IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-449 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 10, 2011 Navjot Kaur @ Jyoti. …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Bhavna Gupta, D.A.G., Punjab, for the respondent-State. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 16, dated 03.06.2010, under Sections 302, 364, 201, 34, 120-B IPC read with Section 27, 54, 59 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Tarsikka, District Amritsar. Learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, on the instructions of SI Arun Sharma, Investigating Officer, who is CRM M-449 of 2011 present in person, has stated that petitioner has joined investigation, however, has argued that considering the gravity of the offence, petitioner is not entitled to be enlarged on bail. On being asked, the Investigating Officer does not make any request for custodial interrogation of the petitioner. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. Order dated 18.01.2011 is made absolute, subject to the limitations provided under Section 438(2) of the Code. Petitioner-accused shall participate in the investigation as and when she is required. February 10, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2