^;^ ;''ftS'\/^/'L. ^^^••'•" ^^%y ...••*'' Qfher Matter I'S.B.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATVRE CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. A^^ / 2006 ;3nri3 P"R£ '...... ..-!.. ii^ Petitioner Vijay Gupta Aged about 38 years, S/o Ram Gupta, R/o Infront of Mandi Gate, Arang, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) Respondents Versus :1^ 2. 3. s^ 4. Hemlal Sahu, Aged about 32 years, S/o Shri Tirath Ram Sahu R./o Birkoni, Tehsil - Arang, Dist : Raipur-C.G.I State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Mining Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Dist : Raipur-fC.G.) The Director Directorate of Zoology and Minining Ring Road Raipur, Tehsil & Dist: Raripur-fC.G.) Tbe CoUectQr. Mining Officer, Raipur, Tehsil 8s Dist : Raipur-fC.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226_/J27 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA hw'i^^^^^ _^ HIOH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hoa'ble Sbti Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W.P. N0.1P640F2006 Petttioner : Vijay Gupta Versus Respondents Hexulal Saliu & others Shri Saajeev Kumar Sahu, counsel for fhe petitioner. Sint Anju Ahuja, Deputy Goveruinent Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (27th March, 2006) 1. I.A. No. 2938/2006, appUcatiou. for pennission to wifhdraw the writ petition. 2. Learaed counsel for the petitioner, submits fhat ttie petitioner is not iliterested to pursue the uiatter and wants to withdraw this petition, to which learaed counsel for the respondents have no objection. 3. This application is ordered as prayed for. Consequenfty, the writ petition is disinissed accorduigly as wifhdrawn. No order as to costs. i Sd/- ] Satish K.Agnihotri i Judge 6^