HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No. 779 of 2009 DATE: 23-12-2010 Between: Shaik Meerabi and another …….. petitioners and Shaik Sileman …….. respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No. 779 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioners herein are the judgment debtors who filed this Revision Petition under Section 115 of C.P.C., inter alia, seeking to assail the order, dated 05-02-2009 passed in E.P.No.880 of 2007 in O.S.No.1425 of 2002 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, which was filed by the respondent herein under Order 21 Rule 32 of C.P.C. in pursuance of a decree for permanent injunction, where the allegation is that the petitioners- judgment debtors are trying to interfere with the possession of the respondent-decree holder in spite of such decree. The Court below after holding an enquiry, where both sides let in their evidence, and especially observing that in spite of injunction, the petitioners-judgment debtors are interfering with the possession of the respondent-decree holder and taking into consideration that the first petitioner-judgment debtor No.1 is an old woman of 75 years, ordered for arrest of the second petitioner-judgment debtor. Having regard to such finding arrived at by the Court below, which is purely based on evidence, I do not find any warrant to interfere with the order passed by the Court below. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. However, it is left open to the petitioners-judgment debtors to approach the Court below and to give necessary undertakings, which shall be considered independently. No order as to costs. _________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J Date: 23-12-2010 YCR