IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3371 of 2002 Ram Gulam Mahto, son of Late Shiv Nandan Mahto, resident of village- Dharmuhan, P.S. & Anchal Kurhani, P.O. Turki, District- Muzaffarpur. ..... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 3. District Magistrate –cum- Collector, at Muzaffarpur. 4. Dy. Collector, Land Reforms, West Muzaffarpur. 5. Sub-Divisional Officer, West Muzaffarpur. 6. Ramgati Baitha, son of Late Parsan Baitha. 7. Thukku Baitha, son of Late Parsan Baitha. Both residents of village- Dharmuhan, P.S. and Anchal Kurhani, District- Muzaffarpur. ..... Respondents. ----------- 05- 23.12.2008 Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad for the petitioner, and Mr. Anwar Karim, learned junior counsel Standing Counsel No.5 for respondent nos.1 to 5 are present. None appears on behalf of respondent nos.6 and 7 although they filed file the counter affidavit. 2. It relates to Plot no.787, appertaining to R.S. Khata No.253, covering an area of six decimals, situate in village- Dharmuhan, P.S. and Anchal- Kurhani (now Turki), district- Muzaffarpur. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 1.3.2001 (Annexure-3), passed by the learned Collector 2 of the district of Muzaffarpur in Case No.73 (Misc.) of 1997-98 (Ram Gulam Mahto and others Vs. Samgat Baitha and others), whereby the petitioner’s application for correction of the survey entries with respect to the land in question has been rejected, as a result of which the same has been recorded in the names of respondent nos.6 and 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to point out any infirmity in the impugned order. In that view of the matter, and also for the reasons assigned in the impugned order, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. 3. The writ petition is dismissed. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/