IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7082 of 2010 PRABHAKAR MISHRA SON OF LATE KASHI NATH MISHRA RESIDENT OF MOHALLA SHEKHPURA FLAT NO. A/33, 3RD FLOOR BLOCK A IN JAGAT AMBIKA APARTMENT P.S. SHASTRI NAGAR, DISTRICT PATNA. Versus 1. THE PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK BRANCH OFFICE PATNA R.T. BHAWAN PUNAICHAK THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER, P.S. SHASTRI NAGAR, DISTRICT PATNA. 2. THE PUNJAB NATIONAL BACK CIRCLE OFFICE CHANAKYA TOWERS THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER, R. BLOCK P.S. SACHIWALAYA, DISTRICT PATNA. 3. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, PUNAICHAK BRANCH, PATNA. ----------- 2 23/04/2010 Only reason why the petitioner has filed this writ application he says is that the accounts and the outstanding dues which has been worked out by the respondents Bank does not reflect the true state of affair. Respondent Bank would be well advised to furnish correct statement of accounts to the petitioner. If the petitioner is so interested, he may approach the Bank for settlement of the dispute else the law has been set in motion. It may be also clarified that the dismissal of this writ application will not come in the way of the petitioner for invoking the alternative remedy which may be available to him which has been invoked against the petitioner. - 2 - This writ application stands dismissed. AMIN (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)