THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1574 OF 2010 DATED: 16-07-2010 Between Yalla Laxmaiah @ Lachi Reddy …Petitioner -Defendant And 1. Yalla Ramaiah @ Rami Reddy and another. …Respondents-Plaintiffs THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1574 OF 2010 ORDER: This revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order, dated 22-03-2010, in I.A.No.721 of 2009 in O.S.No.74 of 2006, on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Huzurabad, whereunder and whereby the application filed under Section 151 CPC to consider the land in Sy.No.50/A, 51/A, 52/A and 121/A, total Ac.1.08 gts as allotted to the plaintiffs share in the partition and thereby, the said extent may be taken into consideration to impugned the Exchange deed, dated 04-08-1993, was allowed. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that the document now sought to be sent to the District Registrar does not contain extent of land so as to ascertain stamp duty and penalty and therefore, he prays to set aside the impugned order. 3. Extent of land was not mentioned in the document, but survey number with boundaries and total extent have been furnished in the petition. It is also mentioned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition the extent of land and its survey numbers, which comes to Ac.1.08 gts. By virtue of exchange deed, lands were exchanged by the defendant. Therefore, unless stamp duty and penalty is paid, the document cannot be brought on record. Hence, the trial Court rightly referred the document to the District Registrar. 4. It is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents that the plaintiffs already paid the stamp duty and penalty in pursuance of the orders of the Registrar. Therefore, there are no grounds to set aside the impugned order. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ------------------------------- JUSTICE K.C.BHANU DATED:16-07-2010 Hsd