IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR [C.G.[ P Z2JO 00 PETITIONERS : l. Arvin-d Kumar Vishwas S/o Haripad Vishwas Age approximately 34 years R/o Ward No. l6, Gandhi Ward, Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon. Sapan Kumar Sarkar S/ o Atul Kumar Sarkar Aged approximately 30 years R/o Kawardha Ward No 15 Dlstt Kawtwghq C ’21G ) VERSUS Jw" State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Dept. of Health 8r, Family Welfare D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur The C‘G. Board of Ayurvedic 85 Unani System of Medicine 8a Naturopathy, Ralpur Through the Regstrar C G Board of Ayurved1c 85 Unanl System of Medlcme 8L Naturopathy, Ralpur (C G ) / THE CONSTITUTION OF INDI A“ munann'n'mltnmms WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226i 27 OF A W NO § 23 , . . XLHC—ZZ Qxmki 2003 Shri Sandeep Dubey, Pant‘ Application for urgent h Heard. Learned counsel for petitioner would be satisfle respondents to issue an ap that he has a chance to ml and the competent authority This submission is made o otherwise qualitied to be Ayurvedik Yunani Thatha Adhiniyam, 1970. Shri Paranjpe su (W.P.No.558/2001— Zahirul] Chhattisgarh 85 Ors.) passed passed'and prays for similar of the said order is produced” Not opposed. Having considered the h and material on record, in aspects mentioned in the petition can be examined by the me of consideration. In the result, \ Competent Authority at the U‘ [itsW \ Y : Shri Manoj Paranjpe, counsel for the petitioner. F1 \ Lawyer for the State. (,I is allowed. petitioner submits ' that the if a direc1ion. ie issued to the to the petitioner so application form for enrollment may examine the same on merits. the basis that the petitioner is led as Vaidya under the M.P. Prakritic Chikitsa Vyavasayik lication fo e ts that in similar matter a Khan as Anr. Vs. State of l . on 24.04200, orders have been imiers in this petition also. A copy acts and circumstances of the case the opinion of this Court all the \ \ ‘ ‘ e e \ e l i b mg was mt W aim mnfsn W ant?! germane emit-ah 1min? d fseirm n msm a 26.04.2004 XI—HC-22 mahé’mmna’ffifwm awf‘aqm ‘ this petition is disposed of wi be given requisite farm f0 examined on merits by the Co the judgment rendered by M.] decided on 06.05.1997. The that order with the form while submitting the forms for enrolment. Sdl- \ Fakhruddin g game » j/Juclge / th the direction that the petitioner r enrollment and the same be mpetent Authority keeping in View ’. High Court in W,? No 287/ 1990 petitioner shoulgyehclose copy of Certifled copy as per ruies.