1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 138 /2010 [Anthony Rubin Danial vs. State of Maharashtra ) ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr Parag Ukey Adv. for applicant Mr A S Fulzele, APP for Respondent CORAM : A.P.BHANGALE, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 11, 2010. Heard. 2 Learned Advocate for the applicant prays for grant of bail in respect of Crime No. 11/2010 registered at Pratap Nagar Police Station, Nagpur for offence punishable u/ss 143, 147, 149, 394, 363, 324, 427, 504, 506 of IPC. It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that the applicant had already undergone police custody remand for a total of four days as permitted by the Remand Court; while he is in custody since 11.1.2010. It is further contended that co-accused, by name, Samsung Adamkar & Ashish Naidu have been released on bail. He further stated that the applicant is 21 years old. It also appears that the alleged incident had occurred under the circumstances disclosed by Mrs.Sony Anthony Danial, wife of the present applicant, in which the applicant was provoked to enter into quarrel with the first informant. It is further contended that the first informant had tried to falsely implicate the applicant in 2 various accusations due to personal vendetta which according to applicant, is false. 3 Learned APP vehemently opposed grant of bail on the ground that the applicant had entered into the premises of the Institution with 8 to 10 persons and had damaged furniture by entering into quarrel with the first informant. It is also alleged that the accusations are serious and, as such, bail be refused. 4 Considering the material collected during the investigation so far, more particularly the statements recorded by the police from the wife of the present applicant, I am inclined to grant conditional bail in favour of the applicant. Hence the following order is passed: The applicant be released on bail, in connection with Crime No.11 /2010 registered at Pratap Nagar Police Station, Nagpur upon executing PR bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one or more sureties in the equal amount; with further conditions that the applicant shall attend the I.O. as and when required, so also the trial on each date of hearing. He shall inform fixed address with telephone/cell phone number, if any, to the I.O. as well as the Presiding Officer of the Court below; and shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner. Application stands disposed of. Humdast allowed. JUDGE sahare