１ ss.3405.01 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3405 OF 2001 Rajesh Jagdish Bajaj, Age-39 yrs. Indian Adult, residing at 101, Ocean View, 289-B, Union Park, Pali Hill, Bandra (W), Mumbai 400 052. ...Plaintiff. Vs. Surender D. Hatkar, Indian Adult, Proprietor of S.D.Hatkar & Associates, carrying on business at ‘Solanki Villa’, 608/A, Sachapir Street, Pune ...Defendant. .... Mr.B.S.Chandnani, Advocate for the plaintiff. None for the defendant. ..... CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 4th December, 2009. JUDGMENT.- 1. The plaintiff has filed this suit for recovery of amount based upon dishonour of cheques. The criminal case u/s.138 of Negotiable Instrument Act had dismissed for default long back. Though served, none appeared for the defendant. It means the averments made in plaint and the reference to the cheques, the amount so claimed remained uncontraverted. The plaintiff has filed affidavit-in-support of the claim regarding to the documents as well as the contents is also remained ２ ss.3405.01 uncontraverted. The averments, with regard to the commercial business/transaction, also remained uncontraverted. 2. In the result, the plaintiff’s suit is decreed for the sum of Rs. 2,89,750/- alongwith further interest on Rs.1,90,000 at the rate of 9% p.a. from the date of the suit till realization and cost of the suit. No costs. The refund of court, fee, if any, in accordance with law. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)