IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO : 8553 of 2005 Between: S.Vasudeva Rao, S/o. Late Ranga Rao, Bhongir, Nalgonda District H.No.3-6-394, Flat No.206, Street . No.3, Adjacent to Koratla Apts., Himayatnagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Govt. of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt., Revenue (Vig.II) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, . Hyderabad. 2. The State of A.P., rep. by its Special Chief Secretary and Chief . Commissioner of Land Administration, Station Road, . . . Nampally, Hyderabad. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to regularise the suspension period from 15-06-1998 to 26-10- 2000, settle the national promotion as Deputy Collector and thereafter fix and pay the pensionary benefits taking into consideration G.O.Rt.No.1719 dt. 23.10.2004 wherein it is decided that there are no disciplinary proceedings pending against the petitioner and decided to drop further action by declaring the rejection of interim orders and issuing notice before admission in O.A.No.6587 of 2004 by the A.P.Administrative Tribunal. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.R.SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents .: GP FOR REVENUE The Court at the admission stage made the following : ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice G.Bikshapathy) This writ petition is filed by the petitioner assailing the interim order 8-12-2004 in O.A.No.6587 of 2004 on the file of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad. 2. The petitioner is the applicant before the Tribunal. He filed the O.A. before the Tribunal to direct the 1st respondent to regularize the suspension period of the applicant and effect the notional promotion and other consequential benefits, by implementing the G.O.Rt No.1719 REV. (Vig-II_ Department dated 23-10-2004. The Tribunal refused to grant interim direction, instead issued notice before admission. Assailing the said order, the present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner. 3. After hearing the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, we are not inclined to go into the merits of the case, inasmuch as it is suffice to direct the Tribunal to dispose of the O.A.No. 6587 of 2004 as expeditiously as possible within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. Accordingly, Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ____________________ G.Bikshapathy, J. ________________ P.S.Narayana, J. 26th April, 2005. KM ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Principal Secretary to Govt., Govt. of A.P., Revenue (Vig.II) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, . Hyderabad. 2. The Special Chief Secretary and Chief Commissioner of Land . Administration, State of A.P., Station Road, Nampally, . . . Hyderabad. 3. 2 CCs to G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad, (OUT) 4. 2 CD copies 5. The Registrar, A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad. THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO : 8553 of 2005 26th April, 2005