Xi—HC-22 3am, Wm,W Ly M f I G 200 ,, W mam WW mw mmmw WW‘§WW kwm 17082006 Shri Ganesh Pr'qjapafi, counsel for fhe pe‘rifianer. Shri VVS Mur'fhy, Addi‘l‘iunal Public Prosecufor' wifh Shri Sudhir CE Bajpai, Dy 6A for The S‘ta‘fe. Heard. This pefi‘rion under Secfim 482 of The Code of Criminal Procedure § (heneeforfh "+he Code") has been filed by ’rhe pefi‘rioner‘ To quash fhe Firs? Informa‘l‘fon Repor‘r da‘fed 17.05.20305 of Crime No.119/2005. Facfual mufr'ix of fhe case n brief is fhaf on 16.02.2005, a sale deed A was execu'red it} favour of 5 T Jankibai. Johanibai and Ambabai impersona‘iing as Anjanibai and K ni'ibai have execui'ed fhe sale deed and pe’rifioner was ’rhe person who af‘r s‘red if as a wi‘rness. Anjanibai when came 1'o know The said facT made a wriT en complainT To police. The complainT was enquired by Head ConsTable Mo anlal, who on enquiry found ThaT land L‘ bearing Khasra No.853/2 admeasu ing 0.43 hecTare owned by Anjanibai and KunTibai has been sold by Johanib i and Ambabai personaTing Themselves To be AnJ‘anibai and KunTibai To J‘onkibai vide regisTered sale deed claTed 16.02.2005 and To faciliTaTe The execuTion and regisTraTion, peTiTioner who is village Sarpanch knowingly’wiTne ssed and signed The documenT as one of The wiTness, Therefore, a case under SecTions 420, 467, 468, 419 & 471 has been regisTered. AllegaTions againsT The peTiTioner are ThaT he is a Sarpanoh who knowingly wiTnessed The forged T~ansacTion and signed The documenT i.e. salendeed as wiTness. The offence‘of fwrta‘nd cheaTing ThaT Too by Xi—HC—22 3a W, Wang, W 3mm mmCfmflC/G. Hi 200 m WW mmatw - WW§WW WW %3T%mm conspiracy is evidenf and pefi‘rioner who facili‘lrafed The forgery cannof escape himseh‘ from if. In View of fhe above, FIR dafed 17.05.2005 lodged againsf the pefifioner does not deserve +0 be quashed. TherAefore, fheigiEt/ion is dismissed inlimine. Sd/l- ~<u f V.K.Shrivastava ‘padma L Judge (@W) 66 \‘