IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT’ BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) 7&8L WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. WRIT PETITION 1227) NO. 7/2010 PETITIONER ' w” — (PLAINTIFF) Jhadura‘m, aged about 45 yea, S/ o Natthuram Dewangan, R/o Sakti City Ward No. 7, Thana Sakti, Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir Champa (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS /1". Setram, aged about 4O years, (DEFENDANTS) S/ o Late Natthuram Dewangan, R/o Sakti Ward N0. 13, Tah. Sakti, District janjgir Champa (CG.) Pancharam, aged about 36 years, S/ o Late Natthuram Dewangan, R/o Sakti Ward N0. 13, Tah. Sakti, District Janjgir Champa (CG.) /3. Kachara Bai, aged about 50 years, D/ o Natthuram Dewangan, W/ o Amarlal Dewangan, R/o Balauda, Tah. Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa (CG.) 6 Mongara Bai, aged about 4 years, D/ o Late Natthuram Dewangan, W/ o Kunjram Dewangan, R/ o Kera, Tah. Janjgir (Navagarh), District janjgir Champa (CG.) Prembai, aged about 43 years, D/o Late Natthuram Dewangan, W/ o Tikararn Dewangan, R/ o Sakti Akhatbhata Sakti, Tah. Sakti, District janjgir Champa (CG.) , rs M n ]A _HIG C R EC G HATBI SPR ' WRIT PETI ! ION 1227! No. ,7§82 6f 2016 PLAmTIFF I Jhaduram l¢f% Setram and ethers. "’1 c0N§TlTUTlON OF QNQA 1§ingle Bench: Hon‘ble Shgi MK. Agafwal, J.) Presgnt :, Shri Sanjay s. Agrawal, counse: for the petnioqgr ORAL ORDER w (Passed on 03“ day of January, 2011) Heard on admission. 2. The instant peiition is directed against the order dated 22-10-2010 passed by Civil Judge; Class-ii, Sakti, in Civii Suit Ne;23-A/2009 rejecting the petitianer’s’ appiication LA. No.09/2010 for amendment under Order 6, Ruie 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘the C.P.C.). 3. Undisputediy, the relevant averments are already in the plaint. The petitioner's only intention in preferring the amendment petition was to elabprate the location of the land, for that, no ame/M6mentmis necessary and the location can be ‘Court in exercise of extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of india. ' 4. Accordingly, the petition being devoid of substance is liable to be and is hereby dismiseed. No order asto costs. l N.K. Agrawal é! / Sci/— 2 Judge l proved by the petitioner by leading eVidence in that behalf. in view of above, l do not find any illegality/irregularity leading to manifest injustice to the petitioner warranting interference of this a