: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1187 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1187 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1187 OF 2008 WITH WITH WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4683 OF 1998 WRIT PETITION NO.4683 OF 1998 WRIT PETITION NO.4683 OF 1998 Shraddha Sadanand Wagle ...Petitioner/Applicant. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.S.M.Railkar , adv. for the Petitioner/Applicant. Mr.S.R.Nargolkar , adv. for the Respondents. CORAM: Bilal Nazki CORAM: Bilal Nazki CORAM: Bilal Nazki & J.H.Bhatia,JJ J.H.Bhatia,JJ J.H.Bhatia,JJ. DATE : 20th November, 2008. DATE : 20th November, 2008. DATE : 20th November, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. For the reasons given in the application, writ petition is restored to the file. Civil Application for restoration is accordingly allowed. 2. Petitioner/Applicant is aggrieved by an order passed by the Sub-Registrar on 18-1-1998, who came to conclusion that the document registered in favour of the petitioner/applicant had been undervalued, therefore, demand of deficit stamp duty was made. This order had been made after issuing show-cause notice to the petitioner/applicant. This Court in this proceeding can not decide question of fact whether the property registered was properly valued or undervalued. Therefore, in our view : 2 : writ petition is not maintainable at all. Besides, the petitioner/applicant has a remedy of appeal before the appropriate authority under Section 32B of the Stamp Act. Time to file appeal is already lapsed. However, since the petitioner/applicant was pursuing this remedy for ten years, we allow him two weeks to file appeal before the appropriate authority. (Bilal Nazki, J.) (Bilal Nazki, J.) (Bilal Nazki, J.) (J.H.Bhatia, J.) (J.H.Bhatia, J.) (J.H.Bhatia, J.)