THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO Writ Petition No.8733 of 2010 Dated : 20.04.2010 Between : Smt.C.M.Venkata Ratnamma … Petitioner a n d The Government of A.P. & others … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO Writ Petition No.8733 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner is Sarpanch of N.P.Kunta Gram Panchayat in Anantapur District. She filed instant writ petition challenging the action of the third respondent in not issuing “Work Commencement Order” (WCO) to the petitioner and for a further declaration that the WCO issued by the third respondent in favour of seventh respondent is illegal and arbitrary. N.P.Kunta Gram Panchayat was sanctioned the work of formation of road to W.B.M. G-II connecting other habitations or locality under estimated cost of Rs.9,57,226/- (Rupees Nine Lakhs Fifty Seven Thousands Two Hundred and Twenty Six only). The second respondent issued sanction order on 24.02.2010. It is the case of the petitioner that Gram Panchayat passed resolution on 22.03.2010 nominating the petitioner as “Work Executing Member” (WEM) and resolutions were communicated to third respondent. It is her case that ignoring the same, the sixth respondent convened a meeting of Gram Panchayat on 27.03.2010, in which, a resolution was passed nominating the seventh respondent as WEM. The third respondent issued technical sanction on 31.03.2010 and also statedly released WCO. Therefore, aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed the instant writ petition. The petitioner has annexed the resolution of Gram Panchayat passed on 22.03.2010. She has also filed resolution dated 27.03.2010 nominating the seventh respondent as WEM. The petitioner is aggrieved by this resolution basing on which the third respondent accorded sanction and issued WCO. Therefore, when the petitioner is aggrieved by the resolution of the Gram Panchayat her remedy is to approach the Government and seek cancellation of the resolution under Section 246 of Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. In this writ petition disputed questions of fact, whether the resolution dated 22.03.2010 is legal or resolution dated 27.03.2010 is legal and whether the said resolutions were passed or not cannot be gone into. If so advised, the petitioner may approach the first respondent herein. The writ petition for the above reasons is dismissed in limine. __________ V.V.S.RAO, J April 20, 2010 sur