^. ®0' /'- 1 lli ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR W. P. No. 2-212) /2003 PETITIONER : La^ Kumar Pandey S/0 Makhan Lal Pandey, aged 40 years R/0 ' Purana Sarkanda, Shiv Ghat, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary General Administration Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) ^^•" ^-^1 ,<>•'' ..'• k«< -_.l '?"«•*'"•• ^yy^ «siy' ..••' <^°LA.--' y 2. Collector, Bilaspur Dist-Bilaspur (C.G.)| ^ PETITION UNDER ARTICLE OF CONSTITUTION OE' INDIA. UiitliiUUfclKl 'USKSi.M:'^ g|I|||||,|. 3EE,i|K22'; i"ltl K1! !! il *»- 'g?? •twfwf, ®tfttt*«»,Ktwwy [0 .^....AyjL^, SWKtfttWtW '» *'- w» •aftS!t'reiRR-dfefl ?^-^-.3rnn^ a»y"(?~&Wri> Smt. Meena Shastri, coui^ Shr-i Sanjiiy K. Agrawal, the State/respondenfs. iy this petition filed un^ .,4 Indla, Sftili^an order from th| cbsorb the pe+i+ioner ih any vac es scheme to absorb the pstitibn^ petjtioner-'s petitiQn the peti.tio^ as a compiler on cpnfract of and he worked froffi 5-8-1991 ti^ that perjod wios satisfactory- The petitionsr- has bssn r^ period. The iotate of Madhya the effeet tha+'ail the empieye^ have been ter'minated on accod tt'eflrt'erf ag sut'pius employees appointment pn ths similar post^ The respondent No.l ha^ of the Census &eRartment witi Chhattisgrh ,S't-ate aod there u| earlier occasion jthrough the eroployees were 'absorbsci. T\ respondent No.l aboutthe arB 'bWlfert't ttl*t<iit4'te^ <P>K(K %-3#CTSg^ Isel for the petitioner. |beputy Adyocots Serisral tskss notice for |er Article 226/227 of the Constitution of 1 Court directing the respondent No.l to ant apprppriate available post or +o workout |r in the appropriats smploYment, as per the ier was oppointed ;in the Census Qepartment cified durations by the cowpetsnt au+hori+y 31-5-1992 and his wor,k and eonduct during strenched after completianof ths specifisd Prfadesh issued acircular from time to time to ^ pf +he Census bepartnient whpss services |lt of the expiry of The term, they witl'be they wili be given priprity in the mofter' of issued a letter stating that the efflployees Ise be eountecf as sur'pius employeesiin the W be rw need of separ-ate directipii." On liar dated 27-2-8g all: +he .,re'l-rench6d le authority hqs also confmunicuted; the of these census employees. reaufcrization s s- I I! litfl 'aBge-^ ! B^VSI few^^w SP*ll<tl *|t@^ '< < :3'^'^B?RE;'3?tepI3, ftwKify %^?r ti^% 'wwwaxtKti "Wt. 2fl» fes^I" ?^S s'SfP^^^ 2- Qn the other- hond, similariy absorbed in the other district iike /| aiso gsing tbtske Qppointmsnts in th Ihwe heard the lear'ned coul Ashas been mentjoned in the ,on contraet basis for a fixed petitioner'g sei-'vices has been termir] The main grie'/arice of ths lee^ the petitioner is not being eonsider other appointments are bein9 '(•aken) The learned counsel for the the Apex Cour"t reported in AIR Tsmil Nodu srid dnother vs. 6. the Hon'ble Apex Court issusd direc; out a scheme to dbspr'b these smp would be approprlate •fo" The ©over Thess employees in appr'opriate emp out as ws think that such a situation when such situations had arisen, absorbed in Sovernment service 6over'nm«ntmoy alsojbear'in mind u in +he iocal authoriti|es, quaSi-gbvei conipanies. f . thofee »]nfef4i*ii*n3'It fa'A <FWSK ^djpd*on^i |>laced census emp'oyees have also been imbikapur and the fresh candidates are ^ placs of the pstitioner. [isel for the parties. . ^etition itself that the appointment was te(*m and on expiry of that terrn the ta+ed. |rnsd counsel for the petitioner is that (ed even in Census Oepartment. Some (lace. . |etitioner placed reliance on decteion of i8^9 SUPREME COUST 2202 (Sovt. of Mo|io)7)ed Awnsnuddin & Othsrs) in nriiich direcl'ions that the Sovernnient shouid work Isyees in oppropria+e employments. It (iment fo work out a scheme to absorb |oyment. Let such a scheme he Wforked oecosionally arise. Onear'isr occasions who had dpne'similarjobs,hadbeen ;>y the oppellant. In doin9 SQ) the hether'lt!e employeesjcan be peccyited 'nmental organizationg or 6overnmeht Ba-HC-22 ; 3fgSgt'w: ft^NTi NN?;siiRi •??ffPft.'HE?Ct ..<"• t—^- '3;^'!:?RRPt, aTtlwre, fa?(W3< w*fwiw*n<»» sii^r tR^ ^^ld)^.!Sz.. "^ 2B9 &fe^»" <m^{'?^B^ «^4 -I m4y In vlew of ths above dire. 6overnwen+ of ChhaT+isgarh employsss whd hsd worked unde direction giverr by the Hon'bie approach the Sovernment for ab of Chhattisgarh, the Deportfflenl repr'esen+a+ion appropria+ely. In yiew 6f this order, 6803/2003 stand disposed of. With these observotions, stions given by the Hon'ble Apex Court, the m4y aiso consider for absorbing the sur'plus the Cansus bspartnient in the Ijght o.f the A^ex Court and the petitioner* is at iiberty to ab^orption ond on his moving, the ffovernment |of SenerQt Administration may conslder his AA.(W.)P. No. 2003/2003 and l.A. No. jt'he writ oetition is diaposed of. ^t^tlcNii^ 'ETER^^ 'f^1^ ^E^t'^K ^ sfpgir %i^f Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge' itB I fls