Hl<aH,COURT Or. CHHAT'fJSGARH Al' BiLASPU Coram: Hon'ble Shrl Dhirendra IVJishra & "on'bSe Sh" R.N. Chandrakssr^y vvrix Keij^ori (^) N0.4^1 ^ oy ^yiy Petstioner Natwar Lal Agrawal, S/o Shri Hankishan Agrawai, 3ged about 47'years,R/o. vujage-unargnoaa Dlstt. Raigarh (CG) 1 ani-unargnoaa, ResDondents Vs. 1. 2. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited through Chlef Englneer (CIvl!) BSNL Chhattisgarh Civii Zone, Admin Buiiding, Kh^HihBfdlh, Shanlof NagBf, RBlpur (CG) Supenntendlng Enciineer, BSNL Civd Clrc!©, Shita! CompSex, Te'lbandha, Kaipur ^UU) Executjye pngineer (C) B-SNL Civl! usvision, z'" rioor, n.r\. Nagar, l .j^, BLDG. Bitaspur (CG) Kresent: Shri y.K. binha, counsei for ihe petitioner, Shfi w,s< Murthy, Senlor Advocate wlth Shrl RM Solapurkar, counses for the re^pondenb. URAL ORDfc K (08.12.2010) Learned counsei for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to tite appropriate representation betore the respondents for reconsidering the impugned order dated 17.06.2010, whereby tne petitioner has been debarred from participating in the tender process in BSNL civiS works. 2. Learned senior counsel for the respondents submits that if the petitioner fiies tresh representation aaainst the impugned order, the sarne shait be considered and the order may be reviewed so&ject to imposition ot penalty as per rutes. 3. !n view of the above submissions, the instant petitjon is dismisseci as withdrawn. However liberty is reserved to the petrtioner to file representation against the order of Annexure P-1 before the respondents, who in turn, mav consider the same and oass appropnate orders in accordance with ruies, ~ Pnya Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge