IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 4192 of 2008. Decided on: 10.08.2010. __________________________________________________________ Savitri Devi. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondent No.1. Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. Mr. Ajeet Saklani, Advocate vice Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India for respondent No.4. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. V. S. Chauhan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3 submits that the petitioner has retired from service. This fact is refuted by Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, learned counsel for the petitioner in view of the age given by her as per affidavit filed while verifying the contents of the petition in the year 1996. 2. The petitioner has made a representation to the General Secretary, Child Welfare Board as per Annexure A-1, dated 1st July, 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 1994 for the redressal of her grievance. The same has not been decided till date. Consequently, in the interest of justice, the General Secretary, Child Welfare Board is directed to decide the representation by a speaking order, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this judgment. 3. In view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 10, 2010. (sck).