1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.516 OF 2011 Rajiv Kapildev Gupta Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents Ms.Seema Gupta i/by A.M.Saraogi for petitioner. Ms.A.S.Pai, APP for respondent nos.1 and 2. Ms.Lara Jesani i/by M.Mulla Associates for respondent no.3. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR AND P.D.KODE, JJ. DATE : 24th August 2011 PC : 1. Ms.Lara Jesani instructed by M/s.M.Mulla Associates submits that she had appeared on 15th June 2011 on the basis of oral instructions received from respondent no.3. Now she submits that written authority has not been given by respondent no.3 so far for which reason she as well as the appearance of instructing attorneys be discharged from the present petition. On the oral request made, we accede to this prayer. Office to proceed on the basis that none appears for respondent no.3 although the respondent no.3 is aware of the pendency of the present petition and the stage thereof. 2. Be that as it may, since the further proceeding of this petition has been stayed by the Apex Court on 13th June 2011, the petition is adjourned sine-die till the stay is vacated by the Apex Court. It will be open to the parties to inform this Court as soon as further orders are passed by the Apex Court. (P.D.KODE, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)