IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1230 of 2010 Date of decision:- 16.9.2010 Smt. Parvinder Kaur ......petitioner vs. Sh. Sukhwinder Singh and others ......respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. Kapil Kakar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S. S. Sahu, AAG, Punjab HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that except the benefit of leave encashment, the petitioner has been paid the entire benefits. Mr. Sahu, AAG, Punjab appearing for State-respondent states that the petitioner is in service and stands allocated to State of Haryana. Therefore, the question of payment of leave encashment, if any, would arise at the time of superannuation of the petitioner and that too by the State in which the petitioner is working. In view of the aforesaid fact, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to claim the benefit of leave encashment as and when the question of payment of leave encashment arises. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 16.9.2010 preeti