IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17116 of 2009 PRASHANT KUMAR & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 03.02.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. This Court is not persuaded to start a roving enquiry into the appointment at the behest of the petitioners. There are no details of the marks obtained by the petitioners or that a person with lesser marks has been appointed. There is no allegation of any person lower in the merit panel having been appointed ignoring the candidature of the petitioners. This Court declines to interfere at the behest of the petitioners on such vague pleadings. If the petitioners file a representation making full and complete disclosure of arbitrariness alleged on the part of the respondents as mentioned above only in that event are the respondents required to consider their representation and not otherwise. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)