WPMS 1241/2008 Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Respondent No.1 was not present on 19.09.1997, the date fixed in the case. The Consolidation Officer fixed 17.10.1997 for exparte hearing. The respondent No.1 filed restoration application, which was allowed on 13.02.2008 by the Consolidation Officer, and he was allowed opportunity for hearing in the case. The said order dated 13.02.2008 was challenged before the Deputy Director Consolidation /Collector, Hardwar in Revision No.264 /2007-08, Shiv Kumar versus Ram Kumar and others. The revisional court found that there is no error of law in allowing the restoration application and the rights of any party do not effect. He observed that against the interlocutory order the revision is not maintainable and dismissed the application filed by the applicant (petitioner herein) in limine. The impugned orders do not show that it was passed in disregard of principles of natural justice. The rights of the parties do not jeopardy. Also there is no error of law in passing the impugned orders. Hence I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. (P.C.Verma,J.) 24.07.2008 P.Singh