\^v^ '"'Ui.C elpflWM b"1' nn. S 'S' %^1 3^ IN THE HIGH COUKtOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S)No. ^ ^ /2007(S.B.) PETITIONER : ^•••r-fiS^r ^ fes^F ^w*^-^^^ RESPONDENTS r^s>.. APARNA \% MA.WYA ! ,11 <^§ureshChaadra Pradhan S/o Shri Mukteshwar Pradhan '/^". . . ^. Aged about '44 years, Asst. Teacher, R/oVmage& Post- Sariya, Tah.-Sarangarh, Dist Raigarh-(C.G.) \^^- 3. /''' State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary School Education Departm.ent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Educatioa. Officer Raigarh, Dist : Raigarh-(C.G.) Block Education Officer Block - Raigarh District - Raigarli (C.G.) WRIT PETmON UWDER ARTICLE 226 QF THE CONSTITUTIONOF miAA ! tl*-- HI6H «3UR?TOF CHHATHS6ARH AT BILASS^M W. PfS) No.908of2a}7 Petitioner ; Sjresh OiondraProdhon Versus Itespondents : StateofChhat^isgarhondothers SB:t-(on1?|e Mr. Justice Satish K. Aynhotri. J Present: Mr.Vineet KumarPondey, Advoaate for •the petitioner. Mr.Ajay Dwivedi, Panel tawyer for the re^?ondents/5late. OROER (Passed 6n 1his 15"' bay of Februwy, 2007) 1; The petitioner wofic^pointedon 16.3.82 as Assistant Teacher on fixed pay scale of Rs. 150/-. After completion of two years prabation, he was granted regulap pay scale of Rs. 169-300/-. 2. Leamed counsel oppearing for the petitioner submits that the issue myolved in the case is asto whether the petitioner is entittee^-ta regular poy scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or after completionofprohationperiod. 3. TheiSsue involved, herein was considered by the MaAya Pradesh State Administrotive Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu cuid 56 otheps Vs. Stnte of M.P. & others), wherein it NWS held that the simitarly situated teacheFS are entitled to regukn' poy scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken-up to the 1-lbn'ble Supreme Court in Speeial Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. Thesaidpetition waS dismissedby •rtieHon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to -the effect •f7 'z^ that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are fentitled to reguhr pay Scale from date of initial appointment. 4. teamed counse.l appear'in9 for the petitioner furt+ier aibmits that this Court, while consjclering •ttie same issye in Aemon Jain Vs, The State Soverhment of Chhatt-isgarii & another C^/.P- No. 1463 of 2006) by orderdoited 10.11.2006, hasgranted regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of initialc^pointment. 5. Leamed counsel appearing for the parties jointly submitthat this case issquarely covered by the decisjon of this Gourt' m the case of Aeman Jqin Vs. The State Sovernment of Ghhatt'isgarh & another (Supra). Bablu 6. In view of thoit, this petition is disposed of in thesame terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge