IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13262 of 2001 SIDH NATH SHARMA, S/O SHREE JAMUNA SHARMA, R/O VILLAGE-PRASUSAMPUR, PRARI, DISTRICT-JEHANABAD AT PRESENT ASSISTANT TEACHER IN BAN BHAT SANSKRIT HIGH SCHOOL, SAKRI, KURD, JEHANABAD. ………………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. SPECIAL DIRECTOR (SECONDARY EDUCATION), BIHAR, PATNA. 3. CHAIRMAN, SANSKRIT SIKSHA BOARD, PATNA. 4. SECRETAY, SANSKRIT SHIKSHA BOARD, PATNA. …………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 4 02.07.2009 This writ application has been filed by the petitioner for a direction to the respondents to pay his salary from December, 1995 till today treating him as having been appointed within the staffing pattern in the school in question. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s service was approved by State Government in 1991, and therefore, he was entitled for salary which was wrongly stopped by the Sanskrit Siksha Board with effect from December, 1995. He also submits that the petitioner has already filed a representation before the Chairman of the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, a copy whereof is annexed as Annexure-7. He further submits that in similar circumstances, this Court has allowed the other writ application which order was squarely applicable in the case of this petitioner also. In this context learned counsel for the petitioner refers to one order passed by this Court in the case of one Raj Mangal Roy Vs. State of Bihar and others and has also referred the Division Bench order of this Court reported in 1994 (2) PLJR 359. He submits that the petitioner may be 2 given liberty to appear before the Chairman and canvass his case in reference to the said orders of this Court and the Chairman may be directed to dispose of his claim by a speaking order preferably within a fixed time frame. Learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Sanskrit Shiksha Board have no objection to the said prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner. In the circumstance, this writ application is disposed of with a direction to the Chairman of the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate speaking order in accordance with law preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If so advised, the petitioner may file a fresh representation before the Chairman giving further details of his service and the reference of the said judgments of this Court and may also pray for personal hearing in the mater. The writ application is accordingly disposed of with above directions. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)