IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23463 of 2010 SHANTI DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 09.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 353, 34 of the I.P.C. and Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. It is alleged that during raid, two women were arrested, namely, Shanti Devi and Mobina Khatoon and from possession of Mobina Khatoon Naxalite literature was recovered and from possession of this petitioner some clothes were recovered. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from possession of this petitioner and it is further submitted that the petitioner is involved in one another case being Madanpur P.S. Case No. 232 of 2009 under Sections 147, 149, 353, 307, 379, 427 of the I. P. C. and Section ¾ of the Explosive Substances Act and Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act on mere suspicion. Considering the fact that nothing has 2 been recovered from the petitioner, let the petitioner, Shanti Devi, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Aurangabad, in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 23 of 2010. The petitioner will make herself available at Madanpur P.S. on every fortnight for giving attendance at the police station and the Officer-in-charge of Madanpur Police Station will forward the regular attendance to the Superintendent of Police, Aurangabad, and the same will be transmitted to the court of the learned C.J.M., Aurangabad for keeping it on records. The learned C.J.M., Aurangabad, will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if she fails to appear fortnightly before the Officer-in-charge, Madanpur police station, or she herself gets involved in similar type of case. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)