IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 5TH JUNE 2008 / 15TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 19340 of 2006(B) -------------------------- ID.3/2005 of LABOUR COURT, KOZHIKODE .................... PETITIONER: ------------ FATHIMA, W/O HASSAN KOYA, PALANGAD VEEDU, P.O. NARIKKUNI. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. K.P. CHANDRAN, KEEZHPARAMBIL, MUTTANCHERRY, P.O. MADAVOOR, KOZHIKODE. 2. LABOUR COURT, KOZHIKODE. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. I.V. PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 19340 of 2006 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 5th June, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner challenges Ext. P1 award passed by the Labour Court, Kozhikode in I.D.No. 3/2005 in which the petitioner was the management. Both the workman and the petitioner gave evidence. The Labour Court, after considering the oral evidence of the petitioner and the 1st respondent, came to the conclusion that the 1st respondent's evidence is more probable and believed the evidence of the workman. This Court can interfere with awards of the Industrial Tribunals and Labour Courts in respect of findings of fact therein only if such findings are demonstrably perverse. On a reading of Ext. P1 award, I do not find anything perverse in the assessment of evidence. Therefore, I am not inclined to interfere with the award and accordingly the writ petition is dismissed. S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/