IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 394 OF 2010 SHRI SUBODH KHARANGATE AND ANR ... Petitioner Versus SHRI FORTUNATO DE MELO AND 10 ORS ... Respondent Mr. G.B. Kamat, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. R.G. Ramani, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 25th June, 2010 P.C.: Heard. 2. It appears that the dispute as regards the closure of two doors and one ventilator persists between the petitioners/judgment debtors and respondent no.1/decree holders. This dispute can be settled before the Executing Court. Counsel state that the papaya trees, the boxes and the zinc sheets have already been removed. In the light of that nothing survives in this Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. Parties to appear before the learned Executing Court on 15/07/2010 at 10.00 a.m. and pursue the remedy in execution proceedings. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH