IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (1) Criminal Misc. No. M-2723 of 2010 Date of decision: 7.12.2011. Manisha & another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & others ..Respondents (2) Criminal Misc. No. M-29885 of 2011 Date of decision: 7.12.2011. Ramehar ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & another ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Kamal Mor, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Satyavir Singh Yadav, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Manisha in person. NAWAB SINGH, J. (ORAL) This judgment disposes of aforesaid two petitions because in both the petitions quashing of First Information Report No. 58 dated March 25th, 2007 under Sections 216, 363-A and 366 of Indian Penal Code, Police Station Sadar Gohana, District Sonepat registered against Jagbir petitioner in Criminal Misc. No. M-2723 of 2010 and his father Ramehar petitioner in Criminal Misc. No. M- 29885 of 2011, is sought. 2. On the statement of Raj Kumar, aforesaid FIR was registered against the petitioners. It was alleged by the complainant that in the month of April, 2007, his daughter Manisha was kidnapped by Jagbir with intent to compel her to marry him. Criminal Misc. No. M-2723 of 2010 (2) 3. It has been pleaded by the petitioners that Manisha married with Jagbir in the year 2007, of course, against the wishes of her father-complainant. A son of was born out of the wedlock on January 8th, 2009. They are leading a happy married life. Manisha is present in person and said so in her statement at bar. In view of this, question of kidnapping of Manisha by her husband or his father does not arise. 4. Thus, the petitions are accepted and FIR No. 58 dated March 25th, 2007 under Sections 216, 363-A and 366 IPC, Police Station Sadar Gohana, District Sonepat and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed. 7.12.2011 (NAWAB SINGH) SN JUDGE