IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11664 of 2011 Ajay Prakash Sinha son of late Dr. Ramesh Chandra Lal, Resident of Mohalla – 38 Professor Colony Dighi West, P.S. Darbhanga Town, District Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The Vice Chancellor, L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga. 2. The Registrar, L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga. 3. The Finance Officer, L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga. 4. The Principal, Marwari College, Darbhanga. ... ... Respondents. ----------- 2. 20.7.2011. Heard Shri Arun Kumar Bhagat, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 3/L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 31.8.2005 from the post of Dean cum Head of the Department of Zoology, has prayed for directing the respondents to make payment of arrear of pension from September,2005 to June,2006, Leave Encashment, Gratuity and arrear of pension due to revise scale. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the claim made in the writ petition, the petitioner has filed representation before respondent no.1/Vice Chancellor of the L.N. Mithila University. However, neither any decision has been 2 taken on his representation nor his dues have been cleared till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for disposal of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent no.1 to take final decision on the representation. With the consent of parties, the writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh detailed representation before respondent no.1/Vice Chancellor within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no.1 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If the respondent no.1 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment and clearance of the dues within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, the respondent no.1 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of 3 such representation. It goes without saying that petitioner shall be entitled to get admissible statutory interest on delayed payment. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)