^o HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 957 of 2001 Siagle Bench: Petitioner Hon»bleShri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Respondents 2. 3. Food Corporation oflndia Through : its Distiict Maaager, Liak Road, Bilaspur. -Versus- Shri S.S. Deepak, S/o Late Aratnial VerUyaai, Retired Assistant Grade-I (General), Food Corporation of India, Dista'ict Office- Bilaspur R/o Ware House Road, CivU Liaes, BUaspur. Distdct Consiuner Fonini, BUaspur. State Consumer Fonim, Z-24, Zone -I, Maharana F>ratap Nagar, Bhopal. Shri F>rashaat Jaiswal, Senior counsel wifh Shn Vuiay Pandey, counsel for fhe Petitioner. Shri Vivek Verma, counsel for the Respondent No. 1. ORAL ORDER (16th Januaiy 2006) Leamed coiuisel for fhe petitioner submits fhat ia view of fhe decision of the Supreme Coiirt ia Reg^oaal Provideat Pund CIommissioaer Vs, SIiiv Kumar Joshi (2000) 1 Supreme Court Cases 98 that the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 are appUcable in case of aay dispute with regard to employer aad eniployees' under fhe provisions of fhe Eniployees' Provident Funds artd Miscellaaeous Provisions Act, 1952. The petitioner wants to wifhdraw ffais petition with liberty to contmue wifh fhe proceedings pendiag before fhe State Consuraer Dispute Redressal Couimission. No order as to costs. Bablu Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge