1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION No.1313/2006. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, office Memoranda of Coram Court's or Judge's appearances, Court's orders or directions order and Registrar's order. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= CORAM: C.L.PANGARKAR,J. DATE : 21st February, 2008. 1. Heard Mr.S.P.Palshikar, learned counsel for the appellant. 2. It appears from the contents of the application that the Second appeal No.155/89 came to be dismissed for not filing synopsis within time stipulated by the court. Since the appeal came to be dismissed, the appellant had moved an application for restoration of the same. That application was filed along with delay condonation application. On the day application came to be dismissed, it was listed for filing reply of other side. Since it was fixed for filing of the reply, the appellant was under impression that the matter may not be heard on that day. But before appellant reached to the court, the appeal was 2 dismissed for default. Now, that order is sought to be set aside and prayer is made for restoration of that application to file. 3. Considering the fact that the matter was shown as listed for filing reply, the impression of the counsel that it is fixed for filing reply and not for hearing was justified. In view of this, the dismissal order passed by this court is set aside and the delay condonation application along with restoration application are allowed. The appeal stands restored to file. JUDGE pzc