IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 2176 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 13/09/2004 in WPMP.NO.8768 OF 2004 AND WVMP.NOS.1707 AND 2634 OF 2004 IN WP NO : 6748 OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 Chandoori Muthaiah S/o Kistaiah R/o Pallegudem (V) Khammam rural(M) Khammam District 2 Chandoori nageswara Rao S/o Veeraiah R/o Pallegudem (V) Khammam rural(M) Khammam District 3 Chandoori Sudhakar S/o Veeraiah R/o Pallegudem (V) Khammam rural(M) Khammam District 4 Linga Mallamma W/o Ramulu R/o Pallegudem (V) Khammam rural(M) Khammam District 5 Tomu Nagaratnamma W/o Krishnaiah R/o Pallegudem (V) Khammam rural(M) Khammam District 6 Kanakamedala Venkatarathnam W/o Satyanarayana R/o Pallegudem (V) Khammam rural(M) Khammam District 7 Chandoori Seetharamaiah S/o Pattaiah R/o Pallegudem (V) Khammam rural(M) Khammam District 8 Chandoori Laxmaiah S/o Pattaiah R/o Pallegudem (V) Khammam rural(M) Khammam District 9 Chandoori Laxmaiah S/o Pattaiah R/o Pallegudem (V) Khammam rural(M) Khammam District 10 Smt. M. Shakuntala W/o Sangaiah Kodad, Nalgonda district ..... APPELLANTS AND 1 Government of A.P., rep by Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The District Collector, Khammam 3 Revenue Divisional Officer, Khammam 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Khammam Rural (M) Khammam district. 5 The Superintendent Engineer, NSC, (Monitoring Division) Tekulapally, Khammam 6 The Executive Engineer, NSC, (Monitoring Division) Tekulapally, Khammam 7 Telangana Fourth Class Employees Association, Khammam District, rep by President Sri Kodi Lingaiah .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants : MR.KOWTURU VINAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION Counsel for the respondent No.7: Mrs. S. Nanda. The Court made the following : ORAL JUDGMENT: ( per Hon’ble The Chief Justice ) ….. We see no grounds to interfere with the order passed by the learned single Judge in allowing the vacate stay applications thereby modifying the interim order of status quo. Rights of the appellants came to an end on assigning the land by the Government. In any case, on dismissal of W.P.Nos. 26336 of 1995 and 15487 of 2003, appellants have no right to interject in the manner in which the land has been utilised by the respondents. Accordingly writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. ____________________ DEVINDER GUPTA. C.J., ______________________ M. NARAYANA REDDY. J., Dated: 29.12.2004. VRK. To 1 The Secretary to Government of A.P., Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The District Collector, Khammam 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Khammam 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Khammam Rural (M) Khammam district. 5 The Superintendent Engineer, NSC, (Monitoring Division) Tekulapally, Khammam 6 The Executive Engineer, NSC, (Monitoring Division) Tekulapally, Khammam 7. Two CCs to G.P. for Land Acquisition, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 8. Two CD copies. HON’BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. NARAYANA REDDY. W.A.NO. 2176 OF 2004. ( Judgment of the Bench delivered by Hon’ble The Chief Justice ) Dt: 29.12.2004.