.{1}. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.122 OF 2008 IN CRIMINA APPEAL NO.763 OF 2004 Mr.Laxman Ramchandra Thorat. ..Applicant. Versus State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .. Ms.Pratiksha Mohite, Adv. with Mr.Pratap Patil, Adv. for the Applicant. Mrs.A.A.Mane, APP, for the State. .. CORAM : S.B.MHASE AND CORAM : S.B.MHASE AND CORAM : S.B.MHASE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : MARCH 05, 2008. DATED : MARCH 05, 2008. DATED : MARCH 05, 2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant has been convicted under Section 302 of IPC for causing death of his wife Laxmibai. The applicant is now seeking bail. 3. The evidence on record shows that the applicant took out the dead body of his wife Laxmibai where it .{2}. had been thrown near the Islampur Christian Church. The applicant-accused has also made an extrajudicial confession before the complainant. The evidence of witnesses show that prior to this incident also the applicant had assaulted his wife with a blade (vastara). Besides this, the evidence of other witnesses shows that just few days prior to the offence, the applicant was assaulting his wife and abusing her as he had suspicion in his mind in respect of the character of his wife. On perusal of the evidence, we find that there is sufficient material which connects the applicant with the crime. Hence we do not think that this is a fit case to grant bail. 4. Application for bail is rejected. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [S.B.MHASE,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [S.B.MHASE,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [S.B.MHASE,J.]