IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1931 RP.No. 1111 of 2009(N) -------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.5174/2009 DATED 03/03/2009 .................... PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 ------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED,"BHADRATHA",P.B.NO.510,MUSEUM ROAD, THRISSUR-680 020. 2. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED, CORPORATE OFFICE, BHADRATHA,THRISSUR. BY ADV. MR.E.K.NANDAKUMAR MR.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR MR.K.JOHN MATHAI MR.P.BENNY THOMAS RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER AND IST RESPONDENT --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. JAFEEK KHAN. M, S/O.MOHAMMED SALIH RAWTHER JAFEEK BHAVAN, CHUNAKARA SOUTH, CHARUMOOD.PO, ALAPPUZHA. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL & ADMINSITRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 BY ADV. MR.S. SUBASH CHAND. R2 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.MUHAMOOD T.T. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs. T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.No.1111/2009 in W.P.(C) No.5174 of 2009-N - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 24th day of November, 2009. O R D E R Respondents 2 and 3 in the writ petition are the petitioners in this review petition. The writ petition was filed by the first respondent herein aggrieved by the rejection of the claim for appointment under the compassionate employment scheme by the petitioners herein, as per Ext.P6. This Court took the view that in the light of the decision of a learned Single Judge of this Court in Ashkarali v. State of Kerala (2009 (1) KLT SN 17), the view taken in Ext.P6 cannot be accepted as a correct one. Accordingly, a direction was issued to consider the application in accordance with the scheme. Finally, respondents 2 and 3, viz. the petitioners herein were directed to pass appropriate orders within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. 2. In this review petition, it is pointed out that the proposal of the appointment will have to be sanctioned by the Government and therefore the operative portion of the judgment may be modified, directing the second respondent herein, viz. the Government to consider the proposal and pass appropriate orders for enabling the petitioners herein to issue the formal RP 1111/2009 2 order. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner has produced along with I.A. No. 625/2009 the recommendation forwarded by the petitioners in the review petition, to the Government in favour of the writ petitioner, after finding that he satisfies all the conditions of the Scheme. 3. Therefore, it is clarified that the second respondent Government will take a decision on the recommendation forwarded by the petitioners herein for giving appropriate sanction to them for appointment of the writ petitioner under the compassionate employment scheme. Appropriate orders will be passed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The review petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/