IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARILAL TUESDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2011 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 30521 of 2011(M) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- RAVEENDRAN.T.K, AGED 52 YEARS, THUNDIYIL HOUSE, NARANGANAM.P.O., KOZHENCHERRY, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADVS. SRI.SABU S.KALLARAMOOLA, SRI.S.NIDHEESH. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689 645. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARANMULA POLICE STATION, ARANMULA, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689 533. 3. T.S. PRASANNAKUMAR, THUNDIYIL AKKARA, NARANGANAM.P.O., KOZHENCHERRY, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689 642. 4. NAKULAN, CIVIL POLICE OFFICER, COP 1534, ARANMULA POLICE STATION, ARANMULA, PATHANAMTHITA, PIN - 689 533. 5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 691 522. R1, R2 & R5 BY SRI. P. VIJAYA RAGHAVAN (STATE ATTORNEY), SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. SHYSON.P.MANGUZHA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/11/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).NO.30521/2011-M: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DTD. 14/07/2011. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE WRITTEN OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.D.O. ADOOR IN B2-2127/06. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE PLAN. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE NOTICE DTD. 10/11/11 ISSUED BY R.2. TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD. 12/11/2011 BEFORE THE R.1. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE ENDORSEMENT FORWARDING COMPLAINT TO THE C.I. OF POLICE FOR TAKING ACTION. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Prv. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & K. HARILAL,JJ. .................................................................... W.P.(C).NO. 30521 OF 2011 ................................................................... Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2011. JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J. It is submitted by the Government Pleader on behalf of the State Attorney that accusations of harassment levelled by the petitioner against the police officers are absolutely unfounded. The third respondent - Prasanna Kumar filed a complaint against the petitioner. The above complaint was enquired into and the enquiry revealed that the dispute between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent is a civil dispute. Parties were advised to have a recourse to the civil proceedings for redressal. The attendance of the petitioner is no longer required by the police in connection with any enquiry or investigation. We record all the submissions of the learned Government Pleader and dispose of the writ petition accordingly. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. K.HARILAL,JUDGE. cl