IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25792 of 2011 Arjun Paswan, S/o. Ganauri Paswan, Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 03. 14.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for State. The petitioner is in jail custody since 22.02.2011 in a case registered under Section 395 of the I.P.C. Petitioner is not named in the first information report and for the first time the name of this petitioner came in this case on 21.02.2011 on the basis of confidential information supplied by a spy to the concerned I.O. and on the very next day petitioner was arrested from his house. Admittedly, at the time of arrest nothing has been recovered either from the conscious possession of the petitioner or from his house. It is also admitted possession that the alleged occurrence took place on 19.02.2011 and after three days of the alleged occurrence petitioner was arrested and subsequently he was put on Test Identification Parade in which the informant claimed to have identified the petitioner as one of the participants of the alleged crime. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner and informant are resident of same Panchayat and as a matter of fact the petitioner was well known to the informant much prior to the alleged occurrence and due to previous enmity the informant dragged the petitioner in the alleged crime. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as 2 well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner Arjun Paswan be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-II, Samastipur in connection with Sessions Trial No.294 of 2011/201 of 2011 arising out of Chak Mahesi P.S. Case No.11 of 2011. Mkr. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)