IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO : 3223 of 2009 Petition under Section 227 of CPC.,against the order dated 10.2.2009 in T.O.P.NO :893 of 2008 on the file of the court of the Principal District Judge, Ranga Reddy District. Between: Ramesh Kardass S/o Satyanarayana R/o MIGH 30, APHB COlony Medchal ( Village & Mandal ), R.R.District ..... PETITIONER AND Singireddy Laxma Reddy S/o S. Narayana Reddy R/o Gawdavelly (V) Medchal Mandal, R.R.District .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.MAHENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : ORDER: This revision petition is filed by the petitioner, who is the respondent in TOP No.893 of 2008 against the order dated 19.2.2009 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Ranga Reddy District. By the above said order the Court below allowed the petition filed by the respondent herein under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to transfer the suit O.S.No.25 of 2005 from the file of II Additional Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Ranga Reddy District at Medchal to the file of Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Ranga Reddy District at Medchal for trial along with the suit O.S.No.454 of 2004 pending on its file. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. A perusal of the impugned order indicates that the Court below considered the issue in the transfer petition and found that the subject matter of the suits filed by both the parties as well as the parties themselves are same and the issues that arise for adjudication in both the suits are also same and since the evidence to be adduced in both the suits will also be one and the same, allowed the petition giving reasons, which, in my considered opinion do not require interference at the hands of this court in this revision petition. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed. N.V.RAMANA,J Dt.13.8.2009 msv