1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR M.C.A. No. 68/2007 in WRIT PETITION No. 4648/2005 (Decided) (State of Mah. & ors. Vs. Lal Sai Sindhi Vyapari Sangh & 46 ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : MARCH 18, 2008. Heard Mrs. Dangre, Addl. G.P. for the petitioners, Mr. Parchure for the respondent nos. 7 & 8, and Mr. Mishra for respondent no. 27. Present review petition is filed seeking review of the order dated 13/9/2005 passed by this Court whereby Writ Petition No. 4648/2005 came to be disposed of. The learned Addl. G.P. has submitted that the State Government gave assurance in Writ Petition No. 3840/2001 that the concerned shopkeepers shall be rehabilitated. It is further contended that this assurance is in respect of those who are connected with Writ Petition No. 3840/2001. 2 We have considered the contentions canvassed by the learned counsel. Perused the order dated 13/9/2005 passed in Writ Petition No. 3840/2001. In the aforesaid order, we have observed thus: “... we expect the State Government and its concerned department to take appropriate steps in this regard without any further delay as per the assurance given before this Court in Writ petition No. 3840/2001 for rehabilitating the shopkeepers. Writ petition stands disposed of with the above observation.” The above referred observations clearly demonstrate that this Court has not given any direction and expected the State Government to honour assurance given in Writ petition No. 3840/2001 by rehabilitating the shopkeepers without lapse of time. In that view of the matter, no case is made out to review the order dated 13/9/2005. M.C.A. is dismissed. In view of this order, Civil Application No. 407/2007 is also disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE RMP