HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA CRL.P.No.4586 of 2007 ORDER: Petitioner seeks quashing of the order passed in Crl.R.P.No.88 of 2005 dated 28.11.2006 on the file of the I Additional Sessions Judge, Srikakulam, setting aside the order passed in M.C.No.48 of 2003 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Rajam, Srikakulam District. Though this petition was listed for the first time on 10.08.2007 and underwent two adjournments, this Court declined to grant any interim order. 1st respondent-wife filed the aforesaid M.C.No.48 of 2003 seeking maintenance at the rate of Rs.500/- per month from the petitioner herein. The trial Court, after an analysis of the entire evidence available on record, dismissed the said petition since the 1st respondent hereein failed to establish means of the petitioner herein. Questioning the said order, the 1st respondent herein preferred Crl.R.P.No.88 of 2005 and the learned I-Additional Sessions Judge, Srikakulam, after re-assessing the entire evidence, allowed the said revision directing the petitioner herein to pay Rs.250/- per month to the 1st respondent-wife towards maintenance. Aggrieved by the same, the present criminal petition is filed by the petitioner. The revisional Court has discussed the entire evidence available on record and gave a finding that the 1st respondent is entitled to maintenance, which factual aspect cannot be gone into by this Court invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. I find no merit in this petition. The Criminal Petition is accordingly dismissed. _______________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 2O.04.2010 Gsn.