v tU <e> -s- ^ 1 ^ COu d 01 'Q ci 1 Oi f-f ^ w ^ VI u >^ mm +-> ^c ^o rr~i ^' "o ^ 'a b0 1 -a cd 's .& •-!3 o ^.j t bfl Ki 1u 4-< s E~i <u ^ •T3 (L>-5. +~* v> s" 5 ^ _u u \J)-^ ^^(^ r~r\\'it^ \ /w\ fsss^ \- .%. \ s. %.. <a.- ^ 't 's yfr* o- J- C3 1 &< (U 3t y. 5 I i ~S "3II iu s '§ ^ S Q T-(u Cflw T < i w Ki VI F3 ^-4 -a .^'l w or-f Q § ^ '^s o sj Q^ X> F—l ^ Ql 01 •^ m UWJSS^^.^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : fflLASPUR WRTT PETiTiON (S) N0. 5140 OF 2009 PETJTiONER Smt. Tankeshwari Sahu ^; RESPONDENTS Versus State ofChhattisgarh & Others Go'A'ri (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Presenf:- Shri S.P. Kaie, counsel for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhadu", Panel Lawyer for the Stete. (Passed on this 10tn day ofSeptember, 2009) 1. Heard leamed counse! for the parties. ~ 2. Leamed counse! appearing for the petitioner submits that the "'instant petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered s" Smt. A. La!l v. State of Chhattjsgarh & Others , thus the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to decide her case in the Ifght of afore-stated decision, subjeirt to verification asto whether the respondent No.3 Institute is a Government aided school and the petitioner is a teacher within the sanctioned strength. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petittoner makes a representation, the same wi!! be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receiDt of the representetion. 4. In view of foregoing, according to the iearned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothina survives in this petition for adiudication. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 WP No.4108 of 2005 (ctecided on 6-2-2007}