1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.4176 of 2009 (Mahadeo s/o Jairam Pimple v. District Rural Development Agency) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri S.V. Bhutada, Advocate for Petitioner. Coram : R.C. Chavan, J. Dated : 6 th October, 2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This misconceived petition is directed against the order passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Akola, below Exhibit 90 in Special Civil Suit No.71 of 2003, whereby the learned Judge refused to stay the proceedings of the suit till the disposal of an application for taking action under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This application, filed in the suit itself and was subsequently independently registered – pertains to false evidence given by witness no.4 Ramkrushna Shalikram Ingle. Occasion for the Court to consider whether the witness has given false evidence arises only after the Court decides the suit. 2 There cannot be an interim finding of the Court that one witness has told a lie. Therefore, the learned Judge rightly rejected the application. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Judge. pdl