IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. &>’2j# /2010 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITIUTION OF THE INDIA PETITIONER Arun Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Radheshyam Agrawal, aged about 46 years, R/o. — Seth Basant Lal Marg, Ambikapur, Distt.— Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS r 7 1. State Transport Authority, Raipilr (C.G.) Secretary State' Transport Authority, Raipur (C.G.) HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR f WRIT PETITION (C) No. 2527 of 2010 PE‘ITI‘IONER : Anm Kumar Agrawal VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State Transpart Authority & another. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTU'I‘ION OF INDEA $3: Haii’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihatri, J. ‘ Present: Shri Anshul R. Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. .- V Ski“; Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respmdents. ‘ ORDER (ORAL (Passed on 14 day of June, 2010) f.4 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instmctions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits. However, he prays that the respondent authorities may be directed to consider and decide his pending appiication dated" 30.04.2009 (Annexure W2) as expeditiously as possible. 2. Shri Thakur. learned counsei appearing for the State/respondents submits that ifthe above application is stiil pending consideration, the same-shall be considered and decided in accordance with Iawi. within a period of eight weeks iiom today. In View ofthe foregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication. 4. Accordingy, the writ petition is disposed of. /‘ W v“ n;