IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.2613 of 2007 Between: V.R. Kandriga Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society Limited, Satyavedu Mandal, Chittoor District and others .... PETITIONERS AND The District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District and another ....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.2613 OF 2007 ORDER: This Court issued Rule Nisi on 13-02-2007 and granted interim direction in W.P.MP. No.3362 of 2007. 2. Heard Sri P. Srinivas, learned counsel representing the writ petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition representing the respondents. 3. The writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus declaring action of the respondents in disbursing the compensation amount to the borrowers of the petitioners without obtaining the No Objection Certificates from the petitioners in pursuance to the Notifications and Declarations issued under Sections 4(1) and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in acquiring the properties situated in the villages covered by Sathyavedu and Varadhaiahpalem Mandals, Chittor District for the benefit of A.P.I.I.C., to establish a Special Economic Zone as illegal, arbitrary and opposed to the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964, Land Acquisition Act and Transfer of Property Act and consequently to direct the respondents not to disburse the compensation amount payable to the borrowers for the patta lands as well as assigned lands without producing the No Objection Certificates from the petitioners. 4. Several facts had been narrated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. 5. Several averments were made in the counter affidavit in paragraph No.4. It is stated that it is not correct to state that respondent No.2 is taking steps to disburse the compensation amount to the borrowers without deducting the due amounts payable to the petitioners. The payment was made duly after obtaining the No Due Certificate from the concerned PACS and DCC Banks. The same stand had been taken even in paragraph No.6 of the counter affidavit. 6. In the light of the same, this Court is of the considered opinion that the writ petition be disposed of directing the respondents not to disburse the compensation amount to the borrowers of the petitioners without obtaining No Objection Certificate from the petitioners in pursuance of the notifications and declarations issued under Sections 4(1) and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act in acquiring the properties specified in the writ petition. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ P.S. NARAYANA, J November 10, 2009 MD