1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.18/2007. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.GD Kale, Adv. for applicants; Mrs.Asha Rasal, Adv. for Respondent. ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 1 st February, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) The defendants seek to get the suit transferred to the place of their residence. 3) The Counsel appearing for the original plaintiff (respondent herein) informs, the learned Judge at Newasa seized with the matter, has virtually proceeded with recording evidence of plaintiff – Principal of the institution, and he is in witness box. 4) Considering the nature of controversy, since the student/appellants herein had occasion to get education at Newasa with the said institution (plaintiff), the deficiencies in the students will have to be addressed and answered within the jurisdiction of Newasa only. Consequently, I do not see any just 2 reason, requiring transfer of the suit from Newasa to any other Court. Misc. Civil Application lacks merit, it is dismissed. No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/mca18.07