IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.21373 of 2010 Date of Decision : December 01, 2010. Shymali .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.P.P.S.Tung, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Vide order dated 24.4.2009 passed by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.6166 of 2009 (Annexure P-4), the claim of the petitioner for restoration of the electricity connection has already been disposed of in the light of the order dated 10.4.2009 passed by this Court in the case of Sukhjinder Singh versus State of Punjab and others. In this second petition, the petitioner is mainly aggrieved of non-compliance of the order dated 24.4.2009 earlier passed by this Court, by the respondents. If that is so, the petitioner can initiate appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the said order. Suffice it to observe that the petitioner cannot seek a C.W.P.No .21373 of 2010 2 mandamus for enforcement of an order already passed by this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction. With the liberty afore-mentioned, the writ petition is disposed of. Dasti. December 01, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE