IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7170 of 2010 Date of Decision: November 01, 2010 Ajaib Singh Rahal and others …Petitioners Versus Rajinder Singh and others. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in view of dictum of Apex Court in the matter of Nedunuri Kameswaramma vs. Sampati Subba Rao , reported in AIR 1963 Supreme Court 884 , if both the parties have led evidence understanding well the controversy involved in the lis then lis can be decided by the Trial Court, as well as, by the Appellate Court, even if no specific issue is framed. Learned counsel for the petitioners further states that petitioner shall be happy if Appellate Court is directed to hear the petitioners on all the points including the points, which were sought to be C.R. No. 7170 of 2010 raised by way of proposed issues. Learned counsel further states he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with the above observations. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, learned Appellate Court is directed to hear the petitioners on all the points and to decide the appeal on all the points raised by either of the party before the Appellate Court including the points sought to be raised by way of proposed issues. November 01, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2