IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.202 of 2009 JAI NARAIN JAISHWAL, S/O- LATE AYODHYA PRASAD, R/O- BARMASIA JAGARNATHPUR, P.S.- KATIHAR, DISTRICT- KATIHAR :-- PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH STATE TRANSPORT COMMISSION TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, BISHESHARIYA BHAWAN, PATNA, NAMELY, RAM SHABHIR PASWAN. 2. SRI V. JAISHANKAR, ADMINISTRATION, BIHAR STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION PARIWAHAN BHAWAN, PATNA. 3. SHRI BRAJ NANDAN SINGH, DIVISIONAL MANAGER, BIHAR STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, BANKIPORE DIVISION, SOUTH GANDHI MAIDAN, PATNA :--- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 8. 05.05.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. In compliance of the orders of this Court dated 1.7.2008 passed in C.W.J.C.No. 11877 of 2000 and 8480 of 2002, Annexure-1 the Administrator of the Bihar State Road Transport Corporation has passed order dated 7.4.2010 and in the light of the said order payments have already been made to the petitioner. Petitioner is, however, disputing the quantum of the payment released as according to him arrears of salary for the period after his suspension was revoked has not been paid. From perusal of the order dated 1.7.2008, Annexure-1 it, however, appears that this Court had only directed for payment of retiral dues including arrears of salary for the period of suspension and earlier thereto but not for payment of salary after revocation of suspension. In the circumstances, the prayer in this contempt application to direct the authorities to make payment of salary after revocation of suspension is wholly foreign to the direction issued. 3. In the circumstances, this contempt application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 7.4.2010. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)