BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty First day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15071 of 2011 IRULAYEE ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 Vs STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AVIYUR POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DT. CR.NO. 268/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.VENKATESAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is accused No.2 in Cr.No.268 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offence under Sections 294(b) and 355 of I.P.C. and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act. Apprehending arrest, at the hands of the respondent police, the petitioner is before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of the prosecution, the petitioner abused the de facto complainant with filthy language and also attacked her. It is the further case of the prosecution that now, the complainant is treated as out patient and she has been discharged from the hospital. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would deny the above allegations. According to him, due to previous enmity, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the petitioner, being a Woman, is entitled for anticipatory bail. 4. I have considered the above submissions. 5. Having regard to the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and also considering the fact that the petitioner is a woman, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with the following conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.II, Virudhunagar, on executing a bond for a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. sd/- 21/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II VIRUDHUNAGAR 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AVIYUR POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DT +1. CC to M/S. R.VENKATESAN Advocate SR.No.40757 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15071 of 2011 Date :21/11/2011 SMA/24.11.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/