IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 8TH ASWINA 1932 OP(C).No. 122 of 2010(O) ------------------------ OS.46/2000 of SUB COURT,KOCHI .................... PETITIONER: -------------------- XAVIERKUTTY, AGED 45, LATE ANTHAPPAN, POTHANAKADAVIL HOUSE, AROOR.P.O.-688 534. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.GEORGE(PUTHIYIDAM) RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. MARY, AGED 74, D/O.LATE ANTHAPPAN, POTHANAKADAVIL HOUSE, AROOR.P.O.-688 534. 2. ANNAKUTTY, AGED 66, D/O.LATE ANTHAPPAN, POTHANAKADAVIL HOUSE, AROOR.P.O.-688 534. 3. REETHA, AGED 63, D/O.LATE ANTHAPPAN, POTHANAKADAVIL HOUSE, AROOR.P.O.-688 534. 4. CHINNAMMA, AGED 59, D/O.LATE ANTHAPPAN, POTHANAKADAVIL HOUSE, AROOR.P.O.-688 534. 5. JOSEPH, AGED 54, S/O.LATE ANTHAPPAN, POTHANAKADAVIL HOUSE, AROOR.P.O.-688 534. 6. LEELAMMA, AGED 51,D/O.LATE ANTHAPPAN AND W/O.M.D.DASAN,POTHANAKADAVIL HOUSE, AROOR.P.O.-688 534. 7. MARY, AGED 59, D/O.LATE MANUEL, CHAKKALAKKAL HOUSE, DOOR NO.XVIII/6, MUNDAMVELY, KOCHI-7. 8. JOSEPH, AGED 52,S/O.LATE MANUEL, CHAKKALAKKAL HOUSE, C.P.XII/203, KATTIPARAMBU, KANNAMALY.P.O., KOCHI-8. OP(C).No. 122 of 2010 9. ANTONY, AGED 44, S/O.LATE MANUEL, CHAKKALAKKAL HOUSE, C.P.XII/204, KATTIPARAMBU, KANNAMALY.P.O., KOCHI-8. 10. PHILOMINA, AGED 63, S/O.LATE MANUEL AND W/O.ANTONY, KEMBIRI ROAD, KOCHI-2. 11. REETHA, AGED 56, D/O.LATE MANUEL AND WIFE OF GEORGE, MOOLAMKUZHAI, COCHIN-2. 12. CLARA, AGED ABOUT 46, D/O.LATE MANUEL AND W/O.JAMES, DOOR NO.1394-A, OPPOSITE TO NAZARATH CLINIC, COCHIN-2. THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------- O.P(C).No.122 of 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this 30th day of September, 2010 JUDGMENT Petitioner and respondent Nos.1 to 6 have obtained a preliminary decree followed by a final decree for partition of the suit property. Advocate Commissioner has inspected the property and submitted report and plan. The final decree was engrossed in the stamp paper. Later, petitioner and others wanted to effect mutation and it was revealed that there was some mistake in the description of property which occurred due to an oversight and thereon they filed Ext.P4, application for correction of the mistake. Grievance of petitioner is that no order has been passed on that application and it is now posted to 22-10-2010. Since the application is not disposed of petitioner and others are facing much difficulties. Hence this petition for early disposal of Ext.P4, application. In the circumstances stated by learned counsel, learned Sub Judge, Kochi is directed to dispose of Ext.P4, application as early as possible without waiting for any further direction for time bound disposal. Original petition is disposed of as above. (THOMAS P JOSEPH, JUDGE) Sbna/-