IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- Crl. Misc. No. M – 13088 of 2010(O&M) Date of decision:- 3.8.2010 Suman ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present:- Mr. C.S.Bakshi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana. Gurdev Singh, J (oral) It has been submitted by learned State counsel that the prosecution has already concluded its evidence during the trial and the case is fixed for 5.8.2010 for recording the statements of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. In view of the statement of learned State counsel, it has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that he does not press this petition at this stage and that the trial Court be directed to decide the case expeditiously. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as not pressed for and the trial Court is directed to decide the case within three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. August 3, 2010 (Gurdev Singh) tripti Judge