THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU Writ Petition Nos. 17204, 17868 & 18672 OF 2007 03-08-2010 Between: G.L.Narasimha Rao and others ……….Petitioner And The Union Government of India, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, New Delhi and others ………Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU Writ Petition Nos. 17204, 17868 & 18672 OF 2007 COMMON ORDER : (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy) The petitioner, party-in-person, in W.P.No.17204 of 2007 is a practising advocate. He filed this writ petition for taking necessary action against the respondents 6 to 8 by dissolving their legislative membership and directing the 5th respondent to book a case against the respondents 6 to 8 for the various offences under IPC alleging that the respondents 6 to 8 assaulted a co-writer ‘Taslima Nasrin’ who was invited by the writers on the occasion of a ‘Book Releasing Function’ at Press Club, Hyderabad, which was broadcasted in the television channels. In the process, they have also abused the said ‘Taslima Nasrin’ in a very filthy and un-parliamentary language and hence, they are not deserved to be continued as Members of Legislative Assembly and are liable to be prosecuted for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 499, 349, 350, 351, 447, 455, 503, 504, 505, 506and 509 of IPC. 2. Connected W.P.Nos.17868 and 18672 of 2007 are filed for similar relief to initiate action against the respondents 3 to 6 by the Asmita Resource Centre for Women, a women’s social organization and the Citizens for Justice and Peace, respectively, and also a direction for cancellation of registration of the political party with the Election Commission of respondent No.7 viz., All India Majlis Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM). 3. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.Nos.17868 and 18672 of 2007 seeks permission to withdraw BOTH the writ petitions on the ground that criminal action has already been initiated against the persons who are responsible for the alleged offence. 4. The 5th respondent filed counter affidavit in W.P.No.17204 of 2005 and the same is adopted by the respondents 6 and 8. 5. The learned Advocate General having referred to the averments made in the counter-affidavit submitted that the police have already registered a case against the respondents 6 to 8 and others in Crime No.592 of 2007 on the file of Panjagutta police station, Hyderabad, and after completion of the investigation into the matter, they have filed a charge sheet and the same was numbered as C.C.No.23 of 2008. 6. Having regard to the same, no further cause would survive in all these writ petitions. Accordingly, all the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________________ JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY Dated:03-08-2010 ________________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU KVR