C.R. No.1242 of 1998 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.1242 of 1998 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.09.2009 Punjab State and another .....Petitioners Versus Sh. Rohini Kumar ....Respondent Present: Ms. Monica Chhibbar Sharma, DAG, Punjab for the petitioner. Ms. Naina Goyal, Advocate for Mr. B.R. Mahajan, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The revision is against the order dated 14.02.1998 against the order of the Executing Court directing further process in execution obtained by the decree-holder. The Executing Court had recorded the fact that the decree had not been fully complied with and that the property of the judgment debtor could be put to sale. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the State that the connected civil revisions in C.R. No.2349 of 1997 and C.R. No.5767 of 1998 have already been disposed of, taking note of the fact that the State had subsequently deposited the amount due under the decree. The civil revision shall require to be dismissed for the same reason as had been found in the above two civil revisions. 2. In view of the subsequent event of the deposit of the money, C.R. No.1242 of 1998 (O&M) -2- no further intervention is necessary and the civil revision is dismissed as such. There shall be, however, no direction as to costs. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 01, 2009 Pankaj*