IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14693 of 2010 SURYAMANTI DEVI W/O SRI RAJESH PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 07.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the petitioner was the tenant of the house where dead body of one Chhotu Ramwas recovered in a burnt condition. During investigation it transpired that the petitioner used to pressurized the deceased to sell the property in question, to her and since he refused, therefore, the petitioner in conspiracy with others had committed murder. However, considering that apart from suspicion there is no cogent material against the petitioner who is a lady and is in custody since 7.12.2009, let her (Suryamanti Devi),be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each - 2 - to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M, Danapur, in connection with Khagaul P.S. case no. 113/2008, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays and trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )