WP(C) 3540/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.P.KATAKEY Heard Mr B. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mrs HM Phukan, learned state counsel appearing for the respondents. The petitioner, who claims to be the president of the managing committee of the Nama Barghat Moktab School Anganwadi Centre under Rupahi ICDS Project in the district of Nagaon by the present petition has prayed for a direction to th e Child Development Project Officer, Rupahi ICDS Project to construct the buildi ng in the Centre premises on the land that belonged to it. According to the peti tioner, though certain amount was sanctioned by the Government of Assam for cons truction of a building in the Centre premises, an anganwadi worker attached to t he Centre is trying to construct the building over her own land. It appears that the main grievance of the petitioner is against the said anganwadi worker, who has not been arrayed as party respondent. Petitioner has also not annexed the order of the Govt of Assam sanctioning any amount for const ruction of the building of the Centre nor has spelt out the conditions of such s anction, in absence of which no effective adjudication of the dispute raised by the petitioner can be done by the Court in the writ proceeding. Hence, the relie f claimed in the writ petition cannot be allowed at this stage. Petitioner, howe ver, may approach the authorities namely the respondent nos.3 & 4 highlighting h is grievances and, in case such approach is made, the said respondents shall con sider the same and do the needful in that regard strictly in accordance with law . Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.