THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1129 of 2004 ORDER The petitioner filed a complaint against respondent No.1 herein. After investigation, the police concerned filed a charge sheet against the accused and the same was taken on file as S.T.C.No.462 of 2003 on the file of the XIII Special Metropolitam Mgistrate, Secunderabad. During the course of trial, P.W.1 was examined and Ex.P1 was marked on behalf of the complainant. No evidence was adduced and no document was marked on behalf of the accused. The learned Magistrate having considered the said oral and documentary evidence came to the conclusion that the prosecution has miserably failed to prove the case against the accused and accordingly, acquitted them of the said charges. 2. The State, which filed the said Case before the Court below, has not chosen to challenge the order of acquittal of the accused passed by the Court below and hence, the de facto complainant, who was examined as P.W-1, filed this Revision invoking the jurisdiction of the Court under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. 3. It should be remembered that it is a Revision against the order of acquittal of the accused, where the scope of Revision is very much restricted. Even if this Court ultimately holds that respondent No.1 herein is guilty of the offences with which he was charged, this Court can only remand the matter to the Court below for fresh disposal of the matter, but cannot convert the said finding of acquittal into conviction. Further, though the Revision was admitted as early as on 23.09.2004, notice is not served on the unofficial respondent. As this is a Revision against the acquittal of the accused and the notice is not served on respondent No.1, this Court finds no merits in this Revision and accordingly, the revision is dismissed. ____________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J Date:03.02.2011 sj