IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 28TH KARTHIKA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1605 of 2008(S) ------------------------------- ( AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.19008/2008 Dated 08/07/2008 ) PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ------------------------------ LOVELY LAWRENCE, AGED 35 YEARS,S/O. LATE OMANA LAWRENCE, ARISSARIL HOUSE, THUMPOLY P.O., ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW JAMES RESPONDENT/FIRST RESPONDENT: --------------------------------------- SRI. JAMES VARGHESE , SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. SHRI MATHEW VADAKKEL. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T. SANKARAN, J. ........................................................................ CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (C) No. 1605 OF 2008 ......................................................................... Dated this the 19th November, 2008 J U D G M E N T As per the judgment dated 08.07.2008, the first respondent was directed to dispose of Ext. P10 Revision on the merits within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. This Contempt Case was filed on 04.11.2008 alleging that the direction in the judgment was not complied with. The respondents in the Writ Petition had filed an application for extension of time on 22.10.2008 as I.A.No. 13454 of 2008 and when that application came up for orders on 05.11.2008, time for compliance of the judgment was extended up to 15.12.2008. In view of extension of time for compliance of the directions in the judgment, it is not feasible to proceed with the Contempt Case. The Contempt Case is accordingly closed, leaving open the right of the petitioner to approach this Court , if and when occasion arises. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE. lk