IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10431 of 2010 ABHAY KUMAR SINGH, S/O LATE TAPESHWAR SINGH, R/O VILLAGE DAULATPUR DIH, P.O. DAULATPUR GANDHI TOLA, P.S. GAURICHAK, DISTRICT- PATNA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT,PATNA. 2. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVT.OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NALANDA. 4. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, BIHARSHARIF, DISTRICT- NALANDA. 5. DIRECTOR PROVIDENT FUND,BIHAR PANT BHAWAN BAILEY ROAD,PATNA. 6. DISTRICT GENERAL PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, BIHARSHARIF,NALANDA. 7. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY DEFENCE, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 8. DIRECTOR GENERAL NATIONAL CADET CORPS, NEW DELHI. 9. DIRECTOR NATIONAL CADET CORPS, BIHAR , C.D.A. BUILDING KADAM KUAN,PATNA. 10. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL,BIHAR ,PATNA. ----------- 3 29.07.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner claims to be the son of the deceased employee namely, Tapeshwar Singh, who died in harness on 10th December, 1981 while working as a Clerk in the office of the District Superintendent of Education, Nalanda. It is submitted that after the death of the father of the petitioner the gratuity and amount of group insurance was paid, however the provident fund dues and the amount of leave encashment was not paid. From the representation dated 19th December, 2008 as contained in Annexure-6 serious it appears that the widow later on started getting the provisional pension and while she was getting the provisional pension mother of the petitioner died on 05.06.2005. Learned counsel for the State submits that the claim of the petitioner needs to be verified from the records. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.4 with copy the respondent nos. 6, 9 & 10. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the representation of the petitioner shall be considered and disposed of by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representation. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)