IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.669 of 2011 SATYA NARAYAN MANDAL, SON OF SHRI DHODHAI MANDAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 10.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 992(C) of 2008 for the offence punishable under Sections 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, petitioner along with two co-accused persons raped the complainant on 17.10.2008 and subsequently, on 18.10.2008 complainant filed the above stated case against the petitioner and two other co-accused persons. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the wife of co-accused Dinesh Mandal had lodged Supaul P.S. Case No. 101 of 2007 against one Sashi Bhushan Yadav for the offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and in the aforesaid case above said Sashi Bhushan Yadav was put on trial and subsequently, he was convicted by the concerned court. He further submitted that petitioner deposed in the above stated case on behalf of the prosecution and that is the reason the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case at the instance of above stated Sashi Bhushan Yadav. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant, submitted that during course of enquiry witnesses have supported the story of the complaint case. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions of the parties above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with above stated Complaint Case No. 992(C) of 2008. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )