IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2011 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 1267 of 2011(S) --------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.16761/2011 Dated 30/06/2011 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION --------------------------------------------------------------- RAJESHKUMAR T., AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. K. NARAYANANKUTTY, KOOTTALA HOUSE, THORAPALAYAM, PALAKKAD (UPPER DIVISION CLERK, DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, PALAKKAD). BY ADV. SRI.K.P.BALAGOPAL RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT NOS. 1 & 2 IN THE WRIT PETITION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALKESH KUMAR SHARMA, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. T.O. SOORAJ, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DIRECTOR, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT,VIKAS BHAVAN,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. S. JAMAL THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs COC. NO. 1267/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE 1:COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 30/06/2011 IN WPC. NO.16761/2011-U ON THE FILE OF THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA. ANNEXURE 2:COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 08/08/2011 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE 3:COPY OF THE SENIORITY LIST DATED 17/05/2011. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Cont. Case (C) No. 1267 of 2011 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 13th day of December, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner complains of non-compliance with the directions in Annexure I judgment. I that judgment, I directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment in accordance with the findings in the judgment quoted in my judgment. Pursuant to the same, Annexure II order has been passed, wherein, it has been started thus: “Promotion of Sri. Rajeshkumar .T, Upper Division Clerk, District Industries Centre, Palakkad to the post of Junior Co- operative Inspector will be considered as and when his turn for promotion arises in accordance with his seniority in the category of Upper Division Clerk. This order is issued in compliance with the direction contained in the judgment dated 30.06.2011 in W.P (C) No. 16761/11.” The petitioner submits that that decision is wrong and the petitioner is entitled for appointment. Insofar as I have directed only to consider the case of the petitioner and the same has been considered by Annexure II order, I am of opinion that the petitioner's remedy lies in challenging that order appropriately if, according to the petitioner, the decision is wrong. Therefore, without prejudice to that right, this contempt case is closed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/