7~^i ^ ('O'O) Jndrea 'ropsBa 'jao®0uor»Bonpg 3poig aqj. ('O'O) Jndre-a 'jaoggO UOHeotipg l3u»siQ aty, qj^spi^Bqqo jndiea 'IBJ3U30 ^uetunoaov aty. -(qj^Stueiiqo) Jndreg '^BUBiajoas qj^spnBqqo 'uBMBqg ^uiS ireAie^ rveQ ' i.usiiq-redaa uor|.B3npg looqog 'AiBianas aip— r^nojtp q.[^si»Bqqojoaajs^s / snsaaA (zcss9Z*a-a •o|i -3/v •d'd'3) -O'O Jndrea ^UISIQ 'iopsea -qej, 'iopsex aSeniA o/g 'sjeaA t^ ^noqe pa8e 'vSu.evpBQ UBBJUJSIQ o/s Te£uBCfBQ vaaes n]8uepi ^£> r' .•^ .^ ^J^-^ ^' °f91.^^' syLNaoNOdsaa ^1 ^"..•'^' '< ,(;S.^;^ /••^'/~ <^s^ ^^ •aaNOLtuad •oiaNOLuamoad / Aavaouaao / snwvcuww do aanj.vN 3BU jsn SNOiioaaia / NOLLoama 'saaaao / aaaao '&LRIM / JJSA dO aONVflSSI a0d VIONI ^O NOULfUALSNOO giu3ozee/ges s^^^uav aacum NQULU3d JJHA 900S/ Z 9^7 'ON^NOULLLad JJSM *»• ('o'o) ynjsvTia J-V H8VOSUJLVHH3 dO J^anOO HOM ^^a^[OH 3HJ- 380^38 ^^•^^ y;''s!KS,^ys^Ssi^^^S!SSffy?'S"Sf?;s®:'5:?^?;?'F 5. The ninripal, GIITU Ghasi Das Govt. Hi^ier Secondaiy School, Kasdol, Raipur, C.G. XI-HC-78 tfT(Rtl a»tfT<sh 3:ScT^TpTRTIT, ®Tn+l'ie,[sldiuy -vi.f..h/}>.yL^"2:l^^200 an^TriRraT (^qfg^sr) sn^TqiTR.ficb tTOT 3IR?T gitTR) ^^ ^L ^ s^TTWHf^rsn^T 30.8.2006 Mr. Yogendra Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Vinay Pandey, P.L. for Mr. S.K. Beriwal, Adv. for Heard. Learned counsel for the petitior)' counsel for respondent No.2 during th^ The main grievance of the pet| demitting the office on 31 .3.2004, as p( he y/as entitled for GPF amount to tu,t paidonlyRs.1,69.731/-. ! have Derused the GPF Recort Block Development Cffioer, Kasdol, Dij till 28.6.2006 an amount of Rs.3,19,51 petitioner has been paid only Rs. 1,1 resDondent authorities. for the petitioner. resptsndent No.1 S> 3, to 5 on advance copy. resrtondent No.2 |er to supply extra oopy of petition to learned course of day. Itioner in this petition is that at the time of ^r GPF Reconciliation Sheet (Annexure P-1) of Rs.3,19,818/-, whereas, he has been tutie 6$ respifcndent representation regarding his grievanoe not deciding the same. Therefore, ofthe petitioner regarding fina! paymenf for the respondents have no objeotion. In the oireumstances, respondetit petitioner regarding final payment of period of 60 days from the date of paid all the amount inciuding interest Respondent No.3 to ensure th^t No.2, ifthe same are a!ready not suppl With the direction aforesaia. thel Certified copy as per rules. GlpF reo^ipt +l'i|td41-f 1l4<'i1'^'fec^<R|'Bil<. SR Sfrf^IT 3n^?T ciliation Sheet (Annexure P-1) in whioh the itrict Raipur has oategorical mentioned that 6/- was due to the petitioner, whereas, the 1.731/- for the reasons best known to the ounsel for the petitioner subntits that the petitioner had already made a 1o respondent No.2, but respondent No.2 is No.2 be directed to decide the case of GPF amount, to which learned oounsel No. 2 is directed to decide the oase of the amount in accordanoe with law within a ofcopy ofthis order. The petitioner be ut>to the date the payment is made. all the partioulars are sent to retepondent i^d, within a period of 30 days from today. Ipetition stands disposed of. Sd/. Y-