THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.3286 of 2010 Dated: 13th April, 2010 Between: Md.Ghouse and another …Petitioners AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented By its Public Prosecutor and two others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.3286 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioners are the accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.45 of 2010 of Narsapur Police Station, Medak District relating to offence punishable under Section 324/34 I.P.C. At the instance of the first petitioner, when his son sustained a grievous injury, Narsapur police registered a case in Crime No.44 of 2010 on 26.03.2010 for offence punishable under Section 325/34 I.P.C. against the second respondent and others. It is contended by the petitioners’ counsel that the third respondent who is Inspector of Police, Narsapur circle, pressurized the first petitioner to compromise the dispute with the second respondent and that for that purpose, though the first petitioner gave report on 21.03.2010 to the police, case was registered on 26.03.2010 and that as the first petitioner refused to compromise with the second respondent, the Inspector of Police himself got Crime No.45 of 2010 registered against the petitioners as a counterblast for Crime No.44 of 2010. It is not grievance of the petitioners that the police did not take proper action on report given by the first petitioner. The police booked Crime No.44 of 2010 on report given by the 1st petitioner for offence under Section 325/34 I.P.C. properly because the 1st petitioner’s son sustained fracture of elbow. The question whether Crime No.45 of 2010 is a counterblast, is one of fact. Truth or otherwise of contents of report in Crime No.45 of 2010, is also again a question of fact. These questions cannot be gone into in a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. It is for the police to investigate into both the Crimes and to come to a dispassionate conclusion. This court does not find any reason to intercept investigation at the threshold. Hence the petition is dismissed. __________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J April 13, 2010 lmv