; l^::l'J&s%i'i^^ ®THEmGHCQUR®^QFCHHATTISGAmi^ '•LCR;iM.;pJ&.^;'%^l'/,:2Qlii;'^:': :'::;^ ACQUITTAt^EEALJ^O. :7.201.1 AKPLIG&NT/: AFPEfcLANT ^ESEONDENT AGCBISED1- ..? KSfate^df:iCHb.attisgarH.,^ :'.' •' •.^, ?"TKroughVthe^P.S;^Gity^Kotwali, ?Raiga;FhE>istnctRaigarK(e;G.) .3^RSIJS •••'...:: -..'•:.?^'^..':.,,. ^'RiKKirani^:^'' •;';:5.'.::'^:::^ ^.'.^^'^ ^S^&?[tinara3±L'Yadax,^^ ^ ^Age(i^abouf;-Ql'years,''^, . . tlf@s,t^.^^"--^II%.D^gardi^^ ^*^;w^''^^''''^^ "' ;:.I^^^District.RaigaTh,^fCG.).:;•;; ,;,/.::J,^ IA^UCATI01S'I^R:GRANT.QF.I^^ ;SECTION 378(3) ANK3MEMORANDUW:OF'APPEALUNDER SECTION 378(^OFTHE?GODE QiF GRIMINAL PRCIGEDURE. ,1973 • .' ,;;:: --- : : ,•,.-:.-••.^^^ :.. - • m^ 'fy sii^w^ R'ti* wff-sn^r iE^Nf ,.<;-• >- ffWW thNKh ^TSt ^i<ii(n<.i, yTily'is, fai*iiy^< _.A.ff.f...2iz/'.;.. sn^i 'vs^: ('^5^*1) WITIR ^lfcl 311^1 S.B. Hon'bte Shri Justice Prafehant Kumar Mishra 01.12.2B11 Gc* rrim pijove Shri Sandeep Yadav, Dy. Go'jt. Heard on I.A. No.1 for takirfc rectirication ofdetault No.1. On due consideration. bothtlle Also heard on l.A. No. 2 for seeking leave to appeal. inougri, tne learned criiet j spite of order Tor issuance of sur number of times, however.it is also! teen granted to tne prosecution to This appllcation seeKing accusea was rouna to be in Exptanation seeking condonation of judgment on 13/10/2009 the sanctior) ' in-criarge was appointed wtio cont^ctea 11/11/2011.. There is no exotanation mubh between the period 29/01/2010 to 11) In view of the above, ttiis coiirt or explanatlon shown for seeking tor leave to appeal. Accordingtv. i.A. No.2 for consequently Cr.M.P. is also dismisstd— aDplications are allowed. cjandonation ofdetay in fillng triearollcation lea\(e possesqion <<>l<lid4-f MWcfl'? 1^3) ^r°l*<;l( ^sifwa.a^i Aciyocate for the State/app'icanfc document on record and I.A. No. 3 for CTW^'«i*'>:spm«»,''sI:rtyTW—FS/l-'«—!.".:011—1,50,000. ludicial Maglstrate has mentioned tnat in ions the same could not be issued on Imentioned tftat several oooortunities have itscase. to appeal is barred by 537 days. The ot tnree bottles ot country made liquor. Uelav is that after passina of the impugned 1 was granted on 29/01/2010 and the officer the oftice ot Advocate Ueneral on less explanation 6f day-to-day's delay ;hicoii. ;0(^rt is not satisfled with tne reason assigned c^ndonation of delay in ffling ftie application fcondonatton of delav is dismissed and Sd/- prashantKumarMishra Judge