1 ABA-197.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.197 OF 2011 1. Mrs. Anjali @ Anjani Krishna Bhopi & 2. Pradeep Krishna Bhopi .... Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Shri Sanjeev P. Kadam for the Applicants. Ms P.P. Shinde, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: APRIL 06, 2011 P.C: 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by the mother in-law and brother in-law of the first informant who complained that they had joined her husband and father in-law in beating her up on 9-2-2011. On 10-2-2011 the first informant's husband is alleged to have administered her poison. She was then hospitalized and was discharged on the next day. Considering the nature of the allegations against the applicants, the applicants' being in custody for the purpose of investigation is not necessary, though the learned APP has some other view. In view of 2 ABA-197.11 this, in the event of the applicants' arrest in C.R. No.72 of 2011 of Panvel Town Police Station, District Raigad, the applicants be released on their furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs. 25,000/- per person on the condition that the applicants shall report at the police station concerned on 11-4-2011 at 10:00 a.m. for interrogation and thereafter as and when required by the I.O.. The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and they shall not leave the country without the prior permission of the trial Court. 2. This order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge-sheeted, the applicants may furnish fresh bond before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court, dated 2-12-2010, delivered in Criminal Appeal No.2271 of 2010, arising out of SLP (Cri.) No. 7615 of 2009 {Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.}. 3 ABA-197.11 3. The application accordingly stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)