A IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.A. N0. APPELLANTS /CLAIMANTS ^ r'o /2006 RESPONDENTS ^NON-APPLICANTS 1. 2. /' Smt. Kanti Bai Yadu, Aged about 48 years, Wd/o. Dhanesh Kumar Yadu. Ku. Roma Yadu, Aged about 18 years, D/o. Late Dhanesh Kumar Yadu. Rajesh Yadu, Aged about 16 years, Minor, S/o.Late Dhanesh Kumar Yadu. Ku. Neha Yadu, Aged about 13 years, Minor, D/o.Late Dhanesh Kumar Yadu. Appellant No.38&4 are Minor through guardian mother Appellant No. 1. All are resident of MIG-36, Housing Board, Colony Kota, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Mustakim @ Munna, Aged about 24 years, S/o.Mohd. Rahmad, R/o.Village Silyari, P.S. Dharsiva, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Smt. Akhtari Bai, Wd/o. Mohd. Rahman, R/o. Village & Post Silyari, P.S. Dharsiwa, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 5. ^' The United India Insurance Company Limited, Branch Offlce Jagdalpur, Through Divisional Manager, Divisional Office- Kachahari Chowk, Jail Road, Raipur (C.G.) 4.^. Smt. Kamni Yadu, Aged about 70 years, W/o. Shyamlal Yadu, R/o. Betein-Q" Nutan School, Tikrapara, Raipur (C.G.) Shyamlal Yadu, Aged about 74 years, S/o. Itwari Yadu, R/o. Behind Nutan School, Tikrapara, Raipur (C.G.) 6. Gowardhan, S/o.Tirith Nimialkar Aged about 31 years, R/o. village Mandirhasaud, P.S. Mandir- hasaud, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 7. Chawla Road Carrier, Bilaspur Road, Fafadih, Raipur (C.G.) 8.^^ The National Insurance Company Limited, Through Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, Mobin Mahal, G.E. Road,Raipur (C.G) MISCELLENEOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT 1988. FOR ENHANCEMENT OFTHE COMPENSATION AMOUNT XI-HC-78 3TI^?TgiT f^TT^ cr^T3T^?T$h*4ic^ ^' 7S[ r^NMq, ^Tn<M<l<o, Rdl^y , MAPR. L(^o_^^^/ ^i^di sb<4icb ********:***i***^y* ^[ 3ii^i^si<n ^Rnw^cT^n^T Division Bench: Hon'ble Shri S.R. Nayak, CJ. ^se^Me^M^KSs^msMLj-l Shri KishoreBhaduri, learr) Two weeks' time is grante|d appeal shall stand dismissed for from the Court. Sd/- ChiefJustice cbi^I<rt<n»i*ii^<nT^te^<Rt«i< ^3Tf^T3:I1^T |ed counsel for the appellants. to remove the default, failing which the ^ion-prosecution without any further order Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Dcshmukh Judge ^' h XI-HC-78 ^3^• ^NIW, WTfiwKo, (q<nwy p~) jQ- ^ Q^)^~L iTm^rrgwN? **;>J'ft^***^*^/*<7<$* ^- 200 3ii^i ^isjcn (li?(^<s<<^) ^n^T^FT^rr^ cT8TT3TR?T9>HW ?^<fTW^1^f3TT^T ct)i^l<n<41-i Hi^^T^f^ft<f^i«i< ^3Tf^T3T1^FT 14-07-2006 -- ^. JVjlsceSlaneous Appeai (P.R.) No.420/2006 Is tres as for non- compliance of per-ernptory ord©r dated 21-06-2006 (for note-sheet part may kindEy be seen). Counsei be informed accordingjy. Sd/- A.R.(J)