1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3244 OF 2009 Shaikh Nabi Shaikh Ismail .. PETITIONER VERSUS Mula Pravara Electric Cooperative Society Ltd. .. RESPONDENT Mr. P.V. Barde, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mr. Anjanwatikar, Advocate holding for Mr. V.D. Hon, Advocate for the respondent. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 1st APRIL, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Petitioner is raising exception to the order passed by the Industrial Court, Dhule on 9-3-2009 in complaint ULP no. 2/1999. 2 Petitioner / complainant presented complaint in respect of securing certain service benefits from the employer. the claim raised by the plaintiff was contested by the employer. Considering the evidence placed on record, the Industrial Court was not satisfied as regards the merits of the complaint and as such, dismissed the same. It is observed by the Industrial 2 Court in the judgment that the complainant was not in a position to depose and furnish particulars as regards his claim before the Industrial Court. He also could not disclose as to how much difference he claims and how much he received from the employer. Considering the quality of evidence tendered by the complainant, the Industrial Court was pleased to dismiss the complaint. 3 I have perused the judgment recorded by the Industrial Court and I am satisfied that the reasons recorded in support of the final order are proper and do not call for any interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction under article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition therefore stands rejected. 4 In view of dismissal of petition, pending civil application, if any, stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp3244.09.odt