1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 227 OF 2009. The State of Maharashtra. ...Applicant. VERSUS. Balu Deoram Shinde and others. ...Respondents. ------------------------------------------ Mrs. Y.M.Kishrsagar, A.P.P. for applicant. Mr.R.S.Shejul,Advocate,h/f Mr. R. D. Bhalerao Advocate for respondent no. 1 to 3. ------------------------------------------ (CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR, J ) DATE : 7th September,2009. PER COURT : 1. Heard. Mr. R. D. Bhalerao Advocate for respondents is absent. On his behalf Shri R. S. Shejual requested for adjournment. Request rejected. 2. There is delay of five days, which is duly explained. It is marginal and unintentional, hence the delay is condoned. 3. Considering the prima facie evidence regarding injuries found on the person of deceased Smt.Nirmla and the version of Medical Officer Mr. Lahori(P.W.6), it appears that, the matter requires consideration. The defence of the accused persons was that the deceased Smt Nirmla was suffering from epilepsy and had gone to the Well for taking bath. According to defence, she died out of accidental death. In view of injuries found on her person, which were 2 of ante-mortem, I deem to proper to grant leave. 4. Leave granted. 5. Admit. 6. Print is dispensed with. 7. Call for Record and proceedings. ( V.R.KINGAONKAR, J ) MTK/cri.227.09