IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16218 of 2010 ANUP SINGH @ GOPAL SINGH son of Narpati Singh, resident of village Loha, Police Station Sono, District Jamui, … …Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … OPPOSITE PARTY For the Petitioner: Mr. Bharat Lal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ----------- 2 12.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is in custody and seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under sections 341, 342, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substance Act. Earlier the petitioner’s prayer for bail was rejected vide order dated 29.10.2009, a copy of which has been appended as annexure 1 to this application, however, liberty was given to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail, if so advised, after a period of six months. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that though the informant was all along with the police whole night, however, he filed a written report next day. It is further contended that the wife of the petitioner had already filed a complaint case against the informant and others one month 2 prior to the occurrence. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 20.02.2009. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the abovenamed petitioner, ANUP SINGH @ GOPAL SINGH, to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Jamui, in Sessions Case No. 25/10 arising out of Sono Police Station Case No. 82/2008 with further condition that one of the bailors must be close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall state on affidavit before the court concerned, giving complete genealogy, as to how he or she is related with the petitioner. Further, the petitioner shall also remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial and if he fails to remain present on two consecutive dates in course of trial without any reasonable cause shown by him, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)