IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.33073 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 28, 2011 Atma Ram & another ...Petitioners Versus Satpal & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Paramjit Singh Jammu, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The allegations against the petitioners as well as the Tehsildar are for filing a false affidavit, which is even back dated. As per the finding, this was done in collusion with accused No.4 Vijender Bhardwaj, Tehsildar, who was not on duty, but shown the presence of the petitioners through this affidavit, which was taken to mark their presence. On that date, some Naib Tehsildar was on duty. It is on this basis, the Tehsildar has been summoned under Section 167 IPC. There is sufficient material to summon the petitioners as accused. As such, I do not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order. Dismissed. November 28, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE