1 Criminal Rev.Application No.116 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.116 OF 2010 1. Yeshwant S/o.Narayan Pisal, Age-60 years, Occu-Agriculturist, R/o.Kawalgaon, Tq.Purna, Dist.Parbhani, 2. Rohiji S/o.Piraji Wagh More (Waghmare) Age-50 years, Occu-Agriculturist, R/o.Kawalgaon, Tq.Purna, Dist.Parbhani, 3. Vyankoji S/o.Gyanoji Pisal, Age-70 years, Occu-Agriculturist R/o.Kawalgaon, Tq.Purna, Dist.Parbhani APPLICANTS VERSUS 1. State of Maharashtra, Through Police Station Basmatnagar, Dist.Hingoli, 2. Narayan S/o.Govindrao Pisal, Age-70 years, Occu-Agriculturist, R/o.Kawalgaon, Tq.Purna, Dist.Parbhani RESPONDENTS Mr.V.M.Maney, learned counsel for the applicants. Mr.S.G.Nandedkar, learned A.P.P. for respondent State Mr.A.A.Munde, learned counsel for respondent no.2 (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 22/09/2011 2 Criminal Rev.Application No.116 of 2010 ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties. 2. This revision is directed against the order passed below Exh.1 in Criminal M.A.No.3/2010 vide order dated 19/03/2010 passed by the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Basmatnagar, refusing to condone the delay of 35 days in preferring criminal appeal. 3. After hearing the parties, an order was passed on 23/06/2011 in this application. Clause ‘4’ of the said order reads as, “Delay of 35 days in preferring the appeal is condoned. The applicants herein to pay an amount of Rs.3,000/- payable by the applicants to the respondent no.2. Costs to be paid within 30 days from today.” It is informed across the bar by learned counsel for the revision applicants that the costs are paid and learned counsel for respondent no.2, who is present in the Court also admit that he has received the amount of costs. 3 Criminal Rev.Application No.116 of 2010 4. In view of this, now the directions given in the order dated 23/06/2011 are complied with. In the result, criminal revision application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘A to C’ and disposed of accordingly. 5. Rule thus made absolute in the above terms. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/SEPT.2011/cri.rev.116-10