IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2889 of 2008 Ram Sundar Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 5 25.11.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the State. It is submitted on behalf of the State that the provident fund dues for the period prior to 1976 for the writ petition was filed has been settled and sanctioned for payment and the necessary communication has been sent to the Treasury, and as such, the order of the Court has been complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that some amount of the provident fund even after November, 1976 has not been properly calculated and paid. Be that as it may, since the order of the Court with respect to the claim of the petitioner for the period prior to November, 1976 has been complied with, the contempt application need not proceed further. However, as submitted by the petitioner with respect to the lesser payment of the provident fund dues for the period after November, 1976, it will be open for the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the concerned District Provident Fund Officer for consideration. The MJC application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)