IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 18TH MAY 2010 / 28TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 11389 of 2010(W) ------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- K.P.MAHESH,MAHESH MANDIRAM, MARIATHURUTHU P.O., KOTTAYAM,REPRESENTED BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER T.C.THOMAS, THAKKADIYELPARAMBIL HOUSE,CHANNANIKAD P.O, CHENNANIKADU KARA,PANACHIKKADU VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK,KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY,REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CUM REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, KOTTAYAM. R1 & R2 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.11389 of 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of April, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is a stage carriage operator conducting services on the route Cherthala-Kottayam with vehicle bearing Reg.No.KL-35/3802. The petitioner has filed a petition for variation of his permit which is Ext.P1. According to the petitioner, no orders have been passed on Ext.P1 till date. 2. The learned Senior Government Pleader Mr.K.C.Santhosh Kumar submits that the application is being got enquired into and that immediately on receipt of report of the enquiry, the application for variation would be considered and appropriate orders would be passed thereon. He assures that proceedings would be completed expeditiously. 3. In the above circumstances, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the application submitted by the petitioner for the variation of his permit evidenced herein by Ext.P1, after obtaining the wpc No.11389/2010 2 report of the Field Officer, in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders thereon as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE css/