'I IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARHl W. P. N0.9^^ OF 2004 ^ PETITIONER <?-- Mehtab Singh, S/o Shri LaJ^ C\£^^ f^if Aged aboutsz-" years, ^ ,^^ Occupation - Ser/ice 2p^'a 1 Presently posted as Head ^^, •••""'^^^KL!. ! Constable No.735 posted P.B; '^.^s^^h2>/^' In TrafficBranch, Bhilai ^<es^'v"L.. • •G?^t District Durg [C.G.] ~^^ VER S U S RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary -Home [Police], Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur [Chhattisgarh]. 2. Director General of Police Police Head-quarter, Chhattisgarh, Raipur[CG] 3. Senior Superintendent of Police, Durg[Chhattisgarh] 4. Enquiry Officer being the Deputy Superintendent of Police [Crime Branch], Durg [Chhattisgarh]. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2^6/22^OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT ORWRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS: r-' -F XI-HC-22 SiT^T^TT fqiW s^<-tict» tii^a '^-,.il i /•'- ^3f ^WM^, ^^w\^ fa<rti<iy an^r xi^? ^^^m.-Sol/.^^ "^^r""""""""'"""" ^A^TI ^w^tif^a -08.A.2004- Shd.Maniiidra Shrivastava, cour] Slm Yashwant Singli, Govt. .Ael^ Heard. The. pstitioner - is worldng ^| departmental enquin^ on certam chargts that the copies are not bemg sup.plied] petition before tfae State Admiiiistra^ 12.2.1999 lea'iAig it open to the pe| Accordmgly, petitioner made an ap^ application has been r©jected'(Ami€xur4 reMily a\'aila.ble. It is .forther subniittsd that tl-t 24.7.2003 for supply of documents,j Inspector General of PoUce, Raipur ^ orcler dated 8.10.2003 that the petit^i documents. Leamed counsel for tlie pel| 7 and submits that another direction Po3ice. Raipur Range, Raipur vide 01 supply of doeuHients was objected an <<»l<<t<!1<Dl HW^S^^^& <P»<^1< 1fr3?POT3it^T sd for the petitioner. ^ocate for the State 011 adva.n.ce copy. Head Canstable,' He is facing ^s. The grievance of the petitioner is to him. Petitioner had earMer ffled a ve TribunaL which was decided on itioiier to make smtable application. lication (Amiexure P-6). The said PW12) on the ground that fhey are not te petitioner 'made. an application on which has been foiwarded to the nd the Inspector General passed an ^ner be supplied copies of relevant Itioner farther referred to .Asinexure P- ^ ^•|as issued by the Inspector General of 4der dated 10.11.2003 whereby non- p accordingly' it has been directed to' [^^sl^ =F XI-HC-22 ^n^r^RT R<4i5b snisr $r»+iict»^Rd ^ ^ ". ^^/ <v ^ '3^? ^I^IH^ ^^l<i4i<o/ {^<nwy sn^r ^^K ^^.^:..^^^ 'f^w' ^j stii^i ^ww< ^rf^T -^-1 supply th€ documents within a we^l< and his reply should be obtamed and proceedmgs should be contmued. Leamed counsel for the pet|lioner wbjch requii'e mspection of severalj supplied those documents, it would and defend himself. Havmg considered the facts iii the opinion of this court, the dl where from thev are available. Ev^ possible, the petitioner be aflowed to With this observation^ this pel / Consequently, M.W.P.731/2^ C.C, as per mles, cbl^4l'l TW3S^f "9fe^ ^P?R '^3rf3cW3il^ submits that the charges are such documents and-unl.ess-the petitioncr is. iGt be possible for 'hiiii even to give reply ;nd clrcumstances and material on record |).cuments may be r^quisitionecVprocured |n if the supply of th©dociiments is not |nspect and prepare notes on that. |tion is disposed of |04,.I.A.l752/04.also stand disposed of Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^^g^