IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3140 of 2011 BISHUNDEO YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.4461 of 2011 ROHIT KUMAR @ ANUJ MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 272 of the I.P.C. and Section 47(A) of the Excise Act. It is alleged that huge quantity of duplicate country made wine was recovered from the house of Bishundeo Yadav. Bishundeo Yadav has brought on record the agreement that the house was on rent to Rohit Kumar who is licensee. Rohit Kumar admits that he is licensee and seizure was made from his shop. In that view of the matter, let petitioner, Bishundeo Yadav of Cr. Misc. No. 3140 of 2011 be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection 2 with Dhamaul(Pakribarawan)P.S. Case No. 106 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M., Nawada, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. So far as Rohit Kumar @ Anuj Mahto of Cr. Misc. NO. 4461 of 2011 is concerned, it is submitted that he is the bonafide licensee and his license was valid till 31.03.2011 as contained in Annexure-3 and the bill invoice reflects that the liquors were purchased from the Bihar Beverage Corporation and the accusation is that the seized wine was spurious one is absolutely frivolous and still chemical report has not been received, let petitioner Rohit Kumar @ Anuj Mahto of Cr. Misc. No. 4461 of 2011 also be released on bail till receipt of chemical analysis report in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with 3 Dhamaul (Pakribarawan) P.S. Case No.106 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M.,Nawada, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)