IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 26TH JULY 2010 / 4TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 18783 of 2010(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- B.MOHAMED JAMAL,AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.LATE B.M.HAMEED,RESIDING AT VILLA NO.29, SKY LINE SPRING FIELD HOMES,PADIVATTOM, ERNAKULAM,KOCHI-24. BY ADV. SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY REVENUE(F)DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-39. 2. THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT & JOINT SECRETARY,REVENUE(F) DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, REVENUE(F)DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. M.A.NISSAR,RTD DISTRICT JUDGE AND FORMER CHAIRMAN,WAKF ENQUIRY COMMISSION "YASMIN COTTAGE,THANA,KANNUR. 5. KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD,V.I.P.ROAD, KALOOR,KOCHI-17. GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.M.A.ASIF THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No.18783 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 26th day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed by the petitioner complaining of refusal on the part of respondents 1 and 3 to give a copy of the report submitted by the Enquiry Commissioner appointed under the Commission of Enquiry Act in respect of matters relating to the Kerala Wakf Board. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that a copy of the report has already been forwarded to the petitioner by post on 17.7.2010. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not received the copy stated to have been so forwarded, but he has received a copy of the report from other sources as the report has already been published. He further submits that he has already filed a writ petition challenging that report. Although the petitioner takes exception to the alleged conduct of respondents 1 and 3, he submits that in view of the fact that he has already received a copy of the order from other sources, the writ petition may be closed. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2