IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 02-07-2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.283 of 2007 (O.A.No.813 of 2001) D.Mohanrajan .. Petitioner. Versus 1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep. By the Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Transport Commissioner, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 3.Rajadurai 4.V.Manimegalai .. Respondents. Prayer: Original Application No.813 of 2001 filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, on abolition, transferred to the file of this Court and renumbered as Writ Petition No.283 of 2007, seeking for a writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the order passed by the second respondent in Proc.No.R1/41555/2000 (E.O.No.505/2000) dated 14.9.2000, and quash the same in so far as the third and fourth respondents are concerned and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to refix the seniority of the applicant and place him over and above his juniors and promote the applicant as Superintendent with effect from the date of promoting his immediate junior. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Singaravelan For Respondents : Ms.S.Anitha Government Advocate (R1 & R2) O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the first and second respondents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. At this stage of the hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the first respondent, with regard to the reliefs sought for in the present writ petition, and if the first respondent is directed to dispose of the same, on merits, within a specified time, as fixed by this Court. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection for this Court passing such an order. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the first respondent, as prayed for, within a period of two weeks from today, and on such representation being submitted, the first respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks thereafter. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 5. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. sd/ Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar csh To 1. The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Transport Commissioner, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. +1CC to Mr.R.Singaravelan, Advocate (SR.27796) Writ Petition No.283 of 2007 CO-KLT SRA-08/07/2009 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/