IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8147 of 2009 SHYAM BIHARI MANJHI @ SHYAM BIHARI DHANGARD, Son of Dhanesh Dhangard,resident of village Dhokraha,Dhangar Toli,P.S.-Majhaulia, District-West Champaran. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 08-04-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Ownership of the seized wine is disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that it was seized from a hut situated in an orchard, but no so much so liberty can be given to an accused to act in his way, which can be deprecated by the court, even 35 litres of manufactured wine was recovered from the petitioner’s hut. Is it possible for the police to hand over a copy of the seizure list when the petitioner fled away from the hut? However, if the quantity of the wine can be taken for giving him any relief for bail, that can be sought from the trial court. Accordingly, this petition for anticipatory bail is rejected. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )