1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION F. NO.2375/2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.337/2011 Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Through its Regional Manager, Amravati ...Versus... Sushilabai wd/o Vijaykumar Agrawal and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. [Shri D.S. Agnihotri, Adv. for appellant] [Ms Tapdiya, Adv. for respdt. no.1/applicant] [Smt. R.A. Deshpande, AGP for resdpt. nos.2 & 3] CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 26.09.2011. Heard. Learned Counsel for the appellant states that true it is that compromise has been made in relation to the quantum of compensation in some other cases but then the appellant has deducted the amount allowed by the Land Acquisition Officer in all cases and that formula is adopted in the instant case and that amount comes to Rs.10,00,000/- i.e. Rs.8,00,000/- and odd and therefore, respondent no.1/applicant cannot be allowed to withdraw either Rs.17,47,927/- or Rs.10,00,000/-, as prayed for in this application. Having considered the facts that the appellant itself has compromised with some 2 claimants in respect of award of enhancement of compensation and figure arrived at by the appellant/Corporation is Rs.8,00,000/- and in view of the fact that respondent no.1/claimant is ready to furnish solvent security, in my opinion, an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- should be allowed to be withdrawn though the prayer for withdrawal of the entire amount cannot be granted. Hence, I make the following order. O R D E R (i) Civil Application is partly allowed. (ii) Respondent no.1/claimant is allowed to withdraw an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lac Only). (iii) Respondent no.1/claimant shall furnish solvent security to the extent of only Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lac Only) in view of the above admitted facts. Civil Application stands disposed of. JUDGE ssw