^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. of2004 PETITIONER: Gajendra Das Bairagi, son of Shri Baijnath Das Bairagi, aged 53 years, Assistant Teacher, resident of Village Bamhani, Block Development Duldula, District Jashpur. Versus RESPONDENTS: \^^ t^y ^f@v '^f ^2 -••~.^'. ^^ _..•*" ^<^> ><>•' ""•-s; ^"^Sh. -•\Q \ ^ State of Chhattisgarh, Throuph: The Secretary, Ministry Scheduled Caste 8s Scheduled Tribes, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Assistant Oommissioner, (Adim Jati Kalyaan), Jaspur. The Collector, (Adim Jati Kalyaan), Jashpur. _4. 'Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Bamhani, Block ? Oevelopment Duldula, • District Jashpur. !^.' " is ^i ^....i -,'<&^ j' :'r ^ J~^ A~ </ ; . ^ y WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICL'ES 226 8s 22/7" OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN -THE NATURE O.F MANDAMUS. CERTORARI AND /OR ORDER(S) AND /OR DIRECTION(S) .1N THE NATURE OF WRITS The humble petition of the petitioner above named. MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: l^ Particulars of the netltinnor- -_ XI-HC-22 ?5? •<II<<IM<I, g-rflu'le, (stciitiy 3TT^1 *ii*<wrawi^ i?T':racf» ^.^.^,.i.^..9-^l6^ sn^rw R-li*3I1^T SblitiBfeT 311^1 6WIWflf?!T qii<ilci<11-f iiHfiTfftelifl <Ri'wi< ^ari^ran^T Petitioner bv Shri B. P.1 Respondents No. 1, 2 Bv fhe iastant Constitution of India, the. legalit\r of the order ainendiae the earlier orderl petitioner has been post) Developiaent Block - Fars; teacher ia ttte Prixaarv 3 Duldula, District - Jashpiir. the vfllage- Bamh.ni, the bowever vide order dated reiastated and he was po| DeveloDinent Block - Duld4 order dt. 22.4.2004 has posted at Prim.ary School^ Farsabaliar. Leanied coiinsel for ttik a sincere teacher and eyen ftierefore he was reiiistated niav be aUowed to make a rei ftie Respondent No.2 may tji leamed counsel for the State) Havin.g heard leamed t to fhe facts and circiimstaridi Shanaa, Advocate. 4> 3 by SbriU- N, S. Deo, Govt. Advocate. pet^tion under Ai-ticle 226/227 of the pe^itioner has quesfioned tlie propriety and datejd 7.5.2004 (Annexure P/1) whereby dated 22.4,2004 ( AimexTire P/2) the ;d at Prim.an7 School Ghasuaiuida, (bahar. The petitioner was working as ;hool Raideeh, Developiuent Block |0n receiviug coiaplamts from vfllagers of p4titioner was placed under siispension, 22.4.2004 ( Annexure P/2) be was ijsted at Pruaan' School - Dhotmiara, p.a. Now, vide order napugned fhe said amended and fhe petitioaer has been Ghasitnuiida, Development Block - petitioner sybiaits fhat fbe petitioner is tjlie complaiuts were not found to be false |aud in. fhe circunistances ttie petitioner lireseutatiou to the Respondent No.2 and. directed to decide the saine, to whicb has no objection. ^•ounsel for the parties aad haviag regard as ri-ftlte <-asp ihf pp.titiQTlfT is a11owed to (di^i^tt___ XI-HC-22 3^ 'tiwici^, sTnu'is, Ridiuy Sii^i ^ach II*IMI a>*l|th •"""""""""" W^ 200 Rl'b^ sn^rw R-ii+SII^T sPlWHf^cT 3n^T?%w<ifer ^ abd inake a detailed representatioi period of 10 days from. today decide the representation wifhi4 fhe date of receipt of such repr| raised by the petitioner in the i\ order ia accoi'dance with law. Witli ttte above observatiotis Consequently M(W)P No. Parties are entitled for ceilti&ed <»ii<ifa<fl'iiiH<-ii fftec&<Ri(<ii< ^isri^iran^r to the Respondent No.2 wifhin a hi tum fhe Respondent No.2 wfll a further peqod of one nionfh, froin :sentation, considering aU. the poiats ;presentation, b.y passing a reasoued this petition is disposed offinally, 246/2004 stands disposed of. copy ofttiis oKler. Sd/- , L.C.BHADOO Judge dfi^tel c»;a-., :-^»*-