IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21156 of 2010 DHIRENDRA GOIT, SON OF BHUNESHWAR PRASAD GOIT, R/O VILLAGE- SRIPUR, P.S. PRATAPGANJ, DISTRICT- SUPAUL. --PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. –OPP.PARTY 2 03.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. Petitioner is solitary named accused in this case being Public Distribution System Dealer since the year 2007. During verification of stock and register etc. the authorities found some discrepancies in the stock register and actual stock of the commodities. The show cause submitted by the petitioner was not found satisfactory. Only thereafter case was lodged. My attention was drawn towards some discrepancies in the reports of the two authorities making inspection; they are Block Supply Officer and Subdivisional Officer. Taking into consideration the discrepancies as regards the quantity as well as commodities, the petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, 2 is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Birpur, in Partapganj P.S. Case no. 54 of 2009, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date before the court below at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. If the petitioner fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra,J.) AAhmad