IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 3013 of 2008. Decided on: 21.07.2010. __________________________________________________________ Prithvi Raj Negi and another. … Petitioners. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners. : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the Respondents. : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondent No.1. None for respondents No.2 to 35. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners cannot be considered for any category in view of change in law. It is made clear that the case of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law if permissible as per 85th amendment in the Constitution of India and instructions issued thereunder. Accordingly, the petition stands closed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. July 21, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?