IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28532 of 2008 SANTOSH MANDAL @ SANTOSH KUMAR MANDAL Son of Jagdish Mandal, resident of Village Hingwa, P.S. Raniganj, District Araria Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 29.9.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused for the offences registered under sections 304B/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that the petitioner along with his other family members immediately after six months of the marriage of the daughter of the informant started torturing her for dowry. Further allegation is that the deceased died in her matrimonial home. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the deceased was short tempered lady and used to quarrel on trivial issue. It is further submitted that the police after investigation has submitted charge sheet under section 306 of the Indian Penal Code and not under section 304 B. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that during investigation, the witnesses have supported the 2 case for offence under section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the nature of allegations and the submission of the parties, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)