CWP No. 15873 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CWP No. 15873 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.10.2011 Satbir Singh ........ Petitioner Versus HPGCL and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. J K Goel, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for respondents No. 1 and 2 Mr. Manoj Chahal, Advocate for respondent No. 3 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) CM No. 11569 of 2011 CM is allowed and replication is taken on record. Main case This common order shall dispose of Civil Writ Petition Nos. 15873, 15824, 15825, 15827, 15839 and 15951 of 2010 as issue involved in all these petitions is identical. However, the facts are being taken from Civil Writ Petition CWP No. 15873 of 2010 (O&M) 2 No. 15873 of 2010. Learned counsel for respondents No. 1 and 2 pointed out that in pursuance to the charge-sheet, punishment has been imposed vide order dated 27.07.2009 (P10). The petitioner has filed an appeal against the said order. The said appeal stands decided but a copy of the order has not been supplied to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents undertakes to supply a copy of the order, vide which, the appeal has been decided, within two weeks from today. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh petition on the same cause of action as also challenging the order, vide which, the appeal against the order of punishment has been decided. Learned counsel for respondents No. 1 and 2 clarified that in some of these cases, the appeal has yet to be decided. If that is so, the respondents are directed to decide the same within two weeks from today and communicate the order to the petitioner immediately thereafter in order to enable him to challenge the same in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 13.10.2011 mohan