1 WP 4300.2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4300 OF 2011 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr.Subhash Gaikwad,Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.V.G.Shelke, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for State. .......................... CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 22/06/2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard Mr.Subhash Gaikwad, the learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr.V.G.Shelke, learned Assistant Govt. Pleader for State. 2. Mr. Gaikwad, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the proper procedure has not been followed while passing the resolution of no confidence motion. In fact, no meeting had taken place and just a farce was created of the meeting. The signatures of five ( 5 ) members have been taken subsequently. This is eloquent from the fact that the proceedings bear hand writing of two ( 2 ) different persons. According to the learned counsel, when the proceedings have not been properly conducted, the no confidence motion passed is illegal. 2 WP 4300.2011 3. The Commissioner had called the explanation from the Tahsildar, who had given the explanation that as he was not knowing the names of the members, he had asked the Gram Sevak to write said names. 4. The notice of the meeting was served on all the persons. Even it is not the case of the petitioner that he had been to the meeting and had not found any one. The petitioner himself was absent in the meeting. As such, when he himself was absent, he can not make such grievance as he would not be aware of the proceedings that had taken place. 5. The authority have properly considered the aspect of the matter. 6. In light of the above, no interference is called for in the supervisory jurisdiction of this court. The Writ Petition as such is dismissed however with no order as to costs. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ] KNP/WP 4300.2011