[1] IN THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 63 OF 2003 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 450 OF 2002 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION (L) NO. 175 OF 2002 IN SUMMARY SUIT NFO.1395 OF 2001 Vijay Tanks & Vessels Ltd. ... Appellant. [orig.plaintiffs.] Vs. Geekay Exim (India) Ltd. and Anr. ... Respondents. [orig.defendants.] Mr. Rohit Kapadia Sr. Advocate with Z.B.Kamdin & Vivek Vashi i/b. Bharucha & Partners for the appellant. Mr. H.N.Thakore with Sameer Khadekar i/b.Thakore Jariwala & Associates for respondent NO.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : D.K.Deshmukh and : D.K.Deshmukh and : D.K.Deshmukh and A.A.Sayed, A.A.Sayed, A.A.Sayed, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : February 24, 2009. : February 24, 2009. : February 24, 2009. [2] P.C. 1. By this appeal, the appellant challenges the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Chamber Summons No. 450 of 2002. The learned Counsel appearing for the appellant, who had taken out the Chamber Summons No. 450 of 2002, craves leave of this Court to withdraw the Chamber Summons. The Chamber Summons is permitted to be withdrawn, as a result, the order passed thereon does not survive rendering this appeal infructuous. The appeal is disposed of. [D.K.Deshmukh, [D.K.Deshmukh, [D.K.Deshmukh, J.] J.] J.] [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, J.] J.] J.]