1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. App. No. 367 of 2008 Smt. Jasleen Modi & another. .……… Petitioners Versus Principal Judge, Family Court & another. .……… Respondents Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. The learned trial Judge vide the impugned order dated 5th June, 2008 has dismissed the interim maintenance application filed by the petitioners without entering into any controversial aspect of the matter and without expressing any opinion about the merits of the petitioners’ main application filed under Section 125 CrPC. Of course in the course of the order, some observations have been made. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, I tend to agree with the view of the learned trial Judge. However, I do wish to lay very great stress on the fact that the learned trial Judge has not formulated any opinion nor has he taken any view as regards the merits of the main application filed by the petitioners. While upholding the impugned order and dismissing this petition, I direct the learned trial Judge to ensure that the main application under Section 125 CrPC is considered and disposed of by him on its merits, totally uninfluenced by the impugned order, as expeditiously as possible and, in any event, within three months from the date of communication of this order. The petition stands dismissed. (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 12.06.2008 G