IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2010 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1932 CRP.No. 28 of 2005() -------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16/11/2004 IN IA 2269 2004 IN OS.624/1993 of MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF: ------------------------------------------ ANTONY, S/O. PAILY, THOPPILAN, ELAMBAKAPPILLY KARA, VENGOOR WEST VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.K.SREESAKUMAR SRI.BINU JOHN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANT: ------------------------------------- 1. ESTHAPPAN, S/O. PAILY, THOPPILAN, ELAMBAKAPPILLY KARA, VENGOOR WEST VILLAGE. * 2. VAREETH, S/O. PAILY, THOPPILAN, ELAMBAKAPPILLY KARA, VENGOOR WEST VILLAGE. DELETED 3. DEVASSY, S/O. PAILY, THOPPILAN, ELAMBAKKAPPILLY KARA, VENGOOR WEST VILLAGE. * THE NAME OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT IS DELETED FROM THE PARTY ARRAY AT THE RISK OF THE PETITIONER AS PER ORDER DATED 27/02/2007 IN I.A NO.541/2007. THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER NO REPRESENTATION FOR THE PETITIONER. PETITION DISMISSED FOR NONPROSECUTION. Sd/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE 08/04/2010 //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE K.T.SANKARAN, J. -------------------------------------------- C.R.P. NO. 28 OF 2005 A -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th April, 2008 O R D E R Though an order was passed on 27.2.2007 to take necessary steps to cure the defects, the defects are not cured yet. Today, there is no representation for the petitioner. The Civil Revision Petition is, therefore, dismissed for default. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/