Crl. Misc. No. M-36727 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-36727 of 2010 Date of Decision: December 21, 2010 Rajinder Singh @ Minku …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.R.S. Athwal, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 21, 22, 23 and 25 of the NPDS Act. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the recovery in the present case is that of a drug which is covered under Schedule II of the NDPS Act. Crl. Misc. No. M-36727 of 2010 [2] Petitioner had filed an application under Section 91 Cr.P.C. for a direction to the AIG Counter Intelligence, Jalandhar, to furnish the details of mobile numbers of all the police officials who are prosecution witnesses in the case against the petitioner working under him and own mobile number and to direct the concerned mobile company to provide the call details pertaining to the abovesaid officials with AIG, DSP and accused for the period of one year. The said application has been dismissed by the Special Court, Ludhiana, vide order dated October 19, 2010. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the right of defence of the petitioner will be prejudiced in case the call details of the officials of PWs and officials of Counter Intelligence wing are not detained. After hearing counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered opinion that provisions of Section 91 Cr.P.C. are not applicable to enable an accused to secure documents which might be required by him in future for his defence. The documents which are necessary or desirable for the purpose of investigation, inquiry, trial or any other such proceedings can be ordered to be produced in the Court. No ground is made out for interference in the impugned order. Dismissed. However, the petitioner will be at liberty to secure the documents by availing any other alternative remedy available to him. December 21, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE