THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26861 of 2010 Dated 15th February, 2011 Between: Duddu Vijaya Sunder …Petitioner And The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its District Collector, Prakasam District and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: None appeared Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 3: AGP for Panchayat Raj The Court made the following: ORDER: At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj stated that respondent No.3 has paid the costs as directed by this Court vide order, dated 25.01.2011. There is no representation for the petitioner. In this writ petition, the petitioner sought for a mandamus to declare the action for respondent No.3 in allotting works under tender Nos.21/2010- 11 and 25/2010-11, dated 28.08.2010, as illegal and arbitrary. In the counter affidavit filed by respondent No.3, it is inter alia stated that during the tender process, on the objections raised by some of the tenderers, a letter was addressed to the Municipal Commissioner, who replied through his letter, dated 14.10.2010, stating that the petitioner has been blacklisted by the Chirala Municipality and that the said fact was suppressed by the petitioner. It is further stated that in view of the said fact, the petitioner was disqualified at technical bid stage itself and that the contract work was awarded in favour of one Sri G.Rama Krishna, who emerged as L1 during evalution of the commercial price bid. It is also averred that the said Sri Rama Krishna entered into agreement on 22.01.2010, under which, the work is scheduled to be completed within a period of six months. In view of the above noted averments contained in the counter affidavit, no relief can be granted to the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.34332 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 15th February, 2011 VGB