IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4419 of 2010 Dr. Parashurm Singh . Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. . ----------- 7 06.07.2011 Heard Mr. A.B. Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sajjal Kumar Sinha, A.C. to Mr. Ajay Bharti Sinha, learned counsel for the University. The writ petition was disposed of with the direction to the University to consider the claim of the petitioner with regard to 50% merger of the dearness allowance in the light of the Division Bench order of this Court passed in L.P.A. No. 434 of 2008 placed at Annexure-4 of the writ petition, the claim of the petitioner in relation to medical allowance of Rs. 100/- and in relation to U.G.C. arrears. The petitioner was also given liberty to raise his claim for interest in terms of the relevant Statue/Circular of the University on the issue of interest on the belated payment of his retiral benefits and which was to be considered and disposed of by a reasoned order. The reasoned order passed by the Registrar is placed at Annexure-A to the show cause. In so far as issue of 50% merger of dearness allowance in the light of the order passed in L.P.A. No. 434 of 2008 is concerned, it is stated that the same is sub-judice before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. As regarding the payment of Medical allowance is concerned, it is stated that no such decision has been taken by the Government nor any of the staff of the University is being paid as such. In so far as U.G.C. arrears is concerned, learned counsel for 2 the petitioner admits to its payment. In so far as interest is concerned, a cheque for an amount of Rs. 16,515/- being interest on belated payment of provident fund has been handed over to the petitioner. Mr. A.B. Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioner disputes the calculation of interest on the F.P. amount as well as the decision of the respondent authority in refusing to pay the medical allowance to the petitioner . Taking into consideration that the Registrar of the University has discharged his obligation as cast upon him under the directions of this Court, nothing survives in the present proceeding and the contempt application is accordingly, disposed of. In far as the petitioner disputes the calculation of interest and claims medical allowance, the petitioner if so advised may raise his grievance by filing an appropriate application before an appropriate forum. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J.)