IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8435 of 2011 VIKASH SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 04.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 420, 406 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that the complainant invested Rs. 85,000/- in the sterling Holiday Resorts on assurance of the accused persons including the petitioner that by virtue of investment the complainant will be allowed to stay for few days in a year at the resorts. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the last payment was made by the complainant on 14.11.1997 whereas the petitioner was appointed in the said company on 29.09.1997. Moreover the cheque was given by the informant in the name of the company and the petitioner was simply an employee of the company. 2 The petitioner is ready to deposit Rs. 25,000/- before the learned court below which will be invested in some fixed deposit schemes which will be subject to result of the case. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 93(C) of 2006 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned court below will at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner fails to appear on three consecutive dates during trial. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)