THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.27849 of 2008 ORDER : Heard Sri K.S.Murthy, learned counsel fro the petitioner and Sri Y.Ravindra, learned standing counsel for Respondents 2 and 3. None appeared for Respondents 4 and 5, despite service of notice. The petitioner claims to have purchased house sites bearing Plot Nos.188 and 189 situate in Greenlands venture of GPR Housing Private Limited at Muttangi Village, Patancheru Mandal, Medak District, under a registered sale deed executed on 06-06-2003. The said venture is located in Sy.Nos.202/AA, 203/AA, 220/E, 202/A, 203/AA and 220/EE. The said sites were taken by the respondents for the purpose of development of the Outer Ring Road. The petitioner claims that insofar Plot No.188 is concerned, she has been paid compensation, but insofar as plot No.189, the respondents 2 and 3 have not paid any compensation. The petitioner states that the 4th and 5th respondents set up a claim for the said Plot No.189 without having any manner of right and the respondents without making any enquiry, paid compensation to them in addition to allotment of alternative sites. Contending that the Respondents 4 and 5 are not entitled for allotment of any alternate plots and that the respondents 2 and 3 failed to discharge their obligation of conducting enquiry before identifying the eligible persons, they have filed this Writ Petition for the relief sought for. During the course of hearing both the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the Respondents 2 and 3 as well would represent that an issue of similar nature is covered by orders of this Court in W.P.No.15054 of 2008, dated 28-10-2009 and seek similar orders in the present writ petition also. Following is the relevant portion of the said order : “13.There appears to be some controversy relating to the sale deeds pertaining to the property in question in favour of the petitioners and also the 4th respondent as well. This Court is not inclined to express any opinion relating to the other merits and demerits. It is needless to say that these aspects may have to be gone into by the competent Civil Court. 14. Hence, in the light of the facts and circumstances and in the light of the stand taken in counter affidavit, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to refer the dispute in question to a competent Civil Court under Section 18 (ought to be Section 30) of the Act so as to enable the contesting parties to have their dispute settled before the competent Civil Court in accordance with the Act. Till the dispute is decided by a competent Civil Court, no further disbursement of the amount or allotment of plot to be made.” In view of the said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order of this Court. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J. 01st February, 2011. Note : Issue C.C. in one week. B/O skmr