^ s.e HQ^ ^X-Q^ AMENDED PETITION IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 2619 OF 2004. PETITIONER o l^*T/tf° ^"^'1^....^^ ^^'-•"^\ te,£^--! A-, ft^...^ ^^,,^;;c:-L s^a.^ ^^r RESPONDENTS .,0'^' ..^'^.'. ^L^1 ^ S.N. UIEKAY, Son of Shri K.L. Uiekay aged about 49 years, Panchayat & Social Education Organiser, Janpad Panchayat Sajja, Distt : Durg (C.G.) VERSUS 1. 2. 3. State of Chhattisgarh through The Secretary, Panchayat & Social Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Raipur The Secretary, Department of Panchayat Avam Gramin Vikas Vibhag, Mantralaya , Raipur The Secretary, Panchayat & Social Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Raipur. g^s WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. HI@H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR Single Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Justic®Pritjnker Diwaker 5- Writ Petition No. 2619 of 2Q04 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS S.N. Uiskay Versvs State of Chhattisgarh and others, Dr, N,K. Shukla, iearned Senior Advocate with Shri V.P< Singh, counsel for 1+ie petitioner. Shri Viyek Sharma, PL for the State/respondents, WRIT PETmON UNDB^ ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (18.10.2010) ChGJIenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 4.8*2004 (Annexure P-7)passed by respondent No, 2 sending tiie petitioner, who is working as Social Educatipn OrgGnizer in the department of Panchciyat and Socjal Welfare, on deputort'ion to the department of Panchayat and Rural Deveiopment, Whiie entertaining this petition, on 24,9.2004 the stay order was gronted jn favour of the petitioner and by virtue of the said order, the petitioner is still working in his parent department i,e. PGrschayat and Sbcial Welfare Department. Counsel for the parties submit that the order impugned can be quashed by giving liberty to the State Sovernment to pass appropriate order in accordance with law, Considering the facts & circumstances of the case and aiso the submissions of both the parties, impugned order dated 4,8,2004 (Annexure P-7) sending the petitioner on deputation is quashed. :»- ••f' Respondents would be at liberty to pass appropriate order accordance with IGW, if so required, in Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge ^/