IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20028 of 2010 LALAN YADAV, SON OF LAL JEE YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 07.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that even though in the First Information Report the allegation is that the in-laws of the deceased had committed the murder for ends of dowry but during investigation, some witnesses stated that they had seen the deceased lying in injured condition and she was asking for water but she did not disclose as to how she had been injured. Subsequently, charge sheet has been submitted under Section 302 I.P.C. and, therefore, the submission is that it would not be a case of presumption against in-laws. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 13.12.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, in Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 133 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related 2 with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)