IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 1ST NOVEMBER 2010 / 10TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 14611 of 2006(M) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- R. RAJAN, NEDUMPARAMBIL HOUSE, MUTTATHIPPARAMBU P.O. CHERTHALA- 688 527, RETIRED P.D.TEACHER, GOVERNMENT B.H.S.S. CHERTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.SABU THOZHUPPADAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ALAPPUZHA. 3. THE HEADMISTRESS, GOVT.B.H.S.S. ( S.N.M.GOVT.B.H.S.S.), CHERTHALA. 4. B. RAJESWARI AMMA, HEAD MISTRESS, GOVT B.H.S.S.(S.N.M. GOVT.B.H.S.S.), CHERTHALA. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.T.T. MUHAMOOD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/11/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------ W.P.(C).No.14611 OF 2006 ------------------------------ Dated this the 1st day of November, 2010 JUDGMENT The Writ Petition was admitted on 6.6.2006. However, process and copy of the Writ Petition were not produced. When the case was posted in the defect list before the Registrar (Judicial) on 4.10.2010, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought further time to cure the defects. In the Writ Petition, the delay in the proceedings relating to the grant of pensionary benefits is pointed out. Most probably the Writ Petition must have become infructuous. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. If the petitioner has any subsisting grievance, he will not be precluded from filing a fresh Writ Petition. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE. cms