IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.1700 of 2007 Amit Agrawal ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Mr A.M. Saraogi, Advocate for the applicant. Mr Rajesh More, APP for the State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V. C. DAGA,J. V. C. DAGA,J. V. C. DAGA,J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 29. 08. 2007. 29. 08. 2007. 29. 08. 2007. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. Perused application and the material available on record. 3. The applicant is seeking bail in CR No. 121 of 2007 registered with E.O.W. J.B.C.B. C.I.D. Crime Branch for the offence under Sections 409, 406, 420, 120B of the I.P.C. 4. After having perusal of the statements of the witnesses placed on record and the findings recorded by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay in its order dated 17.5.2007 rejecting application for bail, it is not possible to say that there is no material on record to connect the accused-applicant with the offence alleged. Prima facie material, thus, exists against the applicant to connect him with the offence alleged. Investigation is still in progress. It is also necessary for the Investigating Officer to investigate as to from which source the negotiable instruments have come. In this view of the matter, in my view, custodial interrogation is necessary. 5. In the result, application is rejected. 6. Any observation made in this order shall not be construed as any finding or any expression of opinion on the merits of the case at the time of trial. (V.C. (V.C. (V.C. DAGA,J.) DAGA,J.) DAGA,J.)