5x BEFORE THE HGNmLE mGH CGURT OF J BILASPUR (C G) 1N THE MATTER OF L1). ACT W1). No.377éms ISM? ANITA (i. RAWATE$GEE 3? YRS, DIKECTG R, RURAL LIFE F‘KG63RAMME WK) BR. (i. KAWATE,R/O MIS$EUN (){HVWQUNT}, DISTI'. MAHASAMUND (LG. 2 SAUMYA KAN VAN MOHANTI (V0 D‘RFCTOR RURAL HIT FRUQRAMMF RIG MANAGER DEF? (3F R L P MOTM?UR IARHAuAC‘W DISTT. BILASPUR (LG. 34 RURAL LIFE f’ROGRAMME (REG. SOCIETY) THRO UGH THE DIRECTO RK’SECKETAR Y. MISSIGN CGMPO UNB MAHASAMUND, CI}, ---..--- PETITIONER VERSUS 4.THE DEFUTY LABGUR CQMMISeSIONER 1 AND APPRQPREATE GO VERRMENT, , ! ; UNEER INDUSTRLAL BESPEJ‘TE ACT,194? LUV.) ()FFICE OF THE LABOUR CGMMISSIQNER, GITANIALI NAGAR, £AH’UR. ~~~~~~~RESPONDENT ‘ U ; > . / r ' I. ?RESIDING QFFICER LABOUR COURT, RAIPUR,’ ANAND NAGAR, RAXPUR,‘(QG‘} ‘ ¥ L 2 SHRI BAHADUR 3INGH, z ‘V‘E‘ ‘ 10 “x weé’w:iff \W éa‘e" s’a \\ MISSIQN C(JMPQUND Y HST MAHASAMUND I IF 3.3TATE OF f3HHATTISGARH, _ TERGUGH THE SECRETARY, DEFARTMENT OF LABGE‘IR,D.K.$. BHAWAN, GE ROAD, RAIPUR, HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH : BILASPUR Wn't Petition No. 3776 of 2003 Pet'm'oners Smt. Anita G. Rawate 65 others Versus Respondcnts (Writ Peu‘tion under Article 226] 227 of the Constitution of India) (SB: Hon’bk Shri swish K. Agnihoui J.) None for the petitioner. V Té’ W; " Ms Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the respondents. Pmsiding omcer, Labour Court, Raipur 85 others ORDERjoral) ( Passed on this 15m. day of September, 2009) The matter is called for healing twice. On both the o none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the scouting ccasions petitioner. The yetitioner may not be interested in pro the matter. 2. In View of the foregoing, the pen'n'on is dismissed for want of prosecution. M Sd/— i, Smash K. Agnihotri \ ‘ Judge H‘W r I r - r :71. 1‘ 1