IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE SECOND APPEAL NO. 894 OF 2004 SECOND APPEAL NO. 894 OF 2004 SECOND APPEAL NO. 894 OF 2004 Popat Krishna Pawar & ors. ... Appellants V/s Balkrishna Namdeo Patil & ors. ... Respondents Miss Gauri Godse for the appellants. Shri G. S. Godbole for the respondents. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. DATED : 18TH JAN., 2005 DATED : 18TH JAN., 2005 DATED : 18TH JAN., 2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard both sides. 2. This matter has come up for speaking to the minutes. The appeal was decided on 14th December, 2004. The operative order was issued stating that the status-quo granted earlier shall continue for a period of four weeks from the date of the order. When the judgment was complete, it appears that the status-quo was continued for the period of eight weeks which was correctly recorded. Therefore, the operative part of the order issued separately shall stand modified to that extent mentioning status-quo to continue for a period of eight weeks from the date of the order. 2 .....