IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.1174 OF 2005 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1659 OF 2005 Anil Laxman Chandorkar ...Appellant Versus Ramchandra Balaji Divekar ...Respondent ...... Mr.Pravin V.Desai i/b Mr.Rahul S.Thakur for Appellant. Mr.Rajiv Patil for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JANUARY 23, 2006. JANUARY 23, 2006. JANUARY 23, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. In view of the finding recorded by the Court below that the lease in favour of the Appellant was unregistered document, and in any case, was a monthly tenancy coupled with the fact that the lease was terminated by notice dated 8th : 2 : July 1998, the conclusion as reached by the Court below against the Appellant was inevitable. No substantial question of law arises for consideration. Dismissed. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.