Cr.MMO No. 150 of 2011. 19.8.2011 Present: Mr. Dharamvir Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. This petition has been filed against the judgement dated 20.4.2011 passed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Mandi in revision petition No. 4 of 2010 affirming the order dated 9.12.2009 passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Court No. 1, Sundernagar in petition No. 299-IV/2006 allowing maintenance of Rs.1000/- per month to respondent No.1 and Rs.700/- per month to respondents No. 2 and 3 each. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that respondent No. 1 of her own is residing with her parents alongwith the children. The petitioner has never refused to maintain the respondents. The petitioner is a poor man, an attempt can be made in this court for settling the dispute between the parties. The scope of Section 482 Cr.P.C. is very limited. The learned Magistrate after appreciation of material on record has allowed the maintenance in favour of the respondents, which has been affirmed by the revisional court. No illegality has been pointed out in the impugned judgement. In case matter is settled between the parties, then petitioner can approach the trial court by filing appropriate application on the basis of changed circumstances. But so far the present petition is concerned, there is no scope for interference, hence the same is dismissed, so also Cr.MP Nos. 590 and 591 of 2011. August 19, 2011. ( Kuldip Singh ), (Hem) Judge.