1 mmj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.950 OF 2006 IN APPEAL NO.1090 OF 2005 IN MISC PETITION NO.24 OF 2001 Shailesh Gandhi & Anr. .. Appellants Versus SICOM Ltd. .. Respondents Mr. Vivek Khemka i/b Mr. Ajit Jakhadi for Appellants Mr.Prakash Panjabi i/b Prakash Panjabi & Co. for Respondents CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : 11 th March, 2010 P.C.: 1. Appeal No.1090 of 2005 came to be dismissed in default as per the order dated 6 th December 2005. This Notice of Motion has been taken out for its restoration. 2. The Learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant states that the parties have already compromised and, therefore, the Notice of 2 Motion does not survive. 3. Notice of Motion is rejected as not pressed for. (SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.)