1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.1038 of 2007 (Dr. Vidyasagar Kishanrao Biradar v. Secretary, Department of Agricultural Research & Education, and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Shri A.D. Mohgaonkar, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri A.R. Atrey, Advocate for Respondents No.3 and 4. Coram : A.H. Joshi & R.C. Chavan, JJ. Dated : 24 th July, 2007 1. Respondents No.3 and 4, who have filed affidavit-in- reply, are represented through Advocate Shri A.R. Atrey. 2. The learned Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4 makes a statement that :- (a) The application, which has barely been forwarded under the orders of the Court, shall be supported by forwarding appropriate service record and endorsement for enabling consideration of petitioner's application. (b) The application of the petitioner shall be scrutinized according to the rules and if the petitioner is found eligible, in that event, he shall be called for interview. If the facts pertaining to 2 the petitioner's service record support, the proper certificate relating to vigilance or as to pendency of any disciplinary case, etc., will be furnished to the petitioner for production at the time of interview. 3. These statements sufficiently protect the petitioner. Hence, no further orders are necessary. 4. The petition stands disposed of. JUDGE. JUDGE. Pdl.