IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33700 of 2008 1. BAM BHOLA YADAV 2. DANI YADAV 3. MANOJ KUMAMR 4. NAGESHWAR YADAV 5. UPENDRA YADAV 6. SUBHASH YADAV 7. OM PRAKASH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 24.10.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a case under Section307and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code. It appears from the record that prayer for anticipatory bail of some of the accused persons was earlier rejected by this Court in the year 2006 on merit. Case of her petitioners is also similar. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to reconsider the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Accordingly, the same is hereby rejected. The petitioners are directed to surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail. In that event the court below shall consider their prayer on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. It appears from bail application particularly paragraph2 that wrong statement has been made that earlier no anticipatory bail or regular bail was filed before this Court. However, from the record it reveals that prayer for anticipatory bail of some of the petitoners has already been rejected earlier by this court on merit. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that - 2 - due to mistake wrong statement has been made in paragraph 2 of the bail application. When it came to knowledge a supplementary affidavit to that effect has been filed and he also expressed regret for the mistake committed by him. Under the circumstances no action is required to be taken against any of the person. B.Jha (Ghanshyam Prasad)