IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 26 OF 2008 EUFEMIANO DE SA ... Appellant Versus PHILOMENA DE SA AND 10 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. M.B. D'Costa, Sr. Counsel for the Appellant. Mr. S.M. Singbal, Advocate for the Respondent no.1. Mr. T. George John, Advocate for the Respondents no.4 and 6. Coram:- R. C. CHAVAN, J. Date:- 14th August, 2008 P.C. Heard learned Counsel. There is no question of grant of stay to inventory proceedings by way of injunction in a suit filed by the appellant. If the appellant is aggrieved by the Order that may be eventually passed he may take recourse to remedies available. The next grievance of the appellant is that he has been appointed as administrator of the estate in inventory proceedings and that the respondent has been interfering in his administation of the estate. The learned Counsel for the respondent on instructions states that his client will not interfere with the administration of the estate by appellant till the inventory proceedings are finally disposed off. In this view of the matter no further orders are required. The appeal is disposed off. R. C. CHAVAN, J. cg