The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.26785 of 2011 Date: 27.10.2011 Between: Katragadda Venkata Ranga Rao ..... Petitioner AND The Divisional Engineer, APSPDCL, Machilipatnam, Krishna & another. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.B.Kamalakara Rao Counsel for the respondents: Mr.S.V.Ramana for Mr.O.Manohar Reddy, SC for APSPDCL The Court made the following: Order: The grievance of the petitioner, in short, is that despite his request to the respondents to incorporate his name for the electricity service connections bearing Nos.245 and 6222201009028 and a representation made, in this regard, on 18- 06-2011, respondent No.1 has not disposed of the same. At the hearing, Sri S.V.Ramana, learned Counsel, representing Sri O.Manohar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for APSPDCL / respondents, submitted that the Assistant Divisional Engineer, APSPDCL, Machilipatnam, is the officer concerned to entertain and decide on the Petitioner’s representation. In my opinion, respondent No.1 ought to have made over the petitioner’s representation to the Assistant Divisional Engineer, APSPDCL, Machilipatnam, instead of driving the petitioner to make a fresh representation. In this view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.1 to forward the petitioner’s representation to the Assistant Divisional Engineer, APSPDCL, Machilipatnam, Krishna District, with instructions to him to consider and take a decision thereon within a period of two weeks from the date of its receipt. As a sequel, interim order, dated 27-09-2011, is vacated and WPMP.No.33068 of 2011 is disposed of. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 27th October, 2011 LUR