-:1:- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION(LODG.) NO. 1307 OF 2007 PETITION(LODG.) NO. 1307 OF 2007 PETITION(LODG.) NO. 1307 OF 2007 ATV Projects India Ltd. ... Petitioners. V/s. Regional P.F. Commissioner & Anr. ... Respondents. Mr. Subhash Jha i/b. Law Global for the Petitioners. Mr. M.S. Karnik for Respondent 1. CORAM CORAM CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND : J.N. PATEL AND : J.N. PATEL AND K.U. K.U. K.U. CHANDIWAL,JJ. CHANDIWAL,JJ. CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 14TH JULY, 2008. : 14TH JULY, 2008. : 14TH JULY, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . Heard. 2. The Petitioner has approached this Court in its extra-ordinary jurisdiction impugning the notice dated 18.05.2007 which rather quantifies the amount of outstanding Provident Fund dues which is in the sum of Rs.49,91,757/- towards R.R.C. in respect of M/s. ATV Projects (I) Ltd. bearing Code No.MH/21570. This notice dated 18.5.2007 was served on the parties. It is thereafter, parties approached this Court. It is being contended before us that the dispute is in respect of statement of accounts in respect of outstanding P.F. dues. In so far as that aspect is concerned, the party has a remedy by challenging the decision of the Provident Fund Authority by preferring an appeal under Section 7-D of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. -:2:- 3. In respect of the amount which has been recovered in furtherance of the recovery proceedings, we find that there is no reason why the authority would not give appropriate set off for whatever has been recovered. We therefore do not find any merit in the petition. The same is dismissed. (J.N. (J.N. (J.N. PATEL,J.) PATEL,J.) PATEL,J.) (K.U. (K.U. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) CHANDIWAL,J.) CHANDIWAL,J.)