IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9403 of 2010 JOGENDRA PRASAD @ CHHUTKA @ CHOTEY SARKAR @ CHHOTEY, SON OF PARMESHWAR MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.11341 of 2010 SUDHIR KUMAR @ SUDHIR PRASAD, SON OF KISHORI MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 15/04/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the Informant and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the First Information Report, the petitioner Sudhir Kumar @ Sudhir Prasad being the husband of the deceased, who had strained relationship with her, was suspected to have committed this crime. During investigation, the petitioner was nabbed who confessed before the police that he had contracted the murder of his wife through professional killers. The petitioner Jogendra Prasad was the companion of Bablu Paswan who was the professional killer engaged in this transaction. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)