IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-4220 of 2011 (O and M) Date of Decision : February 11, 2011. Harish ............. Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and another ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. JEYAPAUL. Present:- None. SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL). The petitioner, who has been convicted for an offence under Section 302 and undergoing sentence for life imprisonment in the District Jail, Rohtak, has filed the instant application for quashing order dated 03.01.2011 (Annexure-P-1) passed by the Superintendent, District Jail, Rohtak, vide which the prayer of the applicant for grant of parole has been declined on the ground that he has not completed one year of sentence after conviction. Even on second call, no one is present on behalf of the petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that his presence is very much required as he is going to get marry. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and going through the contents of the application, we do not find any merit in this application. Admittedly, the petitioner has been convicted and sentenced in the aforesaid case by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jajjhar, on 29.09.2010. Till date the petitioner has not completed one year of his imprisonment after conviction and has not earned his first annual good conduct remission, as provided under Rule 4(1) of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Rules, 2007. Therefore, we are not inclined to grant the concession of parole to the petitioner, at this stage. Dismissed in limine. (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (M. JEYAPAUL) JUDGE February 11, 2011. sjks.