IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2008 / 21ST JYAISHTA 1930 CRP.No. 2121 of 2002() ---------------------- OA.3335/1975 of LAND TRIBUNAL, TIRUR AA.206/2000 of A.A.(LR),THRISSUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER/APPELLANT/PETITIONER: ------------------ PUTHIYAKATH KANNACHAMVEETTIL, P.K.ABDULLA MUSALIAR, PACHATTIRI AMSOM AND DESOM, P.O. PACHATTIRI BY ADV. SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI (SR.) RESPONDENTS: ------------- PADANATTIL RUGMINI AMMA, D/O. LAKSHMIKUTTY AMMA, P.O. TRIKKANDIYOOR, THIROOR BY ADV. SRI.S.RAMESH BABU THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. -------------------------------------------- C.R.P. NO. 2121 OF 2002 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of June, 2008 O R D E R The applicant in O.A. No.3335 of 1975 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirur is the revision petitioner. His application for assignment of jenm right in respect of the property scheduled in the application was dismissed by the Land Tribunal. The Land Tribunal had taken note of the fact that the Supreme Court had decided the dispute between the parties by order dated 17.1.1996 in Civil Appeal No.93 of 1995. The Supreme Court held that the applicant is not a tenant entitled to fixity of tenure. In the circumstances, the Land Tribunal rightly held that the applicant is not entitled for assignment of the property as prayed for. This order was confirmed by the Appellate Authority(LR), Thrissur in A.A. No.206 of 2000. The applicant has filed this revision challenging the order passed by the Appellate Authority. 2. The records show that the dispute between the parties has become final in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court C.R.P. NO.2121/2002 2 finally decided the rights of the parties and held that the applicant has no right for getting assignment of the property in question. In the circumstances, nothing survives in this revision. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. (HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE) sp/ C.R.P. NO.2121/2002 3 HAURN-UL-RASHID, J. C.R.P. NO. 2121/2002 O R D E R 11th June, 2008