IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2192 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2192 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2192 OF 2005 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1099 OF 2002 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1099 OF 2002 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1099 OF 2002 Avinash Todankar ..Appellant versus Munciipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & Ors. ..Respondents AND AND AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2193 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2193 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2193 OF 2005 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1100 OF 2002 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1100 OF 2002 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1100 OF 2002 Avinash Todankar ..Appellant versus A.F.M. Shaikh & ors. ..Respondents Mr. A. M. Saraogi for the Appellant. Mr. P. S. Dani with A. W. Jogdand i/b. M/s. Chitnis & Vaity & Co, for Respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. DATE : 9TH JUNE, 2005 DATE : 9TH JUNE, 2005 DATE : 9TH JUNE, 2005 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. In both the Appeals stay was vacated by me because the office objections were not removed. Now these applications are filed by the appellant in order to enable him to remove the office objections. Counsel for the respondents has no objection. Therefore, these applications are allowed. Appellant is given last chance to remove office objections within three weeks from today. It is clarified that since the stay was already vacated, the Appellant will not be at liberty to apply for stay again. 9.06.2005 (D.G. DESHPANDE, J.)