^^rg^ ^^^s'^---"'"" ytese A*e*-- .***" IN THE HIGH COURT OP JUDICATURE AT BILASFUR (C.G.} WRIT PETmON. N0. /^/ OP 2006 BETWEEN M.L.Sonwani S/o B.L.Sonwani , aged about 44 years .occupation District Education Officer (presently suspended) posted at Rajnandgaon,resident of Street3-C F>ragati Nagar, Risali Bhilai, District Durg (CG). ^^o^ !3^u^il ^ £sm3SI<ffi ^ ^. G. ^^ E 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Thrpugh the Secretaiy <^ Department of School Educafion , Mantralay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) ,,2. Director, Directorate of Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh, Pension Bada, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (CG). RESPONDENTS "y WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE '226 f227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA r XI-HG-22 SII^T^! . R-iidi sn^ ^RW^fttT ^ f' S&^A. '^!^ 'S^ -^WKiy, 8T!i'y'IS, fa|<?ll«y v HI*<PlTWHrai ^.^.^tl 3ff^i?^nwfff^r ^^icraH ^Mdf ^ fs^ '^f^T^R ^'aiNtiaii^r 2S-4-200S. Mr. S.K. Thomas, counsei fo thepesaoner. piaced under suspension on the which he was appointed as Officer- been ssrvsd on the petitioner. H^ Law Officers' Office for three time^ thersfore, it was not his fault. The petiijonercan raise ail is not for this Court to go into d4l Enquiry Omeer shaii consider ths i; authority for fina! dscision. In cas| Officer to proceed with the enquiij its report as early as possibie, but i^ot iater than six months from today. With the obser/ations and ^irections aforesaid, the petition stonds disposed of. Consequentiy, M.(W-5P.N<j disposedof. ParSies are entitted for certifl Mr.Deepaii Pandey, Panei LjawyerfortheStatefrespondente. Heard both the counsei, 8y the instant writ petition ufider Articto 226/227 of the Constitutionof India, the petitioner has questioned tegsjiity and propriety ofthe order dated 1-4-2008 (Annexurs P-4) passed by respo|ident No.l.whereby the petitioner has been ground of misconduct for not filir,g repiy in W.P.No.4411/2004 (Prem Lai Y^Jay vs. State of Chhatiisgarh and others) in n-Charge offriecase. i-earned counsei for the psltitioner submits that charge sheet has airsady further submits that the petitioner came to fts , but repiy was not drafted by the Law Officer, hese pointe in hfs repi'y io the charge sheet. !t tails of the case. On ffli'ng ofsueh repty, th? bpiy and submit jts rsport befors the appropriate tha repiy is not foundsatisfactory, ttie.Enquiry expeditjously, compiete the same and submit -1511/2006 and i.A.No.3930/2006 aiso stand |ed copy of this wder. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [Tfra'?req'-