material and required by the Court and not the value thereof. The case property after disposal of the case, shall be released in accordance with law. No case for interference as such is made out. Dismissed. November 18, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE