IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2199 of 2002 AKHIL BHARATIYA PRATHAMIK SHIK Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For petitioner :- None For State:- SC-1. --------- 3/ 20.11.2008 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. The order-sheet shows that on 11.2.2002 also nobody had appeared leading to dismissal of the case for default but the same was restored on application. Learned counsel for the State has pointed out that petitioner has claimed to be Anchal Sachiv of Pokhraira Anchal, Dist- Muzaffarpur of a union or association of primary teachers and has also filed this writ petition against policy decision of the State as contained in Annexure-1 issued by District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur on 27.12.2001. It has further been highlighted that the said policy decision is in accordance with policy of the State Government contained in Annexure-2 whereby different duties and powers have been given to different authorities of three tier Panchayati Raj System Authorities. - 2 - It has further been submitted that there is no case made out for challenging policy decision of the State Government. Since nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner and considering that the matter was earlier also dismissed for default, the writ petition is dismissed. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh,J.)