HICttt CQURT QF CHHATnSGARH ; BILASPUR Writ PetitionfSINo. 1717 of 2009 Petitioner Suiyanafh Kushwaha, ^ed about 43 years, S/o Muiuulal Kushwaha, presenfly posted as Revenue Inspector, Rajaswa Nirakshaa Maadal, Ghumka, District Rajnandgaon, ClLhattisgarh — Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. State of ChbattisgaFh, fihrough the Secretaiy, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) The Under SeGretaiy, Goveminen.t Qf GMiattisgarU, Departinent of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) The ConuiussiQDfir, Laud Records, Raipur, Gllliattisgarii. The Colleetor, Districf, Rajnaodgaon, CIih.a.ttisgarh. Tlie ColleGfor, Chliattisgarii. The ;Depuly Conunissioner, Land Records, Raipur, Chllattisgailt. District Narayanpur, (Writ Petitiou Uitder Ariicle 226/ 227 of fhe Gonstitutiou of Iiidia) (SB: Hon'blc Stui SatisK K. Agnihotri J.) Shri Amrito D£ ,Advocate fisr tfae petitioner. Shri Yasliwaat Sin.gti Thakur, Depuly Advocate Geneial with Ms Smita Ghai, Paael La-wyer for the respondents. ORDER (Passed on this 7th day of May, 2009) 1. 2. 3. Thakur Sbri Yashwaut Smgh Tbakur, Deputy Advocate Qencral wlfh Ms Sinita Ghai, Panel Lawyer appearmg for the respoadents submits fh.at fhe impugned order dated 13tb Februaiy, 2009 is not an order of transfer but it is simply au adjustment for specific purpose of siuvey pf Abujllinaad area. The pefitioaer is drawmghis saIatyfTOmtheorigmalpIaceofpostmg. , In view of ttie foregQingT'&ccoFdmg to leamed counselAppeaTmg for fhe petitioner, riothiug sumves, for adjudication. The petition is accordiagly dKposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge