/-^o IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR I. I. W.P.fS) N0, / 2008 PETIT10NER <?.»• xs" .^^1^- ^Kv~^>"""..^ >^-"'" 'f~~ e\.,-'''"' RESPQNDENTS VERSUS .^. ^ SJ' .?,.-•"• ^'<-M -. ^^ '""•• .-^^ •f^:^ ^~>' ^y' <^% Vikas Goswami, S/o Shri Viflod Goswami, Aged about 28 years, R/o Goswami Medical Store, Post- Dongargaon, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, General Administration Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Secretary of Home Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Through : The Secretary, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Roktima Rai, D/0 Shri D.P. Rai, Aged about 32 Years, R/0 D.P. Rai Bhawan, Naya Sarkanda, Bangalipara, Bilaspur (C.G.) Gopi Chand Meshram, aged about 26 years, Deputy Superintendent of Police , R/0 C/0 C.G. Police Academy, Chandrakhuri, Mandir Hasod, District Raipur (CG) Lakhan Lal Patle, aged about 33 years, Deputy Superintendent of Police , R/0 C/0 C.G. Police Academy, Chandrakhuri, Mandir Haso.d, District R.aipur (CG) ^ts&t.i 'clfs^: WRIT PETITIONUNDER ARTICI.E 226 OF THE CONSnTUTION OF^MDIA II HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON CS) No. 4384 of2008 PETmONER RESPONDENTS Vikas Goswami. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & 5 Othere. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTLTION OF CsTDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. J. Pressnt: Shri Prateek Sharma, Advocats for the petitioner. Slrn Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State/ respondent No. 1 aud 2. Shri B.D.Gum, Advoeate fortheCGPSC/respondentNo. 3. None for the other respondents. ORDER fORAL^ (Passed on 20"' day of November, 2009) 1. By fliis petition the petitioner seeks to quash the select/merit list dated 17 May, 2007, issued by the Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission on tfie eround that it is violative ofthe Chhattisgarh Police Executive (Gazstted) Services Recroitment and Promotion Ruies, 2005 (for short 'fhe Rules, 2005') and further a direction to the respondent authorities to issue a fresh selecfmerit list in accordance with the Rules, 2005 for the post of Deputy Supemitendent ofPolice with all consequential benefits. 2. Leamed counsel appearine for the parties jointly submit that the issue involved herein this petition is squarely covered by the jud^nent of this Court, prQnouncedtodayi.e. 16 November, 2009, 'mRichaMishra v. State ofChhattisgarh & others and other connected matters. 3. In view ofthe foregoing, this petition stands disposed of in terms offhe mRichaMishra (supra). No order asto costs. -- -- - ---~- -.^—-„„-.-.-.-..-.-.,--..-^.-.--..-.^.-.-^^ ^^ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge