IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Public Interest Litigation No. 628 of 2006 (M/B) Shaied Ahamad aged about 32 years S/o Mohd. Ayub, R/o Ward No. 3, Kaladhungi, District Nainital ........ Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Secretary Dehradun, Uttaranchal. 2. The Commissioner, Kumaon Region, Nainital, Uttaranchal. 3. The District Magistrate, Nainital Uttaranchal. 4. Shri Faieem Khan, Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat Kaladhungi, District Nainital, Uttaranchal ........ Respondents ............. Sri Deep Chandra Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri B. D. Kandpal, Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 3. Sri M. C. Kandpal, Sr. Adv. with Sri Kurban Ali, Advocate for respondent no. 4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Sri Deep Chandra Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri B. D. Kandpal, Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 3. Sri M. C. Kandpal, Sr. Adv. with Sri Kurban Ali, Advocate for respondent no. 4. 2. Sri Joshi, the learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition filed as Public Interest Litigation with the liberty of making a complaint to the appropriate authorities including Lokayukta for the redressal of the grievance projected by the petitioner in this writ petition. 3. Permission granted. 4. With the above liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. With the above order, CLMA No. 6424 of 2006 also stands dismissed as withdrawn. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 19.07.2006 19.07.2006 A