IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 24TH BHADRA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 5497 of 2010(D) ------------------------------------------ (CR. NO.27/2010 OF EXCISE RANGE, KOLLENGODE) ......... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.3,4 AND 5: ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOJAN, S/O.BABU, ARACKAL HOUSE, CHEMMANGAMKANDAM, PUTHUR, THRISSUR. 2. P.M.SIVAKUMAR, S/O.MANI, DOOR NO.1773, THADAKAM ROAD, VELANDIPALAYAM, COIMBATORE. 3. RENISH, S/O.BHASHEER, PADUVINKAL HOUSE, PULIPARAMBU, OLLUKKARA, MANNUTHY, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.SOORAJ T.ELENJICKAL. RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: -------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, THROGH EXCISE INSPECTOR, EXCISE RANGE, KOLLENGODE, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/09/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. V. RAMKUMAR, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bail Application No.5497 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATED: 15th day of September, 2010 O R D E R Petitioners, who are accused Nos.3, 4 and 5 in Cr.No.27/2010 of Kollengode Excise Range for offences punishable under Sections 55 (a) and (d) of the Abkari Act, for having been found in possession of 1184 liters of spirit on 21.7.2010, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. I am not satisfied that both the grounds enumerated under Clause (b)(ii) of Sec. 41 A of the Abkari Act are present in this case so as to justify the release of the petitioners on bail. This Application is accordingly dismissed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. dmb