IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21429 of 2010 1. SATYAM KUMAR @ SATYAM KUMAR SINGH SON OF YASWANT SINGH 2. YASWANT SINGH @ JAWANT SINGH SON OF LATE INDRASHAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30.6.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 364 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the son of the complainant/informant was employed by the petitioners but some time later the petitioners came and told him that his son had run away. On suspicion the present complaint was filed about one month later. Subsequently during trial the informant deposed that in fact the alleged kidnapped boy was of a weak mind and run away and, therefore, the witness was declared hostile. Considering the same, let the petitioners above named, who are in custody since 17.1.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 9th Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran, Motihari in S.Tr.No.436 of 2009 arising out of Motihari Town P.S.case No.89 of 2007, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish - 2 - information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and (iii) that the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )