IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1622 of 2010 DEEPAK MANDAL @ DEEPAK KUMAR @ DIPAK RAJ Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 24.01.2011 Heard both sides. Present application has been filed questioning the sustainability of order dated 29th September, 2010 passed on his appeal being Cr.Appeal no. 105 of 2010, whereby prayer for bail was refused. Petitioner is enmeshed in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Arms Act. It is allegation that he was found in possession of one country made pistol and 02 cartridges. A report from the Probation Officer was called for which is at Flag-A. On the basis of fact found and disclosed, the Probation Officer has recommended his release allowing liberty to live subject to control of his parents. Petitioner is in custody/remand home since 10.03.2010. Present application has been filed supported by an affidavit affirmed by the father. Paragraph no. 14 states as under:- 14. “That the petitioner’s father undertakes that he will look after his son (petitioner) and his son will not commit any crime in future.” Having regard to these facts appearing from records, this Court is satisfied that the petitioner be released on bail. Consequently this Court sets aside the order dated 07.09.2010 passed by learned Juvenile Justice Board, Munger in G.R.No. 417 of 2010, arising out of Kharagpur P.S. case no. 67 of 2010 2 and affirmed in appeal by the learned Sessions Judge, Munger. Petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board, Munger in connection with G.R. case no. 417 of 2010, arising out of Kharagpur P.S case no. 67 of 2010, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be the father of the petitioner. (ii) It shall be the duty of the father to keep an eye on the petitioner and to produce him in the Court as and when required. (iii) During subsistency of the privilege of bail, if it is found that petitioner has indulged himself in any criminal case the same shall be treated as breach of the condition of bail entailing cancellation. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)