IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.17197-M of 2010 Date of Decision:9.7.2010 Vinay Kumar .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. M.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. The present petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.61 dated 3.05.2010 registered under Sections 324,506,120- B,307,148,149 IPC at Police Station Makhu, District Ferozepur. As per the allegation in FIR, the petitioner gave a “Kapa” blow, which hit on the backside of the complainant. Main injury is attributed to the present petitioner. It has been brought to the notice of this Court and is also evident from the FIR while reading in detail before this Court, the present petitioner was part of the unlawful assembly that caused grievous injuries and some of the injuries fall under Section 307 IPC. It is further noticed that he entered into the clinic and indulged in uncontrollable violence against the complainant, who was trying to effect the compromise between the parties. Taking into account the entire totality of the facts and circumstances, particularly the conduct of the petitioner as prescribed in the FIR, concession of anticipatory bail cannot be granted to the present petitioner. Dismissed. 9.7.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE