IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13566 of 2009 1. RAJA RAM SINGH S/O LATE KRISHNA NANDAN SINGH EX- STATISTICAL INVESTIGATOR GRADE II, DIRECTORATE OF CENSUS OPERATIONS, BIHAR, PATNA, R/O MOH.- DEEP NAGAR, ROAD NO.- 2, P.O.- JHAUGANJ, P.S.- MEHINDIGANJ, DISTT.- PATNA ………Petitioner. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, CABINET SECRETARIAT, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI 2. THE UNDER SECRETARY GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR GENERAL OF INDIA, KOTA HOUSE, ANNEXE-I, 2/A, MAN SINGH ROAD, NEW DELHI- 110011 3. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL OF INDIA/JOINT REGISTRAR GENERAL OF INDIA KOTA HOUSE, ANNEXE-I, 2/A, MAN SINGH ROAD, NEW DELHI- 110011 4. THE DIRECTOR CENSUS OPERATIONS, BIHAR, PATNA AT TALPATRA LANE, NEAR ASHOK CINEMA, BUDHA MARG, PATNA-1 5. THE JOINT DIRECTOR CENSUS OPERATIONS, BIHAR, PATNA AT TALPATRA LANE, NEAR ASHOK CINEMA, BUDHA MARG, PATNA-1 6. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR CENSUS OPERATIONS, BIHAR, PATNA AT TALPATRA LANE, NEAR ASHOK CINEMA, BUDHA MARG, PATNA-1 7. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR CENSUS OPERATIONS, BIHAR, PATNA AT TALPATRA LANE, NEAR ASHOK CINEMA, BUDHA MARG, PATNA-1 ……...Respondents. ----------- 2/ 29.10.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the Union of India. The order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna dated 08.09.2009 passed in O.A. No. 487 of 2009 is under challenge through this writ petition. The order 2 has quoted an order dated 15.06.2009 which was to the effect that on the direction of the learned Tribunal passed in an earlier case the Review Committee on compassionate appointment considered the case of the petitioner but in view of the limited number of vacancies and large number of applicants, on a comparative evaluation case of the petitioner did not find favour. Before us the main issue raised on behalf of the petitioner is that order of the authorities dated 15.06.2009 does not contain correct facts inasmuch as, according to the petitioner his case was never considered by the Review Committee as required by an earlier order of the Tribunal. On going through the order dated 15.06.2009 a copy whereof is 3 annexed as Annexure-10, we find no merit in the aforesaid submission. Otherwise also we find no error in the order of the Tribunal to warrant interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is therefore dismissed. kksinha/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ.) ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J. )