(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 7226 OF 2007 Amba Macchimar Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Hasnabad, Taluka : Bhokardan, District : Jalna, Through its Chairman, Shri Ashok Vitthal Dhole, Age : 35 years, Occupation : Fisherman and Chairman, R/o. Hasnabad, Taluka : Bhokardan, District : Jalna. .. Petitioner. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Agricultural, Animal Husbandry, Milk and Fishery Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32. 2. The Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies (Dairy), Jalna, Taluka and District : Jalna. 3. The District Fishery Officer, Jalna, Taluka and District : Jalna. 4. The Regional Director of Fishery, Aurangabad Region, Aurangabad. (2) 5. Shri Ganpati Macchavyavsaik Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Talegaon, Taluka : Bhokardan, Dist. Jalna, Through its Chairman, Sau. Rukhminbai Pandurang Walde, Age : 40 years, R/o. Hasnabad, Taluka : Bhokardan, District : Jalna. 6. The Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies [Fishery], Maharashtra State, Tarapurwala Building, Charni Road, Bombay. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. M.R. Sonawane, Advocate, for the petitioner. Smt. S.D. Shelke, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 to 4 and 6. Mr. R.T. Nagargoje, Advocate, for respondent no.5. ........................ CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 5TH NOVEMBER 2009. COURT'S ORDER : 1. The limited grievance made by the petitioner in this petition (3) is that, the representation made by the petitioner dated 5th November 2007, should be decided. By an amendment, it is also prayed that the proposal submitted by the respondent no.2, dated 9-6-2008, to the respondent nos.1 and 6, be directed to be considered by them. 2. From the perusal of the record, it would reveal that the respondent no.2 has submitted a proposal to the respondent nos.1 and 6. 3. We, therefore, dispose of the petition, by directing the respondent nos.1 and 6, to consider the proposal submitted by the respondent no.2 and also direct the respondent no.2 to consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 5th November 2007. We also direct the respondent nos.3 and 4 to consider the representations made by the petitioner and decide the same, within a period of six weeks from today. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition is disposed of. ( N.D. DESHPANDE ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/WP7226