In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... C.W.P. No.11250 of 2009 ..... Date of decision:29.7.2009 Uco Bank .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents .... Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta KKR, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... S.S. Saron, J. This writ petition has been filed for directing respondents No.1 to 3 to mark lien in the revenue record against residential house situated in Ward No.11, Sector 14, Guru Teg Bahadur Nagar, Kharar in respect of land measuring 5 Marlas comprised in Khata No. as detailed in the head note of the petition being the residential house owned by Gurvinder Singh (respondent No.4). Gurvinder Singh (respondent No.4) had approached the petitioner-Bank for availing housing loan for purchase of house. In order to secure the loan an equitable mortgage by deposit of title deed of House No.11, Sector 14, Guru Teg Bahadur Nagar, Kharar was created. The details of the house are mentioned in the head note of the petition. The petitioner-Bank advanced a sum of Rs.13 Lacs to Gurvinder Singh (respondent No.4) on 2.7.2008 as housing loan. On disbursement of the loan amount to the vendor a sale deed was executed and registered in the office of Sub-Registrar, Kharar on 3.7.2008 in favour of Gurvinder Singh C.W.P. No.11250 of 2009 [2] (respondent No.4). The registered sale deed has been kept in the custody of the petitioner-Bank and the said property of respondent No.4 stands under equitable mortgage with the petitioner-Bank. Mutation of the purchase made by respondent No.4 has been sanctioned in his name. The grievance of the petitioner is that its lien is not being marked in the revenue record in its favour despite making requests in this regard. A similar writ petition i.e. Uco Bank v. State of Punjab, CWP No.6821 of 2009 came up before this Court and it was disposed of on 5.5.2009 with the direction to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of the order. Besides, while deciding the prayer of the petitioner, the respondents, it was observed, would keep in view the law laid down by this Court in Narvir Singh and another v. State of Haryana and others, 2008 (1) PLR 593. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. The respondents No.1 to 3 shall consider the case of the petitioner Bank for entering its lien in the revenue record in accordance with law and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order and while deciding the case the law laid down by this Court in Narvir Singh's case (supra) shall be kept in view. July 29, 2009. (S.S. Saron) Judge *hsp* NOTE: Whether to be referred to the Reporter or not:Yes/No