CWP No. 748 of 2002 3.6.2008 Present: Mr. B.C.Negi, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Anup Rattan, Central Government Counsel, for respondents No. 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5. Mr. Pramod Singh Thakur, counsel for respondent No. 7. Heard Mr. B.C. Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Anup Rattan, learned Central Government Counsel for respondents No. 1 to 5 and Mr. Pramod Singh Thakur, learned counsel for respondent No. 7. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred against the order dated 21.2.2002, passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh in O.A. No. 1037/HP/2001 whereby, keeping in view the prayers of the petitioners challenging their termination from the deployment from Special Area Games and the prayer for regularization of their services on the basis of their experience and capability, the learned Tribunal by the impugned order has directed that the respondents must consider the petitioners for regularization of their services by granting relaxation in age to the extent as they have served with respondents and such regularization was to be considered on creation of vacancies of posts of LDCs in a new or old centres in northern region on their being agreeable even in the region outside the northern region. According to learned counsel for the petitioners subsequent to the passing of this order some person has been appointed on contractual basis to the cadre and some scheme has been circulated whereby vacancies sufficient in number are available. However, this aspect has not been denied by the learned counsel for the respondents for lack of instructions, however, this court is not willing to make any observations to that effect. However, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner since the positive response of the respondents has not been forthcoming, therefore, the present writ petition has been preferred. However, keeping in view the best interest of the petitioner and in the prevailing facts and circumstances, prayer is being made that the compliance of the order dated 21.2.2002 passed by the learned Tribunal in O.A. No. 1037/HP/2001 may be made for considering the availability of vacancies and the scheme prevalent. At present the learned counsel for the petitioner is not pressing the present writ petition. However, a prayer is being made that if the petitioners are not considered favourably, then a liberty may be granted to the petitioners to approach this court against the said subsequent decision to be taken by the respondents. In our considered opinion, it goes without saying that any one is free to challenge any order in view of the provisions of the law. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case and also keeping in view the prayer made by the petitioners, the writ petition is disposed of as not pressed. We express our trust and hope that the grievances of the petitioners would be considered in the light of observations made in the order dated 21.2.2002 within 3 months from today. CMP Nos. 1743/2003 & 1307/2008 In view of the disposal of the main petition, these applications have become infructuous and are dismissed as such. ( R. B.Misra ), J. June 3, 2008(K) ( Sanjay Karol ), J.