Crl. Misc. No. M – 36743 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- Crl. Misc. No. M – 36743 of 2009 Date of decision:- 10.2.2010 Tarsem Singh ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present:- Mr. Vishal Deep Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. A.S.Brar, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Advocate, for the complainant. Gurdev Singh, J (oral) Crl. Misc. No. 7153 and 7154 of 2010 Applications are allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl. Misc. No. M – 36743 of 2009 Heard. The petitioner- Tarsem Singh, has filed this petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the grant of regular bail in FIR No. 54 dated 13.10.2009, registered in Police Station Mantiana, District Hoshiarpur, under Sections 323, 324 and 307 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. The present FIR was registered on the basis of statement of Pritam Singh and according to him this occurrence took place on 12.10.2009 at about 8 PM in which Amrik Singh was caused injuries by the present petitioner and others. This petitioner is alleged to have caused injuries on his skull with the help of Datar. During the medical examination six injuries were found on the person of injured-Amrik Singh. A C.T scan was done and depressed Crl. Misc. No. M – 36743 of 2009 -2- fracture of frontal bone on the right side was seen and thereafter injury No.2, which has been attributed to the present petitioner, was declared dangerous to life. This petition has been pressed on the ground that petitioner had also received injuries in the same occurrence and that he has come out with a cross-version against the complainant-party. The copies of the statement of the petitioner recorded during the investigation and his MLR have been placed on record. It may be a case of version and cross-version but the fact remains that one of the injury so attributed to the present petitioner was found to be dangerous to life. If there is such a cross-version by the petitioner, it shall be seen at the time of trial as to which party was aggressor. Keeping in view the nature of the injury attributed to the petitioner and the circumstances in which the alleged offences were committed, I do not find any ground to release the petitioner on bail. Petition is dismissed accordingly. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he be permitted to withdraw this petition. After the detailed order in the petition, there is no question for allowing the petitioner to withdraw the same. February 10, 2010 (Gurdev Singh) tripti Judge