( 1 ) Cri.Apln3452-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3452 OF 2010 1. Raosaheb s/o Manaji Shelke 2. Abhijit Raosaheb Shelke 3. Sau. Sarika w/o Abhijit Shelke 4. Sudhakar Mahadeo Mehetre R/o Jai Vishwabharati Colony, Aurangabad. APPLICANTS VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra 2. Gokul Nanasaheb Aglave, R/o Savali Vihir (Bk.), Tq. Rahata, Dist. Ahmednagar. RESPONDENTS .... Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav, advocate for the applicants. Mr. B.J. Sonawane, APP for the respondent/State. Mr. N.R. Bhavar, advocate for the respondent No. 2. .... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 9th December, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard learned advocates for the parties and learned A.P.P. 2. The applicants are apprehending their arrests in ( 2 ) Cri.Apln3452-10 context of Criminal Misc. Application No. 123/2010 filed against them in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate (F.C.), Kopargaon for the offence of cheating and forgery, etc. 3. The respondent No. 2 filed the private complaint against the applicants alleging that they manipulated a false and fabricated will-deed purportedly executed by Vatsalabai in respect of her properties including an agricultural land. 4. A civil Suit is also pending between the parties. It appears that the Tahsildar has decided in favour of the applicants and the revenue entry is restored in their name. The learned advocate for the respondent No. 2 submits that the R.T.S. Appeal No. 75/2010 is preferred by the respondent No. 2. 5. Considering the rival submissions, it prima facie appears that the complaint is outcome of civil dispute between the parties. The fabrication of the alleged will-deed is yet ascertained and established. Under these circumstances, the application is allowed in terms of the interim order dated 30th August, 2010, and on further condition that as and when ( 3 ) Cri.Apln3452-10 required, the applicants shall make themselves available before the Investigating Officer in order to give specimen of their signatures, handwriting and to cooperate with the Investigating Officer during the course of the investigation. [V.R. KINGAONKAR] JUDGE NPJ/criapln3452-10