IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24217 of 2010 1. Baij Nath Yadav 2. Dashrath Yadav Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 16.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned P.P. for the State. Allegation against petitioners is that they and other accused assaulted the victim with deadly weapons aiming vital parts of the body. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that the aforesaid occurrence took place on account of land dispute and almost all the injured received simple injuries but I am not at all convinced with the aforesaid submission. Case diary reveals that altogether four persons sustained simple injuries in the aforesaid occurrence and some persons got grievous injury on the vital party of their bodies. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as this aspect of the matter that there is specific allegation of giving Kudal and Lathi blow, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to petioners. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail in connection with Supaul P.S. Case no. 339 of 2009 is rejected. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J))