jpc appln902-11.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 902 OF 2011 Gurushant Satlingappa Chudoli @ Omguru ... Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. Nilesh Kulkarni i/by Mr. P. G. sarda, for the applicant Mr. J. P. Kharge, APP for the State Mr. Rishi Bhuta, for the intervenor- first informant. CORAM:- A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED :- 12th August, 2011. P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, it is not advisable to reduce the amount of bail. However, since the applicant has not been able to furnish a surety in the stipulated amount, I am inclined to give an option of furnishing four sureties to make up the bail amount. 3. The applicant is given an option of furnishing four sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- to make up the bail amount. 4. The application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (A.M. THIPSAY, J.)