IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10908 of 2009 KUMARI BIMLA WIFE OF SRI VINAY SHARMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- & POST KANCHANPUR, P.S.- BIHTA, DISTRICT- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, SICHAI BHAWAN, PATNA 3. THE JOINT SECRETARY (MANAGEMENT) WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, SICHAI BHAWAN, PATNA 4. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, SICHAI BHAWAN, PATNA 5. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL ( A & E) BIHAR, B.C. PATEL PATH, PATNA 6. THE DIRECTOR, GENERAL PROVIDENT FUND DIRECTORATE, PANT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA ----------- 7 22.02.2010 A rejoinder has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon the superannuation of her husband on 31st January, 2008 from the post of Executive Engineer, Water Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, the petitioner has not been paid the full amount of the provident fund dues. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that for facilitating the calculation and payment of the provident fund dues the petitioner has given a detailed statement indicating the place of posting of the husband of the petitioner at different offices as contained in Annexure-1 (series). Learned counsel appearing fro the State submits that the chart furnished by the petitioner shall be verified and the claim for payment of the unpaid amount of provident fund dues shall be settled and paid to the petitioner at the earliest. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.6 for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims with regard to the provident fund dues is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner with regard to payment of provident fund dues could be settled without delay and admitted dues could also be paid along with statutory interest. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)