IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22327 of 2009 Manoj Kumar Agarwal, son of Late Jitan Agrawal, resident of village, P.O. and P.S. Chenari, Distt. Rohtas. ----- Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Uma Shankar Prasad Agrawa, son of Late Jitan Agrawal, resident of village, P.O. and P.S. Chenari, Distt. Rohtas. ------ Opposite Parties. ----------- 2. 01.07.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 27.2.2009 passed by the Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram, in Criminal Revision No. 41 of 2009 by which it has allowed the prosecution in G.R. No. 24 of 2002, trial No. 647 of 2008 to examine some witnesses who had been refused by the Trial Court. Since the Revisional Court was of the view that the examination of the witnesses was essential and it allowed the examination of the three witnesses within a time limit being conscious of the delay in trial, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. The Trial Court is directed to immediately examine the three witnesses as directed and within the time limit fixed by the Revisional Court. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)