IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.6345 of 2009 Between: Integrated Tribal Development Society Regd. No. 184/98 Rep. by its Director G. Anil Kumar S/o. Ranga Rao Polavaram, W.G. District. ... PETITIONER AND 1) The District Collector, West Godavari District, Eluru 2) The District Level Scrutiny Committee by Chairman Cum Joint Collector, Eluru, W.G. District. 3) The Revenue Divisional Officer, Jangareddigudem , West Godavari District. 4) The Tahsildar, Polavaram,. West Godavari District. 5) Boragam Srinivasa Rao S/o. Kambampati Venkata Rao (Pitcharao) West Godavari District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 1 to 4 not disposing of the representation dt. 8-3- 2009 with regard to genuineness of the caste certificate of the 5th Respondent by conducting an enquiry as he misrepresent to file a nomination to M.L.A. Under S.T. reserved seat to the Polavaram CDonstituency to the coming elections, is illegal, arbitrary, and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently directing the respondents 1 to 4 disposing of the representation dt. 8-3-2009 with regards to genuineness of the caste certificate of the 5th Respondent by conducting an enquiry as he misrepresent to file a nomination to M.L.A.Under S.T. Reserved seat to the Polavaram Constituency to the coming elections and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.NARAM.NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel for Respondent No.5: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: Oral Order: (Per Shri Anil R. Dave, Chief Justice) 1. Learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. to 4 has submitted that the representation dated 08.3.2009 of the petitioner was received by respondent No.1 on 15.3.2009. It has been submitted by him that needful shall be done in pursuance of the representation in accordance with law and appropriate decision shall be taken as soon as possible and preferably within six months from today. 2. In view of the above statement, the petition stands disposed of. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ March 26, 2009 R. SUBHASH REDDY, J Note: Issue C.C. in two days. (By order) svs ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}