1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.06.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P.(MD).No.6698 of 2011 And M.P.(MD).No. 1 of 2011 M.Vijaylakshmi : Petitioner Vs 1. The Inspector of Police Veerapandi Police Station Theni District 2. R.Ramakrishnan : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the first respondent from interfering with the civil dispute between the petitioner and 2nd respondent and thereby not to interfere with petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of her property comprised in R.S.Nos. 683/2, measuring 5 1/2 cents in Veerapandi Village in Theni Taluk in Theni District. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Surianarayanan For 1st Respondent : Mr.S.Govindan Special Government Pleader For 2nd Respondent : No appearance O R D E R Mr.S.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the first respondent. By consent of both sides, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking for a Mandamus forbearing the first respondent from interfering with the civil dispute between the petitioner and 2nd respondent and thereby not to interfere with petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of her property comprised in R.S.Nos. 683/2, measuring 5 1/2 cents in Veerapandi Village in Theni Taluk in Theni District. 3. The learned Special Government Pleader would bring to the notice of this Court that already the petitioner gave a complaint as against the second respondent and that complaint was enquired into. He would further submit that the first respondent has already directed the petitioner to approach the Civil Court, as it was purely a civil dispute and there can not in anyway interfered with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the second respondent and it can only be decided in the Civil Court. 4. Heard both parties. 5. As the matter is purely pertains to civil dispute, it is always open to the petitioner to approach the Civil Court to get necessary relief. Therefore, the Writ Petition at this stage is not maintainable. Further even the complaint has been enquired and the matter has been directed to be https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 agitated only in Civil Court and there is no interference from the first respondent. 6. This Court without going into the merits, dismissed the Writ Petition giving liberty to the petitioner to establish her right before the Civil Court alone. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed. No costs. SD/- Deputy Registrar (LA) /True copy/ Assistant Registrar(C.S) To The Inspector of Police Veerapandi Police Station Theni District +1. CC to Mr.R.Suriyanarayanan, Advocate, SR.No. 20331 +1. CC to the Special Government Pleader, Advocate, SR.No. 20674 vsg W.P.(MD).No.6698 of 2011 And M.P.(MD).No. 1 of 2011 27.06.2011 TR : 07.06.2011 : 2p/4c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/