IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO : 23671 of 2008 Between: V. Suresh S/o. Govinda Swamy, O/o. Project Officer, Rajiv Vidya Mission (SSA), Warangal, Warangal Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Rajiv Vidya Mission (SSA), A.P., Hyd. Rep. by its State Project Director S.C.E.R.T. Compound, Opp. L.B. Stadium, Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Joint Director School Education Warangal, Warangal Dist. 3 The Project Officer Rajiv Vidya Mission (SSA) Warangal, Warangal Dist. 4 The District Collector and Chairman Rajiv Vidya Mission (SSA) Warangal, Warangal Dist. 5 The District Educational Officer Warangal Dist. Warangal. 6 B. Jayaveer Rao Warangal Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records relating to and in connection with the Quash orders passed by the Honorable A.P. Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.8642 of 2008 dated 24-10-2008 admitting and issuing notice without granting interim orders for cancellation of the deputation Quash orders of the Writ Petitioner in Rc.No.31/RVM(SSA)B1/2008 dated 22-10-2008 as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially declare that the Petitioner is entitled to continue up to the extended period of one year i.e. till the end of February, 2009. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.V.RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This writ petition is ﬁled questioning the orders passed by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal in admitting O.A.No.8642 of 2008 dated 24.10.2008 and issuing notice without granting interim orders on the cancellation of the deputation orders of the writ petitioner in Rc.No.31/RVM(SSA)B1/2008 dated 22.10.2008 and posting the unoﬃcial respondent in the place of the petitioner as arbitrary and illegal, and for a consequential direction to continue the petitioner up to the extended period of one year i.e. till the end of February 2009. The case of the petitioner is that he was working as Headmaster in U.P. School, Moulali, Warangal District. The ﬁrst respondent issued proceedings dated 22.02.2007 deputing the petitioner to work as Alternative Schools Coordinator, Warangal for a period of one year as per the terms and conditions of G.O.(P).No.10 Finance and Planning Department dated 22.01.1993. Thereafter, by order, dated 24.03.2008, the ﬁrst respondent extended the said period by one more year from the date of expiry of one year. Though the said period is in force, the impugned order came to be passed on 24.10.2008 to favour the unoﬃcial sixth respondent. Aggrieved by the action of the ﬁrst respondent the petitioner ﬁled O.A.No.8642 of 2008 before the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, challenging the order dated 22.10.2008 passed by the ﬁrst respondent on the ground that once extension order is granted, he is entitled to continue up to expiry of extension period. The Tribunal by the impugned order admitted the said O.A. and issued notice without granting any interim orders. The petitioner contends that if he is transferred to another place, the entire career of his children, who are taking long term coaching for EAMCET at Warangal, will be disturbed. Hence this writ petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Services-I. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that though the petitioner is having four months time, he has been suddenly transferred. Since his children are taking long term EMACT coaching at Warangal, it will eﬀect the education of the children. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage directing the Tribunal to dispose of the interlocutory application ﬁled by the petitioner in O.A.No.8642 of 2008 within a period of two weeks after aﬀording appropriate opportunity to both the parties. Till such time, status quo obtaining as on today shall be maintained. ________________________ (GHULAM MOHAMMED, J.) _______________________ (G.BHAVANI PRASAD, J.) 30th October, 2008 Js.