CWP No. 21704 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 21704 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: December 14, 2010 Rajinder Singh and others .........PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab etc. ......RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA Present: Mr. GPS Bal, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). AJAI LAMBA, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel contends that the Committee earlier constituted to consider the inter se seniority of police personnel did not consider the issues in proper light of Rules. Subsequently, under orders of this Court a new Committee was constituted. An undertaking was given on behalf of the respondents that all the cases earlier decided would be reconsidered by the Committee constituted afresh. In this regard, learned counsel relies to Annexure P-11. 2. Notice of motion. 3. On the asking of the Court, Ms. Charu Tuli, Sr. Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Requisite number of copies of the petition have been handed over to learned counsel for the respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent-State very fairly contends that since liberty has been given to other persons for reconsideration of the cases CWP No. 21704 of 2010 2 by a Committee constituted afresh, the case of the petitioners would also be considered by the new Committee constituted of I.G. Headquarter, DIG Administration and Sh. Anmol Rattan Singh, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab. The petitioners would be at liberty to file a representation to the Committee within a period of two weeks from today. 5. The findings recorded by the earlier Committee would not influence the adjudication by the Committee which shall consider the cases of the petitioners under orders of this Court. 6. Disposed of accordingly. 14.12.2010 (AJAI LAMBA) shivani JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? 3.