ozanacu ETI TI ONER 3 OShan Lal, Agarwal. / So Late Budhram Agarwal, aged about 47 years, R/o Kirodimal Clany, Raig arh . Vr - " esus ' RESPOWENS {-1. Registrar Public Trust. T istrict— Raigarh . 2 . The Collector /Raig arh . 3. Seth Kirodimal Dharmada Trust, Raigarh. District- Rai 5/. WRIT PETITION UmER ART‘ICIE 22627 ,OF THE CONSTITUTION OF II‘EIA FOR ISSUANC ' A SUITABLE ’WRIT’. ORDER ’OR DIRECTION . aoaoeo¥mn q . / \ g /2 E OF XE~HCv22 WWW wP}m§// EH“! i ‘ QEma" ,‘ W 29m mg mmw‘w wwmw§%®m $W$Hé$1 Ii§£7i270U§§ 8hri B.D.Guru for the petitiom:T . Shri Railbir Singh; Govt. Advoibate, for respondents No. 1 85 2. Heard. . y Though this matter is listeéi 1’ ”131mm of controvarsy involvad and beunsel for the petitioner, this p6 admission stage. Atlmi‘itedly, the ps‘m'tionm is balonging to fly: Seth Kirodimed D oasis of a reimrt that the petitioner" { Ni‘thout permission, the Registrar; I occupying a part of the premises harmada Chaiitahie Trust. 011 the Has carrying on construction activity ’ubh'c Trust] respondent No, 1 issued ‘a notice to the petitioner to Show ( F ‘wken against him and he be evicte On receiving the notice, the petitio the laridlord could not evict the Registrar, Public Trust not being oetitioher, who was a tenant of the ‘ 3 ‘or admission, in véew of the limited in View of the prayer 0f the leaJhed pti‘dOn is being disposed of at the 'ause Why appropriate action be not. d from the house in his occupation. tier submitted an objectioh that the. x Frust, This objection was submitted ion i 20/9] 2001. it is the case of the lietitioner that Without considering t i i I 1 ,, _ ‘ t [n , ... 2:— the said objection the resporident Ncii. 1 is threatening him with evictiom in View of the fact and cii‘cunistances on record and the objection / ~1a‘11hmitteeieheforethe~-resiaenéentmnei1_,—Whiohr~e—lateséo—thegetnisdon of \ ieti 4“r XnEC-QZ E wéwm W‘L‘QLN‘sggkyLtXJWK 2%, mg § mmmw (—L/’ l :emfazfm WW %v*l WK a; afan 311%? The lespondent no. 1 to evict the petitioner from the premises in question, 11‘s Court thinks it proper to dispo a without enteiing iiito the merits of the CaSG. disposed ofby directing respondent 3.1 to dispose of the objection r‘iied by the petitionei‘ expeditiously feferably within a penlod of Six wm ‘der. The petitioner shall appear L‘2 f7,"2002, 011 which dam th€ sai beguijlg the p€titi0ner and fhcreaftsr, OT aj so not in ail}; Way cany on any add question without due permission from the competent authority. it is made Clear that the Court is not expressing any opinion on the m arit$ of the objections raised by tho only coniined to quick cliSposal of tho said objsctions. 1s‘ A copy of the ordtrr b6 handed over to the Stato Counsel. Certified copy as per rules, Accordingiy, m6 wri‘t petition is )j6ction £11 accordance with law. In ‘se of the Wn't petition at the stage :ks from the date of receipt of the before the respondent no.1 on i respondent Shall fix a date for he shall proceed to dispose of the the meantimethe petitioner shall itional alteration in the premises in petitioner and the direction herein Sd/— P.C-Naik Judge ‘ :