1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.412 OF 1998 Mustaq Khan Dilawarkhan Pathan and another. ..Petitioners V/s Mishrilal Fulchand Sancheti ..Respondent ......... Mr.S.S. Kulkarni holding for Mr.S.D. Kulkarni, Advocate for petitioners. ........ (CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) DATE : 7th May, 2010. PER COURT : 1. The petition is old one, counsel seeks time to verify fact situation as regards execution of decree. It appears that Regular Darkast no.188/1983 was filed and petitioners' objection was rejected, no interim relief was granted. Hence in all probabilities, by now execution might have been effected. The petition is therefore dismissed as infructuous. Liberty granted to the petitioners to move this Court, if it is found that Darkast is still pending, in order to seek revival of Petition. (V.R.KINGAONKAR) JUDGE gas/wp412.98 2