IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39890 of 2008 PREM KUMAR MAHTO, S/o Paras Mahto, R/o Village – Shiv Dah, P.S. Tarwara, Distt. – Saran. Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 27.11.2008. Heard. The petitioner is the husband of the complainant, who has gone to Delhi for being settled leaving his wife in lurch. The Court cannot use any discretion in favour of such a person, who treats his wife as a tangible commodity. The application is accordingly rejected. If an application is filed for grant of regular bail, the same may be decided at an early date. dk ( Barin Ghosh, J. )