max « @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAWI AT BELASPUR Dwasmw nmv‘u CGRAM: HGN’ELE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HO J’BLE SHPJ SL‘NIL KUMAR sENHA, J. Misc. Anneai No.7§9l'2'6f)$ Annenant Sukui Ram, S/o Devcharan Sahu, Aged maimant about 4G years, I’c V?“ Odan PO Odan {Paiaré}, Distt Raipur (CG) VERSUS Resnondents SM Bhagwan Ji Shah, S/o Motimai Nm—a-rjp%6%%s Shah by Smt ‘mfajeet Kaur Wis Tarsem Singh, Rio ‘Quar‘ier MEWS/36? Vaishaii Nagar BhHai, " Distt Durg (CG) Smt Indrajeet Kaur W/o Tarsem Singh, R/c VaishaH Nagar Quarter MEWS/367 Bhiiai, Distt Durg 8 The New India‘l'nsurance Co. Ltd., By Divisionak Manager, The New mdia ‘ msurance Co. Ltd., Kachahari Chowk, V Raipur isc. £9 eai under Section 1’73 sf the Motar Vehici Act. 1%33 ‘ Present : Shri SC Verma, counsei forthe appeiiants. Shri Dasarath Gupta, counse: for responden No.3. \\\\ e , GREEE ‘ mm August, 2999; The feiEowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gama, CJ. Learned counsei for the parties are heard on MCF’ No.108912006, a petition for condonation of the deiay in fiiing the appeai 2) On due consideration of the submissions of iearned counsel ”" u for the parties and the grounds taken in the application, we are "’ M es @ satisfied that the appellant has succeeded in showing sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal. 3) Leamed counsel forthe parties are heard on admission. 4) Appellant SLlkul Ram has filed this appeal against the impugned award dated 31 .0320D5 passed by the 14‘“ Additionai Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Raipur (for short, “the Tribunal”), passed in Claim Case No.94/2004, whereby the appellant’s claim petition was dismissed holding that driver of the truck bearing registration No.MP-23IDNO346 was responsible for the accident, whereas the claimant has sought compensation from the owner and insurer of truck bearing registration No. MP—23IDAI4D29. 2) 8hrt SC Verma, learned counsei for the appettant seeks permission to withdraw the Claim Petition filed by the appellant] claimant against the driver, owner and insurer of truck bearing registration NoiViP—23/DAI4029, with liberty of filing another ciaim petition against the driver, .oWner and insurer of truck bearing registration NoMP-23IEA/G346. 3) Permission granted. '4) With the above iiberty, the Ciaim Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. g ‘ 5) With the above order, the appeal also stands disposed of. Sd/. sw- Chief Justice Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge-Ti, W t , padma #4 \‘\ ,_ K.