IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.4048 of 2009 DATE:19.08.2010 Between: Manga Kumara Swamy …… Petitioner And: Manga Swarupa and another …..Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.4048 of 2009 ORDER : This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C is nothing but abuse of process of law, in the sense, though a second revision petition is prohibited under Section 397 Cr.P.C, the petitionr resorted to Section 482 Cr.P.C in order to question a revisional order passed by the V Additional Sessions Judge, Karimnagar in Crl.R.P.No.47 of 2008. 2) There is no dispute between the parties about relationship. There is no dispute that both the parties are living separately by the date of filing of the maintenance case before the Magistrate. The petitioner’s counsel contends that decree of divorce was granted between the parties. Even a divorced wife is entitled for maintenance from the divorced husband until she remained un- married. 3) Even though it is alleged that the 1st respondent is having landed property, no document is produced to show any property in her name. She is unable to maintain herself as she has no source of income. Though the petitioner alleges adultery, he did not prove the said fact by examining any witnesses. Only one witness i.e., himself was examined by the petitioner as R.W-1. The petitioner is admittedly working as General Mazdoor in Singareni Collieries Limited. The lower Courts rightly assessed his income at Rs.15,000/- per month as it is bare minimum for the Singareni employee. After all, the maintenance granted to the 1st respondent is Rs.2,000/- per month which works out at Rs.67/- per day which is ridiculously low. I do not find any ground to interfere with the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge. 4) Hence, the petition is dismissed. _______________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J August 19, 2010 KSH