®¢v ChrQ/f $lngla agngh IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (s1 No.‘%%“">§ /201 1 / Smt. Neeta Shukla PETITIONER W/o Shri Sanjay Shukla \ Ibo H \ Aged about — 35 Years . ‘ , WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA /§ yRVw‘sy‘wgf‘ s6“ g‘VQ‘. \Q‘zb‘ ,1“ R/o Ramchandan Bada,Gond Para,Bilaspur(C.G.) I Vle .... $%‘eé ......... VERSUS Highcourt Of Chhattisgarh RESPONDENTS Through — Registrar General . Bilaspur,(C.G.) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HO§’QLE SHRI PRA$HANT KUMAR MISHRA, J. W.P. {S} No.3255 of 2011 PETITIONER Smt. Neeta Shukla. Versus RESPONDENT High Court of ChhattiSQarh. Shri Vivek Sharma. counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay K. AgrawaL counse! for the respondent. _ ORAL ORDER ( 241061201 1 ) x Heard. (2) Petitioner has applied for eppearing in the Civil Judge (Entry Levei) Preiiminary Examination. 2011 to be heid on 26/06l2011 by the respondent. The necessary qualification of a degree in Law was to be acquireci on the cut off date which was 08/04/201 1. Petitioner‘s application has been rejected on , the ground that she was not having qualification of graduation in Law on the cut off date. (3) Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on perusal of the mark-sheet (Annexure PM) of LLB. Part - lll Examination it would appear that petitioner hae passed the LLB. Examination on 10‘" June, 204.0, thus rejection of her candidature was not correct. (4) Shri Sanjay K, Agrawal. learned counsel appearing for the respondent has placed before the Court the original application form tilled in the handwriting of the petitioner. ln the said application, in Clause 10 thereof the petitioner has mentioned the date of passing the Law degree as 19/06/2011 i.e. after the cut off date. Thus. the decision taken by the respondent in declaring the petitioner in-eligibte is not faulty. The petitioner, who has not filled the form correctly, is to blame herself. (5) lt is settled law that the action of the respondent in declaring any i a candidate'in-eligiblehas to'be examined on the basis of information supplied 1 the candidates in the application form. No out. The writ petition is dismissed in Iimine. Sd/—’ Frashant kumar Mishra Judge v