1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. /2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.167/1995 Appellants :- 1. M/s Gokul Enterprises, near Ram Mandir, Tilak Road, Mahal, Nagpur. 2. Arun s/o Omprakash Kapoor, aged 45 years. 3. Harish s/o Omprakash Kapoor aged 40 years. Nos.2 and 3, both partners of appellant No.1, residents of Tilak Road, Mahal, Nagpur. ...Versus... Respondents :- 1. Chandrashekar s/o Trimbak Vazalwar, aged about 52 years, resident of Dharampeth, Nagpur. 2. Vishwanath s/o Trimbak Vazalwar aged about 56 years, resident of Mahal, Nagpur. 3. Mrs. Ragini w/o Pradeep Kshirsagar aged about 30 years, Occupation : Medical Practitioner, Hanuman Nagar, Nagpur. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 [Shri A.S. Mehadia, Adv. for appellants] [Shri W.G. Somalwar, Adv. for respondents] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 17.12.2009 1. This civil application for recording compromise is tendered today by learned Counsel for both the parties. 2. Office to register it and put the appropriate number. 3. Learned Counsel for the appellants and respondents so also the appellants and respondents are present in the Court. The present application for recording compromise has been signed by all of them. The same is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. 4. Compromise appears to be bona fide and the same will have to be accepted. Hence, Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of clause (a) to (d) mentioned in compromise application. In addition, it is clarified that respondent Nos.1 and 2 shall be entitled to withdraw the entire amount of rent deposited in the trial Court by the appellants. 5. Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. 6. Second Appeal No.167/1995 is disposed of in terms of the above compromise. No order as to costs. JUDGE ssw