HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.25737 of 2008 Date: 08-9-2011 Between K.Ramadas and another … Petitioners and The Inspector of Police/SHO, Kukatpally PS, Cyberabad, Hyderabad and another … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.25737 of 2008 Order: This writ petition is filed with the prayer, which reads as under: To issue a Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent harassing the petitioners without any complaint or crime against the petitioners is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st respondent not interfere with the liberty of the petitioners. 2. It is the case of the petitioners that the 2nd petitioner is the wife of the 1st petitioner and they have borrowed an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- by way of hand-loan from the 2nd respondent in the month of September, 2008 for meeting their business and they have repaid an amount of Rs.1,75,000/-. It is the grievance of the petitioners that for recovery of the balance amount and also further amounts, at the instance of the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent is interfering with the lives and liberty of the petitioners and insisting to repay the balance amount. It is also alleged that on 18-11-2008 the 1st respondent called the petitioners to the police station and forcibly obtained four signed empty cheques from the 2nd petitioner along with two signed and unfilled promotes. 3. The 1st respondent-Inspector of Police, Kukatpally Police Station, has filed a Counter-Affidavit. There is no counter by the 2nd respondent. In the counter filed by the 1st respondent, while denying the various allegations made by the petitioners, he has categorically denied the allegation of the petitioners that at the instance of Sri S.K.Jaya Chandra, Director General of Police, Vigilance and Enforcement Cell, Hyderabad, who is related to the 2nd respondent, they are interfering with the lives and liberty of the petitioners. It is categorically stated that there is no complaint by the 2nd respondent before the Police and they have not called the petitioners to the police station on 18-11-2008 and obtained four signed empty cheques and unfilled pronotes, as alleged. 4. Except the allegations of the petitioners, there is no other material in support of the case of the petitioners. As it is stated in the counter that they are not interfering with the lives and liberty of the petitioners and no case is registered against the petitioners, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, placing on record the statement of the 1st respondent that there is no complaint against the petitioners and there is no interference with the lives and liberty of the petitioners by the respondents. 5. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J. 08th September, 2011. Ak HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.25737 of 2008 08th September, 2011. (Ak)