..M....&.s§3/.%........... mm m zoo m m (WEI) ammm aywm Sin le Bench; Honble J fice Dhirendra Mishra ‘ ’ M.P.No.4 43/1992 (Petih’on under- Arficle 226 & 27 of Cons‘ri‘ru'rion of India) ' . ‘- Rajkr‘ishna r‘wal, aged abou‘r 48 year‘s, son of Shri Gopi hna AgarwaL resident of Champa, Tahsil Chu , DisTr'ic’r Bilaspur, M.P. Bilaspur rs. nu Kochar', Advoca’ for The pefh‘ioner‘. r. Bhaskor Paasi, P.L. f The Sfofe. . 4. Tahsild ,Tahsil Champa, Distric? Bilaur. a sp 16.3.2009 M Re r . M y o eard. The pe’rifioner has filed f insfonf pifion forquoshihg of report date 8..197 (Annex P—1) prepared by fh Assis‘ran’r Land Measurement Officer, Bspur, which was subsequently accepted by the Nazul Officer, njgir, as also against the order daied 9.12.1992 (Annexure P2). passed by the Addiiiomi Commissioner, Bilaspur .Divisi n, Biiaspur .in Case No.22/ ‘Mi5ceilaneous/92-93 Village C ampa, Tehsil Champa whereby application of the petitioner u er Section 35 (3) df the Lan / s 2 Petiiioner a K s m a H h ef d 108 u e ia a Vs Pradesh, Resgondents 1. The ST fe of Madhya Depar‘rmen‘r, Vallabh Bhavan,’ hopal. Commissioner, Bilaspur 2. Addi‘rion I Commiss nary,Bilaspur Kor'ba, Districf 3. Addi’rionl Collecfor', WWW ammamia: Revenue Code, 1959 for r'es‘ror'a’rion of Revenue Case No.140/A- of prosecufion on 18.2.1990 as 3 dm‘ed 2.12.1992. Learned counSel for pe‘rifio er submi‘rs ’rhaf The applicafion for resforafion of above revenue ase has wrongly been dismissed ‘rhough fhe pe‘ri’rioner had suffici n’r cause for his non-appearance on 18.2.1990. In These circumsfa ces, fhe order of Annexure P—2 be se‘l' aside and fhe Addi'l‘ional issioner, Bilaspur be direc’red . to decide The ma’r‘rer‘ on merits in ccordance wi‘rh law. fa’re submi’rs fha’r he has no objection, if fhe Addi‘rional Com issioner, Bilaspur is direc’red To decide Revenue Case No.140/A—2 /88-89 on iTs own meriTs. ConsequenTly, The peTiTion i allowed, order daTed 9.12.1992 (Annexure P—2) passed by The Ad iTional Commissioner, Bilaspur in Case No.22 (Mi5cellaneous)/92- 3 Village & Tehsil Champa is hereby seT aside and The Addi ional Commissioner, Bilaspur is direcTed To decide Revenue Cas No.140/A—20/88—89 on iTs own meriT in accordance wiTh law ex 20/88—89 was dismissed for Wo well as demand no‘re of Annexure Learned counsel for ’rhe iTiously looking To The facT ThaT The maTTer reIaTes To The vear 19 2. d] _ Dhirendra M‘Sh‘“ CerTified copy as per rules Judge - n C m p . mm ‘ E200 mmqwagu) WWW ,MLg www Wlmg-K agmm.