IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17228 of 2011 Bharat Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 27.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 414, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. One stolen Tavera vehicle was recovered from the garage of one Md. Danish who disclosed that owner of Tavera vehicle is Mahendra Thakur but the driver Ashok brought the vehicle in the garage. Subsequently it was found that Mahendra Thakur died two years prior to occurrence then it is suspected that the driver Ashok is the employee of the petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the garage owner has not been made accused and the Ashok has never been driver of the petitioner and there is nothing on record to suggest that the vehicle was brought by the petitioner in the garage. Considering the ownership inconsistencies in the prosecution case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger, in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 227 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)