C.W.P No. 6529 of 2005 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No. 6529 of 2005 Date of decision : May 25, 2009 Bal Kishan, ...... Petitioner (s) v. State of Haryana and others, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Vir Bhan, Advocate for Mr. D.S.Nirban, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG Haryana for the respondens. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petitioner claims appointment to the post of J.B.T Teacher by way of this writ petition. The primary contention is that the petitioner had successfully completed the Unit Education Instructors Course at Army Educational Corps Training College and Centre, Pachmari and that this Course is recognized as equivalent to JBT Course by the Government of Haryana and also by the Government of Madhya Pradesh. In the written statement filed by respondent No.1, a preliminary C.W.P No. 6529 of 2005 ::2:: objection has been taken that in a similar case viz Azad Singh and others vs State of Haryana and others, CWP No.8882 of 1997 decided on 8.7.1997, wherein also the petitioner therein was an Ex. Army personnel having qualification of Unit Education Instructor Course, a Division Bench of this Court held as follows :- “ In view of the above discussion, we hold that the petitioners are not entitled to be considered for recruitment as JBT teachers and the decision of the respondent Board does not suffer from any error of law.” Counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to deny commonality between these two cases. He has not been able to show that the above judgment has been set aside or reversed subsequently. In view of this binding precedent, this writ petitionis dismissed with, however, no order as to costs. ( AJAY TEWARI ) May 25, 2009. JUDGE `kk'