,^k BEFORE THE )N'BLE HIGHCOURTOF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR ®"BhBencB CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIU N0. 30^- OF 2011 APPLICANT RESPONDENTS (CONTEMNOF : ^R.K. Banachhor, aged about46 years, Son of Shri Kartik Ram Banachhor, Posted as Prindpal, Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Saraipali, District Mahasamund(C.G.), VERSUS Shri M.K. Raut, aged about 55 years, Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). Ms. Rita Sandilya, aged about 45 years, Deputy Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.), Shri. M.N. Rajurkar, Under Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.), CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER SECTIOhflZ QF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1971 READWITH ARTICLE^15 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA I-HC—78 '3T[^r ^r'f^tqF ^T^TT 3:H^T^TRN' .. /• ^ HiHCff WKIch '3^F •<ll^l<'l<l, ^>Til<H<i(o, f®ldl-(-fy ..^x1.. .<^.?..©..l±e^^/J n° ^F[200 ^n^r'TT5RFT (T|c)?^<sf<^r) '^TTW^f^f ^^ cni^f<n<flri 'W^ ^f f^zt Tf^f^K ^3tRPT3Tr^T SB : Hon'ble Shrnvianindra-R(ohan Shnvastava, J. 05-09-2011 i Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, cjounsel for the petitioner. Learned counsei for the pe\ filed by the petitioner registered d :itioner submits that the writ petition was s W.P.(S) No.4086/2010 chatienging the order dated 15/7/2010 on the grouhd that though the petitioner has not been transferred, respondent No.4 has been transferred and posted to the place, where the petitioner is posted. 4n 'nterim order was passed on 3/8/2010 directing status quo as obtained orji that day, shail be maintained. Learned counsel for the pendency of the aforesaid writ pe 3/8/2010, an order has been pas^ |3etitioner submits that now during the j:ition and operation of interim order dated ^ed on 25/8/2011, by which the petitioner on the ground that without the| appears that now the State Goji petitioner shall approach responc| take necessary steps in order to 3/8/2010 is complied with. If nol month from the date of receipt ofj at liberty to r6vive this petition. prnrppd nn transfpr pmfeeriiqg^j has now been transferred. He sui^mits that in view ofihe order of status quo granted by this Court, before pas^ing the order of transfer., the respondent ou.ght to have granted opportunrtyj it appears that interim ordejr was granted to the petitioner principaliy e being any transfer of the petitioner, respondent No.4 in the writ petiljion couid not be posted in his piace. It /ernment has passed fresh order. The ent No.1 along with copy of this order to msure that order passed by this Court on orders are passed within a period of one copy of this order, the petitioner would be The petitioner shall not be compelled to of order dated_25/8^01l (Annexure C/4) ^- 'g-^::^:^. f£: ^;^ s^^ 1 ^^s^ ^ fc^ ;%,-^^"- XI-HC—78 ^,\ HIHttT^^ich ^^ ^I^M^ ^Tll<w{^l<o, [®t^H^< ^ 6^^©^o-So^/c "?Ft 20d 3Tr^r TT^F (^crf35^f) 'yrT^f,'^ f^TF^ TT^TT 3?Hc^T sb^ich <. Deepil ^ ^cTFW^lf^T ^^ ^' tilt appropriate order^are passed passed inVV.P.(S). No.4086/10. The petition is finaiiy dispos^d off. <=M^f<n<flTi iHH^rf ^* f^t Tf^f^K ^'3tRFT3?T^T in compliance of order dated 3/8/2010 Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge