1 ABA 123 2011 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.123 OF2011 Deepak s/o Rajmani Shukla .. Applicant -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. A.M. Sarogi, for the Applicant. Mr. Y. M. Nakhawa, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 15th February, 2011 P.C. 1. This is an application for bail by husband who apprehends his arrest since the chargesheet against other relatives has already been filed before the competent Court for cruelty to his wife. F. I. R shows that there is allegation that ornaments and other articles worth Rs.4,45,000/- have been retained by the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is ready to hand over all the things which were with the applicant. All the same without prejudice to his rights and contentions the applicant would deposit within a period of two weeks an amount of Rs. 4,45,000/- before the learned Trial Court, to show his bonafides. In view of this, the applicant’s custodial interrogation may not be necessary for the purpose of investigation. Therefore, in the event of applicant’s arrest in 2 ABA 123 2011 CR No.37 of 2010, registered with M.I.D.C, Police Station, Andheri (E), applicant be released on the same terms as has been imposed by the learned Sessions Judge, while granting interim bail, by order dated 28.01.2011, on the following conditions :- i) The applicant shall deposit a sum of Rs.4,45,000/- before the learned Trial Court, within a period of two weeks, which amount the learned Trial Court shall deposit in maximum interest earning deposit and shall deal with the same at the end of the trial as per the result of trial . ii) If the applicant failed to deposit the amount within a period of two weeks, the application shall stand rejected without further reference to this Court. iii) The applicant shall make himself available on 21st February, 2011 at 10.00 a.m. for interrogation by Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when required Investigating Officer. iv) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; v) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. 3 ABA 123 2011 vi) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of Maharashtra and ors, in S.L.P No.7615 of 2009. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)