IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-26364 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.03.2011 Sukhwinder Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jaspreet Singh, AAG, Punjab. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Mr. Jaspreet Singh, learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, on the instructions of ASI Jarnail Singh, has stated that all the prosecution witnesses have already been examined and case is fixed for today for statement of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. On the statement of learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, Mr. Vikas Bahl, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition at this stage, however, he has stated that learned trial Court be directed to expedite the trial. Dismissed as withdrawn. However, learned trial Court is requested to expedite the trial and not to grant unnecessary adjournments. (Alok Singh) Judge March 17, 2011 R.S.