IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2325 of 2009 DEENA NATH RAI, son of Pradeep Rai, resident of village Saidabad, P.S. Raghopur, District Vaishali Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 16.3.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered under Section 307 and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He is named in the First Information Report along with Mantu Rai @ Mantun Rai and eight others. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the allegation against him and co-accused Mantu Rai @ Mantun Rai is same, as both of them fired for terrorizing the people. Said Mantu Rai @ Mantun Rai has been admitted to the privilege of bail by this Court under orders dated 27.11.2008, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 39947 of 2008, Annexure-3 to this application. Let the court below verify that the allegation against the petitioner and co-accused Mantu Rai @ Mantun Rai is similar and if that be so then petitioner be also extended the same privilege, which has been extended to co-accused Mantu Rai @ Mantun Rai under orders dated 27.11.2008, Annexure-3 to this application. Let this order be communicated to the court of C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 90 of 2005 through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioner. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.) 2