IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.15245 of 2011 Date of Decision : August 19, 2011. Sher Singh .....Petitioner versus The Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Deptt and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Balbir Singh Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter-reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioner seeks quashing of the orders dated 28.6.2010 and 26.11.2010 (Annexures P-2 & P-3) passed by respondents Nos.2 & 1, respectively, whereby the petition as well as appeal filed by the petitioner under the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 for CWP No.15245 of 2011 [2] declaring ownership over the land measuring 64 kanals 6 marlas situated in village Aakri, Tehsil Rajpura, District Patiala, have been dismissed. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the controversy involved in this case already stands answered against the petitioner vide a judgment dated 17.8.2011 passed in a bunch of writ petitions including CWP No.10911 of 2008 (Sukhdev Singh and others versus Gram Panchayat Thikriwal and others). For the reasons assigned in the aforesaid judgment in Sukhdev Singh's case (supra), I do not find any merit in this writ petition which is accordingly dismissed. August 19, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE