IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 3534 of 2010 Date of Decision: 2.3.2010 Laxmi Devi ....Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. The petitioner has approached this Court by way of instant writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to allot a plot to him in view of the policies (Annexures P-9 to P-18). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall feel satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.3 to decide the representations dated 20.1.2004, 15.6.2007, 19.2.2008 and 15.7.2009 (Annexures P-5 to P-8, respectively) filed before him for the relief claimed in this petition, on which no decision has so far been taken. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the file, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to decide the representations (Annexures P-5 to P- 8) moved by the petitioner by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. CWP No. 3534 of 2010 -2- It is further directed that before passing any order on the representations in question, the petitioner shall be afforded an opportunity of hearing. March 2, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE