IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Review Petition No.60 of 2005 in Writ Petition No. 2097 of 2002 Kishor Nandlal Lokhande ..Petitioner vs. 1. The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents Mr.V.A.Gangal with Mr.Harshad M.Deshpande for petitioner. Mr.S.V.Chavan i/b M/s Utangale and Co. for respondent no.4. Mr.A.I.Patel for respondent no.5. CORAM: A.P.SHAH & CORAM: A.P.SHAH & CORAM: A.P.SHAH & Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. 23rd September,2005 23rd September,2005 23rd September,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard Advocates. . Respondent no.5 i.e. society and developer had given offer to provide a shop admeasuring 120 sq.ft. facing the road to the petitioner. The offer was accepted by the petitioner and the petition was withdrawn. Under the circumstances, we do not see any ground to review our order. Review petition is dismissed. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Notice of Motion No. 516 of 2005 in Review Petition No.60 of 2005 in Writ Petition No. 2097 of 2002 Kishor Nandlal Lokhande ..Petitioner vs. 1. The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents Mr.V.A.Gangal with Mr.Harshad M.Deshpande for applicant. Mr.S.V.Chavan i/b M/s Utangale and Co. for respondent no.4. Mr.A.I.Patel for respondent no.5. CORAM: A.P.SHAH & CORAM: A.P.SHAH & CORAM: A.P.SHAH & Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. 23rd September,2005 23rd September,2005 23rd September,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard Advocates. . Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).