1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 5398 OF 2007 (Ganraj Jangluji Dhongade .v. State of Maharashtra and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri R.R. Vyas, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. I.L. Bodade, AGP for the respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri S.D. Malke, Advocate for the respondent Nos.3 to 6. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. 8TH FEBRUARY, 2008. Learned AGP appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 2, on instructions of the respondent No.2, makes a statement that the dispute between the parties has already been referred to the Civil Court under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act. In that view of the matter, the entire issue regarding disbursement will have to be decided by the learned Judge deciding the reference under Section 30 of the said Act. In that view of the matter, the order of injunction granted on 25th August, 2007 passed in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No.336/2006 by the learned 2nd Ad hoc Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nagpur has become redundant and the same is, therefore, quashed and set aside. 2 It is made clear that the disbursement of amount between the claimant shall be subject to the decision of the reference filed before the learned Civil Judge under Section 30 of the said Act. JUDGE *rrg.