WP(C) 639/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE K. MERUNO Heard Mr.A.K. Bora, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and al so Mr. S.K. Das, learned Standing Counsel for the Education Department. The lear ned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is square ly covered by a judgment and order passed in W.P.' No.6756 of 2010, which was di sposed of on 21.12.2010. He, therefore, prays that this writ petition may be dis posed of in terms of the said judgment and order dated 21.12.2010. Mr. S.K. Das, learned Standing Counsel for the Education Department submits that since the Co urt has already passed an order in a similar matter, this Court may pass any ord er. On perusal of the judgment and order dated 21.12.2010 and also the pleadings of the writ petition, the present writ petition being identical and the issues raised in this writ petition is the same as read in W.P.' No.6756 of 2010, this writ petition is disposed of in the light of the said judgment and order dated 2 1.12.2010. The present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitio ner to approach the competent authority praying for relaxation of the qualificat ion and in case such an application is filed, the same shall definitely be consi dered and disposed of by the authority in accordance with law and as expeditiou sly as possible by a speaking and reasoned order so that if the relaxation is g iven in exercise of the powers conferred under Rule 30 of the 2003 Rules, the pe titioner is not deprived from participating in the selection process. The writ p etition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs . JUDGE Samir/.