PETTHCWER tN TMt Mtetp^&UKT 01- JUOtfcftnJKfeAt- Htt-AiyUK(fcHMAT-t-t>?t3AKHl WRrr FCTmniM NOs4;T^ /z< Gyanesh Sharma, S/o. tde P.S. Shanna, agQilabout4lyears, R/o. A}ad Chowk, Brahmanpaia, Raipur (C.G.) VERSIK RESPONDENTS \^ Y^ ^^•^' ^y ^•^y ^ ^y^' <^-^ The StatBEled]onCommtsston,Chhattjsgarh Near D.K.S Bhawan Raipur. TheRetiimmgOfflcerftirMunidpali 0eGtion,Raipur,TheColtectotatEOffice, R3Jpur(e.G.) The^tateofChhat&garh/Through Secrefary GA.D. Department, D.K.S. Bhawao Raipur (C.G.) PETmONUNDERARnCLE2268tZ2^0FTHECONSTTRjnONOI= INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APTOOTOIKTE WRTFS. MRECTTONS 'S^ "qi^Kt^,:,0fl1'M'i1<o:, 'fsKiiray,'!. ' . .•'•o3.(f>,M?.:^.;lV;.l^ c- 06.122004 •WRfePftTilITOf'? ^•SififEI Shri S.C.Ver'ma.coun^lfor Shri Pr-atnod Kumar Ver'n'ja,. Additional Advocate Seneral for respondentsNo.l<& 2. Shri basurath (Supta, &^vemment Advocate for respondent No.S/S-hrte. Heard on I.A.No.9360/2QC|4 for exempting The petitiorier from filing typed cppy of the sliglTtly which counsei for respondehts hav^ no bbjection. Considered. I.A. allowed. Also hfidrd on admission <m<l the post of Corporcrtor from waFd 2004 the Retur'nirig Officet' Rajpui has been allotted "1-1ut" ^IAggitet filed thispstition with a request+4 of any symbol to a candidate |rtie.petitiQner. faitTted/handwriften'documents.for ^.CW.)P.No.4999/2Cl04. PetitioneF is contesting^ AU411CIPN ^^01^0" el^lon^^^^ No.58 Brahmanpara. Qri 2" &e<»mber KflUottBtil him a symbol^ or "Nav" (boat) for thiis electidh. ^fewB^ue^it^ Officer changed the symbot and i^i |?lace of Nttv" (bpaf), ^hs ps'l'i*io"sr •ed with this allotmen't petitionei' has .stay -Fhe eslection. e^ottisgcs^^og^P^^^ivad^^^^^^ of rule 3F specifically provides th|at -the allotment by ReTurning Officer shqll be final except -wbere it is Gi: PKI—FS/350—12/2000—50.000. I \ 'S^I ^W.W^, 'S^FTS'^-'tiRTRT^ :,;:^P:: fo:o^^^ 1Y^^ (;, \.- R -•'^- * •thdt letter inconsistent writh cu'iy direction ^is:; behalf, 'm which case the Electj in such mimner as it deems fii petitioner himself, it is clear petitioner, -Hie fteturning OffiCe.r correct tfie same, -he sought Commission, who vide Their Returning Officer t° chan9e the been made. If is auTddmitted positiqn was allotted to the petitionep eai^ Therefore, sub^quently, in pface] the Returnin9 Gfficer does not c^ substantidl loss has been caused on publicity after obtaining the Petitioner has relied on others reoorted in 2004 AIR distinguishoble on the facts of th^ The petition filed by -rtie summarilyoind isaccondinglydistni^ |ued by the Electibn Cpminission in this Commissipn rnay reyte 1+ie allfitnient From the ciQcumenf filed by the in allotmerit of "Nav" (boat) t6 the lcoinmittBd some error. Therefore, to bermission from the Stdte Election dated 04.12.2004 permirtedThe ^ymbol and accorclin9ly, the chan9e has •i'Wld^l-) Wf^ ^ fS<S> 'd^H^R (riiat the symbol of "Nav''(boat), which ^lier, hflfi not been dltoitted to any one. of boat the allotmentof hut made by ill for interference on the ground that to the petitioner' who has spent money syjnbol boat. t>b» R<u Vs Stafe of AAaharashtra & SCW 213. But this coise taw is presentcase. petitipner' deserves to be dismissed sed. q; PRJ—FS/350—12/2000—50,000. l^ XI-HC—78 Niicn »^trai 3^'<''il':il<YiAl, 0T^'y'l<o,ftdf'91^(. '.. .'^ p^^^ ^ "-•"'ffyzoo 3II^fI'qg^:(' SfI^I W [^•ijtti prsn' SFI^T sft^icft '^ padma ^•niw^ifsg •s<i^<i ^^, Conaequently, M:(W.)P.No. I.A.No9359/2004 for urgent heai^ing tbifl[<n<tl^ TTR?isf ^ftst^ •<f^f^)^ i;3ifin3T^?[ ; ; '" 4999/2004 for Ad-in-terim reKef and sfand dispoSed of. Sd//- V.K.Shrivastava ^ Judge .•!<