”/3 1 7g/ 7‘ g§e ench ( % i V BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH 5 AT BILASPUR 'W.P. (S) No. “go-1‘ [2009 Suahanshu §Diwan, S/o Shri Ram Nihal, Aged abou:t 52 years, Working as Assistant Professor (Department Of Sociology), i in Government College Bagbahara, District —-Mahasamund, R/o H.N0 19/91, Near Canal, Club Para, y Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (00f Petitioner Versus 1 /State of Chhattisgarh, through Th . e Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) / The Director, Directorate of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. /The Principal, Government College Bagbahara, District Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIseAkI-I AT BILASPUR l t Single Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker Writ Petition (S) No. 430 of 2009 EETITIONER Sudhanshu Diwan Versus 1 K i VI i RESPONDENTS State of Chjhattisgarh & others. § E Mr. Manish Shanna, counsel for the petitioner Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Advacjate General for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226'OF THE CONSTITUTION OF. INDIA: O R D E R i (1 2.08.2009) With the consent of the parties the matter is heard finally Grievance of the petitioner In this petition is that despite the order passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in the identical matters being W.P. No.4863/2001 and W.P. No.2620/2006 (S) (Annexure P-9) the petitioner has not been granted the selection grade and senior pay scale. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction may be issued to the respondents/authorities that if the petitioner makes a representation detailing his grievances therein, the same shall be decided expeditiOusly. To this submission of the counsel for the petitioner, counsel for the respondents/State / has no objection Accordingly, the petition Is disposed of With a direction to . he authorities concerned and vin case the petitioner makes a‘ representation within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt ofrcopy of this order, the same shall be decided within a further periodof two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same shall be decided within a further period/of two months from the date of its receipt in the light of the aforementioned decisions of the HighCourt of Madhya Pradesh. i Sdl- Pritinker Diwaker Judge § P t