1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5025 OF 2010 Ajaydeep Power Corporation, Aurangabad through its Field Officer Prakash s/o Rambhau Dhurpate ..Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents Mr.S.A.Nagarsoge, Advocate holding for Mr.P.D.Suryawanshi, Advocate for petitioner Mr.S.K.Kadam, A.G.P. for respondent No.1 Mr.S.M.Godsay, Advocate for respondents 2 to 7 CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND N.D.DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 5th August 2010 PER COURT : 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by which the petitioner challenges the issuance of a fresh tender notice dated 4.6.2010. 2. According to the petitioner, pursuant to the tender notice published in the daily “Lokmat”, on 18.3.2010, the petitioner who is a Corporation registered under the provisions of the Bombay Shop and Establishment Act, 1948, submitted the tender. According to the petitioner despite the submission of the tender the petitioner was not informed as to whether the tender of the petitioner had been accepted. The petitioner was taken 2 aback on seeing the fresh tender notice being published by the respondents on 4.6.2010. However, pursuant to the said tender notice the petitioner had submitted his tender. 3. It is obvious that the earlier tender process has been cancelled by the respondents and, therefore, a fresh tender notice has been issued. Since the petitioner has already submitted a tender in response to the second tender notice, according to us no case for interference is made out and, therefore, the petition is summarily dismissed with no orders as to costs. ( N.D.DESHPANDE, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) (vvr/5025.10wp)