^r IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w,P, (C) N0. 5^5'^ / 2006 Petitioner ^ Smt. Shakila Begum^ W/o Zuber Ahmad, K, ^ '^..1.0^^.^ Aged about 38 years' .No..^-- cd"...£r^s^^"« R/°Near old Bus stand> P(esen 'i^;,.\.c'..-b" Main Road, Pendra Road, to Dist: Bilaspur-(C.G.) Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh^ Through - The Secretary Nagariya Nikay Prashasan, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipiir, Dist: Raipiu--(C.G.) The State Elecfion Commission,/-- Chhattisgarh, Through - Chief Election Commissioner, D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) Shri R.P.Mishra ^ Election OfBcer, Nagar Panchayat GoureUa, Election 2004 Tehsil Office, Pendra Road, Dist: Bilaspur-(C.G.) •^•"*'°"" '"- *- *°««°s«a.,«=B3M.cs=^s;ia^as^^ra^^i^^ i^iyi—i • iiujiiiiiiiii 111111 iiu (2) 4. District Election OfEcer, ^ Through - CoUector Bilaspur Dist: BUaspur-(C.G.) 5. Smt. Geeta Gupta ^ W/o Madan Lal Gupta, Aged about 37 years, R/o Near State Bank GoureUa, Pendra Road, Dist: BUaspur- (C.G.) 6. Smt. Geeta Soni ^ W/o Mahendra Soni Aged about 44 years,' R/o MangU Bazar, Near Water Tank, Pendra Road, Bilaspur, Dist: BHaspur-(C.G.) 7. Smt. Asha Begum ^- W/o LatifAhmad, Aged about 32 years, R/o Deepu Para, GoureUa, Pendra Road, Dist: BUaspur-(C.G,j 8. Smt. Sandhya Rao,. W/o Shri Rajendra Kumar, Aged about 32 years, R/o.MainRoad, Pendra Road, Dist: Bilaspur-(C.G.) ;^^L^^>;^-::^-^,*s-KteKf (S) (3) WRIT PETITION U/A 227 OFTHE_CONSTITUTION OFJNDIA XI-HC-78 *11HCII flWlth ysf •<(i<iio<i, oTn«'is,[sini^y i^J. /? (C) No. ^^-531'^OV^ WW""" •""""""/ TPT 21 ^[200 3TT^?T TaW (ijcit^qi,^) sn^rwfeH; tW3TI^Tsniro Vcrfr B^IRKHfeT-sn^T 09.10.2006 Shri AsnoK &oni, counse Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Ad' Heard on admission. Order dictated as follows OfeALORDER SUN1LKUMARSINHA, This fe a petition fiied ur against the impugned order (Election matter) 3/2005 pen. District Judge (FTC), Pendra Ri By way of impugned ord praver for caliing the Revenue certificate of the petitioner in A the caste-certificate itself and tl issuance of the caste-certificats learned Court directed the. : re: for withdrawal of this petition appropriate stage. This is not opposed bv l€ as withdrawn with.the aforesaid qii'iiFM'fl-f iiK<'iTfftei^)'<Rit^i<. ^arf^irsniRT ror tnepetitioner. ocate for the State on advance coov. 09.10.2006) der Article 227 ofthe Constitutionof India, dated 20.09.2006 passed in Case No. Jing in the Court of Learned Additional iad. er, Learned Election Court has refused the Officer as a witness who issued the caste- looppur on 18.11.2004 on the ground that ie copy of entire proceedings pertaining to were aiso on record. While doing so, the ipondent No.5. to produce all other entire evidence whatsoever she likes.l After arguing forsometirhe, iearned counsel for the petitioner pravs with libertv to raise his grievance at the arned counse! for the State. The petition, filed again^t the order dated 20.09.2006, is dismissed liberty granted in favour oft^e petitioner Sd/- SunU Kumar Sinha Judge tss.ti-H