IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9278 of 2009 RAM PRAVESH CHAUHAN Versus STTAE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that marriage is of the year 1984. Earlier also a case was filed for demand and torture for its non-fulfilment. Continuation of demand for such a long period is not probable. A wife cannot be given liberty to file case after case only to fulfil her illegal demand. As such, petitioner’s arrest cannot be justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case no.278 of 2007(Tr. No.3813 of 2007), the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Siwan , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )