B- c^-^ <( INTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGA_RHATBILASPUR TRANSFER PETITION (Civil) No. ^- /201Q, ^-^osSa ^, PETITIONER ....^; v-f-'''' w..^ •'"' ^l^' ' _,...w ~~r ^t^^<(^} '••;''' - ..^-^'' .'^•' ^f- IS' Smt. Mamta Singh, D/o. Shri Lal Prasad Singh, (Wife of Shri Manoj Singh Thakur) aged about 25 years, R/o. Shanti Nagar Ward, Sukma, Tahsil Sukma, Distt. Dantewada (C. G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT ^ Manoj Singh Thakur, S/o. Shri Ramayan Singh, aged about 33 years, R/o. Naya Sarkanda, Arvind Nagar, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C. G.) ^" TRANSFER PETITION UNDER SECTION 24 QF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FACTS OF THE CASE : 11 HIGH COURT OF C»HATTISCrARHAT BIIASPUR TRANSFER PETITION ICTWTU N0. 7 OF 2010 PETITIONBR Smt. Mamta Singh Versus RESPOiroENT : Manoj Singh Thakur Transfer Petition under Section 24 offhe Code of Civil Procedlire (Sinrile Beach: Hon1>Ie Shri N.K. Atan»aI._J,l Present : Shri Shrawan Agrawal, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Bharat Regput, counsel for the respondenfc ORALORDER (Passed on 13"' dayofApril, 2011} Learaed counsel for fhe parties submit fhat fhe case has been decided by Daatewara Court. Therefore, fhis petition hss become mfructuous. 2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge Kwr