IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16671 of 2011 1. Name Chand Mandal S/O Late Lakhan Mandal R/O Village- Banga, P.S.- Bardaha (Sikti), District- Araria Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The District Magistrate, Araria 2. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Araria 3. The Block Development Officer, Sikti Block, District- Araria 4. The Officer-In-Charge, Police Station Bardaha (Sikti), District - Araria 2 4.11.2011 The petitioner who is a P.D.S. dealer within Sikti Block in the district of Araria prays for quashing of the notice dated 8.8.2011 contained in memo no.326 issued by the Block Development Officer, Sikti Block, District Araria whereby he has been directed to refund the undistributed rice (441 quintals) at APL rate which were allotted under SGRY Scheme. The petitioner submits that the respondents have not given the details of the allotment made to him. The petitioner disputes the quantity of rice mentioned in the notice. Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 would also govern the instant writ petition. This writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, 2 KHAN with the condition that the petitioner would either deposit 10% of the value of 441 quintals of undistributed rice at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within six weeks from today. The petitioner should also file a representation raising his grievance before the Block Development Officer, Sikti Block, District Araria within four weeks from today which would be disposed of by the authority concerned within further ten weeks. In the meanwhile, no coercive steps would be taken against the petitioner. (S.P.Singh,J)