1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2830 OF 2009 (Bhaiyalal Suklal Muzalda ...VERSUS.. State of Maharashtra and others) =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==- Mr. N.C.Phadnis, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. A.S.Fulzele, A.G.P. For respondent nos.1 and 3 Mr. A.L.Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent no.4 C ORAM : D.B.BHOSALE ; PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATED : 22nd June, 2010. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the questions involved in the present writ petition are squarely covered by the judgment of Full Bench in the case of Shweta Shantalal Lal .Vs. State of Maharashtra and others, reported in 2010 (2) Mh.L.J. 904 and in view thereof, he does not press this writ petition and submits that the petitioner would like to challenge the Full Bench judgment in the Supreme Court. The petition is disposed of as not pressed in view of the judgment of the Full Bench. 3. The interim protection granted earlier shall remain operative for a period of six weeks from today to enable the petitioner to approach the Supreme Court, against the judgment of the Full Bench, if he so desires. JUDGE JUDGE