IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No.443 of 2010 Fathaih Singh Saransi ……Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others .…Respondents Sri Atul Bahuguna, learned counsel for the petitioner Sri S.S. Adhikari, learned A.G.A. for the State/respondent nos. 1 to 5. Dated 12th July, 2010 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J. By way of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner who is complainant in the case crime No.100/2009 under sections 420, 442, 451, 120B and Section 323/504/506 I.P.C. at police station Nehru colony, Dehradun, has prayed for issuing a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent Nos. 4 & 5 to conclude the investigation free and impartially as expeditiously as possible or in alternate to transfer the matter to C.B.C.I.D. Heard Sri Atul Bahuguna, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri S.S. Adhikari, learned A.G.A. for the State/respondent nos. 1 to 5 and perused the record. On 15.06.2010, learned A.G.A. was directed to obtain the report with regard to latest status of the investigation in the matter and today Sri S.S. Adhikari, learned A.G.A. has submitted that police after investigation of the case have submitted the final report on 22.06.2010. The report of 2 Investigating Officer, P.S. Kotwali, Dehradun produced by the learned A.G.A. be taken on record. In view of the aforesaid fact, we do not find any merit in the writ petition, as there is no occasion to issue any writ in the nature of mandamus to respondents at this stage. The writ petition is dismissed being infructuous. (Nirmal Yadav, J.) (B.C. Kandpal, J.) JKJ 12.07.2010