THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WP NO.24988 OF 2000 ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Smt Justice T.Meena Kumari ) Questioning the order dated 17-11-1999 in O.A.No.7492 of 1997 passed by the 2nd respondent as illegal and arbitrary, the present writ petition has been filed. 1st respondent-applicant was appointed as NMR Works Inspector on 10-07-1987 in Tribal Welfare Engineering Division, Paderu. Subsequently, he along with others was terminated in the month of April/May, 1993. Pursuant to the orders dated 2.5.1994 in WP No.159 of 1994 of the Apex Court, the Government issued G.O.MS. No.212, dated 22.4.1994 reinstating the NMR Workers of Rampachodavaram Division and issued another G.O.Ms.No.898, dated 6-12-1994 for regularization of their services. But, the Government did not take any action with regard to NMR Workers of Paderu Division. Hence, the 1st respondent- applicant along with others filed OA No.7439 of 1994 and the same was disposed of directing the respondents therein to consider the claim of the applicants therein. However, the Government issued Memo dated 1-7-1997 directing the Chief Engineer, Tribal welfare to reinstate one K.Nagireddy. But, no steps were taken to reinstate the 1st respondent-applicant and as such, he filed the OA impugned herein. Counter-affidavit was filed in the said OA contending that the 1s t respondent-applicant is not eligible for regularization of services and absorption either as per G.O.Ms.No.143 or G.O.Ms.No.212. The Tribunal after analyzing all the material available on record held as under: “No plausible or convincing reason is given in the counter as to why and how discrimination was shown between two parties who obtained similar orders from the Tribunal. If Nagireddy is entitled to be considered by virtue of the orders of the Tribunal in O.A.No.7439 of 1994 the applicant who is similarly placed and also one of the applicants in the said OA is also, according to us, is entitled for reinstatement on par with the said Nagireddy. Not only the applicant but also the other applicants in the said OA are entitled for the same relief which was extended by the benevolent Government in favour of said K.Nagireddy. We are of the considered view that on the ground of discrimination alone the OA has to be allowed. In the result, the OA is allowed with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the applicant also on par with K.Nagireddy and pass appropriate orders within a period of two months.” Heard the learned Government Pleader for Finance and Planning and perused the material available on record. A perusal of the record shows as per the order dated 2.5.1994 in WP No.159 of 1994 of the Apex Court, NMR Workers of Rampachodavaram Division were reinstated. Further, when the applicant and others questioned the same in OA No.7439 of 1994 and one K.Nagireddy was reinstated. But, the applicant was not reinstated. So, he filed the present OA and the Tribunal while allowing the same, directed the respondents to consider the case of the applicant also on par with K.Nagireddy. Hence, there is no error apparent on the face of the record and the order of the Tribunal was perfectly justified and it needs no interference and the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. _____________________________ (JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI) _______________________________________ (JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA) rkk Dated: 27-07-2010