In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … COCP No. 475 of 2008 Date of decision: July 13, 2009 Sukhwinder Singh son of Gurcharan Singh ..Petitioner. Versus Baldev Singh and others ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr. O.P.Gabha, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. R.S.Aulakh, Advocate for the respondents .. Rakesh Kumar Garg,J(Oral) In this petition, the petitioners have alleged that respondents have committed contempt of court by obstructing Phirni XYZ in violation of the undertaking given by the parties in Civil Appeal No. 167 of 1985 decided on 13.1.1987 by the learned Additional District Judge, Ferozepur as the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn on the statement made by the respondents. In their reply, the respondents have stated that they were not a party to the suit and they have not made any statement before the lower Appellate Court and thus they cannot be bound by the statement made by the Panchayat and held liable for the breach of such a statement which was not made by them. It has also been submitted by the respondents that the Phirni as in its original shape still exists and they have not made any obstruction as alleged. In view thereof, I find no ground to further proceed in the present petition. The facts of the judgment relied upon by the counsel for the petitioner in Vidhya Charan Shukla Versus Tamil Nadu Olympic Association and another 1991 Crl.L.J.2722 are not applicable in the present case as the aforesaid case was not a case of disobedience of statement made by the third party. Rule discharged. July 13, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE