IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 16TH DECEMBER 2011 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 4311 of 2011() ---------------------------------- CC.169/2008 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, CHENGANNUR .................... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED -------------------------------------- SUMA @ AMBILI, AMBALATHAM VILAYIL HOUSE, VENMONY P.O., CHENGANNUR. BY ADVS. SRI. IYPE JOSEPH SRI.V.MANOJ KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): STATE & DEFACTO-COMPLAINANT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 31. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VENMONY POLICE STATION, CHENGANNUR - 689 509. 3. VALSALA MOHAN, W/O.MOHAN PANICKER, NANDANAM HOUSE, KODUKULANJI KAROD, VENMONY VILLAGE. PIN - 689 509. R1 & R2 BY ADV.SMT.JASMINE, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: DG Crl.MC.No. 4311 of 2011() APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A1 : CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT FILED AS C.C. NO.169/2008 BEFORE THE JUDICIAL 1ST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT - 1, CHENGANNUR. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES - NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE DG N.K. BALAKRISHNAN,J. ------------------------------------ Crl.M.C.No. 4311 of 2011 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 16th day of December, 2011 ORDER Petitioner is the accused in CC.169/08 of JFCM - I, Chengannur. The offences alleged against him are under Sections 465 IPC and 12(b) of Indian Passport Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even if the entire allegations made in the charge sheet and the statements of the witnesses are taken altogether the offences will not lie and as such the charge against the petitioner has to be quashed. This submission is resisted by the learned Public Prosecutor. According the learned Public Prosecutor, after conducting thorough investigation, the charge sheet was laid against the accused. The charge sheet as well as the memorandum of evidence would show that there are materials to proceed with the trial of the case. 2. The case was pending before the trial court from 2008 onwards. This petition has been filed only now. Crl.M.C.No. 4311 of 2011 -: 2 :- I find no reason to interfere with the proceedings pending before the trial court. The petitioner can raise all his contentions before the trial court. This petition is disposed of accordingly. N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. smvd