IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No. M-15875 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 31.05.2011 Umed and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present:- Mr. Madan Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Satyavir Singh Yadav, DAG, Haryana for the respondent-State. Respondent No. 2 in person with Mr. N.K.Malhotra, Advocate. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) By filing this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners seek quashing of First Information Report (for short 'FIR) No. 87 dated April 8th, 2000 (Annexure P-1), under Sections 323 and 325 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC'), Police Station Sadar, Rohtak on the basis of compromise (Annexure P/2) entered into between the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have compromised the matter with the intervention of respectables. They belong to same family. Compromise-deed (Annexure P-2) has been placed on record. There is no ill-will left and they want to live in peace and harmony in future. Respondent No.2 has no objection if the aforesaid FIR and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed. Criminal Misc. No. M-15875 of 2011 -2- .. 3. In view of above, petition is accepted. Consequently, FIR No. 87 dated April 8th, 2000 (Annexure P-1), under Sections 323 and 325 read with Section 34 IPC, Police Station Sadar, Rohtak and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 31.05.2011 som