WP(C) 4257/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.MUSAHARY Heard Mr. B.Buragohain, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.H.K.Sa rma, learned Standing Counsel, ASEB. A statement has been made by Mr.Sarma, learned S.C. that the outstanding bill has already been paid by the petitioner . There is no other claim except t he current bills for electricity consumption. Mr. Buragohjain, learned counsel f or the petitioner submits that out of two surviving brothers the younger brothe r, the present petitioner, filed an application dated 13.9.2009 followed by rem inder dated 15.9.2009 for reconnection of the electricity as well as transfer o f the electricity connection in the name of the present petitioner. The father o f the petitioner along with the elder brother has filed objection for which elec tricity connection could not be transferred in the name of the present petition er. Mr. Sarma, learned S.C. fairly submits that the grievance of the petitio ner can be considered inasmuch as no outstanding bill is pending provided the cu rrent bill is paid regularly and subject to fulfillment of the terms and conditi ons in the Regulation of the Electricity Act, 2003. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with the directi on to the respondents-ASEB to consider the case of the petitioner for transferri ng electric connection in his name subject to fulfillment of the terms and condi tions in the Regulation of the Electricity Act, 2003. The petitioner shall file fresh representation before the ASEB and on fi ling such representation, the respondent-ASEB shall consider and dispose of the representation within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of the repr esentation. This writ petition stands allowed and disposed of.