IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS THURSDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2010 / 28TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 29302 of 2009(G) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- SUKU.C.A., AGED 59 YEARS, S/O.LATE AYYAPPAN, CHANGARADY HOUSE, EDAVANAKKADU P.O., VYPIN, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE SRI.A.V.JOJO RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALAPPUZHA. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALUVA. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NARAKKAL POLICE STATION. 4. SUDHI, S/O.LATE PICHAPPAN, ANJUTHAIKKAL HOUSE, EDAVANAKKADU P.O., VYPIN, ERNAKULAM. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS. ADV. SRI.GEO PAUL FOR R4 SRI.SANU MATHEW FOR R4 SRI.C.R.PRAMOD FOR R4 SRI.NOEL JOSEPH FOR R4 SRI.M.B.SANDEEP FOR R4 SRI.K.V.REJANISH FOR R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO. 29302 OF 2009: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1.TURE COPY OF THE LIST OF PERSONS ADVANCED THE AMOUNT. EXT.P2.TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 1.11.2006. EXT.P3.TRUE COPY OF THE LICENSE ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES STATION, VYPIN, ERNAKULAM DATED 23.9.2008. EXT.P4.TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 25.5.2009. EXT.P5.TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT TO THE SI OF POLICE, NARAKKAL POLICE STATION DATED NIL. K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.29302 of 2009-G ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 19th day of August, 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioner seeks the following relief: “to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to render necessary police protection to recover the mechanized country boats (Thangu vallam) having registration mark KLF-04-B (IE)-236 with Fishing Gear (Thanguvala), Leyland Engine and other article attached with the fishing vessel.” 2. A counter affidavit has been filed by the 4th respondent. We are of the view that this is a case where we need not consider the issue under Article 226. The writ petition is disposed of without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to seek appropriate reliefs before the competent Civil Court. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS