^.T . f^(o^ ^ ^/^ \^'/y/ ..••'^ ^A^/. ^/y/y <^y^v -<i?^" _<-..' -c->v .; ft'?"1 '^' /' ^ 1. Smt. Salomi Tirkey, W/o Praful! Tirkey, aged about 42 years, working as Head Master Primaiy School, Tamba-kachhar, Block- Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 2." Patrash Ekka, S/o Late Shri Balam Sai Ekka ,Aged about 42 Years, Working as Head Master Primary School, Bandotoli, Block-Bagicha, Distt- Jashpur(C.G.) 3 Hilarius Kerketta S/o Anastus Kerketta, Aged about 42 Years, Working as Head Master Girls Primary School Bimda, Block- Bagicha,Distt-Jashpur(C.G.j. ^•' 4 Smt. Magret Kujur W/o Leous Kujur, Aged about 4-0 Years, Working as Head Master Primari' School Turrikona, Block- Bagicha, Distt-Jashpur (C.G.). iw^^'^^?E3^^^^^^^^^^s^^@'^ \. 5. Sn-it. Susma Ekka W/o Rajesh Ekka, Aged about 39 Years, Working as Head Master Priinary School Khantadand, Block- Bagicha, Distt-Jashpur (C.G.). 6 Smt. Susanna Dungdung W/o Patras Ekka, Aged about 40 Years, Working as Head Master Primary School Rapatkona, Block-Bagicha, Distt-Jashpur (C.G.). 7 Smt. Rajkuniari Xaxlo W/o Thomas Xajdo, Aged about 41 Years, Working as Head Master Prisaary School Patrapars, Block-Bagicha, Distt-Jashpur (C.G.). i3 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, Triba! Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Coinmissioner, Tribal Welfare Department Jashpur, Distt.- Jashpur (C.G.} Block Education Officer, Block - Bagicha Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) ^ !--7T— \0 Treasury Officer, Treasuiy Account 8s Pension Jashpur, Distt.-Jashpur (C. n -<<A f'1 y / A -^^MS: t# 9 PETITSONERS RESPONDENTS H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 1768 OF 2011 Smt. Satomi Tirkey & Others State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of tndia) Singte Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the Stats. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on thls 01 day ofApril, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearlng for the petitioners submte that the petitioners are entitied to benefit of two advance increments on account of the fact that they have passed B.T.I. examination in the year 1990, 1991, 1992, 1991, 1992, 1991 & 1992 respectivety before their appointment i.e. on 30.06.1993, at their own cost. !t is submitted that the issue involvsd In the present petition Is no longer res sntegra, as the same has been finalSy decided by the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena v. StateofM.P. &0rs\ 3. !t Is further submitted that this Court has also taken a similar view in its order dated 6-2-2009 passed in W.P. (S) No.6257 of 2008. Learned counse! further submits that the order dated 29-4-2010 passed in W.A.No.124of2009,wherein relying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena (supra) and the ordsr passed by thjs Court in another W.A.No.87 of 2009, directions have been issued for consideration of the case for grant of two advance increments as per the ; cireuiar dated 21-9-1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verificatlon of the facts pieaded in the pefition. 2009 (III^MPJR (SC) 59 ar;i ii ^\s 4. Lsarned counsei appearing for the State submits that the case of the petitioners would aiso be considered on the same lines. 5. !n view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to decide the claim of the petittoners for grarrt of two advance increments, as per the ciroular dated 21-9-1974, issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after verification of the facts pleaded in the petition within a period of 8 weeks from today. '^t^ satts 'iuds6 ij'ir