IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU WRIT PETITION No.26008 of 2009 Between: M.R.Raghu. … Petitioner And Indian Bank, represented by its authorized officer. … Respondent This Court made the following: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU WRIT PETITION No.26008 of 2009 ORDER: - (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy) Petitioner without availing the alternative remedy of appeal under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for brevity, “the Act”), filed this writ petition questioning the sale notice issued by the respondent-bank for due recovery of the borrowed amount under the Act. In view of the effective alternative remedy available to the petitioner and as he can raise all the grounds in the appeal, which are raised in the present writ petition, we see no ground to entertain the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy. No order as to costs. ___________________ (A.GOPAL REDDY, J) _________________________________ (SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J) 30.11.2009. Lmv