IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 299 of 2004 Date of decision: September 27, 2010 Jagdish .. Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Haryana for the respondent-State. A.N. Jindal, J The trial court vide judgment dated 6.9.2003 convicted the accused-petitioner Jagdish (herein referred as 'the accused') along with his co-accused – non-petitioner Jit Singh, Krishan and Raj Pal under Sections 323/506/148/149 IPC. However, they were extended benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act. Feeling aggrieved, accused Jagdish alone has come up in revision. Arguments heard. Having examined the impugned judgment, the evidence appears to have been appreciated in the right perspective. No illegality much less irregularity or perversity has been detected or pointed out warranting interference by this Court. It has also been brought to my notice that the period of probation has already been expired. Consequently, finding no merit in the revision petition the same is dismissed. September 27, 2010 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge