IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5640 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 25.09.2009 Baljit Singh .....Petitioner versus Baljinder Kaur .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Ritesh Pandey, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed by the petitioner-husband against the order dated 13.8.2009 passed by the learned District Judge, Kapurthala, granting interim maintenance of Rs.2000/- per month to the respondent wife and Rs.1500/- per month to the minor child born out of the wedlock. The learned District Judge, Kapurthala has also granted litigation expenses @ Rs.3000/- “per month in lump sum”. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any merit in this revision petition, so far as granting of interim maintenance to the respondent-wife and her minor child is concerned. As regards the litigation expenses @ Rs.3000/- `per month' in lump sum, it C.R. No.5640 of 2009 (O&M) 2 appears to be a case of typographical error. Normally the litigation charges are granted in lump sum and not per month. The petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the District Judge, Kapurthala, alongwith an application for correction, if any. With these observations, the revision petition is dismissed. 25-09-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE