1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Eighth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.12029 of 2011 PILAVENDRAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.3 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, CRIME NO.51/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.SIVASUBRAMANIAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest, at the hands of the respondent police, the petitioner, who is the accused No.3 in Crime No.51 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 120(B), 420 and 467 of I.P.C., has come forward with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of the prosecution, the land in question was originally owned by one Adhikari. He had two wives. The second wife by name Mokkathai has conveyed title for the property by claiming absolute title over the property through one Kodeeswaran. The legal heirs of the first wife of the said Adhikari are in physical possession the said property. The de facto complainant alleged that she has been cheated in this regard. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the second wife had title for the property. Therefore there was no fraud in the sale made by the defacto complainant. Further, in that, there was no role played by the petitioner. 4. Having regard to the close relationship between the parties and also considering the nature of the dispute, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with the following conditions:- 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dindigul, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously. sd/- 28/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, DINDIGUL. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. S.SIVASUBRAMANIAN Advocate SR. No.36966 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12029 of 2011 Date :28/10/2011 RJ/31.10.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/