IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL No. 339 OF 2004 Rama A. Kamble APPELLANT Vs. Krishna A. Kamble RESPONDENT Mr. P. D. Dalvi, Advocate for Appellant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. J. J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 11, 2006. : JULY 11, 2006. : JULY 11, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for Appellant. Both the Trial Court and the Lower Appellate Court have concurrently held that appellant does not have any title to the property and also both the Courts below have concurrently held that Respondent was not licensee of the Appellant and as such relief of possession was declined by both the Courts. There is no substantial question of law involved in this appeal. Hence, appeal stands dismissed. [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]