IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 10026 of 2004 Between: Pallavi Bar & Restaurant, H.No. 1-9-1122/10/1/36, V.S.T. Road, Vidyanagar, Hyderabad, rep. by Managing Partner M.Madhusudan Reddy, S/o Vyma Reddy, aged 43 years. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner of Police , (East Zone), Hyderabad. 3 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Kachiguda Division, Hyderabad. 4 The Station House Officer, Nallakunta Police Station, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings in No. L&O/A3/783/2002 dated 5-6-2004 of the first respondent as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and grant such other necessary relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.RAGHAVA CHARYULU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner-Bar and Restaurant made an application to the first respondent for grant of amusement licence to conduct orchestra in the Bar and Restaurant for the period from 01.01.2004 to 31.12.2004. The same was rejected on the ground that a number of cases were booked against the petitioner concerned during the years 2003 and 2004 and that the partners were convicted in eight cases. When the first respondent issued impugned order on 05.06.2004 refusing to grant amusement licence, the petitioner approached this Court and filed the writ petition. The judgment of this Court in W.P.No.3165 of 2005 and batch has been relied on by the learned Government Pleader to continue the relief to the petitioner. Be it noted, in the said batch of cases, in W.P.No.3184 of 2005 filed by the petitioner herein wherein the proceedings of the Commissioner of Police dated 08.02.2005 rejecting the permission for the year 2005 was challenged, this Court dismissed the writ petitions by order dated 18.03.2005. Following the same, this writ petition is also dismissed. No costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 07.07.2005 vs To 1 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner of Police , (East Zone), Hyderabad. 3 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Kachiguda Division, Hyderabad. 4 The Station House Officer, Nallakunta Police Station, Hyderabad. 5 Two CCs to the G.P for Home, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad(O.U.T). 6 2 CD copies