IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2011 / 26TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 22344 of 2009(K) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- AYSHA BEEVI, W/O.ABDUL WAHID, AGED 47 YEARS, KANJIRATHINGAL VEEDU, KUTTAMASSERRY. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (LAW & ORDER) POLICE HEADQUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM (RURAL), O/O.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALUVA. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALUVA POLICE STATION, ALUVA. 5. ABDUL WAHEED, S/O.ABDUL KHADER, NOW RESIDING AT CHEMANNATHU HOUSE, GANDHI NAGAR COLONYPADI, ERUMATHALA P.O., ALUVA. 6. M.M.SYED MUHAMMED, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.K.K.MOIDEEN, MARUTHUMKUDY VEEDU, EDATHALA, N.A.D.JUNCTION, ALUVA. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.C.M.CHARISMA ADV. SRI.SHAJI P.CHALY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.22344/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE ORIGINAL PETITION DTD. 25.7.2009 FILED BY THE PETITINER BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM AS OP. 1165/2009. P2:- COPY OF THE PETITION DTD. 31.7.2009 SUBMITTED BY PETITINER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT ALONG WITH ITS ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. P3:- COPY OF THE PETITION DTD. 2.8.2009 SUBMITTED TO THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ALONG WITH ITS ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ ........................................... WP(C).NO. 22344 OF 2009 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 17th DAY OF MARCH, 2011 JUDGMENT This petition for police protection filed as early as on 5.8.2009 continues to remain on file without disposal. The last order was passed on 6.8.2009 and that was an innocuous direction to the Sub Inspector to consider a complaint and to take necessary action. Subsequently, the matter has not been brought up for hearing by either side. 2. The petitioner wife claims police protection against her husband, 5th respondent and 6th respondent, a friend and a transferee of property from the 5th respondent. The learned counsel for the respondents 5 and 6 submits that though matrimonial proceedings are pending and there is disharmony in matrimony, respondent No.5 or 6 have no intention whatsoever to vex or harass the petitioner in any way or to indulge in any violent, contumacious or culpable conduct against the petitioner. 3. We accept that submission of the learned counsel for respondents 5 and 6. We are satisfied that no further directions wpc 22344/2009 2 are necessary in this writ petition. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed. R.BASANT, JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE lgk