IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2011 / 11TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 14727 of 2011(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ALICE M.F., W/O.JOHN, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (MATHS), GOVERNMENT VOCATIONAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THRISSUR-14. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN SMT.GEETHA P.MENON SRI.N.AJITH SRI.P.B.SUBRAMANYAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THRISSUR. 3. SUMA N.V., HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (MATHS), VILLADOM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THRISSUR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.14727/2011-M ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 1st day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner herein seeks for a direction to the first respondent to consider Ext.P4 representation, which was filed aggrieved by the transfer of the third respondent based on Ext.P2 provisional list. 2. The petitioner is working as High School Assistant (Mathematics) in the Puthoor Government Vocational Higher Secondary School. She applied for transfer to the Anchery Government Higher Secondary School in the General Transfer for 2011-12 and was placed as Serial No.5 in the ranked list prepared by the second respondent (Ext.P1). According to the petitioner, the third respondent, who is serial No.10 in Ext.P1 list, has also sought transfer to Anchery Government Higher Secondary School. But, when the provisional list was published, the third respondent is shown as eligible for posting in the Anchery Government Higher Secondary School on the basis that she belongs to SC/ST Community. The same is objected to by the W.P.(C). No.14727/2011 -:2:- petitioner as per Exts.P4 and P5 representations before respondent Nos.1 and 2. It is submitted that the provisional list has not been finalised so far. 3. In that view of the matter, there will be a direction to the first respondent to consider the objections raised by the petitioner in Ext.P4 representation. The same will be considered before finalising Ext.P2 provisional list. The petitioner will produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of the Judgment before the first respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE