1 cp-304/10 Ash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 304 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri C.K. Thomas i/by C.K. Thomas Associates for the Petitioners. Shri A.I. Patel, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 14TH DECEMBER, 2010 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners. The first contention of the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners is that there is a breach of the direction issued by this Court under the judgment and order dated 30th July, 2009. 2. It is not in dispute that the Petitioners were permitted to admit the students. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners submitted that only 34 students could be admitted due to delay. Another grievance is that in the admission notice, the 2 cp-304/10 Respondents have stated that the admission granted to the students will be subject to the final decision of the Special Leave Petition. 3. It is obvious that there is no breach committed by the Respondents of the order of this Court. The Petitioners were in fact permitted to admit the students. The declaration that the admission to the institution of the Petitioners will be subject to the final decision of the Special Leave Petition pending in the Supreme Court is essentially for protection of the students. Hence, no case is made out for proceeding under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The Petition is disposed of. (A.S.OKA, J)