IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.36621 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 12, 2011 Yadwinder Singh @ Teena ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Angel Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, DAG, Punjab, for the State. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner prays for anticipatory bail. It was submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he had not identified the person, who was impersonated while executing the sale deed. The petitioner being Lambardar had witnessed the sale deed. Notice was issued and in response, State counsel says that Hem Raj, who had identified Budh Singh, has stated that he had identified the deceased person as Budh Singh on the asking of the petitioner. That being the position, it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. The submission that co-accused have been released on regular bail would not justify the release of the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The petitioner is accordingly dismissed. December 12, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE