THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Civil Revision Petition No.2591 of 2010 ORDER: The respondent-plaintiff filed O.S.No.610 of 2008 seeking injunction simplicitor in respect of plot bearing No.5/part admeasuring 183 sq.yards situated in Survey No.9/A of Gandhamguda Village, Rajendranagar Mandal and also obtained ad interim injunction. At that stage, the petitioner-defendant filed I.A.No.742 of 2008 purportedly under Order XXVI Rule 9 of CPC, 1908 praying for appointment of an Advocate-Commissioner to note down the boundaries of the suit schedule property contending that there are variations with regard to boundaries of plot No.5 mentioned in the sale deed and actual possession. The trial Court after enquiry dismissed the application on 31.05.2010. This civil revision petition is against the said order. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the order under revision. The respondent admittedly filed the suit for declaration and it is for him to prove his case. When it is the admitted case of the petitioner that his plot is not bounded by the suit schedule property on any of the four sides, and that he had constructed a compound wall around his plot, the question of there being any boundary dispute with the respondent does not arise, particularly when it is well-protected by a compound wall and from encroachment by third parties, much less the respondent. That being so, no exception can be taken to the order under revision, passed by the Court below refusing to appoint an Advocate Commissioner, to note down the physical features of the land. In the above view of the matter, this Court finds no reason whatsoever to interfere with the order under revision in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The civil revision petition is devoid of merit, and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date:13.07.2010 VGB