HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.1839 of 2000 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. Though served, none appeared for the respondent herein. The appellant herein is the maternal great grand father who filed this appeal under Section 47 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (for brevity ‘the Act’) inter alia assailing the correctness of the partial refusal in regard to the quantum of guardianship as to the property as per the orders in G.W.O.P.No.47 of 2000 on the file of the Court of District Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam, dated 29/04/2000. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the respondent herein has filed the present OP under Section 7 and 9 of the Act for the custody and guardianship of the minor child and also the property. Admittedly, the child was born on 28/06/1992. Thereafter, the mother died on 04/08/1994 allegedly under suspicious circumstances. It is this circumstance, which has given raise to the filing of the present OP. The same was contested by the appellant herein. The Court below has taken up the said petition along with other connected petitions filed and ultimately, partly allowed the said petition appointing the father to the extent of the properties are concerned and the appellant as regards the custody of the person of the minor child Nutakki Vimala Anusha. Hence, the appeal. Having heard the learned counsel and also on perusal of the material on record and especially, in view of the fact that the minor child is going to attain majority very soon i.e., hardly in six months, any order at this juncture and intervention in regard to the arrangement made would only give raise to further complications and would not be in the interest of minor. In the circumstances, we do not find any justification to interfere with the finding made by the Court below in regard to the properties and custody of the minor child. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J ___________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 29th January, 2010 SKM