C.W.P No. 5458 of 1990 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No. 5458 of 1990 Date of decision : April 23, 2009 Devi Dayal Sharma, ...... Petitioner (s) v. The State of Haryana and another, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. R.K.Malik, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vikas Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.K.Gupta, Addl.A.G Haryana for the respondents. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J The petitioner has challenged the order dated 21.2.1990 (Annexure P-9) whereby he was given three months' notice informing him that he would not be retained in service beyond the age of 55 years. The only contention raised is that during his entire service career, the petitioner was conveyed adverse remarks only for the years 1983-84 and 1985-86 and that representations against these two adverse reports were pending at the time when the impugned order was served upon him. C.W.P No. 5458 of 1990 ::2:: The respondents have annexed along with the written statement a gist of character roll entries of the petitioner from 1979-80 to 1988-89. As per this gist, for the year 1981-82, an adverse entry of `doubt integrity' was communicated to the petitioner by letter dated 27.7.1982 apart from the two entries for the years 1983-84 and 1985-86. In Baikuntha Nath Das v. Chief District Medical Officer, Baripada 1992 AIR (SC) 1020, the Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down that even un-communicated adverse remarks could form the basis of an order of pre-mature retirement. It is admitted that no representation was made against the adverse remarks for the year 1981-82. In Baikuntha Nath Das's case (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court also laid down that even one entry of integrity doubtful could be enough to justify an order of pre-mature retirement. Apart from this, it has been brought to my notice that even with regard to the remarks for the years 1983-84 and 1985-86, the representations of the petitioner were rejected. Thus, no ground has been made out for setting aside the impugned order. Consequently, this writ petition is dismissed with, however, no order as to costs. ( AJAY TEWARI ) April 23, 2009. JUDGE `kk'