CiL'' 'iw IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 72007 ITITIONER .••• iSPONDENTS ^s^- ...•-••"•'hOV\'^Y--"" ../ ^ ^Sfat. Nidhi Dwivedi W/o Shri Ainit ••^^.Qr '• Gupta aged about 40 years, Lecturer. Government Hieher Secondary School, Camp-1, Bhilai, District, Durg (C.G.) VERSUS ^ State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Public Instructions, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) District Education ofBcer, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) [T PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA v^^..^ ,rt-" ipetitioner begj;o^subn'ul-a^^" ^' ;' •- HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATtSH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. Petitioner WRFT PETmON (S.) hto.209 OF 2007 Surya Naraydn Tiwari ' versus Respondenits : State ofChhattisgoyhImd others I WRTT PCTTTION (S.lNo.Zli OF 2007 Petitioner [ : 5haineshwar Singh Thakur •-<'- yersys Re^ondents State of Chhattisgarh ond others Petitioner WRTT PETmON (S.) No.212 OF 20)7 Ravindra Kumar Patkar Respondents Petitioner versus State of Chhattisgou*h and others WRTTPEnTION fS.lNo.213 Cff 2007 Smt. Nidhi Dwivedi wrsus State of Gihatt'isgarh and others 4nd WRTT PETTTION CS.) No.248 OF 2007 Petitioners : Chandradiekhar Patel ond others versys Respondents State of Chhatt'isgarh <md o'ttiers Present : Mr,l Anupam Dubey, counsel and AAr. R.S. Patiel, counsel for the ji..!. . . : •: [S). Mr»Arvind bubey, Panet Lawyer for the State/respondents. OR 0 E R 0*ossed on Ihis t8t1' Day of Jonuary, 2007) ieomed counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respoiidents jointly submit that the facts and question of luw ! i , ' •' involved in rt+ie presentwrit (wtitions are squarely covered by -the ! . . ' ' ' . - decision of :this Court in the case of yaslwwit Kum€W Bharadweij vs. Mwric^Hil Cwywvtion, Owy and mwfhw1'. 2. For -the aforementioned reasons, -Hiese wri+ petitions are disposed 1 4.-- of in terms of the clecision of 1+iis Court in -the matter- of yti^iwwft l&imar Bhoradvwj (Supra), subject to verificdtion of the fact as to whether -thel petjtioners have ocquired B.EdyB.TJ. Certificatesat their own expense^ as per -the circulars da-ted 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 ond further wAether -they have been paid two advonce increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of -this order be placed on the record of the connected writ petition^; Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotti Judge 1 2006CH)AU>JR-C696