IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Crl. Misc. No. M-21310 of 2009 Date of Decision:14.01.2011 Pawan Kumar .....Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- None for the petitioner. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. AG, Punjab. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed on behalf of petitioner Pawan Kumar for issuance of direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to safeguard the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members at the hands of respondents No.4 to 8 and for further direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to take action on the representation made by the petitioner. Notice of motion was issued on 5.8.2009. Reply has been filed in the Court and the same is taken on record. It has been found in the inquiry that in fact a cross case was filed against each other and subsequently, after conducting detailed inquiry, the cancellation report has been prepared. Ms. Rajni Gupta, learned counsel for the State submits that a detailed investigation was conducted and it was found that there was a dispute between the parties regarding shop which is in possession of petitioner- Pawan Kumar as tenant and respondents No.4 to 8, who have Crl. Misc. No. M-21310 of 2009 -2- alleged to purchase the disputed shop and got registered a case for getting the vacant possession of the shop by putting pressure of the false case. It has further been mentioned in the reply that it was found that a false case has been registered by the complainant Ashok Kumar against Pawan Kumar. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, no further action is required. The petitioner has become infructuous. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. January 14, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE