IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12816 of 2009 Mantun Kumar Singh s/o late Bijendra Pd. Singh, r/o village – Tilakpur, P.S. and Block – Alamnagar, Panchayat – Singhar, District – Madhepura ……… Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Bihar, Patna 2. The District Magistrate – cum-District Programme Coordinator, District – Madhepura 3. The Block Development-cum-Public Information Officer, Block Alamnagar, Madhepura 4. The Programme Officer, Block Alamnagar, Madhepura 5. Mukhiya, Panchayat Singhar, Block – Alamnagar, Madhepura 6. Chairman, Zila Parishad, Madhepura 7. Pramukh, Block Alamnagar, Madhepura 8. Panchayat Rozgar Sevak, Panchayata Singhar, Block Alamnagar, Madhepura ……….. Respondents ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Lal, Advocate For the State: Government Pleader – X For the respondent no.6: Mrs. Binita Singh, Advocate 2 05/10/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the respondent no.6. The petitioner, who claims to a public spirited person and owner of a medicine shop, resides within Singhar Panchayat of village Tilakpur, Police Station and Block – Alamnagar, District – Madhepura. A large number of documents have been annexed with the writ petition in order to support the allegation that the 2 concerned authorities in connivance with the elected representatives of the concerned Panchayat have indulged in corruption and bungling in implementation of Schemes such as INDIRA AWAS YOJNA, SAMPURN GRAMIN ROZGAR YOJNA, NAREGA etc. In the facts of the case, we dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to first approach the District Magistrate-cum- District Programme Coordinator, Madhepura (respondent no.2) along with all details and particulars of alleged bungling. If such representation along with relevant papers is filed then the respondent no.2 District Magistrate, Madhepura shall get the allegations verified or inquired by an appropriate authority or officer and take a decision on the representation in accordance with law at an early date preferably within three months of filing of the representation. Neyaz/ (Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ.) (S.K. Sharma, J.) 3