IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 76 OF 2005 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 76 OF 2005 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 76 OF 2005 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.1542 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.1542 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.1542 OF 2004 AIR INDIA AIRCAFT ENGINEERS’ASSOCIATION.. PETITIONER VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA & Ors. .. RESPONDENTS Mr. D.G. Bagwe for the petitioner. Mr. Y.S.Bhate for Respodnents 1 to 3. Mr. J.S.Saluja i/b. M.V.Kini &Co. for Respondent No.4. CORAM CORAM CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. S.K.SHAH,J. S.K.SHAH,J. DATE DATE DATE : 7th October,2005. 7th October,2005. 7th October,2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. The order of which contempt is alleged was passed on 9th December, 2004. The leaned Counsel appearing for the petitioner undertook to file an appropriate application under Rule 62 within one week. The Counsel representing Respondent No.1 submitted that if such an application is made, the same would be considered within two months from the date of the application. The learned Counsel representing Respondent No.3 - Air India Limited stated that they shall co-operate and the application be decided by the learned Presiding Officer within two months from making of such application. 3. It so happened that the Presiding Officer i.e. the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) Mumbai, on hearing the matter closed the matter for orders. However, before he passed any order, he was transferred to Chennai and the matter remained undecided. Therefore, the Contempt Petition has been filed. 4. The Respondent No.2 herein - the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Mumbai is present. The learned Counsel representing the Respondent No.2 makes a statement that he is ready to decide the matter within two weeks. He however requests that the parties shall remain present on a particular date. 5. The petitioner and the Respondent No.4 shall remain present before the Respondent No.2 on 11.10.2005 for hearing. The Respondent No.2 shall decide the matter within two weeks after the hearing is completed. With this nothing survives in the Petition. The Contempt Petition stands disposed of. Parties to act on a copy of this Order duly authenticated by the Associate of this Court. ---- (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.)