IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS MONDAY, THE 14TH JUNE 2010 / 24TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 14237 of 2010(D) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- MUHAMMED SALIM, S/O.LATE MUHAMMED, AGED 53, KOZHIPATTIL HOUSE, CHERAKKAPARAMB AMSOM, PUTHANANGADI DESOM, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. MUHAMMED HARIF, S/O. UMMER, ULLATTUPARA, PATTIKKAD P.O., PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM. 3. ETTUVEETTIL ABOOBACKER, PADAPPARAMB VIA, THEENDEKKAD, VENGARA, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS. R2 BY ADV. SRI.SAJU.S.A R3 BY ADV. SRI.AJAYA KUMAR. G THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC 14237/2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1.PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 29.4.2010. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS EXT.R2A.TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 3.2.2009 WRITTEN BY THE PETITIONER TO THE WIFE OF THE RESPONDENT. EXT.R2B. TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 8.5.2010 FILED BY THE DAUGHTERS OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERINTHALMANNA. K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.14237 of 2010-D ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 14th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. This writ petition is filed seeking police protection. We heard the learned counsel for the parties. We take note of the order dated 26.5.2010 and we dispose of the writ petition by making the interim order absolute subject to the following modification. The direction that the Ist respondent shall visit the house of the petitioner daily is vacated and instead we direct that in case the wife and daughter of the petitioner have any complaint in the working of the interim order that it is being misused by the petitioner it shall be open to them to approach the Ist respondent seeking appropriate orders. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS