1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 366 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr.S.P.Katneshwarkar, Advocate for appellant. ............................ CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE: 07/09/2010 PER COURT : 1. Heard Mr. Katneshwarkar, the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. The appellant is the original plaintiff, had filed a Suit against the defendant seeking injunction against the defendant from carrying out the constructions over the property bearing Plot No. 22 on the ground that the defendant does not have any valid permission. It was not disputed that the defendant is the owner of plot No. 22. Both the Courts have observed that the defendants have produced on record the construction permission granted by the competent authority and the construction 2 which is being made by the defendant, was on her plot. Even the Courts have found that the constructions was not being made on open land as contended. There are concurrent findings of facts of both the Courts. 3. The Second Appeal being sans any substantial question of law, is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] knp/ SA 366.2010