1appln-4922-09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION No. 4922 of 2009 Mahadeo Suresh Mane @ Tamya .. Applicant. vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr B.S. Phad, for the Applicant. Mr Y. M. Nakhawa, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM:- A.R. JOSHI, J. DATE :- 12TH JULY, 2010. P.C.:- 1. Heard rival submissions for some time on this application for regular bail preferred by the applicant arrested in connection with C.R. No.66/2009 registered by Railway Police Station, Pune for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201, read with section 34 of I.P.Code. 2. Admittedly, two other co-accused are bailed out by the Sessions Court. However, application for present applicant was rejected mainly on the ground that there is a statement of one witness who happened to over heard the words uttered by the present applicant when she was talking to the deceased on telephone. During the said talks, the deceased had allegedly informed the said witness that the person whom she over heard, was his friend by name Tamya i.e. 2appln-4922-09 the present applicant and that time he was holding a chopper and saying that it was the last date of the deceased. Apart from such statement of the witness, there are recoveries at the instance of the present applicant by way of blood stained clothes and blooed stained broken glass bottle and one irregular shaped stone. 3. Reportedly, the investigation is already over and charge is already framed against the present applicant along with two co-accused in June, 2010 and in the near proximity trial can be commenced. Under these circumstances, it would not be proper in the fitness of situation to allow the present application Hence, the order. ORDER: (a) Bail Application No. 4922/2009 is hereby rejected. (b) Learned Additional Sessions Judge, who is seized of the matter, shall dispose of the pending Sessions Case, as early as possible, according to law, within a period of nine months from the date of receipt of writ of this order, without being influenced by the observations made in the present order so far as merits of the case are concerned. Application is disposed of. (A.R.JOSHI,J)