IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.10287 of 2010 Date of decision : 27.05.2010 Ashok Kumar Parmar and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL **** Present: Mr. J S Dahiya, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioners have approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for promotion under the 6% quota, provided to them vide office order No.28/EBG-450 dated 20.01.1979. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners have served a legal notice dated 5.4.2010 (Annexure P-6), ventilating the claim as set up in the writ petition on which no action has been taken so far. He further states that at this stage, the petitioners shall feel satisfied in case a time-bound direction is issued to the respondents to consider and decide the legal notice (Annexure P-6). In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the concerned respondent to consider and decide the legal notice (Annexure P-6) by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. May 27, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) atulsethi JUDGE