IN THE COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc. No.M-1475 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION:February 24,2011 Kapil .....Petitioner versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.Gautam Dutt, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Tarun Aggarwal, Senior DAG, Haryana. RAJAN GUPTA, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 438 CrPC seeking pre arrest bail in a case registered against the petitioner under Sections 341,365,384,392,506 IPC at Police Station City Gurgaon vide FIR No.468 dated 27.8.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case and nothing is to be recovered from him. He is, thus, entitled to concession of pre-arrest bail. Learned State counsel has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that the petitioner is involved in four other cases of similar nature and his custodial interrogation is required to take investigation to its logical end. The case was registered on the basis of complaint made by one Nikhil Kawatra. He alleged that on 27.8.2010 about 4.00 p.m. he alongwith his friends had come out of Barber shop. At that time, four young boys came in a car No.DL9CD/8580 and assaulted them. One of them, namely, Nikhil Kawatra (complainant) was given beating. Thereafter, Rs.4,500/- and one mobile were snatched from the complainant at the Basai bridge. Another demand of Rs.50,000/- was made from Manjit, who was accompanying the complainant. Threats were Crl.Misc. No.M-1475 of 2011 -2- also extended to them. In view of the nature of allegations contained in the FIR, I am of the considered view that the petitioner is not entitled to the concession of pre-arrest bail. The petition is devoid of merit and the same is hereby dismissed. February 24, 2011 (RAJAN GUPTA) kd JUDGE