IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 2824 of 1999 Between: M. Seetharama Reddy S/o. Late Ammi Reddy R/o. 46-17-30, Danavaipeta, Rajahmundry, E.G. District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintending Enginer (R&B), N.H. Circle, Visakhapatnam. 2 The Executive Engineer (R&B), N.H. Circle, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in stipulating the condition with regard to the blasting or Hard Rock and insisting the same to be in the R&B Department as illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory and direct them to issue tender schedule to the petitioner for the work notified in tender notice No.12/98-99 dt.5-1-1999. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. J.VENKATESWARA REDDY Counsel for Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri J.Venkateswara Reddy, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Placing the said submission on record, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. ____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 23rd June, 2005. Ak ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Superintending Engineer, Roads and Buildings, N.H. Circle, Visakhapatnam. 2. The Executive Engineer, Roads and Buildings, N.H. Circle, Visakhapatnam. 3. Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (O.U.T). 4. Two CD copies.