1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10015 OF 2010 Nilesh Krushi Seva Kendra .. PETITIONER VERSUS Sanjay s/o Uttamrao Patil .. RESPONDENT Mr. L.V. Sangit, advocate for the petitioner. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 21 st OCTOBER, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Application tendered by the petitioner seeking amendment to the plaint has been turned down by the trial court in view of order passed on 25-8-2010. Application is tendered by the plaintiff / petitioner herein after recording of evidence of the parties was over and at the stage when the matter was posted for hearing argument of the parties. There is no justifiable reason for tendering the application at the late stage of the proceeding. Trial court was not convinced with the reasons exhibited by the plaintiff. In view of proviso to Rule 17 Order 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it would not be permissible to permit causing amendment after framing of issues and 2 at a late stage as in the instant matter when the suit is posted for hearing arguments of the parties. The view adopted by the trial court is reasonable and proper and does not call for any interference in exercise of powers conferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition stands rejected. 2 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp10015.10.odt