IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 10559 of 2008 Between: Md. Fariduddin, S/o. Sri Gulam Moinuddin, Muslim, R/O. H.No. 3-88, Chegunta Village & Mandal, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Collector, Medak District at Sangareddy. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Medak. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Chegunta. ..RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ or direction one or more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by directing the Respondents herein to conduct survey and based on the Survey report compensation may be ordered to be paid according to the extent of land acquired. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.D.MADHAVA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : Order: The petitioner claims to be the owner of the land in Sy.Nos.259, 253 & 254 to an extent of Ac.7.14 guntas situated at Vddiaram Village, Chegunta Mandal, Medak District. It is his grievance that the land in Sy.No.298 is adjacent to his property and some portion of his land was acquired by the Government for extension of NH-7 but however the compensation paid was not in consonance with the extent of land taken over by the Government for the purpose of road widening. Therefore, he submitted a representation on 25.2.2007 to the official respondents and also issued reminders on 5.11.2007, 4.2.2008, 25.2.2008 and lastly on 14.4.2008, in vein. Hence this writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue and at their request the writ petition is taken up for hearing at the admission stage itself. Since the petitioner has already submitted his representation seeking appointment of a surveyor to demarcate the land which was acquired by the Government and for payment of the compensation basing on the said demarcation, without going into the merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner and take necessary action expeditiously. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.10.6.2008 msv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Collector, Medak District at Sangareddy. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Medak. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Chegunta. 4 2CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of A.P. Hyd. 5 2CD copies