IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43537 of 2010 JAGDISH PATEL SON OF LATE NARSINGH RAUT, R/O VILLAGE- TIN DOBIYA, P.S.- POKHARIA, DISTRICT- PARSA (NEPAL) Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 13/04/2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make the Union of India Opposite Party No. 2. Heard Mr. Brij Kishore Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Md. Abui Haidar, learned counsel representing the Union of India and learned APP for the State. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected considering the fact that co-accused Ramayan Patel has been refused bail by this Court. Submission is that now Ramayan Patel has been admitted to bail by this court vide Annexure-2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge/Bettiah in connection with Trial No. 24 of 2009 arising out of Sikta P.S. Case No. 20 of 2009 with condition that one of the bailors must be an employee of the State/Central Government or the Semi-Government concern. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on 2 each and every date during the course of trial and if the petitioner fails to appear on two consecutive dates without any reasonable cause shown by him, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) avin