A PPEAL OF PRISON E ‘I x x I)!HIIHIIIIIHIW"HIM”!!! “gzlw ea mi «a u/{wokf écl<6(({ vzélkq fw< W ‘0 Residence (J? h Age (7 w» (’ bum \5 04. oktkrgx {CK I'M CLM Sentenced to Name Father’s name‘ Under Section z l meant wzug rid/tame) l h xs explalned to the prlsoner that 1f he states he w1shes to e represented by a legal practmoner the appellate Court W111 not proceed w1th the case for seven days unless the legal practmoner appears earher If the legal practltxoner does not appear wnhln seven “seated days he by may legal not practlttoner heard at all the 1f court the Pnsoner may proceed states that at once he does wrth not the case wrsh and to be W111 repre not e \obliged to giVe a hearing to my legal practitioner who should appear: Date of Applic‘ation for copy of Judgement i _ V Rate on which copy received Date on which Appeal sent . 15L a //v C) $2 Whether the prisoner wishes to be represented or not. W ‘I J u ¢Qel (CK twltq dtLrL LL<t \§Lq<tt2([Qt<t v‘uter3Qatg ) tigether With a copy of Judgement or order passed 1n the case for favour of transmr- ssron to the proper Appellate court. €11.50 w vii: g, ‘ SPU‘” Date of receipt in Office Date of receipt of record to accompany the Memo of Appeal to the Appellate court No Eoarded to the rw 199 Dated Date of receipt‘in Appellate court y' kindly suspend the sentence. y that"‘lihé'" HonwBl‘e" ’CW V, ( b No / f? e! g/zre Name . I to Confined in‘ 5 :nr" Jail . ‘ m “it Q317f< Q (15% \ a ‘ «\gLQe @( . (ézer<<<zg( (M: g) No. Dated / 2 -~ //’ - 199g; Forwarded to the ‘x ”M XLHC— 22 W'W§%@W{ ' $Wm wa visévésém gawk — ‘; ‘rEcm‘bEa EM. Lil i3§méoa c‘mcé ‘ ‘ Hw‘hia Mn bhirendm Mkhm 53“. £2 ~4-2559G6“ Mr. Hamumgn Pmma‘ A9mwa§ Mr, U.N.5. SaagAdéi‘fiomi PL 0m! judgmenf dimmed on ix L‘Ef. N7\ By This - appea} under Sec 5uperim€n€xant Cem‘m! Eaii. Biiw kgaéky and correm‘mess of fha ju‘ \ éafad ‘30fi‘ Ocx‘obery 1938, passad b‘ §n 5335mm Tria§ NQ.136/98, when hais‘ing f’ne acsuged/amaeHa‘rxf guil‘r 3&2 <§ 201 6% $+se E,P.C. senfra'naed %' {ma o”? Rs§90§fhl Er; clafauH’ cw? p03 years amf fa undergo Q1 35w fhr’ae o?’ paymam‘ (2‘? fmz m furf’ner and aaca$e<i Vasudev wag dsza canvicfed m‘ 'fhe I.P,L.. (md senfzmed 1"0 um} Ra.1,0GO'/'w, in dgfaui‘i’ m; paymenf of 9f fh§s uppm§ cm: "mm J Aniiya I Bad (Ema aawgé} was marriaa‘ m i‘ha .accu: \ \ x ,. munsel fer The appeliani‘. béic Prweam‘or for 'iha Smfa/respendw? fion 374 (2) 0f i‘he Cr.P.C.l ‘rhr—augh i‘hg par; appzibm‘ 5hyam‘ Kumar‘ has guesféomiz‘ ‘a’gmerz‘r 0f c'cwk’riancmd order m‘ san‘rema { The .ixééi'?‘ioml 5ess§cns3udgel Jag'hpumagar :by learned Addéféemi Sesgiws Judge a”: C4:xer y' for aommsgécm of Qf‘fance um'er Sam‘ions im To Lmdergo imprismmanf far We anci gay a imen’r Qf fine TD fur‘H‘zei" undarg‘e 5.1 fm‘ ’f‘iva year’s am! pay a finz m‘ QailOQQ/n in defwl? argc: 5E. far nine mam‘ha resgmcfweiy. Cm for cammi‘55iam m‘ offama Lmdar “€26Tkm ZGE; awgc RE. 2‘Qr ’rhree years am} pay a f‘ma m: f§m¢¢ {-uv‘rhar under-go 5E. fer aim rmmhg. A ' 9:21” L C ahmiazm .?: a grk‘.‘ fams {aiming Ta ”film ied/a‘ppeHam‘ cmd i‘hwe were “mm chiidmn cu? \ [@W XI~HCv 22 YW‘ W @Hzv3( ’8% mg .............-......... ‘ mwm , ’ ‘ ' ‘ *1KFWM€IWW‘§R I W; gagjw mmmafw I WWW Q13 i'he wediocik Theremcfar, The accused cmsmd Ahilya Eai fmm his hoi2$e and sm‘x‘ched i‘he a'bc‘uged: Themfaral A¥xi§yczBai fikd some avén ?he chiidrm were by civgl Migwjan agging? €‘E—1e accusad in fvhe Cgur“? af Eashpur zmd‘ (1a par ‘E‘ha 8a; gitwfad Af‘orking wi‘H’: 8himamnd Ng‘i'h (¥’W—3) m om‘er pmsecu?ian c&$g, Ahélya i‘o ‘ear‘n momv 1%.h1ifigafien. Furfhem casé 3f fhe pm$acufioa gs. ‘rhn? cm (34—98, +hr 32.% I’d wan? f0 fhe muse of B? ImamExdV fer bringing h§$ wifa AhiWu Q‘s} whkvsh k - Bhimmm‘m wke‘i 'i‘he a¢cu£ea io em‘er Moi a campmmise and Thar-gaffer miy, ha hmm $4953, a wrii‘i'en compromse wag enfared ima ws‘ ‘ ml! sam§ Ahi!ya wiih Q'rs ‘r‘aémm‘fér’ 1‘ha cxcgused‘ ”funk away ; ndya WM? ’rzim W’nm one Ash5k Kum’rr mm ' gamg m Ja$hpur from Tha ymage c‘ parems of Ahilya paaenxs cf Ahhya askad ‘fhe Ah‘lya, an which rza ‘ro Bmmanmd am hm i‘a enqbire dbmn‘ waif-bemg pie“ Ah‘lya, wam Then Bhiimanand mfeEmed him fEai‘ ‘accgged Shyam Ku-mar‘ haéi mken Ahilya wii‘h' Mm. Ashok Kumar mfarmad_ fhe pwemfs of Ahiw‘a fhm‘ AhEEya had u%reédy baa". - Taken‘by Shkm. Kuman bu? *(he w%erea§cu?s En“ Shyam Kumar & Ahii‘ya‘ are no? knawri, or; which fhe par-enw and grmdfai‘har‘ La! Bahadur (PW-2) of The decaasac! Vsmr‘fad. Eb amrcbing searching Ah§!ya; ~Eor fhan AhHya; he saw On ‘fhL‘ 16-4~§8‘ we‘dag whan‘ was La! em‘mg Bahadur a kg wem‘ m‘ human f0ward3 béérag rivm‘ zim‘ fge‘ bcéy was buried under fhe s d, Hi3 grahd7daughf2rs Kusmefl & Sanmczfi: ' a‘f‘mw seeéng fhe do’rhm, Said ‘fha? We EIG’rhes are Hka AWE/ck c’n which Lohari Sui, usmie 3f Ahiiyé, was askd is limiar‘ id i‘ha Poiice and he‘gave ”the reperi’ (EgFn’é) in Pgiice $‘ia‘i‘isn: Kansabeii i ‘ V Raceiving‘ihe raperi (EX.P,_ ), ‘ihe Siai‘ian Heuga Officer iew‘i‘ far river Ib V mid in pr'wenca of Sanchas, ‘i'ne b0 'ywag exhumad arid inquzsi’ mii‘azii‘ Ex‘P-4 was [tfr% W ‘ ;¢\ XI—HC—22 ' ()A mmmw - WWIEFE‘ém %7a1f?man%$r xP-E) which mm enfared bamaen fhea accwaci an uwar EXP—2 fmm Bhiman‘cmd. C(3-accused re memeram‘ium Ex.P~6 regaré§ingi¢he spaéé cmd hich wa$ used ‘iar‘ burying fhe bmdy was T'aken gr ar‘rides mgmiomw m Ex.P—3‘w3re fakan Mm :ar Exixg, pmm egoi! arxd bloosd swima‘ soil ware 3iace of occurrame. Si‘re piari Eg.P:1O was 3am formsf—mor‘ram examina‘i‘iw ‘rc Primary Dr, Sm‘i. Kimn Karkaii‘a (PW-10) cci’aduciec‘ aared ‘fhe pGS'i-mar'iem"repori‘ (Ex.9~11}. She r'i'ai‘n as i‘he botiy i3 excessive pufrefieci. ‘Ti‘te. 3? Paiiée Sfaiicm Tapkam. Deha‘fi Naiishi ExxPV 15 was recorded on 17~4-‘§8. Sife FEMI‘ Infarmai'ian Repay“? (ExPwl‘; wifhw? number md fhzn sama wa 3G2 & 201 m‘ ‘i‘he IRC - A‘Ffar campie?im of inves? Kumar‘ in Ms absence a$ also agains an 118-98 afier fiiing 0f charge shee‘i‘ in ‘i‘he Cauri‘ of Chief Judicial Magiefra’le, Jeel‘ipurnagar: who in‘lurrc cammii’lel‘l fhe case "ré ‘lhe 5essiei1$ Judge Raigarh, fie-em weere, learned.Addifienalfyeesiens Judge, Jashpurnagar, received fhe caee ‘ean ‘rmms’fer for friai. o " preparad The campmmise dead (E arid AhHya wasrmken énfa passeSs ‘ Vasga‘ev, wMg in paHce cusr'roa’y, ga I in purwance of That ’rhe spaciaw ‘ infa p'asswsian gmcf'er EXP-7". 01h ¥0§5é5sion fmm ‘fhz r‘iverbed. 'Unc‘ > faken Wm éasgwsian' T’mmWhe pmpm‘ed. Thg bcdy af AhHya was ‘ Heah‘h CwWanFerwbahar, where p03€umarfam an f'he body and pre Gpinad fhaf cause m“ daafh'is Lmcé ca3a was regw‘fereci Lmder EXP-13 piam ExsPww & P46 war-e aim prep§rad. The. ’) wag regisierad m‘ Pei‘icez Si‘afion: Kansabei i 'crwardaé ’ro P¢lice Si'a‘rion: Tapkam, Wham reeuiar FIR. (EX.P~13) was r‘egis‘ier‘ed far eemmiseion ef‘affence under Sem‘iens gafian, charge 3hee? was fiiad againsf Shyam i Vasudev. The accused pereans were arreefed [113% W‘ ‘ x XI—ac-zz 3a WE, m ma? Wm WWG> .....fx 27$ w WWW W fem.wag ‘smmmm WM&NW %3W1a11%$1 The pmsecu‘?i0n m arder fa ambiésh charge agdr’ts? fha agéused perscmg ,_ examihed 14 W‘Hnesses, Sfa‘mmenfs 3f fhe amused persons were recordeti uhder ‘ Eacfion 313 of 1‘he CrRC. m whic} fhey denied a” fhe evidenee or ma+er§al appearing agains? Them in i‘he‘wasacmion evig‘ence and s’mi‘ed The? i‘hey are ‘ imocehf and #hey have been falsely mpHca‘red m The crime. V" Leamed AEdif§6hel 5e$si<ms ‘ paWies, canéicfed and sen‘f‘enced '%h This judgmem._ We have heard Mr. Hanuman Pmmd Agrawai‘ learned counsel 34w Vihe appellan'i land Mr. U.N.5. D380, learned Addil‘icml Public Pmsecufor cm behalf m‘ ‘ i‘he Stai‘e/re5panden?‘ Mr. Hamman Phased Agramel argued Then” in i’he firs? place‘ .ihe ‘ prosecu‘rian has no? been able 1'0 esi'ablish wi‘lh legal ahd clinching evidence iha‘i lelc‘i‘hes‘based on which we body was said lo have been idem‘rfiea were he? l by The ‘i-mcd ”our? Na we? iderhncahcm pwade we canducied m arder’ lo find om” fhai‘ ihe cio’rhes wmcn were fourd 0n Viha ”Ody, were QT deceasw Ahliya i c‘mchmg ewdeme fa shew fha‘? fhe c ‘fur‘hher submif‘wd fhai‘ Therefare‘, fhe judgmanf 0f“ 1‘r’ia! 50w“? is erronews am‘ iha same is Eiab¥e ’ro be sef asid‘e. V oh {he gerher hand; Mr. u.N.‘s‘ ‘ The bedy which was exhumed fmm ‘ ‘%anderad Em‘o evidence and exhibh‘e ‘Eudge afi‘er haaring counse! fm‘ respechve g accwad gersonwas mahl’ionad m para 1 0f He aiao arguen Tha?‘ mere m no lega! and cameo” cammiffed fhe murder- of‘ Ahilya. He Dec supper-Ted The judgmem of Mal Cam, {11%W ~ ...... ‘....................................... 1mm .......................................; ........ ¥ ‘he riverbed of Ib was of Ahilva Eve1 fhe XI-HC—ZZ WWW §®W :ksqfaqm Having heard iaamed cf: avidanca and *rhz judgment 0f fr ' tiéraa'r cmd acuiw evidenca h c§rcumsfamia§ evidema. z§s per 0E‘%ircums1‘o.n‘riai avic§ence, H L faiiawing points: — ’ . fha circum£fances from § mus? be gogenfky and fir? 2. ’T'nase ciréumsfénces shoL mwards guiH‘ of ‘i‘he accu 3‘ *rha’ circumsfamzs, ’i'ake Thai! mew §s no escag probsb$li1‘y Wasrima was 4. we circums‘mnfiai evider anc§ incapa%;le of explanm G’F ’rhz accusadaéwd suck u'nich an inference {if guii‘i‘ is saugh‘i f0 be :immm, 31y es‘mbiished: id be 0f a definii‘z “renda’ncy unzrringiy poin’ring sad ; ) 1' cumuim‘iveiy,’ ghouid fonm a sham so co'mpiem >en‘mm fine canciuéion fhm" “wi‘r‘nin (xii humm csmmi’riad by 'i‘ha diseased and ncme eisa; and ‘ c2 in ardar Ta susfciin bonvim‘ian mus? be wmpief‘a ’ion m‘ any afhar hypsfh‘esis i‘han fha’r of fhe guii? evideme $houid m? ahiy be consisienf wii‘h ‘i‘he - . guiH of fhe accu3ed bm‘; Appk/‘mg the above rpr-ii presecu‘fion has friad w cenr T‘cHawmg c'imums‘mmes: - 1. fhM‘kfhe bcdyxsf. AM deceasaé; Lmsei fer ‘§‘ha parfies, we have s‘cmfi‘nized fha fa! Caum‘. if igladmh"?ed po$ifion fhgf mere is no T'na wh¢ie case resisr on fhe ‘rm sawed law, in order “5'9 res? conviwion based ‘S The du‘iy 0f ‘i‘he prose§ufion 'w e3fabiis'n fi’ia 1 ‘i‘his casa. :hould be incansi5‘?em‘ wifh his irznacénce. ncipia, we have scrm‘inized fha evideme‘ The iecf The accuszd wi‘i‘h fhe crime basad an ‘ihe {a was Videh‘i‘i‘fiw based or: ihe cia’rhes ai‘ “the [113%éiia73 ’ / - / / Mm‘g ‘ Fm? cirwmSWme: u V ‘ As far as fhe firs? circums‘ @W-lO) kw s’ra‘md in her avidanca ‘Prirmry Heaifh §en%re, Farsabahar, *mcr’fem examihafian and on exferna ’in pufrm‘ied s?age. Eye balis we detached from ‘ihe banes over neck, VHmb absem‘ fmm hip Jain“? all over 1"! ‘sgen any viden‘? sign ovar fhe body” 'naar' abou? 10 f0 12 éayg. Therefo: ‘i‘ha'i i‘he body was ii? iden’ri‘iiabie candmm Fveii m para l or ner zi/idence shz has fame is cenéarned, Dr: 5am. Kimn Kerke‘i“m “rha‘? m 18-4-98‘ when she was wsrkmg in bedy af Ahiiya was bmughf To her for m3?— ¥ examina‘rwn, if was feund ‘fha‘i’ fhe bady was me pufrefied, mom'h closed, Skin & muscie face, upper limb and iower iimb. Righi iswer ie body. Sand mixed. §ody is pai‘r‘efied so no? Hair is defached, Time pqssad since deaih “e from The above evidence i1“ cannai be said / ‘ \‘ XI-HCv22 3E WWI, mg, W3? m é T Q . m ....._.............. am q? Wm mm mmmw 'W 3‘;W afeaq "& m Tiara?W 2A fha‘h ihz deceasad was iasi‘i seenhiive (m ?:4-98 Wii‘h ‘rhe accused Jus‘i befcre fine c‘ammiss'ian af cf'iima: and 3 3i ‘E‘ha’r, ’rhe accused absconded jusi' afier “ii-1e mmmission of crime and he was arres‘ied only an 17-8—98, ‘ XI—HC-QZ. mM—Tm’frwm émtwqma . w his gwdame regar§mg The éczc‘J fhq’r fhe bow wa3 §éenf§fied M ”(he Basis of deme$ cu he? I? was m xdarmfxab 1E condmcm. Lai Eahadur (PW-2), grandf I%har- 0f éhilya, haé sm‘red m his avi‘dancé fhcfr pram" MwQrds frhe river m seardn a‘f AhHya amd when May reacheé fhe mver *heyl saw rfhaf am deg was eating (may ‘i‘hz legaf a s huramx be‘mg. The mciy was mside 1‘hz scmd. His gramddaughférs Kusman & 3anma‘fi ware whh him am} m1 $eé1ing “the dofha 3“§m'y Sam? Thai“ fha c‘;o?he5 avg. like our AhHya< w’hgr‘em‘Er he he ahm mm hi” arawéidauqmers ‘ wen‘? To fhz viliaga/ infarmed fha \I‘Elkrgers am"; Lohar m wits gen? “car! lodgm§ +he répari ‘sm‘hér (31‘ #‘na decawed, and La£ Bahetiuv (PW— R‘m‘cznmm Kherwar (PWni), h§ve sm‘red in TheEr ev§c§amce Vmaf’BhEmcmmd a !e‘??er Thai” Ahi§ya has twaem faket1 by fhe Na??? (?‘ai‘—3) iafarmed~fhem by [agcus:evd. But 'fhcri‘ iei‘wr hag m? been fandered info evédence mad bofh Thesa Mi‘messea %mvé é‘é‘a?ed ‘fhcrr baiEg #Ehfam‘rzg May were no? ama 10 mam The i2'H‘6r #ered Gpmmn Tha? The wagecurim Hcw uffer§y ‘Tha‘i: the. bady, wh‘ch was exmxmed from ‘rhé 2}, grandfa‘rher e{ fhz c§ecease¢ ' ‘ merafwe: we are (3f ‘%‘he consu “faHacé in.5émb%§$hmg ’r'né fan? riverbzd, wa5 9f Ahayg, €aww§ “rams mma ~ A” far as fh£s cwmrnsfahce £3 camerned, Ehimgmnd Nam (PW~3) Hays smmc£ m his avlcéance Tha? on 7-Jé-9$ :2? abau? 9 am‘ accused Shyam Kumar‘ mma anti affer'execu?ian cf we canj‘ Shyam Kumr. ,Ehagwan Tr§paThi (PW-‘5) ha$ mKsG [omgromése dead (Ex.?~3) waswri§¥ery and AhiEya ‘H >. \.\ I pmmise dead Ah§§ya was 59m wi’rh Mm: as cm aaquiry sha was wiHmg m g0 wi’rh ' wafed m hit: evidence fha’r ’rhe £ [agaraa \j s XI—HC»22 mm#mna‘f f€?%m $Wmm was sen? wifh 1‘he accUSeé whc’ iwi'H keep her- comfarfably. The were mus? be cieee proximi‘?y wifh “rhe circums‘i‘ances fhaf ihe deceased was ias? fseen aiive'in ‘i'he company of the gccused and'crime was cammii‘i‘ed In fhe maiden of SGDHRAE’ AHA5 EODHA r-‘Whe ihecry of ks? seen comes info piay where The A and fhe deceased were seen ins? alive and when “H'ie deceased is feunc dead is so smaH ma? possibiiify 0f any persan cfher v Even if fhe evidence of E is accep+ed, ‘fhen Ahi!yd & Shyc was found on 1é~4-98. Therefore, fher’e was a gap of nine days. As per fhe medical evidence, fhe body, wh fime—gap bafween”he pain? of fime when fhe accused 'i‘he crime heceniei gur‘rhar held fhaf: The Hon’bie Apex Cour? “if wouM be hazd in cases where 'Hr conélude Thar} fhe‘ ‘sgen fogefher‘.“ ”Ia we ma‘rfer of Subh}. {2902} i §upreme 5mm“? Cages '“ ..... To cmwfi‘fu‘m evidence mus? 'd Cir-awn firm? fhe gave aswmnce ‘i’ha? he would n0? bani“ her and he sa?fied Saw in respec‘r‘ af iasi‘ sezn ‘l‘heory is fhai’ AMD 0THEK’5'vs STATE @F JAMMR} AND E£$5HM1E reporfed in (EOQQ) d 5C6 45, fhe Apex Cour? held fhaf: khan The accused being Tha aufhor‘ of ; impossible.” "dous To came ‘ro a'conclusioa 01‘ guil‘r ere is ha ofhzr‘ posi'rivz evidence 1'0 ézccused and fhe deceasw were, iasf ash Chem vs. 5iafe of Qajasfhan rapor‘ied m 702, ihe Apex (bur? held Thai; evidence of lasi' seen foge‘i‘her" ihe afinifeiy permi‘i an inference being vicfim and ‘i’he accused were eeen himanand Nafh (PW-3) & Bhagwan Tripa’rhi {PW-5) m Kumar' iefi‘ on 7-4-98, whereas fhe aileged body ch was exhumed fncm The riverbed, ’rhe deafh. (if [View fogefher a? a pei 11‘ of fime in ciose proximify wi‘rh The ‘rinie and dafe of commission of crime..." Xi—HG22 mmwm e1 egg . W. ' wwwiiw avaW-m There is no ofher ev§dence which §né efare., But apem‘ from fhe abeve evide‘nca, &mwn fhnf i‘he bady wa$ (3f Ahilya fhe crime in ques‘iiori. As per $eé‘hri evideme f0 conciude Thai ihe-accus at‘i‘he iime of‘crime, i? willbe unsm: ih‘e crimé only on ‘ihe basis of km? record iher‘e is rm o‘rher‘ canckmve umwn fha‘i‘ The accused affer 1“ Therefore, merely on fhxs circumsfc ciifficuif fo conneci‘ i’he accuseci wifi‘ Théré eircumymncg: ~ As far ‘ihis circums‘rance fruck Kaiesi/ as per his Job he is re remain a? his residence or village. r313 of i'he Cr.P.C. denied ihe presec lie quee‘iien Na? iha‘l‘ ihebedy of fha‘l‘ he does nef know wha‘r happen: prasecufian evidence Thaf 'ihe acu abeu‘i‘ faur mon‘i’hs in arder 'i‘o es ‘Wifhoui any pash‘ive evidence Thai" descended 'l'ill he was arresi‘eci and ' inference cannot be drawnirha‘f he fhaf person, oecurred 10-12 days iedfes or Th‘rough which any inference can be cine Thai" feo, The accused was i'ne au‘ihor of zj's case {were} if ihere is no oiher posifive ed and The deceased were las‘r seen fogefher e and hazardeus fa conned lhe accused wi‘ih seen Theory. From 'ihe eviclence available cm evidence ihrough which an im‘erehoe can be :xking ’awcy Ahilyo commi‘H’ed #he murder. nce wifhoul’ any oiher posihve‘evidence, if is i The crime in ques‘lion. is concerned! fhe accused by profession is a quired m move wiTh ihe “truck and he coma? The accused in his sia‘i‘emeni‘ under 5ec’rion men evidenc‘ei‘appearino againsf him. In reply Ahilya was found on The riverbed/ he replied ad io Ahilyal he remains ou‘l‘side. There is no sed disappeared or renioined absconded for cape from nrresf in ihe crime in ques’iiom Thehaecused deliberai‘ely escaped and remain i'ha‘l merely The accused had no? appeared, remained obsconded in order i‘o escape from 0. [mew WW, mane ‘Faemm We?! W Qg Xl-HC—22 W mm (5) Z73( qg WW . .............................................m ........................................... $mfm3=vmtEwm %aqi%1{ mm scussmw we are o The consnjer‘ea aptmm Wa? m connecf fhe amused mfh crime m ques‘hon aufhor' of fha cr‘h’na in quas‘i‘ion and mere is; n0 pogsibmfy of coming of any fhirc accused Shyam Kui’nar‘ succeeds and ihe same is es impoeed Lipan The accused/appe‘lan‘i under fms Circum€rahce ms dsa no? been esfcb whed f'ne crime in queg‘i'ian‘ Therefore ’rhai' fhe ascused abscméw in orc‘ er f0 éscapafr‘om "the crimg. ' In vfem; of f'ne faregoing d fhé .pr’osewfiom has LrH‘erly failed ba5ed on fhe circurnsfan+ial ewdance and rhaf ‘rhere is no pesmvg ewdence m indiéife grim? 1*he'accused was fhe person in beiweeni Therefora, convic‘iion and seniemes impwadw upon fhe accused/appeiianf under Secficms 302 & 291 of fhe IRCZ cannof ba sus‘mined. In ihe resuif fhe appeai 0‘: allowed Convmfion and semam gee‘iians 302 6; 701 of fhe 1 PC are aef Side arid he i$ acquH‘ied m‘ said charge ' He 9e 33: a1“ iiber-fy forihwifh‘ if no? required in any oiher case. Pariies are en‘iiiied for ce~fified copy of ‘ihis order‘ _ sul- L L.c.BHADoo Judge [113% efea f