IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16874 of 2011 RAJA KUMAR GUPTA @ JITENDRA , Son of Saral Prasad Gupta, resident of Village-Pani Tanki, Dhantolia, P.S.-Dehri, District-Rohtas at Sasaram. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 01.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The truck of the informant was stolen. Amar Nath promised to search the truck. The informant paid one and a half lakhs to Amar Nath. Recovery was also made from the house of Amar Nath. The role assigned to the petitioner is that his mobile was used in the occurrence, on the basis of which he is also said to be involved in the said occurrence. The petitioner is in custody since 28.03.2011 Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner namely, Raja Kumar Gupta @ Jitendra be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Dehri (Town) P.S. Case No. 157 of 2011 subject to the following conditions. (a) Both the bailors should be family members of the petitioner; 2 (b) The attested photographs of the bailors should be affixed on the bail bonds; (c) The bailors will given an undertaking in writing that they will be responsible for producing the petitioner during the proceedings of the case; (d) The petitioner shall remain physically present before the Court below on each and every date fixed in the case and on his absence even for a single date without an explanation to the satisfaction of the Court below, the Court below will be at liberty to take action not only against the petitioner but also against the bailors. Anand Kr. ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)