Letters Patent Appeal No.949 OF 2000 ----- Against judgment and order dated 8.3.2000 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in C.W.J.C.No.884 of 1999. ----- THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS -------------Appellants Versus RAMDEO KUMAR ARYA -------------Respondent ----- For the Appellants : Mr.Anil Kumar, G.P.-XI For the Respondent : Mr.Tej Bahadur Singh,Sr.Adv. with Mr.Brajesh Kumar,Adv. ----- P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BARIN GHOSH THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANANDAN SINGH Barin Ghosh & Jayanandan Singh,JJ: During the pendency of the appeal, the order of the Court has been complied with without reservation. The appeal, therefore, has become infructuous. Furthermore, there was no just reason to prefer the present appeal inasmuch as by the order under appeal while the decision not to recognize the services of the writ petitioner – respondent was set aside, the matter was remitted back to the authority of the State for reconsideration of the case of the writ petitioner – respondent for recognition of his services and upon such reconsideration - 2 - during the pendency of the appeal the writ petitioner – respondent was appointed. 2. In the circumstances, the appeal is disposed of. (Barin Ghosh,J.) (Jayanandan Singh,J.) Patna High Court 26th June, 2008 N.A.F.R./Pradeep/