IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2011 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 11474 of 2011(H) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- ALEKUTTY, AGED 56 YEARS, KOOTHAMATTATHIL HOUSE, KOZHIPPALLY KARA, KOTHAMANGALAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.KURIAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. JOSE THOMAS, KOOTTAPPILLIL HOUSE, KOZHIPPALLY KARA, VARAPPETTY VILLAGE, KOTHAMANGALAM - 686 691. 2. JIJO JOSE, KOOTTAPPILLIL HOUSE, KOZHIPPALLY KARA, VARAPPETTY VILLAGE, KOTHAMANGALAM - 686 691. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA - 686 661. 4. THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING,TRIVANDRUM-695 001. 5. THE SECRETARY, LAND REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. R3 TO R5 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C). NO.11474 OF 2011 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of April, 2011. JUDGMENT The issue is with regard to the proceedings under the Kerala Land Utilization order. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondents 1 and 2 had filled up certain wet land contrary to the provisions of the Kerala land Utilization Order; under which circumstance, the husband of the petitioner preferred a complaint before the competent authority which resulted in Ext.P3 order. The said order was subjected to challenge by the aggrieved party by filing an appeal before the 4th respondent (as per Ext.P4) and this led to Ext.P5 order passed by the said respondent whereby Ext.P3 order has been modified in favour of the appellant as mentioned above. Being aggrieved of the said proceedings, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P6 revision petition before the 5th respondent, which is stated as pending consideration. Petitioner is aggrieved of non finalization of the proceedings pending as above. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader appearing W.P.(C). NO.11474 OF 2011 2 for the respondents as well. 3. In the above circumstances, the fifth respondent is directed to consider Ext.P6 revision petition and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner,as well as the first and second respondents; which shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the fifth respondent for taking further steps. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. mns