IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3860 of 2005 Date of Decision: March 10, 2009 Shiv Mandir Jan Kalyan Parishad (Registered). … Petitioner Versus Nar Singh and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present : None for the petitioner. Mr. Jayender S. Chandail, Addl. A.G., Haryana. S.D. Anand, J. (Oral) It is apparent from the impugned order that the petitioner applied for impleadment as party just because an application filed by him (for the purchase of a part of the land comprising of Khasra No.162) is pending consideration with the custodian. The learned Trial Court declined the plea under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. It is apparent from the record that the applicant- petitioner has not yet come to acquire any title at all in the land in dispute. The question of consideration of the issue of the impleadment is premature and had been validly declined by the learned Trial Court. Dismissed. March 10, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge