IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28775 of 2009 RAM AKWAL YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 08. 02. 2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kurtha P.S. Case No. 07/09 registered under Sections 376, 511, 302, 380, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that dog squad went to the house of co-accused Ajay Singh, but he has been allowed regular bail by a Bench of this Court i.e. one of the available ground prevailing in the case for the petitioner, otherwise, none is named in the F.I.R. and the case was suspected for killing due to unsuccessful attempt by one to commit rape, but one thing is there which come in way for same relief that deceased-husband accompanied the deceased for some distance and when the husband was examined, he made statement that this petitioner along with Satyendra Yadav and Pramod Yadav were seen in the vicinity, further making conspiracy also, may not be evidence which can be based for conviction, but the same is indicating probability of accusation. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation, prayer for grant of anticipatory 2 bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. However, it would be open for the petitioner he files regular bail application in the court below and the court below shall consider its own merit. m.p. (Mandhata Singh, J.)