IN THE HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE, AT BILASPUR (C.G FIRST APPEAL No. 14- /2008 APPELLANT /'RESPONDENT ..•••/ ,^y ..••'J?. •' '^ 'Sunita Garg, W/o. Shri Krishna Kumar Garg, aged about 40 years, Proprietor M.Sakhi Saheli Saries Shop No. J-47 Textile Market, Pandari, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS •^Vikash Kumar Saraf, S/o. Shri Ashok Chand Saraf, aged about 25 'ears, resident of in front of Gukul Chandrama Temple, Budapara, District Raipur (C.G.). .d" ft- ^•"'^ .-fv~ "% .«[?' ^ Suitvaluedat Rs.2,33,610/- F.A. valued the same Stamp for appeal Rs. 27,"880/- APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE QF.CIVIL PROCEDURE !R!-'BJJlli!'r^^' •^S^S^^s:-'^^'^"? 311^1 qn K'u'h "cWT ^n^?T sr>*i WH<fTa»HI«b 3^? •^IAIW^, atil'y'is, f°«ti'Hli<, . • P;j4-'-JY)i6. ) H ^200'?' 311^1 'q?^ (1cltyy:T) (iwii^ <-{T?a 3TI^?T ShriAlok Nigam, counsel Shri Kshitij Sharma, count Leamed counsel appearii|ig compromise took place betwee| 4>l-i1^'(fl*1 *im^ ^f fe*<t 1tFa)'fc$i< ^aifipTsnfefi for the appellant. sei for the respondent. for the appellant submits.that i the parties and, iherefore, this appeal has become infructuous| In viewofthe above subrfiission, this appeal is dismissed as has become infructuous. Cbnsequentty, I.A. 01,| application for stay star 4^- N.K^arwa!- Judge '