HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.22 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: Heard. 2. The interim maintenance granted at the rate of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) per month by the Courts below cannot be said to be excessive, as the gross salary of petitioner No.1, husband of the complainant – respondent No.2 herein, is Rs.14,000/- (Rupees fourteen thousand only) per month as on 07-03-2008 and the same must have gone up at least by 10% by now. 3. In the circumstances, there are absolutely no grounds to interfere with the impugned order dated 27-08-2009 in Criminal Appeal No.70 of 2008 passed by the lower appellate Court confirming the interim order of the trial Court dated 02-04-2008 in D.V.C. No.8 of 2008. 4. Therefore, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed at the admission stage itself. __________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J April 12, 2010. PV