Mii- ^ BEFORETHEM.P.STATEADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BENCH RAIPUR i^^r.''^^^-^- O.A. NO._____/20pT~~""~~ 'g^'&M^T0^ I,,. , ^/^} :°^, APPLICANT ^J <•», NON-APPLICANT ii^s ;?»?;;,:^i P Si ?n. "'. '-"•: SMT.AZRAQUffESHI . _R^_ Wife of Shri A.M QG^ShF Asstt. Professor Deptt. of So&ology Govt. Arts & Commerce College, Jarhabhata, Bilaspur(C.G.) VERSUS 1. StateofC.G. through the Secretary Department of Higher Education Govt. of Chhattisgarh, D.KS.Bhavan, Raipur 2. Principal Govt. Arts & Commerce College, Jarhabhatha Bilaspur(C.G.) |Ki(:! ORIGINALAPPLICATIONUNDERSECTION190FTHEM.P.STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALACT, 1985 n •nSB'-BW B •^"; li^Nili [m M'li' 11:! 1 HiGH<3l3UR'l'C>F"©HBi f'TISGftRMa BlLASPUR SINGl.EBlEN(lH;:HC!iN'Bl.;eMR.SA-nSHK.AGNIHOT:Rl.d. Petitioner ResDondents WRIT PETITION .) N0.4424 OF 2005 Smt. AzraQureshi versus Stateof C.G. and another Petitioner Respondeht CQNTEMPTPETITIONNO.'1236F200e Smt.Azra Qureshi versus •Y.S.Bele 'liiSB !•• 'f^^ aiii ^stl6 ^^[:i NICi Present : Mr. Maneesh Sharnia, counsel for the petitioner iin 'bothi the.petitions..'.: l'^:h.';.''/^-::' '!- . •' • : :':1'?^:;:;; :H;.:.i!!1 Mr. V.V.S.iVloorthy, Deputy Advocate Generai iwith K4f.| j Ajay 13wiyeai,Pany;;l-a^erf^rtherespondOT •W.R.{^.)Nd.4424Q005.';;.,'" :.-.:'^ :-^': 1; ;:F „ 1. ::.: Mr. f^nkaj Shrjvastaya^Cpynsel for the respqncteM ContemptPt.No.123/2006. i^ 1 iiS! .'iB 's'as :£">isl a ORDER ^Passed on 12l"^f0ct6ber, 2006) Thesearetwopgtitioi^,^:,^nt;Retiti<^r(SjNe.'i>424s®f| c 20i35 and Contenipt PetitiOn Not1;231^ofa|tQ6. arises in tlie: writ] petition. T^uSiijtHe^ petitibn areIBeingldisposed of?byitlii& TKe'(<;ciri1ienipts tiBni: ciEimm^ri'erelSr. vv^^&^^ '•^;:B^si ^^'i^l •i;^E!i!?.a-,-;tia ?<M ^s||j III 'li'iliiit i|!^;ii" • :ifNs11i^4j.^t 16 (IHi.JJL '^ ^".^-.••••^" !!"1' 2.; The originaf appiicatiera was fited before the State ;iftdministrative Tribuhal, Bench at Raipur, impugning the transfer order dated 26-12-2001 (Annexure A-1^), whereby the petitioner. who was working on the post of Assistant Professor at Government P.G..Arts and Commerce Coiiege, Jarhabhata, Bilaspur, District Bilaspyr.Twas transferred to. the Government Coilege, Lalbahadumagar, Districf Rajnandgaon. 3. Whileadmitting the petition, th®Tribuna!, byitSoreler dated 8-1 -2002, granted sfefas qiio with regard t6 the posting of ffie petitioneras on 28-12-2001. Learriedcounsel for the Retitioner submits that despite there being the saidorder ofstetos guo.a transfer OKier dated 30-6-2006 (Annexure C-3 in Contempt Petition No. 123 of 2006) was passed transferring the petitioner to Government P.G. N.E.Si College, Jashpurnagar. However, no effect to the said order dated 30- 6-2006 wasgiven. i 4. Asamatteroffact,thepetitioner,tiyvrayofinterimorder| dated 8-1-20Q2, remained posted on the sains place, i.e.,Governm^nt! P.G. Arts and Commeroe College, Jarhabhata, Biiaspur, Bilaspur for more[than four yeare; The petitioner coyld npt continueiaf| oneplace fbrever. ' 5. ItiSiWellsettledprincipleoflawthatttansferisanm^ of service and it fe fbr the emplciyer td decide as to where a partici.llarj officertemployee be posted keeRiRg m view public interest as; administrative exigency.; This CSurt Bas limffied jyrisdictiQn to iititer^Fe withth&transfermatteraandthisg^rteanifl^ Pistrid!| 1 we ^^^?. II ^:''.;.sL!yFt:' M3BI •lifli 8';ii?iBI •NBilKI ia ;81il i^^^ aai:!i r •3S i'vsa • ^sssa lill aan ;:fli!ll :::!:!l!i 1.^11 'iii.iiiHI 1:i!8 •jjffliS 1;:;;::^:'.''^H: !!":![::;ltl :>iiu. 'iN^ asi Jll-:l[].iljt li;i! m'WKm f» BU'i;;SSUB:i^'S: •il'i;ili::^^€ iM-!;;i!SsiiJS;» !BI':£8NSiBr It Si.S;t> Mit ItlHi M iitl' iililll ' M: !' :i, of proved mala ficfe, non-coinpefence of authority passing the transfer order and transfer order riot being in conformity with the rules and regulations. None ofthe abovegrounds are available to the petjtioner. In the facts and Gireumstances of the case, it is not necessary^ito examine validity ofthe transfer prders at this stage. However, flie respondents -authorities are directed notto insistoh complianc&oftHe transferorderedated 26-12-2001and 30-6-2006. ' 6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of and the contempt petition is dismissed. Notice to the respondent in the contempt petition is discharged. Howsver, the respondents - authorities are at liberty to pass appropriate order for posting the petitioner in public interest andadministrativeexigency, in accordance withiaw. Noorder as t6 costs. 7. A copy pf thisOrder be placed on the record of the contempt petition. Sd/- Satfsh X Agmhfitri Judge (Sina!