IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14879 of 2011 Manoj Kumar @ Anil Kumar Versus Nathuni Prasad & Ors ---------------------------------- 02. 08.09.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application has been filed against the order dated 10.08.2011 passed by Sub Judge IV, Bettiah, West Champaran in title suit no.66 of 2009 whereby the learned Court below did not recast the issue suggested by the petitioner after amendment of the written statement. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Court below has stated that the parties are at liberty to suggest any issue till the argument of the case also and that may be considered by the Court. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, now it is admitted fact that both the parties are knowing the case of each other and the matter has been left open. At the time of hearing of the case, the parties are at liberty to raise these issues and if these issues are raised, the Court shall decide the same. With these observations, this writ application is disposed of. Saurabh (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)