IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11619 of 2005 BALMIKI SHARMA Versus THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND OTHRS ----------- 7. 28.4.2010. Mr. Rajesh Kumar for the petitioner, and Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma, learned Junior counsel to Mr. Dharmeshwar Mishra, representing the Board are present. The writ petition was filed for payment of the post retiral dues as set out in paragraph-13 of the writ petition. The petitioner claims of non-payment thereof having retired from the post of Head Linesman with effect from 31.3.2005. A counter affidavit was filed in the present proceeding on 16.10.2008 after its service on the petitioner’s counsel and in which it was stated that the GPF amount has been paid on 27.6.2006, G.S.S. amount on l2.12.2005 and leave encashment on 1.2.2006. Learned counsel for the petitioner further admits to the payment of the gratuity amount and the pension amount but submits that the pension is only being paid to the extent of 90% without any reason as there is no proceedings pending against the petitioner. He 2 also disputes the quantum of G.P.F. amount. Having regard to the statement made in the counter affidavit, the writ petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to raise his grievance with regard to the non payment of the 10% pension amount as also GPF amount together with the relevant documents and calculative details in support of the claim before respondent no.4 the Electrical Executive Engineer, Electrical Supply Division, Jehanabad who shall examine the claim of the petitioner and if found admissible make payment thereof within a period of three months from the date of filing of the representation. Needless to add that if any of the claim of the petitioner is not found admissible, the same should be disposed of by a reasoned and speaking order to be passed within the time stipulated above. The writ petition is disposed of with the directions aforesaid. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)