IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20015 of 2007 SMT.SUSHILA DEVI & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 6 12.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned APP for the State. Cognizance has been taken against the petitioners vide order dated 15.2.2007 in Complaint Case No. 3632 (C ) of 2006 under sections 385, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Bereft of the other details in the complaint which came to be filed learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are case and counter case between the parties for certain disputes relating to business and otherwise. But over a period of time by intervention of well wishers they have decided to resolve the issue amicably and in support of the same, by way of a supplementary affidavit a compromise petition filed before the court below has been brought on record, which bears the signatures of all the parties to the dispute. It is urged that in view of above no purpose will be served by allowing the prosecution of the petitioners. Learned counsel representing the opposite party no.2 also certifies the position and states that better sense finally seems to have prevailed. In view of the above stated position along with the material on record the order taking cognizance dated 15.2.2007 - 2 - passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna in Complaint Case No. 3632 (C ) of 2006 is hereby quashed. The application is accordingly allowed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)