THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23466 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner claims to be the owner of the premises bearing No.6-2-24 (old), 6-1-62 (new) Kasba, Nirmal, Adilabad District. The same is said to have been given on rent to the fourth respondent. The petitioner states that the lease was not renewed beyond 2007. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite such non-renewal, the Regional Joint Director of School Education, the second respondent herein, had issued proceedings dated 3.01.2009 renewing the recognition of the school. The same is challenged in this writ petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner does not dispute that he has given the premises on lease to the fourth respondent. The subsequent renewal is objected to by placing reliance upon Rule 5 of the A.P. Registered Schools (Establishment, Recognition, Registration and Regulation) Rules, 1987. The relevant clauses and sub-rules are extracted in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. From a perusal of the same, it becomes clear that verification of documentary evidence, as to ownership or lease, becomes relevant at the time of according permission for establishment of the institution. In case, a lease is not renewed, it cannot constitute a ground for denial of renewal of lease. Any lessor, who wants to resume the premises, has to approach the concerned Court by initiating necessary proceedings but he cannot object to the renewal on the sole ground that the lease is not extended. Hence the writ petition is dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner to work out his remedies in a civil Court. There shall be no order a to costs. ______________________ (L. Narasimha Reddy, J.) 9th November, 2009 Js.