C J\BOI/ f , Singga Bgnsch ‘ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIsGARH A'r BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 366:) oF 2004 PETITIONER Annapurna Bahuddeshiya Sahakari Sama‘ti; Patthalgaon, District Ja’shpur,(c.G.). A Cooperative Society registered under Chhattisgarh Cooperative Society Act,1960, bearing Registrationi ' No.14' dated '23/7/04 having head office Patthalgaon, Post OfficeV Patthalgaon, District Jashpur, Through its Vice President Smt. Najma Begam, ‘ D/o. Date Mohd. Mohiddin, Aged ‘ about 24 years, Bilai Tangar, i PatthalgaOn, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. - VERSUS ‘State of iChhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Cooperatiive Department & Food \ REsPONDENTs “g, :,1. § I ' and Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection; Department, D."K‘,S. BhaWan REaipur (cs). he Cdllecjtor, T Jashpur, District Jashpur (C.G.). The Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue), Patthalgaon, District - Jashpur (CKGJ. ' ' @ , @, 4. The Food Officer, District Jashpur (C.G.). Nagar Panchayat Patthalgaon, Through: The Chief Municipal Officer, District Jashpur (C.G.). 9 5. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE. CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS l CERTIORARI ETC OR DIRECTION l ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC x mwgmbgé£6gé 200 ‘azrémaaa‘ (W) mmm ¥ v mmwwm %W\m $243605 Heard Shri Rajesh Pandey, counue§ fur *he netitioner Shn M K Agrawa Dy A C fort e Qiaielrespondews Return has aiready been Had 0n behalf of respondents; iherefure, as agreed to-by iearned counsel fer the pa 1ies, :he matter is being dispesed of at the admission stage itself. The petiiianer i$ a registered 5c iety and ailntment of fair'price shap was matie' in favaur of ih—e petitioner n 10-8-2604 Thereafier, the said ilotmént was canceileq vide arder dat d 21:9-2004 passed by respandem 03. The main grievance of the petimner is that the said aiiotmeni‘ was ‘ ariceiied by respondent N03 in an rbiirary manrer wsthoui amng any pnoriunny or hearing and snow cause o explain to the peimoner and m the eturn Ihis fact has nut been refuted b the Qiaie Theremre, he petmen eeervee m be a iewed on this écore om Hailing heard learned counsel for the pariiee and having regard to the ct that aiiatment inflair price shop, which was made in favaur gf the i efitiorier en 10-8-2D04, was ca‘nceiied b; respondent No.3 without giving any ppor‘tuniiy of hearing or show cau e tc ihe petitioner; therefore, this order buffers from the faoi that prmorpie or natural justice has been vieiaied in this maiter I m the reauii the writ petition rs airowed and the it pugned order re set asia’e‘ However‘ respondents wrii be at irberty to take action m aoeoroanoe with iaw. Parties are Entiiied for oenified co 3y of ihis 'orcier. Sdl- L.C.BHADOO Judge i ‘ . ‘ GL DRJJ——FS/3§O— 12/2000—e50‘,000r m a N s i a ”a b )