IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9788 of 2010 GUDDU KUMAR PANDEY, SON OF LATE RAM BALAK PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18/03/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that petitioner being the driver of the vehicle from where money was stolen, has been suspected to have done so, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 23.12.2009 and has no criminal antecedents, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Satish Kumar Jha, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Samastipur, in connection with Samastipur (Town) P.S. Case No. 772 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)