0? k WW E §§ER§§W IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.V«S)No. §§l0 /201o WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER l'r ¢ w 1") V. g /. PETITIONER Sanu Ekka, S/o Late Shri Lairantus Ekka, aged about x w....... 42 years, working as T.W.D. m a \" W‘V‘G . W“ Primary School, Mundadipa, Block —Farsabahar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS RJESPONDENTS : L'KState of Chhattisgarh Through :— The Secretary, TribalaWelfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2‘? Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, i Disttm Jashpur (C.G.) 3‘ Block Education Officer, Block — Farsabahar Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 4. Treasury Officer, Treasury K Account & Pension Jashpur, Distt.—Jashpur (C.G.) 47 Nata? WWW m 200 311%?! W (Wu) WWW wmm WW WWR §§aff<ma11é$ mwm SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER 08. 10.2019 l for the petitioner, Stata Shri Somkant Verma, c Shri Vivek Shanna, PL for Counsal for the pen’tioner ubmits that the petitionar is entitled to b€neiit of two advan (e increments on account of he having passed B.T.I. examina ion before his appointment at his own cost. It is submitted t the issue involved in the present peu‘tion is no ionger r fntegra anc‘l the same has been finally decided by the H e Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena Vs. Sta e of NLP. 85 01's. 2009 nmMPJR (sc; 59. It is further submitted that this Comt has also taken a similar View in its order dated 6.2 2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6257/2008. Counsel for the peti 'oner further submits that the order dated 29.4.20 10 pa sed in Writ Appeal No. 124/2009, wherein relying up n the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of a Saxena (supra) and the order passed by this Court in another Writ Appeal No. 87I2009, directions have been ssued for consideration. of the case for grant of two advanc increments as per circular dated 21.9.1974 issued by the tate of Madhya Pradesh, after veriiication of the facts plea ed in the petition. x l y‘ / W o c e a e o 1 _XI-HC--7 8 ”LO (O . W zoo mm (Wm WWW WWW Wmm WWIE‘WW $aifW3TI€¥I Counsel for The State. s1 pctitioner would also be considers In View of above, the peti1 direction to the respondent autho circular dated 21.9. 1974 issued Pradesh after veriftcation of the facts pleaded in the petition within a period ofeight Weeks fror Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker 1bmits that case of the i on the same lines. ion is disposed of with a rities to decide the claim of the petitioner for grant of two advance increments as per by the State of Madhya n today. Judge