IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.59 of 2007 1.MALTI KUMARI wife of Yogendra Rai, Resident of Village Mahmadpur Deopar, P.S. Pusa, District Samastipur. 2. Reena Devi wife of Pawan Kumar Thakur, Resident of village Mahamadpur Depoar, P.S. Pusa, District Samastipur.. Petitioners/Appellants Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Secretary, Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The Director I.C.D.S. Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna, Indira Building 2nd floor Ram Charitra Singh Path, Patna 4. The Collector, Samastipur 5. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Samastipur 6. The District Welfare Officer, Samastipur 7. The C.D.P.O. Pusa, Samastipur… ……. Respondents For the petitioners : Mr. Aditya Prakash Sahay, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. GP-I and AC to GP-I ………. 8 07.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the State. This Letters Patent Appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 02.05.2006 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court, whereby the writ petition preferred by the petitioners has been dismissed after considering the relevant facts. The case of the petitioners would have succeeded 2 only if the writ court could have been persuaded to accept the facts claimed by the petitioners. The writ court has considered the cases of the parties and accepted the reasons given by the authorities for terminating the engagement of the petitioners as Anganwari Sevika and Sahayika. The proceeding of Aam Sabha held on 21.09.2004 has not been accepted by the authorities because of stand and report of the C.D.P.O. that Up-Mukhiya ran away with the proceeding book when his candidate was not accepted by the Aam Sabha. All the relevant facts show that the writ court rightly placed reliance upon the reasons given by the authorities. No interference was required in this matter because it would have amounted to investigation into highly disputed facts. Since we have found that the writ petition has been rightly dismissed, there is no occasion but to dismiss this Letters Patent Appeal, which is accordingly dismissed. Sanjay-II (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)