IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.558 of 2011 Sajnoor Khatun wife of Md. Nazmual Hoda, resident of village-Rautara, Plice Station-Rautara, District- kaimur Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Purnea 4. The District Magistrate, Purnea. 5. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Purnea 6. The District Superintendent of Education, Purnea 7. Block Education Extension Officer, Purnea East, Purnea 8. Block Development Officer, Purnea East, Purnea. 9. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat, Birpur Purnea East, Purnea 10.Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Birpur, Purnea East, Purnea ……………………… Respondents. ----------- 2. 27.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has come to this Court with the grievance that the authorities are not treating her transfer in the school, where she was transferred earlier. From the facts stated in the writ petition, no clear picture emerges as to what are the rights of the petitioner for transfer to another school and what steps were taken by her in the matter, except stating the facts that there is danger of her life and the distance being travelled by the petitioner from the school, where she is working. In the above circumstances, no specific direction can be 2 issued in favour of the petitioner. However, it is open to the petitioner to represent before the appropriate authority, who shall consider the same in accordance with law. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of in terms of the aforesaid observations and directions. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )