IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-6501 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: March 05, 2010 Sarfo @ Renu and another Petitioners Versus State of Punjab Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. Karambir Singh Kahlon, Advocate for the petitioners DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in FIR No. 16 dated 4.2.2010 registered under Section 304-B IPC at Police Station Division No. 2, Pathankot, District Gurdaspur. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioners are mother-in-law and father-in-law of the deceased and no specific allegations have been levelled against them. The deceased improved her qualification while remaining in her in-laws house and left suicide note before her death wherein also she has not alleged anything against the present petitioners. I have heard the arguments of learned counsel for the petitioners and have also gone through the contents of the FIR as well as suicide note left by the deceased. There is nothing in the suicide note left by the deceased that the petitioners were innocent and no action could be taken against them. There are specific allegations against both the petitioners and there was specific Crl. Misc. No. M-6501 of 2010 (O&M) 2 demand of Rs. 1 lac and even after fulfillment of that demand when some amount was given, the deceased was harassed by both the petitioners as well as by her husband. No ground to grant anticipatory bail is made out. Dismissed. (DAYA CHAUDHARY) 05.03.2010 JUDGE reena