THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 26984 OF 2008 ORDER: ( Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) 1. This writ petition is filed against the order dated 2nd December, 2008 passed in O.A.No. 9983 OF 2008 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad. 2. The petitioners filed O.A. inter alia contending that they were appointed as S.G. Teachers after due process of selection on various dates and discharging the duties without any complaints whatsoever for a period of 4 to 10 years respectively as Mandal Resource Persons. While so, by Notification dated 15-11-2008 the Government has notified for fresh appointment to the post of Mandal Resource Persons without considering the petitioners past experience and services rendered by them. 3. The Tribunal after considering the submissions made by the parties thought it fit to issue notice before admission. The Tribunal has not passed an order on merits inasmuch as there is no determination or conclusion of the matter on contest and the matter is pending before the Tribunal and it is the Tribunal to adjudicate the matter on merits. 4. Without going into the merits of the case, we are of the considered opinion that let the Tribunal pass a reasoned order after giving opportunity to both sides. We do not find any flaw in Tribunal issuing notice before admission. 5. In R. Manjula Vs. Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue ( Service), Hyderabad while dealing with a similar situation, this Court held as follows: “This Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India would not normally interfere with the discretionary orders passed by the Tribunal – Grant of an interlocutory order or refusal there of is within the discretion of the Tribunal. This Court would not interfere with such discretion exercised by the Tribunal with regard to the interlocutory orders, unless it is established that passing such interlocutory order or refusal there of had resulted in an irreversible situation resulting in manifest injustice, it would not be appropriate for this Court to entertain any writ petition only for the purpose of granting an interim order during the pendency of the main proceedings before the Tribunal. Suffice it to observe, interference of this Court on the exercise of discretion by the Tribunal at an interlocutory stage is not a matter of course”. 6. We do not find any error in the order of the Tribunal in issuing notice before admission. However, we direct the Tribunal to dispose of the O.A.No.9983 of 2008 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ____________________________ Justice Ghulam Mohammed ______________________________ Justice B. Seshasayana Reddy 11th December, 2008. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 26984 OF 2008 11th December, 2008.