^- PETinONER ^f^: ff^ ^yy RESPON&ENTS IN THE HI6H COURT OF <:HH4TTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W<P. (C) N0. 3 j O /2Q08 Baldau Ram Chandrakar, son of Bahadur Chandrakar, aged about 46 years, resident of Village Rakhi, Tehsil Arang, District Raipur. 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Ministry of 6eneral Administration bepartment/ Revenue, &.K.S. Bhaw/an, Mantralaya, Raipur. 2. New Raipur bevelopment Authority, Raipur, through its Chief Executive Officer, New Raipur Development / Authonty, Raipur. '3. Union Bank of Ind+a, Devpuri Branch, through its Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, Devpuri, District Raipur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INt>IA \,. ''! <f/3 <<? HIGHCOURTQF CHHATTISGARH AT 81LASPUR WRIT PETITION (0 N0. 910 OF2008 Petitioner Baidau Ram Chandrakar Versus Resoondents Slate ofChhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTION OF INDI (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Vivek Chopra.Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer forthe State ORDER(ORAU (Passed on 21st day of Juiy, 2010) This is an application for withdrawal of the petition with a prayer that, if the grievance stiil survives, the petitioner may be granted liberty to take recourse to appropriate forum. Learned counselappearing for otherside has no objection. Application is ordered as prayed for. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the abovestated liberty. r Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok