IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1963 of 2009 TARA KUMARI w/O SHRI KANHAIYA SAH R/O VILLAGE BHEKHPURWA, PO. LAHEJI, PS-PACHRUKHI,DISTT-SIWAN -------------------------- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SIWAN 3. THE D.D.C, SIWAN 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION SUPERINTENDENT,SIWAN 5. THE B.D.O.PACHRUKHI BLOCK, SIWAN 6. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER,SIWAN 7. THE BLOCK PRAMUKH –CUM-CHAIRMAN, PRAKHAND NIYAJAN SAMITI, PACHRUKHI, SIWAN---------RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 9.2.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Annexure-7 dated 1st July, 2008 passed by the D.D.C. is the speaking order with regard to inclusion of the petitioner on the post of Prakhand Sikschika after the date of counseling which became a matter of dispute. The speaking order has now been passed against the petitioner holding that the B.D.O. had no business to allow counseling of the present petitioner after the selection process and the merit list having been already decided. The Court finds the order contained in annexure-7 to be fair, logical and there is no element of arbitrariness emerging from the same. In fact, the Court is of the opinion that any indulgence shown to the petitioner would be only granting undue advantage to her detrimental to the interest of the selected candidates. This writ application has no merit and it is dismissed accordingly. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)