CRM- M 32750 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M 32750 of 2011 Date of decision : November 29, 2011 Gurpiar Singh, ...... Petitioner v. State of Punjab, ...... Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Achin Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Gill, DAG Punjab Mr. Tejinder Pal, Advocate for the complainant. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in case FIR No.03, dated 13.1.2010, registered under Sections 302/34 of the IPC, at Police Station Budhlada. ASI Kuldeep Singh is present in Court and expresses his regret for the wrong statement made on 26.9.2011 which he says was due to a communication gap. In the circumstances, I deem it appropriate to accept this explanation as well as his regrets. Counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner has CRM- M 32750 of 2011 ::2:: now been in custody for more than one year and 10 months and that he has not been attributed the fatal injury. Counsel for the respondent, as well as counsel for the complainant have argued that only two witnesses remain to be examined and that the matter is now fixed for 1.12.2011. Be that as it may, considering the fact that admittedly the fatal injury is not attributed to the petitioner and the person to whom this injury is attributed is still in custody, without commenting upon the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner. Bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, Mansa. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) November 29, 2011. JUDGE `kk'