Crl.M.No.M-25891 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-25891 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 7, 2010 Prabhjit Singh .....Petitioner v. The State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Sarabjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.46201 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-25891 of 2010 The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.210, dated 17.8.2010, under Sections 420, 406 IPC, registered at Police Station Chherhata, District Amritsar. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully. Brief allegations against the petitioner-accused Prabhjit Singh are that he claiming himself to be the owner of the property in dispute on the basis of agreement dated 21.9.2006 executed in his favour by Gajjan Singh son of Saudagar Singh, executed an agreement to sell the property in dispute in favour of the complainant for a sum of Rs.9,25,000/- and received almost the entire amount of consideration. However, petitioner did not get the sale deed executed in his favour from Gajjan Singh and hence did not execute the sale-deed in favour of the complainant. Hence, these facts prima facie show dishonest intention of present petitioner since the very inception of the agreement in favour of complainant. Hence, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of Crl.M.No.M-25891 of 2010 (O&M) -2- anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused. Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Prabhjit Singh for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 7.9.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge