C.W.P. No.20011 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.20011 of 2010 Date of Decision: 10.11.2010 Jaspal Dhingra ……Petitioner VERSUS The State of Punjab and others ……Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI -.- Present: Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) Learned Counsel for the petitioner argues that the main reason why the petitioner has been non-suited was because he never appeared before the authorities and that fact as per the learned Financial Commissioner cast a doubt on the entire case set up by the petitioner. In the petition it has further been undertaken that the petitioner would appear as and when required. He has further argued that otherwise the petitioner had paid the entire dues C.W.P. No.20011 of 2010 -2- in the year 1974 and had also been allotted a plot which is still lying unallotted. In these circumstances in my opinion, it would be appropriate if liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a review petition before the respondent No.1 and present himself before the respondent No.1 so that in case the respondent No.1 is convinced about bona fides of the case of the petitioner suitable order can be passed. With this liberty, this petition is disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) November 10, 2010 JUDGE ashish