THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMA MOHANA RAO W.A.No.216 of 2011 JUDGMENT (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) The appellants are aggrieved by an order dated 26.11.2010 passed in W.P.No.24904 of 2001. 2. The respondent, who worked as Checker in a private bus on the route from Vizianagaram to S.Kota, is claiming for absorption as Conductor in the appellants-APSRTC as per the scheme evolved and in accordance with the guidelines and he ﬁled W.P.No.28312 of 1996, which in turn was disposed of with a direction to the Corporation to consider the case of the respondent for absorption. As the Corporation rejected his claim, the respondent ﬁled W.P.No.22732 of 1998, which in turn was dismissed by this Court on 30.06.1999. The Writ Appeal being W.A.No.1461 of 1999 ﬁled by the respondent was allowed on 26.10.1999 directing the Corporation to consider his case for appointment as Conductor in accordance with the rules and the scheme framed for absorption of displaced employees within a period of 8 weeks. Challenging the said order, the Corporation ﬁled S.L.P.No.88 of 2000, which was dismissed on 13.08.2011 as such the judgment in W.A.No.1461 of 1999 had become ﬁnal. Seeking implementation of the said judgment, the respondent made a representation on 09.11.2001 and the Corporation in turn has issued a letter dated 29.11.2001 calling him to appear before the Selection Committee for interview on 10.12.2001 along with certain certiﬁcates. The said letter was challenged by the respondent by ﬁling W.P.No.24904 of 2001, whereby the learned single Judge by the order impugned directed the Corporation to consider the case of the respondent for appointment as Conductor in accordance with the rules and the scheme framed for absorption of displaced employees by conducting interview and on production of services certiﬁcates and certiﬁcation of his educational qualiﬁcations, within a period of four weeks from the date of the order. Aggrieved by the same, the Corporation ﬁled the present appeal. 3. Inasmuch as the direction issued to the Corporation in W.A.No.1461 of 1999 for consideration of the case of respondent for appointment as Conductor in accordance with the Rules and the scheme framed by the Corporation for absorption of displaced employees, had attained ﬁnality in view of dismissal of S.L.P.No.88 of 2000, the appellants are bound to consider his case for appointment as Conductor and the learned single Judge has rightly passed the order impugned. Therefore, we ﬁnd no inﬁrmity in the order impugned warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs. ______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J _________________________ NOOTY RAMA MOHANA RAO, J Date:28.11.2011 sj .