IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 469 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 1920 OF 1989 Killick Nixon Ltd. ...... ......Plaintiff. V/s Mrs.Geeta S.Parikh & Anr. ...... ......Defendants. Mr.Shekhar Shetye i/by Mr.Rajesh Patel, Adv. For the plaintiff. Mr.K.M.Sangani, Adv. For the defendant Nos.1A to 1D. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 26.6.08 PC: By this chamber summons the plaintiff seeks to amend the plaint to the extent it relates to the valuation and the payment of court-fees. This amendment is proposed by way of abundant precaution in view of objection to the valuation of the suit. The plaintiff seeks to amend the plaint by paying maximum court-fee as was leviable at the time of filing of the suit. Prayer for amendment is opposed. In my view the amendment is formal in nature and does not go to prejudice the defendants in any manner whatsoever. Hence in the interest of justice allowing the proposed amendment rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) of the chamber summons. Amendment to be carried within a period of two weeks after paying deficit court-fees. Chamber summons stands disposed of.