IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 8181 of 2008. Decided on: 03.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Surinder Singh. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. None for respondent No.4. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that since the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed in view of reply filed by respondents No.1 to 3, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 03, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?