•ysNoiiiiad 3Hi do savinoiiyvd ^1C[95^%1i •^'\^^^9 /VTaNldO NOIiniliSNOO 3HI jo ffziwz ^^^liav aaaNn Noiiiiad iiym '(•9'0) 6jna - 'ttsiQ 'eqpLue^a ''jeoiyo uoiieonpg )|oo|g •'y (•9-0) Bjna - -USIQ '6jna Jsojyo uoi}eonp3 pyisia jndiey •IAO£)qjeBsiueLiyo '}U9uu}jedea uoipnjisu) ojiqnd ^ 'JOpOJIQ 9L|1 ('O'O) Jndiey 'ueMeqg 'S'X'Q 'iueujijedea uoiieonp3 'Ajeiejoes 941 - q6nojqi ^/4j6s!HeL|L|o ^o sfets ,....^ ..••;-;'3^s',»3sa^ //-•^wat",.^ "rl .»-••• ') ''..'-"•'.° ^^,...."""/'.^ 5 -< o^ no t(l. -o ',^. ^^^^ ^05-9^ siNaaNOdsaa snsyaA (•o'o) 6jna - -HSIQ 'eqpLueqa - )|oo|g 'ejeiuun •Od 'e>|jepue» '100403 Ajeiuud •1AOQ 'JSL|OE91 IUEISISSV 'SJBSA ^fr inoqe ps6e 'pesejd ueAejeueAiBg ^-ui|S 'o/s 'pesejd jeuun>| iiuy y3N0111i3d 900Z7'~^.»7^> 'ON (S)"dW HMV9SIAAVHH3 und8wiia iw aiinj-voianr do j-ynoo HOIH aHi NI SM'33 Jt'4.31 CI-HC-78 HI*<CTT»)*1|ch f9rz^ a^^ipncpr, wTfl.u'K?, Rfcfiyy 'CiL v A rto- ^ 200 Sii^i <<atn (>i<:<I^'sl<{<T) I^TWf^Iffi iTa.n^rginw fc- 06,12,2006 Shri Vipin Tiwari, tearned Smt. Anju Aahuja, learned G cou|nsel for the petitioner. )A. for the Sate/respondent. By this petition under Articlel the petitioner seeks a direction to and seniority on the basis of the di of the decision rendered by the Jabalpur in Original Application No| others Vs. State of M.P. and rthersl e^ 226/227 of the Constitution of India, t|ie resporidents to pay the increments E|te af his initial appointment in the light (earned State Administrative Tribunal, 2745/1989 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 idated 24.8.1992 2. Leamed counsel appearing 1| order dated 9th October 2006 pass^ 5473/2006 (Rakesh Kumar Sharma) and others) and in Writ Petition (^ State of Chhattisgarh and other^ similarly situated, therefore, the simji 3. The case of the petitioner Teacher'in the School Education Q two years \Mth the fixed salary. Ho\ years' probation, the petitioner wa^ regular pay scale. Other similarl't' Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Tribunal vide order dated 24.8.1$ made several representations to a| ^rat?pfrr WRffff te^ tfSreerc ^Sff^ITSn^T l|or the petitioner placed reliance on the |id bythis Court in Writ Petition (S) No. and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh j) No. 5474/2006 (Jai Nath Bajpai Vs. ^) and submits that the petitioner is iilar order may be passed. that he was appointed as Assistant jepartment on probation for a period of (wever, later on, after completion oftwo regularized but, he was not given the situated teachers moved the State (or regular pay-scale, wherein learned 1 $92 allo\wed the same. The petitioner scord the same treatment as he is also T.0. XI-HC-78 HIHOI ShW^i ?s?^iraRpT, ®tf1.ti'i<o,Rfcfiyy Oa.P^o-a^/0^ ^ 200 3li^sfl 4a<n (l?!^'5!^) sfn^T^s R-fi+ craTW^Tshlitti •c. ^ ^tRRnfWsn^T similariy situated, but, the respond^nts have not paid any heed. Thus, this petition. 4. Leamed counsel for the pe| be allowed to make a representa^ treatment to the petitioner and sarr^ to other similarly situated teacherj Administrative Tribunal dated 24.81 respondent/State has no objection.] 5. Having heard learned coun^ limited prayer made by learned c^ reasonable. Therefore, the petition within a period oftwo weeks from 'oiiTci'fl'i t)iticiT^'te<^'<('»i«i< ^SI^TTSn^T iitioner submits that the petitioner may jon to respondent No.1 to give similar p pay-seate which has been sanctioned s on account of the order of the State i1992, to which leamed counsel for the el for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances ofth4case, in the opinion of this Court, the lunsel for the petitioner appears to be ?r is allowed to make a representation pdayto respondent No.1, raising all his grievances and, in turn, resp^ndent No.1 shall decide the said representation in an objective man^er within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of such represen raised by the petitioner and taking iation, after considering all the points iinto account the order dated 24.8.1992 passed by the learned State Admirlistrative Tribunal in Originai Application No. 2745/1989. ^•- 6. The writ petition is accor^ingly disposed of with the aforesaid direction. No order as to costs. 7. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- Dhirednra Mishra Judge P.T.O.