IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7105 of 2009 1. SAMSAD @ MD. NIZAM 2. Rustam Khatoon @ Rustam 3. Md. Mustaque Alam 4. Maimun Khatoon 5. Md. Guddu Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ For the Peitioners : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad. Mr. B.K. Sinha & Mr. Manoj Kumar. For the State : Mr. Yogesh Kumar. ----- 3/ 30.06.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners have been alleged for kidnapping informant’s daughter for ransom. Demand of ransom is doubted on the financial condition of the family, as the informant was a helpless widow. There is difference of victim husband’s name. According to the informant, she was wife of Niraj Chauhan, while in her statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C., she is naming one Karan Mallik as her husband. However, her husband was behind the bar earlier to the date of the incident. Further according to the learned counsel, paragraph-54 belies the allegation doubting character of the victim and all the family members. Moreover, she succeeded to come back without any help. In those circumstances, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Jalalgarh P.S. Case No. 9 of 2008, above named 2 petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Purnea subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)