HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Writ Petition No.3700 of 2005 Petitioners Board of Education, Church of North India, Jabalpur Diocese, Jabalpur and others versus St. Paul’s Church Shikshan, Prashikshan Evam Sewa . Samiti, Raipur Present: Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Sunii Otwani, counsel for the respondent. Respondent L, Writ Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of lndia challenging the » L order dated 28-7—2005 passed by the 3rd Additional District Judge, Raipur allowing the respondent/plaintiff’s appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which, in turn, was l \ preferred by the rfffpondent/plaintiff challenging the order passed by the trial Court on 9—3—2005 rejecting prayer of the plaintiff for grant of temporary injunction. As a result of the appellate order, the plaintiff was granted temporary injunction and the petitioners/defendants »wer‘e restrained from interfering with the functioning of the plaintiff/institution. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 14th February? 201 ,1) Learned counsel appearing for the parties are heard finally. 2. The defendants in the suit have preferred this writ petition (my 2 3. This writ petition came-up for hearing on admission and stay on 12-8-2005 and on the said date the parties were directed to maintain status quo till the next date of hearing. 4. This Court wanted to ascertain the present status of the suit in View of the fact that further proceedings in the suit were not stayed by this Court, however, learned counsel for the parties would submit at the Bar that because of the pendency of this writ petition, no .7 _ material progress has taken place in the suit. 5. The dispute pertains to the functioning of an educational institution, therefore, this Court is of the view that it will be in the interest of all concerned that the dispute be resolved/adjudicated as early as possible. 6. In view of the nature of dispute involved, it is directed that the trial Court shall do well to dispose of the suit as early as possible preferably within a period of four months from the date of presentation of certificate copy of this order. lt is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits ofthe case. 7. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mistua l Judge Gopal