1 Appln 1922-10 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1922 OF 2010 Khandu alias Khandya Amarnath ..Applicant Lonkar V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.P.G.Sarda, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.Geeta Mulekar, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 9TH SEPTEMBER, 2010 P.C. . This is an application for bail by ring leader, who robbed the victim a cash and other articles worth Rs.17,400/-. The contention of the learned Counsel for the applicant that the applicant was not known to the victim and therefore, without test identification parade the police should not have inferred about applicant's complicity has to be rejected because the victim was taken by the applicant's friend to the victim and there 2 Appln 1922-10 the victim came to know that applicant was Khandu alias Khandya. It is not necessary that the victim must know the accused since ages before the incident. It is good enough if the victim comes to know the name before the report of the robbery is lodged, and in that case test identification parade would not always be necessary. In any case, this is a question which can be gone into by the trial Judge at the trial. 2. Considering nature of the application, applicant is not entitled for bail. Criminal Application is rejected. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)