1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5428 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2156 OF 1990 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5432 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2155 OF 1990 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s | orders orders | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Sanket Kulkarni, Advocate h/f Mr. S.D. Kulkarni, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V.S. Bedre, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATE : 25TH NOVEMBER, 2009 . These are the applications for condonation of delay and for review of the judgment rendered by this Court on 09-01-2007 in Writ Petition No. 2155/1990. This Court dismissed the Writ Petition after hearing Counsel for the parties. Thereafter, the petitioner through her Power of Attorney Holder filed Review Application alongwith an application for condonation of delay. The respondent died during the pendency of the Review Application and the 2 application for condonation of delay. The information was given about the death of the respondent by Mr. V.S. Bedre, learned Counsel for the respondent. On 17-08-2009 Mr. B.B. Rode, learned Counsel holding for Mr. S.D. Kulkarni sought three week's time to take appropriate steps. 2. Mr. Sanket Kulkarni, learned Counsel holding for Mr. S.D. Kulkarni states that though the attempts were made to contact the petitioner / applicant, yet there is no response. So, for want of instructions, steps could not be taken to substitute the L.Rs. of deceased respondent. The deceased respondent was the tenant in possession of the land in question. Considering the legal impediment, both the applications are dismissed as abated. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] sut/NOV09/ca5428.08