IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARILAL WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 18TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 16428 of 2011(C) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. BEEVI.K.I,AGED 47 YEARS, W/O.ABDUL MAJEED,H.NO.7/426,PAINGA MADAM, MARAKADAVU, MATTANCHERY VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. ABDUL MAJEED,AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.ABDUL MAJEED,H.NO.7/426,PAINGA MADAM, MARAKADAVU, MATTANCHERY VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. ABDUL MANAF,AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.ABDUL MAJEED,H.NO.7/426,PAINGA MADAM, MARAKADAVU, MATTANCHERY VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.O.MUHAMED SHEMEEM RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, MATTANCHERY POLICE STATION, MATTANCHERY, KOCHI-2. 2. T.Y.ASHRAF,AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O.YAHU,H.NO.3/473,KANIYANTHURITHI PARAMBU, MATTANCHERY VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK,ERNAKULAM -02. 3. ASHKAR,AGED 23 YEARS,S/O.T.Y.ASHRAF, H.NO.3/473,KANIYANTHURUTHI PARAMBU,MATTANCHERY VILLAGE,KOCHI TALUK,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-02. 4. ANSAR,AGED 22 YEARS,S/O.T.Y.ASHRAF, H.NO.3/473,KANIYANTHURUTHI PARAMBU,MATTANCHERY VILLAGE,KOCHI TALUK,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-02. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN R2 TO R4 BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/11/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.16428/2011 C APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD. 12/02/2011 FILED BEFORE THE MAHAL JAMATH i.e., KOCHANGADI JAMATH PALLY (CHEMBITTA PALLY), KOCHANGADI,KOCHI - 2. P2: COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.P.NO.650 OF 2011 OF FAMILY COURT AT ERNAKULAM. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & K. HARILAL, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No.16428 OF 2011 ------------------------ Dated this the 9th day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. No representation for the petitioners. The learned Government Pleader Sri.Dhanesh Mathew Manjooran submits on the basis of the instructions that the accusations of harassment raised by the petitioners are without any basis. Wife of the 3rd petitioner filed a complaint. The complaint was to the effect that the 2nd petitioner exerted criminal force against her and attempted to out rage her modesty. Attendance of the petitioners was called for in connection with investigation of that crime. We are convinced that action of the police cannot be branded as harassment. The writ petition is dismissed. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE K. HARILAL, JUDGE. dpk