^^yw^l^ J- BEFGRE THE STATE.AEMINETRATIVE _TKIBUEM,,_ BENCB_.&T J'ABM.PUR,. ORZGINALfiPPI.ICATION NO,A^T^_)2000. APPLICaNT NON-APPLICMTS Nlshesh Eatfe Bhatt, aged about 35 years, son of P»B.Bhatt, Sub Eng.tneer, &t present posted In the office o£ the Executive EngJ.neer, SetuDj.vi.sion, Bilaspur(BP). •Versus- 1. State of Hadbya Pradesh. througb th@ Secretary, Publlc Works Department, Hantralaya, Vallabh Bbawan, Bhcpal (MP). 2. The Chief Englneer, Publlc Works- Department, Setu Siriaan. Bhcpal (MP). 3. The Executlve Englneer, Setu Hirman Divj.sion, Bllaspur(BP) DETAILS OF THE APPLICATION &PPI.ICATION tTNDER SECTION 19 OF SDHINISTR&TIVE TRIBOMALS ACT, 1985. :-22 ^3 •<ii<<ici<<, 9fll^<i<». fqwi'yy «|*<M|sfr(ira? sn^r ira^ ..(^...'£.-..c-..s.?....L1^2. TPl, 200S~ f^y' i SD^T^T fei?'aii^i *'<i+ yRd 3n^i?(mw:-gfei ..il. i ginw^ 14.01.2010 alfc' When fbe laatter was caU for fh.e petitioner aad fhe rn.at second round, none had appean Shri Ajit Singh, Pauel Law Taking iuto cousiderationj ui the petition, fhe petition is. However, a liberty is reserved Court, if cause of action wholly A copy ofthis order be sej ^T'fei'rhT Twif 4 fe^ ^ROT ^'srf'tWsn^r sd out for hearing, none appeared 'EI was passed over. Even in fb.e :d for the petitioner. »'erfor fhe State/respondents. the nature of controversy iavolved lismissed for want of prosecutioii. to the petitioner to approach the ir partly survives. .t to fhe petitioner. ManindraMoltanjSiirivastaval 3adge ., I