IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6549 of 2011 ASHOK SINGH . Versus THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION . ----------- 2. 19.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State Election Commission. The grievances of the petitioner are two fold. (a) errors in the voter list by wrong addition of names and deletion of others (b) the location of the booth near the house of the Mukhiya contrary to the instructions of the Commission. In so far as ground (a) is concerned it stands fully covered by a Division Bench judgment reported in 2001 (3) PLJR 667, as outside purview of the writ Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In so far as ground (b) is concerned, counsel for the Commission submits under Rule 27 of the Panchayat Election Rules the Commission has powers to issue appropriate instructions. Instructions have already been issued not to locate booth near the residence of the Mukhiya. On the own showing of the petitioner, the Commission is already in seisin of the matter. There is no occasion for the Court in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the 2 Constitution for a direction or shifting of the booth. The writ application stands disposed in the aforesaid terms. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)