IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 830 of 2008 Bhagwati Prasad Kimothi …….. Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others ……Respondents Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Shri. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case submitted the chargesheet against the petitioner before the Circle Officer concerned on 26/10/2008 and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit chargesheet before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicated in para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 21.10.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the final report before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 05.12.2008 Shiv