IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 60 OF 2006. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 60 OF 2006. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 60 OF 2006. Shripati Apparao Rakade .. Petitioner. versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondent ... ... ... Mr.Sanjay Prabhu for the petitioner Mr.V.Mhaispurkar, AGP for the state. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 29th August 2006. DATED : 29th August 2006. DATED : 29th August 2006. P.C:- P.C:- P.C:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner states that the impugned order has been complied with. In paragraph no.6 of the affidavit in reply filed by Shri B.D. Sanap, Commissioner of Labour, he has also stated that the impugned order dated 19th February, 2005 passed by this court in the writ petition of the breach has already been complied with. ...2... 2. In view of this, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the contempt petition. Leave granted. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. ( D.G. KARNIK, J ( D.G. KARNIK, J ( D.G. KARNIK, J.)