1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3514 OF 2011 M/s.Mundra Port & Special Economic Zone Ltd.& Anr. .. Petitioners V/s Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Janak Dwarkadas, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Vikram Nankani, Mr.Navesh Thackar and Mr.Monish Ponda i/by Mr.M.R.Baya for the petitioners. Ms.S.I.Shah i/by S.I.Shah & Co.for Respondent No.1. Mr.D.J.Khambata, Additional Solicitor General for Respondent No.2. Mr.Rajeev Kumar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.R.S.Bidkar and Mr.Karan Adwani i/by M/s.Adwani & Co.for Respondent No.3. Mr.H.W.Kane i/by M/s.Motiwala & Co.for Respondent No.4. Mr.Rahul Narichania with Mr.K.V.Sen i/by Verus Advocate for Respondent No.5. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE: 14th July, 2011. P.C.: 1. On the motion made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, petition is permitted to be withdrawn. Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 2. Learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for Respondent No.2 states that in case the petitioners make representation to Respondent No.2 within three weeks from today, making a grievance against non-grant of security clearance to the 2 petitioners alongwith any document on which the petitioners may be relying to claim that they are entitled to grant of security clearance, that representation would be considered by Respondent No.2 after getting opinion of the Home Ministry and of any other concerned Ministry on that representation and the decision will be communicated to the petitioners. The statement is accepted. 3. Learned Additional Solicitor General makes it clear that in the process of consideration of representation, Respondent No.2 is not obliged to grant any personal hearing to the petitioners and it is not compulsory for Respondent No.2 to give any reasons for the decision that it may take on the representation. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)