In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-17804 of 2009 (O&M) Satnam Singh and another ..... Petitioners vs State of Punjab ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. P. S. Ahluwalia, Advocate, for the complainant. Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he does not press the petition on behalf of petitioner no. 2 Harwinder Singh son of Baldev Singh. Accordingly, the petition on behalf of petitioner no. 2 is dismissed as not pressed. As regards, petitioner no. 1 Satnam Singh is concerned, it is not disputed that though he was present at the spot but he had not caused any injury to any of the persons of the complainant side. Considering the aforesaid facts, it is directed that in case of arrest of petitioner no. 1, he shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting / Investigating Officer. He shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for investigation. He shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. The petition on behalf of petitioner no. 1 stands disposed of. 28.7.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge