IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2009 / 15TH POUSHA 1930 LA.App..No. 2427 of 2008() -------------------------- LAR.183/2004 of SUB COURT, CHERTHALA .................... APPELLANT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT IN LAR: -------------- 1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSIDC, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI.D.KRISHNANKUTTY PILLAI SRI.SHEEJO CHACKO RESPONDENT(S)/CLAIMANT AND 1ST RESPONDENT IN LAR: --------------- 1. SIVAKUMAR, S/O. PRABHAKARAN NAIR, LAKSHMI NIVAS, PALLIPURAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SPECIAL TAHASILDAR(LA), INDUSTRIAL GROWTH CENTRE, CHERTHALA. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/01/2009 ALONG WITH L.A.A. 2429/08 & L.A.A. 2446/08, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: L.A.A. 2427/2008 ORDER ON I.A. 5423/08 IN L.A.A.2427/08 DISMISSED. SD/- M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. 5.1.2009 //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. M.N. KRISHNAN, J ----------------------- L.A.A.Nos. 2427 OF 2008, 2429 OF 2008 & 2446 OF 2008 --------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT These appeals are preferred against the award of the Subordinate Judge, Cherthala in L.A.R. Nos. 183/04, 26/04 and 41/03. The 2nd respondent before the Land Acquisition court is the appellant in all these appeals. The learned counsel for the appellant have made available before me for perusal a copy of the judgment of this court in L.A.A. 2353/2008 which is also against the same batch of cases and the Division Bench by its judgment dated 5.12.2008 held that “The Acquisition is for the purpose of Industrial Growth Centre, Pallipuram. It is not in dispute that connected matters have already been dismissed by this court. Therefore this appeal is dismissed”. So in the light of the decision referred to above these appeals also lack merits and are only to be dismissed and I do so. The appeals are dismissed accordingly. M.N. KRISHNAN,JUDGE vkm