Crl. Revision No. 2726 of 2010(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No. 2726 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: January 04, 2011 Ram Dev ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. CRM No. 52119 of 2010 For the reasons recorded in the application, the delay of 44 days in filing the present revision petition is condoned. CM stands disposed of. Crl. Revision No. 2726 of 2010 This petition is directed against the order of the Revisional Court whereby the charge framed against respondent No.2 has been quashed. The learned Revisional Court has come to the conclusion that the petitioner has not been able to bring home the allegation that respondent No.2 had any connection with him or that respondent No.2 had at any stage any contact with the petitioner at all and has thus allowed the revision. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that respondent Crl. Revision No. 2726 of 2010(O&M) 2 No.2 had sold the property in dispute to his vendor and actually that was a path. Learned Revisional Court has also noticed that the sale transaction by respondent No.2 in favour of the vendor of the petitioner was effected as far back as 1997. To this finding learned counsel for the petitioner has countered by arguing that it was only when the petitioner started construction and the neighbours objected that he came to know that in fact a portion of the property purchased by him was a path. In my opinion it cannot be said that the Revisional Court has exercised its jurisdiction in an arbitrary or perverse manner. There is a bald allegation of conspiracy without any material as far as the respondent No.2 is concerned. If at all any body has defrauded the petitioner it could only be his vendor. Consequently the petition is dismissed. Since the main case has been decided, all the pending Crl.Misc. Applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE January 04, 2011 sunita