IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SA No.284 of 1992 BIBI KAMRUN NISSA & ORS Versus M.H.GUFRAN & ORS ----------- 19 10.7.2009 Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, the learned counsel for the appellants and M/s Raghib Ahsan, learned senior counsel and S.M. Shabbir Alam, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4. The appellants herein who were the defendants in the trial court have preferred this second appeal against the judgment and decree of reversal passed by the lower appellate court. From the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the appellants no substantial questions of law which is required to be considered by this court appears to have been made since his entire line of argument is based on Ext. ‘O’ which is a kirayanama purported to have been executed between appellants and wife of one Bansi Paswan. Both the courts below have found this kirayanama to be a manufactured document and the claim of the appellants of their right, title and interest over the property in dispute having been based on this kirayanama does not create any legal issue which is required to be considered by this Court. There being no merit in this appeal the same is dismissed. Spd/- (Abhijit Sinha, J.)