PETITIONER RESPONDENTS M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT .BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S2 Na. 296 0f2008 Amrit Lal Dansena, S/o $i1n“ Hariram Damena, aged abom 49 years, Assistant Teachen Govermnent Girls Pn‘mary School: Mura, Block ~— Kharsia; District v Raigarh (CG) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Though Secretary, Education The Director, Public instruction Department, Raipur (CG) .Assistant Commissioner, Tribal and Welfare Department, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) Depar‘maent, DKS. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Block Education 0Ecer, Kharsia, District — Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 4. Present: Shri Aail Mourya, Advocate for the peiitioner. Shri Arvind Dubeye Pane} Lawyer for the State/respondents. SB Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agg’lptri. J. ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner was appointed on 29.07.1980 on probation for a period of two years as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs. 156/-. After completion ofhis probation, he was granted regular my scale. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether, the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale with eifect Dom the date of initial appointment or after completion ofprobation period. 3. The issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in 0A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & Others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale with effect nom the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by tl;e\'Hon’ble (Passed on 14m day of Jammy, 2908) / /, t Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tu‘bunal to tlm eifect that r the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale &om the date ofihitial appointment. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner further submits that this Court, while considering the same issue in Ram Kumar Sahu & Others Vs. State Govt. ofChhattisgarh & another, W.P.(S) No. 813 0f2807: by order dated 12.02.2007, has granted regular pay scale with effect from the date ofinitial appointment. Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that the case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case Ref Ram Kumar Sahu & Others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & snother (supra). In view of that, this petition is allowed in the same terms, subject to verification ofthe facts. No order asto costs. ‘ sd/. l l Satish K. Agnihotri y Judge