IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.V.SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 789 of 2002 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 26/02/2002 in WP NO : 117 OF 2002 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Kandi Adinarayana Rao S/o.Late Narasimhulu R/o.Kapuveedhi Vizianagaram ..... APPELLANT AND 1 Parumarthi Avatharam S/o.Appalaraju Sri Venkata Balaji Traders Block No.7/5, P.W.Market Vizianagaram 2 The II Appellate Authority under Section 48 of A.P.Shops and Establishment Act and Deputy Commissioner of Labour Visakhapatnam 3 Authority under Section 48 of A.P.Shops and Establishment Act and Asst. Commissioner of Labour, Visakhapatnam .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant: MR.TADDI.NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: MR.E.V.BHAGIRATHA RAO The Court made the following : W.A.NO. 789 OF 2002 ORDER: (Per Smt T. Meena Kumari, J) This writ appeal is filed against the interim order dated 26.2.2002 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in WVMP No. 285 of 2002 in WPMP No. 128 of 2002 in WP No. 117 of 2002 whereby the stay granted earlier was made absolute. The third respondent in the writ petition who was the shop assistant of the writ petitioner was terminated on 26.6.2000 and he filed an appeal along with delay condone petition before the 2nd respondent. The delay was condoned by the 2nd respondent. The writ petitioner filed an application before the 2nd respondent to set aside the order condoning the delay. It was dismissed, against which the writ petitioner filed an appeal which was also dismissed by the 1st respondent. This order was challenged in the writ petition. During the pendency of the writ petition, stay of further proceedings was granted and subsequently it was made absolute. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that the writ petition can itself be disposed of by the regular Bench, if not already disposed of. With this observation, the writ appeal is disposed of. No costs. __________________________ JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI ____________________________ JUSTICE P.V. SANJAY KUMAR Dt. 13.8.2008 KR ........REGISTRAR To 1. 2.2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WA { }