IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1554 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: December 10, 2009. Ishwar Singh ...Petitioner(s) v. Shri Vijender Kumar & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri Namit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri Narender Hooda, Advocate, for the respondents. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): CM No.28937 & 28945-CII of 2009 Separate but similar replies filed by respondents No.2 and 3, on behalf of the respondents, are taken on record. Civil Misc. applications are allowed subject to just exceptions. COCP No.1554 of 2009 Vide order dated 20.3.2009 passed in CWP No.4346 of 2009, this Court had directed the respondents to take cognizance of the legal notice dated 6.10.2008 served on behalf of the petitioner and dispose of the same by passing a reasoned order. It was further directed that if the petitioner or his family is held entitled to any compensation, the same shall be released forthwith. The grievance of the petitioner before this court was that the respondents have not have taken any action in pursuance of the aforesaid direction issued by this court. In response to the show cause notice issued to the respondents, along with reply filed on behalf of the respondents, copy of office order No.58 dated 4.12.2009 has been placed on record which has been passed by the respondents on the legal notice dated 6.10.2008 served by the petitioner. Keeping in view the fact that the respondents have passed a speaking order and payment of compensation to the petitioner in pursuance of the aforesaid order has been granted, I am not inclined to proceed further in this petition. Rule discharged. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid in accordance with law. December 10, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge