IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11470 of 2010 AMAR NATH GUPTA, Son of Late Bhawani Dayal Gupta, Resident of village – Kauriram, P.S. Mohania, District Kaimur (Bhabua) …………. Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR … Opposite Party ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Akhileshwar Pd. Singh, Advocate For the State : Shaheen Begum, A.P.P. 2 29.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is working as Lecturer in Guru Govind Singh College, Patnacity and at best it could be alleged that he was doing business of financer to the people interested in vehicle. It is contended that he has got nothing to do with the illegal sell of the vehicles. It is further submitted that from the first information report it would be manifest that the transaction was between Singhasan Prasad Gupta and the informant. Learned counsel submitted that his bail application has been rejected by the court below only on the 2 basis that he is accused in other criminal of cases. A supplementary affidavit has been filed annexing the copy of ordersheet to impress upon this Court that the bail has been granted to the petitioner in all other cases. Learned counsel submitted that in the above cases also petitioner was named only due to the fact that he was dealing in the business of financing the vehicle. Petitioner is stated to be in custody since 22.12.2009. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, AMAR NATH GUPTA, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sheosagar P.S. Case No. 235 of 2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with the petitioner. 3 If, after his release in this case, the petitioner is again found implicated in similar nature of cases, then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation then the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)