IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4407 of 2009 Between: Vengoti Ramudu and three others ..... PETITIONERS AND M. Chinna Adenna .....RESPONDENT ORDER: Heard the counsel. 2. The matter is coming up for admission. 3. The CRP is filed as against the order made in I.A.No.1408 of 2008 in O.S.No.525 of 2007 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool. 4. Sri K. Rathanga Pani Reddy, the learned counsel representing the revision petitioners had taken this court through the grounds raised in the CRP and would maintain that since the appointment of Commissioner in the present case would amount to collection of evidence and the same is impermissible. 5. The relief prayed for in the application is for appointment of Advocate Commissioner to note down the physical features of the suit schedule property. 6. In the light of the facts and circumstances and also in the light of the order made by the learned Judge, this court is satisfied that there is no illegality and legal infirmity. 7. Accordingly, the CRP shall stand dismissed at the stage of admission. It is needless to say that the parties are at liberty to file their respective work memos in this regard. No costs. ___________________ P.S. NARAYANA, J September 17, 2009. PN/SMR THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4407 of 2009 September 17, 2009