IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-37060 of 2010 Date of Decision: January 21, 2011 Jaswinder Kaur and another. …Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. R.K. Trikha, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, Addl. A.G., Punjab, for the respondent-State. Mr. Gurvinder Singh, Advocate, for the complainant. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case F.I.R. No. 135 dated 20.11.2010, under Sections 354, 506, 120-B IPC and Sections 67/67A of Information Technology Act, 2000, registered at Police Station City SBS Nagar. CRM M-37060 of 2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners have been enlarged on bail pursuant to the direction issued by this Court dated 22.12.2010 and they have joined investigation. Learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, on instructions from ASI Joginder Singh, who is present in person in Court, states that the petitioners have joined investigation. Learned counsel for the complainant has vehemently opposed the bail granted to the petitioners. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. Order dated 22.12.2010 is made absolute, subject to the limitations provided under Section 438(2) of the Code. Petitioners- accused shall participate in the investigation as and when they are required. January 21, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2