THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.28831 of 2010 DT.22.11.2010 Between: Smt.Mariyala Yellavva … Petitioner And The Collector, Medak District at Sangareddy and others. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Raj Kumar Rudra Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP for Revenue The Court made the following ORDER: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the purported inaction of respondent Nos.1 to 3 in dealing with the petitioner’s representation for deletion of the name of respondent No.4 from the record of rights and entering her name, as illegal and arbitrary. A perusal of the representation, dated 17.08.2010, made by the petitioner to respondent No.3, with copies marked to respondent Nos.1 and 2, shows that there is a serious dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.4 over the land admeasuring Acs.2.38 guntas in Survey No.436 of Toopran Village and Mandal, Medak District. It is further revealed that respondent No.4 has got his name entered in the record of rights. The petitioner sought for deletion of the said name and entering her name in the record of rights. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue has pointed out and in my opinion correctly, that the petitioner has failed to avail the remedy of appeal before respondent No.2, if she felt aggrieved by the alteration of entries in the record of rights. Under Section 5(5) of the A.P.Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (for short ‘the Act’), the person aggrieved by alternation of entries in the revenue records is entitled to file an appeal and also avail further remedy of revision under Section 9 of the Act, if he is aggrieved by any order passed in such appeal. The petitioner failed to avail these statutory remedies and instead, approached respondent No.3 to reverse his own decision. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed, without going into the merits of the case, with liberty to the petitioner to avail the statutory remedies as indicated above. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.36763 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) Date: 22.11.2010 VGB