IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2010 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1932 WP(C).No. 16031 of 2010(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. K.K.VINOD KUMAR,S/O.V.SANKARANKUTTY NAIR PHARMACIST GRADE-I,DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS HOSPITAL, KANNUR. 2. K.ASHOKAN,PHARMACIST GRADE-I,PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE,MUZHAPPILANGAD,KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR SRI.K.JAGADEESH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,HEALTH DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICE, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GP SRI.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C).16031/2010 -------------------- Dated this the 26th day of May, 2010 JUDGMENT Petitioners are Pharmacists Grade-I aspiring for promotion as Pharmacist Store Keeper. It is stated that by Ext.P1 order, about 500 promotions were effected and pointing out the defects in Ext.P1, they have submitted Exts.P2 and P3 to the 2nd respondent. According to the petitioners, these representations are still not considered. Therefore the writ petition is filed. 2. If as stated by the petitioners they have submitted Exts.P2 and P3 pointing out the irregularities in Ext.P1 order, there is no reason that the same shall not be considered. 3. Therefore I dispose of this writ petition directing the 2nd respondent to consider Exts.P2 and P3. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible at any rate within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs