IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. ORDER 4.4.2008. S.B. CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.155/2006 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Shri Sudesh Bansal, for the petitioner. Shri M.S. Kachawa} Shri R.A. Sharma }, for th respondent. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. An Application No.23787 dated 17.9.2007 has been filed by the petitioner seeking to bring on record the LRs. Of the non petitioner No.2. The said application is allowed. The LRs. Nos. 2/1 to 2/3 are ordered to be substituted in place of the non petitioner No.2. The amended cause title has been filed and the same may be taken on record. Learned counsel for the parties submitted that the revision may be heard. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By the impugned order the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC filed by the plaintiff petitioner in suit for fixation of standard rent, for dismissing the counter claim for eviction filed by the non petitioner No.2 who is the landlord has been dismissed. I have gone through the impugned order. It is admitted by the learned counsel for the plaintiff petitioner tenant that as per the case of the defendant No.1 the property in dispute vests with the respondent No.2 and therefore the defendant No.2 is the landlord. In that view of the matter the defendant No.2 is well within his rights to seek eviction of the tenant. The impugned order does not suffer from any jurisdictional error consequently the revision petition stands dismissed summarily. (DALIP SINGH),J. Ramchandrkhatri,PS