IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-31662 of 2008 Date of Decision: December 02, 2008 Sardool Singh … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND Present : Mr. D.N. Ganeriwala, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** S.D. Anand, J (Oral) The learned counsel for the petitioner states that he would be content and interests of justice would be served if the respondents are directed to pass an order in accord with the directions issued by this Court in Crl. Misc. No. M-2223 of 2008 – Gurdial Ram vs. State of Punjab and others, decided on 25.08.2008 (Annexure P/1). Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. S.S. Mor, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Crl. Misc. No. M-31662 of 2008 The learned State counsel states that Annexure P/1 has not been challenged till date. On consensual basis, it is directed that the Competent Authority shall pass an order on the plea of the petitioner – prisoner in accord with the orders passed by this Court in Gurdial Ram’s case (supra). The exercise shall be concluded within two months from today. It will be for the State counsel to communicate the order to the Competent Authority. Copy of the order be given to the learned State counsel under the signatures of the Court Secretary. December 02, 2008 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2