IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 17995 of 2008 Between: G.seetharamaiah, S/o. Pedda Ramaiah, R/o. D.No.19-1-23/4, Chintalachenu, Tirupati. ..... PET IT IONER AND The Andhra Pradesh State Handloom Weavers Coop. Society Limited., Central Office, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad. Rep by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action ofthe Respondent in not sanctioning retiral beneﬁts to the petitioner on his retirement from service on 30-6-2007 AN as arbitrary, discriminatory and cotnrayr to law and consequently direct the Respodnent to pay the retiral beneﬁts due to the Petitioner together with interest 2 24% p.a. w.e.f. 1.7.2007 and with all other consequential benefits and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.SURENDER RAJ Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.CH.JAGANNADHA RAO The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.17995 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled seeking a Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent in not sanctioning retiral benefits to the petitioner as arbitrary and illegal. There is no necessity of going into all the details. After ﬁling the writ petition, it appears that the respondent has taken a decision to grant all the retiral beneﬁts of the petitioner. In this connection, the respondent passed orders dated .8.2008. In view of the same, the cause in the writ petition does not survive as of now for adjudication and it has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, this will not preclude the petitioner from working out his remedies as available under law. No order as to costs. ____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 5.9.2008 DA THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.17995 of 2008 5.9.2008