THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No.1297 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioners are the tenants, in respect of non-residential premises, owned by the respondents, at Kurnool. The respondents filed R.C.C.No.18 of 2004 in the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge- cum-Rent Controller, Kurnool, for eviction, by pleading the grounds of wilful default and bona fide requirement. The trial Court allowed the R.C.C., through judgment, dated 25.07.2007. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioners filed C.M.A.No.2 of 2008 in the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kurnool. The appeal was dismissed, on 23.02.2010. Hence, this revision under Section 22 of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960. Heard Sri V.Hari Haran, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri T.S.Anand, learned counsel for the respondents. Basically, the revision arises out of concurrent judgments rendered by the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority. Be that as it may, the necessity for this Court to deal with the merits of the matter is obviated, on account of the fact that the order of eviction is said to have been executed. Initially, this Court granted interim stay, on 01.04.2010, while ordering notice before admission, and last of such extension was up to 04.07.2010. For one reason or the other, the interim order was not extended thereafter. Hence, the C.R.P. is dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that certain articles, belonging to his clients, are still in the premises. If that be so, they are granted ten days time to remove them. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dated:13.08.2010 GJ