J> WMT PETITION (S) No. 1835 of2007 Smt. Sita Uke Age about 57 year, Asstt. Teacher W/o Sfari M.L.Uke Subhash Ward Kanker Block. - Kanker, Distt. -Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. Sta Through Secretary, Educational Tribal Department D.K.S. Distt. -Raipur (C.G.) n. icer J'<ani District-Kanker(C.G.' 3. BIock Education Officer District-Kanker (C.G.) Present: Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Miss Deepali Pandey, Panel Lawyer for fhe State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on 29fll Mareh 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for th State/respondents jointly submit that tfae fact and question of la\ involved in the present writ petitioa are the same to that of i: i Vs. M >»n-g and another ?2006 (ID MPJR-CG 96L which has bee disoosed of vide order dated 03.04,2006. Leamed couns< appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mumcipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired S.T.I. Examination Certificate on her own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and farther whefher she has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sui^iash Sd/- Satish K. AgnUiotri Judge