WP(C) 664/2011 BEFORE HON\BLE MR JUSTICE B D AGARWAL This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the decision of shifting the EGC Centre from Singirbond to Nalarpar. Heard Mr. MU Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. MK Misra, learned S tanding counsel accepts notice on behalf of Respndent nos. 1 and 2. Ms. K Devi, leanred counsel accepts notice on behalf of Respondent Nos. 4 and 7 and Mr. S Sh arma , learned counsel accepts notices on behalf of Respondent Nos. 3, 5 and 8. Mr. Mondal submitted that the government had initially sanctioned the EGC Center at Singirbond and after its upgradation to the level of L.P.School, the Govt. h as decided to construct the school at Nalarpar which should not be allowed. Mr. Mondal submits that vide order dated 29.01.2010 in WP (C) No.6109 of 2010, this Court directed the concerned authorities to take the final decision upon hearing the petitioners but the respondents have reiterated their decision and are goin g ahead to shift the school at Nalarpur without hearing the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid order of this Court, the Block Elementary Education Off icer-cum-Block Mission Co-ordinator made a spot inquiry and found that there are only five families at Singirbond who sends only two children in Singirbbond EG C Center whereas Nalarpur is having 40 families where from fifty children are at tending the ECG Center. In the opinion of the aforesaid authorities, Nalarpur is best situated for the EGS Center. Since the decision was taken by a competent authority on spot inquiry, it cannot be said that the petitioners were not heard. Besides this, the place where cons truction is undergoing is hardly 50 meters away from the existing center. This a part, 60% of the construction works have already been completed. Hence, I am not persuaded to interfere with the decision of the Respondents. In the result, the writ petition stands dismissed.