1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11341 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 20665 OF 2008 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant VERSUS Vitthal Satwa Burtukane ...Respondent W I T H CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11342 OF 2008 IN F.A.ST. NO.20653 OF 2008 ----- Shri K.G.Patil, A.G.P. for the applicants/State in both the applications. Shri V.V.Ingle, advocate for sole respondent absent in both the applications. ----- CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATED : 14th September, 2010 PER COURT : - 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicants. 2 2 These are applications preferred by the applicants for condonation of delay of 272 days in filing the accompanying First Appeals. 3 For the reasons stated in the applications, it appears that the applicants have explained the delay satisfactorily. Moreover, it also appears that the said delay is not willful, deliberate or intentional and certainly it is not inordinate, and hence, same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4 In the result, present applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 272 days caused in filing both the accompanying First Appeals stands condoned and said appeals be registered and numbered and present applications are disposed of accordingly. [SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.] dbm/ca11341.08 3