1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 186 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 186 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 186 OF 2006 The Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Doodh Mahasangh Maryadit, Mumbai & anr. ... Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Ramchandra Yadav for Petitioner. None for Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : MARCH 20, 2006 DATED : MARCH 20, 2006 DATED : MARCH 20, 2006 P.C. . Rule. By consent heard forthwith. . On the last occasion, time was taken by the learned A.G.P. to seek instructions. When the matter is called out, none present for the respondent State. . The dispute in this petition was in the matter of payment of interest charges. The learned counsel points out that the clarification has been issued on 24.4.2000 and in terms of the said 2 clarifications, they have already paid the amount due and payable and in fact had paid the amount in excess . If that be the case, it will be for the Petitioners to apply to second respondent for whatever reliefs which they are entitled to in law. Considering the above and considering the notification dated 2.3.2006, nothing further survives in the petition which is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)