THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.18434 of 2009 Dated 15th April, 2011 Between: G.Jani Miya …Petitioner And The Commissioner of Transport, A.P., at Hyderabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri G.L.Narasimha Rao Counsel for respondents: GP for Transport The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not renewing the Fitness Certificate of Petitioner’s vehicle bearing No.AP-24/W-8391 under the guise of fixation of speed governance to my vehicle as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Rule 62 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith renew the petitioner’s vehicle’s Fitness Certificate.” At the hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.24122 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 15th April, 2011 VGB