1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1891 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 97 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr.S.S.Redekar for applicant. Mr.M.H.Chandan Shiv i/b M/s Khandeparkar & Associates for respondent. CORAM : K.K.TATED,J. DATE : 10/02/2011. PC: 1 Heard learned counsel for parties. 2 This civil application is preferred by legal heirs of original appellant Sudhakar Bhaskar Rane for joining them as appellants in second appeal no.97 of 2008. There is a delay of two days in preferring the present civil application. 3 The learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent seeks some time to file their affidavit in reply to oppose the civil application. It is to be noted that this civil application was served on respondent 2 on 30th September, 2010 but till today there is no affidavit in reply, therefore, application for time to file affidavit in reply is rejected. 4 Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on behalf of the applicant and the averments made in the civil application, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) which reads as under: “a) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to condone delay of 2 days in taking out present application; b) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to join the Applicants as Appellants No.1(a) to 1(c) in the place of Appellant since deceased in above Second Appeal No.97/2008 & to carry out consequential amendment.” 5 Amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today. 6 Civil application is disposed of accordingly. (K.K.TATED,J.)