IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2074 of 2007 SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 03- 4.12.2008 Heard Mr. Arvind Kumar II for the petitioner, and Mr. Sarvadeo Singh, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the Central Government. This application has been filed by the petitioner of CWJC No. 7029 of 1999 for recall of the order dated 3.7.2000, whereby the writ petition was dismissed on account of non- prosecution. 2. The writ petition was dismissed by order dated 3.7.2000, and the present restoration application was filed on 29.8.2007. Neither the applicant nor learned counsel for the petitioner has offered any explanation for the delay in preferring this application. Furthermore, it appears from a perusal of the series of orders on the writ petition that learned counsel for the petitioner was aware of the developments in the matter and it was coming up at an interval of one week. In fact, it was on the board on 3.7.2000 at the instance of the petitioner. But he did not take care. It is not possible to entertain this belated and frivolous application. 3. The MJC application is accordingly rejected. ( S K Katriar ) mrl - 2 -