IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P. N_o. [é ‘gé [2006 $§§§w§§g %;3E\§§a : ‘ , Distt.— Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. ~ State of Chhattisgarh, /V Through : The Secretary, Government'of Chhattisgarh, Public Health and Family Welfare, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. I‘Dire’ctor, Public ~l—Iea1th and Family Health K' Welfare Departrifent,‘ R Services, Raipur, (C.G.) 3. ’The Accountant General of / Chhattistarh, Yellow Building, Fafadih, Raipur, (C.G.). Health 4. The Chief Medical and w” Officer, District — Surguja, (C.G.) Director, 5. Joint Fund, Accounts and pension, Bilaspur (C.G.) /4 6. State [of Madhya Pradesh, '. The Secretary, Through Government of Madhya Pradesh, Public Health and, Family Welfare, Bhopal, (M.P.) HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR I Single Bench: Hon’ble Sliri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. WRIT PETI’HON N0. 1436 OF 2006 Petitioncr: Paxvati Devi Versus Respondents: Statc of Chhattisgarh & others Present: Shri Bhupendra Siugh, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy Government Advocate for the respondents No. 1 to 5/State. ORAL ORDER (23th March, 2006) 1. Learned counsel for the petiu'oner submits that husband of the petitioner Late Shri B.N. Thakur was employed on the post of the. District Family Health and Welfare Ohicer. He \ reh'red on attaining the age of superannuation on 1.1.1987. Shn' B.N. Thakur died on 24.9.2003. 2. Accordingly to leanied counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner and her late husband had not received any retiral benefits except the provisional pension. Despite repeated representations to the concerned authorities including the Joint Director, Fund and Accounts, Bilaspur, Joint Director, Health Services, Bilaspur, Chief Medical Onicer, Sarguja Ambikapur. 3. At this Stage, petitioner seeks permission of this Court to make a representation for considering the case of the petitioner for grant of retiral benents Within the stipulated No. 1 to 5 time, to which learned counsel for the respondEnts have no objection. . Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a rcpmsentation within a pen'od of two weeks for payment of all the retiral beneots to the concerned authorities. event, the concerned authorities are directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, keeping in View urgency of the matter, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. . In View of the foregoing, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge In that Bablu