IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45019 of 2010 MANTU SAH @ RAJIV KUMAR SAH, SON OF KRISHNANADAN SAH, R/O VILLAGE-MAHARJGANJ, POLICE STATION-JAMUI, DISTRICT-JAMUI. …………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. ……………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 02/ 26.03.2011 Heard Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. At the outset, when this Court has made it clear that the petitioner will have two options either to deposit the compensation amount and get the anticipatory bail or in alternative move for regular bail, Mr. Singh has shown his inability to give any undertaking as with regard to the payment of the amount of loss of Rs. 2,56,896/-. In that view of the matter, this Court would hold that if the petitioner namely Mantu Sah @ Rajiv Kumar Sah is prepared to pay the amount of Rs. 2,56,896/- in five equal monthly installments and also gives an undertaking and deposits the first installment within a period of four weeks from today, he on surrendering and furnishing two bail bonds each of Rs. 10,000/- to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with P.S Case 2 No. 261 of 2010 would be enlarged on provisional bail for a period of one month and if the petitioner continues to deposit the remaining four monthly installments, his such provisional bail shall be kept on being extended on month to month basis till he would clear the entire amount. Any default on the part of the petitioner in the payment of the said amount will lead to immediate cancellation of his provisional bail. It however goes without saying that the deposit of the said amount by the petitioner shall be subject to the provisions of the Electricity Act 2003. With the aforesaid observation and direction this application is disposed of. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)