IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.47707 of 2008 Bikram Poddar @ Doman Poddar son of Ramdev Poddar, Resident of village- Manopur, P.S.-Bhagwanpur, District- Begusarai. . . . Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR WITH Cr. Misc. No.3709 of 2009 Ramdeo Poddar, son of late Fekan Poddar, Resident of village Manopur, P.S.-Bhagwanpur, District- Begusarai. . . . . Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 08.04.2009 Since both the applications have arisen out of one and the same police case, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by the common order. The petitioners seek bail in a case which has been registered for the offences under Sections 364, 365, 386, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Informant’s son Lalan Poddar went with the petitioners for working in Delhi two years earlier but her son did not return. The informant suspected the hand of the petitioners in the occurrence. Submission is that the petitioners are not responsible for the career of the informant’s son. They are neighbours of the informant. One Complaint case no. 1025 C of 2008 was filed by Amarjit Poddar in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate against Satnam Poddar and Ghuran Poddar, son and husband of the Champa Devi, who is informant of the case and so in retaliation the present case has been lodged. The present case has been filed on 11.06.2008 whereas the complaint case has been filed on 26.05.2008. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, - 2 - petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand), each, with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case no. 106 of 2008. Uday/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)