IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12340 of 2008 MAHMOOD MIAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 14.05.2010 Petitioner has challenged the order dated 20.01.2006 as well as the order dated 27.09.2006 passed in Sessions Trial No. 24 of 2005, whereby the learned Trial Court issued non bailable warrant and the process under Section 82 and 83 of the Cr.P.C. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that prior to the commitment of the case the petitioner was on bail but after commitment the petitioner has never received any summon to appear as a result of which he could not appear. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that still the case is going on for the appearance of the petitioner. Since the order is of 2006, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. However, learned Trial Court will consider this fact that summons were not served on the petitioner. If the petitioner appears within eight weeks, the learned Trial Court will consider the bail application of the petitioner in accordance with law and in view of the fact that he was on bail prior to the commitment, his contentions that he never received summons and thirdly on his undertaking that he will appear regularly during trial. 2 With the aforesaid observations, the application stands disposed of. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)