IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7278 of 2011 Hridaya Ram & Anr Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3 27-07-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. Petitioners are in jail custody since 05.05.2010 in a case registered under sections-302, 324/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is specific case of the prosecution that petitioners gave several dagger blows to the deceased causing injury to him on different parts of body including right phalanx , left phalanx, right thumb, left elbow etc. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the informant is not an eye witness of the alleged occurrence and as a matter of fact, the deceased was killed by some other persons at some other place and subsequently, his dead body was thrown near the place of occurrence. It is pointed out by him that in postmortem examination, altogether 11 injuries were found on the person of the deceased and the doctor has found injuries on head as well as other parts of the body and the aforesaid fact clearly corroborates this fact that the informant is not an eye witness of the alleged occurrence. Although learned counsel for the petitioners tried to convince me about the innocence of the petitioners but I am not at all convinced with his submissions and in my view, any 2 contradiction in first information report as well as postmortem report would be seen at the time of trial. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioners stands rejected. However, learned trial court is directed to conclude the trail of the petitioners within one year from the date of receipt of the order. Let the order be communicated to the court of Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No.-II ), Gopalganj in connection with Manjhagarha P.S. Case No. 36 of 2010 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 339 of 2010. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)