IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32840 of 2010 TAPESHWAR CHAUDHARY, son of Ramdeo Chaudhary Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/- 03.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for State. Admittedly, petitioner is not named in the First Information Report. In course of investigation, it came to light that the looted mobile was being used by one Rajendra Paswan and when I.O. interrogated the father of the aforesaid, Rajendra Paswan, the father of aforesaid Rajendra Paswan disclosed that his son had exchanged the stolen mobile from petitioner and subsequently his son had gone to return the aforesaid mobile. Furthermore, I.O. went to the village of the petitioner and recovered the stolen mobile from the place where the Panchayat was going on. The impugned order of learned Sessions Judge reveals that the petitioner was put on Test Identification Parade but the informant could not succeed to identify the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, 2 above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghatti at Gaya in connection with Sherghatti (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 96 of 2010. Ashwini/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)