HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HON'BLESHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Petitioner Respondents WP (PIU N0.1609 of 2010 Shivesh Singh, aged about 35 years Advocate enroll No.2264/1999 S/o Shri Samarjeet Singh R/o Room No.12, First Floor Nagar Ghadi (Clock) Chowk, Raipur (CG) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Principal SecretaryWater Resources Department Govt of Chhattisgarh Secretariat, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) Engineer in Chief, Water Resources Department Govt. of Chhattisgarh Sihawa Bhawan, Civil Line, Raipur (CG) Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Through Director General 12, Khomba Lane, New Delhi 3 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Present: Shri VG Tamaskar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, learned Additiona! Advocate General, forthe State/ respondents No.1 and 2. ORDER (12th April, 2010) The fotlowing order of the Court was passed by RajeevGupta,C.J. Learned counsel for the parties are heard. !r~» 2) Petitioner Shivesh Singh, a practicing Advocate at Raipur has filed this writ petition styled as 'Pubtlc Interest Litigation' for the following reliefs: " (i) That the Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondent not to hand the entire record in relation to supply, errection and fabrication of Sluice Gate and Canal Gates all over the State of Chhattisgarh and pemse ;the same. (ii) That the Hon'ble Court may appoint a High Level Committee handed by a Judicial Offtoer Tor spot inspection which shall submit the report before -this Hon'ble Court. (iii) That the pending finalization by High Level Committee the Hon'ble Court may also direct investigation by an expert agency like Respondent No.3 which also submit eto., report before this Hon'ble court. (iv) That the Hon'bie Court be pleased to issue any other writ or writs order or orders direction or directions deemed fit in the interest ofjustice." 3) From the contents of the writ petition, it is apparent that the petitioner has made several allegations of bungting of public money in the Water Resources Department of Government of Chhattisgarh. 4) For ascertaining the correctness of the allegations made by the petitioner in the writ petition, a 'fact flnding enquiry' woutd be necessary. 5) Inour opinion, such a 'fact finding enquiry' can be better conducted by 'LokAayog'. %> .sSSat 6) In this view of the matter, it woutd be appropriate for the petitioner to file a complaint before the 'Lok Aayog' for redressal of the grievances projected in the writ petition. 7) With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Certified copy of the order as per ruets. ^ Sd/- Justice subbu Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge