IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.828 of 2011 Bishwakarma Poddar Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 2. 24.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. The learned counsel for the petitioner instead of adopting the judicial hierarchy, beginning his prayer right from the learned Lower Court as provided under Chapter (XXXIV) of the Cr. P.C., directly invoke the jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Cr. P.C. It is settled principle of law that where an alternative remedy is available, the jurisdiction of a writ should not be invoked in a routine matter. As such, I do not see the case wherein writ jurisdiction is attractive. Petition is rejected. However, it is advisable, if so, to the petitioner to pray before the learned lower Court/Collector for release and the learned Lower Court/Collector without being influenced by the order impugned will pass appropriate order in accordance with law. The prayer should be decided within the span of one month time from the date of filing of the petition along with the order impugned. Till disposal of the petition, no step should be taken for auction of the truck. Kamlesh (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)