AB 1567/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.K.MUSAHARY Heard Mr. J.Paul, learned counsel for the accused/petitioners as well as Mr. K.M unir, learned Addl. P.P.Assam. The case diary as called for has been produced. I have gone through the case diary. Although, the accused/petitioners, namely, Sri Mukul Da s and Sri Pradip Das have been named in the ejahar as accused/persons, from the case diary it appears that it was Sri Sujal Das, who actually committed the all eged offence of kidnapping. No material is found against the present accused/pet itioners. In view of the above, the interim bail granted by this Court on 8.6.10,in respect of the accused/petitioners, Sri Mukul Das and Sri Pradip Das, in connection with Tamulpur P.S.Case No. 90/2011 U/s.366(A)/34 IPC, is made abs olute on the same terms and conditions. The bail application stands disposed of.