THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR WRIT PETITION No.21660 of 2011 Dated:02.08.2011 Between: The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Prl.Secretary, WD & CW Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, And others. … Petition And T.Anitha, And another. ... Responde THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR WRIT PETITION No.21660 of 2011 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) The writ petition is against an interim order dated 29.06.2010 O.A.No.3787 of 2010 directing the third petitioner herein to contact the E Hospital and verify whether the certificate produced by the first responden genuine or not and if it is genuine, to act upon it by considering the case of applicant for appointment to the post of Multi Purpose Health Assistant (F)/ Technicians (MPHA). The first respondent herein is an unemployee. Statedly, she is physic challenged person with hearing impairment. She obtained a physical disab certificate from the District Medical Board, Kadapa, on 24.06.2008. 17.02.2009 the second petitioner, who is the Chairman of the Selec Committee for Disabled Persons, called for applications to fill up the back vacancies in MPHAs reserved for the disabled. The first respondent appli On verification, doubting the physical disability certificate the first respond was referred to Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Kada who confirmed her disability to the extent of 58%. Further, the first respond was referred to the State Medical Board of ENT General Hospital, K Hyderabad. Allegedly, they gave a certificate on 23.05.2010. Even this w doubted and the petitioners did not take any action. Therefore, the respondent filed the Original Application, being O.A.No.3787 of 2010, pray the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, inter alia, to declare that sh entitled for appointment to the existing vacancies and for a further declara that the non-consideration of physical disabled (hearing) persons based on certificate issued by RIMS and ENT Hospital is arbitrary and illegal. It appears, the application filed by the first respondent was listed al with another application, being O.A.No.3737 of 2010, filed by V.Chennakesavamma. Learned Tribunal while ordering notice to petitione and 3 herein (respondents before the Tribunal) passed the order as noti hereinabove. Learned Government Pleader relies on a communication da 11.07.2011 from the Superintendent of Government ENT Hospital, Hyderab to the second petitioner herein which is to the effect that candidates are eligible for appointment of Government job unless the hearing disability leve 85 dBHL on the audiogram and that the first respondent Chennakesavamma have 60 dBHL in both ears. According to hearing disab chart, the percentage of disability is 53%. According to the Governm Pleader, the first respondent is not qualified or eligible for being appointe the post of MPHA as a physically challenged person and therefore impugned order is vitiated by error. Counsel for the first respondent Sri P.V.Ramana submits that against common order which is impugned herein the petitioners already filed a petition, being W.P (SR).No.105996 of 2011, against the order in O.A.No.3 of 2010, filed by Chennakesavamma, and that a Division Bench of this C consisting one of us (Justice K.G.Shankar) has already dismissed the sam This fact is not seriously disputed. Furthermore, the Tribunal while orde notice, passed order and it is always open to the petitioners to move Tribunal to vacate the interim order or make a request for expediting application. This writ petition is wholly misconceived. We do not find any e in the impugned order. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in limine. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO ________________ (K.G.SHANKAR 02.08.2011 vs