PETITIONER : Yadram W HIGH COURT OF CHI-IA'I‘TISGARH AT BILASP Writ Petition No. 1678 of2002 Sahu, S/o Shri Deharuram Sahu, R/o La&1khurd, Post Bamhani, District Mahasamund (CG). RESPONDENTS : 1, Deputy Director (Hotricaltute), Raipur Division, Civil Offiecr, Labour Court, Raipur (CG); ’ (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) \ Present : Shri Pradeep Saxena, Advocate for the petitioner. VERSUS Lines, Raipur (CG). 2. Presiding gSB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish‘ K. Am0g; J.) a 06,1101 (Annexure P/l ), None forrthe respondents. y ORAL ORDER f“ (Passed, on 3” nay of July, 2008) The petitioner, by this petition, challenges the validity of‘the order dated passed by the Presiding Qfmer, Labour Court, Raipur, to the extent of grant of 25 percent back-wages. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner Submits that the petitioner is entitled to 100 percent back-wages as the peti ‘oner was restrained from working. consideration of the facts of the case, in regard to Court. Thus, at this stage, with re—instatement is just and proper and no 25 percent back-wages interference with impugned order is warranted. 4. Thus, petition is accordingly dismissed. No order asto costs. ///s’df’/\ l grant of back-wages, when there is no foundation laid down by the Satish K. Agnihotri /3gc‘ge// r r s i ‘l I In 0n perusal of the pleadings and documents appended thereto, it appears that the petitioner was reinstated on the findings that the retrenchment was not legal. Grant of‘fuil back-wages was not pleaded before the Labour petitionerbefore the Tribunal below, is not proper and justified. Grant of ‘