0 t ' k /• c^: F:' :^ tNTHE HIGHCOURTOFCHH^mSGARH BILASPUR FIRST APPEAL iM) N0 f ^ ^ C»=2010 APP€LIANT ; r B£SR3NDENTs r ^ ?f7it. laxml Das ,W^3 SaMia Qas, aged about- 35 years, Caste- Panlka, Occupatioii- House Wife, R/0 Village- Gandhi Nagar, Police Statjon- Gandhi Nagar, Dlstrict- Sarguja (C.G.) VERSUS aakha Das, S/0 Porro Das, Aged About- 40 Years, Occupation- Service (Clerk, Forest Board), Amblkapur, Oistrict- Sarguja (CG.) FIRST APPEAL UNDER SECTION 19 fl) OF TH£FANILY COURT ACT HIQH COURT OF CHKATTESGARK AT BILASPUR F.A.fMS N0. 145 OF 2010 APPELLANT RESPONDBNTS Smt. Laxiiii Das Versus Sakha Das FIRST APPBAL UNDER SBCTIO?^ 19(11 OF THB TAMH^ COURTSACT {DB: Roa'bSe Siui I.M.QuddusieB HonLble Q, Mia^aiuddin^JJ.l Preseiit : Shri Surfaraj Khaii, counsel with the appellaiit SIiri D.N, Prajapati, counsel witU the respondeiit OKALOSU)ER (Passed oa 30th day ofAugiist, 2011) Per I.M. Quddusi. J. Heard on I.A. No.Ol, ibr uautual divorce. 2, Thls is aii applicatk>u jolatly flled by fhe appellant aiid the respondeut for dlvorce by mutual consent. 3. Tlils appeal has t)eeu filed agaiiist tlie judgiiient aiid decreedated 30-09-2010 passed by Judge, Family Court, AiLiblkapur, Surguja iii Clvll Suit No. 12-A/ 2009 decreeto.g tlie suit dlssolving the iiiairiage on the ground that which cast stigma upon the appellant 4. Both fhe parties are present ia person, 5. Siace botii the parties have agreed that they do not waat any stigBia on each oth.er aad learaed counsel for fhe parties have agreed tliat the decree of divorce and fhe fki.dio.gs glven tiiereio. be yet aside aud dlvorc'e by luutual consent bc alluwed. 6. This appeal was filed on 25-10-2010. Learned couiisel for tlie pai'tiGS haye joliitly prayed for conversion of thls appeal treatiiig as applbatk^n for divorce by Biutual consent, settiag aslde tlie decree ofdivorce passed by Cotirt below. .:::^^ a^'- 7. The parties have arrived at iiiutual settleBient aud have amicably decided to get sepai'ated by a decree by divorce with Biutual conseiit. 8. Therefore, we ailow tliis appeal aiid appUcatlon for divorce by iiiutual consent aiid set aside tlie fiiidiiigs giveii by flie leai-ned Court below lii tlie impugned judgBiexit aiid decree aiid also fhe decree is set aside, Botii tlie paities have given tiieir conseut also for fhe folkjwiag ternis: (1) The resporident ~ SakhaDas is ready aiid willing to periiiaiieixt almiony to the appellaiit ~ Laxmi Das to ttie tuiie of Rs. 1,20,000/- (Rupees one Lakh Twreuty Thousand only) under Section 25 oftlie Hmdu MaiTiage Act aiid tlie appeUaiit is ready to accept fhie same. (2) The appeUant 1s willmg to meet her chlldreii who are residing with. th.e respondent. The respoiident is ready for fhe saaie. On iuutual conseut, a date can be fixed aad ihc appeUaiit caii vislt fhe place of flie respondent to meet tlie chlklren. 9. Both the partics dissolved their liiarriage by jiiutual consent, / 10. Pursuant to fhe above concUtions, Bauker's Cheque No.235771 dated 29-08-2011 has been haiided over to the appellarit by tlie respoudeut whlcli lias been accepted by tiie appellao-t. 11. Wifli flie above couditions/decree of divorce by mut-aal consent is passed, Sd/- LM.Quddusi Judge Sd/- G. Minhajuddin Judge Kvr