IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 19943 of 2002 Between: Sri Ramachanderjee Temple, Tenants Welfare Association, rep.by its President. T.Satyanarayana, S/o.Govindaiah, aged about 49 years, R/o.Ramachanderjee Temple, Chwraha Jinsi, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. Govt. of A.P., Revenue (Endowments-II) Dept., rep.by its Secretary, Secretariat Buildings, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. 2. Regional Joint Commissioner, M.Z.-III, Endowments Dept., Hyderabad. 3. The Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Dept., Twin Cities, Hyderabad. 4. Govind Kumar Lohiya, S/o.Damodar Das Lohiya, aged about 40 years, Jinsi Chowrah, Dhoolpet, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly a writ of Mandamus declaring the Memo No.64981/Endowments 11 (1)/2000, dt.29-8-2002 as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violates principles of natural justice and set-aside the same, consequently direct the respondent 1 to 3 take management of Ramachanderjee Temple at Jinsi Chowrah, Dhoolpet, Hyderabad and pass any order or orders in the interest of the Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.ASHOK KUMAR NEELI Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3: G.P. FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent No.4.: MR.KALYAN RAO JOSHI The Court made the following : ORDER: When this writ petition came up for hearing on 11-06- 2009, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and therefore, it was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on this day, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No costs. ___________________________ B. SESHASAYANA REDDY, J Date : 3rd July, 2009. AMD