? Cft t^ IN_^;-iE_HIGH_C:OU8T_OF,JUDieATUKE AT_BILa>S.PUR „ (C.S.) •<rit Pebi •2J3^C FETIIIOKER SareaAra Kumar Garg S/®Srl. Om. Prakash Garg» Age< absaut- 40yrs R/». Village- Kerju, Xi'kashKhane Sitapur. Tahsil-Sitagur, Distt - sarguja (C.3.) ffS'S^'s^^.S!^SsS^ RESFOKD^NTS A^y ^^' . /%^^ ^yS^' ^'I^y'.--'w r^/' ^•' / 1 \ Q 1) Stat< Secretsry, Begartmeat sf Pesd 6. Civil Suyyly & ±»a Deytt. D»X.S. Bhaw.an, J.S S^S.JL^ (2) SQO. Sita] Distt- Sarg «^.re (3) Asstt. F©s® Officer Sltapar, Distt- (45 Deputy Cellect©r, Sarguja, Ambikapur, Distt- Sarguja (C.G fs^ <_~! _^2__ ,-y *^RITjPE;£IT^^-ImD£s.-MIS£s^l6^222-££..^NsSl:E^TAlji«2F--Bi2I.S, n I^I^N ^^^;^.:?!B^3^ l:"!tC''%II% ::'%i :i, S ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATfISGARH AT BILA8PUR WUT PETITIQN No. 2370 of2003 PETITIONER : SurendraKumarGarg. VERSUS RESPONT)ENTS : State ofC.G. & Others. WRIT PETITION LJNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTfTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Ue Shri Satteh K. Aenihotri. J. Present: Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, Advocate for the petitioner. A.V. Sfaridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ihri A.V. (Passed oa 30EB day of June, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for tiie petitioner, on instructions, submits that with the passage of time, this petition has become mtmctuous. Leamed counsel appearing for the other does not controvertthe above submission. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as havuii become inJTuetuous. Interim reliefgranted earlier is vacated. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge