IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2569 of 2007 BISWANATH HAJRA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2 10.3.2011 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the State. This application has been filed by the petitioner for quashing of an order dated 22.1.1990, whereby he was terminated from the post of Computer. Termination order was also challenged by the petitioner by filing CWJC No. 1184 of 1990 which was dismissed. He preferred SLP before the Supreme Court and the same was also dismissed. Petitioner has now come before this Court by filing fresh application on this ground that similarly situated persons, who were also terminated, they have been retained in service and the order passed in the writ application filed by them was also allowed. Against which, L.P.A. was preferred by the State and the same was dismissed. State did not challenge the order before the Supreme Court, due to which those persons continued in service. Petitioner’s case being identical, he is still under termination. I do not find that on this ground also writ application filed by the petitioner is maintainable. In 2 case petitioner has any grievance, his remedy lies before the Apex Court. This application is dismissed. A. Kumar ( Mridula Mishra, J.)