IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19427 of 2003 Between : A.P.C.P.D.C.L., Rep by Inspector of Police, A.P.T.S.P.S., Sanga Reddy H.Q., at Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 M/s. Noble Plastic Pipes Industry, Shed No. D6, Phase No.V IDA Patencheru (V&M), Medak District. 2 Guggila Yadaiah, S/o. G. Narasimhulu, H.No. 18/44, Shanthinagar Colony, Badepally, Jadcherla (M), Mahaboobnagar District. 3 Abdul Matheen, S/o. Abdul Aziz, 505, Opp. Police Station, Nadcherla, Mahaboobnagar district. 4 arivini Suresh, S/o. Suchanna, R/o. M/s. Noble Plastic Pipes Industry, Flat no.D6, Phase-V, IDA, Patancheru, Medak District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari for the records pertaining to ESC.No 20/2002 DT 24.4.2003 on the file of special court under Indian Electricity (A.P. Amendment) Act,2000, Hyderabad and quash the same holding the same as illegal, arbitrary and opposed to principles of evidence and un-constitutional, and consequently convict the accused under section 39 and 44 of Indian Electricity Act. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.S.SHARAT KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents : O.MANOHAR REDDY(SC FOR APTRANSCO) The Court made the following : ORDER : Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission for withdrawal of the writ petition. Permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, it is open to the petitioner to avail any other alternative remedy available under law. No order as to costs _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 1st July 2009 ajr