IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.511 of 2010 1. RIMA KUMARI W/O SHRI PATI NARAYAN MISHRA R/O VILL. AMHI MISHIR, P.O. JIGNA DUBEY, P.S. BHORE, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRI KULDIP NARAYAN, THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GOPALGANJ 3. SRI RAKESH CHOUDHARY, DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, GOPALGANJ 4. SRI AKHILESHWAR PRASAD, BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BHORE, P.O.+P.S.- BHORE, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 5. SRI BISHESHWAR RAM, MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ CHATIYAW, P.O.- CHATIYAW, P.S. BHORE, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 6. SRI BIDYA PD. RAI, PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ CHATIYAW, P.O. CHATIYAW, P.S. BHORE, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 7. TARKESHWAR PD. GUPTA S/O SHYAM PRASAD GUPTA R/O VILL.- DAHIYAW, P.O. JAGANA DUBEY, P.S. BHORE, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 8. GYANTI DEVI W/O SUBHASH GORA R/O VILL.- AMAHI MISHOR, P.O. JIGANA DUBEY, P.S. BHORE, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 9. RISHIKESH TIWARY S/O RAM AWADH TIWARI R/O VILL.- DAHIYAW, P.O. JIGANA DUBEY, P.S. BHORE, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 10. KUMAR NIRAJ PRASAD S/O CHHEDI BAITHA R/O VILL.- CHATIYAW, P.O. JIGANA DUBEY, P.S.- BHORE, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 11. INDU DEVI W/O RAM ABADH RAM R/O VILL.- BELWA, P.O. MUSHAHARI, P.S. VIJAYIPUR, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 12. SHAKIR ANSARI S/O RAJ MAHAMMAD ANSARI R/O KATAIYA, P.O. KATAIYA, P.S. KATAIYA, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 13. SURYA DEO PRATAU PYASI S/O MAHANAND MISHRA R/O VILL.- DIHWA, P.O. JIGANA DUBEY, P.S. BHORE, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ ----------- 8 22.06.2011 The opposite party, Panchayat Secretary, who is present in Court, has supplied the original appointment letter dated 16.05.2011 through his counsel Sri 2 Madan Kumar Mishra who has handed it over to Sri Bipin Bihari Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. By this letter, petitioner has been appointed as a Panchayat Teacher in the Primary School Chhatiyawan. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the father’s name of the petitioner has been wrongly mentioned as Shri Pati Narayan Tiwary. It should be Shri Pati Narayan Mishra. The appointment letter shall be treated as corrected to that extent. Since the appointment letter has been handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner in Court today, the petitioner is directed to present herself before the headmaster of the school within three days along with the said appointment letter. On her appearance and on receipt of the appointment letter the headmaster of the school shall accept the joining of the petitioner as Panchayat Teacher in the school. Learned counsel appearing for opposite party no.9 submits that the petitioner has been appointed after removing opposite party no.9. He submits that the 3 opposite party no.9 is aggrieved by his removal and the appointment of the petitioner in his place. Therefore, he seeks liberty to challenge the same in accordance with law in an appropriate proceeding. That liberty is granted to opposite party no.9. In view of this development, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not intend to proceed in the matter and he seeks permission to withdraw the application. The MJC application is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)