1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9606 OF 2010 (Yogesh Atmaram Bhoge Vs. The Executive Officer, National Rural Health Mission) ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Heard Mr. Amol S. Savant, learned counsel for the petitioner. I find that there is concurrent findings, recorded by the courts below, coming to the conclusion that there is no relationship between the petitioner and the respondent establishment as employee and employer. That apart, it is not in dispute that the petitioner was appointed on contractual basis for 11 months. I do not see any reason to interfere in the concurrent findings recorded by the courts below. Hence, writ petition has no merit and the same is accordingly dismissed. Needless to mention that the amount, if any, is due towards the respondent to be paid to the petitioner, the respondents shall pay the said amount to the petitioner at the earliest. (S. S. SHINDE. J.) Date:19.11.2010. rlj/