1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2715 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri A.B. Borkar for the Petitioners. Shri Anjali Uthale for Respondent Nos.1A to 1E and 2. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 8th February, 2010. P.C.: . Learned counsel appearing for the Respondents made a grievance that there is no such application made by the Petitioners which is referred to in the order dated 25th August, 2009 passed by the this Court and that the Peititioners have made a false statement. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners states that on 25th August, 2009, he made a statement regarding the application made by the Petitioners on instructions of Shri Virendra Pawar, Advocate, Satara. He stated that the statement which is recorded in the order dated 12th October, 2009 was also made by him on the instructions of the same Advocate. He states that after an objection was raised by the learned counsel 2 appearing for the Respondents, he again made a specific inquiry with the said Advocate and thereafter, it was revealed that such application has not been filed. He stated that Shri Virendra Pawar, Advocate informed him that he had given instructions on the basis of the instructions received from an Advocate who is appearing for the Petitioners in the Court at Patan. 3. Thus, the statements made by the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners on instructions have turned to be totally incorrect statements. On the basis of the said statement, notice was issued by this Court on 25th August, 2009 and directions were issued for disposal of the earlier application. As the said statements made by the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners on instructions were incorrect, no interference is called for in extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The power of superintendence cannot be exercised in favour of the Petitioners in view of their conduct of making a false statement. The Writ Petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA, J) ash