IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.20372 of 2011 Date of Decision.03.11.2011 Arya Girls High School and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab through its Secretary to Government of Punjab and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Vikram Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Without going into the merits of the case, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he will be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-19) given to the Director Public Instruction, Punjab is considered and appropriate decision is taken on the representation. As ordered, the authority shall take appropriate decision on the representation. 2. The petitioner has further grievance that a false complaint has been made and a case has been registered against the 2nd petitioner. The 2nd petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate or in any other jurisdiction for quash of the FIR if the case is made out. The writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not appropriate remedy for the relief sought for by the petitioner. 3. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 03, 2011 Pankaj*