IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.17322 of 2010 Date of decision: 24.9.2010 Sat Pal …..Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ……Respondents CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon’ble Mr.Justice Augustine George Masih Present: Mr.Deepak Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) In this writ petition, prayer is to quash notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short, the Act) on 26.9.2007 (P3) and 25.9.2008 (P4), respectively. During arguments, it transpired that after issuance of notification under Section 4 of the Act, the petitioner has not filed any objection. If that is so, in view of ratio of judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Star Wire (India) Ltd. v. State of Haryana, (1996) 11 SCC 698; Municipal Council Ahmednagar v. Shah Hyder Beig, (2000) 2 SCC 48; C. Padma v. Dy. Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, (1997) 2 SCC 627; and M/s Swaika Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, JT 2008 (2) SC 280, this writ petition cannot be entertained. The petitioner has already filed a representation, wherein he has stated that he had purchased house vide sale deed dated 4.1.2006. We have perused the sale deed. It is specific case of the petitioner that in some cases, where objections were not filed, constructed portion of the residential house has Civil Writ Petition No.17322 of 2010 been left out of acquisition and even adjoining house to the house of the petitioner, has been left out of acquisition. In view of facts of this case, the petitioner may press his representation before the Land Acquisition Collector, who shall pass an order taking note of the averments made therein, as per law and if possible, the relief be given to the petitioner as prayed for. Disposed of. (Jasbir Singh) Judge 24.09.2010 (Augustine George Masih) gk Judge 2