1 CRA NO.91/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.91 OF 2011 1) Suresh s/o Manoharrao Kottawar (died L.Rs.) 1A) Sunita w/o Suresh Kottawar and others. - APPLICANTS VERSUS 1) Sow.Vidya w/o Shyam Yerawar and others. - RESPONDENTS ***** Mr.Raviraj R.Chandak, Advocate for Applicants; Mr.Mr.G.O.Wattamwar, Adv. h/for Mr.SG Rudrawar, Adv. For Resp.Nos.1 to 5 ----- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 14th NOVEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The learned Judge allowed the plaintiff to withdraw the suit to the extent of two houses. Though there was earlier direction dated 9.12.2010 asking the plaintiff to deposit required court fee as per law in the court on or before the adjourned date and failure by the plaintiff to deposit such court fee, the plaint shall be deemed to be rejected, liberty is 2 CRA NO.91/2011 available to the petitioner herein as defendant to prosecute the order dated 9.12.2010 by urging the learned Judge, i.e. CJJD, Manwat to act upon the order dated 9.12.2010. 3) With these observations, I do not see any illegality in the order dated 24.1.2011, allowing the plaintiff to delete two houses being House Nos.6/4/17 and 6/4/18, CRA dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/