1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1091 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1091 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1091 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1101 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1101 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1101 OF 2004 Tanaji Shamrao Nalavade : Applicant. versus The State of Maharashtra : Respondent. WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1092 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1092 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1092 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1101 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1101 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1101 OF 2004 1. Vilas Pandurang Raut 2. Popat Pandurang Raut : Applicants. versus The State of Maharashtra : Respondent. WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1093 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1093 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1093 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1101 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1101 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1101 OF 2004 2 2 2 Ghanshyam Namdeo Atigre : Applicant. versus The State of Maharashtra : Respondent. Mr.Nitin Pradhan, Sr.Advocate, with Ms.Shubhada Khot and Mr.Shahen Pradhan & Mr.Maheen Pradhan for the applicants. Mr.P.S.Hingorani, APP, for the State CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE S.R.SATHE, JJ. S.R.SATHE, JJ. S.R.SATHE, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 20, 2007. DATED : FEBRUARY 20, 2007. DATED : FEBRUARY 20, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. So far as Criminal Application No.1091 of 2006 is concerned, it is filed by original accused No.1 for bail. His earlier application for bail was rejected on merits. Thereafter he filed 2nd application for bail. But he withdrew that 2nd application on medical ground. This is the third application. 2. So far as Criminal Application Nos.1092 of 2006 and 1093 of 2006 are concerned, they are 3 3 3 filed by original accused Nos. 3 & 4 and original accused No.2 respectively for bail. 3. The learned advocate for all the original accused contended that if the appeal could be fixed for final hearing, as the paper book is ready, then he would not press all these three application. 4. The incident is of 1st February 2003’ the paper book is ready and, as such the appeal is fixed for final hearing in the third week of July 2007 commencing from 16th July 2007 onwards. In this view of the matter, these three applications are disposed of as not pressed. [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [S.R.SATHE, J] [S.R.SATHE, J] [S.R.SATHE, J]