1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52687 of 2008 BINDA MAHTO SON OF SRI PUNIT MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PIPARPATI,P.S.RAJAULI,DISTRICT NAWADA Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.5924 of 2009 1.HIRA MAHTO SON OF SRI INDRADEO MAHTO 2.UMESH MAHTO SON OF LATE RAM BHAJJU MAHTO BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PIPARPATI,P.S.RAJAULI,DISTRICT NAWADA Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.4113 of 2009 1.AJAY MAHTO SON OF INDERDEO MAHTO 2.RAJESH MAHTO SON OF LATE TETAR MAHTO 3.INDERDEO MAHTO SON OF LATE SHIVAN MAHTO ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PIPARPATI,P.S.RAJAULI,DISTRICT NAWADA Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.8429 of 2009 1.KRISHNA PRASAD SON OF LATE PRAMESHWAR MAHTO 2.ANIL MAHTO SON OF PRASADI MAHTO 3.AMIRAK MAHTO SON OF RAMDHANI MAHTO ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PIPARPATI,P.S.RAJAULI,DISTRICT NAWADA Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.12354 of 2009 NARESH MAHTO SON OF RAM BHAJJU MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PIPARPATI,P.S.RAJAULI,DISTRICT NAWADA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 10.4.2009 Since all the above five applications arise out of one and the same police case, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners seek bail in a case which has been registered for offences under Sections 307 and some other Sections of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Suraj Mahto has given a written report on 23.7.2008 alleging therein that about preceding 6-7 P.M. he saw the accused persons, who were variously armed near the house of Punit Mahto, assaulting 2 indiscriminately to his son Chandradeo Mahto alias Chamari Mahto. Submission is that there is case and counter case. Co-accused Umesh Prasad also sustained head injury at the hands of prosecution party for which Umesh Prasad has given his fardbeyan while he was under treatment in Sadar Hospital, Emergency Ward, Nawada but for that a case under Sections 323,504 and some other Sections of the Indian Penal Code only has been registered although the injuries were grievous and dangerous to life. Further submission is that for the injured of the present case, there is no injury report on the record and only C.T.Scan report has been brought which discloses that there was no fatal injury. It is also stated that similarly situated many co-accused namely, Punit Mahto, Ram Swaroop Mahto, Sajan Mahto, Chanda Mahto alias Ghutar Mahto and Karu Prasad alias Karu Prasad Mahto have been granted bail by a Bench of this Court on 23.1.2009 Vide Cr.Misc.No. 51408 of 2008. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners of all the five applications be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in Rajauli P.S.Case No. 96 of 2008. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)