In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh R. F. A. No. 1167 of 1990 (O&M) Date of decision : 16.12.2008 Bihari Lal (deceased) through LRs. ..... Appellant vs State of Haryana and another ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Alok Jain, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. The landowner has filed the present appeal for enhancement of compensation awarded for acquisition of land. Briefly, the facts are that land situated in Village Gurgaon, Hadbast No. 55, Tehsil and District Gurgaon was acquired vide notifications dated 22.3.1984 and 22.11.1984, issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, `the Act') for development and utilisation as residential and commercial area for Sector 12, Gurgaon. The same was followed by notification under Section 6 of the Act on 12.2.1985. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, `the Collector') gave award of Rs. 73,600/- per acre for chahi land, Rs. 60,800/- per acre for Magda/Banjar/ Gair mumkin /Paths /Tubewells/ plots and Rs. 40,400/- per acre for Gair mumkin khadans. The land owners filed objections which were referred to the learned Court below for consideration, who keeping in view the material placed on record by the parties, awarded compensation of Rs. 80/- per square yard. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the claim of the appellant is squarely covered by the judgment of this court in R. F. A. No. 2381 of 1990- Ram Kishan and others vs State of Haryana and another, decided on 1.12.2008. Learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, does not dispute this factual position. For the detailed reasons recorded in Ram Kishan's case (supra), the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms. 16.12.2008 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge