IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No : 17870 of 2009 Between: P.Laxmi Prasanna and another. ..... PETITIONER AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. .....RESPONDENTS Order: The main grievance of the petitioners is that the respondents, especially respondent Nos.2 to 4 and their agents, are resorting to illegal and unconstitutional methods for recovery of the alleged arrears of loan amount obtained by them. When the matter came up for admission on 26.08.2009, while directing the learned Government Pleader for Home to get instructions in the matter, this Court granted interim directions. Thereafter, the matter underwent two adjournments. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, it is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4 that the respondents are not resorting to any illegal and unconstitutional methods for recovery of the arrears of loan amounts, especially after the judgment of the Supreme Court in ICICI Bank v. Prakash Kaur[1]. In view of the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel, no further orders need be passed in this writ petition. Accordingly, placing on record the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel, the writ petition is closed. Needless to mention, the respondents-Banks are at liberty to recover the arrears of loan amounts from the petitioners, if any, in accordance with law. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date:22.12.2009 VGB [1] 2007 (1) Decisions Today (SC) 265