1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CAO NO. 26/2010 AND MCA (review) ST. NO. 17521/2009 IN WP NO. 3463/2004 ( Suresh Ramdas Gite vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ) with CAO NO. 27/2010 AND MCA (review) ST. NO. 17519/2009 IN WP NO. 5433/2004 ( Vinayak Ramdas Gite vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & F.M. REIS, JJ. APRIL 23, 2010. Heard Ms. Rane, Advocate holding for Shri Parsodkar, learned counsel for the applicants. The applications are for condonation of delay in filing MCA. On the last date we had communicated to the learned counsel that we would also like to examine the merits of the controversy. Accordingly, the learned counsel had sought time and has advanced arguments today. The contention is, old documents right from the year 1917 though produced, have not been considered and reliance has been placed on affidavit/ evidence of certain persons who were not relatives. Our attention is also invited to the representation filed before the Scrutiny Committee as per the letter of Scrutiny Committee dated 29.06.2004 to state that the persons whose statements are recorded are not relatives. The perusal of order delivered by us on 17th 2 August 2009 shows that we have considered the old document of 1917 which revealed the entry as Bhat. The stenographer has while transcribing the order instead of writing the year 1917 has put the year 1970. That is obviously an error. In view of this old document, which has been accepted by the Scrutiny Committee and by us, it is obvious that subsequent documents in which the entry Thakur has appeared, lost its relevance. It is not the case of the applicants that the arguments advanced by Shri Choudhari, learned counsel for the petitioners have not been considered. It is, therefore, clear that the issues presented to this Court have been looked into and answered. As no case is made out for review, no orders on application for condonation of delay are necessary. Both the applications are rejected. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.