IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 17TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 26TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 29029 of 2008(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- VASANTHAKUMARI, AGED 56 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF PADMAKSHI RESIDING AT NISHUS AZHAMKULAM, THOZHICHAL WARD, VIZHINJAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, VENGANOOR VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.L.NARASIMHAN SRI.A.MOHAMMED FAIZAL SRI.N.KRISHNA PRASAD RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SECRETARY,SPECIAL GRADE PANCHAYATH, VIZHINJAM, 2. VIZHINJAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.SREEDHARAN NAIR FOR R1 & 2 SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR FOR R1 & 2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No. 29029 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 17th day of November, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P8 order, whereby proceedings have been initiated against the petitioner for constructing a boundary wall by the side of an alleged road. According to the petitioner, there is no road, since the petitioner had donated the land comprised of the alleged road for the purpose of constructing a road which has not yet been taken over by the Panchayat. According to the petitioner, in order to separate the land the petitioner has gifted for the road, the petitioner has constructed a boundary wall. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Panchayat submits that the construction offends CRZ Regulations. 2. I am not inclined to go into the merits of the rival contentions in so far as Ext.P13 appeal filed by the petitioner is pending before the Panchayat. 3. After hearing the counsel for the petitioner as also the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P13 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, w.p.c.29029/08 2 within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge