[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.3854 OF 2006 Virendra Ramashray Roy ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.K.N.Kore i/b A.O.Shukla counsel for Applicant Mr.D.P.Adsule A.P.P. for the State Mr.V.K.Singh for Respondent no.2 to 11. ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : MARCH 7, 2007 DATE : MARCH 7, 2007 DATE : MARCH 7, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant, the learned counsel for the respondents nos.2 to 11 and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is the original complainant in C.R.No. 62 of 2002 and he is accused in C.R.No.131 of 2002. C.R.No. 62 of 2002 relates to the proceedings bearing Sessions Case No.307 of 2002 and Sessions Case No. 392 of 2004. C.R.No.131 of 2002 relates to the proceedings bearing Case No. 809/P/2003 pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Railway Mobile Court at Andheri, [-2-] Mumbai. Respondent Nos.2 to 11 are the original accused in C.R.No. 62 of 2002 and Respondent No.2 is the original complainant in C.R.No.131 of 2002. In C.R.No.62 of 2002 there are four injured persons i.e. the applicant Virendra Ramashray Roy, and Balkrishna Sena Shetty, Rajesh Hanumant Gawda and Kushal Kale Gawda and in C.R.No. 131 of 2002 there are two injured persons i.e. respondent Nos.2 and 6. The applicant and Respondents have filed this application for quashing of the said two C.Rs. Counsel for the applicant and respondents have stated that these two C.Rs. are cross cases and parties have decided to settle the disputes amicably amongst themselves. In view of the amicable settlement, both the parties do not wish to proceed with their respective complaints. The affidavits of the injured persons in C.R.No. 62 of 2002 and C.R. No.131 of 2002 have been filed which are taken on record. They also state that they have settled the matter amicably and they have no objection to the said two C.Rs. being quashed. In view of the above amicable settlement between the parties and in view of the affidavits of the complainant and injured persons, I am of the opinion that in order to maintain amicable [-3-] relations between the parties, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the said two C.Rs.and the proceedings relating thereto. Hence, C.R.Nos. 62 of 2002 and 131 of 2002 and proceedings relating thereto are quashed. 3. Application is disposed of. [ V.K.Tahilramani, J.]