IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) No. 9247 of 2008 Decided on 18.6.2011. Rajesh Jistu and ors. ……..Petitioners vs. State of H.P. and ors. ……Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice (oral). The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- “i) That the impugned order dated 7.8.2002 (Annexure A/2) passed by the respondents may kindly be quashed and set aside and thereby directing the respondents to release the benefits as per Annexure A/1. ii) That the respondents may further be directed to pay the amount deducted w.e.f. June 2002 till February, 2003 and further may kindly be directed to pay the difference of salary which has been deducted by the respondents illegally alongwith interest at the rate of 18% per annum till its actual realization. iii) That the respondents may further be directed to release all the benefits as admissible to a regular appointee i.e. vocational salary from the date of their appointments alongwith other allowances with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date it fell due till its actual realization.” 2 2. It is not in dispute that the issue raised in this petition is covered by the decision of this Court in CWP (T) No. 14232 of 2008, titled Nek Ram and others vs. State of H.P. and others. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that the said judgment has become final and has been implemented. In light of the above decision, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.2 to extend similar treatment in the case of the petitioners herein also after verification of the facts in case the petitioners herein are also similarly situated. The needful shall be done within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the second respondent by the petitioner concerned. 3. In view of disposal of main petition, all pending application (s), if any also stand disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Sharma) Judge. June 18, 2011 (LSP/pankaj)