IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 22128 of 2005 Between: M/s Marcopolo Travels, rep.by its Proprietor Prithvi raj, S/o Gyan Singh, Aged, 32 years, R/o 5-9-7/3, Saifabad, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh, Limited, rep.by its Compounding Authority, (Vigilance) AP.T.S., Team-II, A.P. TRANSCO, Vidyut Southa, Hyderabad. 2. The Assistant Divsisonal engineer, Electrical/ Operations, Division No.I, City I, AP., TRANSCO, Hyderabad 3. The Assistant Accounts Officer, ERO-V, Mint Compound, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS * * * ORDER: This writ petition has been filed to declare the impugned demand notice issued by the third respondent, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Sections 39 and 41 of the Indian Electricity Act. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that though he complied with the interim direction of this Court in W.P.No.19058 of 2000 passed on 04.10.2000, the respondents, without any prior notice, disconnected power supply to his premises. In spite of his representation dated 28.09.2005 to the second respondent for restoration of power supply to his premises, the respondents have not considered his representation. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 4. Appropriate decision has to be taken by the respondents on the representation dated 28.09.2005 of the petitioner. 5. Therefore, without going into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to take appropriate decision on the representation dated 28.09.2005 of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ________________ K.C.BHANU, J. Date: 07th October 2005. BSB