In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh RFA No. 1327 of 2009 (O&M) Rajinder Kumar Sharma ... Appellant vs State of Haryana .... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Anuj Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. This appeal has been filed by the landowner seeking further enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Brief facts of the case are that vide notification dated 16.3.1999, issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the State of Haryana acquired land situated in village Saketri, Hadbast No. 376, Tehsil and District Panchkula for development and utilisation as residential, commercial, institutional, recreational in Sectors 1, 2, 3, 5B and 6, Mansa Devi Complex, Panchkula. The Land Acquisition Collector assessed the market value at Rs. 9,00,000/- per acre for Chahi Abi-barani land; Rs. 4,70,000/- per acre for Banjar land and Rs. 2,30,000/- per acre for Gair Mumkin kind of land. The landowners/claimants feeling dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Collector, filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below determined the market value of the acquired land at Rs. 418/- per square yard. Learned counsel for the parties submitted that the issue involved in the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this court in RFA No. 3008 of 2008– Smt. Poonam vs State of Haryana and another decided on 25.2.2009, whereby the appeals arise out of the same acquisition have been remitted back for fresh consideration. For the reasons recorded in Smt. Poonam's case, the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms. Parties through their counsels are directed to appear before the learned District Judge, Panchkula on 5.8.2009 for further proceedings. The learned District Judge may either keep the reference with him or entrust the same to the Additional District Judge who is dealing with the cases remanded earlier. 28.5.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge