HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Contempt Case No.307 of 2007 ORDER :: In A.S.M.P.No.2337 of 2006 an interim order was passed to the effect that the respondents therein shall not alienate the suit schedule property, nor shall they create third party interests in any manner. This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents herein have violated the interim orders and they executed various sale deeds. The particulars of the documents are furnished in the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case. The first respondent filed a counter affidavit denying the allegations. He states that he did not execute even a single document, subsequent to the orders of this Court. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. It is important to note certain dates. The first respondent filed O.S.No.104 of 2001 in the Court of VI Additional Senior Civil Judge, Medchal, for the relief of specific performance of an agreement of sale against the petitioners and respondents 2 to 5 herein. The suit was decreed on 25.09.2006. In pursuance of the decree, the respondents 2 to 5 executed a sale deed in favour of the first respondent on 07.10.2006. He, in turn, executed four sale deeds on 07.10.2006 in favour of Suri Babu, E.Ashok, S.Suryanarayana Raju and Sai Baba respectively. The interim order was passed by this Court on 18.11.2006. The first respondent categorically stated that he did not execute any document, subsequent to 18.11.2006. The petitioners furnished a list of documents, which are executed between 18.11.2006 and 24.02.2007. This is on the basis of an encumbrance certificate obtained by them. It was not even pleaded that respondents 2 to 5 have executed the said documents. Therefore, it emerges that there are no bases for the allegations made by the petitioners. The contempt case is accordingly closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J 13th August, 2009 sur