IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 16.09.2010 COCP No.2021 of 2009 (O&M) M/s Faqir Chand Amit Kumar and others ...Petitioner Versus R.R.Johal and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. R.K.Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Raman B. Garg, Advocate, for the respondents. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The grievance of the petitioners is that the respondents have made a wrong statement, when it was stated on 30.03.2007 that petitioner Nos.2, 5, 8, 12, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 32, 34 and 37 have already been accommodated in the New Anaj Mandi at Assandh. It is agreed that in fact some of the petitioners have shifted to New Anaj Mandi by constituting new firms as separate establishments. Therefore, the statement that the aforesaid petitioners have been accommodated in the New Anaj Mandi is not correct. On careful reading of the statement made before this Court on 30.03.2007, it is revealed that the petitioners are stated to be accommodated in the New Anaj Mandi. The statement is not that the aforesaid petitioners have been allotted plots in the New Anaj Mandi. Once the petitioners have withdrawn their writ petition in view of the statement made before this Court, it cannot be said that the respondents have made wrong statement. The disputed questions of fact regarding constitution of the firms or the COCP No.2021 of 2009 entitlements of the aforesaid petitioners for plots cannot be examined in a contempt petition. In view of the above, the present contempt petition is dismissed. However, it shall be open to the petitioners to establish their rights in appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. 16.09.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE 2