IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC NO.324 OF 2010 ASHOK JAMADAR @ ASHOK MEHTAR JAMADAR, SON OF BIDESHI JAMADAR, RESIDENT OF MORGE FORM MADHUBANI, P.S. K.HAT, DISTRICT PURNIA……………………………………………………………….….PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PURNIA 3. DY. S.P. PURNIA 4. THE OFFICER INCHARGE OF K. NAGAR P.S. CASE NO.17/10…………………………….………RESPONDENTS ----------- 2. 04.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. It is an admitted position that petitioner’s son is an accused in K. Nagar P.S. Case No.17/2010 instituted under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner’s grievance is that in course of investigation, for arrest of his son, petitioner is being harassed by the police. Therefore, a prayer has been made for protection of the petitioner from the said harassment at the hands of the police. It goes without saying that in course of investigation, police has to take all possible steps for apprehending the accused and put him behind the bar. This is also clear that in the process, no innocent - 2 - person can be harassed by the police which the police may keep in mind while investigating the case. If the petitioner has any grievance against conduct of the police officials, he has liberty to approach before the higher police officials of the district for the purpose. This Court is not inclined to pass any positive order or interfere with the investigation in any manner. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. B.T (J. N. Singh, J.)