C.R.No.6066 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.6066 of 2009 Date of Decision : 22.10.2009 Jaspal Singh ...Petitioner Versus M/s Harjit Traders ...Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the learned Executing Court on 18.7.2009, whereby the objections to the execution of the decree preferred by the petitioner were dismissed. The only argument raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an appeal against the decree is pending, therefore, during the pendency of such appeal, decree shall not be permitted to be executed. It is admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Appellate Court has not granted any stay in respect of execution of the decree. Therefore, the Executing Court is bound to execute the decree granted by the learned trial Court. Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the decreetal amount should be permitted to be deposited in installments. It is open to the petitioner to make such a request before the learned Executing Court for payment of the decreetal amount in C.R.No.6066 of 2009 2 installments. As and when any such request is made by the petitioner, the leaned Executing Court shall consider the same in accordance with law. With the said observations, the present revision petition is disposed of. 22.10.2009 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE