IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 14TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 23RD BHADRA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 988 of 2009(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.28604/2008 Dated 29/12/2008 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN OP ------------------------------- K.PONNAMMA,AGED 42 YEARS, W/O. JOHN THOMAS, PART-TIME SWEEPER, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER,BUIDGES SECTION, KOTTARAKKARA, RESIDING AT: MANIANAKUNNIL VEEDU, NEDUMBAYIKULAM, KUNDARA P.O.,KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN O.P: --------------- 1. SRI,TOM JOSE, IAS, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER WORKING AS THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SURESH KOILERIAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER WORKING AS CHIEF ENGINEER, AWD ADMINISTRATION THIRUVANANTHAPRUAM. 3. THOMAS MATHEW, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER WORKING AS THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD ROADS, DIVISION, KOLLAM. 4. SMT.SREEKALA, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER WORKING AS ASST.ENGINEER, PWD BRIDGES SECTION, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- Cont. Case (C) No. 988 OF 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of September, 2009 J U D G M E N T Sri. P.Narayanan, the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits on instructions that the Government have by G.O.(Ms)54/2009/PWD dated 21.8.2009 accorded sanction for the creation of a post of Part-time Sweeper in the PWD Bridges Section, Kottarakkara with effect from 29.9.2005 and to regularise the petitioner in service against that post with effect from 29.9.2005. A copy of the Government order dated 21.8.2009 was also made available to me for perusal. I have gone through the same. In my opinion in view of the decision taken by the Government, the petitioner cannot have any subsisting grievance. The Government have, by issuing the order dated 21.8.2009, complied with the direction issued by this Court. In that view of the matter, no orders are called for in this Contempt Case. It is accordingly closed. P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE vps