IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 6579 of 2010 Date of Decision: 08.12.2010 Neeraj Kapoor .... Petitioner Versus Promila ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : None for the petitioner Mr. Gaurav Sethi, Advocate for the respondent ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 13.9.2010 passed by Addl. District Judge, Ambala thereby directing the husband-petitioner to pay pendente lite maintenance to the wife and daughters ` 14,000/- per month and over and above ` 11,000/- as litigation expenses. Learned counsel for the wife-respondent states that for the first time husband has filed rent receipt and pay slip before this Court and these documents were not filed before the trial Court. Learned counsel for the respondent further states that from the statement of accounts of the husband it transpires that some times he gets ` 30,000/- per month and some times he gets ` 20,000/- or ` 25,000/- per month. He further states that husband besides salary is getting commission also. From the perusal of the impugned judgment, I do not find any discussion on this point. Moreover, since salary slip was not before the trial Court, I think it would be C.R. No. 6579 of 2010 2 appropriate to direct the trial Court to decide the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act afresh after taking into consideration pay slip, rent receipt and allegations of the wife that over and above monthly salary, husband gets commission. Present petition stands allowed with the direction to learned Addl. District Judge, Ambala to decide the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act afresh in the light of observations made herein above. Meanwhile, as an interim measure, husband-petitioner shall keep on paying the pendente lite maintenance to the wife ` 14000/- per month. (ALOK SINGH) 08.12.2010 JUDGE reena