THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.R.P. No. 5532 of 2010 O r d e r: This C.R.P. is directed against the order dated 04.08.2010, passed by the VII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, dismissing the application in I.A. No. 525 of 2009 in O.S. No. 7 of 2008, filed by the petitioners praying to implead respondent Nos. 3 and 4, namely the District Registrars of Hyderabad and Ranga Reddy as defendant Nos. 3 and 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the order under revision. The petitioners are the plaintiffs. They filed suit for declaration of title, recovery of possession and cancellation of registered sale deed No. 1550/65. Respondent No.1-defendant No.1 resisted the suit, while respondent No.2-defendant No.2 remained ex parte. The dispute involved in the suit, is purely between the petitioners and respondent No.1. Respondent Nos. 3 and 4, whom the petitioners seek to implead as defendant Nos. 3 and 4 to the suit are public officials, discharging their duties under the Registration Act, 1908. They have no right or interest in the suit property either directly or indirectly. Merely because respondent Nos. 3 and 4, in the discharge of their official functions, registered sale deed No. 1550/65 and G.P.A. No.6478/2002, is no ground for the petitioners to implead them as defendant Nos. 3 and 4, particularly when the rights of the parties involved in the suit, can be effectively resolved even without the presence of respondent Nos. 3 and 4. If according to the petitioners, the sale deed No. 1550/65 is not genuine, they can prove the same by adducing evidence, but certainly not by impleading respondent Nos. 3 and 4, who are public officials and having nothing to do with the suit property. For the foregoing reasons, I find no reason whatsoever to interfere with the order under revision, passed by the Court below, refusing to implead respondent Nos. 3 and 4 as defendant Nos. 3 and 4 in the suit, in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The C.R.P. is devoid of merit, and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 14th December, 2010 KSR