IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 8129 of 2009 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: May 26, 2009 Sudarshan Ram …Petitioner Versus Union of India and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA Present: Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action by pleading all the substantive law, namely, rules, regulations and instructions as the present petition lacks particular in that regard. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (H.S. BHALLA) May 26, 2009 JUDGE Pkapoor 2