1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.101 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Coram: Naresh H. Patil and Shrihri P. Davare, JJ. Date : 22.11.2010 1. Heard Shri R.N. Dhorde, learned Advocate, instructed by Shri S.B. Jadhav, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri S.K. Kadam for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Shri V.D.Hon, Advocate for Respondent No.3. 2. The petitioner challenges the action of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Bhusawal, of levying market fees and supervision fees on edible oil, ghee and sugar. 2 3. Learned counsel for Respondent No.3 has submitted that that the issue involved in the present matter has already been settled by the Division Bench of this Court at Principal seat at Bombay, (Corum: B.H. Marlapalle and D.B.Bhosle, JJ.) by judgment and order passed on 16.6.2006 in Writ Petition No.6205 of1996 and connected matters. Learned Counsel further submits that the same issue in some other matter is taken up before the Hon'ble Apex Court wherein Special Leave Petition is admitted, however, there is no stay to the view expressed by the Division Bench of Bombay High Court in the aforesaid judgment. 4. We have perused the material placed on record, the affidavit in reply and the order 3 passed on 16.6.2006 by the Division Bench of Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No.6205 of 1996 and group of connected matters. (supra). We do not find any convincing reason to take a view different than the view which is adopted by the Division Bench in above group of Writ Petitions. 5. There is no merit in the petition. The challenge raised to the power and authority of the A.P.M.C. must, therefore, fail. Petition is accordingly, dismissed. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) ((NARESH H. PATIL, J.) pnd/wp101.08