IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 2354 of 2008. Decided on: 30.08.2010. __________________________________________________________ Rewa Shankar Kaushik. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. Respondent No.4 ex-parte. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Petitioner is confining his relief after his regularization from 1981 only. Consequently, in view of the directions issued by this Court in Paras Ram versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another, CWP(T) No.7712 of 2008, decided on 19.5.2009, the respondents are directed to count the ad hoc period followed by regularization only for the purpose of increments and pensionary benefits alone. Needful be done within a period of ten weeks after the receipt of certified coy of this judgment. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 30, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.