IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR .<::W6 ^- WRTF PETmON (S) N0. ' "'" /2010 PETITIONERS .6^3^ v^-S^l/- • ^uS^y' ^ -^/^^w ^^y ^y^ <^''' Jis" V !€yV ' <^'y' ir Ram Singh Raj S/o Ratan Singh Raj aged about 57 Years Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Boys Middle School Champa, Block - Bamhnidih, Distt. Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) 2-^Puni Ram T'hawait S/o Mangluram Thawait aged about 60 Years Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Boys Middle School Chatnpa., Block - Bamhnidih, Distt. Janjgir - ChampafC.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS; . l'. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2^ The Disti-ict Educatioh Officer, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) S.-^The Block Education officer Block- Bamhnidih, Distt. Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) WRITUNDER ARTICLE2260FTHECONSTrTUTIONOF INDIA ^b WRW ^' [-HC-22 3!B» "SfESSy •SV ''flWM^, ^WIS. hwwf. Sff^ 'VRK 's^ 'i-{W\v\'l1. 0'nl'y'le. !»«'ii*<^< 31T^?T XRrg, *ill*iCn a»*<|ch^....W£X^A,^3^(a Isrc^r- SII^T'^1 R-li'* 3D^?I ^RNr^rfta (.. STI^ITOIWHftd SB : HQN'BLBBtR. JUSTICE PRITINtSBR DIWAKBR 03.12.2010 Shri Ajay Kumar Barek, counsep Shri A.V.Shridhar, P.L. forthe Grievance of the petitioners in| petitioners were appointed as Assistai of Rs. 150 for a period of one year adfl they were granted regular pay scale of Contention of the counsel for entitled for regular pay scale with appointment and their case is decisions passed by this Court and al' M.P.State Administrative Tribunal, (Madfaukant Yadu & 56 Othen Vs. it has been held that similarly placed| pay scale from the date oftheir initial| It is not disputed by both the up by the State to the Apex Court bt)< by the Apex Court upholding the dec| that the Teachers/Assistant Teachejrs scale from the date of their initial apjjpintisent In view of the above submissil parties, the petition is diaposed 4 petitioners are granted liberty to mal^i in the Ught of the aforesaid 29.12.2008 (Annexure P/2) and in directed to consider their case ok t^1^[cl<11l HTt1nf ^ 'f^^ <P;tl^t< ^siPOTsgi^?! P for the petitioners. Etate. |the preaent petition is that the |it Teachers oa a fbced pay scale after compietion of probation, iRs. 169-300. |the petitioners is that they are leffect from the date of initial squjarely covered with number of io thejudgment rendered by the jjabalpur in OJL No. 274S/89 ^tate cf M.P. & Othen) wherein [teachers are entitled for regular lappointment. j^art ^rties that the matter was taken t the appeal was also dismissed sion of the Tribunal to the efiect are entitled for reguiar pay. 3n made by the counsel for the in the same terms i.e. the a representation, if so advised, jud^ment and the ciroular dated i, the concemed respondent is its own merits and in its tilm ! •SA ^fjS-'l ( I fiE }HRT T ! f i ? ? ! ®F [-HC-22 ^yf ^ 's^ 's^ •wt{\v\tl, 9'ol'M'is. f'K'ii'yy 3TR(?T 'qsrg; WWIT ai11<») ' WI" 2001' "firc^T' sn^r^T R-fi.'b sn^i ^TIW^ftcl perspective. If the petitioners stand passed by the State Adnainistrate (supra) and subsequently confinned Leave Petition (Ci^ilj No. 6892/93 petitioners may be entitled to same cjn the saine footing as per order ITribunal in Madhukant Yadu 1|>y the Supreme Court in Special |by order dated 3.1.1995, the accordingly. rejUef It is expected from the state afithorities to pass suitable order after due scrutiny of the facts, It is made clear that this Couit on merits ofthecase and the authort to decide the representation strictly i4 I: has not expressed any opinion ^y concemed would be at Uberty acconlance with law. cl'ihFcl^ll tlHCll*'^ [s^ •t.pi|t$!< ^r 3lf;OT sn^l Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge •;\ '^^fw