1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Company Appeal No.8/2009 in CAL No.19/2007 in CMP No.5/1997 [Sau. Aparna Arun Chalke .vrs. Official Liquidator] ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE AND P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 05, 2009. Heard Mr. K.R. Lambat, Advocate for the appellant and Mrs. S.S. Wandile, Advocate for the respondent. By this appeal the appellant takes exception of order dated 25.4.2008 passed by Company Judge dismissing the application filed by the applicant that the property which was attached pursuant to the order passed by Company Judge is owned by the appellant. Before the Company Judge the appellant produced revenue records as well as mortgage dated 30.4.2003 deed executed by the appellant and one Shankar Tembe in favour of the Bank. According to Mr. Lambat, the house was constructed from the money spent by the appellant when she was in service. Learned Company Judge held that the documents produced by the appellant did not prove title of the appellant 2 in respect of the property under attachment. According to Mr. Lambat, the learned Company Judge has not considered the materials on record and has rejected the application by not appreciating that the appellant has produced materials in supporting her title to the property under attachment. Having heard the leaned counsel for the appellant and the respondent, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. The finding given by the Company Judge that the documents did not prove title of the appellant in respect of the property under attachment cannot be said to be either illegal or perverse warranting any interference by this Court. Needless to mention that the appellant is at liberty to avail any other remedy as may be available to her in law. The appeal stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande