IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital the 28th day of November, 2002 Criminal Misc. Bail Application Number 1261 of 2002 Order on the Bail Application CRIMINAL SIDE Nazeem son of Mohd. Hamid alias Hanaif, r/o village Nagla Imarti, P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, District Hardwar. …………………..Applicant(s) Versus State of Uttaranchal. ……………….. Opposite Party _________________________________________________________________________ Arising out of- Case crime no. 235 of 2002, Under sections 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, District Hardwar _________________________________________________________________________ By the Court Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant-accused and Additional Government Advocate. In all the five cases shown against the applicant-accused, he is on bail. There is no previous conviction to the credit of the applicant and considering this fact, there are reasonable grounds to accept at this stage the argument that the applicant has not committed the offence and there is no likelihood of his involving himself in similar activity in future, if released on bail. Considering this aspect, in my opinion it is a fit case for bail. Let the applicant Nazeem son of Mohd. Hamid alias Hanaif, r/o village Nagla Imarti, P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, District Hardwar be released on bail in case crime no. 235 of 2002, under section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, District Hardwar on his filing a personal bond and adequate sureties to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Hardwar. 28.11.02./B. (Irshad Hussain, J.)