IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 806 OF 2008 Smt.Vrushali Umakant Sogale ..... ..... ...Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra ..... ..... ..Respondent. Mr.Prakash Naik, Adv. for the applicant. Ms.M.R.Tidke, APP for the Respondent. Mr.S.V.Marwadi i/by Ms.Sunita Shamu, Adv. For respondent Nos. 2 to 5. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 4th Sept., 2009. PC: This application has been moved by the complainant-first informant for cancellation of bail granted to the respondents. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has placed on record deposition of 15 witnesses whose evidence has been already recorded by the Sessions Court. Submission is that barring the investigation officer all other witnesses are already examined and the trial would thus conclude within few days. In that view of the matter I do not propose to entertain the application for cancellation of bail. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that there are criminal antecedents so far as accused persons are concerned. As I do not propose to deal with the merits of the application for cancellation of bail I reject the application solely on the ground that the trial is almost about to conclude. Copies of evidence recorded are taken on record and marked `X’ for identification.