® IN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Writ Petition (C) For For CIVIL JURISDICTION 2110 No .......................... ""..." ..... ' .............................. Of 20" ..... Appellants (s) M/S PRASAD & COMPANY (PROJECT WORKS) LTD. & ANOTHER Petitioner (S) Versus STATE 0F SIKKIM & ANOTHER Appellant Petitioner (Advocate (s)) Plespondent Opposite Party (Advocate (s)) Bespondent (s) Opposite party (s) MR. A. K. UPADHYAYA, SENIOR ADVOCATE MR DHURBA TEWARI, MR. ASHIM CHETTRI, MS. BINITA CHETTRI AND MR.THUPDEN G. BHUTIA, ADVOCATHS MR. J. 8. PRADHAN, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL MR. KARMA THINLAY NAMGYAL,GOVT. ADVOCATE MR. SANTOSH KR. CHETTRI, ASST.GOVT. ADVOCATE Serial No. Date Order (s) with Signature (s) 1 2 3 01. 2.05.2010 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. P. WANGDI ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEMr.A.K,Upadhyaya,learned Senior Advocate, appearing on behalf of the petitioners sought permission to make a mention of a matter of an urgent nature pertaining to a tender process which was also the subject matter in an earlier writ petition being Writ Petition(C) No.20 of 2010, SGPG-1/ High Courv 2000 Nos./ 2.4.2009 Case No No ` 91| 2rfflo Serial No. Order (s) with Signature (s) He submits that copies have been served upon the State respondents through the office of the learned Additional Advocate General this morning. Mr. J. 8. Pradhan,- learned Additional Advocate General who is in Court, acknowledges the fact that the copy indeed has been served on him this morning, However, he prays that the matter be listed at 1.00 p.in. in order to enable him to seek necessary instructions from the department concerned. Let the writ petition be registered. Registry is directed to take necessary steps in this regard. List at 1.00 p.m' SGPG. 3/ High Courv 5000 Nos./ 2.4.2009