THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 18122 of 2010 Between: Geereddy Ramanamma, W/o. Apparao, R/o. Kindra Village, Rajavommangi Mandal, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Additional Agent to the Government, Rampachodavaram, East Godavari District, and others. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for Petitioner: Sri K. Venkatesh Counsel for Respondents 1 to 5: G.P. for Social Welfare The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: The petitioner herein claims to be in possession and enjoyment of Ac.4.07 cents of land situated in Sy.NO.103/1 of Kindra Village, Rajavommangi Mandal, East Godavari District. The Special Deputy Collector (Tribal Welfare), Rampachodavaram, the second respondent herein, by order dated 19.12.2004, dismissed the LTRP filed by the fourth respondent under Section 3 of the A.P. Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation 1 of 59, as amended by Regulation 1 of 1970. Aggrieved by the same, the fourth respondent preferred C.M.A.No.81 of 2005 before the first respondent – Additional Agent to the Government. The said appeal was allowed on 29.11.2008 setting aside the order of the second respondent and consequently directing the third respondent to eject the petitioner from the land in question. Challenging the same, the petitioner preferred a revision petition before the fifth respondent – Government of A.P., on 14.07.2010 along with an application for stay of ejectment ordered by the first respondent. However, the petitioner’s revision has not been considered and no order has been passed even on her application for stay. Hence the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare appearing for the respondents. Since the statutory revision is pending before the first respondent, it would be appropriate to maintain status quo with regard to possession of the land in question till the said revision petition is disposed of in accordance with law. Accordingly without expressing any opinion on merits, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the fifth respondent to dispose of the revision petition pending on its file after following due process of law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Status quo obtaining as on today as to the possession of the land in question shall be maintained till the revision petition is decided. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ____________ (G. Rohini, J.) 27th July, 2010 Js.