IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 10335 of 2010 Date of decision: 29.6.2010 Jitender @ Ballu Petitioner vs. State of Haryana. Respondent Present: Mr. RA Sheoran, Advocate. Mr. Ss Mann, Sr.DAG, Hry M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioner seeks the concession of bail in a case, registered against him at the instance of Inderpal alleging that his driver Krishan Kumar along with his Safari vehicle had been taken away by the petitioner and others. Statement of Krishan Kumar was not recorded. The petitioner was involved in the case on the basis of statement of PW Anil and Harpal, who had told the name of the petitioner to Krihan Kumar. Statements of complainant, Anil and Harpal have already been recorded. They have resiled from their statements. In view of the said circumstances, the petitioner can be granted the concession of bail. The petitioner has been in custody since 5.9.2009. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody. Without expression of any opinion on merits of the case, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds/ surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court/ Duty Magistrate. June 29 ,2010 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE