W[e QMW fé kh HM) 1W3 Z9? WMQ {E .“ m%gg@2 é . ‘ x j 3¥>WW v WWW Mmm‘mmm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPU EIRST APPEAL No. W7 3’ OF 2008 Wéb wimpm g Qv€§m¥¢ APPELLANT [Defendanf No.1] Naveen Kumar Singh, son of Lm‘e Arjun Singh, aged abou’r 45 year's, Occupa’rion-Vaidh “Bhism Cancer Chikifsalay”, residenf of Nearw» Mahadeo Ghaf, Tehsil & Disfricf Raipur‘. Vs RESPONDENTS (Plainfiff) 1. Durga Singh, son of Late Arjun Singh, aged uboM 36 years, OccupafiomVaidh, residenf of Noyapar‘o, Tehsil & Disfric‘r Raipur. Defendan‘r No.2 & 3 2. Smf‘ Vijya Konal, wife of Vijay Kumar Konal (V.D. Konal), dough‘rer‘ of Late Arjun Singh, oged about 51 years, Occupa‘rion-House Wife, residenf of 5aim‘ Gadge, Bholegaon,‘DisH Waasim (M5). 3. Smf. Chhaya Kanal, wife of Shri Komol Kanol, daughfer‘ of Lafe Arjun Singh, aged abouf 48 years, Occupafion-House Wife, resident of Loxmi Nagar, Nagpur (MS) fhr‘ough K.D. Kanol, 5-2, ‘Ashfa Vinoyok Residency, Renuka Vihar, Shofabdi Nogor, Porva’ri Nagar, Nagpur-27. R Civil sui? valued at @ 19,: $6.000!“ Court faa affixed Rs.2000/— This appeal is also valued a? “:wpoor & court fee affixed Rs.Z,OOO/— PPEAL UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL L/ PROCEDURE! 1908 igilj HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA. No. 177/2008 RN ORAL ORDER (3~2-2011) Case is called twice. Even then non appellant. e appears for the In the circumstances, this Court 1's left to dismiss the appeal. with no option but Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non—prosecution. Sci/- N.K. Agrawal Judge h. APPELLANT Naveen Kumar Singh Versus M RESPONDENTS Durga Singh and others SB:- HON’BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL J