1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 3. CRA/72/2006 (Maharashtra State Board of Wakfs and another vs. M/s Kothari Builders and another) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.S.Kazi, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. Amol Gandhi, Adv., h/f Mr. Mr. U.B.Bilolikar, Adv., for respondent no.1. Mr. S.S.Bora, Adv., h/f Mr. S.C.Bora, Adv., for respondent no.2. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:19/1/2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr. Kazi, Counsel for the Wakf Board. 2. The order rejecting application in terms of Section 9- A of C.P.C. is subject of challenge. 3. Basically, the suit preferred by the plaintiff before the Civil Court being RCS No.70/2006 was against the Municipal Council in 2 relation to his controversies for permission. It was the Wakf Board, got impleaded in the said suit and, thereafter, moved application below Exh.30 for deciding jurisdiction. 4. Record display, there is already a suit being Suit No. 32/2004 by the same plaintiff, seeking to challenge notice in terms of Section 54 of the Wakf Act. Taking survey of above aspects, it is more than clear, that RCS No.70/2006 pending in the Civil Court was basically with a cause against the Municipal Council, it is not directly involving the right, jurisdiction of the Wakf Board as that care is taken in other suit in RCS No. 32/2004. No error in the order of learned Judge. No illegality. Civil Revision Application lacks merit. Dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/72-06cra