ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 239 OF APPEAL NO. 239 OF APPEAL NO. 239 OF 1999 1999 1999 WITH WITH WITH FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 290 OF 2000 APPEAL NO. 290 OF 2000 APPEAL NO. 290 OF 2000 WITH WITH WITH FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 305 OF 2000 APPEAL NO. 305 OF 2000 APPEAL NO. 305 OF 2000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.A.P.Kulkarni i/by Mr. A.A.Kumbhakoni for the appellants. Mr. M.D.Parab, Advocate for respondent No.1 to 3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 13th September, 2007. : 13th September, 2007. : 13th September, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. Not on board. Taken on board. 1. The parties have arrived at to settle the dispute that resulted into the consent terms dated 13/09/2007. The same has been signed by the respective parties and their advocates. There is no objection of any kind to the identification, signature ( 2 ) and authorization. 2. The consent terms marked "X", taken on record. 3. In view of paragraph 11, the appellants are not pressing the appeal against respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6 in First Appeal No. 239 of 1999, respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in First Appeal No. 305 of 2000 and respondent No. 2 in First Appeal No. 290 of 2000. The learned counsel on instructions, on behalf of contesting respondents has no objection to the same. However, it is made clear that the order on this consent terms, is subject to liberty in so far as the respondents or parties against whom the appellants are not pressing the present appeal. 4. Appellant No.1, 2 and ( 3 ) respondents are present in the court. Both the advocates make a statement that the consent terms have been explained to the parties and they understood the same. 5. In view of this, the first appeals are disposed of in view of this consent terms, accordingly. 5. In view of this, the Civil Application No. 1954 of 2006 is disposed of as not pressed. 6. In view of the compromise, the Civil Application No. 1497 of 2006 is also disposed of as not pressed. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]