1 rpwst.18692.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Review Petition No. (ST) 18692 of 2011 IN Writ Petition No. 3099 of 2011 Vishandas Hotchand Jodhwani ....Petitioner v/s. Mr. Hiranand Udaram Udasi ....Respondent Mr. Uday Warunjikar for the petitioner. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 26th July, 2011 PC: Taken up for admission. 2. Shri Warunjikar, the learned Counsel for the Review petitioner submits that while dismissing the civil revision application, this Court has not considered that there was no pleading insofar as bonafide need is concerned. 3. The Court was considering Civil Revision Application arising out of concurrent findings of fact. Unless any perversity or impossibility was noticed therein, exercise of revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 would not have been warranted. 4. In that view of the matter, no error apparent on the face of record is noticed. Review Application is rejected. (B.R. GAVAI, J)