IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 12.11.2010 C.R.No.7390 of 2010 (O&M) Mahinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus Kirpal Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Naresh Gopal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present petition is to an order passed by the learned Executing Court on 07.10.2009, whereby the objection to the decree for possession dated 22.07.2002 was dismissed. The petitioner alleges to have purchased property from Mukand Lal (Mukandi), predecessor-in-interest of the plaintiff in the year 1986 on payment of Rs.300/-. Learned Executing Court has found that the objector has failed to prove any document of title. Since, the petitioner has failed to prove any document of title, the objection has been rightly dismissed by the learned Executing Court. In view thereof, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the order passed by the learned Executing Court, which may warrant any interference in exercise of the revisional jurisdiction of this Court. Dismissed. 12.11.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE