'^y y^G'ff SIN6LE QENCN y IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S)No. 34 g 2- QF 2010. PETITIONERS r^ ?^ ^^/^ oy ^.^w ^' ^ >^C<;rY./'' ^'''.-••'.'i^V" '/^^ /.^ /' ly ^B ^ :>•" ; 1. Kishan Lal Sahu, S/o. Shri Phul Singh Sahu, aged about 50 years, Occupation Head Master, Govt. Primary School Podideeh, Block Nagri District Dhamtari (C. G.) ^ 2. Hemant Kumar Sahu, S/o. Shri Nathu Lal Sahu, aged about 51 years, Occupation Head Master, Govt. Primary School Jangalpara Chhipali, Block Nagri, District Dhamtari (C. G.) 3. Smt. Saroj Pradhan, W/o. Shri J. L. Pradhan, aged about 42 years, Occupation Head Master, Govt. Primary School Amali, Block Nagri, District Dhamtari (C. G.) 4. Rishi Kumar Sahu, S/o. Shri Niranjan Singh Sahu, aged about 35 years, Occupation Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Karaiha, Block Nagri, District , Dhamtari (C. G.) 5. Deepak Kumar Sharma, S/o. Shri Suraj Prasad Sharma, aged about 34 years, Occupation Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Malhari, Block Nagri, District Dhamtari (C. G.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS ^ : 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2. District Education Officer, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C. G.) WRIT PETITIQIt UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC—78 f~ ~?ST "MI'MIO^, ®T)|yi(o,fs<diyy, ^ ^ P y ^-^'^^)0 sn^i vi R-fi'* wian^rwiN? Tunrane 3^r Tra^i' ('^sii;ps?) warw ^to aii^r q'i<il<,i<n-f tiliRff ? fs<3t <F>lt$it '^stfimsn^i SB: Hon'ble Shrt Manindra Mohan airivastava. •(. 15-07-2010 Shri Somkant Verma, oounsel fo Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel Lavi| advance oopy. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioni^r submits that the petitioners, who were working as Assistant Teacher^ Master whereas number of Assistant Upper Division Teaoher. Learned o( submits that the petitioners have rrjade a representation before the concernecl respondent authority statinj Upper Division Teacher. Without rommenting on the m^ interest of justice, it would be proper authority to consider petitioners repre^entation and take dwision on the same, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid direction, the the petituners. yer for the State/respondents on have been promoted as Head Feachers ha\/e been promoted as lunsel for the petitionere further that they should be promoted as its of the petitioners olaim, in the o direct the concerned respondent petition Is finally disposed of. Sd/- Mamndra Mohan Shrivastava Judge 1