THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.CH.SURYA RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH Writ Petition No.12570 of 2006 (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice T.Ch.Surya Rao) Dated 23rd June, 2006 Between: Smt.Nasreen Sultana .. Petitioner and The Revenue Divisional Officer and others .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.CH.SURYA RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH Writ Petition No.12570 of 2006 ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice T.Ch.Surya Rao) -- The petitioner suffered an order of eviction in L.G.O.P. No.206 of 2002, having chosen to remain ex parte there. That order has become final. Subsequently, the applicant in L.G.O.P. No.206 of 2002 filed an interlocutory application under Section 15 (1) of the A.P. Land Grabbing Act, requesting the Tribunal to communicate the final decision to the parties and to direct the respondents to deliver the property. There, the petitioner appeared and represented before the Court that they have nothing to do with the property and that they were not in actual possession of the suit property. Having regard to the said representation, the Tribunal allowed the application. The petitioner is now seeking to assail the said order in the instant writ petition on the premise that she has nothing to do with the plot No.214, as mentioned in the schedule and that she is interested in the neighbouring plot, namely, the plot covered by No.213 and that there is every apprehension that the applicant might seek to dispossess her, taking advantage of the situation. Such a plea has not been raised by the petitioner at any stage of the proceedings. As stated hereinabove, she remained ex parte in L.G.O.P. and she represented that she has nothing to do with the property in the interlocutory application filed by the applicant in L.G.O.P. Therefore, the present writ petition is misconceived and cannot be entertained. Writ Petition is dismissed at the threshold. But, no order as to costs. __________________ T.CH.SURYA RAO, J. _________________ G.CHANDRAIAH, J. 23rd June, 2006. skmr