IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2206 of 2009(O&M) Date of decision: 17.12.2009 Chanan Singh and others ......Petitioner(s) Versus Gursahib Singh and others ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Sandeep Jasuja, Advocate for the petitioners. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) CM No.29549-CII of 2009 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. COCP No.2206 of 2009 As per the averments made in this case, vide order dated 18.9.2004 passed in RSA No.969 of 2000, the respondents were restrained from alienating the suit property to any third person. The grievance of the petitioners before this Court is that despite the aforesaid stay order, the respondents have alienated the suit property in favour of third person during the pendency of the aforesaid order. Be that as it may, the doctrine of lis pendens is attracted in the present case and the petitioner has an effective remedy of filing an appropriate application in RSA No.969 of 2000. Therefore, I am not inclined to take cognizance of this petition which has been filed after about three years of the execution of the alleged sale deeds. Dismissed. December 17, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE