CWP No. 636 of 2005. 23.6.2008 Present: Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K.Verma, Dy. AG for respondents No.1,2,4 & 5. Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Mr. K.D.Sood, Advocate, for respondents No. 6 & 7. This is a public interest litigation filed way-back in 2005 when the Industry was under construction. The petitioner has come with the allegation that there is some noise-pollution. The Himachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board had examined the matter and has reported that noise-pollution is within its limits. The petitioner has not alleged anywhere the degree of noise-pollution, therefore, the allegation appears to be vague. The learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the noise-pollution be examined through some independent agency, however, he failed to indicate any such Agency in the matter. We are of the considered opinion that whenever a public interest litigation is filed, it is the duty of the petitioner and his learned counsel to ensure that specific averments are made and in this connection some homework is required to be done by the counsel for the petitioner which according to us has not been done in this Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. 23rd June, 2008. (Kuldip Singh), J. (ks)