1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.22 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.582 OF 2005 Shaikh Dildar s/o Shaikh Sardar and two others Vs. Sk.Subhan Sk. Babbu Shaudagar ........................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................... Shri Kirti Satpure, Counsel for the Petitioners. Shri U.M.Aurangabadkar, Counsel for the Respondent. CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 23. JUNE, 2011. Shri U.M.Aurangabadkar, the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the respondent is present in person before this Court and upon taking instructions from him makes a statement, that the construction, which is made and shown in the Photographs (page-11), shall be removed, within a period of two weeks .....2/- 2 from today. In view of this, there is no reason to proceed further with this contempt petition. The proceedings are dropped by recording an undertaking given by the respondent before this Court. JUDGE BrWankhede ...../-