THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CRP No.4757 OF 2011 ORDER: This civil revision petition is filed against the order dated 8-09-2011 passed in RA No.337 of 2010 by the Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, confirming the order dated 23-8-2010 passed in RC No.194 of 2008 by the Principal Rent Controller, Secunderabad. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Perused the impugned order passed by the Courts below. 3. The petitioners herein are the respondents in RC No.194 of 2008 filed by the respondent herein who is the landlord of the premises in question. The respondent herein filed the RC against the petitioners herein on three grounds namely; willful default, acts of waste and bonafide personal requirement. The trial Court after recording the evidence found that the petitioners committed willful default in payment of rents, committed acts of waste and that the premises is required for the bonafide requirement of the landlord. The said finding of the trial Court was called in question by the petitioners herein in RA No.337 of 2010 before the lower appellate Court. By the impugned order, the lower appellate Court also confirmed the order of the trial Court and dismissed the appeal. 4. Both the Courts below on considering the oral and documentary evidence, on the grounds of bonafide requirement of the premises in question by the respondent and also willful default in payment of rents and acts of wastes committed by the petitioners herein, recorded concurrent findings. On facts nothing is pointed out to take a different view than the view taken by the Courts below. The contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners are in fact considered by the Courts below and held against them. 5. In the circumstances, the impugned order passed by the lower appellate Court below confirming the order of the trial Court does not warrant any interference by this Court. However, in view of the difficulty pleaded by the counsel in vacating the premises in question by the petitioners, six months time is granted from today to the petitioners to vacate the premises in question and handover the same to the respondent-landlord, subject to payment of agreed rents and giving an undertaking in the lower appellate Court. 6. In the result, the civil revision petition fails and it is accordingly dismissed, at the admission stage itself. __________________________ Ghulam Mohammed, J Dated: 25-11-2011 Note: cc by tomorrow. (b/o) Nrg