1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Bail Application No. 7358/2010 Anil Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan 11.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr SK Singodia - for the petitioner Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the matter thus petitioner may be granted benefit of anticipatory bail. Learned PP, on the other hand, has opposed the bail application. He submits that case has been registered for the offence under sections 399 and 402 IPC and challan has been filed with the help of provisions of section 299 CrPC. After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of 2 this case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. However, petitioner is given liberty to surrender before the court below and file bail application, which may be decided by the court below expeditiously and, if possible, on the same day. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma