IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2009 / 21ST JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 16143 of 2009(K) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------------- NISHANTH K., S/O. P.T.KRIPAKARAN, AGED 27 YEARS, SREEVALSAM, VADASSERY, KERALASSERY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. MR.DENIZEN KOMATH, MR.SHERRY J. THOMAS. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., PIN-673 635. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY POST, PIN-673 635. 3. THE ELIJA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, KURICHIKKARA, PONGANAMKAD, THRISSUR-28, REPRESENTED BY ITS DEAN AND PRINCIPAL. BY ADV. MR. P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, CLT UTY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No.16143 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 11th June,2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner seeks second revaluation of his paper in 'Advertisement and Sales Promotion' as part of the MBA course. It seems that his request for revaluation was accepted but according to the petitioner, it has not been properly done. He refers to Exhibit-P3 dated 23.10.2007, which is intimated by the Controller of Examinations enclosing there with a copy of the answer sheet relating to Advertisement and Sales Promotion. Therefore he filed Exhibit P4 dated 15.4.2008 before the 2nd respondent. This writ petition is filed after a period of one year. I do not think it is a fit case to issue a direction to the University to call for the entire records to find out whether revaluation has been properly done. The University is entitled to proceed on the premise that at some point of time the process regarding valuation and revaluation of any particular examination should be W.P ( C) No.16143 of 2009 2 treated as having been settled once for ever. The writ petition is bereft of merit and hence dismissed. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.16143 of 2009 3 W.P ( C) No.16143 of 2009 4