1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION No.524/2008 IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.1798/1997 Nanu Ram Chandrodaya v/s Arjun Lal Meghwal & Ors. DATE OF ORDER ::: MAY 22, 2009 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Shri Nanu Ram, petitioner in person. Shri R.P. Garg, for the respondents. Shri N.A. Naqvi, AAG. BY THE COURT : 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has not been paid the pay scale of Manager which was directed to be paid by this court vide order dated 10.3.1992 and subsequent order dated 8.2.1999. The respondents in their reply have stated that this court specifically directed to pay the pay scale of Rs.895/- and even Division Bench while dismissing the appeal of the Corporation observed that the petitioner is entitled for the pay scale of Rs.895/- and all arrears of that pay scale has been calculated and the cheque for the said amount has been prepared but the petitioner is not accepting the cheq ue. 2 2. I have examined the order dated 10.3.1992 as well as 8.2.1999 and also the order of Division Bench dated 27.2.2008 and I am satisfied that the petitioner was entitled for the pay scale of Rs.895/- and as such no further relief can be granted in the contempt petition. A cheque of Rs.40,417/- dated 1.1.2009 was sent to the petitioner but the same was not encashed by him and the same has been filed in this court. The respondents have brought another cheque of Rs.21,761/- dated 23.1.2009 for remaining amount but the petitioner refused to accept it. 3. The earlier original cheque which is lying in the file of Rs.40,417/- may be given to the petitioner and in case he does not accept the same within a period of 7 days, then the respondents will collect the same and send it again through registered post to the petitioner. The another cheque of Rs.21,761/- may be sent by the respondents to the petitioner through registered post forthwith. It is relevant to mention that as per contention of the respondents, the service of the petitioner was terminated w.e.f. 1.6.2000 and the appeal preferred against the said order has 3 already been dismissed. Therefore, they have prepared the arrears only upto the period 31.5.2000. 4. In view of the above facts, it is clear that the respondents have complied with the order passed by this court and I do not want to continue this contempt petition any more and the same is disposed of. 5. It will be open for the petitioner to agitate in respect of his termination order further in accordance with law 6. In view of the above, the two applications dated 16.1.2009 and 20.2.2009 stand disposed of automatically. (Narendra Kumar Jain), J. chauhan/