IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12709 of 2008 KAPILDEO MUKHIYA @ KAPIL MUKHIYA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 07.05.2008 Heard both sides. The petitioner has approached this Court for grant of bail in a case instituted under sections 171,420,406,120B of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not even named in the First Information Report. The First Information Report was lodged against one Keshav Kumar Jha ( Mukhiya) and one Ganga Rai who is said to be an agent of the said Mukhiya. Learned counsel for the petitioner referring to para 2 of the impugned order submits that at distant point of time statements of some witnesses have been recorded indicating that this petitioner was also responsible for extracting some money in the name of ex- mukhiya namely, Keshav Kumar Jha @ Sushil Jha. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the amount allegedly extracted by this petitioner has not been disclosed. It has further been submitted that the named accused in the present case namely, Keshava Kumar Jha @ Sushil Jha and Ganga Rai have been granted bail by this Court under order dated 07.02.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No.1098 of 2008(Annexure-2). In the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner namely, Kapildeo Mukhiya @ Kapil Mukhiya be released on bail 2 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Bhimpur P.S.Case No.26 of 2006. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)