IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4996 OF 2011In APPLN/3912/2011 JITENDRA KUMARCHANDRA PAREKH VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ... Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Gandhi Amol S. APP for Respondents: Mr. S.G.Nandedkar. ... CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. Dated: November 30, 2011 ... PER COURT :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Issue notices to the respondents. Learned APP accepts notices for respondent nos. 1 and 2. 3. This is an application preferred by the applicant seeking extension of time to deposit the amount of RS.14,15,000/- as directed by order dated 26.9.2011 or in the alternative mortgage the applicant’s property with the Credit Society without prejudice to the right of the applicant in accordance with the liberty granted by the Honourable Supreme Court to move this Court for seeking alteration of conditions for bail, if he is so advised by order dated 21.10.2011 in S.L.P. (Cri.) Nos. 7969/2011, while dismissing the same. 4. However, it is implicitly clear from the order dated 26.9.2011 passed in Criminal Application No.3912/2011, copy of which is annexed alongwith present application at Exh. A, that while aaa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD granting anticipatory bail by the said order, it was observed in paragraph No.6 therein that “It is made clear that if the applicant fails to deposit the aforesaid amount of Rs.14,15,000/- with the above referred society till 5th October, 2011, the anticipatory bail granted in favour of the applicant shall stand cancelled automatically without further reference to the Court.” Accordingly, said order is self- explicit. 5. Apart from that, the applicant had preferred Criminal Application No.4440/2011 in Criminal Application No.3912/2011 with the same prayer before this Court and same was already dismissed by order dated 19.10.2011. However, it is pertinent to note that, said order passed by this Court on 19.10.2011 dismissing the application for modification of the earlier order dated 26.9.2011 / extension of time, apparently has not brought to the notice of the Honourable Supreme Court by the applicant, while passing the aforesaid order on 21.10.2011 in above referred S.L.P. 6. Besides, the applicant has not put forth any change in circumstance after dismissing the Criminal Application No.4440/2011 on 19.10.2011. Hence, present application bears no substance and therefore, same stands dismissed. ( SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. ) aaa