WP(C) 1610/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY None appears for the petitioner when the case is called. Earlier this case was d ismissed for default on 27.5.2009 but was subsequently restored on a misc. appli cation filed by the writ petitioner. Notwithstanding the earlier experience, none is present from the side of the pet itioner although three learned counsels are representing him, to pursue the matt er. The petitioner claims to be serving as an Assistant Teacher (Hindi) in the non-p rovincialised Bahbari Narshingbari M.E. School has filed the instant petition al leging that he has not been permitted to sign the Attendance Register of the Sch ool since last about 5/6 years. Be that as it may, considering the default of the learned counsels, this case is dismissed for non-prosecution instead of on merit.