IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2630 of 2004 DHARMENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5 23.07.2008 Heard counsel for the parties. Reference may be made to the order of this Court dated 8.4.2008. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the first part of the order was complied on 15.5.2008 when the joining of the petitioner was accepted with effect from 20.7.2004. He also submits that when the second part of the order has been sought to be complied, though not fully complied inasmuch as order for sanctioning payment of salary for the period 20.7.2004 onwards has been passed but its actually payment has not been tendered to him. Mr. Pathak, counsel appearing on behalf the State, however, submits that the bonafide of the Government and opposite parties is absolutely clear that certain payment including current salary to the tune of Rs. 1,51309/- has already been made to the petitioner on 13.6.2008 and, therefore, it cannot be said that the opposite parties have any intention to - 2 - flout the order of this Court. Considering the aforementioned aspect, this Court is satisfied that no contempt has been committed by the opposite parties. This contempt application is therefore, disposed of by directing the opposite parties to ensure that even the balance payment to which the petitioner is entitled must be made within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With the aforementioned observations and directions this application is disposed of. BCJ (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)