1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO. 1692 OF 2009 Shri Raju @ Baba Balya Khetwat .. Applicant Vs State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. P.L.Sapkale, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs.S.D.Shinde, APP, for the Respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 11/06/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.I-119 of 2008 of Kalyan Taluka Police Station. The said crime has been registered against the applicant for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 302, 201 of IPC. 3. The applicant and three others have allegedly committed murder of Somaridevi and Chotu Kanojiya on 5.9.2008 at midnight. This is a case of circumstantial evidence. Mr.Sapkale, T 2 learned counsel for the applicant, submits that except the attachment of clothes of the applicant, there is no other circumstance which connects the applicant with the alleged offence. Mrs Shinde, learned APP, fairly submitted that except seizure of clothes, there is no other circumstance against the applicant. Insofar as the seizure of clothes of the applicant is concerned, admittedly there are no blood stains on the clothes. The chargesheet has already been filed. The applicant is hardly 19 years old boy. Keeping that all in view, I am inclined to enlarge him on bail. Applicant-Raju @ Baba Balya Khetwat is directed to be enlarged on bail in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount, subject to condition that the applicant shall report to the concerned police station every alternate Saturday between 6 and 7 pm till conclusion of the trial. While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. Application is disposed of. 3 (D. B. Bhosale, J.)