THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.33635 of 2010 DT.31.12.2010 Between: B.Srinivas Reddy … Petitioner And Government of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Resu Mahender Reddy Counsel for respondents: AGP for Panchayat Raj The Court made the following ORDER: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not including the 1% towards Labour Cess on gross bill in respect of all works allotted to the petitioner and payments made after 07.06.2010 by revising the estimate as per U.O.Note No.4763/PFS.F8(A1)/98-4, Dt.28.02.2008 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article-14 & 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently directing the respondents to include 1% towards Labour Cess in all the works entrusted to the petitioner and to release the amounts which were already recovered in this regard to the petitioner.” At the hearing, the learned counsel for the parties agreed that the issue raised in this writ petition is squarely covered by final orders, dated 22.10.20009, in W.P.No.11269 of 2009 and batch, and that following the said order, W.P.No.532 of 2010, was disposed of by this Court by order, dated 21.01.2010, wherein it was held as under: “The subject matter of this writ petition is squarely covered by a common order passed by this Court in W.P.No.11269 of 2009 and batch dated 22.10.2009. Following the same, this writ petition is also disposed of directing that:- (a) the respondents shall include 1% cess in the estimates for the works which they propose to undertake, if the work continues for or beyond twelve months and involves engagement of 10 workers or more; and (b) the respondents shall not deduct any amount towards cess, unless the corresponding amount is included in the estimates.” In the light of the above, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the orders, dated 22.10.2009 in W.P.No.11269 of 2009 and batch, and dated 21.01.2010 in W.P.No.532 of 2010. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.42626 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) Date:31.12.2010 VGB