pETITIONER ”E1. Supriya Sahu, D/o. \ RESPONDENTS 1. WR Bilaspur (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Takhatpur, District— Bilaspur (C.G.) OF INDIA THE CONSTITUTION ‘\ THE HIGH comer OF CHHA'msaARH AT BILAsPUR Emsp No. éQ$G /2008 Shri Laxman Prasad Sahu, aged about 21 years, R/o. N_6ar Peela Maha] Ward No.8, Tehsil- Sakti, District Jangir Champa (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Panchayat 82; Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bh Raipur (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Bilaspur (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Takhatpur, District- v)” -v avan, IT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF \_‘ mm...sg943).§fifé§/.Q& In 200' ‘ 31mm (Wu) mm‘m WW WW aqwimm S.B: Hon’ble Justice Mr. Pritin er Diwaker 0307-2009: Mr. Sunil Otwani, counsel or the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, PL for the State/respondents. Counsel for the State poi s out that the petitioner has an alternative remedy to approach the Collector as the impugned order has been passed by respo dent No. 3. In View of the above stat ment, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw present petition with liberty to file appeal before the Collector. further submits that as he has filed the writ petition before this ourt, his appeal would be time barred; therefore the Authority ay be directed to consider the s point of limitation liberally. Accordingly, the writ peti ion is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. ln the eventuality of filing he appeal, concerned Authority will decide the same in accord nce with law and the point of limitation would be considered li erally; keeping in mind that writ petition was pending before this / / Sdl- l Judge . ” 7 Pritinker Diwaker l / t e