IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH APRIL 2007 / 14TH CHAITHRA 1929 WP(C).No. 6923 of 2007(Y) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- P.S.VENKITACHALAM, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O.SANKARA IYER, 21/80, NEW KALPATHY, KALPATHY P.O., PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.RAJA SRI.R.RENJITH RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY (TAXES), GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, REGISTRATION (LICENCEE), OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 6923/2007 Y APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. COPY OF THE SCRIBE LICENCE DT. 14/1/82. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE ORDER NO. 2941/2001 DT. 22/12/2001. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE ORDER NO. 337/2002 DT. 09/7/2002 BY THE R1. EXT.P4. COPY OF THE JUDGMENT BY THIS COURT ON 25/7/2005 IN WPC NO. 23071/2004. EXT.P5. COPY OF THE ORDER NO. 29411/2001 DT. 26/8/2006. EXT.P6. COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT. 12/10/2006. EXT.P7. COPY OF THE RECEIPT SHOWING PROOF OF DELIVERY OF EXT. P6 REPRESENTATION. True copy tga S.SIRI JAGAN, J ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C)NO.6923 of 2007 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of April, 2007 JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges cancellation of his scribe's license although a vigilance case and investigation thereon has not revealed anything against him. In the above circumstances, the petitioner has filed Ext.P6 representation before the first respondent and the petitioner seeks a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P6 representation filed by the petitioner. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P6, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. The petitioner would be free to produce Ext.P5 or any other W.P.(C)No.6923/2007 :2: evidence in support of his contentions which the first respondent shall consider before passing final orders. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE css / s W.P.(C)No.6923/2007 :3: