: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.609 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.142 OF 2009 Rangrao Maruti Kolekar, Decd., Thru’ Mandakini R. Kolekar & Ors. .. Applicants V/s. Ramakant Vithal Kolekar, Decd., Thru’ Chandrakala R. Kolekar & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. Vaibhav Patankar i/b. Mr. Ashutosh Gole for the Applicants. Mr. Prashant Bhavke i/b. Mr. N.V. Bandivadekar for Respondent Nos.1A to 1D, 2, 3, 5, 8A and 8B. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 14 TH OCTOBER, 2009. P.C.: 1. By the order of 25th September, 2009, the interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a) of the Civil Application was granted. By this order, the execution, implementation and operation of the judgment and decree dated 23rd September, 2008 passed by the District Judge-I, Kolhapur in Regular Civil Appeal No.346 of 1998 and the judgment and decree dated 22nd December, 1995 passed by the 2nd : 2 : Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kolhapur in Special Civil Suit No.77 of 1975 have been stayed. 2. By this application made for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 25th September, 2009, the learned Advocate appearing for the respondents contends that the order be modified to the extent that the partition proceedings before the Collector should continue and physical possession of the properties should be stayed. 3. In my opinion, such relief cannot be granted on an application made for speaking to the minutes as the order itself is very clear. 4. The Civil Application is dismissed. .......