IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21529 of 2009 RISHI @ MANJIT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 25.08.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner has approached this court seeking bail in a case instituted under Section 400 of the Penal Code and diverse Sections of the Arms Act. Allegation is that he was found in possession of a scooter and 03 live cartridges. By filing the supplementary affidavit, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the scooter which was allegedly recovered from the place of occurrence is owned by his father. This is what the petitioner has to state in paragraph no.2 of the supplementary affidavit: “2. That it is relevant to point out here that the father of the petitioner namely Amarjit Singh, son of Jaswant Singh purchased a Bajay Autf Scooter bearing Registration No. B.R. 1K- 0793, Chesis No. 35 CBPF. 51665 Engine No. 35 EBDT. 60766 on 9.11. of from one Rabindra Prasad.” It appears that the petitioner is in custody since 10.02.2009 In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M. Patna in connection with Shastrinagar Patna P.S.Case no. 48 of 2009, 2 subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioner. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)