IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.-T- No. 2920 of 2008. Decided on 25th March, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Dr. Kuldeep Acharya. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present writ petition, in order to enable his client to make a representation for the redressal of his grievance to the Principal Secretary (Ayurveda), Government of Himachal Pradesh. 2. Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation for the redressal of his grievance to Principal Secretary (Ayurveda), Government of Himachal Pradesh within a period of two weeks from today, as prayed for. Thereafter, the same shall be decided by the Principal Secretary (Ayurveda), in accordance with law and also on the basis of the pleas/grounds taken therein, by passing a speaking/detailed order, within a 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - further period of two weeks, after the production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. 3. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge March 25, 2011. (bhupender) - 3 - `