IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2035 of 2005 MOHAN SINGH Versus THE REG.P.F.COMMISSIONER &ORS ----------- 05/ 11.01.2010 Heard Mr. Naresh Das for the petitioner and Mr. Rajiv Kumar Verma, learned senior counsel, representing the Employees Provident Fund Organization. The petitioner had filed the writ petition for re- fixation of his pension as per the provisions contained under the Employees Pension Scheme, 1995 and also for providing a calculation chart of the pension admissible to the petitioner. The petitioner had taken voluntary retirement with effect from 30.11.2000 from the service of Bharat Wagon Engineering Company Limited, Mokama while serving on the post of Head Security Inspector. A counter affidavit was filed on behalf of respondent no. 1 on 24.1.2006 and in paragraph- 4 thereof it is mentioned that on receipt of application of the petitioner the connected file was processed and the pension of the petitioner was revised and chart showing revision of pension was prepared on 10.3.2005 and the differential amount of arrears of pension of Rs. 12,521/- was also directed to be paid to the petitioner along with regular revised monthly pension fixed at Rs. 857/-. It was further stated that an office order was issued on 2 16.3.2005, whereby the differential amount of arrears of pension was communicated to the Punjab National Bank, Boring Road Branch, Patna for payment of the revised pension on regular monthly basis. It was thus submitted that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. In view of the submissions made in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no. 1, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, this writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)