IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 139 OF 2006 Rahul Motors Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Petitioners V/s. Tata Engineering And Locomotive Co. Limited & Anr. ... Respondents. Mr. Gajanan N. Savagave for the Petitioners Mr. Mahesh Jethmalani, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Avinash Joshi, Mr. Vipul Bilve and Mr. Dhaivat D. Mehta instructed by M/s. Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe for Respondent No. 1 Mrs. Usha V. Kejriwal, Additional Public Prosecutor, for Respondent No. 2. CORAM: KSHITIJ R. VYAS, C.J. DATE: APRIL 21, 2006. P.C.:- In my opinion, the petition is required to be rejected as it is at a premature stage. The learned Magistrate has only issued the process. The petitioners can voice their grievance before him. With these observations, the petition is rejected. CHIEF JUSTICE