1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.120 OF 2006 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.35 OF 2005 Uttara Milind Chavan ..Applicant V/s. Milind Anant Chavan ..Respondent Ms.V.V.Thorat for the applicant. Mr.Tanaji Mhatgude i/by Mr.V.V.Bakre Shastri for the respondent. CORAM : R.M. LODHA & A.S.BAGGA, JJ. DATED : 20TH JUNE, 2006. P.C. We put two queries to the advocate for the applicant; (i) whether there is any order of the court restraining the applicant from removing the two children Apoorva and Achintya from the jurisdiction of this court and (ii) whether the respondent has been granted any visiting rights in respect of the two children. To both the questions, answer of the advocate for the applicant was in negative. 2. If that be so, we fail to appreciate the necessity of such application. The application is misconceived and the order of the court is not at all necessary. 3. Civil application is, accordingly, rejected. (R.M.LODHA, J.) 2 (A.S.BAGGA, J.)