IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 1ST OCTOBER 2010 / 9TH ASWINA 1932 RP.No. 757 of 2010(A) ------------------------------ (THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.18003/2010 DATED 07/07/2010) .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENT NO.1 & 2 IN W.P.(C ).NO.18003/2010: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CORPORATION OF KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KOLLAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, KOLLAM CORPORATION, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHAN DAS, S.C. RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 3 & 4 IN W.P.(C).NO.18003/2010: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. J.DEVAKI, CHAITHRAM, THOTTAMUKATHKIZHAKKATHIL, KAIKULANGARA, NORTH WARD NO.47, RAMESWARAM NAGAR, KOLLAM-12. 2. G.PADMAKARAN, PADAMAVASANTHAM VEEDU, KAIKULANGARA NORTH WARD NO.47, RAMESWARAM NAGAR, KOLLAM. 3. P.VENUGOPAL, MELPILAMKEEZHU KAIKULANGARA NORTH WARD NO.47, RAMESWARAM NAGAR, KOLLAM -12. R1 BY ADV. SRI.T.O.XAVIER, R2 & R3 BY ADV. SRI. K.S. MANU. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/10/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- R.P.No.757 OF 2010 in W.P.(C)No.18003 Of 2010 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 1st DAY OF OCTOBER, 2010 O R D E R This Review Petition is filed by respondents 1 and 2 in the Writ Petition. In the judgment, this Court in paragraph No.6 directed that in terms of the decision taken in Exhibit P3, the 1st respondent will complete the construction within a period of three weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. The constructions mentioned therein is regarding a compound wall upto a length of 25 metres which was existing on the eastern side of the property of the writ petitioner. It was demolished at the instance of the Corporation for strengthening the existing drain and for reconstructing the damaged covering slabs. Exhibit P3 is the minutes of the meeting of the Standing Committee convened on 5.2.2010. 2. It is mentioned in the Review Petition that the Corporation is unable to effect the construction of the R.P.No.757/10 -2- compound wall as some people in the locality have objected the same stating that the construction if effected will be on a portion of a purambokku land. Reliance is placed on Annexure-I letter dt.6.7.2010 from the Taluk Surveyor. 3. The learned counsel for the Writ Petitioner submitted that the portion of the property is not a purambokku land and that there are no valid proceedings in that regard. 4. I am not satisfied that the grounds raised are sufficient to review the judgment. There is no apparent error in the judgment. Exhibit P3 decision already taken alone was directed to be implemented. In that view of the matter, the Review Petition is dismissed. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. dsn