IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 6339 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 28th April, 2010. Vijay Kumari Petitioner through Mr. O.P.Gaba, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Mrs. Charu Tuli, Sr. DAG, Punjab Mr. Gaurav Singla, Advocate, for respondent No.4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 11.01.2010 [Annexure P-3] whereby recovery on account of the alleged wrong payment of dearness relief on the family pension paid to her, is sought to be made. The petitioner's husband - Ashok Kumar, who was employed as Clerk in the office of the Executive Engineer, Eastern Division, Ferozepur, died in harness on 24.02.2003 and as a consequence thereto, the petitioner was granted family pension. Later on, her son was given appointment on compassionate grounds. Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involved in this writ petition is squarely answered by a decision of this Court in CWP No. 1961 of 2010 [Manjit Kaur v State of Punjab & Ors.] decided on 27 th April, 2010. For the reasons mentioned in Manjit Kaur's case [supra], this writ petition is allowed in the same terms. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. April 28, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE