HiOH COURT OF CHHATTISSARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 2024 of 2008 Petitionerc; 8) 9) 1) A.K. Pandey, E®edabout 52 years, son of Late C.B. Pandey, working as Rura! Agricuiturs Extension Officer, Kawardha, Distt. Kabeerdham, (CG). 2) Tarun Kumar Deei^n, son of B.P. Deewari, agsd about 49 years, presently worksng as Rural Agricutture Exlension Officer, Biock Kawardha, Distt. Kabeerdham (CG). 3) R.S. Dubey, aged about 52 years, sen of Shri S.P. Dubey, working as Rural Agricuiture Extension Officer, Block Beria, Distt. Durg (CG). 4) R.K. Gupta, son of Shri Ramachandra Gupta, aged about 52 years presendy working as Rurai /^ricuiture Extension Offieer, Block Beria.Dtett. Durg (CG). 5) R.K. Agrawai, son of Shri Kishan Agrawai, aged about 48 years, presentiy working as Rural Agriculture Extension Officer, Biock Berdia Distt. Durg (CG). 6) Om Prakash Tiwari, aged about 82 years, son of Shri Ramdeo Thsari, Rura! ^riculture Extension Officer, Block Kharsia, Dist. Raigarh (CG). 7) B.B. Chaudhari, aged about 48 years, son of Shri Banwari Lat Chaudhari, Rural Agrieulture Extension Officer, Block Bodia, Distt. i^beerdham (CG). R.A. Sharma, son of Shri R.C. Sharka, aged about 49 years, working as Senior Agricuiture Eidension Officsr, Pendra Road, in the Qffice of Sub Dhrisional officer, Agricuiture, Pendra Road, Buaspur (CG). Ravindra Purohit, son of Shri R.P. Purohit, aged about 37 years, presentiy woridng as Draftsman, under the ofRce of Assistant Saii Conservation Officer, Kawardha, Distt. Kabeerdham (CG). Rajendra Kumar Yadav, aged about 43 years son of Late Shri babuia! Yadav, prssenfly working as Rurai Agriculture Extension Officer, Block Gurur, Distt. Durg (CG). -2W &-uy,li'<tvec o lb He'itf^e, C&ttf^-^ o-^aA- c/rf-. ^sr/.tt/eS pa^wi JT, ^,Q~ ^lo. 'l^lt^, ^•Tneficlvnenl ^vjws-^e-sTi/es/ ^-r, -f^i ccu.u.e. •ftflSs—-, ^Q (^ Sd/- A.R (J) Respondents 11) Sudarshan Pd. Gaur, son of Late Shri Mahanlal Gaur, aged about 49 years, presently working as Rurai ^iricuHure Extension Officer, B!ock Gurur, Dist. Durg (CG). 12) Prakash Dubey, son of Late Shri Prem Narayan Dubey, aged about 46 years, presentiy working as Rural Agricuiture Extension Qfficer, Btock Gurur, Distt. Durg i ff^f^\ ^'\s<r'^vftm(i^Aa&.^»<*i-.s'o-Mi£<'&^:»v;<^- 'SKS ^'^^'Rfc»,<:>/Ahj£n;,-&lot*.i(?t<'>laN^) .aa.^ai^, 'RalpiS^ <£<•? 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Ghief Secretary, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2) State of Madhya Pradesh, through the Chief Secrstary, Government of Madhya Pradesh, 3) The Director (Agricutture), State of Chhattisgarh, Lophandi Raipur (CG). 4) The Director (Agriculture) State of M.P. Vindyachat Bhawan, Bhopal (MP). 5) Union of india through Ministry of Personnei, Public Grievances and Penston Department. of Personnei and Training Khan Market, New Deihi. (Writ Petition Article under Articte 226 of the Constitution of India ) SB: Hon'bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Smt. Pushpa Dwivedi, counset for th®petittoners. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Govt. Advocate for the State. Shri R.S. Baghei, counsel for Unton of India. (Passedon 7-4-2008} With consent of learned counsei for the parties, the matter is heard 2) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that she does not want to press this petition on merit, except that the pertitioners be permitted to make a representation to the Committee in the tight of the judgment and order .-iii.BB:..-.. dated 17th Apri!, 20)7 passed bythis Court in B.R. Godbote Vs. Municipat Corporation Durg, and others ( 2007 (2) COU 417), to which iearned counsel appearing for the respondents/State has no objection. 3) Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e., the Committee so constituted is directed to consider the r^resentations made by the petitioners, if their representations are nottonsidered eariier. !n the event, if their representations are not considered earlier, the fresh representations may be considered, as expeditaousiy as possible within-a oeriod of four months from the date of receiot of the'reDresentations. The representations may be considered keeping in mind the fact of residence and posting of the employee in one State and posting of the spouse in other State. This exercise on the part of Uie Government <rf India may be compteted wtthin a period of four months from ths date of receipt of a copy of this order. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Raju