C.R. No. 681 of 2009 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 681 of 2009 Date of Decision: August 25, 2009 Rachhpal Singh and others …..Petitioners Vs. M/s Subhash Chander Yogesh Kumar …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Ms. Ravinder K. Manaise, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Nitin Thatai, Advocate for the respondent. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Vide impugned order, while staying the proceedings under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC, the trial Court has directed the petitioners to deposit a sum of Rs.1 lac to secure the interest of the decree holder in a case where the decree-holder has obtained a decree for Rs.1,69,423/- with interest against Rachhpal Singh and Jameet Singh who are the predecessor-in- interest of petitioners No.2 to 5. In a similar petition, to secure a decree of C.R. No. 681 of 2009 [2] Rs.3,64,716/-, an order has been passed for deposit of Rs.1 lac while staying the proceedings under Order 9 Rue 13 CPC. The present case also deserves to be dismissed in the light of the view taken in Civil Revision No. 645 of 2009 but the order of deposit of Rs.1 lac in both the cases seems to be not appropriate as the yardstick adopted for securing the rights of decree holder has to be different depending upon the decree. In the interest of justice, while dismissing this revision petition the impugned order is modified to the extent that instead of depositing a sum of Rs.1 lac, a sum of Rs.50000/- will be deposited, as a condition for staying the further execution proceedings during the pendency of petition under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. Disposed of in the aforesaid terms. August 25, 2009 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE