gopi 1 review pet.129-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.129 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.797 OF 2011 Radiological & Imaging Association ..Petitioners V/s. Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents. Ms. Anita Bhaktwani for petitioners. Mr. Amit B. Borkar for respondent No.3. Mr. V.D. Patil, G.P. for respondent No.2. CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J., & MRS. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED : 29 November 2011. P.C. Two grounds are urged for reviewing our judgment dated 26 August 2011. 2. The first ground is that the submission of “F” Form on-line should be only through Government website and not through a private website. 3. We have not dealt with the issue of website being Government website or private website. The petitioners will be at liberty to raise this issue with the respondent-authorities and we may gopi 2 review pet.129-11 not be treated to have expressed any opinion on the same. If such a representation is made by the petitioners regarding the submission of “F” Form on-line through the Government website, the Government authorities will consider the same expeditiously. However, till the Government accepts the petitioners’ representation that the submission of “F” Form on-line should be to the Government website, the direction to submit the “F” Form on-line to another website is not to be disobeyed. 4. The second ground urged is that while the Collector may view sonography images of preganant women from the images stored in the silent observer, the Collector will also have access to the sonography images of other patients and it would amount to breach of their privacy rights. 5. Having regard to the fact that sonography images stored in the silent observer will be accessible only to the appropriate authority or his representative not below the rank of Deputy Collector and the medical personnel of public hospitals referred to in our judgment, it is clear that the public at large will not be having any access to any such sonography images either of pregnant women or of other patients. Therefore also, we find no merit in this Review Petition. 6. However, it will be open to all concerned to evolve appropriate technology in such a manner that the numbers may be given on “F” Form submitted online and then the images in the silent observer/active tracker can be synchronized. Of course, till such technological break through is achieved, there will be no justification not to carry out the instructions which may be given by the appropriate gopi 3 review pet.129-11 authority to instal silent observer/active tracker. 7. Review Petition is accordingly dismissed. (CHIEF JUSTICE) ( MRS. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA J.)