1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.403/2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION NO. (ST) 493/2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.404/2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION NO. (ST) 494/2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.405/2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION NO. (ST) 495/2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.406/2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION NO. (ST) 498/2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.408/2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION NO. (ST) 500/2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.409/2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION NO. (ST) 501/2009 Sujit Raghunath Shetty APPLICANT/Petitioner VS. The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT Ms.Anjali Patil for the applicant Mr.J.P.Kharge ,APP in 403/09,408/09 Mr.Y.S.Shinde,APP.in 404/09,409/09 Ms.Gajare,APP in 405/09 Mr.S.A.Shaikh,APP in 405/09 CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J. DATE : 10TH AUGUST,2009. 2 P.C. . Heard. 2] There is delay of 80 days in Cri.Appln.no.403/09 ,404/09 and 405/09, 86 days in 408/09 and 105 days in 406/09 and 409/09 . 3] Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant /petitioner submits that there is delay of only five days in all the matters. She prays for permission to correct the same. Permission granted. Amendment be carried out forthwith. 4] In all these matters the delay is condoned. The applications for condonation of delay are allowed and disposed of. 5] It is a case of counterfeiting involving the act of fraudulent franking and there is evidence against the accused. The accused is facing prosecution under the same offence under section 255 of the Indian Penal Code in six cases. The application under section 227 of Criminal Procedure Code in all the six cases are made and the learned Trial Judge has rightly rejected the said applications. 6] No interference is required in the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge. All the Revision Applications are dismissed in lemini. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)