IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9612 of 2011 GORAKH MAHTO, Son of Dr. Narendra Mahto. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 326, 307/34, of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act. It appears that though the petitioner was named in the F.I.R. but subsequently during investigation the accusation was found false. Now the petitioner has been summoned under section 319 of Cr.P.C. The impugned order does not reflect any deliberation of the evidences which persuaded the learned trial court summon the petitioner under Section 319 Cr.P.C. which reflects the mechanical way in which the bail petition of the petitioner was considered. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, 2 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge(F.T.C.), Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sanjhauli P.S. Case No. 73/2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Nitesh (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)