IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 7753 of 2010 Date of Decision: 29.11.2010 Gurdayal Chand .... Petitioner Versus M/s. Mohan Lal Vinod Kumar and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. J.S. Sahni, Advocate for Mr. Mandeep K. Sajjan, Advocate for the petitioner 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 11.8.2010 passed by Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.) Abohar whereby an application moved by the petitioner requesting the trial Court to frame additional issues and to decide those issues as preliminary issues was dismissed. It is pleaded in the application for framing additional issues and for treating the issues as preliminary issues, no issue has been framed on the preliminary objections taken in the written statement. Perusal of the application would reveal that petitioner- defendant has not stated what issues were left to be framed. Allegations and contentions made in the application are so vague and ambiguous and no proposed issue is shown in the application, hence, in the opinion of this Court, learned trial Court C.R. No. 7753 of 2010 2 has committed no illegality while passing the impugned order. Petition is devoid of merit, hence, is dismissed. (ALOK SINGH) 29.11.2010 JUDGE reena