HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DEVISION BENCH CORAM: HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HON’BLE $HRE SUNEL KUMAR SENHA, J. MAJC) No. 672 of 2006 APPELLANT Kishore Kumar Mahawar, son of Shri Harish Mahawar, resident of Ward No.9, Old Bust Stand, Ratanpur, Police Station- Ratanpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1. Smt. Laxmin Bah wife of late Devi Prasae Sahu, aged about 25 years. 2. Km. Saroj daughter of late Devi Prasad Sahu, aged about 6 years (Minor) through her natural guardian, Mother Smt. Laxmin Bai. 3. Km. Preeti daughter of late Devi Prasad Sahu, aged about 5 years, (Minor) through her natural guardian Mother Smt. Laxmin Bai. 4. Km. Rinki daughter of late Devi Prasad Sahu, aged about 4 years (Minor) through her natural guardian Mother Laxmin Bai. 5. Durgesh Kumar, son of late Devi Prasad Sahu, aged about 2 V2 years (Minor) through his natural guardian (Mother) Smt. Laxmin Bai. All residents of Village Nawagaon, Police Station-Ratanpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 6. Dhan Kumar son of Babuji Yadav, aged about 33 years, resident of Sandhipara, Ratanpur, Police Station— Ratanpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ‘ \ \ @ + 7. Chandrika Prasad Sahu, son of Shri Ved Prasad Sahu, aged about 46 years, resident of Village- Nawagaon (Mohda) Police Station-Ratanpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 8. Smt. Dev Mati Sahu wife of Shri Chandrika Prasad Sahu, aged about 43 years, resident of Viiiage- Nawagaon, Police Station-Ratanpur, District Biiaspur (C.G.) Misc. Appeal Under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act Present: Shri Aman Kesharwani, learned counsel forthe appellant. None for the respondents. O R D E R (29th February, 2008) The following order of the ‘Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri Aman Keshwarwani, learned counsel for the appellant, in view of the out of Court settlement between the parties, seeks permission to withdraw the appeal filed by the appellant against the impugned award dated 06.11.2006, passed by the Ninth Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (FTC), Bilaspur, in Motor Accident Claim Case No.130/2005. 2. Permission granted. 3. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed as withdrawn. ' \l \n I .Sdl' . ‘ sunil Kumar S‘“h Judge Sd/- Chief Justice Subbu i