IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.88 of 2008 KRISHNAWATAR PRASAD, son of late Ramawatar Prasad, resident of Sonartoli, P.O. Siwan, P.S. Siwan Town, District- Siwan. ..... Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through Shri Anjani Kumar Singh, the Secretary Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2. Shri Anjani Kumar Singh, the Secretary, Higher Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 3. Shri Jai Ram Lal Mina, the Vice-Chancellor, Baba Saheb Bheem Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur. 4. Baba Saheb Bheem Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, through Sri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, the Registrar, District- Muzaffarpur. 5. Shri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, the Registrar, Baba Saheb Bheem Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur. 6. Shri Rajesh Chauhan, the Vice-Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Chapra, District- Chapra. 7. Jai Prakash University, Chapra, through Shri Ashok Kumar, the Registrar, District- Chapra. 8. Shri Ashok Kumar, the Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chapra, District- Chapra. .... Opposite Parties. ----------- 07- 30.06.2010 Heard Mr. Shubh Narain Singh for the petitioner, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Pandey, learned Assistant Counsel to Government Pleader No.15 for opposite party nos.1 and 2, Mr. Harendra Kumar Tiwary for opposite party nos.3 to 5, and Mr. Ajay for opposite party nos.6 to 8. This application under Article 215 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, has been filed by 2 the petitioner of C.W.J.C. No.7328 of 2005, for the alleged non-implementation of the order dated 7.12.2006, whereby direction was issued to the respondent authorities to make payment of the lawful and the admitted dues of the petitioner. The petitioner had superannuated from the services of the Jay Prakash University, Chapra, with effect from 31.7.2000, while he was functioning as Head Assistant. 2. The contemners have placed on record their show-cause, wherein it is stated that the entire lawful and the admitted dues of the petitioner have been paid, a position duly acknowledged by learned counsel for the petitioner. In that view of the matter, we do not feel the necessity of pursuing this matter any further. 3. This application is accordingly disposed of. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/