BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR(C.G.) IN THE MATTER OF W.P.SN0. §S;'?G /2008 PETITIONER SANTOSH KUMAR ASATI S/O LATE SHRI GAYA PRASAD ASATI, AGE-46 YEARS, SUB—ENGINEER P.M.G.S.Y. DIVISION N0. 3 BAGICHA, DISTT. JASHPUR (C.G. VERSUS 1.UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF PERSONAL PUBLIC GRIEVANCES, AND PENSIONS, 310,LOKNAYAK BHAWAN, NEW DELHI.- 110 003 (2.DIRECT0R, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONAL GRIEVANCES, AND PENSIONS, LOKNAYAK BHAWAN KHAN MARKET, NEW DELHI. -1 10 003 (7 3. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF CHHATTISGARH, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, (STATE REORGANIZATION CELL), D.K.s. BHAWAN MANTRALAYA, RAIPUR (CG) 4.STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,T0 THE GOVT. OE MADHYA PRADESH, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, (STATE REORGANIZATION CELL), MANTRALAYA, BHOPAL (M.P.). RESPONDENTS A %¢_, M rm (Sk {L 5. . STATE OP CHHATTISGARH THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OP PANCHAYAT & GRAMIN VIKAS. DKS MANTRALAYA BHAVAN, GE. ROAD, RAIPUR (CG) 6.THE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT & GRAMIN VIKAS VIBHAG, RAIPUR (C.G) EECEIVEn-cow Relwlébé harmila Singhal. chor General of India f Chgattisgarh High C‘Qm‘to _ (I I @ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF \ INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT/ORDER OR DIRECTION AS DEEMED FIT GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR HI N SINQLE BENCH : ’BL HONE SHRI MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA J Writ Petition IS! No. 552012008 PETITIONER Santosh Kumar Asati Versus RESPONDENTS Union of Endia 8a others Petition under Article 226i227 of the Constitution of India Aggeaxanc : Shn' Pradeep Saksena, counsel for the petitioner. 1 65 V 2. Smt. Fouzia Mirza, Asst. Solicitor Gcneral of India] respondents No. C.G./resp9ndents No. 3, 5 65 6. y. Advocate General for the ' State of Shn' v.v.s Mmhy, D respondent No.4/ Siaie of MP. ORAL-ORDER (Passed on 5.8.20 10) Heard. On 17.8.2009, u'me was granted to respondents to me reply. On 6. 11.2009, last opportunity of tiling reply was granted to respondents. Thereafter, on 2. 12.2009, as last opportunity, further 3 weeks time was No. 3, 5 85 6,’State of C.G. have filed their return, other respondents have not filed their return. 4. Learned Asst. Solicitor General, upon instructions, submits that the allocation of the petitioner is under consideration since December, 2007, but could not be finalized for want of informationjservice particulars of the petitioner from his administrative department. Madhya Pradesh Government sent a letter dated 26.8.2009 stating that the relevant records of service are with the State of Chhattisgarh and letter has been sent to them for making available necessary records. 5. Learned counsel for respondents No. 3, 5 85 6/State of C.G. refers to letter dated 28.8.2009 (Annexure R-l) to submit that the certified copy of the order of appointment and service book of the petitioner has been sent to, the Chief Engineer, Rural Engineering Services, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal, Vide aforesaid memo dated 28.8.2009 (Annexure R— 1). Learned counsel for respondent No.4/State of M.P. submits that i till date, he has not received instructions. 6. In View of the submission made by learned Asst. Solicitor General ,of India] respondents No. 1 & 2 and Dy. Advocate General for the State of C.G./respondents No.3, 5 & 6 and taking into consideration the fact that the matter relating to allocation of the petitioner is not being nnalized forwant of relevant records to be made available nom the State of Chhattisgarh 8r. State of Madhya Pradesh, to the Union of India, it would be proper to direct respondents — State of Chhattisgarh as well as Madhya Pradesh to make available relevant records of the petitioner to respondents No. 1 & 2f Union of India, within a period of 2 months fmm the date of receipt of copy of this order. Rcspondmxts No. 1 & 2/Union of India shall take final giecision with regard to the petitioner’s case of allocation within another 3 months &0m the date of receipt of the relevant service records of the petitioner. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands finally disposed off. 9. Consequently, I.A.No.3 also stands disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava E Judge if