CWP No. 3637 of 2011 6.7.2011 Present: Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner, Mr. R.M Bisht, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents No.1 and 2. It is seen that petitioner has been transferred twice in less than two months. It is also the petitioner’s grievance that the impugned transfer is only to accommodate the private respondent who appears to be close to the authorities. It is also seen that petitioner’s husband is serving in defence forces near Indo-Nepal Border and she has got none to look after her younger children who are undertaking their studies at Shamshi. It is the petitioner’s grievance that due to the impugned order of transfer, she has been subjected to great hardship. She claims that certain posts are lying vacant in and around her place of residence and/or original place of posting. All these factual aspects can be sympathetically considered by the respondents. 2. Accordingly, respondent No.2 is directed to consider the same and take a decision within a period of 10 days from today, Till then interim order dated 20-6-2011 passed by this Court shall continue. Petition stands disposed of. A duly authenticated copy of this order be supplied to the petitioner. July 6, 2011. (Sanjay Karol),Judge. (priti)