^^/^-1^5- IN THE HIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) W.P.fS) No. ^Gf^ 1300^ ^^W PETITIONER ^^^-_ r^^-^k' ^ ^:.^ '?^s' Stf^ "Ai ^. / / Manohar Lal Patel, aged about 42 years, S/o- Bhawgrahi Patel, Lecturer, Posted at Shri Rameshwar Gahira Guru Higher Secondary School, Shrikot, Block- Kusmi, District- Surguja (C.G.), R/o-Village & Post- Katahardi, Block &. District- Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ •^K^ t.% r^.^..:-'.^&i ^ @ 'y Stateof Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Tribal depart:ment, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development Department, Surguja, District- Surguja (C.G.) The Principal, Shri Rameshwar Gahira Guru Higher Secondary School, Shrikot, Block- Kusmi, District- Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITIONUNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^^^-^^^ ^' ^ya:s€ / ^ ^ y^ ^^? ^M <tl^. "^^ :-HC—78 ^n^i^Tf^w ^^? W^T ^frii^ Nl<4?11 WRT<^ '3^ ^i^|<rt<4, ^Tt^R^, fsidiyy ...u...£:..c»?^....eA.:.%^fe 200 ^n^i 'q^r (^i^^) I^TW^ftcl 3?T^I §B: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICB PRItINKBR DIWAKKR 1W:l?^rf^T "RTR^ff ^f fe^ iPsl^K ^ 3tfw w^r 01.10.2010 Shri P.S.Khare, coiinselt<| Shri Praveen Das, Dy. G./| Counsel for the petitionej entitled to benefiLt of two advaoi haviag passed B.Ed, examiaaticj petition is no longer re^ integrc^ r fhe petitioner. „ for the State. r submits fhat the petitioner is ^e uicrenients on account of he >n before his appomitmeiit at his own cost. It is subniitted that t|ie issue iavolved ia the present and fhe saxae has been finally decided by fhe Honl3le Supre|iie Court in. fhe case of Aslia Saxena Vs. State ofM.P. & Or^. 2009 (III^MPJR (8C) 39. It is further submitted similar view ia its order dated 6257/2008. Counsel for the order dated 29.4.2010 passed whereia relyiag upon the judgiu case ofAsha Saxena (supra) in aaother Writ Appeal No. issued for consideration of tfael iacreinents as per circular date| of Madhya Pradesh, after verific petition. tilat pe^itioner aafl this C/ourt has also taken a 16.2.2009 passed m W.P.(8) No. further siibmite that the jin Writ Appeal N0. 124/2009, ^ent of the Suprexne Court ia fhe fhe order passed by ftiis Court $7/2009, directions have been case for grant of two advance :ji 21.9.1974 issued by tlie State {ation of the facts pleaded in the Counsel for the State su^mits that case of fhe petitiotier would also be considered on th4 same Unes, -^ XI-HC—78 N1*4^11 W»NI^» ^ST <<ll^t<yl'4, ^•<ll-(-14|(o, f®l<yll-H^< —......^r.&..^2...5s^..^^ •••^200 ^n^T TWF (^rf^p^) ^n^T^^iN? ^TF '3?T^T$CTT^ '^HW^ft^ 37?^? ^-^- In view of above, fhe direction to fhe respondent petitioner for grant of two ad^| dated 21.9.1974 issued by th^ verification of tlie facts pleade^ eight weeks froxn today. Jpetition is disposed of witli a autihorities to decide the claim of the ^aiice iacreinents as per circular th^; State of Madhya Pmdesh after m tlie petition withia a period of ^Tqfepft^ T[TTOf ^f fe^ 'tf^^R ^ 3fRw ^TT^T Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge 4-