IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24969 of 2011 Jayant Kumar Singh, S/O Madhusudan Prasad Singh, R/O Vill- Bariyarur, P.S.- Raja Pakar, Distt- Vaishali. ….. Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 18.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for the complainant. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Parihar P.S. Case No. 134 of 2010 for the offences punishable under Section 498A, 379, 323 of the Indian Penal Code and 4/3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, is named accused in this case being husband of the informant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. Submission is that prior to filing of present case, petitioner has already field an application bearing Divorce Case No. 104 of 2009 under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking dissolution of marriage and decree of divorce, wherein informant has entered into appearance and matter is being further prosecuted. There is another application filed on behalf of informant under Section 145 of the Cr.P.C., but there is no order as regard to ad interim maintenance till date. However, in order to avoid further 2 submission petitioner is ready to pay a sum of Rs. 500/- (five hundred only) per month to the informant by way of interim maintenance, subject to any order on the point by the competent Court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on the event of filing of an application before the court below stating such intentions as stated above and begin with the payment, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Parihar P.S. Case No. 134 of 2010, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years of till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation or even on single default in payment, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Bhardwaj (Akhilesh Chandra, J)