- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO.105/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2930/2009 Santosh Gangadhar Satpute. ...Applicant.. Versus Union of India & others. ...Respondents... ..... Shri S.D. Pokharkar, Advocate for applicant. Shri Alok Sharma, Standing Counsel for respondent no.1. Shri V.B. Ghatge, AGP for respondent nos.5 & 6. ..... CORAM: P.V. HARDAS & A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE: 14.08.2009 PER COURT: We have heard the learned counsel for the applicant in support of various grounds, which are urged in the review application. With the assistance of the learned counsel for the applicant, we have also perused the findings recorded by the Division Bench while dismissing Writ Petition No. 2930/2009 on 14.7.2009 by imposing cost of Rs.5,000/-. Upon perusal of the order sought to be reviewed, we do not find any error apparent on the face of - 2 - the record to warrant the exercise of review jurisdiction. Consequently, this civil application fails and is summarily dismissed. (A.V. Potdar, J.) (P.V. Hardas, J.) ndk/c1480936