IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35700 of 2010 SARITA DEVI @ SAVITA DEVI @ PAPLOO & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 16.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the State. Admittedly, the cognizance of the offence has been taken on the basis of complaint case and petitioner no.1 is married Nanad whereas petitioner no.2 is Nandosi of the complainant. Although there is some sort of allegation against these petitioners also but considering this aspect of the matter that the prosecution has been initiated on the basis of complaint case, I think it proper to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to petitioners. Accordingly, petitioners namely, (1) Sarita Devi @ Savita Devi @ Paploo and (2) Brajesh Rai, in the event of arrest/surrender within 30 days from the date of communication of this order to the concerned court in connection with Complaint Case No.632 of 2005, shall be released on bail on 2 furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. PN/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)