37 % 30.05.2011 Present; Mr. L.K. Singh, Adv. for the petitioners. Mr. M.P. Singh, AFP for the State with SI. S. Khokhar, P.S. Shakarpur. Crl. M.A. No. 6590/2011 (exemptionl Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. + Crl. M.C. No. 1836/2011 •k By the order impugned in this petition, application under Section 313 Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioners has been dismissed by the Trial Court. By the said application, petitioners had prayed that PW3 and PW6 be recalled for their further cross-examination. It may be noted that PW3 is husband of PW6. It emerges from the record that PW3 has been cross-examined as many as on six dates. His cross-examination runs into more than 35 pages. While closing the cross-examination of PW6, on 8^^ February, 2010, Trial Judge has noted that accused persons were only interested in harassing the witness and delaying the disposal/trial of this case. In these circumstances, I do not find it justifiable to recall PW3 in the witness box. However, while cross-examination of PW6 was going on, counsel had sought adjournment on the ground that he was not Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified feeling well. Trial Court ought to have acceded to this request by giving a short date. Accordingly, one opportunity is granted to the petitioners to conclude the cross-examination of PW6, subject to cost of ^5,000/-, which shall be paid to the witness i.e. PW6 and for this purpose Trial Court shall fix a date. It is made clear that on the date fixed by the Trial Court, counsel for the petitioners shall conclude the cross-examination of PW6. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. Crl. M.A. No. 6589/2011 (stay) Disposed of as infructuous. A.K. PATHAK, J. May 30, 2011 rb