IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3866 of 2005 TRIBENI PANDEY Versus THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS. ----------- 03/ 13.01.2010 Mr. Jitendra Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Board are present. The parties are in agreement that most of the grievances of the petitioner stands settled during the pendency of the proceedings. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, however, submits that he has received the G.P.F. payment after some delay and for which he is entitled to interest as admissible under the Rules. In view of the submissions that the grievance as set out in the writ petition stands redressed during the pendency of the proceedings, except the claim of the interest on belated payment of G.P.F. amount, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the respondent no. 4 with supporting documents/provisions and who shall consider the claim of the petitioner for payment of interest on belated disbursement of G.P.F. amount and if the same is found justified, the admissible amount of interest would be paid to the petitioner within eight weeks of receipt of such representation. The writ petition stands disposed of with the directions/observations aforesaid. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.) 2