IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.2754 of 2010 Date of decision: 04.02.2013 Rai Singh … Petitioner Versus UT, Chandigarh and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. K.K. Gupta, Advocate for the UT, Chandigarh. ... SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) On 17.01.2013, no one was present on behalf of the petitioner. However, in the interest of justice, the case was adjourned to 30.01.2013 and the registry was directed to inform the counsel for the petitioner about the adjourned date. As per the office report, counsel for the petitioner has been informed. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner even today. Dismissed for non-prosecution. (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE ( AMOL RATTAN SINGH) February 04, 2013 JUDGE sk