IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41916 of 2008 NIRAJ KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 23.10.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case under Section 384 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no criminal offence is made out. This petitioner is an employee of the Maurya Motors Ltd an authorized dealer of TATA Motor. The complainant purchased vehicle on loan and executed an agreement containing payment schedule as well as clause of repossession in failure of repayment of installment of loan in schedule time. It appears from the complaint petition that the petitioner defaulted in payment of loan installment as a result of which the vehicle was repossessed by the company. The main person, dealer of Maurya Motor, has already been granted anticipatory bail by another Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc.No.37487/08. This petitioner is an employee of Maurya Motor. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks of receipt of this order, the petitioner named above shall be releases on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10, 000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in Complaint Case No. C.I/1092 of 2007 subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. B.Jha (Ghanshyam Prasad) - 2 -