1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Appln. No. 1023 of 2010 (In S.A. St.No. 18622/10) Arjun s/o Kisan Sawle ...Versus... Keshao s/o Tukaram Sale & ors. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. Sharma h/f Mr. A. Parchure Advocate for the applicant. ... CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 14.06.2011. Heard. There is a delay of 6 years, six months and 59 days in filing the second appeal. Though served, none appears for the respondents. I have perused the impugned judgment and decree which only relates to a decree restraining the appellant from obstructing the respondents from taking water from the suit well. I have also heard learned counsel for the appellant and also gone through the contents of the application for condonation of delay. The application for condonation of delay is not supported by any documentary evidence, though it is claimed that the appellant could not file appeal because of ill- 2 health. There is hardly any explanation for the long period of delay. It is not possible at this stage to disturb the right which has been crystalied in favour of the respondents as a result of the decree passed by the trial Court, particularly when the reasons furnished in the application are not at all satisfactory nor there are not good and sufficient reasons to condone the delay. Hence, the application for condonation of delay is dismissed. Consequently, S.A. St.No. 18622/10 is also dismissed. Judge /TA/