RESPONDENTS : , w HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR K Writ Petitigg§o$§§9 or 209_3 PETITIONER Jintera Kumar Patel, S/o Shn’ Baisakhu Ram Patel, aged about 23 years, Resident of village Kumhari, Gram Panchayat Khaprideeh Via Bilaigarh, Tahsil s Kasdol, Distt. Rhipur (CG). VERSUS . State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Education Department DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panehayat Kasdol, Tahsil Kasdol, Distt. Raipu’r (CG). . Khagesh Kumar Baislmav Saxpanch of Gram Panchayat Khaprideeh, Post Kumhari Via Bilaigarh, Tahsil Kasdol, Distt. Raipur (CG). 4. Vinod Kumar Baishanv Secretary of Gram Panchayat Khaprideeh, Post Kumhari Via Bilaigarh, Tahsil Kasdol, Distt. Raipur (QG). 5. Santosh Kumar Sahu S/o Shn‘ Dukalu Ram Sahu, village Kaitha Post Parsadeeh Tahsil Bilaigarh Distt. Raipur (CG). (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J1) Present : Shn' R.S. Patel, Advocate far the petitioner. Ms. Sunita lain, Panel Lawyer for the State. . ORAL ORDER (Passed on 5*“ day of August, 2008) With the consent ofthe parties. the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 11. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the advertisement 30.07.2003 (Annexure P/l) for appointment on the post of contract school Teachers, Class III in the Primary/Middle ' School Khaprideeh, the petitioner made an application on 05.08.2003 V\V (Annexure P/2). The selection was through interview only. The petitioner, being handicapped person, was expecting for interview call letter which was never issued to him. The selection took place and the respondent No. 5 has been appointed as Contract School Teacher for academic session 2003-04. At this stage, no grievance survives, as the appointment was only for one academic session i.e. 2003-04. Even otherwise, the petitioner has no legal or statutory right to be called for interview and to be posted on a particular place. In the present case, the advertisement was published inviting applications for appointment on the post ot‘Contract School Teacher for academic session 2003-04 only, and the academic session has been over. Thus, this petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infractuous. No order as to costs. ’ Sd/- ‘ Satish K. Agnihom Judge