THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.29743 of 2010 Date:29.11.2010 Between: Ponnala Uppalaiah and another ..... Petitioners AND The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bhongir, Nalgonda District and others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri G.Arun Kumar Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: AGP for Revenue The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside possession certificate Nos.D/63/2006, dated 04.12.2006, and 6463/2009, dated 17.08.2009, of respondent No.2. I have heard Sri G.Arun Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, and perused the record. The dispute pertaining to Acs.2.34 guntas of land in Survey No.618/e and 618/u is the subject matter of O.S.No.103 of 2005 in the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Ramannapet (for short ‘civil Court’) between the petitioners and respondent No.3. It is the pleaded case of the petitioners that in the interlocutory application filed by them, the civil Court has granted a d interim order of injunction against respondent No.3 and that the suit is pending. The immediate cause, on which, the present writ petition is filed, is that respondent No.2 without any authority has issued the impugned possession certificates. In my opinion, by mere issuance of possession certificates by respondent No.2 would not ipso facto advance the claim of respondent No.3 either with respect to title or possession. The petitioners are entitled to question the jurisdiction of respondent No.2 and also the basis for issuing such certificates in the pending suit. In addition to subjecting respondent No.2 to cross-examination in this regard, the petitioners also can adduce substantive piece of evidence to establish their possession. Therefore, it is absolutely unnecessary for the petitioners to avail the extraordinary remedy of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to question the purported possession certificates issued by respondent No.2, when they have an opportunity to dispute the said certificates in the pending civil suit. Moreover, this Court cannot embark upon the disputed question relating to possession by examining the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the certificates issued by respondent No.2. In the premises as above, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to raise all legally permissible pleas before the civil Court in the pending civil suit against the impugned possession certificates. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.37905 of 2010 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dt.29.11.2010 VGB