}<Qd z--- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^ ^^ / 2011 PETITIONER /" y""'.. '..%..•••:" <\^,^^f^- °^^--f"' ^o* ^ESPONDENTS Manker Usendi, S/o. Shri Chamru Ram Usendi, Aged about 29 years, Post Forest Guard, R/o. Village Darbha, Post & Tahsil Darbha, District Bastar (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). The Deputy Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur (C.G.). The Conservator of Forest, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). The District Forest Officer, Bastar Division, District Bastar (C.G.). The Range Officer, Chandmeta Koleng Range, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^4. •)( -":"2.^.^^^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR PETmONER WRTT PETmON (S) No. 6979 of2011 Manker Usendi. RE8PONDENTS VER8U8 State ofChhattisgarh & Otfiers, ) Amit WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmmON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Atanu Ohosh, Advocate for Ifae petitioner Shri Amn Sao, Govemment Advocate forfhe State/respondents ORDER (Passed on 24th day ofNovember, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that vide prder dated 15.07.2010 (Annexure P/l), the petitioner, working as Forest Guard at Chandmeta, Koleng Range, Forest Division Jagdalpur to Narayanpur Raiige, Forest DivisioiL Narayanpun on his ovm request. Howeven the petitioner has not yet be^i relieved to Join the new place of posting. Shri Ghosh fiirther submits fhat once Ifae order oftraiisfer has been passed, it is for the goyemmeiit to eiisure that it is complied with immediately. He relies on a decision offhe Supreme Court in Sreedam Chandra Ghosh v. State ofAssam & others1, in support ofhis contentioatibiat ifthe order is not complied with, a direction can be issued for enforcement thereof. 2. Leamed counsel appeanng for the State/respondents submits fhat that ifthe transfer order dated 15.07.2010 (Amiexure P/l) is still in existence and has not been complied wifh, appropriate steps would be taken to comply wifh the order. 3. Iffhe aforesaid transfer order is still in exist^ice and xio other order has been passed in respect ofthe petitionen the govemment is under an obligation to comply witii Ihe same at once. It is accordingly directed tfaat tiie transfer order shall be complied with forfhwitihL within a period oftwo weeks. 4. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. g^y Satish K. Agnihotri Judge <f ^' 1 (1996)108cc 567