((-1-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1351 OF 2008 Ms.Maria Monica Susairaj Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.G.R.Agrawal for petitioner. Mr.P.G.Sarda for respondent no.2. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, APP for the State. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND A.A.KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATE : 22nd October 2008 PC : 1. This petition is by an accused woman in a murder case with accusations attracting sections 302, 201 and 34 of Indian Penal Code vide CR No.347 of 2008. The alleged incident wherein a male person died took place on 7th May 2008. The petitioner as also the co-accused, who is another male person, were arrested on 21st August 2008. 2. The petitioner filed an application seeking bail being Bail Application No.1196 of 2008. Pending this bail application, the petitioner filed an application at Exhibit-4 therein ((-2-)) seeking a direction to the jail authorities to produce the petitioner before the Judge hearing the bail application on the date of hearing of the bail application. The learned Special Judge, Greater Mumbai by impugned order dated 19th June 2008 was pleased to reject this application Exhibit-4. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the aforesaid order dated 19th June 2008 whereby her application below Exhibit-4, pending her bail application, has been dismissed. 3. This very petitioner had filed another application before the learned Judge on 12th June 2008 seeking to furnish a copy of her alleged confessional statement recorded u/s 164 by the Judicial Magistrate to effectively prosecute her bail application. This application of the petitioner also came to be rejected by the learned Judge on 19th June 2008. The petitioner, therefore, had preferred Criminal Writ Petition No.1307 of 2008 in this Court. 4. Pending Writ Petition No.1307 of 2008, when the matter was placed before us on 16th July ((-3-)) 2008, we had passed interim order directing the learned Sessions Judge to dispose off the bail application of the petitioner on merits. We had also issued certain directions in that regard, which are not relevant for this order. 5. The bail application of the petitioner was heard by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai and the same has been rejected on 25th July 2008. 6. In our opinion, in view of rejection of the original bail application itself filed by the petitioner, the present writ petition seeking an order directing the petitioner to remain present at the time of hearing of the bail application does not survive. 7. In the light of the aforesaid subsequent development that has taken place pending this writ petition, as the sole relief claimed in the petition does not survive, this petition is dismissed as infructuous. (A.A.KUMBHAKONI, J.) (BILAL NAZKI, J.)