WWWW mm 31mm (Wu) B: Hon’bie Justice Mr. Pritin 173-w-2069: ‘ Mr. PP Sahu, hounsei fort e petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, Pa e3 Lawyer for the State. Counsei for the' petitioner s .bmits that according to the petitioner his case is squarely .covered with the ecision of this Court passed in WP. (S) No. 5301/2006 {Piiaram Deewan nother Vs. State of CG. & others}.vHe further submits that in the iight‘ o the judgment of this Court, he may be permitted to withdrawn the pres t petition with tiberty to fiie a detaited representation before the respond nt No. 2 and the same may be directed to be decided expeditiousty. Counsel for the respondent lState submits that at this stage he can not make any statement as to wh her the case of the petitioner Is covered With the order passed in afore entloned identicat wnt petrtion or not However, he submrts that sf the . etrtioner make: a representataon to the authority concerned, the same sh 3i be decided strictty in accordance with taw, Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with tiberty as aforesaid if the oetitroner ma es a representation to the authority concerned Within a period of four t eeks from the date or rece'pt of copy of this order the same is expected o be dectded Within a further period of three months from the date of its / Sd/- ‘ Pritinker Diwakelj: Judge ’ ,j; S k r Diwaker a r