Q) C’§v\GG’// $£NGLE BENEH IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIONtsmo. ”50% /2011 PETITIONER : /Shivnandan Sahu, S/o. Shri Janakram Sahu, aged about 56 years, >R/o. Chakradhar Nagar, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS s RESPONDENTS /1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: — Secretary, Revenue‘ and Disaster Management Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Revenue Department, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Commissioner Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Collector, Land Record, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, (C.G.) / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA HIGH C01 IRT OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5070 of 2011 PETITIONER : Shivnandan Sahu. VER SI IS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICI ,F. 226 OF THE CONSTITI ITION OF INDIA SB: Hnn’hle Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Saurabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General fur the State/respondents. Shri S.P. Navralna, Dy. Commissioner (R), Bilaspur, is present. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 06 day of September, 201 1) 1. At. the vety outset, Shri Moorthy, learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents, on instructions, submits that the order dated 12.08.2011 (Annexure P/l) impugned herein, has not been passed by a competent authority in accordance with Rule 20, I’att Il, of the Madhya. Pradesh/Chhattisgarh Land Record Manual, thus, the same is unsustainable in law and shall not be given effect to. 2. In View of the above submission made by learned State counsel; according to leamed counsel for the petitioner, nothing sluvives for adjudication at this stage. 3. Accordingly, the impugied order dated 12.08.2011 (Annexure P/l) is quashed. However, liberty is reserved to the State/respondents to pass appropriate order, if so advised, in accordance with law, in administrative exigency and in public interest. 4. The writ petition is allowed. No order asto costs. /z%;;¢ Wm (MSW Sdl-