IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 5718 of 2006 Date of Decision: 31.10.2006 Municipal Corporation Patiala ...Petitioner Versus Gurjant Singh ....Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta. Present: Shri Padam Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. JUDGMENT The challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the learned trial Court on 1.9.2006, whereby the plaintiff was allowed to amend the plaint so as to incorporate subsequent events. Since, the amendment allowed relates to subsequent events, the order cannot be said to be illegal. However, it is open to the petitioner to raise all objections, which may be available to it, in the written statement, to the amended plaint. Therefore, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the impugned order passed by the learned trial Court, which may warrant interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed. 31-10-2006 (HEMANT GUPTA) ds JUDGE