AB 684/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.K.MUSAHARY Heard Mr. A. Roshid, learned counsel for the accused petitioners. Also h eard Mr. B. S. Sinha, learned Addl. P.P., Assam. The accused petitioners, elected members of Mandia Anchalik Panchayat, h ave been implicated in connection with Baghbar P.S. Case No. 14/2011(correspondi ng to G.R. Case No. 297/2011) u/ss. 448/325/353/427/34 IPC. CD, as called for, has been produced today. I have perused the same. The allegation against the accused petitioners, as per the FIR, is that they entered the office room of the BDO and man-handled him after a hot argument regarding distribution of CGI sheets under CM’s Welfare Schemes. In the investigation, it is found that the accused petitioners man-handled the B DO and one of his sub-ordinate staff. The IO has already collected the necessary materials after examining the witness es and the investigation is almost complete. In view of the above, I feel there is no necessity of custodial interrogation of the accused petitioners. Moreover, being the public representatives at the gras s root democratic institution, I am of the considered opinion that there is no l ikelihood of the accused petitioners jumping the bail or avoiding the due proces s of law if they are granted the privilege of pre-arrest bail. Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest in connection wi th Baghbar P.S. Case No. 14/2011(corresponding to G.R. Case No. 297/2011) u/ss. 448/325/353/427/34 IPC, accused petitioners, namely, Abdul Jalil Mondal and Abdu r Roshid, shall be enlarged on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 30,000/- ea ch with one local surety each of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the arresting authority on the condition that they shall make themselves availab le before the investigating authority as well as learned trial court as and when required. The bail application stands disposed of.