HC—78 3^? -^ww^, •a-i^wie, Ri^i'yy __ .....V.:'&.f<G>.^..9l2.^S.. tn-cR'iT g^f^--"-t-'9/-!"-;"-^--y->/"u--^ 200 an^CT'R9? (•yt'l'iiiw) a^ SD^T Tf R;-<i+ '?TSH 3TT^T sh*flq> ^.-. s+<fl^R •^f?^t sn^T PETITIONER/: Respondent No. 4 RESPONDENTS/: Petitioner Versuls 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (Writ Petition under Art' cfrl^Id'iil'l *im^ ^f^fe^ <f<T4^K ^sifinan^i Matin Khan, S/o Abdul Rashid, Aged about 37 years, Occupation - Counsellor of Municipal Council Kanker, Caste - O.B.C. Muslim, R/o Mahadev Ward, Kanker, Distt. North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) Najib Ahmed Qureshi, S/o Rafiq Ahmed Qureshi, Aged about 40 years, Caste - Kasai, R/o Mahadev Ward, Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C,G.) Chhattisgarh State Election Commission, Through Chjef Election Officer, Raipur (C.G.) The District Election OfRcer/Collector Kanker - C.G. The Municipal Committee, Kanker (C.G.),Through Chief Munidpal Officer, Kanker-(C.G.) Mohammad Hanif, S/o Late Hazi Mohammad Ismaiel Hazi Latif, Aged about 32 years, R/o Mahadev Ward, 'Kanker, Distt. North Bastar Kanker-(C.G.) Mahafuj Ali, S/o Mabud Ali, Aged about 25 years, By Caste - Julaha Muslim, R/o Mahadev Ward, Kanker, C.G. j;le 227 ofthe Constitution of India) ». ^ ^/ Sl<*' -78 < -1-^=1 -yi^ici-ii, »Tn<H'is,Rciiiy^ 'WRTT *Mlcb "Wt 200 wvs ?n •RTN? Wisntn-anN; 6 an^r'<RW CS?f3^?) Sina!eBteniChLHt»n'bleMr. Justice L.C. Bhadoo' 08^1-2008:- Shri R.R. Sinha, counsf Heard on admission. The petitioner has preft tionstitution of tndia has quest dated 19.9.2007 passed by North Bastar (Kanker) in ele Additional District Judge has holding that defect in veriTicat the C.P.C. is curable and on dismissed. The leamed Addl. to rectity the default pointed that defect in verification i.e. n< is curable defect and such defl The order of the tearned A(j jurisdictional error. In the result, the petitioil and it is hereby dismissed. ct»l'4i<'i^h^i*K;i?^'f^st <t^regR ^3Tfil»T3II^I for the petitioner. !|rred this writ petition under Article 227 of the ;|oned the legality and correctness of the order le^rned Additional District Judge, Kanker, Distt. le|;tion petition No. 4/6, whereby the learned r^jected the application ofthe petitioner herein i^n i.e. non-compliance of Order 6 Rule 15 of laccount of the defect the petition cannot be |>istrict Judge has further directed the petitioner o|ut by the respondent No. 4. It is setUed law tn-compliance ofthe Order 6 Rule 15 ofC.P.C. ict does not entait the dismissal of the petition. |dl. District Judg®does not suffer from any being devoid of merit is liable to be dismissed Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge