In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CR No. 251 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on January 31,2011. Gian Parkash --Petitioner vs. M/s.Brij Lal Tilak Raj and others --Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Naveen Mahajan,Advocate, for the petitioner Rakesh Kumar Jain, J, (Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 14.12.2010, passed by the learned Rent Controller, Moga, by which an application filed by the petitioner/tenant for leading additional evidence by way of judgment and decree dated 20.1.2010 and also by proving income tax return, has been declined. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he does not press his prayer with regard to the proof of income tax return filed by the respondent/petitioner. All that has been argued is with regard to the leading of additional evidence of the certified copies of judgment and decree of the Civil Court dated CR No.251 of 2011 (O&M) -2- 20.1.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner is candid enough to admit that there is no averment made in respect of the partial ejectment in the reply, therefore, to my mind, the document which is sought to be produced by way of additional evidence is without any consequence because in the absence of any pleadings, any evidence led by the parties cannot be read. Hence, I do not find any error in the order passed by the learned Rent Controller and as such, this revision petition is hereby dismissed. January 31,2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge