CR No. 6372 of 2010 -1- **** IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 6372 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 30.09.2010 Hem Raj .......... Petitioner Versus Vikramjit ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present : Mr. S.S. Virk, Advocate for Mr. Shivraj Angi, Advocate for the petitioner. **** VINOD K. SHARMA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has invoked the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to challenge the order dated 15.9.2010, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Talwandi Sabo, vide which application moved by the petitioners for leading additional evidence was ordered to be dismissed. The petitioner moved an application for producing additional evidence in support of his application for setting aside an ex parte judgment and decree, which was opposed by the respondent. In view of the pleadings of the parties, issues were framed. In the application in spite of availing number of opportunities the petitioner failed to conclude his evidence, therefore, the learned trial Court was pleased to close the evidence of the petitioner by CR No. 6372 of 2010 -2- **** order. The petitioner did not chose to challenge the order and allowed it to attain finality, and moved an application for leading additional evidence. In view of the fact, that earlier order has attained finality, vide which evidence of the petitioner was ordered to be closed, therefore, no ground for additional evidence was made out, as in the garb of additional evidence, the petitioner can not seek the setting aside of order of closure. The learned trial Court, therefore, rightly dismissed the application for leading additional evidence, which do not call for any interference by this Court in exercise of revisional jurisdiction. No merit. Dismissed. 30.09.2010 (VINOD K. SHARMA) 'sp' JUDGE