^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WritPetttiqn_No._3251_of20U6 PETITIONER : Prabhu Ram Jain, aged about 65 years, S/o Late Shri Pusu Ram Jain, R/o-Kurre (Korrar) Tahsil Bhanupratappur, Distt Kanker (CG). VERSUS RE8FONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Throu^i-Secretary, DK8 Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The Joint Registrar, Co-operative Society, Raipur 3. The Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Society, Jagdalpur(CG) (WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICU 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'Me Mr. Satish K. Agnihotel, J.) Present : ShriSomkantVerma, Advocateforthepetitioner. Shri U.N.S. Deo, Govemment Advocate for fhe State. ORALORDER (Fassed on 30th ofJanuary, 2008) 1. Leamed coimsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was suspended on 18.09.69 (Amiexure P/l) on fhe ground tiiat a criminal case was pendiug against the petitioner in the trial Court for having committed oflfence under Section 409 & 467 ofthe Indian Penal Code. 2. The Trial Court vide its judgment and order dated 12.09.74 (AnneKure P/3) acquitted the petitioner fi-om the charges levelled against him. Even after acquittal, the petitioner was not reinstated in service and his suspension order was not revoked. 3. Being aggrieved, the petitioaer filed an appeal before the Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Soeieties, Kanker, against the District Co- operative Central Bank Limited, Raipur. The Deputy Registrar, by order dated 26.02.91, passed the following order: "3RT: uR|c||(ft wqr cjit f?[®RTf^IT uITm t : i. ^i^t tpr ^fli f^ URl<11<fl ^ S^f^Kff ^ 31^ ^ 4 ^ftcpR feff t ^m ^r f?pn ^ i — ——^' -,>-""W?'3S3;f''**i Sdiu 2. ^rit ^ ft'iS®^> pRff'T r^ TR?IRT ^t^ *l4ttl^l teff uir-n '•^ W TPn 3R: qi^t ^t {3Taw'f f^iw ^ ^i 4 R^"^c; Inrn uira^ ^•H R'll'ct) ^ Wglf ^tf-T, ^iCTir ^cyift qii 'yran ^ l 3. ~^fi ^Q VWR ^f-T tf^n wfe ^ yrer-T 4 ^ ?^t ^iRr uRiciitfl WWT V{ Sff^ft 3RI: f'B ^r ^ ?gpft <3Ti wrei fe aiRichiR-iil' '•^ '^ft tg vsm "iti-yid-"! 4 y*~<ui ^PR feqr uirt uft mm ^ l fe^ do-tft'idi ^ ^m ^i? feiRr sn^ i 4. fNTT ^ <3q aifilcR^ ? cb^^lt'ft I^Rc^ ^?RnT TO^cf 7pn ^ f^q^ R'<)i'n<f cbi4<<i^l ^F^ ig wRlm^t 'wn fNpr q?t fe^ i 5. WTOT "tti-yici-if)') arsi yft f^iir ^rnRT f yRi<ii41 WWT ^rit q>t SRT ^l" 4. Despite the order ofreiastatemeirt aad grant ofconsequential benefit, the District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Jagdalpur, preferred an appeal before tfae Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies at Raipur, wfaich according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, is still pending consideration. 5. In view ofthe pendeney qfthe appeal, tfae District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Jagdalpur, is not complying witfa the order dated 26.02.91, passed by the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Kanker. 6. Be Ifaat as it may, since tfae Distnct Cooperative Central Bank, Jagdalpur has not been impleaded as party respondent here in this petition, no relief can be granted against the Bank. However, the Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Raipur, is directed to consider aud dispose ofthe appeal, in aceordance with law, within a period oftwo moutfas finm the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. 7. With the above direction, the petition is disposed of. No order asto costs. S^. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge T; i" :'\