"X ?&/ SW COUKT W CHHAmSSARH _AT_BILA.SPUR n'.r. t isnaSi itri, J. petitioner Respondents Versus Budhr-am Saure S/o t>ashrath 6aure, 32 year-s. R/'o Viiiage MQngrapai, Tehsil- jQgdQipur, Olst: Bostar-(C.©.) 1. State of Chhsttisga'h Through Ths Oepartment of Pmd and Sociol WetfGfe Mantralciva. R Dist: Raipur-(C.6.} 2. The Chief Exeeutive Ofifcsr J Panchu/at Bakawaid, Dist: Bastar-(C.6.) 3. The Additional Collector, Ja9daipur-(C,&.} 4. Tne Sub &ivisionai Officer Jagdalpur-(C.©.) Panchoyat and Socsa! Welfare Jagdalpur, bist ; Bostor-(C.6.) 6. The Swpanch Sram Penchayat Morigrapal Janpud Panchayat Bakaoand, Dist BastcB--(C.6.) Mr.Prafuii Bharat, counsei for- the petitioner. A*is. Sunita Jain, Pane! La»yerfop the State/ i No. 1, 3,4 and 5. Oft&EK (Passed on 14T" Day of March, 2007) 1. &espite service-of notice to ali the respondents, none appears for respondent No. 2 and 6. arned counsel appearinq for the petitioner submits thot the impugned order- doted 22.7.2005 (Annexure P-6) was passed iffithou foltowing the statutory provisions of faw. The petitioner has fiSed an appeoS before Sub-&jv!sional Officer, J<gdaSpur vide Case No. 73/2004-05. The appeol wos admitted, but no stcy granted. 3. Aaainst the •r'efusai1 of stay vide order dated 1.9.2(X)5, the petitioner pr-eferred u revision bsfore the Additionct Coitector, Jagdalpur. The Additiona! Co!lector vide order- dated 26.9.2005 (P-8), dtemissed the revisiori against order- dated 1.9.2305. te that as it may, in the inter-est of justice, »+ien the motter Is )ending for eonsideration since 16.8.2005, it is just and proper to direct the Sub-Divisiona! Officer- to consider ond decide the fi!ed by the petitioner- as expeditiously as posslb!e, preferably wlthin a period of six from the dote of receipt of the copy of this srder. Wi'th the aforesaid di'rection, the petition stands disposed of.