IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42910 of 2009 SUBODH YADAV, S/O SURESH YADAV, R/O VILLAGE- SADPUR, P.S.-SAHEBPUR KAMAL, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI. ………………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ……………OPP. PARTY. ----------- 2 21.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case is under Sections 323, 302, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. From the FIR, it appears that one Bablu Kumar was forcibly married with the daughter of Natho Poddar which he never accepted on account of which he was burnt. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except for the statement of one Dularchand Yadav and Satya Narain Mochi recorded during the investigation to the effect that they had come to know that this petitioner was also one of the person who had brought the boy for marriage, there is no material at all in the case diary which in any way implicates this petitioner with the crime. It is said that petitioner is in jail since 29.8.2009. The court below is directed to examine the records and check up the statement of 2 witnesses and if it finds that, except for the hearsay statement of said Dularchand Yadav and Satya Narain Mochi, there is no material at all against the petitioner in the case dairy, it shall allow petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No. 26 of 2009 with conditions as laid down in Sub-Section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)