IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.587 of 2009 KUMAR MANISH Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS 3 13.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused order of the writ court. Grievance raised by the writ petitioner / appellant is that guideline issued by the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas dated 17th November, 2005 is being violated by Bharat Petroleum by permitting the erection and installation of Petrol Pump by resiting the old Petrol Pump whereas the permission and license is for a new Petrol Pump. The writ Court has declined to go into the merits of the writ petitioner’s case on the ground that there is apparent rivalry in trade between competing dealers on account of location of two out lets close to one another. After going through the guide line, contained in Annexure-1 to the writ petition, we are also of the view that there is no violation of any statutory or other right of the writ petitioner / appellant so as to attract exercise of writ jurisdiction. In the facts of the case, the appeal is disposed of 2 but with an observation that, if so advised, the writ petitioner / appellant may file representation in the matter before the Authority which has issued the guide lines and the other concerned Authorities, that is, Bharat Petroleum Corporation. If such representations are filed, they should be disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law. In case the appellant is not satisfied with the action of the Authorities, if so advised, he may seek his remedy in accordance with law but not through writ petition. (Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ.) (Anjana Prakash, J.) AAhmad