IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28165 of 2009 PAWAN CHOUDHARY . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3/ 18-Aug-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Nobody appears on behalf of the informant although name of his counsel is appearing in the cause list. By order dated 26.11.2008 (Annexure-1) petitioner’s prayer for bail was rejected even after noticing that he is in custody since 22.04.2004. However, trial was directed to be expedited and liberty was granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer in case the trial is not concluded within a reasonable time. While hearing this application for bail on 16.09.2009, learned counsel for the informant assured this Court that he will get himself examined and produce other witnesses so as to expedite the trial. In that view of the matter, this case was adjourned for three months but could be taken up only now. In has been submitted that neither the 2 informant has got examined himself in the trial nor there is any progress in the trial. Considering all the facts and circumstances and inordinate delay being caused by the informant, prayer for bail is allowed. Let petitioner, PAWAN CHOUDHARY be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC No.II, Khagaria in S.C. No.189 of 2004 arising out of Parbatta P.S.Case No. 74/2001 One of the bailors must be a close relation of the petitioner. In case, the petitioner misuses the privilege of bail in any manner the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail on the ground of misuse. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)