IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 2471 of 2009 Between: 1 Jala Venkatamma W/o.Late Raji Reddy R/o.Gannervaram V/o.Bejjanki Mandal, Karimnagar District 2 Edla Nagavva W/o.Narsimha Reddy R/o.Ramakrishna colony Thimmapoore Mandal, Karimnagar District ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition Unit, S.R.S.P.LMD, Colony, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District 2 Gudi Venkatnarsu @ Venkat Narsimha Reddy S/o.Malla Reddy R/o.Hanmajipally village Bejjanki Mandal, Karimnagar District 3 Gudi Raji Reddy S/o.Malla Reddy R/o.Hanmajipally village Bejjanki Mandal, Karimnagar District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the inaction of the 1st respondent in referring the dispute with regard to the entitle to receive the compensation for the acquired House property Bearing House No.3- 15-Project No.255( Sl.No.175) situated at Hanmajipally village, Bejjanki Mandal, Karimnagar District to the competent civil court pursuant to the petitioners claim representation as well as legal notice as illegal, arbitrary, and violation of Articles, 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st respondent to refer the claim of the petitioners for payment of compensation to the Competent Civil court for proper adjudication Under section 30 and 18 of Land Acquisition Act. Counsel for the Petitioners :MR.A.RAVINDER Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU Writ Petition No.2471 of 2009 Order: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ____________ C.V. Ramulu, J Date:24.04.2009 VGB