IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1532 of 2006 SIRAMATI KUWAR & ORS Versus CANESKAR CHAUDHARY ----------- 2. 5.12.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioners. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. The court has given reasons for not allowing the prayer of the petitioners to examine scribe as the witness of the plaintiff. The court below has found that the examination of such scribe was not necessary in view of the fact that it was an unregistered agreement for sale and has already been admitted in evidence on admission of the other side. That being so, this Court would find that the court below has given cogent reasons for rejecting the prayer of the petitioners and there is no error in the same. This application is wholly misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/