---./- •••^_- n- Ri^y ftS'f, ^siiS.ss, B^sy' K—' 's INTHE HIGHOOURT OF JUIMCATURE AT HLASPUR WRIT PBTITIOII nro. ^i"^/ /aoofi FBTmONHl RBSPONiaaiTS ^- ^•'".•' 0^> A? / • V. ^' -^v ..-.-^ <!-r-'' ~T rai» 'Q't'v RAMSUDBiSAUU S/o-Shri Qanpatram Sahu, Agsd about 37 yeare, Occupation, F^twari Reeident of, Village Mainpur Taheil, Ambikapur, Dietrict Sarei.ua (C,Q.) •VEKS06- 1. ^^- 2. Stote BfChtartti^gimh Through the Secntaiy, Departmfint of Revenua, D.K.S. Bhaian, Mantralya Raipur.(C.O.) 'Ib»CcUectur- Rin®|jil, Land Reoord, Cbllectorate Ambikapur, Sarguja (C.Q.) 3. Srib- Divlriunl Olficcr Revenue, Ambikapur. Dietrict. Safgiua 4. Naimb'IhtMrildu ^ Darima Cirote Atnbikapur. 5. pnnniplal SnnnuBuni Patwari, Posted at Halka No. 39, Taheil oBice Ambik^>ur Dietoict Sarguja P.G,} 6. RunmBl nt^nni S/o Chaniruram manikpuri, Ags, not known, R/0 Maniour (Mathpara) Ambikapur .Diett. Saiguja. WRIT FBTI1IOII UNCffiR ARTICUS 226/227 CW THB CQNSTiTinraoN OF mou. FOR isaiAHCB OF vatsr m TJIB HATURB OP CEK'HORJUBI MMIDAMUS BTC JUfD VOSt wpBxspaiKrE.asfsssR/ ORIWTS, ^^'•^^-^•^.t^-^^S^'^.^i^S^ XI-HC-22 'TiET -qiqiinq, BTtltl'iS, (s|CII'Mll.< - siRW^il 'i?:ii^3iit?r sb*< '^feT •'y <4. S1<^ ^ r^ ,0 ->; 11*<CTI tht)ra»UJ^.\te>^c^f/e'^ •M fN^tT' aii^i •TOiiwgfei 24-1-2006 Shri Avinash K. Mishra, oounsel ShriSatishGupta, Deputy Gove No.1 to 4/State. Heard. By this petition under Article petitioner has chaiienged ttie order, Anrjexure P-1. The impugnedorder, Annexure P-1, was passed by the Sub-j made by Ramviias ivianikpuri tnat thi kidnapping and murder of his son. Th| the son of compiainant Ramvilas Manii^ Rs.5 Lakhs and t(iereafter committ.^ complainant. The case is going on anf compiainant. The repiy of the petitidnt repiy and thereafter the impugned orcler| Learned counsei for the petitiorli the petitioner's son is being prosecutec). the Sub-Divisional Officer has change): Patwari Haika No.16 to Patwari Halka donp under the facts and circumstanc^s. The impugned 'order has been passed in the exigency and for the adn(inistrative convenience keeping in view the administration ofjustice. Having considered, 1 am of the, tor intefference. No one administration of justioe. The writ petition faiis and is disr(iissed. Consequentiy,~wi.(W.)P.No.32'2^ "!! :;,,'TOlf?fghT •RIIRff -cf -fe^ <fa4<LK ^stPgirsniRT <)r the petitioner. - fiment Advocate for respondents 126/227 of the Constitution, the pjvisional Officer on a complaint petitioners son is involved in petitioners son had kidnapped Ipuri and demanaed a ransom OT |d murder of the son of tte the petitioner is tnreatening the ;r was cailed for. He submitted Annexure P-1 has been passed. , T couid not dispute the fact tnat By way of the impugned order, the work of the petitioner from |No.39. Realiy, nothing has been opinion that, this is not a fit case be aiiowed- to interfere in t'ne 2006 stands dismissed. Fakhruridin judge