IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9951 of 2009 1. NEERAJ KUMAR , S/o Veerendra Prasad Shahi 2. Deepak Kumar, S/o Ramendra Prasad Shahi Both resident of village-Chakkna, P.S. Sariya, District- Muzaffarpur…… Petitioners. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt of Bihar, Patna 3. The Director, State Council of Education, Research and Training, Bihar Patna. 4. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna. 5. The District Superintendent of Education, Muzaffarpur. 6. The Block Development Officer, Sariya, Muzaffarpur. 7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Sariya, Muzaffarpur. 8. The Panchayat Secretary, Ram Ambara Raj Singh Panchayat, Sariya, Muzaffarpur. 9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gopinathpur Dokra Panchayat, Sariya, Muzaffarpur 10. The Mukhiya Panchayat Gopinathpur Dokra Sariya, Muzaffarpur. 11. The Mukhiya, Panchayat Raj Ambra Tej Singh Sariya, Muzaffarpur ………… ……….. Respondents. ----------- 2. 04.09.2009 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing for the state. Petitioners’ prayer is for quashing the order contained in Memo No. 2 dated 11.02.2008 and the order contained in Memo No. 2 dated 14.02.2008. These two orders were issued by Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj, Ambara Tej Singh Sariya, Muzaffarpur and Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Raghunathpur Dokra, Sariya, Muzaffarpur in pursuance of order contained in Memo No. 74 dated 04.02.2008 issued by Block Education Extension Officer, Saraiya, Muzaffarpur. By the impugned orders, petitioners have been terminated from 2 service, earlier appointed as trained Panchayat teachers on the basis of teachers training certificates issued by the Gandhi Hindi Vidyapeeth, Prayag, Allahabad. The ground for termination is that petitioners’ teachers training certificates are illegal. Counsel for the petitioner submits that there cases are identical to the case of writ petitioners in C.W.J.C. No. 10370 of 2009 and analogous cases. In those cases also, petitioners were terminated from their service as their Teachers’ Training Certificates had been issued from Gandhi Hindi Vidyapeeth, Prayag , Allahabad. Petitioners in those writ applications, have completed their training prior to 17.8.1995, i.e. the date since when N.E.E.T. Act came into force. Petitioners, in this writ application have completed their teachers’ training in the year, 1987 & 1994 respectively, i.e. earlier to the enactment of N.C.T.E. Act. Prayer of the petitioners is that they are also entitled for earlier relief as allowed to the petitioners in the earlier writ application. In the facts and circumstances of the case and also that the petitioners have already filed their representation before the District Superintendent of Education, Muzaffarpur which is still pending for consideration, the impugned orders contained in 3 Annexures-3 & 3/A are quashed. The respondent No. 5 is directed to consider petitioner’s case in the light of the order passed by this court in C.W.J.C. No. 10370 of 2008 and analogous cases. In case petitioners’ case is similar, they should be allowed similar relief. This writ application is allowed. AKV/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)