^ ,A 3 c* ^ i'O M APPLIGAIION UHEEE'SSCIION 10 OF THE AO.lINISIEATITE miHnirAL'S ACT 1985. For use in the Tribunal's o££3.£ei •c^--' 0. A. OF 1994. Datfi of filing ? -( Date of Receipt ^T/i ' ^"r ^ (. by post. > Registration No, "-7^2- HEGISSRAR WSBE mSBSa PRADESH AIMINISIRAIITB TRIBUfflkL; JABA XJR. BEIJffiiBf 1. APPLTCANTS:- 1. Vinod Sumar Shukla son of Shri Lalla Prasad Shukla, Assistan-t Teacher, Govt.Primary Sohool Udaikala Vikasshand Lohgra, Distt. Bajnandgaon. 2. Jag'fcaran Smgh Sahu^ s/o ShriToran Singb Sabu, Assis'tsnt reacher, Govt.pre-Niddle School Udaiakhurd Vikagkhand Sahas-Lohgra, Distriot Rajngndgaon. 3. TeJKumar Pandey g/o Shri RaB Nargyan Pandey, Assistant Teacher, Govt.Primary School Jinda ! Tikaskhand Kawardha, Digtrict Rajnandgaon. 4. prashanna S-imar Shukla s/o Shri Rgm Krisbna ShuKLa, Assistan.t Seachgr Pre Middle School, ; Mgharajpur Vikasishand Bodla, Eawardha, Distnot 1 Sa3T1andgaon. . ' 5. Dwarka Singh Ihakur, s/o Shri Eushal Singh Ifaakur^ ^ssis-fcant Seacher, Qovt. H.s.School, Kawardiaa, Vikaskhand Kawardha Qistrict; . ' ' Kajnandgaon M.P. . ' i 6. Rekhalal Sewangang/o Shri Bisheshwar Dewangan, ' ' As.sis.t.ant_Teacber, Govt.Primary School 1'hakurtols Vikaskhand Dongergarh/ District Rajnandgaon. 7. Satigh Kumar^Yadu, s/o_gari F.L.Zadu, Assistan-!; Teaaher, Govt.Primary School Khalrbana Vikaskhane Bodla, Kawardha, Sistriat Rajnandgaon. s* 5°dhaDlal.sahu», s/o shri,Kun3raB 3ahu, dssistan-fc Teacher, Govt.Primary -Sohool 'Detoi' fikaskhand Kawardha, Distriot Rajnandgaon M.p. 2. NON APPLICANTS VERSPS 1* 3tate.of M°p- through Secretar;'- School Bduoation Departmenr M.P.Bhopal.^ 2. Jolnt SlxeotoT Publlo Instrnc-fcioB, Education Division Birg M.p. 3. CoBimissioner, Raipur Division Baipur (M.p.), ^"^•^^^E^;^,^-;^;^-:-.^^•: HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE GHHATTiSGARH : BILASPUR Sinflle Bench Hon'bteShri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Petitioners Respondents F. P.(S)No. 877 of 2005, Vinod Kumar Shukla and Others. Versus State of !W.P.(Now C.G.) and others. Shri H.S. Ahluwalia, counsei for the petitioners. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer, for the State/ respondents. (Passed on 22nd of January, 2007) ; Learned couhset appearing for the petitioners as well as learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondente jointly submit that the facts of the present case are similar to that of in W.P. No.499 of (Rajeshwar Rao Kridat Vs. State ofChhattisgarh and Others), \vhich was disposed of by this Court vide Order dated 9th October, 2006. they further submit thatthe question of law involved is alsothe same. (2) In view of the above stated submissions made by learned counsel forthe parties, the writ petition is disposedof in terms oftheOrder dated 9th October, 2006 passed by this Court in W.P. No.499 of 2005. NQ order as to costs.. Sadsh K. Agnihotri Judge