1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 50. CA/6061/2004 In FAST/12336/2004 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. V.M.Humbe, Adv., for the applicant. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:1-2-2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr.Humbe, Counsel, extensively. 2. In an unfortunate accident, the claimant suffered amputation. The learned Judge granted compensation to the extent of Rs. 25,000/-. The present proceedings are for enhancement of the compensation. A report was called which indicated that the claimant had immoveable property in the name of her husband ( 1 H. 50 R.) Apart from that, Muktabai had other house from Government Scheme where she was residing with goats and carrying on her vocation. The contention that 2 she was not residing with her husband may be correct but that is a matter of evidence. The fact remains, the applicant herein has a worth, since she owns property under Government Scheme, with goats for her livelihood. Added to it is the amount of Rs.25,000/- disbursed under the very petition in terms of Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act. The request to treat the petition as of indigent person is lacking merit. Application rejected. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/6061-04ca