1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 733 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra and others .. Petitioners Versus Dagdu S/o Marutirao Vidyagar .. Respondent Shri S. K. Kadam, A.G.P. for Petitioners. Shri A. S. Deshpande, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : P. V. HARDAS AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 23RD JULY, 2010. PER COURT : . This is a petition at the behest of the State, challenging the order of the Aurangabad Bench of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 31.08.2009. The respondent made a grievance before the Tribunal by filing Original Application No. 357/2009 contending therein that juniors to the respondent had been promoted while the claim of the respondent was not considered. The Tribunal examined the matter and at paragraph 5 of the order impugned in the present petition has concluded that the respondent was not at all considered for 2 promotion, though juniors to the respondent were promoted. The non consideration of the respondent was principally based upon the erroneous seniority list. It was only when the seniority list was corrected and standing of the respondent in the seniority list was restored, then the respondent was promoted. The Tribunal therefore, at paragraph 9 has concluded that the present respondent ought to have been granted deemed date of promotion i. e. from 31.08.1994 being the date on which junior to the respondent had been promoted. 2. We have heard Shri Kadam, learned Assistant Governmetn Pleader on behalf of petitioner in support of the various grounds which are urged before us. We have also perused the findings recorded by the Tribunal and upon such perusal, we do not notice any perversity in the reasoning of the Tribunal to warrant any interference in the extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Thus the petition therefore being devoid of merits is summarily dismissed with no order as to costs. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [ P. V. HARDAS, J.] bsb/July 10