Criminal Revision No. 16 of 2001 Hon’ble M.C.Jain,J Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and the learned A.G.A. The revisionist is the husband and is aggrieved by the order dated 21.11.2000 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court Pauri Garhwal awarding a sum of Rs.1300/-p.m. as maintenance allowa- nce. Rs. 400/- have been granted as maintenance allowance to the wife and Rs. 900/- as maintenance allowan- ce have been awarded to the three children. The Court below has recorded a finding of fact that the opposite party no.2 is his le- gally wedded wife. In para no.6 of the revision petition, the revisionist/has stated that he is a Government employee and his basic salary is Rs.4500/-p.m. Indeed he must be getting 41% dearness allowance on this basic pay. The grant of Rs.1300/- per month as maintenance allowance to four persons is hardly sufficient to keep them just above starvation level. No interference is called for by this Court. The revision is dismissed. (M.C.Jain, J.) A 26.3.2001