/ c ^•\^{ BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAPSUR (C.G.} W.P. No. l 6 L5' /2004 Petitioner .<0$^ ^i>^y <^M^-"* \y~[^/)l\ ...-•'<^^ ^p'.,. \^/: ^\<^' -' »<»-. •^y' < Chandra Shekhar Singh Thakiir, S/o Shri Janardan Singh, aged about 43 years, Upper Division Teacher (Sc'ence). Govt. Higher Secondary School; village : Jadootola, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS Respondents 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. ^s^^: t.wfcto /Q. SWaspu' y.^Q- \ -,!. .'^.'^ ; ff *^y /? • s" ^ .f'^'t ^ 2. ^ 3. Through : Principle Secretary, Schedule Tribe Development Department, Govt. of C.G., Mantralaya, D.K. Bhawan, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner/Director, Tribal Welfare Department, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, D.K. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe, Back-ward class aad Minority Community Welfare Department, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) <^_^c-^ -2- 4. ^ ^ ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, Scheduled Tribes Development, Govt of Chhattisgarh, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 5. SHRI ANIL KUMAR PANDHRE (Science* Assistant Teacher) Upper Division Teacher *• . Govt. High School, Khadgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ""^sas^'x^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No, 1615 of 2004 Petitioner Chaadra Shekhar Sin.gh Thakur .Versus Respondents State of CUiatdsgarh & otfaers gg^'K.-''--'""^^ 8) ^..^^sg^y ^^ysr" (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 offhe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) s* Sbri V. G. Tamaskar, Advocate for tbe petitioner. Ms Snnita Jain, Paael Lawyer for fhe respondents No. 1 to 4 0^l^E_RJora!l ( Passed on this 18th day ofSeptember, 2009) 1. 2. 3. 4. Thakur Heard. By oider dated 18.6.2003 fhe petitioner was promoted from fhe post of Assistant Teacher to the post of Upper Division Teacher. The challenge iu this petition is to the order dated 25.7.2003 (Annexure P/3), whereby the order dated 18.6.2003 was stayed. Leamed counsel appearmg for the respondents/State on fhe basis of the retum dated 3.9.2009 submits fhat, ftie order dated 18.6.2003, by which fhe petitioner was promoted froiu. fhe post of AssKtant Teacher to the post of Upper Division Teacher, has been canceUed vide order dated 7.2.2006 (Armexure R/l). Thus, ia absence of the challenge to the subsequent order dated 7.2.2006, this petition has becoiue iaiructuous. Learaed coiinsel appearfng for the petitioner does not controvert fhe above subiuissions made by leamed counsel appearmg for Uie respondents/State, Jn view of tbe above, fhe petition is dismissed, as haying becorae uifructuous. No order as to costs. Sd/- satish K. Agnihotri Judge