"^;\^ INNWO'WI COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 2435 of2008 PETITIONER : Sayed Haider Ali Jafri S/o Sayed Mohd. Ali Jafri aged about 56 years r/o Dharampura - 3, Jagdalpur C,G VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh - Through - The Collector Jagdalpyr C;G. 2. Transport Commissioner, Raipur, C.G. 3. Regioiial Trasisport CoiimiissiosiCT, Jagdalpur C.G. WRTT PETITION XJNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agiuhotri, J. Present: Sliri A.V.Shridhar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Govenmient Advocate for the State / respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 29 day of April, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner siibmits that a departmental eiiquin/' was initiated by the respondent authorities and has been completed. Pursuant to the departmental enquiry» a show cause notice was issued on 10.12.2007 (Aimex^TQ P/2). The petitioner submitted his response to the show cause notice on 07.01.2008 (Annexure P/3). 2. Immediately after completion ofthree months, the petitioner has mshed to this Court seeking a direction to the Disciplinary Airthority to pass the final order. This power vests in the executive as passing order in the departmental enquiry ^ falls within the domam of executive. This Court should siot ^tep mto it, asid in the facts ofthe case when only about tliree months have passed after reply was filed by the petitioner. 3. Be that as it may, leamed counsel appearmg for the reBpondents that the proper order will be passed after due consideration ofhis reply. 4. In view of foregomg, nothing sundves m this matter and this petitioii disposed of. No order asto coste. _- Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Anut