'sssss^^- ® IN THEt-tIGH COURTOFJUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fC.G.) W. P. (S) NoJ^fo /2006 PETmONES RESPONDEN75 -j-:.|0'^ ^N^ ^^^ ^y/ /t^.7 ^ /2iW...- /-w .^^y ^^9^ c^' ..>< ^/ Ishwardin Tiwari, Aged about 50 years, S/o Late Shri Ram Pratap Tiwari, R/o - J. K. D. Road, Manendragarh, Distt. - Koria (C.G.) VERSUS~^J 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. <T' Chhttisgarh Electricity Board, Through : The Chairman, C. G. E. B. Daganiya, Raipur, Tah. & Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) The Divisional Engineer (O. & M.D.N.) Chhattisgarh Electricity Board, Champa;Distt.-Janjgir-Champa(C.G.) The Divisional Engineer (O, & M.) Chhattisgarh Electricity Board, Ambikapur, Distt. - Ambikapur (C.G.) The Superintending Engineer (LC) Chhttisgarh Electricity Board, Tifra, Bilaspur, Distt. - Bilaspur (C.G.) The Assistant Engineer, Chhatfisgarh Electricity Board, Manendragarh, Distt. - Koria (C.G.) Vtfrit Petition UnderArtiGtes 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India XI-HC-78 3ST '^WWf, »Tfl«'l<»,RtCll'My< Uf .?.&CLo *T1H?II **11<»i .?.£>. WT 200 3TT^?T <4a<»> (lclt^slS,]ST) sn^rqirf^iR! crar 3i7??T aiifw c- K Roshafi/- STaRKHfNsn^r ^ ^ ^ °fir<<Ici4)-i *<iH<il ffte^l'iRi't^it ^srf^irsn^T 25.7.2006 Heord Mr. Bha'at R<yput, A^vocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satish fiupta, Deputy So^ermnent Advocate for* the State. The moin grievance raised Vy the petitioner in this petition is that in the year 1974 he wos appointed Labourer in the respondent-office nome of the petitioner appears at as daily wage employee on the post of Vide order dated 30.3.1980 (Armexure P/l) the respondents regularized ^3 employees aid in the said order the ierial No. 19, but the petitioner has not been grmted benefit, as granted ^o other employees under the said order. The petitioner has also not been gr^inted the consequential benefits. Learned counsel for the pet made several representations to r'epr'esentation to respondent No.2 Itioner submitted that the petitioner has Mie respondents, but nothin9 has been heard till today, therefore, the pe'tftioner may be allowed to make a detailed aid in turn, he be directed to decide the same in (iccordance with law. The prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner- appea's to be just, fair and reasonable, therefoi^e, without expressing any opinion on the merit of case, the petitioner is dit^ected to make a detailed representation along with copy of this petition to ^espondent No.2 raising dl his points and in turn, respondent No. 2 is direct^d to decide the same within a period of three months in accordance with 14w after considering all the points raised by the petitioner. With direction aforesaid,th Certified copy as per rules. ^ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.