MGJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Letters Patent Appeal No. 33 sof 2007 with Civil Applicatuion No.56 of 2004 Maharashtra State Electricity Board and others ..Appellant vs. Karyalin Karmachari Sanghatana ..Respondent Ms.A.R.S.Baxi for appellant. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. 12th March 2007 12th March 2007 12th March 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. Learned Counsel admitted before this Court that when the petition was filed there was no recognised Union. Therefore, the observation of the learned single Judge that all the Unions should be called for discussion is justified. No interference is called for. L.P.A. is rejected. 3. In view of rejection of the L.P.A. civil application does not survive and hence rejected. (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.)