1 CRI.APP.NO.1987/2009. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1987 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLCIATION NO.4 OF 2008. Sachin s/o Premchand Lodha .. Applicant VERSUS Shivram s/o Waman Ubale ..Respondent. ...... Mr.S.K.Naikwade, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.V.P.Golewar, Advocate for the respondent. ...... CORAM: A.V.NIRGUDE, J. Dated: 6th July, 2009. COURT’S ORDER: 1. Heard. 2. The application is made for permission to withdraw the amount which the respondent deposited in the Court, pursuant to the Court's order dated 22nd April, 2009 in Criminal Application No.1172/2009. 3. The respondent was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, by both the Courts below. 2 CRI.APP.NO.1987/2009. 4. As per the direction of the Court, the respondent has deposited Rs.60,000/- (Rs.Sixty Thousand only) in the Court. But this amount can not be paid to the applicant, who is complainant in the criminal case, because the fate of the amount would depend on the outcome of the criminal revision. The present applicant is respondent No.1 in the Revision Application. In that proceeding, the present applicant would be able to justify the Judgment and orders passed by the lower courts. At this moment, the applicant's demand of the amount is rather premature. The amount can be protected by directing the Office to invest the said amount in the FDR. The application is rejected. 5. However, the Office is directed to invest the amount of Rs.60,000/-(Rs.Sixty Thousand only), deposited by the respondent Shivram s/o Waman Ubale, in any Nationalised Bank, initially for a period of three months and it shall be renewed from time to time for every three months, till further orders. (A.V.NIRGUDE,J.) lkp