IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA WRIT PETITION NO : 11634 of 1994 Between: E.Vijaya Laxmi, W/o. R.Jagannatha Rao. Hindi Pandit Grade-II, Aided Hindu Upper PRimary School, Atluri Bazar, Narsaraopet, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1.The Secretary to Govt., Education Dept., A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2.The Director of School Education, A.P., Hyderabad. 3.The District Educational Officer, Guntur. 4.The Manager, Aided Hindu Upper Primary School, Atluri Bazar, Narsaraopet, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaring that the petitioner is entitled for payment of due salaries in the grant-in-aid post w.e.f., 01/04/1992 in the fourth respondent Aided School by holding the action of the respondents in not releasing and paying the Legitimate salaries of the petitioner without any valid reason or ?Justification is as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and subversive of Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution and pass For the Petitioner: MR.CH.JAGANNADHA RAO, ADVOCATE. For the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court Made the Following: ORAL ORDER: Heard both sides. 2. The grievance of the petitioner appears that she was not being paid the salaries from the month of July, 1992. 3. On 29-06-1994, while admitting the writ petition, this Court in W.P.M.P.No.14133 of 1994 granted interim direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for payment of salary due to her from the month of July, 1994. 4. No information whatsoever is forthcoming, perhaps due to lapse of considerable time years together the said interim direction of this Court was complied with or not. 5. Hence, suffice it to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation made by the petitioner with regard to payment of salary from the month of July, 1992. 6. It is made clear that if no representation is on record, the petitioner is at liberty to make a fresh representation and upon such representation is being made, the respondents shall pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law and as per the G.Os., or guidelines etc., and communicate a copy of the same to the petitioner expeditiously. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 25TH JUNE 2004 D.S.R.VARMA, J KRK To: 1.The Secretary to Government., Education Department, A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2.The Director of School Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3.The District Educational Officer, Guntur. 4.The Manager, Aided Hindu Upper Primary School, Atluri Bazar, Narsaraopet, Guntur. 5.Two CCs to Government Pleader for School Education, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 6.Two CD copies. 7.One spare.