IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 2ND AUGUST 2010 / 11TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 24050 of 2010(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- K.SUDHAKARAN, S/O.PADMANABHAN NAIR, POKKINARAMBATH HOUSE, KOLATHARA, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. KOZHIKODE CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, KOZHIKODE. 2. THE SECRETARY, KOZHIKODE CORPORATION, KOZHIKODE. 3. THE HEALTH OFFICER, KOZHIKODE CORPORATION, KOZHIKODE. 4. THE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY, KOZHIKODE CORPORATION, KOZHIKODE. ADV. SRI.P.V.SURENDRANATH SRI.K.D.BABU, SC FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 24050 OF 2010 (E) ===================== Dated this the 2nd day of August, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner challenges Ext.P10. Petitioner is a Contingent employee in the respondent Corporation. According to the petitioner, he was working in the tapal Section, but was later deployed to sanitation section. His request for a posting in the tapal section was directed to be considered by Ext.P9. Subsequently, by Ext.P10 order, referring to the directions in Ext.P9 judgment, petitioner has been posted as Watchmen in the crematorium. It is thereupon the writ petition is filed. 2. As far as the challenge against Ext.P10 is concerned, although it is the case of the petitioner that his health condition does not permit him to discharge onerous duties, I do not think that the duties of watchmen involves any onerous duty as claimed. Being a contingent employee, it is up to the Corporation to make use of the service of its employees and in that process if the Corporation has thought it fit to post the petitioner for watchmen duty as per Ext.P10, this Court will not be justified in sitting in appeal over Ext.P10. WPC No. 24050/10 :2 : 3. Be that as it may, having regard to the grievance of the petitioner that there are vacancies available in the tapal section, where he could be accommodated, it is open to the petitioner to pursue his claim and it is for the respondents to take appropriate decision in the matter. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp