IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4752 of 2010 BHUNESHWAR MANDAL Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 09.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Husband basing compromise with his wife and mother- in-law has already been allowed anticipatory bail by the impugned order itself and petitioner’s prayer is refused on the ground of allegations that once he had undressed complainant with some ill motive for which no cognizance has been taken. The allegation under Section 379 of the I.P.C. is super addition also. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 1039C of 2006, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Jamui subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)