ssm 1 23.wp.2073.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2073 OF 2011 Sanjay Jaiprakash Gupta ....Petitioner Versus Chedilal Mataprasad Gupta ....Respondent ___________ Mr. V. S. Kapse for the Petitioner. CORAM: B. R. GAVAI, J. DATED : 15 TH MARCH, 2011 P.C.: By way of this Petition, Petitioner challenges the order dated 19 th January, 2011, vide which the Chamber Summons filed by the Defendant No. 1 for amendment to the written statement, came to be rejected. 2. Mr. Kapse, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that since by way of amendment, the Petitioner desired only to carry out certain corrections which were inadvertently committed by the earlier Counsel, the application for amendment ought to have been allowed. ssm 2 23.wp.2073.11 Admittedly, the suit is filed on 1 st July, 2002. Admittedly, the Affidavit in lieu of examination in chief on behalf of the Plaintiff has already been filed as such the trial has already commenced. Had the Petitioner exercise of due diligence, he could have very well brought on record the present amendment prior to commencement of trial. 3. In that view of matter, as per the provisions of Order VI Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code, no error could be found with the order issued by the Trial Court and no interference is warranted. Hence, rejected. (B. R. GAVAI, J)