J‘L ‘ / Ow?“ No6 $77: I “Emlcmm s .1 c"; w 0; "_..lagaje MOkhli wmgm (mm) 2§cxx§>§akt§§$x§xaga&x&mx$;iam§§x&1<x&mxaxw mx§éi3z3mg§wgx$<® wxmxxwwymwwxgwx .,h r Secetéxry, Dapartréent of Revenue: Govt. 0f a rzya PraééSh, BHGPALa COmmi s 5i on e I: Baard of Yuan-C1. Revenue, Ma&1ya Eradegh, Gwalior“ $ettlemen t Gff icez: DURG , DETAEW WWW...“ OF THE APPLICATEQV gigglarswf the arder is; {agtggwr .uALV‘ C M :“ agcx - SB° Hon’ble Shri Maninéra Mohan Smivastava J. £3203.2010 When that matter was c The petitioner and the matter ‘ V murm, none appears for the pt :titioner. Shri Chandmsh Shri State] respondents. The petition is therefore Siuhe alled for hearing, none appeaxed for was passed over. Even in the Second vastavay Panel Lawyer for the dismissed 'for want of prosecution. n Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastavé"; Judge i rm fr