1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Contempt Petition No. 265 of 2009 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders 1. Heard Shri V.D.Gunale, Advocate for the Petitioner. It is submitted that Respondent No. 2 posed himself as Secretary and sent proposal and pension papers of Respondent No. 1 to Respondent No. 3 and this amounts to contempt. 2. Learned Counsel has drawn my attention to observations in paragraph 8 of judgment in Writ Petition No.6073 of 2005 decided by this Court on 22.9.2005. Respondent No. 2 is said to have sent proposal, but he was not party to the writ petition. 3. In my opinion, mere sending of pension papers and proposal by Respondent No.2, who was not party to the writ petition, cannot be said to be contempt of the court. 2 4. In this view of the matter, contempt petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner will have liberty to avail any other remedy available in law in respect of the proposal. Date:23/09/2009 (P.R. Borkar,J.) pnd/CP265.09