IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 22ND AUGUST 2011 / 31ST SRAVANA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 379 of 2011(S) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SAJAN, AGED 31, S/O.LATE C.K.RAJAGOPALAN, CHEMBAKATH HOUSE, VADANAPILLY P.O., 680 614, VADANAPILLY VILLAGE, CHAVAKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.LELLULAL T.G.THUNDATHIL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SRI.BHAVADAS, AGED ABOUT 50, ADVOCATE, 'ANKITA NIVAS', SREEPURAM LANE, YAKKARA JN./ YAKKARA MUKKU, YAKKARA P.O., 678 701, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. SARITHA, W/O.BHAVADAS, 'ANKITA NIVAS', SREEPURAM LANE, YAKKARA JN./ YAKKARA MUKKU, YAKKARA P.O., 678 701, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALAKKAD EAST POLICE STATION, 678 701. R1, R2 BY SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI.JIBU P THOMAS SRI.P.S.APPU SRI.A.R.NIMOD SRI.C.A.ANOOP SRI.MATHEWS RAJU R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.K.BABU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN WP(CRL).379/11 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: PHOTOS TAKEN IN DIGITAL CAMERA SHOWING PETITIONER POSING WITH DETENUE. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF E MAIL PRINT OUT DATED 27.11.2010 SENT BY DETENUE TO PETITIONER. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF E MAIL PRINT OUT DATED 20.9.2009 SENT BY DETENUE TO PETITIONER. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF E MAIL PRINT OUT DATED 9.6.2009 SENT BY DETENUE TO PETITIONER. /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ----------------------------------- W.P(Crl.).No.379 OF 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 22nd day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,J. The alleged detenue is present by herself in court with her parents who are respondents 1 and 2 in this petition. On the commencement of court proceedings, we let her be in the Chambers of one among us. We spoke to her after about 1 ½ hours in Chambers. She is well-oriented, coherent and specific on her statement that she does not desire to go with the petitioner. She also expressed that she does not need to talk to the petitioner though we prompted her that she will be free to do so, if needed. With this, we find no reason to hold that the alleged detenue Bhagya is in the illegal detention of respondents 1 and 2. This matter is accordingly closed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- K.SURENDRA MOHAN, Judge. kkb.22/8.