...--"^^" ^y^^ {'L^' ,. INTHEH!GR COTJRT^FJUDLCATURE AT 3ILASPUR ^'.^•- CHHATTISGARH W.P. (S) N0. /2006 PETITIONER R.C. Upadhyay S/o. R.N. Upadhyay,- Aged about 45 years, R/o. Bade Kilepal, Tahsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG) \7ERSUS RESPONDENTS 1] State of Chhatdsgarh, ; Through: Secretary, Tribal Welfare Departnient, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipui', DistrictRaipur(CG) 21 '3"! ->J Commissioner,, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) Asst. Conimissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG) ^Svs:^^ 4] Collector, Jagdalpur,. Disti-ict Bastar (CG) WRTTPETmON^lINDER aRTK'LE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF JNDIA XI-HC-78 3^-qWRTq', ESTfltf'lia, Rlc'liuy HI*1WI St><11<*» XI-HC-78 *11*1W( ai^Tcb 'ssi '^Wv\^, tiixflyis, Riniyy J^K ' • ^- •T?:.^^/- •^ 200^ an^TTg^ (yit^ct^) f^TRi awsn^Tsbii'sb ->v. ??aTwgfer3Ti^r 10-8-2006 Mr. ManoJ Pararvpe, counsel f4r Mrs. Aryu Ahuja, Deputy 6ovt] advance copy. Heard both the counsel. By the instant writ petition uf(der of India, the petitioner hos challengejd (Annexure P-2) passed by responder^- transferred from Higher Secondary^ Hi9her Secondary School, Benur. Learned counsel for the petiti^ner transferred showing that he has bee»^ whereas, no such request was niade transferred on a wron9 ground. He allowed to make a representotion to appearing for the State/respondents| Having heard leapned counsel and circumstances of the case and wt the case, the request made by learn^d and reasonable. Thereforo, the p{ fepresentation r-aisin9 all his gr'ievan4es respondent No.l within ten days fronj decide the representation within one| considering the points raised by the qwrfcTsfl^WI^'fffc^(^^ff ^srf^lTWI^T r the petltioner. Advoccte for the State/respondents, on Article 226/227 of the Constitution his transfer order doted 7th July, 2006 No.4, whereby the petitioner has been School, Bade Kilepal, bistrict: Bastar to submits that the petitioner has been transferred on his own request and cost, l|>y the petitioner, therefore, he has been fprther submits that the petitioner may be ('espondent No.l to which learned counsel has no objection. for the partjes, having regard to the facts fthout expressing any opjnion on merit of counset for the petitioner is just, foir ititioner is allowed to make a detailed annexing a eopy of the writ petition to todoy and respondent No.l is directed to month from the date of its receipt after petitioner, in an objective manner, on its P.T.O. •-y 78 ^St ^WM<i, ^SnS\wiG, Rcfltfy Hmwi axiicb W^ 200 3Tlii?TMa<»i (t':<t3siSET) sti^r^iTf^ira? cwr sn^?r shHlqi Soma CTtITWdfltT-m^T own merits, in accordance with law. decided, the jmpiyned order dated the petitioner shall remain stayed. With the directions aforesaici. Consequentiy, M.(W.)P.No.31-|(5/2006 disposed of. Par-ties are entitled for certi'(ied copy of 1+iis order. fnil the representation of the petitioner 'is 7^*' July, 2006 (Annexure P-2), in respect of , the peti+ion stands disposed of. <S I.-4.N0.7562/2006 also stand +l<llrl'i|1-l H11c)]'¥te^<f5l^K ^sri^tiTsn^r L-C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O. \^