RSA No.69 of 2007 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.69 of 2007 Date of Decision: 14.7.2009 Ram Singh ......Appellant Versus Bahadur and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Robin Dutt, Advocate, for the appellant. Shri Ashok Khubbar, Advocate, for the respondents. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral). The plaintiff is in second appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below, whereby suit for possession by way of partition by metes and bounds was dismissed. It is the case of the plaintiff that the parties purchased property in dispute vide registered sale deed dated 31.12.1974. The plaintiff has 1/4th share in the said property. The plaintiff claimed partition of the aforesaid share through the present suit, which has been dismissed by the Courts below, holding that the plaintiff has admitted partition of the land more than 28 years ago. The learned first Appellate Court has given a firm finding of fact that the parties being co-owners mutually partitioned the property after RSA No.69 of 2007 (2) its purchase and that they have raised construction on their respective portions immediately thereafter. The said finding has been returned on the basis of the statements of DW1-Jai Pal; DW2-Bahadur Chand and DW3- Om Parkash and also on the basis of the statement of the plaintiff in his cross-examination. I do not find any patent illegality or material irregularity in the finding recorded or that the finding recorded gives rise to any substantial question of law in the present second appeal. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 14-07-2009 ds