N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILAS CHHATTISGARH ‘ WRIT PETITION No. 2:2 l2. OF 2004 Vishweshwarlal Nayak aged about 43 \vyears, S/o Ruplal Nayakj presently posted and workmg aS' Assustant Teacher, Government Girls‘ Hrgh School Baramkela, Block Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh‘ (Chhattisgarh ‘ ETITIONE PR Versus . State of Chhattisgarh through the "Secretary, Department of School Education, D. K. S. Bhawan, Mfantralaya,Rai‘pur (Chhattisgarh) Director, Public Instructions} Directorate,Raipur (Chhattisgarh)‘ Collector, Raiigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) ' District Education Officer; Ralgarh, District Raigarhi‘ (Chhattisgarh) ' ~ ‘ _- __ ESNDNS : RIT PETITION UNDER ARTI 226 227 OF TH ‘ rnN<TITUTION O INDIA ‘ I PUR ) RPOET :.I x . W CLE E F mac—22 311w “LP-$10. mm mm WW?! Counsel for the petitioner/s subm itted that the transfer of the petitioner/s has been V'effected illegally in contravention of law md policy. State counsel opposed it. State counsel submitted that the petitioner/s has straightway filed the petition without serving notice for demand of just e and representation, Having heard and considered e rival contentions, Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. in the opinion of this Court, ends of justice will be served if a direction is given to the peti ‘oneri’s to malce detailed representation raising hiS/her grievances and grounds before th State Govemment/‘competent authority of the respondents aha; “itii a wpy oi the pended ' 26-8—2004 On a mention being made, this case is taken up. Petitioner/s by Shri H‘S- fail”, HJVOW . State by Shri V.V.S. Murthy; Hy AdvocaE§ General, with Shh Satish Gupta, Dy.GA, and 'Shri Akhil Agrawal and Shxi Sandeep Dubey, Panel Lawyers. r Heard " ’ The matter Ielateé to transfer of t} ,e petitioner from the respective place. “itimi ii) days, and on such representation being filed: the State Gove ailment/competent authority of the respondents, under the law: shall consider and decide the sarnel'on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible preferably within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of the representation. If any contravention of policy or guidelines is brought to the notice: the same be considered on its own merits e Counsel for the petitioneri’s prays that after the decision of the representation if any grievance of the petitioner's remains: lie/she may be allowed to avail the remedy available under the law. lt is open to the petitioner to avail the remedy available under the law a; 9 With the aforesaid observations, this petition stands disposed of. Consequently if also stands disposed of. i\'I.W.E:t, any, , ‘ (.ertitied copy as per rules sdl_ > ‘i Copy to State counsel for compliance. i Fakhruddin H/ \ %fe Xi; 5}!) H l p l ~ i Judge