IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1392 of 2010 RAM KHELAWAN DAS S/O LATE BALGOVIND DAS --INFORMANT/PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. RANJEET KUMAR S/O NARAYAN RAM 3. MATUK RAM S/O LATE BENGALI RAM 4. NARAYAN RAM S/O LATE RAGHUNANDAN RAM --- RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02 21.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Informant is the petitioner. He is aggrieved by order dated 20th August 2010 passed on Cr. Appeal no. 65 of 2010 whereby the appeal preferred by the informant/petitioner against order dated 03.08.2009 passed in G.R. case no. 482 of 2009( arising out of Parsa Bazar P.S. case no. 23 of 2009) has been considered and rejected. By order dated 03.08.2009, learned Judicial Magistrate rejected the application filed by the informant/petitioner to initiate an enquiry in terms of Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The informant made an allegation that the accuseds/opposite party nos. 2 to 4 herein were released on the strength of forged and fabricated rent receipts. Learned Court below took the view that the alleged forged and fabricated rent receipts not produced or come in evidence. Let it be recorded that the accused/opposite party nos. 2 to 4 herein were made accuseds of bailable offence(s). The appeal of the petitioner also failed. Learned appellate Court concurrent with the view taken by learned Judicial Magistrate. This Court does not find any patent illegality in the order meriting interference. There is no merit in this application, which is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)