THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4605 of 2000 ORDER: The revision is filed against the order, dated 16.04.1999 passed by the Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad (for short ‘the State Commission’), in I.A.No.209 of 1999 in F.A.No.110 of 1999. The first respondent filed O.P.No.323 of 1996 before the District Forum, Kurnool, against respondent Nos.2 to 4 and the petitioner herein, complaining deficiency of service. The District Forum passed an order, dated 10.12.1998, holding that respondent Nos.2 to 4 and the petitioner herein are liable to pay a sum of Rs.48,600/- with interest @12% per annum. Aggrieved by that order, the petitioner filed F.A.No.110 of 1999 before the State Commission. He has also filed I.A.No.209 of 1999 for stay of the execution of the order in the O.P.. The State Commission dismissed the I.A. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Though notice was sent to the respondents to the same address as furnished in the I.A., it was not returned served. It is not known as to whether F.A.No.110 of 1999 is still pending. Be that as it may, while admitting the Civil Revision Petition, this Court passed an interim order on 27.10.2000 to the extent of granting stay of arrest of the petitioner. It was left open to the first respondent to recover the decretal amount through other modes. The validity of the order passed by the State Commission cannot be gone into at this stage. Suffice it to say that in case the appeal is still pending, it shall be open to the first respondent to recover the amount in question through modes prescribed under the Consumer Protection Act and the Rules made thereunder, except the one for arrest of the petitioner. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly, disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J 18th AUGUST, 2009. kvni