1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Monday, the Twenty Second day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.PALANIVELU CRL OP(MD)Nos.10798 & 10917 of 2011 1 MURUGAN 2 BOOPATHY 3 SUBRAMANI 4 PANJU :PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NOS.4 TO 7 IN CRL OP(MD)NO.10798/11 1 THIRUPPATHY 2 KALIYAMMAL 3 POTHUMPONNU :PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.8 TO 10 IN CRL OP(MD)NO.10917/11 -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SAMAYANALLUR, MADURAI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.10/11) :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT IN BOTH CRL OP'S For Petitioner in both Crl.OP's :M/S. N.ANANDKUMAR Advocate For Respondent in both Crl.OP's :MR.A.RAMAR, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PETITIONS FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. ORDER:The Court Made the following order:- The petitioners/A4 to A10 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498(A) I.P.C. and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.10 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that all the petitioners are in-laws of the defacto complainant and A1 has already been arrested and released on bail and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners are in-laws of the defacto complainant and the allegation against the petitioners are that they have demanded additional dowry of Rs.10,000/- and 10 sovereign of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 gold and tortured the defacto complainant and they prevented her to love with her husband and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that all the petitioners are in-laws of the defacto complainant and A1has already been arrested and released on bail, since the issue is relating to family affairs, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Madurai and on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 22/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.The Judicial Magistrate No:IV, Madurai. 2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Samayanallur, Madurai District. +1CC to M/S. N.ANANDKUMAR Advocate SR.No.28671. RP/24.08.2011/2P/6C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD)Nos.10798 & 10917 of 2011 Date:22/08/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/