w 1<P-«'' .ias •^is IHE Hiaa eouas OE JTOIOATUBE OF CBH&SIISSASH AI BIIASPKE WBIE PEETIOH TOBEE &E'EIGI,ES 226 & 237 OFJSE COMSI'I'EtjnON OF INBI& ' w.p. •^Q.SQS-./Qt 2001 i PEEITJONEB: Smt. Se-Bki Bai SosSssr, vi£s:0&^ Shrl Bewaram S.on.kgr, aged: :aBi0ui1j,: 29,years, 3./3 YiliEige^Iagra,||f; Tah. L©rmi,'Eis'fc't;.^BiX&spi-iE. J |ii| '^ .ist V.er.sus 4 :BESPOHBEBB15S. y 1. S'fe.ate @f Ghto'ttei-ssarh .S.o^i.riVj; tlii-Qugli &eer®tar,y,MaIi-i-^H&E Bal ^i-k&s; B:&Eartiae]artt, :S®WST| sf Q.tifaa'ttisg^rfa, Kgipur. !' BIIISiid 8BJUI (• 'y^'^^' ^.^&y" 2; Erojec-1;- Offieer,,Iftaliil&:&^^|i|i.| - 'Bikas Depar'bmeBrb, : uormi,. , ij|t;|;isj Bistt. BilaspHp. '.' ! }' •|j[||| J. . Ghlef ExeGUti'B.e Offie.er tIaEtpad PaH.ahaya't, Barmi: Mstt. Bilasgur. :i •' '""^^'^^^^ »<'?!•' • i..' 4. Sait. AEujjana- Bai, wife 6£t; , OarpEakash CliaBdraKar, a®a:|||!J|| s.ta.out.23 years, .E/g^^agasaa 'Eala. Lormi, Eis'tife. ©ilas;pui^.| 5. Sram Psxehayat., 'Eagca, Uikas K]aai.ua.-LoFiBi,'l;iIah.Iu®FB^ijjjjl Bislst... Bilaspur. EESI-EION OTKBS.A®FEIffiBS-826 ^&: a£'7L©J_lffl GfflHSfi're'moi ,os: 'iHDa y ;,i' • ; :^'- 5? HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISQARH.BILASPUR W.P.No.992/2001 }^ Smt. Devki Bai Sonkar Vs. State of Chhaftisgarh and others Appearance: Shri K.A. Ansari, Sr. Advocate with Shri N.P.Kela.for the petitioner. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents No.1 & 2. Noneforrespondentsno.3,4&5. ORALORDER (10.08.2005) Sunil Kumar Sinha. J. Shri K.A.Ansari, Sr. Advocate with Shri N.P.Kela, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents no.l and2. . None for respondents no.3,4 & 5 though served. -•\-/..- Shri Ansari submits that the return has been filed ; on behdlf of respondent 1 dnd 2 ouid this petition may be disposed; of on the basis of this retur'nwithout causing prejudice to|the pflier respondents. j 1-l^rd Shri Ansan, counselj for the petitioner'||an|:f ^ Pankaj Shriyastava, Panel respondents! no.l|<& 2.^ i, |!..awyer|,| who appears| fw lili'l' .-Jb 5^ •^ ^ The petitioner nameiy 5mt. Devki Bai Sonkar had filed this writ petition for quashing the resolution dated 31.8.2000 (Annexure P-9) and also for conoellationof selection/Qppointment of respondent no.4 namety Smt.Anj&ni Bai as the Anganbadi Worker (Karyakarta), firarn Pomchayat Lagra, Tahsil Lormi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.6). The submissionof learnedcounsel for the petitioner is that bya resolution dated 15.8.2000 (Annewre P-7), the firarn Panchayat considered the ndmes of 4 persons namely Smt.&evki Bai.smt.Nandini Bai, Smt.Prema Bai and Smt. Sunjta Bai. This panel was decided to be sent to the Project Officer for necessary action. Th?reafter, ctnother resolution dated 31.8.2000 (Annexure P-9) was pcissed and in placeof nome of Smt.Nondini Bai which was at Serial No.2 of the resolution dated 15.8.2000, the name of Sint. Anjani Bai (respondehtno.4) was qdded ahd the same was forwarded for necessary action to the Project Officer, Women arid Child Development Department. Me fyrther submits that in pursuance of the aforesaid resolution dated 31.8.2QOO an appointment order was issued in fdvour of Smt. Anjant|Bai (respondent no.4) and she was^appointed ds an Anganbodi wQrKer in the said firarn Ponchaydt. t.eamed counsel for the petitioner suj?mits that after filinq of thjs wr-it Detition and after isSEitB'lce of.the notice, all the FeSpondents caused their appeanniee||»i<:l:| return on behalf of I'esponyents no.l & 2 has been •file^ iomi 04.12.2001. He takes me to the last six lines of Para 1| o'f]sittie,[ return of the State injwHjjch if h<^ beeri stcrted thafit'es(||^^ no.4 has aready resignect 'from ^her" post on .•rtie.groBnB^ close relative of the Pomchas ofjAe vitlt^ f^<^c^^ i..}f^'.;"^f.i draws thei ort^htion of tHis co^t'tltov^ci<^W ildsti^liinelijs tt n't- IS ^^Sll.il'l III M •'.. •* €'? "v-'--'' .^•' paragraph in which it has been mentioned that the applications received by the Project Officer are pending and will be considered in due course of time as per the directions of this Court. In view of this reply, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thispetition may be disposed of with a direction to the duthori'i-ies of the State to consider the caindiddtures of all the remaining candidates of the resolution dated 15.8.2000 and also dated 31.8.2000 excluding the name of respondeht no.4 because she hais already resigned from service. This prayer made by ledrned counsel for the petitioher is notopposed by the State because the State itself has mentioned ^. . . :• • • •' • ' ' .':'.; in the return that the appoinfment is to be made but the same is awaiting the resulfor direction ofthiscourt. Ihave heard learned counsel for the partiesand haye also perused the recbrds of the writ petition. It appears to me that under the Scheme of appointmen|t pf Anganbadi workers, names were called upon from the concerned Gram Poaichoyat dnd the fipam Pcuichaiyort was under ol:tli9atip^|t0i send the panel »fsuitable persons to the Project QffiCer andl: thereafter the coinpetent authbr'ity had; to pass some oppointment of Anganbadi! workerS from the Ranel sent b^|^i^irn PcOTcha^^, i Inj this rrial^p, fiMt of^ d 15.8,2000; vTOSpasseddndtiiehameofthe the other three per^6ns;^r^ <»nsideped and jl- w^ : be ' forwarded ,to,^rhe .•RiECiject'::l©f!ficer. orider' Wts tas !in|Ktti for m a ii-'li: '?.;i: liiil'!fl i^ }-w /Rao/ 'S-th' ?isi resolution took place and instead of 4 persons, names of 5 persons we.re considered dnd among these 5 persons, respondent no.4 Snit. Anjani Bai was appointed on the saidpost. Later on Smt. Anjani Devi resigned from the said postand thafpost is lying vacant. In the facts ouid circumstonces of the case, this petition is disposed of with adirection to the respondents toconsider the names of all the candidates mentioned in the panel which have been sent by the resolutions of the Sraml Panchayat dated 15.8.2000 and 31.8.2000 excluding the name of respondent no.4. Among these persons, the concerned authority shall be free fo appoint any suitable persons iri ciccordance with law. With the aforesaid directions, this petition stands finalty dispoisedof. ' | There shall be no order as to cost. i Sd/- SuniIKumar Sinha Judge 10.8.2005 ;si^®^l ^Ma§ll •11^1'aai ^!:f:(riir!.:^ illlBll iJMli81K8 w? ^^ '^&'. ':\ Kt'. :ai:^» m w Bl iSSilBB iiaisgr ;ii3S: WBI 111