IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.9120 of 2008 Between: P.Ramesh, S/o. Ramachander Rao, aged 32 years, business, R/o. H.No.1-27-33/7, Ram Naresh, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Sarpanch Grampanchayath, Bijinepally Mandal, NagarKurnook (Tq), Mahaboobnagar District. 2 Panchayat Secretary, Grampanchayat, Bijinepally. Bijinepally Mandal, NagarKurnook (Tq), Mahaboobnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission to the petitioner to construct home in plots admeasuring 660 Sq.Yards and 154 Sq.Yards total admeasuring 814 Sq.Yards Sy.No.279/AA situated at Bijinepally Mandal, Nagar Kurnool(Tq), Mahaboob Nagar District and passsuch other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. A.SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. G.ELISHA The Court made the following: THE HONBLE ’Ms, JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.9120 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to the Gram Panchayat to grant permission to the petitioner to construct a house in the plots owned by him in Sy.No.279/A of Bijinapally Mandal, Nagarkurnool (Taluq), Mahaboobnagar District. It is stated by the petitioner that though he made an application for grant of permission on 7.2.2008, the respondents failed to consider the same and the permission as sought by him has not been granted so far. Sri G. Elisha, who accepted notice for the respondents, under instructions, stated that the petitioner’s application has already been considered and since it is found that there is a dispute with regard to the title, the permission as sought by the petitioner has not been granted. However, it is conceded by the learned counsel that the said decision has not been communicated to the petitioner. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to communicate to the petitioner the decision with regard to the petitioner’s request for building permission within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In case the petitioner is aggrieved, it is open to him to challenge such order by working out appropriate remedy as available under law. No costs. 12.06.2008. Kgr