IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2098 of 2011 Upendra Kumar Singh, son of Sri Tripit Narayan Singh, resident of village Abdulla Chak, P.O. Usafa, P.S. Fatuha, District Patna, at present posted at Narayani Girls High School, Patna City, District Patna as Assistant … Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Sri Anup Mukharjee, the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna 2. Sri Rameshwar Singh, the Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna 3. Sri S.K.Negi, the Principal Secretary, Department of Co- operative, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna 4. Sri Narsingh Upadhya, the Registrar, Department of Co- operative, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna 5. Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, the District Magistrate, Patna 6. Smt. Kiran Kumari, the District Education Officer, Patna … Contemnor/ Opp.Parties ---------------------------------- 3. 7.12.2011 Having heard counsel for the parties and taking into account that after the order of this Court the opposite parties by the specific order dated 13.7.2010 had taken a policy decision in the following terms: ^^mi;qZDr rF;ksa ds vkyksd esa fof/k foHkkx ,oa foRr foHkkx ds ijke'kZ ds vuq:i ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky;] iVuk ds vkns'kkuqikyu esa mi;qZDr of.kZr lgdkfjrk izcU/kdksa ds fy, vk;ksftr fo'ks"k ijh{kk esa lQy oSls mEehnokj] ftudh fu;qfDr i`FkDdhdj.k dh frfFk vFkkZr 20-12-200 ds i'pkr fuEuoxhZ; fyfid] osrueku 3050&4590 :0 esa fofHkUu foHkkxksa ds v/khu dh xbZ gS] dks mudh fu;qfDr dh frfFk ls gh mPpoxhZ; fyfid] osrueku 4000&6000 :0 dh Lohd`fr iznku dh tkrh gSA rn~uqlkj lEcfU/krksa ds cdk;k osrukfn dk Hkqxrku Hkh lqfuf'pr fd;k tk,A** and the specific stand of the Registrar of the Co-operative Society contained in his letter No. 3536 dated 1.8.2011 communicating the Collector of Patna District that the case of the petitioner also stands covered by the aforesaid extracted decision of the Government contained in its order Memo No. 3814 dated 2 13.7.2010, it has to be held that the direction given by this Court has already been complied. As a consequence of fixation of pay of the petitioner in the pay scale of Rs. 4,000 to 6000 when the opposite parties have also been paying current salary to him in the upgraded/ revised pay scale of Rs. 4,000 to 6000 it is always expected that the admissible financial benefit by way of arrears which has also accrued to him by virtue of the same order of the State Government contained in Memo No. 3814 dated 13.7.2010, shall also be extended to the petitioner whenever the same would be extended to his other counter parts in whose cases such decision was taken earlier. It is accordingly made clear that if such arrears have been paid to others including the petitioners of the case of Ganesh Singh & ors. vs. the State of Bihar & ors., reported in 2007(1) PLJR 159, whose case was made the basis for allowing the prayer of the petitioner, the same must be extended also to the petitioner. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/