1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL (L) NO.793 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1808 OF 2009 Yogesh Ramdev Shenoy .... Appellant V/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.P.C.Kansara, for the appellant. Mr.S.Ingawale, A.G.P., for the respondents. CORAM :P.B.MAJMUDAR, & R.V.MORE, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 17, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned A.G.P., for the respondent – State. 2. In our view, no interference is called for in the impugned judgment of the learned Single Judge. It is not in dispute that various raids were organized at the appellant’s restaurant and it was found that some waitresses recruited by the appellant were found to be indulging in indecent behaviour towards customers. Even various complaints have been lodged against the restaurants in this connection. The original file was shown to us by the learned A.G.P. It was also shown to the learned counsel for the appellant. He submitted that some complaints are false 2 and it is filed only towards personal grievance. So far as this aspect is concerned, in a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, this Court cannot examine such a disputed question. By the impugned decision, the State Government has suspended licence of the appellant for two months and the learned Single Judge has dismissed the petition filed by the appellant, against which this appeal is filed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering various complaints lodged against the appellant in connection with the indecent behaviour, this is not a case in which we would like to interfere with the decision of the learned Single Judge. It is also alleged that the prostitution activities are also going on in the restaurant of the appellant, though this aspect is not stated in the show cause notice. 3. Considering the relevant aspect of the matter and the reasoning of the learned Single Judge, it cannot be said that the action of the State Government is illegal or arbitrary in any manner. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ( R.V.MORE, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)