IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.p.(,su No. 33 OH /2oo9 *éeeta é‘ingh, D/ o Shri Ram Vishal Singh, Aged about 50 years, R/o Geetanjali Nagar, Karbala Road, Bilaspur-(C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. {’State ofChhattisgarh, Through — The Secretary, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. é, Joint Secretary, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur—(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER To A J HEGEE sQEERT m: CHHA‘W§$QH A? B§LAS§$E§R (Wm. Mr. Justiae PrEtinker Diwakei’) Wa‘it Peiiiiion ($) No. 33047 of 2M9 F’E‘E‘ITMNER Geeta Singh VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh and another Shri SunH Otwani , counsel for the petitioner. Shri Y‘S. Thakur, Dy. AG. 8: Ms. Sunita Jain, PL for the respondents/State. WRET PETRTSON UNDER ARTECLE 22$ OF THE CONSTiTUTmN OF SNBIA RESPONDEMTS oRnER (1a.o7.20a39) finany. Wiih the consent of the counsei for the names, the matter is heard Chailenge in the instant petition is to the order No. F 1-18/2009/38— t, Raipur (dated — nil) (Annexure P-t) passed by respondent Not whereby the petittoner was transferred from Govt. Giris’ Poet Graduate Cottege, Biiaspur to Govt. Coliege Kharod, District Janjgtr. Grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has hardiy compieted a pertod of one year at the present place of posting. Counsei tor the petitioner submits that at the present piece of posttng the petitioner had hardiy remained fer one year and therefore the transfer order is against the transfer policy of the State Government. He however submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with tiberty to make representation. He atso seeks a direction to the authorities concerned to decide the said representation exp‘edttioueiy. To this prayer ot the petitioner, counsei for the respondents/State has no objection. Aooordingiy, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with tiberty as aforesaid. if the petitioner makes a representation within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same woutd he decided by the authorities concerned within a further period of three weeks from‘the date of its receipt strictiy in accordance with taw. Titt then the order impugned shait not be given effect to. L .t Pritinker Diwaker Judge ,_ Sd/- \ \