BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Sixth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S.PALANIVELU CRL OP(MD) No.12587 of 2011 RAMESH ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE LAW AND ORDER, FORT POLICE STATION, TRICHY DT CR NO. 1156/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.JOEL PAUL ANTONY Advocate For Respondent : A.RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 448 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.1156 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was charged under Sections 294(b), 448 and 506(ii) IPC. He further submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned additional Public Prosecutor would submit that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence and the investigation is considerably over and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence and the investigation is considerably over and even though the petitioner was not arrested neither he interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Trichy and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 am., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 26/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, TRICHY 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE LAW AND ORDER, FORT POLICE STATION, TRICHY DT 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. A.JOEL PAUL ANTONY Advocate SR.No.33237 GH : 28.09.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12587 of 2011 Date :26/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/