^:? ^sl '^ •;^ :L, .i..^ 'S E.-^ •isi^ ij a C 'pl'ffs^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUD8CATURE AT W. P. (S) No. ^§1^7 1 PETnTONER ....-^/ ^sy s^^ /''^y' Shri Fulchand Gadhe, aqed about 40 years, Working as ff' Assistant Teacher, s./' ^"^' •^' <• , Distt. - RESPONDENTS l.^Stateof c^ ^^ ^\V^ Mantralaya Raipur (C.6. ^ bistt. - Biaspur(C.fi. *ts-R-K^h^v ^~Ysw>^/ 3.- Assistant Korba (C.6.: x NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTCORARIOF The petitioner most humbly begs to submit as under:- HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILAS'UR W. P.(S) No. 995 of 2007 Petitioner Bhagwan Prasad 6adhe Versus Respondents ' ; State of Chhattisgarh <md o-thers SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Present: Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner, Ms. Oeepali Pcndey, P.L for •the respondents/State. OR DER (Passed on 21st &ay of February, 2007) 1. The petitioner was appomted vide order dated 6/10/1989 (P/l) as Assistant Teacher on fixed pay scale of Rs. 300/-. After comptetion of one year probation, he wss granted regutar pay soale of Rs. 975-1650. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the caae is asto whe-ther, the petitioner is entitled to regular poy scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. 3. The issue involved, herein wos considered by the Madhya Prade^i State Administrative Tribunat, Jcdbaipur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & others), wherem it was hetd that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scaie w.e.f. the date of initiat oppointment. The nwtter was 1uken-up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Specul Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholdin9 -the -y- decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistont Teachers are entitled to regular pay scate from date of initial cppointment. 4. Learned counsel oppearing for the petitioner further aibmits that this Court, white considering the same issue in Sudiil Tiwari & others Vs. State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & others (W.P. (5) No. 5976 of 2006) by order datesd 7-11-2006, has granted regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initfcil o()pointment. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that this cose is squarely covered by the ctecision of this Court in the case of Sudiil Tiwari & others Vs. State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & others (&ipra). Yo9esh 6. In view of that this petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.A8"«lom Judge