IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR SECOND APPEAL Nos.815 and 821 of 1999 BETWEEN Palyam Venkataramana …APPELLANT AND Sri Ghantasala Satyanarayana and another. …RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: MR. S.S. BHATT Counsel for the Respondents: MR. N. PRAMOD The Court made the following: - COMMON JUDGMENT: Mr. S.S. Bhatt, learned counsel for appellant, represents today that the registered letter sent by him to the appellant has come back with an endorsement not claimed, which is produced in the Court and made part of the record. In view of that the learned counsel states that apparently the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 2. Even otherwise, S.A.Nos.629 and 655 of 1999 were already dismissed by judgment dated 29.06.2011 as not pressed in view of the subsequent events, which are equally applicable to this case also. These two appeals were not disposed of along with the said appeals only in view of the request of the learned counsel for the appellant to grant time to enable him to inform the appellant. Now that the learned counsel’s letter has come back unclaimed, it is apparent that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeals. For the reasons mentioned in S.A.Nos.629 and 655 of 1999, the present second appeals are also dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J August 5, 2011 DSK