IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 5077 of 2002 BETWEEN: 1 Ummul Qura Education Society Rep By Its Chairman Mohammed Jaffar S/o Late Lal Mohammed, R/o Regency Palace, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. 2 Nizam Institute Eng & Technology Rep By Its Chairman Mohd. Jaffar S/o Late Lal Mohd. Jaffar, Deshmukhi Village, Pochampally, Nalgonda District. 3 Mohd. Jaffar S/o Late Lal Mohd. Jaffar, R/o 10-5-8/8A/6, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONERS AND 1 Govt of A.P. Education Dept, Rep By Its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Commissioner of Technical Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 Convenor, Admissions, EAMCET, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 4 Society for Networking for Excellence In Technical Education O/o The Commissioner, Department of Technical Education, D- Block, V&VI Floors, BRKR Govt Offices Complex, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order direction or Writ particularly one in the nature of Writ of "Mandamus" declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in issuing GO Rt.No.1011 dt.29.12.2000 as being without jurisdiction apart from being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and set aside the same and further declare the action of the respondents in retaining part of the collected fees for payment to 'SONET' as illegal and unconstitutional and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.S.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER: Mr. Farhan Azam Khan, learned counsel representing Mr. S. Niranjan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous and there survives no cause to be adjudicated. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J August 5, 2008 DSK