HEGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: EILASFU'R ‘ rii Femiom (S) No. 21 48 of 2098 Pa'wan Kumar, Sfo. Kushai Ram Velma, aged about 3O ygars Rio W‘age Amgaon Tam: Chhmkhadtm Jistrw Rajnandaon CG Versus , 1) State of Ch’natésgarh, hrouq‘n the ief Secrptary, Mantra!aya, Digs. Bhawan, Ralpur 2)‘ Raw Kumar S/o‘ Duiar Singh, Dewangan, Rb. Wage Bhorampur, Tahsi! Chhuékhadan; District Rajnandgaon (CG). bmt Rohni Bai W/o Rohit Verma Sarpanch Gram Pancnayat Bhorampur TRahSi hhwkhadan D;strict Ramandguor (CG) Bansm Prasad Mishra S/o Not Knovm lncharge—QpcretaQry, Pram Panr‘hayat Bhorampur ‘ [ahsiE Chhuikhadan ' D§strict Rajnandgaon Dhanesh S/o Dularu Qatnaml Bncmn Tahs Chhwkhadan Distnct Ray lawdgaan (CG, Tuia Ram Slo, Dadur Ralin,‘ Rio. Vinag Bidcri, Tahsil' Chhuik‘adan, D§stric Rajnandgaoril(CG). Ramkrishna 8/0. Jagdish, Rio. Viiiag Bhorampur, Tasil Chuiadan, District Rajnandgaan Resgondents CJVrit Pe’mion under Artic§e 226 of the Constitution i.) SB: Hon’ble Mr. Sat‘ish K. Agnihotri, J regent None fer the Detxtloner 8hr; Alok Baksh; Govt Advocate for the State ORAL ORDER (Passéd on 7" day of May. 2008 )' ’ The matter is caiieo‘ for hearing twice. On both occasions, nono appears nor , is any representation made on behait' of the petitioner. The petitioner ma not be interested in t mtt. 2) in View o the above, tne writ petition is dismissd for want of prosecution. W g ) Peiiticner t t Ch . g - u' e ln t e h hkh of ndia . F y he aer f e