IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.20481 of 2006 Date of Decision : July 21, 2010. Jagjit Singh and others .....Petitioner versus The State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.H.S.Sawhney, Senior Advocate with Mr.Rajinder Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.H.S.Brar, Additional, Advocate General, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 2.11.2006 (Annexure P-10) passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Punjab, whereby their appeal against the order dated nil (Annexure P-3) has been dismissed on the ground of limitation as well as on merit. Since the question of limitation needs to be re-determined by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Punjab in the light of the decision of a Full Bench of this Court dated 30.1.2009 passed in Civil Writ Petition No.8229 of 2007 (Jagtar Singh versus The State Transport C.W.P.No .20481 of 2006 2 Appellate Tribunal and others), the impugned order dated 2.11.2006 (Annexure P-10) is set-aside and the matter is remitted to the State Transport Appellate Tribunal for afresh decision. The Tribunal shall decide the question of limitation, as directed above, besides deciding the issues on merits as was done vide the previous order dated 2.11.2006. The appeal shall be decided within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Till then, the interim order to continue. Dasti. July 21, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE