1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 60 OF 2009 (Istari Bajirao Bansod .v. State of Maharashtra and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri J.M. Shamkuwar, Advocate for the applicant. Shri D.B. Yengal, APP for the respondent No.1/State. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. 03RD OCTOBER, 2011. Heard. A pursis (St) No. 1282 of 2011 is filed by the respondent Nos.2 to 6 submitting that the impugned judgment and order dated 14.10.2008 passed by the learned JMFC, Kuhi in Regular Criminal Case No. 104/2002 was challenged by the respondents before the learned District and Sessions Judge, Nagpur by preferring Criminal Appeal No. 218 of 2008. It is further stated in the pursis that the said Criminal Appeal No. 218 of 2008 was allowed by the judgment and order dated 22.11.2010 passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Nagpur and the accused Nos. 1,2,4 and 5 i.e. respondent Nos.2 to 5 in the present revision are acquitted. It is further stated in the pursis that in view of the decision of the learned District and Sessions Judge in the appeal, the revision has become infructuous. The learned Counsel for the applicant does not dispute the position emerges in the pursis. The copy of the judgment and order in Criminal Appeal No. 218/2008 is also placed on record. In view of the aforesaid facts, the revision stands disposed of as infructuous. JUDGE *rrg.