HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD Criminal Petition No.6973 of 2009 ORDER: The first respondent and petitioners 2 and 3 are present in person before the court and Sri A. Ravi Shankar, learned counsel for the petitioners identified the first respondent and the petitioners. The first respondent stated before the Court also that she compromised the matter at the intervention of the elders with the petitioners and the further proceedings in the criminal case may be quashed. Petitioners 2 and 3 also reiterated the same. The very Criminal Petition was filed with such an allegation of compromise and a copy of the settlement deed dated 25-08-2009 is filed along with Criminal Petition. The copies of acceptance affidavit of Qula request and the receipt issued by the first respondent are also filed. The material on record shows that the disputes are personal in nature not involving any public policy and the compromise makes the continuance of the prosecution purposeless. The inherent jurisdiction of this Court has to be, hence, exercised to put an end to a vexing litigation. Accordingly, the further proceedings in C.C.No.401 of 2009 on the file of XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate’s Court, Hyderabad, are quashed and the Criminal Petition is allowed accordingly. The parties are informed. _____________________ G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J Date: 07-09-2009 Ksn