IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2011 / 26TH PHALGUNA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 65 of 2011(S) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.24334/2010 Dated 09/09/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ------------------------- A.JOHN S/O.ANTONY, AGED 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT PULIMOOTTILPARAMBU, PALLURUTHY, KOCHI-6. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.PAVITHRAN SRI.M.VIVEK RESPONDENT(S): --------------- SRI.PATEL AJITH BHAGAVA RAO, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF KOHCI ERNAKULAM - 682011. ADV. SRI.RAJU SEBASTIAN VADAKKEKARA,SC. ADV. SRI. N. RAJAGOPALAM NAIR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Cont. Case (C) No. 65 of 2011 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 17th day of March, 2011. J U D G M E N T This contempt case is filed complaining that the direction in Annexure 1 judgment to the 1st respondent to disburse the terminal benefits of the petitioner's mother has not been complied with. Now, both parties agree that all amounts except provident fund amount has been paid. Learned counsel for the Corporation submits that provident fund amount would also be disbursed within one month. This is recorded and the contempt case is closed. If the same is not done within the said period, it would be open to the petitioner to file a petition to re-open the contempt case. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.