IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.259 of 2008 RAMESH JHA @ GUDDU JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 27.11.2008. N.H./ Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned order. The impugned order is in respect of payment of interim maintenance to the opposite party no.2 and her two children. In the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order of ad interim maintenance. Accordingly, this application is rejected. However, the court below is directed to expedite the enquiry and conclude the same within three months of receipt of this order. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )