IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 12TH AUGUST 2010 / 21ST SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 25376 of 2010(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- D.SAMUEL, GRADE A.S.I. (HCN 1206) TRAFFIC UNIT, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM RANGE, NANDAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, PATHANAMTHITTA. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 25376 OF 2010 (V) ===================== Dated this the 12th day of August, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner's grievance is about his non inclusion in Ext.P3 select list of Head Constables for promotion to the post of Assistant Sub Inspector of Police. According to the petitioner, going by the seniority and also on account of the fact that as per Ext.P2, his details have been furnished for inclusion in Ext.P3, the exclusion is illegal. It is stated that complaining of the above, he has filed Ext.P4 before the 1st respondent and even the representation has not been considered. 2. In my view, as at present, this is a matter for the 1st respondent to consider particularly since the issue involves assessment of the fitness of the petitioner for promotion to the post of ASI. Now that the grievance highlighted by Ext.P4 is pending before the 1st respondent, I dispose of this writ petition directing the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P4 and pass orders thereon. WPC No. 25376/10 :2 : This the 1st respondent shall do, at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp