( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 15 OF 2010 Shri Milind Anand Bachhav .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and anr. .. Respondents Shri Mukul Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri B.V. Wagh, A.P.P. for respondent No.1. Shri N.B. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM : P.R. BORKAR,J. DATED : 20.01.2010 P.C. :- 1. Heard Adv. Shri M.K. Kulkarni for the petitioner, A.P.P. Shri B.V. Wagh for respondent No.1 and Adv. Shri N.B. Suryawanshi for respondent No.2. 2. This is a writ petition filed against the interim order passed by the 4th Jt. Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Dhule on application Exh.37 in S.T.C.C. No. 4619 of 2006 on 29.06.2009, whereby the application calling upon the ( 2 ) complainant to furnish receipt book was turned down by the learned Magistrate. The case of respondent No.2/complainant is that from him the petitioner has taken cement and steel on credit and amount of Rs. 4,15,517/- was due. Towards that amount, a cheque of Rs. 1,50,000/- was issued and it was dishonoured. The learned advocate for respondent No.2 stated that the evidence is already on record and the application is filed only for protraction of the trial. 3. In my opinion, in extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India cannot be invoked in such cases. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. However, the petitioner will have right to raise this point in appeal, if such occasion arises. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2010/JAN10/crwp15.10