1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2211 OF 2006 Krantikarai Suraksha Rakshak Sanghatana Petitioner vs. Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay & Thane District & ors. Respondents Ms.Jane Cox for the petitioner. Ms.Lata Desai for the respondent no.1. Mr.V.Joglekar i/b.M/s.Little & Co. for the respondent no.2. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED : 25th August, 2006 P.C. The petitioner has approached this Court in the matter of chargesheets issued to some of their members. These are based on complaints made by the employers. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that apart from present petition the petitioner had approached this Court by way of writ petition bearing No.3113/2004. It was disposed of on 8th February, 2005. The contention of the petitioner in the said petition was that the members of the petitioner-union were discriminated in the matter of overtime and other facilities. This Court directed that investigation should be done and decision arrived at be communicated to the petitioner. It is the 2 contention of the petitioner that investigation has not been done and the chargesheets are a directly sequel to this direction issued to the respondents. 3. We need not go into that issue as the chargesheets are based on the complaints made by the employers. Merely because the respondents-Board did not act on the complaints for some time, would not mean that it was not within the jurisdiction of the Board not to issue the chargesheets. The members of the petitioner-Union will have an opportunity apart from putting up their case, of leading evidence in respect of their contention. 4. Considering the above, we are not inclined to interfere at this stage to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( F.I. REBELLO, J.) F.I. REBELLO, J.) F.I. REBELLO, J.) ( ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. ) ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. ) ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. )