IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33719 of 2008 BHUSHAN YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 04.09.2008 Heard. The petitioner is in custody in a case under Sections 25 & 26 of the Arms Act. The petitioner was found sitting on a bench having smoking Ganja and upon search he was found carrying weapon with a cartridge in the back pocket of his pant. The contention is that the seizure memo indicates that the seizure was made at 10.10 a.m. but the FIR does not indicate that particular time of occurrence. The further contention is that the seizure memo has the police station case number at its top and the signature of the petitioner instead of being Bhushan Yadav is Bhushan Kumar. It could be noted that the time of occurrence may be the one mentioned with seizure memo. The police might have slipped in mentioning it in the FIR. As regards the putting of police station case number at the top of the seizure memo, it could be for many purposes, one being to indicate the seizure memo of a particular case. So far as the - 2 - contention regarding the signature of the petitioner is concerned, it was for the petitioner to write his name and not for the police to mention the same. The petition is meritless and it is dismissed. However, as soon as the petitioner completes one year of confinement from the date of his remand in the case, the C.J.M. or any Officer, who receives the case, shall release the petitioner on bail on execution of a bond to his own satisfaction. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J)