IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 11973 of 2009 Between: HANUMANTHU NARASIMHULU S/o. Narasimhulu 15/43 Kota Street Badvel Town,Kadapa District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police Kadapa,Kadapa District 2 The Deputy Superintendent of Police Badvel,Kadapa District 3 The Station House Officer B.Mattam Police Station,Kadapa District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ,order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Hebeas Corpus declaring the action of the respondents in not tracing the petitioners wife namely Lakshmi Devi @ Saroja inspite of lodging FIR No.69/2009 with 3rd respondent as illegal,arbitrary andun-Costitutional and consequently direct the respondents to produce petitioners wife Lakshmi Devi @ Saroja before this Hon'ble Court and give Custody of her to the petitioner and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11973 of 2009 ORAL ORDER : (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R.Varma) This Writ of Habeas Corpus is filed by the petitioner declaring the action of the respondents in not tracing his wife viz., Lakshmi Devi @ Saroja and consequently to direct the respondents to produce his wife before this Court and handover her custody to him. 2. When the matter came up for consideration, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, the alleged detenu was traced by the police concerned and, therefore, nothing remains for adjudication in this matter. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, at the stage of admission. However, there shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ D.S.R.VARMA, J ____________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J 10-07-2009 Msr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11973 of 2009 10-07-2009 (Msr)