IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SUNDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 24189 of 2008 Between: 1 B.V.Narasimha Murthy S/o.late Prakasarao R/o.Saahithi Enterprises, Yaddanapudivari Street, Vidyadharapuram, Vijayawada. 2 Javvaji Nagabhushanam S/o.Gangaiah R/o. Flat No. 102, Mythri Towers, Vivekananda Nagar, Ext. Road No.2, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. 3 Javvaji Indira W/o.Nagabhushanam R/o. Flat No. 102, Mythri Towers, Vivekananda Nagar, Ext. Road No.2, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Affairs Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Director General of Police, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 3 The Superintendent of Police, Krishna District, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 4 Mr.Sambasiva Rao Jaggaiahpet, Krishna District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the 4th respondent as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and further direct the 1st to 3rd respondents to conduct an enquiry against the 4th respondent and punish him suitably for the oﬀences committed by him and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioners : MR. T.V.P.PRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.24189 OF 2008 ORDER : This writ petition is ﬁled making certain allegations against the 4th respondent who is the investigation oﬃcer in Cr.No.82 of 2008 on the ﬁle of P.S. Jaggaiahpet, Krishna District and seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to conduct an enquiry with regard to the alleged threats received from the respondent No.4. Since admittedly the said allegations have not been brought to the notice of the respondents 1 to 3, without going into the correctness of the allegations, the Writ Petition is disposed of granting leave and liberty to the petitioner to make an appropriate representation before the respondents 1 to 3, in which event the same shall be considered in accordance with law. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt. 05.11.2008 gbs Note:- CC by tomorrow. (B/O) gbs