IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41609 of 2010 RAJESH VISHWAKARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 16.03.2011. Heard. In Cr.Misc.No.32826 of 2010 which was on behalf of Sanjeet Kumar, considering the fact that particular accused was ready to compound by paying to the Electricity Board the amount equal to the loss caused, he was granted bail. The petitioner does not appear understanding the implications of the advisory role of this court and insists upon being granted bail. Since the case relates to electric theft by illegally drawing electric power causing a loss to the Board to the tune of Rs.2,45,389/- there could not be any grant of bail in such cases. Prayer is dismissed. However, if the petitioner deposits the sum of money and enters into compounding with the Electricity Board the board shall be taking sympathetic view of the matter considering the approach of the petitioner. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)