.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1805 OF 1997 Association of Engineering Workers ...Petitioner. Versus The Premier Automobiles Ltd., and Ors. ...Respondents. .... None for the Petitioner. Mr.Santosh Shetty, Advocate for the Respondents. .... CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 06, 2006. DECEMBER 06, 2006. DECEMBER 06, 2006. P.C.: . None appears for the petitioner. Mr.Shetty, the learned counsel for the respondents brought to our notice the order dated 30th September, 2002 passed by the Industrial Court, Mumbai whereby the main Application (MRTU) No.39 of 1990 itself was dismissed. The present Petition arises out of an interlocutory order passed in the said main application. In view thereof, the present Petition has become infructuous. Hence, Rule stands discharged. .[2]. 2. Mr.Shetty, the learned counsel for the respondents undertakes to inform this order immediately to Mr.M.N.Ganguli, the learned counsel for the petitioner. [DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]