WP(C) 6080/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.P.KATAKEY Heard Mr BK Sen, learned counsel for petitioner, as well as Ms Deka, learned sta nding counsel for public works department appearing for the respondents. The petitioner, in the present petition, has prayed for a direction to t he respondent authorities to pay him a sum of Rs.3,51,428/-(rupees three lakh fi fty-one thousand four hundred twenty-eight) which, according to him, is due and payable for the works executed by him. According to petitioner, he was allotted three works; and though works w ere executed to the fullest satisfaction and bills for an amount of Rs.10,87,528 /-(rupees ten lakh eighty-seven thousand five hundred twenty-eight) were submitt ed, he was paid an amount of Rs.7,36,100/-(rupees seven lakh thirty-six thousand one hundred) only, leaving a balance Rs.3,51,428/-(rupees three lakh fifty-one thousand four hundred twenty-eight), which has not been paid as yet. Petitioner therefore prayed for a direction as noticed above. Learned standing counsel for the PWD appearing for respondents submitted that the petitioner would be paid his dues, if any, whenever his turn comes, in terms of the directions contained in the order dated 27th April 2007 passed in WP(C) no.1918/2007, as well as in the judgment in Tamsher Ali vs. State of Assam & others, 2008 (4) GLT 1. It appears that the petitioner earlier approached this Court in WP(C) no .1918/2007, which was disposed of vide order dated 27th April 2007 directing the public works department to register the name of the petitioner, provided any am ount is due and payable to him. A further direction was also issued to arrange t he contractors in the separate heads of accounts and whenever fund is received t o make payment chronologically. A full Bench of this Court, in Tamsher Ali vs. S tate of Assam and others, had also issued similar directions. In the present petition, it is not the case of petitioner that his name has not been registered or though registered, chronology has not been maintained in making payment. That being the position, no direction, as sought for, can be issued to t he respondent authorities. Respondents may make payment to the petitioner, provi ded any amount is due and payable, in accordance with law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.