1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Civil Application No.5782 of 2006. IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4206 of 2002. .......................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's Orders of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Register's orders. .......................................................................................................................... Shri VR Chaudhary Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Thakre AGP for Respondent no.1. Shri J. T. Gilda Advocate for R-2. CORAM : A. H. JOSHI & B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATED : 10/07/2007. 1. This application, for clarification of order dated 26-4-2004, is filed by respondents no.1 & 2. When the Writ Petition was admitted on 30-7-2006, this Court has not granted any interim order. It is further stated on 26-4-2004 that the Court orally directed respondents no. 1 & 2 not to make any recruitment, and that oral direction is still continuing. 2. Mr. V. R. Chaudhary Advocate, who appears for the petitioner, states that there was such oral direction 2 issued by this Court on 26-4-2004, and it continues even today. 3. Learned AGP Shri Thakre appearing for respondent no.3 also accepted that such oral direction was given. 4. Mr. Chaudhary Advocate, however, states that because of the present application for clarification moved by respondents no.1 & 2, the petitioners have also filed Civil Application No.1311 of 2007 seeking grant of seniority to the petitioner no.2 wife, and it is requested that the seniority of her husband i. e. petitioner no.1 should be given to her so that her chances of getting employment as Project Affected are accelerated. 5. Mr. J. T. Gilda Advocate for the respondent no. 2 states that there are some administrative problems, and he further states that in any case, such an application can be considered by the regular Bench. 6. We find that Civil Application for clarification is before us, and after hearing the parties, we find it sufficient to direct the respondents no.1 & 2 to keep one 3 post vacant in Vidarbha Region for accommodating petitioner no.2 so that in case, she becomes entitled to grant of such employment either because her Writ Petition was allowed or because her claim in W. P. No.4206 of 2002 is granted, same can be allotted to her. Thus, with the consent of the parties, we clarify that after this day, respondents no.1 & 2 are under only obligation to keep one post in Vidarbha Region vacant as directed above. 7. Civil Application is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE sbm