IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5673 of 2011 VIKKY ROY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 13.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. The petitioner is not named in the FIR and it appears from perusal of the impugned order as well as from submission of the parties that in course of investigation, it was detected that the deceased, Santosh had love affairs with the sister of co-accused, Dheeraj Kumar and Neeraj Kumar and subsequently, co-accused, Dheeraj Kumar and Neeraj Kumar have struck a conspiracy alongwith the other accused including the petitioner and committed the murder of Santosh and one another person whose dead bodies were recovered from different places. So far as the petitioner is concerned, except the confessional statement of co- accused as well as the petitioner, there is nothing against him. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that several paragraphs of the case diary have been referred by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Patna but except the confessional statements, no material has come against the petitioner in the above-said paragraphs. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, namely, Vikky Roy be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten 2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Beur P.S. Case No. 64 of 2010, S.Tr. No 1355 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)