IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2107 of 2006 1. SURENDRA KAPRI son of late Kishun Kapri, resident of village Aunta, P.O. Aunta, P.S. Hathidah, Dist. Patna. ….Petitioner Versus 1.THE REG.P.F.COMMISSIONER, R. Block Road No. 6, Patna. 2.The Assistant Proviident Fund Commissioner, Sub Regional Office, Employees Provident Fund Organisation Balai Commercial Complex Benachity, Durgapur, West Bengal 3.The General Manager Bharat Ophthalmic Glass Limited Lenin Sarani Durgapur ….Respondents. ----------- 2 15.2.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner has prayed for re-fixation of his pension under the Employees Pension Scheme 1995 framed under the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is entitled to a pension of Rs. 1097/- per month under the provision of the Scheme and as against that the respondents have sanctioned only Rs. 644/- per month vide Annexure-2.It is thus contended that the petitioner deserves a higher pension. No counter affidavit has been filed in the case. Mr. R.S Pradhan learned senior counsel representing the Provident Fund department submits that if the petitioner files a representation with supportive details, the same would be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. Taking into consideration that the matter has been pending since 2006, this writ petition is disposed of with enabling the petitioner to raise his grievance before the Regional provident Fund Commissioner with supportive details and who shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of 3 months from the date of filing of such representation by the petitioner. - 2 - The writ petition stands disposed of with direction aforesaid. (Jyoti Saran, J) M.Rahman