IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42429 of 2008 1.MD.SHAMSAD, son of Md. Yakub 2.MD. ISHAQUE, son of Md. Yakub 3.TETRI KHATOON, wife of Md. Yakub 4.MD. YAKUB, son of Late Rasool Mian All resident of Village Charaparwaha, P.S. Forbesganj, District Araria --------Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.12.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.680C of 2008 for the alleged offences registered under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the present complaint has been filed for ulterior purpose. The allegations are general in nature. It is submitted that the allegations are against the petitioners no.1 and 2 and those are also vague. However, petitioners no.3 and 4 have been dragged in this case only to harass them. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegations, let petitioners no.3 and 4, namely, Tetri Khatoon and Md Yakub , respectively, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case No.680C of 2008, within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in connection with the 2 aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. So far as the prayer for bail made on behalf of petitioners no.1 and 2, Md. Shamsad and Md. Ishaque respectively, are concerned, considering the nature of allegations attributed against them, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to them. Accordingly, this application, as against petitioners no.1 and 2, is dismissed. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)