THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.3021 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.164 of 2009 in the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa, against the respondents, for the relief of perpetual injunction. It is stated that an order of ad interim injunction was granted on 17.03.2009 and it is in force. The petitioner filed I.A.No.805 of 2009 with a prayer to appoint an Advocate-Commissioner to note down the physical features. Thereafter, he filed I.A.No.927 of 2009 with a prayer to direct the Commissioner to measure the suit schedule property as well as the neighbouring property of the respondents on the basis of the title deeds. The trial Court partly allowed the I.A. by directing the Commissioner to measure the property of the petitioner but rejecting the prayer for measurement of the property of the respondents. The petitioner challenges the latter portion of the order. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The appointment of an Advocate Commissioner in a suit for perpetual injunction itself is an extra- ordinary measure. It is for the plaintiff in a suit of that nature to satisfy the Court that he is in possession of the suit schedule property. The very direction issued by the trial Court to measure the property of the petitioner on the basis of the sale deed itself is somewhat extraordinary. Not being satisfied with that, the petitioner wants the Commissioner to measure the property of the respondents also. Such a measure is totally outside the scope of the suit. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 23.07.2010 JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.3021 of 2010 Date: 23.07.2010 JSU