SBCMA No.766/2008 Krishan Lal Vs. Phoosa Ram 1 SBCMA No.766/2008 Krishan Lal Vs. Phoosa Ram DATE OF ORDER : - 19.1.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Trilok Joshi,for the appellant. Mr.Rakesh Arora, for the respondent. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the respondent raised objection that the appeal itself has become infrcutuous, rather say, the injunction application itself has become infructuous in view of the fact that appellant sought only relief of not making any entry in the revenue record by the revenue authorities in pursuance of the Will dated 23rd March, 2004, but the mutation has already been affected and name of the respondent has been entered as Khatedar in the revenue record. It is also submitted that the relief of injunction could not have been granted and the same has not rightly been granted by the trial court because of the reason that in the entire injunction application, the appellant nowhere stated SBCMA No.766/2008 Krishan Lal Vs. Phoosa Ram 2 that he was ever in possession of the property nor he stated that he is in possession of the land in question. After perusing the facts mentioned in the injunction application, I do not find any merit in this appeal and the same is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-