IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 13443 of 2011 Date of decision November 16, 2011 Joginder Singh and another ....... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ........ Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Rakesh K Dadwal , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. None for respondent No.5. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition has become infructuous. The same be disposed of as such. 2. As ordered. 3. The writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 16 , 2011 archana