BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Ninth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.10467 of 2011 1 JEYAKUMAR 2 JEYABAL 3 VELU 4 KARTHIK @ KARTHIKEYAN ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 4 VS. THE STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ATHOOR POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT, CRIME No. 164 OF 2011. ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr. V. Natarajan, Advocate, For Respondent : MR. A. RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as A1 to A4 in Crime No.164 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 341 and 302 I.P.C. altered into Sections 120(b), 341 and 302 I.P.C., and the petitioners 1 to 3 were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 16.06.2011 and 4th petitioner was surrendered before the Judicial Magistrate, Mettupalayam on 13.06.2011 and hence, seek bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the names of the petitioners have not been mentioned in the F.I.R. and during the investigation, theses petitioners have been implicated. He further submitted that A6 has already been granted anticipatory bail and A5 has already been enlarged on bail. He further submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for enlargement on bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the names of the petitioners have not been mentioned in the F.I.R. and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ after the investigation only these petitioners have been arrayed as accused. He fairly conceded that A6 has already been granted anticipatory bail and A5 has already been released on bail. He further submitted that the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the occurrence has been taken place on 13.06.2011 and the names of the petitioners have not been mentioned in the F.I.R. and during the investigation only, these petitioners have been implicated and A6 has already been granted anticipatory bail and A5 has already been enlarged on bail and the investigation is considerably over, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchendur and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. Sd 29.08.2011 /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASST REGISTRAR (CS) TO: 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUCHENDUR, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. 2. DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI. 3. THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ATHOOR POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI. 1CC TO MR. V. NATARAJAN, ADVOCATE, SR: 29430: DM::2011:AUGUST:29:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD)No. 10467 of 2011 Dated: 29.08.2011. 2p:7c:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/