1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.1539 of 2008 (Keshavraj Maharaj Sansthan, Yavatmal .vs. State and Ors.) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. - =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha and Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, JJ. DATE : 22.4.2008. Heard Mr. Amol B. Patil, Adv. for the Petitioner and Mr.Thakre, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. This Writ Petition is directed against the order dt. 22.5.2006 passed by Collector, Yavatmal wherein it is observed that, in the opinion of the Collector, the dispute about apportionment needs to be referred to the Court as per the Scheme of Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Considered the contentions canvassed by the respective counsel. In the instant case, the Award u/s. 11 of the Act is passed and the dispute is only in respect of apportionment of compensation amount. Hence, the impugned order appears to be just and proper in view of the provisions of Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act. Hence, no case is made out for showing indulgence. 2 Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE ssj