WP(C) 5662/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE H N SARMA Heard Mr N Dutta, learned senior counsel for the petitioners and Mr D Saikia, l earned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner has under taken construction of a building over a plot of land c overed by Dag No 937, 941, 942 and 943 of KP Patta No 32 of village Japorigog of Mouza Beltola. An objection having been raised before the Municipal authority r egarding deviation of municipal laws, a notice was issued to the petitioner on 7 .2.2008 with certain directions. Thereafter another notice dated 8.4.2008 was is sued under section 337(1) and (2) of the GMC Act repeating such directions with further direction to stop the construction and to show cause within seven days a s to why the said construction should not be removed / demolished by the Corpora tion. The petitioner vide his petition dated 30.7.2008 tried to justify the cons truction stating therein certain facts. When no information of the same having r eceipt, the petitioner obtained such information through Right to Information Ac t, 2005, wherein he could learnt that his petition was disposed of apparently ig noring the merit of the same. The petitioner submitted an appeal before the Stan ding Appeal Committee, GMC, on 228.4.2009. But the Corporation having been disso lved, an Administrator was appointed by the Government who is impleaded in this writ petition as respondent No 5. The contention of the learned senior counsel for the petitioner is that the auth ority, without disposing of the appeal, is making attempt to demolish a part of the structure constructed by the petitioner and hence this writ petition. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties for some length, the learned co unsel for the parties submit that this writ petition be disposed of directing th e respondent No 5, the Administrator, GMC, to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner on 28.4.2009 in expeditious manner. In my considered opinion, in view of the fact alleged in this writ petition and in view of the fact that the decision is yet to be taken by the authorities, it would be just and proper to pass such direction to the respondent No 5. Accordin gly, this writ petition stands disposed of with the direction to the respondent No 5, the Administrator, GMC, or any other authorized body to dispose of the sta tutory appeal of the petitioner filed by the petitioner under section 438 of the GMC Act on 28.4.2009 and pass appropriate order thereon that would be justified under the facts and law. It is made clear that for a period of two weeks from t oday no demolition of the structure made by the petitioner be made in terms of t he impugned notice. If the appeal is not disposed of within the aforesaid period of two weeks, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer. With the aforesaid observations and directions this writ petition stands finally disposed of.