^ . ^I^CTG 2—. In the Hon'ble Hieh Court of Judicature of r'hhatrissarh at Bilaspur (C.G.) W.P.NO. S~& T^ 2006 &^ Petitioner fan Chandrakar, aged 50 years, Son ofShri Vishnu Prasad Chandrakar, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Aachhoti, R/o Village Aanda, Tahsil & District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS ^-1. / The State Govemment of Chhattisgarh, Respondents ^fi{Sfr Through - The Secretary, ..••'\^-' „ Tribal Welfare Department Ministry, ,6^'.--^.--y,.-•'''' DK-S- Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) o r..-/,"^etti,,..-''' \.--": S^."'" Y 2. District Education Officer, Durg. Block Education Officer, DU^, DistrictDurg (C.G.) ,..-•..^" ^r -3' 'o-'" ^y WritPetition Under Articles 2^6/227 of The Constitittion Oflndia for the issuance of WRIT in the nature ofMANDAMUS certiorari, Prohibition and for other suitable writ w writs, order or orders, direction or directions. f HI6H COURT OF WHATTS.SGAKH AJ BZL4SPUR W. P.fs)No. 5057 of 2006 setitioner ^arayar! Chandr c.. Respondents Versus Trie State Governmen* of Chhattisi &others h'on'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Aanihotri. Shrj .4 iay Shrivastava, Advocate for the Petitioner. 5mt. ,4nju Ahuja, Dy. Qov*. ,4dvocate for the respondents/State. (18 Septeml !. Learned counse! appearing for -rfie petitloner submits that while working as Assistant Teacher, the petitioner has gone on tr'aining to improve his qua'ificatEons on his own expenses and icquired B.T.I. Exsmination Certificate in the year 1992 from the Board of Higher Secondary Education, Atadhya Pradesh, ;i1 At°l/' Ot.UpUI. ,4ccording to iearned counse! for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitSed to two udvance increments in view of the decision of tiiis Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadv»aj Vs. ,'Aunicipal Corporation, Durg aid wio-rtier {2006 (II) .WJR-C6 96). This Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. iViuniclpal Corporation, Durg aid another (Supra), came to the :onclusion 'that the teachers, who had, obtained B.T.I. Examination Certificate on his own expenses, are covered by the circulsr dated 24.12.98 (Annexure P/2) issued by the State Sovernment of Madhya Pradesh 3. Leamed counsel for the petitioner further submits 1+iat the facts and question of law involved in the present case are squarely covered by decision of this Court in the case o-f< 'ashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. A^unicipa! Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents fairly concedes and agrees n'ith the averrnent made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 4. According!y, the writ petition is a'lowed in terms of the order passed in ths case of Ycshwait Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification ^T TH& TSXGT as to whether the petitioner has acquired B.T.I. :xamination Certificate on his own exsenses or not. No order as to costs. Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^^•^^