1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 135 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 135 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 135 OF 2005 Ramesh Uttam Kamble ..Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. ----- Shri V.V. Purwant for the Applicant. Shri V.B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for Respondent. ----- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : JANUARY 17, 2005 DATED : JANUARY 17, 2005 DATED : JANUARY 17, 2005 PC :- PC :- PC :- . Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned APP fairly points out on instructions, that in so far as the present applicant is concerned, the allegations even if accepted as it is, that would at best be one of bailable offence. In the circumstances, the applicant is enlarged on bail on the following conditions. (a) The Applicant is enlarged on bail in connection with C.R.No. 107/2004, registered with Kalwa Police Station, Dist. Thane on executing 2 personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand only) with two local sureties in the like amount. (b) The Applicant shall extend full co-operation to the investigating officer as and when called upon as well as for early disposal of the trial. If the trial court is of the opinion that he is responsible for delay in trial that fact be recorded in the Rozanama, which can be a ground for cancellation of bail. (c) The Applicants shall not leave jurisdiction of the concerned police station without prior intimation to the investigating officer as well as to the trial court. (d) The applicants shall not influence the prosecution witness or tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner whatsoever. 3. Ordered accordingly. .....