IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 1503 of 2008 Between: Mopuri Venkatramana Reddy, S/o. Bayanna, Madimuri, Madimuri Post, P.T.M. Mandal, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 2 A.P. Housing Corporation, Rep by its District Manager 3 The Mandal Development Officer, P.T.M. Mandal, Chittoor District. 4 The Tahsildar, P.T.M. Mandal, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or orders declaring the action of the respondents in not considering of the representation of the petitioner as illegal, improper, unjust, contrary and violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court and further direct the respondent to dispose the representation of the petitioner on market value and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 1503 of 2008 Order: The petitioner states that he belongs to weaker section and he is an agricultural cooli. His case is that since his annual income is Rs.12,000/- and he is a white-card holder, he is entitled for grant of house site under Indiramma Scheme. The grievance of the petitioner is that though he made a representation to the respondents for grant of house site to him under Indiramma Scheme, no action thereon had been taken by the respondents so far. Hence, he filed the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. Though the petitioner contends that he made a representation to the respondents seeking allotment of house site under Indiramma Scheme, there is no such material placed by the petitioner before this Court to show that he made any application to the respondents. In that view of the matter, instead of keeping the writ petition pending, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: The petitioner is directed to file proper application before the 4th respondent-Mandal Revenue Officer, seeking allotment of house site under Indiramma Scheme, and on filing such application, the 4th respondent-Mandal Revenue Officer shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 05.03.2008 Nsr ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RLD}