IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15464 of 2011 SURESH YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 25.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. It is alleged that one country made loaded Katta was recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner and subsequently when the house of the petitioner was searched, several fire arms were recovered. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that, petitioner is languishing in jail custody for near about seven and half months and so far as, the recovery is concerned, the same has been made from joint house of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions of the parties I do not feel it proper to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Thakraha P. S. Case No. 104/2010 pending in the court of A.C.J.M Bagaha, Dist- West Champaran stands rejected. The learned Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial of the petitioner within seven months from the date of receipt of this order. It is made clear that if the trial of the petitioner in not concluded within the above stated period, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before learned trial 2 Court itself and the learned Trial Court shall pass order on bail petition of petitioner if it is so filed, considering his period of detention as well as keeping in mind the provision laid down under Section 436A of the Criminal Procedure Code. Namita ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)