IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CRP NO :1641 OF 2010 Between: Reddi Narayana Rao, S/o.Yeruku Naidu ..... PETITIONER AND Venkatu Lakshmi, W/o. V. Narayana Rao & another .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : ORDER :: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CRP NO.1641 OF 2010 ORDER: The grievance of the petitioner in this civil revision petition is that he has filed a petition under Order 21, Rule 96 CPC for ordering symbolic delivery of possession of the petition schedule property as he being the auction purchaser in EP No.44 of 2008 in EP 30 of 2006 in OS No.75 of 1999, but the Court below has not disposed of the same and adjourning the matter from time to time. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petitioner has also filed a memo giving his no objection to allow the claim petitions filed by the existing tenants in EA No.19 of 2009 and 9 of 2010 and, therefore, in all fairness the Court below ought to have disposed of the petition filed by the petitioner for ordering symbolic possession of the petition schedule property. 2. In the light of this submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also to meet the ends of justice, the Court below is directed to dispose of the petition filed by the petitioner after affording opportunity to the parties and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3. With the above directions, the civil revision petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself. _____________________ Ghulam Mohammed, J Dated: 4-6-2010 Nrg.