IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12622 of 2011 GIRISH KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 409, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner is that he supplied tractor to the brother of the informant in which some defects developed subsequently the brother of the informant came to know that instead of 71 H.P., 60 H.P. tractor has been given. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the brother of the informant purchased the tractor in March, 2009 during warrantee period service were made defects were recovered but after lapse of warrantee period the petitioner refused to provide service without payment. It is further submitted that accusation of supplying the less powerful tractor appears to be a frivolous accusation since this could have been claimed when the 2 brother of the informant was provided the owner manual and other documents. Considering the contractual nature of accusation, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Kashichak P.S. Case No. 56 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Nawada, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)