-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.21 OF 2006 In PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.39 OF 2003 Bombay Environmental Action Group & Anr. : Petitioners V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. : Respondents And Table Land Vyapari Association, Panchagani : Applicant (Prop. Intervenors) ... Mr.Uday Warunjikar for the applicant. Mr.D.J.Khambata i/b. M/s.Federal & Rashmikant for the petitioners. Mr.A. Sayyed for respondent No.5. ... CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE & S.R.DONGAONKAR,JJ. DATE : MARCH 24, 2006. P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Warunjikar for the applicant. Mr.Khambata appears for the original petitioners and Mr.Sayyed appears for respondent No.5. -: 2 :- 2. This Civil Application s filed by a Traders’ Association whose members claim to be carrying on various trading activities at the Panchgani table land. The submission is that they are 170 in number. Their particulars are not given. Mr.Warunjikar states that their particulars will be provided. 3. As far as joining the applicant in the petition is concerned, Mr.Khambata has no objection. Accordingly, vis-a-vis prayer clause (a), we permit the applicant to be impleaded. The impleaded party will file its reply in the main Civil Application No.2244 of 2004 by giving all their particulars. Prayer clause (a) thus stands disposed of. 4. As far as prayer clause (b) is concerned, we are not inclined to entertain it. Mr.Warunjikar is not pressing prayer clause (b). In any case, we are not inclined to grant it. Prayer clause (b) is rejected. 5. Civil Application stands disposed of. H.L. GOKHALE, J. S.R.DONGAONKAR, J.