:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 428 OF 1990 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 428 OF 1990 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 428 OF 1990 IN IN IN SUIT NO. 2483 OF 1999 SUIT NO. 2483 OF 1999 SUIT NO. 2483 OF 1999 M/s. Gammon India Ltd .....Plffs. Plffs. Plffs. vs. The Khatau Makhanji Spinning and Weaving Co.Ltd and anr. .....Defnds. Defnds. Defnds. ------------ Meena Doshi for the plffs. Manisha Poladia i/b. Mansukhlal and Hiralal for the defnds. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 13th September, 2005. P.C. :. 1. Learned counsel for the plaintiff states that seeks leave to withdraw the Summons for Judgment with liberty to take out a fresh Summons for Judgment after the company comes out of the AIFR. :2: 2. Summons for Judgment is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 3. The plaintiffs are directed to inform the defendants advocate as well as the Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court about the status of the proceedings before the AIFR every six months and if any final order is passed then such order to be communicated within 15 days from the passing of the said order. 4. It is clarified that the plaintiff will also be at liberty to apply for AIFR for necessary directions. With the aforesaid clarification Summons for Judgmetn dismissed as not pressed. sd/- ***************