oo(^- MTHEfflQHOOURT OF CHHA'ETI^SARH AT BILASPUR Vftit Petition No.£2-&l°/2(XB p] [ONER BasantKiimaTBabar, S/oSTdEisahu Bao Babar, Ag^. about 58 yeare, Stib Engneer (Offidating &D.O.), E & M PublicWorks Departnient (P.W.D.), Korea, Sub-DL'wsian, BaiktBtthpur (CG.). - Vasu&- RBFONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh, Throughfhe Secretaiy, PubUc Works Department, MfltTtralaya, D.KS. Bhawan, Shastri Chowk, Eaipur (CG) Unde'rSecretaiy, PubUc Works Departanent, Marriralaya, D.K& Bhawan, Raipur(CG.). ^^•/ fYl' .c<$"^"', <^%? 7<€'^r / 3. gmL.N.Agarwal, ^ __^ .<?'^ P'Q"'' S/oariQM.Agarwal t-'~^" /'' Aged about 59 years,, < A<S^> WoitemgasInchai^S.Dia ^ ^ hfaIiasaiiiuiidSubI.&viBk>n, -'ivf Public Wcri®EtepartiTKTit, Mahasamund (CG.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227'OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR EXTENSION OF TIMETO MOVEREPRESENTATION. - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATriSGARH:BILASPlTR Single Beach: Hon'ble Shrl Satisti K. Agnihotri, J. W. P. No.2810 QF 20Q3_ Petitioner : Basant Kuiiiar Babar Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others Shri Viaay Pandey, couilsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel lawyer for the respondents No. 1 and2/State. None for ftie respondent No. 3. ORALORDER (16th February, 2006) Leamed counsel for fhe petitioner submits on uistruction that the inatter Uas becoine infi-uctuous wifh fhe passage of tlTne, to which leamed counsel for the respondents No. 1 and 2 has ao objection. The writ petition is-disinissed asihaving becoiue ixifructuous. No order ^ to costs. ! f satish_K.Agu,fiotri Bablu