THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 2722 OF 2011 Dated: 05.12.2011 Between : Saleemuddin … Petitioner And Smt. Basheerunissa Begum and 9 others … Respondents The Court made the following:- THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2722 OF 2011 O R D E R: This revision petition is directed against the order dated 10.06.2011 in I.A.No.464 of 2010 in O.S.No.888 of 2007 on the file of the Court of III-Addl. District Judge (FTC), Rangareddy. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff, who filed the suit for declaration that the development agreement-cum-General Power of Attorney bearing document No.1566 of 2006, dated 23.02.2006 executed by defendant Nos.1 and 2 and executant No.3 therein in favour of defendant Nos.8 and 9 is illegal and unlawful. While the suit is coming up for plaintiff’s evidence, I.A.No.464 of 2010 has been filed under Order 6 Rule 17 of C.P.C. for amendment of plaint. The said application was dismissed by the Court below on the ground that no justifiable reason was shown for seeking amendment three years after filing the suit that too, when the case was posted for trial on payment of costs. The said order is challenged in this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material available on record. It is true that the trial is yet to be commenced and it is coming up for the chief examination of the witness on behalf of the plaintiff. However, the amendment of pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 of C.P.C. can be permitted only where the Court is of the opinion that such amendment is necessary for the purpose of determining the real questions in controversy between the parties. As could be seen from the affidavit and petition in I.A.No.464 of 2010, the proposed amendment does not appear to be necessary for the purpose of determining the real questions in controversy between the parties. Hence the Court below cannot be said to have committed any error in declining to allow the amendment of the plaint. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition, which is devoid of any merit, is hereby dismissed. No costs. ___________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 05.12.2011 Ivd