1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 338 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 498 OF 1998 Mr. Ramaswami Krishnan ... Petitioner Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and Ors. ... Respondents Petitioner in person present. Ms. Snehal Paranjape i/by Little & Co. for Respondents. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : AUGUST 04, 2006 DATE : AUGUST 04, 2006 DATE : AUGUST 04, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . In so far as stagnation increment is concerned, on behalf of the Respondent, the learned counsel points out that they are complying with the same and have issued necessary orders. . The Pensioner however, submits that his plea regarding promotion has not been considered. On the other hand on behalf of the respondent, their learned counsel draws our attention to the findings recorded by this court in Para 3 and points out that the issue was considered and answered. . At any rate, the present motion cannot be maintainable. If according to Petitioner, some points which he has raised have not been answered or 2 decided, then he has remedy to file a review. With the above observations, motion stands disposed. (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.)