BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the First day of March Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.T.SELVAM CRL OP(MD) No.2477 of 2011 R.ANGAMUTHU ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED -2 Vs. THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEDASANTHUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. CRIME NO.679/2010 ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.MATHIYALAGAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.RAJENDRAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section366(A) of IPC, in Crime No.679 of 2010, seeking anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C. 2. Heard Mr.R.Mathiyalagan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Rajendran, learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent State. 3. The case of the prosecution is that one Periyasamy lodged a complaint before the respondent police that on 25.12.2010 his daughter Pandiamma aged about 17 years has been kidnapped by one Vijayakumar, with the inducement of the petitioner and others. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the father of the said Vijayakumar and he never induced Vijayakumar to abduct Pandiamma. He would further submit that the petitioner has nothing to do with the offence alleged in the complaint. He would also submit that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. 5. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) would oppose grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6. Considering the fact that the son of the petitioner who is the first accused had a love affair with the de-facto complainant's daughter and they had gone missing, consequent to which this petitioner had arrayed as Accused 2, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Magistrate concerned, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vedasanthur, and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks. sd/- 01/03/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VEDASANTHUR. 2 -Do-Thro' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEDASANTHUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S. R.MATHIYALAGAN Advocate SR.No.10826 akm/03.03.11 /2p-6c/ ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.2477 of 2011 Date :01/03/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/