IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 11450 of 2008. Decided on: 24 th December, 2010. Shanti Devi. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No ________________________________________________________ __ For the petitioner. : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 3. : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General. For respondent No. 4. : Mr. R.S. Gautam, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition, in order to enable his client to make a representation for the redressal of her grievance to the competent authority/respondent No. 2 within a period of four weeks from today. Thereafter, the same shall be decided by the competent authority/respondent No. 2 in accordance with law by passing a speaking order, within a further period of six weeks. 2. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 24, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No