'l? IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH^BILASPUg Writ Petition (Q No. 2246 of2007 Petitioners 1. Siiit. Jotkunwar, W/o Garadhar Verma, aged about 55 years, resident of Vill^e Kumhi, Tehsil - Beria, District Dui^ (C.G.) 2. Santurain, S/o Sakharam, aged about 32 years, resident of Village Lara, TehsU Berla, District Dui^ (C.G.) 3. Jivdhaa Yadav, S/o Shambhu Yadav, aged about 47 years, resident of village Lara, Tehsil Berla, District Durg (C.G.) 4. Bhushan Venna, S/o Shatrughau, aged about 35 years, resident of viUage Malpuri, Tehsil Dhamdha, District Diu^ (C.G.) 5. Parwati Vemia, W/o Late Kedar Venna, aged about 40 years, resident of vfflage Malpuri, Tehsil Dhamdha, Distnct Diu^ (C.Q.) 6. Laxmau. Nishad, S/o Chaitu, aged about 55 years, resident of viUage Malpuri, Tehsil Dhamdha, District Dm^ (C.G.) 7. Sliatrughan Verma, S/o Raniha, aged about 60 years, resident of village Malpuri, Tehsil Dhanidha, District Duig (C.G.) 8. Ram VUas Yadu, S/o Punaram Yadu, agd about 50 years, resident of vfflage Bhmbhouri, Tehsfl Berla, District Dwg (C.G.) Respondents Versus 1. 2. 3. 4. State of Chhattisgarh, fhrough Depuly Secretaiy, Energy Departaient, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District CoUector, Durg (C.G.) Tehsildar, Tehsil Of&ce Berla, Dist. Durg. Ziudal Power Limited, Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION QFJNDIA, (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AgmhotnJ.) Shri B. K. Chakiaborty, Advocate for fhe petitioiiers. Shri Vivek Sharma, Advocate for fhe respondents No. 1 to 3. O RD B R (Oralt (Passed on this 15fh day ofjuly, 2009) Heard. 1. The petitiouers, by this petition, seelc for grant of relief to the effect that "order passed by state govermnent (Annexure P/l) and joint cottector may kindfy be quashed and petitioner land may not be aoquired without paying adequate cornpensation." ^ 6. The petition lacks inaterial facts aad it is not clear asto whefher any electric tower or electric Urte is iastatled on fhe laad of fhe petitioners. In para 5.2 of the petition it is mentioned " tha.t s(afe govemment has acquired M/s Zindal Power limited for installing double drcu.it electric line of 100 K.W. lenth - 254 Km. in which will go throiigh the lands of former of Berla and Dhamdha. Petitoner land is affected by above order" The petitioners have further not made out a case whether fheir lands bave been used by the conceraed party after or wifhout taldng over possession of the land. It is not pleaded ia fhe writ petition whefher auy proceediag has been iaitiated. No detaUs have been stated ia fhe writ petition. Leamed couasel appeariiig for fhe respondents/State submjts fhat the petition deserves to be dismissed for waut of material facts aud proper prayer. Hon'ble Supreme Court m R. Senthil Babu Vs. State ofTamil Nadu aad another1, observed as under: °4. In fhe present case we find fhat the initial burden on the appeUants itself has not been dischai^ed in fhe sense fhat the petttions filed before ttie High Court were very sketchy. A chaUenge of fhis nature requires the appellants to ftu-nish greater details before the State could be caUed upon to submit quaatifiable and nieasurable data justi^iiag the mipugned rate. Ultunately, it is the State whicli bas to nieet the allegations made ia the writ petitions aud if those allegations made ia fhe writ petitions are vague, inaccurate or iasufficient fhen it would not be possible for the State to subniit ite reply/data to the Court." In view of fhe foregoing, the petition is dismissed beiag vague, lacking acciu-ate aad sufScient detajls. No order asto costs. Thalsur Sd7- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 (2009) 2 SCC 309