IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1089 OF 2003 IN TEST.SUIT NO.19 OF 2000 IN TEST.PETITION NO.884 OF 1999 G.D.Vazirani .. Plaintiff Vs. V.D.Vazirani & Ors. .. Defendants And Naraindas Naryani .. Respondent And Asha Sunder Shivdasani . Applicant Mr.Rohini Jaisinghani for the plaintiff Mr.Shyam Mehta with Mr.Sustafa Doctor i/b M/s. Hariani & Co. for the defendant Mr.Sheraz Rustomjee for the Intervenors Mr.J.Reis with Mr.Y.M.Chaudhari for the applicant CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J DATED : 17TH JUNE, 2005 DATED : 17TH JUNE, 2005 DATED : 17TH JUNE, 2005 P.C.: 1. The learned counsel for the applicant states that in view of the fact that she is not a party to the present consent terms, the same does not bind the applicant. In view thereof, the learned counsel does not seek to press the present Notice of Motion. Motion is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant further states that the liberty be given to make necessary application if and when cause of action arises, Motion disposed of as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.