IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 575 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 12/12/2008 in WP NO : 27038 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: The Management, A.P. Dairy Development Cooperative Federation Limited, Lalapet, Hyderabad. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 K. Veeraswamy, S/o. K. Narasiah CODE No. 1461/1623, Rep. by Authorized Representative Mr. Sudershan Singh C/o. Shelter 3-4-472, Barkatpura, Hyderabad. 2 The Additional Industrial Tribunal Cum Additional Labour Court, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: SRI M.DILIP RAO Counsel for the RespondentS: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 575 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) The present writ appeal is preferred by the appellant- management aggrieved by the order, dated 12.12.2008 in WPMP No.35420 of 2008 in W.P.No.27038 of 2008. The appellant-management filed the above writ petition seeking to call for records pertaining to the order, dated 12.2.2008 in M.P.No.19 of 2005 on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same. The appellant also filed WPMP No.35420 of 2008 seeking suspension of the order, dated 12.2.2008 in M.P.No.19 of 2005. While admitting the writ petition, the learned single Judge passed the order suspending the order, dated 12.2.2008 in M.P.No.19 of 2005 on the file of the Additional Industrial Tribunal-cum-Additional Labour Court, Hyderabad, on condition of the petitioner depositing 50% of the amount to the credit of M.P.No.19 of 2005 within a period of six weeks from today. It was made clear that on such deposit, the 1st respondent is entitled to withdraw the same, without furnishing security. Having aggrieved by the conditional order, the writ petitioner filed the present appeal. Heard the learned Counsel and perused the material available on record. The present appeal is filed against the interlocutory orders viz., order of interim suspension passed in WPMP No.35420 of 2008 in WP No.27038 of 2008. The main writ petition is pending. If the appellant is aggrieved by the conditional order, it can take steps for filing vacate stay petition and it is not precluded from filing such a petition, if so desires. Without availing such remedies, the approach of the appellant by filing this appeal, is a premature one. In this view of the matter, we feel that this appeal is devoid of merits and as such, the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed. No order as costs. _________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari ____________________________ Justice VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR Date: 30th April, 2009 Nn. THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 575 of 2009 (Judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) 30th April, 2009