IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28871 of 2008 JAINUL @ LAMBU & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 25.08.2008 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned Counsel for the State and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. A complaint case was initially filed vide Complaint Case No. 1086C of 2004 that was referred to police and First Information Report was registered under Sections 366(A) 372/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that the informant’s minor girl was kidnapped by the named accused persons. Submission is that the victim has been recovered from the custody of her mother cum informant. The victim has not been examined under Section 164 Cr.P.C. Cognizance was taken earlier and the victim has been recovered. Opposing the prayer, learned Counsel for the complainant/ informant has submitted that when the cognizance was taken, the girl was dropped at the door of the informant and the petitioner has not surrendered despite rejection of anticipatory bail application in April, 2006. - 2 - Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners Jainul @ Lambu and Yunus are ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Pothia (Paharkatta) P.S. Case No. 117/2004/G.R. No. 769/2004. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)