IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 5TH APRIL 2011 / 15TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 7767 of 2011(U) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ LONAKUTTY, MALIYEKKAL VEEDU, KODASSERY P.O., NAYARAGANDI. BY ADVS. SRI.V.V.SURESH SRI.C.BHASKARAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, TRIVANDRUM-695 001. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, THRISSUR-680 001. 3. THE DISTRICT ANIMAL WELFARE OFFICER, THRISSUR-680 001. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.7767 OF 2011(U) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of April, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner claims to be an agriculturist, who had also established a poultry farm. According to the petitioner, during the rainy season of 2010, his poultry shed collapsed and as a result of which huge loss was caused. He states that the 3rd respondent sent a report to the revenue authorities explaining the loss suffered by the petitioner and by Ext.P2 he was informed that his claim has been forwarded to the District Collector for considering and passing orders. According to the petitioner, thereafter there was no progress in the matter and as a result of which he made Ext.P3 representation to the District Collector requesting that he should be suitably compensated in the light of Ext.P2 and the report of the 3rd respondent. It is stated that there was no response to Ext.P3 and thereupon he approached this court by filing this writ petition. 2. Even going by the pleadings in the writ petition, the main grievance of the petitioner is that there was no response to Ext.P3 representation made by him. Therefore at this stage, what is WPC.No. 7767/2011 :2 : required is that the 2nd respondent should consider Ext.P3 in the light of Ext.P2 referred to above and pass orders thereon. This the 2nd respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 8 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/