1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL (L) NO. 366 OF 2009 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.9 OF 2009 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 12 OF 2007 Liladevi Devilalji Hiran and Anr. ..Appellants Vs. Kesharimal Champalalji Kothari ..Respondent .... Mr.P.N.Kulkarni for Appellants Mr.Ramesh Jain for Respondent .... CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : 6th JANUARY, 2010 P.C.: 1. Heard Mr.Kulkarni, the learned counsel for the Appellants. The Appellants had sought unconditional leave to defend Summary Suit No.12 of 2007 and leave to defend has been granted on the condition of depositing of Rs. 2 lakhs within eight weeks by the impugned order dated 8th April, 2009. 2. The learned Judge noted that the suit was filed upon the Bill of 2 Exchange dated 7th December, 2004 for 2 lakhs signed by the Defendant No.1 and accepted by Defendant No.2 and the part payment received upon the Bill of Exchange, came to be credited. The recovery prayed for in the Suit is for an amount of Rs.2,28,984/- and further interest at the rate of 18% per annum. The Plaintiff was in the employment of the Defendants and this relationship is not disputed. 3. We therefore, find no error with the view taken by the learned Single Judge in granting leave to defend on the condition of depositing of Rs. 2 lakhs. Appeal is dismissed. [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [ B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. ]