- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1177 OF 2007 Shri.Ashokkumar Deshraj @ Pappu Gouri ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr. Amit Shete Advocate for Petitioner Mr. V.B.Konde-Deshmukh APP for State ... CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : JULY 16, 2007 DATE : JULY 16, 2007 DATE : JULY 16, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Since alternate efficacious remedy in the form of appeal is available, the question of interference under writ jurisdiction, does not arise. In case, such appeal is filed by the petitioner within ten days from today, the Appellate Authority may consider the fact that the Petitioner was pursuing the remedy of writ petition - 2 - and therefore, would be entitled to avail the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. With this observation, petition is disposed of. [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]