IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12166 of 2010 SAROJ KUMAR UPADHYA @ SAROJ UPADHYA S/O BECHU UPADHYA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BALUA, P.S. BUXAR MUFFASIL, DISTRICT- BUXAR. … PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH COMMISSIONER CUM PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, BIHAR AT PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BUXAR. 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUATION, BUXAR. 5. THE MEMBER, DISTRICT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BUXAR. 6. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, RAJPUR, DISTRICT- BUXAR. 7. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENTION OFFICE, RAJPUR, DISTRICT- BUXAR. 8. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ HETHUA, P.S. RAJPUR, DISTRICT- BUXAR. 9. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY CUM PANCHAYAT SACHIV, HETHUA, P.S. RAJPUR, DISTRICT- BUXAR. 10. RUBI KUMARI DAUGHTER OF SADANAND SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SISRARH, P.O. SISRAH, P.S. RAJPUR, DISTRICT- BUXAR PRESENTLY POSTED AS PANCHAYAT TEACHER, PRIMARY SCHOOL BAHUARA, P.S. RAJPUR, DISTRICT- BUXAR. 11. SRI NIWASH PRASAD, S/O SRI CHANDRAMA RAM, R/O VILLAGE- NONAURO, P.S. RAJPUR, DISTRICT- BUXAR. 12. MANJU KUMARI DAUGHTER OF LATE RAM LAL SINGH, R/O VILLAGE EKRASH P.S. RAJPUR, DISTRICT- BUXAR. 13. CHANDRAWATI KUMARI @ CHANDRAWATI DEVI WIFE OF BUDDHAN RAM, R/O VILLAGE- KUSURPUR, P.S. RAJPUR, DISTRICT- BUXAR. 14. DEEPAK KUMAR SINGH S/O NOT KNOWN, PRESENTLY POSTED AS PANCHAYAT TEACHER IN PRIMARY SCHOOL GYANICHAK, P.S. RAJPUR, DISTRICT- BUXAR. 15. JAI PRAKASH RAM S/O NOT KNOWN, VILLAGE SISRAH, P.S. RAJPUR, DISTRICT- BUXAR. .. RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 28.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The Court is not inclined to entertain the writ application at this stage on mere apprehension of the petitioner 2 that he may be removed from his post because of a letter issued by the Block Development Officer way back on 10.10.2008. Averment of the petitioner is that he is still continuing as a teacher and imparting teaching in the concerned Panchayat without any let or hindrance. The Court can only observe that in case any decision is taken contrary to the interest of the petitioner, he has remedy to move before the appellate authority on this issue. In the opinion of this Court, the petitioner has rushed to the High Court at a premature stage. The writ is disposed off in the light of observation as above. Ibrar/- ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)