IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11698 of 2007 REENA KUMARI, wife of Shri Siyaram Jaiswal, resident of Mohalla- Nonia Patti, Navgachhia, District Bhagalpur…. Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Secretary to the Govt., Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Social Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Bhagalpur. 5. The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur. 6. Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Navgachhia, Bhagalpur. 7. The Child Development Programme Officer, Navgachhia, District Bhagalpur. 8. The Councellor of Ward No. 15, P. S. Navgachhia, District- Bhagalpur. 9. The Supervisor (Parvekchak) Shri Jai Shankar Prasad, P. S. Navgachhia, District Bhagalpur. 10. The Chairman, District Board, Bhagalpur. 11. Nibha Kumari, wife of Sanjay Saha, resident of village/ mohalla- Noniapatti (Mushari) Ward No,. 15, P. S.- Navgachhia, District Bhagalpur. … Respondents. ----------- 2. 17.12.2009. No one appears for the petitioner. Counsel for the State is present. This court would find that for the following prayer as made in this writ application:- “i) to direct the respondent no. 3 to cancel the Maping list which was prepared on 13.4.2007 specially by the respondent nos. 7, 8 and 9 for the appointment to the post of Anganbari Sevika of Ward No. 15, P. S. Navgachhia, District Bhagalpur. ii) to direct the respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6 first preference must be given to the petitioner because she has been selected for the appointment of Anganbari Sevika, Navgachhia on the ground of higher education and obtaining 2 higher marks from the respondent no. 11. iii) to direct the respondent authority to make appointment to the post of Anganbari Sevika at Navgachhia (Bhagalpur) as the petitioner is at serial no. 126 and respondent no. 11 is at bottom in the Maping List.” the petitioner has an alternative remedy of moving the Collector of the District who is the prescribed authority to look into any sort of anomaly in the selection/appointment on the post of Anganwari Sevika. In view of the fact that the petitioner has not moved the Collector of the District inasmuch as all the representations contained in Annexure- 3 to 5 filed by the petitioner are before the authorities who have no jurisdiction to decide such dispute, this court would only give liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh compact representation which, if filed, would be disposed of in terms of Government Guidelines and recent Government Circular dated 10.12.2009 but only after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, respondent no. 11 and concerned representative of Bhagalpur 3 Municipality. With the aforementioned observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)