aa PETrriONER HIOH COURT OFCHHATTISOARH: HL^PUR WRFT rermON (Sl NO. 43»OFZOOS Dhannendra Swaroop Jah, aged about 66 years, S/o Lats Shri Gl.. Jain, Rettred President, State Industrial Court and Presiding OfRcer, Industrial Tribunsd, Chhattisgarh, R/o D-2fflat No.8, Shri Ram Tower, Vyapar Vttiar, Btespur, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS Versus 1. State of ChhatBsgarh, Through : Swretaiy, Labow Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, .Mantrataya, Raipur, District Raipur, ChhatBsgarh. 2. President, Industriat Court, GhacK Chowk, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Rapur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Accountant General, ChhatBagarti, Near Old Bus Stand, Ra4>ur, District Raipur, ChhatBsgarh. (Writ pefiUon under Aiticte 226 of the ConstituUon <rf India) Singte Bench: Hon'bte ShriSadsh K. AgnU'iotri, J. Present: ShriRanbtrSJnghMarhas.Counsetforthepetitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panet Lawyerfor <he Stete. .QRreR (PassedonthisydayofAugust, 2008) With e consent of teamed counsel appearing fw Uie |Mirties, the peBSon ts heard finally. 2) Leamed counsel appearing fbr the peBBoner submits tert the petitioner has approached the Penskwi Committee to took into his griewinces, but ttie said Committee declined td ertertan the applicaGon fited by the peSBoner on the ground that the Pension CommUtee may loolc into those matters only, whfch are referred by the High Cairt. A oopyrffte WSer No.1426/2008 dated 30-7-2008 sent by the General Adminisbr^ion Department, Govemment of ChltatUsgarti to the petiUoner In Uiis regard hss been produced b^orethis Court. The same istaken on recortl. 3) This Court In the msrtter of Smt Kanti Shanna vs. Sterta of ChhatSsgarh & Others {W.P(S) N6.4034/2008} dedded on 2^7-2008 white direcUng ttie p^hmer to approach the Penston Committse for ^ 't: redresseal of her grievancesin regard to non-grant of retrial dues, has afeo directed as under: 'ln case of griewsnce wW» nagancf to non-paymont of'pwisoiiwy dues, it Is not neeesswytotileawritpeStton b^ora »s Court dbecfly. The /i^»®s®»tetion< appScaSon can be mcwed befoie the Pen®onCommiUae asstatedatxwe. Tbe Penston CommBtee shaff nof reft/se to enf»ta«r» e fl^wBsenfefibro&ppfcatfoo, so (Steddroctfy." 4) tn view of the foregoing reasons, <he Penston CommiUea vrill took into the matter ot ttie present peBtioner accordm^y and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, on ite ownmerits. Q Wdh theaforesaid (Asefvations, the p^lfons atands dfeposed of, Gowri Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge