BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Eighth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15495 of 2011 1 KODEESWARI 2 MOKKATHAI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 Vs STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL DISTRICT CR.NO. 51/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.ALAGUMANI Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 120-B, 467, 420 of IPC. They have approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Heard Mr.Alagumani, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they did not commit any crime as stated in the complaint. He would submit that due to civil dispute, they have been falsely implicated in this case. He would also submit that they are also having permanent residence and therefore, he would request for the grant of anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the investigation is still pending and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners, suitable conditions may be passed for the secured presence of the petitioners. 5. Considering the submissions made on either side, this Court is of the view that the petitioners are women and the settlement deed executed by the parties are true or not, which facts are gone into by the Civil Court at the time of trial, since the matter related to civil dispute in between the parties. In the said circumstances, I find prima facie for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners, of course, subject to certain stringent conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the Judicial Magistrate concerned on executing separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vedasndur, and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for the purpose of interrogation. 7. The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail grantd shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 28/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VEDASANDUR. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL. 3. INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. R.ALAGUMANI Advocate SR. No.41931 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15495 of 2011 Date :28/11/2011 RJ/30.11.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/