./ ^ L<~ ^* IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition N0. A ^ ^^/2004 PETITIONER ^:^) Smt. Brahspati Bai,aged 22 Yrs ,\J[^\'^^y~ Wd/o. Late Narayan Das Mahant ••*.^ f\S*' -* T^/^v^7-'11 T^^-^^^^l^ T^-^-*^-' %^\' ^^•w ^^'^''.-^ \^",6-' RESPONDENTS 2. R/o Vill. Parsada, Janjgir, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary General Administrative Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 3. Executive Engineer Hasdeo Nahar Jal Prabandh Sambhag Janjgir Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 QELTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER FORM^R DIRECTION OR ORDER AS TO THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER ».^-5.^.^5>tii%S. S'-S&S XI-HC-22 ^ •ysi qTqrTT'^hHI«=h L '^te'4T$, f^iT^: 3TT^T "^^ ^:±...^:.:^^/^ f^^r' •ZT^T-^I KrU^ ^RT^I ^TiN"^fer 9/ ^n'^i '^Ti^77 'R'f^r •spN^^H TTO^T ^ •fe(Zt Tr?r-?R y. 3T?^R '3TR"7l 22-12-2005 Petitioner by Shri C^^a^ y -^. p^^-jcd^ Advocate. Shri Vivek Sharma; Panel Lawyer,1 Heard. This case relates to compassiona| employee sen/ing in the State. Learned counsel for the petitionerj categorically stated that in this case, the death of the employee has occurred on or after 1-^ in bateh of cases bearing W.P. No.1322/^ passed by this Court on 20/12/2005. h4e also. Learned counsel for the State doe of Chhattisgarh has taken a decision employees who died on or after 1/11/199[7 strictly in accordance with the policy prevatent at that time. In view of the submissions mad' without expressing any opinion on the m^i petitioner is also directed to render due c<i any grievance still remains, the petitior^ inctuding filing ofthe petition before this (Rourt. With the aforesaid obse^ations, t(iis petition stands disposed of. Certiified copy as per rules. • . Copy to the State counsel, who respondents for compliance. 'for the State. e appointment consequent upon the death of an 1-1997 and not earlier. It is further submitted that 002 involving the same question orders have been >rays that similar orders may be passed in this case not dispute the above fact and state that the State. to consider the cases of dependants of those |e by leamed counse! appearing for the parties, |rits ofthe case, in the opinion ofthis Court, ends of justice will be served if a direction is giv^n to the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities concerned to consider and decide the c^se of the petitioner in accordance with the policy prevatent at the time of death of the em^loyee concerned. If the petttioner found eligible, appointment orders wilt.be issued as ea|^ly as possible on or before 30'" April, 2006. The ^-operation to the authorities. It is made c!ear that if er may avail. the remedy avaitable under the law will be obtiged to communicate the order to the Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge jMFJc^PT