®^Be^ IN THE MGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PEITTION fS) N0. ^<fct€> QP 2010 PETTTIONER ^ly ^•'A'<A RESPONDETCTS Dr. I^amendra Kiunar S/o Shri Narayan Prasad , aged about 35 years, occupation service, Ayurvedic Doctor , Qovenunent Ayurvedic Hospital, Bhusu, Block Sitapur, Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG). VERSUS 1. State of, Chhattisgarh, fhrough the Secretary, Health Department, D. K. S. Buflding Raipz.ir, District- Raipur, (C.G.). 2. The Director, Directorate of Ayurved, Yog and Prakratik Childtsa , Unani Siddh Evam Homeopathy (Ayush) Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). wmr pBTFnow U/A 226 OFTBE cowsmTunoN OF TSmA 1. Particulars ofthe petitioner: As stated in the cause tide. 2. Particulars offhe Respondents: -As stated in fhe cause title. § :f^i?;3S^ ^ f,F! ,^^ ww^, "^&ly<-y HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Djwaker) PET!TIQNER Writ Petitipn f51 No. 6618 of 2010 Dr. Pramendra Kumar a»i|i RESPONDENTS VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh and another Smt. Indira Trjpathi, counsei for the petitioner. Shri A. V. Sridhar, P.L. for the respondents. ER ARTICLE 226 OF TME lONQFXNDXA The grievance of the peHtloner is that though hls name has been included in the iist of surplus contract Ayurvedic Medicat Officer vide annexure P-2 dated 07.08.2010 but he has not been appointed for the sald post. According to the petltioner, for the first time on 18.02.2003 he was appointedas Ayurvedic Medical Oficer on contract basis and continued on the said post tll 21.07.2010. Further case of the petitioner is that in the year 2008 regular appointment through Public Service Commlssion for the post of Ayurvedic Medical Officer was made and thereafter annexure P-2 was issued on 07.08.2010 t.e. list of surptus contract Ayurvedic Medical Officer. According to the petitioner, consent was obtained by the State Government for posting hlm outslde the distrlct on contract basis and though he has given his consent, he has not been appointed on contract basis despite he is at sertai No.l in the sald ilst dated 07.08.2010. 2. In the return fiied by the respondents it has been put forth that the petitioner had obtained his first appointment by showing himself to be a Scheduled Tribe candidate whereas a complaint (Annexure R-4) has been made against him by one Chandra Kumar Slnha statlng therein that the petitioner does not belong to lou ui payiisnr sje siuapuodsaj sqi 'sindsip jspun si ](|3sij aisea siy sauo pue aiepipuea aquj. peinpsqDS e Duiaq aDUsijsdxs pue snieissiii ||e p8j|nb3e pue lusiuiuiodde siy psjnsss jsuoiiiisd aqi i84i iuajedde si i.i 'snqi •eiepipuea squi psinpsqss jo^ A|UO pBAjasaj SBM jnde^is ;o }sod pies 345 ^eqiT-'a sjnxsuue uuoj^ luspiAa si li pue (i-d ajnxsuue) £OQZ JesA sqi ui jndeiis ie iusiu^uiodde (eaiui 314 ^o enyiA Aq z-d sjnxsuue ap|A J83!^o lesjpaw 3|p9AjnAv pejiuoa sn|djns ^o }S|| aqi ui T'ON ieuas ie pS3B|d SBM J3UO!l!}3d 3qi ^O auieu 341 ieqi |esAaj siusujnsop aqi •31SB3 S|4 ;0 UOIieUIUUSlSp JO^ SSU|tUUJ03 siji sjopq Buipusd SJB sBuipassojd aifl y3jqM 01 luensjnd pue t?-y sjnxsuue spiA qiiesq ^o iusLuijedsp 'Ajeiaj38s syi sjo^sq iuie|diuo3 B paiy seq equis jeujn^ ejpue43 suo leyi jsuoiinsd 341 Aq psindsip iou si u •fr •pjossj uo 8|qe|!5Ae leysieuj siji pssnjsd pue ssiued sui jo^ |ssuno3 pjesi-i '£ •jnoAB^ si4 ui jspjo aqi psuieiqo pue BBUIUJUJOO sqi ejo^aq jaueuj siq psnsjnd SABU pinoys jauouRBd sqi MOU Aq leyi s^iuuqns jsqunj. |asuno3 sieis "AaueoeA ^o XiiieniusAS 341 u| tueuquiodde lusnbssqns Aue jo^ Me| qiiM 93uepjo33e ui psjspisuos eq pinoM ese3 sii| 'ssuiuuujo^ SL|I sjo^sq spssMns jsuoiuied 9i<3 ji pue esniujiuos 941 sjo^eq AuiinjDS jspun si aie3uiiJ33 aqi ^o ssBuauinusB sq^ lei^} siiiuqns SH •Aiyoyine luaisdiuoo sqi Aq psnssi SIEOUIVSD aises pijGA ou sey jsuomisd eyi pue uoneDnps }0 ssodjnd paiii.uii jo; psnssi SBM 3ie3ynJ33 siseo pies syi iey} suiuqns pue jopsjjoo 341 ^o soiyo sqi Aq psnssi sieayiijss s}SB3 e si qsiijM £->} sjnxsuuv 01 uno3 siyi ^o UOBUSUB UMBJP seq issunoo SIBIS 341 "siseq pejiuoa uo psiuiodde sq iouue3 jsuoiijisd 345 'sawiujiuo^ BUI Aq psppep IQU si jsuoiiii.sd sqi ^o sses sqi se BUO| se iei|i si siuspuodsej aqi ^o pue^s j8L|}jnj •SSUIUULUOS sqi 01 psuiixiqns uasq SAey siusiunDop iueAS|aj sqi ||e pue s-'a sjnxsuue 9P!A OTOZ'80'SO UO luaiUUJSAOS SiBlS 341 UJOJ; SlUSLUnQOp UIEV93 Jo^ ps^se peii Bauiuju.ios 31)1 pue (,,3auitULU03 syi^ uoys jo^) seniuiuio^ Auiinjos sises jsMOd MB'H I^A8^ sieis 341 sjojsq BUJpUBd ApB8J|e Sl 31SS3 Sil< ^o psdssj ui JSUOBBSd aqi ^o sses aqi leqi si IUSUIUJSAOS aieis SMI io pueis jsuvnj 'squjL ps|np343S ^:!ifc appotnting the petitloner on contract basls. Moreover, the petitioner has no right whatsoever to seek contrad appointment. From the record It appears that the dlspute of the caste of the petitloner 1s pending before the Committee since last more than one year and till date the petitloner has not made any effort to get his matter decided on an early date. Thus, the best course for the petitloner is to pursue his case and submit all the relevant documents before the said commlttee and to get the order in his favour. 5. in the result, the petition being devoid of any merit is tlable to be dismissed and itis dlsmlssed aecordlngly. •"^g;. <^- SA';^^( "-^' lll r'.)