IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 11002 of 2008. Decided on: 21 st December, 2010. Harinder Singh. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 no ________________________________________________________ __ For the petitioner. : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, DAG with Mr. J.S. Guleria, ASG. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : According to the learned counsel for the parties, the matter is squarely covered by the decision dated 25.09.2009, rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 2216 of 2007, titled as Babu Ram & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. & Another. 2. According to the learned counsel, the facts are identical, hence directions issued in Babu Ram’s case (supra) shall mutatis mutandis apply in the facts of the present case. The respondents- authority are directed to take action in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. 3. With these observations/directions, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 21, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No