IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH AUGUST 2008 / 22ND SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 22520 of 2008(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ UMADEVI, W/O. VIJAYAN, AGED 30, VIJAYA BHAVAN, POOCHEDIVILA, PERUMKUZHAM VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAMASWAMY PILLAI SRI.P.M.JOSEPH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY, STATE SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTAKADA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTAKADA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST. 5. SHAHUL HAMEED @ SHAJI, S/O. SALI SAHIB, AGED 45, RESIDING AT MOHAMAD MANZIL, NADAKKODE, PERUMKUZHAM. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE JACOB (JOSE) FOR R5 SR.GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC 22520/08 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS. EXT.P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S.430/08 FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 25.6.08. EXT.P2 - TRUE COPY OF COMMISSION APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE MUNSIFF'S COURT DT. 24.6.08. EXT.P3 - TRUE COPY OF REPORT OF THE ADV.COMMISSIONER DT. 18.7.08. EXT.P4 - TRUE COPY OF INJUNCTION ORDER DATED 26.6.08 PASSED BY THE LEARNED MUNSIFF. EXT.P5 - TRUE COPY OF THE COMMISSION APPLICATION DATED 10.7.08 FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO PREPARE REPORT OF DAMAGES. EXT.P6 - TRUE COPY OF FIR NO.256/08 DT. 10.7.08. EXT.P7 - TRUE COPY OF PHOTOGRAPH OF THE DAMAGES DONE BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P8 - TRUE COPY OF PAPER REPORT APPEARED IN MALAYALA MANORAMA DT. 16.7.08. /TRUE COPY/ K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 22520 OF 2008-E ----------------------------------------- Dated 13th August, 2008. JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair, J. This Court, while admitting the Writ Petition, has passed an interim order on 25.7.2008, so as to enable the petitioner and her family members to get police protection. The party respondents have appeared and filed a counter affidavit. The petitioner has filed a reply affidavit. 2. After hearing both sides, we feel that the writ petition can be disposed of maintaining that interim order. It is ordered accordingly. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE. Nm/