1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 228 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1709 OF 2007 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Advocate Mr. Pankaj A. Bharaj, mentioned the matter for advocate on record and prays for adjournment. On query by this court, whether advocate on record has filed leave note, counsel replied that leave note is not filed. Hence, his prayer for adjournment is rejected. With the assistance of learned A.G.P. Mr. Dighe, for the respondent Collector, Osmanabad and Mr. M.P. Tripathi h/f Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, learned counsel for respondent No. 3, I have perused document at Exh. “C” (pages 51 to 53) of the compilation. The District Collector, Osmanabad has decided the proposal of the petitioner on 24.11.2008 i.e. within six months from the date of order passed by the learned Division Bench of this Court. It appears that thereafter, an application was filed on behalf of the petitioner before the Collector 2 again to rehear the petitioner. The Collector, taking sympathetic view in the matter heard the petitioner and decided the matter on 30.5.2009. In this view of the matter, this Contempt petition devoid of any merits and the same stands dismissed. Notice discharged. (S. S. SHINDE. J.) Date:06.10.2010. rlj/