1 wp6130.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6130 OF 2011 (BHUSHAN KHUSHAL PATIL VS. SADASHIV CHAGAN PATIL & ORS.) Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 26.08.2011 Mr. U.S. Patil, Advocate for the petitioner. 1. The petition is not maintainable. The petitioner is not party to the suit in which the impugned order has been passed. The respondents are parties to the suit. It appears that one of the respondents obtained the order of temporary injunction against other respondents and the order was in respect of use of water of Well situated in an agricultural land. One of the respondents further obtained the impugned order in which the learned Judge of the Trial Court provided him police aid for implementation of the order of temporary injunction with 2 wp6130.11 police help, so that he would be able to gain access to the Well in question and draw water. In this background, the petitioner has come to this Court with a case that he is owner of the Well and that the order providing police aid is likely to cause prejudice to him. I am afraid, the petitioner cannot make such grievance by filing the writ petition. If he succeeds to become party to the existing suit, then alone he would be able to make application to the Trial Court for getting the impugned order set aside etc. If the petitioner makes an application to the Trial Court for becoming party, the same can be decided on merit. The petition stands dismissed. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] snk/2011/AUG11/wp6130.11