IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11938 of 2010 HULLAR PASWAN . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 7.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The allegations are of making ransom calls. He is in custody since 7.2.2003. It is acknowledged that he has antecedent of about 8 to 10 cases under serious Sections of the Penal code. Considering the period of custody, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 75,000/- (seventy five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Asstt. Sessions Judge, Ist Danapur in connection with S.Tr. No. 335/04 arising out of Khagaul P.S. Case No. 56/02. Both the sureties must be his mother and father respectively whose photographs and proof of residence shall be appended to the bail bonds. The Court below through the local police shall have the bail bonds verified and only thereafter shall proceed to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to be physically present on each and every date on trail, a single 2 absence may entail cancellation of his bail by the Court below. If the petitioner is involved in any criminal prosecution during the pendency of the present case, it shall be construed as a misuse of privilege of bail when the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bonds by the Court below itself. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)