IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4226 of 2011 Date of Decision : March 09, 2011. Jasbir Singh and another .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.S.L.Chander Shekhar, Advocate for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners seek a prohibitory direction to “restrain the respondents not to interfere into the peaceful possession of the petitioners who are tenants in the property for the last more than 50 years......”. A further direction has also been sought to pay damages to the petitioners for causing loss/damages to the articles lying in their shops and/or which have been stolen/taken away forcibly by the respondents. Amongst the respondents against whom the petitioners have made allegations are the private respondents, namely, respondent Nos.5 to 8. The only allegation against the official respondents is that the private respondents are taking law in their hands in connivance and the alleged collusion of the official respondents. C.W.P.No .4226 of 2011 2 There is a long history regarding the title dispute, besides the debatable status of the petitioners' as tenants. The writ petition is full of seriously disputed questions of facts which cannot be effectively adjudicated upon by a writ Court. The same is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the Civil Court or any other appropriate forum. Dasti. March 09, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE