IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 18TH DECEMBER 2009 / 27TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 RP.No. 1117 of 2009() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.33733/2008 dated 28.10.2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER/3RD RESPONDENT IN THE WPC. ----------------------------------------------------------- T.H.AYOOB, KAREPADATH HOUSE,PURAYUR,DESOM P.O.,ALUVA. BY ADV. MR.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER IN THE WPC. ------------------------------------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,ERNAKULAM. 2. SRI.V.P.KUNJUMON, VETTUKUZHIYIL HOUSE,WEST KADUNGALLUR,ALUVA. 3. ABDUL HAKKIM,S/O.LATE SAIDUMUHAMMED, PARAYALIL HOUSE,THOTTAKKATTUKARAM,ALUVA. 4. D.PRADEEP,S/O.DIVAKAAN PILLAI, JAYASADAN,EAST KADUNGALLUR, U.C.COLLEGE P.O.,ALUVA. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR ADVS. MR. P. DEEPAK MR. JITHESH MENON THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J ................................................ R.P. No. 1117 of 2009 ................................................. Dated this the 18th day of December, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed this R.P. seeking review of the judgment dated 28.10.2009 in W.P.(C) No. 33733 of 2008. The ground for seeking review is that certain contention of the petitioner in the review petition, which has been taken in his counter affidavit in the writ petition have not been properly considered by this court while passing the judgment sought to be reviewed. I am of opinion that that is not a ground for review of a judgment. If the petitioner is aggrieved by any finding in respect thereof, his remedy lies in filing an appeal against the judgment. Accordingly the review petition is dismissed. sd/- S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE rhs // True copy // PA to Judge