IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11714 of 2011 ANIL KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and admittedly, in course of investigation, none of the prosecution witnesses has claimed to have seen the actual killing of the deceased. It appears from perusal of the impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge-Ist, Darbhanga that name of this petitioner has come in confessional statement of co-accused, Ram Kumar Mahto. Annexujre-2 is Photostat copy of confessional statement of co-accused, Ram Kumar Mahto. Even if the aforesaid confessional statement assumed to be true, then also it was not the petitioner who committed murder of deceased rather it was co-accused, Jitendra Kumar Mahto who opened fire on the deceased. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Anil Kumar Singh be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Kusheshwar Asthan P.S. Case No. 278 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Biraul, Benipur, Darbhanga. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)