IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 22279 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 18.10.2011 Raman Kumar Gulati ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. S.K. Sandhir, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. …… RAJESH BINDAL, J. While issuing notice of motion on 26.07.2011, following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner were noticed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in terms of the allegations in the FIR, yarn was entrusted to the petitioner in December, 2009 for fabrication of cloth to be returned within a fortnight but the same was not returned. The present FIR was got registered by the complainant on July 09, 2011. In fact, in regular course of business, the petitioner has been receiving yarn from the complainant and delivering the fabricated cloth or the left over yarn. In case there is any difference, the matter could be sorted out. It cannot be said to be a case of cheating.” Learned counsel for the State submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required. Considering the aforesaid fact, interim bail granted to the petitioner on 26.07.2011, is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 18.10.2011 sharmila