IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5721 of 2010 PAVITRI DEVI, W/O Ganga Das, resident of Village- Akauna, P.S. Deodha, District- Madhubani.......................................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR.............................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 31.03.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being an old lady apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the written report that on 26.06.2009 the petitioner took the informant’s daughter, namely, Bijita Kumari, with her and since then she was traceless for which the written report was lodged on 09.07.2009. It is also mentioned in the First Information Report that the son of the petitioner, namely, Santosh Kumar Das, used to visit the house of the informant. Subsequently, the victim was recovered and gave her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. in which she alleged that this petitioner offered her biscuit which caused unconscious to the victim but has not levelled any allegation against the petitioner’s son, Santosh Kumar Das. It is submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that actually the informant wanted to marry 2 his daughter with the son of the petitioner which has been refused by the petitioner which resulted in lodging of frivolous case. The prosecution case becomes doubtful in view of the fact that the victim left her house in the company of the petitioner on 26.06.2009 and the written report was lodged on 09.07.2009 and moreover the victim has not alleged anything against Santosh Kumar Das who was the main accused behind taking away the victim girl. In view of the aforesaid facts, the petitioner, Pavitri Devi, being a lady, is directed to be released on bail on her surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Deodha P.S. Case No. 31 of 2009(G.R. No. 1722 of 2009) on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)