IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2009 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 13396 of 2009(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- N.K.SASIDHARAN, S/O. KUTTAPPAN, AGED 51 YEARS, NALAOTHUKUMVEETTIL, AMBATTUKAVU DESOM, THAIKKATTUKARA DESOM, ALUVA WEST VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C).No.13396 of 2009 ------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of May, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner claims title, to an extent of 7.392 cents of land and building standing there, by virtue of a sale deed dated 30.5.2008 executed by the First Additional Sub Court, Ernakulam. The assignment was pursuant to the decree passed by the Sub Court, Ernakulam in O.S.No.272/07, for specific performance of an agreement of sale. The property was delivered. Thereafter, the petitioner applied for mutation of the same. The petitioner is aggrieved by the delay in effecting mutation under the Transfer of Registry Rules. The petitioner refers to Ext.P3 order passed by the Sub Court, Ernakulam requiring the Village Officer to effect necessary changes in accordance with the Revenue Records. 2. Where a property has been assigned in favour of a person under orders of a court, the transfer of W.P.(C).No.13396 of 2009 :: 2 :: registry will have to be effected by the Revenue Authorities in accordance with the orders passed by the court. If there is any objection in that regard, that must be intimated to that person. That was also not done in this case. 3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 1st respondent to proceed to effect transfer under the Transfer of Registry Rules in relation to the property covered by sale deed No.2565/2008 in favour of the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. If, by any chance, there is any objection on the part of the 1st respondent in effecting such mutation, an order shall be communicated to the petitioner explaining the reasons for not effecting mutation. This shall be done within the aforementioned time. 4. Writ petition is disposed of as above. W.P.(C).No.13396 of 2009 :: 3 :: A copy of the writ petition shall be produced by the petitioner along with a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. Sd/- (V.GIRI) JUDGE sk/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge