{ wvm‘vrvMu/n»: uuuuu..u -vumlw'» VVVVV \\i§)\ a g3 T1 ‘ {33* mi??? 35/3 .Igs‘: g J":eaeaaiaeeea§aéa‘h ”El“ta« ‘Im m [mH ruw ”f4 II "Ef‘iii‘ e; agar}, ASEg-igimit V9hT v J ‘fxataaiv Eiatriat— aasfkizxg a:— E 1 §§3§iaig Eihaintexi; ?E§%§a e a? Qhixaiii5g§a€E ’iéwiimgéx i3 $g§i§uiéufg / 2‘ Li’ireiigf, ¥7ett3fii15§y HealtE‘x f“ arvituaa, Emp : Eisirici— 34!. (H: Eegmiy gwecma Veieriixary eakl" Eeya?ica3, Dhafxxtai‘i , %. AEEiataixt Veteyitxai‘y Cgic‘ri Kiettariixat? Haggital— Magi‘i Eji5ti‘iai: —— Bhan‘?a§i. / 5, i agatagit ifateyinaxy as; Veiai’iixai‘f: HQE"ita1 Damie- wa:a Diatg‘iat * DEmtari: ‘ l1":"m ml ! M t”?I “ l““'":I ' P‘ W‘" [u k |' m"u bi‘IQEEAEEE Eai -_: £EELE§EAE¥ I—‘EQE Fifi; grim ‘ EREIZEEQEE :— W m {m4mEw !Im‘ 13V i?“v5% . f VV i ‘\ : el- : -. t : I ”w W W 1m i XI-HC—78 EW,WI§,W W m “ . . . u ? “ n u u ( : § m . [Al ‘$$ 200g @ WW<W) { Wmarréwm mmwm ' $wf§mm§a ‘ 25-8-2006 \ Mr. Vishnu Koshta, counsel for the petitioner. Miss Deepaii Pandey, Parel Lawyer for the State/respondentsyon advance copy. Heard both the counsei. By the instant writ petition u ider Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged his tr fer order dated 30-6-2006 whereby he has been transferred from Dhamtari to antewada. Learned counsel for the peti ioner snbmits that the petitiener has already made a representation to responde t No.1, same is pending and it is not being decided. Therefore, learned couns i further submits that the petitioner may be ailowed tc make a detailed represe tation afresh to reseondent No.1 raising all his grievances and respondent No. be directed to decide the same, to which learned counsei appearing for the S ate/respondents has no objection. Having heard learnedxcouns i for the panies, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case an without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, the request made by iear’ ed counsel for the petitioner is just, fair and reasonable. Therefore, the peitioner is allowed to make a detailed . representation raising ail his grieva ces annexing a copy of the writ petition and its annexures to respondent No.1 ithin ten days from today and respondent No.1 is directed to decide the repr entation within one month from the date of its receipt after considering the po nts raised by the petitioner, in an objective manner, on its own merits, in accor ance with law, Some With the direction aforesaid, he petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P.No.2 03/2006 also stands disposed of. Parties are entitled for certif copy of this order. N Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge 1'.1.U. m7 My Warm ammonia a s i d