IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWELVETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 8069 of 2003 Between: 1 S.M. Shafi, S/o. Khadarvali, District Co-Operative Central Bank, Ananthapur. 2 R. Laxmi Narayana, S/o. R. Pedda Narayana, Mudigubba Branch of Ananthapur District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd., Mudigubba, Ananthapur District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Ananthapur District Co-operative Central Bank, Rep.by its General Manager, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District. 2 The Board of Directors of the Ananthapur District Co-operati Central Bank, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District. 3 The Commissioner for Co-operation & Registrar of Co-op.Societies, Govt. of A.P., Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of respondents in regularisation of services of the Petitioners in the post of `Attenders' with effect from the dates of their appointment in such category and the notice/order, dated 25.01.2002 of the 1st respondent refusing to regularise the services of the Petitioners and non-payment of the regular pay scale attached to the said post with all consequential benefits as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, unjustified, unsustainable and contrary to the established principles of the law and direct the Respondents to regularise the services of the Petitioners as Attender duly absorbing them in permanent vacancies and the scales attached to the posts with all arrears and financial benefits with effect from the date of their engagement on daily wage basis and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent : MR.O.MANOHER REDDY FOR R1 The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No : 8069 of 2003 ORDER: The learned counsel for the writ petitioners addressed a letter to the Registrar (Judicial) seeking posting direction for withdrawal of the writ petition. Accordingly, the same has been listed under the caption “for withdrawal”. Perused the letter dated 8.8.2008 addressed to the Registrar (Judicial). Permission is accorded. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. _____________________ Justice G. Chandraiah Date:12.08.2008 mrb