IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2164 of 2008 Date of Decision:15.07.2009 Daya Ram & Ors. ...petitioners Versus Harcharanjit Kaur Brar & Ors .....respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate for the petitioners Mr.Rajesh Garg, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for the respondents **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J. In response to the show cause notice, respondent No.4 has filed reply, wherein Annexure R-1 has been placed on record vide which the respondents have replied to the notice of Demand for Justice issued by the petitioners. In the aforesaid reply, it has been stated that as per Punjab Government letter No.10/7/88-FPI/8014 dated 30.08.1988, the Border House Area Allowance is admissible only to those employees who were posted in Border Area on or before 30.08.1988 and in view of these instructions whosoever was entitled to this allowance has been granted the same and the claim of others who were not falling within this cut-off date has been rejected. In view of the aforesaid stand taken by the respondents, I am not inclined to proceed further in this contempt petition. Rule discharged. However, the petitioners shall be at liberty to challenge Annexure R-1 in accordance with the law. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 15.07.2009 neenu