IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1148 of 2008 BHOLA MIAN, S/o Adalat Mian, R/o Panchbhidiya, P.S. Ramgarhwa, Dist. East Champaran Versus 1. The STATE OF BIHAR 2. Harilal Mahto 3. Rajdeo Mahto 4. Shyamlal Mahto 5. Ramadesh Mahto 6. Naresh Mahto. ------ 2/ 04.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties. The revision application is filed for setting aside the order dated 14.07.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. IV, East Champaran in Cr. Revision No. 513 of 2007. I find no substance in the submission of the learned counsel that order was just and proper. According to him, case was fixed on 18.09.2007 for argument and order. The order, it appears, is passed only without hearing the argument. Hearing of the parties is their right which in no case can be ignored. This infirmity has rightly been pointed out and observed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in impugned order in allowing the revision petition and sent the case back for hearing the parties and deciding afresh. That can be clarified only that the parties shall be given an opportunity to argue and then taken into consideration the material already available including their witnesses and documents the case shall be decided in accordance with law. With such observation, the revision petition is dismissed at the stage of admission itself. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)