/ 1 / IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.850 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.724 OF 2008 Mohammed Mainuddin Shaikh & Anr. ...Appellants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondents --- Ms. Anjali Patil for Appellants Shri P.A. Pol, PP for Respondents ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 29TH SEPTEMBER,2008 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant and the Learned Counsel for the State. The Appellant has been convicted by the Trial Court for the offence punishable under sections 395, 397 r/w. 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The appeal has been admitted. The Appellant was on bail during trial. It is submitted that only evidence against the present Appellant that cash amount had been recovered from him. It is further submitted that the Accused has been released on bail by this Court. 2. The learned APP appearing on behalf of the State submits that the Appellant has no permanent address of his residence in Mumbai. On the other hand, the learned Counsel for the Accused submits that the Accused / 2 / has attended the police station during pendency of appeal and has not been absconded. She further undertakes to file an affidavit for the permanent address of the Accused within one week from today. 3. Since the other co-accused have been released on bail and the only allegation against the Appellant is that the cash amount had been recovered from him. Taking into consideration that the Appellant has not absconded during pendency of the trial, the Accuseed is released on bail with the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount subject to the condition that he shall remain present before the Malad Police Station once in a week during pendency of the appeal. 4. Application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. V.M. KANADE J.