IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 12276 of 2009 Between: 1 D.Shanker Reddy S/o.Late D.Ramachandra Reddy R/o.11-18-172, Doctors colony, Saroornagar 2 D.Shiva Kalyan Chakravarthi Reddy S/o.D.Shanker Reddy R/o.11-18-172, Doctors colony, Saroornagar 3 D.Raghavendra Reddy S/o.D.Shanker Reddy R/o.11-18-172, Doctors colony, Saroornagar petitioners No.1 to 3 are rep.by thier GPA Sri.Prem Kumar S/o.late Jagdish Prasad, aged about 50 years Occ:Business R/o.H.No.3-6-207/2, Street No.16, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Secretary, Revenue Department, SEcretariat, Building, Hyderabad 2 The Dy.Director ,Survey and Land Records, Collectorate complex, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly in thenature of mandamus declaring the ction of 2nd respondent in not demarcating the land in Sy.No.129/30 correlated to TS.No.22 Ward No.12, Blcok, K.Admeasuring Ac.3.13 gts situated at Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Shaikpet, village, Hyderabad as being illegal, having received the fee for demarcation and survey charges as per the challan bearing No.204 dated 5.7.2007 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MRSYED SHAREEF AHMED Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: The singular grievance in this writ petition is as to the inaction of the 2nd respondent in surveying and demarcating the land of an extent of Ac. 3.13 gts in S.No. 129/30 correlated to T.S.No. 22, Ward No. 12, Block K, Road No. 12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. On instructions, the learned Government Pleader for Revenue states that the 2nd respondent has already by Memo A5/370/09 dt. 6.3.2009 addressed Sri. Mohdi Hussain, an Advocate who had issued lawyer’s notice on behalf of the petitioner stating that one “Abdulla Sab” is the registered holder of the land in question and therefore demarcation cannot be done, at the instance of the petitioner who claims title through “Abdulla Pasha”. The learned Counsel for the petitioner disclaims receipt of any such order passed by the 2nd respondent. A copy of the order has however been handed over to the learned Counsel for the petitioner today. On receipt of the same, the learned Counsel states that the petitioner would like to pursue appropriate remedy before an appropriate forum. Granting the liberty as available to litigate under appropriate strategy, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ GODA RAGHURAM.J 28.7.2009. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No. 12276 of 2009 Dated: 28.7.2009.