- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT No. 166 OF 1999 Dena Bank ... Plaintiff Vs. Texchem Ind. P. LTD. & Anr. ... Defendants Mr. P. N. Singh i/b M/s. Vyas & Bhalwal, for the Plaintiff. None for Defendants. CORAM : S. J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : JULY 22, 2009. PC :- 1. This is a usual bank suit to recover a sum of Rs.7,31,111/- together with interest at the rate of 19.75 per cent per annum. 2. On the request of the defendants, the plaintiff granted it temporary over-draft facility upto limit of Rs.5,00,000/-. In respect thereof, defendants executed a demand promissory note and a letter of continuity. 3. In respect of the said facility, the plaintiff has maintained an account of the defendants. A compilation of documents is tendered by the plaintiff. The same is taken on record and marked “A” (Colly). 4. There is no written-statement. The documents on record clearly establish the plaintiff’s case. There is nothing on record which militates against it. Moreover, in the facts of this case, I see no reason to refuse to accept the averments made in the plaint as correct. 5. In the circumstances, the suit is decreed as prayed.