- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2894/2009 Dr.Vijaykumar Gopinath Wagh. ...Petitioner.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents... ..... Shri M.R. Kulkarni, Advocate for petitioner. Shri V.H. Dighe, AGP for respondent no.1. ..... CORAM: V.C.DAGA & A.V. POTDAR,JJ. DATE: 14.07.2009 PER COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner was appointed by order dated 12.1.2007. Pursuant to this appointment, the petitioner did not report on duty. Thereafter, the petitioner made representation to claim that post. Pursuant to the order - 2 - dated 28.4.2009 passed by this Court, the representation of the petitioner was decided by an order dated 5.1.2009, wherein it is clearly mentioned that the appointment given to the petitioner stood cancelled since the petitioner did not report pursuant to the order of appointment. The view taken by the authority is reasonable and possible. The appointing authority was not expected to wait for the petitioner. We do not see any reason to interfere with the impugned order. The petition is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (A.V. Potdar,J.) (V.C. Daga, J.) ndk/c147094