In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 52 of 2009 (O&M) Darshan Singh ..... Petitioner vs Mahesh Kumar ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. S. K. Sharma Budhladawale, Advocate for the petitioner. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition is to the order passed by the court below whereby the application filed by the petitioner for clarification of the order dated 27.10.2007 was dismissed finding that there is no ambiguity in the order. In a suit filed by the respondent for recovery on the basis of a pronote, the learned court below, while granting leave to defend to the petitioner, directed him to furnish security to the extent of 50% of the amount claimed in the suit. The amount claimed in the suit is Rs. 2,75,200/- i.e. Rs. 1,60,000/- as principal amount and Rs. 1,15,200/- as interest. The application for clarification was filed with the plea that the learned court below has not explained as to what kind of security is to be furnished. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner be allowed to furnish bank guarantee of 50% of the amount claimed in the suit i.e. Rs. 1,40,000/-. As the petitioner has fairly submitted that he will furnish security in the form of Bank guarantee of Rs. 1,40,000/- in terms of the order passed by the learned court below on 27.10.2007, the same may be accepted by the learned court below. It is made clear that bank guarantee furnished by the petitioner shall remain alive till the decision of the suit. The petition is disposed of accordingly. 8.1.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge