IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15386 of 2010 Between: Neo Royal High School rep. by its Director N. Parwath Reddy ... PETITIONER a n d The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, State of Andhra Pradesh at Nampally, Hyderabad and others … RESPONDENTS ORDER: This writ petition has been filed by Neo Royal High School represented by its Director N. Parwath Reddy assailing the inaction of the respondents in considering the representation dated 15-06-2010. 2. The petitioner is an educational society registered under the Societies Registration Act. The petitioner society has been running a school in the name and style of Neo Royal High School for the last 12 years at the premises bearing No.10-1-78/51-58, I and II Floors of Vishnu Complex Bhagyanagar Colony, Lingojiguda, Saroornagar situated at Karmanghat X Road, Ranga Reddy district. While so, the respondent authorities are permitting opening of wine shop within 50 meters from the school. The petitioner – school submitted representation dated 15-06- 2010. There being no action on the said representation, the petitioner society approached this Court by invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 3. When the writ petition came up for admission, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise takes notice on behalf on respondents. 4. The limited grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents are not taking action on its representation raising objection with regard to the establishment of wine shop within the prohibited distance as provided under Rule 27 of the A.P. Excise (Grant of Licence of Selling by Bar and Condition of Licence) Rules, 2005. Since the representation is stated to be pending with the respondents, I deem it appropriate to direct the first respondent to consider the representation, dated 15-06-2010 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the Rules. 5. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________________ B. SESHASAYANA REDDY, J July 02, 2010. PN THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15386 of 2010 July 02, 2010