HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 15th March, 2011 1st Bail Application No. 136 of 2011 Order on the bail application of the accused. Saukeen S/o Khalil Ahemad ……. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party In Case Crime No. 38 of 2011 U/S 452, 366, 511 and 307 I.P.C. Police Station Ranipur District Haridwar Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Shri Sanjeev Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant and Shri S.S. Adhikari, the learned A.G.A. for the State. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, the applicant is one of the four persons who were involved in trying to kidnap a girl but failed in their attempt. Three persons were caught red handed and the applicant escaped. Even though, the applicant was not named in the F.I.R. but his accomplice named him and was accordingly nailed and arrested. Considering the fact that the applicant was not a jilted lover but was only accompanying the jilted lover in an attempt to kidnap the girl coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal history, and, without expressing anything on the merit of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 38 of 2011, U/S 452, 366, 511 and 307 I.P.C, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 15.03.2011 Shiv