1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5001/2009 (BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD AND ANOTHER ;VS. DHARMESH GHANSYAMJI CHAVAN AND OTHERS Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. R.S.Sundaram, Advocate, for Petitioners Shri Abhay .Sambre, Adv. For Respondent no.1 Shri S.V.Bhutada, Advocate, for Respondent No.3 & 4. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JANUARY 20, 2010. Heard. Grievance of Advocate Sundaram is Appropriate Government in relation to Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 is Central Government and therefore, ULP Complaint No. 30/2008 is not maintainable against them. Advocate Sambre for Respondent No.1 states that complaint under Section 28 before labour Court seeks relief against Respondent Nos. 3 & 4. After some arguments, he states that Respondent No.1 (Original complainant before Labour Court) seeks deletion of present petitioner from array of respondents. In view of the prayer made, the present petitioner who is Respondent No.2 in the original complaint is allowed to be deleted. 2 In view of this deletion, it is apparent that the contention sought to be raised by the petitioner in the present matter is rendered only academic. Petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Rvjalit.