1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.09.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.JYOTHIMANI AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.P.(MD).No.9969 of 2011 N.Manimaruthu : Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Madurai District. 2.The Senior Regional Manager, TASMAC Limited, Anna Nagar, Near TNHB Community Hall, Madurai 20. 3.The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC), Madurai, Madurai District. 4.The Assistant Commissioner (Excise), Madurai District Collector Office, Madurai District. : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the representation preferred by the petitioner dated 23.08.2011 in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Alagumani For Respondent 1 : Mr.K.Mahendran Special Government Pleader For Respondents 2 to 4 : Mr.M.Muniyaswamy Standing Counsel O R D E R [Order of the Court was made BY M.M.SUNDRESH, J] Mr.K.Mahendran, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the first respondent. Mr.M.Muniyaswamy, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice on behalf of respondents 2 to 4. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. It is seen from the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition that this Court has already passed an order on 18.08.2011 in W.P.(MD). No.9277 of 2011 filed by one Mr.R.Ramamurthy, directing the first respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner therein dated 11.08.2011 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order and it was made clear in the said order that till such fill orders are passed by the first respondent, status-quo as-on-date shall be maintained regarding shifting of TASMAC Shop. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3. The petitioner has come forward to file the present Writ Petition alleging that he has been given license by the third respondent, and therefore, he has also given a representation on 23.08.2011 to the first respondent after coming to know about the representation dated 11.08.2011 given by the petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.9277 of 2011. 4. Considering the fact that the petitioner has already given a representation on the very same issue and the third respondent has already granted license in favour of him, we are of the view that the first respondent herein will have to be directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 23.08.2011 along with the representation given by the petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.9277 of 2011. 5. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Writ Petition stands disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 23.08.2011 along with the representation given by the petitioner, which is being considered by the first respondent as per the direction issued by this Court in W.P.(MD).No.9277 of 2011 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, if the same is not disposed of, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (Writs) /True copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Madurai District. 2.The Senior Regional Manager, TASMAC Limited, Anna Nagar, Near TNHB Community Hall, Madurai 20. 3.The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC), Madurai, Madurai District. 4.The Assistant Commissioner (Excise), Madurai District Collector Office, Madurai District. +1. CC to Mr.R.Alagumani, Advocate, SR.No. 29959 NB ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD).No.9969 of 2011 05.09.2011 TR : 13.09.2011: 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/