3'5^'^n^T^T, <£SitH'y41<S, [s|0iy^< ^Wvi[ sbt<|cb"""""""""t"""""""""""""""""""^ 200 31T^T 1V5W (^cj^^) ^n^r^T'f?^' ^ff^n^T sb^jcb '^nw^f^r 3?i^r SB '. HON?BLE SHRI JUSTIt;E DHIRENDRA MISHRA Contempt Cajse No. 19 OF 2008 PETITIONER ! 1. i o. 7. CM^f<n<flTi ^i+i<yIT 'Sj fe^ <H»t^|< ^T ^tRfH 3TI^?T Dharmendi'a P^osley, Aged About - 41 Years, S/o- R.D. Kosley, Panch ofWard No.12, Oram Pajicha-yat-Jondhara- Babulal Chandel, Aged about- 33 Years, S/o- Late Chandaii Chandel, Panch of Ward No.03, Grajn Pajichaya-t- Jondhara. Sheshnatii Chdndel, Aged about - 40 years, S/o- Late Panchram, Paiich of Ward No-09, Gram Panchayat - Jondhara. Aiill Taiaboli, Aged about -25 Years, S/o-Satruhan, Panch of Ward No. 18, Gram Panchayat-Jondhara. Bhuneshwar Tamboii, Aged about-26 Yeai's, S/o- Bechuram Taiiiboli, Panch of Ward No.IO, Grain Pajichayat-Jondi-iara, Smt. Kamiala Tlwari, Aged about-48 Years, W/o- Shiv Kumai' Tiwai'i, Paach of Ward No.07, Gram Panchayat - Jonclliara. Smt. Kholbaharin Bal, Aged ^ii«<k^^ ^P^Ri, ^NW^N —FS/S9— 8/2007 -—30,000. ^ii^i^T^h? ^T^I^T^W^ T^T ^IJ^I<n^, ^Tll<rl^l<o, [®|Cll<rJlj,< w^mrww^ "^ 200 ^T^T ^^ (^t^^T) ^CTW^cr^i^r j VERSU$ HESPOmSENT 8.4.2008 Shri Vmay Pandey, Shri SoLU'abh Sharma, This contempt petitic Constitution of India read Contempt of Courts Act, is 17.10.2007 (Aiinexure C/l) Vv7hereby the financial powei Sai'panch was restricted to day-to-day work till next date Shri Vinay Pandey, petitioner subniits that as p ^Rfa^JN 'HP^f "^ fe^t <P^^$l< '^'3?RiH3TI^T about-47 Years, S/o- Tal-ii Kam, Paiich of Ward No.19, j Grani Panchayat-Jondhara, All R/o-vmage Jondhara, Thesil-Masturi, Distt. Bilasur JCG] j Saiija5'? Patel, S/o- Photoraai, j Aged about - 33 Years, Sarpai-ich-Gram. Panchayat, j Jondhara, K/o Village- Jondhara, Thesil-MastLiri, Distt. BUaspi.iT- (CG) coujisel for the petitioners, 1-ounsel for the respondent. |n under Article 215 of tlie with Section 12/15 of tiie aristng out of flie order dated Ipassed in W.P.(C) No. 6258/07 of the respondent/contemnor- |iie extent that he wiU only do leetrned counsel appeartng for the r the documents filed with the ^T^^T ^^r H^II^', u -FS/197—3/2008—40,000. ^Ssaa ^I^l^T'f^t^ 'TO? ^T^T^HI^ T^T ^i^jKn^ ^-al^^<o, [®icrii^^< ^e "^ 200 3ir^r ^^ (^G(f^^t?) 1^??W ^fi^ 3??^s 3 contempt petition, it w respondent/conteninor was; powers, which are not availal order passed by this Court. Taking tnto consider^t perniitted to exercise financiy ain of the opinion that no fu|rther the instaiit matter. Accordifigly agaiiist the respondent are cbtopped In view of above, the in^ <^H?d41^ ^l*1^?^'feT:^ iF^^K ^^tRrH^IT^T ould be evident that the in fact, exercisiiig fmancial )le to him in accordance with the .tion that the petitiouer was powers on day-to-day work, I proceeduig is iiecessan/7 hi igly, the contempt proceedings .taiit petition staiids disposed of. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ?IW^T ?Nt^ ^tl^, <M-|i^tlc< —FS/197—3/2008 —40,000. ^