IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30.3.2011 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition Nos.7000,7001 and 7002 of 2011 1 M/S.USHA STEEL TRADERS REP BY ITS PROPRIETRIX R.USHA RANI 40 T.H.ROAD ERUKKENCHERRY CHENNAI 118 [ PETITIONER IN ALL THE WRIT PETITIONS] Vs 1 THE ASST. COMMISSIONER (CT) MANALI ASSESSMENT CIRCLE KURALAGAM ANNEXE FIRST FLOOR CHENNAI 108 [ RESPONDENT IN ALL THE WRIT PETITIONS] W.P.No.7000 of 2011: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in TIN 33131080697/2006-07 dated 30.7.2010, quash the same and further direct the respondent to consider the objection filed by the petitioner. W.P.No.7001 of 2011: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in TIN 33131080697/2007-08 dated 30.7.2010, quash the same and further direct the respondent to consider the objection filed by the petitioner. W.P.No.7002 of 2011: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in TIN 33131080697/2008-09 dated 30.7.2010, quash the same and further direct the respondent to consider the objection filed by the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For petitioner : Mr.P.V.Sudhakar For respondents : Mr.R.Mahadevan Additional Government Pleader C O M M O N O R D E R At this stage of the hearing of the writ petitions, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the impugned proceedings of the respondent, dated 30.7.2010, are set aside and the matters are remitted back to the respondent to pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on considering the objections filed by the petitioner, on 22.6.2010 and 23.6.2010. 2. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent has no objection for this Court passing such an order. 3. Hence, the impugned proceedings of the respondent, dated 30.7.2010, relating to the assessment years 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09, are set aside. However, it is made clear that it would be open to the respondent to pass appropriate assessment orders for the relevant years, on merits and in accordance with law, by considering the objections, dated 22.6.2010, and 23.6.2010, filed by the petitioner and by considering the documents to be submitted by the petitioner, within a period of two weeks from today. The writ petitions are ordered accordingly. No costs. Connected M.P.Nos.1,1 and 1 of 2011 are closed. lan Sd/- Asst. Registrar //True Copy// Sub Asst. Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ To: THE ASST. COMMISSIONER (CT) MANALI ASSESSMENT CIRCLE KURALAGAM ANNEXE FIRST FLOOR CHENNAI 108 + 1 cc to Spl Government Pleader (T), SR No.22839 + 3 ccs to Mr. P.V. Sudhakar, Advocate SR No.23161 Writ Petition Nos.7000,7001 and 7002 of 2011 BKY(CO) SR/5.4.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/