IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 11839 of 2009 Date of decision August 7, 2009 Manjit Singh ....... Petitioner Versus Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Gurdaspur and others. ........ Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. R. K. Arya, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? No K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. The award in challenge is at the instance of the workman whose reference was rejected on the ground that it was grossly belated having approached the Court nearly 13 years after the services were alleged to have been terminated. Even on factual consideration of whether that there had been a relationship of employer and employee, the Labour Court found that there had been no such relationship and found that it was not possible to grant any relief to the workman. No new point has been urged in the writ petition to assail the award of the Labour Court as suffering from any vice of non-consideration of important materials. 2. There is no scope for interference in revision and it is dismissed. No costs. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 7, 2009 archana