IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 8TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 29015 of 2008(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. CHELLAMMA. D/O. KOCHAPPI AMMA, AGECD 78 YEARS, BUNGLOVIL PUTHEN VEEDU, MARANGATTUKONAM, VALAKAM VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. CHANDRASEKHARA PILLAI,S/O.NARAYANA - PILLAI, BUNGLOVIL PUTHANVEEDU, MARANGATTUKONAM VALAKAM VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. K.SIJU SRI.PRATHEESH.P RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR, SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS, VAZHUTHAKKADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 3. DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS, COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM. 4. TALUK SURVEYOR, KOTTARAKKARA. 5. THAHASILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KOTTARAKKARA. 6. VILLAGE OFFICER, VALAKOM VILLAGE, VALAKOM P.O., KOTTARAKKARA. BY GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).29015/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 30th day of September, 2008 JUDGMENT Aggrieved by what the petitioners call as “mistake committed by the re-survey Officials” in fixing the boundary of the property belonging to the petitioners, mother and son, they have approached the fourth respondent with Exts.P5 and P6 applications. Said applications are maintainable in terms of the provisions of the Survey and Boundaries Act. Appropriate decision is to be taken by the fourth respondent on the applications, without delay. 2. In the result, writ petition is disposed of directing the fourth respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P5 and P6 in accordance with law, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs