THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CONTEMPT CASE No. 1208 of 2009 Date: 18.09.2009 Between: Sk. Hussain ………….. Petitioner and Food Corporation of India Rep.byits Executive Director, Chennai-6 & others. …….Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CONTEMPT CASE No. 1208 of 2009 O R D E R: This Contempt Case has been instituted by the writ petitioner complaining that the order passed by this Court on 18th June 2009 in Writ Petition No. 10885 of 2009 has not been complied with by the respondents. When this Contempt Case is taken up on 28.08.2009, Sri B. Anjaneyulu, learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation took time to secure necessary instructions in the matter. On the last occasion, i.e. on 11.09.2009, he has produced before me a copy of the order dated 09.09.2009 pointing out that when the Zonal Promotion Committee took up the cases of Category IV Employees, working in the South Zone of F.C.I. for promotion to the post of Assistant Grade-III (Depot) under 30% quota meant for the category of employees, the case of the writ petitioner has also been taken up for consideration. His name was figuring at Sl. No. 186 of the list of qualified candidates. He was an unreserved category candidate. 173 unreserved category candidates, 34 SC category candidates have been found eligible and they were accordingly promoted. The last unreserved candidate selected and promoted is Sri E.K. Mohan Kumar, Daftry, whose name appeared at Sl. No. 184 of the eligible candidates. There is one more candidate by name Sri M.K. Kulkarni, Head Watchman, who is figuring at Sl. No. 185 of the list. Therefore, the Corporation has not violated the directions issued by this Court on 18th June 2009 in Writ Petition No. 10885 of 2009. It has been clearly held out by the Corporation that the case of the writ petitioner along with other eligible candidates will be taken up for promotion as and when next round of promotions are due and taken up. In view of this, I do not see any justifiable reason to entertain this Contempt Case and hence, it is dismissed. ---------------------------------- (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) 18th September 2009 ksld