BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Second day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.9611 of 2011 1. ANTHONI ARUL CHEZHIYAN 2. J.GNANASEKAR : PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 & 2 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THATTARMADAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.174 OF 2011 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. J.FRANKLIN Advocate For Respondent : Mr. A.RAMAR Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused No.1 & 2 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 323 of I.P.C. and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act 1998 in Crime No.174 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners were charged under Sections 341, 294(b), 323 of I.P.C. and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act 1998 and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) would submit that a case has been registered on 19.7.2011 and injured were treated as out patient and because of previous enmity, the occurrence has been taken place and investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case this Court could find that a case has been registered on 19.7.2011 under Sections 341, 294(b), 323 of I.P.C and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act 1998 and injured were treated as out patient and investigation is considerably over. Considering all these facts, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam, and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 5.30 p.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. Sd/- 02/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SATHANKULAM. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THATTARMADAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. J.FRANKLIN Advocate SR.No.25668 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9611 of 2011 Date :02/08/2011 NSV/4.8.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/