IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 15TH JANUARY 2008 / 25TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 34335 of 2007(K) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- V.P.ANIL KUMAR, RATHEESH BHAVAN, P.O.MAMBA, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT: --------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.M.R.SABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.34335 OF 2007-K APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT WITH ENDORSEMENT OF RENEWAL ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 04/10/2007 ISSUED BY THE R.T.A., KASARAGODE. / TRUE COPY / ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 34335 of 2007 ------------------------------------- Dated: January 15, 2008 JUDGMENT The prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the respondent to endorse Ext.P2 concurrence on Ext.P1 permit. Ext.P2 shows that concurrence was granted by the RTA without prejudice to the right of the RTA to decide the nature of the permit. 2. If concurrence has been granted and if there is a permit, there is no reason for not endorsing it. Accordingly, there will be a direction to endorse Ext.P2 concurrence on Ext.P1 permit as expeditiously as possible. This shall be done with notice to the parties who are likely to be affected by such decision. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-