IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27739 of 2010 NAUSHAD KHAN Versus STTAE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 28.10.2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in a case under sections 395 and 412 of the I.P.C. The petitioner’s name surfaced in confession of co- accused and there is recovery of Rs. 98,000/- from him. However, the petitioner submits that the alleged recovered money was not booty, rather he had kept the said money for purchase of a piece of land. He does not have antecedent. Petitioner is in custody since 8.11.2009. However, other co-accused have already been allowed bail as mentioned in para 18 of the brief. Learned State counsel submits that there is recovery of loot money from the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner as above is refused with observation to renew the prayer for bail after five months. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)