IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14672 of 2009 1. VIKASH RAI @ BIKASH KUMAR RAY SON OF CHANDRADEO RAI 2. ARUN RAI @ ARUN KUMAR RAI, SON OF BRIJ NARAYAN RAI BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – BAKHARPUR, P.S. PIRPAINTI, DISTRICT - BHAGALPUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.05.2009 Heard the parties. The offence alleged is under Sections 363. 366A, 34 of the Indian Penal code. It is submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case after giving second thought as would be evident on perusal of the petition filed by the victim herself in the court below as contained in Annexure- 3. It is further submitted that as per the medical report, the age of victim girl assessed is 17-19 years. It is further submitted that parents of the victim girl is married her and she is living in her matrimonial home Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, Let the petitioners named above released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Pirpainti P.S. Case No. 88 of 2008. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J) Jagdish/-