Ladda 1 wp-7481-09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7481 OF 2009. Rajendra Deoram Jadhav .. Petitioner. Versus Sau.Supriya Bhausaheb More .. Respondent. Mr R.N. Gite, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr Tushar Sonawane, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 23rd August, 2011. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. The writ petition pertains to recording of mutation entry. It is now a settled position of law that mutation entry does not create or extinguish rights of the party and the same is recorded only for fiscal purposes. The parties are always at liberty to approach the Civil Court to get their rights adjudicated. A reference can be made to the decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Balwant Singh & another v. Daulat Singh reported in 1997 (7) SCC 137. In the above circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order in writ jurisdiction of this Court under article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition is dismissed (RANJIT MORE, J.)