IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2605 of 2009 1.BHOLA SAO son of late Munshi Sao 2.Mannu Sao son of Bhola Sao 3.Mintu Kumar, son of Bhola Sao. All residents of Mohalla-Abghila, Devi Asthan, P.S.Muffasil, District- Gaya. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 8.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners pray for anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 376,323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation of rape is only against co-accused Rajesh Sao. It is not alleged that these petitioners were accompanying him at the said time, rather the allegation against these petitioners is that subsequently the mother of the informant went to the father of co- accused Rajesh Sao, namely, petitioner No.1, where he and his sons abused and assaulted her. It is further submitted that the petitioners were granted anticipatory bail by the Sessions Court itself but after submission of charge sheet the same has been rejected. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that the petitioners (1) Bhola Sao, (2) Mannu Sao and (3) Mintu Kumar in the event of their arrest or surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri A.K. Gupta, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class in connection with Trial 2 No.1896/2008, arising out of Muffasil P.S. Case No. 161/2008, subject to the other applicable conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.)