IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4522 of 2003. Niranjan Lal Joshi son of Shri Babu Ram Joshi VERSUS Additional District Judge No.3, Jaipur City, & Others Date Of Order ::: 24/03/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain J. Mr. Anoop Dhand, Counsel for the Petitioner Mr. M.M. Ranjan, Counsel for the respondents BY THE COURT : Heard learned counsel for the parties. The applicant/respondent no.3 Pushkar Dutt Joshi, filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10, C.P.C. in the trial Court in a suit for specific performance of the disputed property, filed by the petitioner Niranjan Lal Joshi against the defendant/respondent no.2 Prakash Chand Goyal. The detailed facts and reasons have been mentioned in the impugned order by the trial Court while allowing the application filed by Pushkar Dutt Joshi (respondent no.3) under Order 1 rule 10, C.P.C. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties in the light of reasons assigned by the trial Court in the impugned order. I do not find any illegality in the order passed by the trial Court warranting any interference by this Court under its extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. ashok/