IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37176 of 2010 DHRUV JAISWAL @ DHRUV KUMAR JAISWAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 25.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Admittedly, the complainant is tenant in the house of the petitioner. It is said that on 17.05.1999 at about 12.30 P.M. petitioner entered the house of complainant and tried to establish sexual relationship with her. The complainant raised alarm which attracted the witnesses and, thereafter, petitioner assaulted the complainant and others as also committed theft of belongings and thereafter fled away from there. It appears that the petitioner preferred Cr. Misc. No. 32216 of 1999 for quashing the proceeding, but the aforesaid Cr. Misc. was disposed of by this Court on 17.05.2010 and, thereafter, petitioner preferred this Cr. Misc. case before this Court. The contention of learned counsel for the 2 petitioner is that the aforesaid complaint case was lodged on account of tenancy dispute and the story as propounded by the complainant is highly improbable. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance as well as submissions of the petitioner, namely, Dhruv Jaiswal @ Dhruv Kumar Jaiswal, in the event of his arrest / surrender within 30 days from the date of communication of this order to the concerned court in connection with C.A. No.1092 of 1999, shall be released on bail furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. PN ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)