IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 24210 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: October 28, 2010. Rajesh ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. G.S.Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.M.Anand, Addl.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.98 dated 10.04.2010, under Sections 307/498-A IPC, registered at Police Station city Narwana, District jind. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the present FIR is a result of matrimonial discord between petitioner and his wife, who is complainant in this case and that however, the matter has since CRM No.M-24210 of 2010 been settled and that complainant did not support the version of prosecution when she appeared as a witness before learned trial Court on 08.10.2010. He has also contended that even other witnesses i.e. PW2 –Ram Kishan, PW3 – Santosh, PW4 –Raj Kumar and PW5 –Manna have not supported the prosecution version. He has also placed on record certified copies of the statements recorded by learned Sessions Judge, Jind. Learned counsel for the State has not disputed these facts. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant application for regular bail filed on behalf of Rajesh is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Jind. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) October 28, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2