IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 594 of 2006 Between: R.Sarangapani, S/o.Ramachander, Nizam College, Osmania University, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Osmania University, Rep by its Registrar, Osmania University,Campus, Hyderabad. 2 The Principal, Nizam College (Autonomous), Osmania University , Hyderabad. 3 The Principal, University College of Science, Osmania University, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 1st respondent herein in not issuing the Hall Ticket to the Petitioner for the Written Examination to be held on 08-01-2006 for the post of Assistant Professor in Physics pursuant to Advertisement No.1/2003 on the grounds of over-age, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and consequently direct the 1st respondent to issue Hall Ticket to the petitioner, while permitting him to sit for the Written Examination to be held on 08-01-2006 forthwith and consider his case for the said post; and pass such other or further orders as are necessary. Counsel for the Petitioner:MRC.RAJA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE The Court made the following : ORDER This writ petition has been filed by R.Sarangapani assailing the action of the respondents in not issuing hall ticket to the petitioner for the written examination to be held on 8.1.2006 for the post of Assistant Professor in Physics on the ground of over age. On 22.2.2008, initially interim relief came to be refused on the ground that the entire process of selection has been stayed in WPMP No.644 of 2006 in WP No.19239 of 2003. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. _________ 16-07-2008 rkk