IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 9464 of 2008. Decided on 18th December, 2010. _____________________________________________________ Ram Lal and Others. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. J.L. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): It is not disputed that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Nek Ram and Others Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others, CWP(T) No. 14232 of 2008, decided on 17th November, 2009. 2. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Annexure A/1, dated 16.02.2002 is quashed and set aside. The petitioners are also held entitled to salary of the vacation period in view of the judgment dated 1st September, 2008, rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in Baldev Singh and others versus State of H.P. and others, CWP No. 415 of 2000, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 18, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - - 3 - `