IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1027 of 2006 BABAN SINGH & ANR Versus MANTURNA DEVI & ORS ----------- 6 12.12.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioners. In the opinion of this Court, a suit of the year 1985 cannot be kept pending and that too by the plaintiff who is petitioner before this Court in this case. The Court has taken the circumstances into consideration and has also recorded that such document was never adduced either at the time of the filing of the plaint in terms of Order VII Rule 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure (C.P.C.) nor the same was produced at the time of framing of the issue in terms of Order XIII Rule 1 of the C.P.C. The Court has also taken into consideration that the evidence of the plaintiff has been closed long back and thereafter such an application was filed which was again moved after five years. The obvious laches on the part of the plaintiff-petitioner as noted above was sufficient to reject the prayer of the petitioner for allowing the additional evidence. That being so, this Court would not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order. Accordingly, this civil revision application being wholly misconceived is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)