HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1900 of 2010 Between: A.Venkata Laxmi …. Petitioner and S.Malli Babu …. Respondent This court made the following: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1900 of 2010 ORDER: The husband of the petitioner filed W.P.No.16063 of 2002 alleging that the Commissioner, Rajahmundry Municipal Corporation has demolished his building in premises bearing No.70-3-36/1, Lalacheruvu, Rajahmundry without paying compensation and contrary to law. The said writ petition was disposed of on 27.08.2002 directing the respondents therein to pass orders on the representation made by the petitioner therein. Consequently, the Mandal Revenue Officer passed an order on 17.02.2002, alloting 130 square yards of land in compliance of the order in the writ petition. For delivery of the possession of the land allotted therein, the petitioner filed W.P.No.5180 of 2009. In that writ petition, the respondent filed counter affidavit stating that the husband of the petitioner was not entitled to be paid any compensation much less being allotted any alternative site at all. The petitioner contends that such a stand amounts to contempt of court. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is true that the respondent has taken a stand, which is contrary to the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.16063 of 2002. This court would have certainly taken note of the same, but for the fact that the basis therefor is the statement made in the counter affidavit in a different writ petition. The court, which hears W.P.No.5180 of 2009, can certainly take note of the observations, referred to above. At any rate, the petitioner can initiate contempt against the respondent only after disposal of W.P.No.5180 of 2002. Hence, the Contempt Case is closed with the above observation. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J December 13, 2010 lmv