IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- Crl. Rev. No.324 of 2009 Date of Decision:- 23.3.2009 Wazir Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & Ors. .... Respondent. Present:- Mr. Sunil Saharan, Advocate for the petitioner. M.M.S.BEDI. (J) (Oral) Crl. Misc. No. 6792 of 2009 Crl. Misc. application is allowed. Delay of 9 days in filing the revision is hereby condoned for the reasons mentioned in the application. Crl. Rev. No. 324 of 2009 On account of dislocation of the thumb of the petitioner, respondents No. 2 to 6 were tried for offence under Sections 323, 325 read with Section 34 IPC. The trial Court after appreciation of evidence has arrived at a conclusion that on account of their previous enmity respondents are entitled to be acquitted granting them the benefit of doubt. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that there are fair chances of conviction of the respondents in case the evidence is properly appreciated. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and going through the record, I find it is not a fit case where on the basis of re-appreciation of evidence, respondents can be convicted by arriving at conclusion other than the one arrived at by the trial Court. Dismissed. March 23, 2009 (M.M.S.Bedi) tripti Judge