IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1818 of 2011 1. SUCHIT TANTI 2. RAJESH KUMAR @ RAJESH TANTI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 18.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant's daughter was taken out from the well when she died. Since there is enmity since last 20 years, hence, it is suspected by the informant that the petitioners throttled the neck of the victim and threw into the well. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the informant himself has admitted in para 29 of the case diary that the victim fell down in the well and the witnesses have suggested that the well was at the surface level and the petitioners and their families members tried to take out the victim from the well. It is submitted by learned counsel for the 2 State that the petitioner used to give threat to the informant though, no injury was found on the neck of the victim. Considering the suspicious nature of evidence, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Amarpur (Fullidumar) P.S. Case No. 206/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)