IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC(T) No. 164 of 2008 Decided on: 01.10.2010 Er. Jawahar Lal Sharma …Petitioner Versus Er. R.P. Verma and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate vice Mr.Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : None. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Umesh Kanwar, learned vice counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening development. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 1, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?