IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2011 / 29TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 19358 of 2011(T) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SHAREEF K.K., S/O.SOOPI, AGED 35 YEARS, KACHERIKAANDI HOUSE, KOOTHALI P.O., KALLOOR DESOM, KOILANDI TALUK, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOZHIKODE, PIN CODE – 673 011. 2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, KOILANDI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN CODE – 673 508. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERAMBRA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT – 673 525. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. HANIL KUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/07/2011,ALONG WITH W.P.(C). NO. 19359 OF 2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.19358/2011-T: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE VEHICLE BEARING REGISTRATION NO.KL-56-3550. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.1. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) Nos. 19358 & 19359 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner they are owners of mini lorry bearing Reg.Nos.KL-56-3550 and KL-18A-504. It is their case that on 6.7.2011 while the vehicles were transporting ordinary sand from Mangalore, the 2nd respondent seized the vehicle and proceedings were initiated. It is their case that the proceedings are now pending before the first respondent. Petitioners state that they have made Ext.P2 application before the first respondent seeking interim custody of the vehicles and that orders were not passed on their applications. It is in this circumstances, the writ petition is filed. 2. From the pleadings in the writ petition it is not clear under which enactment the proceedings have been initiated against the petitioners. Therefore this court is unable to conclude anything on the merits of the case set W.P.(C) Nos. 19358 & 19359 OF 2011 :2 : up by the petitioners. 3. Be that as it may, having regard to the case of the petitioners that proceedings are pending before the first respondent before whom they have made Ext.P2 representations, I dispose of the writ petitions directing the first respondent to consider the said representations in accordance with law and pass orders thereon. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible at any rate within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the Writ Petition before the first respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge