-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Revision Petition No.36 of 2010. Jagmohan son of late Shri Jagan Singh VERSUS Tota Singh son of late Shri Gude Singh and Others Date of Order :::: 16th April 2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Mr. Saransh Saini, Counsel for the Petitioner *** By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order passed by the learned Court below. The learned Court below has clearly held that in the facts and circumstances whether or not the land in dispute is an agricultural land and the suit is barred on account of the provisions of Section 207 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, is a mixed question of fact and law. In that view of the matter, the impugned order does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. It is a settled law that under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. all that Court has to see is whether or not the plaint suffers from any formal defect or the suit is barred by law on the face of it. -2- So far as the pleadings of the defendant in the application under Section 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. or any supporting evidence in support thereof is concerned, the same is to be examined at the appropriate stage and not at the stage of Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. Consequently, the revision petition, the stay application and the application under Order 41 Rule 27 C.P.C. are dismissed. (Dalip Singh), J. Ashok/