:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 160 OF 2008 Sion Devi Nivas Co.op Housing Society Ltd ...Petitioners Versus The Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Socities, Mumbai Division, Mumbai & Ors. ....Respondents ====== Mr.S.A.Pawar, Adv. for the petitioners. Ms.V.S.Mhaisapurkar, for respondent no.1 and 2. Mr.Girish B.Kedia Adv. for respondent no.4. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 29th January, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. The impugned order is inter-locutory. There is no reason to interfere as the main Revision Application is pending before the Divisional Joint Registrar, Mumbai Division, Mumbai. 2. It is directed that merely because the order of the Assistant Registrar dated 30.4.2007 is given effect to, :2: :2: :2: does not mean that the Revision Application becomes infructuous or that the petitioner society has no remedy to remove the encroachment, if any, which has been made by the respondent nos.3 and 4. 3. All that can be directed is that, the Revision Application No. 379 of 2007 shall be heard as expeditiously as possible and within a period of three months from today. Writ Petition is disposed off. All contentions in that behalf are kept open. If the order of the Assistant Registrar is implemented in the meanwhile, that will be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner-society in the pending Revision Application, so also, that will not affect the remedies available to the petitioner-society to remove the unauthorised construction, if any. sd/- ******