Crl. Misc. No. M-33943 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-33943 of 2010 (O&M) Decided on : 11-08-2011 Sagru Khan ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr. Deepinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. J.S.Rattu, DAG, Haryana MAHESH GROVER, J The instant petition was filed with a grievance that the respondents were not conducting the investigation fairly and have not taken any action against the accused persons who have caused serious injuries to the petitioner. Reply filed earlier was found grossly unsatisfactory. After the displeasure of the Court was expressed in the order dated 26.7.2011, the official respondents have filed a fresh reply by way of additional affidavit of Rajbir Singh, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Hathin and the same is taken on record. According to this affidavit, three of the persons have been arrested after inquiry and four were exonerated and challan has since been submitted against the persons who have been arrested and whose complicity in the commission of the offence was established. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that according to him one Abdul Hamid named by the petitioner was the person who caused Crl. Misc. No. M-33943 of 2010 (O&M) 2 serious injuries to him resulting in multiple fracture of the skull. It is possible that the contentions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the narration and version of the occurrence as given out by the petitioner may be correct but this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C has no mechanism to comment upon the issue whether a person has been rightly let off by the police during investigation or not. The petitioner has ample remedies which he can avail of during the course of trial by making an appropriate prayer at the relevant stage of trial. He can also raise his grievance regarding the complicity of Abdul Hamid who has been named by the petitioner. The Trial Court is also empowered likewise to take notice of the grievance of the petitioner. Hence, the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C is thus disposed of in the aforesaid terms. August 11, 2011 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge