IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.36374 of 2009 HARI YADAV, S/o Late Ram Dayal Yadav, R/o Village – Taregna, P.S. Bihta, Distt. Patna …………………………..… Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………………..….. Opposite Party. ----------- For the Petitioner:- Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State:- Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. ----------- 3. 27.10.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 304(B), 120B, 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It is also stated that the dead body of the deceased was recovered by the police after 4-5 days of the occurrence and actually the petitioner had informed his in-laws regarding missing of his wife. Learned counsel for the State submitted that there is specific allegation against the petitioner, who is husband of the deceased, in the first information report and the post mortem report also supports the fact that the deceased had been murdered. In view of the fact that the petitioner is 2 named in the first information report and there is specific allegation against him and the post mortem report also supports the fact that the deceased had been killed, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. This application is dismissed. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )