IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14063 of 2004 KIRAN KUMARI, wife of Amardip Kumar Paswan, resident of Village- Fatehpur, P.S.-Zero Mile, Sabaur, District-Bhagalpur. …………………… Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through its Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director, I.C.D., Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur. 4. The Child Development Project Officer, Sabaur, Bhagalpur. 5. The Deputy District Commissioner, Bhagalpur. 6. The Block Development Officer, Sabaur, Bhagalpur. 7. Asha Devi, wife of Damodar Paswan, Member of Ward No. 3, resident of Grampanchayat-Fatehpur, P.S.-Sabaur, District-Bhagalpur. 8. the Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat-Fatehpur, P.S.-Sabaur, District-Bhagalpur. …………………………….. Respondents ----------- 3 9/11/2009 No one appears for the petitioner. Earlier also this application was dismissed for default on 1.2.2006 which got restored by order dated 11.9.2006 in M.J.C. No. 483/2006. Prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows:- “That petitioner prays for issuance of appropriate writ/s, direction/s and order/s for quashing the appointment of respondent no.7 and further for direction to consider the appointment of petitioner in accordance with Rules and further to hold a detail enquiry by any independent agency in the illegal appointments of Gram Sewikas and Sahayikas in all Gram Panchayats at large scale under the Block- Sabaur in the District-Bhagalpur and to take follow-up actions against the wrong doers and erring persons and to appoint genuine and needy persons in accordance with Rule and Law.” There is no denial that as against the alleged illegality of respondent no.7 the petitioner had remedy by approaching the competent authority as fixed by the State Government in the circular and in fact the petitioner did so by filing representation as is apparent 2 from the statement made in paragraph 12 of the writ application read with Annexures 1,2 and 3 thereof. There is, however, no counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State which could enable this Court to decide this question nor the petitioner has filed any further affidavit as with regard to disposal of the aforementioned representation. That being so, this Court would direct the Collector/District Magistrate, Bhagalpur district to look into grievance of the petitioner and dispose of the pending representation of the petitioner as contained in Annexure-2. The petitioner, if so advised, may also file fresh representation along with a copy of this order, whereafter the Collector/District Magistrate of the Bhagalpur district will pass an appropriate order in accordance with law without being influenced by any thing said by this court in this order. Such exercise, however, must be completed within a period of six months from the date of receipt of fresh representation filed by the petitioner. With the aforementioned observation/direction this application is disposed of. Abhay Kumar (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)