*1* IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.252/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1767/2007. Dadu Nana Jagtap. ..Appellant -VERSUS- M/s Bilas Infusion & Surgial Private Limited and others. ..Respondents ............... Mr.Pravin D. Patel, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr.M.S.Karnik, Advocate for the Respondents. ............... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.P. DESHPANDE, JJ. Dated 18th December, 2009. P.C.:- 1 Heard the counsel for Appellant. We find no reason to depart from the view expressed by the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge has declined to entertain Writ Petition on the ground that the issue raised by Appellant was to assail the concurrent finding of fact recorded by the Courts below. Nothing is brought to our notice as to how the opinion so reached by the learned Single Judge is either perverse or manifestly wrong. No ground to interfere is made out. 2 Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. (A.P. Deshpande, J) (A.M.Khanwilkar, J)