IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2011 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 569 of 2011(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S) : --------------------- NIKHIL K., S/O.KARTHIKEYAN, AGED 24 YEARS, NIKHIL BHAVANAM, KARUVATTA NORTH P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT., PIN – 690 554. BY ADV. SRI.ARUN CHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S) : ------------------------ 1. RAJENDRAN, LAKSHMIPURAM, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT KARUKATHARAYIL, KANICHANALLUR, MUTTOM P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT – 690 511. 2. VIJAYAN, KARUKATHARAYIL, KANICHANALLUR, MUTTOM P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT – 690 511. 3. THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, ALAPPUZHA – 688 001. THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AMV WPCR NO.569 OF 2011 (S) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS : NIL RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE AMV THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ---------------------------------------- W.P(Crl).No.569 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. After arguing the matter for quite some time and after we indicated that if necessary, we would consider the request for appointing an Advocate Commissioner also on condition that if the petitioner were to fail in the writ petition, he would have to pay costs, learned counsel for the petitioner, in further consultation with his client, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. The writ petition is hence dismissed as withdrawn. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN Judge C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge kkb.14/11.