a IN THE HEW COURT'OF MM3H :^ ESH^^£^£pVR'~^^ M.P.NO. i<^€^of 1991 ' . ^ 'va '...-^ B'as-tar KshefcSiya Gramin Bank, jagdalpur^ Hatkachora, J'agdalpur, Distt. Bastar, through Chairman ••. Petitioner Versus .2.,Bhajendra Nath Math^y resident of vj.llage ^^'.Kasturi,, P.O. Nagarnar, Tehsil Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar. • ..* •. •* ?''-7 1. Central Government Industrial Tribunal- Cum-LaboLTr Court', Amanpur, jabalpur. •.. Resporidents Petition under Art. 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India for a writ in the nature of certiorari, mandamus, etc. etc. ! .^^L-iid- HSGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 1988 of 1991 Petitionej Bastar Kshetriya Gramia Jagdalpur Versus Respondents Bhajendra Natli Mafhew & anofher SB: Hontile Mr. Justice Satisli K. Agaiiiotal, J Shri PrafuU Bharat, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri P. S. Koshy, Advocate wifh Shri Vinod Deshiaukh, Advocate foi the respondent No. 1. QRDER (17th November, 2006){ The foUowiug order of tlie Court is passed by Justice Satish K. I. The present writ petition impugns the award dated 19.11.199p (Anaexure P/15) and fhe order dated 26.4.1991 (Annexiire P/18), whereby the appUcation offhe petitioaer for setting aside ex-parte award dated 19.11.1990 was rejected. 2. I have gone through fhe anvard dated 19.11.1990 and the order dated 26.4.1991. On perusal ofthe award, it appear-s that the Tribunal has not considered the letter dated 30.9.1983 of the respondent No.2/eiaployee and the subsequent letter dated 30.9.1983 issued by fhe Branch Manager, despite noticuig the said facts as i^corded iii para. 5 ofthe award. 3. . Havuig regard to the facts aud circuinstaaces of the case, the award dated 19.11.1990 aad the orderdated 26.4.1991 are set aside aad-the inatter is reinitted back to fhe Tribunat for • •^KSB: hiiikur adjudication ~~ of fhe dispute afresh after affordmg proper opporturuty of hearing to toofb. fhe parties. The Tribiinal is - furttier directed to consider aud dispose of ttie application withiii a period of tltree inonfhs from. the date of receipt of the copy of fhis order. — 4. The parties are at libeity to file aU fhe relevant docum.ents before the Tribunal. The parties are furfher directed to reiiiaiu present before the Tribunal on 4th Deceiaber, 2006. 5. Accordiagly this petition is altowed. The office is directed to send ftie.copy of a order along wifh. papers of fhe case to the Tribunal, forfb.with. . Satish K.Agiiihotri Judge liiiaiBfligiisa -•?• 'lfe