IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN TUESDAY, THE 16TH JANUARY 2007 / 26TH PAUSHA 1928 WP(C).No. 1686 of 2007(A) ------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- A. SHERIF, AGED 49, S/O. ASANAR RAWTHER, CHEEPARA HOUSE, CHELAKKARA, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNA MENON SRI.M.JITHESH MENON RESPONDENTS: ---------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. 2. SRI. UDAYABHANU, ANUGRAHA, P.O. AMALA NAGAR, THRISSUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.A.FAYAZ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN, J. ``````````````````````````` W.P.(C) NO. 1686 OF 2007 ``````````````````````````` Dated this the 16th day of January, 2007 J U D G M E N T The second respondent has filed WP(c) No. 21347/06. This was disposed of by Exhibit P4. The petitioner therein was a grantee who was not however issued permit after settling the timings. It was directed that follow up action should be taken and appropriate orders be passed. The petitioner in the present writ petition has filed an unmarked exhibit which is treated as Exhibit P1. There is an objection raised against the proposed timings. Though there is an objection regarding the grant itself, such request cannot be directed to be considered by the authority as the petitioner has no legal right to challenge a grant. However, if he has got any objection regarding the proposed timings he is entitled to raise his objection in the timing conference and the timings will be settled as directed in Exhibit P4 with such an opportunity to the petitioner herein. Writ petition is disposed of as above. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE Rp WPC : 2 :