1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPEALLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1150 OF 2009 Jayawant S. Tendulkar .. Petitioner Versus Narsinha R. Kulkarni .. Respondent Mr.Satyajeet Mirajkar for petitioner Mr.Sanjay Patil i/b. P.M.Pradhan for respondent CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 8th May 2009. P.C. . This petition is directed against an order passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Kagal on 2nd January 2008 below Exh.18 in Regular Darkhast No.50 of 2005. The said order directs issuance of warrant of attachment of the immovable property as, according to Court below, the Judgement Debtors have disobeyed the order of Injunction. It is not disputed before me that an application has been made praying that this order 2 be set aside. This application is made on 21st October 2008. The decree holder is yet to file a reply to this application. Even the main Darkhast is pending. 2. Interest of justice, therefore, would be sub-served if the Executing Court is directed to decide the application preferred by the petitioner, Judgement Debtor on 21st October 2008, as expeditiously as possible and within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Until the executing Court decides the application, the ad-interim order granted by this Court on 16th January 2009 to continue. All contentions of both sides are kept open. Petitioner is at liberty to raise all grounds which are taken in the present petition. Petition disposed of accordingly. 3 (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)