N’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH A ILASPUR CHHATT WRIT PErITIOS fM) N_> o. 0% /201o‘ Al Tan o Shi m Kumar lw ‘ son f r EIION ) Trouh I tem oalfields t‘ Seep s Ld at > IN THE HO T B f ' ‘ ‘ ’PT‘TER' ; ‘ >B hg ts ‘ ‘ _ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR \ (Hon Mr Justice Prltlnker Dlwaker) Wrlt Petltlon (S) No 5008 of 2010 PETITIONER Anil Kumar Tiwari ‘ VERSUS % { ‘ RESPONDENTS Coal India Ltd. and dthers Shrl C J K Rao counsel for the petitioner ‘0; Shn Pravm Das Advocate takes notice on behalf respondents WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOFINDIA At the outset counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitt to Withdraw this petition With liberty to make representatlon In terms of ord dated 29 4 2010 passed by thls Court In Wnt Appeal No 139/2008 (Annexu P2) He also prays for a dlrectlon to the respondents to deCIde t . representation made by the petltloner In accordance With law. CoUnsel for the respondents submits that prlma facie the petitioner h no right for the claim as made by him in the instant petition but representation made by the petitioner would be decided by the competen authority in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition “is dismissed as withdraWn with liberty a aforesaid. lf the petitioner makes a representation detailing his grievances, th e is expected to be decided by the competent authority in accordance'wit l lt is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion onr merits of the case and the competent authority would be free in decidingi representation of the petitioner o‘n its own merits. ORDER (03.09.2010) ‘ a th t: s" ew? r hi‘ aw as early as possible - s th t Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge ‘ ed V ett I r h