IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 16TH BHADRA 1933 WA.No. 1320 of 2011() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.19301/2011 Dated 18/07/2011 .................... APPELLANT(S): PETITIONER ------------------------ UNIQUE WOOD SYSTEMS, MUDICKAL.P.O., PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-683547. REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER MR.T.A. ABDULLA. BY ADV. SRI.SHAJI CHIRAYATH SMT.JIJI M. VARKEY RESPONDENT(S): /RESPONDENTS --------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695004. 2. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT, ELECTRICAL SECTION, VAZHAKULAM, KE RALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-683547. MR.SATHYANATHA MENON, SC THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/09/2011, ALONG WITH W.A.NO.1321/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. .................................................................... W.A. Nos.1320 & 1321 of 2011 .................................................................... Dated this the 7th day of September, 2011. J U D G M E N T Ramachandran Nair, J. Dispute raised in both the Writ Appeals is against the demand of additional cash security by the Kerala State Electricity Board from the very same appellant, who is running a Small Scale Industrial Unit. Rule based on which additional cash security demanded is not under challenge in the WP(C)s filed before this Court. All what the learned Single Judge has held is that there is no need to issue notice before demanding additional cash security. On this issue we do not think the findings of the learned Single Judge calls for interference. However, since the appellant has contended that demand of cash security is not in accordance with the Rules and interest also is not being paid to it, we feel all disputes could be settled by the Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA). 2. Accordingly, we dispose of both the Writ Appeals W.A.Nos.1320 & 1321/2011 2 directing the appellant to make application before the PLA, Ernakulam for the Adalat to settle the disputes through adjudication. These Writ Appeals are disposed of modifying the judgment of the learned Single Judge as above. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) (P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE) jg