CWP No. 1274 of 2008. 01.08.2008 Present: Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondentsNo.1 and 2. The petitioner who was working at the present place of posting has been transferred after two years and four months. The main allegation of the petitioner is that there is a political pressure of Opposite party No.5 who is a State President, Bhartiya Janta Yuva Morcha, to adjust Opposite Party No.4. It has been further submitted that a direction has been issued by the Hon’ble Chief Minister to adjust Shri Gajraj Singh. Gajraj Singh has been adjusted and accordingly Smt. Raksha Tadu, Superintendent Grade-II has been transferred. The Hon’ble Chief Minister accorded approval to the order. Thereafter in the process the petitioner has been transferred. From the perusal of the order, it does not at all show that there is any direction issued against the petitioner. Further from the perusal of the order it does not show that there was any political pressure exercised for the transfer of the petitioner. The State Government being the guardian of its employees, it has to appreciate various types of difficulties of its employees and adjust them which is neither new nor it can be stopped for the reasons it may create lot of difficulties for those who are being looked after by the State on humanitarian grounds. -2- The Hon’ble Apex Court in its various judgments has clarified that this Court can only show interference when there is a violation of law or strong case of malafides. No case is made out, as far as violation of law is concerned. However, as far as malafides are concerned, we have already discussed hereinabove. In the light of the above discussion, no interference is warranted under Article 226 of the Constitution. The writ petition is dismissed, so also the pending application. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. August 1, 2008. ( Sanjay Karol ), J. (rc)