IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52345 of 2008 SUNIL MAHTO Son of Shiv Dayal Mahto, Resident of Village- Karaitar, P.S. Bakhri, District- Begusarai. --------------Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR -----------------Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 9.2.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 25(1- B) A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that neither anything was recovered from the possession of the petitioner nor the petitioner arrested at the place of occurrence. However, in the F.I.R. it has been stated that the petitioner was one of the person who managed to escape from the place of occurrence. In the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. P. Kumar (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)