^.^ ..^. G^ 1<^n3 Slnsi?eB®neh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.PJSJNO. Q>^>^ /2011 PETITIONER ^^ ..•<'-^•\"4.>"' ..<^-^y' \^"<^ <^"""" ' ^" Minketan Naik S/o Shri Bhuneshwar Naik, aged about 56 years, Headmaster, at Government Primary School Katangpali (B), Block Baramkela, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. ^StateofChhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, School Educatonal Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) /^&^ys^ 2. The Joint Director Treasury Accoutn and Pension Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur (C.G.) •rf-'-'^ 3. The District Education Officer, District Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Block Education Of&cer, Block Baramkela, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORA.RY OR ANY OTHER WRITOF LIKE NATURE ETC. HIOH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRTT PETmON (S) No. 3457 of2011 Maiketan Naik. RE8PONDENTS VERSUS State ofCMiattisgaito & Others. WRTF PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmjriON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Sattsh K> AenUiotel.J. Present: 8hri lAaai Ram Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawya* for the State/respondents. ORDER<ORAL^ (Passed on 01st day ofJuly, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel api»armgfor the petitioner, on instnK2tions, seeks pemiissioB offhis Court to witiidraw tiris petition witfi lifeerty to make a representation in fhe light ofcircular <lated 13.Q1.2QW and 05.01.2011 issued by tfie Govenun^rt of ChlmttBSga-h, Scho@l Education Department 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no ©bjeetion. 3. No permission ofthis Court is reqirired to make rq)r^i&ntation to fhe respondent aufhorities. Thus, such direction camiot b©issued, However, ifthe petitioner makes a representatioii to (he re^ond^nt authorities, tiie same may be consideped imd deeid^i in aecon&uKe wifh law, on its own merits and perspective. 4. With the aforesaid obs^-vatton, the writ petition fe ^smissed. Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge .Axnit