IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMM. FOR JUDGMENT NO.657 OF 2003 SUMM. FOR JUDGMENT NO.657 OF 2003 SUMM. FOR JUDGMENT NO.657 OF 2003 IN IN IN SUMM.SUIT NO.3116 OF SUMM.SUIT NO.3116 OF SUMM.SUIT NO.3116 OF 2001 2001 2001 Ms Hemal Shah ... Plff versus Mrs Geeta wd/o Mahesh Kantawala & ors..Defts Ms Neela Dholkia for Plaintiff Mr Prasad Rao for Defts CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 19th April 2005. DATED : 19th April 2005. DATED : 19th April 2005. P.C:- P.C:- P.C:- 1. Learned counsel for the parties states that facts in this case are identical with the facts in Summons for Judgment No. 645 of 2003. Hence, for reasons recorded in the order passed today in Summons for Judgment No. 645 of 2003 the defendants are granted unconditional leave to defend the suit. Suit shall stand transferred to the list of commercial causes. The defendants to file the written statement within four weeks. D.G.KARNIK, J