IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.368 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.368 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.368 OF 2007 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.886 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.886 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.886 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4492 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4492 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4492 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF M/s. Martek Engineering Works ..Applicant. Vs. M/s. VNS Offshore Services Company & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.S.R.Singh for Mr.D.R.Mahadik, advs. for the Applicant. Mr.A.M.Vernekar, adv. for the Respondent Nos.1,3 and 4. Mrs.V.R.Bhosale, APP for the State. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : JUNE 25, 2007. DATE : JUNE 25, 2007. DATE : JUNE 25, 2007. P.C. 1. This is an application to make amendment in criminal application no.886 of 2006, which is for condonation of delay and in criminal application no.4492 of 2006 which is an application seeking leave to prefer appeal against the acquittal. According to the applicant, respondent no.2, who is original accused no.2 had died and his name has been deleted in the complaint before the trial Court. However, his name is wrongly shown in all these matters before the Court. Therefore, the applicant seeks to delete the name of respondent - no.2. The applicant also contends tht the respondent no.1 firm has been taken over by M/s. Damodar Marine Services Private Limited and, therefore, it is necessary to implead it in lieu the respondent no.1. In my opinion, it would be better to allow amendment to add the said company as the respondent no.1(a). 2. Therefore, amendment is allowed. Respondent no.2 be deleted and Damodar Marine Services Private Limited be impleaded as the respondent no.1(a).Amendment be effected within one week. [J.H.BHATIA, J.] [J.H.BHATIA, J.] [J.H.BHATIA, J.]