IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 28TH OCTOBER 2008 / 6TH KARTHIKA 1930 RP.No. 1130 of 2008(G) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN CRP.63/2008 Dated 18/03/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/REVISION PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT IN IA 173/04: --------------------------------------------------- V.S. OMANA, AGED 58, W/O. KUNJAPPAN, VALIYAPURAKKAL HOUSE, EDAVANAKKAD, ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS. SRI.KKM.SHERIF SRI.P.M.KUNJUMOIDEENKUTTY SRI.A.A.ZIYAD RAHMAN SRI.LAL K.JOSEPH SMT.SHEENA SAMUEL RESPONDENT/PETITIONER IN I.A. 173/07/RESPONDENTS/2 TO 5 IN I.A. 173/07: --------------------------------------- 1. PARAMESHWARAN, AGED 61, S/O. KESHAVAN, KOLETHARA, EDAPALLY NORTH, ERNAKULAM. 2. V.S. BABY, AGED 55, S/O. SHANKARAN, VEMPILLY HOUSE, EDAVANAKKADU, ERNAKULAM. 3. V.S. MOHANAN, AGED 48, S/O. SHANKARAN, VEMPILLY HOUSE, EDAVANAKKADU, ERNAKULAM. 4. V.S. THAMPI, AGED 46, S/O. SHANKARAN, VEMPILLY HOUSE, EDAVANAKKADU, ERNAKULAM. 5. V.S. ANILKUMAR, AGED 40, S/O. SHANKARAN, VEMPILLY HOUSE,, EDAVANAKKADU, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI. K.P. SATHEESAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN, J ----------------------- R.P.No. 1130 OF 2008 --------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of October, 2008 ORDER Perused the judgment dated 18.3.2008 passed by me and also memorandum of Revision Petition. I have considered and had taken a view basing upon the materials which I thought was proper. I do not find any error apparent on the face of the record which calls for review. Therefore Review Petition is dismissed. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE vkm