C.W.P. No.19022 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.19022 of 2011 Date of Decision.12.10.2011 M/s Bhaika Pesticide and Seeds Store, Grain Market, Goniana, Distt. Bathinda through Sh. Daljit Singh its Prop. .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through its Secretary, Agriculture Department, Punjab Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Arun Chandra, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The writ petition seeks to challenge the order passed by the appellate authority namely the Joint Director, Agriculture under the provisions of Insecticide Act, 1968. The authority has in its order made a reference to the petitioner's statement alleged to have been made that he would not sell the products of M/s Western Crop Science Gujrat and in such a situation, the licence has been allowed to continue but it is specifically brought through the impugned order that the petitioner would be barred from selling of the products from M/s Western Crop Science Gujrat to M/s Bhaika Pesticides and Seeds Store Grain Market, Goniana, Distt. Bathinda. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that such a statement had not been made before the authority. If the order records a concession alleged to have been made by the petitioner and the C.W.P. No.19022 of 2011 -2- petitioner would still contend that such a statement was not made, the appropriate remedy would be to apply to the very same authority seeking for review of the decision that has been taken on an alleged concession. It shall not be open to the petitioner to contend that the statement was not made to the authority in such a fashion, although the order reads thus. 3. The writ petition is disposed of. The petitioner will be at liberty to approach the same authority for reconsideration of the decision by representing that such concession which the order records was not made by the petitioner. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 12, 2011 Pankaj*