In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … C.R. No. 7434 of 2009 Date of decision: November 8,2010 Rishi Pal ..Petitioner. Versus Haryana Wakf Board ..Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Punchhi, Advocate for the respondent ... Rakesh Kumar Garg,J.(Oral) The defendant-petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 20.4.2009 passed by the Presiding Officer, Wakf Tribunal Amritsar whereby the suit for possession filed by the respondent-Wakf Board was decreed. Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Ramesh Gobindram (dead) through LRs Versus Sugra Hymayun Mirza Wakf (Civil Appeal No. 1182 of 2006), has authoritatively laid down that the right, title or interest of a non Muslim in a wakf property cannot be decided by the Wakf Tribunal and in such cases only the Civil Court has the jurisdiction. In view of the aforesaid judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent itself was not maintainable before the Tribunal. Thus, no interference is warranted in the present revision petition as the impugned order is without any jurisdiction. The parties are at liberty to avail an appropriate remedy before the competent Civil Court with regard to redressal of their grievances in accordance with law. November 8, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE