1 WP No.3326/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Writ Petition No.3326 Of 2009 Pathan Suleman Khan s/o Iqbal Khan .. Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others .. Respondents. -------- Shri. S.V. Chandole, Advocate holding for Shri. V.G. Sakolkar, Advocate, for petitioner. Shri. S.K. Kadam, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri. V.D. Hon, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 and 4. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE: 5th JANUARY 2011 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The petitioner's grievance is that he is not allowed to work and his proposal for approval is not forwarded. The management filed affidavit in reply. In para 4 the management contends:-- 2 WP No.3326/2009 "4. I say that the petitioner was temporarily appointed as Assistant Teacher by the erstwhile management Soheb Sevabhavi Sanstha and the respondent No.3 New Model Education and Welfare Society has taken over the management of the said school in the year 2004. The petitioner was not regularly serving with the earlier management so also he had not turned up to serve with the new management. On the contrary, he had preferred an application for the first time on 2.6.2008 whereby has applied that in the intervening period his mental condition was not good and now he is in need of service and that the management may consider his application and appoint him as an Assistant Teacher on aided or permanent non aided school. I say that in pursuance to the application of the petitioner dated 2.6.2008, the petitioner was appointed temporarily as an Assistant Teacher in Soheb Urdu High School run by the respondent No. 3 Management in the no grant section i.e. 5th to 7th standards. Hereto annexed and marked as exhibit "R-1" is the copy of application dated 2.6.2008." 3) In the light of the statement made by the management, the petitioner has alternate efficacious remedy. 4) The writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl