IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 5TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 16TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 2963 of 2008(C) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------------- SHYJA, D/O. SREEKUMARI, AGED 36, ANISREE, VAZHAMUTTOM, PACHALLOOR P.O. BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP SRI.V.VIJULAL RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, OFFICE OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, NEYYATTINKARA. 5. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PALLICHAL. BY GP. SRI. I.V. PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ========================= WRIT PETITION NO.2963 OF 2008 ========================= Dated this the 5th day of February 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner submitted that she has obtained Ext.P1 permit for filling up the land. However, when the work started in pursuance of Ext.P1, the 5th respondent has issued Ext.P2 stop memo requiring the petitioner to stop further work. By challenging Ext.P2, this writ petition has been filed. 2. Petitioner complains that even as on date, none of the respondents have taken any follow up action consequent to Ext.P2 and as a result, the entire development work has come to a stand still. If, as contended by the petitioner, action following Ext.P2, has not been initiated or completed, expeditious steps should be taken for the same. 3. In view of this, I dispose of this writ petition directing that the 5th respondent, on whose instructions the same is stated to have been issued, shall complete the proceedings, in pursuance of Ext.P2, with notice to the petitioner, and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE css/