1 lpa205.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 205 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3836 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6774 OF 2011 _________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | orders or | Court's or Judge's Orders directions and | Registrar's orders | _________________________________________________________________________________ Shri R.N. Dhorde holding for Shri P.S. Dighe, Advocate for appellant. Shri K.K. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent no.3 Shri S.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent no.4. ..... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. Date : 7th July, 2011. . The Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred against the order dated 1st June, 2011 passed by the learned Single Judge during the Vacation. The grievance of the appellant is that certain observations have been made in that order, which leave no room for the appellant to argue his Writ Petition. 2. Considering the observations made in the order, 2 lpa205.11 we find that those are clearly prima facie and made only while considering whether to grant ad-interim relief. Notice before admission has been issued, and therefore, the learned Single Judge would decide the issue as to whether the Petition should be admitted, on its own merits, without being influenced by the order passed on 1st June, 2011. 3. The Letters Patent Appeal is disposed of. 4. In view of the disposal of the Letters Patent Appeal itself, the Civil Application is also disposed of. ( M. T. JOSHI, J. ) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J) ga s/lpa205.11