IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 29TH JANUARY 2010 / 9TH MAGHA 1931 WA.No. 153 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.23493/2010 Dated 24/11/2009 .................... APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONERS IN WPC: -------------------------------- 1. K.P.DILIP, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.LATE PRABHAKARAN,FLAT NO.33,JM HABITAT, SASTRI ROAD, VADUTHALA, KOCHI. 2. P.K.USHA DILIP, W/O.DILIP,FLAT NO.33, JM HABITAT,SASTRI ROAD, VADUTHALA, KOCHI. BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE SRI.A.V.JOJO RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS IN WPC: --------------------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 2. TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNUR TALUK OFFICE. 3. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, PALLIMUKKU, KOCHI. 4. P.VIJAYACHANDRAN, PRESIDENT, JM HABITAT APARTMENT OWNERS' WELFARE ASSOCIATION (REGD), JM HABITAT, SASTHRI ROAD, VADUTHALA, COCHIN-682 023. BY ADV.SHRI.K.K.M.SHERIFF SHRI.M.DINESH THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JJ. ------------------------------- W.A.NO.153 OF 2010 () ----------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of January, 2010 J U D G M E N T Raman,J. Appellants, who are the owners of Flat No.33 of JM Habitat in Cheranalloor Village, Kanayannur Taluk, complaining that their water connection is disconnected, approached this Court by filing a writ petition. The learned Single Judge, finding that the dispute is virtually between the petitioners and the Association and no water connection as such has been given to the petitioners by the Water Authority, dismissed the petition without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to approach the civil court as if the dispute is between two private individuals. Hence, this appeal. When the matter was taken up for consideration, it is submitted that the dispute between the parties, for the time being, is amicably settled in the presence of the District WA.153/10 2 Collector. In such circumstances, it is academic to consider the writ appeal. Hence, this writ appeal is dismissed. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE prp