WP(C) 4864/2008 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. S. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. R . Chokraborty, learned Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate. I have also heard Ms. Hoda, lea rned CGSC. The petitioner who was earlier declared to be a foreigner by the Foreigners’ Tri bunal, Sonitur, Tezpur in FT Case No. 44/07 has now been found to be an Indian c itizen by the same very Tribunal as recorded in its order dated 23.07.09. The case against the petitioner was initiated as per the IMDT Act, but after scr apping of the Act by the Supreme Court, the case was reregistered against the pe titioner as FT Case No. 44/07 vide order dated 26.07.07. The order was set aside by this Court on account of on-receipt of notice from the Tribunal by the petit ioner. The order was so passed on 05.01.09 directing the Tribunal to redetermine the issue upon hearing the petitioner. After the aforesaid order, the petitioner appeared before the Tribunal and produ ced the evidence in support of his claim of Indian citizenship. On the basis of the evidence adduced and upon hearing the parties, the Tribunal has redetermined the issue by order dated 23.07.09 holding that the petitioner is not a foreigne r. I have gone through the entire case records and the evidence adduced by the peti tioner and on close scrutiny of the same, I do not find any infirmity in the ord er dated 23.07.09. In view of the above, the order dated 23.07.09 passed by the Foreigners’ Tribuna l (2nd), Sonitpur, Tezpur in FT Case No. 44/07 has been upheld and the writ peti tion is disposed of in terms of the said order. Registry shall send down the LCR immediately.