1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.90 OF 2011 Sunil Harishchandra Yadav Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra and others Respondents Petitioner present in person. A.S.Gadkari, APP for State. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR AND P.D.KODE, JJ. DATE : 12th September 2011 PC : 1. Perused the report submitted by the Member Judge and Disciplinary Authority dated 30th August 2011. Citing Rule 27 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, the Disciplinary Authority is of the opinion that the disciplinary action cannot be proceeded against the delinquent officer as the incident took place more than four years back i.e. on 23rd June 2006. That means that no departmental action can be proceeded against the Registrar. We would like to know whether the Registrar of the City Civil Court, Mumbai has been named as accused in the complaint filed before the Court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate which is stated to be numbered as 3700170/PW/2011. Learned APP prays for time to take instructions in this behalf. Stand over to 21st September 2011. (P.D.KODE, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)