IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2009 / 3RD ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 21457 of 2005(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MARIAMMA JOHN, W/O.JOHN, VYSERIL VEEDU, ARAKKUNNAM P.O. EDAKKATUVAYAL VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.C.JAMES RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE POST MASTER GENERAL, OFFICE OF THE POST MASTER GENERAL, CENTRAL REGIONA, PALLIMUKKU, COCHIN 16. 2. THE SENIOR POST SUPERINTENDENT, ERNAKULAM POSTAL DIVISION, COCHIN. 3. MARY JOHN, NADUPUARAMBIL VEEDU, ARAKKUNNAM P.O. EDAKKATTUVAYAL VILLAGE. ADV. SRI.JOHN VARGHESE, ASSISTANT SG FOR R1 & 2 SRI.P.K.RAVISANKAR FOR R3 SRI.D.SOMASUNDARAM, ADDL.CGSC FOR R1 & 2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE R2 DT.30.10.2003. P2: .DO. R1 DT.14.5.2005. P3: TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER FROM THE OFFICE OF R1 DT.18.5.2005. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: R1(a): TRUE COPY OF THE ENQUIRY REPORT OF THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER DT.29.1.2004. R1(b): TRUE COPY OF STATEMENTOF PETITIONER DT.13.1.2004. R1(c): TRUE COPY OF STATEMENT OF R3 DT.13.1.2004. R3(a): TRUE COPY OF PLAINT IN O.S.456/2005 BEFORE THE SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM. TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... W.P.(C) No.21457 of 2005 .................................................................... Dated this the 24th day of June, 2009. JUDGMENT W.P.(C) is filed for direction to respondents 1 and 2 to conduct enquiry against alleged misappropriation by third respondent. However, it is seen from the counter affidavit that the postal authorities have conducted investigation and petitioner was satisfied that there was no misappropriation whatsoever by third respondent. She is stated to have even withdrawn the complaint against the third respondent. In the circumstances, W.P. is dismissed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms