... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6771 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6771 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6771 OF 2005 1. Mrs. Moriyambi @ Bagaum Sultan Mujawar 2. Sultan Kasam Mujawar 3. Mrs. Ruksana Raju Shaikh ...Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Shri S.S. Tambare for the Applicants. Ms M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for the Respondent. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : OCTOBER 19, 2005. DATE : OCTOBER 19, 2005. DATE : OCTOBER 19, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocate appearing for the Applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The Applicant Nos.1 and 2 are the in-laws of the deceased. The Applicant No.3 is the sister-in-law of the deceased. Offence has been registered under sections 498-A, 304-B, 323, 504 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. The learned A.P.P. on instructions of the Investigating Officer stated that investigation has been completed and the chargesheet is not filed because report of the Chemical Analyser is awaited. 3. The allegation against the Applicants is that they harassed the deceased and a demand was made for dowry repeatedly by the husband of the deceased. ... 2 ... There are various allegations made against the Applicants regarding the demand. The specific allegation seems to be that the husband of the deceased was demanding amount of Rs.50,000/- for running a mutton shop and the demand could not be fulfilled. A case seems to have been made out by them prosecution that the deceased consumed poison and committed suicide. However, cause of death as shown in the Post Mortem Notes is that death was caused due to the injury. The Applicant No.1 is a woman whose age is stated to be fifty-two years, the Applicant No.2 is sixty-two years old man and the Applicant No.3 is the married daughter of the Applicant Nos.1 and 2. Investigation has been completed and as there are no criminal antecedents of the Applicants, a case is made out for enlarging them on bail. 4. Hence, I pass the following order: : O R D E R : i) The Applicants shall be enlarged on bail in connection with C.R.No.50 of 2005 registered with C.R.No.50 of 2005 registered with C.R.No.50 of 2005 registered with Jejuri Police Station, District Pune, Jejuri Police Station, District Pune, Jejuri Police Station, District Pune, subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- each Rs.10,000/- each Rs.10,000/- each with one or two sureties in the like amount. ... 3 ... ii) The Bail is granted subject to condition that the Applicants will attend the concerned Police Station once in every calendar month till the conclusion of the trial. iii) The Bail is granted subject to condition that the Applicants shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement or threat to any prosecution witnesses and shall not in any manner tamper with the prosecution evidence. iv) The Applicants shall co-operate with the learned Trial Judge for expeditious disposal of the trial. Any attempt by the Applicants to delay the trial may be a ground for cancellation of bail. v) Any observation made in this order shall not be construed as any finding or any expression of opinion on the merits of the case at the time of trial. vi) Application is disposed of in above terms. vii) The parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order. ... 4 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE