WP(C) 3165/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. K.R. Surana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. H.M. Phukan, learned State Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1 and 2. The petitioner by the present petition has prayed for a direction to the respond ent No.2 to abide by the decision rendered vide order dated 17th March, 2011 and not to interfere with the internal affairs of the petitioner/Company and also n ot to cause any harassment in running of the business in a smooth manner. It appears that the District Magistrate, Kamrup (Metro) on 17th March, 2011 pass ed an order not to interfere with the internal affairs of the petitioner/ Compan y, however, with the observation that since the maintenance of the law and order is the bounden duty of the District Magistrate, the Senior Superintendent of Po lice, Guwahati to be extremely alert and thwart any untoward incidents and preve nt breach of peace and tranquility in the area. A further direction was also is sued for detailing an Executive Magistrate to assist the police, if need so aris es. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Deputy Commissioner thereafter, issu ed a notice dated 9th June, 2011 asking all the parties concerned to appear befo re him on 16th June, 2011 for a discussion relating to some allegation and count er allegation and though the petitioner appeared accordingly and filed their wri tten representation, no order has been passed. From the averments made in the writ petition, it is evident that any order adver se to the interest of the petitioner or affecting the right of anyone, if any, t o manage the affairs of the business of the Company is yet to pass by the respon dent No.2. That being the position, the writ petition is premature and hence dismissed. Ho wever, in the event of any order adverse to the interest of the petitioner Compa ny is passed by the Deputy Commissioner or any other authority, it is open to th e petitioner to approach the appropriate legal forum, if so advised.