IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.524 of 2010 UDHAV SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 13.4.2010 I.A.No. 827 of 2010 The interlocutory application has been filed under section 5 of Limitation Act. The only ground for condoning the delay is said absence of learned counsel which could be knowledge of petitioner. The order in appeal which is challenged by filing this revision application is dated 20.8.2009. In paragraph-2 of the said order clearly mentions that counsel for both the parties were heard. Earlier also on 18.8.2009 a direction was given to the parties to come ready with the case. It transpires from the impugned order that after hearing the parties, the criminal appeal is disposed of. So, it cannot be said that the petitioner had no knowledge of the impugned order. I find no justified ground to condone the delay in filing the revision 2 application. In such view of the matter, interlocutory application stands dismissed. Subsequently, the revision application is also dismissed. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)