: 1 : FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CONTEMPT PETITION NO.277 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s . orders or directions and . Registrar’s orders . -------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Mangesh Patil for the Petitioner. Mr.G.W Mattos, AGP for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 13TH OCTOBER, 2008. P.C. : 1. Although the order was passed by Respondent No.1 on 18.7.2007, it appears that it remained to be served upon the Petitioner. It was served on all other parties. The order is in favour of the Petitioner. 2. Mr.Patil, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that the order was deliberately not served on the Petitioner for obvious reason. : 2 : 3. I will presume on this occasion that there was no intention on the part of the Respondents to delay furnishing of the order to the Petitioner. The order dated 18.7.2007 has now been complied with although the communication of the order passed pursuant thereto was delayed. 4. For the reasons stated above, no further action for contempt is called for. The Contempt Petition is accordingly disposed of.