:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7124 OF 2006 Tukaram Dattu Kamble ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents Mr. A.Q. Ansari for petitioner. Mr. Y.D. Mulani, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 9 and 11. Mr. P.G. Karande for respondent no.10. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & J. H. BHATIA,JJ. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & J. H. BHATIA,JJ. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & J. H. BHATIA,JJ. Dated: December 14, 2006. Dated: December 14, 2006. Dated: December 14, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The petitioner is aggrieved by two different orders. The first order dated 16/3/2005 has been passed by the learned Judge, Co-operative Court No.4, Mumbai in Case No.CC-IV/358/2001 which was a dispute filed under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The second order by which the petitioner is aggrieved is dated 6/3/2006 passed by the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies in an Application filed under Section 35 of the said Act. . Undoubtedly, the first order is appealable before the Maharashtra Co-operative Appellate Court :2: and the second order is appealable under Section 152 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. It is well settled that when a statutory remedy of appeal is available, a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 need not be entertained. . The petition is, therefore, disposed with liberty to the petitioner to resort to the appeal remedy as per law. (J.H. Bhatia, J.) (J.H. Bhatia, J.) (J.H. Bhatia, J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)