HE€§§-§ COEJR‘E' QF CHH&TTH$GARH AT SRA$PL§R DIVESION BENCH CGRAM: HSNELE SHRI RAJEEV GU?TA, CJ, HGN’BLE $HH SUNFL KUMAR SENHA, J“ Misc. Appea§ Na. TM of 2mm Dharamkumari wife of Shri Ramsiya Goutam, aged abcui 45 years Occupatiori -— Heuse, wife, Re5iden’t of viHagss Sodawar, PD. 3odhwar, Poiice Station Amaliya; Tahsi! Sihawai, District Sidhi (MR) {E‘Jméhm of me €§ece&sed) ,Appeiiam Claimant Reggamigms Ramesh Yadav son of Shri Sitgram Yad&v, Resaédant 9f vmage Ramnagar, Paiice Statmn Ramnagar, Janpad Banaras, District Banaras (UR) 4Dréww} Ashutash Smgh Yadav son of Shri Kaptan Singh Yadav, Resident 6f Sudama Shanti .Niketan, Murdana Sonbha‘dra, Diwic’c Sonbhadra (UR) @wraer M ihe Vehic§e§ JO WERSQJéE The Orientai insurance Company Limited, Through Branch” Officé Manendragarh Road, Near Ambedkar Chowk, Ambékapur, Di3trict Surguja (C.G.)' {haswer} Ramsiya Goutam San of Shri Ramanu} Goutam, ageé abeut 5O yeafs, Occupation —- Govt. Servant, Upper“ Division Teacher, Resident of Village Sodawar, PO Sodhwar, Police Station Amaliya, Tahsii Sihawai, Bisirict Sidhi (MP) ///\ iFaiha oz? mg Beceaseqg b). § 5 Man§$ha Goutam Wife of Late Shri Shyamaoharan Goutam, aged about 3O years, Occupation — House Wife (Wife a? the ibeceasw) 6 KuBhawna Dfo Late Shri Shyamacharan Goutam, aged about O3 years, Minor; Through : her natural guardian Mother Manisha Goutam, Wife of Late Shri Shyamacharan Goutam {Bauqhter «1f me geceased} Both resident of Kumda Colliery, Pelloe Statlcn Bishrampur, Tahsil Suragpur, District Surguja {QG} Mieeelianeeus Appeal under Qection 173 0f Meier Vehicies Aer Present: Shri Sushil Dubey, learned counsel forthe appellant. oRoER (rolhAugust, 2009) The following order of the Court was passed by Raleeu Gupta, Cu}. This matter s listed today for orders on the appellant’s i default in not taking necessary steps for service of the notice of the appeal on the respondents in compliance of the order dated 18.06.2097. 2) On 18.06.2007, the foilowlng order was passed in the appeat “Heard Shrl V. Vijay, counsel for the appellant Admit. issue notice to the respondents as per rules.” ’_/e/ ‘x. t 3) On the appellant’s failure to take steps in compiiance of the order dated 18.0620017, the matter was ptaced before the Additionat Registrar (Judiciai) on 09.07.20Q7. As no one appeared 0n behatf of the appettant befere the Additional Registrar (Judiciet); the matter was adjourned for a week and thereafter, was listed again before the Addttionel Registrar (Judl) on 16.07.2007. On 16.07.2097, 3hrl Ganeeh Gupta, Advocate appeared on behalf of the appellant and sought a week’s time for payment of procees fee in compliance of the order dated 18.06.2007. ' 4) Though a period of more than two years has elapsed since the passing of the order dated 18.06.2U07 and grant of opportunity , vide order dated 16.07.2007 by the Additionai Registrar (Judicial), the appellant has miserably failed in taking steps for service of the notice of the appeal on the respondents. 5) in this view of the matter,’we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeai for non—compliance of the order dated 18.06.2007. 6) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for non~compliance of the subbu order dated 'l 8.06.2007. L\ Sdl— Sd/— Sunil Kumar Sinha r Chief Justice K Judges? is l l .j.