IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22184 of 2011 Palat Rai Versus The State Of Bihar ------- 02/ 09.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. It would appear from perusal of the impugned order that earlier petitioner was granted provisional bail by learned Ist Addl. Sessions Judge in B.P. No. 430/2009 vide order dated 8.1.2010 and the aforesaid bail was confirmed on 20.4.2010 with condition that if the case is proceeded on protest or otherwise, on any ground, bail petition of the petitioner would be considered afresh. It would further appear from perusal of the record that the petitioner is not named in the first information report and after investigation, police submitted final form showing case true but no clue. It appears that the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate took cognizance for the offence against the petitioner. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner points out that only material, which has come against the petitioner, is that he was seen near the place of the occurrence. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Palat Rai, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha (West Champaran) in Gobardhana P.S. Case no. 27/2009. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)