1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR W.P.No. 2093/2008 Gajanan Nilkanthrao Admane vs. Kusumbai w/o Nilkanthrao Chirwatkar and others. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : A.P.LAVANDE, J DATE : 8.9.2008 Heard Mr. Kaptan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.P.Thote, learned counsel for respondents 1 and 5. None for other respondents though served. By this petition the petitioner challenges order dated 20.2.2008 passed by the Civil Judge, Sr. Dn., Wardha in Special Civil Suit No. 97/2002 by which the trial court has refused to admit in evidence the partition deed dated 6.4.1989 on the ground that same was not a registered document and as such is not admissible in law. Having heard Mr. Kaptan for the petitioner and Mr. Thote for respondents 1 and 5 and having perused the record including the deed of partition I am of the considered opinion that no interference is called for with the impugned order. Perusal of the deed of partition dated 6.4.1989 discloses that by the said deed several properties have been partitioned and value of the properties partitioned is above Rs. 1000/-. This being the position the document was compulsorily registrable under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908 and consequently cannot be admitted in evidence in view of Section 49 of the said Act. Therefore, I find no legal infirmity or jurisdictional error having been committed by the trial court 2` while passing the impugned order. No case is made out for interference. Hence, the petition is dismissed. Judge patle