IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2763 of 2011 AMARNATH PASWAN SON OF LAKSHMI PASWAN. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 27.04.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not made an accused in the First Information Report and it appears that the petitioner was identified by the informant in Test Identification Parade and it is alleged that on the basis of confessional statement of the petitioner the looted Motorcycle was recovered from lonely place. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the Test Identification Parade was held after two months of the alleged occurrence and as a matter of fact nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner and so far as the alleged confessional statement is concerned, the same is nothing but only the high handedness of police. It is admitted position that petitioner was not known to the informant prior to the alleged occurrence and the alleged occurrence took place in the night at about 8:00 P.M. and there was no source of identification. Considering the aforesaid facts as well as submissions of the parties, particularly this aspect of the matter that the petitioner was put on Test Identification Parade after two months of the alleged occurrence, let the above named petitioner 2 be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 250 of 2010 corresponding to G.R. No. 2365 of 2010. Ibrar/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)