'«^!^' 6^^'l6^r' «K- ^3^//SS BEP08E THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE THrBUNA.Li JABAEP0R. O.A. No.S&o 1 of 1993 APPLICANT Sumant Taran, aged 44 years, Son of Shri C.L. Taran, Oecupation - Gevemaent Serviee, Sales Tax Inspector, Rajnandgaon, VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1. State of Hadhya Pradesh, Through Secretary, Bepartment of Commercxal Taxatlon, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal. 2. ComBiissioner ot Sales ,Tax, Madhya Pradesh, Indoreo VL 5. Estanifc Las Tigga, aged 40 years, Asstf. Sales Tax Officer, ^ Sales Tax Offlce, Raipur. 4. B.R. Thawre, Asstt. Sales Tax Officer, Flying Squad, Sales Tax Office, Chhindwara. 5. R.L. Patel, Asstt.Sales Tax Offlcer, Sales Tax Offxce Cirele-I, Satna. 6. A»R. Koyal, Asstt.Sales Tax Officer, Sales TaxOffice, Jagdalpyp(Bastar), M.P. ..2. ^sfS'SS^- - 2 - 7. 8. < Hohan Say, Asstto Sales Tax Officer, Sales Tax Office, Ambikapur. N.S. 'Ehafcar, Asstt. Sales Tax Officer-, Sales Tax Offloe, Betuli, 9.. R.S. Barkam, Asst-t. Sales Tax Officer, Sales Tax Office, Shahdol. APPLICATIOH UNDER SEdION 19 OF THE ADHINISTRATIVE TRIBQWALS ACT, 1985 ^ HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Pttition fSl No. 853 of 2005 Petitioner Sumant Taran Versus Respondents State of Max&ya Pradesh (ncw Chfaattisgarh) & another '(SB: Hon'ble ShriSatish K. Agnihotri J.) Noae for the petitioner., Shn N. N. Roy, Paad Lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDERIorall ( P&ssed on this 9t;h day of November, 2009) Thc inatter is caUcd for Iiearing twice. On bofh the occasioxis none appears nor auy represeutation is inade on behalf of fhc petitioner. The petitioner inay not be iaterested in peosceuting ffae niatter. In wiew of fhc foregoing, fhe petition is disinissed fbr waut of prosecution. A copy ofthis order shall be sent to the petitiancr forthwifh. —°—-—~~ ' Tbalau