-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6120 OF 2010. Padmavati A. Shinde & Ors. ..Petitioners. Versus Prabhakar K. Shinde & Others. ..Respondents. Mr. P. B. Gujar for the petitioners. Mr. Sumit Khaire i/b Mr. P. N. Joshi for respondents. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : August 11, 2010. P. C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. Petition pertains to the recording of mutation entry. It is settled position of law that the mutation entry does not create or extinguish rights of the party and the same are recorded for the fiscal purposes only. A reference can be made to the decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Balwant Singh & Another v/s. Daulat Singh, reported in 1997 (7) SCC 137. Remedy of the parties is to approach the Civil Court to get adjudicated their rights. In the present case the suit for specific performance was already filed by the petitioner. Though same was dismissed, First Appeal is pending in which the order of status quo is passed in favour of the petitioner. srp -: 2 :- Furthermore, clause (3) of the operative part of the impugned order makes it clear that the impugned order will be subject to the order of status quo passed by the High Court in petitioner’s First Appeal. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to entertain the petition and interfere with the impugned order in writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition is therefore dismissed. (R.V. MORE, J.)