IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 24020 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: November 1, 2010. Deen Mohd. @Deenu ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh, A.A.G., Haryana Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the complainant. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No. 150 dated 22.04.2010, under Sections 148/149/323/302/506 IPC and Section25 of Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Sadar Palwal. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. CRM No.M-24020 of 2010 It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been continuing in custody since 10.02.2010. Further contends that only injury attributed to him is with Lathi blow on the hand of Yakub and that however, as per MLR no injury has been found on the hand of Yakub. Bail application has been opposed by learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for the complainant on the plea that admittedly he was present at the place of occurrence as he also received injury. Further contends that he was armed and actually participated in the occurrence. As per MLR Yakub received injuries including injuiry on the forearm and hence, it cannot be said that he has not received injury on the hand. Further contended that there are 22 accused in this case and only 8 are arrested so far and others are absconding. Petitioner actually participated in the occurrence. Though he has caused injuries to a witness however, he has been charged for offence under Section 302 IPC with the aid of Section 149 IPC. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing anything on the merit of the case, I am of the view that it is not such a case in which concession of bail should be granted to the accused. There is no merit in the instant application for bail filed by Deen Mohd @Deenu. The same is, hereby, dismissed. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) November 1, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2