IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 2ND JULY 2010 / 11TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 20665 of 2010(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SMT.SUJA MARY THOMAS L.P.S.A. ST, ST.MARY'S U.P.SCHOOL AYARKUNNAM,KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.M.ALIAS SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE CORPORATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCY OF SCHOOLS ARCHEPARCHY OF KOTTAYAM CHAITHANYA PASTROL CENTRE, THELLAKAM, KOTTAYAM REP BY ITS SECRETARY 686 016 2. THE SECRETARY THE CORPORATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCY OF SCHOOLS ARCHEPARCHY OF KOTTAYAM CHAITHANYA PASTROL CENTRE, THELLAKAM, KOTTAYAM -686 016 3. TH E DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KANNUR 670 003 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCTIONAL OFFICER KANGHANGAD 671 315. 5. SMT. ROSMY KUTTY C PUNNOOS HSA (PS) SACRED HEART HIGH SCHOOL PAYYANNUR, KANNUR 670 307. 6. STEPHEN THOMAS HSA (PS) SARED HEART HIGH SCHOOL, PAYYANNUR KANNUR 670 307 7. SMT. SHILU ABRAHAM HSSA (PS) HOLY FAMILY HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, RAJAPURAM, KANGHANGAD 671 315. R3 & R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. DILIP MOHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. ------------------------------------- WP (C) No. 20665 of 2010 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T ........................... The petitioner was appointed as HSA (Physical Science) under the first respondent's School. Prior to the same she was appointed as a U.P.S.A. She is presently working as L.P.S.A in St. Mary's UP School, Ayarkunnam. The said appointments of the petitioner were duly approved by the competent Educational authorities. On account of such approval of the appointment and the approval as H.S.A(Physical Science) the petitioner became a 51 A claimant, it is submitted. The grievance of the petitioner is that when vacancies arose in the category of H.S.A(Physical Science) in another School under the same Educational Agency the claim of the petitioner in Rule 51 A of Chapter XIV A was ignored and 2 WP (C) No. 20665 of 2010 respondents 5 to 7 were appointed against such vacancies. 2. Aggrieved by the non consideration of her claim under Rule 51 A and against the appointment/proposed appointment of respondent Nos.5 and 6 respectively, Exhibit P6 representation was submitted before the 3rd respondent and against the appointment of the 7th respondent, she has submitted Exhibit P7 representation before the 4th respondent. Despite the receipt of Exhibits P6 and P7 representation no actions have so far been taken by the respondents 3 and 4. It is in the circumstance, this writ petition has been filed. 3. Obviously, the petitioner has raised grievances against the non recognition of her claim under Rule 51 A of Chapter XIV A and also against the appointments of 3 WP (C) No. 20665 of 2010 Respondents 5 to 7 against the vacancies occurred subsequently. Exhibit P6 and P7 are pending before the respondents 3 and 4 respectively. 4. In this circumstances, there will be a direction to the 3rd and 4th respondents to consider and pass orders on Exhibits P6 and P7 respectively, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months, from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment with notice to the petitioner and respondents 5 to 7. Any appointment of the respondents 5 to 7 shall be subject to such orders passed on Exhibits P6 and P7. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE. rkc