IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.12557 of 2009 Ram Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Hemen Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana for the State. RANJIT SINGH J. The petitioner has approached this Court for quashing the advertisement issued for appointment of 243 posts of Canal Patwari. This, however, was subsequently increased to 418 on 03.02.2009. Mr. Rathee points out that similar issue has been considered by the Court and the challenge made to the advertisement declined, while deciding Civil Writ Petition No. 7911 of 2007 decided on 11.01.2008. Counsel for the petitioner, however, says that application for reviewing the said order was subsequently passed where the Court has held that those who had earlier applied would not be considered ineligible on account of being over age. Mr. Rathee also points out that the petitioner is not yet overage and can apply for the post and rather he has indeed applied for the post. The application of the petitioner is required to be considered in accordance with law. No case for quashing the advertisement is made out. Dismissed. December 10, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE