1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2529 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3730 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3731 OF 2008 (Nitin Bhaurao Tidke .v. Ruprao Indrabhanji Tidke and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri V.G. Bhamburkar, Advocate for the applicant. Shri N.A. Vyawahare, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Shri M.J. Khan, APP for respondent No.4/State. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. 05TH OCTOBER, 2010. Heard. This is application for restoration. This Court, vide order dated 13th March, 2009 granted time to the applicant to furnish the copies of roznamas so as to show his bona fides in view of the statement made in the application for condonation of delay that the applicant was engaged in the court proceedings and as such he was unable to file the same. In spite of the time granted to the applicant, no compliance was made. The applicant was not present in the Court on 08th May, 2009. Though the applicant was not present, this Court, by giving one more opportunity being last opportunity to the applicant, granted time to place on record the copies of roznamas on or before 9th June, 2009 and it was made clear in the order that if the compliance is not made, the application shall stand dismissed without reference to the Court. The compliance was not made on 09th June, 2009. As such, the application was dismissed. Today, Shri V.G. Bhamburkar, the learned Counsel for the applicant, in spite of asking by this Court on which date the relevant documents will be made available, he was not in a position to give me the date on which the documents will be made 2 available. Reply has been filed by the respondents. It is submitted in the reply that the application is neither supported with the material nor it is filed under the provisions of law. It is clear that in spite of granting the opportunities, the applicant failed to make the compliance till 09th June, 2009. Even today the so called copies of roznamas are not made available for bare perusal. No case is made out to show any indulgence by this Court. In the result, the application is rejected. JUDGE *rrg.