1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4008/2010 Sou. Sharda Kamalakar Dudhpachare and another ...Versus... The State of Maharashtra, Through Department of Prohibition & Excise, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri S.A. Kalbande, Adv. for petitioners] [Shri A.M. Joshi, AGP for respondents] CORAM:- V.C. DAGA AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATED :- 14.12.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners. By this petition, the petitioners are challenging the constitutional validity of Clause 3 - (A) of Bombay Prohibition (Closure of Licence on Resolution of Gram Sabha or Representation of Voters in the Ward of Council) Order, 2008. Having examined the provision, we do not find any vice in the said provision. The provision reflects the policy of the State. Even otherwise the petitioners are estopped from challenging the same once having taken part in the voting process meant for the purpose. The writ petition is thus without any substance. The same is, therefore, dismissed in limini. No order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE SSW