IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2645 of 2007(O&M) Date of Decision 22.10.2009 Kehar Singh ...... Petitioner VERSUS Buta Singh and others ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Amit Mehta, Advocate, for Mr.M.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Alok Jain, Advocate, for the respondents No.1 to 3. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL): Aggrieved against the order dated 11.01.2007, passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana, dismissing the application of the petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C., he has preferred this petition. The petitioner has sought impleadment of himself as a party defendant in the present suit on the basis of an agreement to sell dated 16.04.1980 executed by Parkash Singh. It is settled by now that the agreement to sell does not confer any title. The judgment dated 19.08.2000, passed by Addl. District Judge, Ludhiana (Ex.P1), which is not inter-parties, also does not contain the boundaries or khasra numbers with regard to which the agreement to sell was executed whereas Buta Singh son of Anokh Singh while claiming ownership of the property while detailing the boundaries has entered into an agreement to sell dated 12.12.1995 with regard to which the specific performance is claimed by him. It is also well settled by now that only a person having valid title could transfer the property on the basis of an agreement to sell, therefore, the Court will examine the title of the defendant at the time of disposal of the suit for specific performance. However, the petitioner having no semblance of title over the property could not be impleaded as party to the suit. Dismissed. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 22.10.2009 mamta-II