{3 Q} (3‘1 APPEAL Ill llllllll{IH(III!(IIII/ ‘Nc ,z Fd*he1 s name Resvaence “ Le g5 3m??? W v/{al/a WW 7% ehtunced /”37( /?7”€2 “ 7457?f/<'L 2’2? g‘mvmz-n —-~« néer section‘§z-—7 ”it'is explained to the,§risoner that if he states or wishes to e remresented hv lcga1 practitioner the Appeliate Court will nOt proceed Wifn ‘he bake for eaven days unlees the.1eqal pract1tloner agpearsa If the legal practitiouer joes not appear with~in seven days he may not heard at all. If the p proceed at once with the caee an$ will n05 ed to mive a heiing to any legal wpractitioner who ppeare u a risoner seates that he §Ges not wish to be represented by legal practiotione the court m I Date of Application for com; (3E Judmement [gr éL/‘kivg Date of which cQvV received 4g g: 2n??? Date on which appeal eent 4. Whether the rieaner wish b e . 2, g3“ Pei 6;,»z'zzg“ i. r2.-. & esenued or n ~Yes/Wo. Nou 6/1111 “W i- - i .c Name “Lg/mm g/p We Continued in k: k7 ‘ ‘ A . l C {5‘ ‘ “a y“ vvi ho. 26 ‘ 19? 2J3 i 55 V haeeed e he case for favour , .p 13 ( JVF“ ?~7(ix7/J/' 9/ WW/<V ‘06 W5 operiucmnden, ate o£ receiph in C.J.M's Office ”g .Date of receipt recoré to accompany' 'LL‘ ” rdeo C.J. PEdistrate Date of recei§t in Aveeliate Court [URGUJA r Y . // Memo of Appeal oi‘the ' ’Dated Forwad't‘the NO'. >~ a Ia (em M (hhattismh gin R i ¥ ¢ m ¢ g JUii ¢ a? i Reg‘ "Guul‘ué. "Iri‘kgagnigmm Regelgt am: v 9m, gimplf ’S U gy b V r a‘ . x’ v- pi ; I; : 6 D /S r HIQH §OURT QF CHHATTI$6ARH_A3" SIkASPUR R G‘j". Na.631i2€§62 '“Ann: gllam‘ Dhamm Pmkash, 519 Bim Umgn , Aga 25 years, Gccupa‘i‘im ‘- Agricuifurez, Wt: Viiiage Argo‘l'i, RS. Lakhangyur, Distt Surguja (116.) Versggs aegaonden? State of Chhmisgarh L’Créminal Appeal kinda." Sectiog'! 374 at? Code 9f firming! Procadure None far The appeilcm‘ — i- 5hri Ajay bwivea‘i, by. 60W. Advocufe for fhe Sfafe. ' (5.8: HQn‘ble Mr. TVP. $harma, J7} ORAL JuDsMENT (Passaé ca 05*" Jaauary, 2999) This appeal is dimmed against the Judgment dafred 18-O«$-2002 passed by Firs? Addi‘tiana! Sessicms Judge affer the offence. punishable under Secfim 307 of The IPC senfenced The appellanf To Lgndergo $g53i0ns Judge, Ambikapur in SyT. No.3é9/2901 whereby learned Addifianal he'ldingkfhe appeHQn‘l' guil‘l’y far rigorms imprisonmen? far seven years and fine of Rs.1QOO./-, in defaul'r ‘Gf inayment of fine To undergo uddifional R‘IL for six mom'hs. 2‘ The appeilanf has preferred fhe jail appaat No body r has appeareq on. behalf 0f fhe appellnnf till Today/a No advocate has been appointed To represenf The appellant 3. Judgment impugngd and remrd of Court bélow perused; The applicant has been convio‘red and sentenced vide judgmenf dated 1&06—2003 complefed the soMence of seven 21-m-ZOOS, 4o 7 He was in custody from 21-10—2001 and he has ygom rigorous imprinonmen‘t on On nerusni of record of Cour? oelow,‘ aspeciauy ihe smfamen? of PW/l Dwari Ram, PW/zSono Bni, PW/3 Suryowmi, PW/4 Devsni, PW]? Dr, R5 o Ker-ketrm if appears Tho} the anneiicm‘l' has memnfed )