1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 1000 OF 2006 Shankar s/o Kondiba Bhandare ...Appellant VERSUS Kachru s/o Narayan Bhandare ...Respondent ..... Shri A.P.Bhandari, advocate for the appellant Shri U.R.Chavan, advocate for respondent ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATED : 21 st February, 2011 PER COURT : 1 Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2 Appellant, namely Shankar Kondiba Bhandare i.e. original plaintiff, as well as respondent, namely Kachru Narayan Bhandare 2 i.e. original defendant are present today in person in court, and they have tendered the terms of compromise in court. The said terms of compromise disclose that it bears left hand thumb impression of the appellant as well as it bears signature of the respondent. 3 Moreover, the said terms of compromise also bear the signatures of Shri A.P.Bhandari, advocate and Shri U.R.Chavan, advocate for the respondent. So also it bears signatures of consenting parties Gnyanoji Kachru Bhandare and Ganpat Kachru Bhandare. 4 The appellant and the respondent admit the contents of the said terms of compromise and their respective signatures thereon. Accordingly, the said terms of compromise are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification purpose. 5 It appears that there are undertakings in clause 8-A, 8-B and 8-C of the said terms of compromise and the said undertakings are accepted and taken on record. 6 Accordingly, the decree passed in Regular Civil Suit No. 61 of 1994 filed by the appellant before the Civil Judge, Junior 3 Division, Kalamnuri stands confirmed in view of the terms of the said compromise and present Second Appeal stands disposed of. No costs. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) dbm/sa1000.06