IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1. Crl. Misc. No. M-10539 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 14, 2010. Arun Kumar @Rocky and another ...... PETITIONERS Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT 2. Crl. Misc. No. M-12401 of 2010 (O&M) Ganga Ram and others. ...... PETITIONERS Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. J.S.Saneta, Advocate and Mr. Ajay Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ranvir Singh Arya, D.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Both the aforementioned petitions have been filed for regular bail under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.91, dated CRM No.M-10539 of 2010 13.02.2010, under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Chandni Bagh, District Panipat. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners-accused Arun Kumar @Rocky and Satish Kumar are in custody since 21.02.2010. Petitioners-accused Ganga Ram and Dina Nath are in custody since 22.03.2010 whereas Akash Gupta @Rinku is in custody since 19.02.2010. It is further contended that offence is triable by Magistrate and the investigation qua present petitioners have already been concluded. Learned counsel for the State has not disputed these facts. However, it has been stated that main accused Deepak Chauhan is yet to be arrested. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant applications for regular bail filed on behalf of petitioners – Arun Kumar @Rocky, Satish Kumar, Ganga Ram, Dina Nath and Aakesh Gupta @Rinku, is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Panipat. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) May 14, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2