IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINALREVISION APPLICATION NO.148 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.146 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.149 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.147 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.150 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 148 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.151 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.149 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.152 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.150 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.153 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.151 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.154 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPICATION NO.152 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.155 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.153 OF 2009 WITH 1 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.156 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.154 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.157 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.155 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.158 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.156 OF 2009 Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court' s orders or directions and Registrar' s orders Courts or Judge' s orders Mr.Girish Kulkarni and Mr.Sandeep Kekane for the Applicant. Ms.S.D.Shinde, A.P.P.for the State. CORAM : A.R.JOSHI, J. DATED : MARCH 31ST, 2009. P.C. In all eleven matters, the order of conviction of the Appellant original accused 2 for the offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and which is upheld in respective criminal Revisions is challenged. It is apparent on the face of the record in final order of 1st Additional Principal Judge City Civil Court, Greater Bombay dated 17th March, 2009 that the sentence of one year imposed on the Applicant accused is enhanced from one year to 1 and ½ year and to pay compensation Rs.4 lacs. 2. It appears that without there being any notice of enhancement or without there is any criminal Revision Petition on behalf of the Petitioner for enhancement of the sentence, such orders appear to have been passed. Reportedly, the Appellant is on temporary bail granted by the first Appellate Court presumably on the ground that the issue as to availability of power to grant such bail as envisaged by the section 389 of Criminal Procedure Code is pending before the larger Bench, and decision is still awaited. 3 2. The learned A.P.P. Ms.Shinde for the Respondent State waives service in all the matters. She be supplied the copies of the petitions. In the meantime, Applicant be released on bail in a sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety for like amount in each matter. Upon request on behalf of the Applicant the same surety with fresh bond before the Trial Court. 4. S.O.for two weeks. (A.R. JOSHI, J.) 4