iW»SW»U»»Si^^^»S^9®«i«^ ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH.BILASPUR -y Writ Petition (Art. 227lNo.4512 of 2010 PETITIONER/: (Plaintiff) Gopal Das @ Gopal Prasad Agrawal, S/o Shri Gulabchand, age about 48 years, Occupation Business, R/o Station Road, Kharsiya District, Raigarh (C.G.) RESPONDENTS/: (Defendants) Versus 1. Mahgat Rai @ Mangatram Agrawal S/o Ganpath Rai @ Ganpatram Agrawal, aged about 65 years, Occupation Business and Farmer, R/o Sajan Cloth Store, Station Road, Kharsiya District, Raigarh(C.G.) 2. State of Chhattisgarh ThroughCollector Raigarh(C.G.) {Writ petition underArticle 227ofthe Constitution of India} Present: Mr. Amit Sharma, counsel forthe petitioner. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jha, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the State/ respondent No.2. None presentforrespondent No,1. Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma. J ORALORDER (20-8-2010) 1. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the order impugned dated 12-5-2010 passed by the District Judge, Raigarh in Misc. Civil AppealNo. 18/2009 and the order dated 29-9-2009 passed by the Civil Judge Class-11, Kharsiya in Civil Suit No.138A/2009. 2. By the order dated29-9-20Q9, learned Civil Judge CIass-II has allowed the application filed under Qrder 39 Rules 1 & 2 of the C.P.C. and granted injunction against respondent No.1 hereinand restrained notto alienate the land to third party during the pendency ofthe suit and same was reversed by the order impugned. From perusal of the order impugned and the order dated 29-9-2009 passed by the Civil Judge Class-ll, Kharsiya in CivilSuit N0.138A/2009, l do notfind any illegality in theorder impugned. ^rv f'iljfca. y:&^ '^'^^?,.^.^ 'v^'^^ Soma 3. Consequently, the petition is liable to be dismissed and it is hereby dismissed. No orderastocosts. • <-7^ ' 4. I.A.Np.1 stands disposed of. Sd/- TR Sharma Judge -dr