1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.02.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.190 of 2011 and MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.1 of 2011 Varathamanathi Anai Pasana Periyakulam Kanmai Vivasaykal Sangam rep. by its President Karuppasamy. .. Petitioner/Petitioner/Plaintiff Vs. 1.The Executive Officer, Ayakudi Town Panchayat, Palani, Dindigul District. 2.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Ayakkudi, Palani, Dindigul District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, Dindigul District. 4.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 5.N.Palanivel (Fifth respondent has been impleaded as per order dated 15.02.2011 passed in M.P(MD)No.2 of 2011) .. Respondents/Respondents/Defendants Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the Sub Court, Palani to dispose of Interlocutory Application No.832 of 2010 in Original Suit No.435 of 2010 as early as possible. For petitioner : Mr.A.Arumugam ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the Sub Court, Palani to dispose of Interlocutory Application No.832 of 2010 in Original Suit No.435 of 2010 as early as possible. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2. It is stated in the revision petition that the revision petitioner herein as plaintiff has instituted Original Suit No.435 of 2010 on the file of the Court below for the relief of permanent injunction, wherein the petition in question has been filed in Interlocutory Application No.832 of 2010 under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying to pass an order of temporary injunction, in which an ex-parte ad-interim injunction has been granted and the same has been periodically extended. But all of a sudden, the same has not been extended. Under the said circumstances, the present petition has been filed so as to give necessary direction to the Court below. 3. Considering the fact that in Interlocutory Application No.832 of 2010, an ex-parte ad-interim injunction has been granted initially and the same has been subsequently extended and also considering that the earlier order passed in Interlocutory Application No.832 of 2010 has not been subsequently extended, this Court is of the view to give necessary direction to the Court below to dispose of Interlocutory Application No.832 of 2010 as indicated below. 4. In fine, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed without costs and the Sub Court, Palani is directed to dispose of Interlocutory Application No.832 of 2010 in Original Suit No.435 of 2010 before 11.03.2011 and report the same to the Registry without fail and the Registry is directed to send a copy of this order forthwith. Till then both parties should maintain status-quo. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. smn Sd/- Assistant Registrar[P&A] /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The Subordinate Judge, Palani. Copy to: 1. The Section Officer, Judicial Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 2. The Section Officer, VR. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.190 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 Dated:15.02.2011 2P/4C RPB 22.02.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/