HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.24623 of 2011 Date : 2-9-2011 Between : G. Rama Subbamma .. Petitioner And The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Circle No.14, Kukatpally, Hyderabad Represented by its Deputy Commissioner .. Respondent Counsel for petitioner : Sri Kasa Jaganmohan Reddy Counsel for respondent : Dr.Y. Padmavathi, Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to set-aside notice No.113/UC/W.No.117/Cir.14/WZ/GHMC/11 dated 26- 8-2011. The petitioner claims to be the owner of plot No.46, Phase I & II of KPHB Colony, Kukatpally. She has obtained building permission vide proceedings No.G2/178/BA/574/2008-09 dated 29-11-2008 for construction of stilt + four upper floors over the said plot. By the impugned notice issued under Section 636 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act,1955 (for short "the Act"), the Deputy Commissioner of the respondent-Corporation has informed one Sri Subba Reddy that he has unauthorisedly constructed cellar + ground + four upper floors over plot No.234/6, EWS, Phase I & II, KPHB, Kukatpally. The petitioner pleaded that even though the impugned notice pertains to a different plot altogether, the same was delivered at her site bearing plot No.46 and that there is a threat of demolition of her premises. The petitioner stated that no prior notice has been issued to her in respect of plot No.46. The learned Standing counsel representing the respondent-Corporation, on instructions, submitted that a fresh notice will be issued to the petitioner in respect of plot No.46, Phase I & II, KPHB colony, Kukatpally. Having regard to the above submission of the learned Standing Counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent not to interfere with the building situated in plot No.46, Phase I & II, KPHB colony, Kukatpally, unless notices under Sections 452 and 636 of the Act are issued in respect thereof. As a sequel, WPMP No.30255/2011 is disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy Date : 2-9-2011 AM