K HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUREAT BILASPURieHHATTISGARH lit SINGLEBENCH:HON'BLESHRIS.R.NAYAK,C.J. WR|TPEnTIOMN0.13450F2005 PETITIONER (Originai plaintiff) Suresh Kumar Jagatramka Aged about 50 years S/o. Shri Banwari lal jagatramka :. Resident of Gandhi Chowk, v Raigarh (C.G.) Versus RESPQNDENT (Original Defendant) VtjaySaraf,S/o SagarmalSaraf R/o Not knOwn, Advbcate, District Bar AssQciation, Raigarh (C.G.) J' Present: Shri Ankit Pandey, leamed epunsel for th& petitioner. (ORA1.0R B)i: (Passedon 05thtlWay, 2fflQ6) ThegrieyanseiifthepetitjQRer^^plaintJfFisthattheapplfeation made by him under Section 151 offe|?£;Eodjrect the Bar Council of India, Chhattisgarh State|Unit to take action against the respondent —Acfyocate for alteged professiQnal misconduct;' has been unjystly rejected; by ths trial Court. There is no need fortheGourtlo examine whether there is pnma faae miSGonduct on the part ef the respbndent - Advocate pr not, at this stage. SufRce it fo statetHat jf in the apinion of the petitioner^ plaintiff, the respondent— Advocate has pomraitted any professional1 misconduct, he can bring Xthe notiee of the Bar Council of India^ ChhaSisgOT State: jUnit.' The vsffit petition <is, tlierefore, dismiisseci,|i '^•eserving liberty as Jridicatedabo'ire. iNo^;6Sts.7——-' Sd/- .. - Chief Justice