:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8431 OF 2005 Sudhagad Education Soc. and ors. ..Petitioners Vs. Mrs. Shobha M. Patil and ors. ..Respondents Mr. Mandar Limaye for petitioners. Mrs.Anita A. Agarwal for respondent no.1. Ms. S.S. Bhende, AGP for State. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. Date : March 16, 2007. Date : March 16, 2007. Date : March 16, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This petition impugns the Judgment and Order of the School Tribunal passed on 4/1/2005 and by my order dated 16/8/2006 I had already held that the view taken by the Tribunal did not call for interference. . As per the further directions even to the Education Officer, Secondary, Zilla Parishad, Raigad, an affidavit in reply has been filed pointing out that for the teacher in physical education there is enough workload under the original petitioner-society and Mrs. Agarwal, the learned counsel appearing for the original respondent-teacher states that the :2: appointment of the respondent has been approved as an assistant teacher in physical education by the said Education Officer by now. . In view of this nothing further survives in this petition and the same shall stand disposed off. The respondent shall continue as an Assistant Teacher/Shikshan Sevak in physical education. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)