1 ca 8887.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8887 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2010 Ram Naresh Sharma .. Applicant Versus Trinity Forge Limited .. Respondent Shri P. V. Barde, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri V. N. Upadhye, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 02ND SEPTEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : . The present applicant is the original petitioner in the Writ Petition No. 2564/2010. The said writ petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Industrial Court modifying the order passed by the Labour Court i. e. reinstating the petitioner with backwages. The Industrial Court only awarded compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- instead of reinstatement with backwages. 2. Shri Barde, the learned counsel for the applicant/original 2 ca 8887.11 petitioner states that the petitioner would press the writ petition to the extent of quantum of compensation awarded and other prayers about reinstatement with backwages would not be pressed. The learned counsel submits that he had also filed proceedings before the Labour Court for payment of amount of compensation awarded by the Industrial Court. But only on the ground that present writ petition is pending, the Industrial Court has refrained from passing any orders thereon. 3. Shri Upadhye, the learned counsel for the respondent submits that as the writ petition was filed challenging the order of Industrial Court and the petitioner was claiming relief of reinstatement with backwages. The Industrial Court was justified in not granting any relief to the applicant regarding the payment of compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/-. The order of the Industrial Court granting compensation is not challenged by the respondent as on today. 4. The present respondent has not challenged the order of the Industrial Court granting compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/-. Even Shri Barde, the learned counsel for the petitioner has made statement at bar that the writ petition would be limited to the 3 ca 8887.11 extent of quantum of compensation and not in respect of reinstatement with backwages. In the light of above under any circumstances the applicant would be entitled for an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/-. In the light of that the present respondent is directed to deposit an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- in this Court within a period of six weeks from today. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Sept. 11