IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10268 of 2011 SANJAY KUMAR @ SANJAY KUMAR UPADHYAY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner is that by opening a forged account by impersonating one Bindeshwari Singh, the bank draft was made. Subsequently, the money was taken from the bank on the ground that draft was lost but actually on the basis of said draft from I.T. Mall, the Laptop and other articles of Rs. 1,24,000/- were purchased. It appears that shop owner of the I.T. Mall lodged the case against the petitioner being Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 142 of 2010 for non encashment of the alleged draft in which petitioner has been granted anticipatory bail on 04.03.2011 vide A.B.P No. 4103 of 2010 on the undertaking of making 2 payment of the aforesaid purchased amount to the alleged shop owner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the present case has been lodged by the bank. Admittedly, the draft has not been encashed. Hence, no loss has been caused to the bank and it is further submitted that apart from two cases the petitioner has no case against him Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 103 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Bhojpur, Arrah, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)