IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.11428 of 2011 Harikesh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Ms.Anju Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner had earlier approached this Court in the year 2005. This court directed the respondents to decide the legal notice served by the petitioner for his transfer on the ground that he is 80% handicapped. The directions were to decide the legal notice within a period of two months. As per the petitioner, the legal notice is still pending and has not been decided. The petitioner has waited for too long to again approach the court. The petitioner has allowed this position to continue for a period of over five years. He cannot be heard at this stage to seek that his legal notice be decided. Even otherwise, transfer is an incidence of service and would not call for any interference. Dismissed. At this stage, counsel seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. That prayer is also declined. July 06, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE