1 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 934 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 343 OF 2004 Vahidali Abdulgani Chuhe .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. Aniket Vagal for applicant. Mr. V.B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. August 31, 2009. P.C. Heard Mr. Vagal the learned counsel for the applicant. The applicant prays for being released on temporary bail for a period of 30 days. He had made similar prayer in Criminal Application No. 513 of 2009 and the said application was disposed off by this court on 30/6/2009 by granting liberty to the applicant to apply for parole/furlough and on submission of such an application, the Competent Authority was required to decide the same within four weeks from 30/6/2009. There is no averment in this application as to when the applicant submitted an application for parole/furlough after the order dated 30/6/2009 was passed by this court 2 in Criminal Application No. 513 of 2009 and the said order very clearly grants liberty to the applicant to submit such an application for parole/furlough to the Competent Authority. This application is repetition of very same prayer that was made in Criminal Application No. 513 of 2009 and in view of the order passed on 30/6/2009, this application cannot be entertained. Hence, the application is rejected. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)