.w- tN THEHtGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CG) WRITPETITION No. ^4^0 /2006 ShyamRathi, Aged about 56 years, S/o of Late Shri Bal.Kunwar, Qfr jto: 234, Siianti Nagar, Rajnagar Colliery, Hasdeo Area. Dist. ARUppur {M P) Versus (1) Soutti Eastern Coaifietds Limited ,. Through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director Seepat Road, Bi(agpur(CG)-48500e Respondents \0 \s"1*' ^* ^^•."f'^',..' (2) ChiefGeneratManager, L- A^; .--' •'" souttl Eastem Coalfeldi •^ <?•" (3) Soutti Eastem Coalfelds Limlted Hasdeo Area. Dist. Manedragarh (M.P) The Sub Area Manger, South Eastem Coaffields Ltd, Rajnagar, HasdeoArea Dist. Manendragarh (M.P) •SBKBi ElfiBgSB BSSSSfiSS 'i^sSSS^S^S^'i ysssKw S^'SSS'K^iv^''K'"f^ ^^^[^ft;^^'i.;-" "ffi »a KwKV@M Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Const'rtution of tndia. SIS saM :a':'s»a»i XI-HC-22 SD^I^I , R^T3Tg?r %TIH?^ET —G— - ^: 3'5?-<i<<)ici<<, »<i1'y're,.I«lcli'H3< w^'^^^^l^ an^iTRiraT'gfeT S^-2QOS Mr. G. Mukhopadhyay, co^rise! for the peiitioner iVir. Pravin Das, Advocst respondents No.11" 3. Learned counsei for ths petition to learned counsel for re; frieard tearned counse! for| The case of the petitioner is djrected to take notice on behaif of {setjttoner has ssjppited extra copy ofths jpondents. jthe parties- is that he was bom atviiiage Murpuhka", ji'lterats person as he had not 4 ascointec1 as Underaround load^: iyvdr a' per the provisions of Mines'Acil recorded in Form 8 Regjster ai Q^Q of birth of ths petltlonsf statutory rsgisier. Tha oetrtjon, Shat the date of blith recorded iit 22 years ason 16.2.73. Respq Kuie / / ot ine Amenaed MI"e3 'wifepft'i Timsff'S'i^ret ^fSi^R ^ariigtTsii^r .' R.O. & viiiage Piparacii, DisSrict (porakhpur (UP) in the vear 1951. He js an tudisd in any schooi. The petitloner was in Rajnagar coiiiery on 25.8.1972 and as t; She date of Siitil of {fic petitioner v/as 21 'years as on 26.8.72 that is how the is 26,8.51. The Fo!'m B Register is a w Is a membe,1' of Coai Mines Provsdeni Fynd constituted uncier the Qoa! Mines ProvldOTt and MiseelSaneous Prov'sions Act. The CMPF accdunt number is A'14/54/27 P. It is submitted CMPF rscord nas ateo been recorded as idents authorities did not comply with the Tho, raregistsr rsquirsd by su!b-sifecsoR (1) ofSgc.48 shaii bs rrialntainsd Jr! jA-ct and Ruies, 1a80 which envisages fchat Forru-B^. k^eplnQ sepaf^t^ psg^ ^or ffach person smpi'oyecf in mi'ne/ Thc respondents haye wrongly recoijdsd the age of the pe-titioner in 1 -987 tn the servtoe exoerpt as.26 years ^son 26.6.1972, though CMPF records clearly shows that the ags or th^ petitloner was 22 years as on 16,2.73 as per Anriexure-P/4. The p^tltloner made a representation to ihe [^lfirt wx la «a ssas '^sw^. 'sS^S ;Sii!S 1 XI-HC-22 aiiHT^i r<-ii+ sii^i gp:ri??'gft?r 's ^ 'S^^WvR, 9-Awiic, fn tmRff •?teA •(fsreere iT3ri5OT3ii^r respondeni No.3 for cotrection dr his date of birth or refer ths mattar to ths Medjcal Board. Ths Detiiioner (vas undsr th®imprsssion that his date of. birth wouid be corrected as ^ssured. The petltioner aiso requested respondent No.3 to sehd him CQmmitSee, butthe same has RO3t &een done. Havmg heard iearnad c^unsei parties, 1 have perused Annexure- P/3 in .which the age of the p^titron.er was recorded as 2-2 years as on 16.2.73 whereas, i" the sepi/so petitioner was recorded as 28 A"nexure-P''-3. Learned counsei forihe the aoove sge was rscorcied. i cjrcumstances, respondent No ^ excsrpts (Annexurs-P/4) the ag©of the j/ears as on 2S.8.72 which is sontrai"y to ^etitloner subrriitted thai wiSftcut any basis |h6 petlttoner is an iliiterate person. in the 13 ought to hsve sent the petitioner for ags ofthe pstjiionsr by th®ags In view of Annexure-P/31 date of birth rscorded in the seri rssorted ;o ;he procsdure e| When ihere was no schoo! !ea< as per ciause C WHiCH Committee/'Medicai Board for management, in She case of s determined in accordancs with t} to the Medica! Board/Age Determ'nation examinaiion by ihe Msdicai Bo^rd forths purposs of detsrmination of ths letsrminationcommiSes. . Ind PM whsn there was discreoancy' in the [".ce record, the respondenis oughtto have rtvisaged In trte Nailona! Coal Wsge •^eth A-ft-il Agreement III impiamentation Ihstruction No.76 dated 25"' AoriS, 1988. ihg csrtiflcate, the.n proper course for ihs respondenfe v.'as to rsfer ihs m^itw to the Aga Dstermlnatson Commiites [iays down ShaS "Ags Oetermination the above wlil be constituteg by the ^npioyees v/hose a'ate of birth cannot be ie procedure mentjoned in B (i) (a) or S (i) (b) above, the date of birth r^corded in the records of th.e Company, [^^Rg4 BSSSSSBl sssis& if^^^i^^ ^^^^^sll 1^^^%S?SI 1^^^ ^ 's^^^ rsssa • II^M M ISr XI-HC-22 SIT^TqiT i?Ti?i3il^?i siTqWHftiT Barve ^ ^ • 1 ~3~^ '•^TRRR, "S^tWTS, f^IRty ^ sn^TTOnwnfet 4l'<ic!''i'-( tfp^ '31yzt Tf^Tt^re '^•SiPtPTSIi^i nameiy, Form B register, CMPF r^cords and 'dentify Cards wiil bs irsated as fina!. Providsd that whsre ths records mentioned above, the Determination CQmmittee/Medical for determination of ase." Slncs there is variatiQn Sn the ags reCQrdsd in tiia records CMPF (Annexure-P/; therefore, proper course for the r I) and sen/ice excerpts (Annexure-P/4), ^spondents was to adopt the procedure matter of the petitioner before th Board. pe"od of one wssk from fche da^ s is a variaifon in the age .'•scora' in ths matter wiii be refen-ed to ihs Age Board con5tituted by the management as osr ciause C of ths imDismdntation instruction No.76 and refer the ; Aae DotcrritiHation ConTirTiitte^/Mwdicat It Is statsd that as per rssjjiondents' records ihe petstioner Is going to retire on 30'" June 2006, theref(sre, respondsnts sre ciirectsci to refer tne matter of the petitioner to the Ag®Detsrmination Committee withjn a of rscs'pt of copy of this orc<9r artd ihs Ags DeisrminaiioR CoTntniitee toldscids ihe age ofths pstitionsr bsfore h® aitalns the age of superar|nuatlon i.e. last day of June, 2006. Respondents to act upon the Commlttse. The deciston taten Aae Determination Commlttee i?n?rt^diate!^. Ths wnt petSSIon is disposs^i of accordingiy. Consequentiy, Fvl.{W.)P. aiso siand disposed of. Psrtles are entitSed for csrti leport given by the Age Determination fcy respondents based on the report ef be communicated to the petitioner No,1818/2Q06 and !.A. No.4798/2006 ied copy ofthis oraer. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge. »4> '^^gs^s^s IBSBBBI i-aiB: ^^^^^-^^^ saa SM •is^s sa sisa