IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38125 of 2008 JAGDAMMI CHOUDHARY, son of Late Ramawatar Choudhary, resident of Village Mirjapur, P.S.Barahat, District Banka. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Ram Naresh Singh, son of not known, A.S.I., P.S. Barhat, District Banka, at present posted as A.S.I., P.S. Chandan, Distt. Banka. ---Opp. Parties ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr Surendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP For Opp.Party 2 : Mr Sanjay Kumar Jha, Advocate & Mr Satyaveer, Advocate ----------- 11. 12.5.2010 A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner and a counter affidavit on behalf of opposite party no.2 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and opposite party no.2 as also the State. This application is for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to opposite party no.2 vide order dated 22.7.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No.34819 of 2007. It is submitted that the petitioner, who was the complainant in Complaint Case No.1497/04, alleges that after the grant of bail opposite party no.2, who is the Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police, chargesheeted the petitioner in about seven cases and arrested the petitioner along with his sons. Not only this, opposite party no.2 also threatened the petitioner of dire consequences, for which the petitioner did not file any complaint case for substantive alleged offences nor filed any F.I.R., but, however, informed the concerned 2 Chief Judicial Magistrate by filing an application and, as such, the anticipatory bail granted to opposite party no.2 deserves to be cancelled. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that no ground has been made out for cancellation of bail since the grounds for grant of bail and cancellation stand on different platform; more so when there is no allegation of tampering with the evidence of the case in which opposite party no.2 was granted bail nor there is any allegation of misuse of the privilege of bail. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 has also filed a counter affidavit and has denied the allegations. Considering the submissions of the parties and their respective affidavits, I do not find any ground for cancelling the bail of opposite party no.2. Accordingly, this application is rejected. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)