IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9294 of 2009 RANJEET SINGH, son of Late Shital Singh, resident of Village Lahladpur, P.O. Saidabad, P.S. Rani Talab Canpa, District Patna (Bihar). ---Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India through General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur. 2. The Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, East Central Railway, Hajipur. 3. The Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway, Danapur. 4. The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, East Central Railway, Danapur. 5. The Divisional Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, East Central Railway, Danapur. 6. The Senior Divisional Finance Manager, East Central Railway, Danapur. 7. The Officer-in-Charge, Railway Protection Force (Arrah), East Central Railway, Arrah. 8. Sri K.C.N.P.Sinha, Office Superintendent, Railway Protection Force, East Central Railway, Danapur. ----Respondents ----------- 2. 6.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-Union of India. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st of January, 2009, his retiral dues have not been paid as yet despite there is no dues of the Department nor there is any proceeding pending against him as would appear from Annexures 1 and 2. Mr Mahesh Prasad, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 submits that in case the petitioner files a fresh representation giving all the details of his claims, the same shall be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the 2 petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the claims of the petitioner, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, East Central Railway, Danapur (respondent no.4) stating the details of his claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of his claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks. In case such a representation is filed, the respondent no.4 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the admitted retiral dues of the petitioner could be paid without delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)