IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’N‘ISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 4257 of 2004 Petitioner Subhadm Bai Sahu, W/o lsha Prakas Sahu, aged absut 3Q, yams, R/o Gum, Ward No.6, Dist. Durg (C.G.) Versus Respondents L State of Chhaftisgar, Through Chief Secretaxy, OEce situated at Secretariat, Raipm‘(CG) 2. Collector, Durg (Registrar Election), oiiice situatsd at Durg (C.G.) Sub Divisional O$cer, Balod (Delegatsd Regisuar, Election), OEice situated at Balod, Dist. Durg (C.G.). Tahsildar, Gurur (Sub—Registrar Election), 4. OEee situated at Gurur, Dist. Duxg (C.G.) 0:} (Writ Petiu‘on Under Aru'eie 226/ 227 oft‘he Constimtion of lndia) (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihoin‘ J.) Shri Praveen K. Dhurandhar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shli A. S. Kachwaha, Deputy Advocate General for the Iespondents. O R D E R (Passed on this (3th Day of November, 2008) 1. Learned counsel appealing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner prays for Withdrawal of this petition with liberty to make an appropriate application before the concerned authority for inclusion of his name in the voter list of Gurur, District Durg. However, the concerned authority may be directed to consider and decide the application, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within stipulated period. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents] State has no objection to the above submission. In view of the foregoing, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the above—stated liberty. Consequently, M(W)P No. 46 17/ 2004 is also dismissed. Howeverfthe concerned authority is directed to consider and decide the application, if any, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of one month from the date ofreceipt of the apphcanon. Sdl- Satish K Agnihotri Judge Thakut h k