<cP IN THE HIGH COUHT QF ^tltKi ilSSAiK KI BILflSPUB (CG). Xrit Fetitionj!"! N©.—-U-2 Petitioner :t t9/s Asabika Traj Partne, ^SSESSSSS^S ^ ^y' '^ ^ Marg Aabikapur Versus ;; -I.» Regional Transpor-t Authority, ,f)OC Bilaspur (CGgi. /y' ^•' 2. Virandra Kuaar Pathak S/o, Shri Sadanand Pathak t^'o Opposite, Sovfc Hospi-fcal Ambikapur Sargujs .(03). 3. Bhuwan Bhaskar Pratap Singb S/o BaiBnath Pra-tap Singh, B/o Vil.lage-Udgi I'eh.Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (CG). B;;»rit Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India l^.^i^'^-;;*" f^sss'- ^•^•[-^.^•i^'^^ ^M C^^j^'^ •' •XI-HC-22 TSi' ^ (V^ \/'~+1-<'.+- i-^ .n/^...fi.n»,l?i".(<.»i..f.']»teu.i: ......f.^ .....&^.F..QA..A..(?.tt,AM^....... Si'^il^ T^ira'CTS'^ STqRi'3ti%"(T 03/04/2001 t^. SiW ssww" sn^r'FRnwa!%?r Shr-i B.K. Rawat. leafc-ned counsel £or the petitioner. Dr. N.K. Shukla, leai-ned Si Dy.A.G., for the respondentSj Heard. ^NWN llTtRif •?'fSTZt'TfsRZTi ^)3Tl^ttI31T j4— 'i-ffirfyj So £ar as the relief prayed under Sectlon 89(2) o the Motor vehicles Act is t concerned, learned coxusel fpr^ the petltioner does not pres| the said relief. He, howevej siibmits that tbe petitioner t>e granted some time to approacfi the S.T.A.T. in view of the earljier Judgments of this Court bolding that t|ie S.T.A.T. Gwalior would have the jurisdiction matters arising from Chhattl| Ths, ^TQW.^i^ Rsce^s:'^ twfav a 'I-W^A' "l^V !to hear an<3 decide the jsgarh region. I£ the petitlbner fi|les an appeal/revision before the S.T.A.Ta, Gwaliop days from today then the quejstioa o£ liiaitatlon shall not be permitted to be rais6p by ahybody and the S.T.A.T. shall be obliged tc^ within a perlod of 15 hear and decide the appeal/revlsion on the iBeritjs in accordance with law< s^—^^. J;c&a_afem. ;1( tf 3ni?i'^ ^••iNTSH^ •g^^-^f^T +i4!i?i41-<! tipRff 'EJ •ft^-ri^K ir srfSipr sn^sf With the liberty afc^resaid the petitlon isdisposed Gjf. Sd/- R.S. Garg Judge