HIGH COVKT OF CHHAmSGARH : BILASPUR WritPetition (Q No, 7623 of 2007 Petitioners 1. 2. 3. 4. Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5, 6. Narsiugh Yadu, S/o Bishal, aged about 35 years, r/o village Indavani, Tehsil & District Rajnandgaon, C.G. PuTshottani Sahu, s/o Maharaji Raru Sahu, aged about 38 years, r/o Vill^e Indavani, Tehsil & District Rajnandgaon, C.G. Gharvasi Ram Sahu, S/o (late) Phool Si&gh, aged about 60 years, r/o ViUage Indavani, Tehsil & District Rajnaadgaon, C.G. Deherlal Saliu, s/o (late) Bahoranlal Sahu, aged about 36 years, r/o Village Indavaai, Tehsil & Distdct Rajnaadgaon, C.G. State of Chliattisgarh, through Secretary, Departaient of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhavau, Raipur, C.G. State of Chhatdsgarh, through Secretary, Department of Industiy, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipiir, C.G. Chliattisgarh Industrial Developiaent Corporation, fhrough its Managing Director, Shastri Chowk, Raipur, C.G, General Manager, District industry & Tradc Centre, Rajnandgaon, C.G. Laad Acquisition Officer/Sub Divisional Of&cer, Tehsil & District Rajnaadgaon, C.G. CoUector, District Rajnandgaon, C.G. (Writ Petition under Article 226 offhe Constitution ofludia) (SB: HonTile Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Ms Sudtia BIiardwaj, Advocate for fhe petitioners. Shri Alok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate for fhe respondente No, 1, 2, 5 &6. Shri Ayaj Naved, Advocate for the respondeut No. 3. O RD E R (orall (Passed on fhis 13ih day ofJuly, 2009) Heard. 1. The petitioner has filed this petition against the notification dated 1.9.2007 (Aaiiexure P/8), issued under Section 6 of the Laad Acquisition Act, 1894 for acquirmg laud ofviUage Indavani, Patwari Halka No. 26. :,i^€ 2. 3. 4. Thalair Leamed coiuisel appeariiig for the respondeuts produced a copy of the letter dated 13th August, 2008, of Special Secrctary, Govera-ment of Chhattisgarh, Conunerce aad Industries Department, addressed to fh.e Managmg Director, Chhattisgarh State Industrial Developm.ent Corporation and fhe order dated 4.9.2008, issued by the CoUector, de-notifying fhe petition scheduled land. The docuinents are taken on iccord. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners submits fhat in view of fhe above-stated letter aad the order, de-notifyiag fhe petition scheduled laad, nottung survives iu. this wri.t petition for adjudication. The petltion is accordingly dismissed as haviug become iafi-uctuous. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge -l