\J ial Date Order with Signature Office Note as to .Of•1er ofcOrder action (if any)takenonOrder • 2-8-ZOOiLl 7 -+,•.`'+ Upon hearing Mr. Tashi Wangdi Phempo, PresidentoftheSikkimacitizens'Forumrepresenting the petitioner and also Mr. S.P. Wangdi, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr. J.B. Pradhan and Mr. Karma Thinlay, learned Govt. Advocates at some length, Shri Tashi Wangdi Phempo in his usual frankness submitted that the petitioner desil.es to withdraw this` writ petition. Today, the learned AdvocateGenel.alattheveryoutsetcontendedthatih`'' terms of the dil.ectives of this Court made, on 9-9-2004 in Writ Petition ( C ) No.30 of2004, the respondent authority had duly complied with the directives of this Court and. passed the necessary orders thus, communicating the same to the petitioner. In support of this contention, the learl!ed Advocate General had drawn our attention to the document marked as in Annexure R-1 appended to the related affidavit filed by the respondent No.2, tlie Chief S6cietary, Government of Sikkim.Wehaveperused the document Annexure R-I which is a Govt. office letter dated 9-12-2004 showing the factum of communication of tlie I.elated decision of the authority concerned to the present writ petitioner in the year 2004. At the hearing, Mr. Tashi Wangdi Phempo contended that the offlce letter was not issued under the seal and signature of the Chief Secretary colicerned. A bare pel.usal of tlie office letter dated 9-12-2004 shows that the Joint Secretary, Serial Date Order with Signature Office Note as to No. of of action (if any) ` Order Order taken on Order +,,~ .` Home(II) has been directed by the appropriate autliority to inform the petitioner about the matter in terms of the related order passed by this Coul.t on 9-9- 2004 in the connected Writ Petition ( C ) No.30 of 2004. We are quite astound to know that the petitioner did not append a copy of this office letter dated 9-12-2004 to the writ petition though, the petitioner was quite aware or the existence of this t::n:;:p:e]t:t::°:Pert:;o::law:]St:t::;:a':S¥tah:#!#]ai;n:¥' the result, the petition is closed on withdrawal but, no order as to costs. A ^ N., (N. Surjamani ingh) Chief ]ustiee (IActing)(A.P.a) Judge