IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1813 of 2010 ARUN KUMAR, SON OF SHRI SHAMBHU NATH PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- MASIJID ROAD, P.O. AND P.S.- PUPRI, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI :---PETITIONER. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH MR. THE AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION COMMISSIONER, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 2. MR. B. RAJENDRA, THE ADMINISTRATOR, BIHAR STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD (REPEALED) PANT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 3. DR. M.M. GHOSH UNDER SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD (REPEALED), PANT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA :--- CONTEMNORS/OPP.PARTIES. ----------- 6. 13.05.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner has filed reply to the second supplementary show-cause. Opposite Party No. 1 has filed 3rd supplementary show- cause. Both the pleadings are taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the entire retrial dues has been paid to the petitioner in compliance of the order of the High Court but the calculation on the basis of which deductions have been made from the gratuity amount of the petitioner is incorrect and petitioner be granted one another indulgence to approach Sri Murli Manohar Ghosh, Under Secretary, so as to enable the Under Secretary 2 to understand the mechanics of the correct calculation which the petitioner shall produce before Sri Ghosh within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order whereafter Sri Ghosh shall consider the calculation submitted by the petitioner and if he is satisfied that earlier calculation on the basis of which payments have been made to the petitioner is incorrect, he shall ensure that the arrears in the light of the fresh calculation is paid to the petitioner within another one month. In case Sri Ghosh is not satisfied about the calculation furnished by the petitioner, he shall pass a reasoned order within the same time. 3. With the aforesaid observation the contempt application is disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)