IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 299 of 2005 S.K. Raturi …………..Petitioner. Versus State of Uttaranchal and another. …Respondents. Mr. B.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Bindesh Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J, (Oral) 1. In the Motion Bench Order passed by this Court on 9.3.2010, it was conceded by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he would not press the instant Writ Petition for any claim other than for petrol charges, T.A. dues and newspaper payment as mentioned in Paragraphs 9 to 11 of the Writ Petition. Accordingly, a direction was issued requiring the respondents to re- determine the claim of the petitioner in respect of the aforesaid dues. 2. Since no decision was taken within the time stipulated, two weeks’ further time was allowed to the Chairman of the State Public Services Tribunal, Uttarakhand to take a final decision on the matter, as is apparent from the Motion Bench Order dated 28.04.2010. Learned counsel for the respondents has informed this Court that the aforestated decision has been taken by the Chairman of the State Public Services Tribunal, Uttarakhand on 10.5.2010. And after that, the aforesaid decision has been communicated to the petitioner. 3. In view of the above, we are satisfied that the instant Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous. The petitioner, if he be so advised, may assail the order dated 2 10.5.2010 passed by the Chairman of the Public Services Tribunal, Uttarakhand before a Court of competent jurisdiction, in accordance with law. 4. The instant Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 19.5.2010 Rathour