IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5987 of 2010 1. KEDAR NATH PANDEY S/O LATE RAM CHANDRA PANDEY R/O VILL.- KONAR, P.O.- KONAR, P.S.- SHEOSAGAR, DISTT.- ROHTAS, SASARAM 2. JAGAR NATH PANDEY S/O LATE RAM CHANDRA PANDEY R/O VILL.- KONAR, P.O.- KONAR, P.S.- SHEOSAGAR, DISTT.- ROHTAS, SASARAM 3. KAMESHWAR PANDEY S/O LATE RAM CHANDRA PANDEY R/O VILL.- KONAR, P.O.- KONAR, P.S.- SHEOSAGAR, DISTT.- ROHTAS, SASARAM Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION, ROHTAS, SASARAM 4. THE CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, SHEOSAGAR AT SHEOSAGAR, P.S.- SHEOSAGAR, DISTT.- ROHTAS, SASARAM 5. HARI BANSH SINGH S/O LATE SOHAN SINGH R/O VILL. AND P.O.- KONAR, P.S.- SHEOSAGAR, DISTT.- ROHTAS, SASARAM 6. SURYA BANSH SINGH S/O LATE SOHAN SINGH R/O VILL. AND P.O.- KONAR, P.S.- SHEOSAGAR, DISTT.- ROHTAS, SASARAM with CWJC No.6016 of 2010 1. KEDAR NATH PANDEY S/O LATE RAM CHANDRA PANDEY R/O VILL.- KONAR, P.O.- KONAR, P.S.- SHEOSAGAR, DISTT.- ROHTAS, SASARAM 2. JAGAR NATH PANDEY S/O LATE RAM CHANDRA PANDEY R/O VILL.- KONAR, P.O.- KONAR, P.S.- SHEOSAGAR, DISTT.- ROHTAS, SASARAM 3. KAMESHWAR PANDEY S/O LATE RAM CHANDRA PANDEY R/O VILL.- KONAR, P.O.- KONAR, P.S.- SHEOSAGAR, DISTT.- ROHTAS, SASARAM Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION, ROHTAS, SASARAM 4. THE CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, SHEOSAGAR, AT SHEOSAGAR, P.S. SHEOSAGAR, DISTT.- ROHTAS, SASARAM 5. MUKTI PANDEY S/O LATE BASHISTHA PANDEY R/O VILL.- KONAR, P.O.- KONAR, P.S.- SHEOSAGAR, DISTT.- ROHTAS, SASARAM 6. KAMTA PANDEY S/O LATE BASHISTHA PANDEY R/O VILL.- KONAR, P.O.- KONAR, P.S.- SHEOSAGAR, DISTT.- ROHTAS, SASARAM 7. BISHNUDATTA PANDEY S/O LATE BASHISTHA PANDEY R/O VILL.- KONAR, P.O.- KONAR, P.S.- SHEOSAGAR, DISTT.- ROHTAS, SASARAM 2 8. PAPU PANDEY S/O LATE RAMESHWAR PANDEY R/O VILL.- KONAR, P.O.- KONAR, P.S.- SHEOSAGAR, DISTT.- ROHTAS, SASARAM ----------- 02/ 08.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners in the two applications states that the Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna was to consider Consolidation Revision Case Nos. 476 of 1985 and 470 of 1985 along with the records of Consolidation Revision Case No. 473 of 1985, as would appear from order dated 30.10.2007, passed in Consolidation Revision Case No. 476 of 1985 and 1.10.2007 passed in Consolidation Revision Case No. 470 of 1985, but from perusal of the entire order sheet of the two revision case would indicate that without availability of the records of Consolidation Revision Case No. 473 of 1985, the aforesaid two Consolidation Revision Case Nos. 476, 470 of 1985 were disposed of under order dated 4.6.2009, Annexure-7 although petitioners remained under impression that the two revision cases will not be disposed of until the records of Consolidation Revision Case No. 473 of 1985 is made available. 3. Let the aforesaid aspect of the matter be highlighted before the Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna by seeking review of the order dated 4.6.2009, Annexure-7 by which the aforesaid two revision applications have been disposed of after notice to the private Respondents, who were opposite parties before the Director, Consolidation. The 3 Director, Consolidation should consider the submission and pass appropriate orders in the light of the order sheet maintained in the two revision applications. 4. The two writ applications are, accordingly, disposed of. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)