'.' ^ V^ ~^-\--\ . "<.. ~L-\^-^- ^- IN THE HIGH CGURT OF iTUQZCATURE AT BILASPUR (CG) Cr»Revision No| 3>4^ Of 2004 ( Memorandum of Cr.jRevision U/s 397/401 o£ Cr<»iP»C* ) ^\^...---^ :<I.ONER t Durga Kaushik W/o Vljay Kumar / Daughter o£ Tilalc Rom KaushiX^aged about 30 yea^s s/o Sa^tS. Distxict Janjgii: Ch^npa (CG)» ?I.OKER ^d^c*te i ,M1. SSPONDBNTS Versas s 1B Vijay Kumac S/o Chjindrabhan aged about 33 years» r/o 11111 Amsena PiSt HirrifT^hsJLl Takhatpur Disferiofc BJLlaspar <CG)e 2*! State of Chhattisgarh*through District Magistrate Janjgir Chgwpa (CG)» ^. ^' MEMORANDUM OP CRIMINAL REVISION u|s 397/401 Cr»t>,C» XI-HC-22 ^n^T^T ^ipt) 3TliSf sftHlcr» 'yf^ct <4 ?1»^- %-^^4,^\~ + Oo .? ^ "S^ '^qFn^PT, <^A^<^, ic]t^W^< a^nraW IYS'--3°>? ^^/cWL ^M^I^hW<b^"";7""""""T""""",,M ?ay^±J^___.....^±^.,l^ .^..........^.,........^;,. SiRgIe Bsnch %^1'^li^R:^ffd 12/07/2004:- Heard Shri Awadh Tripathi counset for the appticant and Shri Ravindra Agrawal, Panel Lawyer, for the State/respondent. This is a revision-petition filed against the judgment of acquittat. The triat Court has taken into account all acceptable evidence and after considering the same came to the conclusion that the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses cannot be acted upon 'because of the serious contradictions. It cannot be said that there has - been any procedural irregularity or illegaiity. The order is just, legai and proper and does not call for any interference. This Court is of the opinion that it is not a frt case where the revision can be admitted. tn the result, the revision- petition is dismissed. Sd/- • chi'efJustice <^li£foiill^*1W^S "^ fe^t <FII^I< i;? 3??Ni3R! ^W^. Kiosk * ^ ^ i(