IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8564 of 2010 RATAN SINGH @ SANTU,son of Arjun Pd.Singh, resident of village-Bangaon,P.S.-Rajoun, District-Banka. .. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR .. Opp.Party ----------- 02/ 19-04-2010 Heard Mr. Balram Kapri, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Rajoun P.S.Case No.159 of 2008 dated 15-11-2008, registered for the offence under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code and some other bailable offences under the Penal Code. According to prosecution case, accused persons are alleged to have committed theft of a vehicle belonging to the informant, but that was apprehended by the police and some accused persons were arrested there. The arrested accused persons are said to have disclosed the name of one Priyesh Kumar and this petitioner besides others. By referring to Annexure-2, it is submitted that co-accused Priyesh Kumar with almost similar allegation has been granted anticipatory bail by a Bench of this Court. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today in the above noted case, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Banka, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and subject to further conditions that: (a) one of the bailors must be a Government servant or close family members of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner and (b) the petitioner shall make regular Pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fails to make Pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. AH/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)