IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25613 of 2011 Manoj Nut, S/o late Bhikhari Nut, R/o Sakin, ITI Colony, P.O. and P.S. Betiah, District – West Champaran …. Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar ….. Opposite Party For the Petitioner :M/s Veena Rani Prasad and Vishal Saurabh, Advocates For the State : Sanjay Kumar, A.P.P. 4 21.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This application has been filed by the petitioner for modification of order dated 17.12.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 44058 of 2009, whereby the petitioner was directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family members. A supplementary affidavit has been filed today. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that none of the close relative or family member are in 2 position to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-. Further, the parents of the petitioner had died long ago and Sunita Devi, wife of the petitioner, who had sworn an affidavit in the aforesaid bail application has left the house for the reason best known to her. In supplementary affidavit, which has been filed on behalf of the petitioner today, a stand has been taken that one Ramchandra Sahani, as described in paragraph no. 3, who is a contractor of the locality under whom the petitioner was working as labourer, is ready to stand as bailor. One Inderpari Devi, wife of Sattan Nutt as described in paragraph no. 2 being the close friend of the petitioner is also ready to become the bailor. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that they may be accepted as bailors. Learned counsel appearing for the State does not have any objection. In above view of the matter, let the persons described in paragraph nos. 2 and 3 of the supplementary affidavit filed today be accepted as bailors upon proper verification by the court 3 concerned. Accordingly, the order dated 17.12.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 44058/2009 stands modified to the aforesaid extent. In the facts and circumstances of the case this application is allowed. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)