IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26868 of 2009 1. SURENDRA NONIA 2. RAMENDRA NONIA 3. YOGENDRA NONIA ALL SONS OF LATE AKLU NONIA 4. RANJAY NONIA @ RANJAN NONIA 5. SANJAY NONIA BOTH SONS OF NAGINA NONIA 6. SHANKAR NONIA, SON OF YOGENDRA NONIA 7. CHINTAMANI DEVI @ CHINTA KUNWAR, WIFE OF LATE AKLU NONIA 8. TETRI DEVI, WIFE OF PYARE NONIA @ JAY RAJ NONIA 9. URMILA KUMARI, DAUGHTER OF NAGINA NONIA ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE PARAURA, P.S. SANDESH IN THE DISTRICT OF BHOJPUR. ----- PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----- OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2 16.10.2009 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to withdraw the anticipatory bail application of petitioner no. 1. Petitioner nos. 2 to 9 are apprehending their arrest in a case under Sections 341, 323, 325 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioners is that there was a quarrel between children of the family, which led to the assault of the informant and the wife of his younger brother by ‘Danda’, fists and slaps. Considering that the petitioner nos. 7, 8 and 9 are ladies, they namely, Chintamani Devi @ Chinta Kunwar, Tetri Devi and Urmila Kumari are directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks in connection with Sandesh P.S. Case No. 53 of 2009 on furnishing bail bonds of rupees ten thousand each with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. The prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner nos. 2 to 6 is rejected. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)