IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- Crl. Misc. No. M – 28396 of 2009(O&M) Date of decision:- 19.4.2010 Jaswinder Kaur ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & Anr. ... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present:- Dr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Rajesh Narang, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana. Mr. R.K.Bansal, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Gurdev Singh, J (oral) It has been submitted by learned counsel for respondent No.2 that the complaint, for the quashing of which the present petition has been filed, has already been withdrawn by respondent No.2 and has been dismissed as withdrawn. Copy of the order of trial Court has been placed on the record. In view of that order, it has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the present petition be disposed of as having become infructuous without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to seek his remedy of claiming compensation from respondent No.2 on the ground of the filing of the false complaint. The petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. April 19, 2010 (Gurdev Singh) tripti Judge