IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.4249 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: September 24, 2009. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. ...Appellant(s) v. Nishant Sharma & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri V. Ramswaroop, Advocate, for the appellant. ORDER Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): The contention of learned counsel for the appellant is that the driver of the offending vehicle was not holding an effective driving licence as according to Ex.R5, he was entitled to drive a Light Motor Vehicle only, whereas the offending vehicle was a Heavy Motor Vehicle. However, from the perusal of the impugned award, I find that no such argument was raised before the Tribunal. Learned counsel has vehemently stated that the said point was argued before the Tribunal, but the same has not been discussed. I have perused the Grounds of Appeal as well as the impugned award, however, even in the Grounds of Appeal no such ground has been raised by the appellant that the aforesaid point was raised before the Tribunal and the same has not been discussed. In view of the aforesaid, I am not inclined to interfere in the award of the Tribunal. Dismissed. September 24, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge