IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DECEMBER 2009 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 36248 of 2009(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SHAHEEN.K.H., KANHIRATHIL HOUSE, NATTUKAL P.O., MANNARKAD, PALAKKAD. 2. ASHARUDHEEN.K., KALLAYI (H), CHAPPANANGADI (P.O.), KOTTAKAL, MALAPPURAM. 3. ZAINUL ABIDHEEN.C., KARAMBATHOOR, PALLIPURAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.MANSOOR.B.H. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., CALICUT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., CALICUT. BY SC SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J ------------------- W.P.(C).36248/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 16th day of December, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioners appeared for the II year B.Pharm Degree Examination conducted by the University of Calicut in February, 2009. The results were published in August, 2009. The petitioners failed in the subject Pharmaceutical Analysis-1 Part A & B. They have therefore applied for revaluation of their answer scripts by submitting Exts.P1, P2 and P3 applications dated 27.8.2009, 17.8.2009 and 29.8.2009 respectively. It is stated that requisite fee was also paid on the same day. The petitioners submit that though more than three months have passed, their answer scripts have not been revalued, that they had done well in the examination and if their answer scripts are revalued, they are sure to secure a pass in the examination. The petitioners also submit that they will complete their course of study at the end of next year and that in such circumstances, it is only desirable that their answer scripts are expeditiously revalued. Sri.P.C.Sasidharan the learned standing counsel appearing for the University of Calicut submits that if the W.P.(C).36248/09 2 applications for revaluation submitted by the petitioners are in order, the University will take expeditious steps to revalue the answer scripts. In the light of the said submission, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to take steps to have the petitioners' answer scripts described in Exts.P1 to P3 applications revalued and communicate results to them within eight weeks from the date on which the petitioners produce a certified copy of this judgment before the Registrar, University of Calicut. P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge mrcs