IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 6759 of 2005 Between: B.Sunitha Naren W/o. BG Barendra Babu, H.No.17-127/160, Srinivas Nilayam, Sri Raghavendra Nagar, Uppal, Hyderabad-500 039. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Vice Chariman Cum Manaing Director, Andhra Pradesh Housing Board, Gruhakalpa, Hyderabad- 500 001. 2 The Principal Secretary to Govt, Department of Housing, Govt., of A.P., Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad -29. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to declare the condition no.1 to 3 namely,1) A lease cum sale agreement is to be executed by you. As per existing procedure of registration dept, you have to pay 5 % of the cost of the ﬂat towards registration of the lease agreement to the registration department. 2) Car parking will be allotted in the third week of March 2005 to those applicants who have paid Rs.40,000/- and Rs 15,000/- towards covered and uncovered parking. 3) The advance deposit amount towards 'maintenance fund' had to be deposited in the following order, (a) Rs.10,000/- in case of MIG allottee and b) Rs.15,000/- in case of HIG allottee. In addition to the above allottee had to pay monthly maintenance charges as per the actual w.e.f 1-4-2005. as contained in the letter no.5827/HIG-4/90%/A6/Ph- III/EE/(C)03 dt.01.03.2005 as null and void, and consequentially register the sale deed in respect of the ﬂat bearing no.HIG-AB2/403 of the Singapore class township situated at Pocharam village, Ghatkesar Mandal, R.R.District alongwith the undivided share in the land, in the interest of justice; and pass such other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.GOVIND REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR HOUSING The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 6759 of 2005 ORDER: Sri M.Venkatramana, learned counsel, representing Sri Govind Reddy Mandadi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 24.09.2007 GJ