IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 30705 of 2009 Date of decision: 21.02.2011 Satya Wati and another ........ Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Kunal Chhoker, Advocate for Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana for the respondent - State Ms Gayatri, Advocate for respondent No. 2 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners have since been acquitted by the trial Court and the present petition is rendered infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 21.02.2011 mohan