1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICGTION SUIT NO. 4461 OF 1994 Ambika Properties Pvt. Ltd. ... Plaintiffs vs. Smt. Laxmibai J. Rajput and ors. . . . ... Defendants Mr. Arup Dasgupta i/b. R.Narula for plaintiffs Ms. Mangal Shinde i/b. Basant Trilokani & Co. for defendant nos. 10 and 10(a) Mr. V. T. Lulia for defendant no.29. CORAM: A. S. AGUIAR J. Date: December, 13, 2004 P.C. Learned Advocate for plaintiffs and defendant nos. 10, 10(a) and 29 state that the parties have settled their dispute and file the consent terms. Consent terms duly signed by the parties and their advocates dated 12th September 2003 and consent terms dated 19th April 2002 between the plaintiffs and defendant no.29, taken on record and marked 'X'-1 and 'X-2' , respectively, for identification. Defendant nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19 had entered into consent terms with the plaintiffs which wee filed on 2nd May 2002, while defendant no.23, a minor through guardian had filed consent terms with the plaintiffs on 17th July 2002 and thereafter defendant nos. 27 and 28 had filed consent terms with the plaintiffs on 7th March 2003. 2 On filing of the said consent terms suit disposed of as far as the aforesaid defendants are concerned. In view of the consent terms now filed suit as against defendant nos. 10, 10A and 28 stands disposed of with no order as to costs. Refund as per rules. C. C. expedited. (A. S. AGUIAR J.) the (A. S. AGUIAR J.)