.4jii'® nt': ^M6a"S8»a HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 484 of 2002 Petitioner Ramkrishna Mahobia (siace dead) tttrough L.Rs, Sint. Kamlesh Mahobia & anoftier Versus Respondents Unionoflndia&otliers (V/rit Petition iinder Article 226 ofthe Constitution of (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri Raj Kam.al Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri. Abhishek Siaha, Advocate for fhe respondents. 2. ( Passed on fhis 20th day ofJaiiuaT»r, 2010) Hearcl. It is iafoiined by leanied couasel appeailag for tlie responclents tliat fhe ruatter beiiig a semce dispute, the Centi-al Admiaistrative Tribunal has jurisdictioa to look into the dispute aiid pass appropriate order. The High Coun iti exercise of its extraordinary power uiay not entertsill this writ petition, which is a service dispute. Accordingly, on fh.e request of leat-aed counsel appearuig for fh.e petitioner, Gie writ petition is disiaissed as wiflidiuwn, wifh Mbert}-' to take recourse to the provisions of ftie Adniiaistrative Tribunals Act, ifso advised. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur