IN THE HON'BLE HJGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.t W.P. (227) N0. 1*A^^ / 2010 S.B. ^ } ^t "'pt''.Kwf PETITIONER/ APPELLANTNO.l A0 ..-•%•' .^w^ /x\..^y ^^^ \~ ^^••^N. sv'y / .^ ~ VERSUS RESPONDENTS '^^'^. <f»v'. -" ~- "'.S^A. Gautam Chand Duggad S/o Late Shri Himmatlal, aged about 54 years, R/o Pratapdev Ward, Jagdalpur, Distt.-Bastar (C.G.). (Since the appeUant no.2 namely Smt. Chunnibai W/o Late Shri Himmatlal in appeal preferred against the order dated 04.06.2002 has already died, she has not been impleaded as party.) c- 1. The Board of Revenue, Bench atRaipur (C.G.j. 2. The Commissioner, Bastar Division, Jagdalpur , (C.G.). 3. The Collector, Bastar, Distt. - Bastar (C.G.). 4. The state of Chhattisgarh, Through - the Collector, Bastar, Disst.- Bastar (C.G.). 5. Smt. Annaipuma Shrivastava W/o Late Shri Ganesh Shrivastava, R/o Balaji ward, Jagdalpur, Distt.- Bastar (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA r ^' ^s< "^iFTRfq, ®fli'M41(c, rsKrll'yy ^.:lL^)..t^.:X^LC'a Sf^V '^B^ (ij*lf^»<^!) diiiu 'w K-A* ^TT 3n^?f ^»*ii^» ^dT Tumang SB : Hon'Me Shri Manindra Mohan ShrHwstava. J 05-04-2B10 Smt. Renu Kochar, counsel forthe Shri Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, Pan| advance cdpy. This petition underArUcle 227 the petitioner mainly aggrieved on before the Board of Revenue. In the order dated 4/06/2002 passed by the case no.1/A-4COOO-2001, an appeal mother before the Board of Revenue, also been placed on recorcl as Annexure though the appeal was filed in the year been decided. It has also been statsd have been misplaced on Interest of justice would be Bench at Raipur to expeditiously decide| Board of Revenue shall make alt endeavct limit of 4 months. Petitioner shall place ^ Revenue, on or before 20"' April2010. Wrth the aforesaid directton, the accouht petifion Connlmissioner, wals Bertch 20(12 account ofwhich |the appeal servW obi^[<r}41i 'tHTfcTf ^ Is^ei, <F<j-^R, ^? siRn siii^i kwtittoner. Pan^l Lawyer for respondent No.2 to 4, on ofth|B Constitufcn of India has been fited by of delay in deciding appeal pending i, it has been stated that against the Conn|missioner, Bastar Dh/ision, Jagdalpur in WE|S prefeired by the petittoner and his at Raipur. A copy ofthe appeal has \P12. Grievance of the petitioner is that !, it has remained pending and has not fn the petitton that records of the case is not being decided. in directing the Board of Revenue, |1he appeal filed by the petitioner. The eav((ur to decide the appeal within an outer copy of this order befbre ttie Board of peption is finally dispossd ofat this slage. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judee ^i'S^'E^frq".^TT?nT, EFr'-T'ir-'it.^-^i.-vi t7- -.2/20! O—1,00,000.