IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 165 of 1984 Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- HEIRS OF DECEASED UMAR JUMA Versus RAJAK DADA PATEL -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR SM SHAH for Petitioners MR CL SONI for Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 07/07/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr. C.L. Soni, learned counsel for the respondent-landlord, states that the petitioners-tenants have handed over peaceful and vacant possession to the landlord and therefore the present revision would not survive. Mr. Shah, learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute this statement because he has no specific instructions in the matter. Accordingly the revision application is treated as disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Interim relief stands vacated. **** *ar*