Bl? t.-T^ Petitioner Respondents IJiGH COUffT OP CHHATnKS<URH: BltASPUJi Writ PeUtion Ne. M1S pif 2004 Shri SauraU) SahUi aged 31 years, son of ShriK-R. Sahu, Cei.iy Wages Gracluate Engineer, in the ofRce of the Executjve Engineer, DutgDivisionNe.1, restdaitof Kirti Kunj,Kasardih, Durg(CG). Versus 1} The Secretary, Qovemmerrt of Chhattisgarh, Publio Worte Department, D.K.8. Bhawan, Raipur (CG$. 2) The ChiefEngineer (East), Chhattisgarh PablicWorte Department, Raipur. 3) The Superintending Ergineer, G.G. Publte Works Department, Dufg, Circle, Durg. 4) The Exeeutive Engineer, e.Q. PublicWorks .Department, Durg Division No.1 Duig. (Writ Petltton Articte under Article 2%ff27 oftheConditutton of India) SB: Hon'bte Mr. SaUsh K. Agnlheb-i, J. Presenfc Shri H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advooate with Shrt Pank^j Agrwal oounsel for - thepetitioner. . Shri Alok Bakhi, Gcnrt. Advocate forthe respondsntsState. Raju ORAL OROER (Passed on l" February, 2808) Learned counsel appearing for the petltioner sutxnits ttiat since the»are two vacant posts avallabte, the petitiorier interris to make a representaticn to the authorities to consider his case. In vlew of that, the petltioner seetes permi^ion ofthis Court towithdraw this petition with the above stated liberty, to whteh learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no dqectlon. 2$ It is ordered as prayed for. 3) The petitton is dismisssl as withdrawn with the abewe stated llberty; '--.. \.,:—'~\ ' Sd/- • \ \ , ' Satish^.Agnihotri i Judge ; iiB >