IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 1087 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.3.2009 Sukhminder Singh @ Sukhwinder Singh and another ....Petitioners Versus Ved Parkash and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. RAJESH BINDAL J **** The challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the learned Court below in execution proceedings directing sale of property of petitioners in execution of a decree against Harnek Singh. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that during the pendency of suit the property had exchanged hands twice and the petitioners are buyers of the property from earlier buyer of property from Harnek Singh and without notice to them part of the property which was purchased by them is sought to be sold. However, he did not deny the fact that for the relief being claimed in the present petition no application or petition has been filed before the Executing Court raising any ground as are sought to be raised in the present petition to save the property purchased by the petitioners from auction. As the petitioners have not yet set up their claim before the learned Executing Court as is sought to be projected in the present petition, I do not find any reason to interfere in the present petition at this stage. The petitioners, if so advised may file application or put up their claim before the Executing Court first. With these observations, the revision petition is disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) 20.3.2009 JUDGE Reema