IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 16978 of 2010 Date of Decision: 21.9.2010. Om Parkash Sharma --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. K.S. Banyana, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.D. Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioner retired as Tax Inspector on 31.12.2009 on attaining the age of superannuation. The grievance of the petitioner is that his retirement benefits like pension, leave encashment, Provident Fund, 60% arrears of the 6th Pay Commission and Commutaion of Pension, L.T.C benefits and installments of D.A have not been paid. The petitioner served a representation dated 10.3.2010 (Annexure P-1) but without any response. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the representation made by the petitioner, referred to above. CWP. No. 16978 of 2010 -2- In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.4 to take decision on the representation made by the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 21.9.2010. lucky