1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4570 of 2009 ( South East Central Railway vs. Kalpana wd/o. Ruplal Meshram and Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr.M.M.Sudame, Adv. for petitioner. Mr.A.M.Quazi, Adv. for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Mr.A.Z.Jibhkate, Adv. for respondent nos.3 and 4. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : AUGUST 09, 2010. The efforts to settle the controversy amicably were going on between the parties since the last some dates. Respondent nos. 1, 3 and 4 have today, along with their respective Counsel, tendered the terms for amicable settlement. Respondent No.2 is minor and respondent no.1 is present on his behalf. Parties are identified by their respective Counsel i.e. Mr.A.M.Quzai, for respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Mr.A.Z.Jibhkate, Adv. for respondent nos. 3 and 4. They state that the terms are duly explained to the parties. It is pointed out by them that clause no.3 of the terms of settlement is cancelled by the consent of all. Mr. M.M.Sudame, Adv. states that, insofar as apportionment of gratuity amount is concerned, the petitioners/Railways have no problem. However, 2 pension payment order will be released in the name of first wife i.e. respondent no. 3 and respondent no.3 will then be responsible for further distribution of pension amount or arrears of pension amongst the rival claimants. The respondents have no objection even to this arrangement. The terms are accordingly taken on record and the petition is disposed of by making the rule absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. JUDGE jais