HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (W.P. (Art.-227l N0. 7406/2010) PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS N0. 01, TO 03 PLAINTIFFS N0. 04 and 05 DEFENDANTS 4. Smt. Chandani Sharma W/o Shri Raj Sharma Aged About 33 Years; R/o -C-ll, Kamleshwari, Stayam Vihar Navaneet Society Narendra Nagar, Nagpur 15 (Mahaashtra). Smt. Shakuntala Devi W/o Shri Ramakant Sharma, D/o Shri Dullichand, aged about 58 years, Occupation House wife. Kailash Sharma S/o Late Shri Dullichand aged about 45 years Occupation Business. Govind Sharma S/o Late Shri Dullichand, aged about 45 years, Occupation Business. Respondent No. 01 to 03 are R/o Jindal Road, Dhimrapur Chowk, Raigarh (C.G.). Smt. Jay Shree Sharma Wd/o Late Shri Baijnath Sharma, aged about 48 years, Occupation House wife. Suraj Sharma S/o Late Shri Baijnath Sharma, aged about 48 years, Occupation Business. Respndent No. 04 to 05 are R/o Chakradhar Nagar, Raigarh Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.). Smt. Sonal Sharma W/o Shri Ashish Sharma aged about 27 years, R/o APR 63 Katanga Colony Jabalpur (M.P.). Akash Sharma S/o Late Baijnath Sharma aged about 23 years R/o Chakradhar Nagar Raigarh Tah. &Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB :Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Neelkanth Malviya, Advocate for the respondents No. 1, 2 & 3. Shri S.D. Singh, Advocate for the respondents No. 6 & 7. None for the respondents No. 4 & 5. ^)RDER (Passedon 19/10/2011) Y 1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India petitioner has challenged the legality and propriefcy of the order dated 24/9/2006 passed by Permanent Lok Adalat, Khandpeeth 7. :w Kramank -01 (3rd ADJ) Raigarh in pre-litigation case No. 58 whereby Lok Adalat has passed the award relating to property left by Dullichand and Baijnath. Shri Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri Neelkanth Malviya, Advocate for the respondents No. 1, 2 & 3 and Shri 8.D. Singh,, Advocate for the respondents No. 6 & 7 are heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a daughter of Baijnath and was necessary party in aforesaid pre litigation dispute but by committing forgery and cheating they are not made her as a party in such dispute, in these circumstances petition stands disposed of with the observations that petitioner may file appropriate review petition before the Permanent Lok Adalat or file appropriate civil suit and she is also at liberty to prosecute the persons who have comniitted cheating and forgery that too with Court also. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge A ^