1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Bail Application No.4977/2010 Shrayesh Kumar Pandey & ors Versus The State of Rajasthan 24.5.2010 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Vijay Poonia - for petitioners Mr Peeyush Kumar, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. It is stated that case for theft of laptop and money has not been found. Thus the case mainly remains under section 323 IPC which is bailable. Hence, petitioners may be given benefit of anticipatory bail more so when petitioners are students of B.Tech and their examinations are going on. On the other hand, learned PP has opposed the bail application. After taking into consideration rival submissions of 2 the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, but looking to the facts of this case, I am inclined to allow this bail application under Section 438 CrPC. Therefore, the SHO/IO of the Police Station – Sanganer, District - Jaiur is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner/s Shrayesh Kumar Pandey, Laxman Singh, Peeyush Kumar Pandey and Mahipal in FIR No. 308/2010 registered for offence under Section/s 143, 452, 323 and 379 IPC, he shall enlarge them on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i)They shall make themselves available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii)They shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii)They shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (iv)They shall not commit same and similar offence during the period of bail. (MN Bhandari), J. bnsharma