Crl. Misc. No.M-25892 of 2009 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-25892 of 2009 Date of Decision:22.07.2010 Amarjit and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Satyavir Singh Yadav, DAG, Haryana. ..... SABINA, J. Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of order dated 18.08.2009 (annexure-P4). Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that vide the impugned order the second sample has been ordered to be sent for analysis to Central Forensic Science Laboratory, Chandigarh. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further submitted that the second sample was liable to be sent to the same laboratory for analysis i.e. CFSL, Madhuban. Learned State counsel on the other hand, has submitted that there is no bar in sending the second sample for analysis to a different laboratory. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves dismissal. Two samples of 5 grams each were separated, from the packet of contraband recovered from the petitioners. In all 5 packets containing contraband were recovered from the petitioners. As per the report of the Central Forensic Science Laboratory, Madhuban contraband was not detected in the samples. The prosecution filed an Crl. Misc. No.M-25892 of 2009 2 application for sending the second sample parcel to Central Forensic Science Laboratory, Chandigarh for analysis. Vide the impugned order the said application has been allowed by the trial Court. There is no bar for sending the second sample for analysis to another laboratory. In these circumstances, no ground for interference by this Court is called for. Dismissed. (SABINA) JUDGE 22.07.2010 sharmila