IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER MONDAY, THE 14TH JULY 2008 / 23RD ASHADHA 1930 W.A.No. 689 of 2008 ---------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN W.P.(C).7057/2008 DATED 28/02/2008 .................... APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS:- ----------------------------------------- 1. AMINA, W/O.MOIDEENKUTTY, ALIKKAL HOUSE, KAKKOOTH, VALIYANGADI, PERINTHALMANNA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. SUHARA, D/O.MOIDEENKUTTY, ALIKKAL HOUSE, KAKKOOTH, VALIYANGADI, PERINTHALMANNA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. ZUBAIDA, D/O.MOIDEENKUTTY, ALIKKAL HOUSE, KAKKOOTH, VALIYANGADI, PERINTHALMANNA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.MUHAMMED SALAHUDHEEN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:- ----------------------------------------------- 1. THE URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE MANAGER, URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.KRISHNA MENON SRI.E.K.MADHAVAN SMT.P.VIJAYAMMA SRI.DEVIDAS.U.K THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:- H.L.Dattu,C.J. & A.K.Basheer,J. ---------------------------------------------- W.A.No.689 of 2008 ----------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 14th day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT Basheer, J. This Writ Appeal, which is at the instance of the writ petitioners, is directed against the following interim order passed by the learned Single Judge: “Notice and interim stay for four months on condition that the petitioner deposits at the rate of Rs.20,000/- per month, on or before 10th of every month, commencing from March 2008”. 2. When this Writ Appeal came up for consideration, this Court had granted interim stay of the orders passed by the learned Single Judge. Now, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents that the appellants have not complied with the interim directions issued by the learned Single Judge. 3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the view that the Writ Appeal need not be kept pending. It would be appropriate that the parties would approach the learned Single Judge for appropriate modification of the orders passed by the Court. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is closed. 5. In view of the orders passed in the Writ Appeal, I.A.No.628 of 2008 is closed. H.L.Dattu Chief Justice A.K.Basheer vku/- Judge