IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (C) N0. ^;?'7-5" QF 2010 (S.B.) A. PETITIONER (LESSEEE) r^ V.."^V^-^ v-.u-"'''ir*/.'t''Q.^.L' . ^••"^^^^ .^"" A®0-' RESPONDENTS (LESSQR) ^iy~""-V3f:. yy^-i^ '*'• /^33€lt%». 'y ~^ ^a-.TSa^.A ~ 'V '"•i!*l-, ..-^8^ Kedar Agrawal S/o Late Nanak Chand Agrawal, aged about 54 years, R/o Village Kharora, Tahsil Tilda, District Raipur (C.G.). C/o C-66, Sector-4, Devendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Mines and Minerals, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). l.g^Wte^ |^2. The Collector (Minerals/Khanij), Raipur (C.G.). KIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION t]jj!^ (<*1 WRrrffETtnCMU ^NQ.^780F2<»t Petitfoner KedarAgr®wat Versus Respondents State of ChhaNtogarti & Anottwr WRST PETTnON U CR ARTICLE 226 OF TME GONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotrt, J.) Present:- Shri Malay Kuniar Bhaduri, Advoeate for e prtltioner. Shri A.S.I^chhawaha, Dy. Adyocate Genwal ft>r the St^e. . , • ^ '::111:' 1. 2. fl2assed on Ttfh day <rf Augurt, 2010) The petitioner, by way of this p^ltion, impugns the legality and vatklity of the alleged ctemand nottee dated 29/01/%X)9 (Annexure P-2) on the ground that ttiis is contrary to the prqvi^ions of the mining lease agreement dated 17/11^000. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner sutmnits thrt the petitioner has responded to demand nottee by letters tfated 2/4/2<X)9, 24/10/^)09,17f612009, 22^010 & 2^7^)10, biri?jlffilateno acAiw has been taken. If no orde haB be^ pS^^t pursuant to the letters written-by the petitloner, no prejudtee has been caused to the petitioner at this ^age. Even otherwise, no flnal order tes been passed in this case. If there is any contravention of the lease agreement and othewise, the petitiwier may fite approprtate response to the demand notice and after constetering Ws respsnse the - authorities areexpected to pass flnal order in aceorelance with tow. 3. AMiordingly, thewritpetltion is disposed of. No order a^o coste. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge