CRM-M No. 37099 of 2010 **** S.P.Singh vs. State of Haryana Present: Mr.Sumeet Sheokand, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana. Mr.B.S.Malik, Advocate for the complainant. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 355 dated 01.07.2010, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC registered at Police Station City Gurgaon. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that co-accused of the petitioner viz. Lakshmi Devi has been granted bail. However, I find that the petitioner is the main accused and learned counsel has not been able to explain as to in what circumstances the money which was paid by him was refunded back to him. In this view of the matter the present is not a case where the concession of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner. Dismissed. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE March 04, 2011 sunita