IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 24TH AUGUST 2007 / 2ND BHADRA 1929 CRP.No. 789 of 2007() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 06/08/2007 IN EA 30/2003 IN EP 7/2001 IN OS.331/1997 of MUNSIFF COURT,HARIPAD .................... PETITIONER/CLAIM PETITIONER -------------------------------------- RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR, S/O.KUMARAN NAIR CHAVARICKAL VEEDU, CHATHINAMKULATHIL CHERIYIL, KILIKOLLUR PANCHAYAT, KOLLAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.C.JAYACHANDRAN (KAYAMKULAM) SRI.K.S.SAJEEV KUMAR RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS ---------------------------------- 1. SANKARAN NAIR, S/O.KUMARAN NAIR VIRIYANA VEETTIL, AYAPARAMBU MURI CHERUTHANA VILLAGE. 2. SREEKUMARAN NAIR, S/O.KUMARAN NAIR THEKKEVIRIYANA VEEDU, AYAPARAMBU MURI CHERUTHANA. 3. THULASI S. KUMAR, W/O.SREEKUMARAN NAIR THEKKEVIRIYANA VEEDU, AYAPARAMBU MURI, CHERUTHANA. BY THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Order on I.A.No.2121/2007 in C.R.P.No.789/2007 24.8.2007 Dismissed Sd/- M.Sasidharan Nambiar Judge /true copy/ P.S. To Judge M.Sasidharan Nambiar,J. C.R.P No.789 of 2007 Dated this the 24th day of August, 2007 O R D E R This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the dismissal of a petition filed under Rule 98 of Order XX1 of Code of Civil Procedure. Under Rule 103 of Order XX1, the order is to be treated as a decree and “have the same force and be subject to the same conditions as to an appeal or otherwise as if it were a decree”. When an appeal is provided no revision will lie. Hence the revision petition is dismissed as not maintainable with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order in an appeal. Return the original order of the executing court to petitioner. M.Sasidharan Nambiar Judge tpl/- M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. --------------------- CRL.R.P.NO. /97 --------------------- ORDER MARCH,2006