IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10973 of 2011 Raj Nandan Thakur, son of Late Makku Thakur, Resident of village Gohi, P.O. Gohi, P.S. Waris Nagar, District Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Treasury Officer, Samastipur, Dist. Samastipur. 2. The Treasury Officer, Samastipur, District Samastipur. 3. The State Bank of India through the Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna. 4. The Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna. 5. The Deputy General Manager, State Bank of India, Central Pension Processing Centre, Judges Court Road, Anta Ghat, Patna. 6. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Kishanpur Branch, District Samastipur. ... ... Respondents. ----------- 2. 12.7.2011. Heard Shri Vijay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt. Shashi Priya Pathak, learned A.C. to A.A.G.7, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2/State and Shri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf respondent nos.3 to 6/State Bank of India. The present writ petition was filed with a prayer to direct the respondents to credit the amount of pension into the account of the petitioner since payment order was already issued by the Treasury Officer. 2 Learned counsel for the parties, at the time of hearing, informs the court that after filing of the writ petition, the amount as per payment order has already been credited to the account of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the bank, on instruction, has given plausible explanation regarding delay in crediting the amount of pension into the account of the petitioner for which Bank cannot be held responsible. In such situation, no order can be passed for giving interest on such delay. In view of the facts and circumstances, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)