IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3084 of 2011 ANKAJ KUMAR @ LALTU @ LALLU KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 15.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Petitioner is neither named in the FIR nor anything has been recovered from his conscious possession. It appears that name of the petitioner came in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. Paragraph-11 of this application reveals that prior to institution of this case; no case had been registered against the petitioner. As per submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, almost all the cases have been instituted against the petitioner after registration of the present case. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Ankaj Kumar @ Laltu @ Lallu Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Murliganj P. S. Case No. 13 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Sri Lalan Kumar, J.M.-Ist Class, Madhepura. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)