IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-9852 of 2010 Date of Decision:9.4.2010 Gian Kaur and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. B.S. Aulkh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. Vikas Bali, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) The present petition was filed for quashing of FIR on the basis of compromise Annexure P-2. However, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3 have filed their reply stating therein that the matter has not been compromised. In view of the reply filed by respondents No.2 and 3, the present petition is dismissed. 9.4.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE