Lo f Wq ym ‘mw—w... y .“w ‘‘ii‘-h" ‘HE HQN'i—J‘LE Md". XQJi¥ill€ItiTBL¥5TIVJ£ TRIBUNAL: J 41. B it L P U R (LA Nb @ /93 méké‘kxQ gum“ Ramji Chouhan, S/o Shri Sugutram, Aged Canstable— #3 yrs lib. ‘,‘By 321 Gecup ((iigmfLwed) Juan Felice R/0 Police Linas, gaigurg APKLISmT: D V/s ’1. The State of M..P., DZoettg throum of the Home(?olic§3, Secre't’ar‘ Vallabh Bhawaia, Bhopal 9: The Directar General of ?Qlice, Govt. of I’LPo, Palice Head. Qurter,Bhopal. The Deputy Inspe ct or Gene ral 3e 0f Police, Raipur Range, Raipur, lb, The $uprintendent 0f Police,Raipur. JxpPLicgl ampéwgg‘siacm ON 19 OF OF THE mmlmmwrm “‘mwlqgm ACT, 4985- BiOii I‘ E§SPONDENTS:’ M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition 1S! No. 91 1 of2005 Petiu'oner Ramji Chouhan Versus Raspondents State of M. P. (now Chhattisgarh) 6n others (Application U/s 19 of the Administrative mbun'als Act, 1985) (SB: Hon’me Shn' Sau‘sh K. Agnihom' J.) None for the peu'tionar. Ms Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the mspondents/ State. ORDERforall '( Passed on this 14th day of September, 2009) Sd/- I Satish K. Agnihotri § "7 Judge ' V’l'haku% A