IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2011 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 3982 of 2011() ------------------------------------ CC.NO.173/2011 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, ERATTUPETTA .................... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED 1 & 2 ------------------------------------------------- 1. PRAKASH P.K., S/O.LATE KRISHNANKUTTY, PARAYIL HOUSE, POONJAR P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. AMMINI KRISHNANKUTTY, W/O.LATE KRISHNANKUTTY, PARAYIL HOUSE, POONJAR P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SHAJI THOMAS SRI.N.NAGARESH SRI.SHINE MATHEWS(VADAKKEKARA) RESPONDENT(S): STATE & COMPLAINANT --------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM- PIN-682 031. 2. SUDHA PRAKASH, W/O.P.K.PRAKASH, PARAYIL HOUSE, POONJAR P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-PIN- 686 581. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN R2 BY ADV. SRI.T.V.VINU THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts CRMC.NO.3982/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEX A1 COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET DATED 14/04/2011 FILED AGAINST THE PETITIONER. ANNEX A2 COPY OF THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT/THE 2ND RESPONDENT HEREIN DATED 12/11/2011, SIGNED AND DULY NOTARISED BY A NOTARY ADVOCATE. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.3982 of 2011 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of November 2011 O R D E R Petitioners are the accused in C.C.No.173/2011 on the file of J.F.C.M., Erattupetta. The offence alleged against them is under Sec.498A r/w 34 IPC. The de facto complainant, wife of the first accused is the 2nd respondent herein. She is represented in this Court by her counsel. It is submitted by both sides that subsequently the entire matter has been settled and that they are living together peacefully and happily. Affidavit has been filed by the 2nd respondent stating that the matter has been settled. In the light of the settlement arrived at, this Crl.M.C. is allowed. Further proceeding in C.C.No.173/2011 on the file of J.F.C.M., Erattupetta is quashed. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Jvt