IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 6922 of 2011 Date of Decision : 30.08.2011 Gagan Singh Versus State of H.P.& ors. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Raju Ram Rahi, Advocate For the respondents : Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G & Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy. A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner claims work charge status/ regularisation with all consequential benefits from the date he completed 10 years of continued service. Reliance is placed on the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P. and others, 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316. 2. The learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioner submits that he would file appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for him to do so. The second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in light also of the decision referred to above within a period of another four months. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment, referred to above, while submitting the representation. 2 3. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of , so also the pending application(s) if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. August 30, 2011 (rana/c)