r^t BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION CS^ N0. S /2010 PETITIONER .---"^ ^.^^'L.. '?""•'w- kv:--\.f" , \<hv' ^y k\ v< \o.-v-'" ...- ^'^>>"- ,v~-' .^J' o. ^'. ^- RESPONDENTS Keshav Singh Yadav, aged about 46 years, son of Shri Atram Singh Yadav, Ex-Constable in 9th Battalion CAF - Dantewara, Presently resided at - Vill. Kamari Kapura (Kamai) Kapura, Post Janaura, P.S. Phoop, Distt. Bhind (MP) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan,Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) 2. The Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter - Raipur (CG) 3. The Additional Director General, C.A.F. Raipur (CG) 4. The Inspector General, C.A.F. Bhilai, Distt. Durg (CG) 5. The Deputy Inspector General, C.A.F., Bilaspur(CG) 6. The Commandant, 9 Battalion, C.A.F., Distti.Dantewada (CG) WRIT PETITION U/A. 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA B s«t-HC—78 an^l ^il K;-l wn'an^iwtiN; ~3^ ^WWi, ®Ti1y]6,fs|^iy^< ,..u.e:..fcs2.^:...^iL^ 3II^['q?q; (ij*|1j«f^E() ^mwofef sii^i SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ftRITIMKER DIWAKER Shri N.K.Chatterji, couns Shri Praveen Das, Dy. G. jel for the petitioner. h.. for the State. Counsel for the petitione of fhe petitioner ia fhe presen' appeal as expeditiousty as pos^ible. State counsel has no ob the petitioner is decided expedi|iously. Accordicigly, fhc petttion respondent N0.5 to decide the| ^Fqf^h 'TTp:E^f ^'^s <r^-t^!< ^affinan^t Gricvan.ee of fhe petition^r ia the present petitioa is ftiat vide order dated 26.09.09 (ai^nexure P/5) the petitioner was termiuated and agauist tfae sa^d order he has preferred appeal on 1.12.09 (Aiuiexure P/6) be^bre the respondent N0.5 but date fhe said appeal has notbejea decided. t- subinits that fhe lunited prayer petition is for decidiag the said ection if the appeal preferred by is disposed ofwifh a direction to pendiug appeal of the petitioner if already not decided, as exFJeditiously as possible preferably wifhiri hvo laonffas froni fbe dajbe ofreceipt ofcopy ofthis order. It would be fhe duty ^f fhe petitioner to apprise the respondent No.5 about the pa^siag of this order along wifh fhe copy of ftie same. It is made clear that fh|is Court has not expressed any opinion on nierits of flie ca^ would be at Hberty to decide with law. le aud the authorifcv concertied |ftie same strictty in accordance Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge