IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 24TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 2ND ASWINA 1932 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 345 of 2004(C) ---------------------------- CRA.447/2002 OF SESSIONS COURT, THRISSUR CC.1127/1999 OF JUDL. MAGISTRTE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-III, THRISSUR ................. REVN. PETITIONER / APPELLANT/ACCUSED : --------------------------------------------------------------- THANKACHAN, S/O. ISAC, ANCHERIYIL HOUSE, NADATHARA VILLAGE, VALAKKAVE, THRISSUR. BY ADVS. SRI.C.A.CHACKO SMT.C.M.CHARISMA SMT.SONIYA.M RESPONDENTS / RESPONDENTS / COMPLAINANT AND STATE : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SAID MUHAMMED, S/O. KOYA, THOPPILAKATH, MULLAKKARA, OLLUKARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY ADVS. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU SMT.P.MAYA R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. SABU SREEDHARAN THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn P.S.GOPINATHAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.R.P.No.345 of 2004. = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 24th day of September, 2010. O R D E R The Revision Petitioner was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III, Thrissur in CC.No.1127/1999 for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to simple imprisonment for a period of one month and to pay Rs.35,000/- as compensation to the first respondent/the defacto complainant. Aggrieved by the above conviction and sentence, he preferred Crl.Appeal No.447/2002. By the impugned judgment dated 15.12.2003, while confirming the conviction, the sentence was reduced to imprisonment till the rising of the Court. The compensation was enhanced to Rs.50,000/-. Assailing the legality, correctness and propriety of the above conviction and sentence as modified in appeal, this revision petition was filed. 2. Today, when the revision petition came up for Crl.RP.No.345/2004. -: 2 :- hearing, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the revision petitioner is seeking only time for payment of compensation. The submission is recorded. The revision petition is dismissed. The revision petitioner is granted four months time to remit the compensation. Till then, the bail bond executed by him shall remain in force. P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE. Kvs/-