1 wp 3577.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3577 OF 2011 Vijay Baburao Chaudhari .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. .. Respondents Shri P. V. Barde, Advocate h/f Shri N. L. Choudhari, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri K. B. Choudhari, A.G.P. for the Respondent/State. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 15TH JUNE, 2011. PER COURT : . Heard Shri Barde, the learned counsel for the petitioner. The present writ petition assails the demand notice issued by the respondent No. 3. The said demand notice is issued pursuant to the recovery certificate issued by the respondent No. 1. Shri Barde, the learned counsel states that, the petitioner is not been given the copy of the recovery certificate and as such, same has not been challenged. 2 wp 3577.11 2. The challenge to the demand notice which is issued pursuant to the recovery certificate cannot be entertained unless and until the recovery certificate is challenged. As no recovery certificate is challenged in the present writ petition, the present writ petition cannot be entertained. Taking into account the grievance of the petitioner, the respondent No. 1 is directed to issue the recovery certificate pursuant to which the demand notice has been issued to the petitioner, if the petitioner applies for the same and pays the necessary fees. Liberty to the petitioner to challenge the recovery certificate and the present demand notice if so advised. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/June 11