IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1794 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1794 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1794 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO. 966 OF 2008 The Director of Income Tax (I.T.) Mumbai 400 038. ..Appellant Versus Shri Jaswant N. Nayee ..Respondent Mr. Vimal Gupta, Advocate, i/b. Mr. P.s.S.Sahadevan,Advocate, for the for the appellant. Mr. Atul Jasani, Advocate, for the Respondent. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & J.H.BHATIA, JJ. J.H.BHATIA, JJ. J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 23rd June, 2008. DATE : 23rd June, 2008. DATE : 23rd June, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Mr. Atul Jasani, the learned Counsel for the assessee has invited our attention to a decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax Commissioner of Income-Tax Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Camco Colour Co.2002 ITR 565 vs. Camco Colour Co.2002 ITR 565 vs. Camco Colour Co.2002 ITR 565 and also the subsequent Circular dated 24.10.2005 by the Government of India. As per the said Circular, the Government of India has decided to file appeals where the tax effect exceeds the revised monetary limits. 2. The learned Counsel for the Revenue, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the Notice of Motion as well as the Appeal. 3. Leave granted. The Notice of Motion as well as the Appeal are disposed as withdrawn. (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)