IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.2919 of 2012 Date of Decision: 17.02.2012 Harpal Kaur ..... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J. 1. Notice of motion. 2. Mr. N.S. Pawar, Addl. AG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Copy of the petition has been supplied to him in the Court. The service on the respondents is waived. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 4. This matter can be disposed of at the motion stage itself without calling for a written statement from the respondents. 5. Admittedly, the regular enquiry is underway, therefore, no interference against the order of suspension of the petitioner on the post of Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat, Pindian, Block Khadoor Sahib, District Tarn Taran is called for at this stage. Accordingly, the matter is disposed of with a direction to the respondents and the enquiry Officer to expedite the enquiry and conclude it preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order after associating the petitioner and permitting him to lead evidence in defence of the charges. (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) 17.02.2012 JUDGE manju