IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 11082 of 1999 Between: M Laxmaiah, E.404951, S/o Ramaiah R/o Guntuvari Thota, 7th lane, D.No. 13-8-110, Guntur Distri ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The A.P.S.R.T.C., rep by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad 2 The Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Guntur Region, Guntur District 3 The Depot Manager A.P.S.R.T.C., Tenali Depot, Tenali, Guntur District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent herein in issuing the suspension order vide proc. No. 03/114(7)/99-TNL, Tenali dt. 24/3/99 as illegal arbitary and as such set aside the same in the interest of justice with a consequential direction to the 3rd respondent herein to treat the period of suspension was on duty with all benefits and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.M.SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: MR.C.PRAKASH REDDY The Court made the following Order: Questioning the order of suspension dated 24-03-1999, the present writ petition is filed. In the counter affidavit filed, respondents themselves stated that the impugned order of suspension was lifted on 01-07-1999 itself. Both Sri S.M.Subhan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.Prakash Reddy, learned standing counsel for the respondent- Corporation, would agree that in view of the orders passed on 01-07- 1999 lifting the suspension, the cause in the writ petition does not necessitate adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _______________ 29-02-2008 usd