IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.4097 of 2011 ====================================================== Sujeet Thakur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Anrs. .... .... Opposite Party/s 5 19-10-2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323, 504 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Though, the accusation is of torture and demand of dowry but it appears that the complainant was initially abducted by one Rohit Thakur for which the case was lodged and thereafter it appears from Annexure-4 that the complainant also lodged the complaint being Complaint Case No. 1533 of 2004 against her parent. It appears that earlier also a case under Section 498A I.P.C was lodged which ended in compromise between the parties. Considering the disputed relationship between the petitioner, complainant and Rohit Thakur, the reconciliation appears not to be feasible. The petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 5,00/- per month from November, 2011 to opposite party no.2 by depositing the same in the bank account of the opposite party no.2 by second week of every month. The opposite party no.2 accepts the offer of the petitioner and undertakes to supply her bank account to the petitioner within a period of three weeks by filing the same on affidavit before the learned court below. The aforesaid payment will have no bearing with regard to the relationship between the parties. The aforesaid payment will be subject to any order being passed in matrimonial or maintenance proceedings. Considering the aforesaid stand of the parties, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Complaint Case No. 1358C/2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Three consecutive defaults in making payment by the petitioner will give liberty to the opposite party no.2 to file an application for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner. Amrendra Kumar/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)