:: 1 :: rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8952 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO.8952 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO.8952 OF 2003 ....................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda . of Coram, appearances, Court’s . Orders or directions and . Registrar’s Order Court’s or Judge’s Order ....................................................... Mr.Vaibhav Patankar i/b.Mr.A.A.Garge for the Petitioners. Mr. D. J. Shejul i/b. Mr. S. D. Dharmadhikari, Mr. H. S. Gajbheeye, Mr. P. Banarjee and Mrs. K. B. Bhanage for Respondent Nos. 1 to 24. CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATE : 22ND OCTOBER, 2008. DATE : 22ND OCTOBER, 2008. DATE : 22ND OCTOBER, 2008. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- . The Petitioners have challenged the order dated 20th November, 2003 whereby the application filed by the Petitioner/Defendant, the court refused to set aside the earlier order "No Say". This will cause the Petitioner Corporation great :: 2 :: injustice. As the Plaintiffs suit for injunction is filed by Jai Jawan Stall Market Welfare Association, therefore, in the interest of justice it is desirable that the corporation being necessary party to contest the matter in all respect. 2. In view of this, the impugned order is quashed and set aside. The Petitioners/Respondents is permitted to take steps. 3. Accordingly, the Petition is allowed. (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.)