1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.5886/2002. : : Ramesh Chand Vs. Labour Court, Bharatpur & Anr. : : Date of Order 16.12.2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Ms.Sanjana Shresth for Mr.C.L.Saini for the petitioner. Mr.Hemant Kumar Sharma for Mr.Paresh Choudhary. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition has been filed against the order dated 22.5.2001 whereby application of the petitioner filed under Section 33 C (2) of Industrial Disputes Act for payment of his wages from 1.6.1994 till 17.12.1994 was rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the petitioner actually worked and this fact is evident from the muster-roll and the recommendation made by the Chairman of Municipal Board, Deeg for extension of his service. Learned Labour Court rejected the application on whatever evidence was produced before it. In the evidence produced before the learned Labour Court, an application written by the petitioner himself was produced, which indicated that 2 petitioner admitted that he worked only to the date of 31.5.1994. If no evidence was produced before the Labour Court that the petitioner actually worked beyond that date, the order of Labour Court cannot be faulted on evidence produced. The petitioner if he feels aggrieved by action of respondents, he could raise industrial dispute on this question. However determination of this question in the scope of Section 33 C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, cannot be made. I do not find any merit in this writ petition, the writ petition is dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/- Item No.35.