15.10.2001, By virtuna of the interim order tha petitioner is continuing at tha original place of pasting. Be that as it may, with the passage of time this petition has become infractuous as period of tranSfer is not applicabie forever. At this point of timeg there is no question to examine the validity of the transfer order, However; the respondents are at liberty to pass appropriate order keeping in View the public interest and administrative exigency, without insisting on compliance ofthe impugned transfer order. 9 , It is well settled principle of law that transfer is an incident of service and it is for the employer to decide as to where a particular emcer/employee be posted, keeping in view public interest as well as administrative exigency, This Court has l limited jurisdiction to interfere in the transfer matter and this Coui't can interfere only in the ease of proved malafide, non— competenee of authority passing the transfer order and transfer order not being in conformity with the rules and regulations. In View ofthe above, this petition stands disposed of. No order as ‘i t0 COStS. Sci/— Sansh K.Agnihotri : i Judge 'H , ' l l V