IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No.: 5725 of 2008 Date of decision: 18.10.2010 Narinder Pal … Petitioner. Versus The Commissioner-cum-Secretary and another …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. . For the petitioner: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Advocate. For the respondent No.1: Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, Addl. A.G. For the respondent No.2: Mr. S.D.Gill, Advocate. Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) 1. By means of this petition the petitioner has challenged the appointment of respondent No.2 as Peon. According to respondent No.1, respondent No.2 was not appointed by way of promotion but by way of direct recruitment. 2. Shri Vinay Kuthiala, learned counsel for the petitioner states that as per his instructions there is one post of peon falling to the category of promotional quota lying vacant and this post is to be filled from the scheduled caste candidate. 3. If that be so, the petitioner may make a representation in this behalf within three weeks from today 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes. 2 and on such representation being made the respondent No.1 shall take a decision on the said representation within six weeks thereafter. In case as averred by the petitioner there is a promotional post available and the petitioner is within the zone of consideration he shall be considered for appointment to the post of Peon/Daftri. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No order as to costs. 18th October, 2010 ( Deepak Gupta ) ™ Judge.