CLCON No.81 of 2008 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Hem Chandra Joshi, the learned counsel for the applicant. Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, the learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Arvind Vashisht, the learned counsel for the respondents. The writ court, by an order dated 22.05.2007, directed the competent authority to take a decision on the representation of the petitioner. Since the same was not done, the present contempt application has been filed. In the representation various grievances were raised and one of the grievances is with regard to the leave encashment. The respondents in their counter affidavit have stated that the applicant was informed by a letter dated 14.08.2007 that he was required to approach the office in order to avail his leave encashment. It transpires that by the said order dated 14.08.2007, the petitioner was asked to vacate the government accommodation and, thereafter, collect his dues from the office. Since the petitioner continues to occupy the government accommodation, the leave encashment is not being released. In my opinion, no willful disobedience is made out by the opposite parties. The contempt application is accordingly dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 18.09.2010 LSR