HTGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W. P. N0. 1681 OF 2003 Petitioner : Fakre Alam, S/o Sayyed Fakre Alam, agsd about 56 years, Occupation-Dressmy Animal Hospital Baikunthpur, R/o Q.No. 9, Dabba Quarter, Near High School, Baikunthpur, Distt. Kon'zi, CG. (CG) Versus State of Chhattisgarh through the Rsspondents Secretary, Department of Health, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Up Sanchalak, Pashu Chikitsa Sewayan, Baikunthpur, Distt. Koria (CG) 3. Pasha Chikkitsa Vistar Adhikari, Pashu Chikitsalaéya, Baikunthpur, Distt. Koria Shn' A.K. Prasad, counsel for the petitioner. Shn' Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for State/respondents. ORAL ORDER (3rd February, 2006) l ' In this petition, the petitioner who was working as a Dresser in Veterinary Hospital, Baikunthpur, District Koria? Chhattisgarh has been transferred to Office of Veterinary Hospital, Manendragarh, District Koria, Chhattisgarh vide order dated 28.4.2003 (Annexure P—l) 2. The petitioner has filed this petition impugning the transfer order dated 28.4.2003 (Annexure-l). This Court by order dated 12.6.2003 gamed stay of the impugred order. The said order dated 12.6.2003 was neither varied nor modified. Subsequently, the earlier impugred order was modified by the respondents and the petitioner was transferred to Veterinary Hospital, Gidam, District Dantewada by order dated 24.9.2003. Subsequent transfer order dated 24.9.2003 was also stayed by order dated 21.1.2004 of this Court. By virtue of orders dated 12.6.2003 and 21.1.2004, the petitioner continued at the old place of posting at veterinary Hospital, Baikunthpur. In View of the interim orders, final relief has already been gamed to the petitioner. At this stage, it is not necessary to go into the validity of the impugned orders dated 24.8.2003 and 24.920034 It is for the employer to post . an employee at a particular place in public interest aird in administrative exigency. The employer cannot be restrained from not exercising his power of posting of the employacs. infructuous. 3. Since the petitioner has get final relief; this petition has become It is expscted that the respondcnt auihorities will not insist upon compliance of the earlier transfer orders dated 28.4.2003 and 24.9.2003. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become inhuctuous No order as to costs. . Sd/— .. v Satish K. Agnihotri .’ Judge I r. W