1.1.2009 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner. Mr. R. K. Sharma, Addl. A. G. with Mr. Anil Jaswal, Dy. A. G. for the respondents. CWP(T) No.3031/2008 (OA No.347/1996) The applicant’s father died on 2.10.1988. Since then she and her family members are seeking compassionate appointment. One such representation was rejected by the State in terms of orders dated 21.10.1994 (Annexure A-3) for the reasons that the applicant was born out of an illegal marriage between Shri Jagdish Chand (applicant’s father) and Smt. Neelam Devi. The same is under challenge before this Court. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that during the pendency of the present petition a fresh representation has been made by Shri Pawan Kumar (applicant’s brother) to the Secretary (Revenue) which is still pending. According to her, the family is living in absolute state of destitution and under the circumstances, notwithstanding the time factor, it is a fit case in which the family deserves a sympathetic and favourable consideration of the representation. She further submits that she will file an additional representation indicating the fact that the findings in Annexure A-3 with regard to the status of the applicant and her brother are contrary to the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Learned counsel for the parties agree that the State shall decide the representation within a period of six weeks after the additional representation is received. Needless to add, as has been agreed by the parties, the State shall decide the same without taking into consideration the orders dated 21.10.1994. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition stands disposed of. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. January 1, 2009 (rana)