15 mca 72.10.doc 1 srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.72 OF 2010 Sau. Hemalata Suresh Pawar ... Applicant Vs. Dr.Suresh Ramchandra Pawar ... Respondent Mr. A.J.Kandarkar, advocate i/b Ms. Shubhangi S.Kadam, advocate for Applicant. Mr. Dilip Bodake, advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 6th September, 2010. P. C. 1 Heard. 2 The wife has filed this Application for transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No. 66 of 2009 from the court of the Civil Judge Senior Division at Karad to the court of the Civil Judge Senior Division at Sangli. The learned counsel for the Respondent points out that the matter is part heard, evidence of the Petitioner­husband is already recorded and matter is now for defence of the wife. Distance between two places is only 60 15 mca 72.10.doc 2 k.m. Therefore, I do not find it proper to transfer the matter at this stage. The wife can make a request to the trial court to grant her costs of litigation and transportation. If such an Application is made the trial court shall pass appropriate order. 3 Therefore, the Application stands disposed of. (J. H. BHATIA, J.)