IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.729 of 2007 MD.EHSAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 12.9.2008. N.H./ Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This application has been filed against the order dated 16.3.2007 passed by Family Court, Madhubani in M R No.9 of 1995 thereby the petitioner has been directed to pay maintenance of Rs.500/- per month to Akbari Khatoon @ Akbari Begum. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is ready to keep the daughter and maintain her. He never refused to maintain her. However, he conceded that by court’s order, the custody of opposite party no.2 has been handed over to her Nana against which he has preferred appeal before the district court. Considered the submission of the learned counsel for the parties. Perused the impugned order. On perusal of the impugned order, it is quite apparent that there is no dispute with regard to daughter ship of the opposite party no.2. At the time of filing of the case i.e. of the year 1995, she was quite minor. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances, I find no illegality or impropriety in the impugned order. Accordingly, the same is hereby rejected. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )