1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12911 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 21089 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant Original respondent VERSUS Ashruba s/o Gangaram Rakh & ors. ...Respondents Original claimant ..... Shri D.V.Tele, A.G.P. for the applicant ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 8th December, 2009 PER COURT : 1 Perused. Heard learned A.G.P. for the applicant. None present for the respondents in spite of service. 2 The applicant has preferred the present application for condonation of delay of 86 days caused in filing the accompanying First Appeal, challenging the judgment and award 2 dated 14.12.2004 passed by learned VIII Adhoc Additional District Judge, Beed, in L.A.R. No. 74 of 1998. 3 On perusal of the averments in the present application and after considering the submissions advanced by learned A..G.P., it appears that the applicant has explained the reasons for delay caused in filing the accompanying First Appeal in para nos. 2 and 3 of the application satisfactorily. Moreover, it also appears that the delay occurred in filing the accompanying First Appeal is not deliberate, willful or intentional and, therefore, same is required to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4 In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ thereof and delay of 86 days caused in filing the accompanying First Appeal stands condoned. Accompanying First Appeal be registered and numbered accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) dbm/ca12911.05