HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY C.R.P.No.587 of 2011 Date : 23-9-2011 Between : Kari Gopi Krishna .. Petitioner And Komire Venkanna and others .. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri P. Prabhakar Rao Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 & 9 : None appeared Counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 8 : Sri O. Manohar Reddy The Court made the following: ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition arises out of order dated 3- 2-2011 in I.A.No.910/2010 in O.S.No.152/2005 whereby the learned Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District dismissed the said I.A. filed by the petitioner seeking appointment of an Advocate-Commissioner. The petitioner is defendant No.7 in the suit filed by respondent Nos.1 to 3 for recovery of compensation for the death of one K. Venkataramulu due to electrocution. The petitioner is the tenant of the premises to which the electrical wire which caused the accident was connected. After the evidence was closed and the suit was posted for arguments, the petitioner came up with the above mentioned application seeking appointment of an Advocate- Commissioner to note down the physical features relating to location of new poles and measuring the distance between the old pole and the hospital of defendant No.6. This application having been dismissed, the petitioner has filed the present revision petition. After hearing Sri P. Prabhakara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the application filed by the petitioner at the stage of arguments is too belated. The petitioner having kept quiet for more than six years after the institution of the suit, cannot be permitted to come out with such an application. Therefore, I do not find any error in the order passed by the lower court. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel, interim order dated 25-2-2011 is vacated and CRPMP No.838/2011 is disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy Date : 23-9-2011 AM