:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.681 OF 2005 Santosh Prakash Gaikwad ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr. Vilas B. Tapkir, for the Applicant. Mr. D.R. More, A.P.P., for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 17th February 2005 P.C.: . Heard Counsel for the parties. As I indicated my mind, the learned Counsel for the Applicant submitted that the Applicant be permitted to withdraw this application, so that any observation made by this Court for rejecting the bail application shall not come in the way of the Applicant in the course of the trial. He prays that the Applicant be permitted to withdraw :2: this application unconditionally. Accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn unconditionally. It is made clear that the trial Court shall decide the matter on its own merits in accordance with law uninfluenced by any observation made by the lower Court while rejecting the bail application preferred by the present Applicant or of disposal of the present application. . As request for bail has been rejected, the Sessions Judge, Pune, is directed to assign the case to Fast Track Court, if not already done, to ensure early disposal of the trial. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)