^^/ ^ CA^ ^?1 Ql6() HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR APPLICANT Criminal Revision (PR) No. 2809 of2011 Rajesh Sutar S/o Shri Kamlakar Sutar, Aged about 52 years, R/o Kelkar ^Para near Bhain/i Bhawan, Police Station Ganj Mandi Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) NON-APPLICANT Versus Smt. Nirmla Sutar W/o Shri Rajesh Sutar, aged about 45 years, R/o. 5, Street, Chingri Para Supela, police station Supela, (Bhilai) District Durg (C.G.) Criminal Revision under Section 19 (4) of Familv Court Act 1984 Appearance: Mr. S.K. Dadssna, Advocate forthe applicant. ORAL ORDER (21.07.2011) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard. The matter is listed in default as the certified copy of the order dated 26.4.2011 has not been filed along with revision petition. Perusal of the impugned order would show that on a compromise entered into between the applicant and the respondent through counselor Shri Ashok Jaiswal, the applicant agreed to pay Rs.800/- per month as maintenance to the respondent and the matter was referred for orders before the Family Court. The Family Court, in presence of the applicant and respondent on the basis of above compromise deposed of Misc. Criminal Case No. 83/2011 and directed that the applicant shall pay the .maintenance of Rs.800/- per month to the respondents by depositing the same in her Bank Account of Allahabad Bank before the date of 26th of every month. Since the order is an agreed order and the same has been passed in preseilce of the applicant himself, 1 do not find any •^ ...'.\€^. 1 y/ -.,..-.x" ^'y^-. ^^y 2 {ff.0) Criminal Revision (PRl No. 2809 of 2011 illegality or irregularity in the order so as to interfere'nthe revisional jurisdiction. The revision petition, therefore, is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ^^•vb"