IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9332 of 2010 1. DUDHESHWAR CHAUDHARY @ DUSHESHWAR CHAUDHARY , SON OF LATE SAGAR CHAUDHARY 2. SANJEET CHAUDHARY @ SANJEET RAJ, SON OF DUDHESHWAR CHAUDHARY. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17/03/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 506, 379, 504, 323, 341, 147, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code was added. It has been submitted that from the narrative of the First Information Report, the object of the miscreants was to assault and theft was incidental to the said assault and, therefore, no offence under Section 395 I.P.C. would be made out. However, considering that the petitioners have been identified by four witnesses, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)