Crl.M.No.M-30261 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-30261 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:October 12, 2010 Jagdev Singh .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Nonish Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.54139 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-30261 of 2010 The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.86, dated 15.7.2010, under Sections 452, 354, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Jhulka, Patiala, District Patiala. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully, including the impugned order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala, vide which application filed on behalf of the present petitioner for anticipatory bail was dismissed. Brief allegations against the petitioner-accused are that he entered the house of the complainant by scaling the wall when her husband and father-in-law were out of the house and outraged her modesty. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that name of petitioner has not been correctly mentioned in the FIR. However, petitioner is of the same village and known to the complainant. Name of his father is correctly mentioned. It is not the case of the petitioner that another son of Kirpal Singh is involved in the occurrence. Crl.M.No.M-30261 of 2010 (O&M) -2- There are serious allegations against the petitioner-accused. It is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused. Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Jagdev Singh for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 12.10.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge