IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-29524 of 2009 Date of Decision: November 4, 2009 Gagan Chopra and others … Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present : Mr. Deepak Sibal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. B.B.S. Teji, AAG, Punjab. S.D. Anand, J.(Oral) Reply filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 4 is taken on record. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, dismissed the anticipatory bail of the petitioners as infructuous, in view of the report furnished by the Police of Police Station Division No.7, Ludhiana, that there was neither any case registered against the petitioners nor any application was pending against them in that police station. The learned State counsel, under instructions from SI Rajinder Singh, informs that there indeed a complaint against the petitioners which is under investigation at the hands of the Women Cell. The learned State counsel further Crl. Misc. No. M-29524 of 2009 informs that the Investigating Agency has not yet made up its mind whether to frame charge on the petitioners or not. The petition shall stand disposed of with a direction that as and when the investigating agency makes up its mind to charge the petitioners, the latter will give three days notice to the petitioners to have recourse to the law. November 4, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2