HJGH CQURT OF (‘HHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 2833 of 2007 PETITIONERS : 1. D01 Narayan Patel Aged about 50 Years, S/o, Shri Dwarika Prasad Patei, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Pn'mary School Marki, Block Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) . Vijay Shanker Patel, aged about 35 years, S/o Pitambar Singh Patel, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Marki Block Kharsia, Disft. Raigarh (C,G:) 3. Battu Lal Bhasker aged about 48 years, S/o Ram Ratan Bhaskera Assistant Teacher, Govt, Middle School Telikot, Block Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C‘Gl) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : l, State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Depaxtment D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C,G,) 2. The Director Public Instruction Department Raipur (C,G,) 3. District Education Omcer Raigarh District Raigath (C.G,) Block Education Officer Kharsia (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Raigarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) I)n VVRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE_226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Single Bench : Hon’ble Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. Present: Shri Anil Mourya, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. . ORDER (Passed on 8m day orMay, 2007) I. The question of law involved herein is asto Whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f the date of initial appointment or nom the date of completion ofprobation period. K/ @ Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as we1l as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law invoived in the present writ petition are the same as to that of in W.P.(S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushjl Tiwari and others Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh & Others), which was allowed vide order dated 7. 1 1.2066. In View ofthe above-stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to COStS. l l Sd/- ‘ Satish K. Agnihotri g Judge Amit