1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2661 OF 2009 Satish @ Ramdas Hanumantrao Bhosale Versus State of Maharashtra and another *** Mr. N. S. Ghanekar, Advocate for the Applicants. Mrs. B. R. Khekale, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** 1. Heard learned counsel for the accused/ applicant and learned A.P.P. By order dated 12th August, 2009 interim protection was granted in favour of the accused/ applicant with attendance. Learned A.P.P. informs there is no breach in the terms of attendance. The vehicle belonging to the complainant was taken away allegedly by force, committing broad day dacoity. The contention of the accused/ applicant is, he had monetary transactions with the complainant and it was with the sweet will of the complainant, the vehicle was handed over to him. Considering the nature of controversies and status of the respective parties, the interim protection dated 12th August, 2009 is extended. However, 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. inspite of attendance twice i.e. on Sunday and Thursday, it should be Sunday between 09.00 a.m. to 11.00 a.m. till filing of the charge sheet. Application disposed of. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:05/09/2009. ans/2661