CRM-M No. 32269 of 2011 **** Angrej Singh v. State of Punjab Present: Mr. D.S.Malwai, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sumeet Abrol, AAG, Punjab. **** This is a petition for regular bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 4 dated 04.02.2010, under Sections 307, 324, 323, 34 IPC, offence under Section 302 IPC added later on, registered at Police Station Ballianwali, Distt. Bathinda. On 31.10.2011 the following contention was noticed:- “Relies upon order dated 05.09.2011 passed in CRM-M No. 23845 of 2011 to contend that similarly situated co-accused was granted bail.” Learned AAG, on instructions from ASI Sukhdev Chander, has accepted this factual assertion that co-accused was granted bail as mentioned above but has argued that that co-accused had given less serious injuries than the petitioner. In that case what had prevailed with the learned Court was that a doctor had opined that the deceased was recovering well but died due to sudden cardiac arrest after taking some tablet. In this view of the matter the fact that the petitioner had given more serious injuries would be offset by the fact that he has now been in custody for 3 ½ months more than the co-accused. Consequently, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of bail to the CRM-M No. 32269 of 2011 -2- petitioner. Bail to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE December 14, 2011 sunita