IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 9030 of 2008 Between: Smt. Syed Khaja Bee W/o. Sd. Mastan, R/o. Ravuruvari Kandirga (donka), Indukurpet Mandal, Nellore District. ..... PET IT IONER AND 1 The District Collector, Nellore, Nellore District. 2 The Project Director, District Women and Child Development Agency, Anganwadi Karyakalapa Niyamaka Director, Nellore, Nellloer District. .....RESPONDENT (S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not finalise the selection of the process of the Anganwadi workers pursuant ot the notiﬁcation in the year 2005 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law, un-constitutional, besides being illegal, and violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the fresh notiﬁcation as illegal without jurisdiction by holding that the petitioner eligible and entitled to be appointed as Anganwadi Worker in pursuance of the selection made in the year 2006 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.MADHUSUDHANA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR WOMEN DEV. & CHILD WELFARE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.9030 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled seeking a Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not ﬁnalizing the selection process of Anganwadi workers pursuant to notification issued in the year 2005 as arbitrary and illegal. There is no necessity of going into all the details. The learned counsel for petitioner states that during t he pendency of the writ petition, the respondents have already considered the case of petitioner and appointed her as Anganwadi worker, therefore nothing survives in the writ petition for further adjudication. In view of the same, the writ petition is closed. No order as to costs. ____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 4.9.2008 DA THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.9030 of 2008 4.9.2008