f%n^ iyii S''v£3' ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) WRIT PETITION N0. f ^^/2005 PETITIONER ' Madhu Pandey Now Smt. Madhu Tiwari, Wife of Shri Dinesh Tiwari, aged about 40 years, Resident of Mata Chowra, Kududand, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^"^ 1. Stateof Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.). 2. The Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchalnalay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 3. The District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 4. State of Madhya Pradesh, through: The Secretary, Department of Education, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, (M.P.). 5. The Secretary, General Administration, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. XI-HC-22 3^ "t(l*<lc1<4, ^Tn'M^IC, fc)dW^< 3ll^( M5)cn MINdlsbNJch' "^" 'l'" •'' •''•''"rt ''• {^- 200^ ^ 3:fl^T^T f^'Tra'^n^T ^TJ^^fScT -11' ^ ^sf' 3TT^r?^nw^f?cT 19^1-2005 Mr. P.P. Sahu, counsel for th Mr. Bhaskar Pyasi, Panel Lav|yer for the State of Chhattisgarh. Heard both the counsel. The petitloner has preferred the Constitution of India, and her njiain grievance is that she was appointed 1(983 vide Annexure P-1, and her services ^rd Deeember, 1983 (Annexure P-3). ith as ad-hoc teacher on 30W August, were terminated vide ordor datecj the petjtioner may also be ailowed| No.3, to which, tearned counso} detailed representatjon to responde represontation made by the petition] three months from the date of the r^ cr>N?<n41Ti ^H^T^tel^t<{^«i< ^3Tl^q'3TT^r petitjoner. ;his writ petitlon under Arttole 226/227 of Thereafter, the petitioner made s^wri representationa vide Annexure P-5, butthe respondents have not paid a|iy heed to her representatjonfc Learned counsel for the petii|oner submits that other sjmjlarly situated teachers have also moved the ^tate Government, and they had been consjdered and appointment has b^en given, therefore. in the circumstances, to make a representation to respondent for tho State of Chhattisgarh has no objection. Having heard tearned couns^l for the partiesand having regard to the facts and circumstances of the c^se, the petitioner is allowed to make a it No.3 within ten days from today raising ai! her grievances, and in turn, re^pondent No.3 is directed to consider the i|ar and decide th©same wlthin a period of |ceipt of the representation jn an objective manner after considering the griev^nces of the petitioner, jn accordance with iaw. With the direction aforesaid, <he petition stands disposed of. Parties are entitled for certifiejd copy ofthisorder. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge