IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 4486 of 2010 Date of Decision: 15.3.2010. Deepti Sharma --Petitioner Versus Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Chander Shekhar, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) The petitioner applied for admission to M.B.A course in response to the prospectus/brochure issued by the Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra. The eligibility condition for admission to the course was graduation in any stream. It is admitted case of the petitioner that the petitioner had compartment at the time he applied for the admission. It seems that the petitioner applied under the management quota. Under the prospectus 75% seats were reserved on merit basis in AIEEE and 25% from management quota. It appears that respondent no.2-institute granted the admission to the petitioner to the course without the petitioner having graduation to his credit. The petitioner deposited the requisite fee and attended the classes of 1st semester. Not only this, the petitioner even appeared in the 1st semester examination. The result of the petitioner's examination has not been declared. Vide the impugned communication dated 17.1.2010 issued by the Kurukshetra University the admission of the petitioner to the course has been cancelled for the reasons that the petitioner had compartment and not eligible for admission to Post Graduation Course. It is this order which is under challenge in the present petition. CWP. No. 4486 of 2010 -2- The only ground urged is that the petitioner was admitted to the course under management quota and even directed to appear in the examination, hence, his admission cannot be cancelled at this belated stage. It is admitted position that the petitioner was ineligible at the time of grant of admission. Respondent college seems to have granted admission to the petitioner for the sake of fee. Such admission has been rightly cancelled by the university vide the impugned order. I do not find any infirmity in the impugned order. No merit, petition dismissed. It is, however, observed that respondent no.2-institution shall be liable to refund entire fee received from the petitioner. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 15.3.2010. lucky