... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2411 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2411 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2411 OF 2004 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri U.G.Deshpande for the Applicants. Shri Dinesh Bhosale for the Respondent No.2. Mrs M.M.Deshmukh, A.P.P for the State. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : DECEMBER 22, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 22, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 22, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicants and the learned Advocate for the second Respondent. Heard the learned A.P.P for the State. The consent terms have been filed signed by the Applicants, second Respondent and their respective Advocates. Consent terms are marked ‘X’ for identification. Consent terms are already taken on record on 20th December, 2006. I have perused the affidavit of the second Respondent as well as affidavit of the first Applicant. I have perused the certified copy of the complaint which shows that name of the second complainant is already ... 2 ... deleted. 2. Undertakings of the parties recorded in clause Nos.1 and 2 of the consent terms are accepted. In view of the settlement, Application is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE