1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.175 OF 2002 IN WRIT PETITION NO.297 OF 1999 Nancy John Almeida ..Petitioner V/s. The President, ..Respondents Shri.Vile Parle Kelavani Mandal & ors Mr.G.V.Pandya,Advocate, for petitioner Mr.Rahul Nerlekar, Advocate, for respondent No.2 Mr.P.M.Palshikar, AGP, for respondent No.3 CORAM : J.N.PATEL & K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE : 8TH JULY, 2008 P.C. . Heard. 2. The petitioner seeks an amendment to the petition as per Schedule annexed to the affidavit in support of the Chamber Summons. We have gone through the annexure. We found that the proposed amendment does not in any manner prejudice the respondent who will have ample opportunity to meet 2 the same by carrying out consequential amendment by filing affidavit-in-reply. We, therefore, allow the Chamber Summons. The Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Necessary amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks. Amended copy of the petition be placed on record and also be furnished to the learned counsel for the respondents. The respondents are at liberty to file their affidavit in reply to meet the case of the petitioner as it stands after amendment. (J.N.PATEL, J.) (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)