IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 16878 of 2002 BETWEEN: Doddapaneni Venkatarao, S/o Venkateswarlu, R/o Ramalingeswarapet, Tenali, Guntur District. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District. 2 The Circle Inspector of Police, Vemuru Police Station Vemuru, Guntur District. 3 The Sub Inspector of Police, Vemuru Police Station Vemuru Guntur District. 4 Sri Gali Koteswararao, S/o Venkatapathi, R/o Butumilli Vemuru Mandal, Guntur District. 5 Smt. Siva Parvathi, W/o Ravinder, Butumilli, Vemuru Mandal, Guntur District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 1 to 3 in harassing the petitioner without registering any criminal case and forcing the petitioner to pay the false claims of the 4th and 5th respondents and even without verifying the accounts of the unregistered partnership firm; as illegal arbitrary and without jurisdiction; and consequentially direct the Respondents 1 to 3 not to interfere with the personnel liberty of the petitioner Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The allegations made by the petitioner that the respondents 1 to 3 are harassing him without registering any criminal case and forcing him to pay false claims of the unofficial respondents 4 and 5 have been denied in the counter stating that there is no complaint against the petitioner and the police never harassed him or interfered with his life and liberty. 2. In view of the aforesaid categorical denial of the averments of the petitioner, I am of the opinion that no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J April 2, 2008 DSK