IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 16485 of 2008 alongwith CWP(T) Nos. 16486 to 16488, 16491 to 16496 and 16584 of 2008. Date of Decision : June 14, 2011 1. CWP(T) No. 16485 of 2008 Dal Bahadur versus State of H.P. and others. 2. CWP(T) No. 16486 of 2008 Meena versus State of H.P. and others. 3. CWP(T) No. 16487 of 2008 Nirpu versus State of H.P. and others. 4. CWP(T) No. 16488 of 2008 Bhagat Bahadur versus State of H.P. and others. 5. CWP(T) No. 16491 of 2008 Saili versus State of H.P. and others. 6. CWP(T) No. 16492 of 2008 Thuli versus State of H.P. and others. 7. CWP(T) No. 16493 of 2008 Nima Sherpin versus State of H.P. and others. 8. CWP(T) No. 16494 of 2008 Gore versus State of H.P. and others. 9. CWP(T) No. 16495 of 2008 Dolma versus State of H.P. and others. 10. CWP(T) No. 16496 of 2008 Ashok Kumar versus State of H.P. and others. 11. CWP(T) No. 16584 of 2008 Bibi Maya versus State of H.P. and others. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner(s): Mr. Abhyendra Gupta, Advocate, vice Mr. A. K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). For the respondents: Mr. R. K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) All these writ petitions are filed with identical prayers and one set of such prayers reads as follows: 2 “ That the respondents may be ordered to grant the work charged status to the applicant with effect from the due date with all the benefits incidental thereof such as full back arrears of pay and seniority etc. and pay fixation.” 2. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered by judgment of this Court, dated 27.7.2009, passed in CWP No.1594 of 2008, titled Man Singh versus State of H.P. and Ors. Petitioners submit that they would file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for them to do so. Therefore, there will be a direction to the respondents to take appropriate action in the matter in the light of the judgment, referred to above, in case the petitioners are also similarly situated, within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. 3. With these observations, the writ petitions stand disposed of , so also the pending application(s) if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. June 14, 2011 (PK/C)