IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9761 of 2008 SHAILESH KUMAR & ANR Versus BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS ----------- For the Respondent : Mr. Chitranjan Sinha, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ratan Prasad Sinha, Adv. For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kr.Thakur, Adv. ----------- 4 30.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. After exchanging many affidavits between the parties, the issue has finally boiled down to this that after the final results are announced and uneligible candidates are eliminated in the process of selection after interview it goes without saying that if the petitioner comes within the zone of consideration in this recruitment, he shall be considered by the respondents. All the other allegations and averments initially made in the writ application now stands belied by the evidence which has been brought on record by the respondent’s Bihar State Electricity Board. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observation. Rajeev/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)