THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU W.P.NO.16240 OF 2009 ORDER This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the 1st and 2nd respondents to take action against the 3rd respondent prohibiting him from violating 483, 484, 485, 487 and 490 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 by permitting the perilous continuation of garbage dump and declare that the action of the respondents as illegal, arbitrary. It is the case of the petitioners that they are individual owners and separate possessors of residential property bearing Municipal No.1-8-144, Prendergast Road, Secunderabad and they were allotted separate bye numbers. The 3rd respondent, who is operating a marriage hall, made a place to dump garbage emerging out of conducting functions beside the entrance leading into the property in question beside the transformer abutting the portion of 3rd petitioner. Heavy vehicles are also parked blocking their passage for hours together to unload the utensils, vegetables etc., and causing inconvenience to the petitioners. Further, the 3rd respondent has constructed a room for garbage dumping as the petitioners complained to the official respondents about scattering of garbage in the parking area meant for them and that every alternative day heap of polythene bags containing garbage is stored in that room expecting the 2nd respondent to carry it to municipal dumping yard. However, the official respondents are taking their own time to clean it up and stated that since it is a private place they are not obligated to clean it up every day. Since garbage is getting rottener to the core and is emanating obnoxious foul smell out of it, the present writ petition is filed. When the writ petition came up for consideration, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC appearing on behalf of the 1st and 2nd respondents states that the 1st and 2nd respondents will take appropriate decision on the representation being made by the petitioners. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are directed to make a representation to the 1st and 2nd respondents. On such representation being made by the petitioners, the 1st and 2nd respondents shall take appropriate decision in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _____________ K.C.BHANU,J rkk Dated: 22-11-2011