C.O.C.P.No.1334 of 2004 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.O.C.P.No.1334 of 2004 Date of Decision:-7.8.2009 Harpal Singh ...Petitioner Versus Amardeep Jain and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: None. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): The petitioner has alleged that in view of the order dated 7.5.2004 passed by this Court in CR No.3090 of 2002, the respondents were directed to issue notice to the petitioner calculating simple interest @ 10% per annum for depositing the amount and if any such notice is issued, then the amount be deposited within 30 days from the receipt of such notice, but the aforesaid order has not been complied with by the respondents till date and, therefore, they are liable to be punished under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. I have perused the record of this petition. I find that aforesaid Civil Revision No.3090 of 2002 had arisen out of the proceedings on an application filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC between the parties. The petitioner has not mentioned in the petition with regard to the status of the main case in C.O.C.P.No.1334 of 2004 2 which the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC was filed. On 16.7.2009, the counsel for the petitioner had sought time to inform this Court with regard to the pendency of the main suit. However, no such information has been supplied by the petitioner. In any case, the order dated 7.5.2004 passed by this Court in CR No.3090 of 2002 being in the nature of interim order, the petitioner has an effective and efficacious remedy under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC. In view of the aforesaid, I am not inclined to proceed further with this petition. Dismissed. Rule discharged. 7.8.2009 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) AS Judge