THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 5565 of 2009 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus to declare the order dated 18.2.2009 passed by the Tahsildar, Keesara Mandal, Rangareddy District and the suo motu revision application dated 18.2.2009 before 3rd respondent as arbitrary and illegal. There is no necessity of going into all the details except to notice few facts that the Mandal Revenue Officer, Keesara has passed an order dated 31.3.1999 vide Proc.No.B/4472/98 to carry out amendments in respect of the lands covered by Sy.Nos. 368 to 395 of Keesara village among R. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, R. Linga Reddy, R. Raghavender Reddy, R. Srredhar Reddy, R. Krishna Reddy and R. Narasimha Reddy, based on the family partition. Aggrieved thereby, the unofficial respondents have field appeal before the Special Grade Deputy Collector and R.D.O. East Division, Rangareddy District. The said appeal was allowed and aggrieved thereby, the vendors of the petitioners herein have filed revision and the revision was allowed and the matter was remanded to 5th respondent – Mandal Revenue Officer for conducting fresh enquiry. Thereafter, the impugned order dated 18.2.2009 has been passed. Now it has come to light that the petitioners were not issued with any notice as required under the law for the purpose of conducting enquiry on remand of the case for fresh enquiry by the 3rd respondent-Joint Collector. Therefore, the petitioners could not participate in the said proceedings. Thus, it is clear that the impugned order was passed in utter violation of the principles of natural justice and, therefore, on this ground alone the impugned order dated 18.2.2009 is liable to be set aside and accordingly set aside and the matter is remanded to 5th respondent for conducting fresh enquiry into the matter as directed by the revisional authority and also this Court in W.P. No. 26130 of 2003 dated 19.12.2003 and pass appropriate orders, as per law, after issuing notice to both the parties. The enquiry shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, status quo existing as on today as to the entries in the revenue records shall be maintained. The writ petition is allowed and the matter is remanded to 5th respondent accordingly. No order as to costs. JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU. Date: 15-9-2009. MVB.