IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1449 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 26.05.2011 Yattan Kumar ... Petitioner versus Krishan Kumar ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Gaurav Singla, Advocate for Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. **** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.(Oral) Following order was passed on 08.03.2011: “Learned counsel for the petitioner has not pressed this revision petition on merits. However, he prays for some reasonable time to vacate the demised premises in which he is settled since 2003. Notice of motion qua this point only for 21.03.2011. Dasti only.” Counsel for the respondent submits that he would not mind if some time is granted to the petitioner for vacation of demised premises subject to payment of all the arrears of rent, which is allegedly due. This petition is disposed of with a direction to the tenant to vacate the demised premises on or before 28.11.2011 and furnish an undertaking before learned Rent Controller in this regad within 30 days CR No.1449 of 2011 (O&M) -2- from the date of this order and pay all the arrears of rent as alleged by the landlord and shall pay the rent of the ensuing months as well. In case of violation of any of the term of the undertaking, he shall make himself liable under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. May 26, 2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) sonia Judge