IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7199 of 2011 Umesh Sah @ Umesh Saha, S/O-Late Lukhi Sah Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03 06.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. There is specific allegation of rape against the petitioner and the story of rape corroborates by the medical evidence but learned counsel for the petitioner submits that informant is a lady of questionable character and she has brought this false case with some ulterior motive. Although, learned counsel for the petitioner tried to convince me about the innocence of the petitioner but I am not, at all, convinced with the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Dighalbank (Korobari) P.S. Case No. 83 of 2010 pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj is, hereby, rejected, at least, at this stage. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)