IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND APRIL 2008 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 11270 of 2008(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ MOHAMMED HANEEFA.K AGED 24 YEARS,S/O. SAIDALIKUTTY, RESIDING AT KAYAKKAL HOUSE, ANANTHAVOOR VIA MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THEHIPALAM MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THEHIPALAM MALAPPURAM DISTRICT R1 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/04/2008 ALONG WITH WP(C) 11301/08, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 11270 & 11301 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: APRIL 2, 2008 JUDGMENT In these cases the petitioners are students of B.Tech. 2. In WP(C) 11270/08 by submitting Ext.P1 application, the petitioner has sought revaluation of one of the answer papers of the 4th semester of the supplementary examination held in June, 2007. Similarly, in W.P.(C) 11301/08, the petitioner has applied for revaluation of two papers of 3rd and 4th semester of the supplementary examination held in July 2007. The complaint in the writ petition is regarding the delay in completing the revaluation. 2. The standing counsel appearing for the University submits that the last date for applying for revaluation expired only on 31st March, 2008 and therefore the University cannot be accused of any inordinate delay in the matter. 3. Though it is true that the learned counsel for the University is justified in submitting that there was no inordinate delay in completing the revaluation, still in the matter of revaluation applied WP(C) 11270 & 11301 of 2008 Page numbers for, expeditious steps are necessary. Therefore I dispose of this writ petition directing that if the applications made by the petitioners are otherwise in order, the revaluation sought for shall be completed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-