IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.47 of 2007. Smt. Sailee Mahadik ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondents. & Ors. Mr Shirish Gupte, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Rachita for the Applicant. Mr Y. S. Shinde, APP for the Respondent No.1. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C. DAGA,J. V.C. DAGA,J. V.C. DAGA,J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 10TH JULY, 2007. 10TH JULY, 2007. 10TH JULY, 2007. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State. 2. Perused application. 3. No case is made out to interfere in the consent terms dated 5.6.2006 recorded by the Family Court. The present application is moved on 8.1.2007 i.e. after six months from the date of recording consent terms. Thus, it is not possible to accept that consent terms were drawn under coercion or pressure. No case is made out by the applicant for cancellation of bail based on such contentions. I see no merit in the application. The application is, thus, rejected. (V.C. (V.C. (V.C. DAGA,J.) DAGA,J.) DAGA,J.)