IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 265 OF 2009 IN APPEAL UNDER ARBITRATION ACT NO. 15 OF 2009 MR. SADANNAND VAMAN SADEKAR ... Applicant Versus MANJU AVINASH WARDEKAR AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr.M.B. Da Costa, Senior Advocate. Mr. V. P. Thali,Advocate for Respondents. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 23rd November, 2010 P.C: Heard Mr. Da Costa, learned Senior Counsel for the the applicant and Mr. Thaly learned counsel for the respondents. Although by this application the applicant has claimed injunction against the respondents from disposing of or creating any third party rights or interest or creating any encumbrance on the movables and immovable of the firm, Mr. Da Costa states that the respondents be restrained from transferring immovable property belonging to the firm without obtaining leave of this Court since serious prejudice would be caused to the applicant in the event the respondents dispose of immovable assets of the firm. The prayer has been opposed by Mr. Thaly learned counsel appearing for the respondents. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered opinion that the prayer made on behalf of the applicant is reasonable and deserves to be granted. Accordingly, the respondents not to alienate or create any encumbrance in respect of immovable properties of the firm without seeking leave of this Court. The application stands disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ap/-