-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 1030 OF 2005 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 522 OF 2003 IN AWARD NO. 17 OF 2003. SBI Capital Market Ltd. ... Appellants. Versus Citibank N.A. ...Respondents Mr. Rohit Kapadia, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Venkatesh Dhond, Ms. Sneha Phene and Ms. Pratibha Mehta, instructed by Little & Company, for the appellants. Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Pravin K. Samdani, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Swapan Samdani and Mr. Girish Dave, instructed by M/s. Dave Girish & Company, for the respondents. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATE: JULY 08, 2009. P.C. At the time of hearing of this appeal, learned senior counsel appearing for the parties in the matter state that the parties have amicably settled their disputes. The learned senior counsel appearing for the parties further state that on the basis of the instructions received by them from their respective clients that they have drawn up the consent terms and have signed them. The consent terms signed by the Authorised signatories of the appellants and respondents and the learned counsel appearing for the appellants and the -2- respondents have been taken on record and marked “X” for identification. In view of the above, order in terms of the Consent terms. The award of the Arbitrator as well as the order of the learned single Judge are accordingly substituted by the consent terms. Parties to act on the basis of the consent terms. Appeal stands disposed of accordingly. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. R.M. SAVANT, J.