IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 9TH APRIL 2010 / 19TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 12874 of 2010(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- DEVASSYKUTTY.K.P., U.P.S.A., AMUP SCHOOL, EDAKKULAM.P.O., THIRUNAVAYA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.ANANDAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE MANAGER, AMUP SCHOOL, EDAKKULAM, MALAPPURAM, THIRUNAVAYA.P.O. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. T.T. MUHAMOOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 12874 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 9th day of April, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext. P5 order of the Government, whereby the petitioner's application for correction of his date of birth has been rejected. The petitioner wants the date of birth entered in his service records corrected as 28-4-1957 instead of 19-11-1956. 2. Admittedly, in the SSLC book also, the petitioner's date of birth is 19-11-1956. The petitioner has not got the same corrected. Even otherwise, the Government orders prescribe a time limit for filing applications for correction of date of birth. Admittedly, the petitioner has not filed the same within the period prescribed under the Government Orders enabling correction of date of birth. Those Government Orders specifically stipulate that no application for condonation of delay would be entertained. This is also expressly made clear in Note 3 of Rule 3 of Chapter VI of the KER. In the above circumstances, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.