HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(C) No.104l2011 WRIT PETlTlON UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance : Mrs. Hameeda Siddique, Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.1 on advance copy. t; ORAL ORDER (27.01.2011) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA J. Heard. l x The petitioner has tiled this petition challenging the notice dated 09.04.2010, by which; he has been directed to remove the possession of the subject property contained in the notice. Learned counsel for the petitioner subr'nits no notice of the proceedings was received by the petitioner and an order of eviction has been passed. She submits that the Board has observed that after issuance of notice, .....,.. g the petitioner did not turn up; therefore, the order of PETITIONER Masood Khan Son of Haji Abdul Rahim Khan, aged about 33 years, R/o Akbar Khan Ka Bada, Juni Line Bilaspur. District Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENT$ 1 Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Acting Through Secretary, Department of Public Trust, t D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Chhattisgarh State Wakf Board, Through its Chief Executive Officer, Devendra Nagar, Biiaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 W.P.(Cr.) No.414l2011 eviction was passed by the Board. Her submission is that earlier, no notice of the proceedings of the Board was served upon the petitioner and the petitioner has receiVed _ the first notice on 09.04.2010. She further submits that the petitioner has already approached the authorities of the Board and the proceedings before the Board is stiii pending. in view of the above, she seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to pursue the proceedings pending before the Board. s Permission granted. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of at this stage, as withdrawn,with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. Sd/— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge