IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION NO : 22503 of 2002 Between: Smt.P.Prithvi, W/o. N.S.Dilip, Regional Engineering College (now National Institute of Technology), Warangal. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 National Institute of Technology (Regional Engineering College), Warangal, Rep., by its Incharge Director. 2 National Institute of Technology (REC), Warangal Rep., by its Principal. 3 Mr.B.Laxmi, W/o. Ravi Kishore, ( National Instt.of Technology), Warangal. 4 Sri K.Ravi Kishore, (Regional Engg.College), Warangal. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to To issue a Writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 1st and 2nd respondents in not evaluating the petitioner's Answer Script, both mid and end of Structured Digital Systems Desigh(SDSD) Subject by an external Evaluator of different college and the action of the respondent No.3 and 4 in failing the petitiner in t h e subjucts of structured Digital Systems Design (SDSD) and awarding of minimum marks in Seminar paper with registration No.259816 as being arbitrary, illegal , unconstitutional and biased and issued a consequential direction, directing the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to declare the result of the petitioner of structured Digital Systems Design (SDSD) and Seminar Papers by evaluating the same with an external Evaluator of different college and pass such further or other orders as deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.GIRIDHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION NO : 22503 of 2002 ORAL ORDER: Learned standing counsel for respondent university submitted that the petitioner successfully completed the course and left the University and no cause of action survives. In the light of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ G.YETHIRAJULU,J DATE: 26.2.2008 TVK ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{JR} THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION NO : 22503 of 2002 DATE: 26.2.2008