IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18865 of 2009 Mani Lal Ram son of late Ayodhi Ram Resident of village-Nathpur, P.S.Narpatganj,District Araria ………………Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar……………..Opposite party ----------- 3 13.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case for the offence punishable under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that earlier he was granted bail. However, his bail bond was cancelled subsequently on the date fixed as he did not appear in the case. It is submitted that the petitioner could not be physically present and his petition under Section 317 Cr.P.C. was rejected. Thereafter, the petitioner was not informed by his Pairvikar. It is further submitted that the petitioner is a poor person and had gone outside to earn his livelihood. Besides, the merit of the case is that the petitioner has completed the work assigned to him. Learned counsel for the petitioner assures the Court that the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date of his trial in the court below, save and except for any cogent reason. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioner, namely, Mani Lal Ram is directed to be released on 2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in connection with Narpatganj P.S.Case No.198/1995. SKBOSE (Shailesh Kumar Sinha)