IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1536 of 2008 PRAMOD KUMAR Versus RAM CHANDRA PRASAD ----------- 2. 15.9.2008 Surendra/ Heard counsel for the parties. In the opinion of this Court, the order passed under section 15 of the B.B.C.Act does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. Once this position is admitted that the petitioner is a tenant and the opposite party is a landlord, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order which has only directed to deposit the admitted last rent. The submission of the counsel for the petitioner that though such amount may be directed to deposit but the opposite party landlord should not be allowed to withdraw is to be noticed for its being rejected because once it is admitted that the opposite party is a landlord he has definitely right to get the rent. That being so, this Court does not find any merit in this application, which is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)