cran4482.10 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4482 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICAITN (ST.) NO. 283 OF 2010 Mahadu s/o Maruti Gunde ...Applicant Versus Baliram Kamaji Gunde and others ...Respondents ..... Ms. Pratibha Bharad h/f Smt. Manjusha Ambekar, advocate for applicant Mr. A.M. Gaikwad, advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 Mr. N.R. Shaikh, A.P.P. for respondent No.4 ..... CORAM: A.V. POTDAR, J. DATED: 30TH MARCH, 2011 PER COURT:- 1 By the present application, the applicant prayed for condonation of delay about 489 days caused in preferring criminal revision application questioning the correctness of the judgment and order dated 26.3.2009 passed in criminal appeal No. 6 of 2007 by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge-1, Kandhar whereby allowing the appeal filed by the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 herein questioning correctness of the conviction and sentence in R.C.C. No. 133 of 2001 by learned J.M.F.C. Loha. cran4482.10 -2- 2 For the reasons stated in the application, I find that delay is properly explained. Hence, the delay is condoned. Application for condonation is allowed and disposed of. 3 Office to register criminal revision application St. No. 283 of 2010 and same be listed for admission in due course. ( A.V. POTDAR. J.) rlj/