1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 50 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6804 OF 2008 Bhaskar Pandurang Hiwale Education Society and another ...Petitioners Versus Vasant Manaji Kamble and others ...Respondents ..... Mr. A.K. Gugale, advocate for the petitioners Mr. V.S. Bedre, Advocate for the respondents ..... CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. DATED: 20TH OCTOBER, 2010 PER COURT:- 1 Mr. Gugale learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Bedre, learned counsel for respondents, across the bar, have submitted a joint pursis duly signed by both of them. The said pursis is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification purpose. 2 Both the counsel for the petitioners as well as the respondents agree to dispose of this contempt petition in view of the contents in the said pursis. The respondents judgment debtors are directed to remain 2 present personally that too punctually during the conclusion of inquiry under Order 21 Rule 40 of C.P.C. in Special Darkhast No. 41 of 2006, which includes cross examination of petitioners and his witnesses, if any. The executing Court is directed to conclude the inquiry within a period of three months from today. 3 With the above observations, this contempt petition stands disposed of. Notice discharged. ( S. S. SHINDE. J.) rlj/