IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40475 of 2010 PANKAJ KUMAR @ PANKAJ RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 10.11.2010 Petitioner is languishing in custody since 24.08.2010 in a case registered under Sections 302, 120B/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged that two persons came at the vehicle and one of them was Prabhat Kumar who alleged to have fired at Ranjeet Thakur causing injuries on the chest. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the F.I.R. the presence of this petitioner has not been mentioned but in the later part the hands of the petitioner has been suspected due to the bona fide contractual business dispute for which it is alleged that threatening was given. The Sessions Judge order reflects that the telephone from which the threatening was given was found to be registered in the name of one Sumit Kumar. It is further submitted that due to the business dispute the petitioner filed the informatory petition as contained in Annexure-2 prior to the present F.I.R. apprehending the false implication in the case. Considering the fact that there is specific 2 allegation of assault against Prabhat Kumar, let the petitioner namely Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Rai, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Shastrinagar P.S. Case No. 310 of 2010. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)