IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13 of 2008 Between: Pokuri Ramalaingam S/o. Subbaiah Water Users Association, R/o. Samanthapudi Village, Darsi Mandal, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Command Area Development Authority Rep. by Commisioner, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Ongole, Prakasam District. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur Division, Prakasam District. 4 The Tahsildar (MRO) Darsi Mandal, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:NONE APPEARED ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in conducting the elections of Territorial constituencies No. 1,5,.8 and 11 in Darsi Mandal, Prakasam District without including the legitimate land holders failing under their respective Territorial Constituencies and for including Bogus and Repetitive voters in Electoral Voters List, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the Statutory Provisions of A.P. Farmers Management of Irrigation System (Act.11 of 1997 ) and A.P. Farmers Management of Irrigation System (Delineation and Formation of Water Users Association) Rules, 2003 and A.P. Farmers Management Irrigation System (Conduct of Election)Rules 2003.” On 01.06.2009, no one appeared for the petitioner. Even today, there is no appearance for the petitioner despite the fact that the writ petition is coming up under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It is, therefore, reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing his cause in the writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in default. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition in default, WPMP.No.14 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 2nd JUNE, 2009. kvni