IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5853 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 13, 2010 Chander Prabha …Petitioner Versus Sudesh Kumari and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Manish Soni, Advocate, for Mr. S.S. Dinarpur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 24.05.2010 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, thereby issuing notice on the ad-interim application and not granting ex-parte injunction as well as order dated 07.08.2010 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, C.R. No.5853 of 2010 thereby refusing to grand at-interim injunction and directed hearing the appeal on merit. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that the learned Trial Court be directed to decide the ad-interim application at the earliest so that nature of the property may not be changed. He seeks permission to withdraw the appeal as well as the present petition. Present petition, as well as appeal pending before the learned Additional District Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, are dismissed as withdrawn. However, learned Trial Court is directed to decide the ad-interim application moved by the petitioner at its own merit within a period of thirty days from the date of production of the certified copy of this order. September 13, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2