K r mm CH-Cv Under wamm V! K $6 11: k; axgphum m the priwner that af he stainsgm Wishes m ge we? £§%edkby leg£ pmgmmmr the A 've Cmm Wm aw proceed Mm the base for seven days amiess the [egmg prmmwme ea$ Mme mega! macmttmmar ¢oes moi appear wxt‘hum seven days he may mm imam ai aw if we pmamr smtcs that Elm does not wash to be tepxe- sentadi by legd pmmmmea' the mmrt may procwd at once mm sine case and Wm nm I he @bhgm m gnwc a heaumg w may legai mactalmmcr wim should apwax E Dam 9f Apgliwtim EM myy @f jutigemem‘ E ‘ §~ 9i, W; 2 I, Em @fwh‘mia my? temiw ‘r ‘ 9% J f 6%; 3 ¢ Date «m whm ‘AppwEnmm 2g ’2 — 9 l, wheihenr me prisamet Wishes w b3 mpwsemwd ow net ~ Yes W NO . n 274;? " JN:a’;n© IV‘CT?H~ Lemmumlm C?Vé\u %—Q[ Jam Na. W £3 L i £bm€kmckg iawmhiél“ Famard to the 'm I é . w w gmhct whmh a cam «3f «mkx passedésa the Ease fat .favomW 0 trans 1sslo§$ *7 mwQf / r "M pwgex Appamam mam: . Supermmndem ‘Eaw of rcmenpt m C 5. M s 0mm mm of mempt wremm§ m accampaay Mama af Mwwk of the Appeimtc comm v a y Dated Fatwanlw to the V Date af mam»: m AWe Court " P ‘a i g ( J WW®HE44/1Igi% ,.mm (W) WWW WM£rfgém ammm Soma . DIVISION BENCH: - HON’BLE MR. LC. BHADOO AND ON’BLE MR. D‘R. DESHMUK > 5-10-2005 When the matter is called appellant. No representation is ma Heard Mr. U.N.S. Deo,Pub! An application has been file Mr. U.N.S. Dec, learned Publi accused/appellant Manirarn hasal permanent probatién from the Cent In View of this fact, this appe nobody to prosecute this appeal. V r non-prosecution and it be consigne WT" a: r, LC. BHABOO Judge out, none present on behalf of the er Prosecutor for the State/respondent. on behalf of the State/respondent by Prosecutor mentioning therein that eady been released on 18-5-1999 on ral Jail, Raipur. ' al has become infruotuous and there is Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for d to record. V‘» “ ' Dilip Raosam s m . “‘9 VVJUdgrer ukh G11DRJ—FS/350412/2000 ‘ 50,000. H H i s