1 APPW 395.11.sxw JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 395 OF 2011 WRIT PETITION NO.1905 OF 2011 Bharat Chhaganbhai Khadela. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents. Mr. Niranjan Mundargi i/b. Mr. Abhishek Yende for the Applicant. Mr. Rajesh More, APP for the State. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 26th AUGUST 2011. P.C. :- Heard. 2. The learned Counsel for the Applicant - husband is allowed to amend the Bail application wherever irrelevant reference to the events having taken place in this Court are indicated. 3. Learned Counsel for Respondent No.2 - wife is present. She waives service. 4. The Petitioner is allegedly in arrears of maintenance to the tune of Rs.2.5 lakhs. 2 APPW 395.11.sxw 5. The learned Counsel for Respondent No.2 - wife submits that this is second occasion the Petitioner Bharat has flouted orders of the Court and was required to be taken in custody. She says, the Petitioner Bharat has means to pay the amount as he is a diamond merchant of worth. 6. Upon the Petitioner Bharat paying an amount of Rs. 1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand only) by a banker's cheaque directly to the Respondent No.2 - Smt. Sonal Bharat Khadela upto 30th August 2011, the Applicant Bharat be released on his furnishing P.R. Bond and surety in the sum of Rs.5,000/-. If the Applicant fails to pay the amount on the stipulated date, the result would be, he would be taken back in custody. 7. The Application is allowed to the extent as above. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)