IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.176 of 2010 Date of decision: 01.12.2010 Meena Devi ....Petitioner Versus Suresh Kumar and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Parmod Parmar, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. B.R. Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.2. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for respondent No.1 states that matter has been amicably settled and suit pending before the trial Court has already been withdrawn, hence present petition has rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner, believing the statement of the learned counsel for respondent No.1, states that present petition be dismissed as not pressed. Dismissed as not pressed. (Alok Singh) Judge December 01, 2010 R.S.