iv IN THE HIGH COURT OE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. No. -—44—/2003/ Mohd. Janib Khan, S/o. Jameer ALI, aged about 32 years, ecretary of Gram—Panchayat, Badwar, Pratappur, Distt.— Surguja (C.G.), R/o. Pratappur, Distt.—Surguja (C.G.) ié @2a PETITIONER - VERSUS TS :w/State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat Departmen D.K.Bhawan, Raipur (C.GL) z” ' r I 2. Collector, Surguja Ambikapur (C.G.) Gram—Panchayat,QQ&D@&{Wm@&¢£§% Tah.—Pratappur istt.—Surguja(c,G,)¢¢ J .‘L g D SB PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/225y3;”y CONSTITUTION OF INDIA V PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER : AS given aboveWEause title. ‘ §§ PARTICULARS OF TUE RESPONDENTS : AS §$ given‘aboveW‘auSe title. r N t } Q w?‘ Imzz a; WW m 200 ‘mm (W) WW WW $3fmemé¥i CE 'i,....L V “. ..’..1 W 2. Wmm = ' ON' E. _ 25.0?,2011 Shri J. K. Shastri, cunsel for the petitioner. Shri N. N. Roy, P.L. for respondent Nos.1 & 2. Shri Sudhir Verma, ounsel for respondent No. 3. The present petitin has been filed challenging the resolution dated 1.01.2003 passed by Gram Panchayat, Badwar, istrict sarguja which was confirmed by the Gram Sbha, Badwar on 23.01.2003. In the return filed - the respondents it hag been submitted that subseq ent to the resolution, the termination order has ben passed on 30.01.2003 vide annexure R-l but th said order is not under challenge. In view of this clvelopment, counsel for the petitioner wants to withraw this petition with liberty to file an appeal before t e S.D;O. He further submits that as the petitioner as wrongly prosecuting this petition beforethis Cou , the appellate authority i.e. the S.D.0. may be dire ed to decide the matter in accordance with law. Permission granted Accordingly the petition is dismissed as U I wwwm,F n4 2011 , 0,0. U I ' u u n XI—HC—78 W mmw’mw" wt zoo mm (Wu) mmm appeal before the appella1 from today and in the e appeal along with applica the same would be decide in accordance with law petitioner was prosecuting this petition before this Court. WW Wm %3if?man%$r :e authenty within a month 'entuality of filing any such on for condonation of delay by the concerned authority keeping in mind that the Sd4— Pritinker Diwaker Judge