[1] DBCWP 2417/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION (PAROLE) NO. 2417/2009 SHIV SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. Date: 29.06.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK Mr. S.P. Poshwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Rekha Madnani, Addl. Govt. Counsel for State. **** The petitioner has sought first regular parole of 20 days by moving this petition. Reply to the petition has been filed. The petitioner was convicted by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.3, Dholpur and sentenced to life imprisonment vide judgment dated 31.03.2005. Reports of the Superintendent of Police, Dholpur and the Social Welfare Officer reveal that it is not desirable to release the petitioner on parole as the companions of the accused are absconding and further there are chances that the accused, after grant of parole, may also become member of dacoit who are in a gang. The contention of the learned counsel is that one of the absconder Narain Singh has been killed in encounter and another absconder is in jail, therefore, after completion of the requisite period in jail, the accused should be given indulgence of granting parole. [2] DBCWP 2417/2009 Learned Addl. Govt. Counsel has opposed grant of parole to the petitioner. After having considered the facts and circumstances as also the report available in relation to the convict, we do not find a reason to take different view than one which is taken by the District Parole Committee while considering the case of the convict. In view of this, the petition liable to be dismissed and the same stands dismissed. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK),J. (K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/