IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2010 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(Crl.).No. 102 of 2010(S) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- BIJU K., S/O. KOCHUPILLA, AGED 36 YEARS, RETNAVILASAM, KODANNUR, CHANNAPETTA P.O., PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POLICE STATION, ANCHAL, KOLLAM. 3. RAJAN, AGED ABOUT 60, PUTHENVEEDU, VADAKKUMKARA EAST, UMAYANELLOOR, MYANADU VILLAGE, KOLLAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.K.PUSHPALATHA. R3 BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPCRL.102/2010 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1.TRUE COPY OF MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE DATED 4.12.2008 ISSUED FROM SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE, ANCHAL. EXT.P2.TRUE COPY PETITION IN OP NO.69/2009 OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOTTARAKKARA. EXT.P3.TRUE COPY OF PETITION IN OP NO.107/09 OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOTTARAKKARA. EXT.P4.TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 21.1.2009 IN WPC NO.1859/09 OF THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA. EXT.P5. TRUE COPY OF MEDICAL CERTIFICATE DATED 6.4.09 ISSUED FROM PARAKKAT MEDICAL TRUST HOSPITAL, ANCHAL. EXT.P6.TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 7.4.09 IN OP NO.69/09. EXT.P7.TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 7.4.09 IN OP NO.107/09. EXT.P8.TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 28.7.09 SENT BY THE PETITIONER. K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(Crl.) No.102 of 2010-S ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 6th April, 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. In this writ petition a writ of Habeas Corpus is sought for production of the wife of the petitioner. Today, the alleged detenu, the petitioner and the parents of the alleged detenu were present. We interacted with the alleged detenu, the petitioner and also the parents of the alleged detenu. The alleged detenu would state that she is not under any illegal detention. But, she would state that, today she would like to go with the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of permitting the alleged detenu to go with the petitioner. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS