IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITON NO. 85 OF 2008 (m/s) Mayank Kashmira & Ors. .................Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and Ors. ..........Respondents. Ms. Jyoti Joshi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. B.D. Uapdhyay, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand. Mr. Gopal Dutt Joshi, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 18th June, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. A statement has been made at the bar by Ms. Jyoti Joshi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. B.D. Upadhyaya, Advocate for petitioner that the writ petition has become infructuous and may be dismissed as such. On the basis of the statement given by the learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 18.6.2009 Rathour