IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.13372 of 2011 Date of Decision : July 28, 2011. Jaswant Singh and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.H.K.Brinda, Advocate, for the caveator-respondent No.3. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners are aggrieved by the eviction order dated 9.7.2010 (Annexure P-15) passed in a petition under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') which has been further upheld in appeal vide order dated 8.7.2011 (Annexure P-17). It is not in dispute that earlier the petitioners filed a suit under Section 11 of the Act, which was dismissed by the Collector as well as the Appellate Authority. Those orders were upheld by a learned Single Judge of this Court. The petitioners are said to have filed Letters Patent Appeal No.1044 of 2011 which they got dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file CWP No.13372 of 2011 [2] a review application before the learned Single Judge. The petitioners have filed a Review Application No.282 of 2011 in Civil Writ Petition No.16375 of 2010 which is yet to be listed. The grievance of the petitioners is that while they are pursuing their one or the other legal remedy, the warrants of possession have been issued and they apprehend their dispossession at any time. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the caveator-Gram Panchayat, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Registry of this Court to list the above- mentioned Review Application before the learned Single Judge at the earliest but not later than one week from today subject to removal of objections etc., if any. Learned counsel for the respondent-Gram Panchayat undertakes that till then no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioners. Suffice it to mention that in case the petitioners succeed in their review application and/or their suit under Section 11 of the Act is decreed, the eviction orders passed against them under Section 7 of the Act would automatically become redundant. Dasti. July 28, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE