THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33627 of 2010 Date: 29.09.2011 Between: Gade Vishnuvardhan Reddy And four others. ..... Petitioners AND Government of A.p., Reptd by Its Secretary, Revenue Department, Hyderabad and five others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri J.Prabhakar Counsel for Respondent Nos.3 and 4 : AGP for Roads and Buildings Counsel for respondent Nos.5 and 6: Dr.B.J.S.Mrudulanjali, for Sri P.Bhaskar, Standing Counsel for Railways The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in proposing to form the approach road for RUB at LC No.81 km/437/13-15 at Kazipet, Km 0.4 of Mahaboobabad-Marripadu Road, Warangal District, by taking the gradient of the approaches at 1:33 instead of at 1:20 and taking the ‘0’ at the T- junction of Mahaboobabad – Marripadu road instead of at the RUB site as illegal, arbitrary and irrational. The petitioners seek a direction to the respondents to reassess and plan the project roads for the proposed construction of the RUB duly taking into account all the objections raised by them in this Writ Petition. After arguing the case, Sri J.Prabhakar, leaned counsel for the petitioners, requested for closing the Writ Petition by permitting the petitioners to make a detailed representation to respondent Nos.3 and 4 suggesting alternatives in order to avoid digging of the road at which the petitioners’ shops are located, and direct the said respondents to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioners before proceeding further. Having regard to this submission of the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of without going into the merits of the case in the following terms: - (1) that the petitioners shall make a detailed representation to respondent Nos.3 and 4 within ten days from today; (2) that respondent No.4 shall submit a detailed report on the feasibility to respondent No.3 within two weeks of receipt of such representation; (3) that within two weeks of receipt of such report, respondent No.3 shall consider and dispose of the petitioners’ representation in the light of the report of respondent No.4 and communicate the same to the petitioners. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.Nos.42618 of 2010 and 8994 of 2011 filed by the petitioners for interim reliefs are disposed of as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 29th September 2011 Note: Issue CC by Monday, B/o DR