IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.241 of 2010 AMAR SINHA S/O LATE KAMESHWAR PRASAD SINHA R/O MOH.- LAXMINAGAR, P.S.- GOGARI, DISTT.- KHAGARIA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE HOME SECRETARY BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER BHAGALPUR 5. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL BHAGALPUR RANGE, BHAGALPUR 6. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KHAGARIA 7. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KHAGARIA 8. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER GOGARI, KHAGARIA 9. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE GOGARI, KHAGARIA 10. THE CIRCLE OFFICER KHAGARIA 11. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER GOGARI, KHAGARIA 12. T.P.SINHA, EX-D.G.P. KHARKHAND S/O LATE NAGESHWAR PRASAD SINHA R/O MHOJUA, P.S.- GOGARI, DISTT.- KHAGARIA 13. UMESH SHARMA S/O KAMESHWARI SHARMA R/O MHOJUA, P.S.- GOGARI, DISTT.- KHAGARIA 14. MAHESHWAR SHARMA S/O KAMESHWARI SHARMA R/O MHOJUA, P.S.- GOGARI, DISTT.- KHAGARIA ----------- 3 06.01.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The prayer of the petitioner is that even though the property has been partitioned between the petitioner and the private respondents. However, still at the time of harvesting the men of the private respondents disturbed the harvesting. Petitioner apprehends that the same disturbance may also occur in the coming season as well. Learned counsel for the State submits that the apprehension of the petitioner as on today is unfounded. However, if petitioner has got any reasonable apprehension of any untoward action on the part of the respondents, it will be open for him to take appropriate steps as provided under the law. Considering the rival submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. However, it will be open for the petitioner to take appropriate steps as provided under different provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Amrendra (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)