THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5584 of 2009 ORDER: 1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated 15.10.2009 in E.P. No.170 of 2008 in O.S. No.1340 of 1987 on the file of the IX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, whereunder and whereby a warrant under Order XXI Rule 35 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’) for delivery of vacant possession of the schedule property to the respondent/decree holder against the petitioners 2 to 4/judgment debtors 2 to 4 was issued. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The suit filed by the decree holder was partly decreed directing the deceased judgment debtor no.1 to hand over vacant possession of the schedule property to the decree holder by demolishing the unauthorized erection in the property. The appeal filed by the deceased judgment debtor no.1 was dismissed confirming the judgment and decree of the trial court. When the Second Appeal was preferred before this court, the parties have compromised the matter whereunder the petitioners were given a lease for a particular period. In pursuance of the same, the Second Appeal was dismissed. So, the judgment and decree of the trial Court have been confirmed, whereunder and whereby the judgment debtors 2 to 4 are bound to vacate the premises in question and hand over the possession to the decree holder. Therefore, issuance of the delivery warrant is completely in accordance with the decree, and impugned order does not suffer from any infirmities so as to call for interference by this Court. 4. However, the learned counsel for the petitioners stated that at the time of filing of the appeal, a lease deed was executed in between the judgment debtors 2 to 4 and the respondent herein, and it is going to expire by the end of April, 2011. Considering the said aspect, a reasonable time can be granted to the judgment debtors 2 to 4 to vacate the premises in question. Accordingly, they are granted time till end of April, 2011 to vacate the schedule premises and hand over the same to decree holder, failing which the impugned order of the trial court shall be given effect to. 5. With the above observation, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 21.2.2011 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5584 of 2009 21.2.2011 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5584 of 2009 21.2.2011 Between: Shaik Ibrahim (died) & others …Petitioners And Fathima Begum …Respondent