1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Contempt Petition No. 165/2009 in Writ Petition No. 5959/2004 (D) Padmakar Kaduba Jadhao ..vs.. K. R. Pawar, Secretary, Pratibha Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and ors. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Mr. Kothale, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Vaishnav, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 & 3. Mr. Parihar, A.G.P. for respondent no.2. Coram: R. K. Deshpande, J. Date : March 15, 2010 1. This petition for contempt complains willful disobedience of the judgment and order dated 31.07.2009 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 5959/2004. Mr.Kothale, learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon para 3 of the said judgment, which is reproduced below. “3. Inspite of service, the respondent nos. 5 and 6 have chosen not to appear in the matter. In the circumstances, for the reasons recorded in the order dated 02.05.2005, we quash and set aside the order of transfer of petitioner to Ashram School and direct that he should be continued as Assistant Teacher in the school in which he was appointed.” 2 2. On the basis of aforesaid directions, Mr. Kothale contended that the pay fixation of the petitioner as a trained graduate teacher in Mahatma Jyotiba Fule Vidyalaya, has not been carried out. However, bare perusal of the aforesaid portion indicates that there is no such direction given by this Court to any of the respondents to carry out pay fixation of the petitioner as trained graduate teacher in the Secondary School. What has been directed is that the petitioner should be continued as Assistant Teacher in the School in which he was appointed. There is no dispute that the petitioner has been continued in the School in which he was appointed i.e. in Mahatma Jyotiba Fule Vidyalaya. In view of this, there is no substance in the present contempt petition. The same is, therefore, dismissed. J UDGE kahale