IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.16174 of 2011 Date of Decision : September 01, 2011. HC Lakhwinder Singh and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.A.P.S.Shergill, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 10.7.1999 (Annexure P-1) reverting them to their substantive ranks and further a direction to the respondents to grant them the substantive ranks and similar benefits in terms of the order dated 16.6.2011 of the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Border Range, Amritsar. CWP No.16174 of 2011 [2] The petitioners relied upon an order dated 16.6.2011 (Annexure P-8) said to have been passed in the case of similarly placed persons on the recommendation of the Officer's Committee constituted by this Court vide order dated 4.3.2010 passed in CWP No.566 of 2010 (Ranjit Singh and others versus State of Punjab and others). During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the petitioners' case can also be considered and disposed of by the Officers' Committee within the time framed by this Court in Ranjit Singh and others' case (supra) and keeping in view the order dated 16.6.2011 (Annexure P-8). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. September 01, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE