IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.20395 of 2010 RAJ KISHORE SINGH, SON OF LATE VEER SINGH R/O VILLAGE-SOMGARH, P.O.SATHI, PS.-SATHI, DISTT-WEST CHAMPARAN AT PRESENT RESIDING AT P.O-VIJITPUR VAYA-GULWARA, MADHUWAN, P.S.MADHWAN-DIST-EAST CHAMPARAN…………………………...PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THRU ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE CHAIRMAN BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD HIGHER SECONDARY, 3. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD, HIGHER SECONDARY, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM- DISTRICT CHIEF EXAMINATION CONTROLLER, EAST CHAMPARAN, MOTIHARI 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER-CUM- DISTRICT CHIEF EXAMINATION CONTROLLER, EAST CHAMPARAN, MOTIHARI 6. THE SUBDIVISIONAL OFFICER SADAR, EAST CHAMPARAN, MOTIHARI. 7. SRI ANUGRAH NARAYAN SINGH COLLEGE, MOTIHARI THRU THE PRINCIPAL NAMELY, SRI ARBIND KUMAR SINGH, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER. 8. BABA MUST RAM INTER COLLEGE DHAKA MOTIHARI THRU ITS PRINCIPAL 9. GUNJAN DEVI W/O DINESH PRASAD, R/O VILLAGE-BHIKALIA, P.S.LAKHOURA DIST-EAST CHAMPARAN, MOTIHARI. 10. ANITA KUMARI D/O KAILASH SAHNI VILLAGE-HEHKAGAON, P.S.GOVINDGANJ, DIST- EAST CHAMPARAN. 11. AMIT UPADHYAY S/O RAM SURAT UPADHYAY, R/O VILLAGE-SOURAHA SAKUL TOLA, P.S.HARSIDHI DIST-EAST CHAMPARAN. 12. SAVITA KUMARI D/O NOW KNOWN, R/O VILLAGE-GAMHARIA, P.S.DARPA, DIST-EAST CHAMPARAN. 13. AKHTAR ALI S/O ABDULESH DUWAN R/O 2 04/ 25-Jan-2011 VILLAGE-GAMHARIA, P.S.JAGDISHPUR, DIST- WEST CHAMPARAN……………….RESPONDENTS ----------- For petitioner: Mr. Prabhakar Singh, Advocate For Board : Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate Mrs. Binita Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. A. Amanullah, G.A.-4 Mr. A.K. Prasad, AC to G.A.-4 ------------ Heard the parties. 2. In this writ petition which has been filed by way of Public Interest Litigation, the petitioner has prayed for appropriate action by the Bihar School Examination Board, High Secondary for wrong acts done by the authorities of two colleges in East Champaran who have been made Respondent-7 and 8. It has been alleged that no examination should have been held in the college of Respondent No.7 and therefore the examination held in the year 2010 treating Respondent No.7 as a centre was a wrong act for which action should be taken against the concerned authorities of the colleges as well as against the students who appeared in the examination from that centre and who have been declared passed. In particular, a grievance was raised that some students were found indulging in corrupt practices 3 which led to filing of an FIR but the Board has published their results also. 3. On behalf of the Board a counter affidavit has been filed disclosing that results of the concerned students who were allegedly involved in corrupt practices have been cancelled and correct facts regarding there being no recognition in favour of Respondent No.7 has also been published in newspapers. It is further stand of the Board that the matter is being looked into for taking remedial actions. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner wants this Court to order for cancellation of results of all the students who were permitted to take examination from the centre which was wrongly situated in the premises of Respondent No.7. 5. Considering all the facts and circumstances and interest of the students involved, this Court is not persuaded to go into the issue raised on behalf of the petitioner with respect to result of all the students concerned. At the fist instance, the issue involved must be considered and decided by the Board itself. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 4 Board to consider all the relevant aspects and act as per law. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)