THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.283 OF 2007 ORDER: Heard the counsel. This revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is preferred by the petitioner-plaintiff against the order dated 19.12.2006 passed by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, (F.T.C.) Nandyal, in I.A.No276 of 2006 in O.S.No.12 of 2003 whereby the learned Judge allowed the application holding that the document can be impounded on collection of stamp duty, and the validity of the same has to be decided at the final hearing. It is stated that the revision petitioner-plaintiff made a request to send the document, which is a partition agreement, for the purpose of impounding to the Sub-Collector, R.D.O., Nandyal. The learned Judge after recording reasons observed as hereunder: “I therefore, direct the petitioner-plaintiff to pay stamp duty and penalty as required under Article 45 r/w Article 15 of Schedule-I-A to the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. The office is directed to take into consideration the value mentioned in the certificate issued by the Sub-Registrar, Nandyal for item Nos.1 to 9 and collect stamp duty and penalty.” When a request is made praying the Court to send the document for impounding, the Court has accepted to send such document for the purpose of impounding. In the light of the same, let the learned Judge send the document to the Sub-Collector, R.D.O., Nandyal for the purpose of impounding. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed to the said extent. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ (P.S. NARAYANA, J.) 23rd June, 2010 Js.