AB 311/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI This is an application made under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail by the petitioners, namely, 1. Md. Buruj Ali, 2. Nur Islam, 3. Md. Soidur Rahman, 4. A Samad @ Samad Ali, 5. Rofiqul Ali, 6. Shah Jamal, 7. Majom Ali, 8. Kajom Ali @ Abul Kalam Azad, 9. Tahej Uddin, 10. Shaha Jamal, 11. Naban Fakir, 1 2. Fokir Ali, 13. Jairuddin, 14. Sairuddin, 15. Samar Ali, 16. Jalil, 17. Amir K uli, 18. Ainul Hoque, 19. Md. Mainul Hoque, 20. Haowa Bibi, 21. Hunufa Begum and 22. Rukia Begum, in connection with Dalgaon Police Station Case No. 686/2010, u nder Sections 147/148/149/448/326/436/307 IPC. Perused the above application and materials on record. Perused also the relevant case diary. Heard Mr. A Ali, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. BS Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. Considering the of incriminating nature of materials available in the ca se diary against the petitioners, this Court is of the view that, in the facts a nd attending circumstances of the present case, the petitioners have not been ab le to make out any case for granting the benefit of pre-arrest. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the prayer for pre-arrest b ail, made by the petitioners, is hereby rejected. However, as far as the female petitioners, namely, petitioner Nos. 20, 21 and 22 , are concerned, they may surrender in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, D arrang, Mangaldoi, and if, on their appearance in the learned Court below, as di rected hereinbefore, they apply for regular bail in connection with the case afo rementioned, the learned Court below shall consider and dispose of the same, in accordance with law, bearing in mind the fact that the petitioner Nos. 20, 21 an d 22 are female persons. With the above observations and directions, this petition shall stand disposed o f.