IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No. : 24077 of 2000 BETWEEN: Smt. B.Rajeshwari, W/o. Late B.S.R.Deakshitulu, R/o. D.No. 16/65, Sarakatta Street, Produttur Post and Mandal, Cuddapah District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep. by Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad 2 The A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep. by Regional Manager, Cuddapah Region, Cuddapah .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in rejecting the case of the petitioner for the post of for appointment as cleaner/Shramik vide proceedings No. DSP/876(14)/2000-RM'C', Cuddapah Region dated 10-11-2000 as illegal, unjust and consequently direct the respondent herein to consider the case of the petitioner for the post of Cleaner/Shramik or in any suitable post on compassionate grounds forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner :MR.S.M.SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondents : SMT.W.V.S.RAJESWARI The Court made the following : ORDER : It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent-Corporation that during t he pendency of this writ petition, the petitioner was appointed as a Conductor in the service of the Corporation. In that view of the matter, there is no need to examine the question of granting the relief as prayed for in this writ petition. If the petitioner is appointed, it is open for the respondent-Corporation to continue her as per the terms of appointment. The writ petition shall stand disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 12th November 2008 ajr