w IN THEHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P,No.......;.^.lT:.u.'^...../2006 PETITIONER .^^ ...^^ s •' '^"^->" ^^^'y ye"' .•••• /' R.R.Baiga S/0 Shri Samme lal Baiga Aged about 41 years Occupation -Sub Engineer, Mini Mata Bango Canal Division No.6, Sakti, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS <^1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Principal Secretary Department of Water Resources D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (Chhattisgarh) vr' / CUSSK. ^ A ^-3. 5. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Principal Secretary Department of Panchayat and Rural Development D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Development CQinmissioner Department ofPanchayat and Rural Developaient Raipur (Chhatdsgarh) Engineer-in-Chief Water Resources Department Sihava Bhawan Raipur(Chhatdsgarh) Chief Engineer, Minimata Bango Project, Departnient of Water Resources, Bilaspur, (C.G.) -6. Executive Engineer Minimata Bango Canal Division Nandeli Bhata, Sakti Distt- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2260F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS TO MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- a. t.^'L XI-HC-78 3^';!IPn5ra-.g5ftart3L^5nnm- XI-HC-78 3'5^'aipncra', tSTn'y'is, l°idwy *11*1C^I HlHltt) ^ 200 3(1^?T4^th ('i?lt^°l<«<T) sn^rwfiaN; trarsn^Tsiiiii^ gwramfN^n^r 2933/2(1)06 14-7-2006 W.P.Nos.2921/2006, 2877/2 2882/2006, 2906/2006, 2942/2006, 2960/2006, 2996/2006, 3045/2cx)6, 3079/2006. 3081/2(K>6, 3189/2006, 3205/2006, 3246/2006,3417/2006,3418/Z006.1 Petitioners by Shpi Kanak Tijuari Shashi Bhushan. Shri Manoj Paranjp|i Sunil Otwani, 5hri Sautam Khetrapal R.5. Shrivastaya, Shri Rakesh Kumar|Jha State/respondents by Shri Shri V.V.S. Murthy & Shri 6.K. Beriw(il. Bajaj, Sovernment Advocate for the Shri R.P. Mandal, SecretaryJ Shri N.S. Bhadorjya, Engineer'-in-Chj Haldkar, CEO, CGRRM; Shri S.Kl Services; Shri S.N. Shrivastava, Sup|ei Offjcer-in-Charge, and Shri Subo<(f Resources Departments & Officer-in| Hearci. By these wr-it petitions, the| Water Resources Department, have 2-2006, whereby they have been sen) tiiftci'fl'f *(i>iflTtfte^t <Rit<;i< ^sri^rsn^r 006, 2878/2006, 2879/2006, 2880/2006. 2938/2006, 2940/2006, 2941/2006, 2998/2006, 3000/2006, 3044/2006, 3344/2006, 1563/2006, 3177/2006, 3224/2006, 3Z25/2006, 3240/2006, juari & P.K.C. Tjwary, Sr. Advocates with Shri i|e, Shri Jitendra Pali, Shr-i Vinay Pandey. Shri Shri A.K.. Prasad, Shri AAaneesh Sharma, Shri |Jha. t.K. Verma, (4dditional ^dvocate Seneral with I, Deputy Advocate Senerals and Shri Sumesh IState. |Panchayat A Rural Development Department; fef, Woter Resources Depar.tment; Shri M.L. Supta, Chief Engineer, Rural Engineerin9 ^rintending Engineer, PAA6SY, Circle; Raipur & ^h Shrivastava, Executive Engineer, Water lChapge are present in Court. petitioners, who cre ^ssistant Engineera in hallen9ed -the orders dated 12-6-2CX36 A 24- on deputation to various other Depa"tments. XI-HC-78 sn^Twf^m? (WTSn^T^trf, Soma 3^ •<iNin<i, ^Tflti'ld [5)diy^< *ii*ini sh+ii9i ^ 200 w^T'ra^? (tpfg^^r) 8?<ITWaf?tT3T1^!fr ^t the outset, Shri Pramod before the Court that if the impugi quashed in respect of the petitione they have no objection. Shri Kanak Tiwari, learned affidavit along with Minutes of Mee- there is every apprehension that scheme in respect of the petitionei Therefore. he wants to-file a countei The prayer of learned Sei acceded, for the reason that in| questioned the legality and corn 24-2-2006 and moreover, the so 6-7-2006 are not the subject matt) have not passed any order under th< by Shri Kanak Tiwarj is rejected. In view of the statement V.V.S. Murthy in presence of thi 12-6-2006 & 24-2-2006 where.by ^ Resources Oepartment as <4ssistant various other iSepartments are quas) Parties are entitled for certl if]i<iFci<fl'f iiiciTffte^iRiwK ^sif^'iTsn^r [erma & Shri V.V.S. Murthy made a statement •fed orders dated 12-6-2006 & 24-2-200(i we \s who have filecl petitions before this Court, i^nior ^dvocate, submitted that a copy of the (ing dated 6-7-2006 has been filed, therefore, |he respondents may pass orders under that ^s and it wi[l affeet the petitioners' interest. affidavit. ior Advocate Shr-i Kanak Tiwari cannot be these writ petitions, the petitioners have tctness of the orders doted 12-6-2006 A (alled 9uidelines prepared vide Minutes dated sr in these writ petitions and the respondents jse guidelines, so far. <4s such, the prayer made 4ade at the Bar by Shri P.K. Verma and Shri Officers of the State, the or-ders dated ic petitioners, who are workmg in the Water Engineers and have been.sent on deputation to sd and their writ petitions are allowed. :ied copy of •this ordep. __ Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge s^