m (Sinqle Bench: Hon'ble Mr'. Justice Dhirendr‘a Mishra) W.P.(C) No.5501/2009 (PeTiTion U/A 226 of The Cons‘rifu‘rion of India) PETITIONER Vs s Manish Gupm, S/o Shri Abhimanyu Gupm, Aged about 32 year‘s, R/o Kudekeia, Dis’r’r.- Raigarh (CG) RESPONDENT 1. Regional Transporf AuThor‘iTy, Bilaspur (CG) 2. Secre‘rar‘y, Regional Transporf AuThor‘ify, Bilaspur‘ (6.6). Present: Mr. Ashu’rosh Shrivas’rava, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr‘. Anshul Shrivas’rava, AdvocaTe for fhe pe’rifioner‘. Mr. S. Thakur, Panel Lawyer for The Sfa‘re. Oral Order (24. O9 . 2009) 1. The petitioner has filed This pe‘rifion and prayed for a direcfion To fhe responden‘rs fo consider The applica’rion of fhe pe’ri’rioner for granf of regular sfage carriage permii’ submiffed on 28.5.2009. 2. Taking info considerafion fha‘r the application has been filed only on 28.5.2009, I am of the opinion that no such direction as the petitioner has prayed for may be issued to the respondents at this stage. The petitioner may approach the concerned authority for redressal of his gr‘levarlCes. 3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. . .u/ Sdl— Dhireadm Mishral . Judge