IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7520 of 2011 BABLU KUMAR @ BABLU YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 08.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 179 of 2008 registered under Sections 177, 178, 179,452, 504, 307, 324 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Subsequently Section 302 of the I.P.C. was also added. It is alleged against the petitioner to have caused fire arm injury to the informant. It is submitted that the date of occurrence is 11.08.2008 at 6.30 P. M. whereas the fardbeyan was recorded on 12.08.2008 at 11.00 A.M.and F. I. R. was registered on 12.08.2008 at 5.30 P. M. which not only clouds the bonafide of the prosecution but it suggests the improvement in prosecution version. Admittedly, the informant 2 died after forty five days of the occurrence. Hence, it is submitted that prima facie the case under Section 302 I. P. C. is not made out against the petitioner. From the impugned order, it appears that the victim was a veteran criminal. It is submitted that other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail. Since the victim died after forty five days of the occurrence due to septiceamia hence, it is a fit case for grant of regular bail. Let the petitioner surrender and pray for regular bail before the learned court below when the learned court below will try to dispose off the regular bail application of the petitioner preferably on the same day considering the fact that the victim died after forty five days of the occurrence due to septiceamia, delayed lodging of the F. I. R. and others have been granted anticipatory bail. With this observation, this 3 application is disposed off. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)