IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.267 of 2008 MD.CHHOTE, S/o late Abdul Mazid, R/o Vill. Kapiya Hatta, P.S. Goreya Kothi, Dist. Siwan Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Bibi Ajam Tara, W/o Md. Chhote 3. Miraj Ali, S/o Md. Chhote 4. Mobina Khatoon, D/o Md. Chhote. 5. Mofida Khatoon, D/o Md. Chhote. ----------- 4/ 27.07.2009 Heard both the parties. Amount of compensation awarded in favour of the wife and her children is said to be excessive. Observation of the Court is about non-availability of documentary evidence on the record. Admitted fact in the case is that petitioner is a driver though he has been said to be land owner also. For that, only documentary evidence was possible. As about him, being a private driver, no document is possible and there is elaborate discussion on the point of petitioner’s earning. All the three children are living with his wife. Rs. 600/- is awarded towards maintenance of the wife and Rs. 200/- each to the three children per month passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court. No lesser amount than that is justified. Thus, I find no illegality committed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Siwan to interfere on the point of amount of the maintenance. Accordingly, the revision application is dismissed. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)