T.A. No. 615 of 2011 -2- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH T.A. No. 615 of 2011 Date of decision: 16.12.2011 Navdeep Kaur ..Applicant Versus Jasvinder Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr. S.S. Salar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Anil Shukla, Advocate for the respondent. JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J. (Oral) 1. The present application has been preferred by the applicant- wife under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying for the transfer of the petition titled as ‘Jasvinder Singh Vs. Smt. Navdeep Kaur’, filed by the respondent under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short `the Act'), from the Court of learned District Judge, Family Court, Faridabad to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Panchkula. Written statement filed in Court on behalf of the respondent is taken on record. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. During the course of the arguments, learned counsel for the parties have agreed that the matter be transferred to the court of competent jurisdiction at Chandigarh. 3. In view of the concession made by the learned counsel for the T.A. No. 615 of 2011 -2- parties, the instant transfer application is allowed, petition No. Hindu Marriage No. 828 of 2011 under Section 13 of the Act, titled as "Jasvinder Singh Vs. Navdeep Kaur" is withdrawn from the Court of District Judge-cum-Family Court, Faridabad and is transferred to the Court of District Judge, Chandigarh for disposal according to law. The complete record pertaining to the case in question shall be sent by the District Judge-cum-Family Court, Faridabad to the learned District Judge, Chandigarh, within one week from the receipt of copy of this order. The District Judge, Chandigarh will either dispose it of himself or entrust it to any other Court of Competent jurisdiction. 4. The parties shall appear before the Court of Competent jurisdiction at Chandigarh on 21.01.2012 at 10.00 AM. December 16, 2011 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) Poonam (II) JUDGE Note : Whether to be referred to Reporter ? Yes / No