:1: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE DISTRICT : CONTEMPT PETITION NO.362 OF 2008 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders --------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri N.V. Bandiwadekar for the Petitioner. Mr.S.R.Nargolkar for Respondent nos.1 and 3. CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008 P.C : P.C : P.C : The orders of which contempt has been alleged, is on the basis that Respondent no.4, Additional Director General of Police has passed the order of suspension in respect of the Petitioner despite the fact that the order of the Division Bench dated 15.9.2008, as clarified by the order dated 26.9.2008, granted the State Government liberty to consider the question whether it wants to place the Petitioner under suspension. :2: 2. The order does not prohibit any party other than the State Government from suspending the Petitioner. It merely grants the State Government liberty to do so. In that event, no case for contempt is made out. 3. It is however clarified that the contentions of the Petitioner regarding the exercise of power by Respondent no.4 being illegal and contrary to law, are kept open. 4. If indeed power has been exercised illegally, the Petitioner is always at liberty to adopt proceedings in accordance with law for challenging the same and enforcing his rights. 5. With the above clarification, the Contempt Petition is disposed of. ***