IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34252 of 2010 RAMBALI MAHTO & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 09.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioners, namely, Rambali Mahto and Vijay Prasad Mahto apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1614 of 2009 for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 418 and 323 of the I.P.C. Allegedly, petitioners took Rs. two lacs from complainant when petitioner no. 1 was fallen ill on this pretext that either they would return the money to the complainant or execute the sale deed in respect of their lands but subsequently neither they returned the money nor executed the sale deed. Even if the prosecution story assumes to be true, then also, it appears to be a case of civil dispute. Accordingly, it is ordered that petitioners, namely, Rambali Mahto and Vijay Prasad Mahto, in the event of their arrest/surrender within thirty days from the date of communication of this order, shall be released on bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 1614 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of Sri A. Shamim, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Katihar subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)