^l rs IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P.fS)No. ^^^/ /20ii PETITIONER RESPONDENTS opy'cV / ^w/^' ^\ 1] Prakash Balaji Kusare, S/o. Late Balaji Kusare, aged about 68 years, R/o. 16/249, Talapara, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through: Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2]/ Joint Director, Accounts 81 Pension, Nagar Ghadi Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur(C.G.) /' 3] Divisional Joint Director, Division Raipur, Accounts & Pension, Nagar Ghadi Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) f'r 4] Commissioner, Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh, In the campus of Office of Secondary Board of Education, Pension Bada, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5J ' District Education Officer, Raipur, DistrictRaipur(C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ft SB : HON'BLE BSR. JUSTICE PRITINKSR DIWAKBR versus Prakash Balaji Kusare State of Chhatdsgarh & Others Shri Manoj Paraajape, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.Naha Roy, P.L. for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THS CONSTiTUTION (16.11.2011) Grievance of tlie petitioner in tlie present petition is that though fhe benefit of second tiine bound proinotion is graated to him vide order dated 20.07.09 but the amount of gratuity has not becn determined on fhe basis of fhe new pay scale granted to fhe petitioner. Counsel for fhe petitioner subiuits that purpose of filing fhis petition would toe served tfdirection is issued to fhe respondent N0.1 to decide ftie pending representation (Annexure P/4) ofthe petitioner. State counsel subinits that he has no objection tf the pendinj representatioii of the petitioner is decided subject to his eatifleiuent for the arrears of gratuity. The present petition is disposed of wifh a direction to the respondent No.l to decide the peuding representation of fhe petitioner if already not decided, as expeditiously as possible, ia accordance wifh law. It is m.ade clear that this court has not expressed aay opiaion on fhe inerits of the case and tiie authoriw conceraed would be at liberty to decide the representation stncfly in accordance with law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker -.Judge