IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 26TH AUGUST 2011 / 4TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23286 of 2011(I) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- KRISHNANKUTTY, S/O.KANDA, AGED 50 YEARS, THANDANGATTIL HOUSE, KOONOOR, KORATTY, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN, SRI.BENNY ANTONY PAREL, MRS.S.SREELAKSHMY. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR- 680 003. 2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, CHIRANGARA, KORATTY, THRISSUR- 680 308. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, CHALAKUDY THRISSUR- 680 307. 4. TAHASILDAR, MUKUNDAPURAM THRISSUR- 691 585. 5. VILLAGE OFFICER, MURINGOOR, THEKKUMURI, KORATTY- 680 308, THRISSUR. 6. MRS. BHARATHI, W/O.RAMAN, THAIKKODATHIL HOUSE KOONOOR DESOM, MURINGOOR THEKKUMURI VILLAGE, MURINGOOR TALUK, 680 316, THRISSUR. R1 TO R5 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.M.J. RAJASHREE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/08/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 23286 of 2011(I) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 18/03/2003. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE SURVEY PLAN AND BTR. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DATED 20/02/2010. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 10/01/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 23286 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of August , 2011 J U D G M E N T The allegation in this writ petition is that the 6th respondent has encroached into the Government property and that despite having made Ext.P4 complaint to the 3rd respondent, he has not taken any action on it. If as stated by the petitioner such an application made by him has been received and is pending, it is directed that the 3rd respondent shall take necessary action thereon with notice to the 6th respondent and as expeditiously as possible at any rate within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the concerned authority for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge