HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition gS\ N0, 5826 0f 2007 Pramod Kumar Bhani S/o Aged about 36 years, Occupation Service, Posted as Patwéri Halka No. 31 Bade Satti, Tahsil Sukama, Distt. Dantewada (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1‘ The State of Chhaitisgarh, through the Secretmy Revenue Department, DKS building, Raipur (CG). The Collector, Dantewada, Distt. Dantewada (CG). Sub Divisionai Odicer (Revenue) Konta, head quarter Sukamaj Disit. Dantewada (CG). 4. Tahsiidar Sukama, Distt. Daniewada (CG). M U) (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. AE'hotri, J.) Dr. Sanjeet Shanna. Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 14E; ofJanuary, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was posted as Patwari in Patwahi Hallm No. 31 Bade Satti, RNB Sukama Tahsil-Konta, Digit. Dantewada. The petitioner has been transferred to Bade Satti, Patwari Hake No. 31, Tahsil Kondagaon, Distt. Bastar, vide order dated 29.06.2007. This transfer has been made on request of the petitioner. Despite the transfer order dated 29.06.2007, the petitioner has not been relieved from the old place ofposting to join his new place ofposting. SlLri Arvind Dubey, Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that as per policy, this area is specified as scheduled area and person cannot he relieved Without their being substitute for the same. This is a case where the petitioner has been transferred from one scheduled area to other scheduled area, thus, this clause may not be applicable in the instant petition. ~ PETITIONER Present : l vxw / \ 4. The representation of the petitioner for transferring on his own expense has become fruitless as the State-authorities have considered his representation and passed the transfer order, but the said transfer order has not been given effect to. Since the transfer order has been passed at the request of the petitioner, I do not find any reason not to relieve the petitioner from his old place of postrng. The respondents are aceordingly directed to make suitable arrangement within a period of four weeks for relieving and allowing the petitioner to join his new place ofposting“ 7. In View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of with abovestated directions. No order asto costs. / {V if Sdl- ' . i‘ Satish K- Agmhou‘ Judge Sahu