Ca?ta€J/f IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petrhon (S) No.1N3 /200‘Q\ Pefifioner Rupendra Singh Dhr'uv S/o Thanu Ram Dhruv, aged abouT 23 years, R/o Nayapam Kaia,_ Pifhour'd, Disfr'icf Mahasamund (C.G.) Versus /1. S’rafe of Chhatfisgar‘h Through The Collector—Mahasamund, Tahsil and District—Mahasamund (6.6.) Chief Executive Officer, Dis’rric‘r Panchayai', Mahasamund, Tahsil and 'Dis‘rric’r Mahasamund (C.6.) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayaf, Pifhoura, Tahsil ang Disfricf Mahasamund (6.6.) Gram Panchayaf, Nayapara Kala fhrough its Sarpahch, Gram Panchaya’r, 'Nayapara Kala, Block Pi’rhoura, Dis’rricf Mahasamund (6.6.) Narendra Kumar Vaishnav s/o Gajendr'a Kumar Vaishnav, aged abou’r 25 years, R/o Nayapara Kala, Block Pifhoura, Disfric’r Mahasamund (6.5.) Resgonderrts WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA § straw m é mmW;E£§)m.z..1m$. W WK} 2 W m Em fam‘mm mm?! 31m mm afga W aaW am m W WIT s3: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. PRHTINKER DIWAKER z: 16-12-2010: Shri Sunil Sahu, counsel fou' the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. vocate‘for respondents No. 1 and‘2. Shri Rahul Tamaskar, coun el for respondent No. 3. Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, ounsel for respondent No. 4., Shri Sanjay Patel, counsel f r respondent No. 5. Counsel for the petitioner s mite that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition. Permission granted. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. z Sd/- xi Pritinker Diwaker W git Judge (/V‘ t l [His Km