IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.36591 -M of 2010 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : AUGUST 24, 2011 MAKHAN SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Gursharan Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. Tribhawan Singla, Advocate, for respondent No.2. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 This petition has been filed under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, praying for quashing of FIR No.92 dated 12.9.2008 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Dhanuala, District Barnala (Annexure P-1). 2 Learned counsel for the respondent-State has pointed out that the charges were framed against the petitioner on 21.7.2009. The factum of framing of charges has not been brought out in the petition. The order framing charges and the charge-sheet have not been challenged. It has further been brought out that five witnesses have already been examined and the trial is in progress. Criminal Misc. No.36591 -M of 2010 (O&M) 2 3 Because the trial court is seized of the matter and five witnesses have already been examined, in view of stage of case, no ground for interference is made out. 4 The petition is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to take all the grounds taken in this petition before the trial court, during the course of trial. August 24, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?