IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37956 of 2009 SHEO JEE GOP, Son of late Bharat Yadav, R/o village M.P. Bag, P.S. Ara Nagar, District Bhojpur … Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR …. Opp. Party ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Lav Kush Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Upendra Prasad, A.P.P. ------ 4 26.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code . It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is not named in the first information report. Co-accused Md. Raju, who trying to escape with stolen motorcycle, was apprehended by the persons of the locality. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner’s name has surfaced on alleged confessional statement of aforesaid Md. Raju. It is submitted that co-accused Md. Raju, who was apprehended on spot, has already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court by order as contained in Annexure 2. Learned counsel for the State submitted that the antecedents of the petitioner is not clean as he is accused in several similar nature of cases, however, the cases were of the 2 period 1981 to 1987. However, he could not dispute that the person, who was trying to commit theft of the motorcycle and escape with it, namely, Md. Raju has already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, SHEO JEE GOP, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Om Prakash, Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 108 of 2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with the petitioner. If, after his release in this case, the petitioner is again found implicated in similar case, then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)