^ ?^r';^TqT^ZT, ^Tll^^lco, [®lcrjS^(^< '"^ 200 •s^? ('^3^?) ^P^^T ^R^ff ^ fe^ <f^^8< ^T^tfOT^I^l Sinale Bench; Hon'ble Mf. Justice bhirendra Mishra) W.P. Fsl tklo.5779/2008 (Petition U//\ 226 c|f Constitution of India) PETCTCONER Bhanu Ra Teacher Middle S< - Kanker Vs RESPONbENTS ^ Gavade Age about 46 years, Astt. ^/o Shri Tijau Ram Gavade Govt. |hool Sirsida Block - Charama, bistt. |C.G.) 1. State|Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secre-fary Education & Tribe bepartment D.K.S. phawan, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) 2. Astt. | Commissioner Trible welfare beparl 3. Block Kanker |ment Kanker Oistt.- Kanker (C.G.) ^ducation Officer Charama bistt. - 1 (C.G.) 4. TreasLJry, Account <& Pension Kanker bistt. - Kank^r (C.G.) Present: Mr.Somkant Verma, Advocate for t|ie petitioner. Mr. P. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for th4 State. 17.10.2008 Heard. By the present petition the ffetitioner is seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to pay incre^ments and seniority from the date of his initial appointment in the light o|f decision rendered by the M.P. State w.^\^ ?^r^7T. —FS/597—3/2008—40,000. T^ T^l'Ml<rt^, ^Ttl^^Ko, [®tc'ii'Li^< '"^ 200 ^n^T (^3^^) 3i?^r^ifeN? wr?^i^T^^S^ L 1 Administrative Tribunal in O.A. others Vs. State of M.P. and othe( in W.P. (s) No.668/06. Case of the petitioner is Deputy Teacher on the fixed pay| his probation period he was regul^ scale from the date of his initia| teachers moved the State Adminj pay-scale wherein learned Tribur^al the same. This Court also while No.6681/06 vide order dated authorities to consider the ca^e approached the respondent authoji he is also similarly situated, but, Learned counsel for the pe^ be allowed to make a representat| treatment to the petitioner and sanctioned to other similarly situc(1 State Administrative Tribunal anc| ^10.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 f-s) dated 24.8.1992 and also this Court ^ "RPT^ff "^ fe^t <M^K ^T^tRlH^TI^T t|iat he was appointed on 28.11.1981 as jscaleof Rs.150/-. After completion of ^rized but he was not given regular pay appointment. Other similarly situated jstrative Tribunal, Jabalpur for regular vide order dated 24.8.1992 allowed |considering the same issue in W.P. (s) 7.12.2006 directed the respondent i^e of the petitioners. The petitioner 'ities to accord the same treatment as respondents have not paid any heed. h'tioner submits that the petitioner may on to respondent No.l for giving similar same pay-scale, which has already been cjted teachers on account of the order of this Court. -— the ^r^-^j s:T-^k H^n^T, •n -FS/197—3/2008—40,000. •T^^TTqMZT^ ^Til^^Ko, I^<ni^^< •^ 200 -^I^? ^^ (^t^q^) ^i^^ifete' •wr^ii^^TOr ^ -3 Learned for the State has with a direction to the respondent^ Having heard learned couns^ facts and circumstances of the Court the limited prayer made appears to be reasonable and ther| a representation within a period o| No.l raising all her grievances anc| the said representation, in an obje): from the date of receipt of such points raised by the petitioner an^ by the Administrative Tribunal an^ Accordingly, the petition direction. Certified copy as per rules. ^i^i^1<4)^ 'WT^Tf ^ 1^^ '(f^T^R ^^H^n^T tio objection if the petition is disposed to consider the case of the petitioner. [\ for the parties, having regard to the \ase, in the considered opinion of this |>y learned counsel for the petitioner ^fore, the petitioner is allowed to make i|f two weeks' from today to respondent I, in turn, respondent No.l shall decide :tive manner, within a period of 30 days ^epresentation, after considering all he taking into account the orders passed this Court. is disposed of with the aforesaid Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ^iRN^ ^r^T H^II^T, •H' -FS/197—3/2008—40,000.