IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27460 of 2010 SUBHASH MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 6.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 290 litres of illicit wine is recovered from the petitioner’s Bhatti. Prayer for anticipatory bail is sought on the ground of remaining two persons as witnesses of 19 raids conducted by the Police and not adoption of proper proceeding in preparation of seizure list, is not the stage to doubt. On merit also that is not prohibited only same persons are witnesses in raid conducted in same sequences, may never be doubted. Petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)