APPLICANT /RESPONDENTS NO 3 RESPONDENTS r.__ or? \W Y/l (y $ingie 3mm Review Petition No. 65 [2009 Bacheli Forest Division Dantewada, District— Dantewada (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through—Secretary D.K.Sr Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Divisional /AD Shukia, S/o G.D. Shuklar aged about 58 years, working in the post of Forest Range Officer Forest Department, Forest District Dantewada (C.G.) Prahlad Das, S/o Late Shri Bhojwas Das, Range Officer Dantewada (C.G.) Officer. Dantewada, EE'st’ONDENT Per TIONER No. 3 ( CHHATTISGARH ) aged about 57 years. Bacheli. District — BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPLICATION FOR REIEWlMODIFICATION OF THE ORDER DATED \MM 15.07.2009 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE COURT OF JUSTICE SHRI 'gRiTINKAR DIWAKAR J. iN wmsi No. 3437/2009 ' <i w HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT WLA3PUR (Hum. Mr. Jumice Pminkar mwaker) Review Petition N3. 68 of 2&09 APQUCIXNY AD. Shukia VERSUS RESvPONEENTE; State of Chhattisgarh and others. 0 R D E R (in Chamber} (09.10.2009) The appticant has filed this appiication and prayed far review of fhe Order dated 1512009 passed by this Court in W.P. (S) No. 3437/2009. 2. it is settled iaw that the High Court exercises power of review as a Cour’t of plenary jurisdiction to prevent miscarriage of justice or to correct grave and paipabie error committed by it. There is no definitive iimit to the exercise of the powers of review. The power oi review may be exercised on the discovery oi new and important matter or evidence which, after the exercise oi due diiigenoe, was not within the knowledge of the person seeking the review or couid not be produced by him at the time when the order was made. it may be exercised where some mistake or error apparent on the face of the record is found. However, the power is to he exercised with the limitations as provided under 8ection 114 read with Order 47 of the Code of Civii Procedure, 1908. 3. in the present case no such illegality or paipabie error hae been pointed out in the review petition. Accordingly, it is being without substance, dismissed. The appiicant is however at liberty to . avail the remedy avaiiable to him under law. Sdl— Prit'mker Diwaker Judge