THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No :23010 of 2007 DATED:17-01-2008 BETWEEN: Pasula Kistaiah. ..... PETITIONER AND The District Collector, Sangareddy, Medak District & another. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in asking the petitioner orally to vacate from the possession of land bearing Sy.No.476 to an extent of Ac.1.00 situated at Toopran village and mandal, Medak District pending consideration of the representations of the petitioner, dated 15-01- 1982, and reminders, dated 12-09-1997 and 05-01-2007, as illegal, and arbitrary. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that he was in possession of an extent of Ac.3.20 guntas out of which an extent of Ac.2.20 guntas was assigned in his favour but Ac.1.00 in Sy.No.476/1 was not assigned to him. Therefore, he made a representation, dated 15-01-1982, and thereafter reminders. It is the case of the petitioner that he is also entitled for assignment or alienation of the said Ac.1.00 of land. 4. Learned Government Pleader on obtaining written instructions submits that the land bearing Sy.No.476 is a Gairan land admeasuring Ac.25.38 situated at Toopran village and mandal, out of which an extent of Ac.8.02 has been assigned in favour of various persons and an extent of Ac.17.36 has been alienated for construction of Mandal Complex buildings and out of the said assigned land of Ac.8.02, petitioner was assigned an extent of Ac.2.20 in Sy.No.476/2/1, and his wife, namely Pasula Narsamma, was assigned an extent of Ac.2.20 in Sy.No.476/2/2 and there is no balance area available in Sy.No.476 situated at Toopran village and mandal. 5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am of the opinion that the petitioner is not entitled for consideration of his representation as he and his wife are beneficiaries having got an assignment of Ac.5.00 and therefore, petitioner is not entitled for any relief in this Writ Petition. 6. Accordingly, Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J 17th January, 2008. Tsy