IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35273 of 2007 RAJU KUMAR @ RAJ KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6. 3.9.2008 Heard. The petitioner is the husband and is alleged to be carrying illicit relationship with the co-accused, who happens his Bhabi and both of them are alleged further to have conspired together in administering poison to the deceased, wife of the petitioner. While the deceased was rushing to the hospital for her treatment, she fell into a ditch and drowned and was killed. The visera report appears at flag-A and it appears that Thimet was detected in the visera. The contention is that the petitioner was not present at the house. But the material indicates that he might have instructed his paramour (Bhabi) to administer the poison. At any rate the part of the story regarding the connivance of the petitioner could not minimize his role in the offence when it is viewed that it was the wife of the petitioner who was killed. The petition is dismissed. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )