IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.716 of 2010 1. MD. IZHAR S/o Md. Nisar 2. Md. Khairati @ Khattan S/o Abdul Mateen, Both the R/o Vill. Arha, P.S. Chandradeep, Dist. Jamui. 3. Md. Israil S/o Md. Nizamuddin 4. Md. Zahid S/o late Hamid Mian Both the R/o Vill. Kaitha P.S. Chandradeep, District Jamui. Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------- 2/ 17.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The revision application is filed against the Judgment and Order dated 04.03.2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Fast Track Court No. IV, Jamui in Cr. Appeal No. 243 of 2003 and the order dated 16.09.2003 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Second Class, Jamui in G.R Case No. 351 of 1992, Tr. No. 737 of 2003 arising out of Sikandra (Chandradeep) P.S. Case No. 67 of 1992. Sentence is pressed only referring the incident of the year 1992 and parties are at differences for the land dispute entitling petitioners of their release either on admonition or on furnishing of probation bond but now, they remained in custody since 06.03.2010 which can be observed sufficient towards sentence. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, the revision 2 application is partly allowed on the point of sentence which is modified and minimized to the period undergone and the above named petitioners are directed to be released forthwith, if not wanted in any other case. Rest of the Judgment and order dated 04.03.2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Fast Track Court No. IV, Jamui in Cr. Appeal No. 243 of 2003 and the order dated 16.09.2003 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Second Class, Jamui in G.R. Case No. 351 of 1992, Tr. No. 727 of 2003 arising out of Sikandra (Chandradeep) P.S. Case No. 67 of 1992 are hereby affirmed. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)