MC 1903/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. SARMA (Ranjan Gogoi, J.) Heard Smt. B. Das, learned Central Government Counsel appearing for the applicant and Mr.A. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party/ writ petitioner. By order dated 28.7.2009 passed in W.P.(C) No.1399 of 2005, this Court h ad disposed of the writ petition by directing payment of compensation of Rs.3.5 lakhs each to the families of the four deceased persons. By the aforesaid order, this Court had also directed registration of a case under Section 302 IPC in re spect of the incident involving the death of the four persons and had ordered du e investigation of the same. Miscellaneous Case No.353 of 2010 was filed on 8th February, 2010 seekin g extension of the time to comply with the order dated 28.7.2009 passed in W.P.( C) No.1399 /2005 in so far as payment of compensation is concerned. Though the a ffidavit in support of the said miscellaneous application was executed on 18th S eptember, 2009 and the learned counsel who had filed the same appended the date as 22.9.2009 as the date of filing of the miscellaneous case the same was actual ly presented before the Registry on 8th February, 2010. Be that as it may, in the aforesaid Miscellaneous Application No.353 of 2010, in para-3, it was mentioned- 3. That the applicant’s/respondent’s beg to state that the matter has been taken up seriously by the authorities concerned but as it requires necessary app roval and sanction of the Army Head Quarter and Ministry of Defence, Government of India, which also needs some time, the applicants are not in a position to re lease the amount of compensation within the specific period as directed by this Hon’ble Court. It is pertinent to mention herein that the department has already taken steps to release the compensation amount through their departmental chann el. As the department has to follow some norms, the delay has been caused which is not intentional. In the aforesaid circumstances, extension of six months to enable paymen t of compensation was prayed for. By order dated 8.3.2010, time upto 30.4.2010 w as granted for payment of compensation, as directed by the Court’s order dated 2 8.7.2009 passed in W.P.(C) No.1399 of 2005. It appears that against the order dated 28.7.2009 passed in W.P.(C) No.1 399 of 2005, a petition for Special Leave to Appeal was filed before the Apex Co urt. The learned counsel for the opposite party/writ petitioner has placed befor e us a certified copy of the order dated 11.5.2010 of the Apex Court by which th e aforesaid Special Leave Petition has been dismissed. Notwithstanding the above, the present Miscellaneous Application No.1903 of 2010 has been filed on 14th June, 2010 praying for further extension of six months to enable payment of compensation, as ordered by the Court. A reading of the averments made in the present miscellaneous case i.e. Misc. Case No.1903 of 2010 and those made in the earlier Misc. Case No.353 of 2010 would indicate that all the six paragraphs of the present miscellaneous case are a verbatim reprodu ction of the contents of the earlier Miscellaneous Case No.353 of 2010. The abov e facts would show the highly mechanical approach of the applicant in making the present prayer for extension. The said fact would also show that the averments made in the present miscellaneous case cannot be taken to be even prima facie co rrect as there is no indication in the present miscellaneous case of the steps t aken in processing the matter of payment of compensation after the extension of time was granted by order dated 8.3.2010 passed in M.C. No.353 of 2010. In the above circumstances, we are of the view that the prayer made in t he present miscellaneous case ought not to be allowed. Miscellaneous case is, ac cordingly, dismissed.