IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3425 of 2010 1. RAJ KUMAR YADAV S/O LATE BINDESHWARI PRASAD YADAV R/O VILL.- HATHWAN, P.S.- ALAULI, DISTT.- KHAGARIA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER ALAULI, DISTT.- KHAGARIA 3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TUBEWELL DIVISION KHAGARIA 4. SUB. DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TUBEWELL SUB-DIVISION KHAGARIA ----------- 02. 20.05.2011 After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner moulds his prayer confining it to the only submission that he has instructions to state that the Tube well installed is not functional and is to the benefit of none. It is acknowledged that there is no such pleading on record at this stage. There is no occasion for the Court to make any observation with regard to the fact whether the Tube well is functioning or not. If the petitioner represents that the Tube well was a dead instrument and the Government has no intention to resurrect it, his request for removal may be considered at the discretion of the Government. The application is dismissed with the aforesaid observation. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)