IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4132 of 2011 In Miscellaneous jurisdiction Case No. 636 of 2011 In Second Appeal No. 181 of 2010 With I.A. No. 5105 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Most. Malti Devi W/o late Birendra Singh 2. Nishant Kumar Singh S/o late Birendra Singh 3. Vikash Kumar Singh S/o late Birendra Singh 4. Amit Kumar Singh Minor then Malti Devi 5. Vikki Kumar Singh S/o late Birendra Singh 6. Yogendra Singh S/o Dharam Nath Singh 7. Dwarika Singh S/o late Dharam Nath Singh 8. Renu Singh W/o late Surendra Singh 9. Dhiraj Kumar Singh 10. Rajat Kumar Singh 11. Roni Kumari 12. Sukhchi Kumari, petitioners 9 to 12 are S/o late Surendra Singh, minor through then mother Renu Kuimari .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. Kashi Nath Bhagat 2. Swaminath Bhagat 3. Prabhunath Bhagat 4. Satyendra Bhagat 5. Shambhu Bhagat, all are S/o Ram Sakat Bhagat 6. Girija Devi W/o Ram Sakat Bhagat 7. Kunti Devi 8. Kanti Devi both D/o Ram Sakat Bhagat 9. Jagtavan Devi W/o Ram Sakat Singh 10. Bittu Kumar Singh 11. Pentar Kumar Singh, both are S/o of late Chandrika Prasad Singh 12. Sarika Kumari 13. Sabita Kumari 14. Babita Kumari, O.P. 12 to 14 are D/o Ram Sakat Bhagat, Minor thorugh then mother Jagtavan Devi .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advoate For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 4 05-09-2012 Despite valid service of notice, opposite party nos. 1 Patna High Court MJC No.4132 of 2011 (4) dt.05-09-2012 2/2 to 5 and 7 to 14 have chosen not to appear and contest this matter seeking restoration of M.J.C. No. 636 of 2011, which stood dismissed due to non-compliance of Court’s order dated 11.5.2011. In the facts and circumstances and for the reasons disclosed in the application, the present application stands allowed. M.J.C. No. 636 of 2011 stands restored to its original file. Question of substitution of deceased opposite party no. 6 shall be considered in M.J.C. No. 636 of 2011, and if that is allowed, then finally in S.A. No. 181 of 2010. I.A. No. 5105 of 2012 stands disposed of with above observations. RPS/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)