IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-8744 of 2010 Date of decision : 12.10.2010 Baldev Singh and others ...Petitioners versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. G.S. Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Shilesh Gupta, D.A.G., Punjab. Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned State Counsel has pointed out that charges have been framed in this case and the petition is not maintainable in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in Minakshi Bala v. Sudhir Sharma 1994 (3) RCR Criminal 123. 2. Faced with the situation, learned counsel intends to withdraw the present petition to enable the petitioners to avail their appropriate remedy for challenging the order of framing charge before the Sessions Judge along with application of condonation of delay or at any subsequent stage in the trial Court. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Needless to say that the concerned Court would consider the application for condonation of delay sympathetically. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) Judge October 12, 2010 naresh.k