IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5733 of 2010 NIKKU OJHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.02.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner in a Police case originally instituted under Sections 307, 324 of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act to which Sections 302,201,120B IPC was added is that one of the assailant is named as Anup Choubey while the other is named as resident of Village Panan when the petitioner is resident of Village Ami Ojha. The later part names the petitioner as an accomplice of Anup Choubey yet does not disclose his name as one of the participant during the occurrence. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of F.T.C. 3rd Gopalganj in Sessions Trial No. 72 of 2009 arising out of Kateya PS Case No. 51 of 1998. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)