swa? N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATrIsGARH AT (C.G.) w;P. s. No. 5136 [2010 PETITON ERS 01. J“ Prem Lal Vishwakar r 39 years, vS/o— n Vishwakarma, R- il Badhoudi, post— Sw .. Amiliya, Diistrict— Sid Mmes Bhatgaon , Eastern Coalfelds Li SurguJa (C G ) Ramsewak Sahu ag 40 years S/o Surya - Vlllage- BrJahI, P — Beohan, Drstrlct- S Ex— ITI Apprentic Ram Nagar Sub are South Eastern Coal District— Arruppur (. VERSUS 1. / Coal Inia Ltd. d Rao Koka _ 10. Netaji Subhash d, lta (W.B.) through its C / Chalrman-cum—Manag S.E.C.L. Head Qua Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) elds Ltd. eepat Raod Bilaspur C. Dy. Chief‘ Perso e ( ern Calfields L hairman. ing Director,. ' rter, Seepat ' i lrector (Personal), .South Eastern Coal fi S (G) / nal Managr Labour), South East o td Bilaspur (C G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 O CONSTITUTIO PARTICULAR OF THE PEI'ITIONERS As mentioned in the cause title PARTICULAR OF RESPONDENTS As mEntIoned In the cause title RESPON§DNETS g mm I BILAspun ma, aged about Mafer Prasad /o vlag’er udar, PS- ‘ hi (M.P.), Ex- ITI Apprentice (Elect l > rician), Kayani area South mited Drstrlct- ed about dln Sahu R/o O & PS hahdol (MP), e (EIectrICIan), a Hasdeo area, fields Limited, MP.) /.D F THE N ‘ , XI-HC—78 WW Wan—s: W % WWW.L)N°5.9.z. ‘Qft \ 200 mm (Wu) l mmm, I f gamma mawwm S B HON BLE JUSTQE “15R ?RmNK:R DIWAKER §7-$§-49 16 Shn F.S. Khafe, counsei forthe petitioners. Heard. As Shri Praveen Das, Advocaze' who normally appearsfor ihe South Eastern Coalfiews Limited is present 'in the Court, is directed to accept the notice on behaif of the respondents. Counsei for the petitioners mits that the petitioners are quaiified t.T.t. trained apprentice and they ar emitted to benefit of age retaxation in the matter of appointment on the po of General Mazdoor Category —-t. it i$ submitted that issue invotved in t is petition has been decided by the division bench of this Court vide 0rd r dated 29.4.2010 pee-sect in a batch of petitions. copy or which is placed on ecord as Annexure P-r-‘i. in View of the above, at this s age counsei for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdra i the present petition with iiberty to file proper representaiion before the re pendent-No. 2‘ He submits that the respondent No. 2 may be directed t decide their repreeentation in the tight ofthe order passed bythis Court on 9.42010. Counsel for the respondent h s no objection if the petitioner makes any such representation and the same is being decided strictiy in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is di ssed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. in the eventuatity of fitng any such representation by the petitioners before the respondent ‘ . 2 raising ail their grievances, it is s b s i o / \ m . .......................... ‘ 1 m 200 Mmm ammamia? WWW ‘Wmnmviww w27f #aimsnéw expected from the respondent No. ‘g to decide the same considering a}: the factua! and iegai aspect of the case as expediiiousiy as possible. it is made dear that this Cpun has not expg'essed ariy opinion on merits of the case and the au‘thority‘ coacemed weuld be ai iiberty is deckie the representation of the petitionersi st¥ictiy in accordance wiih law. ‘ Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker «m, 2' Judge em m (Wu) x