IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 5355 of 1996 Between: P. Yerran Naidu, S/o Rajappadu, Srikakulam District,R/o Arasavalli, Srikakulam (M) & Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND The District Co-operative Officer Srikakulam, Srikakulam District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order of the District Co-op. Officer in his Proc.Rc.No.2867/95C, dt: 9-2-1996 in appointing the C.S.R. (Credit) Srikakulam as enquiry officer, the conduct an enquiry on the same set of allegations on which the enquiry is already conducted is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and contrary to Section 51 of the A.P. Co-operative Societies Act. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.SIVA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: O R D E R: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequently another enquiry was conducted by the respondent after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the enquiry revealed that the allegations made against the petitioner are not true. Hence, no further orders need be passed in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _____________________ (B. PRAKASH RAO, J) Date: 24-11-2004 ghn To 1. The District Co-operative Officer Srikakulam, Srikakulam District. 2. Two CCS to Govt. Pleader for Co-Operation, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (OY+UT)1.2CCs to 3. Two CD copies