-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 114 OF 2005 Mahadev Bapu Pawar... ...... Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors... ... Respondents. Mr.Machintra Patil for the Petitioner. Ms.D.S.Cardoza, AGP for the State. Mr.Nitin Jadhav with Mr. Jamdar for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J. SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J. SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J. DATED : 11TH JULY, 2007. DATED : 11TH JULY, 2007. DATED : 11TH JULY, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent State submits that the respondents will treat the writ petition as a representation to the Competent Authority and after inspection of the site they would pass appropriate order in relation to the prayers made by the petitioner in this writ petition. 2. In view of the statement made, we do not think it appropriate for this court to keep this petition pending. Let the order be passed by the Chief Executive Engineer concerned within two months from today. -: 2 :- 3. This petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J. SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J. SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.