3“: ‘E: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR(C.G) MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.g3‘9 2005 @WEM {gwch APPELLANT y/Santan Das Bandhe, Aged about 31 years, a CLAIMANT S/o. Hanu Das Satnami, R/o. Village Balesur, P.O. Mohra, P.S. Suhela, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS / My Khel Singh Baghei, 5/0. Jagdish Prasad ’ NON-APPLICANT v Baghel, R/o. Viliage Bhalesur, P.O. Mohra, a9}“w A $73} District Suhela, (C.G) w T-he. New India Inegrance Company 0". Limited, Through DIVislonal Manager, Divisional Ofnce Kachahari Chowk, Jail wig. Miscellaneous Road, Raipur (C.G) under/section‘y173 Sahu Noné’fé. he appellant. Shri Suresh Tandon, Advm > vShri Dashrath Gupta, Advo :ate for the respondent No.1. List is being” revised. Case is called out. No one is present on beh f of the appellant to press this appeaL Therefone, we have no oth ar option except to dismiss the appeal in the absence of any onepfor the appellant. Therefore, the appeal prosecution. Sd/- N.K. AGARWAL Judge Judge t ‘ate for respondent No. 2. sub r t.M.Qudd“5‘, is dismissed for want of mm Ma'— 8 .. Fizoo5 mm (WEI) m '05!W am 31mm m mam WW WET fséW 3? aim mm i, Division Bench. Hon’ble ShrihMgmddusi & Hon’ble ShriN; @Aqarwal, JJ. 30.11.2010