IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.571/2011 Date of decision:31.1.2011. Mahant Sher Singh .............Petitioner v Jarnail Singh and others ..............Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present:- Mr.Madan Gupta,Advocate for the petitioner. Jaswant Singh,J(Oral). Plaintiff/petitioner has approached this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution assailing the order dated 20.1.2011 (P4) whereby his application (P1) for leading additional evidence has been dismissed. Briefly the facts are that plaintiff/petitioner had suffered a decree dated 29.11.1983 in favour of his brother/ respondent no.1 -Jarnail Singh on the basis of an alleged family settlement. It appears that respondent no.1 thereafter had sold the property by various sale deeds. Plaintiff/petitioner on 2.11.2001 filed the present suit for declaration challenging the decree dated 29.11.1983 as well as the subsequent sale deeds. The defendant/respondent no.1 filed his written statement on 11.2.2002. He also examined DW5 Yash Pal- Hand Writing Expert to prove his report whereby it was asserted that the standard signatures of the plaintiff/petitioner matched with his signatures on the Power of Attorney filed and the written statement filed in the suit decreed on 29.11.1983. However, the subsequent vendees/purchasers (defendant Nos.8 to 13) were proceeded ex parte. Plaintiff/petitioner closed his evidence on 31.1.2009. Defendants 8 to 13 subsequently were permitted to join the proceedings on 31.3.2010 and they filed their written statement on 10.4.2010. During the cross examination of the plaintiff by defendants 8 to 13, aforesaid application was moved for additional evidence for examination of a Handwriting Expert-Sh.N.K.Jain and proving his report dated 1.4.2009 as a counter to the evidence tendered by Yash Pal-Handwriting Expert examined by respondent no.1/defendant. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedy available under the law at appropriate stage. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. 31.1.2011. (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge