IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44617 of 2010 RAUSHAN KUMAR @ RAJU KUMAR @ RAJU PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 27.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. but in course of investigation, the petitioner was arrested and confessed his guilt disclosing this fact that he had decided to finish Bablu Singh and Amit Mahto on the alleged date of occurrence. It would appear from perusal of impugned order of learned Additional Sessions judge-IV, Begusarai that in course of investigation, one witness, namely, Dilip Sahani at Paragraph-43 of the case diary discloses this fact that on the alleged date of occurrence, two persons had come at his orchard and took away Kudal from there. Apart from Paragraphs-43 and 90 of the case diary, none of the paragraphs has been mentioned by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. Therefore, considering the aforesaid facts circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, the petitioner, namely, Raushan Kumar @ Raju Kumar @ Raju Paswan is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like - 2 - amount each in connection with Cheriya Bariarpur P. S. Case No. 89 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)