IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 24777 of 2002 Between: M.Komal Rani S/o. M.L.Jaiswal Late Sri M.L.Jaiswal, D.No.3-3-819/1, Qutbiguda, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Transmission Corporation of A.P.(A.P.TRANSCO), Rep by its Managing Direcor vidyut Soudha, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. 2 the Assistant Divisional Engineer, Distribution VII, City II Central Power Distribution Co-op of A.P.Ltd., (A.P.TRANSCO), Barkatpura, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, or order or direction more particularly one in the nature if Writ of Madndamus, decalring the provisional Assessments notice in Lr.No.ADE/O/D-VII/C-II/BKP/HYD/D.No.172/02 dt.12.11.02 of 2nd respondent as highly illeal, arbitrary, unjust against the principles of natural justice and violative of condition No.39 of the terms and conditions of supply and consequently set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.V.NAGARJUNA BABU Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. O. Manohar Reddy The Court made the following Order: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.24777 of 2002 ORDER: The petitioner is availing power supply under L.T. category I for service connection No.H3-1468. Her premises was inspected by second respondent on 05.10.2002. He found incriminating factors suggesting pilferage. Therefore, he provisionally assessed the value of the energy pilfered at Rs.2,06,514/- and disconnected power supply. The petitioner was advised to pay half of the provisionally assessed value for availing continuation of power supply. Assailing the same, the present writ petition is filed. This Court, while admitting the writ petition on 16.12.2002, directed the respondents to restore power supply on condition of the petitioner paying a sum of Rs.30,000/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner asserts that the amount was paid and the power supply was restored. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Divisional Engineer (DE) (Assessment) concerned to pass ﬁnal order, if not already passed. As and when such order is passed, it shall be open to the petitioner to ﬁle an appeal in accordance with law. No costs. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 11th September, 2008 GHN To 1 Transmission Corporation of A.P.(A.P.TRANSCO), Rep by its Managing Direcor vidyut Soudha, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. 2 the Assistant Divisional Engineer, Distribution VII, City II Central Power Distribution Co-op of A.P.Ltd., (A.P.TRANSCO), Barkatpura, Hyderabad. 3 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{JPK}