IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4792 of 2007 SHREE NATH PRASAD YADAV SON OF LATE PARMESHWAR PRASAD YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – MILKI, P.O. MAKHATAKIYA, P.S. Naugachia, DIST – BHAGALPUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, KHAGARIA. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KHAGARIA. 4. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, KHAGARIA. ----------- 03. 28.06.2010 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add The District Provident Fund Officer, Khagaria, as respondent no. 4. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the State submits that the grievance of the petitioner with regard to the retiral dues have been settled and paid. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that some amount of GPF has remained to be settled and paid as yet. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims with regard to the balance dues on 2 account of GPF, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 4. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)