IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23298 of 2010 SHIBLI MIYAN & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 395, 386 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged that the complainant’s father purchased the land in question and in his share the complainant sown the maize crop and on the alleged date of the occurrence on 25.5.2008 the accused persons came variously armed and took away 600 muns of maize crops. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the case has been lodged as a retaliatory measure since the petitioner side lodged a demarcation case against the Thakurs of the village hence as pressure tactics, the present false case has been lodged. It is further submitted that the occurrence is of 25.5.2008 for which the complaint was filed on 3.6.2008 and the F.I.R. was registered on 5.112009. Considering the background in which the case has been lodged and the nature of allegation 2 which reflects some civil disputes between the parties, let the petitioners, namely, (1) Shibli Miyan @ Shivli Miyan (2) Kaiyum Miyan @ Kaiyum (3) Nayeem (4) Anshar (5) Mansur (6) Juhaur in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No. 91 of 2009 (G.R. No. 1532 of 2009), subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Anand Kr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)