IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA First Appeal No.77 of 1986 Ramji Pd. Versus Ram Krishna Pd. & Ors ---------------------------------- 58. 16.11.2011 The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to correct the provision of law in I.A. No.2411 of 2010. Permission is accorded. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent on the interlocutory application No.2411 of 2010. This is a compromise application filed by the sole respondent. It appears that earlier the suit for partition was filed by the appellant which was dismissed ex-parte. Against the ex-parte decree, the present appeal was filed by the plaintiff- appellant. The learned counsels for the parties submitted that during the pendency of the appeal because of intervention of the well-wishers, the parties have compromised and now they have partitioned the suit property according to the schedules mentioned in detail in the compromise application. According to the office note, there is no defect in the compromise application. I, therefore, find no impediment in the recording of the compromise between the parties. Accordingly, the compromise is recorded and it is directed that the First Appeal is decreed in terms of the compromise, i.e., I.A. No.2411 of 2010. Let a final decree be prepared and the compromise application shall form a part of the final decree. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)