Civil Revision No. 6096 of 2006 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6096 of 2006 Date of decision: 04.09.2009 Jasbir Singh and another ....Petitioners versus Smt. Banto Devi and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present: - Mr. S.S. Dinarpur, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Chahal, Advocate, and Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Baldev Singh, Advocate, for respondents No. 3 to 5. *** VINOD K. SHARMA, J. The petitioners, by way of this revision petition, have challenged the impugned part of the order dated 7.10.2006, passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jagadhri, vide which the application moved under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, stands allowed, and the plaintiffs were directed to pay the ad valorem court fee on the value of the suit land, mentioned in the sale deed dated 9.1.2006. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners was, that plaintiffs could have been directed to pay the court fee even on the Civil Revision No. 6096 of 2006 -2- release deed and not merely the sale deed. The revision petition against an order vide which a party is not directed to pay the ad valorem court fee on the relief claimed, is not revisable, in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Full Bench of the Court in Niranjan Kaur Vs. Nirbigan Kaur, 1982 PLR 127. Revision dismissed as not competent. (Vinod K. Sharma) Judge September 04, 2009 R.S.