'; Stngte Bench JHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTJSGARhLAT BILASPUR (C.G) W.P.(SINO. M<?>^1- OF Ku.Bharti Bala about 27 years, ^€./' 4':,^^' "•••^w \ ^yy ^«??F';/"' «¥"-A'" ,-y BasterKanker(C.G.) 1. S ;.s. 3 ;«<c 7 , ..fSiSE- aJc HI6H COCR.T QF C-HHAmSSARH AT BILASPCR K~a. Bharti Baia Borker State ofC.G. &, Others iS/22? 01 SA SlT-ri D.N.PraiaTia.ti, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Siagb. Thalsur, Dy.A.Q. for tlie Stel Grievance of T.he petitioaer iu. the present petition is that o'n 17.8.06 she was appoiiiled as Shiksha Karmi, Grade-ll aad she continued on t&e ssid post till 23.5.08 but thereafter she was reuioved froin her post on tbe ground that she ha.s not aanexed proper e.xperie.nce certificate. Pursua.at to fhe order passed by this 031.1rt, the petitioner preferred. a statutory appeai before fhe Additioaal Conunissioaer challengnig the vaadity of her teiToio.atioD. oitler and the ssid appeal was allowed by the com.petent autliority on 5.08.2010. This onler was assajled by fts.e State Govemiaent betore the Secretaiy, Paachayat however, the order of the Additional CoimiussioTier was also m.aiTitained ID. a.ppea.1 vide order CLated 28.4.2011. According to the counsel for the petitioner though tne order iias been nassed io bis fcivour but 1.iU date she 1-ias not been alkiwed to joiu on the post ofShiks'ha KaT.mi Grade-il. Couiisel fbr fhe petitioner subiaits that the liinited prsyer of fae petitioner is. tb.at her pendi-n.g represeatations (Aiiaexure P/5) be decided ia a.ccordance with law. 't..i'4 t ---"-^ ^' ^ State counsel Iias ao objectioa iffhe pcndio.g i^presents.tioiis of fhe petitioner is decided in accoi'dance with law wittiin soras tmiefi'am.e. The prescnt petition is disposed of with a dii'ecti.op. to tlie respondent No.2 to decide the pending representatioiis of tlie petitioTier aad to pass a.ppropriate order as e.xpeditiously as possible. Sd/- Pritiisker Diwaker, Judge