IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.1432 OF 2008 APPLICATION No.1432 OF 2008 APPLICATION No.1432 OF 2008 (For Bail) Kamran Akhtar ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Mr G. H. Keluskar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr S. R. Shinde, Advocate for the State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C. DAGA,J. V.C. DAGA,J. V.C. DAGA,J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 05.05.2008. 05.05.2008. 05.05.2008. P.C. C. C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. Perused the application and the material available on record. 3. By this application, the applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.351 / 2007 registered with Shantinagar Police Station, Bhiwandi, District Thane for the offence punishable under Sections 399, 402 of the I.P.C. 4. According to the learned counsel for the applicant, the investigation is over and charge sheet has already been filed. The learned A.P.P. has strongly opposed the application on the ground that the present applicant while on bail in C.R. No. 253 of 2006 registered with Shantinagar police station for ( 2 ) the offence under Section 302 of I.P.C. committed the present crime. In that view of the matter the learned Sessions Judge, Thane was pleased to reject application for bail for the reasons which can be seen from the under mentioned observations:- "Learned A.P.P. submitted that the present applicant is accused in an offence punishable under Section 302 of I.P.C.registered by Shantinagar Police Station vide Crime No. 253 of 2006. While on bail in that crime, he has committed instant crime. It indicates that the applicant is misusing the liberty of bail and is not deserving discretion of bail." 5. Having seen the order of the learned Sessions Judge, I do not see any reason to take contrary view. It is, thus, clear that the applicant has mis-used bail granted by the Court. Possibility of the applicant of committing further offence cannot be ruled out. 6. In the result, the present application stands rejected. 7. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the trial of the present applicant be treated as "expedited". ( 3 ) 8. Any observation made in this order shall not be construed as any finding or any expression of opinion on the merits of the case at the time of trial. (V.C.AGA,J) (V.C.AGA,J) (V.C.AGA,J)