THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA WRIT PETITION No.4016 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner averred that he purchased the land admeasuring Ac.1.00 in Sy.Nos.500 and 501 situated at Kodad Town and Mandal, Nalgonda District, from one V.Mounika, the daughter of the 4th respondent. However, subsequent to the death of the said Mounika, the 4th respondent is alleged to have made a representation dated 21.09.2010 to the 3rd respondent, requesting to mutate his name in the revenue records, and basing on that representation, he filed W.P.No.477 and 2011, seeking a direction to consider his representation dated 21.09.2010, and the said writ petition was decided vide order dated 24.01.2011 with a direction to the 1st respondent therein to consider the representation dated 21.09.2010 purported to have been filed by the 4th respondent and decide the same in accordance with law. The grievance of the petitioner is that he filed his objections before the 3rd respondent not to mutate the name of the 4th respondent in the revenue records in respect of the land purchased by him, but without considering his objections and under the guise of the orders dated 24.01.2011 passed by this Court in W.P.No.477 of 2011, the 2nd and 3rd respondents are making attempts to mutate the name of the 4th respondent in the revenue records. Hence, this writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if the name of the 4th respondent is mutated in the revenue records in respect of the lands purchased by the petitioner, irreparable loss would be caused to the petitioner. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider the objections filed by the petitioner while considering the application of the 4th respondent and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. No order as to costs. _____________________ ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA,J 21.02.2011 v v