IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8507 of 2009 MAHESH KUMAR, Son of Raja Manjhi, resident of village – Kishanpur, P.S. Bathnaha, District – Sitamarhi. …. Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL (PERSONNEL), Bihar, Patna. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, Sitamarhi. …. Respondents. ----------- 02/ 23.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner was an applicant for appointment on the post of Sub-Inspector of Police in the light of Advertisement No. 704/04 issued by the Bihar Staff Selection Commissioner, Patna. Having undergone the selection process he was selected for such appointment as is evident from the result published in the news paper on 5.2.2009, Annexure -3. The appointment letter is not being issued to him in the light of the press publication issued by the office of the Deputy Inspector of Police (Personnel) in the news paper on 13.6.2009 as contained in Annexure – 11 filed along with the supplementary affidavit and with reference to the said notice, it is submitted that petitioner is not being provided with the letter of appointment as verification of his character is still pending. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states with reference to the police report submitted by the Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi bearing letter no. 101 dated 2.2.2009 and letter no. 271 dated 6.3.2009 as contained in Annexures – 8 and 8/1 that his character has already been verified and report already received and there should not be any impediment in the way of the respondents in handing over the - 2 - appointment letter to the petitioner so that he can also proceed for training along with others, who have already joined for training. In this connection, learned counsel submitted that petitioner has invited the attention of the Deputy Inspector General of Police (Personnel), Bihar, Patna under his representation dated 11.2.20009 and 13.2.2009, which are contained in Annexures – 9 and 10 and it is submitted that the representations have not yet engaged the attention of the learned Deputy Inspector General of Police (Personnel) in the light of the verification report dated 2.2.009 and 6..3.2009 as contained in Annexures – 8 and 8/1. 4. Having heard the counsel for the parties, I direct the Deputy Inspector General of Police (Personnel) to consider the representation dated 11/13.2.2009, Annexures – 9 and 10 as early as possible in any case within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. DKS/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)