IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 19TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 2329 of 2008(B) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ CHERUVATTEDATH MOVAKKADATH BALAMANI AMMA DAUGHTER OF KUNHI AMMA, AGED 42 YEARS, PARAKKOTTIL HOUSE, PERUMANNA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.MOHAMMED ASLAM SRI.P.K.YUSUFF ISSUDDIN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, KOZHIKODE. 2. REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, KOZHIKODE. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. N.V. RAJESH, SON OF RAJAN, AMBALAPPADI, ERANJHIKKAL, KOZHIKODE. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. C.K. GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. W.P.(C)NO.2329 OF 2008. DATED THIS THE 8th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2008 JUDGMENT For realisation of the amount in default towards motor vehicle tax due from the petitioner's husband, revenue recovery proceedings have been initiated against her. When Ext.P3 revenue recovery notice was received, the petitioner filed Ext.P4 objection. It is submitted by the petitioner that without considering the objection raised in Ext.P4, revenue recovery action is being continued and it is in this background, this writ petition has been filed. 2. Having regard to the fact that the primary liability is of the husband and the petitioner's case is that the liability has accrued after the transfer of properties, her objection needs to be considered. Accordingly, I direct that the first respondent shall consider Ext.P4 objection filed by the petitioner, with notice to her and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within four weeks from the date of production of a W.P.C.NO. 2329/2008 -2- copy of this judgment. In the meantime, further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P3 notice issued under the Revenue Recovery Act will stand deferred for a period of six weeks. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the first respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ks. K.R.UDAYABHANU,J. =================== CRL.A.NO. OF 200 JUDGMENT DATE: ......2006 =====================