IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26443 of 2010 Shambhu Nath Mishra Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr ---------------------------------- 02. 14.12.2011. Heard Sri Naresh Dikshit, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri M. Haque, learned A.P.P. for the State. I do not want to give any remark on merit save and except observing that instant petition appears to be infructuous in the background of the fact that initiation of 144 Cr.P.C proceeding was challenged before the Revisional Court by which the same was set aside. The aforesaid revisional court’s order dated 13.07.2010 passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj in connection with Cr.Revision no.619 of 2009/233 of 2009 has been brought under challenge. As per Section 144(4)of the Cr.P.C. the prohibitory order remains enforceable for a period of 60 days, the period which has already exhausted. However, petitioner will be at liberty to protect his legal right if, he so desires, in case of any kind of infringement. B. Kr. (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)