IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 8097 of 2009 Between: Yenugupalli Aruna, W/o. Yenugupalli Vijaya Kumar, Bendapudi (V), Thondangi (M), East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, Sarpavaram Police Station, East Godavari District. 2 The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an Order, direction, or a Writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the Respondents herein to produce the Petitioner's brother-in-law namely Yenugupalli Vijaya Kumar, S/o. Arjuna Rao, R/o. Bendapudi, Thondangi Mandal, East Godavari District, before this Court, who was illegally detained Station House Officer, Sarpavaram Police Station at about 12.00 P.M. on 14/04/2009 and apprehending danger to his life and set him at liberty forthwith and to pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: TELEGRAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 8097 of 2009 ORAL ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) A Telegram dated 15.04.2009 sent by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to produce her brother-in-law viz., Yenugupalli Vijaya Kumar, S/o Arjuna Rao, R/o Bendapudi, Thondangi Mandal, East Godavari District, who was illegally detained by the police, before this Court and set him at liberty, is taken up as writ petition. The 1st respondent filed a counter-affidavit stating that the alleged detenu is neither required nor wanted in connection with any other crime and if at all the alleged detenu is required in connection with any crime, the 1st respondent will take appropriate action in accordance with law. It is also submitted across the Bar by the learned Advocate General that the alleged detenu has not been detained in connection with any crime. In view of the above submission of the learned Advocate-General, we feel that no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. _________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari __________________________ Justice B. Chandra Kumar Date: 06.05.2009 Nn/gurc THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 8097 of 2009 (Order delivered by the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) 6.5.2009