-*; ^. \^^ C^p- l^cro^_ S»B.(SeFviceMatteTk INTHEI-ION'BLEHIGHCOUKTGI''CHHATnSGARHAT BILASPURteHHATTISGARHl WRTT PETmONfSt N0. ^% /2010. PETITIONER: ^/7. ^]^y\^ ^y ^^w ^' y: :".• y-ji''./: • ' '^^ . • 1. NaFayan Rratap, son OfKailash, aged about45 years, village Khs Post Karji, Ambikapur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarb. 2. Teju,sonofBhikam,agedabout40 years, vill^e KHala, Post Karji, AinUikapur, DistriGt Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. 3. Faiyam son of Sukhan, aged about 42 years, villflge Khala, Post Karji, *• Ambilcapi.tF, DistriGt Sa%uja, Ghhattisgarh. :^.'' ^:: ^.^.•:: .^^ • - :' 4: (^andhan Rain, son OfBuda,^^^d <-" about44years, village Khala, Pest K^i, Ainbikapur, DistriGtSargtya, Ghhattisgarh. 5. Biiti Ram, son ofSukhan, ^ed ^' about 45 years, viUageKhala, Post KaTJi,AEnbikapur,DistrictSarguja, eKhattisgarh. ^ ^^'; •.;:.. ;'::/':'A\:^ :..:.:" ' ^ ' 6. Pradhan, son of Shiyjan, aged -abput 44 years, viUage KIiala, pos^ Karji, Ainbilcapur, District Sai^uja, Chhattisgarh. 7. Pradhanson^ofl?iadluya8aji&,age^^^ about46years,villageGhiiga, s^^ ua 'liiiH RR BS SBI 16>1 <->/ .^.; N'awa^Nagar, Ambikapur, District Sat^uja, Ghhattisgarh. 8. Sarita,trife ofArul, aged about35 years, Laxmipur, Ambikapur, DistrietSarguja, Chhattisgarh. 9. Saheshari, daughter of LalaFt, aged about 38 years, LaxiEiipur, Arabikapur, Chhattisgarh. 10. Kancharuya, daughter of Chainru, aged about 45 years, village LEGanipur, Ainbikapur, Chhattisgarfi. tl. Suresh son ofSukhan, aged abcnit 42 years, village Khala, Post Karji, AmbikapuF, District Sarguja, Ghhattisgarh. 12. Manoj son ofKundu, aged about 43 years, village Khala, Post Karji, Ambikapur, District Sarguja, ChKattisgarh. -^':/: \; ' . :: •.:. '..'^. :' .. .". 13. JanaFdUari son ofMohitrani, aged about4&y®ars,yillageiehal.a,Posf Karji, Ambikapur, Distriet Sarguja, Chhatdsgaili. Jagsai,^oriofAinu-Sai,agedabout 43 years, yill^e Khala, P&st Karji, AmbikEipuF, Bisfriet Sai^uja, Chhatdsgarh. ResDondeiits 1. State ofChliattisgarb, Tfarbugti TKe Secretaiy, IJrbaiKAdinmisteatiQiiaatd Developnient Bepartment, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. ieommissioner curri Btrector, ;Sanchanalaya, Urban Adininistratkin and Deyelopment Departinen.t, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Collecfeor, Saiguja, AmNkap'ur, ChhattisgaFb. 4. Commissioiier, Municipal Corporation, Ainbikapur, District Sa%ttja, Cbhattisgarii. WRIT PE'CTnQNUNDERAR'nCLE2260FTHE <X)NSTT TION OE INDIA -HC—7S HWWf (tlHI^ ^ST "4i*ii<n<4, sitil'y'Ko, fs<dl'91J,'(. ^..........1^.02..^^^^ sn^r ~^v ('yf^fi) sn^i^ifrfe ?W3n%?igrqw TCtIW^fean^iI ^<ifci<il*l •Ri+Knf '£ffS^ Tf^T^R ^sffiiHsiT^r SB : Hon'ble ShriManindrantohan Shrivastava. J. 19.8.2010 Shri Harish Khuntiya, Ajdvocate appears on behalf ofShri C.J.K. Rao, counsel for the petitioner^. Shri Vinod Tekam, Pane|l Lawyer for the State/respondents No.l, 2 6s 3, on advance copy. Heard on admission. The petitioners have filejl this petition claiming regularization. Learned coynsel for th^ petitioners submits that the petitioners are entitled to be regularized |in service on the basis of Circular dated 5th March, 2008 (Annexure purposes of regularization as in view of the judgment Supre P-3) of the State Government for the one time measure in appropriate cases, ic Court in the case of Secretary, State of Kafna.tab&as.d others Vs.lUmadevi (3) SB others. (2006) 4 SCC 1. Learned counsel for similarly situated employees respondent No.4 vide order petitioners has not been petitioners prays that the representation for consideratij After hearing learned appropriate to finally dispo^ le petitioners submits that number of kere granted benefit of regularizadon by dated 19.12.2008, but the case of the considered. Learned counsel for the )eUtioners may be permitted to make >n of their case. ;ounsel for the petitioners, it would be se off the petition with liberty to the ..^^!^^1 ^sa ^%^s •a *Wg6 ^i*-^i .-,,.,^XI-HC—7S 'FSf «LIN10l<<, ®tlly-i|<o,fa|<vll'Mlj,< *iWW «hW«f> WI, 200 3TT^I'[ra^ (•jcll381<t<t) an^iT^if^fe ^T^n 3TT^T ffi+ifjtft Praveen TOIWIT ^ifN sn^i 2.. loln petitioners to file representatio) No.4. On such representatioi consider the case of the petit] ,MarcK',*2%g (Annexure P-3)| strietly;in;a.Geordance with the| the case ofUniadevi (supra). With the aforesaid obsetvations, the petition is finally disposed off. 1>l«l[<1llt 11*lcif ^f ft<3> <Rlt<;K ^TajfipTsn^r |n raisitig fheir grievances, to respondent jis being raade, respondent No.4 shall (oners in the light of Circular dated 5th issued by the State Govemment and law laid down by the Supreme Court in Sd-/ Manindra Mohan Shrivastava ~~a- ^ Judge m ^^!^fc: :ag