IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPEAL UNDER E.S.I. NO. 4 OF 2007 EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION THROUGH REGIONAL DIRECTOR ... Appellant Versus M/S. PENTON TECHNOLOGY REPRESENTED BY ATTORNEY MR. VIJAY DIKWALKAR ... Respondent Ms. Ashwini Agni for the Appellant. Mr. V. A. Palekar for the Respondent. Coram:- S.A. BOBDE, J. Date:- 1st April, 2008 P.C. : 1. Heard by consent. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant, in view of the document permitted to be brought on record vide a Misc. Civil Application No. 802 of 2007, submits that the said document shows a functional integrality between the Unit at Mumbai and the Unit at Goa. This document was apparently not available but it has a bearing on the question of functional integrality. Having regard to the circumstances of the case, I am of view that the question of functional integrality needs to be decided afresh after taking into account all the relevant documents. The fact that certain relevant documents were left out when the decision was taken by the lower court is not in dispute. In my view, ignorance of relevant document gives rise to a substantial question of law and which goes to the root of the matter. Hence, the matter is remanded back to the E.S.I. Court for fresh decision in accordance with the law. All questions are left upon. 3. Appeal disposed of accordingly. S.A. BOBDE, J. skc