IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRL. REVISION NO.2256 OF 2010 Date of decision: 28.3.2011 Mohd. Salim ...Petitioner Versus Akbar and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr.Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate for respondent No.4. Mr.Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) This is a revision petition challenging the order dated 27.4.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palwal whereby rejecting the application moved under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a pending trial pertaining to FIR No.21 dated 30.1.2009 under Sections 302 and 120-B IPC read with Section 25,54,59 of the Arms Act, Police Station Hathin, District Palwal. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4 and Deputy Advocate General, Haryana fairly stated that order impugned is non- speaking order and learned Additional Sessions Judge has not made any observation in view of the judgment of this Court in Ranjit Singh vs. State of Punjab,Criminal Revision No.3126 of 2010 decided on CRL. REVISION NO.2256 OF 2010 -2- March 17, 2011 on the subject i.e. 319 Code of Criminal Procedure. All the learned counsel fairly stated that the order impugned be quashed and learned trial Court be directed to decide the application under Section 319 Code of Criminal Procedure afresh in accordance with law. The present petition is allowed. Order impugned is hereby set aside. However, learned trial Court is directed to pass a fresh order on the application, at its own merit, in accordance with law. March 28, 2011 (Alok Singh) kd Judge