¥ }" ^ c ^ rc^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.p.rsiNo. -T'^^i- /2oio PETITIONERf^.h— ^op'^ ..^^-0:P' ^rr'.^:^ :v ^y°"r cf^11" y"" RESPONDENTS / Rakesh Kumar Choubey, S/o. Shri R. P. Choubey, aged about 30 years, R/o. Patpariya, Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.). working as Sub Inspector at Police Academy, Chandrakhuri, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS ^" (1) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department Home Affairs, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) (2) Inspector General of (Administration), Police Quarter, Raipur (C.G.) ^ (3) Director, Chhattisgarh Academy, Chandrakhuri, (C.G.) Police Head Police Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 THE CONSTITUTION QFINDIA Aflilt HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETmON (S) No. 781 of2010 PETmONER : Rakesh Kumar Choubey. VER8US RESPONDENTS :"State ofChhattisgarh & Others. Writ Petition Under Article 226/227 OfThe Constitution Qflndia SB: Hon'bk Shri Satssh K. Asmhotri, J. Present: SIiri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocafe with Shri P.S.Koshy, Advocate for fhe pctitioner. ShriP.K.Bhaduri, PanelLa^yerfortheState/respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 24 day of febmary, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was selected for the post of Sub Inspector (Police) as per select list dated 17.6.2008 (Annexure P/5) aiid fhereafter, by order dated 21.08.2008 (AnnexureP/7)was appomtedonthepostofSubInspector. As per the requirenient, before postiiig in the field, the petitioner was sent for training. Before selection and appointment, the petitioner was examined medically aad fhere wasno complaitrt or any de&ct in his eyes. On 10.10.2009 (Aimexure P/10), on the basis offhe report ofthe Dii'ecton Chhattisgarh Police Academy, Ghandkhuri, Raipur, the petitioner has again been sent for medical exaniination of colour blindness. Shri Deshmukh farther submits that on re-examination, no defect has been pointed out aiid tiie petitioner has been fbund medically fit even in the second medical test Despite that, no posting order is being issued in favour ofthe petitioner. 2. Be fhat as it may, if the contention of the petitioner is correct, the respondent authorities are du'ected to' examine the case and pass appropriate orders in accordance wifh law, as expeditiously as possible. 3. With the aforesaid obsei-vation aiid direction, the writ petition is disposedof ( Sd/- I SatishK.Agnihotri Judge