( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.109 OF 2008 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.109 OF 2008 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.109 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.2235 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.2235 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.2235 OF 2007 Inderjit Kapur .. Petitioner V/s M.T.N.L. .. Respondents And Vikram Inderjit Kapur .. Proposed Petitioner WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.110 OF 2008 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.110 OF 2008 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.110 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.2236 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.2236 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.2236 OF 2007 Inderjit Kapur .. Petitioner V/s M.T.N.L. .. Respondents And Vikram Inderjit Kapur .. Proposed Petitioner Mr.U.L.Shah, Advocate for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : J.N.PATEL & J.N.PATEL & J.N.PATEL & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. R.G.KETKAR, JJ. R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 30TH MARCH, 2009. DATE : 30TH MARCH, 2009. DATE : 30TH MARCH, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. These applications have been filed by the legal heir Mr.Vikram Inderjit Kapur for condonation of delay in filing the application for bringing him on record in place of the deceased petitioner. It is the case of the Applicant that he forgot to inform about the death of the petitioner as he was not aware of such ( 2 ) procedure that the legal heirs and representatives of the petitioner have to be brought on record. The Applicant has shown his ignorance in this regard that such a procedure is required to be adopted. 2. We made a specific query to the learned Counsel for the Applicant whether the Applicant who wants to be substituted in place of the deceased petitioner is the sole legal heir of the deceased petitioner, the learned Counsel for the Applicant states that the Applicant has taken over all the liabilities of the deceased petitioner who is his father, and the other heirs do not propose to join as petitioners and prosecute the petition. 3. In our view it will be appropriate if the Applicant joins the other legal heirs and representatives as Respondents/ non-applicants in these matters so that they can be heard before any orders are passed. 4. Liberty to join other legal heirs and representatives of the deceased Inderjit Kapur as proposed non-applicants/Respondents. 5. Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of one week from today and the newly added Respondents be served by hamdust. ( 3 ) 6. Both the Chamber Summons to stand over for hearing and final disposal on 27th April, 2009. (J.N.PATEL, J.) (J.N.PATEL, J.) (J.N.PATEL, J.) (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (R.G.KETKAR, J.)