C^L- INGLE BENSi IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTZSGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR W.P. 1 S) No.'^^O^ /2010 PBTITIONER: ^ ^ ,^/' ^y^/ / A^i^ a^?y ^•^y ^y^yy'" /<VA1/%'/ ^yy ,^' A<s ^ ^^y RBSPONDENTS: ^ Subhang Shrivasatava S/o Shri Mithilesh Kumar Shrivasatava Aged about 21 years Occupation -Lower Division Clerk Officeof Deputy Director of Agricu.ltu.re, Bijapur District-Bijapur (C.G.) VBRSUS l.State of Chhattisgarh Through, Secretary , Department of Agriculture Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Deputy Director , Agriculture, Bijapur District - Bijapur ( C.G.) ^- ...-•l, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETmON (S) No. 'TO03 o£26lQ Subhaug Shrivastava. VERSUS State ofChhatti^arh & Another. WMT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226^227 OF THE CONSTmJTIQN 'INDIA -- • -.:.--: - ---^ SB: Bfon'bIeShriSatishK.AenllMtAJ. Present: Ms.DeepaliPandey,AdvoeideforthepetitiQner. Shri AV.Shridhar, Pand Lawyer for the State/resgqndents. ORDJER(ORAL) (Passed on llul dayofJanuar^ 2011) 1. Leamed eounsel appearing fortiie petitioner subnats ttet vide order dated 22.092010 (Annexure P/l), the'petitionac, workmg as Lower Division Clerk posted at the office ofthe Deputy DirectflT, Agriculture, Bijapur las been transferred to the office ofDeputy Director, Agiculture, KabiTdham, on adniiflistrative p-oimds. However, the petitioner has not yet been relieved tojomfhe new place of posting. Ms. Pandey submits Ihat once Ifae order of Iransfer has been passed, it is fcrthe govemmentto aisure that it is complied with immediatBly. She relies on a deeision of the Supreme Court in Sreedam Chandra Ghosh v. State ofAssam & others. m support of her eontCTtic®that if the onlw is ^ complied with, a direction canbe issued for enforeement diere<A^ 2. Shri Shridhar, ieamed Panel Lawyer appearing fer the StateA-espondents, suhmits that if the transfa- <adw dated 22.09.2010 is still ia existence and has not been conytied wifli, appropriate steps would be taken to comply with the onier, 3. Ifthe aforesaidlransfer order is still in existence, tfie govCTiBHeat is imder an obligation to comply with the same at once. It is accordingly directed that the transfer order shall be complied with forthwith within a period oftwo weeks. 4. AcGordingly, this petition is disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ' (1996)103cc 567 %...!.