IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 15343 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: September 9, 2010. Shokeen ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Satish Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh, A.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.421 dated 07.12.2009, under Sections 148/149/323/325/427/452/307 IPC, registered at Police Station Punhana, District Mewat. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. CRM No.M-15343 of 2010 Brief allegations are that, petitioner alongwith co-accused was armed with firearm and injuries were caused indiscriminately by all the accused with firearm. There are as many as 11 persons who received injuries on the side of complainant party. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that no specific injury was attributed to the petitioner. However, bail application has been vehemently opposed by learned counsel for the State on the plea that there are serious allegations against the petitioner and co-accused and the firearm used by the petitioner is yet to be recovered. Hence, in view of these facts, it is not such a case in which extra- ordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner- accused. Hence, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the instant application for anticipatory bail filed by petitioner –Shokeen is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of merit. Interim order dated 26.05.2010 already granted in his favour stands vacated. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) September 9, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2