IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.797 of 2009 BAIDHYA NATH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4. 03.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is informant of Kalluahi Police Station Case No. 370 of 2008 registered against respondent no. 7 to 26 under sections 147,148,149,323,324,448,307,380,302 I.P.C. dated 28.11.2008. In the instant writ petition the petitioner has prayed for proper investigation of the case and for direction to respondent to arrest the accused persons named in the F.I.R. In the counter affidavit dated 23.12.2009 sworn by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Headquarters, Madhubani it is stated in para 8 that during investigation the case has been found to be true under sections 147,148,324,307,379 and 302 I.P.C. against all the 20 named accused persons. In para 9, names of accused persons have been mentioned who had been arrested by police in this case. In para 5 of the supplementary counter affidavit dated 28.7.2010 it has been stated the successor Superintendent of Police, Madhubani too supervised the matter and found the case to be true under aforesaid sections against all the F.I.R. named accused persons. Some of the accused persons surrendered in the court on 16.12.2009 while some of them surrendered in the court on 4.5.2010 2 and was allowed bail. It is further stated in the supplementary counter affidavit that Deputy Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga also reviewed the case and found more appropriate the supervision made by Sri Rakesh Rathi, the then Superintendent of Police and ordered to follow his direction. It is further stated that at present the case has not been found to be true against 14 other accused persons including respondent no.13, namely, Mahesh Yadav. Rest six accused persons are on bail, allowed by the court. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Superintendent of police, Madhubani/I.O. of the case, if he has any grievance with the final submission of police report. This court has not gone into the merits of the case. Shashi. ( Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)