IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 1ST JANUARY 2008 / 11TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 36719 of 2007(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------- T.P. ANTU, S/O. PAPPU, AGED 34 YEARS, THONDUNGAL HOUSE, KARIPPASSERY, VATTAPARAMBU P.O., PARAKKADAVU VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.S.SUDHISH KUMAR SRI.K.B.DAYAL RESPONDENTS: ---------------- 1. PARAKKADAVU GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KURUMASSERY P.O. 2. JOSE, S/O. THOMMAN, AGED 44 YEARS, IRUMPAN HOUSE, PARAKKADAVU P.O., POOVATHUSSERY. R1 BY ADV. SRI.S.GOPINATHAN, SC. SRI.JOHNSON ABRAHAM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/01/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 36719 OF 2007 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the petitioner draws my attention to Ext.P8 and submits that it will suffice if the Panchayat implements Ext.P8 favourably. Learned counsel for the Panchayat submits that Ext.P8 has been kept in abeyance by the District Collector and that the same is in view of the pendency of this Writ Petition. Whatever that be, considering Ext.P8 I am of the view that, it is not necessary to examine the merits of the grounds raised. The Writ Petition will stand disposed of directing the Panchayat to implement Ext.P8. If the Panchayat has any grievance about Ext.P8, it is open to the Panchayat to seek redressal of that grievance through appropriate fora. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE btt WPC 2