HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED S.A .No. 943 of 2011 JUDGMENT: This Second Appeal has been filed aggrieved by the decree and judgment dated 28.04.2011 passed in A.S.No. 104 of 2009 by the XIII Additional Chief Judge (FTC) City Civil Court, Hyderabad, confirming the judgment and decree dated 03.10.2007 passed in O.S.No. 278 of 2002 by the VII Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Appellant herein is the defendant and the respondent herein is the plaintiff in the suit viz., O.S.No. 278 of 2002. The suit was filed for recovery of an amount of Rs. 64,639.39 ps together with interest @ 10% per annum from the date of suit till realization due from the defendant in respect of the work done by the workers of the plaintiff’s company, for costs and subsequent interest. That suit was decreed with costs in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant for Rs. 64,639-39 ps with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till the date of decree and subsequent interest @ 6% per annum on the outstanding balance of Rs. 51,697/- from the date of decree till the date of realization. Aggrieved by the same, appellant- defendant filed appeal in A.S.No. 104 of 2009 and the appellant court dismissed the appeal with costs and directed that the plaintiff is entitled for the suit claim and also for interest @ 10% per annum on the principal amount of Rs. 51,697 from the date of suit till the date of decree and the interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till realization. Aggrieved by the same, the present Second Appeal is filed. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant-defendant and also perused the entire material made available on record. I have perused the order impugned. The trial court considered the matter elaborately and decreed the suit. On appeal, the appellate court dismissed the appeal with costs confirming the decree and judgment of the trial Court. It is well settled by a catena of decisions of the Supreme Court that in the second appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, this Court cannot interfere with the findings of fact arrived at by both the Courts below. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant and on perusing the grounds in the memorandum of second appeal, this Court is of the view that the substantial questions of law framed in the second appeal involve appreciation of facts and evidence on record, which both the Courts below have elaborately considered. This Court cannot once again appreciate the facts and evidence on record, that too, in the second appeal. In the above circumstances, there is no question of law much less substantial question of law, warranting interference with the impugned judgment by this court. The Second Appeal is dismissed at the stage of admission. ______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J DATE: 12.08.2011 KA