1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 366 OF 2009 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 202 OF 2008 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3024 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5400 OF 1996 The Workman through the General Secretary of ISP/CNP Staff Union .. Applicant. vs. Union of India & Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. S.M. Dharap for the applicant. Mr. N.V. Masurkar with D.A. Dubey i/by Pankaj Kapoor for the Respondents. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 34 OF 2010 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 202 OF 2008 2 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3024 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5400 OF 1996 Union of India & Ors. .. Applicants. vs. The Workman through the General Secretary of ISP/CNP Staff Union & Anr. ... Respondents. Mr. N.V. Masurkar with D.A. Dubey i/by Pankaj Kapoor for the Applicants. Mr. S.M. Dharap for the Respondents. CORAM : J. N. PATEL & SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : 7TH APRIL, 2010 (IN CHAMBER AT 2.40 p.m.) P.C. : In view of the fact that the Supreme Court by its order dated 11.12.2009 has set aside the impugned orders and allowed the Letters Patent Appeal and directed that the writ petition shall be heard on merits within a period of three months from the date of 3 depositing the amount of cost, there is no need of giving any clarification of our orders which do not survive as the matter now will have to be heard by the learned Single Judge assigned with the writ petition filed by the petitioner. It will be open for the parties to seek appropriate orders in respect of their claim by raising appropriate contentions. The matter be placed before the learned Single Judge. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the original petitioner submits that while allowing the Special Leave Petition the order dismissing the Letters Patent Appeal has been quashed and set aside but all other interim orders will continue to stand and are not affected by Supreme Court allowing the Special Leave Petition. It will be appropriate that in this regard the parties seek clarification from the Hon'ble the Supreme Court. 3. Both the Civil Applications stand dismissed. 4. Liberty to mention before the learned Single Judge. ( J. N. PATEL, J.) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)