HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 363 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 363 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 363 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.926 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.926 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.926 OF 2004 Shalini Popat Yadav ... Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. M.S. Karnik for the Applicant. Ms. M.M. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATED: APRIL 21, 2008 DATED: APRIL 21, 2008 DATED: APRIL 21, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Earlier an application for bail was rejected by this court by order dated 7.12.2004. According to applicant, she is in jail since 2001. The appeal has not yet come for hearing. The learned counsel therefore, submits that this will be a fit case to grant bail considering that the applicant is a female and she has a marriageable daughter. . The bail was earlier rejected. The only cause that can be made out is that there are subsequent events. The reasons given cannot be considered as subsequent events. The appeal will be heard on its own turn. Application for bail rejected. (K.V.CHANDIWAL, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (K.V.CHANDIWAL, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (K.V.CHANDIWAL, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)