IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-37776 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: 01.02.2011 Satish Kumar .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Munish Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Perusal of the record shows that age of the prosecutrix is about 14 years and statement of the prosecutrix was also recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. in which she has specifically stated that petitioner has raped her. In the present case, prosecution has produced all the witnesses. This is not a case where undue delay is being caused in the trial. No ground. Dismissed. (ALOK SINGH) 01.02.2011 JUDGE reena