CWP No.11800 of 2008.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.11800 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.02.2010 **** Jaswant Singh . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab and another . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Ms. Alka Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Charu Tuli, Sr. DAG, Punjab Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate for respondent No.4 & 5 ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). Cost has been deposited. (2). Learned State counsel submits that necessary recommendations for appointment of the petitioner as Art and Crafts Teacher, has already been made. (3). The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of, however, with a clarification that in case the appointment letter has not been issued to the petitioner so far, the needful shall be done within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of CWP No.11800 of 2008.doc - 2 – certified copy of this order. Needless to say that for seniority purposes, the appointment of the petitioner shall relate back to the date when candidate(s) lower in merit were appointed. (4). Dasti . (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 01.02.2010 vishal shonkar