Crl. Rev. No. 1396 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Rev. No. 1396 of 2010 Date of Decision: July 26, 2010 Jaswant Singh …..Petitioner Vs. Ashok …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Vikram Punia, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Legality and propriety of the order summoning the petitioner as an accused and order of notice of accusation has been challenged inter-alia on the ground that no notice has been served upon the petitioner demanding the amount of alleged cheque and that no offence is made out on the basis of vague allegations in the complaint wherein it is admitted in para 7 that the cheque was re-submitted after it was first dishonoured. Crl. Rev. No. 1396 of 2010 [2] Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy of filing a revision petition before the Sessions Court. All the pleas taken up in this petition can be raised before the said Court. The certified copy of the summoning order and the order of notice of accusation placed on the record be returned to the counsel for the petitioner by the Registry on presentation of photocopies of the said orders to enable him to file a revision petition alongwith an application for condonation of delay in accordance with law. July 26, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE