IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.358 of 2010 KAMLESH JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5 04.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The prayer of the petitioner is for directing the authorities to make some enquiry as petitioner is falsely being implicated in several cases. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State. Learned counsel for the State submits that the prayer as well as the averments made in the writ application is vague and as such the writ application deserves to be dismissed. Considering the submissions of the parties and their respective pleadings, the writ application appear to be misconceived for want of any clarity either in the prayer or in the averments made therein. In view of the above, the writ application stands dismissed. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)