IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.978 of 2007 JAIMALA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3. 18.9.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order. The grievance of the petitioner is that the court below has wrongly released the opposite party no. 2 under Section 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act. However, it appears from the impugned order that opposite party no. 2 has been convicted under Sections 323/341 I.P.C. Under both the Sections, maximum punishment is one year. There is no previous conviction. Therefore, the lower court was quite justified to release the opposite party no. 2 under Section 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act. I find no ground for interfere in the impugned order. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)