@@” CA§pmZ m BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIONLS) No. 3 ? 92 / 2009 $Emgie emh gt. Bhawna Sahu W/O Shri P.S. Sahu Aged about 35 years, R/o M.I.G. 1/406L/ Hudco Bhilainagar District— Durg (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS - / RESPONDENTS 1- State of Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF MANDAMOUS, CERTITIORAYI OR DIRECTION OF LIKE NATURE V M Through the Secretary, t ‘ . ‘ Department of School Education . gWWK/ g v . ' D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, C.G. D\@x\ 2— Director of Public Instructions Pension Bada, Bairon Bazar Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Durg (C.G.) Block Education Officer Durg (C.G.) Principal Govt. Middle School Sector 9, Bhilai Nagar District Durg (C.G.) 90$) o WW Wmm W ‘ 317%200 j l Wwxwwm ammm PRETINKERI DIWAKER I tinsel for tl'ie petitioner. or the. State. ent petition is to the order dated ;sed by the respondent No3 by which rig as Assistant Teacher has been a mm (Wu) SE : HQN’BEE $HR£ JUSTICE 24.912999 Shri Satyendra Sahu, co Shri Arvind Dubey, PL. ChaHenge in the pres 10072009 (Annexure P/l) pa the petitioner who is Worki transferred from Govt. Middl Primary School, Shardapara. ' Contention of counsel t transferred under the ratione options were invited because f: for three places but instead transferred entirely to a differ< places for which options were g but yet the petitioner has been posted in entirely different place which itself shows that there is no'aidministrative exigency in transferring the petitioner. Counsel for the State s representation to the responde in accordance with law. is disposed of with a direction to the Accordingly, the petitiox School, Sector 9, Bhiiai Nagar to or the petitioner is that he has been lization scheme and before that the tom the petitioner and she gave option of those three places she has been nt place. He further submits that the ,iven by the petitioner, are lying vacant ubmits that let the petitioner make a it No.3 and the same would be decided petitioner to make a represen ation within a period often days f o the date of receipt of the cop of this order and the same would be decided by the authority con erned strictly in accordance with law, preferably within a further peiiod of three weeks from the date of its receipt. m