THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.11479 of 2005 ORAL ORDER: The only complaint of the petitioner is that on 9.5.2005, he filed a complaint before the second respondent-Police Station against third respondent narrating the way in which he was harassed by the third respondent, but the said complaint was not taken up for investigation. Apart from that, he had also sent a copy of the said complaint to the first respondent under Section 154(3) of Criminal Procedure Code by registered post on 12.5.2005. In spite of the same, his complaint was not registered and no investigation was taken up. A detailed counter affidavit has been filed by the second respondent stating that neither they have received the complaint dated 9.5.2005 nor the first respondent as alleged. The learned counsel for third respondent, however, stated that it is the petitioner who is harassing the third respondent. Be that as it may, the complaint purported to have been sent by the petitioner is filed as one of the material papers in this writ petition i.e. at page Nos.9 and 10. Under those circumstances, without expressing any opinion on merits, the second respondent is directed to treat the complaint dated 9.5.2005 as the complaint filed by the petitioner and enquire into the genuineness of the same and take appropriate action as per law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 8.8.2007 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.11479 of 2005 8.8.2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P.No.11479 of 2005 Date: 8th August, 2007 Between: G.Sunder Reddy .. Petitioner And The Superintendent of Police, Khammam, Khammam district & others. .. Respondents