@~ ‘ HIGH COURT OF CHI-IATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B: Hon’ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra Writ Petition (S) No. 1980/2011 PETITIONERS : Smt. Uma Singh Chandel and others Versus RESPONDENTS : ‘ The'State of Chhattisgarh and others Appearance? Shri Suryakant Mishra, counsel for the petitioners. Shn’ Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORAL ORDER (1 504.201 1) Heard learned counsel for the parties. (2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instruction, 1 submits that the petitioners do not want to press this petition on merit at this stage, and prays for Withdrawal of this petition with liberty to make a representation in the light of the circular dated 05/01/201 1. (3) Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that if a representation is made, the same shall be considered and decided within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, in the light of above-stated circular. (4) In view of foregoing, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above—stated liberty. It is expected that the concerned authorities would consider and decide the representation, if any, as above, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the ’rfpresentation along with a copy of this order. However, it is made ' ar that thepetitioners claim regarding grant of dearness allowance, r3 § .21 ’ house rent and annual increment &om the date of their initial appointment are rejected because in similar order on. which petitioners have placed reliance no such order for consideration has been granted. Sd/w l Prashant kumar Mishra Judge