IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17255 of 2011 DABLU YADAV @ RADHIKA RAMAN - Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR - Opposite Party 02/ 29.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. It would appear from perusal of the first information report that one pistol said to be made in Germany, two country made pistols, two magazine, one Vandalia in which 30 cartridges kept and three chargers were recovered from the house of the petitioner. The petitioner is in jail custody since 30.11.2010. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case at the behest of seizure list witnesses with whom petitioner has inimical term. It is also contended by him that section 51 of the Cr. P.C has not been complied with and so far as criminal antecedent of the petitioner is concerned, only two cases have been lodged against the petitioner and, as a matter of fact, aforesaid two cases were instituted by the enemies of the petitioner. Taking into consideration the above stated submissions as well as facts and circumstances, particularly, keeping in mind huge recovery of fire arms, I do not feel it proper to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in Alauli P.S. Case no. 154/2010 pending in the court Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria stands rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after 2 completion of one year in jail custody if his trial is not concluded within the above stated period. Le this order be communicated to the court concerned. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)