RGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BRLASPUR Wi’it ?etitian(C§ Ne. 4864 of 290? Harial Chandrakar, aged about 66 years, S/o. Shri Sarha Chandrakar, ' Rlo‘ ViHage Vinayakpur, P8. Puigaon, Ne Anda, Tahsi! & District Burg (CG) FTlTloNER E Versus RESPONDENTS 1 ) Siate of Ch‘nattisgarh through Senior Superintendent of Poiice, District Durg (CG). _ omcer-in-charge, Pciice Station Anda, District Durg (CG) Khuman Sing‘n Diiliwar. Sio‘ Shyam La! Diiliwar, aged about 52 years, resideni‘ of viéiaga‘ Vinayakpur, Ponce Station Anda, Tahsi! and District Burg (CG) ‘ t (Writ Petition under Articte 226 of the Conetttution of lndia) ‘ SB: Hon’bte Mr. Satish K‘Agnihotri, J. Pres , Shri Littam Pandey, counsei for the petrtronert Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyerfor the State. GR§ER (Passed or: 21 5‘ August, 2907) Learned oounsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has lodged first information report in the Potice Station Anda’ District Durg. i spt’te of that, the Police Station has nottaken any action on the compliant made by the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing tor the‘petitioner refers to ietters dated 7-1 2-2606 (Annexures P13 and PM) addressed to the Senior’ Superintendent of. Poiice, District Durg through the Otticer—in-cnarge, Poiioe Station Anda, District Durg. 2) The petitioner has not produced any other document in support of his submission that he has filed a complaint in the Poilce Station and the Police Station failed togregister the case. The documents dated 7-12-2006 (Annexures P/3 and PM) indicate that the petitioner, instead of approaching the H w ent; n uwcE. EEE? .x gmumm ém umtmkvma. wmu. Rmwscmamwh mEaw 5% mdZ Ewbcogmwh mzw Mb.mmmEmwgEoo m mEwuQ “0%c9 E»? K . (Jmocmwhr 8m g “wig. mi $mm§mm§ acm .awmMmw,” >m h 46¢ :(u. vmwmfm 0 m 8% . .Qsm Exwwa«Wazon. WeEmUcmEcmgnw