1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.75 OF 2010 Shri.Suresh Govindrao Kokate .. Petitioner V/s Indian Audit and Accounts Department & 3 Ors. .. Respondents Mr.R.M.Pethe for the petitioner. Mr.S.N.Bhosle, AGP for Respondent No.2. Mr.A.B.Borkar for Respondent No.4. CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. DATE: 25th November, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. The breach alleged is of an order dated 9.9.2009 passed by the Division Bench of this Court. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner does not dispute that the pension has been released, but he submits that the computation of the pension is not made by taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is entitled to the benefits of the 6th Pay Commission. He pointed out that the part compliance has been made belatedly. He submitted that the release of pension cannot be treated as substantial compliance as the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 have ignored that the petitioner was entitled to the benefits of the 6th Pay Commission. 2. It is for the petitioner to make representation to the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 in this behalf. At this stage, no case is made out for initiating action under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Petition is disposed of. (A.S.OKA, J.)