IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 15TH JANUARY 2009 / 25TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 31930 of 2008(A) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- SURAJ S/O. VAZHAPULLY SOMAN, VALAPPAD VILLAGE, KAZHIMBRAM DESOM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.N.MANOJ RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR THRISSUR. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER OFFICE OF THE RDO THRISSUR. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER NATTIKA VILLAGE OFFICE, NATTIKA POST, THRISSUR DISTRICT 4. THE TAHSILDAR CHAVAKKAD TALUK, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.R.SREELATHA FOR R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/01/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.31930/08 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE DEED OF SALE NO.2243/2006 DT 17/10/2006. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE DEED OF SALE NO.2244/2006 DT 17/10/2006. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P4: APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY DT 31.10.2008. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATE DT 17/8/2007. EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF THE ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATE DT 17/8/2007. EXT.P7(a): TRUE COPY OF THE ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATE DT 17.8.2007. EXT.P7(b): TRUE COPY OF THE ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATE DT 17.8.2007. EXT.P7(c): TTUE COPY OF THE ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATE DT 17.8.2007. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 31930 OF 2008 (A) ==================== Dated this the 15th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that by Exts.P1 and P2, he acquired title over the property having an extent of 32.5 cents comprised in resurvey No.162/3 and 4 of Nattika Village. According to the petitioner, the property was under attachment and after discharging the liabilities, he got the attachments also lifted. Despite that, when he applied for effecting mutation on the strength of Exts.P1 and P2, that was declined by Ext.P3 order passed by the 4th respondent. Thereupon, the petitioner filed Ext.P4 appeal before the 2nd respondent. 2. In this writ petition although correctness of Ext.P3 itself is called in question, having regard to the fact that Ext.P4 appeal filed by the petitioner is pending consideration of the 2nd respondent, I dispose of this writ petition directing the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P4 appeal, with notice to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 4 weeks of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp