^ ^3^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT "NO. 61 / 2006 PETITIONERS ft' .rf^ $s^ ^p-' (P'\ \.c v^ <s; .0< ^fc^ Vyas Narayan Diwakar, S/o. Sri Surit Ram, aged about 41 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Boys Higher Secondary School, Hardi Bazar, Distt. -Korba (C.G.) Shatruhan Singh Markam,' S/o. Late Sri Dayaram Markam aged about 39 years, Upper Division Teacher, Superintendent Post Mattrick Aadivashi Balak Chhatrawash Hardi Bazar, Distt.-Korba (C.G.) Gopal Prasad Lahre,/ S/o. Sri Meghram Lahre, aged about 40 years, Upper Division Teacher Govt. Higher Secondary School- Utarda, Distt. -Korba (C.G.) Bhagirathi Jangde, - S/o. Sri Sukhiram Jangde, aged about 40 years , Upper Division Teacher, Govt. (Tribal Welfare) High. School-Utarda Distt. -Korba (C.G.) Nagendra Kumar Srivastava,^ S/o. Sri Janardan Lal, aged about 42 years, Upper Division Teacher Govt. Boys Higher Secondary School, Hardi Bazar, Distt-Korba (C.G.) &-i 1 VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgrh, <•' Through - The Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner Tribal Welfare / Department, Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur Assistant Commissioner.- Tribal Welfare Department, Distt.-Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .4^ HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AJ BILASPUR W. P.(S)No. 5661 of 2006 Petitioners Vyas Narayan Diwakcu' & others Veraus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & others SB:1-lon'ble Mr. Justice Sattsh K. Agnthotri. J Shri Anif Sh^i Rajput, Adwcute for the petitioners. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Sovemment Advocate for the respondents/State. ORDBt (26th October, 2006) The following order of the Court ispassed by Satish K. Agrohotri. J. 1. By ttiis petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of Indkx. •the petitioners seek a direction to the re^wwidents to pay •the ncrements ond seniority on the baeis of the date of their initial oCT>ointments h the light of -the decision rendered by •the teamed State Administnrtwe Tribunal, Jabatpur in O.A. No. 1452/98 (Hcrish Chand Smgh & o'thers Vs. Sftite of MP. & others) dcrted 31.1.2000, O.A.No. 802/98 (Akhilesh Mishra & olhers Vs. State of Atadhyu Pradesh & others) ond O.A.No. 991/98 (Rnmayun Preaad DtwveA A others Vs. State of MP. A olhera). 2. Learned counsel appearin9 for tte petitkmers placed on record a copy of the order doted 23.3200bptiaaed by •this Court 'm Writ Petition No. 2577/2003 (NemSin^i Thokur and o'thers Vs. 5tute of .1 s+uapuodsAi w^. tMi4 ui puo saouttA8i^6 jjai((. |p SINSUM 's+uapuodsa^ ai|4. o^ Aipot iMOdj, s)|»am OH^ ^.o poi^ad o uiii+uw uoj4.n|.uas3jda^ o awfDUi o+ pamo|p a»s.rauoit.i+ad 9^- 'ajoyhiw^ •a|qcuosoa>i aq o+ sjoaddo suauoi+i+ad ai|4. jo^. |s»uno3paiuuai As^ apmu jaAud pa4.iui!| 9^ tjimy siijt. J.o uoiuitlo ai|<. ui 'asno 34). J.o saMiatsuinMjo puo sywf. 9^ «4-pJ»6w6UJAOI| pUB sai^md wj^. .loj. |asun<»pauji»|p^oai) SUIADI-I •g 'uoipaTqo ou soi) |asura»at.oi.s paujoai tpiijM o^ 'OOOZ'T'TE PaW punqi-'l 3A!4iBJ+S!UjUipy 34.114.5 w^ }o MpM SM^ j.0 4.un033D UO SJ3lpOa+ patjani.is A(JD|iuns j«|4.o 04. pauoi+auos uaaq aArn) ip!i|»i'apaos A)d aums 34). puo sjauoi+i+ad ai|<. a). 4.uau4»ai4. joijtUjs a/u6 ft|, S4.uapuodsa^ ai|4. o(. uoipai.uaea.idai B a>pMU o+ paiw||D aq fsm s.wuoi+y.ad vu^ +BI+I. s+iaiqns sjauoi+i+ad wift. ^ |asun<»paujny] •^ •uoi+i+ad 8144. 'sniu. 'paat) Auopiod +ou Wfc^ s+uapuodsa^ av^ +nq 'sjaipoai uoisiAiq ^addfi pa^cn+is X|jB|ituis osp 9w AMJ^. so 4.uau4i»u4. auuw 944. p^oaao 04, suoi+nt.uasajidaj p.ia*as apou sj»uoi(4+ad ai|i 'aiuns w^. pawo|p OOOZ'I'TS Pa+BP .Bpjo apiA |Bunqi^i patkn»| uaj3t|w 'afass ^^d JD|n6a^ jo^ jndpqoj' 'p4nquj. aA^iMtSiuiiupy avo^Q w^. paAou suaipoai. pa+ian+K A|JD|IUIIS ^9v^o "»|iws ^od dD|n6aj ai|4. uaAiS +ou a.iam /ai|4. +n<] pazuo|n6a^ 9J»M sjauoj4.j4.ad Mtt 'uoi+Bqo^d sjoaA oin+ .(.o uoj+a|dtuo3 .layo uo jai.n) 'jaAawo|-| •4«>|BSpaxij. atj4. 4).jM s^oaA OM|. j.o pouad o joj. u<n4»qojd uo ^.uaui-nxteQ uoj+conpg |ooips ai|4. ui sjaipnai UOISIAJQ jaddn SD pai.uioddo ajam ^ai||. vw^ »•"»sjauoi+ii-ad aiK. ^o sasco av^ •g 'paBscd aq /cu japjo joijiuis 3141. 'aMf.a.iav^- 'pa+wu.® A|JD|!UIB aw sdauoi+i+ad »i|*+oi|4. s+iuqns puo (sjai|4.o y i|jo6sj+4Bi|t|3 w shall decide Ihe said pepresentation 'm an objeetive manner *»i1hin a period of 30 days froip the do*e of recept of sudi represtmtatwn. after considering all -the points raised by Ihe petitioiws and tafcing into accoijnt the order dated 31.1^000 paaed fay -the leamed State Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 1452/98. and if ttw petitioners stand on -the same footings, as -the petitioners in •the OA No. 1452/98 -then they be also sonctioned -the same pay scale cnd seniority. 6. This twit petition is accordingly diapased of wMh the aforeaid direction, No order os to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Boblu