WW Ema f GD Q? (WK ,p IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR wyLn No. $(o? 0 O OF 2009 / \AO gmlM/f and Civil Supplies Department D.K.S. Bahwan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) /’ 2. Additional Collector, Ramanujganj, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) // 3. Sub— Divisional Ofticer, (Revenue) Wadrafnagar, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE PETITIONER z/ Dhanraj Singh, Son of Shri Kalyan Singh, (Sarpanch) aged about 41 years, Resident of Village— Pandri Police Station Raghunathnagar, Block — Wadrafnagar, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) ‘ VERSUS RESPONDENTS /i. State of Chhattisgarh, Through— The Secretary, Food 2W 'r lilGH COURT QE CHHAT'l‘ISGARj—l AT BILASPUR WRIT PETIHON (C) No. 5200 of2009 ‘ ( PE’I‘ITIONER : Dhanraj Singh. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhauisgath & Others. W'Kli PE’I’i’l‘ION UNDER ARTLCLE 226 OF THE CONS’I'ITUTION OF INDIA m SB: Hon’ hie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shn V.K.Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. ’ S *i AV. Shridhar, Fame} Lawyer for the State/responéems. ORDER (URAL) (PaSSedW {m M day of Jum, 201G) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. on instructions. submits ihat the petitioner does not-want to contest thigv petition on merits. However, he prays that the respondent authorities may be directed to consider and decide his pending appeal dated 09.03.2009 (Annexure P/ii) as expeditiousiy as possihie. ‘2. Shri Shridhar, teamed counsel appearing for the State/respondems submits that ifthe above appeal ig still pending consideration, the same shail be considered and decided in accordance with law, within a period ofeight weeks non; today. . 3. ‘ in View ofthe foregoing, aecording to ieamed counsel appearing for the > petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication, #/ M ‘x ,XL r Satish KAgmhO‘“ sw— . . 4. Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of. Judge ,