:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.590 OF 2006 SUMMONS NO.590 OF 2006 SUMMONS NO.590 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 485 OF 2006 SUIT NO. 485 OF 2006 SUIT NO. 485 OF 2006 Raj Petroleum Products Ltd. ..Plaintiffs V/s A.M. Roy ..Defendants Shri C.D. Patel i/b A.S. Dayal and Company for the Plaintiff Ms Sunita Pandey i/b L.J. Law for the Defendant CORAM ; A.A.SAYED, J. DATE : 4TH MAY, 2009 P.C. 1. This Chamber Summons is taken out by the defendant to condone the delay of 38 days in filing the Vakalatnama and to take on file the Vakalatanama on behalf of the defendant. Additional affidavit dated 24-03-2009 is also tendered across the bar which, I am informed is served on the plaintiffs. There is no reply filed by the plaintiffs to the affidavit in support of Chamber Summons or the additional affidavit. 2. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in :2: support of Chamber Summons and additional affidavit, the Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) subject to costs of Rs. 500/- to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiffs. 3. The learned Counsel for the defendant states that the Vakalatanama will be filed by 07-05-09. Statement is accepted. 4. Chamber Summons is disposed of. ( A.A. SAYED, J.) A.A. SAYED, J.) A.A. SAYED, J.)