1912cwp555.11 1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No. 555/2011 Mungsaji Datta Thakre Vs. State of Maharashtra and one. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. Mr. P.S. Jaiswal, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. T.A. Mirza, APP for the respondents 1 & 2. CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & P.B.VARALE,JJ DATE : 19.12.2011 This is a petition, which takes exception to an order passed by the authorities rejecting the application of the petitioner dated 30.3.2011 seeking extension of parole. It appears that the petitioner had been released on parole on 25.3.2011 for 30 days. The parole was to expire on 25.4.2011. In the meanwhile, on 30.3.2011 the petitioner had applied for extension of his parole on the ground that his wife was suffering from stomach ailment. The respondents by order dated 25.5.2011 rejected the application of the petitioner on the ground that neither the medical certificate nor the application of the petitioner disclosed that the wife of the petitioner was suffering from some serious ailments. On notice being issued to the respondents, the respondents have filed their affidavit-in-reply. The 1912cwp555.11 2` learned APP Mr. Mirza points out to us that the medical certificate submitted by the petitioner only disclose that the wife of the petitioner was suffering from some stomach problem without disclosing the nature of the ailment. It is further urged before us that the petitioner had surrendered on 25.4.2011. We have examined the affidavit-in-reply as well as contentions of the petitioner. Upon such consideration, we are of the opinion that no case for interference is made out and consequently, this writ petition is dismissed. The petitioner, however, is at liberty to apply afresh for parole on the ground that his wife is suffering from serious ailment, provided that the petitioner is entitled in law to make such an application. In the event, an application is submitted by the petitioner, the respondents shall decide the same in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. In the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE Ambulkar