c0! 3F” "*rr¢‘,:-7\{ra mrnn BVNO': .. ' ‘ :Xl. BIC.G./05 AS SPL‘w.’ xii) 1N ‘lhHLF‘IULE nu oFTygcoum FEES AGT 1870. APPLICANT /RE/SP0NDENT No.1 Ecy Elm .. . ggfgnmv :,1/' Harish Khanna, I” PETITIONER No. 1 5/ RESPONDENT NO. 2 PETITIONER NO. 2. M.c.c. No.‘30 £2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH smiwem d§/tate of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Urban Administration & Deveiopment DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh VERSUS RESPONDENT No.1 ,Aged about 45 years, 2V, Rakesh Khanna, aged about 40 years Both are S/o Late Shriram Khanna, R/o Station Road, Raipur (C.G.) 3,,»"THE NAGAR NIGAM RAIPUR, through its Chief Municipal Officer. w: Way” OMPLIANCE OF THE HON'BLE COUR ATED 6’3 11 2006 APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN C T' D ORDER PAssED IN w.P. N o SHUKLA vs. CHHATTISGARH AND ANOTHER! 53 ?3/éé RAM ESH KUMAR g ... 3 ‘ MFLC IANT ' KEisPGNDENT Kn. 1 RESPONDENT No.2 31-3-2037 staté Sacretaw W 5 I\ AMJ«:-+..H4-:A“ oi Chhattisgarh, through: T Department of 1' Irbq afxu ,.1 n urvrluylucut, 1 5mm“, Mami‘alaya, Raipur (OGIJ Hamsh Knanna, aged about 45 vears Rakesh Khanna: aged about 40uvears mL- m ,.~A n nu: u” tum agcu Nigam Ra.p‘.f, huuugh its ChLEf Municipal Officer. .. Advocam for the applicant/ State‘ ‘ §hr1 suslm Dubey, GO caunsel 101* the; applica t/ Siate S€eks to Withdraw the petition. 1 as withdrawn. SdF Dhifendra Mishra Judge !"I The paition is dismisse