IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 27664 of 2011 Date of decision:12.12.2011 Paramjit Kaur Petitioner vs. Sate of Punjab Respondent Present: Ms. GK Mann, Advocate Mr. Kirat Singh, DAG.,Pb M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioner is a female, who being owner of 22 kana 17 marlas of land, has allegedly entered into an agreement of sale with Vikas Goel and received a sum of Rs. 37 lacs. As per the agreement of sale dated 4.4.2011, the sale had to be executed by 25.11.2011. The FIR was registered on 14.7.2011. The petitioner had allegedly sold a part of some land in favour of Jaswant Kaur and Neelam Kaur against the agreement already entered into. The complainant Vikas Goel seems to have filed a suit for permanent Injunction restraining the plaintiff from selling the property. It appears that the complainant has not filed any suit for specific performance till date. I have seen the written statement filed by the petitioner in the suit for injunction, wherein she has denied to have entered into an agreement of sale with the complainant. It will be pre-mature at this stage to arrive at a conclusion that whether it is a case of sole civil liability or the petitioner, from the very beginning, had an intention to cheat the complainant. Since the petitioner has been in custody since 3.8.2011, she can be granted the concession of bail as the challan has already been presented. The petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond/ surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial court. December 12 ,2011 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE