IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 454 of 2008 (M/B) Mahendra Singh Adhikari & another …… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ..…. Respondents Shri Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 / State Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 / State 2. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he does not want to press the CLMA No. 5319 of 2008. According, the application is dismissed as not pressed. 3. The learned A.G.A. has filed CLMA No.5875 of 2008 for condoning the delay in filing the counter affidavit. The application is allowed. 4. Learned A.G.A. has submitted that the investigation has been completed in this case; the Investigating Officer has found prima-facie evidence against the petitioners; the chargesheet has been filed before the court on 22/08/2008; and the case has been registered against the petitioners, as such, the petition has become infructuous. This fact has been stated in para 5 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 5. In view of the above, the writ petition has become infructuous. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order dated 18.06.2008 stands vacated. (J.C.S. Rawat) 10/09/2008 Shiv