0 ^^ I % 115.02.2006 Present: N one. +Nx.P. 112/02 Tn terms of order of the Joint Registrar dated 6th October, 2005. Court Notices were issued to the decree holders. Subsequently, in the order dated 16' January. 2006 it has been recorded by the Joint Regisirar that decree holders No. 123 and 5 have been served, but nobody was present and this case was listed before the Court. Even today none i s present on their behalf. Consequently, the Execution Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and default in appearance. February 15, 2006 S Y ff A N T E R^ ^ --R^ ^ -M J. rds . Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified %22-01-2007 Present: Mr. K.C. Dua for the DH/applicant. +EA No. 36/2007 in Ex. P. No. 112/2002 * On 15.2.2006, execution petition was dismissed in default. It is stated by the learned counsel for the decree holder that decree has not been fully satisfied. It would be open to the decree holder to ifie fresh execution petition. In view of this liberty granted to the decree holder, he does not press this application which is disposed of. h,yt TA±SIiäU) January 22, 2007 JUDGE JK. k1-1