H§$H COURT $$ $HHATTE$G£RH: $IL§$PUR yg ts o. 44% cf 2W8 git maaang; N Sahakari Vigariar‘: Sanstha Kawartiha, having Registration No, DRG/DRACI dated 19I3i‘} Q87. through its President ChhoteEai Chandravanshi, Sic. Gunagar Chandravanshi; aged 6? years, resident 0f Huh-.1 Vmayc I\UDGIHEHL&&, AA 1/...,....r4g.m (\am’dld Ed, But I§ Kabirdham (Chnat’tisgarh). Versus ‘L ate of Ch‘na‘étisaarh through i'qe Secretary, Departmerrt cf Fscd and Civii Suppiiéa Dau Kalyar‘. €5§rxgh Bhawani Raiur {Chhattisgarh}. 2. Chhattisgam State Civii Sunplées Cgrpararéon ihrough Managing D§recter, Ba§ Ashram Parisar, Kacheri Chas-wk, Raur {Chhartisgarh} District Manager, Chhatt‘rsgaz’h Stare Civii Suppiies Csrpcration Ltd) District Kabirdham {CG}. 4. Registrar, Co-opera‘iive Societies, C’nhattiegarin, Raipur (Chhattiegarh) 5. The Cciiec’ror, District Kabérd'riam (C‘rihattisgar‘n), 5? ( Jai Mae Vind‘nyevasirii Swa Sahayat Semec‘n; through ire President Smt, Nirmaia Yada‘vz Adarsb Nagar Kawerdha, Bistt. Kabrrdhar'n {Chhattisgamy Jai Maa Chandi Swa Sahayai Samcch, rhrough its President Smt. Kaiindri Bai, Devranganpara, Kawardha, Dietti Kebirdham Chhatiiegarh}. { 8 Hariom Swa Sahayat Samooh, through its President Smt, Sarojeni Bai, Rajma‘riai Chewk, Kawardha, Brett. Kabirdham {Chhat‘risgarh} (D Jai Ravidas Mahiia Swa Sahayat Samcah, rhmugh its President Smt Miinni Bai, Bocdha Mahadev Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (Chhatiisgarh) 10) Samudayik Vikas Samiti through irs President Smt indira Bait Kaiiaeh Nager, Kawardha, Kabirdhem Distt. (Chhattésgam). Petiiione: ‘t p Respondents ép $ (Writ Petttéon under Arkicke 226 0f the Cor:st§tution of Sham.) $B: Hon’bie Mr. Sa‘iish K. Agn‘moiri, J. D’resent: $hri Manindra Shrivwtava, Sr. Advocate with ShrE Rakesh Crubey, counsek far the patitmner‘ Shn Shashank Thakur, Govt. Admcaie fsr the Sia‘te. SEAL ORDER {Pasggd 9n 13‘“ day 9f Auggstg 2mm CEause 18 of the Chhattisgar'h Public Distribution Svs€em (Comm!) Order, 2904 prsvides for an appeai m respeci of the cro‘e: passed by the authority. 2} Learned counsel appearing for {he petitioner submits that emce the £mpugned arder is appmved by the Coilecter‘ the crder passed by the Feed Offtcer may not be apeeuabm ta the Canector. 3) The order is passer; by the Food Officer, not by the Cotieotor. Thus! it is ctariheo’ that the appeai may be preferred to the Colteotor, tmpogning the order dated 25—5-2008, if so advtsed. 4} tn 'iew of foregoing, this petition is o‘ieposed of. i\~ I‘ 7 K.Agnih9“"a Sdl- Judge L Satish