IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No. 2039 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 13.09.2010 Jagdish and another ....Petitioners versus R.C. Sharma and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Nemo for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Malik, A.A.G., Haryana. for the respondent-State. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) Petitioners have filed the present revision against R.C. Sharma- respondent No. 1, who had already died and Tarun Sharma-respondent No.2 against the impugned judgment of acquittal. Vide order dated 07.05.2010, the petitioners were directed to furnish the correct address of respondent No.2 and case was adjourned to 22.07.2010. On that day, the position remained the same and notice to respondent No.2 could not be issued for want of correct address. One more opportunity was granted to the petitioners for furnishing the correct address and case was adjourned for today. Today neither anybody is appearing on behalf of the petitioners nor petitioners have complied with the previous orders. Therefore, I have no option to dismissed the petition. Consequently, the petition is dismissed as such. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) Judge September 13, 2010 naresh.k