IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2010 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 37879 of 2010(H) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- P.PRASANTHA, W/O.LATE K.SUGATHAN, POIKAVILA VEEDU, SREENARAYANAPURAM, P.O.VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS. RESPONDENT: ---------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (RURAL) AT ATTINGAL. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.M.MANOJ. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 37879 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 21st day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner pertains to the inaction on the part of the respondent to give effect to the decision of the Regional Transport Authority, Attingal in granting renewal of permit in respect of vehicle bearing registration No. KL 16/D 4114. The contention of the petitioner is that despite the granting of the same, no action was taken by the respondent to endorse the same so as to give effect to the aforesaid decision. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader. In case, the permit in respect of vehicle bearing registration No. KL-16/D 4114 has been renewed by the RTA, Attingal, the respondent is bound to take appropriate steps for giving effect to the same by endorsing the same and by issuing the renewed permit. Therefore, the respondent shall consider Ext.P7 and pass appropriate orders thereon. This shall be done, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge