- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE REVIEW PETITION NO.8 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5942 OF 2008 Nandlal Kacharu Shinde .... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents Shri Gajanan P. Lasure for the Petitioner. Ms M.P. Thakur, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Ms Priyadarshini A. Birje for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. Shri Aniket P. Ranade for Respondent No.6. CORAM: BILAL NAZKI & R.V. MORE, JJ. DATED: 10TH AUGUST, 2009 P.C: We have perused the review petition. We have said that the petitioner was not eligible because he did not have the B.Ed. degree in Marathi medium. This was the condition, admittedly, in the advertised - 2 - notice. However, the petitioner contends that this condition was a forgery and as a matter of fact the rules did not provide that a candidate should have a degree in Marathi medium. If the petitioner feels that the advertisement was in contravention of the rules or was a result of any forgery, he is at liberty to challenge the advertisement. With these observations, the review petition is disposed of. BILAL NAZKI, J. R.V. MORE, J.