IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE NO.16932 OF 2007. KAPILDEO SINGH, S/O SRI AMBIKA SINGH, R/O VILLAGE PIPRA, P.S FATEHPUR, DISTRICT GAYA. …………………PETITIONER. VERSUS 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2.THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, GOVT. OF BIHAR,VIKASH, PATNA. 3.THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GAYA. 4.THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, GAYA. 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION,GAYA. 6.THE SECRETARY, MANAGING COMMITTEE, MADHYA VIDYALAYA, NANHU, P.S ATRI DISTRICT GAYA. ………………………RESPONDENTS. --------------------- WITH CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE NO.16952 OF 2007. MANJU DEVI, W/O SRI YOGENDRA PRASAS, R/O VILLAGE SABAZPUR SARAI, P.S SITAMARHI AND DISTRICT NAWADA. …………………PETITIONER. VERSUS 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2.THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, GOVT. OF BIHAR, VIKASH BHAWAN,PATNA. 3.THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,GAYA. 4.THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, GAYA. 5.THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, GAYA. 6.THE SECRETARY, MANAGING COMMITTEE, MADHYA VIDYALAYA, NANHU BIGHA, P.S ATRI DISTRICT GAYA. ………………………RESPONDENTS. -------------------- 02/ 22.12.2011 No one appears for the petitioners. Counsel for the State is present and would inform this Court that the 2 prayer of the petitioners for direction of payment of their salary from 26.01.1981 (in C.W.J.C No. 16932 of 2007) and 16.08.1991 (in C.W.J.C No. 16952 of 2007) is not only belated but also inadmissible, inasmuch as, the School in question of the petitioners is neither a Government School nor the Government has ever taken any liability for payment of their salary to the employees of the School in question. The petitioners could have been allowed payment of salary only when their appointment was made in a Government School or Government could have taken any liability for payment of salary of the petitioners even by way of an aided School. There is nothing on record to show that the petitioners services were ever recognized by the State of Bihar and/or its officials for the purposes of making payment of their salary. That being so, these two applications are wholly misconceived, and are, accordingly, dismissed. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)