Y^^llC-78 31?^T ^T'ftFThF ^WT 3T1^?T gr»*iw ^ 'S'ST ^I^Knq, ^Tll^l^Ko, f^Krll^y *11*1CTI tl>*1|Ct» •^200 3?n^r 'q^r (<i?Isq<i?) '^RnWRf^T (SinaleBench; Hon'U W.P. rsi (Petition U/A226 of Petitioner Respondents Smt. Chouhl bome^ Purani Vs 1. State Secre Rural (CG) 2. TheO The. Panch( 3. 05.02.2009 Mr. A.N. Bhakta, Advocatl Ms. S. Jain, P.L. for the Heard. Grievance of the petitiort recruitment exammation of Shi 2008, succeeded in the written Annexure P-3. The petitioner second counseling to be held on participate in the counseling as <shl14(d^'1 ^W^i ^ f^st "d^^R ^r^tRm^n^T e Mr. Justice bhirendra Mishra) 10.718/2009 he Constitution of India) Anupama Chouhan wife of Shani in, aged about 21 years, Occupation h'c Wife, resident of bhimarpur, Basti, Nagar Palika, Raigarh (CG) of Chhattisgarh, Through the •ary, bepartment of Panchayat and Development, b.K.S. Bhowan, Raipur llecor, Raigarh (CG) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad yat, Raigarh , bistrict Raipur (CG) for the petitioner. 1'ate. ?r is that she participated in the |ksha Grade-III held in the year ^xamination and her marksheet is \QS qualified for appearing in the 121.9.2008, however, she could not s|he did not receive intimation from f %^K ^ •''•--:•. : .•?VT/ '% ' ^'y^'X.l^J'KJ—^ > ^•'^i.^w!'^^' '3^r ^|^|<rl<4, ^Ti1<i^<o, fa<ni^< 3:n^ff'3FTR'(i<=h 'TOT OT^T si»*iicr» s-.- (J ^ ^ Wldl CT>*11<1» •Wf200 3n^?T TR^ ( yd^^T) ITIRTTW^tf?^ 2-^" respondent No.3. Thereafter, th^ of Annexure P-4 <& P-5 dated 3| her to participate in the 4 representations have not been d| is going to be held on 8.2.200( petitioner has prayed for a dire| the petitioner to participate in 8.2.2009. Qn the other hand, learn( that the representations of the In view of above submis; parties, this petition is disposed No.3 to consider the representa- petitioner and if the relevant petitioner to appear in the 3 c for recruitment of Shjksha Karm Consequently, I.A. No.l al; Certified copy today. cbNid<fl'1 ^l^<A* "^ 'fe^ <^i^i< '^sifW^TT^T petitioner made representations 10.2008 <& 2.2.2009 for allowing jbsequent counseling, but her ^cided till date and 3rd counseling In these circumstances, the :tion to respondent No.3 to allow ^he 3rd counseling to be held on d counsel for the State submits letitioner to participate in the 3rd counseling will be considered b^y respondent No.3 in case the relevant rules so permit. ions of learned counsel for the |)f with a direction to respondent ions (Annexure P-4 <& P-5) of the rules permits, may permit the |)unseling to be held on 8.2.2009 Grade-III ;t> stands disposed of. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge