S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10860/2009 Daula Ram Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 14.12.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.M.S.Godara,for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner was appointed on contract basis. His termination order was dated 22.04.2009 and that order,according to the petitioner, is illegal as the petitioner's contract has not been terminated by giving one months notice and further his term has been terminated with stigma that his work was not satisfactory. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that term of the contract was up to May 2009. The petitioner's contract was terminated vide order dated 22.04.2009 and according to petitioner himself, his term could have been up to May 2009, that is , for one more month. The petitioner cannot claim his continuation beyond the period of contract, therefore only for claiming relief for one more month, this writ petition has been filed by challenging the order dated 22.04.2009. I do not find any reason to permit the petitioner to invoke extra ordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for such a trivial matter. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA),J. Bharti/-