HIGHCOl«TOFCHHATTIS©ftRHATBtl.ASPUR DIVISIONBEMGH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GURTA, GJ & HON'BLE SHRtSUNU.. KUiyi^SiNHA, J. WritADpealNo.192or M07 Appellant No. 1 Respondent No. 1 ADDellant^to.2 Respondent No. 2 RespondentNo. 1 Petitioner RespondentNo.2 Respondciit No.3 Respondent No. 3 Respondent No.4 Respondent No. 4 Respondent Ato.S StateofChhattisgaFh,1tiroyghits Secretary, Departmenf crf Higher Edueation, D.K.S, Bliawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Commissioner, Higher E&icatlon Govemment ofCtihatti^garh, Government Scienee Ctrtlege Campus, H<%te! No. 4, Raipur (Ghhattisgarh) VERSUS Prof. (Dr.)S.C. Shrivastavaaged 62yeais, S/oShri Ram Ryarela! Shrivastava, RetireAPFofessor (Economfcs), C.M. Dube Coilege, Bilaspur (Ghhattisgarh) R/o 600/14 Vinoba Nagar, Bila^ur (Chhattisgarh) C.M. DubeyShtkNiaSamiti, throug!i Sanjay Dubey, worklng Ghairman (sinee Bftagwat Dube, Chairman died), R/oSadar Bazar, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Governing Body, C.M. Dubey College through its Secretary/ Prineipal, C.M. Dube Gollege, Bilaspur (C.G.) PrinGipal, C.M. Dubey College, UnkRoad, Bilaspur. Writ appeal under Seetion 2(1) of the phhattl^arh Hiph Court fappeai to Division BenehIAct 20% Present: Shri Kishore Bhadun, leamed Actelitional Advoeate General fbr theappetlants/State. IdJUUL ShriSameer Sahu, leamedcounsel for respondent No. 4 (Caveator). None appears for respondents No. 1, 2 S 3. JUDGMENT (08th February, 2808) The foltowing judgment of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, leamed Addittonal Advocate Generat for the appellants, in view of the fact that notiflGation dated 21-09-1992 could not be brought to the notice of the writ Court, seeks permission to withdraw the writ a^ieal with liberty of filing a review petition. (2) Permission granted. (3) With the above liberty, writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Sunii Kumar Sinha Judge Subbu