i w %-€SiSl. I'^llg-t ;»>a X &•» g. .g"i.^ls'.>;s' tlll.i2- ~< V3 ft'ii. "• fs o (ra a (1 ffl S- iJfl CT i=: ,ia ;'3.^;1 ^'tlj- £.'g'"':" •F—.'CO.,;^,^ ^ •'.^•''•^ w 'O- — !M^;.. • :r-1: W> ^ 1_. t; o &" "^ ,. .0 [iQ:s.§.^ S ,55 OT ^', 3; ci- 8 ^ o tS 2 s- :§-.'S ?*£-•?-§ lijlj ,•.*-.: )-Ai: <T> ^, 'po:. w '^ ^,~-ifi:- CT- "! a6g. n' ^^g-lls; iJi?ft s^^ii e ^'" o"" §" f- S. &. n :„" '"» C> J:ft :'0- .t'° 0> M. .•~ •u. ^. 13 °" 4^ - a TO (» ' i GC B(» c? .'B -o " ; ?'" "i s" °!" °' ?: "•s '~il s 3.i~s| •CO; &3' <: b'"-' ^ ,M .ro' w B 2o i'ss'&. s- y£*<°" '— n 5" cn iy Oi»~^- '< /ol:.'n.. S3.. R^ »=L-t '" in'S'S.'.'t" i?:1111 -wffvfSS'SSfSW XI-HC-22' 31)^1 ^il 1?:tR73T|^( ^•Ri^ yf?ci -3^:»iP!RP(,??flWl3', 1»«flW1< r2W--^ sni^i ^^n^R •yf^d Diviskin Sench: - . Hon'ble Mr. 1..C. Bhadoo and Hon'bieftIr.DhirendraMishra.JJJ 134.20C6 Mr. Prakash Tivran, counsei Mr. U.N.S. Deo, Additiona Bhatia, Panel Lawyer for the ^irtheappeltant. Pubtic Proseciiter wifri Mr. M.P.S. State/r^spondent. Oraljudgmen'tciictatedonD^w. Per LC.Shadoo. J: - By this appeal under Section questioried legaitTy and correctness of sentence ticted 28ttl Mea'ch; 19^7, Judge, SolodG Bcnaar, in Se-ssiorjs Additional Sessions Judgfe after h<|) eommission of offence under Sectiob murder of her son nameiy, ©uddu smpt'isonment for iife and pay a fine fpf fine to further under90 R.I. for six r|ton+hs. The case of the prosecufion, p.m. the accused/appeilant attacke^l sorpeRter axe. ftspori' of the fflat|t'er Kotwar. under Ex.P-4 in Poiice Statiori Poffce Statjoh Hoftse Offieer of the *• / . .. . ' • . ' Seetion 3Q7of the I.P.C. andtbok . +l'<I<'l''fl-l tll"<A''?'fST3t^+dlt •^ SlPW 311^1 ..-A' ^74 (2) of the Cr.P.C. the appellant has \ff ihe Judgnieftt af ebnvictioh ond ocder' 7, passed by the Additignol Sessions ^ .Trial No.101/94. whereby iear-nea llding the accused/ia|ipeliont guiity for 302 of ttie I.P.C., fopcommittin9 the L.akshman, senteneed her to undergo fts;l,000/-,[n defautt of payment of inbrjef, is thoton 2-3-93 at about 5 hef son Suddu @ Lokshman with a was Iddged by Brysndian (PW-3), i: Kasdoi. Receiving this report, the Stdtion registered offence under p the investi9Cftion. In •ttie mean time, •[•4@^R^ ^ -.*"; F g|:i,:i. lj||ijjf:]lj[lj^'XJ-HC-22 'leL-.i Iffi^i ^•^'- \i ir.; 311^1 ^it 1?:iJ37311^r ^iE^^tf^T 3S[ •^l'illd^, ^fRTTS, ftdl.yy -£• ^^..:m!.^ -286— merg in+ma+ton Ex.P-12 was given Iff^ Lskshman in the hospitalon 3-8-93 4t cohver-ted into Section 302 of the II Pohehnawa Ex.P-5of the dead body the Investigating Offieer.; Sari of] unsier Ex.P-7. Piain soil and Uood under Ex.P-lQ. The weappn of possession under Ex.P-li. Site plan| pr<spared by the Patwari. Injury of A.K. Jhcnwar (PW-1) and he prepare^ wos conducted fcty t>r-. P.iS. Tiwari sRdl he prepcred the post-mor'tem sept for ch'emicaf exciminationto Foitel t»herethe report Ex.P-16 t»asreceiv^d (1>t AfTer cGiiipleTlon of (nvestlgaj'ti of Judiciai Magistrate, First Ciass, the cose to the Sessiona Judge, (( Sessions Judge, Biiioda.Bazaar*, recej The prosecution in orcier +a examined 12 witnesses. Statemerr] and the evidence given by her own sc rtse cririte/She stated that shie conii^jtTed the o'ime out ef smger. '^— '*Wl<rt<il-t IWl'il''? fS^ <[:a|t<;lt. ^SlpOT 311^1 ^ Fjran regording thejtiectfi of Suddu 11.30 p.ni. upon which the offence wos IP.C. Afrer giving notice to •rtie Panchas, :"1< ' ' ! ! • ' '-" '• 1 . • • of.Suddu @ Lakshman wiw prepared by ]the accused was taken into possession ttained soil were token ihto possession o1]fence, cwpenter axe, wcs take'h into |of the place of occurrence Ex.P-13 was ^uclalu @ L<d<riimanw<K! e?«at«inedbvt)r. re^ the injury report Ex.P-1. Post-mortem (VtjU'-2) of Pnmtsry Health Centr's, Kasdo!, r|spprt Ex.P-2; Recoyered CB'ticies were Foitensic Seience Lafaoratory, ftaipur, froro rton.chcrgesheeTwas f.11ed Inthe Court Baloda Bozoar', who ih turn tbmmitted ^aipur, from whwe iecmed Acldttional ved the case on tronsfer for triaS. establiai eharge against tliiie fliccused 6f the occtised was recorded under Seetion 313 of the Cr.P.C. in whidi sl|ieNmitted commission of criffle by her n Hen<ant KumQp (PW-4) who witnessec! •[^^fe^ l!::i, '' •/ r;^;? ^,"-- -1- XI-HC-22 sn^f^i: Rt-li* 311^1 %tiWHl^( k-' •g^^ira?R(, •g^ite7re, ft<nwT,< 3Tr^?T -q^, ^&M^ Ri r ( 'MI, TR1*<CT! (BHI<* sn^c^giwflftB Leafned Aciditianai Sessions conv'cted and sentenced the ;aiscA judgment. :' We hflve heard tor. ProkteH and Mr, UMS, beo, leorned Addttil; Bhatta, tearnec! Panel L<wyer on i?eh<ji The homici<lai decf+i of Sudciid ru^ge aftar heafing fespectlve counsel, sed as nnentioned in pora l of this iwori, learned counsel for the cypeliont inal Publsc Prosecutor with Mr. M.P.5. If of rtieState/r'eSpondent, © Lakshman te net in dispute. As far as involysment of -tf criffle is concerned, Hemant Kumar C of the deceased, has categorically incident he was ct the residencs sr bro+her with a corpenter oxe on the does not know as to why his mother* The abovs evicience hcs to ^tatement under Section 313 of conimission of crinie and she has stat <tnger. In enss-exdtninatiofl af this has not been abte fo elicit any cipcu this i«itn?&unrslicbie or urrfrustwo witness'stands corr'oborert'ed by ti recpvered ort 6 instance of the exawinationto.theForensicScience ^rai?ran ^Rfl ^ fest tfa-^it ^?3!pOT'3II^i ^c accused/appeltant in cotnniission of PW-4), son of the accused and brothsr s1|oted in his eviderice that <rt the time of |d his mother Heera Bdi (isscuhed his neck, os a resuit of whicn he dieei. He dlssaultetl •rtie cleceoseda be^n cdniltted by the accused in her Ittis Cr.P.C, She has acimitted the ^d thut she committed the crimeout of I'itness (PW-4 Hemanf iCumar'), defence cipcutnstanee, which makes the evidence of s^thy. Moreover, the evidenea of this |e fact that the carpentep cxe was ^ccused, /Same wois sent for chemicai (aboi'atoi'Y avd as per tha'Labaratary's ['(ft^y<ai ^s' :; i' ^ ^.Liiilltiy^U.^'fiMl''^' /nd^fc^«****~u XI-HC-22 aiWujimp!<i w ~^sr^(rai?p(, ijiTi)'yii!»,'i»icti'yi< 4 ^ 3I^?t'3i1 h-fw ss^i S^*1 ^fi^ MW711 WWeis 2S9~ report, ,the axe was stained wi+k b| <s!so found stsined with blood. inyolyement of the accused/appetidnji' cccused assauited her own^on aged ordinary course, no mother woula ii atated by the gccused in her stati St)T^d4itf TTTHcff ^ ^^ ^R^R ^siPaHsii^r ood. Even thtf sari of tlr .aeeuaect was iretore,!n view of ths above svidence, in the crime in question is estabfished. Leacned counsel fop the apj^ellant argued that i+ is ti'ue that the ]about2i-ye<!rs~wlthayasyla,butinthe (<e td kili hw own chitd arKi as has been ^meHt, out of anger she assaul+ed the deceased. Elaborating the argumen^, Mr. Prakash Tiwapi also submift'ed thut there is nothirw on reeord, i«hich|shows that the accused assaulted the decsosed with IntehtjoR tocduse.d^al+i pr there wos RO pre-pltm or pre- ntedita+ion.. ; \: O) +he other hand;Mp.Bhtr(i Court. In o^der to appreciate the ai|guments we have perused theeyidence. Xn the first instance, Memant Kunia| cannot be ^aid thot the occused w<ri reach to thy'extentof tttlliriaKim. ^ /,. others reported in ASK 2004 Si^are io supported the judgment of +he trial (PW-4). br'othef of the deceased; has categoricaity stated that he dpes ?4t know as to why his fflother assoulted the dececsed. The occused has cat^orically stated thafout of anger she assaulted the deceased. The boy w^s hcrdly 2 ^ yecrs of sge, therefore, it havtng any grudgie agaihst hirn so as to In the circumstances, intention part is missing ih''this case, as has been hefd by •t+ie.Apex Court ih the.niatter of Shivoppo Btrida^o Koliwraiias B«^ddn^>ogoi v. Sfti'ts of Kamotato and ine Court5047th(rt [Tfl^^fe4; BiR.il Blte^ XI-HC-22 sn^r^iT 1?:?pTsn^i SCTWfflpr /*•' 'v. ^-E^ ?qpn?I?, 'g'^iftms, 1s|^R?y sn^i 'g'oigi 'ai?g 'Accused during qua^ve! soiitCBybtoiwon his death - hte ppe-n(editai attacK decefKed — MlBdicci trtjury iRficfed by its^! eour-se of nature to Jmputeclm'thknowied^e fikafy *o cauae deatti.'l back lof hesri of slececsed suddehly +o0l< gxe and gave result|»^into n(editoted or pre-crnwiged plan fo evidence npt showing rtiat !!*wou!d be syfficient in or-dincry lc^use desth - Accused sould be ; that iryury infiicted by him was d|ay attackiartd In the present case aisQ, th( 1993 at 5 p.rti; and te died next aftsr" cboiit 30 hsurs of ths had the propep fr'eatmenf given ta| the child. The doctor, hos not ^ deceased was suffjcient 'm the Therefofe,; jooking to th4 (rttrifauted to th®occused, howev^r" assauh'itig •t'he^eeeosed with a 2 ^ years' chird oh his neck, the causing such an iry'ury with carpent^ +he circumsttinces, offence against j Pa^-I of the I.P.C. was rncide out. ef l+te I.P.C. md sentence impose<j connot be sustoined. aliowetf. Convict^on anci sentence inj ^)T^<Tinn '^W^ff ^ ^^ ~<N^R %3riiOT3tI^, . i|s deceased was assoylted on 2nd Auflust; on 3"i August, 1993 at .11.30 p.m. i.e. moreover'thedoctorhasstatedthat ^t him, •Aere wefe chdnces of sumival of ijtuted that the iruury infticted on the ordif|ary cour'se of nature to cause death. arcumston&M, inttntion cannot ba •, jt can safely be inferred that while weapen lika corpentw axe. that too a ^ccufied had defmite knowledge that fay •^raxe.dlemcylikalytGcausedeart. In 1-he aceused/appslidnt umler SectjOn 304 IHierefore, conviction under -Section 302 upon tiia appetfdnt' under thdt Section In the fesutT, The appeoi ^jortiy .succseds en<i the sdme is ptsrtty posed upon the accused/aptiettant under ^•1 [T^.^f^ y^ 'v ••y Ty XI-HC-22 31'^I^iT Rii.'n sn^i' ^^i=n ^ft?f ^cmQ '3^'•^FIRPT, ,'S'afOTS, &cll<ay @) b _..^.:...MfcQ,^^. lllMril *4i<* ' Section 302 of •the I.P.C. w«set undar Secfion 304 Pcirt-I of the LPt years. The accused is stdtecf to b^ been disputed by letn-ned Additiojial occused has dlready undepgone the| she be set at Ijberty forthwith, if PaTttes are en+itled f&r cer+i^ied copy of thisordeF. Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge ^i^f?t'iftf Tftfl^ff ^ 'f^Ct' <Pn^i< 1; 3)Ptfq 311^1 aside, tnstead thereof, she is convic+ad .C.ond sentenced to undergo R.I. for ten in custody since 4-8-93, which has not \'{! ; ,- " . . - • , . \ _•• ,'Public Prosecutor. Therefore, the ' ^ ' i ' sentence imposed upon her and as such, required in any other ease. nt>t Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge -. /