IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16932 of 2011 Mukesh Kumar Choudhary S/o Sri Akhileshwar Choudhary Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03 04.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the First Information Report but it appears from impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge that in course of investigation the statement of two co-accused persons namely Manik Tanti and Rajnish Singh was recorded and incorporated by I.O. at paragraph no. 134 and 151 respectively and the aforesaid co- accused persons named the petitioner as one of the participants in the alleged crime. It would appear from the aforesaid facts as well as submissions of the parties that apart from the aforesaid confessional statements, there is nothing against the petitioner. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances of this case as well as the submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released 2 on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 106 of 2010. Safik (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)