K¥*( £Ui-?-.U'»« C-7- f0-D ^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASFUR (C.G.l W.P.flNo, <«- PETITIONERS: v^^ RESPONDBNTS: l.Ram Kumar Patel , S/o Shri Janakrain Patel Aged about 39 years working as Asst. Teacher, Govt. Priinary School Baghanpur, sarangarh R/o Parsadih, Post Hardi Tehsil Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). ,State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary ,Public Education Department Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ^ District Education officer Raigarh , Dist. Raigarh PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 2^6 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF J^'ROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHBRSXJITABLE WRITS AND DIKECTIONS:- r' ^. XI-HC-78 MIHWI aiHlch 3ST "4|i|ld<'<, ®T(1yis,RK'11+iy ..^•..P..C^.^.3^ ^ 2007 311^1 y^cb ('iqt^^r) 3:(1^TqiTf^IR; crar^i^isbtii* Bablu ^ ?THTW^f?tT3I1^T 23^.2007 Mr. Hariah MwitKi, counsel f^r Ifw petH'ioners Ms. Sunitc Jain, Ponel l<»»yei|- With the consent of learned are heard finally and disposed of. Common order dictoted in VI(|P. (s) No. 366 of 2007 in ^>en Court, possed separotely. cbi<<I<-iin.i 4i^<A'irte^t<Ri^;i<. ^siRtirsn^r for •the reapondents/St'ate. counsel for •the port-ies, the mattcrs Sd/- : Satish K.Agniliotri Judge P.T.O. HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6i4ftH AT MLASPUR W. P.fS) No. 366 <rf 20)7 Petitioner ; Nond Ram Jangade Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh & o-thers W. P.fSl No. 368 <rf 2007 Petitioners : Scrita Barsagode and olhers Versus (te^wndents : Slate of Chhattisgorh & o'thcrs /knd W. P.fSJNo. 369 «rf2007 Petitioner : Ram Kumar Putel Wersus Respondents ; State of Oihattisgarh & anol+iw SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. Agidhotri. J Present: Msr. Harish Khutia, Advocate for the petitfoners. Ms. Sunita Jain, Plo»iellawyer for the respondents/State. OROER 0>assed on 2.3rd dcy of Jamwry, 2007) 1. Lecmed counset oppearing for Ihe petitioners as —ellas for the Statcs/respondents jointly submit that the facts of the present urit petitions are similau' 1o that of in W. P. No. 4725/2006 (Am<u- Sai Ram & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh A others), which NNS disposed ®f vide order dated 1.9.2006 (Amexure P/2). They fwther subnut that the question of 1®»Nivolved is also the same. 2. In view of the above stated submissions made by leamed couisel for the parties, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of Ihe order ctated 1.92006 pnaBed by Ihis Court m WP. No. 4725/2006. No order astocosts. 3. A copy of •this order be ptaced bn record in oonnected wit petitions. Bablu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge