IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28953 of 2008 1. LAL YADAV @ KRISHNA SUMAN YADAV, SON OF POCHAYA YADAV 2. BINO YADAV, SON OF POCHAYA YADAV 3. SHIVJEE @ SHIVENDRA YADAV, SON OF BINO YADAV 4. DINESH YADAV, SON OF BALESH YADAV 5. DHIRENDRA YADAV, SON OF BALESH YADAV 6. NARESH YADAV, SON OF BINO YADAV 7. AASHISH YADAV, SON OF NARESH YADAV ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE KANJARI, P.S. BELDAUR, DISTRICT KHAGARIA. ------- PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. RAMJEE YADAV, SON OF LATE LABHAR YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KANJARI, P.S. BELDAUR, DISTRICT KHAGARIA ---- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2 21.6.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no. 2. This application has been filed challenging the order dated 10.6.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. I, Khagaria in Sessions Case No. 334 of 2007. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that once final form has been submitted, the Court could not take cognizance in this case. It is also submitted that there is no material to indicate that the petitioners are involved in the case of kidnapping the informant’s son. The Court below has referred to the evidence of six witnesses examined under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and has come to the conclusion that a prima facie case under Section 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code is made out against the petitioners. Considering the finding of the Court below, I am not inclined to interfere with the order dated 10.6.2008. This application is dismissed. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)