. v -.„ JBIngIieBeifh ^ ^r^> I'lll.l' ^' ,^; IN THE HIQH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR WRIT PETmONfS) N0. S^S^ OF2Q09 PETmONER: ^^ ^^s>"^^ ^ "l"- ^ ^6" <Ku. Dipti Goswami, Aged About- 28 .Years, D/b- Shri Vishnu Giri Goswami, R/o- C/o- Jogi Kuti, Near TeU Dharamshala, Ashwini Nagar, Mahadev Ghat Road, Ward No. 65, Distt. Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT(S): l^gtate of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department 1 of Culture and Archeological, D.K.S. BKawan, Raipur(G.G.) 'lll ^Vt t«!07^ !,?eoininisoner, Departniei|it of Culture aitd ArcfaeologiGal, D.K.S. Bhawari, Raipiur(C.G.) WRTrPETFnQNUNDERARTICLE226QFTHE CONSnTUTIONOFINDIA DETAILSOFTHE ll ^•'^^^^iS^ff' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition fS) No. 5424^2009 Petitioner Ku. Dipti Goswami Versus Respondents State of Chliattisgarh & another (Writ Petition underArdcle 226 offhe eonstttutioa ofliidiaj (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agiufaotri J.) Shri Vinay Paadey, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Ms Smita Ghai, Pauel Lawyer for the respondents. ORDBRforall ( Passed on this 22nd day ofSeptEmber, 2009) Heard. 1. Learaed cotmsel appearing for the petitioner, on iastructions, submits fhat fhe petitioner seeks permission of tfais Court to withdraw fhis writ petition, wifh Hberty to take appropriate steps, pursuant to the order dated 3.3.2008, p^sed inW.P.(S) No. 5936 of2007, 2. Leamed counsel appeartng for the respondents have no objectkai. 3. In view of fhe foregomg the writ petition is dismissed as wifhdrawa, with the above-stated liberty. No order asto costs. TbBlait Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge KiK BE