HIGH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH AT BILASPUR Aopellant Resoondents Claimants Driver Owner Sinale Bench : Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh. J. M.A.(CLNo.755/2008 The New india Assurance Company Limited, through - Divisional Manager, the New India Assurance Company Limited, Bilaspur, 2"d Floor, Rama trade Centre, Opposite - Rajeev Plaza, Bus Stand, Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus 1. Dhirendra Singh Bwel, S/o Late Panchraj Singh, aged 35 years, 2. Smt Anjana Singh Bwel, W/o Shri Dhirendra Singh Bwel, aged 33 years, Both R/o P.T.S. Borgaon, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh) at present S.A.F. Jagdalpur, District Bastar (Chhathsgarh) 3. Ajay Kumar Dhuppad, S/o Jaypal Dhuppad, Kanker Roadways, Civil Line, Raipur (Chhattjsgarh) 4. M/S Kanker Roadways, Civil Lino, Rai'pur (Chhattisgarh) APPEAL UNDER SECT10N 173 OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT. 1988 Present: Shri Sourabh Sharma, counsel for the appellant ORAL ORDER (Passed on 01.08.2008) Heard on admission. 2. This appeal is against the award dated 12.03.2008 passed in Claim case No. 172/2007 by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Bastar at Jagdalpur vide order dated 12tn March, 2008 awarding compensation of Rs.2,02,000/- in case ofxleath of a girl child aged 11 years. 3. In view of the decisions rendered by this Court in Misc. Appeal (C) No. 141/2C%)6 passed on 4.7.2008 (The New India Assurance Company Umfted v. Mohamad Hassan Khan and others) and Misc. Appeal (C) No. 268/2007 passed on 7.7.2008 (Unfted Indla Insurance Co. Ud. v. Tiharu and othei^), compensation awarded by the Tribunal cannot be faulted with. 4. There is no merit jn thjs appeal whjch is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. 5. Before parting with this appeal, it is noticed that order dated 04.03.2008 passed by the Tribunal under Section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is nota speaking order. The Tribunal was required to give reasons for satisfying itself whether there is collusion between the person making the claim and the person against whom the claim is made or a person against whom the claim is made has fajled to contest the claim. In this regard specific directions were issued by this Court on 28.02.2007 in M.A.(C).No.258/2007. It is disheartening to note that the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals in the State are not complying with the directions contained in the said order passed by this Court. The Additional Registrar (Judicial) is directed to extract a copy of paragraph 5 of this order and to send it with a copy of the order passed by this Court in M.A.(C)258/2007 on 28.02.2007 to all the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals in the State for rigidly adhering to the directions contained in the said order. Acknowledgment about having receivecl the copy of order dated 28.02.2007 be called from each Tribunal and a report be submitted within a fortnight. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge