IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 26602 of 2011 Date of decision: 18.10.2011 Balwinder Singh petitioner vs State of Punjab respondent Present:- Mr. HS Batth, Advocate Mr. JS Brar, AAG, Punjab Mr. HS Rakhra, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI, J. The petitioner being a member of an lawful assembly is alleged to have inflicted an injury on the head of Amritpal Singh. Counsel for the petitioner submits that offence u/s 307 IPC has been added on the basis of an opinion of the Doctor , which clearly indicates that there is no bony injury. Even the injury does not fall within the definition of Section 320 IPC. I have heard counsel for the parties. No doubt it will be debatable that the injury attributed to the petitioner is a grievous or not but on account of the part attributed to the petitioner of having inflicted a kirpan blow on the head of Amritpal Singh, no extra ordinary exceptional circumstances exist for the grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. This order will not prejudice the right of the petitioner to seek the concession of regular bail by surrendering before the Illaqa Magistrate by moving an application before the court of competent jurisdiction. October 18 , 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE