IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2509 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 2509 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 2509 OF 2005 Kishan U. Parwani. ... Petitioner. V/s. Dr.T.Chandrashekhar, Addl.Metropolitan Commissioner, Project Director, Mumbai Urban Transport Project-II & others. ... Respondents. Hitesh Vyas i/b. Poonam Bhosale for the petitioner. Amjad Sayyed, AGP for the State. CORAL: CORAL: CORAL: F.I.REBELLO AND ANOOP MOHTA. JJ. F.I.REBELLO AND ANOOP MOHTA. JJ. F.I.REBELLO AND ANOOP MOHTA. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : : : 17th November 2006. 17th November 2006. 17th November 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : ---- ---- ---- . Rule. . Heard forthwith. 2. The only grievance in the petition is that the representations made by the petitioner, as reflected in prayer clause (a), have not been considered. Considering the limited nature of relief sought, we direct respondent Nos.3 and 4 to consider the representations, if maintainable, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Entire exercise to be completed within two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order by respondent Nos.3 and 4. 3. Petition is disposed of in terms of this order. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP MOHTA, J.) MOHTA, J.) MOHTA, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.)