1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 10818 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 10818 OF 2010 *** 1. Heard Advocate Shri Undre with Advocate Shri Katneshwarkar for Petitioner, learned A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Advocate Shri V.D.Patnoorkar for Respondent Nos.3 to 8. 2. Challenge in this petition is to communication dated 14th September, 2010 issued by Respondent No.1 to his subordinate intimating him about the developments because of orders of this Court dated 29th June, 2010 in Writ Petition No.1426 of 2009. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner contends that this Court has not set aside mutation entry dated 21st February, 2009 and hence direction to that effect, as contained in said communication, is excessive. In any case, such direction could not have been issued without hearing petitioner. 4. Shri Patnoorkar as also learned A.G.P. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 10818 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. state that mutation entry dated 21st February, 2009 is fall out of the order dated 21st February, 2009 and order dated 21st February, 2009 has been set aside by this Court in its judgment dated 29th June, 2010. Because of that judgment only the mutation entry has been directed to be deleted and fresh hearing has been ordered. 5. Shri Patnoorkar states that accordingly fresh measurement has already been undertaken and report has been submitted. 6. After hearing respective counsel, it has become clear that mutation entry sought to be deleted was fall out of the order dated 21st January, 2009 which has been set aside by this Court in above mentioned writ petition. As the impugned order goes, mutation entry also is liable to go. The Respondent No.1 has, therefore, rightly issued appropriate directions. 7. No prejudice is caused to any of the 3 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 10818 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. parties because of the same. Writ petition is, therefore, misconceived; same is accordingly rejected. No costs. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:09/02/2011. ans/10818