COPC No. 106 of 2009 16.08.2010 Present: Pt. Om Parkash Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Gautam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate, for the respondents-contemnors. Heard Pt. Om Parkash Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner and Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate, for the respondents. 2. Though learned counsel for the parties have fairly stated before the Court that order dated 09.09.2008, passed by this Court has been complied with by the respondents-contemnors. However, Pt. Om Parkash Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner has further stated that the above order has not been complied with in its true spirit. 3. Mr. R.k. Gautam, learned Senior Advocate, for the respondents-contemnors has stated that minutes of the compliance of the order dated 09.09.2008 have not been received as and it will be always open to the petitioner to approach this Court, if not satisfied with the decision of the respondents- contemnors. 4. Pt. Om Parkash Sharma, Advocate, submits that while making compliance of the aforesaid order many juniors to the petitioner have been promoted and the petitioner's army service has not been taken into consideration. 5. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and since the respondents-contemnors have complied the order dated 09.09.2008, the contempt petition is disposed of. However, if the ...2... petitioner still has any grievance against the decision of the respondents-contemnors, he is at liberty to approach appropriate forum for redressal of his grievances. 6. In view of the above, the petitition stands disposed of. No costs. (R.B. Misra) Judge (V.K. Sharma) Judge 16th August, 2010 (virender)