IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 14TH MARCH 2011 / 23RD PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 15689 of 2010(I) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ M/S.KERALA TILES, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER C.J.MATHEW, AGED 55, S/O.CHIRAMEL JOSE, KALLUR, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT., HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUDUKKAD POLICE STATION, PUDUKKAD. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUDUKKAD POLICE STATION. 5. THE GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, COLLECTORATE, THRISSUR. 6. SATHYAN, S/O.VENDURUTHAN KORAN, PADINJATTUMURI, KALLUR, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 7. MINI, W/O.SATHYAN, VENDURUTHAN, PADINJATTUMURI, KALLUR, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. sts WP(C)NO.15689/2010 8. USHA, W/O.POROTTUKARA VELU MOHANAN, PADINJATTUMURI, KALLUR, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 9. THANKAMANI, W/O.POROTTUKARA VELU SUKUMARAN, PADINJATTUMURI, KALLUR, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 10. BALAN VALLIVAN, KALLASSERY, PADINJATTUMURI, KALLUR, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. * ADDL.R11 IMPLEADED * ADDL.R11: REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR. * SUO MOTO IMPLEADED AS ADDL 11TH RESPONDENT AS PER ORDER DATED 28/5/2010. R1 TO R5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS R6 TO R10 BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- WPC No.15689 of 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th March, 2011 JUDGMENT Basant, J. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays and accordingly this petition is dismissed as unnecessary now, without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer on the subject subsequent to the filing of this Writ Petition. R.BASANT JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE css/