1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 7221/2010 Ramesh Chandel Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 16.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr RS Tanwar - for the petitioner Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Petitioner has moved an application for correction in the FIR number as 224/2009 instead of 224/2008 in the cause title as well as for taking on record copy thereof. Learned counsel submits that due to inadvertence copy of another FIR was filed initially. In view of aforesaid, application is allowed. FIR No.224/2009 is taken on record so also the copy thereof. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 2 petitioner has been falsely implicated for the offence under section 411 IPC. He will not commit same or similar offence during the period of bail or otherwise, if granted. Looking to the aforesaid, petitioner may be granted bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and it is directed that accused-petitioner namely; Ramesh Chandel may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 224/2009 registered at Police Station – Shyam Nagar, Jaipur for offence under Section/s 392 and 411 IPC provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 3 It is, however, made clear that if the petitioners are found committing same or similar offence or any other type of offence during the period of bail then not only the prosecution would be at liberty to seek cancellation of this bail order but the Investigating Officer is also directed to inform about the same to this court if any case is registered. Copy of this order may be sent to the Investigating Officer concerned for necessary information and compliance if so required. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma