1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application No.3025 of 2008 In Misc. Civil Application (Restoration) Stamp No.2245 of 2008 In Misc. Civil Application No.836 of 2007 In Misc. Civil Application No.1088 of 2006 In Writ Petition No.1043 of 2003 (Decided) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Shri S.A. Bari, Advocate for Applicant. Shri P.D. Kothari, AGP for R- 3. CORAM : A.M. Khanwilkar & R.C. Chavan, JJ. DATE : 6th June, 2008 1. Respondents, though served, have not chosen to counter the assertions made in the application. 2. Delay is reportedly only of 23 days. In view of the explanation offered in the application, we are satisfied that sufficient cause shown for condonation of delay. 3. Application is, therefore, allowed. Delay is condoned. JUDGE JUDGE pdl