IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4075 of 2008 Date of decision: 29.05.2009. Jagdeep Kaur and others ...Petitioners Versus Shingara Singh and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. P.S.Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. R.K.Battas, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harish Bhardwaj, Advocate for the respondents. S.D.ANAND, J. The impugned order does not at all notice that the vendor is father of the plaintiffs-petitioners. It also does not notice the allegation by the plaintiffs-petitioners that the land in suit was ancestral in the hands of vendor qua them and he could not have sold it off without any legal necessity. These two facets had a very relevant bearing on the disposal of the controversy pertaining to the levy or otherwise of the ad-valorem court fee. The impugned order is set aside. The matter is remanded to the learned Trial Court to dispose of the matter afresh after noticing the above quoted and other relevant pleas of the parties. The parties. through their learned counsel, are directed to appear before the learned Trial Court on 10.6.2009. The exercise of disposal of plea afresh shall be concluded within one month with effect from 10.6.2009. May 29, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge