THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY C.R.P.Nos.3505, 3471 and 3589 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: All these revision petitions are directed against the orders, dated 20.04.2009, passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Peddapuram in I.A.Nos.577 and 578 of 2007 in A.S.Nos.12 of 1998 and I.A.No.584 of 2007 in A.S.No.1 of 1999 respectively, wherein the applications filed for condoning the delay of 2414 days in filing the application to set aside abatement and to bring the legal representatives of the deceased second appellant; to set aside the abatement consequent to the death of the second appellant-Burayya alias Veparayya; and to add petitioners 2 to 9 therein as appellants 2 to 9 in the appeal respectively, were dismissed. The respondent in C.R.P.Nos.3505 and 3471 of 2007 filed O.S.No.12 of 1992 before the Junior Civil Judge, Prathipadu seeking permanent injunction restraining the petitioners from interfering and causing obstruction of peaceful enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by raising a house therein. The petitioners contested the said suit and the same was decreed on 24.07.1998. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners filed A.S.No.12 of 1998. Similarly, the deceased first petitioner in C.R.P.No.3589 of 2009 filed O.S.No.33 of 1992 before the Junior Civil Judge, Prathipadu seeking permanent injunction restraining the respondents therein from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property. On dismissal of the said suit on 24.07.1998, A.S.No.1 of 1999 was filed. During the pendency of the said appeals, the second petitioner in C.R.P.Nos.3505 and 3471 of 2009 died on 20.06.2000 and his estate devolved on petitioners 4 and 5 in the said C.R.Ps. and they are in possession and enjoyment of the same. The father of the first petitioner died on 27.12.2000 and the third petitioner died on 10.02.2007. Hence, the above I.As were filed. The only ground stated by the petitioners for condoning the delay is that the second petitioner in C.R.P.Nos.3505 and 3471 of 2009 died on 20.06.2000, the father of the first petitioner died on 27.12.2000 and the third petitioner was diagnosed as HIV patient and died on 10.02.2007. The Court below having not satisfied with the said reason, rejected to condone the delay in filing the application to set aside the abatement and to bring the legal representatives of the deceased second petitioner as parties to A.S.No.12 of 1998 and dismissed I.A.No.577 of 2007. In view of dismissal of I.A.No.577 of 2007, I.A.Nos.578 and 584 of 2007 were also dismissed. Even according to the petitioners, the said Burayya died on 20.06.2000. The petitioners have not chosen to implead the legal representatives of Burayya within the time, but only after the death of the third petitioner on 10.02.2007, the above applications were filed stating that due to the family calamities one after the other, they could not file the applications within the time. The said reason do not constitute sufficient cause for condoning the delay in filing the application to set aside the abatement and to bring the legal representatives of the deceased second appellant as parties to the appeal. In view of the same, the impugned orders do not suffer from any illegality in exercise of jurisdiction warranting interference by this Court. The Civil Revision Petitions are accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J Date: 07.08.2009 va