hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO. 5917 OF 2009 Hanumant Somanath Shiketod ... Petitioner Versus Barshi Shikshan Prasarak Mandal ... Respondent Mr. I. M. Khairdi for the Petitioner. Mr. Suresh S. Shah for R. Nos. 1 and 2. Mr.S.N. Patil, A.G.P. For R. Nos. 3 to 5. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 09, 2009 P.C. The Petitioner has approached this court contending that though he had obtained teaching qualifications for Assistant Teacher and was eligible as on 5.6.2002, has not been given full time post of Assistant Teacher. The Petitioner relies upon the G.R. and Para 9 thereof. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. It appears that the translation given to us is not in terms of the G.R. For the teacher to be eligible to be appointed on full time basis, there must be sufficient workload. In the instant case, the Respondent department has filed an affidavit in which it is pointed out that the Petitioner was appointed as Teacher for Hindi subject and there is no workload for the said subject. Once that be the case, the relief sought for by the Petitioner, in our opinion, cannot be granted. It is only in the event there was sufficient workload in Hindi for which Petitioner was appointed and other requirements are met, then the Petitioner would be eligible to be appointed on regular basis. In the instant case, that qualification is not met and hence, there is no merit in the Petition which is accordingly dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA, J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)