1 lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5146 OF 2009 Shri Rahul Namdeo Jadhav : Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. : Respondents. Mr M S Karnik for the Petitioner Mr A B Vagyani, AGP, for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4. CORAM : S B MHASE & R M SAVANT, JJ. DATE : 8th September 2009 P.C. 1. The above Petition takes exception to the order 13.2.2009 passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal by which order the Original Application filed by the Petitioner came to be rejected. The Petitioner was appointed as Servant/Peon by the Respondents. On a complaint being made as regards the said selection an enquiry was conducted and on such enquiry it was revealed that the 4 th standard certificate produced by the Petitioner was not genuine. This was on the basis that concerned School had written a letter to the authority that the said certificate produced by the Petitioner was not genuine. 2. The learned counsel fot the Petitioner sought to contend that the certificate at page No.23 is a genuine certificate and the certificate on 2 which reliance is placed by the authorities is not the one produced by the Petitioner. 3. A perusal of the Application form and the disputed mark sheet indicates that same tally as the total marks mentioned in both the documents are identical whereas the total marks in the so called genuine certificate are much more than one mentioned in the application form. The tribunal has taken into consideration the relevant facts and more especially the letter addressed by the school to the authorities. The tribunal for cogent reasons has rejected the Original Application of the Petitioner. We do not find any merit in the above Petition so as to exercise our writ jurisdiction. The above Petition is accordingly dismissed. [R.M.SAVANT, J] [S.B.MHASE, J]