IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15027 of 2010 RAM SWAROOP SINHA, son of Late Govind Singh, resident of Village-Kako, P.S. Kako, in the district of Jehanabad. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through the Secretary Cum Commissioner, Road Constriction Department, Bisheshwariya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2. The Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department, Bisheshwariya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 3. The Chief Engineer, Road Construction Department, Bisheshwariya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 4. The Superintending Engineer, Magadh Circle, Road Construction Department, Gaya. 5. The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Division No.I, Jehanabad. 6. The Director, General Provident Fund (GPF), Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 7. The District Provident Fund Office, Jehanabad. 8. The Treasury Officer, Jehanabad. 9. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 9.9.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that although he has received his pensionary benefits, but the same needs to be revised in view of the grant of first and second A.C.P. as per the order dated 5.6.2008, as contained in Annexure 2. It is submitted that the pensionary benefits have not been revised despite representation. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the grievances of the petitioner would be considered at the earliest. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for - 2 - the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Executive Engineer, Road Construction Division No.I, Jehanabad (respondent no.5), with a copy each to respondents no.3, 4 and 9. In case such a representation is filed stating the details of his unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the petitioner may get the revised pensionary benefits with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)