IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.12395 of 2011 Date of decision : 19.12.2011 Dr.Rajender Singh Dalal ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Mr.Rajbir Sehrawat, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Sunil Nehra, Sr.DAG, Haryana for the respondents. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The petitioner alleges that he is a contractual employee which employment he got after retirement. Annexure P-1 is terms of employment which restrict the honorarium to the pay last drawn. The grievance of the petitioner is that this condition has been violated in view of the fact that the pay of the petitioner stands revised by way of the recommendations of the 6th Pay Commission and thus he is entitled to the increased honorarium on the basis of the increase that he has earned by way of the aforesaid recommendations. On due consideration of the matter, I am of the opinion that the petitioner being a contractual employee is aggrieved by the violation of the term of the contract for which he has a civil remedy. Mr. Sehrawat prays for permission to withdraw the instant petition C.W.P.No.12395 of 2011 -2- with liberty to avail himself of the remedy under the civil law. Disposed of with the liberty aforesaid granted. 19.12.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss