-: 1 :- wp- 2928/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2928 OF 2010 Aslam A. Haji. ..Petitioner. Versus The Cantonment Executive Officer. ..Respondent Mr. N. R. Bubna for the petitioner. Mr. K. J. Presswala, Sernior Advocate a/w Sandeep Goyal i/b M/s. Mulla & Mulla for the respondent. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : July 20, 2010. P. C. : 1. Mr. Bubna, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, after taking instructions from his client, makes a statement that within the period of three weeks from today, the petitioner will demolish the offending structure, namely, the ramp specified in the Notice dated 11th July 2005 issued under section 185 of the Cantonment Act, 1924. The statement is accepted. In view of the statement, Mr. Presswala, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent agrees that the aforesaid notice issued under section 185 of the Cantonment Act is rendered infructuous. Since the impugned notice does not survive, all further proceedings arising out of the said notice will also not survive for consideration. In the light of that, writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. srp -: 2 :- wp- 2928/10 2. However, it is clarified that in case the petitioner does not demolish the offending structure mentioned above, the authorities under the Cantonment Act are at liberty to demolish the same without giving any further notice to the petitioner. 3. Writ petition is disposed of in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, without going into the merit of the matter. (R.V. MORE, J.)