IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1231 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 803 OF 2009 (MOHANDAS POCHAM SOYAM.. VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTH.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Shri Harshal Bobde, Advocate for Applicant. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 13, 2009. 1. Heard. 2. Accepting the reasons assigned in the application towards absence of the applicant’s Advocate on 28.07.2009, when the writ petition was dismissed, which are good and sufficient, the application is allowed. Writ Petition No. 803 of 2009 is restored to file. JUDGE JUDGE RR. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 803 OF 2009 (MOHANDAS POCHAM SOYAM.. VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTH.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Shri Harshal Bobde, Advocate for Applicant. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 13, 2009. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner claims that he prays for relief that direction be given to respondent No.6 Headmaster to allow the petitioner to join duty as Cook in respondent No.6 School. What is in the mind of the petitioner cannot be speculated. He may be treating it to be the case of oral termination or simple refusal to sign the muster roll. In any event, his remedy is not recourse to writ jurisdiction. 3. The petition is disposed of in the light of alternate remedy available to the petitioner. 4. The time lost and spent in pursuing present petition will not come in the way of the petitioner, if appropriate remedy is resorted to by the petitioner. JUDGE JUDGE RR.