IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 13TH JULY 2010 / 22ND ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 21839 of 2010(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHIJINA P. W/O.SURESH, AGED 28 YEARS,SANSKRIT TEACHER, SANKARA VILASAM U.P,SCHOOL, PO.MUTHIYANGA-670 691, KUTHUPARAMBA SUB DISTRICT, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM-1. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, TRIVANDRUM-14. 3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KUTHUPARAMBA PO,KUTHUPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT-670 643. 4. THE MANAGER, SANKARA VILASAM U.P, SCHOOL, POST MUTHIYANGA, KUTHUPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT-670 691. BY G.P.SRI.DILIP MOHAN FOR R1 TO R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ---------------------------- W.P.(C)No.21839 of 2010 ---------------------------- Dated 13th July, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner was appointed as a full time Sanskrit Teacher in Sankara Upper Primary School on 2.6.2008 as per Ext.P1. The post against which the petitioner was appointed was made full time by group `C' diversion. However, the said appointment of the petitioner was not approved by the third respondent. The petitioner has raised her grievances before the second respondent in the light of Ext.P6 Government order. However, the same was not properly adverted to by the second respondent and as per Ext.P9, claim of the petitioner was rejected, it is submitted. Aggrieved by Ext.P9 order dated 25.5.2010 of the second respondent the petitioner has now preferred Ext.P10 revision petition dated 15.6.2010 before the first respondent. Taking into account the pendency of Ext.P10 revision petition before the first respondent, this writ petition is disposed of without making any observation with respect to the merits of the contentions, with a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P10 expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, with WP(C).No.21839/2010 2 notice to the petitioner and the fourth respondent. C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS