IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.10030 of 2011 Date of Decision : June 01, 2011. Namit Kumar .....Petitioner versus Punjab Public Service Commission .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Amit Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.J.S.Puri, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.J.S. Puri, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioner seeks quashing of the impugned communication issued by the respondents declaring the petitioner ineligible for PSCSCC (Main) Examination, 2009. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties at ad-idem that the controversy involved in this case stands settled by a Division Bench of this Court in LPA No.1741 of 2010 (Rakesh Kumar CWP No.10030 of 2011 [2] Popli versus The State of Punjab and others), decided on 21.12.2010. The present writ petition is also disposed of in terms of Rakesh Kumar Popli's case (supra). Dasti. June 01, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE