IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 15TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 26TH MAGHA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 1406 of 2009(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.4172/2003 Dated 08/04/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): WRIT PETITIONER ------------------------------ RAJENDRAN V., S/O.KARUNAKARAN, AGED 49, ATTENDER, (NOW WORKING AS GODOWN-IN-CHARGE), LAKSHADWEEP DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., CHALAPPURAM, KOZHIKODE - 02. BY ADV. SMT.S.KARTHIKA SRI.M.S.UNNIKRISHNAN SMT.K.P.GEETHA MANI SRI.M.R.ANISON RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. SMT.MARNYA ETE, I.A.S., FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, LAKSHADWEEP DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., BOTANICAL GARDEN, KAVARATTI. 2. SHRI.M.K.SYED ABDULLAKOYA, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, GENERAL MANAGER, LAKSHADWEEP DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., G.406, PANAMPILLI NAGAR, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 032. ADV. SRI.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,SC,LAKSHADWEEP ADMN FOR R1 & 2 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== Contempt Case (C).No. 1406 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 15th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T In view of the affidavit filed by the respondents, I am satisfied that they have substantially complied with the directions in Annexure A1 judgment. Therefore, I do not find any grounds for continuing action in the contempt case. Accordingly, this contempt case is dismissed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge