-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7267 OF 2005 Dr.R.K.Shastri, .. Petitioner. Vs Union of India & ors. .. Respondents Mr S.V.Marne, for the petitioner. Mr S.C.Dhawan with Mr T.J.Pandian for the respondents. CORAM : V.G.PALSHIKAR, Ag.C.J., & CORAM : V.G.PALSHIKAR, Ag.C.J., & CORAM : V.G.PALSHIKAR, Ag.C.J., & D.B.BHOSALE,J. D.B.BHOSALE,J. D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 16.11.2005. DATE : 16.11.2005. DATE : 16.11.2005. PC: PC: PC: 1. By this petition, the petitioner has impugned the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal confirming the punishment awarded to the petitioner on the misconduct alleged and proved before the disciplinary authority. In paras 23 and 24 of its order, the Tribunal has given cogent reasoning why it should not interfere with the concurrent orders made by the disciplinary authority and the appellate authority. 2. The Tribunal has also noticed the legal position in this regard to the extent of judicial review by the Tribunal, like the Central Administrative Tribunal. The Tribunal has, on detailed examination of the evidence on record, come to the conclusion that there is no jurisdictional error committed by the disciplinary authority. Principles of natural justice has not been ignored. There is adequate evidence on record to -2- warrant finding of guilty and, in such circumstances, the Tribunal declined to interfere. In our opinion, therefore, no interference is called for. The petition rejected.