1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2592 OF 2009 Dharma Atmaram Choudhari. ..Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. ... Ms.Vishranti Navale, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.S.S. Pednekar, APP, for the respondent – State. ... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 17 th JULY, 2009. [IN CHAMBER, 2:40 P.M.] P.C. :- 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in CR No.I-68 of 2008 of Hill Line Police Station, Ulhasnagar. The said case is mainly under Section 395 of Indian Penal Code. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicant submitted that co- accused Subhash Patil has been granted bail by this Court and the case of the applicant is similar to that of Subhash 2 Patil. Hence, she prayed for bail on the ground of parity. The learned APP has not controverted the statement that the case of the applicant is similar to that of co-accused Subhash Patil. Moreover the learned APP, on instructions, has stated that as far as the present applicant is concerned, there are no antecedents. In this view of the matter, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 4. The applicant - Dharma Atmaram Choudhari be released on bail in the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rs.Thirty Thousand Only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount, in connection with CR No.I-68 of 2008 of Hill Line Police Station, Ulhasnagar. The applicant to report once in a week to Hill Line Police Station, Ulhasnagar, till conclusion of the trial. 5. Criminal Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]