1 t ANNEXURE -A/1 -^-TO^?°t ;~'-f-0, F!-w-y., -•^'•^^~ ^ IN THE M.P. STATE AENINISt-ftAraVB-TRTtiUN-Ar i^^f >) 36 lj W^B'maH AT - RApUR APPLICAr.!? BETWEEN 1 M. °. i^ ^'^ T'ibwa/. j s RA^t AGE -38 YEARS SON OF SHRI BABRI PRASAD DIS1ISSED NIL PRAHARI - (CONSTABLE) FBOM -0/0 SUB - JAIL,©HAMTARI R/0THROUGH - SHRI BI-E.;DHAR PRASAD SHAB4A SHARMA SA MILL PACHPEDI NAKA, RAIPUR TAH. & BIST. - RAIPUR(G.S.) - VEBSUS RE®ONDENTS s 1.STATE-OF CHHATFISGARH THROUQH THE SEGRBTARY MINISTRY OF HfflE B.g.S. BHAWAN,RAIPUR 2. INSPECT®GENERAL GF JAIL B.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR CHHATTISGARH 3T SUPERINTENDENT OF JAIL BISTRIGT - SAR©UJA(C.G.) DETAILS OF APPLieATION . . ^ 1. PARTICULARS OF THE APPLICANT; . As above in cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE"RE@1QNDENTS s . As above In caase ti-tle. 3. PARTIGULARS OF THE ORDERASAINST WICH APPLICATICT.J IS BEING MADE s l) ©RB®M©. : 1B/ESTT. WNEXURE-A/1 : 23.5.2000 ii) BATE iii ) PASSED BY SUP ERIMT ENDQn OF JAIL, AMBIKAPUR(SAaGUJA)<G .G .:). "iisir' Ei ^iiii ^S^' i i ^i sn^TwfiFiTO ^n 3(TI^?T sh+fl4> Tumane *W1<tI ^*(!<i9 s^ •<I!<IKI^, ®Til-M'is,f^cni'yy _^.i).^^JUli^/6£ w% STl^I ^^ ('j'lt^lSt) ^nw ^ifta ai^i SB: Hon'Me Shri Nlaiundra Mohan ShHvastawa. J tie befen decklW 07^7-2010 Shri R. K. Kesharwani, counselfot-ihe Shri Satish Gupta, Govt Advocat^ Heard. Learned counsel appearing for order of penalty, a statutDry appeal ha|s authority, butwhen the samehhs not year 2001, and since then, this matter is <er Respondents have neilher On the other hand, submission of learnetl date, no instrydions have been receh/ed.l On 23-03-2010, at the request c|f one opportunity of flting relum was 2010, again time was granted. Even now| tt is fbund that the is pending before the respondent ChhatBsgarh. Respondent No.2 is direcl^d the petltioner in accoidance witti the rula^ within date of receipt of a copy ofthis onler. In decision, itwould be open fbrthe pelitio<ier may be available to hlm under the law. shallgive hirn an opportunty of hearing Wifh the aforesaid directton, ttie gran|ed +i<ifi'i4!-i *<w<"i( 4'fe^t<l«i«(i< ^affmsii^t petUioner. for the Statefrespondents. peffioner submte ttiat against ttie been preferred before the appellate deckled, this pefiUon was filed in U)e ennained pending. B)e appeat nor have filed any retum. counsel fbr the respondents isthattill tearned counsel for the respondents, to tile retum. Thereafter, on 30-04- n6 retum has been filed. statutory appe{il preferred agairst Bie order of penatty N(j.2-lnspectar General (tf Jail, Raipur, to consider and decye the appeal of a period oftwo months from flie jcase, the petidoner is aggrieved by any ID take recourse to legal remedy as tflpetitioner seeks, Ihe appeltate authwity also. p^lition isfinallydisposedof. Sd^.;::': :,,v.-:,::,:. ManindraMoUan ShN%aStaya Judge "''%,; ,. ^^ia-iS^vfSSS.tS.^SSS: wu'&v ^iftT saireT, ira'-inprhr —FS?r47—2/2010 —i,oo,ooo. ^^•ffSG^S^f^^.