IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4782 of 1996 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MADAME JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- SHRIMALI HASMUKHBHAI NANJIBHAI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR VIJAY H PATEL for Petitioners MR DA BAMBHANIA for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MADAME JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT Date of decision: 07/08/96 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Rule. Learned Additional Government Pleader Mr. Bambhania waives service of Rule. 2. Learned Advocates agree that order similar to the order made on Special Civil Application No. 14067 of 1993 may be made on this petition. 3. By Notification dated 8th April, 1996 the petitioners herein are declared successful at the interview held for appointment to the post of Surveyor under the respondents. In the circumstances, it is directed that the competent authority should take decision as regards issuing appointment order to the petitioners on the basis of their results declared under the above referred Notification dated 8th April, 1996. Such decision shall be taken within a period of six weeks from the date of the receipt of copy of this Order. It is clarified that the appointments of the petitioners if made pursuant to this order, shall be subject to the result of the other petitions which are pending before this Court in the subject matter of appointment of the post of Surveyor pursuant to the interviews held in the month of November, 1992. Petition is allowed to the aforesaid extent only. Rule is made absolute accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. ----------