.aaasRS F SS.^-- ^- ^.- <»^-^- ^a:Z> 7-—- IN TH&HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR W.P.(S1 No s^o / 2007 PETITIONERS / /•6^ ^y> \^%of" ..'?'^-^\>t'"' .•/^<0^'' <y'"s:.1 ^-" / fS' RESPONBENT'S 1. Kashi Ram Patel, S/o. Shri Lala Ram Patel, aged about 39 years, Assistant Teacher (Science), Govt. Hr. Sec. School - Chaitma, Block - Pali, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) 2. Keshav Prasad Patel, S/o. Shri Bhaskar Prasad Patel, aged about 39 years, Assistant Teacher (Science), Govt. Hr. Sec. School - Tiwarta, Block - Pali, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary Department of Education D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^2. District Education Officer, Distt. - Mahasamund (C.G.) ^3. Assisfant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Distt.- Mahasamund (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PET1TION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WI^IT, WRITS, DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. \T" HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINQLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AONIHOTRI. J. WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.559 OF 2007 Petitioners : Smt. Dropati Thakur and another versus Respondents State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.560 OF 2007 PeUtioners : Dileep Kumar Verma and anottier versus Respondents State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and othere Petitioners WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.570 OF 2007 Kashi Ram Patel and another versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarhandothers WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.872 OF 2007 Petitioner : Sanjay Kumar Upadhyay versus Respondents Sterte Govemment of Chhattisgarh and another Present : Mr. f^sf Shrivastava and Mr. Anil Singh Rajput, pounsel forthepetitioners. Mre. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govemment Advocate and Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel La\vyerforthe State/respondents. ^o) ORDER (Passed on 2^ Day of January, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the parties joirrtty submit that the facls and question of taw involved in Ifte present wr'rt petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Sushll Tlwari and others vs. Stote Govemment of Chhatttsgarh and othera (Writ Petition (S.) No.5976 of 2006). dated 7-11-2006. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions are allowed in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Sushll Tiwari and others vs. State Govemment of ChhaMsgarh and others (Supra). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on the record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- iatish K. Agnihotri Judge