IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26571 of 2009 MENIGAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4 19.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, opposite party no.2 and the State. This is an application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the opposite party no.2. It clearly appears to make some pressure on behalf of complainant otherwise also allegation in itself goes to show that sometimes victim and accused persons were in compromising terms and sometimes making allegations only. Paragraph-6 of the complaint petition can be referred that while the victim was at Delhi along with Sultan, mother of the victim and father of accused persons reached there where an assurance was given by father of accused persons to marry but the victim remained insisting to accompany accused Sultan. So, I find it not a fit case in which anticipatory bail granted to opposite party no.2 can be cancelled. Application for cancellation of bail is dismissed. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)