IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY TUESDAY, THE NINETH DAY OF FEBRUARY, TWO THOUSAND TEN WRIT PETITION No.5809 of 2003 Between: Kum. Uppala Vijaya Swathi. … Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue (Endowments-II) Department, Reptd., by its Secretary to Government, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri M.V.Venu for Sri Kowturu Vinay Kumar. Counsel for the respondents: --- This Court made the following: ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ or direction preferably a writ of Mandamus declaring Memo No.66783/Endowments-II (2)/2001-2, dt.18-3- 2003 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 1st respondent to adjudicate and dispose of the revision filed against the order of the 2nd respondent dt.31-8-2001 by providing opportunity of being heard to the petitioner”. At the hearing, Sri M.V.Venu, counsel representing Sri Kowturu Vinaya Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that in view of the events taken place subsequent to the filing of the Writ Petition, no further orders are necessary in the Writ Petition. In view of this submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.7627 of 2003 is also dismissed as infructuous. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:09-2-2010 MNR