IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2009 / 15TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 325 of 2009(L) PETITIONER: --------------- MULUKE U, JUNIOR ARABIC TEACHER, ALP SCHOOL, KALOOR, PUTHUPALLI PO. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.GANGESH SMT.SMITHA CHATHANARAMBATH RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE DEO, TIRUR, 2. THE AEO , TIRUR. 3. THE MANAGER, ALP SCHOOL, KALOOR, PUTHUPALLI P.O., TIRUR. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) NO. 325 OF 2009 L ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 5th January, 2009 JUDGMENT The reliefs prayed for by the petitioner are the following: “(i) issue a Writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash Ext.P2 order passed by the 2nd respondent. (ii) issue a Writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash Ext.P6 order passed by the 1st respondent. (iii) issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 2nd respondent to approve the appointment of 2nd respondent as Junior Arabic Teacher at ALP School, Kaloor as evidenced by Ext.P1 forthwith. (iv) any other appropriate writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and allot this petition with all costs.” 2. It is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that against Ext.P6 order a revision lies before the Director of Public Instruction. That a revision lies against Ext.P6 order is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted by him that the revision lies before the Government also. Wherever the revision lies, it is admitted by both sides that a revision will lie and that revision is the statutory remedy. Therefore, the petitioner is allowed to file the statutory revision. It is W.P.(C) NO.325 OF 2009 L :: 2 :: submitted by the learned Government Pleader that if a revision is filed properly by the petitioner within a period of two weeks, the same would be considered by the appropriate authority as expeditiously as possible and, at any rate, within a period of three months. The submission made by the learned Government Pleader is recorded and the Writ Petition is closed. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/