1 IN THE LHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4060/2009 Sayyad Akhtar Baba Mohamad Navab & Anr. PETITIONERS VS. The Municipal Corporation of Gr.Bombay & Ors. RESPONDENTS Mr.Shashipal Shankar ,Adv.for the petitioners Mr.M.M.Malvankar,Adv.for B.M.C. Mr.Balasaheb Deshmukh with Ms.Priti Tare i/b Bilawala & Co.for Res.3 & 7 CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J. DATE : 27th April,2009 P.C. . Heard finally by the consent of the parties. 2] This Writ Petition is filed against the order of the Trial Court dated 26.3.2009 rejecting the Chamber Summons preferred by the petitioners for the amendment of the plaint. It is the case of the petitioners that they being the original plaintiffs have filed suit for injunction that the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay should not demolish the suit premises and disturb their possession without following due process of law . By taking out the Chamber Summons 2 the petitioners wanted to amend the plaint and produce the documents to substantiate their claim of authorised occupation of the suit shops prior to 1/1/1995. In the Chamber Summons the petitioners have given the detail description of the documents which they wanted to produce by way of amendment. If in the pleadings the plaintiffs have led foundation then document if relevant can be considered for production. For the purpose of the production of the documents it is not necessary for the petitioners to amend the plaint. The learned Trial Court while considering this issue has rightly dealt with the legality of the amendment . Hence I find no merit to entertain this petition. However, the petitioners are at liberty to tender the documents and the Trial Court may on merit admit or reject the same. The petition is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. (Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar,J.)