IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39164 of 2009 Kallu Yadav, son of Suryadev Yadav, R/o Village-Simri, P.S. Bihta, District-Patna. ………………......Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ……………………………Opposite Party. ----------- 3. 09. 02. 2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehended his arrest in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 217/09, registered under Sections 366, 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is alleged for taking away the deceased along with others to the house of Ramesh Yadav, where she was killed by pressing her neck. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner that no external injury was found falsify the allegation, rather in the case, deceased was in love affair with co-accused Ramesh Yadav making pressure to marry her which was not accepted by Ramesh Yadav and then she consumed poison and petitioner is apprehending his arrest never can be justified. In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner, namely, Kallu Yadav, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of one month from today, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M., Danapur, in connection with 2 Bihta P.S. Case No. 217/09, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. m.p. (Mandhata Singh,J.)