1 s15 S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. TEMPORARY BAIL APPLICATION NO.6169/2009 Rajesh Kumar Vs. The State of Rajasthan DATE OF ORDER : 24th November 2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr.Kaluram Bhati,for the petitioner. Mr.Mahipal Bishnoi,Public Prosecutor for State. .... BY THE COURT The petitioner is facing trial for offences under Sections 450, 302/34, 323/34 IPC and 3/25, 27 and 4/25 Arms Act and moved yet another application for temporary bail; this time for the reason that the marriage of his sister is to be solemnised on 27th inst. The prayer so made has been declined by the learned Trial Court by the order dated 13.11.2009 with the observations, inter alia, that the petitioner's mother and brother were available in the family. Hence, the petitioner has moved this application for temporary bail; and the marriage invitation card has also been annexed to this application. The aspect of grant of temporary bail is considered in the rare cases of extreme hardship or some compelling circumstances; and cannot otherwise be taken up as a routine exercise and for securing release, for one reason or another. The material available in the present case and the attached decided bail applications make out that the matter is pending for the prosecution evidence and the petitioner was, of course, earlier granted temporary bail on 12.02.2008 but then, such a prayer, made on the ground of the wife's ailment, was rejected by this Court while rejecting Temporary Bail 2 Application No.5928/2008 on 23.10.2008. The petitioner was, however, again granted temporary bail on 18.03.2009, this time on the ground of ailment of his brother. Then, the regular bail application moved by the petitioner (S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 3455/2009) was dismissed as not pressed on 12.10.2009. Though it is suggested that there is no other person in the family to take care of the marriage arrangements but it is noticed from the invitation card placed for perusal before the Court that the petitioner's name does not even find mention therein; and, as noticed, the petitioner secured earlier temporary bail on 18.03.2009, on the ground of ailment of his brother. The suggestion about unavailability of other responsible members in the family does not inspire confidence. Accordingly, this application for temporary bail moved on behalf of the petitioner Rajesh Kumar s/o Om Prakash under Section 439 Cr.P.C. stands rejected. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to attend the marriage in police custody. Such a payer seems not to have been made before the learned Trial Court. If such a prayer is at all made before the Trial Court, the same may be given due consideration. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. s.soni